Case Name: Robert GAMBLE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2013-03-12
Citations: 393 S.W.3d 619
Docket Number: No. ED 98183
Parties: Robert GAMBLE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and LISA VAN AMBURG, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 393
Pages: 619–619

Head Matter:
Robert GAMBLE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 98183.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
March 12, 2013.
Timothy Forneris, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Gregory L. Barnes, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and LISA VAN AMBURG, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Robert Gamble, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing on two of his three claims. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).