Case Name: Livingston JOSEPH, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2005-11-30
Citations: 924 So. 2d 19
Docket Number: No. 3D05-2240
Parties: Livingston JOSEPH, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: Before COPE, C.J., and SHEPHERD, J., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 924
Pages: 19–19

Head Matter:
Livingston JOSEPH, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 3D05-2240.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 30, 2005.
Rehearing Denied April 4, 2006.
Livingston Joseph, in proper person.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Maria T. Armas, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Before COPE, C.J., and SHEPHERD, J., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Livingston Joseph has filed a petition for writ of mandamus and/or motion to enforce mandate. He contends that this court's mandate in Joseph v. State, 547 So.2d 249 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), was never complied with.
The State's response demonstrates that on remand from this court's 1989 decision, the trial court in 1990 complied with the mandate by entering a sentencing guidelines departure order on count two, and vacating count three. Further, the petitioner has previously raised the claim that the trial court failed to comply with this court's mandate, and relief has been denied on previous occasions.
The petition for writ of mandamus and alternative motion to enforce mandate are denied.