Case Name: CARL J. RAHM, APPELLANT, v. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY ET AL., RESPONDENTS
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1936-10-02
Citations: 117 N.J.L. 149
Docket Number: 
Parties: CARL J. RAHM, APPELLANT, v. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 117
Pages: 149–149

Head Matter:
CARL J. RAHM, APPELLANT, v. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Argued June 2, 1936
Decided October 2, 1936.
Por the appellant, Joseph T. Lieblich.
Por the respondents, Arthur T. Vanderbilt.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.