Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos Alberto GIRALDO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-07-24
Citations: 190 F. App'x 581
Docket Number: No. 05-50442
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Carlos Alberto GIRALDO, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: B. FLETCHER, TROTT, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 190
Pages: 581–582

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Carlos Alberto GIRALDO, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 05-50442.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 15, 2006.
Decided July 24, 2006.
John Kraemer, U.S. Attorney, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Zaki Zehawi, Esq., Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: B. FLETCHER, TROTT, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Carlos Alberto Giraldo appeals from the fourteen-month sentence imposed for violation of conditions of supervised release, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Giraldo argues the imposition of supervised release increased the maximum penalty provided by the statute of conviction and thereby violated his Sixth Amendment rights. Giraldo's argument is precluded by United States v. Huertas-Pimental, 445 F.3d 1220,1224 (9th Cir.2006).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.