Case Name: ELIJAH ANDERSON, APPELLANT, v. CLYDE E. FREEHAFER AND JOHN HENDLER, TRADING AS FREEHAFER-HENDLER CHEVROLET COMPANY, RESPONDENTS
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1927-10-17
Citations: 104 N.J.L. 162
Docket Number: 
Parties: ELIJAH ANDERSON, APPELLANT, v. CLYDE E. FREEHAFER AND JOHN HENDLER, TRADING AS FREEHAFER-HENDLER CHEVROLET COMPANY, RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 104
Pages: 162–162

Head Matter:
ELIJAH ANDERSON, APPELLANT, v. CLYDE E. FREEHAFER AND JOHN HENDLER, TRADING AS FREEHAFER-HENDLER CHEVROLET COMPANY, RESPONDENTS.
Submitted May 27, 1927
Decided October 17, 1927.
For the appellant, Robert Peacock.
For the respondents, Wells & Tomlinson.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The printed ease presented by appellant on this appeal is radically defective. It contains no record of any judgment. It presents seven reasons, couched in general terms, in the form of a pleading, pertinent to a rule to show cause in a court of first instance why a verdict should not be set aside, but wholly irregular and improper in a case on appeal, which requires grounds for reversal to be explicitly stated.
Disregarding the form of pleading, we find, however, that none of the reasons presented sets out with sufficient distinctness in what particular respect the trial judge erred in any of his rulings, and, hence, will not be considered.
The appeal is dismissed and judgment affirmed, with costs.