Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Neville McBEAN, Defendant/Appellant; Neville McBEAN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1994-09-16
Citations: 886 S.W.2d 148
Docket Number: Nos. 63798, 65152
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Neville McBEAN, Defendant/Appellant. Neville McBEAN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANE, P.J., and CARL R. GAERTNER and CRANDALL, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 886
Pages: 148–149

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Neville McBEAN, Defendant/Appellant. Neville McBEAN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Nos. 63798, 65152.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Sept. 16, 1994.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 31, 1994.
Tamara Detloff, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breek K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before CRANE, P.J., and CARL R. GAERTNER and CRANDALL, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Neville McBean appeals his conviction for manslaughter, in violation of former § 565.005 RSMo (1978, repealed 1984). McBean also appeals from an order denying his Rule 29.15 motion on the merits without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court's judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 80.25(b) and Rule 84.16(b).