Case Name: Robert G. RICHARDSON, Individually, etc. v. Bernard TATE et al.; Charles A. OSTARLY, Ind., etc. v. Bernard TATE et al.; George W. SCHAYER, Ind., etc. v. Bernard TATE et al.; Robert G. RICHARDSON, Sr. etc. v. Bernard TATE et al.
Court: Louisiana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1973-01-15
Citations: 271 So. 2d 260
Docket Number: No. 53087
Parties: Robert G. RICHARDSON, Individually, etc. v. Bernard TATE et al. Charles A. OSTARLY, Ind., etc. v. Bernard TATE et al. George W. SCHAYER, Ind., etc. v. Bernard TATE et al. Robert G. RICHARDSON, Sr. etc. v. Bernard TATE et al.
Judges: BARHAM, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, Moore, the employer of plaintiffs, was an independent contractor and the plaintiffs were not borrowed servants of this defendant.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 271
Pages: 260–260

Head Matter:
Robert G. RICHARDSON, Individually, etc. v. Bernard TATE et al. Charles A. OSTARLY, Ind., etc. v. Bernard TATE et al. George W. SCHAYER, Ind., etc. v. Bernard TATE et al. Robert G. RICHARDSON, Sr. etc. v. Bernard TATE et al.
No. 53087.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Jan. 15, 1973.

Opinion:
In re: T. L. James & Company and National Surety Corporation applying for Cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 269 So.2d 278.
Writ denied. Under the facts found, we find no error of law.
BARHAM, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, Moore, the employer of plaintiffs, was an independent contractor and the plaintiffs were not borrowed servants of this defendant.