Case Name: Luecretia Dawn OWENS-EL, f/k/a Luecretia Dawn McNair-Bey; Che' Quadaffi Williams-El, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Lieutenant KAPFHAMMER; George Githara, Officer; Christian V. Kaikai, Officer; Joseph Landsman, Defendants-Appellees, and John Doe # 1; John Doe # 2; John Doe #3; John Doe #4; John Doe #5; John Doe # 6, Office all of and from the Western District Police Station for the Baltimore City Police Department; D.M. Ross, Sergeant, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-11-25
Citations: 547 F. App'x 216
Docket Number: No. 13-1474
Parties: Luecretia Dawn OWENS-EL, f/k/a Luecretia Dawn McNair-Bey; Che’ Quadaffi Williams-El, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Lieutenant KAPFHAMMER; George Githara, Officer; Christian V. Kaikai, Officer; Joseph Landsman, Defendants-Appellees, and John Doe # 1; John Doe # 2; John Doe #3; John Doe #4; John Doe #5; John Doe # 6, Office all of and from the Western District Police Station for the Baltimore City Police Department; D.M. Ross, Sergeant, Defendants.
Judges: Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 547
Pages: 216–216

Head Matter:
Luecretia Dawn OWENS-EL, f/k/a Luecretia Dawn McNair-Bey; Che’ Quadaffi Williams-El, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Lieutenant KAPFHAMMER; George Githara, Officer; Christian V. Kaikai, Officer; Joseph Landsman, Defendants-Appellees, and John Doe # 1; John Doe # 2; John Doe #3; John Doe #4; John Doe #5; John Doe # 6, Office all of and from the Western District Police Station for the Baltimore City Police Department; D.M. Ross, Sergeant, Defendants.
No. 13-1474.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 21, 2013.
Decided: Nov. 25, 2013.
Luecretia Dawn Owens-El, Che’ Quadaffi Williams-El, Appellants Pro Se. Michael Lawrence Marshall, Schlachman, Belsky & Weiner, PA, Baltimore, Maryland; Suzanne Sangree, Baltimore City Law Department, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Luecretia Dawn Owens-El and Che' Quadaffi Williams-El appeal the district court's order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Owens-El v. Kapfhammer, No. l:10-cv-03213-JFM, 2013 WL 951734 (D.Md. filed Mar. 8, 2013, entered Mar. 11, 2013; Aug. 22, 2012; filed May 13, 2011, entered May 16, 2011). We grant the motion for an extension of time, deny the motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.