Case Name: MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant, v. Beatrice MILHOLIN, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-10-09
Citations: 608 So. 2d 850
Docket Number: No. 92-00443
Parties: MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant, v. Beatrice MILHOLIN, Appellee.
Judges: SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and HALL, J., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 608
Pages: 850–850

Head Matter:
MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant, v. Beatrice MILHOLIN, Appellee.
No. 92-00443.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Oct. 9, 1992.
Rehearing Denied Dec. 15, 1992.
Jonathan L. Alpert, and Linda Renate Hughes, Alpert, Josey & Grilli, P.A., Tampa, for appellant.
John A. Lloyd, Jr., St. Petersburg, for appellee.

Opinion:
BLUE, Judge.
Maryland Casualty Company appeals the circuit court's issuance of a writ of execution for enforcement of a worker's compensation order. We hold the trial court had the authority to issue a writ, because the worker's compensation order is not presently in the process of being modified and is therefore in full force and effect. Section 440.24(1), Fla.Stat. (1989); Grant-Sholk Constr. Co., Inc. v. Moore, 282 So.2d 634 (Fla.1973). We, however, reverse the writ because it does not conform to the period of temporary total disability reflected in Deputy Commissioner Daniel's order. We remand for the trial court to issue the writ for the period of temporary total disability set out in the order being enforced and to determine interest due on unpaid sums.
Reverse and remand.
SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and HALL, J., concur.