Case Name: Fred PEACOCK et al., Petitioners, v. John C. NIMS et al., Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1968-02-21
Citations: 207 So. 2d 277
Docket Number: No. 36969
Parties: Fred PEACOCK et al., Petitioners, v. John C. NIMS et al., Respondents.
Judges: ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 207
Pages: 277–277

Head Matter:
Fred PEACOCK et al., Petitioners, v. John C. NIMS et al., Respondents.
No. 36969.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Feb. 21, 1968.
William W. Henderson, Jr., of Fisher & Hepner, Pensacola, for petitioners.
Jack S. Graff, of Levin, Askew, War-field, Levin & Graff, Pensacola, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date October 26, 1967.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition for certiorari is therefore denied.
It is so ordered.
ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.