Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Charles Harris, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2003-11-03
Citations: 1 A.D.2d 378
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles Harris, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 1
Pages: 378–378

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles Harris, Appellant.
[766 NYS2d 868]

Opinion:
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Roman, J.), rendered June 7, 2001, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. There were two eyewitnesses to, and a videotape of, the robbery committed by the defendant at gunpoint with the aid of two accomplices, one of whom was" also armed with a gun (see Penal Law § 160.10, 160.15). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]; People v Sanders, 122 AD2d 86 [1986]). Krausman, J.E, McGinity, Cozier and Rivera, JJ., concur.