Case Name: Leslie Ann Brody, Respondent, v. Propark America, Appellant, and City of New York et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2017-04-20
Citations: 149 A.D.3d 576
Docket Number: 
Parties: Leslie Ann Brody, Respondent, v Propark America, Appellant, and City of New York et al., Respondents.
Judges: Concur — Acosta, J.P., Richter, Andrias, Kahn and Gesmer, JJ.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 149
Pages: 576–577

Head Matter:
Leslie Ann Brody, Respondent, v Propark America, Appellant, and City of New York et al., Respondents.
[50 NYS3d 275]

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (James E. d'Auguste, J.), entered December 1, 2005, which denied defendant Propark America's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Propark's motion for summary judgment was untimely, and Propark failed to offer "good cause," or any explanation at all, for the delay in making it (see CPLR 3212 [a]; Brill v City of New York, 2 NY3d 648, 652 [2004]).
Propark's argument that the court erred in granting defendant City's motion for summary judgment is not properly before this Court since Propark did not take an appeal from the order that granted the City's motion.
Concur — Acosta, J.P., Richter, Andrias, Kahn and Gesmer, JJ.