Case Name: John MOORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-03-25
Citations: 108 S.W.3d 46
Docket Number: No. ED 81170
Parties: John MOORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before MARY R. RUSSELL, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 108
Pages: 46–47

Head Matter:
John MOORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 81170.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
March 25, 2003.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 27, 2003.
Scott Thompson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
John Munson Morris III, Anne E. Edg-ington, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before MARY R. RUSSELL, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
John Moore appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. He asserts that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial. We find no error and affirm.
The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact and conclusions of law that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).