Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kalonji Skou EWING, a/k/a Luck, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-09-14
Citations: 657 F. App'x 176
Docket Number: No. 16-6378
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kalonji Skou EWING, a/k/a Luck, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 657
Pages: 176–177

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kalonji Skou EWING, a/k/a Luck, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-6378
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: August 31, 2016
Decided: September 14, 2016
Kalonji Skou Ewing, Appellant Pro Se. Dena Janae King, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kalonji Skou Ewing appeals the district court's order denying his motion to reconsider the district court's denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. Because the district court lacked jurisdiction to consider Ewing's motion for reconsideration, we affirm the denial of relief. See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 234 (4th Cir. 2010) (holding that district court lacks authority to grant motion to reconsider ruling on § 3582(c)(2) motion). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED