Case Name: In the Matter of Franklyn L. Lowenthal, an Attorney, Respondent. Joint Bar Association Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District, Petitioner
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1979-12-17
Citations: 71 A.D.2d 305
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Franklyn L. Lowenthal, an Attorney, Respondent. Joint Bar Association Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District, Petitioner.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 71
Pages: 305–306

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Franklyn L. Lowenthal, an Attorney, Respondent. Joint Bar Association Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District, Petitioner.
Second Department,
December 17, 1979
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Donald E. Humphrey for petitioner.
Morton N. Wekstein for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Per Curiam.
The respondent was admitted to practice by this court on March 31, 1948. In this proceeding to discipline him for professional misconduct, the petitioner moves to confirm the report of the retired Justice of the Supreme Court to whom the issues were referred for hearing and report. The respondent has submitted an áffirmation in opposition to the petitioner's motion.
The Referee found the respondent guilty of neglect and of other improprieties with respect to his handling of an estate and various other legal matters.
After reviewing all of the evidence, we are in full agreement with the findings contained in the report of the Referee. Accordingly, the petitioner's motion to confirm the report is granted.
In determining an appropriate measure of discipline to be imposed, we are mindful of the evidence that the respondent never intended to commit an act of misfeasance and that the respondent has made full restitution in this matter. Accordingly, the respondent should be, and he hereby is, censured for his misconduct.
Mollen, P.J., Hopkins, Damiani, Titone and Lazek, JJ., concur.