Case Name: Marilyn J. BRUNO, f/k/a Marilyn Bruno Miller, Appellant, v. Martin A. MILLER, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-09-26
Citations: 549 So. 2d 234
Docket Number: No. 89-549
Parties: Marilyn J. BRUNO, f/k/a Marilyn Bruno Miller, Appellant, v. Martin A. MILLER, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and LEVY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 549
Pages: 234–234

Head Matter:
Marilyn J. BRUNO, f/k/a Marilyn Bruno Miller, Appellant, v. Martin A. MILLER, Appellee.
No. 89-549.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Sept. 26, 1989.
Marilyn J. Bruno, in pro. per.
Fine, Jacobson, Schwartz, Nash, Block & England, and Arthur J. England, Jr. and Joanne M. Rose, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and LEVY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant was respondent in a dissolution of marriage proceeding. She appeals the final judgment, challenging the trial court's factual findings and claiming error with respect to the amounts awarded. Our review is confined to the record made before the trial court, Tyson v. Aikman, 159 Fla. 273, 31 So.2d 272, 273 (1947), and there is substantial competent evidence which supports the trial court's findings. Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So.2d 13, 16 (Fla.1976). The trial court has great discretion in the fashioning of an equitable decree in matrimonial matters, Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980), and no abuse of that discretion has been shown.
Affirmed.