Case Name: THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. NICHOLAS MURDACA, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1905-12-06
Citations: 73 N.J.L. 679
Docket Number: 
Parties: THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. NICHOLAS MURDACA, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Judges: For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Dixon, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Reed, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Gray, Dill. 15.
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 73
Pages: 679–679

Head Matter:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. NICHOLAS MURDACA, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Argued December 5, 1905
Decided December 6, 1905.
On error to the Supreme Court.
Eor the plaintiff in error, Charles C. Blade.
For the defendant in error, William II. Speer, prosecutor of the pleas.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
An examination of the assignments of error and the bills of exceptions and the causes filed for reversal, and the entire record before us, discloses no ground for reversal.
The judgment will therefore be affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Dixon, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Reed, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Gray, Dill. 15.
For reversal — None.