Case Name: Mary Jeaninth ANTULICH, Appellant, v. ANCHOR HOCKING CORPORATION, a foreign corporation, et al., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-08-10
Citations: 621 So. 2d 1093
Docket Number: No. 93-103
Parties: Mary Jeaninth ANTULICH, Appellant, v. ANCHOR HOCKING CORPORATION, a foreign corporation, et al., Appellee.
Judges: Before FERGUSON, JORGENSON and LEVY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 621
Pages: 1093–1093

Head Matter:
Mary Jeaninth ANTULICH, Appellant, v. ANCHOR HOCKING CORPORATION, a foreign corporation, et al., Appellee.
No. 93-103.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Aug. 10, 1993.
Ronald C. Pathman, Miami, for appellant.
Nelson and Tacher and Robert Tacher, Miami, for appellee.
Before FERGUSON, JORGENSON and LEVY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In view of the fact that the record reflects the existence of a disputed issue of material fact concerning the design and manufacture of the package in question, the entry of a summary judgment by the trial court in this case was error. Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); Baad v. Security Ins. Co. of Hartford, 606 So.2d 451 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992).
Reversed and remanded.