Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Orlando JOHNSON, a/k/a James Armand Johnson, a/k/a James Johnson, a/k/a James A. Johnson, a/k/a James Omar Johnson, a/k/a James Armond Johnson, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-06-30
Citations: 577 F. App'x 150
Docket Number: No. 14-6381
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Orlando JOHNSON, a/k/a James Armand Johnson, a/k/a James Johnson, a/k/a James A. Johnson, a/k/a James Omar Johnson, a/k/a James Armond Johnson, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 577
Pages: 150–150

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Orlando JOHNSON, a/k/a James Armand Johnson, a/k/a James Johnson, a/k/a James A. Johnson, a/k/a James Omar Johnson, a/k/a James Armond Johnson, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 14-6381.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 26, 2014.
Decided: June 30, 2014.
James Orlando Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. David Ira Salem, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James Orlando Johnson seeks to appeal the portion of the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appeal-able unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003).
We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Johnson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.