Case Name: Launeil SANDERS; Janneth Sanders, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Henry McMASTER, State of South Carolina Authorized Agent, Chief Law Enforcement Officer, SC Attorney General; Trey Gowdy, State of South Carolina, SC 7th Solicitor; Mark Kitchens; David Ingalls; David Alford; Prepaid Legal, Inc., Its Authorized Representative Counsel Berry, Quackenbush, and Stuart, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-03-16
Citations: 317 F. App'x 358
Docket Number: No. 08-1671
Parties: Launeil SANDERS; Janneth Sanders, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Henry McMASTER, State of South Carolina Authorized Agent, Chief Law Enforcement Officer, SC Attorney General; Trey Gowdy, State of South Carolina, SC 7th Solicitor; Mark Kitchens; David Ingalls; David Alford; Prepaid Legal, Inc., Its Authorized Representative Counsel Berry, Quackenbush, and Stuart, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 317
Pages: 358–359

Head Matter:
Launeil SANDERS; Janneth Sanders, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Henry McMASTER, State of South Carolina Authorized Agent, Chief Law Enforcement Officer, SC Attorney General; Trey Gowdy, State of South Carolina, SC 7th Solicitor; Mark Kitchens; David Ingalls; David Alford; Prepaid Legal, Inc., Its Authorized Representative Counsel Berry, Quackenbush, and Stuart, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 08-1671.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 12, 2009.
Decided: March 16, 2009.
Launeil Sanders, Janneth Sanders, Appellants Pro Se. Mary Frances G. Jowers, South Carolina Attorney General’s Office, Columbia, South Carolina; Edwin Calhoun Haskell, III, Smith & Haskell, Spartan-burg, South Carolina; Christopher R. Ant-ley, Devlin & Parkinson, PA, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees; David Griffith Ingalls, Appellee Pro Se.
Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Launeil Sanders and Janneth Sanders appeal the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting the motions to dismiss filed by Defendants, David Alford, Henry McMaster, and the State of South Carolina. In them informal appellate brief, the Sanders failed to challenge the district court's reasons supporting the denial of relief. Accordingly, the Sanders have for feited appellate review of those issues. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b) ("The Court will limit its review to the issues raised in the informal brief."). Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.