Case Name: JANSSEN, Appellant, v. TUSHA, et all Respondents, HOFER, et al Additional Defendants, and JANSSEN, Impleaded Co-Defendant; JANSSEN, Appellant, v. TUSHA, Respondent, HOFER, et al Additional Defendants, JANSSEN, Impleaded Co-Defendant
Court: South Dakota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: South Dakota
Decision Date: 1937-03-15
Citations: 65 S.D. 124
Docket Number: Files Nos. 7992 and 7993
Parties: JANSSEN, Appellant, v. TUSHA, et all Respondents, HOFER, et al Additional Defendants, and JANSSEN, Impleaded Co-Defendant. JANSSEN, Appellant, v. TUSHA, Respondent, HOFER, et al Additional Defendants, JANSSEN, Impleaded Co-Defendant.
Judges: All the Judges concur.
Reporter: South Dakota Reports
Volume: 65
Pages: 124–124

Head Matter:
JANSSEN, Appellant, v. TUSHA, et all Respondents, HOFER, et al Additional Defendants, and JANSSEN, Impleaded Co-Defendant. JANSSEN, Appellant, v. TUSHA, Respondent, HOFER, et al Additional Defendants, JANSSEN, Impleaded Co-Defendant.
(271 N. W. 823)
(Files Nos. 7992 and 7993.
Opinion filed March 15, 1937)
H. Van Ruschen and C. H. 'McKay, both of Salem, for Appellants.
Herman Bleeker, of Alexandria, and Roscoe Satterlee, of Mitchell, for Respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
John D. Janssen and Dick D. Janssen brought separate actions to quiet title to tracts of land in McCook county. The complaints are in the usual statutory form alleging that the 'defendants claim to have some right, title, or interest in and to tile property described therein adverse to the plaintiffs. The defendants interposed in each case an answer and counterclaim. Demurrers thereto' were overruled, and plaintiffs have appealed.
We have, carefully considered the grounds urged by the demurrers and are of the opinion that the learned trial court, ruled correctly and that the contentions of appellants are without merit.
The orders appealed from are affirmed.
All the Judges concur.