Case Name: Susan GADDY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA; Berkshire Life Insurance Company of America; Consolidated Planning, Incorporated, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-01-18
Citations: 407 F. App'x 763
Docket Number: No. 10-1966
Parties: Susan GADDY, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA; Berkshire Life Insurance Company of America; Consolidated Planning, Incorporated, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 407
Pages: 763–763

Head Matter:
Susan GADDY, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA; Berkshire Life Insurance Company of America; Consolidated Planning, Incorporated, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 10-1966.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 13, 2011.
Decided: Jan. 18, 2011.
Susan Gaddy, Appellant Pro Se. Steven E. Farrar, Smith, Moore, Leatherwood, LLP, Greenville, South Carolina; Forrest Stephen Latta, Burr & Forman, LLP, Mobile, Alabama; Gray Thomas Culbreath, Robert F. Goings, Collins & Lacy, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
PER CURIAM:
Susan Gaddy appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment in favor of defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gaddy v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., No. 6:09-cv-00837-HMH, 2010 WL 2926577 (D.S.C. July 23, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.