Case Name: MARTIN v. VAN HOOMISSEN et al
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1966-12-21
Citations: 245 Or. 239
Docket Number: 
Parties: MARTIN v. VAN HOOMISSEN et al
Judges: Before McAllister, Chief Justice, and Perry, Sloan, O’Connell, Goodwin, Denecke and Holman, Justices.
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 245
Pages: 239–239

Head Matter:
Argued November 3,
dismissed December 21, 1966
MARTIN v. VAN HOOMISSEN et al
421 P. 2d 369
William C. Martin, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Dusenbery, Martin, Beatty, Parks & Templeton, John C. Beatty, Jr., and Frederick T. Smith, Portland.
Willis A. West, Chief Civil Deputy District Attorney, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was George Van Hoomissen, District Attorney, Portland.
Before McAllister, Chief Justice, and Perry, Sloan, O’Connell, Goodwin, Denecke and Holman, Justices.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from an order of the circuit court for Multnomah county which approved the ballot title for an initiative measure to repeal the Multnomah County Home Rule Charter. This is the same initiative measure involved in our decision in Stuart v. Weldon, 245 Or 203, 421 P2d 367 (1966). That decision makes this case moot and the case is, therefore, dismissed.