Case Name: The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Meadows, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1992-03-04
Citations: 63 Ohio St. 3d 135
Docket Number: No. 91-1080
Parties: The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Meadows, Appellant.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Holmes, Douglas and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 63
Pages: 135–135

Head Matter:
The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Meadows, Appellant.
[Cite as State v. Meadows (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 135.]
(No. 91-1080
Submitted February 11, 1992
Decided March 4, 1992.)
Arthur M. Ney, Jr., Prosecuting Attorney, and Leonard Kirschner, for appellee.
Randall M. Dana, Ohio Public Defender, and Wendie A. Gerus, for appellant.

Opinion:
The cause is affirmed on the authority of State v. Murnahan (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 60, 584 N.E.2d 1204. However, defendant-appellant may file for delayed reconsideration of his ineffectiveness-of-counsel claim in the Hamilton County Court of Appeals.
Moyer, C.J., Holmes, Douglas and Resnick, JJ., concur.