Case Name: Kunta K. REDD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Eric WILSON, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-11-21
Citations: 703 F. App'x 196
Docket Number: No. 17-7266
Parties: Kunta K. REDD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Eric WILSON, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 703
Pages: 196–196

Head Matter:
Kunta K. REDD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Eric WILSON, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 17-7266
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: November 16, 2017
Decided: November 21, 2017
Kunta K, Redd, Appellant Pro Se.
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kunta K. Redd, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Redd has failed to satisfy his burden of demonstrating that 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) is an inadequate or ineffective means of challenging the validity of his detention. See Rice v. Rivera, 617 F.3d 802, 807 (4th Cir. 2010); United States v. Poole, 531 F.3d 263, 267 n.7 (4th Cir. 2008). The district court lacked jurisdiction over Redd's petition, Rice, 617 F.3d at 807, and we therefore grant leave to proceed in forma pau-peris, modify the district court's order, Redd v. Wilson, No. 3:17-cv-00393-JAG-RCY (E.D. Va. Sept. 14, 2017), to reflect a dismissal without prejudice, and affirm the dismissal as modified, 28 U.S.C. § 2106 (2012). We deny Redd's motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED