Case Name: James J. Mead, Appellant-Respondent, v. Karen E. Bloom et al., Defendants, and Hallman Adkins Chevrolet, Respondent-Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1983-11-23
Citations: 60 N.Y.2d 926
Docket Number: 
Parties: James J. Mead, Appellant-Respondent, v Karen E. Bloom et al., Defendants, and Hallman Adkins Chevrolet, Respondent-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 60
Pages: 926–927

Head Matter:
James J. Mead, Appellant-Respondent, v Karen E. Bloom et al., Defendants, and Hallman Adkins Chevrolet, Respondent-Appellant.
Submitted October 17, 1983;
decided November 23, 1983

Opinion:
Motion to dismiss cross appeal taken by Hallman Adkins Chevrolet granted and said cross appeal dismissed, with costs and $20 costs of motion, upon the ground that cross-appellant is not aggrieved by the modification at the Appellate Division (CPLR 5601, subd [a], par [iii]).