Case Name: COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Respondent, v. RINDGE COMPANY (a Corporation), et al., Appellants
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1921-06-11
Citations: 53 Cal. App. 796
Docket Number: Civ. No. 3261
Parties: COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Respondent, v. RINDGE COMPANY (a Corporation), et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports
Volume: 53
Pages: 796–797

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 3261.
Second Appellate District, Division One.
June 11, 1921.]
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Respondent, v. RINDGE COMPANY (a Corporation), et al., Appellants.
Public Highways — Acquisition of Land by County — Method of Pbocedube.—Order affirmed upon the authority of Adamson v. County of Los Angeles, 52 Cal. App. 125, and County of Los Angeles v. Bindge Co., ante, p. 166.
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County authorizing the county to take immediate possession and use of property condemned for use as a highway. Paul J. McCormick, Judge.
Affirmed.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Anderson & Anderson and Nathan Newby for Appellants.
A. J. Hill, County Counsel, and Paul Vallee, Chief Deputy County Counsel, for Respondent.

Opinion:
SHAW, J.
In a proceeding against defendants for the condemnation of a strip of land for use as a highway, the plaintiff had an interlocutory judgment, followed by a final order and judgment condemning the property. Thereafter, under and in accordance with the provisions of section 1254 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the court made an order under and by virtue of which plaintiff was authorized to take immediate possession and use of the property, from which order defendants have appealed.
In the case of Adamson v. County of Los Angeles, 52 Cal. App. 125, [198 Pac. 52], the plaintiff therein, alleging the order was void, sought to have the county enjoined from the prosecution of work in the construction of the road. From an adverse judgment rendered by the superior court, Adamson appealed. The court of appeal held the order was valid and that no ground existed for the attack made thereon. The determination of the court there had must be deemed decisive of the question. Upon the authority of that case and what is said by this court in County of Los Angeles v. Rindge Co. et al., ante, p. 166, [200 Pac. 27], the order appealed from is affirmed.
Conrey, P. J., and James, J., concurred.