Case Name: Gabriel Jock KENON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-07-13
Citations: 764 So. 2d 575
Docket Number: No. SC94991
Parties: Gabriel Jock KENON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 764
Pages: 575–576

Head Matter:
Gabriel Jock KENON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. SC94991.
Supreme Court of Florida.
July 13, 2000.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Anne Moorman Reeves, Assistant Public Defender, Seventh Judicial Circuit, Dayto-na Beach, Florida, for Petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Belle B. Schumann and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorneys General, Day-tona Beach, Florida, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have for review Kenon v. State, 724 So.2d 716 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999), a decision of the Fifth District Court of Appeal citing as controlling authority its opinion in Maddox v. State, 708 So.2d 617 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), approved in part, disapproved in part, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla.2000). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418, 420 (Fla.1981). Because the parties have not adequately briefed the merits of the alleged sentencing errors in this case, we quash the decision below and remand for the district court's consideration in light of our opinion in Maddox.
It is so ordered.
WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
. , We decline to address the other issues raised by Kenon that are not the basis of our jurisdiction. See, e.g., Wood v. State, 750 So.2d 592, 595 n. 3 (Fla.1999); McMullen v. State, 714 So.2d 368, 373 (Fla.1998).