Case Name: In the Matter of the Application of The City of New York, Acting by and Through the Commissioner of Docks, Relative to Acquiring Right and Title to and Possession of Certain Lands, etc., that Are Not Now Owned by The City of New York, Together with the Riparian, Franchise and Incorporeal Rights Appurtenant to Such Lands Situated Along the Northerly Shore of Jamaica Bay in the Boroughs of Brooklyn and Queens, in The City of New York, etc., for the Improvement of the Waterfront of The City of New York, Pursuant to a Plan Heretofore Determined upon by the Commissioner of Docks and Approved by the Commissioners of the Sinking Fund. Parcel 10. Harry A. Hanbury, Appellant; The City of New York, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1937-03-19
Citations: 250 A.D. 775
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Application of The City of New York, Acting by and Through the Commissioner of Docks, Relative to Acquiring Right and Title to and Possession of Certain Lands, etc., that Are Not Now Owned by The City of New York, Together with the Riparian, Franchise and Incorporeal Rights Appurtenant to Such Lands Situated Along the Northerly Shore of Jamaica Bay in the Boroughs of Brooklyn and Queens, in The City of New York, etc., for the Improvement of the Waterfront of The City of New York, Pursuant to a Plan Heretofore Determined upon by the Commissioner of Docks and Approved by the Commissioners of the Sinking Fund. Parcel 10. Harry A. Hanbury, Appellant; The City of New York, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 250
Pages: 775–775

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Application of The City of New York, Acting by and Through the Commissioner of Docks, Relative to Acquiring Right and Title to and Possession of Certain Lands, etc., that Are Not Now Owned by The City of New York, Together with the Riparian, Franchise and Incorporeal Rights Appurtenant to Such Lands Situated Along the Northerly Shore of Jamaica Bay in the Boroughs of Brooklyn and Queens, in The City of New York, etc., for the Improvement of the Waterfront of The City of New York, Pursuant to a Plan Heretofore Determined upon by the Commissioner of Docks and Approved by the Commissioners of the Sinking Fund. Parcel 10. Harry A. Hanbury, Appellant; The City of New York, Respondent.

Opinion:
Motion for reargument denied. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. [See ante, p. 124.] Present -— Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Close, JJ.