Case Name: K.T., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2014-03-12
Citations: 162 So. 3d 13
Docket Number: No. 4D12-4295
Parties: K.T., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: STEVENSON, CIKLIN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 162
Pages: 13–13

Head Matter:
K.T., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D12-4295.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
March 12, 2014.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Ellen Griffin, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melvin G. Mosier, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Following a no contest plea to charges of burglary of a dwelling and petit theft, defendant K.T. was placed on probation and ordered to pay restitution. In this appeal, K.T. challenges the order of restitution, arguing the evidence was insufficient to establish the fair market value of the stolen items at the time of the theft. Accepting the State's concession of error, we reverse the order of restitution and remand for further proceedings. See Thompson v. State, 68 So.3d 425, 426 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (stating "amount of restitution is established through evidence of fair market value of the stolen items at the time of the theft" and listing factors to be considered, including depreciation); Soriano v. State, 968 So.2d 112, 114-15 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (holding victim's unsubstantiated opinion or speculation as to fair market value at the time of the theft is insufficient to sustain a restitution order).
Reversed and Remanded.
STEVENSON, CIKLIN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.