Case Name: CITY OF MIAMI, Appellant, v. Sidney HARRIS, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1984-06-07
Citations: 452 So. 2d 115
Docket Number: No. AV-265
Parties: CITY OF MIAMI, Appellant, v. Sidney HARRIS, Appellee.
Judges: MILLS and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 452
Pages: 115–116

Head Matter:
CITY OF MIAMI, Appellant, v. Sidney HARRIS, Appellee.
No. AV-265.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
June 7, 1984.
Jose Garcia-Pedrosa, City Atty., and Jorge L. Fernandez, Asst. City Atty., Miami, for appellant.
Richard A. Sicking of Kaplan, Sicking, Hessen, Sugarman, Rosenthal, Susskind, Bloom & DeCastro, P.A., Miami, for appel-lee.

Opinion:
SHIVERS, Judge.
In this workers' compensation case, the self-insured employer appeals the deputy commissioner's order directing the employer to reimburse the claimant for the funds he expended in the purchase of a therapeutic hospital bed. The employer contends that the deputy improperly considered the terms of the contract entered into between the claimant's union and the employer in determining the claimant's entitlement to reimbursement. We disagree with the employer's contention. See Housknecht v. City of Dania, IRC Order 2-3276 (1977), cert. den., 377 So.2d 169 (Fla.1979); section 440.25(1), Florida Statutes (1978). Furthermore, we find that the bed was prescribed by an authorized, treating physician and was a reasonable and necessary medical expense. Compare Cedars of Lebanon Health Care v. Summerset, 409 So.2d 185 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). Accordingly, the deputy's order is AFFIRMED in all respects.
MILLS and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.