Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shelley R. OSBORN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-12-01
Citations: 357 F. App'x 109
Docket Number: No. 06-30346
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shelley R. OSBORN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, FISHER and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 357
Pages: 109–110

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shelley R. OSBORN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-30346.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Nov. 3, 2009.
Filed Dec. 1, 2009.
Joseph E. Thaggard, Esq., USGF-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Great Falls, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
F. Ron Newbury, Newbury Law Firm, Helena, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, FISHER and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Shelly Osborn appeals from the entry of a criminal forfeiture order seizing her home. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
The district court correctly found that Osborn's petition was time-barred because it was filed 71 days after receiving notice of the preliminary order of forfeiture. 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(2); Fed.R.Crim.P. 32.2(c)(2). Even assuming the district court could waive the time bar for excusa ble neglect under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b), the district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to do so.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.