Case Name: William F. HAYES, Jr., et al., Appellants, v. In re the GUARDIANSHIP OF Mae E. THOMPSON, etc., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2005-03-16
Citations: 934 So. 2d 493
Docket Number: No. 3D04-985
Parties: William F. HAYES, Jr., et al., Appellants, v. In re the GUARDIANSHIP OF Mae E. THOMPSON, etc., Appellee.
Judges: Before LEVY, SHEPHERD, and CORTINAS, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 934
Pages: 493–493

Head Matter:
William F. HAYES, Jr., et al., Appellants, v. In re the GUARDIANSHIP OF Mae E. THOMPSON, etc., Appellee.
No. 3D04-985.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 16, 2005.
Rosenthal Rosenthal 'Rasco, Eduardo I. Rasco, and Jessica B. Lassman, for appellants.
Stephen B. Fuller, for appellee.
Before LEVY, SHEPHERD, and CORTINAS, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We find that the appellants lack standing to challenge the trial court's award of attorney's fees. McGinnis v. Kanevsky, 564 So.2d 1141, 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). Accordingly, we affirm and certify conflict with Bachinger v. Sunbank/South Florida, N.A., 675 So.2d 186 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
Affirmed; conflict certified.