Case Name: Thomas CUNNINGHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-06-20
Citations: 23 S.W.3d 845
Docket Number: No. ED 76073
Parties: Thomas CUNNINGHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANE, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, J., and SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 23
Pages: 845–845

Head Matter:
Thomas CUNNINGHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 76073.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Diyision Two.
June 20, 2000.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 25, 2000.
Application for Transfer Denied Aug. 29, 2000.
David C. Hemingway, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
John Munson Morris, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before CRANE, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, J., and SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Thomas Cunningham ("Defendant") appeals from a judgment denying his request for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15. Defendant claims ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's judgment is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2000, unless otherwise indicated.