Case Name: PANTUSO MOTORS, INC., Alfred D. Pantuso, Sr., and Judith Pantuso, Respondents v. CORESTATES BANK, N.A., Successor-In-Interest to Third National Bank & Trust Company of Scranton, Petitioner; Pantuso Motors, Inc., Alfred D. Pantuso, Sr., and Judith Pantuso, Petitioners v. Corestates Bank, N.A., Successor-In-Interest to Third National Bank & Trust Company of Scranton, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2001-08-22
Citations: 779 A.2d 1142
Docket Number: 
Parties: PANTUSO MOTORS, INC., Alfred D. Pantuso, Sr., and Judith Pantuso, Respondents v. CORESTATES BANK, N.A., Successor-In-Interest to Third National Bank & Trust Company of Scranton, Petitioner. Pantuso Motors, Inc., Alfred D. Pantuso, Sr., and Judith Pantuso, Petitioners v. Corestates Bank, N.A., Successor-In-Interest to Third National Bank & Trust Company of Scranton, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 779
Pages: 1142–1142

Head Matter:
PANTUSO MOTORS, INC., Alfred D. Pantuso, Sr., and Judith Pantuso, Respondents v. CORESTATES BANK, N.A., Successor-In-Interest to Third National Bank & Trust Company of Scranton, Petitioner. Pantuso Motors, Inc., Alfred D. Pantuso, Sr., and Judith Pantuso, Petitioners v. Corestates Bank, N.A., Successor-In-Interest to Third National Bank & Trust Company of Scranton, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Aug. 22, 2001.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
AND NOW, this 22nd day of August, 2001, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal, No. 181 M.D. Alloc. Dkt.2000, is granted limited to the following issues:
1. Did the Superior Court err by holding that the statute of limitations applicable to a cause of action under 21 P.S. § 682 begins to run anew with each new request for entry of satisfaction of a mortgage?
2. Did the Superior Court err by holding that a plaintiff who makes multiple requests for entry of satisfaction of a single mortgage may obtain an award of damages under 21 P.S. § 682 for each such request?
The Petition for Allowance of Appeal, No. 183 M.D. Alloc. Dkt.2000, is also granted limited to the following issue:
1. Whether successive demands for satisfaction of an open judgment either revive the initial cause of action or constitute a new and distinct cause of action under 42 Pa.C.S. § 8104?