Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DARREN TODD CROWLEY, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1991-02-13
Citations: 105 Or. App. 619
Docket Number: 89-07-33734; CA A64244
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DARREN TODD CROWLEY, Appellant.
Judges: Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Rossman and De Muniz, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 105
Pages: 619–620

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted December 10, 1990,
conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing February 13, 1991
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DARREN TODD CROWLEY, Appellant.
(89-07-33734; CA A64244)
804 P2d 1226
Laura Graser, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.
Jonathan H. Fussner, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.
Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Rossman and De Muniz, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
We accept the state's concession that the trial court's order establishing conditions of probation is ambiguous.
Conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing.