Case Name: Shawn BARR, et al., Plaintiffs, Jeffrey Yarmak, Appellant, v. SPRINT CORP., et al., Defendants, George A. Barton and Law Offices of Herbert Hafif, Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-03-08
Citations: 163 S.W.3d 452
Docket Number: No. WD 61739
Parties: Shawn BARR, et al., Plaintiffs, Jeffrey Yarmak, Appellant, v. SPRINT CORP., et al., Defendants, George A. Barton and Law Offices of Herbert Hafif, Respondents.
Judges: Before HOWARD, P.J., ULRICH and BRECKENRIDGE, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 163
Pages: 452–452

Head Matter:
Shawn BARR, et al., Plaintiffs, Jeffrey Yarmak, Appellant, v. SPRINT CORP., et al., Defendants, George A. Barton and Law Offices of Herbert Hafif, Respondents.
No. WD 61739.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
March 8, 2005.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 3, 2005.
Application for Transfer Denied June 21, 2005.
Dennis Owens, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
George A. Barton, Kansas City, MO, for respondent.
Before HOWARD, P.J., ULRICH and BRECKENRIDGE, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Jeffery Yarmak appeals the trial court's judgment in favor of the Law Office of Herbert Hafif and the Law Office of George A. Barton, P.C. on the law firms' motion to enforce an attorney's lien. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).