Case Name: Manuel J. CRIOLLO, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2011-10-31
Citations: 73 So. 3d 339
Docket Number: No. 1D11-2182
Parties: Manuel J. CRIOLLO, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering, Appellee.
Judges: DAVIS, VAN NORTWICK, and ROWE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 73
Pages: 339–339

Head Matter:
Manuel J. CRIOLLO, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering, Appellee.
No. 1D11-2182.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Oct. 31, 2011.
John Strohsahl and Bradford J. Beilly of Bradford J. Beilly, P.A., Ft. Lauderdale, for Petitioner.
Garnett W. Chisenhall, Chief Appellate Counsel, Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of appellee's confession of error, the final order is reversed and the cause is remanded with directions to enter a new order which either accepts the penalty recommendation of the Administrative Law Judge or reimposes the increased penalty stating with particularity the reasons for increasing the penalty as required by section 120.57(1)(l), Florida Statutes (2010). See Shah v. Dep't of Health, 804 So.2d 615 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).
DAVIS, VAN NORTWICK, and ROWE, JJ., concur.