Case Name: Anna Graham, Respondent, v. Knickerbocker Insurance Company of New York, Appellant; Rosendale Developing Company, Inc., Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1934-11
Citations: 242 A.D. 890
Docket Number: 
Parties: Anna Graham, Respondent, v. Knickerbocker Insurance Company of New York, Appellant; Rosendale Developing Company, Inc., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 242
Pages: 890–890

Head Matter:
Anna Graham, Respondent, v. Knickerbocker Insurance Company of New York, Appellant; Rosendale Developing Company, Inc., Respondent.

Opinion:
— Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Judgments were in favor of the first and second mortgagees against the insurance company. The correct corporate name of the second mortgagee is " Rosendale Developing Company, Inc." The insurance policy carried the name " Rosendale Development Co." The slight discrepancy is without significance. The proof as to damages was proper under McAnarney v. Newark Fire Ins. Co. (247 N. Y. 176). There was no proof offered showing that the insured building was used as a hotel or store during the term of the policy. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.