Case Name: Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Company v. Richey, Administrator
Court: Appellate Court of Indiana
Jurisdiction: Indiana
Decision Date: 1907-06-07
Citations: 41 Ind. App. 610
Docket Number: No. 5,862
Parties: Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Company v. Richey, Administrator.
Judges: Myers, Rabb, Roby and Hadley, JJ., concur; dissenting opinion, Comstock, C. J.
Reporter: Indiana Court of Appeals Reports
Volume: 41
Pages: 610–614

Head Matter:
Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Company v. Richey, Administrator.
[No. 5,862.
Filed June 7, 1907.
Rehearing denied February 7, 1908.
Transfer denied April 28, 1908.]
Appeal. — Assignment of Errors. — •Wrong Court. — Án assignment that there is “manifest error in the record proceedings and judgment of the Superior Court of Marion County in this cause” — setting out same — presents no question, where the record shows that such errors, if any, were committed by the Morgan Circuit Court, to which the venue had been changed when the rulings complained of were made. Comstock, J., dissenting.
Prom Morgan Circuit Court; Joseph W. Williams, Judge.
Action by "William IT. Richey, as administrator of the estate of Perry Lee Richey, deceased, against the' Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Company. Prom a judgment on a verdict for plaintiff for $2,500, defendant appeals.
Affirmed.
F. Winter, W. H. Latia and Oscar Matthews, for appellant.
Charles B. Clarke, Walter C. Clarke, Walter L. Carey, C. G. Benner and J. C. McNutt, for appellee.

Opinion:
Watson, P. J.-
This action was commenced in the Superior Court of Marion County and was by change of venue transferred to the Morgan Circuit Court. In the last-named court a trial was had by jury, resulting in a verdict and judgment in favor of appellee. The jury returned with the general verdict interrogatories and answers thereto. The appellant moved for judgment upon the answers to interrogatories which was overruled and thereupon appellant filed its motion for a new trial, which was also overruled. The examination of the record in the case discloses the fact that neither of said motions was made in or passed upon by the Superior Court of Marion County. The assignment of errors is, in part, as follows: "The Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Company complains and says there was and is manifest error in the record proceedings and judgment of the Superior Court of Marion County in this cause," and then specifically assigns each error. The errors as thus assigned as to said motions do not present any question for consideration. Evansville, etc., R. Co. v. Lavender (1893), 7 Ind. App. 655, 662; State, ex rel., v. Terre Haute, etc., R. Co. (1878), 64 Ind. 297, 303; Indiana, etc., R. Co. v. McBroom (1884), 98 Ind. 167; Smith v. Smith (1886), 106 Ind. 43; Chicago, etc., R. Co. v. Walton (1905), 165 Ind. 642; Elliott, App. Proc., §306. The other errors having been waived by the appellant, there is nothing further to be considered.
It therefore follows that this cause should be, and is, affirmed.
Myers, Rabb, Roby and Hadley, JJ., concur; dissenting opinion, Comstock, C. J.