Case Name: Cheryl B. CARTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. McCREARY MODERN, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-03-07
Citations: 468 F. App'x 219
Docket Number: No. 11-1901
Parties: Cheryl B. CARTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. McCREARY MODERN, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before GREGORY, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 468
Pages: 219–220

Head Matter:
Cheryl B. CARTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. McCREARY MODERN, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 11-1901.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 28, 2012.
Decided: March 7, 2012.
Jenny L. Sharpe, Law Office of Jenny L. Sharpe, Charlotte, North Carolina; Tamara W. Brooks, Brooks Law Office, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Stephen M. Thomas, Michael P. Thomas, Susan W. Matthews, Patrick, Harper & Dixon, L.L.P., Hickory, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before GREGORY, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Cheryl B. Carter appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of McCreary Modern, Inc., in her action in which she alleged that McCreary regarded her as disabled and employed improper qualifications stan dards in denying her employment. We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs filed by the parties and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Carter v. McCreary Modern, Inc., No. 5:10-cv-00014-RLV-DSC, 2011 WL 3444090 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 8, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.