Case Name: STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Shinnosuke ONO, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-10-12
Citations: 552 So. 2d 234
Docket Number: No. 88-2457
Parties: STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Shinnosuke ONO, Appellee.
Judges: COBB and COWART, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 552
Pages: 234–235

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Shinnosuke ONO, Appellee.
No. 88-2457.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Oct. 12, 1989.
Rehearing Denied Nov. 4, 1989.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Thomas F. Almon of Almon & Brodsky, P.A., Miami and Stephen J. Bronis of Bron-is & Pórtela, P.A., Miami, for appellee.

Opinion:
GOSHORN, Judge.
The State appeals a pretrial order granting appellee's motion in limine to exclude from evidence ten tape recordings of telephone conversations between appellee and Kraus. Because the parties agree that Kraus consented to the taping of the calls, we reverse and remand. State v. Welker, 536 So.2d 1017 (Fla.1988); § 934.03(2)(c), Fla.Stat. (1987).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
COBB and COWART, JJ., concur.
. This interlocutory order is properly the subject of a direct appeal. State v. Palmore, 495 So.2d 1170 (Fla.1986).