Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles Thomas ROSS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-10-28
Citations: 399 F. App'x 830
Docket Number: No. 10-7134
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles Thomas ROSS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 399
Pages: 830–831

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles Thomas ROSS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-7134.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 19, 2010.
Decided: Oct. 28, 2010.
Charles Thomas Ross, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Westley Haynie, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Ap-pellee.
Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Charles Thomas Ross appeals the district court's order denying his motion filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Ross, No. 2:06-cr00056-RBS-FBS-1 (E.D. Va. June 22, 2010); see United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233 (4th Cir.2010) (holding district court lacked authority to grant defendant's motion to reconsider seeking further reduction of his sentence). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.