Case Name: INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION v. GIPSON
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1935-09-27
Citations: 20 Ohio Law Abs. 142
Docket Number: No 2612
Parties: INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION v GIPSON
Judges: FUNK, PJ, and STEVENS, J, concur in jugdment.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 20
Pages: 142–143

Head Matter:
INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION v GIPSON
Ohio Appeals, 9th Dist, Summit Co
No 2612.
Decided Sept 27, 1935
John W. Bricker, Attorney General, Columbus, Herbert W. Mitchell, Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Clairsville, and Herman E. Werner, Prosecuting Atty., Akron, for plaintiff in error.
Cerrezin & Wilson, Cleveland, and H. N. Van Berg, Akron, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
OPINION
By WASHBURN, J.
After carefully reading the record and considering it, we are unanimously of the opinion that reasonable minds could reasonably reach but one conclusion, and that is that the husband of Thelma Gipson did not receive any injury in the course of and arising out of his employment which had any causal effect upon or connection with his death.
This conclusion seems so plain to us that we think it would be impossible for any unbiased person to come to any other conclusion, and therefore the judgment in this case is reversed, and final judgment entered for the plaintiff in error.
FUNK, PJ, and STEVENS, J, concur in jugdment.