Case Name: Peter F. Pantlin et al., Plaintiffs, and Perinton Associates, Appellant, v. Heicklen Farms, Inc., et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1980-02-07
Citations: 49 N.Y.2d 760
Docket Number: 
Parties: Peter F. Pantlin et al., Plaintiffs, and Perinton Associates, Appellant, v Heicklen Farms, Inc., et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 49
Pages: 760–760

Head Matter:
Peter F. Pantlin et al., Plaintiffs, and Perinton Associates, Appellant, v Heicklen Farms, Inc., et al., Respondents.
Submitted January 21, 1980;
decided February 7, 1980

Opinion:
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the orders sought to be appealed from do not finally determine the consolidated action within the meaning of the Constitution (see Lizza Inds. v Long Is. Light. Co., 36 NY2d 754).