Case Name: Sidney WYLIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. McDERMOTT, Officer, I/O, Watts, Officer, I/O, Riehi, Officer, I/O, Cicero, Officer, I/O, Degrand, Officer, I/O, John Ambrogio, Police Chief, I/O, Dolan, Officer, I/O, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-03-12
Citations: 31 F. App'x 737
Docket Number: Docket No. 00-0081
Parties: Sidney WYLIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. McDERMOTT, Officer, I/O, Watts, Officer, I/O, Riehi, Officer, I/O, Cicero, Officer, I/O, Degrand, Officer, I/O, John Ambrogio, Police Chief, I/O, Dolan, Officer, I/O, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 31
Pages: 737–737

Head Matter:
Sidney WYLIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. McDERMOTT, Officer, I/O, Watts, Officer, I/O, Riehi, Officer, I/O, Cicero, Officer, I/O, Degrand, Officer, I/O, John Ambrogio, Police Chief, I/O, Dolan, Officer, I/O, Defendants-Appellees.
Docket No. 00-0081.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
March 12, 2002.
Sidney Wylie, New Haven, CT, pro se, for Appellant.
John B. Farley, (Erik J. Ness, on the brief), Halloran & Sage LLP, Hartford, CT, for Appellee.
Present LEVAL and CALABRESE, Circuit Judges, and DEARIE, District Judge.
The Honorable Raymond J. Dearie of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
SUMMARY ORDER
ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.
Plaintiff Sidney Wylie appeals from the March 6, 2000 order of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut granting summary judgment to defendants because the complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Wylie's suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleged violations of his rights under the 4th, 8th and 14th Amendments, as well as the Americans with Disabilities Act, on the theory that the police officers who apprehended him after his commission of a crime improperly failed to prevent a police search dog from biting him.
We affirm the dismissal of his claims for substantially the reasons given by the district court.