Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Rudolf "Rudy" Rogler, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1992-10-07
Citations: 186 A.D.2d 1076
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rudolf "Rudy" Rogler, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 186
Pages: 1076–1076

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rudolf "Rudy" Rogler, Appellant.

Opinion:
— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Upon our review of the record and consideration of the relevant factors (see, People v Cruickshank, 105 AD2d 325, 333-334, affd sub nom. People v Dawn Maria C., 67 NY2d 625), we find no abuse of discretion in the court's denial of defendant's application for youthful offender status (see, People v New, 171 AD2d 1006, lv denied 77 NY2d 998; People v Ortega, 114 AD2d 912, lv denied 67 NY2d 887). Further, we decline to exercise our discretion in the interest of justice to grant him that status (cf., People v Shrubsall, 167 AD2d 929, 930). Finally, the sentence imposed was neither harsh nor excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J. — Criminally Negligent Homicide.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Green, Balio, Fallon and Davis, JJ.