Case Name: Charles JONES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2008-10-28
Citations: 271 S.W.3d 32
Docket Number: No. ED 88705
Parties: Charles JONES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before BOOKER T. SHAW, P.J., and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and MARY K. HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 271
Pages: 32–32

Head Matter:
Charles JONES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 88705.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Oct. 28, 2008.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Dec. 9, 2008.
Edward Scott Thompson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Evan J. Buchheim, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before BOOKER T. SHAW, P.J., and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and MARY K. HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Charles Jones (Movant) appeals from the motion court's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Judgment (Judgment) denying his Rule 24.035 Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct the Judgment or Sentence.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 84.16(b)(2); Rule 24.035(k). No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been furnished a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).