Case Name: M. E. BARR v. YAMHILL COUNTY
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1928-04-17
Citations: 125 Or. 250
Docket Number: 
Parties: M. E. BARR v. YAMHILL COUNTY.
Judges: 
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 125
Pages: 250–250

Head Matter:
Argued April 11,
affirmed April 17, 1928.
M. E. BARR v. YAMHILL COUNTY.
(266 Pac. 1119.)
For appellant there was a brief over the name of Messrs. Carson, Carson <& Carson, with oral arguments by Mr. Wallace Carson and Mr. Earl A. Nott, District Attorney.
For respondent there was a brief over the name of Messrs. Vinton é Toose and Mr. Eugene E. Marsh, with an oral argument by Mr. Walter L. Toose.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have carefully considered all of the questions raised by the appellant and we find no reversible error. The judgment appealed from is, therefore, affirmed. Affirmed.