Case Name: STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Michael LEE, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2014-01-24
Citations: 135 So. 3d 373
Docket Number: No. 5D12-4793
Parties: STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Michael LEE, Appellee.
Judges: COHEN and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 135
Pages: 373–373

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Michael LEE, Appellee.
No. 5D12-4793.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Jan. 24, 2014.
Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied Feb. 27, 2014.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kristen L. Davenport, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
William R. Ponall, of Snure & Ponall, P.A., Winter Park and Matthew P. Ferry, of Law Offices of Warren W. Lindsey, Winter Park, for Appellee.

Opinion:
EVANDER, J.
The State appeals the trial court's order granting Michael Lee's motion to dismiss the amended information that charged him with attempting to solicit a minor for sexual activity using an electronic device or internet server, and traveling to meet a minor for unlawful sexual activity after first using an electronic device or internet service to attempt to solicit the minor. We reverse.
The trial court granted Lee's dismissal motion based on Lee's argument that a defendant could not be convicted under the statute unless there was direct communication between the defendant and a child or person believed by the defendant to be a child. We recently rejected this argument in State v. Wilson, 128 So.3d 946 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013). For the reasons articulated in Wilson, we reverse the instant order, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
COHEN and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
. § 847.0135(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2011).
. § 847.0135(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (2011).