Case Name: In the Matter of Golden City Park Corporation, Appellant, against Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1942-12-03
Citations: 289 N.Y. 720
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Golden City Park Corporation, Appellant, against Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 289
Pages: 720–721

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Golden City Park Corporation, Appellant, against Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York et al., Respondents.
Argued October 29, 1942;
decided December 3, 1942.
William B. Roulstone and Adam Frank for appellant.
William C. Chanler, Corporation Counsel (James Hall Prothero, Paxton Blair and Rose Schneph of counsel), for respondents.

Opinion:
Order affirmed, with costs. There is evidence sufficient to support the findings that the structure in question was not an " amusement device " within the meaning of the Administrative Code. We pass upon no other question. No opinion.
Concur: Lehman, Ch. J. Loughran, Finch, Rippby, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ.