Case Name: James C. MANN, as the Personal Representative of the Estate Of Linda Ruth Mann, Deceased, and James C. Mann, Guardian Ad Litem for Brian Joseph Mann, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, an Agency of the State of Oregon, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1993-08-25
Citations: 122 Or. App. 628
Docket Number: 89-2161; CA A67598
Parties: James C. MANN, as the Personal Representative of the Estate Of Linda Ruth Mann, Deceased, and James C. Mann, Guardian Ad Litem for Brian Joseph Mann, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, an Agency of the State of Oregon, Respondent.
Judges: Before Rossman, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Leeson, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 122
Pages: 628–629

Head Matter:
Submitted on remand from the Oregon Supreme Court May 20,
affirmed August 25, 1993
James C. MANN, as the Personal Representative of the Estate Of Linda Ruth Mann, Deceased, and James C. Mann, Guardian Ad Litem for Brian Joseph Mann, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, an Agency of the State of Oregon, Respondent.
(89-2161; CA A67598)
856 P2d 1055
Robert J. Miller, Sr., Brien F. Hildebrand and Moomaw, Miller & Reel, Beaverton, for appellant.
Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Kaye E. Sunderland, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, for respondent.
Before Rossman, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Leeson, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
This case is before us on remand from the Supreme Court, which reversed our previous decision, 114 Or App 562, 566, 836 P2d 1353 (1992), and directed that we further consider the case in the light of Perez v. Bay Area Hospital, 315 Or 474, 846 P2d 405 (1993). Mann v. Dept. of Transportation, 315 Or 642, 847 P2d 856 (1993).
In Perez, the court held that the notice and limitation periods relevant to a claim that is filed by a minor against a public body, ORS 30.275, are not tolled pending the appointment of a guardian ad litem for the minor. Given that newly-announced rule, we must affirm the trial court's dismissal of plaintiffs second claim, which sought relief for personal injuries sustained by his minor child. We adhere to the remainder of our previous opinion, which affirmed the trial court's dismissal of plaintiffs wrongful death claim.
Affirmed.