Case Name: EARL DUFOUR, Petitioner, v. AL SEYMOUR and THE INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION, Respondents
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1929-08-24
Citations: 100 Cal. App. 434
Docket Number: Civ. No. 7004
Parties: EARL DUFOUR, Petitioner, v. AL SEYMOUR and THE INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports
Volume: 100
Pages: 434–434

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 7004.
First Appellate District, Division One.
August 24, 1929.]
EARL DUFOUR, Petitioner, v. AL SEYMOUR and THE INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION, Respondents.
Fabian D. Brown and Wm. B. Hornblower for Petitioner.
G. C. Faulkner for Respondents.

Opinion:
THE COURT.
The testimony in the above-entitled matter seems to present a substantial conflict upon the question of whether or not the petitioner was injured in the course of his employment; and in that state of the record the finding of the respondent commission is controlling. The application for the writ is, therefore, denied upon that ground.