Case Name: Janet L. THOMPSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS; Carol Fouty; Kanawha County, Magistrate Court; Robert H. Slack; James M. Albert; Arthur G. Angust; Barbara Allen; Jimmy Thaxton; William E. Murray; Chris Workman; Janice Isaacs; Brenda Richards; Judy Blaker, Defendants-Appellees, and Administrative Office of The Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-03-04
Citations: 122 F. App'x 643
Docket Number: No. 04-2534
Parties: Janet L. THOMPSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS; Carol Fouty; Kanawha County, Magistrate Court; Robert H. Slack; James M. Albert; Arthur G. Angust; Barbara Allen; Jimmy Thaxton; William E. Murray; Chris Workman; Janice Isaacs; Brenda Richards; Judy Blaker, Defendants—Appellees, and Administrative Office of The Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia, Defendant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 122
Pages: 643–644

Head Matter:
Janet L. THOMPSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS; Carol Fouty; Kanawha County, Magistrate Court; Robert H. Slack; James M. Albert; Arthur G. Angust; Barbara Allen; Jimmy Thaxton; William E. Murray; Chris Workman; Janice Isaacs; Brenda Richards; Judy Blaker, Defendants—Appellees, and Administrative Office of The Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia, Defendant.
No. 04-2534.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 24, 2005.
Decided: March 4, 2005.
Janet L. Thompson, Appellant pro se.
John M. Hedges, Teresa Jean Lyons, Byrne & Hedges, Morgantown, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Janet L. Thompson appeals the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation and dismissing her Title VII claim and granting immunity with respect to her 42 U.S.C. § 1981, 1983 (2000) claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Thompson v. West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals, No. CA-02-353-2 (S.D.W.Va. Dec. 6, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED