Case Name: In the Matter of 61 Jane Street Associates, Appellant, v. New York City Conciliation and Appeals Board et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1985-07-11
Citations: 65 N.Y. 898
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of 61 Jane Street Associates, Appellant, v New York City Conciliation and Appeals Board et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 65
Pages: 898–900

Head Matter:
In the Matter of 61 Jane Street Associates, Appellant, v New York City Conciliation and Appeals Board et al., Respondents.
Decided July 11, 1985
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Richard F. Czaja for appellant.
Cullen S. McVoy for respondents.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs. It cannot be said that the determination of lawful rent was either arbitrary or capricious, or that the remedy imposed was disproportionate under the circumstances.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Titone. Taking no part: Judge Alexander.