Case Name: IN RE: ESTATE OF Sophia M. KRASINSKI, a/k/a Sophia Krasinski a/k/a Sofia Krasinsky, Late of Morrisdale, (Cooper Township) Clearfield County, Pennsylvania Deceased on 11/04/2006 Petition of: Patricia Krasinski-Dunzik In re: Estate of Sophia M. Krasinski a/k/a Sophia Krasinski a/k/a Sophia Krasinsky Late of Morrisdale (Cooper Township), Clearfield County, Pennsylvania Deceased November 4, 2006 Petition of: Patricia Krasinski-Dunzik
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2018-12-04
Citations: 198 A.3d 1045
Docket Number: No. 242 WAL 2018; No. 243 WAL 2018
Parties: IN RE: ESTATE OF Sophia M. KRASINSKI, a/k/a Sophia Krasinski a/k/a Sofia Krasinsky, Late of Morrisdale, (Cooper Township) Clearfield County, Pennsylvania Deceased on 11/04/2006
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 198
Pages: 1045–1045

Head Matter:
IN RE: ESTATE OF Sophia M. KRASINSKI, a/k/a Sophia Krasinski a/k/a Sofia Krasinsky, Late of Morrisdale, (Cooper Township) Clearfield County, Pennsylvania Deceased on 11/04/2006
Petition of: Patricia Krasinski-Dunzik
In re: Estate of Sophia M. Krasinski a/k/a Sophia Krasinski a/k/a Sophia Krasinsky Late of Morrisdale (Cooper Township), Clearfield County, Pennsylvania Deceased November 4, 2006
Petition of: Patricia Krasinski-Dunzik
No. 242 WAL 2018
No. 243 WAL 2018
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
December 4, 2018
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 4th day of December, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner, are:
(1) Does Pa.R.A.P. [...] 342(a)(6), which provides for an immediate appeal as of right from Orphans' Court orders "... determining an interest in real or personal property[,"] also allow or require an immediate appeal from an order of the Orphans' Court permitting or denying the personal representative the authority to sell real or personal property, such that filing the appeal from the Order confirming the [f]irst [and] [f]inal account was deemed to be a waiver of those issues?
(2) Did the Superior Court commit an error of law, and misconstrue Pa. R.A.P. [...] 342(a)(6) in its holding that an order confirming the sale of real property of a decedent's estate was an order determining an interest in real property, and that an appeal from such an order was waived if not filed within thirty [...] days of said order?
(3) Did the Superior Court commit an error of law by misconstruing Pa. R.A.P. [...] 342(a)(6), and ignoring, or otherwise failing to address controlling authority encompassed by the Superior Court decisions and holdings in In re Estate of Ash, 73 A.3d 1287 (Pa. Super. 2013), and In re Estate of Cherry, [...] 111 A.3d 1204 (Pa. Super. 2015)?