Case Name: Thearon SAMPSON, a/k/a Ron Sampson, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2001-04-25
Citations: 794 So. 2d 631
Docket Number: No. 2D00-2243
Parties: Thearon SAMPSON, a/k/a Ron Sampson, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: THREADGILL; A.C.J., and FULMER and GREEN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 794
Pages: 631–631

Head Matter:
Thearon SAMPSON, a/k/a Ron Sampson, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D00-2243.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
April 25, 2001.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Thearon Sampson appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Sampson alleges that his plea was involuntary because the trial court did not adequately advise him of the consequences of habitualization. Sampson's claim, although not refuted by the record attachments, is facially insufficient. See Newsome v. State, 704 So.2d 213 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). We therefore affirm the trial court's order without prejudice to Sampson's right to file a facially sufficient rule 3.850 motion. We affirm the denial of Sampson's remaining claim without comment.
THREADGILL; A.C.J., and FULMER and GREEN, JJ., concur.