Case Name: Eddie Lee WORSLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Beverly PERDUE, Governor, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-01-03
Citations: 406 F. App'x 752
Docket Number: No. 10-1848
Parties: Eddie Lee WORSLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Beverly PERDUE, Governor, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before ÑIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 406
Pages: 752–753

Head Matter:
Eddie Lee WORSLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Beverly PERDUE, Governor, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 10-1848.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 21, 2010.
Decided: Jan. 3, 2011.
Eddie Lee Worsley, Appellant Pro Se.
Before ÑIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Eddie Lee Worsley appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Worsley's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, Worsley has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade quately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.