Case Name: Simon Lorne et al., Respondents, v. 50 Madison Avenue LLC et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants; 50 Madison Avenue LLC et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. RCDolner LLC, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant, and Commodore Construction Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent, et al., Third-Party Defendants; RCDolner LLC, Fourth-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Olympic Plumbing & Heating Corp. et al., Fourth-Party Defendants-Respondents, et al., Fourth-Party Defendants. (And a Third-Party Action.)
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2010-05-25
Citations: 73 A.D.3d 621
Docket Number: 
Parties: Simon Lorne et al., Respondents, v 50 Madison Avenue LLC et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants. 50 Madison Avenue LLC et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, v RCDolner LLC, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant, and Commodore Construction Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent, et al., Third-Party Defendants. RCDolner LLC, Fourth-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v Olympic Plumbing & Heating Corp. et al., Fourth-Party Defendants-Respondents, et al., Fourth-Party Defendants. (And a Third-Party Action.)
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 73
Pages: 621–621

Head Matter:
Simon Lorne et al., Respondents, v 50 Madison Avenue LLC et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants. 50 Madison Avenue LLC et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, v RCDolner LLC, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant, and Commodore Construction Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent, et al., Third-Party Defendants. RCDolner LLC, Fourth-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v Olympic Plumbing & Heating Corp. et al., Fourth-Party Defendants-Respondents, et al., Fourth-Party Defendants. (And a Third-Party Action.)
[900 NYS2d 861]

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Jane Goodman, J.), entered July 6, 2009, which granted plaintiffs' motion as well as motions and a cross motion by certain third- and fourth-party defendants for an order severing the third- and fourth-party actions from the main action, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Plaintiff purchasers alleged, inter aha, breach of a condominium purchase/sale agreement and its attendant warranties. The third- and fourth-party actions involved sponsor/general contractor claims against contractors and subcontractors for liability/indemnification arising from allegedly defective workmanship and design. Severance of claims (CPLR 603) was a proper exercise of judicial discretion here, since the sponsor and property manager essentially admitted the existence of alleged material defects in the flooring of plaintiffs' unit. We note that a substantial period of delay was occasioned by the merit-less motion to dismiss made by defendants 50 Madison and Samson. Plaintiffs would be prejudiced by burdensome discovery in connection with the 13 additional parties representing the allegedly negligent contractors and subcontractors. While the claims of defective workmanship and design in the main action are shared in the third- and fourth-party actions, there appears to be little likelihood of inconsistent judgments where the sponsor and property manager have effectively acknowledged that these defects were responsible for plaintiffs' displacement. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Saxe, McGuire, Moskowitz and Freedman, JJ.