Case Name: Daniel L. SMALLWOOD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1994-04-06
Citations: 634 So. 2d 1109
Docket Number: No. 91-03100
Parties: Daniel L. SMALLWOOD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: DANAHY, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 634
Pages: 1109–1109

Head Matter:
Daniel L. SMALLWOOD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 91-03100.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
April 6, 1994.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Robert F. Moeller, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Johnny T. Salgado, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the convictions in this case. We affirm the sentences except for the following matters. We strike special condition of probation number 6 because it was not announced at sentencing. We instruct that the order of probation be corrected to reflect that the defendant was found guilty by the verdict of a jury. We reverse the order setting the amount of restitution because it was entered after the notice of appeal was filed. Skaggs v. State, 620 So.2d 1304 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). On remand, the trial court may reimpose the amount of restitution because it had reserved jurisdiction to do so. Id. See also State v. Sanderson, 625 So.2d 471 (Fla.1993) (holding that if order of restitution has been entered in timely manner, the court can determine the amount of restitution beyond the sixty-day period).
Affirmed in part; reversed in part.
DANAHY, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.