Case Name: CHIMES DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, INC., Petitioner, v. Patricia O. KING, Respondent
Court: District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Decision Date: 2009-07-30
Citations: 977 A.2d 928
Docket Number: No. 06-AA-1003
Parties: CHIMES DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, INC., Petitioner, v. Patricia O. KING, Respondent.
Judges: BEFORE: WASHINGTON*, Chief Judge; RUIZ, REID, GLICKMAN, KRAMER, FISHER*, BLACKBURNE-RIGSBY, THOMPSON, and OBERLY, Associate Judges; KING*, Senior Judge.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 977
Pages: 928–931

Head Matter:
CHIMES DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, INC., Petitioner, v. Patricia O. KING, Respondent.
No. 06-AA-1003.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
July 30, 2009.
BEFORE: WASHINGTON*, Chief Judge; RUIZ, REID, GLICKMAN, KRAMER, FISHER*, BLACKBURNE-RIGSBY, THOMPSON, and OBERLY, Associate Judges; KING*, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
On consideration of respondent's petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, and petitioner's consent motion for leave to file the lodged response, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted and the Clerk is directed to file the lodged response to the petition. It is
FURTHER ORDERED by the merits division * that the petition for rehearing is denied; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for rehearing en banc is denied.
Senior Judge KING would grant the petition for rehearing.
Associate Judges RUIZ, KRAMER, and OBERLY would grant rehearing en banc.