Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony Keith HART, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-04-26
Citations: 95 F. App'x 897
Docket Number: No. 02-50124; D.C. No. CR-01-00292-RMT-01
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Anthony Keith HART, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 95
Pages: 897–898

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Anthony Keith HART, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 02-50124.
D.C. No. CR-01-00292-RMT-01.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 22, 2004.
Decided April 26, 2004.
Miriam A. Krinsky, Asst. U.S. Atty., Carole C. Peterson, USLA — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Tina Long Rippy, Whittier, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before O’SCANNLAIN, RYMER and BEA, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Anthony Keith Hart appeals his conviction and 12-month plus one-day sentence imposed after his jury trial for possession of a firearm and ammunition by a person convicted of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(9).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Hart has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Hart has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.