Case Name: TIGER et al. v. NOLEN et al.
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1920-05-04
Citations: 78 Okla. 250
Docket Number: No. 9680
Parties: TIGER et al. v. NOLEN et al.
Judges: All the Justices concur.
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 78
Pages: 250–250

Head Matter:
TIGER et al. v. NOLEN et al.
No. 9680
Opinion Filed May 4, 1920.
(Syllabus by the Court.)
India,ns — Inherited Lands — Partition—Jurisdiction.
On July 6, 1909, the district courts of this state had jurisdiction. of an action to partition inherited lands of mixed-blood Indians, including minors, and were authorized to decree a sale of such lands if found to be incapable of partition by the commissioners appointed by said courts.
Error from District Court, Hughes County; Geo. C. Crump, Judge.
Diamond & Sherrow, for plaintiffs in error.
Skinner & Bailey, for defendants in error.
Action by Ewnáh J. Tiger and another against James M. Nolen and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error.
Affirmed.

Opinion:
JOHNSON, J.
It was stipulated in this case as follows :
"The defendants in error filed a demurrer to the petition of the plaintiffs in error, and tapón said demurrer coming on for hearing, the parties having agreed in open court that the sole and only question of law to be determined by the court was whether or not the district court could partition the land of a full-blood Indian inherited by a seven-eighths-blood minor."
This stipulation eliminates from the ease everything, as stated, except the sole question of law, "Whether or not the district court of this state could partition the land of a full-blood Indian inherited by a seven-eighths-blood minor." This court has recently answered that question in the affirmative in the case of Seth Salmon et al. v. Miley Johnson, 78 Okla. 182. in an opinion by Mr. Justice Rainey, decided at the present term (April 6, 1920).
The question of law. decided in said cause is controlling in the instant case, being the identical question herein involved.
Under the rule of law announced in cause No. 9717, and the authorities there cited, it is ordered that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.
All the Justices concur.