Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eugene MANSFIELD, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-03-02
Citations: 413 F. App'x 679
Docket Number: No. 10-7304
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Eugene MANSFIELD, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 413
Pages: 679–679

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Eugene MANSFIELD, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 10-7304.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 24, 2011.
Decided: March 2, 2011.
Eugene Mansfield, Appellant Pro Se. John W. Stone, Jr., Acting United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina; Robert Michael Hamilton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Eugene Mansfield appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir.2004); United States v. Legree, 205 F.3d 724, 727 (4th Cir.2000). Therefore, we affirm the district court's order for the reasons stated there. See United States v. Mansfield, No. 6:94-cr-00227-1 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 17, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.