Case Name: David MISHLER, et al., Appellants, v. Richard ZAKHEIM, M.D., et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-09-28
Citations: 625 So. 2d 81
Docket Number: No. 92-2499
Parties: David MISHLER, et al., Appellants, v. Richard ZAKHEIM, M.D., et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and NESBITT, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 625
Pages: 81–81

Head Matter:
David MISHLER, et al., Appellants, v. Richard ZAKHEIM, M.D., et al., Appellees.
No. 92-2499.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Sept. 28, 1993.
Rehearing Denied Oct. 29, 1993.
Ward & Caggiano, Karen J. Haas, Miami, for appellants.
Burt E. Redlus, James C. Blecke, Blackwell & Walker and James E. Tribble, Miami, George V. Lanza, Coral Gables, Magill & Lewis and Fred Lewis, Miami, for appellees.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and NESBITT, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Because we find clear error in the trial court's exclusion of the testimony of the plaintiffs' proposed expert witnesses under section 766.102, Florida Statutes (1991), the summary judgment entered below on that basis is reversed and the cause is remanded for trial as to all defendants.