Case Name: WILLIAM F. HALL, Appellant, v. Manfred (Fred) MAASS, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1993-05-19
Citations: 120 Or. App. 528
Docket Number: 90C11608; CA A72971
Parties: WILLIAM F. HALL, Appellant, v. Manfred (Fred) MAASS, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, Respondent.
Judges: Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Durham, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 120
Pages: 528–529

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted April 5,
reversed and remanded May 19, 1993
WILLIAM F. HALL, Appellant, v. Manfred (Fred) MAASS, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, Respondent.
(90C11608; CA A72971)
852 P2d 966
James F. Evans, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.
Stephanie Andrus, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Diane S. Lefkow, Assistant Attorney General, Salem.
Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Durham, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
In this habeas corpus proceeding, plaintiff appeals an order allowing defendant's motion to strike his replication. ORS 34.680(2). We reverse.
In March, 1990, plaintiff suffered a heart attack while incarcerated and was not taken to the hospital for 16 hours. He alleges that he still suffers from serious heart and circulatory problems that are not being treated promptly and that, as a consequence of those delays, he receives constitutionally inadequate medical care. Plaintiff states sufficient facts in support of his claim. ORS 34.362(2). The seriousness of the medical condition and the alleged lack of treatment requires immediate judicial scrutiny, and there is no other timely remedy. ORS 34.362(2). The replication stated a claim for habeas corpus relief.
Reversed and remanded.