Case Name: In the Matter of Perry Bellamy, Appellant, v. New York City Police Department, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2013-02-12
Citations: 20 N.Y.3d 1028
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Perry Bellamy, Appellant, v New York City Police Department, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 20
Pages: 1028–1029

Head Matter:
[984 NE2d 317, 960 NYS2d 343]
In the Matter of Perry Bellamy, Appellant, v New York City Police Department, Respondent.
Decided February 12, 2013
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Perry Bellamy, appellant pro se.
Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York City (Sharyn Rootenberg and Larry A. Sonnenshein of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, without costs, and certified question not answered on the ground that it is unnecessary. In denying the subject Freedom of Information Law request, the Appellate Division did not abuse its discretion.
Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith and Pigott. Taking no part: Judge Rivera.