Case Name: Chalanda GARRETT, Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2016-11-22
Citations: 507 S.W.3d 615
Docket Number: No. ED 103989
Parties: Chalanda GARRETT, Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Respondent.
Judges: Before Angela Turner-Quigless, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Lisa Van Amburg, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 507
Pages: 615–616

Head Matter:
Chalanda GARRETT, Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Respondent.
No. ED 103989
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Filed: November 22, 2016
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied January 10, 2017
Mark D. Hirschfeld, Clayton, MO, for appellant.
Rachel M. Jones, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before Angela Turner-Quigless, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Lisa Van Amburg, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Chalanda Garrett appeals from the circuit court's judgment upholding the administrative revocation of her driving privileges for refusing to submit to a chemical analysis of her breath under Missouri's Implied Consent Law. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the circuit court was supported by substantial evidence, was not against the weight of the evidence, and did not erroneously declare or apply the law. Velluto v. Dir. of Revenue, 383 S.W.3d 14, 17 (Mo. App. E.D. 2012). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).