Case Name: Reginald JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-09-15
Citations: 976 S.W.2d 604
Docket Number: No. 72834
Parties: Reginald JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., C.J., and CRANDALL and KAROHL, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 976
Pages: 604–605

Head Matter:
Reginald JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 72834.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Sept. 15, 1998.
Dave Hemingway, Asst. Sp. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Gregory L. Barnes, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., C.J., and CRANDALL and KAROHL, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant appeals denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post conviction relief from sentencing in response to a guilty plea to a reduced charge of robbery second degree. The motion court found that the grounds alleged were refuted by the record. The court informed defendant before sentencing that the state would dismiss the charge of armed criminal action and reduce a robbery first degree to robbery second degree in exchange for a thirteen-year sentence. Defendant accepted the plea agreement. He had adequate time to confer with his counsel, had the advice of his counsel, and was satisfied with his counsel. He alleged in his motion that his counsel failed to file a motion to suppress which prevented a ruling on a denial of rights and in his motion deprived him of information necessary to support a decision to plead guilty. The plea record conclusively refutes the allegation.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b)