Case Name: Tyrone WEBB, a/k/a Tyrone F. Webb, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Steven GAL, Warden; Charles Molony Condon, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-07-20
Citations: 102 F. App'x 795
Docket Number: No. 03-7725
Parties: Tyrone WEBB, a/k/a Tyrone F. Webb, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Steven GAL, Warden; Charles Molony Condon, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents—Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 102
Pages: 795–796

Head Matter:
Tyrone WEBB, a/k/a Tyrone F. Webb, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Steven GAL, Warden; Charles Molony Condon, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents—Appellees.
No. 03-7725.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 15, 2004.
Decided: July 20, 2004.
Tyrone Webb, Appellant pro se.
Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Tyrone Egbert Webb seeks to appeal the district court's order accepting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The order is appealable only if a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Webb has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED