Case Name: In the Matter of Albert M. Rosenblatt, as District Attorney of Dutchess County, Respondent, v. Joseph Jiudice, as Judge of the County Court of Dutchess County, Respondent. William Abruzzi, Proposed Intervenor, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1975-02-14
Citations: 36 N.Y.2d 683
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Albert M. Rosenblatt, as District Attorney of Dutchess County, Respondent, v. Joseph Jiudice, as Judge of the County Court of Dutchess County, Respondent. William Abruzzi, Proposed Intervenor, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 36
Pages: 683–684

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Albert M. Rosenblatt, as District Attorney of Dutchess County, Respondent, v. Joseph Jiudice, as Judge of the County Court of Dutchess County, Respondent. William Abruzzi, Proposed Intervenor, Appellant.
Submitted February 10, 1975;
decided February 14, 1975.
Albert M. Rosenblatt, District Attorney, for motion.
Robert G. Morvillo opposed.

Opinion:
Motion granted and appeal dismissed, without costs. With' respect to the judgment,-denominated" an order, dismissing the proceeding, appellant is not an aggrieved party within the meaning of CPLB 5511; and no appeal lies from a " decision " or " opinion " as distingüished from the judgment-order in the proceeding (see CPLB 5512, subd. [a] ; People ex rel. Degbrina v. Fay, 13 N Y 2d 901,902).