Case Name: Rose SOBEL, Respondent, v. Sarah Philip SOBEL, individually and as Executrix and Trustee, etc., and Frederick Sobel, impleaded, etc., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1916-02-11
Citations: 157 N.Y.S. 1146
Docket Number: 
Parties: Rose SOBEL, Respondent, v. Sarah Philip SOBEL, individually and as Executrix and Trustee, etc., and Frederick Sobel, impleaded, etc., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 157
Pages: 1146–1146

Head Matter:
Rose SOBEL, Respondent, v. Sarah Philip SOBEL, individually and as Executrix and Trustee, etc., and Frederick Sobel, impleaded, etc., Appellants.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
February 11, 1916.)
Appeal from Special Term, New York County.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The order appealed from should be modified by striking therefrom, after the words "the financial condition of the defendant Frederick Sobel," the following: "And of the differences between the plaintiff and the defendant Frederick Sobel prior to such assignment"—and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. Settle order on notice.