Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arthur B. AVERY, Sr., and Alisa D. Avery, Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1985-08-12
Citations: 767 F.2d 1494
Docket Number: No. 84-3084
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arthur B. AVERY, Sr., and Alisa D. Avery, Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 767
Pages: 1494–1495

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arthur B. AVERY, Sr., and Alisa D. Avery, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 84-3084.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Aug. 12, 1985.
Stuart C. Markman, Tampa, Fla., for A.B. Avery.
Claude H. Tison, Jr., Tampa, Fla., for A.D. Avery.
Robert T. Kennedy, Asst. U.S. Atty., Tampa, Fla., Janis Kockritz, U.S. Dept, of Justice, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellee.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
Before RONEY and CLARK, Circuit Judges, and SIMPSON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
On petition for panel rehearing, appellant Arthur Avery urges that we failed to analyze the prosecutor's alleged improper vouching remarks in the context of the entire trial as required by United States v. Young, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 1038, 84 L.Ed.2d 1 (1985). Even assuming the prosecutor's remarks exceeded permissible bounds, we would still conclude that any error was harmless. United States v. Hasting, 461 U.S. 499, 103 S.Ct. 1974, 76 L.Ed.2d 96 (1983); United States v. Young, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 1038, 1045 n. 10, 84 L.Ed.2d 1 (1985).
IT IS ORDERED that the petition for rehearing by appellant Arthur B. Avery, Sr., filed in the above entitled and numbered cause be and the same is hereby DENIED.