Case Name: Daniel H. OWSLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1996-06-04
Citations: 923 S.W.2d 502
Docket Number: No. WD 51886
Parties: Daniel H. OWSLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before LAURA DENVIR STITH, P.J., and ULRICH and SMART, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 923
Pages: 502–503

Head Matter:
Daniel H. OWSLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 51886.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
June 4, 1996.
Rebecca L. Kurz, Assistant Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Jill C. LaHue, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before LAURA DENVIR STITH, P.J., and ULRICH and SMART, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Daniel H. Owsley appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Mr. Owsley contends that he was induced to plead guilty because counsel misled him into believing that he would be sentenced to concurrent terms of ten years on each of two counts of first degree robbery and three years on each of two counts of armed criminal action. In fact, he was sentenced to fifteen years and five years on these counts, respectively, each sentence to be served concurrently with the other sentences then imposed.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error. Because a published opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential value, we affirm by this summary order under Rule 84.16(b), but have furnished the parties with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth our reasoning.