Case Name: Joel Heredia NARANJO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ernest ROE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-01-12
Citations: 85 F. App'x 598
Docket Number: No. 02-56757; D.C. No. CV-02-00068-GLT
Parties: Joel Heredia NARANJO, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Ernest ROE, Warden, Respondent—Appellee.
Judges: Before KOZINSKI, NOONAN, Circuit Judges, and SCHWARZER, Senior District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 85
Pages: 598–598

Head Matter:
Joel Heredia NARANJO, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Ernest ROE, Warden, Respondent—Appellee.
No. 02-56757.
D.C. No. CV-02-00068-GLT.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Dec. 2, 2003.
Decided Jan. 12, 2004.
Joel Heredia Naranjo, pro se, Corcoran, CA, Phillip I. Bronson, Encino, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.
Michael C. Keller, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.
Before KOZINSKI, NOONAN, Circuit Judges, and SCHWARZER, Senior District Judge.
The Honorable William W Schwarzer, Senior United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
ORDER
This appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because petitioner Joel Heredia Naranjo failed to file a timely notice of appeal and the district court found that Naranjo does not qualify for reopening of time under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). The mandate issued on January 2, 2004 is hereby withdrawn.
DISMISSED
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.