Case Name: SUN STATE FORD, INC., Petitioner, v. Laverica BURCH, etc., et al., Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2004-12-02
Citations: 889 So. 2d 778
Docket Number: No. SC04-157
Parties: SUN STATE FORD, INC., Petitioner, v. Laverica BURCH, etc., et al., Respondents.
Judges: PARIENTE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 889
Pages: 778–779

Head Matter:
SUN STATE FORD, INC., Petitioner, v. Laverica BURCH, etc., et al., Respondents.
No. SC04-157.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Dec. 2, 2004.
Marissa I. Delinks of Hinshaw & Culbertson, LLP, Fort Lauderdale, FL, and Joshua G. Vincent of Hinshaw and Culbertson, LLP, Chicago, IL, for Petitioner.
Daryl D. Parks of Parks and Crump, LLC, Tallahassee, FL, on behalf of Laveri-ca Burch, Ny’ Jae Aaliyah Miles, Regina Pace, Akeiad D. Miles and Aaryon Miles; and Warren B. Kwavnick of Cooney, Matt-son, Lance, Blackburn, Richards and O’Conner, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, FL, on behalf of Willie Gene Beauford, Jr., for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Burch v. Sun State Ford, Inc., 864 So.2d 466 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004), a decision which the district court of appeal certified to be in direct conflict with the decision of another district court pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4) of the Florida Constitution. Upon further consideration, we have determined that there is no actual conflict and that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction of this cause. Accordingly, this review proceeding is hereby dismissed.
It is so ordered.
PARIENTE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.