Case Name: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. John MATKE, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-06-15
Citations: 761 So. 2d 317
Docket Number: No. SC92476
Parties: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. John MATKE, Respondent.
Judges: HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 761
Pages: 317–317

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. John MATKE, Respondent.
No. SC92476.
Supreme Court of Florida.
June 15, 2000.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, James W. Rogers, Bureau Chief, Criminal Appeals, and L. Michael Billmeier, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, for Petitioner.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Angela Shelley, Assistant Public Defender, Second Judicial Circuit, Tallahassee, Florida, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have for review the decision in Matke v. State, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D469, — So.2d -, 1998 WL 55968 (Fla. 1st DCA Feb. 13, 1998), on the basis of certified conflict. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. For the reasons expressed in our opinion in Maddox v. State, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla.2000), we quash the decision below and find that the unpre-served sentencing error in this case regarding costs does not constitute fundamental error.
It is so ordered.
HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.