Case Name: Ronnie GREEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1987-10-14
Citations: 513 So. 2d 794
Docket Number: No. 87-0365
Parties: Ronnie GREEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ANSTEAD, LETTS and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 513
Pages: 794–795

Head Matter:
Ronnie GREEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 87-0365.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Oct. 14, 1987.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Jeffrey L. Anderson, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Jr., Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Eddie J. Bell, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The trial court, pursuant to an earlier possession and sale of cocaine conviction, imposed a sentence which was one cell above the recommended guidelines range, indicating on the sentencing scoresheet, that it was doing so because of a "violation of probation." However, the "violation of probation" referred to was not probation for the possession and sale of cocaine conviction, but for another distinct crime of which appellant had also been convicted.
Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(14) appears to intend a one cell upward departure for sentences relating to the crime for which the probation was revoked. Meadows v. State, 498 So.2d 1018 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).
Accordingly, we reverse and remand for resentencing within the guidelines.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
ANSTEAD, LETTS and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.