Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Penny Lynn SPENCER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-08-23
Citations: 235 F. App'x 673
Docket Number: No. 07-30116
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Penny Lynn SPENCER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: KLEINFELD, SILVERMAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 235
Pages: 673–674

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Penny Lynn SPENCER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-30116.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 13, 2007.
Filed Aug. 23, 2007.
William W. Mercer, Esq., Timothy J. Racicot, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Missoula, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
John P. Rhodes, Esq., Federal Defenders of Montana, Missoula, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: KLEINFELD, SILVERMAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Penny Lynn Spencer appeals the district court's judgment revoking her supervised release and imposing a new term of imprisonment. She contends that the district court violated her Sixth Amendment rights when it made fact findings in support of the revocation and the new term. As Spencer acknowledges, this contention is foreclosed by United States v. Huerta-Pimental, 445 F.3d 1220 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 545, 166 L.Ed.2d 403 (2006).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.