Case Name: The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Cornelison, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2016-05-17
Citations: 146 Ohio St. 3d 220
Docket Number: No. 2014-1402
Parties: The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Cornelison, Appellant.
Judges: O’Connor, C.J., and PfeifeR, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 146
Pages: 220–221

Head Matter:
The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Cornelison, Appellant.
2016-Ohio-2968.]
(No. 2014-1402
— Submitted April 7, 2016
— Decided May 17, 2016.)
Charles E. Coulson, Lake County Prosecuting Attorney, and Alana A. Rezaee, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
Derek Cek, for appellant.

Opinion:
{¶ 1} In State v. Marcum, 146 Ohio St.3d 516, 2016-Ohio-1002, 59 N.E.3d 1231, we held that R.C. 2953.08(G)(2) allows an appellate court to increase, reduce, or otherwise modify a sentence only when it clearly and convincingly finds that the sentence is (1) contrary to law or (2) unsupported by the record. Id. at ¶ 7.
{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals in the instant case is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of Marcum.
O'Connor, C.J., and PfeifeR, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O'Neill, JJ., concur.