Case Name: Carl CREWS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. S&S SERVICE CENTER INC., trading as Woodbridge Public Auto Auction, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-07-06
Citations: 474 F. App'x 370
Docket Number: No. 12-1263
Parties: Carl CREWS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. S&S SERVICE CENTER INC., trading as Woodbridge Public Auto Auction, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 474
Pages: 370–370

Head Matter:
Carl CREWS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. S&S SERVICE CENTER INC., trading as Woodbridge Public Auto Auction, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 12-1263.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 29, 2012.
Decided: July 6, 2012.
Carl Crews, Appellant Pro Se. James Douglas Cuthbertson, Leclair Ryan, PC, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Carl Crews appeals the district court's order dismissing his Federal Arbitration Act complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Crews v. S&S Serv. Ctr. Inc., 848 F.Supp.2d 595, 2012 WL 253095 (E.D.Va.2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.