Case Name: Frank J. Dupignac, as Committee, etc., Respondent, v. August Quick, Appellant
Court: New York City Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1899-03
Citations: 26 Misc. 872
Docket Number: 
Parties: Frank J. Dupignac, as Committee, etc., Respondent, v. August Quick, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 26
Pages: 872–872

Head Matter:
Frank J. Dupignac, as Committee, etc., Respondent, v. August Quick, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff.
Loftus & Caffrey (Patrick H. Loftus, of counsel), for appellant.
Henry B. Culver, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We think that the tender upon the trial of the bond offered and approved by the court was sufficient. Code, § 1917..
The plaintiff was not bound in his complaint to allege the loss of the note sued upon, nor was he bound to offer sooner than he did the bond mentioned.
Present: Fitzsimons, Ch. J., and Schuchman, J.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.