Case Name: In re Syed Aftab KAZMI, Debtor. Syed Aftab Kazmi, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JPMorgan Chase; Wells Fargo, Defendants-Appellees, and Green Point Mortgage Funding, Inc.; Deutsche Bank; Bank of America; Barclays Bank, PLC; Barclays Capital Real Estate, Inc.; Lender Processing Services, Inc.; LPS Default Solutions, Inc.; Docx LLC; Does 1 Thru 50, et al.; GSR Trust 2005-Hel-1, Defendants, and Janet M. Meiburger, Trustee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-10-24
Citations: 585 F. App'x 102
Docket Number: No. 14-1526
Parties: In re Syed Aftab KAZMI, Debtor. Syed Aftab Kazmi, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JPMorgan Chase; Wells Fargo, Defendants-Appellees, and Green Point Mortgage Funding, Inc.; Deutsche Bank; Bank of America; Barclays Bank, PLC; Barclays Capital Real Estate, Inc.; Lender Processing Services, Inc.; LPS Default Solutions, Inc.; Docx LLC; Does 1 Thru 50, et al.; GSR Trust 2005-Hel-1, Defendants, and Janet M. Meiburger, Trustee.
Judges: Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 585
Pages: 102–103

Head Matter:
In re Syed Aftab KAZMI, Debtor. Syed Aftab Kazmi, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JPMorgan Chase; Wells Fargo, Defendants-Appellees, and Green Point Mortgage Funding, Inc.; Deutsche Bank; Bank of America; Barclays Bank, PLC; Barclays Capital Real Estate, Inc.; Lender Processing Services, Inc.; LPS Default Solutions, Inc.; Docx LLC; Does 1 Thru 50, et al.; GSR Trust 2005-Hel-1, Defendants, and Janet M. Meiburger, Trustee.
No. 14-1526.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 20, 2014.
Decided: Oct. 24, 2014.
Syed Aftab Kazmi, Appellant Pro Se. Jason Cameron Hicks, Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, PLLC, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Syed Aftab Kazmi appeals the district court's order affirming the bankruptcy court's orders granting summary judgment in favor of Wells Fargo and JPMorgan Chase. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the courts below. Kazmi v. JPMorgan Chase, Nos. 1:14-cv-00024-CMH-TR J; 13-10897-BFK; 13-01087-BFK (E.D. Va. filed May 19, 2014, entered May 20, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.