Case Name: Sheipline et al., Appellants, v. Like, Appellee
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1986-12-22
Citations: 28 Ohio St. 3d 308
Docket Number: No. 86-4
Parties: Sheipline et al., Appellants, v. Like, Appellee.
Judges: Celebrezze, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, C. Brown and Douglas, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 28
Pages: 308–308

Head Matter:
Sheipline et al., Appellants, v. Like, Appellee.
[Cite as Sheipline v. Like (1986), 28 Ohio St. 3d 308.]
No. 86-4
Decided December 22, 1986.
Williams, Jilek & Lafferty Co., L.P.A., Martin W. Williams and Drew R. Masse, for appellants.
Gooding, Evans & Huffman, Lawrence S. Huffman and Matthew C. Huffman, for appellee.

Opinion:
The judgment of the court of appeals in case No. 1-84-38, pursuant to appellants' Proposition of Law No. 1 with respect to the issue of due process, is hereby reversed on authority of Mominee v. Scherbarth (1986), 28 Ohio St. 3d 270, and the cause is remanded to the trial court.
Celebrezze, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, C. Brown and Douglas, JJ., concur.
Holmes and Wright, JJ., dissent.