Case Name: VIO CHEMICAL CO., Appellant, v. HARTMAN, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1908-05-27
Citations: 111 N.Y.S. 1148
Docket Number: 
Parties: VIO CHEMICAL CO., Appellant, v. HARTMAN, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 111
Pages: 1148–1149

Head Matter:
VIO CHEMICAL CO., Appellant, v. HARTMAN, Respondent.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
May 27, 1908.)
Action by the Vio Chemical Company against. Caroline Hartman.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Judgment affirmed, with costs. Held, that the plaintiff failed to prove the cause of action alleged, that the daughter was the agent of the defendant in the execution of the papers, and that there was no proof of partnership between the daughter and the mother.