Case Name: The State ex rel. Nash, Appellant, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellees
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2004-01-14
Citations: 101 Ohio St. 3d 61
Docket Number: No. 2003-0578
Parties: The State ex rel. Nash, Appellant, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellees.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 101
Pages: 61–61

Head Matter:
The State ex rel. Nash, Appellant, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellees.
[Cite as State ex rel. Nash v. Indus. Comm., 101 Ohio St.3d 61, 2004-Ohio-2.]
(No. 2003-0578
Submitted December 1, 2003
Decided January 14, 2004.)
M. Blake Stone, L.P.A., and M. Blake Stone, for appellant.
Jim Petro, Attorney General, and Keith D. Blosser, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission.
Critehfield, Critchfield & Johnston, Ltd., and Susan E. Baker, for appellee Newell Rubbermaid, Inc.

Opinion:
{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.
Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor and O'Donnell, JJ., concur.