Case Name: DOMENICO GHIDELA, APPELLANT, v. UNION OF MUTUAL HELP AMONG THE POPULATION OF ITALIAN LANGUAGE, RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1917-11-19
Citations: 91 N.J.L. 324
Docket Number: 
Parties: DOMENICO GHIDELA, APPELLANT, v. UNION OF MUTUAL HELP AMONG THE POPULATION OF ITALIAN LANGUAGE, RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 91
Pages: 324–325

Head Matter:
DOMENICO GHIDELA, APPELLANT, v. UNION OF MUTUAL HELP AMONG THE POPULATION OF ITALIAN LANGUAGE, RESPONDENT.
Submitted July 9, 1917
Decided November 19, 1917.
On appeal from the Supremo Court, in which the following per curiam was filed:
“No sufficient reason is presented why the resolution of the association expelling the prosecutor should be disturbed.
“We think the charge upon which he was tried and con victed was one which warranted expulsion under the constitution and by-laws of the association.
“We think, also, that the fact that the hearing of the charge was held on Sunday is not a sufficient reason for setting aside the resolution expelling prosecutor. He was admitted to the association on a Sunday, all its meetings have been held on Sundays, and the association is engaged in a charitable work such as is expressly excepted from the operation of our Vice and Immorality act. Comp. Stat., p. 5712; Pepin v. Society Jeani Baptiste, 54 All. Rep. 47.
“The proceedings brought up will be affirmed, with costs.”
For the appellant, A. Orestes Ciccarelli.
For the respondent, Henry Carless.

Opinion:
Pee Curiam.
The judgment under1 review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, JJ. 10.
For reversal — Hone.