Case Name: Charles BALL, by Diana MANCINO, Respondent, v. PEAR ONE, INC./Craig REBERS, and Uninsured, Relator, and Special Compensation Fund
Court: Minnesota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Minnesota
Decision Date: 2007-01-24
Citations: 726 N.W.2d 454
Docket Number: No. A06-1980
Parties: Charles BALL, by Diana MANCINO, Respondent, v. PEAR ONE, INC./Craig REBERS, and Uninsured, Relator, and Special Compensation Fund.
Judges: 
Reporter: North Western Reporter 2d
Volume: 726
Pages: 454–454

Head Matter:
Charles BALL, by Diana MANCINO, Respondent, v. PEAR ONE, INC./Craig REBERS, and Uninsured, Relator, and Special Compensation Fund.
No. A06-1980.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
Jan. 24, 2007.
Joseph J. Dudley, Jr., Dudley and Smith, St. Paul, MN, for Relator.
Lorelie M. Hoyer, St. Paul, MN, for Special Compensation Fund.
Todd J. Thun, Bassford Remele, Minneapolis, MN, for Respondents.

Opinion:
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed September 18, 2006, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that, "[sjummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view," doing no more than establishing the law of the case). We further conclude that relator has not overcome the presumption that Minn.Stat. § 176.183 (2004) is constitutional.
Respondent is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.
BY THE COURT:
/s/Lorie S. Gildea Associate Justice