Case Name: FIRST RESPONSE GROUP, INC., Appellant, v. Ivan B. CASTRO and Ana H. Castro, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2008-01-02
Citations: 971 So. 2d 986
Docket Number: No. 3D07-1114
Parties: FIRST RESPONSE GROUP, INC., Appellant, v. Ivan B. CASTRO and Ana H. Castro, Appellee.
Judges: Before GREEN, SHEPHERD, and SALTER, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 971
Pages: 986–986

Head Matter:
FIRST RESPONSE GROUP, INC., Appellant, v. Ivan B. CASTRO and Ana H. Castro, Appellee.
No. 3D07-1114.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan. 2, 2008.
David S. Harris, for appellant.
Ralph Ventura, for appellee.
Before GREEN, SHEPHERD, and SALTER, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
On the record before us, we cannot find that the order denying the appellant's motion to vacate default and default judgment constitutes a gross abuse of discretion. See Schwab & Co., Inc. v. Breezy Bay, Inc., 360 So.2d 117 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Bailey v. Deebold, 351 So.2d 355 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977). We therefore affirm.
Affirmed.