Case Name: Dianne FISCHER, etc., Appellant, v. Kenneth C. FISCHER, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2004-08-25
Citations: 882 So. 2d 435
Docket Number: No. 3D04-427
Parties: Dianne FISCHER, etc., Appellant, v. Kenneth C. FISCHER, Appellee.
Judges: Before GREEN, RAMIREZ, and SHEPHERD, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 882
Pages: 435–435

Head Matter:
Dianne FISCHER, etc., Appellant, v. Kenneth C. FISCHER, Appellee.
No. 3D04-427.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Aug. 25, 2004.
Simon Schindler & Sandberg, and Steven J. Silverman, for Appellant.
Leinoff & Lemos, and Andrew Leinoff, and Ansana D. Singh, for Appellee.
Before GREEN, RAMIREZ, and SHEPHERD, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Cole v. Cole, 723 So.2d 925, 927 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Marrone v. Miami Nat'l Bank, 507 So.2d 652, 653 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).
Appellee Kenneth C. Fischer's motion for attorney's fees and costs on appeal is remanded to the trial court. If the movant establishes his entitlement pursuant to section 61.16, Florida Statutes, and Rosen v. Rosen, 696 So.2d 697 (Fla.1997), the trial court is authorized to award the movant all or a portion of the reasonable appellate attorney's fees. This court concludes that the appeal by the wife lacked merit, and therefore the trial court should give great weight to the factors set forth in Rosen. See Rados v. Rados, 791 So.2d 1130 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).
We therefore affirm the order on appeal and remand the cause to the trial court to determine Kenneth C. Fischer's motion for attorney's fees and costs.