Case Name: Starsha SEWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, in care of Chicago Title Insurance Company, Milestone Title, LLC; Chicago Title Insurance Company; Milestone Title, LLC, Defendants-Appellees; Starsha Sewell, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Fidelity National Financial, in care of Chicago Title Insurance Company, Milestone Title, LLC, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-09-13
Citations: 668 F. App'x 510
Docket Number: No. 16-1352, No. 16-1354
Parties: Starsha SEWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, in care of Chicago Title Insurance Company, Milestone Title, LLC; Chicago Title Insurance Company; Milestone Title, LLC, Defendants-Appellees. Starsha Sewell, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Fidelity National Financial, in care of Chicago Title Insurance Company, Milestone Title, LLC, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 668
Pages: 510–510

Head Matter:
Starsha SEWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, in care of Chicago Title Insurance Company, Milestone Title, LLC; Chicago Title Insurance Company; Milestone Title, LLC, Defendants-Appellees. Starsha Sewell, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Fidelity National Financial, in care of Chicago Title Insurance Company, Milestone Title, LLC, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 16-1352, No. 16-1354
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: September 9, 2016
Decided: September 13, 2016
Starsha Sewell, Appellant Pro Se. Michael William Tompkins, FIDELITY NATIONAL LAW GROUP, Vienna, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Starsha Sewell appeals the district court's orders dismissing these civil actions and denying her motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Fidelity Nat'l Financial, Nos. 8:15-cv-03077-PWG; 8:15-cv-03392-PWG, 2016 WL 728012 (D. Md. Oct. 23 & Nov. 19, 2015; Jan. 5, Feb. 24, Mar. 22 & Mar. 24, 2016). The motions to strike the supplemental appendix and to seal are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED