Case Name: Jerry TISHMAN and Robert Piasio, Appellants, v. David SINGER, Murray Galbraith, Singer Consultants, Inc., a foreign corporation, and/or Singer Chiropractic Consultants, Inc., a foreign corporation, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-02-08
Citations: 537 So. 2d 718
Docket Number: No. 87-3055
Parties: Jerry TISHMAN and Robert Piasio, Appellants, v. David SINGER, Murray Galbraith, Singer Consultants, Inc., a foreign corporation, and/or Singer Chiropractic Consultants, Inc., a foreign corporation, Appellees.
Judges: GLICKSTEIN and GARRETT, JJ., and KAHN, MARTIN D., Associate Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 537
Pages: 718–718

Head Matter:
Jerry TISHMAN and Robert Piasio, Appellants, v. David SINGER, Murray Galbraith, Singer Consultants, Inc., a foreign corporation, and/or Singer Chiropractic Consultants, Inc., a foreign corporation, Appellees.
No. 87-3055.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb. 8, 1989.
Donald S. Hershman of Donald S. Hersh-man, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellants.
Mark B. Kleinfeld, of Jones & Foster, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the summary final judgment entered as to Count I and II, but decline to consider Count IV. The order directed to Count IV is not appealable per Rule 9.130 or Rule 9.030, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. White Palms of Palm Beach, Inc., v. Fox, 525 So.2d 518 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); Russell v. Russell, 507 So.2d 661 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Paint v. Pompano Beach Bank & Trust Co., 208 So.2d 152 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968). Consideration of all of the issues and arguments raised by appellant establishes that there are no genuine issues of fact left to be resolved and that the lower court correctly resolved Counts I and II.
AFFIRMED as to Counts I and II, and DISMISSED as to Count IV.
GLICKSTEIN and GARRETT, JJ., and KAHN, MARTIN D., Associate Judge, concur.