Case Name: G.R., Petitioner, v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS; APM Terminals, Incorporated; Signal Mutual Indemnity Association, Limited, Respondents
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-09-30
Citations: 332 F. App'x 902
Docket Number: No. 08-2317
Parties: G.R., Petitioner, v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS; APM Terminals, Incorporated; Signal Mutual Indemnity Association, Limited, Respondents.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 332
Pages: 902–903

Head Matter:
G.R., Petitioner, v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS; APM Terminals, Incorporated; Signal Mutual Indemnity Association, Limited, Respondents.
No. 08-2317.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 9, 2009.
Decided: Sept. 30, 2009.
Bruce Bennett Eisenstein, Baltimore, Maryland, for Petitioner. Lawrence P. Postol, Seyfarth Shaw LLP, Washington, D.C., for Respondents APM Terminals, Incorporated, and Signal Mutual Indemnity Association, Limited.
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
G.R. seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's award of longshore disability benefits pursuant to 33 U.S.C. § 901-950 (2006). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. G.R. v. APM Terminals, Inc., No. 08-0435 (B.R.B. Sept. 29, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.