Case Name: Jorge Cruz RAMIREZ; Felicitas Lopez Zuniga, Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-07-27
Citations: 235 F. App'x 527
Docket Number: No. 05-74077
Parties: Jorge Cruz RAMIREZ; Felicitas Lopez Zuniga, Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: THOMPSON, BERZON, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 235
Pages: 527–528

Head Matter:
Jorge Cruz RAMIREZ; Felicitas Lopez Zuniga, Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 05-74077.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted June 5, 2007.
Filed July 27, 2007.
Gordon T. Yang, Esq., Attorney at Law, Waipahu, HI, for Petitioners.
District Director, Office of the District, Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Honolulu, HI, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Janice K. Redfern, Esq., DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: THOMPSON, BERZON, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
We previously vacated submission of this petition for review pending the resolution of No. 04-72701, Singh v. Gonzales. In this case, as in Singh, the Board of Immigration Appeals relied on a transmittal sheet to establish that its decision was correctly mailed, without assessing the impact of declarations of non-receipt submitted with petitioners' motion to reopen. Accordingly, we remand for reconsideration of their motion. See Singh, 494 F.3d 1170, 2007 WL 2050954 (9th Cir.2007).
PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.