Case Name: Cheryl Crook et al., Appellants, v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours Company et al., Defendants, and National Chemsearch, Division of N.C.H. Corp., et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1993-02-16
Citations: 81 N.Y.2d 807
Docket Number: 
Parties: Cheryl Crook et al., Appellants, v E. I. du Pont de Nemours Company et al., Defendants, and National Chemsearch, Division of N.C.H. Corp., et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 81
Pages: 807–810

Head Matter:
Cheryl Crook et al., Appellants, v E. I. du Pont de Nemours Company et al., Defendants, and National Chemsearch, Division of N.C.H. Corp., et al., Respondents.
Argued January 13, 1993;
decided February 16, 1993
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Andrew F. Plasse, Fayetteville, for appellants.
Saperston & Day, P. C, Buffalo (Catherine Habermehl of counsel), for National Chemsearch, Division of N.C.H. Corp., respondent.
Falk & Siemer, Buffalo (J. Joseph Wilder and Michael P. McClaren of counsel), for Hotsy Corporation, respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (181 AD2d 1039).
Concur: Acting Chief Judge Simons and Judges Kaye, Ti- tone, Bellacosa and Smith. Taking no part: Judge Hancock, Jr.