Case Name: WALTER M. BROWN, PLAINTIFF, v. MORRISEY & WALKER, INCORPORATED, DEFENDANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1929-04-19
Citations: 7 N.J. Misc. 414
Docket Number: 
Parties: WALTER M. BROWN, PLAINTIFF, v. MORRISEY & WALKER, INCORPORATED, DEFENDANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 7
Pages: 414–414

Head Matter:
WALTER M. BROWN, PLAINTIFF, v. MORRISEY & WALKER, INCORPORATED, DEFENDANT.
Submitted January term, 1929
Decided April 19, 1929.
Before Justices Black, Campbell and Case.
Eor the rule, Quinn, Parsons & Doremus.
Contra, Ward Kremer.

Opinion:
Pee Cueiam.
This suit was brought to recover one thousand dollars ($1,000), as a bonus or prize for the sale of real estate.' The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant obtained a rule to show cause and writes down nine.reasons for a new trial. Our reading of the testimony sent up with the rule to show cause and a consideration of the reasons filed thereunder lead us to the conclusion that the rule to show cause should be discharged. The rule is therefore discharged.