Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Dewayne CLARK, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-09-30
Citations: 332 F. App'x 903
Docket Number: No. 09-6300
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Dewayne CLARK, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 332
Pages: 903–903

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Dewayne CLARK, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-6300.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 14, 2009.
Decided: Sept. 30, 2009.
Michael Dewayne Clark, Appellant Pro Se. William Corley Lucius, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael Dewayne Clark appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a court order directing the federal government to take custody of him or allow him to serve his federal sentence concurrently with his state sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Clark, No. 7:92-cr-00417-GRA-1 (D.S.C. Jan. 30, 2009). We deny the motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.