Case Name: Colclough v. Walker; and vice versa
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1916-11-22
Citations: 19 Ga. App. 23
Docket Number: 7564, 7565
Parties: Colclough v. Walker; and vice versa.
Judges: 
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 19
Pages: 23–23

Head Matter:
7564, 7565.
Colclough v. Walker; and vice versa.
Decided November 22, 1916.
Certiorari; from Fulton superior c'ourt—Judge Bell. March 18, 1916. .
Nalley & Scott, for Colclough. G. N. Bynum, contra.

Opinion:
Wade, C. J.
1. The judge of the superior court did not err in sustaining the certiorari. Waiving the question as to the authority of a judge of the municipal court of Atlanta to set aside a default judgment in that court after the expiration of the trial term, it appears from the record that the matters urged by the defendant in that court as a sufficient reason for setting aside the judgment against him were matters of defense which could have been presented'by plea in bar of such judgment. It does not appear that there was a sufficient legal excuse for the failure to interpose these defenses. Where failure to file a defense was due to the gross negligence of the defendant or of his counsel, it is not error to refuse to set aside a default judgment and reinstate a case, even though motion be made at the same term. Athens Leather Manufacturing Co. v. Myers, 98 Ga. 396, 397 (25 S. E. 503). Neither is the failure of a defendant to appear and' plead on account of an apparent misunderstanding between himself and his counsel, whereby no appearance whatever was entered, a sufficient ground for setting aside a default judgment. Moore v. Kelly & Jones Co., 109 Ga. 798 (35 S. E. 168).
2. Since the ruling of the judge of the superior court sustaining the certiorari in this case must finally govern the disposition of the case in the municipal court, and there was no question of fact that would make it necessary to send the case back for a new hearing in that court, the judge erred in net making a final decision in the case, instead of sending it back to that court. Civil Code, § 5201.
Judgment on the main hill of exceptions affirmed,- on cross-hill reversed.