Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darryl Ramone GOODLEY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-11-11
Citations: 544 F. App'x 590
Docket Number: No. 12-51079
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darryl Ramone GOODLEY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 544
Pages: 590–591

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darryl Ramone GOODLEY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-51079
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Nov. 11, 2013.
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
John L. Pool, Andrews, TX, for Defen-danh-Appellant.
Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Darryl Ramone Goodley has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Good-ley has not filed a response. Although Goodley remains subject to a term of supervised release, as counsel notes, he has completed the term of imprisonment imposed upon the revocation of his supervised release. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as frivolous, see 5th Cir. R. 42.2, and in part as moot, see Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7, 118 S.Ct. 978, 140 L.Ed.2d 43 (1998).
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.