Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Kenley Stanislas, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2011-11-22
Citations: 89 A.D.3d 1043
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kenley Stanislas, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 89
Pages: 1043–1044

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kenley Stanislas, Appellant.
[933 NYS2d 569]

Opinion:
The defendant's contention that his plea of guilty was not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily made because the Supreme Court failed to specifically enumerate certain of his constitutional rights is unpreserved for appellate review since he did not move to withdraw his plea on that ground prior to sentencing (see GPL 470.05 [2]; People v Reyes, 41 AD3d 620 [2007]; People v Watson, 19 AD3d 518 [2005]; People v Maddy, 110 AD2d 719 [1985]), and we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. Mastro, J.P., Balkin, Chambers and Sgroi, JJ., concur.