Case Name: WALTER HAWKINS, NORA A. HAWKINS, D. C. ARRINGTON, ROSETTA ARRINGTON, DOLLIA ARRINGTON, STELLA ARRINGTON and SABINA PERKINS, v. THE FEDERAL LAND BANK OF COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 1943-09-29
Citations: 223 N.C. 858
Docket Number: 
Parties: WALTER HAWKINS, NORA A. HAWKINS, D. C. ARRINGTON, ROSETTA ARRINGTON, DOLLIA ARRINGTON, STELLA ARRINGTON and SABINA PERKINS, v. THE FEDERAL LAND BANK OF COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA.
Judges: 
Reporter: North Carolina Reports
Volume: 223
Pages: 858–858

Head Matter:
WALTER HAWKINS, NORA A. HAWKINS, D. C. ARRINGTON, ROSETTA ARRINGTON, DOLLIA ARRINGTON, STELLA ARRINGTON and SABINA PERKINS, v. THE FEDERAL LAND BANK OF COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA.
(Filed 29 September, 1943.)
Appeal by plaintiffs from Frizzelle, J., at November-December Term, 1942, of Halifax. No error.
Civil action to vacate foreclosure deed.
Appropriate issues were submitted to the jury and answered in favor of the defendant. From judgment thereon plaintiffs appealed.
Keel & Keel for plaintiffs, appellants.
Wade H. Dickens for defendant, appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This case was here on a former appeal. See Hawkins v. Land Bank, 221 N. C., 73, 18 S. E. (2d), 823, where the essential facts are stated. This appeal should have been docketed at the Spring Term. Rule 5, 221 N. C., 546. Be that as it may, the jury has decided the controverted facts in favor of the defendant. The exceptive assignments of error relied upon by the plaintiffs are without substantial merit. The judgment entered must be sustained.
No error.