Case Name: In the Matter of Valynda Garner, Petitioner, v. New York City Administration for Children's Services et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2015-08-04
Citations: 131 A.D.3d 417
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Valynda Garner, Petitioner, v New York City Administration for Children’s Services et al., Respondents.
Judges: Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Renwick, Andrias, DeGrasse and Gische, JJ.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 131
Pages: 417–418

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Valynda Garner, Petitioner, v New York City Administration for Children’s Services et al., Respondents.
[13 NYS3d 832]

Opinion:
Determination of respondent New York State Office of Children and Family Services (OCFS), dated March 13, 2012, which, after a fair hearing, denied petitioner's request to have sealed and marked unfounded, an indicated report to respondent New York State Central Register of Child Abuse and Maltreatment that she had maltreated her son, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Alice Schlesinger, J.], entered Aug. 5, 2013), dismissed, without costs.
A report of child abuse or maltreatment must be established at an administrative expungement hearing by a fair preponderance of the evidence (see Matter of Lee TT. v Dowling, 87 NY2d 699, 703 [1996]). "Upon judicial review, the inquiry is limited to whether the administrative determination is supported by substantial evidence in the record" (see Matter of Valentine v New York State Cent. Register of Child Abusers & Maltreatment, 37 AD3d 249, 250 [1st Dept 2007]).
OCFS's denial of petitioner's request to have the indicated report marked unfounded and sealed is supported by substantial evidence. The record does not support petitioner's claim that OCFS and the New York City Administration for Children's Services relied on prior unsubstantiated reports of abuse or maltreatment.
We have considered petitioner's other arguments and find them unavailing.
Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Renwick, Andrias, DeGrasse and Gische, JJ.