Case Name: Betty Albert HOOVER v. Rodney E. HOOVER
Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1975-05-13
Citations: 313 So. 2d 364
Docket Number: No. 6424
Parties: Betty Albert HOOVER v. Rodney E. HOOVER.
Judges: Before SCHOTT, MORIAL and BEER, JJ-
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 313
Pages: 364–364

Head Matter:
Betty Albert HOOVER v. Rodney E. HOOVER.
No. 6424.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.
May 13, 1975.
Frank J. D’Amico, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellant.
Cecil M. Burglass, Jr., New Orleans, for defendant-appellee.
Before SCHOTT, MORIAL and BEER, JJ-

Opinion:
SCHOTT, Judge.
Plaintiff originally sued defendant Hoover on the $33,000 note at a time when she was his wife, as discussed in our opinion in Suit No. 6423, 313 So.2d 358, decided by us on this date. Her original suit was dismissed on exception of no right of action and after she obtained a judicial separation from bed and board from defendant she instituted this suit which was then consolidated for trial with the first suit. The judgment in her favor against defendant for the full amount of the note plus interest, attorneys' fees and court costs, was not appealed from by anyone and is therefore final. Plaintiff is to pay the cost of this appeal.
Affirmed.