Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rennie Otis PRICE, a/k/a Ronnie Otis Price, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-01-20
Citations: 424 F. App'x 193
Docket Number: No. 09-6892
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rennie Otis PRICE, a/k/a Ronnie Otis Price, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 424
Pages: 193–193

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rennie Otis PRICE, a/k/a Ronnie Otis Price, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-6892.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 14, 2010.
Decided: Jan. 20, 2010.
Rennie Otis Price, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher John Romano, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Rennie Otis Price appeals the district court's order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. Price argues that he should have received a lower sentence after application of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). This claim is without merit. See United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247, 251-53 (4th Cir.) (holding that Booker does not apply in § 3582 proceedings), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 129 S.Ct. 2401, 173 L.Ed.2d 1296 (2009). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.