Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lincoln Monroe BROCK, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-01-24
Citations: 261 F. App'x 530
Docket Number: No. 07-7266
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lincoln Monroe BROCK, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 261
Pages: 530–531

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lincoln Monroe BROCK, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-7266.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 17, 2008.
Decided: Jan. 24, 2008.
Lincoln Monroe Brock, Appellant Pro Se. Randall Stuart Galyon, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Lincoln Monroe Brock appeals the district court's order denying his Fed. R.Crim. Pro. 33 motion for a new trial predicated on newly discovered evidence. We have reviewed the record and find the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Brock's motion. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Brock, No. 1:03-cr-00429-JAB (M.D.N.C., Aug. 10, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED