Case Name: Roxie A. CLARK, individually, and as mother and next friend of Tiara Arnice Street, a minor, and William E. Street, individually, and as father and next friend of Tiara Arnice Street, a minor, Appellants, v. REPUBLIC HEALTH CORP. OF NORTH MIAMI, a Florida corporation, as General Partner of North Miami Medical Center, Ltd, a Florida Limited Partnership, d/b/a/ Parkway Medical Center, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-02-07
Citations: 667 So. 2d 502
Docket Number: No. 95-2587
Parties: Roxie A. CLARK, individually, and as mother and next friend of Tiara Arnice Street, a minor, and William E. Street, individually, and as father and next friend of Tiara Arnice Street, a minor, Appellants, v. REPUBLIC HEALTH CORP. OF NORTH MIAMI, a Florida corporation, as General Partner of North Miami Medical Center, Ltd, a Florida Limited Partnership, d/b/a/ Parkway Medical Center, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and LEVY and GODERICH, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 667
Pages: 502–502

Head Matter:
Roxie A. CLARK, individually, and as mother and next friend of Tiara Arnice Street, a minor, and William E. Street, individually, and as father and next friend of Tiara Arnice Street, a minor, Appellants, v. REPUBLIC HEALTH CORP. OF NORTH MIAMI, a Florida corporation, as General Partner of North Miami Medical Center, Ltd, a Florida Limited Partnership, d/b/a/ Parkway Medical Center, Appellee.
No. 95-2587.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 7, 1996.
William A. Cain, N. Miami Beach, for appellants.
Conroy, Simberg & Lewis and Robert I. Buchsbaum, Hollywood, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and LEVY and GODERICH, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In view of the fact that the allegations in the Complaint clearly state a cause of action, it was error for the trial court to have dismissed it. See Ralph v. City of Daytona Beach, 471 So.2d 1 (Fla.1983); Connolly v. Sebeco, Inc., 89 So.2d 482 (Fla.1956). Accordingly, the improvidently entered order of dismissal is reversed, and this cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent herewith.
Reversed and remanded.