Case Name: Kathy DOBBY, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Matthew STECK d/b/a Bondtight Roofing Co., Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1994-03-15
Citations: 874 S.W.2d 514
Docket Number: No. 64185
Parties: Kathy DOBBY, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Matthew STECK d/b/a Bondtight Roofing Co., Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, C.J., and PUDLOWSKI and SIMON, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 874
Pages: 514–515

Head Matter:
Kathy DOBBY, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Matthew STECK d/b/a Bondtight Roofing Co., Defendant/Appellant.
No. 64185.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
March 15, 1994.
Rehearing Denied April 11, 1994.
Thomas A. Connelly, S.t. Louis, for defendant, appellant.
Mary Jill Wehmer, Clayton, for plaintiff, respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, C.J., and PUDLOWSKI and SIMON, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Matthew Steck d/b/a Bondtight Roofing Co., appeals from an adverse judgment entered in the Associate Circuit Court of St. Louis County awarding respondent, Kathy Dobby, $5,992.11 plus costs on her breach of contract action. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the findings and conclusions of the circuit court are not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the circuit court's order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum solely for the use the parties here involved has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.