Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Waytis PENDERGRASS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-05-28
Citations: 35 F. App'x 376
Docket Number: No. 02-6500
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Waytis PENDERGRASS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 35
Pages: 376–376

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Waytis PENDERGRASS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-6500.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 16, 2002.
Decided May 28, 2002.
Waytis Pendergrass, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Gordon Baker, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Waytis Pendergrass seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion to reconsider the denial of relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Pendergrass, Nos. CR-92-216; CA-01-2738-4-22 (D.S.C. filed Dec. 5, 2001; entered Dec. 6, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.