Case Name: The California Company v. United States
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1960-07-07
Citations: 45 Cust. Ct. 422
Docket Number: Reap. Dec. 9737; Entry No. 4813
Parties: The California Company v. United States
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Volume: 45
Pages: 422–423

Head Matter:
(Reap. Dec. 9737)
The California Company v. United States
Entry No. 4813.
(Decided July 7, 1960)
Sharretts, Paley & Carter for the plaintiff.
George CoohranDoul), Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Opinion:
Rao, Judge:
This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the parties hereto that the merchandise consists of seamless steel oil well casing exported from England on or about October 30, 1958.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the export value for such merchandise, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the appraised values less 2%% discount net packed and that such merchandise is not described on the final list of products (T.D. 54521) which are not subject to the amended provisions.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this appeal for re-appraisement be submitted on this stipulation.
On the agreed facts, I find export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved and that such values were the appraised values, less 2% per centum discount, net, packed.
Judgment will be entered accordingly.