Case Name: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. Byron C. MEYERS, Jr., Appellant in No. 19434. Appeal of Eric DYKES in No. 19,435. Appeal of Stephen J. RUSSELL, in No. 19,436. Appeal of Edward SUBER, in No. 19,437. Appeal of Mark K. COVINGTON, in No. 19,438. Appeal of William D. ALLIE, in No. 19,439. Appeal of Julius WILLIAMS, also known as Clarence J. Williams, in No. 19,440; COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. Francis BARR, Appellant in No. 19441, Tony Notts. Appeal of Tony NOTTS, in No. 19,442
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1971-11-05
Citations: 449 F.2d 787
Docket Number: Nos. 19434, 19442
Parties: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. Byron C. MEYERS, Jr., Appellant in No. 19434. Appeal of Eric DYKES in No. 19,435. Appeal of Stephen J. RUSSELL, in No. 19,436. Appeal of Edward SUBER, in No. 19,437. Appeal of Mark K. COVINGTON, in No. 19,438. Appeal of William D. ALLIE, in No. 19,439. Appeal of Julius WILLIAMS, also known as Clarence J. Williams, in No. 19,440. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. Francis BARR, Appellant in No. 19441, Tony Notts. Appeal of Tony NOTTS, in No. 19,442.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 449
Pages: 787–787

Head Matter:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. Byron C. MEYERS, Jr., Appellant in No. 19434. Appeal of Eric DYKES in No. 19,435. Appeal of Stephen J. RUSSELL, in No. 19,436. Appeal of Edward SUBER, in No. 19,437. Appeal of Mark K. COVINGTON, in No. 19,438. Appeal of William D. ALLIE, in No. 19,439. Appeal of Julius WILLIAMS, also known as Clarence J. Williams, in No. 19,440. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. Francis BARR, Appellant in No. 19441, Tony Notts. Appeal of Tony NOTTS, in No. 19,442.
Nos. 19434, 19442.
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 21, 1971.
Decided Nov. 5, 1971.
Harry F. Swanger, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellants.
J. Kent Culley, Asst. Dist. Atty., Pittsburgh, Pa. (Robert W. Duggan, Dist. Atty. of Allegheny County, Carol Mary Los, Asst. Dist. Atty., Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.
Before ALDISERT, GIBBONS and ROSENN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
PER CURIAM:
These appeals from a remand to the state court of two petitions for removal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1443(1) present essentially the same issues previously decided by this court in Hill v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 439 F.2d 1016 (3d Cir. 1970).
The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.