Case Name: William Fernando BEARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dorthy TUELL, Manager; Helen F. Fahey, Chairwoman; David N. Harker; Carol Ann Sievers, Defendants-Appellees, and Department of Corrections; Virginia Parole Board, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-02-03
Citations: 164 F. App'x 438
Docket Number: No. 05-7476
Parties: William Fernando BEARD, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Dorthy TUELL, Manager; Helen F. Fahey, Chairwoman; David N. Harker; Carol Ann Sievers, Defendants—Appellees, and Department of Corrections; Virginia Parole Board, Defendants.
Judges: Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 164
Pages: 438–439

Head Matter:
William Fernando BEARD, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Dorthy TUELL, Manager; Helen F. Fahey, Chairwoman; David N. Harker; Carol Ann Sievers, Defendants—Appellees, and Department of Corrections; Virginia Parole Board, Defendants.
No. 05-7476.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 26, 2006.
Decided: Feb. 3, 2006.
William Fernando Beard, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, Office of The Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
William Fernando Beard appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no re versible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Beard v. Tuell, No. CA-04-764-2 (E.D.Va. Aug. 17, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED