Case Name: Edwin H. CROSBY, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES AIR FORCE, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-03-19
Citations: 60 F. App'x 679
Docket Number: No. 02-35745; D.C. No. CV-01-00197-RFC
Parties: Edwin H. CROSBY, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES AIR FORCE, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 60
Pages: 679–679

Head Matter:
Edwin H. CROSBY, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES AIR FORCE, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 02-35745.
D.C. No. CV-01-00197-RFC.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 10, 2003.
Decided March 19, 2003.
Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Edwin Crosby appeals pro se the district court's dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction of his action regarding the Air Force's designation of the reason for his discharge in 1971. He seeks to set aside a prior judgment of the United States District Court in New York. We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's Order filed on May 7, 2002.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.