Case Name: Mrs. Bonnie C. FARR, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of William E. Farr, Deceased, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1972-12-18
Citations: 469 F.2d 1392
Docket Number: No. 72-2571
Parties: Mrs. Bonnie C. FARR, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of William E. Farr, Deceased, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 469
Pages: 1392–1392

Head Matter:
Mrs. Bonnie C. FARR, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of William E. Farr, Deceased, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 72-2571
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 18, 1972.
Charles C. Jacobs, Jr., Cleveland, Miss., for plaintiffs-appellants.
Alfred A. Levingston, Cleveland, Miss., for defendant-appellee.
Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and GOLDBERG and MORGAN, Circuit Judges.
Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part. I.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
This case presents a novel question under Mississippi law about the interpretation given certain clauses in a life insurance policy. The district court held on summary judgment for the defendant insurance company. We affirm.
After careful analysis of the facts and issues in this case, we find that a full opinion by this court could add little or nothing to the well-reasoned opinion rendered by the district court. See 351 F.Supp. 299 (N.D.Miss., 1972).
Affirmed.