Case Name: Schwer, Admx., Appellee, v. The New York, Chicago & St. Louis Rd. Co., Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1951-07-11
Citations: 156 Ohio St. 115
Docket Number: No. 32267
Parties: Schwer, Admx., Appellee, v. The New York, Chicago & St. Louis Rd. Co., Appellant.
Judges: Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Stewart, Tart, Matthias, and Hart, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, New Service
Volume: 156
Pages: 115–116

Head Matter:
Schwer, Admx., Appellee, v. The New York, Chicago & St. Louis Rd. Co., Appellant.
(No. 32267
Decided July 11, 1951.)
Messrs. Harrison, Thomas, Spangenberg & Hull, Mr. Norman W. Shibley, and Mr. S, L. Heckman, for appellee.
Messrs. Miller & Hornbeck, Mr. W. R. Price, and Mr. John H. Ritter, for appellant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The question presented is whether the action of the trial court in granting a new trial amounted to an abuse of discretion. Since the journal entry of the trial court granting the new trial does not disclose on what ground or grounds the motion was allowed, and an examination of the record fails to disclose an abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Stewart, Tart, Matthias, and Hart, JJ., concur.
Middleton, J., not participating.