Case Name: Phillip D. MARTIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2015-06-30
Citations: 464 S.W.3d 280
Docket Number: WD 77516
Parties: Phillip D. MARTIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before'Division One: James Edward Welsh, P.J., Thomas H. Newton, and Karen King Mitchell, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 464
Pages: 280–281

Head Matter:
Phillip D. MARTIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
WD 77516
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
ORDER FILED: June 30, 2015
Susan Hogan, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Appellant
Rachel Flaster, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent
Before'Division One: James Edward Welsh, P.J., Thomas H. Newton, and Karen King Mitchell, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
Per Curiam:
Mr. Phillip D. Martin appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief motion. He claims' that he was forced to plead guilty to the charged offenses because defense counsel failed to prepare for trial.
For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).