Case Name: James L. Lusk, Respondent, v. Arthur R. Peck, Appellant, Impleaded with Another
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1910-09-27
Citations: 199 N.Y. 546
Docket Number: 
Parties: James L. Lusk, Respondent, v. Arthur R. Peck, Appellant, Impleaded with Another.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 199
Pages: 546–546

Head Matter:
James L. Lusk, Respondent, v. Arthur R. Peck, Appellant, Impleaded with Another.
Lusk v. Peck, 132 App. Div. 426, affirmed.
(Argued June 14, 1910;
decided September 27, 1910.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered May 8, 190.9, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained through defendant’s negligence.
Charles P. Ryan for appellant.
Stewart F. Hancock for respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Geay, Haight and Chase, JJ. Dissenting: Yann and Willard Bartlett, JJ. Taking no part: Hiscook, J.