Case Name: S. W. Sibley v. Continental Supply Company
Court: Supreme Court of Texas
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1927-03-09
Citations: 116 Tex. 402
Docket Number: Motion No. 7479
Parties: S. W. Sibley v. Continental Supply Company.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Reports
Volume: 116
Pages: 402–402

Head Matter:
S. W. Sibley v. Continental Supply Company.
Motion No. 7479.
Decided March 9, 1927.
(292 S. W., 155).
R. L. Stennis, for relator,
cited Galbraith v. Bishop, 287 S. W., 1087, as in conflict with the construction of Art. 2007, by the Appellate Court, but did not discuss the effect of the agreement referred to in the opinion.
Fischer & Fischer, for respondent,
called attention to the agreement.

Opinion:
Per Curiam
Opinion on Motion for Rehearing:
The writ of error in this case was properly refused, regardless of the erroneous construction placed by the Court of Civil Appeals on Art. 2007 of the Revised Statutes. Plaintiff in error could not be heard to challenge the right of the court to determine the issue made by a plea of privilege and a controverting affidavit, after entering into an agreement in writing that the court should vacate a certain judgment against him, and thereafter hear and determine the question presented by the plea and the controverting affidavit thereto. Motion for rehearing is therefore overruled.