Case Name: DANIEL TOFFEY and others, Respondents, v. STEPHEN T. WILLIAMS, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1874-12
Citations: 10 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 217
Docket Number: 
Parties: DANIEL TOFFEY and others, Respondents, v. STEPHEN T. WILLIAMS, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Supreme Court Reports (Hun)
Volume: 10
Pages: 217–217

Head Matter:
DANIEL TOFFEY and others, Respondents, v. STEPHEN T. WILLIAMS, Appellant.
Order of wrest—when granted.
Where two separate causes of action are joined in a complaint, an order of arrest will not lie unless there be a right of arrest upon the entire claim of the complaint.
An order of arrest should not be granted in an action brought to recover a balance upon a running account, made up in great part of items entirely untainted with fraud.
Appeal from an order made at the Special Term, denying a motion made by the defendant to vacate an order of arrest.
Sha/w <& Jeroloman, for the appellant.
Abraham & Merritt, for the respondents.
Bowen v. True, 53 N. Y., 640; McGovern v. Payn, 32 Barb., 84.

Opinion:
Opinion by Barrett, J.
Davis, P. J., and Daniels, J., concurred.
Order reversed with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and order of arrest vacated with ten dollars costs.