Case Name: ROSE v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1926-06-16
Citations: 286 S.W. 230
Docket Number: No. 10321
Parties: ROSE v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 286
Pages: 230–230

Head Matter:
ROSE v. STATE.
(No. 10321.)
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
June 16, 1926.)
Chaney & Dailey, of Dallas, for appellant.
Sam D. Stinson, State’s Atty., of Austin, and Robt. M. Dyles, Asst. State’s Atty., of Groesbeek, for the State.

Opinion:
BAKER, J.
The appellant was convicted in the criminal district court No. 2 of Dallas county for the offense- of theft of property over the value of $50, and his punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary,
There is np- statement of facts in the record, and no notice of appeal was given in the lower court. Without proper notice of appeal, this court is without jurisdiction. Article 827, 1925 C. O. P. (article 915, Vernon's C. C. P.); Baldwin v. State, 82 Tex. Cr. R. 243, 199 S. W. 468; Williams v. State, 87 Tex. Cr. R. 180, 220 S. W. 87.
Failing to find any notice of appeal in the record, this appeal is dismissed.
PER CURIAM.
The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.