Case Name: Mae Moore, Respondent, v. Moore Mica Paint Company and Others, Defendants, Impleaded with David Proskey, President, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1912-05-01
Citations: 150 A.D. 792
Docket Number: 
Parties: Mae Moore, Respondent, v. Moore Mica Paint Company and Others, Defendants, Impleaded with David Proskey, President, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 150
Pages: 792–794

Head Matter:
Mae Moore, Respondent, v. Moore Mica Paint Company and Others, Defendants, Impleaded with David Proskey, President, Appellant.
Second Department,
May 1, 1912.
Corporations — action by stockholder to recover stock fraudulently issued — injunction against officers pendente lite.
Where the plaintiff, a stockholder in a corporation, complains of the issue of capital stock to the wife of the president of the corporation, without consideration and by connivance of the president, in order to deprive the plaintiff of a controlling interest, and asks for the cancellation and return to the treasury of the stock so issued, the Special Term, upon a contested motion, cannot stay the officers, directors and agents of the corporation “from exercising any corporate management or proprietorship whatever or interfering in any way with the management of the business of the said corporation until the final determination of this action.”
The court in such an action may arrest the officers in some proposed course or halt them in the doing of some specific act, but it cannot grant an order practically winding up the corporation pendente lite, or vesting corporate powers in a mere stockholder.
Appeal by the defendant, David Proskey, president, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Orange Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kockland on the 10th day of November, 1911.
Emanuel Tepper [Marshall A. Barney and Lewis Schuldenfrei with him on the brief], for the appellant.
Mortimer B. Patterson, for the respondent.

Opinion:
Jenks, P. J.:
This appeal is from an order that denies a motion to vacate an injunction order. The plaintiff as stockholder in a corporation complains against the corporation and its officers of an issue of the capital stock out of the treasury to the defendant M. V. H. Proskey, the wife of the president of the corporation, without consideration, and by connivance of the president, in order that M. V. H. Proskey and her son, the defendant D. V: Proskey, treasurer of the corporation, could secure the controlling interest and a majority of the capital stock, of "which this plaintiff had control " before such issue. The specific relief asked-was the surrender of the certificate issued to the defendant M. V. H. Proskey for cancellation and return to the treasury. There was also a prayer for any appropriate general relief.
The Special Term upon a contested motion made an order that inter alia provided that the application to stay the officers and directors of the defendant and then* attorneys, servants or agents "from exercising any corporate management or proprietorship whatever or interfering in any way with the management of the business of the said corporation until the final determination of this action " be granted, provided the plaintiff file a bond in the sum of $1,000 securing the defendant corporation and D. Proskey and D. Y. Proskey, as officers and directors thereof, "for the faithful accounting to the said parties for the assets of the " corporation, "now or heretofore in the hands of the said " plaintiff " or hereafter received by her."
The order is too drastic. Presumably the power • of managing the business of a corporation is vested solely in its officers and directors. (Morawetz Corp. [2d ed.] § 511 and cases cited, including Conro v. Port Henry Iron Co., 12 Barb. 27.) The court may arrest such officers in some proposed course or halt them in the doing of some specific act, but it cannot in such an action as the one at bar virtually remove the directors, for it thereby practically winds up the corporation pendente lite, or, if not, it vests some of the corporate powers in a mere stockholder by virtue of such status, which it cannot do. (See Cook Oorp. § 746 and cases cited.)
The order must be reversed,- with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion must be granted, with $10 costs. .
Hirschbeeg, Thomas, Carr and Woodward, JJ., concurred.
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, With ten dollars costs.