Case Name: Andrew CRAWFORD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 2007-05-09
Citations: 226 S.W.3d 688
Docket Number: No. 10-06-00269-CR
Parties: Andrew CRAWFORD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
Judges: Before Chief Justice GRAY, Justice VANCE, and Justice REYNA.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 226
Pages: 688–692

Head Matter:
Andrew CRAWFORD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
No. 10-06-00269-CR.
Court of Appeals of Texas, Waco.
May 9, 2007.
Andrew Crawford, New Boston, pro se.
John W. Segrest, McLennan County Dist. Atty., Waco, for The State of Texas.
Before Chief Justice GRAY, Justice VANCE, and Justice REYNA.
(Because Crawford filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss his appeal, I fully join this opinion. I further note that we may soon decide whether a petition for writ of mandamus is an appropriate vehicle to challenge the validity of an order issued without notice or hearing that results in money being withdrawn from an inmate’s trust account by the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Corrections.)

Opinion:
OPINION
PER CURIAM.
Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this pro se appeal. See Tex.R.Apf. P. 42.2(a); McClain v. State, 17 S.W.3d 310, 311 (Tex.App.-Waco 2000, no pet.) (per curiam). We have not issued a decision in this appeal. The Clerk of this Court has sent a duplicate copy to the trial court clerk. Id. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
Chief Justice GRAY dissenting.
Justice VANCE concurs in the judgment with a note.
. The Clerk also sent a duplicate copy to the prosecuting attorney.