Case Name: Lee vs. Wickliffe, &c.
Court: Kentucky Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Kentucky
Decision Date: 1824-10-14
Citations: 1 T.B. Mon. 110
Docket Number: 
Parties: Lee vs. Wickliffe, &c.
Judges: 
Reporter: Kentucky Reports
Volume: 17
Pages: 110–110

Head Matter:
Lee vs. Wickliffe, &c.
Error to the Washington Circuit; William L. Kelly, Judge.
CHANCERS1.
Café 49.
October 14.
Parties, Practice.
Hoggin, for plaintiff; Wickliffe and Huston, for ddv fondants.

Opinion:
Opinion of the Court, by
Judge Owsley.
ALL of the persons against whom the bill of Lee was exhibited1, being necessary parties, it was irregular in the court below to pronounce a final decree, dismissing the bill and dissolving the injunction with damages and costs, as to part of the defendants, and continuing the cause for further preparation as to others.
The decree must, therefore, be reversed with costs, the cause remanded and further proceedings had in that court not inconsistent with this opinion.