Case Name: In the Matter of Scott Jon Zabransky, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. SCOTT JON ZABRANSKY, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2000-04-19
Citations: 166 Or. App. 672
Docket Number: MC 97-21; CA A99281
Parties: In the Matter of Scott Jon Zabransky, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. SCOTT JON ZABRANSKY, Appellant.
Judges: Before Deits, Chief Judge, and Edmonds, De Muniz, Landau, Haselton, Armstrong, Wollheim, and Brewer, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 166
Pages: 672–675

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted June 4, 19998; resubmitted en banc February 16,
affirmed April 19, 2000
In the Matter of Scott Jon Zabransky, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. SCOTT JON ZABRANSKY, Appellant.
(MC 97-21; CA A99281)
998 P2d 805
Hilary E. Berkman argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.
Richard D. Wasserman, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.
Before Deits, Chief Judge, and Edmonds, De Muniz, Landau, Haselton, Armstrong, Wollheim, and Brewer, Judges.
PER CURIAM
Edmonds, J., dissenting.
Armstrong, J., dissenting.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Appellant seeks review of the trial court's order finding him to be mentally ill and committing him to the Mental Health Division for a period of 180 days. Appellant's only argument that warrants discussion is that the trial court's advice under ORS 426.100(1) was inadequate. That argument is identical in substance to the one that we considered and rejected in State v. Buffum, 166 Or App 552, 999 P2d 541 (2000)
Affirmed.