Case Name: Jo Ann HARRIG, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-03-28
Citations: 6 F. App'x 645
Docket Number: No. 00-70639; R.R.B. No. WA-506-24-9369
Parties: Jo Ann HARRIG, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent.
Judges: Before WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 6
Pages: 645–646

Head Matter:
Jo Ann HARRIG, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent.
No. 00-70639. R.R.B. No. WA-[ XXX-XX-XXXX ].
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 12, 2001.
Decided March 28, 2001.
Before WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Jo Ann Harrig petitions pro se for review of the Railroad Retirement Board's ("RRB") decision, affirming the hearing officer's computation of her widow's annuity under the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974, 45 U.S.C. § 231.
We will not set aside a decision of the RRB "if it is supported by substantial evidence, is not arbitrary and has a reasonable basis in law." Calderon v. United States R.R. Ret. Bd., 780 F.2d 812, 813 (9th Cir.1986) (citation omitted).
We have reviewed the record and the RRB's decision and conclude that it is supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.