Case Name: Julius GREEN, Appellant, v. Harry ZUKERNICK, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1961-10-09
Citations: 133 So. 2d 442
Docket Number: No. 60-666
Parties: Julius GREEN, Appellant, v. Harry ZUKERNICK, Appellee.
Judges: Before PEARSON, TILLMAN, C. J., and HORTON and HENDRY, TJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 133
Pages: 442–442

Head Matter:
Julius GREEN, Appellant, v. Harry ZUKERNICK, Appellee.
No. 60-666.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
Oct. 9, 1961.
Simon Englander, Miami Beach, for appellant.
Dean, Adams, Fischer & Gautier and Robert M. Sturrup, Miami, for appellee.
Before PEARSON, TILLMAN, C. J., and HORTON and HENDRY, TJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellee, an attorney, was sued by a former client for malpractice and breach of fiduciary relationship. The action was in chancery and sought certain equitable relief, including an accounting and a money judgment.
After hearing testimony and considering certain documentary proofs, the chancellor found against the appellant and rendered a decree dismissing the complaint with prejudice.
The appellant contends here that there was substantial evidence to support the allegations of the complaint. We have carefully considered the evidence and proofs submitted before the chancellor and are of the view that the findings made and the conclusions reached are not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Conversely, there is sufficient evidence to support the chancellor's findings, and the decree should be affirmed.
Affirmed.