Case Name: George H. Meyers et al. Appellants, v. Lena Stix el al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Common Pleas
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1894-05
Citations: 8 Misc. 680
Docket Number: 
Parties: George H. Meyers et al. Appellants, v. Lena Stix el al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 8
Pages: 680–681

Head Matter:
George H. Meyers et al. Appellants, v. Lena Stix el al., Respondents.
Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the City Court, affirming a judgment of the trial term of that court, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Charles Meyers, for appellants.
Samuel W. Weiss, for respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We see little or no difference between the facts as presented on the former trial (reported 36 N. Y. St. Repr. 848) and upon this. On the former appeal we held that there was a trilateral agreement between the parties, and we see no reason to recede from that upon the facts presented in this. We think, therefore, this judgment is proper and should be affirmed, with costs.
Present: Bookstaver, Bischoff and Pryor, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.