Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Corey Lemar WRIGHT, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-11-10
Citations: 670 F. App'x 683
Docket Number: No. 16-11615
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Corey Lemar WRIGHT, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before HULL, WILSON and WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 670
Pages: 683–683

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Corey Lemar WRIGHT, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-11615
Non-Argument Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Date Filed: 11/10/2016
Sivashree Sundaram, Miesha Shonta Darrough, Wifredo A. Ferrer, Jamie Gal-vin, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Daren Grove, Andrea G. Hoffman, Emily M. Smachetti, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Corey Lemar Wright, Pro Se
Before HULL, WILSON and WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Corey Lemar Wright appeals pro se the denial of his third motion to reduce his sentence. 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Wright moved for a reduction based on Amendment 782 of the Sentencing Guidelines. We affirm.
The district court did not err by denying Wright's motion. Wright pleaded guilty to possessing with intent to distribute cocaine base, see 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (a)(2), and the district court sentenced him to five years of imprisonment. Because Wright's sentence was based on the statutory mandatory minimum, see United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5G1.1(b), not on the drug quantity tables, see id. § 2D1.1, he was ineligible for a reduction of Jiis sentence under Amendment 782, see id. § 1B1.10 cmt n.1(A). The district court lacked authority to reduce Wright's sentence.
We AFFIRM the denial of Wright's motion to reduce.