Case Name: F. D. PIERCE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1954-12-08
Citations: 274 S.W.2d 408
Docket Number: No. 27236
Parties: F. D. PIERCE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 274
Pages: 408–410

Head Matter:
F. D. PIERCE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
No. 27236.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Dec. 8, 1954.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 12, 1955.
No attorney on appeal for appellant.
Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
BELCHER, Commissioner.
This is a conviction for the sale of whiskey in a dry area; the punishment, a fine of .$625.
It was stipulated that Hall County was a dry area.
The state's testimony shows that R. M. Barba and Lynn C. Burke, Inspectors for the Texas Liquor Control Board, contacted appellant in a cafe and told him they wanted to buy some whiskey, and that appellant replied that he had it for sale. The inspectors went with appellant in his automobile to a field where appellant obtained two pints of whiskey, and he delivered one pint of the whiskey to Inspector Barba who gave appellant $5 in payment therefor.
Inspector Barba testified that he broke the seal on the bottle at the time it was delivered to him by appellant; that he tasted its contents and it was whiskey.
Appellant did not testify and offered no testimony.
Appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the state's pleadings alleging a sale of an alcoholic beverage containing alcohol in execss of four per cent by weight, to-wit, whiskey, because it was not shown that the alcoholic content of such beverage was in excess of four per cent by weight.
We had before us a similar contention in Skinner v. State, 144 Tex.Cr.R. 21, 159 S.W.2d 878, 879, where we said: "While Section 3a of Article 666, Vernon's Ann. P.C., defines an 'alcoholic beverage' as 'any beverage containing more than one-half of one per cent of alcohol by volume', etc., the article also defines 'liquor' as 'any alcoholic beverage containing alcohol in excess of four (4) per centum by weight, unless otherwise indicated.' 'Proof that an alcoholic beverage is alcohol, spirits of wine, whiskey shall be prima facie evidence that the same is liquor as herein defined.' Liquor is therein defined as any alcoholic beverage containing alcohol in excess of four per cent by weight. However, since we judicially know that whiskey is an alcoholic beverage, and since proof of an alcoholic beverage shall be prima facie evidence that the same is liquor as therein defined, it necessarily follows that it con tained alcohol in excess of four per cent by volume."
Appellant complains, in his amended motion for a new trial, of alleged jury misconduct; but said motion is not verified or supported by affidavit, therefore it is insufficient as a pleading and cannot be considered. 31 Tex.Jur. 298, Sec. 95; Yarborough v. State, 130 Tex.Cr.R. 315, 94 S.W.2d 179; Carruthers v. State, 143 Tex.Cr.R. 45, 156 S.W.2d 988; Boone v. State, 156 Tex.Cr.R. 327, 242 S.W.2d 380.
Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Opinion approved by the Court.