Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Cecil CLINTON, III, also known as Clifton Dwight Washington, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-08-18
Citations: 331 F. App'x 297
Docket Number: No. 08-11007
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Cecil CLINTON, III, also known as Clifton Dwight Washington, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 331
Pages: 297–297

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Cecil CLINTON, III, also known as Clifton Dwight Washington, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-11007.
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 18, 2009.
Cody Lee Skipper, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Lubbock, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Helen Miller Liggett, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Lubbock, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Cecil Clinton, III, presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Brown, 920 F.2d 1212, 1216-17 (5th Cir.1991), abrogated on other grounds by United States v. Candia, 454 F.3d 468, 472-73 (5th Cir.2006), which held that a district court may order a term of imprisonment to run consecutively with an unimposed state sentence. The Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.