Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Ronnie M. SHOECRAFT, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-01-17
Citations: 181 S.W.3d 625
Docket Number: No. WD 64438
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Ronnie M. SHOECRAFT, Appellant.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. ULRICH, P.J., PATRICIA A. BRECKENRIDGE, and JAMES M. SMART, JR., JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 181
Pages: 625–626

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Ronnie M. SHOECRAFT, Appellant.
No. WD 64438.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jan. 17, 2006.
Virgil Dean Rodgers, II, Tipton, MO, for Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Deborah Daniels, Asst. Atty. Gen., joins on the briefs, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before ROBERT G. ULRICH, P.J., PATRICIA A. BRECKENRIDGE, and JAMES M. SMART, JR., JJ.

Opinion:
Order
PER CURIAM.
Ronnie M. Shoeeraft appeals his conviction for driving while intoxicated. Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).