Case Name: Marisa Morel, Appellant, v. Elisha Hanson, Respondent; Eugene Weintraub, Appellant, v. Elisha Hanson and Mozart Opera Company, Inc., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1940-06-14
Citations: 259 A.D. 991
Docket Number: 
Parties: Marisa Morel, Appellant, v. Elisha Hanson, Respondent. Eugene Weintraub, Appellant, v. Elisha Hanson and Mozart Opera Company, Inc., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 259
Pages: 991–992

Head Matter:
Marisa Morel, Appellant, v. Elisha Hanson, Respondent. Eugene Weintraub, Appellant, v. Elisha Hanson and Mozart Opera Company, Inc., Respondents.

Opinion:
Orders unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. In view of the equivocal character of the allegations of the complaints, we think that the defense of the Statute of Frauds should remain in the answers against any possible contingency arising on the trial. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.