Case Name: MICHAEL ZAPARYNIUK ET AL. vs. JAMES M. COMCOWICH, ADMR. (Estate of Katherine Klimkowski) ET ALS.
Court: Connecticut Superior Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1941-09-30
Citations: 9 Conn. Supp. 523
Docket Number: File No. 60849
Parties: MICHAEL ZAPARYNIUK ET AL. vs. JAMES M. COMCOWICH, ADMR. (Estate of Katherine Klimkowski) ET ALS.
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Supplement
Volume: 9
Pages: 523–524

Head Matter:
MICHAEL ZAPARYNIUK ET AL. vs. JAMES M. COMCOWICH, ADMR. (Estate of Katherine Klimkowski) ET ALS.
Superior Court New Haven County
File No. 60849
MEMORANDUM FILED SEPTEMBER 30, 1941.
Lyman H. Steele, of New Haven, for the Plaintiffs.
Thomas R. Robinson, and Robert H. Alcorn, of New Haven, for the Defendants.

Opinion:
DICKENSON, J.
While paragraph one sufficiently alleges a consideration this does not bar the defendant from asking its particular nature. One of the expressed purposes of the statute (Gen. Stat. [1930] §5513) is to provide for "fuller and more particular statements."
The motion is granted.