Case Name: Lisa McKINNEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carolyn W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-12-18
Citations: 552 F. App'x 214
Docket Number: No. 13-1703
Parties: Lisa McKINNEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carolyn W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 552
Pages: 214–214

Head Matter:
Lisa McKINNEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carolyn W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 13-1703.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 26, 2013.
Decided: Dec. 18, 2013.
Sarah H. Bohr, Bohr & Harrington, LLC, Atlantic Beach, Florida; Paul Townsend McChesney, McChesney & McChes-ney, PC, Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Appellant. Paul B. Taylor, Assistant United States Attorney, Anne M. Tompkins, United States Attorney, Jeanne D. Semi-van, Assistant Regional Counsel, Social Security Administration, Boston, Massachusetts, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Lisa McKinney appeals the district court's orders: accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and upholding the Commissioner's decision denying McKinney's applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income; and denying her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McKinney v. Colvin, No. 1:1 l-cv-00199-MR-DLH, 2013 WL 300822 2013 WL 1320788 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 25 & Apr. 1, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.