Case Name: SAMUEL NUSSBAUM, COMPLAINANT-RESPONDENT, v. JOSEPH HETZER AND MARY HETZER, HIS WIFE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1948-10-04
Citations: 1 N.J. 25
Docket Number: 
Parties: SAMUEL NUSSBAUM, COMPLAINANT-RESPONDENT, v. JOSEPH HETZER AND MARY HETZER, HIS WIFE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 1
Pages: 25–30

Head Matter:
SAMUEL NUSSBAUM, COMPLAINANT-RESPONDENT, v. JOSEPH HETZER AND MARY HETZER, HIS WIFE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Argued September 20, 1948
Decided October 4, 1948.
Mr. Albert S. Gross argued the cause for defendants-appellants.
Mr. Jack Rinsler argued the cause for-complainant-respond-dent (Mr. Aubrey J. Elias on the brief).

Opinion:
Per Curtam.
The decree appealed from is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice Chancellor Grimshaw.
For affirmance: Chief Justice Vanderbilt and Justices Case, Heher, Waoheneeld and Burling—5.
For reversal: None.