Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Armando MARAVILLA-BRISENO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-04-11
Citations: 685 F. App'x 304
Docket Number: No. 16-41055 Summary Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Armando MARAVILLA-BRISENO, Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before JOLLY, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 685
Pages: 304–305

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Armando MARAVILLA-BRISENO, Defendant-Appellant
No. 16-41055 Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed April 11, 2017
Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Armando Maravilla-Briseno, Pro Se
Before JOLLY, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Armando Maravilla-Briseno has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Maravilla-Briseno has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 6th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.