Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Virgil A. STALLONE, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-09-04
Citations: 376 S.W.3d 705
Docket Number: No. ED 97097
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Virgil A. STALLONE, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., C.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 376
Pages: 705–706

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Virgil A. STALLONE, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 97097.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Sept. 4, 2012.
Rosalynn Koch, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Timothy Allan Blackwell, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., C.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Virgil A. Stallone (Defendant) appeals from the judgment upon his convictions by a jury for two counts of first-degree statutory sodomy, in violation of Section 566.062, RSMo 2000; two counts of first-degree child molestation, in violation of Section 566.067; one count of second-degree child molestation, in violation of Section 566.068; and two counts of first-degree sexual misconduct, in violation of Section 566.090, for which he was sentenced to concurrent terms of twenty-five years' imprisonment for each sodomy count, fifteen-years' imprisonment for each molestation count, and one-year imprisonment for the sexual misconduct count, with all sentences to run concurrently. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
. Unless otherwise indicated, all further statutory references are to RSMo 2000.