Case Name: OHIO CELLULAR PRODUCTS CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Donald E. Nelson, Third Party Defendant/Fourth Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ADAMS USA, INC., Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee, and Apehead Manufacturing, Inc., Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Patrick J. Arnold, Jr. and Robert Fieseler, Fourth Party Defendants-Appellees, and James E. Lammy, Sr., Fourth Party Defendant-Appellee, and Robert F. Rywalski, Fourth Party Defendant-Appellee. Ohio Cellular Products Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, and Donald E. Nelson, Third Party Defendant/Fourth Party Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Adams Usa, Inc., Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee, and Apehead Manufacturing, Inc., Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Patrick J. Arnold, Jr. and Robert Fieseler, Fourth Party Defendants-Appellees, and James E. Lammy, Sr., Fourth Party Defendant-Appellant, and Robert F. Rywalski, Fourth Party Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-06-10
Citations: 38 F. App'x 595
Docket Number: No. 02-1079, 02-1168
Parties: OHIO CELLULAR PRODUCTS CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Donald E. Nelson, Third Party Defendant/Fourth Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ADAMS USA, INC., Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee, and Apehead Manufacturing, Inc., Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Patrick J. Arnold, Jr. and Robert Fieseler, Fourth Party Defendants-Appellees, and James E. Lammy, Sr., Fourth Party Defendant-Appellee, and Robert F. Rywalski, Fourth Party Defendant-Appellee. Ohio Cellular Products Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, and Donald E. Nelson, Third Party Defendant/Fourth Party Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Adams Usa, Inc., Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee, and Apehead Manufacturing, Inc., Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Patrick J. Arnold, Jr. and Robert Fieseler, Fourth Party Defendants-Appellees, and James E. Lammy, Sr., Fourth Party Defendant-Appellant, and Robert F. Rywalski, Fourth Party Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 38
Pages: 595–596

Head Matter:
OHIO CELLULAR PRODUCTS CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Donald E. Nelson, Third Party Defendant/Fourth Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ADAMS USA, INC., Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee, and Apehead Manufacturing, Inc., Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Patrick J. Arnold, Jr. and Robert Fieseler, Fourth Party Defendants-Appellees, and James E. Lammy, Sr., Fourth Party Defendant-Appellee, and Robert F. Rywalski, Fourth Party Defendant-Appellee. Ohio Cellular Products Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, and Donald E. Nelson, Third Party Defendant/Fourth Party Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Adams Usa, Inc., Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee, and Apehead Manufacturing, Inc., Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Patrick J. Arnold, Jr. and Robert Fieseler, Fourth Party Defendants-Appellees, and James E. Lammy, Sr., Fourth Party Defendant-Appellant, and Robert F. Rywalski, Fourth Party Defendant-Appellee.
No. 02-1079, 02-1168.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
June 10, 2002.

Opinion:
ON MOTION
SCHALL, Circuit Judge.
ORDER
Ohio Cellular Products Corporation and Donald E. Nelson state that they are not challenging the judgments in favor of Patrick J. Arnold, Jr. and Robert Fieseler, Robert F. Rywalski, and James E. Lam-my, Sr. in the context of their appeal, 02-1079. Lammy moves to voluntarily dismiss his appeal, 02-1168.
Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) The motion to voluntarily dismiss appeal no. 02-1168 is granted.
(2) Each side shall bear its own costs in 02-1168.
(3) The revised official caption for 02-1079 is reflected above.
Arnold, Fieseler, Lammy, and Rywalski should inform the court whether they intend to participate in the remaining appeal, 02-1079.