Case Name: Jerrell BRESLIN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1984-09-04
Citations: 456 So. 2d 1201
Docket Number: No. 84-7
Parties: Jerrell BRESLIN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., HUBBART, J., and WINIFRED J. SHARP, Associate Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 456
Pages: 1201–1204

Head Matter:
Jerrell BRESLIN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 84-7.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Sept. 4, 1984.
Rehearing Denied Oct. 31, 1984.
Black & Furci and Marcia Silvers, Miami, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Renee S. Rus-ka, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., HUBBART, J., and WINIFRED J. SHARP, Associate Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We find no error in the adjudication of criminal contempt entered against a criminal defense lawyer as a result of grossly improper remarks made and repeated during a trial despite specific warnings to the contrary given by the trial judge to the attorney both in a previous proceeding and in the instant one. Ward v. State, 354 So.2d 438 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Kleinfeld v. State, 270 So.2d 22 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972), cert. denied, 275 So.2d 251 (Fla.1973); cf. Carroll v. State, 327 So.2d 881 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).
Affirmed.