Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Dennis CASTANEDA, also known as Gato, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-02-24
Citations: 678 F. App'x 203
Docket Number: No. 16-50411 Summary Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Dennis CASTANEDA, also known as Gato, Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before OWEN, ELROD, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 678
Pages: 203–204

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Dennis CASTANEDA, also known as Gato, Defendant-Appellant
No. 16-50411 Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed February 24, 2017
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Dennis Castaneda, Pro Se
Before OWEN, ELROD, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Dennis Castaneda, former federal prisoner # 66402-079, moves this court for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) following the district court's denial of his motion to terminate restitution under 18 U.S.C. § 3613(b). We construe Castaneda's motion as a challenge to the district court's determination that his appeal is not taken in good faith. See Robinson v. United States, 812 F.3d 476, 476 (5th Cir. 2016) (citing Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997)). Our inquiry is "limited to whether the appeal involves legal points arguable on their merits (and therefore not frivolous)." Robinson, 812 F.3d at 476 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).
As noted by the district court "liability to pay restitution shall terminate on the date that is the later of 20 years from the entry of judgment or 20 years after the release from imprisonment of the person ordered to pay restitution." § 3613(b) (emphasis'added). Castaneda's argument that his liability to pay restitution terminated 20 years from the entry of judgment is thus patently without merit. See § 3613(b). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Castaneda's motion to proceed IFP on appeal is DENIED, and that the appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202 n.24; see also 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.