Case Name: Thomas Sconzo et al., Respondents, v. Edward Flower et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1998-03-09
Citations: 248 A.D.2d 458
Docket Number: 
Parties: Thomas Sconzo et al., Respondents, v Edward Flower et al., Appellants.
Judges: Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Ritter and Krausman, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 248
Pages: 458–458

Head Matter:
Thomas Sconzo et al., Respondents, v Edward Flower et al., Appellants.

Opinion:
—In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Oshrin, J.), dated January 13, 1997, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
[668 NYS2d 934]
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Material issues of fact exist which require the denial of the
defendants' motion for summary judgment.
Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Ritter and Krausman, JJ., concur.