Case Name: Leya REKHTER, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CENTRAL PARK EAST LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Washington Partnership, dba/Central Park East Apartments; Kauri Investments Limited, a Washington corporation; Central Park East Apartments, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-03-13
Citations: 31 F. App'x 506
Docket Number: No. 00-35741; D.C. No. CV-99-00461-BJR
Parties: Leya REKHTER, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. CENTRAL PARK EAST LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Washington Partnership, dba/Central Park East Apartments; Kauri Investments Limited, a Washington corporation; Central Park East Apartments, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 31
Pages: 506–507

Head Matter:
Leya REKHTER, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. CENTRAL PARK EAST LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Washington Partnership, dba/Central Park East Apartments; Kauri Investments Limited, a Washington corporation; Central Park East Apartments, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 00-35741. D.C. No. CV-99-00461-BJR.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 8, 2002 .
Decided March 13, 2002.
Before POLITZ, CANBY, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
The Honorable Henry A. Politz, Senior United States Court of Appeals Judge for the Fifth Circuit, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Ms. Rekhter, pro se, appeals from a summary judgment dismissing her claims under 42 U.S.C. § 3604 (2000). Ms. Rekhter has not raised a genuine issue of fact whether the defendants discriminated against her on the basis of any protected status, nor has she raised a genuine issue whether the defendants' policy had a significantly adverse or disproportionate impact on persons of a particular group. Summary judgment was proper.
AFFIRMED.
jjjjg disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
. See Harris v. Itzhaki, 183 F.3d 1043, 1051 (9th Cir. 1999).
. See Pfaff v. United States Department of Housing, 88 F.3d 739, 745 (9th Cir. 1996).
. See Harris, 183 F.3d at 1051.