Case Name: Arts4All, Ltd., Appellant-Respondent, et al., Plaintiff, v. Judith L. Hancock, Respondent-Appellant and Third-Party Respondent. Daniel Y.C. Ng et al., Third-Party Defendants
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2009-01-15
Citations: 11 N.Y.3d 908
Docket Number: 
Parties: Arts4All, Ltd., Appellant-Respondent, et al., Plaintiff, v Judith L. Hancock, Respondent-Appellant and Third-Party Respondent. Daniel Y.C. Ng et al., Third-Party Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 11
Pages: 908–908

Head Matter:
Arts4All, Ltd., Appellant-Respondent, et al., Plaintiff, v Judith L. Hancock, Respondent-Appellant and Third-Party Respondent. Daniel Y.C. Ng et al., Third-Party Defendants.
Submitted October 20, 2008;
decided January 15, 2009

Opinion:
Motion by Arts4All, Ltd. to dismiss the appeal taken as of right by Hancock granted and the appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the two-Justice dissent is not on a question of law and no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. On the Court's own motion, appeal taken as of right by Arts4All dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the two-Justice dissent is not on a question of law.