Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel MEI, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-02-05
Citations: 86 F. App'x 725
Docket Number: No. 02-20985
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel MEI, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 86
Pages: 725–725

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel MEI, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-20985.
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Feb. 5, 2004.
James Lee Turner, Assistant US Attorney, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Kent A. Schaffer, Bires & Schaffer, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Daniel Mei appeals from his guilty-plea conviction for conducting a monetary transaction with criminally derived property. He argues on appeal that the district court erred by increasing his sentence by three offense levels pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3Bl.l(b). However, as noted by the Government, Mei's instant argument is barred by the appeal-waiver provision contained in his written plea agreement.
Although the Government asserted the appeal waiver in its brief, defense counsel did not file a reply brief. He has therefore failed to address the threshold issue before this court. However, as the record shows that Mei's waiver of his right to appeal was knowing and voluntary, that waiver should be enforced as valid. See United States v. Melancon, 972 F.2d 566, 567-68 (5th Cir.1992). Accordingly, Mei's instant appeal is DISMISSED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.