Case Name: Glenroy SALMON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2001-10-31
Citations: 798 So. 2d 828
Docket Number: No. 3D01-2143
Parties: Glenroy SALMON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and SORONDO, and RAMIREZ, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 798
Pages: 828–829

Head Matter:
Glenroy SALMON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D01-2143.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 31, 2001.
Glenroy Salmon, in proper person.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and SORONDO, and RAMIREZ, JJ.

Opinion:
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING, AND OR REHEARING EN BANC
PER CURIAM.
We grant the motion for rehearing. As in Major v. State, 790 So.2d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001), we certify that we have passed on the following question of great public importance:
WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAS A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?