Case Name: JAMES M. SMITH, App'lt, v. ELIZABETH VAN ANTWERP, Resp't
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1887-03-02
Citations: 6 N.Y. St. Rep. 863
Docket Number: 
Parties: JAMES M. SMITH, App’lt, v. ELIZABETH VAN ANTWERP, Resp’t.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 6
Pages: 863–863

Head Matter:
JAMES M. SMITH, App’lt, v. ELIZABETH VAN ANTWERP, Resp’t.
Complaint—Dismissal of.
Appeal from judgment dismissing complaint.
Albert Day and IF. II. Newman, for app’lt; W. G. Beecher, for resp’t.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The evidence which in general language was given on the trial, supported the judgment from which the appeal has been taken. If the plaintiff desired more specific or further information as to the incumbrances and loans upon the property, it was his duty to prosecute the inquiry. Having failed to do so, he cannot, because of that failure, object to the propriety of the judgment.
The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.