Case Name: Edith Antonia SCHWARTZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-03-10
Citations: 421 F. App'x 683
Docket Number: No. 08-74292
Parties: Edith Antonia SCHWARTZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 421
Pages: 683–683

Head Matter:
Edith Antonia SCHWARTZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 08-74292.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 15, 2011.
Filed March 10, 2011.
Ian Silverberg, Esquire, Hardy Law Group, Reno, NV, for Petitioner.
Juria L. Jones, Trial, Edward C. Durant, Luis E. Perez, Senior Litigation Counsel, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Edith Antonia Schwartz, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order denying her motion to reopen proceedings. We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction over Schwartz's contention that the BIA should have tolled the filing deadline for her motion because she failed to raise that issue before the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004) (this court lacks jurisdiction to review contentions not raised before the agency).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.