Case Name: Harry Alfonso THAMES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2009-02-18
Citations: 2 So. 3d 1098
Docket Number: No. 3D07-2115
Parties: Harry Alfonso THAMES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SHEPHERD and SALTER, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 2
Pages: 1098–1100

Head Matter:
Harry Alfonso THAMES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D07-2115.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 18, 2009.
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Jessica Zagier and Andrew Stanton, Assistant Public Defenders, for appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Timothy R.M. Thomas, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SHEPHERD and SALTER, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
There was no founded suspicion, much less probable cause of wrongdoing to justify the search and seizure involved in this case. See Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); Popple v. State, 626 So.2d 185 (Fla.1993); J.L.H. v. State, 990 So.2d 686 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008); Alvarez v. City of Hialeah, 900 So.2d 761 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); State v. Taylor, 826 So.2d 399 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). Because the order denying the defendant's motion to suppress was therefore erroneous, the conviction is reversed and the cause remanded with direction to discharge the defendant.