Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LaCarlos Quanique DAVID, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-01-05
Citations: 1 F. App'x 124
Docket Number: No. 00-7489
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LaCarlos Quanique DAVID, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 1
Pages: 124–124

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LaCarlos Quanique DAVID, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 00-7489.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 15, 2000.
Decided Jan. 5, 2001.
LaCarlos Quanique David, pro se. Janet S. Reinke, Office of the United States Attorney, Norfolk, VA, for appellee.
Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
LaCarlos Quanique David seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. David, Nos. CR-95-9; CA-00-97-4 (E.D.Va. Oct. 5, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.