Case Name: Thomas F. McCarthy et al., Executors (Estate of Timothy F. McCarthy) v. Marion McCarthy
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1969-11-13
Citations: 158 Conn. 624
Docket Number: 
Parties: Thomas F. McCarthy et al., Executors (Estate of Timothy F. McCarthy) v. Marion McCarthy
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 158
Pages: 624–624

Head Matter:
Thomas F. McCarthy et al., Executors (Estate of Timothy F. McCarthy) v. Marion McCarthy
King, C. J., Alcorn, House, Thim and Ryan, Js.
Argued November 12
decided November 13, 1969
Thomas L. Brayton, for the appellants (plaintiffs).
Vincent Matasavage, for the appellee (defendant).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
In the light of Prince v. Sheffield, 158 Conn. 286, 299, 300, 259 A.2d 621, there is error. The judgment is set aside and the case is remanded to the Superior Court for a new trial of the appeal from the Probate Court.