Case Name: I. AROTSKY, RESPONDENT, v. I. KROPNITSKY, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1925-01-19
Citations: 101 N.J.L. 203
Docket Number: 
Parties: I. AROTSKY, RESPONDENT, v. I. KROPNITSKY, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 101
Pages: 203–203

Head Matter:
I. AROTSKY, RESPONDENT, v. I. KROPNITSKY, APPELLANT.
Submitted November 7, 1924
Decided January 19, 1925.
Eor the respondent, Cohen & Klein.
Eor the appellant, Arthur B. Seymour.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Teen-chard, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.