Case Name: Maurice GLETZER, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Amos HARRIS and Brady Capital, Inc., Defendants/Appellants
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-01-31
Citations: 357 S.W.3d 609
Docket Number: No. ED 95304
Parties: Maurice GLETZER, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Amos HARRIS and Brady Capital, Inc., Defendants/Appellants.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 357
Pages: 609–610

Head Matter:
Maurice GLETZER, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Amos HARRIS and Brady Capital, Inc., Defendants/Appellants.
No. ED 95304.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Jan. 31, 2012.
Joshua M. Schindler, H. Anthony Relys, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant, Amos Harris.
Brian L. Harvell, Justin M. Weinrich, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant, Brady Capital.
Daniel S. Peters, John G. Beseau, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellants Amos Brady Harris ("Harris") and real estate development company Brady Capital, Inc. ("Brady Capital") ap peal from the circuit court's judgment granting a creditor's bill in favor of Plaintiff Maurice Gletzer ("Gletzer") on his petition to satisfy a judgment against Harris from 1991. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).