Case Name: Muhammad Abd Saleem EURY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Alan MORRIS; Paul Cummings; Kesha Fowlkes; James Keeling; Daniel Braxton, Warden; Robert R. Doumar, Judge, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-09-05
Citations: 18 F. App'x 84
Docket Number: No. 01-7140
Parties: Muhammad Abd Saleem EURY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Alan MORRIS; Paul Cummings; Kesha Fowlkes; James Keeling; Daniel Braxton, Warden; Robert R. Doumar, Judge, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 18
Pages: 84–84

Head Matter:
Muhammad Abd Saleem EURY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Alan MORRIS; Paul Cummings; Kesha Fowlkes; James Keeling; Daniel Braxton, Warden; Robert R. Doumar, Judge, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 01-7140.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 23, 2001.
Decided Sept. 5, 2001.
Muhammad Abd Saleem Eury, pro se.
Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Muhammad Abd Saleem Eury appeals the district court's order denying relief on his civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Eury v. Morris, No. CA-01-436-2 (E.D.Va. July 3, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.