Case Name: James F. HAMILL, Appellant, v. Edward MIODONSKI, Mathew Miodonski, and the Keyes Company, a Florida corporation, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1966-01-25
Citations: 182 So. 2d 464
Docket Number: No. 65-536
Parties: James F. HAMILL, Appellant, v. Edward MIODONSKI, Mathew Miodonski, and the Keyes Company, a Florida corporation, Appellees.
Judges: Before TILLMAN PARSON, CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 182
Pages: 464–464

Head Matter:
James F. HAMILL, Appellant, v. Edward MIODONSKI, Mathew Miodonski, and the Keyes Company, a Florida corporation, Appellees.
No. 65-536.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District
Jan. 25, 1966.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 22, 1966.
Alexander S. Gordon and Leonard Riv-kind, Miami Beach, for appellant.
Ruden, Barnett & McCloslcy, Ft. Lauder-dale, for appellee Miodonski.
Graham C. Miller, Miami, for appellee Keyes Co.
Before TILLMAN PARSON, CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on the authority of Kaminsky v. Wye, Fla.App.1961, 132 So.2d 44; Diaz v. Keyes Company, Fla.App.1962, 143 So. 2d 554.