Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lewis Moses BYRD, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-03-10
Citations: 416 F. App'x 256
Docket Number: No. 10-7610
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lewis Moses BYRD, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 416
Pages: 256–256

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lewis Moses BYRD, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-7610.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 28, 2011.
Decided: March 10, 2011.
Lewis Moses Byrd, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CTJRIAM:
Lewis Moses Byrd seeks to appeal the district court's order granting the Government's motion to file its response to his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2010) motion out of time and denying Byrd's motion to amend his § 2255 motion. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.s.c. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Byrd seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.