Case Name: The State v. Marshall, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Missouri
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1894-05-08
Citations: 121 Mo. 476
Docket Number: 
Parties: The State v. Marshall, Appellant.
Judges: All of this division concur.
Reporter: Missouri Reports
Volume: 121
Pages: 476–477

Head Matter:
The State v. Marshall, Appellant.
Division Two,
May 8, 1894.
Criminal Law: seduction: indictment. An indictment for seduotion under promise of marriage which alleges a promise, hut fails to eharge that defendant seduced the prosecutrix is fatally defective.
Appeal from Chariton Circuit Court. — How. ~W. ~W. Rucker, Judge.
Reversed AND remanded.
Luther N. Dempsey and Crawley & Son for appellant.
The indictment in this case charges no crime. It alleges a promise of marriage made by appellant “to one Annie Mason,” but fails to allege who it was he seduced! The judgment should be reversed.
JR. F. Walker, Attorney G-eneral, and Morton Jour dan, Assistant Attorney General, for the state.
The indictment in this case follows the language of the statute creating the offense, clearly charges the crime of which defendant has been convicted, and gave notice to him of the accusation he was required to meet. R. S. 1889, sec. 3486.

Opinion:
Gantt, P. J.
The defendant, Isaac Marshall, was indicted, tried and convicted, at the October term, 1893, of the Chariton circuit court, for the seduction, under promise of marriage, of Annie Mason.
The indictment is in these words: "The grand jurors for the state of Missouri chosen, selected and summoned from the body of the county of Chariton in the state of Missouri, and impaneled, sworn and charged to inquire within and for the body of said county of Chariton, upon their oath do present and charge that one Isaac Marshall on or about the-day of August, 1892, at the county of Chariton in the state of Missouri, then and there unlawfully and feloniously under and by virtue of a promise then and there made by him, the said Isaac Marshall, to one Annie Mason, an unmarried female of good repute under eighteen years of age, to wit, of the age of seventeen years, did then and there unlawfully and feloni-ously seduce and debauch, against, the peace and dignity of the state."
The defendant challenged the sufficiency of the indictment in the circuit court by a motion in arrest, which was overruled. He renews his objections here.
The indictment alleges a promise of marriage by defendant to Annie Mason but it nowhere charges that he seduced her or any other female, and is for that reason fatally defective. The judgment is reversed and cause remanded.
All of this division concur.