Case Name: Deborah V. HUBBARD, a/k/a Deborah Videtto Hubbard, a/k/a Deborah Hubbard-Sarvis, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William BYARS, Jr.; Judy Anderson; T. Tyler; D. Foulk, a/k/a Officer Foulks; Sadi Rafi, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-06-30
Citations: 606 F. App'x 114
Docket Number: No. 15-6207
Parties: Deborah V. HUBBARD, a/k/a Deborah Videtto Hubbard, a/k/a Deborah Hubbard-Sarvis, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William BYARS, Jr.; Judy Anderson; T. Tyler; D. Foulk, a/k/a Officer Foulks; Sadi Rafi, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before GREGORY, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 606
Pages: 114–115

Head Matter:
Deborah V. HUBBARD, a/k/a Deborah Videtto Hubbard, a/k/a Deborah Hubbard-Sarvis, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William BYARS, Jr.; Judy Anderson; T. Tyler; D. Foulk, a/k/a Officer Foulks; Sadi Rafi, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15-6207.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 25, 2015.
Decided: June 30, 2015.
Deborah V. Hubbard, Appellant Pro Se. James E. Parham, Jr., Irmo, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before GREGORY, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Deborah V. Hubbard appeals the district court's order accepting the recommenda tion of the magistrate judge and denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hubbard v. Byars, No. 8:14-cv-00038-BHH (D.S.C. Jan. 26, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.