Case Name: Jeffrey Miller & another vs. Darryl Fickett & others
Court: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Jurisdiction: Massachusetts
Decision Date: 2000-11-21
Citations: 432 Mass. 1028
Docket Number: 
Parties: Jeffrey Miller & another vs. Darryl Fickett & others.
Judges: 
Reporter: Massachusetts Reports
Volume: 432
Pages: 1028–1028

Head Matter:
Jeffrey Miller & another vs. Darryl Fickett & others.
November 21, 2000.
William McElligott for the plaintiffs.
Clyde K. Hanyen for Remax New Horizons & another.
Dorothy Miller, individually and as mother and next friend of Rachel Miller.
Kathleen Fickett, Remax New Horizons, Suanne DeFrancesco, and Denise Eason. Summary judgment in favor of Darryl and Kathleen Fickett was affirmed by the Appeals Court in an unpublished memorandum and order entered pursuant to its rule 1:28, Miller v. Fickett, 48 Mass. App. Ct. 1122 (2000), and the plaintiffs’ application for further appellate review was denied, 431 Mass. 1105 (2000).

Opinion:
A judge in the Superior Court entered summary judgment against the plaintiffs and in favor of the defendants Remax New Horizons and Suanne DeFrancesco (defendants). The Appeals Court affirmed the judgment, holding that the defendants did not breach any duty to the plaintiffs. Miller v. Fickett, 48 Mass. App. Ct. 654 (2000). We granted the plaintiffs' application for further appellate review.
For the reasons stated in the opinion of the Appeals Court, we affirm the judgment of the Superior Court.
So ordered.