Case Name: Gregory E. POTH, Respondent, v. Margaret C. POTH and Daniel S. Poth, Appellants
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-06-27
Citations: 199 S.W.3d 792
Docket Number: No. ED 87563
Parties: Gregory E. POTH, Respondent, v. Margaret C. POTH and Daniel S. Poth, Appellants.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 199
Pages: 792–793

Head Matter:
Gregory E. POTH, Respondent, v. Margaret C. POTH and Daniel S. Poth, Appellants.
No. ED 87563.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
June 27, 2006.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 9, 2006.
Application for Transfer Denied Sept. 26, 2006.
William Bernard Fortenbury, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Alan J. Steinberg, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Margaret C. Poth and Daniel S. Poth ("Petitioners") appeal from the trial court's judgment granting Gregory E. Poth's Motion to Dismiss Petitioners motion to "Determine Amounts Due from [Gregory E. Poth]."
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and no error of law appears. The trial court's judgment was supported by substantial evidence on the record. No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the general principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).