Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nancy Gutierrez SMELOSKY, also known as Nancy Smelosky, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-03-07
Citations: 221 F. App'x 363
Docket Number: No. 06-10942
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nancy Gutierrez SMELOSKY, also known as Nancy Smelosky, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 221
Pages: 363–363

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nancy Gutierrez SMELOSKY, also known as Nancy Smelosky, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-10942
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 7, 2007.
Bret E. Helmer, U.S. Attorney’s Office Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Federal Public Defender’s Office Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Nancy Gutierrez Smelosky raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Scroggins, 411 F.3d 572, 576-77 (5th Cir.2005), which held that the Due Process Clause does not bar the application of Justice Breyer's remedy opinion in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), when resentencing defendants in light of Booker. The Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.