Case Name: Eugene HARRIS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1994-07-26
Citations: 879 S.W.2d 800
Docket Number: No. 65240
Parties: Eugene HARRIS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 879
Pages: 800–800

Head Matter:
Eugene HARRIS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. 65240.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
July 26, 1994.
Judith C. LaRose, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).