Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. ALLAN OLIVER CARDWELL, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1975-08-04
Citations: 22 Or. App. 240
Docket Number: No. C 74-09-2690 Cr
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. ALLAN OLIVER CARDWELL, Appellant.
Judges: Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Thornton and Lee, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 22
Pages: 240–241

Head Matter:
Argued July 24,
affirmed August 4,
reconsideration denied September 17,
petition for review denied October 14, 1975
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. ALLAN OLIVER CARDWELL, Appellant.
(No. C 74-09-2690 Cr)
538 P2d 372
J. Marvin Kuhn, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender., Salem.
Donald L. Paillette, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Lee Johnson, Attorney General, and W. Michael Gillette, Solicitor General, Salem.
Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Thornton and Lee, Judges.

Opinion:
PEE CUEIAM.
Defendant's sole contention on appeal is that the trial court erred in not instructing the jury to the effect that intoxication could he considered in determining whether defendant had a mental disease or defect at the time he is alleged to have shot the victim. We do not reach this question because defendant did not request the trial judge to give an instruction on this point nor did he except to any of the instructions that were given on the subject.
Affirmed.