Case Name: In the Matter of the Compensation of Phon Veopradith, Claimant. EPSON PORTLAND, INC., Petitioner, v. Phon VEOPRADITH, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1993-08-04
Citations: 122 Or. App. 293
Docket Number: WCB 91-05537; CA A77431
Parties: In the Matter of the Compensation of Phon Veopradith, Claimant. EPSON PORTLAND, INC., Petitioner, v. Phon VEOPRADITH, Respondent.
Judges: Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Landau, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 122
Pages: 293–293

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted July 2,
reversed and remanded for reconsideration August 4,
reconsideration denied October 27,
petition for review denied December 14, 1993 (318 Or 171)
In the Matter of the Compensation of Phon Veopradith, Claimant. EPSON PORTLAND, INC., Petitioner, v. Phon VEOPRADITH, Respondent.
(WCB 91-05537; CA A77431)
855 P2d 1170
Jean Back, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were Brian B. Doherty, William H. Walters and Miller, Nash, Wiener, Hager & Carlsen, Portland.
Kevin N. Keaney, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Pozzi, Wilson, Atchison, O’Leary & Conboy, Portland.
Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Landau, Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Reversed and remanded for reconsideration. Tektronix, Inc. v. Nazari, 117 Or App 409, 844 P2d 258 (1992), on recon 120 Or App 590, 853 P2d 315 (1993).