Case Name: Michelle ISENHOUR, Respondent, v. Walter ISENHOUR, Appellant.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2017-12-26
Citations: 544 S.W.3d 266
Docket Number: No. ED 104805
Parties: Michelle ISENHOUR, Respondent,
v.
Walter ISENHOUR, Appellant.
Judges: Before Colleen Dolan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 544
Pages: 266–267

Head Matter:
Michelle ISENHOUR, Respondent,
v.
Walter ISENHOUR, Appellant.
No. ED 104805
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
Filed: December 26, 2017
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied February 26, 2018
Application for Transfer Denied May 1, 2018
Melissa Featherston, 8777 Big Bend Blvd. Ste. C, St. Louis, MO 63119, For Plaintiff/Respondent.
Craig G. Kallen, 13321 N. Outer Forty Rd. Ste. 100, Town and Country, MO 63017, For Defendant/Appellant.
Before Colleen Dolan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Walter Isenhour ("Husband") appeals the trial court's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Judgment and Decree of Dissolution of Marriage that awarded him and Michelle Isenhour ("Wife") joint legal and physical custody of their children and awarded Wife a larger share of the marital financial accounts. Husband offers two points on appeal. In his first point, Husband argues that the trial court misapplied § 452.375, abused its discretion, and failed to order custody consistent with the children's best interests by awarding joint physical custody with Wife designated as the residential parent. In his second point, Husband claims that the trial court misapplied § 452.330 and abused its discretion by awarding Wife a disproportionately large share of the marital funds. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).