Case Name: Bernard J. HEHEMAN, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, Cross-Appellees, v. The E. W. SCRIPPS COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, and The Cincinnati Enquirer, A corporation organized under the laws of Ohio, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1982-01-07
Citations: 668 F.2d 878
Docket Number: Nos. 80-3017, 80-3024
Parties: Bernard J. HEHEMAN, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, Cross-Appellees, v. The E. W. SCRIPPS COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, and The Cincinnati Enquirer, A corporation organized under the laws of Ohio, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before ENGEL and MERRITT, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 668
Pages: 878–880

Head Matter:
Bernard J. HEHEMAN, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, Cross-Appellees, v. The E. W. SCRIPPS COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, and The Cincinnati Enquirer, A corporation organized under the laws of Ohio, Defendant-Appellee.
Nos. 80-3017, 80-3024.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Jan. 7, 1982.
Certiorari Denied May 24,1982.
See 102 S.Ct. 2272.
John A. Lloyd, Jr., Barbara Bison Ford, Stanley M. Chesley, Michael Boylan, Cincinnati, Ohio, for plaintiffs-appellants, crossappellees.
James W. Hengelbrok, Davis, Hengelbrok & Sachs, Cincinnati, Ohio, John R. Ferguson, Jeffrey N. Martin, Janine H. Coward, Myron L. Dale, Washington, D. C., James P. Garner, Baker & Hostetler, Cleveland, Ohio, J. Mack Swigert, Taft, Stettinius & Hollister, Roger Weber, Cincinnati, Ohio, Charles T. Price, Cleveland, Ohio, Roger D. Staton, McIntosh, McIntosh & Knabe, Paul R. Rein ers, Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendant-appellee, cross-appellant.
Ronald Rosenberg, George Driesen, Jeffrey Freund, Van Arkel, Kaiser, Gressman, Rosenberg & Driesen, Washington, D. C., for amicus curiae AFL-CIO.
Frank M. Northam, Hanson, O’Brien, Birney & Butler, Washington, D. C., for amicus curiae Newspaper Publishers Ass’n.
Before ENGEL and MERRITT, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
A majority of the Court having not voted in favor of an en banc rehearing, the petition for rehearing has been referred to the hearing panel for disposition.
Upon consideration, it is ORDERED that the petition for rehearing be and hereby is denied, 661 F.2d 1115 (6th Cir.).