Case Name: Paul WALKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-05-17
Citations: 765 So. 2d 99
Docket Number: No. 1D99-1306
Parties: Paul WALKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ERVIN, BOOTH and BENTON, JJ., CONCUR.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 765
Pages: 99–99

Head Matter:
Paul WALKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D99-1306.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
May 17, 2000.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Glen P. Gifford, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, Attorneys for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Veronica S. McCrackin, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, Attorneys for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant appeals an order revoking his probation. We reverse, because the trial court's order expressly states it is based on charges contained in an amended affidavit filed after Appellant's probationary period ended.
In this case, the amended affidavit raised a charge that appellant violated a condition of probation not raised in the original timely filed affidavit. Based on the record, we are unable to determine whether the trial court would have revoked Appellant's probation based solely on the allegations contained in the original affidavit. Therefore, we reverse the order revoking probation, and remand to the trial court for further proceedings. Dulaney v. State, 735 So.2d 505 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Richardson v. State, 694 So.2d 147 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
ERVIN, BOOTH and BENTON, JJ., CONCUR.