Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gregory ISLAND, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-11-24
Citations: 301 F. App'x 683
Docket Number: No. 08-50023
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gregory ISLAND, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 301
Pages: 683–683

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gregory ISLAND, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-50023.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 13, 2008.
Filed Nov. 24, 2008.
Joel A. Thvedt, Michael J. Raphael, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Errol H. Stambler, Attorney at Law, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Gregory Island appeals from the district court's order revoking his supervised release and imposing an 18-month sentence. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Island contends that the district court erred by declining to apply the exclusionary rule at his supervised release revocation proceeding. This contention lacks merit. See United States v. Hebert, 201 F.3d 1103, 1104 (9th Cir.2000) (per curiam); see also United States v. DiazRosas, 13 F.3d 1305, 1307 (9th Cir.1994) (per curiam).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.