Case Name: DANA COMMERCIAL CREDIT CORPORATION v ESQUIRE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Court: Florida Circuit Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-03-06
Citations: 34 Fla. Supp. 2d 14
Docket Number: Case No. 88-148 AP (County Court Case No. 87-6661CC05)
Parties: DANA COMMERCIAL CREDIT CORPORATION v ESQUIRE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Judges: Before NADLER, DONNER, ROBINSON, JJ.
Reporter: Florida Supplement Second
Volume: 34
Pages: 14–15

Head Matter:
DANA COMMERCIAL CREDIT CORPORATION v ESQUIRE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Case No. 88-148 AP (County Court Case No. 87-6661CC05)
Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Dade County
March 6, 1989
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Nathan A. Schwartz, for appellant.
Robert Rossano, for appellee.
Before NADLER, DONNER, ROBINSON, JJ.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
PER CURIAM.
Within the record provided on appeal, which does not contain a transcript there is nothing to sufficiently indicate that the judgment of the trial court was in error. We assume that evidence was presented supporting the trial judge's finding of unconscionability, and we assume the plaintiff had the opportunity to present evidence as required by Capital Associates Inc. v Hudgens, 455 So.2d 651 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). He found the contract itself unconscionable because it allowed the lessor to obtain possession of the leased equipment but did not require the value of the returned equipment as a credit. The judge, within his discretion and in conformity to the Uniform Commercial Code Sec. 672.302(2), refused to enforce the contract.
We affirm.