Case Name: Phillip PIZARRO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-02-12
Citations: 593 So. 2d 604
Docket Number: No. 90-2799
Parties: Phillip PIZARRO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: LETTS, STONE and WARNER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 593
Pages: 604–604

Head Matter:
Phillip PIZARRO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 90-2799.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb. 12, 1992.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Tanja Ostapoff, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James J. Carney, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The state concedes that the trial court used the wrong scoresheet; a category-nine form instead of a category eight. This cause is reversed and remanded for the preparation of a corrected guidelines scoresheet. Because the trial court did not realize that it was imposing a departure sentence, the trial court may, on remand, consider whether departure is appropriate. Butler v. State, 579 So.2d 327 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).
We find no reversible error in the remaining points on appeal.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
LETTS, STONE and WARNER, JJ., concur.