Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kavin Datron WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-02-28
Citations: 678 F. App'x 144
Docket Number: No. 16-7457
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kavin Datron WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 678
Pages: 144–144

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kavin Datron WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-7457
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: February 23, 2017
Decided: February 28, 2017
Kavin Datron Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Shailika S. Kotiya, William Glenn Perry, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kavin Datron Williams appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction. Based on our review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion based on &e risk Williams poses to public safety. See United States v. Smalls, 720 F.3d 193, 195 (4th Cir. 2013) ("Whether to reduce a sentence-and to what extent is a matter within the district court's discretion.") Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Williams, No. 4:10-cr-00088-D-1 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 7, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED