Case Name: FINN v. BOND, Chief Justice, et al.
Court: Supreme Court of Texas
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1946-11-06
Citations: 197 S.W.2d 108
Docket Number: No. A-1007
Parties: FINN v. BOND, Chief Justice, et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 197
Pages: 108–108

Head Matter:
FINN v. BOND, Chief Justice, et al.
No. A-1007.
Supreme Court of Texas.
Nov. 6, 1946.
Ely Straus, of Dallas, for relator.
No appearance for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to file a petition for mandamus to compel the Court of Civil Appeals at Dallas to certify certain questions on the ground of conflict of the courts in the construction of Article 4632 of the Revised Civil Statutes is overruled, because the Court of Civil Appeals in this case (Finn v. Finn, 195 S.W.2d 679) correctly held that under Article 4632, which requires "full and satisfactory evidence," to support a decree of divorce, corroboration of the testimony of the complaining spouse is not an indispensable requirement, as a matter of law, even where a denial is entered.