Case Name: Sarah Hoey, Respondent, v. Frederick E. Cloud, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1900-12
Citations: 33 Misc. 764
Docket Number: 
Parties: Sarah Hoey, Respondent, v. Frederick E. Cloud, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 33
Pages: 764–764

Head Matter:
Sarah Hoey, Respondent, v. Frederick E. Cloud, Appellant.
Appeal from a final order in summary proceedings of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, sixth district, borough of Manhattan.
Guggenheimer, Untermyer & Marshall (Moses Weinman, of counsel), for appellant.
Albert I. Sire, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
There is not sufficient evidence in this ease to support a finding either that the petitioner had obtained a renewal of the lease of the' premises in question from her lessor or that a renewal agreement was executed between the petitioner and her sub-tenant. While there is slight evidence relating to negotiations between the petitioner and a representative of her lessor, yet it does not appear that the agreement was consummated, and the verdict of the jury is without evidence to support it. .
Final order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.
Present: Beekmak, P. J., Giegebich and O'Gobmah, JJ.
Final order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.