Case Name: Vincent Codella, Respondent, v. William Murray, Doing Business as Murray Auto Sales, Defendant, and Murray Auto Sales, Inc., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1956-03-12
Citations: 1 A.D.2d 893
Docket Number: 
Parties: Vincent Codella, Respondent, v. William Murray, Doing Business as Murray Auto Sales, Defendant, and Murray Auto Sales, Inc., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 1
Pages: 893–893

Head Matter:
Vincent Codella, Respondent, v. William Murray, Doing Business as Murray Auto Sales, Defendant, and Murray Auto Sales, Inc., Appellant.

Opinion:
— Appeal from so much of an interlocutory judgment as (1) reforms a written contract entered into with respondent, as an employee, so as to have the contract recite that appellant, and not the defendant, was the contracting employer; (2) directs appellant to account to respondent for profits to which he is entitled under said agreement; and (3) refers the matter of taking and stating the account to a referee. Interlocutory judgment, insofar as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present—Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.