Case Name: John MUSACCHIA, et al., Appellants, v. Bob HYDE, etc., et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-06-26
Citations: 562 So. 2d 449
Docket Number: No. 89-2745
Parties: John MUSACCHIA, et al., Appellants, v. Bob HYDE, etc., et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and LEVY and GERSTEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 562
Pages: 449–449

Head Matter:
John MUSACCHIA, et al., Appellants, v. Bob HYDE, etc., et al., Appellees.
No. 89-2745.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
June 26, 1990.
Rosenberg, Reisman & Stein and Gary Stein, Miami, for appellants.
Beckmeyer & Mulick and Carl Beckmeyer, for appellees.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and LEVY and GERSTEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
There is no abuse of discretion in the order on review granting the appellees a new trial after a jury verdict for the plaintiffs-appellants, see Smith v. Brown, 525 So.2d 868 (Fla.1988); Cloud v. Fallis, 110 So.2d 669 (Fla.1959), and it is therefore affirmed. This action is taken without prejudice to reconsideration of the appellants' motion to amend pleadings and for further discovery. The ground upon which the motion was previously denied, untimeliness, is no longer pertinent in view of the order requiring a new trial, which we have now affirmed.