Case Name: BARNETT v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1914-10-14
Citations: 170 S.W. 143
Docket Number: No. 3212
Parties: BARNETT v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 170
Pages: 143–144

Head Matter:
BARNETT v. STATE.
(No. 3212.)
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Oct. 14, 1914.)
1. Criminal Law (§ 982 ) — Suspension of Sentence — Recommendation by Juey.
Under Acts 33d Leg. c. 7, § 1, providing that before a sentence can be suspended, an application for suspension must be made in writing, a recommendation in the verdict that sentence be suspended may be disregarded by the judge, where no application for suspension was filed before the verdict was rendered.
[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law,^ Cent. Dig. §§ 2500, 2501; Dec. Dig. §
2. Criminal Law (§ 1090 ) — Appeal—Bills of Exception — Presenting Questions in Lower Court.
Where there are no bills of exception in the record on appeal in a criminal case, and no exception was taken to the charge of the court before verdict was rendered, grounds in the motion for new trial complaining of the court’s charge cannot be considered.
[Ed. Note. — For other eases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2653, 2789, 2803-2822, 2825-2827, 2927, 2928, 2948, 3204; Dec. Dig. § 1090. ]
Appeal from Special District Court, Gray-son County; W. J. Mathis, Judge.
J. H. Barnett was convicted of selling liquor in prohibition territory, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
For other cases see same topic and section NUMBER in Dec. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key-No. Series & Rep’r Indexes

Opinion:
HARPER, J.
Appellant was indicted for selling liquor in prohibition territory, and upon trial the jury returned the following verdict:
"We, the jurors, find the defendant guilty as charged and assess his punishment at confinement in the penitentiary for one year. We, the jurors, recommend that sentence be suspended as this being the first offense."
The question arises, Is a jury authorized to recommend a suspension of the sentence when no application has been made by the person on trial? We think not. The law is plain. Before a sentence can be suspended, "application therefor must be made in writing, sworn to and filed before the trial begins." Section 1, c. 7, Acts 33d Leg. As no application was filed until after verdict, the court properly ignored that portion of the verdict of the jury and correctly passed sentence on the appellant. In the absence of an application voluntarily made by the appellant, filed before the trial begins, the jury and the court are without authority to suspend the sentence. A strict compliance with the terms of this act of the Legislature is required before one is entitled to the bene fits of its terms. Had the appellant filed an application for suspension of sentence, the state would then have been permitted to introduce testimony on that issue, but it was not entitled to do so until the plea had been filed. The form of indictment in this case has been frequently approved by this court, and the court did not err in refusing to arrest the judgment.
There are no bills of exception in the record, and no exception was taken to the charge of the court before verdict was rendered, consequently those grounds in the motion for new trial complaining of the court's charge cannot be considered by us.
The judgment is affirmed.