Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Trinidad PEREZ-AGUILAR, aka Trini, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-12-12
Citations: 154 F. App'x 683
Docket Number: No. 05-55402
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jose Trinidad PEREZ-AGUILAR, aka Trini, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: GOODWIN, W. FLETCHER, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 154
Pages: 683–683

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jose Trinidad PEREZ-AGUILAR, aka Trini, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 05-55402.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 5, 2005.
Decided Dec. 12, 2005.
US Attorneys Office, USSD — Office of The U.S. Attorney, Peter Ko, Esq., United States Department of Justice, Southern District of California, San Diego, CA, Plaintiff — Appellee.
Jose Trinidad Perezr-Aguilar, Lexington, KY, pro se.
Before: GOODWIN, W. FLETCHER, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Federal prisoner Jose Trinidad Perez-Aguilar appeals pro se the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence for conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine. We affirm the district court's denial of Perez-Aguilar's § 2255 motion as untimely because Perez-Aguilar filed his motion more than one year after his conviction became final, and he failed to demonstrate that his motion qualifies for an exception to the one-year filing limitation. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255(3); United States v. Cruz, 423 F.3d 1119, 1119-20 (9th Cir.2005) (per curiam) (holding that the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), does not apply retroactively to cases on collateral review).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.