Case Name: MERCURY CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant, v. Clara FLORES, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2003-12-17
Citations: 870 So. 2d 127
Docket Number: No. 3D03-453
Parties: MERCURY CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant, v. Clara FLORES, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., LEVY and SHEVIN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 870
Pages: 127–128

Head Matter:
MERCURY CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant, v. Clara FLORES, Appellee.
No. 3D03-453.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 17, 2003.
Rehearing Denied April 16, 2004.
Cooney, Mattson, Lance, Blackburn, Richards & O’Connor and Warren B. Kwavnick, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
Lopez & Best and Virginia M. Best, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., LEVY and SHEVIN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the judgment finding that the alleged error, if any, in the admission of the evidence was entirely harmless. See Soler v. Kukula, 297 So.2d 600, 602 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); Hall v. Haldane, 268 So.2d 403, 404-05 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972).