Case Name: JONATHAN D. MILLER v. CORNELIUS V. TRAPHAGAN
Court: New Jersey Court of Chancery
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1847-06
Citations: 6 N.J. Eq. 200
Docket Number: 
Parties: JONATHAN D. MILLER v. CORNELIUS V. TRAPHAGAN.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 6
Pages: 200–200

Head Matter:
JONATHAN D. MILLER v. CORNELIUS V. TRAPHAGAN.
1. A notice of a motion to dissolve an injunction “ for irregularity in the proceedings,” is insufficient.
2. The notice should state the irregularity.
Motion to dissolve an injunction. The notice given is that an application would be made to the Chancellor, on the 10th day of July, 1847, at 10 A. M., at his chambers at Newark, to dissolve the injunction granted in the cause, “ for irregularity in the proceedings.”
Walter Rutherford, for the motion.
Oliver S. Hoisted, Jr., and A. Whitehead objected that the notice was insufficient.

Opinion:
The Chancellor.
A notice to dissolve an injunction " for irregularity in the proceedings," is insufficient.
The irregularity complained of should be stated in the notice, 2 Green's Ch. 9.