Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Israel Martinez NAVA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-10-18
Citations: 151 F. App'x 533
Docket Number: No. 04-50463
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Israel Martinez NAVA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: T.G. NELSON, WARDLAW, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 151
Pages: 533–534

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Israel Martinez NAVA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 04-50463.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 11, 2005.
Decided Oct. 18, 2005.
Matthew Umhofer, Esq., USLA-Office of the U.S. Attorney Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Davina Chen, FPDCA-Federal Public Defender’s Office (Los Angeles), Los An-geles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: T.G. NELSON, WARDLAW, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Israel Martinez Nava appeals the 70-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b)(2). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a). Because appellant was sentenced under mandatory Sentencing Guidelines, we remand for further proceedings consistent with United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez, 419 F.3d 906, 916 (9th Cir.2005) (extending Ame-line's limited remand procedure to cases involving non-constitutional error under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005)).
REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.