Case Name: Ansley vs. Hart
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1886
Citations: 1 Ga. L. Rep. 432
Docket Number: 
Parties: Ansley vs. Hart.
Judges: 
Reporter: Georgia Law Reporter
Volume: 1
Pages: 432–433

Head Matter:
Ansley vs. Hart.
Claim, from Soiiley. Deeds. Evidence. Lev}' and Sale. (Before Judge Fort.)

Opinion:
Blandford, J.
1. A marshal's deed, conveying property sold under a fi.fa. was not inadmissible in evidence because it was signed "James Longstreet, U. S. marshal for the Southern District of Georgia, by A. R. Wright, Dep."
2. A record showing that a petition had been filed against the claimant of property, by a party not connected with the present case for the purpose of having a ji. fa. which had been transferred to her, by virtue of a sale under which she claimed (title) entered satisfied, and that a consent decree had been taken declaring it not satisfied, was not admissible in evidence on behalf of the claimant, but was irrelevant to the issue on trial; but its admission was not such error as to work injury -to either party or to require a new trial.
J. C. Mathews; J. A. Ansley, by brief, for plaintiff in error.
B. B. Hinton, for defendant.
3. The exceptions to the charge of the court are without merit and the issues were fairly and fully submitted to the jury.
Judgment affirmed.