Case Name: Alonzo Israel VALENZUELA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-01-31
Citations: 467 F. App'x 691
Docket Number: No. 08-73333
Parties: Alonzo Israel VALENZUELA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 467
Pages: 691–692

Head Matter:
Alonzo Israel VALENZUELA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 08-73333.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Feb. 11, 2011.
Filed Jan. 31, 2012.
Robert Francis Jacobs, Esquire, Jacobs & Vega, PLC, Santa Fe Springs, CA, for Petitioner.
Carol Federighi, Esquire, Senior Litigation Counsel, Ilissa M. Gould, Trial, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
Before: TASHIMA and FISHER, Circuit Judges, and WOLF, District Judge.
The Honorable Mark L. Wolf, Chief United States District Judge for the District of Massachusetts, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
ORDER
The government's unopposed motion for remand is granted so that the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") can reconsider its July 2, 2008, decision denying petitioner's application for a waiver under former § 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, in light of Judulamg v. Holder, — U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 476, 181 L.Ed.2d 449 (2011). The memorandum disposition filed March 15, 2011, 421 Fed. Appx. 745, is vacated. Petitioner's petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en bane is denied, as moot.
REMANDED to the BIA. No costs.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.