Case Name: Charlie MATTHEWS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Valerie MURRAY; Dr. Colin Ottey; William Beeman; Greg Flury; Lisa Schindler, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-03-05
Citations: 559 F. App'x 217
Docket Number: No. 13-7993
Parties: Charlie MATTHEWS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Valerie MURRAY; Dr. Colin Ottey; William Beeman; Greg Flury; Lisa Schindler, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 559
Pages: 217–218

Head Matter:
Charlie MATTHEWS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Valerie MURRAY; Dr. Colin Ottey; William Beeman; Greg Flury; Lisa Schindler, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 13-7993.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 27, 2014.
Decided: March 5, 2014.
Charlie Matthews, Appellant Pro Se. Michelle Jacquelyn Marzullo, Richard P. Seitz, Marks, O’Neill, O’Brien, Doherty & Kelly, P.C., Towson, Maryland; Gina Marie Smith, Meyers, Rodbell & Rosenbaum, PA, Riverdale, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Charlie Matthews appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Matthews v. Murray, No. 1:13-cv-00059-RDB, 2013 WL 6383097 (D.Md. Dec. 4, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade quately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.