Case Name: Patricia AUSTIN, Plaintiff, Dennis McLain, as personal representative of the Estate of Anthony Gilhouse Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECURECARE, INCORPORATED; Kathy Hebert-Laginess, R.N.; Anne Latulip-Gariepy; Daryl Tyrone Parker, M.D.; James Garrett, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-12-22
Citations: 304 F. App'x 396
Docket Number: No. 07-1600
Parties: Patricia AUSTIN, Plaintiff, Dennis McLain, as personal representative of the Estate of Anthony Gilhouse Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECURECARE, INCORPORATED; Kathy Hebert-Laginess, R.N.; Anne Latulip-Gariepy; Daryl Tyrone Parker, M.D.; James Garrett, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 304
Pages: 396–397

Head Matter:
Patricia AUSTIN, Plaintiff, Dennis McLain, as personal representative of the Estate of Anthony Gilhouse Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECURECARE, INCORPORATED; Kathy Hebert-Laginess, R.N.; Anne Latulip-Gariepy; Daryl Tyrone Parker, M.D.; James Garrett, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 07-1600.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Dec. 22, 2008.
BEFORE: DAUGHTREY, ROGERS, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI, Judge.
The Hon. Jane A. Restani, Chief Judge of the United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
ROGERS, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Dennis McLain, on behalf of the Estate of Anthony Gilhouse, appeals the district court's grant of summary judg ment in favor of defendants SecureCare, Inc., Daryl Tyrone Parker, M.D., James Garrett, R.N., Anne Latulip-Gariepy, L.P.N., and Kathy Hebert-Laginess, R.N. Plaintiff brought this suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging violations of Gil-house's Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment rights. Plaintiff claims that defendants' deliberate indifference to Gilhouse's serious medical needs resulted in Gil-house's death from an asthma attack. After reviewing the record, the parties' briefs, and the applicable law, and hearing oral argument, this court determines that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a panel opinion and affirms the district court's decision for the reasons stated in Judge Edmunds' April 24, 2007, 2007 WL 1219048, opinion and order. The district court properly granted summary judgment in favor of all remaining defendants. The judgment of the district court is therefore affirmed.