Case Name: Marie E. BARWICK, Petitioner v. Hinda S. MANHEIM, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1951-06-07
Citations: 189 F.2d 702
Docket Number: Misc. No. 285
Parties: Marie E. BARWICK, Petitioner v. Hinda S. MANHEIM, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 189
Pages: 702–702

Head Matter:
Marie E. BARWICK, Petitioner v. Hinda S. MANHEIM, Respondent.
Misc. No. 285.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued May 24, 1951.
Decided June 7, 1951.
Jo V. Morgan, Jr., Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
James M. Desmond, Washington, D. C., with whom Roy B. Kelly, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for respondent.
Before EDGERTON and BAZELON, Circuit Judges, and ARTHUR F. LEDERLE, District Judge sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The petition for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is denied. Wells v. United States, 318 U.S. 257, 63 S.Ct. 582, 87 L.Ed. 746; Newman v. United States, 87 U.S.App.D.C. 419, 184 F.2d 275.