Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Domingo Guerra ESPINOZA, also known as Domingo Espinoza, also known as Domingo Espinoza Guerra, also known as Domingo Espinoza-Guerra, also known as Miguel A. Espinoza, also known as Domingo Espinosa, also known as Domingo G. Espinoza, also known as Mingo Guerra, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-11-04
Citations: 583 F. App'x 434
Docket Number: No. 13-20656
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Domingo Guerra ESPINOZA, also known as Domingo Espinoza, also known as Domingo Espinoza Guerra, also known as Domingo Espinoza-Guerra, also known as Miguel A. Espinoza, also known as Domingo Espinosa, also known as Domingo G. Espinoza, also known as Mingo Guerra, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 583
Pages: 434–435

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Domingo Guerra ESPINOZA, also known as Domingo Espinoza, also known as Domingo Espinoza Guerra, also known as Domingo Espinoza-Guerra, also known as Miguel A. Espinoza, also known as Domingo Espinosa, also known as Domingo G. Espinoza, also known as Mingo Guerra, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-20656
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Nov. 4, 2014.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Lourdes Rodriguez, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Domingo Guerra Espinoza has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Guerra Espinoza has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.