Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward VALENTIN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-06-22
Citations: 653 F. App'x 665
Docket Number: No. 15-15082
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward VALENTIN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILSON, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 653
Pages: 665–666

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward VALENTIN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-15082
Non-Argument Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Date Filed: 06/22/2016
Peter J. Sholl, Arthur Lee Bentley, III, Anita M. Cream, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, Uianys Rivera Miranda, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Orlando, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Rosemary Cakmis, Donna Lee Elm, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Orlando, FL, Edward Valentin, Oakdale, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before WILSON, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Stephen J. Langs, appointed counsel for Edward Valentin in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Valentin's conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.