Case Name: Charles Sirota, Respondent, v. Joseph Shacknovitz and Others, Appellants, Impleaded with Another, Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1925-02
Citations: 212 A.D. 884
Docket Number: 
Parties: Charles Sirota, Respondent, v. Joseph Shacknovitz and Others, Appellants, Impleaded with Another, Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 212
Pages: 884–884

Head Matter:
Charles Sirota, Respondent, v. Joseph Shacknovitz and Others, Appellants, Impleaded with Another, Defendant.

Opinion:
Upon reargument, judgment reversed on the law, and a now trial granted, with costs to abide the event, upon authority of Happel v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co. (210 App. Div. 461) and O'Connor v. Webber (239 N. Y. 191). Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox and Young, JJ., concur, Kelby, J., dissents on the ground that the situation presented in the .case at bar is different from the Happel ease.