Case Name: Dan E. LYDICK, Tr., v. STATE BANKING BOARD OF TEXAS
Court: Texas Commission of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1928-12-12
Citations: 11 S.W.2d 505
Docket Number: No. 1103-5016
Parties: Dan E. LYDICK, Tr., v. STATE BANKING BOARD OF TEXAS.
Judges: GREENWOOD and PIERSON, JJ. Opinion of the Commission of Appeals adopted, and mandamus refused.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 11
Pages: 505–505

Head Matter:
Dan E. LYDICK, Tr., v. STATE BANKING BOARD OF TEXAS.
(No. 1103-5016.)
Commission of Appeals of Texas, Section A.
Dec. 12, 1928.
Spencer & Rogers, of San Antonio, for relator.
Claude Pollard, Atty. Gen., C. W. Truehart, Asst. Atty. Gen., and L. C. Sutton and John W. Goodwin, both of Austin, for respondent.

Opinion:
HARVEY, P. J.
The Supreme Court has this day adopted the opinion of Section B of the Commission, in the case of Edwin Lacy et al. v. State Banking Board, 11 S.W. (2d) 496. The holdings , in that opinion require the same disposition of this case that is made of that case.
We recommend that the mandamus sought herein be refused.
GREENWOOD and PIERSON, JJ. Opinion of the Commission of Appeals adopted, and mandamus refused.