Case Name: Keith Tyrone JOHNSON; Curtis A. Norfleet; William R. Snyder; John Pittman; Robert A. Ward, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Helen F. FAHEY; Virginia Parole Board Members, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-02-16
Citations: 121 F. App'x 537
Docket Number: No. 04-7677
Parties: Keith Tyrone JOHNSON; Curtis A. Norfleet; William R. Snyder; John Pittman; Robert A. Ward, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Helen F. FAHEY; Virginia Parole Board Members, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 121
Pages: 537–537

Head Matter:
Keith Tyrone JOHNSON; Curtis A. Norfleet; William R. Snyder; John Pittman; Robert A. Ward, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Helen F. FAHEY; Virginia Parole Board Members, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 04-7677.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 9, 2005.
Decided: Feb. 16, 2005.
Keith Tyrone Johnson; Curtis A. Nor-fleet; William R. Snyder; John Pittman; Robert A. Ward, Appellants pro se.
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by published per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Keith Tyrone Johnson, Curtis A. Nor-fleet, William R. Snyder, John Pittman, and Robert A. Ward appeal the district court's order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Norfleet v. Fahey, CA-04-1075 (E.D.Va. Sept. 28, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED