Case Name: James M. BAILEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-01-26
Citations: 985 S.W.2d 393
Docket Number: No. 74088
Parties: James M. BAILEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before JAMES R. DOWD, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 985
Pages: 393–394

Head Matter:
James M. BAILEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 74088.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Jan. 26, 1999.
John M. Schilmoeller, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Krista D. Boston, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before JAMES R. DOWD, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
James M. Bailey (Movant) appeals from the circuit court's judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion to vacate, set aside or correct his judgment or sentence. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).