Case Name: PHILADELPHIA AND CAMDEN FERRY COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. INTER-CITY LINK RAILROAD COMPANY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1909-03-01
Citations: 77 N.J.L. 616
Docket Number: 
Parties: PHILADELPHIA AND CAMDEN FERRY COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. INTER-CITY LINK RAILROAD COMPANY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
Judges: For affirmance—Tiie CiiaNCEllor, Ci-tief Justice, Reed, T'RENCHARD, PARKER, BERGEN, VOORHEES, MlNTÜRN, Bo-GERT, VrEDENBUEGH, VrOOM, GRAY, DlLL, J.J. 13.
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 77
Pages: 616–616

Head Matter:
PHILADELPHIA AND CAMDEN FERRY COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. INTER-CITY LINK RAILROAD COMPANY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
Argued December 3, 1908
Decided March 1, 1909.
On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 47 Vrooni 50.
For the plaintiff in error, Gaskill & Gaskill.
For the defendant in error, Marlin V. Bergen, Jr.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Garrison in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance—Tiie CiiaNCEllor, Ci-tief Justice, Reed, T'RENCHARD, PARKER, BERGEN, VOORHEES, MlNTÜRN, Bo-GERT, VrEDENBUEGH, VrOOM, GRAY, DlLL, J.J. 13.
For reversal—None.