Case Name: Guy Sicurella et al., Respondents, v. 111 Chelsea, LLC, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2009-11-24
Citations: 67 A.D.3d 996
Docket Number: 
Parties: Guy Sicurella et al., Respondents, v 111 Chelsea, LLC, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 67
Pages: 996–996

Head Matter:
Guy Sicurella et al., Respondents, v 111 Chelsea, LLC, Appellant.
[888 NYS2d 752]

Opinion:
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brandveen, J.), dated May 12, 2009, as denied its motion pursuant to CPLR 3215 (c) to dismiss the complaint as abandoned.
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with costs, and the defendant's motion pursuant to CPLR 3215 (c) to dismiss the complaint as abandoned is granted.
To avoid dismissal of the complaint as abandoned pursuant to CPLR 3215 (c), the plaintiffs were required to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for their delay in seeking a default judgment and a meritorious cause of action {see Costello v Reilly, 36 AD3d 581 [2007]; Kay Waterproofing Corp. v Ray Realty Fulton, Inc., 23 AD3d 624 [2005]). Here, the plaintiffs failed to offer a reasonable excuse for the three-year delay in seeking a default judgment. Accordingly, the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant's motion pursuant to CPLR 3215 (c) to dismiss the complaint as abandoned. Fisher, J.P., Santucci, Dickerson, Chambers and Lott, JJ., concur.