Case Name: ST. LOUIS RAMS PARTNERSHIP, Plaintiff, v. The GADDIS G.P., L.L.C., et al., Defendants/Respondents, v. Eric Stisser, et al., Third-Party Defendants
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2008-10-14
Citations: 275 S.W.3d 292
Docket Number: No. ED 90761
Parties: ST. LOUIS RAMS PARTNERSHIP, Plaintiff, v. The GADDIS G.P., L.L.C., et al., Defendants/Respondents, v. Eric Stisser, et al., Third-Party Defendants.
Judges: Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 275
Pages: 292–293

Head Matter:
ST. LOUIS RAMS PARTNERSHIP, Plaintiff, v. The GADDIS G.P., L.L.C., et al., Defendants/Respondents, v. Eric Stisser, et al., Third-Party Defendants.
No. ED 90761.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Oct. 14, 2008.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 24, 2008.
Application for Transfer Denied Feb. 24, 2009.
Lawrence G. Gillespie, Clayton, MO, for appellant.
Al W. Johnson, R. Ryan Kirby, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Vern Stisser appeals the trial court's denial of a motion to set aside a default judgment entered in favor of The Gaddis G.P., L.L.C., et al. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).