Case Name: Daniel C. FOWLER, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD, Appellee; Paul S. PARISER, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1984-01-04
Citations: 445 So. 2d 1031
Docket Number: Nos. 83-221, 83-222
Parties: Daniel C. FOWLER, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD, Appellee. Paul S. PARISER, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD, Appellee.
Judges: ANSTEAD, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 445
Pages: 1031–1031

Head Matter:
Daniel C. FOWLER, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD, Appellee. Paul S. PARISER, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD, Appellee.
Nos. 83-221, 83-222.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jan. 4, 1984.
Rehearing Denied March 19, 1984.
Cynthia S. Tunnicliff of Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith & Cutler, Tallahassee, for appellant.
John S. Kalil of Sinoff & Alford, Jacksonville, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm because no reversible error has been made to appear and because the agency action is supported by record competent substantial evidence. Boyette v. State, Professional Practices Council, 346 So.2d 598 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977) and Pauline v. Lee, 147 So.2d 359 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962).
Affirmed.
ANSTEAD, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN, JJ., concur.