Case Name: ANDREW WENTWORTH GATES, Appellant, v. SHERIFF, CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada
Jurisdiction: Nevada
Decision Date: 1975-11-21
Citations: 91 Nev. 753
Docket Number: No. 8068
Parties: ANDREW WENTWORTH GATES, Appellant, v. SHERIFF, CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Nevada Reports
Volume: 91
Pages: 753–754

Head Matter:
ANDREW WENTWORTH GATES, Appellant, v. SHERIFF, CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA, Respondent.
No. 8068
November 21, 1975
542 P.2d 736
Morgan D. Harris, Public Defender, and Stephen L. Huf-faker and Herbert F. Ahlswede, Deputy Public Defenders, Clark County, for Appellant.
Robert List, Attorney General, Carson City; George Holt, District Attorney, and H. Leon Simon, Deputy District Attorney, Clark County, for Respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION
Per Curiam:
In this appeal, Andrew Wentworth Gates contends that the capital murder statute under which he was charged is unconstitutional because of vagueness, and he further challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to hold him for trial on a capital murder charge. We reject both contentions.
Appellant's constitutional challenge was considered and rejected by this court in Sheriff v. Smith, 91 Nev. 729, 542 P.2d 440 (1975). In our view, the quantum and quality of the evidence adduced at the preliminary examination justified the magistrate's order holding the appellant for trial. NRS 171.206. State v. Fuchs, 78 Nev. 63, 368 P.2d 869 (1962); Ervin v. Leypoldt, 76 Nev. 297, 352 P.2d 718 (1960); Raggio v. Bryan, 76 Nev. 1, 348 P.2d 156 (1960); Ex parte Liotard, 47 Nev. 169, 217 P. 960 (1923); In re Kelly, 28 Nev. 491, 83. P. 223 (1905).
The order of the district court denying appellant's petition for habeas corpus is affirmed.
NRS 200.030, subsection 1(e), as amended, Stats. Nev. 1973, ch. 798, § 5, at 1803:
"1. Capital murder is murder which is perpetrated by:
"(e) Killing more than one person as the result of a common plan, scheme or design."