Case Name: Henry Jen LINDSEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Cole JETER, Warden, Federal Medical Center Fort Worth, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-06-21
Citations: 186 F. App'x 466
Docket Number: No. 05-10365
Parties: Henry Jen LINDSEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Cole JETER, Warden, Federal Medical Center Fort Worth, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 186
Pages: 466–466

Head Matter:
Henry Jen LINDSEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Cole JETER, Warden, Federal Medical Center Fort Worth, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 05-10365
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
June 21, 2006.
Henry Jen Lindsey, Fort Worth, TX, pro se.
Angie Lee Henson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, for Respondent-Appellee.
Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Henry Jen Lindsey, federal prisoner # 08239-002, appeals the dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. He argues that his sentence is invalid in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Lindsey's argument is directed toward a sentencing error; such an argument may not be brought under § 2241. See Padilla v. United States, 416 F.3d 424, 425-26 (5th Cir.2005). Lindsey's argument that he is entitled to proceed under § 2241 based on the savings clause of 28 U.S.C. § 2255 because relief under that section is "inadequate or ineffective" is unavailing. See id. at 427 (holding that a claim under Booker does not fit within the savings clause of § 2255). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.