Case Name: Smith, Appellant, et al., v. Inland Paperboard & Packaging, Inc., et al., Appellees
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2010-07-08
Citations: 126 Ohio St. 3d 64
Docket Number: Nos. 2009-1471 and 2009-1546
Parties: Smith, Appellant, et al., v. Inland Paperboard & Packaging, Inc., et al., Appellees.
Judges: Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 126
Pages: 64–64

Head Matter:
Smith, Appellant, et al., v. Inland Paperboard & Packaging, Inc., et al., Appellees.
[Cite as Smith v. Inland Paperboard & Packaging, Inc., 126 Ohio St.3d 64, 2010-Ohio-3133.]
(Nos. 2009-1471 and 2009-1546
— Submitted March 31, 2010
— Decided July 8, 2010.)
Paul W. Flowers Co., L.P.A., and Paul W. Flowers; and Webster, Dubyak & Weyls Co., L.P.A., and John R. Liber II, for appellant.
Kastner, Westman & Wilkins, L.L.C., Keith L. Pryatel, and Thomas Evan Green, for appellees.

Opinion:
{¶ 1} The certified question is answered in the affirmative and the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Kaminski v. Metal & Wire Prods. Co., 125 Ohio St.3d 250, 2010-Ohio-1027, 927 N.E.2d 1066, and Stetter v. R.J. Corman Derailment Servs., L.L.C., 125 Ohio St.3d 280, 2010-Ohio-1029, 927 N.E.2d 1092.
{¶ 2} Appellant's motion for full briefing and argument or, in the alternative, for remand is denied.
Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Pfeifer, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinions in Kaminski v. Metal & Wire Prods. Co. and R.J. Corman Derailment Servs.
Brown, C.J., not participating.