Case Name: FIRST STATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WESTERN INVESTMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORP.; Keck's Drapery Manufacturing Co.; James C. Barggren; Douglas D. Barman; Larry Barman; Ben Giles; Harold Murphree; G.L. Scott; Madonna L. Dunn; John F. O'Donnell; Michael Pelphrey; Maurice J. Collins; Roy W. Hennings; and John Budesky, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1990-02-26
Citations: 895 F.2d 1576
Docket Number: No. 88-5518
Parties: FIRST STATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WESTERN INVESTMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORP.; Keck’s Drapery Manufacturing Co.; James C. Barggren; Douglas D. Barman; Larry Barman; Ben Giles; Harold Murphree; G.L. Scott; Madonna L. Dunn; John F. O’Donnell; Michael Pelphrey; Maurice J. Collins; Roy W. Hennings; and John Budesky, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before GOODWIN, Chief Judge, BROWNING, TANG, FARRIS, PREGERSON, CANBY, NORRIS, BEEZER, HALL, LEAVY and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 895
Pages: 1576–1577

Head Matter:
FIRST STATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WESTERN INVESTMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORP.; Keck’s Drapery Manufacturing Co.; James C. Barggren; Douglas D. Barman; Larry Barman; Ben Giles; Harold Murphree; G.L. Scott; Madonna L. Dunn; John F. O’Donnell; Michael Pelphrey; Maurice J. Collins; Roy W. Hennings; and John Budesky, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 88-5518.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Feb. 26, 1990.
Before GOODWIN, Chief Judge, BROWNING, TANG, FARRIS, PREGERSON, CANBY, NORRIS, BEEZER, HALL, LEAVY and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
In light of the parties' settlement of the underlying action, the court concludes that en banc would be improvident and that the appeal should be dismissed for want of a case or controversy.
The order granting en banc review is vacated. The appeal is dismissed as moot.