Case Name: Ralph Gene LILLEY, Appellant/Claimant, v. SECOND INJURY FUND, Respondent/Insurer
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2008-01-22
Citations: 243 S.W.3d 546
Docket Number: No. ED 90003
Parties: Ralph Gene LILLEY, Appellant/Claimant, v. SECOND INJURY FUND, Respondent/Insurer.
Judges: Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 243
Pages: 546–547

Head Matter:
Ralph Gene LILLEY, Appellant/Claimant, v. SECOND INJURY FUND, Respondent/Insurer.
No. ED 90003.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Jan. 22, 2008.
Harry J. Nichols, Saint Louis, MO, for Appellant/Claimant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Michael T. Finneran, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent/Insurer.
Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Ralph Gene Lilley appeals from the Final Award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying him workers compensation from the Second Injury Fund. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the Final Award is supported by sufficient competent and substantial evidence and is not contrary to the weight of the evidence. Knisley v. Charleswood, Corp., 211 S.W.3d 629, 633 (Mo.App. E.D.2007). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).