Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sergio MARTINEZ-FLORES, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-03-31
Citations: 320 F. App'x 741
Docket Number: No. 08-10297
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sergio MARTINEZ-FLORES, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 320
Pages: 741–741

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sergio MARTINEZ-FLORES, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-10297.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 18, 2009.
Filed March 31, 2009.
Robert A. Bork, Esquire, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Rene Valladares, Esquire, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Sergio Martinez-Flores appeals from the 46-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found unlawfully in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Martinez-Flores contends that the sentence is unreasonable because the district court failed to properly weigh some of the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) and improperly imposed a sentence within the applicable Sentencing Guidelines range. These contentions fail. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 128 S.Ct. 586, 600-02, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); see also United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 260-63, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.