Case Name: Robert M. DAVIDSON; Vanessa E. Komar, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. Jay GROSSMAN; Eudice Grossman; Gayle F. Petrillo; Charles Ott; Joanne C. Wray; Kent J. Thiry; Joseph C. Mello; Michael J. Meehan; Bruce R. Heurlin; Anthony P. Tartaglia; Dva Renal Healthcare, Inc.; Albany Medical College; Vivra Holdings, Inc.; Gambro Healthcare, Inc.; Davita, Inc.; Sepracor, Inc., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-03-06
Citations: 268 F. App'x 343
Docket Number: No. 07-20650
Parties: Robert M. DAVIDSON; Vanessa E. Komar, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. Jay GROSSMAN; Eudice Grossman; Gayle F. Petrillo; Charles Ott; Joanne C. Wray; Kent J. Thiry; Joseph C. Mello; Michael J. Meehan; Bruce R. Heurlin; Anthony P. Tartag-lia; Dva Renal Healthcare, Inc.; Albany Medical College; Vivra Holdings, Inc.; Gambro Healthcare, Inc.; Davi-ta, Inc.; Sepracor, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 268
Pages: 343–344

Head Matter:
Robert M. DAVIDSON; Vanessa E. Komar, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. Jay GROSSMAN; Eudice Grossman; Gayle F. Petrillo; Charles Ott; Joanne C. Wray; Kent J. Thiry; Joseph C. Mello; Michael J. Meehan; Bruce R. Heurlin; Anthony P. Tartag-lia; Dva Renal Healthcare, Inc.; Albany Medical College; Vivra Holdings, Inc.; Gambro Healthcare, Inc.; Davi-ta, Inc.; Sepracor, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 07-20650
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 6, 2008.
Robert M. Davidson, pro se.
Vanessa E. Komar, pro se.
Daniel James Artz, MacDonald, Schuble & Artz, Dale Bruce Norman, Sidley Austin, Dallas, TX, Marcy E. Kurtz, Braeewell & Giuliani, Murray J. Fogler, Beck, Redden & Secrest, Brian J. Butler, Jason D. Bath, Kane Russell Coleman & Logan, Houston, TX, Paul E. Chronis, McDer-mott, Will & Emery, Chicago, IL, Sandra Palmer, Sidley Austin, Washington, DC, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before WIENER, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
AFFIRMED; all pending motions or requests by appellants are denied. See Fifth Circuit Local Rule 47.6.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.