Case Name: Shaw v. The State
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1923-12-05
Citations: 31 Ga. App. 309
Docket Number: 15048
Parties: Shaw v. The State.
Judges: Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 31
Pages: 309–309

Head Matter:
15048.
Shaw v. The State.
Decided December 5, 1923.
Indictment for larceny of automobile; from Fulton superior court—Judge E. D. Thomas. September 8, 1923.
O. G. Battle, IF. Paul Carpenter, for plaintiff in error.
John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, E. A. Stephens, R. H. Pharr, contra.

Opinion:
Broyles, ó. J.
1. The exceptions pendente lite (complaining of the overruling of a demurrer to the indictment) cannot-be considered, as the main bill of exceptions contains no assignment of error upon the exceptions pendente lite or upon the judgment of the court overruling the demurrer. Nor can the overruling of a demurrer to an indictment be a ground of a motion for a new trial.
2. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and none of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial which were approved by the court (the disapproved grounds not being considered) requires a reversal of the judgment below.
Judgment affirmed.
Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.