Case Name: Joseph ROSENBLUM and Sadie Rosenblum, Copartners, Trading and Doing Business as Modern Manner Clothes, Petitioners, v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1951-11-29
Citations: 192 F.2d 392
Docket Number: No. 13, Docket 21959
Parties: Joseph ROSENBLUM and Sadie Rosen-blum, Copartners, Trading and Doing Business as Modern Manner Clothes, Petitioners, v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 192
Pages: 392–392

Head Matter:
Joseph ROSENBLUM and Sadie Rosen-blum, Copartners, Trading and Doing Business as Modern Manner Clothes, Petitioners, v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Respondent.
No. 13, Docket 21959.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued Nov. 14, 1951.
Decided Nov. 29, 1951.
Copal Mintz, New York City, for petitioners.
W. T. Kelley, Gen. Counsel, James W. Cassedy, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Alan B. Hobbes, all of Washington, D. C., for the Federal Trade 'Commission.
Before AUGUSTUS N. HAND, CHASE and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER -CURIAM.
Affirmed on authority of Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Education Society, 302 U.S. 112,58 S.Ct. 113, 82 L.Ed. 141; Progress Tailoring Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, 7 Cir., 153 F.2d 103; and Charles of the Ritz ' Distributors Corp. v. Federal Trade Commission, 2d Cir., 143 F.2d 676.