Case Name: Toney v. The State
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1923-11-14
Citations: 31 Ga. App. 163
Docket Number: 15005
Parties: Toney v. The State.
Judges: Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 31
Pages: 163–163

Head Matter:
15005.
Toney v. The State.
Decided November 14, 1923.
Indictment for possession of liquor; from Fulton superior court —Judge Shurley (motion for new trial before Judge Humphries). August 8, 1923.
G. G. Battle, for plaintiff in error.
John A. Boyhin, solicitor-general, B. A. Stephens, contra.

Opinion:
Bloodwortii, J.
1. Under all the facts of the case, there is no merit in any of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial.
2. There is ample evidence to support the verdict, which is approved by the judge who tried the case; and, as no error of law was committed, this court is powerless to interfere.
Judgment affirmed.
Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.