Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael STACEY, a/k/a Sadat, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-09-16
Citations: 332 F. App'x 858
Docket Number: No. 09-7267
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael STACEY, a/k/a Sadat, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 332
Pages: 858–858

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael STACEY, a/k/a Sadat, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-7267.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 10, 2009.
Decided: Sept. 16, 2009.
Michael Stacey, Appellant Pro Se. Keith Michael Cave, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Ap-pellee.
Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael Stacey appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Stacey, No. 3:03-cr-00134-GCM-4 (W.D.N.C. June 29, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.