Case Name: W. H. FAULKNER v. J. P. STRICKLAND et al.
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 1923-10-31
Citations: 186 N.C. 771
Docket Number: 
Parties: W. H. FAULKNER v. J. P. STRICKLAND et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: North Carolina Reports
Volume: 186
Pages: 771–772

Head Matter:
W. H. FAULKNER v. J. P. STRICKLAND et al.
(Filed 31 October, 1923.)
Appeal by defendant, J. P. Strickland, from Devin, J., at March Term, 1923, of CumbeblaNd.
Civil action tried upon the following issues:
“1. Did the plaintiff enter into a contract with the defendant Strickland to find a purchaser for the timberland, as alleged? Answer: ‘Yes.’
“2. If so, <jid the plaintiff find a purchaser for said timberlands who was able, ready and willing to purchase the same at the price and on the terms authorized by the said defendant ? Answer: ‘Yes.’
“3. What amount, if anything, is the plaintiff entitled to recover of the defendant-Strickland for his services in said matter? Answer: $‘3,405.’ ”
Judgment on the verdict in favor of plaintiff. Defendant appeals, assigning errors.
Nimoclcs & Nimoclcs and W. 0. Downing for plaintiff.
Bullard & Btringfield for defendant.

Opinion:
Pee Cueiam.
Upon warmly contested issues of fact, tbe jury bas accepted tbe plaintiff's version of tbe matters bere in dispute, and we bave discovered no valid reason for disturbing tbe result of tbe trial below. A careful examination of tbe record discloses no prejudicial or reversible error. Tbe verdict and judgment will be upheld.
No error.