Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James M. Tiedeken, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2016-11-09
Citations: 144 A.D.3d 846
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James M. Tiedeken, Appellant.
Judges: Balkin, J.R, Chambers, Roman, Duffy and Barros, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 144
Pages: 846–847

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James M. Tiedeken, Appellant.
[40 NYS3d 275]

Opinion:
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered June 6, 2014, convicting him of assault in the second degree and driving while intoxicated in violation of Vehicle Traffic Law § 1192 (3), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), and we have also reviewed the defendant's pro se supplemental brief. Upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).
Balkin, J.R, Chambers, Roman, Duffy and Barros, JJ., concur.