Case Name: Daniel Singer, Appellant, v. Casey Krul, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2012-03-29
Citations: 18 N.Y.3d 953
Docket Number: 
Parties: Daniel Singer, Appellant, v Casey Krul, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 18
Pages: 953–953

Head Matter:
Daniel Singer, Appellant, v Casey Krul, Respondent.
Submitted February 6, 2012;
decided March 29, 2012
Reported below, 90 AD3d 1378.

Opinion:
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution (see Cuadrado v New York City Tr. Auth., 65 AD3d 434 [2009], Iv dismissed 14 NY3d 748 [2010]).