Case Name: The State of Missouri, at the Information of J. Patrick Wheeler, Prosecuting Attorney of Lewis County, Missouri, at the Relation of John Berhorst, Frank H. Gaus, Homer E. Gaus, Asberry Boyer, George Ellison, Roy O. Crist, Charles Shumate, John Hate, W. J. Stephens, W. B. Powell, J. C. Wiseman, Ray Bowman, W. A. Nofsinger, Herbert Barr, A. C. Eisenberg, Noah Stahl, Sumner Henry, George Widdows, George Richter and J. O. Reid, Appellants, v. Reorganized School District R-VI in Lewis County, Missouri, Robert S. Maiers, Thomas Brown, James Nunn, Roy McDowell, W. L. Breuer, and Theodore Sturhan, Board of Education of Reorganized School District R-VI in Lewis County, Missouri, Kenneth S. Plant, Collector of Lewis County, Missouri, and Bleigh Construction Company, a Missouri Corporation, Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Missouri
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1955-11-14
Citations: 365 Mo. 545
Docket Number: No. 44689
Parties: The State of Missouri, at the Information of J. Patrick Wheeler, Prosecuting Attorney of Lewis County, Missouri, at the Relation of John Berhorst, Frank H. Gaus, Homer E. Gaus, Asberry Boyer, George Ellison, Roy O. Crist, Charles Shumate, John Hate, W. J. Stephens, W. B. Powell, J. C. Wiseman, Ray Bowman, W. A. Nofsinger, Herbert Barr, A. C. Eisenberg, Noah Stahl, Sumner Henry, George Widdows, George Richter and J. O. Reid, Appellants, v. Reorganized School District R-VI in Lewis County, Missouri, Robert S. Maiers, Thomas Brown, James Nunn, Roy McDowell, W. L. Breuer, and Theodore Sturhan, Board of Education of Reorganized School District R-VI in Lewis County, Missouri, Kenneth S. Plant, Collector of Lewis County, Missouri, and Bleigh Construction Company, a Missouri Corporation, Respondents,
Judges: Leedy, G. J.,, Hollingsworth and Hycle, LJconcur; Eager, J., dissents in separatp, opinion; Westimes, J., and Bua-rh, Special Judge, dissent, and concur in separate dissenting opinion of Eager, J.
Reporter: Missouri Reports
Volume: 365
Pages: 545–552

Head Matter:
The State of Missouri, at the Information of J. Patrick Wheeler, Prosecuting Attorney of Lewis County, Missouri, at the Relation of John Berhorst, Frank H. Gaus, Homer E. Gaus, Asberry Boyer, George Ellison, Roy O. Crist, Charles Shumate, John Hate, W. J. Stephens, W. B. Powell, J. C. Wiseman, Ray Bowman, W. A. Nofsinger, Herbert Barr, A. C. Eisenberg, Noah Stahl, Sumner Henry, George Widdows, George Richter and J. O. Reid, Appellants, v. Reorganized School District R-VI in Lewis County, Missouri, Robert S. Maiers, Thomas Brown, James Nunn, Roy McDowell, W. L. Breuer, and Theodore Sturhan, Board of Education of Reorganized School District R-VI in Lewis County, Missouri, Kenneth S. Plant, Collector of Lewis County, Missouri, and Bleigh Construction Company, a Missouri Corporation, Respondents,
No. 44689
284 S.W. (2d) 535.
Court en Banc,
November 14, 1955.
Rehearing Denied, December 12, 1955.
J. Andy Zenge, Jr., J. Patrick Wheeler and BendJen <& Bendlen for appellants. ' ■■
Boyle G. Clark and Raymond G. Lewis, Jr., for respondents; Clark & Becker of counsel.

Opinion:
STORCKMAN, J.-
[536] This is an action seeking to declare a school tax levy void and to enjoin its collection. Defendants' motions to dismiss plaintiffs ' petition were sustained and plaintiffs have appealed. This case was consolidated for argument on appeal with the case of Alfred Rathjen, et al., v. Reorganized School District R-II et al., No. 44,787, 365 Mo. 518, 284 S.W. 2d 516.
The relators are residents and taxpayers of the defendant school district. Their petition alleges that at the annual school election held on April 6, 1954, a proposition was submitted to authorize the levy of a tax rate of one dollar on the hundred dollars assessed valuation for the construction of new and additional classrooms in the school district; that more than a majority but less than two-thirds of the ballots and votes cast were in favor of levying the tax proposed; that "under the provisions of Article X, Section 11, of the Constitution of Missouri, 1945, as amended and the provisions of the Revised Statutes of Missouri, applicable thereto, the levy of One Dollar ($1.00) on the One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) valuation for building purposes could not be made by the defendant school district and board of education unless and until such levy had been voted by two thirds (2/3rds) majority of the qualified resident, taxpaying voters in said school district voting in said election"; that defendant members of the Board of Education declared and certified that proposed tax rate was approved and adopted and that said tax rate has been extended and would be collected and disbursed for the construction of new and additional classrooms unless it be declared void and its collection, be enjoined. . . .
.Defendants' motions to dismiss alleging that-the petition failed .to state a claim upon which relief could be granted were sustained, .and after an unavailing motion to set aside the court's order of dismissal this appeal was taken. ,
The legal question involved is the same as presented in the case of Alfred Rathjen, et al., v. Reorganized School District R-II of Shelby County, Missouri, et al., No. 44,787, 365 Mo. 518, 284 S. W. 2d 51.6, ajid. for -the reasons given in the opinion this day filed in that ease the judgment herein should be affirmed and it is so - ordered.
Leedy, G. J.,, Hollingsworth and Hycle, LJconcur; Eager, J., dissents in separatp, opinion; Westimes, J., and Bua-rh, Special Judge, dissent, and concur in separate dissenting opinion of Eager, J.