Case Name: Chaubert FRANCOIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2013-08-09
Citations: 118 So. 3d 960
Docket Number: No. 5D12-2167
Parties: Chaubert FRANCOIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: GRIFFIN and LAWSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 118
Pages: 960–960

Head Matter:
Chaubert FRANCOIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D12-2167.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Aug. 9, 2013.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Kevin R. Holtz, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Lori N. Hagan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Ap-pellee.

Opinion:
COHEN, J.
Chaubert Francois appeals from the judgment and sentence entered after a jury found him guilty of burglary of a dwelling. While the trial court erred in failing to conduct a Richardson hearing, under the facts of this case-where Francois and his codefendant were observed by law enforcement kicking in the front door of the dwelling and were apprehended upon fleeing from the home-the error was harmless. See State v. Schopp, 653 So.2d 1016, 1020 (Fla.1995). Accordingly, we affirm.
AFFIRMED.
GRIFFIN and LAWSON, JJ., concur.
. Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d 771 (Fla.1971).
. We do not condone the actions of the assistant state attorney, who, two days before trial, became aware of the existence of discoverable material possessed by an agency other than that which effectuated the arrest in the case, and yet failed to disclose that information to the defense. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.220(b).