Case Name: Christopher R. ROBERTS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2013-03-19
Citations: 393 S.W.3d 668
Docket Number: No. ED 98295
Parties: Christopher R. ROBERTS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J. and GLENN A. NORTON, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 393
Pages: 668–669

Head Matter:
Christopher R. ROBERTS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 98295.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
March 19, 2013.
Lisa M. Stroup, Saint Louis, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Richard A. Starnes, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J. and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Christopher R. Roberts appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evi-dentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).