Case Name: Fitts, Respondent, v. Beardsley, Appellant, et al.
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1889-12-30
Citations: 8 N.Y.S. 947
Docket Number: 
Parties: Fitts, Respondent, v. Beardsley, Appellant, et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 8
Pages: 947–947

Head Matter:
Fitts, Respondent, v. Beardsley, Appellant, et al.
(Supreme Court, General Term, Fifth Department.
December 30, 1889.)
Appeal from special term, Cayuga county.
Argued before Babkeb, P. J., and Dwigi-it and Macombek, JJ.
John D. Teller, for appellant. Sereno Payne, for respondent.

Opinion:
Barker, P. J.
This case is precisely like the case between the same parties just decided, (ante 567,) except that this action is prosecuted by the receiver for the benefit of another creditor, the Central National Bank of New York, who recovered a judgment on the 26th day of September, 1879, for the sum of $10,187.40. The findings of fact, and the conclusions of law thereon, and the form of the judgment entered are substantially the same as in the other action, a personal judgment being entered for the sum due on the judgment in favor of the bank and the costs of the proceedings. As the sum realized by the appellant out of the assets of Ross, as appears by the record in this case, is greater than the sum recovered after deducting the amount of the recovery in the other action, there is no necessity for considering any questions other than those which were passed upon in the preceding case. Judgment is modified in accordance with the opinion in the first of these cases, and as modified affirmed, with costs to the respondent. All concur.