Case Name: James E. SKIDMORE, Petitioner, v. FIRST BANK OF MINNEAPOLIS, Personal Representative of the Estate of Merrill J. Anderson; First Bank of Minneapolis, Personal Representative of the Estate of Donna D. Anderson; Wallace L. Hall a/k/a Wallace Hall; Gerald W. Feil and Sally S. Feil; George W. Callan and Mary Ann Callan; Communities Foundation of Texas; Hall Associates, Ltd.; La Plata Abstract Company, Trustee, Colorado Corporation; and the Public Trustee of the County of Archuleta, State of Colorado, and all Unknown Persons who Claim any Interest in the Subject Matter of this Action, Respondents
Court: Colorado Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Colorado
Decision Date: 1990-05-02
Citations: 790 P.2d 843
Docket Number: No. 89SC3
Parties: James E. SKIDMORE, Petitioner, v. FIRST BANK OF MINNEAPOLIS, Personal Representative of the Estate of Merrill J. Anderson; First Bank of Minneapolis, Personal Representative of the Estate of Donna D. Anderson; Wallace L. Hall a/k/a Wallace Hall; Gerald W. Feil and Sally S. Feil; George W. Callan and Mary Ann Callan; Communities Foundation of Texas; Hall Associates, Ltd.; La Plata Ab stract Company, Trustee, Colorado Corporation; and the Public Trustee of the County of Archuleta, State of Colorado, and all Unknown Persons who Claim any Interest in the Subject Matter of this Action, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Pacific Reporter 2d
Volume: 790
Pages: 843–844

Head Matter:
James E. SKIDMORE, Petitioner, v. FIRST BANK OF MINNEAPOLIS, Personal Representative of the Estate of Merrill J. Anderson; First Bank of Minneapolis, Personal Representative of the Estate of Donna D. Anderson; Wallace L. Hall a/k/a Wallace Hall; Gerald W. Feil and Sally S. Feil; George W. Callan and Mary Ann Callan; Communities Foundation of Texas; Hall Associates, Ltd.; La Plata Ab stract Company, Trustee, Colorado Corporation; and the Public Trustee of the County of Archuleta, State of Colorado, and all Unknown Persons who Claim any Interest in the Subject Matter of this Action, Respondents.
No. 89SC3.
Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.
May 2, 1990.

Opinion:
ORDER OP COURT
Upon consideration of the Record on Appeal, together with the Written and Oral Arguments of counsel, and being sufficiently advised in the premises,
IT IS ORDERED that the Writ of Certio-rari is DENIED as having been improvidently granted.