Case Name: Rubens SOUZA, et al., Appellants, v. NI HOLDINGS, LLC, Appellee.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2018-08-01
Citations: 252 So. 3d 382
Docket Number: No. 3D18-67
Parties: Rubens SOUZA, et al., Appellants,
v.
NI HOLDINGS, LLC, Appellee.
Judges: Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and EMAS and FERNANDEZ, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 252
Pages: 382–383

Head Matter:
Rubens SOUZA, et al., Appellants,
v.
NI HOLDINGS, LLC, Appellee.
No. 3D18-67
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Opinion filed August 1, 2018
Bernhard Law Firm, PLLC, and Andrew J. Bernhard, for appellants.
Waldman Barnett, P.L., and Glen H. Waldman, Michael A. Azre, and Eleanor T. Barnett, for appellee.
Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and EMAS and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Koster v. Sullivan, 160 So.3d 385, 389 (Fla. 2015) (holding that if the return of service is regular on its face, service of process is presumed to be valid, and the party challenging service has the burden of overcoming that presumption by clear and convincing evidence); Robles-Martinez v. Diaz, Reus & Targ, LLP, 88 So.3d 177 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (same).