Case Name: EQR-LPC URBAN RENEWAL NORTH PIER, LLC AND EQR-LINCOLN URBAN RENEWAL JERSEY CITY, LLC, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 2017-11-15
Citations: 231 N.J. 157
Docket Number: 078268
Parties: EQR-LPC URBAN RENEWAL NORTH PIER, LLC AND EQR-LINCOLN URBAN RENEWAL JERSEY CITY, LLC, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: CHIEF JUSTICE RABNER and JUSTICES LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, PATTERSON, FERNANDEZ-VINA, and SOLOMON join in this opinion. JUSTICE TIMPONE did not participate.
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 231
Pages: 157–157

Head Matter:
173 A.3d 184
EQR-LPC URBAN RENEWAL NORTH PIER, LLC AND EQR-LINCOLN URBAN RENEWAL JERSEY CITY, LLC, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
A-16 Sept.Term 2016
078268
Argued October 11, 2017
Decided November 15, 2017
Craig M. White (Baker & Hostetler of the Illinois bar, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for appellant (Baker & Hostetler and K & L Gates, attorneys; Craig M. White, Anthony P. La Rocco and Benjamin I. Rubinstein, on the brief).
Jeremy A. Farrell and Philip S. Adelman argued the cause for respondent (Jeremy A. Farrell, Corporation Counsel, City of New Jersey, attorney; Mary Ann Murphy, Assistant Corporation counsel, on the brief).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
The judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the PER CURIAM opinion, reported at 452 N.J. Super. 309, 173 A.3d 243 (App. Div. 2016).
CHIEF JUSTICE RABNER and JUSTICES LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, PATTERSON, FERNANDEZ-VINA, and SOLOMON join in this opinion. JUSTICE TIMPONE did not participate.