Case Name: Michael CRUMP, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-11-20
Citations: 60 S.W.3d 47
Docket Number: No. 78873
Parties: Michael CRUMP, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 60
Pages: 47–48

Head Matter:
Michael CRUMP, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent.
No. 78873.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Nov. 20, 2001.
Rosalynn Koch, Assistant Public Defender, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Michael Crump (Movant) appeals from a judgment denying his request for post-conviction relief under Rule 29.15 follow ing an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims ineffective assistance of trial counsel for failing to move to dismiss the information against Movant. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court's judgment is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2001, unless otherwise indicated.