Case Name: UNION HOMESTEAD ASSOCIATION vs. M. J. CASTAING & CO. ET ALS.
Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1911-03-15
Citations: 8 Teiss. 349
Docket Number: 5284
Parties: UNION HOMESTEAD ASSOCIATION vs. M. J. CASTAING & CO. ET ALS.
Judges: 
Reporter: Decisions, Court of Appeal, parish of Orleans (Teissier)
Volume: 8
Pages: 349–352

Head Matter:
5284
(Court of Appeal, Parish of Orleans.)
UNION HOMESTEAD ASSOCIATION vs. M. J. CASTAING & CO. ET ALS.
March 15, 1911.
On Motion to Dismiss.
When a motion to dismiss fails to comply with the rules of this court, it will not be taken up in limine, but consideration of it will be postponed until the cause is submitted on its merits.
Motion to dismiss denied without prejudice.
Appeal from Civil District Court, Division “ C. ”
Carroll & Carroll, for plaintiff and appellant.
Gr. Lemle, Titclie & Rogers, H. Gr. Stewart, L. Saxon, A. M. Buchmann, Jos. ’Lautenschlaeger, Butler, Stafford, Lambert & Robinson, Benedict, H. M. Ansley, Gr. H. Terriberry, Rice & Montgomery, Lazarus, Michel & Lazarus, H. L. Favrot, Mrs. J. B. Gessner, for defendants and appellees.

Opinion:
GODCHAUX, J.
One of the several appellees, H. F. Lewis & Co., has moved to- dismiss the appeal, but its motion is not accompanied by briefs as required by Rule 9 of this court. A iconsideration of the motion consequently will not be taken up in limine, but will be postponed until the cause is submitted on its merits.
N. O. Lighting Co. vs. Mrs. A. Leitz, Jr., 6 Court of Appeal 143; Clements vs. Testard, 6 Court of Appeal 177.
The motion to dismiss the appeal is accordingly denied without prejudice.
Where's question of law has once been decided by this- Court, and a writ of review has been applied for thereon and denied by the Supreme Court, the point will be considered, finally settled,, at least as to this Court, and will not be re-examined here.