Case Name: Jean A. HOLLOCK, Respondent v. ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE, Petitioner
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2005-06-28
Citations: 586 Pa. 262
Docket Number: No. 152 MAL 2004
Parties: Jean A. HOLLOCK, Respondent v. ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE, Petitioner.
Judges: 
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 586
Pages: 262–262

Head Matter:
893 A.2d 66
Jean A. HOLLOCK, Respondent v. ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE, Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
June 28, 2005.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 28th day of June, 2005, Petitioner's Application for Leave to Supplement its Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the following issues:
1) Whether conduct of a party during a bad faith action under 42 Pa.C.S. § 8371 is admissible to support a finding of punitive damages.
2) What scope of review should an appellate court apply when reviewing a punitive damages award?