Case Name: MAXWELL E. BUBLITZ AND ADELHEID BUBLITZ, PROSECUTORS, v. BOROUGH OF HILLSDALE, IN THE COUNTY OF BERGEN, DEFENDANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1931-01-23
Citations: 9 N.J. Misc. 238
Docket Number: 
Parties: MAXWELL E. BUBLITZ AND ADELHEID BUBLITZ, PROSECUTORS, v. BOROUGH OF HILLSDALE, IN THE COUNTY OF BERGEN, DEFENDANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 9
Pages: 238–238

Head Matter:
MAXWELL E. BUBLITZ AND ADELHEID BUBLITZ, PROSECUTORS, v. BOROUGH OF HILLSDALE, IN THE COUNTY OF BERGEN, DEFENDANT.
Submitted October term, 1930
Decided January 23, 1931.
Before Justices Parker, Campbell and Bodine.
Eor the prosecutors, Isaacs ■& Gunther.
Por the defendant, Maclcay & Maclcay.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
A previous application was made to Mr. Justice Parker at chambers. His conclusions appear in Bublitz v. Hillsdale, 8 N. J. Mis. R. 334. A further consideration of the matter by the three judges sitting in Part II lead to the same result as that expressed in those conclusions.
The writ will be denied, with costs.