Case Name: AGRIBANK, FCB, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Loicy J. BLANKENSHIP and Mary E. Blankenship, Defendants/Appellants
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-07-27
Citations: 1 S.W.3d 594
Docket Number: No. 74633
Parties: AGRIBANK, FCB, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Loicy J. BLANKENSHIP and Mary E. Blankenship, Defendants/Appellants.
Judges: Before RHODES RUSSELL, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 1
Pages: 594–595

Head Matter:
AGRIBANK, FCB, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Loicy J. BLANKENSHIP and Mary E. Blankenship, Defendants/Appellants.
No. 74633.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Southern Division.
July 27, 1999.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Sept. 14, 1999.
Application for Transfer Denied Oct. 26, 1999.
James E. Spain, Poplar Bluff, Gerald Leon Warren, Clayton, for appellant.
Robert P. Schmidt, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before RHODES RUSSELL, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Debtors appeal from the trial court's granting of summary judgment in favor of bank in its petition to recover on a promissory note. No error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value.
However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).