Case Name: Eugene M. HARRIS, Petitioner, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, Respondent, C & P Telephone Company, Intervenor
Court: District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Decision Date: 1994-09-28
Citations: 648 A.2d 674
Docket Number: No. 90-AA-657
Parties: Eugene M. HARRIS, Petitioner, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, Respondent, C & P Telephone Company, Intervenor.
Judges: Before WAGNER, Chief Judge; FERREN, TERRY, STEADMAN, SCHWELB, FARRELL, KING, and SULLIVAN, Associate Judges.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 648
Pages: 674–674

Head Matter:
Eugene M. HARRIS, Petitioner, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, Respondent, C & P Telephone Company, Intervenor.
No. 90-AA-657.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Sept. 28, 1994.
Before WAGNER, Chief Judge; FERREN, TERRY, STEADMAN, SCHWELB, FARRELL, KING, and SULLIVAN, Associate Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
On consideration of respondent's petition for rehearing en bane, petitioner's opposition thereto, the motion of respondent for leave to file reply to opposition to petition, the lodged memorandum, and the petition of intervenor for rehearing en banc, it is
ORDERED that the motion of respondent for leave to file reply to opposition to petition is granted and the Clerk is directed to file the lodged memorandum of respondent. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the petitions for rehearing en banc are denied as moot.