Case Name: In the Matter of A. L., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. A. L., Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2008-05-14
Citations: 220 Or. App. 127
Docket Number: 070363210; A135542
Parties: In the Matter of A. L., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. A. L., Appellant.
Judges: Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Schuman, Judge, and Ortega, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 220
Pages: 127–128

Head Matter:
Submitted March 7,
reversed May 14, 2008
In the Matter of A. L., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. A. L., Appellant.
Multnomah County Circuit Court
070363210; A135542
184 P3d 1224
Liza Langford filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Michael R. Washington, Senior Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Schuman, Judge, and Ortega, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
The trial court found that appellant has a mental disorder and, because of that mental disorder, is a danger to herself. The court entered an order of involuntary commitment on that basis. Appellant argues on appeal that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence that she is a danger to herself. The state concedes the point and agrees that the order of involuntary commitment should be reversed. On de novo review, we agree that the evidence is insufficient to support the commitment.
Reversed.