Case Name: Thomas James TAYLOR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1984-10-30
Citations: 458 So. 2d 1150
Docket Number: No. 83-2988
Parties: Thomas James TAYLOR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before HENDRY, BASKIN and JOR-GENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 458
Pages: 1150–1150

Head Matter:
Thomas James TAYLOR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 83-2988.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 30, 1984.
Rehearing Denied Dec. 17, 1984.
Chaykin, Karlan & Jacobs and Sharon Jacobs, Coral Gables, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Charles M. Fahlbusch, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before HENDRY, BASKIN and JOR-GENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We hold that under the totality of the circumstances the identification was reliable, and there was no substantial likelihood of misidentification, even though the confrontation procedure was suggestive. We therefore affirm the judgment of conviction. Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98, 97 S.Ct. 2243, 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977); Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188, 93 S.Ct. 375, 34 L.Ed.2d 401 (1972); Grant v. State, 390 So.2d 341 (Fla.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 913, 101 S.Ct. 1987, 68 L.Ed.2d 303 (1981); Lecoin v. State, 418 So.2d 336 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).
Affirmed.