Case Name: Emanuel N. Bisso, Respondent, v. Mildred B. Bisso et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1945-11-16
Citations: 269 A.D. 978
Docket Number: 
Parties: Emanuel N. Bisso, Respondent, v. Mildred B. Bisso et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 269
Pages: 978–978

Head Matter:
Emanuel N. Bisso, Respondent, v. Mildred B. Bisso et al., Appellants.

Opinion:
Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Callahan and Wasservogel, JJ.; Callahan, J., dissents as to the second separate, distinct and affirmative defense in the proposed amended answer of defendant Mildred Bedell Da Gama and votes to grant the • motion of said defendant for leave to amend her answer on the ground that because of the nature of the action (one for declaratory judgment) said defense is a proper one. [See post, p. 1024.]