Case Name: AGNES SCHUNCK, AN INFANT, ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1934-04-12
Citations: 112 N.J.L. 500
Docket Number: 
Parties: AGNES SCHUNCK, AN INFANT, ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 112
Pages: 500–500

Head Matter:
AGNES SCHUNCK, AN INFANT, ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLANT.
Submitted February 16, 1934
Decided April 12, 1934.
For the respondents, Rosario 8. Mazzola.
For the appellant, William A. Barhalow.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, .Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.