Case Name: Rigby v. The W. H. Palmer Co.
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1914-10-20
Citations: 91 Ohio St. 371
Docket Number: No. 13959
Parties: Rigby v. The W. H. Palmer Co.
Judges: Nichols, C. J., Shauck, Johnson, Donahue, Wanamaker, Newman and Wilkin, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, New Service
Volume: 91
Pages: 371–372

Head Matter:
No. 13959.
Rigby v. The W. H. Palmer Co.
Decided October 20, 1914.
Error to Circuit Court of Mahoning county.
Messrs. Hine, Kennedy & Manchester, for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Samuel M. Thompson and Mr. Charles Koonce, Jr.,- for defendant in error.

Opinion:
Judgment of the circuit court reversed and that of the common pleas affirmed.
Journal entry: It appearing from the record that the written acceptance sued upon is not an unconditional acceptance but is subject to the conditions written in the order itself, and that the written order was not an unconditional order for the payment of money within the meaning of Section 8231, General Code, it is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the circuit court of Mahoning county is hereby reversed, and the judgment of the common pleas affirmed. — Reporter.
Nichols, C. J., Shauck, Johnson, Donahue, Wanamaker, Newman and Wilkin, JJ., concur.