Case Name: FRANK LA SASSO, PROSECUTOR, v. ALEXANDER MacLEOD, JUDGE OF THE PASSAIC COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1948-03-17
Citations: 137 N.J.L. 45
Docket Number: 
Parties: FRANK LA SASSO, PROSECUTOR, v. ALEXANDER MacLEOD, JUDGE OF THE PASSAIC COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 137
Pages: 45–46

Head Matter:
FRANK LA SASSO, PROSECUTOR, v. ALEXANDER MacLEOD, JUDGE OF THE PASSAIC COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
Argued January 21, 1948
Decided March 17, 1948.
Before Justices Donges, Colie and Eastwood.
For the prosecutor, Isadore Rabinowitz.
For the defendants, Manfield G. Amlicke.

Opinion:
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Colie, J.
Prank La Sasso had a rule to show cause why a writ of certiorari should not issue to review an order of the Passaic County Court of Common Pleas. Upon the return of the'rule, the Supreme Court discharged the rule and its opinion is reported in 136 N. J. L. 345. Since the decision-in State v. Wood, 23 Id. 560, it has been settled that no appeal will lie from the refusal to allow a writ of certiorari. To the same effect: Daniel B. Frazier Co. v. Long Beach, 110 Id. 221.
The motion is denied, with costs.