Case Name: Meyer-Kiser Corporation, a Florida Corporation, Plaintiff in Error, v. Frank M. Dooley, Defendant in Error
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1930-07-23
Citations: 100 Fla. 243
Docket Number: 
Parties: Meyer-Kiser Corporation, a Florida Corporation, Plaintiff in Error, v. Frank M. Dooley, Defendant in Error.
Judges: Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 100
Pages: 243–243

Head Matter:
Meyer-Kiser Corporation, a Florida Corporation, Plaintiff in Error, v. Frank M. Dooley, Defendant in Error.
Division B.
Decision filed July 23, 1930.
Loftin, Stokes & Galkins, for Plaintiff in Error;
II. II. Taylor, Evans & Mershon and O. B. Simmons, Jr., for Defendant in Error.

Opinion:
Per. Curiam.
— In an action of assumpsit on the common counts judgment was rendered for the plaintiff for services performed for the defendant. On writ of error taken by the defendant it appears that the verdict is not sustained by proof of compensation fixed by express contract or by sufficient evidence as to the reasonable value of services rendered. The motion for new trial should have. been granted.
Reversed.
Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.
Ellis and Brown, J. J., dissent.