Case Name: Michael J. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harley G. LAPPIN; Kim White; B.G. Compton; Jerry Jones; Officer Strickland; Officer Story; G. Cooper; Officer Giddins; Officer Mollica; Jessica Jones; Officer Torres; Officer Bourque; C/O Flanary; Officer Johnson; Officer Eldridge; Officer Marques; Harrell Watts, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-04-29
Citations: 126 F. App'x 641
Docket Number: No. 04-7813
Parties: Michael J. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harley G. LAPPIN; Kim White; B.G. Compton; Jerry Jones; Officer Strickland; Officer Story; G. Cooper; Officer Giddins; Officer Mollica; Jessica Jones; Officer Torres; Officer Bourque; C/O Flanary; Officer Johnson; Officer Eldridge; Officer Marques; Harrell Watts, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 126
Pages: 641–641

Head Matter:
Michael J. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harley G. LAPPIN; Kim White; B.G. Compton; Jerry Jones; Officer Strickland; Officer Story; G. Cooper; Officer Giddins; Officer Mollica; Jessica Jones; Officer Torres; Officer Bourque; C/O Flanary; Officer Johnson; Officer Eldridge; Officer Marques; Harrell Watts, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 04-7813.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 28, 2005.
Decided April 29, 2005.
Michael J. Williams, Appellant pro se.
Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Michael J. Williams appeals the district court's order denying relief on his Bivens complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Williams v. Lappin, No. CA-04-625-7 (W.D.Va. filed Oct. 26, 2004; entered Oct. 27, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971).