Case Name: F. Stephen SERZAN et al. v. ZONING BOARD OF REVIEW OF CITY OF NEWPORT
Court: Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Jurisdiction: Rhode Island
Decision Date: 1980-12-11
Citations: 425 A.2d 85
Docket Number: No. 80-385-Appeal
Parties: F. Stephen SERZAN et al. v. ZONING BOARD OF REVIEW OF CITY OF NEWPORT.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 425
Pages: 85–85

Head Matter:
F. Stephen SERZAN et al. v. ZONING BOARD OF REVIEW OF CITY OF NEWPORT.
No. 80-385-Appeal.
Supreme Court of Rhode Island.
Dec. 11, 1980.
Ralph J. Gonnella, Ltd., Providence, for plaintiff.
James S. O’Brien, Newport, for defendant.

Opinion:
ORDER
This case came before us on December 3, 1980 on the plaintiffs' motion to dismiss defendant's appeal. Upon consideration of the arguments presented that the method of review sought by defendant board is inappropriate and in view of our decision in A. T. & G., Inc. v. Zoning Board of Review, 113 R.I. 458, 322 A.2d 294 (1974), we conclude that said motion has merit.
Therefore, the plaintiffs' motion to dismiss this appeal is hereby granted.