Case Name: SMITH v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1915-03-17
Citations: 174 S.W. 824
Docket Number: No. 3473
Parties: SMITH v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 174
Pages: 824–824

Head Matter:
SMITH v. STATE.
(No. 3473.)
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
March 17, 1915.)
Ceiminal Law <©=>1097 — Appeal — Statement of Facts.
In the • absence of a statement of facts, grounds in a motion for new trial that the verdict was contrary to the law and evidence cannot be considered.
[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2862, 2864, 2926, 2934, 2938, 2939, 2941, 2942, 2947; Dee. Dig. <©=> 1097.]
Appeal from Dallas County Court, at Law; W. F. Whitehurst, Judge.
Edna Smith was convicted of keeping a disorderly house, and she appeals.
Affirmed.
Q. C. McDonald, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Opinion:
HARPER, J.
Appellant was convicted of keeping a disorderly house, and her punishment assessed at a fine of $200 and 20 days' imprisonment in the county jail.
The only grounds in the motion allege: (1) The verdict is contrary to the law; (2) the
verdict is contrary to the evidence. As no statement of facts accompanies the record, such grounds cannot be considered.
The judgment ,is affirmed.