Case Name: ASSOCIATION OF POINCIANA VILLAGES, INC., Petitioner, v. GURSKY RAGAN, P.A., etc., et al., Respondents.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2018-11-28
Citations: 261 So. 3d 669
Docket Number: No. 3D18-1267
Parties: ASSOCIATION OF POINCIANA VILLAGES, INC., Petitioner,
v.
GURSKY RAGAN, P.A., etc., et al., Respondents.
Judges: Before SALTER, EMAS and FERNANDEZ, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 261
Pages: 669–669

Head Matter:
ASSOCIATION OF POINCIANA VILLAGES, INC., Petitioner,
v.
GURSKY RAGAN, P.A., etc., et al., Respondents.
No. 3D18-1267
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Opinion filed November 28, 2018
Patsko Law Group, and Joseph T. Patsko (Tampa) and Michael J. Bayern (Tampa), for petitioner.
Kluger, Kaplan, Silverman, Katzen & Levine, P.L., and Abbey L. Kaplan and Josh M. Rubens, Miami, for respondents.
Before SALTER, EMAS and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Petition dismissed. See Reeves v. Fleetwood Homes of Fla., Inc., 889 So.2d 812, 822 (Fla. 2004) (holding that "to obtain a writ of certiorari, there must exist (1) a departure from the essential requirements of the law, (2) resulting in material injury for the remainder of the case (3) that cannot be corrected on postjudgment appeal") (quoting Bd. of Regents v. Snyder, 826 So.2d 382, 387 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) ). See also Williams v. Oken, 62 So.3d 1129, 1132 (Fla. 2011) (recognizing that "[t]he last two elements are jurisdictional and must be analyzed before the court may even consider the first element").