Case Name: Columbus Bar Association v. Baer
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1992-06-17
Citations: 64 Ohio St. 3d 32
Docket Number: No. 91-2502
Parties: Columbus Bar Association v. Baer.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and Resnick, JJ., concur. H. Brown, J., dissents.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 64
Pages: 32–35

Head Matter:
Columbus Bar Association v. Baer.
[Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Baer (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 32.]
(No. 91-2502
Submitted April 7, 1992
Decided June 17, 1992.)
David S. Bloomfield, Gus Robbins-Penniman and Bruce A. Campbell, for relator.
Charles W. Kettlewell and Mark H. Aultman, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We agree with the board's findings and recommendation. Accordingly, we order that respondent be suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of six months. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and Resnick, JJ., concur. H. Brown, J., dissents.
Herbert R. Brown, J., dissenting. I believe that a public reprimand is the appropriate sanction.