Case Name: Reinhold WENGLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dennis B. HARTER, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1971-04-26
Citations: 439 F.2d 1199
Docket Number: No. 25907
Parties: Reinhold WENGLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dennis B. HARTER, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 439
Pages: 1199–1199

Head Matter:
Reinhold WENGLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dennis B. HARTER, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 25907.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
April 26, 1971.
Richard D. Welsh (argued), David N. Ingman, Honolulu, Hawaii, for appellant.
James E. T. Koshiba (argued), Bert T. Kobayashi, Jr., George R. Ariyoshi, Honolulu, Hawaii, for appellee.
Before KOELSCH, CARTER and KIL-KENNY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appellant contends that there was error in the refusal of the trial judge to instruct on the doctrine of the last clear chance. The state of the evidence in the case did not require the giving of the instruction.
Judgment affirmed.