Case Name: DANIEL ALLEN, APPELLANT, v. C. FRANKLIN WILSON, JUDGE, ETC., RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1927-10-17
Citations: 104 N.J.L. 163
Docket Number: 
Parties: DANIEL ALLEN, APPELLANT, v. C. FRANKLIN WILSON, JUDGE, ETC., RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 104
Pages: 163–163

Head Matter:
DANIEL ALLEN, APPELLANT, v. C. FRANKLIN WILSON, JUDGE, ETC., RESPONDENT.
Argued May 17, 1927
Decided October 17, 1927.
For the appellant, Elmer 17. Bornine.
For the respondent, Charles A. Bathbun.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Parker, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 11.
For reversal — Kone.