Case Name: Gloria C. PAYNE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-05-23
Citations: 562 So. 2d 372
Docket Number: No. 89-0975
Parties: Gloria C. PAYNE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: GLICKSTEIN, J., concurs.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 562
Pages: 372–374

Head Matter:
Gloria C. PAYNE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 89-0975.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
May 23, 1990.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Marcy K. Allen, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Deborah Guller, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant raises two points. As to the first point, we reverse and remand for a new trial because of the absence of proof of the confidential informant's consent to the taped conversation. See State v. Welker, 536 So.2d 1017 (Fla.1988). We find no merit to appellant's second point; namely, her attack upon the information.
GLICKSTEIN, J., concurs.
DELL, J., concurs specially with opinion.
GARRETT, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with opinion.