Case Name: Lycurtis S. SNEED, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-07-03
Citations: 675 So. 2d 1042
Docket Number: Nos. 95-0217, 95-0284
Parties: Lycurtis S. SNEED, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: GLICKSTEIN, STEVENSON and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 675
Pages: 1042–1043

Head Matter:
Lycurtis S. SNEED, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Nos. 95-0217, 95-0284.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
July 3, 1996.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Marcy K. Allen, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee; and Michelle A. Konig, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the convictions and sentences in these consolidated appeals except for two technical corrections in appellant's probation order. The state concedes that the written order of probation does not reflect that the court orally declared appellant indigent for purposes of counseling, and that the written order requires payment of the cost of supervision, while the oral order waived the requirement that appellant pay the cost of his supervision. We remand for these corree-tjons
GLICKSTEIN, STEVENSON and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.