Case Name: Meda Baker, et al. v. Beatrice June FitzGerald
Court: Vermont Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Vermont
Decision Date: 1976-04-06
Citations: 134 Vt. 259
Docket Number: No. 171-75
Parties: Meda Baker, et al. v. Beatrice June FitzGerald
Judges: Present: Barney, C.J., Smith, Daley, Larrow and Billings, JJ.
Reporter: Vermont Reports
Volume: 134
Pages: 259–259

Head Matter:
Meda Baker, et al. v. Beatrice June FitzGerald
[356 A.2d 220]
No. 171-75
Present: Barney, C.J., Smith, Daley, Larrow and Billings, JJ.
Opinion Filed April 6, 1976
Thomas J. Pressly of the office of J. Fred Carbine, Jr., Rut-land, for Plaintiff.
Eugene Rakow, Vermont Legal Aid, Inc., Rutland, for Defendant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This appeal arises out of an automobile collision between vehicles operated by one of the plaintiffs and the defendant. The trial court found in favor of the defendant and entered judgment accordingly. The sole ground of the plaintiff's appeal is a factual one. The trial court, as the judge of the credibility of witnesses, determined the issue presented and resolved the conflicting evidence against the plaintiffs. Wells v. Village of Orleans, Inc., 132 Vt. 216, 315 A.2d 463 (1974). The evidence in the transcript supports the court's findings and conclusions.
Judgment affirmed.