Case Name: Howard K. GILES, Treasurer of Miller County, Arkansas v. TEXARKANA SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 7 OF MILLER COUNTY, Arkansas, and FOUKE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 15 OF MILLER COUNTY, Arkansas
Court: Arkansas Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Arkansas
Decision Date: 1982-02-08
Citations: 275 Ark. 121
Docket Number: 81-183
Parties: Howard K. GILES, Treasurer of Miller County, Arkansas v. TEXARKANA SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 7 OF MILLER COUNTY, Arkansas, and FOUKE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 15 OF MILLER COUNTY, Arkansas
Judges: Dudley, J., not participating.
Reporter: Arkansas Reports
Volume: 275
Pages: 121–122

Head Matter:
Howard K. GILES, Treasurer of Miller County, Arkansas v. TEXARKANA SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 7 OF MILLER COUNTY, Arkansas, and FOUKE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 15 OF MILLER COUNTY, Arkansas
81-183
627 S.W. 2d 554
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Opinion delivered February 8, 1982
Jim Gunter, Pros. Atty., by: Kirk D. Johnson, Deputy Pros. Atty., for appellant.
Arnold, Lavender, Rochelle, Barnette Or Franks, by: G. William Lavender, for appellees.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The merits of this appeal cannot be reached because the abstract is so deficient we cannot follow, much less decide, the allegations of error. Appellant contends that the chancery court lacked jurisdiction to decide the claim, that its motion to dismiss should have been granted, that there was an adequate remedy at law and that no grounds for injunctive relief exist. We are asked to decide these procedural and substantive issues with no abstracting of the complaint, answer, motion to dismiss, the final judgment, or any of the exhibits. Where that occurs we have no real choice but to affirm the case. See our Rule 9 (e) (2). Smith v. Smith, 263 Ark. 578, 567 S.W. 2d 88 (1978); Bank of Ozark v. Isaacs, et al., 263 Ark. 113, 563 S.W. 2d 707 (1978); Dairyland Insurance Co. v. Carter, 261 Ark. 795, 551 S.W. 2d 211 (1977).
Affirmed.
Dudley, J., not participating.