Case Name: Sam HOYT, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CITY OF ARNOLD, The Personnel Board of Review of the City of Arnold, Brenda Zimmermann, Glennon Portell, and Connie Doty, Defendants/Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-01-13
Citations: 125 S.W.3d 353
Docket Number: No. ED 82633
Parties: Sam HOYT, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CITY OF ARNOLD, The Personnel Board of Review of the City of Arnold, Brenda Zimmermann, Glennon Portell, and Connie Doty, Defendants/Respondents.
Judges: Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and MARY K. HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 125
Pages: 353–354

Head Matter:
Sam HOYT, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CITY OF ARNOLD, The Personnel Board of Review of the City of Arnold, Brenda Zimmermann, Glennon Portell, and Connie Doty, Defendants/Respondents.
No. ED 82633.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Jan. 13, 2004.
Timothy K Kellett, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Michael D. Hart, St. Louis, MO, for respondents.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and MARY K. HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff, Sam Hoyt, appeals from a judgment affirming the decision of the Personnel Board of Review of the City of Arnold sustaining his termination.
The decision of the Personnel Board is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).