Case Name: In the INTEREST OF: A.N., D.T., D.N., D.T., D.T., and J.T.; Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. C.T. (Mother), Appellant.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2018-11-20
Citations: 569 S.W.3d 445
Docket Number: WD 81803
Parties: In the INTEREST OF: A.N., D.T., D.N., D.T., D.T., and J.T.;
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 569
Pages: 445–445

Head Matter:
In the INTEREST OF: A.N., D.T., D.N., D.T., D.T., and J.T.;
Juvenile Officer, Respondent,
v.
C.T. (Mother), Appellant.
WD 81803
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Filed: November 20, 2018
Anastacia R. Adamson, Lori A. Fluegel, Kathleen M. Hunter, Kansas City for respondents.
Michael B. Lester, Overland Park for appellant.
Before Division One: Lisa White Hardwick, Presiding Judge, Edward R. Ardini, Jr. and Thomas N. Chapman, Judges
ORDER

Opinion:
Per Curiam
C.T. appeals the judgment terminating parental rights to her six children. She contends the evidence was insufficient to support termination on the grounds of abuse and neglect, failure to rectify, and parental unfitness. She also argues the evidence was insufficient to find that termination of her parental rights is in the children's best interest. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the circuit court's judgment.
AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b)