Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Alexis Gomez JAIMES, also known as Alexis Jaimes, also known as Alex Gomez-Jiminez, also known as Alexis Gomez-Jaimes, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-08-04
Citations: 435 F. App'x 389
Docket Number: No. 10-20702
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Alexis Gomez JAIMES, also known as Alexis Jaimes, also known as Alex Gomez-Jiminez, also known as Alexis Gomez-Jaimes, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING, JOLLY, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 435
Pages: 389–389

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Alexis Gomez JAIMES, also known as Alexis Jaimes, also known as Alex Gomez-Jiminez, also known as Alexis Gomez-Jaimes, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-20702
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 4, 2011.
James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Laura Fletcher Leavitt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before KING, JOLLY, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Alexis Gomez Jaimes has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Jaimes has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.