Case Name: CAIN et v. MATTHEWS SELECTED DAIRIES CO.
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1927-07-18
Citations: 6 Ohio Law Abs. 8
Docket Number: No. 3066
Parties: CAIN et v. MATTHEWS SELECTED DAIRIES CO.
Judges: (Cushing, J., concurs.)
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 6
Pages: 8–8

Head Matter:
CAIN et v. MATTHEWS SELECTED DAIRIES CO.
Ohio Appeals, 1st Dist., Hamilton Co.
No. 3066.
Decided July 18, 1927.
Bettinger, Schmidt & Kreis, Cincinnati, for Cain.
John C. Hermann, Cincinnati, for Matthews Selected Dairies Co.

Opinion:
OPINION OF COURT.
The following is taken, verbatim, from the opinion.
HAMILTON, PJ.
We are of the opinion that the case comes within the luling in the case of Stoohfang v. Cincinnati Aluminum Castings Co., 13 Oh. Ap. 334 and cases therein cited. This decision was in line with the case of Bliss v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co., 167 Fed. Rep. 342. On authority of these cases, the motion to dismiss the appeal will be overruled.,
(Cushing, J., concurs.)