Case Name: UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Specialist Four Orlando WITHERSPOON, [ XXX-XX-XXXX ], United States Army, Appellant
Court: United States Army Court of Military Review
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1985-02-28
Citations: 19 M.J. 978
Docket Number: CM 444824
Parties: UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Specialist Four Orlando WITHERSPOON, [ XXX-XX-XXXX ], United States Army, Appellant.
Judges: Before WOLD, NAUGHTON and COHEN, Appellate Military Judges.
Reporter: West's Military Justice Reporter
Volume: 19
Pages: 978–978

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Specialist Four Orlando WITHERSPOON, [ XXX-XX-XXXX ], United States Army, Appellant.
CM 444824.
U.S. Army Court of Military Review.
28 Feb. 1985.
Lieutenant Colonel Paul J. Luedtke, JAGC, Captain Rita R. Carroll, JAGC, and First Lieutenant Peter D.P. Vint, JAGC, were on the pleadings for appellant.
Colonel James Kucera, JAGC, Lieutenant Colonel John T. Edwards, JAGC, Captain Thomas E. Booth, JAGC, and Captain Frederick A. Johnson, JAGC, were on the pleadings for appellee.
Before WOLD, NAUGHTON and COHEN, Appellate Military Judges.
. Judge Robert E. Cohen took final action on this case prior to his retirement from active service.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
NAUGHTON, Judge:
Appellant contends that he was prejudiced by the sentence limitation terms of the pretrial agreement which were operative only if a punitive discharge was adjudged. In light of United States v. Castleberry, 18 M.J. 826 (ACMR 1984), and United States v. Holmes, 17 M.J. 830 (ACMR), pet. denied, 18 M.J. 438 (CMA 1984), we find this contention to be without merit. Such provisions are not violative of public policy.
The findings of guilty and the sentence are affirmed.
COHEN, J., concurs.