Case Name: Albert Mateyka, Respondent, v. Henry M. Reischmann and Celia Paulissen, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1942-05-08
Citations: 264 A.D. 752
Docket Number: 
Parties: Albert Mateyka, Respondent, v. Henry M. Reischmann and Celia Paulissen, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 264
Pages: 752–752

Head Matter:
(May 8, 1942.)
Albert Mateyka, Respondent, v. Henry M. Reischmann and Celia Paulissen, Appellants.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We interpret the interlocutory judgment to mean that on tli accounting plaintiff is entitled to one-third of the assets of the partnership afta crediting each partner with the amount of such partner's capital contribution! As so interpreted, we think the judgment is correct.
The judgment should be affirmed, without costs.
Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs.