Case Name: Walter L. MAAS and Mary A. Maas, Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1942-04-20
Citations: 127 F.2d 863
Docket Number: No. 10002
Parties: Walter L. MAAS and Mary A. Maas, Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
Judges: Before WILBUR, MATHEWS, and STEPHENS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 127
Pages: 863–863

Head Matter:
Walter L. MAAS and Mary A. Maas, Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
No. 10002.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
April 20, 1942.
Walter L. Maas, Jr., of Bakersfield, Cal., for petitioner.
Samuel P. Clark, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
Before WILBUR, MATHEWS, and STEPHENS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The matter of the default of petitioner in making deposit required by Rule 19 of the Rules of this Court, estimated expense of printing transcript of record herein, within the time as required by rule, coming on regularly for hearing, and it appearing from the files of this Court that no deposit has been made, that petitioner is in default, and has failed to respond to -the notice issued by the clerk of this Court that the matter would be presented to the Court on this date; it is ordered that the petition to review in this cause be dismissed for failure of petitioner to make printing deposit, that a judgment be filed and entered accordingly, and that the mandate of this Court in this cause issue as provided in rule.