Case Name: Byron C. BRIGGS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee, and Raymond P. Lacey, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-11-12
Citations: 622 F. App'x 237
Docket Number: No. 15-1317
Parties: Byron C. BRIGGS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee, and Raymond P. Lacey, Defendant.
Judges: Before KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 622
Pages: 237–237

Head Matter:
Byron C. BRIGGS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee, and Raymond P. Lacey, Defendant.
No. 15-1317.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 29, 2015.
Decided: Nov. 12, 2015.
Bikash Roy, Cary, North Carolina, for Appellant. Thomas G. Walker, United States Attorney, Jennifer P. May-Parker, G. Norman Acker, III, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Byron C. Briggs appeals the district court's orders denying his motion to set aside the Government's scope-of-employment certification, see 28 U.S.C. § 2679(b)(1), (d)(1) (2012), and granting the Government's motion to dismiss his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Briggs v. United States, No. 5:13-cv-00844-BR, 2015 WL 72123 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 6, 2015; Feb. 2, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.