Case Name: AMELIA SANTOS, EXECUTRIX, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. ELIZABETH ANDERSON ET AL., APPELLANTS
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1929-05-20
Citations: 106 N.J.L. 596
Docket Number: 
Parties: AMELIA SANTOS, EXECUTRIX, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. ELIZABETH ANDERSON ET AL., APPELLANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 106
Pages: 596–596

Head Matter:
AMELIA SANTOS, EXECUTRIX, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. ELIZABETH ANDERSON ET AL., APPELLANTS.
Submitted October 26, 1928
Decided May 20, 1929.
For the respondent, Irving Siegler.
For the appellants, Michael J. Bruder.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Parker, Kalisch, Campbell, White, Yan Buskirk, McGlennon, Kats, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.