Case Name: In the Matter of Arlene R. Siegel, Individually and as Guardian of Alfred R. Siegel, Appellant, v. Pearl K. Siegel et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1980-09-09
Citations: 51 N.Y.2d 763
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Arlene R. Siegel, Individually and as Guardian of Alfred R. Siegel, Appellant, v Pearl K. Siegel et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 51
Pages: 763–763

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Arlene R. Siegel, Individually and as Guardian of Alfred R. Siegel, Appellant, v Pearl K. Siegel et al., Respondents.
Submitted July 21, 1980;
decided September 9, 1980

Opinion:
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution (Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, § 36).