Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rogelio LOERA-VASQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-12-27
Citations: 213 F. App'x 615
Docket Number: No. 05-10604
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rogelio LOERA-VASQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 213
Pages: 615–615

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rogelio LOERA-VASQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-10604.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 21, 2006.
Filed Dec. 27, 2006.
Daniel Jon Santander, AUSA, USTUOffice of the U.S. Attorney, Evo A. Deconcini, U.S. Courthouse, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Ramiro S. Flores, Esq., Law Offices of Ramiro S. Flores, Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Rogelio Loera-Vasquez, Salters, SC, pro se.
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Rogelio Loera-Vasquez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 71-month sentence for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), with a sentence enhancement pursuant to § 1326(b).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Loera-Vasquez has filed a brief stating that he finds no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
We dismiss in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2000) (stating that an appeal waiver is valid when entered into knowingly and voluntarily).
Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the appeal is DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.