Case Name: Robert TERRY, Jr., Mabel Fawsett, Terry Howard, Ronald Rohm, Kathryn Godwin, Steve Hoskins, Jan Lein, Jane Brooks, Astor Summerlin, Peggy Berg, Greg Rosslow, Debra Jones, Chris Haynes, Betty Lou Wells, Nel Grantz, James Grimes, William Thiess, Virginia Meeko, and Paul Sinnot, Appellants, v. ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the state of Florida; St. Lucie County Port and Airport Authority; and Dorothy Jo Conrad, as Tax Collector of St. Lucie County, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-06-24
Citations: 599 So. 2d 1054
Docket Number: No. 91-1954
Parties: Robert TERRY, Jr., Mabel Fawsett, Terry Howard, Ronald Rohm, Kathryn Godwin, Steve Hoskins, Jan Lein, Jane Brooks, Astor Summerlin, Peggy Berg, Greg Rosslow, Debra Jones, Chris Haynes, Betty Lou Wells, Nel Grantz, James Grimes, William Thiess, Virginia Meeko, and Paul Sinnot, Appellants, v. ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the state of Florida; St. Lucie County Port and Airport Authority; and Dorothy Jo Conrad, as Tax Collector of St. Lucie County, Appellees.
Judges: ANSTEAD, WARNER and FARMER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 599
Pages: 1054–1055

Head Matter:
Robert TERRY, Jr., Mabel Fawsett, Terry Howard, Ronald Rohm, Kathryn Godwin, Steve Hoskins, Jan Lein, Jane Brooks, Astor Summerlin, Peggy Berg, Greg Rosslow, Debra Jones, Chris Haynes, Betty Lou Wells, Nel Grantz, James Grimes, William Thiess, Virginia Meeko, and Paul Sinnot, Appellants, v. ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the state of Florida; St. Lucie County Port and Airport Authority; and Dorothy Jo Conrad, as Tax Collector of St. Lucie County, Appellees.
No. 91-1954.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
June 24, 1992.
Ben L. Bryan, Jr. of Fee, Bryan & Koble-gard, P.A., Fort Pierce, for appellants.
Daniel S. McIntyre, St. Lucie County Atty., Fort Pierce, and Robert S. Goldman of Messer, Vickers, Caparello, Madsen, Lewis, Goldman & Metz, P.A., for appel-lees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court's determination that appellants lacked standing to challenge a levy of taxes by appellee. See Fredericks v. Blake, 382 So.2d 368 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).
ANSTEAD, WARNER and FARMER, JJ., concur.
. Although by our affirmance of the standing issue it is not necessary to reach the merits of this litigation, we would note that appellants' claim that the taxing provisions of chapter 88-515, Laws of Florida, prevail over TRIM (Truth in Millage) legislation, their argument has been effectively mooted by the 1992 amendment to section 200.065(13). From that legislative amendment, it is clear that TRIM controls.