Case Name: Julius TOTH, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. GUARANTEE ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-11-02
Citations: 148 S.W.3d 873
Docket Number: No. ED 83634
Parties: Julius TOTH, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. GUARANTEE ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 148
Pages: 873–873

Head Matter:
Julius TOTH, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. GUARANTEE ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 83634.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Nov. 2, 2004.
Thomas J. Magee, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
John D. Anderson, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Guarantee Electrical Construction Company ("Guarantee") appeals the judgment awarding damages to plaintiff Julius Toth for personal injuries sustained on a job site. Guarantee claims that Toth failed to make a submissible case of negligence, and that the verdict directing instruction was improperly submitted to the jury.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).