Case Name: David MCKEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer WALKER; Arlington County Jail, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-11-10
Citations: 112 F. App'x 915
Docket Number: No. 04-7221
Parties: David MCKEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer WALKER; Arlington County Jail, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 112
Pages: 915–915

Head Matter:
David MCKEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer WALKER; Arlington County Jail, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 04-7221.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 4, 2004.
Decided: Nov. 10, 2004.
David McKee, Appellant pro se.
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
David McKee appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See McKee v. Walker, No. CA-04-86 (E.D.Va. July 16, 2004). We deny McKee's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED