Case Name: Cincinnati Bar Association v. Hartke
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2013-01-09
Citations: 135 Ohio St. 3d 1227
Docket Number: No. 2011-1774
Parties: Cincinnati Bar Association v. Hartke.
Judges: O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 135
Pages: 1227–1227

Head Matter:
Cincinnati Bar Association v. Hartke.
[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Hartke, 135 Ohio St.3d 1227, 2013-Ohio-19.]
(No. 2011-1774
Submitted January 7, 2013
Decided January 9, 2013.)

Opinion:
{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, James R. Hartke, Attorney Registration No. 0011584, last known business address in Cincinnati, Ohio.
{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of June 6, 2012, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of six months, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A).
{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.
{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.
O'Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O'Neill, JJ., concur.