Case Name: Paleno ESTRADA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1997-02-21
Citations: 689 So. 2d 372
Docket Number: No. 95-02660
Parties: Paleno ESTRADA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and LAZZARA and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 689
Pages: 372–372

Head Matter:
Paleno ESTRADA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 95-02660.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Feb. 21, 1997.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Brad Permar, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robert J. Krauss, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The defendant, Paleno Estrada, challenges his judgment and sentence for aggravated battery. After a review of the record in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we affirm the defendant's conviction. We strike, however, that portion of probation condition 9 requiring Mr. Estrada to pay for random drug and alcohol testing because it is a special condition that was not orally announced at sentencing. Luby v. State, 648 So.2d 308 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). We affirm the sentence in all other respects.
CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and LAZZARA and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.