Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Rafael Martinez, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2004-03-23
Citations: 5 A.D.3d 278
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rafael Martinez, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 5
Pages: 278–278

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rafael Martinez, Appellant.
[774 NYS2d 680]

Opinion:
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Felice Shea, J.), rendered July 2, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third and fourth degrees, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 71/2 to 15 years, unanimously affirmed.
The challenged portions of the People's summation generally constituted fair comment on the evidence, and reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom, in response to defense arguments, and the summation did not deprive defendant of a fair trial (see People v Overlee, 236 AD2d 133 [1997], lv denied 91 NY2d 976 [1998]; People v D'Alessandro, 184 AD2d 114, 118-119 [1992], lv denied 81 NY2d 884 [1993]). The People were entitled to comment on the credibility of defendant's testimony and on the lack of evidentiary support for his claims. To the extent that the summation contained any improprieties, the court's curative actions, along with its final jury instructions, prevented any prejudice. The court clearly instructed the jury that the burden of proof remained on the People and did not shift to defendant. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Ellerin and Gonzalez, JJ.