Case Name: Steven FORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-01-29
Citations: 591 So. 2d 1164
Docket Number: No. 91-2809
Parties: Steven FORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: LETTS, DELL and GARRETT, JJ., concur
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 591
Pages: 1164–1165

Head Matter:
Steven FORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 91-2809.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jan. 29, 1992.
Steven Ford, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Jacqueline Barakat, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant contends the trial court erred when it summarily denied his motion for post-conviction relief. The trial court stated in its order that it had attached "that portion of the files and records which con clusively show that [appellant] is entitled to no relief." The state concedes that the order in the record on appeal does not contain a copy of any attachments.
4 , , , . Accordingly, we reverse and remand this cause to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing or for an attachment of those portions of the record that refute appellant's claim of improper calculation of points for victim injury,
REVERSED and REMANDED,
LETTS, DELL and GARRETT, JJ., concur