Case Name: Emma W. Noll et al., complainants-appellants, v. Rosedale Cemetery Association, respondent
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1920-03-01
Citations: 91 N.J. Eq. 330
Docket Number: 
Parties: Emma W. Noll et al., complainants-appellants, v. Rosedale Cemetery Association, respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 91
Pages: 330–331

Head Matter:
Emma W. Noll et al., complainants-appellants, v. Rosedale Cemetery Association, respondent.
[Submitted December 8th, 1919.
Decided March 1st, 1920.]
On appeal from the court of chancery.
Messrs. Vail & McLean, for the appellants.
Mr. Ciarle McK. Whiltemore, for the respondent.
Mr. Abram II. Cornish, for the receiver..

Opinion:
Pee Curiam.
The present ease is precisely similar in its determining features to Bliss v. Rosedale Cemetery Association, No. 20 of the present term. Por tire reasons stated in the per curiam filed in that case, the decree herein will be affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Swayze, Trbnoiiard;, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kausoh, Black, White,. Heepeniteimer, Williams, Taylor. Gardner, Ackerson — 14.
For reversal — None.