Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rolando PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-06-14
Citations: 234 F. App'x 629
Docket Number: No. 06-30583
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rolando PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 234
Pages: 629–630

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rolando PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-30583.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 5, 2007 .
Filed June 14, 2007.
Lori Harper Suek, Esq., USBI—Office of the U.S. Attorney, Billings, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Kelly J. Varnes, Esq., Hendrickson Everson Noennig & Woodward, PC, Billings, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: LEAVY, RYMER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Rolando Perez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 824-month sentence for violation of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951, and carrying or using a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)-(2). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, United States v. Kelly, 422 F.3d 889, 891-92 (9th Cir. 2005), and we vacate and remand.
Perez challenges the district court's determination that he was a career offender for sentencing purposes. See U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1. The Government has conceded error in this regard, because one of the predicate offenses was too old to be counted. See U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2(e). We agree that the sentence should be vacated and remanded for proceedings consistent with this disposition.
VACATED and REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.