Case Name: THOMAS KANNELLOS v. GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Court: Minnesota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Minnesota
Decision Date: 1923-12-10
Citations: 157 Minn. 505
Docket Number: No. 23,234
Parties: THOMAS KANNELLOS v. GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY.
Judges: 
Reporter: Minnesota Reports
Volume: 157
Pages: 505–506

Head Matter:
THOMAS KANNELLOS v. GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY.
December 10, 1923.
No. 23,234.
Case followed.
Appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant, entered after an order of the district court for St. Louis county, Cant, J., sustaining defendant’s demurrer to the amended complaint, had been affirmed on appeal.
Affirmed.
McCoy & Hansen, for appellant.
M. L. Countryman and Baldwin, Baldwin, Holmes & Mayall, for respondent.
Reported in 196 N. W. 280.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of the St. Louis county district court entered in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff in an action brought by the plaintiff to recover for personal injuries based upon the Federal Safety Appliance Act. The questions presented are those decided by this court on an appeal by the plaintiff from an order sustaining a general demurrer interposed by the defendant to plaintiff's complaint, which decision of this court is reported in 151 Minn. 157, 186 N. W. 389. Following the decision in that ease, the judgment is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.