Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Truc TRAN, a.k.a. Daniel, a.k.a. Truc Trung Tran, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-01-27
Citations: 467 F. App'x 659
Docket Number: No. 10-50339
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Truc TRAN, a.k.a. Daniel, a.k.a. Truc Trung Tran, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 467
Pages: 659–660

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Truc TRAN, a.k.a. Daniel, a.k.a. Truc Trung Tran, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 10-50339.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 17, 2012.
Filed Jan. 27, 2012.
Christopher Khoo Pelham, Michael J. Raphael, Esquire, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Lawrence Jay Litman, Litman Law, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: LEAVY, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. Appellant. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
True Tran appeals from the 46-month sentence imposed following his jury-trial conviction for conspiracy to distribute methylenedioxy-methamphetamine (MDMA), in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, 841(a)(1), and possession with intent to distribute MDMA, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Tran contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to consider whether a minor participant downward departure was warranted pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(b). This contention is without merit, as Tran failed to request a minor participant departure to the district court. See United States v. Quesada, 972 F.2d 281, 284 (9th Cir.1992).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cír. R. 36-3.