Case Name: Jim BLAIR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ted GERBER, Defendant-Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1982-05-04
Citations: 634 S.W.2d 227
Docket Number: No. 43695
Parties: Jim BLAIR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ted GERBER, Defendant-Respondent.
Judges: REINHARD, P. J., and SNYDER and CRIST, JJ., concur.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 634
Pages: 227–227

Head Matter:
Jim BLAIR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ted GERBER, Defendant-Respondent.
No. 43695.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
May 4, 1982.
Rex M. Burlison, O’Fallon, for plaintiff-appellant.
Robert A. Hamilton, St. Louis, for defendant-respondent.

Opinion:
CLEMENS, Senior Judge.
Husband's judgment creditor attempted to attach sale proceeds of land jointly owned by husband-debtor and his wife. On husband's motion the court dissolved the attachment. Plaintiff-creditor appeals; we affirm.
In Flesher v. Carter, 467 S.W.2d 276[1] (Mo.App.1971) we held: "It is clear that if a valid tenancy by the entireties existed the funds would not be subject to garnishment and execution to satisfy a judgment against the wife alone." See also Thummel v. Thummel, 609 S.W.2d 175[4] (Mo.App.1980).
Considering each point raised we find the trial court's judgment is supported by the evidence; further the court did not err in declaring or applying the law. An extended opinion would have no value as precedent. Rule 84.16(b).
Affirmed.
REINHARD, P. J., and SNYDER and CRIST, JJ., concur.