Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edwin Lloyd MURRAY, a/k/a Gator, Plaintiff-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-03-05
Citations: 558 F. App'x 331
Docket Number: No. 13-7778
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edwin Lloyd MURRAY, a/k/a Gator, Plaintiff-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 558
Pages: 331–332

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edwin Lloyd MURRAY, a/k/a Gator, Plaintiff-Appellant.
No. 13-7778.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 27, 2014.
Decided: March 5, 2014.
Edwin Lloyd Murray, Appellant Pro Se. Martin Joseph Clarke, Barbara Slaymaker Sale, Assistant United States Attorneys, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Edwin Lloyd Murray appeals the district court's order granting his motion for a sentence reduction filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion. See United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir.2004) (motion under § 3582(c) "is subject to the discretion of the district court"). Thus, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Affirmed.