Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Franklin Alexander RODRIGUEZ-DIAZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-10-08
Citations: 295 F. App'x 680
Docket Number: No. 08-50287
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Franklin Alexander RODRIGUEZ-DIAZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 295
Pages: 680–680

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Franklin Alexander RODRIGUEZ-DIAZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-50287
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Oct. 8, 2008.
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Henry Joseph Bemporad, Donna F. Coltharp, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Texas San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before JOLLY, BARKSDALE, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Franklin Alexander Rodriguez-Diaz raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir.2007), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 128 S.Ct. 872, 169 L.Ed.2d 737 (2008). The Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.