Case Name: James L. DELOACH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-10-16
Citations: 831 So. 2d 691
Docket Number: No. 3D01-2904
Parties: James L. DELOACH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before JORGENSON, COPE, and GODERICH, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 831
Pages: 691–692

Head Matter:
James L. DELOACH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D01-2904.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 16, 2002.
Rehearing Denied Dec. 11, 2002.
James L. DeLoach, in proper person.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Fredericka Sands, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before JORGENSON, COPE, and GODERICH, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Novaton v. State, 634 So.2d 607 (Fla.1994); Hubbard v. State, 662 So.2d 746 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (holding that a negotiated sentence precludes appeal or collateral challenge of conviction and sentence on double jeopardy grounds apart from an allegation of ineffective assistance of counsel); see also Hurlburt v. State, 807 So.2d 687 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (holding that habitual offender sentences are not affected by the unconstitutionality of the 1995 sentencing guidelines); Hepburn v. State, 778 So.2d 448 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).