Case Name: Randolph CREWS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FIRST TRANSIT, Successor in Interest, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-08-28
Citations: 196 F. App'x 154
Docket Number: No. 06-1051
Parties: Randolph CREWS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. FIRST TRANSIT, Successor in Interest, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 196
Pages: 154–155

Head Matter:
Randolph CREWS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. FIRST TRANSIT, Successor in Interest, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 06-1051.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 24, 2006.
Decided: Aug. 28, 2006.
Randolph Crews, Appellant Pro Se.
Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Randolph Crews seeks to appeal the dismissal of his complaint without prejudice for failure to state a claim. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Crews seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1067 (4th Cir.1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.