Case Name: Joseph Lee JOYNER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. J. Michael STOUFFER, Warden; Attorney General of the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-01-14
Citations: 24 F. App'x 209
Docket Number: No. 01-6797
Parties: Joseph Lee JOYNER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. J. Michael STOUFFER, Warden; Attorney General of the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 24
Pages: 209–209

Head Matter:
Joseph Lee JOYNER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. J. Michael STOUFFER, Warden; Attorney General of the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 01-6797.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 25, 2001.
Decided Jan. 14, 2002.
Joseph Lee Joyner, Appellant Pro Se. Celia Anderson Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Joseph Lee Joyner seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.CA. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Joyner v. Stouffer, No. CA-00-1119-AMD (D.Md. Apr. 23, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.