Case Name: Paul A. WINGBERMUEHLE, Appellant, v. Ann M. WINGBERMUEHLE, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-01-29
Citations: 66 S.W.3d 183
Docket Number: No. ED 79019
Parties: Paul A. WINGBERMUEHLE, Appellant, v. Ann M. WINGBERMUEHLE, Respondent.
Judges: Before GEORGE W. DRAPER III, P.J., MARY R. RUSSELL, J., and MARY K. HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 66
Pages: 183–183

Head Matter:
Paul A. WINGBERMUEHLE, Appellant, v. Ann M. WINGBERMUEHLE, Respondent.
No. ED 79019.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Jan. 29, 2002.
Byron Cohen, Nathan S. Cohen (Guardian Ad Litem), Clayton, MO, for appellant.
Alan Agathen, Clayton, MO, for respondent.
Before GEORGE W. DRAPER III, P.J., MARY R. RUSSELL, J., and MARY K. HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Husband appeals from the judgment of dissolution entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis. He alleges the trial court erred and abused its discretion in dividing property, awarding child support, establishing custody, and ordering both parents to maintain health insurance for the parties' three minor children. We find no error and affirm.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).