Case Name: EDGERTON INDEPENDENT CONSOL. SCHOOL DIST. NO. 2 of HANSON COUNTY, et al, Respondents, v. WESTERN SURETY CO., Appellants
Court: South Dakota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: South Dakota
Decision Date: 1929-02-21
Citations: 54 S.D. 535
Docket Number: File No. 6560
Parties: EDGERTON INDEPENDENT CONSOL. SCHOOL DIST. NO. 2 of HANSON COUNTY, et al, Respondents, v. WESTERN SURETY CO., Appellants.
Judges: MISER, C., sitting in lieu of BROWN, J., absent.
Reporter: South Dakota Reports
Volume: 54
Pages: 535–536

Head Matter:
EDGERTON INDEPENDENT CONSOL. SCHOOL DIST. NO. 2 of HANSON COUNTY, et al, Respondents, v. WESTERN SURETY CO., Appellants.
(223 N. W. 732.)
(File No. 6560.
Opinion filed February 21, 1929.)
Kirby, Kirby & Kirby and Lynch & Doyle, all of Sioux Falls, for Appellants.
H. G. Giddings, of Mitchell, for Respondents.

Opinion:
CAMPBELL, J.
The above cause was tried in the circuit court, and, from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appealed. Upon such appeal the judgment below was reversed, without directions, and the cause was remanded to the circuit court under the customary formula "for further proceedings according to law and the decision of this court.' See Edgerton, etc., District v. Volz, 50 S. D. 107, 208 N. W. 576.
Thereafter defendants moved the circuit court, pursuant to order to show cause, to dismiss plaintiffs' complaint upon the merits, which motion was denied, and, from the order denying the motion, defendants have appealed.
The situation is practically identical with that in the case of Warwick v. Bliss, 52 S. D. 107, 216 N. W. 865, and upon the authority of that case and the case of Nelson v. Menno State Bank, 53 S. D. 398, 220 N. W. 850, the present appeal is dismissed for the reason that such order is not appealable.
MISER, C., sitting in lieu of BROWN, J., absent.
SHERWOOD, P. J., and POLLEY, BURCH, and MISER, JJ., concur.