Case Name: LACEY TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. LACEY TOWNSHIP EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1992-10-20
Citations: 130 N.J. 312
Docket Number: 
Parties: LACEY TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. LACEY TOWNSHIP EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, O’HERN and STEIN — 5.
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 130
Pages: 312–313

Head Matter:
613 A.2d 1162
LACEY TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. LACEY TOWNSHIP EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Argued September 14, 1992
Decided October 20, 1992.
Arthur Stein argued the cause for appellant {Arthur Stein & Associates, attorneys; Maria Ann Stork and David A. Semanchik, on the brief).
Joel D. Rosen argued the cause for respondent {Wills, O’Neill & Melik, attorneys; Arnold M. Melik, of counsel).
Michael F. Kaelber, Associate Counsel, submitted a brief on behalf of amicus curiae New Jersey School Boards Association (Sheila Dow Ford, Director, Legal Department, attorney).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge D'Annunzio's majority opinion for the Appellate Division, reported at 259 N.J.Super. 397, 613 A.2d 1167 (1991).