Case Name: Bullard-Lindsay Contracting Co., Inc., Appellant, v. Universal Bonding Insurance Company, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2003-03-27
Citations: 303 A.D.2d 317
Docket Number: 
Parties: Bullard-Lindsay Contracting Co., Inc., Appellant, v Universal Bonding Insurance Company, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 303
Pages: 317–317

Head Matter:
Bullard-Lindsay Contracting Co., Inc., Appellant, v Universal Bonding Insurance Company, Respondent.
[755 NYS2d 844]

Opinion:
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Schoenfeld, J.), entered on or about January 7, 2002, which, inter alia, granted defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff was not entitled to a refund of the portion of its bond premiums that corresponded to the contract value of the work remaining under its prematurely terminated construction contract. The risk attached at the inception of the coverage and the bond documents did not provide for a refund in the event of such termination. Under the circumstances, the premiums are deemed fully earned (see Sil-Turn Co. v London Guar. & Acc. Co., 153 Misc 805 [1934], affd 242 App Div 829 [1934]; Appeal of Bolden, 848 F2d 201, 209 [1988]; Fleetwood Acres v Federal Hous. Admin., 171 F2d 440, 442 [1948]). We have considered plaintiffs other contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Buckley, P.J., Nardelli, Andrias, Ellerin and Friedman, JJ.