Case Name: Mary Apfelberg, Respondent, v. Annie Lax, as Executrix, etc., of Harry Lax, Deceased, and Others, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1930-10
Citations: 230 A.D. 865
Docket Number: 
Parties: Mary Apfelberg, Respondent, v. Annie Lax, as Executrix, etc., of Harry Lax, Deceased, and Others, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 230
Pages: 865–865

Head Matter:
Mary Apfelberg, Respondent, v. Annie Lax, as Executrix, etc., of Harry Lax, Deceased, and Others, Appellants.

Opinion:
Orders denying motions to dismiss amended complaint reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motions granted, with ten dollars costs. In our opinion, the parties to the bond and mortgage contracted in view of the New Jersey statute, and intended that it should apply and be followed in enforcing the contract. Plaintiff not having complied with the provision of the statute relating to filing of notice of this action, her action is, therefore, barred. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.