Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Michael INMAN, Appellant; Michael INMAN, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1994-03-08
Citations: 871 S.W.2d 144
Docket Number: Nos. 61498, 64106
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Michael INMAN, Appellant. Michael INMAN, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 871
Pages: 144–144

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Michael INMAN, Appellant. Michael INMAN, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 61498, 64106.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
March 8, 1994.
Tamara Detloff, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Becky Owenson Kilpatrick, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant, Michael Inman, appeals from the judgment of conviction, after a jury trial, of assault in the second degree, § 565.060, RSMo (Cum.Supp.1992), for which he was sentenced as a class X offender to 12 years imprisonment. He also appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evi-dentiary hearing.
We have reviewed defendant's direct appeal. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Defendant has failed to brief any claims of error relative to his motion for postconviction relief. The appeal from the denial of defendant's Rule 29.15 motion is dismissed.