Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gerald Curtis DELGER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-05-14
Citations: 97 F. App'x 150
Docket Number: No. 03-10288
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Gerald Curtis DELGER, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 97
Pages: 150–151

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Gerald Curtis DELGER, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 03-10288.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 10, 2004.
Decided May 14, 2004.
Michael Thomas Morrissey, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Gerald Curtis Delger, Los Angeles, CA, pro se.
John W. Rood, Attorney at Law, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Gerald Curtis Delger appeals the district court's order revoking his supervised release and imposing an 18-month sentence. He originally pleaded guilty to theft of government property, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Delger has filed a brief stating there are no issues, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief.
Accordingly, we GRANT counsel's motion to withdraw and AFFIRM the district court's judgment.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.