Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Walter Devon-Istashma YOUNG, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-10-25
Citations: 251 F. App'x 952
Docket Number: No. 06-21006
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Walter Devon-Istashma YOUNG, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 251
Pages: 952–953

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Walter Devon-Istashma YOUNG, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-21006
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Oct. 25, 2007.
James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Walter Devon-Istashma Young appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 135-month sentence for aiding and abetting bank robbery and use of a firearm during a crime of violence. Young contends that his sentence is unreasonable because this court's post-Booker rulings have effectively reinstated the mandatory sentencing guideline regime condemned in Booker. This argument is foreclosed. See Rita v. United States, - U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 2462, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007).
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.
. United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).