Case Name: Michelle BREUER, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. SYBERG'S EATING AND DRINKING COMPANY, INC., Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-09-20
Citations: 178 S.W.3d 603
Docket Number: No. ED 85561
Parties: Michelle BREUER, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. SYBERG’S EATING AND DRINKING COMPANY, INC., Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 178
Pages: 603–604

Head Matter:
Michelle BREUER, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. SYBERG’S EATING AND DRINKING COMPANY, INC., Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 85561.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Sept. 20, 2005.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 21, 2005.
Application for Transfer Denied Dec. 20, 2005.
Robert M. Heggie, Beach, Stewart, Heg-gie, Mittleman & Curtis, L.L.C., St. Louis, for respondent.
T. Michael Ward, Robert L. Brady, Brown & James, P.C., St. Louis, for appellant.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals from a judgment denying its motion to set aside a default judgment. We find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).