Case Name: Herman v. Harborcreek Township, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1974-07-01
Citations: 458 Pa. 202
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 145
Parties: Herman v. Harborcreek Township, Appellant.
Judges: Before Jones, C. J., Ea-gen, O’Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix and Mandarino, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 458
Pages: 202–203

Head Matter:
Herman v. Harborcreek Township, Appellant.
Submitted March 20,1974.
Before Jones, C. J., Ea-gen, O’Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix and Mandarino, JJ.
Eugene J. Brew, Jr., and Dale and Brew, for appellant.
Andrew J. Conner and Dunn & Conner, for appellees.
July 1, 1974:

Opinion:
Opinion
Per Curiam,
The decree of the court below, sustaining in part and overruling in part appellant's preliminary objections to appellees' complaint in equity, is neither a final decree which "terminates the litigation between the parties to the suit by precluding a party from further action in that court", James Banda, Inc. v. Virginia Manor Apartments, Inc., 451 Pa. 408, 410, 303 A. 2d 925 (1973) [quoting from Stadler v. Mt. Oliver Borough, 373 Pa. 316, 318, 95 A.2d 776 (1953)], nor an interlocutory decree on a question of jurisdiction made appealable under the Act of March 5, 1925, P. L. 23, 12 P.S. §672, Miller Estate v. Department of Highways, 424 Pa. 477, 227 A.2d 679 (1967). The decree is, therefore, not appealable, and the appeal therefrom must be quashed.
It is so ordered. Costs on appellant.