Case Name: Dorothy M. Pacyna, Respondent, v. Clement J. Pacyna, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1988-10-27
Citations: 72 N.Y.2d 1039
Docket Number: 
Parties: Dorothy M. Pacyna, Respondent, v Clement J. Pacyna, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 72
Pages: 1039–1039

Head Matter:
Dorothy M. Pacyna, Respondent, v Clement J. Pacyna, Appellant.
Submitted August 22, 1988;
decided October 27, 1988

Opinion:
Upon appellant's motion, appeal transferred, without costs, to the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, upon the ground that a direct appeal does not lie when questions other than the constitutional validity of a statutory provision are involved (NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b] [2]; § 5 [b]; CPLR 5601 [b] [2]).