Case Name: TEICHMANN v. PARRISH
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1946-06-28
Citations: 157 F.2d 75
Docket Number: No. 9173
Parties: TEICHMANN v. PARRISH.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 157
Pages: 75–75

Head Matter:
TEICHMANN v. PARRISH.
No. 9173.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia.
Argued May 30, 1946.
Decided June 28, 1946.
Mr. J. Harry Welch, of Washington, D. C. with whom Mr. H. Mason Welch, of Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellant. Messrs. Samuel B. Block and John R. Daily, both of Washington, D. C., also entered appearances for appellant.
Mr. Robert H. McNeill, of Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Before EDGERTON, WILBUR K. MILLER and PRETTYMAN, Associate Justices.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellee has recovered damages for alleged negligent treatment administered to her by or under the direction of appellant as a physician. The evidence was conflicting. The principal question is whether the evidence favorable to appellee, if believed, supports the verdict. We find that it does. Appellant's other assignments of error are also without merit.
Affirmed.