Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Visa EL, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-01-24
Citations: 265 F. App'x 577
Docket Number: No. 07-30177
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Visa EL, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 265
Pages: 577–577

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Visa EL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-30177.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 14, 2008.
Filed Jan. 24, 2008.
Helen J. Brunner, Esq., Susan M. Roe, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Jeff Ellis, Esq., Ellis Holmes & Witchley, PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: HALL, O’SCANNLAIN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). El’s motion to waive oral argument is granted.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Visa El appeals from the 6-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for misprision of a felony in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 4. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
El contends that the district court's discussion of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors was inadequate. We disagree. See Gall v. United States, — U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 586, 597, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); Rita v. United States, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 2469, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007); United States v. Perez-Perez, 512 F.3d 514, 514-17 (9th Cir.2008).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.