Case Name: LONG DOCK COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. STATE BOARD OF TAXES AND ASSESSMENT, ETC., RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1917-05-24
Citations: 90 N.J.L. 702
Docket Number: 
Parties: LONG DOCK COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. STATE BOARD OF TAXES AND ASSESSMENT, ETC., RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 90
Pages: 702–702

Head Matter:
LONG DOCK COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. STATE BOARD OF TAXES AND ASSESSMENT, ETC., RESPONDENT.
Argued March 13, 1917
Decided May 24, 1917.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 89 N. J. L. 108.
(In re reassessments on second-class property for 1912.)
For the appellant, Collins & Gorlin.
For the respondent, John W. Wescott, attorney-general, John Bentley and John B. Hardin.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review will be affirmed^ for the reasons given in the per curiam in Long Dock Co. v. State Board of Taxes and Assessment, &c., No. 48 of the present term of this court.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Black, White, Heprenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 11.
For reversal—None.