Case Name: KLEIN v. METROPOLITAN ST. RY. CO.
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1900-03-09
Citations: 63 N.Y.S. 152
Docket Number: 
Parties: KLEIN v. METROPOLITAN ST. RY. CO.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 63
Pages: 152–153

Head Matter:
KLEIN v. METROPOLITAN ST. RY. CO.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
March 9, 1900.)
Appeal — Verdict— Oonolusivbness.
A verdict based on conflicting evidence is conclusive on appeal.
Appeal from city court of New York, general term.
Action by Joseph Klein against the Metropolitan Street-Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff (61 N. Y. Supp. 1140), defendant appeals.
Affirmed.
Argued before TRUAX, P. J., and DUGRO and SCOTT, JJ.
Henry A. Robinson, for appellant.
Horwitz & Samuels, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
There was a direct conflict of testimony as. to how the accident happened. The question raised by this conflict was submitted to the jury, and with its verdict we cannot interfere.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.