Case Name: American Bayard Cycle Co. et al. v. United States; Korlis, Ltd. v. United States; Bert Scheuer, Inc., et al. v. United States; Seedman International Corp. v. United States; Seedman International Corp. v. United States; Seedman International Corp. v. United States
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1968-06-26
Citations: 60 Cust. Ct. 1054
Docket Number: No. P68/291; protests 300213-K, etc. (New York); No. P68/292; protest 58/456 (San Francisco); No. P68/293; protests 59/8756, etc. (Boston and New York); No. P68/294; protests 59/23449 and 59/29250 (Los Angeles); No. P68/295; protests 61/22451-12450 and 61/22892-12814 (Chicago); No. P68/296; protest 62/18408 (San Francisco)
Parties: American Bayard Cycle Co. et al. v. United States, Korlis, Ltd. v. United States, Bert Scheuer, Inc., et al. v. United States, Seedman International Corp. v. United States, Seedman International Corp. v. United States, Seedman International Corp. v. United States,
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Volume: 60
Pages: 1054–1054

Head Matter:
Before the Second Division,
June 26, 1968
No. P68/291.
protests 300213-K, etc. (New York).
No. P68/292.
protest 58/456 (San Francisco).
No. P68/293.
protests 59/8756, etc. (Boston and New York).
No. P68/294.
protests 59/23449 and 59/29250 (Los Angeles).
No. P68/295.
protests 61/22451-12450 and 61/22892-12814 (Chicago).
No. P68/296.
protest 62/18408 (San Francisco).
American Bayard Cycle Co. et al. v. United States, Korlis, Ltd. v. United States, Bert Scheuer, Inc., et al. v. United States, Seedman International Corp. v. United States, Seedman International Corp. v. United States, Seedman International Corp. v. United States,

Opinion:
Beckworth, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of bicycles, with or without tires having wheels in diameter (measured to the outer circumference of the tire) over 25 inches, weighing less than 36 pounds complete without accessories, and not designed for use with tires having a cross-sectional diameter exceeding 1% inches and that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. Schmidt Pritchard & Co., Mangano Cycle Co. (47 CCPA 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.