Case Name: In the Matter of John J. Santucci, as District Attorney, Queens County, Appellant, v. Cosmo J. Di Tucci, as Justice of the Supreme Court, Queens County, et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1986-11-25
Citations: 124 A.D.2d 850
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of John J. Santucci, as District Attorney, Queens County, Appellant, v Cosmo J. Di Tucci, as Justice of the Supreme Court, Queens County, et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 124
Pages: 850–850

Head Matter:
(November 25, 1986)
In the Matter of John J. Santucci, as District Attorney, Queens County, Appellant, v Cosmo J. Di Tucci, as Justice of the Supreme Court, Queens County, et al., Respondents.

Opinion:
The respondent Trial Justice of the Supreme Court was exercising his discretion in his control of the calendar. Rubin, J. P., Lawrence, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur. [See, People v Garnes, 134 Misc 2d 39.]