Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jamel Burgess, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2011-10-06
Citations: 88 A.D.3d 469
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jamel Burgess, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 88
Pages: 469–469

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jamel Burgess, Appellant.
[930 NYS2d 442]

Opinion:
The resentencing proceeding imposing a term of postrelease supervision was neither barred by double jeopardy nor otherwise unlawful (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]). Defendant may not challenge the voluntariness of his underlying guilty plea on this appeal (see People v Jordan, 16 NY3d 845 [2011]). Concur — Tom, J.E, Saxe, DeGrasse, Freedman and Román, JJ.