Case Name: ACE BEER DISTRIBUTORS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STROH BREWERY COMPANY, Inc., Defendant-Appellee; ACE BEER DISTRIBUTORS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KOHN, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1960-04-27
Citations: 280 F.2d 424
Docket Number: Nos. 14,025, 14,026
Parties: ACE BEER DISTRIBUTORS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STROH BREWERY COMPANY, Inc., Defendant-Appellee. ACE BEER DISTRIBUTORS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KOHN, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 280
Pages: 424–424

Head Matter:
ACE BEER DISTRIBUTORS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STROH BREWERY COMPANY, Inc., Defendant-Appellee. ACE BEER DISTRIBUTORS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KOHN, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Nos. 14,025, 14,026.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
April 27, 1960.
Myron Krotinger, Cleveland, Ohio, Mendelsohn, Krotinger & Lane, Cleveland, Ohio, of counsel, for Ace Beer Distributors, Inc.
Rockwell T. Gust, Detroit, Mich., But-zel, Eaman, Long, Gust & Kennedy, Detroit, Mich., Arter, Hadden, Wykoff & Van Duzer, Cleveland, Ohio, for Stroh Brewery Co., Inc.
C. Kenneth Clark, Youngstown, Ohio, Harrington, Huxley & Smith, Youngstown, Ohio, Charles G. Schnur, Akron, Ohio, of counsel, for Kohn, Inc., and others.
Before McALLISTER, Chief Judge, SIMONS, Senior Circuit Judge, and WEICK, Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The .above cause coming on to be heard on an appeal from, orders denying petitions for preliminary injunctions in the above cases, and after hearing the ease upon the record, the briefs of the parties and the arguments of counsel in open court, and after due consideration of the reasons, set forth in the oral ruling of the Court denying the issuance of the preliminary injunctions, and the Court being duly advised:
Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the orders of the District Court denying preliminary injunctions in the above cases be and are hereby affirmed.