Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Calletano GALARZA-MORALES, Also Known as Tommy Salgado, Also Known as Callentano Morales-Galarza, Also Known as Tommy Calletano, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-09-20
Citations: 669 F. App'x 193
Docket Number: No. 16-10059 Summary Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Calletano GALARZA-MORALES, Also Known as Tommy Salgado, Also Known as Callentano Morales-Galarza, Also Known as Tommy Calletano, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before JOLLY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 669
Pages: 193–193

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Calletano GALARZA-MORALES, Also Known as Tommy Salgado, Also Known as Callentano Morales-Galarza, Also Known as Tommy Calletano, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-10059 Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed: 09/20/2016
James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Calletano Galarza-Morales, Pro Se.
Before JOLLY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Calletano Galarza-Morales has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Galarza-Morales has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Galarza-Morales's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, so we decline to consider it, but without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
We have reviewed counsel's brief, relevant portions of the record reflected therein, and Galarza-Morales's response. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cíe. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.