Case Name: William Krown and Dimer Realty Corp., Appellants, v. Marram Home Servicing Corp. and Others, Defendants; Suburban Builders, Inc., John Picone and Henry W. Burt, Inc., Respondents. John Picone, Respondent, v. Marram Home Servicing Corp. and Others, Defendants; William Krown and Dimer Realty Corp., Appellants; Suburban Builders, Inc., and Henry W. Burt, Inc., Respondents. John Picone, Respondent, v. Marram Home Servicing Corp. and Others, Defendants; William Krown and Dimer Realty Corp., Appellants; Suburban Builders, Inc., and Henry W. Burt, Inc., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1942-06-29
Citations: 264 A.D. 900
Docket Number: 
Parties: William Krown and Dimer Realty Corp., Appellants, v. Marram Home Servicing Corp. and Others, Defendants; Suburban Builders, Inc., John Picone and Henry W. Burt, Inc., Respondents. John Picone, Respondent, v. Marram Home Servicing Corp. and Others, Defendants; William Krown and Dimer Realty Corp., Appellants; Suburban Builders, Inc., and Henry W. Burt, Inc., Respondents. John Picone, Respondent, v. Marram Home Servicing Corp. and Others, Defendants; William Krown and Dimer Realty Corp., Appellants; Suburban Builders, Inc., and Henry W. Burt, Inc., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 264
Pages: 900–900

Head Matter:
William Krown and Dimer Realty Corp., Appellants, v. Marram Home Servicing Corp. and Others, Defendants; Suburban Builders, Inc., John Picone and Henry W. Burt, Inc., Respondents. John Picone, Respondent, v. Marram Home Servicing Corp. and Others, Defendants; William Krown and Dimer Realty Corp., Appellants; Suburban Builders, Inc., and Henry W. Burt, Inc., Respondents. John Picone, Respondent, v. Marram Home Servicing Corp. and Others, Defendants; William Krown and Dimer Realty Corp., Appellants; Suburban Builders, Inc., and Henry W. Burt, Inc., Respondents.

Opinion:
Consolidated actions by appellants to foreclose a purchase-money mortgage, and by certain respondents to foreclose mechanics' liens. Judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial ordered, costs to abide the event. The judgment is without a decision. The detail proof is unsatisfactory. In view of the above determination the appeal from order is dismissed, without costs. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.