Case Name: George PARKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1968-12-13
Citations: 216 So. 2d 476
Docket Number: No. 68-217
Parties: George PARKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ALLEN, Acting C. J., and HOBSON, J., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 216
Pages: 476–476

Head Matter:
George PARKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 68-217.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.
Dec. 13, 1968.
J. Irvin Walden, Sarasota, for appellant.
Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and William D. Roth, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

Opinion:
MANN, Judge.
Appellant claims that because one witness identified another man as the third participant in this armed robbery the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction. But another witness testified that he was one of the robbers, and the jury resolved the conflict in testimony against Parker.
Oral argument is dispensed with pursuant to F.A.R. 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A. as serving no useful purpose.
Affirmed.
ALLEN, Acting C. J., and HOBSON, J., concur.