Case Name: Cortez SHEPHERD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-12-04
Citations: 386 S.W.3d 912
Docket Number: No. ED 98068
Parties: Cortez SHEPHERD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: ■Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J. and GLENN A. NORTON, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 386
Pages: 912–912

Head Matter:
Cortez SHEPHERD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 98068.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Dec. 4, 2012.
Scott Thompson, Saint Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
■Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J. and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Cortez Shepherd appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).