Case Name: Abraham Revutsky, as Administrator, etc., of Miriam Revutsky, Deceased, Respondent, v. Daniel B. Fuller and Another, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1934-11
Citations: 242 A.D. 838
Docket Number: 
Parties: Abraham Revutsky, as Administrator, etc., of Miriam Revutsky, Deceased, Respondent, v. Daniel B. Fuller and Another, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 242
Pages: 838–838

Head Matter:
Abraham Revutsky, as Administrator, etc., of Miriam Revutsky, Deceased, Respondent, v. Daniel B. Fuller and Another, Appellants.

Opinion:
Motion to dismiss appeals denied, with leave to respondent to renew upon the argument of the appeals. Section 282 of the Civil Practice Act was repealed in 1932 (Laws of 1932, chap. 224) and cannot, therefore, be invoked to support the motion. We think that the question as to the effect of such repeal should be considered by this court after full argument. Prior to section 282, the rule seems to have been the same as that provided in the statute. (Keepers v. Hartley Company, 150 App. Div. 252.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.