Case Name: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. DAVID FRANKLIN HURT
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 2013-06-27
Citations: 367 N.C. 80
Docket Number: No. 505PA10
Parties: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. DAVID FRANKLIN HURT
Judges: Justice BEASLEY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
Reporter: North Carolina Reports
Volume: 367
Pages: 80–80

Head Matter:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. DAVID FRANKLIN HURT
No. 505PA10
(Filed 27 June 2013)
On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, 208 N.C. App. 1, 702 S.E.2d 82 (2010), finding prejudicial error in a judgment entered on 4 April 2008 by Judge Thomas D. Haigwood in Superior Court, Caldwell County, and remanding for a new sentencing trial. Heard in the Supreme Court on 12 February 2013.
Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Daniel P O’Brien, Assistant Attorney General, for the State-appellant.
Staples S. Hughes, Appellate Defender, by Barbara S. Blackman, Assistant Appellate Defender, for defendant-appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
For the reasons stated in State v. Ortiz-Zape,_N.C._,_, _ S.E.2d_,_(2013), the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. The case is remanded for consideration of the remaining issues on appeal.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.