Case Name: Tracy Margo COOK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joe KEFFER, Warden, FMC Carswell, Carswell Federal Medical Center; Hernan Reyes, M D, Clinical Director, Carswell Federal Medical Center; Arly Surpris; J. Lancaster, Do, Cars-well Federal Medical Center; Linda Robinson, Registered Nurse, Clinical Nurse, Carswell Federal Medical Center, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-03-04
Citations: 558 F. App'x 314
Docket Number: No. 13-2354
Parties: Tracy Margo COOK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joe KEFFER, Warden, FMC Carswell, Carswell Federal Medical Center; Hernan Reyes, M D, Clinical Director, Carswell Federal Medical Center; Arly Surpris; J. Lancaster, Do, Cars- well Federal Medical Center; Linda Robinson, Registered Nurse, Clinical Nurse, Carswell Federal Medical Center, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 558
Pages: 314–315

Head Matter:
Tracy Margo COOK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joe KEFFER, Warden, FMC Carswell, Carswell Federal Medical Center; Hernan Reyes, M D, Clinical Director, Carswell Federal Medical Center; Arly Surpris; J. Lancaster, Do, Cars- well Federal Medical Center; Linda Robinson, Registered Nurse, Clinical Nurse, Carswell Federal Medical Center, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 13-2354.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 27, 2014.
Decided: March 4, 2014.
Tracy Margo Cook, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Tracy Margo Cook appeals the district court's order denying her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Although the district court denied the motion on the merits, the court did not have jurisdiction because the case had been transferred to and docketed in another federal court. See TechnoSteel, LLC v. Beers Constr. Co., 271 F.3d 151, 157 (4th Cir.2001). Accordingly, we affirm the denial of relief on that basis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.