Case Name: KENNEDY AND ELY INSURANCE, INC., Appellant, v. Richard G. HERSHEY, as Director of the Department of Insurance of the State of Illinois, and Liquidator of Central Casualty Company, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1968-11-26
Citations: 405 F.2d 888
Docket Number: No. 25705
Parties: KENNEDY AND ELY INSURANCE, INC., Appellant, v. Richard G. HERSHEY, as Director of the Department of Insurance of the State of Illinois, and Liquidator of Central Casualty Company, Appellee.
Judges: Before COLEMAN and MORGAN, Circuit Judges, and HUNTER, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 405
Pages: 888–888

Head Matter:
KENNEDY AND ELY INSURANCE, INC., Appellant, v. Richard G. HERSHEY, as Director of the Department of Insurance of the State of Illinois, and Liquidator of Central Casualty Company, Appellee.
No. 25705.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
Nov. 26, 1968.
Rehearing Denied Dec. 17, 1968.
Herbert A. Warren, Jr., Hilton R. Carr, Jr., Carr & Warren, Miami, Fla., for appellant.
James A. Dixon, Dennis G. King, Dixon, DeJarnette, Bradford, Williams, McKay & Kimbrell, Miami, Fla., for appellee.
Before COLEMAN and MORGAN, Circuit Judges, and HUNTER, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appellee as Illinois Liquidator of Central Casualty Company, after trial to "the court without a jury, recovered judgment against appellant, as a former agent of that company, in the sum of $9,265.80. We affirm.
The outcome of the litigation turned on such legal issues as the application of the Florida law on "mass cancellations" of insurance policies, whether the debtor-creditor relationship existed as to policy premiums on which the agency had extended credit, whether the trustee relationship existed as to premiums collected, and whether the company, as of March 1, 1962, was entitled to credit for premiums remitted as collected, although collection, in fact, had not occurred.
Upon a critical survey of the record we find no room for holding that any of the factual determinations of the court below were clearly erroneous. The record is equally clear of legal error. An affirmance necessarily follows.
Affirmed.