Case Name: In the Matter of Joseph Bruno, Appellant, v. City of Poughkeepsie, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1986-06-23
Citations: 121 A.D.2d 629
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Joseph Bruno, Appellant, v City of Poughkeepsie, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 121
Pages: 629–630

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Joseph Bruno, Appellant, v City of Poughkeepsie, Respondent.

Opinion:
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for the wrongful termination of salary and benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law § 207-c, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Benson, J.), dated July 26, 1984, as, upon a stipulated set of facts, dismissed the plaintiffs cause of action to recover damages for the wrongful termination of salary and benefits.
Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
We agree with the findings of the court that the plaintiff has failed to show that his application for retirement was involuntary because it was caused by economic duress. Although the plaintiff may not have been able to afford a gap in benefits between the time he was receiving benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law § 207-c and the time he would begin to receive disability retirement benefits, "[financial pressures, even in the context of unequal bargaining power, do not constitute economic duress" (Grubel v Union Mut. Life Ins. Co., 54 AD2d 686). We do not find the facts of this case to be sufficient to constitute an involuntary retirement. Since the plaintiff voluntarily retired, he was no longer entitled to further payment of his full salary (see, General Municipal Law § 207-c [5]). Therefore, the plaintiffs employment was not wrongfully terminated by the City of Poughkeepsie. Gibbons, J. P., Brown, Weinstein and Hooper, JJ., concur.