Case Name: GAMESA ENERGY USA, LLC and Gamesa Technology Corporation Inc., Petitioners v. TEN PENN CENTER ASSOCIATES, L.P. and SAP V Ten Penn Center NF G.P. L.L.C., Respondents Gamesa Energy USA, LLC and Gamesa Technology Corporation Inc., Respondents v. Ten Penn Center Associates, L.P. and SAP V Ten Penn Center NF G.P. L.L.C., Petitioners
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2018-08-20
Citations: 191 A.3d 749
Docket Number: No. 139 EAL 2018; No. 152 EAL 2018
Parties: GAMESA ENERGY USA, LLC and Gamesa Technology Corporation Inc., Petitioners
v.
TEN PENN CENTER ASSOCIATES, L.P. and SAP V Ten Penn Center NF G.P. L.L.C., Respondents
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 191
Pages: 749–749

Head Matter:
GAMESA ENERGY USA, LLC and Gamesa Technology Corporation Inc., Petitioners
v.
TEN PENN CENTER ASSOCIATES, L.P. and SAP V Ten Penn Center NF G.P. L.L.C., Respondents
Gamesa Energy USA, LLC and Gamesa Technology Corporation Inc., Respondents
v.
Ten Penn Center Associates, L.P. and SAP V Ten Penn Center NF G.P. L.L.C., Petitioners
No. 139 EAL 2018
No. 152 EAL 2018
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
August 20, 2018
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 20th day of August, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal at 139 EAL 2018 is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioners, are:
1. May a litigant simultaneously pursue inconsistent, alternative remedies in a civil action in Pennsylvania prior to the entry of final judgment?
2. When one party to a contract breaches, should the non-breaching party be permitted to continue performance, if reasonable under the circumstances, and to maintain, in the alternative, causes of action for termination of the agreement if material, or if not material, for damages from the breach?
The Cross Petition for Allowance of Appeal at 152 EAL 2018 is DENIED.