Case Name: MICHAEL DEVINCENTIS v. VALERIE DEVINCENTIS
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1995-12-05
Citations: 39 Conn. App. 931
Docket Number: 13609
Parties: MICHAEL DEVINCENTIS v. VALERIE DEVINCENTIS
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Appellate Reports
Volume: 39
Pages: 931–931

Head Matter:
MICHAEL DEVINCENTIS v. VALERIE DEVINCENTIS
(13609)
Foti, Lavery and Landau, Js.
Argued October 31
decision released December 5, 1995
James V. Somers, with whom, on the brief, were Suzanne L. McAlpine, and John J. Keefe, Jr., for the appellant (plaintiff).
James B. Streeto, for the appellee (defendant).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The plaintiff appeals from a judgment of dissolution. This appeal can best be categorized as a valiant but futile effort to retry the case in this court. No novel principles of law or appellate procedures are involved and to discuss the defendant's claim would serve no good purpose. See Byrne v. Trice, 170 Conn. 442, 442-43, 365 A.2d 1063 (1976).
The judgment is affirmed.