Case Name: Steven G. LOUGH, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BRUNSWICK CORPORATION, d/b/a Mercury Marine, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1997-01-02
Citations: 103 F.3d 1517
Docket Number: Nos. 95-1266, 95-1302, 95-1314
Parties: Steven G. LOUGH, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BRUNSWICK CORPORATION, d/b/a Mercury Marine, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Circuit Judge LOURIE concurs in a separate opinion.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 103
Pages: 1517–1538

Head Matter:
Steven G. LOUGH, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BRUNSWICK CORPORATION, d/b/a Mercury Marine, Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 95-1266, 95-1302, 95-1314.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Jan. 2, 1997.
Ward E. Dahlgren and Richard R. Garland, Dickinson & Gibbons, P.A., Sarasota, FL, submitted a petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in bane for plaintiffappellee. With him on the petition were Arnold B. Silverman and Kirk D. Houser, Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, Pittsburgh, PA.
George H. Solveson and Edward R. Williams, Jr., Andrus, Seeales, Starke & Sawall, Milwaukee, WI, submitted a response to plaintiff-appellee’s petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in banc.

Opinion:
ORDER
A combined petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in banc having been filed by the APPELLEE, and a response thereto having been invited by the court and filed by the APPELLANT, and the petition for rehearing having been referred to and acted upon by the panel that heard the appeal, and, thereafter, the suggestion for rehearing in banc and response having been referred to the judges authorized to request a poll whether to rehear the appeal in banc, and a poll having been requested, taken, and failed, it is
ORDERED that the petition for rehearing be, and the same hereby is, DENIED, and it is further
ORDERED that the suggestion for rehearing in banc be, and the same hereby is, DECLINED.
Circuit Judge LOURIE concurs in a separate opinion.
Circuit Judge NEWMAN, with whom Circuit Judge RADER joins, dissents in a separate opinion.
Circuit Judge PLAGER, with whom Circuit Judge RADER joins, dissents in a separate opinion.
Circuit Judge MICHEL dissents in a separate opinion.
Circuit Judge RADER dissents in a separate opinion.