Case Name: Thomas OJONG, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-08-11
Citations: 442 F. App'x 820
Docket Number: No. 10-2307
Parties: Thomas OJONG, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before GREGORY, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 442
Pages: 820–821

Head Matter:
Thomas OJONG, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 10-2307.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 26, 2011.
Decided: Aug. 11, 2011.
Danielle Beach-Oswald, Beach-Oswald Immigration Law Associates, PC, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Tony West, Associate Attorney General, Anh-Thu P. Mai-Windle, Senior Litigation Counsel, James A. Hurley, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Before GREGORY, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Thomas Ojong, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reopen as untimely and numerically barred. We have reviewed the administrative record and find no abuse of discretion in the denial of relief on Ojong's motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1008.2(a), (c) (2011). We accordingly deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Ojong, (B.I.A. Oct. 26, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.