Case Name: DADE COUNTY PROPERTIES, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Norman SOLOMON, et al., Appellees; Norman F. SOLOMON, Appellant, v. John HUNT, et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1971-02-09
Citations: 244 So. 2d 558
Docket Number: Nos. 70-587, 70-625
Parties: DADE COUNTY PROPERTIES, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Norman SOLOMON, et al., Appellees. Norman F. SOLOMON, Appellant, v. John HUNT, et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before PEARSON, C. J., and BARK-DULL and HENDRY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 244
Pages: 558–558

Head Matter:
DADE COUNTY PROPERTIES, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Norman SOLOMON, et al., Appellees. Norman F. SOLOMON, Appellant, v. John HUNT, et al., Appellees.
Nos. 70-587, 70-625.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 9, 1971.
Rehearing Denied March 12, 1971.
Norman Solomon, and James F. Pollack, Miami, for appellants.
Richard L. Lapidus, Miami, for appel-lees.
Before PEARSON, C. J., and BARK-DULL and HENDRY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
These appeals are from a judgment of the Circuit Court which set aside a mortgage foreclosure and cancelled the mortgage upon proof of fraud in the procurement of the mortgage and fraud in the foreclosure thereof. The judgment was entered upon a timely petition pursuant to RCP 1.540, 31 F.S.A. In addition to the relief mentioned the trial judge required the appellant, Solomon, to make restitution for some of the damages suffered by the defendants in the original action and by the purchaser at the foreclosure sale.
The finding of fraud is supported by the record and fully supports the relief granted, therefore the judgment is affirmed upon the appeal of Norman F. Solomon.
The appeal of Dade County Properties, Inc., the purchaser at the foreclosure sale, seeks reversal because of uncompensated loss of profit which it sustained. No error has been shown. See Watson v. Jones, 41 Fla. 241, 25 So. 678 (1899); Korabeck v. Childs, 98 Fla. 576, 124 So. 24 (1929).
Affirmed.