Case Name: Bruce Curtis BRADNEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1966-05-03
Citations: 185 So. 2d 726
Docket Number: No. 65-749
Parties: Bruce Curtis BRADNEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before HENDRY, C. J., and PEARSON and BARKDULL, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 185
Pages: 726–726

Head Matter:
Bruce Curtis BRADNEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 65-749.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
May 3, 1966.
Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender and Phillip A. Hubbart, Asst. Public Defender, ■for appellant.
Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Arden M. Siegendorf, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before HENDRY, C. J., and PEARSON and BARKDULL, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellant seeks review of a judgment and sentence entered against him following a jury verdict finding him guilty of the crime of robbery.
The record reveals that the appellant and another man held up the bartender and several patrons in a lounge. The appellant used a gun to commit the holdup. He was subsequently charged with the crime of robbery, to which he entered a plea of not guilty, and the cause proceeded to a jury trial. At the conclusion of all the evidence, the trial court refused to give the appellant's requested charge on the lesser included offense of aggravated assault.
The appellant contends that the trial court committed reversible error in refusing to charge the jury on the lesser included offense. We do not agree. The information charging the appellant with the crime of robbery did not allege use of a deadly weapon. Thus, the trial court was. not required to instruct the jury on aggravated assault. See: Lindsey v. State, 53 Fla. 56, 43 So. 87; Allison v. State, Fla.App.1964, 162 So.2d 922.
Therefore, the verdict, adjudication and sentence here under review is hereby affirmed.
Affirmed.