Case Name: WRIGHT'S ESTATE v. WATERBURY. In re WRIGHT
Court: Louisiana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1919-12-03
Citations: 146 La. 49
Docket Number: No. 23822
Parties: WRIGHT’S ESTATE v. WATERBURY. In re WRIGHT.
Judges: 
Reporter: Louisiana Reports
Volume: 146
Pages: 49–49

Head Matter:
(83 South. 374)
No. 23822.
WRIGHT’S ESTATE v. WATERBURY. In re WRIGHT.
(Dec. 3, 1919.)
Application for writs of mandamus and prohibition by Miss Maggie Wright, agent, against the District Judge.
Rule made absolute, and the District Judge directed to recognize and respect the right of relatrix to be represented in court by the attorney in fact appointed by her.
Charles J. Mundy, of Thibodaux, for relatrix.

Opinion:
O'NIELL, J.
The issue presented in this mandamus proceeding is the same as in the case of Levi Brown v. Treville Guillot (No. 23809) ante, p. 46, 83 South. 373, decided today.
The district judge denies the right of rela-trix to be represented in court by an attorney in fact, in a suit in which she is plaintiff and appellee' in the district court.
Eor the reasons assigned in the case of Brown v. Guillot (No. 23809) decided to-day, the rule issued herein is now made absolute, and the district judge is directed to recognize and respect the right of relatrix to be represented in court by the attorney in fact appointed by her.