Case Name: In re Bryant
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1960-05-18
Citations: 171 Ohio St. 16
Docket Number: No. 36313
Parties: In re Bryant.
Judges: Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taft, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and Peck, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, New Service
Volume: 171
Pages: 16–17

Head Matter:
In re Bryant.
(No. 36313
Decided May 18, 1960.)
Mr. Claude Bryant, in propria persona.
Mr. Marie McElroy, attorney general, and Mr. Aubrey Wendt, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The trial court had jurisdiction of the subject matter and of the person of petitioner. Petitioner could have objected to alleged irregularities in the indictment before trial, had an adequate remedy by way of appeal from the judgment of conviction to review the other alleged errors or irregularities of which he here complains and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in habeas corpus.
Petitioner remanded to custody.
Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taft, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and Peck, JJ., concur.