Case Name: Rory PURNELL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2009-03-10
Citations: 278 S.W.3d 737
Docket Number: No. ED 91362
Parties: Rory PURNELL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before NANNETTE A. BAKER, C.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and MARY K. HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 278
Pages: 737–737

Head Matter:
Rory PURNELL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 91362.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
March 10, 2009.
Scott Thompson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Robert J. (Jeff) Bartholomew, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before NANNETTE A. BAKER, C.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and MARY K. HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Rory Purnell, appeals from a judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).