Case Name: James H. BENTLEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. David A. GARRAGHTY, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-04-25
Citations: 11 F. App'x 164
Docket Number: No. 01-6213
Parties: James H. BENTLEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. David A. GARRAGHTY, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 11
Pages: 164–165

Head Matter:
James H. BENTLEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. David A. GARRAGHTY, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 01-6213.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 13, 2001.
Decided April 25, 2001.
James H. Bentley, pro se. Donald Eldridge Jeffrey, III, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for appellee.
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
James H. Bentley appeals the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Bentley v. Garraghty, No. CA-00-1700-AM (E.D.Va. filed Jan. 17, 2001; entered Jan. 18, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.