Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. John Patrick George HASLAM, III, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1971-01-05
Citations: 436 F.2d 419
Docket Number: No. 25442
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. John Patrick George HASLAM, III, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 436
Pages: 419–419

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. John Patrick George HASLAM, III, Appellant.
No. 25442.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Jan. 5, 1971.
David K. Yamakawa, Jr. (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.
Alan H. Friedman (argued), Asst. U. S. Atty., Robert L. Meyer, David R. Nissen, Chief, Criminal Division, George G. Rayborn, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los An-geles, Cal., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS and MERRILL, Circuit Judges, and CONTI, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of conviction in this Dyer Act case is affirmed.
Qn the particular record here we find no error in denying a subpoena of a distant witness, in denying a subpoena for telephone company records in Florida, or in denying the appointment of an investigator. We find the Miranda (Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694) point without merit. See United States v. Hilliker, 9 Cir., 436 F.2d 101, decided December 11, 1970.
Other points not here mentioned we find without merit.