Case Name: In re Harvey M. NUSBAUM, Respondent
Court: District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Decision Date: 2014-05-01
Citations: 89 A.3d 1064
Docket Number: No. 12-BG-219
Parties: In re Harvey M. NUSBAUM, Respondent.
Judges: BEFORE: THOMPSON, Associate Judge, and PRYOR and NEBEKER, Senior Judges.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 89
Pages: 1064–1064

Head Matter:
In re Harvey M. NUSBAUM, Respondent.
No. 12-BG-219.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Filed May 1, 2014.
BEFORE: THOMPSON, Associate Judge, and PRYOR and NEBEKER, Senior Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
On consideration of the certified order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland disbarring respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction, see Attorney Grievance Com'n of Maryland v. Nusbaum, 436 Md. 609, 84 A.3d 98 (2014), this court's March 5, 2014, order lifting the previously entered stay and directing respondent to show cause why the reciprocal discipline of disbarment should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file a response to this court's order to show cause or the affidavit as required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is
ORDERED that Harvey M. Nusbaum is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C.2010), and In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007) (re-buttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate). It is
FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent's period of disbarment will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g).