Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Carole A. CHALK, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2011-03-15
Citations: 333 S.W.3d 534
Docket Number: No. ED 94487
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Carole A. CHALK, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J. and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 333
Pages: 534–534

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Carole A. CHALK, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 94487.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
March 15, 2011.
Andrew E. Zleit; Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, James B. Farnsworth, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J. and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Carole A. Chalk (Defendant) appeals from the judgment upon her conviction by a jury for the class C felony of abuse of a child, in violation of Section 568.060, RSMo Cum.Supp.2007, and for which Defendant was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to ten years' imprisonment. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find Defendant is entitled to no relief on appeal. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the trial court's judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
. All statutory references are to RSMo Cum. Supp.2007 unless otherwise noted.