Case Name: Thornward H. Forsstrom and Another, Respondents, v. Utility Steel Co., Inc., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1928-06-21
Citations: 132 Misc. 409
Docket Number: 
Parties: Thornward H. Forsstrom and Another, Respondents, v. Utility Steel Co., Inc., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 132
Pages: 409–410

Head Matter:
Thornward H. Forsstrom and Another, Respondents, v. Utility Steel Co., Inc., Appellant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
June 21, 1928.
John G. Turnbull, for the appellant.
Alexander & Ash, for the respondents.
Revg. 131 Misc. 471.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Levine v. Hogan-Levine Co. (200 App. Div. 487) has no application whatever to this case. Here there was no performance, no tender of performance, and these plaintiffs assumed all the obligations of their assignor. Even if the latter element were not present, the counterclaim would be available to the defendant under section 267 of the Civil Practice Act, subdivisions 1 and 2.
Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and complaint dismissed on the merits, with costs.
All concur; present, Bijur, Levy and Crain, JJ.