Case Name: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Scuro
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1988-05-04
Citations: 36 Ohio St. 3d 205
Docket Number: D.D. No. 87-24
Parties: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Scuro.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 36
Pages: 205–206

Head Matter:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Scuro.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Scuro (1988), 36 Ohio St. 3d 205.]
(D.D. No. 87-24
Decided May 4, 1988.)
J. Warren Bettis, disciplinary counsel, and Mark H. Aultman, for relator.
Charles W. Kettlewell, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This court adopts the factual findings of the board. We conclude, however, that the findings support a more severe sanction than recommended. Accordingly, respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for six months for having violated DR 3-101(B). Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.
H. Brown, J., dissents.