Case Name: Edmund Y. CHEIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Richard SHUMSKY, Chief Probation Officer LA County; California State Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-08-13
Citations: 340 F.3d 786
Docket Number: No. 01-56320
Parties: Edmund Y. CHEIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Richard SHUMSKY, Chief Probation Officer LA County; California State Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 340
Pages: 786–786

Head Matter:
Edmund Y. CHEIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Richard SHUMSKY, Chief Probation Officer LA County; California State Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 01-56320.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Aug. 13, 2003.
Charles M. Sevilla, Esq., Law Office, San Diego, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.
Brentford Ferriera, Matthew G. Monfor-ton, Esq., District Attorney-Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondent Appellee.
Cliff Gardner, Esq., San Francisco, CA, for Amicus.

Opinion:
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
. Judge Fisher was recused.