Case Name: Donell J. BLOUNT, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Willie NEECE, Correctional Officer; Vitatoe, Correctional Officer; Sergeant J. Lambert, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-01-08
Citations: 503 F. App'x 244
Docket Number: No. 12-7420
Parties: Donell J. BLOUNT, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Willie NEECE, Correctional Officer; Vitatoe, Correctional Officer; Sergeant J. Lambert, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before AGEE, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 503
Pages: 244–245

Head Matter:
Donell J. BLOUNT, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Willie NEECE, Correctional Officer; Vitatoe, Correctional Officer; Sergeant J. Lambert, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 12-7420.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 26, 2012.
Decided Jan. 8, 2013.
Donell J. Blount, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Christopher Davies Su-pino, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appel-lees.
Before AGEE, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Donell J. Blount, Sr., appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to the defendants on his claim of violations of the Eighth Amendment, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Blount v. Neece, No. 7:11-cv-00362-GEC-RSB, 2012 WL 3562772 (W.D.Va. Aug. 17, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.