Case Name: George C. MATTHIES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SEYMOUR MANUFACTURING COMPANY et al., Defendants-Appellants; George C. MATTHIES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Earl B. BOIES et al., Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1959-11-24
Citations: 271 F.2d 740
Docket Number: Nos. 284, 285, 321; Dockets 25524, 25525, 25577
Parties: George C. MATTHIES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SEYMOUR MANUFACTURING COMPANY et al., Defendants-Appellants. George C. MATTHIES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Earl B. BOIES et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 271
Pages: 740–741

Head Matter:
George C. MATTHIES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SEYMOUR MANUFACTURING COMPANY et al., Defendants-Appellants. George C. MATTHIES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Earl B. BOIES et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Nos. 284, 285, 321,
Dockets 25524, 25525, 25577.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued Sept. 24, 1959.
Decided Nov. 24, 1959.
Dean Acheson, Charles A. Horsky, and Stanley L. Temko, of Covington & Bur-ling, Washington, D. C., Leo Y. Gaffney, New Britain, Conn., John P. Hodgson, Hartford, Conn., Robert M. Fitzgerald, Litchfield, Conn., John S. Barton, Curtis V. Titus, and A. Reynolds Gordon, Bridgeport, Conn., for George C. Matthies, plaintiff-appellee.
William H. Timbers, Darien, Conn., James William Moore, New Haven, Conn., Howard P. Fink, Rochester, N. Y., Barry H. Garfinkel, New York City, and John F. Spindler, Stamford, Conn., for defendants-appellants Earl B. Boies, H. George Carroll, Raymond E. Hackett, and Francis P. Schiaroli; David Gold-stein and Jacob D. Zeldes, Bridgeport, Conn., for defendant-appellant H. Meade Alcorn, Jr.; and Joseph P. Cooney, Hartford, Conn., for defendant-appellant Seymour Mfg. Co. in opposition.
John K. Holbrook and William E. Mills, Jr., New York City, and William A. Phillips, New Haven, Conn., for defendants-appellants Janet Pouch Redmond and Louise Jerome McMillan in opposition.
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and LUMBARD, WATERMAN, MOORE and FRIENDLY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The petition for reconsideration en banc is denied, 2 Cir., 270 F.2d 365.