Case Name: Mary Lord, Suing for Herself as a Stockholder and a Voting Trust Certificate Holder, and All Other Stockholders and Voting Trust Certificate Holders of the Susquehanna Silk Mills, in Like Situation, Who Shall Choose to Make Themselves Party to This Action, Respondent, v. Susquehanna Silk Mills and Others, Defendants, Impleaded with William M. Vermilye and Others, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1940-12-20
Citations: 260 A.D. 1015
Docket Number: 
Parties: Mary Lord, Suing for Herself as a Stockholder and a Voting Trust Certificate Holder, and All Other Stockholders and Voting Trust Certificate Holders of the Susquehanna Silk Mills, in Like Situation, Who Shall Choose to Make Themselves Party to This Action, Respondent, v. Susquehanna Silk Mills and Others, Defendants, Impleaded with William M. Vermilye and Others, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 260
Pages: 1015–1015

Head Matter:
Mary Lord, Suing for Herself as a Stockholder and a Voting Trust Certificate Holder, and All Other Stockholders and Voting Trust Certificate Holders of the Susquehanna Silk Mills, in Like Situation, Who Shall Choose to Make Themselves Party to This Action, Respondent, v. Susquehanna Silk Mills and Others, Defendants, Impleaded with William M. Vermilye and Others, Appellants.

Opinion:
Order unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted. (See Kissel v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois R. R. Co., 126 App. Div. 852; Western R. R. Co. v. Nolan, 48 N. Y. 513; Restatement of the Law of Trusts, § 282.) Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.