Case Name: Washington Mutual Bank, F.A., Appellee, v. Wallace, Appellant, et al.
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2012-12-05
Citations: 134 Ohio St. 3d 359
Docket Number: Nos. 2011-1693 and 2011-1694
Parties: Washington Mutual Bank, F.A., Appellee, v. Wallace, Appellant, et al.
Judges: O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 134
Pages: 359–359

Head Matter:
Washington Mutual Bank, F.A., Appellee, v. Wallace, Appellant, et al.
[Cite as Washington Mut. Bank, F.A. v. Wallace, 134 Ohio St.3d 359, 2012-Ohio-5495.]
(Nos. 2011-1693 and 2011-1694
Submitted December 4, 2012
Decided December 5, 2012.)
Thompson Hiñe, L.L.P., Scott A. King, and Terry W. Posey Jr., for appellee.
Andrew M. Engel, for appellant, Betty Wallace.

Opinion:
{¶ 1} The certified-conflict question is answered in the negative. The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with Fed. Home Loan Mtge. Corp. v. Schwartzwald, 134 Ohio St.3d 13, 2012-Ohio-5017, 979 N.E.2d 1214.
O'Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.