Case Name: George CLEVELAND, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Warden Willie EAGLETON, individually and in his official capacity; Associate Warden Roland McFadden, individually and in his official capacity; Officer M. Thomas; Unknown Nurse; Unknown Medical Doctor; All Employed At Evans Correctional, or a contract employee, Defendants-Appellees, and Evans Correctional Institution; IGC Angie Graves, individually and in her official capacity, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-12-08
Citations: 671 F. App'x 133
Docket Number: No. 16-6527
Parties: George CLEVELAND, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Warden Willie EAGLETON, individually and in his official capacity; Associate Warden Roland McFadden, individually and in his official capacity; Officer M. Thomas; Unknown Nurse; Unknown Medical Doctor; All Employed At Evans Correctional, or a contract employee, Defendants-Appellees, and Evans Correctional Institution; IGC Angie Graves, individually and in her official capacity, Defendants.
Judges: Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 671
Pages: 133–134

Head Matter:
George CLEVELAND, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Warden Willie EAGLETON, individually and in his official capacity; Associate Warden Roland McFadden, individually and in his official capacity; Officer M. Thomas; Unknown Nurse; Unknown Medical Doctor; All Employed At Evans Correctional, or a contract employee, Defendants-Appellees, and Evans Correctional Institution; IGC Angie Graves, individually and in her official capacity, Defendants.
No. 16-6527
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: November 30, 2016
Decided: December 8, 2016
George Cleveland, III, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel F. Arthur, III, Aiken, Bridges, Nunn, Elliott & Tyler, PA, Florence, South Carolina for Appellees.
Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
George Cleveland, III, appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cleveland v. Eagleton, No. 4:14-cv-02444-RBH, 2016 WL 859360 (D.S.C. Mar. 7, 2016). We grant Cleveland's motion to accept as timely filed his informal brief, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED