Case Name: Evins F. Glore & Son v. Bennett Rose and Others, Impleaded with Henry Hauer, Inc., and Another, and Freed Heater Company and Another
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1930-04
Citations: 229 A.D. 709
Docket Number: 
Parties: Evins F. Glore & Son v. Bennett Rose and Others, Impleaded with Henry Hauer, Inc., and Another, and Freed Heater Company and Another.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 229
Pages: 709–709

Head Matter:
Evins F. Glore & Son v. Bennett Rose and Others, Impleaded with Henry Hauer, Inc., and Another, and Freed Heater Company and Another.

Opinion:
In view of the amendments proposed by respondents to the case on appeal, the application for an extension of time made by appellants does not now appear unreasonable. The motion for reargument is granted and upon reargument the appellants' time is extended until May 1, 1930. But no matter what difficulties arise, no further time to perfect the appeal will be granted. Present — Dowling, P. J., McAvoy, Martin, O'Malley and Sherman; JJ.