Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Herman C. NEWMAN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-03-12
Citations: 316 F. App'x 259
Docket Number: No. 08-7112
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Herman C. NEWMAN, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before MICHAEL, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 316
Pages: 259–260

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Herman C. NEWMAN, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 08-7112.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 20, 2009.
Decided: March 12, 2009.
Herman C. Newman, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Barrett Hudson, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MICHAEL, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Herman C. Newman appeals the district court's order granting his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006), and reducing his sentence to 150 months in prison. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Newman, No. 3:95-cr-00066-JPJ14 (W.D.Va. June 23, 2008); see United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247, 257 (4th Cir.2009) ("When a sentence is within the guidelines applicable at the time of the original sentencing, in an 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(3) resentencing hearing, a district judge is not authorized to reduce a defendant's sentence below the amended guideline range."). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.