Case Name: Gerald Lee McCARTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William E. SMITH; Archie Bruton, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-04-06
Citations: 421 F. App'x 303
Docket Number: No. 11-6005
Parties: Gerald Lee McCARTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William E. SMITH; Archie Bruton, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 421
Pages: 303–304

Head Matter:
Gerald Lee McCARTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William E. SMITH; Archie Bruton, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 11-6005.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 31, 2011.
Decided: April 6, 2011.
Gerald Lee McCarty, Appellant pro se.
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Gerald Lee McCarty appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McCarty v. Smith, No. 5:09-ct-03126-D (E.D.N.C. Nov. 30, 2010). We deny McCarty's motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.