Case Name: NEW JERSEY BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND MRS. ESTHER W. ROWE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1963-11-04
Citations: 41 N.J. 64
Docket Number: 
Parties: NEW JERSEY BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND MRS. ESTHER W. ROWE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 41
Pages: 64–64

Head Matter:
NEW JERSEY BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND MRS. ESTHER W. ROWE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Argued September 24, 1963
Decided November 4, 1963.
Mr. Michael J. O’Neil argued the cause for the appellant.
Mr. Sidney Beitman argued the cause for the respondent, Esther W. Rowe (Messrs. Kapelsohn, Lerner, Leuchter & Beitman, attorneys).
Mr. Edward A. Kaplan argued the cause for the respondent, Board of Review.
Messrs. Lum, Biunno & Tomplcins filed a brief amicus curiae (Mr. Vincent P. Biunno, of counsel).

Opinion:
Pee Cueiam.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Sullivan in the Appellate Division.
For affirmance—Chief Justice Weintbaub and Justices Jacobs, Peancis, Peoctok, Hall, Schettino and Hane-MAN-7.
For reversal—Hone.