Case Name: Charles MAHER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMEREN UE, f/k/a Union Electric Company, and Director of Revenue, State of Missouri, Defendants-Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-01-22
Citations: 66 S.W.3d 173
Docket Number: No. ED 80007
Parties: Charles MAHER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMEREN UE, f/k/a Union Electric Company, and Director of Revenue, State of Missouri, Defendants-Respondents.
Judges: Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 66
Pages: 173–174

Head Matter:
Charles MAHER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMEREN UE, f/k/a Union Electric Company, and Director of Revenue, State of Missouri, Defendants-Respondents.
No. ED 80007.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Jan. 22, 2002.
Lawrence O. Willbrand, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Michael P. Steeno, St. Louis, MO, for respondent Ameren UE.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Keith D. Halcomb, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent Mo. Dir. of Revenue.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The driver, Charles Maher, appeals the trial court's judgment dismissing his claim against Ameren UE and granting sum mary judgment in favor the Director of Revenue. No error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(5).