Case Name: Marie Elena ABUJASEN a/k/a Marie E. Abujasen, etc., Appellant, v. Lowry DREKE, et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2013-07-10
Citations: 118 So. 3d 235
Docket Number: No. 3D12-2092
Parties: Marie Elena ABUJASEN a/k/a Marie E. Abujasen, etc., Appellant, v. Lowry DREKE, et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before CORTINAS, EMAS and LOGUE, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 118
Pages: 235–235

Head Matter:
Marie Elena ABUJASEN a/k/a Marie E. Abujasen, etc., Appellant, v. Lowry DREKE, et al., Appellees.
No. 3D12-2092.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 10, 2013.
Kogan Prober and Pavel Kogan and Bruce Prober, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
Lerman & Whitebook and Carlos Ler-man, Hollywood, for appellees.
Before CORTINAS, EMAS and LOGUE, JJ.

Opinion:
EMAS, J.
Maria Elena Abujasen appeals an order denying her motion to intervene, which was filed after the trial court's entry of a final judgment of foreclosure, and after a sale of the foreclosed property. Given (1) our standard of review in this case ;(2) the general rule that intervention is not permitted post-final judgment ; and (3) the absence of a transcript of the hearing below , we affirm the trial court's order.
In doing so, however, we note Appellees candidly conceded, both in their brief and at oral argument, that because Appellant was a nonparty to the action, the final judgment in this case does not affect any ownership interest Appellant may have in the foreclosed property.
Affirmed.
.See Barnhill v. Fla. Microsoft Anti-Trust Litigation, 905 So.2d 195 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (order on motion to intervene is reviewed under abuse of discretion standard).
. See Dickinson v. Segal, 219 So.2d 435 (Fla.1969).
. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979).