Case Name: Christopher LAUGHMAN, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. ST. CHARLES COUNTY, Missouri, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-03-28
Citations: 16 S.W.3d 716
Docket Number: No. ED 76445
Parties: Christopher LAUGHMAN, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. ST. CHARLES COUNTY, Missouri, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANDALL, P.J. and HOFF, J. and PUDLOWSKI, S.J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 16
Pages: 716–717

Head Matter:
Christopher LAUGHMAN, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. ST. CHARLES COUNTY, Missouri, Defendant/Respondent.
No. ED 76445.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
March 28, 2000.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 10, 2000.
Rick Barry, Law Offices of Rick Barry, P.C., St. Louis, for appellant.
Joann Leykam, St. Charles County Counselor, St. Charles, for respondent.
Before CRANDALL, P.J. and HOFF, J. and PUDLOWSKI, S.J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Christopher Laughman (Laughman) appeals the circuit court's judgment and order granting summary judgment in favor of St. Charles County Sheriffs Department in this action challenging Laugh-man's termination of employment.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. Upon de novo review, we find no genuine issue of material fact or error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth reasons for our decision. Judgment affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).