Case Name: Gull Steel Corporation, Appellant, v. Ro Contracting Corp. et al., Defendants, and Lamar Lighting Co., Inc., et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1987-12-21
Citations: 135 A.D.2d 680
Docket Number: 
Parties: Gull Steel Corporation, Appellant, v Ro Contracting Corp. et al., Defendants, and Lamar Lighting Co., Inc., et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 135
Pages: 680–680

Head Matter:
Gull Steel Corporation, Appellant, v Ro Contracting Corp. et al., Defendants, and Lamar Lighting Co., Inc., et al., Respondents.

Opinion:
— Appeal by the plaintiff from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated December 3, 1986, as denied those branches of its motion which were to amend the complaint insofar as it is asserted against the defendants Lamar Lighting Co. Inc., Kugel and Goldstein on the ground that the proposed amended complaint failed to state a cause of action against them.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Harwood at the Supreme Court. Mangano, J. P., Thompson, Bracken and Weinstein, JJ., concur.