Case Name: WILLIAM PALANSKY, APPELLANT, v. MAX REICH ET AL., RESPONDENTS
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1933-09-27
Citations: 111 N.J.L. 241
Docket Number: 
Parties: WILLIAM PALANSKY, APPELLANT, v. MAX REICH ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 111
Pages: 241–241

Head Matter:
WILLIAM PALANSKY, APPELLANT, v. MAX REICH ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Argued May 24, 1933
Decided September 27, 1933.
Eor the appellant, Walter V. Schwartz.
Eor the respondents, Ghandless, Weller «§ Selser.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion in the Supreme Court, and printed in 11 N. J. Mis. R. 106.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchabd, Parker, Case, Hehee, Perskie, Yan Buskiek, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.
For reversal — -None.