Case Name: Douglas SCZYGELSKI, Appellant v. UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-03-24
Citations: 599 F. App'x 390
Docket Number: No. 14-5266
Parties: Douglas SCZYGELSKI, Appellant v. UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, Appellee.
Judges: BEFORE: .ROGERS, GRIFFITH, and MILLETT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 599
Pages: 390–390

Head Matter:
Douglas SCZYGELSKI, Appellant v. UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, Appellee.
No. 14-5266.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
March 24, 2015.
Douglas Sczygelski, Bismarck, ND, pro se.
R. Craig Lawrence, Rafique Omar Anderson, Esquire, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Washington, DC, for Appellee.
BEFORE: .ROGERS, GRIFFITH, and MILLETT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the motion for summary affirmance, the opposition thereto, and the reply, it is
ORDERED that the motion be denied. The merits of the parties' positions are not so clear as to warrant summary action. See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C.Cir.1987) (per cu-riam).
Because the court has determined that summary disposition is not in order, the Clerk is instructed to calendar this case for presentation to a merits panel.