Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Dominick Florio, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2015-02-05
Citations: 125 A.D.3d 451
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dominick Florio, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 125
Pages: 451–451

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dominick Florio, Appellant.
[999 NYS2d 741]

Opinion:
Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles H. Solomon, J.), rendered March 2, 2012, resentencing defendant to a term of 15 years, with 2V2 years' postrelease supervision, unanimously affirmed.
There was no unreasonable delay in resentencing defendant for the purpose of adding a term of postrelease supervision (see People v Williams, 14 NY3d 198, 213 [2010]). "[E]ven assuming that CPL 380.30 applies, there was no violation of the statute because defendant [ ] [was] resentenced within a reasonable time after DOCS notified the courts that [he was a] 'designated person[ ]' under Correction Law § 601-d" (id.). There is nothing in Williams, nor in any other authority, to suggest that the delay should be measured from the date that the Court of Appeals decided People v Sparber (10 NY3d 457 [2008]), which rendered resentencing necessary. Concur — Acosta, J.P., Renwick, Feinman, Clark and Kapnick, JJ.