Case Name: Peter L. DiPasquale et al., Appellants, v. Baker-Roos, Inc., et al., Respondents and Third-Party Plaintiffs. Alden Central School District, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1989-12-20
Citations: 156 A.D.2d 941
Docket Number: 
Parties: Peter L. DiPasquale et al., Appellants, v Baker-Roos, Inc., et al., Respondents and Third-Party Plaintiffs. Alden Central School District, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 156
Pages: 941–942

Head Matter:
Peter L. DiPasquale et al., Appellants, v Baker-Roos, Inc., et al., Respondents and Third-Party Plaintiffs. Alden Central School District, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

Opinion:
Order reversed on the law, with costs, complaint reinstated and new trial granted. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred when it dismissed plaintiffs' causes of action and complaint in its entirety as against defendants, Baker-Roos, Inc. and Faultless Division of Bliss and Laughlin Industries after opening statements to the jury. Dismissal of a complaint on the plaintiffs' opening statement is strongly disfavored (Seminara v Iadanza, 131 AD2d 457, 459). No complaint may be dismissed upon counsel's opening unless the facts as alleged and presented by counsel preclude any possibility of plaintiffs' recovery (Jurewicz v Lucarelli, 11 AD2d 751). That situation is not present in the instant record. In our view, the complaint and bills of particulars adequately apprised defendants of plaintiffs' claims of negligence; thus, plaintiffs' causes of action should be reinstated against all defendants and a new trial granted.
All concur, except Boomer, J., who dissents and votes to affirm, in the following memorandum.