Case Name: Robert C. WILLIAMS, Petitioner v. GEICO GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent; Geico Government Employees Insurance Company, Respondent v. Robert C. Williams, Petitioner
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2009-11-18
Citations: 986 A.2d 45
Docket Number: 
Parties: Robert C. WILLIAMS, Petitioner v. GEICO GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent. Geico Government Employees Insurance Company, Respondent v. Robert C. Williams, Petitioner.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 986
Pages: 45–45

Head Matter:
Robert C. WILLIAMS, Petitioner v. GEICO GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent. Geico Government Employees Insurance Company, Respondent v. Robert C. Williams, Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Nov. 18, 2009.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 18th day of November, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:
Whether, under the MVFRL and our decision in Burstein v. Prudential Property & Cas. Ins. Co., 570 Pa. 177, 809 A.2d 204 (2002), the "regular-use" exclusion to underinsured motorist coverage in an automobile insurance policy is valid where the insured is a police officer, who has sustained bodily injury in the course of performing his duties while driving a police vehicle, for which vehicle he could not have obtained underinsured motorist coverage.