Case Name: Jack BRYANT and John Bryant, d/b/a Bryant Electric Company, Appellants, v. ROBERT S. FISHER, INC., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-06-09
Citations: 599 So. 2d 285
Docket Number: No. 92-336
Parties: Jack BRYANT and John Bryant, d/b/a Bryant Electric Company, Appellants, v. ROBERT S. FISHER, INC., Appellee.
Judges: Before BASKIN, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 599
Pages: 285–285

Head Matter:
Jack BRYANT and John Bryant, d/b/a Bryant Electric Company, Appellants, v. ROBERT S. FISHER, INC., Appellee.
No. 92-336.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
June 9, 1992.
Walton Lantaff Schroeder & Carson and Robert L. Teitler, Miami, for appellants.
Atlas, Pearlman & Trop, P.A., and Howard N. Kahn, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
Before BASKIN, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellants/plaintiffs appeal from a final judgment entered following the grant of appellee/defendant's motion for summary judgment. We reverse.
The trial court erred in basing its summary judgment ruling on the defendant's "uncontroverted expert testimony." The plaintiffs in this case presented evidence which directly conflicted with the expert testimony, thereby showing that a genuine issue of material fact existed. Summary judgment was therefore improper. See Thrasher v. Koehring Co., 543 So.2d 754 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).
Reversed.