Case Name: Lizzie Mae MIXON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2005-04-20
Citations: 899 So. 2d 496
Docket Number: No. 1D04-0787
Parties: Lizzie Mae MIXON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ERVIN, KAHN and BENTON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 899
Pages: 496–497

Head Matter:
Lizzie Mae MIXON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D04-0787.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
April 20, 2005.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; David P. Gauldin, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Charlie Crist, Attorney General; Bryan Jordan, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant's conviction is AFFIRMED. The error, if any, in admitting the victim's out-of-court statement to Deputy Bates, was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. A harmless error analysis applies to the recent United States Supreme Court decision of Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004). See, e.g., United States v. Rodriguez-Marrero, 390 F.3d 1, 17-18 (1st Cir.2004); United States v. Jones, 393 F.3d 107, 109 (2d Cir.2004); United States v. Robinson, 389 F.3d 582, 593 (6th Cir.2004); United States v. Gilbert, 391 F.3d 882, 884 (7th Cir.2004); Williams v. United States, 858 A.2d 978, 981 (D.C.2004); Porter v. State, 278 Ga. 694, 606 S.E.2d 240, 243 (2004); Vigil v. State, 98 P.3d 172, 179 (Wyo.2004); Somervell v. State, 883 So.2d 836, 839 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).
ERVIN, KAHN and BENTON, JJ., concur.