Case Name: Starsha M. SEWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-12-06
Citations: 705 F. App'x 191
Docket Number: No. 17-1632
Parties: Starsha M. SEWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 705
Pages: 191–191

Head Matter:
Starsha M. SEWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 17-1632
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: November 27, 2017
Decided: December 6, 2017
Starsha Sewell, Appellant Pro Se.
Michael Kelly Guss, WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Washington, D.C., for Appel-lee.
Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Starsha M. Sewell appeals the district court's orders dismissing this action alleging discrimination in employment and a conspiracy concerning child custody and denying her motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Washington Metro. Area Transit Auth., No. 8:16-cv-02456-GJH (D. Md. July 19 & Aug. 29, 2016; Mar. 13 & May 1, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED