Case Name: In the interest of B.E.D., J.N.D., J.R.D. and B.C.D., C.D. (Mother), Appellant, v. Juvenile Officer, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2013-01-02
Citations: 387 S.W.3d 452
Docket Number: No. WD 75071
Parties: In the interest of B.E.D., J.N.D., J.R.D. and B.C.D., C.D. (Mother), Appellant, v. Juvenile Officer, Respondent.
Judges: Before Division One: THOMAS H. NEWTON, Presiding Judge, JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge and GARY D. WITT, Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 387
Pages: 452–452

Head Matter:
In the interest of B.E.D., J.N.D., J.R.D. and B.C.D., C.D. (Mother), Appellant, v. Juvenile Officer, Respondent.
No. WD 75071.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jan. 2, 2013.
Steven E. Skinner, Maryville, MO, for appellant.
David A. Baird, Maryville, MO, for respondent.
Before Division One: THOMAS H. NEWTON, Presiding Judge, JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge and GARY D. WITT, Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
C.D. ("Mother") appeals the trial court's judgment terminating her parental rights. Mother contends that the court erred in that: (1) it did not make a specific finding, pursuant to section 211.447.7, that the termination of her parental rights was in the best interest of her children, and (2) the evidence would not support a finding that termination was in the best interest of the children. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum explaining our decision has been provided to the parties.