Case Name: Starsha M. SEWELL, M.Ed, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-01-24
Citations: 709 F. App'x 231
Docket Number: No. 17-2083
Parties: Starsha M. SEWELL, M.Ed, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 709
Pages: 231–232

Head Matter:
Starsha M. SEWELL, M.Ed, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 17-2083
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: January 22, 2018
Decided: January 24, 2018
Starsha Sewell, Appellant Pro Se. Molis-sa Heather Farber, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland; Joel William Ruderman, PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Starsha M. Sewell appeals the district court's orders dismissing this action alleging employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012), and denying Sewell's motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n, No. 8:16-cv-02457-PX, 2017 WL 1196614 (D. Md. Mar. 31, 2017; Sept. 12, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED