Case Name: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. SAMUEL LEE CLARK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1975-01-21
Citations: 66 N.J. 339
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. SAMUEL LEE CLARK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 66
Pages: 339–340

Head Matter:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. SAMUEL LEE CLARK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Argued October 22, 1974
Decided January 21, 1975.
Mr. Howard Allen Cohen argued the cause for appellant (Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Mr. Cohen, of counsel and on the brief).
Mr. E. Carl Broege argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Stanley Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney; Mr. Broege, of counsel).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division, 128 N. J. Super. 120.