Case Name: Ernest WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-11-29
Citations: 179 S.W.3d 306
Docket Number: No. ED 85674
Parties: Ernest WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 179
Pages: 306–306

Head Matter:
Ernest WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 85674.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Nov. 29, 2005.
Michelle M. Rivera, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jáy) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Evan'J. Buchhieim, Victor J. Melenbrink, Jefferson City, MÓ, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Ernest Williams (Williams) appeals the trial court's judgment, which denied his Rule '29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. The trial court properly found that Williams was not entitled to relief under Rule 29.15. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the Record on Appeal, and we find no error of law in this case. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(2).