Case Name: GAYMAN, County Treasurer, et al. v. THOMPSON
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1916-10-10
Citations: 58 Okla. 496
Docket Number: No. 7592
Parties: GAYMAN, County Treasurer, et al. v. THOMPSON.
Judges: SHARP, HARDY, and TURNER, JJ„ concur; KANE, C. J., not participating.
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 58
Pages: 496–497

Head Matter:
GAYMAN, County Treasurer, et al. v. THOMPSON.
No. 7592.
Opinion Filed October 10, 1916.
(161 Pac. 1056.)
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS. Same as syllabus in ease of Gayman, County Treasurer, et al. v. Mullen, ante, p. 477.
(Syllabus by the Court.)
■ Error from District Court, Lincoln County; Chas. B. Wilson, Jr., Judge.
Action by G. L. Thompson against John J. Gayman,, County Treasurer, and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.
Reversed and remanded, with instructions to dismiss petition.
John J. Davis and Grant Stanley, for plaintiffs in error.
Erwin & Erwin, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
THACKER, J.
The plaintiffs in error will be designated as defendants, and the defendant in error as plaintiff, in accord with their respective titles in the trial court.
This is an action by plaintiff against defendants to vacate and set aside a special assessment of $400, based upon a finding of a drainage benefit, and to perpetually enjoin the collection of the same against his northeast quarter () of the southeast quarter (14) of section twenty-one (21), in township fourteen (14) north, of range two (2) eq,st of the Indian meridian in Lincoln county, Qkla., as a part of drainage district No. 1, of said county. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, the defendants bring the case here for review.
Except as to the real property affected and the owner of the same, this case is practically identical in the facts thereof and precisely identical in the questions presented for decision with the .case of John J. Gayman, County Treasurer, et al. v. Mullen, ante, p. 477, 161 Pac. 1051, decided at this time. The opinion and syllabus in the last-mentioned case is adopted as the opinion and syllabus in this case.
The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded, with instructions to dismiss plaintiff's petition.
SHARP, HARDY, and TURNER, JJ" concur; KANE, C. J., not participating.