Case Name: Bernard J. Ludwig, et al., Resp'ts, v. Rolland E. Gove, App'lt
Court: New York City Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1895-10-29
Citations: 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 449
Docket Number: 
Parties: Bernard J. Ludwig, et al., Resp’ts, v. Rolland E. Gove, App’lt.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 70
Pages: 449–449

Head Matter:
Bernard J. Ludwig, et al., Resp’ts, v. Rolland E. Gove, App’lt.
(New York City Court, General Term,
Filed October 29, 1895.)
Appeal—Order sustaining demurrer.
An order, sustaining a demurrer with leave to amend, is not appealable.
Appeal from an order, sustaining a demurrer to the answer with leave to amend. 4
Fellowes & Wright, for app’lt; Wager & AcTcer, for resp’t.

Opinion:
Fitzsmons,- J.
The plaintiffs demurred to the defendant's answer. The demurrer was sustained, with leave to the defendant to amend his answer. An order to that effect was entered. From such order this appeal is taken. The appeal must be dismissed, because from the order entered herein no appeal lies. Denslow v. Bush, 9 Misc. Rep. 337; 60 St. Rep. 608.
Appeal dismissed, with costs.