Case Name: Allen Lee LAMPKIN, Appellant, v. STROMAN'S, INC., Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-01-18
Citations: 1 F. App'x 596
Docket Number: No. 00-2577
Parties: Allen Lee LAMPKIN, Appellant, v. STROMAN’S, INC., Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 1
Pages: 596–596

Head Matter:
Allen Lee LAMPKIN, Appellant, v. STROMAN’S, INC., Appellee.
No. 00-2577.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 12, 2001.
Decided Jan. 18, 2001.
Before BOWMAN, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Allen Lampkin appeals from the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment in his employment discrimination lawsuit against his former employer. Upon de novo review, we agree with the district court, for the reasons expressed in its order, that Lampkin failed to demonstrate Stroman's stated reasons for his termination were a pretext for discrimination, or Stroman's engaged in retaliatory behavior. See Whitley v. Peer Review Systems, Inc., 221 F.3d 1053, 1055 (8th Cir.2000).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny Stroman's pending motions on appeal.
. The Honorable G. Thomas Eisele, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.