Case Name: Darryl J. HOWARTH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-04-25
Citations: 578 So. 2d 66
Docket Number: No. 90-491
Parties: Darryl J. HOWARTH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: GRIFFIN and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 578
Pages: 66–66

Head Matter:
Darryl J. HOWARTH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 90-491.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
April 25, 1991.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Barbara L. Condon, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm. Flowers v. State, 567 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Walker v. State, 546 So.2d 764 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). Accord Carter v. State, 571 So.2d 520 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). Contra Lewis v. State, 574 So.2d 245 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).
However we certify the following question to the supreme court:
DO FLORIDA'S UNIFORM SENTENCING GUIDELINES REQUIRE THAT LEGAL CONSTRAINT POINTS BE ASSESSED FOR EACH OFFENSE COMMITTED WHILE UNDER LEGAL CONSTRAINT?
AFFIRMED.
GRIFFIN and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.
COWART, J., dissents with opinion.