Case Name: Mary Myers Appleby, complainant, v. Stewart H. Appleby, individually and as executor and trustee under the last will and testament of T. Frank Appleby, deceased, defendant; Tepper Bros., Inc., a body corporate, Golden Rule Kiddie Shop, Inc., a body corporate, and Isaac Berger, Inc., a body corporate, respondents, v. Karl G. Harr and Oscar A. Morgan, appellants
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1947-09-25
Citations: 140 N.J. Eq. 403
Docket Number: 
Parties: Mary Myers Appleby, complainant, v. Stewart H. Appleby, individually and as executor and trustee under the last will and testament of T. Frank Appleby, deceased, defendant. Tepper Bros., Inc., a body corporate, Golden Rule Kiddie Shop, Inc., a body corporate, and Isaac Berger, Inc., a body corporate, respondents, v. Karl G. Harr and Oscar A. Morgan, appellants.
Judges: For affirmance — The Chibe-J ustice, Bodine, Donges, EEeher, Colie, Eastwood, Burling, Wells, Dill, Ereund, MoGeei-ian, McLean, JJ. 12.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 140
Pages: 403–404

Head Matter:
Mary Myers Appleby, complainant, v. Stewart H. Appleby, individually and as executor and trustee under the last will and testament of T. Frank Appleby, deceased, defendant. Tepper Bros., Inc., a body corporate, Golden Rule Kiddie Shop, Inc., a body corporate, and Isaac Berger, Inc., a body corporate, respondents, v. Karl G. Harr and Oscar A. Morgan, appellants.
[Argued May 26th, 1947.
Decided September 25th, 1947.]
dir. "Wu-rd Kremer, for the respondents.
Messrs. Durand, Ivins <£• Garlón, for W. Harold Warren, substituted trustee.
Mr. John E. Toolan and Mr. Iluyler E. Romond, for the appellants.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The appeal in this ease questions the construction adopted in the Court of Chancery of a last will and testament.
After carefully considering tbe conclusions of the learned Yice-Chancellor and the arguments of counsel, we are of the opinion that the construction adopted therein is in all respects proper and that the decree under appeal should be affirmed, with costs..
For affirmance — The Chibe-J ustice, Bodine, Donges, EEeher, Colie, Eastwood, Burling, Wells, Dill, Ereund, MoGeei-ian, McLean, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.