Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fernando CEBALLOS-MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-06-16
Citations: 387 F.3d 1140
Docket Number: No. 02-2273
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fernando CEBALLOS-MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before TACHA, Chief Circuit Judge, McKAY, and McCONNELL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 387
Pages: 1140–1146

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fernando CEBALLOS-MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-2273.
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
Filed June 16, 2004.
Submitted on the briefs: Alonzo J. Padilla, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Albuquerque, NM, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
David C. Iglesias, United States Attorney, and David N. Williams, Assistant United States Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Albuquerque, NM, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before TACHA, Chief Circuit Judge, McKAY, and McCONNELL, Circuit Judges.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Opinion:
ORDER
TACHA, Chief Circuit Judge.
Upon further consideration of appellant's petition for rehearing, the court called for an en banc poll.
The petition for rehearing was transmitted to the en banc court, which is composed of all of the judges of the court who are in regular active service, and is denied. Judges Henry, Briscoe, Lucero, and Hartz would grant rehearing.