Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Juan Carlos COMPIAN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-06-22
Citations: 382 F. App'x 413
Docket Number: No. 09-41224
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Juan Carlos COMPIAN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 382
Pages: 413–414

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Juan Carlos COMPIAN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-41224
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
June 22, 2010.
James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Molly Estelle Odom, Esq., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Juan Carlos Compian raises arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Betancourt, 586 F.3d 303, 308-09 (5th Cir.2009), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1920, 176 L.Ed.2d 390 (2010), which reaffirmed the holding in United States v. Gamez-Gonzalez, 319 F.3d 695, 700 (5th Cir.2003), that knowl edge of drug type and quantity is not a material element of the offense. The appellant's unopposed motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.