Case Name: STATE v. WILLIAM RADICK
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1926-10-05
Citations: 119 Or. 408
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE v. WILLIAM RADICK.
Judges: McBride, C. J., and Burnett and Coshow, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 119
Pages: 408–408

Head Matter:
Submitted on briefs September 23,
reversed and remanded October 5, 1926.
STATE v. WILLIAM RADICK.
(249 Pac. 626.)
(No Syllabus.)
For appellant there was a brief over the names of Messrs. Peck & Brand and Mr. J. P. Anderson.
For respondent there was a brief over the name of Mr. J. B. Bedingfield, District Attorney.

Opinion:
BELT, J.
It has been stipulated that the decision of this court in the case of State v. Tony Milosevich shall be accepted as the decision in the above-entitled cause. Both cases were tried before the same court and jury and involve the same question on appeal.
In State v. Tony Milosevich, ante, p. 404 (249 Pac. 625), in an opinion this day rendered, the cause, on account of an erroneous instruction was reversed and remanded for a new trial. It follows that the same order will be entered herein.
Reversed and Remanded.
McBride, C. J., and Burnett and Coshow, JJ., concur.