Case Name: In re: Steven James HALL, a/k/a Contourimpco, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-09-24
Citations: 539 F. App'x 276
Docket Number: No. 13-1773
Parties: In re: Steven James HALL, a/k/a Contourimpco, Petitioner.
Judges: Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 539
Pages: 276–276

Head Matter:
In re: Steven James HALL, a/k/a Contourimpco, Petitioner.
No. 13-1773.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 19, 2013.
Decided: Sept. 24, 2013.
Steven James Hall, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Steven J. Hall petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2013) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court's docket reveals that the district court recently denied the motion. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.