Case Name: NYCTL 1997-1 Trust et al., Respondents, v. Oneg Shabbos, Inc., et al., Defendants, and Square Funding Corp., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2004-03-15
Citations: 5 A.D.3d 568
Docket Number: 
Parties: NYCTL 1997-1 Trust et al., Respondents, v Oneg Shabbos, Inc., et al., Defendants, and Square Funding Corp., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 5
Pages: 568–568

Head Matter:
NYCTL 1997-1 Trust et al., Respondents, v Oneg Shabbos, Inc., et al., Defendants, and Square Funding Corp., Appellant.
[772 NYS2d 848]

Opinion:
In an action to foreclose tax liens, the defendant Square Funding Corp. appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated March 11, 2003, which denied its motion to cancel the notice of pendency filed in the action on the ground that a prior notice of pendency filed in the action had lapsed.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Administrative Code of City of NY § 11-335 provides that actions to foreclose tax liens shall be governed by the "rules of practice applicable to actions to foreclose mortgages on real property." A new notice of pendency may be filed in a mortgage foreclosure action despite the cancellation of a previous notice of pendency (see Horowitz v Griggs, 2 AD3d 404 [2003]; Campbell v Smith, 309 AD2d 581 [2003]; Slutsky v Blooming Grove Inn, 147 AD2d 208 [1989]). Smith, J.P., Goldstein, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.