Case Name: David HAIGHT, et ux., Respondents, v. DRIVETIME CAR SALES COMPANY, LLC d/b/a DriveTime, Appellant.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2018-05-29
Citations: 555 S.W.3d 478
Docket Number: WD 81164
Parties: David HAIGHT, et ux., Respondents,
v.
DRIVETIME CAR SALES COMPANY, LLC d/b/a DriveTime, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 555
Pages: 478–479

Head Matter:
David HAIGHT, et ux., Respondents,
v.
DRIVETIME CAR SALES COMPANY, LLC d/b/a DriveTime, Appellant.
WD 81164
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
ORDER FILED: May 29, 2018
Motion for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 3, 2018
Application for Transfer Denied September 25, 2018
Bryce B. Bell and Mark W. Schmitz, Kansas City, MO, Attorneys for Respondents.
Brian A. Jackson, Michael J. Cappo, and Molly S. Carella, Kansas City, MO, Attorneys for Appellant.
Before Division IV: Mark D. Pfeiffer, Chief Judge, and Gary D. Witt and Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judges
Order

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
DriveTime Car Sales Company, LLC appeals from the ruling of the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, denying its motion to compel David and Gifty Haight to arbitrate their claims against DriveTime for malicious prosecution, abuse of process, and violation of the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. The Circuit Court's ruling is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).