Case Name: Taylane HUDSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-04-30
Citations: 616 So. 2d 1229
Docket Number: No. 92-01515
Parties: Taylane HUDSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: HALL, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 616
Pages: 1229–1230

Head Matter:
Taylane HUDSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 92-01515.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
April 30, 1993.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Cecilia A. Traína, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Dell H. Edwards, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the appellant's judgments and sentences. We strike special conditions 6, 10, 11 and 13 from the written order of community control and special condition 6 from the written order of probation because these conditions were neither pronounced at sentencing nor statutorily authorized. Vinyard v. State, 586 So.2d 1301 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).
HALL, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.