Case Name: Frank Ralph LA PENA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. George GRIGAS; et al., Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-10-18
Citations: 146 F. App'x 208
Docket Number: No. 04-16486; D.C. No. CV-00-00960-PMP
Parties: Frank Ralph LA PENA, Petitioner—Appellant, v. George GRIGAS; et al., Respondents—Appellees.
Judges: Before T.G. NELSON, WARDLAW, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 146
Pages: 208–209

Head Matter:
Frank Ralph LA PENA, Petitioner—Appellant, v. George GRIGAS; et al., Respondents—Appellees.
No. 04-16486.
D.C. No. CV-00-00960-PMP.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 11, 2005.
Decided Oct. 18, 2005.
Frank Ralph Lapena, Indian Springs, NV, pro se.
Victor H. Schulze, Office of the Nevada Attorney General, Las Vegas, NV, for Respondent-Appellee.
Before T.G. NELSON, WARDLAW, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Frank Ralph La Pena, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals the district court's July 7, 2004, order denying three motions. Because the district court's order was an interlocutory order not subject to immediate appellate review, and La Pena does not contend that any applicable exception to the final judgment rule applies, we dismiss this for lack of jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; see also United States v. Austin, 416 F.3d 1016, 1019 (9th Cir.2005). La Pena's motion to proceed in forma pauper-is is denied as moot.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.