Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Albert RANDOLPH, a/k/a Spo, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-04-22
Citations: 518 F. App'x 230
Docket Number: No. 12-8108
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Albert RANDOLPH, a/k/a Spo, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 518
Pages: 230–231

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Albert RANDOLPH, a/k/a Spo, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-8108.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 18, 2013.
Decided: April 22, 2013.
Albert Randolph, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Sinclair Duffy, Robert E. Trono, Assistant United States Attorneys, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Albert Randolph appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for sentencing transcripts. The district court's order was entered on November 26, 2012. However, on January 22, 2013, the district court granted Randolph's subsequent motion for sentencing transcripts. As Randolph has already received the relief he seeks, we dismiss the appeal as moot. We deny Randolph's motion to vacate his conviction and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.