Case Name: Frostifresh Corporation, Appellant, v. Luis Reynoso et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1967-05-24
Citations: 54 Misc. 2d 119
Docket Number: 
Parties: Frostifresh Corporation, Appellant, v. Luis Reynoso et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 54
Pages: 119–120

Head Matter:
Frostifresh Corporation, Appellant, v. Luis Reynoso et al., Respondents.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
May 24, 1967.
Keilson & Keilson (Joseph Keilson of counsel), for appellant. Ira I. Van Leer for respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
While the evidence clearly warrants a finding that the contract was unconscionable (Uniform Commercial Code, § 2-302), we are of the opinion that plaintiff should recover its net cost for the refrigerator-freezer, plus a reasonable profit, in addition to. trucking and service charges necessarily incurred and reasonable finance charges.
The judgment should be unanimously reversed, without costs, and a new trial ordered limited to an assessment of plaintiff's damages and entry of judgment thereon.
Concur — Schwartzwald, Fanelli and Beckinella, JJ.
Judgment reversed, etc.