Case Name: Eva REHNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Baxter RICE, Individually and as Director of the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the State of California, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1983-10-03
Citations: 717 F.2d 492
Docket Number: No. 77-2409
Parties: Eva REHNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Baxter RICE, Individually and as Director of the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the State of California, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before BROWNING, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, KENNEDY, TANG, FARRIS, PREGERSON, POOLE, CANBY, REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 717
Pages: 492–492

Head Matter:
Eva REHNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Baxter RICE, Individually and as Director of the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the State of California, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 77-2409.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Feb. 10, 1983.
Decided Oct. 3, 1983.
Stephan V. Quesenberry, Seattle, Wash., Art Bunce, Escondido, Cal., Indian Legal Services, for Rehner.
William R. Winship, Jr., Alan S. Meth, San Diego, Cal., argued, for Rice; Evelle J. Younger, Atty. Gen., Sacramento, Cal., on brief.
Before BROWNING, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, KENNEDY, TANG, FARRIS, PREGERSON, POOLE, CANBY, REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
In accordance with the Supreme Court's decision in Rice v. Rehner, — U.S. —, 103 S.Ct. 3291, 77 L.Ed.2d 961 (1983), reversing and remanding 678 F.2d 1340 (9th Cir.1982), the judgment of the district court dismissing the complaint is AFFIRMED.