Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Hugh M. GEE, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2007-07-24
Citations: 228 S.W.3d 628
Docket Number: No. WD 66754
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Hugh M. GEE, Appellant.
Judges: Before LOWENSTEIN, P.J., ELLIS and HARDWICK, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 228
Pages: 628–628

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Hugh M. GEE, Appellant.
No. WD 66754.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
July 24, 2007.
Laura G. Martin, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before LOWENSTEIN, P.J., ELLIS and HARDWICK, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Hugh Gee appeals from his conviction for possession of a controlled substance. He contends the trial court erred in admitting evidence of uncharged crimes. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment of conviction. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose.
AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).