Case Name: In re Daniel A. WELZEL, Debtor. Advocate Realty Investments, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, Kenneth L. Royal, Plaintiff, v. Daniel A. Welzel, Defendant-Appellee. In re Daniel A. Welzel, Debtor. Advocate Realty Investments, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, Kenneth L. Royal, Plaintiff, v. Daniel A. Welzel, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-08-07
Citations: 260 F.3d 1284
Docket Number: Nos. 99-14875, 99-14876
Parties: In re Daniel A. WELZEL, Debtor. Advocate Realty Investments, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, Kenneth L. Royal, Plaintiff, v. Daniel A. Welzel, Defendant-Appellee. In re Daniel A. Welzel, Debtor. Advocate Realty Investments, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, Kenneth L. Royal, Plaintiff, v. Daniel A. Welzel, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 260
Pages: 1284–1285

Head Matter:
In re Daniel A. WELZEL, Debtor. Advocate Realty Investments, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, Kenneth L. Royal, Plaintiff, v. Daniel A. Welzel, Defendant-Appellee. In re Daniel A. Welzel, Debtor. Advocate Realty Investments, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, Kenneth L. Royal, Plaintiff, v. Daniel A. Welzel, Defendant-Appellee.
Nos. 99-14875, 99-14876.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Aug. 7, 2001.
John A. Christy, Schreeder, Wheeler & Flint, Atlanta, GA, Kenneth Lamar Royal, Royal & Vaughan, LC, Savannah, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
James Luther Drake, Jr., Karsman, Brooks & Callaway, P.C., Savannah, GA, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges.
Senior U.S. Circuit Judge Emmett R. Cox has elected to participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(c).

Opinion:
BY THE COURT;
A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the above causes shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.