Case Name: Francis PIERRE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Commonwealth of VIRGINIA, Office of the Attorney General; Arlington County General District Court, The Judges and the Clerk's Office; Washington Shuttle, Incorporated, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-08-19
Citations: 42 F. App'x 648
Docket Number: No. 02-1180
Parties: Francis PIERRE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Commonwealth of VIRGINIA, Office of the Attorney General; Arlington County General District Court, The Judges and the Clerk’s Office; Washington Shuttle, Incorporated, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 42
Pages: 648–649

Head Matter:
Francis PIERRE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Commonwealth of VIRGINIA, Office of the Attorney General; Arlington County General District Court, The Judges and the Clerk’s Office; Washington Shuttle, Incorporated, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 02-1180.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 15, 2002.
Decided Aug. 19, 2002.
Francis Pierre, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Francis Pierre appeals the district court's order dismissing his attempt to appeal his state action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Pierre v. Virginia, No. CA-02-71A (E.D.Va. Jan. 15, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.