Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Mark Davis, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2001-04-16
Citations: 282 A.D.2d 617
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Mark Davis, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 282
Pages: 617–618

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Mark Davis, Appellant.
[722 NYS2d 919]

Opinion:
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Ort, J.), rendered December 9, 1997, convicting him of bur glary in the third degree, reckless endangerment in the second degree, and violations of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 509 (1) and § 1180 (d), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.
Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered.
At a joint trial of the defendant and his codefendant, Maurice McCorkle (see, People v McCorkle, 278 AD2d 249), the trial court permitted the prosecutor to exercise a peremptory challenge to exclude a prospective juror because he was of Haitian ancestry. Since the People have correctly conceded that this constituted reversible error (see, People v McCorkle, supra), a new trial is ordered.
The defendant's challenge to the suppression ruling is without merit, and his argument regarding the partial verdict is academic (see, People v McCorkle, supra). Bracken, P. J., O'Brien, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.