Case Name: CREDIT ALLIANCE CORPORATION v. VITOR DELLENOCI et al.
Court: Supreme Court of the District of Columbia
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Decision Date: 1933
Citations: 1 S.C.D.C. (N.S.) 99
Docket Number: Equity No. 55471
Parties: CREDIT ALLIANCE CORPORATION v. VITOR DELLENOCI et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Supreme Court of the District of Columbia Reports
Volume: 1
Pages: 99–100

Head Matter:
CREDIT ALLIANCE CORPORATION v. VITOR DELLENOCI et al.
Equity No. 55471
Albert E. Steinem for plaintiff.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PROCTOR, J.
On Motion for Receiver:
Although there is no appearance or opposition by or on the behalf of the sole defendant, the bill shows that others holding prior liens have an interest in the property, which of course makes the appointment of a receiver and sale of the property a matter of concern to them. They should be made parties. The bill fails to show any value to the property above such prior liens. For these reasons the motion for a receiver is denied, but without prejudice to renew the same if the bill is reformed to overcome the foregoing deficiencies.