Case Name: John Anthony LOVE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1995-11-08
Citations: 909 S.W.2d 515
Docket Number: No. 1204-94
Parties: John Anthony LOVE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 909
Pages: 515–516

Head Matter:
John Anthony LOVE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
No. 1204-94.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.
Nov. 8, 1995.
Keith S. Hampton, Austin, for appellant.
Robert Smith, Darla Espinoza, Assistant Dist. Attys., Austin, and Robert A Huttash, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
OPINION ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
PER CURIAM.
Appellant was convicted of Theft and his punishment assessed at confinement for one year. The Third Court of Appeals affirmed in Love v. State, (Tex.App.—Austin, No. 03-92-538-CR, delivered September 14, 1994). We granted discretionary review to test the vitality of our holding in Eisenhauer v. State, 754 S.W.2d 159 (Tex.Crim.App.1988) after Heitman v. State, 815 S.W.2d 681 (Tex.Crim.App.1991). However, it now appears that our decision to do so was improvident. Accordingly, the instant cause is hereby dismissed. As always, refusal or dismissal of a petition for discretionary review implies no decision on the merits.