Case Name: Kuchinskas et al. v. Broward County; Takahashi v. Livingston Union School District et al.; Jordan v. Kenton County Board of Education et al.; City of Tulsa v. Spradling et al.; Cherry v. Rocking Horse Ridge Estates Assn. et al.; Seeger v. Chater, Commissioner of Social Security; Gill v. Dalkon Shield Claimants Trust; Castro v. United States; Davis v. Hanover Insurance Co. et al.; Randall v. United States; Tucker v. Department of Education et al.; Ivy v. Miller, Superintendent, Boonville Correctional Center; Freeman v. Young, Executive Director, Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles, et al.; Veale v. New Hampshire; Shoobs v. Zaveletta et al.; Tucker v. Coggins/Continental Granite Co., Inc.; Gravely v. United States; Garner v. Pennington et al.; Cooper v. Missouri Parole Board et al.; Karim-Panahi v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue; Wells v. Gomez, Director, California Department of Corrections, et al.; Boulineau v. West, Secretary of the Army, et al.; Baticados v. White, Warden, et al.; Smith v. Pennsylvania; Williams v. United States, In re Stearman, Luongo v. United States
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1997-04-14
Citations: 520 U.S. 1182
Docket Number: No. 96-652; No. 96-884; No. 96-891; No. 96-905; No. 96-909; No. 96-933; No. 96-1045; No. 96-1068; No. 96-1074; No. 96-1086; No. 96-6108; No. 96-6514; No. 96-6862; No. 96-6918; No. 96-6969; No. 96-7044; No. 96-7053; No. 96-7114; No. 96-7152; No. 96-7191; No. 96-7202; No. 96-7207; No. 96-7208; No. 96-7228; No. 96-7247; No. 96-7433; No. 96-7493
Parties: Kuchinskas et al. v. Broward County, Takahashi v. Livingston Union School District et al., Jordan v. Kenton County Board of Education et al., City of Tulsa v. Spradling et al., Cherry v. Rocking Horse Ridge Estates Assn. et al., Seeger v. Chater, Commissioner of Social Security, Gill v. Dalkon Shield Claimants Trust, Castro v. United States, Davis v. Hanover Insurance Co. et al., Randall v. United States, Tucker v. Department of Education et al., Ivy v. Miller, Superintendent, Boonville Correctional Center, Freeman v. Young, Executive Director, Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles, et al., Veale v. New Hampshire, Shoobs v. Zaveletta et al., Tucker v. Coggins/Continental Granite Co., Inc., Gravely v. United States, Garner v. Pennington et al., Cooper v. Missouri Parole Board et al., Karim-Panahi v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Wells v. Gomez, Director, California Department of Corrections, et al., Boulineau v. West, Secretary of the Army, et al., Baticados v. White, Warden, et al., Smith v. Pennsylvania, Williams v. United States, In re Stearman, Luongo v. United States,
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 520
Pages: 1182–1183

Head Matter:
No. 96-652.
No. 96-884.
No. 96-891.
No. 96-905.
No. 96-909.
No. 96-933.
No. 96-1045.
No. 96-1068.
No. 96-1074.
No. 96-1086.
No. 96-6108.
No. 96-6514.
No. 96-6862.
No. 96-6918.
No. 96-6969.
No. 96-7044.
No. 96-7053.
No. 96-7114.
No. 96-7152.
No. 96-7191.
No. 96-7202.
Kuchinskas et al. v. Broward County, Takahashi v. Livingston Union School District et al., Jordan v. Kenton County Board of Education et al., City of Tulsa v. Spradling et al., Cherry v. Rocking Horse Ridge Estates Assn. et al., Seeger v. Chater, Commissioner of Social Security, Gill v. Dalkon Shield Claimants Trust, Castro v. United States, Davis v. Hanover Insurance Co. et al., Randall v. United States, Tucker v. Department of Education et al., Ivy v. Miller, Superintendent, Boonville Correctional Center, Freeman v. Young, Executive Director, Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles, et al., Veale v. New Hampshire, Shoobs v. Zaveletta et al., Tucker v. Coggins/Continental Granite Co., Inc., Gravely v. United States, Garner v. Pennington et al., Cooper v. Missouri Parole Board et al., Karim-Panahi v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Wells v. Gomez, Director, California Department of Corrections, et al., Boulineau v. West, Secretary of the Army, et al., Baticados v. White, Warden, et al., Smith v. Pennsylvania, Williams v. United States, In re Stearman, Luongo v. United States,

Opinion:
519 U. S. 1148;
519 U. S. 1112;
519 U. S. 1142;
519 U. S. 1149;
519 U. S. 1113;
519 U. S. 1114;
519 U. S. 1150;
519 U. S. 1118;
ante, p. 1104;
519 U. S. 1150;
519 U. S. 1013;
519 U. S. 1064;
519 U. S. 1121;
519 U. S. 1122;
519 U. S. 1123;
519 U. S. 1125;
519 U. S. 1099;
519 U. S. 1128;
519 U. S. 1129;
519 U. S. 1131;
519 U. S. 1152;
No. 96-7207.
No. 96-7208.
No. 96-7228.
No. 96-7247.
No. 96-7433.
No. 96-7493.
519 U. S. 1152;
519 U. S. 1152;
519 U. S. 1158;
519 U. S. 1183;
519 U. S. 1107; and
519 U. S. 1118. Petitions for rehearing denied.