Case Name: George ROLAND, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Burl CAIN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-05-30
Citations: 183 F. App'x 440
Docket Number: No. 05-30432
Parties: George ROLAND, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Burl CAIN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before JOLLY, DAVIS and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 183
Pages: 440–440

Head Matter:
George ROLAND, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Burl CAIN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 05-30432.
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Decided May 30, 2006.
George Roland, Jr., Louisiana Department of Public Safety & Corrections David Wade Correctional Center, Homer, LA, for Petitioner-Appellant.
Catherine M. Estopinal, Assistant District Attorney, District Attorney’s Office for the Parish of Caddo, Shreveport, LA, for Respondent-Appellee.
Before JOLLY, DAVIS and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
George Roland, Jr., Louisiana prisoner # 121494, appeals from the district court's denial of his "Motion and Order to Proceed with Petitioner's Jury Demand Pursuant to FRCVP Rule 38 in Petitioner's 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 action." Roland contends that he is entitled to proceed with the § 1983 action he filed with his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition in November 1990.
The record does not reflect that Roland filed a § 1983 action with his § 2254 petition in November 1990. The motion he appeals, which was filed 12 years after his first habeas proceeding concluded, is an unauthorized motion. See United States v. Early, 27 F.3d 140, 142 (5th Cir.1994). Accordingly, his appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See id.
APPEAL DISMISSED; REQUEST FOR A "CERTIFICATE OF PROBABLE CAUSE" DENIED AS UNNECESSARY.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.