Case Name: Harvey H. Pfenning et al., Plaintiffs, v. Agri-Business Brokerage Corp. et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents, et al., Defendants. William Perry et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1989-07-12
Citations: 152 A.D.2d 921
Docket Number: 
Parties: Harvey H. Pfenning et al., Plaintiffs, v Agri-Business Brokerage Corp. et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents, et al., Defendants. William Perry et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 152
Pages: 921–922

Head Matter:
Harvey H. Pfenning et al., Plaintiffs, v Agri-Business Brokerage Corp. et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents, et al., Defendants. William Perry et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellants.

Opinion:
Order affirmed with costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Rath, J.
All concur, except Lawton, J., who dissents and votes to reverse, in the following memorandum.