Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas A. IODICE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-01-26
Citations: 453 F. App'x 933
Docket Number: No. 11-14156
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas A. IODICE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before EDMONDSON, HULL and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 453
Pages: 933–934

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas A. IODICE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-14156
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Jan. 26, 2012.
Robert G. Davies, Randall Joseph Hen-sel, Kenneth S. Korea, J. Ryan Love, Pamela C. Marsh, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Pensacola, FL, Terry Flynn, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tallahassee, FL, Gayle Little-ton, Kathryn D. Risinger, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Panama City, FL, for Plaintiff-Ap-pellee.
Chet Kaufman, Charles William Lam-mers, Randolph P. Murrell, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Tallahassee, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Thomas A. Iodice, Miami, FL, pro se.
Before EDMONDSON, HULL and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Thomas Iodice in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Iodice's supervised release revocation and sentence are AFFIRMED.