Case Name: JANE MAX ET AL., INFANTS, ETC., RESPONDENTS, v. R. ROBERT MAX, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1940-10-10
Citations: 125 N.J.L. 271
Docket Number: 
Parties: JANE MAX ET AL., INFANTS, ETC., RESPONDENTS, v. R. ROBERT MAX, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 125
Pages: 271–272

Head Matter:
JANE MAX ET AL., INFANTS, ETC., RESPONDENTS, v. R. ROBERT MAX, APPELLANT.
Submitted May 31, 1940
Decided October 10, 1940.
For the respondents, Collins & Corbin.
For the appellant, Townsend & Doyle.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered'by Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Paekee, Bodine, Pbeskie, Deae, WolesKeil, Raeeeety, JJ. 7.
For reversal — Case, Hbhee, Wells, Hague, JJ. 4. '