Case Name: Stevie C. GREATHOUSE, Maxine Devona Greathouse, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CECO CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION LLC, Defendant-Appellee, Manitowoc Cranes, Inc., d/b/a Manitowoc Crane Group, ACR Management LLC, d/b/a Maxine Crane Works, et al., Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-08-28
Citations: 232 F. App'x 957
Docket Number: No. 07-11347
Parties: Stevie C. GREATHOUSE, Maxine Devona Greathouse, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CECO CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION LLC, Defendant-Appellee, Manitowoc Cranes, Inc., d/b/a Manitowoc Crane Group, ACR Management LLC, d/b/a Maxine Crane Works, et al., Defendants.
Judges: Before BIRCH, BLACK and HILL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 232
Pages: 957–957

Head Matter:
Stevie C. GREATHOUSE, Maxine Devona Greathouse, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CECO CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION LLC, Defendant-Appellee, Manitowoc Cranes, Inc., d/b/a Manitowoc Crane Group, ACR Management LLC, d/b/a Maxine Crane Works, et al., Defendants.
No. 07-11347
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Aug. 28, 2007.
Dennis K. Larry, Jason W. Peterson, Clark, Partington, Hart, Larry, Bond, et al., Pensacola, FL, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
John C.S. Pierce, Michael A. Montgomery, Butler Pappas Weihmuller Katz Craig LLP, Mobile, AL, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before BIRCH, BLACK and HILL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Crane operator Stevie Greathouse (Greathouse) filed suit against subcontractor Ceco Concrete Construction, L.L.C. (Ceco) for gross negligence when his left foot above the ankle was amputated while working on a condominium construction site in Santa Rosa Beach, Florida. Both parties agree that, under Florida's workers' compensation statute, Ceco is immune from liability unless Ceco was grossly negligent and its gross negligence was the "major contributing cause of [Great-house's] injury." See Fla. Stat. § 440.10(l)(e), 440.11. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Ceco. Greathouse now appeals.
We have reviewed the record in this case, the briefs and the arguments of counsel contained therein. Based upon the well-written, well-reasoned and published opinion of the district court, we affirm the judgment granting summary judgment for Ceco. See Greathouse v. Ceco Concrete, Construction, L.L.C., No. 5:06cv2-RS-AK, 2007 WL 624550 (N.D.Fla. Feb.23, 2007).
AFFIRMED.