Case Name: Eric BEISHLINE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-11-21
Citations: 913 S.W.2d 344
Docket Number: No. 67804
Parties: Eric BEISHLINE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before REINHARD, P.J., and AHRENS and RHODES, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 913
Pages: 344–344

Head Matter:
Eric BEISHLINE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. 67804.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Northern Division.
Nov. 21, 1995.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 17, 1996.
Kathleen G. Henry, Green, Hennings & Henry, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General and Cheryl A. Caponegro, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before REINHARD, P.J., and AHRENS and RHODES, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous; and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).