Case Name: MOTOR FINANCE CO. v. HUNTSBERGER
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1926-08-04
Citations: 4 Ohio Law Abs. 738
Docket Number: No. 20044
Parties: MOTOR FINANCE CO. v. HUNTSBERGER
Judges: 
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 4
Pages: 738–738

Head Matter:
MOTOR FINANCE CO. v. HUNTSBERGER
No. 20044.
Supreme Court
Dock. Aug. 4, 1926;
4 Abs. 541.
Attorneys — Amerman & Mills, Canton, for Company.

Opinion:
The Automobile Finance Company contends in the Supreme Court that it may recover upon notes purchased before maturity, given in payment of specified model of automobile to be delivered in future, even though specified model was^not delivered and another model was, which purchaser accepted but contends was for temporary use only.