Case Name: Clemente Rosas OCAMPO; et al., Petitioners, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-09-04
Citations: 291 F. App'x 826
Docket Number: No. 07-72827
Parties: Clemente Rosas OCAMPO; et al., Petitioners, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 291
Pages: 826–826

Head Matter:
Clemente Rosas OCAMPO; et al., Petitioners, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 07-72827.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 26, 2008.
Filed Sept. 4, 2008.
Clemente Rosas Ocampo, Anaheim, CA, pro se.
Juana Rosas Castro, Anaheim, CA, pro se.
Mirta Yesenia Rosas Castro, Anaheim, CA, pro se.
Edward C. Durant, Oil, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, CAC-District Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
Before: SCHROEDER, KLEINFELD, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Clemente Rosas Ocampo and his wife and their minor child, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order denying them motion to reopen removal proceedings.
Petitioners have waived any challenge to the BIA's order denying their motion to reopen by failing to raise any arguments related to the BIA's dispositive determination that the motion to reopen was untimely. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256,1259-60 (9th Cir.1996).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.