Case Name: David A. Kerr et al., Appellants, v. Jo Ann Dunham, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1994-02-04
Citations: 201 A.D.2d 936
Docket Number: 
Parties: David A. Kerr et al., Appellants, v Jo Ann Dunham, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 201
Pages: 936–936

Head Matter:
David A. Kerr et al., Appellants, v Jo Ann Dunham, Respondent.
[610 NYS2d 905]

Opinion:
Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs, motion denied and cross motion granted. Memorandum: Defendant failed to demonstrate special, unusual and extraordinary circumstances sufficient to authorize Supreme Court to permit defendant to conduct a physical examination of the injured plaintiff David A. Kerr more than five months after filing of the note of issue and statement of readiness (see, Laudico v Sears, Roebuck & Co., 125 AD2d 960; Levine v McFarland, 98 AD2d 795, 796). Under the circumstances, Supreme Court should have denied defendant's motion and should have granted plaintiffs' cross motion for a protective order. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolf, Jr., J. — Discovery.) Present — Pine, J. P., Balio, Fallon, Doerr and Davis, JJ.