Case Name: David PERKINS-BEY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-08-18
Citations: 974 S.W.2d 654
Docket Number: No. 73470
Parties: David PERKINS-BEY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before JAMES R. DOWD, P.J., and CRAHAN and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 974
Pages: 654–654

Head Matter:
David PERKINS-BEY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. 73470.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Aug. 18, 1998.
Mark A. Grothoff, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Karen L. Kramer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before JAMES R. DOWD, P.J., and CRAHAN and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
David Perkins-Bey (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without a hearing. Movant's convictions for first degree robbery, section 569.020, RSMo 1994, and armed criminal action, section 571.015, RSMo 1994, were affirmed on appeal in State v. Perkins, 945 S.W.2d 43 (Mo.App. E.D.1997).
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's decision is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).