Case Name: Weinland v. Fulton, Secretary of State
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1918-09-10
Citations: 99 Ohio St. 10
Docket Number: No. 16071
Parties: Weinland v. Fulton, Secretary of State.
Judges: Nichols, C. J., Wanamaker, Newman, Jones, Matthias, Johnson and Donahue, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, New Service
Volume: 99
Pages: 10–10

Head Matter:
Weinland v. Fulton, Secretary of State.
Constitutional law — Validity of amendment — Cannot be determined in injunction proceeding < — To restrain submission to electors, when.
(No. 16071
Decided September 10, 1918.)
Error to the Court of Appeals of Franklin county.
Mr. Frank Davis, Jr., for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Joseph McGhee, attorney general; Mr. P. E. Dempsey; Mr. Timothy S. Hogan; Mr. Judson Harmon and Mr. A. J. Freiberg, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
By the Court.
In an action to enjoin the Secretary of State from submitting for the approval or rejection of the electors a constitutional amendment proposed by petition in pursuance of the provisions of Section 1 and Section 1a of Article II of the Constitution of Ohio, a court can not consider or determine whether such proposed amendment is in conflict with the Constitution of the United States. (Pfeifer et al. v. Graves, Secretary of State, 88 Ohio St., 473, approved and followed.)
Judgment affirmed.
Nichols, C. J., Wanamaker, Newman, Jones, Matthias, Johnson and Donahue, JJ., concur.