Case Name: Wilhelmina Friedman, as Administratrix, etc., Appellant, v. The Dry Dock, East Broadway and Battery Railroad Company, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1888-10-26
Citations: 110 N.Y. 676
Docket Number: 
Parties: Wilhelmina Friedman, as Administratrix, etc., Appellant, v. The Dry Dock, East Broadway and Battery Railroad Company, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 110
Pages: 676–676

Head Matter:
Wilhelmina Friedman, as Administratrix, etc., Appellant, v. The Dry Dock, East Broadway and Battery Railroad Company, Respondent.
(Argued October 9, 1888;
decided October 26, 1888.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Court of Common Pleas in and for the city and county of New York, entered upon an order made December 6, 1886, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendant, and entered upon an order nonsuiting the plaintiff on trial.
Robert Sewell for appellant.
John M. Scribner for respondent.

Opinion:
Agree to reverse judgment and for new trial on opinion of Van Hoesen, J., in court below.
All concur, except Earl and Gray, JJ., dissenting.
Judgment reversed.