Case Name: PENNZOIL COMPANY, a Corporation of California, and Pennzoil Company, a corporation of Pennsylvania, Appellants, v. Harold C. HALL (trading as Clayton Oil Company), Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1946-10-15
Citations: 157 F.2d 519
Docket Number: No. 10180
Parties: PENNZOIL COMPANY, a Corporation of California, and Pennzoil Company, a corporation of Pennsylvania, Appellants, v. Harold C. HALL (trading as Clayton Oil Company), Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 157
Pages: 519–519

Head Matter:
PENNZOIL COMPANY, a Corporation of California, and Pennzoil Company, a corporation of Pennsylvania, Appellants, v. Harold C. HALL (trading as Clayton Oil Company), Appellee.
No. 10180.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Oct. 15, 1946.
John S. Powers, of Buffalo, N. Y., and Allen & Allen, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellant.
Robert C. McIntosh, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellee.
Before MARTIN, McALLISTER, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This case came on to be heard on the record and the briefs and oral arguments of counsel. And it appearing that the findings of the district court are substantially supported by evidence and are not clearly erroneous, and that the conclusions of law of the district court are correct, the judgment below is affirmed.