Case Name: In re DEEPWATER HORIZON-APPEALS OF the ECONOMIC AND PROPERTY DAMAGE CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-05-19
Citations: 756 F.3d 320
Docket Number: No. 13-30095
Parties: In re DEEPWATER HORIZON-APPEALS OF the ECONOMIC AND PROPERTY DAMAGE CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT.
Judges: Before DAVIS, GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 756
Pages: 320–325

Head Matter:
In re DEEPWATER HORIZON-APPEALS OF the ECONOMIC AND PROPERTY DAMAGE CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT.
No. 13-30095.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
May 19, 2014.
Stephen Jay Herman, Esq., Soren E. Gisleson, Esq., Herman Herman & Katz, L.L.C., New Orleans, LA, Elizabeth Joan Cabraser, Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, L.L.P., San Francisco, CA, Samuel Issacharoff, New York University School of Law, New York, NY, James Parkerson Roy, Domengeaux, Wright, Roy & Edwards, Lafayette, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
John Jacob Pentz, III, Law Offices of John J. Pentz, Sudbury, MA, Stuart Cooper Yoes, Yoes Law Firm, L.L.P., Brent Wayne Coon, Esq., Attorney, Brent Coon & Associates, Beaumont, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
N. Albert Bacharach, Jr., N. Albert Ba-charach, Jr. P.A., Gainesville, FL, Kevin Walter Grillo, Pena & Grillo, P.L.L.C., Corpus Christi, TX, for Claimant-Appellant.
Richard Cartier Godfrey, Esq., Timothy A. Duffy, James Andrew Langan, Esq., Kirkland & Ellis, L.L.P., Chicago, IL, Theodore B. Olson, Miguel Angel Estrada, Thomas George Hungar, Scott Payne Martin, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, L.L.P., Robert C. Mike Brock, Covington & Bur-ling, L.L.P., Jeffrey Bossert Clark, Sr., Esq., Kirkland & Ellis, L.L.P., Washington, DC, George Howard Brown, Esq., Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, L.L.P., Palo Alto, CA, Don Keller Haycraft, Liskow & Lewis, P.L.C., New Orleans, LA, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before DAVIS, GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge.
ORDER:
The court having been polled at the request of one of its members, and a majority of the judges who are in regular active service and not disqualified not having voted in favor (Fed. R.App. P. 35 and 5th Cir.- R. 35), the petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.
In the en banc poll, five judges voted in favor of rehearing (Judges Jolly, Jones, Clement, Owen and Elrod) and eight judges voted against rehearing (Chief Judge Stewart and Judges Davis, Dennis, Prado, Southwick, Haynes, Graves and Higginson).
Judge Smith is recused and did not participate in the consideration of the petition for rehearing en banc.