Case Name: Elizabeth Eichert, Exrx. v. Elizabeth Eichert, Widow, et al.
Court: Hamilton Circuit Court
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1905-01-21
Citations: 20 Ohio C.C. Dec. 810
Docket Number: 
Parties: Elizabeth Eichert, Exrx. v. Elizabeth Eichert, Widow, et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Ohio Circuit Court Decisions
Volume: 20
Pages: 810–810

Head Matter:
APPEAL.
[Hamilton (1st) Circuit Court,
January 21, 1905.]
Giffen, Jelke and Swing, JJ.
Elizabeth Eichert, Exrx. v. Elizabeth Eichert, Widow, et al.
1. OBDEB BOB DISTRIBUTION OP FUND IN RECEIVERS.
An order for distribution of a fund in an equity case is a final order in which parties affected nave no right to a trial by jury and is appealable.
.2. Notice oe Appeal Appended to Order bob Distribution, Sufficient.
A notice of appeal, appended to an order for distribution by a receiver, is properly given.
MotioN to dismiss appeal.
Tafel & Schott and Frederick Hertenstein, for the motion.
F. S. Starkey and J. <3. Hudson, contra.
For other decisions relating to this receivership, see post, 825; Eichert v. Eichert, 28 O. C. C. 795 (8 N. S. 526).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The order appealed from related to the distribution of the fund in n,n equity case, and was a final order in a civil action in which the parties affected thereby had not the right to demand a trial by a jury. Spence v. Basey, 34 Ohio St. 42.
The original action was commenced June 26, 1897; the order complained of was made March 31, 1904, to which was appended notice o£ appeal. The notice was therefore properly given in the mode prescribed by the statute in force at the commencement of the original action. Charles v. Fawley, 71 Ohio St. 50 [72 N. E. Rep. 294].
Motion to dismiss appeal overruled.