Case Name: Louis Birnhak, Respondent, v. Abraham Rubinstein, Appellant. Fannie Feiner and Others, Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1928-12
Citations: 225 A.D. 770
Docket Number: 
Parties: Louis Birnhak, Respondent, v. Abraham Rubinstein, Appellant. Fannie Feiner and Others, Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 225
Pages: 770–770

Head Matter:
Louis Birnhak, Respondent, v. Abraham Rubinstein, Appellant. Fannie Feiner and Others, Defendants.

Opinion:
Order denying motion of defendant Rubinstein to dismiss third amended complaint, and order denying motion for reargument affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. We think the complaint states a cause of action; that the restriction alleged in the complaint against the erection upon the property of any structure other than a " dwelling house " prevents the erection of a hotel; and that plaintiff, therefore, properly exercised the option contained in the contract for its cancellation and the return of the deposit. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Kapper and Hagarty, JJ., concur.