Case Name: Carlos M. GUIDA, Appellant, v. Maria Eugenia GUIDA, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-05-01
Citations: 816 So. 2d 717
Docket Number: No. 3D00-2594
Parties: Carlos M. GUIDA, Appellant, v. Maria Eugenia GUIDA, Appellee.
Judges: Before LEVY, GERSTEN, and GODERICH, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 816
Pages: 717–718

Head Matter:
Carlos M. GUIDA, Appellant, v. Maria Eugenia GUIDA, Appellee.
No. 3D00-2594.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 1, 2002.
Rehearing Denied June 5, 2002.
Cynthia L. Greene; Emilio C. Caballero, for appellant.
Abrams, Etter & Marks and Deborah Marks, for appellee.
Before LEVY, GERSTEN, and GODERICH, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In view of the fact that none of the amounts of the awards made to the wife in this case, specifically including, but not limited to, lump sum alimony, permanent periodic alimony, and equitable distribution, are not supported by substantial competent evidence in the Record, the Final Judgment entered in this case is reversed in its entirety and the case is remanded for a new trial on all issues with the sole exception of the appellee's attempt to seek punitive damages, which said attempted claim shall be stricken by the trial court upon remand.
Reversed and remanded.
. Appellee, on the day of trial, moved to amend her pleadings, by interlineation, to include a claim for punitive damages. The trial court reserved ruling on the said motion and never granted it.