Case Name: HUGH F. CULVERHOUSE, JR., P.A., and Hugh F. Culverhouse, Jr., Esq., Appellants, v. James BARTH, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1997-09-24
Citations: 699 So. 2d 795
Docket Number: No. 97-1900
Parties: HUGH F. CULVERHOUSE, JR., P.A., and Hugh F. Culverhouse, Jr., Esq., Appellants, v. James BARTH, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GODERICH and SORONDO, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 699
Pages: 795–796

Head Matter:
HUGH F. CULVERHOUSE, JR., P.A., and Hugh F. Culverhouse, Jr., Esq., Appellants, v. James BARTH, Appellee.
No. 97-1900.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Sept. 24, 1997.
Walton, Lantaff, Sehroeder & Carson and G. Bart Billbrough, Miami, for appellants.
Oscar Syger, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GODERICH and SORONDO, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the appellee's response, the purported final judgment under review is summarily reversed pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(b), and the cause is remanded for entry of an order of the type set out in Del Castillo v. Ralor Pharmacy, Inc., 512 So.2d 315, 319 n. 11 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). See Martinez v. Marin, 700 So.2d 439 (1997) and cases cited; Miami Columbus, Inc. v. Ramlawi, 687 So.2d 1378, 1381 n. 4 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997), review denied, 697 So.2d 511 (Fla.1997).
Reversed.
. We now address only the form of the order below; the merits of the underlying ruling will be considered only on appeal from a properly entered final judgment or a non-final order reviewable under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130.