Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HUMBOLDT FIR, INC., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1980-03-12
Citations: 625 F.2d 330
Docket Number: No. 77-3594
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HUMBOLDT FIR, INC., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 625
Pages: 330–330

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HUMBOLDT FIR, INC., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 77-3594.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
March 12, 1980.
Robert E. Phelan, Rothschild, Phelan & Montali, San Francisco, Cal., argued, for defendant-appellant.
Nancy B. Firestone, Atty., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff-appel-lee.

Opinion:
ORDER
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.
Before BROWNING and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges, and EAST, Senior District Judge.
We affirm on the grounds set forth in the opinion of the district court. See In re Humboldt Fir, Inc., 426 F.Supp. 292 (N.D. Cal. 1977).
Honorable William G. East, Senior Judge, United States District Court, District of Oregon, sitting by designation.