Case Name: MILLIKEN-TOMLINSON COMPANY v. AMERICAN SUGAR REFINING COMPANY
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1926-03-16
Citations: 10 F.2d 973
Docket Number: No. 1825
Parties: MILLIKEN-TOMLINSON COMPANY v. AMERICAN SUGAR REFINING COMPANY.
Judges: Before BINGHAM and JOHNSON, Circuit Judges, and BREWSTER, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 10
Pages: 973–973

Head Matter:
MILLIKEN-TOMLINSON COMPANY v. AMERICAN SUGAR REFINING COMPANY.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
March 16, 1926.)
No. 1825.
For former opinion, see 9 F.(2d) 809.
Before BINGHAM and JOHNSON, Circuit Judges, and BREWSTER, District Judge.

Opinion:
BREWSTER, District Judge.
A petition for rehearing has been filed in this ease by the plaintiff in error, presenting nine distinct grounds upon which the petition is based. Each of these grounds presents a question which was fully discussed in the opinion of this court handed down November 25, 1925.
A consideration of the petition reveals no new matter, nor any errors of sufficient moment to induce a majority of the court to alter or modify any conclusion reached.
In view of such a situation, it seems unnecessary to now deal with or grant a rehearing for .the purpose of further considering the many ramifications of the case, which the petition for rehearing involves.
Petition denied.