Case Name: In the Matter of James Lee HARTLEY, Debtor. James Lee HARTLEY, Appellant, v. Rickey D. JONES, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1989-05-17
Citations: 874 F.2d 1254
Docket Number: No. 88-1839
Parties: In the Matter of James Lee HARTLEY, Debtor. James Lee HARTLEY, Appellant, v. Rickey D. JONES, Appellee.
Judges: Before LAY, Chief Judge, HENLEY, Senior Circuit Judge, and McMILLIAN, ARNOLD, JOHN R. GIBSON, FAGG, BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, MAGILL and BEAM, Circuit Judges, en banc.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 874
Pages: 1254–1254

Head Matter:
In the Matter of James Lee HARTLEY, Debtor. James Lee HARTLEY, Appellant, v. Rickey D. JONES, Appellee.
No. 88-1839.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted May 9, 1989.
Decided May 17, 1989.
Keith R. Krueger, Kansas City, Mo., for appellant.
Julia J. Borel, Kansas City, Mo., for ap-pellee.
Before LAY, Chief Judge, HENLEY, Senior Circuit Judge, and McMILLIAN, ARNOLD, JOHN R. GIBSON, FAGG, BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, MAGILL and BEAM, Circuit Judges, en banc.

Opinion:
The petition of appellee for rehearing en banc was granted, thereby vacating the panel opinion, and this case now has been reheard by the Court en banc. Judges John R. Gibson, Bowman, Wollman, Magill, and Beam vote to affirm the judgment of the District Court. Chief Judge Lay and Judges Henley, McMillian, Arnold, and Fagg vote to reverse that judgment. Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed by an equally divided Court.