Case Name: CITY BANK FARMERS TRUST COMPANY, EXECUTOR, ETC., APPELLANT, v. JOHN McCUTCHEON, COMPTROLLER OF NEW JERSEY, ET AL., RESPONDENTS
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1931-04-24
Citations: 108 N.J.L. 185
Docket Number: 
Parties: CITY BANK FARMERS TRUST COMPANY, EXECUTOR, ETC., APPELLANT, v. JOHN McCUTCHEON, COMPTROLLER OF NEW JERSEY, ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 108
Pages: 185–185

Head Matter:
CITY BANK FARMERS TRUST COMPANY, EXECUTOR, ETC., APPELLANT, v. JOHN McCUTCHEON, COMPTROLLER OF NEW JERSEY, ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Argued February 5, 1931
Decided April 24, 1931.
For the appellant, Russell L. Bradford (of the Yew York bar), Walter E. Cooper (on the brief).
For the respondents, William A. Stevens, attorney-general.

Opinion:
Pee Cueiam.
The judgment under review should be affirmed, for the reasons given in the per curiam opinion of the Supreme Court, so far as it treats of the matters argued on this appeal. The point relating to the method of valuation, which is discussed by the Supreme Court, is not argued here and we have not considered it.
For affirmance — Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Daly, Donges, Van Buskirk, Dear, JJ. 8.
For reversal — Bodine, Kays, JJ. 2.