Case Name: AMERICAN SLICING MACH. CO., Appellant, v. CORKEDALE, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1914-11-06
Citations: 149 N.Y.S. 1069
Docket Number: 
Parties: AMERICAN SLICING MACH. CO., Appellant, v. CORKEDALE, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 149
Pages: 1069–1069

Head Matter:
AMERICAN SLICING MACH. CO., Appellant, v. CORKEDALE, Respondent.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
November 6, 1914.)
Action by the American Slicing Machine Company against Maxwell Corkedale.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Although we have repeatedly called attention to the rule requiring appellant to state facts showing that the appeal is a meritorious one, there has been no attempt to comply with this rule. In addition, no excuse is offered for appellant's laches. The motion to dismiss the appeal is granted, with $10 costs.