Case Name: John B. De Lotto and Mary De Lotto, his wife, appellants, v. William Zipper, respondent
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1936-05-14
Citations: 120 N.J. Eq. 339
Docket Number: 
Parties: John B. De Lotto and Mary De Lotto, his wife, appellants, v. William Zipper, respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 120
Pages: 339–339

Head Matter:
John B. De Lotto and Mary De Lotto, his wife, appellants, v. William Zipper, respondent.
[Submitted October 25th, 1935.
Decided May 14th, 1936.]
Mr. Nicholas Martini, for the appellants.
Mr. Max P. Arlt and Mr. Addison P. Rosenkrans, for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The bill of complaint filed in this cause was dismissed after hearing on the merits. It should have been dismissed on the ground that the court of chancery was without jurisdiction to entertain the bill, and this for the reasons expressed in the opinion filed by Mr. Justice Bodine in this court in the case of Red Oaks, Inc., v. Dorez, Inc., 120 N. J. Eq. 282.
Upon the latter ground the decree is affirmed.
For affirmance — Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Peeskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 10.
For reversal — The Chief-Justice, Heher, JJ. 2.