Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Willet J. Wood, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1983-06-07
Citations: 59 N.Y.2d 811
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Willet J. Wood, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 59
Pages: 811–812

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Willet J. Wood, Appellant.
Submitted May 5, 1983;
decided June 7, 1983
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Robert J. Lunn for appellant.
Donald O. Chesworth, Jr., District Attorney CMelvin Bressler of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of County Court should be reversed and the information dismissed.
To support a conviction under subdivision 5 of section 240.25 of the Penal Law, the People must establish that the defendant had "engage[d] in a course of conduct or repeatedly commit[ted] acts which alarmfed] or seriously annoy[ed]" another person and -had no legitimate purpose. (Penal Law, § 240.25, subd 5; People v Chasserot, 30 NY2d 898.) Because no evidence was presented at trial that defendant's conduct was anything other than an isolated incident, the People failed to establish that defendant was guilty of harassment under the subdivision charged.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons concur in memorandum.
Order reversed, etc.