Case Name: Grossman, Midtown Telephone Answering Service, Inc., Appellant, v. Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, Appellee
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1966-03-02
Citations: 5 Ohio St. 2d 189
Docket Number: No. 39436
Parties: Grossman, Midtown Telephone Answering Service, Inc., Appellant, v. Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, Appellee.
Judges: Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Second Series
Volume: 5
Pages: 189–190

Head Matter:
Grossman, Midtown Telephone Answering Service, Inc., Appellant, v. Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, Appellee.
[Cite as Grossman v. Pub. Util. Comm., 5 Ohio St. 2d 189.]
(No. 39436
Decided March 2, 1966.)
Mr. William B. Webber and Messrs. Roemisch & Wright, for appellant.
Mr. William B. Saosbe, attorney general, Mr. Theodore K. High and Mr. Clark G. Redick, for appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This case presents a question of fact. The burden of proof rests upon the complainant. He has failed to produce evidence to establish his claim. The order of the Public Utilities Commission is affirmed.
Order affirmed.
Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O'Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.