Case Name: Karl Adolph FRANTZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bruce CANTER, Dr.; et al., Defendants-Appellees, and Bievans, Sgt., Dr. Ranalfo Macabuay; et al., Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-04-19
Citations: 177 F. App'x 690
Docket Number: No. 06-15168
Parties: Karl Adolph FRANTZ, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Bruce CANTER, Dr.; et al., Defendants—Appellees, and Bievans, Sgt., Dr. Ranalfo Macabuay; et al., Defendant.
Judges: Before: HAWKINS, McKEOWN and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 177
Pages: 690–691

Head Matter:
Karl Adolph FRANTZ, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Bruce CANTER, Dr.; et al., Defendants—Appellees, and Bievans, Sgt., Dr. Ranalfo Macabuay; et al., Defendant.
No. 06-15168.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 5, 2006.
Filed April 19, 2006.
Karl Adolph Frantz, Buckeye, AZ, pro se.
Before: HAWKINS, McKEOWN and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Upon review of the record and appellant's opening brief, this court summarily affirms the district court's order denying appellant's motion for preliminary injunctive relief. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (summary affirmance appropriate where result is clear from face of record).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.