Case Name: Robert MAHONY, as father and personal representative of Eve Mahony, in his own behalf and as next of kin and for the Use and Benefit of Eve Mahony's mother, Barbara Mahony, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1993-05-24
Citations: 993 F.2d 211
Docket Number: No. 90-9052
Parties: Robert MAHONY, as father and personal representative of Eve Mahony, in his own behalf and as next of kin and for the Use and Benefit of Eve Mahony’s mother, Barbara Mahony, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before TJOPLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges, and DYER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 993
Pages: 211–211

Head Matter:
Robert MAHONY, as father and personal representative of Eve Mahony, in his own behalf and as next of kin and for the Use and Benefit of Eve Mahony’s mother, Barbara Mahony, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 90-9052.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
May 24, 1993.
Allison Ulin Lynch, Paty Rymer & Ulin, Pamela Rymer O’Dwyer, Chattanooga, TN, for plaintiffs-appellants.
Jack Harrell Senterfitt, Alston & Bird, Gerald L. Mize, Jr., James W. Hagan, Atlanta, GA, for defendant-appellee.
Before TJOPLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges, and DYER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
In this case, plaintiffs appeal an adverse judgment in their Georgia wrongful death action arising from a railroad crossing accident. A panel of this court, applying our decision in Eastenvood v. CSX Transportation, Inc., 933 F.2d 1548 (11th Cir.1991), remanded the case. 966 F.2d 644. A majority of the active judges in regular active service ordered that the appeal be reheard by the court of appeals en bane. This order vacated the panel opinion. Mahony v. CSX Transp., Inc., 980 F.2d 1379 (11th Cir.1992). Subsequently, the Supreme Court of the United States affirmed our decision in Easterwood. See CSX Transp., Inc. v. Easterwood, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1732, 123 L.Ed.2d 387 (1993).
We now reinstate the panel opinion in its entirety.
IT IS SO ORDERED.