Case Name: Harry J. BOOTHE et al., Petitioners, v. Houston PYLES et al., Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1968-10-23
Citations: 215 So. 2d 1
Docket Number: No. 37709
Parties: Harry J. BOOTHE et al., Petitioners, v. Houston PYLES et al., Respondents.
Judges: ROBERTS, Acting Chief Justice, and DREW, THORNAL, ERVIN and HOPPING, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 215
Pages: 1–1

Head Matter:
Harry J. BOOTHE et al., Petitioners, v. Houston PYLES et al., Respondents.
No. 37709.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Oct. 23, 1968.
Rehearing Denied Nov. 18, 1968.
John J. O’Riorden, of Dart, Bell & Dickinson, Sarasota, for petitioners.
Edward H. Hurt, Orlando, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date June 10, 1968.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, records and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition for certiorari is therefore denied. Attorney's fee in the amount of $250.00 is awarded to respondent-claimant's attorney.
It is so ordered.
ROBERTS, Acting Chief Justice, and DREW, THORNAL, ERVIN and HOPPING, JJ., concur.