Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. John Edward SCOTT, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-02-19
Citations: 513 F. App'x 402
Docket Number: No. 12-20125
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. John Edward SCOTT, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING, CLEMENT, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 513
Pages: 402–403

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. John Edward SCOTT, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-20125
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Feb. 19, 2013.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Seth Kretzer, Law Offices of Seth Kret-zer, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before KING, CLEMENT, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent John Edward Scott has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Scott has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with coun sel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th CiR. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.