Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arthur Edward WILLIAMSON, Jr., Defendant-Appellant; United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arthur Edward Williamson, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-05-29
Citations: 279 F. App'x 235
Docket Number: Nos. 08-6113, 08-6291
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arthur Edward WILLIAMSON, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arthur Edward Williamson, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 279
Pages: 235–236

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arthur Edward WILLIAMSON, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arthur Edward Williamson, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 08-6113, 08-6291.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 22, 2008.
Decided: May 29, 2008.
Arthur Edward Williamson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Alan Lance Crick, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated cases, Arthur Edward Williamson, Jr., appeals the district court's orders denying his Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion and his motion requesting court records furnished without costs for appellate review. We dismiss the appeal of his Rule 60(b) motion for lack of jurisdiction because his notice of appeal was not timely filed. With respect to Williamson's appeal of his motion requesting court records, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Williamson, Nos. 3:06-cv-02363-HMH; CR-76-19 (D.S.C. Aug. 8, 2007; Feb. 5, 2008). Williamson's motion for certificate of appealability is denied as unnecessary. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.