Case Name: MANUEL MENDEZ, Appellant, v. Manfred MAASS, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1992-05-20
Citations: 113 Or. App. 231
Docket Number: 90C-10239; CA A64202
Parties: MANUEL MENDEZ, Appellant, v. Manfred MAASS, Respondent.
Judges: Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Deits and Durham, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 113
Pages: 231–231

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted April 24,
affirmed May 20,
reconsideration denied June 24,
petition for review allowed by memorandum decision October 8, 1992
See 314 Or 385 (1992)
MANUEL MENDEZ, Appellant, v. Manfred MAASS, Respondent.
(90C-10239; CA A64202)
830 P2d 636
Velda H. Rogers, Keizer, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.
Thomas H. Denney, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.
Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Deits and Durham, Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Affirmed. Boone v. Wright, 110 Or App 281, 822 P2d 719 (1991), rev allowed 313 Or 209 (1992).