Case Name: Arthur RODGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Warden SHEARIN; Greg Flury; Ava Joubert, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-06-23
Citations: 576 F. App'x 216
Docket Number: No. 14-6283
Parties: Arthur RODGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Warden SHEARIN; Greg Flury; Ava Joubert, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 576
Pages: 216–216

Head Matter:
Arthur RODGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Warden SHEARIN; Greg Flury; Ava Joubert, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 14-6283.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 19, 2014.
Decided: June 23, 2014.
Arthur Rodgers, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Arthur Rodgers appeals the district court's orders dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) civil rights complaint for failure to comply with the court's earlier order to particularize and amend the complaint, and denying Rodgers' Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend that judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Rodgers v. Shearin, No. 1:13-cv-02902-CCB (D.Md. Jan. 31, 2014 & Feb. 27, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.