Case Name: Harry Hirshman, Appellant, v. Morris Shidlovshy, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1900-04
Citations: 31 Misc. 759
Docket Number: 
Parties: Harry Hirshman, Appellant, v. Morris Shidlovshy, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 31
Pages: 759–759

Head Matter:
Harry Hirshman, Appellant, v. Morris Shidlovshy, Respondent.
Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan, rendered in favor of the defendant, upon a trial had without a jury.
Carl L. Schurz, for appellant
Eurzman & Frankenheimer (Nathan Ottinger, of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The only question, involved upon the appeal is one of fact. Upon the evidence the justice could have found either way, and having decided in favor of the defendant, we discover no reason for disturbing his conclusion.
Present: Beekmah, P. J., Giegerich and O'Gormas, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.