Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Malcolm Carl YOUNG, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-05-31
Citations: 521 F. App'x 309
Docket Number: No. 13-6352
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Malcolm Carl YOUNG, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 521
Pages: 309–310

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Malcolm Carl YOUNG, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-6352.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 23, 2013.
Decided: May 31, 2013.
Malcolm Carl Young, Appellant Pro Se. Ryan Lee Souders, Jeb Thomas Terrien, Assistant United States Attorneys, Harri-sonburg, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Malcolm Carl Young appeals the district court's order denying his motion for sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Young, No. 5:09-cr-00036-GEC-JGW-1 (W.D.Va. Feb. 8, 2013). We dispense with oral ar gument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.