Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Appellant, v. TIMOTHY SUNNAFRANK, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1996-08-21
Citations: 142 Or. App. 590
Docket Number: 93CR2544FE; CA A88218
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Appellant, v. TIMOTHY SUNNAFRANK, Respondent.
Judges: Before Riggs, Presiding Judge, and Landau and Haselton, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 142
Pages: 590–591

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted May 30,
reversed and remanded August 21, 1996
STATE OF OREGON, Appellant, v. TIMOTHY SUNNAFRANK, Respondent.
(93CR2544FE; CA A88218)
921 P2d 428
Robert M. Atkinson, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.
David E. Groom, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender.
Before Riggs, Presiding Judge, and Landau and Haselton, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
The state appeals from the trial court's dismissal of this matter as being barred by the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution and by Article I, section 12, of the Oregon Constitution. The state argues, and defendant concedes, that United States v. Ursery, _ US _, 116 S Ct 762, 133 L Ed 2d 707 (1996), compels reversal of the trial court's disposition, which was based solely on pre-Ursery federal authority. We agree. See, e.g., Umatilla County v. $18,005 in U.S. Currency, 142 Or App 513, 921 P2d 426 (1996); State v. Vettrus, 142 Or App 359, 922 P2d 673 (1996).
Reversed and remanded.