Case Name: Joseph A. Spiro, Appellant, v. Mortimer J. Einziger, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1944-06-29
Citations: 182 Misc. 120
Docket Number: 
Parties: Joseph A. Spiro, Appellant, v. Mortimer J. Einziger, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 182
Pages: 120–121

Head Matter:
Joseph A. Spiro, Appellant, v. Mortimer J. Einziger, Respondent.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
June 29, 1944.
Carl D. Isaacs for appellant.
Albert E. Seligman for respondent.

Opinion:
Memorandum Per Curiam.
Upon the entry of the order of interpleader the action became one in equity (Clark v. Mosher, 107 N. Y. 118, 122; Levy v. Niklad, 259 App. Div. 54) and the court below was therewith divested of all jurisdiction to deter.mine which of the claimants was entitled to be paid the fund in controversy.
The judgment should be reversed on the law, without costs, and complaint dismissed, without prejudice to the rights of any of the parties. •
MacCrate, Smith and Steinbbink, JJ., concur.
Judgment reversed, etc.