Case Name: Charles MOORE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-11-29
Citations: 770 So. 2d 1291
Docket Number: No. 3D00-2035
Parties: Charles MOORE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and LEVY and SORONDO, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 770
Pages: 1291–1292

Head Matter:
Charles MOORE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D00-2035.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 29, 2000.
Charles Moore, in proper person.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Paulette R. Taylor, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and LEVY and SORONDO, JJ.

Opinion:
CONFESSION OF ERROR
PER CURIAM.
Charles Moore challenges the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief upon the grounds that the motion was untimely. The state properly concedes that the motion was timely filed within two years of the date of the mandate in his direct appeal. See Huff v. State, 569 So.2d 1247 (Fla.1990). Accordingly, the denial of the motion is reversed and remanded for consideration of the merits of Moore's claim.