Case Name: Marilyn ALTIZER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOWN OF CEDAR BLUFF VIRGINIA; James K. McGlothlin, individually and in his official capacity as Town Manager, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-11-05
Citations: 621 F. App'x 248
Docket Number: No. 15-1514
Parties: Marilyn ALTIZER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOWN OF CEDAR BLUFF VIRGINIA; James K. McGlothlin, individually and in his official capacity as Town Manager, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 621
Pages: 248–248

Head Matter:
Marilyn ALTIZER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOWN OF CEDAR BLUFF VIRGINIA; James K. McGlothlin, individually and in his official capacity as Town Manager, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15-1514.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 30, 2015.
Decided: Nov. 5, 2015.
Michael A. Bragg, Bragg Law, PLC, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellant. W. Bradford Stallard, Penn, Stuart & Esk-ridge, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Marilyn Altizer appeals the district court's order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the claims raised in the parties' briefs and the record on appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Altizer v. Town of Cedar Bluff Va., No. 1:14-cv-00007-JPJ-PMS, — F.Supp.3d -, 2015 WL 1754679 (W.D.Va. Apr. 17, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.