Case Name: Heath v. Shurling
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1922-12-12
Citations: 29 Ga. App. 258
Docket Number: 13669
Parties: Heath v. Shurling.
Judges: Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 29
Pages: 258–258

Head Matter:
13669.
Heath v. Shurling.
Decided December 12, 1922.
Complaint; from city court of Wrightsville— B. B. Blount, judge pro hac vice. April 8, 1922.
G. S. Glaxton, Adams & Gamp, for plaintiH in error.
B. L. Stephens, contra.

Opinion:
Luke, J.
In view of the counter-showing made to the motion for a continuance in this case, this court cannot say that there was an abuse of legal discretion in overruling such motion, it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.