Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Neil R. PUTERBAUGH, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-05-22
Citations: 688 F. App'x 801
Docket Number: No. 16-14904 Non-Argument Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Neil R. PUTERBAUGH, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before TJOFLAT, WILLIAM PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 688
Pages: 801–802

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Neil R. PUTERBAUGH, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-14904 Non-Argument Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
(May 22, 2017)
Wifredo A. Ferrer, Emily M, Smachetti, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, Rinku Talwar Tribuiani, U.S. Attorney’s Office, West Palm Beach, FL, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee
Before TJOFLAT, WILLIAM PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Richard Rosenbaum, appointed counsel for Neil Puterbaugh, Jr. in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Puter-baugh's conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.