Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Rodney O. DYSART, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2015-09-15
Citations: 470 S.W.3d 409
Docket Number: No. ED 102128
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Rodney O. DYSART, Appellant.
Judges: Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Patricia L. Cohen, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 470
Pages: 409–409

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Rodney O. DYSART, Appellant.
No. ED 102128
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
Filed: September 15, 2015
Casey A. Taylor, Assistant Public Defender, Woodrail Centre, 1000 W. Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203, for appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.
Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Patricia L. Cohen, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Rodney Dysart (Defendant) appeals the judgment of conviction entered after a jury found him guilty of stealing a motor vehicle. Defendant claims the trial court erred in overruling his motions for judgments of acquittal at the close of the State's evidence and the close of all evidence and convicting him of stealing a motor vehicle because the State produced insufficient evidence to establish the requisite mental state.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court's decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).