Case Name: Hugh WEST, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-10-14
Citations: 119 S.W.3d 180
Docket Number: No. ED 82071
Parties: Hugh WEST, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 119
Pages: 180–180

Head Matter:
Hugh WEST, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 82071.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Oct. 14, 2003.
Scott Thompson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
John Munson Morris, III, Assistant Attorney General, Charnette D. Douglass, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Hugh West, appeals from the judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court's judgment is based on findings of facts and conclusions of law that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only, which sets forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).