Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bruce Lamont GOODWIN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-10-02
Citations: 479 F. App'x 502
Docket Number: No. 12-6836
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bruce Lamont GOODWIN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 479
Pages: 502–502

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bruce Lamont GOODWIN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-6836.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 27, 2012.
Decided: Oct. 2, 2012.
Bruce Lamont Goodwin, Appellant Pro Se. Winston David Holliday, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Bruce Lamont Goodwin appeals the district court's text order denying his post-judgment motion to reduce his sentence. We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. See United States v. Goodwin, No. 5:10-cr-00835-MBS-6 (D.S.C. Apr. 23, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.