Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christian RODRIGUEZ, a/k/a Christian Duenas, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-06-24
Citations: 137 F. App'x 82
Docket Number: No. 04-30233
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Christian RODRIGUEZ, a/k/a Christian Duenas, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: KLEINFELD, TASHIMA, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 137
Pages: 82–83

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Christian RODRIGUEZ, a/k/a Christian Duenas, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 04-30233.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 14, 2005.
Decided June 24, 2005.
Rafael M. Gonzalez, Jr., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Boise, ID, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Greg S. Silvey, Esq., Boise, ID, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: KLEINFELD, TASHIMA, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Christian Rodriguez appeals the 120-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to one count of distribution of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 846. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
We dismiss in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2000) (stating that an appeal waiver is valid when it is entered into knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Cardenas, 405 F.3d 1046, 1048 (9th Cir.2005) (holding that the changes in sentencing law imposed by United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), did not render waiver of appeal involuntary and unknowing).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.