Case Name: Prentiss R. FULTON, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2014-03-25
Citations: 425 S.W.3d 221
Docket Number: No. WD 76117
Parties: Prentiss R. FULTON, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Division Two: GARY D. WITT, Presiding Judge, LISA WHITE HARDWICK and ALOK AHUJA, Judges.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 425
Pages: 221–222

Head Matter:
Prentiss R. FULTON, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 76117.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
March 25, 2014.
Amy M. Bartholow, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Shaun Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before Division Two: GARY D. WITT, Presiding Judge, LISA WHITE HARDWICK and ALOK AHUJA, Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Prentiss R. Fulton, Jr., appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. He contends that the motion court erred in failing to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law on all of the claims raised in his amended motion, and he asks that we reverse and remand the judgment to the motion court with instructions to address all of his claims. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provide to the parties, we find no error and affirm the post-conviction judgment. Rule 84.16(b).