Case Name: Salame M. AMR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY; Eddie N. Moore, Jr.; Nasser Rashidi; Larry C. Brown; Keith M. Williamson, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-11-16
Citations: 352 F. App'x 845
Docket Number: No. 09-1657
Parties: Salame M. AMR, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY; Eddie N. Moore, Jr.; Nasser Rashidi; Larry C. Brown; Keith M. Williamson, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 352
Pages: 845–846

Head Matter:
Salame M. AMR, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY; Eddie N. Moore, Jr.; Nasser Rashidi; Larry C. Brown; Keith M. Williamson, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 09-1657.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 28, 2009.
Decided: Nov. 16, 2009.
Salame M. Ami*, Appellant Pro Se. Gregory Clayton Fleming, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Salame M. Amr seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion to supplement the record for the appeal to this court of his underlying civil case. Because our decision in that appeal has issued, Amr v. Virginia State Univ., 331 Fed.Appx. 194 (4th Cir.2009) (unpublished), this appeal is now moot. See Incumaa v. Ozmint, 507 F.3d 281, 286 (4th Cir.2007) (setting forth the principles of appellate mootness). Therefore, we dismiss Amr's appeal as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.