Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Corey HARRELL, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-08-22
Citations: 487 F. App'x 547
Docket Number: No. 12-11271
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Corey HARRELL, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before HULL, FAY and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 487
Pages: 547–547

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Corey HARRELL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-11271
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Aug. 22, 2012.
Stephen Carlton, U.S. Attorney’s Office, West Palm Beach, FL, Wifredo A. Ferrer, Richard Earl Getehell, Jr., Kathleen Mary Salyer, Anne Ruth Schultz, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Ap-pellee.
Robert E. Adler, Federal Public Defender’s Office, West Palm Beach, FL, Michael Caruso, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Miami, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Corey Harrell, Miami, FL, pro se.
Before HULL, FAY and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Robert E. Adler, appointed counsel for Corey Harrell in this criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's denial of Harrell's § 3582(c)(2) motion per Amendment 750 is AFFIRMED.