Case Name: Brian BACCHUS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTHEASTERN MECHANICAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-11-17
Citations: 453 F. App'x 384
Docket Number: No. 11-1890
Parties: Brian BACCHUS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTHEASTERN MECHANICAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 453
Pages: 384–384

Head Matter:
Brian BACCHUS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTHEASTERN MECHANICAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 11-1890.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 15, 2011.
Decided: Nov. 17, 2011.
Brian Bacchus, Appellant Pro Se. David W. Long-Daniels, Natasha L. Wilson, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Atlanta, Georgia; John Francis Scalia, Greenberg Trau-rig, LLP, McLean, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Brian Bacchus appeals the district court's order granting appellee's summary judgment motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Bacchus' motion for a subpoena and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bacchus v. Southeastern Mech. Servs., Inc., No. 8:10-cv-01684-RWT, 2011 WL 3022397 (D.Md. July 21, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.