Case Name: Vincent ALLEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2005-12-21
Citations: 915 So. 2d 1292
Docket Number: No. 1D05-3854
Parties: Vincent ALLEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: WEBSTER, BROWNING and POLSTON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 915
Pages: 1292–1292

Head Matter:
Vincent ALLEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D05-3854.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Dec. 21, 2005.
Appellant, pro se.
Charlie Crist, Attorney General; Felicia A. Wilcox, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellant challenges the trial court's summary denial of his postconviction motion attacking the legality of his sentence. The appellant claims his sentence is illegal because he was habitualized for possession of a controlled substance with the intent to sell, which is not authorized for violations of section 893.13, Florida Statutes (1998), which relates to possession or purchase of a controlled substance. Brown v. State, 744 So.2d 1184 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). As the State concedes, the trial court did not attach record portions refuting the appellant's claim. We accordingly reverse the trial court's summary denial of the appellant's motion and remand for the trial court to either attach record portions to conclusively refute the appellant's claim or grant relief.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
WEBSTER, BROWNING and POLSTON, JJ., concur.