Case Name: P. H. Nolen v. The State
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1913-12-17
Citations: 72 Tex. Crim. 450
Docket Number: No. 2870
Parties: P. H. Nolen v. The State.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Criminal Reports
Volume: 72
Pages: 450–451

Head Matter:
P. H. Nolen v. The State.
No. 2870.
Decided December 17, 1913.
Rehearing denied January 14, 1914.
1. —Carrying Pistol—Transcript—Pile Marks.
Where, upon motion for rehearing, it was shown that the clerk had inadvertently omitted to place his file marks on the transcript, the same will be considered.
2. —Same—Sufficiency of the Evidence—Intent—Peaceful Mission.
Where, upon trial of unlawfully carrying a pistol, a jury was waived and the judge tried the ease, who found from the evidence that defendant was not on a peaceful mission when he was found with a pistol, which conclusion was supported by the testimony, there was no error.
Appeal from the County Court of Hardin. Tried below before the Hon. W. W. Dies.
Appeal from a conviction of unlawfully carrying a pistol; penalty, a fine of $100.
The opinion states the case.
Singleton & Nall, for appellant.
On question of place of business and innocent intention: Mathonican v. State, 51 Texas Crim. Rep., 471, 102 S. W. Rep., 1123; Campbell v. State, 11 S. W. Rep., 832; Sanderson v. State, 50 S. W. Rep., 348; Ross v. State, 28 S. W. Rep., 199; Ball v. State, 25 S. W. Rep., 627.
C. E. Lane, Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

Opinion:
HARPER, Judge.
Appellant was prosecuted and convicted of the offense of unlawfully carrying a pistol.
The statement of facts which accompanies the record bears no file marks, and does not show when it was filed in the trial court, and under such circumstances we are not authorized to consider it. Yet, we have read it and we feel constrained to say that the trial court was fully authorized to adjudge appellant guilty of the offense charged. A jury was waived and the issue submitted to the court, and if we considered the statement of facts it would authorize the court to arrive at the conclusion at which he did arrive—that appellant was guilty of the offense charged.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.