Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Andrew J. DANZELL, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-10-02
Citations: 698 F. App'x 93
Docket Number: No. 17-6572
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Andrew J. DANZELL, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 698
Pages: 93–94

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Andrew J. DANZELL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 17-6572
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: September 28, 2017
Decided: October 2, 2017
Andrew J. Danzell,' Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
' Andrew J. Danzell appeals the district court's order denying his petition for a writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and the district court's memorandum opinion and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. United States v. Danzell, Nos. 7:05-cv-00024-GEC-MFU-1; 7:09-cv-80196-GEC-MFU (W.D. Va. Apr. 13, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED