Case Name: Alexander Koral, Respondent, v. Savory, Inc., Donald F. Killorin, Appellants, and Others, Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1938-11-04
Citations: 255 A.D. 856
Docket Number: 
Parties: Alexander Koral, Respondent, v. Savory, Inc., Donald F. Killorin, Appellants, and Others, Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 255
Pages: 856–857

Head Matter:
Alexander Koral, Respondent, v. Savory, Inc., Donald F. Killorin, Appellants, and Others, Defendants.

Opinion:
Action to recover damages (1) for malicious prosecution of a bankruptcy proceeding, and (2) for conspiracy. The Special Term, on motion of defendants Savory, Inc., and Killorin, dismissed the first cause of action for damages for malicious prosecution upon the ground that facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action were not stated therein, but denied their motion in that phase which contemplated the striking from the second cause of action allegations of fact imported by reference into it from the first cause of action. From so much of an order as denied their motion thus to strike out, those defendants appeal. Order so far as appealed from, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur. [168 Misc. 615.]