Case Name: Antonia RUSH-BANKS, Claimant/Appellant, v. DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2011-11-08
Citations: 354 S.W.3d 246
Docket Number: No. ED 96265
Parties: Antonia RUSH-BANKS, Claimant/Appellant, v. DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 354
Pages: 246–247

Head Matter:
Antonia RUSH-BANKS, Claimant/Appellant, v. DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 96265.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Nov. 8, 2011.
Rehearing Denied Dec. 12, 2011.
Gaylard T. Williams, The Law Office of Gaylard T. Williams, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Bart A. Matanic, Industrial Relations-Division of Employment Security, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Claimant, Antonia Rush-Banks, appeals from the Order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the decision of the Appeals Tribunal of the Division of Employment Security finding claimant disqualified from unemployment benefits. The Order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm the Order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).