Case Name: Hamlet Development Co. et al., Appellants, v. Arthur Venitt, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1983-09-27
Citations: 60 N.Y.2d 677
Docket Number: 
Parties: Hamlet Development Co. et al., Appellants, v Arthur Venitt, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 60
Pages: 677–679

Head Matter:
Hamlet Development Co. et al., Appellants, v Arthur Venitt, Respondent.
Decided September 27, 1983
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
David I. Rosenberg for appellants.
George Berger for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (95 AD2d 798).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons.