Case Name: Kristin ROSSUM, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Deborah L. PATRICK, Warden; Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General for the State of California, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-09-13
Citations: 659 F.3d 722
Docket Number: No. 09-55666
Parties: Kristin ROSSUM, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Deborah L. PATRICK, Warden; Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General for the State of California, Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: Before: D.W. NELSON and STEPHEN REINHARDT, Circuit Judges, and NANCY GERTNER, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 659
Pages: 722–738

Head Matter:
Kristin ROSSUM, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Deborah L. PATRICK, Warden; Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General for the State of California, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 09-55666.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted April 6, 2010.
Filed Sept. 13, 2011.
William J. Genego, Nasatir, Hirsch, Podberesky & Genego, Santa Monica, CA, for the petitioner-appellant.
Edmund G. Brown Jr., Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gary W. Schons, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Kevin Vienna, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Kyle Niki Shaffer, Deputy Attorney General, San Diego, CA, for the respondentappellee.
Before: D.W. NELSON and STEPHEN REINHARDT, Circuit Judges, and NANCY GERTNER, District Judge.
The Honorable Nancy Gertner, District Judge for the U.S. District Court for Massachusetts, Boston, sitting by designation. Judge Gertner submitted her dissent for filing prior to her September 1, 2011 resignation from the court.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM Opinion; Dissent by Judge GERTNER.
ORDER
Respondents' petition for panel rehearing is hereby granted. The opinion filed on September 23, 2010, and published at 622 F.3d 1262 (9th Cir.2010), is withdrawn and replaced by the attached opinion.
No new petitions for panel rehearing shall be accepted in this case.
OPINION
PER CURIAM.
We conclude that this case is now controlled by the Supreme Court's intervening decision in Harrington v. Richter, 562 U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 770, 178 L.Ed.2d 624 (2011). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's denial of Kristin Rossum's petition for a writ of habeas corpus.
AFFIRMED.