Case Name: Larry James SWARTZ et al., Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1975-07-14
Citations: 316 So. 2d 623
Docket Number: No. T-448
Parties: Larry James SWARTZ et al., Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: BOYER, C. J., and RAWLS and Mc-CORD, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 316
Pages: 623–624

Head Matter:
Larry James SWARTZ et al., Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. T-448.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
July 14, 1975.
Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, and David J. Busch, Asst. Public Defender, for appellants.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Michael M. Corin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
This case is a companion to Larry James Swartz, Arnold Glenn Woodrum and Jack D. Haynes v. State of Florida, Fla.App., 316 So.2d 618 and the charges giving rise to the judgments and sentences here appealed emanate from the same factual situation.
We have carefully examined the record on appeal and the briefs filed by able counsel. The only issue raised which warrants discussion relates to the validity of a search warrant which is the identical warrant discussed by us at length in the com panion case above mentioned. Nothing would be added to the jurisprudence of this State by reiterating here that which was said there.
Appellants having failed to demonstrate prejudicial error, the judgments and sentences appealed are
Affirmed.
BOYER, C. J., and RAWLS and Mc-CORD, JJ., concur.