Case Name: John HICKS, Defendant-Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1993-08-31
Citations: 860 S.W.2d 392
Docket Number: No. 63342
Parties: John HICKS, Defendant-Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 860
Pages: 392–393

Head Matter:
John HICKS, Defendant-Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent.
No. 63342.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Aug. 31, 1993.
Dave Hemingway, St. Louis, for defendant-movant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., F. Martin Dajani, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff-respondent.
Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, John Hicks, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The judgment of conviction sought to be vacated was for stealing a motor vehicle for which movant was sentenced on his plea of guilty to imprisonment for three years.
The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value.
The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).