Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. David DIXON, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-09-21
Citations: 144 S.W.3d 316
Docket Number: No. ED 83031
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. David DIXON, Appellant.
Judges: Before GEORGE W. DRAPER III, C.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 144
Pages: 316–317

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. David DIXON, Appellant.
No. ED 83031.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Sept. 21, 2004.
Sarah Weber Patel, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant.
Andrea K. Spillars, Charnette D. Douglas, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before GEORGE W. DRAPER III, C.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
David Dixon appeals from the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of possession of a controlled substance in violation of section 195.202, RSMo 2000. He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence.
Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude there was sufficient evidence to support his conviction. State v. Langdon, 110 S.W.3d 807, 811 (Mo. banc 2003). An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum for their use only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).