Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David GRIFFIN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-10-18
Citations: 203 F. App'x 148
Docket Number: No. 05-50851
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David GRIFFIN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: T.G. NELSON, W. FLETCHER and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 203
Pages: 148–149

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David GRIFFIN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-50851.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 16, 2006.
Filed Oct. 18, 2006.
Becky S. Walker, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Criminal Division, Los An-geles, CA, Robert C. Stacy, II, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Riverside, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Kathryn A. Young, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: T.G. NELSON, W. FLETCHER and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
David Griffin appeals from the 46-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Griffin contends that the sentence imposed was unreasonable because the district court failed to appropriately consider the sentencing factors. A review of the record reflects that the district court did take into account the applicable sentencing factors, including the nature and circumstances of the offense and the history and characteristics of the defendant.
Because the sentence imposed is not unreasonable, we affirm. See United States v. Plouffe, 445 F.3d 1126, 1131 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. - , 126 S.Ct. 2314, 164 L.Ed.2d 832 (2006); United States v. Sylvester Norman Knows His Gun, 438 F.3d 913, 918 (9th Cir.2006).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.