Case Name: Michael Walker, Respondent, v. Silver and Gold Realty Corporation, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1928-03-14
Citations: 131 Misc. 598
Docket Number: 
Parties: Michael Walker, Respondent, v. Silver and Gold Realty Corporation, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 131
Pages: 598–598

Head Matter:
Michael Walker, Respondent, v. Silver and Gold Realty Corporation, Appellant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
March 14, 1928.
Samuel Robert Welts, for the appellant.
Charles Marks, for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
It was entirely proper for the trial court to resubmit the case to the jury so that its verdict should correspond in form as well as in substance to the court's instructions. (Rogan v. Mullins, 22 App. Div. 117; Rippley v. Frazer, 69 Misc. 415.)
Order reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and verdict reinstated.
All concur; present, Bijur, Levy and Crain, JJ.