Case Name: The State of Washington, on the Relation of Robert P. Donnelly et al., Plaintiffs, v. Ralph C. Bell, Respondent
Court: Washington Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Washington
Decision Date: 1930-06-04
Citations: 157 Wash. 696
Docket Number: No. 22567
Parties: The State of Washington, on the Relation of Robert P. Donnelly et al., Plaintiffs, v. Ralph C. Bell, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Washington Reports
Volume: 157
Pages: 696–696

Head Matter:
[No. 22567.
Department Two.
June 4, 1930.]
The State of Washington, on the Relation of Robert P. Donnelly et al., Plaintiffs, v. Ralph C. Bell, Respondent.
Anderson & Richards and Earl W. Husted, for relators;
Charles R. Denney, for respondent.
Reported in 289 Pac. 27.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This is a similar case to that of State ex rel. Miller v. Bell, ante p. 279, 289 Pac. 25.
In this case there are three counts in the information, alleging different dates and different quantities of intoxicating liquor, other than alcohol, being carried about by relators, for unlawful sale or disposition in Snohomish county, Washington.
For the reasons stated in the Miller case, supra, the alternative writ is quashed and the peremptory writ denied.