Case Name: Antonio SAUNDERS, a/k/a Antonio Jerome Saunders-El, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Circuit Court Judge FISHER, in his/her individual and official capacity; Circuit Court Judge Vincent Conway, in his individual and official capacity; Efrain Segarra, Doctor, in his/her individual and official capacity; James Ellenson, Attorney, in his individual and official capacity, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-08-31
Citations: 393 F. App'x 119
Docket Number: No. 10-6608
Parties: Antonio SAUNDERS, a/k/a Antonio Jerome Saunders-El, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Circuit Court Judge FISHER, in his/her individual and official capacity; Circuit Court Judge Vincent Conway, in his individual and official capacity; Efrain Segarra, Doctor, in his/her individual and official capacity; James Ellenson, Attorney, in his individual and official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 393
Pages: 119–120

Head Matter:
Antonio SAUNDERS, a/k/a Antonio Jerome Saunders-El, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Circuit Court Judge FISHER, in his/her individual and official capacity; Circuit Court Judge Vincent Conway, in his individual and official capacity; Efrain Segarra, Doctor, in his/her individual and official capacity; James Ellenson, Attorney, in his individual and official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 10-6608.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 17, 2010.
Decided: Aug. 31, 2010.
Antonio Saunders, Appellant Pro Se.
Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Antonio Saunders appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Saunders v. Circuit Court Judge Fisher, No. 1:10-cv-00264LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. filed March 23, 2010; entered March 24, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.