Case Name: Gena O'NEAL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John O. BRENNAN, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-09-11
Citations: 615 F. App'x 802
Docket Number: No. 15-1622
Parties: Gena O’NEAL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John O. BRENNAN, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 615
Pages: 802–802

Head Matter:
Gena O’NEAL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John O. BRENNAN, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 15-1622.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 9, 2015.
Decided: Sept. 11, 2015.
Gena O’Neal, Appellant Pro Se. R. Joseph Sher, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Gena O'Neal appeals the district court's order granting Defendant's motion to dismiss her action alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. § 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2012 & Supp.2015). On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because O'Neal's informal brief does not challenge the bases for the district court's disposition, O'Neil has forfeited appellate review 'of the court's order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.