Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julio William CAICEDO-ANGULO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-06-07
Citations: 227 F. App'x 874
Docket Number: No. 07-10305
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julio William CAICEDO-ANGULO, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before TJOFLAT, HULL and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 227
Pages: 874–875

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julio William CAICEDO-ANGULO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-10305
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
June 7, 2007.
John Thomas Kingston, Valrico, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
David Paul Rhodes, United States Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for PlaintiffAppellee.
Before TJOFLAT, HULL and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
John T. Kingston, appointed counsel for Julio William Caicedo-Angulo in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Caicedo's conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.