Case Name: The Swedesboro National Bank v. John C. Richman et al.
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1922-02-09
Citations: 93 N.J. Eq. 502
Docket Number: 
Parties: The Swedesboro National Bank v. John C. Richman et al.
Judges: For affirmance — The Ci-iief-Justice, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzbnbach, Williams, Gardner, Ackersoií, Van Buskirk — 13.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 93
Pages: 502–502

Head Matter:
The Swedesboro National Bank v. John C. Richman et al.
[Decided February 9th, 1922.]
On appeal from chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Backes, whose opinion is reported in 92 N. J. Eq. 8f\6.
Mr. Jomes Mercer Davis, for tire complainant.
Mr. Joseph J. Swnmerill, for the defendants.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed, by Vice-Chancellor Backes in the court below.
For affirmance — The Ci-iief-Justice, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzbnbach, Williams, Gardner, Ackersoií, Van Buskirk — 13.
For reversal — None.