Case Name: SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT v. J. N. GILLETT et al.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1937-04-05
Citations: 89 F.2d 1018
Docket Number: No. 8404
Parties: SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT v. J. N. GILLETT et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 89
Pages: 1018–1018

Head Matter:
SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT v. J. N. GILLETT et al.
No. 8404.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
April 5, 1937.
Nutter & Rutherford, Philip Cavalero, and Stephen Dietrich, all of Stockton, Cal., for appellant.
Gillett & Gillett, of Oakland, Cal., Clark, Nichols & Eltse, of Berkeley, Cal., Hugo D. Newhouse, Russell P. Tyler, Peter turn Suden, Richard turn Suden, and Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, all of San Francisco, Cal., and W. Coburn Cook, of Turlock, Cal., for appellees.
Before WILBUR, GARRECHT, and MATHEWS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of motion of appel-lees to advance cause for hearing, etc., and oral presentation of motion by counsel for opposing parties, ordered motion granted, that a decree of affirmance be filed and entered accordingly, and the mandate of this court issue as provided in rule 32.