Case Name: CAMDEN LIME COMPANY, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1958-05-15
Citations: 254 F.2d 814
Docket Number: No. 12444
Parties: CAMDEN LIME COMPANY, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 254
Pages: 814–814

Head Matter:
CAMDEN LIME COMPANY, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.
No. 12444.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued May 6, 1958.
Decided May 15, 1958.
Peter Florey, Philadelphia, Pa. (Robert W. Lees, John F. E. Hippel, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for petitioner.
Margaret M. Farmer, Washington, D. C. (Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Fannie M. Boyls, Atty., N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., on the brief), for respondent.
Before GOODRICH, McLAUGHLIN and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is a petition to review and set aside a decision and order of the National Labor Relations Board. The petitioner's plant, from the operation of which the charges of unfair labor practice developed, is a small one employing but twenty-five men. The employer, desirous of bargaining relations with organized labor, has found itself involved in difficulty because of the number of suitors for favor. The questions involved are wholly factual and we have no ground for setting aside the conclusions reached. We believe, however, that the order should be confined to the issues raised by the complaint.