Case Name: In the Matter of Jennifer O. and Others, Children Alleged to be Neglected. Jefferson County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Mark L. O., Appellant; In the Matter of Jennifer O. and Others, Children Alleged to be Neglected. Jefferson County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Mark L. O., Appellant; In the Matter of Helen L. O., Respondent, v. Mark L. O., Appellant; In the Matter of Helen H., Respondent, v. Mark L. O., Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1999-04-29
Citations: 93 N.Y.2d 895
Docket Number: Appeal No. 1; Appeal No. 2; Appeal No. 3; Appeal No. 4
Parties: In the Matter of Jennifer O. and Others, Children Alleged to be Neglected. Jefferson County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Mark L. O., Appellant. In the Matter of Jennifer O. and Others, Children Alleged to be Neglected. Jefferson County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Mark L. O., Appellant. In the Matter of Helen L. O., Respondent, v Mark L. O., Appellant. In the Matter of Helen H., Respondent, v Mark L. O., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 93
Pages: 895–896

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Jennifer O. and Others, Children Alleged to be Neglected. Jefferson County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Mark L. O., Appellant. In the Matter of Jennifer O. and Others, Children Alleged to be Neglected. Jefferson County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Mark L. O., Appellant. In the Matter of Helen L. O., Respondent, v Mark L. O., Appellant. In the Matter of Helen H., Respondent, v Mark L. O., Appellant.
(Appeal No. 1.) (Appeal No. 2.) (Appeal No. 3.) (Appeal No. 4.)
Submitted February 16, 1999;
decided April 29, 1999

Opinion:
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order which dismissed the appeal from Family Court's March 9, 1995 order entered on appellant's consent to a finding of neglect, dismissed upon the ground that as to that order appellant is not a party aggrieved (see, CPLR 5511); motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order which affirmed Family Court's March 20, 1996 order adjudging that appellant violated a Family Court article 10 order of protection, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.