Case Name: CAMPBELL, Respondent, v. JIMENES et al., Appellants
Court: New York City Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1893-10-20
Citations: 25 N.Y.S. 1143
Docket Number: 
Parties: CAMPBELL, Respondent, v. JIMENES et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 25
Pages: 1143–1143

Head Matter:
CAMPBELL, Respondent, v. JIMENES et al., Appellants.
(City Court of New York, General Term.
October 20, 1893.)
Action by Bernard Campbell against Juan Y. Jimenes and others.
Tracy, Boardman & Platt, for appellants.
William F. Randel, for respondent.

Opinion:
NEWBURGER, J.
Our appellate court having held (Campbell v. Jimenes, 23 N. Y. Supp. 333) that the terms of the contract between plaintiff and defendants were ambiguous, and that the meaning of the instrument can only be determined by a jury, the trial justice therefore properly denied the defendants' motion to dismiss. There appears to be no other exception in the case of merit, and judgment must therefore be affirmed, with costs.