Case Name: Ronald E. ROGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DESA INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant, and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., Lowe's Home Centers, Inc., and Northern Tool & Equipment Company, Inc., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-06-01
Citations: 135 F. App'x 426
Docket Number: No. 02-1247
Parties: Ronald E. ROGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DESA INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant, and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., Lowe’s Home Centers, Inc., and Northern Tool & Equipment Company, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Bankruptcy Reporter
Volume: 332
Pages: 426–427

Head Matter:
Ronald E. ROGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DESA INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant, and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., Lowe’s Home Centers, Inc., and Northern Tool & Equipment Company, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 02-1247.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
June 1, 2005.

Opinion:
ON MOTION
PROST, Circuit Judge.
ORDER
Ronald E. Rogers moves to reinstate his appeal against Home Depot USA, Inc., Lowe's Home Centers, Inc., and Northern Tool & Equipment Company, Inc. in light of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware's recent order confirming a reorganization plan for DESA International and entry of a permanent injunction barring prosecution of any action against DESA. Rogers states that bankruptcy counsel for DESA does not oppose. Non-bankruptcy counsel for DESA, Home Depot, Lowe's, and Northern Tool (cohectively DESA) oppose. Rogers replies.
Before dismissing this appeal for the convenience of the court in view of the length of the bankruptcy proceedings involving DESA, we stayed the appeal against all of the defendants. In exercising our discretion to stay the appeal for all parties, we noted that DESA owed a duty to indemnify the other defendants and, thus, allowing the appeal to continue against any of the defendants could threaten DESA's assets.
We now conclude that in light of the bankruptcy court's injunction prohibiting actions against DESA and the likely length of the continuing DESA bankruptcy proceedings, reinstatement is warranted and the appeal should proceed against the non-debtor defendants-appellees. See Seiko Epson Corp. v. Nu-Kote Int'l, Inc., 190 F.3d 1360, 1364 (Fed.Cir.1999) ("In cases involving multiple parties ., the courts have 'disaggregated' the proceedings so that claims against co-defendants who are not under the protection of the bankruptcy court may go forward[.]").
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) Rogers' motion to reinstate his appeal against Home Depot, Lowe's, and Northern Tool is reinstated.
(2) Rogers' replacement brief is due within 60 days of the date of filing of this order.
(3) The revised official caption is reflected above.