Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Franklyn Soleyn, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2012-06-06
Citations: 96 A.D.3d 787
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Franklyn Soleyn, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 96
Pages: 787–787

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Franklyn Soleyn, Appellant.
[945 NYS2d 574]

Opinion:
— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Parker, J), rendered May 1, 2008, convicting him of murder in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his intent to kill the victim is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Hawkins, 11 NY3d 484, 492 [2008]; People v Pickens, 60 AD3d 699, 701 [2009]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish that the defendant intended to cause the victim's death (see People v Bryant, 39 AD3d 768 [2007]; People v Jones, 229 AD2d 597 [1996]; People v Hogan, 219 AD2d 672 [1995]). Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]; People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342 [2007]), we nevertheless accord great deference to the jury's opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor (see People v Mateo, 2 NY3d 383, 410 [2004], cert denied 542 US 946 [2004]; People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Dillon, J.P., Dickerson, Austin and Miller, JJ., concur.