Case Name: Mikie L. BELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. C/O SPENCE; C/O Dockey; C/O Owens; Sargeant Blowe, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-01-21
Citations: 361 F. App'x 493
Docket Number: No. 09-7823
Parties: Mikie L. BELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. C/O SPENCE; C/O Dockey; C/O Owens; Sargeant Blowe, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 361
Pages: 493–493

Head Matter:
Mikie L. BELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. C/O SPENCE; C/O Dockey; C/O Owens; Sargeant Blowe, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 09-7823.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 14, 2010.
Decided: Jan. 21, 2010.
Mikie L. Bell, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Andrew Regulski, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appel-lees.
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Mikie L. Bell appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bell v. C/O Spence, No. 5:07-ct-03085-D (E.D.N.C. Sept. 14, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.