Case Name: Valerie IENGO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-06-05
Citations: 686 So. 2d 13
Docket Number: No. 94-03468
Parties: Valerie IENGO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: THREADGILL, A.C.J., and FRANK and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 686
Pages: 13–13

Head Matter:
Valerie IENGO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 94-03468.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
June 5, 1996.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Karen Kinney, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wendy Buffington, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm appellant's judgment and sentence. We strike, however, condition 9 of the orders of probation and community control because it is a special condition which was not orally pronounced at sentencing. Nank v. State, 646 So.2d 762 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). We also strike the words "at your own expense" from condition 10 for the same reason. Luby v. State, 648 So.2d 308 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).
Affirmed as modified.
THREADGILL, A.C.J., and FRANK and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.