Case Name: J. Leonard Spodek, Appellant, v. Joshua Feibusch et al., Defendants. Godsberg, Zankel & Golden, P. C., Nonparty Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1999-03-22
Citations: 259 A.D.2d 693
Docket Number: 
Parties: J. Leonard Spodek, Appellant, v Joshua Feibusch et al., Defendants. Godsberg, Zankel & Golden, P. C., Nonparty Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 259
Pages: 693–693

Head Matter:
J. Leonard Spodek, Appellant, v Joshua Feibusch et al., Defendants. Godsberg, Zankel & Golden, P. C., Nonparty Respondent.
[687 NYS2d 171]

Opinion:
In an action, inter alia, for the dissolution of a partnership, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winslow, J.), dated December 31, 1997, which denied his motion to vacate a judgment in the amount of $18,658.10 in favor of the nonparty respondent Godsberg, Zankel & Golden, P. C., entered upon his default in opposing its motion to enforce its charging lien.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
A decision to vacate a prior order or judgment rests in the sound discretion of the court and will be upheld in the absence of an improvident exercise of that discretion (see, Matter of Ping Lee v City of New York, 233 AD2d 510). The court's discretion to relieve a party from a judgment should not be exercised where that party has demonstrated lack of good faith or has been dilatory in asserting his or her rights (see, Greenwich Sav. Bank v JAJ Carpet Mart, 126 AD2d 451). The record is replete with evidence of the plaintiffs lack of good faith and failure to timely assert his rights. Accordingly, it was not an improvident exercise of discretion for the Supreme Court to deny the plaintiffs motion to vacate the judgment. O'Brien, J. P., Ritter, Thompson and Joy, JJ., concur.