Case Name: In the Matter of Leonard W. Krouner, a Disbarred Attorney. Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Petitioner; Leonard W. Krouner, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2017-05-11
Citations: 150 A.D.3d 1466
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Leonard W. Krouner, a Disbarred Attorney. Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Petitioner; Leonard W. Krouner, Respondent.
Judges: McCarthy, J.P., Garry, Rose, Clark and Aarons, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 150
Pages: 1466–1467

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Leonard W. Krouner, a Disbarred Attorney. Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Petitioner; Leonard W. Krouner, Respondent.
[51 NYS3d 910]

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1973, and previously maintained an office for the practice of law in the City of Albany. He presently resides in Oceanside, California.
By order entered May 23, 2003, this Court disbarred respondent and struck his name from the roll of attorneys after he pleaded guilty to three felonies in Supreme Court in Albany County (305 AD2d 932 [2003]). He now moves for reinstatement, for the third time (see 114 AD3d 993 [2014]; 84 AD3d 1585 [2011]). Petitioner opposes the motion.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion, and the papers filed in opposition thereto, and due deliberation having been had thereon, we deny the motion, but without prejudice to the filing of a motion for reinstatement that complies with the requirements set forth in Rules of the Appellate Division, Third Department (22 NYCRR) § 806.16 (a) and Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters (22 NYCRR) § 1240.16. Any such application shall include, among other things, submission of an affidavit in the form of Appendix C to Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters (22 NYCRR) part 1240, such additional documentation as might be required in said form affidavit and proof that respondent has taken and successfully completed the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination no more than one year prior to the date of any future reinstatement motion.
McCarthy, J.P., Garry, Rose, Clark and Aarons, JJ., concur.
Ordered that respondent's motion is denied.