Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Martin Avery HUGHES, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-03-29
Citations: 516 F. App'x 238
Docket Number: No. 13-6171
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Martin Avery HUGHES, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before DUNCAN, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 516
Pages: 238–238

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Martin Avery HUGHES, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-6171.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 26, 2013.
Decided: March 29, 2013.
Martin Avery Hughes, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer R. Bockhorst, Assistant United States Attorney, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before DUNCAN, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Martin Avery Hughes appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hughes, No. 1:08-cr-00024-JPJ-35 (W.D.Va. Jan. 24, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.