Case Name: In the Matter of the Compensation of James E. Craft, Claimant. James E. CRAFT, Petitioner, v. WOOD PRODUCTS CREDIT UNION and TIG Insurance Company, Respondents
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2002-09-25
Citations: 183 Or. App. 658
Docket Number: 00-02012; A112692
Parties: In the Matter of the Compensation of James E. Craft, Claimant. James E. CRAFT, Petitioner, v. WOOD PRODUCTS CREDIT UNION and TIG Insurance Company, Respondents.
Judges: Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Linder and Wollheim, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 183
Pages: 658–658

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted August 15,
affirmed September 25, 2002
In the Matter of the Compensation of James E. Craft, Claimant. James E. CRAFT, Petitioner, v. WOOD PRODUCTS CREDIT UNION and TIG Insurance Company, Respondents.
00-02012; A112692
54 P3d 124
Edward J. Harri argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was David A. Vinson.
Jerald P. Keene argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents.
Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Linder and Wollheim, Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Affirmed. Tinh Xuan Pham Auto v. Bourgo, 143 Or App 73, 922 P2d 1255 (1996).