Case Name: Arline Bronzaft, Respondent, v. Louis Goldman et al., Defendants, and Trimuse Corp., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1972-01-20
Citations: 38 A.D.2d 693
Docket Number: 
Parties: Arline Bronzaft, Respondent, v. Louis Goldman et al., Defendants, and Trimuse Corp., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 38
Pages: 693–694

Head Matter:
(January 20, 1972)
Arline Bronzaft, Respondent, v. Louis Goldman et al., Defendants, and Trimuse Corp., Appellant.

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered June 2, 1971, denying motion of the defendant-appellant for summary judgment, dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, but without prejudice to a renewal of the motion for summary judgment, if defendant-appellant is so advised, after completion of pretrial disclosure proceedings. Respondent shall recover of appellant $50 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Concur — Stevens, P. J., McGivern, Kupferman, Murphy and Capozzoli, JJ.