Case Name: Demetry COLEMAN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2018-12-11
Citations: 563 S.W.3d 180
Docket Number: No. ED 106409
Parties: Demetry COLEMAN, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Mary K. Hoff, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 563
Pages: 180–180

Head Matter:
Demetry COLEMAN, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 106409
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
FILED: December 11, 2018
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: Alexandria Assareh Shah, Office of the State Public Defender, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.
ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Evan Joseph Buchheim, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.
Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Mary K. Hoff, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Demetry Coleman appeals from the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order ("Judgment") denying his Rule 24.035 motion, which alleged ineffective assistance of counsel, without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).