Case Name: In re ONE 1979 FORD VAN, VIN E14BHAK9227 CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG, a municipal corporation, for the Use and Benefit of the ST. PETERSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT, ex rel. STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Rocky DROSIS, William Westcott, and Gerald Thomas, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1983-12-28
Citations: 443 So. 2d 349
Docket Number: No. 83-1573
Parties: In re ONE 1979 FORD VAN, VIN E14BHAK9227 CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG, a municipal corporation, for the Use and Benefit of the ST. PETERSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT, ex rel. STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Rocky DROSIS, William Westcott, and Gerald Thomas, Appellees.
Judges: OTT, C.J., and BOARDMAN and LE-HAN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 443
Pages: 349–349

Head Matter:
In re ONE 1979 FORD VAN, VIN E14BHAK9227 CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG, a municipal corporation, for the Use and Benefit of the ST. PETERSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT, ex rel. STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Rocky DROSIS, William Westcott, and Gerald Thomas, Appellees.
No. 83-1573.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Dec. 28, 1983.
M.S. Davis, City Atty., and Larry D. Brown, Asst. City Atty., St. Petersburg, for appellant.
Robert W. Pope, St. Petersburg, for ap-pellee Gerald Thomas.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant seeks to appeal a nonfinal order granting appellees' motion to strike appellant's amended petition for rule to show cause and for final order of forfeiture. We sua sponte dismiss the appeal. See Guth v. Howard, 362 So.2d 725 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978).
We have considered appellant's contention that the appeal comes within the provision of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(C)(ii) and find it to be without merit.
Appeal dismissed.
OTT, C.J., and BOARDMAN and LE-HAN, JJ., concur.