Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. David VASQUEZ, also known as David Vasquez, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-06-17
Citations: 754 F.3d 1070
Docket Number: No. 13-50776
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. David VASQUEZ, also known as David Vasquez, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING, HAYNES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 754
Pages: 1070–1070

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. David VASQUEZ, also known as David Vasquez, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-50776
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
June 17, 2014.
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Shane John Stolarczyk, Esq., Keller Sto-larczyk P.L.L.C., Boerne, TX, for Defen-danh-Appellant.
Before KING, HAYNES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent David Vasquez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Vasquez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.