Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio Lamont NICHOLSON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-06-01
Citations: 651 F. App'x 191
Docket Number: No. 16-6241
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio Lamont NICHOLSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 651
Pages: 191–192

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio Lamont NICHOLSON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-6241
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 26, 2016
Decided: June 1, 2016
Antonio Lamont Nicholson, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Dickerson Kocher, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Antonio Lamont Nicholson appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Contrary to Nicholson's assertion on appeal, our decision in United States v. Williams, 808 F.3d 253 (4th Cir. 2015), does not apply. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Nicholson, No. 5:07-cr-00045-FL-1 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 25, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED