Case Name: MAULDING et al v. ADAMS et al
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1966-02-16
Citations: 242 Or. 616
Docket Number: 
Parties: MAULDING et al v. ADAMS et al
Judges: Before McAllister, Chief Justice, and Goodwin, Denecke, Holman and Lusk, Justices.
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 242
Pages: 616–617

Head Matter:
Argued February 4,
affirmed February 16, 1966
MAULDING et al v. ADAMS et al
410 P. 2d 1023
Ernest M. Jachetta, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief was George L. Evans, Portland.
Donald H. Joyce, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Herman W. Winter, Heppner.
Before McAllister, Chief Justice, and Goodwin, Denecke, Holman and Lusk, Justices.
Denecke, J., did not participate in this decision.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment in favor of defendants in an action for damages for misrepresentation in the sale of a house and lot. The cause was tried by the court without a jury and the court found that the alleged misrepresentations had not been made.
Our examination of the record found evidence to support the trial court's findings. The question was one of fact.
Affirmed.