Case Name: In re Maryrose O. NWADIKE, Respondent
Court: District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Decision Date: 2011-03-31
Citations: 15 A.3d 1261
Docket Number: No. 10-BG-1157
Parties: In re Maryrose O. NWADIKE, Respondent.
Judges: Before REID, Associate Judge, TERRY and KING, Senior Judges.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 15
Pages: 1261–1261

Head Matter:
In re Maryrose O. NWADIKE, Respondent.
No. 10-BG-1157.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Filed March 31, 2011.
Before REID, Associate Judge, TERRY and KING, Senior Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
On further consideration of the certified order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland disbarring respondent from the practice of law, see Attorney Grievance Com'n of Maryland v. Nwadike, 416 Md. 180, 6 A.3d 287 (2010), this court's September 29, 2010, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court, respondent's notice to the court wherein she states that the Court of Appeals of Maryland denied her motion to reconsider, the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is
ORDERED that Maryrose O. Nwadike, Esquire is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. See In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007) and In re Willingham, 900 A.2d 165 (D.C.2006) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate, including those involving disbarment). It is
FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent's suspension will not begin to run until such time as she files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C.Bar. R. XI, § 14(g).