Case Name: Jack R. BRUCE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-08-25
Citations: 622 So. 2d 638
Docket Number: No. 92-01360
Parties: Jack R. BRUCE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: DANAHY, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 622
Pages: 638–638

Head Matter:
Jack R. BRUCE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 92-01360.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Aug. 25, 1993.
Judith Ellis, St. Petersburg, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Katherine V. Blanco, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant argues that the court erred when it revoked his probation. Although our review leads us to conclude that the record contains sufficient evidence to find that appellant violated his probation, we remand for the trial court to properly specify which conditions were violated in a written order of revocation.
DANAHY, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.