Case Name: Tracy WEBB, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KAISER, (Fremont); et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-12-17
Citations: 627 F. App'x 625
Docket Number: No. 14-15882
Parties: Tracy WEBB, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KAISER, (Fremont); et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: WALLACE, RAWLINSON, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges;
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 627
Pages: 625–625

Head Matter:
Tracy WEBB, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KAISER, (Fremont); et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 14-15882.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 9, 2015.
Filed Dec. 17, 2015.
Tracy Webb, Newark, CA, pro se.
Before: WALLACE, RAWLINSON, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges;
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Tracy Webb appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing her action alleging, among other things, sex and racial discrimination. We review de novo. Watison v. Carter, 668 F.3d 1108, 1112 (9th Cir.2012) (dismissal for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)); Brady v. United States, 211 F.3d 499, 502 (9th Cir.2000) (dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction). We affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Webb's action because Webb failed to allege facts establishing federal subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1331, 1332 (requirements for federal subject matter jurisdiction); see also Provincial Gov't of Marinduque v. Placer Dome, Inc., 582 F.3d 1083, 1086 (9th Cir.2009) (discussing requirements for federal question jurisdiction under § 1331).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.