Case Name: Ruth ATKINS, Appellant, v. TREASURER OF MISSOURI AS CUSTODIAN OF SECOND INJURY FUND, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2008-10-28
Citations: 267 S.W.3d 821
Docket Number: No. ED 91274
Parties: Ruth ATKINS, Appellant, v. TREASURER OF MISSOURI AS CUSTODIAN OF SECOND INJURY FUND, Respondent.
Judges: Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 267
Pages: 821–821

Head Matter:
Ruth ATKINS, Appellant, v. TREASURER OF MISSOURI AS CUSTODIAN OF SECOND INJURY FUND, Respondent.
No. ED 91274.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Oct. 28, 2008.
James E. Heckel, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Kareitha A. Osborne, Attorney Generals Office of State Courts Administrator, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.
Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Ruth Atkins (hereinafter, "Claimant") appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (hereinafter, "the Commission") awarding her permanent partial disability benefits. Claimant raises two points on appeal challenging the Commission's decision to deny Claimant's request for permanent total disability benefits arguing the Commission's decision lacked support based on the competent and substantial evidence presented.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and transcript on appeal. The Commission's decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the record and no error of law appears. Hampton v. Big Boy Steel Erection, 121 S.W.3d 220, 222-23 (Mo. banc 2003). An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. The Commission's decision is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).