Case Name: Aaron DENMARK, Appellant, v. Harry K. SINGLETARY, Jr., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1999-01-06
Citations: 722 So. 2d 969
Docket Number: No. 98-0828
Parties: Aaron DENMARK, Appellant, v. Harry K. SINGLETARY, Jr., Appellee.
Judges: GUNTHER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 722
Pages: 969–970

Head Matter:
Aaron DENMARK, Appellant, v. Harry K. SINGLETARY, Jr., Appellee.
No. 98-0828.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jan. 6, 1999.
Aaron Denmark, Okeechobee, pro se.
MaryEllen McDonald, Assistant General Counsel, Tallahassee, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We accept appellant's position that his earlier gain time litigation did not concern challenges to forfeited gain time associated with Counts II and III and therefore was not barred by the doctrine of res judicata. Nevertheless, we affirm the trial court's order that dismissed appellant's mandamus petition as the record does not demonstrate the appellant exhausted his administrative remedies in connection with such claim. Our af-firmance is without prejudice for appellant to pursue this claim in the proper forum.
GUNTHER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.
POLEN, J., dissents without opinion.