Case Name: The LAW OFFICE OF DARIO DIAZ, P.A., Appellant, v. FIRSTBANK FLORIDA, et al., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2012-08-17
Citations: 94 So. 3d 710
Docket Number: No. 5D11-2263
Parties: The LAW OFFICE OF DARIO DIAZ, P.A., Appellant, v. FIRSTBANK FLORIDA, et al., Appellee.
Judges: SAWAYA, TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 94
Pages: 710–711

Head Matter:
The LAW OFFICE OF DARIO DIAZ, P.A., Appellant, v. FIRSTBANK FLORIDA, et al., Appellee.
No. 5D11-2263.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Aug. 17, 2012.
David D. Sharpe of The Law Office of Dario Diaz, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.
Otto E. Berges and Cherish A. Thompson of Thompson Berges, P.A., Miami, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the award of attorney's fees against Appellant because the trial court failed to set forth detailed factual findings describing the specific bad faith conduct that resulted in the unnecessary incur-rence of attorney's fees. We remand this cause for further proceedings. See Moakley v. Smallwood, 826 So.2d 221, 227 (Fla.2002).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
SAWAYA, TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.