Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Graylen WHEELER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-05-31
Citations: 473 F. App'x 302
Docket Number: No. 12-6409
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Graylen WHEELER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 473
Pages: 302–302

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Graylen WHEELER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-6409.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 24, 2012.
Decided: May 31, 2012.
Michael Graylen Wheeler, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Michael Graylen Wheeler appeals the district court's order denying his motion for sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Wheeler, No. 5:04-cr-00066-RLV-CH-1 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 1, 2012) We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.