Case Name: Maurice BERK, Appellant, v. Richard CARLO, individually, etc., et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-10-25
Citations: 550 So. 2d 537
Docket Number: No. 88-1775
Parties: Maurice BERK, Appellant, v. Richard CARLO, individually, etc., et al., Appellees.
Judges: GLICKSTEIN, WAT,DEN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur,
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 550
Pages: 537–537

Head Matter:
Maurice BERK, Appellant, v. Richard CARLO, individually, etc., et al., Appellees.
No. 88-1775.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Oct. 25, 1989.
Hans Feige and Debra Levy Neimark of Neimark & Neimark, P.A., and Ralph Diaz of Law Offices of Ralph Diaz, P.A., Coral Springs, for appellant.
Kim Douglas Sherman of Sherman & Rayson, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees Richard Carlo and Richard Carlo Motors, Inc.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
While we do not agree with the trial court's blanket adoption of appellee's argument, we conclude that it reached the right result. Accordingly, we affirm.
GLICKSTEIN, WAT,DEN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur,