Case Name: Larry Arnold YOUNG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. D. THOMPSON, Correctional Officer; Duranko, S.I.S. Technician; D. Shaw, Lieutenant; Unknown Mail Room Personnel; D. Yost, I.S.O., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-12-20
Citations: 458 F. App'x 291
Docket Number: No. 11-7056
Parties: Larry Arnold YOUNG, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. D. THOMPSON, Correctional Officer; Duranko, S.I.S. Technician; D. Shaw, Lieutenant; Unknown Mail Room Personnel; D. Yost, I.S.O., Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 458
Pages: 291–292

Head Matter:
Larry Arnold YOUNG, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. D. THOMPSON, Correctional Officer; Duranko, S.I.S. Technician; D. Shaw, Lieutenant; Unknown Mail Room Personnel; D. Yost, I.S.O., Defendants—Appellees.
No. 11-7056.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 15, 2011.
Decided: Dec. 20, 2011.
Larry Arnold Young, Appellant Pro Se. Rita R. Valdrini, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Ap-pellees.
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Larry Arnold Young appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Young v. Thompson, No. 2:10-cv-00066-JPB-JSK, 2011 WL 3297493 (N.D.W.Va. July 29, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.