Case Name: SHANNON LACH v. RICHARD J. WELCH, ADMINISTRATOR (ESTATE OF MICHAEL E. WELCH)
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1999-01-19
Citations: 247 Conn. 439
Docket Number: SC 15890
Parties: SHANNON LACH v. RICHARD J. WELCH, ADMINISTRATOR (ESTATE OF MICHAEL E. WELCH)
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 247
Pages: 439–440

Head Matter:
SHANNON LACH v. RICHARD J. WELCH, ADMINISTRATOR (ESTATE OF MICHAEL E. WELCH)
(SC 15890)
Callahan, C. X, and Borden, Norcott, Katz and Palmer, Js.
Argued December 8, 1998
officially released January 19, 1999
Frederic E. Mascolo, for the appellants (defendant et al.).
James Wu, with whom was Joseph J. Fairchild, for the appellee (plaintiff).
Kenneth J. Bartschi, with whom were Susan M. Cormier, Bridget Jenkins and, on the brief, Michael McHale, legal intern, for the minor child.

Opinion:
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
After examining the record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was granted improvidently.
The appeal is dismissed.
We granted the defendants' petition for certification to appeal limited to the following issue: "Did the Appellate Court properly dismiss this appeal for lack of a final judgment?" Lack v. Welch, 244 Conn. 912, 713 A.2d 830 (1998).