Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shirley Marie CHAPMAN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-04-07
Citations: 320 F. App'x 184
Docket Number: No. 08-6912
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shirley Marie CHAPMAN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 320
Pages: 184–185

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shirley Marie CHAPMAN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-6912.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 23, 2009.
Decided: April 7, 2009.
Brian Joseph Kornbrath, Federal Public Defender, Clarksburg, West Virginia, Brian Christopher Crockett, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellant. Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Ap-pellee.
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Shirley Marie Chapman appeals the district court's order granting in part and denying in part her motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) and reducing her sentence to 57 months' imprisonment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court, United States v. Chapman, No. 3:06-cr-00007-JPB-1 (N.D.W.Va. May 28, 2008), and in our recent decision in United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir.2009). We also deny Chapman's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.