Case Name: Gamble v. Sacks, Warden
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1961-03-15
Citations: 172 Ohio St. 60
Docket Number: No. 36776
Parties: Gamble v. Sacks, Warden.
Judges: Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Tapt, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and O’Neill, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, New Service
Volume: 172
Pages: 60–60

Head Matter:
Gamble v. Sacks, Warden.
(No. 36776
Decided March 15, 1961.)
Mr. Howard Gamble, Jr., in propria persona.
Mr. Mark McElroy, attorney general, and Mr. Aubrey A. Wendt, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Petitioner had an adequate remedy by way of appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence to review the alleged irregularities of which he complains and which he claims deprived him of his constitutional rights and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in habeas corpus.
Petitioner remanded to custody.
Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Tapt, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and O'Neill, JJ., concur.