Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. HAROLD LEE HOP, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1982-08-11
Citations: 58 Or. App. 527
Docket Number: No. 82-936-C, CA A24187
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. HAROLD LEE HOP, Appellant.
Judges: Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Thornton and Van Hoomissen, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 58
Pages: 527–528

Head Matter:
Submitted on record and briefs July 9,
reversed and remanded August 11, 1982
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. HAROLD LEE HOP, Appellant.
(No. 82-936-C, CA A24187)
648 P2d 1362
Steven P. Pickens, Medford, filed the brief for appellant.
Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, William F. Gary, Solicitor General, and Christine L. Dickey, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Thornton and Van Hoomissen, Judges.
PER CURIAM.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals his conviction after a plea of guilty. He contends that the court erred in not allowing him to withdraw his plea of guilty on the ground that he was not adequately advised of the consequences of a guilty plea as required by ORS 135.385(2)(a). The state concedes that the advice was inadequate but contends defendant cannot raise that issue on appeal from a guilty plea. The issue raised is cognizable on appeal. State v. Dawson, 57 Or App 420, 644 P2d 665 (1982); State v. Reichert, 39 Or App 905, 593 P2d 1298 (1979).
Reversed and remanded.