Case Name: Chester D. GRIESEMER, appellant, v. The KNOX HAT MANUFACTURING COMPANY, respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1916-03-31
Citations: 158 N.Y.S. 1117
Docket Number: 
Parties: Chester D. GRIESEMER, appellant, v. The KNOX HAT MANUFACTURING COMPANY, respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 158
Pages: 1117–1117

Head Matter:
Chester D. GRIESEMER, appellant, v. The KNOX HAT MANUFACTURING COMPANY, respondent.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
March 31, 1916.)
Judgment and order z-eversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the grounds that there was no substantial evidence to establish conspiracy as a defense, and that the trial couz't erred to the prejudice of the defendant in excluding the original answer .(folio 576), and in refusing to permit the plaintiff to testify that in entering into the contract in suit he relied upon the apparent authority of the general manager, MacFarland, to make such contracts, as shown by his action in making previous like contracts (folio 96).

Opinion:
Jenks, P. J., and Tilomas, Mills, and Rich, JJ., concur. Garr, J., not voting.