Case Name: SPINKS et al. v. SECOND NAT. BANK OF WASHINGTON et al.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1954-06-10
Citations: 214 F.2d 853
Docket Number: No. 11962
Parties: SPINKS et al. v. SECOND NAT. BANK OF WASHINGTON et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 214
Pages: 853–854

Head Matter:
SPINKS et al. v. SECOND NAT. BANK OF WASHINGTON et al.
No. 11962.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued April 6, 1954.
Decided June 10, 1954.
Petition for Rehearing Denied July 13, 1954.
Mr. Kahl K. Spriggs, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. David B. Nicholson and Woodson P. Houghton, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellants.
Mr. Charles E. Pledger, Jr., Washington, D. C., for appellee William Mouat Hannay, Ill.
Messrs. William E. Leahy, Washington, D. C., and James F. Reilly, Wash ington, D. C., entered appearances for appellee The Second Nat. Bank of Washington.
Before WILBUR K. MILLER, PRET-TYMAN and BAZELON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This appeal is from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia which construed a codicil to a will. We think the trial judge's construction of the testator's language was correct for the reasons given in his opinion, 1953, 122 F.Supp. 153.
Affirmed.