Case Name: AMERICAN OPTICAL COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SHUR-ON OPTICAL COMPANY, Inc., et al., Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1926-12-13
Citations: 16 F.2d 1013
Docket Number: No. 187
Parties: AMERICAN OPTICAL COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SHUR-ON OPTICAL COMPANY, Inc., et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 16
Pages: 1013–1013

Head Matter:
AMERICAN OPTICAL COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SHUR-ON OPTICAL COMPANY, Inc., et al., Defendants-Appellants.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
December 13, 1926.)
No. 187.
Charles Neave, of New York City, Harrison F. Lyman, of Boston, Mass., and H. H. Styll, of Southbridge, Mass., for American-Optical Co.
Davis & Simms, of Rochester, N. Y. (C. Schuyler Davis, of Rochester, N. Y., and Drury W. Cooper, of New York City, of counsel), for Shur-on Optical Co. and others.
Before MANTON and MACK, Circuit Judges, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, District Judge:

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed 'on opinion of Hazel, District Judge, 9 F.(2d) 932.