Case Name: THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF JERSEY CITY, RESPONDENT, v. BROOKLYN EASTERN DISTRICT TERMINAL, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1913-06-18
Citations: 84 N.J.L. 760
Docket Number: 
Parties: THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF JERSEY CITY, RESPONDENT, v. BROOKLYN EASTERN DISTRICT TERMINAL, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 84
Pages: 760–760

Head Matter:
THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF JERSEY CITY, RESPONDENT, v. BROOKLYN EASTERN DISTRICT TERMINAL, APPELLANT.
Argued March 14, 1913
Decided June 18, 1913.
On appeal from the Hudson Circuit Court.
For the plaintiff, James J. Murphy and Warren Dixon.
For the defendant, Edwards & Smith and George Holmes.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
For the reasons given in the opinion filed in the case of Jersey City v. Washburn Bros. Co., cante p. 719, the judgment in this ease will be reversed to the end that a venire de novo may be awarded.
For affirmance — None.
For reversal — Ti-ie Chancellor, Ci-iiee Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Congdon, White, Teri-iune, JJ. 13.