Case Name: Harold YOUNG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1978-09-20
Citations: 362 So. 2d 696
Docket Number: No. 77-1436
Parties: Harold YOUNG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: BOARDMAN, Acting C. J., and SCHEB and DANAHY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 362
Pages: 696–697

Head Matter:
Harold YOUNG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 77-1436.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Sept. 20, 1978.
Jack 0. Johnson, Public Defender, and James R. Wulchak, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and William I. Munsey, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we find the appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error; therefore, the judgment appealed is affirmed.
The only point which merits discussion is the propriety of the appellant's sentence to confinement "at hard labor." To be imprisoned "at hard labor" is improper because no existing state statute provides for its imposition as a sentence for any offense. Spel ler v. State, 305 So.2d 231 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974).
Remanded for the purpose of striking the language "at hard labor" from the sentencing order; otherwise affirmed. Appellant need not be present for this purpose.
BOARDMAN, Acting C. J., and SCHEB and DANAHY, JJ., concur.