Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Juan Carlos Calderon, Also Known as Ofidio Bonilla, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2001-12-24
Citations: 289 A.D.2d 502
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Juan Carlos Calderon, Also Known as Ofidio Bonilla, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 289
Pages: 502–502

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Juan Carlos Calderon, Also Known as Ofidio Bonilla, Appellant.
[735 NYS2d 418]

Opinion:
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Kowtna, J.), rendered July 2, 1998, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
The defendant's remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Ritter, J. P., Friedmann, Feuerstein and Crane, JJ., concur.