Case Name: IN RE: Robert Geoffrey BRODERICK, Respondent
Court: District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Decision Date: 2016-09-01
Citations: 146 A.3d 116
Docket Number: No. 16-BG-581
Parties: IN RE: Robert Geoffrey BRODERICK, Respondent.
Judges: BEFORE: Thompson, Associate Judge, and Newman and Pryor, Senior Judges.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 146
Pages: 116–117

Head Matter:
IN RE: Robert Geoffrey BRODERICK, Respondent.
Bar Registration No. 1004403
No. 16-BG-581
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Filed September 1, 2016
DDN: 133-16
BEFORE: Thompson, Associate Judge, and Newman and Pryor, Senior Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
On consideration of the certified order suspending respondent from the practice of law in the state of Connecticut for a period of one year, this court's July 7, 2016, order directing respondent to show cause why the functionally-equivalent reciprocal discipline of a one-year suspension with a fitness requirement should not be imposed, the statement of Disciplinary Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that no response was filed to this court's show cause order but that respondent filed his D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g) affidavit August 7, 2016, it is
ORDERED that Robert Geoffrey Bro-derick is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a period of one year, nunc pro tunc to August 7, 2016, with reinstatement condi tioned on a showing of fitness. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C.2010), and In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007) (re-buttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate).