Case Name: Lawrence Lee JONES, Appellant/Petitioner, v. Adro JOHNSON, Supt., Santa Rosa Correctional Institution, Petitioner/Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1999-08-25
Citations: 738 So. 2d 530
Docket Number: Nos. 99-1139, 99-1363
Parties: Lawrence Lee JONES, Appellant/Petitioner, v. Adro JOHNSON, Supt., Santa Rosa Correctional Institution, Petitioner/Respondent.
Judges: WEBSTER, DAVIS and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 738
Pages: 530–530

Head Matter:
Lawrence Lee JONES, Appellant/Petitioner, v. Adro JOHNSON, Supt., Santa Rosa Correctional Institution, Petitioner/Respondent.
Nos. 99-1139, 99-1363.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Aug. 25, 1999.
Lawrence Lee Jones, pro se, appellant/petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Donna M. LaPlante, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for appel-lee/respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In these consolidated proceedings, Lawrence Lee Jones petitions for certiorari review of an order denying his petition for writ of mandamus, and appeals a provision of the same order finding, pursuant to section 944.279, Florida Statutes (1997), that the petition was frivolous and thus subjects Jones to disciplinary action by the Department of Corrections.
We conclude that the circuit court did not depart from the essential requirements of law when it denied the petition for writ of mandamus, and therefore deny the petition for writ of certiorari. However, although the circuit court correctly found that Jones' claim lacked merit, we cannot agree with its conclusion that the claim was so facially devoid of merit as to be frivolous. See generally Hay v. Moore, 728 So.2d 806 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). We therefore reverse the portion of the circuit court's order finding that the petition below was frivolous.
WEBSTER, DAVIS and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.