Case Name: James GERDING, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-06-10
Citations: 108 S.W.3d 124
Docket Number: No. ED 81304
Parties: James GERDING, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, C.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and ROBERT R. DOWD, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 108
Pages: 124–125

Head Matter:
James GERDING, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 81304.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
June 10, 2003.
Mary S. Choi, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Karen L. Kramer, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, C.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and ROBERT R. DOWD, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
James Gerding ("Movant") appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the motion court's determination that Movant's claims are refuted by the record is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would be of no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a brief memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).