Case Name: JAMES R. NUGENT, APPELLANT, v. FLORENCE E. CAHILL ET AL., RESPONDENTS
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1927-01-31
Citations: 103 N.J.L. 499
Docket Number: 
Parties: JAMES R. NUGENT, APPELLANT, v. FLORENCE E. CAHILL ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 103
Pages: 499–499

Head Matter:
JAMES R. NUGENT, APPELLANT, v. FLORENCE E. CAHILL ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Submitted October 29, 1926
Decided January 31, 1927.
Por the appellant, James R. Nugent.
Por the respondents, Herbert Boggs and John Francis Cahill.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 12.
For reversal — Kone.