Case Name: STATE of Maine v. Raymond TINGLEY
Court: Maine Supreme Judicial Court
Jurisdiction: Maine
Decision Date: 1983-10-05
Citations: 466 A.2d 27
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE of Maine v. Raymond TINGLEY.
Judges: Before McKUSICK, C.J., and NICHOLS, ROBERTS, VIOLETTE, WATHEN, GLASSMAN and SCOLNIK, JJ.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 466
Pages: 27–27

Head Matter:
STATE of Maine v. Raymond TINGLEY.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.
Argued Sept. 21, 1983.
Decided Oct. 5, 1983.
Charles K. Leadbetter, Asst. Atty. Gen. (orally), Augusta, David W. Crook, Dist. Atty., John Alsop, Asst. Dist. Atty., Bangor, for plaintiff.
Levine, Bishop & Levine, Ronald L. Bishop (orally), Waterville, for defendant.
Before McKUSICK, C.J., and NICHOLS, ROBERTS, VIOLETTE, WATHEN, GLASSMAN and SCOLNIK, JJ.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
After a bench trial, the Superior Court (Somerset County) convicted defendant Raymond Tingley of vehicular manslaughter, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 203 (1983). Defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction and argues that the Superior Court erred in denying his motion to suppress the results of a blood alcohol test. We deny the appeal.
The facts found by the suppression justice provide ample support for the denial of the motion to suppress and those findings will be set aside only if clearly erroneous. State v. MacKenzie, 161 Me. 123, 134, 210 A.2d 24, 31 (1965). Defendant fails to demonstrate error.
The remaining evidentiary issues raised by the defendant on appeal are lacking in merit and require no discussion.
The entry is:
Judgment of conviction affirmed.
All concurring.