Case Name: Mario Aurelio RAMIREZ-RAMIREZ, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-07-07
Citations: 375 F.3d 854
Docket Number: No. 02-73376
Parties: Mario Aurelio RAMIREZ-RAMIREZ, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: PREGERSON, BEEZER, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 375
Pages: 854–854

Head Matter:
Mario Aurelio RAMIREZ-RAMIREZ, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 02-73376.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Filed July 7, 2004.
Carlos A. Cruz, Law Offices of Carlos A. Cruz, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.
Regional Counsel, Laguna Niguel, CA, CAC-District Counsel, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, San Francisco, CA, OIL, Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: PREGERSON, BEEZER, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
A majority of the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judge Pregerson voted to grant the petition for rehearing en bane, Judge Tallman voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge Beezer so recommends.
The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
The mandate shall issue seven days after entry of this order in accordance with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 41(b).
The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED.