Case Name: In the Interest of N.A.P., Appellant, W.S. (Mother), L.S. (Father), Defendant, v. Juvenile Officer, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-05-06
Citations: 103 S.W.3d 909
Docket Number: No. WD 61025
Parties: In the Interest of N.A.P., Appellant, W.S. (Mother), L.S. (Father), Defendant, v. Juvenile Officer, Respondent.
Judges: Before SPINDEN, P.J., BRECKENRIDGE and NEWTON, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 103
Pages: 909–909

Head Matter:
In the Interest of N.A.P., Appellant, W.S. (Mother), L.S. (Father), Defendant, v. Juvenile Officer, Respondent.
No. WD 61025.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
May 6, 2003.
Kimberly A. Carrington, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
Donald L. Cain, Melissa Stanosheck, Co-Counsel, Kansas City, MO, for respondent.
Before SPINDEN, P.J., BRECKENRIDGE and NEWTON, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
N.A.P. appeals from the judgment in a delinquency proceeding that found that he committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the class A felony of statutory sodomy in the first degree, section 566.062, RSMo 2000, and the class B felony of child molestation in the first degree, section 566.067, RSMo 2000. Since a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).