Case Name: D.L.F., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2001-09-19
Citations: 793 So. 2d 1188
Docket Number: No. 3D01-23
Parties: D.L.F., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and LEVY and SHEVIN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 793
Pages: 1188–1188

Head Matter:
D.L.F., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D01-23.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Sept. 19, 2001.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Andrew Stanton, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Michael Neimand (Ft.Lauderdale), Assistant Attorney General, and Marni A. Bryson, Legal Intern, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and LEVY and SHEVIN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the evidentiary ruling challenged on appeal. "It is axiomatic that failure to proffer what the excluded evidence would have revealed precludes appellate consideration of the alleged error." A. McD. v. State, 422 So.2d 336, 337 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Mosley v. State, 616 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). However, on remand, the trial court shall conform the written community control order to reflect the oral pronouncement withholding adjudication.
Affirmed; remanded with instructions.