Case Name: Village of New London v. Starbird
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1925-04-21
Citations: 112 Ohio St. 564
Docket Number: No. 18621
Parties: Village of New London v. Starbird.
Judges: Jones, Matthias and Day, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, New Service
Volume: 112
Pages: 564–565

Head Matter:
Village of New London v. Starbird.
(No. 18621
Decided April 21, 1925.)
Mr. G. Ray Craig and Messrs. Young & Young, for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. Rowley & Carpenter, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
By the Court.
In the foregoing case Jones, Matthias and Day, JJ., reach the conclusion that no prejudicial error has intervened and that the judgment of the court below should be affirmed.
Marshall, C. J., and Allen and Robinson, JJ., are of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed.
Kinkade, J., having been a member of the Court of Appeals that heard and decided this case, and whose record is now before this court for consideration, does not participate herein.
For the foregoing reasons, there not being four judges that have reached a common conclusion, it follows that, there not being a majority of the court in favor of reversal, the judgment of the Court of Appeals stands affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Jones, Matthias and Day, JJ., concur.
Kinkade, J., not participating.