Case Name: Pete Hair v. The State
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1929-02-13
Citations: 112 Tex. Crim. 37
Docket Number: No. 12248
Parties: Pete Hair v. The State.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Criminal Reports
Volume: 112
Pages: 37–37

Head Matter:
Pete Hair v. The State.
No. 12248.
Delivered February 13, 1929.
The opinion states the case.
Arrington & Johnson of Mineral Wells, for appellant.
A. D. Dawson of Canton, State’s Attorney, for the State.

Opinion:
LATTIMORE, Judge.
— Conviction for manslaughter; punishment, five years in the penitentiary.
Attention is called by the State's Attorney with this court to the fact that the statement of facts and bills of exception were filed too late. Examining the record we discover that the trial court overruled appellant's motion for new trial on April 2, 1928, at which time appellant gave notice of appeal to this court. He was also then granted ninety days in which to file statement of facts and bills of exception. Computation discloses that this time so granted expired on July 1, 1928. We find in the record an order attempting to grant thirty days from and after July 2nd, in which to file said statement of facts and bills of exception. Under numerous authorities the trial court has no power to extend the time for such filing, either of the statement of facts or bills of exception, beyond the ninety day period fixed in Art. 760 C. C. P.
Appellant appears to have been charged properly with murder, upon trial of which under the charge of the court he was convicted of manslaughter. The verdict is followed by the judgment and sentence.
' Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.
Affirmed.