Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Kenneth J. Hall, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2008-12-31
Citations: 57 A.D.3d 1471
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kenneth J. Hall, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 57
Pages: 1471–1471

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kenneth J. Hall, Appellant.
[869 NYS2d 834]

Opinion:
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of rape in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.35 [2]), defendant contends that the presentence report should be amended because, according to defendant, it contains inaccurate assertions and unsupported speculation that "are likely to prejudice [defendant] for years to come" (see generally People v Harrington, 3 AD3d 737, 739 [2004]). Defendant failed to preserve that contention for our review, and we decline to exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present — Centra, J.E, Peradotto, Green and Pine, JJ.