Case Name: THE FLORIDA BAR. In re FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1977-06-28
Citations: 347 So. 2d 434
Docket Number: No. 49355-B
Parties: THE FLORIDA BAR. In re FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.
Judges: OVERTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, ENGLAND, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and KARL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 347
Pages: 434–435

Head Matter:
THE FLORIDA BAR. In re FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.
No. 49355-B.
Supreme Court of Florida.
June 28, 1977.
Edward J. Atkins, Miami, President and Marshall R. Cassedy, Tallahassee, Executive Director, for The Florida Bar.
Benjamin M. Tench, Gainesville, Chairman for Criminal Procedure Rules Committee, Petitioner.
Bruce M. Lyons of Di Giulian, Spellacy, Bernstein, Lyons & Sanders, Fort Lauder-dale, for the Academy of Florida Trial Lawyers.
Peter L. Nimkoff of August, Nimkoff & Pohlig, Miami, for the Dade County Bar Ass’n.
Thomas J. Morgan and Gerald Kogan, Miami, for the Florida Criminal Defense Attorneys Ass’n.
Arthur I. Jacobs, Fernandina Beach, for the Florida Pros. Attorneys Ass’n.
Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender for Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida.
James G. Mahorner, Tallahassee, for Dept, of Health and Rehabilitative Services.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Rule 3.125(m), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure (343 So.2d 1247 (Fla. 1977)), refers to the "Schedule of Witnesses and Evidence for Notice to Appear." The form was omitted.
The "Schedule of Witnesses and Evidence for Notice to Appear" shall be in substantially the attached form.
Rule 3.125(m), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, supra, is amended by adding the attached form.
It is so ordered.
OVERTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, ENGLAND, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and KARL, JJ., concur.