Case Name: FRANK J. MAELLARO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MADISON FINANCE COMPANY OF JERSEY CITY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1944-01-27
Citations: 131 N.J.L. 160
Docket Number: 
Parties: FRANK J. MAELLARO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MADISON FINANCE COMPANY OF JERSEY CITY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 131
Pages: 160–160

Head Matter:
FRANK J. MAELLARO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MADISON FINANCE COMPANY OF JERSEY CITY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Argued October 20, 1943
Decided January 27, 1944.
For the plaintiff-appellant, William Boorstein and Henry Pass.
For the defendant-respondent, Lindabury, Depue & Faulks (Burtis S. Horner).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment below is affirmed in part upon the reasons stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court and in part upon the general view of the Small Loan Statute, R. S. 17:10-10, et seq., expressed in our opinion in Edelstein v. Hub Loan Co., 130 N. J. L. 511. Such portions of the opinion below as are directed toward the Supreme Court decision in the Edelstein case, 129 N. J. L. 497, are to be read in the light of the subsequent reversal, cited supra, of that decision.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Case, Dong-es, Porter, Colie, Dear, Wells, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.