Case Name: Philip Siegel, Respondent, v. Seidenberg, Heroes & Dratfield, Inc., Defendant, Impleaded with Louis Rothstein, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1932-12-20
Citations: 237 A.D. 129
Docket Number: 
Parties: Philip Siegel, Respondent, v. Seidenberg, Heroes & Dratfield, Inc., Defendant, Impleaded with Louis Rothstein, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 237
Pages: 129–129

Head Matter:
Philip Siegel, Respondent, v. Seidenberg, Heroes & Dratfield, Inc., Defendant, Impleaded with Louis Rothstein, Appellant.
First Department,
December 20, 1932.
Harmon Ackerman of counsel [Edyth Widdi with him on the brief], for the appellant.
Jacdb M. Zinaman, for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The order appealed from should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied. A judgment directing the payment of a sum of money is enforcible only by execution. (See Civ. Prac. Act, § 504, 505; Harris v. Elliott, 163 N. Y. 269.)
Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Martin, Sherman and Townley, JJ.
Order reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.