Case Name: BRADY, Appellant, v. STATE ACCIDENT INSURANCE FUND, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1977-10-24
Citations: 31 Or. App. 363
Docket Number: No. 77-309, CA 8697
Parties: BRADY, Appellant, v. STATE ACCIDENT INSURANCE FUND, Respondent.
Judges: Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Richardson and Joseph, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 31
Pages: [363]–[365]

Head Matter:
Argued September 23,
affirmed October 24, 1977
BRADY, Appellant, v. STATE ACCIDENT INSURANCE FUND, Respondent.
(No. 77-309, CA 8697)
570 P2d 115
Gary D. Rossi, Coos Bay, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Stevenson, Rossi, Lesan & Johansen, Coos Bay.
Earl M. Preston, Associate Counsel, State Accident Insurance Fund, Legal Division, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were K. R. Maloney, Chief Counsel, and James A. Blevins, Chief Trial Counsel, State Accident Insurance Fund, Legal Division, Salem.
Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Richardson and Joseph, Judges.
PER CURIAM.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this worker's compensation case the Evaluation Division of the Workers' Compensation Board awarded claimant a total of 86% degrees. On appeal the referee awarded claimant an additional 128 degrees. Claimant and the State Accident Insurance Fund appealed to the Board which affirmed the referee's order. Both parties then appealed to the circuit court. The circuit court affirmed. Claimant here contends that he is permanently and totally disabled; the Fund contends that the award should be reduced to the amount originally granted by the Evaluation Division.
The medical evidence does not support claimant's contention. The Fund's contention presents a closer question, but viewing the evidence as a whole we are satisfied that the order of the referee, as affirmed by both the Board and the circuit court, should stand.
Affirmed.