Case Name: Anna Bahnsen and A. A. Elby, Appellees, v. Thomas J. Qualley, Sheriff and The McCormick Harvesting Machine Company, Appellants
Court: Iowa Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Iowa
Decision Date: 1909-04-10
Citations: 142 Iowa 282
Docket Number: 
Parties: Anna Bahnsen and A. A. Elby, Appellees, v. Thomas J. Qualley, Sheriff and The McCormick Harvesting Machine Company, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Iowa Reports
Volume: 142
Pages: 282–284

Head Matter:
Anna Bahnsen and A. A. Elby, Appellees, v. Thomas J. Qualley, Sheriff and The McCormick Harvesting Machine Company, Appellants.
Executions: action to enjoin sale: interest of debtor: evidence. Where the title to property levied upon is in the name of one not the judgment debtor, the burden is upon the judgment creditor to show that hé has some interest therein. In the instant case the evidence is held insufficient to show that the debtor had any interest in the property levied upon.
Appeal from Winneshiek District Court, — Hon. L. E. Fellows, Judge,
Saturday, April 10, 1909.
Action in equity to enjoin a sheriffs sale of real estate. Decree granting the relief prayed, and defendants appeal.
Affirmed.
E. W. Cutting, for appellants.
H. F. Barthell and E. P. Johnson, for appellees.

Opinion:
Weaver, J.
The McCormick Harvesting Machine Company is a judgment creditor of O. A. Elby. Elby is an unmarried person living with his mother, A. A. Elby, and his widowed sister, Anna Bahnsen. . The home occupied by them is upon property the legal title to which is in the name of A. A. Elby and Anna Bahnsen. On the claim that the name of A. A. Elby in the title deeds to the property was intended and was in fact used therein to describe A. O. Elby, the judgment debtor, and that he is in fact a half owner of said property, the McCormick Harvesting Machine Company caused an execution upon its judgment to issue and be levied thereon. To restrain the sheriff from proceeding with the sale this suit was instituted.
The controversy is of a familiar type, and turns entirely upon the fact whether the conveyance under which appellees claim was made to the mother and daughter, or to the brother and sister. It will profit nothing to set out the testimony. Suffice it to say that it shows the appellee A. A. Elby is a woman of foreign birth, but slightly acquainted with the English language, and that her son, A. O. Elby, has been intrusted to a great extent with the management of her business. It also appears that, he acted with his sister in making the purchase of this property, and assumed to sign the name A. A. Elby to the notes and mortgage executed in closing the deal. This the mother, daughter and son say he was authorized to do, and that the name so written was intended to designate A. A. Elby, the mother, and not A. O. Elby, the son. It may be admitted that there are some circumstances on which a suspicion may be based that the son was in fact the person intended as the grantee; but they are of slight import as against the combined testimony of the only persons who can know the truth, and the further fact tha't every dollar which entered into this purchase is traced without dispute to the mother and daughter. No attempt is made whatever to show that the judgment debtor had any means or property from which he did or could have procured the money for that purpose. The one main fact relied upon is that the son lived with his mother and sister, and to the extent of his ability assisted them in carrying on a small grocery business, in which they were' engaged. It appears, however, that for many years he has been physically maimed, and thereby incapacitated for most kinds of manual labor, and has been given a home and support by his mother and sister in return for such services as he can render them. The property being concbdedly in the name of A. A. Elby and Anna Bahnsen, the burden is upon the harvesting machine company to show that its debtor, A. O. Elby, has some interest therein subject to its execution.
In this it has failed, and the decree of the district court is affirmed.