Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ARTHUR ANDERSEN, LLP, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-12-05
Citations: 431 F.3d 895
Docket Number: No. 02-21200
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ARTHUR ANDERSEN, LLP, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before REAVLEY, HIGGINBOTHAM and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 431
Pages: 895–896

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ARTHUR ANDERSEN, LLP, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-21200.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 5, 2005.
Elizabeth D. Collery (argued), Sangita Katikineni Rao, U.S. Dept, of Justice, Crim. Div. App. Section, Washington, DC, James Lee Turner, Asst. U.S. Atty., Houston, TX, for U.S.
Charles Rothfeld, Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw, Maureen E. Mahoney (argued), Latham & Watkins, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before REAVLEY, HIGGINBOTHAM and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
IT IS ORDERED that appellee's unopposed motion for remand to the' United States District Court for the Southern District of Houston so the government may move to dismiss the indictment is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's unopposed motion to vacate the order of October 27, 2005, pending disposition of the appellee's motion to remand is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's unopposed motion to issue a revised supplemental briefing schedule that would begin from the date denying the governments motion for remand giving the appellant adequate time to submit a supplemental brief is DENIED as moot.