Case Name: Darris D. TEEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF GREENVILLE (NC) POLICE DEPARTMENT; Officer Weaver; K. Woodford; Laughinghouse; R. Wright; Bill Little; NMI Quick; White, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-06-06
Citations: 280 F. App'x 323
Docket Number: No. 07-2096
Parties: Darris D. TEEL, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. CITY OF GREENVILLE (NC) POLICE DEPARTMENT; Officer Weaver; K. Woodford; Laughinghouse; R. Wright; Bill Little; NMI Quick; White, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 280
Pages: 323–324

Head Matter:
Darris D. TEEL, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. CITY OF GREENVILLE (NC) POLICE DEPARTMENT; Officer Weaver; K. Woodford; Laughinghouse; R. Wright; Bill Little; NMI Quick; White, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 07-2096.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 23, 2008.
Decided: June 6, 2008.
Darris D. Teel, Appellant Pro Se. William Jarvis Little, III, City of Greenville, Greenville, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Darris D. Teel appeals the district court's orders denying his motion for summary judgment, pretrial dismissal of sev eral of his claims, and dismissal of the remaining claims following a trial on his action alleging violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000), Americans with Disabilities Act, and other federal and state law claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. Teel v. City of Greenville, No. 4:05-cv-00168-BR (E.D.N.C. Oct. 3, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.