Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ignacio Esteban CONTRERAS-MEZA, also known as Tito Contreras-Meza, also known as Tito Romero, also known as Ignacio Tito Contreras-Meza, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-07-24
Citations: 537 F. App'x 399
Docket Number: No. 12-40813
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ignacio Esteban CONTRERAS-MEZA, also known as Tito Contreras-Meza, also known as Tito Romero, also known as Ignacio Tito Contreras-Meza, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 537
Pages: 399–399

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ignacio Esteban CONTRERAS-MEZA, also known as Tito Contreras-Meza, also known as Tito Romero, also known as Ignacio Tito Contreras-Meza, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-40813
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
July 24, 2013.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Timothy William Crooks, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ignacio Esteban ContrerasMeza has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Contreras-Meza has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Contreras-Meza's response. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.