Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Aaron PEREZ-LIZARDI, also known as Lizardi Aron Perezdi, also known as Aaron Montoya Perez, also known as Aaron Lizardo Perez, also known as Aaron Lizardi Perez, also known as Manuel Isarde Landin, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-08-17
Citations: 141 F. App'x 375
Docket Number: No. 04-51347
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Aaron PEREZ-LIZARDI, also known as Lizardi Aron Perezdi, also known as Aaron Montoya Perez, also known as Aaron Lizardo Perez, also known as Aaron Lizardi Perez, also known as Manuel Isarde Landin, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 141
Pages: 375–375

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Aaron PEREZ-LIZARDI, also known as Lizardi Aron Perezdi, also known as Aaron Montoya Perez, also known as Aaron Lizardo Perez, also known as Aaron Lizardi Perez, also known as Manuel Isarde Landin, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 04-51347.
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Decided Aug. 17, 2005.
Joseph H. Gay, Jr, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Philip J. Lynch, Federal Public Defender’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Aaron Perez-Lizardi raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.