Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DWAYNE JOHNSON, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1993-04-21
Citations: 119 Or. App. 494
Docket Number: 91-832-C-1; CA A71401
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DWAYNE JOHNSON, Appellant.
Judges: Before Richardson, Chief Judge, and Deits and Durham, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 119
Pages: 494–495

Head Matter:
On respondent’s motion for reconsideration filed February 1,
reconsideration allowed; opinion (117 Or App 531,842 P2d 819) modified and adhered to as modified April 21, 1993
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DWAYNE JOHNSON, Appellant.
(91-832-C-1; CA A71401)
849 P2d 1160
Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, for motion.
Before Richardson, Chief Judge, and Deits and Durham, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
The state moves for reconsideration of our opinion, State v. Johnson (A71401), 117 Or App 531, 842 P2d 819 (1992), and contends that we incorrectly stated its concession. We said that the state had conceded that the trial court erred "in imposing an indeterminate sentence under the dangerous offender statute." As the state points out, it conceded only that the 15-year minimum determinate term was erroneous, because it exceeded the presumptive sentence prescribed by ORS 161.737(2).
We allow the motion for reconsideration to correct the statement of the state's concession. However, the case must be remanded for resentencing under State v. Davis, 315 Or 484, 847 P2d 834 (1993).
Reconsideration allowed; opinion modified and adhered to as modified.