Case Name: Clarence Leonte FRAZIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2014-03-14
Citations: 135 So. 3d 444
Docket Number: No. 5D12-253
Parties: Clarence Leonte FRAZIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: TORPY, C.J., PALMER and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 135
Pages: 444–445

Head Matter:
Clarence Leonte FRAZIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D12-253.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
March 14, 2014.
Rehearing Denied April 11, 2014.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Noel A. Pelella, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Clarence L. Frazier, Bushnell, pro se.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm Appellant's judgment and sentence for burglary of a dwelling, but reverse the judgment for grand theft because the evidence was insufficient to establish the value of the items at the time of the theft. Smith v. State, 955 So.2d 1227 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007). We, therefore, remand for entry of a judgment for petit theft pursuant to section 812.014(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2011).
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.
TORPY, C.J., PALMER and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.