Case Name: In the Interest of J.J., a child
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-05-17
Citations: 542 So. 2d 1070
Docket Number: No. 88-1095
Parties: In the Interest of J.J., a child.
Judges: HERSEY, C.J., and STONE and WARNER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 542
Pages: 1070–1070

Head Matter:
In the Interest of J.J., a child.
No. 88-1095.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
May 17, 1989.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, Marcy K. Allen, Asst. Public Defender, and Sim Gershon, Legal Intern, West Palm Beach, for appellant — J.J., a child.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Joy B. Shearer, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee— State of Fla.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Upon a review of the evidence in the record, we affirm the appellant's adjudication of delinquency for grand theft. We note that the error in admitting the irrelevant contents of an unidentified telephone call was harmless. State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986). However, the state concedes that appellant's additional adjudication for petty theft should be reversed. See Hearn v. State, 55 So.2d 559 (Fla.1951). The order of delinquency is therefore reversed and remanded for modification.
HERSEY, C.J., and STONE and WARNER, JJ., concur.