Case Name: Steven W. LITTLEJOHN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN OF TYGER RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent-Appellee, and South Carolina Department of Corrections, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-12-26
Citations: 491 F. App'x 448
Docket Number: No. 12-7245
Parties: Steven W. LITTLEJOHN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN OF TYGER RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent-Appellee, and South Carolina Department of Corrections, Respondent.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 491
Pages: 448–449

Head Matter:
Steven W. LITTLEJOHN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN OF TYGER RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent-Appellee, and South Carolina Department of Corrections, Respondent.
No. 12-7245.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 4, 2012.
Decided: Dec. 26, 2012.
Steven W. Littlejohn, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, James Anthony Mabry, Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Steven W. Littlejohn seeks to appeal the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appeal-able unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certifícate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.
We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Littlejohn has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certifícate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauper-is, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.