Case Name: Kenneth W. SCHRAW, et al., Appellants, v. ESTATE OF Robert J. HESTER, III, et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-02-04
Citations: 751 So. 2d 165
Docket Number: No. 5D99-969
Parties: Kenneth W. SCHRAW, et al., Appellants, v. ESTATE OF Robert J. HESTER, III, et al., Appellees.
Judges: HARRIS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 751
Pages: 165–166

Head Matter:
Kenneth W. SCHRAW, et al., Appellants, v. ESTATE OF Robert J. HESTER, III, et al., Appellees.
No. 5D99-969.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Feb. 4, 2000.
Carla L. Brown Harward of Law Offices of Carla L. Brown, West Palm Beach, for Appellants.
Richard M. Carnell, Jr., Ft. Pierce, for Appellees.

Opinion:
DAUKSCH, J.
This is an appeal from a summary final judgment in a promissory note case. Because there is a genuine issue of material fact, the delivery of the note to the payee, a trial must be conducted to resolve the issue. See McClure v. Montgomery, 556 So.2d 759 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Thomson v. Parrish, 221 So.2d 770 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969); Evans v. United Ben. Fire Ins. Co. of Omaha, Neb., 192 So.2d 87 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966). See also First Nat. Entertainment Corp. v. Brumlik, 531 So.2d 403 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
HARRIS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.