Case Name: Bruce Barnes et al., Appellants, v. Cathers and Dembrosky et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2004-03-02
Citations: 5 A.D.3d 122
Docket Number: 
Parties: Bruce Barnes et al., Appellants, v Cathers and Dembrosky et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 5
Pages: 122–122

Head Matter:
Bruce Barnes et al., Appellants, v Cathers and Dembrosky et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.
[771 NYS2d 895]

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.), entered September 24, 2003, which denied plaintiffs' motion to consolidate this action with another action pending in New York County, entitled Cathers v Barnes (Index No. 600214/02), unanimously affirmed, with costs.
The two actions are at completely different stages of discovery. Consolidation would result in undue delay in the resolution of the Cathers action (see Abrams v Port Auth. Trans-Hudson Corp., 1 AD3d 118 [2003]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan and Friedman, JJ.