Case Name: MANSFIELD et al. v. ORANGE INV. CO.
Court: Texas Courts of Civil Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1924-03-26
Citations: 263 S.W. 658
Docket Number: No. 1085
Parties: MANSFIELD et al. v. ORANGE INV. CO.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 263
Pages: 658–658

Head Matter:
MANSFIELD et al. v. ORANGE INV. CO.
(No. 1085.)
(Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Beaumont.
March 26, 1924.
Rehearing Denied April 9, 1924.)
Appeal and error <@3»66(>(2) — Certiorari to show answers of jurors as to qualifications not allowed after judgment on appeal.
After judgment is entered on appeal, amendment or correction or addition to transcript cannot be made, and party cannot have cer-tiorari to bring up bill ,of exceptions setting forth full interrogation of jurors ah to their qualifications.
Appeal from District Court, Orange County; A. D. Lipscomb, Special Judge.
On motion for rehearing.
Overruled.
Eor former opinion, see 260 S. W. 307.
Howth & O’Fiel, of Beaumont, for appellants.
Holland & Holland, of Orange, for appel-lee.

Opinion:
WALKER, J.
Since the filing of our opinion on original submission in this case, appellants have filed a petition for certiorari, asking permission to bring up tbeir bill of exception complaining. of the action of the court in overruling thejr challenges to the jurors, wherein is set forth the full interrogation of the jurors on the issue of their qualification. This motion comes too late. After we have entered a judgment on' the record as before us," we are not permitted, by tbe rules governing our court, to permit an amendment or correction or addition to the transcript. Woolley v. Nelson (Tex. Civ. App.) 250 S. W. 481.
Appellants' motion for rehearing, after being carefully reviewed by us, is in all things overruled.
<®5»For other cases'see same topic and KEY-NUMBER In all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes