Case Name: STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. DANIEL HARDIE, Defendant
Court: Montana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Montana
Decision Date: 2010-02-04
Citations: 359 Mont. 7
Docket Number: CAUSE NO. DC-07-07
Parties: STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. DANIEL HARDIE, Defendant.
Judges: Chairperson, Hon. Blair Jones, Member, Hon. Richard Simonton and Member, Hon. Ray Dayton.
Reporter: Montana Reports
Volume: 359
Pages: 7–8

Head Matter:
The District Court of the 14th Judicial District. County of Musselshell.
STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. DANIEL HARDIE, Defendant.
CAUSE NO. DC-07-07 DECISION

Opinion:
On September 15, 2009, the defendant was sentenced to a commitment to the Montana Department of Corrections for a term of five (5) years for placement in an appropriate program or facility for violation of the conditions of a suspended sentence for the following offenses: Count I: Burglary, a felony; and Count II: Criminal Mischief, a felony.
On February 4, 2010, the defendant's application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
The defendant was present via teleconference and was represented by Bert Certain. The state was not represented.
Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.
Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that "the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive." (§46-18-904(3), MCA).
The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.
Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.
Done in open Court this 4th day of February, 2010.
DATED this 24th day of February, 2010.
Chairperson, Hon. Blair Jones, Member, Hon. Richard Simonton and Member, Hon. Ray Dayton.