Case Name: Catherine S. TYSON, Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, et al., Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2017-02-21
Citations: 510 S.W.3d 897
Docket Number: No. ED 104210
Parties: Catherine S. TYSON, Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, et al., Respondents.
Judges: Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 510
Pages: 897–897

Head Matter:
Catherine S. TYSON, Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, et al., Respondents.
No. ED 104210
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Filed: February 21, 2017
Catherine S. Tyson, Chesterfield, MO, Acting Pro Se.
Mark Lawson, Associate City Counselor, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent City of St. Louis.
Rory P. O’Sullivan, Stephen J. Kovac, St. Louis, MO, for Resp. Gregory F.X. Daly.
Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Catherine S. Tyson ("Plaintiff") appeals the judgment, entered after a bench trial, finding in favor of the City of St. Louis and Gregory F.X. Daly, in his official capacity as Collector of Revenue for the City of St. Louis, on Plaintiffs petition for declaratory judgment. We find no error has occurred.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).