Case Name: Save Way Oil Co., Inc., Appellant, v. Harry Rosen, Respondent, et al., Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1984-02-29
Citations: 125 Misc. 2d 26
Docket Number: 
Parties: Save Way Oil Co., Inc., Appellant, v Harry Rosen, Respondent, et al., Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 125
Pages: 26–27

Head Matter:
Save Way Oil Co., Inc., Appellant, v Harry Rosen, Respondent, et al., Defendants.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
February 29, 1984
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Brian A. Sheridan for appellant. Silberzweig & Sznitken (Neil Sznitken of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order dated June 23, 1982 affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order dated July 7, 1982 dismissed as moot. Order dated February 15, 1983 reversed, without costs, and motion granted.
We find that the action of the court on the first order appealed from to be proper in that the notice to appear was not proper or relevant to these actions and was more appropriate for supplementary proceedings. Since the money, which is the subject of the restraining order, has been removed from the account in question, no issue exists for this court to determine. Finally, the court below should have granted the motion to consolidate the actions in that there are common issues of law and fact involved.
Buschmann, J. P., Jones and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.