Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Donald Wayne FOGLE, Appellant; Donald Wayne FOGLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1996-08-13
Citations: 926 S.W.2d 723
Docket Number: No. 67177
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Donald Wayne FOGLE, Appellant. Donald Wayne FOGLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 926
Pages: 723–723

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Donald Wayne FOGLE, Appellant. Donald Wayne FOGLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 67177.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Aug. 13, 1996.
Emmett D. Queener, Ellen H. Flottman, Public Defenders, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Becky Owenson Kilpatrick, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Donald W. Fogle ("defendant"), appeals the judgment of conviction of the Circuit Court of Marion County entered after a jury convicted defendant of rape, RSMo § 566.030 (RSMo Cum.Supp.1991). Defendant also appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find no error of law was committed by the trial court. We further find the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. As no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion, we affirm the judgments of the trial and motion courts pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b). A memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision is provided solely for the parties involved.