Case Name: Tyrone HURT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OF the State of MARYLAND; All Department of Corrections of the Forty Nine States of the USA, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-06-28
Citations: 531 F. App'x 347
Docket Number: No. 13-1254
Parties: Tyrone HURT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OF the State of MARYLAND; All Department of Corrections of the Forty Nine States of the USA, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 531
Pages: 347–347

Head Matter:
Tyrone HURT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OF the State of MARYLAND; All Department of Corrections of the Forty Nine States of the USA, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 13-1254.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 17, 2013.
Decided: June 28, 2013.
Tyrone Hurt, Appellant Pro se.
Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Tyrone Hurt appeals the district court's order denying his petition for a writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hurt v. Dep't of Corr., No. 8:09-cv-01248-RWT (D.Md. Feb. 1, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.