Case Name: Sarah M. Hurwitz, Respondent, v. Samuel Hurwitz, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1957-03-26
Citations: 3 A.D.2d 744
Docket Number: 
Parties: Sarah M. Hurwitz, Respondent, v. Samuel Hurwitz, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 3
Pages: 744–744

Head Matter:
Sarah M. Hurwitz, Respondent, v. Samuel Hurwitz, Appellant.

Opinion:
Order unanimously reversed and the motion granted. Plaintiff has failed to establish special circumstances which would warrant a departure from the general rule denying examinations before trial in matrimonial actions. The mere fact that one of the causes of action alleged in the complaint is based on nonsupport is insufficient to establish special circumstances under subdivision 6 of rule XI of the New York County Supreme Court Trial Term Rules (Liebmann v. IAebmann, 3 A D 2d 660). Concur — Breitel, J. P., Botein, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ.