Case Name: IN the INTEREST OF: N.M. and D.M.; Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. S.M. (Mother) and E.M. (Father), Appellants
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2015-08-25
Citations: 468 S.W.3d 906
Docket Number: WD 78488
Parties: IN the INTEREST OF: N.M. and D.M.; Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. S.M. (Mother) and E.M. (Father), Appellants.
Judges: Before Division One: Cynthia L. Martin, Presiding Judge, Joseph M. Ellis, Judge and James E. Welsh, Judge
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 468
Pages: 906–907

Head Matter:
IN the INTEREST OF: N.M. and D.M.; Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. S.M. (Mother) and E.M. (Father), Appellants.
WD 78488
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
ORDER FILED: August 25, 2015
Edward E. Moore, Kansas City, MO, for respondent.
Dana M. Outlaw, Lee’s Summit, MO, for appellants.
Before Division One: Cynthia L. Martin, Presiding Judge, Joseph M. Ellis, Judge and James E. Welsh, Judge

Opinion:
ORDER
Per curiam:
The parents of two children appeal a judgment terminating them parental rights, arguing that no substantial evidence was presented showing that termi nation of parental rights was in the children's best interests. Because substantial evidence was presented which supports the trial court's conclusion that termination of parental rights was in the children's best interests, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).