Case Name: In the Matter of Shavar B., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. Administration for Children's Services, Respondent; Wayne M., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Kimberly B., a Child Alleged to be Abused and Neglected. Administration for Children's Services, Respondent; Wayne M., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.) In the Matter of Bryton M., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. Administration for Children's Services, Respondent; Wayne M., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 3.)
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2004-05-10
Citations: 7 A.D.3d 619
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Shavar B., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent; Wayne M., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Kimberly B., a Child Alleged to be Abused and Neglected. Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent; Wayne M., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.) In the Matter of Bryton M., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent; Wayne M., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 3.)
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 7
Pages: 619–620

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Shavar B., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent; Wayne M., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Kimberly B., a Child Alleged to be Abused and Neglected. Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent; Wayne M., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.) In the Matter of Bryton M., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent; Wayne M., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 3.)
[776 NYS2d 503]

Opinion:
In three related child protective proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, Wayne M. appeals from three fact-finding orders of the Family Court, Queens County (Salinitro, J.), all dated November 6, 2002 (one in each proceeding), which, after a fact-finding hearing, found that he sexually abused and neglected the child Kimberly B., and derivatively abused and neglected the children Bryton M. and Shavar B.
Ordered that the fact-finding orders are affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
A preponderance of the evidence supported the Family Court's determination that the appellant sexually abused and neglected Kimberly B. (see Matter of Nicole V., 71 NY2d 112 [1987]; Matter of Westchester County Dept. of Social Servs. [Adam B.] v Laura B., 216 AD2d 402 [1995]) and derivatively abused and neglected Shavar B. and Bryton M. (see Matter of Jasmine A., 295 AD2d 504 [2002]; Matter of Dutchess County Dept. of Social Servs. [Douglas E., III] v Douglas E., Jr., 191 AD2d 694 [1993]). The testimony of an expert in pediatrics, with a specialty in the field of child abuse, corroborated Kimberly's allegations of sexual abuse (see Matter of Nicole V., supra at 122; Matter of Lamarr P., 237 AD2d 609 [1997]; Family Ct Act § 1046 [a] [vi]). Evidence of Kimberly's subsequent recantations does not mandate setting aside the finding of abuse (see Matter of Jenna R., 207 AD2d 403 [1994]; Matter of Lisa S., 187 AD2d 435 [1992]).
The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit. Florio, J.P., Townes, Cozier and Mastro, JJ., concur.