Case Name: In re HAGGERTY et al.
Court: Louisiana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1947-04-21
Citations: 30 So. 2d 425
Docket Number: No. 38115
Parties: In re HAGGERTY et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 30
Pages: 425–426

Head Matter:
211 La. 546
In re HAGGERTY et al.
No. 38115.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
April 21, 1947.
Graham & Graham and George S. Graham, all of New Orleans, for defendants, appellants.
Fred S. LeBlanc, Atty. Gen., M. E. Cul-ligan, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Plerve Raci-vitch, Dist. Atty., and Geo. McCulloch and Alexander E. Ralston, Jr., Asst. Dist. Attys., all of New Orleans, for appellee.

Opinion:
PONDER, Justice.
On the petition of the Chief Probation Officer, the minors, Evangeline, Beverly, June and Alvina Haggerty, children of Alvin Haggerty and his wife, were decreed to be neglected children. The Juvenile Court placed Evangeline and Beverly Hag-gerty in custody of the Associated Catholic Charities, and June and Alvina Hag-gerty in custody of the Department of Public Welfare. An appeal was taken to this Court on behalf of Beverly, June and Alvina Plaggerty, assisted by their mother, through their attorneys. The appeal has been submitted on briefs for our determination.
Upon examination of the record, we find that we cannot pronounce satisfactorily and definitely on this cause in its present state, and the case should be remanded to the Juvenile Court for the admittance of additional evidence.
While it is stated in the record that a certain affidavit, signed by Beverly Plag-gerty, was admitted in evidence, there is no such instrument in the transcript. Counsel for the minors states in his brief that Evangeline, the principal witness for the State, has subsequently repudiated her testimony. In the interest of substantial justice this cause should be remanded for the purpose of permitting 'both the State and counsel for thé minors to introduce any and all evidence tending to show the true situation as it now exists. The evidence already admitted should remain in the record.
For the reasons assigned, the judgment is reversed and set aside. The case is remanded to have any and all further admissible evidence admitted, for a decision thereon by the court a qua, and to be appealed from if the party or parties cast so elect. It is further ordered that the evidence already adduced remain filed.