Case Name: Joe David BARNARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GREENVILLE FAMILY COURT; Amy C. Sutherland, Chief Administrative Judge, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-05-06
Citations: 96 F. App'x 874
Docket Number: No. 04-6384
Parties: Joe David BARNARD, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. GREENVILLE FAMILY COURT; Amy C. Sutherland, Chief Administrative Judge, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 96
Pages: 874–875

Head Matter:
Joe David BARNARD, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. GREENVILLE FAMILY COURT; Amy C. Sutherland, Chief Administrative Judge, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 04-6384.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 29, 2004.
Decided May 6, 2004.
Joe David Barnard, Appellant pro se.
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Joe David Barnard appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Barnard v. Greenville Family Court, No. CA-03-3427-8-20BI (D.S.C. Nov. 26, 2003). We deny Barnard's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED