Case Name: MORRIS McDESSEY v. STATE
Court: Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1937-05-10
Citations: 61 Okla. Crim. 345
Docket Number: No. A-9216
Parties: MORRIS McDESSEY v. STATE.
Judges: DAVENPORT, P. J., and BAREFOOT, J., concur.
Reporter: Oklahoma Criminal Reports
Volume: 61
Pages: 345–347

Head Matter:
MORRIS McDESSEY v. STATE.
No. A-9216.
May 10, 1937.
(68 Pac. [2d] 113.)
James C. Mathers and Wm. H. Lewis, for plaintiff in error.
Lewis R. Morris, Co. Atty., and John F. Eberie, Asst. Co. Atty., for the State.

Opinion:
DOYLE, J.
Plaintiff in error, Morris McDessey, was tried and convicted in the district court of Oklahoma county upon an information charging that on the 27th day of February, 1936, in Oklahoma county he committed the crime of attempted burglary in the first degree. On April 20, 1936, the court rendered judgment and he was sentenced to confinement in the state penitentiary at Mc-Alester for the term of five years and the costs. From the judgment, an appeal was duly perfected by filing in this court on October 19, 1936, a petition in error- with case-made attached.
Subsequent to the submission of the cause on the record, the plaintiff in error filed his duly verified motion in this court to- dismiss his appeal.
The Constitution and laws of this state give to every citizen convicted of crime in the courts of this state the right to appeal from any judgment rendered against him in a court of record. It is a privilege granted by the law to persons convicted of crime which they may exercise at their option.
When an appeal has been taken, unless good cause is shown to the contrary, this court has uniformly per mitted the plaintiff in error to dismiss bis appeal at Ms election. Huber v. State, 13 Okla. Cr. 209, 163 Pac. 329; Hancock v. State, 57 Okla. Cr. 329, 48 Pac. (2d) 348.
In the instant case, there is no reason made to appear why the dismissal should not be ordered in compliance with the motion of plaintiff in error.
It is therefore adjudged and ordered that the appeal herein be dismissed and the case remanded to the district court of Oklahoma county. The clerk of said court is directed to spread the mandate and to issue forthwith to the sheriff of said county commitment in accordance with the judgment of said court pronounced on the verdict of the jury.
DAVENPORT, P. J., and BAREFOOT, J., concur.