Case Name: John F. CLAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1987-06-17
Citations: 508 So. 2d 561
Docket Number: No. 85-2931
Parties: John F. CLAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: CAMPBELL, A.C.J., LEHAN and FRANK, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 508
Pages: 561–562

Head Matter:
John F. CLAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 85-2931.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
June 17, 1987.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and A.N. Radabaugh, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corees, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals from the revocation of his probation and sentence therefor.
We affirm the revocation of probation. We find no reversible error from his contention that adequate charging documents do not appear in the record. The record reflects that he was charged with certain probation violations of which he was found guilty, and there was no objection to any failure to advise him of the charges.
However, there must be a remand for resentencing. While the trial court orally departed from the sentencing guidelines, no written reasons were provided, and the oral reasons were clearly insufficient under the case law.
Reversed and remanded for resentencing within the guidelines recommended sentencing range.
CAMPBELL, A.C.J., LEHAN and FRANK, JJ., concur.