Case Name: Cuyahoga County Bar Association v. Rubino
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2000-01-05
Citations: 87 Ohio St. 3d 466
Docket Number: No. 99-1560
Parties: Cuyahoga County Bar Association v. Rubino.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 87
Pages: 466–467

Head Matter:
Cuyahoga County Bar Association v. Rubino.
[Cite as Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Rubino (2000), 87 Ohio St.3d 466.]
(No. 99-1560
Submitted October 12, 1999
Decided January 5, 2000.)
Mary Ann Rini, Joan M. Litzow and John D. Sutula, for relator.
Carl C. Monastra, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We adopt the findings, conclusion, and recommendation of the board. An attorney is required to cooperate with a disciplinary investigation even when the subject of the investigation is himself. Lake Cty. Bar Assn. v. Vala (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 57, 59, 693 N.E.2d 1083, 1084. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs are taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.