Case Name: William MOTLEY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-04-03
Citations: 45 S.W.3d 483
Docket Number: No. ED 77247
Parties: William MOTLEY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before MARY K. HOFF, C.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and ROBERT O. SNYDER, Sr J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 45
Pages: 483–483

Head Matter:
William MOTLEY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 77247.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
April 3, 2001.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 10, 2001.
Application for Transfer Denied June 26, 2001.
Jacqueline K. McGreevy, Louisiana, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Adriane D. Crouse, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before MARY K. HOFF, C.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and ROBERT O. SNYDER, Sr J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, William Motley, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties and find that the motion court's judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).