Case Name: Anthony GRANDISON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-03-23
Citations: 171 F. App'x 998
Docket Number: No. 05-6999
Parties: Anthony GRANDISON, Petitioner—Appellant, v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent—Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 171
Pages: 998–998

Head Matter:
Anthony GRANDISON, Petitioner—Appellant, v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent—Appellee.
No. 05-6999.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 8, 2006.
Decided: March 23, 2006.
Anthony Grandison, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Grandison, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Grandison v. United States Parole Comm'n, No. CA-04-3814-AW (D. Md. May 11, 18, & 25, 2005). We deny the motion for a certificate of appealability and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED