Case Name: Robert Lee JENKINS, a/k/a Robert L. Jenkins, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Gregory Knowlin, Warden, Turbeville Correctional Institution; Sherri Scott, Sergeant TCI; Nurse Garrett, TCI; Angela R. Brown, Hearing Officer, TCI, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-03-09
Citations: 415 F. App'x 473
Docket Number: No. 11-6039
Parties: Robert Lee JENKINS, a/k/a Robert L. Jenkins, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Gregory Know-lin, Warden, Turbeville Correctional Institution; Sherri Scott, Sergeant TCI; Nurse Garrett, TCI; Angela R. Brown, Hearing Officer, TCI, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 415
Pages: 473–473

Head Matter:
Robert Lee JENKINS, a/k/a Robert L. Jenkins, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Gregory Know-lin, Warden, Turbeville Correctional Institution; Sherri Scott, Sergeant TCI; Nurse Garrett, TCI; Angela R. Brown, Hearing Officer, TCI, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 11-6039.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 28, 2011.
Decided: March 9, 2011.
Robert Lee Jenkins, Appellant Pro Se. James M. Davis, Jr., Davidson & Linde-mann, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Robert Lee Jenkins, a state prisoner, appeals the district court's order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying rélief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jenkins v. South Carolina Dep't of Corr., No. 8:09-cv-03293-RMG, 2010 WL 5418903 (D.S.C. Dec. 23, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.