Case Name: BANK OF NEW ORLEANS AND TRUST COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The OIL SCREW TRACY MARIE, etc., et al., Defendants, Lee-Roy Towing, Inc., Intervenor-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1978-09-21
Citations: 580 F.2d 808
Docket Number: No. 78-1624
Parties: BANK OF NEW ORLEANS AND TRUST COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The OIL SCREW TRACY MARIE, etc., et al., Defendants, Lee-Roy Towing, Inc., Intervenor-Appellee.
Judges: Before THORNBERRY, GODBOLD and RUBIN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 580
Pages: 808–808

Head Matter:
BANK OF NEW ORLEANS AND TRUST COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The OIL SCREW TRACY MARIE, etc., et al., Defendants, Lee-Roy Towing, Inc., Intervenor-Appellee.
No. 78-1624
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Sept. 21, 1978.
Robert T. Wakefield, New Orleans, La., for plaintiff-appellant.
Kierr, Gainsburgh, Benjamin, Fallon & Lewis, Lawrence S. Kullman, New Orleans, La., for intervenor-appellee.
Before THORNBERRY, GODBOLD and RUBIN, Circuit Judges.
Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
We affirm on the opinion of the district court, 455 F.Supp. 78, with the following additional comments.
The evidence adequately supports the findings that Lee-Roy Towing was a special agent and not a general agent and that it was a real party in interest. We do not understand the court to have held that the presumption of 46 U.S.C. § 971 is irrebuttable; rather it held that the presumption had not been rebutted by appellant's contention that Lee-Roy was a general agent. There is no merit to the contention that the overall purpose of the Ship Mortgage Act, 46 U.S.C. § 911 et seq., and the Maritime Lien Act of 1920, 46 U.S.C. § 971 et seq. requires that the lien for crew wages not be given its usual superiority in this case.
AFFIRMED.