Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francisco ALANIZ-DERAS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-06-17
Citations: 137 F. App'x 5
Docket Number: No. 03-10687
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Francisco ALANIZ-DERAS, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: KLEINFELD, TASHIMA, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 137
Pages: 5–6

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Francisco ALANIZ-DERAS, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 03-10687.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 14, 2005.
Decided June 17, 2005.
Michael T. Morrissey, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for PlaintiffAppellee.
Gregory Parzych, Esq., Attorney at Law, Mesa, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: KLEINFELD, TASHIMA, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Francisco Alaniz-Deras appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 22-month sentence for harboring of illegal aliens, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(l)(A)(iii).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Alaniz-Deras has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief has been filed. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief.
Accordingly, we GRANT counsel's motion to withdraw and AFFIRM the district court's judgment.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.