Case Name: In re: Stephan M. BULLIS, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-05-11
Citations: 129 F. App'x 860
Docket Number: No. 04-7692
Parties: In re: Stephan M. BULLIS, Petitioner.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 129
Pages: 860–861

Head Matter:
In re: Stephan M. BULLIS, Petitioner.
No. 04-7692.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 20, 2005.
Decided: May 11, 2005.
Stephan M. Bullís, Petitioner pro se.
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Stephan M. Bullís petitions for writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the docket sheet reveals that the district court dismissed Bullis's § 2255 motion on March 28, 2005. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Bullis's case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED