Case Name: Scott TOPPINS, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-03-28
Citations: 14 S.W.3d 696
Docket Number: No. ED 76660
Parties: Scott TOPPINS, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Respondent.
Judges: Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 14
Pages: 696–697

Head Matter:
Scott TOPPINS, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Respondent.
No. ED 76660.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
March 28, 2000.
Gordon E. Freese, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Evan J. Buchheim, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Scott Toppins appeals the trial court's denial of his Petition for Limited Driving Privilege. We find the judgment is supported by substantial .evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memo randum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).