Case Name: Calvin Scott WEDINGTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNNAMED DEPUTY U.S. MARSHAL; Kenny Atkinson; Nurse Beasley; Matthew W. Mellady, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-10-18
Citations: 669 F. App'x 652
Docket Number: No. 16-6746
Parties: Calvin Scott WEDINGTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNNAMED DEPUTY U.S. MARSHAL; Kenny Atkinson; Nurse Beasley; Matthew W. Mellady, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 669
Pages: 652–652

Head Matter:
Calvin Scott WEDINGTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNNAMED DEPUTY U.S. MARSHAL; Kenny Atkinson; Nurse Beasley; Matthew W. Mellady, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-6746
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: October 7, 2016
Decided: October 18, 2016
Calvin Scott Wedington, Appellant Pro Se.
Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Calvin Scott Wedington appeals from the district court's order dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) (2012) his civil action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). On appeal, Wedington fails to explain how the district court erred in its dismissal decision. Accordingly, Wedington has waived appellate review of the court's order. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); Wahi v. Charleston Area Med. Ctr., Inc., 562 F.3d 599, 607 (4th Cir. 2009); Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). We thus grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED