Case Name: Dale Harvey BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee
Court: Arkansas Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Arkansas
Decision Date: 2011-09-15
Citations: 383 S.W.3d 847
Docket Number: No. CR 11-535
Parties: Dale Harvey BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 383
Pages: 847–847

Head Matter:
2011 Ark. 364
Dale Harvey BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee.
No. CR 11-535.
Supreme Court of Arkansas.
Sept. 15, 2011.
Sharon Kiel, Little Rock, for appellant.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
[Appellant Dale Harvey Brown now petitions this court to proceed in forma pau-peris and requests this court to appoint Sharon Kiel as counsel to represent him in the instant appeal. Attached to his motion is an affidavit setting forth that Appellant is indigent. We hold that Appellant is indigent and, therefore, appoint Ms. Kiel to represent him in connection with this appeal.
Appellant, by and through Ms. Kiel, has also filed a motion for rule on clerk. Therein, Ms. Kiel admits fault for failing to timely file the record. This court clarified its treatment of motions for rule on clerk and motions for belated appeals in McDonald v. State, 356 Ark. 106, 146 S.W.3d 883 (2004). There, we said that there are only two possible reasons for an appeal not being timely perfected: either the party or attorney filing the appeal is at fault, or there is "good reason." Id. at 116, 146 S.W.3d at 891. We explained:
Where an appeal is not timely perfected, either the party or attorney filing the appeal is at fault, or there is good reason that the appeal was not timely perfected. The party or attorney filing the appeal is therefore faced with two op-turns. First, where the party or attorney filing the appeal is at fault, fault should be admitted by affidavit filed with the motion or in the motion itself. There is no advantage in declining to admit fault where fault exists. Second, where the party or attorney believes that there is good treason the appeal was not perfected, the case for good reason can be made in the motion, and this court will decide whether good reason is present.
Id. (footnote omitted). While this court no longer requires an affidavit admitting fault before we will consider the motion, an attorney should candidly admit fault where he has erred and is responsible for the failure to perfect the appeal. See McDonald, 356 Ark. 106, 146 S.W.3d 888.
In accordance with McDonald, Ms. Kiel has candidly admitted fault. The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.
Motion for appointment of counsel granted; motion for rule on clerk granted.