Case Name: William FOX, Appellant, v. Ronald JONES, et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1984-02-29
Citations: 446 So. 2d 1127
Docket Number: No. 82-1895
Parties: William FOX, Appellant, v. Ronald JONES, et al., Appellees.
Judges: DOWNEY, LETTS and HERSEY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 446
Pages: 1127–1127

Head Matter:
William FOX, Appellant, v. Ronald JONES, et al., Appellees.
No. 82-1895.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb. 29, 1984.
Rehearing Denied April 4, 1984.
Mark Krasnow, Miami, for appellant.
James M. Tuthill of Christiansen, Jacknin & Tuthill, West Palm Beach, for appellees —Christiansen, Jacknin & Myers, Jay R. Jacknin and James Rich.
Sherry L. Cooper of the Law Office of Charles R.L. White, Jupiter, for appellee— Charles R.L. White.
J. Burke Culler, Jr., of Adams, Coogler, Watson & Merkel, West Palm Beach, for appellee — Ronald E. Jones.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Despite inconsistencies between the complaint and exhibits attached to the complaint we are of the view that Count III states a cause of action. Thus, we reverse the final judgment with instructions to reinstate the action to this limited extent. We affirm dismissal of the other counts.
REVERSED IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART; REMANDED.
DOWNEY, LETTS and HERSEY, JJ., concur.