Case Name: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. Sam BANNERMAN, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1990-09-19
Citations: 525 Pa. 264
Docket Number: No. 90 Eastern District Appeal Docket 1986
Parties: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. Sam BANNERMAN, Appellant.
Judges: Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDermott, zappala and papadakos, jj.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 525
Pages: 264–265

Head Matter:
579 A.2d 1295
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. Sam BANNERMAN, Appellant.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued Dec. 12, 1989.
Decided Sept. 19, 1990.
Reargument Denied Nov. 16, 1990.
No. 90 Eastern District Appeal Docket 1986.
Marilyn J. Gelb, Philadelphia, for appellant.
Gaele McLaughlin Barthold, Deputy Dist. Atty., Ronald Eisenberg, Chief, Appeals Div., Hugh Burns, Robert A. Graci, Chief Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDermott, zappala and papadakos, jj.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
In view of the trial court's failure to comply explicitly with the mandate of Commonwealth v. Neely, 522 Pa. 236, 561 A.2d 1 (1989), the verdict and sentence are vacated and the case is remanded for new trial.