Case Name: SWIFT & COMPANY, A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ERWIN SMIGEL, EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF JOSEPH OSCAR SMIGEL, ALSO KNOWN AS JOSEPH ASHER SMIGEL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1972-04-24
Citations: 60 N.J. 348
Docket Number: 
Parties: SWIFT & COMPANY, A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ERWIN SMIGEL, EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF JOSEPH OSCAR SMIGEL, ALSO KNOWN AS JOSEPH ASHER SMIGEL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 60
Pages: 348–348

Head Matter:
SWIFT & COMPANY, A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ERWIN SMIGEL, EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF JOSEPH OSCAR SMIGEL, ALSO KNOWN AS JOSEPH ASHER SMIGEL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Argued April 10, 1972
Decided April 24, 1972.
Mr. John J. Baldino argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Calissi, Klinger, Guccio & Baldino, attorneys).
Mr. Sidney Krieger argued the cause for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the Appellate Division opinion. (115 N. J. Super. 391).
For affirmance—Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Mountain—7.
For reversal—None.