Case Name: Kurt HARNISHFAGER, Appellant, v. INDEPENDENT TRAVEL AGENCIES OF AMERICA, INC., and PK Computers, Inc., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-02-15
Citations: 676 So. 2d 1
Docket Number: No. 94-2977
Parties: Kurt HARNISHFAGER, Appellant, v. INDEPENDENT TRAVEL AGENCIES OF AMERICA, INC., and PK Computers, Inc., Appellees.
Judges: STONE, FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 676
Pages: 1–1

Head Matter:
Kurt HARNISHFAGER, Appellant, v. INDEPENDENT TRAVEL AGENCIES OF AMERICA, INC., and PK Computers, Inc., Appellees.
No. 94-2977.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb. 15, 1995.
Reconsideration and Rehearing Denied July 29, 1996.
Michael E. Wargo and Lori S. Weiss, of Rutherford, Minerley & Mulhall, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellant.
No brief filed for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm an order denying Appellant's motion to quash service of process. The trial court's order is without prejudice to Appellant's right to refile his motion at such time as there is evidence of attempted or purported service upon him individually. At this time Appellant's motion to quash is premature as, to date, the only indication in the record concerning service is the service upon a codefendant corporation. There is no evidence of any claim of service upon Appellant individually.
STONE, FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.