Case Name: JOHN F. EDGAR et al., Respondents, v. FRANK CITRARO, Appellant
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1929-12-16
Citations: 102 Cal. App. 795
Docket Number: Civ. No. 7070
Parties: JOHN F. EDGAR et al., Respondents, v. FRANK CITRARO, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports
Volume: 102
Pages: 795–796

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 7070.
First Appellate District, Division One.
December 16, 1929.]
JOHN F. EDGAR et al., Respondents, v. FRANK CITRARO, Appellant.
Cooley, Crowley & Gallagher, Hartley F. Peart and Gus C. Baraty for Appellant.
Vincent W. Hallinan for Respondents.

Opinion:
THE COURT.
Respondents move this court to strike the transcript on appeal and appellant's opening brief from the files of this court and to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that said transcript was transmitted to this court in violation of an order theretofore made by the Superior Court terminating the proceedings to procure the transcript. The motion is based upon the identical facts and circumstances involved in a similar motion made by respondents in a companion case, and which motion has this day been denied. (Edgar et al. v. Citraro et al. (No. 7069) ante, p. 545 [283 Pac. 123].) Therefore, upon the grounds and for the reasons set forth in the decision in the companion proceeding, the motion herein is denied.