Case Name: Bedes Tamasang NDENGE, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-09-15
Citations: 293 F. App'x 225
Docket Number: No. 08-1227
Parties: Bedes Tamasang NDENGE, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 293
Pages: 225–225

Head Matter:
Bedes Tamasang NDENGE, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 08-1227.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 22, 2008.
Decided: Sept. 15, 2008.
Bedes Tamasang Ndenge, Petitioner Pro Se. Andrew Brinkman, Craig William Kuhn, Trial Attorney, Elizabeth Joanne Stevens, Senior Litigation Counsel, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Bedes Tamasang Ndenge, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("Board") denying his second motion to reopen. We have reviewed the record and the Board's order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2008). Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Ndenge (B.I.A. Jan. 30, 2008). We deny Ndenge's motion to reopen and remand to the immigration judge. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.