Case Name: Jaynee WILL, Plaintiff/Respondent, and Scott Will, Plaintiff, v. PEPOSE VISION INSTITUTE, P.C., Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2013-06-11
Citations: 400 S.W.3d 864
Docket Number: No. ED 97910
Parties: Jaynee WILL, Plaintiff/Respondent, and Scott Will, Plaintiff, v. PEPOSE VISION INSTITUTE, P.C., Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J. and LISA S. VAN AMBURG, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 400
Pages: 864–864

Head Matter:
Jaynee WILL, Plaintiff/Respondent, and Scott Will, Plaintiff, v. PEPOSE VISION INSTITUTE, P.C., Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 97910.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
June 11, 2013.
Teresa Young, Angela Pozzo, co-counsel, Philip Willman, co-counsel, Andrew Eastman, co-counsel, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Leonard Cervantes, Jennifer Suttmoel-ler, co-counsel, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J. and LISA S. VAN AMBURG, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Pepose Vision Institute, P.C. appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting Jaynee Will and Scott Will's motion for new trial.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).