Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Raaf ATRACH, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-12-17
Citations: 548 F. App'x 293
Docket Number: No. 12-41254
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Raaf ATRACH, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before DAVIS, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 548
Pages: 293–294

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Raaf ATRACH, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-41254
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 17, 2013.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Laura Fletcher Leavitt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before DAVIS, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Raaf Atrach raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Betancourt, 586 F.3d 303, 308-09 (5th Cir.2009), which held that knowledge of drug type and quantity is not an element of the offense under 21 U.S.C. § 841. The appellant's motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.