Case Name: City of New York, Respondent, v. State of New York, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1976-07-01
Citations: 39 N.Y.2d 951
Docket Number: Claim No. 53715
Parties: City of New York, Respondent, v State of New York, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 39
Pages: 951–953

Head Matter:
City of New York, Respondent, v State of New York, Appellant.
(Claim No. 53715.)
Argued June 2, 1976;
decided July 1, 1976
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Joseph F. Gibbons, Ruth Kessler Toch and Grace K. Banoff of counsel), for appellant.
W. Bernard Richland, Corporation Counsel (Morris Einhorn and L. Kevin Sheridan of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
Order affirmed, with costs, on the opinion by then Presiding Justice J. Clarence Herlihy at the Appellate Division (48 AD2d 79). We also note that the question of timeliness argued by the State was raised for the first time at the Appellate Division. Since this issue was not presented to the Court of Claims it has not been preserved for our review.
Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke.