Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Edward Ellsworth WILSON, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1968-05-02
Citations: 392 F.2d 979
Docket Number: No. 22221
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Edward Ellsworth WILSON, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 392
Pages: 979–979

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Edward Ellsworth WILSON, Appellee.
No. 22221.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
May 2, 1968.
Joseph A. Milchen (argued), Asst. U. S. Atty., Edward L. Miller, Jr., U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for appellant.
John Hart Ely (argued), San Diego, Cal., for appellee.
Before BARNES and ELY, Circuit Judges, and SMITH, District Judge.
Hon. Russell E. Smith, United States District Judge, District of Montana, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
This is an appeal, by the government from an order made by the district court under Rule 41(e) and 57(b), Fed.R.Crim.P., after a hearing which suppressed certain physical evidence, i. e., marijuana. Appellee had been indicted for a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 176a, and had pleaded not guilty. Jurisdiction here rests on 18 U.S.C. § 1404 and 28 U.S.C. § 1294.
An appeal from another portion of the district court order was neither waived nor urged by the government, on oral argument. We consider it moot.
On the authority of Corngold v. United States, 367 F.2d 1 (9th Cir. 1966), the order of suppression is affirmed.