Case Name: ROBERTS ROOFING COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Robert L. SMITH, and Suzanne Smith, his wife, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-09-15
Citations: 605 So. 2d 167
Docket Number: No. 92-598
Parties: ROBERTS ROOFING COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Robert L. SMITH, and Suzanne Smith, his wife, Appellees.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and FERGUSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 605
Pages: 167–167

Head Matter:
ROBERTS ROOFING COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Robert L. SMITH, and Suzanne Smith, his wife, Appellees.
No. 92-598.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Sept. 15, 1992.
Rehearing Denied Oct. 20, 1992.
Douglas A. McDuff, Coral Gables, and Rufus C. Sundie, Miami, for appellant.
Holden & Holden, and Francis E. Holden, Jr., Hialeah, for appellees.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and FERGUSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The trial judge's findings of fact in a nonjury trial will not be disturbed where they are supported by competent and substantial evidence even if that evidence is disputed. Antun Invests. Corp. v. Ergas, 549 So.2d 706 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Ren-Del Enters., Inc. v. Florida Keys First State Bank, 539 So.2d 541 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Laufer v. Norma Fashions, Inc., 418 So.2d 437 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). Competent and substantial evidence was presented that the appellant breached the roof repair contract and, for that reason, was not entitled to a judgment of foreclosure on its mechanic's lien.
Affirmed.