Case Name: Morris WEISFELD, d/b/a M & W Fruit Company, Appellant, v. ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1966-01-05
Citations: 354 F.2d 241
Docket Number: No. 22278
Parties: Morris WEISFELD, d/b/a M & W Fruit Company, Appellant, v. ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 354
Pages: 241–241

Head Matter:
Morris WEISFELD, d/b/a M & W Fruit Company, Appellant, v. ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.
No. 22278.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
Jan. 5, 1966.
Billy B. Goldberg, Houston, Tex., for appellant.
Newton Gresham, Houston, Tex., Fulbright, Crooker, Freeman, Bates & Jaworski, Houston, Tex., for appellee.
Before JONES and BROWN, Circuit Judges, and DYER, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The district court's opinion sets forth the facts from which the controversy presented by this appeal have arisen. Weisfeld v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, 236 F.Supp. 496. In its opinion, the district court expresses its view of the controlling principle of law. We are in agreement with the result reached by the district court and its judgment is
Affirmed.