Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos SCOVENS, a/k/a Lucky, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-04-24
Citations: 177 F. App'x 309
Docket Number: No. 05-4971
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Carlos SCOVENS, a/k/a Lucky, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before MICHAEL, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 177
Pages: 309–309

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Carlos SCOVENS, a/k/a Lucky, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 05-4971.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 20, 2006.
Decided: April 24, 2006.
Fred Warren Bennett, Gary E. Bair, Bennett & Bair, LLP, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J.' Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Philip S. Jackson, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before MICHAEL, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Carlos Scovens pled guilty to possession with intent to distribute cocaine base pursuant to a conditional guilty plea, reserving the right to challenge the denial of his motion to suppress. On appeal, he contends that the warrant was overbroad and was executed in an unconstitutional manner. We have reviewed the record and the parties' briefs on appeal, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its order denying Scovens' motion to suppress. See United States v. Scovens, No. CR-05-35-WDQ (D. Md. June 14, 2005; entered June 15, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.