Case Name: Thomas MERRILL, Petitioner, v. Cynthia PARTRIDGE, Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-08-31
Citations: 765 So. 2d 305
Docket Number: No. 5D00-1971
Parties: Thomas MERRILL, Petitioner, v. Cynthia PARTRIDGE, Respondent.
Judges: COBB, HARRIS, and GRIFFIN, JJ„ concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 765
Pages: 305–305

Head Matter:
Thomas MERRILL, Petitioner, v. Cynthia PARTRIDGE, Respondent.
No. 5D00-1971.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Aug. 31, 2000.
Jeffrey W. Wiggs, Mt. Dora, for Petitioner.
Candace A. Hawthorne, of Hawthorne Law Firm, P.A., Tavares, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We find no error in the denial of the initial motion to recuse. As to the amended motion to recuse, it appears from the documents filed in this court that it was untimely filed. See• Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.160(e); Carter v. Howey, 707 So.2d 906 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Dura-Stress, Inc. v. Law, 634 So.2d 769 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). The petitioner has not demonstrated any good cause for an exception to the ten-day time requirement.
PETITION DENIED.
COBB, HARRIS, and GRIFFIN, JJ" concur.