Case Name: Craig BUCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The BOEING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-01-24
Citations: 2 F. App'x 807
Docket Number: No. 99-36067
Parties: Craig BUCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The BOEING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 2
Pages: 807–808

Head Matter:
Craig BUCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The BOEING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 99-36067.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 8, 2001 .
Decided Jan. 24, 2001.
Before BEEZER, O’SCANNLAIN, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.
. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument and denies Buck’s request for oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Craig Buck appeals pro se the summary judgment of the district court dismissing his action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we review de novo, see Olson v. Morris, 188 F.3d 1083, 1085 (9th Cir.1999). We affirm for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated September 1, 1999 which was adopted by Judge Zilly.
We have not considered Buck's reply brief or attachments thereto as they contain information not previously part of the record. See Tonry v. Security Experts, Inc., 20 F.3d 967, 974 (9th Cir.1994). We have considered Buck's remaining contentions, including those of judicial bias, and deny them for lack of merit.
AFFIRMED.
. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.