Case Name: Tracy Wayne O'HARA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-01-18
Citations: 555 So. 2d 945
Docket Number: No. 89-196
Parties: Tracy Wayne O’HARA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: DANIEL, C.J., and COBB and SHARP, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 555
Pages: 945–945

Head Matter:
Tracy Wayne O’HARA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 89-196.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Jan. 18, 1990.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Brynn Newton, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Kellie A. Nielan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm in this cause, but certify to the Florida Supreme Court, as a question of great public importance, the same question certified in Blankenship v. State, 545 So.2d 908 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989), and State v. Burch, 545 So.2d 279 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989):
IS SECTION 893.13, FLORIDA STATUTES (1987), CONSTITUTIONAL?
DANIEL, C.J., and COBB and SHARP, JJ., concur.