Case Name: Joseph FURSTACE and Joseph Galuszka, Appellants, v. Allan M. MIGDALL and James Massaro, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2014-10-24
Citations: 161 So. 3d 559
Docket Number: No. 5D13-2285
Parties: Joseph FURSTACE and Joseph Galuszka, Appellants, v. Allan M. MIGDALL and James Massaro, Appellees.
Judges: PALMER, EVANDER, and BERGER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 161
Pages: 559–559

Head Matter:
Joseph FURSTACE and Joseph Galuszka, Appellants, v. Allan M. MIGDALL and James Massaro, Appellees.
No. 5D13-2285.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Oct. 24, 2014.
John M. Bringardner and Mason B. Binkley, of Lewis, Brisbois, Bisgaard & Smith, LLP, Tampa, for Appellants.
Carl F. Sehoeppl, of Schoeppl & Burke, P.A., Boca Raton, for Appellee Allan M. Migdall.
No Appearance for Appellee James Massaro.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Joseph Furstace and Joseph Galuszka appeal from an order granting Allan Mig-dall's motion to dismiss their second amended complaint. We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The trial court's order did not reflect that the dismissal was "with prejudice," nor did it otherwise suggest that Appellants were precluded from seeking relief under an alternative theory. See Jim Macon Bldg. Contractors v. Lake Cnty., 763 So.2d 1223, 1225 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000); EIR, Inc. v. Elec. Molding Corp., 540 So.2d 260 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PALMER, EVANDER, and BERGER, JJ., concur.