Case Name: The BEHRENS COMPANY, INC., Appellant, v. B.D. RAWLS, et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1987-12-29
Citations: 518 So. 2d 945
Docket Number: No. 87-2363
Parties: The BEHRENS COMPANY, INC., Appellant, v. B.D. RAWLS, et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 518
Pages: 945–946

Head Matter:
The BEHRENS COMPANY, INC., Appellant, v. B.D. RAWLS, et al., Appellees.
No. 87-2363.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 29, 1987.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 11, 1988.
James C. Blecke, Miami, for appellant.
Rice & Reiser, Daniels & Hicks and Patrice Talisman, Miami, Spear & Hoffman, Coral Gables, for appellees.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The trial court did not err in granting the appellee's motion for dissolution pursuant to section 607.274(l)(a)(2), Florida Statutes (1985), because the evidence clearly indicates that the shareholders are hopelessly deadlocked at present and have been so for a number of years. Accordingly, we affirm the order under review.