Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pablo LUNA-MOTA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-09-18
Citations: 46 F. App'x 510
Docket Number: No. 00-50294; D.C. No. CR-99-01289-GHK
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Pablo LUNA-MOTA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 46
Pages: 510–511

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Pablo LUNA-MOTA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 00-50294.
D.C. No. CR-99-01289-GHK.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 9, 2002 .
Decided Sept. 18, 2002.
Before HUG, O’SCANNLAIN, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Pablo Luna-Mota appeals his conviction by guilty plea and sentence for being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Luna-Mota's attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and a motion to withdraw on the ground that counsel failed to discover any arguable issue on appeal. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable issues. Counsel's motion to withdraw is therefore GRANTED and the judgment is
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.