Case Name: James Lee MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald H. RUMSFELD, Secretary of Defense et al., Defendant-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1981-05-15
Citations: 647 F.2d 80
Docket Number: No. 77-1671
Parties: James Lee MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald H. RUMSFELD, Secretary of Defense et al., Defendant-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 647
Pages: 80–90

Head Matter:
James Lee MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald H. RUMSFELD, Secretary of Defense et al., Defendant-Appellees.
No. 77-1671.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 15, 1981.
Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, KENNEDY, Circuit Judge, and CHRISTENSEN, District Judge.
Honorable A. Sherman Christensen, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Utah, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
ORDER
The panel as constituted in the above case has voted to deny the petition for rehearing of 632 F.2d 788.
The suggestion for a rehearing en banc having been submitted to a vote of the full court, there is no majority in favor of the suggestion.
The petition for rehearing is denied and the suggestion for a rehearing en banc is rejected.
Among those judges of the court voting to hear the case en banc were Judges Booch-ever and Norris, who file the following dissents from the rejection of the en banc suggestion.