Case Name: Gray v. The State
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1918-11-01
Citations: 22 Ga. App. 797
Docket Number: 10090
Parties: Gray v. The State.
Judges: Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 22
Pages: 797–797

Head Matter:
10090.
Gray v. The State.
Decided November 1, 1918.
Indictment for assault with intent to murder; from Toombs superior court—Judge Hardeman. June 25, 1918.
Williams & Corbitt, for plaintiff in error.
Walter F. Gray, solicitor-general, contra.

Opinion:
Broyles, P. J.
The only point argued in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error is that the court erred in overruling the defendant's motion for a continuance on account, of absent witnesses. The proceedings upon the hearing of the motion are reported in extenso in the record, and it does not affirmatively appear that the trial judge abused his wide discretion in overruling the motion. '
Judgment affirmed.
Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concur.