Case Name: Carol Jagiello, Individually and as Guardian ad Litem of Natalie Jagiello, an Infant, et al., Respondents, v. Joseph Jagiello et al., Defendants, and Edwin T. Jagiello et al., Appellants; John Laskoski, Respondent, v. Waldo S. De Mers, Appellant; The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Albert Cohen, Appellant; The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. W. Roger Pratt, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1962-05-17
Citations: 16 A.D.2d 880
Docket Number: 
Parties: (A) Carol Jagiello, Individually and as Guardian ad Litem of Natalie Jagiello, an Infant, et al., Respondents, v. Joseph Jagiello et al., Defendants, and Edwin T. Jagiello et al., Appellants. (B) John Laskoski, Respondent, v. Waldo S. De Mers, Appellant. (C) The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Albert Cohen, Appellant. (D) The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. W. Roger Pratt, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 16
Pages: 880–880

Head Matter:
(A) Carol Jagiello, Individually and as Guardian ad Litem of Natalie Jagiello, an Infant, et al., Respondents, v. Joseph Jagiello et al., Defendants, and Edwin T. Jagiello et al., Appellants. (B) John Laskoski, Respondent, v. Waldo S. De Mers, Appellant. (C) The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Albert Cohen, Appellant. (D) The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. W. Roger Pratt, Respondent.

Opinion:
[In each case] Order of dismissal for failure to prosecute entered pursuant to rule X of the Rules of the Appellate Division, Fourth Department.