Case Name: David FITZPATRICK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-07-05
Citations: 165 S.W.3d 596
Docket Number: No. WD 64187
Parties: David FITZPATRICK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before EDWIN H. SMITH, C.J., ROBERT G. ULRICH and JAMES M. SMART, JR., JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 165
Pages: 596–596

Head Matter:
David FITZPATRICK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 64187.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
July 5, 2005.
Ruth Sanders, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
Deborah Daniels, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before EDWIN H. SMITH, C.J., ROBERT G. ULRICH and JAMES M. SMART, JR., JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
David Fitzpatrick appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15. In his sole point on appeal, Mr. Fitzpatrick contends that he was denied effective assistance of counsel when his trial counsel failed to depose two witnesses before trial.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).