Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Benjamin CANEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-12-29
Citations: 305 F. App'x 430
Docket Number: No. 07-10577
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Benjamin CANEZ, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 305
Pages: 430–430

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Benjamin CANEZ, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 07-10577.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 17, 2008.
Filed Dec. 29, 2008.
Claire Kiehl Lefkowitz, Esq., USTUOffice of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Natman Schaye, Esq., Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Benjamin Canez appeals from the 25-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Canez contends that it was unreasonable for the district court to impose an above-Guidelines range sentence pursuant to the departure provision set forth in U.S.S.G. § 7B1.4 Application Note 3, and that the sentence is also unreasonable in light of the applicable 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. We conclude that the sentence is reasonable. See United States v. Miqbel, 444 F.3d 1173, 1176 (9th Cir.2006); United States v. Mohamed, 459 F.3d 979, 986-87 (9th Cir.2006).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.