Case Name: Robert J. Shea, Plaintiff, v. Gloria P. Benjamin, Defendant. (Supreme Court, Kings County- Action No. 1.); Gloria P. Benjamin, Appellant, v. Robert Shea, Respondent. (Supreme Court, Kings County- Action No. 2.); Gloria P. Benjamin, Plaintiff, v. Robert Shea, Defendant. (Municipal Court of City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, 1st Dist.- Action No. 3.)
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1949-09-26
Citations: 275 A.D.2d 1003
Docket Number: 
Parties: Robert J. Shea, Plaintiff, v. Gloria P. Benjamin, Defendant. (Supreme Court, Kings County — Action No. 1.) Gloria P. Benjamin, Appellant, v. Robert Shea, Respondent. (Supreme Court, Kings County — Action No. 2.) Gloria P. Benjamin, Plaintiff, v. Robert Shea, Defendant. (Municipal Court of City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, 1st Dist.— Action No. 3.)
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 275
Pages: 1003–1004

Head Matter:
Robert J. Shea, Plaintiff, v. Gloria P. Benjamin, Defendant. (Supreme Court, Kings County — Action No. 1.) Gloria P. Benjamin, Appellant, v. Robert Shea, Respondent. (Supreme Court, Kings County — Action No. 2.) Gloria P. Benjamin, Plaintiff, v. Robert Shea, Defendant. (Municipal Court of City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, 1st Dist.— Action No. 3.)

Opinion:
That the parties are represented by different attorneys is insufficient to warrant denial of the motion to consolidate the actions, all of which present the same issues of negligence and contributory negligence. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.