Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lenin Paul SALAZAR-MONTOYA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-11-20
Citations: 254 F. App'x 676
Docket Number: No. 07-10075
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Lenin Paul SALAZAR-MONTOYA, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: B. FLETCHER, WARDLAW, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 254
Pages: 676–677

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Lenin Paul SALAZAR-MONTOYA, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 07-10075.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 22, 2007.
Filed Nov. 20, 2007.
Cynthia R. Wood, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Evo A. Deconcini U.S. Courthouse, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Harriette P. Levitt, Esq., Law Offices of Harriette P. Levitt, Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: B. FLETCHER, WARDLAW, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Lenin Paul Salazar-Montoya appeals from his 24-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(C). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
To the extent Salazar-Montoya contends the district court miscalculated his criminal history score, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion. See United States v. Cantrell, 433 F.3d 1269, 1279-80 (9th Cir.2006). To the extent Salazar-Montoya contends the district court should have reduced his criminal history score as overrated, we cannot say the sentence was unreasonable. See United States v. Mohamed, 459 F.3d 979, 988-89 (9th Cir.2006).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.