Case Name: Siebrand Niewenhous, Appellant, v. The Manhattan Railway Company and The New York Elevated Railroad Company, Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1906-03
Citations: 112 A.D. 895
Docket Number: 
Parties: Siebrand Niewenhous, Appellant, v. The Manhattan Railway Company and The New York Elevated Railroad Company, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 112
Pages: 895–895

Head Matter:
Siebrand Niewenhous, Appellant, v. The Manhattan Railway Company and The New York Elevated Railroad Company, Respondents.
Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of tue Supreme Court, entered in the clerk’s office of the county of New York on the 29th day of June, 1905, dismissing plaintiff’s complaint upon the merits.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
The plaintiff's proofs failed to establish that he h id suffered any diminution in rental value, but we think they did show that he was entitled to some fee damage. A dismissal of his complaint was, therefore, error. The judgment must be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Present — O'Brien, P. J., Patterson, McLaughlin, Laughlin and Houghton, JJ. Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event. Order filed.