Case Name: Bridgemarket Associates, Respondent, v. City of New York et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1993-02-09
Citations: 190 A.D.2d 561
Docket Number: 
Parties: Bridgemarket Associates, Respondent, v City of New York et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 190
Pages: 561–562

Head Matter:
Bridgemarket Associates, Respondent, v City of New York et al., Appellants.

Opinion:
— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eugene L. Nardelli, J.), entered October 9, 1991, which denied defendants' motion for a stay of this action pending exhaustion of appellate remedies in Sutton Area Community v City of New York (190 AD2d 562 [decided herewith]), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
These two actions, while arising from the same set of transactions, do not have complete identity of parties and causes of action, and thus a stay under CPLR 2201 is not warranted (Hope's Windows v Albro Metal Prods. Corp., 93 AD2d 711, 712, appeal dismissed 59 NY2d 968). Concur— Carro, J. P., Milonas, Ellerin and Asch, JJ.