Case Name: Freddie J. KELLY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUNTRUST BANK; Equifax Information Services, LLC; Experian; Transunion, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-12-02
Citations: 671 F. App'x 117
Docket Number: No. 16-1310
Parties: Freddie J. KELLY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUNTRUST BANK; Equifax Information Services, LLC; Experian; Transunion, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before KING, SHEDD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 671
Pages: 117–117

Head Matter:
Freddie J. KELLY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUNTRUST BANK; Equifax Information Services, LLC; Experian; Transunion, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-1310
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: October 31, 2016
Decided: December 2, 2016
Freddie J. Kelly, Appellant Pro Se. Terry Catherine Frank, Kaufman & Cañóles, PC, Richmond, Virginia; John Willard Montgomery, Jr., Montgomery & Simpson, LLP, Richmond, Virginia; Jennifer Loraine Swize, Jones Day, Washington, D.C.; Paul L. Myers, Strasburger <& Price, LLP, Frisco, Texas; Michael R. Ward, Morris & Morris, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before KING, SHEDD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Freddie J. Kelly appeals the district court's order granting Defendants' motions for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kelly v. Sun-Trust Bank, No. 3:14-cv-00121-JAG, 2016 WL 775781 (E.D. Va. Feb. 25, 2016). Wé dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED