Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alejandro SANCHEZ-CEBALLOS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-06-04
Citations: 36 F. App'x 312
Docket Number: No. 01-10522; D.C. No. CR-00-01412-JMR-01
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alejandro SANCHEZ-CEBALLOS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 36
Pages: 312–313

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alejandro SANCHEZ-CEBALLOS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 01-10522.
D.C. No. CR-00-01412-JMR-01.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 8, 2002.
Decided June 4, 2002.
Before BROWNING, KLEINFELD, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Alejandro Sanchez-Ceballos appeals his 108-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to possession with intent to distribute, conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute, importation, and conspiracy to import cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A)(ii), 846, 952(a), 960(a)(1), 960(b)(1)(B)(ii), and 968. We lack jurisdiction and dismiss.
Sanchez-Cerballos contends the district court improperly denied his request for a downward departure based on aberrant behavior. We lack jurisdiction to review the district court's discretionary decision not to grant a downward departure. See United States v. Rivera-Sanchez, 222 F.3d 1057, 1064 (9th Cir.2000).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
. At sentencing, the district court judge stated, "[i]n considering the discretion that is vested in me, I find there is no grounds for departure in connection with your case."