Case Name: Donetta Michelle BYRD-SANDERS, Appellant v. CHILD SUPPORT, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-11-20
Citations: 707 F. App'x 6
Docket Number: No. 17-7110
Parties: Donetta Michelle BYRD-SANDERS, Appellant v. CHILD SUPPORT, Appellee
Judges: BEFORE: Kavanaugh and Millett, Circuit Judges, and Ginsburg, Senior Circuit Judge
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 707
Pages: 6–7

Head Matter:
Donetta Michelle BYRD-SANDERS, Appellant v. CHILD SUPPORT, Appellee
No. 17-7110
September Term, 2017
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Filed On: November 20, 2017
Donetta Michelle Byrd-Sanders, Pro Se
Loren L. AliKhan, Deputy Solicitor General, Office of the Attorney General, District of Columbia, Office of the Solicitor General, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee
BEFORE: Kavanaugh and Millett, Circuit Judges, and Ginsburg, Senior Circuit Judge

Opinion:
JUDGMENT
Per Curiam
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's June 5, 2017 order be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed the case without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because it is not a civil action arising under federal law, see 28 U.S.C. § 1331, or between citizens of different states with an amount in controversy of more than $75,000, see 28 U.S.C. § 1332; nor does the complaint allege any other basis for the district court's jurisdiction.
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.