Case Name: Jermain WAGNER, Employee/Respondent, v. TRUE MANUFACTURING, CO., INC., Employer/Appellant, and Division of Employment, Security, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2016-09-13
Citations: 498 S.W.3d 859
Docket Number: No. ED 103981
Parties: Jermain WAGNER, Employee/Respondent, v. TRUE MANUFACTURING, CO., INC., Employer/Appellant, and Division of Employment, Security, Respondent.
Judges: Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J„ and Lisa P. Page, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 498
Pages: 859–859

Head Matter:
Jermain WAGNER, Employee/Respondent, v. TRUE MANUFACTURING, CO., INC., Employer/Appellant, and Division of Employment, Security, Respondent.
No. ED 103981
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
FILED: September 13, 2016
Kristen N. James, Bearden, Breckenridge & Gidlow, LLC, O'Fallon, MO, for Appellant.
Larry Raymond Ruhmann-attorney for Division, of Employment Security, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Jermain Wagner, Hazelwood, MO, pro se.
Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J„ and Lisa P. Page, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
True Manufacturing Company, Inc, ("Employer") appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's ("Commission") decision finding Jermain Wagner ("Employee")' was not disqualified from unemployment benefits due to misconduct. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on. appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided' a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).