Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven JOBE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-11-14
Citations: 81 F. App'x 221
Docket Number: No. 03-10135; D.C. No. CR-00-00258-2-DAE
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Steven JOBE, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 81
Pages: 221–221

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Steven JOBE, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 03-10135.
D.C. No. CR-00-00258-2-DAE.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 10, 2003.
Decided Nov. 14, 2003.
J. Michael Seabright, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Honolulu, HI, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Alexander Silvert, Appointed Fed. Public Defender, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Honolulu, HI, for Defendants Appellant.
Before KOZINSKI, SILVERMAN and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Steven Jobe appeals the district court's judgment revoking probation and imposing a 24-month sentence. He originally pleaded guilty to a counterfeiting conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Jobe's counsel has filed a brief stating that he finds no meritorious issues for review, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.