Case Name: The State, ex rel. Albright, Appellee, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio; Matlack, Inc., Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1992-06-03
Citations: 63 Ohio St. 3d 739
Docket Number: No. 90-2522
Parties: The State, ex rel. Albright, Appellee, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio; Matlack, Inc., Appellant.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 63
Pages: 739–740

Head Matter:
The State, ex rel. Albright, Appellee, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio; Matlack, Inc., Appellant.
[Cite as State, ex rel. Albright, v. Indus. Comm. (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 739.]
(No. 90-2522
Submitted February 11, 1992
Decided June 3, 1992.)
Gallon, Kalniz &. lorio Co., L.P.A., and Theodore A. Bowman, for appellee.
Schottenstein, Zox & Dunn Co., L.P.A., Robert D. Weisman and Corey V. Crognale, for appellant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The court of appeals correctly found that the commission's boilerplate recitation of nonmedical disability factors was insufficient. See State, ex rel. Noll, v. Indus. Comm. (1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 203, 567 N.E.2d 245. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.