Case Name: Jimmy MULLINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE CITY, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-02-22
Citations: 366 F. App'x 461
Docket Number: No. 09-1193
Parties: Jimmy MULLINS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE CITY, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 366
Pages: 461–462

Head Matter:
Jimmy MULLINS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE CITY, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 09-1193.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 27, 2010.
Decided: Feb. 22, 2010.
John B. Stolarz, The Stolarz Law Firm, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. George A. Nilson, City Solicitor, Gwen B. Tromley, Assistant Solicitor, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jimmy Mullins appeals the district court's orders denying his motion for leave to amend his complaint and granting the Appellee's motion for summary judgment on Mullins' claim of age discrimination. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mullins v. Mayor, No. 1:07-cv-02690-CCB, 2009 WL 248041 (D.Md. Jan. 20, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.