Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Zeidel DIAMAND, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-06-24
Citations: 137 F. App'x 58
Docket Number: No. 03-50174; D.C. No. CR-01-01415-BTM
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Zeidel DIAMAND, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KLEINFELD, TASHIMA, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 137
Pages: 58–58

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Zeidel DIAMAND, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 03-50174.
D.C. No. CR-01-01415-BTM.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 14, 2005.
Decided June 24, 2005.
Michael J. Crowley, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for PlaintiffAppellee.
David Zeidel Diamand, San Diego, CA, pro se.
Antonio F. Yoon, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before KLEINFELD, TASHIMA, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
David Zeidel Diamand appeals the judgment of conviction and sentence following his guilty plea to conspiracy, wire fraud, mail fraud, and conspiracy to commit money laundering. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
We dismiss in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2000) (stating that an appeal waiver is valid when it is entered into knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Cardenas, 405 F.3d 1046, 1048 (9th Cir.2005) (holding that the changes in sentencing law imposed by United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), did not render waiver of appeal involuntary and unknowing).
All pending motions are denied as moot.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.