Case Name: In the Matter of the Compensation of James M. King, Claimant. James M. KING, Petitioner, v. BUILDING SUPPLY DISCOUNT and SAIF Corporation, Respondents
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1996-01-17
Citations: 138 Or. App. 520
Docket Number: WCB 93-0400M; CA A84939
Parties: In the Matter of the Compensation of James M. King, Claimant. James M. KING, Petitioner, v. BUILDING SUPPLY DISCOUNT and SAIF Corporation, Respondents.
Judges: Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Hasel-ton, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 138
Pages: 520–520

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted December 8, 1995,
reversed and remanded for reconsideration January 17, 1996
In the Matter of the Compensation of James M. King, Claimant. James M. KING, Petitioner, v. BUILDING SUPPLY DISCOUNT and SAIF Corporation, Respondents.
(WCB 93-0400M; CA A84939)
909 P2d 900
Michael A. Gilbertson argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.
Steve Cotton, Special Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.
Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Hasel-ton, Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Reversed and remanded for reconsideration. King v. Building Supply Discount, 133 Or App 179, 889 P2d 1310 (1995).