Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Appellant, v. LEROY DEDRICK, Respondent; STATE OF OREGON, Appellant, v. GARRY DEHN OWINGS, Respondent; STATE OF OREGON, Appellant, v. DAVID ALLEN DAVIS, Respondent; STATE OF OREGON, Appellant, v. CHERI RAE GARCIA, Respondent; STATE OF OREGON, Appellant, v. PANCHO CARRANZA-LOPEZ, Respondent; STATE OF OREGON, Appellant, v. LEONARDO M. VERDUCZO, Respondent; STATE OF OREGON, Appellant, v. MIREGEA CONSTANTIN JIGA, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1991-06-19
Citations: 107 Or. App. 776
Docket Number: (C90-05-33137; CA A66785; C90-05-32705; CA A66786; C90-05-33222; CA A66787; C90-05-33064; CA A66788; C90-06-33726; CA A66789; C90-06-33474; CA A66790; C90-06-33831; CA A66791
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Appellant, v. LEROY DEDRICK, Respondent. STATE OF OREGON, Appellant, v. GARRY DEHN OWINGS, Respondent. STATE OF OREGON, Appellant, v. DAVID ALLEN DAVIS, Respondent. STATE OF OREGON, Appellant, v. CHERI RAE GARCIA, Respondent. STATE OF OREGON, Appellant, v. PANCHO CARRANZA-LOPEZ, Respondent. STATE OF OREGON, Appellant, v. LEONARDO M. VERDUCZO, Respondent. STATE OF OREGON, Appellant, v. MIREGEA CONSTANTIN JIGA, Respondent.
Judges: Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Newman and Deits, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 107
Pages: 776–777

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted December 10, 1990,
affirmed June 19,
reconsideration denied August 21,
petition for review denied September 24, 1991 (312 Or 151)
STATE OF OREGON, Appellant, v. LEROY DEDRICK, Respondent. STATE OF OREGON, Appellant, v. GARRY DEHN OWINGS, Respondent. STATE OF OREGON, Appellant, v. DAVID ALLEN DAVIS, Respondent. STATE OF OREGON, Appellant, v. CHERI RAE GARCIA, Respondent. STATE OF OREGON, Appellant, v. PANCHO CARRANZA-LOPEZ, Respondent. STATE OF OREGON, Appellant, v. LEONARDO M. VERDUCZO, Respondent. STATE OF OREGON, Appellant, v. MIREGEA CONSTANTIN JIGA, Respondent.
(C90-05-33137; CA A66785 (Control))
(C90-05-32705; CA A66786)
(C90-05-33222; CA A66787)
(C90-05-33064; CA A66788)
(C90-06-33726; CA A66789)
(C90-06-33474; CA A66790)
(C90-06-33831; CA A66791)
(Cases Consolidated)
811 P2d 926
Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Richard D. Wasserman, Assistant Attorney General, Salem.
Gail Meyer, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents.
Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Newman and Deits, Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Affirmed. State v. Moeller, 105 Or App 434, 806 P2d 130, rev allowed 311 Or 349 (1991).