Case Name: HUDSON & MANHATTAN RAILROAD COMPANY, ET AL., PROSECUTORS-APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1950-10-23
Citations: 5 N.J. 434
Docket Number: 
Parties: HUDSON & MANHATTAN RAILROAD COMPANY, ET AL., PROSECUTORS-APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 5
Pages: 434–434

Head Matter:
HUDSON & MANHATTAN RAILROAD COMPANY, ET AL., PROSECUTORS-APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Argued October 2, 1950
Decided October 23, 1950.
Mr. John Warren argued the cause for the appellants (ilir. Aaron A. Melniher, Messrs. Carpenter, Gilmour <& Dwyer, Mr. Nicholas S. Bago and Mr. Sydney L. Jacobs, attorneys').
Mr. Thomas J. Brogan argued the cause for the respondent '(Mr. John B. Graf, attorney).

Opinion:
Pee Cueiam.
The judgment under review is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Jacobs in the Superior Court, Appellate Division.
For affirmance—Chief Justice Vandebbilt, and Justices Case, Heíiee, Oliehant, 'Wachenebld, Bubling and Ackebson—7.
For reversal—Hone.