Case Name: In the Matter of the Application of ANGELO BIARDO for a Writ of Habeas Corpus; In the Matter of the Application of JACK BIARDO for a Writ of Habeas Corpus; In the Matter of the Application of JOHN CERRUTI for a Writ of Habeas Corpus; In the Matter of the Application of G. SPORTUNIO for a Writ of Habeas Corpus
Court: Supreme Court of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1925-04-11
Citations: 195 Cal. 778
Docket Number: Crim. No. 2737; Crim. No. 2738; Crim. No. 2739; Crim. No. 2740
Parties: In the Matter of the Application of ANGELO BIARDO for a Writ of Habeas Corpus; In the Matter of the Application of JACK BIARDO for a Writ of Habeas Corpus; In the Matter of the Application of JOHN CERRUTI for a Writ of Habeas Corpus; In the Matter of the Application of G. SPORTUNIO for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Reports
Volume: 195
Pages: 778–778

Head Matter:
[Crim. No. 2737.
In Bank.
April 11, 1925.]
In the Matter of the Application of ANGELO BIARDO for a Writ of Habeas Corpus; In the Matter of the Application of JACK BIARDO for a Writ of Habeas Corpus; In the Matter of the Application of JOHN CERRUTI for a Writ of Habeas Corpus; In the Matter of the Application of G. SPORTUNIO for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.
[Crim. No. 2738.
In Bank.
April 11, 1925.]
[Crim. No. 2739.
In Bank.
April 11, 1925.]
[Crim.. No. 2740.
In Bank.
April 11, 1925.]
I. F. Chapman and F. A. Berry for Petitioners.
B. D. Marx Greene for Bespondent.

Opinion:
THE COURT.
The precise point is presented in each of the above-entitled 'petitions as was presented and decided this day in Ex parte Berto, ante, p. 774 [235 Pac. 735]. Upon the authority of that case the writ is discharged and the petitioner remanded in each of the above-entitled matters.