Case Name: James M. Dunlap, respondent, v. Emma D. Chenoweth et al., appellants
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1919-05-08
Citations: 90 N.J. Eq. 601
Docket Number: 
Parties: James M. Dunlap, respondent, v. Emma D. Chenoweth et al., appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 90
Pages: 601–602

Head Matter:
James M. Dunlap, respondent, v. Emma D. Chenoweth et al., appellants.
[Decided May 8th, 1919.]
On appeal from an order of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Backes, and reported in 88 N. J. Eq. 496.
Mr. David O. Watkins, for the respondent.
Mr. Timothy J. Middleton and Mr. Herbert A. Drake, for the appellants.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kaliscit, Black, White, HepPENHEIMER, WILLIAMS, TAYLOR, GARDNER — 13.
For reversal — None.