Case Name: In the Matter of Carlton E. Rouse, Appellant, v. City of New York et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2004-03-23
Citations: 5 A.D.3d 274
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Carlton E. Rouse, Appellant, v City of New York et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 5
Pages: 274–274

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Carlton E. Rouse, Appellant, v City of New York et al., Respondents.
[773 NYS2d 302]

Opinion:
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Braun, J.), entered March 21, 2003, which denied petitioner's application to annul respondents' determination denying petitioner's request to retake a civil service examination, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
No issues of fact exist as to whether petitioner complained about the lighting in the examination room on the day he took the examination, and, even if he did, that the alleged excessive glare caused him a disadvantage (see Matter of Lawson v Levitt, 211 AD2d 587 [1995]). Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.