Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Charles Hoover, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1982-10-19
Citations: 57 N.Y.2d 908
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles Hoover, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 57
Pages: 908–909

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles Hoover, Appellant.
Decided October 19, 1982
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
William E. Hellerstein and John D.B. Lewis for appellant.
Mario Merola, District Attorney (Debra S. Reiser of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order reversed and a new trial ordered. The trial court erred in permitting the prosecution to elicit testimony regarding defendant's statements in that the prosecution was duty bound to inform the defense of the existence of those statements, which in effect were used as direct evidence of guilt (People v Ricco, 56 NY2d 320), pursuant to CPL 710.30 (People v Briggs, 38 NY2d 319).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.