Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Javier CHAPA-NUNEZ, also known as Simon Rodriguez-Nunez, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-12-15
Citations: 624 F. App'x 246
Docket Number: No. 15-40383
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Javier CHAPA-NUNEZ, also known as Simon Rodriguez-Nunez, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before JONES, SOUTHWICK, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 624
Pages: 246–247

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Javier CHAPA-NUNEZ, also known as Simon Rodriguez-Nunez, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-40383
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 15, 2015.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Laura Fletcher Leavitt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, H. Michael Soko-low, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendanfi-Appellant.
Javier Chapa-Nunez, Three Rivers, TX, pro se.
Before JONES, SOUTHWICK, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Javier Chapa-Nunez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Cha-pa-Nunez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We eoncur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.