Case Name: Michael GANTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-03-28
Citations: 576 So. 2d 932
Docket Number: No. 90-1335
Parties: Michael GANTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: COBB, HARRIS and PETERSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 576
Pages: 932–932

Head Matter:
Michael GANTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 90-1335.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
March 28, 1991.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Paolo G. Annino, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James N. Charles, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on authority of Flowers v. State, 567 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990) and Walker v. State, 546 So.2d 764 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). We certify the following question to the Florida Supreme Court, as we did in Flowers:
DO FLORIDA'S UNIFORM SENTENCING GUIDELINES REQUIRE THAT LEGAL CONSTRAINT POINTS BE ASSESSED FOR EACH OFFENSE COMMITTED WHILE UNDER LEGAL CONSTRAINT?
COBB, HARRIS and PETERSON, JJ., concur.