Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Steven M. PILKINGTON, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1997-09-16
Citations: 952 S.W.2d 348
Docket Number: No. 71445
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Steven M. PILKINGTON, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before GRIMM, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 952
Pages: 348–349

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Steven M. PILKINGTON, Defendant/Appellant.
No. 71445.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Sept. 16, 1997.
Emmett D. Queener, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for defendant/appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Daniel G. Cierpiot, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff/respondent.
Before GRIMM, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
A jury convicted defendant of the class C felony of possession of a controlled sub stance, sec. 195.202, RSMo 1994, and the class A misdemeanor of possession of drug paraphernalia, sec. 195.233, RSMo 1994. It assessed his punishment at seven years in the department of corrections and one year in the county jail. The trial court imposed those sentences, running them concurrently.
On appeal, defendant raises two points. Each concerns the trial court's refusal to grant motions to suppress and its admittance of challenged evidence.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. Rule 30.25(b). No error of law appears. The trial court's judgment is affirmed.