Case Name: Locki FIELDS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-10-04
Citations: 768 So. 2d 1220
Docket Number: No. 4D00-2002
Parties: Locki FIELDS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: STONE, SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 768
Pages: 1220–1221

Head Matter:
Locki FIELDS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D00-2002.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Oct. 4, 2000.
Locki Fields, Bushnell, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Steven R. Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant Locki Fields filed a motion to correct illegal sentence claiming that his sentence for delivery of cocaine within 1,000 feet of a school was the product of the 1995 amendments to the sentencing guidelines, declared unconstitutional in Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000) and State v. Thompson, 750 So.2d 643 (Fla.1999).
The trial court summarily denied his motion, finding that he lacked standing, but the Supreme Court's decision in Trapp v. State, 760 So.2d 924 (Fla.2000) now demonstrates that this was erroneous. We find that the motion filed in this case was legally sufficient. We cannot determine on the record presented whether appellant was "adversely affected" as defined by the Supreme Court in Heggs, when it said that if a person's sentence imposed under the 1995 guidelines could have been imposed under the 1994 guidelines (without a departure), then that person is not entitled to sentencing relief. Therefore, we reverse the trial court's order erroneously denying relief for lack of standing, and remand to the trial court for further consideration of appellant's sentencing challenge under these prevailing authorities.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
STONE, SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.