Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Christopher READ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-09-28
Citations: 698 F. App'x 173
Docket Number: No. 16-11199
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Christopher READ, Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before REAVLEY, SOUTHWICK, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 698
Pages: 173–173

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Christopher READ, Defendant-Appellant
No. 16-11199
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
September 28, 2017
James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Kevin Joel Page, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Dallas, TX, Peter Michael Fleury, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Fort Worth, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before REAVLEY, SOUTHWICK, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Read pled guilty to one count of possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance. On appeal, he argues the district court made a clearly erroneous factual finding regarding other criminal conduct and then relied on it for purposes of sentencing. We find no evidence that the district court made such a factual finding, but even if it did, it would have been harmless error. AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.