Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos Andres GUZMAN-SUAREZ, also known as Roberto Benarrivo Mendoza, also known as Nelson Fonseca, also known as Carlos Guzman, also known as Carlos Andreas Guzman, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-08-25
Citations: 195 F. App'x 252
Docket Number: No. 05-20520
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos Andres GUZMAN-SUAREZ, also known as Roberto Benarrivo Mendoza, also known as Nelson Fonseca, also known as Carlos Guzman, also known as Carlos Andreas Guzman, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before DAVIS, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 195
Pages: 252–253

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos Andres GUZMAN-SUAREZ, also known as Roberto Benarrivo Mendoza, also known as Nelson Fonseca, also known as Carlos Guzman, also known as Carlos Andreas Guzman, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-20520.
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Decided Aug. 25, 2006.
James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern Dis trict of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.
Larry Chris lies, Roekport, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before DAVIS, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Larry Chris lies, the attorney appointed to represent Carlos Andres Guzman-Suarez (Guzman), has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Guzman has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel's brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.