Case Name: Orville L. FREEMAN et al., Appellants, v. TEXAS RURAL COMMUNITIES, INC., Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1964-02-20
Citations: 330 F.2d 832
Docket Number: No. 17944
Parties: Orville L. FREEMAN et al., Appellants, v. TEXAS RURAL COMMUNITIES, INC., Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 330
Pages: 832–833

Head Matter:
Orville L. FREEMAN et al., Appellants, v. TEXAS RURAL COMMUNITIES, INC., Appellee.
No. 17944.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued Jan. 28, 1964.
Decided Feb. 20, 1964.
Mr. Frederick B. Abramson, Attorney, Department of Justice, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, and Mr. Morton Hollander, Attorney, Department of Justice, with whom Asst. Atty. Gen., John W. Douglas, and Mr. David C. Acheson, U. S. Atty., were on the brief, for appellants. Mr. Frank Q. Nebeker, Asst. U. S. Atty., also entered an appearance for appellants.
Mr. Bryce Rea, Jr., Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Thomas M. Knebel, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellee.
Before Edgerton, Senior Circuit Judge, and Fahy and Bastían, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
As the case was presented to the trial court the question is whether appellants, the Secretary of Agriculture and the Administrator of the Farmers Home Administration, have authority to preclude Texas Rural Communities, Inc., appellee, from expending for annual administrative purposes an amount which appel lants think excessive but which is well within 3 percent of the book value of the assets returned by appellants to appellee under the Rural Rehabilitation Corporation Trust Liquidation Act, 64 Stat. 98 (1950), 40 U.S.C. § 440 (1958). The Act provides that the agency to which the assets are returned, here appellee, shall agree "that not to exceed 3 per centum of the book value of [its] assets will be expended for administrative purposes during any year, without the approval of the Secretary of Agriculture."
As we construe the statutory authority of appellants it does not authorize them to require a reduction of administrative expenses below the 3 per centum level when there is only a difference of opinion as to the amount needed for administrative purposes. In these circumstances approval by appellants would be necessary only if the percentage exceeded 3 per centum.
Affirmed.