Case Name: Gary YODER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Janet NAPOLITANO, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-04-21
Citations: 274 F. App'x 576
Docket Number: No. 07-16865
Parties: Gary YODER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Janet NAPOLITANO, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 274
Pages: 576–576

Head Matter:
Gary YODER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Janet NAPOLITANO, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 07-16865.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 15, 2008.
Filed April 21, 2008.
Gary Yoder, ASPCF — Arizona State Prison Complex, Florence, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Alice Jolynn Rogers, Esq., AGAZ — Office of the Arizona Attorney General, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before: B. FLETCHER, FISHER and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
A review of the record indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). It does not appear that the district court erred when it dismissed this case for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. See Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 126 S.Ct. 2378, 165 L.Ed.2d 368 (2006); Brown v. Valoff 422 F.3d 926, 934-35 (9th Cir.2005).
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.
All pending motions are denied as moot.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.