Case Name: Stacey E. Kruize, Respondent, v. Christopher Kruize, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1989-11-13
Citations: 155 A.D.2d 517
Docket Number: 
Parties: Stacey E. Kruize, Respondent, v Christopher Kruize, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 155
Pages: 517–517

Head Matter:
Stacey E. Kruize, Respondent, v Christopher Kruize, Appellant.

Opinion:
— In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Delaney, J.), entered November 29, 1988, which denied his motion to compel the plaintiff wife to answer certain questions propounded at an examination before trial.
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs (see, Roberts v Módica, 102 AD2d 886; Hughson v St. Francis Hosp., 93 AD2d 491). Brown, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.