Case Name: Rose Gold Richman, complainant-respondent, v. Harry Richman, defendant-appellant
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1941-02-03
Citations: 129 N.J. Eq. 114
Docket Number: 
Parties: Rose Gold Richman, complainant-respondent, v. Harry Richman, defendant-appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 129
Pages: 114–119

Head Matter:
Rose Gold Richman, complainant-respondent, v. Harry Richman, defendant-appellant.
[Decided February 3d, 1941.]
Mr. Reuben P. Goldstein {Mr. Maurice O. Brigadier, of counsel), for the appellant.
Messrs. Levenson, Gomen <& Levenson, for the respondent.

Opinion:
Pee Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Advisory Master Herr in the Court of Chancery.
For affirmance — Dofges, Perskie, Porter, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Hague, JJ. 7.
For reversal — The Chiee-Justioe, Parker, Case, Bodine, I-Ieher, Raeeerty, JJ. 6.