Case Name: RANCHLANDS, INC., BERKELEY HOLDING, INC., AND PINELANDS RECYCLING, INC., NEW JERSEY CORPORATIONS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. TOWNSHIP OF STAFFORD, STAFFORD TOWNSHIP PLANNING BOARD AND THE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF STAFFORD, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1998-12-02
Citations: 156 N.J. 443
Docket Number: 
Parties: RANCHLANDS, INC., BERKELEY HOLDING, INC., AND PINELANDS RECYCLING, INC., NEW JERSEY CORPORATIONS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. TOWNSHIP OF STAFFORD, STAFFORD TOWNSHIP PLANNING BOARD AND THE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF STAFFORD, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 156
Pages: 443–444

Head Matter:
720 A.2d 339
RANCHLANDS, INC., BERKELEY HOLDING, INC., AND PINELANDS RECYCLING, INC., NEW JERSEY CORPORATIONS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. TOWNSHIP OF STAFFORD, STAFFORD TOWNSHIP PLANNING BOARD AND THE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF STAFFORD, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Argued October 27, 1998
Decided December 2, 1998.
Paul H. Schneider, argued the cause for appellants (Giordano, Halleran & Ciesla, attorneys; Michael J. Gross, of counsel).
Thomas E. Monahan, argued the cause for respondents Township of Stafford and Industrial Commission of the Township of Stafford (Gilmore & Monahan, attorneys; Jean K. Cipriani, on the brief).
Bradley W. Henson, Sr., argued the cause for respondent Stafford Township Planning Board.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge D'Annunzio's opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 305 N.J.Super. 528, 702 A.2d 1325 (1997).
For affirmance — Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, GARIBALDI, STEIN, and COLEMAN — 7.
Opposed — None.