Case Name: Curtis Nathaniel AUSTIN v. STATE of Arkansas
Court: Arkansas Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Arkansas
Decision Date: 1992-04-06
Citations: 309 Ark. 145
Docket Number: CR 92-349
Parties: Curtis Nathaniel AUSTIN v. STATE of Arkansas
Judges: 
Reporter: Arkansas Reports
Volume: 309
Pages: 145–145

Head Matter:
Curtis Nathaniel AUSTIN v. STATE of Arkansas
CR 92-349
825 S.W.2d 608
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Opinion delivered April 6, 1992
Bill E. Ross, for appellant.
No response.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Appellant, Curtis Nathaniel Austin, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk.
His attorney, Bill E. Ross, admits that the failure to file the record in time was due to a mistake on his part.
We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to.the Committee on Professional Conduct.