Case Name: Stephen G. Van Hoesen et al., respondent, v. Samuel Gelfen et al., appellant
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1932-02-01
Citations: 110 N.J. Eq. 69
Docket Number: 
Parties: Stephen G. Van Hoesen et al., respondent, v. Samuel Gelfen et al., appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 110
Pages: 69–69

Head Matter:
Stephen G. Van Hoesen et al., respondent, v. Samuel Gelfen et al., appellant.
[Decided February 1st, 1932.]
Mr. Harold Bouton, for the respondent.
Messrs. Kraemer, Siegler & Siegler, for the appellant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan, and reported in 103 N. J. Eq. 234.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Teenchaed, Paekee, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Daly, Donges, Van Buskiek, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.