Case Name: Farzad SAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROCKWELL HUD SYSTEMS INC., Delaware Corporation; Kaiser Flight Dynamics Inc., a Delaware Corporation, dba Flight Dynamics, Defendants-Appellees; Kambiz Ghahreman, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rockwell Hud Systems Inc.; Kaiser Flight Dynamics Inc., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-07-24
Citations: 44 F. App'x 106
Docket Number: Nos. 01-35015, 01-35016; D.C. Nos. CV-99-01749-KI, CV 00-00077-KI
Parties: Farzad SAM, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. ROCKWELL HUD SYSTEMS INC., Delaware Corporation; Kaiser Flight Dynamics Inc., a Delaware Corporation, dba Flight Dynamics, Defendants—Appellees. Kambiz Ghahreman, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Rockwell Hud Systems Inc.; Kaiser Flight Dynamics Inc., Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 44
Pages: 106–106

Head Matter:
Farzad SAM, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. ROCKWELL HUD SYSTEMS INC., Delaware Corporation; Kaiser Flight Dynamics Inc., a Delaware Corporation, dba Flight Dynamics, Defendants—Appellees. Kambiz Ghahreman, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Rockwell Hud Systems Inc.; Kaiser Flight Dynamics Inc., Defendants—Appellees.
Nos. 01-35015, 01-35016.
D.C. Nos. CV-99-01749-KI, CV 00-00077-KI.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted July 12, 2002.
Decided July 24, 2002.
Before GOODWIN, T.G. NELSON, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
The judgment appealed from is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion granting summary judgment by District Judge King.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.