Case Name: Solomon Greenwald, Respondent, v. The State Bank, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1925-06-04
Citations: 125 Misc. 260
Docket Number: 
Parties: Solomon Greenwald, Respondent, v. The State Bank, Appellant
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 125
Pages: 260–261

Head Matter:
Solomon Greenwald, Respondent, v. The State Bank, Appellant
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
June 4, 1925.
William F. Cogswell, for the appellant.
Reuben Dorfman, for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
The controversy involved in the present appeal was before the November, 1924, term of this court (124 Misc. 176) in connection with a motion granting the defendant the right to interplead a third party, who was the payee of a check drawn by plaintiff upon defendant. The per curiam opinion in that case practically disposes of the contentions of appellant on the present appeal.
It may be useful to add that although not specifically referred to in our previous opinion, the appellant now calls attention to the fact that the check involved was certified at the instance of the plaintiff. The opinion in one of the cases cited by appellant, namely, Olsen v. Bankers Trust Co. (205 App. Div. 669), points out (at p. 670) that the plaintiff's right against the defendant here to have his funds in the check remain unaffected by the fact of such certification.
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
All concur; present, Bijur, McGoldrick and Levy, JJ.