Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joel Stanley DREYER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-01-07
Citations: 705 F.3d 951
Docket Number: No. 10-50631
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joel Stanley DREYER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: REINHARDT, WARDLAW, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 705
Pages: 951–973

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joel Stanley DREYER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-50631.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Feb. 8, 2012.
Filed Jan. 7, 2013.
Pamela O’Leary Tower (argued), Ken-wood, CA, Roger J. Rosen, Los Angeles, CA, for the appellant.
Antoine F. Raphael (argued), Assistant United States Attorney, Andre Birotte Jr., United States Attorney, Riverside, CA, for the appellee.'
Before: REINHARDT, WARDLAW, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
The opinion and dissent filed August 21, 2012 are withdrawn. A superseding opinion and dissent was circulated to the Court on October 12, 2012 and is being filed concurrently with this order.
After the superseding opinion and dissent was circulated, a judge sua sponte requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Although no petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc was filed, the parties were given notice of the superseding opinion and dissent and permitted the opportunity to state their positions on whether the matter should be reheard en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the non-recused active judges in favor of en banc reconsideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
No future petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc will be entertained. The clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith.
Judge Callahan would have the mandate issue after seven days as generally provided by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 41(b).