Case Name: Mose Franklin PEARSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1977-11-10
Citations: 563 F.2d 243
Docket Number: No. 77-1705
Parties: Mose Franklin PEARSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 563
Pages: 243–243

Head Matter:
Mose Franklin PEARSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 77-1705
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Nov. 10, 1977.
Rehearing Denied Dec. 15, 1977.
Mose Franklin Pearson, pro se.
J. R. Brooks, U. S. Atty., James C. Thom-ason, III, Asst. U. S. Atty., Birmingham, Ala., for respondent-appellee.
Before AINSWORTH, MORGAN and GEE, Circuit Judges.
Rule 18, 5th Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co., 431 F.2d 409 (5th Cir., 1970) Part I.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The precise questions raised by Pearson on this appeal from denial of 28 U.S.C. § 2255 relief regarding the constitutionality of the searches of his mail have been already litigated and determined adversely to his contentions on his direct appeal. 517 F.2d 350 (1975). We reject petitioner's attempt to impose upon us such a "purposeless duplication of the review process." See Blackwell v. United States, 429 F.2d 514, 516 (5th Cir. 1970).
AFFIRMED.