Case Name: Nathaniel J. STEPHENS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-08-23
Citations: 169 S.W.3d 580
Docket Number: No. WD 64359
Parties: Nathaniel J. STEPHENS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before SMART, P.J., HOLLIGER and HARDWICK, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 169
Pages: 580–580

Head Matter:
Nathaniel J. STEPHENS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 64359.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Aug. 23, 2005.
Ruth Sanders, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant.
Deborah Daniels, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before SMART, P.J., HOLLIGER and HARDWICK, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Nathaniel Stephens appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. Upon review of the parties' briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value. Rule 84.16(b).