Case Name: Parker Benjamin, Inc. v. New London Inn Associates et al.
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1988-05-24
Citations: 15 Conn. App. 801
Docket Number: 5953
Parties: Parker Benjamin, Inc. v. New London Inn Associates et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Appellate Reports
Volume: 15
Pages: 801–802

Head Matter:
Parker Benjamin, Inc. v. New London Inn Associates et al.
(5953)
Spallone, Stoughton and Foti, Js.
Argued May 19—
decision released May 24, 1988
John C. Wirzbicki, for the appellants (defendants).
Glenn E. Coe, with whom, on the brief, was John J. Kindi, for the appellee (plaintiff).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The defendant attacks the factual findings of the trial court and, in addition, challenges the trial court's construction of the contract between the parties.
We will not retry the issues where, as here, there is ample evidence to support the factual findings; nor will we reconstrue the contract where, as here, the construction made by the trial court reveals no abuse of discretion in that it manifests a lawful, logical and reasonable interpretation of the unambiguous language of the contract.
There is no error.