Case Name: Rudolph Kroll, appellant, v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company, appellee
Court: Nebraska Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Nebraska
Decision Date: 1915-05-01
Citations: 98 Neb. 324
Docket Number: No. 18100
Parties: Rudolph Kroll, appellant, v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company, appellee.
Judges: Fawcett and Hamer, JJ., not sitting.
Reporter: Nebraska Reports
Volume: 98
Pages: 324–325

Head Matter:
Rudolph Kroll, appellant, v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company, appellee.
Filed May 1, 1915.
No. 18100.
Courts: Jurisdiction: Injuries to Real- Property. As a general rule, an action for injuries to real property situated in another state cannot be maintained in this state. Kroll v. Chicago, B. t& Q. R. Co., ante, p. 322, followed.
Appeal from the district court for Holt county: R. R. Dickson, Judge.
Affirmed.
M. F. Harrington, for appellant.
Byron Clark, Jesse L. Root, L. C. Chapman and J. W. Weingarten, contra.

Opinion:
Rose, J.
Plaintiff brought this action in the district court for Holt county to recover $3,331 for injuries to real estate and personal property situated in Lawrence county, South Dakota. Defendant demurred to the petition on the ground, among others, that the court had no jurisdiction of the subject matter of the suit. The demurrer was sustained. Plaintiff refused to plead further and elected to stand upon his petition. A dismissal of the action followed, and plaintiff has appealed.
The decision is controlled by the case of Kroll v. Chicago, B.& Q. R. Co., ante, p. 322. For the reasons therein stated, the judgment is
Affirmed.
Fawcett and Hamer, JJ., not sitting.