Case Name: Arndt v. P & M Ltd.
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2011-06-17
Citations: 128 Ohio St. 3d 1525
Docket Number: 2011-0842
Parties: Arndt v. P & M Ltd.
Judges: 
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 128
Pages: 1525–1525

Head Matter:
2011-0842.
Arndt v. P & M Ltd.

Opinion:
Portage App. No. 2009-P-0088, 2011-Ohio-649. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right.
Upon review of the memorandum in support of jurisdiction, it is evident that Edward W. Smith has not filed a timely motion for admission pro hac vice pursuant to S.Ct.Prae.R. 1.2. Therefore, it is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that Edward W. Smith is stricken from the memorandum in support of jurisdiction for failure to comply with S.Ct.Prae.R. 1.2 and Gov.Bar R. XII(2)(A)(6)(a)-(e).