Case Name: Carl R. Ricci, Doing Business as C.R. Ricci Athletic Sales, Appellant, v. New Era Cap Co., Inc., Respondent, et al., Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1996-02-02
Citations: 224 A.D.2d 963
Docket Number: 
Parties: Carl R. Ricci, Doing Business as C.R. Ricci Athletic Sales, Appellant, v New Era Cap Co., Inc., Respondent, et al., Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 224
Pages: 963–964

Head Matter:
Carl R. Ricci, Doing Business as C.R. Ricci Athletic Sales, Appellant, v New Era Cap Co., Inc., Respondent, et al., Defendant.
[638 NYS2d 373]

Opinion:
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court (Harvey, J.). We add only that plaintiffs motion to amend the complaint to add causes of action for fraud and constructive fraud was properly denied. The proposed amendment manifestly lacked merit and was " 'palpably insufficient on [its] face' " (Washburn v Citibank [S. D.], 190 AD2d 1057; see, Metral v Horn, 213 AD2d 524, 525). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Ontario County, Harvey, J.— Amend Complaint.) Present — Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wesley, Davis and Boehm, JJ.