Case Name: S.D., Appellant, v. C.A.T., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-07-12
Citations: 761 So. 2d 1242
Docket Number: No. 2D99-1543
Parties: S.D., Appellant, v. C.A.T., Appellee.
Judges: PARKER, A.C.J., and WHATLEY and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 761
Pages: 1242–1242

Head Matter:
S.D., Appellant, v. C.A.T., Appellee.
No. 2D99-1543.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
July 12, 2000.
Karol K. Williams and Allison M. Perry, Tampa (withdrew after briefing); Edward J. Page and Robert E. Biasotti of Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith & Cutler, P.A., St. Petersburg (substituted as counsel of record), for Appellant.
Sharon L. Tavares and Raymond A. Ta-vares, Tampa, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this paternity action, S.D. challenges the trial court's order granting summary judgment in favor of the mother, C.A.T. In his brief, S.D. argued that summary judgment was improper because disputed issues of material fact existed concerning whether he was, in fact, the biological father of the child. We now have the results of DNA testing, which establish that the probability that S.D. is the biological father of the child is 99.9999 percent. Therefore, we affirm the summary judgment in favor of C.A.T. Our opinion on this issue renders S.D.'s remaining challenges to the trial court's orders moot.
Affirmed.
PARKER, A.C.J., and WHATLEY and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.
. The DNA test results were furnished to this court during the pendency of this appeal.