Case Name: Henry Ittleson, Philip W. Haberman, Claud L. Hemphill, and Edwin C. Vogel, Trustees, Doing Business as The Commercial Investment Trust, Plaintiffs in Error, v. R. H. Hancock, Sheriff of Highlands County, Florida, Defendant in Error
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1924-11-06
Citations: 88 Fla. 304
Docket Number: 
Parties: Henry Ittleson, Philip W. Haberman, Claud L. Hemphill, and Edwin C. Vogel, Trustees, Doing Business as The Commercial Investment Trust, Plaintiffs in Error, v. R. H. Hancock, Sheriff of Highlands County, Florida, Defendant in Error.
Judges: Whitfield, P. J., and West and Terrell, J. J., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 88
Pages: 304–304

Head Matter:
Henry Ittleson, Philip W. Haberman, Claud L. Hemphill, and Edwin C. Vogel, Trustees, Doing Business as The Commercial Investment Trust, Plaintiffs in Error, v. R. H. Hancock, Sheriff of Highlands County, Florida, Defendant in Error.
Division B.
Decision Filed November 6, 1924.
A Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Polk County, John S. Edwards, Judge.
Walter D. Payne, for Plaintiffs in Error.
No appearance for Defendant in Error.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for plaintiffs in error, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and West and Terrell, J. J., concur.