Case Name: FRANCIS B. McMENAMIN AND ROSE M. McMENAMIN, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. EVESHAM MUNICIPAL UTILITIES AUTHORITY, A PUBLIC BODY CORPORATE AND POLITIC UNDER N. J. S. A. 14B-4, 5 AND 6, IN THE TOWNSHIP OF EVESHAM, BURLINGTON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1969-09-23
Citations: 107 N.J. Super. 42
Docket Number: 
Parties: FRANCIS B. McMENAMIN AND ROSE M. McMENAMIN, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. EVESHAM MUNICIPAL UTILITIES AUTHORITY, A PUBLIC BODY CORPORATE AND POLITIC UNDER N. J. S. A. 14B-4, 5 AND 6, IN THE TOWNSHIP OF EVESHAM, BURLINGTON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 107
Pages: 42–42

Head Matter:
FRANCIS B. McMENAMIN AND ROSE M. McMENAMIN, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. EVESHAM MUNICIPAL UTILITIES AUTHORITY, A PUBLIC BODY CORPORATE AND POLITIC UNDER N. J. S. A. 14B-4, 5 AND 6, IN THE TOWNSHIP OF EVESHAM, BURLINGTON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued September 8, 1969
Decided September 23, 1969.
Before Judges Sullivan, Carton and Halrern.
Mr. William B. Colsey III argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Powell and Davis, attorneys).
Mr. Joseph S. Georgiana argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Capehart and Scatchard, attorneys).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment herein is affirmed for the reasons stated by Judge Wick in the Chancery Division, 104 N. J. Super. 161 (1969).