Case Name: Henry WHITLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1990-06-26
Citations: 792 S.W.2d 49
Docket Number: No. 57412
Parties: Henry WHITLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 792
Pages: 49–49

Head Matter:
Henry WHITLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 57412.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
June 26, 1990.
Mary Anderson, Columbia, for appellant.
William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Christine A. Alsop, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Henry Whitley, appeals the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed appellant's allegations of error, the entire record upon which they are based, and the findings and conclusions of the motion court. We do not find the court's action to be clearly erroneous and find that an extended opinion would have no precedential value. We, therefore, affirm the court's dismissal pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, which sets forth the basis of the court's decision.