Case Name: Sebastian SAMMARTINO, Individually and as Husband, and Sebastian Sammartino, as guardian of Eleanor Sammartino, incompetent, Appellant, v. Loretta K. BUTT-BAKER, Jackie D. Armstrong, and VSM Trucking, Inc., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-05-27
Citations: 599 So. 2d 263
Docket Number: No. 91-01997
Parties: Sebastian SAMMARTINO, Individually and as Husband, and Sebastian Sammartino, as guardian of Eleanor Sammartino, incompetent, Appellant, v. Loretta K. BUTT-BAKER, Jackie D. Armstrong, and VSM Trucking, Inc., Appellees.
Judges: RYDER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON, J., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 599
Pages: 263–264

Head Matter:
Sebastian SAMMARTINO, Individually and as Husband, and Sebastian Sammartino, as guardian of Eleanor Sammartino, incompetent, Appellant, v. Loretta K. BUTT-BAKER, Jackie D. Armstrong, and VSM Trucking, Inc., Appellees.
No. 91-01997.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
May 27, 1992.
Robert V. Greene of Lusk, Drasites & Tolisano, P.A., Cape Coral, for appellant.
Gerald W. Pierce of Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, P.A., Fort Myers, for appellees Jackie D. Armstrong and VSM Trucking, Inc.

Opinion:
FRANK, Judge.
In this automobile negligence action the trial judge granted summary judgment m favor of the owner and driver of the truck that struck the Sammartinos' vehicle, on the ground that the accident was caused when a third car pulled out in front of the truck. Because there remain genuine is sues of material fact, we reverse the summary judgment in favor of Jackie Armstrong and YSM Trucking, Inc.
This accident occurred when Armstrong, travelling west on State Road 84 (Alligator Alley), veered to avoid a car driven by Butt-Baker, who had pulled out into Alligator Alley in front of Armstrong from a side road. Armstrong's truck crossed the center line and collided with the pickup truck driven by Sebastian Sammartino. Sammar-tino's wife, Eleanor, sustained significant injuries in the accident, including brain damage.
By ruling in favor of Armstrong and VSM, the trial judge rejected entirely the testimony of Butt-Baker and her husband that Armstrong was travelling at an unsafe speed. Although the trial judge specifically declared that he had not weighed the credibility of the parties, it is obvious that he did so in forming the conclusion that the depositions of Butt-Baker and her husband, Stanley Baker, were full of guesswork and conjecture. In addition to the question of Armstrong's speed, other issues to be decided by a jury include whether Armstrong was inattentive and whether he could have taken evasive action to avoid the collision with the Sammartino vehicle.
We reverse the summary judgment and remand for further proceedings.
RYDER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON, J., concur.