Case Name: Richard T. DANIEL, Jr. and Aena M. Daniel, Petitioners-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1972-06-26
Citations: 461 F.2d 1265
Docket Number: No. 71-3419
Parties: Richard T. DANIEL, Jr. and Aena M. Daniel, Petitioners-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 461
Pages: 1265–1265

Head Matter:
Richard T. DANIEL, Jr. and Aena M. Daniel, Petitioners-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 71-3419.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
June 26, 1972.
Cecil A. Ray, Jr., James K. Rushing, William P. Hallman, Jr., Dallas, Tex., for petitioners-appellants.
K. Martin Worthy, Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service, Washington, D. C., Scott P. Crampton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Meyer Rothwacks, William S. Estabrook, Attys., Tax Div., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., Loring W. Post, Murray S. Horwitz, Attys., Tax Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., for respondent-appellee.
Before DYER, Circuit Judge, SKELTON, Judge, and INGRAHAM, Circuit Judge.
Judge Byron G. Skelton, U. S. Court of Claims, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
We are in agreement with the well-reasoned opinion of the United States Tax Court in this case, Richard T. Daniel, Jr., 56 T.C. 655 (1971), and its judgment for the respondent is affirmed.