Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeffrey Grant PRYSOCK, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-08-24
Citations: 613 F. App'x 239
Docket Number: No. 14-7374
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeffrey Grant PRYSOCK, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 613
Pages: 239–240

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeffrey Grant PRYSOCK, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 14-7374.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 20, 2015.
Decided: Aug. 24, 2015.
Jeffrey Grant Prysock, Appellant Pro Se. Leesa Washington, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jeffrey Grant Prysock appeals the district court's order construing his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and dismissing it for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Prysock, Nos. 7:11-cr-00171-HMH-1; 7:14-cv-02908-HMH (D.S.C. filed July 21, 2014; entered July 22, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.