Case Name: Henry M. Young vs. Lewiston, Augusta and Waterville Street Railway
Court: Maine Supreme Judicial Court
Jurisdiction: Maine
Decision Date: 1916-10-28
Citations: 115 Me. 554
Docket Number: 
Parties: Henry M. Young vs. Lewiston, Augusta and Waterville Street Railway.
Judges: 
Reporter: Maine Reports
Volume: 115
Pages: 554–554

Head Matter:
Henry M. Young vs. Lewiston, Augusta and Waterville Street Railway.
Androscoggin.
Decided October 28, 1916.
Tascus Atwood, for plaintiff. Newell & Woodside, for defendant.

Opinion:
In this case the plaintiff was the owner of the team driven by the plaintiff in case of Taylor v. L. A. & W. St. Ry., and he seeks to recover damages for the injury to the team caused by the collision. The case is governed by the same rules of law as Taylor v. L. A. & W. St. Ry., and the judgment must be the same as the judgment in that case. Motion overruled.