Case Name: Joseph JOHNSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jane and/or John DOES, Director of the California Board of Prison Term BPT; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-06-12
Citations: 234 F. App'x 543
Docket Number: No. 07-55125
Parties: Joseph JOHNSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jane and/or John DOES, Director of the California Board of Prison Term BPT; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 234
Pages: 543–543

Head Matter:
Joseph JOHNSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jane and/or John DOES, Director of the California Board of Prison Term BPT; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 07-55125.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 4, 2007.
Filed June 12, 2007.
Joseph Johnson, Jr., Atascadero, CA, pro se.
Randall R. Murphy, Esq., Office of the California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: LEAVY, RYMER and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
We have reviewed appellant's response to this court's April 10, 2007 order to show cause and conclude that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 698 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.