Case Name: Kelso David WALLACE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bernadette LAMSON, Assistant County Attorney; Dianna Gunther; Linda Bird, Supervisor DHCA; Montgomery County Maryland, Defendants-Appellees; Kelso David Wallace, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bernadette Lamson, Assistant County Attorney; Dianna Gunther; Linda Bird, Supervisor DHCA; Montgomery County Maryland; Montgomery County Government Maryland, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-12-22
Citations: 588 F. App'x 283
Docket Number: Nos. 14-1863, 14-2274
Parties: Kelso David WALLACE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bernadette LAMSON, Assistant County Attorney; Dianna Gunther; Linda Bird, Supervisor DHCA; Montgomery County Maryland, Defendants-Appellees. Kelso David Wallace, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bernadette Lamson, Assistant County Attorney; Dianna Gunther; Linda Bird, Supervisor DHCA; Montgomery County Maryland; Montgomery County Government Maryland, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 588
Pages: 283–284

Head Matter:
Kelso David WALLACE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bernadette LAMSON, Assistant County Attorney; Dianna Gunther; Linda Bird, Supervisor DHCA; Montgomery County Maryland, Defendants-Appellees. Kelso David Wallace, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bernadette Lamson, Assistant County Attorney; Dianna Gunther; Linda Bird, Supervisor DHCA; Montgomery County Maryland; Montgomery County Government Maryland, Defendants-Appellees.
Nos. 14-1863, 14-2274.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 18, 2014.
Decided: Dec. 22, 2014.
Kelso David Wallace, Appellant Pro Se.
Charles Lowell Frederick, Edward Barry Lattner, County Attorney’s Office, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Kelso David Wallace appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his civil' complaint and his complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012). We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wallace v. Lamson, No. 8:13-cv-00866-PWG, 2014 WL 956935 (D.Md. Mar. 11, 2014); Wallace v. Lamson, No. 8-14-cv-02089-PWG, 2014 WL 5812333 (D.Md. Nov. 7, 2014). We deny Wallace's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.