Case Name: Jerome P. Uptegrove et al., Respt's, v. Central R. Co. of New Jersey, App'lt
Court: New York City Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1895-11-26
Citations: 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 896
Docket Number: 
Parties: Jerome P. Uptegrove et al., Respt’s, v. Central R. Co. of New Jersey, App’lt.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 70
Pages: 896–896

Head Matter:
Jerome P. Uptegrove et al., Respt’s, v. Central R. Co. of New Jersey, App’lt.
N. Y. C. C.,
November 26, 1895.
JDeForest Bros., for app’lt; M. P. O’Oonnor, for resp’ts.

Opinion:
McCarthy, J.
—Both sides, having moved for a direction of a verdict, left the questions of law and fact to the trial justice to determine. We have examined the facts very carefully, and, under Park v. Preston, 108 N. Y. 434, 437; 15 N. E. 705, think the judgment should be affirmed, and it is so ordered, with costs. See Jennings v. Railroad Co., 127 N. Y. 449; 28 N. E. 394.