Case Name: Leah EVERHART, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Appellant, v. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2012-06-28
Citations: 90 So. 3d 374
Docket Number: No. 1D11-4532
Parties: Leah EVERHART, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Appellant, v. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, Appellee.
Judges: BENTON, C.J., and CLARK, J., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 90
Pages: 374–375

Head Matter:
Leah EVERHART, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Appellant, v. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, Appellee.
No. 1D11-4532.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
June 28, 2012.
David S. Farber of the Law Office of David S. Farber, P.A., Coral Gables; Daniel B. Rogers and Alfred J. Saikali of
Shook, Hardy & Bacon, LLP, Miami, for Appellant.
Gina G. Smith of Butler, Pappas, Weih-muller, Katz, Craig, LLP, Tallahassee; Farrokh Jhabvala and Ari H. Gerstin of Jorden & Burt, LLP, Miami, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Ceballo v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp., 967 So.2d 811, 815 (Fla. 2007) (holding that proof of entitlement to the face value of the policy "does not affect [the insured's] obligation to show that [she has] incurred an additional loss in order to recover under the supplemental [law and ordinance] coverage"). See also K.R. Exch. Servs., Inc. v. Fuerst, Humphrey, Ittleman, PL, 48 So.3d 889, 894 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) ("It is well settled that the court must consider an exhibit attached to the complaint together with the complaint's allegations, and that the exhibit controls when its language is inconsistent with the complaint's allegations."); Magnum Capital, LLC v. Carter & Assocs., LLC, 905 So.2d 220, 221 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).
BENTON, C.J., and CLARK, J., concur.
MAKAR, J., Specially Concurs with Opinion.