Case Name: Ernest S. HENDRY, Jr.; Judith V. Hendry, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The GEORGELAS GROUP, INC., a Corporation Chartered in the Commonwealth of Virginia in Business Under the Common Name and Style of Said Company; Francis J. Pelland, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-05-21
Citations: 603 F. App'x 222
Docket Number: No. 15-1161
Parties: Ernest S. HENDRY, Jr.; Judith V. Hendry, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The GEORGELAS GROUP, INC., a Corporation Chartered in the Commonwealth of Virginia in Business Under the Common Name and Style of Said Company; Francis J. Pelland, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 603
Pages: 222–223

Head Matter:
Ernest S. HENDRY, Jr.; Judith V. Hendry, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The GEORGELAS GROUP, INC., a Corporation Chartered in the Commonwealth of Virginia in Business Under the Common Name and Style of Said Company; Francis J. Pelland, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15-1161.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 19, 2015.
Decided: May 21, 2015.
Ernest S. Hendry, Jr., and Judith V. Hendry, Appellants Pro Se. Peter F. Axel-rad, Council, Baradel, Kosmerl & Nolan, PA, Annapolis, Maryland; Robert Mccay Hardy, Carol Thomas Stone, Jordan Coyne LLP, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appel-lees.
Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ernest S. Hendry, Jr., and Judith V. Hendry appeal the district court's order dismissing their civil action on statute of limitations grounds. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. Hendry v. The Georgelas Group, Inc., No. 1:14-cv-01455-JCC-TCB, 2015 WL 268951 (E.D.Va. Jan. 21, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.