Case Name: Carol A. Sigmond, Respondent, v. Board of Managers of Parc Vendome Condominium, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2012-10-16
Citations: 99 A.D.3d 554
Docket Number: 
Parties: Carol A. Sigmond, Respondent, v Board of Managers of Parc Vendome Condominium, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 99
Pages: 554–554

Head Matter:
Carol A. Sigmond, Respondent, v Board of Managers of Parc Vendome Condominium, Appellant.
[951 NYS2d 873]

Opinion:
The court properly quashed the subpoenas served by respondent on nonparty Bright Horizons because the parties did not stipulate to conduct discovery of Bright Horizons (see CPLR 3102 [b], [c]; compare Textron, Inc. v Unisys Corp., 138 Misc 2d 124, 126 [Sup Ct, NY County 1987]; Matter of ACE Am. Ins. Co., 6 Misc 3d 1005[A], 2004 NY Slip Op 51732[U] [Sup Ct, NY County 2004]).
We have considered respondent's remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Gonzalez, EJ., Sweeny, Acosta, Renwick and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.