Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edwin Amoldo REYES, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-11-30
Citations: 402 F. App'x 802
Docket Number: No. 10-6760
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Edwin Amoldo REYES, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 402
Pages: 802–803

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Edwin Amoldo REYES, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 10-6760.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 18, 2010.
Decided: Nov. 30, 2010.
Edwin Arnoldo Reyes, Appellant Pro Se. Deborah A. Johnston, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Edwin Arnoldo Reyes appeals from the district court's order denying his motion to construe his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion as a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion. In his informal brief, Reyes challenges an earlier order denying his § 3582 motion. Assuming that Reyes has properly appealed this order, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Reyes, No. 8:01-cr-00533-PJM-20 (D.Md. Mar. 8, 2010). We deny Reyes' motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.