Case Name: PROSOURCE SERVICES CORPORATION, Appellant, v. THOMAS GROUP, INC., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1997-02-05
Citations: 687 So. 2d 75
Docket Number: No. 96-2579
Parties: PROSOURCE SERVICES CORPORATION, Appellant, v. THOMAS GROUP, INC., Appellee.
Judges: Before JORGENSON and SHEVIN, JJ., and BARKDULL, Senior Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 687
Pages: 75–75

Head Matter:
PROSOURCE SERVICES CORPORATION, Appellant, v. THOMAS GROUP, INC., Appellee.
No. 96-2579.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 5, 1997.
Holland & Knight and Susan H. Aprill and Judith M. Mercier and James D. Wing, Miami, for appellant.
Mark A. Cohen and Fred 0. Goldberg, Miami, for appellee.
Before JORGENSON and SHEVIN, JJ., and BARKDULL, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. v. Universal Employment Agency, 664 So.2d 1107, 1108 (Fla. 3d DCA1995)(dispute that has "its 'origin or genesis in the contract,' and was both 'directly related to, and . would not have occurred but for' the relationship it established" subject to arbitration); Fowler v. Watts, 659 So.2d 374 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)(where subsequent superseding agreement does not include arbitration clause order compelling arbitration reversed); Trinchitella v. D.R.F., Inc., 584 So.2d 35 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)(same).