Case Name: ISRAEL PAGAN ESTATE and Leonor C. Pagan, Personal Representative, Plaintiffs and Petitioners, v. CAPITOL THRIFT AND LOAN, a financial corporation, Joseph N. Cannon, Dorius Black, Alpha Leasing Company, a partnership; Robert D. Apgood, Joseph N. Cannon, Dorius Black, and Richard McKean, doing business under the name and style of Alpha Leasing Company, Bill Brown Realty, Inc., Scott Peatross, personally, Stewart Title Company of Utah, Tommy W. Sisk and Merlyn Hanks, Defendants and Respondents
Court: Utah Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Utah
Decision Date: 1989-03-17
Citations: 771 P.2d 1032
Docket Number: No. 870503
Parties: ISRAEL PAGAN ESTATE and Leonor C. Pagan, Personal Representative, Plaintiffs and Petitioners, v. CAPITOL THRIFT AND LOAN, a financial corporation, Joseph N. Cannon, Dorius Black, Alpha Leasing Company, a partnership; Robert D. Apgood, Joseph N. Cannon, Dorius Black, and Richard McKean, doing business under the name and style of Alpha Leasing Company, Bill Brown Realty, Inc., Scott Peatross, personally, Stewart Title Company of Utah, Tommy W. Sisk and Merlyn Hanks, Defendants and Respondents.
Judges: HALL, C.J., and DURHAM and ZIMMERMAN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Pacific Reporter 2d
Volume: 771
Pages: 1032–1033

Head Matter:
ISRAEL PAGAN ESTATE and Leonor C. Pagan, Personal Representative, Plaintiffs and Petitioners, v. CAPITOL THRIFT AND LOAN, a financial corporation, Joseph N. Cannon, Dorius Black, Alpha Leasing Company, a partnership; Robert D. Apgood, Joseph N. Cannon, Dorius Black, and Richard McKean, doing business under the name and style of Alpha Leasing Company, Bill Brown Realty, Inc., Scott Peatross, personally, Stewart Title Company of Utah, Tommy W. Sisk and Merlyn Hanks, Defendants and Respondents.
No. 870503.
Supreme Court of Utah.
March 17, 1989.
Mark S. Miner, Salt Lake City, for plaintiffs and petitioners.
Kay M. Lewis, Kevin V. Olsen, Mel S. ' Martin, and Bruce H. Shapiro, Salt Lake City, for defendants and respondents.

Opinion:
STEWART, Justice:
This Court granted the petition for a writ of certiorari in this case on February 23, 1988. We have heard oral arguments and studied the briefs and record, and it now appears that certiorari was improvidently granted. The case is, therefore, dismissed.
HALL, C.J., and DURHAM and ZIMMERMAN, JJ., concur.