Case Name: Samuel D. Hinman, Respondent, v. William H. Hare, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1887-01-18
Citations: 104 N.Y. 641
Docket Number: 
Parties: Samuel D. Hinman, Respondent, v. William H. Hare, Appellant.
Judges: Rucee, Oh. J., concurs; Rapallo and Andbews, J J., concur in result \ Danfobth, J., reads for affirmance; Finch, J., concurs. Judgment reversed.
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 104
Pages: 641–641

Head Matter:
Samuel D. Hinman, Respondent, v. William H. Hare, Appellant.
(Argued March 17, 1886 ;
decided January 18, 1887.)
As a majority of the court did not concur in the opinion written in support of the decision, this case is not reported.
Stephen P. Nash and Samuel Hand for appellant.
Haley Fislce and William Henry Arnoux for respondent.

Opinion:
Earl, J.,
reads for reversal and new trial;
Rucee, Oh. J., concurs; Rapallo and Andbews, J J., concur in result \ Danfobth, J., reads for affirmance; Finch, J., concurs. Judgment reversed.