Case Name: Ben Castleman v. The State
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1898-01-26
Citations: 39 Tex. Crim. 1
Docket Number: No. 1480
Parties: Ben Castleman v. The State.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Criminal Reports
Volume: 39
Pages: 1–3

Head Matter:
DALLAS TERM, 1898
Ben Castleman v. The State.
No. 1480.
Decided January 26, 1898.
Motion for Rehearing Decided March 2, 1898.
1. Statement of Pacts—Practice on Appeal.
A statement of facts which has not been approved by the trial judge will not be considered on appeal.
2. Supplemental Statement of Pacts—Piled After Adjournment.
Where the original record on appeal contained a certified statement of facts filed in term time in the court below, but which was not approved by the judge, a supplemental transcript showing a certified statement of facts approved by the judge, but filed after the term of court below had adjourned, will not be considered; there being no previous order granting ten days within which to file said statement after adjournment.
Appeal from the County Court of Johnson. Tried below before Hon. F. E. Adams, County Judge.
Appeal from a conviction for a violation of local option; penalty, a fine of $50 and thirty days imprisonment in the county jail.
No statement necessary.
Plummer & Green, for appellant.
Mann Trice, Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

Opinion:
DAVIDSON, Judge.
Appellant was charged by information with a violation of the local option law. He was convicted, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $50 and imprisonment in the county jail for a term of thirty days. A motion was made to quash the affidavit and information. We have examined the grounds of the motion, and find they are not sustained by the record. The affidavit and information are in good form, and properly set out the offense sought to be charged. The statement of facts can not be considered, because not approved by the trial judge. The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed. .