Case Name: Alfred B. Dixon vs. Helena M. Gallon
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1926-05-07
Citations: 104 Conn. 740
Docket Number: 
Parties: Alfred B. Dixon vs. Helena M. Gallon.
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 104
Pages: 740–741

Head Matter:
Alfred B. Dixon vs. Helena M. Gallon.
Third Judicial District, Bridgeport,
April Term, 1926.
Wheeler, C. J., Curtis, Maltbie, Haines and Hinman, Js.
Argued April 14th
decided May 7th, 1926.
Robert J. Woodruff, for the appellant (defendant).
James C. Shannon, for the appellee (plaintiff).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The errors assigned in the appeal are from rulings on evidence and from the charge as made. Since neither appellant, nor appellee, filed a statement of what each offered evidence to prove and claimed to have proved, the trial court should have either required the parties to comply with the rules, or have refused to make a finding. It is impossible for us to pass upon either the rulings on evidence or the parts of the charge complained of without having before us a statement of the facts which each party claimed to have proved and offered evidence to prove.
The appeal is dismissed.