Case Name: AZCO REALTY, INC., Appellant, v. The VILLAGE AT GULFSTREAM PARK, etc., et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2014-11-19
Citations: 152 So. 3d 690
Docket Number: Nos. 3D14-0984, 3D14-0005
Parties: AZCO REALTY, INC., Appellant, v. The VILLAGE AT GULFSTREAM PARK, etc., et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before SHEPHERD, C.J., and EMAS and SCALES, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 152
Pages: 690–691

Head Matter:
AZCO REALTY, INC., Appellant, v. The VILLAGE AT GULFSTREAM PARK, etc., et al., Appellees.
Nos. 3D14-0984, 3D14-0005.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 19, 2014.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 9, 2015.
Katz, Barron, Squitero, Faust, Fried-berg, English & Allen and Jon W. Zeder, for appellant.
Wicker, Smith, O’Hara, McCoy & Ford and Shelley H. Leinicke and Jonathon S. Miller (Ft. Lauderdale), for appellees, The Village of Gulfstream Park, LLC and Forest City Commercial Group, Inc.; Egozi & Bennett and Bernard L. Egozi and Issac S. Lew (Aventura), for appellees, Burn World-Wide, Inc. d/b/a BGT Partners and David Clarke.
Before SHEPHERD, C.J., and EMAS and SCALES, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Geneva Inv., Ltd. v. Trafalgar Developers, Ltd., 274 So.2d 581 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); Bradley v. Banks, 260 So.2d 256, 256 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972) ("The appellee was entitled to summary judgment on plaintiffs' claim for a portion of a real estate commission because there was no genuine issue of material fact concerning the proposition that [plaintiff-appellant] was not registered as a real estate broker or salesman at the time the act or service was performed.").