Case Name: George A. Houseman, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant. (Action No. 1.)
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1915-05
Citations: 169 A.D. 916
Docket Number: 
Parties: George A. Houseman, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant. (Action No. 1.)
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 169
Pages: 916–916

Head Matter:
George A. Houseman, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant. (Action No. 1.)

Opinion:
Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Held, that while the moving affidavits apparently do not state facts upon which an order for an open commission should have been granted, yet, in view of the laches of the defendant and the correspondence between the attorneys for the respective parties read upon the application herein, and the further fact that the commissions have been executed, the order should be affirmed. All concurred.