Case Name: TERMINAL FREIGHT COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION and Terminal Freight Handling Company, Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1972-06-07
Citations: 461 F.2d 777
Docket Number: No. 18948
Parties: TERMINAL FREIGHT COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION and Terminal Freight Handling Company, Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 461
Pages: 777–779

Head Matter:
TERMINAL FREIGHT COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION and Terminal Freight Handling Company, Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.
No. 18948.
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
June 7, 1972.
John W. Pelino, Pelino, Wasserstrom & Chucas, Philadelphia, Pa. (Borovsky, Ehrlich & Kronenberg, Chicago, Ill., Morris L. Chucas, Philadelphia, Pa., Jerry Kronenberg, Chicago, Ill., on the brief), for petitioners.
Marvin Roth, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D. C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Glen M. Bendixsen, Chief of Special Litigation, Michael F. Rosenblum, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for respondent.
Present SEITZ, Chief Judge, and McLaughlin, van dusen, aldi-SERT, ADAMS, GIBBONS, MAX RO-SENN, JAMES ROSEN and HUNTER, Circuit Judges, and HANNUM, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The petition for rehearing filed by Petitioners in the above entitled case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this court, 3 Cir., 447 F.2d 1099, and to all the other available circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service, and no judge who concurred in the decision having asked for rehearing, and a majority of the circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service not having voted for rehearing by the court in banc, the petition for rehearing is denied.