Case Name: IN RE: MIRAPEX PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION Kathryn Gillette; Raif Szczepanski Plaintiffs-Appellants v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Pfizer, Inc.; Pharmacia Corporation; Pharmacia & Upjohn Company LLC Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-04-17
Citations: 683 F. App'x 538
Docket Number: No. 16-3567
Parties: IN RE: MIRAPEX PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION Kathryn Gillette; Raif Szczepanski Plaintiffs-Appellants v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Pfizer, Inc.; Pharmacia Corporation; Pharmacia & Upjohn Company LLC Defendants-Appellees
Judges: Before RILEY, MURPHY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 683
Pages: 538–539

Head Matter:
IN RE: MIRAPEX PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION Kathryn Gillette; Raif Szczepanski Plaintiffs-Appellants v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Pfizer, Inc.; Pharmacia Corporation; Pharmacia & Upjohn Company LLC Defendants-Appellees
No. 16-3567
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: April 12, 2017
Filed: April 17, 2017
Kathryn Gillette, Pro Se
Raif Szczepanski, Pro Se
Lori E. Hammond, Charles M. Pritchett, Jr., Frost & Brown, Louisville, KY, Brandie L. Morgenroth, Tracy Joan Van Steen-burgh, Nilan & Johnson, Minneapolis, MN, Bruce R. Parker, Jason Charles Rose, Venable LLP, Baltimore, MD, Scott A. Smith, Smith Legal PLLC, Minneapolis, MN, for Defendant-Appellee Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
William Hoffman, Kaye & Scholer, Washington, DC, Lori B. Leskin, Arnold & Porter, New York, NY, Joseph Michael Price, Faegre & Baker, Minneapolis, MN, Katherine A. Winchester, Ice & Miller, Indianapolis, IN, for Defendant-Appellee Pfizer, Inc.
William Hoffman, Kaye & Scholer, Washington, DC, Lori B. Leskin, Arnold & Porter, New York, NY, Joseph Michael Price, Faegre & Baker, Minneapolis, MN, for Defendants-Appellees Pharmacia Corporation, Pharmacia & Upjohn Company LLC
Before RILEY, MURPHY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Kathryn Gillette and Raif Szczepanski appeal the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment in their diversity action for damages based on a prescription drug's alleged side effect on Gillette. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties' arguments on appeal, we conclude that summary judgment was properly granted for the reasons stated by the district court. See Beaulieu v. Ludeman, 690 F.3d 1017, 1024 (8th Cir. 2012) (grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo, viewing record in light most favorable to nonmovant); Integrity Floorcovering, Inc. v. Broan-Nutone, LLC, 521 F.3d 914, 917 (8th Cir. 2008) (district court's determina tion of state law is* reviewed de novo). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Michael J. Davis, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable Franklin L. Noel, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota,
. We do not consider allegations or claims that were not mentioned below. See Stone v. Harry, 364 F.3d 912, 914 (8th Cir. 2004) (stating general rule that claims not presented in district court may not be advanced for first time on appeal),