Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Nicholas N. COMPARATO, Appellant.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2018-10-16
Citations: 559 S.W.3d 922
Docket Number: No. ED 106589
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent,
v.
Nicholas N. COMPARATO, Appellant.
Judges: Before Roy L. Richter, P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., Angela T. Quigless, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 559
Pages: 922–922

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent,
v.
Nicholas N. COMPARATO, Appellant.
No. ED 106589
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Filed: October 16, 2018
Matthew G. Mueller, 920 Main Street, Suite 500, Kansas City, MO. 64105, for appellant.
Jared B. Stafford, Mary E. Weston, Co-Counsel, 1777 Washington Crossings, Ste 2305, Washington, MO. 63090, 133 E. Second Street, Hermann, MO. 65041, for respondent.
Jessica M. Steffan, 906 Olive Street, Suite 1130, St. Louis, MO. 63101, Anthony E. Rothert, Co-Counsel, 906 Olive Street, Suite 1130, St. Louis, MO. 63101, Gillian R. Wilcox, Co-Counsel, 406 West 34th Street, Suite 420, Kansas City, MO. 64111, for Amicus Curiae.
Before Roy L. Richter, P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., Angela T. Quigless, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Nicholas N. Comparato ("Defendant") appeals from the judgment of the circuit court convicting him of driving while his license was suspended or revoked. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 84.16(b) (2018).