Case Name: Thomas A. SNOWDEN, Appellant, v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION and Lenzar Electro Optic, Inc., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1994-09-09
Citations: 641 So. 2d 974
Docket Number: No. 94-1735
Parties: Thomas A. SNOWDEN, Appellant, v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION and Lenzar Electro Optic, Inc., Appellees.
Judges: HERSEY, GLICKSTEIN and FARMER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 641
Pages: 974–974

Head Matter:
Thomas A. SNOWDEN, Appellant, v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION and Lenzar Electro Optic, Inc., Appellees.
No. 94-1735.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Sept. 9, 1994.
Thomas A. Snowden, pro se appellant.
Geri Atkinson-Hazelton, Gen. Counsel, Tallahassee, for appellee Unemployment Appeals Com’n.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We treat appellant's July 18, 1994 statement as the initial brief. Upon consideration of the initial brief, we summarily affirm under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315.
HERSEY, GLICKSTEIN and FARMER, JJ., concur.