Case Name: First National Bank of Pensacola, Plaintiff in Error, vs. Oxford Lake Line, Defendant in Error
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1903-01
Citations: 45 Fla. 275
Docket Number: 
Parties: First National Bank of Pensacola, Plaintiff in Error, vs. Oxford Lake Line, Defendant in Error.
Judges: 
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 45
Pages: 275–276

Head Matter:
First National Bank of Pensacola, Plaintiff in Error, vs. Oxford Lake Line, Defendant in Error.
APPELLATE PRACTICE — DEFECTIVELY CERTIFIED TRANSCRIPT OF RECORD CAUSE FOR DISMISSAL.
Where a cause is reached in its regular order for final disposition hy an appellate court, and it appears that the certificate to the transcript of record states only that it contains a correct recital of the papers and proceedings in the cause, without also stating that it contains correct copies of such papers and proceedings, the writ of error will he dismissed.
This case was decided by Division A. •
Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Escambia County. ...
•The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the Court .
Blount J- Blount, for Plaintiff in Error;
John O. Avery, for Defendant in Error.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The writ of error in this cause having been made returnable to the June term, 1900, of this court, and the cause having been reached in 'its regular order on the docket for final disposition and having been taken up for consideration by Division A of the court, and it ap pearing to the court that the clerk's certificate to the transcript certifies only that it contains a correct recital of the papers and proceedings in said cause without stating that it contains correct copies of such papers and proceedings, and that, therefore, no properly certified transcript of the record in said cause has ever been filed here, it is, therefore, hereby considered, ordered and adjudged that the writ of error in said cause be, and the same is hereby, dismissed, at the cost of the plaintiff in error. Burham v. Driggers, 44 Fla. 168., 32 South. Rep. 796.