Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. KEVIN LEE PENN, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1991-02-27
Citations: 106 Or. App. 171
Docket Number: C89-10-35795; CA A64779
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. KEVIN LEE PENN, Appellant.
Judges: Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 106
Pages: 171–172

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted January 7,
conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing February 27, 1991
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. KEVIN LEE PENN, Appellant.
(C89-10-35795; CA A64779)
805 P2d 755
Donald P. Roach, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.
Carol J. Fredrick, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.
Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant appeals his conviction for robbery in the first degree. The trial court imposed a minimum sentence of five years under ORS 161.610. The statute requires that minimum when a defendant is convicted of a felony "having as an element the defendant's use or threatened use of a firearm." ORS 161.610(4). The state concedes that the imposition of the minimum was error, because robbery in the first degree does not require the use or threatened use of a deadly weapon and defendant was not charged in the indictment with using or threatening to use a firearm. We accept the state's concession.
The trial court properly denied defendant's motion for judgment of acquittal.
Conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing.