Case Name: Moore Unemployment Compensation Case
Court: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1963-03-19
Citations: 200 Pa. Super. 199
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 421
Parties: Moore Unemployment Compensation Case.
Judges: Before Rhodes, P. J., Ervin, Wright, Woodside, Watkins, Montgomery, and Flood, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania Superior Court Reports
Volume: 200
Pages: 199–200

Head Matter:
Moore Unemployment Compensation Case.
March 19, 1963:
Argued December 12, 1962.
Before Rhodes, P. J., Ervin, Wright, Woodside, Watkins, Montgomery, and Flood, JJ.
Wm. Vincent Mullin, for appellant.
Sydney Reuben, Assistant Attorney General, with him David Stahl, Attorney General, for Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, appellee.

Opinion:
Opinion by
Montgomery, J.,
The record sufficiently supports the finding and conclusion of the board to the effect that the claim ant's insubordinate conduct and attitude toward her immediate supervisors constituted a deliberate disregard of the interests of her employer. Her failure to carry out assigned duties and her apparent preference to engage in selling to the exclusion of her other duties, as well as her discourteous attitude toward customers, are all indicative of her deliberate disregard of the standards of behavior her employer had a right to expect of her. Because of her "willful misconduct" she is disqualified under section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law. Fritsche Unemployment Compensation Case, 196 Pa. Superior Ct. 574, 176 A. 2d 186.
Decision affirmed.