Case Name: Gladys VEIGA et al., Appellants, v. SOUTH CAROLINA INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1973-03-06
Citations: 274 So. 2d 10
Docket Number: No. 72-891
Parties: Gladys VEIGA et al., Appellants, v. SOUTH CAROLINA INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and HAVERFIELD, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 274
Pages: 10–10

Head Matter:
Gladys VEIGA et al., Appellants, v. SOUTH CAROLINA INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Appellees.
No. 72-891.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 6, 1973.
Spear & Johnston, Miami Beach, for appellants.
Corlett, Merritt, Killian & Okell, Miami, for appellees.
Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The plaintiff appealed a summary judgment entered in favor of the defendant in a personal injury action. We find merit in the appeal. The evidence before the court on hearing the motion for summary judgment disclosed the existence of a tria-ble issue as to assumption of risk by the plaintiff which could not properly be determined by summary judgment.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded for further proceedings.