Case Name: William R. BURKETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-04-22
Citations: 275 F. App'x 587
Docket Number: No. 07-35827
Parties: William R. BURKETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 275
Pages: 587–587

Head Matter:
William R. BURKETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 07-35827.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 15, 2008.
Filed April 22, 2008.
William R. Burkett, pro se.
L. Jamala Edwards, Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel, Seattle, WA, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before: B. FLETCHER, FISHER and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
A review of the record, the opening brief, and the response to this court's January 11, 2008 order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). It does not appear that the district court erred in denying appellant's motion for an agency hearing where the requested hearing had already occurred. See Weeks v. Bayer, 246 F.3d 1231, 1234 (9th Cir.2001) (stating standard of review of a district court's denial of a motion to reopen a judgment).
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.
All pending motions and requests are denied as moot.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.