Case Name: Todd WILEY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2014-11-12
Citations: 475 S.W.3d 675
Docket Number: ED 100116
Parties: Todd WILEY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 475
Pages: 675–676

Head Matter:
Todd WILEY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
ED 100116
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION TWO
Filed: November 12, 2014
Jessica Hathaway, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 68101, for Mov-ant/Appellant.
Robert J, Bartholomew, Jr., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for, Respondent/Respondent
Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Todd Wiley , appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Brooks v. State, 242 S.W.3d 705, 708 (Mo.banc 2008). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2006, unless otherwise indicated.