Case Name: GLENDALE LUMBER COMPANY, Appellant, v. BEEKMAN LUMBER COMPANY, Respondent
Court: St. Louis Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1911-11-07
Citations: 160 Mo. App. 623
Docket Number: 
Parties: GLENDALE LUMBER COMPANY, Appellant, v. BEEKMAN LUMBER COMPANY, Respondent.
Judges: All concur.
Reporter: Missouri Appeal Reports
Volume: 160
Pages: 623–624

Head Matter:
GLENDALE LUMBER COMPANY, Appellant, v. BEEKMAN LUMBER COMPANY, Respondent.
St. Louis Court of Appeals,
November 7, 1911.
The opinion of the Springfield Court of Appeals in this case (152 Mo. App. 386) is adopted as the opinion of the court.
Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — fio». Geo. fi. Williams, Judge.
Reversed and remanded.
Hattie Greensf elder for appellant.
W. fi. (p Davis Biggs for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM. —
From a judgment of the circuit court of the city of St. Louis, on a demurrer to plain tiff's petition, plaintiff, standing on its demurrer, brought the ease to this court on appeal. Under an Act of the General Assembly, approved June 12, 1909 (Laws 1909, p. 396, now section 3939, R. S. 1909), the cause was transferred to the Springfield Court of Appeals, there heard, and in an opinion rendered by Judge Gray, the judgment of the circuit court was reversed and the cause remanded. Subsequently, in consequence of a decision of the Supreme Court in the case of State ex rel. St. Louis Dressed Beef & Provision Co. v. Nixon et al., 232 Mo. 496, 134 S. W. 538, the case was sent back to this court and has been submitted to us by counsel for the respective parties.
We have read the statement of facts and opinion of Judge Gray, as reported under the title of Glendale Lumber Company v. Beekman Lumber Company, 152 Mo. App. 386, 133 S. W. 384, and accept them as correct statements of the facts and of the law. Accordingly, the judgment of the circuit court of the city of St. Louis in this case is reversed and the cause remanded.
All concur.