Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. CONSTANCE JEAN HARRIS, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1992-01-22
Citations: 111 Or. App. 106
Docket Number: DA 406099-8910; CA A68845
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. CONSTANCE JEAN HARRIS, Appellant.
Judges: Before Joseph, Chief Judge, and Deits and Durham, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 111
Pages: 106–107

Head Matter:
Submitted on record and briefs December 19, 1991,
convictions affirmed and remanded for resentencing January 22, 1992
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. CONSTANCE JEAN HARRIS, Appellant.
(DA 406099-8910; CA A68845)
823 P2d 452
Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, and Louis R. Miles, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, filed the brief for appellant.
Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Michael M. Pacheco, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Joseph, Chief Judge, and Deits and Durham, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
After defendant's convictions for theft in the third degree and criminal trespass in the second degree, her appointed trial counsel was relieved of responsibility. Defendant requested that the trial court appoint counsel to represent her at the sentencing, but it failed to do so.
Defendant was entitled to court appointed counsel for her sentencing. ORS 135.050(5). The state concedes that the trial court did not establish on the record that defendant intelligently and competently waived her right to counsel or determine whether the interests of justice required a substitution of counsel. Therefore, defendant is entitled to be resentenced.
Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing.