Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Louis WILLIAMS, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1997-10-14
Citations: 954 S.W.2d 15
Docket Number: No. 71166
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Louis WILLIAMS, Appellant.
Judges: Before CRANE, P.J., and RHODES RUSSELL and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 954
Pages: 15–15

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Louis WILLIAMS, Appellant.
No. 71166.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Oct. 14, 1997.
Douglas R. Hoff, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before CRANE, P.J., and RHODES RUSSELL and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Louis Williams, Defendant, appeals from his jury conviction for first degree robbery. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not plainly err in allowing certain arguments by the prosecuting attorney. Rule 29.12(b). An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. Rule 30.25(b). We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).