Case Name: Clifford H. WASHBURN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-01-23
Citations: 805 So. 2d 1057
Docket Number: No. 1D01-1181
Parties: Clifford H. WASHBURN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: BOOTH, BARFIELD, and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 805
Pages: 1057–1058

Head Matter:
Clifford H. WASHBURN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D01-1181.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jan. 23, 2002.
Appellant, pro sei
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellant's motion, filed pursuant to rule 3.800(a), is facially insufficient to demonstrate entitlement to relief, and we therefore affirm the summary denial of this claim. See State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla.1998); Baker v. State, 714 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). However, this affirmance is without prejudice to the appellant's right to refile a facially sufficient motion under rule 3.800, if he is able to do so. The present denial will not stand as a bar to a successive motion raising these claims. See Tranquille v. State, 747 So.2d 426 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).
AFFIRMED.
BOOTH, BARFIELD, and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.