Case Name: The State of Washington, on the Relation of Steve Reap et al., Plaintiffs, v. Ralph C. Bell, Respondent
Court: Washington Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Washington
Decision Date: 1930-06-04
Citations: 157 Wash. 696
Docket Number: No. 22568
Parties: The State of Washington, on the Relation of Steve Reap et al., Plaintiffs, v. Ralph C. Bell, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Washington Reports
Volume: 157
Pages: 696–697

Head Matter:
[No. 22568.
Department Two.
June 4, 1930.]
The State of Washington, on the Relation of Steve Reap et al., Plaintiffs, v. Ralph C. Bell, Respondent.
Anderson & Richards and Earl W. Husted, for relators.
Charles R. Denney, for respondent.
Reported in 289 Pac. 27.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This is a similar case to that of State ex rel. Miller v. Bell, ante p. 279, 289 Pac. 25.
In this case there are two counts in the information, alleging that relators, at different dates, in Snohomish county did unlawfully and feloniously carry about with them for the purpose of un lawful sale a quantity of intoxicating liquor, other than alcohol, to wit, about five gallons of moonshine whisky.
For the reasons stated in the case of State ex rel. Miller v. Bell, supra, the alternative writ is quashed and the peremptory writ denied.