Case Name: Michael MAGULA and Steve Magula, Appellants, v. Robert L. GOSSETT and Gossett, McDonald, Gossett & Crawford, P.A., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-10-31
Citations: 568 So. 2d 1011
Docket Number: No. 89-1546
Parties: Michael MAGULA and Steve Magula, Appellants, v. Robert L. GOSSETT and Gossett, McDonald, Gossett & Crawford, P.A., Appellees.
Judges: DELL, WALDEN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 568
Pages: 1011–1011

Head Matter:
Michael MAGULA and Steve Magula, Appellants, v. Robert L. GOSSETT and Gossett, McDonald, Gossett & Crawford, P.A., Appellees.
No. 89-1546.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Oct. 31, 1990.
Steve Maguía, Fort Lauderdale, pro se.
Ronald P. Gossett of Gossett, McDonald, Gossett & Crawford, P.A., Hollywood, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiffs appeal a judgment on the pleadings entered in favor of defendants in a legal malpractice action. We reverse.
After reviewing the complaint and answer, we are of the opinion that, inarticulate though it may be in some places, the complaint did state a cause of action and factual questions remain. Therefore, judgment on the pleadings was inappropriate in this instance. McAbee v. Edwards, 340 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976); See also General GMC Truck Sales And Serv. v. Simm, 430 So.2d 998 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Riccio v. Stein, 559 So.2d 1207 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) rev dismissed, 567 So.2d 436 (Fla.1990).
REVERSED.
DELL, WALDEN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.