Case Name: Warren CHASE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WARDEN, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-03-09
Citations: 315 F. App'x 455
Docket Number: No. 08-8022
Parties: Warren CHASE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WARDEN, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 315
Pages: 455–455

Head Matter:
Warren CHASE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WARDEN, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 08-8022.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 25, 2009.
Decided: March 9, 2009.
Warren Chase, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Warren Chase, a Maryland inmate, appeals a district court order dismissing without prejudice his "emergency" pleading for failing to provide a more detailed supplement. We have reviewed the record and the district court order and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See Chase v. Warden, No. 1:08-cv-01702-CCB (D.Md. July 29, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.