Case Name: Barbara D. GAITHER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Office of the General Counsel; Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-03-19
Citations: 318 F. App'x 209
Docket Number: No. 08-2241
Parties: Barbara D. GAITHER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Office of the General Counsel; Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 318
Pages: 209–209

Head Matter:
Barbara D. GAITHER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Office of the General Counsel; Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 08-2241.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 17, 2009.
Decided: March 19, 2009.
Barbara D. Gaither, Appellant Pro Se. Charlene Patricia Bellinger-Honig, Social Security Administration, Elisa Frances
Donohoe, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appel-lees.
Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Barbara D. Gaither appeals the district court's order affirming the Commissioner's denial of Gaither's applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. We must uphold the Commissioner's disability determination if the decision is supported by substantial evidence and the correct law was applied. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2006); Craig v. Chater, 76 F.3d 585, 589 (4th Cir.1996). We have reviewed the record and the district court's order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.