Case Name: Chauncey BENNETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kathleen GREEN, Warden; Scott Rowe, Hearing Officer; Stephen T. Moyer, Secretary of D.P.S.C.S., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-11-16
Citations: 670 F. App'x 188
Docket Number: No. 16-6724
Parties: Chauncey BENNETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kathleen GREEN, Warden; Scott Rowe, Hearing Officer; Stephen T. Moyer, Secretary of D.P.S.C.S., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 670
Pages: 188–189

Head Matter:
Chauncey BENNETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kathleen GREEN, Warden; Scott Rowe, Hearing Officer; Stephen T. Moyer, Secretary of D.P.S.C.S., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-6724
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: October 20, 2016
Decided: November 16, 2016
Chauncey Bennett, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas E. Dernoga, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appel-lees.
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Chauncey Demetrius Bennett appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to defendants and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bennett v. Green, No. l:15-cv-03030-JKB, 2016 WL 2853859 (D. Md. May 16, 2016). We dispense with oral argu ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED