Case Name: John S. SORENSON and T. S. B. Nielsen, Copartners Trading under the Firm Name and Style of Sorenson & Nielsen, Appellants, v. BELTS WHARF WAREHOUSE, Inc., Curtis Bay Towing Company, and Monarch Stevedore Company, Appellees; J. ARON & COMPANY, Inc., on Behalf of Itself and of Its Automobile Insurance Company, Intervening Petitioner, Appellant, v. BELTS WHARF WAREHOUSE, Inc., Curtis Bay Towing Company and Monarch Stevedore Company, Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1926-01-15
Citations: 9 F.2d 1021
Docket Number: Nos. 2405, 2406
Parties: John S. SORENSON and T. S. B. Nielsen, Copartners Trading under the Firm Name and Style of Sorenson & Nielsen, Appellants, v. BELTS WHARF WAREHOUSE, Inc., Curtis Bay Towing Company, and Monarch Stevedore Company, Appellees. J. ARON & COMPANY, Inc., on Behalf of Itself and of Its Automobile Insurance Company, Intervening Petitioner, Appellant, v. BELTS WHARF WAREHOUSE, Inc., Curtis Bay Towing Company and Monarch Stevedore Company, Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 9
Pages: 1021–1021

Head Matter:
John S. SORENSON and T. S. B. Nielsen, Copartners Trading under the Firm Name and Style of Sorenson & Nielsen, Appellants, v. BELTS WHARF WAREHOUSE, Inc., Curtis Bay Towing Company, and Monarch Stevedore Company, Appellees. J. ARON & COMPANY, Inc., on Behalf of Itself and of Its Automobile Insurance Company, Intervening Petitioner, Appellant, v. BELTS WHARF WAREHOUSE, Inc., Curtis Bay Towing Company and Monarch Stevedore Company, Appellees.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
January 15, 1926.)
Nos. 2405, 2406.
Frank B. Ober and Stuart S. Janney, both of Baltimore, Md. (Janney, Ober, Slingluff & Williams, of Baltimore, Md., and Bigham, Englar & Jones, of New York City, on the brief), for appellants.
L. Vernon Miller and Frank Gosnell, both of Baltimore, Md. (Marbury, Gosnell & Williams, of Baltimore, Md., on the brief), for appellees.
Before ROSE and PARKER, Circuit Judges, and WATKINS, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
These appeals bring up for review no questions of law. They turn upon matters of fact, or upon what are the inferences properly to he drawn from facts admitted or supposed to be proved. Wo have examined the record, and are satisfied with the conclusion below.
Affirmed.