Case Name: William M. Hoes, as Public Administrator, etc., as Administrator, etc., of Alexander Hume, Deceased, Appellant, v. Thomas Hume, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1896-05
Citations: 5 A.D. 620
Docket Number: 
Parties: William M. Hoes, as Public Administrator, etc., as Administrator, etc., of Alexander Hume, Deceased, Appellant, v. Thomas Hume, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 5
Pages: 620–620

Head Matter:
William M. Hoes, as Public Administrator, etc., as Administrator, etc., of Alexander Hume, Deceased, Appellant, v. Thomas Hume, Respondent.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
The rule laid down upon the previous appeal (Stebbins v Hume, 16 N. Y. St. Repr. 128) is the law of this case, so far as this court is concerned. The trial judge ruled precisely in accordance with the views there expressed by the General Term. We should, therefore, affirm his ruling. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs. Present — Van Brunt, P. J., Barrett, Rumsey, O'Brien and Ingraham, JJ.