Case Name: Louis Schwartz, Appellant, v. 45th Street Garage, Inc., Sued Herein as " John Doe," Respondent, and Estelle L. Penning, Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1929-02-21
Citations: 133 Misc. 703
Docket Number: 
Parties: Louis Schwartz, Appellant, v. 45th Street Garage, Inc., Sued Herein as “ John Doe,” Respondent, and Estelle L. Penning, Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 133
Pages: 703–703

Head Matter:
Louis Schwartz, Appellant, v. 45th Street Garage, Inc., Sued Herein as “ John Doe,” Respondent, and Estelle L. Penning, Defendant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
February 21, 1929.
Abraham J. Halprin, for the appellant.
Halperin & Muney, for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
It was error to exclude from evidence the chattel mortgage in suit upon the objection of defendant garage keeper that the copy served on the attorney of said defendant was not " an exact copy " of the paper offered in evidence in that the signature of the mortgagee does not appear on the copy of the chattel mortgage so served.
Judgment and order reversed and a new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.
All concur; present, Delehanty, Lydon and Levy, JJ.