Case Name: Tshiswaka B. KAYEMBE, Appellant, v. Marianne M.B. KAYEMBE, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-02-11
Citations: 100 S.W.3d 839
Docket Number: No. ED 80422
Parties: Tshiswaka B. KAYEMBE, Appellant, v. Marianne M.B. KAYEMBE, Respondent.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER, III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 100
Pages: 839–840

Head Matter:
Tshiswaka B. KAYEMBE, Appellant, v. Marianne M.B. KAYEMBE, Respondent.
No. ED 80422.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Feb. 11, 2003.
Application for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 20, 2003.
Application for Transfer Denied April 22, 2003.
Dorian B. Amon, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Alan E. Freed, Alisse C. Camazine, Clayton, MO, for Respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER, III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Tshiswaka B. Kayembe (hereinafter, "Husband") appeals the trial court's judgment dissolving his eighteen year marriage to Marianne M.B. Kayembe (hereinafter, 'Wife"). Husband claims that the trial court erred in its valuation of his medical practice, awarding Wife $5,000.00 monthly maintenance, imputing his income, and its unequal division of marital property due to his marital misconduct.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The judgment is supported by substantial and competent evidence in the record and is not against the weight of the evidence. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).