Case Name: Latoya CARTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2015-04-14
Citations: 463 S.W.3d 810
Docket Number: ED 100855
Parties: Latoya CARTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before: Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 463
Pages: 810–811

Head Matter:
Latoya CARTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
ED 100855
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Filed: April 14, 2015
Application for Transfer Denied June 30, 2015
Srikant Chigurupati, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Todd T. Smith, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.
Before: Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Latoya Carter appeals from the motion court's judgment denying her Rule 24.035 motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court's denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b).
. All rule references aré to Mo.R. Crim.P. 2014, unless otherwise indicated.