Case Name: In the Matter of Antonios Stamos, Petitioner, v. Appeals Board of Yonkers Parking Violations Bureau, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2016-03-23
Citations: 137 A.D.3d 1152
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Antonios Stamos, Petitioner, v Appeals Board of Yonkers Parking Violations Bureau, Respondent.
Judges: Rivera, J.R, Balkin, Cohen and Barros, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 137
Pages: 1152–1153

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Antonios Stamos, Petitioner, v Appeals Board of Yonkers Parking Violations Bureau, Respondent.
[26 NYS3d 881]

Opinion:
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Appeals Board of the Yonkers Parking Violations Bureau dated October 29, 2014, affirming a determination of an administrative law judge dated May 21, 2014, which, after a hearing, found that the petitioner violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 306 (b), and imposed a penalty.
Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.
Judicial review of an administrative determination made after a hearing at which evidence was taken is limited to whether the determination is supported by substantial evidence based upon the entire record (see CPLR 7803 [4]; Matter of Snitow v New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs., 121 AD3d 1008 [2014]). Substantial evidence is "such relevant proof as a reasonable mind may accept as adequate to support a conclusion or ultimate fact" (300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 180 [1978]).
Here, substantial evidence supports the determination that the petitioner violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 306 (b) (see Matter of Milord v New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs., 125 AD3d 972 [2015]).
Rivera, J.R, Balkin, Cohen and Barros, JJ., concur.