Case Name: Tracy Posner WARD, Kelly Posner-Gerstenhaber, Jarrett Posner, and Sean Posner, Appellants v. Brenda NESTOR, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Victor Posner, and Troy Posner, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2004-10-13
Citations: 884 So. 2d 522
Docket Number: No. 3D03-2989
Parties: Tracy Posner WARD, Kelly Posner-Gerstenhaber, Jarrett Posner, and Sean Posner, Appellants v. Brenda NESTOR, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Victor Posner, and Troy Posner, Appellees.
Judges: Before SHEVIN, WELLS and SHEPHERD, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 884
Pages: 522–523

Head Matter:
Tracy Posner WARD, Kelly Posner-Gerstenhaber, Jarrett Posner, and Sean Posner, Appellants v. Brenda NESTOR, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Victor Posner, and Troy Posner, Appellees.
No. 3D03-2989.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 13, 2004.
Hunton & Williams and Marty Stein-berg and Thomas R. Julin and Eduardo Gonzalez and Daniel Fridman, Miami, for appellants Kelly Posner-Gerstenhaber, Jarrett Posner and Sean Posner; Alschu-ler Grossman Stein & Kahan and Stanton L. Stein and Mark A. Neubauer and Michael A. Sherman and Rebecca Edelson; Golden & Cowan and Edward I. Golden and Steven M. Toister, for appellant Tracy Posner Ward.
Ferrell, Schultz, Carter & Fertel and Joseph Beeler, Miami; Tescher, Gutter, Chaves, Josepher, Rubin, Ruffin & For-man and Norman A. Fleisher; Kirkland & Ellis and Andrew B. Clubok and Richard A. Cordray and John P. Consoulin, for appellees.
Before SHEVIN, WELLS and SHEPHERD, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Tracy Posner Ward, Kelly Posner-Ger-stenhaber, Jarret Posner, and Sean Pos- ner, petitioners seeking partial or total revocation of Victor Posner's June 28, 2001 will, appeal from two probate court orders, one approving a settlement agreement between co-petitioner Troy Posner, Victor Posner's estate and the personal representative individually, the other denying their joint motion for appointment of an administrator ad litem.
Upon consideration of the arguments made in the parties' briefs and at oral argument, we dismiss both appeals as premature without prejudice to re-raising both issues following final disposition of the revocation proceedings.