Case Name: PAPIERFABRIK AUGUST KOEHLER AG and Koehler America, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, and Mitsubishi International Corporation, Mitsubishi Hitec Paper Flensburg GMBH, and Mitsubishi Hitec Paper Bielefeld GMBH, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and International Trade Commission, Defendant-Appellee, and Appleton Papers Inc., DefendantAppellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-05-19
Citations: 646 F.3d 904
Docket Number: No. 2010-1147
Parties: PAPIERFABRIK AUGUST KOEHLER AG and Koehler America, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, and Mitsubishi International Corporation, Mitsubishi Hitec Paper Flensburg GMBH, and Mitsubishi Hitec Paper Bielefeld GMBH, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and International Trade Commission, Defendant-Appellee, and Appleton Papers Inc., DefendantAppellee.
Judges: Before RADER, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, LOURIE, BRYSON, GAJARSA, LINN, DYK, PROST, MOORE, O’MALLEY, and REYNA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 646
Pages: 904–910

Head Matter:
PAPIERFABRIK AUGUST KOEHLER AG and Koehler America, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, and Mitsubishi International Corporation, Mitsubishi Hitec Paper Flensburg GMBH, and Mitsubishi Hitec Paper Bielefeld GMBH, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and International Trade Commission, Defendant-Appellee, and Appleton Papers Inc., DefendantAppellee.
No. 2010-1147.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
May 19, 2011.
Mark A. Bernstein, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, of Washington, DC, filed a combined petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc for defendant-appellee International Trade Commission. With him on the petition were James M. Lyons, General Counsel, and Neal J. Reynolds, Assistant General Counsel for Litigation.
Richard P. Ferrin, Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, of Washington, DC, filed a response to the petition for plaintiffs-ap pellants. With him on the response was William Silverman.
Joseph W. Dorn, King & Spalding LLP, of Washington, DC, filed a response to the petition for defendant-appellee Appleton Papers Inc. With him on the response were Ashley C. Parrish and Steven R. Keener.
Before RADER, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, LOURIE, BRYSON, GAJARSA, LINN, DYK, PROST, MOORE, O’MALLEY, and REYNA, Circuit Judges.
REYNA, Circuit Judge, with whom NEWMAN and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges, join, dissents from the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
A combined petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc was filed by Defendant-Appellee, International Trade Commission, and a response thereto was invited by the court and filed by Plaintiffs-Appellants and Defendanb-Appellee, Appleton Papers, Inc.
The petition for panel rehearing was considered by the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition for rehearing en banc and responses were referred to the circuit judges who are authorized to request a poll of whether to rehear the appeal en banc. A poll was requested, taken, and failed.
Upon consideration thereof,
It Is Ordered That-.
(1) The petition of Defendant-Appellee for panel rehearing is denied.
(2) The petition of Defendant-Appellee for rehearing en banc is denied.
(3) The mandate of the court will issue on May 26, 2011.