Case Name: Gerard Commercial Corporation, Respondent, v. Maddalena Pietrantonio, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1928-11-21
Citations: 133 Misc. 188
Docket Number: 
Parties: Gerard Commercial Corporation, Respondent, v. Maddalena Pietrantonio, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 133
Pages: 188–189

Head Matter:
Gerard Commercial Corporation, Respondent, v. Maddalena Pietrantonio, Appellant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
November 21, 1928.
Baar & Bennett, for the appellant. .
Zalkin & Cohen, for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
' Although the trial judge was warranted in deciding that plaintiff was a holder in due course (Title Guarantee & Trust Co. v. Pam, 232 N. Y. 441) a triable issue was presented by the averments that plaintiff was carrying on the business of dis counting notes in violation of section 140 of the Banking Law. (Meserole Securities Co. v. Cosman, 131 Misc. 361.)
Judgment and order reversed, with ten dollars costs to appellant to abide the event, and motion for leave to serve an amended answer granted.
All concur; present, Delehanty, Lydon and Crain, JJ.