Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Abel CISNEROS-GUERRERO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-11-28
Citations: 704 F. App'x 785
Docket Number: No. 17-1246
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Abel CISNEROS-GUERRERO, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before LUCERO, HARTZ, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 704
Pages: 785–786

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Abel CISNEROS-GUERRERO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 17-1246
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
Filed November 28, 2017
(D.C. No. 1:17-CR-00031-RM-1) (D. Colorado)
Karl L. Schock, Office of the United States Attorney, District of Colorado, Denver, CO, for Plaintiff-Appellee
John C. Arced, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Districts of Colorado and Wyoming, Denver, CO, for Defendant-Appellant
Before LUCERO, HARTZ, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER AND JUDGMENT
Per Curiam
Abel Cisneros-Guerrero pleaded guilty to illegal reentry after removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 and was sentenced to 24 months in prison. He appeals that sentence even though his plea agreement included a broad waiver of his appellate rights. The government has moved to enforce the appeal waiver under United States v. Hahn, 359 F.3d 1315 (10th Cir. 2004) (en banc) (per curiam). Through his counsel, Mr. Cisneros-Guerrero concedes that the waiver bars his appeal. Based on this concession and our independent review of the record, we grant the government's motion and dismiss the appeal.
This panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this appeal. Sea Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.