Case Name: MORRIS S. BLOODGOOD, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. WILLIAM GOOD GREGORY, Executor, &c., Defendant and Appellant
Court: New York Superior Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1874-10-31
Citations: 6 Jones & S. 132
Docket Number: 
Parties: MORRIS S. BLOODGOOD, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. WILLIAM GOOD GREGORY, Executor, &c., Defendant and Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Reports of cases argued and determined in the Superior Court of the city of New York
Volume: 38
Pages: 132–132

Head Matter:
MORRIS S. BLOODGOOD, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. WILLIAM GOOD GREGORY, Executor, &c., Defendant and Appellant.
Before Freedman, Van Yorst and Speir, JJ.
Decided October 31, 1874.
Appeal from, judgment.
This action was based upon one of the notes mentioned in the foregoing reported case (Cary ®. Gregory), andas the points of law and rulings are the same as in that case, it was stipulated between the parties that the decision of this case should follow that of Cary v. Gregory.
James Flynn, for appellant.
J. E. Cary, attorney in person, for respondent.

Opinion:
By the Court.—Freedman, J.
For the reasons assigned in Cary v. Gregory, the judgment must be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant, to abide the event. r
Yan Yorst and Speir, JJ., concurred.