Case Name: ANTOINETTE COVIELLO, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1942-01-09
Citations: 127 N.J.L. 596
Docket Number: 
Parties: ANTOINETTE COVIELLO, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 127
Pages: 596–596

Head Matter:
ANTOINETTE COVIELLO, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Reargued October 21, 1941 —
Decided January 9, 1942.
For the appellant, Wall, Haight, Ccwey & Hartpence {John A. Hartpence and Charles J. Gormley, of counsel).
For the respondent, Collins <& Corbin {Edward A. Markley, Charles W. Broadhurst and Raymond J. Lamb, of counsel).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Reargument of the issue joined in this cause was had pursuant to leave duly granted. It leaves us convinced that the judgment should be reversed, for the reasons set down in the opinion heretofore filed herein and reported in 126 N. J. L. 536. Appellant may proceed accordingly.
For affirmance — Case, Donges, Porter, Dear, Wells, Thompson, JJ. 6.
For reversal — The Chancellor, Bodine, Heher, Colie, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 7.