Case Name: Barclay Ball, Respondent, v. Nippon Yusen (Kabushiki) Kaisha and Canadian Pacific Railway Company, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1932-03-25
Citations: 143 Misc. 243
Docket Number: 
Parties: Barclay Ball, Respondent, v. Nippon Yusen (Kabushiki) Kaisha and Canadian Pacific Railway Company, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 143
Pages: 243–243

Head Matter:
Barclay Ball, Respondent, v. Nippon Yusen (Kabushiki) Kaisha and Canadian Pacific Railway Company, Appellants.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
March 25, 1932.
Hardin, Hess & Eder [.Harold B. Elgar and Frank Bashap of counsel], for appellant Canadian Pacific Railway Company.
Burlingham, Veeder, Fearey, Clark & Hupper [Bay Bood Allen and Burton H. White of counsel], for the appellant Nippon Yusen Kaisha.
Single & Single [Gregory S. Bivkins and Frank H. Gerrodette of counsel], for the respondent.
Aff'g. 142 Misc. 201.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Orders affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on the authority of Brown v. Canadian Pacific R. Co. (143 Misc. 239), decided herewith.