Case Name: Charles A. Bernam et al., Copartners under the Firm Name of Bernam & Tyson, et al., Respondents, v. Harry E. Hecht, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1928-05-11
Citations: 248 N.Y. 565
Docket Number: 
Parties: Charles A. Bernam et al., Copartners under the Firm Name of Bernam & Tyson, et al., Respondents, v. Harry E. Hecht, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 248
Pages: 565–566

Head Matter:
Charles A. Bernam et al., Copartners under the Firm Name of Bernam & Tyson, et al., Respondents, v. Harry E. Hecht, Appellant.
(Argued April 30, 1928;
decided May 11, 1928.)
Joseph Rosenzweig, Joseph H. Robins and David Tepp for appellant.
Clinton T. Taylor and James B. Stilson for respondents.

Opinion:
Order of Appellate Division reversed and that of Special Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division. Questions certified answered in the negative. Held, that the plaintiffs have failed to show any facts justifying or tending to justify the joinder of an additional party.
Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound,- Crane, Andrews, Lehman, Kellogg and O'Brien, JJ.