Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Miguel ABUNDEZ-CHAVEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-04-20
Citations: 322 F. App'x 555
Docket Number: No. 07-10609
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Miguel ABUNDEZ-CHAVEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: GRABER, GOULD, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 322
Pages: 555–555

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Miguel ABUNDEZ-CHAVEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-10609.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 13, 2009.
Filed April 20, 2009.
Angela W. Woolridge, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Thomas F. Jacobs, Esq., Law Offices of Thomas Jacobs, Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: GRABER, GOULD, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, Abundez-Chavez's request for oral argument is denied.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Miguel Abundez-Chavez appeals from the 33-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Abundez-Chavez contends that the district court erred when it determined that his prior conviction for discharging a firearm from a motor vehicle, in violation of Utah Code Ann. § 76-10-508, is a crime of violence as defined by U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii). We are precluded from reaching the merits of this claim by the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nunez, 223 F.3d 956, 958 (9th Cir.2000); see also United States v. Jacobo Castillo, 496 F.3d 947, 957 (9th Cir.2007) (en banc).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.