Case Name: Leonard J. Gregorio, Public Administrator of Westchester County, as Administrator of the Estate of Pawel A. Fruba, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. City of New York et al., Defendants; Stanislaw Starczewski, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Iwona Starczewski, Deceased, Appellant, v. City of New York, Respondent; Public Administrator of the County of Westchester, as Administrator of the Estate of Jolanta E. Glowacz, Deceased, Appellant, v. City of New York, Respondent. (And Another Action.)
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1999-05-13
Citations: 93 N.Y.2d 917
Docket Number: 
Parties: Leonard J. Gregorio, Public Administrator of Westchester County, as Administrator of the Estate of Pawel A. Fruba, Deceased, Plaintiff, v City of New York et al., Defendants. Stanislaw Starczewski, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Iwona Starczewski, Deceased, Appellant, v City of New York, Respondent. Public Administrator of the County of Westchester, as Administrator of the Estate of Jolanta E. Glowacz, Deceased, Appellant, v City of New York, Respondent. (And Another Action.)
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 93
Pages: 917–917

Head Matter:
Leonard J. Gregorio, Public Administrator of Westchester County, as Administrator of the Estate of Pawel A. Fruba, Deceased, Plaintiff, v City of New York et al., Defendants. Stanislaw Starczewski, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Iwona Starczewski, Deceased, Appellant, v City of New York, Respondent. Public Administrator of the County of Westchester, as Administrator of the Estate of Jolanta E. Glowacz, Deceased, Appellant, v City of New York, Respondent. (And Another Action.)
Submitted April 19, 1999;
decided May 13, 1999

Opinion:
Motion to dismiss appeal granted and appeal dismissed, with $400 costs and $100 costs of motion, upon the ground that the State Constitution (art VI, § 3 [b] [3], [4]) and the Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR 5601 [c]; 5602 [b] [1]) do not authorize a grant of leave to defendant on a certified question in these circumstances (see, Maynard v Greenberg, 82 NY2d 913).