Case Name: Gleston N. EDWARDS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2010-05-19
Citations: 35 So. 3d 121
Docket Number: No. 4D09-3309
Parties: Gleston N. EDWARDS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: WARNER, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 35
Pages: 121–121

Head Matter:
Gleston N. EDWARDS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D09-3309.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
May 19, 2010.
Gleston N. Edwards, Raiford, pro se.
No brief filed on behalf of appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The defendant appeals the denial of his Rule 3.800(a) motion, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence presented at trial. We affirm. A Rule 3.800(a) motion cannot be used to challenge the conviction. See Prince v. State, 903 So.2d 1068 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).
Affirmed.
WARNER, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur.