Case Name: Lydia A. CHARLES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Patrick R. DONAHOE, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-03-19
Citations: 597 F. App'x 205
Docket Number: No. 14-2171
Parties: Lydia A. CHARLES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Patrick R. DONAHOE, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 597
Pages: 205–205

Head Matter:
Lydia A. CHARLES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Patrick R. DONAHOE, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 14-2171.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 17, 2015.
Decided: March 19, 2015.
Lydia A. Charles, Appellant Pro Se. Gill Paul Beck, Sr., Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Lydia A. Charles appeals the district court's order denying relief on her complaint alleging that the United States Postal Service discriminated and retaliated against her in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Charles leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Charles v. Donahoe, No. 3:12-cv-00402-RJC-DSC, 2014 WL 4829034 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 29, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.