Case Name: BILLY MILES v. STATE
Court: Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1917-10-03
Citations: 14 Okla. Crim. 97
Docket Number: No. A-2774
Parties: BILLY MILES v. STATE.
Judges: ARMSTRONG and MATSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Oklahoma Criminal Reports
Volume: 14
Pages: 97–98

Head Matter:
BILLY MILES v. STATE.
No. A-2774.
Opinion Filed October 3, 1917.
(167 Pac. 636.)
INTOXICATING LIQUORS — Possession with Intent to Sell — Sufficiency of Evidence. In a prosecution for the possession of intoxicating liquors with intent to sell the same, the evidence examined, and held sufficient to sustain the verdict and judgment.
Appeal from County Court, Tulsa County; John R. Ramsey, Judge.
Billy Miles was convicted of possessing intoxicating liquors with intent to sell them, in violation of the prohibitory law, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
Earl Sneed, for plaintiff in error.
R. McMillan, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Opinion:
DOYLE, P. J.
Plaintiff in error, Billy Miles, was tried and convicted in the county court of Tulsa county on an information charging that he did have possession of intoxicating liquors with the unlawful intent to sell the same, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $100 and imprisonment in the county jail for 30 days. From the judgment rendered in pursuance of the verdict, he appeals.
An examination of the record discloses that the information is sufficient. The evidence shows that in the execution of a search warrant against the Diamond Drug Store, in the city of Tulsa, the officers found a sack containing about 40 bottles of beer behind the prescription case. There was evidence tending to show that' Billy Miles was the owner and proprietor of said drug store. There was no evidence offered on the part of the defense.
Upon a careful examination of the record we find the charge of the court fairly presents the law of the case; that the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict and judgment.
No error being apparent, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
ARMSTRONG and MATSON, JJ., concur.