Case Name: Joe Nathan SALES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GREENVILLE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-02-20
Citations: 217 F. App'x 267
Docket Number: No. 06-1446
Parties: Joe Nathan SALES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GREENVILLE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 217
Pages: 267–268

Head Matter:
Joe Nathan SALES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GREENVILLE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 06-1446.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 15, 2007.
Decided: Feb. 20, 2007.
Joe Nathan Sales, Appellant Pro Se. Sean A. Scoopmire, Clarkson, Walsh, Rheney & Terrell, PA, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Joe Nathan Sales appeals the district court's order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to the School District in Sales's employment discrimination suit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sales v. Greenville County Sch. Dist., No. 6:05-cv-00313-HMH (D.S.C. Mar. 31, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.