Case Name: Keyon RIDDICK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HERLOCK, Mr. Director of Security; Jo Hong, Correctional Officer; Faux, Mr. Correctional Officer, Defendants-Appellees, and Chan, Correctional Officer; Justice, Correctional Officer; Wittaker, Correctional Officer/Sergeant; Ray, Correctional Officer; Mails, Correctional Officer/Sergeant, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-06-25
Citations: 576 F. App'x 237
Docket Number: No. 13-6194
Parties: Keyon RIDDICK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HERLOCK, Mr. Director of Security; Jo Hong, Correctional Officer; Faux, Mr. Correctional Officer, Defendants-Appellees, and Chan, Correctional Officer; Justice, Correctional Officer; Wittaker, Correctional Officer/Sergeant; Ray, Correctional Officer; Mails, Correctional Officer/Sergeant, Defendants.
Judges: Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 576
Pages: 237–237

Head Matter:
Keyon RIDDICK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HERLOCK, Mr. Director of Security; Jo Hong, Correctional Officer; Faux, Mr. Correctional Officer, Defendants-Appellees, and Chan, Correctional Officer; Justice, Correctional Officer; Wittaker, Correctional Officer/Sergeant; Ray, Correctional Officer; Mails, Correctional Officer/Sergeant, Defendants.
No. 13-6194.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 12, 2014.
Decided: June 25, 2014.
Keyon Riddick, Appellant Pro Se. Alexander Francuzenko, Lee Brinson Warren, Cook Craig & Francuzenko, PLLC, Fair-fax, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Vacated and remanded by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
On January 25, 2013, the district court dismissed Keyon Riddick's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) case without prejudice for failure to timely file an exhaustion affidavit. Riddick timely appealed, and we ordered a limited remand for the district court to determine whether Riddick timely placed his exhaustion affidavit within the prison mailing system. After Riddick filed a verified statement asserting that he had complied with the district court's original order to timely file his exhaustion affidavit, the district court entered an order finding that Riddick had timely filed his exhaustion affidavit and concluding that the case was now ripe to proceed.
Accordingly, we vacate the district court's January 25, 2013 order dismissing Riddick's complaint and remand for further proceedings. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
VACATED AND REMANDED.