Case Name: CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 13J, POLK COUNTY, OREGON, Appellant, v. MARION DISTRICT BOUNDARY BOARD, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1988-05-18
Citations: 91 Or. App. 314
Docket Number: 87C-10263; CA A45356, A45731
Parties: CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 13J, POLK COUNTY, OREGON, Appellant, v. MARION DISTRICT BOUNDARY BOARD, Respondent.
Judges: Before Warren, Presiding Judge and Rossman, Judge, and Riggs, Judge pro tempore.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 91
Pages: 314–315

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted April 15,
affirmed May 18, 1988
CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 13J, POLK COUNTY, OREGON, Appellant, v. MARION DISTRICT BOUNDARY BOARD, Respondent.
(87C-10263; CA A45356 (Control), A45731)
(Cases Consolidated)
754 P2d 923
Scott McArthur, Monmouth, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.
William G. Paulus, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Garrett, Seideman, Hemann, Robertson and De Muniz, P.C.
Before Warren, Presiding Judge and Rossman, Judge, and Riggs, Judge pro tempore.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Appellant appeals from a judgment dismissing for lack of jurisdiction its petition for a writ of review to challenge an order by respondent transferring certain property from Central School District to Salem-Keizer School District. Initial review of a boundary board order lies either in this court or before the State Board of Education, depending on the procedure under which the petition was brought. Central School (Beaman I) v. Marion District, 88 Or App 85, 87, 744 P2d 284 (1987) , rev den 305 Or 45 (1988); see also Central School Dist. v. State Board of Education, 91 Or App 308, 754 P2d 923 (1988) . Accordingly, the circuit court properly dismissed the petition.
Affirmed.