Case Name: Steve Monick, Appellant, v. City of New York, Defendant; Max Lesin, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1975-09-29
Citations: 49 A.D.2d 768
Docket Number: 
Parties: Steve Monick, Appellant, v City of New York, Defendant; Max Lesin, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 49
Pages: 768–768

Head Matter:
Steve Monick, Appellant, v City of New York, Defendant; Max Lesin, Respondent.

Opinion:
Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated January 3, 1975, affirmed, without costs. Under all of the circumstances in the record we cannot say that Special Term abused its discretion in granting respondent's motion for leave to serve an amended answer to plaintiffs complaint setting up the fellow-servant rule as a defense. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Latham, Margett, Brennan and Shapiro, JJ., concur.