Case Name: Mary Kathleen JACOBS-CARDENAS-JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF WASHINGTON et al., Defendants
Court: United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-11-14
Citations: 587 F. Supp. 2d 113
Docket Number: Civil Action No. 08 1960
Parties: Mary Kathleen JACOBS-CARDENAS-JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF WASHINGTON et al., Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Supplement 2d
Volume: 587
Pages: 113–114

Head Matter:
Mary Kathleen JACOBS-CARDENAS-JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF WASHINGTON et al., Defendants.
Civil Action No. 08 1960.
United States District Court, District of Columbia.
Nov. 14, 2008.
Mary Kathleen Jacobs-Cardenas-Johnson, Washington, DC, pro se.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMES ROBERTSON, District Judge.
The plaintiff has filed a pro se complaint and an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant the application to proceed in forma pauperis, but will dismiss the complaint as frivolous and delusional.
Plaintiffs complaint states in part that she is seeking to have "my Mom's Prosecutor appt. of the Pentagon because she is deceased." (Compl. at 2.) It further states that "an Egyptian Doctor that was here . was indeed attempting to force me to become his own Blood and Brain research." (Id.) And, "[i]t is my DNA that the Egyptian Doctor wants and has harmed me several times throughout my life because of. My DNA and future Embryo's are to become the United States Aerospace-Aeronautics future Astronauts of the United States of America." (Id. at 3.) The complaint alleges no wrong-doing by any of the named defendants, but rather requests that the City of Washington to keep her safe. She also requests the Court to "produce and schedule for [her], by Law" an appointment for the U.S. Military Pentagon Court. (Id. at 5.)
This complaint presents precisely the sort of "fantastic or delusional scenarios" that warrant dismissal. Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 328, 109 S.Ct. 1827, 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989). Accordingly, this complaint will be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) (requiring dismissal of frivolous complaints).
A separate order accompanies this memorandum opinion.
. The pages of the complaint are unnumbered.