Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ervin E. TUCKER, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-03-19
Citations: 31 F. App'x 539
Docket Number: No. 01-10184; D.C. No. CR-00-00417-LKK
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Ervin E. TUCKER, Jr., Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 31
Pages: 539–540

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Ervin E. TUCKER, Jr., Defendant—Appellant.
No. 01-10184. D.C. No. CR-00-00417-LKK.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 11, 2002 .
Decided March 19, 2002.
Before FARRIS, W. FLETCHER, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Ervin E. Tucker Jr. appeals his guilty plea conviction and sentence for wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343. Tucker's attorney has moved to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), on the ground that the case presents no non-frivolous issue suitable for appeal. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), reveals no arguable issues.
Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.