Case Name: Felton Ernest EPPS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2005-09-14
Citations: 912 So. 2d 644
Docket Number: No. 4D05-1753
Parties: Felton Ernest EPPS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: WARNER, KLEIN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 912
Pages: 644–645

Head Matter:
Felton Ernest EPPS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D05-1753.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Sept. 14, 2005.
Felton Ernest Epps, DeFuniak Springs, pro se.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and David M. Schultz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. A defective notice of intent to habitualize is a procedural error which does not result in an illegal sentence which can be raised in a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion. Moore v. State, 810 So.2d 976 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Hollis v. State, 763 So.2d 1155 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).
WARNER, KLEIN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.