Case Name: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Napheace Jamal COOPER-REID, Petitioner
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2018-12-28
Citations: 199 A.3d 884
Docket Number: No. 571 MAL 2018
Parties: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent
v.
Napheace Jamal COOPER-REID, Petitioner
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 199
Pages: 884–884

Head Matter:
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent
v.
Napheace Jamal COOPER-REID, Petitioner
No. 571 MAL 2018
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
December 28, 2018
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 28th day of Decemnber, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:
Where a prosecutor's conduct causes a mistrial, and a defendant subsequently moves to bar retrial on double jeopardy grounds, what standard of review should a reviewing court apply to the trial court's factual finding regarding the prosecutor's intent?