Case Name: The State ex rel. Baker, Appellant, v. Schiemann, Appellee
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1993-10-13
Citations: 67 Ohio St. 3d 443
Docket Number: No. 93-908
Parties: The State ex rel. Baker, Appellant, v. Schiemann, Appellee.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 67
Pages: 443–444

Head Matter:
The State ex rel. Baker, Appellant, v. Schiemann, Appellee.
[Cite as State ex rel. Baker v. Schiemann (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 443.]
(No. 93-908
Submitted July 28, 1993
Decided October 13, 1993.)
Saul P. Baker, M.D., pro se.
Jeffrey J. Schiemann, pro se.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. The trial court has ordered the relief appellant seeks. If he is dissatisfied, he may appeal. Mandamus is not a substitute for appeal. State ex rel. Pressley v. Indus. Comm. (1967), 11 Ohio St.2d 141, 40 O.O.2d 141, 228 N.E.2d 631, paragraph three of the syllabus.
Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.