Case Name: Adele Nestel, et vir., and Louis P. Nestel, Individually, v. City of Miami
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1940-02-23
Citations: 141 Fla. 896
Docket Number: 
Parties: Adele Nestel, et vir., and Louis P. Nestel, Individually, v. City of Miami.
Judges: Whitfield, P. J., Chapman and Thomas, J. J., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 141
Pages: 896–898

Head Matter:
Adele Nestel, et vir., and Louis P. Nestel, Individually, v. City of Miami.
194 So. 248
Opinion Filed February 23, 1940
Morehead, & Fallot and David Lemelman, for Plaintiffs in Error;
Lezvis Tzvyman, for Defendant in Error.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This case is before the Court on writ of error to a final judgment on demurrer to the second amended declaration entered by the lower court in favor of the City of Miami. From this final judgment plaintiff below has perfected her appeal to this Court and the case is here for review.
The sole question to be decided by this Court is whether or not the allegations of the second amended declaration are sufficient to withstand the attack as made by the several grounds appearing in the demurrer.
The case has been submitted to this Court on the briefs of counsel for the respective parties, oral argument having been waived, and the Court having considered the amended declaration, and the grounds of the demurrer directed there to, and briefs and authorities cited having been examined, the Court is of the opinion that the lower court erred in sustaining the demurrer and entering final judgment thereon for the defendant below. See Jones v. City of Pensacola, 58 Fla. 208, 50 So. 874.
The judgment appealed from is hereby reversed.
Whitfield, P. J., Chapman and Thomas, J. J., concur.
Brown, J., concurs in part and dissents in part.
Terrell, C. J., and Buford, J., dissent.