Case Name: Southern Casualty Company v. J. W. Vatter
Court: Supreme Court of Texas
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1925-12-02
Citations: 115 Tex. 148
Docket Number: Application No. 14356
Parties: Southern Casualty Company v. J. W. Vatter.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Reports
Volume: 115
Pages: 148–149

Head Matter:
DECEMBER, 1925
Southern Casualty Company v. J. W. Vatter.
Application No. 14356.
Decided December 2, 1925.
(278 S. W. 177).
Howth, Adams & Hart, for petitioners,
cited: Security Trust & Life Ins. Co. v. Stuart, 163 S. W., 396; Quanah A. & P. Ry. Co. v. Drummond, 147 S. W., 728; Henry v. Vaughan, 103 S. W., 192; Newman v. Norris Imp. Co., 147 S. W., 725; Geiger v. Lavin, 110 N. Y., 203; Malsby v. Gamble (Fla.), 54 So., 766; Frorer v. Landon & Mickelberry, 130 Ill. App., 93; McDonald v. Lehigh Valley Ry. Co., 191 Ill. App., 628; Freeman v. Brewster, 93 Ga., 648, 21 S. E., 595; State v. Waite, 101 Iowa, 377, 70 S. W., 595; Rothschild v. Schwartz, 59 N. Y. S., 527; Bridgeport Hdw. Mfg. Co. v. Bouniol, 89 Conn., 254, 93 Atl., 674.

Opinion:
Per Curiam :
This case' is dismissed for want of jurisdiction on the authorities cited by the Court of Civil Appeals in its opinion.
The brief of the plaintiff in error in the Court of Civil Appeals contained no statement with proper reference to the pages of the statement of facts showing whether the grounds of objection to the evidence discussed by the Court of Civil Appeals were true. It is therefore unnecessary for this Court to consider whether error would have been shown had the brief of plaintiff in error disclosed the truth of the grounds of its objections.