Case Name: LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, Petitioner v. CHARLES G. COUCH, JR.; JOE C. YOUNG, TRUSTEE, U/A DATED DECEMBER 24, 1992 WITH WAYNE T. UPCHURCH AND ELIZABETH C. UPCHURCH, KNOWN AS THE BARRY UPCHURCH TRUST; JOE C. YOUNG, TRUSTEE, U/A DATED DECEMBER 24, 1992 WITH WAYNE T. UPCHURCH AND ELIZABETH C. UPCHURCH, KNOWN AS THE GRAVES UPCHURCH TRUST, Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 2007-11-09
Citations: 361 N.C. 684
Docket Number: No. 412PA06
Parties: LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, Petitioner v. CHARLES G. COUCH, JR.; JOE C. YOUNG, TRUSTEE, U/A DATED DECEMBER 24, 1992 WITH WAYNE T. UPCHURCH AND ELIZABETH C. UPCHURCH, KNOWN AS THE BARRY UPCHURCH TRUST; JOE C. YOUNG, TRUSTEE, U/A DATED DECEMBER 24, 1992 WITH WAYNE T. UPCHURCH AND ELIZABETH C. UPCHURCH, KNOWN AS THE GRAVES UPCHURCH TRUST, Respondents
Judges: Justice HUDSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
Reporter: North Carolina Reports
Volume: 361
Pages: 684–684

Head Matter:
LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, Petitioner v. CHARLES G. COUCH, JR.; JOE C. YOUNG, TRUSTEE, U/A DATED DECEMBER 24, 1992 WITH WAYNE T. UPCHURCH AND ELIZABETH C. UPCHURCH, KNOWN AS THE BARRY UPCHURCH TRUST; JOE C. YOUNG, TRUSTEE, U/A DATED DECEMBER 24, 1992 WITH WAYNE T. UPCHURCH AND ELIZABETH C. UPCHURCH, KNOWN AS THE GRAVES UPCHURCH TRUST, Respondents
No. 412PA06
(Filed 9 November 2007)
On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous, unpublished decision of the Court of Appeals, 178 N.C. App. 390, 631 S.E.2d 237 (2006), affirming a judgment entered on 30 March 2005 and an order entered on 26 May 2005, both by Judge Timothy L. Patti in Superior Court, Mecklenburg County. Heard in the Supreme Court 16 October 2007.
Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, PLLC, by Burley B. Mitchell, Jr., Mark P. Henriques, and Sarah A. Motley, for petitioner-appellant.
James, McElroy & Diehl, P.A., by Bruce M. Simpson, for respondent-appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
Justice HUDSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.