Case Name: Leon Decorating Co., Inc., Appellant, v. Fifth Avenue Realty Corp., Respondent, et al., Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1948-01-29
Citations: 191 Misc. 89
Docket Number: 
Parties: Leon Decorating Co., Inc., Appellant, v. Fifth Avenue Realty Corp., Respondent, et al., Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 191
Pages: 89–90

Head Matter:
Leon Decorating Co., Inc., Appellant, v. Fifth Avenue Realty Corp., Respondent, et al., Defendant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
January 29, 1948.
Jesse H. Barkin and Manuel Tancer for appellant.
George Popkin for respondent.

Opinion:
Memorandum Per Curiam.
Defendant 0 'Kane, as lessee, was obligated under the terms of the lease made with defendant-respondent Fifth Avenue Realty Corp., the owner, to do certain alteration work. This was a sufficient consent to make the owner liable for the painting work necessarily done by plaintiff in connection with the alteration. It was not necessary that plaintiff obtain a separate consent from the owner in order to be afforded the protection given by section 3 of the Lien Law.
The judgment should be reversed, with costs, and judgment directed for plaintiff, with costs.