Case Name: BURGOON v. COM. MUT. INS. CO.
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1927-02-08
Citations: 5 Ohio Law Abs. 172
Docket Number: No. 20312
Parties: BURGOON v. COM. MUT. INS. CO.
Judges: 
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 5
Pages: 172–172

Head Matter:
BURGOON v. COM. MUT. INS. CO.
No. 20312.
Supreme Court
Dock. Feb. 8, 1927,
5 Abs. 105.
Attorneys — Cable & Cable, Lima, for Bur-goon; Bailare, Jones & Price, Columbus, and Lippincott & Lippincott, Lima, for Company.

Opinion:
Burgoon contends in the Supreme Court that when depositions are taken by both plaintiff and defendant's agent, and defendant does not file his deposition until day of hearing; Burgoon;" after reading his,, has the right to be sustained in an objection to reading of cross examination of the agent as shown by Insurance Company's deposition.
Note — Motion to certify overruled, 5 Abs. 155.