Case Name: Joyce WANG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant, Samuel CHEUNG, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-04-09
Citations: 11 F. App'x 880
Docket Number: No. 00-15067; D.C. No. CV-98-01690-MHP
Parties: Joyce WANG, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant, Samuel CHEUNG, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before SNEED, FERNANDEZ, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 11
Pages: 880–881

Head Matter:
Joyce WANG, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant, Samuel CHEUNG, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 00-15067.
D.C. No. CV-98-01690-MHP.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 14, 2001 .
Decided April 9, 2001.
Before SNEED, FERNANDEZ, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
After de novo review, we affirm the judgment of the district court. There is no evidence in the record based on which a reasonable jury could conclude that the reasons offered by Samuel Cheung for ter minating Joyce Wang's employment were pretextual. The evidence is uncontradicted that Cheung terminated Wang on the basis of her inability to work appropriately with her colleagues.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
. See Weiner v. San Diego County, 210 F.3d 1025, 1028 (9th Cir.2000).
. See Nelson v. Pima Community College, 83 F.3d 1075, 1081 (9th Cir.1996); Wallis v. J.R. Simplot Co., 26 F.3d 885, 890 (9th Cir. 1994).