Case Name: Woodall v. Swift & Company
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1922-12-12
Citations: 29 Ga. App. 261
Docket Number: 13757
Parties: Woodall v. Swift & Company.
Judges: Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 29
Pages: 261–261

Head Matter:
13757.
Woodall v. Swift & Company.
Decided December 12, 1922.
Foreclosure of mortgage; from Lamar superior court — Judge - Searcy. May 19, 1922.
Cr. D. Dominick, for plaintiff in error.
Reagan & Reagan, contra.

Opinion:
Luke, J.
1. There was no conflict in the evidence, and it demanded a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. It was therefore not error for the court to direct such a verdict.
2. The ground of the motion for a new trial which complains of the exclusion of evidence is without merit. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.