Case Name: Martha M. STEVENSON; James Stevenson, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ETHICON, INCORPORATED; Johnson & Johnson, Defendants-Appellees, and Johnson & Johnson, Inc., Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-11-10
Citations: 670 F. App'x 174
Docket Number: No. 16-1621
Parties: Martha M. STEVENSON; James Stevenson, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ETHICON, INCORPORATED; Johnson & Johnson, Defendants-Appellees, and Johnson & Johnson, Inc., Defendant.
Judges: Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 670
Pages: 174–174

Head Matter:
Martha M. STEVENSON; James Stevenson, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ETHICON, INCORPORATED; Johnson & Johnson, Defendants-Appellees, and Johnson & Johnson, Inc., Defendant.
No. 16-1621
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: November 4, 2016
Decided: November 10, 2016
Tracy W. Houck, Ron Riggle, Houck & Riggle, LLC, Ruston, Louisiana, for Appellants. . David B. Thomas, Daniel R. Higginbotham, Thomas Combs & Spann, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia; Christy Jones, John C. Henegan, Sr., Susana Moore Moldoveanu, Butler Snow, LLP, Ridgeland, Mississippi, for Appellees.
Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Martha M. Stevenson and James Stevenson appeal the district court's orders dismissing this action for failure to timely effect service of process and denying their motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stevenson v. Ethicon, Inc., Nos. 2:12-cv-02700; 2:12-md-02327, 2016 WL 3049501 (S.D. W. Va. Jan. 26, 2016; May 27, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED