Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesus Omar RIVERA-CUELLAR, also known as Jesus Oman Rivera, also known as Jesus Omar Rivera, also known as Jesus Omar Rivera Cuellar, also known as Jesus Rivera, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-02-17
Citations: 633 F. App'x 623
Docket Number: No. 15-20050
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesus Omar RIVERA-CUELLAR, also known as Jesus Oman Rivera, also known as Jesus Omar Rivera, also known as Jesus Omar Rivera Cuellar, also known as Jesus Rivera, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before DAVIS, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 633
Pages: 623–624

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesus Omar RIVERA-CUELLAR, also known as Jesus Oman Rivera, also known as Jesus Omar Rivera, also known as Jesus Omar Rivera Cuellar, also known as Jesus Rivera, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-20050
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Feb. 17, 2016.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Lourdes Rodriguez, Houston, TX, for Defendanb-Appellant.
Before DAVIS, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Jesus Omar Rivera-Cuellar has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Rivera-Cuellar has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.