Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Carlos Bustamante PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-12-13
Citations: 453 F. App'x 490
Docket Number: No. 11-10243
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Carlos Bustamante PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING, JOLLY, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 453
Pages: 490–490

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Carlos Bustamante PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-10243
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 13, 2011.
Nancy E. Larson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Lydia M. Brandt, Esq., Brandt Law Firm, P.C., Richardson, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before KING, JOLLY, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Carlos Bustamante Perez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Bustamante Perez has filed a response. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Bustamante Perez's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; such a claim generally "cannot be resolved on direct appeal when the claim has not been raised before the district court since no opportunity existed to develop the record on the merits of the allegations." United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir.2006) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Bustamante Perez's response. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, Bustamante Perez's motion to appoint new counsel is DENIED, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.