Case Name: HELEN SOBOL, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CHELSEA HOTEL CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1948-10-11
Citations: 1 N.J. 13
Docket Number: 
Parties: HELEN SOBOL, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CHELSEA HOTEL CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 1
Pages: 13–14

Head Matter:
HELEN SOBOL, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CHELSEA HOTEL CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Argued September 27, 1948
Decided October 11, 1948.
Mr. Max L. Rosenstein argued the cause for the plaintiff-.appellant.
Mr. Mamñce Y. Cole argued the cause for the defendant-respondent (Messrs. Cole & Cole, attorneys).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This is an appeal from an order of the former Supreme Court at the Atlantic County Circuit, opening e,n interlocutory judgment entered against the defendant by default, and permitting it to appear and defend upon terms.
An appeal, however, lies only from a final judgment. The order thus sought to be reviewed does not fall within the category of a final judgment and is, therefore, not appealable. R. S. 2:27-349. Vide Farmland Dairies v. Van Tol, 132 N. J. L. 298, aff'd 133 Id. 313; Matthews v. Public Servive Interstate, etc., Co., 130 Id. 495; Chavers v. McCall, 127 Id. 595; Kople v. Zalon, 122 Id. 422; Jacquin v. Appelgate, 128 Id. 598; Gaffney v. Illiwgsworth, 90 Id. 490.
The appeal is accordingly dismissed, with costs.
For dismissal of appeal: Chief Justice Vanderbilt and Justices Case, Heher, Oliphant, Wacheneeld, Burling, and Ackerson—7,
Opposed: None.