Case Name: Jorge Ignacio PUIG, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-03-15
Citations: 761 So. 2d 354
Docket Number: No. 3D99-1329
Parties: Jorge Ignacio PUIG, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before COPE, GODERICH and SHEVIN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 761
Pages: 354–355

Head Matter:
Jorge Ignacio PUIG, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D99-1329.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 15, 2000.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Lisa Walsh, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before COPE, GODERICH and SHEVIN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Jorge Ignacio Puig appeals his conviction for burglary of a dwelling and grand theft. As to the theft count, we conclude that the evidence was sufficient to establish the value of the stolen items and reject appellant's argument to the contrary. See Pickles v. State, 313 So.2d 715, 717 (Fla.1975).
The appellant's pro se argument that the trial court was biased against him is rejected because no motion for disqualification was filed in the trial court. Assuming arguendo such a motion had been filed, the arguments made by appellant for disqualification are legally insufficient.
Affirmed.