Case Name: Florence W. Vaughan, Respondent, v. Harry E. Hollingsworth and Another, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1926-12
Citations: 218 A.D. 844
Docket Number: 
Parties: Florence W. Vaughan, Respondent, v. Harry E. Hollingsworth and Another, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 218
Pages: 844–844

Head Matter:
Florence W. Vaughan, Respondent, v. Harry E. Hollingsworth and Another, Appellants.

Opinion:
Order denying defendants' motion to dismiss complaint on the ground that there was another action pending between the parties for the same relief, affirmed, without costs, it appearing that since the entry of the order appealed from the former action has been discontinued. (See Crossman v. Universal Rubber Co., 131 N. Y. 636; Beals v. Cameron, 3 How. Pr. 414; Averill v. Patterson, 10 N. Y. 500.) Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Young, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ., concur.