Case Name: Walter H. WARD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2012-12-26
Citations: 103 So. 3d 273
Docket Number: No. 3D12-2917
Parties: Walter H. WARD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before CORTIÑAS, FERNANDEZ and LOGUE, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 103
Pages: 273–274

Head Matter:
Walter H. WARD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D12-2917.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 26, 2012.
William Earl Ploss, Miami, for appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Natalia Costea, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before CORTIÑAS, FERNANDEZ and LOGUE, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); see also Nelson v. State, 875 So.2d 579, 583 (Fla.2004) ("Under the circumstances of this case, a defendant would be required to allege what testimony defense counsel could have elicited from witnesses and how defense counsel's failure to call, interview, or present the witnesses who would have so testified prejudiced the case.").