Case Name: In the Matter of Edwin Madden, Appellant, v. Charles Hynes et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2014-07-09
Citations: 119 A.D.3d 689
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Edwin Madden, Appellant, v Charles Hynes et al., Respondents.
Judges: Mastro, J.E, Dickerson, Hinds-Radix and Duffy, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 119
Pages: 689–689

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Edwin Madden, Appellant, v Charles Hynes et al., Respondents.
[989 NYS2d 620]

Opinion:
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, for a judgment directing the respondent Brian Fischer, Commissioner of the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, to calculate the sentence imposed on the petitioner on a judgment rendered against him on November 16, 1994, in the Supreme Court, Kings County, as running concurrently with a certain sentence imposed on the petitioner in Massachusetts, and to credit the petitioner "for the time he served on [the] Massachusetts sentence against his New York sentence," the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kiings County (Miller, J.), dated May 11, 2010, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Supreme Court properly denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding. The petitioner failed to establish his entitlement, inter alia, to a judgment directing the respondent Brian Fischer, Commissioner of the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, to calculate the sentence imposed on the petitioner on a judgment rendered against him on November 16, 1994, in the Supreme Court, Kings County, as running concurrently with a certain sentence imposed on the petitioner in Massachusetts (see Fenal Law § 70.25 [4]; People v Fryar, 268 AD2d 595, 596 [2000]; see also Cachoian v New York State Dept. of Corrections, 239 AD2d 118, 119 [1997]).
The petitioner's contentions regarding a July 1, 2010, order of the Supreme Court, Bungs County, are not properly before this Court (see CFLR 5515 [1]; see also Wenzel v 16302 Jamaica Ave., LLC, 115 AD3d 852 [2014]; W Park Assoc., Inc. v Everest Natl. Ins. Co., 113 AD3d 38, 44 [2013]).
Mastro, J.E, Dickerson, Hinds-Radix and Duffy, JJ., concur.