Case Name: Christopher Eugene BUCKNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.; Teamsters Local 391, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-03-21
Citations: 641 F. App'x 262
Docket Number: No. 15-2304
Parties: Christopher Eugene BUCKNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.; Teamsters Local 391, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 641
Pages: 262–263

Head Matter:
Christopher Eugene BUCKNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.; Teamsters Local 391, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15-2304.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 17, 2016.
Decided: March 21, 2016.
Christopher Eugene Buckner, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Ballantine Molony, Alston & Bird, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina; Glenn G. Patton, Alston & Bird, LLP, Atlanta, Georgia; J. David James, Smith, James, Rowlett & Cohen, LLP, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Eugene Buckner filed a civil action in state court against United Parcel Service, Inc., and Teamsters Local 391, asserting various violations of North Carolina law. The district court determined that Buckner's claims were preempted under the Labor Management Relations Act and that removal to federal court was therefore proper. Buckner now appeals the district court's order accepting in part and denying in part the magistrate judge's recommendation, denying Buckner's' motion to remand, dismissing some claims with prejudice as barred by res judicata and the statute of limitations, and dismissing his remaining claims without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Buckner v. United Parcel Serv,, Inc., No. 5:14-cv-00539-FL, 2015 WL 5603369 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 23, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.