Case Name: SWING v. SWING et
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1925-11-30
Citations: 4 Ohio Law Abs. 283
Docket Number: No. 2700
Parties: SWING v. SWING et
Judges: 
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 4
Pages: 283–283

Head Matter:
SWING v. SWING et
Ohio Appeals, 1st Dist., Hamilton Co.
No. 2700.
Decided Nov. 30, 1925
Attorneys — Jones & Pfau, Cincinnati, for Loan Co.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
The action in Hamilton Common Pleas was for partition. The Miami Savings & Loan Co. filed an answer and cross petition, praying for judgment.
Partition was abondoned, and judgment entered foreclosing the mortgage of the Savings & Loan Co. but not permitting assessing the attorneys fees. Error was prosecuted from this judgment, and the Court of Appeals held:
A court is not authorized to allow fees to counsel for a mortgage when the property is sold in foreclosure.-
Judgment affirmed.