Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. ROBERT THOMAS FAUNCE, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2003-09-17
Citations: 189 Or. App. 526
Docket Number: 020942M; A119080
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. ROBERT THOMAS FAUNCE, Appellant.
Judges: Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Armstrong and Brewer, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 189
Pages: 526–527

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted August 27,
reversed September 17, 2003
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. ROBERT THOMAS FAUNCE, Appellant.
020942M; A119080
76 P3d 677
Tammy W. Sun, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief was Peter A. Ozanne, Executive Director, Office of Public Defense Services.
Erika L. Hadlock, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.
Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Armstrong and Brewer, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
In this criminal case, defendant appeals a judgment of conviction on one count of disorderly conduct. ORS 166.025. He assigns error to the denial of his motion for a judgment of acquittal based on the insufficiency of the evidence. The state concedes that the trial court erred in denying the motion. We accept the state's concession.
Reversed.