Case Name: The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Strohacker, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1996-12-11
Citations: 77 Ohio St. 3d 162
Docket Number: No. 96-888
Parties: The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Strohacker, Appellant.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Douglas Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Stratton, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 77
Pages: 162–162

Head Matter:
The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Strohacker, Appellant.
[Cite as State v. Strohacker (1996), 77 Ohio St.3d 162.]
(No. 96-888
Submitted November 12, 1996
Decided December 11, 1996.)
Bradley & Giardini Co., L.P.A., and Jack W. Bradley, for appellant.

Opinion:
The discretionary appeal to this court was allowed only as to "Proposition of Law One," which states:
"Failure to advise a defendant of his right to an independent chemical test violates both the defendant's statutory and constitutional rights and must result in a suppression of the test results."
The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Hilliard v. Elfrink (1996), 77 Ohio St.3d 155, 672 N.E.2d 166, decided today.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Stratton, JJ., concur.