Case Name: QUINTANA v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1925-06-10
Citations: 273 S.W. 604
Docket Number: No. 9194
Parties: QUINTANA v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 273
Pages: 604–604

Head Matter:
QUINTANA v. STATE.
(No. 9194.)
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
June 10, 1925.)
Criminal law <©=>1144(14) — Requested special charge assumed properly refused, where record contains no- statement of facts.
A requested special charge must be assumed to have been properly refused, where record contains no statement of facts nor bill of exceptions.
Appeal from Criminal District Court, Cameron County; A. W. Cunningham, Judge.
Raldomero Quintana was convicted for felony theft, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
Aug. Celaya, of .Brownsville, for appellant.
Tom Garrard, State’s Atty., and Grover C. , Morris, Asst. State’s Atty., both of Austin,, for the State.

Opinion:
HAWKINS, J.
Conviction is for felony-theft ; ' punishment being two years in the penitentiary.
The record contains neither statement of' facts nor bills of exception. A special charge was requested and exception reserved to its refusal, but we have no way of appraising-the applicability of the special charge. In the absence of the facts, it must be assumed-that the court was correct in refusing the-charge.
The judgment in affirmed.