Case Name: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Gregory Houston HOLT, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-09-09
Citations: 114 F. App'x 762
Docket Number: No. 03-3141
Parties: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Gregory Houston HOLT, Appellant.
Judges: Before WOLLMAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 114
Pages: 762–763

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Gregory Houston HOLT, Appellant.
No. 03-3141.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 13, 2004.
Decided: Sept. 9, 2004.
Kevin T. Alexander, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Little Rock, AR, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Christopher A. Tarver, Omar F. Greene, II, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Little Rock, AR, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before WOLLMAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Gregory Houston Holt appeals the sentence imposed by the district court upon the revocation of his supervised release. We affirm.
Holt pled guilty to possession of a firearm with no serial number, a class D felony, and was sentenced to three years of probation. See 18 U.S.C. § 922(k). After violating his probation, Holt was sentenced to six months in prison and 24 months of supervised release. He violated the conditions of his supervised release in August 2003, whereupon the district court revoked his release and imposed a sentence of 18 months imprisonment followed by 18 months of additional supervised release. Holt contends, citing United States v. St. John, 92 F.3d 761, 766-67 (8th Cir.1996), that because he was given 24 months of supervised release after his probation violation, the additional imprisonment and supervised release ordered upon revocation must be capped at 24 months.
We rejected an identical argument in U.S. v. Palmer, No. 03-1333, 2004 WL 1878356 (8th Cir. Aug 24, 2004) (en banc), and overruled St. John's interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) and (h). We concluded that a defendant may be sentenced to a term of imprisonment and a further term of supervised release which, in the aggregate, do not exceed the term of supervised release authorized by statute for the offense that resulted in the original term of supervised release. Palmer, 380 F.3d 393, 2004 WL 1878356, at *3. Here, because the underlying offense is a class D felony, a term of supervised release of up to three years is authorized by 18 U.S.C. § 3583(b)(2). Accordingly, the district court did not err in sentencing Holt to terms of imprisonment and supervised release totaling 36 months.
The judgment is affirmed.
. The Honorable George Howard, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.