Case Name: The State ex rel. Koller, Appellant, v. Sutula, Judge, Appellee
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2012-08-30
Citations: 132 Ohio St. 3d 524
Docket Number: No. 2012-0434
Parties: The State ex rel. Koller, Appellant, v. Sutula, Judge, Appellee.
Judges: O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 132
Pages: 524–525

Head Matter:
The State ex rel. Koller, Appellant, v. Sutula, Judge, Appellee.
[Cite as State ex rel. Roller v. Sutula, 132 Ohio St.3d 524, 2012-Ohio-3834.]
(No. 2012-0434
Submitted August 22, 2012
Decided August 30, 2012.)

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the complaint of appellant, Kevin Koller, for writs of mandamus and procedendo to compel appellee, Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Judge Kathleen Ann Sutula, to enter a lawful sentence for him. "Neither mandamus nor procedendo will issue if the party seeking extraordinary relief has an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law." State ex rel. Hudson v. Sutula, 131 Ohio St.3d 177, 2012-Ohio-554, 962 N.E.2d 798, ¶ 1. Roller's allied-offense claims are nonjurisdictional and are not cognizable in an extraordinary-writ action, and Koller had an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law to raise his claims in an appeal from his sentencing entry. See State ex rel. Agosto v. Gallagher, 131 Ohio St.3d 176, 2012-Ohio-563, 962 N.E.2d 796, ¶ 3. Roller's double-jeopardy claim was also remediable by appeal rather than by extraordinary writ. See Hudson at ¶ 1.
Kevin Roller, pro se.
Judgment affirmed.
O'Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.