Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nathan Kinta WILKINS, a/k/a Kat Daddy, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-04-20
Citations: 599 F. App'x 505
Docket Number: No. 14-6225
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nathan Kinta WILKINS, a/k/a Kat Daddy, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 599
Pages: 505–505

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nathan Kinta WILKINS, a/k/a Kat Daddy, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 14-6225.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 16, 2015.
Decided: April 20, 2015.
Nathan Kinta Wilkins, Appellant Pro Se. William Glenn Perry, Office of the United States Attorney, Greenville, North Carolina; Seth Morgan Wood, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Nathan Kinta Wilkins appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Wilkins' motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Wilkins, Nos. 4:08-cr-00043-FL-1; 4:11-cv-00179-FL, 2014 WL 223454 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 21, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.