Case Name: Bessie Taffel, Appellant, v. Murray W. Taffel, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1952-03-24
Citations: 279 A.D. 938
Docket Number: 
Parties: Bessie Taffel, Appellant, v. Murray W. Taffel, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 279
Pages: 938–938

Head Matter:
Bessie Taffel, Appellant, v. Murray W. Taffel, Respondent.

Opinion:
The record on appeal does not disclose whether the limitation of the fine to $180 was based on a finding that the arrears were not more than that, or whether the fine was limited to a portion of the arrears, in discretion. If based on a finding that the arrears were only $180, the finding would be incorrect, as undoubtedly based on a requirement to pay $10 a week and not $25 a week. (See Bartenbach V. Bartenbach, 271 App. Div. 799.) The issues upon which the several applications are based can best be determined in this matter after a hearing. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Wenzel and Schmidt, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 1024.]