Case Name: Mary Yasbec et al., Appellees, v. The Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Appellant, et al.
Court: Kansas Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Kansas
Decision Date: 1931-05-19
Citations: 133 Kan. 175
Docket Number: No. 29,867
Parties: Mary Yasbec et al., Appellees, v. The Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Appellant, et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Kansas Reports
Volume: 133
Pages: 175–175

Head Matter:
No. 29,867.
Mary Yasbec et al., Appellees, v. The Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Appellant, et al.
Opinion filed May 19, 1931.
(For original opinion of affirmance see 132 Kan. 827, 297 Pac. 422.)
C. O. Pingry, P. E. Nulton and G. L. Stevenson, all of Pittsburg, for the appellant.
Douglass Hudson, of Fort Scott, Phil H. Cattery and James E. Cattery, both of Pittsburg, for the appellees.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
Counsel for appellees direct our attention to a matter presented by a cross appeal which was not considered with the main case.
The judgment of the district court was that Mary Yasbec should recover the sum of $1,019.12, and her three children, Josephine, John and Angelia, the sums of $276.92, $724.84 and $1,019.12, respectively. What the district court's judgment did not make clear is that these sums should bear interest at the statutory rate of 6 per cent from the date of the arbitrator's award, September 24,1926, until the rendition of the judgment in the district court, April 11,1930. Such allowances of interest should have been clearly specified in the judgment. The proper computations to that effect should yet be made (Farmers State Bank v. Crow, 126 Kan. 395, 404, 267 Pac. 1100), and the district court is directed to modify its judgment accordingly.