Case Name: MICHAEL KINDER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1929-07-03
Citations: 7 N.J. Misc. 637
Docket Number: 
Parties: MICHAEL KINDER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 7
Pages: 637–637

Head Matter:
MICHAEL KINDER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Submitted January term, 1929
Decided July 3, 1929.
Before Justices Trenchard, Kalisch and Lloyd.
For the appellant, Ilobarb & Minará.
For the respondent, James P. Mylod.

Opinion:
Pee Curiam.
This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment for plaintiff on a second trial in the Essex Circuit Court. The grounds of appeal urged are that the trial judge should have controlled the case by nonsuit or direction of a verdict in favor of the defendant. The case was before the court on defendant's appeal from a previous trial, and was then reversed in an opinion which held that a nonsuit should have been granted. 103 N. J. L. 316.
The essential facts of the case as now presented do not vary materially from the facts as presented on the former trial.
For the reasons expressed in the opinion filed on the earlier review the present judgment is reversed.