Case Name: HARMONT PLAZA, INCORPORATED, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1977-02-08
Citations: 549 F.2d 414
Docket Number: No. 75-2455
Parties: HARMONT PLAZA, INCORPORATED, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before PECK, LIVELY and ENGEL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 549
Pages: 414–414

Head Matter:
HARMONT PLAZA, INCORPORATED, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 75-2455.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Feb. 8, 1977.
Rehearing Denied April 7,1977.
Donald DeSalvo, Ronald G. Galip, Youngstown, Ohio, for petitioner-appellant.
Gilbert E. Andrews, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tax Div., U.S. Dept, of Justice, Washington, D.C., Elmer J. Kelsey, Francis J. Gould, Mead Whitaker, Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue, Washington, D.C., for respondentappellee.
Before PECK, LIVELY and ENGEL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
This appeal, perfected from an order entered by the Tax Court affirming certain income tax determinations made by the respondent-appellee, has been submitted on the record on appeal and on the briefs and oral arguments of counsel. Being fully advised in the premises, the Court concludes that the items in dispute were properly assessed against the petitioner-appellant as income returnable by it for the fiscal years ending November 30, 1970, and November 30, 1971, respectively, for the reasons set forth in the opinion filed by Judge William M. Drennen of the Tax Court of the United States, 64 T.C. No. 64, 64 T.C. 632, and therefore,
IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Tax Court be and it hereby is affirmed.