Case Name: McGOWAN v. NEW YORK CITY RY. CO.
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1906-06-28
Citations: 99 N.Y.S. 835
Docket Number: 
Parties: McGOWAN v. NEW YORK CITY RY. CO.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 99
Pages: 835–835

Head Matter:
McGOWAN v. NEW YORK CITY RY. CO.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
June 28, 1906.)
Cabriers—Regulation—Street Railroads—1Transfers.
Though a street railroad company may make rules or regulations as to the issuance or use of transfers, such a rule is not binding on the passengers where no reasonable notice of its existence is given the public.
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Third District.
Action by Thomas McGowan against the New York City Railway Company. From a judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiff appeals.
Reversed, and new trial ordered.
Argued before GILDERSLEEVE, LEVENTRITT, and McCALL, JJ.
Harcourt Bull, for appellant.
Frank D. Wynn, for respondent.

Opinion:
McCALL, J.
The judgment must be reversed. There is no doubt that the plaintiff was, under the statute, entitled to a transfer. But we are of the opinion that, under a properly presented case, based upon sufficient facts, courts will uphold a rule or regulation in the issuing or use of transfers that will recognize public convenience. But the mere making of such a rule will not be sufficient; there is the further duty of giving reasonable notice of the existence of such a rule, so that the public may not be misled in applying for transfers. As it does not appear that the defendant adopted any method of notifying the public of the institution of such a rule, the judgment must be reversed.
Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to ' abide the event. All concur.