Case Name: WILLIAM B. CANFIELD, and others, Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. THE BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendants and Appellants
Court: New York Superior Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1877-11-05
Citations: 11 Jones & S. 562
Docket Number: 
Parties: WILLIAM B. CANFIELD, and others, Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. THE BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendants and Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Reports of cases argued and determined in the Superior Court of the city of New York
Volume: 43
Pages: 562–562

Head Matter:
WILLIAM B. CANFIELD, and others, Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. THE BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendants and Appellants.
Decided November 5, 1877.
Before Curtis, Ch.- J., Sanford and Freedman, JJ.
Appeal from a judgment and order denying motion for new trial.
The action was brought against the defendant as a common carrier, for the loss of certain goods shipped by plaintiff. Plaintiff had a verdict. Defendants appealed from the judgment entered on the verdict, and also from an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Hutchins & Platt, attorneys, Austin G. Fox and Waldo Hutchins, of counsel, for appellant.
Estes & Barnard, attorneys and of counsel, for respondent.

Opinion:
The Court,
without writing an opinion, affirmed the judgment and order.