Case Name: Bryan S. BEHRENS, for Bryan BEH-RENS, Michelle Behrens and children of the Behrens', Bryan Behrens as a receivership entity, Plaintiff-Appellant v. GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC, and it's successors Ocwen Loan Servicing, third party collectors and service providers for U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee for Ramp 2006 NC2, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-08-14
Citations: 566 F. App'x 546
Docket Number: No. 14-1020
Parties: Bryan S. BEHRENS, for Bryan BEH-RENS, Michelle Behrens and children of the Behrens’, Bryan Behrens as a receivership entity, Plaintiff-Appellant v. GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC, and it’s successors Ocwen Loan Servicing, third party collectors and service providers for U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee for Ramp 2006 NC2, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before WOLLMAN, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 566
Pages: 546–547

Head Matter:
Bryan S. BEHRENS, for Bryan BEH-RENS, Michelle Behrens and children of the Behrens’, Bryan Behrens as a receivership entity, Plaintiff-Appellant v. GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC, and it’s successors Ocwen Loan Servicing, third party collectors and service providers for U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee for Ramp 2006 NC2, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 14-1020.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 7, 2014.
Filed: Aug. 14, 2014.
Bryan S. Behrens, for Bryan Behrens, Michelle Behrens and Children of the Beh-rens’, Bryan Behrens as a Receivership Entity, Terre Haute, IN, pro se.
Before WOLLMAN, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Bryan Behrens appeals the district court's preservice dismissal of his civil complaint, in which he alleged that the lender and servicer on a mortgage encumbering certain property were violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act by foreclosing on the property, and that the foreclosure proceedings violated a court order in a separate receivership case. Upon careful de novo review, we conclude that dismissal was proper for the reasons explained by the district court; and we reject without discussion the arguments raised on appeal. The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable John M. Gerrard, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.