Case Name: Richard BARBER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1997-07-08
Citations: 948 S.W.2d 262
Docket Number: No. 71039
Parties: Richard BARBER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD, and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 948
Pages: 262–262

Head Matter:
Richard BARBER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 71039.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
July 8, 1997.
Douglas R. Hoff, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Daniel G. Cierpiot, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD, and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Richard Barber, appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 24.035 motion, following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).