Case Name: Paul Vacca et al., Appellants, v. Patrick Valerino et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1990-05-11
Citations: 161 A.D.2d 1143
Docket Number: Appeal No. 2
Parties: Paul Vacca et al., Appellants, v Patrick Valerino et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 161
Pages: 1143–1143

Head Matter:
Paul Vacca et al., Appellants, v Patrick Valerino et al., Respondents.
(Appeal No. 2.)

Opinion:
Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: Although the appeal is from a motion designated as one to "renew", it is properly an appeal from a motion to reargue because plaintiffs submitted no new facts in support of the motion. An order denying a motion to reargue is not appealable (Matter of Jones v Marcy, 135 AD2d 887, 888). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Inglehart, J.—renewal.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, Lawton and Lowery, JJ.