Case Name: Inetha M. CARR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. H.O.P.E. COMMUNITY SERVICE, INC., f/k/a Central Piedmont Action Council, Incorporated, f/k/a C-PAC, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-05-23
Citations: 430 F. App'x 228
Docket Number: No. 11-1353
Parties: Inetha M. CARR, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. H.O.P.E. COMMUNITY SERVICE, INC., f/k/a Central Piedmont Action Council, Incorporated, f/k/a C-PAC, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 430
Pages: 228–228

Head Matter:
Inetha M. CARR, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. H.O.P.E. COMMUNITY SERVICE, INC., f/k/a Central Piedmont Action Council, Incorporated, f/k/a C-PAC, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 11-1353.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 19, 2011.
Decided: May 23, 2011.
Inetha Michelle Carr, Appellant Pro Se.
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Inetha Michelle Carr appeals the district court's order granting her motion to proceed in forma pauperis and summarily dismissing her complaint for failing to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Carr v. H.O.P.E. Community Serv., No. 3:11-cv-00159-JRS (E.D.Va. Mar. 24, 2011). We deny Carr's motions for a formal hearing and for a transcript at Government's expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.