Case Name: David C. DIEMER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-10-04
Citations: 448 F. App'x 385
Docket Number: No. 11-1522
Parties: David C. DIEMER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 448
Pages: 385–386

Head Matter:
David C. DIEMER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 11-1522.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 29, 2011.
Decided: Oct. 4, 2011.
David C. Diemer, Appellant Pro Se. Gilbert Steven Rothenberg, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Robert William Metzler, Laurie Allyn Snyder, United States Department of Justice, Tax Division, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
David C. Diemer appeals the tax court's order sustaining the Commissioner's collection determination and imposing sanctions pursuant to I.R.C. § 6673 (2006). We have reviewed the record and the tax's court opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. Diemer v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, Tax Ct. No. 13123-10L (U.S. Tax Ct. Feb. 16, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.