Case Name: Glenn MANSFIELD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2010-12-14
Citations: 326 S.W.3d 853
Docket Number: No. ED 94207
Parties: Glenn MANSFIELD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 326
Pages: 853–853

Head Matter:
Glenn MANSFIELD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 94207.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Dec. 14, 2010.
Jessica M. Hathaway, Saint Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Jamie Pamela Rasmussen, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Glenn Mansfield appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).