Case Name: Akwasi SAWYER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2017-09-12
Citations: 527 S.W.3d 890
Docket Number: No. ED 104719
Parties: Akwasi SAWYER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 527
Pages: 890–891

Head Matter:
Akwasi SAWYER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 104719
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Filed: September 12, 2017
Andrew E. Zleit, 1010 .Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Mov-ant/Appellant.
Karen L. Kramer, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent/Respondent.
Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Akwasi Sawyer appeals from the motion court's judgment denying, following an evi-dentiary hearing, his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.15. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k), An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. 2011, unless otherwise indicated,