Case Name: George L. GARRIDO, individually, and the Garrido Group Advertising, Inc., Appellants, v. BURGER KING CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, and Thomas Kupciunas, individually, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-10-20
Citations: 605 So. 2d 1026
Docket Number: No. 92-595
Parties: George L. GARRIDO, individually, and the Garrido Group Advertising, Inc., Appellants, v. BURGER KING CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, and Thomas Kupciunas, individually, Appellees.
Judges: Before JORGENSON, LEVY and GODERICH, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 605
Pages: 1026–1027

Head Matter:
George L. GARRIDO, individually, and the Garrido Group Advertising, Inc., Appellants, v. BURGER KING CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, and Thomas Kupciunas, individually, Appellees.
No. 92-595.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 20, 1992.
Bailey Hunt Jones & Busto and Mercedes C. Busto, Miami, and Scott L. Cagan, New York City, for appellants.
Angones, Hunter, McClure, Lynch & Williams and Francisco R. Angones, Miami, Breed, Abbot & Morgan and Stephen R. Lang and Brian L. Sullivan, New York City, for appellees.
Before JORGENSON, LEVY and GODERICH, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The record reflects the existence of a material question of fact relating to the "novelty" issue, and accordingly, the trial court was in error in granting the appel-lee's motion for summary judgment. See Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Metropolitan Dade County, 438 So.2d 978 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). As a result thereof, the summary judgment entered by the trial court must be reversed, with this cause thereafter proceeding to trial.
Reversed and remanded.