Case Name: Stanley ORR et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. S. M. N. MARRS et al., Defendants in Error
Court: Supreme Court of Texas
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1932-07-06
Citations: 52 S.W.2d 53
Docket Number: No. 18892
Parties: Stanley ORR et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. S. M. N. MARRS et al., Defendants in Error.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 52
Pages: 53–53

Head Matter:
Stanley ORR et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. S. M. N. MARRS et al., Defendants in Error.
No. 18892.
Supreme Court of Texas.
July 6, 1932.
Woolworth & Baker, of Carthage, for plaintiffs in error.
Brachfield & Wolfe, of Henderson, for defendants in error.

Opinion:
PEE CURIAM.
The question as to whether or not the bonds Involved in this suit could have been abrogated or canceled by authority of an election and vote of the people, held for that purpose, is not before us, and we express no opinion upon that question. We have therefore dismissed the application for writ of error under the statute for want of jurisdiction.