Case Name: Filippo Pino et al., Respondents, v. Kurt Harnischfeger, Also Known as Kurt H. Harnischfeger, Individually and Doing Business as Jacobson Development, Also Known as Jacobsen Development, Defendant, and DDS Engineers, LLP, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2007-07-18
Citations: 42 A.D.3d 985
Docket Number: Appeal No. 3
Parties: Filippo Pino et al., Respondents, v Kurt Harnischfeger, Also Known as Kurt H. Harnischfeger, Individually and Doing Business as Jacobson Development, Also Known as Jacobsen Development, Defendant, and DDS Engineers, LLP, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 42
Pages: 985–985

Head Matter:
Filippo Pino et al., Respondents, v Kurt Harnischfeger, Also Known as Kurt H. Harnischfeger, Individually and Doing Business as Jacobson Development, Also Known as Jacobsen Development, Defendant, and DDS Engineers, LLP, Appellant.
(Appeal No. 3.)
[838 NYS2d 795]

Opinion:
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Kenneth R. Fisher, J.), entered August 2, 2006. The order, among other things, denied the motion of defendant DDS Engineers, LLP for reargument/ renewal and granted plaintiffs' cross motion to dismiss that defendant's counterclaim and to cancel the notice of pendency filed by that defendant.
It is hereby ordered that said appeal from the order insofar as it denied leave to reargue be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed (see Empire Ins. Co. v Food City, 167 AD2d 983, 984 [1990]) and the order is affirmed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Pino v Harnischfeger (42 AD3d 980 [2007]). Present — Gorski, J.E, Smith, Centra, Lunn and Fahey, JJ.