Case Name: Naarl RICHARD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. J. Al CANNON, Jr., Respondent-Appellee, and Matthew J. Modica, USASC; James R. Duffy, DEA US, Respondents
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-02-03
Citations: 463 F. App'x 234
Docket Number: No. 11-7364
Parties: Naarl RICHARD, Petitioner—Appellant, v. J. Al CANNON, Jr., Respondent—Appellee, and Matthew J. Modica, USASC; James R. Duffy, DEA US, Respondents.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 463
Pages: 234–235

Head Matter:
Naarl RICHARD, Petitioner—Appellant, v. J. Al CANNON, Jr., Respondent—Appellee, and Matthew J. Modica, USASC; James R. Duffy, DEA US, Respondents.
No. 11-7364.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 31, 2012.
Decided: Feb. 3, 2012.
Naarl Richard, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Naarl Richard, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's report and recommendation and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2011) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Richard v. Cannon, No. 0:11-cv-01192-JFA (D.S.C. Oct. 5, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.