Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Johnny WALTON, Defendant/Appellant; Johnny WALTON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1996-02-20
Citations: 916 S.W.2d 418
Docket Number: Nos. 65190, 67425
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Johnny WALTON, Defendant/Appellant. Johnny WALTON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and DOWD, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 916
Pages: 418–419

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Johnny WALTON, Defendant/Appellant. Johnny WALTON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Nos. 65190, 67425.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Feb. 20, 1996.
Lew Kolias, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., David R. Truman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and DOWD, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals after he was convicted by a jury of second degree robbery, § 569.030, RSMo 1986. The court sentenced him as a class X offender to a prison term of twenty-five years. Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post- conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).