Case Name: Eleanor BUSH, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. William H. FRIEDMAN, and William H. Friedman & Associates, Inc., Defendants/Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-07-21
Citations: 971 S.W.2d 366
Docket Number: No. 71962
Parties: Eleanor BUSH, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. William H. FRIEDMAN, and William H. Friedman & Associates, Inc., Defendants/Respondents.
Judges: Before GRIMM, P. J., and PUDLOWSKI and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 971
Pages: 366–366

Head Matter:
Eleanor BUSH, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. William H. FRIEDMAN, and William H. Friedman & Associates, Inc., Defendants/Respondents.
No. 71962.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
July 21, 1998.
James A. Stemmier, St. Louis, for plaintiff/appellant.
Jacobson, Maynard & Tuschman, J. Thaddeus Eekenrode, St. Louis, for defendants/respondents.
Before GRIMM, P. J., and PUDLOWSKI and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant appeals a jury verdict claiming the trial court erred: a) in denying appellant's request for discovery; b) in abusing its discretion in denying testimony of a witness and c) in sustaining the respondent's objections in cross-examination of respondent's expert witness.
We have read the briefs, reviewed the legal file and transcripts. We find no error of law and no jurisprudential purpose will be served by an extended written opinion. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).