Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MICHAEL LEROY CASE, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1991-02-27
Citations: 106 Or. App. 177
Docket Number: CF 89-443; CA A63245
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MICHAEL LEROY CASE, Appellant.
Judges: Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 106
Pages: 177–178

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted December 21, 1990,
conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing February 27, 1991
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MICHAEL LEROY CASE, Appellant.
(CF 89-443; CA A63245)
806 P2d 185
Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.
Janet A. Klapstein, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Lauri Alsup, Certified Law Student, Salem.
Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant seeks modification of the sentence imposed following his conviction for attempted rape in the first degree. He argues that the trial court erred by imposing conditions of parole as part of the sentence. Although a trial court may recommend particular conditions of parole, it lacks authority to order them. State v. George, 90 Or App 496, 752 P2d 1265 (1988); State v. Duff, 54 Or App 669, 635 P2d 679 (1981). The state concedes the error, and we agree.
Conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing.