Case Name: Anilus BELHOMME, Appellant, v. Gisleine BERTRAND, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-11-22
Citations: 774 So. 2d 760
Docket Number: No. 3D00-2153
Parties: Anilus BELHOMME, Appellant, v. Gisleine BERTRAND, Appellee.
Judges: Before GODERICH and SORONDO, JJ., and NESBITT, Senior Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 774
Pages: 760–760

Head Matter:
Anilus BELHOMME, Appellant, v. Gisleine BERTRAND, Appellee.
No. 3D00-2153.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 22, 2000.
Langbein & Langbein and Evan J. Langbein, Aventura; David C. Miller; James M. Schiff, Miami, for appellant.
Brian R. Hersh and Amie Tamayo, Miami, for appellee.
Before GODERICH and SORONDO, JJ., and NESBITT, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Because the plaintiff met her burden of showing the essential elements necessary for the issuance of a temporary injunction, namely, "a clear legal right or interest in the subject matter of the suit, the likelihood of irreparable harm because of the unavailability of an adequate remedy at law, and a substantial likelihood of success of the merits," Oxford Int'l Bank & Trust, Ltd. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 374 So.2d 54, 56 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), we affirm the trial court's order.
Affirmed.