Case Name: Alejandro MORALES, Petitioner-Appellant v. T. C. OUTLAW, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-07-29
Citations: 340 F. App'x 209
Docket Number: No. 08-40992
Parties: Alejandro MORALES, Petitioner-Appellant v. T. C. OUTLAW, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before GARZA, PRADO, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 340
Pages: 209–210

Head Matter:
Alejandro MORALES, Petitioner-Appellant v. T. C. OUTLAW, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 08-40992
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
July 29, 2009.
Alejandro Morales, Beaumont, TX, pro se.
Paul E. Ñaman, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Texas, Beaumont, TX, for Respondent-Appellee.
Before GARZA, PRADO, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Alejandro Morales, federal prisoner # 14368-179, appeals the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging a prison disciplinary proceeding in which the disciplinary hearing officer (DHO) determined that Morales had attempted a sexual assault of a prison counselor. Morales lost 54 days of good conduct time, in addition to other penalties. Morales contends that the evidence was insufficient to support the decision of the DHO.
Morales has not shown that the district court erred by determining that there was "some evidence" in the record to support the DHO's disciplinary decision where that decision was based on the counselor's written report stating that Morales blocked her exit from the office, exposed himself to her in a state of arousal, and refused her orders to leave the office. See Hudson v. Johnson, 242 F.3d 534, 536-37 (5th Cir.2001).
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.