Case Name: Napoleon HARTSFIELD, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Charlie Hourihan, Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-11-08
Citations: 253 F. App'x 620
Docket Number: No. 06-2724
Parties: Napoleon HARTSFIELD, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Charlie Hourihan, Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 253
Pages: 620–621

Head Matter:
Napoleon HARTSFIELD, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Charlie Hourihan, Appellees.
No. 06-2724.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 5, 2007.
Filed: Nov. 8, 2007.
Napoleon Hartsfield, Anamosa, IA, pro se.
Kristin Wright Ensign, Attorney General’s Office, Des Moines, IA, for Appellees.
Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Napoleon Hartsfield appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment to the remaining defendant in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action following this court's remand for further proceedings on a retaliation claim. We conclude that summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable James E. Gritzner, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.