Case Name: Juan RISCAJCHE-GONZALEZ, Petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-10-04
Citations: 669 F. App'x 450
Docket Number: No. 15-70548
Parties: Juan RISCAJCHE-GONZALEZ, Petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 669
Pages: 450–451

Head Matter:
Juan RISCAJCHE-GONZALEZ, Petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 15-70548
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted September 27, 2016
Filed October 04, 2016
Juan Riscajche-Gonzalez, Pro Se
Joanna L. Watson, Trial Attorney, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent
Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Juan Riscajche-Gonzalez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions'pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order denying his motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition for review.
In his opening brief, Riscajche-Gonzalez does not raise, and therefore has waived, any challenge to the BIA's dispositive determination that it lacked jurisdiction to consider his motion to reopen. See Lopez-Vasquez v. Holder, 706 F.3d 1072, 1079-80 (9th Cir. 2013) (a petitioner waives a contention by failing to raise it in the opening brief).
In light of this disposition, we do not reach Riscajche-Gonzalez' contentions regarding eligibility for relief.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provid ed by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3,