Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jasmine Milton, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2017-11-09
Citations: 155 A.D.3d 1607
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jasmine Milton, Appellant.
Judges: Present— Smith, J.P., Centra, Carni, Curran and Troutman, JJ.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 155
Pages: 1607–1607

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jasmine Milton, Appellant.
[63 NYS3d 292]

Opinion:
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Deborah A. Haendiges, J.), rendered January 27, 2016. The judgment convicted defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of assault in the first degree.
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her upon her plea of guilty of assault in the first degree (Penal Law § 120.10 [1]). Contrary to defendant's contention, the record establishes that she knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived her right to appeal (see People v Bryant, 28 NY3d 1094, 1096 [2016]; People v Walker, 151 AD3d 1730, 1730 [4th Dept 2017], lv denied 29 NY3d 1135 [2017]). The fact that defendant simply answered "Iy]es" to Supreme Court's questions does not render the waiver invalid (see generally People v VanDeViver, 56 AD3d 1118, 1118 [4th Dept 2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 931 [2009], denied reconsideration 12 NY3d 788 [2009]). The valid waiver encompasses defendant's challenge to the court's suppression ruling (see People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337, 342 [2015]; People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831, 833 [1999]), and her challenge to the severity of the sentence (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255-256 [2006]; People v Carr, 147 AD3d 1506, 1506 [4th Dept 2017], lv denied 29 NY3d 1030 [2017]).
Present— Smith, J.P., Centra, Carni, Curran and Troutman, JJ.