Case Name: Abe Rosenberg et al., Respondents, v. Barry M. Caruth et al., Appellants, et al., Respondents. In the Matter of the Estate of Pauline Rosenberg, Deceased. Sylvia Caruth, as Administratrix, Appellant; Abe Rosenberg et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1966-11-29
Citations: 18 N.Y.2d 910
Docket Number: 
Parties: Abe Rosenberg et al., Respondents, v. Barry M. Caruth et al., Appellants, et al., Respondents. In the Matter of the Estate of Pauline Rosenberg, Deceased. Sylvia Caruth, as Administratrix, Appellant; Abe Rosenberg et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 18
Pages: 910–910

Head Matter:
Abe Rosenberg et al., Respondents, v. Barry M. Caruth et al., Appellants, et al., Respondents. In the Matter of the Estate of Pauline Rosenberg, Deceased. Sylvia Caruth, as Administratrix, Appellant; Abe Rosenberg et al., Respondents.
Submitted November 28, 1966;
decided November 29, 1966.
Barry M. Caruth, pro se, for motion.
Monroe Qoldwater opposed.

Opinion:
Motion dismissed, with $10 costs and necessary printing disbursements, upon the ground that the determination sought to be reviewed involves a pure question of discretion of the type not reviewable by the Court of Appeals (Miranda v. City of New York, 10 N Y 2d 883).