Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jennifer Michelle MOHR, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-08-20
Citations: 44 F. App'x 751
Docket Number: No. 00-50509; D.C. No. CR-99-03634-IEG
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jennifer Michelle MOHR, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 44
Pages: 751–752

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jennifer Michelle MOHR, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 00-50509.
D.C. No. CR-99-03634-IEG.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submission Deferred May 8, 2001.
Submitted and Decided Aug. 20, 2002.
Before D.W. NELSON, FERNANDEZ and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2)

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
The decision below is AFFIRMED. See United States v. Mendoza-Paz, 286 F.3d 1104, 1109-10 (9th Cir.2002) (holding that 21 U.S.C. § 960 is constitutional on its face); United States v. Carranza, 289 F.3d 634, 644 (9th Cir.2002) ("The base offense level for guideline sentencing may be determined by the volume of the drug actually imported, whether or not the defendant knows either the volume or the nature of the substance — if he knows only that he is importing a controlled substance.").
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.