Case Name: Charles G. Alberts, executor, &c., complainant-respondent, v. Louisa E. Alberts and Helen L. Muller, defendants-appellants; Public Service Corporation of New Jersey, defendant
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1936-10-02
Citations: 121 N.J. Eq. 48
Docket Number: 
Parties: Charles G. Alberts, executor, &c., complainant-respondent, v. Louisa E. Alberts and Helen L. Muller, defendants-appellants; Public Service Corporation of New Jersey, defendant.
Judges: For affirmance — The Chiee- Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Heher, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, RaeEERTY, JJ. 10.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 121
Pages: 48–48

Head Matter:
Charles G. Alberts, executor, &c., complainant-respondent, v. Louisa E. Alberts and Helen L. Muller, defendants-appellants; Public Service Corporation of New Jersey, defendant.
[Argued May 29th, 1936.
Decided October 2d, 1936.]
Mr. Samuel Weitzman, for the complainant-respondent.
Messrs. Melosh, Morten ■& Melosh (Mr. Louis O. Morten), for the defendants-appellants.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This case, on another angle, was considered by us in an opinion reported in 119 N. J. Eq. 391. The record was remitted and defendants then sought leave in chancery to submit further proofs. The vice-chancellor decided that the application should be denied. No convincing reason is presented why that conclusion should be disturbed.
The decree below will be affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chiee- Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Heher, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, RaeEERTY, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.