Case Name: Charles Dante PATTERSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Con MED; Warden of Baltimore County Department of Corrections, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-10-04
Citations: 669 F. App'x 142
Docket Number: No. 16-6663
Parties: Charles Dante PATTERSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Con MED; Warden of Baltimore County Department of Corrections, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 669
Pages: 142–142

Head Matter:
Charles Dante PATTERSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Con MED; Warden of Baltimore County Department of Corrections, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-6663
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: September 29, 2016
Decided: October 4, 2016
Charles Dante Patterson, Jr„ Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew Rigatuso, Eccleston & Wolf, PC, Hanover, Maryland; Jordan Vernon Watts, Jr., Baltimore County Office of Law, Towson, Maryland, for Appel-lees.
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Charles Dante Patterson, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Patterson's motion to appoint counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Patterson v. Con Med, No. 1:15-cv-03303-JFM, 2016 WL 1718226 (D. Md. Apr. 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED