Case Name: Gary M. DIRK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2007-11-30
Citations: 969 So. 2d 1170
Docket Number: No. 5D06-3770
Parties: Gary M. DIRK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SAWAYA, TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 969
Pages: 1170–1171

Head Matter:
Gary M. DIRK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D06-3770.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Nov. 30, 2007.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Ailene S. Rogers, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Roark Wall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Ap-pellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This court has previously held that the United States Supreme Court decisions in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000) and Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004) do not apply retroactively in those cases in which the convictions became final prior to the Apprendi decision, even though resentencing occurred post-Apprendi See Rouse v. State, 965 So.2d 201 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007); Langford v. State, 929 So.2d 598 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). As we did in Langford, we certify conflict with Isaac v. State, 911 So.2d 813 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).
AFFIRMED; CONFLICT CERTIFIED.
SAWAYA, TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.