Case Name: PAUL BENCSKO, RESPONDENT, v. CAESAR A. CANNARA, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1931-02-02
Citations: 107 N.J.L. 516
Docket Number: 
Parties: PAUL BENCSKO, RESPONDENT, v. CAESAR A. CANNARA, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 107
Pages: 516–517

Head Matter:
PAUL BENCSKO, RESPONDENT, v. CAESAR A. CANNARA, APPELLANT.
Submitted October 31, 1930
Decided February 2, 1931.
For the respondent, John W. Palmer.
For the appellant, Stein, McGlynn & Hannoch.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Trehchard, Parker, Campbell, Lloyd, Bodijste, Daly, Dohges, Yah Buskibk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.