Case Name: Kathleen O. Hunt, Appellant, v. Christopher J. Pallm, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1995-07-14
Citations: 217 A.D.2d 964
Docket Number: 
Parties: Kathleen O. Hunt, Appellant, v Christopher J. Pallm, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 217
Pages: 964–965

Head Matter:
Kathleen O. Hunt, Appellant, v Christopher J. Pallm, Respondent.
[629 NYS2d 902]

Opinion:
Order affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied plaintiff's motion for a money judgment against defendant for money allegedly due plaintiff pursuant to the terms of a property settlement agreement incorporated but not merged into the parties' judgment of divorce. Plaintiff contends that (1) the agreement of defendant to assume payment of a second mortgage on the parties' marital residence required him to continue making the monthly payments of principal and interest to her even after plaintiff's early discharge of that mortgage, and (2) that, as a surety, she was entitled to enforce the terms of the mortgage upon discharging defendant's debt. There is no merit to plaintiff's contentions.
As a surety, plaintiff was entitled to recover only the amount she paid to the bank (see, Fidelity & Cas. Co. v Finch, 3 AD2d 141, 144) and is subrogated only to the rights and remedies of the bank (see, American Sur. Co. v Town of Islip, 268 App Div 92, 94-95; 63 NY Jur 2d, Guaranty and Suretyship, § 431). It is clear from the record that defendant has paid plaintiff in full pursuant to the terms of the agreement and cannot now be charged for interest on a non-existing debt.
All concur except Denman, P. J., and Pine, J., who dissent and vote to reverse in the following Memorandum.