Case Name: Earl Boyd, Respondent, v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corporation, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1985-10-08
Citations: 114 A.D.2d 307
Docket Number: 
Parties: Earl Boyd, Respondent, v New York City Health & Hospitals Corporation, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 114
Pages: 307–307

Head Matter:
(October 8, 1985)
Earl Boyd, Respondent, v New York City Health & Hospitals Corporation, Appellant.

Opinion:
Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Arthur Blyn, J.), entered on or about April 26, 1984, which granted plaintiffs motion to set aside the jury verdict in favor of defendant New York City Health & Hospitals Corporation on the ground of defense counsel's misconduct and ordered a new trial in the interest of justice, is reversed to the extent appealed from, on the law and the facts, without costs, the motion denied and the jury verdict reinstated.
We have examined the record and are in agreement with that part of the trial court's decision which held that the jury's determination was not against the weight of credible evidence.
The point at which zealous advocacy by an attorney in a protracted, hard fought trial becomes misconduct often presents a difficult issue, as it does here, as to which reasonable people may disagree. Recognizing that the trial court should be in a better position than we are to evaluate the question, we are nevertheless not persuaded that the record discloses conduct by the defendant's attorney that would justify setting aside a jury verdict adequately supported by the evidence, particularly in the absence during the lengthy trial of any motion by plaintiffs counsel for a mistrial. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sandler, Asch, Kassal and Rosenberger, JJ.