Case Name: Charles L. KOPETZKY, Sr., Rosemary Kopetzky, Suzanne Williams and David Kopetzky, Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. RAYTHEON AIRCRAFT COMPANY and Kreve Aviation, Inc., d/b/a Air Sprit Aviation, Defendants/Appellants; Raytheon Aircraft Company and Kreve Aviation, Inc., d/b/a Air Spirit Aviation, Defendant/Third Party Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. David P. Oetting, as Defendant Ad Litem for Thomas Hurster, Deceased, Third Party. Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-05-04
Citations: 989 S.W.2d 953
Docket Number: No. 74214
Parties: Charles L. KOPETZKY, Sr., Rosemary Kopetzky, Suzanne Williams and David Kopetzky, Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. RAYTHEON AIRCRAFT COMPANY and Kreve Aviation, Inc., d/b/a Air Sprit Aviation, Defendants/Appellants, Raytheon Aircraft Company and Kreve Aviation, Inc., d/b/a Air Spirit Aviation, Defendant/Third Party Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. David P. Oetting, as Defendant Ad Litem for Thomas Hurster, Deceased, Third Party. Defendant/Respondent,
Judges: Before JAMES A. PUDLOWSKI, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL Jr., and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 989
Pages: 953–954

Head Matter:
Charles L. KOPETZKY, Sr., Rosemary Kopetzky, Suzanne Williams and David Kopetzky, Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. RAYTHEON AIRCRAFT COMPANY and Kreve Aviation, Inc., d/b/a Air Sprit Aviation, Defendants/Appellants, Raytheon Aircraft Company and Kreve Aviation, Inc., d/b/a Air Spirit Aviation, Defendant/Third Party Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. David P. Oetting, as Defendant Ad Litem for Thomas Hurster, Deceased, Third Party. Defendant/Respondent,
No. 74214.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
May 4, 1999.
John S. Sandberg, St. Louis, for appellant.
Leo W. Nelson, Holtkamp, Liese, Beekem-eier & Childress, St. Louis, Paul Herbers, Cooling & Herbers, Kansas City, Paul E. Kovacs, John H. Quinn III, Thomas B. Weaver, Armstrong, Teasdale, Schlafly & Davis, St. Louis, for Respondents.
Before JAMES A. PUDLOWSKI, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL Jr., and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Raytheon Aircraft Company ("Raytheon") appeals from an order and judgment which imposed sanctions in the amount of $78,-121.39 for discovery violations. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).