Case Name: SUTHERLAND, Appellant, v. CITY COUNCIL OF KLAMATH FALLS, Respondents-Respondents, SOUTH SIXTH STREET AUTO WRECKING, Intervenor-Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1980-02-11
Citations: 44 Or. App. 359
Docket Number: No. 79-89 E, CA 15005
Parties: SUTHERLAND, Appellant, v. CITY COUNCIL OF KLAMATH FALLS, Respondents-Respondents, SOUTH SIXTH STREET AUTO WRECKING, Intervenor-Respondent.
Judges: Before Joseph, Presiding Judge, and Lee and Richardson, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 44
Pages: 359–361

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted January 14,
affirmed February 11, 1980
SUTHERLAND, Appellant, v. CITY COUNCIL OF KLAMATH FALLS, Respondents-Respondents, SOUTH SIXTH STREET AUTO WRECKING, Intervenor-Respondent.
(No. 79-89 E, CA 15005)
605 P2d 1220
Philip W. Studenberg, Klamath Falls, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.
B. J. Matzen, City Attorney, Klamath Falls, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents-respondents.
Robert S. Hamilton, Klamath Falls, argued the cause and filed the brief for intervenor-respondent.
Before Joseph, Presiding Judge, and Lee and Richardson, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
The only issue presented by this appeal having been resolved since the filing of the briefs by Neuberger v. City of Portland, 288 Or 155, 603 P2d 771 (1979), the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Affirmed.