Case Name: In the Matter of New York Public Interest Research Group et al., Respondents, v. Rudolf Giuliani, as Mayor of the City of New York, et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1996-06-13
Citations: 228 A.D.2d 276
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of New York Public Interest Research Group et al., Respondents, v Rudolf Giuliani, as Mayor of the City of New York, et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 228
Pages: 276–277

Head Matter:
In the Matter of New York Public Interest Research Group et al., Respondents, v Rudolf Giuliani, as Mayor of the City of New York, et al., Appellants.
[644 NYS2d 38]

Opinion:
The authority of elected officials to appoint is a "power" within the meaning of Municipal Home Rule Law § 23 (2) (f) and New York City Charter § 38 (5), and therefore any law that would abolish, transfer or curtail such must be approved by referendum (see, Morin v Foster, 45 NY2d 287, 295; Ferraro v Rettaliata, 165 AD2d 860, 861-862, lv denied 76 NY2d 713). The New York City Charter, adopted in 1989 by a referendum, mandates in sections 259 and 1152 that certain elected officials appoint a director of an Independent Budget Office by August I, 1990 and that the IBO be funded in a mandatory minimum amount. Local Laws, 1994, No. 30 of the City of New York delays the appointment and funding of the IBO. We agree with petitioner's argument that the power to delay (without limit) is the power to destroy. In any event, since that postponement would curtail a power of elected officials, it is invalid in the absence of an approving referendum. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Wallach, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.