Case Name: FEDERATION OF OREGON PAROLE AND PROBATION OFFICERS, Respondent, v. STATE OF OREGON, CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT, Petitioner
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1992-11-25
Citations: 116 Or. App. 572
Docket Number: UP-117-89; CA A69143
Parties: FEDERATION OF OREGON PAROLE AND PROBATION OFFICERS, Respondent, v. STATE OF OREGON, CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT, Petitioner.
Judges: Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Rossman and De Muniz, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 116
Pages: 572–572

Head Matter:
Submitted on petitioner’s motion for reconsideration filed October 14,
reconsideration allowed; opinion (114 Or App 214, 834 P2d 519) vacated; remanded to Employment Relations Board for reconsideration November 25, 1992
FEDERATION OF OREGON PAROLE AND PROBATION OFFICERS, Respondent, v. STATE OF OREGON, CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT, Petitioner.
(UP-117-89; CA A69143)
841 P2d 704
Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Harrison Latto, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, for motion.
Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Rossman and De Muniz, Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Reconsideration allowed; opinion vacated; remanded to Employment Relations Board for reconsideration in the light of Tualatin Valley Bargaining v. Tigard School Dist., 314 Or 274, 840 P2d 657 (1992).