Case Name: Charles D. BOYD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dr. Charles J. BETO, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1971-08-25
Citations: 447 F.2d 148
Docket Number: No. 71-1470
Parties: Charles D. BOYD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dr. Charles J. BETO, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 447
Pages: 148–148

Head Matter:
Charles D. BOYD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dr. Charles J. BETO, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 71-1470
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 25, 1971.
J. Glenn Turner, Dallas, Tex., for petitioner-appellant.
Charles D. Boyd, pro se.
Crawford C. Martin, Atty. Gen. of Texas, Lonny F. Zwiener, Asst. Atty. Gen., Nola White, First Asst. Atty. Gen., Alfred Walker, Executive Asst. Atty. Gen., Robert C. Flowers, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent-appellee.
Before BELL, AINSWORTH, and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges.
Rule 18, 5 Cir.; Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
This habeas corpus proceeding involving a state prisoner raises evidentiary procedural matters which do not rise to the level of substantial federal constitutional questions. The district court was therefore correct in denying relief.
Affirmed.