Case Name: Grow v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railway Company, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1902-06-04
Citations: 203 Pa. 249
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 106
Parties: Grow v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railway Company, Appellant.
Judges: Before McCollum, C. J., Mitchell, Brown, Mestrezat and Potter, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 203
Pages: 249–249

Head Matter:
Grow v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railway Company, Appellant.
Argued May 7, 1902.
Appeal, No. 106, Jan. T., 1902, by-defendant, from order of C. P. McKean Co., June T., 1901, No. 318, refusing a change of venue in case of G. N. Grow v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railway Company.
Before McCollum, C. J., Mitchell, Brown, Mestrezat and Potter, JJ.
Reversed.
June 4, 1902:

Opinion:
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Mestrezat,
The reasons assigned in the application for a change of venue in this case are the same as those in Willoughby et al. v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railroad Company, in which an opinion has this day been filed. The same learned judge heard both applications and refused them for the same reasons. We are, therefore, compelled to reverse the order of the court below, and remand the case for a rehearing of the application in accordance with the views expressed in the opinion filed in the Willoughby case.
Order reversed with a procedendo.