Case Name: In the INTEREST OF: C.J.L., S.L.L., L.D.L. Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. S.L. (Father), Appellant.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2018-11-06
Citations: 568 S.W.3d 27
Docket Number: WD 81692 Consolidated with WD 81694; WD 81696
Parties: In the INTEREST OF: C.J.L., S.L.L., L.D.L.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 568
Pages: 27–27

Head Matter:
In the INTEREST OF: C.J.L., S.L.L., L.D.L.
Juvenile Officer, Respondent,
v.
S.L. (Father), Appellant.
WD 81692 Consolidated with WD 81694
WD 81696
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Filed: November 6, 2018
Jack A. Lewis, North Kansas City for appellant.
John R. Shank, Joseph W. Vanover for respondent Juvenile Officer; Juliann W. Graves, Guardian for plaintiffs.
Before Division One: Lisa White Hardwick, Presiding Judge, Edward R. Ardini, Jr. and Thomas N. Chapman, Judges
ORDER

Opinion:
Per Curiam
S.L. appeals the judgments terminating his parental rights to three children, C.J.L., S.L.L., and L.D.L. He contends the circuit court erred in terminating his parental rights for failure to rectify because the juvenile officer failed to establish that Children's Division ("Division") made diligent and repeated efforts to utilize all available services related to meeting his needs. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgments. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value.
AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).