Case Name: EMMA M. LEBKUECKER, RESPONDENT, v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1922-10-06
Citations: 98 N.J.L. 271
Docket Number: 
Parties: EMMA M. LEBKUECKER, RESPONDENT, v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 98
Pages: 271–271

Head Matter:
EMMA M. LEBKUECKER, RESPONDENT, v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT.
Submitted July 10, 1022
Decided October 6, 1922.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion, is reported in 97 N. J. L. 112.
For the respondent, Gustav Haussling.
For the appellant, Wall, Haight, Carey & Hartpence.

Opinion:
Pee Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Katzenbaeh in the Supreme Court.
For affirm,anee — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchabd, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalis ch, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Yan Bus-kirk, JJ. 18.
For reversal — None.