Case Name: Phillip MIZRACH, as Successor Personal Representative of the Estate of Abraham I. Kurland, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee; Phillip Mizrach, as Successor Personal Representative of the Estate of Abraham I. Kurland, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. United States of America, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-03-09
Citations: 678 F. App'x 179
Docket Number: No. 16-1550, No. 16-1551
Parties: Phillip MIZRACH, as Successor Personal Representative of the Estate of Abraham I. Kurland, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. Phillip Mizrach, as Successor Personal Representative of the Estate of Abraham I. Kurland, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. United States of America, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before TRAXLER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 678
Pages: 179–180

Head Matter:
Phillip MIZRACH, as Successor Personal Representative of the Estate of Abraham I. Kurland, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. Phillip Mizrach, as Successor Personal Representative of the Estate of Abraham I. Kurland, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. United States of America, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 16-1550, No. 16-1551
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 1, 2017
Decided: March 9, 2017
Phillip Mizrach, Appellant Pro Se. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Neil R. White, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appel-lee.
Before TRAXLER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Phillip Mizrach appeals the district court's orders denying several post-judgment motions he filed following the dismissal of two Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2671-2680 (2012) complaints. We have reviewed the record included on appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mizrach v. United States, Nos. 1:11-cv-01153-RDB; 1:08-cv-02030-AMD, 2016 WL 7012668, 2016 WL 1446724 (D. Md. Nov. 12, 2015; Apr. 13, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED