Case Name: In re SEMONS et al.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1906-02-01
Citations: 140 F. 989
Docket Number: No. 110
Parties: In re SEMONS et al.
Judges: Before LACOMBE, TOWNSEND, and COXE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter
Volume: 140
Pages: 989–989

Head Matter:
In re SEMONS et al.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
February 1, 1906.)
No. 110.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Henry Kuntz, for appellants.
F. M. Czaki, for appellee.
Before LACOMBE, TOWNSEND, and COXE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The bankrupt did not appeal from the order dismissing-his application for discharge. Such an order we held in Re Kuffler, 127 Fed. 125, 61 C. C. A. 259, was in substance an order denying discharge, and as such reviewable by appeal under Bankr. Act July'1, 1898, c. 541, § 25, 30 Stat. 553 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3432]. Having elected not to review such order by appeal, he should not be allowed to Question its validity as an order denying discharge. Order affirmed.