Case Name: In the Matter of Cynthia Young, Appellant, v. William Fruci et al., Respondents, and Paul J. Sausville, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2013-12-31
Citations: 22 N.Y.3d 1037
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Cynthia Young, Appellant, v William Fruci et al., Respondents, and Paul J. Sausville, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 22
Pages: 1037–1037

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Cynthia Young, Appellant, v William Fruci et al., Respondents, and Paul J. Sausville, Respondent.
Submitted December 30, 2013;
decided December 31, 2013

Opinion:
Motion for leave to appeal denied. The Court of Appeals restates the rule that denial of a motion for leave to appeal is not equivalent to an affirmance and has no precedential value (see Matter of Marchant v Mead-Morrison Mfg. Co., 252 NY 284, 297-298 [1929, Cardozo, Ch. J.]).