Case Name: The State ex rel. Temple, Appellee, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio et al.; AT&T Technologies, Inc., Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1998-10-14
Citations: 83 Ohio St. 3d 389
Docket Number: No. 97-1252
Parties: The State ex rel. Temple, Appellee, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio et al.; AT&T Technologies, Inc., Appellant.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 83
Pages: 389–389

Head Matter:
The State ex rel. Temple, Appellee, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio et al.; AT&T Technologies, Inc., Appellant.
[Cite as State ex rel. Temple v. Indus. Comm. (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 389.]
(No. 97-1252
Submitted August 19, 1998
Decided October 14, 1998.)
Law Offices of James R. Nein and Matthew R. Copp, for appellee Phyllis J. Temple.
Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur and Karl J. Sutter, for appellant.

Opinion:
The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.