Case Name: PORTSIDE YACHT CLUB and Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, Appellants, v. SEMINOLE GLASS & MIRROR CO., INC., Appellee; PORTSIDE YACHT CLUB and Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, Appellants, v. DICAMILLO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, et al., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1985-04-10
Citations: 467 So. 2d 423
Docket Number: Nos. 84-533, 84-761, 84-876 and 84-1664
Parties: PORTSIDE YACHT CLUB and Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, Appellants, v. SEMINOLE GLASS & MIRROR CO., INC., Appellee. PORTSIDE YACHT CLUB and Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, Appellants, v. DICAMILLO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, et al., Appellee.
Judges: ANSTEAD, C.J., WALDEN, J., and CARLISLE, JAMES T., Associate Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 467
Pages: 423–424

Head Matter:
PORTSIDE YACHT CLUB and Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, Appellants, v. SEMINOLE GLASS & MIRROR CO., INC., Appellee. PORTSIDE YACHT CLUB and Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, Appellants, v. DICAMILLO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, et al., Appellee.
Nos. 84-533, 84-761, 84-876 and 84-1664.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
April 10, 1985.
Rehearing Denied May 10, 1985.
Stephen A. Rapp and Glenn D. Kelley of Gunster, Yoakley, Criser & Stewart, P.A., Palm Beach, for appellants.
Russell L. Forkey of Russell L. Forkey, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee Seminole Glass & Mirror Co., Inc.
Robert P. Frankel of Lapidus & Stettin, P.A., Miami, for appellee DiCamillo Const. Co.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We reverse and remand with directions that a new trial be conducted on all issues. We believe a new trial is necessary because we are uncertain that the trial court's decision was predicated on the correct principles of law or that the parties properly preserved their positions as to the issues now asserted on appeal.
ANSTEAD, C.J., WALDEN, J., and CARLISLE, JAMES T., Associate Judge, concur.