Case Name: KING INSTRUMENT CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lucioano PEREGO and Tapematic, Defendants/Cross-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1995-12-05
Citations: 72 F.3d 855
Docket Number: Nos. 91-1125, 91-1132
Parties: KING INSTRUMENT CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lucioano PEREGO and Tapematic, Defendants/Cross-Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 72
Pages: 855–857

Head Matter:
KING INSTRUMENT CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lucioano PEREGO and Tapematic, Defendants/Cross-Appellants.
Nos. 91-1125, 91-1132.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Dec. 5, 1995.
David J. Brezner and Richard F. Trecar-tin, Flehr, Hohbach, Test, Albritton & Herbert, San Francisco, California, counsel for defendants/cross-appellants filed a Response to the Petition for Rehearing with a Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc. Also on the response was Nicholas H. Pandiscio, Pandis-cio & Pandiscio, Waltham, Massachusetts.
Edgar H. Haug and John R. Lane, Curtis, Morris & Safford, P.C., New York City, counsel for plaintiff-appellant filed a Petition for Rehearing with a Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc.

Opinion:
ORDER
A combined petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in banc having been filed by the CROSS-APPELLANT, and a response thereto having been invited by the court and filed by the APPELLANT, and the petition for rehearing having been referred to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the suggestion for rehearing in banc and the response having been referred to the judges who are in regular active service and who are authorized to request a poll whether to rehear the appeal in banc, and a poll having been requested, taken, and failed,
UPON CONSIDERATION THEREOF, it is
ORDERED that the petition for rehearing be, and the same hereby is, DENIED, and it is further
ORDERED that the suggestion for rehearing in banc be, and the same hereby is, DECLINED.
A separate dissent was filed by Senior Circuit Judge NIES.
Chief Judge ARCHER would rehear the appeal in banc.
The mandate of the court will issue on December 12, 1995.