Case Name: COOK, dba Gresham Health Center Nurse Practitioner Clinic, Petitioner, v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION DEPARTMENT, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1987-09-16
Citations: 87 Or. App. 486
Docket Number: WCD 6-1985; CA A38782
Parties: COOK, dba Gresham Health Center Nurse Practitioner Clinic, Petitioner, v. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION DEPARTMENT, Respondent.
Judges: Before Warden, Presiding Judge, and Van Hoomissen and Young, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 87
Pages: 486–487

Head Matter:
Submitted on petitioner’s petition for reconsideration filed July 28 of former opinion (85 Or App 219,736 P2d 230 (1987)) filed May 1;
reconsideration allowed, rule upheld September 16,
reconsideration denied December 18, 1987,
petition for review allowed January 20, 1988 (305 Or 21)
COOK, dba Gresham Health Center Nurse Practitioner Clinic, Petitioner, v. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION DEPARTMENT, Respondent.
(WCD 6-1985; CA A38782)
742 P2d 714
Before Warden, Presiding Judge, and Van Hoomissen and Young, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
In this challenge to a rule of the Workers' Compensation Department brought under ORS 183.400, petitioner seeks review of our decision, which "affirmed" without opinion. Cook v. Workers' Compensation Dept., 85 Or App 219, 736 P2d 230 (1987). We consider the petition for review as one for reconsideration. ORAP 10.10. We allow reconsideration and uphold the rule.
A challenge to an administrative rule in this court is an original proceeding, and our determination of the rule's validity should, generally, be by written opinion. Cook v. Workers' Compensation Dept., 79 Or App 21, 717 P2d 658, rev den 301 Or 666 (1986).
We have considered petitioner's arguments challenging the validity of OAR 436-10-050 and find them to be without merit.
Reconsideration allowed; rule upheld.