Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Nicholas NETTLES, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2015-08-11
Citations: 471 S.W.3d 374
Docket Number: No. ED 101095
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Nicholas NETTLES, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J. and Angela T. Quigless, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 471
Pages: 374–374

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Nicholas NETTLES, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 101095
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Filed: August 11, 2015
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied September 10, 2015
Application for Transfer Denied October 27, 2015
William J. Swift, Public Defenders Office, Woodrail Centre, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, Missouri 65203, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Adam S. Rowley, Assistant Attorney General, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65109, for Respondent;
Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J. and Angela T. Quigless, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CÚRIAM
Nicholas Nettles (Defendant) appeals the trial court's judgment, entered after a jury trial, finding him guilty of two counts of kidnapping, two counts of felonious restraint, two counts of sexual exploitation of a minor, and two counts of third-degree assault. Defendant claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal on charges for sexual exploitation of a minor and kidnapping because the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions. Defendant also contends that the felonious restraint and kidnapping charges resulted in a violation of his right to be free from double jeopardy. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and have determined that an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. Rule 30.25(b).