Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Enrique AVALOS-BARRIGA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-01-11
Citations: 362 F. App'x 615
Docket Number: No. 06-56693
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Enrique AVALOS-BARRIGA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 362
Pages: 615–616

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Enrique AVALOS-BARRIGA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-56693.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 15, 2009.
Filed Jan. 11, 2010.
Todd Robinson, Federal Office Building, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Enrique Avalos-Barriga, Adelanto, CA, pro se.
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Federal prisoner Enrique Avalos-Barri-ga appeals from the district court's judg ment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.
Because Avalos-Barriga's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel during trial has been explicitly addressed in a previous proceeding, we will not reconsider that issue. See United States v. Avalos-Barriga, 21 Fed.Appx. 626 (9th Cir.2001).
We deny Avalos-Barriga's request to expand the certificate of appealability. See 9th Cir. R. 22 — 1(e); see also Hiivala v. Wood, 195 F.3d 1098, 1104-05 (9th Cir.1999) (per curiam).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.