Case Name: In the Interest of E.F., K.F., and F.F., Respondent, Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. L.R. (Mother), Appellant, M.R. (Father), Defendant; G.M. (Father), Defendant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-06-19
Citations: 48 S.W.3d 111
Docket Number: No. WD 59055
Parties: In the Interest of E.F., K.F., and F.F., Respondent, Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. L.R. (Mother), Appellant, M.R. (Father), Defendant; G.M. (Father), Defendant.
Judges: Before EDWIN H. SMITH, P.J.; JAMES M. SMART, JR., and VICTOR HOWARD, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 48
Pages: 111–111

Head Matter:
In the Interest of E.F., K.F., and F.F., Respondent, Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. L.R. (Mother), Appellant, M.R. (Father), Defendant; G.M. (Father), Defendant.
No. WD 59055.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Submitted May 23, 2001.
Decided June 19, 2001.
E. David Swartzbaugh, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant.
John B. Gillis, Kansas City, MO, for respondent children.
Michael R. Fogal, Kansas City, MO, for Respondent Juvenile Officer.
Before EDWIN H. SMITH, P.J.; JAMES M. SMART, JR., and VICTOR HOWARD, JJ.

Opinion:
Order
PER CURIAM:
L.R., the natural mother of three children, appeals the trial court's termination of her parental rights in the children. She contends that the decision was against the weight of the evidence and was not supported by sufficient competent evidence that she had failed to rectify her circumstances and increase her parental skills to provide a proper home for the children.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).