Case Name: D. MICHAEL HYDE, and wife, DINA M. HYDE v. CHESNEY GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 2000-10-06
Citations: 352 N.C. 665
Docket Number: No. 247A00
Parties: D. MICHAEL HYDE, and wife, DINA M. HYDE v. CHESNEY GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
Judges: Justice Parker did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
Reporter: North Carolina Reports
Volume: 352
Pages: 665–665

Head Matter:
D. MICHAEL HYDE, and wife, DINA M. HYDE v. CHESNEY GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
No. 247A00
(Filed 6 October 2000)
Deeds— restrictive covenants — architectural review committee — above-ground pool — unreasonable denial
The decision of the Court of Appeals in this case is reversed for the reason stated in the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals that a subdivision architectural review committee unreasonably withheld approval of plaintiffs’ application for permission to construct an above-ground swimming pool where it failed to give plaintiffs notice of valid reasons why the application was denied.
Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 137 N.C. App. 605, 529 S.E.2d 499 (2000), affirming a judgment entered 15 September 1998 and orders signed 15 January 1999 by Morgan (Michael R.), J., in District Court, Wake County. Heard in the Supreme Court 14 September 2000.
Levine & Stewart, by Michael D. Levine, for plaintiff-appellants.
Jordan Price Wall Gray Jones & Carlton, PLLC, by Henry W. Jones, Jr., and Hope Derby Carmichael, for defendant-appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed for the reasons stated in Judge Hunter's dissenting opinion.
REVERSED.
Justice Parker did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.