Case Name: CITY OF ORLANDO, Appellant, v. Carlus L. HAYNES and Carlos M. Romero, Appellees.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2019-02-05
Citations: 263 So. 3d 285
Docket Number: Case No. 5D18-953
Parties: CITY OF ORLANDO, Appellant,
v.
Carlus L. HAYNES and Carlos M. Romero, Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 263
Pages: 285–285

Head Matter:
CITY OF ORLANDO, Appellant,
v.
Carlus L. HAYNES and Carlos M. Romero, Appellees.
Case No. 5D18-953
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Opinion filed February 5, 2019
Derek J. Angell, of O'Connor & O'Connor, LLC, Orlando, for Appellant.
Carlus L. Haynes, of Law Office of Haynes and Laurent, P.A., Orlando, pro se, and Bradley N. Laurent, of Law Office of Haynes and Laurent, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.
No Appearance for Appellee, Carlos M. Romero.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Hayes v. State, 94 So.3d 452, 461 (Fla. 2012) ("[T]he proper remedy when the trial court fails to abide by its duty under the Melbourne[ v. State, 679 So.2d 759 (Fla. 1996) ] procedure is to reverse and remand for a new trial.").
EVANDER, C.J. and GROSSHANS and SASSO, JJ., concur.