Case Name: Ignatzio GIULIANO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Warden FCI Williamsburg, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-03-09
Citations: 415 F. App'x 482
Docket Number: No. 10-7625
Parties: Ignatzio GIULIANO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Warden FCI Williamsburg, Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 415
Pages: 482–482

Head Matter:
Ignatzio GIULIANO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Warden FCI Williamsburg, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 10-7625.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 28, 2011.
Decided: March 9, 2011.
Ignatzio Giuliano, Appellant Pro Se.
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Ignatzio Giuliano, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2010) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Giuliano v. Warden, No. 6:10-cv-02485-MBS, 2010 WL 4637771 (D.S.C. Nov. 8, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.