Case Name: MATRE v. MATRE et
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1928-03-05
Citations: 6 Ohio Law Abs. 484
Docket Number: No. 3150
Parties: MATRE v. MATRE et.
Judges: (Hamilton, PJ., Mills and Cushing, JJ., concur.)
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 6
Pages: 484–484

Head Matter:
MATRE v. MATRE et.
Ohio Appeals, 1st Dist., Hamilton Co.
No. 3150.
Decided Mar. 5, 1928.
Thos. L. Michie, Judson A. Shuey, and Albert R. Hoffman, Cincinnati, for plaintiff in error.
Franks & Franks, and Gardner, Freking & Overbade, Cincinnati, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
FULL TEXT.
PER CURIAM.
Under the facts of this case, to grant the relief sought would, in effect, require the adoption of a rule of community interest of the husband and wife in personal property. Such a doctrine is unknown to the Ohio law.
The separate findings of fact by the trial court are sustained by the evidence, and the conclusion of law, based on those findings, is correct.'
The judgment of the Court of Common Pleas is affirmed.
(Hamilton, PJ., Mills and Cushing, JJ., concur.)