Case Name: In the Matter of Eastbrooke Condominium, by its Board of Managers on Behalf of All Homeowners and Brighton Eastbrooke Homeowners, Respondent, v. Elaine Ainsworth, Assessor, et al., Appellants. (Proceeding No. 1.); In the Matter of Eastbrooke Condominium, by its Board of Managers on Behalf of All Unit Owners, Respondent, v. Elaine Ainsworth, Assessor, et al., Appellants. (Proceeding No. 2.); In the Matter of Eastbrooke Condominium, by its Board of Managers on Behalf of All Unit Owners, Respondent, v. Town of Brighton Board of Assessment Review et al., Appellants. (Proceeding No. 3.)
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2017-02-10
Citations: 147 A.D.3d 1511
Docket Number: Appeal No. 2
Parties: In the Matter of Eastbrooke Condominium, by its Board of Managers on Behalf of All Homeowners and Brighton Eastbrooke Homeowners, Respondent, v Elaine Ainsworth, As sessor, et al., Appellants. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Eastbrooke Condominium, by its Board of Managers on Behalf of All Unit Owners, Respondent, v Elaine Ainsworth, Assessor, et al., Appellants. (Proceeding No. 2.) In the Matter of Eastbrooke Condominium, by its Board of Managers on Behalf of All Unit Owners, Respondent, v Town of Brighton Board of Assessment Review et al., Appellants. (Proceeding No. 3.)
Judges: Present — Centra, J.P., Peradotto, Curran, Troutman and Scudder, JJ.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 147
Pages: 1511–1512

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Eastbrooke Condominium, by its Board of Managers on Behalf of All Homeowners and Brighton Eastbrooke Homeowners, Respondent, v Elaine Ainsworth, As sessor, et al., Appellants. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Eastbrooke Condominium, by its Board of Managers on Behalf of All Unit Owners, Respondent, v Elaine Ainsworth, Assessor, et al., Appellants. (Proceeding No. 2.) In the Matter of Eastbrooke Condominium, by its Board of Managers on Behalf of All Unit Owners, Respondent, v Town of Brighton Board of Assessment Review et al., Appellants. (Proceeding No. 3.)
(Appeal No. 2.)
[46 NYS3d 814]

Opinion:
Appeal from an amended modified order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (John J. Ark, J.), entered November 18, 2015. The amended modified order granted in part the motion of petitioner to modify an order and judgment entered March 27, 2015 to the extent of designating owners entitled to refunds.
It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Villar v Howard, 126 AD3d 1297, 1300 [2015], affd 28 NY3d 74 [2016]).
Present — Centra, J.P., Peradotto, Curran, Troutman and Scudder, JJ.