Case Name: NEWMAN v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1950-08-22
Citations: 184 F.2d 515
Docket Number: No. 12423
Parties: NEWMAN v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 184
Pages: 515–516

Head Matter:
NEWMAN v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al.
No. 12423.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
Aug. 22, 1950.
Rehearing Denied Oct. 2, 1950.
See 185 F.2d 392.
Emil Newman, in pro. per.
Dion R. Holm, City Atty., Thomas M. O’Connor, Deputy City Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellees City & County of San Francisco, and Elmer E. Robinson.
Fred N. Howser, Atty. Gen., Clarence A. Linn, Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellees State of Cal., Fred N. Howser & Session (appearing specially).
Before STEPHENS and ORR, Circuit Judges, and McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This appeal is from an order which grants a motion to dismiss an action, but did not dismiss it. Such an order is not a final decision within the meaning of 28 U.S.C.A. § 1291 and is not appealable. See, Blanco v. United States of America, 9 Cir., 184 F. 2d 117. The appeal is therefore, dismissed.