Case Name: Robin Williams, Appellant, v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1994-04-05
Citations: 160 Misc. 2d 592
Docket Number: 
Parties: Robin Williams, Appellant, v Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 160
Pages: 592–593

Head Matter:
[613 NYS2d 523]
Robin Williams, Appellant, v Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation, Respondent.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
April 5, 1994
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Barry Siskin, New York City, for appellant. Evans, Orr, Pacelli, Norton & Laffan, P. C., New York City, for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order affirmed with $10 costs.
There are issues of fact which require a trial. We note that plaintiff has exclusive knowledge of the key facts while Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation's liability is predicated on the actions of an unknown owner and operator of a hit-and-run vehicle and it must rely in large part on cross-examination of plaintiff at trial.
Scholnick, J. P., Aronin and Chetta, JJ., concur.