Case Name: Malcolm WINFIELD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1984-11-06
Citations: 458 So. 2d 1171
Docket Number: No. 83-2521
Parties: Malcolm WINFIELD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING, Appellee.
Judges: Before NESBITT, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 458
Pages: 1171–1171

Head Matter:
Malcolm WINFIELD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING, Appellee.
No. 83-2521.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 6, 1984.
Rehearing Denied Dec. 17, 1984.
Milton E. Grusmark, Miami, Sheryl Low-enthal, Coral Gables, for appellant.
Elliot Henslovitz, Staff Atty., Miami, for appellee.
Before NESBITT, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The final order of the Division of PariMutuel Wagering is affirmed upon a holding that there is substantial competent evidence in the record to support the hearing officer's determinations, which were adopted by the Division, that Winfield violated three rules of the Florida Administrative Code.
Affirmed.