Case Name: The State of Washington, on the Relation of McPherson Brothers Company, Plaintiff, v. The Superior Court for Okanogan County, Respondent
Court: Washington Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Washington
Decision Date: 1926-06-10
Citations: 139 Wash. 703
Docket Number: No. 19957
Parties: The State of Washington, on the Relation of McPherson Brothers Company, Plaintiff, v. The Superior Court for Okanogan County, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Washington Reports
Volume: 139
Pages: 703–703

Head Matter:
[No. 19957.
Department One.
June 10, 1926.]
The State of Washington, on the Relation of McPherson Brothers Company, Plaintiff, v. The Superior Court for Okanogan County, Respondent.
Peter McPherson, for relator.
Sam R. Sumner and Hartman & Hartman, for respondent.
Reported in 247 Pac. 4.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The facts in this case are similar to the facts stated in State ex rel McPherson Brothers Co. v. Superior Court, ante p. 294, 247 Pac. 3.
At the time action was brought to prohibit the Douglas county court from proceeding in the condemnation case, a like action was brought to prohibit the Okanogan county court. In one respect, however, they are different. At the time notification was given the trial court, in Okanogan county, of the issuance of the writ of prohibition, it' had not yet entered its order of condemnation and public necessity. Therefore, so much of that opinion as -deals with the question of the issuance of the writ of prohibition restraining an act already done, does not apply.
But that portion dealing with the failure of relator to in any wise apply to the superior court of Okanogan county to take any action upon the question of its jurisdiction applies with full force and effect.
Under the authority of that decision, the alternative writ is quashed and the peremptory writ denied.