Case Name: Demond A. HORTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-06-15
Citations: 136 S.W.3d 829
Docket Number: No. ED 83399
Parties: Demond A. HORTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL JR., J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 136
Pages: 829–830

Head Matter:
Demond A. HORTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 83399.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
June 15, 2004.
S. Kristina Starke, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Charnette D. Douglass, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL JR., J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Demond A. Horton ("movant") appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 24.035 on the merits without evidentiary hearing. In his motion, movant claims that his guilty plea was involuntarily entered, and he was denied effective assistance of counsel.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).