Case Name: Cincinnati Bar Association v. Florez
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2003-12-18
Citations: 101 Ohio St. 3d 1207
Docket Number: No. 2002-2223
Parties: Cincinnati Bar Association v. Florez.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 101
Pages: 1207–1207

Head Matter:
Cincinnati Bar Association v. Florez.
[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Florez, 101 Ohio St.3d 1207, 2003-Ohio-7082.]
(No. 2002-2223
Submitted December 15, 2003
Decided December 18, 2003.)

Opinion:
{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Michael G. Florez, Attorney Registration No. 0010693, last known business address in Cincinnati, Ohio.
{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of April 16, 2003, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of six months, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,
{¶ 3} IT IS ORDERED by this court that respondent be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.
{¶ 4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.
{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Florez, 98 Ohio St.3d 448, 2003-Ohio-1730, 786 N.E.2d 875.
Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor and O'Donnell, JJ., concur.