Case Name: Coral & Stones Unlimited Corp., Appellant, v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds via Marsh S.A., Brussels, et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2005-11-03
Citations: 23 A.D.3d 202
Docket Number: 
Parties: Coral & Stones Unlimited Corp., Appellant, v Certain Underwriters at Lloyds via Marsh S.A., Brussels, et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 23
Pages: 202–202

Head Matter:
Coral & Stones Unlimited Corp., Appellant, v Certain Underwriters at Lloyds via Marsh S.A., Brussels, et al., Respondents.
[803 NYS2d 526]

Opinion:
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Jane Goodman, J.), entered February 2, 2005, dismissing the complaint, and bringing up for review an order, same court and Justice, entered December 22, 2004, which granted defendants' motion for leave to amend their answer to assert an affirmative defense of misrepresentation, and for summary judgment on that defense, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Appeal from the December 22, 2004 order unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the ensuing judgment.
The court properly exercised its discretion in permitting defendants to amend their answer to interpose the defense of misrepresentation (see CPLR 3025 [b]; Masterwear Corp. v Bernard, 3 AD3d 305 [2004]), and in granting summary judgment based on that defense (see Igbara Realty Corp. v New York Prop. Ins. Underwriting Assn., 104 AD2d 258 [1984]). Defendants conclusively established that plaintiff misrepresented a material fact on its application for jewelers block insurance (see Naghavi v New York Life Ins. Co., 260 AD2d 252 [1999]; Aguilar v United States Life Ins. Co. in City of N.Y., 162 AD2d 209 [1990]). Concur—Marlow, J.P., Nardelli, Williams, Sweeny and McGuire, JJ.