Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Maurice WALLS, Defendant/Appellant; Maurice WALLS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-05-16
Citations: 900 S.W.2d 1
Docket Number: Nos. 65510, 67092
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Maurice WALLS, Defendant/Appellant. Maurice WALLS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 900
Pages: 1–1

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Maurice WALLS, Defendant/Appellant. Maurice WALLS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Nos. 65510, 67092.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
May 16, 1995.
Rose M. Wibbenmeyer, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Fernando Bermudez, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals from his convictions by a jury for second degree assault, § 565.060, RSMo 1986, and armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo 1986. The court sentenced defendant as a prior offender to five years imprisonment for assault and a consecutive three year term for armed criminal action. He also appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.
We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).