Case Name: CAT 'N FIDDLE, INC., a Florida Corporation, operating and doing business as Cat 'N Fiddle Restaurant and Lounge, Appellant, v. The CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of New York, and Hurst Insurance Agency, a Florida Corporation, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1975-07-22
Citations: 317 So. 2d 120
Docket Number: No. 74-659
Parties: CAT ’N FIDDLE, INC., a Florida Corporation, operating and doing business as Cat ’N Fiddle Restaurant and Lounge, Appellant, v. The CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of New York, and Hurst Insurance Agency, a Florida Corporation, Appellees.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, C. J., PEARSON, J., and DREW, E. HARRIS (Ret.) Associate Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 317
Pages: 120–120

Head Matter:
CAT ’N FIDDLE, INC., a Florida Corporation, operating and doing business as Cat ’N Fiddle Restaurant and Lounge, Appellant, v. The CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of New York, and Hurst Insurance Agency, a Florida Corporation, Appellees.
No. 74-659.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 22, 1975.
Rehearing Denied Sept. 11, 1975.
Richard Karl Goethel, Coral Gables, for appellant.
Wicker, Smith, Pyska, Blomqvist & Dav-ant and Richard Á. Sherman, Miami, for Century Ins. Co-
Knight, Peters, Hoeveler, Pickle, Nie-moeller & Flynn, Jeanne Heyward, Miami, for Hurst Ins. Agency, appellees.
Before BARKDULL, C. J., PEARSON, J., and DREW, E. HARRIS (Ret.) Associate Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The plaintiff appeals from a final judgment entered on a jury verdict in an action which has been the subject of prior appeals in this court and in the Supreme Court of Florida. See Cat 'N Fiddle, Inc. v. Century Insurance Company, Fla.1968, 213 So.2d 701 and Cat 'N Fiddle, Inc. v. Century Insurance Company, Fla.App. 1967, 200 So.2d 208. Our review of the record in the light of the briefs and the argument heard convinces us that the appellant has had a full, complete and fair trial pursuant to the directions of the Supreme Court in the case cited above. Accordingly, the final judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.