Case Name: James BUTLER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-01-17
Citations: 356 S.W.3d 881
Docket Number: No. ED 96365
Parties: James BUTLER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 356
Pages: 881–881

Head Matter:
James BUTLER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 96365.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Jan. 17, 2012.
Timothy J. Forneris, St. Louis, MO, for Movant/Appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jessica P. Meredith, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent/Respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
James Butler appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 24.035 , following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2010, unless otherwise indicated.