Case Name: State of Connecticut v. Dante DeLoreto
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1988-04-26
Citations: 14 Conn. App. 813
Docket Number: 6398
Parties: State of Connecticut v. Dante DeLoreto
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Appellate Reports
Volume: 14
Pages: 813–813

Head Matter:
State of Connecticut v. Dante DeLoreto
(6398)
Borden, Spallone and Foti, Js.
Argued April 7 —
decision released April 26, 1988
David A. Zippel, with whom was Vincent Trantolo and, on the brief, Joseph J. Trantolo, for the appellant (defendant).
James M. Ralls, deputy assistant state’s attorney, with whom, on the brief, was Samuel Sferraza, assistant state’s attorney, for the appellee (state).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We have fully reviewed the defendant's claim of evidentiary error, to the extent that the claim has been properly presented to us on appeal and to the extent that the claim coincides with the objections made at trial. With that background in mind, and affording the defendant's claim its proper scope of review, we find the claim to be without merit.
There is no error.