Case Name: FLAMINGO HAULING & RIGGING COMPANY, INC., Petitioner, v. William H. BEVIS et al., Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1973-07-11
Citations: 280 So. 2d 426
Docket Number: No. 43069
Parties: FLAMINGO HAULING & RIGGING COMPANY, INC., Petitioner, v. William H. BEVIS et al., Respondents.
Judges: CARLTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 280
Pages: 426–426

Head Matter:
FLAMINGO HAULING & RIGGING COMPANY, INC., Petitioner, v. William H. BEVIS et al., Respondents.
No. 43069.
Supreme Court of Florida.
July 11, 1973.
David B. Erwin, of Mason & Erwin, Tallahassee, for petitioner.
Prentice P. Pruitt and L. Keith Pafford, Tallahassee, for Florida Public Service Commission, and M. Craig Massey of Langston & Massey, Lakeland, for Walker Contract Carrier, Inc., respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Our careful consideration and analysis of the petition, the record, briefs and arguments of counsel sustain the view that the findings of the Commission are supported by competent substantial evidence and that, in entering its order, Respondent Commission met the essential requirements of law.
Accordingly, the petition for writ of cer-tiorari is
Denied.
It is so ordered.
CARLTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.