Case Name: James L. ALSTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE HEARST CORPORATION, a/k/a Hearst Business Communications, Incorporated, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-08-11
Citations: 104 F. App'x 318
Docket Number: No. 03-2414
Parties: James L. ALSTON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. THE HEARST CORPORATION, a/k/a Hearst Business Communications, Incorporated, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 104
Pages: 318–319

Head Matter:
James L. ALSTON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. THE HEARST CORPORATION, a/k/a Hearst Business Communications, Incorporated, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 03-2414.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 26, 2004.
Decided Aug. 11, 2004.
James L. Alston, Appellant pro se. Sarah J. Kromer, James William Haldin, Moore & Van Allen, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
James L. Alston appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Hearst and dismissing Alston's 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court, finding that Alston's action is barred by his execution of a valid release. See Alston v. The Hearst Corporation, No. CA-02-22-3 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 15, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED