Case Name: Jimmy C. HERFORD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1969-12-10
Citations: 447 S.W.2d 924
Docket Number: No. 42625
Parties: Jimmy C. HERFORD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 447
Pages: 924–925

Head Matter:
Jimmy C. HERFORD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
No. 42625.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Dec. 10, 1969.
No Attorney on Appeal.
Jim Vollers, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
OPINION
ONION, Judge.
The offense is violation of the liquor law; the punishment, a $100 fine.
We are confronted with the same problem that we were confronted with in Bedell v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 443 S.W.2d 850 and cases there cited. See also Stuart v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 445 S.W.2d 743.
It appears from the record that the sentence was untimely and improperly pronounced. See Article 42.03, Vernon's Ann. C.C.P. If, however, sentence was properly pronounced, then notice of appeal was not given within ten days thereafter as required by Article 44.08, Vernon's Ann. C.C.P.
It is clear that for either reason the appeal must be dismissed.
It is so ordered.