Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cynthia Damariz SALAMANCA, a/k/a Alicebeth Nazario, a/k/a Marisabel Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-11-24
Citations: 585 F. App'x 264
Docket Number: No. 14-6498
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cynthia Damariz SALAMANCA, a/k/a Alicebeth Nazario, a/k/a Marisabel Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 585
Pages: 264–264

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cynthia Damariz SALAMANCA, a/k/a Alicebeth Nazario, a/k/a Marisabel Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 14-6498.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 20, 2014.
Decided: Nov. 24, 2014.
Cynthia Damariz Salamanca, Appellant Pro Se. Erik Sean Siebert, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before KING and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Cynthia Damariz Salamanca seeks to appeal the district court's order denying her Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the district court's order denying relief on her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2258(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating' that reasonable jurists would find that the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.
We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Salamanca has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauper-is, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.