Case Name: In the Matter of Kingsboro Liquors, Inc., Appellant, v. State Liquor Authority et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1969-03-06
Citations: 24 N.Y.2d 774
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Kingsboro Liquors, Inc., Appellant, v. State Liquor Authority et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 24
Pages: 774–775

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Kingsboro Liquors, Inc., Appellant, v. State Liquor Authority et al., Respondents.
Argued February 19, 1969;
decided March 6, 1969.
Solomon B. Terkeltoub for appellant.
Benjamin Laskin and Hyman Amsel for State Liquor Authority, respondent.
No appearance for Jome Wines & Liquors, Inc., respondent.

Opinion:
Concur: Chief Judge Fold and Judges Bubke, Beegah, Beeitel and Jasek. Judges Scileppi and Keating dissent and vote to reverse on the ground there was no rational basis for the finding of the State Liquor Authority that public advantage and convenience would be served by the granting of the license.