Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BRIAN SCOTT TRAUTWEIN, Defendant-Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2009-06-10
Citations: 229 Or. App. 90
Docket Number: CM0520181; A129516
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BRIAN SCOTT TRAUTWEIN, Defendant-Respondent.
Judges: Before Wollheim, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds, Judge, and Sercombe, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 229
Pages: 90–91

Head Matter:
On appellant’s petition for reconsideration filed March 19,
reconsideration allowed; former disposition (217 Or App 429,175 P3d 1028 (2008)) withdrawn; remanded for resentencing June 10, 2009
STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BRIAN SCOTT TRAUTWEIN, Defendant-Respondent.
Benton County Circuit Court
CM0520181; A129516
209 P3d 850
John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Erika L. Hadlock, Acting Solicitor General, and Paul L. Smith, Assistant Attorney-in-Charge, Criminal Appeals, for petition.
Before Wollheim, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds, Judge, and Sercombe, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
The state petitions this court to reconsider its decision in State v. Trautwein, 217 Or App 429, 175 P3d 1028 (2008). In Trautwein, a state's appeal, the state argued that the trial court had erred in ruling that the imposition of consecutive sentences under ORS 137.123(5) would have violated defendant's right to a jury trial under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. We affirmed without opinion. The state now contends that, in light of Oregon v. Ice, 555 US_, 129 S Ct 711, 172 L Ed 2d 517 (2009), our previous decision was incorrect. We agree and, accordingly, withdraw our former decision and remand for resentencing.
Reconsideration allowed; former disposition withdrawn; remanded for resentencing.