Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kevin LANGSTON, a/k/a Little One, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-10-02
Citations: 479 F. App'x 508
Docket Number: No. 12-6856
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kevin LANGSTON, a/k/a Little One, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 479
Pages: 508–509

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kevin LANGSTON, a/k/a Little One, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-6856.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 27, 2012.
Decided: Oct. 2, 2012.
Kevin Langston, Appellant Pro Se. Roderick Charles Young, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kevin Langston appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Langston, No. 3:03-cr-00394-JRS-26 (E.D.Va. Apr. 17, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.