Case Name: Hubert E. WHITNEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-09-21
Citations: 143 S.W.3d 759
Docket Number: No. WD 62531
Parties: Hubert E. WHITNEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before SPINDEN, P.J., HOLLIGER and HARDWICK, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 143
Pages: 759–759

Head Matter:
Hubert E. WHITNEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 62531.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Sept. 21, 2004.
Andrew A. Schroeder, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant.
Deborah Daniels, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before SPINDEN, P.J., HOLLIGER and HARDWICK, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Hubert Whitney appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion following an eviden-tiary hearing. Upon review of the record, we find no error and affirm the motion court's judgment. The parties have been provided with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value.
AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).