Case Name: Faulkner v. Baltimore and Ohio Southwestern Railroad Company
Court: Appellate Court of Indiana
Jurisdiction: Indiana
Decision Date: 1909-07-01
Citations: 44 Ind. App. 441
Docket Number: No. 7,097
Parties: Faulkner v. Baltimore and Ohio Southwestern Railroad Company.
Judges: 
Reporter: Indiana Court of Appeals Reports
Volume: 44
Pages: 441–443

Head Matter:
Faulkner v. Baltimore and Ohio Southwestern Railroad Company.
[No. 7,097.
Appeal dismissed, July 1, 1909.
Rehearing denied October 27, 1909.]
1. Appeal. — Dismissal.— Opinion Upon.— Courts.— The Appellate Court may, in its discretion, dismiss an appeal without submitting a written opinion, the motion to dismiss constituting notice of the grounds for such dismissal, p. 442.
2. Appeal. — Transcript.—Error.—An appellant, to be entitled to a reversal, must present a transcript showing an error, the presumption being that the trial court’s action and decision were correct, p. 442.
3. Appeal. — Assignments of Errors. — Transcript.—An appeal will be dismissed where the assignment of errors raises no question presented by the record, p. 443.
4. Appeal.— Transcript.— Cleric’s Certificate.— Where the clerk’s certificate fails to show that the transcript contains a full, true and complete copy of the proceedings in the ease, and it is impossible to tell whether the ruling complained of applied to the motion complained of, or to some other motion, no question is presented thereon for decision, p. 443.
5. Appeal. — Dismissal.—New Appeal. — Where a motion to dismiss an appeal is sustained, and the appellant has time within which to correct the defects in the transcript and to file another appeal, and he fails to do so, he may not complain on a petition for a rehearing- that his right of appeal has been denied, p. 443.
From Jackson Circuit Court; Joseph H. Shea, Judge.
Action by Daily Faulkner against the Baltimore and Ohio Southwestern Railroad Company. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.
Appeal dismissed.
F. W. Wesner, for appellant.
Edward Barton, Robert S. Alcorn, Thomas Honan and McMullen & McMullens, for appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The appeal in this ease is dismissed.