Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Zachary Eugene HALL, aka Zachary Eugene Muhammad, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-03-17
Citations: 58 F. App'x 732
Docket Number: No. 01-50095; D.C. No. CR-98-00569-WDK
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Zachary Eugene HALL, aka Zachary Eugene Muhammad, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 58
Pages: 732–732

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Zachary Eugene HALL, aka Zachary Eugene Muhammad, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 01-50095.
D.C. No. CR-98-00569-WDK.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 10, 2003.
Decided March 17, 2003.
Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Zachary Eugene Hall appeals from the revocation of probation and imposition of his sentence of 6 months imprisonment followed by 3 years of supervised release. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Hall's counsel has filed a brief stating that he finds no meritorious issues for review, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our examination of the briefs and our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no arguable issues for review on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.