Case Name: WALTON v. WILKINS
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1933-04-21
Citations: 16 Ohio Law Abs. 318
Docket Number: No 2233
Parties: WALTON v WILKINS
Judges: HORNBECK, PJ, KUNKLE and BARNES, JJ.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 16
Pages: 318–319

Head Matter:
WALTON v WILKINS
Ohio Appeals, 2nd Dist, Franklin Co
No 2233.
Decided April 21, 1933
N. L. Greenlee, Columbus, for plaintiff in error.
W. E. Bigony, Columbus, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
OPINION
By THE COURT
Submitted, on application of defendant in error for rehearing.
We have examined the case to which our attention has been directed, namely, Jus tina Gardner v Hengenold, 6 O.D. (Reprint), 997. We do not And that the la\v of this case, so far as it was required to be enunciated by the facts, is in conflict with our decision. We do not believe that the doctrine of merger has such application to the facts in this case as to prevent Walton from asserting his defense against Wilkins.
The application for rehearing will therefore be overruled.
HORNBECK, PJ, KUNKLE and BARNES, JJ.