Case Name: STATIC CONTROL COMPONENTS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DALLAS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, and Lexmark International, Inc., Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-07-29
Citations: 107 F. App'x 217
Docket Number: No. 04-1205
Parties: STATIC CONTROL COMPONENTS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DALLAS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, and Lexmark International, Inc., Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 107
Pages: 217–218

Head Matter:
STATIC CONTROL COMPONENTS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DALLAS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, and Lexmark International, Inc., Defendant.
No. 04-1205.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
July 29, 2004.
Alan H. Blankenheimer, Principal Attorney, Heller, Ehrman, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.
Baker M. Miller, Principal Attorney, McDermott, Will, Richard B. Rogers, of Counsel, McDermott, Will & Emery, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Opinion:
ORDER
PROST, Circuit Judge.
Static Control Components, Inc. moves to dismiss its appeal and for a remand "with instructions to the District Court to consider the parties' application for an order retaining jurisdiction to enforce the parties' settlement agreement." Static Control states that Dallas Semiconductor Corporation consents.
The court notes that it cannot both dismiss and remand the appeal.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) Static Control's motion to dismiss is denied.
(2) Static Control's motion to remand is granted.