Case Name: Joseph M. MELENDEZ, II, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Deputy WILLIAMS, Hampton Sheriff's Department; Hampton Roads Regional Jail, Prison Health Services, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-02-26
Citations: 88 F. App'x 634
Docket Number: No. 03-7959
Parties: Joseph M. MELENDEZ, II, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Deputy WILLIAMS, Hampton Sheriff’s Department; Hampton Roads Regional Jail, Prison Health Services, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 88
Pages: 634–634

Head Matter:
Joseph M. MELENDEZ, II, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Deputy WILLIAMS, Hampton Sheriff’s Department; Hampton Roads Regional Jail, Prison Health Services, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 03-7959.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 19, 2004.
Decided Feb. 26, 2004.
Joseph M. Melendez, II, Appellant pro se.
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Joseph M. Melendez, II, appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The district court properly required exhaustion of administrative remedies under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) (2000). Because Melendez did not demonstrate to the district court that he had exhausted administrative remedies or that such remedies were not available, the court's dismissal of the action, without prejudice, was not an abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED