Case Name: James Allen CUNNINGHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-12-14
Citations: 570 So. 2d 1147
Docket Number: No. 89-3128
Parties: James Allen CUNNINGHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ERVIN, WIGGINTON and MINER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 570
Pages: 1147–1148

Head Matter:
James Allen CUNNINGHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 89-3128.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District,
Dec. 14, 1990.
Barbara M. Linthicum, Public Defender and Carl S. McGinnes, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Laura Rush, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. As in Glass v. State, 556 So.2d 465 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), Betsey v. State, 558 So.2d 202 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), Buckley v. State, 558 So.2d 534 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), and Miller v. State, 567 So.2d 1041 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), we certify the following question to the supreme court as one of great public importance:
DOES A DOUBLE JEOPARDY VIOLATION RESULT FROM THE IMPOSITION OF A PROBATIONARY SPLIT SENTENCE WHEN THE LEGISLATURE HAS NOT EXPLICITLY AUTHORIZED THAT DISPOSITION IN THE SENTENCING ALTERNATIVES OF SECTION 921.187, FLORIDA STATUTES?
ERVIN, WIGGINTON and MINER, JJ., concur.