Case Name: Tony Lee BELTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dr. Joel SEXTON; Dr. Janice Ross; Margaret Hinds, Esquire; Thomas Scott, III, Esquire, are all being sued in their individual and official capacity, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-08-27
Citations: 539 F. App'x 87
Docket Number: No. 13-6704
Parties: Tony Lee BELTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dr. Joel SEXTON; Dr. Janice Ross; Margaret Hinds, Esquire; Thomas Scott, III, Esquire, are all being sued in their individual and official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 539
Pages: 87–87

Head Matter:
Tony Lee BELTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dr. Joel SEXTON; Dr. Janice Ross; Margaret Hinds, Esquire; Thomas Scott, III, Esquire, are all being sued in their individual and official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 13-6704.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 22, 2013.
Decided: Aug. 27, 2013.
Tony Lee Belton, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MOTZ, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Tony Lee Belton appeals the district court's order accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2006) action against Defendants after a 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (2006) review, and has filed a motion for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Belton's motion for appointment of counsel and affirm the district court's judgment. Belton v. Sexton, No. 1:13-cv-00389-DCN, 2013 WL 1624493 (D.S.C. filed Apr. 15, 2013; entered Apr. 16, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.