Case Name: Arrow Novelty Co., Inc., et al. v. United States, protest 66/24572, etc. (New York); Isaac B. Cohen & Son Corp. v. United States, protests 66/27667, etc. (New York); M. Pressner & Co., Inc., and William Shaland Corp. v. United States, protests 66/64072 and 66/1404 (New York)
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1967
Citations: 59 Cust. Ct. 909
Docket Number: No. P67/412; No. P67/413; No. P67/414
Parties: Arrow Novelty Co., Inc., et al. v. United States, protest 66/24572, etc. (New York). Isaac B. Cohen & Son Corp. v. United States, protests 66/27667, etc. (New York). M. Pressner & Co., Inc., and William Shaland Corp. v. United States, protests 66/64072 and 66/1404 (New York).
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Volume: 59
Pages: 909–909

Head Matter:
No. P67/412.
No. P67/413.
No. P67/414.
Arrow Novelty Co., Inc., et al. v. United States, protest 66/24572, etc. (New York). Isaac B. Cohen & Son Corp. v. United States, protests 66/27667, etc. (New York). M. Pressner & Co., Inc., and William Shaland Corp. v. United States, protests 66/64072 and 66/1404 (New York).

Opinion:
Kiohardson, J.
In accordance witb stipulation of counsel that tbe merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of so-called "miniature hunting knives" similar in all material respects to those tbe subject of M. Pressner & Co. v. United States (56 Cust. Ct. 489, C.D. 2686), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.