Case Name: Henry Clay KING, Jr., Petitioner/Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2008-12-16
Citations: 271 S.W.3d 638
Docket Number: No. ED 90961
Parties: Henry Clay KING, Jr., Petitioner/Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before BOOKER T. SHAW, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and MARY K. HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 271
Pages: 638–638

Head Matter:
Henry Clay KING, Jr., Petitioner/Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 90961.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Dec. 16, 2008.
C. John Pleban, Edward P. Radetic, Lynette M. Petruska, Pleban and Associates, LLC, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
James A. Chenault, III, Special Assistant Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before BOOKER T. SHAW, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and MARY K. HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, Henry Clay King, Jr., appeals from the trial court's judgment denying his petition for review of the revocation of his driving privileges under section 577.041 RSMo (2000) after he refused to submit to a chemical blood test. No error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).