Case Name: WALKER et al. v. WARD
Court: Supreme Court of Texas
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1914-06-10
Citations: 183 S.W. 1144
Docket Number: 
Parties: WALKER et al. v. WARD.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 183
Pages: 1144–1144

Head Matter:
WALKER et al. v. WARD.
(Supreme Court of Texas.
June 10, 1914.)
Appeal and Error <S=^832(1) — Rehearing— Correction oe Entry.
Where the Supreme Court, on the original hearing of a petition for writ of error, erroneously marked the petition, which they intended to refuse, as dismissed for want of jurisdiction, a motion for rehearing will be granted for the purpose of making the proper entry.
[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Appeal and Error, Cent. Dig. §§ 3215-3218, 3220, 3223-3225; Dec. Dig. ®=»832(1).]
Action between W. G. Walker and others and A. P. Ward. On motion for rehearing on the petition of W. G. Walker and others for a writ of error.
Motion granted, and petition refused.
McCrory & Vance, of Edna, and Fiset, Mc-Clendon & Shelley, of Austin, for plaintiffs in error. L. C. McBride, of Dallas, and J. O. Rowlett, of Edna, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
PHILLIPS, J.
Upon our original consideration of the petition for writ of error in this case it was erroneously marked "dismissed for want of jurisdiction." This did not correctly represent our action on the petition, it being our purpose to refuse the writ. The motion for rehearing is accordingly granted for the purpose of the proper entry being made in the case, the petition for writ of error being refused.