Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luther VEREEN, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-04-27
Citations: 375 F. App'x 340
Docket Number: No. 09-8048
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luther VEREEN, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 375
Pages: 340–341

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luther VEREEN, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-8048.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
.Submitted: April 22, 2010.
Decided: April 27, 2010.
Luther Vereen, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Luther Vereen, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Vereen, No. 4:03-cr-00271-CWH-1 (D.S.C. Aug. 10, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.