Case Name: Rodney DONELSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2015-05-12
Citations: 461 S.W.3d 452
Docket Number: No. ED 101295
Parties: Rodney DONELSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent.
Judges: Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 461
Pages: 452–452

Head Matter:
Rodney DONELSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent.
No. ED 101295
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Filed: May 12, 2015
Jessica Hathaway, St. Louis, for Mov-ant/Appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, for Plaintiff/Respondent.
Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Rodney Donelson appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k); Williams v. State, 168 S.W.3d 433, 439 (Mo.banc 2005). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. 2013, unless otherwise indicated.