Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PEI ZHI HUANG, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-04-19
Citations: 228 F. App'x 731
Docket Number: No. 05-50928
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PEI ZHI HUANG, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 228
Pages: 731–732

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PEI ZHI HUANG, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-50928.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 16, 2007 .
Filed April 19, 2007.
Becky S. Walker, Esq., Michael S. Lowe, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Wayne R. Young, Esq., Santa Monica, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Pei Zhi Huang appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and the 70-month sentence imposed for conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute MDMA (ecstasy), conspiracy to money launder, and perjury, all in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, 841(a)(1), and 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h), 1621(2).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Huang's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.