Case Name: NAHM TARZY, PLAINTIFF, v. UNITED PIECE DYE WORKS, DEFENDANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1929-05-07
Citations: 7 N.J. Misc. 501
Docket Number: 
Parties: NAHM TARZY, PLAINTIFF, v. UNITED PIECE DYE WORKS, DEFENDANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 7
Pages: 501–501

Head Matter:
NAHM TARZY, PLAINTIFF, v. UNITED PIECE DYE WORKS, DEFENDANT.
Submitted January term, 1929
Decided May 7, 1929.
Before Justices Black, Campbell and Case.
For the rule, John W. Ochford.
Contra, Kellogg & Chance.

Opinion:
Pee Curiam.
In an action for negligence the defendant has a verdict, and under this rule the plaintiff seeks to set it aside for the reasons:
1. It is against the weight of the evidence.
2. It is contrary to the charge of the court.
3. It indicates prejudice and partiality.
There was a fair dispute of facts presented by the proofs and our examination thereof does not bring us to the conclusion that the verdict was the result of mistake, prejudice or passion, and therefore the rule to show cause is discharged, with costs.