Case Name: Jon BECK, Employee-Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Employer-Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-10-09
Citations: 58 S.W.3d 63
Docket Number: No. ED 79203
Parties: Jon BECK, Employee-Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Employer-Respondent.
Judges: Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, SR. and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 58
Pages: 63–63

Head Matter:
Jon BECK, Employee-Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Employer-Respondent.
No. ED 79203.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Oct. 9, 2001.
Rick Barry, Law Offices of Rick Barry, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Patricia A. Hageman, Edward J. Han-lon, Robert Lyng, City Counselor, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, SR. and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Jon Beck, (Employee), appeals from a final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission entered in favor of the City of St. Louis, (Employer), denying his claim for worker's compensation. Employee raises seven points on appeal, all of which assert claims of error concerning the weight and credibility given by the Commission to conflicting evidence in the case.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The Commission's decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record, and is not against the overwhelming weight of evidence. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the award pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).