Case Name: EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FOTOMAT CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1971-04-21
Citations: 441 F.2d 1079
Docket Number: No. 71-1390
Parties: EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FOTOMAT CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 441
Pages: 1079–1081

Head Matter:
EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FOTOMAT CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 71-1390.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 21, 1971.
Rehearing Denied and Rehearing En Bane Denied June 21, 1971.
Wisdom, Circuit Judge, dissented and filed opinion.
Miles J. Alexander, Thomas C. Shelton, Jerre B. Swann, Richard R. Cheatham, Atlanta, Ga., Gary H. Wiles, La Jolla, Cal., for defendant-appellant.
John R. Crenshaw, Daniel B. Hodgson, Atlanta, Ga., Joseph L. McEntee, Jr., David L. Hoffberg, Rochester, N. Y., Alston, Miller & Gaines, Atlanta, Ga., Nixon, Hargrave, Devans & Doyle, Rochester, N. Y., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before WISDOM, COLEMAN and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
BY THE COURT:
It is ordered that appellee's motion to dismiss as untimely Fotomat's appeal from the preliminary injunction granted below, D.C., 317 F.Supp. 304, filed in the above styled and numbered cause, is hereby granted. We deem the attempted appeal to be time-barred.