Case Name: GEORGE W. CRANE, RESPONDENT, v. DANIEL REUTSCHLER, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1916-11-20
Citations: 89 N.J.L. 710
Docket Number: 
Parties: GEORGE W. CRANE, RESPONDENT, v. DANIEL REUTSCHLER, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 89
Pages: 710–710

Head Matter:
GEORGE W. CRANE, RESPONDENT, v. DANIEL REUTSCHLER, APPELLANT.
Submitted July 10, 1916
Decided November 20, 1916.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 88 N. J. L. 560.
For the respondent, Abraham Levitan.
For the appellant, Harry T. Davimos.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Minturn in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Black, White, HepPENHEIMBR, WILLIAMS, TAYLOR, GARDNER, JJ. 12.
For reversal—None.