Case Name: ENGINEER CO. v. HERRING-HALL-MARVIN CO.
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1913-10-24
Citations: 143 N.Y.S. 1116
Docket Number: 
Parties: ENGINEER CO. v. HERRING-HALL-MARVIN CO.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 143
Pages: 1116–1116

Head Matter:
ENGINEER CO. v. HERRING-HALL-MARVIN CO.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
October 24, 1913.)
Appeal from Trial Term, New York County. Action by the Engineer Company against the Herring-Hall-Marvin Company. From a judgment for pIainti~, and denial of new trial, defendant appeals. Affirmed. Harry W. Forbes, of New York City, for appellant. .Tames W. Monk, of New York City, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CITRIAM.
This court on the former appeal (154 App. Div. 123, 138 N. Y. Supp. 881) held that there was a question for the jury. The case now having been submitted to the jury, who have found a verdict for the plainti~, which is supported by the evidence, the judgment is therefore affirmed. .Tudgment and order affirmed, with costs.