Case Name: In re: James E. REID, Debtor. James E. Reid, Debtor-Appellant, v. Knarf Investments, Creditor-Appellee, and Ellen W. Cosby, Trustee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-11-28
Citations: 383 F. App'x 743
Docket Number: No. 07-1588
Parties: In re: James E. REID, Debtor. James E. Reid, Debtor—Appellant, v. Knarf Investments, Creditor—Appellee, and Ellen W. Cosby, Trustee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Bankruptcy Reporter
Volume: 383
Pages: 743–743

Head Matter:
In re: James E. REID, Debtor. James E. Reid, Debtor—Appellant, v. Knarf Investments, Creditor—Appellee, and Ellen W. Cosby, Trustee.
No. 07-1588.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 20, 2007.
Decided: Nov. 28, 2007.
James E. Reid, Appellant Pro Se. Patricia Ann Borenstein, Miles & Stock-bridge, P.C., Baltimore, Maryland, for Ap-pellee.
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James E. Reid appeals the district court's orders dismissing his appeals from the bankruptcy court and denying his motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Reid v. Knarf Investments, Nos. 1:06-cv-02582BEL; BK-01-50422 (D. Md. Apr. 5, 2007; Apr. 17, 2007; Apr. 30, 2007; May 18, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reid has filed a motion to incorporate a decision of the bankruptcy court that was entered after he noted this appeal. We deny the motion but have forwarded it the district court to be docketed as a notice of appeal of the September 28, 2007, order pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 4(d).