Case Name: Tenaglia v. Tenaglia, Appellant
Court: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1936-12-10
Citations: 124 Pa. Super. 124
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 83
Parties: Tenaglia v. Tenaglia, Appellant.
Judges: Before Keller, P. J., Cunningham, Baldrige, Stadtfeld, Parker, James and Rhodes, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania Superior Court Reports
Volume: 124
Pages: 124–125

Head Matter:
Tenaglia v. Tenaglia, Appellant.
Argued November 17, 1936.
Before Keller, P. J., Cunningham, Baldrige, Stadtfeld, Parker, James and Rhodes, JJ.
John J. Oahill, for appellant.
Harry S. Abrams, for appellee.
December 10, 1936:

Opinion:
Per Curiam,
Upon a review of the evidence in this case we are in general accord with the conclusions of the Master and the Court below. Since the argument the appellant has died. We shall decide the case—see Upperman v. Upperman, 119 Pa. Superior Ct. 341—but no good purpose would be served by a review of the evidence.
The decree is affirmed.