Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Terry LOVELESS, Defendant/Appellant; Terry LOVELESS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1993-12-07
Citations: 865 S.W.2d 897
Docket Number: Nos. 61554, 63734
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Terry LOVELESS, Defendant/Appellant. Terry LOVELESS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 865
Pages: 897–898

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Terry LOVELESS, Defendant/Appellant. Terry LOVELESS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Nos. 61554, 63734.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Dec. 7, 1993.
Gary E. Brotherton, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Stacy L. Anderson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals his conviction, by a jury, of first degree assault, § 565.050, RSMo 1986. He was sentenced in accordance with the jury's verdict to eighteen years imprisonment. He also appeals the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.
We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).