Case Name: Santi JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2017-03-28
Citations: 514 S.W.3d 646
Docket Number: No. ED 104034
Parties: Santi JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 514
Pages: 646–646

Head Matter:
Santi JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 104034
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Filed: March 28, 2017
Kristina Starke Olson, Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Daniel N. McPherson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Santi Johnson appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).