Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. TODD HARDWICK, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1994-03-23
Citations: 127 Or. App. 134
Docket Number: M92-1170; CA A79380
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. TODD HARDWICK, Appellant.
Judges: Before Rossman, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Leeson, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 127
Pages: 134–135

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted February 4,
convictions affirmed and order of restitution vacated March 23, 1994
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. TODD HARDWICK, Appellant.
(M92-1170; CA A79380)
871 P2d 506
Stephen P. Riedlinger argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.
Harrison Latto, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.
Before Rossman, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Leeson, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant and his wife both pleaded guilty to criminal trespass. ORS 164.245. After a joint sentencing hearing, the trial court suspended imposition of sentence and placed defendant and his wife on probation. It also ordered that defendant and his wife were jointly and severally liable to pay $2,000 in restitution to the victim. That sentence exceeded the maximum allowable by law, because the state failed to present any evidence that the victim suffered pecuniary damages. State v. Hardwick (A79379), 127 Or App 132, 871 P2d 505 (1994).
Conviction affirmed; order of restitution vacated.