Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Thomas INGRASSIA, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-04-11
Citations: 187 S.W.3d 918
Docket Number: No. ED 85937
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Thomas INGRASSIA, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY and BOOKER T. SHAW, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 187
Pages: 918–919

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Thomas INGRASSIA, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 85937.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
April 11, 2006.
Ellen H. Flottman, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Shaun J. Mackelprang, Asst. Atty. Gen. Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY and BOOKER T. SHAW, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The defendant, Thomas Ingrassia, appeals his conviction in the Circuit Court of St. Francois County for the class D felony of property damage in the first degree, in violation of section 569.100 RSMo. (2000). The defendant claims there was insufficient evidence the damage exceeded $750, as required for conviction pursuant to section 569.100. Finding no error, we affirm.
We have reviewed the parties' briefs and the record on appeal. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the trial court's judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).