Case Name: CUSTER et al. v. FORTUNA OIL CO.
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1919-10-28
Citations: 77 Okla. 257
Docket Number: Nos. 9055 and 10096
Parties: CUSTER et al. v. FORTUNA OIL CO.
Judges: OWEN, O. J., KANE, PITOHFORD, JOHNSON, HIGGINS, and BAILEY, J.T., concur; MeNEILL, J., dissents; HARRISON, J., absent.
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 77
Pages: 257–257

Head Matter:
CUSTER et al. v. FORTUNA OIL CO.
Nos. 9055 and 10096
Opinion Filed Oct. 28, 1919.
Rehearing Denied March 9, 1920.

Opinion:
RAINEY, J.
The facts in this ease are substantially the same as in the case of Charles M. Prowant et al. v. John Sealy et al., Trustees for Magnolia Petroleum Company, this day decided and the legal propositions involved are identical. The opinion in the' last named case, therefore, governs this ease and requires an affirmance of the judgment of the trial court.
It is so ordered.
OWEN, O. J., KANE, PITOHFORD, JOHNSON, HIGGINS, and BAILEY, J.T., concur; MeNEILL, J., dissents; HARRISON, J., absent.