Case Name: Robert S. NEWMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2008-05-21
Citations: 981 So. 2d 1277
Docket Number: No. 4D08-520
Parties: Robert S. NEWMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: STEVENSON, GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 981
Pages: 1277–1277

Head Matter:
Robert S. NEWMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D08-520.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
May 21, 2008.
Robert S. Newman, Perry, pro se.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Don M. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for ap-pellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant Robert Newman appeals the trial court's order summarily denying his motion for post conviction relief on five grounds. We affirm the trial court's summary denial of ground three of the motion on its merit as appellant's allegations were adequately refuted by the transcript attached to his motion showing the warning given pursuant to Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). However, we reverse the trial court's summary denial of appellant's other claims, 1, 2, 4 and 5, and remand to the trial court to permit appellant to file a facially sufficient motion within the time parameters of rule 3.850, pursuant to Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754 (Fla.2007).
Affirmed in part, Reversed in part, and Remanded.
STEVENSON, GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.