Case Name: Robert S. ORTLOFF, Appellant, v. Janet RENO, U.S. Attorney General, sued in her individual capacity, et al., Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-09-02
Citations: 74 F. App'x 64
Docket Number: No. 03-5053
Parties: Robert S. ORTLOFF, Appellant, v. Janet RENO, U.S. Attorney General, sued in her individual capacity, et al., Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 74
Pages: 64–64

Head Matter:
Robert S. ORTLOFF, Appellant, v. Janet RENO, U.S. Attorney General, sued in her individual capacity, et al., Appellees.
No. 03-5053.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Sept. 2, 2003.
Robert S. Ortloff, Phoenix, AZ, pro se.
Before SENTELLE, HENDERSON, and ROBERTS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See Fed. RApp. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's orders filed October 4, 2002, and November 19, 2002 be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed the complaint as barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994).
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.