Case Name: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. James Tommy PEEK, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-04-08
Citations: 616 So. 2d 50
Docket Number: No. 81099
Parties: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. James Tommy PEEK, Respondent.
Judges: BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, MCDONALD, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 616
Pages: 50–50

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. James Tommy PEEK, Respondent.
No. 81099.
Supreme Court of Florida.
April 8, 1993.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and James W. Rogers, Bureau Chief — Criminal Appeals, and Carolyn J. Mosley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for petitioner.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for respondent.

Opinion:
SHAW, Justice.
We have for review Peek v. State, 610 So.2d 5 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), wherein the district court certified a question of great public importance. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We have since answered the question in State v. Rucker, 613 So.2d 460 (Fla.1993). We quash Peek and remand for proceedings consistent with Rucker.
It is so ordered.
BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, MCDONALD, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.