Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Dennis APEL, Defendant-Appellant; United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Dennis Apel, Defendant-Appellant; United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Dennis Apel, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-08-14
Citations: 763 F.3d 1088
Docket Number: Nos. 11-50003, 11-50004, 11-50005
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Dennis APEL, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Dennis Apel, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Dennis Apel, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: BARRY G. SILVERMAN and JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and JOHN R. TUNHEIM, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 763
Pages: 1088–1089

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Dennis APEL, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Dennis Apel, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Dennis Apel, Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 11-50003, 11-50004, 11-50005.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Aug. 14, 2014.
Erwin Chemerinsky, Selwyn Chu (argued) and Matthew Plunkett (argued), law students, University of California, Irvine School of Law, for DefendanL-Appellant.
André Birotte Jr., United States Attorney, Robert E. Dugdale and Mark R. Yo-halem (argued), Assistant United States Attorneys, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Before: BARRY G. SILVERMAN and JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and JOHN R. TUNHEIM, District Judge.
The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
On February 26, 2014, the United States Supreme Court vacated our opinion at 676 F.3d 1202 and remanded the case to us for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. United States v. Apel, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 1144, 186 L.Ed.2d 75 (2014).
In light of the Supreme Court's decision, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.