Case Name: D.D.O., a juvenile, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-02-06
Citations: 557 So. 2d 103
Docket Number: No. 89-749
Parties: D.D.O., a juvenile, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and GODERICH, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 557
Pages: 103–104

Head Matter:
D.D.O., a juvenile, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 89-749.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 6, 1990.
Bennett H. Brummer and Wendell Graham and John Lipinski, Sp. Asst. Public Defenders, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Hollywood, and Patricia Ann Ash, for appellee.
Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and GODERICH, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Juvenile appeals an adjudication of delinquency for theft of an automobile and trespass of a conveyance. The State concedes properly that the evidence at trial was insufficient to prove that the Defendant had the requisite intent to be found guilty as charged, and we therefore reverse the adjudication of delinquency and remand for appropriate proceedings. See B.P. v. State, 515 So.2d 423 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); R.M. v. State, 450 So.2d 897 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); B.L.W. v. State, 393 So.2d 59 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).