Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mario LOPEZ-VEGA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-02-23
Citations: 415 F. App'x 798
Docket Number: No. 10-10246
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mario LOPEZ-VEGA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 415
Pages: 798–799

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mario LOPEZ-VEGA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-10246.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 15, 2011.
Filed Feb. 23, 2011.
Lawrence Lee, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Ramiro Flores, Jr., Flores & Haywood, PLLC, Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Mario Lopez-Vega appeals from the 84-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Mario Lopez-Vega contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable, given his difficult life and the impact violence, drugs, and alcohol have had on his emotional and mental health. In light of the totality of the circumstances and the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), the district court's sentence is not substantively unreasonable. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 993-94 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.