Case Name: Harold Schutrum et al., Respondents, v. George E. Horton et al., Defendants and Third Party Plaintiffs-Appellants. Bertha Kies, Third Party Defendant-Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1947-11-12
Citations: 272 A.D.2d 1086
Docket Number: 
Parties: Harold Schutrum et al., Respondents, v. George E. Horton et al., Defendants and Third Party Plaintiffs-Appellants. Bertha Kies, Third Party Defendant-Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 272
Pages: 1086–1086

Head Matter:
Harold Schutrum et al., Respondents, v. George E. Horton et al., Defendants and Third Party Plaintiffs-Appellants. Bertha Kies, Third Party Defendant-Respondent.

Opinion:
Defendants and third party plaintiffs, have appealed from an order of the Chemung County Court, granting the third party defendant's motion to dismiss the third party complaint. The action is. for the specific performance of a contract for the sale of real estate. In their answer defendants allege that their signatures to the contract were procured through false and fraudulent representations by the third party defendant, a real estate broker. The County Court properly held that defendants were not entitled' to implead the third party defendant under the provisions of section 193-a of the Civil Practice Act. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.