Case Name: In the Matter of Joseph A. Palma, Appellant and Respondent, against S. Howard Cohen et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondent. Bertram G. Eadie, Respondent and Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1941-10-24
Citations: 286 N.Y. 724
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Joseph A. Palma, Appellant and Respondent, against S. Howard Cohen et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondent. Bertram G. Eadie, Respondent and Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 286
Pages: 724–725

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Joseph A. Palma, Appellant and Respondent, against S. Howard Cohen et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondent. Bertram G. Eadie, Respondent and Appellant.
Argued October 23, 1941;
decided October 24, 1941.
Herman Methfessel for Joseph A. Palma, appellant and respondent'.
W. A. Smith for Bertram G. Eadie, respondent and appellant.
William C. Chanler, Corporation Counsel, for Board of Elections of City of New York, respondent.

Opinion:
Order affirmed, without costs. While we differ from the Appellate Division in respect of its rulings upon some ballots, none the less we find 9,736 valid votes for Eadie and 9,722 valid votes for Palma. No opinion.
Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Finch, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ.