Case Name: WIEDMAN, Respondent, v. KINZLY, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1912-05-01
Citations: 135 N.Y.S. 1150
Docket Number: 
Parties: WIEDMAN, Respondent, v. KINZLY, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 135
Pages: 1150–1150

Head Matter:
WIEDMAN, Respondent, v. KINZLY, Appellant.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
May 1, 1912.)
Action by Edward Wiedman, an infant, etc., against Frank Kinzly.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Judgment and order reversed, and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that the court committed prejudicial error in excluding the testimony of the chief of police, tending to show that the defendant had been directed to disperse people congregating on street corners, and in view of the charge of the court on the subject of malice this error is so prejudicial as to require a reversal.