Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio OWENS, a/k/a Tonio, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-03-22
Citations: 641 F. App'x 291
Docket Number: No. 15-7841
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio OWENS, a/k/a Tonio, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 641
Pages: 291–292

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio OWENS, a/k/a Tonio, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-7841.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 17, 2016.
Decided: March 22, 2016.
Antonio Owens, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Drake, John C. Potterfield, Jane Barrett Taylor, Assistant United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina, Carrie Fisher Sherard, Leesa Washington, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Antonio Owens appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Owens, No. 3:02-cr-00548-CMC-26 (D.S.C. Nov. 9, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.