Case Name: STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. WILLIAM CAMERON, Defendant
Court: Montana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Montana
Decision Date: 2007-11-15
Citations: 340 Mont. 120
Docket Number: CAUSE NO. BDC-02-093C
Parties: STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. WILLIAM CAMERON, Defendant,
Judges: Chairperson, Hon. Randal I. Spaulding, Member, Hon. Katherine Irigoin and Member, Hon. Stewart Stadler
Reporter: Montana Reports
Volume: 340
Pages: 120–121

Head Matter:
NOVEMBER 2007 CALENDAR
STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. WILLIAM CAMERON, Defendant,
CAUSE NO. BDC-02-093C
DECISION

Opinion:
On January 10, 2003, the defendant was sentenced to forty (40) years in the Montana State Prison, with twenty (20) years suspended, for the offense of Sexual Assault, a felony. The Defendant shall not be eligible for parole until he completes Phases I and II of the Montana State Prison Sex Offender Program. Further, he shall not be eligible for parole in any event for a period of ten (10) years.
On November 2,2007, the defendant's application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
The defendant was present and was represented by Larry Murphy. The state was represented by Joel Thompson who appeared via videoconference.
Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.
Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that "the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive." (§46-18-904(3), MCA).
The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.
Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.
Done in open Court this 2nd day of November, 2007.
DATED this 15th day of November, 2007.
Chairperson, Hon. Randal I. Spaulding, Member, Hon. Katherine Irigoin and Member, Hon. Stewart Stadler