Case Name: Milena Rajkov et al., Appellants, v. Eli Lilly & Co. et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1995-12-18
Citations: 222 A.D.2d 569
Docket Number: 
Parties: Milena Rajkov et al., Appellants, v Eli Lilly & Co. et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 222
Pages: 569–569

Head Matter:
Milena Rajkov et al., Appellants, v Eli Lilly & Co. et al., Respondents.
[636 NYS2d 633]

Opinion:
—In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Robbins, J.), entered March 4, 1994, which denied their motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability and granted the defendants' cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff Milena Rajkov had not sustained a serious injury as defined by Insurance Law § 5102 (d).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the plaintiffs' contentions, the record fails to raise any triable issues of fact (see, CPLR 3212 [b]) that the plaintiff Milena Rajkov sustained a serious injury as defined by Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Sullivan, J. P., Thompson, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.