Case Name: Laura C. KOSCKI, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS CORPORATION OF DELAWARE, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-02-27
Citations: 223 F. App'x 565
Docket Number: No. 05-56950
Parties: Laura C. KOSCKI, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS CORPORATION OF DELAWARE, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 223
Pages: 565–566

Head Matter:
Laura C. KOSCKI, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS CORPORATION OF DELAWARE, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 05-56950.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 20, 2007.
Filed Feb. 27, 2007.
Laura C. Koscki, Seal Beach, CA, pro se.
Alexandra A. Roje, Esq., Latham & Watkins, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before: BEEZER, FERNANDEZ, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Laura Koscki appeals pro se from the district court's order rejecting her motion to reconsider its order dismissing her action against her former employer, Consolidated Freightways Corporation of Delaware. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion, Casey v. Albertson's Inc., 362 F.3d 1254, 1257 (9th Cir.2004), and we affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to reconsider its judgment dismissing Koscki's action with prejudice, where Koscki's counsel requested dismissal with prejudice and Koscki filed her motion to reconsider 9 months after judgment was entered. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) ("Any motion to alter or amend a judgment shall be filed no later than 10 days after entry of the judgment."); Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) (motion for relief from judgment must demonstrate, inter aha, mis take, newly discovered evidence, fraud of an adverse party, or another reason justifying relief).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.