Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FOUR PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN GREENE AND TUSCALOOSA COUNTIES IN THE STATE OF ALABAMA, etc.; J.C. Pate, Jr.; Rita Pate; et al., Defendants, Donald K. Daniel, Claimant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1990-04-23
Citations: 902 F.2d 24
Docket Number: No. 89-7061
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FOUR PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN GREENE AND TUSCALOOSA COUNTIES IN THE STATE OF ALABAMA, etc.; J.C. Pate, Jr.; Rita Pate; et al., Defendants, Donald K. Daniel, Claimant-Appellee.
Judges: Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK, EDMONDSON, and COX, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 902
Pages: 24–24

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FOUR PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN GREENE AND TUSCALOOSA COUNTIES IN THE STATE OF ALABAMA, etc.; J.C. Pate, Jr.; Rita Pate; et al., Defendants, Donald K. Daniel, Claimant-Appellee.
No. 89-7061.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
April 23, 1990.
Frank W. Donaldson, U.S. Atty., James D. Ingram, Birmingham, Ala., for plaintiff-appellant.
John W. Kelly, Sikes & Kelly, Selma, Ala., for claimant-appellee.
Senior Judge Lewis R. Morgan has elected to participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 46(c).

Opinion:
ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK, EDMONDSON, and COX, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc with oral argument during the week of October 8, 1990, on a date hereafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.