Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ahmad Rashad STEVENS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-06-19
Citations: 38 F. App'x 471
Docket Number: No. 01-35835; D.C. No. CV-00-00329-A-HRH
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Ahmad Rashad STEVENS, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 38
Pages: 471–472

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Ahmad Rashad STEVENS, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 01-35835.
D.C. No. CV-00-00329-A-HRH.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 10, 2002.
Decided June 19, 2002.
Before RYMER, T.G. NELSON, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Ahmad Rashad Stevens appeals the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion challenging his conviction and sentence for one count of conspiracy in relation to cocaine distribution (21 U.S.C. § 846) and two counts of possession of cocaine with intent to distribute (21 U.S.C. § 841(a)). Stevens contends that under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), his conviction and sentence violated his rights under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments because drug quantity was neither charged in the indictment nor proven to the jury beyond a reasonable doubt. We recently held that the rule announced in Apprendi does not apply retroactively to cases on initial collateral review. United States v. Sanchez-Cervantes, 282 F.3d 664 (9th Cir.2002). The district court's judgment is therefore AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.