Case Name: Ramapo Police Benevolent Association, on Behalf of Neil Sweeney, Respondent, v. Town of Ramapo, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1996-06-03
Citations: 228 A.D.2d 426
Docket Number: 
Parties: Ramapo Police Benevolent Association, on Behalf of Neil Sweeney, Respondent, v Town of Ramapo, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 228
Pages: 426–427

Head Matter:
Ramapo Police Benevolent Association, on Behalf of Neil Sweeney, Respondent, v Town of Ramapo, Appellant.
[643 NYS2d 665]

Opinion:
The language contained in paragraph 3 (c) of the parties' Memorandum Agreement is ambiguous with regard to whether the 8% midnight shift pay differential applies immediately upon an employee's return to active duty "after 18 days of combined sick days and LOD absences cumulative or otherwise". In light of the foregoing, it was improper for the Supreme Court to grant the plaintiffs cross motion for summary judgment in its favor (cf., Ñamad v Salomon, Inc., 74 NY2d 751). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Joy, Hart and Krausman, JJ., concur.