Case Name: Charles E. HINTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Amy M. SIFFORD; Richard W. Jacobsen, Jr.; Patrick M. Martin; Ramona Masterton, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-05-03
Citations: 11 F. App'x 208
Docket Number: No. 00-7788
Parties: Charles E. HINTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Amy M. SIFFORD; Richard W. Jacobsen, Jr.; Patrick M. Martin; Ramona Masterton, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 11
Pages: 208–208

Head Matter:
Charles E. HINTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Amy M. SIFFORD; Richard W. Jacobsen, Jr.; Patrick M. Martin; Ramona Masterton, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 00-7788.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 27, 2001.
Decided May 3, 2001.
Charles E. Hinton, pro se.
Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Charles E. Hinton appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Hinton v. Sifford, No. CA-00-541-1-3-MU (W.D.N.C. Nov. 15, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.