Case Name: Charles SEELY. Appellant, v. The HERTZ CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, and William Taylor, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1970-02-20
Citations: 231 So. 2d 547
Docket Number: No. 69-293
Parties: Charles SEELY. Appellant, v. The HERTZ CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, and William Taylor, Appellees.
Judges: WALDEN, REED, and OWEN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 231
Pages: 547–548

Head Matter:
Charles SEELY. Appellant, v. The HERTZ CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, and William Taylor, Appellees.
No. 69-293.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.
Feb. 20, 1970.
Council Wooten, Jr., of Billings & Frederick, Orlando, for appellant.
R. G. Ross, of Pitts, Eubanks & Ross, Orlando, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have examined the record and the appellate presentation and find that the presumption of correctness which accompanies orders allowing a new trial has not been overcome. No abuse of discretion having been demonstrated, the order granting a new trial is hereby affirmed. Cloud v. Fallis, Fla. 1959, 110 So.2d 669; City of Fort Pierce v. Cooper, Fla.App.1966, 190 So.2d 12; and Volk v. Goetz, Fla.App. 1967, 206 So.2d 250; 2 Fla.Jur., Appeals, § 317.
Affirmed.
WALDEN, REED, and OWEN, JJ., concur.