Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Matthew DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-07-01
Citations: 577 F. App'x 200
Docket Number: No. 14-6292
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Matthew DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 577
Pages: 200–201

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Matthew DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 14-6292.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 26, 2014.
Decided: July 1, 2014.
Matthew Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Clifton Thomas Barrett, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Matthew Davis appeals the district court's order granting his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See United States v. Davis, No. 6:95-cr-00284-JAB-1 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 27, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Although the district court granted Davis' § 3582(c)(2) motion, the reduction granted by the court did not reduce Davis' sentence to the full extent he requested.