Case Name: GEORGE H. MILLER, TRADING AS, ETC., APPELLANT, v. WINSTON PAUL ET AL., RESPONDENTS
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1944-09-14
Citations: 132 N.J.L. 169
Docket Number: 
Parties: GEORGE H. MILLER, TRADING AS, ETC., APPELLANT, v. WINSTON PAUL ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 132
Pages: 169–170

Head Matter:
GEORGE H. MILLER, TRADING AS, ETC., APPELLANT, v. WINSTON PAUL ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Submitted May 26, 1944 —
Decided September 14, 1944.
For the appellant, Samuel Rosenblatt and Joseph J. Corn.
For the respondents, Brunetto & Welsh.

Opinion:
Per. Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehbr, Pbrskie, Colie, Dear, Wells, Rapeerty, Hague, Thompson, Dill, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.