Case Name: The New York Board of Fire Underwriters, Respondent, v. A. Foster Higgins et al., Doing Business as Higgins & Cox, Appellants
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1910-05-31
Citations: 198 N.Y. 634
Docket Number: 
Parties: The New York Board of Fire Underwriters, Respondent, v. A. Foster Higgins et al., Doing Business as Higgins & Cox, Appellants.
Judges: Concur: Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscook and Chase, JJ.; Cullen, Ch. J., concurs on the ground that while the marine policies of defendant do not fall within the statute, the automobile policies do.
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 198
Pages: 634–634

Head Matter:
The New York Board of Fire Underwriters, Respondent, v. A. Foster Higgins et al., Doing Business as Higgins & Cox, Appellants.
FT. Y. Bowrd of Fire Underwriters v. Higgins, 130 App. Div. 78, affirmed.
(Argued Hay 13, 1910;
decided May 31, 1910.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 16, 1909, in favor of plaintiff, upon the submission of a controversy, under section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure, as to whether the defendants are liable for a penalty in failing to make return to the plaintiff as to insurance premiums received by them as attorneys in fact of the “ United States Lloyds.”
Archibald Q. Thacher for appellants.
David liumsey and John 8. Sheppard, Jr., for resjiondent.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscook and Chase, JJ.; Cullen, Ch. J., concurs on the ground that while the marine policies of defendant do not fall within the statute, the automobile policies do.