Case Name: Christopher Taylor, Appellant, v. Village of Ilion, Respondent and Third-Party Plaintiff. Sporting Goods Properties, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1996-09-27
Citations: 231 A.D.2d 923
Docket Number: 
Parties: Christopher Taylor, Appellant, v Village of Ilion, Respondent and Third-Party Plaintiff. Sporting Goods Properties, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 231
Pages: 923–923

Head Matter:
Christopher Taylor, Appellant, v Village of Ilion, Respondent and Third-Party Plaintiff. Sporting Goods Properties, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
[648 NYS2d 362]

Opinion:
Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed with costs to plaintiff in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in granting defendant's motion for leave to serve a second amended answer. It is well settled that, absent surprise or prejudice, leave to amend pleadings is to be "freely given" (CPLR 3025 [b]) and that the determination whether to grant leave to amend is a matter addressed in the first instance to the discretion of the trial court {see, Edenwald Contr. Co. v City of New York, 60 NY2d 957, 959; Faracy v McGraw Edison Corp., 229 AD2d 463). Here, plaintiff demonstrated that he would be significantly prejudiced by defendant's delayed assertion of the Statute of Limitations as an affirmative defense {cf, Wirhowski v Hudson Armored Car & Courier Serv., 221 AD2d 523; see generally, Siegel, Practice Commentaries, McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR C3025:5, at 356).
In all other respects, the order is affirmed. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Herkimer County, Parker, J.—Amend Pleading.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Wesley, Davis and Boehm, JJ.