Case Name: Mark C. SUTTON, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Deborah S. SUTTON, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1993-06-29
Citations: 856 S.W.2d 376
Docket Number: No. 62735
Parties: Mark C. SUTTON, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Deborah S. SUTTON, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before AHRENS, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 856
Pages: 376–376

Head Matter:
Mark C. SUTTON, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Deborah S. SUTTON, Respondent/Respondent.
No. 62735.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
June 29, 1993.
Deborah J. Tomich, Knight, Schoeneberg & Tomich, St. Charles, for petitioner, appellant.
J. Patrick Winning, Janis B. Powell, Patrick Winning & Associates, St. Louis, MO, for respondent, respondent.
Before AHRENS, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Father appeals from that portion of the dissolution decree awarding general care, custody, and control of the couple's minor daughter to mother. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).