Case Name: Riccardo Darnell JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of NORTH CAROLINA, Buncombe County Judicial System District 28, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-07-03
Citations: 187 F. App'x 326
Docket Number: No. 06-6742
Parties: Riccardo Darnell JONES, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. State of NORTH CAROLINA, Buncombe County Judicial System District 28, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 187
Pages: 326–327

Head Matter:
Riccardo Darnell JONES, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. State of NORTH CAROLINA, Buncombe County Judicial System District 28, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 06-6742.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted June 22, 2006.
Decided July 3, 2006.
Riccardo Darnell Jones, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 86(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Riccardo Darnell Jones appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint for failure to state a claim on which relief could be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. State of North Carolina, No. 1:06-cv-00096 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 30, 2006). We deny Jones' motions to appoint counsel, to subpoena Leann Melton and Todd Lentz, and to authorize preparation of transcript at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED