Case Name: Tom WEISS, Employee/Appellant, v. AURORA BANK FSB, Employer/Respondent, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-09-18
Citations: 380 S.W.3d 612
Docket Number: No. ED 97730
Parties: Tom WEISS, Employee/Appellant, v. AURORA BANK FSB, Employer/Respondent, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 380
Pages: 612–613

Head Matter:
Tom WEISS, Employee/Appellant, v. AURORA BANK FSB, Employer/Respondent, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 97730.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Sept. 18, 2012.
Tom Weiss, Dardenne Praire, MO, Acting pro se, for Employee/Appellant.
Stuart H. Berkowitz, St. Louis, MO, for Employer/Respondent.
Robert A. Bedell, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent/Respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Tom Weiss appeals from the award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (the Commission) denying him unemployment benefits. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that there was sufficient competent and substantial evidence to support the Commission's award. Berwin v. Lindenwood Female College, 205 S.W.3d 291, 294 (Mo.App. E.D.2006). An extended opinion would have no prece- dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the decision pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).