Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Demecio ONTIVEROS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-06-12
Citations: 185 F. App'x 236
Docket Number: No. 05-7792
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Demecio ONTIVEROS, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 185
Pages: 236–237

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Demecio ONTIVEROS, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 05-7792.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 26, 2006.
Decided: June 12, 2006.
Robert Allen Ratliff, Robert A. Ratliff, PC, Mobile, Alabama, for Appellant. Steve R. Matheny, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Demecio Ontiveros appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his motion to modify his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000) and his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Ontiveros's § 3582 motion and motion to reconsider on the basis that § 3582(c)(2) does not provide for a remedy where, as here, the Sentencing Commission has not reduced the applicable guidelines range. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.