Case Name: Frederick Mead, Resp't, v. New York El. R. Co., et al., App'lts
Court: New York Superior Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1895-05-06
Citations: 66 N.Y. St. Rep. 871
Docket Number: 
Parties: Frederick Mead, Resp’t, v. New York El. R. Co., et al., App’lts.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 66
Pages: 871–871

Head Matter:
Frederick Mead, Resp’t, v. New York El. R. Co., et al., App’lts.
N. Y. Supr. Ct.,
May 6, 1895.
Davis & Sapallo (Julien T. Davies, Brainard Tolles and J. C. Bushby, of counsel), for app’lts; Exarts, Choate & Beaman (Joseph H. Choate, W. V. Rowe and T. T. Sherman, of counsel), for resp’t.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The awards herein are supported by a fair preponderance of evidence. The learned trial judge seems to have followed correct principles of law in the trial and determination of the issues raised. We have examined the case with care, and find no substantial reason for disturbing the decision of the court below. The judgment appealed from is affirmed, with costs.