Case Name: In the Matter of the Compensation of WHITE, Petitioner, v. STAYTON CANNING COMPANY, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1980-09-15
Citations: 48 Or. App. 227
Docket Number: No. 78-1307, CA 17200
Parties: In the Matter of the Compensation of WHITE, Petitioner, v. STAYTON CANNING COMPANY, Respondent.
Judges: Before Joseph, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Warren, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 48
Pages: 227–227-a

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted August 11,
reversed September 15, 1980
In the Matter of the Compensation of WHITE, Petitioner, v. STAYTON CANNING COMPANY, Respondent.
(No. 78-1307, CA 17200)
616 P2d 579
Mike Dye, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.
Scott M. Kelley, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Cheney & Kelley, Portland.
Before Joseph, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Warren, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
In determining that this claimant is permanently and totally disabled, the referee properly analyzed the factors of claimant's age, training, aptitude, adaptability to do nonphysical labor, mental capacity and emotional condition, as well as the state of the labor market. Wilson v. Weyerhaeuser, 30 or App 403, 409, 567 P2d 567 (1977).
In making a determination that claimant has only a permanent partial disability, the Board erred.
Reversed.