Case Name: FIRE FIGHTER SALES AND SERVICE CO., d/b/a All Lines Technology Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRAVELERS CASUALTY and Surety Company of America, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-12-20
Citations: 671 F. App'x 374
Docket Number: No. 15-4151
Parties: FIRE FIGHTER SALES AND SERVICE CO., d/b/a All Lines Technology Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRAVELERS CASUALTY and Surety Company of America, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: BEFORE: DAUGHTERY, GIBBONS, and COOK, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 671
Pages: 374–375

Head Matter:
FIRE FIGHTER SALES AND SERVICE CO., d/b/a All Lines Technology Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRAVELERS CASUALTY and Surety Company of America, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 15-4151
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Filed December 20, 2016
Michael T. Altvater, Babst, Calland, Clements & Zomnir, Canton, OH, David E. White, Babst, .Calland, Clements & Zom-nir, Pittsburgh, PA, for Plaintiff-Appellant
John R. Christie, Stefanik & Christie, Cleveland, OH, for Defendant-Appellee
BEFORE: DAUGHTERY, GIBBONS, and COOK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Fire Fighter Sales and Service Co. appeals the district court's decision granting Travelers Casualty and Surety's motion for summary judgment. Having reviewed the record, the applicable law, and the parties' briefs, we are not persuaded that the district court erred. Because the district court fully articulated the reasons why judgment should be entered for Travelers, the issuance of a detailed opinion by this court would be duplicative and would serve no useful purpose. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court upon the reasoning set out by that court in its order and opinion entered on September 30, 2015.