Case Name: In the Interest of: B.S., Respondent. C.S. (Mother), Appellant; S.A.S. (Father), Defendant, v. Juvenile Officer, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2007-02-20
Citations: 214 S.W.3d 389
Docket Number: No. WD 67145
Parties: In the Interest of: B.S., Respondent. C.S. (Mother), Appellant; S.A.S. (Father), Defendant, v. Juvenile Officer, Respondent.
Judges: Before JAMES M. SMART, JR., P.J., JOSEPH M. ELLIS, and EDWIN H. SMITH, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 214
Pages: 389–390

Head Matter:
In the Interest of: B.S., Respondent. C.S. (Mother), Appellant; S.A.S. (Father), Defendant, v. Juvenile Officer, Respondent.
No. WD 67145.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Feb. 20, 2007.
Deborah Susan Johnson, Kansas City, MO for Appellant.
Daniel George Barry, Kansas City, MO, for Respondent Juvenile Officer.
Anastacia Renae Adamson, Kansas City, MO, Attorney and Guardian for child.
Before JAMES M. SMART, JR., P.J., JOSEPH M. ELLIS, and EDWIN H. SMITH, JJ.

Opinion:
Order
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a juvenile court judgment assuming jurisdiction over a minor child after finding that the child was in need of care and treatment. The child's mother appeals. Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publi cation of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).