Case Name: UNITED STATES v. ALL AMERICAN AIRWAYS, Inc.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1950-02-17
Citations: 180 F.2d 592
Docket Number: No. 12347
Parties: UNITED STATES v. ALL AMERICAN AIRWAYS, Inc.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 180
Pages: 592–592

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES v. ALL AMERICAN AIRWAYS, Inc.
No. 12347.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Feb. 17, 1950.
Rehearing Denied April 4, 1950.
Theron Lamar Caudle, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ellis N. Slack, Harry Marselli, and Irving I. Axelrad, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., Ernest A. Tolin, U. S. Atty., E. H. Mitchell, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal. for the United States.
Guthrie, Darling & S'hattuck, Los Angeles, Cal. (Hale, Stimson & Russell, New York City, of counsel), for appellee.
Before MATHEWS, STEPHENS and ORR, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This appeal is from a consent judgment— a judgment which was consented to by appellant and appellee, and which the District Court had jurisdiction to render. Such a judgment is not reversible. Pacific R. R. v. Ketchum, 101 U.S. 289, 295, 25 L.Ed. 932; United States v. Babbitt, 104 U.S. 767, 768, 26 L.Ed. 921; Ballot v. United States, 1 Cir., 171 F. 404, 405; Curry v. Curry, 65 App.D.C. 47, 79 F.2d 172, 174; In re 4145 Broadway Hotel Co., 7 Cir., 100 F.2d 7, 8. See, also, Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. United States, 113 U.S. 261, 266, 5 S.Ct. 460, 28 L.Ed. 971; Swift & Co. v. United States, 276 U.S. 311, 327, 48 S.Ct. 311, 72 L.Ed. 587. The judgment appealed from is therefore affirmed.