Case Name: Raul H. PEREZ, Appellant, v. Hugh S. UNGER, M.D., et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-01-21
Citations: 591 So. 2d 1154
Docket Number: No. 91-802
Parties: Raul H. PEREZ, Appellant, v. Hugh S. UNGER, M.D., et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before JORGENSON, GERSTEN and GODERICH, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 591
Pages: 1154–1154

Head Matter:
Raul H. PEREZ, Appellant, v. Hugh S. UNGER, M.D., et al., Appellees.
No. 91-802.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan. 21, 1992.
Raul H. Perez, in pro. per.
Parenti & Falk and Norman M. Waas, George, Hartz, Lundeen & Flagg and Esther E. Galicia, Miami, for appellees.
Before JORGENSON, GERSTEN and GODERICH, JJ.

Opinion:
CORRECTED OPINION
PER CURIAM.
In a previous appeal, the plaintiff represented to this court that he would "adhere to the requirements for the prosecution of his case." See Perez v. Unger, 571 So.2d 67 (Fla.3d DCA 1990). In addition, the plaintiff was warned that the action would be dismissed if he did not meet the requirements.
Accordingly, we affirm. See Arango v. Alvarez, 585 So.2d 1131 (Fla.3d DCA 1991).
Affirmed.