Case Name: ARGO SYSTEMS FZE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LIBERTY INSURANCE PTE. LTD., Marine Insurance Services PTE. LTD., DeWitt Stern Group, Inc., DeWitt Stern, Imperatore, Ltd., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-05-23
Citations: 278 F. App'x 972
Docket Number: No. 07-15058
Parties: ARGO SYSTEMS FZE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LIBERTY INSURANCE PTE. LTD., Marine Insurance Services PTE. LTD., DeWitt Stern Group, Inc., DeWitt Stern, Imperatore, Ltd., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before DUBINA and BARRETT, Circuit Judges, and SCHLESINGER, District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 278
Pages: 972–973

Head Matter:
ARGO SYSTEMS FZE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LIBERTY INSURANCE PTE. LTD., Marine Insurance Services PTE. LTD., DeWitt Stern Group, Inc., DeWitt Stern, Imperatore, Ltd., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 07-15058.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
May 23, 2008.
Thomas S. Rue, Johnstone, Adams, Bailey, Gordon & Harris, L.L.C., Mobile, AL, Michael C. Bynane, Bynane & Co., PC, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Jon W. Wise, E. Stuart Ponder, New Orleans, LA, Robert Michael Sullivan, Sullivan & Manarel, LLP, New York, NY, Norman M. Stockman, Blane Horton Crutchfield, Hand, Arendall, LLC, Mobile, AL, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before DUBINA and BARRETT, Circuit Judges, and SCHLESINGER, District Judge.
Honorable Harvey E. Schlesinger, United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appellant Argo Systems FZE ("Argo") appeals the district court's order granting Appellees Liberty Insurance PTE. Ltd. ("Liberty") and Marine Insurance Services PTE. Ltd.'s ("MIS") motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and the district court's judgment entered in favor of Appellee DeWitt Stern, Imperatore, Ltd. ("DeWitt" or "DSI") on Argo's professional negligence and negligent misrepresentation claims.
After reviewing the record, reading the parties' briefs, and having the benefit of oral argument, we conclude that there is no merit to any of the arguments Argo makes in this appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order granting Liberty and MIS's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Moreover, we affirm the district court's judgment entered in favor of DeWitt after a bench trial on Argo's professional negligence and negligent misrepresentation claims.
AFFIRMED.