Case Name: Dorothy CLARK, Petitioner, v. Ralph FLOYD and Ethel Floyd, Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1965-12-15
Citations: 181 So. 2d 345
Docket Number: No. 34461
Parties: Dorothy CLARK, Petitioner, v. Ralph FLOYD and Ethel Floyd, Respondents.
Judges: THORNAL, C. J., DREW, O’CONNELL and HOBSON (Ret.), JJ., and JOHNSON, District Court Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 181
Pages: 345–345

Head Matter:
Dorothy CLARK, Petitioner, v. Ralph FLOYD and Ethel Floyd, Respondents.
No. 34461.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Dec. 15, 1965.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 19, 1966.
Carl O. Dunbar, Jr., Dunedin, for petitioner.
Waldense D. Malouf, Clearwater, for ■respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have before us for our consideration and détermination a petition for a writ of certiorari, directed to the District Court of Appeal, Second District, predicated upon the theory of a conflict in decisions.
After having listened attentively to the arguments of counsel for the respective parties litigant, having studied the briefs filed herein and having examined the challenged order, we have concluded that the petition for a writ of certiorari should be denied.
It is so ordered.
THORNAL, C. J., DREW, O'CONNELL and HOBSON (Ret.), JJ., and JOHNSON, District Court Judge, concur.