Case Name: Ameropan Realty Corporation, Respondent, v. Rangely Lakes Corp., Doing Business as Carll Burr Realty, et al., Appellants
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2001-10-18
Citations: 97 N.Y.2d 626
Docket Number: 
Parties: Ameropan Realty Corporation, Respondent, v Rangely Lakes Corp., Doing Business as Carll Burr Realty, et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 97
Pages: 626–626

Head Matter:
Ameropan Realty Corporation, Respondent, v Rangely Lakes Corp., Doing Business as Carll Burr Realty, et al., Appellants.
Submitted August 6, 2001;
decided October 18, 2001

Opinion:
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Neither the Appellate Division order, granting a motion to enforce a settlement agreement, nor the judgment entered thereon, finally determined the action within the meaning of the Constitution (see, Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, § 18 [a] [3d ed]).