Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, Carlos Humberto Orantes-Arriaga, Claimant - Appellant, v. $77,825.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY, in rem, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-07-21
Citations: 189 F. App'x 675
Docket Number: No. 06-35184
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, Carlos Humberto Orantes-Arriaga, Claimant — Appellant, v. $77,825.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY, in rem, Defendant.
Judges: Before: B. FLETCHER, HAWKINS and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 189
Pages: 675–676

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, Carlos Humberto Orantes-Arriaga, Claimant — Appellant, v. $77,825.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY, in rem, Defendant.
No. 06-35184.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 17, 2006.
Filed July 21, 2006.
Leslie Jo Westphal, Scott E. Asphaug, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Portland, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Carlos Humberto Orantes-Amaga, Terre Haute, IN, pro se.
Before: B. FLETCHER, HAWKINS and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
A review of the record, the opening brief and response to the court's May 30, 3006 order indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United, States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.
All pending motions are denied as moot.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.