Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Perry FORREST, Jr., Defendant/Respondent; Perry FORREST, Jr., Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1992-12-22
Citations: 842 S.W.2d 586
Docket Number: Nos. 59226, 61567
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Perry FORREST, Jr., Defendant/Respondent. Perry FORREST, Jr., Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 842
Pages: 586–586

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Perry FORREST, Jr., Defendant/Respondent. Perry FORREST, Jr., Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 59226, 61567.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Dec. 22, 1992.
Laura E. O’Sullivan, St. Louis, for appellant.
William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Joan F. Gummels, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Defendant was convicted under § 195.-202.2, RSMo Cum.Supp.1991, of illegal possession of cocaine, a controlled substance. The trial court sentenced defendant to five years in the Department of Corrections. He appeals from that judgment.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment and sentence are affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25.
In addition, defendant filed a Rule 29.15 motion. An evidentiary hearing was conducted. The motion court filed extensive findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order, and denied the motion.
The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. The order of the motion court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).