Case Name: CORBIN v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1912-12-11
Citations: 151 S.W. 1051
Docket Number: 
Parties: CORBIN v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 151
Pages: 1051–1051

Head Matter:
CORBIN v. STATE.
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Dec. 11, 1912.)
Criminal Law (§ 1090 ) — Record — Questions Reviewable — Denial of Motion fob New Teial.
Questions raised in a motion for new trial cannot be considered on appeal, where there is neither statement of facts nor bill of exceptions in the record.
[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2653, 2789, 2803-2827, 2927, 2928, 2948, 3204; Dec. Dig. § 1090. ]
Appeal from Criminal District Court, Dallas County; Barry Miller, Judge.
Tom Corbin was convicted of crime, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
For other cases see same topic and section NUMBER in Dec. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key-No. Series & Rep’r Indexes

Opinion:
DAVIDSON, P. J.
Appellant was convicted of the offense of incest; bis punishment being assessed at two years' confinement in the penitentiary.
There is neither a statement of facts nor bills of exception in the record. The matters attempted to be raised in the motion for new trial cannot be considered in the absence of a statement of facts.
The judgment is therefore affirmed.