Case Name: VICKERS et al. v. CITY OF GAINESVILLE et al.
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1933-10-13
Citations: 177 Ga. 793
Docket Number: No. 9496
Parties: VICKERS et al. v. CITY OF GAINESVILLE et al.
Judges: All the Justices concur.
Reporter: Georgia Reports
Volume: 177
Pages: 793–794

Head Matter:
VICKERS et al. v. CITY OF GAINESVILLE et al.
No. 9496.
October 13, 1933.
Joseph H. Blaclcshear, for plaintiffs.
Herbert R. JEdmondson and W. Paries Martin Jr., for defendants.

Opinion:
Bussell, C. J.
The petition prayed for an injunction to prevent the defendants from enforcing, as to the plaintiffs, an ordinance of the City of Gainesville, requiring payment of a tax for conducting the business of undertaking in the city. Upon interlocutory hearing the evidence was conflicting as to whether the plaintiffs carried on the business of undertaking within the limits of that city. The court refused an injunction. The case falls within the well-settled rule of this court, that the discretion of the trial judge in granting or refusing an injunction will not be interfered with, unless there is a manifest abuse of discretion.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.