Case Name: KARELS v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1922-06-21
Citations: 243 S.W. 985
Docket Number: No. 7106
Parties: KARELS v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 243
Pages: 985–986

Head Matter:
KARELS v. STATE.
(No. 7106.)
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
June 21, 1922.
Rehearing Denied Oct. 11, 1922.)
On Motion for Rehearing.
1. Indictment and information <⅞=>203 — That indictment contained other counts did not affect conviction on valid count.
That an indictment contained other counts based on a repealed statute did not affect a conviction on a valid' count for manufacturing liquor, the law relating to which has not been changed.
2. Criminal law @=»10&7(l) — Error in argument not considered without statement of facts.
Alleged error of the county attorney in his argument cannot be considered, when the record contains no statement of facts.
Appeal from District Court, Palls County; Prentice Oltorf, Judge.
Pred Karels was convicted of the unlawful manufacture of intoxicating liquor, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
Prank Oltorf, of Marlin, for appellant.
R. G. Storey, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Opinion:
MORROW, P. J.
Conviction is for the unlawful manufacture of intoxicating liquor; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.
The record is accompanied by neither bill of exceptions nor statement of facts, and no fundamental error appears.The judgment is affirmed.
/rt — >T?nr other cases see same topic and KD Y-NXJMBEP. in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes