Case Name: PEERLESS INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, as Subrogee of Right Touch Interiors, Inc.; Excelsior Insurance Company, as Subrogee of Southeast Church Furniture, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF GREENSBORO, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-01-14
Citations: 628 F. App'x 202
Docket Number: No. 15-1790
Parties: PEERLESS INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, as Subrogee of Right Touch Interiors, Inc.; Excelsior Insurance Company, as Subrogee of Southeast Church Furniture, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF GREENSBORO, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 628
Pages: 202–202

Head Matter:
PEERLESS INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, as Subrogee of Right Touch Interiors, Inc.; Excelsior Insurance Company, as Subrogee of Southeast Church Furniture, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF GREENSBORO, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 15-1790.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dee. 31, 2015.
Decided: Jan. 14, 2016.
Jay M. Goldstein, Goldstein Law PLLC, Albert S. Nalibotsky, Saltz Matkov, PC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellants. Bruce P. Ashley, Patrick M. Kane, Lisa W. Arthur, Smith Moore Leatherwood LLP, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished Per Curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Plaintiffs, Peerless Indemnity Insurance Company and Excelsior Insurance Company, appeal the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of the City of Greensboro in Plaintiffs' negligence action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Peerless Indem. Ins. Co. v. City of Greensboro, No. 1:13-cv-01104LCB-LPA (M.D.N.C. June 23, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.