Case Name: EMPLOYEES' MUTUAL ASSOCIATION OF CHICAGO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent; ARMOUR & COMPANY, a Corporation, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1938-10-10
Citations: 105 F.2d 1016
Docket Number: Nos. 6762, 6769
Parties: EMPLOYEES’ MUTUAL ASSOCIATION OF CHICAGO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. ARMOUR & COMPANY, a Corporation, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 105
Pages: 1016–1017

Head Matter:
EMPLOYEES’ MUTUAL ASSOCIATION OF CHICAGO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. ARMOUR & COMPANY, a Corporation, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.
Nos. 6762, 6769.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Oct. 10, 1938.
Euclid Louis Taylor and J. Warren McCaffrey, both of Chicago, 111., for petitioners.
Charles Fahy, of Washington, D. C., for respondent.
Before EVANS, SPARKS, MAJOR, and TREANOR, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER^ CURIAM.
Petitioners' applications for an injunction pending the disposition of this appeal must be denied upon the authority of In the Matter of the Petition of the National Labor Relations Board for a Writ of Prohibition and for a Writ of Mandamus, decided by the Supreme Court May 31, 1938, 304 U.S. 486, 58 S.Ct. 1001, 82 L.Ed. 1482, and New York Handkerchief Mfg. Company v. National Labor Relations Board, 7 Cir., 97 F.2d 1010, decided by this court May 27, 1938. While the facts, and in some respects the issues are different, we are convinced that the Supreme Court decision is applicable and governs.
The order denying the applications for injunction will be entered.