Case Name: Shelton DIXON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-09-04
Citations: 678 So. 2d 530
Docket Number: No. 96-1207
Parties: Shelton DIXON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ALLEN, WEBSTER and MICKLE, JJ., concur,
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 678
Pages: 530–530

Head Matter:
Shelton DIXON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 96-1207.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Sept. 4, 1996.
Appellant pro se.
No appearance for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We construe the motion filed by appellant in the trial court as one seeking relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. However, the motion was not properly verified under oath. Gorham v. State, 494 So.2d 211 (Fla.1986); Scott v. State, 464 So.2d 1171 (Fla.1985); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.987. Accordingly, the motion was legally insufficient. Therefore, the order denying the motion is affirmed,
AFFIRMED
ALLEN, WEBSTER and MICKLE, JJ., concur,