Case Name: UNITED STATES ex rel. Frank J. EPPELE, Appellant, v. Frederic J. SCHNEIDER, United States Marshal, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1926-06-10
Citations: 12 F.2d 1019
Docket Number: No. 3440
Parties: UNITED STATES ex rel. Frank J. EPPELE, Appellant, v. Frederic J. SCHNEIDER, United States Marshal, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 12
Pages: 1019–1019

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES ex rel. Frank J. EPPELE, Appellant, v. Frederic J. SCHNEIDER, United States Marshal, Appellee.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
June 10, 1926.)
No. 3440.
Before BUFFINGTON and WOOLLEY, Circuit Judges, and GIBSON, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
On due consideration had, this court reached the opinion that the appellant should be remanded to the Northern district of Ohio for trial. In view of the fact that the same question was before the Supreme Court, we deferred filing our opinion. The recent decision of that case (United States v. Gault, 46 S. Ct. 459, 70 L. Ed.) confirms our view and relieves us of the necessity of supporting our conclusion by an opinion in this ease.
The order dismissing the petition for a writ of habeas corpus and directing the issuance of a warrant for the petitioner's removal is affirmed.