Case Name: STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Ramon GONZALEZ, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1983-06-24
Citations: 433 So. 2d 646
Docket Number: No. 82-2403
Parties: STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Ramon GONZALEZ, Appellee.
Judges: HOBSON, A.C.J., SCHOONOVER and LEHAN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 433
Pages: 646–646

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Ramon GONZALEZ, Appellee.
No. 82-2403.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
June 24, 1983.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert J. Krauss, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellant.
Jerry Hill, Public Defender, Bartow, and Robert F. Moeller, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Ramon Gonzalez was indicted for murder in the first degree. Gonzalez filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.190(c)(4). The state filed a traverse admitting all allegations made by Gonzalez in his motion and offering additional facts to show the existence of a prima facie case of first degree murder. At the hearing on the motion, defense counsel argued that the undisputed facts failed to show evidence from which a jury could lawfully find premeditation. The trial court granted Gonzalez' motion to dismiss with leave for the state to refile a charge of second degree murder. The state appeals from the order dismissing the indictment. We reverse.
Under the facts of this case, the existence of the element of premeditation cannot be determined on a motion to dismiss under rule 3.190(c)(4). Intent or state of mind is to be inferred by the trier of fact from the defendant's acts and the surrounding circumstances. State v. Rogers, 386 So.2d 278 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); State v. J.T.S., 373 So.2d 418 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).
REVERSED.
HOBSON, A.C.J., SCHOONOVER and LEHAN, JJ., concur.