Case Name: Anthony LABRIZETTA, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee; George SARGENT, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1937-04-06
Citations: 89 F.2d 1018
Docket Number: Nos. 7347, 7348
Parties: Anthony LABRIZETTA, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. George SARGENT, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 89
Pages: 1018–1018

Head Matter:
Anthony LABRIZETTA, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. George SARGENT, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
Nos. 7347, 7348.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
April 6, 1937.
Howell Leuck, of Cleveland, Ohio, for Labrizetta.
Marc J. Wolpaw, of Cleveland, Ohio, for Sargent.
E. B. Freed, U. S. Atty., of Cleveland, Ohio.
Before MOORMAN, SIMONS, and ALLEN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The record in these causes presents no question of law but only a question of fact as to whether the appellants committed the offense charged in the indictment. Each of them offered the defense of an alibi. On considering the evidence the jury refused to accept their defenses and found them guilty. That finding is supported by substantial evidence, and, it appearing that no error was committed by the court in submitting the issue to the jury, it is ordered that the judgments be affirmed.