Case Name: L. E. LAMPLEY v. STATE
Court: Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1946-02-20
Citations: 82 Okla. Crim. 100
Docket Number: No. A-10527
Parties: L. E. LAMPLEY v. STATE.
Judges: JONES, P. J., concurs. DOYLE, J., not participating.
Reporter: Oklahoma Criminal Reports
Volume: 82
Pages: 100–101

Head Matter:
L. E. LAMPLEY v. STATE.
No. A-10527.
Feb. 20, 1946.
(166 P. 2d 450.)
S. E. Dunn, of Tulsa, for plaintiff in error.
Randell S. Cobb, Atty. Gen., Sam H. Lattimore, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Dixie Gilmer, Co. Atty., of Tulsa, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
BAREFOOT, J.
Defendant, L. E. Lampley, was charged in the court of common pleas of Tulsa county with the offense of requiring and permitting one Joan Ward, a female person, to work in his restaurant in the city of Tulsa more tlian nine hours, to-wit: 12 hours, from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m., on the 13th day of August, 1943. He was tried, convicted and sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and costs, and has appealed.
This is a companion case of Lampley v. State, 82 Okla. Cr. 95, 166 P. 2d 445. In that case this defendant was charged with requiring and permitting one Joan Ward, a female person, to work in a cafe managed and operated by the defendant more than 54 hours in one week, to wit: from and inclusive of August 1, 1943 to and inclusive of August 7, 1943, from 7 o'clock a.m. until 7 o'clock p.m., on each date.
The evidence and questions of law are identical in both cases, and the same statute, 4Ó O. S. 1941 § 81, covers both charges. One brief has been filed by defendant in support of his contentions.
For the reasons stated in the case of Lampley v. State, 82 Okla. Cr. 95, 166 P. 2d 445, the judgment and sentence of the court of common pleas of Tulsa county is affirmed.
JONES, P. J., concurs. DOYLE, J., not participating.