Case Name: FRED J. KUSKE v. FRANZ JEVNE AND ANOTHER
Court: Minnesota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Minnesota
Decision Date: 1928-02-17
Citations: 173 Minn. 584
Docket Number: No. 26,592
Parties: FRED J. KUSKE v. FRANZ JEVNE AND ANOTHER.
Judges: 
Reporter: Minnesota Reports
Volume: 173
Pages: 584–585

Head Matter:
FRED J. KUSKE v. FRANZ JEVNE AND ANOTHER.
February 17, 1928.
No. 26,592.
Manahan, Hoogesteger & Mcmahcm, for appellant.
W. V. Kane and L. P. Blomholm, for respondents.
Reported in 218 N. W. 99.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Plaintiff appeals from an order vacating a writ of attachment and the levy- thereunder.
On the showing made before the trial court there was dispute as to some of the facts, and the facts that were undisputed were such that different inferences and conclusions could reasonably be drawn therefrom. In that situation the rule announced in First State Bank v. Schatz, 104 Minn. 425, 116 N. W. 917, applies.
Affirmed.