Case Name: HENRY RANKIN ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. AUGUST INGWERSEN, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1887-03
Citations: 49 N.J.L. 481
Docket Number: 
Parties: HENRY RANKIN ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. AUGUST INGWERSEN, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
Judges: For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Magie, Parker, Reed, Scudder, Yan Syckel, Brown, Clement, Cole, McGregor, Whitaker. 12.
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 49
Pages: 481–481

Head Matter:
HENRY RANKIN ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. AUGUST INGWERSEN, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
Error to the Supreme Court.
For the plaintiffs in error, .John Linn.
For the defendant in error, W. A. Lewis and J. L. Bedle.

Opinion:
The Chancellor.
The charge in this case was in accordance with the decision of the Supreme Court, upon the rule to show cause why the first verdict should not be set aside and a new trial ordered. Ingwersen v. Rankin, 18 Vroom 18. I concur in the views there expressed by that court, and therefore am of opinion that there is no error in the record before us. The judgment should be affirmed.