Case Name: Wilma E. Gould, Respondent, v. Norman J. Gould and Others, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1935-11
Citations: 246 A.D. 573
Docket Number: 
Parties: Wilma E. Gould, Respondent, v. Norman J. Gould and Others, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 246
Pages: 573–573

Head Matter:
Wilma E. Gould, Respondent, v. Norman J. Gould and Others, Appellants.

Opinion:
Action for damages due to conspiracy among defendants to terminate obligation of a separation agreement between plaintiff and Edward B. Gould and to obtain a divorce. The large sum allowed as damages in this case may be accounted for only by the fact that the jury was influenced by incompetent evidence admitted during the trial — particularly the testimony in the insanity proceeding against all the defendants. Judgment and order unanimously reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event. Present — Martin, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, O'Malley and Glennon, JJ.