Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Daniel Sherman, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2013-10-16
Citations: 110 A.D.3d 929
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Daniel Sherman, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 110
Pages: 929–929

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Daniel Sherman, Appellant.
[972 NYS2d 914]

Opinion:
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hollie, J.), rendered November 23, 2010, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
In fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]; People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342 [2007]), we nevertheless accord great deference to the factfinder's opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor (see People v Mateo, 2 NY3d 383, 410 [2004], cert denied 542 US 946 [2004]; People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]).
The defendant's remaining contention is without merit (see People v Handy, 20 NY3d 663, 669 [2013]). Rivera, J.P., Lott, Sgroi and Miller, JJ., concur.