Case Name: Charlotte TATE, Appellant, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION ST. LOUIS CITY and Division of Employment Security, Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-11-25
Citations: 121 S.W.3d 267
Docket Number: No. ED 82394
Parties: Charlotte TATE, Appellant, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION ST. LOUIS CITY and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL JR., J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 121
Pages: 267–268

Head Matter:
Charlotte TATE, Appellant, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION ST. LOUIS CITY and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.
No. ED 82394.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Nov. 25, 2003.
Charlotte Tate, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Larry R. Ruhmann, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL JR., J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
Charlotte Tate ("claimant") appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission ("Commission") reversing the decision and award of an Appeals Referee ("Referee") of the Missouri Division of Employment Security ("Division") on her claim for unemployment compensation.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).