Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mario Alberto RENTERIA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-08-19
Citations: 44 F. App'x 858
Docket Number: No. 01-50663; D.C. No. CR-01-00306-NAJ
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Mario Alberto RENTERIA, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 44
Pages: 858–859

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Mario Alberto RENTERIA, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 01-50663.
D.C. No. CR-01-00306-NAJ.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 12, 2002.
Decided Aug. 19, 2002.
Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, TASHIMA and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Mario Renteria appeals his conviction, pursuant to a stipulated facts agreement and trial, and sentence for being a deported alien found in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.
Renteria's attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and has moved to withdraw as counsel of record. Renteria did not file a pro se supplemental brief. Because our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), reveals no arguable issues, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw, and affirm the conviction and sentence.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.