Case Name: Cox et al., Appellants and Cross-Appellees, v. Stolle Corporation, Appellee and Cross-Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1991-08-27
Citations: 61 Ohio St. 3d 683
Docket Number: No. 90-2264
Parties: Cox et al., Appellants and Cross-Appellees, v. Stolle Corporation, Appellee and Cross-Appellant.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Douglas, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 61
Pages: 683–684

Head Matter:
Cox et al., Appellants and Cross-Appellees, v. Stolle Corporation, Appellee and Cross-Appellant.
[Cite as Cox v. Stolle Corp. (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 683.]
(No. 90-2264
Submitted July 31, 1991
Decided August 27, 1991.)
McCarthy, Palmer, Volkema & Becker, Dennis M. McCarthy and William C. Becker; Hochman & Roach and James B. Hochman, for appellants and cross-appellees.
William H. Anderson and John C. Greiner, for appellee and cross-appellant.

Opinion:
The judgment of the court of appeals dismissing on the jurisdictional issue (see [1990], 56 Ohio App.3d 79, 564 N.E.2d 1135) is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court; the judgment of the court of appeals on the constitutional issue is affirmed for the reasons stated in Brady v. Safety-Kleen Corp. (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 624, 576 N.E.2d 722.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Douglas, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Holmes and Wright, JJ., dissent.