Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph Mosh CURLEY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-07-23
Citations: 329 F. App'x 746
Docket Number: No. 08-10329
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph Mosh CURLEY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 329
Pages: 746–746

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph Mosh CURLEY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-10329.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 14, 2009.
Filed July 23, 2009.
Darcy A. Cerow, Esquire, Assistant U.S., USPX-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Milagros Anais Cisneros, Assistant Federal Public Defender, FPDAZ-Federal Public Defender’s Office, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Joseph Mosh Curley appeals from the 42-month sentence imposed following revocation of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Curley contends that the district court erred by failing to articulate sufficiently compelling reasons for imposing a sentence substantially above the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines range. This contention lacks merit. See United States v. Leonard, 483 F.3d 635, 637 (9th Cir.2007); see also United States v. Simtob, 485 F.3d 1058, 1062-63 (9th Cir.2007).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.