Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerry Arbert POOL, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-09-19
Citations: 659 F.3d 761
Docket Number: No. 09-10303
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerry Arbert POOL, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: ALEX KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, HARRY PREGERSON, PAMELA ANN RYMER, SUSAN P. GRABER, WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, RICHARD A. PAEZ, CARLOS T. BEA, MILAN D. SMITH, JR., SANDRA S. IKUTA, N. RANDY SMITH and MARY H. MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 659
Pages: 761–762

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerry Arbert POOL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-10303.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Sept. 19, 2011.
Robert A. Parker, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Phillip A. Talbert, Assistant U.S. Attorney, US-SAC-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Sacramento, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Rachelle Barbour, Esquire, FPDCAFederal Public Defender’s Office, Sacramento, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: ALEX KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, HARRY PREGERSON, PAMELA ANN RYMER, SUSAN P. GRABER, WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, RICHARD A. PAEZ, CARLOS T. BEA, MILAN D. SMITH, JR., SANDRA S. IKUTA, N. RANDY SMITH and MARY H. MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
We have been advised that Pool has entered a guilty plea. The parties agree there is no longer a live controversy, and the case is moot. See In re Pattullo, 271 F.3d 898, 900 (9th Cir.2001) ("If a case becomes moot while pending on appeal, it must be dismissed."). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal, vacate the panel's opinion, vacate the district court's and magistrate judge's orders and remand with instructions to dismiss the action. See United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 39, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).
The oral argument set for September 20, 2011 in San Francisco, California is vacated.