Case Name: Tyrone ELLIS Plaintiff-Appellant v. Nwannem OBI-OKOYE, Doctor, Correct Care Solutions; Brett Butler, Doctor, Correct Care Solutions Defendants-Appellees. Johnathan Simmons, Doctor, Correct Care Solutions Defendant. Geraldine Campbell, Advanced Practice Nurse, Correct Care Solutions; Aric Simmons, Advanced Practice Nurse, Correct Care Solutions; Melissa Mansfield, Licensed Practical Nurse, Correct Care Solutions Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-05-22
Citations: 685 F. App'x 508
Docket Number: No. 16-3874
Parties: Tyrone ELLIS Plaintiff-Appellant v. Nwannem OBI-OKOYE, Doctor, Correct Care Solutions; Brett Butler, Doctor, Correct Care Solutions Defendants-Appellees Johnathan Simmons, Doctor, Correct Care Solutions Defendant Geraldine Campbell, Advanced Practice Nurse, Correct Care Solutions; Aric Simmons, Advanced Practice Nurse, Correct Care Solutions; Melissa Mansfield, Licensed Practical Nurse, Correct Care Solutions Defendants-Appellees
Judges: Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 685
Pages: 508–509

Head Matter:
Tyrone ELLIS Plaintiff-Appellant v. Nwannem OBI-OKOYE, Doctor, Correct Care Solutions; Brett Butler, Doctor, Correct Care Solutions Defendants-Appellees Johnathan Simmons, Doctor, Correct Care Solutions Defendant Geraldine Campbell, Advanced Practice Nurse, Correct Care Solutions; Aric Simmons, Advanced Practice Nurse, Correct Care Solutions; Melissa Mansfield, Licensed Practical Nurse, Correct Care Solutions Defendants-Appellees
No. 16-3874
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: May 12, 2017
Filed: May 22, 2017
Tyrone Ellis, Pro Se
Brent J. Eubanks, Humphries & Odum, White Hall, AR, for Defendants-Appellees
Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Arkansas inmate Tyrone Ellis appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, in which he alleged that defendants were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs. Upon careful de novo review, see Peterson v. Kopp, 754 F.3d 594, 598 (8th Cir. 2014) (standard of review), we conclude that summary judgment was proper because, as explained by the district court, Ellis failed to show that his skin rash was "serious," or that any delay in treatment had a detrimental effect on his condition. See Fourte v. Faulkner Cty., Ark., 746 F.3d 384, 387 (8th Cir. 2014); see also Jackson v. Riebold, 815 F.3d 1114, 1119-20 (8th Cir. 2016).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Kristine G. Baker, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Beth Deere, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.