Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julian Grant CHILDS, a/k/a Poncho, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-02-25
Citations: 367 F. App'x 411
Docket Number: No. 09-7873
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Julian Grant CHILDS, a/k/a Poncho, Defendant— Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 367
Pages: 411–411

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Julian Grant CHILDS, a/k/a Poncho, Defendant— Appellant.
No. 09-7873.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 18, 2010.
Decided: Feb. 25, 2010.
Julian Grant Childs, Appellant Pro Se. Gurney Wingate Grant, II, Assistant United Statés Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, ' for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Julian Grant Childs appeals the district court's order denying his pro se motion to compel the Government to file a motion for sentence reduction pursuant to Fed. R.Crim.P. 35(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. See United States v. Childs, No. 3:05-cr-00249-RLW-1 (E.D.Va. Sept. 8, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.