Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Wilbor Emin Meza DUQUE, also known as Wilber Meza, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-12-17
Citations: 548 F. App'x 1023
Docket Number: No. 13-40282
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Wilbor Emin Meza DUQUE, also known as Wilber Meza, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before DAVIS, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 548
Pages: 1023–1023

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Wilbor Emin Meza DUQUE, also known as Wilber Meza, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-40282
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 17, 2013.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Laura Fletcher Leavitt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Molly Estelle Odom, Esq., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before DAVIS, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Wilbor Emin Meza Duque has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Meza Duque has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Meza Duque's response. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.