Case Name: CARGILL, INCORPORATED, Appellant, v. SUNLIGHT FOODS, INCORPORATED, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-06-18
Citations: 586 So. 2d 370
Docket Number: No. 91-786
Parties: CARGILL, INCORPORATED, Appellant, v. SUNLIGHT FOODS, INCORPORATED, Appellee.
Judges: Before FERGUSON, COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 586
Pages: 370–370

Head Matter:
CARGILL, INCORPORATED, Appellant, v. SUNLIGHT FOODS, INCORPORATED, Appellee.
No. 91-786.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
June 18, 1991.
Rehearing Denied Sept. 16, 1991.
Murai, Wald, Biondo & Moreno and Marianne A. Vos, Miami and Jorge L. Guerra, Coconut Grove, for appellant.
Hunter & Schultz and Steven Schultz, Miami, for appellee.
Before FERGUSON, COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Cargill, Incorporated appeals the trial court's denial of Cargill's motion to extend or maintain a letter of credit.
This case is a companion to Cargill, Inc. v. Sunlight Foods, Inc., (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). The facts are set forth in that opinion. City National Bank conceded below that Cargill, Incorporated had made a timely demand prior to expiration of the letter of credit. In light of that concession and in light of this court's ruling in the companion case cited above, we conclude that the question presented by this appeal is moot.
City National was joined as a party defendant in the proceedings below, but has elected not to participate in this appeal.