Case Name: In the Matter of Steve Farrell Weinstock, an Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, Petitioner
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2016-04-20
Citations: 139 A.D.3d 148
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Steve Farrell Weinstock, an Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, Petitioner.
Judges: Mastro, J.P., Rivera, Dillon, Leventhal and Chambers, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 139
Pages: 148–150

Head Matter:
[28 NYS3d 615]
In the Matter of Steve Farrell Weinstock, an Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, Petitioner.
Second Department,
April 20, 2016
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Mitchell T. Borkowsky, Hauppauge (Daniel M. Mitola of counsel), for petitioner.
McDonough & McDonough, LLP, Garden City (Chris Mc-Donough of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Per Curiam.
On April 8, 2015, the respondent pleaded guilty in the Supreme Court, Nassau County, to grand larceny in the second degree, a class C felony, in violation of Penal Law § 155.40 (four counts), criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree, a class D felony, in violation of Penal Law § 170.25, and offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree, a class E felony, in violation of Penal Law § 175.35.
The Grievance Committee now moves to strike the respondent's name from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b), based upon his felony convictions. The respondent's attorney accepted service on behalf of the respondent, and has advised the Court that the respondent does not oppose the Grievance Committee's motion.
Pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (a), the respondent was automatically disbarred and ceased to be an attorney upon his conviction of a felony.
Accordingly, the motion to strike the respondent's name from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law is granted pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b), to reflect the respondent's automatic disbarment as of April 8, 2015.
Mastro, J.P., Rivera, Dillon, Leventhal and Chambers, JJ., concur.
Ordered that the petitioner's motion is granted; and it is further,
Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (a), the respondent, Steve Farrell Weinstock, is disbarred, effective April 8, 2015, and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b); and it is further,
Ordered that the respondent, Steve Farrell Weinstock, shall comply with this Court's rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended, and resigned attorneys (see 22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,
Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, the respondent, Steve Farrell Weinstock, is commanded to desist and refrain from (1) practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk, or employee of another, (2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission, or other public authority, (3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law; and it is further,
Ordered that if the respondent, Steve Farrell Weinstock, has been issued a secure pass by the Office of Court Administration, it shall be returned forthwith to the issuing agency and the respondent shall certify to the same in his affidavit of compliance pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.10 (f).