Case Name: HUGO KLOTZ, PLAINTIFF, v. MICHAEL MANGO, DEFENDANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1928-03-29
Citations: 6 N.J. Misc. 373
Docket Number: 
Parties: HUGO KLOTZ, PLAINTIFF, v. MICHAEL MANGO, DEFENDANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 6
Pages: 373–373

Head Matter:
HUGO KLOTZ, PLAINTIFF, v. MICHAEL MANGO, DEFENDANT.
Submitted October term, 1927
Decided March 29, 1928.
Before Gummere, Chief Justice, and Justices Black and Lloyd.
For the rule, William Newcorn.
Contra, Winfield S. Angleman.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This is plaintiffs rule for new trial, a verdict having been rendered in his favor for one dollar. The action was to recover for injuries to plaintiffs truck, growing out of a collision between the trucks of the plaintiff and the defendant.
The damage to the plaintiff's truck was substantial and the jury's finding is without rational explanation.
The rule for new trial is made absolute.