Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark E. PHILLIPS, a/k/a Mark L. Aaron, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-02-23
Citations: 420 F. App'x 269
Docket Number: No. 10-7527
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark E. PHILLIPS, a/k/a Mark L. Aaron, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 420
Pages: 269–269

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark E. PHILLIPS, a/k/a Mark L. Aaron, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-7527.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 10, 2011.
Decided: Feb. 23, 2011.
Mark E. Phillips, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Charles Kay, Allen F. Loucks, Paul M. Tiao, Assistant United States Attorneys, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Mark E. Phillips seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion to recuse and denying his motion for assignment of the chief judge or another district court judge to adjudicate recusal. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Phillips seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.