Case Name: Roy J. NEERING, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent; STATE of Florida, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner, v. Roy J. NEERING, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent; STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Roy J. NEERING, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1963-06-07
Citations: 155 So. 2d 874
Docket Number: Nos. 31865, 31909, 31959
Parties: Roy J. NEERING, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent. STATE of Florida, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner, v. Roy J. NEERING, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent. STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Roy J. NEERING, Respondent.
Judges: THOMAS, DREW, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 155
Pages: 874–879

Head Matter:
Roy J. NEERING, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent. STATE of Florida, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner, v. Roy J. NEERING, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent. STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Roy J. NEERING, Respondent.
Nos. 31865, 31909, 31959.
Supreme Court of Florida
June 7, 1963.
Rehearing Denied July 16, 1963.
Luke G. Galant and Arthur J. Gutman, Jacksonville, for petitioner-respondent and cross-respondent.
Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., and James G. Mahorner, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent-petitioner and cross-petitioner.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The writs of certiorari having been improvidently issued, they should be and are
Discharged.
THOMAS, DREW, O'CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.
ROBERTS, C. J., .and TERRELL and HOBSON (Ret.), JJ., dissent.