Case Name: Maria T. CURIEL and Martin L. Curiel, Respondents, v. HAMPTON COUNTY E.M.S., Petitioner
Court: Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jurisdiction: South Carolina
Decision Date: 2015-02-11
Citations: 411 S.C. 426
Docket Number: Appellate Case No. 2013-000391; No. 27496
Parties: Maria T. CURIEL and Martin L. Curiel, Respondents, v. HAMPTON COUNTY E.M.S., Petitioner.
Judges: TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: South Carolina Reports
Volume: 411
Pages: 426–427

Head Matter:
768 S.E.2d 669
Maria T. CURIEL and Martin L. Curiel, Respondents, v. HAMPTON COUNTY E.M.S., Petitioner.
Appellate Case No. 2013-000391.
No. 27496.
Supreme Court of South Carolina.
Heard Jan. 15, 2015.
Decided Feb. 11, 2015.
E. Mitchell Griffith and Mary E. Sharp, both of Griffith, Sadler & Sharp, P.A., of Beaufort, for Petitioner.
John S. Nichols, of Bluestein, Nichols, Thompson & Delgado, LLC, of Columbia, and H. Woodrow Gooding and Mark B. Tinsley, both of Gooding & Gooding, P.A., of Allendale, for Respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We granted certiorari to review the Court of Appeals' decision in Curiel v. Hampton County E.M.S., 401 S.C. 646, 737 S.E.2d 854 (Ct.App.2012). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.
TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ., concur.