Case Name: Syracuse Solar Salt Company, Respondent, v. Rome, Watertown and Ogdensburg Railroad Company, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1901-10-22
Citations: 168 N.Y. 650
Docket Number: 
Parties: Syracuse Solar Salt Company, Respondent, v. Rome, Watertown and Ogdensburg Railroad Company, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 168
Pages: 650–650

Head Matter:
Syracuse Solar Salt Company, Respondent, v. Rome, Watertown and Ogdensburg Railroad Company, Appellant.
. Syracuse Solar Salt Go. v. J}., W. & O. B. B. Go., 43 App. Div. 303, affirmed.
(Argued October 8, 1901;
decided October 22, 1901.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered November 8, 1899, modifying, and affirming as modified, a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Willicum B. Hornblower and William G. Tracy for appellant.
C. A. Andrews for respondent.

Opinion:
J udgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J"., Gray, Bartlett, Cullen and Werner, JJ. Taking no part: Martin, J. Not sitting: Vann, J.