Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Donald M. DAVIS, Appellant; UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Raymond JACKSON, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1971-09-20
Citations: 447 F.2d 988
Docket Number: Nos. 26350, 26351
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Donald M. DAVIS, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Raymond JACKSON, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 447
Pages: 988–988

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Donald M. DAVIS, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Raymond JACKSON, Appellant.
Nos. 26350, 26351.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Sept. 20, 1971.
David M. Rothman (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant Donald M. Davis.
Sull Lawrence (argued), Beverly Hills, Cal., for appellant Raymond Jackson.
Elgin Edwards, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Robert L. Meyer, U. S. Atty., David Nissen, Chief, Crim.Div., J. Kent Steele, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff and appellee.
Before CHAMBERS, WEICK and CARTER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:.
The judgments of conviction are affirmed.
Harris v. New York, 401 U.S. 222, 91 S.Ct. 643, 28 L.Ed.2d 1, answers the point made under Mallory v. United States, 354 U.S. 449, 77 S.Ct. 1356, 1 L.Ed.2d 1479.
Other points we find without merit.