Case Name: Ronald BRUNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Defendant-Appellee; Ronald Brunson, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. United States District Court, District of South Carolina; Central Intelligence Agency; Federal Bureau of Investigation; Steve Patterson, Intercity Broadcasting; NAACP, National Association Advancement Colored People; State Executive Director, NAACP; President Ruby Johnson, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-02-02
Citations: 463 F. App'x 195
Docket Number: Nos. 11-2088, 11-2097
Parties: Ronald BRUNSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Defendant—Appellee. Ronald Brunson, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. United States District Court, District of South Carolina; Central Intelligence Agency; Federal Bureau of Investigation; Steve Patterson, Intercity Broadcasting; NAACP, National Association Advancement Colored People; State Executive Director, NAACP; President Ruby Johnson, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 463
Pages: 195–195

Head Matter:
Ronald BRUNSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Defendant—Appellee. Ronald Brunson, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. United States District Court, District of South Carolina; Central Intelligence Agency; Federal Bureau of Investigation; Steve Patterson, Intercity Broadcasting; NAACP, National Association Advancement Colored People; State Executive Director, NAACP; President Ruby Johnson, Defendants—Appellees.
Nos. 11-2088, 11-2097.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 31, 2012.
Decided: Feb. 2, 2012.
Ronald Brunson, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated cases, Ronald Brunson seeks to appeal the magistrate judge's reports recommending that the district court, dismiss Brunson's complaints. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The orders Brunson seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor are they appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.