Case Name: COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF STATE, Petitioner v. Micheal BACA, et al.
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2020-07-06
Citations: 140 S. Ct. 2316
Docket Number: No. 19-518
Parties: COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF STATE, Petitioner
v.
Micheal BACA, et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Supreme Court Reporter
Volume: 140
Pages: 2316–2316

Head Matter:
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF STATE, Petitioner
v.
Micheal BACA, et al.
No. 19-518
Supreme Court of the United States.
July 6, 2020
L. Lawrence Lessig, Counsel of Record, Jason Harrow, Equal Citizens, Cambridge, MA, Jason B. Wesoky, Denver, Co, Counsel for Electors, David H. Fry, J. Max Rosen, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, San Francisco, CA, for respondents.
Philip J. Weiser, Attorney General, Eric R. Olson, Solicitor General, Office of the Colorado, Attorney General, Denver, Colorado, Grant T. Sullivan, Assistant Solicitor General, Leeann Morrill, First Assistant Attorney, General, Michael D. Mcmaster, Assistant Solicitor General, Michael Kotlarczyk, Assistant Attorney General, Daniel J. De Cecco, Alexa D. Jones, Danny Rheiner, Assistant Attorney General Fellows, for petitioner.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit is reversed for the reasons stated in Chiafalo v. Washington , - U.S. -, 140 S.Ct. 2316, - L.Ed.2d -, 2020 WL 3633779 (2020).
It is so ordered.
Justice SOTOMAYOR took no part in the decision of this case.
Justice THOMAS concurs in the judgment for the reasons stated in his separate opinion in Chiafalo v. Washington, ante, p. -.