Case Name: In the Matter of the State Division of Human Rights, on Complaint of Marie Johnson, Appellant, v. Oneida County Sheriff's Department, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1988-02-04
Citations: 70 N.Y.2d 974
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the State Division of Human Rights, on Complaint of Marie Johnson, Appellant, v Oneida County Sheriff’s Department, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 70
Pages: 974–981

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the State Division of Human Rights, on Complaint of Marie Johnson, Appellant, v Oneida County Sheriff’s Department, Respondent.
Submitted January 6, 1988;
decided February 4, 1988
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Margarita Rosa and Albert J. Kostelny, Jr., for appellant.
William S. Calli, County Attorney (John S. Balzano, of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (119 AD2d 1006).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Titone and Bellacosa. Judge Hancock, Jr., dissents and votes to reverse in an opinion in which Judges Kaye and Alexander concur.