Case Name: Antonio BAKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1997-03-19
Citations: 696 So. 2d 830
Docket Number: No. 95-04318
Parties: Antonio BAKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: PATTERSON, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and FULMER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 696
Pages: 830–831

Head Matter:
Antonio BAKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 95-04318.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
March 19, 1997.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Douglas Chanco, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General Tallahassee, and Wendy Buffington, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Antonio Baker appeals his convictions and terms of probation imposed for sale of cocaine and possession of cocaine with intent to sell. We strike the part of condition three of the probation order that prohibits Baker from carrying "destructive devices." See Holmes v. State, 675 So.2d 995 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). We also strike the $100 cost imposed for an FDLE lab fee. Although the state requested this cost at the sentencing hearing, it offered no documentation to support the fee, and the trial court did not find that Mr. Baker had the ability to pay. See Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111, 118-19 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). We affirm Mr. Baker's convictions and sanctions in all other respects.
Affirmed as modified.
PATTERSON, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and FULMER, JJ., concur.