Case Name: Eleanor Ruth Himmelman, an Infant, by William Himmelman, Her Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Pechter Baking Co., Inc., Appellant; William Himmelman, Respondent, v. Pechter Baking Co., Inc., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1933-07
Citations: 240 A.D. 781
Docket Number: 
Parties: Eleanor Ruth Himmelman, an Infant, by William Himmelman, Her Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Pechter Baking Co., Inc., Appellant. William Himmelman, Respondent, v. Pechter Baking Co., Inc., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 240
Pages: 781–781

Head Matter:
Eleanor Ruth Himmelman, an Infant, by William Himmelman, Her Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Pechter Baking Co., Inc., Appellant. William Himmelman, Respondent, v. Pechter Baking Co., Inc., Appellant.
Appeal dismissed, 264 N. Y. 456.

Opinion:
Judgment reversed on the law and the facts and the complaint dismissed, with costs, upon the ground that the driving of the car by the boy Proshifsky was without the permission of the defendant's driver, and that the defendant was not rendered liable therefor under section 59 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper and Hagarty, JJ., concur; Scudder, J., not voting.