Case Name: STATE OF OREGON v. HEDRICK
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1962-12-31
Citations: 233 Or. 135
Docket Number: Docket No. 18439
Parties: STATE OF OREGON v. HEDRICK
Judges: Before McAllister, Chief Justice, and O’Connell, Goodwin, Lusk and Denecke, Justices.
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 233
Pages: 135–136

Head Matter:
Argued December 6,
affirmed December 31, 1962
STATE OF OREGON v. HEDRICK
(Docket No. 18439)
377 P. 2d 323
Charles V. Elliott, Portland, argued the cause and submitted a brief for appellant.
David Robinson, Jr., Deputy District Attorney, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Charles E. Raymond, District Attorney, and Oscar D. Howlett, Deputy District Attorney, Portland.
Before McAllister, Chief Justice, and O’Connell, Goodwin, Lusk and Denecke, Justices.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The defendant, Chester Raymond Hedrick, was indicted in Multnomah county for the crime of assault with intent to commit rape. ORS 163.270. He entered a plea of guilty, and was sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary for an indeterminate term not to exceed 20 years, from which judgment he appeals.
In State v. Jairl, 229 Or 533, 368 P2d 323, we held that when the appeal is from a conviction based upon a plea of guilty this court, because of the restrictions imposed by ORS 138.050, can consider only whether the circuit court has imposed "an excessive fine or excessive, cruel or unusual punishment not proportionate to the offense." Defendant's brief raises no question concerning the punishment imposed on him. His assignments of error attempt to raise other questions which, because of the plea of guilty, we are precluded by ORS 138.050 from considering.
The judgment is affirmed.