Case Name: Nicholas TARANTINO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1975-04-15
Citations: 311 So. 2d 789
Docket Number: No. 74-747
Parties: Nicholas TARANTINO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before PEARSON, HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 311
Pages: 789–790

Head Matter:
Nicholas TARANTINO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 74-747.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 15, 1975.
Rehearing Denied May 13, 1975.
Arthur Joel Berger, Miami, for appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Alan J. Kluger, Legal Intern, for appellee.
Before PEARSON, HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant was found guilty, by a jury of breaking and entering a dwelling with intent to commit a felony to wit: robbery.
The trial court entered a judgment of conviction in accordance with the jury verdict and sentenced the appellant to a term of twelve years in the State Penitentiary.
Appellant urges reversal on the grounds that the evidence against him was, insufficient to prove that he had the requisite intent to commit robbery and that he was denied his right to confront a witness against him as guaranteed to him by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution or by Article One, Section Sixteen of the Florida Constitution.
All of the grounds, relied upon by the appellant for reversal have been considered in the light of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel, and we find that no reversible error has been shown. The record discloses that the case was fairly tried, that the judgment and sentence are supported by the evidence and the law. The rulings of the trial court, challenged by appellant did not, on the record and under the law, constitute harmful error.
Affirmed.