Case Name: Brown v. Morgan
Court: New York Court of Chancery
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1839
Citations: 3 Edw. Ch. 278
Docket Number: 
Parties: Brown v. Morgan.
Judges: 
Reporter: Edwards' Chancery Reports
Volume: 3
Pages: 278–279

Head Matter:
Brown v. Morgan.
1839.
Pleading. Answer. Exception Judgment creditor’s bill.
It is not enough that a defendant, in a judgment creditor’s suit, deny property “ except his necessary wearing apparel.” He must give a particular account and value of such wearing apparel, for the court to see that it is not above the amount exempted by law.

Opinion:
Upon an exception to an answer, The Vice-Chancellor said: The second exception is taken, because the defendant denies any property, excepting " his necessary wearing apparel" and does not set forth the particulars of it, nor its value. In Young v. Craft, (27 March, 1838), I held that a defendant, under a similar denial, was bound to give a particular account of his wearing apparel, in order that the court, and not the defendant, might judge whether it was only such as is exempt from execution by law and could be retained by him. If there should be over one hundred dollars in value, the court might apply the excess towards satisfying the judgment debt. I am of opinion the master erred in disallowing this exception.