Case Name: Sanjeev MALHOTRA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WATERGATE AT LANDMARK (WAL) CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, WAL Board of Directors and/or its assignees, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-10-28
Citations: 251 F. App'x 830
Docket Number: No. 07-1501
Parties: Sanjeev MALHOTRA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WATERGATE AT LANDMARK (WAL) CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, WAL Board of Directors and/or its assignees, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 251
Pages: 830–831

Head Matter:
Sanjeev MALHOTRA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WATERGATE AT LANDMARK (WAL) CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, WAL Board of Directors and/or its assignees, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 07-1501.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 12, 2007.
Decided: Oct. 28, 2007.
Sanjeev Malhotra, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Curtis Gartner, Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, LLP, Falls Church, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Sanjeev Malhotra appeals the district court's order's denying his motions to reopen and for sanctions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Malhotra v. Watergate at Landmark Condo. Assoc., No. 1:05-cv-00076-LMB (E.D. Va. Apr. 4 & 6, 2007). We deny Appellee's motion for sanctions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.