Case Name: SUNSHINE STATE ELECTRIC OF SOUTH FLORIDA, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellant, v. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & DESIGN CO., a Florida corporation; and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland; and the City of Cooper City, Florida, a municipal corporation, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1988-08-24
Citations: 529 So. 2d 832
Docket Number: No. 87-2831
Parties: SUNSHINE STATE ELECTRIC OF SOUTH FLORIDA, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellant, v. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & DESIGN CO., a Florida corporation; and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland; and the City of Cooper City, Florida, a municipal corporation, Appellees.
Judges: GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., and COOK, JACK H., Associate Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 529
Pages: 832–833

Head Matter:
SUNSHINE STATE ELECTRIC OF SOUTH FLORIDA, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellant, v. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & DESIGN CO., a Florida corporation; and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland; and the City of Cooper City, Florida, a municipal corporation, Appellees.
No. 87-2831.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Aug. 24, 1988.
Robert Paul Vignola of Marko & Stepha-ny, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
James 0. Murphy, Jr., of Byrd and Murphy, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee-Fidelity and Deposit Co. of Maryland.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The trial court entered final judgment dismissing plaintiffs complaint with preju dice because it appeared upon its face that a statute of limitations had run. The performance and payment bond, however, a copy of which was furnished by amendment to the complaint, indicates such may not be the case. Accordingly, it was error to dismiss with prejudice.
We reverse and remand.
GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., and COOK, JACK H., Associate Judge, concur.