Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alex NEGRETE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-12-16
Citations: 671 F. App'x 769
Docket Number: No. 16-11018 Non-Argument Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alex NEGRETE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before HULL, WILSON and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 671
Pages: 769–770

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alex NEGRETE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-11018 Non-Argument Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Date Filed: 12/16/2016
Robert J. Brady, Jr., Wifredo A. Ferrer, Emily M. Smachetti, Nalina Sombuntham, U.S. Attorney’s Office, MIAMI, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Alex Negrete, Pro Se
Before HULL, WILSON and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Scott Sakin, appointed counsel for Alex Negrete in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L,Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Negrete's conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.