Case Name: Leda GOLDENBERG, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Stuart GOLDENBERG, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-12-26
Citations: 914 S.W.2d 825
Docket Number: No. 68287
Parties: Leda GOLDENBERG, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Stuart GOLDENBERG, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and DOWD, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 914
Pages: 825–825

Head Matter:
Leda GOLDENBERG, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Stuart GOLDENBERG, Respondent/Respondent.
No. 68287.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Dec. 26, 1995.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Feb. 7, 1996.
Rosenblum, Goldenhersh, Silverstein & Zafft, P.C., Merle L. Silverstein; Sanford J. Boxerman, Clayton, for appellant.
Eisen, Gillespie & Hilton, Lawrence G. Gillespie, Webster Groves, for respondent.
Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and DOWD, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Wife appeals from the portions of the dissolution decree denying her request for maintenance. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the trial court are not erroneous; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Judgment affirmed.