Case Name: Edwin L. DIRCK, et al., Respondents, v. STATE of Missouri, et al., Appellants, and Mel Hancock, et al., Intervenors
Court: Supreme Court of Missouri
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1984-02-02
Citations: 665 S.W.2d 615
Docket Number: No. 65085
Parties: Edwin L. DIRCK, et al., Respondents, v. STATE of Missouri, et al., Appellants, and Mel Hancock, et al., Intervenors.
Judges: All concur except RENDLEN, C.J., who dissents with Dissenting Opinion to follow.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 665
Pages: 615–618

Head Matter:
Edwin L. DIRCK, et al., Respondents, v. STATE of Missouri, et al., Appellants, and Mel Hancock, et al., Intervenors.
No. 65085.
Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc.
Feb. 2, 1984.
Dissenting Opinion March 2, 1984.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The Court having considered the briefs . and arguments of the parties finds there is no justiciable controversy between the parties, ripe for adjudication. It is therefore ordered that the judgment of the trial court be and hereby is vacated and cause dismissed. See Buechner v. Bond, 650 S.W.2d 611 (Mo. banc 1983); Goode v. Bond, 652 S.W.2d 98 (Mo. banc 1988).
All concur except RENDLEN, C.J., who dissents with Dissenting Opinion to follow.