Case Name: John R. BALELO, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Malcolm BALDRIGE, Secretary of Commerce of the United States, et al., Defendants-Appellants; John R. BALELO, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Malcolm BALDRIGE, Secretary of Commerce of the United States, et al., Defendants, and Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. and Defenders of Wildlife, Inc., Intervenors-Defendants-Appellants; UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. $50,178.80, THE MONETARY VALUE OF 57 TONS OF TUNA, Defendant, and Gladiator Fishing, Inc., Claimant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1983-05-19
Citations: 706 F.2d 937
Docket Number: Nos. 81-5806, 81-5807 and 82-5433
Parties: John R. BALELO, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Malcolm BALDRIGE, Secretary of Commerce of the United States, et al., Defendants-Appellants. John R. BALELO, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Malcolm BALDRIGE, Secretary of Commerce of the United States, et al., Defendants, and Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. and Defenders of Wildlife, Inc., Intervenors-Defendants-Appellants. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. $50,178.80, THE MONETARY VALUE OF 57 TONS OF TUNA, Defendant, and Gladiator Fishing, Inc., Claimant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 706
Pages: 937–938

Head Matter:
John R. BALELO, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Malcolm BALDRIGE, Secretary of Commerce of the United States, et al., Defendants-Appellants. John R. BALELO, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Malcolm BALDRIGE, Secretary of Commerce of the United States, et al., Defendants, and Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. and Defenders of Wildlife, Inc., Intervenors-Defendants-Appellants. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. $50,178.80, THE MONETARY VALUE OF 57 TONS OF TUNA, Defendant, and Gladiator Fishing, Inc., Claimant-Appellant.
Nos. 81-5806, 81-5807 and 82-5433.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 19, 1983.
Raymond F. Zvetina, Haskins, Nugent, Newnham, Kane & Zvetina, San Diego, Cal., for Balelo.
Donald A. Carr, Washington, D.C., for Klutznick.
Wayne S. Braveman, Tuttle & Taylor, Los Angeles, Cal., for Environmental Defense Fund.
Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, and WRIGHT, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, TANG, SKOPIL, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, FERGUSON, NELSON, CANBY, BOOCHEVER, NORRIS, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that these cases shall be reheard by an en banc panel of the court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignments are hereby withdrawn.