Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mario O. AJTUN-PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-10-02
Citations: 249 F. App'x 676
Docket Number: No. 06-50693
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mario O. AJTUN-PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 249
Pages: 676–676

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mario O. AJTUN-PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-50693.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 24, 2007 .
Filed Oct. 2, 2007.
Anna Lou Tirol, Esq., USSD — Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Lisa M. Bassis, Esq., Law Offices of Lisa Bassis, Los Angeles, CA, for Defen-danb-Appellant.
Before: CANBY, TASHIMA and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Mario O. Ajtun-Perez appeals from the 46-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to An-ders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Ajtun-Perez's counsel has filed a brief stating that she finds no meritorious issues for review, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our examination of the brief and our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no arguable issues for review on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.