Case Name: IN THE MATTER OF KEVIN E. PERRY
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 2005-01-10
Citations: 278 Ga. 866
Docket Number: S05Y0463
Parties: IN THE MATTER OF KEVIN E. PERRY.
Judges: All the Justices concur.
Reporter: Georgia Reports
Volume: 278
Pages: 866–866

Head Matter:
S05Y0463.
IN THE MATTER OF KEVIN E. PERRY.
(607 SE2d 889)
Decided January 10, 2005.
William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, K. Gene Chapman, Assistant General Counsel State Bar, for State Bar of Georgia.

Opinion:
Per curiam.
Kevin E. Perry, a resident of Dallas, Texas, has been a member of the State Bar of Georgia since 1985. In September 2001, the Commission for Lawyer Discipline of the State Bar of Texas disbarred Perry from the practice of law in Texas based on its conclusion in five disciplinary proceedings that Perry had violated the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct involving client communication, diligence (abandonment of a client matter), improper withdrawal from representation, safekeeping client property, and misconduct involving fraud and deception.
On April 29, 2004, the State Bar of Georgia filed a Formal Complaint against Perry seeking his disbarment from the State Bar of Georgia under Rule 9.4 of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct which states in part that disbarment or suspension by another jurisdiction is a ground for discipline in the State of Georgia. Perry was personally served by a Texas constable and did not file an answer to the Formal Complaint. As a result of Perry's failure to respond, the facts alleged were deemed admitted under Bar Rule 4-212 (a). The Special Master appointed by this Court concluded Perry violated Rule 9.4 and recommended Perry be disbarred from the practice of law in Georgia.
Based on our review of the record, we conclude Perry violated Rule 9.4 of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct and that disbarment is the appropriate sanction for his conduct. Accordingly, the name of Kevin E. Perry hereby is removed from the rolls of persons entitled to practice law in Georgia. Perry is reminded of his duties under Bar Rule 4-219 (c).
Disbarred.
All the Justices concur.