Case Name: John V. Sweeney, App'lt, v. Ellen Redmond, Resp't
Court: New York Court of Common Pleas
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1893-08-09
Citations: 53 N.Y. St. Rep. 938
Docket Number: 
Parties: John V. Sweeney, App'lt, v. Ellen Redmond, Resp’t.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 53
Pages: 938–938

Head Matter:
John V. Sweeney, App'lt, v. Ellen Redmond, Resp’t.
Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of the district court in the city of New York for the first judicial district, rendered upon a trial before the justice thereof, without a jury.
Action for services as a physician and surgeon.
T. E. Tomlinson, for app’lt; John Callahan, for resp’t.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The questions presented for solution on this appeal are only those involving facts in respect whereof there is a conflict of evidence. Careful consideration of the evidence satisfies us that the decision of the justice was in all respects correct, and, therefore, the judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
Bischoee and Giegerich, JJ., concur.