Case Name: Fareshah HOLLINGSWORTH, Petitioner, v. STAFFING CONCEPTS, Suburban Lodge, RiskCo., Respondents
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-02-06
Citations: 805 So. 2d 1111
Docket Number: No. 1D01-5109
Parties: Fareshah HOLLINGSWORTH, Petitioner, v. STAFFING CONCEPTS, Suburban Lodge, RiskCo., Respondents.
Judges: BOOTH, BARFIELD and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 805
Pages: 1111–1112

Head Matter:
Fareshah HOLLINGSWORTH, Petitioner, v. STAFFING CONCEPTS, Suburban Lodge, RiskCo., Respondents.
No. 1D01-5109.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Feb. 6, 2002.
Bill McCabe of Shepherd, McCabe & Cooley, Longwood, for petitioner.
Edward H. Hurt, Jr., Orlando; Ralph J. Humphries of Schutt, Humphries & Becker, Jacksonville, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, claimant below in a workers' compensation proceeding, asks this court to issue a writ of certiorari to review and quash the order of the Judge of Compensation Claims which denied claimant's request for an independent medical examination with a specialist whose fee would be more than is permitted by rule. See City of Riviera Beach v. Napier, 791 So.2d 1160 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). Petitioner contends that no qualified examiner in claimant's geographic area will conduct the examination for the authorized fee. We conclude that petitioner has failed to demonstrate any injury which cannot be remedied on appeal from a final order. See Boyd v. Pheo, Inc., 664 So.2d 294 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). Accordingly, the petition for writ of certiorari is denied.
PETITION DENIED.
BOOTH, BARFIELD and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.