Case Name: Santana, Appellee, v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1994-05-04
Citations: 69 Ohio St. 3d 182
Docket Number: No. 93-1349
Parties: Santana, Appellee, v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company, Appellant.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., AW. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Christley, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 69
Pages: 182–182

Head Matter:
Santana, Appellee, v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company, Appellant.
[Cite as Santana v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co. (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 182.]
(No. 93-1349
Submitted March 29, 1994
Decided May 4, 1994.)
Law Offices of Mollenkamp & Fisher, John B. Fisher and Alan L. Mollenkamp, for appellee.
Jones & Bahret Co., L.P.A, Robert J. Bahret and Keith J. Watkins, for appellant.

Opinion:
This cause is before this court upon the certification of the Court of Appeals for Lucas County that its judgment conflicted with the judgment of the Court of Appeals for Mahoning County in Miller v. Shelby Mut. Ins. Co. (1969), 20 Ohio App.2d 323, 49 O.O.2d 451, 253 N.E.2d 801.
Having examined Miller and the record in the present cause, we find that the judgments do not conflict. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. Copeco, Inc. v. Caley (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 79, 630 N.E.2d 662; Whitelock v. Gilbane Bldg. Co. (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 594, 613 N.E.2d 1032; Freeman v. Holzer Med. Ctr. (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 601, 613 N.E.2d 1037; State v. Parobek (1990) 49 Ohio St.3d 61, 550 N.E.2d 476; State v. Radar (1989), 47 Ohio St.3d 112, 548 N.E.2d 210; Hays v. St. Elizabeth Hosp. Med. Ctr. (1988), 38 Ohio St.3d 60, 526 N.E.2d 307; Cook v. Mayfield (1988), 37 Ohio St.3d 44, 523 N.E.2d 502; State v. Palider (1987), 33 Ohio St.3d 68, 514 N.E.2d 873.
Moyer, C.J., AW. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Christley, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Judith A Christley, J., of the Eleventh Appellate District, sitting for Resnick, J.