Case Name: S. C. JOHNSON & SON, Inc., v. The R. F. JOHNSTON PAINT CO. and William A. Dail, Its Receiver
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1936-12-15
Citations: 86 F.2d 1012
Docket Number: No. 7379
Parties: S. C. JOHNSON & SON, Inc., v. The R. F. JOHNSTON PAINT CO. and William A. Dail, Its Receiver.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 86
Pages: 1012–1012

Head Matter:
S. C. JOHNSON & SON, Inc., v. The R. F. JOHNSTON PAINT CO. and William A. Dail, Its Receiver.
No. 7379.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Dec. 15, 1936.
Edward S. Rogers, of Chicago, Ill., Edwin B. H. Tower, Jr., of Milwaukee, Wis., and Peck, Shaffer & Williams, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellant.
Maxwell & Ramsey and Murray & Zugelter, all of Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellees.
Before HICKS, SIMONS, and ALLEN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
On motion by counsel for appellees herein and stipulation of counsel for both parties and good. cause therefore having been shown,
It is ordered that the appeal of the S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc., be and hereby is dismissed and that the mandate of this court in the above-entitled cause shall issue forthwith remanding this cause to the District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Divisioh, for the entry of a consent decree.