Case Name: Peter D. BOGART, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Harlon B. CARTER, as Regional Commissioner of the Immigration & Naturalization Service, etc., et al., Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1971-08-03
Citations: 445 F.2d 321
Docket Number: No. 25140
Parties: Peter D. BOGART, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Harlon B. CARTER, as Regional Commissioner of the Immigration & Naturalization Service, etc., et al., Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 445
Pages: 321–322

Head Matter:
Peter D. BOGART, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Harlon B. CARTER, as Regional Commissioner of the Immigration & Naturalization Service, etc., et al., Appellees.
No. 25140.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Aug. 3, 1971.
Phill Silver, Hollywood, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.
Robert L. Meyer, U. S. Atty., Frederick M. Brosio, Jr., Chief, Crim. Div., Carolyn M. Reynolds, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees.
Before CHAMBERS and HUFSTED-LER, Circuit Judges, and BEEKS, District Judge.

Opinion:
The summary judgment rendered against plaintiff-appellant is reversed. We think this is indicated by In re Ruf-falo (1968), 390 U.S. 544, 88 S.Ct. 1222, 20 L.Ed.2d 117, and Theard v. United States (1957), 354 U.S. 278, 77 S.Ct. 1274, 1 L.Ed.2d 1342. We believe Bogart has a constitutional right to a hearing before the agency before being denied the right to further practice before the agency, department regulations to the contrary notwithstanding.