Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lacarlos Demond CURETON, a/k/a Loco, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-01-26
Citations: 408 F. App'x 708
Docket Number: No. 10-7224
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lacarlos Demond CURETON, a/k/a Loco, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 408
Pages: 708–709

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lacarlos Demond CURETON, a/k/a Loco, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-7224.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 18, 2011.
Decided: Jan. 26, 2011.
Lacarlos Demond Cureton, Appellant Pro Se. Jimmie Ewing, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Lacarlos Demond Cureton appeals the district court's order denying his motion to compel the Government to file a Fed. R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Cureton, No. 0:02-cr-01173-JFA-7 (D.S.C. Aug. 25, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.