Case Name: L. C. FRASER, Petitioner, v. L. W. CUMMINGS, as City Clerk, etc., Respondent
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1920-07-14
Citations: 48 Cal. App. 796
Docket Number: Civ. No. 3520
Parties: L. C. ERASER, Petitioner, v. L. W. CUMMINGS, as City Clerk, etc., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports
Volume: 48
Pages: 796–797

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 3520.
First Appellate District, Division Two.
Two.July 14, 1920.]
L. C. ERASER, Petitioner, v. L. W. CUMMINGS, as City Clerk, etc., Respondent.
Elections — Becall—Suppiciency op Petition. — Petition denied and alternative writ discharged on the authority of Fraser v. Cummings, ante, p. 504.
PROCEEDING in Mandamus to compel a city clerk to certify a recall petition. Petition denied and alternative writ discharged.
This case presents the same issues as those involved in Fraser v. Cummings, ante, p. 504.
De Lancey C. Smith for Petitioner.
H. L. Hagan, City Attorney, and T. J. Ledwieh, Deputy City Attorney, for Respondent.

Opinion:
THE COURT.
— The above-entitled cause presents the same issues as those involved in Fraser v. Cummings, ante, p. 504, [192 Pac. 100], and for the reasons therein given the petition is denied and the alternative writ discharged.