Case Name: Joseph A. Epstein and Others, Copartners, etc., Appellants, v. National Surety Company of New York, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1926-01
Citations: 215 A.D. 840
Docket Number: 
Parties: Joseph A. Epstein and Others, Copartners, etc., Appellants, v. National Surety Company of New York, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 215
Pages: 840–840

Head Matter:
Joseph A. Epstein and Others, Copartners, etc., Appellants, v. National Surety Company of New York, Respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. The complaint of appellant concerning the alleged improper conduct of defendant's trial counsel should have been made to the trial justice by appropriate objection and exception to his rulings. But one exception is presented to us, and in this particular instance we think it does not present reversible error. Present — Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ.