Case Name: Emmett STROMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-03-20
Citations: 670 So. 2d 159
Docket Number: No. 95-1904
Parties: Emmett STROMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: BOOTH, WOLF and BENTON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 670
Pages: 159–159

Head Matter:
Emmett STROMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 95-1904.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
March 20, 1996.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, and Emmett Stromas, pro se, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and James W. Rogers, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this direct criminal appeal, the Public Defender has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the record satisfies us that no good faith argument can be made that reversible error occurred in the trial court. Accordingly, we affirm the revocation of appellant's probation and the sentence imposed. However, we note that apparently no written order was entered revoking probation. On remand, the trial court is directed to enter a written order consistent with its oral pronouncement revoking appellant's probation.
BOOTH, WOLF and BENTON, JJ., concur.