Case Name: Marvin A.H. FREIMAN, Appellant, v. Jay HIRSCH, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1983-11-15
Citations: 441 So. 2d 1146
Docket Number: No. 83-837
Parties: Marvin A.H. FREIMAN, Appellant, v. Jay HIRSCH, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARK-DULL and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 441
Pages: 1146–1146

Head Matter:
Marvin A.H. FREIMAN, Appellant, v. Jay HIRSCH, Appellee.
No. 83-837.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 15, 1983.
Myers, Kenin, Levinson, Ruffner, Frank & Richards and Terry V. Percy, Miami, for appellant.
No appearance for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARK-DULL and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The complaint does not allege a basis for subjecting the defendant-appellant Marvin A.H. Freiman, a New York attorney, to service under the Florida long-arm statute, and his unrebutted affidavit affirmatively shows that no such basis exists. Investors Associates, Inc. v. Moss, 441 So.2d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Hyco Manufacturing Co. v. Rotex International Corp., 355 So.2d 471 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Nichols v. Seabreeze Properties, Inc., 302 So.2d 139 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974). The order denying his motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction over his person is therefore reversed.