Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Denis Arnulfo SORTO-ORTIZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-05-10
Citations: 470 F. App'x 853
Docket Number: No. 11-14623
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Denis Arnulfo SORTO-ORTIZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 470
Pages: 853–853

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Denis Arnulfo SORTO-ORTIZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-14623
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
May 10, 2012.
Susan Hollis Rothstein-Youakim, Donald L. Hansen, Robert E. O’Neill, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Mary A. Mills, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Tampa, FL, Rosemary Cakmis, Donna Lee Elm, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Orlando, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Mary A. Mills, appointed counsel for Denis Arnulfo Sorto-Ortiz in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Sorto-Ortiz's convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.