Case Name: Randolph S. KOCH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT; Maryland Court of Special Appeals, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-02-25
Citations: 510 F. App'x 298
Docket Number: No. 12-2292
Parties: Randolph S. KOCH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT; Maryland Court of Special Appeals, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before AGEE and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 510
Pages: 298–299

Head Matter:
Randolph S. KOCH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT; Maryland Court of Special Appeals, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 12-2292.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 21, 2013.
Decided: Feb. 25, 2013.
Randolph S. Koch, Appellant Pro Se. Hugh Scott Curtis, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before AGEE and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Randolph S. Koch appeals the district court's dismissal of his civil action and denial of his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the district court's orders. Koch v. Montgomery Cnty. Cir. Ct., No. 8:11-cv-01888-JFM (D. Md. Aug. 2, 2012; Sept. 21, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.