Case Name: Ms. Shawnte Anne LEVY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC.; Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services; Mr. Gregg L. Hershberger, Commissioner; Mr. Frank B. Bishop, Warden, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-02-01
Citations: 710 F. App'x 157
Docket Number: No. 17-7160
Parties: Ms. Shawnte Anne LEVY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC.; Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services; Mr. Gregg L. Hershberger, Commissioner; Mr. Frank B. Bishop, Warden, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 710
Pages: 157–158

Head Matter:
Ms. Shawnte Anne LEVY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC.; Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services; Mr. Gregg L. Hershberger, Commissioner; Mr. Frank B. Bishop, Warden, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 17-7160
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: January 30, 2018
Decided: February 1, 2018
Shawnte Anne Levy, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Barry Chazen, Douglas Conrad Meister, Gina Marie Smith, MEYERS, RODBELL & ROSENBAUM, PA, River-dale, Maryland; Dorianne Avery Meloy, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in' this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Shawnte Anne Levy appeals the district court's order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Levy v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc., No. 8:14-cv-03678-TDC (D. Md. Aug. 9, 2017). We deny Levy's motion for emergency physical examination and surgical treatment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED