Case Name: MOORE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Edward F. PONATH, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1926-10-20
Citations: 14 F.2d 1022
Docket Number: No. 3718
Parties: MOORE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Edward F. PONATH, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 14
Pages: 1022–1022

Head Matter:
MOORE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Edward F. PONATH, Appellee.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
October 20, 1926.)
No. 3718.
Joshua R. H. Potts, of Chicago, Ill., for appellant.
Arthur C. Eckert, of St. Louis, Mo., for appellee.
Before ALSCHULER, EVANS, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant (defendant in District Court) complains of the refusal of the District Court to grant an injunction pendente lite, restraining appellee from notifying the public that he had begun suits against alleged infringers of the patent sued on, and from sending out advertising matter describing the patent as a "pioneer" invention.
We find nothing in the record to convince us that in its action in that behalf the District Court transgressed or abused that sound discretion which in such matters it may and should exercise.
The order appealed from is affirmed.