Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jorge Alberto GAYTAN MARTELL, also known as Jorge, also known as Gera, also known as Gerardo Carreon, also known as Aaron Cordero, also known as Alejandro Carrillo, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-09-07
Citations: 697 F. App'x 348
Docket Number: No. 16-50449 Summary Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jorge Alberto GAYTAN MARTELL, also known as Jorge, also known as Gera, also known as Gerardo Carreon, also known as Aaron Cordero, also known as Alejandro Carrillo, Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 697
Pages: 348–349

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jorge Alberto GAYTAN MARTELL, also known as Jorge, also known as Gera, also known as Gerardo Carreon, also known as Aaron Cordero, also known as Alejandro Carrillo, Defendant-Appellant
No. 16-50449 Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed September 7, 2017
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Shannon Charles Hooks, Austin, TX, for Defendant-Appellant
Jorge Alberto Gaytan Martell, Pro Se
Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Jorge Alberto Gaytan Martell, Shannon Charles Hooks, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gaytan Martell has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Gaytan Martell's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
We have reviewed counsel's briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Gaytan Martell's response. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivo-lous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Nevertheless, we note that counsel's initial and supplemental briefs failed adequately to address the appeal waiver's scope and enforceability, offering no legal analysis and, in the case of the supplemental brief, inaccurately setting out the terms of the waiver. We have previously admonished counsel regarding such deficiencies. Counsel is WARNED that continued deficient performance may result in the imposition of sanctions, including the denial of payment for services rendered, removal from cases, or disqualification from performing work pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act in cases appealed to this court.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.