Case Name: Victor M. ALVAREZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-12-14
Citations: 158 F. App'x 858
Docket Number: No. 04-75684
Parties: Victor M. ALVAREZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: GOODWIN, W. FLETCHER, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 158
Pages: 858–859

Head Matter:
Victor M. ALVAREZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 04-75684.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 5, 2005.
Decided Dec. 14, 2005.
Monica N. Ganjoo, Esq., Ganjoo Law Office, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.
Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief General Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, San Francisco, CA, Cindy S. Ferrier, Esq., DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: GOODWIN, W. FLETCHER, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Victor M. Alvarez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' decision summarily affirming an immigration judge's order denying his application for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review the discretionary determination that Alvarez failed to establish exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying relative. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 929-30 (9th Cir.2005).
The voluntary departure period was stayed, and that stay will expire upon issuance of the mandate. See Desta v. Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 741, 750 (9th Cir.2004).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.