Case Name: Consolidated Edison Solutions, Inc., Respondent, v. Jack Pytluk, Individually and Doing Business as Harp Marketing, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2012-01-31
Citations: 91 A.D.3d 899
Docket Number: 
Parties: Consolidated Edison Solutions, Inc., Respondent, v Jack Pytluk, Individually and Doing Business as Harp Marketing, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 91
Pages: 899–899

Head Matter:
Consolidated Edison Solutions, Inc., Respondent, v Jack Pytluk, Individually and Doing Business as Harp Marketing, Appellant.
[937 NYS2d 596]

Opinion:
Under the particular circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of liability. Rivera, J.P, Dickerson, Eng and Lott, JJ., concur.