Case Name: The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Way, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1996-01-10
Citations: 74 Ohio St. 3d 236
Docket Number: No. 95-854
Parties: The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Way, Appellant.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 74
Pages: 236–237

Head Matter:
The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Way, Appellant.
[Cite as State v. Way (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 236.]
(No. 95-854
Submitted September 12, 1995
Decided January 10, 1996.)
Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Philip R. Cummings, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
Chief T.C. Way, pro se.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Under App.R. 26(B)(2)(b), an application for reopening requires "[a] showing of good cause for untimely filing if the application is filed more than ninety days after journalization of the appellate judgment[.]" Here, the appellate judgments were journalized on June 28, 1989 and January 10, 1990, and the appellant filed his appeal on February 22, 1995, over five years later. Nowhere in the record does appellant offer any good cause for his untimely filing. Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the court of appeals.
Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.