Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Martin Michael FLORES, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-07-24
Citations: 235 F. App'x 229
Docket Number: No. 06-51424
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Martin Michael FLORES, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before DeMOSS, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 235
Pages: 229–230

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Martin Michael FLORES, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-51424
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
July 24, 2007.
Joseph H. Gay, Jr, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Lucien B. Campbell, Federal Public Defender, Henry Joseph Bemporad, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before DeMOSS, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Martin Michael Flores has appealed the sentence imposed following revocation of his term of supervised release. Flores argues that his 24-month sentence is unreasonable because it is above the advisory guideline range and the sentencing factors cited by the district court are taken into account by the Sentencing Guidelines.
The district court properly considered the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors when imposing Flores's sentence. See United States v. Gonzalez, 250 F.3d 923, 930 (5th Cir.2001). The sentence is neither unreasonable nor plainly unreasonable. See United States v. Hinson, 429 F.3d 114, 120 (5th Cir.2005), cert. denied, 547 U.S. 1083, 126 S.Ct. 1804, 164 L.Ed.2d 540 (2006).
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.