Case Name: Dedric L. RASH, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-11-16
Citations: 150 S.W.3d 127
Docket Number: No. ED 83919
Parties: Dedric L. RASH, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., J., MARY K. HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 150
Pages: 127–127

Head Matter:
Dedric L. RASH, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 83919.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Nov. 16, 2004.
S. Paige Canfield, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Shaun Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., J., MARY K. HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Dedric L. Rash (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Previously we affirmed Movant's convictions of attempted kidnapping, sections 564.011and 565.110 RSMo 2000 and robbery in the second degree, section 569.030. State v. Rash, 89 S.W.3d 526 (Mo.App. E.D.2002). Movant now contends his trial attorney provided ineffective assistance by failing to object to the admission of telephone records without a proper foundation to establish their authenticity.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
. All statutory references are to RSMo 2000, unless otherwise indicated.