Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Artemio SALGADO-CASTILLO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-06-25
Citations: 12 F. App'x 578
Docket Number: No. 00-50254; D.C. No. CR-99-00117-GLT
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Artemio SALGADO-CASTILLO, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 12
Pages: 578–579

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Artemio SALGADO-CASTILLO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 00-50254.
D.C. No. CR-99-00117-GLT.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 11, 2001.
Decided June 25, 2001.
Before O’SCANNLAIN, SILVERMAN, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Artemio Salgado-Castillo appeals the 57-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to being an alien found in the United States following deportation. Sal-gado-Castillo contends that in light of Ap-prendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), the district court erred in imposing a sentence in excess of the two-year maximum set forth in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) based upon a prior felony to which he did not admit, and which was not submitted to a jury and proven beyond a reasonable doubt. He also contends that Apprendi renders inapplicable Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998) (holding that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a sentencing factor and not a separate offense), because he did not admit to an aggravated felony. His arguments are foreclosed by this court's recent decision in United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir.2000), as amended (Feb. 8, 2001). United States v. Castillo Rivera, 244 F.3d 1020, 1024-45 (9th Cir.2001).
AFFIRMED.
. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.