Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Mingo, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2007-10-16
Citations: 9 N.Y.3d 938
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Mingo, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 9
Pages: 938–938

Head Matter:
[876 NE2d 507, 844 NYS2d 779]
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Mingo, Appellant.
Decided October 16, 2007
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Appellate Advocates, New York City (Lynn W.L. Fahey of counsel), for appellant.
Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York City (Fay Ng of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed. The Appellate Division, having affirmed without opinion, may have done so on the basis that the sentence imposed was not excessive, an issue beyond this Court's review.
Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.