Case Name: In re: Brian Keith BREVARD, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-10-15
Citations: 112 F. App'x 264
Docket Number: No. 04-7336
Parties: In re: Brian Keith BREVARD, Petitioner.
Judges: Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 112
Pages: 264–265

Head Matter:
In re: Brian Keith BREVARD, Petitioner.
No. 04-7336.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 7, 2004.
Decided Oct. 15, 2004.
Brian Keith Brevard, Petitioner pro se.
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Brian Keith Brevard petitions for writ of mandamus. He seeks an order directing the district court to perform its ministerial duties and consider his objections to his previously imposed criminal sentence.
Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. See In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir.1988). Further, mandamus is a drastic remedy and should only be used in extraordinary circumstances. See Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402, 96 S.Ct. 2119, 48 L.Ed.2d 725 (1976); In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir.1987). Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. See In re United Steelworkers, 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir.1979).
The relief sought by Brevard is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process,
PETITION DENIED