Case Name: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Cornell WATTS, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-02-20
Citations: 595 So. 2d 19
Docket Number: No. 77820
Parties: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Cornell WATTS, Respondent.
Judges: SHAW, C.J. and McDONALD, BARKETT, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 595
Pages: 19–19

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Cornell WATTS, Respondent.
No. 77820.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Feb. 20, 1992.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Bradley R. Bischoff, Tallahassee, for petitioner.
Ted A. Stokes, Milton, for respondent.

Opinion:
OVERTON, Justice.
The State of Florida petitions this Court to review Watts v. State, 578 So.2d 487 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), in which the First District Court of Appeal reversed Watt's sentencing as a habitual offender. The district court certified the following question as being of great public importance:
WHETHER SECTION 775.084(l)(a)l, FLORIDA STATUTES (SUPP.1988), WHICH DEFINES HABITUAL FELONY OFFENDERS AS THOSE WHO HAVE "PREVIOUSLY BEEN CONVICTED OF TWO OR MORE FELONIES," REQUIRES THAT EACH OF THE FELONIES BE COMMITTED AFTER CONVICTION FOR THE IMMEDIATELY PREVIOUS OFFENSE.
Id. at 438-39.
We answered this same certified question in the negative in our decision in State v. Barnes, 595 So.2d 22 (Fla.1992). Accordingly, we quash that portion of the district court's decision reversing Watt's sentencing as a habitual offender and remand this case for further proceedings consistent with our opinion in Barnes.
It is so ordered.
SHAW, C.J. and McDONALD, BARKETT, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.
. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.