Case Name: Bertram H. Siegeltuch et al., Respondents, v. Golden Development, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1943-01-25
Citations: 265 A.D. 1018
Docket Number: 
Parties: Bertram H. Siegeltuch et al., Respondents, v. Golden Development, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 265
Pages: 1018–1019

Head Matter:
Bertram H. Siegeltuch et al., Respondents, v. Golden Development, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Opinion:
The deleted decretal paragraphs are too drastic under the doctrine of Levy v. Schreyer (177 N. Y. 293). Findings of fact and conclusions of law inconsistent herewith are reversed and new findings and conclusions will be made. Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur; Adel, J., concurs in the result. ' Settle order on notice within ten days from date of this decision.