Case Name: Eliceo RODRIGUEZ a/k/a Eliceo Acosta a/k/a Enrique Acosta a/k/a Johnny, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1986-02-25
Citations: 483 So. 2d 557
Docket Number: No. 85-1539
Parties: Eliceo RODRIGUEZ a/k/a Eliceo Acosta a/k/a Enrique Acosta a/k/a Johnny, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 483
Pages: 557–557

Head Matter:
Eliceo RODRIGUEZ a/k/a Eliceo Acosta a/k/a Enrique Acosta a/k/a Johnny, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 85-1539.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 25, 1986.
Eliceo Rodriguez, in pro. per.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender's memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of this appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings, we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender's said motion to withdraw is granted. State v. Enmund, 476 So.2d 165 (Fla.1985).
AFFIRMED.