Case Name: Schaible, Appellee, v. City of Cincinnati, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1952-05-14
Citations: 157 Ohio St. 512
Docket Number: No. 32866
Parties: Schaible, Appellee, v. City of Cincinnati, Appellant.
Judges: Weygandt, O. J., Zimmerman, Stewart, Middleton, Taft, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, New Service
Volume: 157
Pages: 512–514

Head Matter:
Schaible, Appellee, v. City of Cincinnati, Appellant.
(No. 32866
Decided May 14, 1952.)
Mr. John J. Rivers, for appellee.
Mr. Henry M. Bruestle, city solicitor, Mr. J. B. Grause, Jr., and Mr. Maurice W. Jacobs, for appellant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Since the journal entry of the trial court setting aside the verdict and judgment and granting a new trial does not disclose the ground or grounds for such order, and an examination of the record fails to disclose an abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court in making the order, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed. See Schwer, Admx., v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Rd. Co., 156 Ohio St., 115, 100 N. E. (2d), 197, and Green v. Acacia Mutual Life Ins. Co., 156 Ohio St., 1, 100 N. E. (2d), 211.
Judgment affirmed.
Weygandt, O. J., Zimmerman, Stewart, Middleton, Taft, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.