Case Name: Elizabeth Chudnowsky, Appellant, v. Re-Mo Holding Corporation et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1949-03-03
Citations: 298 N.Y. 904
Docket Number: 
Parties: Elizabeth Chudnowsky, Appellant, v. Re-Mo Holding Corporation et al., Respondents.
Judges: Concur: Loughban, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, DesmoNd, Dye and Fuld, JJ.
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 298
Pages: 904–906

Head Matter:
Elizabeth Chudnowsky, Appellant, v. Re-Mo Holding Corporation et al., Respondents.
Argued January 5, 1949;
decided March 3, 1949.
Murray A. Gordon and Herbert J. Fabricant for appellant.
Louis Gusman and Harold A. Diamond for respondents.

Opinion:
Judgments reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the evidence presents an issue of fact-as to whether the agreement, by which the plaintiff purchased the apartment building in suit, was induced by fraudulent representations of the defendant. No opinion.
Concur: Loughban, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, DesmoNd, Dye and Fuld, JJ.