Case Name: David R. FISHER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1994-06-17
Citations: 638 So. 2d 196
Docket Number: No. 93-1683
Parties: David R. FISHER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: W. SHARP, GRIFFIN, and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 638
Pages: 196–197

Head Matter:
David R. FISHER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 93-1683.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
June 17, 1994.
Howard H. Babb, Jr., Public Defender, and Tania Alavi, Asst. Public Defender, Oca-la, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Mark S. Dunn, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Based on the state's concession of error in this ease, we reverse the judgment holding Fisher in direct criminal contempt. The state agreed the trial judge failed to comply with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.830 specifically because it failed to include in its judgment "a recital of those facts on which adjudication of guilt is based prior to the adjudication of guilt .which is mandated by the rule.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
W. SHARP, GRIFFIN, and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.