Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. IVY FRANCINE CONGER, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1994-11-02
Citations: 131 Or. App. 263
Docket Number: 90-01-1676-C; CA A72340
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. IVY FRANCINE CONGER, Appellant.
Judges: Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Haselton, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 131
Pages: 263–264

Head Matter:
Submitted on remand September 27,
affirmed November 2, 1994
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. IVY FRANCINE CONGER, Appellant.
(90-01-1676-C; CA A72340)
883 P2d 1338
David E. Groom, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender.
Robert B. Rocklin, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Charles S. Crook-ham, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Mary H. Williams, Assistant Attorney General.
Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Haselton, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
This case was remanded to us to consider defendant's remaining two assignments of error, following the Supreme Court's reversal of our disposition of defendant's first assignment of error. State v. Conger, 319 Or 484, 878 P2d 1089 (1994). We have considered those assignments and find them to be without merit.
Affirmed.