Case Name: DAON CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Ruth BLANKENSTEIN, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1984-01-31
Citations: 444 So. 2d 85
Docket Number: Nos. 83-105, 83-182
Parties: DAON CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Ruth BLANKENSTEIN, Appellee.
Judges: Before HENDRY, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 444
Pages: 85–86

Head Matter:
DAON CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Ruth BLANKENSTEIN, Appellee.
Nos. 83-105, 83-182.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan. 31, 1984.
Talburt, Kubicki & Bradley and Betsy E. Hartley, Miami, for appellant.
Fowler, White, Burnett, Hurley, Banick & Strickroot and Kathleen M. Williams and Michael J. Murphy, Miami, for appellee.
Before HENDRY, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM,
The nature and effect of the order granting the plaintiff's motion for mistrial was to grant a new trial. See A & P Bakery & Equipment Co. v. H. Hexter & Son, Inc., 149 So.2d 883 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963). The trial court's order did not specify the grounds upon which the new trial was granted, as required by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.530(f). We therefore relinquish jurisdiction to the trial court for the entry of an order stating the reasons for granting the new trial. See Wackenhut Corp. v. Canty, 359 So.2d 430 (Fla.1978); Rodewald v. Lawton, 394 So.2d 1143 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).
Remanded for further proceedings.