Case Name: SARAH BURNS AND HUSBAND, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR, v. RICHARD ECKERT, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1907-02-02
Citations: 74 N.J.L. 685
Docket Number: 
Parties: SARAH BURNS AND HUSBAND, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR, v. RICHARD ECKERT, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 74
Pages: 685–686

Head Matter:
SARAH BURNS AND HUSBAND, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR, v. RICHARD ECKERT, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Argued December 3, 1906 —
Decided February 2, 1907.
On error to the Supreme Court. ■
Por the plaintiff in error, Thomas F. Noonan.
Por the defendants in error, Howard R. Cruse.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment in this cause is affirmed, for the reason given in the per curiam opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Ti-ie Chancellor, Garrison, Hendrickson, Swayze, Reed, Trenchard, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill, J.J. 12.
For reversal — Hone.