Case Name: Stephanie G. PIERCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Elizabeth MEACHAM, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-08-30
Citations: 17 F. App'x 710
Docket Number: No. 01-35057; D.C. No. CV-00-01314-OMP
Parties: Stephanie G. PIERCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Elizabeth MEACHAM, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 17
Pages: 710–711

Head Matter:
Stephanie G. PIERCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Elizabeth MEACHAM, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 01-35057.
D.C. No. CV-00-01314-OMP.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 13, 2001.
Decided Aug. 30, 2001.
Before HAWKINS, TASHIMA, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument and de nies Pierce’s request for oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Stephanie G. Pierce appeals pro se from the district court's order quashing the summons mistakenly issued after the dismissal of her action. Because the action had already been dismissed, Pierce's appeal is moot.
On June 1, 2001, in appeal number 00-36042, this court affirmed the underlying judgment. We have not considered any issues raised in the parties' briefs that address the underlying judgment at issue in that appeal.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.