Case Name: The HUMANE SOCIETY OF The UNITED STATES, et al., Appellees v. CAVEL INTERNATIONAL, INC., Appellant Michael Johanns, Secretary, U.S. Department of Agriculture and Barbara J. Masters, Administrator, Food Safety and Inspection Service, Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-03-31
Citations: 275 F. App'x 9
Docket Number: No. 07-5120
Parties: The HUMANE SOCIETY OF The UNITED STATES, et al., Appellees v. CAVEL INTERNATIONAL, INC., Appellant Michael Johanns, Secretary, U.S. Department of Agriculture and Barbara J. Masters, Administrator, Food Safety and Inspection Service, Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 275
Pages: 9–10

Head Matter:
The HUMANE SOCIETY OF The UNITED STATES, et al., Appellees v. CAVEL INTERNATIONAL, INC., Appellant Michael Johanns, Secretary, U.S. Department of Agriculture and Barbara J. Masters, Administrator, Food Safety and Inspection Service, Appellees.
No. 07-5120.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
March 31, 2008.
Before: RANDOLPH, GARLAND, and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
JUDGMENT
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. R. 34(j). It is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the appeal be dismissed as moot.
As this court recently stated in Munsell v. Department of Agriculture, "a case on appeal normally is rendered moot when the appellant closes its business and, as a result, no longer has a cognizable interest in the outcome of the dispute." 509 F.3d 572, 582 (D.C.Cir.2007). Because appellant Cavel International, Inc. is no longer operating its slaughtering facility and has identified no concrete plans to open one elsewhere, its claims are moot. See id. at 583 (noting that where a party has "no clear plans to reopen," mere "speculation that a business could again decide to operate" does not establish a live controversy).
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36(b), this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold the issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after the disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. R. 41(a)(1).