Case Name: FITZGERALD SPEER COMPANY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. PETER J. KELLY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1912-11-18
Citations: 83 N.J.L. 626
Docket Number: 
Parties: FITZGERALD SPEER COMPANY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. PETER J. KELLY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 83
Pages: 626–627

Head Matter:
FITZGERALD SPEER COMPANY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. PETER J. KELLY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Argued March 13, 1912
Decided November 18, 1912.
On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 52 Vroom 6.
Eor the plaintiff in error, Martin P. Devlin.
Eor the defendant in error, John O. Yanatta and George H. Peirce.

Opinion:
Pee Curiam.
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in that court by the Chief Justiee.
For affirmance — Garrison, Swayze, Bergen, Yoorhees, Kaltsch, Bogert, Yeedenburgh, Congpon, White, Treaoy, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.