Case Name: GRAND LODGE COLORED KNIGHTS OF PYTHIAS OF TEXAS v. ADAMS
Court: Supreme Court of Texas
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1937-07-14
Citations: 107 S.W.2d 355
Docket Number: No. 22900
Parties: GRAND LODGE COLORED KNIGHTS OF PYTHIAS OF TEXAS v. ADAMS.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 107
Pages: 355–356

Head Matter:
GRAND LODGE COLORED KNIGHTS OF PYTHIAS OF TEXAS v. ADAMS.
No. 22900.
Supreme Court of Texas.
July 14, 1937.
For former opinion, see 105 S.W.(2d) 731.
Allan V. McDonnell, of Waco, for plaintiff in error.
F. M. Fitzpatrick, of Waco, -for defendant in error.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals in this case is reported in 105 S.W.(2d) 731.
The application for writ of error is dismissed for want of jurisdiction, because it does not comply with subdivision (d) of rale No. 1 of the rules governing procedure in the Supreme Court, effective January 1, 1931 (121 Tex. 745), which requires the ap plication to show that a motion for rehearing was filed in the Court of Civil Appeals presenting the complaints upon which the writ is asked. The Supreme Court has no jurisdiction to consider applications for writs of error not complying with the rule. Leonard Bros. v. Newton (Tex.Com.App.) 101 S.W. (2d) 223; Knodel v. Equitable Life Ins. Co. (Tex.Com.App.) 221 S.W. 941; Employers' Cas. Co. v. Roland (Tex.Com.App.) 1 S.W. (2d) 568; Blackmon v. Trail (Tex.Com.App.) 12 S.W. (2d)- 967.