Case Name: Sandra Dale VITEK, Appellant, v. Anthony J. VITEK, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-10-27
Citations: 661 So. 2d 965
Docket Number: No. 93-2947
Parties: Sandra Dale VITEK, Appellant, v. Anthony J. VITEK, Appellee.
Judges: DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 661
Pages: 965–967

Head Matter:
Sandra Dale VITEK, Appellant, v. Anthony J. VITEK, Appellee.
No. 93-2947.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Oct. 27, 1995.
Marcia K. Lippincott of Marcia K. Lippin-eott, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant.
Mark S. Peters of Amari, Theriae & Eisen-menger, P.A., Cocoa, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellant, Sandra Vitek, challenges the fairness of the trial court's final judgment of dissolution in regard to the equitable distribution of assets, the alimony award to her, and the denial of her request for an award of attorney's fees. We find no error in regard to the equitable distribution of assets or the denial of attorney's fees, but reverse and remand in respect to the alimony award since it is not supported by the requisite factual findings. See Moreno v. Moreno, 606 So.2d 1280 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992). A factor in the alimony award was the trial court's imputation of income to the wife; this finding also was improper in the absence of specific findings of fact supporting it. Kaminski v. Kaminski, 687 So.2d 284 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).
Accordingly, we reverse and remand for reconsideration by the court of the alimony award.
DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ., concur.
THOMPSON, J., concurs in part, dissents in part, with opinion.