Case Name: John F. CURRY, Jr., Appellant, v. Robert BRIODY, Executive Director, Florida Civil Commitment Center; Gregory Venz, Executive Director, Sexually Violent Predator Program, Department of Children and Family Services; Jerry Regier, Secretary, Department of Children and Family Services; and Liberty Behavioral Health Corporation, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2005-01-19
Citations: 892 So. 2d 1158
Docket Number: No. 2D04-600
Parties: John F. CURRY, Jr., Appellant, v. Robert BRIODY, Executive Director, Florida Civil Commitment Center; Gregory Venz, Executive Director, Sexually Violent Predator Program, Department of Children and Family Services; Jerry Regier, Secretary, Department of Children and Family Services; and Liberty Behavioral Health Corporation, Appellees.
Judges: STRINGER and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 892
Pages: 1158–1158

Head Matter:
John F. CURRY, Jr., Appellant, v. Robert BRIODY, Executive Director, Florida Civil Commitment Center; Gregory Venz, Executive Director, Sexually Violent Predator Program, Department of Children and Family Services; Jerry Regier, Secretary, Department of Children and Family Services; and Liberty Behavioral Health Corporation, Appellees.
No. 2D04-600.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Jan. 19, 2005.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 14, 2005.
John F. Curry, Jr., pro se.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Cecilia Bradley, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellees Jerry Regier, Secretary, Department of Children and Family Services, and Gregory Venz, Executive Director, Sexually Violent Predator Program, Department of Children and Family Services.
Jennifer R. Haymes, General Counsel, Florida Civil Commitment Center, Arcadia, for Appellees Robert Briody, Executive Director, Florida Civil Commitment Center, and Liberty Behavioral Health Corporation.

Opinion:
SALCINES, Judge.
John F. Curry, Jr. has filed a civil appeal from the denial of his petition for writ of mandamus. These matters are properly reviewed by petition for writ of certiorari. See Tedder v. Fla. Parole Comm'n, 842 So.2d 1022 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). Accordingly, this appeal is converted to a petition for writ of certiorari which is denied.
Petition for writ of certiorari denied.
STRINGER and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.