Case Name: In re Kyle M. COURTNALL, Respondent
Court: District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Decision Date: 2014-05-01
Citations: 89 A.3d 1064
Docket Number: No. 14-BG-103
Parties: In re Kyle M. COURTNALL, Respondent.
Judges: BEFORE: THOMPSON, Associate Judge, and PRYOR and NEBEKER, Senior Judges.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 89
Pages: 1064–1065

Head Matter:
In re Kyle M. COURTNALL, Respondent.
No. 14-BG-103.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Filed May 1, 2014.
BEFORE: THOMPSON, Associate Judge, and PRYOR and NEBEKER, Senior Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
On consideration of the certified order suspending respondent's license to practice law in the state of Virginia for a period of 15 months, this court's February 12, 2014, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing him to show cause why the reciprocal discipline of disbarment should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file a response to this court's order to show cause or the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is
ORDERED that Kyle M. Courtnall is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a period of 15 months. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C.2010), and In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate). It is
FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement the period of respondent's suspension will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C.Bar R. XI, § 14(g).