Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Desmond WARD, a/k/a David A. King, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-10-26
Citations: 348 F. App'x 872
Docket Number: No. 09-7068
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Desmond WARD, a/k/a David A. King, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 348
Pages: 872–873

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Desmond WARD, a/k/a David A. King, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 09-7068.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 20, 2009.
Decided: Oct. 26, 2009.
Desmond Ward, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Desmond Ward appeals the district court's order granting his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) and lowering his sentence from 235 months to 188 months of imprisonment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Contrary to Ward's arguments on appeal, he is not entitled to a further reduction in his sentence. See United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247, 257 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 2401, 173 L.Ed.2d 1296 (2009). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Ward, No. 3:96-cr-00029-GCM-2 (W.D.N.C. May 27, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.