Case Name: Antonio Aba Garcia CRUZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-03-06
Citations: 810 So. 2d 1017
Docket Number: No. 4D01-4415
Parties: Antonio Aba Garcia CRUZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SHAHOOD, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 810
Pages: 1017–1017

Head Matter:
Antonio Aba Garcia CRUZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D01-4415.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
March 6, 2002.
Antonio Aba Garcia Cruz, Jesup, Georgia, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the denial of appellant's rule 3.850 motion and certify as a question of great public importance the same question certified in Stretcher v. State, 803 So.2d 813 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001):
WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?
SHAHOOD, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.