Case Name: Dayton Bar Association v. O'Neal
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1995-05-24
Citations: 72 Ohio St. 3d 234
Docket Number: No. 94-2647
Parties: Dayton Bar Association v. O’Neal.
Judges: Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 72
Pages: 234–235

Head Matter:
Dayton Bar Association v. O’Neal.
[Cite as Dayton Bar Assn. v. O’Neal (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 234.]
(No. 94-2647
Submitted February 7, 1995
Decided May 24, 1995.)
Faruki, Gilliam & Ireland and Paul G. Hollinan, for relator.
Herbert Creech, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Having reviewed the record, we concur in the board's findings that respondent violated DR 6 — 101(A)(2) and (3), and in its recommendation. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of six-months, but this sanction is suspended on the condition that he complete a two-year probation period and that, during this period, no complaints against him have been certified to the board by a probable cause panel. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Moyer, C.J., and Cook, J., dissent.