Case Name: Jack Smith et al., Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Texas, Defendant in Error
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1929-03-06
Citations: 112 Tex. Crim. 567
Docket Number: Nos. 12321, 12324, 12325, 12326
Parties: Jack Smith et al., Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Texas, Defendant in Error.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Criminal Reports
Volume: 112
Pages: 567–573

Head Matter:
Jack Smith et al., Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Texas, Defendant in Error.
Nos. 12321, 12324, 12325, 12326.
Delivered March 6, 1929.
Nos. 12321, 12324, 12325, 12326.
Rehearing denied June 5, 1929.
TV. T. Williams of Austin, for plaintiff in error.
A. A. Dawson of Canton, State’s Attorney, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
MARTIN, Judge.
— A bond forfeiture judgment was entered by the District Court of Galveston County against plaintiffs in error and is before this Court for review. The law questions and the record are practically identical with those in Cause No. 12313, Louise Magless et al. v. State of Texas, this day decided, and reference is made to the opinion in said cause for questions involved. The law questions presented are such as are raised for the first time on appeal and cannot be considered, except the assignment of error questioning the rendition of a final judgment drawing six per cent interest against plaintiffs in error. It was decided in Cause No. 12313, above 'mentioned, that such a judgment could not be made to bear interest.
There being no reversible errors in the record, the judgment herein is so reformed as to exclude interest and as reformed will be affirmed. ,
Affirmed.
The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals 'and approved by the Court.