Case Name: Boston Dry Goods Company et al. v. Rosa Jarmoulowsky Company
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1930-04-15
Citations: 41 Ga. App. 314
Docket Number: 20284
Parties: Boston Dry Goods Company et al. v. Rosa Jarmoulowsky Company.
Judges: Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 41
Pages: 314–314

Head Matter:
20284.
Boston Dry Goods Company et al. v. Rosa Jarmoulowsky Company.
Decided April 15, 1930.
Isaac M. Wengrow, Henry II. Tisinger, for plaintiff in error.
Samuel J. Boykin, contra.

Opinion:
Broyles, C. J.
1. The amendment to the motion for a new trial is not argued or referred to in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, and, therefore, is treated as abandoned.
2. This case was tried by the judge without the intervention of a jury. The evidence, while conflicting, authorized the judgment rendered, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.
Judgment affirmed.
Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.