Case Name: Cynthia Gayle SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Timothy PURNELL, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-08-20
Citations: 475 F. App'x 464
Docket Number: No. 12-1490
Parties: Cynthia Gayle SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Timothy PURNELL, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 475
Pages: 464–465

Head Matter:
Cynthia Gayle SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Timothy PURNELL, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 12-1490.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 16, 2012.
Decided: Aug. 20, 2012.
Cynthia Gayle Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Mikhael David Charnoff, Danny Mark Howell, Courtney South Schorr, Sands Anderson, PC, McLean, Virginia, for Ap-pellee.
Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Cynthia Gayle Smith appeals the district court's orders denying her motion to amend her civil complaint, dismissing the complaint, and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Purnell, No. 1:11-cv-00922-JCC-IDD, 2011 WL 6140868 (E.D. Va. Dec. 9, 2011) & 2012 WL 948411 (Mar. 20, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.