Case Name: Joyce BATTLE, Employee/Appellant, v. BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL, Employer/Respondent, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Additional Party/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2007-05-15
Citations: 228 S.W.3d 586
Docket Number: No. ED 88583
Parties: Joyce BATTLE, Employee/Appellant, v. BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL, Employer/Respondent, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Additional Party/Respondent.
Judges: Before GEORGE W. DRAPER III, P.J. and GARY M. GAERTNER, SR. and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 228
Pages: 586–587

Head Matter:
Joyce BATTLE, Employee/Appellant, v. BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL, Employer/Respondent, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Additional Party/Respondent.
No. ED 88583.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District.
May 15, 2007.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 18, 2007.
Joyce Battle, St. Louis, MO, pro se.
Kareitha A. Osborne, Attorney General’s Office, Betsy Joy Levitt, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.
Before GEORGE W. DRAPER III, P.J. and GARY M. GAERTNER, SR. and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Joyce Battle appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying her claim for workers' compensation benefits from her employer, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, and the Second Injury Fund.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. After reviewing the whole record, we find the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's award is supported by competent and substantial evidence and is not contrary the overwhelming weight of the evidence. Hampton v. Big Boy Steel Erection, 121 S.W.3d 220, 223 (Mo. banc 2003). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b). Joyce Battle's motions taken with the case are hereby denied.