Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Acdias DE LA CRUZ-OLAN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-12-16
Citations: 587 F. App'x 227
Docket Number: No. 13-11150
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Acdias DE LA CRUZ-OLAN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 587
Pages: 227–228

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Acdias DE LA CRUZ-OLAN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-11150
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 16, 2014.
James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Jerry Van Beard, Esq., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Dallas, TX, David E. Sloan, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Lubbock, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before KING, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Acdias De La Cruz-Olan has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). De La Cruz-Olan has not filed a response and has. been removed from the United States. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is ex-, cused fi"om further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as frivolous, see 5th Cir. R. 42.2, and in part as moot, see United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis, 483 F.3d 381, 382-83 (5th Cir.2007).
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.