Case Name: Wright v. West's Executrix
Court: United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1806-03
Citations: 1 Cranch 303
Docket Number: 
Parties: Wright v. West’s Executrix.
Judges: 
Reporter: Reports of cases argued and determined in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia (District of Columbia - reported by Mackey)
Volume: 1
Pages: 303–304

Head Matter:
Wright v. West’s Executrix.
A devise of lands, “ after payment of debts,” subjects the land to the payment of the debts.
Where a clerk certifies the mayor, it is not necessary that the mayor should certify the clerk.
Bill in equity for the sale of real estate to pay debts. The words of the will were, “ I give the whole of what I may be possessed of, at my decease, and after my debts are paid, to Mrs. West.”
The plaintiff’s claim was for a balance due for work and labor.
Mr. E. J. Lee, for the defendant,
demurred to the bill, because it did not state that the plaintiff could not establish his debt at law, nor that he could not prove the amount of assets at law. If the will makes the real estate assets, the executrix is bound to return them in the inventory.
Demurrer overruled.
The defendant then offered an answer, sworn before an aider-man of Richmond, who was ex officio a justice of the peace. Rev. Code, 72. The alderman was certified by the Mayor of Richmond, who was certified by the clerk of the Court of Hustings.
Mr. Taylor, for the plaintiff,
objected to the answer, because the mayor had not certified the clerk of the Court of Hustings.

Opinion:
But the Court
overruled the objection, upon consideration of the case of Potts v. Ghequiere, in this Court in March, 1805, not reported.