Case Name: David A. CANADY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2018-09-26
Citations: 255 So. 3d 814
Docket Number: Case No. 2D18-1088
Parties: David A. CANADY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 255
Pages: 814–814

Head Matter:
David A. CANADY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Case No. 2D18-1088
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Opinion filed September 26, 2018

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Carbajal v. State, 75 So. 3d 258 (Fla. 2011) ; State v. King, 426 So. 2d 12 (Fla. 1982) ; McDonald v. State, 133 So. 3d 530 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) ; McKenzie v. State, 31 So. 3d 275 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) ; Hughes v. State, 22 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) ; Shortridge v. State, 884 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) ; Brown v. State, 827 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) ; Desmond v. State, 576 So. 2d 743 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991) ; Budd v. State, 477 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985) ; McMillan v. State, 832 So. 2d 946 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) ; Hart v. State, 761 So. 2d 334 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).
SILBERMAN, BADALAMENTI, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.