Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DONALD HALE DARNELL, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2006-12-13
Citations: 209 Or. App. 805
Docket Number: 0307-33651; A124738
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DONALD HALE DARNELL, Appellant.
Judges: Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Schuman and Ortega, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 209
Pages: 805–806

Head Matter:
Submitted on record and briefs November 3,
sentences vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed December 13, 2006
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DONALD HALE DARNELL, Appellant.
0307-33651; A124738
149 P3d 330
Peter A. Ozanne, Executive Director, Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, Legal Services Division, and Anne Fujita Munsey, Senior Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Elizabeth A. Gordon, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Schuman and Ortega, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for felony assault in the fourth degree, ORS 163.160, assault in the third degree with a firearm, ORS 163.165, and assault in the fourth degree, ORS 163.160. His sole contention on appeal is that the trial court erred in ordering him to pay a compensatory fine for injuries that resulted from a charged crime that had been dismissed and for which he had not been convicted. The state concedes the point and suggests that the case should be remanded to the trial court for the purposes of resentencing. See State v. Donahue, 165 Or App 143, 146, 995 P2d 1202 (2000) ("[T]he legislature has required that we remand for purposes of resentencing rather than merely vacate a portion of the sentence."). We accept the concession and agree that the case should be remanded.
Sentences vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.