Case Name: George VAN WAGNER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BRANCH BANKING & TRUST COMPANY, Respondent-Appellee, Thomas H. Fluharty, Trustee-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-08-29
Citations: 444 F. App'x 665
Docket Number: No. 11-1204
Parties: George VAN WAGNER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BRANCH BANKING & TRUST COMPANY, Respondent-Appellee, Thomas H. Fluharty, Trustee-Appellee.
Judges: Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Bankruptcy Reporter
Volume: 463
Pages: 665–665

Head Matter:
George VAN WAGNER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BRANCH BANKING & TRUST COMPANY, Respondent-Appellee, Thomas H. Fluharty, Trustee-Appellee.
No. 11-1204.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 25, 2011.
Decided: Aug. 29, 2011.
George Van Wagner, Appellant Pro Se. William L. Hallam, Rosenberg, Martin & Greenberg, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d) (2006).

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
George Van Wagner seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion for leave to appeal an interlocutory order issued by the bankruptcy court. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Van Wagner seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.