Case Name: Gary DuPONT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2014-08-26
Citations: 447 S.W.3d 736
Docket Number: No. ED 100298
Parties: Gary DuPONT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before KURT S. ODENWALD, P.J. and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR. arid GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 447
Pages: 736–736

Head Matter:
Gary DuPONT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 100298.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District.
Aug. 26, 2014.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 2, 2014.
Application for Transfer Denied Nov. 25, 2014.
Amy E. Lowe, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Jennifer A. Rodewald, Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before KURT S. ODENWALD, P.J. and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR. arid GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Gary DuPont ("Movant") appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant argues the motion court clearly erred in denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief because the plea court accepted his plea to unenhanced first-degree statutory sodomy and then allowed him to be sentenced pursuant to the enhanced provisions of first-degree statutory sodomy.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm. An opinion would have no prece-dential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).