Case Name: Joseph S. Boyd, Appellant, v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. 7-7, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent. (And Three Other Actions.)
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1998-08-27
Citations: 92 N.Y.2d 885
Docket Number: 
Parties: Joseph S. Boyd, Appellant, v Bethlehem Steel Corporation, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. 7-7, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent. (And Three Other Actions.)
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 92
Pages: 885–885

Head Matter:
Joseph S. Boyd, Appellant, v Bethlehem Steel Corporation, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. 7-7, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent. (And Three Other Actions.)
Submitted June 8, 1998;
decided August 27, 1998

Opinion:
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order that affirmed the denial of appellant's motion to compel the acceptance of an amended/supplemental bill of particulars and the Appellate Division order that affirmed the denial of appellant's motion to renew, dismissed upon the ground that those orders do not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.