Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SEAL B, et al., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-03-17
Citations: 58 F. App'x 736
Docket Number: No. 01-50641; D.C. # CR-89-00955-LEW/MLR
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. SEAL B, et al., Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 58
Pages: 736–737

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. SEAL B, et al., Defendant—Appellant.
No. 01-50641.
D.C. # CR-89-00955-LEW/MLR.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 10, 2003.
Decided March 17, 2003.
Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Seal B appeals from his 135-month sentence imposed following the revocation of his probation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Seal B's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no arguable issues for review, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our examination of the briefs and our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no issues warranting review. Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not he cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.