Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Enrique TORRES-CHAIREZ, a.k.a. Linio Monsivais-Landero, a.k.a. Enrique Torres, Defendant-Appellant; United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Enrique Torres-Chairez, a.k.a. Linio Monsivais-Landero, a.k.a. Enrique Torres, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-05-27
Citations: 434 F. App'x 715
Docket Number: Nos. 08-10557, 08-10558
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Enrique TORRES-CHAIREZ, a.k.a. Li-nio Monsivais-Landero, a.k.a. Enrique Torres, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Enrique Torres-Chairez, a.k.a. Linio Monsivais-Landero, a.k.a. Enrique Torres, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 434
Pages: 715–716

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Enrique TORRES-CHAIREZ, a.k.a. Li-nio Monsivais-Landero, a.k.a. Enrique Torres, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Enrique Torres-Chairez, a.k.a. Linio Monsivais-Landero, a.k.a. Enrique Torres, Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 08-10557, 08-10558.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 24, 2011.
Filed May 27, 2011.
John Robert Lopez, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee.
Neil Clifford Labarge, Esquire, Law Office of Neil Labarge, Donald MacPherson, The MacPherson Group, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: PREGERSON, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
In these consolidated appeals, Enrique Torres-Chairez appeals from his guilty- plea conviction and 41-month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and from the revocation of his supervised release and eight-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Torres-Chairez's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Pens on v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgments are AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.