Case Name: Lance DRUDGE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-10-16
Citations: 381 S.W.3d 396
Docket Number: No. ED 96795
Parties: Lance DRUDGE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J. and GLENN A. NORTON, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 381
Pages: 396–396

Head Matter:
Lance DRUDGE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 96795.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Oct. 16, 2012.
Ellen H. Flottman, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Foster, Attorney General, Timothy A. Blackwell, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J. and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Lance Drudge appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).