Case Name: Samuel D. Pearce et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. A. W. McClanahan et al., Defendants in Error
Court: Supreme Court of Missouri
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1872-07
Citations: 50 Mo. 267
Docket Number: 
Parties: Samuel D. Pearce et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. A. W. McClanahan et al., Defendants in Error.
Judges: The other judges concur.
Reporter: Missouri Reports
Volume: 50
Pages: 267–267

Head Matter:
Samuel D. Pearce et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. A. W. McClanahan et al., Defendants in Error.
1.. Practice, civil — Motion to strike out — Final judgment. — The action of the • Circuit Court in sustaining a motion to strike out plaintiff’s petition, is not a final judgment from which a writ of error lies.
Error to Bates Circuit Court.
Bogges and Sloan, for plaintiffs in error.
Wm. Page, for defendants in error.

Opinion:
Adams, Judge,
delivered the opinion of the court.
This was an action by attachment. After commencing their suit plaintiffs filed an amended.petition, and the defendant filed a motion to strike it out, which motion was sustained and a bill of exceptions filed. The defendants have filed a motion to dismiss the writ of error, because there was no final judgment. The action of the Circuit Court in sustaining the motion to strike out was not a final judgment from which a writ of error lies.
The writ of error is dismissed.
The other judges concur.