Case Name: Dorisene ANDERSON, Appellant, v. TARGET CORPORATION, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-03-10
Citations: 268 F. App'x 487
Docket Number: No. 06-3797
Parties: Dorisene ANDERSON, Appellant, v. TARGET CORPORATION, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 268
Pages: 487–488

Head Matter:
Dorisene ANDERSON, Appellant, v. TARGET CORPORATION, Appellee.
No. 06-3797.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: March 3, 2008.
Filed: March 10, 2008.
Dorisene Anderson, Woodbury, MN, pro se.
Joseph G. Schmitt, Sandra L. Jezierski, Halleland & Lewis, Minneapolis, MN, for Appellee.
Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
[UNPUBLISHED]
PER CURIAM.
Dorisene Anderson appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment in her employment-discrimination action against her former employer, Target Corporation. Having carefully reviewed the record and considered Anderson's arguments, we find no basis for reversal. See Jacob-Mua v. Veneman, 289 F.3d 517, 520 (8th Cir.2002) (de novo standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.