Case Name: In the Matter of Legislative Conference of the City University of New York, Appellant, v. Board of Higher Education of the City of New York, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1972-12-29
Citations: 31 N.Y.2d 926
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Legislative Conference of the City University of New York, Appellant, v. Board of Higher Education of the City of New York, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 31
Pages: 926–928

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Legislative Conference of the City University of New York, Appellant, v. Board of Higher Education of the City of New York, Respondent.
Argued November 29, 1972;
decided December 29, 1972.
Alan F. Perl, Stephen H. Sturm and Daniel Meyer for appellant.
Norman Redlich, Corporation Counsel (Mary P. Rass and • Stanley Buchsbaum of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
Order affirmed, without costs. The offer of the Board as incorporated in the Appellate Division opinion appears to be a viable solution. Grievant would have one terminal year in the post of lecturer and the Board would be required to follow " established procedures ' ' in re-evaluating the grievant. Thereupon, if grievant is found worthy of appointment to the faculty, benefits can be awarded to the grievant retroactively.
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson.