Case Name: Schreckengost, Appellant, v. Montgomery, Appellee
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1964-04-29
Citations: 176 Ohio St. 165
Docket Number: No. 38427
Parties: Schreckengost, Appellant, v. Montgomery, Appellee.
Judges: Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Kovachy, O’Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, New Service
Volume: 176
Pages: 165–166

Head Matter:
Schreckengost, Appellant, v. Montgomery, Appellee.
(No. 38427
Decided April 29, 1964.)
Messrs. Kelley & Schneider man, for appellant.
Messrs. Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs and Mr. Charles E. Pierson, for appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The two-issue rule is not applicable. There is but one cause of action, and it is based on the claimed negligence of defendant resulting in a single loss and damage. Separate specifications of negligence provide no basis for the application of the two-issue rule. Claypool v. Mohawk Motor, Inc., 155 Ohio St., 8.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Kovachy, O'Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur.
Kovachy, J., of the Eighth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Matthias, J.