Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. ROBERT KEITH DAVID, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1990-08-01
Citations: 102 Or. App. 685
Docket Number: P090361; CA A61956
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. ROBERT KEITH DAVID, Appellant.
Judges: Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Newman and Deits, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 102
Pages: 685–686

Head Matter:
Submitted on record and briefs June 22,
reversed and remanded for a new trial August 1, 1990
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. ROBERT KEITH DAVID, Appellant.
(P090361; CA A61956)
795 P2d 121
Julie A. Leonhardt, Sandy, filed the brief for appellant.
Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Ann Kelley, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Newman and Deits, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants. The trial was to the court without a jury, and defendant elected to represent himself. On appeal, he contends that he was not properly advised of the consequences of proceeding pro se and, therefore, that his waiver of counsel was not valid. The state concedes that defendant is correct, and we agree. State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. Cheney, 96 Or App 680, 773 P2d 1351 (1989); State v. Boswell, 92 Or App 652, 760 P2d 276 (1988).
Reversed and remanded for a new trial.