Case Name: Henry Gawthrop et al., Appellants, v. James D. Leary, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1882-06-13
Citations: 89 N.Y. 622
Docket Number: 
Parties: Henry Gawthrop et al., Appellants, v. James D. Leary, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 89
Pages: 622–622

Head Matter:
Henry Gawthrop et al., Appellants, v. James D. Leary, Respondent.
(Submitted June 2, 1882 ;
decided June 13, 1882.)
The General Term reversed the judgment in this action upon the facts, holding that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict, but did not order a new trial.
The court here say: “An examination of the record leads us to think that should have been done. (Goodman v. Conklin, 85 N. Y. 21.) It cannot be said that on a new trial a recovery would be impossible.”
Albert A. Abbott for appeHants.
John Berry for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam
opinion for modifying judgment by ordering a new trial.
All concur, except Tracy, J., absent.
Judgment accordingly.