Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Willie CANTY, Jr., Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1970-08-03
Citations: 430 F.2d 1332
Docket Number: No. 13793
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Willie CANTY, Jr., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 430
Pages: 1332–1333

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Willie CANTY, Jr., Appellant.
No. 13793.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Argued July 21, 1970.
Decided Aug. 3, 1970.
John D. Hackett, Baltimore, Md., (Court-appointed) for appellant.
Charles G. Bernstein, Asst. U. S. Atty., (Stephen H. Sachs, U. S. Atty., and Alan B. Lipson, Asst. U. S. Atty., on brief) for appellee.
Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and WINTER and BUTZNER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
On appeal from his conviction for bank robbery, Canty contends that his Sixth Amendment right to counsel was violated by permitting witnesses to the robbery to view a series of photographs, including one of himself, without an attorney's having been present during the photographic confrontation. At the time of the viewing and the resulting identification of Canty as a participant, he was not under arrest for the robbery, though he was confined in another jurisdiction in connection with an unrelated offense. We find no error in the procedure followed. United States v. Marson, 4 Cir., 408 F.2d 644; United States v. Collins, 4 Cir., 416 F.2d 696.
The remaining assignments of error are without merit.
Affirmed.