Case Name: Walter E. Park, Respondent, v. Edith Park, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1905-12
Citations: 110 A.D. 866
Docket Number: 
Parties: Walter E. Park, Respondent, v. Edith Park, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 110
Pages: 866–866

Head Matter:
Walter E. Park, Respondent, v. Edith Park, Appellant.
Appeal from an order.denying'a motion for leave to renew an application to,interpose,a supplemental answer.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
Considering the nature of the action, we think that the defendant should be allowed to serve a supplemental an'swer. The fact that She did not make, the affidavit is explained by her absence in Europe, sick. The order appealed from should be reversed and the motion granted. Present — O'Brien, P. J., Patterson (dissenting), Ingraham, Laughlin and Clarke, JJ. Order reversed and motion