Case Name: State of Connecticut v. John Yurch
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1993-09-15
Citations: 227 Conn. 910
Docket Number: SC 14831
Parties: State of Connecticut v. John Yurch
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 227
Pages: 910–911

Head Matter:
State of Connecticut v. John Yurch

Opinion:
The state of Connecticut's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 31 Conn. App. 688 (AC 11282), is granted, limited to the following issues:
"1. Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the judgment of the trial court by holding that this court's decision in State v. Tatem, 194 Conn. 594, establishes that the trial court's use of the word 'unreasonable' in place of 'unfavorable' in instructing the jury under General Statutes § 54-84 (b) automatically requires reversal and a new trial?
The Supreme Court docket number is SC 14831.
Decided September 15, 1993
Stephen R. Park, assistant attorney general-special assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition.
"2. If the answer to question 1. is no, was the trial court's misstatement of the word 'unreasonable' in charging the jury under General Statutes § 54-84 (b), when viewed in the context of the jury charge as a whole and the evidence in the case, harmless beyond a reasonable doubt?"