Case Name: King Development Company et al., Appellants, v. Franklin County Board of Revision et al., Appellees; Chatterton Club, L.P., Appellant, v. Franklin County Board of Revision et al., Appellees; C.O.A. Housing, Inc., Appellant, v. Van Wert County Board of Revision et al., Appellees
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1997-05-21
Citations: 78 Ohio St. 3d 483
Docket Number: Nos. 96-541, 96-542 and 96-545
Parties: King Development Company et al., Appellants, v. Franklin County Board of Revision et al., Appellees. Chatterton Club, L.P., Appellant, v. Franklin County Board of Revision et al., Appellees. C.O.A. Housing, Inc., Appellant, v. Van Wert County Board of Revision et al., Appellees.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 78
Pages: 483–484

Head Matter:
King Development Company et al., Appellants, v. Franklin County Board of Revision et al., Appellees. Chatterton Club, L.P., Appellant, v. Franklin County Board of Revision et al., Appellees. C.O.A. Housing, Inc., Appellant, v. Van Wert County Board of Revision et al., Appellees.
[Cite as King Dev. Co. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision (1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 483.]
(Nos. 96-541, 96-542 and 96-545
Submitted April 1, 1997
Decided May 21, 1997.)
Todd W. Sleggs, for appellants King Development Co., Crofton Partners I, Crofton Partners II, Chatterton Club, L.P., and C.O.A. Housing, Inc.
James R. Gorry, Assistant County Prosecutor, for appellees Franklin County Board of Revision and Franklin County Auditor and Van Wert County Board of Revision and Van Wert Auditor.
Teaford, Rich, Coffman & Wheeler, Jeffrey A. Rich and Karol Cassell Fox, for appellees Board of Education of the Reynoldsburg City School District Board of Education and the Groveport Madison Local School District Board of Education.

Opinion:
Sua sponte, the causes are consolidated. The orders of the Board of Tax Appeals are affirmed on the authority of Sharon Village Ltd. v. Licking Cty. Bd. of Revision (1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 479, 678 N.E.2d 932, decided today.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.