Case Name: In the Matter of the final judicial settlement of the Estate of George Mapes, Dec'd
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1889-12-09
Citations: 28 N.Y. St. Rep. 634
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the final judicial settlement of the Estate of George Mapes, Dec’d.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 28
Pages: 634–635

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the final judicial settlement of the Estate of George Mapes, Dec’d.
(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department,
Filed December 9, 1889.)
Wills—Residuary legatee dying before life tenant.
Testator devised a life estate to his son, with remainder to his children, and gave the residue, including lapsed legacies, to his daughter. The son died childless after the daughter. Held, that the intention to include all testator’s property and interest in the residuary clause was clear, and that the property bequeathed to the son passed under the residuary clause to the executors of the daughter.
Appeal from decree of surrogate, directing payment of a certain fund to the executors of Sarah J. Mapes.
Testator’s will was as follows:
“ Second. I give and bequeath to my said son, John S., the use or interest of $5,000 (reduced to $4,000 by the codicil) for and during the term of his natural life, etc., etc., and at the death of my said son, John S., I give and bequeath said sum of $5,000 to his child, or children, him surviving, share and share alike.
“ Third. All the rest, residue and remainder of my estate, of whatever character or description, and including whatever I may hereafter acquire, as well as any legacy herein given which may from any cause lapse, I give, devise and bequeath to my daughter, Sarah J. Mapes.”
The daughter died in 1888, leaving a will by which she made the American Bible Society and the Ladies’ Home Society of Orange county residuary legatees. In 1889 the son died intestate and without children.
W. D. Mills and Lewis F Carr, for app’lts; B. B. Champion, for ex’rs, resp’ts; John F. Bradner, for resp’t Ladies’ Home Society; Bangs, Stetson, Tracy & Me Veagh, for resp’t American Bible Society.

Opinion:
Barnard, P. J.
The testator intended to dispose of all his property. He made certain specific legacies and bequests and then made a very comprehensive residuary disposition of all the residue of his property to his daughter, Sarah Mapes. There was a bequest of a life estate in $4,000 to his son, with remainder to the children of this son who survived him. It is this clause which occasions the question to be adjudged. The son died after his sister and left no children. Did the testator keep back a possible estate to revert to him in case the son died childless? It seems very clear that he did not. He provided for the life estate and for the remainder, and if there was anything beyond that, he bequeathed it by the residuary clause. The intention to include in the residuary clause all the testator's property and interests is preserved, and the intention to exclude from its operation must appear by words limiting the effect of the clause, or by an intention to exclude from the whole will taken together. Riker v. Cornwell, 113 N. Y., 115; 22 N. Y. State Rep., 151; Floyd v. Carow, 88 N. Y., 560.
The judgment should, therefore, be affirmed, with costs to respondent out of the estate.
Dykman, J., concurs; Cullen, J., dissents.