Case Name: Lucinda Adams, Respondent, v. Adeline Hazelrigg, Appellant
Court: Washington Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Washington
Decision Date: 1915-06-15
Citations: 86 Wash. 694
Docket Number: No. 12705
Parties: Lucinda Adams, Respondent, v. Adeline Hazelrigg, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Washington Reports
Volume: 86
Pages: 694–694

Head Matter:
[No. 12705.
Department One.
June 15, 1915.]
Lucinda Adams, Respondent, v. Adeline Hazelrigg, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Humphries, J., entered November 27, 1914, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action in tort, tried to the court.
Affirmed.
Longfellow & Fitzpatrick, for appellant.
Frank S. Griffith, for respondent.
Reported in 149 Pac. 324.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This is an action for damages alleged to have been received by the respondent in an assault and battery made upon her by the appellant.
The principal question upon this appeal is which was the aggressor in the affray. There is hopeless conflict in the evidence upon this question. The trial court found that the defendant was the aggressor. We have read the entire record with care, and are not convinced that the trial court was wrong in this conclusion.
The judgment is therefore affirmed.