Case Name: Laura K. MECHEM, Debtor-Appellant, and Darlene G. Mechem, Debtor, v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Creditor-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-04-10
Citations: 471 F. App'x 128
Docket Number: No. 11-2017
Parties: Laura K. MECHEM, Debtor-Appellant, and Darlene G. Mechem, Debtor, v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Creditor-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Bankruptcy Reporter
Volume: 474
Pages: 128–129

Head Matter:
Laura K. MECHEM, Debtor-Appellant, and Darlene G. Mechem, Debtor, v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Creditor-Appellee.
No. 11-2017.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 29, 2012.
Decided: April 10, 2012.
Brian J. McAuliffe, Law Office of Brian J. McAuliffe, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellant. R. Terrance Rodgers, Guthrie & Thomas, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Laura K. Mechem appeals the district court's order denying her motion for rehearing or reconsideration of the district court's order reversing the portion of the bankruptcy court's order which authorized her to file a new adversary proceeding addressing the claims that were the subject of her previously dismissed adversary proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Mechem, No. 3:11-cv-00026-JPB; 3:11-ev-00025-JPB; 3:11-cv-00027-JPB; 3:02-bk-31227; 3:03-bk-00882, 2011 WL 3758693 (N.D.W.Va. Aug. 23, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.