Case Name: James W. INGRAM, Jr., Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1979-04-05
Citations: 369 So. 2d 948
Docket Number: No. 53929
Parties: James W. INGRAM, Jr., Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: ENGLAND, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 369
Pages: 948–948

Head Matter:
James W. INGRAM, Jr., Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 53929.
Supreme Court of Florida.
April 5, 1979.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Beth C. Weitzner, Asst. Public Defender, Miami, for petitioner.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and James H. Greason, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ. Upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by article V, section (3)(b)(3), Florida Constitution. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.
It is so ordered.
ENGLAND, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur.