Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Narciso MONTES-PAYAN, a.k.a. Gregorio Torres-Quintero; et al., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-10-17
Citations: 203 F. App'x 118
Docket Number: No. 06-30222
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Narciso MONTES-PAYAN, a.k.a. Gregorio Torres-Quintero; et al., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: TASHIMA, W. FLETCHER and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 203
Pages: 118–119

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Narciso MONTES-PAYAN, a.k.a. Gregorio Torres-Quintero; et al., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-30222.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 11, 2006.
Filed Oct. 17, 2006.
James P. Hagarty, Esq., USYA-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Yakima, WA, for Plaintiff — Appellee.
Tracy Staab, FPDWA-Federal Public Defender’s Office, Spokane, WA, for Defendant — Appellant.
Before: TASHIMA, W. FLETCHER and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Narciso Montes-Payan appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. section 1326.
We have reviewed the record, the response to the motion for summary affir-mance, and the opening brief and conclude that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Appellant's argument that the fact of the temporal relationship of the removal to the prior conviction is beyond the scope of the Supreme Court's recidivism exception is foreclosed by United States v. Castillo-Rivera, 244 F.3d 1020, 1025 (9th Cir.2001). Further, the United States Supreme Court's decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 247, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), remains binding on this court until the Court overrules it. See United States v. Weiland, 420 F.3d 1062, 1079 n. 16 (9th Cir.2005); see also United States v. Beng-Salazar, 452 F.3d 1088 (9th Cir.2006).
Accordingly, the government's motion for summary affirmance of the district court's judgment is granted.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.