Case Name: Richard Lee COLONEL, Appellant, v. MELROSE AREA PROPERTY OWNERS, etc., et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2006-05-05
Citations: 930 So. 2d 755
Docket Number: Nos. 5D04-3781, 5D05-1825
Parties: Richard Lee COLONEL, Appellant, v. MELROSE AREA PROPERTY OWNERS, etc., et al., Appellees.
Judges: SHARP, W., TORPY and LAWSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 930
Pages: 755–756

Head Matter:
Richard Lee COLONEL, Appellant, v. MELROSE AREA PROPERTY OWNERS, etc., et al., Appellees.
Nos. 5D04-3781, 5D05-1825.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
May 5, 2006.
Rehearing Denied June 8, 2006.
Richard Lee Colonel, Hawthorne, in proper person.
Lawrence J. Marraffino, Gainesville, and C. Wesley G. Currier, St. Simons Island, GA, for Appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Sua sponte, we consolidate these two appeals, which emanate from the same lower court proceeding. We affirm the lower court's orders in all respects except that portion of the order dated June 2, 2005, awarding attorney's fees to Appel-lees, Carl and Julie Schlick. Because the attorney's fee award was based on a joint proposal for settlement that did not state the amount attributable to each offering party, the proposal was defective and the fee award erroneous. Lamb v. Matetzschk, 906 So.2d 1037, 1042 (Fla.2005); D.A.B. Constructors, Inc. v. Oliver, 914 So.2d 462 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART.
SHARP, W., TORPY and LAWSON, JJ., concur.