Case Name: Philip Zwiebel et al., appellees, v. William Sehestedt et al., appellants
Court: Nebraska Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Nebraska
Decision Date: 1910-12-10
Citations: 88 Neb. 100
Docket Number: 16,225
Parties: Philip Zwiebel et al., appellees, v. William Sehestedt et al., appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Nebraska Reports
Volume: 88
Pages: 100–101

Head Matter:
Philip Zwiebel et al., appellees, v. William Sehestedt et al., appellants.
Filed December 10, 1910.
16,225.
1. Mortgages: Foreclosure: Appraisal: Presumptions. “An order denying a motion to vacate an appraisement of property for judicial sale on the ground that the appraisers’ valuation was too low will, in the absence of a hill of exceptions embodying the evidence given at the hearing, he presumed to be correct.” Johnston v. Craig, 61 Neb. 98.
2. -: -: -: Certificate of Liens: Confirmation of Sale. The failure of a county clerk to include in his certificate a statement of liens junior to those for the satisfaction of which the defendants’ land is to he sold, and his failure to attach his official seal to said certificate, do not prejudice the owners of the equity of redemption, and should not prevent the confirmation of a sale otherwise regular and lawful.
Appeal from the district court for Sarpy county: Lee S. Estelle, Judge.
Affirmed.
Anthony E. Langdon, for appellants.
B. F. Thomas, Oarl E. Herring and H. Z. Wedgwood, contra.

Opinion:
Root, J.
This is an appeal from an order overruling objections to the appraisal of, and to the confirmation of, a sale of certain real estate. The defendants appeal.
It is first argued that the appraised value of the real estate is too low. No bill of exceptions of the evidence submitted to the district court concerning the value of the real estate has been filed in this court, and we shall presume that the finding of the trial court upon the issue of value is sustained by the evidence. Johnson v. Craig, 61 Neb. 98.
The defendants contend that the district court erred in permitting the county clerk to attach his seal to his cer tificatu of incumbrances, and that the certificate is insufficient in that it does not refer to any liens junior to those included in the decree of foreclosure. The appellants own the equity of redemption of the mortgaged premises, and would not have been prejudiced if no certificate of liens had been filed. La Flume v. Jones, 5 Neb. 256; Smith v. Foxworthy, 39 Neb. 214; Hamer v. McKinley-Lanning Loan & Trust Co., 52 Neb. 705; Ballou v. Sherwood, 58 Neb. 20; Green v. Paul, 60 Neb. 7. It appears that the only incumbrances deducted were taxes, and that the property sold for more than two-thirds of its gross value as determined by the sheriff and the other appraisers.
For the reason that we find nothing in the record to suggest a suspicion that the appellants were in any manner prejudiced by the matters referred to in their brief, the judgment of the district court is
Affirmed.