Case Name: Demetrius HULSEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2017-10-31
Citations: 532 S.W.3d 743
Docket Number: No. ED 105051
Parties: Demetrius HULSEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Lisa P. Page, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 532
Pages: 743–743

Head Matter:
Demetrius HULSEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 105051
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
FILED: October 31, 2017
FOR APPELLANT: Joshua D. Hawley, Robert J. (JEFF) Bartholomew, P.O. Box 899, St. Louis, MO 65102.
For Respondent: Jedd C. Schneider, Woodrail Centre, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, Missouri 65203.
Before Lisa P. Page, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Demetrius Hulsey ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief, without an evidentiary hearing. Movant was convicted, following a jury trial, of two counts of robbery in the first degree. Movant was sentenced as a prior offender to 20 years' imprisonment for each count, which were ordered to be served concurrently. This court affirmed Movant's convictions and sentences in State v. Hulsey, 424 S.W.3d 464 (Mo. App. E.D. 2014). We affirm the motion court's judgment.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).