Case Name: DOUGLAS L. HADSELL, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1997-07-23
Citations: 149 Or. App. 400
Docket Number: CA A86175
Parties: DOUGLAS L. HADSELL, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.
Judges: Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Armstrong, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 149
Pages: 400–401

Head Matter:
Submitted on record and briefs June 27,
rules held valid July 23,1997
DOUGLAS L. HADSELL, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.
(CA A86175)
942 P2d 905
Douglas L. Hadsell filed the brief pro se.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Christine Chute, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Armstrong, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Pursuant to ORS 183.400(1), petitioner challenges the validity of the Department of Corrections rules, OAR 291, division 104, as inconsistent with ORS 138.135(1). Petitioner's arguments do not provide a basis for invalidating the rules. For that reason, we hold them valid in this case.
Rules held valid.