Case Name: SEIBERT, Recr v. HERRING
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1929-06-05
Citations: 7 Ohio Law Abs. 367
Docket Number: No 21536
Parties: SEIBERT, Recr v HERRING
Judges: Marshall, CJ, Kinkade, Matthias and, Day, JJ, concur. Robinson and' Jones, JJ, concur in the syllabus, but dissent from the judgment.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 7
Pages: 367–367

Head Matter:
SEIBERT, Recr v HERRING
Ohio Supreme Court
No 21536.
Decided June 5, 1929

Opinion:
Syllabus by
ALLEN, J
PLEADINGS — Trial (590 E3h)
(440 D) The admission arising from a demurrer is not to be regarded as evidence or considered as equivalent to evidence. It merely denies the legal sufficiency of the facts alleged, and hence such facts áre admitted solely for the purpose of testing their sufficiency in law.
Marshall, CJ, Kinkade, Matthias and, Day, JJ, concur. Robinson and' Jones, JJ, concur in the syllabus, but dissent from the judgment.