Case Name: Cathy B. BRANCH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF RICHMOND; Claude G. Cooper; Dyett B. Ellis, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-06-17
Citations: 36 F. App'x 536
Docket Number: No. 02-1047
Parties: Cathy B. BRANCH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF RICHMOND; Claude G. Cooper; Dyett B. Ellis, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 36
Pages: 536–537

Head Matter:
Cathy B. BRANCH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF RICHMOND; Claude G. Cooper; Dyett B. Ellis, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 02-1047.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 23, 2002.
Decided June 17, 2002.
Cathy B. Branch, Appellant Pro Se. Beverly Agee Burton, Assistant City Attorney, Keith Allen May, City Attorney’s Office, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Cathy B. Branch appeals the magistrate judge's order granting Defendants' motion for summary judgment and dismissing Branch's employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Branch v. City of Richmond, No. CA-01-366-3 (E.D.Va. Dec. 4, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
The magistrate judge had jurisdiction to enter a final order pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(c) (West 1993 & Supp.2001).