Case Name: STUYVESANT INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1979-10-09
Citations: 375 So. 2d 620
Docket Number: No. 79-661
Parties: STUYVESANT INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before PEARSON, KEHOE and SCHWARTZ, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 375
Pages: 620–621

Head Matter:
STUYVESANT INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 79-661.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 9, 1979.
Weiner, Robbins & Tunkey and Alan S. Ross, Miami, for appellant.
Janet Reno, State’s Atty., and John P. Durant, Asst. State’s Atty., for appellee.
Before PEARSON, KEHOE and SCHWARTZ, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant Stuyvesant Insurance Company appeals an order denying its motion to set aside a bond estreature upon the ground that it did not receive notice of the trial date. This position is inconsistent with the record, which shows that, after the failure to produce the defendant, the bonding company admitted fault and obtained an extension of 60 days within which to produce the defendant. See Lake Sarasota, Inc. v. Pan American Surety Co., 140 So.2d 139, 142 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962), for the principle of law that where the record on appeal is thought to be inaccurate, it is the duty of the party concerned to submit and settle the matter in the lower court; otherwise, that party is bound by the recital in the record. Accordingly, the order appealed is affirmed.
Affirmed.