Case Name: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Thomas M. REED, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2017-08-22
Citations: 168 A.3d 132
Docket Number: No. 10 WAP 2016
Parties: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Thomas M. REED, Appellant
Judges: Chief Justice Saylor files a concurring statement.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 168
Pages: 132–134

Head Matter:
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Thomas M. REED, Appellant
No. 10 WAP 2016
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
ARGUED: March 7, 2017
August 22, 2017
Philip Gelso, Esq., for PA Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Amicus Curiae.
Kevin Francis McCarthy, Esq., Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office, for Pa. District Attorney’s Association, Amicus Curiae.
Samuel C. Stretton, Esq., for Reed, Thomas M., Appellant.
William Joseph Conyngham, Esq., Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Fi-gel, P.L.L.C., for Collateral Consequences Resource Center, Appellant Amicus Curiae.
John Jacob Hare, Esq., Marshall, Den-nehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin, P.C., for Social Science Scholars, Appellant Ami-cus Curiae.
Jason A. Leckerman, Esq., Ballard Spahr LLP, for Assoc, for Treatment of Sexual Abusers, etc. and Joseph J. Peters Inst., Appellant Amicus Curiae.
Aaron Joshua Marcus, Esq., Defender Association of Philadelphia, for Defender Association of Philadelphia, Appellant Amicus Curiae,
Ryan James Dobo, Esq., Clearfield County District Attorney’s Office, for Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Appellee.
William A. Shaw Jr., Esq., for Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Appellee.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 22nd day of August, 2017, the decision of the Superior Court is REVERSED. See Commonwealth v. Muniz, — Pa. —, 164 A.3d 1189, 2017 WL 3173066 (2017).
Chief Justice Saylor files a concurring statement.
Justice Mundy files a concurring statement,