Case Name: FRANKLIN UNION NO. 23, Inc., v. BERRY et al.
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1914-05-08
Citations: 147 N.Y.S. 1112
Docket Number: No. 5783
Parties: FRANKLIN UNION NO. 23, Inc., v. BERRY et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 147
Pages: 1112–1113

Head Matter:
FRANKLIN UNION NO. 23, Inc., v. BERRY et al.
(No. 5783.)
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
May 8, 1914.)
Appeal from Special Term, New York County. Action by Franklin Union No. 23, Incorporated, against George L. Berry, individually and as president of the International Printing 'Pressmen and Assistants’ Union of North America, and others. From so much of an order as denies a motion for an injunction, plaintiff appeals; and from the parts of the order which grant plaintiff an injunction, defendants appeal. Affirmed. Theodore H. Lord, of New York City, for plaintiff. Alfred Steckler, of New York City, for defendants.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Without concurring in the reasons expressed at Special Term for denying the plaintiff's motion for an injunction, and without expressing any opinion as to whether or not the plaintiff would, after the trial of the action, be entitled to a judgment securing the exclusive right to use its corporate name, this order upon the plaintiff's appeal is affirmed, leaving question as to the judgment to which the plaintiff will be entitled to be settled upon the trial of the action. Upon the appeal of the defendants from that part of the order granting an injunction, we think the court below was right, and that the order, so far as appealed from, should be affirmed. The order is therefore affirmed, without costs to either party upon this appeal.