Case Name: William Mark O'ROARK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOS ANGELES COUNTY JAIL; Calipatria State Prison, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-03-29
Citations: 6 F. App'x 650
Docket Number: No. 99-56023; D.C. No. CV-98-07470-RSWL
Parties: William Mark O’ROARK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOS ANGELES COUNTY JAIL; Calipatria State Prison, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before GOODWIN, LEAVY, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 6
Pages: 650–650

Head Matter:
William Mark O’ROARK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOS ANGELES COUNTY JAIL; Calipatria State Prison, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 99-56023. D.C. No. CV-98-07470-RSWL.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 12, 2001 .
Decided March 29, 2001.
Before GOODWIN, LEAVY, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
William Mark O'Roark, a california state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's judgment dismissing his complaint as barred by the statute of limitations. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo and affirm. See Fink v. Shedler, 192 F.3d 911, 913-14 (9th Cir.1999); Bagley v. CMC Real Estate Corp., 923 F.2d 758, 760 (9th Cir.1991).
AFFIRMED.
. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.