Case Name: STRYKER CORPORATION, Stryker Puerto Rico, Ltd., Stryker Sales Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees v. ZIMMER, INC., Zimmer Surgical, Inc., Defendants-Appellants Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-03-23
Citations: 596 F. App'x 924
Docket Number: No. 2013-1668
Parties: STRYKER CORPORATION, Stryker Puerto Rico, Ltd., Stryker Sales Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees v. ZIMMER, INC., Zimmer Surgical, Inc., Defendants-Appellants Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Defendant.
Judges: Before PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, LOURIE, DYK, MOORE, O’MALLEY, REYNA, WALLACH, TARANTO, CHEN, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 596
Pages: 924–924

Head Matter:
STRYKER CORPORATION, Stryker Puerto Rico, Ltd., Stryker Sales Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees v. ZIMMER, INC., Zimmer Surgical, Inc., Defendants-Appellants Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Defendant.
No. 2013-1668.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
March 23, 2015.
Sharon Hwang, Deborah Laughton, Caroline Teichner, Attorney McAndrews, Held & Malloy, Ltd., Chicago, IL, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.
Donald Robert Dunner, Benjamin Thomas Sirolly, Kara F. Stoll, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC, for Defendants-Appellants.
Before PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, LOURIE, DYK, MOORE, O’MALLEY, REYNA, WALLACH, TARANTO, CHEN, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
PER CURIAM.
Appellees Stryker Corporation, Stryker Puerto Rico, Ltd., and Stryker Sales Corporation filed a petition for rehearing en banc. A response to the petition was invited by the court and filed by appellants Zimmer, Inc. and Zimmer Surgical, Inc. Leave to file a reply was granted, and a reply was filed by the appellees. The petition was initially referred to the panel that heard the appeal. In a separate order issued today, the panel withdrew the opinion and replaced it with a revised opinion.
The petition, response, reply, and revised opinion were referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service.
Upon consideration thereof,
It Is Ordered That:
(1) The petition for rehearing en banc is denied.
(2) The mandate of the court will issue March 30, 2015.