Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kevin TUCKER, a/k/a KT, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-10-12
Citations: 484 F. App'x 845
Docket Number: No. 12-6877
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kevin TUCKER, a/k/a KT, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 484
Pages: 845–846

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kevin TUCKER, a/k/a KT, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-6877.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 12, 2012.
Decided: Oct. 12, 2012.
Kevin Tucker, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Sinclair Duffey, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appel-lee.
Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kevin Tucker appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Tucker, No. 3:05-cr-00322-REP-1 (E.D.Va. Apr. 27, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.