Case Name: THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. Richard D. HAMRICK, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1985-11-14
Citations: 478 So. 2d 814
Docket Number: No. 65879
Parties: THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. Richard D. HAMRICK, Respondent.
Judges: ADKINS, Acting C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 478
Pages: 814–815

Head Matter:
THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. Richard D. HAMRICK, Respondent.
No. 65879.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Nov. 14, 1985.
John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director and John T. Berry, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, and David R. Ristoff, Bar Counsel, Tampa, for complainant.
Richard D. Hamrick, in pro. per., Tampa.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The Florida Bar charged Hamrick, a member of the bar, with violating discipli nary rules 6-101(A)(3) (neglect of a legal matter) and 7-101(A)(l) (failure to seek the legal objectives of a client). Following a hearing on the matter, the referee recommended that Hamrick be found guilty of the above-listed charges and that he be given a public reprimand.
After reviewing the record, we agree with the referee's recommendations. We therefore find Richard D. Hamrick guilty of violating disciplinary rules 6-101(A)(3) and 7-101(A)(l). Publication of this opinion in the Southern Reporter will serve as his public reprimand. Judgment for costs in the amount of $916.33 is hereby entered against Hamrick, for which sum let execution issue.
It is so ordered.
ADKINS, Acting C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur.