Case Name: State of Connecticut v. Reliable Refuse, Inc., et al.
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1988-10-26
Citations: 17 Conn. App. 801
Docket Number: 6366
Parties: State of Connecticut v. Reliable Refuse, Inc., et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Appellate Reports
Volume: 17
Pages: 801–801

Head Matter:
State of Connecticut v. Reliable Refuse, Inc., et al.
(6366)
Dupont, C. J., Spallone and Foti, Js.
Argued October 4
decision released October 26, 1988
Albert G. Murphy, for the appellant (named defendant).
Eugene A. Cooney, for the appellee (plaintiff).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The named defendant is appealing from the judgment rendered for the plaintiff on the defendants' counterclaim following a directed verdict.
The defendants did not move to set aside the directed verdict, thereby limiting this court to a plain error standard of review. Practice Book § 4185; Pietrorazio v. Santopietro, 185 Conn. 510, 515, 441 A.2d 163 (1981); Denby v. Voloshin Cadillac, 3 Conn. App. 181, 183, 485 A.2d 1360, cert. dismissed, 196 Conn. 802, 491 A.2d 1105 (1985); Eagar v. Barron, 2 Conn. App. 468, 472, 480 A.2d 567 (1984).
An examination of the record fails to disclose plain error.
There is no error.