Case Name: Crisfield, Supervisor, Respondent, v. Murdock et al., Respondents, (Hyland et al., Appellants.)
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1892-06
Citations: 20 N.Y.S. 269
Docket Number: 
Parties: Crisfield, Supervisor, Respondent, v. Murdock et al., Respondents, (Hyland et al., Appellants.)
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 20
Pages: 269–269

Head Matter:
Crisfield, Supervisor, Respondent, v. Murdock et al., Respondents, (Hyland et al., Appellants.)
(Supreme Court, General Term, Fifth Department.
June, 1892.)
Action by James Crisfield as supervisor of the town of North Dansville against James Murdock and others.

Opinion:
No opinion. Order appealed from affirmed, with §10 costs and disbursements. For former report, see 8 N. Y. Supp. 593.