Case Name: Rose M. BALLARD and Alana Newton, Individually and as Co-Personal Representatives for the Estate of Jimmy Ballard, Deceased, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TULSA PAIN CONSULTANTS, P.C., Defendant-Appellee, and Johnson & Johnson, a/k/a Johnson & Johnson, Inc., a/k/a Johnson & Johnson Company Janssen Pharmaceutica Productions, LP, Alxa Corporation, Kathy's Pharmacy & Gifts and John Doe Defendants 1, 2, 3 and 4, Defendants
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 2013-06-27
Citations: 304 P.3d 746
Docket Number: No. 110,835
Parties: Rose M. BALLARD and Alana Newton, Individually and as Co-Personal Representatives for the Estate of Jimmy Ballard, Deceased, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TULSA PAIN CONSULTANTS, P.C., Defendant-Appellee, and Johnson & Johnson, a/k/a Johnson & Johnson, Inc., a/k/a Johnson & Johnson Company Janssen Pharmaceutica Productions, LP, Alxa Corporation, Kathy's Pharmacy & Gifts and John Doe Defendants 1, 2, 3 and 4, Defendants.
Judges: COLBERT, C.J., REIF, V.C.J., WATT, EDMONDSON, GURICH, JJ., coneur.
Reporter: Pacific Reporter 3d
Volume: 304
Pages: 746–747

Head Matter:
2013 OK 61
Rose M. BALLARD and Alana Newton, Individually and as Co-Personal Representatives for the Estate of Jimmy Ballard, Deceased, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TULSA PAIN CONSULTANTS, P.C., Defendant-Appellee, and Johnson & Johnson, a/k/a Johnson & Johnson, Inc., a/k/a Johnson & Johnson Company Janssen Pharmaceutica Productions, LP, Alxa Corporation, Kathy's Pharmacy & Gifts and John Doe Defendants 1, 2, 3 and 4, Defendants.
No. 110,835.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
June 27, 2013.

Opinion:
ORDER OF SUMMARY DISPOSITION
11 Rule 1.201 of the Oklahoma Supreme Court Rules provides that "[in any case in which it appears that a prior controlling appellate decision is dispositive of the appeal, the court may summarily affirm or reverse, citing in its order of summary disposition this rule and the controlling decision." Okla. S.Ct. Rule 1.201.
2 After reviewing the record in this case, THE COURT FINDS that our recent decisions in Wall v. Marouk, 2018 OK 36, 302 P.3d 775 and Douglas v. Cox Retirement Props., 2013 OK 37, 302 P.3d 789, dispose of the issues in this case.
13 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the trial court's dismissal of this case is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.
COLBERT, C.J., REIF, V.C.J., WATT, EDMONDSON, GURICH, JJ., coneur.
WINCHESTER & TAYLOR, JJ., dissent.
KAUGER, J., not participating.
COMBS, J., disqualified.