Case Name: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Robert A. SESSION, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1987-07-09
Citations: 509 So. 2d 923
Docket Number: No. 69769
Parties: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Robert A. SESSION, Respondent.
Judges: McDonald, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 509
Pages: 923–923

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Robert A. SESSION, Respondent.
No. 69769.
Supreme Court of Florida.
July 9, 1987.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Kevin Kitpatrick Carson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for petitioner.
Robert A. Session, in pro. per.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We review Session v. State, 497 So.2d 930 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986), to answer the certified question of whether retroactive application of the penalty provisions of section 27.3455, Florida Statutes (1985), violates the ex post facto provisions of the United States and Florida Constitutions. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We answer in the affirmative and approve the decision below on the authority of State v. Yost, 507 So.2d 1099 (Fla.1987).
It is so ordered.
McDonald, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.