Case Name: THE F. MANSFIELD & SONS CO., INC. vs. RAYMOND PAUSCH ET UX.
Court: Connecticut Superior Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1940-07-16
Citations: 8 Conn. Supp. 402
Docket Number: File No. 59073
Parties: THE F. MANSFIELD & SONS CO., INC. vs. RAYMOND PAUSCH ET UX.
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Supplement
Volume: 8
Pages: 402–402

Head Matter:
THE F. MANSFIELD & SONS CO., INC. vs. RAYMOND PAUSCH ET UX.
Superior Court New Haven County
File No. 59073
MEMORANDUM FILED JULY 16, 1940.
Watrous, Hewitt, Gumbart & Corbin, of New Haven, for the Plaintiff.
Slade, Slade & Slade, of New Haven, for the Defendants.

Opinion:
QUINLAN, J.
The demurrer to a lone paragraph, viz;., paragraph 6, which does not of itself attempt to state a cause of action, is improperly pleaded. Practice Book (1934) §97.
So far as the demurrer to the prayer for relief is concerned, the more specific statement in conjunction with paragraph 6 adequately states a cause upon which such relief could be predicated. See, however, form 249 in connection with form 250, Practice Book (1934) pp. 215, 216.
In its present form, as to subdivision I of the demurrer, and at the present time, in view of such allegations as do ap' pear as to subdivision II, the demurrer is. overruled.