Case Name: Milton I. Celestine et al., Respondents, v. City of New York et al., Defendants; New York City Transit Authority et al., Respondents, and Long Island Rail Road Company, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1983-06-28
Citations: 59 N.Y.2d 938
Docket Number: 
Parties: Milton I. Celestine et al., Respondents, v City of New York et al., Defendants; New York City Transit Authority et al., Respondents, and Long Island Rail Road Company, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 59
Pages: 938–940

Head Matter:
Milton I. Celestine et al., Respondents, v City of New York et al., Defendants; New York City Transit Authority et al., Respondents, and Long Island Rail Road Company, Appellant.
Argued May 31, 1983;
decided June 28, 1983
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Thomas M. Taranto and Edward G. Lukoski for appellant.
Cheryl R. Eisberg and Pamela Anagnos Liapakis for Milton I. Celestine and another, respondents.
Steve S. Efron, Richard K. Bernard and John A. Murray for New York City Transit Authority, respondent.
Robert L. Boydstun for Lima, Division of Clark Equipment Company, respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (86 AD2d 592).
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons.