Case Name: Richard H. PARNES and Sandra S. Parnes, Appellants, v. Jeffrey WILLNER, Sherill Willner, the Keyes Company and the Klock Company, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1984-07-10
Citations: 453 So. 2d 1148
Docket Number: No. 84-338
Parties: Richard H. PARNES and Sandra S. Parnes, Appellants, v. Jeffrey WILLNER, Sherill Willner, the Keyes Company and the Klock Company, Appellees.
Judges: Before NESBITT, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 453
Pages: 1148–1148

Head Matter:
Richard H. PARNES and Sandra S. Parnes, Appellants, v. Jeffrey WILLNER, Sherill Willner, the Keyes Company and the Klock Company, Appellees.
No. 84-338.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 10, 1984.
Rehearing Denied Aug. 30, 1984.
Albert J. Zemlock, Miami, for appellants.
Daniel Mones and Frank M. Marks, Miami, for appellees.
Before NESBITT, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellants have conceded that there is no record of their having challenged below the authority of their attorney to enter into the settlement agreement, and this challenge, having been made for the first time in their reply brief, is not preserved for review. The record does reflect that the only challenge made below to the agreement, and indeed the only challenge made in their initial brief, was that the written communication sent by appellants' attorney did not constitute an offer of settlement which was capable of being accepted. The trial court correctly ruled that the latter challenge was without merit.
Affirmed.