Case Name: Charles M. CASSELL, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doctor JAGUST; Doctor Michalas, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-02-18
Citations: 311 F. App'x 664
Docket Number: No. 08-7602
Parties: Charles M. CASSELL, III, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Doctor JAGUST; Doctor Michalas, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 311
Pages: 664–665

Head Matter:
Charles M. CASSELL, III, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Doctor JAGUST; Doctor Michalas, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 08-7602.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 30, 2009.
Decided: Feb. 18, 2009.
Charles M. Cassell, III, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Pharr McCullough, Young, Moore & Henderson, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Charles M. Cassell, III, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cassell v. Jagust, No. 5:06-ct-03025-BO, 2008 WL 3068632 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 5, 2008). We deny the motions for appointment of counsel, to show cause and compel officials to supply materials, for injunctive relief, for reconsideration, and for access to this and other courts. The motion "in the forma pauperis" is denied as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.