Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Freddie Burgess, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1993-07-16
Citations: 195 A.D.2d 1081
Docket Number: Appeal No. 1
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Freddie Burgess, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 195
Pages: 1081–1082

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Freddie Burgess, Appellant.
(Appeal No. 1.)
[601 NYS2d 899]

Opinion:
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The record reflects that, as part of his plea bargain, defendant made a voluntary, knowing and intelligent waiver of his right to appeal (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Moissett, 76 NY2d 909; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1). Defendant has raised no categories of appellate claims that survive his waiver (see, People v Callahan, supra, at 280; People v Bonner, 193 AD2d 1140; People v Akel, 192 AD2d 1135; People v Saunders, 190 AD2d 1092). In any event, were we to consider the merits of defendant's claim, we would find it to be lacking in merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Rossetti, J.—Robbery, 2nd Degree.) Present— Denman, P. J., Callahan, Boomer, Davis and Boehm, JJ.