Case Name: Michael W. MATHEWS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2013-11-19
Citations: 414 S.W.3d 48
Docket Number: No. ED 99639
Parties: Michael W. MATHEWS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., KURT S. ODENWALD, J., and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 414
Pages: 48–49

Head Matter:
Michael W. MATHEWS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 99639.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Nov. 19, 2013.
Timothy Forneris, Missouri Public Defender Office, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Foster, Attorney General, Daniel N. McPherson, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., KURT S. ODENWALD, J., and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Michael W. Mathews appeals from the motion court's "Conclusions of Law and Order" denying his Rule 29.15 Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence and Request for Evidentiary Hearing, alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their infor mation only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).