Case Name: Ada Zona et al., Appellants, v. JELD-WEN, Inc., et al., Respondents. (Action No. 1.); Ada Zona et al., Appellants, v. JELD-WEN, Inc., et al., Respondents. (Action No. 2.)
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2007-03-29
Citations: 8 N.Y.3d 911
Docket Number: 
Parties: Ada Zona et al., Appellants, v JELD-WEN, Inc., et al., Respondents. (Action No. 1.) Ada Zona et al., Appellants, v JELD-WEN, Inc., et al., Respondents. (Action No. 2.)
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 8
Pages: 911–912

Head Matter:
[865 NE2d 1247, 834 NYS2d 81]
Ada Zona et al., Appellants, v JELD-WEN, Inc., et al., Respondents. (Action No. 1.) Ada Zona et al., Appellants, v JELD-WEN, Inc., et al., Respondents. (Action No. 2.)
Decided March 29, 2007
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Osborn, Reed & Burke, LLP, Rochester (Thomas J. Rzepka of counsel), for appellants.
Hodgson Russ LLP, Albany (Noreen DeWire Grimmick of counsel), for respondents.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (34 AD3d 1189 [2006]).
Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.