Case Name: Jeromy BAUTZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2006-05-31
Citations: 932 So. 2d 465
Docket Number: No. 4D06-1790
Parties: Jeromy BAUTZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SHAHOOD, GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 932
Pages: 465–465

Head Matter:
Jeromy BAUTZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D06-1790.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
May 31, 2006.
Jeromy Bautz, Arcadia, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The denial of Bautz's rule 3.800 motion to correct sentence is affirmed without prejudice. Bautz may raise the claim of a violation of the plea agreement in a timely and legally sufficient motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Catlin v. State, 929 So.2d 1087 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); Lee v. State, 637 So.2d 391 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).
SHAHOOD, GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.