Case Name: Alfred T. THOMAS; Randy L. Thomas, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG SCHOOLS; Raymond Giovanelli; Muffet Garber; Michele E. Morris; Maria B. Petrea, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-06-26
Citations: 231 F. App'x 236
Docket Number: No. 06-2281
Parties: Alfred T. THOMAS; Randy L. Thomas, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG SCHOOLS; Raymond Giovanelli; Muffet Garber; Michele E. Morris; Maria B. Petrea, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 231
Pages: 236–236

Head Matter:
Alfred T. THOMAS; Randy L. Thomas, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG SCHOOLS; Raymond Giovanelli; Muffet Garber; Michele E. Morris; Maria B. Petrea, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 06-2281.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 21, 2007.
Decided: June 26, 2007.
Alfred T. Thomas, Randy L. Thomas, Appellants Pro Se. Mark Weston Johnson, Helms, Mulliss & Wicker, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Alfred T. Thomas and Randy L. Thomas appeal the district court's order granting Defendants' motion to dismiss and dismissing the 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thomas v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Bd. of Educ., No. 3:06-cv-00238, 2006 WL 3257051 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 9, 2006). We deny Thomas' motions to certify and for sanctions, and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.