Case Name: Betty L. SHIFLETT and Curtis Shiflett, Husband and Wife, Petitioners v. LEHIGH VALLEY HEALTH NETWORK, INC. ; and Lehigh Valley Hospital, Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2018-08-15
Citations: 191 A.3d 745
Docket Number: No. 89 MAL 2018
Parties: Betty L. SHIFLETT and Curtis Shiflett, Husband and Wife, Petitioners
v.
LEHIGH VALLEY HEALTH NETWORK, INC. ; and Lehigh Valley Hospital, Respondents
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 191
Pages: 745–745

Head Matter:
Betty L. SHIFLETT and Curtis Shiflett, Husband and Wife, Petitioners
v.
LEHIGH VALLEY HEALTH NETWORK, INC. ; and Lehigh Valley Hospital, Respondents
No. 89 MAL 2018
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
August 15, 2018
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 15th day of August, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
Did the Superior Court panel overlook or misapprehend this Court's precedent that if a party does not request a special interrogatory on the verdict sheet allocating damages between causes, it has waived any objection to a general damage verdict?