Case Name: Elizabeth PETERS, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. M & M FREIGHT TRANSPORT, INC., and Paul David Morgan, Defendants, and Memorial Hospitals Association, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2008-09-23
Citations: 269 S.W.3d 460
Docket Number: No. ED 90432
Parties: Elizabeth PETERS, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. M & M FREIGHT TRANSPORT, INC., and Paul David Morgan, Defendants, and Memorial Hospitals Association, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before BOOKER T. SHAW, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and MARY K. HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 269
Pages: 460–460

Head Matter:
Elizabeth PETERS, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. M & M FREIGHT TRANSPORT, INC., and Paul David Morgan, Defendants, and Memorial Hospitals Association, Defendant/Respondent.
No. ED 90432.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Sept. 23, 2008.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 3, 2008.
Application for Transfer Denied Dec. 16, 2008.
Dale M. Weppner, Greensfelder, Hemker <& Gale, P.C., St. Louis, MO, Daniel M. Czamanske, Jr., Chapman, Lewis & Swan, Clarksdale, MS, for appellant.
Joseph R. Swift, T. Michael Ward, Teresa M. Young, Brown & James, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Victor T. Avellino, Boggs, Boggs & Bates, L.L.C., Clayton, MO, for defendants.
Before BOOKER T. SHAW, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and MARY K. HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff appeals from an adverse judgment in a declaratory judgment action. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).