Case Name: Philip NEWMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-09-12
Citations: 566 So. 2d 372
Docket Number: No. 89-2508
Parties: Philip NEWMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: HERSEY, C.J., and STONE and POLEN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 566
Pages: 372–372

Head Matter:
Philip NEWMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 89-2508.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Sept. 12, 1990.
Arthur P. Cohen, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and Miles Ferris, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We hold that appellant's motion for post-conviction relief as originally filed adequately specifies the facts supporting the motion, as Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 requires. We reverse the trial court's order denying the amended motion, and remand for consideration of the motion on its merits.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
HERSEY, C.J., and STONE and POLEN, JJ., concur.