Case Name: Alan Ira KARTEN, Appellant, v. Albert KENT and Patricia Kent, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-04-10
Citations: 559 So. 2d 384
Docket Number: No. 89-1054
Parties: Alan Ira KARTEN, Appellant, v. Albert KENT and Patricia Kent, Appellees.
Judges: Before HUBBART, COPE and LEVY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 559
Pages: 384–384

Head Matter:
Alan Ira KARTEN, Appellant, v. Albert KENT and Patricia Kent, Appellees.
No. 89-1054.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 10, 1990.
Paul Moms, Coral Gables, for appellant.
Young, Stern & Tannenbaum, North Miami Beach, and Andrew S. Berman, for ap-pellees.
Before HUBBART, COPE and LEVY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant Alan Karten, defendant below, appeals a final judgment against him on a claim for conversion. We conclude that the law of conversion was correctly applied, Senfeld v. Bank of Nova Scotia Trust Co., 450 So.2d 1157 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); that Paul Kent was not an indispensable party, W.R. Cooper, Inc. v. City of Miami Beach, 512 So.2d 324 (Pla. 3d DCA 1987); and that no reversible error has been shown with respect to the evidentiary rulings.
Affirmed.