Case Name: Philip B. Gaynor, Appellant, v. Village of Port Chester, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1919-06
Citations: 188 A.D. 975
Docket Number: 
Parties: Philip B. Gaynor, Appellant, v. Village of Port Chester, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 188
Pages: 975–975

Head Matter:
Philip B. Gaynor, Appellant, v. Village of Port Chester, Respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Rich, Putnam and Jaycox, JJ., concurred; Blackmar, J., dissented upon the ground that the learning of Wakefield v. Brophy (67 Misc. Rep. 298; affd., sub nom. Wakefield v. Gaynor, 144 App. Div. 905; affd., 207 N. Y. 772) does not apply, inasmuch as the express statute has declared the claim is for a village purpose; with whom Jenks, P. J., concurred.
See Laws of 1911, chap. 513.— [Rep. '