Case Name: THE FLORIDA BAR re BECKER & POLIAKOFF, P.A.
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-11-09
Citations: 771 So. 2d 1135
Docket Number: No. SC97130
Parties: THE FLORIDA BAR re BECKER & POLIAKOFF, P.A.
Judges: WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 771
Pages: 1135–1136

Head Matter:
THE FLORIDA BAR re BECKER & POLIAKOFF, P.A.
No. SC97130.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Nov. 9, 2000.
Gerald F. Richman, Joseph F. Hession and John R. Whittles of Richman, Greer, Weil, Brumbaugh, Mirabito & Christensen, P.A., West Palm Beach, Florida, for Petitioner.
Barry Richard of Greenberg, Traurig, P.A., Tallahassee, Florida, for The Florida Bar, Respondent.
John B. Liebman of O’Neill, Chapin, Liebman & Cooper, P.A., Orlando, Florida, for Interested Persons, Kathleen Burgener, Paul Wean and Robert Tankel.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Becker & Poliakoff, P.A., petitioned the Court to rescind Florida Bar Advisory Ethics Opinion 93-4. We held oral argument on October 4, 2000. After further consideration, we have determined that we should decline to exercise jurisdiction. Therefore, the petition is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
ANSTEAD, J., concurs specially with an opinion, in which PARIENTE, J., concurs.