Case Name: Marie T. Hauser, Resp't, v. The Metropolitan Elevated R. Co. et al., App'lts; John Becker, Resp't, v. The Metropolitan Elevated R. Co. et al, App'lts; Charles F. Hchus, Resp't. v. The Metropolitan Elevated R. Co. et al., App'lts
Court: New York Superior Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1891-05-04
Citations: 38 N.Y. St. Rep. 531
Docket Number: 
Parties: Marie T. Hauser, Resp’t, v. The Metropolitan Elevated R. Co. et al., App’lts. John Becker, Resp’t, v. The Metropolitan Elevated R. Co. et al, App’lts. Charles F. Hchus, Resp’t. v. The Metropolitan Elevated R. Co. et al., App’lts.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 38
Pages: 531–531

Head Matter:
Marie T. Hauser, Resp’t, v. The Metropolitan Elevated R. Co. et al., App’lts. John Becker, Resp’t, v. The Metropolitan Elevated R. Co. et al, App’lts. Charles F. Hchus, Resp’t. v. The Metropolitan Elevated R. Co. et al., App’lts.
(New York Superior Court, General Term,
Filed May 4, 1891.)
Appeals by defendants from judgments.
Julien T. Davies and I. C. Thomson, for app’lts; Charles Gibson Bennett, for resp’ts.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgments in these cases are severally affirmed, with costs.
Sedgwick, Oh. J., and McAdam, J., concur.