Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Scott NJOS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-12-30
Citations: 358 F. App'x 725
Docket Number: No. 09-1957
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Scott NJOS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge, and JOHN DANIEL TINDER, Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 358
Pages: 725–725

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Scott NJOS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-1957.
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 29, 2009.
Decided Dec. 30, 2009.
Michael F. Iasparro, Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Rockford, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Daniel A. Mengeling, Attorney, Woodstock, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge, and JOHN DANIEL TINDER, Circuit Judge.
This successive appeal has been submitted to the original panel under Operating Procedure 6(b). After examining the briefs and the record, we have concluded that oral argument is unnecessary. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); Cir. R. 34(f).

Opinion:
Order
The judgment of the district court is vacated, and the case is remanded with instructions to reconsider in light of the position taken in the United States' brief.