Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julio PICCINONNA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1988-11-28
Citations: 861 F.2d 639
Docket Number: No. 86-5335
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julio PICCINONNA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before RONEY, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK, EDMONDSON and COX, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 861
Pages: 639–639

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julio PICCINONNA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 86-5335.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Nov. 28, 1988.
James W. McDonald, Jr., McDonald & Erickson, P.A., Homestead, Fla., for defendant-appellant.
Dexter W. Lethinen, U.S. Atty., Caroline Heck, Asst. U.S. Atty., Miami, Fla., John J. Powers, III, Dept, of Justice, Main, Appellate Section, Laura Heiser, Washington, D.C., James Griffin, U.S. Dept, of Justice, Anti Trust Div., Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellee.

Opinion:
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING IN BANC
(Opinion August 28, 1988, 11th Cir., 1988, 858 F.2d 743).
Before RONEY, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK, EDMONDSON and COX, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing in banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing in banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court in banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of in banc briefs. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.