Case Name: John KARCZEWSKI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. K MOTORS, INC., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-07-10
Citations: 693 F. App'x 628
Docket Number: No. 15-55588
Parties: John KARCZEWSKI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. K MOTORS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before: GRABER, BYBEE, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 693
Pages: 628–629

Head Matter:
John KARCZEWSKI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. K MOTORS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 15-55588
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted February 6, 2017 Pasadena, California
Filed July 10, 2017
Russell Clive Handy, Esquire, Mark D. Potter, Esquire, Potter Handy LLP, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant
Jane A. Rheinheimer, Esquire, Rhein-heimer Smigliani, APC, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellee
Christopher Chen-Hsin Wang, Attorney, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division/Appellate Section, Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae United States of America
Before: GRABER, BYBEE, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes that this case is suitable for decision without oral argu ment. Fed, R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
We vacate the district court's dismissal of this action, and we remand for reconsideration in light of Karczewski v. DCH Mission Valley, LLC, No. 15-55633.
VACATED and REMANDED. Costs on appeal awarded to Plaintiff.
BYBEE, Circuit Judge,
acquiescing dubitante:
I acquiesce dubitante for the reasons articulated in my separate opinion in Karczewski v. DCH Mission Valley, LLC, No. 15-55633.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.