Case Name: David Harold CARR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J.R. HEAD, Lieutenant; Officer Wilson; Bradshaw, Officer, Defendants-Appellees, and John T. McDevitt, Sheriff; Bobby Lee English; David Pearson, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-11-19
Citations: 300 F. App'x 216
Docket Number: No. 08-6280
Parties: David Harold CARR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J.R. HEAD, Lieutenant; Officer Wilson; Bradshaw, Officer, Defendants-Appellees, and John T. McDevitt, Sheriff; Bobby Lee English; David Pearson, Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 300
Pages: 216–216

Head Matter:
David Harold CARR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J.R. HEAD, Lieutenant; Officer Wilson; Bradshaw, Officer, Defendants-Appellees, and John T. McDevitt, Sheriff; Bobby Lee English; David Pearson, Defendants.
No. 08-6280.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 31, 2008.
Decided: Nov. 19, 2008.
David Harold Carr, Appellant Pro Se. Sean Francis Perrin, Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
David Harold Carr appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Carr v. Head, No. 1:07-cv-00180-GCM, 2008 WL 305481 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 1, 2008). We deny Carr's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.