Case Name: Herman BAIN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-06-14
Citations: 655 So. 2d 1321
Docket Number: No. 94-2176
Parties: Herman BAIN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and GERSTEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 655
Pages: 1321–1321

Head Matter:
Herman BAIN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 94-2176.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
June 14, 1995.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Robert Friedman, Special Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Richard L. Polin, Asst. Atty. Gen. and Jack Reise, Certified Legal Intern, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and GERSTEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The only issue on this appeal from a manslaughter conviction claims error in the amount the defendant was ordered to pay in restitution for the victim's funeral expenses. Although he claims that the trial judge erroneously failed to consider his alleged lack of financial resources as required under section 775.089(6), Fla.Stat. (1993), the record shows that the issue was not appropriately asserted below because Bain neither properly objected to the ruling nor provided actual evidence of his inability to pay. See Anderson v. State, 649 So.2d 890 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Moore v. State, 623 So.2d 842 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Brooks v. State, 605 So.2d 522 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Oropesa v. State, 555 So.2d 389 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), review denied, 562 So.2d 346 (Fla.1990).
Affirmed.
. The 1995 legislature has amended § 775.089(6) to provide that the defendant's ability to pay is to be considered only when there is an attempt to enforce the restitution order. 1995 Fla.Sess.Law Serv. Ch. 95-160 (H.B. 239) (West),