Case Name: Brian THOMASON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-09-29
Citations: 977 S.W.2d 277
Docket Number: No. 73178
Parties: Brian THOMASON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before JAMES R. DOWD, P.J., and CRAHAN and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 977
Pages: 277–277

Head Matter:
Brian THOMASON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. 73178.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Sept. 29, 1998.
Dave Hemingway, Asst. Sp. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Kenneth P. Ferguson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before JAMES R. DOWD, P.J., and CRAHAN and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Brian Thomason (Movant) filed a Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after he pleaded guilty to several charges in two separate cases. The motion court denied his motion without a hearing. Movant appeals from this judgment, arguing he is entitled to a hearing on his two claims of ineffective assistance of counsel.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).