Case Name: MICHAEL ARDIS AND DANIEL EILE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. CARLTON THOMAS REED, A/K/A CARLTON REED, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1965-11-08
Citations: 46 N.J. 1
Docket Number: 
Parties: MICHAEL ARDIS AND DANIEL EILE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. CARLTON THOMAS REED, A/K/A CARLTON REED, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 46
Pages: 1–1

Head Matter:
MICHAEL ARDIS AND DANIEL EILE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. CARLTON THOMAS REED, A/K/A CARLTON REED, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Argued October 26, 1965
Decided November 8, 1965.
Mr. Howard A. Goldberger argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. Goldberger, Ostrow, Siegel & Finn, attorneys).
Mr. George P. Moser, Jr. argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Moser, Roveto & McGough, attorneys).

Opinion:
Pee Oueiam.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Collester in the Appellate Division.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Haneman-7.
For reversal — None.