Case Name: Randal MAUDERER Plaintiff-Appellant v. IOWA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE, et al. Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-03-28
Citations: 681 F. App'x 572
Docket Number: No. 16-3866
Parties: Randal MAUDERER Plaintiff-Appellant v. IOWA ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE, et al. Defendants-Appellees
Judges: Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 681
Pages: 572–573

Head Matter:
Randal MAUDERER Plaintiff-Appellant v. IOWA ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE, et al. Defendants-Appellees
No. 16-3866
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: March 23, 2017
Filed: March 28, 2017
Randal Mauderer, Pro Se
Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Randal Mauderer appeals after the district court dismissed his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, in which he alleged that his recommended participation in a Sex Offender Treatment Program violated his constitutional rights; and that the conditions of his exercise privileges while in segregation violated both his constitutional rights and the Americans with Disabilities Act. We conclude that the action was properly dismissed for the reasons stated by the district court. See Cooper v. Schriro, 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam) (§ 1915A(b) dismissal is reviewed de novo). Accordingly, we affirm, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and we deny the appellate motions.
. The Honorable Rebecca Ebinger, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.