Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jorge Berrios, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1988-04-21
Citations: 71 N.Y.2d 905
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jorge Berrios, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 71
Pages: 905–906

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jorge Berrios, Appellant.
Argued March 18, 1988;
decided April 21, 1988
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
John J. Halloran, Jr., for appellant.
Paul Gentile, District Attorney (Andrea M. DiGregorio and Peter D. Coddington of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed. Defendant's primary argument on this appeal, that evidence of a prior assault on the victim was not admissible to negate the anticipated defense of accident, was not raised in the trial court and therefore is not preserved for our review. Defendant's remaining contentions, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence, are without merit.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.