Case Name: Larry WOOLFORK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHESAPEAKE MAIL CLERK, Mail Clerk; John Newhart, Sheriff, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-09-15
Citations: 332 F. App'x 71
Docket Number: No. 09-6840
Parties: Larry WOOLFORK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHESAPEAKE MAIL CLERK, Mail Clerk; John Newhart, Sheriff, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 332
Pages: 71–71

Head Matter:
Larry WOOLFORK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHESAPEAKE MAIL CLERK, Mail Clerk; John Newhart, Sheriff, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 09-6840.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 10, 2009.
Decided: Sept. 15, 2009.
Larry Woolfork, Appellant Pro Se.
Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Larry Woolfork appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Woolfork v. Chesapeake Mail Clerk, No. 1:09-cv-00198-AJT-TCB (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 15, 2009, entered Apr. 16, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.