Case Name: ONKAR S. NARULA, M.D., P.A., a Florida professional corporation, and Onkar S. Narula, Petitioners, v. CARDIAC DIAGNOSTIC SERVICE, LTD., a Florida limited partnership, Recarey Enterprises, Inc., a Florida corporation, International Medical Centers, Inc., H.M.O.; Associated Doctors Hospitals, Inc., a Florida corporation d/b/a Miami International Hospital, Miguel Recarey, and Eddy Fernandez, Respondents
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1985-09-10
Citations: 474 So. 2d 1278
Docket Number: Nos. 85-208, 85-210
Parties: ONKAR S. NARULA, M.D., P.A., a Florida professional corporation, and Onkar S. Narula, Petitioners, v. CARDIAC DIAGNOSTIC SERVICE, LTD., a Florida limited partnership, Recarey Enterprises, Inc., a Florida corporation, International Medical Centers, Inc., H.M.O.; Associated Doctors Hospitals, Inc., a Florida corporation d/b/a Miami International Hospital, Miguel Recarey, and Eddy Fernandez, Respondents.
Judges: Before HENDRY, HUBBART and JOR-GENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 474
Pages: 1278–1279

Head Matter:
ONKAR S. NARULA, M.D., P.A., a Florida professional corporation, and Onkar S. Narula, Petitioners, v. CARDIAC DIAGNOSTIC SERVICE, LTD., a Florida limited partnership, Recarey Enterprises, Inc., a Florida corporation, International Medical Centers, Inc., H.M.O.; Associated Doctors Hospitals, Inc., a Florida corporation d/b/a Miami International Hospital, Miguel Recarey, and Eddy Fernandez, Respondents.
Nos. 85-208, 85-210.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Sept. 10, 1985.
Haddad, Josephs & Jack and Denise V. Powers, Coral Gables, for petitioners.
Robert L. Koeppel and Elsa Alvarez, Miami, for respondents.
Before HENDRY, HUBBART and JOR-GENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition for writ of certiorari Onkar S. Narula, M.D., seeks review of a trial court order dismissing his complaint and compelling arbitration. We agree with his contention that the defendants' demand for arbitration was untimely and, therefore, quash the order under review and remand with directions to reinstate plaintiff's complaint and proceed to trial. See Lapidus v. Arlen Beach Condominium Ass'n, 394 So.2d 1102 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); see also Hansen v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 408 So.2d 658 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), rev. denied, 417 So.2d 328 (Fla.1982).
Certiorari' granted; order quashed; cause remanded.