Case Name: In re WALTHAM WATCH CO.
Court: United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1950-07-31
Citations: 92 F. Supp. 871
Docket Number: No. 121-50
Parties: In re WALTHAM WATCH CO.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Supplement
Volume: 92
Pages: 871–871

Head Matter:
In re WALTHAM WATCH CO.
No. 121-50.
United States District Court D. Massachusetts.
July 31, 1950.
See also 92 F.Supp. 871.
Harry Bergson and Charles C. Cabot, Boston, Mass., for Reconstruction Finance Corporation.
Daniel J. Lyne, Jacob J. Kaplan and C. Keefe Hurley, all of Boston, Mass., Trustees, pro se.

Opinion:
SWEENEY, Chief Judge.
The motion for a stay of the Court's order entered as of July 10, 1950, has been denied this afternoon in open court. Inasmuch as the commodities ordered sold are perishable and seasonal we cannot allow further delay by the Reconstruction Finance Corporation. The order entered as of July 10, 1950, must be fully complied with by 4:00 P.M. Tuesday, August 8.
Oral motion by the Reconstruction Finance Corporation has been made to have the Court set the amount of a supersedeas bond. This application is apparently made on the mistaken belief that the appeal pending is under subdivision (d) of Rule 62 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. Inasmuch as the appeal is from a judgment granting an injunction it is governed by subdivision (c). This being so, this Court exercises its discretion by refusing to suspend or modify the injunction.
The motion of the Reconstruction Finance Corporation is denied.