Case Name: George Harkrider v. The State
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1905-10-25
Citations: 48 Tex. Crim. 573
Docket Number: No. 3288
Parties: George Harkrider v. The State.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Criminal Reports
Volume: 48
Pages: 573–574

Head Matter:
George Harkrider v. The State.
No. 3288.
Decided October 25, 1905.
local Option—Notice of Appeal—Recognizance.
In a misdemeanor case an appeal can only be taken by entering notice of appeal and recognizance upon the minutes of the court during the term of the court at which' conviction occurred, which cannot be done at a subsequent term.
Appeal from the County Court of Titus. Tried below before Hon. Sed. F. Caldwell.
Appeal from a conviction of violating the local option lay; penalty, a fine of $25 and twenty days confinement in the county jail.
The opinion states the case.
Ralston, Ward & Hutchings, for appellant.
Howard Martin, Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

Opinion:
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
Appellant was convicted of violating the local option law. In the record is what purports to be a statement of facts and bill of exceptions, but according to this record neither are filed in the trial court. Both instruments were approved by the county judge after the adjournment of the term. As the statement of facts and bill of exceptions are presented we cannot consider them. Without the consideration of these two instruments, this judgment must be affirmed.
Affirmed.
on rehearing.
December 13, 1905.