Case Name: Hugh Jarrot v. The State
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1914-06-03
Citations: 74 Tex. Crim. 500
Docket Number: No. 3155
Parties: Hugh Jarrot v. The State.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Criminal Reports
Volume: 74
Pages: 500–501

Head Matter:
Hugh Jarrot v. The State.
No. 3155.
Decided June 3, 1914.
Rehearing denied June 26, 1914.
1.—Local Option—Sufficiency of the Evidence.
Where, upon trial of a violation' of the local option law, the evidence sustained the conviction, the judgment, in the absence of exceptions to the evidence or to the court’s charge, must be affirmed.
8.—Same—Reforming Judgment—Indeterminate Sentence.
Where, upon trial of a violation of the local option law, the defendant was found guilty and his punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary, and it appeared on appeal that the court should have passed on defendant an indeterminate sentence, the same was reformed accordingly.
Appéal from the District Court of Montague. Tried helow before the Hon. C. F. Spencer.
Appeal from a conviction pf a violation of the local option law; penalty, two years imprisonment in the penitentiary.
The opinion states the case.
T. E. Yarbrough and J. 8. Jameson, for appellant.
C. E. Lane, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Opinion:
HABPEB,- Judge.
Appellant was convicted of violating the local
prohibition law, and his punishment assessed at two years confinement in the State penitentiary.
Ho exceptions were reserved to the introduction of testimony; no objections were made to the charge of the court when submitted to counsel, and no special charges were requested. Consequently, the only question presented for a review is the sufficiency of the testimony. The facts and circumstances in evidence fully sustain the verdict and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.