Case Name: Louis Ott, Jr., Respondent, v. Ferdinand Wesel, as Executor of Ferdinand Wesel, Deceased, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1916-12-28
Citations: 219 N.Y. 671
Docket Number: 
Parties: Louis Ott, Jr., Respondent, v. Ferdinand Wesel, as Executor of Ferdinand Wesel, Deceased, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 219
Pages: 671–672

Head Matter:
Louis Ott, Jr., Respondent, v. Ferdinand Wesel, as Executor of Ferdinand Wesel, Deceased, Appellant.
Ott v. Wesel, 168 App. Div. 918, affirmed.
(Argued December 7, 1916;
decided December 28, 1916.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in ' the first judicial department, entered April 26, 1916, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury in an action on contract. On March 8, 1911, Ferdinand Wesel, the defendant’s testator, was the president of F. Wesel Manufacturing Company, a New York corporation, and was likewise a director and the owner of a majority of the stock of that corporation. It appears that Wesel, as president of F. Wesel Manufacturing Company, desired to employ plaintiff in the financial department of that company and to procure him to invest $5,000 in the business of the company by purchasing from the company $5,000 of its preferred stock at par and that Wesel individually and in order to induce him to make that contract with the company offered personally to give Ott out of Wesel’s own holdings twenty-five shares of the common stock of the company and further offered to purchase back from Ott the said stock of the company and pay him $5,000 therefor if at the end of the year Ott was not satisfied with his employment or his investment.. Plaintiff apparently was willing to go into the employ of the company upon these terms, and accordingly on March eighth an agreement to that effect was signed by Ott and Wesel; thereafter Ott elected to avail himself of the right to have Wesel or his estate take over his stock, and on January 14, 1913, being sixty days prior to March 15, 1913, he personally handed to Ferdinand Wesel, Jr., a notice to that effect, and thereafter brought this action to compel performance.
Wales F. Severance and Gustav Lange, Jr., for appellant.
Louis H. Hall for respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Willard Bartlett, Oh. J., Collin, Cuddebaok, Hogan, Oardozo and Pound, JJ. Absent: His-cock, J.