Case Name: James Radcliffe & Sons Company et al., respondents, v. Charles E. Knoble, Jr., et al., appellants
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1933-01-05
Citations: 112 N.J. Eq. 90
Docket Number: 
Parties: James Radcliffe & Sons Company et al., respondents, v. Charles E. Knoble, Jr., et al., appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 112
Pages: 90–90

Head Matter:
James Radcliffe & Sons Company et al., respondents, v. Charles E. Knoble, Jr., et al., appellants.
[Decided January 5th, 1933.]
Mr. James N. Wright and Messrs. Sticlcel & Sticlcel, for the respondents.
Frances Hart, for the appellants.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Bigelow, and reported in 109 N. J. Eq. 309, sub nom. James Radcliffe, &c., Sons Co. v. Borough of Hawthorne.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Brogan, ECeher, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 16.
For reversal — None.