Case Name: Edwin OYOLA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-06-19
Citations: 600 So. 2d 1273
Docket Number: No. 91-02822
Parties: Edwin OYOLA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SCHOONOVER, C.J., and HALL and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 600
Pages: 1273–1274

Head Matter:
Edwin OYOLA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 91-02822.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
June 19, 1992.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Kevin Briggs, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Peggy A. Quince, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the appellant's judgments and sentences. The appellant contends, and the appellee agrees, that the trial court erred in imposing restitution without allowing the appellant to present evidence concerning his ability to pay. Pope v. State, 575 So.2d 307 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). Accordingly, we reverse the restitution order and remand for another restitution hearing.
SCHOONOVER, C.J., and HALL and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.