Case Name: Finest Investments, Appellant, v. Security Trust Company of Rochester et al., Respondents. (Action No. 1.) Fedele V. Scutti, Respondent, v. Finest Investments, Appellant. (Action No. 2.)
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1984-02-28
Citations: 61 N.Y.2d 897
Docket Number: 
Parties: Finest Investments, Appellant, v Security Trust Company of Rochester et al., Respondents. (Action No. 1.) Fedele V. Scutti, Respondent, v Finest Investments, Appellant. (Action No. 2.)
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 61
Pages: 897–899

Head Matter:
Finest Investments, Appellant, v Security Trust Company of Rochester et al., Respondents. (Action No. 1.) Fedele V. Scutti, Respondent, v Finest Investments, Appellant. (Action No. 2.)
Decided February 28, 1984
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Edwin Robert Schulman for appellant.
Warren B. Rosenbaum for respondents.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice James H. Boomer at the Appellate Division (96 AD2d 227).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.