Case Name: LENSKE, Appellant, v. SHOBE, Sheriff, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1971-09-21
Citations: 6 Or. App. 472
Docket Number: 
Parties: LENSKE, Appellant, v. SHOBE, Sheriff, Respondent.
Judges: Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Foley and Thornton, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 6
Pages: 472–481

Head Matter:
Argued June 25, dismissed July 1, petition for rehearing denied, former opinion withdrawn,
affirmed September 21,
petition for review denied November 3, 1971
LENSKE, Appellant, v. SHOBE, Sheriff, Respondent.
486 P2d 580
488 P2d 852
Reuben Lenske, Portland, argued the canse and filed the briefs pro se for appellant.
George M. Joseph, Portland, argned the canse for respondent. On the brief were James L. Sutherland and Morrison & Bailey, Portland.
Reuben Lenske, in propria persona, for the petition.
No appearance contra.'
Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Foley and Thornton, Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff appeals from an adverse decision of the trial court in a claim and delivery proceeding which he brought against the sheriff of Clackamas County for the recovery of an automobile. In the course of oral argument before this court the plaintiff, appearing pro se, stated that since filing the action he had recovered possession of the automobile from the sheriff.
The appeal is therefore moot.
Appeal dismissed.