Case Name: Broderick PATTERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Liam KENNEDY, Eastern Correctional Institution; Dayton Rexrode, Eastern Correctional Institution; Kathleen Green, Warden, Eastern Correctional Institution; Jeffrey Kestler, Sergeant, Eastern Correctional Institution; DAniel Barnes, Captain, Eastern Correctional Institution, Defendants-Appellees, and J. Rolley; LA-Tricia Taylor; Robert Hanke; Christopher McReedy, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-10-24
Citations: 544 F. App'x 173
Docket Number: No. 13-6882
Parties: Broderick PATTERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Liam KENNEDY, Eastern Correctional Institution; Dayton Rexrode, Eastern Correctional Institution; Kathleen Green, Warden, Eastern Correctional Institution; Jeffrey Kestler, Sergeant, Eastern Correctional Institution; DAniel Barnes, Captain, Eastern Correctional Institution, Defendants-Appellees, and J. Rolley; LA-Tricia Taylor; Robert Hanke; Christopher McReedy, Defendants.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 544
Pages: 173–173

Head Matter:
Broderick PATTERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Liam KENNEDY, Eastern Correctional Institution; Dayton Rexrode, Eastern Correctional Institution; Kathleen Green, Warden, Eastern Correctional Institution; Jeffrey Kestler, Sergeant, Eastern Correctional Institution; DAniel Barnes, Captain, Eastern Correctional Institution, Defendants-Appellees, and J. Rolley; LA-Tricia Taylor; Robert Hanke; Christopher McReedy, Defendants.
No. 13-6882.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 22, 2013.
Decided: Oct. 24, 2013.
Broderick Patterson, Appellant pro se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Siobhan Kelly Madison, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Broderick Patterson appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Patterson v. Kennedy, No. 8:11-cv-02487-DKC (D. Md. filed June 25, 2012 & entered June 26, 2012; Apr. 30, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.