Case Name: F. J. L., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1976-02-17
Citations: 327 So. 2d 904
Docket Number: No. 75-679
Parties: F. J. L., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, C. J., and HEN-DRY and NATHAN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 327
Pages: 904–905

Head Matter:
F. J. L., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 75-679.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 17, 1976.
Rehearing Denied March 23, 1976.
Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and Gerald D. Hubbart, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Arthur Joel Berger, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Mitchell Luber, Legal Intern, for appellee.
Before BARKDULL, C. J., and HEN-DRY and NATHAN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
A petition for delinquency was filed in the Circuit Court of Dade County, Juvenile —Family Division, charging the defendant with two counts of robbery and one count of unlawful use of a firearm in the commission of a felony. The state filed a motion for order waiving jurisdiction. It was admitted that there was probable cause to believe that the defendant committed the crimes charged in the petition. A hearing was held on the waiver motion which re-suited in an order by the court granting the motion.
The defendant has appealed the order of waiver and argues that the court committed reversible error in ruling that it was in the best interest of the public to waive jurisdiction over the defendant as a juvenile on the grounds that there were no rehabilitative programs available in the juvenile justice system suitable for the defendant when the testimony demonstrated that such programs were available.
The court made its findings and order of waiver after a full hearing. Our review of the record leads us to the conclusion that the court's ruling is fully supported by substantial competent evidence and arrived at in accordance with the requirements of Florida Statute 39.09(2)(d), Rule 8.110 Rules of Juvenile Procedure and the guidelines set forth in Davis v. State, Fla.1974, 297 So.2d 289.
No reversible error having been demonstrated, the order appealed is affirmed.
Affirmed.