Case Name: GABEL v. BROOKLYN, Q. C. & S. R. CO.
Court: New York Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1908-11-24
Citations: 112 N.Y.S. 1047
Docket Number: 
Parties: GABEL v. BROOKLYN, Q. C. & S. R. CO.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 112
Pages: 1047–1049

Head Matter:
GABEL v. BROOKLYN, Q. C. & S. R. CO.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
November 24, 1908.)
Tbial (§ 234*)—Instructions.
♦For other cases see same topic & § numbeb in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep’r Indexes
A requested charge, in an action for injury sustained in attempting to board a street car, that, if the jury believed the witnesses for defendant, their verdict should be for defendant, was properly refused.
[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Trial, Cent. Dig. §§ 534-538; Dec. Dig. § 234.*]
MacLean, J., dissenting.
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Second District.
Action by David Gabel against the Brooklyn, Queens County & Suburban Railroad Company for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
Affirmed.
Argued before GIEDERSEEEVE, P. J., and MacEEAN and SEA-BURY, JJ.
George D. Yeomans (A. M. Williams, of counsel), for appellant.
David Drechsler, for respondent.

Opinion:
SEABURY, J.
The charge which the counsel for the defendant requested the court to make was incorrect in form. The defendant's witnesses testified to facts tending to establish that the agents of the defendant were free from negligence, and that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence. The request sought to have the court sub mit to the jury only the question of the credibility of the defendant's witnesses, instead of the question as to the negligence of the plaintiff and defendant. The court was correct in refusing to make the charge in the form in which it was requested. Kellegher v. 42d St., etc., Ry. Co., 171 N. Y. 309, 63 N. E. 1096. In Dolan v. D. H. C. Co., 71 N. Y. 285, 290, a request similar in its nature was before the court and Church, C. J., said:
"It is not strictly proper to refer to the testimony of a witness, and ask the court to charge that, if the jury believe that witness, they must find in a certain way, or that a certain legal conclusion follows, because it prevents the jury from construing the evidence and determining what facts it does establish.''
The judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.