Case Name: John Sterling PETTENGILL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF RICHWOOD'S FEDERAL SEWER PROJECT; West Virginia Development Office; The Sewer Technical Review Committee, of West Virginia's Department of Environmental Protection, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-06-15
Citations: 326 F. App'x 200
Docket Number: No. 08-2319
Parties: John Sterling PETTENGILL, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. CITY OF RICHWOOD’S FEDERAL SEWER PROJECT; West Virginia Development Office; The Sewer Technical Review Committee, of West Virginia’s Department of Environmental Protection, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 326
Pages: 200–200

Head Matter:
John Sterling PETTENGILL, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. CITY OF RICHWOOD’S FEDERAL SEWER PROJECT; West Virginia Development Office; The Sewer Technical Review Committee, of West Virginia’s Department of Environmental Protection, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 08-2319.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 22, 2009.
Decided: June 15, 2009.
John Sterling Pettengill, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
John Sterling Pettengill appeals the district court's order denying his motions to reopen his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Pettengill v. City of Richwood's Fed. Sewer Project, No. 2:07-cv-00290 (S.D.W.Va. Nov. 13, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.