Case Name: Jamaal GITTENS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of SOUTH CAROLINA, Defendant-Appellee; Jamaal Gittens, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of South Carolina, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-02-29
Citations: 633 F. App'x 840
Docket Number: Nos. 15-2206, 15-2294
Parties: Jamaal GITTENS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of SOUTH CAROLINA, Defendant-Appellee. Jamaal Gittens, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of South Carolina, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 633
Pages: 840–841

Head Matter:
Jamaal GITTENS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of SOUTH CAROLINA, Defendant-Appellee. Jamaal Gittens, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of South Carolina, Defendant-Appellee.
Nos. 15-2206, 15-2294.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 25, 2016.
Decided: Feb. 29, 2016.
Jamaal Gittens, Appellant Pro Se.
Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jamaal Gittens appeals the district court's orders accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaints. We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gittens v. South Carolina, No. 3:15-cv-02841-MGL (D.S.C. Sept. 30, 2015); Gittens v. South Carolina, No. 6:15-cv-03108-MGL (D.S.C. Oct. 8, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.