Case Name: DURYEA, Respondent, v. MACKEY et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1893-12-01
Citations: 26 N.Y.S. 1120
Docket Number: 
Parties: DURYEA, Respondent, v. MACKEY et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 26
Pages: 1120–1120

Head Matter:
DURYEA, Respondent, v. MACKEY et al., Appellants.
(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department.
December 1, 1893.)
Action by George Duryea against John Mackey and others.
J. M. & T. B. Seaman, for appellant John Mackey.
Nathan Comstock, for appellants Jacob Mackey and Freelove Lewis.
E. T. Payne, (Oscar Frisbie, of counsel,) for respondent.

Opinion:
PRATT, J.
There can be no question of the justice of the decree appealed from. The plaintiff advanced the money with the knowledge and consent of the defendants. It was used for their benefit, and they still enjoy the advantages by it procured. As remarked by the trial judge, they are in no-position to dispute the validity of the loan. Judgment affirmed, with costs.