Case Name: Emmett HURT and Dorothy Hurt, his wife, Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. Peggy ANDERSON, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-12-17
Citations: 92 S.W.3d 308
Docket Number: No. ED 80742
Parties: Emmett HURT and Dorothy Hurt, his wife, Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. Peggy ANDERSON, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, C.J., and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., and MARY R. RUSSELL, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 92
Pages: 308–308

Head Matter:
Emmett HURT and Dorothy Hurt, his wife, Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. Peggy ANDERSON, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 80742.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Southern Division.
Dec. 17, 2002.
Clinton B. Roberts, Sonya D. Day, Farmington, MO, for appellant.
David L. Mayhugh, Park Hills, MO, for respondent.
Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, C.J., and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., and MARY R. RUSSELL, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Peggy Anderson (Defendant) appeals from the trial court's judgment and order denying her motion to set aside the default judgment entered against her. Defendant argues the trial court (1) abused its discretion by erroneously applying a "free from negligence" standard in violation of Rule 74.05, (2) erred in finding that Defendant failed to show good cause, and (3) erred in finding that Defendant failed to establish a meritorious defense. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).