Case Name: In re: Guetatchew FIKROU, Debtor; Guetatchew Fikrou, Appellant, v. First Nationwide Mortgage Corporation; et al., Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-04-15
Citations: 32 F. App'x 495
Docket Number: No. 01-15162, NC-00-1108-RYGR, NC-00-1113-RY GR; BAP Nos. NC-00-1108-RyGR NC-00-1113-RyGR
Parties: In re: Guetatchew FIKROU, Debtor. Guetatchew Fikrou, Appellant, v. First Nationwide Mortgage Corporation; et al., Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 32
Pages: 495–496

Head Matter:
In re: Guetatchew FIKROU, Debtor. Guetatchew Fikrou, Appellant, v. First Nationwide Mortgage Corporation; et al., Appellees.
No. 01-15162, NC-00-1108-RYGR, NC-00-1113-RY GR.
BAP Nos. NC-00-1108-RyGR NC-00-1113-RyGR.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 8, 2002 .
Decided April 15, 2002.
Before BROWNING, KLEINFELD, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, appellant’s request for oral argument is denied.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Guetatchew Fikrou appeals pro se the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's ("BAP") af firmance of the bankruptcy court's judgment dismissing Fikrou's adversary action, which challenged defendants' transfer of property. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We independently review the BAP decision. See United States v. Battley (In re Kimura), 969 F.2d 806, 810 (9th Cir.1992). We review for clear error the bankruptcy court's findings of fact, and we review de novo its conclusions of law. See id. We affirm for the reasons stated in the BAP's memorandum disposition filed December 28, 2000.
Fikrou's remaining contentions are without merit.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publi cation and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.