Case Name: Gammage v. The State
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1930-03-05
Citations: 41 Ga. App. 285
Docket Number: 20205
Parties: Gammage v. The State.
Judges: Broyles, C. J., and Jjuke, J., concur.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 41
Pages: 285–285

Head Matter:
20205.
Gammage v. The State.
Decided March 5, 1930.
W. T. Lane, John A. Fork, for plaintiff in error.
T. O. Marshall, solicitor, contra.

Opinion:
Bloodworth, J.
The defendant was convicted on circumstantial evidence; the jury, by their verdict, said that the evidence excluded every reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused; and the trial judge approved their verdict. This court can not say that the motion for a new trial, based on the general grounds only, was improperly overruled.
Judgment affirmed.
Broyles, C. J., and Jjuke, J., concur.