Case Name: Eugene WILSON, d/b/a Eugene Wilson Excavating, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Robert C. NOTHUM and Audrey Nothum, husband and wife, Defendants-Appellants
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1982-06-24
Citations: 637 S.W.2d 292
Docket Number: No. 12132
Parties: Eugene WILSON, d/b/a Eugene Wilson Excavating, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Robert C. NOTHUM and Audrey Nothum, husband and wife, Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: All concur except PREWITT, P. J., re-cused.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 637
Pages: 292–292

Head Matter:
Eugene WILSON, d/b/a Eugene Wilson Excavating, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Robert C. NOTHUM and Audrey Nothum, husband and wife, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 12132.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two.
June 24, 1982.
Motion for Rehearing Overruled and to Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 12, 1982.
Application to Transfer Denied Sept. 13, 1982.
Donald W. Jones and Mark L. McQueary, Jones, Keeter, Karchmer, Nelms & Sullivan, Springfield, for defendants-appellants.
No appearance for plaintiff-respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
A Pulaski County jury found in favor of plaintiff on his petition for damages on a contract to construct a water pond on property owned by defendants, husband and wife, and returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff on the counterclaim of defendants.
The resolution of the conflicting testimony of the parties as to the terms of their oral agreement, the credibility of the witnesses, and the weight to be given testimony, was for the jury. We have reviewed the pleadings and the trial transcript and find there was sufficient evidence to support the jury's verdict. No error of law appears and an opinion would have no prec-edential value.
Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b), V.A.M.R.
All concur except PREWITT, P. J., re-cused.