Case Name: MAE J. McGUIRE, Appellant, v. FRANK H. McGUIRE, Respondent; FRANK H. McGUIRE, Respondent, v. MAE J. McGUIRE, Appellant
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1933-02-16
Citations: 129 Cal. App. 644
Docket Number: Civ. No. 8884
Parties: MAE J. McGUIRE, Appellant, v. FRANK H. McGUIRE, Respondent. FRANK H. McGUIRE, Respondent, v. MAE J. McGUIRE, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports
Volume: 129
Pages: 644–645

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 8884.
Second Appellate District, Division One.
February 16, 1933.]
MAE J. McGUIRE, Appellant, v. FRANK H. McGUIRE, Respondent. FRANK H. McGUIRE, Respondent, v. MAE J. McGUIRE, Appellant.
Roy Maggart, Allen Miller and Alfred Jay Luke for Appellant.
Bailie, Turner & Lake and Richard A. Turner for Respondent.

Opinion:
HOUSER, J.
On presentation of a motion by respondent to dismiss the appeal from the judgment, because of the failure of appellant to file transcript within the time prescribed by statute and the rules of this court, as well for the reason that appellant heretofore has accepted payment of a portion of the benefits awarded to her by the judgment—it appearing to the satisfaction of this court that the said ultimate facts are fully supported by affidavits on behalf of respondent, and which facts are not controverted by affidavit or otherwise by appellant, it is ordered that said motion be and it is granted; and in accordance therewith, that said appeal be and it is dismissed. (See Rules I, V, VI and XI of this court; secs. 650, 659, 939 and 953a, Code Civ. Proc.; People v. Lambert, 96 Cal. App. 381, 382 [274 Pac. 401]; Coats v. Coats, 146 Cal. 443, 444 [80 Pac. 694]. Also, Storke v. Storke, 132 Cal. 349, 353 [64 Pac. 578]; People v. Burns, 78 Cal. 645, 646 [21 Pac. 540] ; In re Baby, 87 Cal. 200, 202 [25 Pac. 405, 22 Am. St. Rep. 239]; Estate of Shaver, 131 Cal. 219 [63 Pac. 340].)
Conrey, P. J., and York, J., concurred.