Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Geiman REYES, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-02-21
Citations: 556 F. App'x 334
Docket Number: No. 13-40724
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Geiman REYES, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 556
Pages: 334–335

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Geiman REYES, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-40724
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Feb. 21, 2014.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Timothy William Crooks, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Michael Lance Herman, Assistant Federal Public Defend er, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Geiman Reyes raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Betancourt, 586 F.3d 303, 308-09 (5th Cir.2009), which held that knowledge of drug type and quantity is not an element of the offense under 21 U.S.C. § 841. The appellant's motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.