Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darryl James McGLAMRY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-02-21
Citations: 217 F. App'x 232
Docket Number: No. 06-6601
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darryl James McGLAMRY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 217
Pages: 232–232

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darryl James McGLAMRY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-6601.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 15, 2007.
Decided: Feb. 21, 2007.
Darryl James McGlamry, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller, Office of the United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Darryl James McGlamry seeks to appeal the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his motion filed under former Fed.R.Crim.P. 35. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. McGlamry, Nos. 2:88-cr-00136-UA; 1:05-cv-00881-FWB (M.D.N.C. filed Mar. 16, 2006 & entered Mar. 17, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.