Case Name: New Amsterdam Import Company, Inc., Appellant, v. L & S Delivery & Transfer Co., Inc., Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1959-02-11
Citations: 17 Misc. 2d 102
Docket Number: 
Parties: New Amsterdam Import Company, Inc., Appellant, v. L & S Delivery & Transfer Co., Inc., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 17
Pages: 102–103

Head Matter:
New Amsterdam Import Company, Inc., Appellant, v. L & S Delivery & Transfer Co., Inc., Respondent.
Supreme Court, Appellate ¡Term, First Department,
February 11, 1959.
Levy & Sonet (Daniel Levy of counsel), for appellant.
Robert F. Mitchell, Jr., for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Defendant's unilateral mistake of fact as to the method of delivery required by the contract was not such as would relieve it of its obligations thereunder, since the plaintiff changed its position in reliance upon the agreement (Abner M. Harper, Inc. v. Newburgh, 159 App. Div. 695).
The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and judg-' ment directed for the plaintiff in the sum of $574.70, with costs.
Concur — Hecht, J. P., Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ.
Judgment reversed, etc.