Case Name: Lloyd L. SHENEMAN and Florence Sheneman, Appellants, v. The CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, a municipality existing under the laws of the State of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1963-08-30
Citations: 156 So. 2d 415
Docket Number: No. 3756
Parties: Lloyd L. SHENEMAN and Florence Sheneman, Appellants, v. The CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, a municipality existing under the laws of the State of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: KANNER, Acting C. J., SHANNON, J., and MOODY, JAMES S., Associate Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 156
Pages: 415–416

Head Matter:
Lloyd L. SHENEMAN and Florence Sheneman, Appellants, v. The CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, a municipality existing under the laws of the State of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3756.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.
Aug. 30, 1963.
Rehearing Denied Sept. 30, 1963.
Elliott B. Barnett, of Ruden, Barnett & McClosky, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.
Richard J. Cory, of Ross, Norman & Cory, and Ronald B. Sladon, Fort Lauder-dale, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Middleton v. City of Fort Walton Beach, Fla.App.1959, 113 So.2d 431; Thompson v. City of Jacksonville,. Fla.App.1961, 130 So.2d 105, certiorari de nied Fla., 147 So.2d 530; and Gordon v. City of Belle Glade, Fla.App.1961, 132 So. 2d 449.
KANNER, Acting C. J., SHANNON, J., and MOODY, JAMES S., Associate Judge, concur.