Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gabriel GENORE-JIMENEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-03-01
Citations: 223 F. App'x 683
Docket Number: No. 06-30438
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gabriel GENORE-JIMENEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 223
Pages: 683–684

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gabriel GENORE-JIMENEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-30438.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 20, 2007 .
Filed March 1, 2007.
Stephen Gunnels, Eugene, OR, Stephen F. Peifer, Esq. USPO-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Portland, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Kelley Beckley, Eugene, OR, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: BEEZER, FERNANDEZ, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Gabriel Genore-Jimenez appeals from the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to possession with the intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841. We dismiss.
Genore-Jimenez entered into a valid appeal waiver as part of a written plea agreement.
He contends, however, for the first time in his reply brief, that the appeal waiver is unconscionable and therefore unenforceable because the government is not also barred by the plea agreement from an appeal. However, we need not address this contention because Genore-Jiminez failed to timely raise it in his opening brief. See United States v. Ullah, 976 F.2d 509, 514 (9th Cir.1992) (stating that this court will not ordinarily consider matters on appeal that are not specifically and distinctly argued in appellant's opening brief).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.