Case Name: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Holzer
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1998-06-03
Citations: 82 Ohio St. 3d 1216
Docket Number: No. 96-1965
Parties: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Holzer.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 82
Pages: 1216–1216

Head Matter:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Holzer.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Holzer (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 1216.]
(No. 96-1965
Submitted and decided June 3, 1998.)

Opinion:
On Application for Reinstatement.
This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent Richard Jean Holzer, Attorney Registration No. 0018814, last known address in Englewood, Ohio.
The court coming now to consider its order of April 30,1997, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of one year, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that Richard Jean Holzer be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified cost of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.
For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Holzer (1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 309, 677 N.E.2d 1186.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.