Case Name: Robert E. BONDURANT, etc., Petitioner, v. Nickolas P. GEEKER, Judge, etc., Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1987-11-12
Citations: 515 So. 2d 214
Docket Number: No. 70090
Parties: Robert E. BONDURANT, etc., Petitioner, v. Nickolas P. GEEKER, Judge, etc., Respondent.
Judges: McDonald, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW, BARRETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 515
Pages: 214–214

Head Matter:
Robert E. BONDURANT, etc., Petitioner, v. Nickolas P. GEEKER, Judge, etc., Respondent.
No. 70090.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Nov. 12, 1987.
Danny L. Kepner of Shell, Fleming, Davis and Menge, Pensacola, for petitioner.
Richard P. Warfield and M. Robert Blanchard of Levin, Warfield, Middle-brooks, Mabie, Thomas, Mayes & Mitchell, P.A., Pensacola, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We accepted jurisdiction to review Bon-durant v. Geeker, 499 So.2d 909 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), based on apparent conflict with Public Health Trust v. Knuck, 495 So.2d 834 (Fla.3d DCA 1986), and Brogan v. Mullins, 452 So.2d 940 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984). Upon closer examination, we find no express and direct conflict of decisions as is required by article V, section 3(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution. Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for review as improvidently granted.
It is so ordered.
McDonald, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW, BARRETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.