Case Name: BARNES against FAIRHOLME
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1810-02
Citations: 3 N.J.L. 631
Docket Number: 
Parties: BARNES against FAIRHOLME.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 3
Pages: 213–213

Head Matter:
BARNES against FAIRHOLME.
ON CERTIORARI.
The state of demand on which the action b.elow was founded, was as follows:

Opinion:
By the Court.
The state of demand is insensible; an action cannot be sustained for cash paid, unless paid by mistake, or under other particular circumstances, which ought to be set out in the state of demand.
Judgment reversed.
Cited in Denny v. Quintin, 4 Dutch. 134.