Case Name: Laraine Pohle, Appellant, v. Gayle's Store Front Glass & Hardware Supplies, Inc., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1998-05-26
Citations: 250 A.D.2d 828
Docket Number: 
Parties: Laraine Pohle, Appellant, v Gayle’s Store Front Glass & Hardware Supplies, Inc., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 250
Pages: 828–829

Head Matter:
Laraine Pohle, Appellant, v Gayle’s Store Front Glass & Hardware Supplies, Inc., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.
[671 NYS2d 1019]

Opinion:
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of .an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vinik, J.), dated January 31, 1997, as denied her motion to vacate the respondents' notice to take a further deposition of the plaintiff based upon new injuries alleged in her amended verified bill of particulars, and granted that branch of the respondents' cross motion which was to compel the plaintiff to appear at the further deposition based upon the alleged new injuries.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs; and it is further,
Ordered that the plaintiff is directed to submit to a further deposition at a time and place to be specified in a written notice of at least 10 days to be given by the respondents or at such other time and place ás the parties shall agree.
The Supreme Court properly ordered the plaintiff to submit to a further deposition, as her amendment to her verified bill of particulars alleged new injuries (see, Moore v Wheels, Inc., 160 AD2d 493; Germana v Chase Manhattan Bank, 124 AD2d 500, 501). Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Santucci, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.