Case Name: Laura RUIMY, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Flor N. BEAL, et al., Appellees/Cross-Appellants
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2008-11-26
Citations: 997 So. 2d 1139
Docket Number: No. 3D07-533
Parties: Laura RUIMY, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Flor N. BEAL, et al., Appellees/Cross-Appellants.
Judges: Before GERSTEN, C.J., and RAMIREZ, J„ and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 997
Pages: 1139–1144

Head Matter:
Laura RUIMY, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Flor N. BEAL, et al., Appellees/Cross-Appellants.
No. 3D07-533.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 26, 2008.
Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied Feb. 3, 2009.
Grover & Weinstein, Marvin Weinstein, Joel S. Perwin, and Richard B. Rosenthal, Miami, for appellant/cross-appellee.
Luks, Santaniello, Perez, Petrillo & Gold, James P. Waczewski, Tallahassee; Dearman & Gerson, and Mark Dearman, Plantation, for appellees/cross-appellants.
Before GERSTEN, C.J., and RAMIREZ, J„ and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Murphy v. Intl. Robotic Sys., Inc., 766 So.2d 1010 (Fla.2000) (stating that new trial is warranted where argument of counsel is determined to be improper, harmful, incurable, and damaging to trial fairness); McCain v. Fla. Power Corp., 593 So.2d 500 (Fla.1992) (holding that whether and to what extent defendants conduct foreseeably and substantially caused injury is an issue to be determined by the jury based on the specific facts of the case).