Case Name: In the Matter of the Application of the Board of Transportation of the City of New York, Acting for and on Behalf of The City of New York, Pursuant to Chapter 4 of the Laws of 1891 and the Several Statutes Amendatory Thereof and Supplemental Thereto Relative to Acquiring for the Construction and Maintenance of a Municipal Rapid Transit Railroad, Certain Real Property and Rights and Easements in, through, under, on and over Certain Real Property, Situate on Prospect Avenue and Other Streets, in the Borough of Brooklyn, City of New York. Pure Oil Company, Appellant; The City of New York, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1934-04
Citations: 241 A.D. 829
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Application of the Board of Transportation of the City of New York, Acting for and on Behalf of The City of New York, Pursuant to Chapter 4 of the Laws of 1891 and the Several Statutes Amendatory Thereof and Supplemental Thereto Relative to Acquiring for the Construction and Maintenance of a Municipal Rapid Transit Railroad, Certain Real Property and Rights and Easements in, through, under, on and over Certain Real Property, Situate on Prospect Avenue and Other Streets, in the Borough of Brooklyn, City of New York. Pure Oil Company, Appellant; The City of New York, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 241
Pages: 829–829

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Application of the Board of Transportation of the City of New York, Acting for and on Behalf of The City of New York, Pursuant to Chapter 4 of the Laws of 1891 and the Several Statutes Amendatory Thereof and Supplemental Thereto Relative to Acquiring for the Construction and Maintenance of a Municipal Rapid Transit Railroad, Certain Real Property and Rights and Easements in, through, under, on and over Certain Real Property, Situate on Prospect Avenue and Other Streets, in the Borough of Brooklyn, City of New York. Pure Oil Company, Appellant; The City of New York, Respondent.

Opinion:
Decree, in so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Davis, JJ.