Case Name: HIGH POINT SPRINKLER COMPANY OF ATLANTA, INC. et al. v. GEORGE HYMAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY et al.
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1981-10-27
Citations: 160 Ga. App. 192
Docket Number: 62746
Parties: HIGH POINT SPRINKLER COMPANY OF ATLANTA, INC. et al. v. GEORGE HYMAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY et al.
Judges: Deen, P. J., and Carley, J., concur.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 160
Pages: 192–192

Head Matter:
62746.
HIGH POINT SPRINKLER COMPANY OF ATLANTA, INC. et al. v. GEORGE HYMAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY et al.
Decided October 27, 1981.
Charles Ratz, for appellants.
W. Hensell Harris, Jr., for appellees.

Opinion:
Banke, Judge.
This is an appeal by the defendants from a judgment for the plaintiff contractor in a suit to recover for breach of a subcontract. The case was tried without a jury. In ruling for the plaintiff, the court made no findings of fact, but merely concluded as a matter of law that the contract was valid, that the defendants were bound by it, and that the plaintiff had incurred $80,374.30 in damages as the result of the defendants' failure to perform. Held:
The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for entry of proper findings of fact and conclusions of law as to all material issues, as required by Code Ann. § 81A-152 (a). See Doyal Development Co. v. Blair, 234 Ga. 261 (215 SE2d 471) (1975); Spivey v. Mayson, 124 Ga. App. 775 (186 SE2d 154) (1971); Barkwell v. Helms, 137 Ga. App. 290 (223 SE2d 485) (1976).
Judgment vacated and case remanded.
Deen, P. J., and Carley, J., concur.