Case Name: Christopher KERR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2005-02-22
Citations: 893 So. 2d 705
Docket Number: No. 1D04-4141
Parties: Christopher KERR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: WOLF, C.J., DAVIS and BROWNING, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 893
Pages: 705–706

Head Matter:
Christopher KERR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D04-4141.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Feb. 22, 2005.
Appellant, pro se.
Charlie Crist, Attorney General; Thomas D. Winokur, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellant challenges the trial court's order summarily denying his motion alleging an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Because the appellant has stated a facially sufficient claim that he is entitled to resentencing pursuant to Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000), on Count II for robbery with a firearm, we reverse and remand for the trial court to reconsider this claim. His claim regarding Count I is without merit. See § 921.001(4)(b)2., Fla. Stat. (1995).
AFFIRMED IN PART AND REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART.
WOLF, C.J., DAVIS and BROWNING, JJ., concur.