Case Name: The People ex rel. Rachel Purdy, Resp't, v. Ashbel P. Fitch, as Comptroller, etc., App'lt
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1895-06-14
Citations: 68 N.Y. St. Rep. 320
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People ex rel. Rachel Purdy, Resp’t, v. Ashbel P. Fitch, as Comptroller, etc., App’lt.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 68
Pages: 320–324

Head Matter:
The People ex rel. Rachel Purdy, Resp’t, v. Ashbel P. Fitch, as Comptroller, etc., App’lt.
(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department,
Filed June 14, 1895.)
Municipal corporation — Streets—Grade.
The appointment of commissioners, pursuant to chapter 567 of 1894, to ascertain damages ‘ ‘ suffered by reason of change of grade of streets and avenues, made pursuant to chapter 721 of the Laws of 1887,” is a defective exercise of the power of appointment and confers on the commissioners no authority to do the additional things, which are provided for by the act of 1894.
Appeal from an order, granting a peremptory writ of mandamus.
Theo. Connoly, for app’lt; T. S. Bassford, for resp’t

Opinion:
Van Brunt, P. J,
— In May, 1893, the legislature passed an act entitled "An act providing for ascertaining and paying the amount of damages to lands and buildings suffered by reason of -changes of grades of streets or avenues made pursuant to chapter 721 of the Laws of 1887, providing for the depression of railroad tracks in the twenty-third and twenty-fourth wards in the city of New York, or otherwise." By the first section of this act certain property owners were entitled to recover and prove certain damages as in said act provided. By the second section, within thirty days after its passage, the mayor of the city of New York was authorized and directed to appoint three commissioners for the purpose of estimating such loss and damage. The duties and powers of the commissioners were then provided for in the act. On the 8th day of May, 1893, the mayor appointed Daniel Lord, James M. Varnum and James A. Deering as commissioners " to ascertain and pay the amount of damages to lands and buildings suffered by reason of the changes of grades of streets or avenues made pursuant to chapter 721 of the Laws of 1887 •or otherwise." On the same day the said commissioners accepted said appointment, and each subscribed a'nd took the •oath required by said act of 1893 (chapter 537, Laws 1893). On the 7th of day June, 1893, one Rachel Purdy filed her claim with the comptroller, and hearings were had upon said claims, commencing in October, 1893, and continuing until the 6th of July, 1894. On the 28th of February, 1894, the claimant moved to amend the amount of damages alleged in the claim filed with the 'Comptroller and the corporation counsel, by increasing the amount of the damage. On the 2d of May, 1894, the legislature passed another act, known as " Chapter 567 of the Laws of 1894," which was entitled as follows : "An act to amend chapter 537 of the Laws of 1893, entitled 'An act providing for ascertaining and paying the amount of damages to lands and buildings •suffered by reason of changes of grade of streets or avenues made pursuant to chapter 721 of the Laws of 1887, providing for the depression of railroad tracks in the Twenty-third and Twenty-fourth wards in the city of New York or otherwise." By this act sections 1-7, inclusive, of chapter 537 of the Laws of 1893 were amended. The amendment to section 1 consisted of inserting after the words "have sustained damage," the words, "or will sustain damages; " and also inserting therein reference to certain other session laws. Section 2 of said act was amended by inserting therein the words, "or will sustain by reason of such change." Sections 3 and 4 are substantially the same in both acts. Sections 5, 6, and 7 were amended in particulars not necessary to mention here. By the said act the title of the act of 1893 was amended so as to read as follows: "An act for ascertaining and paying the amount of damages to lands and buildings, suffered by reason of changes of grades of streets or avenues in the Twenty-third and Twenty-fourth wards of the city of New Y ark, made pursuant to chapter eight hundred and forty-one of the Laws of eighteen hundred and sixty-eight, chapters three hundred and twenty-nine and-six hundred and four of the Laws of eighteen hundred and seventy-four, chapter four hundred and thirty-six of the Laws of eighteen hundred and seventy-six, chapter seven hundred and twenty-one of the Laws of eighteen hnndred and eighty-seven, and chapter three hundred and twenty-nine of the Laws of eighteen hundred and ninety-two." Subsequent to the passage of this act, on the 6th of June, 1894, James A. Deering, one of the commissioners appointed under the provisions of chap ter 537 of the Laws of 1893, having theretofore, and on the 10th of November, 1893, resigned as one of said commissioners, and Daniel P. Hays having been appointed a commissioner in his place and stead, the then mayor of the city of New York, under the provisions of chapter 567 of the Laws of 1894, appointed Daniel Lord, James