Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Guadalupe MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-07-23
Citations: 515 F. App'x 639
Docket Number: No. 12-4021
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Guadalupe MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 515
Pages: 639–639

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Guadalupe MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-4021.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: July 19, 2013.
Filed: July 23, 2013.
David M. Wear, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Omaha, NE, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Guadalupe Martinez, Wilber, NE, pro se.
Nancy Kay Peterson, Lincoln, NE, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Guadalupe Martinez appeals the 46-month prison sentence imposed by the district court after he pleaded guilty to drug charges. Counsel has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and seeks leave to withdraw. For reversal, counsel argues that the sentence imposed was greater than necessary to accomplish the goals of sentencing. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that the sentence, falling at the bottom of the uncontested Guidelines range, was not substantively unreasonable. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461, 464 (8th Cir.2009) (en banc). Further, we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988). Accordingly, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw, and we affirm.
. The Honorable John M. Gerrard, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.