Case Name: Irene McNamara, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. Eastman Kodak Company, Appellant, Impleaded, etc.
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1919-10
Citations: 189 A.D. 923
Docket Number: 
Parties: Irene McNamara, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. Eastman Kodak Company, Appellant, Impleaded, etc.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 189
Pages: 923–923

Head Matter:
Irene McNamara, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. Eastman Kodak Company, Appellant, Impleaded, etc.

Opinion:
Motion for reargument granted, and particularly on the question whether or not the court should have limited the jury in its consideration of the alleged fraud of Mullen in procuring the release, to the claim that the $300 was paid to the plaintiff as a gratuity only. Reargument to be had on October thirteenth.