Case Name: Robert B. BROUGHTON, Jr.; Celeste G. Broughton, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. John N. McCLAIN, Jr.; Robert Galey; Wells Fargo & Company, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-05-18
Citations: 602 F. App'x 133
Docket Number: No. 15-1045
Parties: Robert B. BROUGHTON, Jr.; Celeste G. Broughton, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. John N. McCLAIN, Jr.; Robert Galey; Wells Fargo & Company, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 602
Pages: 133–133

Head Matter:
Robert B. BROUGHTON, Jr.; Celeste G. Broughton, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. John N. McCLAIN, Jr.; Robert Galey; Wells Fargo & Company, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15-1045.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 13, 2015.
Decided: May 18, 2015.
Robert B. Broughton, Jr., Celeste G. Broughton, Appellants Pro Se. William Sidney Aldridge, Nicholls & Crampton, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina; Debbie Weston Harden, Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER C.URIAM:
Robert B. Broughton, Jr. and Celeste G. Broughton appeal the district court's order denying their motion for sanctions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis- and dismiss the appeal for- the reasons stated by the district court. Broughton v. McClain, 587 Fed.Appx. 81 (E.D.N.C.2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.