Case Name: GULF COAST CHEMICAL CO. v. HOPKINS
Court: Texas Courts of Civil Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1940-10-19
Citations: 145 S.W.2d 928
Docket Number: No. 12914
Parties: GULF COAST CHEMICAL CO. v. HOPKINS.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 145
Pages: 928–929

Head Matter:
GULF COAST CHEMICAL CO. v. HOPKINS.
No. 12914.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Dallas.
Oct. 19, 1940.
Rehearing Denied Dec. 7, 1940.
Chrestman, Brundidge, Fountain, Elliott & Bateman and J. A. Blakeley, all of Dallas, for appellants.
.J. Frank Wilson and J. Lee Zumwalt, both of Dallas, for appellee.

Opinion:
YOUNG, Justice.
The suit in the lower court was by appellant against Hopkins, a garage keeper, for loss of an automobile placed for storage on a fee basis, but not redelivered on demand. Fireman's Fund Underwriters intervened, claiming an interest in the action, as assignee under a policy insuring the particular car against theft. Upon a trial to the court, judgment was rendered for the garage owner, from which the losing parties have appealed. It appears to be undisputed that said vehicle was stolen shortly after being stored, and the only issue before the .court was, whether Hopkins, as bailee, exercised ordinary care under the circumstances of the car's disappearance. Munger Automobile Co. v. American Lloyds of Dallas, Tex.Civ.App., 267 S.W. 304; Exporters' & Traders' Compress & Warehouse Co. v. Schulze, Tex.Com.App., 265 S.W. 133; Langford v. Nevin, 117 Tex. 130, 298 S.W. 536. Appellee testified by deposition and in person, and, therefrom, the court determined' he was not at fault, which conclusion, we believe, has support in the rec ord. In a non-jury trial, every reasonable inference of fact, supported by the statement of facts, will be drawn in favor of the court's rendition. 3 T.J., Appeal and Error—Civil, Sec. 747, p. 1060; Houston Oil Co. v. Biskamp, Tex.Civ.App., 99 S.W.2d 1007. Such judgment must therefore be affirmed.
Affirmed.