Case Name: Christopher SEPULVADO, Intervenor Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bobby JINDAL, Governor of Louisiana; James M. LeBlanc, Secretary, Department of Public Safety and Corrections; Burl Cain, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary; Angie Norwood, Warden, Death Row; Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections; John Does, Unknown Executioners, Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-12-23
Citations: 739 F.3d 716
Docket Number: No. 13-70007
Parties: Christopher SEPULVADO, Intervenor Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bobby JINDAL, Governor of Louisiana; James M. LeBlanc, Secretary, Department of Public Safety and Corrections; Burl Cain, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary; Angie Norwood, Warden, Death Row; Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections; John Does, Unknown Executioners, Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: Before STEWART, Chief Judge, SMITH and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 739
Pages: 716–723

Head Matter:
Christopher SEPULVADO, Intervenor Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bobby JINDAL, Governor of Louisiana; James M. LeBlanc, Secretary, Department of Public Safety and Corrections; Burl Cain, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary; Angie Norwood, Warden, Death Row; Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections; John Does, Unknown Executioners, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 13-70007.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 23, 2013.
Gary Patrick Clements, Counsel, Kathleen Ann Kelly, Esq., Capital Post — Conviction Project of Louisiana, New Orleans, LA, for Intervenor Plaintiff-Appellee.
Edmond Wade Shows, Shows, Cali, Ber-thelot & Walsh, L.L.P., Baton Rouge, LA, for Intervenor Plaintiff-Appellee and Defendant-Appellant.
Jacqueline Bordelon Wilson, Shows, Cali, Berthelot & Walsh, L.L.P., Baton Rouge, LA, for Defendants-Appellants.
Before STEWART, Chief Judge, SMITH and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
ON PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
The petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. The court having been polled at the request of one of its members, and a majority of the judges who are in regular active service and not disqualified not having voted in favor (Fed. R.App. P. 35 and 5th Cir. R. .35), the petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.
. In the en banc poll, 4 judges voted in favor of rehearing (Judges King, Dennis, Prado, and Graves), and 11 judges voted •against rehearing (Chief Judge Stewart and Judges Jolly, Davis, Jones, Smith, Clement, Owen, Elrod, South wick, Haynes, and Higginson).