Case Name: FRANK B. EATON, RESPONDENT, v. VILLAGE OF SOUTH ORANGE ET AL., APPELLANTS
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1926-10-18
Citations: 103 N.J.L. 182
Docket Number: 
Parties: FRANK B. EATON, RESPONDENT, v. VILLAGE OF SOUTH ORANGE ET AL., APPELLANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 103
Pages: 182–182

Head Matter:
FRANK B. EATON, RESPONDENT, v. VILLAGE OF SOUTH ORANGE ET AL., APPELLANTS.
Argued May 20, 1926
Decided October 18, 1926.
Por the appellants, Biker & Biker.
Por the respondent, Howe & Davis.

Opinion:
Pee Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.