Case Name: The BLACKFEET TRIBE OF the BLACKFEET INDIAN RESERVATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Janet JESSUP, Administrator of the Gaming Control Division; Marc Racicot, Governor of the State of Montana; Andy Poole, Deputy Director of the Department of Commerce; Judy Browning, Chief of Staff for Policy and Legal Affairs; and the State of Montana, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1996-06-07
Citations: 85 F.3d 465
Docket Number: No. 94-35079
Parties: The BLACKFEET TRIBE OF the BLACKFEET INDIAN RESERVATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Janet JESSUP, Administrator of the Gaming Control Division; Marc Racicot, Governor of the State of Montana; Andy Poole, Deputy Director of the Department of Commerce; Judy Browning, Chief of Staff for Policy and Legal Affairs; and the State of Montana, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: BEEZER and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges, and ORRICK, Senior District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 85
Pages: 465–465

Head Matter:
The BLACKFEET TRIBE OF the BLACKFEET INDIAN RESERVATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Janet JESSUP, Administrator of the Gaming Control Division; Marc Racicot, Governor of the State of Montana; Andy Poole, Deputy Director of the Department of Commerce; Judy Browning, Chief of Staff for Policy and Legal Affairs; and the State of Montana, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 94-35079.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
June 7, 1996.
N. Jean Bearcrane, Blackfeet Legal Department, Browning, Montana, and Jeanne S. Whiteing, Whiteing & Thompson, Boulder, Colorado, for plaintiff-appellant.
Joseph P. Mazurek, Attorney General, and Deanne L. Sandholm, Assistant Attorney General, Helena, Montana, for defendantsappellees.
Before: BEEZER and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges, and ORRICK, Senior District Judge.
The Honorable William H. Orrick, Senior United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
The judgment of this court, 39 F.3d 1186 (Table), is vacated. For the reasons stated by the Supreme Court in Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 1114, 134 L.Ed.2d 252 (1996), we affirm the judgment of the district court.
AFFIRMED.