Case Name: Norman ALLEN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1968-06-25
Citations: 211 So. 2d 590
Docket Number: No. 67-974
Parties: Norman ALLEN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 211
Pages: 590–590

Head Matter:
Norman ALLEN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 67-974.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
June 25, 1968.
Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender, and Jeffrey Michael Cohen, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and David F. Cerf, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By this appeal, the appellant seeks reversal of his conviction for the crime of robbery, following a non-jury trial.
He argues that his conviction must be reversed because it was based upon circumstantial evidence which did not exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence.
The record contains sufficient, competent evidence to support the finding that the accused was the perpetrator of this crime and that his guilt was proven beyond any reasonable hypothesis of innocence. See Head v. State, Fla.1952, 62 So.2d 41; Asher v. State, 90 Fla. 75, 105 So. 140 (1925); Tirko v. State, Fla.App.1962, 138 So.2d 388.
The judgment and sentence be, and the same are, therefore,
Affirmed.