Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. JEFFREY SHANE WASHBURN, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1981-09-28
Citations: 54 Or. App. 64
Docket Number: No. J80-1549, CA 19532
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. JEFFREY SHANE WASHBURN, Appellant.
Judges: Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Roberts and Young, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 54
Pages: 64–66

Head Matter:
On respondent’s petiton for reconsideration filed August 19,
petition for reconsideration granted; former opinion filed July 27 (53 Or App 258, 631 P2d 8271
adhered to as modified September 28, 1981
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. JEFFREY SHANE WASHBURN, Appellant.
(No. J80-1549, CA 19532)
633 P2d 1321
Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, William F. Gary, Solicitor General, and Thomas H. Denney, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, for petition.
Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Roberts and Young, Judges.
ROBERTS, J.

Opinion:
ROBERTS, J.
In this case we reduced defendant's conviction for stripping bark from chittamwood trees from criminal mischief in the first degree, ORS 164.365, to criminal mischief in the third degree, ORS 164.345, based on our finding that the evidence was insufficient to establish a monetary amount of damage. 53 Or App 258, 631 P2d 827 (1981). In its petition for review, the state correctly points out that intentional damage to the property of another in any amount is criminal mischief in the second degree. ORS 164.354. Defendant admitted he stripped the bark from the trees intentionally. Our former opinion is therefore modified to reverse and remand for entry of a new judgment and resentencing for the crime of criminal mischief in the second degree.
Petition for reconsideration granted; former opinion adhered to as modified.