Case Name: Robert F. CROWELL, Administrator of the Estate of Marc Ethan Crowell, Deceased and Robert F. Crowell and Linda Crowell, as Plaintiffs in their own right, Petitioners, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and Henry B. Lewis and Robert F. Crowell; Robert F. CROWELL, Administrator of the Estate of Marc Ethan Crowell, Deceased and Robert F. Crowell and Linda Crowell, in their own right, Petitioners, v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania and City of Philadelphia and Henry B. Lewis and The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1990-11-07
Citations: 525 Pa. 550
Docket Number: Appeal No. 226 E.D. Allocatur Docket 1990
Parties: Robert F. CROWELL, Administrator of the Estate of Marc Ethan Crowell, Deceased and Robert F. Crowell and Linda Crowell, as Plaintiffs in their own right, Petitioners, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and Henry B. Lewis and Robert F. Crowell. Robert F. CROWELL, Administrator of the Estate of Marc Ethan Crowell, Deceased and Robert F. Crowell and Linda Crowell, in their own right, Petitioners, v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania and City of Philadelphia and Henry B. Lewis and The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia.
Judges: 
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 525
Pages: 550–550

Head Matter:
582 A.2d 1311
Robert F. CROWELL, Administrator of the Estate of Marc Ethan Crowell, Deceased and Robert F. Crowell and Linda Crowell, as Plaintiffs in their own right, Petitioners, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and Henry B. Lewis and Robert F. Crowell. Robert F. CROWELL, Administrator of the Estate of Marc Ethan Crowell, Deceased and Robert F. Crowell and Linda Crowell, in their own right, Petitioners, v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania and City of Philadelphia and Henry B. Lewis and The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Nov. 7, 1990.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
And Now, this 7th day of November, 1990, this Petition is granted, No. 185 E.D. Appeal Docket 1990, limited to the issue of the interpretation of 42 Pa.C.S. § 8542(b) in light of our decision in Mascaro v. Youth Study Center, 514 Pa. 351, 523 A.2d 1118 (1987).