Case Name: Berliner Handels-und Frankfurter Bank, New York Branch, Respondent, v. Vincent Coppola et al., Appellants
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1995-09-21
Citations: 86 N.Y.2d 829
Docket Number: 
Parties: Berliner Handels-und Frankfurter Bank, New York Branch, Respondent, v Vincent Coppola et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 86
Pages: 829–829

Head Matter:
Berliner Handels-und Frankfurter Bank, New York Branch, Respondent, v Vincent Coppola et al., Appellants.
Submitted June 5, 1995;
decided September 21, 1995

Opinion:
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed the order of Supreme Court denying appellants' motion for reargument or renewal, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied, with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements.