Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DAVID NICHOLS OWEN, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1993-07-14
Citations: 121 Or. App. 665
Docket Number: 91-1390; CA A75137
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DAVID NICHOLS OWEN, Appellant.
Judges: Before Richardson, Chief Judge, and Rossman and De Muniz, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 121
Pages: 665–666

Head Matter:
Submitted on record and briefs June 2,
affirmed July 14,
reconsideration denied September 29,
petition for review denied November 30, 1993 (318 Or 98)
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DAVID NICHOLS OWEN, Appellant.
(91-1390; CA A75137)
855 P2d 1141
Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem, filed the brief for appellant.
Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Thomas H. Denney, Assistant Attorney General, and Amanda Buttress, Certified Law Student, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Richardson, Chief Judge, and Rossman and De Muniz, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant was charged with six offenses. He pled guilty to five of them, and the state dismissed the sixth charge pursuant to a plea agreement that included certain sentencing recommendations. On appeal, defendant challenges the post-prison supervision period imposed. Although the state concedes that the court erred in the manner claimed by defendant, we are foreclosed from reviewing the claimed error. ORS 138.222(2)(d). State v. Adams, 315 Or 359, 847 P2d 397 (1993); State v. Kilborn, 120 Or App 462, 852 P2d 935 (1993); State v. Johnston, 120 Or App 165, 851 P2d 1156 (1993).
Affirmed.