Case Name: Edward CRUMER, Claimant/Respondent, v. ST. LOUIS COUNTY, Employer, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri, as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Additional Party/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-09-21
Citations: 144 S.W.3d 323
Docket Number: No. ED 84238
Parties: Edward CRUMER, Claimant/Respondent, v. ST. LOUIS COUNTY, Employer, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri, as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Additional Party/Appellant.
Judges: Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 144
Pages: 323–324

Head Matter:
Edward CRUMER, Claimant/Respondent, v. ST. LOUIS COUNTY, Employer, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri, as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Additional Party/Appellant.
No. ED 84238.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Sept. 21, 2004.
James J. Sievers, Jr., Sievers & Associates, Clayton, MO, for respondent.
Kevin A. Nelson, Assistant Attorney General, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
In this worker's compensation case, the Second Injury Fund appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission finding Second Injury Fund Liability.
The order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm the award pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
The motion requesting sanctions for frivolous appeal is denied.