Case Name: Alvin SIMMONS, T. A. Wilks, W. A. Jackson, Robert Lee Newman, D. C. Ray, Sylvester Warren, W. C. Poke, Local 1454, International Union, United Automobile Aerospace Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW) AFL-CIO, International Union, United Automobile Aerospace, Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW) AFL-CIO, Petitioners, v. Lewis McLEOD, Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1969-05-29
Citations: 223 So. 2d 66
Docket Number: No. K-363
Parties: Alvin SIMMONS, T. A. Wilks, W. A. Jackson, Robert Lee Newman, D. C. Ray, Sylvester Warren, W. C. Poke, Local 1454, International Union, United Automobile Aerospace Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW) AFL-CIO, International Union, United Automobile Aerospace, Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW) AFL-CIO, Petitioners, v. Lewis McLEOD, Respondent.
Judges: CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and RAWLS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 223
Pages: 66–67

Head Matter:
Alvin SIMMONS, T. A. Wilks, W. A. Jackson, Robert Lee Newman, D. C. Ray, Sylvester Warren, W. C. Poke, Local 1454, International Union, United Automobile Aerospace Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW) AFL-CIO, International Union, United Automobile Aerospace, Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW) AFL-CIO, Petitioners, v. Lewis McLEOD, Respondent.
No. K-363.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.
May 29, 1969.
Frank & Grandoff for petitioners.
Hodges, Bergen & Gafford, Lake City, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The defendants in an action for damages have filed a petition for writ of common-law certiorari, seeking our review of an order entered by the Circuit Court for Columbia County, requiring them to answer certain interrogatories propounded by the respondent-plaintiff. Oral argument having been heard, the briefs and record having been read and considered, we are of the opinion that the petitioners have failed to demonstrate that the said order fails to comply with the essential requirements of the law, so the petition is denied without prejudice.
CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and RAWLS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.