Case Name: James F. DOOLEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent-Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1996-10-01
Citations: 930 S.W.2d 481
Docket Number: No. 70084
Parties: James F. DOOLEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent-Respondent.
Judges: Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 930
Pages: 481–481

Head Matter:
James F. DOOLEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent-Respondent.
No. 70084.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Oct. 1, 1996.
James F. Dooley, Pacific, pro se.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jef- ' ferson City, for respondent-respondent.
Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner Dooley appeals from the trial court's denial of his "NUNC PRO TUNC MOTION TO CORRECT THE ERRONEOUS PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORT AS SUBMITTED IN CASE NUMBER CR186-1508FX." The trial court found that it lacked jurisdiction to grant the relief requested. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).