Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel Carson LEWIS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-09-01
Citations: 421 F.3d 1152
Docket Number: No. 03-30281
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel Carson LEWIS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before HALL, KLEINFELD, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 421
Pages: 1152–1153

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel Carson LEWIS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 03-30281.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Filed Sept. 1, 2005.
Teresa S. Ridle and Rebecca S. Copeland, Patton Boggs, LLP, Anchorage, AK, for the defendant-appellant.
Karen Loeffler, Assistant United States Attorney, Anchorage, AK, for the plaintiff-appellee.
Before HALL, KLEINFELD, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.
We considered this case in July of 2004 and we affirmed the convictions and the sentence. United States v. Lewis, 111 Fed.Appx. 876 (9th Cir.2004). The Supreme Court granted certiorari, and vacated the decision and remanded the case to us in light of United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Lends v. United States, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 1404, 161 L.Ed.2d 175 (2005). Because Petitioner did not challenge his sentence on Sixth Amendment grounds in the district court, we grant a limited remand pursuant to United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez, 419 F.3d 906, 915-16 (9th Cir.2005) (holding that "defendants are entitled to limited remands in all pending direct criminal appeals involving unpreserved Booker error, whether constitutional or nonconstitutional").
REMANDED.