Case Name: Katy J. COELLO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-05-20
Citations: 649 F. App'x 300
Docket Number: No. 15-2370
Parties: Katy J. COELLO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 649
Pages: 300–300

Head Matter:
Katy J. COELLO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 15-2370.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 18, 2016.
Decided: May 20, 2016.
Katy J. Coello, Appellant Pro Se. Mark A. Bond, William J. Wilkins, Elizabeth G. Chirich, Internal Revenue Service, Washington, D.C.; Gilbert Steven Rothenberg, Senior Attorney, Michael J. Haungs, Supervisory Attorney, Caroline D. Ciraolo, Douglas Campbell Rennie, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Katy J. Coello appeals the tax court's order dismissing her petition for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. Coello v. Comm'r, Tax Ct. No. 001954-15 L (U.S. Tax Ct. Aug. 21, 2015). We grant Coello's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.