Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Robert FELLOWS, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1979-10-01
Citations: 588 S.W.2d 211
Docket Number: No. KCD 30250
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Robert FELLOWS, Appellant.
Judges: Before WASSERSTROM, C. J., and WELBORN and MURPHY, Special Judges.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 588
Pages: 211–211

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Robert FELLOWS, Appellant.
No. KCD 30250.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Oct. 1, 1979.
Clifford A. Cohen, Public Defender, Kansas City, Kevin R. Locke, Gary L. Gardner, Asst. Public Defenders, for appellant.
John D. Ashcroft, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.
Before WASSERSTROM, C. J., and WELBORN and MURPHY, Special Judges.

Opinion:
WASSERSTROM, Chief Judge.
Defendant was convicted by a jury of forcible rape, robbery in the first degree, and burglary in the first degree. On this appeal, he assigns as his sole Point Relied Upon that the jury panel was improperly selected.
The record shows that the manner of jury selection permitted women the option of declining to serve. That procedure was condemned as unconstitutional in Duren v. Missouri, 439 U.S. 357, 99 S.Ct. 664, 58 L.Ed.2d 579 (1979). The Attorney General, however, seeks to distinguish Duren on the ground that defendant did not develop statistical evidence of a discriminatory result in 1978, the year of trial, parallel to that for 1976 which was shown in Duren.
That attempted distinction has been rejected by this court in a series of cases, the most recent of which are State v. Donahue, 585 S.W.2d 160, 1979, and State v. Hawkins, 582 S.W.2d 333 (Mo.App.1979). The Attorney General insists those cases were wrongly decided. We nevertheless remain of the same opinion and adhere to the view stated in the cases cited.
Reversed and remanded for new trial.
All concur.