Case Name: TAMPA ARMATURE WORKS, INC., Cross-Appellant, v. TOM QUINN COMPANY, INC., d/b/a Bay Machine, Cross-Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-05-10
Citations: 654 So. 2d 304
Docket Number: Nos. 93-2636, 93-3096
Parties: TAMPA ARMATURE WORKS, INC., Cross-Appellant, v. TOM QUINN COMPANY, INC., d/b/a Bay Machine, Cross-Appellee.
Judges: HERSEY, GLICKSTEIN and POLEN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 654
Pages: 304–304

Head Matter:
TAMPA ARMATURE WORKS, INC., Cross-Appellant, v. TOM QUINN COMPANY, INC., d/b/a Bay Machine, Cross-Appellee.
Nos. 93-2636, 93-3096.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
May 10, 1995.
H. Hugh McConnell and Peter H. Edwards of Siegfried, Rivera, Lerner, De La Torree & Petersen, P.A., Coral Gables, for cross-appellant.
No brief filed for cross-appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
As to Case No. 93-2636, this court relinquished jurisdiction to the trial court to permit the trial court to rule on the amended motion to correct judgment. The trial court then entered an Amended Final Judgment on December 22, 1993, which resolved the issues in Case No. 93-2636.
As to Case No. 93-3096, we disagree with the trial court's reasoning that a clause in a contract crafted in language more commonly encountered in "save harmless" or "indemnity" clauses does not also constitute a valid and enforceable prevailing-party attorney's fees provision. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for reconsideration of cross-appellant's motion for attorney's fees as the prevailing party in the trial court.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
HERSEY, GLICKSTEIN and POLEN, JJ., concur.