Case Name: SCHAAD, Respondent, v. EDEBOHLS, Appellant
Court: New York Superior Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1894-07-02
Citations: 29 N.Y.S. 1149
Docket Number: 
Parties: SCHAAD, Respondent, v. EDEBOHLS, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 29
Pages: 1149–1149

Head Matter:
SCHAAD, Respondent, v. EDEBOHLS, Appellant.
(Superior Court of New York City, General Term.
July 2, 1894.)
Action by Leocadia Schaad against George M. Edebohls. Purrington & Shannon, for appellant. G. B. Boyd, for respondent.

Opinion:
FREEDMAN, J.
The complaint states but one cause of action, and it is sufficiently definite and certain. If the defendant had complained of the prolixity and redundancy of the complaint, he might have have met with better success. What he really sought to obtain was the particulars of certain allegations, and his remedy for that purpose was by motion for a bill of particulars. The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.