Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose MARCIANO-VILATORO, aka Jose Marciano Villatoro; aka Jose Marciano Vilatoro, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-06-18
Citations: 67 F. App'x 481
Docket Number: No. 02-50222
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jose MARCIANO-VILATORO, aka Jose Marciano Villatoro; aka Jose Marciano Vilatoro, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: RYMER, THOMAS and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 67
Pages: 481–481

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jose MARCIANO-VILATORO, aka Jose Marciano Villatoro; aka Jose Marciano Vilatoro, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 02-50222.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 9, 2003.
Decided June 18, 2003.
Before: RYMER, THOMAS and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Jose Mareiano-Vilatoro appeals his conviction by guilty plea and 57-month sentence for being found in the United States after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Marciano-Vilatoro's counsel has submitted a brief stating that she has found no meritorious issues for review. Appellant has not filed a supplemental pro se brief.
Our consideration of counsel's brief and our independent review of the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no issues requiring further review. Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.