Case Name: Willie Lee HINES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-10-09
Citations: 591 So. 2d 270
Docket Number: No. 91-2058
Parties: Willie Lee HINES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ANSTEAD, GUNTHER and WARNER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 591
Pages: 270–270

Head Matter:
Willie Lee HINES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 91-2058.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Oct. 9, 1991.
Willie L. Hines, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Carol Cobourn Asbury, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. Although we agree with appellant that he was entitled to raise the alleged sentencing error by way of motion under Rule 3.800, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, we find the reasons given by the sentencing court in retaining jurisdiction over appellant's sentence to be sufficient. Cf. Moore v. State, 392 So.2d 277 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).
ANSTEAD, GUNTHER and WARNER, JJ., concur.