Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mary Lee DAVIS, aka Mary Lee Pickens, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-12-14
Citations: 213 F. App'x 547
Docket Number: No. 06-50032
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mary Lee DAVIS, aka Mary Lee Pickens, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: REINHARDT, KOZINSKI, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 213
Pages: 547–548

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mary Lee DAVIS, aka Mary Lee Pickens, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-50032.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Dec. 6, 2006.
Filed Dec. 14, 2006.
Becky S. Walker, Esq., USLA — Office of the U.S. Attorney Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA Sheri N. Pym, Esq., USR— Office of the U.S. Attorney, Riverside, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Karen L. Landau, Esq., Oakland, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: REINHARDT, KOZINSKI, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
Mary Lee Davis appeals her conviction under 21 U.S.C. § 856(a)(2) and the criminal forfeiture of her property under 21 U.S.C. § 853(a). In her appeal, and for the first time, Davis asserts that she did not voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently waive her Sixth Amendment right to a trial by jury. See United States v. Duarte-Higareda, 113 F.3d 1000, 1002 (9th Cir.1997). Because the district court has not yet considered this question, and because the parties have agreed that it would be appropriate to remand so that it may do so, we REMAND the case to the district court for whatever further action it may deem appropriate.
REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.