Case Name: Robert A. Puckett et al., Respondents, v. County of Erie et al., Respondents, and Donald J. Braasch Construction, Inc., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1997-11-19
Citations: 244 A.D.2d 865
Docket Number: Appeal No. 2
Parties: Robert A. Puckett et al., Respondents, v County of Erie et al., Respondents, and Donald J. Braasch Construction, Inc., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 244
Pages: 865–865

Head Matter:
Robert A. Puckett et al., Respondents, v County of Erie et al., Respondents, and Donald J. Braasch Construction, Inc., Appellant.
(Appeal No. 2.)
[665 NYS2d 236]

Opinion:
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied the motion of Donald J. Braasch Construction, Inc. (defendant), for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and cross claims on the ground that Robert A. Puckett (plaintiff) was a special employee of defendant. On the record before us, plaintiffs employment status at the time of the accident cannot be determined as a matter of law (see, Thompson v Grumman Aerospace Corp., 78 NY2d 553, 557-558). While plaintiff worked sporadically for defendant at the construction site pursuant to an informal agreement between his general employer and defendant, he also worked at the site for his general employer. Defendant has not shown "a clear demonstration of surrender of control by the general employer and assumption of control by the special employer" (Thompson v Grumman Aerospace Corp., supra, at 557). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Wisner, Balio and Fallon, JJ.