Case Name: Carl Dean EAST, Petitioner, v. DIRECTOR OF VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Respondent
Court: District of Columbia Municipal Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Decision Date: 1959-05-01
Citations: 150 A.2d 633
Docket Number: No. 2358
Parties: Carl Dean EAST, Petitioner, v. DIRECTOR OF VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Respondent.
Judges: Before ROVER, Chief Judge, and HOOD and QUINN, Associate Judges.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 150
Pages: 633–634

Head Matter:
Carl Dean EAST, Petitioner, v. DIRECTOR OF VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Respondent.
No. 2358.
Municipal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.
Argued March 23, 1959.
Decided May 1, 1959.
Ethelbert B. Frey, Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
Ted D. Kuemmerling, Asst. Corp. Counsel, Washington, D. C., with whom Chester H. Gray, Corp. Counsel, Milton D. Kor-man, Principal Asst. Corp. Counsel, Hubert B. Pair, and Richard W. Barton, Asst. Corp. Counsel, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for respondent.
Before ROVER, Chief Judge, and HOOD and QUINN, Associate Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, as the result of his conviction of various moving traffic violations, accumu lated over twelve points" and after due administrative proceedings his operator's permit was revoked.
All of the questions raised by petitioner in his appeal have heretofore been decided by this court adversely to his contentions.
Affirmed.
. See Part V, Traffic and Motor Vehicle Regulations.
. See Glenn v. Commissioners of District of Columbia, D.C.Mun.App., 146 A.2d 575; Tillman v. Director of Vehicles, etc., D.C.Mun.App., 144 A.2d 922; Daniels v. Director of Vehicles and Traffic of District of Columbia, D.C.Mun.App., 143 A.2d 95; Ritch v. Director of Vehicles and Traffic of District of Columbia, D.C.Mun.App., 124 A.2d 301; Lambert v. Board of Com'rs of District of Columbia, D.C.Mun.App., 116 A.2d 926.