Case Name: Massimus Perini, Respondent, v. Francis J. Schmyg, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1898-10
Citations: 24 Misc. 761
Docket Number: 
Parties: Massimus Perini, Respondent, v. Francis J. Schmyg, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 24
Pages: 761–762

Head Matter:
Massimus Perini, Respondent, v. Francis J. Schmyg, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court, ninth district, borough of Manhattan, New York city.
A. J. Wise, for appellant.
Wahle & Stone, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The owner having discharged the lien by deposit with the county clerk, no order for its continuance Was necessary in order to support a foreclosure action instituted after the expiration of a year from the date of filing the lien. Hafker v. Henry, 5 App. Div. 258. The judgment also was not so erroneous in form as to call for a reversal. Egan v. Laemmle, 5 Misc. Rep. 244. .
Present: Beekman, P. J., Gildersleeve and Giegerich, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.