Case Name: Brian MURPHY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2009-10-30
Citations: 21 So. 3d 118
Docket Number: No. 5D09-2065
Parties: Brian MURPHY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: TORPY, LAWSON and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 21
Pages: 118–119

Head Matter:
Brian MURPHY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D09-2065.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Oct. 30, 2009.
Brian Murphy, Chipley, pro se.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Ap-pellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Brian Murphy appeals the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion, which raised four claims. Because the denial order fails to provide an adequate rationale or specific references to the record to support the denial, we reverse the order on appeal and remand with instructions that the trial court either enter a sufficient order or conduct an evidentiary hearing on the claims. See, e.g., MeLin v. State, 827 So.2d 948, 954 (Fla.2002).
REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.
TORPY, LAWSON and EVANDER, JJ., concur.