Case Name: The State ex rel. Duncan, Appellant, v. DeWeese, Judge, Appellee
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2012-08-30
Citations: 132 Ohio St. 3d 525
Docket Number: No. 2012-0904
Parties: The State ex rel. Duncan, Appellant, v. DeWeese, Judge, Appellee.
Judges: O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 132
Pages: 525–526

Head Matter:
The State ex rel. Duncan, Appellant, v. DeWeese, Judge, Appellee.
[Cite as State ex rel. Duncan v. DeWeese, 132 Ohio St.3d 525, 2012-Ohio-3835.]
(No. 2012-0904
Submitted August 22, 2012
Decided August 30, 2012.)

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, Roy Duncan, for a writ of mandamus to compel appellee, Richland County Common Pleas Court Judge James DeWeese, to issue a new sentencing entry. Duncan asserts that his current sentencing entry is not a final, appealable order.
{¶ 2} Contrary to Duncan's assertion, to be final and appealable, the sentencing entry did not need to contain a disposition concerning specifications that Duncan was charged with but was not convicted of. See State ex rel. Rose v. McGinty, 128 Ohio St.3d 371, 2011-Ohio-761, 944 N.E.2d 672, ¶ 3; State ex rel. Davis v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 127 Ohio St.3d 29, 2010-Ohio-4728, 936 N.E.2d 41, ¶ 2.
Roy Duncan, pro se.
James J. Mayer Jr., Richland County Prosecuting Attorney, and Jill M. Cochran, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for respondent.
{¶ 3} The December 8, 2009 sentencing entry for Duncan fully complies with Crim.R. 32(C) and R.C. 2505.02 because it states that he was convicted by a jury of specified crimes, it sets forth the sentence, it is signed by the judge, and it was entered upon the journal by the clerk of court. Rose at ¶ 2.
{¶ 4} Therefore, Duncan is not entitled to the requested extraordinary relief in mandamus to compel Judge DeWeese to enter a new sentencing entry.
Judgment affirmed.
O'Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.
. The entry orders Duncan to "pay restitution for medical expenses to Kathy Ward, Richard Miller, or providers." In a subsequent entry denying Duncan's motion for resentencing, the court stated that Duncan owed no monetary restitution. The entries thus resolved any issue concerning restitution.