Case Name: In re PUBLIC-SECTOR SOLUTIONS, INC., Debtor, Public-Sector Solutions, Inc., Debtor-Appellant, v. Hcg Software, LLC, Creditor-Appellee, and Greene & Markley, P.C.; Hunt & Associates, P.C., Creditors, Joseph J. Bellinger, Trustee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-05-26
Citations: 602 F. App'x 929
Docket Number: No. 14-2162
Parties: In re PUBLIC-SECTOR SOLUTIONS, INC., Debtor, Public-Sector Solutions, Inc., Debtor-Appellant, v. Hcg Software, LLC, Creditor-Appellee, and Greene & Markley, P.C.; Hunt & Associates, P.C., Creditors, Joseph J. Bellinger, Trustee.
Judges: Before KEENAN, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Bankruptcy Reporter
Volume: 532
Pages: 1111–1112

Head Matter:
In re PUBLIC-SECTOR SOLUTIONS, INC., Debtor, Public-Sector Solutions, Inc., Debtor-Appellant, v. Hcg Software, LLC, Creditor-Appellee, and Greene & Markley, P.C.; Hunt & Associates, P.C., Creditors, Joseph J. Bellinger, Trustee.
No. 14-2162.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 28, 2015.
Decided: May 26, 2015.
Arthur G. Kahn, Alexakis & Kahn, PLLC, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. G. David Dean, Cole, Schotz, Meisel, For-man & Leonard, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before KEENAN, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Public-Sector Solutions, Inc., appeals the district court's order dismissing its appeal from the bankruptcy court's order entering relief on the involuntary Chapter 7 petition filed by HCG Software, LLC. We have reviewed the record included on appeal, as well as the parties' briefs, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Public-Sector Solutions, Inc. v. HCG Software, LLC., No. 1:14-cv-02368-JKB (D.Md. Sept. 24, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.