Case Name: Martin P. Plumb, Respondent, v. Richmond Light and Railroad Company, Appellant, Impleaded with. Joseph J. Phillips, Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1920-12
Citations: 194 A.D. 972
Docket Number: 
Parties: Martin P. Plumb, Respondent, v. Richmond Light and Railroad Company, Appellant, Impleaded with. Joseph J. Phillips, Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 194
Pages: 972–973

Head Matter:
Martin P. Plumb, Respondent, v. Richmond Light and Railroad Company, Appellant, Impleaded with. Joseph J. Phillips, Defendant.

Opinion:
Reargument ordered upon the question as to whether or not the judge's charge at folios 493 and 494 of the case correctly stated the law, with reference to the exception taken thereto by defendant's counsel at folios 517 and 518, and ease set down for the January' term of 1921. Jenks, P. J., Rich, Putnam, Blackmar and Kelly, JJ., concur. [See 195 App. Div. -.]