Case Name: PITTSBURGH PARTNERS, LIMITED, etc., et al., Appellants, v. ACCURATE CASH REGISTER, INC., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1982-04-06
Citations: 412 So. 2d 46
Docket Number: No. 81-2545
Parties: PITTSBURGH PARTNERS, LIMITED, etc., et al., Appellants, v. ACCURATE CASH REGISTER, INC., Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ and NESBITT, JJ., and PEARSON, TILLMAN (Ret.), Associate Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 412
Pages: 46–47

Head Matter:
PITTSBURGH PARTNERS, LIMITED, etc., et al., Appellants, v. ACCURATE CASH REGISTER, INC., Appellee.
No. 81-2545.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 6, 1982.
Burt E. Redlus, Alfred Bieley, Miami, for appellants.
Before SCHWARTZ and NESBITT, JJ., and PEARSON, TILLMAN (Ret.), Associate Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The default order under review was erroneously entered after an answer had been filed and is consequently reversed. Fla.R. Civ.P. 1.500(c); Board of Regents v. Hardin, 393 So.2d 1134 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Chester, Blackburn & Roder, Inc. v. Marchese, 383 So.2d 734 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Freedman v. Freedman, 235 So.2d 544 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970), cert. denied, 241 So.2d 859 (Fla.1970).
. Pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.130(a)(3)(C)(iv). See Doctor's Hospital of Hollywood, Inc. v. Madison, 411 So.2d 190 (Fla.1982).