Case Name: STATE ex rel. SHORT v. KYGAR et al.
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1923-11-20
Citations: 96 Okla. 188
Docket Number: No. 14410
Parties: STATE ex rel. SHORT v. KYGAR et al.
Judges: JOHNSON, C. J., and KENNAMER, NICHOLSON, and COCHRAN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 96
Pages: 188–189

Head Matter:
STATE ex rel. SHORT v. KYGAR et al.
No. 14410
Opinion Filed Nov. 20, 1923.
Rehearing Denied Dec. 18, 1923.
(Syllabus.)
Former Decision Controlling.
The demurrer to plaintiffs’ petition is sustained, and action dismissed upon authority of State of Oklahoma ex rel. George E. Short, Attorney General, Plaintiff, v. O,. P. Callahan, C. E. Hall, and J. W. Wiker, Defendants, No. 14409, this day handed down, 96 Okla. —, 221 Pac. 718.
Original action by the State, on the relation of George P. Short, Attorney General, against Dan Kygar et al.
Dismissed,
George P. Short, Atty. Gen., for plaintiff.
England & Duvall, J. Q. Louthan, S. W. Hayes, and L. L. Oowley, for defendants.

Opinion:
KANE, J.
This is an original action in quo warranto, similar to original action No. 14409, State of Oklahoma ex rel. George F. Short, Attorney General, Plaintiff, v. O. P. Callahan, O. E. Hall, and J. W. Wiker, Defendants, in which an opinion this day has been handed down. As in the principal case, counsel for defendants also filed a demurrer to plaintiff's petition, upon which the cause now comes on -to be heard. Counsel for plaintiff have filed no separate brief in this cause, assuming, we presume, that the opinion in the principal case is decisive of the Question raised in this.
Counsel for the defendants in a reply brief, filed in the principal case,. called attention to the similarity of the two cases and pointed out some additional reasons why the demurrer to the petition herein should be sustained.
It appearing that the decision in the principal case is decisive of the question raised, the demurrer to the petition herein is sustained and the cause of action dismissed upon the authority of the principal case.
JOHNSON, C. J., and KENNAMER, NICHOLSON, and COCHRAN, JJ., concur.