Case Name: Sharp et al. v. Pillsbury Flour Mills Company
Court: Appellate Court of Indiana
Jurisdiction: Indiana
Decision Date: 1922-11-16
Citations: 78 Ind. App. 657
Docket Number: No. 11,328
Parties: Sharp et al. v. Pillsbury Flour Mills Company.
Judges: 
Reporter: Indiana Court of Appeals Reports
Volume: 78
Pages: 657–657

Head Matter:
Sharp et al. v. Pillsbury Flour Mills Company.
[No. 11,328.
Filed November 16, 1922.]
Appeal. — Briefs.—Absence of Statement of Evidence. — Questions Presented. — Where appellant’s only assigned error is the overruling of his motion for a new trial, and the grounds for a new trial stated in the motion require a consideration of the evidence, no error is presented where appellant fails to include a statement of the evidence in his brief.
From Miami Circuit Court; Albert Ward, Judge.
Action by the Pillsbury Flour Mills Company against Charles Sharp and Ralph Overman, doing business under the firm name and style of Sharp and Overman. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.
Affirmed.
Tillett & Lawrence, for appellant.
Guy R. York and Ellis E. Sluss, for appellee.

Opinion:
Nichols, P. J.
— Action by appellee against appellants to recover damages for an alleged breach of sale of a written contract for the sale of goods and merchandise. There was a trial by jury and a verdict for appellee, on which judgment was rendered.
The only error assigned is the action of the court in overruling appellants' motion for a new trial, the causes for which motion each pertain to the evidence. No error is presented for the reason that there is no statement of the evidence in appellants' brief.
' Judgment affirmed.