Case Name: SAM'S EAST, INC., Plaintiff v. REGINALD S. HINTON, Secretary of Revenue of the State of North Carolina, Defendant
Court: North Carolina Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 2009-05-19
Citations: 197 N.C. App. 229
Docket Number: No. COA08-453
Parties: SAM’S EAST, INC., Plaintiff v. REGINALD S. HINTON, Secretary of Revenue of the State of North Carolina, Defendant
Judges: Judges STEELMAN and JACKSON concur.
Reporter: North Carolina Court of Appeals Reports
Volume: 197
Pages: 229–230

Head Matter:
SAM’S EAST, INC., Plaintiff v. REGINALD S. HINTON, Secretary of Revenue of the State of North Carolina, Defendant
No. COA08-453
(Filed 19 May 2009)
Taxation— assessment of additional taxes and interest— penalties
For the reasons stated in Wal-Mart Stores E., Inc. v. Hinton, No. COA08-450, which is filed simultaneously with this opinion, judgment is affirmed with respect to the assessment of additional taxes, interest, and penalties.
Appeal by plaintiff Sam’s East, Inc. from order entered 4 January 2008 by Judge Clarence E. Horton, Jr. in Wake County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 22 October 2008.
Alston & Bird, LLP, by Jasper L. Cummings, Jr. for plaintiff-appellant.
Attorney General Roy A. Cooper, III, by Special Deputy Attorney General Kay Linn Miller Hobart, for defendant-appellee.
Wilson & Coffey, LLP by G. Gray Wilson and Stuart H. Russell for amicus curiae.

Opinion:
STROUD, Judge.
Plaintiff Sam's East, Inc. appeals from an order entered 4 January 2008 granting summary judgment in favor of defendant. This case was consolidated with Wal-Mart Stores East, Inc. v. Hinton, No. COA08-450 (Wake County 06-CVS-3928) for the purpose of entry of summary judgment because as the trial court stated in the summary judgment order, "with the exception of the amounts assessed . . . the same facts and reasoning apply" to both cases. Neither party disputes this statement and we found nothing in the record indicating otherwise. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in Wal-Mart Stores East, Inc. v. Hinton, No. COA08-450, which is to be filed simultaneously with this opinion, judgment is affirmed with respect to the assessment of additional taxes and interest thereon. Furthermore, judgment as to the penalties assessed is also affirmed.
Affirmed.
Judges STEELMAN and JACKSON concur.