Case Name: Carlos GARCIA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2006-02-15
Citations: 920 So. 2d 204
Docket Number: No. 4D05-3755
Parties: Carlos GARCIA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: STEVENSON, C.J., POLEN and KLEIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 920
Pages: 204–204

Head Matter:
Carlos GARCIA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D05-3755.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb. 15, 2006.
Carlos Garcia, Cross City, pro se.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Claudine M. LaFrance, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We reverse an order summarily denying appellant's 3.850 motion because the affidavit of the victim could constitute newly discovered evidence which would not be barred by untimeliness.
STEVENSON, C.J., POLEN and KLEIN, JJ., concur.