Case Name: In the Matter of Gary Knowle et al., Petitioners, v. James B. Kane et al., Respondents, and Richard J. Arcara, Intervenor-Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1985-06-04
Citations: 112 A.D.2d 53
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Gary Knowle et al., Petitioners, v James B. Kane et al., Respondents, and Richard J. Arcara, Intervenor-Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 112
Pages: 53–54

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Gary Knowle et al., Petitioners, v James B. Kane et al., Respondents, and Richard J. Arcara, Intervenor-Respondent.

Opinion:
Application unanimously denied and petition dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: Mandamus, like prohibition, is an extraordinary remedy and it is not appropriate in this case (see, Matter of Legal Aid Socy. v Scheinman, 53 NY2d 12,16; see also, Matter of Okereke v Kane, 98 AD2d 990). (Article 78.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, O'Donnell, Pine and Schnepp, JJ.