Case Name: Paulette ECHOLS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CANON U.S.A., INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-03-16
Citations: 416 F. App'x 289
Docket Number: No. 10-1822
Parties: Paulette ECHOLS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CANON U.S.A., INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 416
Pages: 289–289

Head Matter:
Paulette ECHOLS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CANON U.S.A., INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 10-1822.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 24, 2011.
Decided: March 16, 2011.
Paulette Echols, Appellant Pro Se. Virginia E. Robinson, John Francis Scalia, Matthew Harrold Sorensen, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, McLean, VA, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Paulette Echols appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellee on her claims of racial and age discrimination and retaliation. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.