Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bobby N. HOLLAND; Bobby N. Holland, Trustee; Jacquelyn Holland; Rebecca Holland, Defendants-Appellants, Option One Mortgage Corporation, Defendant-Appellee, and H & R Block Mortgage Corporation, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-09-10
Citations: 396 F. App'x 937
Docket Number: No. 09-1636
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bobby N. HOLLAND; Bobby N. Holland, Trustee; Jacquelyn Holland; Rebecca Holland, Defendants-Appellants, Option One Mortgage Corporation, Defendant-Appellee, and H & R Block Mortgage Corporation, Defendant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 396
Pages: 937–938

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bobby N. HOLLAND; Bobby N. Holland, Trustee; Jacquelyn Holland; Rebecca Holland, Defendants-Appellants, Option One Mortgage Corporation, Defendant-Appellee, and H & R Block Mortgage Corporation, Defendant.
No. 09-1636.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 27, 2010.
Decided: Sept. 10, 2010.
Bobby N. Holland, Jacquelyn Holland, Rebecca Holland, Appellants Pro Se. Ivan C. Dale, Jan M. Geht, Teresa E. McLaughlin, Kenneth W. Rosenberg, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC; Joseph H. Nanney, Jr., Kevin J. Stanfield, Wyrick, Robbins, Yates & Ponton, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Bobby N. Holland, Bobby N. Holland as Trustee, Jacquelyn Holland, and Rebecca Holland appeal two district court orders. The first order granted summary to the Government and Option One Mortgage Corporation, reduced various tax liens to judgment, and ordered the sale of real property at 1805 Trinity Road in Raleigh, North Carolina. The second granted the Government's motion to reconsider and amended the amount of the assessments as of September 15, 2008. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Appellants' motion for abeyance and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Holland, 637 F.Supp.2d 315 (E.D.N.C.2009); (filed Aug. 13, 2009 & entered Aug. 14, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.