Case Name: Lucy A. Boardman et al., Appellants, v. City of Spokane et al., Respondents
Court: Washington Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Washington
Decision Date: 1899-01-21
Citations: 20 Wash. 715
Docket Number: No. 3191
Parties: Lucy A. Boardman et al., Appellants, v. City of Spokane et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Washington Reports
Volume: 20
Pages: 715–715

Head Matter:
[No. 3191.
Decided January 21, 1899.]
Lucy A. Boardman et al., Appellants, v. City of Spokane et al., Respondents.
Appeal from Superior Court, Spokane County.—Hon William E. Richardson, Judge.
Affirmed.
Lewis & Lewis, for appellants.
A. G. Avery, for respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The allegations of error in this case are (1) That a writ of review was not the proper remedy; and (2) that even though the writ was a proper one, the record did not show such a state of facts as under the law would entitle the plaintiffs to any relief.
Without passing on the first proposition, we are satisfied that under the law as announced by a long line of recent decisions on the subject of street assessments, the judgment in this case was correct. It will, therefore, be affirmed.