Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Larry Martin CAIN, a/k/a Duke, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-04-01
Citations: 564 F. App'x 39
Docket Number: No. 13-7886
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Larry Martin CAIN, a/k/a Duke, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 564
Pages: 39–39

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Larry Martin CAIN, a/k/a Duke, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-7886.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 27, 2014.
Decided: April 1, 2014.
Larry Martin Cain, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley, Jr., Jimmie Ewing, Stanley D. Ragsdale, Assistant United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina; Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Larry Martin Cain appeals the district court's order denying his motion to compel the specific performance of the plea agreement. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Cain, No. 4:09-cr-00073-TLW-16 (D.S.C. Oct. 8, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.