Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Isnardo ZUNIGA-RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-02-17
Citations: 635 F. App'x 145
Docket Number: No. 15-40985
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Isnardo ZUNIGA-RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before DAVIS, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 635
Pages: 145–146

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Isnardo ZUNIGA-RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-40985
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Feb. 17, 2016.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Timothy William Crooks, Philip G. Gallagher, Assistant Federal Public Defenders, Evan Gray Howze, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before DAVIS, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Jose Isnardo Zunigar-Ramirez raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Martinez-Lugo, 782 F.3d 198, 204-05 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 186 S.Ct. 533, 193 L.Ed.2d 426 (2015). In Martinez-Lugo, 782 F.3d at 204-05, we held that an enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(i) for a prior felony conviction of a drug trafficking offense is warranted regardless of whether the prior conviction required proof of remuneration or commercial activity. Accordingly, the motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED,
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5m Cm, R. 47,5.4.