Case Name: In the Matter of David H. Dalton, II, Respondent, v. Akron Central Schools, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2013-12-10
Citations: 22 N.Y.3d 1000
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of David H. Dalton, II, Respondent, v Akron Central Schools, Appellant.
Judges: Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam.
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 22
Pages: 1000–1000

Head Matter:
[2 NE3d 928, 979 NYS2d 559]
In the Matter of David H. Dalton, II, Respondent, v Akron Central Schools, Appellant.
Decided December 10, 2013
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Congdon, Flaherty, O’Callaghan, Reid, Donlon, Travis & Fishlinger, Uniondale (Gregory A. Cascino of counsel), for appellant.
Lipsitz, Greene, Scime, Cambria, LLP, Buffalo (John A. Collins of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs. The courts below did not abuse their discretion in granting claimant's application to file and serve a late notice of claim (see Williams v Nassau County Med. Ctr., 6 NY3d 531 [2006]).
Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam.