Case Name: Leighty et al. v. Renbarger
Court: Appellate Court of Indiana
Jurisdiction: Indiana
Decision Date: 1946-03-28
Citations: 116 Ind. App. 620
Docket Number: No. 17,469
Parties: Leighty et al. v. Renbarger
Judges: 
Reporter: Indiana Court of Appeals Reports
Volume: 116
Pages: 620–621

Head Matter:
Leighty et al. v. Renbarger
[No. 17,469.
Filed March 28, 1946.
Rehearing Denied April 26, 1946. Transfer Denied May 28, 1946.]
Dan M. Link, of Auburn, and Wm, J. Hull, of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellants.
Mountz & Mountz, of Garrett, for appellee.

Opinion:
Flanagan, C. J.
Appellee has filed herein a motion to dismiss this appeal on the ground that.no question for review has been presented.
The error relied upon for reversal is the overruling of. appellants' motion for a new trial which attempts to .challenge the sufficiency of the evidence and the legality of the decision. But appellants' brief does not contain the pleadings, the motion for a new trial, the judgment, nor a statement of the evidence in narrative form. No question is therefore presented. Rule 2-17, Rules of Supreme Court.
Appeal dismissed.
Norn — Reported in 65 N. E. (2d) 637.