Case Name: LIZZIE H. GLIDE, Appellant, v. CITY OF SACRAMENTO (a Municipal Corporation), Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1928-07-11
Citations: 204 Cal. 702
Docket Number: Sac. No. 3995
Parties: LIZZIE H. GLIDE, Appellant, v. CITY OF SACRAMENTO (a Municipal Corporation), Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Reports
Volume: 204
Pages: 702–702

Head Matter:
[Sac. No. 3995.
Department One.
July 11, 1928.]
LIZZIE H. GLIDE, Appellant, v. CITY OF SACRAMENTO (a Municipal Corporation), Respondent.
Huston, Huston & Huston, for Appellant.
R. L. Shinn for Respondent.

Opinion:
THE COURT.
The order granting defendant's motion for a change of venue in this action is affirmed on the authority of Finance & Construction Co. of California v. City of Sacramento, ante, p. 491 [269 Pac. 167]. The only difference in the two cases is that in this case the plaintiff is a private person, while in case No. 3996 the plaintiff is a corporation. This difference is not material to any question involved herein.
Hearing in Bank denied.
All the Justices present concurred.