Case Name: James E. Clark vs. Joseph T. Whittlesey
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1900-06-19
Citations: 72 Conn. 734
Docket Number: 
Parties: James E. Clark vs. Joseph T. Whittlesey.
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 72
Pages: 734–734

Head Matter:
James E. Clark vs. Joseph T. Whittlesey.
Third Judicial District.
Argued June 14th
decided June 19th, 1900.
Actioh to recover for services as a broker, brought to the Court of Common Pleas in New Haven County and tried to court, Bishop, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the defendant, and appeal by the plaintiff for alleged errors in the rulings of the court.
No error.
'William S. My and James J. Buchanan, for the appellant (plaintiff).
James P. Pigott, for the appellee (defendant).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
There is no question of law presented by the record. The finding does not state ultimate facts at all. Evidential facts only are recited; and as the trial court has decided the issue in favor of the defendant this court is concluded thereby.