Case Name: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent, v. Blaine BALDWIN, Petitioner
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2008-09-25
Citations: 957 A.2d 1176
Docket Number: 
Parties: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent, v. Blaine BALDWIN, Petitioner.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 957
Pages: 1176–1177

Head Matter:
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent, v. Blaine BALDWIN, Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Sept. 25, 2008.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 25th day of September 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Should not this Court clarify the doctrine of sentencing merger, and its implications under constitutional double jeopardy analysis, under circumstances where the exact same set of facts satisfies the elements of two different offenses?