Case Name: Sterling L. SINGLETON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Patricia BROWN, Lieutenant, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-03-15
Citations: 714 F. App'x 307
Docket Number: No. 17-6475
Parties: Sterling L. SINGLETON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Patricia BROWN, Lieutenant, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 714
Pages: 307–307

Head Matter:
Sterling L. SINGLETON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Patricia BROWN, Lieutenant, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 17-6475
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 13, 2018
Decided: March 15, 2018
Sterling L. Singleton, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Michael Balthazor, Roy F. Laney, RILEY, POPE & LANEY, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Sterling L. Singleton appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Singleton v. Brown, No. 9:15-cv-02723-JMC, 2017 WL 942177 (D. S.C., Mar. 10, 2017). We deny Singleton's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED