Case Name: MATUSOFF v. SHALF
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1926-12-30
Citations: 5 Ohio Law Abs. 75
Docket Number: No. 20239
Parties: MATUSOFF v. SHALF
Judges: 
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 5
Pages: 75–75

Head Matter:
MATUSOFF v. SHALF
No. 20239.
Supreme Court
Dock. Dec. 30, 1926,
5 Abs. 27.
Attorneys — W. S. Rhotehamel and I. L. Jackson for Matusoff; J.| H. Shively and C. D. Thompson for Shalf; all of Dayton.

Opinion:
Isaac Matusoff et contends in the Supreme Court that when he procured an' exchange of real estate, the same entitles him to full commission even though he was working under contract to find a purchaser ready and willing to buy.