Case Name: Jerry Lamont LINDSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R.C. LEE, Warden, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-02-27
Citations: 30 F. App'x 98
Docket Number: No. 01-7858
Parties: Jerry Lamont LINDSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R.C. LEE, Warden, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 30
Pages: 98–98

Head Matter:
Jerry Lamont LINDSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R.C. LEE, Warden, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 01-7858.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 14, 2002.
Decided Feb. 27, 2002.
Jerry Lamont Lindsey, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Jerry Lamont Lindsey seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because Lindsey's notice of appeal was not timely filed.
Parties are accorded thirty days after entry of the district court's final judgment or order to note an appeal, see Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (1960)).
The district court's order was entered on the docket on May 30, 2001. Lindsey's notice of appeal was filed on October 9, 2001. Because Lindsey failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.