Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Casey Dale MAYER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-03-16
Citations: 560 F.3d 948
Docket Number: No. 07-30274
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Casey Dale MAYER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: RICHARD C. TALLMAN, RICHARD R. CLIFTON, and N. RANDY SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 560
Pages: 948–964

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Casey Dale MAYER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-30274.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted May 5, 2008.
Filed March 16, 2009.
Craig E. Weinerman, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Eugene, OR, for the defendant-appellant.
Frank R. Papagni, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Eugene, OR, for the plaintiff-appellee.
Before: RICHARD C. TALLMAN, RICHARD R. CLIFTON, and N. RANDY SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Order; Dissent to Order by Chief Judge KOZINKI; Opinion by
N.R. SMITH.
ORDER
The opinion in the above-captioned matter filed on June 30, 2008, and published at 530 F.3d 1099, is WITHDRAWN. The superseding opinion shall be filed concurrently with this order.
Having made the foregoing amendments to the opinion, all judges on the panel have voted to deny Defendant/Appellee's Petition for Panel Rehearing, and so that petition is DENIED.
The full court has been advised of Defendant/Appellee's Petition for Rehearing En Banc, and a judge of this court requested a vote on whether this case should be reheard en banc; however, a majority of the active judges did not vote in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. RApp. P. 35. Accordingly, the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is also DENIED.