Case Name: TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY AMUSEMENTS, INC., Plaintiff/Respondent, v. JOINT VENTURES, INC., d/b/a Allsport Amusement Co. and Robert Wilhelm, Defendants, and John P. Foley, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-10-27
Citations: 979 S.W.2d 507
Docket Number: No. 74003
Parties: TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY AMUSEMENTS, INC., Plaintiff/Respondent, v. JOINT VENTURES, INC., d/b/a Allsport Amusement Co. and Robert Wilhelm, Defendants, and John P. Foley, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before JAMES R. DOWD, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 979
Pages: 507–508

Head Matter:
TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY AMUSEMENTS, INC., Plaintiff/Respondent, v. JOINT VENTURES, INC., d/b/a Allsport Amusement Co. and Robert Wilhelm, Defendants, and John P. Foley, Defendant/Appellant.
No. 74003.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Oct. 27, 1998.
Frank W. Kriegel, Jr., St. Louis, for appellant.
Blumenfeld, Kaplan & Sandweiss, P.C., Evan D. Buxner, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before JAMES R. DOWD, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals the grant of plaintiffs motion for summary judgment in an action to enforce a written guaranty. The uncontro-verted facts set forth in plaintiffs motion support summary judgment. Defendant's response to summary judgment did not comply with the requirements set forth in Rule 74.04(e)(1) and therefore failed to preserve any dispute of material fact. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).