Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Guillermo ATONDO-CASTANEDA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-10-27
Citations: 585 F. App'x 589
Docket Number: No. 13-10151
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Guillermo ATONDO-CASTANEDA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 585
Pages: 589–590

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Guillermo ATONDO-CASTANEDA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-10151.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 18, 2014.
Filed Oct. 27, 2014.
Mark S. Kokanovich, USPX-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
David Eisenberg, I, Esquire, David Ei-senberg, PLC, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Guillermo Atondo-Castaneda, Big Spring, TX, pro se.
Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Guillermo Atondo-Castaneda appeals from the district court's judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 87-month sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of actual methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 and 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(l)(A)(viii). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 886 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Atondo-Castaneda's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Atondo-Cas-taneda the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Atondo-Castaneda has waived his right to appeal his conviction and 87-month sentence. Because thé record discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the appeal waiver, we dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir.2009).
Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.