Case Name: Millicent Allen v. Neil T. Allen
Court: Vermont Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Vermont
Decision Date: 1994-04-15
Citations: 161 Vt. 526
Docket Number: No. 92-220
Parties: Millicent Allen v. Neil T. Allen
Judges: Present: Allen, C.J., Gibson, Dooley, Morse and Johnson, JJ.
Reporter: Vermont Reports
Volume: 161
Pages: 526–543

Head Matter:
Millicent Allen v. Neil T. Allen
[641 A.2d 1332]
No. 92-220
Present: Allen, C.J., Gibson, Dooley, Morse and Johnson, JJ.
Opinion Filed April 15, 1994
Geoffrey Judd Vitt of Brooks, McNally, Whittington, Platto & Vitt, Norwich, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Ernest P. Sachs, Norwich, for Defendant-Appellee.

Opinion:
Allen, C J.
The issue on appeal is whether the family court erred in ruling that the postnuptial agreement bars the plaintiff from collecting interest on the note. That is the only issue briefed and argued by the parties, and the resolution in this Court should be confined to an answer to that question. Because I agree with my associates that the trial court's conclusion was erroneous in that respect, I would reverse and remand the matter for such further proceedings as the parties and court deem appropriate.
Reversed and remanded.