Case Name: Alfred G. Burnham et al., Suing on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Stockholders of Brooklyn-Manhattan Transit Corporation Similarly Situated, Respondents, v. Matthew C. Brush et al., Defendants, and Arthur H. Bunker et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1948-03-29
Citations: 273 A.D. 891
Docket Number: 
Parties: Alfred G. Burnham et al., Suing on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Stockholders of Brooklyn-Manhattan Transit Corporation Similarly Situated, Respondents, v. Matthew C. Brush et al., Defendants, and Arthur H. Bunker et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 273
Pages: 891–892

Head Matter:
Alfred G. Burnham et al., Suing on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Stockholders of Brooklyn-Manhattan Transit Corporation Similarly Situated, Respondents, v. Matthew C. Brush et al., Defendants, and Arthur H. Bunker et al., Appellants.

Opinion:
As we are unable to distinguish this case from Coane v. American Distilling Go. (270 App. Div. 1001) we feel constrained to reverse the order appealed from and grant the motion for judgment on the pleadings dismissing the amended complaint. Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellants, and the motion granted. Present — Peck, •P. J., Dore, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ. [184 Mise. 815.]