Case Name: MOON MOTOR CAR CO. v. CENT. STORG. & WARE. CO.
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1927-01-04
Citations: 5 Ohio Law Abs. 76
Docket Number: No. 20245
Parties: MOON MOTOR CAR CO. v. CENT. STORG. & WARE. CO.
Judges: 
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 5
Pages: 76–76

Head Matter:
MOON MOTOR CAR CO. v. CENT. STORG. & WARE. CO.
No. 20245.
Supreme Court
Dock. Jan. 4, 1927,
5 Abs. 27.
Attorneys — Stearns, Chamberlain & Royon for Car Co.; Quigley & Byrnes for Warehouse Co.; al lof Cleveland.

Opinion:
The Moon Motor Co. contends in the Supreme Court that a warehouseman is liable when car is damaged by water freezing in the cooling system in spite of the facts that said warehouseman was protected by a clause in the receipt as to frozen batteries and that evidence was introduced to show that it was not the custom of the trade to take precautions against freezing.