Case Name: In the Matter of Subway Check Cashing Service, Inc., Appellant, v. Jill M. Considine, as Superintendent of Banks of State of New York, et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1990-02-22
Citations: 158 A.D.2d 406
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Subway Check Cashing Service, Inc., Appellant, v Jill M. Considine, as Superintendent of Banks of State of New York, et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 158
Pages: 406–407

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Subway Check Cashing Service, Inc., Appellant, v Jill M. Considine, as Superintendent of Banks of State of New York, et al., Respondents.

Opinion:
IAS did not err in holding that petitioner, a licensed check casher, lacked standing under Banking Law § 369 to challenge the issuance of a check-cashing license to a competitor at nearby location, since a competitive injury, in and of itself, does not confer standing to challenge an administrative determination (Matter of Dairylea Coop. v Walkley, 38 NY2d 6; Matter of Nostrand Check Cashing Co. v Clark, 27 Misc 2d 799, affd 13 AD2d 922). In any event, the record contains a rational basis for respondents' finding that the proposed new check-cashing facility would "promote the convenience and advantage of the area" (Banking Law § 369 [1]). Concur— Rosenberger, J. P., Asch, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.