Case Name: Ronald EDMUNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2006-04-28
Citations: 927 So. 2d 204
Docket Number: No. 5D05-131
Parties: Ronald EDMUNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: THOMPSON, GRIFFIN and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 927
Pages: 204–204

Head Matter:
Ronald EDMUNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D05-131.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
April 28, 2006.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Rose M. Levering, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Roark Wall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See State v. Espinosa, 686 So.2d 1345, 1348-49 (Fla.1996) (holding a defendant who requests an instruction on a lesser-included offense cannot contest the sufficiency of the evidence on the lesser-included offense when sufficient evidence exists to convict the defendant for the greater offense).
THOMPSON, GRIFFIN and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.