Case Name: S. K. BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GEORGIA POWER COMPANY et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1974-03-14
Citations: 491 F.2d 117
Docket Number: No. 73-3569
Parties: S. K. BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GEORGIA POWER COMPANY et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WISDOM, GOLDBERG and GEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 491
Pages: 117–117

Head Matter:
S. K. BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GEORGIA POWER COMPANY et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 73-3569
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 14, 1974.
Percy J. Blount, Augusta, Ga., J. Nat Hamrick, Rutherfordton, N. C., for plaintiff-appellant.
Robert C. Norman, Augusta, Ga., Michael C. Murphy, Atlanta, Ga., for defendants-appellees.
Before WISDOM, GOLDBERG and GEE, Circuit Judges.
Rule 18, 5 Cir., Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of the district court is affirmed on the basis of the well-reasoned opinion below. Brown v. Georgia Power Co., 371 F.Supp. 543 (S.D.Ga. 1973). The proper forum for plaintiff's troubling complaints of denial of procedural due process in the state trial court is the appellate courts of Georgia.
Affirmed.