Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gerald David MANCINI, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-08-16
Citations: 44 F. App'x 272
Docket Number: No. 01-16354; D.C. Nos. CV-00-06205-REC CR-95-05205-REC
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Gerald David MANCINI, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 44
Pages: 272–273

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Gerald David MANCINI, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 01-16354.
D.C. Nos. CV-00-06205-REC CR-95-05205-REC.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 12, 2002.
Decided Aug. 16, 2002.
Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, TASHIMA and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Gerald Mancini appeals pro se the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence for narcotics violations. Mancini contends that Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), renders his sentence unconstitutional. We recently held that the rule announced in Apprendi does not apply retroactively to cases on initial col lateral review. United States v. Sanchez-Cervantes, 282 F.3d 664 (9th Cir.2002). The district court's order is therefore
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.