Case Name: BOSTON & P. DISPATCH EXPRESS CO. v. METROPOLITAN ST. RY. CO
Court: New York Court of Common Pleas
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1895-12-02
Citations: 35 N.Y.S. 1103
Docket Number: 
Parties: BOSTON & P. DISPATCH EXPRESS CO. v. METROPOLITAN ST. RY. CO.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 35
Pages: 1103–1104

Head Matter:
BOSTON & P. DISPATCH EXPRESS CO. v. METROPOLITAN ST. RY. CO.
(Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.
December 2, 1895.)
Action by the Boston & Providence Dispatch Express Company against the Metropolitan Street-Railway Company for injuries to plaintiff’s horse. A judgment in favor of plaintiff was reversed (35 N. Y. Supp. 134), and plaintiff moves for a reargument.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
No ground is presented upon this motion for which, within the provisions of rule 16 of the general term of this court, a reargument of the appeal may be had. The position of the witness Miller when he saw the accident, the opinion of officer Lake as to the manner in which the plaintiff's driver was driving, the testimony of the driver that he looked up and down the track, and the fact that part of the wagon was upon the outer rail at the time of the collision, are not decisive of the case. In considering the appeal from a district court, we are not concluded hy the absence of a motion to dismiss the complaint at the close of the testimony. Motion denied, with $10 costs.