Case Name: Frank PHILLIPS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-05-11
Citations: 991 S.W.2d 193
Docket Number: No. 74511
Parties: Frank PHILLIPS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before JAMES A. PUDLOWSKI, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, Jr., and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, JJ. .
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 991
Pages: 193–193

Head Matter:
Frank PHILLIPS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 74511.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
May 11, 1999.
Donald R. Hoff, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before JAMES A. PUDLOWSKI, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, Jr., and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, JJ. .

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant Frank Phillips appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after a hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(j)(1995). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).