Case Name: Victor R. MOORE, Sr., Appellant, v. M.B.R. MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2014-10-14
Citations: 445 S.W.3d 681
Docket Number: No. ED 101017
Parties: Victor R. MOORE, Sr., Appellant, v. M.B.R. MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, Respondent.
Judges: Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 445
Pages: 681–681

Head Matter:
Victor R. MOORE, Sr., Appellant, v. M.B.R. MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, Respondent.
No. ED 101017.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Oct. 14, 2014.
Melvin L. Raymond, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
David L. Sehenberg, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Victor R. Moore, Sr. ("Appellant") appeals from a judgment of the circuit court granting M.B.R. Management Corporation's ("MBR's") motion to dismiss with prejudice Appellant's action, which was time-barred, under the Missouri Human Rights Act ("MHRA"), Section 213.010 et seq., RSMo (2000). Appellant claims the trial court erred because grounds exist to equitably toll the statute of limitations.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).