Case Name: William HAMILTON, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Warden Sara REVELL, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-09-30
Citations: 540 F. App'x 213
Docket Number: No. 13-6843
Parties: William HAMILTON, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Warden Sara REVELL, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 540
Pages: 213–213

Head Matter:
William HAMILTON, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Warden Sara REVELL, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 13-6843.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 26, 2013.
Decided: Sept. 30, 2013.
William Hamilton, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
William Hamilton, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2013) petition and his Rule 59 motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hamilton v. Revel, No. 5:12-hc-02159-FL (E.D.N.C. Dec. 21, 2012; May 8, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.