Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Lawrence COLEMAN, Defendant/Appellant; Lawrence COLEMAN, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-06-13
Citations: 904 S.W.2d 356
Docket Number: Nos. 64006, 66779
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Lawrence COLEMAN, Defendant/Appellant. Lawrence COLEMAN, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANE, P.J., and CRANDALL and DOWD, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 904
Pages: 356–357

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Lawrence COLEMAN, Defendant/Appellant. Lawrence COLEMAN, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent.
Nos. 64006, 66779.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
June 13, 1995.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 24, 1995.
Application to Transfer Denied Sept. 19, 1995.
Michael A. Gross, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Traci J. Sanders, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before CRANE, P.J., and CRANDALL and DOWD, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Lawrence Coleman appeals his conviction for first degree robbery, in violation of § 569.020 RSMo 1994, and armed criminal action, in violation of § 571.015 RSMo 1994. Coleman also appeals from an order denying his Rule 29.15 motion on the merits without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court's judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b) and Rule 84.16(b).