Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Linwood Cola PARKER, a/k/a Lenny, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-05-16
Citations: 428 F. App'x 260
Docket Number: No. 10-7577
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Linwood Cola PARKER, a/k/a Lenny, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 428
Pages: 260–260

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Linwood Cola PARKER, a/k/a Lenny, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 10-7577.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 29, 2011.
Decided: May 16, 2011.
Linwood Cola Parker, Appellant Pro Se. Gurney Wingate Grant, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia; Darryl James Mitchell, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Linwood Cola Parker seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion to recuse or disqualify. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Parker seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.