Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gregory Vonzell COMER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-03-07
Citations: 30 F. App'x 215
Docket Number: No. 01-8081
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gregory Vonzell COMER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINS, DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 30
Pages: 215–216

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gregory Vonzell COMER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 01-8081.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 21, 2002.
Decided March 7, 2002.
Gregory Vonzell Comer, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Blue Boggs, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINS, DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Gregory Vonzell Comer appeals from the district court's order denying his mo tion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)(2) (West 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Comer, No. CR-95-69 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 21, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.