Case Name: Hanno KAKOSCH, Appellant v. Peter LOSCHER, CEO, Siemens Corporation (DC), et al., Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-10-30
Citations: 540 F. App'x 5
Docket Number: No. 13-7099
Parties: Hanno KAKOSCH, Appellant v. Peter LOSCHER, CEO, Siemens Corporation (DC), et al., Appellees
Judges: BEFORE: HENDERSON, GRIFFITH, and KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 540
Pages: 5–6

Head Matter:
Hanno KAKOSCH, Appellant v. Peter LOSCHER, CEO, Siemens Corporation (DC), et al., Appellees
No. 13-7099.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Oct. 30, 2013.
Hanno Kakosch, United Kingdom, pro se.
BEFORE: HENDERSON, GRIFFITH, and KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief and appendix filed by appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's order filed June 13, 2013, be affirmed. The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the complaint as frivolous. See, e.g., Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 32-33, 112 S.Ct. 1728, 118 L.Ed.2d 340 (1992).
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.