Case Name: Vear LeRoy BROOKS, Petitioner and Appellant, v. STATE of Utah, Respondent and Appellee
Court: Utah Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Utah
Decision Date: 2012-01-26
Citations: 270 P.3d 572
Docket Number: No. 20111036-CA
Parties: Vear LeRoy BROOKS, Petitioner and Appellant, v. STATE of Utah, Respondent and Appellee.
Judges: Before Judges ORME, THORNE, and CHRISTIANSEN.
Reporter: Pacific Reporter 3d
Volume: 270
Pages: 572–572

Head Matter:
2012 UT App 23
Vear LeRoy BROOKS, Petitioner and Appellant, v. STATE of Utah, Respondent and Appellee.
No. 20111036-CA.
Court of Appeals of Utah.
Jan. 26, 2012.
Vear LeRoy Brooks, Draper, Appellant Pro se.
Mark L. Shurtleff, Erin Riley, Salt Lake City, for Appellee.
Before Judges ORME, THORNE, and CHRISTIANSEN.

Opinion:
DECISION
PER CURIAM:
{1 Vear LeRoy Brooks filed a notice of appeal in the above captioned case. This is before the court on its own motion for summary disposition based on lack of jurisdiction due to the absence of a final order.
1 2 Generally, an appeal may be taken only from a final order or judgment. See Utah R.App. P. 8(a); Bradbury v. Valencia, 2000 UT 50, ¶ 9, 5 P.3d 649. For an order to be final, it must dispose of the subject matter of the case, leaving nothing else to be decided. See Bradbury, 2000 UT 50, ¶ 9, 5 P.3d 649. An appeal is improper if not taken from a final order or judgment. See id. Where an appeal is not properly taken, this court lacks jurisdiction and must dismiss it. See id. ¶ 8.
T3 This case originated in the trial court when Brooks filed a petition for postconvietion relief, In response to his amended petition, the State filed a motion to dismiss. This matter remains pending in the trial court. There is no final order for Brooks to appeal. Therefore, this court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal and must dismiss it. See id.
14 Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed without prejudice to the filing of a timely notice of appeal after the entry of a final order.