M. Varnum, and Daniel P. Hays as commissioners "to ascertain and pay the amount of damage to lands and buildings suffered by reason of changes of grades of streets and and avenues made pursuant to chapter 721 of the Laws of 1887." The said commissioners accepted the appointment, and qualified as commissioners, and entered upon the discharge of their duties as such commissioners, holding their first public meeting on the 11th of June, 1894. On the 14th of November, 1894, the said commissioners made an award to said Rachel Purdy, claiming to actas commissioners appointed pursuant to the provision of chapter 587 of the Laws of 1893, as amended by chapter 567 of the Laws of 1894; and said award purported to be for damages sustained, or which will be sustained, by reason of change of grade to certain premises located in the Twenty-third ward of the city of New York, and designated on the tax map of the city of New York as "Ward No. 4 in Block No. 1667." The comptroller having refused to issue bonds to pay the amount of said award, a motion was made for a peremptory mandamus diricting the issue of such bonds. That motion having been granted, this appeal from the order thereupon entered was taken.
It does not seem to he necessary to consider all the numerous objections which are raised to the constitutionality of the laws as they appear upon the statute book, the mistakes contained therein in their references to statutes, or the various omissions in the proceedings. It must be conceded, however, that in the amendment of chapter 537 of the Laws of 1893, made by chapter 567 of the Laws of 1894, a new statute was substantially enacted; and that proceedings which had been taken prior to the passage of the act of 1894, and not completed, in order to be made the foundation of a claim against the city, must be shown to have complied with the provisions of the act of 1894. It seems also, in view of the nature of the acts, to have been necessary for the mayor to reappoint commissioners, for the reason that by the provisions of the law of 1894 additional powers were conferred uponxthe commissioners appointed under the act of 1893 to those which they had originally enjoyed. The act of 1894 enjoined additional duties upon the commissioners, looking to the assessment of future damages, which was not the province of the commissioners appointed under the act of 1893. Hence the act of 1894 provided that commissioners should be appointed under that act for that purpose as well as the other. This was the construction placed upon the act by the mayor in making the appointment which he did under the act of 1894. But, unfortunately, in the making of this appointment he did not follow the act of 1894, but varied the language of the previous appointments; and hence he did not appoint the commissioners to do the things for which he was authorized to appoint them under the act of 1894. This would seem to make bis appointment fatally defective. The authority of the commissioners to act was necessarily derived from the appointment of the mayor, and the attempted appointment of commissioners under the act of 1894 seem to fail of effect because of the defective manner of its execution. This is an objection which seems to lie at the root of the whole of these proceedings. It is more than a mere clerical omission, and the additional powers cannot be attached to the appointment because the mayor had the authority to make an appointment of commissioners to do additional things. He appointed commissioners to ascertain the amount of damages to lands' and buildings suffered by reason of changes of grade of streets and avenues pursuant to chapter 721 of the Laws of 1887. He did not apppoint new commissioners to assess any damages which might be sustained in the future by reason of such change; neither did he appoint new commissioners to ascertain any damages which might have been sustained by reason of changes of grade arising under other acts. It seems, therefore, that there has been a defective exercise of the power of appointment upon the part of the mayor, and that under such defective exercise of that power these commissioners had conferred upon them no authority to do the additional things which were provided for by the act of 1894. It is contemplated in those acts that these commissioners shall take an oath to faithfully perform their duties as such. It is clear that such oath could not cover acts which they had not been commissioned to perform. These considerations seem to show that this irregularity of proceeding is of substance, and cannot be treated or overlooked as trivial. It appears from the award of the commissioners themselves that they have given prospective damages, which certainly was not embraced within the terms of their appointment We see no method in which this difficulty can be met except by commencing anew under the acts of 1894, or by some legislative action such as was resorted to for the purpose of curing the defects alleged to exist in the legislation of 1893.
The order appealed from should be reversed, with costs, and the motion denied, with costs.
Parker, J., concurs.