Case Name: Roger Lee DEAL, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. G. Robert HICKS, III; Michael W. Casey; John R. Smith, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-08-02
Citations: 441 F. App'x 978
Docket Number: No. 11-6507
Parties: Roger Lee DEAL, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. G. Robert HICKS, III; Michael W. Casey; John R. Smith, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 441
Pages: 978–979

Head Matter:
Roger Lee DEAL, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. G. Robert HICKS, III; Michael W. Casey; John R. Smith, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 11-6507.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 28, 2011.
Decided: Aug. 2, 2011.
Roger Lee Deal, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Roger Lee Deal, Sr., appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Deal v. Hicks, No. 5:10-ct-03195-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 5, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.