Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Aurelio OCAMPO-ROJAS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-09-19
Citations: 19 F. App'x 536
Docket Number: No. 00-10423; D.C. No. CR-00-00918-JMR
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Aurelio OCAMPO-ROJAS, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before HUG, PREGERSON, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 19
Pages: 536–536

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Aurelio OCAMPO-ROJAS, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 00-10423.
D.C. No. CR-00-00918-JMR.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 10, 2001.
Decided Sept. 19, 2001.
Before HUG, PREGERSON, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Aurelio Ocampo-Rojas appeals the final judgment of conviction and sentence upon his guilty plea to one count of illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), with sentencing enhancement pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2). We dismiss.
Ocampo-Rojas contends that the district court erred in the extent of its downward departure in sentence for his participation in fast track sentencing; for his cultural assimilation; for over-representation of criminal history and for the minor nature of his underlying felony. Because nothing in the record indicates that the district court believed it lacked the discretion to depart for the reasons offered by OcampoRojas and because the extent of the district court's downward departure is unreviewable, we lack jurisdiction to review Ocampo-Rojas's challenge to the departure. United States v. Riggins, 40 F.3d 1055, 1058 (9th Cir.1994).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.