Case Name: CRAM v. SPRINGER LITHOGRAPHING CO.
Court: New York City Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1894-10-23
Citations: 30 N.Y.S. 1130
Docket Number: 
Parties: CRAM v. SPRINGER LITHOGRAPHING CO.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 30
Pages: 1130–1130

Head Matter:
CRAM v. SPRINGER LITHOGRAPHING CO.
(City Court of New York, General Term.
October 23, 1894.)
Action by Ella Cram against the Springer Lithographing Company. Boothby & Warren, for appellant. Kellogg, Rose & Smith, for respondent.

Opinion:
EHRLICH, C. J.
The evidence seems to bring the case within the ruling of the court in Haynes v. Aldrich, 133 N. Y. 287, 31 N. E. 94, and justifies the •verdict rendered. There is no evidence warranting a ¡finding that any surrender by the landlord had been .accepted; hence there was nothing to go to the jury. We find no error, and the judgment appealed from •must be affirmed, with costs.