Case Name: Thomas G. WOLFIN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2017-03-07
Citations: 512 S.W.3d 107
Docket Number: No. ED 103945
Parties: Thomas G. WOLFIN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 512
Pages: 107–107

Head Matter:
Thomas G. WOLFIN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 103945
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
FILED: March 7, 2017
Srikant Chigurupati, Public Defenders Office, St. Louis, MO, Attorney for Appellant.
Josh Hawley, Attorney General, Robert Bartholomew, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorney for Respondent.
Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Thomas G. Wolfín ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's "Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Judgment Denying his Pro Se Motion and Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence" ("Judgment"), alleging ineffective assistance of counsel, without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential 9or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).