Case Name: Helen E. T. Kelly, petitioner-respondent, v. William J. Kelly, defendant-appellant
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1937-01-22
Citations: 121 N.J. Eq. 255
Docket Number: 
Parties: Helen E. T. Kelly, petitioner-respondent, v. William J. Kelly, defendant-appellant.
Judges: For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 13.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 121
Pages: 255–256

Head Matter:
Helen E. T. Kelly, petitioner-respondent, v. William J. Kelly, defendant-appellant.
[Submitted October term, 1936.
Decided January 22d, 1937.]
Mr. Louis L. Ilendler, for the defendant-appellant.
Messrs. Theodore Strong «£• Son (Mr. Stephen V. R. Strong), for the petitioner-respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We are satisfied from our examination of the proofs that the findings of the learned advisory master were proper.
The decree is, therefore, affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.