Case Name: In the Matter of Joseph F. Hammerl, Respondent, v. Alfred C. Maevis, as Commissioner of the Department of Public Works, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1974-03-20
Citations: 34 N.Y.2d 579
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Joseph F. Hammerl, Respondent, v. Alfred C. Maevis, as Commissioner of the Department of Public Works, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 34
Pages: 579–580

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Joseph F. Hammerl, Respondent, v. Alfred C. Maevis, as Commissioner of the Department of Public Works, Appellant.
Argued February 13, 1974;
decided March 20, 1974.
Norman Redlich, Corporation Counsel (Jesse J. Fine and Stanley Buchsbaum of counsel), for appellant.
Julius W. Cohn for respondent.

Opinion:
Order affirmed, with costs to petitioner-respondent, on the Per Curiam opinion at the Appellate Division.
Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Wachtler and Stevens. Judges Jones and Rabin dissent and vote to reverse and reinstate the determination of the Commissioner on the dissenting opinion by Mr. Justice Louis J. Capozzoli at the Appellate Division.