Case Name: In the Interest of A.M.W., Appellant, v. JUVENILE OFFICER, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2013-05-21
Citations: 399 S.W.3d 497
Docket Number: No. WD 75280
Parties: In the Interest of A.M.W., Appellant, v. JUVENILE OFFICER, Respondent.
Judges: Before Division One: JAMES E. WELSH, Chief Judge, VICTOR C. HOWARD, Judge and MARK D. PFEIFFER, Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 399
Pages: 497–498

Head Matter:
In the Interest of A.M.W., Appellant, v. JUVENILE OFFICER, Respondent.
No. WD 75280.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
May 21, 2013.
Mary R. O’Neill, for Appellant.
Edward E. Moore, Kansas City, for Respondent.
Before Division One: JAMES E. WELSH, Chief Judge, VICTOR C. HOWARD, Judge and MARK D. PFEIFFER, Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
A.M.W., a juvenile, appeals the trial court's judgment sustaining allegations that she committed acts, which if she were an adult, would constitute the crime of deviate sexual assault, section 566.070, RSMo 2000. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).