Case Name: Susan T. MYER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carolyn BOOSE; Unknown Defendants; James Cooke, Jr., individually and in his official capacity, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-08-25
Citations: 196 F. App'x 144
Docket Number: No. 05-1846
Parties: Susan T. MYER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Carolyn BOOSE; Unknown Defendants; James Cooke, Jr., individually and in his official capacity, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 196
Pages: 144–144

Head Matter:
Susan T. MYER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Carolyn BOOSE; Unknown Defendants; James Cooke, Jr., individually and in his official capacity, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 05-1846.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 9, 2006.
Decided: Aug. 25, 2006.
Susan T. Myer, Appellant Pro Se. Bryce Denman Neier, Law Office of Bryce D. Neier, Fayetteville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Susan T. Myer appeals the district court's orders dismissing her civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and denying her motion to alter or amend the judgment. Myer's federal complaint has its genesis in a real estate sale that was part of state divorce and equitable distribution proceedings. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Myer v. Cooke, No. CA-04-258-5 (E.D.N.C. June 29, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.