Case Name: Juan Carlos OCASIO, Debtor-Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK SUPPORT COLLECTION UNIT, Department of Child Support Services SFDA-FSB, Creditors-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-02-15
Citations: 167 F. App'x 269
Docket Number: No. 05-4973-bk
Parties: Juan Carlos OCASIO, Debtor-Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK SUPPORT COLLECTION UNIT, Department of Child Support Services SFDA-FSB, Creditors-Appellees.
Judges: PRESENT: Hon. DENNIS JACOBS, Hon. RICHARD C. WESLEY, and Hon. JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Bankruptcy Reporter
Volume: 340
Pages: 269–269

Head Matter:
Juan Carlos OCASIO, Debtor-Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK SUPPORT COLLECTION UNIT, Department of Child Support Services SFDA-FSB, Creditors-Appellees.
No. 05-4973-bk.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Feb. 15, 2006.
Juan Carlos Ocasio, pro se, New York, NY, (on submission) for Appellant.
Beryl M. Crumpton, (Warren H. Colod-ner, on the brief), Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Nicholson Graham, New York, NY, (on submission) for Appellee, of counsel.
PRESENT: Hon. DENNIS JACOBS, Hon. RICHARD C. WESLEY, and Hon. JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judges.
The Honorable John R. Gibson, United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
SUMMARY ORDER
Juan Carlos Ocasio appeals the final order issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Daniels, /.), affirming the dismissal of a complaint filed in an adversary proceeding commenced by Ocasio in his Chapter 13 bankruptcy proceeding in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (Black-shear, /.). We assume that the parties are familiar with the facts, the procedural history, and the scope of the issues presented on appeal.
We AFFIRM the district court decision substantially for the reasons given therein. See Ocasio v. City of N.Y. Support Collection Unit (In re Ocasio), No. 04-cv-9586, 2005 WL 1529696, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12839 (S.D.N.Y.2005). The Appellant is to bear costs.