Case Name: MIAMI TOWER ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Federal Insurance Company, a/s/o Greer, Homer & Bonner, P.A. n/k/a Homer & Bonner, P.A., Vigilant Insurance Company a/s/o Popham Haik Schnobrich & Kaufman Ltd., and Bankers Insurance Company a/s/o Gerald Kornreich, P.A., Appellants, v. SIMPLEX TIME RECORDER CO. and Tri-City Electric Co., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2001-03-07
Citations: 782 So. 2d 442
Docket Number: Nos. 3D00-1341, 3D00-989 and 3D00-985
Parties: MIAMI TOWER ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Federal Insurance Company, a/s/o Greer, Homer & Bonner, P.A. n/k/a Homer & Bonner, P.A., Vigilant Insurance Company a/s/o Popham Haik Schnobrich & Kaufman Ltd., and Bankers Insurance Company a/s/o Gerald Kornreich, P.A., Appellants, v. SIMPLEX TIME RECORDER CO. and Tri-City Electric Co., Appellees.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GODERICH and FLETCHER, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 782
Pages: 442–443

Head Matter:
MIAMI TOWER ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Federal Insurance Company, a/s/o Greer, Homer & Bonner, P.A. n/k/a Homer & Bonner, P.A., Vigilant Insurance Company a/s/o Popham Haik Schnobrich & Kaufman Ltd., and Bankers Insurance Company a/s/o Gerald Kornreich, P.A., Appellants, v. SIMPLEX TIME RECORDER CO. and Tri-City Electric Co., Appellees.
Nos. 3D00-1341, 3D00-989 and 3D00-985.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 7, 2001.
Rehearing Denied May 2, 2001.
Sheehe & Vendittelli; Cozen & O Con-nor and Michael A. McKenzie (Atlanta, GA); Kramer, Green, Zuckerman, Kahn & Greene and Robert I. Buchsbaum (Hollywood), for appellants.
George, Hartz, Lundeen and Fulmer and Mitchell L. Lundeen; William L. Pet-ros; Morgan, Lewis & Bockius and Joseph Brooks (Washington, D.C.), for appellees.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GODERICH and FLETCHER, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Miami Tower Associates Limited Partnership and others appeal summary judgments entered against them and in favor of Simplex Time Recorder Co. and Tri-City Electric Co. We conclude that genuine issues of material fact preclude disposition of this matter by way of summary judgment. See Moore v. Morris, 475 So.2d 666, 668 (Fla.1985); Roll v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40, 43 (Fla.1966). Thus, we reverse the summary judgments and remand for further proceedings.