Case Name: COURTER OIL CO. v. OKLAHOMA CITY
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1934-04-03
Citations: 167 Okla. 633
Docket Number: No. 22275
Parties: COURTER OIL CO. v. OKLAHOMA CITY.
Judges: CULLISON., V- C. J., and SWINDALL, ANDREWS, OSBORN, and BUSBY, JJ„ concur. RILEY, C. J., and BAYLESS and WELCH, JJ., absent.
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 167
Pages: 633–634

Head Matter:
COURTER OIL CO. v. OKLAHOMA CITY.
No. 22275.
April 3, 1934.
Everest, McKenzie, Halley & Gibbens, for plaintiff in error.
A. L. McRill, Municipal Counselor, and H.T- Deupree, Asst. Mun. Counselor, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
McNEILL, J.
This appeal involves the failure of the Courter Oil Company, plaintiff in error, to post a bond in the supi of $200,000, as required by Ordinance 3944 of the city of Oklahoma City in reference to drilling of an oil and gas well within the TJ-7 drilling zone of said city.
We consider it unnecessary to discuss this question. This same question has received our consideration. See Gant v. Oklahoma City, 150 Okla. 86, 6 P. (2d) 1065; Gant v. Oklahoma City, 160 Okla. 62, 15 P. (2d) 833, which was affirmed by the Supreme Court of the United States, 289 U. S. 99, 77 L. Ed. 1058, 53 S. Ct. 530; C. C. Julian Oil & Royalties Co. v. Oklahoma City, 167 Okla. 384, 29 P. (2d) 952, and Hud Oil & Refining Co. v. Oklahoma City, 167 Okla. 457, 30 P. (2d) 169; and Morgan Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma City, 167 Okla. 632, 31 P. (2d) 594.
Judgment affirmed.
CULLISON., V- C. J., and SWINDALL, ANDREWS, OSBORN, and BUSBY, JJ" concur. RILEY, C. J., and BAYLESS and WELCH, JJ., absent.