Case Name: Donald Allan JACKSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1981-06-23
Citations: 400 So. 2d 173
Docket Number: No. 80-1105
Parties: Donald Allan JACKSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 400
Pages: 173–173

Head Matter:
Donald Allan JACKSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 80-1105.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
June 23, 1981.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Jesse J. McCray, Jr., Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Steven R. Jacob, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the conviction based on circumstantial evidence, see, e. g., Anderson v. State, 354 So.2d 395 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978), cert. denied, 359 So.2d 1210 (Fla.1978); Miller v. State, 270 So.2d 423 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972), cert. denied, 275 So.2d 16 (Fla.1973); Wright v. State, 269 So.2d 60 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972), cert. denied 274 So.2d 235 (Fla.1973), and uphold the jury finding that the evidence is inconsistent with any reasonable hypothesis of innocence. See, e. g., McArthur v. State, 351 So.2d 972 (Fla.1977); Diaz v. State, 387 So.2d 978 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).
Affirmed.