Case Name: James BOLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2017-03-28
Citations: 518 S.W.3d 234
Docket Number: No. ED 104637
Parties: James BOLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 518
Pages: 234–234

Head Matter:
James BOLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 104637
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Filed: March 28, 2017
Rehearing Denied May 16, 2017
James Boley, Mineral Point, MO, Pro Se
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Dora A. Fichter, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent
Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
James Boley, acting pro se, appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We find no error has occurred.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).