Case Name: Mark SHIPLEY, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. MISSOURI MEERSCHAM COMPANY, a corporation, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-11-14
Citations: 910 S.W.2d 770
Docket Number: No. 67284
Parties: Mark SHIPLEY, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. MISSOURI MEERSCHAM COMPANY, a corporation, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before CRAHAN, P.J., and CRANDALL and DOWD, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 910
Pages: 770–770

Head Matter:
Mark SHIPLEY, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. MISSOURI MEERSCHAM COMPANY, a corporation, Defendant/Respondent.
No. 67284.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Nov. 14, 1995.
Richard B. Dempsey, Washington, for appellant.
Donald L. James, Joseph R. Swift, T. Michael Ward, John P. Rahoy, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before CRAHAN, P.J., and CRANDALL and DOWD, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Mark Shipley appeals the trial court's judgment in favor of Missouri Meerschaum Company on his employment discrimination claim against Missouri Meerschaum Company. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).