Case Name: M. Rodney JONES, a/k/a Rodney M. Jones, a/k/a Rodney E. Jones, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-05-01
Citations: 62 F. App'x 536
Docket Number: No. 02-7709
Parties: M. Rodney JONES, a/k/a Rodney M. Jones, a/k/a Rodney E. Jones, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 62
Pages: 536–536

Head Matter:
M. Rodney JONES, a/k/a Rodney M. Jones, a/k/a Rodney E. Jones, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 02-7709.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 24, 2003.
Decided May 1, 2003.
M. Rodney Jones, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
M. Rodney Jones seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion to alter or amend the judgment. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.
Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court's final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corr., 434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (1960)).
The district court's order was entered on the docket on August 21, 2002. The notice of appeal was filed no earlier than October 31, 2002. Because Jones failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We also deny Jones' motions for appointment of counsel and for protection from inmates and staff at the South Carolina Department of Corrections. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Jones' notice of appeal was received by the district court on November 5, 2002. However, we must consider it filed as of the date it was delivered to prison officials for mailing. See Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988). Giving Jones every benefit of the doubt, his notice is deemed filed on October 31, 2002.