Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kendall Ladell BLUE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-11-28
Citations: 671 F. App'x 59
Docket Number: No. 16-6916
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kendall Ladell BLUE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 671
Pages: 59–59

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kendall Ladell BLUE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-6916
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: November 22, 2016
Decided: November 28, 2016
Kendall Ladell Blue, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Jason Cameron, Office of the United States Attorney, Rudy E. Renfer, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpubhshed opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kendall Ladell Blue appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion, in which Blue sought a reduction of his 252-month sentence based on Amendment 782 of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See United States v. Mann, 709 F.3d 301, 304 (4th Cir. 2013) (reviewing district court's decision under § 3583(c)(2) for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Blue, No. 7:11-cr-00135-D-l (E.D.N.C. June 13, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED