Case Name: JACK LAUDER, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1939-08-11
Citations: 34 Cal. App. 2d 730
Docket Number: Civ. No. 12393
Parties: JACK LAUDER, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports, Second Series
Volume: 34
Pages: 730–731

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 12393.
Second Appellate District, Division One.
August 11, 1939.]
JACK LAUDER, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent.
Orloff & Katz and Abraham Corenfeld for Petitioner.

Opinion:
THE COURT.
We have this day filed a memorandum in the case of Rex, Inc., v. Superior Court, Civil No. 12389 (ante, p. 96 [93 Pac. (2d) 182].) For the reasons therein given the petition for a writ of prohibition is denied.
York, P. J., being absent, did not participate herein.