Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Arthur Barber, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1989-05-09
Citations: 74 N.Y.2d 653
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Arthur Barber, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 74
Pages: 653–660

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Arthur Barber, Appellant.
Argued March 28, 1989;
decided May 9, 1989
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Lynn W. L. Fahey, Philip L. Weinstein and Andrea Hirsch for appellant.
Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney (Susan L. Valle, Stacey K. Edelbaum and Billie Manning of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendant had no right to file a supplemental pro se brief in the Appellate Division and under the circumstances presented we find no abuse of discretion by the court in denying him permission to do so (see, People v White, 73 NY2d 468 [decided herewith]). We have considered defendant's remaining points and find they are either lacking merit, unpreserved or not grounds for reversal.