Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Miguel LAINEZ-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-07-24
Citations: 694 F. App'x 262
Docket Number: No. 16-40153 Summary Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Miguel LAINEZ-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 694
Pages: 262–262

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Miguel LAINEZ-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant
No. 16-40153 Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed July 24, 2017
Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Jose Miguel Lainez-Hernandez, Pro Se
Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Miguel Lainez-Hernan-dez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lainez-Hernandez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.