Case Name: Balwant Singh BRAR, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-12-28
Citations: 261 F. App'x 977
Docket Number: Nos. 04-76266, 06-71414
Parties: Balwant Singh BRAR, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 261
Pages: 977–978

Head Matter:
Balwant Singh BRAR, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
Nos. 04-76266, 06-71414.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 20, 2007 .
Filed Dec. 28, 2007.
Balwant Singh Brar, Visalia, CA, for Petitioner.
Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Anh-Thu P. Mai, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Balwant Singh Brar, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of two orders of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") denying his motions to reopen based on changed country conditions. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and deny the petitions for review.
Reviewing for abuse of discretion, Socop-Gonzalez v. INS, 272 F.3d 1176, 1187 (9th Cir.2001) (en banc), we conclude that the BIA acted within its discretion in denying Singh Brar's motions. Neither mo tion included the required supporting affidavits or other evidentiary material. See 8 C.F.R. § 1008.2(c)(1).
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.