Case Name: IN THE MATTER OF BECK
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1981-04-09
Citations: 247 Ga. 461
Docket Number: Supreme Court Disciplinary No. 90
Parties: IN THE MATTER OF BECK.
Judges: All the Justices concur.
Reporter: Georgia Reports
Volume: 247
Pages: 461–461

Head Matter:
IN THE MATTER OF BECK.
(Supreme Court Disciplinary No. 90)
Decided April 9, 1981.
Omer W. Franklin, Jr., General Counsel State Bar, James E. Spence, Jr., Assistant General Counsel State Bar, Victor Alexander, Jr., Assistant General Counsel State Bar, for State Bar of Georgia.
Sartain & Carey, Jack M. Carey, for Beck.

Opinion:
Per curiam.
Respondent, on a formal complaint for disbarment, was charged with violating State Bar Rule 4-102 Standard 66 in that he was sentenced on a nolo contendere plea in U. S. District Court, Northern District of Georgia, to a criminal indictment alleging violation of 18 USCA 1006 and 1014 during February and March, 1975. The Special Master dismissed the disbarment proceedings for failure to state a claim. The State Bar Disciplinary Board remanded the case to the Special Master for additional evidence. Thereafter respondent petitioned for voluntary discipline of reprimand. The Special Master recommended a private reprimand. The State Bar Disciplinary Board recommends a public reprimand. After a review of the record, the State Bar Disciplinary Board's recommendation is approved and a public reprimand is ordered.
All the Justices concur.