Case Name: The Borough of East Newark, respondent, v. The Mayor and Aldermen of Jersey City, appellant, and New Jersey Suburban Water Company and New York and New Jersey Water Company, respondents
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1905-11-20
Citations: 68 N.J. Eq. 783
Docket Number: 
Parties: The Borough of East Newark, respondent, v. The Mayor and Aldermen of Jersey City, appellant, and New Jersey Suburban Water Company and New York and New Jersey Water Company, respondents.
Judges: For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Fort, Gareetson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogeet, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray—10.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 68
Pages: 783–788

Head Matter:
The Borough of East Newark, respondent, v. The Mayor and Aldermen of Jersey City, appellant, and New Jersey Suburban Water Company and New York and New Jersey Water Company, respondents.
[Argued March 16th and 17th, 1905.
Decided November 20th, 1905.]
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Stevens, whose opinion is reported in 67 N. J. Eq. m&.
Mr. George L. Record and Mr. Robert Carey, for the appellant.
Messrs. Collins & Corbin and Mr. Herbert Boggs, for the respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth by Vice-Chancellor Stevens in his opinion filed in the court of chancery.