Case Name: Sam Silfen, Appellant, v. United Whelan Corporation, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1967-03-07
Citations: 27 A.D.2d 808
Docket Number: 
Parties: Sam Silfen, Appellant, v. United Whelan Corporation, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 27
Pages: 808–808

Head Matter:
Sam Silfen, Appellant, v. United Whelan Corporation, Respondent.

Opinion:
— Order, entered on March 3, 1966, granting defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements to appellant, and motion denied. While this complaint is no model of an artful pleading, the allegations therein are sufficiently particular to apprise the court and the parties of the subject matter of the controversy. (Foley v. D'Agostino, 21 A D 2d 60.) The complaint sufficiently alleges breach of a retirement agreement and resulting damages. Concur — Botein, P. J., Eager, Capozzoli, Tilzer and McNally, JJ.