Case Name: Samuel J. Stiebel and Others, Copartners, Doing Business under the Name of Stiebel, Hernsheim and Company, Respondents, v. John J. Haigney, Appellant, Impleaded with John Glassford and Ellen Hollander, Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1909-11-19
Citations: 134 A.D. 522
Docket Number: No. 2
Parties: Samuel J. Stiebel and Others, Copartners, Doing Business under the Name of Stiebel, Hernsheim and Company, Respondents, v. John J. Haigney, Appellant, Impleaded with John Glassford and Ellen Hollander, Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 134
Pages: 522–523

Head Matter:
Samuel J. Stiebel and Others, Copartners, Doing Business under the Name of Stiebel, Hernsheim and Company, Respondents, v. John J. Haigney, Appellant, Impleaded with John Glassford and Ellen Hollander, Defendants.
(No. 2.)
First Department,
November 19, 1909.
(See head note in Stiebel v. Haigney,,No, 1, ante, p. 316.)
Appeal by the defendant, John J. Haigney, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiffs, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Mew York on the 9th day of February, 1909, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the Hew York Special Term in a suit in equity to foreclose a lien upon certain shares of stock.
Ernest P. Seelman of counsel [Seelman & Farley, attorneys], for the appellant.
Francis L. Kohlman of counsel [Hand, Bonney & Jones, attorneys], for the respondents.

Opinion:
Clarke, J.:
This case was tried at the same time as Stiebel v. Haigney, No. 1 (134 App. Div. 516), the opinion in which is handed down herewith, and for the reasons there stated this judgment should be affirmed, with costs and disbursements.
Ingraham, Laughlix, Houghton and Scott, JJ., concurred.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.