Case Name: Jeffrey Scott CLEGG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael D. MURPHY, Dr., Defendant-Appellee, and David M. Hinds, PA; Jamie Reid; Paula Smith, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-09-10
Citations: 74 F. App'x 274
Docket Number: No. 03-6913
Parties: Jeffrey Scott CLEGG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael D. MURPHY, Dr., Defendant-Appellee, and David M. Hinds, PA; Jamie Reid; Paula Smith, Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 74
Pages: 274–274

Head Matter:
Jeffrey Scott CLEGG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael D. MURPHY, Dr., Defendant-Appellee, and David M. Hinds, PA; Jamie Reid; Paula Smith, Defendants.
No. 03-6913.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 28, 2003.
Decided Sept. 10, 2003.
Jeffrey Scott Clegg, Appellant Pro Se. Renee Billings Crawford, Crawford Law Office, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Jeffrey Scott Clegg appeals the district court's order setting aside a default judgment against one of the named defendants and denying Clegg's discovery motions. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Clegg seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny Clegg's "motion for clarification" and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.