Case Name: The People of the State of New York ex rel. 270 Park Avenue Corporation and Vanderbilt Avenue Realty Corporation, Respondents, Appellants, and The New York & Harlem Railroad Company and The New York Central Railroad Company, Intervening Relators, Respondents, Appellants, v. James J. Sexton and Others, and William Stanley Miller and Others, as Commissioners of Taxes and Assessments of the City of New York, Appellants, Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1942-07-03
Citations: 264 A.D. 911
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York ex rel. 270 Park Avenue Corporation and Vanderbilt Avenue Realty Corporation, Respondents, Appellants, and The New York & Harlem Railroad Company and The New York Central Railroad Company, Intervening Relators, Respondents, Appellants, v. James J. Sexton and Others, and William Stanley Miller and Others, as Commissioners of Taxes and Assessments of the City of New York, Appellants, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 264
Pages: 911–912

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York ex rel. 270 Park Avenue Corporation and Vanderbilt Avenue Realty Corporation, Respondents, Appellants, and The New York & Harlem Railroad Company and The New York Central Railroad Company, Intervening Relators, Respondents, Appellants, v. James J. Sexton and Others, and William Stanley Miller and Others, as Commissioners of Taxes and Assessments of the City of New York, Appellants, Respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The opinions of both the referee and the justice at Special Term indicate that due regard was given to the factors of subsurface use and improvements. Assuming that some of the experts on both sides had erroneous theories or concepts of value on these subjects, this would not constitute a failure of proof or require a dismissal of the writ, where there was other and sufficient evidence in the record to show the amounts which the factors mentioned added to the taxable value. We find ample evidence in the record to warrant the findings made. It does not appear that Special Term adopted a wrong theory of valuation.
The order, so far as appealed from, should be affirmed, without costs.
Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, without costs.