Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Anastacio ARANDA SOTO, also known as Anastacio Aranda Garcia, also known as Anastacio Aranda-Soto, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-08-18
Citations: 612 F. App'x 788
Docket Number: No. 13-20456
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Anastacio ARANDA SOTO, also known as Anastacio Aranda Garcia, also known as Anastacio Aranda-Soto, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before JOLLY, GRAVES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 612
Pages: 788–788

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Anastacio ARANDA SOTO, also known as Anastacio Aranda Garcia, also known as Anastacio Aranda-Soto, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-20456
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 18, 2015.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Carmen Roe, Esq. Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Anastacio Aranda Soto, Mendota, CA, pro se.
Before JOLLY, GRAVES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Anastacio Aranda Soto has moved for' leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Aranda Soto has not filed a response, has completed the confinement portion of his sentence, and has been removed from the United States. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that Aranda Soto's appeal of his conviction presents no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as frivolous, see 5th Cir. R. 42.2, and in part as moot, see United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis, 483 F.3d 381, 382-83 (5th Cir .2007).
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.