Case Name: State of Ohio v. Annora B. Yeoman
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1925
Citations: 3 Ohio Law Abs. 185
Docket Number: No. 18803
Parties: State of Ohio v. Annora B. Yeoman.
Judges: Marshall, C. J., Matthias, Day, Allen, Kin-kade and Robinson, JJ., concur.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 3
Pages: 185–185

Head Matter:
No. 289
No. 18803
State of Ohio v. Annora B. Yeoman.
Exceptions to decision of the Court of ' Common Pleas of Morrow county.
333. CRIMINAL LAW—Inspection of (hr copy of written confession in possession of prosecuting attorney, cannot be compelled by defendant.

Opinion:
JÓNES, J. _
_ In a criminal case the defendant cannot compel the prosecuting attorney to submit to him or his counsel a written confession, signed by •the defendant and in the possession of the prosecuting attorney, for the purpose of inspection and copy. Neither Section 11552, General Code, nor Section 13664, General Code, requires the giving of such inspection.
Exceptions sustained.
Marshall, C. J., Matthias, Day, Allen, Kin-kade and Robinson, JJ., concur.