Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Marco Antonio SAENZ-MIRANDA, also known as Marco Antonio Miranda Saenz, also known as Marco Antonio Saens-Miranda, also known as Marco Miranda Saenz, also known as Marco Antonio Saenz, also known as Marco Sanez, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-05-24
Citations: 379 F. App'x 380
Docket Number: No. 09-20614
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Marco Antonio SAENZ-MIRANDA, also known as Marco Antonio Miranda Saenz, also known as Marco Antonio Saens-Miranda, also known as Marco Miranda Saenz, also known as Marco Antonio Saenz, also known as Marco Sanez, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 379
Pages: 380–380

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Marco Antonio SAENZ-MIRANDA, also known as Marco Antonio Miranda Saenz, also known as Marco Antonio Saens-Miranda, also known as Marco Miranda Saenz, also known as Marco Antonio Saenz, also known as Marco Sanez, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-20614
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
May 24, 2010.
James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Laura Fletcher Leavitt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Marco Antonio Saenz-Miranda has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Saenz-Miranda has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel's brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th CiR. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.