Case Name: Charles E. Jaeckle and Wilbur F. Aurnhammer, on behalf of themselves, &c., complainants-appellants, v. L. Bamberger & Company, a body corporate, defendant-respondent
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1936-04-24
Citations: 120 N.J. Eq. 201
Docket Number: 
Parties: Charles E. Jaeckle and Wilbur F. Aurnhammer, on behalf of themselves, &c., complainants-appellants, v. L. Bamberger & Company, a body corporate, defendant-respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 120
Pages: 201–201

Head Matter:
Charles E. Jaeckle and Wilbur F. Aurnhammer, on behalf of themselves, &c., complainants-appellants, v. L. Bamberger & Company, a body corporate, defendant-respondent.
[Submitted February term, 1936.
Decided April 24th, 1936.]
Mr. Sydney A. Gutkin (Mr. I. Herbert Levy, of counsel), for the appellants.
Messrs. Pitney, Hardin & Skinner (Mr. Charles R. Hardin, of counsel), for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree dismissing the bill of complaint is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the learned vice-chancellor.
The question of the jurisdiction of equity to grant the relief sought by complainants is reserved.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, WolfsKeil, JJ. 9.
For reversal — Lloyd, Pebsiue, Raffeety, JJ. 3.