Case Name: Patricia Kane v. James D. Parry
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1992-09-17
Citations: 223 Conn. 918
Docket Number: 
Parties: Patricia Kane v. James D. Parry
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 223
Pages: 918–918

Head Matter:
Patricia Kane v. James D. Parry
Patricia Kane, pro se, in support of the petition.
Sperry A. DeCew, in opposition.
Decided September 17, 1992

Opinion:
The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 27 Conn. App. 923, is granted, limited to the following question:
"Where the husband's purported IRS debt of $25,000 was divided equitably at trial, but subsequently revealed to be $191,030.43, is it error for the court to refuse to open the judgment after (a) finding mutual mistake and (b) leaving the wife with substantial debts and the husband with substantial assets?"