Case Name: Charla A. RAYBURN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Russ WEBB, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-04-06
Citations: 11 F. App'x 875
Docket Number: No. 00-35601; D.C. No. CV-00-00015-JWS
Parties: Charla A. RAYBURN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Russ WEBB, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before LEAVY, THOMAS, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 11
Pages: 875–876

Head Matter:
Charla A. RAYBURN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Russ WEBB, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 00-35601.
D.C. No. CV-00-00015-JWS.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 12, 2001 .
Decided April 6, 2001.
Before LEAVY, THOMAS, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Charla A. Rayburn appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of her action al leging violations of the Privacy Act. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Upon our de novo review, we affirm the district court. See Dittman v. State of Cal., 191 F.3d 1020, 1026-27 (9th Cir.1999), cert, denied, — U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 2717, 147 L.Ed.2d 982 (2000); Wilson v. A.H. Belo Corp., 87 F.3d 393, 396 (9th Cir.1996).
AFFIRMED.
. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.