Case Name: William Carl YORK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, US, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-12-21
Citations: 707 F. App'x 132
Docket Number: No. 17-2280
Parties: William Carl YORK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, US, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 707
Pages: 132–132

Head Matter:
William Carl YORK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, US, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 17-2280
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: December 19, 2017
Decided: December 21, 2017
William C. York, Appellant Pro Se. Rudy E. Renfer, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
William C. York appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil complaint without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to exhaust administrative remedies. On appeal, we con-fíne our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because York's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, York has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED