Case Name: Beerman, Appellee, v. City of Kettering et al., Appellants
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1968-03-20
Citations: 13 Ohio St. 2d 149
Docket Number: No. 41032
Parties: Beerman, Appellee, v. City of Kettering et al., Appellants.
Judges: Taft, C. J., Zimmebmah, Matthias, Hebbebt, SchNeid-eb and BbowN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Second Series
Volume: 13
Pages: 149–150

Head Matter:
Beerman, Appellee, v. City of Kettering et al., Appellants.
(No. 41032
Decided March 20, 1968.)
Messrs. Goldman, Cole & Putmck and Mr. Jerome Goldman, for appellee.
Mr. John L. Adams, law director, Messrs. Vorys, Safer, Seymour & Pease and Mr. Arthur 1. Vorys, for appellants.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This court finds itself in the same predicament as did the Court of Appeals. There is no bill of exceptions and no findings of fact and conclusions of law by the trial court.
In entertaining the appeal we were not fully aware of the situation as it has developed. For the reason stated, we cannot reach the merits of the controversy, and we' are constrained to affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals.
Judgment affirmed.
Taft, C. J., Zimmebmah, Matthias, Hebbebt, SchNeid-eb and BbowN, JJ., concur.
Tboop, J., dissents.
Tboob, J., of the Tenth Appellate District, sitting, for O'Nehx, J.