Case Name: Richard SALES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1997-06-24
Citations: 947 S.W.2d 128
Docket Number: No. WD 53148
Parties: Richard SALES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before ELLIS, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and HOWARD, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 947
Pages: 128–128

Head Matter:
Richard SALES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 53148.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
June 24, 1997.
Jeannie Arterburn Willibey, Asst. Public Defender, Kansas City, for Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jill C. LaHue, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for Respondent.
Before ELLIS, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and HOWARD, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER curiam:.
Movant claims the trial court erred in denying his Rule 24,035 Motion because his plea lacked voluntariness in that he was unaware that in the event his probation was revoked, he would have to serve the full suspended sentence, and that his probation could be revoked for failure to follow a directive initiated by his probation officer. Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).