Case Name: Ern REYNOLDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF ROANOKE, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-12-22
Citations: 459 F. App'x 287
Docket Number: No. 11-1803
Parties: Ern REYNOLDS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. CITY OF ROANOKE, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before KING and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 459
Pages: 287–288

Head Matter:
Ern REYNOLDS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. CITY OF ROANOKE, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 11-1803.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 12, 2011.
Decided: Dec. 22, 2011.
Ern Reynolds, Appellant Pro Se. David Lee Collins, Office of the City Attorney for the City of Roanoke, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before KING and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ern Reynolds appeals the district court's orders dismissing his action alleging various constitutional violations with respect to application of zoning ordinances and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Reynolds v. City of Roanoke, No. 7:10-CV-00260-JCT, 2011 WL 2787269 (W.D.Va. July 13, 2011; July 19, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.