Case Name: Cora HOUSTON, Appellant v. SECTEK, INC., Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-01-31
Citations: 407 F. App'x 490
Docket Number: No. 10-7022
Parties: Cora HOUSTON, Appellant v. SECTEK, INC., Appellee.
Judges: BEFORE: SENTELLE, Chief Judge, and HENDERSON and GARLAND, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 407
Pages: 490–491

Head Matter:
Cora HOUSTON, Appellant v. SECTEK, INC., Appellee.
No. 10-7022.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Jan. 31, 2011.
Lisa Alexis Jones, Esquire, Lisa Alexis Jones, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Appellant.
Alan S. Block, Andrew Butz, Bonner Kiernan Trebach & Crociata, LLP, Washington, DC, for Appellee.
BEFORE: SENTELLE, Chief Judge, and HENDERSON and GARLAND, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.
This case was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs and arguments by counsel. It is
ORDERED that the judgment of the district court be affirmed.
Appellant Cora Houston, a black female, brought suit under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 against her former employer, SecTek, Inc., alleging race-based disparate treatment, hostile work environment and constructive discharge. The district court granted summary judgment to SecTek. For the reasons stated in the district court's memorandum opinion filed January 28, 2010, we affirm.
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41(a)(1).