Case Name: H. L. PROPERTIES, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. AEROJET-GENERAL CORPORATION, Defendant-Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Third-Party Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1972-11-13
Citations: 468 F.2d 1397
Docket Number: No. 72-2011
Parties: H. L. PROPERTIES, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. AEROJET-GENERAL CORPORATION, Defendant-Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 468
Pages: 1397–1397

Head Matter:
H. L. PROPERTIES, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. AEROJET-GENERAL CORPORATION, Defendant-Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.
No. 72-2011
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Nov. 13, 1972.
Rehearing Denied Dec. 19, 1972.
Robert W. Rust, U. S. Atty., Clemens Hagglund, Asst. U. S. Atty., Miami, Fla., Morton Hollander, James C. Hair, Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., for the United States.
A. Dan Killian, Jr., George L. Knight, Miami, Fla., Turner & Hodson, Vernon W. Turner, Michael Watkins, Homestead, Fla., James E. Glass, Welsh & Carroll, Smathers & Thompson, Earl D. Waldin, Jr., Miami, Fla., for appellees.
Before THORNBERRY, COLEMAN and INGRAHAM, Circuit Judges.
Rule 18, 5th Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5th Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
We affirm the judgment below on the basis of the District Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order, 331 F.Supp. 1006.
Affirmed.