Case Name: Walter Vogel, Appellant, v. Union Dime Savings Bank, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1927-10
Citations: 221 A.D. 881
Docket Number: 
Parties: Walter Vogel, Appellant, v. Union Dime Savings Bank, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 221
Pages: 881–881

Head Matter:
Walter Vogel, Appellant, v. Union Dime Savings Bank, Respondent.

Opinion:
The parties having stipulated in writing that this case may be decided by a court of four justices, the decision is as follows: Judgment reversed upon the law and new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event. We are of opinion that upon the facts here the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur applies, and that the plaintiff's evidence called for some explanation by the defendant as to the cause of the collapse of the glass panel in the door. Young, Kapper, Lazansky and Hagarty, JJ., concur.