Case Name: HAROLD H. GRIFFIN and CLARICE D. GRIFFIN, Defendants and Appellants v. COY J. BROWN, Plaintiff and Respondent
Court: Montana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Montana
Decision Date: 1967-02-10
Citations: 149 Mont. 535
Docket Number: No. 11285
Parties: HAROLD H. GRIFFIN and CLARICE D. GRIFFIN, Defendants and Appellants v. COY J. BROWN, Plaintiff and Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Montana Reports
Volume: 149
Pages: 535–535

Head Matter:
HAROLD H. GRIFFIN and CLARICE D. GRIFFIN, Defendants and Appellants v. COY J. BROWN, Plaintiff and Respondent.
No. 11285.
Decided February 10, 1967.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appellants have filed herein Motion for Stay of Execution of Judgment and Stay of Writ of Possession; Respondent has filed an affidavit in objection thereto and counsel for both parties were heard in oral argument.
It appears that appellant made a similar Motion in the district court and was advised that the Motion would be denied. It appears to this court that to stay execution of the judgment will require further proceedings in the district court on remand to determine what, if any, further damages have resulted by reason of the stay. This being our view we are not disposed to grant the Motion.
Therefore IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Stay of Execution of Judgment and Stay of Writ of Possession be and it hereby is, denied.