Case Name: Town of Bradley, a Municipal Corporation, Plaintiff in Error, v. J. H. Kirkland, et al., Defendants in Error
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1933-05-13
Citations: 110 Fla. 239
Docket Number: 
Parties: Town of Bradley, a Municipal Corporation, Plaintiff in Error, v. J. H. Kirkland, et al., Defendants in Error.
Judges: Whitfield, P. J., and BrowN and Buford, J. J., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 110
Pages: 239–240

Head Matter:
Town of Bradley, a Municipal Corporation, Plaintiff in Error, v. J. H. Kirkland, et al., Defendants in Error.
148 So. 540.
Opinion filed May 13, 1933.
Peterson, Carver & Langston, for Plaintiff in Error;
0. Edgar Williams, for Defendants in Error.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This- case was heretofore before us and opinion was filed March 2, 1932. See 139 Sou. 144. It is now before us on final decree ousting the municipality from exercising jurisdiction and municipal powers over certain lands described in the petition.
The only question before us now for our consideration is whether or not the evidence was sufficient to constitute a basis for the final decree. We find in the record substantial evidence to support the decree and, therefore, under the oft-repeated rule enunciated by this Court, the decree of the chancellor should not be reversed. The law as apparently applied in this case by the chancellor has recently been enunciated by this Court in the opinion on the case of State ex rel. Davis, Town of Lake Placid, filed at this term of the Court. See 92 Fla. 863, 110 So. 460.
The decree should'be affirmed and it is s'o ordered.
Affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and BrowN and Buford, J. J., concur.
Davis, C. J., and Ellis and Terrell, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.