Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Aurelio RODRIGUEZ-OLGUIN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-04-19
Citations: 177 F. App'x 491
Docket Number: No. 05-2775
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Aurelio RODRIGUEZ-OLGUIN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before Hon. RICHARD A. POSNER, Hon. FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, and Hon. DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 177
Pages: 491–492

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Aurelio RODRIGUEZ-OLGUIN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-2775.
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Submitted April 14, 2006.
Decided April 19, 2006.
Scott Drury, Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Imani Chiphe, Office of the Federal Defender Program, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before Hon. RICHARD A. POSNER, Hon. FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, and Hon. DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Order
The principal issue presented by this appeal has been resolved recently by United States v. Martinez-Martinez, 442 F.3d 539 (7th Cir.2006), and United States v. Galicia-Cardenas, 443 F.3d 553 (7th Cir.2006). Although Rodriguez-Olguin contends that the district judge did not discuss adequately the question whether fast-track programs in other districts produce unacceptable disparity in sentencing, and therefore failed to consider the factors specified by 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), there is no need to give either weight or extended treatment to a consideration that, we held in Martinez-Martinez and Galicia-Cardenas, does not justify a reduced sentence. The district court adequately considered those factors that matter to the sentence. See United States v. Mykytiuk, 415 F.3d 606 (7th Cir.2005); United States v. Dean, 414 F.3d 725 (7th Cir.2005). The judgment therefore is affirmed.