Case Name: Ramon VARGAS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-02-14
Citations: 541 So. 2d 1238
Docket Number: No. 87-2599
Parties: Ramon VARGAS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and HUBBART, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 541
Pages: 1238–1238

Head Matter:
Ramon VARGAS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 87-2599.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 14, 1989.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Howard K. Blumberg, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Joan L. Greenberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and HUBBART, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
As the state concedes, it was improper for the trial court to impose separate adjudications for possession and sale of the same cocaine. Blanca v. State, 532 So.2d 1327 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). Accordingly, the conviction for possession is vacated and set aside. The sale conviction is affirmed.