Case Name: NEIGHBORS et v. THISTLE DOWN CO. et
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1927
Citations: 6 Ohio Law Abs. 359
Docket Number: 
Parties: NEIGHBORS et v. THISTLE DOWN CO. et.
Judges: (Levine, PJ., and Sullivan, J., concur.)
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 6
Pages: 359–359

Head Matter:
NEIGHBORS et v. THISTLE DOWN CO. et.
Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist., Cuyahoga Co.
Boyd, Cannon, Brooks & Wickham, Cleveland, for Neighbors.
Geo. W. Spooner, Cleveland, for Thistle Down Co.

Opinion:
VICKERY, J.
1. Order appointing receiver for corporation was final order to which petition in error may be prosecuted.
2. Order overruling motion to remove receiver is not an order affecting- substantial rights of parties to which error may be prosecuted.
3. Where receiver was appointed and court subsequently overruled motion to remove receiver, petition in error filed more than seventy days after order appointing receiver was entered by common pleas court, though within seventy days of order overruling motion to remove, was not filed in time.
(Levine, PJ., and Sullivan, J., concur.)
For reference to full opinion, see Omnibus Index, last page, this issue.