Case Name: Joseph P. FEAGAN; Lillie B. White; Nellie M. Richards, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. JAUNT, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-09-13
Citations: 241 F. App'x 959
Docket Number: No. 06-2094
Parties: Joseph P. FEAGAN; Lillie B. White; Nellie M. Richards, Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. JAUNT, INCORPORATED, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 241
Pages: 959–959

Head Matter:
Joseph P. FEAGAN; Lillie B. White; Nellie M. Richards, Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. JAUNT, INCORPORATED, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 06-2094.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 31, 2007.
Decided: Sept. 13, 2007.
Robert P. Dwoskin, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellants. Rosalie P. Fessier, Timberlake, Smith, Thomas & Moses, P.C., Staunton, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Joseph P. Feagan, Lillie B. White, and Nellie M. Richards appeal the district court's order dismissing them action under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101-12213 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Feagan v. Jaunt, Inc., No. 3:05-cv-00066, 2006 WL 2796778 (W.D.Va. Sept. 27, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.