Case Name: Raul Reza ARANDA, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-03-27
Citations: 272 F. App'x 569
Docket Number: No. 06-72363
Parties: Raul Reza ARANDA, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 272
Pages: 569–570

Head Matter:
Raul Reza ARANDA, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 06-72363.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 18, 2008.
Filed March 27, 2008.
Raul Reza Aranda, Oxnard, CA, pro se.
Stacy S. Paddack, Kurt B. Larson, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Offiee of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, District Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
Before: CANBY, T.G. NELSON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Raul Reza Aranda, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals decision affirming the immigration judge's denial of petitioner's application for cancellation of removal.
We lack jurisdiction to consider petitioner's challenge to the IJ's extreme hardship determination because it is a nonreviewable discretionary determination. See Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 890 (9th Cir.2003) (citing 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.