Case Name: CONWAY v. SHERRON
Court: United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1813-11
Citations: 6 F. Cas. 372
Docket Number: 
Parties: CONWAY v. SHERRON.
Judges: (FITZHUGH, Circuit Judge, not sitting)
Reporter: Federal Cases
Volume: 6
Pages: 372–372

Head Matter:
Case Wo. 3,147.
CONWAY v. SHERRON.
[2 Crunch, C. C. 80.]
Circuit Court, District of Columbia.
Nov. Term, 1813.
Bart Performance of Land Contract,
The taking possession, and cultivating of the land by the vendee, takes the sale out of the statute of frauds.
Bill in equity by the executors of the vendor for a specific execution of a sale of land at auction; averring part performance. Plea, statute of frauds.
E. J. Lee, for plaintiffs,
contended—
1st. That the statute does not apply to goods sold at auction; and that there is no reason for a difference between lands and goods in that respect. It is not necessary that the auctioneer’s authority should be in writing. 1 Sugd. Vend. 57; Simon v. Mo-tivos, 3 Burrows, 1921, 1 W. Bl. 599; Payne v. Cave, 3 Term R. 148; Coles v. Trecothick, 9 Ves. 234, 249; Pow. Cont. 272; Waller v. Hendon, 5 Vin. Abr. 524. The auctioneer is a public officer, like a sheriff or a master in chancery, &c. Law Va. Dec. 22,179G; Duval v. Bibb, 3 Call, 3G2.
2d. That the agreement was executed in part by the plaintiffs’ suffering the defendant to take possession and enjoin the rents and profits, &c., which takes the case out of the statute. Bell v. Andrews, 4 Dali. [4 U. S.] 152; 1 Sugd. Vend. 72; 1 Vern. 363; 1 Ves. 220, 297; 4 Ves. 720; and Argenbright v. Campbell, 3 Hen. & M. 1G1.

Opinion:
THE COURT
(FITZHUGH, Circuit Judge, not sitting)
overruled the plea, on the ground of part execution of the agreement; and at November term, 1814, upon final hearing, decree a specific performance.