Case Name: Curtis R. DAVY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE; United States of America, Respondents-appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-11-07
Citations: 50 F. App'x 122
Docket Number: No. 02-6395
Parties: Curtis R. DAVY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE; United States of America, Respondents-appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 50
Pages: 122–123

Head Matter:
Curtis R. DAVY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE; United States of America, Respondents-appellees.
No. 02-6395.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 28, 2002.
Decided Nov. 7, 2002.
Curtis R. Davy, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Frank McDonald, Office of the United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Curtis R. Davy appeals the district court's order granting the Respondents' motion to dismiss his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court, see Davy v. INS, No. CA-01 — 4033-6-13AK (D.S.C. filed Jan. 4, 2002 & entered Jan. 8, 2002), and on the reasoning of our recent decision in Chambers v. Reno, 307 F.3d 284 (4th Cir.2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.