Case Name: James William BERRY, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Toby F. SHY, Sheriff; James H. Booten, Commissioner; Rick Wellman, Commissioner; Charles Sammons, Commissioner; Tim Jarrell, Correctional Officer, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-02-06
Citations: 86 F. App'x 621
Docket Number: No. 03-7596
Parties: James William BERRY, Sr., Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Toby F. SHY, Sheriff; James H. Booten, Commissioner; Rick Wellman, Commissioner; Charles Sammons, Commissioner; Tim Jarrell, Correctional Officer, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 86
Pages: 621–622

Head Matter:
James William BERRY, Sr., Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Toby F. SHY, Sheriff; James H. Booten, Commissioner; Rick Wellman, Commissioner; Charles Sammons, Commissioner; Tim Jarrell, Correctional Officer, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 03-7596.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 29, 2004.
Decided Feb. 6, 2004.
James William Berry, Sr., Appellant pro se. Tanya Annette Hunt, MacCorkle, Lavender, Casey & Sweeney, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
James William Berry, Sr., appeals from the district court's order denying relief in his action in which he asserted claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000), and the Americans with Disabilities Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Berry v. Shy, No. CA-00-604-3 (S.D.W.Va. Sept. 30, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
In light of the disposition of the federal claims, the district court dismissed Berry's claim under the West Virginia Freedom of Information Act, without prejudice to his rights to file such claim in state court.