Case Name: Percy Lee CLAY; Diane Clay, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Commissioner; Un-Named Revenue Officers, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-10-25
Citations: 399 F. App'x 788
Docket Number: No. 10-1456
Parties: Percy Lee CLAY; Diane Clay, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Commissioner; Un-Named Revenue Officers, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 399
Pages: 788–789

Head Matter:
Percy Lee CLAY; Diane Clay, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Commissioner; Un-Named Revenue Officers, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 10-1456.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 19, 2010.
Decided: Oct. 25, 2010.
Percy Lee Clay and Diane Clay, Appellants Pro Se. Teresa E. McLaughlin, Laurie Allyn Snyder, United States Department of Justice, Tax Division, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Percy Lee Clay and Diane Clay appeal the district court's orders dismissing, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, their action challenging their federal income tax liability, as well as their motions for reconsideration and recusal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Clay v. Internal Rev. Serv., No. 1:08-cv-00681-WO-PTS, 2009 WL 3391577 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 19, 2009); 2010 WL 4489368 (Mar. 18, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.