Case Name: SAMUEL STIEFFEL, RESPONDENT, v. ROBERTA P. DAVENPORT, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1925-01-19
Citations: 101 N.J.L. 234
Docket Number: 
Parties: SAMUEL STIEFFEL, RESPONDENT, v. ROBERTA P. DAVENPORT, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 101
Pages: 234–234

Head Matter:
SAMUEL STIEFFEL, RESPONDENT, v. ROBERTA P. DAVENPORT, APPELLANT.
Argued October 28, 1924
Decided January 19, 1925.
Por the appellant, Clarence L. Cole.
Por the respondent, Paul M. Salsburg.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The appeal is directed at the- correctness of the refusal of the trial court to nonsuit and direct a verdict in favor of appellant, and to the alleged error of the court in submitting the cause to the jury upon a theory not supported by the pleadings. -The latter ground is not properly before us, because not raised by proper exception or otherwise in the trial court.
There was no error in the trial court's refusal to- nonsuit or direct a verdict, because there was evidence- requiring a submission of the cause to the jury.
The judgment below is affirmed, with costs.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.