Case Name: Patricia Curzio, Respondent, v. Raymond Tancredi, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2004-06-28
Citations: 8 A.D.3d 608
Docket Number: 
Parties: Patricia Curzio, Respondent, v Raymond Tancredi, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 8
Pages: 608–608

Head Matter:
Patricia Curzio, Respondent, v Raymond Tancredi, Appellant.
[778 NYS2d 910]

Opinion:
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Lebowitz, J.), dated August 8, 2003, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
To prove a prima facie case of negligence in a slip-and-fall case, a plaintiff is required to show that the defendant created the condition which caused the accident or that the defendant had actual or constructive notice of the condition (see Luciani v Waldbaum, Inc., 304 AD2d 537 [2003]; Goldman v Waldbaum, Inc., 248 AD2d 436 [1998]). Accordingly, on the defendant's motion, he was required to make a prima facie showing of entitlement to summary judgment by establishing that he neither created nor had actual or constructive notice of the condition (see Luciani v Waldbaum, Inc., supra). The evidence submitted by the defendant in the form of the parties' testimony at their examinations before trial failed to establish that the defendant did not create the condition. Therefore, the Supreme Court properly denied the motion. Altman, J.P., Goldstein, Schmidt, Cozier and Skelos, JJ., concur.