Case Name: Emelina C. TELLEZ, et al., Appellants, v. Alejandro CALLEJAS, et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-03-26
Citations: 576 So. 2d 912
Docket Number: No. 90-809
Parties: Emelina C. TELLEZ, et al., Appellants, v. Alejandro CALLEJAS, et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, JORGENSON and GERSTEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 576
Pages: 912–912

Head Matter:
Emelina C. TELLEZ, et al., Appellants, v. Alejandro CALLEJAS, et al., Appellees.
No. 90-809.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 26, 1991.
Alfonso Oviedo-Reyes, Miami, for appellants.
Leonardo P. Mendez, Miami, appellees.
Before BARKDULL, JORGENSON and GERSTEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Emelina C. Tellez, appeals a final judgment in an action for dissolution of a partnership. We affirm.
In an appellate proceeding, the decision of the trial court has a presumption of correctness. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979); Anderman v. Miller, 359 So.2d 472 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). It is not the function of an appellate court to reweigh the evidence and the credibility of the witnesses in the trial court proceedings. Froman v. Froman, 458 So.2d 833 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).
Affirmed.