Case Name: CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG, Appellant, v. Elmer Daniel PATTERSON, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2004-09-10
Citations: 884 So. 2d 380
Docket Number: No. 2D04-47
Parties: CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG, Appellant, v. Elmer Daniel PATTERSON, Appellee.
Judges: FULMER, DAVIS, and KELLY, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 884
Pages: 380–380

Head Matter:
CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG, Appellant, v. Elmer Daniel PATTERSON, Appellee.
No. 2D04-47.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Sept. 10, 2004.
John C. Wolfe, City Attorney, and Ernest Mueller and Thomas Bustin, Assistant City Attorneys, St. Petersburg, for Appellant.
Jennifer J. Card and Scot E. Samis of Abbey, Adams, Byelick, Kiernan, Mueller & Lancaster, L.L.P., St. Petersburg; and Diane Bailey of Law Offices of Diane Bailey, P.A., St. Petersburg, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this appeal, the City of St. Peters-burg challenges an order of the circuit court granting mandamus relief. We affirm and direct the Civil Service Board of the City of St. Petersburg to convene and consider Petitioner Patterson's motion for attorney's fees and costs.
Affirmed.
FULMER, DAVIS, and KELLY, JJ., Concur.