Case Name: SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, and Johnny Belsome; Timothy Allen; Jody Hinkley; Donald Marcel; Keith Hinkley; Starr Atchison; Edward Thiel; Brett Hunter; Tara Belsome, and those similarly situated, Movants-Appellants, v. REX VENTURE GROUP, LLC, d/b/a Zeekrewards.com; Receiver for Rex Ventures Group, LLC, Defendants-Appellees, and Paul R. Burks; Trudy Gilmond; Kellie King, Defendants, and Nathaniel Woods, Movant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-01-07
Citations: 589 F. App'x 157
Docket Number: No. 14-1710
Parties: SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, and Johnny Belsome; Timothy Allen; Jody Hinkley; Donald Marcel; Keith Hinkley; Starr Atchison; Edward Thiel; Brett Hunter; Tara Belsome, and those similarly situated, Movants-Appellants, v. REX VENTURE GROUP, LLC, d/b/a Zeekrewards.com; Receiver for Rex Ventures Group, LLC, Defendants-Appellees, and Paul R. Burks; Trudy Gilmond; Kellie King, Defendants, and Nathaniel Woods, Movant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 589
Pages: 157–157

Head Matter:
SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, and Johnny Belsome; Timothy Allen; Jody Hinkley; Donald Marcel; Keith Hinkley; Starr Atchison; Edward Thiel; Brett Hunter; Tara Belsome, and those similarly situated, Movants-Appellants, v. REX VENTURE GROUP, LLC, d/b/a Zeekrewards.com; Receiver for Rex Ventures Group, LLC, Defendants-Appellees, and Paul R. Burks; Trudy Gilmond; Kellie King, Defendants, and Nathaniel Woods, Movant.
No. 14-1710.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 22, 2014.
Decided: Jan. 7, 2015.
Marc R. Michaud, New Orleans, Louisiana, for Appellants. Irving M. Brenner, Kenneth D. Bell, Matthew E. Orso, McGuirewoods, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Johnny Belsome, et al., appeal from the district court's order clarifying a prior order and directing that any payments made by the Receiver be sent to a claimant's home address rather than any third party, including attorneys. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order the Appellants seek to appeal is neither a final order nor an ap-pealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.