Case Name: OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, a foreign corporation authorized to do business in the State of Florida, Appellant, v. Nadine E. BRUCE and Clarence N. Bruce, husband and wife, Appellees; OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, a foreign corporation authorized to do business in the State of Florida, Appellant, v. Mary McLAY, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1971-08-09
Citations: 251 So. 2d 141
Docket Number: Nos. 71-128, 71-129
Parties: OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, a foreign corporation authorized to do business in the State of Florida, Appellant, v. Nadine E. BRUCE and Clarence N. Bruce, husband and wife, Appellees. OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, a foreign corporation authorized to do business in the State of Florida, Appellant, v. Mary McLAY, Appellee.
Judges: WALDEN, CROSS and OWEN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 251
Pages: 141–141

Head Matter:
OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, a foreign corporation authorized to do business in the State of Florida, Appellant, v. Nadine E. BRUCE and Clarence N. Bruce, husband and wife, Appellees. OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, a foreign corporation authorized to do business in the State of Florida, Appellant, v. Mary McLAY, Appellee.
Nos. 71-128, 71-129.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Aug. 9, 1971.
Gary L. Stump, of Whittaker, Pyle & Stump, Orlando, for appellant.
Thomas M. Woodruff, of Whitaker & Koepke & Associates, Orlando, for appel-lees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Upon examining the record-on-appeal and the arguments presented to us, we hold the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur was properly before the jury. Yarbrough v. Ball U-Drive System, Inc., Fla.1950, 48 So.2d 82; Holman v. Ford Motor Company, Fla.App.1970, 239 So.2d 40; Enslein v. Hudson & Manhattan Railroad Company, 1957, 8 Misc.2d 87, 165 N.Y.S.2d 630 and Domany v. Otis Elevator Company, 6th C.A. 1966, 369 F.2d 604, cert. den. at 387 U.S. 942, 87 S.Ct. 2073, 18 L.Ed.2d 1327.
Affirmed.
WALDEN, CROSS and OWEN, JJ., concur.