Case Name: Mary CAMPILII, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mary RHODES, Charles Rhodes, Sr., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-06-02
Citations: 428 F. App'x 916
Docket Number: No. 11-10169
Parties: Mary CAMPILII, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Mary RHODES, Charles Rhodes, Sr., Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before HULL and BLACK, Circuit Judges, and HUCK, District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 428
Pages: 916–916

Head Matter:
Mary CAMPILII, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Mary RHODES, Charles Rhodes, Sr., Defendants—Appellees.
No. 11-10169.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
June 2, 2011.
Larry I. Smith, Thompson & Smith, P.C., Augusta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Charles Mayers, Law Offices of Charles Mayers, Augusta, GA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before HULL and BLACK, Circuit Judges, and HUCK, District Judge.
Honorable Paul C. Huck, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Florida, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
After review and oral argument, the Court concludes the Plaintiff-Appellant Mary Campilii has not shown reversible error in the district court's order, dated December 20, 2010, 2010 WL 5313751, granting summary judgment in favor of the Defendants-Appellees Charles Rhodes, Sr. and Mary Rhodes on Plaintiff-Appellant's Complaint.
AFFIRMED.