Case Name: Jeremiah Williams & Co., Inc., Respondent, v. Lamport & Holt, Ltd., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1928-01-31
Citations: 131 Misc. 514
Docket Number: 
Parties: Jeremiah Williams & Co., Inc., Respondent, v. Lamport & Holt, Ltd., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 131
Pages: 514–514

Head Matter:
Jeremiah Williams & Co., Inc., Respondent, v. Lamport & Holt, Ltd., Appellant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
January 31, 1928.
Slayton & Jackson [(?. Noyes Slaton of counsel], for the appellant.
Harry D. Thirkield, for the respondent.
Revg. 130 Misc. 644.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The issues were submitted to the jury under a charge to which no objection was made or exception taken, and that plaintiff's counsel was entirely satisfied with the charge is further evidenced by the fact that no request was made for additional instructions. There is nothing in the record to indicate that the jiiry did not comprehend the facts or that they overlooked the law as charged by the court, and the verdict seems to be sustained by the evidence.
Order reversed, with costs, motion denied, and verdict reinstated.
All concur; present, Bijur, Delehanty and Crain, JJ.