Case Name: Dorothy Dubberke, Respondent, v. Earl F. Kunker and Clark Halliday, Appellants; Mabel E. Schlegel, Respondent, v. Earl F. Kunker and Clark Halliday, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1929-05
Citations: 226 A.D. 842
Docket Number: 
Parties: Dorothy Dubberke, Respondent, v. Earl F. Kunker and Clark Halliday, Appellants. Mabel E. Schlegel, Respondent, v. Earl F. Kunker and Clark Halliday, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 226
Pages: 842–843

Head Matter:
Dorothy Dubberke, Respondent, v. Earl F. Kunker and Clark Halliday, Appellants. Mabel E. Schlegel, Respondent, v. Earl F. Kunker and Clark Halliday, Appellants.

Opinion:
As to the defendant Kunker the judgments are affirmed, with costs in one action. As to the defendant Halliday the judgments are reversed on the law and facts, with costs, and the complaints dismissed, with costs in one action. Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman, Whitmyer, Hill and Hasbrouck, JJ., concur.