Case Name: Porter S. Cook, as Sheriff, etc., et al., v. J. M. Higgins
Court: Kansas Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Kansas
Decision Date: 1903-01-10
Citations: 66 Kan. 762
Docket Number: No. 12,863
Parties: Porter S. Cook, as Sheriff, etc., et al., v. J. M. Higgins.
Judges: 
Reporter: Kansas Reports
Volume: 66
Pages: 762–763

Head Matter:
Porter S. Cook, as Sheriff, etc., et al., v. J. M. Higgins.
No. 12,863.
(71 Pac. 259.)
Error from Shawnee district court; Z. T. Hazen, judge.
Opinion filed January 10, 1903.
Affirmed.
Gleed, Ware da Gleed, and Meservey, Pierce ds German, for plaintiffs in error.
Albert Watkins, and Tetirick c& Rose, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
This was an action of replevin to recover possession of two car-loads of wheat, which were seized by the sheriff while they were in transit. The wheat was attached as the property of J. W. Hawn, but it was claimed by J. M. Higgins. Hawn sold the wheat to the Bank of Blackwell, which in turn sold it to Higgins before it was attached. The main question in the case was the good faith of these transfers. Their validity was upheld by the jury upon what seems to us to be sufficient testimony. So far as the freight charges and the claims of a carrier's lien are concerned the sheriff did not base his right on such a claim, and on the trial he stated that the freight charges had been paid. The seizure of the grain of Higgins on process directed against Hawn was wrongful, and the writ which the sheriff held and served afforded no justification for his tortious act. By reason of this wrongful action he is not in a position to claim a lien, nor can any one be subrogated to a lien through him.
We find nothing substantial in the objections to rulings on evidence, in charging the jury, or upon special findings returned by the jury; nor is there anything in the case requiring extended comment.
The judgment will be affirmed.