Case Name: U.S. v. Michael S. Tunstall
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-03-05
Citations: 73 M.J. 255
Docket Number: No. 12-0516/AF
Parties: U.S. v. Michael S. Tunstall.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Military Justice Reporter
Volume: 73
Pages: 255–255

Head Matter:
Wednesday, March 5, 2014
No. 12-0516/AF.
U.S. v. Michael S. Tunstall.

Opinion:
CCA 37592. Review granted on the following issue:
WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS (AFC-CA) VIOLATED UNITED STATES v. BUBER, 62 M.J. 476 (C.A.A.F. 2006), WHEN IT ONLY LOOKED AT THE CHANGE IN THE MAXIMUM POSSIBLE PUNISHMENT TO DETERMINE WHETHER THERE WAS A DRAMATIC CHANGE TO THE PENALTY LANDSCAPE, AND UNITED STATES v. MOFFEIT, 63 M.J. 40 (C.A.A.F. 2006), WHEN IT DID NOT USE THE PROPER STANDARD OF "BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT."
No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.