Case Name: PICARINO v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1928-05-16
Citations: 8 S.W.2d 142
Docket Number: No. 11635
Parties: PICARINO v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 8
Pages: 142–143

Head Matter:
PICARINO v. STATE.
(No. 11635.)
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
May 16, 1928.
Rehearing Denied June 23, 1928.
F. G. Vaughn, of Beaumont, for appellant.
A. A. Dawson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
I-IAWKINS, J.
Conviction is for theft of an automobile; punishment being assessed at two years in the penitentiary.
The state's attorney cálls our attention to the fact that the motion for new trial was overruled on the 15th day of October, at which time 90 days was given in which to file statement of facts and bills of exception. This time expired On the 13th day of January, and the statement of facts and bills of exception were not filed until the 14th day of January,-one day too late to permit consideration. Article 760, C. C. P. 1925; Johnson v. State, 104 Tex. Cr. R. 384, 283 S. W. 807; Daniel v. State, 104 Tex. Cr. R. 604, 286 S. W. 221; Williams v. State, 108 Tex. Cr. R. 124, 299 S. W. 258; Chisholm et al. v. State, 108 Tex. Cr. R. 401, 1 S.W.(2d) 613.
The judgment must be affirmed without reference to the statement of facts or bills of exception, and it is so ordered.