Case Name: Abdullah AL-KIDD, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-08-03
Citations: 653 F.3d 982
Docket Number: No. 06-36059
Parties: Abdullah AL-KIDD, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: HARRY PREGERSON, CARLOS T. BEA, and MILAN D. SMITH, JR., Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 653
Pages: 982–983

Head Matter:
Abdullah AL-KIDD, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-36059.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Aug. 3, 2011.
Lee P. Gelernt, ACLU-American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, New York, NY, R. Keith Roark, Esquire, Hailey, ID, Cynthia J. Woolley, The Law Offices of Cynthia J. Woolley, PLLC, Ketchum, ID, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Matthew M. Collette, Robert Loeb, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: HARRY PREGERSON, CARLOS T. BEA, and MILAN D. SMITH, JR., Circuit Judges.
. Judge Harry Pregerson was substituted for the late Judge David R. Thompson. See General Order 3.2(g).

Opinion:
ORDER
Pursuant to the Opinion of the Supreme Court in Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, — U.S. —, 131 S.Ct. 2074, 179 L.Ed.2d 1149 (2011), the district court's denial of Defendant Ashcroft's motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) is REVERSED, and the matter is REMANDED for proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court's Opinion.