Case Name: Roland K. SCHAEFER, Appellant, v. WESTERN SURETY COMPANY, d/b/a CNA Surety, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2008-11-18
Citations: 278 S.W.3d 201
Docket Number: No. ED 91347
Parties: Roland K. SCHAEFER, Appellant, v. WESTERN SURETY COMPANY, d/b/a CNA Surety, Respondent.
Judges: Before KURT S. ODENWALD, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 278
Pages: 201–201

Head Matter:
Roland K. SCHAEFER, Appellant, v. WESTERN SURETY COMPANY, d/b/a CNA Surety, Respondent.
No. ED 91347.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Nov. 18, 2008.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Dec. 29, 2008.
Application for Transfer Denied Jan. 27, 2009.
Roland K. Schaefer, St. Louis, pro se.
William Sitzer, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before KURT S. ODENWALD, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Roland K. Schaefer appeals from the trial court's judgment dismissing his cause of action against Western Surety Company on the grounds that the lawsuit was barred by the applicable three-year statute of limitations set forth in Mo.Rev.Stat. § 516.130(1) (2000). We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the trial court correctly found that Schae-fer's claim was time-barred by Mo.Rev. Stat. § 516.130(1). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).