Case Name: In the Interest of D.C.G., a minor. Jacquelyn Belinda Perkins, Respondent, v. N.M.G., Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-12-26
Citations: 34 S.W.3d 853
Docket Number: No. ED 77436
Parties: In the Interest of D.C.G., a minor. Jacquelyn Belinda Perkins, Respondent, v. N.M.G., Appellant.
Judges: Before CRANE, P.J., JAMES R. DOWD, J., and ROBERT E. CRIST, Sr.J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 34
Pages: 853–854

Head Matter:
In the Interest of D.C.G., a minor. Jacquelyn Belinda Perkins, Respondent, v. N.M.G., Appellant.
No. ED 77436.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Dec. 26, 2000.
Connie S. Hood, Clayton, for appellant.
Rita M. Montgomery, Montgomery Hollie & Associates, L.L.C., St. Louis, for respondent.
Before CRANE, P.J., JAMES R. DOWD, J., and ROBERT E. CRIST, Sr.J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Mother appeals from the judgment of the trial court terminating her parental rights to her child. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).