Case Name: Edward B. JONES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patricia R. STANSBERRY, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-01-23
Citations: 308 F. App'x 700
Docket Number: No, 08-7724
Parties: Edward B. JONES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patricia R. STANSBERRY, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 308
Pages: 700–701

Head Matter:
Edward B. JONES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patricia R. STANSBERRY, Respondent-Appellee.
No, 08-7724.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 15, 2009.
Decided: Jan. 23, 2009.
Edward B. Jones, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Edward B. Jones, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's orders construing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition as a 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2008) motion and dismissing it, and denying reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jones v. Stansberry, No. 1:08-cv-00713-JCC-TCB (E.D. Va. filed July 21, 2008; entered July 23, 2008 & Aug. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.