Case Name: Lora LOHR, Michael Lohr, Her Husband, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MEDTRONIC, INC., a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1996-10-28
Citations: 98 F.3d 618
Docket Number: No. 94-2516
Parties: Lora LOHR, Michael Lohr, Her Husband, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MEDTRONIC, INC., a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before BLACK and BARKETT, Circuit Judges, and RONEY, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 98
Pages: 618–618

Head Matter:
Lora LOHR, Michael Lohr, Her Husband, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MEDTRONIC, INC., a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 94-2516.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Oct. 28, 1996.
Daniel C. Shaughnessy, Cowles & Shaugh-nessy, PA., Jacksonville, FL, Robert F. Spohrer, Spohrer, Wilner & Maxwell, PA, Jacksonville, FL, Brian Wolfman, Public Citizen Litigation Group, Washington, DC, for plaintiffs-appellants.
Dennis P. Waggoner, Hill, Ward & Henderson, P.A., Tampa, FL, Marcus R. Magnuson, Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, Daniel G. Jareho, McKenna & Cuneo, Washington, DC, for defendant-appellee.

Opinion:
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Before BLACK and BARKETT, Circuit Judges, and RONEY, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
On June 26, 1996, the Supreme Court reversed this panel's opinion in Lohr v. Medtronic, Inc., 56 F.3d 1335 (11th Cir.1995). See Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr, — U.S.-, 116 S.Ct. 2240, 135 L.Ed.2d 700 (1996). Pursuant to the Supreme Court's opinion, we now reverse the district court's dismissal of plaintiffs complaint and remand the ease to the district court for further proceedings not inconsistent with the Supreme Court's opinion.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.