Case Name: Shephard Melzer et al., Respondents, v. Arthur Robbins et al., Appellants
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1983-07-12
Citations: 60 N.Y.2d 582
Docket Number: 
Parties: Shephard Melzer et al., Respondents, v Arthur Robbins et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 60
Pages: 582–583

Head Matter:
Shephard Melzer et al., Respondents, v Arthur Robbins et al., Appellants.
Decided July 12, 1983
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Michael Permut for appellants.
Joseph Di Benedetto for respondents.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reason stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (92 AD2d 540; see, also, Di Falco, Field & Lomenzo v Newburgh Dyeing Corp., 54 NY2d 715; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons.