Case Name: In the Matter of the Claim of Elmo Prinz, Respondent, v. Harold Fey, Jr., Doing Business as Harold Fey, Jr., Landscaping Service, et al., Appellants. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1963-02-21
Citations: 12 N.Y.2d 986
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Claim of Elmo Prinz, Respondent, v. Harold Fey, Jr., Doing Business as Harold Fey, Jr., Landscaping Service, et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 12
Pages: 986–987

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Claim of Elmo Prinz, Respondent, v. Harold Fey, Jr., Doing Business as Harold Fey, Jr., Landscaping Service, et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.
Argued January 21, 1963;
decided February 21, 1963.
John H. Roberts and William P. Hastorf for appellants.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Harry Rackow, Paxton Rlair and Roy Wiedersum of counsel), for Workmen’s Compensation Board, respondent.
No appearance for claimant-respondent.

Opinion:
Order affirmed, with costs to the Workmen's Compensation Board; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Foster and Scileppi.