Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marshall Charles RICHMOND, a.k.a. Marshall Charles Richmond, III, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-02-21
Citations: 677 F. App'x 403
Docket Number: No. 16-30071
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marshall Charles RICHMOND, a.k.a. Marshall Charles Richmond, III, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: GOODWIN, FARRIS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 677
Pages: 403–404

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marshall Charles RICHMOND, a.k.a. Marshall Charles Richmond, III, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-30071
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted February 14, 2017
Filed February 21, 2017
Jennifer Jane Martin, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Kelly A. Zusman, Assistant U.S. Attorney, DOJ-USAO, Portland, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Marshall Charles Richmond, Pro Se
Before: GOODWIN, FARRIS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Marshall Charles Richmond appeals from the revocation of supervised release and the 24-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Richmond's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Richmond has filed a pro se supplemental brief. No answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.