Case Name: STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Douglas Earl DAVIS, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1986-03-14
Citations: 485 So. 2d 24
Docket Number: No. 85-1049
Parties: STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Douglas Earl DAVIS, Appellee.
Judges: GRIMES, A.C.J., and FRANK and HALL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 485
Pages: 24–25

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Douglas Earl DAVIS, Appellee.
No. 85-1049.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
March 14, 1986.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert J. Krauss, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellant.
Jack T. Edmund and Marshall Slaughter, Bartow, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
From our review of the record, which includes the tape recording of the polygraph examinations and the transcript of appellee's confessions which immediately followed, we cannot say that the court erred in suppressing the confessions as the product of an unacceptable level of psychological coercion exerted by the polygraph examiner on the appellee. See Brewer v. State, 386 So.2d 232 (Fla.1980).
Affirmed.
GRIMES, A.C.J., and FRANK and HALL, JJ., concur.