Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Anthony J. Derito, Appellant; The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Nicholas Derito, Appellant; The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Langley Bryant, Appellant; The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Anthony Guy Colunio, Appellant; The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Anthony Corsi, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1965-12-30
Citations: 17 N.Y.2d 473
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Anthony J. Derito, Appellant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Nicholas Derito, Appellant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Langley Bryant, Appellant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Anthony Guy Colunio, Appellant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Anthony Corsi, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 17
Pages: 473–474

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Anthony J. Derito, Appellant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Nicholas Derito, Appellant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Langley Bryant, Appellant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Anthony Guy Colunio, Appellant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Anthony Corsi, Appellant.
Argued November 30,1965;
decided December 30, 1965.
Irving S. Rinde for appellants.
Paul H. McCabe, District Attorney (Samuel J. Castellino of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
In each proceeding: Order reversed and proceeding remitted to the Recorder's 'Court of the City of Elmira to determine, after a hearing according to the procedure outlined in Hofferman v. Simmons (290 N. Y. 449), whether or to what extent the moneys involved were derived from gambling operations. No opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi and Bergan.