Case Name: David CANTRELL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1993-08-17
Citations: 858 S.W.2d 874
Docket Number: No. 63418
Parties: David CANTRELL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 858
Pages: 874–874

Head Matter:
David CANTRELL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. 63418.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Aug. 17, 1993.
David Cantrell, pro se.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant appeals from the dismissal, for untimely filing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). .