Case Name: Rodney HARVEY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2014-02-25
Citations: 421 S.W.3d 584
Docket Number: No. ED 100130
Parties: Rodney HARVEY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before LISA S. VAN AMBURG, P.J., PATRICIA L. COHEN, J„ and PHILIP M. HESS, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 421
Pages: 584–584

Head Matter:
Rodney HARVEY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 100130.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Feb. 25, 2014.
Lisa M. Stroup, Missouri Public Defenders Office, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Karen L. Kramer, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before LISA S. VAN AMBURG, P.J., PATRICIA L. COHEN, J„ and PHILIP M. HESS, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Rodney Harvey appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his amended Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Harvey contends that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to call potential witnesses at trial and failing to object to the State's cross-examination concerning his prior convictions. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying post-conviction relief. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for the decision.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).