Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Janice Marie CARTER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-09-11
Citations: 478 F. App'x 16
Docket Number: No. 12-6770
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Janice Marie CARTER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 478
Pages: 16–16

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Janice Marie CARTER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-6770.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 6, 2012.
Decided: Sept. 11, 2012.
Janice Marie Carter, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Andrew Bassford, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Janice Marie Carter appeals the district court's order denying her 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence reduction based on Amendment 750 to the Sentencing Guidelines, as well as its order denying her motion for reconsideration. Our review of the record demonstrates that Amendment 750 did not alter Carter's Guidelines range. See United States v. Munn, 595 F.3d 183, 187 (4th Cir.2010). We also conclude that the district court correctly determined that it lacked authority to entertain Carter's motion for reconsideration. See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir.2010). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's orders. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.