Case Name: David MATTSON, Respondent, v. CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant
Court: Minnesota Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Minnesota
Decision Date: 1984-06-19
Citations: 349 N.W.2d 605
Docket Number: No. C2-84-512
Parties: David MATTSON, Respondent, v. CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.
Judges: Considered and decided by WOZNIAK, P.J., HUSPENI and NIERENGARTEN, JJ., with oral argument waived.
Reporter: North Western Reporter 2d
Volume: 349
Pages: 605–606

Head Matter:
David MATTSON, Respondent, v. CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.
No. C2-84-512.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
June 19, 1984.
Michael S. Kreidler, Minneapolis, for appellant.
Jeffrey R. Anderson, St. Paul, for respondent.
Considered and decided by WOZNIAK, P.J., HUSPENI and NIERENGARTEN, JJ., with oral argument waived.

Opinion:
OPINION
WOZNIAK, Judge.
Continental Insurance Company argues that, since the legislature has repealed the underinsured motorist coverage section of the No-Fault Act, they are free to exclude stacking of benefits. In Sobania v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Co., 349 N.W.2d 345 (Minn.Ct.App.1984), this court held that the repeal did not change the nature of underinsured motorist coverage and, therefore, attempted "anti-stacking" exclusions, such as the one in this case, are void.
DECISION
Affirmed.