Case Name: John Constantine agt. John S. Van Winkle
Court: New York Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1846-09
Citations: 2 How. Pr. 273
Docket Number: 
Parties: John Constantine agt. John S. Van Winkle.
Judges: 
Reporter: Howard's Practice Reports
Volume: 2
Pages: 273–273

Head Matter:
John Constantine agt. John S. Van Winkle.
On a motion for re-taxation of costs, the moving party should show affirmatively, ly affidavit, how the bill was taxed, and what items were objected to, before the taxing officer. (Nee 1 Howard, 136.)
September Term, 1846.
Motion by plaintiff for re-taxation of costs.
The plaintiff moved for re-taxation of costs in this cause, but did not produce any affidavit stating the objections before the taxing officer, or how the bill was taxed.
E. Sandford, plaintiff's counsel.
Sandfords & Porter, plaintiff's attcyrneys.
M. T. Reynolds, defendant's counsel.
A, H. Wallis, defendant's attorney.

Opinion:
Bronson, Chief Justice.
Denied the motion with costs, on the ground that the moving party did not produce an affida- ' vit showing how the bill of costs was. taxed, before the taxing officer.