Case Name: THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. Arthur G. BRODSKY, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1983-05-26
Citations: 433 So. 2d 517
Docket Number: No. 63422
Parties: THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. Arthur G. BRODSKY, Respondent.
Judges: ADKINS, Acting C.J., and BOYD, OVERTON, McDonald and EHRLICH, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 433
Pages: 517–518

Head Matter:
THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. Arthur G. BRODSKY, Respondent.
No. 63422.
Supreme Court of Florida.
May 26, 1983.
John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director and Stanley A. Spring, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, and Richard B. Liss, Bar/Counsel, Miami, for complainant.
Arthur G. Brodsky, in pro. per.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This matter is before the Court on Petition for Approval of Conditional Guilty Plea for Consent Judgment and Entry of Final Order of Discipline to violations of Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(1), (4), & (6), 6-101(A)(3), 7-101(A)(2) and 7-101(A)(3) of the Code of Professional Responsibility and article XI, Rules 11.02(2) and 11.02(3)(a) of the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar. We approve the Petition, and we hereby suspend respondent, Arthur G. Brodsky, from the practice of law for a period of three (3) months effective June 27, 1983, thereby giving respondent thirty (30) days to close out his practice and take the necessary steps to protect his clients. Also, it is ordered that respondent shall not accept any new business.
Costs in the amount of $300.00 are hereby taxed against the respondent.
It is so ordered.
ADKINS, Acting C.J., and BOYD, OVERTON, McDonald and EHRLICH, JJ., concur.