Case Name: VIRGINIA M. FARR v. THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF ROCKY MOUNT, NORTH CAROLINA
Court: North Carolina Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 1986-03-18
Citations: 79 N.C. App. 754
Docket Number: No. 847SC10
Parties: VIRGINIA M. FARR v. THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF ROCKY MOUNT, NORTH CAROLINA
Judges: Judge BECTON concurs.
Reporter: North Carolina Court of Appeals Reports
Volume: 79
Pages: 754–754

Head Matter:
VIRGINIA M. FARR v. THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF ROCKY MOUNT, NORTH CAROLINA
No. 847SC10
(Filed 18 March 1986)
On remand from the North Carolina Supreme Court by their decision herein reported in 315 N.C. 309, 337 S.E. 2d 581 (1985).
Fitch and Butterfield, by G. K. Butterfield, Jr., for petitioner appellant.
Dill, Exum, Fountain & Hoyle, by William S. Hoyle, for respondent appellee.

Opinion:
PHILLIPS, Judge.
As directed by the above decision, we have given further consideration to the contentions made by the appellant in this Court that were not discussed in the decision reported in 73 N.C. App. 228, 326 S.E. 2d 382 (1985) and are of the opinion that those contentions are without merit and should be overruled. But even if the zoning ordinance in question applies to the case, and the record as we read it does not show that it was enacted before the prior property owner built the building involved, we are still of the opinion that the ordinance is unconstitutional for the reasons stated in our prior decision and that the judgment appealed from should be vacated.
Vacated.
Judge BECTON concurs.
Chief Judge Hedrick dissents.