Case Name: F. S. DONAHUE, SANTO & CO., F. STEVEN DONAHUE, ANDREW RISSO, GREGORY A. YACULLO AND RAYMOND G. SEAKEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENTS, v. GEORGE F. KUGLER, JR., ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, JOSEPH F. KRUPSKY, CHIEF OF THE NEW JERSEY BUREAU OF SECURITIES, THE NEW JERSEY BUREAU OF SECURITIES, AND STEPHEN G. WEISS, SPECIAL CHIEF OF THE NEW JERSEY BUREAU OF SECURITIES, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1972-09-26
Citations: 63 N.J. 572
Docket Number: 
Parties: F. S. DONAHUE, SANTO & CO., F. STEVEN DONAHUE, ANDREW RISSO, GREGORY A. YACULLO AND RAYMOND G. SEAKEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENTS, v. GEORGE F. KUGLER, JR., ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, JOSEPH F. KRUPSKY, CHIEF OF THE NEW JERSEY BUREAU OF SECURITIES, THE NEW JERSEY BUREAU OF SECURITIES, AND STEPHEN G. WEISS, SPECIAL CHIEF OF THE NEW JERSEY BUREAU OF SECURITIES, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 63
Pages: 572–572

Head Matter:
F. S. DONAHUE, SANTO & CO., F. STEVEN DONAHUE, ANDREW RISSO, GREGORY A. YACULLO AND RAYMOND G. SEAKEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENTS, v. GEORGE F. KUGLER, JR., ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, JOSEPH F. KRUPSKY, CHIEF OF THE NEW JERSEY BUREAU OF SECURITIES, THE NEW JERSEY BUREAU OF SECURITIES, AND STEPHEN G. WEISS, SPECIAL CHIEF OF THE NEW JERSEY BUREAU OF SECURITIES, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Argued September 26, 1972
Decided September 26, 1972.
Mr. Stephen Skillman, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for defendants-appellants (Mr. George F. Kugler, Jr., Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Mr. Stephen Skillman, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Mr. Charles B. Parker, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).
Mr. Donald A. Robinson, argued the cause ;for plaintiffsrespondents (Messrs. Robinson, Wayne & Greenberg, attorneys; Messrs. Donald A. Robinson and Nicholas L. Ribis, on the brief).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
A petition for certification having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same,
It is hereupon Ordered that the petition for certification is granted (62 N. J. 80), the decision of the Appellate Division is reversed and the matter is to proceed promptly before the designated hearing officer.
For reversal — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Proctor, Hall and Mountain and Judge Sullivan — 6.
Opposed — None.