Case Name: Martin H. Herold, Respondent, v. Eugenia Silston et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1952-03-17
Citations: 279 A.D. 926
Docket Number: 
Parties: Martin H. Herold, Respondent, v. Eugenia Silston et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 279
Pages: 926–926

Head Matter:
Martin H. Herold, Respondent, v. Eugenia Silston et al., Appellants.

Opinion:
The renewal note did not effect payment on the prior note, now sued upon, and the payee was, therefore, an owner and holder, entitled to sue and, on proper proof, entitled to recover thereon. Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Wenzel and Schmidt, JJ.