Case Name: Thomas R. COX, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of MARYLAND; Anne Arundel County; Kelly Pultz, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-01-24
Citations: 506 F. App'x 244
Docket Number: No. 12-2134
Parties: Thomas R. COX, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of MARYLAND; Anne Arundel County; Kelly Pultz, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 506
Pages: 244–245

Head Matter:
Thomas R. COX, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of MARYLAND; Anne Arundel County; Kelly Pultz, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 12-2134.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 22, 2013.
Decided: Jan. 24, 2013.
Thomas R. Cox, Appellant Pro Se. Hugh Scott Curtis, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland; Philip E. Culpepper, Anne Arundel County Office of Law, Annapolis, Maryland; Morgan William Fisher, Lawrence & Fisher PLLC, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appel-lees.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Thomas R. Cox appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint against the State of Maryland and Anne Arundel County, and his defamation complaint against Kelly Pultz. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cox v. Maryland, No. 1:12-cv-01364-GLR (D.Md. Sept. 10, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.