Case Name: SMOLINSKI v. ANSELM
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1923-02-12
Citations: 1 Ohio Law Abs. 268
Docket Number: No. 4211
Parties: SMOLINSKI v. ANSELM
Judges: 
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 1
Pages: 268–268

Head Matter:
226
SMOLINSKI v. ANSELM
Ohio Court of Appeals, Cuyahoga County.
No. 4211.
February 12, 1923
This opinion has not been published except in Abstract.
EVIDENCE — (1) Expert witness sufficiently qualified to make evidence competent — (2) Reviewing-court will not disturb a verdict unless so clearly unsupported by evidence as to indicate bias.
Error to Municipal Court of Cleveland
Attorneys, Safran, Nuncio & Romano, for Smol-inski; D. A. Christopher, for Anselm._

Opinion:
SULLIVAN, J.
Epitomized Opinion
It is sought to reverse a judgment of the Municipal Court on two grounds, first, that it erred in admitting testimony of an expert not sufficiently qualified; and second, that the judgment is against the weight of the evidence. Held by Court of Appeals in affirming M. C.:
1. 'The expert witness in question was sufficiently qualified to make his evidence competent.
2. The Court of Appeals will reverse a judgment because the verdict is against the weight of the evidence unless it is so clearly unsupported by the weight of the evidence as to indicate bias, mistake wilful disregard of duty by the jury.