Case Name: Antonia SANGSTER, Individually, Erika Sangster, a Minor, by Her Next Friend Antonia Sangster, and Amanda Sangster, a Minor by Her Next Friend Antonia Sangster, Appellants, v. SHOP 'N SAVE WAREHOUSE FOODS, INC., Koman Properties, Inc., and Mayfair Acquisitions, LLC, Respondents.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2018-04-24
Citations: 545 S.W.3d 385
Docket Number: No. ED 105473
Parties: Antonia SANGSTER, Individually, Erika Sangster, a Minor, by Her Next Friend Antonia Sangster, and Amanda Sangster, a Minor by Her Next Friend Antonia Sangster, Appellants,
v.
SHOP 'N SAVE WAREHOUSE FOODS, INC., Koman Properties, Inc., and Mayfair Acquisitions, LLC, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 545
Pages: 385–385

Head Matter:
Antonia SANGSTER, Individually, Erika Sangster, a Minor, by Her Next Friend Antonia Sangster, and Amanda Sangster, a Minor by Her Next Friend Antonia Sangster, Appellants,
v.
SHOP 'N SAVE WAREHOUSE FOODS, INC., Koman Properties, Inc., and Mayfair Acquisitions, LLC, Respondents.
No. ED 105473
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Filed: April 24, 2018
FOR APPELLANT: Kim C. Freter, 225 S. Meramec, Suite 1100, Clayton, MO 63105, Amanda Murphy, Nolan D. Drafahl, 8182 Maryland Ave., Suite 801, St. Louis, MO 63105.
FOR RESPONDENT: David P. Bub, Tyler J. Finnegan, 800 market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.
Before Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., Angela T. Quigless, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Antonia Sangster, Erika Sangster, and Amanda Sangster (collectively "Plaintiffs") appeal the judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of Shop 'N Save Warehouse Foods, Inc., Koman Properties, Inc., and Mayfair Acquisitions, LLC (collectively "Defendants") on Plaintiffs' claims for wrongful death and negligence arising out of a fall that occurred on Defendants' property. We find no error has occurred.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).