Case Name: Eddie JAVOR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1972-10-25
Citations: 467 F.2d 481
Docket Number: No. 72-1502
Parties: Eddie JAVOR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 467
Pages: 481–482

Head Matter:
Eddie JAVOR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 72-1502.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Oct. 25, 1972.
Rehearing Denied Dec. 12, 1972.
Richmond G. Sherman (argued), Beverly Hills, Cal., for petitioner-appellant.
David P. Curnow, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Eric A. Nobles, Asst. U. S. Atty., William D. Keller, U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent-appel-lee.
Before ELY and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges, and ENRIGHT, District Judge.
The Honorable William B. Enright, United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Petitioner appeals the denial of habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He contended that his retained attorney was incompetent, and that he had been denied the effective assistance of counsel at his trial.
The critical factual determination on the competence of counsel was made after a comprehensive hearing in which the district court gave careful consideration to every point urged by petitioner. The findings against the petitioner are supported by substantial evidence.
Affirmed.