Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jerome J. Watkins, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2001-06-08
Citations: 284 A.D.2d 905
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jerome J. Watkins, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 284
Pages: 905–906

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jerome J. Watkins, Appellant.
[726 NYS2d 513]

Opinion:
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that his .conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.39 [1]) must be reversed because the People failed to disprove his agency defense beyond a reasonable doubt. We disagree. The evidence is legally sufficient to establish that defendant was the seller of a controlled substance and not an agent of the buyer (see, People v Richards, 275 AD2d 886, 887, lv denied 96 NY2d 738; People v Trotty, 262 AD2d 337, 338, lv denied 93 NY2d 1028). Defendant actively initiated the sale, thereby exhibiting salesman-like behavior. Furthermore, the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). It cannot be said that, in rejecting the agency defense, the jury failed to give the evidence the weight it should be accorded (see, People v Richards, supra, at 887). (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J. — Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Wisner, Scudder, Kehoe and Burns, JJ.