Case Name: Agnes Mary SOBOL, Appellant, v. Robert SOBOL, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1966-10-11
Citations: 191 So. 2d 68
Docket Number: No. 66-67
Parties: Agnes Mary SOBOL, Appellant, v. Robert SOBOL, Appellee.
Judges: Before HENDRY, C. J., and PEARSON and BARKDULL, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 191
Pages: 68–68

Head Matter:
Agnes Mary SOBOL, Appellant, v. Robert SOBOL, Appellee.
No. 66-67.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
Oct. 11, 1966.
Rehearing Denied Nov. 8, 1966.
Thomas A. Testa, Miami, for appellant.
Freed & Weill and Richard A. Beiley, Miami, for appellee.
Before HENDRY, C. J., and PEARSON and BARKDULL, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on authority of Morrison v. Morrison, Fla.App.1960, 122 So.2d 199, 201, wherein the court states: "It is settled principle of law in this state that a court of equity possesses no power to go back and grant a new right, or impose a new duty not adjudicated in its former decree after it has become final and absolute." See also McEachin v. McEachin, Fla.App.1963, 154 So.2d 894.