Case Name: Douglas C. CHARNOCK, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia; Edward W. Hanson, Jr.; Frederick B. Lowe, Jr., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-10-11
Citations: 698 F. App'x 158
Docket Number: No. 17-1049
Parties: Douglas C. CHARNOCK, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia; Edward W. Hanson, Jr.; Frederick B. Lowe, Jr., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 698
Pages: 158–158

Head Matter:
Douglas C. CHARNOCK, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia; Edward W. Hanson, Jr.; Frederick B. Lowe, Jr., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 17-1049
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: September 19, 2017
Decided: October 11, 2017
Michael D.J. Eisenberg, LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL D.J. EISENBERG, Washington, D.C., for Appellant.
Mark R. Herring, Attorney General of Virginia, Samuel T. Towell, Deputy Attorney General, Nicholas F. Simopoulos, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Christian A. Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Douglas C. Charnoek, Jr., appeals the district court's order granting defendants' motion to dismiss his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Charnock v. Virginia, No. 2:16-cv-00493-RAJ-LRL (E.D. Va. Jan. 5, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED