Case Name: Michael TUPICA and Nina Uglinica, Appellants, v. John MACINA, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1984-08-01
Citations: 454 So. 2d 682
Docket Number: No. 83-2622
Parties: Michael TUPICA and Nina Uglinica, Appellants, v. John MACINA, Appellee.
Judges: ANSTEAD, C.J., HURLEY, J., and GREEN, OLIVER L., Jr., Associate Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 454
Pages: 682–683

Head Matter:
Michael TUPICA and Nina Uglinica, Appellants, v. John MACINA, Appellee.
No. 83-2622.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Aug. 1, 1984.
Rehearing Denied Sept. 18, 1984.
Philip J. Padovano, Tallahassee, and Richard B. Mateer of Richard B. Mateer, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellants.
Gary R. Gromet, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Upon review of the record we believe that there is an adequate evidentiary basis to support the trial court's judgment can-celling a warranty deed executed by the appellee in favor of the appellants. We also reject appellants' claim that the trial court erred in failing to reform the terms of the deed, there having been no claim for reformation made by any of the parties in the trial court.
ANSTEAD, C.J., HURLEY, J., and GREEN, OLIVER L., Jr., Associate Judge, concur.