Case Name: Barbara Jeane Blancato et al. v. Sebastian Randino
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1993-05-26
Citations: 226 Conn. 904
Docket Number: 
Parties: Barbara Jeane Blancato et al. v. Sebastian Randino
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 226
Pages: 904–904

Head Matter:
Barbara Jeane Blancato et al. v. Sebastian Randino
Alexandra Davis and Mary Rebecca Knack, legal intern, in support of the petition.
Karen P. Blado, in opposition.
Decided May 26, 1993

Opinion:
The plaintiffs' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 30 Conn. App. 810 (AC 11398), is granted, limited to the following issues:
"(1) Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court improperly apply the general verdict rule to bar consideration of the plaintiff's claim regarding the jury charge on negligence per se?
"(2) If the answer to (1) is yes, was the jury charge on negligence per se harmful error?"