Case Name: E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, Petitioner, v. In re 1997 AND 1998 CLAIMS OF ECUADORIAN SHRIMP FARMERS, Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2003-12-10
Citations: 860 So. 2d 529
Docket Number: No. 4D03-3048
Parties: E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, Petitioner, v. In re 1997 AND 1998 CLAIMS OF ECUADORIAN SHRIMP FARMERS, Respondent.
Judges: GUNTHER, POLEN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 860
Pages: 529–529

Head Matter:
E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, Petitioner, v. In re 1997 AND 1998 CLAIMS OF ECUADORIAN SHRIMP FARMERS, Respondent.
No. 4D03-3048.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Dec. 10, 2003.
Jane Kreusler-Walsh, Rebecca Mercier-Vargas of Jane Kreusler-Walsh, P.A., West Palm Beach; Daniel F. Molony of Shook, Hardy & Bacon, L.L.P., Tampa; Thomas M. Sherouse of Shook, Hardy & Bacon, L.L.P., Miami; for petitioner.
Walter G. Campbell, Jr., Robert McKee, Ivan Cabrera of Krupniek, Campbell, Malone, Roselli, Buser, Slama, Hancock & McKee; Bruce Rogow and Beverly A. Pohl of Bruce S. Rogow, P.A., Fort Lauderdale; for respondent.

Opinion:
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC
PER CURIAM.
We deny petitioner's motion for rehearing and rehearing en banc but issue the following revised opinion in lieu of our slip opinion issued on October 8, 2003:
Although we find the affidavit in support of prohibition signed by petitioner's in-house counsel, Ms. Kittredge, meets the requirements of Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.160(c) in this case , we deny the petition as the motion for disqualification was legally insufficient.
GUNTHER, POLEN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Parsons, 644 So.2d 340 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).