Case Name: CASCADES BOXBOARD GROUP CT LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, v. UNITED STEEL WORKERS USW, LOCAL 1840, United Steel Workers, AFL-CIO, CLC, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-03-23
Citations: 370 F. App'x 177
Docket Number: Nos. 09-2546-cv(L), 09-2696-cv(XAP)
Parties: CASCADES BOXBOARD GROUP CT LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, v. UNITED STEEL WORKERS USW, LOCAL 1840, United Steel Workers, AFL-CIO, CLC, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants.
Judges: PRESENT: PIERRE N. LEVAL, ROBERT D. SACK, RICHARD C. WESLEY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 370
Pages: 177–177

Head Matter:
CASCADES BOXBOARD GROUP CT LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, v. UNITED STEEL WORKERS USW, LOCAL 1840, United Steel Workers, AFL-CIO, CLC, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants.
Nos. 09-2546-cv(L), 09-2696-cv(XAP).
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
March 23, 2010.
Linda L. Morkan (Richard F. Vitarelli and Nicole A. Bernabo, on the brief), Robinson & Cole LLP, Hartford, CT, for Appellant.
Thomas W. Meiklejohn, Livingston, Adler, Pulda, Meiklejohn & Kelly, P.C., Hartford, CT, for Appellee.
PRESENT: PIERRE N. LEVAL, ROBERT D. SACK, RICHARD C. WESLEY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
SUMMARY ORDER
Appellant Cascades Boxboard Group CT, LLC, appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Eginton, J.), which confirmed an arbitration award in favor of Appellee United Steel Workers, Local 1840, and United Steelworkers, AFL-CIO, CLC. We assume the parties' familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history, and the issues presented for review.
Reviewing under the highly deferential standard required for arbitration awards, see Major League Baseball Players Ass'n v. Garvey, 532 U.S. 504, 509, 121 S.Ct. 1724, 149 L.Ed.2d 740 (2001), we conclude the district court did not err in confirming the award. Nor did the court err in declining to award fees.
For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.