Case Name: Romanoff Caviar Company et al., complainants-appellants, v. Edward G. Hansen et al., defendants-respondents
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1939-10-16
Citations: 126 N.J. Eq. 275
Docket Number: 
Parties: Romanoff Caviar Company et al., complainants-appellants, v. Edward G. Hansen et al., defendants-respondents,
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 126
Pages: 275–275

Head Matter:
Romanoff Caviar Company et al., complainants-appellants, v. Edward G. Hansen et al., defendants-respondents,
[Argued May 24th, 1939.
Decided October 16th, 1939.]
Mr. William, Charlton, for the appellants.
Messrs. Starr, Summerill é Lloyd (Mr. Franlc T. Lloyd, of counsel), for the respondents James Mercer Davis and Edward G. Hansen, and James Mercer Davis, pro se.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
These cases present cross-appeals from a decree of chancery dated December 30th, 1938, and advised by Vice-Chancellor Sooy.
We have carefully considered the proofs, the law applicable thereto, the conclusions of the vice-chancellor, under date of October 31st, 1938 (in these conclusions the vice-chancellor briefly states the results of the issue theretofore determined in this cause, and then, pursuant to written stipulation in which counsel for the respective parties, with approval of the court, assented to jurisdiction, procedure and the specific issues to be determined, disposed of the issues so submitted), the arguments and briefs of counsel for the parties, and conclude that the learned vice-chancellor reached a right result.
Accordingly, the decree under review is affirmed in each case.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Rafeerty, Hague, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.