Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Luis VALDEZ-JAIMES, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-02-15
Citations: 417 F. App'x 390
Docket Number: No. 10-50429
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Luis VALDEZ-JAIMES, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before HIGGINBOTHAM, GARZA, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 417
Pages: 390–390

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Luis VALDEZ-JAIMES, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-50429
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Feb. 15, 2011.
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Philip J. Lynch, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Henry Joseph Bemporad, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, GARZA, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Jose Luis Valdez-Jaimes presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Brown, 920 F.2d 1212, 1216-17 (5th Cir.1991), abrogated on other grounds by United States v. Candia, 454 F.3d 468, 472-73 (5th Cir.2006), which held that a district court may order a term of imprisonment to run consecutively to an unimposed state sentence. The Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.