Case Name: Mario AMERSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-01-20
Citations: 125 S.W.3d 363
Docket Number: No. ED 82744
Parties: Mario AMERSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 125
Pages: 363–363

Head Matter:
Mario AMERSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 82744.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Jan. 20, 2004.
Gary E. Brotherton, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Mario Amerson appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing. He contends his plea counsel's mistaken sentencing assurance rendered his guilty plea unintelligent and involuntary.
Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).