Case Name: HENDRICK v. HENDRICK
Court: Michigan Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Michigan
Decision Date: 1929-06-03
Citations: 247 Mich. 327
Docket Number: Docket No. 1, Calendar No. 34,105
Parties: HENDRICK v. HENDRICK.
Judges: North, C. J., and Fead, Fellows, Wiest, McDonald, Potter, and Sharpe, JJ., concurred.
Reporter: Michigan Reports
Volume: 247
Pages: 327–329

Head Matter:
HENDRICK v. HENDRICK.
1. Divorce — Extreme Cruelty.
On husband’s bill and wife’s .cross-bill for divorce, he is entitled to decree where evidence showed that wife had been guilty of extreme and repeated cruelty in attending dances with other men and in riding with and consorting with them, and she made no cáse.
2. Same — Support por Legally Adopted Minor Properly Decreed.
In suit for divorce, it was proper to decree support for legally adopted minor child.
3. Same — Adoptive Mother Preferred for Custody of Three-year Old Child.
In suit for divorce, adoptive mother is preferred respecting custody of three-year old child, but decree in this regard may be modified later as occasion may require.
Appeal from Muskegon; Vanderwerp (John), J.
Submitted April 2, 1929.
(Docket No. 1, Calendar No. 34,105.)
Decided June 3, 1929.
Bill by John M. Hendrick against Margaret M. Hendrick for divorce. From decree of divorce for defendant on her cross-bill, plaintiff appeals.
Decree modified to award divorce to plaintiff, and affirmed.
Willard G. Turner, Jr. (Raymond J. Engle and R. Burr Cochran, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Opinion:
Clark, J.
The parties are husband and wife. They have no children except a girl three years old whom they adopted.
The plaintiff's bill for divorce charges cruelty, chiefly that defendant consorted with other men. Defendant filed answer and croSs-bill charging nonsupport.
Defendant had decree awarding her divorce, custody of the child, and a small periodical allowance, four dollars a week, toward support of herself and child. Plaintiff has appealed.
Plaintiff alone made case for divorce. The record is persuasive that defendant, in attending dances with other men, in riding with and consorting with them, has been guilty of extreme and répeated cruelty toward plaintiff. See Bearinger v. Bearinger, 170 Mich. 661; Eistedt v. Eistedt, 187 Mich. 371.
The decree will be modified to award divorce to plaintiff. The child has a good home with defendant's parents. It'was proper to decree support for a legally adopted child. Burk v. Burk, 222 Mich. 149. And the adoptive mother is preferred respecting this child of tender years. Carlson v. Carlson, 237 Mich. 105. Of course, the decree in this regard may be modified later as occasion may require.
The decree, so modified, is affirmed, without costs.
North, C. J., and Fead, Fellows, Wiest, McDonald, Potter, and Sharpe, JJ., concurred.