Case Name: Michael Daniel HERRINGTON v. STATE of Arkansas
Court: Arkansas Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Arkansas
Decision Date: 1984-09-10
Citations: 283 Ark. 231
Docket Number: 
Parties: Michael Daniel HERRINGTON v. STATE of Arkansas
Judges: 
Reporter: Arkansas Reports
Volume: 283
Pages: 231–231

Head Matter:
Michael Daniel HERRINGTON v. STATE of Arkansas
674 S.W.2d 505
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Opinion delivered September 10, 1984
Bruce D. Switzer, for appellant.
Steve Clark, Att’y Gen., by: Theodore G. Holder, Asst. Att’y Gen., for appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Appellant, Michael Daniel Herrington, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk. His attorney, Bruce D. Switzer, admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.
We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5,1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases.
A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.