Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rey Rocky RAMIREZ-GOMEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-12-12
Citations: 156 F. App'x 970
Docket Number: No. 04-10389; D.C. No. CR-03-20075-JF/PVT
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Rey Rocky RAMIREZ-GOMEZ, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before GOODWIN, W. FLETCHER, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 156
Pages: 970–971

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Rey Rocky RAMIREZ-GOMEZ, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 04-10389.
D.C. No. CR-03-20075-JF/PVT.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 5, 2005.
Decided Dec. 12, 2005.
Before GOODWIN, W. FLETCHER, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Rey Rocky Ramirez-Gomez appeals the 46-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction to one count of reentry by a deported alien in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1826. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
Because Ramirez-Gomez was sentenced under the then-mandatory Sentencing Guidelines, and we cannot reliably determine from the record whether the sentence imposed would have been materially different had the district court known that the Guidelines were advisory, we remand to the sentencing court for further proceedings consistent with United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir. 2005) (en banc). See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez, 419 F.3d 906, 916 (9th Cir.2005).
REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.