Case Name: Francisca Aguilar ROCHA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-01-23
Citations: 506 F. App'x 546
Docket Number: No. 08-73813
Parties: Francisca Aguilar ROCHA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: WALLACE, FARRIS, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 506
Pages: 546–546

Head Matter:
Francisca Aguilar ROCHA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 08-73813.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 18, 2013.
Filed Jan. 23, 2013.
Christopher John Stender, Esquire, Federal Immigration Counselors, Inc., APC, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.
Aimee J. Frederickson, Michael Christopher Heyse, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
Before: WALLACE, FARRIS, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Rocha petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals's denial of her motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b) and we deny the petition.
The Board did not abuse its discretion because it gave a reasoned basis for its decision by stating correctly that Rocha had submitted no evidence showing that she had a well-founded fear of persecution or that she faces a clear probability of torture. See Konstantinova v. I.N.S., 195 F.3d 528, 529 (9th Cir.1999).
PETITION DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.