Case Name: H. Ryan HUTCHINSON, Appellant, v. PENSKE TRUCK LEASING COMPANY and Penske Corporation, Keystone Foods North America, Freightliner, L.L.C. and McDonald's Corporation, Appellees; H. Ryan Hutchinson, Appellant, v. Penske Truck Leasing Company and Penske Corporation and Freightliner, L.L.C., Appellees
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2007-05-31
Citations: 592 Pa. 38
Docket Number: Appeal Nos. 10 EAP 2006, 11 EAP 2006
Parties: H. Ryan HUTCHINSON, Appellant, v. PENSKE TRUCK LEASING COMPANY and Penske Corporation, Keystone Foods North America, Freightliner, L.L.C. and McDonald’s Corporation, Appellees, H. Ryan Hutchinson, Appellant, v. Penske Truck Leasing Company and Penske Corporation and Freightliner, L.L.C., Appellees.
Judges: BEFORE: CAPPY, C.J., and CASTILLE, NEWMAN, SAYLOR, EAKIN, BAER and BALDWIN, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 592
Pages: 38–39

Head Matter:
922 A.2d 890
H. Ryan HUTCHINSON, Appellant, v. PENSKE TRUCK LEASING COMPANY and Penske Corporation, Keystone Foods North America, Freightliner, L.L.C. and McDonald’s Corporation, Appellees, H. Ryan Hutchinson, Appellant, v. Penske Truck Leasing Company and Penske Corporation and Freightliner, L.L.C., Appellees.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued Oct. 16, 2006.
Decided May 31, 2007.
Dean F. Murtagh, Esq., Christina J. Westall, Esq., German, Gallagher & Murtagh, P.C., Philadelphia, for amicus curiae Pennsylvania Defense Institute.
John S. Bagby, Jr., Esq., Bagby & Associates, Philadelphia, for H. Ryan Hutchinson.
David C. Harrison, Esq., Philadelphia, for amicus curiae Pennsylvania Trial Lawyers Association.
Nancy L. Winkelman, Esq., Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis, L.L.P., Wilbur Bourne Ruthrauff, Esq., Bennett, Bricklin & Saltzburg, L.L.P., Philadelphia, for Freightliner, L.L.C.
Edward J. Tuite, Esq., Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin, P.C., Philadelphia, for Penske Truck Leasing Company and Penske Corporation.
BEFORE: CAPPY, C.J., and CASTILLE, NEWMAN, SAYLOR, EAKIN, BAER and BALDWIN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 31st day of May, 2007, the order of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.
Former Justice NEWMAN did not participate in the decision of this case.