Case Name: ED JACOBSEN, JR., INC. v. WHITE, et al.
Court: Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jurisdiction: Maryland
Decision Date: 1968-05-31
Citations: 250 Md. 250
Docket Number: No. 301
Parties: ED JACOBSEN, JR., INC. v. WHITE, et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Maryland Reports
Volume: 250
Pages: 250–251

Head Matter:
ED JACOBSEN, JR., INC. v. WHITE, et al.
[No. 301,
September Term, 1967.]
Decided May 31, 1968.
The cause was argued before Hammond, C. J., and Marbury, Barnes, McWilliams, Singley and Smith, JJ.
Kathryn E. Diggs, with whom were Bow'en & Diggs on the brief, for appellant.
Allen Jones, Jr., with whom were Wilkes & Artis, William N. Dunphy and Dunphy, Sanders & Anderson on the brief, for appellees.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The appellant failed completely to meet the requirements of Maryland Rule 828, printing no part of the transcript. The appeal is dismissed under Rule 828 and Rule 835 b (5).
Had we decided the case on the merits, the judgment appealed from would have been affirmed.
Appeal dismissed; costs to be paid by appellant.