Case Name: Theresa Caspary, by John Caspary, Her Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Joseph Bardong and Others, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1933-05
Citations: 239 A.D. 849
Docket Number: 
Parties: Theresa Caspary, by John Caspary, Her Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Joseph Bardong and Others, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 239
Pages: 849–849

Head Matter:
Theresa Caspary, by John Caspary, Her Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Joseph Bardong and Others, Appellants.

Opinion:
Amended order denying defendants' motion for a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence unanimously affirmed, with costs. The motion papers fail to show that any effort was made, prior to the trial, to ascertain where plaintiff was employed. The so-called newly-discovered evidence was available long before the trial and could have been obtained by the exercise of reasonable diligence. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ.