Case Name: FAHNING, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1911-12-06
Citations: 132 N.Y.S. 1128
Docket Number: 
Parties: FAHNING, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 132
Pages: 1128–1128

Head Matter:
FAHNING, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO., Appellant.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
December 6, 1911.)
Action by William Fahning, as administrator, etc., against the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Judgment and order reversed, and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that the law of the case, as charged by the court, being in effect that the only duty resting upon the defendant was not to wantonly, wickedly, or recklessly injure plaintiff's intestate, the proof did not warrant the jury's finding that the defendant violated that duty.