Case Name: Curtis R. HILL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LEE COUNTY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; A.J. Padula; D. Mitchell; James E. Sligh, Jr., Division Director Classification and Inmate Records, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-07-26
Citations: 139 F. App'x 568
Docket Number: No. 05-6511
Parties: Curtis R. HILL, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. LEE COUNTY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; A.J. Padula; D. Mitchell; James E. Sligh, Jr., Division Director Classification and Inmate Records, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 139
Pages: 568–568

Head Matter:
Curtis R. HILL, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. LEE COUNTY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; A.J. Padula; D. Mitchell; James E. Sligh, Jr., Division Director Classification and Inmate Records, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 05-6511.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 14, 2005.
Decided: July 26, 2005.
Curtis R. Hill, Appellant pro se.
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Curtis R. Hill appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hill v. County Corr. Inst., No. CA-05-693-6 (D.S.C. Mar. 25, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED