Case Name: Winans vs. Mason and others
Court: New York Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1861-05-15
Citations: 33 Barb. 522
Docket Number: 
Parties: Winans vs. Mason and others.
Judges: 
Reporter: Barbour's Supreme Court Reports
Volume: 33
Pages: 522–523

Head Matter:
Winans vs. Mason and others.
Whéré an attorney waited seven years after his client had settled with the other party and satisfied the judgment of record, and then moved to set aside the satisfaction, because his costs were not paid, the defendant with whom the settlement Was made having died in the meantime, it was held too late to make the motion, or to open a satisfaction of a judgment for such a purpose,
MOTION, by the plaintiff’s attorney, to set aside the satisfaction of a judgment.

Opinion:
Ingraham, J.
The judgment in this case was recovered in 1850. The plaintiff and defendants settled in 1854, when the plaintiff satisfied the judgment of record, and the attorney now, in 1861, moves to set aside the satisfaction because his costs were not paid. Since the settlement one of the defendants is dead, who had charge of the business and settlement. Whatever might have been the result if the attorney had moved in proper season, I have no hesitation in holding that he has, by his neglect, lost any lien on this judgment. After two years he ceased to be attorney, and could not have satisfied the judgment, or exercised any control over it. Ho other person but the plaintiff could then satisfy it, In the absence of any notice to the contrary, I think the defendants had good reason to presume that the plaintiff had settled with his attorney. But in addition thereto, he has waited seven years since the settlement, and until the defendant who made it is dead.
[At Chambers, New York,
May 15, 1861.
Ingraham, Justice.]
. It is too late to make such a motion, or to open a satisfaction of a judgment for such a purpose.
Motion denied,