Case Name: In re The ADOPTION OF R.M.G. E.G. and M.T.G., Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1998-10-14
Citations: 718 So. 2d 942
Docket Number: No. 97-2732
Parties: In re The ADOPTION OF R.M.G. E.G. and M.T.G., Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before NESBITT, JORGENSON and SORONDO, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 718
Pages: 942–943

Head Matter:
In re The ADOPTION OF R.M.G. E.G. and M.T.G., Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 97-2732.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 14, 1998.
Abrams, Abrams & Etter, and Brenda Abrams, Miami, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Linda Katz, Assistant Attorney General, as amicus curiae.
Magda Montiel Davis and Kari Ann Woodward, Miami, as guardian ad litem.
Before NESBITT, JORGENSON and SORONDO, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The trial court in this case entered final judgment denying a petition for adoption, upon a finding of an inadequate diligent search with regard to constructive service on the biological father. We agree with the adoptive parents' argument that having found service of process to be inadequate, the trial court should have permitted additional time to effect proper service, rather than denying the petition outright. See Condotel Bahamas, Ltd. v. Leavell Bahamas, Ltd., 276 So.2d 189 (Fla. 4th DCA1973). See also Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.070 (providing in part "[w]hen any process is returned not executed or returned improperly executed for any defendant, the party causing its issuance shall be entitled to such additional process against the unserved party as is required to effect service.")
The order under review is reversed and the cause remanded.