Case Name: Abdul AZIZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE STATE COLLEGE SYSTEM OF WEST VIRGINIA, Defendant-Appellee, and Bluefield State College, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-05-01
Citations: 33 F. App'x 143
Docket Number: No. 01-2123
Parties: Abdul AZIZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE STATE COLLEGE SYSTEM OF WEST VIRGINIA, Defendant-Appellee, and Bluefield State College, Defendant.
Judges: Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 33
Pages: 143–143

Head Matter:
Abdul AZIZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE STATE COLLEGE SYSTEM OF WEST VIRGINIA, Defendant-Appellee, and Bluefield State College, Defendant.
No. 01-2123.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 25, 2002.
Decided May 1, 2002.
Abdul Aziz, Appellant Pro Se. Charles R. Bailey, Bailey & Wyant, P.L.L.C., Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Abdul Aziz appeals the district court's denial of a post judgment motion filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). The district court originally dismissed the action on its merits, and we affirmed. Aziz v. Board of Directors, No. 99-1502, 1999 WL 734763 (4th Cir. Sept.21, 1999) (unpublished), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1004, 120 S. Ct. 1268, 146 L.Ed.2d 218 (2000).
We review denial of a Rule 60(b) motion for abuse of discretion. Eberhardt v. Integrated Design & Constr., Inc., 167 F.3d 861, 869 (4th Cir.1999). Having reviewed the district court's order denying the motion, we conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying the requested relief. Therefore, we deny Appellee's motion to dismiss the appeal, deny Appellant's motion for jury trial, and affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.