Case Name: Emiliano SANTIAGO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Donald H. RUMSFELD, Secretary of Defense; Les Brownlee, Secretary of the United States Department of the Army (Acting); Raymond Byrne, Acting Adjutant General of the Oregon National Guard; David Doran, Captain, Detachment One, Company D, 113 Aviation Unit Commander, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-04-07
Citations: 403 F.3d 702
Docket Number: No. 05-35005
Parties: Emiliano SANTIAGO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Donald H. RUMSFELD, Secretary of Defense; Les Brownlee, Secretary of the United States Department of the Army (Acting); Raymond Byrne, Acting Adjutant General of the Oregon National Guard; David Doran, Captain, Detachment One, Company D, 113 Aviation Unit Commander, Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: Before: THOMAS, Circuit Judge and En Banc Coordinator.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 403
Pages: 702–703

Head Matter:
Emiliano SANTIAGO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Donald H. RUMSFELD, Secretary of Defense; Les Brownlee, Secretary of the United States Department of the Army (Acting); Raymond Byrne, Acting Adjutant General of the Oregon National Guard; David Doran, Captain, Detachment One, Company D, 113 Aviation Unit Commander, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 05-35005.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
April 7, 2005.
David S. Ettinger, Esq., Lisa R. Jaskol, Esq., Jon B. Eisenberg, Esq., Horvitz & Levy, Encino, CA, Steven Goldberg, Esq., Goldberg, Mechanic, Stuart & Gibson, Lip, Portland, OR, for Petitioner-Appellant.
Robert M. Loeb, Esq., H. Thomas Byron, III, Esq., Washington, DC, for Respondents-Appellees.
Michael S. Sorgen, Esq., Law Offices of Michael Sorgen, San Francisco, CA, for Amicus.
Before: THOMAS, Circuit Judge and En Banc Coordinator.

Opinion:
ORDER
The request for initial hearing en banc on the Appellant's motion for an injunction pending appeal was referred to the entire court. No judge requested a vote of the active non-recused judges on the initial hearing en banc request within the time established for requesting a vote.
Therefore, the request for initial hearing en banc on the motion for an injunction pending appeal is DENIED. The panel shall resume control of the case.