Case Name: Edwin Reeves HAZEL, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. C. MCELVOGUE, Captain, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-08-28
Citations: 443 F. App'x 875
Docket Number: No. 11-6740
Parties: Edwin Reeves HAZEL, III, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. C. MCELVOGUE, Captain, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 443
Pages: 875–875

Head Matter:
Edwin Reeves HAZEL, III, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. C. MCELVOGUE, Captain, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 11-6740.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 18, 2011.
Decided: Aug. 28, 2011.
Edwin Reeves Hazel, III, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene P. Corrigan, III, Harry V. Ragsdale, Corrigan & Chandler, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Edwin Reeves Hazel, III, appeals the district court's judgment adopting the magistrate judge's report and recommendation granting summary judgment to Ap-pellee Captain C. McElvogue, and dismissing Hazel's 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pau-peris and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Hazel v. McElvogue, No. 8:10-cv-00524-RMG, 2011 WL 1559227 (D.S.C. Apr. 25, 2011). We grant McElvogue's motion to strike certain affidavits from the docket. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.