Case Name: In the Matter of Stanley M. Klebanoff, an Attorney, Appelant. Co-Ordinating Committee on Discipline of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York, the New York County Lawyers' Association and the Bronx County Bar Association, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1968-04-04
Citations: 21 N.Y.2d 920
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Stanley M. Klebanoff, an Attorney, Appelant. Co-Ordinating Committee on Discipline of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York, the New York County Lawyers’ Association and the Bronx County Bar Association, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 21
Pages: 920–921

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Stanley M. Klebanoff, an Attorney, Appelant. Co-Ordinating Committee on Discipline of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York, the New York County Lawyers’ Association and the Bronx County Bar Association, Respondent.
Argued February 27, 1968;
decided April 4, 1968.
Henry G. McDonough for appellant.
Angelo T. Cometa and Barbara A. Lee for respondent.

Opinion:
Order affirmed, without costs. (See Matter of Zuckerman, 20 N Y 2d 430, cert. den. 390 U. S. 925, decided Jan. 29, 1968.)
Concur: Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Keating, Breitel, and Jasen. Chief Judge Full concurs in the following memorandum: Despite the views which I expressed in dissent in Matter of Zuckerman (20 N Y 2d 430, 439), to which I still subscribe, I feel constrained by the court's decision in that case and, accordingly, concur for affirmance.