Case Name: Angela STROMN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-11-29
Citations: 552 So. 2d 352
Docket Number: No. 89-0496
Parties: Angela STROMN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and GARRETT, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 552
Pages: 352–352

Head Matter:
Angela STROMN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 89-0496.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Nov. 29, 1989.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Jeffrey L. Anderson, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Deborah Guller, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
REVERSED. We find the record of the question and answer exchange between the appellant and the trial court insufficient to constitute a factual predicate for the trial court's adjudication of direct criminal contempt. See Silver v. State, 117 So.2d 509 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960).
ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and GARRETT, JJ., concur.