Case Name: MAHLON SPEICHER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY TELEPHONE COMPANY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1897-03
Citations: 60 N.J.L. 242
Docket Number: 
Parties: MAHLON SPEICHER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY TELEPHONE COMPANY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 60
Pages: 242–242

Head Matter:
MAHLON SPEICHER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY TELEPHONE COMPANY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
On error to the Supreme Court.
For the plaintiff in error, Samuel Kalisch.
For the defendant in error, Depue & Parher.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given by that court.
For affirmance—Depue, Gummere, Ludlow, Van Syckel, Bogert, Dayton, Hendrickson, Nixon. 8.
For reversal—None.