Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Larnell ECKLES, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-12-19
Citations: 500 F. App'x 260
Docket Number: No. 12-7768
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Larnell ECKLES, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 500
Pages: 260–261

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Larnell ECKLES, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-7768.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 13, 2012.
Decided: Dec. 19, 2012.
William Larnell Eckles, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
William Larnell Eckles, Jr., appeals the district court's order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(C)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Eckles, No. 5:00-cr-00046-RLV-4 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 26, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Although the district court granted Eckles's motion, Eckles contends on appeal that he was entitled to an even further reduction.