Case Name: Sarah N. Stanwood v. City of Omaha
Court: Nebraska Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Nebraska
Decision Date: 1894-10-16
Citations: 42 Neb. 303
Docket Number: No. 5639
Parties: Sarah N. Stanwood v. City of Omaha.
Judges: 
Reporter: Nebraska Reports
Volume: 42
Pages: 303–304

Head Matter:
Sarah N. Stanwood v. City of Omaha.
Filed October 16, 1894.
No. 5639.
Review: Sufficiency of Evidence. This case examined, and held that the verdict of the jury was supported by sufficient competent evidence, and the judgment of the district court is affirmed.-
Rehearing of case reported in 38 Neb., 552.
Charles B. Keller, for plaintiff in error.
W. J. Connell and K. J. Cornish, contra.

Opinion:
Ragan, C.
This is a rehearing of Stanwood v. City of Omaha, 38 Neb., 552, where a sufficient statement of the facts will be found for a proper understanding of the matter in controversy. There is no question of law involved in the case. The finding of the jury is supported by sufficient competent evidence, and we cannot, therefore, disturb it. The case as reported in 38 Neb., 552, is overruled and the judgment of the district court is
Aeeirmed.