Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Etoyi Monray BLOUNT, a/k/a E, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-11-27
Citations: 489 F. App'x 746
Docket Number: No. 12-7185
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Etoyi Monray BLOUNT, a/k/a E, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 489
Pages: 746–746

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Etoyi Monray BLOUNT, a/k/a E, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-7185.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 20, 2012.
Decided: Nov. 27, 2012.
Etoyi Monray Blount, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Etoyi Monray Blount appeals the district court's order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See United States v. Blount, No. 5:05-cr-00009-RLV-DCK-31 (W.D.N.C. July 3, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Although the district court granted Blount's § 3582 motion, the reduction granted by the court did not reduce Blount's sentence to the full extent he requested.