Case Name: Leon Enzler, Respondent, v. Charles A. Saretsky et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1956-02-14
Citations: 1 A.D.2d 803
Docket Number: 
Parties: Leon Enzler, Respondent, v. Charles A. Saretsky et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 1
Pages: 803–803

Head Matter:
Leon Enzler, Respondent, v. Charles A. Saretsky et al., Appellants.

Opinion:
Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. The suggested ambiguity requiring interpretation and application of the order may appropriately be made the subject of a ruling at Special Term, Part II. The date for the examination to proceed shall be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Concur — Peck, P. J., Breitel, Bastow, Botein and Rabin, JJ.