Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Lynn YOUNG, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-03-09
Citations: 681 F. App'x 684
Docket Number: No. 16-1430
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Lynn YOUNG, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MATHESON, BACHARACH, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 681
Pages: 684–684

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Lynn YOUNG, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-1430
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
Filed March 9, 2017
Michael Conrad Johnson, Office of the United States Attorney, District of Colorado, Denver, CO, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Meredith B. Esser, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Districts of Colorado and Wyoming, Denver, CO, for Defendant-Appellant
Before MATHESON, BACHARACH, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER AND JUDGMENT
Per Curiam
This matter is before us on Appellee's Unopposed Motion for Summary Affir-mance. The United States moves for summary affirmance of the district court's judgment in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Beckles v. United States, — U.S.-, 137 S.Ct. 886, 197 L.Ed.2d 145, 2017 WL 855781 (Mar. 6, 2017). Appellant William Lynn Young does not oppose the motion.
Upon consideration, the motion is granted. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
The mandate shall issue forthwith.
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.