Case Name: James A. Benage, Administrator, etc., v. The Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Company
Court: Michigan Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Michigan
Decision Date: 1895-04-26
Citations: 102 Mich. 79
Docket Number: 
Parties: James A. Benage, Administrator, etc., v. The Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Company.
Judges: Grant and Hooker, JJ., concurred with Long, J.
Reporter: Michigan Reports
Volume: 102
Pages: 79–82

Head Matter:
James A. Benage, Administrator, etc., v. The Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Company.
[See ante, 72.]
Contributory negligence.
This case Is ruled by Glover v. Seotten, 82 Mich. 869, and there , is nothing in the cases cited or arguments made on the rehearing to change the views expressed in the former majority opinion.
Rehearing, upon application of plaintiff, of case reported in 102 Mich. 72.
Argued January 29, 1895.
Former decision affirmed April 26, 1895.
The facts are stated in the .several opinions.
R. R. Pealer, George E. Miller, and Bishop E. Andrews, ':for appellant.
O. E. Weaver (George G. Greene and O. G. Getzen-Danner, of counsel), for defendant.

Opinion:
Long, J.
This case has been reargued, and the points raised fully and carefully reconsidered.
I am unable to find anything in the cases cited or the arguments made to change my views, expressed in the iormer opinion. The ease falls so clearly within Glover v. Scotten, 82 Mich. 369, that it must be ruled by it, and I am not prepared to overrule that case.
Judgment must be affirmed.
Grant and Hooker, JJ., concurred with Long, J.