Case Name: Martin L. MAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RHA, Attn: John White-Chief Ethics Compliance Ofcr., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-04-18
Citations: 685 F. App'x 227
Docket Number: No. 16-1870
Parties: Martin L. MAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RHA, Attn: John White-Chief Ethics Compliance Ofcr., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 685
Pages: 227–227

Head Matter:
Martin L. MAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RHA, Attn: John White-Chief Ethics Compliance Ofcr., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 16-1870
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 30, 2017
Decided: April 18, 2017
Martin L. May, Appellant Pro Se. Randall D. Avram, Jennifer Rasile Everitt, KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Martin L. May appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing May's employment discrimination action as time-barred. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant May's application to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. May v. RHA No. 1:15-cv-00291-MR-DLH, 2016 WL 4059203 (W.D.N.C. July 26, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED