Case Name: FRANK LEWIS VIAN v. STATE
Court: Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1913-01-13
Citations: 8 Okla. Crim. 588
Docket Number: No. A-1863
Parties: FRANK LEWIS VIAN v. STATE.
Judges: ARMSTRONG and DOYEE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Oklahoma Criminal Reports
Volume: 8
Pages: 588–590

Head Matter:
FRANK LEWIS VIAN v. STATE.
No. A-1863.
Opinion Filed January 13, 1913.
Opinion on Rehearing February 1, 1913.
(128 Pac. 1103; 129 Pac. 450.)
1. APPEAL AND ERROR — Record—Case-Made. Where a defendant desires to take an appeal, he must prepare and serve his case-made within 30 days from the date of sentence, unless such time is extended by order of the trial court. If this is not done, the case-made will be stricken from the record.
2. SAME — Time of Taking Proceedings — Notice.. Where a defendant takes an appeal, he must serve a written notice of appeal upon the county attorney and the clerk of the court in which the case was tried within the time required by law. If this is not done, the appeal will be dismissed.
3. APPEAL — Rehearing. When counsel for an appellant has notice of a motion to dismiss an appeal and makes no reply thereto, it is too late, after the ease has been decided, to attempt to correct the record in a motion for rehearing.
(Syllabus by the Court.)
Appeal from District Court, Rogers County; T. L. Brown, Judge.
Frank Lewis Vian was convicted of robbery, and his punishment assessed at five years’ confinement in the penitentiary, and he appeals.
Appeal dismissed.
H. Jennings, for plaintiff in error.
Smith C. Matson, Asst. Atty. Gen., and J. I. Howard, Co. Atty., for the State.

Opinion:
FURMAN, P. J.
First. A copy of the case-made was not served upon counsel for the state until more than 60 days after the date of sentence. The statute provides that a case-made must be served upon opposing counsel within 30 days from date of sentence, unless this time is extended by order of the trial court. There was no such extension of time in this case. The case-made must therefore be stricken from the record.
Second. We find that a written notice of appeal was never served by the appellant upon the county attorney or the clerk of the court in which this case was tried, as is required by law. As no such notice has been served, we have failed to acquire jurisdiction of this case, and the appeal is therefore dismissed, with directions to the district court of Rogers county to proceed with the execution of its judgment.
ARMSTRONG and DOYEE, JJ., concur.