Case Name: EMILE KARAM, PROSECUTOR-RESPONDENT, v. FRED J. WOLFE, BUILDING INSPECTOR, ETC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1943-01-22
Citations: 129 N.J.L. 441
Docket Number: 
Parties: EMILE KARAM, PROSECUTOR-RESPONDENT, v. FRED J. WOLFE, BUILDING INSPECTOR, ETC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 129
Pages: 441–441

Head Matter:
EMILE KARAM, PROSECUTOR-RESPONDENT, v. FRED J. WOLFE, BUILDING INSPECTOR, ETC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Argued October 22, 1942
Decided January 22, 1943.
For the appellants, Gerald T. Foley.
For the respondent, Ralph N. Solodar.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judges being equally divided on the question whether the judgment should be reversed, the judgment is affirmed, solely because of such division, which renders any opinion by the court impossible.
The judgment herein is affirmed by an equally divided court.
For affirmance—The Chief Justice, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Porter, Dear, Thompson, JJ. 7.
For reversal—The Chancellor, Case, Heher, Colie, Wells, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 7.