Case Name: BANDER v. BRESLAUER et al.
Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1947-07-12
Citations: 7 F.R.D. 480
Docket Number: Civ. No. 41-59
Parties: BANDER v. BRESLAUER et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Rules Decisions
Volume: 7
Pages: 480–480

Head Matter:
BANDER v. BRESLAUER et al.
Civ. No. 41-59.
District Court, S. D. New York.
July 12, 1947.
Bogart & Lonergan, of New York City, for plaintiff.
Levien, Singer & Neuberger, of New York City, for defendant.

Opinion:
KNOX, District Judge.
The-within motion is denied, and for two reasons: (1) The ¡Civil Rules of Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, have been in effect for almost nine years, and by this time, compliance therewith, particularly upon the part of a plaintiff, should almost be automatic, (2) the matter as to whether plaintiff is within the coverage of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., can be more accurately determined by a judge than by a jury.