Case Name: Mary P. HALL and L. D. Hall, her husband, Appellants, v. Rosie FORD and William Hines, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1967-10-03
Citations: 202 So. 2d 781
Docket Number: No. 66-1082
Parties: Mary P. HALL and L. D. Hall, her husband, Appellants, v. Rosie FORD and William Hines, Appellees.
Judges: Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and PEARSON and BARKDULL, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 202
Pages: 781–781

Head Matter:
Mary P. HALL and L. D. Hall, her husband, Appellants, v. Rosie FORD and William Hines, Appellees.
No. 66-1082.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
Oct. 3, 1967.
Kelnér & Lewis, Miami,, for appellants.
Walton, Lantaff, Schroeder, Carson & Wahl, Miami, for appellees.
Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and PEARSON and BARKDULL, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed upon the authority of the rule stated in Cloud v. Fallis, Fla. 1959, 110 So. 2d 669; Leavstrom v. Muston, Fla.App. 1960, 119 So.2d 315. See Eggers v. Phillips Hardware Company, Fla.1956, 88 So.2d 507.