Case Name: Doris E. KLEIN, et al. Plaintiffs Janet Wagner, Plaintiff-Appellant v. STOP-N-GO, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1987-04-16
Citations: 869 F.2d 899
Docket Number: No. 85-3591
Parties: Doris E. KLEIN, et al. Plaintiffs Janet Wagner, Plaintiff-Appellant v. STOP-N-GO, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before JONES and KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judges, and CELEBREZZE, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 869
Pages: 899–917

Head Matter:
Doris E. KLEIN, et al. Plaintiffs Janet Wagner, Plaintiff-Appellant v. STOP-N-GO, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 85-3591.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Argued Aug. 12, 1986.
Decided April 16, 1987.
Before JONES and KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judges, and CELEBREZZE, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Statement by KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge.
Judges Jones and Celebrezze have decided not to publish their majority opinion reversing and remanding the trial court's resolution of the above-styled case. Since I am of the firm belief that the case addresses important issues of continuing concern to both bench and bar, I have elected not to join them in their disposition of this appeal. Accordingly, I am filing my separate opinion articulating my reasons favoring the affirmance of the trial court's disposition of the controversy, which opinion I am making available to the bench and bar through publication.
For the convenience of the bench and bar, I have attached the full text of the majority opinion as "Appendix A" to the dissent.