Case Name: ED. ELMS v. STATE
Court: Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1912-01-16
Citations: 6 Okla. Crim. 716
Docket Number: No. A-1170
Parties: ED. ELMS v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: Oklahoma Criminal Reports
Volume: 6
Pages: 716–716

Head Matter:
ED. ELMS v. STATE.
No. A-1170.
Opinion Filed January 16, 1912.
Appeal from Caddo County Court; C. Ross Hume, Judge.
Ed. Elms was convicted of violating the prohibitory law,, and appeals.
Appeal dismissed.
Bristow & McFadyen, for plaintiff in error.
Smith C. Matson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State..

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Caddo county at the January, 1911, term, on a charge of having the possession of intoxicating liquor with the unlawful intent to sell the same, and his punishment fixed at a fine of two hundred fifty dollars and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of ninety days. Following the rule laid down in the Stumpf case, the Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. The motion is well taken and is sustained. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.