Case Name: John Fitzgerald ROBINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2013-07-03
Citations: 117 So. 3d 846
Docket Number: No. 4D12-596
Parties: John Fitzgerald ROBINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: MAY, GERBER and LEVINE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 117
Pages: 846–846

Head Matter:
John Fitzgerald ROBINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D12-596.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
July 3, 2013.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender and Tom Wm. Odom, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melanie Dale Surber, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant appeals his convictions and sentences for burglary of an occupied dwelling while masked and resisting an officer without violence, raising three issues. Appellant argues that (1) the trial court erred in admitting a flashlight into evidence that was found on appellant when he was arrested; (2) ineffective assistance of counsel appears on the face of the record due to defense counsel's failure to persist in a motion for mistrial after the prosecutor found a glove in the hat worn by appellant; and (3) the trial court failed to conduct an inquiry under Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975), after appellant indicated he did not wish for his counsel to proceed with the mistrial motion. We find each of these issues to be without merit, and therefore, we affirm. As to appellant's second issue, we find only that ineffective assistance of counsel is not apparent on the face of the record. See Ellerbee v. State, 87 So.3d 730, 739 (Fla.2012) ("An ineffective assistance of counsel claim may be brought on direct appeal only in the 'rare' instance where (1) the ineffectiveness is apparent on the face of the record, and (2) it would be 'a waste of judicial resources to require the trial court to address the issue.' ") (citation omitted).
Affirmed.
MAY, GERBER and LEVINE, JJ., concur.