Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Deleon MORGAN, Defendant/Appellant; Deleon MORGAN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1996-09-10
Citations: 928 S.W.2d 406
Docket Number: Nos. 66643, 69219
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Deleon MORGAN, Defendant/Appellant. Deleon MORGAN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before DOWD and REINHARD, P.JJ., and GARY M. GAERTNER, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 928
Pages: 406–407

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Deleon MORGAN, Defendant/Appellant. Deleon MORGAN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Nos. 66643, 69219.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Sept. 10, 1996.
Raymond J. Capelovitch, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Che-lyl A. Caponegro, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before DOWD and REINHARD, P.JJ., and GARY M. GAERTNER, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant appeals the denial, without an evi-dentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.
We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).