Case Name: Clarence ROULHAC, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Alton BASKERVILLE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-02-08
Citations: 3 F. App'x 82
Docket Number: No. 00-7637
Parties: Clarence ROULHAC, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Alton BASKERVILLE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 3
Pages: 82–82

Head Matter:
Clarence ROULHAC, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Alton BASKERVILLE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 00-7637.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 23, 2001.
Decided Feb. 8, 2001.
Clarence Roulhac, Jr., pro se. Richard Bain Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for appellee.
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Clarence Roulhac, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Roulhac v. Baskerville, No. CA-00-160 (E.D.Va. Nov. 3, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.