Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James A. BRASWELL, Defendant-Appellant; United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James A. Braswell, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-03-14
Citations: 57 F. App'x 196
Docket Number: Nos. 02-7740, 02-7885
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James A. BRASWELL, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James A. Braswell, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 57
Pages: 196–196

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James A. BRASWELL, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James A. Braswell, Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 02-7740, 02-7885.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 25, 2003.
Decided March 14, 2003.
James A. Braswell, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee,
Before WIDENER, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges,
No. 02-7740 affirmed and No. 02-7885 dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
James A. Braswell appeals the district court's order denying his motion for an evidentiary hearing to reconstruct transcripts of his sentencing hearing, and his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the dismissal of his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) as untimely. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error or abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court in appeal No. 02-7740. See United States v. Braswell, No. CR-94-126-FO (E.D.N.C. filed May 15, 2002 & entered May 17, 2002), and deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss appeal No. 02-7885. See United States v. Braswell, No. CR-94-126-FO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 24, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
DISMISSED.