Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Nathaniel Jerome OSBORNE, a/k/a Rome, Defendant - Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-04-23
Citations: 323 F. App'x 286
Docket Number: No. 08-8264
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Nathaniel Jerome OSBORNE, a/k/a Rome, Defendant — Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 323
Pages: 286–286

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Nathaniel Jerome OSBORNE, a/k/a Rome, Defendant — Appellant.
No. 08-8264.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 16, 2009.
Decided: April 23, 2009.
Nathaniel Jerome Osborne, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Nathaniel Jerome Osborne appeals the district court's order granting his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Osborne, No. 2:95-cr-00139-HCM-1 (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 22, 2008 & entered Sept. 23, 2008); see United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247, 257 (4th Cir.2009) ("[A] district judge is not authorized to reduce a defendant's sentence below the amended guideline range."). We deny Osborne's motion to place the case in abeyance for Dunphy as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.