Case Name: David J. GONZALEZ and Marcia Gonzalez, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. TENET HEALTH SYSTEM DI, INC., Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-02-15
Citations: 162 S.W.3d 97
Docket Number: No. ED 83888
Parties: David J. GONZALEZ and Marcia Gonzalez, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. TENET HEALTH SYSTEM DI, INC., Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J. and LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 162
Pages: 97–97

Head Matter:
David J. GONZALEZ and Marcia Gonzalez, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. TENET HEALTH SYSTEM DI, INC., Defendant/Respondent.
No. ED 83888.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Feb. 15, 2005.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 5, 2005.
Application for Transfer Denied May 31, 2005.
Rex Carr, East St. Louis, IL, for Appellant.
Greensfelder, Hemker & Gale, P.C., Kevin F. O’Malley, Mary L. Reitz, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.
Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J. and LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
David J. Gonzalez and Marcia Gonzalez appeal from the trial court's judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of Tenet Health System DI, Inc., in their medical malpractice action. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. The evidence in support of the jury verdict is not insufficient. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).