Case Name: Dayton Bar Association v. Wiechel
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1991-12-18
Citations: 62 Ohio St. 3d 227
Docket Number: No. 91-1255
Parties: Dayton Bar Association v. Wiechel.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 62
Pages: 227–228

Head Matter:
Dayton Bar Association v. Wiechel.
[Cite as Dayton Bar Assn. v. Wiechel (1991), 62 Ohio St.3d 227.]
(No. 91-1255
Submitted September 11, 1991
Decided December 18, 1991.)
Richard S. Sutton, for relator.
David C. Greer, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We agree that respondent violated DR 6-101(A)(3) as found by the board. We also concur in the board's recommendation and hereby publicly reprimand respondent. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.