Case Name: Dr. Nolan L. KINSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SALADO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1991-02-19
Citations: 925 F.2d 118
Docket Number: No. 89-1717
Parties: Dr. Nolan L. KINSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SALADO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before CLARK, Chief Judge, POLITZ, KING, JOHNSON, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHÉ, WIENER and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 925
Pages: 118–119

Head Matter:
Dr. Nolan L. KINSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SALADO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 89-1717.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Feb. 19, 1991.
Lynn Wade Malone, Charles M. McDonald, McDonald, Harmon & Malone, Waco, Tex., for plaintiff-appellant.
William C. Bednar, Jr., Eskew, Muir & Bednar, Austin, Tex., for defendants-appel-lees.
Judge Thomas Gibbs Gee was a member of the panel that decided this case but resigned from the Court on February 1, 1991 and, therefore, did not participate in this decision.

Opinion:
ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, POLITZ, KING, JOHNSON, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHÉ, WIENER and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.