Case Name: Richard D. Lauer v. Planning Commission of the Town of Redding et al.
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1994-02-15
Citations: 33 Conn. App. 938
Docket Number: 11682
Parties: Richard D. Lauer v. Planning Commission of the Town of Redding et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Appellate Reports
Volume: 33
Pages: 938–939

Head Matter:
Richard D. Lauer v. Planning Commission of the Town of Redding et al.
(11682)
O’Connell, Lavery and Spear, Js.
Argued January 4
decision released February 15, 1994
Nancy Burton, for the appellant (plaintiff).
Michael N. LaVelle, for the appellee (named defendant).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We have carefully examined the record, transcripts and briefs submitted to us in this appeal. After affording the appellant's claims that are properly before us the appropriate scope of review, we find them to be without merit.
The judgment is affirmed.