Case Name: LYN-RAND METAL FABRICATIONS, CO., INC., Appellant, v. AMERICAN ACCESSORIES CORP., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-07-12
Citations: 657 So. 2d 70
Docket Number: No. 94-24
Parties: LYN-RAND METAL FABRICATIONS, CO., INC., Appellant, v. AMERICAN ACCESSORIES CORP., Appellee.
Judges: Before COPE, GODERICH and GREEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 657
Pages: 70–70

Head Matter:
LYN-RAND METAL FABRICATIONS, CO., INC., Appellant, v. AMERICAN ACCESSORIES CORP., Appellee.
No. 94-24.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 12, 1995.
Paul Morris, Coral Gables, for appellant.
Lapidus & Frankel and Richard L. Lapi-dus, Miami, for appellee.
Before COPE, GODERICH and GREEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The defendant, Lyn-Rand Metal Fabrications, Co., Inc. [Lyn-Rand], appeals from an adverse final judgment. We affirm.
Lyn-Rand contends that the trial court erred by granting the plaintiffs motion in limine to exclude any evidence of a purported oral agreement modifying the terms of the written agreement that provided the basis for the action below. We disagree and find that the trial court properly excluded such evidence where Lyn-Rand never pled the oral agreement with specificity in any of its affirmative defenses. Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.110(d); Uvesco, Inc. v. Petersen, 295 So.2d 353 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974); Rod-Lyn Corp. v. DeBelay, 231 So.2d 233 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 238 So.2d 108 (Fla.1970). Additionally, we find that Lyn-Rand's remaining points lack merit.
Accordingly, we affirm.