Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Leslie ANDERSON, Defendant/Appellant; Leslie ANDERSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1993-03-09
Citations: 848 S.W.2d 629
Docket Number: Nos. 59616 and 61807
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Leslie ANDERSON, Defendant/Appellant. Leslie ANDERSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANDALL, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GRIMM, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 848
Pages: 629–630

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Leslie ANDERSON, Defendant/Appellant. Leslie ANDERSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 59616 and 61807.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
March 9, 1993.
Emily N. Blood, St. Louis, for appellant.
William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Rudolph R. Rhodes, IV, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before CRANDALL, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GRIMM, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
A jury convicted defendant of four counts of first degree robbery in violation of § 569.020, RSMo 1986, and one count of attempted first degree robbery in violation of § 564.011, RSMo 1986. He was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to life imprisonment on each of the robbery counts and 15-years imprisonment on the attempted robbery count. The sentences are to be served concurrently. In addition to his direct appeal, he appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an eviden-tiary hearing.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgments are affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).