Case Name: Edith ROGERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-06-16
Citations: 619 So. 2d 514
Docket Number: No. 92-0285
Parties: Edith ROGERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and WARNER and FARMER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 619
Pages: 514–514

Head Matter:
Edith ROGERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 92-0285.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
June 16, 1993.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Paul E. Petillo, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Edward L. Giles, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We reverse and remand with direction to discharge the defendant. Probable cause did not exist so as to justify the conduct of the four law enforcement officers — guns drawn and handcuffs. There was only founded suspicion for a stop. See Reynolds v. State, 592 So.2d 1082 (Fla.1992).
GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and WARNER and FARMER, JJ., concur.