Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cesar ESCOBAR-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-11-14
Citations: 21 F. App'x 788
Docket Number: No. 01-10030; D.C. No. CR-00-00078-ACK
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Cesar ESCOBAR-HERNANDEZ, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 21
Pages: 788–789

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Cesar ESCOBAR-HERNANDEZ, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 01-10030.
D.C. No. CR-00-00078-ACK.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued Nov. 5, 2001.
Decided Nov. 14, 2001.
Before KLEINFELD, McKEOWN, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Cesar Escobar-Hernandez appeals from his sentence following his guilty plea conviction for re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.
Escobar-Hernandez contends that Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), requires a remand to the district court because a prior aggravated felony conviction should be a fact determined by a jury and proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Escobar-Hernandez acknowledges that this issue is foreclosed by United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir.2000), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 121 S.Ct. 1503, 149 L.Ed.2d 388 (2001) and raises the issue solely in order to preserve it in the event the Supreme Court decides differently in the future. Thus, we do not consider it further.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.