Case Name: Vincent PITTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EDO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED, t/a Aera, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-05-11
Citations: 182 F. App'x 173
Docket Number: No. 05-1978
Parties: Vincent PITTS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. EDO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED, t/a Aera, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 182
Pages: 173–173

Head Matter:
Vincent PITTS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. EDO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED, t/a Aera, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 05-1978.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 7, 2006.
Decided: May 11, 2006.
Vincent Pitts, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher E. Hassell, Bonner, Kiernan, Trebach & Crociata, L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Vincent Pitts appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of his former employer in his employment discrimination action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the submissions of the parties and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See Pitts v. EDO Prof'l Servs., Inc., No. CA-05-215-1 (E.D.Va. Aug. 8, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.