Case Name: Linda I. VALERINO, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Dora M. Alvarado; Jeffrey L. Bohn; Margarita V. Serna; Tam M. Wyatt, and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., in his official capacity as United States Attorney General, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-09-19
Citations: 539 F. App'x 256
Docket Number: No. 13-1390
Parties: Linda I. VALERINO, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Dora M. Alvarado; Jeffrey L. Bohn; Margarita V. Serna; Tam M. Wyatt, and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., in his official capacity as United States Attorney General, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 539
Pages: 256–257

Head Matter:
Linda I. VALERINO, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Dora M. Alvarado; Jeffrey L. Bohn; Margarita V. Serna; Tam M. Wyatt, and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., in his official capacity as United States Attorney General, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 13-1390.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 29, 2013.
Decided: Sept. 19, 2013.
Linda I. Valerino, Appellant Pro Se. Anna Elizabeth Cross, Office of the United States Attorney, Kevin J. Mikolashek, R. Joseph Sher, Lauren Anne Wetzler, Assistant United States Attorneys, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Linda I. Valerino appeals the district court's order granting Defendant's motion to dismiss and motion for summary judgment in this employment discrimination case arising from Valerino's employment with the United States Marshals Service. We have carefully reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its thorough opinion. Valerino v. Holder, No. 1:11-cv-01124-GBL-JFA (E.D.Va. Feb. 20, 2018). We deny Valerino's motion for leave to file exhibits. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.