Case Name: Ray Autry ADKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1974-06-07
Citations: 295 So. 2d 120
Docket Number: No. 73-916
Parties: Ray Autry ADKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: HOBSON, A. C. J., and BOARDMAN and GRIMES, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 295
Pages: 120–121

Head Matter:
Ray Autry ADKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 73-916.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
June 7, 1974.
Rehearing Denied June 21, 1974.
James A. Gardner, Public Defender, Sarasota, and Robert T. Benton, II, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard C. Booth, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have carefully reviewed the points raised on appeal by appellant, Ray Autry Adkins, and after due consideration find them to be without merit. In arriving at this conclusion, we adhere to this court's previous opinion rendered in Chester v. State, Fla.App.2nd, 1973, 276 So.2d 76. This decision is rendered without prejudice to the appellant to raise the question of the ineffectiveness of his counsel in the trial court under Rule 3.850, CrPR, 33 F.S.A. Accordingly, we
Affirm.
HOBSON, A. C. J., and BOARDMAN and GRIMES, JJ., concur.