Case Name: K.E.M., Petitioner v. P.C.S., Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2011-07-12
Citations: 611 Pa. 196
Docket Number: No. 393 MAL 2011
Parties: K.E.M., Petitioner v. P.C.S., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 611
Pages: 196–196

Head Matter:
23 A.3d 1050
K.E.M., Petitioner v. P.C.S., Respondent.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
July 12, 2011.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 12th day of July, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, are:
1. Whether the Superior Court of Pennsylvania erred by affirming the lower court finding that paternity by estoppel applies in the present case and precludes the petitioner/plaintif'f/mother from pursuing paternity or support against the respondent/putative father?
2. Whether the doctrine of paternity by estoppel, as applied in Pennsylvania, should be maintained, revised, or abrogated in its entirety?