Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Pedro Flores MONDRAGON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-08-20
Citations: 539 F. App'x 393
Docket Number: No. 13-50021
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Pedro Flores MONDRAGON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 539
Pages: 393–393

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Pedro Flores MONDRAGON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-50021
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 20, 2013.
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Carla J. Cox, Esq., Jackson Walker, L.L.P., Austin, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Pedro Flores Mondragon, Big Spring, TX, pro se.
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Pedro Flores Mondragon (Flores) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Flores has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Flores's response. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no non-frivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th CiR. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.