Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David W. MARIANI, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-08-28
Citations: 199 F. App'x 641
Docket Number: No. 04-30463
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. David W. MARIANI, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: GOODWIN, REINHARDT, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 199
Pages: 641–642

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. David W. MARIANI, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 04-30463.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 21, 2006.
Filed Aug. 28, 2006.
Bernard F. Hubley, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Helena, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Anthony R. Gallagher, Esq., Great Falls, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: GOODWIN, REINHARDT, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
David W. Mariani appeals from the sentence imposed upon revocation of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Because Mariani failed to object to his sentence, we review for plain error. See United States v. Garcia, 323 F.3d 1161, 1165 (9th Cir. 2003). We affirm.
Mariani contends that, upon revocation of his supervised release, the district court erred by imposing a sentence "greater than necessary" to address his violations. We disagree.
Because the district court considered factors recommended by Chapter 7 of the Guidelines Manual and because we are convinced that the sentence was not unreasonable, there was no error. See United States v. Plouffe, 445 F.3d 1126, 1131 (9th Cir.2006).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.