Case Name: James Hedges, Plaintiff in Error, v. The North Missouri Railroad Company, Defendant in Error
Court: Supreme Court of Missouri
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1871-08
Citations: 48 Mo. 382
Docket Number: 
Parties: James Hedges, Plaintiff in Error, v. The North Missouri Railroad Company, Defendant in Error.
Judges: The other judges concur.
Reporter: Missouri Reports
Volume: 48
Pages: 382–382

Head Matter:
James Hedges, Plaintiff in Error, v. The North Missouri Railroad Company, Defendant in Error.
1. Practice, Supreme Court — Law points not saved and no bill of exceptions, judgment affirmed.— Where no questions of law are raised, and no bill of exceptions is preserved, the judgment will be affirmed.
Error to Clinton Circuit Court.
Birch, and Vories & Vories, for plaintiff in error.
George ¡V. Bunn, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
Wagner, Judge,
delivered the opinion of the court.
The record in this case presents essentially the same state of facts that was exhibited in the case of Blankenship v. North Mo. R.R., ante, p. 376. There are no questions of law raised or saved at the trial, and no bill of exceptions -preserved.
Judgment affirmed.
The other judges concur.