Case Name: Rosemary SERAFINO, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1988-11-22
Citations: 533 So. 2d 938
Docket Number: No. 88-479
Parties: Rosemary SERAFINO, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 533
Pages: 938–938

Head Matter:
Rosemary SERAFINO, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING, Appellee.
No. 88-479.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 22, 1988.
Whitelock and Moldof and Charles T. Whitelock, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
Karen A. Brodeen, Tallahassee, for ap-pellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Upon the joint stipulation of the parties, the order of January 24, 1988, is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the appellee for a new administrative hearing.