Case Name: Robert H. Armstrong, respondent, v. Bertha Louise Armstrong, appellant
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1928-02-06
Citations: 102 N.J. Eq. 330
Docket Number: 
Parties: Robert H. Armstrong, respondent, v. Bertha Louise Armstrong, appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 102
Pages: 330–330

Head Matter:
Robert H. Armstrong, respondent, v. Bertha Louise Armstrong, appellant.
[Decided February 6th, 1928.]
Mr. Edmund A. Hayes, for the respondent.
Mr. Winfield 8. Angleman, for the appellant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Ingersoll, and reported in 99 N. J. Eq. 19.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Jus,tice, Trenchaed, Parker, Minturn, EIalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Camebell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.