Case Name: BRISTOL-MYERS COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAXATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1986-12-19
Citations: 9 N.J. Tax 88
Docket Number: 
Parties: BRISTOL-MYERS COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAXATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Tax Court Reports
Volume: 9
Pages: 88–89

Head Matter:
BRISTOL-MYERS COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAXATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued December 1, 1986
Decided December 19, 1986.
Before Judges PETRELLA, GAYNOR and SCALERA.
Gregory B. Reilly argued the cause for appellant (Lowenstein, Sandler, Brochin, Kohl, Fisher, Boylan & Meanor, attorneys; David W. Mills, Gregory B. Reilly and Susan A. Feeney on the brief).
Harry Haushalter argued the cause for respondent (W. Cary Edwards, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Michael R. Clancy of counsel; Harry Haushalter on the brief).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Bristol-Myers appeals from two separate judgments of the Tax Court involving the Corporation Business Tax Act, N.J.S.A. 54:10A-1 et seq. The opinion of Judge Richard M. Conley dismissing the complaint involving the tax years of 1971 through 1975 because they were filed beyond the applicable time limitations is reported at 3 N.J.Tax 451 (Tax Ct.1981) and the opinion of Judge Michael A. Andrew, Jr., dismissing the complaint involving the tax years 1976 and 1977 on the basis that the Director had correctly determined the net worth of plaintiffs subsidiary investments under the act is reported at 8 N.J.Tax 133 (Tax Ct.1986).
These judgments are affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in the reported opinions.