Case Name: SMART v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1930-03-19
Citations: 27 S.W.2d 813
Docket Number: No. 13160
Parties: SMART v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 27
Pages: 813–813

Head Matter:
SMART v. STATE.
No. 13160.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
March 19, 1930.
Rehearing Granted April 30, 1930.
J. Lee Cearley, of Cisco, for appellant.
A. A. Dawson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
MORROW, P. J.
The offense is burglary; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of three years.
There are no questions of law presented for review save the sufficiency of the evidence. A recital of the evidence is deemed unnecessary. The burglary was proved by the owner of the premises, and a part of the stolen property was found in the possession of the appellant. An accomplice testified, detailing the entire transaction and connecting the appellant with the commission of the offense, and the corroboration is adequate to support the conviction.
The judgment- is affirmed.