Case Name: Boyd R. RINGHISER, Appellant, v. The CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1956-12-19
Citations: 241 F.2d 416
Docket Number: No. 12898
Parties: Boyd R. RINGHISER, Appellant, v. The CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 241
Pages: 416–416

Head Matter:
Boyd R. RINGHISER, Appellant, v. The CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellee.
No. 12898.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
Dec. 19, 1956.
Alex S. Dombey, Willi C. Richard Grieser, Col appellant. iam A. Richards, umbus, Ohio, for
Wilson & Rector, Col appellee. umbus, Ohio, for
Before MARTIN, M' MILLER, Circuit Judgbi pALLISTER and s.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel for appellant, the court havi mission to counsel for mit its case on the brief being duly advised, ing granted per-appellee to sub-f; and the court
Now, therefore, it is o rdered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be and i£ hereby affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Cecil, sustaining appellee's motion for judgment notwithstanding verdict. 148 F.Supp. 529.