Case Name: John Purnell Breeding v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Court: Supreme Court of Virginia
Jurisdiction: Virginia
Decision Date: 1972-11-27
Citations: 213 Va. 344
Docket Number: Record No. 8041
Parties: John Purnell Breeding v. Commonwealth of Virginia.
Judges: 
Reporter: Virginia Reports
Volume: 213
Pages: 344–345

Head Matter:
Richmond
John Purnell Breeding v. Commonwealth of Virginia.
November 27, 1972.
Record No. 8041.
Present, Snead, C.J., Carrico, Harrison, Cochran, Harman and Poff, JJ.
James M. Pickrell; Albert L. Fary, Jr. (Kellam, Pickrell and Lawler, on brief), for plaintiff in error.
Gilbert W. Haith, Assistant Attorney General (Andrew P. Miller, Attorney General, on brief), for defendant in error.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Defendant, John Purnell Breeding, was charged in two indictments with exposing his genital parts "with lascivious intent" to two children under the age of fourteen years, in violation of § 18.1-214, Code of 1950, as amended. He was tried by the court without a jury and sentenced to three years in the State Penitentiary on each indictment, with the sentences to run concurrently. We granted writs of error to the judgments.
The evidence shows that on the afternoon of June 24, 1970, two girls, 8 and 10 years old, respectively, were playing on Arbutus Circle in the City of Chesapeake. A car driven by the defendant stopped and he asked them the way to Daniel's Pharmacy. When the girls approched the car they noticed that defendant's trousers were unbuckled and unzipped, and they saw what they referred to as his "privacy." The defendant made no suggestive remarks or gestures and there was no evidence that he was sexually aroused. After obtaining the information sought, defendant went on his way.
The evidence of the Commonwealth is insufficient to prove the lascivious intent required under the statute, and the convictions cannot be upheld. McKeon v. Commonwealth, 211 Va. 24, 26-27, 175 S.E.2d 282, 284 (1970).
The judgments are reversed and set aside and the cases are remanded to the court below for a new trial if the Commonwealth be so advised.
Reversed and remanded.