Case Name: Frances B. GLENN, D.D.S., Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1982-01-12
Citations: 410 So. 2d 935
Docket Number: No. 80-2037
Parties: Frances B. GLENN, D.D.S., Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, Appellee.
Judges: . Before BASKIN, DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 410
Pages: 935–936

Head Matter:
Frances B. GLENN, D.D.S., Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, Appellee.
No. 80-2037.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan. 12, 1982.
On Rehearing March 4, 1982.
Joe N. Unger; Finley, Kumble, Wagner, Heine & Underberg, Miami, for appellant.
Carol Gregg, Tallahassee, for appellee.
. Before BASKIN, DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.

Opinion:
FERGUSON, Judge.
The final order of the Board of Denistry, Department of Professional Regulation suspending appellant's license to practice dentistry for six months and fining her $1,000.00 is affirmed upon our finding that there is competent substantial evidence to support each of the Agency's factual determinations of violation of Section 466.-028(1)(g), Florida Statutes (1979), and a violation of Section 466.028(1)(aa).
Upon review of an agency decision, an appellate court may not reweigh or reevaluate the evidence even though the court may disagree with the trial court's resolution of that conflict. Graham v. Estuary Properties, Inc., 399 So.2d 1374 (Fla.1981); Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So.2d 13 (Fla.1976); Metropolitan Dade County v. Mingo, 339 So.2d 302 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).
We note that even if we had determined that any one of the violations was not supported by the evidence, it would have been a useless act to remand on authority of Florida Real Estate Commission v. Webb, 367 So.2d 201 (Fla.1978) for reconsideration of the length of suspension, which penalty we consider extremely harsh on these facts, in that a single violation under Section 466.-028(1)(aa) mandates a minimum six-month suspension.
Affirmed.