Case Name: In the Matter of the Claim of George Yeannelis, Respondent, against Michael Menides, Doing Business under the Name of Excellent Painting and Decorating Company, Respondent, and Samuel Diamond et al., Appellants. The State Industrial Board, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1932-03-29
Citations: 259 N.Y. 513
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Claim of George Yeannelis, Respondent, against Michael Menides, Doing Business under the Name of Excellent Painting and Decorating Company, Respondent, and Samuel Diamond et al., Appellants. The State Industrial Board, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 259
Pages: 513–513

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Claim of George Yeannelis, Respondent, against Michael Menides, Doing Business under the Name of Excellent Painting and Decorating Company, Respondent, and Samuel Diamond et al., Appellants. The State Industrial Board, Respondent.
(Argued March 15, 1932;
decided March 29, 1932.)
T. Carlyle Jones and Bernard J. Vincent for appellants.
John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General (Joseph A. McLaughlin, Roy Wiedersum and John R. O’Hanlon of counsel), for respondents.

Opinion:
Appeal dismissed, with costs, the record not indicating that any constitutional question was raised below (Purdy v. Erie R. R. Co., 162 N. Y. 42, 50; Nod-Away Co. v. Carroll, 240 N. Y. 252); no opinion.
Concur: Pound, Ch. J., Crane, Lehman, O'Brien and Hubbs, JJ. Not sitting: Kellogg, J.