Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Donald KIRKLAND, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-03-30
Citations: 124 F. App'x 209
Docket Number: No. 04-7868
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Donald KIRKLAND, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 124
Pages: 209–209

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Donald KIRKLAND, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 04-7868.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 24, 2005.
Decided: March 30, 2005.
Donald Kirkland, Appellant pro se.
Andrea L. Smith, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland; John Vincent Geise, Office of the United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Donald Kirkland seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.
When the United States or its officer or agency is a party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty days after the entry of the district court's final judgment or order, Fed. RApp. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (I960)).
The district court's order was entered on the docket on May 30,1996. The notice of appeal was filed on November 5, 2004. Because Kirkland failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED