Case Name: Timothy FERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-02-15
Citations: 156 S.W.3d 439
Docket Number: No. ED 84492
Parties: Timothy FERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and MARY K. HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 156
Pages: 439–439

Head Matter:
Timothy FERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 84492.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Feb. 15, 2005.
Gwenda R. Robinson, District Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Evan J. Buchheim, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and MARY K. HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Timothy Fernandez appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing.
Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).