Case Name: Arvid J. CARLSON, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1928-10-15
Citations: 28 F.2d 1008
Docket Number: No. 5357
Parties: Arvid J. CARLSON, Plaintiff In Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant In Error.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 28
Pages: 1008–1008

Head Matter:
Arvid J. CARLSON, Plaintiff In Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant In Error.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
October 15, 1928.
No. 5357.
Edward H. Chavelle, of Seattle, Wash., for plaintiff in error.
Anthony Savage, U. S. Atty., and Jeffrey Heiman, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Seattle, Wash.
Before RUDKIN, DIETRICH, and HUNT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.
This is a writ of error to review a judgment of conviction under the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA). There was testimony on the part of the government tending to show that government agents entered the hotel of which the plaintiff in error was the proprietor, in the city of Seattle, and as one of the agents approached the room occupied by the plaintiff in error he saw through the open door several persons drinHng intoxicating liquor and a bottle of intoxicating Equor on the dresser. The plaintiff in error was thereupon arrested and the Equor seized. The only question presented by the record is the il-legaEty of the search and seizure. But inasmuch as the offense was committed in the immediate presence of the officer, no warrant of arrest or search warrant was neeessary, and the legality of the search and seizure does not enter into the case.
The judgment is affirmed.