Case Name: NATHAN SCHWARTZ, Petitioner, v. MUNICIPAL COURT OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, etc., et al., Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1930-02-21
Citations: 209 Cal. 779
Docket Number: S. F. No. 13706
Parties: NATHAN SCHWARTZ, Petitioner, v. MUNICIPAL COURT OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, etc., et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Reports
Volume: 209
Pages: 779–780

Head Matter:
[S. F. No. 13706.
In Bank.
February 21, 1930.]
NATHAN SCHWARTZ, Petitioner, v. MUNICIPAL COURT OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, etc., et al., Respondents.
Henry Haves and W. L. Engelhardt for Petitioner.
Lloyd S. Nix, City Prosecutor, and Joe W. Matherly and F. W. Fellows, Deputies City Prosecutor, for Respondents.

Opinion:
THE COURT.
— Upon the authority of Hansen v. Municipal Court, 208 Cal. 506 [282 Pac. 384], and Keaton v. Municipal Court (L. A. No. 11849), ante, p. 52 [285 Pac. 696], this day decided, we are of the opinion that the peremptory writ, of mandate should be issued as prayed for, and it is so ordered.