Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Viarquez BORDEN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-02-13
Citations: 217 F. App'x 873
Docket Number: No. 05-12863
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Viarquez BORDEN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before BIRCH, BARKETT and WILSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 217
Pages: 873–874

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Viarquez BORDEN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-12863
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Feb. 13, 2007.
Yvette Rhodes, Tampa, FL, for United States of America.
Scott Kalisch, Miami, FL, for Viarquez Borden.
Before BIRCH, BARKETT and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Scott Kalisch, retained appellate counsel for Viarquez Borden, has filed a renewed motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent re view of the now complete record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Borden's conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
. Kalisch previously filed a motion to withdraw, pursuant to Anders, which we denied without prejudice, but with leave to refile after he obtained the necessary transcripts to complete the record.