Case Name: M. G. CONLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1969-04-09
Citations: 221 So. 2d 9
Docket Number: No. 68-389
Parties: M. G. CONLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: LILES, C. J., and PIERCE and Mc-NULTY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 221
Pages: 9–9

Head Matter:
M. G. CONLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 68-389.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.
April 9, 1969.
Robert E. Jagger, Public Defender, and Joseph F. McDermott, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellant.
Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and William D.' Roth, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on authority of Morgan v. State (Fla.App.2d 1962), 142 So.2d 308 and Rohdin v. State (Fla.App.2d 1958), 105 So.2d 371.
This case is clearly distinguishable from Specht v. Patterson (1967), 386 U.S. 605, 87 S.Ct. 1209, 18 L.Ed.2d 326, and Townsend v. Burke (1948), 334 U.S. 736, 68 S.Ct. 1252, 92 L.Ed. 1690; and our decision is wholly consonant with Williams v. New York (1949), 337 U.S. 241, 69 S.Ct. 1079, 93 L.Ed. 1337.
LILES, C. J., and PIERCE and Mc-NULTY, JJ., concur.