Case Name: Barney Earl CRUTCHFIELD, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Jim Smith, Respondents-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1985-12-19
Citations: 779 F.2d 1466
Docket Number: No. 84-3508
Parties: Barney Earl CRUTCHFIELD, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Jim Smith, Respondents-Appellants.
Judges: Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, RO-NEY, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HENDERSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON and CLARK, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 779
Pages: 1466–1466

Head Matter:
Barney Earl CRUTCHFIELD, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Jim Smith, Respondents-Appellants.
No. 84-3508.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Dec. 19, 1985.
Thomas H. Bateman, III, Dept, of Legal Affairs, Tallahassee, Fla., for respondents-appellants.
Gwendolyn Spivey, Tallahassee, Fla., for petitioner-appellee.

Opinion:
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion October 3, 1985, 11th Cir., 1985, 772 F.2d 839)
Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, RO-NEY, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HENDERSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON and CLARK, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by this Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.