Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Arthur HOWELL, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1992-08-04
Citations: 833 S.W.2d 49
Docket Number: No. 60655
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Arthur HOWELL, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 833
Pages: 49–49

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Arthur HOWELL, Defendant/Appellant.
No. 60655.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Aug. 4, 1992.
John Klosterman, St. Louis, for defendant, appellant.
William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Robert Alan Kelly, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff, respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of possession of a controlled substance. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order pursuant to Rules 30.25(b).