Case Name: Jose BOQUE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-01-03
Citations: 666 So. 2d 566
Docket Number: No. 95-1035
Parties: Jose BOQUE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before GERSTEN, GODERICH and GREEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 666
Pages: 566–566

Head Matter:
Jose BOQUE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 95-1035.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan. 3, 1996.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 7, 1996.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Howard K. Blumberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Fleur J. Lobree, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before GERSTEN, GODERICH and GREEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The defendant appeals from his conviction and sentence raising two issues.
As to the first issue, we find it was not properly preserved by contemporaneous objection for appellate review. Castor v. State, 365 So.2d 701, 703 (Fla.1978). In the instant case, the jury requested a re-instruction on the area of intent. The State made a suggestion as to the scope of the instruction, while the defense made another. When the trial court adopted the State's position and announced its intention to proceed in this manner, the defense should have objected, but did not.
As to the second issue, we find that it lacks merit.
Accordingly, we affirm.