Case Name: George H. WIDNER, Appellant, v. Roy G. TELLIER and William Hoskins, Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1925-06-01
Citations: 5 F.2d 1010
Docket Number: Patent Appeal. No. 1741
Parties: George H. WIDNER, Appellant, v. Roy G. TELLIER and William Hoskins, Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 5
Pages: 1010–1010

Head Matter:
George H. WIDNER, Appellant, v. Roy G. TELLIER and William Hoskins, Appellees.
(Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.
Submitted May 12, 1925.
Decided June 1, 1925.)
Patent Appeal. No. 1741.
J. E. Stryker, of St. Paul, Minn., and A. V. Cush-man, of Washington, D. C., for appellant.
J. H. Lee, of Chicago, Ill., R. F. Steward and N. J. Jewett, both of Washington, D. C., and J. Q. Rice and M. C. Massie, both of New York City, for appellees.
Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB and VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justices.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is one of the series of interferences mentioned in Prather, v. Tellier, appeal No. 1742, just decided, — App. D. C. —, 5 F.(2d) 1010, and was disposed of on the same testimony and with the same result below. As we have adopted the reasoning and conclusion of the Patent Office in appeal No. 1742, it follows that the decision here must also be affirmed. Affirmed.