Case Name: BURGESS v. HILLMAN et al.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1912-12-03
Citations: 200 F. 932
Docket Number: No. 3,737
Parties: BURGESS v. HILLMAN et al.
Judges: Before SANBOKN and CARLAND, Circuit Judges, and W. H. MUNGER, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter
Volume: 200
Pages: 932–932

Head Matter:
BURGESS v. HILLMAN et al.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
December 3, 1912.)
No. 3,737.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Kansa s.
Action by T. J. Burgess against Amiel M. Hillman and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.
Affirmed.
Lee Monroe, of Topeka, Kan. (C. M. Monroe, of Topeka, Kan., on the brief), for appellant.
John E. Hessin, of Manhattan, Kan., for appellees.
Before SANBOKN and CARLAND, Circuit Judges, and W. H. MUNGER, District Judge.

Opinion:
CARLAND, Circuit Judge.
This case was submitted together with No. 3,728, 200 Fed. 929, and raises the same questions that were disposed of in that case. For the reason stated in the opinion filed therein, the decree in this case must be affirmed; and it is so ordered.