Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MATTHEW WAYNE STEWART, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1994-02-23
Citations: 126 Or. App. 456
Docket Number: 10-90-07017C; CA A71065
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MATTHEW WAYNE STEWART, Appellant.
Judges: RIGGS, J.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 126
Pages: 456–458

Head Matter:
On respondent’s motion for reconsideration filed October 20,1993,
reconsideration allowed; opinion (123 Or App 147, 859 P2d 545 (1993)) modified and adhered to as modified February 23,
petition for review allowed July 5, 1994 (319 Or 281)
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MATTHEW WAYNE STEWART, Appellant.
(10-90-07017C; CA A71065)
868 P2d 794
Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Janet A. Metcalf, Assistant Attorney General, for motion.
Jesse Wm. Barton, Deputy Public Defender, contra.
RIGGS, J.

Opinion:
RIGGS, J.
The state seeks reconsideration of our opinion in State v. Stewart, 123 Or App 147, 859 P2d 545 (1993), because the last two paragraphs of the opinion are inconsistent with one another. The state is correct. Defendant's last assignment of error was not preserved. State v. Farmer, 317 Or 220, 224, 856 P2d 623 (1993). Accordingly, we modify the opinion to withdraw the paragraph in which we considered that assignment.
Reconsideration allowed; opinion modified and adhered to as modified.