Case Name: Mark Anthony BARNES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David WHITTED, Deputy Assistant Commonwealth Attorney; H.K. Reveley, Jr., Private Attorney, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-05-07
Citations: 520 F. App'x 232
Docket Number: No. 12-8164
Parties: Mark Anthony BARNES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David WHITTED, Deputy Assistant Commonwealth Attorney; H.K. Reveley, Jr., Private Attorney, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before AGEE, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 520
Pages: 232–232

Head Matter:
Mark Anthony BARNES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David WHITTED, Deputy Assistant Commonwealth Attorney; H.K. Reveley, Jr., Private Attorney, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 12-8164.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 24, 2013.
Decided: May 7, 2013.
Mark Anthony Barnes, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff W. Rosen, Pender & Coward, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee David Whitted.
Before AGEE, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Mark Anthony Barnes appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Barnes v. Whitted, No. 1:12— cv-01340-LMB-IDD, 2012 WL 5956327 (E.D.Va. Nov. 27, 2012). We deny Barnes's motions to appoint counsel, dismiss a party, for production of documents, to hold a settlement conference and to amend a cause of action. Finally, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.