Case Name: Michael Daniel CUERO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Matthew CATE, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-03-08
Citations: 850 F.3d 1019
Docket Number: No. 12-55911
Parties: Michael Daniel CUERO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Matthew CATE, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before: DIARMUID F. O’SCANNLAIN, BARRY G. SILVERMAN, and KIM McLANE WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 850
Pages: 1019–1037

Head Matter:
Michael Daniel CUERO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Matthew CATE, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 12-55911
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted August 5, 2015 Pasadena, California
Filed March 8, 2017
Devin Burstein (argued), Warren & Bur-stein, San Diego, California, for Petitioner-Appellant.
Anthony Da Silva (argued) and Matthew Mulford, Deputy Attorneys General; Julie L. Garland, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Gerald A. Engler, Chief Assistant Attorney General; Kamala Harris, Attorney General of California; Office of the Attorney General, San Diego, California; for Respondent-Appellee.
Before: DIARMUID F. O’SCANNLAIN, BARRY G. SILVERMAN, and KIM McLANE WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Concurrence by Judge WARDLAW;
Dissent by Judge CALLAHAN
ORDER
Judges Silverman and Wardlaw have voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc. Judge O'Scannlain has voted to grant the petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc.
The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a'majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35.
The petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
. Judge O'Scannlain and Judge Silverman both voted on the petition for rehearing en banc while they were in active status.