Case Name: JUDSON et al, Appellants, v. CITY OF LINCOLN CITY et al, Respondents
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1976-08-09
Citations: 26 Or. App. 371
Docket Number: No. 34104, CA 4570
Parties: JUDSON et al, Appellants, v. CITY OF LINCOLN CITY et al, Respondents.
Judges: Lee, J. I join in the opinion of Thornton, J.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 26
Pages: 371–371

Head Matter:
Argued December 18, 1975; reargued March 23,
affirmed August 9, 1976
JUDSON et al, Appellants, v. CITY OF LINCOLN CITY et al, Respondents.
(No. 34104, CA 4570)
552 P2d 588
Scott McArthur, Monmouth, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs were McArthur & Homer, P.C., Monmouth.
James Kulla, Lincoln City, argued the cause for respondent City of Lincoln City and its officers. On the brief was Michael G. Dowsett, City Attorney, Lincoln City.
Dan W. Poling, Lincoln City, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent Journeymen, Inc., an Oregon corporation.
No appearance for respondent Lee Johnson, Attorney General of the State of Oregon.

Opinion:
Affirmed. Brooks v. Dierker, 275 Or 619, 552 P2d 533 (1976).
FORT, J.