Case Name: GEORGE E. PENNINGTON v. TOWN OF TARBORO
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 1920-12-01
Citations: 180 N.C. 438
Docket Number: 
Parties: GEORGE E. PENNINGTON v. TOWN OF TARBORO.
Judges: Biiown, J., concurs in this opinion.
Reporter: North Carolina Reports
Volume: 180
Pages: 438–440

Head Matter:
GEORGE E. PENNINGTON v. TOWN OF TARBORO.
(Filed 1 December, 1920.)
(Por digest, see Kornegay v. Goldsboro, post, 441.)
CiARK, O. J., dissenting.
Appeal by plaintiffs from Connor, J., heard at chambers, 9 October, 1920, on case agreed, from Edgecombe.
This is an action to restrain the sale of bonds at less than par, as the defendant was authorized to do by an act of' the General Assembly enacted at the Special Session, 1920.
There was a judgment in favor of the defendant, and' the plaintiff appealed.
Allsbroolc & Philips for plaintiff.
Lon Gilliam and J. L. Morehead for defendant.

Opinion:
AlleN, J.
This appeal is controlled by tbe decision in Kornegay v. Goldsboro, at this term, and upon that authority the judgment is
Affirmed.