Case Name: POST-NEWSWEEK STATIONS FLORIDA, INC., Petitioner, v. CITY OF MIAMI, et al., Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2003-12-18
Citations: 863 So. 2d 1190
Docket Number: No. SC03-530
Parties: POST-NEWSWEEK STATIONS FLORIDA, INC., Petitioner, v. CITY OF MIAMI, et al., Respondents.
Judges: ANSTEAD, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 863
Pages: 1190–1191

Head Matter:
POST-NEWSWEEK STATIONS FLORIDA, INC., Petitioner, v. CITY OF MIAMI, et al., Respondents.
No. SC03-530.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Dec. 18, 2003.
Karen Williams Kammer of Mitrani, Ry-nor, Adamsky & McCaulay, P.A., Miami, FL, for Petitioner.
Alejandro Vilarello, City Attorney, and Charles C. Mays and Regine Monestime, Assistant City Attorneys, Miami, FL; Katherine Fernandez Rundle, State Attorney, and Angelica D. Zayas, Assistant State Attorney, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami, FL; and Benedict P. Kuehne and Susan Dmitrovsky of Sale & Kuehne, P.A., Miami, FL, for Respondents.

Opinion:
WELLS, J.
We initially accepted jurisdiction to review City of Miami v. PosF-Neiusweek Stations Florida, Inc., 837 So.2d 1002 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002), a decision of the district court of appeal certifying a question to be of great public importance pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4) of the Florida Constitution. Upon further consideration, we have now determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, this review proceeding is hereby dismissed.
It is so ordered.
ANSTEAD, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.