Case Name: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. EMILIO RODRIQUEZ, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1994-03-15
Citations: 135 N.J. 3
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. EMILIO RODRIQUEZ, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 135
Pages: 3–3

Head Matter:
637 A.2d 914
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. EMILIO RODRIQUEZ, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Argued February 15, 1994
Decided March 15, 1994.
Joan D. Van Pelt, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant (Susan L. Reisner, Acting Public Defender, attorney; Ms. Van Pelt and Katherine Lusby, Designated Counsel, of counsel and on the brief).
Carol M. Henderson, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Deborah T. Poritz, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the Appellate Division opinion, reported at 264 N.J.Super. 261, 624 A.2d 605 (1993).