Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stuart C. COLE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-06-03
Citations: 36 F. App'x 102
Docket Number: No. 02-6465
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stuart C. COLE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 36
Pages: 102–103

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stuart C. COLE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-6465.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 17, 2002.
Decided June 3, 2002.
Stuart C. Cole, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lane Whisler, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Stuart C. Cole appeals the district court's order denying his motion for bond pending a decision on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Cole, Nos. CR-97-87; CA-99-424-3-V (W-D.N.C. Mar. 1, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.