Case Name: Sarah Butensky, Appellant, v. Herman D. Goldberg, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1933-11
Citations: 240 A.D. 892
Docket Number: 
Parties: Sarah Butensky, Appellant, v. Herman D. Goldberg, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 240
Pages: 892–892

Head Matter:
Sarah Butensky, Appellant, v. Herman D. Goldberg, Respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event. There was a question of fact as to the negligence of defendant. (Greenley v. Miller's, Incorporated, 111 Conn. 584.) Lazansky, P. J., Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur; Kapper and Hagarty, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm. (Wein v. Woolworth Co., 223 App. Div. 794; Woolworth & Co. v. Conboy, 170 Fed. 934; Lord v. Sherer Dry Goods Co., 205 Mass. 1.)