Case Name: CASS PLUMBING & HEATING COMPANY, INC.; Louis A. Troiani, Jr., Julius B. Troiani and Reynold D. Troiani, Individually and trading as Troiani Parking; William Jacobowitz and Rifkie Jacobowitz, husband and wife, and William Jacobowitz, Individually and trading as Federal Paint & Hardware Company; Susanna K. Ferris, Louise A. Kirner and Clara Kirner, Individually and trading as Frank H. Kirner; Edwin M. Ginsburg; and Market Rug Company, Petitioners, v. PPG INDUSTRIES, INC.; Urban Redevelopment Authority of Pittsburgh; and City of Pittsburgh
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1980-04-24
Citations: 488 Pa. 564
Docket Number: Petition No. 102 W.D.Misc.Dkt. 1980
Parties: CASS PLUMBING & HEATING COMPANY, INC.; Louis A. Troiani, Jr., Julius B. Troiani and Reynold D. Troiani, Individually and trading as Troiani Parking; William Jacobowitz and Rifkie Jacobowitz, husband and wife, and William Jacobowitz, Individually and trading as Federal Paint & Hardware Company; Susanna K. Ferris, Louise A. Kirner and Clara Kirner, Individually and trading as Frank H. Kirner; Edwin M. Ginsburg; and Market Rug Company, Petitioners, v. PPG INDUSTRIES, INC.; Urban Redevelopment Authority of Pittsburgh; and City of Pittsburgh.
Judges: Before EAGEN, C. J., and O’BRIEN, ROBERTS, NIX, LARSEN, FLAHERTY and KAUFFMAN, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 488
Pages: 564–566

Head Matter:
412 A.2d 1376
CASS PLUMBING & HEATING COMPANY, INC.; Louis A. Troiani, Jr., Julius B. Troiani and Reynold D. Troiani, Individually and trading as Troiani Parking; William Jacobowitz and Rifkie Jacobowitz, husband and wife, and William Jacobowitz, Individually and trading as Federal Paint & Hardware Company; Susanna K. Ferris, Louise A. Kirner and Clara Kirner, Individually and trading as Frank H. Kirner; Edwin M. Ginsburg; and Market Rug Company, Petitioners, v. PPG INDUSTRIES, INC.; Urban Redevelopment Authority of Pittsburgh; and City of Pittsburgh.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued April 18, 1980.
Decided April 24, 1980.
Thomas J. Dempsey, Pittsburgh, for petitioners.
George R. Specter, Philip Baskin, John O. Wicks, Dante Pellegrini, Asst. City Sol.,' Pittsburgh, for respondents.
Before EAGEN, C. J., and O’BRIEN, ROBERTS, NIX, LARSEN, FLAHERTY and KAUFFMAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
This controversy has not yet reached the stage where the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania should intervene. Hence, the Petition for Extraordinary Relief is denied.
The Application to Review the Order entered by Mr. Justice Larsen on April 11,1980, is granted and that Order is vacated.
ROBERTS, J., filed a statement.
LARSEN, J., filed a dissenting statement.
FLAHERTY, J., filed a dissenting statement.
ROBERTS, Justice.
It is with the understanding that the issues petitioners present to this Court will be entertained in the Commonwealth Court on the appeals pending there that I agree to this Court's abstention from the exercise of its extraordinary jurisdiction. See Price v. Philadelphia Parking Authority, 422 Pa. 317, 221 A.2d 138 (1966); Crawford v. Redevelopment Authority, 418 Pa. 549, 211 A.2d 866 (1965).