Case Name: Wilbur M. LAULO and, Mary S. Laulo Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Kevin CHEEK and Leslie Cheek, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-08-08
Citations: 24 S.W.3d 786
Docket Number: No. ED 76770
Parties: Wilbur M. LAULO and, Mary S. Laulo Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Kevin CHEEK and Leslie Cheek, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before: GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J., PAUL J. SIMON, J., JAMES R. DOWD, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 24
Pages: 786–787

Head Matter:
Wilbur M. LAULO and, Mary S. Laulo Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Kevin CHEEK and Leslie Cheek, Defendant/Respondent.
No. ED 76770.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Aug. 8, 2000.
Mary S. Laulo, Imperial, for appellant.
Randall D. Sherman, Wegmann, Gasa-way, Stewart, Schneider, Dieffenbach, Tes-reau & Sherman, P.C., Hillsboro, for respondent.
Before: GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J., PAUL J. SIMON, J., JAMES R. DOWD, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from judgment denying Wilbur and Mary Laulo's request for injunctive relief. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the par ties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).