Case Name: Ronald Satish EMRIT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Congressman Joe HECK, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-06-30
Citations: 692 F. App'x 705
Docket Number: No. 17-1364
Parties: Ronald Satish EMRIT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Congressman Joe HECK, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 692
Pages: 705–705

Head Matter:
Ronald Satish EMRIT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Congressman Joe HECK, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 17-1364
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 20, 2017
Decided: June 30, 2017
Ronald Satish Emrit, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ronald Satish Emrit appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil complaint for improper venue. On appeal, we limit our review to the issues raised in Emrit's informal brief. Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014). We have reviewed the record in light of these arguments and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. Emrit v. Heck, No. 8:17-cv-00074-PWG (D. Md. Jan. 26, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED