Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. John ARMSTEAD III, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2016-02-09
Citations: 481 S.W.3d 603
Docket Number: No. ED 102169
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. John ARMSTEAD III, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before Lisa S. Van'Amburg, C.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 481
Pages: 603–603

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. John ARMSTEAD III, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 102169
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
Filed: February 9, 2016
Karen L. Kramer, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 66102, for Plaintiff/Respondent.
Samuel E. Buffaloe, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65208, for Defendant/Appellant.
Before Lisa S. Van'Amburg, C.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.

Opinion:
ORDER-
PER CURIAM.
John Armstead III (Appellant) appeals from the trial court's judgment entered after a jury trial convicting him of robbery in the first degree and armed criminal action. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the State presented sufficient evidence to support the trial court's judgment. State v. Almaguer, 347 S.W.3d 636, 639 (Mo.App.E.D. 2011). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).