Case Name: Edward LANGEL and Joan Langel, Appellants, v. AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-03-17
Citations: 614 So. 2d 1218
Docket Number: No. 92-0700
Parties: Edward LANGEL and Joan Langel, Appellants, v. AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY, Appellee.
Judges: HERSEY, FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 614
Pages: 1218–1218

Head Matter:
Edward LANGEL and Joan Langel, Appellants, v. AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY, Appellee.
No. 92-0700.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
March 17, 1993.
Barbara W. Bronis and Joseph L. Man-nikko, of Frasier & Mannikko, Stuart, for appellants.
Louisa Smith-Adam, of Colin & Smith-Adam, Lake Worth, for appellee Searcy Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
C.R. McDonald, Jr., Fort Pierce, for ap-pellee C.R. McDonald, Jr.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We summarily affirm pursuant to rule 9.315(a), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.
In so doing, we find that appellants have failed to raise any justiciable issue in this appeal. Appellants impermissibly seek to reargue issues they had raised and argued, and which were rejected, in a previous appeal. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Langel, 587 So.2d 1370 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). We therefore award attorneys' fees as costs to appellees pursuant to 57.105(1), Florida Statutes (1991). On remand, the trial court shall determine a reasonable fee for having to respond to this appeal.
AFFIRMED BUT REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS TO AWARD FEES.
HERSEY, FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.