Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Norman Arthur NEWLON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1972-04-27
Citations: 460 F.2d 1268
Docket Number: No. 71-2393
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Norman Arthur NEWLON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MERRILL, BROWNING and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 460
Pages: 1268–1269

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Norman Arthur NEWLON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 71-2393.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
April 27, 1972.
John Caughlan, (argued) Seattle, Wash., for appellant.
Thomas P. Giere, Asst. U. S. Atty., (argued) Susan Barnes, Asst. U. S. Atty., Stan Pitkin, U. S. Atty., Seattle, Wash., for appellee.
Before MERRILL, BROWNING and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
This appeal is taken from conviction of failure to report for induction into the Armed Forces of the United States, a violation of 50 U.S.C.App. § 462(a). Issues are raised respecting the manner in which appellant's conscientious objection claim was handled by the local and appeal boards and appellant's ability to secure judicial review of that matter. These we need not reach. In our judgment reversal is compelled by Fisher v. United States, 413 F.2d 1034 (9th Cir. 1969). See also Graves v. United States, 252 F.2d 878 (9th Cir. 1958).
Appellant was indicted for knowing failure to report "on or about March 11, 1968." Because of his absence from his place of residence he did not receive his order to report on that date until a few days after the date. Under Fisher, supra, failure to report on the date ordered is not knowing in these circumstances.
Reversed.