Case Name: Gregory Szurnicki et al., Appellants, v. Carol Janisch et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1994-03-11
Citations: 202 A.D.2d 1071
Docket Number: 
Parties: Gregory Szurnicki et al., Appellants, v Carol Janisch et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 202
Pages: 1071–1072

Head Matter:
Gregory Szurnicki et al., Appellants, v Carol Janisch et al., Respondents.
[612 NYS2d 983]

Opinion:
—Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court (Oshrin, J.). We add only that petitioners' argument concerning the failure of respondent Kings Park Board of Education to comply with its own policy regarding notice was not raised at Supreme Court and is, therefore, not addressed on this appeal (see, Collucci v Collucci, 58 NY2d 834, 836-837). We further conclude that this proceeding is not barred by laches (see, Schreier v Cummings, 250 App Div 808). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Suffolk County, Oshrin, J. — Article 78.) Present — Green, J. P., Balio, Fallon, Doerr and JJ. Boehm,