Case Name: Victor L. PADILLA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Roy O. PRIEST; Others, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-10-23
Citations: 543 F. App'x 353
Docket Number: No. 13-1830
Parties: Victor L. PADILLA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Roy O. PRIEST; Others, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 543
Pages: 353–354

Head Matter:
Victor L. PADILLA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Roy O. PRIEST; Others, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 13-1830.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 21, 2013.
Decided: Oct. 23, 2013.
Victor L. Padilla, Appellant pro se. Michael Jay Weiser, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Victor L. Padilla appeals the district court's order dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Padilla v. Priest, No. 1:13-cv-00287-CMH-IDD (E.D. Va. filed June 25, 2013, and entered June 26, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.