Case Name: Marion M. ACHINGER, Executrix of the Estate of William C. Achinger, deceased, Appellant, v. HANS HANSEN WELDING COMPANY, Inc., Owner of the Motorboat The Weldcraft, II, Appellee; Mildred WILLIAMS, Adm'x of the Estate of Allen Williams, deceased, et al., Appellants, v. HANS HANSEN WELDING COMPANY, Inc., Owner of the Motorboat The Weldcraft, II, Appellee; THE WELDCRAFT, II
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1952-04-07
Citations: 196 F.2d 222
Docket Number: Nos. 11440, 11441
Parties: Marion M. ACHINGER, Executrix of the Estate of William C. Achinger, deceased, Appellant, v. HANS HANSEN WELDING COMPANY, Inc., Owner of the Motorboat The Weldcraft, II, Appellee. Mildred WILLIAMS, Adm’x of the Estate of Allen Williams, deceased, et al., Appellants, v. HANS HANSEN WELDING COMPANY, Inc., Owner of the Motorboat The Weldcraft, II, Appellee. THE WELDCRAFT, II.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 196
Pages: 222–223

Head Matter:
Marion M. ACHINGER, Executrix of the Estate of William C. Achinger, deceased, Appellant, v. HANS HANSEN WELDING COMPANY, Inc., Owner of the Motorboat The Weldcraft, II, Appellee. Mildred WILLIAMS, Adm’x of the Estate of Allen Williams, deceased, et al., Appellants, v. HANS HANSEN WELDING COMPANY, Inc., Owner of the Motorboat The Weldcraft, II, Appellee. THE WELDCRAFT, II.
Nos. 11440, 11441.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
April 7, 1952.
McCreary, Hinslea & Ray, Cleveland, Ohio, Bryce & Duffey, and William A. Finn, and James Nye, all of Toledo, Ohio, for appellants.
Williams & Eversman, Toledo, Ohio, for appellee.
Before ALLEN, McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
These companion cases came on to be heard upon the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel.
And it appearing that decision is con- . trolled by certain questions of fact upon which the District Court made detailed findings which are not clearly against the preponderance of the evidence: The Cleveco, 6 Cir., 154 F.2d 605, 609; Larsson v. Coast wise Line, 9 Cir., 181 F.2d 6, 9, certiorari denied, 340 U.S. 833, 71 S.Ct. 55, 95 L.Ed. 612.
It is ordered that the judgments be, and they hereby are affirmed for the reasons stated in the findings of fact and conclusions- of law of the District Court.