Case Name: Ronnie M. BELK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer DICKERHOFF, Defendant-Appellee, and Superintendent Sorrell Saunders; Assistant Superintendent Randy Turner; Sergeant McNeil, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-04-17
Citations: 274 F. App'x 239
Docket Number: No. 07-7363
Parties: Ronnie M. BELK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer DICKERHOFF, Defendant-Appellee, and Superintendent Sorrell Saunders; Assistant Superintendent Randy Turner; Sergeant McNeil, Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 274
Pages: 239–239

Head Matter:
Ronnie M. BELK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer DICKERHOFF, Defendant-Appellee, and Superintendent Sorrell Saunders; Assistant Superintendent Randy Turner; Sergeant McNeil, Defendants.
No. 07-7363.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 20, 2008.
Decided: April 17, 2008.
Ronnie M. Belk, Appellant Pro Se. James Philip Allen, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Ronnie M. Belk appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Belk v. Dickerhoff, No. 5:06-ct-03071-H (E.D.N.C. Oct. 19, 2006; Aug. 14, 2007). We grant Belk's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.