Case Name: William ALBRITTON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1998-03-19
Citations: 709 So. 2d 101
Docket Number: No. 89364
Parties: William ALBRITTON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: KOGAN, C.J., OVERTON, SHAW, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., and GRIMES, Senior Justice, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 709
Pages: 101–101

Head Matter:
William ALBRITTON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 89364.
Supreme Court of Florida.
March 19, 1998.
Rehearing Denied May 13, 1998.
Joseph A. Frein, Orlando, for Petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Kristen L. Davenport, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have for review Albritton v. State, 681 So.2d 759 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996), which conflicts with this Court's recent opinion in King v. State, 681 So.2d 1136 (Fla.1996). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.
In King, we held that where a trial judge determines that a defendant qualifies as a habitual offender but imposes a non-habitual offender sentence of imprisonment followed by probation, upon a subsequent violation of probation by the defendant, the trial judge on resentencing may not impose a habitual offender sentence. 681 So.2d at 1141. Under Rule 3.701(d)(14) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, "[sjentences imposed after revocation of probation or community control must be in accordance with the [sentencing] guidelines." Accordingly, we quash the decision below and remand for proceedings consistent with our opinion in King.
It is so ordered.
KOGAN, C.J., OVERTON, SHAW, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., and GRIMES, Senior Justice, concur.