Case Name: JUANITA NASH v. CONRAD INDUSTRIES, INC. and IOWA NATIONAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 1983-11-03
Citations: 309 N.C. 629
Docket Number: No. 379A83
Parties: JUANITA NASH v. CONRAD INDUSTRIES, INC. and IOWA NATIONAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Judges: 
Reporter: North Carolina Reports
Volume: 309
Pages: 629–629

Head Matter:
JUANITA NASH v. CONRAD INDUSTRIES, INC. and IOWA NATIONAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
No. 379A83
(Filed 3 November 1983)
Defendants appeal as a matter of right pursuant to G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of the Court of Appeals, 62 N.C. App. 612, — S.E. 2d — (1983), one judge dissenting, which affirmed in part and reversed in part the Opinion and Award of the Industrial Commission.
Snyder, Leonard, Biggers & Dodd, P.A., by Gary A. Dodd, for the plaintiff-appellee.
Van Winkle, Buck, Wall, Starnes & Davis, P.A., by Roy W. Davis, Jr. and Allan R. Tarleton, for defendant-appellant.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The facts of this case are set out at length in the opinion of the Court of Appeals. The majority of the panel of the Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the Industrial Commission's Opinion and Award for further findings relating to whether the plaintiff was totally disabled for any employment between 8 June 1980 and 1 October 1981. We agree with the majority opinion. The Court of Appeals unanimously affirmed the Industrial Commission's Award with respect to plaintiffs permanent partial disability to her back and knees. We note that there is no indication in the record that the aggravation of the plaintiffs knee injury, which eventually led to permanent partial disability of plaintiffs knees, occurred prior to the initial hearing before the Hearing Commissioner. Nevertheless, as the Court of Appeals held, the Full Commission has the authority, pursuant to G.S. § 97-85, to reconsider evidence, take additional evidence, rehear the parties and, if appropriate, amend the award. Thus, it was proper for the Industrial Commission, in review of the Hearing Commissioner's Opinion and Award, to consider evidence relating to the disability of plaintiffs knees.
The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
Affirmed.