Case Name: Nathan E. JACOBS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mr. BERRIOS, Unit Manager; Mr. Vialapanda, Unit Manager; Mr. Whalen, Case Manager, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-06-23
Citations: 667 F. App'x 39
Docket Number: No. 16-6101
Parties: Nathan E. JACOBS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mr. BERRIOS, Unit Manager; Mr. Vialapanda, Unit Manager; Mr. Whalen, Case Manager, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 667
Pages: 39–40

Head Matter:
Nathan E. JACOBS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mr. BERRIOS, Unit Manager; Mr. Vialapanda, Unit Manager; Mr. Whalen, Case Manager, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-6101
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 21, 2016
Decided: June 23, 2016
Nathan E. Jacobs, Appellant Pro Se.
Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Nathan E. Jacobs appeals the district court's order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil action without prejudice. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Jacobs' informal brief does not challenge the district court's dispositive reasoning, Jacobs has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED