Case Name: Cody William MARBLE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL of the State OF MONTANA and Mike Ferriter, Director of the Montana Department of Corrections is an appellee, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-10-10
Citations: 542 F. App'x 559
Docket Number: No. 10-35159
Parties: Cody William MARBLE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL of the State OF MONTANA and Mike Ferriter, Director of the Montana Department of Corrections is an appellee, Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: Before: SILVERMAN, W. FLETCHER, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 542
Pages: 559–559

Head Matter:
Cody William MARBLE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL of the State OF MONTANA and Mike Ferriter, Director of the Montana Department of Corrections is an appellee, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 10-35159.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Oct. 7, 2013.
Filed Oct. 10, 2013.
Cody William Marble, Missoula, MT, pro se.
Before: SILVERMAN, W. FLETCHER, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Cody William Marble appeals the district court's dismissal of his federal habeas petition as time-barred. We agree with the district court that Marble's petition was filed outside of the one-year statute of limitations period set forth in the Antiter-rorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d).
However, it appears that the record was not adequately developed in the district court to allow a determination of whether Marble was eligible for equitable tolling. See Holland v. Florida, 560 U.S. 631, 130 S.Ct. 2549, 2562, 177 L.Ed.2d 130 (2010). Indeed, at oral argument both sides agreed that the factual basis for Marble's claim for equitable tolling had not been fully developed in the district court, and accordingly, had not been considered by the district court. Accordingly, the district court's denial of the habeas petition is VACATED and the appeal is REMANDED for consideration of Marble's claim for equitable tolling.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.