Case Name: Muhammad Abd Saleem EURY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mr. KEELIN, Assistant Warden; Mr. Gibbs; Lieutenant Ross; Sergeant Bernardo; Sergeant Shafer, Defendants-Appellees, and John Taylor, Warden; Mr. Morehead, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-03-01
Citations: 5 F. App'x 159
Docket Number: No. 00-7710
Parties: Muhammad Abd Saleem EURY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mr. KEELIN, Assistant Warden; Mr. Gibbs; Lieutenant Ross; Sergeant Bernardo; Sergeant Shafer, Defendants-Appellees, and John Taylor, Warden; Mr. Morehead, Defendants.
Judges: Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 5
Pages: 159–160

Head Matter:
Muhammad Abd Saleem EURY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mr. KEELIN, Assistant Warden; Mr. Gibbs; Lieutenant Ross; Sergeant Bernardo; Sergeant Shafer, Defendants-Appellees, and John Taylor, Warden; Mr. Morehead, Defendants.
No. 00-7710.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 22, 2001.
Decided March 1, 2001.
Muhammad Abd Saleem Eury, pro se.
Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Muhammad Abd Saleem Eury appeals the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Eury v. Keelin, No. CA-00-415-2 (E.D.Va. Nov. 21, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.