Case Name: Linda Marie DiBIANO, Petitioner, v. HOWARD JOHNSON, INC., OF FLORIDA, and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1965-03-10
Citations: 172 So. 2d 580
Docket Number: No. 34022
Parties: Linda Marie DiBIANO, Petitioner, v. HOWARD JOHNSON, INC., OF FLORIDA, and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
Judges: DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, O’CON-NELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 172
Pages: 580–581

Head Matter:
Linda Marie DiBIANO, Petitioner, v. HOWARD JOHNSON, INC., OF FLORIDA, and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
No. 34022.
Supreme Court of Florida.
March 10, 1965.
L. Barry Keyfetz and Kaplan, Ser, Abrams & O’Malley, Miami, for petitioner.
Summers Warden, Miami, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date January 4, 1965.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dis pensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.
DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, O'CON-NELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.