Case Name: Otto Lowy, respondent, v. William V. McMenimen, defendant, and Lowy Laboratory, incorporated, a corporation, appellant
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1923-05-10
Citations: 94 N.J. Eq. 800
Docket Number: 
Parties: Otto Lowy, respondent, v. William V. McMenimen, defendant, and Lowy Laboratory, incorporated, a corporation, appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 94
Pages: 800–800

Head Matter:
Otto Lowy, respondent, v. William V. McMenimen, defendant, and Lowy Laboratory, incorporated, a corporation, appellant.
[Decided May 10th, 1923.]
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Baches, whose opinion is reported in 94 N. J. Eq. 75.
For the appellant, Gaede & Gaede.
For the respondent, Frank E. Bradner.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Baches.
For affirmance—The Chiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Black, Katzenbach, White, PIeppeni-ieimer, Gardner, Van Buskirk—9.
For reversal—Parker, Bergen,. Kalis ch—3.