Case Name: MALTINA CORPORATION and Julio Blanco-Herrera, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CAWY BOTTLING COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1974-04-04
Citations: 491 F.2d 1391
Docket Number: No. 73-2145
Parties: MALTINA CORPORATION and Julio Blanco-Herrera, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CAWY BOTTLING COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before ALDRICH, Senior Circuit Judge, BELL and GEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 491
Pages: 1391–1391

Head Matter:
MALTINA CORPORATION and Julio Blanco-Herrera, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CAWY BOTTLING COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 73-2145.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 4, 1974.
Peter M. Lopez, Miami, Fla., for defendant-appellant.
J. W. Gipple, Washington, D. C., Fowler, White, Humkey, Burnett, Hurley & Banick, Miami, Fla., for plaintiffs-appellees. ,
Before ALDRICH, Senior Circuit Judge, BELL and GEE, Circuit Judges.
Hon. Bailey Aldrich, Senior Circuit Judge of the First Circuit, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
This is an appeal from the judgment for appellees entered by the district court after our decision on the prior appeal. Maltina Corporation v. Cawy Bottling Company, 5 Cir., 1972, 462 F.2d 1021. We are now presented with the tag end questions which were resolved by the district court following remand. We conclude that the trademark was not assigned in gross; that the trademark was not abandoned by non-use or otherwise ; and that the district court did not err in concluding that there was an inadequate basis for cancelling the trademark because of the affidavit of use filed pursuant to 15 U.S.C.A. § 1058(a).
Affirmed.