Case Name: Thomas R. Tannatt, Respondent, v. Samuel Haines, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1912-05
Citations: 151 A.D. 894
Docket Number: 
Parties: Thomas R. Tannatt, Respondent, v. Samuel Haines, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 151
Pages: 894–894

Head Matter:
Fourth Department,
May, 1912.
Thomas R. Tannatt, Respondent, v. Samuel Haines, Appellant.

Opinion:
Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that reversible error was committed upon the trial by receiving in evidence, first, the alleged newspaper interview with defendant; second, the subsequent transaction between the parties .as to the fourth car of apples; third, the proof in relation to the alleged statute law of the State of Washington relating to commission merchants. All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., who dissented.