Case Name: John J. NEILLY, Jr., Appellant, v. MARK JAY KAUFMAN, P.A., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1986-11-25
Citations: 497 So. 2d 1315
Docket Number: No. BL-8
Parties: John J. NEILLY, Jr., Appellant, v. MARK JAY KAUFMAN, P.A., Appellee.
Judges: ERVIN and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 497
Pages: 1315–1316

Head Matter:
John J. NEILLY, Jr., Appellant, v. MARK JAY KAUFMAN, P.A., Appellee.
No. BL-8.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nov. 25, 1986.
Stephen A. Rappenecker, of Stephen A. Rappenecker, P.A., Gainesville, for appellant.
Kenneth E. Brooten, Jr., of Kenneth E. Brooten, Jr., P.A., Gainesville, for appellee.

Opinion:
BARFIELD, Judge.
The trial court could not properly issue the injunction in this case because there was no showing of continuing conduct with the likelihood of irreparable harm and no showing that an adequate remedy at law was not available. This was not a disciplinary proceeding under the Florida Bar Integration Rule, article XI, Rule 11.14. The preliminary injunction dated December 20, 1985, against John J. Neilly, Jr., is QUASHED.
ERVIN and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.