Case Name: In the Matter of the Application of Max Handel, Respondent, for a Certiorari Order against William E. Walsh and Others, Constituting the Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1929-10
Citations: 227 A.D. 738
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Application of Max Handel, Respondent, for a Certiorari Order against William E. Walsh and Others, Constituting the Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 227
Pages: 738–739

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Application of Max Handel, Respondent, for a Certiorari Order against William E. Walsh and Others, Constituting the Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York, Appellants.

Opinion:
Order reversed upon the law and the facts, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements, certiorari proceeding dismissed and determination of the board of standards and appeals reinstated and confirmed. There is no proof in the record of unnecessary hardship under the provisions of section 21 (Art. V) of the Amended Building Zone Resolution, nor of abuse of discretion under section 7 (e) (Art. II) thereof. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Seeger and Carswell, JJ., concur.