Case Name: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES; and Charles H. Bronson, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Petitioners, v. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2001-07-20
Citations: 790 So. 2d 559
Docket Number: No. 3D01-1682
Parties: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES; and Charles H. Bronson, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Petitioners, v. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and GREEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 790
Pages: 559–560

Head Matter:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES; and Charles H. Bronson, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Petitioners, v. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Respondent.
No. 3D01-1682.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 20, 2001.
Adorno & Zeder and Raoul G. Cantero, III and Wesley R. Parsons and Jack R. Reiter, Miami, for petitioners.
Robert Ginsburg, Miami-Dade County Attorney and Robert A. Duvall, Assistant Miami-Dade County Attorney; Earl G. Gallop, for respondent,
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and GREEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Without consideration of the merits of the order purportedly under review, cer-tiorari is granted and the order is vacated. See Florida Department of Agriculture v. Miami-Dade County, 790 So.2d 555 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).
SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GREEN, J., concur.