Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Kevin CRUMP, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-09-28
Citations: 144 S.W.3d 886
Docket Number: No. ED 83449
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Kevin CRUMP, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J. and LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 144
Pages: 886–887

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Kevin CRUMP, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 83449.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Sept. 28, 2004.
Craig A. Johnston, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Karen L. Kramer, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J. and LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Kevin Crump (Defendant) appeals from the trial court's judgment and sentence imposed after a jury found him guilty of: one count of first-degree robbery, in violation of Section 569.020; and one count of armed criminal action, in violation of Section 571.015. The trial court found Defendant to be a prior and persistent offender, subject to an extended term of imprisonment, and sentenced Defendant to thirty years on Count I and ten years on Count II, with both terms to be served concurrently.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would have no jurisprudential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
. All statutory references are to RSMo 2000, unless otherwise indicated.