Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher J. COOPER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-09-06
Citations: 440 F. App'x 708
Docket Number: No. 11-10384
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher J. COOPER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before TJOFLAT, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 440
Pages: 708–709

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher J. COOPER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-10384
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Sept. 6, 2011.
R. Brian Tanner, James D. Durham, Brian T. Rafferty, James Christian Stuc-hell, Edward J. Tarver, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Savannah, GA, Andrew M. Kramer, Jones Day, Washington, D.C., for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Robert Nason Nye, III, Nye & Siamos, PC, Savannah, GA, for Defendantr-Appel-lant.
Before TJOFLAT, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Robert N. Nye, III, appointed counsel for Christopher J. Cooper in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Cooper's conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.