Case Name: Henry Nolasco, Plaintiff, v. Soho Plaza Corp. et al., Defendants; Soho Plaza Corp. et al., Third-Party Appellants, v. Diamond Era Construction, Inc., Third-Party Defendant, and Jason Birnbaum et al., Third-Party Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2017-02-09
Citations: 28 N.Y.3d 1156
Docket Number: 
Parties: Henry Nolasco, Plaintiff, v Soho Plaza Corp. et al., Defendants. Soho Plaza Corp. et al., Third-Party Appellants, v Diamond Era Construction, Inc., Third-Party Defendant, and Jason Birnbaum et al., Third-Party Respondents.
Judges: Judge Wilson taking no part.
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 28
Pages: 1156–1156

Head Matter:
Henry Nolasco, Plaintiff, v Soho Plaza Corp. et al., Defendants. Soho Plaza Corp. et al., Third-Party Appellants, v Diamond Era Construction, Inc., Third-Party Defendant, and Jason Birnbaum et al., Third-Party Respondents.
Submitted December 5, 2016;
decided February 9, 2017

Opinion:
Reported below, 129 AD3d 924.
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Judge Wilson taking no part.