Case Name: Victor Khanin et al., Appellants, v. Roselle Cohan, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2002-05-28
Citations: 294 A.D.2d 542
Docket Number: 
Parties: Victor Khanin et al., Appellants, v Roselle Cohan, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 294
Pages: 542–543

Head Matter:
Victor Khanin et al., Appellants, v Roselle Cohan, Respondent.
[742 NYS2d 878]

Opinion:
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Carter, J.), entered May 21, 2001, which granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that neither of them sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.
Assuming that the defendant made out a prima facie case for summary judgment establishing her entitlement to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the complaint on the ground that neither plaintiff sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955), the plaintiffs' opposition papers were sufficient to raise an issue of fact (see Kim v Cohen, 208 AD2d 807; cf. Grossman v Wright, 268 AD2d 79, 84). Prudenti, P.J., S. Miller, O'Brien, McGinity and Crane, JJ., concur.