Case Name: Silverius Koellhoffer, Respondent and Appellant, v. Henry Hillebrand, Appellant, and Charles H. Schneider et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Others
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1913-02-04
Citations: 207 N.Y. 701
Docket Number: 
Parties: Silverius Koellhoffer, Respondent and Appellant, v. Henry Hillebrand, Appellant, and Charles H. Schneider et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Others.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 207
Pages: 701–702

Head Matter:
Silverius Koellhoffer, Respondent and Appellant, v. Henry Hillebrand, Appellant, and Charles H. Schneider et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Others.
Koellhoffer v. Hillebrand, 144 App. Div. 915, affirmed.
(Argued January 15, 1913;
decided February 4, 1913.)
Appeal, by defendant appellant, from so much of a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered May 19,1911, as affirmed as against him a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee in an action for deceit. Appeal by plaintiff from so much of the order of said Appellate Division, entered April 28, 1911, as reversed, as to the defendants respondents, the said judgment in favor of plaintiff and granted a new trial as to them.
Fred L. Gross and George W. McKenzie for plaintiff, respondent and appellant.
Joab H. Banton for defendant appellant and for defendants respondents.

Opinion:
Judgment as against appellant Hillebrand affirmed, with .costs; order granting a new trial to defendants respondents affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against plaintiff appellant on the stipulation, with costs in all courts; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase, Collin and Hogan, JJ.