Case Name: Joseph F. CAFFREY, Appellant, v. James C. RUDIS, and Jane A. Rudis, his wife, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1994-01-04
Citations: 639 So. 2d 990
Docket Number: No. 93-2286
Parties: Joseph F. CAFFREY, Appellant, v. James C. RUDIS, and Jane A. Rudis, his wife, Appellees.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, BASKIN and GERSTEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 639
Pages: 990–990

Head Matter:
Joseph F. CAFFREY, Appellant, v. James C. RUDIS, and Jane A. Rudis, his wife, Appellees.
No. 93-2286.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan. 4, 1994.
Michael R. Barnes, Key West, for appellant.
Erol M. Vural, Summerland Key, for ap-pellees.
Before BARKDULL, BASKIN and GERSTEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Because the trial court did not specify the reasons for entering an injunction, in violation of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610(c), we reverse. City of Miami v. Coll, 546 So.2d 775 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). We remand for dissolution of the injunction.
Reversed and remanded.