Case Name: William J. DOCKERAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kelly DIXION, Assistant Warden, Unknown No 3, Fnu Simpson, M Wooten, Fnu Harmon, Lieutenant, Unknown No 4, Fnu Garcia, Mailroom Supervisor, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-08-03
Citations: 106 F. App'x 267
Docket Number: No. 04-40467
Parties: William J. DOCKERAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kelly DIXION, Assistant Warden, Unknown No 3, Fnu Simpson, M Wooten, Fnu Harmon, Lieutenant, Unknown No 4, Fnu Garcia, Mailroom Supervisor, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 106
Pages: 267–268

Head Matter:
William J. DOCKERAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kelly DIXION, Assistant Warden, Unknown No 3, Fnu Simpson, M Wooten, Fnu Harmon, Lieutenant, Unknown No 4, Fnu Garcia, Mailroom Supervisor, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 04-40467.
Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed Aug. 3, 2004.
Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
William J. Dockeray, Texas prisoner # 563359, appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for a preliminary injunction, in which he asked that the court order prison officials to provide him with additional legal supplies. He has not established that he satisfied the four factors that he must establish in order to prevail on a request for a preliminary injunction. See Lakedreams v. Taylor, 932 F.2d 1103, 1107 (5th Cir.1991). Consequently, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying his request for an injunction. See White v. Carlucci, 862 F.2d 1209, 1211 (5th Cir.1989). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.