Case Name: Richard LLOYD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2003-05-09
Citations: 844 So. 2d 713
Docket Number: No. 2D02-1774
Parties: Richard LLOYD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: KELLY, J., Concurs.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 844
Pages: 713–715

Head Matter:
Richard LLOYD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D02-1774.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
May 9, 2003.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Andrea Norgard, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deena DeGenova, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appel-lee.

Opinion:
SALCINES, Judge.
Richard Lloyd appeals the habitual offender sentence imposed following a jury trial in which he was found guilty of four drug-related charges. He challenges only his habitual offender sentence arguing that the State failed to provide the requisite evidence to support the habitualization. The State concedes error but maintains that, upon remand, it should be given another opportunity to present evidence that Lloyd qualifies as a habitual offender. Be-. cause the record in the present case is insufficient, and Lloyd did not object to the.inadequacy of the documentation at the sentencing, we reverse and remand for resentencing at which the State will be permitted to present the requisite evidence and the trial court will again be allowed to impose a habitual offender sentence if properly supported. See Sanders v. State, 765 So.2d 161 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
KELLY, J., Concurs.
ALTENBERND, C.J., Concurs specially with an opinion in which KELLY, J., Concurs.