Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John L. BATTAGLIA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1970-05-25
Citations: 426 F.2d 894
Docket Number: No. 25010
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John L. BATTAGLIA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before DUNIWAY and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and POWELL, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 426
Pages: 894–894

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John L. BATTAGLIA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 25010.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 25, 1970.
Dwain Clark (argued), Daniel N. Busby, Beverly Hills, of Marshall & Clark, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellant.
Allan E. Streller (argued) Spec. Asst. U. S. Atty., Wm. Matthew Byrne, Jr., U. S. Atty., David R. Nissen, Robert L. Brosio, Asst. U. S. Attys., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before DUNIWAY and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and POWELL, District Judge.
Honorable Charles L. Powell, United States District Judge, Eastern District of Washington, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Battaglia appeals from an order revoking probation. In essence, his argument is that the evidence of his violation of the. terms of his probation is so slight that we should hold that the trial judge abused his discretion. See Whitfield v. United States, 9 Cir., 1968, 401 F.2d 480, 482; Longknife v. United States, 9 Cir., 1967, 381 F.2d 17, 19. On this record, we cannot so hold. There is substantial evidence of repeated and' serious violations of the terms of Battaglia's probation.
Affirmed.