Case Name: In the Matter of Allstate Insurance Company, Respondent, v. Pearl Libow, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1985-06-28
Citations: 65 N.Y. 807
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Allstate Insurance Company, Respondent, v Pearl Libow, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 65
Pages: 807–809

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Allstate Insurance Company, Respondent, v Pearl Libow, Appellant.
Argued May 30, 1985;
decided June 28, 1985
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
James Cohen and Daniel Cohen for appellant.
J. Irwin Shapiro and Daniel Kolko for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by former Justice Seymour Boyers at the Appellate Division (106 AD2d 110). We note, however, that the regulations of the Superintendent of Insurance (11 NYCRR 60.1 [a]) construe Vehicle and Traffic Law § 311 (4) (a) which contains language equivalent to the former Insurance Law § 167 (2-a) (now codified at § 3420 [f] [1]) at issue here.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone and Boomer. Taking no part: Judge Meyer.
Designated pursuant to NY Constitution, article VI, § 2.