Case Name: David WILLIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PACIFIC MARITIME ASSOCIATION; International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union, Local # 10; International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union, Defendants-Appellees; Paul Gomez, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Pacific Maritime Association; International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union, Local # 10; International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union, International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union, Local # 34, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1999-07-06
Citations: 179 F.3d 1251
Docket Number: Nos. 97-16778, 97-16779
Parties: David WILLIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PACIFIC MARITIME ASSOCIATION; International Longshoremen’s & Warehousemen’s Union, Local # 10; International Longshoremen’s and Warehousemen’s Union, Defendants-Appellees. Paul Gomez, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Pacific Maritime Association; International Longshoremen’s & Warehousemen’s Union, Local # 10; International Longshoremen’s and Warehousemen’s Union, International Longshoremen’s & Warehousemen’s Union, Local # 34, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: ALARCON, O’SCANNLAIN, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 179
Pages: 1251–1251

Head Matter:
David WILLIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PACIFIC MARITIME ASSOCIATION; International Longshoremen’s & Warehousemen’s Union, Local # 10; International Longshoremen’s and Warehousemen’s Union, Defendants-Appellees. Paul Gomez, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Pacific Maritime Association; International Longshoremen’s & Warehousemen’s Union, Local # 10; International Longshoremen’s and Warehousemen’s Union, International Longshoremen’s & Warehousemen’s Union, Local # 34, Defendants-Appellees.
Nos. 97-16778, 97-16779.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
July 6, 1999.
Before: ALARCON, O’SCANNLAIN, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
Issuance of the mandate in these matters will be deferred until this court has determined whether to grant a petition for rehearing or a petition for a rehearing en banc in Barnett v. U.S. Air, Inc., 157 F.3d 744 (9th Cir.1998). If a petition for a rehearing is granted in that matter, the mandate will not issue in these cases until this court enters its final judgment in Barnett v. U.S. Air, Inc.