Case Name: William E. SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Correctional Officer BERLIN; Correctional Officer Marcum; Correctional Officer Blankenship; Correctional Officer Goodwin; Correctional Officer Vanmeter; Correctional Officer Lambert; Michael Clark, Defendants-Appellees, and West Virginia Regional Jail & Correctional Facility Authority; Southwestern Regional Jail; Correctional Officer Blevins; Correctional Officer Tootal; Correctional Officer Jane Doe, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-01-27
Citations: 591 F. App'x 209
Docket Number: No. 14-7536
Parties: William E. SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Correctional Officer BERLIN; Correctional Officer Marcum; Correctional Officer Blankenship; Correctional Officer Goodwin; Correctional Officer Vanmeter; Correctional Officer Lambert; Michael Clark, Defendants-Appellees, and West Virginia Regional Jail & Correctional Facility Authority; Southwestern Regional Jail; Correctional Officer Blevins; Correctional Officer Tootal; Correctional Officer Jane Doe, Defendants.
Judges: Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 591
Pages: 209–209

Head Matter:
William E. SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Correctional Officer BERLIN; Correctional Officer Marcum; Correctional Officer Blankenship; Correctional Officer Goodwin; Correctional Officer Vanmeter; Correctional Officer Lambert; Michael Clark, Defendants-Appellees, and West Virginia Regional Jail & Correctional Facility Authority; Southwestern Regional Jail; Correctional Officer Blevins; Correctional Officer Tootal; Correctional Officer Jane Doe, Defendants.
No. 14-7536.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 22, 2015.
Decided: Jan. 27, 2015.
William E. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Tim J. Yianne, Mannion Gray, Charleston, West Virginia; John P. Fuller, James William Marshall, III, Bailey & Wyant, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Ap-pellees.
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
William E. Smith seeks to appeal the district court's order granting partial summary judgment to Appellees on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) suit. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Smith seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.