Case Name: Richard Gene FLORENCE, Appellant, v. WALTON COUNTY, Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-02-25
Citations: 593 So. 2d 1217
Docket Number: No. 91-1468
Parties: Richard Gene FLORENCE, Appellant, v. WALTON COUNTY, Florida, Appellee.
Judges: WIGGINTON, BARFIELD and WOLF, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 593
Pages: 1217–1218

Head Matter:
Richard Gene FLORENCE, Appellant, v. WALTON COUNTY, Florida, Appellee.
No. 91-1468.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Feb. 25, 1992.
Rehearing Denied March 27, 1992.
Bart O. Moore of Moore, Kessler & Moore, Niceville, for appellant.
George Ralph Miller, Defuniak Springs, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The trial court was correct in finding that the amended complaint for mandamus failed to allege sufficient facts which would demonstrate that exhaustion of administrative remedies would be futile. Skaggs-Albertson's Properties v. Michels Belleair Bluff's Pharmacy, Inc., 332 So.2d 113 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1976).
Affirmed.
WIGGINTON, BARFIELD and WOLF, JJ., concur.
. We also note that in cases which involve substantial rights of third parties and factual issues related to those rights (revocation of building permits) that a petition for writ of mandamus may not be an appropriate remedy. See City of Deland v. State, 423 So.2d 529 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).