Case Name: Josue Israel Soto DE LEON, Petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-06-08
Citations: 605 F. App'x 212
Docket Number: No. 14-2234
Parties: Josue Israel Soto DE LEON, Petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. '
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 605
Pages: 212–212

Head Matter:
Josue Israel Soto DE LEON, Petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 14-2234.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 15, 2015.
Decided: June 8, 2015.
Hugo Cesar Castro, Rockville, Maryland, for Petitioner. Benjamin C. Mizer, Assistant Attorney General, Francis W. Fraser, Senior Litigation Counsel, Regina Byrd, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Before WILKINSON and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. '

Opinion:
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Josué Israel Soto De Leon, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("Board") denying his motion to reconsider. We review the Board's decision denying De Leon's motion to reconsider for abuse of discretion, Jean v. Gonzales, 435 F.3d 475, 481 (4th Cir.2006), and may only reverse if the Board '"acted arbitrarily, irrationally, or contrary to law,' " Narine v. Holder, 559 F.3d 246, 249 (4th Cir.2009) (quoting Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791 (9th Cir.2005)). We have reviewed the administrative record and the Board's order and find no such abuse of discretion. We therefore deny the petition for review. See In re: Soto De Leon (B.I.A. Oct. 15, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.