Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Juan Rivera, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2010-02-18
Citations: 14 N.Y.3d 753
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Juan Rivera, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 14
Pages: 753–754

Head Matter:
[925 NE2d 580, 898 NYS2d 542]
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Juan Rivera, Appellant.
Decided February 18, 2010
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Juan Rivera, appellant pro se.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York City (Timothy C. Stone of counsel), for respondent.
Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer LLP, New York City (Megan P. Davis of counsel), for Appellate Courts Committee of the New York County Lawyers’ Association, amicus curiae.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendant has not demonstrated the absence of a legitimate explanation for his appellate counsel's failure to brief the issue whether his guilty plea should be vacated under People v Catu (4 NY3d 242 [2005]; see People v Borrell, 12 NY3d 365, 369 [2009]; People v Rivera, 71 NY2d 705, 709 [1988]).
Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed in a memorandum.