Case Name: Lennard LaPoint JENKINS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2001-03-15
Citations: 781 So. 2d 1083
Docket Number: No. SC00-310
Parties: Lennard LaPoint JENKINS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ„ concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 781
Pages: 1083–1084

Head Matter:
Lennard LaPoint JENKINS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. SC00-310.
Supreme Court of Florida.
March 15, 2001.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and S.C. Van Voorhees and Barbara C. Davis, Assistant Public Defenders, Seventh Judicial Circuit, Daytona Beach, FL, for Petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Kellie A. Nielan, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorneys General, Daytona Beach, FL, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted review of Jenkins v. State, 747 So.2d 997 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999), on the basis of an alleged express and direct conflict with our decision in State v. Houck, 652 So.2d 359 (Fla.1995). See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted in this case. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss review of this cause.
It is so ordered.
WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ" concur.