Case Name: Armand Schmoll, Inc., Respondent, v. Commonwealth & Dominion Line, Ltd., Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1932-06-02
Citations: 259 N.Y. 613
Docket Number: 
Parties: Armand Schmoll, Inc., Respondent, v. Commonwealth & Dominion Line, Ltd., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 259
Pages: 613–613

Head Matter:
Armand Schmoll, Inc., Respondent, v. Commonwealth & Dominion Line, Ltd., Appellant.
(Argued May 11, 1932;
decided June 2, 1932.)
L. deGrove Potter, John J. Heckman and Joseph W. Whelan for appellant.
Neil P. Cullom and James E. Freehill for respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed, with costs. Held, that while it was error to place the burden of proving seaworthiness upon the defendant, yet this ruling was harmless in view of all the evidence. No opinion.
Concur: Pound, Ch. J., Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O'Brien, Hubbs and Crouch, JJ.