Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. William V. BARTLETT, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1934-10-26
Citations: 73 F.2d 1015
Docket Number: No. 7408
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. William V. BARTLETT, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 73
Pages: 1015–1015

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. William V. BARTLETT, Appellee.
No. 7408.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Oct. 26, 1934.
Peirson M. Hall, TJ. S. Atty., Mansel G. Gallahcr, Asst. U. S. Atty., and Ernest D. Fooks, Atty. Dept, of Justice, all of Los Angeles, Cal., and Will G. Beardslee, Director, Bureau of War Risk Litigation, of Washington, D. C., Randolph C. Shaw, Sp. Asst, to Atty. Gen., Thomas E. Walsh, Sp. Asst, to Atty. Gen., and Armistead L. Boothe, Atty. Dept, of Justice, of Washington, D. C.
Wm. II. Wilson and Wm. Christensen, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Before WILBUR and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The record in this ease does not present the question of the sufficiency of the evidence to justify the judgment. Continental Nat. Bank et al. v. National City Bank of New York (C. C. A.) 69 F.(2d) 312. This being the only assignment of error presented by the appellant, the judgment is affirmed.