Case Name: Ron LOFTIN, Sr. v. CREWS & ASSOCIATES, INC. and U.S. Associates, Inc., An Arkansas Corporation v. Crews & Associates, Inc.
Court: Arkansas Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Arkansas
Decision Date: 1989-05-22
Citations: 299 Ark. 1
Docket Number: 89-111
Parties: Ron LOFTIN, Sr. v. CREWS & ASSOCIATES, INC. and U.S. Associates, Inc., An Arkansas Corporation v. Crews & Associates, Inc.
Judges: 
Reporter: Arkansas Reports
Volume: 299
Pages: 1–2

Head Matter:
Ron LOFTIN, Sr. v. CREWS & ASSOCIATES, INC. and U.S. Associates, Inc., An Arkansas Corporation v. Crews & Associates, Inc.
89-111
771 S.W.2d 16
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Opinion delivered May 22, 1989
. Gary E. Johnson, for appellant.
Anderson & Kilpatrick, by: Overton S. Anderson, for appellee.

Opinion:
Robert H. Dudley, Justice.
The trial court granted a summary judgment in these consolidated cases. We affirm under Rule 9(d) of the Rules of the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals.
Appellant did not abstract the complaints, the answers, the motions for summary judgment, the affidavits, or the order consolidating the two lawsuits and granting summary judgment.
The abstract is flagrantly deficient and, therefore, we affirm.