Case Name: NATIONAL LIFE & ACCIDENT INS. CO. v. LANGSTON
Court: Texas Courts of Civil Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1931-10-21
Citations: 42 S.W.2d 1037
Docket Number: No. 8653
Parties: NATIONAL LIFE & ACCIDENT INS. CO. v. LANGSTON.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 42
Pages: 1037–1037

Head Matter:
NATIONAL LIFE & ACCIDENT INS. CO. v. LANGSTON.
No. 8653.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.
Oct. 21, 1931.
Rehearing Denied Nov. 4, 1931.
G. Woodson Morris, of San Antonio, for appellant.
Charles J.’ Lieek and Grover C. Morris, both of San Antonio, for appellee.

Opinion:
FLY, C. J.
This is a suit instituted by appellee for $268 penalty and attorney's fees, on a policy on the life of Judge W. Langston, her deceased husband. The verdict and judgment was for $268 and $50 attorney's fees.
The defense presented was that deceased had made false answers and representations as to his health at the time and prior to the issuance of the policy. In response to special issues, the jury found that deceased was iH sound health on the date the policy was issued, that the answers as to his health were not material to the risk, that*the answer of deceased as to whether he had ever had certain named diseases was not untrue. The jury answered that none of the representations made by deceased in his application for insurance .were untrue, and that such representations did hot induce the issuance of the policy.
Not one of the findings of the jury was sustained by the'facts in the case, but, on the other hand, every one of them was-disproved by the evidence. The man had undoubtedly given untrue answers .to the questions to which he responded in his application for insurance. He had been a sick map .long before he applied for the policy, and had also received injuries in,an accident, before the application was made for insurance, and, however much we may be adverse to reversing a judgment on the facts, we cannot in justice and reason permit the verdict and judgment to stand in this case.
Because the answers of the jury are not sustained by, but are in contravention of, the facts, the judgment will be reversed, and judgment here rendered that appellee take nothing by her suit, and pay all costs.