Case Name: LYNNEBROOK & WOODBROOK ASSOCIATES and Dack Realty Associates, v. BOROUGH OF MILLERSVILLE and Judith L. Landis and John Orlando, Petition of Lynnebrook & Woodbrook Associates, Dack Realty Associates, Judith L. Landis and John Orlando
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1999-03-29
Citations: 558 Pa. 564
Docket Number: Petition No. 756 M.D. Alloc. Dkt. 1996
Parties: LYNNEBROOK & WOODBROOK ASSOCIATES and Dack Realty Associates, v. BOROUGH OF MILLERSVILLE and Judith L. Landis and John Orlando, Petition of Lynnebrook & Woodbrook Associates, Dack Realty Associates, Judith L. Landis and John Orlando.
Judges: 
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 558
Pages: 564–565

Head Matter:
738 A.2d 993
LYNNEBROOK & WOODBROOK ASSOCIATES and Dack Realty Associates, v. BOROUGH OF MILLERSVILLE and Judith L. Landis and John Orlando, Petition of Lynnebrook & Woodbrook Associates, Dack Realty Associates, Judith L. Landis and John Orlando.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
March 29, 1999.
David E. Wagenseller, III, Lancaster, for petitioner.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
AND NOW, this 29th day of March, 1999, we GRANT the Petition for Allowance of Appeal LIMITED to the following issues:
Whether the Supreme Court should let stand a decision that allows a developer to use a road on someone else's property to satisfy subdivision requirements, without even making the owner of that road a party to his subdivision request. Whether the Supreme Court should let stand a decision which contradicts a 1972 decision of the Commonwealth Court regarding who must be joined as a party in a subdivision matter and deprives a property owner of due process by not requiring personal notice.