Case Name: LOUIS FINKELSTEIN, RESPONDENT, v. HYMAN BRODSKY, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1933-01-05
Citations: 110 N.J.L. 13
Docket Number: 
Parties: LOUIS FINKELSTEIN, RESPONDENT, v. HYMAN BRODSKY, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 110
Pages: 13–13

Head Matter:
LOUIS FINKELSTEIN, RESPONDENT, v. HYMAN BRODSKY, APPELLANT.
Submitted October 28, 1932
Decided January 5, 1933.
For the respondent, Lichtenstein, Schwartz & Friedenberg.
For the appellant, Stuhr & Vogt.

Opinion:
Pee Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Circuit Court Judge Ackerson, to whom the case was referred and whose opinion is printed in 10 N. J. Mis. R. 55.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Teen-chard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Brogan, Heher, Yan Buskiek, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 16.
For reversal — None.