Case Name: Maurice J. Salem, Plaintiff, v. Michael Neshewat, Defendant. (Action No. 1.); Michael Neshewat, Respondent, v. Maurice J. Neshewat, Also Known as Maurice J. Salem, Appellant. (Action No. 2.)
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2000-06-20
Citations: 95 N.Y.2d 822
Docket Number: 
Parties: Maurice J. Salem, Plaintiff, v Michael Neshewat, Defendant. (Action No. 1.) Michael Neshewat, Respondent, v Maurice J. Neshewat, Also Known as Maurice J. Salem, Appellant. (Action No. 2.)
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 95
Pages: 822–823

Head Matter:
Maurice J. Salem, Plaintiff, v Michael Neshewat, Defendant. (Action No. 1.) Michael Neshewat, Respondent, v Maurice J. Neshewat, Also Known as Maurice J. Salem, Appellant. (Action No. 2.)
Submitted May 30, 2000;
decided June 20, 2000

Opinion:
Appeal, insofar as taken from that part of the Appellate Division order that dismissed the appeal from an order denying appellant's motion for recusal and from an order denying appellant's motion to vacate a determination entered on default, dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that such portion of the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; appeal otherwise dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.