Case Name: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. FRANKLIN ROOSEVELT HAROLD
Court: North Carolina Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 1972-03-29
Citations: 14 N.C. App. 172
Docket Number: No. 7212SC149
Parties: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. FRANKLIN ROOSEVELT HAROLD
Judges: Judges Britt and Graham concur.
Reporter: North Carolina Court of Appeals Reports
Volume: 14
Pages: 172–173

Head Matter:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. FRANKLIN ROOSEVELT HAROLD
No. 7212SC149
(Filed 29 March 1972)
1. Criminal Law §§ 18, 157— appeal from superior court — failure to show disposition in district court
Appeal from conviction in the superior court of driving while license was suspended is dismissed where the record does not show the disposition of thej case in the district court and how the case reached the superior court.
2. Criminal Law § 162— necessity for objection
The admission of incompetent evidence is not ground for a new trial where there was no objection at the time the evidence was offered.
Appeal by defendant from judgment of Bailey, Judge, 20 September 1971 Session, Cumberland Superior Court.
Attorney General Robert Morgan by Assistant Attorneys General William W. Melvin and William B. Ray for the State.
Anderson, NimocJcs & Broadfoot by Henry L. Anderson, Jr., for defendant appellant.

Opinion:
CAMPBELL, Judge.
The record discloses that a warrant was issued in the District Court of Cumberland County charging the defendant with the unlawful operation of a motor vehicle upon the public highways of the State on 12 June 1971, while his operator's license was in a state of suspension; this being a second offense of this type as he had been convicted previously of a similar offense on 2 June, 1971.
The disposition of this case in the District Court is not shown by the record, and it does not appear how this case reached the Superior Court from which court this purported appeal was taken.
In the absence of any showing that the case was properly docketed in the Superior Court and therefore properly appealed to this Court, the appeal is dismissed.
Nevertheless, we have examined the purported appeal and assignments of error and find them without merit. For the most part all errors are assigned to the admission of evidence. There were no objections made to such evidence and in the absence of an objection at the time the evidence was offered a new trial will not be awarded even though the evidence be incompetent. State v. Ball, 277 N.C. 714, 178 S.E. 2d 377 (1970).
The record reveals that the defendant, if properly in the Superior Court, had a fair trial, free of any prejudicial error.
Appeal dismissed.
Judges Britt and Graham concur.