Case Name: Douglas Paul MARCELLO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee, v. John Marcello, Third Party Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-03-04
Citations: 414 F. App'x 560
Docket Number: No. 10-1866
Parties: Douglas Paul MARCELLO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee, v. John Marcello, Third Party Defendant.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 414
Pages: 560–560

Head Matter:
Douglas Paul MARCELLO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee, v. John Marcello, Third Party Defendant.
No. 10-1866.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 28, 2011.
Decided: March 4, 2011.
Douglas Paul Marcello, Appellant Pro Se. Geoffrey John Klimas, Kathleen E. Lyon, Kenneth W. Rosenberg, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Douglas Marcello appeals the district court's orders dismissing his complaint against the Internal Revenue Service for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, upholding the Commissioner's assessment of a trust fund recovery penalty against him, and reducing the assessment to judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Marcello v. Internal Rev. Serv., No. 1:08-cv-02796-RDB (D. Md. Apr. 21, May 3 & Nov. 12, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.