Case Name: Joseph Charles CRAFT, et al., Petitioners, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1988-01-07
Citations: 517 So. 2d 691
Docket Number: No. 68421
Parties: Joseph Charles CRAFT, et al., Petitioners, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: MCDONALD, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 517
Pages: 691–692

Head Matter:
Joseph Charles CRAFT, et al., Petitioners, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 68421.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Jan. 7, 1988.
Eric A. Latinsky, Daytona Beach, for Craft and Parnell.
Michael H. Lambert, P.A., Daytona Beach, for Young, Taylor, Burton and Franchini.
Stephen L. Boyles, State Atty. and John V. Doyle, Asst. State Atty., Daytona Beach, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We accepted jurisdiction to review State v. Young, 483 So.2d 31 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985), because of apparent conflict with, inter alia, State v. Ducksworth, 408 So.2d 589 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). However, upon closer examination we do not find the express and direct conflict of decisions required by article V, section 3(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution. Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for review as improvidently granted.
It is so ordered.
MCDONALD, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.