Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Richard D. EDGAR, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1993-09-28
Citations: 861 S.W.2d 216
Docket Number: No. 62312
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Richard D. EDGAR, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 861
Pages: 216–216

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Richard D. EDGAR, Defendant/Appellant.
No. 62312.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Sept. 28, 1993.
Sara Serot, Public Defender, St. Charles, for defendanVappellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., David B. Cosgrove, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff/respondent.
Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals his conviction, by a jury, of attempting to steal a motor vehicle, § 564.011, RSMo 1986. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).