Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marcelle WHITFIELD, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-02-24
Citations: 556 F. App'x 843
Docket Number: No. 13-13371
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marcelle WHITFIELD, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 556
Pages: 843–843

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marcelle WHITFIELD, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-13371
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Feb. 24, 2014.
Susan Hollis Rothstein-Youakim, Arthur Lee Bentley, III, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, Shawn P. Napier, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Orlando, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marcelle Whitfield, Butner, NC, pro se.
Rosemary Cakmis, Maria Guzman, Donna Lee Elm, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Orlando, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Rosemary Cakmis, counsel for Marcelle Whitfield in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Whitfield's convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.