Case Name: Alan HAMPTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2019-07-30
Citations: 578 S.W.3d 864
Docket Number: WD 81637
Parties: Alan HAMPTON, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 578
Pages: 864–864

Head Matter:
Alan HAMPTON, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
WD 81637
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Filed: July 30, 2019
S. Kate Webber, Kansas City for appellant.
Daniel N. McPherson, Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before Division Two: Lisa White Hardwick, Presiding Judge, Thomas H. Newton and Mark D. Pfeiffer, Judges
ORDER

Opinion:
Per Curiam
Alan Hampton appeals the dismissal of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief as untimely. He contends the motion court clearly erred in dismissing his motion because the untimely filing of his pro se motion was excused on the basis that it was due to circumstances beyond his control. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment of dismissal. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value.
AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b)