Case Name: In re MURRAY
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1920-12-06
Citations: 269 F. 1020
Docket Number: No. 1332
Parties: In re MURRAY.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter
Volume: 269
Pages: 1020–1020

Head Matter:
In re MURRAY.
(Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.
Submitted; November 10, 1920.
Decided December 6, 1920.)
No. 1332.
Appeal from the Commissioner of Patents. Application by C. Edward Murray, Jr., for a patent for improvements in the construction of rubber tires. From a decision of the Commissioner of Patents, rejecting the application for lack of novelty, the applicant appeals.
Affirmed.
Alfred M. Houghton, of Washington, D. C. (D. Y. Mahoney, of Oakland, Cal., on the brief), for appellant.
T. A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. C., for Commissioner of Patents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant appeals from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents, denying him a patent for certain improvements in the construction of rubber tires. We agree with the unanimous opinions of the tribunals below in holding that nothing patentable is disclosed over the prior art. The decision of the Commissioner of Patents is affirmed, and the clerk is directed to certify these proceedings as by law required. Affirmed.