Case Name: Atkinson, solicitor-general, et al. v. Lam Amusement Co.
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1938-01-14
Citations: 185 Ga. 379
Docket Number: No. 12147
Parties: Atkinson, solicitor-general, et al. v. Lam Amusement Co.
Judges: All the Justices concur.
Reporter: Georgia Reports
Volume: 185
Pages: 379–380

Head Matter:
Atkinson, solicitor-general, et al. v. Lam Amusement Co.
No. 12147
January 14, 1938.

Opinion:
Grice, Justice.
This ease is controlled, by the ruling in Rose Theatre Inc. v. Lilly, 185 Ga. 53 (193 S. E. 866), wherein it was held that it was not error to overrule a demurrer to the petition brought by the solicitor-general, containing allegations very similar to those made in this petition, and which are substantially set forth in the accompanying statement of facts. Judgment reversed.
All the Justices concur.
W. Y. Atkinson, solicitor-general, L. L. Meadors, and Moon & Ray, for plaintiffs.
Wyatt & Morgan and Lovejoy & Mayer, for defendants.