Case Name: In the Interest of D.S., B.S., and A.S., Minors
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-02-25
Citations: 103 S.W.3d 272
Docket Number: Nos. ED 81513, ED 81514, ED 81515
Parties: In the Interest of D.S., B.S., and A.S., Minors.
Judges: Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, C.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and ROBERT E. CRIST, SR. J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 103
Pages: 272–272

Head Matter:
In the Interest of D.S., B.S., and A.S., Minors.
Nos. ED 81513, ED 81514, ED 81515.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Feb. 25, 2003.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 10, 2003.
Application for Transfer Denied May 27, 2003.
Benicia Baker-Livorsi, St. Charles, MO, for appellant.
John J. Smith, St. Charles, MO, for respondent.
William N. Seibel, Jr., St. Charles, MO, Guardian Ad Litem.
Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, C.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and ROBERT E. CRIST, SR. J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
V.M. (Mother) is the natural mother of three children, D.S., B.S., and A.S. (collectively "Children"). She appeals from three separate judgments that terminated her parental rights to the Children. We have consolidated those appeals.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). Further, no error of law or otherwise appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).