Case Name: STATE of Florida, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Emanuel PRIDE, Respondent/Appellee
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-01-21
Citations: 616 So. 2d 6
Docket Number: No. 80277
Parties: STATE of Florida, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Emanuel PRIDE, Respondent/Appellee.
Judges: BARKETT, C.J., and McDONALD, SHAW, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 616
Pages: 6–6

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Emanuel PRIDE, Respondent/Appellee.
No. 80277.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Jan. 21, 1993.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and James W. Rogers, Bureau Chief, Criminal Law and Charlie McCoy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for petitioner/appellant.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender and John R. Dixon, Asst. Public Defender, Second Judicial Circuit, Tallahassee, for respondent/ appellee.

Opinion:
OVERTON, Justice.
We have for review Pride v. State, 603 So.2d 24 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), in which the district court addressed the same question we recently answered in State v. Johnson, 616 So.2d 1 (Fla.1993). In accordance with our decision in Johnson, we approve the decision of the district court in the instant case.
It is so ordered.
BARKETT, C.J., and McDONALD, SHAW, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.
. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(1), (3)-(4), Fla. Const.