Case Name: Carl SHINN, Employee/Appellant, v. MISSOURI STATE TREASURER, Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-10-12
Citations: 9 S.W.3d 641
Docket Number: No. ED 75316
Parties: Carl SHINN, Employee/Appellant, v. MISSOURI STATE TREASURER, Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANDALL, P.J. and KAROHL, J. and HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 9
Pages: 641–642

Head Matter:
Carl SHINN, Employee/Appellant, v. MISSOURI STATE TREASURER, Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Respondent.
No. ED 75316.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Oct. 12, 1999.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 5, 2000.
Harry J. Nichols, Patrick L. Howe, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Paul K. Petraberg. Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Louis, for respondent.
Before CRANDALL, P.J. and KAROHL, J. and HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Carl Shinn (Employee) appeals from the decision issued by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) denying compensation from the Second Injury Fund (Fund). Employee contends the Commission erred in determining: 1) Employee's primary injury did not result in any permanent disability and 2) Employ ee's primary accident and preexisting disabilities did not combine synergistically.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal. The order of the Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. No error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value.
We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).