Case Name: William H. GRAVITT, III, and Javco International Corporation, Appellants, v. ANOVA FOOD BV, a foreign corporation and Constant Mulder, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2004-10-13
Citations: 884 So. 2d 1033
Docket Number: Nos. 3D04-353, 3D04-1251
Parties: William H. GRAVITT, III, and Javco International Corporation, Appellants, v. ANOVA FOOD BV, a foreign corporation and Constant Mulder, Appellee.
Judges: Before COPE, GERSTEN, and GREEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 884
Pages: 1033–1033

Head Matter:
William H. GRAVITT, III, and Javco International Corporation, Appellants, v. ANOVA FOOD BV, a foreign corporation and Constant Mulder, Appellee.
Nos. 3D04-353, 3D04-1251.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 13, 2004.
Jack P. Attias, North Miami, for appellant.
David L. Rich, P.A. and Adam E. Miller (Margate); McManus Smith, LLP, and Ray S. Smith, III (Georgia), for appellee.
Before COPE, GERSTEN, and GREEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this consolidated appeal, Javco International Corporation and William H. Gravitt, III appeal from final summary judgments entered in favor of the defendants, Anova Food BV. and Constant Mulder, in these malicious prosecution cases. Because we find that there are genuine issues of material fact as to whether there were bona fide terminations on the merits, we reverse. See Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Mancusi 632 So.2d 1352 (Fla.1994) (whether bargained for agreement constitutes bona fide termination is question of fact for jury).
GERSTEN and GREEN, JJ., concur.