Case Name: HENRY GRANSBURY v. STATE
Court: Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1922-12-09
Citations: 22 Okla. Crim. 239
Docket Number: No. A-3851
Parties: HENRY GRANSBURY v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: Oklahoma Criminal Reports
Volume: 22
Pages: 239–240

Head Matter:
HENRY GRANSBURY v. STATE.
No. A-3851.
Opinion Filed Dec. 9, 1922.
(210 Pac. 733.)
Titus & Talbot, for plaintiff in error.
The Attorney General, W. C. Hall, Asst. Atty. Gen., and W. L. Owen, Co. Atty., for-the State.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff in error, Henry Gransbury, was convicted in the county court of Alfalfa county on a charge of having unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, and punishment fixed at confinement in thé county jail for 60 days and a fine of $500. Judgment was rendered on the 11th day of May, 1920. From this judgment the defendant attempted to perfect an appeal by filing in this court, on September 10, 1920, a petition in error with case-made attached. The Attorney General and county attorney have filed a motion to rHsmiKs the appeal herein because the same was not filed within the time allowed by law and orders of the court.
It appearing on the face of the record that this appeal was not filed until the hundred and twenty-second day after the rendition of judgment, this being an attempted appeal from .a judgment of conviction for a misdemeanor, the motion to •dismiss the appeal will be sustained, and the cause remanded to the county court of Alfalfa county, with directions to enforce the judgment and sentence. Griffin v. State, 14 Okla. Cr. 300, 170 Pac. 518.