Case Name: Lena McQUEEN, Appellant, v. BRUNO'S INC., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-03-02
Citations: 593 So. 2d 1229
Docket Number: No. 91-2188
Parties: Lena McQUEEN, Appellant, v. BRUNO’S INC., Appellee.
Judges: SHIVERS and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 593
Pages: 1229–1229

Head Matter:
Lena McQUEEN, Appellant, v. BRUNO’S INC., Appellee.
No. 91-2188.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
March 2, 1992.
Rehearing Denied March 18, 1992.
Robert M. Loehr, Levin, Middlebrooks, Mabie, Thomas, Mayes & Mitchell, P.A., Pensacola, for appellant.
Rainey C. Booth and Reynolds E. Pitts, Jr., Fuller, Johnson & Farrell, P.A., Pensacola, for appellee.

Opinion:
WIGGINTON, Judge.
Appellant appeals a final summary judgment entered in favor of appellee in her slip and fall action against appellee. We reverse.
We find that the pleadings, depositions, and answers to interrogatories in this case do not demonstrate conclusively that appellant cannot prevail. The deposition testimony of appellant's son creates inferences and presents questions for the trier of fact to resolve. Therefore, summary judgment was improper in this case. Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.510(c); Holland v. Verheul, 583 So.2d 788 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).
REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
SHIVERS and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.