Case Name: William REESE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-10-04
Citations: 201 F. App'x 961
Docket Number: No. 06-1598
Parties: William REESE, Petitioner—Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent—Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 201
Pages: 961–962

Head Matter:
William REESE, Petitioner—Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent—Appellee.
No. 06-1598.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 28, 2006.
Decided: Oct. 4, 2006.
William Reese, Appellant Pro Se. Eileen J. O’Connor Assistant Attorney General, Richard Farber, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.; Donald L. Korb, Internal Revenue Service, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
William Reese appeals the tax court's order granting summary judgment and allowing the Commissioner of Internal Revenue to proceed with its collection of Reese's tax liabilities for the 1988 to 1992 tax years. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. Reese v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, No. 1174-05L, 2006 WL 314422 (U.S.T.C. Feb. 9, 2006). We deny Reese's motion to vacate our order allowing the Commissioner additional time to file an informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.