Case Name: CUTTER v. DOTY
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1833-04
Citations: 1 Wright 200
Docket Number: 
Parties: *CUTTER v. DOTY.
Judges: 
Reporter: Reports of cases at law and in chancery, decided by the Supreme court of Ohio, during the years 1831, 1832, 1833, 1834.
Volume: 1
Pages: 202–202

Head Matter:
*CUTTER v. DOTY.
Replevin — expense of parties — costs.
The expenses of the parties in conducting suits, which are taxed as costs, are-recovered as costs; other expenses cannot he included in the general damages in replevin.
Replevin. The only question presented to the court was-whether it is competent in assessing damages for the detention of goods replevied, to include the expenses of prosecuting the suit for the recovery.

Opinion:
BY THE COURT.
The expenses of the suit which constitute taxable costs, are recovered as costs; they cannot be included in the general damages. Other expenses cannot be taken into consideration in an action of replevin.
[This is after the decision in Cutter v. Doty, 5 O. 393.]