Case Name: Vino Kumar SAVAL and Gita Kamala Nanikram, Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-05-05
Citations: 649 F.3d 1066
Docket Number: No. 05-75622
Parties: Vino Kumar SAVAL and Gita Kamala Nanikram, Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: JOHN T. NOONAN, M. MARGARET McKEOWN and CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 649
Pages: 1066–1066

Head Matter:
Vino Kumar SAVAL and Gita Kamala Nanikram, Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 05-75622.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 5, 2011.
Alison L. Dixon, Law Office of Alison Dixon, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioners.
Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Robert Markle, OIL, Norah Ascoli Schwarz, Senior Litigation Counsel, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Joan Elizabeth Marshall, Trial, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Dallas, TX, for Respondent.
Agency Nos. [ AXXX-XXX-XXX ], [ AXXX-XXXXXX ].
Before: JOHN T. NOONAN, M. MARGARET McKEOWN and CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
. Judge McKeown was drawn to replace Judge Hall on this panel after her death.

Opinion:
ORDER
Respondent's motion to vacate the judgment is granted. The opinion and dissent filed on September 23, 2010 are hereby withdrawn.