Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William F. HORNE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-08-17
Citations: 343 F. App'x 192
Docket Number: No. 08-16004
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William F. HORNE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: KLEINFELD, M. SMITH, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 343
Pages: 192–193

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William F. HORNE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-16004.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 11, 2009.
Filed Aug. 17, 2009.
Curtis Clarence Pett, Esquire, James C. Strong, Robert William Metzler, Supervisory, Gilbert Steven Rothenberg, Esquire, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
William F. Horne, Carson City, NV, pro se.
Before: KLEINFELD, M. SMITH, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
William F. Horne appeals pro se from the district court's order granting the government's petition to enforce two summonses. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for clear error, United States v. Blackman, 72 F.3d 1418, 1422 (9th Cir.1995), and we affirm.
The district court did not clearly err by granting the petition because Horne failed to rebut the government's showing that the summonses were issued in good faith. See Stewart v. United States, 511 F.3d 1251, 1254-55 (9th Cir.2008) (explaining taxpayer's "heavy" burden to show an abuse of process or lack of good faith once government makes prima facie showing that the summons was issued in good faith).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.