Case Name: ARCHER, Respondent, v. SAFEWAY STORES, INC., Appellant
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1971-08-11
Citations: 259 Or. 510
Docket Number: 
Parties: ARCHER, Respondent, v. SAFEWAY STORES, INC., Appellant.
Judges: Before O’Connell, Chief Justice, and McAllister, PIolman, Tongue and Howell, Justices.
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 259
Pages: 510–511

Head Matter:
Argued July 8,
affirmed August 11, 1971
ARCHER, Respondent, v. SAFEWAY STORES, INC., Appellant.
487 P2d 886
Paul R. Duden, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Edwin J. Peterson and Tooze, Powers, Kerr, Tooze & Peterson, Portland.
Frederick T. Smith, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dusenbery, Martin, Bischoff & Templeton and Charles Robinowitz, Portland.
Before O’Connell, Chief Justice, and McAllister, PIolman, Tongue and Howell, Justices.

Opinion:
O'CONNELL, C.J.
This is an action to recover for personal injuries suffered by plaintiff when she fell while crossing defendant's parking lot. Defendant appeals from a judgment entered on a verdict for plaintiff.
Defendant's parking lot became slippery as a result of snow which had accumulated and which had been packed by the automobiles which had moved in and out of the lot. In all material respects the facts are essentially the same as those in Dawson v. Payless For Drugs, 248 Or 334, 433 P2d 1019, 35 ALR3d 222 (1967) and plaintiff seeks recovery on the theory announced in that case.
Defendant assigns as error the trial court's submission to the jury of certain specifications of negligence on the ground that they were unsupported by evidence and the trial court's failure to instruct the jury in certain particulars.
We find the assignments of error without merit and we can see no useful purpose that would be served by discussing them.
The case is controlled by our holding in Dawson v. Payless For Drugs, supra, and therefore the judgment must be affirmed.
Affirmed.