Case Name: Linda C. VILES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-10-27
Citations: 401 F. App'x 230
Docket Number: No. 09-35783
Parties: Linda C. VILES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before: PREGERSON, WARDLAW and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 401
Pages: 230–231

Head Matter:
Linda C. VILES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 09-35783.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted July 14, 2010.
Filed Oct. 27, 2010.
Alan Graf, Alan Stuart Graf, PC, Summertown, TN, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Richard A. Morris, Esquire, SSA — Social Security Administration, Office of the General Counsel, Seattle, WA, Adrian Lee Brown, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Portland, OR, for DefendantAppellee.
Before: PREGERSON, WARDLAW and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Appellant Linda C. Viles challenges the district court's judgment upholding Appellee Commissioner of Social Security's determination that Viles was not disabled.
As the parties recognized during oral argument, this was a close case, with the record containing conflicting evidence regarding whether the claimant was disabled. When there are conflicting views of the medical evidence and the Administrative Law Judge selects one view over the other, our precedent mandates affirmance. See Tommasetti v. Astrue, 533 F.3d 1035, 1038 (9th Cir.2008) (recognizing that "[t]he court will uphold the ALJ's conclusion when the evidence is susceptible to more than one rational interpretation") (citations omitted).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.