Case Name: Dorothy Peck, an Infant, by Samuel Peck, Her Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Frieda Saltzman, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1937-05-06
Citations: 163 Misc. 50
Docket Number: 
Parties: Dorothy Peck, an Infant, by Samuel Peck, Her Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Frieda Saltzman, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 163
Pages: 50–51

Head Matter:
Dorothy Peck, an Infant, by Samuel Peck, Her Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Frieda Saltzman, Appellant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
May 6, 1937.
Henry L. Ughetta [Everett W. Bovard of counsel], for the appellant.
Spencer & Zabelle [Michael Spencer of counsel], for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
A statement alleged to have been made to a police officer on the street shortly after an accident is not a statement in an " inquiry " as that term is used in section 343-a of the Civil Practice Act. The trial court was justified, therefore, in refusing to receive the police officer's testimony in behalf of defendant as to what defendant's chauffeur had said to him shortly after the accident, for the purpose of impeaching the chauffeur who, when called by defendant, had denied making the statements sought to be established.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
All concur. Present — Levy, Hammer and Callahan, JJ.