Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tarus D. OWENS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-01-26
Citations: 2 F. App'x 382
Docket Number: No. 00-7113
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tarus D. OWENS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 2
Pages: 382–382

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tarus D. OWENS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 00-7113.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 20, 2000.
Decided Jan. 26, 2001.
Tarus D. Owens, pro se. Harvey Lee Bryant, III, Assistant United States Attorney, Robert Francis Porcarelli, Office of the United States Attorney, Norfolk, VA, for appellee.
Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Tarus D. Owens appeals the district court's order construing his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion as a 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000) motion and dismissing the motion as successive. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Owens, Nos. CR-97-150; CA-00-135 (E.D.Va. June 27, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.