Case Name: Sixto OLIVA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-08-30
Citations: 766 So. 2d 439
Docket Number: No. 1D00-2185
Parties: Sixto OLIVA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, et al., Appellees.
Judges: WOLF, DAVIS, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 766
Pages: 439–439

Head Matter:
Sixto OLIVA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, et al., Appellees.
No. 1D00-2185.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Aug. 30, 2000.
D. Michael Campbell of Campbell & Associates, Miami, Elizabeth Russo, of Russo Appellate Firm, Miami, and Murray M. Wadsworth of Wadsworth & Davis, Tallahassee, for the Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Louis F. Hubener, Assistant Attorney General, and James, A. Peters, Special Counsel, Tallahassee, for the Appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
An order merely granting a motion to dismiss is not an appealable, non-final order or a final order. See Benton v. Moore, 655 So.2d 1272 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). As such, this appeal is dismissed without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction.
WOLF, DAVIS, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.