Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. William J. Lovell, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1998-06-18
Citations: 251 A.D.2d 819
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William J. Lovell, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 251
Pages: 819–820

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William J. Lovell, Appellant.
[674 NYS2d 806]

Opinion:
—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Castellino, J.), rendered December 13, 1996, convicting defendant following a nonjury trial of the crime of burglary in the third degree.
Defendant, having waived his right to a jury trial and stipu lated to certain facts, was found guilty of the crime of burglary in the third degree. Sentenced to a prison term of 2 to 6 years, defendant appeals. We reject defendant's contention that, because others with more extensive criminal histories have received more lenient sentences, his sentence is harsh and excessive. Defendant was previously convicted of the crime of burglary in the third degree and committed the instant offense one month following his release on parole. Considering this, as well as defendant's failure to present any evidence of extraordinary circumstances warranting a downward modification of his sentence, we conclude that the sentence imposed by County Court was neither harsh nor excessive (see, People v Hollenbeck, 234 AD2d 824, lv denied 89 NY2d 986).
Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.