Case Name: In the Matter of the Petition of the City of New York, Respondent, for a Writ of Certiorari against Abraham Deyo et al., as Members of and Constituting the Board of Assessors of the Town of Gardiner, Appellants; In the Matter of the Petition of the City of New York, Respondent, for a Writ of Certiorari against Charles H. Jansen et al., as Members of and Constituting the Board of Assessors of the Town of Shawangunk, Appellants
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1915-01-19
Citations: 213 N.Y. 706
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Petition of the City of New York, Respondent, for a Writ of Certiorari against Abraham Deyo et al., as Members of and Constituting the Board of Assessors of the Town of Gardiner, Appellants. In the Matter of the Petition of the City of New York, Respondent, for a Writ of Certiorari against Charles H. Jansen et al., as Members of and Constituting the Board of Assessors of the Town of Shawangunk, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 213
Pages: 706–706

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Petition of the City of New York, Respondent, for a Writ of Certiorari against Abraham Deyo et al., as Members of and Constituting the Board of Assessors of the Town of Gardiner, Appellants. In the Matter of the Petition of the City of New York, Respondent, for a Writ of Certiorari against Charles H. Jansen et al., as Members of and Constituting the Board of Assessors of the Town of Shawangunk, Appellants.
(Argued January 5, 1915,
decided January 19, 1915.)
Matter of City of New York v. Deyo, 158 App. Div. 319, affirmed.
People ex rel. City of New York v. Jansen, 158 App. Div. 909, affirmed.
Appeal in each of the above-entitled proceedings from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered May 6, 1913, which reversed an order of Special Term quashing a writ of certiorari to review an assessment'of real property of the petitioner for purposes of taxation.
Augustus H. Van Buren and Hector Sears for appellants.
Frank L. Polk, Corporation Counsel (William McM. Speer of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
Order in each case affirmed, with costs, on opinion of Lyon, J., below.
Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hiscock, Chase, Collin, Hogan, Miller and Cardozo, JJ.