Case Name: Sarbjit SINGH, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-09-23
Citations: 109 F. App'x 930
Docket Number: No. 03-71292; Agency No. A75-262-424
Parties: Sarbjit SINGH, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before PREGERSON, KOZINSKI and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 109
Pages: 930–931

Head Matter:
Sarbjit SINGH, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 03-71292.
Agency No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 9, 2004.
Decided Sept. 23, 2004.
Anthony Nwosu, Law Offices of Anthony Nwosu, Emeryville, CA, for Petitioner.
Regional Counsel, Western Region, Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Andrew C. MacLachlan, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before PREGERSON, KOZINSKI and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Substantial evidence supported the immigration judge's finding, adopted and affirmed by the BIA, that Singh was not credible. See Alvarez-Santos v. INS, 332 F.3d 1245, 1254 (9th Cir.2003). The immigration judge pointed to specific inconsistencies going to the heart of Singh's claim. See Singh v. Ashcroft, 301 F.3d 1109, 1111-12 (9th Cir.2002).
DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.