Case Name: BRIGGS et v. BOYLE et
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1941-11-10
Citations: 35 Ohio Law Abs. 639
Docket Number: No 18280
Parties: BRIGGS et v BOYLE et
Judges: The facts are stated fully in the dissenting opinion of MORGAN, J.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 35
Pages: 639–643

Head Matter:
BRIGGS et v BOYLE et
Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist., Cuyahoga Co. .
No 18280.
Decided Nov. 10, 1941.
Cary R. Alburn, Cleveland; Hauxhurst, Inglis, Sharp & Cull, Cleveland, for plaintiffs-appellees.
Frank T. Cullitan, County Prosecutor, Cleveland; Frederick W. Frey, Asst., Cleveland, for defendant-appellant.
The facts are stated fully in the dissenting opinion of MORGAN, J.

Opinion:
OPINION
It is the opinion of the majority of this court that the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas should be reversed for error of law by reason of non-compliance with §12075 GC and §12077 GC, and final judgment is entered for the defendant-appellant herein. Exceptions noted.
LIEGHLEY, PJ., SKEEL, J., concur. MORGAN, J., dissents.