Case Name: Anthonique PAMPHILE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2013-02-08
Citations: 113 So. 3d 949
Docket Number: No. 5D12-679
Parties: Anthonique PAMPHILE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ORFINGER, C.J., PALMER and BERGER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 113
Pages: 949–950

Head Matter:
Anthonique PAMPHILE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D12-679.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Feb. 8, 2013.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and David S. Morgan, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Anthony J. Golden, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Ap-pellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
See Williams v. State, 768 So.2d 1281, 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) ("Given the overwhelming evidence of guilt adduced by the state, we cannot find that the denial of the appellant's motion for a continuance during trial, in order to locate a defense witness, caused any material prejudice to the appellant particularly when it is unknown whether the witnesses' testimony would have been favorable to the appellant.").
AFFIRMED.
ORFINGER, C.J., PALMER and BERGER, JJ., concur.