Case Name: The Coca-Cola Company, a corporation of the State of Delaware, Complainant Below, Appellant, vs. Loft, Inc., a corporation of the State of Delaware, Defendant Below, Appellee; The Coca-Cola Company, a corporation of the State of Delaware, Complainant Below, Appellant, vs. Happiness Candy Stores, Inc., a corporation of the State of Delaware, Defendant Below, Appellant
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Delaware
Decision Date: 1935-05-13
Citations: 20 Del. Ch. 456
Docket Number: 
Parties: The Coca-Cola Company, a corporation of the State of Delaware, Complainant Below, Appellant, vs. Loft, Inc., a corporation of the State of Delaware, Defendant Below, Appellee. The Coca-Cola Company, a corporation of the State of Delaware, Complainant Below, Appellant, vs. Happiness Candy Stores, Inc., a corporation of the State of Delaware, Defendant Below, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Delaware Chancery Reports
Volume: 20
Pages: 456–457

Head Matter:
The Coca-Cola Company, a corporation of the State of Delaware, Complainant Below, Appellant, vs. Loft, Inc., a corporation of the State of Delaware, Defendant Below, Appellee. The Coca-Cola Company, a corporation of the State of Delaware, Complainant Below, Appellant, vs. Happiness Candy Stores, Inc., a corporation of the State of Delaware, Defendant Below, Appellant.
Supreme Court,
On Appeal, May 13, 1935.
Layton, C. J., Harrington, Richards, Rodney and Reinhardt, JJ., sitting.
Hugh M. Morris, and Edward S. Rogers and James F. Hogue, both of New York City, and Harold Hirsch, Frank Troutman and Roy S. Jones, of Atlanta, Georgia, for appellants.
Aaron Finger, of the firm of Richards, Layton and Finger, and Arthur F. Driscoll, of the firm of O’Brien, Driscoll and Rafferty, of New York City, for appellees.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
For the reasons given in the clear and convincing opinion of the Chancellor, 19 Del. Ch. 292, 167 A. 900, the judgments below are affirmed.