Case Name: Carlos Amador RIVAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CARNIVAL CORPORATION, d.b.a. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-12-13
Citations: 448 F. App'x 981
Docket Number: No. 10-11937
Parties: Carlos Amador RIVAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CARNIVAL CORPORATION, d.b.a. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before CARNES, BARKETT and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 448
Pages: 981–982

Head Matter:
Carlos Amador RIVAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CARNIVAL CORPORATION, d.b.a. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 10-11937
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Dec. 13, 2011.
Joel S. Perwin, Joel S. Perwin, P.A., Bruce Margulies, Brett Rivkind, Rivkind, Pedraza & Margulies, P.A., Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Richard Greiffenstein, Curtis J. Mase, Mase & Lara, P.A., Scott P. Mebane, Va-lentina M. Tejera, Mase Lara Eversole, P.A., Miami, FL, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before CARNES, BARKETT and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Carlos Rivas appeals the district court's order dismissing his case and compelling arbitration. After we issued our opinions in Lindo v. NCL (Bahamas), Ltd., 652 F.3d 1257 (11th Cir.2011), and Henriquez v. NCL Bahamas (Ltd.), 440 Fed.Appx. 714, 2011 WL 3890357 (11th Cir.2011), we asked Rivas and Carnival Corporation to submit supplemental letter briefs discussing the effect of those decisions on this appeal. In his supplemental letter brief, Rivas concedes that our decision in Lindo forecloses his arguments in this appeal. We agree.
AFFIRMED.