Case Name: Edward Sabari BRYAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SCDC; Jonathan E. OZMINT, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-02-25
Citations: 367 F. App'x 404
Docket Number: No. 09-7953
Parties: Edward Sabari BRYAN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. SCDC; Jonathan E. OZMINT, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 367
Pages: 404–405

Head Matter:
Edward Sabari BRYAN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. SCDC; Jonathan E. OZMINT, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 09-7953.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 18, 2010.
Decided: Feb. 25, 2010.
Edward Sabari Bryan, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Blaine Rosbrugh, Davidson & Lindemann, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Edward Sabari Bryan appeals the district court's order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment for the Defendants on Bryan's action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bryan v. SCDC, No. 3:08-cv-00846-RBH, 2009 WL 3166632 (D.S.C. Sept. 29, 2009). Additionally, we deny Bryan's motions to compel and for production of a transcript. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.