Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward Nino ALFARO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-05-28
Citations: 380 F. App'x 693
Docket Number: No. 09-30033
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward Nino ALFARO, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, TROTT and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 380
Pages: 693–694

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward Nino ALFARO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-30033.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted May 24, 2010.
Filed May 28, 2010.
Anthony G. Hall, Esquire, Aaron Nicholas Lucoff, Esquire, Christian S. Nafzger, Esquire, Assistants U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Boise, ID, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Leo N. Griffard, Boise, ID, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, TROTT and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
1. "[B]ecause the jury would learn of his [prior conviction] in any event," Estelle v. Williams, 425 U.S. 501, 507, 96 S.Ct. 1691, 48 L.Ed.2d 126 (1976) (internal quotation marks omitted), and because the trial court appropriately instructed the ve-nire, Alfaro was not deprived of his constitutional right to a fair trial.
2. Alfaro's sentence was not proeedurally erroneous or substantively unreasonable. United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 993 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.