Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Terry E. SMITH, Defendant/Appellant; Terry E. SMITH, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-03-28
Citations: 895 S.W.2d 642
Docket Number: Nos. 65016, 66581
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Terry E. SMITH, Defendant/Appellant. Terry E. SMITH, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before GRIMM, C.J., REINHARD, P.J., and CRAHAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 895
Pages: 642–643

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Terry E. SMITH, Defendant/Appellant. Terry E. SMITH, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Nos. 65016, 66581.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
March 28, 1995.
Robert E. Steele, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Traci J. Sanders, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before GRIMM, C.J., REINHARD, P.J., and CRAHAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury for first degree sexual assault, § 566.100, RSMo Supp.1994. He was sentenced in accord with the jury's assessment to five years' imprisonment. He also appeals from the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.
We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. Defendant does not address any points on appeal to the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion and that appeal is considered abandoned. State v. Nelson, 818 S.W.2d 285, 287 (Mo.App.1991). An opinion would have no prece-dential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).