Case Name: Joseph A. ROSS v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1952-06-26
Citations: 197 F.2d 525
Docket Number: No. 10655
Parties: Joseph A. ROSS v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 197
Pages: 525–525

Head Matter:
Joseph A. ROSS v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant.
No. 10655.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued June 2, 1952.
Decided June 26, 1952.
Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and KA-LODNER and STALEY, Circuit Judges.
Bruce R. Martin, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Dal-zell, Pringle, Bredin & Martin, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.
Sylvan Libson, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Harrison & Libson, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
An examination of the record discloses substantial evidence of negligence to sustain the jury's verdict against the defendant. Blair v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., 323 U.S. 600, 604, 65 S.Ct. 545, 89 L.Ed. 490. Cf. Lukon v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 3 Cir., 131 F.2d 327, 328. The evidence also shows that the plaintiff's act was not the sole efficient cause of the injury. A careful examination of the record and review of the briefs and oral argument convince us that the court below committed no prejudicial error. Consequently the judgment will be affirmed.