Case Name: AMERICAN BLOWER CORPORATION, RESPONDENT, v. SEABOARD SURETY COMPANY, APPELLANT; AMERICAN RADIATOR COMPANY, RESPONDENT, v. SEABOARD SURETY COMPANY, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1934-04-12
Citations: 112 N.J.L. 496
Docket Number: 
Parties: AMERICAN BLOWER CORPORATION, RESPONDENT, v. SEABOARD SURETY COMPANY, APPELLANT. AMERICAN RADIATOR COMPANY, RESPONDENT, v. SEABOARD SURETY COMPANY, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 112
Pages: 496–497

Head Matter:
AMERICAN BLOWER CORPORATION, RESPONDENT, v. SEABOARD SURETY COMPANY, APPELLANT. AMERICAN RADIATOR COMPANY, RESPONDENT, v. SEABOARD SURETY COMPANY, APPELLANT.
Submitted February 16, 1934
Decided April 12, 1934.
For the appellants, Frederick F. Richardson.
For the respondents, Smith & Slingerland.

Opinion:
Pee Curiam.
The determinative question involved in these two suits is identical with that of Johnson Service Co. v. Seaboard Surety Co., 112 N. J. L. 493. The essential facts are also identical in character, and are sufficiently set out, mutatis mutandis, in the decision of Judge Porter in the Johnson case. For the reasons there given, the two judgments now under review will be affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Trbnchard, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskiric, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.