Case Name: CITY OF TRENTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT v. FOWLER-THORNE COMPANY, A CORPORATION, AND SEABOARD SURETY COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1960-04-25
Citations: 32 N.J. 256
Docket Number: 
Parties: CITY OF TRENTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT v. FOWLER-THORNE COMPANY, A CORPORATION, AND SEABOARD SURETY COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 32
Pages: 256–256

Head Matter:
CITY OF TRENTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT v. FOWLER-THORNE COMPANY, A CORPORATION, AND SEABOARD SURETY COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Argued April 5, 1960
Decided April 25, 1960.
Mr. Richard J. Casey argued the cause for the defendant-appellant.
Mr. Harvey L. Stern argued the cause for the plaintiff-respondent {Mr. Louis C. Josephson, attorney).

Opinion:
Pee Oueiam.
We think it unnecessary to decide whether the individual commissioner had authority to institute the action or whether defendant may inquire into the question. We agree with the majority opinion of the Appellate Division that in any event the issue was eliminated by ratification. The question whether the 6 or 16 3'"ear statute of limitations applies need not be considered.
The judgment is affirmed.
For affirmance—Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Burling, Eranois, Proctor, Hall and Sci-iettino—6.
For reversal—Hone.