Case Name: FIRST NATIONAL BANK IN DUNCAN v. WALLACE
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1940-11-19
Citations: 188 Okla. 183
Docket Number: No. 29388
Parties: FIRST NATIONAL BANK IN DUNCAN v. WALLACE.
Judges: BAYLESS, C. J., WELCH, V. C. J., and OSBORN, HURST, and NEFF, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 188
Pages: 183–183

Head Matter:
FIRST NATIONAL BANK IN DUNCAN v. WALLACE.
No. 29388.
Nov. 19, 1940.
107 P. 2d 536.
Everest & Halley and James C. Mc-Williams, all of Oklahoma City, and L. A. Winans, of Duncan, for plaintiff in error.
Smith & Siler and Harry Neuffer, all of Oklahoma City, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from an order of the district court entered on a garnishment proceeding. A motion to quash and dissolve the garnishment was filed, and thereupon, upon due consideration, an order was entered on February 24, 1939, dissolving said garnishment. The petition in error with case-made attached was filed August 8, 1939. A motion to dismiss has been filed for the reason that under section 555, O. S. 1931, 12 Okla. St. Ann. § 983, an order which dissolves a garnishment can only be reviewed where the appeal is taken within 30 days from the date of the order. The appeal must be dismissed under the rule announced in Security Bldg. & Loan Ass'n of Oklahoma City v. Ward, 174 Okla. 238, 50 P. 2d 651; Berry-Beall Dry Goods Co. v. Adams, 87 Okla. 291, 211 P. 79. These cases, after reiterating the rule announced above with regard to attachment, also hold that the same rule is applicable in an appeal from an order which discharges a garnishment.
Appeal dismissed.
BAYLESS, C. J., WELCH, V. C. J., and OSBORN, HURST, and NEFF, JJ., concur.