Case Name: Jonas A. Malter, Appellant, v. New York Indemnity Company, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1928-05
Citations: 224 A.D. 704
Docket Number: 
Parties: Jonas A. Malter, Appellant, v. New York Indemnity Company, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 224
Pages: 704–704

Head Matter:
Jonas A. Malter, Appellant, v. New York Indemnity Company, Respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
While we think there was enough evidence to make the question of visible marks of forcible entry at the third window one of fact, we agree with the ultimate conclusion of the trial justice that as the trier of the facts he should direct a verdict for the defendant. The judgment appealed from should, therefore, be affirmed, with costs. Present—-Dowling, P. J., Finch, McAvoy, Martin and Proskauer, JJ. Judgment affirmed, with costs.