Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Barton Joseph ADAMS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-02-23
Citations: 633 F. App'x 162
Docket Number: No. 15-7550
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Barton Joseph ADAMS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 633
Pages: 162–162

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Barton Joseph ADAMS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-7550.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 19, 2016.
Decided: Feb. 23, 2016.
Barton Joseph Adams, Appellant Pro Se. William J. Ihlenfeld, II, Office of the United States Attorney, Alan McGonigal, Michael D. Stein, Assistant United States Attorneys, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Barton Joseph Adams appeals from the district court's September 23, 2015 order denying 16 of his motions filed in 2014. On appeal, Adams fails to explain how the district court erred in its denial decisions. Accordingly, Adams has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); Wahi v. Charleston Area Med. Ctr., Inc., 562 F.3d 599, 607 (4th Cir.2009); Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n. 4 (4th Cir.2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.