Case Name: Lance Conway WOOD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Keith YORDY, Ex-Deputy Warden at Idaho State Correctional Institution (ISCI); et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-12-14
Citations: 357 F. App'x 872
Docket Number: No. 09-35594
Parties: Lance Conway WOOD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Keith YORDY, Ex-Deputy Warden at Idaho State Correctional Institution (ISCI); et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 357
Pages: 872–872

Head Matter:
Lance Conway WOOD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Keith YORDY, Ex-Deputy Warden at Idaho State Correctional Institution (ISCI); et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 09-35594.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 17, 2009.
Filed Dec. 14, 2009.
Lance Conway Wood, Boise, ID, pro se.
Michael Joseph Elia, Brady James Hall, Moore Baskin and Elia LLP, Boise, ID, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Idaho state prisoner Lance Wood appeals pro se from the district court's order denying his motion for a preliminary injunction in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that prison officials retaliated against him for exercising his right to access the courts. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.
We express no view on the merits of the complaint. Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying preliminary injunctive relief. The Lands Council v. McNair, 537 F.3d 981, 986 (9th Cir.2008); see Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 365, 374, 172 L.Ed.2d 249 (2008) (listing factors for district court to consider). We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order denying the preliminary injunction.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.