Case Name: Milaudi KARBOAU, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-12-10
Citations: 114 F. App'x 885
Docket Number: No. 03-35611; D.C. No. CV-02-01605-AJB/JMS
Parties: Milaudi KARBOAU, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before GOODWIN, WALLACE, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 114
Pages: 885–885

Head Matter:
Milaudi KARBOAU, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
No. 03-35611.
D.C. No. CV-02-01605-AJB/JMS.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 6, 2004.
Decided Dec. 10, 2004.
Milaudi Karboau, TRCI — Two Rivers Correctional Institution, Umatilla, OR, pro se.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon; Anna J. Brown, District Judge, Presiding.
Before GOODWIN, WALLACE, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Oregon State prisoner Milaudi Karboau appeals pro se the district court's judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that an employee of the Oregon Department of Motor Vehicles entrapped him into committing the offense of identity theft, and that an Oregon Deputy Sheriff violated his constitutional rights in assessing his eligibility for a pretrial release program and by questioning him outside the presence of his attorney. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.2000), and we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's orders dated January 22, 2003 and March 20, 2003.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.