Case Name: State of Wisconsin v. State of Illinois and Sanitary District of Chicago; State of New York v. State of Illinois and Sanitary District of Chicago
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1926-11-23
Citations: 273 U.S. 642
Docket Number: No. 7; No. 14
Parties: State of Wisconsin v. State of Illinois and Sanitary District of Chicago; State of New York v. State of Illinois and Sanitary District of Chicago.
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 273
Pages: 642–643

Head Matter:
No. 7,
No. 14,
original.
original.
State of Wisconsin v. State of Illinois and Sanitary District of Chicago; State of New York v. State of Illinois and Sanitary District of Chicago.
Motion submitted November 1, 1926.
Decided November 23, 1926.
Messrs. Albert Ottinger, Attorney General of New York, and C. S. Ferris for New York, in support of the motion.
Messrs. Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney Gen eral of Illinois, Cyrus E. Dietz, Hugh S. Johnson, James M. Beck, Hector A. Brouillet, and Morton S. Cressy for defendants.

Opinion:
Upon. motion of the State of New York, it is ordered that the parties to the suit of the State of New York v. State of Illinois and Sanitary District of Chicago be permitted to participate in the taking of evidence in the hearing before the special master heretofore appointed in the case .of the State of Wisconsin v. State of Illinois and Sanitary District of Chicago, in like manner as if those suits had been consolidated; and the court reserves to itself authority to order such a consolidation if it becomes proper to do so. But this order is made without prejudice to the authority of the court hereafter to make, any order which it may deem proper respecting the matters set forth in the third paragraph of the bill of complaint in the case of the State of New York v. State of Illinois and Sanitary District of Chicago, and respecting the issues that may arise from the presence of that paragraph in that bill of complaint.