Case Name: Virgil Raymond STEWART, Jr., Appellant v. The STATE of Texas
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 2006-12-13
Citations: 209 S.W.3d 127
Docket Number: No. PD-0787-06
Parties: Virgil Raymond STEWART, Jr., Appellant v. The STATE of Texas.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 209
Pages: 127–128

Head Matter:
Virgil Raymond STEWART, Jr., Appellant v. The STATE of Texas.
No. PD-0787-06.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.
Dec. 13, 2006.
Page Janik, Houston, for Appellant.
Dan McCrory, Asst. District Atty., Houston, Matthew Paul, State’s Atty., Austin, for State.

Opinion:
OPINION
PER CURIAM.
Appellant was convicted of possession of methamphetamine and sentenced to thirty-five years imprisonment. The Court of Appeals reversed, finding the evidence factually insufficient to affirmatively link Appellant to the methamphetamine. Stewart v. State, 187 S.W.3d 249 (Tex.App.El Paso, 2006). The State petitioned this Court for discretionary review.
When the Court of Appeals issued its opinion in this case, it did so without the benefit of this Court's recent opinion in Watson v. State, 204 S.W.3d 404 (Tex.CrimApp., 2006). Therefore, we vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand for that court to consider the ef- feet of Watson, if any, on its reasoning and analysis in this case.