Case Name: Huey P. WALTERS, Petitioner-Appellant v. Rick THALER, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-03-15
Citations: 370 F. App'x 490
Docket Number: No. 08-20599
Parties: Huey P. WALTERS, Petitioner-Appellant v. Rick THALER, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 370
Pages: 490–490

Head Matter:
Huey P. WALTERS, Petitioner-Appellant v. Rick THALER, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 08-20599
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 15, 2010.
Huey P. Walters, Huntsville, TX, pro se.
Jessica Michelle Hartsell, Office of the Attorney General, Postconviction Litigation Div., Austin, TX, for Respondent-Ap-pellee.
Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Huey Walters, Texas prisoner # 501052, was convicted in 1987 of aggravated sexual assault and was sentenced to 60 years in prison. Walters appeals the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition, arguing that prison officials (1) had failed to award all of the good-time credits to which he was entitled upon his completion of an education program in December 2003 and (2) had failed to backdate the award of those credits to his sentence-begin date, in violation of the Fifth Amendment's Due Process and Ex Post Facto Clauses and of the Fourteenth Amendment. We granted a certifícate of appealability on the first issue only. Walters v. Quarterman, No. 08-20599 (5th Cir. June 17, 2009) (unpublished).
During the pendency of this appeal, Walters was released from prison to mandatory supervision. As a result, Walters's appeal has been rendered moot. See Spencer v. Kenwa, 523 U.S. 1, 7, 118 S.Ct. 978, 140 L.Ed.2d 43 (1998); Bailey v. Southerland, 821 F.2d 277, 278-79 (5th Cir.1987). Accordingly, the APPEAL is DISMISSED as MOOT. Walters's motion to expedite the appeal is DENIED.
Pursuant to 5th Cut. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cut. R. 47.5.4.