Case Name: Kendal COLOSIMO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-10-20
Citations: 775 So. 2d 352
Docket Number: No. 2D00-3399
Parties: Kendal COLOSIMO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and STRINGER, JJ„ Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 775
Pages: 352–352

Head Matter:
Kendal COLOSIMO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D00-3399.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Oct. 20, 2000.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Kendal Colosimo appeals the summary denial of her "motion to credit time served in court ordered drug rehabilitation program" filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm because Colosimo's motion is facially insufficient under State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla.1998), and Baker v. State, 714 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). These cases hold that credit time issues are cognizable in a rule 3.800(a) motion when it is affirmatively alleged how and where the court records demonstrate on their face an entitlement to relief. Our affirmance is without prejudice to Colosimo filing a motion under rule 3.800(a) which meets the requirements of Mancino and Baker, or to filing a timely and legally sufficient motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.
CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and STRINGER, JJ" Concur.