Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Augustine PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-06-04
Citations: 65 F. App'x 495
Docket Number: No. 03-6244
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Augustine PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 65
Pages: 495–495

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Augustine PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 03-6244.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 29, 2003.
Decided June 4, 2003.
Augustine Perez, Appellant pro se. John Leslie Brownlee, United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Augustine Perez appeals the district court's order dismissing his pleadings which attempted to challenge his convictions through a petition for writ of audita querela and under former Fed. R.Crim. P 35(a). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. - Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Perez, No. CR-90-112-L (W.D.Va. May 16, 2001; Dec. 23, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.