Case Name: The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Leovigildo PADRON, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1988-02-16
Citations: 519 So. 2d 1144
Docket Number: No. 87-516
Parties: The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Leovigildo PADRON, Appellee.
Judges: Before HENDRY, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 519
Pages: 1144–1145

Head Matter:
The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Leovigildo PADRON, Appellee.
No. 87-516.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 16, 1988.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Steven T. Scott, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Henry H. Harnage, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Before HENDRY, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The trial court dismissed the charges against Padrón based on the state's failure to disclose the identity of the confidential informant. The court found that defendant may have been prejudiced in his ability to present his asserted defense of entrap ment. We remand the cause for further proceedings to enable the trial court to determine whether the state's conduct falls within the ruling of Aldazabal v. State, 471 So.2d 639 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).
Reversed and remanded.
HENDRY and BASKIN, JJ., concur.