Case Name: James Kettle, Appellant, v. John Turl et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Common Pleas
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1895
Citations: 14 Misc. 637
Docket Number: 
Parties: James Kettle, Appellant, v. John Turl et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 14
Pages: 637–637

Head Matter:
James Kettle, Appellant, v. John Turl et al., Respondents.
Motion for resettlement of .case.
George II. Hart and John H. Whitmg, for motion."
W. W. Niles, opposed.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Motion for resettlement of case. After argument and decision of an appeal it is too late for the defeated party to apply for a resettlement of the case in order to obtain a different statement of facts upon the 'record by the insertion of questions and answers which he deemed immaterial in making up his case, and which for the first time appear material to him after an adverse decision. . It might, be different if the proposed amendment were in support of a judgment, and where matter was improperly inserted or omitted by the "other party to the' controversy.
Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
Present: Daly, Ch. J., Bischofe and Pbyob, JJ.
Motion denied, with ten dollars costs: