Case Name: Nadejda MAKAROWSKI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mary Christina MORRISON; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-09-15
Citations: 292 F. App'x 709
Docket Number: No. 08-55848
Parties: Nadejda MAKAROWSKI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mary Christina MORRISON; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 292
Pages: 709–710

Head Matter:
Nadejda MAKAROWSKI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mary Christina MORRISON; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 08-55848.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 8, 2008.
Filed Sept. 15, 2008.
Nadejda Makarowski, Stanton, CA, pro se.
Before: PREGERSON, McKEOWN and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
A review of the record, appellant's opening brief, and appellant's response to the order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's May 20, 2008 order dismissing this case for lack of jurisdiction.
All other pending motions are denied.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provid ed by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.