Case Name: In the Interest of A.C., Respondent. Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. L.H. (Father), Appellant, R.C. (Mother), Defendant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-10-18
Citations: 173 S.W.3d 661
Docket Number: No. WD 64688
Parties: In the Interest of A.C., Respondent. Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. L.H. (Father), Appellant, R.C. (Mother), Defendant.
Judges: Before SMITH, P.J., LOWENSTEIN and HOWARD, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 173
Pages: 661–661

Head Matter:
In the Interest of A.C., Respondent. Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. L.H. (Father), Appellant, R.C. (Mother), Defendant.
No. WD 64688.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Oct. 18, 2005.
Lance M. Haley, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant.
William R. Jackson, III, Kansas City, MO, for Respondent.
Katherine J. Rodgers, Kansas City, MO, Attorney and Guardian.
Before SMITH, P.J., LOWENSTEIN and HOWARD, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Father appeals the judgment terminating his parental rights to his daughter, A.C. The trial court terminated Father's rights holding that by clear, cogent and convincing evidence termination was justified under the grounds stated in Section 211.447.4(2) and (3), RSMo.2000, and that termination was in the best interest of the child. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).