Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Duala CHAPPELL, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-10-14
Citations: 333 F. App'x 728
Docket Number: No. 08-6736
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Duala CHAPPELL, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 333
Pages: 728–728

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Duala CHAPPELL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-6736.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 29, 2009.
Decided: Oct. 14, 2009.
Duala Chappell, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Bartlett Hudson, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Ap-pellee.
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Duala Chappell appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Chappell, No. 3:95-cr-00017-3-SGW (W.D.Va. Mar. 20, 2009). We deny Chappell's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.