Case Name: Vinton J. CROSBY v. Lois Pitre CROSBY
Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1983-12-08
Citations: 442 So. 2d 1248
Docket Number: No. 82-CA-205
Parties: Vinton J. CROSBY v. Lois Pitre CROSBY.
Judges: Before BOWES, GAUDIN and DU-FRESNE, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 442
Pages: 1248–1249

Head Matter:
Vinton J. CROSBY v. Lois Pitre CROSBY.
No. 82-CA-205.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 8, 1983.
Robert G. Creely, Gretna, for plaintiff/defendant in rule/appellee/mover.
C. David Schumacher and Carl J. Schu-macher, Jr., New Orleans, for defendant/plaintiff in rule/appellant.
Constance Charles Willems, President, Louisiana Ass’n for Women Attys., New Orleans.
Before BOWES, GAUDIN and DU-FRESNE, JJ.

Opinion:
ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING
PER CURIAM.
Our original opinion is reported at 434 So.2d 162. Subsequently, we granted a rehearing and heard oral arguments.
While the merits of the rehearing were under advisement, the following joint motion was filed by the parties:
"It is stipulated by and between the plaintiff and defendant that this suit has been compromised and settled and the parties move it be dismissed with prejudice, each party to pay its own respective costs."
Accordingly, a ruling on the rehearing is moot and will not be forthcoming.