Case Name: In re Complaint as to the Conduct of TERRY G. SUNDKVIST, Accused
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1999-02-11
Citations: 328 Or. 289
Docket Number: OSB 96-95, 96-96; SC S44566
Parties: In re Complaint as to the Conduct of TERRY G. SUNDKVIST, Accused.
Judges: Before Carson, Chief Justice, and Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Durham, and Kulongoski, Justices.
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 328
Pages: 289–291

Head Matter:
Submitted on the record and brief December 3, 1997,
accused disbarred February 11, 1999
In re Complaint as to the Conduct of TERRY G. SUNDKVIST, Accused.
(OSB 96-95, 96-96; SC S44566)
974 P2d 206
Jane E. Angus, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, Lake Oswego, filed a brief on behalf of the Oregon State Bar.
No appearance contra.
Before Carson, Chief Justice, and Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Durham, and Kulongoski, Justices.
PER CURIAM
Fadeley, J., retired January 31, 1998, and did not participate in this decision. Graber, J., resigned March 31,1998, and did not participate in this decision.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
In this disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar (Bar) charged the accused with violating Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rule (DR) 1-102(A)(2) (engaging in a criminal act that reflects adversely on a lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness to practice law), DR 1-102(A)(3) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), DR 1-103(C) (failure to cooperate), and ORS 9.527(1) (conduct for which the accused would be denied admission to the Bar, if applying) and (4) (wilful deceit or misconduct in the legal profession).
A trial panel of the disciplinary board conducted a hearing on the charges. The accused made no appearance, but admitted the facts on which the Bar based its charges. That trial panel found that the accused had violated each of the disciplinary rules and statutes alleged by the Bar and imposed the sanction of disbarment.
A recitation of the pertinent facts would not benefit the Bar or the public. On de novo review of the record, we conclude that the accused is guilty of each of the Bar's charges and that the appropriate sanction is disbarment.
The accused is disbarred.