Case Name: Juan A. ROBAINA, and S.F.C. Investments, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellants, v. GRAN CENTRAL CORPORATION, et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2001-02-21
Citations: 778 So. 2d 487
Docket Number: No. 3D99-2802
Parties: Juan A. ROBAINA, and S.F.C. Investments, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellants, v. GRAN CENTRAL CORPORATION, et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before LEVY and SORONDO, JJ., and NESBITT, Senior Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 778
Pages: 487–487

Head Matter:
Juan A. ROBAINA, and S.F.C. Investments, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellants, v. GRAN CENTRAL CORPORATION, et al., Appellees.
No. 3D99-2802.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 21, 2001.
Lewis R. Cohen, Miami; Podhurst, Or-seck, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow, Olin & Perwin and Joel Eaton, Miami, for appellants.
Hinshaw & Culbertson and David P. Hartnett, Miami, for appellees.
Before LEVY and SORONDO, JJ., and NESBITT, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The plaintiffs, as purchasers, sued the defendants, as sellers, upon a land sale contract seeking a) specific performance, b) damages for breach of contract, and c) damages for unjust enrichment. After hearing oral argument on defendants' motion for summary judgment, the trial court entered final judgment for the sellers, from which the buyers appeal. We find that there are triable issues of fact with respect to the claimed oral modification of the written agreement. Additionally, there are most certainly triable issues of fact with respect to unjust enrichment claim. For these reasons, summary judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.