Case Name: Michael D. HURST, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2009-02-17
Citations: 276 S.W.3d 905
Docket Number: No. ED 91650
Parties: Michael D. HURST, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 276
Pages: 905–906

Head Matter:
Michael D. HURST, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 91650.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Feb. 17, 2009.
Michael D. Hurst, Bowling Green, pro se.
Chris Koster, Jamie Pamela Rasmussen, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Michael D. Hurst ("movant") appeals the judgment of the trial court denying his motion to reopen his Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15 post-conviction proceeding based on allegations of abandonment of post-conviction counsel. Movant claims post-conviction counsel abandoned him, and therefore, he is entitled to reopen the proceedings.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for them information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).