Case Name: Kahleem BROOKINS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-10-05
Citations: 3 S.W.3d 890
Docket Number: No. ED 75270
Parties: Kahleem BROOKINS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., and ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 3
Pages: 890–891

Head Matter:
Kahleem BROOKINS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 75270.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Oct. 5, 1999.
Douglas R. Hoff, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Daniel W. Follet, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., and ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Kahleem Brookins appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court's judgment is based on findings of fact and conclusions of law that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a memorandum of law, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).