Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hugh L. McGOWAN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-05-09
Citations: 504 F. App'x 511
Docket Number: No. 12-3396
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hugh L. McGOWAN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge, DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge and DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 504
Pages: 511–512

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hugh L. McGOWAN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-3396.
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Submitted May 9, 2013.
Decided May 9, 2013.
Jonathan H. Koenig, Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Milwaukee, WI, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Jonathan E. Hawley, Federal Public Defender, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Peoria, IL, A. Brian Threlkeld, Attorney, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Urbana, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge, DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge and DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
Hugh McGowan trafficked cocaine from Chicago for sale to buyers in Wisconsin's Fox River Valley. Drug Enforcement Administration agents made 45 controlled buys from dealers in the region, many of whom had ties to McGowan, and the agents arrested McGowan after executing a search warrant on his house. He pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute crack cocaine, and possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). McGowan's plea agreement included a waiver of his right to appeal any sentence below the statutory maximum that did not result from ineffective assistance of counsel or consideration of constitutionally impermissible factors. The district court imposed 180 months' imprisonment and 5 years' supervised release. McGowan filed a notice of appeal, but his appellate counsel has concluded that the appeal is frivolous and moves to withdraw under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). McGowan has not responded to counsel's submission. See Cir. R. 51(b). We review only the potential issues identified in counsel's facially adequate brief. See United States v. Schuh, 289 F.3d 968, 973-74 (7th Cir.2002).
McGowan has told counsel that he does not want his guilty plea set aside, so counsel properly omits from his Anders submission any discussion about the adequacy of the plea colloquy or the voluntariness of the plea. See United States v. Konczak, 683 F.3d 348, 349 (7th Cir.2012); United States v. Knox, 287 F.3d 667, 670-72 (7th Cir.2002). It follows, says counsel, that McGowan's appeal waiver makes this appeal frivolous. We agree with counsel; because an appeal waiver stands or falls with the guilty plea, United States v. Zitt, Nos. 12-1277, 12-2865, — F.3d -, -, 2013 WL 1501956, at *4 (7th Cir. Apr. 15, 2013); United States v. Sakellarion, 649 F.3d 634, 639 (7th Cir.2011), McGowan's waiver must be enforced. Moreover, no element of his sentence exceeds a statutory maximum, see 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(l)(A)(iii), (b)(l)(B)(iii), and the court did not rely on any unconstitutional factor when imposing McGowan's sentence.
The motion to withdraw is Granted, and the appeal is Dismissed.