Case Name: CHARLES SALES CORPORATION, Charles Sales Corporation of Orlando, Inc., and Joseph Gordon, Appellants, v. James G. HODGSKIN, also known as J. G. Hodgskin, Jean R. Hodgskin, Thomas P. Rausch, also known as T. P. Rausch, Margie M. Rausch, Audrey L. Nichols, also known as A. L. Nichols, each individually, and James G. Hodgskin, Thomas P. Rausch and Audrey L. Nichols d/b/a Jatco Company, a partnership, and First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Deland, and Aaron Nathan, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1970-07-22
Citations: 239 So. 2d 106
Docket Number: No. 69-253
Parties: CHARLES SALES CORPORATION, Charles Sales Corporation of Orlando, Inc., and Joseph Gordon, Appellants, v. James G. HODGSKIN, also known as J. G. Hodgskin, Jean R. Hodgskin, Thomas P. Rausch, also known as T. P. Rausch, Margie M. Rausch, Audrey L. Nichols, also known as A. L. Nichols, each individually, and James G. Hodgskin, Thomas P. Rausch and Audrey L. Nichols d/b/a Jateo Company, a partnership, and First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Deland, and Aaron Nathan, Appellees.
Judges: CROSS, C. J., and REED, J., and Mac-MILLAN, HUGH, Associate Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 239
Pages: 106–107

Head Matter:
CHARLES SALES CORPORATION, Charles Sales Corporation of Orlando, Inc., and Joseph Gordon, Appellants, v. James G. HODGSKIN, also known as J. G. Hodgskin, Jean R. Hodgskin, Thomas P. Rausch, also known as T. P. Rausch, Margie M. Rausch, Audrey L. Nichols, also known as A. L. Nichols, each individually, and James G. Hodgskin, Thomas P. Rausch and Audrey L. Nichols d/b/a Jateo Company, a partnership, and First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Deland, and Aaron Nathan, Appellees.
No. 69-253.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
July 22, 1970.
Rehearing Denied Sept. 18, 1970.
Eli H. Subin, of Roth, Segal & Levine, Orlando, for appellants.
William T. Moore, of Moore, Welbaum, Zook & Jones, Miami, for appellees Hodgskins, Rauschs, Nichols, Jateo Company and First Federal.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
On the basis of the briefs, record, and oral argument, we are of the opinion that the appellants have failed to demonstrate error and have thus failed to carry their burden on appeal. The judgment appealed from is affirmed.
Affirmed.
CROSS, C. J., and REED, J., and Mac-MILLAN, HUGH, Associate Judge, concur.