Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dewayne DUGAN, a.k.a. Fat Dugan, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-11-05
Citations: 494 F. App'x 969
Docket Number: No. 12-11563
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dewayne DUGAN, a.k.a. Fat Dugan, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before HULL, JORDAN and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 494
Pages: 969–970

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dewayne DUGAN, a.k.a. Fat Dugan, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-11563
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Nov. 5, 2012.
Lennard B. Register, III, Robert G. Davies, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Pensacola, FL, Michael Thomas Simpson, Pamela C. Marsh, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tallahassee, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Chet Kaufman, Randolph Patterson Murrell, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Tallahassee, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Dewayne Dugan, Atlanta, GA, pro se.
Before HULL, JORDAN and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Chet Kaufman, on behalf of Randolph P. Murrell, Federal Public Defender and appointed counsel for Dewayne Dugan in this appeal from the denial of an 18 U.S.C. § 8582(c)(2) sentence reduction motion, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 886 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's denial of Dugan's § 3582(c)(2) motion to reduce his sentence is AFFIRMED.