Case Name: Franklin S. Clark, Respondent, v. Kate M. Conklin et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1900-04
Citations: 31 Misc. 758
Docket Number: 
Parties: Franklin S. Clark, Respondent, v. Kate M. Conklin et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 31
Pages: 758–758

Head Matter:
Franklin S. Clark, Respondent, v. Kate M. Conklin et al., Appellants.
Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, tenth district, borough of Manhattan.
T. Davis, for appellants.
S. I. Ferguson, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Guriam.
As the record does not show that the defendants were residents of the city of'New York, the jurisdictional facts do not appear, and the judgment must, accordingly, be reversed. Willis v. Parker, 30 Misc. Rep. 750.
Present: Beekman, P. 'J., Giegerioh and O'Gorman, JJ.
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, without costs.