Case Name: WEBSTER v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1925-12-02
Citations: 277 S.W. 698
Docket Number: No. 9606
Parties: WEBSTER v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 277
Pages: 698–699

Head Matter:
WEBSTER v. STATE.
(No. 9606.)
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Dec. 2, 1925.)
Chas. Roach, of Paris, for appellant.
Sam D. Stinson, State’s Atty., of Austin, and Nat Gentry, Jr., Asst. State’s Atty., of Tyler, for the State.

Opinion:
HAWKINS, J.
Appellant was put to trial upon an indictment charging him with assault with intent to murder one T. S. Stites. A conviction for aggravated assault resulted with the punishment fixed at a fine of $50 and 30 days' confinement in the county jail.
The evidence is conflicting: That of the state supports the verdict and judgment; that offered by the defense, if accepted by the jury, would have justified an acquittal. The jury has determined this matter in favor of the state. It is not that character of case in which this court would he authorized to interfere with the judgment.
The record contains no hills of exception complaining of any procedure during the trial. There is what purports to be a hill complaining of a certain paragraph of the court's charge, but it is not approved by the trial judge, and therefore cannot be considered. It has no place in the record. If it had been approved it is in no condition to he considered ; while stating that appellant objected to the portion of the charge at which the criticism is directed, it fails to state that objections thereto in writing were filed' as required by article 658, C. C. P. 1925 (article 735, Vernon's C. C. P.).
Finding no error in the record, the judgment is affirmed.