Case Name: Gregory LANGADINOS, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., Defendant, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-10-18
Citations: 48 F. App'x 4
Docket Number: No. 01-1833
Parties: Gregory LANGADINOS, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., Defendant, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 48
Pages: 4–4

Head Matter:
Gregory LANGADINOS, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., Defendant, Appellee.
No. 01-1833.
United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
Oct. 18, 2002.
Gregory Langadinos on brief pro se.
Tory A. Weigand, Gary W. Harvey and Morrison, Mahoney, & Miller on brief for appellee.
Before BOUDIN, Chief Judge, TORRUELLA and HOWARD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
After carefully reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we affirm substantially for the reasons given by the district court. Despite notice and without excuse, the appellant failed to carry out the court's orders concerning discovery and sanctions. He also burdened the court and the appellee with needless delays. Robson v. Hollenbeck, 81 F.3d 1 (1st Cir.1996); United States v. One 1987 BMW, 985 F.2d 655, 657 (1st Cir.1993). The court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the action. Velazquez-Rivera v. Sea-Land Service, Inc., 920 F.2d 1072 (1st Cir.1990).
Affirmed. Loc. R. 27(c).