Case Name: HAROLD J. RUVOLDT, AND HAROLD J. RUVOLDT, JR., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. JAMES A. TUMULTY, JR., PROSECUTOR OF HUDSON COUNTY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1969-10-22
Citations: 107 N.J. Super. 494
Docket Number: 
Parties: HAROLD J. RUVOLDT, AND HAROLD J. RUVOLDT, JR., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. JAMES A. TUMULTY, JR., PROSECUTOR OF HUDSON COUNTY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 107
Pages: 494–494

Head Matter:
HAROLD J. RUVOLDT, AND HAROLD J. RUVOLDT, JR., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. JAMES A. TUMULTY, JR., PROSECUTOR OF HUDSON COUNTY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued October 20, 1969
Decided October 22, 1969.
Before Judges, Goldmans, Lewis and Matthews.
Mr. Gregory J. Gastano, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant (Mr. James A. Tumulty, Jr., Hudson County Prosecutor, attorney pro se).
Mr. Harold J. Ruvoldt, Jr. argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Ruvoldt & Ruvoldt, attorneys pro se.
Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General, filed a statement in lieu of brief (Mr. Kenneth M. Olex, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This matter has been heard on an accelerated basis at the request of the parties.
We affirm substantially for the reasons expressed in the oral opinion of Assignment Judge Artaserse. 107 N. J. Super. 545. Costs to' plaintiffs.