Case Name: Angel SANCHEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles S. WALTERS, III, Superintendent, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-02-13
Citations: 55 F. App'x 703
Docket Number: No. 02-7824
Parties: Angel SANCHEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles S. WALTERS, III, Superintendent, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 55
Pages: 703–703

Head Matter:
Angel SANCHEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles S. WALTERS, III, Superintendent, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 02-7824.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 6, 2003.
Decided Feb. 13, 2003.
John Clark Fischer, Randolph & Fischer, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellant. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Ap-pellee.
Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Angel Sanchez seeks to appeal the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Sanchez has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Sanchez v. Walters, No. CA-02-257-1 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 24, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.