Case Name: In the Matter of the Compensation of Jack Steimer, Claimant. STEIMER, Petitioner, v. BOISE CASCADE CORPORATION, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1984-02-15
Citations: 67 Or. App. 11
Docket Number: 81-08623; CA A28143
Parties: In the Matter of the Compensation of Jack Steimer, Claimant. STEIMER, Petitioner, v. BOISE CASCADE CORPORATION, Respondent.
Judges: Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Newman, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 67
Pages: 11–12

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted December 9,1983,
reversed and remanded February 15,1984
In the Matter of the Compensation of Jack Steimer, Claimant. STEIMER, Petitioner, v. BOISE CASCADE CORPORATION, Respondent.
(81-08623; CA A28143)
675 P2d 517
Christopher D. Moore, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Malagon and Associates, Eugene.
Paul J. DeMuniz, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Garrett, Seideman, Hemann, Robertson & De Muniz, P.C., Salem.
Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Newman, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Reversed and remanded to the Board to determine under ORS 656.295(5) whether the case should be remanded to the referee, because it has been "improperly, incompletely or otherwise insufficiently developed or heard by the referee." Bailey v. SAIF, 296 Or 41, 672 P2d 333 (1983).