Case Name: William MENDOZA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-04-06
Citations: 616 So. 2d 589
Docket Number: No. 93-508
Parties: William MENDOZA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and GERSTEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 616
Pages: 589–590

Head Matter:
William MENDOZA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 93-508.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 6, 1993.
Rehearing Denied May 11, 1993.
William Mendoza, in pro. per.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and GERSTEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, William Mendoza, appeals the summary denial of his Rule 3.850 motion for post conviction relief. We affirm.
Appellant filed a motion for post-conviction relief contending that his guilty plea was involuntarily entered. The trial court summarily denied the motion because the grounds raised were either legally insufficient or refuted by the record. We agree that appellant's claim is conclusively refuted by the record and plea colloquy attached to appellant's motion. Agan v. State, 503 So.2d 1254 (Fla.1987). We affirm the denial of Mendoza's motion for post-conviction relief.
Affirmed.