Case Name: Richard RUDISILL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Warden Craig APKER, Warden, FMC Butner, Respondent-Appellee, and United States of America, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-05-30
Citations: 690 F. App'x 135
Docket Number: No. 15-6176
Parties: Richard RUDISILL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Warden Craig APKER, Warden, FMC Butner, Respondent-Appellee, and United States of America, Respondent.
Judges: Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 690
Pages: 135–135

Head Matter:
Richard RUDISILL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Warden Craig APKER, Warden, FMC Butner, Respondent-Appellee, and United States of America, Respondent.
No. 15-6176
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 25, 2017
Decided: May 30, 2017
Richard Donnell Rudisill, Appellant Pro Se. Seth Morgan Wood, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Richard Donnell Rudisill, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rudisill v. Apker, No. 5:12-hc-02311-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 12, 2015). We dispensé with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED