Case Name: Richard L. TROMBLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-04-26
Citations: 541 So. 2d 798
Docket Number: No. 88-0662
Parties: Richard L. TROMBLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ANSTEAD, LETTS and GARRETT, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 541
Pages: 798–798

Head Matter:
Richard L. TROMBLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 88-0662.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
April 26, 1989.
Harry Gulkin of Harry Gulkin, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Alfonso M. Saldana, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
As to the admissibility of the tape recordings, we affirm upon the authority of Odum v. State, 403 So.2d 936 (Fla.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 925, 102 S.Ct.1970, 72 L.Ed.2d 440 (1982), Tumulty v. State, 489 So.2d 150 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986), and section 934.03(l)(c), Florida Statutes (1985).
As to the admissibility of the "battered woman syndrome" evidence, we affirm upon the authority of Kruse v. State, 483 So.2d 1383 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986), rev. dismissed, 507 So.2d 588 (Fla.1987), Terry v. State, 467 So.2d 761, 764 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), rev. denied, 476 So.2d 675 (Fla.1985), and State v. Ciskie, 110 Wash.2d 263, 268, 751 P.2d 1165, 1170 (1988).
As to the imposition of consecutive sentences, we affirm upon the authority of Murray v. State, 491 So.2d 1120 (Fla.1986).
ANSTEAD, LETTS and GARRETT, JJ., concur.