Case Name: SEARCY et al. v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1951-12-12
Citations: 244 S.W.2d 517
Docket Number: No. 25568
Parties: SEARCY et al. v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 244
Pages: 517–517

Head Matter:
SEARCY et al. v. STATE.
No. 25568.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Dec. 12, 1951.
No attorney on appeal for appellant.
Henry Wade, Dist. Atty., J. J. Fagan, Asst. Dist. Atty., Dallas, George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
WOODLEY, Commissioner.
Appellants Joe J. Danna and Max Rud-berg are the sureties of Tennison Searcy on a bond required by a magistrate for his appearance to answer a burglary charge.
Following his indictment, Tennison Sear-cy failed to appear.
A judgment nisi was entered and following service, was made final.
No brief has been filed by appellants following their notice of appeal, and the state's motion to dismiss the appeal must be granted. See Bell v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 244 S.W.2d 210.
The appeal is dismissed.
Opinion approved by the Court