Case Name: Nathan Leonard v. Gideon Sunderlin
Court: New York Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1805-08
Citations: 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 480
Docket Number: 
Parties: Nathan Leonard v. Gideon Sunderlin.
Judges: 
Reporter: Coleman & Caines' Cases
Volume: 1
Pages: 480–480

Head Matter:
Nathan Leonard v. Gideon Sunderlin.
SHEPHARD moved for leave to permit a justice to amend a return on an affidavit, stating that it was made out by one of the attornies in the suit, and on examination he finds it “ incorrect in point of fact, c< and defective as it existed before him.”

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The affidavit is insufficient. It should have specified the points in which it was intended to amend, that we might see whether the errors now existing, were material.