Case Name: Roger Dean LEWIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1986-11-18
Citations: 497 So. 2d 1162
Docket Number: No. 85-1761
Parties: Roger Dean LEWIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before BASKIN, FERGUSON and JOR-GENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 497
Pages: 1162–1165

Head Matter:
Roger Dean LEWIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 85-1761.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 18, 1986.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Elliot H. Scherker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Richard E. Doran, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before BASKIN, FERGUSON and JOR-GENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant alleges, and we agree, that the State failed to provide him with evidence favorable to his defense. However, we find no violation of discovery rights as enunciated in Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), because there is no showing of a reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed, the result of the proceeding would have been different. United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667, 105 S.Ct. 3375, 3384-85, 87 L.Ed.2d 481, 494-95 (1985). Cf Arango v. State, 497 So.2d 1161 (Fla.1986) (court found a reasonable probability that results of the proceedings would have been different had suppressed evidence been disclosed).
Affirmed.
BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ., concur.