Case Name: Thomas C. LAURITO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2012-03-23
Citations: 83 So. 3d 980
Docket Number: No. 5D11-644
Parties: Thomas C. LAURITO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: MONACO, TORPY and COHEN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 83
Pages: 980–980

Head Matter:
Thomas C. LAURITO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D11-644.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
March 23, 2012.
Thomas C. Laurito, Defuniak Springs, pro se.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kristen L. Davenport, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Although the trial court conducted an evidentiary hearing on Appellant's rule 3.850 motion, it failed to make findings of fact and conclusions of law as required by rule 3.850(d). Accordingly, we reverse and remand this cause with instructions that the trial court make the required findings. Dillbeck v. State, 882 So.2d 969 (Fla.2004).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
MONACO, TORPY and COHEN, JJ., concur.