Case Name: Mona J. Hurst, appellant, v. Robert H. Hurst, appellee
Court: Nebraska Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Nebraska
Decision Date: 1989-09-22
Citations: 233 Neb. 426
Docket Number: No. 87-1064
Parties: Mona J. Hurst, appellant, v. Robert H. Hurst, appellee.
Judges: Hastings, C.J., Boslaugh, White, Caporale, Shanahan, Grant, and Fahrnbruch, JJ.
Reporter: Nebraska Reports
Volume: 233
Pages: 426–427

Head Matter:
Mona J. Hurst, appellant, v. Robert H. Hurst, appellee.
445 N.W.2d 889
Filed September 22, 1989.
No. 87-1064.
Patrick Kelly, Sarpy County Attorney, and Anthony C. Nanfito for appellant.
No appearance for appellee.
Hastings, C.J., Boslaugh, White, Caporale, Shanahan, Grant, and Fahrnbruch, JJ.

Opinion:
Boslaugh, J.
This case presents the same question as Wilson v. Ransom, post p. 427, 446 N.W.2d 6 (1989), which was decided today. For the reasons stated in Wilson v. Ransom, supra, the cause is remanded to the district court with directions to delete all provisions in the order of November 13, 1987, reciting that the order confirming registration of the Washington support order is a judgment in rem. In all other respects, the order confirming registration is affirmed.
Affirmed as modified, and cause REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.