Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Bespondent, v. John W. Holland, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1935-05-03
Citations: 244 A.D. 287
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Bespondent, v. John W. Holland, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 244
Pages: 287–287

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Bespondent, v. John W. Holland, Appellant.
First Department,
May 3, 1935.
Robert J. Fitzsimmons of counsel [James P. Casey with him on the brief; Robert J. Fitzsimmons, attorney], for the appellant.
Vincent A. Catoggio, Jr., of counsel [William Copeland Dodge, District Attorney], for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We are satisfied from the evidence that the defendant's alleged oral confession to the police officer, which was essential to sustain the People's case, was procured by violence and intimidation. Furthermore, it was error to deny the defendant's counsel the right to examine the police officer concerning the circumstances under which the alleged confession was secured before receiving it in evidence. (People v. Rogers, 192 N. Y. 331; People v. Brasch, 193 id. 46.)
The judgment of conviction should be reversed and a new trial ordered.
Present — Martin, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, O'Malley and Untermyer, JJ.
Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered.