Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kingdawud Mujahid BURGESS, a/k/a David Clifton Burgess, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-08-27
Citations: 582 F. App'x 229
Docket Number: No. 14-6596
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kingdawud Mujahid BURGESS, a/k/a David Clifton Burgess, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 582
Pages: 229–230

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kingdawud Mujahid BURGESS, a/k/a David Clifton Burgess, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 14-6596.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 20, 2014.
Decided: Aug. 27, 2014.
Kingdawud Mujahid Burgess, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis Michael Fitzpatrick, Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Kingdawud Mujahid Burgess appeals the district court's order denying his motions under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Burgess, No. 1:06-cr-00429-GBL-1, 2012 WL 1378322 (E.D.Va. Apr. 18, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.