Case Name: Nanette HISLOP, a single woman; on her own behalf and on behalf of her minor sons, Adam, Jacob and James Hislop, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT AND POWER DISTRICT, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona; Dycom Industries, Inc., a corporation doing business in Arizona; S.T.S., Inc., a corporation doing business in Arizona, Defendants-Appellees; Michael McLaurin and Debra McLaurin, husband and wife; on their own behalf, and on behalf of their minor daughters, Latasha, Carrie, Michelle and Sherry McLaurin, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona; Dycom Industries, Inc., a corporation doing business in Arizona; S.T.S., Inc., a corporation doing business in Arizona, Defendants-Appellees
Court: Arizona Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Arizona
Decision Date: 2001-01-23
Citations: 199 Ariz. 431
Docket Number: No. CV-00-0200-PR
Parties: Nanette HISLOP, a single woman; on her own behalf and on behalf of her minor sons, Adam, Jacob and James Hislop, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT AND POWER DISTRICT, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona; Dycom Industries, Inc., a corporation doing business in Arizona; S.T.S., Inc., a corporation doing business in Arizona, Defendants-Appellees. Michael McLaurin and Debra McLaurin, husband and wife; on their own behalf, and on behalf of their minor daughters, Latasha, Carrie, Michelle and Sherry McLaurin, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona; Dycom Industries, Inc ., a corporation doing business in Arizona; S.T.S., Inc., a corporation doing business in Arizona, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Arizona Reports
Volume: 199
Pages: 431–432

Head Matter:
18 P.3d 1230
Nanette HISLOP, a single woman; on her own behalf and on behalf of her minor sons, Adam, Jacob and James Hislop, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT AND POWER DISTRICT, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona; Dycom Industries, Inc., a corporation doing business in Arizona; S.T.S., Inc., a corporation doing business in Arizona, Defendants-Appellees. Michael McLaurin and Debra McLaurin, husband and wife; on their own behalf, and on behalf of their minor daughters, Latasha, Carrie, Michelle and Sherry McLaurin, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona; Dycom Industries, Inc ., a corporation doing business in Arizona; S.T.S., Inc., a corporation doing business in Arizona, Defendants-Appellees.
No. CV-00-0200-PR.
Supreme Court of Arizona.
Jan. 23, 2001.

Opinion:
AMENDED ORDER
MCGREGOR, Duty Justice.
After hearing oral argument and considering further the pleadings filed, it appears to a majority of the Court that the grant of review in this case was improvident. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the order granting review is vacated.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Review is denied.
Chief Justice Zlaket and Justice Feldman dissent from that part of this order which vacates review as improvident and denies the petition for review.