Case Name: SEGOVIA INVESTMENTS, INC., etc., Appellant, v. Spyros KATOGAS et al., Appellees; SEGOVIA INVESTMENTS, INC., etc., Appellant, v. EMERALD PLAZA WEST, INC., et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1978-11-28
Citations: 364 So. 2d 838
Docket Number: Nos. 77-2680, 78-558
Parties: SEGOVIA INVESTMENTS, INC., etc., Appellant, v. Spyros KATOGAS et al., Appellees. SEGOVIA INVESTMENTS, INC., etc., Appellant, v. EMERALD PLAZA WEST, INC., et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before PEARSON, HENDRY and BARKDULL, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 364
Pages: 838–838

Head Matter:
SEGOVIA INVESTMENTS, INC., etc., Appellant, v. Spyros KATOGAS et al., Appellees. SEGOVIA INVESTMENTS, INC., etc., Appellant, v. EMERALD PLAZA WEST, INC., et al., Appellees.
Nos. 77-2680, 78-558.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 28, 1978.
Sidney B. Shapiro, Coral Gables, for appellant.
Pertnoy & Greenberg and Leonard D. Pertnoy, Miami, for appellees.
Before PEARSON, HENDRY and BARKDULL, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
These appeals by the plaintiff are from the dismissal of a complaint and the dismissal of a counterclaim and third party complaint in a separate suit. The plaintiff concedes that if the complaint, which is the subject of the first appeal, was properly dismissed, the dismissal of the counterclaim and the third party complaint in the subsequent suit was proper.
The plaintiff claimed an interest in real property but was unable to produce a writing to support said claimed interest. The dismissal of the complaint was proper under Section 689.01, Florida Statutes (1977). See Anderson v. Tower Amusement Co., 120 Fla. 476, 163 So. 11 (1935).
Affirmed.