Case Name: Michael Pruzan et al., Appellants, v. Board of Education of City of New York, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1961-01-19
Citations: 9 N.Y.2d 680
Docket Number: 
Parties: Michael Pruzan et al., Appellants, v. Board of Education of City of New York, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 9
Pages: 680–681

Head Matter:
Michael Pruzan et al., Appellants, v. Board of Education of City of New York, Respondent.
Submitted January 11, 1961;
decided January 19, 1961.
Charles H. Tenney, Corporation Counsel (Leo A. Larkin of counsel), for motion to dismiss appeal and opposed to motion for a certificate that a constitutional question was involved, etc.
Harold G. Israelson and Arnold B. Streit for motion for a certificate that a constitutional question was involved, etc., and opposed to motion to dismiss appeal.

Opinion:
Motion to dismiss appeal granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and $10 costs of motion, upon the ground there are questions involved other than the constitutional validity of a statute (N. Y. Const., art. VI, § 7, subd. [2]; Civ. Prac. Act, § 588, subd. 4).
Motion for a certificate that a constitutional question is involved on the appeal herein denied.
Motion to dispense with the printing of Legislative Document No. 32 in the. record denied.
Motion for a preference denied.