Case Name: [The State ex rel.] Taylor, Appellant, v. Leffler, Pros. Atty., et al., Appellees
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2000-03-08
Citations: 88 Ohio St. 3d 178
Docket Number: No. 99-1733
Parties: [The State ex rel.] Taylor, Appellant, v. Leffler, Pros. Atty., et al., Appellees.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 88
Pages: 178–179

Head Matter:
[The State ex rel.] Taylor, Appellant, v. Leffler, Pros. Atty., et al., Appellees.
[Cite as State ex rel. Taylor v. Leffler (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 178.]
(No. 99-1733
Submitted January 11, 2000
Decided March 8, 2000.)
Larry Taylor, pro se.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals for the reasons stated in its opinion. A writ of mandamus will not issue to compel an act already performed. State ex rel. Sharif v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 375, 376, 708 N.E.2d 718, 719. And appellees had no duty to create documents to meet Taylor's requests. State ex rel. Warren v. Warner (1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 432, 433, 704 N.E.2d 1228, 1229.
Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.