Case Name: In the Matter of S. M., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. S. M., Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2012-11-21
Citations: 253 Or. App. 598
Docket Number: C110052MC; A148504
Parties: In the Matter of S. M., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. S. M., Appellant.
Judges: Before Schuman, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Nakamoto, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 253
Pages: 598–599

Head Matter:
Submitted October 8,
reversed November 21, 2012
In the Matter of S. M., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. S. M., Appellant.
Washington County Circuit Court
C110052MC; A148504
291 P3d 798
Susan D. Isaacs filed the brief for appellant.
Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General, and Laura S. Anderson, Senior Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Schuman, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Nakamoto, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that she is unable to provide for her basic needs because of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state's concession, and reverse.
Reversed.