Case Name: Timothy CLAY, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2015-05-19
Citations: 461 S.W.3d 453
Docket Number: WD 77426
Parties: Timothy CLAY, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Division One: James Edward Welsh, P.J., Thomas H. Newton, and Karen King Mitchell, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 461
Pages: 453–453

Head Matter:
Timothy CLAY, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
WD 77426
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
ORDER FILED: May 19, 2015
Mark Grothoff, Columbia, MO Counsel for Appellant.
Richard Starnes, Jefferson City, MO Counsel for Respondent.
Before Division One: James Edward Welsh, P.J., Thomas H. Newton, and Karen King Mitchell, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
Per Curiam:
Mr. Timothy Clay, Jr., appeals the denial of a 29.15 post-conviction relief motion. He claims trial counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate and call the codefen-dant to corroborate a self-defense theory. He also claims appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to file surveillance video exhibits to support the insufficiency of evidence argument. We affirm.
For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).