Case Name: Rowland A. WHEELER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard CONWAY, Commonwealth Attorney, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-11-26
Citations: 255 F. App'x 697
Docket Number: No. 07-7035
Parties: Rowland A. WHEELER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Richard CONWAY, Commonwealth Attorney, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 255
Pages: 697–698

Head Matter:
Rowland A. WHEELER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Richard CONWAY, Commonwealth Attorney, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 07-7035.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 15, 2007.
Decided: Nov. 26, 2007.
Rowland A. Wheeler, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Rowland A. Wheeler appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Wheeler v. Conway, No. 2:07-cv-00286 (E.D. Va. filed July 2, 2007 & entered July 5, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.