Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Kenneth A. WENFEEL, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-12-11
Citations: 387 S.W.3d 407
Docket Number: No. ED 98161
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Kenneth A. WENFEEL, Appellant.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J. and ROY L. RICHTER and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 387
Pages: 407–408

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Kenneth A. WENFEEL, Appellant.
No. ED 98161.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Dec. 11, 2012.
Susan Kister, Chesterfield, MO, for Appellant.
Chris A. Koster, Attorney General, Timothy A. Blackwell, Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J. and ROY L. RICHTER and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Kenneth Wenfeel ("Defendant") appeals from the judgment following his conviction on three counts of robbery in the first degree, Section 569.020, and three counts of armed criminal action, Section 571.015. Defendant alleges the trial court erred in overruling his motions for acquittal and new trial because the State failed to present sufficient evidence identifying Defendant as one of the two robbers.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).
. All statutory references are to RSMo 2000 unless otherwise noted.