Case Name: Disciplinary Counsel v. Margolis
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2010-03-04
Citations: 124 Ohio St. 3d 1220
Docket Number: No. 2006-2331
Parties: Disciplinary Counsel v. Margolis.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 124
Pages: 1220–1220

Head Matter:
Disciplinary Counsel v. Margolis.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Margolis, 124 Ohio St.3d 1220, 2010-Ohio-1049.]
(No. 2006-2331
Submitted February 25, 2010
Decided March 4, 2010.)

Opinion:
{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Loren Jonathan Margolis, Attorney Registration No. 0007957, last known business address in Cleveland, Ohio.
{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of July 18, 2007, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of two years, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,
{¶ 3} It is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.
{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.
{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Margolis, 114 Ohio St.3d 165, 2007-Ohio-3607, 870 N.E.2d 1158.
Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.