Case Name: In the Interest of D.A.G. and T.G., children. D.Z. and D.P., Appellants, v. Department of Children and Family Services, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2004-07-30
Citations: 878 So. 2d 482
Docket Number: No. 2D03-4375
Parties: In the Interest of D.A.G. and T.G., children. D.Z. and D.P., Appellants, v. Department of Children and Family Services, Appellee.
Judges: DAVIS, CANADY, and WALLACE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 878
Pages: 482–483

Head Matter:
In the Interest of D.A.G. and T.G., children. D.Z. and D.P., Appellants, v. Department of Children and Family Services, Appellee.
No. 2D03-4375.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
July 30, 2004.
Eugene L. Beil of Beil & Hay, P.A., Hudson, for Appellants.
Bernie McCabe, State Attorney, and Andrea Lasker Bradford, Assistant State Attorney, Clearwater, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
D.Z. and D.P. (the Relatives), the maternal great-grandfather and the maternal grandmother, respectively, of D.A.G. and T.G., seek review of the trial court's nonfi-nal order denying their motion for visitation. We do not have jurisdiction to review this nonfinal order as an interlocutory appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.130(a)(3). However, we elect to treat the Relatives' timely filed notice of appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.040(c). We deny the petition. See Sullivan v. Sapp, 866 So.2d 28 (Fla.2004); A.D. v. KS. (In re S.D.), 869 So.2d 39 (Fla. 2d DCA2004).
Petition denied.
DAVIS, CANADY, and WALLACE, JJ., concur.