Case Name: Pamela Sue VESTER-BATES, Appellant-Employee, v. PONDEROSA STEAK HOUSE, Respondent-Employer
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-12-26
Citations: 209 S.W.3d 539
Docket Number: No. ED 88108
Parties: Pamela Sue VESTER-BATES, Appellant-Employee, v. PONDEROSA STEAK HOUSE, Respondent-Employer.
Judges: Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J„ and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 209
Pages: 539–539

Head Matter:
Pamela Sue VESTER-BATES, Appellant-Employee, v. PONDEROSA STEAK HOUSE, Respondent-Employer.
No. ED 88108.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Dec. 26, 2006.
Ray A. Gerritzen, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Mary Flanagan-Dean, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J„ and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant Pamela Sue Vester-Bates ("Vester-Bates") appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission ("Commission") after the Commission found that Vester-Bates was partially disabled while working for her employer, Respondent Ponderosa Steak House, and awarded her, inter alia, temporary total disability benefits of $79.67/ week.
We have thoroughly reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, and no error of law appears. Therefore, an opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been given a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).