Case Name: FREDERICK RICHARDS, INC., Appellant, v. PORT CITY GLASS & MIRROR, INC., Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jurisdiction: South Carolina
Decision Date: 1980-04-29
Citations: 274 S.C. 558
Docket Number: 21209
Parties: FREDERICK RICHARDS, INC., Appellant, v. PORT CITY GLASS & MIRROR, INC., Respondent.
Judges: Littlejohn, Ness, Gregory and Harwell, JJ., concur.
Reporter: South Carolina Reports
Volume: 274
Pages: 558–559

Head Matter:
21209
FREDERICK RICHARDS, INC., Appellant, v. PORT CITY GLASS & MIRROR, INC., Respondent.
(266 S. E. (2d) 67)
S. Thomas Worley, Jr., of Bradley & Worley, Mount Pleasant, for appellant.
J. Rutledge Young, Jr., of Young, Clement & Rivers, Charleston, for respondent.
April 29, 1980.

Opinion:
Lewis, Chief Justice:
The trial judge directed a verdict in favor of the defendant-respondent and this appeal ensued. We dismiss.
The appellant has abandoned two of his assignments of error, thus leaving only the following exception as the basis of appeal:
That the trial judge committed error in directing a verdict in favor of defendant-respondent.
Even a cursory reading of the exception reveals its lack of compliance with Supreme Court Rule 4, Section 6. Since the exception is too general and does not present the points of law or fact the appellant wishes this Court to review, we must apply the aforementioned rule to prevent the vice it envisions. Were we to hold otherwise, this Court would be required to review all of the evidence and retry the whole case. Williams v. Regula, 266 S. C. 228, 222 S. E. (2d) 7 (1976).
Despite this insufficiency, we have reviewed the record and determined the appeal to be without merit.
Appeal dismissed.
Littlejohn, Ness, Gregory and Harwell, JJ., concur.