Case Name: M. J. Terranova and Josephine Terranova, his wife, and Royal Indemnity Company, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Hugo Stearns, Adm. of the estate of Herman Althof and Elizabeth Althof, deceased, Defendants in Error
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1932-05-18
Citations: 108 Fla. 21
Docket Number: 
Parties: M. J. Terranova and Josephine Terranova, his wife, and Royal Indemnity Company, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Hugo Stearns, Adm. of the estate of Herman Althof and Elizabeth Althof, deceased, Defendants in Error.
Judges: 
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 108
Pages: 21–23

Head Matter:
M. J. Terranova and Josephine Terranova, his wife, and Royal Indemnity Company, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Hugo Stearns, Adm. of the estate of Herman Althof and Elizabeth Althof, deceased, Defendants in Error.
141 So. 597
145 So. 256
Division B.
Decision filed May 18, 1932.
Opinion Rehearing filed January 11, 1933.
Walter G. Ramseur and J. Carl Lambdin and B. K. Roberts, for Plaintiffs in Error;
Chas. J. Maurer, Wm. G. King and J. Frank Houghton, for Defendant in Error.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises,, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed.