Case Name: Maurice DAHL, Gary Clark, W. Grantham, Robert Daniele, Charles Dahl, Dowayne Bockman, Ray Dilbeck, Richard Koon, Art Overgarrd, Jack Yeager, Accra Tronics Seals Corp., and Aaron Heller, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Billy J. "B.J." PINTER, Black Gold Oil Company, Pinter Energy Company, and Pinter Oil Company, Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1988-10-14
Citations: 857 F.2d 262
Docket Number: No. 84-1970
Parties: Maurice DAHL, Gary Clark, W. Grantham, Robert Daniele, Charles Dahl, Dowayne Bockman, Ray Dilbeck, Richard Koon, Art Overgarrd, Jack Yeager, Accra Tronics Seals Corp., and Aaron Heller, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Billy J. “B.J.” PINTER, Black Gold Oil Company, Pinter Energy Company, and Pinter Oil Company, Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: Before BROWN and REAVLEY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 857
Pages: 262–262

Head Matter:
Maurice DAHL, Gary Clark, W. Grantham, Robert Daniele, Charles Dahl, Dowayne Bockman, Ray Dilbeck, Richard Koon, Art Overgarrd, Jack Yeager, Accra Tronics Seals Corp., and Aaron Heller, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Billy J. “B.J.” PINTER, Black Gold Oil Company, Pinter Energy Company, and Pinter Oil Company, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 84-1970.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Oct. 14, 1988.
Braden W. Sparks, Newman, Shook & McManemin, Dallas, Tex., for defendants-appellants.
John A. Spinuzzi, Denton, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellees.
Due to his death on October 19, 1987, Judge Hill did not participate in this decision. This case is being decided by a quorum. 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).

Opinion:
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Before BROWN and REAVLEY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of this court (787 F.2d 985; 794 F.2d 1016) affirming the district court's judgment for plaintiff Dahl has been vacated by the Supreme Court. — U.S.-, 108 S.Ct. 2063, 100 L.Ed.2d 658 (1988). The Court called for further findings to meet the standards it established for determining (1) the availability of an in pan delicto defense under § 12(1) of the Securities Act of 1933, and (2) status as a statutory seller for purposes of imposing liability under § 12(1). The cause is remanded to the district court for further findings consistent with the Supreme Court's holdings and for determination, if appropriate, of contribution to Pinter by Dahh The district court may, if it chooses, take additional evidence on these issues.
REMANDED.