Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Steven LESANE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-08-27
Citations: 341 F. App'x 907
Docket Number: No. 09-6726
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. James Steven LESANE, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 341
Pages: 907–908

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. James Steven LESANE, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 09-6726.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 20, 2009.
Decided: Aug. 27, 2009.
James Steven Lesane, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Wu, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James Steven Lesane appeals the district ' court's order denying his Fed. R.Crim.P. 33 motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lesane, No. 3:08-cr-00185-HEH-1, 2009 WL 891802 (E.D.Va. Apr. 1, 2009). We deny Lesane's motions for release pending appeal, for relief under 60(b)(6), and to supplement his appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.