Case Name: Robert J. REARDON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-01-03
Citations: 806 So. 2d 446
Docket Number: No. SC00-1395
Parties: Robert J. REARDON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 806
Pages: 446–446

Head Matter:
Robert J. REARDON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. SC00-1395.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Jan. 3, 2002.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and John M. Selden, Assistant Public Defender, Seventh Judicial Circuit, Daytona Beach, FL, for Petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Kellie A. Nielan, Denise 0. Simpson, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorneys General, Daytona Beach, FL, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted review of the decision in State v. Reardon, 763 So.2d 418 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000), based on alleged express and direct conflict with Thompson v. State, 650 So.2d 969 (Fla.1994), Goodwin v. State, 634 So.2d 157 (Fla.1994), and Sirmons v. State, 634 So.2d 153 (Fla.1994). Upon further consideration, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction.
It is so ordered.
WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., concur.