Case Name: Chastain et al. v. Lindley
Court: Appellate Court of Indiana
Jurisdiction: Indiana
Decision Date: 1920-06-17
Citations: 73 Ind. App. 448
Docket Number: No. 10,831
Parties: Chastain et al. v. Lindley.
Judges: 
Reporter: Indiana Court of Appeals Reports
Volume: 73
Pages: 448–449

Head Matter:
Chastain et al. v. Lindley.
[No. 10,831.
Filed June 17, 1920.]
Appeal. — Review.—Decision.—Conclusiveness.—Where the evidence tends to sustain the decision of the trial court, it will not be disturbed on appeal for insufficiency of evidence.
From Orange Circuit Court; Oscar Ratts, Special Judge.
Action by Mark B. Chastain and others against Arthur L. Lindley. Prom a judgment for defendant, the plaintiffs appeal.
Affirmed.
Samuel R. Lambdin and William H. Talbott, for appellants.
William J. Throop, McCart & McCart and L. C. Wright, for appellee.

Opinion:
Dausman, J.
Appellants instituted this action to review a judgment for errors of law appearing in the proceedings. §645, 646 Burns 1914, §614, 615 R. S. 1881. The cause was tried on a transcript of the record made in the original action. The court made a general finding for the appellee and rendered judgment that appellants take nothing by their action. The only alleged error presented here is that the court erred in holding that there is evidence to sustain the decision in the original action. We have examined that evidence and we find that it tends fairly to sustain the decision.
Judgment affirmed.