Case Name: Sadie SOLOMON, Appellant, v. David MERMELSTEIN and Aaron Herskowitz, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-05-17
Citations: 542 So. 2d 1070
Docket Number: No. 87-2233
Parties: Sadie SOLOMON, Appellant, v. David MERMELSTEIN and Aaron Herskowitz, Appellees.
Judges: DELL, POLEN and GARRETT, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 542
Pages: 1070–1070

Head Matter:
Sadie SOLOMON, Appellant, v. David MERMELSTEIN and Aaron Herskowitz, Appellees.
No. 87-2233.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
May 17, 1989.
Robert P. Kelly of McLaughlin & Kelly, P.A., Hallandale, for appellant.
Rosemary Wilder and Richard A. Sherman of Law Offices of Richard A. Sherman, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant's first point contests the propriety of the trial court's special jury instruction regarding the duty of a property owner to warn an invitee of the existence of a danger when the invitee's knowledge of the danger may be equal to or greater than the owner's. While the complained-of instruction appears to be erroneous, under the facts of this case we find the error to be harmless. Kolosky v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., 472 So.2d 891 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), rev. denied, 482 So.2d 350 (Fla.1986).
We find no merit in the other points raised by appellant. Therefore, the verdict and judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
DELL, POLEN and GARRETT, JJ., concur.