Case Name: UNITED STATES v. MURRAY
Court: United States Circuit Court for the District of Ohio
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1851-04
Citations: 27 F. Cas. 38
Docket Number: 
Parties: UNITED STATES v. MURRAY.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Cases
Volume: 27
Pages: 38–38

Head Matter:
Case No. 15,843.
UNITED STATES v. MURRAY.
[5 McLean, 207.]
Circuit Court, D. Ohio.
April Term, 1851.
Public Lands — Cutting Timber— Reparation.
1. Where full reparation was made for a trespass on the public lands, by purchasing the land in part, and by paying the purchaser of the other part, for the trees cut on it, a nominal fine only was imposed.
2. The trespasser seemed to have no intention of defrauding the public.
[This was an indictment against Jacob Murray.]
The United States District Attorney, for the United States.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT.
This is an indictment for cutting oak and other timber on the land of the United States. The defendant confessed that he was in the employment of an individual, and cut, say, two thousand trees for ties for railroad. That the man who employed him intended to enter the land, and did enter two quarters of it, but the other quarter was entered by another individual. That he paid the individual who entered the quarter section for the trees cut on it. And the other entry covered the land on which the other trespass was committed. The trespass was not an aggravated one, and, in fact, did injury to no one, that was not satisfactorily settled. The land was sold at the price fixed by law, hav--ing been previously offered, but not sold at public sale. Upon the whole, the court will impose a nominal fine, as there was no intention, it would seem, to defraud the public. The defendant. was fined five dollars and costs.