Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Mark STILL, Appellant; Mark STILL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1997-03-11
Citations: 941 S.W.2d 715
Docket Number: No. 68497
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Mark STILL, Appellant. Mark STILL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 941
Pages: 715–715

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Mark STILL, Appellant. Mark STILL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 68497.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
March 11, 1997.
Douglas R. Hoff, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Fernando Bermudez, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Mark Still, appeals the judgment of conviction for murder in the first degree, RSMo § 565.020 (1994), and armed criminal action, RSMo § 571.015 (1994), entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis after a jury trial. Appellant also appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment of conviction is supported by sufficient evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. We further find the judgment denying the Rule 29.15 motion is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).