Case Name: Henry K. TOURNEAU and Tourneau, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TISHMAN & LIPP, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1954-02-15
Citations: 211 F.2d 240
Docket Number: No. 186, Docket 22909
Parties: Henry K. TOURNEAU and Tourneau, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TISHMAN & LIPP, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 211
Pages: 240–240

Head Matter:
Henry K. TOURNEAU and Tourneau, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TISHMAN & LIPP, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 186, Docket 22909.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued Feb. 3, 1954.
Decided Feb. 15, 1954.
Harry C. Bierman, New York City, for plaintiffs-appellants.
Sidney G. Faber, New York City (Os-trolenk & Faber and Samuel Ostrolenk, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellee.
Before CLARK, FRANK and HINCKS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We are content to affirm on the fully reasoned opinion of District Judge Lei-bell, 119 F.Supp. 593, holding invalid Design Patent No. Des. 161,296 for "Combined Watchcase and Bracelet" issued to the individual plaintiff on December 19, 1950, and declining to find defendant guilty of unfair competition with plaintiffs in the sale of watchcases and bracelets. If the new patent code, 35 U.S.C. § 103, July 19, 1952, is applicable, the result, we believe, must remain the same.
Affirmed.