Case Name: Robert Harford, Respondent, v. Charles A. Stoneham and Another, as Partners, Trading under the Firm Name of Charles A. Stoneham & Co., and Individually, Appellants, Impleaded with Others, Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1928-04
Citations: 223 A.D. 820
Docket Number: 
Parties: Robert Harford, Respondent, v. Charles A. Stoneham and Another, as Partners, Trading under the Firm Name of Charles A. Stoneham & Co., and Individually, Appellants, Impleaded with Others, Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 223
Pages: 820–820

Head Matter:
First Department,
April, 1928.
Robert Harford, Respondent, v. Charles A. Stoneham and Another, as Partners, Trading under the Firm Name of Charles A. Stoneham & Co., and Individually, Appellants, Impleaded with Others, Defendants.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment and order are affirmed, with costs. While there are undoubtedly errors in the record, they are not sufficiently substantial to affect the result and, .therefore, must be disregarded under Civil Practice Act, section 106, especially when considered in connection with the whole record, which shows so clearly a bold and deliberate conspiracy fraudulently to convert on a large scale. A new trial would, in our opinion, reach the same result. Present — Dowling, P. J., Merrell, Finch, McAvoy and Proskauer, JJ. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.