Case Name: LEONARD ROTHMAN AND MILDRED ROTHMAN, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF HACKENSACK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1981-06-16
Citations: 4 N.J. Tax 529
Docket Number: 
Parties: LEONARD ROTHMAN AND MILDRED ROTHMAN, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF HACKENSACK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Tax Court Reports
Volume: 4
Pages: 529–530

Head Matter:
LEONARD ROTHMAN AND MILDRED ROTHMAN, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF HACKENSACK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued June 9, 1981
Decided June 16, 1981.
Before Judges MICHELS and KOLE.
Leonard Rothman argued the cause for appellants.
Steven Muhlstock argued the cause for respondent (Melvin Gittleman, attorney).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The Tax Court affirmed tax assessments by the county board of taxation affecting appellants' real property in Hackensack as follows:
PARCEL I -1978 only
Block Lots Land Improvements
100F 8,9,10 $ 20,000 -0-
PARCEL II -1978 and 1979
Block Lots Land Improvements
114A 1 $138,000 $100
114C 1-A and 3 95,400 -0-
According to appellants-taxpayers, their appeal is limited to the-Tax Court judgment relating only to Parcel II for the years 1978 and 1979.
We have considered the arguments advanced by the taxpayers on this appeal in the light of the proofs and applicable law. We have concluded that there is sufficient credible evidence in the record to support the Tax Court judge's determinations and that all issues of law raised are clearly without merit. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(A), (E).
We affirm the judgment substantially for the reasons given by Judge Simpson in his written opinion of August 26, 1980.
Affirmed.