Case Name: Louis Gerard GOERES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC.; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-02-14
Citations: 220 F. App'x 663
Docket Number: No. 05-15282
Parties: Louis Gerard GOERES, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC.; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before: REINHARDT, RYMER, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 220
Pages: 663–663

Head Matter:
Louis Gerard GOERES, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC.; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
No. 05-15282.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Feb. 12, 2007.
Filed Feb. 14, 2007.
Teresa S. Renaker, Esq., Lewis Feinberg Renaker & Jackson, PC, Oakland, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Kim Zeldin, Esq., Liner Yankelevitz Sunshine & Regenstreif, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: REINHARDT, RYMER, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its order granting the motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). The Supreme Court's recent decision in Sereboff v. Mid Atlantic Med. Servs., Inc., — U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 1869, 1875, 164 L.Ed.2d 612 (2006), does not undermine the district court's reasoning and Peralta v. Hispanic Business, Inc., 419 F.3d 1064, 1076 (9th Cir.2005), supports it.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.