Case Name: STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Jimmy Dean RANDLEY, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-09-11
Citations: 593 So. 2d 514
Docket Number: No. 90-0211
Parties: STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Jimmy Dean RANDLEY, Appellee.
Judges: DOWNEY, HERSEY and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 593
Pages: 514–514

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Jimmy Dean RANDLEY, Appellee.
No. 90-0211.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Sept. 11, 1991.
Rehearing Denied March 17, 1992.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James J. Carney, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Cherry Grant, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Prior report: 567 So.2d 442.
We withdraw the prior opinion entered in this case and substitute the following:
The state appeals the trial court's order granting Jimmy Dean Randley's motion to suppress. We reverse.
The trial court, relying on Bostick v. State, 554 So.2d 1153 (Fla.1989), found that Randley had been unlawfully detained and concluded that all evidence and statements were therefore subject to suppression.
Subsequently, in Florida v. Bostick, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2382, 115 L.Ed.2d 389 (1991) the United States Supreme Court reversed Bostick v. State, supra, and held that the Fourth Amendment permits police officers to approach individuals at random on a bus to ask them questions and to request consent to search their luggage, so long as a reasonable person would understand that he or she could refuse to cooperate.
In light of this most recent opinion, we reverse the trial court's order granting Randley's motion to suppress and remand to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with Florida v. Bostick, supra.
DOWNEY, HERSEY and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.