Case Name: Maureen I. ROSGA, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Maurice N. ROSGA, Respondent/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1992-04-07
Citations: 829 S.W.2d 58
Docket Number: No. 60014
Parties: Maureen I. ROSGA, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Maurice N. ROSGA, Respondent/Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 829
Pages: 58–59

Head Matter:
Maureen I. ROSGA, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Maurice N. ROSGA, Respondent/Appellant.
No. 60014.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
April 7, 1992.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 19, 1992.
Richard Alan Cooper, Danis, Reed, Murphy Garvin, Tobben & Schreiber, Clayton, for respondent, appellant.
Maureen I. Rosga, pro se.
Alan Agathen, Boisaubin & Agathen, Clayton, for petitioner, respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Husband appeals from the provision of a dissolution decree dividing the marital property. We affirm. The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evi dence, no error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only setting forth our reasons for affirming the trial court's judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).