Case Name: Jose Leon GUERRA; Maria Del Soccorro Guerra, Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-11-14
Citations: 206 F. App'x 703
Docket Number: No. 04-70823
Parties: Jose Leon GUERRA; Maria Del Soccorro Guerra, Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: LEAVY, GOULD, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 206
Pages: 703–704

Head Matter:
Jose Leon GUERRA; Maria Del Soccorro Guerra, Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 04-70823.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 6, 2006 .
Filed Nov. 14, 2006.
Carlos Antonio Guerra, Las Vegas, NV, pro se.
Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, District Director, Immigration & Naturalization Service, Phoenix, AZ, Linda S. Wernery, Esq., William C. Peachey, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: LEAVY, GOULD, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Jose Leon Guerra and his wife Maria del Soccorro Guerra, natives and citizens of Guatemala, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order affirming an immigration judge's ("IJ") order denying their application for asylum and withholding of removal, and denying their motion to remand to apply for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Petitioners have failed to address, and therefore have waived any challenge to, the BIA's determinations that the IJ properly denied relief and that remand was unwarranted. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259 (9th Cir.1996) (stating that issues not supported by argument are deemed abandoned).
Petitioners' contention that the BIA failed to address the record and deprived them of due process is not supported by the record and is not persuasive.
Petitioners' remaining contentions also lack merit.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.