Case Name: In the Interest of T.L.T., K.M.T., K.R.T., C.I.T., and C.R.T. K.I.T., Appellant, v. Missouri Division of Family Services, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-09-26
Citations: 26 S.W.3d 620
Docket Number: Nos. ED 77078-ED 77082
Parties: In the Interest of T.L.T., K.M.T., K.R.T., C.I.T., and C.R.T. K.I.T., Appellant, v. Missouri Division of Family Services, Respondent.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., P.J., and MARY RHODES RUSSELL and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 26
Pages: 620–620

Head Matter:
In the Interest of T.L.T., K.M.T., K.R.T., C.I.T., and C.R.T. K.I.T., Appellant, v. Missouri Division of Family Services, Respondent.
Nos. ED 77078-ED 77082.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Sept. 26, 2000.
Edward J. Grewach, Troy, for appellant.
Gary J. Richards, Troy, Thomas B. Burkemper, Guardian Ad Litem, Bruce C. Antrim, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., P.J., and MARY RHODES RUSSELL and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The trial court terminated the parental rights of K.I.T. (Mother) to her five children, T.L.T., K.M.T., K.R.T., C.I.T., and C.R.T. Mother appeals the trial court's judgment and argues the trial court erred when it terminated her rights because (1) there was not clear, cogent, and convincing evidence that the statutory grounds for termination existed; and (2) there was insufficient evidence that the termination of Mother's parental rights was in the best interests of the children. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcript. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).