Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Manuel LOPEZ-ARCEO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-04-20
Citations: 228 F. App'x 783
Docket Number: No. 06-30139
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Manuel LOPEZ-ARCEO, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 228
Pages: 783–784

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Manuel LOPEZ-ARCEO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-30139.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 16, 2007.
Filed April 20, 2007.
Pamela Jackson Byerly, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Spokane, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Tracy Staab, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Spokane, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Manuel Lopez-Arceo appeals from his sentence imposed following his guilty plea to illegal reentry of a deported alien in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we vacate and remand.
Lopez-Arceo contends that the district court improperly imposed an eight-level increase in his offense level under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(C) based on his prior convictions. In light of the Supreme Court's recent decision in Lopez v. Gonzales, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 625, 633, 166 L.Ed.2d 462 (2006), the parties have filed a joint motion requesting that we remand the case for re-sentencing. We grant that motion, vacate the sentence, and remand for re-sentencing.
The mandate shall issue forthwith.
VACATED and REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.