Case Name: ST. ANDREWS CORPORATION, a Florida Corporation, Appellant, v. Richard A. NEUBAUER and Winnie F. Neubauer, his wife, Larry Eaton, Robert N. Jones, William F. Andrews, Charles E. Lewis and Elizabeth C. Lewis, his wife, Andrew Palguta and Edith S. Palguta, his wife, and Arthur Montgomery, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1981-05-20
Citations: 398 So. 2d 990
Docket Number: No. 80-394
Parties: ST. ANDREWS CORPORATION, a Florida Corporation, Appellant, v. Richard A. NEUBAUER and Winnie F. Neubauer, his wife, Larry Eaton, Robert N. Jones, William F. Andrews, Charles E. Lewis and Elizabeth C. Lewis, his wife, Andrew Palguta and Edith S. Palguta, his wife, and Arthur Montgomery, Appellees.
Judges: DOWNEY and HURLEY, JJ., and UP-CHURCH, JOHN J., IV, Associate Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 398
Pages: 990–991

Head Matter:
ST. ANDREWS CORPORATION, a Florida Corporation, Appellant, v. Richard A. NEUBAUER and Winnie F. Neubauer, his wife, Larry Eaton, Robert N. Jones, William F. Andrews, Charles E. Lewis and Elizabeth C. Lewis, his wife, Andrew Palguta and Edith S. Palguta, his wife, and Arthur Montgomery, Appellees.
No. 80-394.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
May 20, 1981.
L. Louis Mrachek, Gunster, Yoakley, Criser & Stewart, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Margaret L. Cooper, Jones & Foster, West Palm Beach, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The trial court in an extensive and detailed order found that a permanent easement exists, in favor of appellees, over the south five feet of appellant's property. The court also determined that the proof was insufficient to establish an easement by prescription over the north ten feet of appellant's property. Our review of the record leads us to conclude that both findings are supported by substantial competent evidence and accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.
DOWNEY and HURLEY, JJ., and UP-CHURCH, JOHN J., IV, Associate Judge, concur.