Case Name: Kleinberg Electric, Inc., Respondent, v. East 67th Street Townhouse Building Corp. et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1993-12-23
Citations: 199 A.D.2d 188
Docket Number: 
Parties: Kleinberg Electric, Inc., Respondent, v East 67th Street Townhouse Building Corp. et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 199
Pages: 188–188

Head Matter:
Kleinberg Electric, Inc., Respondent, v East 67th Street Townhouse Building Corp. et al., Appellants.
[608 NYS2d 60]

Opinion:
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan Lobis, J.), entered October 20, 1992, upon a verdict in favor of plaintiff and against defendants awarding damages in the amount of $109,264.96 inclusive of interest, costs and disbursements, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
The several improprieties catalogued by defendants concerning plaintiff's counsel's summation remarks, while not to be condoned, did not, separately or together, deprive them of a fair trial (see, Rohring v City of Niagara Falls, 192 AD2d 228, 230-231). Defendants' other contention, that the jury's responses to the court's special verdict sheet were inconsistent, is without merit. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Carro, Ellerin and Kupferman, JJ.