Case Name: HARRY M. WILSON, RESPONDENT, v. DISTRICT COURT, FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT MONMOUTH COUNTY, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1920-10-15
Citations: 95 N.J.L. 265
Docket Number: 
Parties: HARRY M. WILSON, RESPONDENT, v. DISTRICT COURT, FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT MONMOUTH COUNTY, APPELLANT.
Judges: For affirmance — The Chibe Justice, Swayze, TreN-CHARD, BERGEN, IÍALISCH, BLACK, KaTZENBACPI, Wl-IITE, HePPENI-IEIMER, WILLIAMS, TAYLOR, GARDNER, AOKERSON, JJ. 13.
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 95
Pages: 265–266

Head Matter:
HARRY M. WILSON, RESPONDENT, v. DISTRICT COURT, FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT MONMOUTH COUNTY, APPELLANT.
Submitted July 5, 1920
Decided October 15, 1920.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is re-23orted in 93 N. J. L. 103.
For the respondent, Charles F. O'oolc.
For the appellant., Lloyd C. Biddle.

Opinion:
Pee Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court. ' - '
For affirmance — The Chibe Justice, Swayze, TreN-CHARD, BERGEN, IÍALISCH, BLACK, KaTZENBACPI, Wl-IITE, HePPENI-IEIMER, WILLIAMS, TAYLOR, GARDNER, AOKERSON, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.