Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Oscar Jaime GARZA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-04-11
Citations: 176 F. App'x 449
Docket Number: No. 05-50149
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Oscar Jaime GARZA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 176
Pages: 449–450

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Oscar Jaime GARZA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-50149.
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Decided April 11, 2006.
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Oscar Jaime Garza, Bastrop, TX, pro se.
Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Oscar Jaime Garza, federal prisoner #30078-180, appeals the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion challenging his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana. He argues that the district court violated his Sixth Amendment rights by imposing a sentence based on the court's findings that the offense involved more marijuana than he admitted in his factual basis and that he was a leader or organizer in the offense. He argues that his sentence should be vacated in view of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). The district court granted a certificate of appealability on the issue "[wjhether the holding in Booker applies retroactively to a § 2255 collateral attack of a sentence." We have now held that Booker is not retroactively applicable to an initial § 2255 motion. United States v. Gentry, 432 F.3d 600, 604-05 (5th Cir.2005). Accordingly, the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.