Case Name: Kevin EDWARDS, Appellant/Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-12-18
Citations: 389 S.W.3d 232
Docket Number: No. ED 97987
Parties: Kevin EDWARDS, Appellant/Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., MARY K HOFF, J., and LISA S. VAN AMBURG, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 389
Pages: 232–233

Head Matter:
Kevin EDWARDS, Appellant/Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 97987.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Dec. 18, 2012.
Andrew Edward Zleit, Missouri Public Defender’s Office, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Timothy Allan Blackwell, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., MARY K HOFF, J., and LISA S. VAN AMBURG, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Kevin Edwards appeals from the motion court's findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order (judgment) denying his Rule 24.035 Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence and Request for Evidentiary Hearing. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).