Case Name: Joe LANE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-11-09
Citations: 550 So. 2d 1195
Docket Number: No. 88-2022
Parties: Joe LANE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SHARP and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 550
Pages: 1195–1196

Head Matter:
Joe LANE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 88-2022.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Nov. 9, 1989.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Barbara L. Condon, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Laura Griffin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
DANIEL, Chief Judge.
Defendant Joe Lane appeals his judgment and sentence which were imposed by the trial court after defendant pleaded guilty to violating his probation. In imposing sentence upon the defendant the trial court departed from the guidelines and from the permissive one cell bump-up range for probation violations and sentenced defendant to a term of five years imprisonment. This was error. Upon a violation of probation "a trial court may resentence the defendant to any term falling within the original guidelines range, including the one cell upward increase. However, no further increase or departure is permitted for any reason." Franklin v. State, 545 So.2d 851, 853 (Fla.1989). See also Dewberry v. State, 546 So.2d 409 (Fla.1989); State v. Tuthill, 545 So.2d 850 (Fla.1989); Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d 838 (Fla.1989); Branton v. State, 548 So.2d 882 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). Accordingly, defendant's sentence must be vacated and this matter remanded for resentencing.
Judgment AFFIRMED; sentence VACATED; case REMANDED for resentenc-ing.
SHARP and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14).