Case Name: Frontenac Hotel Company, Inc., Appellant, v. Max Schwarz and Others, Respondents, Impleaded with Rose Peck, as Executrix, etc., of Max Peck, Deceased, Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1931-06
Citations: 236 A.D. 706
Docket Number: 
Parties: Frontenac Hotel Company, Inc., Appellant, v. Max Schwarz and Others, Respondents, Impleaded with Rose Peck, as Executrix, etc., of Max Peck, Deceased, Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 236
Pages: 706–706

Head Matter:
Frontenac Hotel Company, Inc., Appellant, v. Max Schwarz and Others, Respondents, Impleaded with Rose Peck, as Executrix, etc., of Max Peck, Deceased, Defendant.

Opinion:
Judgments reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event. In our opinion, the question of defendants' participation in the alleged conversion should have been submitted to the jury. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Young, J., dissents and votes for affirmance.