Case Name: Arkansas & Louisiana Missouri Railway Co. et al. v. Amarillo-Borger Express, Inc., et al.; and United States et al. v. Amarillo-Borger Express, Inc., et al.
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1956-10-08
Citations: 352 U.S. 817
Docket Number: No. 125; No. 224
Parties: Arkansas & Louisiana Missouri Railway Co. et al. v. Amarillo-Borger Express, Inc., et al.; and United States et al. v. Amarillo-Borger Express, Inc., et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 352
Pages: 817–817

Head Matter:
No. 125.
No. 224.
Arkansas & Louisiana Missouri Railway Co. et al. v. Amarillo-Borger Express, Inc., et al.; and United States et al. v. Amarillo-Borger Express, Inc., et al.
J. T. Suggs for the Arkansas & Louisiana Missouri Railway Co. et al., appellants in No. 125. Simon E. Sobeloff, then Solicitor General, Assistant Attorney General Barnes, Robert W. Ginnane and H. Neil Garson for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellants in No. 224.

Opinion:
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Probable jurisdiction noted.
Reported below: 138 F. Supp. 411.