Case Name: Krystle Macapagal AGUSTIN, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-11-16
Citations: 487 F. App'x 383
Docket Number: No. 11-71342
Parties: Krystle Macapagal AGUSTIN, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: CANBY, TROTT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 487
Pages: 383–383

Head Matter:
Krystle Macapagal AGUSTIN, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 11-71342.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 13, 2012.
Filed Nov. 16, 2012.
Naoki Sekiya, Esquire, Law Offices of Michael J. Gurfinkel, Glendale, CA, for Petitioner.
Laura M.L. Maroldy, Trial, OIL, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
Before: CANBY, TROTT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Krystle Macapagal Agustín, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge's ("U") decision denying her request for a continuance. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a continuance, Ahmed v. Holder, 569 F.3d 1009, 1012 (9th Cir.2009), and we deny the petition for review.
The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Agustin's request for a continuance where she failed to show good cause. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.29; cf. Ahmed, 569 F.3d at 1012-15 (good cause shown for continuance to await adjudication of 1-140 appeal).
Agustin's request regarding prosecutorial discretion is denied.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.