Case Name: AT&T WIRELESS PCS INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF ATLANTA, Atlanta City Council, Robb Pitts, Vern McCarty, Debi Starnes, et. al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-08-10
Citations: 260 F.3d 1320
Docket Number: No. 00-15885
Parties: AT&T WIRELESS PCS INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF ATLANTA, Atlanta City Council, Robb Pitts, Vern McCarty, Debi Starnes, et. al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 260
Pages: 1320–1320

Head Matter:
AT&T WIRELESS PCS INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF ATLANTA, Atlanta City Council, Robb Pitts, Vern McCarty, Debi Starnes, et. al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 00-15885.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Aug. 10, 2001.
G. Wayne Hillis, Jr., Erika C. Birg, Parker, Hudson, Rainer & Dobbs, Atlanta, GA, Carter G. Phillips, Sidley & Austin, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
BY THE COURT:
A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on whether rehearing en banc should be granted, and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.