Case Name: CITY OF MANGUM v. TODD
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1918-08-27
Citations: 71 Okla. 59
Docket Number: No. 9837
Parties: CITY OF MANGUM v. TODD.
Judges: All the Justices concur.
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 71
Pages: 59–59

Head Matter:
CITY OF MANGUM v. TODD.
No. 9837
Opinion Filed Aug. 27, 1918.
Rehearing Denied Sept. 24, 1918.
(175 Pac. 197.)
(Syllabus.)
Appeal and Error — Dismissal—Attestation and Filing — Case-Made.
Motion to dismiss appeal sustained for the reasons stated in the opinion.
Error from District Court, Greer County; Thomas A. Edwards, Judge.
Action between the City of Mangum and Jarrett Todd. Judgment for the latter, and the former brings error.
Dismissed.
,H. H. Edwards, for plaintiff in error.
H. D. Henry, in pro per.

Opinion:
KANE, J.
This cause comes on to be heard up::n motion to dismiss appeal upon thej following grounds: (1) Because said case-made was not attested by the clerk of the court and the seal of the court thereto attached as required by the order of the court and by section 5242, Revised Laws 1910, as amended by the act approved March 21, 1917 (Session Laws 1917, p. 401, c. 218). (2) Because said case-made was not filejd with the papers in said case as required by section 5242 Revised Laws 1910, as amended by the act approved March 21, 1917 (Session Laws 1917, p. 401).,
This motion is accompanied by a brief containing the citation of authorities which seem to sustain the grounds for dismissal stated therein. As there is no response on the part of counsei'lfor plaintiff in error, and the authorities cited seem to be in point, the motion to dismiss appeal will be sustained.
All the Justices concur.