Case Name: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, DIVISION OF STATE POLICE, ET AL. v. FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION ET AL.
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1998-12-29
Citations: 247 Conn. 341
Docket Number: SC 15934
Parties: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, DIVISION OF STATE POLICE, ET AL. v. FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION ET AL.
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 247
Pages: 341–342

Head Matter:
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, DIVISION OF STATE POLICE, ET AL. v. FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION ET AL.
(SC 15934)
Callahan, C. J., and Berdon, Palmer, McDonald and Peters, Js.
Argued September 25
officially released December 29, 1998
Victor R. Perpetua, appellate attorney, with whom, on the brief, was Mitchell W. Pearlman, general counsel, for the appellant (named defendant).
AnnE. Lynch, assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, was Richard Blumenthal, attorney general, for the appellees (plaintiffs).

Opinion:
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
These consolidated appeals arise from decisions rendered by the named defendant, the freedom of information commission, in connection with complaints that had been filed with it by the defendant Shirley Vigneri. The plaintiffs, the department of public safety, division of state police, and two of its employees, Gerald Gore and Michael Bochiccio, appealed from those decisions to the trial court pursuant to General Statutes § l-21i (d) and 4-183. The trial court rendered judgment sustaining the plaintiffs' appeal in part.
Although we do not endorse all of the trial court's reasoning, we believe that under the circumstances, the result reached is correct and we affirm the trial court's judgment.
The judgment is affirmed.