Case Name: Paul D. BAKER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. C.J. CEPAK, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-08-20
Citations: 42 F. App'x 660
Docket Number: No. 02-6702
Parties: Paul D. BAKER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. C.J. CEPAK, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 42
Pages: 660–661

Head Matter:
Paul D. BAKER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. C.J. CEPAK, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 02-6702.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 15, 2002.
Decided Aug. 20, 2002.
Paul D. Baker, Appellant Pro Se. John H. McLees, Jr., Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Paul D. Baker seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Baker v. Cepak, No. CA-01-465 (W.D.Va. Apr. 22, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.