Case Name: Astra Pictures, Inc., Respondent, v. Ida Schapiro, as Administratrix of the Estate of Jacob Schapiro, Deceased, Appellant, et al., Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1944-06-03
Citations: 182 Misc. 19
Docket Number: 
Parties: Astra Pictures, Inc., Respondent, v. Ida Schapiro, as Administratrix of the Estate of Jacob Schapiro, Deceased, Appellant, et al., Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 182
Pages: 19–20

Head Matter:
Astra Pictures, Inc., Respondent, v. Ida Schapiro, as Administratrix of the Estate of Jacob Schapiro, Deceased, Appellant, et al., Defendants.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
June 3, 1944.
David Berg for appellant.
Gustave I. Jahr for respondent.

Opinion:
Memobandum Per Curiam.
Appellant is entitled to plead the defense of usury. While the corporate defendant may not plead usury, the appellant's intestate, who signed the note as comaker, may avail himself of that defense.
The order should be modified to the extent of granting defendant-appellant's motion to amend the answer to include the defense of usury, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs. Service of amended answer, on or before June 12th, to be without prejudice to the present position of the cause upon the calendar.
Shientag, McLaughlin and Hecht, JJ., concur.
Ordered accordingly.