Case Name: David BRIGHTWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Andrew MOULTRIE, Doctor; John Moss, P. A.; Damon Fayall, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-01-22
Citations: 551 F. App'x 57
Docket Number: No. 13-7373
Parties: David BRIGHTWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Andrew MOULTRIE, Doctor; John Moss, P. A.; Damon Fayall, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 551
Pages: 57–58

Head Matter:
David BRIGHTWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Andrew MOULTRIE, Doctor; John Moss, P. A.; Damon Fayall, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 13-7373.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 16, 2014.
Decided: Jan. 22, 2014.
David Brightwell, Appellant Pro Se. Michelle Jacquelyn Marzullo, Richard P. Seitz, Marks, O’Neill, O’Brien, Doherty & Kelly, P.C., Towson, Maryland, for Appel-lees.
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
David Brightwell appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to the Appellees and dismissing his civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brightwell v. Moul- trie, No. 8:12-cv-01520-DKC, 2018 WL 4495793 (D.Md. Aug. 19, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.