Case Name: Stephen TETRO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-07-17
Citations: 581 So. 2d 1009
Docket Number: No. 90-3001
Parties: Stephen TETRO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: HERSEY, STONE and GARRETT, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 581
Pages: 1009–1009

Head Matter:
Stephen TETRO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 90-3001.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
July 17, 1991.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Tanja Ostapoff, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Douglas J. Glaid, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. However, we remand so the judgment can be corrected. The state concedes that the written sentences do not conform to the trial judge's oral pronouncements at sentencing. Avery v. State, 543 So.2d 296 (Fla. 5th DCA), appeal dismissed, 553 So.2d 1164 (1989) (when written orders are inconsistent with oral pronouncements made at sentencing, the oral pronouncements prevail). The written judgment should be corrected to reflect that as to counts II, III and IV the trial judge imposed sentences of forty years in prison concurrent with each other, but consecutive to the sentence imposed on count I.
HERSEY, STONE and GARRETT, JJ., concur.