Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Robert REASK, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-10-03
Citations: 28 S.W.3d 459
Docket Number: No. ED 76639
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Robert REASK, Appellant.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, P. J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER, III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 28
Pages: 459–459

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Robert REASK, Appellant.
No. ED 76639.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Oct. 3, 2000.
Lisa M. Stroup, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Andrea L. Mazza, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, P. J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER, III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Robert Reask appeals from his conviction of unlawful use of a weapon. Reask challenges the admission of evidence of uncharged misconduct, use of a photograph during closing argument that was not admitted into evidence at trial, and comments made by the prosecutor during closing argument. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcripts and find no error.
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.
The judgment is affirmed. 84.16(b).