Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Raymond O'Keefe, Antonio Romeo, Louis Dimbro, Joseph Banovic, Alias " Bingo Joe ", Keiser Joseph, Alias " Mushy Keiser ", Demetrius Saraceno, Sidney Goodsite, Alias " Shimmy ", Martin Mondolfi, Louis Fiato, and Joseph Capalaces, Appellants, et al., Defendants
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1954-01-21
Citations: 306 N.Y. 744
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Raymond O’Keefe, Antonio Romeo, Louis Dimbro, Joseph Banovic, Alias “ Bingo Joe ”, Keiser Joseph, Alias “ Mushy Keiser ”, Demetrius Saraceno, Sidney Goodsite, Alias “ Shimmy ”, Martin Mondolfi, Louis Fiato, and Joseph Capalaces, Appellants, et al., Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 306
Pages: 744–745

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Raymond O’Keefe, Antonio Romeo, Louis Dimbro, Joseph Banovic, Alias “ Bingo Joe ”, Keiser Joseph, Alias “ Mushy Keiser ”, Demetrius Saraceno, Sidney Goodsite, Alias “ Shimmy ”, Martin Mondolfi, Louis Fiato, and Joseph Capalaces, Appellants, et al., Defendants.
Submitted January 4, 1954;
decided January 21, 1954.

Opinion:
Motion for reargument denied.
Motion for amendment of the remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested, and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Questions under the Federal Constitution were presented and necessarily passed upon by the Court of Appeals, viz.: as to whether the rights of the defendants to due process under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal Constitution were violated by certain communications between the County Judge and jurors, and by refusal of the County Court to grant to defendant O'Keefe a further adjournment of the trial. The Court of Appeals held that there was no denial of any constitutional right of any defendant. [See 306 N. Y. 619.]