Case Name: Donna Lou NESMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-10-28
Citations: 608 So. 2d 96
Docket Number: No. 91-03526
Parties: Donna Lou NESMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: LEHAN, C.J., and RYDER, J., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 608
Pages: 96–96

Head Matter:
Donna Lou NESMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 91-03526.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Oct. 28, 1992.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Cynthia J. Dodge, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Dale E. Tarpley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
THREADGILL, Judge.
The appellant challenges the denial of her motion to suppress cocaine found in her wallet incident to her warrantless arrest for a misdemeanor in violation of a Polk County Ordinance. We reverse.
On February 13, 1986, the appellant was arrested in the bar of La Pleasures Lounge in Auburndale for nude dancing in an establishment that sells alcoholic beverages, a violation of Polk County Ordinance 81-25 and 83-21. A female officer summoned by the arresting officers conducted the search incident to arrest that uncovered the cocaine. Although she testified at the suppression hearing, she had not seen the appellant commit the misdemeanor.
On October 3,1991, the appellant entered a plea of nolo contendere to possession of cocaine in violation of section 893.13(l)(e), Florida Statutes (1985), reserving the right to appeal the denial of her motion to suppress.
A law enforcement officer may only effect a warrantless arrest for a misdemean- or when it has been committed in his presence. § 901.15(1), Fla.Stat. (1985); Peterson v. State, 578 So.2d 749 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).
Although the female officer testified that she was summoned to assist in the arrest, there was no testimony from any officer who actually witnessed the violation. In the absence of such evidence, the state failed to prove that the search was incident to a valid arrest.
We therefore reverse the order denying suppression of the cocaine.
Reversed and remanded.
LEHAN, C.J., and RYDER, J., concur.
. § 125.69, Fla.Stat. (1985).