Case Name: SEARS TERMITE AND PEST CONTROL, INC., Appellant, v. David ARNOLD, individually and d/b/a Diamond Termite & Pest Control and Gary Atchey, individually and as agent for Diamond Termite & Pest Control, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1999-10-06
Citations: 743 So. 2d 597
Docket Number: No. 99-1639
Parties: SEARS TERMITE AND PEST CONTROL, INC., Appellant, v. David ARNOLD, individually and d/b/a Diamond Termite & Pest Control and Gary Atchey, individually and as agent for Diamond Termite & Pest Control, Appellees.
Judges: BARFIELD, C.J., KAHN and DAVIS, JJ., CONCUR.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 743
Pages: 597–598

Head Matter:
SEARS TERMITE AND PEST CONTROL, INC., Appellant, v. David ARNOLD, individually and d/b/a Diamond Termite & Pest Control and Gary Atchey, individually and as agent for Diamond Termite & Pest Control, Appellees.
No. 99-1639.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Oct. 6, 1999.
Allen J. McKenna, Arthur R. Brown, Jr., and Jason C. Black of Garwood, McKenna, McKenna & Wolf, Orlando, for appellant.
Nickolas G. Petersen, Shalimar, for ap-pellees.

Opinion:
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
PER CURIAM.
Appellant's motion for rehearing is granted and this court's opinion of July 9, 1999, is withdrawn.
On March 17, 1999, the trial court entered an order which dismissed the complaint of plaintiff Sears with prejudice as to defendants Arnold and Atchey, and without prejudice to plaintiffs right to amend its complaint as to defendant Diamond Pest Control. Appellant/plaintiff has appealed that order. However, previously the trial court had denied a request for temporary injunction and the plaintiff appealed that order in this court's Case No. 98-4715. The nonfinal appeal was pending before this court at the time the order here on appeal was entered. The trial court lacked jurisdiction to enter the partial final judgment of March 17, 1999. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.110(k) and 9.130(f). The order of March 17, 1999, is hereby quashed as having been entered by the trial court in the absence of jurisdiction and as the order here on appeal therefore no longer in effect, this appeal is dismissed.
DISMISSED.
BARFIELD, C.J., KAHN and DAVIS, JJ., CONCUR.