Case Name: Coy PHELPS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-06-09
Citations: 184 F. App'x 630
Docket Number: No. 05-17277
Parties: Coy PHELPS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: CANBY, T.G. NELSON and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 184
Pages: 630–630

Head Matter:
Coy PHELPS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 05-17277.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 5, 2006.
Filed June 9, 2006.
Coy Phelps, Ayer, MA, pro se.
David M. Goldstein, Esq., Heller Ehrman, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: CANBY, T.G. NELSON and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
A review of the record and the opening brief indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, appellees' motion for summary affirmance of the district court's judgment is granted.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.