Case Name: The State, ex rel. Rhodes, Appellant, v. Van Brocklin, Appellee
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1988-05-11
Citations: 36 Ohio St. 3d 236
Docket Number: No. 88-17
Parties: The State, ex rel. Rhodes, Appellant, v. Van Brocklin, Appellee.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 36
Pages: 236–236

Head Matter:
The State, ex rel. Rhodes, Appellant, v. Van Brocklin, Appellee.
[Cite as State, ex rel. Rhodes, v. Van Brocklin (1988), 36 Ohio St. 3d 236.]
(No. 88-17
Decided May 11, 1988.)
Vincent C. Rhodes, pro se.
Gary L. Van Brocklin, prosecuting attorney, and Mary Jane Stephens, for appellee.

Opinion:
On the basis that appellant has an adequate remedy at law, the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the complaint in mandamus (case No. 87 CA 176) is affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.