Case Name: Hattie C. THOMBS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF GREENVILLE COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-07-07
Citations: 138 F. App'x 535
Docket Number: No. 05-1063
Parties: Hattie C. THOMBS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF GREEN-VILLE COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 138
Pages: 535–535

Head Matter:
Hattie C. THOMBS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF GREEN-VILLE COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 05-1063.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 17, 2005.
Decided: July 7, 2005.
Hattie C. Thombs, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Mark Wynkoop, Giles Martin Schanen, Jr., Nelson, Mullins, Riley & Scarborough, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Hattie C. Thombs appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to the Defendant on her claims of failure to accommodate under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 to 12213 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Thombs v. School District of Greenville Cnty, No. CA-02-3055-6-26 (D.S.C. Dec. 10, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED