Case Name: THE SAFE DEPOSIT AND TRUST COMPANY OF BALTIMORE, Trustee, vs. THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE et al.
Court: Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jurisdiction: Maryland
Decision Date: 1919-06-25
Citations: 135 Md. 54
Docket Number: 
Parties: THE SAFE DEPOSIT AND TRUST COMPANY OF BALTIMORE, Trustee, vs. THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE et al.
Judges: The cause was argued, together with that next preceding, before Boyd, C. J., Briscoe, Burke, Thomas, Pattisoet, Ureter, Stookbridge, and Adkiets, JJ.
Reporter: Maryland Reports
Volume: 135
Pages: 54–55

Head Matter:
THE SAFE DEPOSIT AND TRUST COMPANY OF BALTIMORE, Trustee, vs. THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE et al.
Motion to Dismiss Appeal.
Where the court below properly refused to grant the relief prayed by the appellant, held its order to that extent should be affirmed, and a motion to dismiss the appeal overruled, without determining whether there was a right of appeal. p. 55
Decided June 25th, 1919.
Appeal from the City Court of Baltimore Oity (Ambler, J.).
The cause was argued, together with that next preceding, before Boyd, C. J., Briscoe, Burke, Thomas, Pattisoet, Ureter, Stookbridge, and Adkiets, JJ.
Sylvan Hayes Laucheimer and Gharries McHenry Howard, with whom was Joseph S. Goldsmith on the brief, for the Safe Deposit and Trust Co.
S. S. Field, City Solicitor, for the Mayor and Oity Council.

Opinion:
Thomas, J.,
delivered the opinion of the Court.
We have said in No. 35 Appeals, for the reasons therein stated, that the Court below had no jurisdiction to grant the relief prayed in the petition of the Maryland Trust. Company. For the same reason the Court below had no authority to entertain the petition of the appellant in this case.
The appellee has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal on the ground that the Safe Deposit and Trust Company of' Baltimore had no right to intervene in the case of the Maryland Trust Company in the Court below, and "was no party to the appeal of the- Maryland Trust Company." But as the Court below, for the reasons we have stated, properly refused to grant the relief prayed by the appellant in this ease^ its. order will, to that extent, be affirmed, and the motion to dismiss the appeal will be overruled, without determining whether the appellant had a right to appeal.
Order of Court below, to the extent that it denied, the relief prayed in the petition of the appellant, affirmed, with costs,, and petition of the appellant dismissed..
Ante, p. 36.