Case Name: In re Michael HARDY, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-03-08
Citations: 637 F. App'x 105
Docket Number: No. 15-1584
Parties: In re Michael HARDY, Petitioner.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 637
Pages: 105–105

Head Matter:
In re Michael HARDY, Petitioner.
No. 15-1584.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 29, 2016.
Decided: March 8, 2016.
Michael Hardy, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael Hardy petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. In light of the district court's recent action directing an evidentiary hearing on Hardy's § 2255 motion, we find no undue delay. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.