Case Name: IN THE MATTER OF ARTHUR WARNER, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1964-09-22
Citations: 43 N.J. 254
Docket Number: 
Parties: IN THE MATTER OF ARTHUR WARNER, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW.
Judges: For disbarment — Chief Justice WeiNTRAub, and Justices Jaoobs, FraNois, Proctor, Hail, SohettiNo and HaNemaN —7.
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 43
Pages: 254–255

Head Matter:
IN THE MATTER OF ARTHUR WARNER, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW.
Argued September 10, 1964
Decided September 22, 1964.
Mr. Frederick G. Vonhof for the order.
No appearance for respondent.

Opinion:
Pek CuRIAM.
The respondent was convicted of grand theft, a felony, in the Superior Court of California. On appeal the conviction was affirmed. People v. Warner, 134 Cal. App. 2d 829, 286 P. 2d 560 (D. Ct. App. 1955). The Supreme Court of the United States denied his application for a writ of certiorari. Warner v. California, 351 U. S. 912, 76 S. Ct. 701, 100 L. Ed. 1446 (1956). The respondent has offered his resignation from the bar of this State but in the circumstances that offer is unacceptable.
The order of the court is that the name of the respondent be stricken from the roll of attorneys.
For disbarment — Chief Justice WeiNTRAub, and Justices Jaoobs, FraNois, Proctor, Hail, SohettiNo and HaNemaN —7.
Opposed — None.