Case Name: Robbie MOUZON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James CLAUSON, Officer; Sgt. Hair; Aubrey Kelly, Individual and in their Official Capacities, Defendants-Appellees, and James Metis, Sheriff, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-10-24
Citations: 585 F. App'x 110
Docket Number: No. 14-6713
Parties: Robbie MOUZON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James CLAUSON, Officer; Sgt. Hair; Aubrey Kelly, Individual and in their Official Capacities, Defendants-Appellees, and James Metis, Sheriff, Defendant.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 585
Pages: 110–111

Head Matter:
Robbie MOUZON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James CLAUSON, Officer; Sgt. Hair; Aubrey Kelly, Individual and in their Official Capacities, Defendants-Appellees, and James Metis, Sheriff, Defendant.
No. 14-6713.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 21, 2014.
Decided: Oct. 24, 2014.
Robbie Mouzon, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, David Allan De-Masters, Davidson & Lindemann, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Robbie Mouzon appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mouzon v. Clawson, No. 1:13-cv-00818-RBH, 2014 WL 1668293 (D.S.C. Apr. 25, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.