Case Name: GLASPEY, Respondent, v. MATTSON, Defendant, and STATE ACCIDENT INSURANCE FUND, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1981-10-12
Citations: 54 Or. App. 322
Docket Number: No. 288-784, CA 19230
Parties: GLASPEY, Respondent, v. MATTSON, Defendant, and STATE ACCIDENT INSURANCE FUND, Appellant.
Judges: Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Roberts and Young, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 54
Pages: 322–322

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted May 29,
affirmed October 12, 1981
GLASPEY, Respondent, v. MATTSON, Defendant, and STATE ACCIDENT INSURANCE FUND, Appellant.
(No. 288-784, CA 19230)
634 P2d 787
Darrell E. Bewley, Appellate Counsel, State Accident Insurance Fund, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were K. R. Maloney, General Counsel, and James A. Blevins, Chief Trial Counsel, State Accident Insurance Fund, Salem.
Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, William F. Gary, Solicitor General, and Al J. Laue, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Roberts and Young, Judges.
PER CURIAM.
See Satterfield v. Satterfield, 54 Or App 184, 634 P2d 787 (1981).
Gillette, P. J., specially concurring.

Opinion:
GILLETTE, P. J.,
specially concurring.
I agree that our decision in this case is controlled by Satterfield. But for Satterfield, I would reverse this case for the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in that case.
Young, J., joins in this specially concurring opinion.