Case Name: United States ex. rel. John Rush vs. B. T. Watson
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Decision Date: 1856-11-08
Citations: 2 Hay. & Haz. 226
Docket Number: 
Parties: United States ex. rel. John Rush vs. B. T. Watson.
Judges: 
Reporter: Reports of cases, civil and criminal, argued and adjudged in the Circuit court of the District of Columbia for the county of Washington
Volume: 2
Pages: 226–227

Head Matter:
United States ex. rel. John Rush vs. B. T. Watson.
At Law.
Decided November 8, 1856.
On a Writ of Habeas Corpus.
Under the act of Congress of March 2, 1837, Section 1, a minor of the age of 18 can enlist in the Navy, without the consent of his parents or guardian,
Mr. Giberson for the Petitioner.
Mr. Key for the United States.

Opinion:
This was a habeas corpus issued by Judge Dunlop, and directed to an officer, commanding him to have the body of John H. Rush before him on a certain day, at 12 o'clock, M. The officer returned to the writ that he held Rush as a deserter from the ship Pennsylvania, and for no other cause.
The enlistment of Rush was made under the 1st Section of the Act of Congress, approved March 2d, 1837.
Mr. Giberson, for the petitioner, claimed his discharge upon the ground that the government had no right to enlist Rush under the Act, not having the consent of his mother to enlist him for the term for which he was enlisted.
The Act of Congress authorizes the government to enlist boys not being under 13, nor over i& years of age, with the consent of their parents or guardians, until 21 years of age, and to employ other persons for a term not exceeding 5 years.
Mr. Key, for the United States, maintained that the government had a right, by the words " other persons" to enlist boys under thirteen or over eighteen years of age without the consent of their parents or guardians. That the contract between Rush and the government was made when Rush was eighteen years old, and was a valid contract.
Judges Morsell and Merrick were of this opinion, and Judge Dunlop dissented.
After hearing the counsel on both sides, the following order was thereupon issued:
That the petitioner be remanded to the custody of B. T, W'atson, subject to the order of the Navy Department, and that the writ of habeas corpus be quashed.