Case Name: Minnie O'Rourke, Respondent, v. Simon Feist, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1898-10
Citations: 24 Misc. 762
Docket Number: 
Parties: Minnie O’Rourke, Respondent, v. Simon Feist, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 24
Pages: 762–762

Head Matter:
Minnie O’Rourke, Respondent, v. Simon Feist, Appellant.
Appeal from judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan, tenth district.
Benjamin Steinhardt, for appellant.
John M. Lathrop, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The case of Berg v. Parsons, 156 N. Y. 109, is not an authority adverse to the conclusions arrived at in the case of Randolph v. Feist, 23 Misc. Rep. 650, which we consider controls the disposition of the case at bar.
The facts on which the former case rests are quite different from those in Randolph v. Feist and in the present case, and the remarks of the judge, giving the opinion of the majority of the Court of Appeals, on which counsel for the appellant lays stress, are mere dicta unnecessary.to the decision of the case.
The judgment must be affirmed, with costs.
Present: Beekman, P. J., Gildersleeve and Giegerich, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.