Case Name: Coy Jarvis v. The State
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1937-10-13
Citations: 133 Tex. Crim. 361
Docket Number: No. 18910
Parties: Coy Jarvis v. The State.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Criminal Reports
Volume: 133
Pages: 361–362

Head Matter:
Coy Jarvis v. The State.
No. 18910.
Delivered October 13, 1937.
Rehearing Denied December 15, 1937.
The opinion states the case.
Sam J. Hamilton, of Memphis, and Mahan & Broughton, of Childress, for appellant.
Lloyd W. Davidsom, State’s Attorney, of Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
LATTIMORE, Judge. —
Conviction for violating the Texas Liquor Control Act; punishment, a fine of $500.00 and six months confinement in the county jail.
The questions raised upon this appeal are the refusal of the court to quash the indictment because of the failure to negative certain exceptions claimed to be in the statute;-and because of the refusal of the court to submit the question as to whether the inspectors, who bought the liquor alleged to have been sold in violation of law, were accomplices. These questions have been disposed of adversely to appellant in the case of Baker v. State, 106 S. W. (2d) 308, and other cases, and in the case of Stevens v. State, No. 18823, opinion this.day handed down (page 333 of this volume).
Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.
Affirmed.