Case Name: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kearns
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1993-04-21
Citations: 66 Ohio St. 3d 140
Docket Number: No. 92-2501
Parties: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kearns.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 66
Pages: 140–141

Head Matter:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kearns.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Kearns (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 140.]
(No. 92-2501
Submitted February 2, 1993
Decided April 21, 1993.)
J. Warren Bettis, Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Respondent has failed to show why he should not receive discipline comparable to that imposed by the Supreme Court of Colorado. Accordingly, we hereby suspend respondent from the practice of law in Ohio for the duration of his Colorado suspension. However, before respondent will be reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio, he must present evidence that he has made the restitution ordered by the Colorado Supreme Court, as required by Gov. Bar R. V(10)(E)(1). Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.