Case Name: Travis L. SMALL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ray ANDREWS, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-06-16
Citations: 67 F. App'x 461
Docket Number: No. 01-17117; D.C. No. CV-99-06685-AWI
Parties: Travis L. SMALL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ray ANDREWS, Warden, RespondentAppellee.
Judges: Before RYMER, THOMAS and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 67
Pages: 461–462

Head Matter:
Travis L. SMALL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ray ANDREWS, Warden, RespondentAppellee.
No. 01-17117.
D.C. No. CV-99-06685-AWI.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 9, 2003.
Decided June 16, 2003.
Before RYMER, THOMAS and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Former federal prisoner Travis L. Small appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for habeas corpus. We lack jurisdiction, and dismiss.
Small contends that he should have received, as ordered by the federal sentencing court, concurrent state and federal sentences and credit for the year spent in federal detention pursuant to a writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum. Whatever the merits of this contention, we cannot grant the relief Small requests, because he has already completed the sentence whose execution he challenges. See Fendler v. United States Bureau of Prisons, 846 F.2d 550, 555 (9th Cir.1988); see also United States v. Johnson, 529 U.S. 53, 60, 120 S.Ct. 1114, 146 L.Ed.2d 39 (2000) (holding that excess time in prison is not to be subtracted from term of supervised release, but 18 U.S.C. § 3583 may be invoked to seek modification of conditions of supervised release or early termination of supervision if considerations of equity warrant). The appeal must be dismissed as moot. See Aaron v. Pepperas, 790 F.2d 1360, 1361-62 (9th Cir.1986) (order).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.