Case Name: BOLSTER, Appellant, v. MAYOR, ETC., OF CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1896-04-24
Citations: 38 N.Y.S. 1141
Docket Number: 
Parties: BOLSTER, Appellant, v. MAYOR, ETC., OF CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 38
Pages: 1141–1141

Head Matter:
BOLSTER, Appellant, v. MAYOR, ETC., OF CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department,
April 24, 1896.)
Action by Honora Bolster against the mayor, etc., of the city of New York. J. B. Hands, for appellant. T. Connoly, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This case is within the principle of Foley v. Mayor, etc., 1 App. Div. 586, 37 N. Y. Supp. 465, and should be affirmed on the authority of that case. In that case, as in this, the plaintiff had been examined under the authority of section 123 of the consolidation act; but the parol notice given at the time of that examination was not thought to be sufficient notice of the intention to sue, to permit a recovery. The same rule must be applied here. Judgment affirmed, with costs.