Case Name: EGBERT, Appellant, v. PENK et al, Defendants, EGBERT, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1982-06-16
Citations: 57 Or. App. 830
Docket Number: No. A8104-02371, CA A22342
Parties: EGBERT, Appellant, v. PENK et al, Defendants, EGBERT, Respondent.
Judges: Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Young, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 57
Pages: 830–831

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted April 14,
affirmed June 16,
reconsideration denied July 22, petition for review denied October 5, 1982 (293 Or 635)
EGBERT, Appellant, v. PENK et al, Defendants, EGBERT, Respondent.
(No. [ AXXXX-XXXXX ], CA A22342)
646 P2d 639
Michael. J. Kavanaugh, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Lekas & Dicey, Portland.
William A. Masters, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Mitchell, Land & Smith, Portland.
Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Young, Judges.
PER CURIAM.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
This was an action for personal injuries brought by a child against her mother, inter alia. The mother's liability was allegedly based upon simple negligence. The trial court granted summary judgment to the mother. The child appeals. We affirm, based upon the established doctrine that an action will not lie in these circumstances for mere negligence. Cowgill v. Adm'r v. Boock, Adm'r, 189 Or 282, 218 P2d 445 (1950).
Affirmed.
Other aspects of the case are not before us.