Case Name: Roger Anthony DANIELS, et al., Petitioners, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-05-04
Citations: 658 So. 2d 927
Docket Number: No. 83982
Parties: Roger Anthony DANIELS, et al., Petitioners, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, KOGAN, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 658
Pages: 927–928

Head Matter:
Roger Anthony DANIELS, et al., Petitioners, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 83982.
Supreme Court of Florida.
May 4, 1995.
Rehearing Denied July 5, 1995.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender and S.C. Van Voorhees, Asst. Public Defender, Dayto-na Beach, for petitioners.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Michael J. Neimand, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, and Parker D. Thomson and Carol A. Licko, Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen., Miami, for respondent.

Opinion:
SHAW, Justice.
We have for review State v. Daniels, 639 So.2d 624 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994), wherein the district court relied on Bouters v. State, 634 So.2d 246 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994), to reverse a trial court order finding Florida's stalking statute, § 784.048, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1992), unconstitutional. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.
We recently reviewed Bouters and found the statute constitutional. See Bouters v. State, No. 83,558, — So.2d - (Fla. Apr. 27, 1995). Accordingly, we approve the district court decision in Daniels.
It is so ordered.
GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, KOGAN, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.