Case Name: Robert WOOTEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of CALIFORNIA; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-09-15
Citations: 292 F. App'x 710
Docket Number: No. 08-16417
Parties: Robert WOOTEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of CALIFORNIA; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 292
Pages: 710–710

Head Matter:
Robert WOOTEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of CALIFORNIA; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 08-16417.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 8, 2008.
Filed Sept. 15, 2008.
Robert Wooten, Stockton, CA, pro se.
Before: PREGERSON, McKEOWN and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Upon review of the record and appellant's response to this court's order to show cause, this court hereby summarily affirms the district court's order denying appellant's motion for preliminary injunctive relief and the district court's order denying appellant's motion for reconsideration. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (summary affirmance appropriate where result is clear from face of record); Harris v. Board of Supervisors, LA. County, 366 F.3d 754, 760 (9th Cir.2004) (denial of preliminary injunction reviewed for abuse of discretion).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.