Case Name: Don JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Arizona ex rel. Frank A. EYMAN, Warden, Arizona State Prison, Appellee
Court: Arizona Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Arizona
Decision Date: 1973-01-30
Citations: 19 Ariz. App. 153
Docket Number: No. 2 CA-CIV 1294
Parties: Don JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Arizona ex rel. Frank A. EYMAN, Warden, Arizona State Prison, Appellee.
Judges: HATHAWAY, C. J., and KRUCKER, J., concur.
Reporter: Arizona Appeals Reports
Volume: 19
Pages: 153–153

Head Matter:
505 P.2d 1044
Don JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Arizona ex rel. Frank A. EYMAN, Warden, Arizona State Prison, Appellee.
No. 2 CA-CIV 1294.
Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.
Jan. 30, 1973.
Don Jones, in pro. per.
Gary K. Nelson, Atty. Gen. by Howard D. Fell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tucson, and C. Burton Cosgrove, III, Third Year Law Student Certified, Under Rule 28(e), for appellee.

Opinion:
OPINION ON REHEARING
HOWARD, Judge.
On December 27, 1972, 19 Ariz.App. 26, 504 P.2d 949, this court rendered its opinion in the above entitled case. A timely motion for rehearing was made by the appellant. We did not discuss in our opinion appellant's claim that the authorities, in compiling his release date, failed to consider all of the "good time" which he has accrued. In other words, he contends he has served three years and five months as of October 16, 1972, and the prison has failed to give him credit for the five-month period.
This contention is without merit. Good conduct time under A.R.S. § 31-251 is to be credited to a prisoner only upon completion of each full year served. Fragosa v. Eyman, 3 Ariz.App. 308, 414 P.2d 157 (1966). Consequently, the period of five months cannot be considered for credit purposes.
Upon the filing of this supplemental opinion, appellant's motion for rehearing is denied.
HATHAWAY, C. J., and KRUCKER, J., concur.