Case Name: Thomas Shane HERNDON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2006-10-04
Citations: 939 So. 2d 172
Docket Number: No. 4D06-2307
Parties: Thomas Shane HERNDON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: STEVENSON, C.J., FARMER and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 939
Pages: 172–173

Head Matter:
Thomas Shane HERNDON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D06-2307.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Oct. 4, 2006.
Thomas Shane Herndon, Sneads, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm without prejudice to appellant raising issue III in a timely rule 3.850 motion. See Patterson v. State, 904 So.2d 593 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005); Keifner v. State, 896 So.2d 955 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005); Zuluaga v. State, 793 So.2d 60 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). As in Patterson, "[w]e do not have a sufficient record to determine whether, if appellant does file a rule 3.850 motion, it would be successive under rule 3.850(f), and this opinion should not be construed as deciding that issue." Id. at 593; Keifner, 896 So.2d at 956.
STEVENSON, C.J., FARMER and GROSS, JJ., concur.