Case Name: Kevin A. CRUMP, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-06-06
Citations: 193 S.W.3d 416
Docket Number: No. ED 86750
Parties: Kevin A. CRUMP, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J„ and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 193
Pages: 416–416

Head Matter:
Kevin A. CRUMP, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 86750.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
June 6, 2006.
Timothy Forneris, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Karen L. Kramer, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J„ and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Kevin A. Crump ("Movant"), appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. On July 22, 2003, Movant was found guilty by a jury of robbery in the first degree, section 569.020, RSMo 2000, and armed criminal action, section 571.015. On September 5, 2003, Movant was sentenced as a prior and persistent felony offender to concurrent terms of thirty years of imprisonment for robbery in the first degree and ten years of imprisonment for armed criminal action. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.
. All statutory references are to RSMo 2000, unless otherwise indicated.