Case Name: C.E. HOLLOWAY and Juanita Holloway, Appellants, v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-02-07
Citations: 557 So. 2d 611
Docket Number: No. 89-0006
Parties: C.E. HOLLOWAY and Juanita Holloway, Appellants, v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Appellees.
Judges: DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and LETTS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 557
Pages: 611–611

Head Matter:
C.E. HOLLOWAY and Juanita Holloway, Appellants, v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Appellees.
No. 89-0006.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb. 7, 1990.
Rehearing and Certification Denied March 29, 1990.
Brent M. Rosenthal of Baron & Budd, P.C., Dallas, Tex., and Louis S. Robles of A Professional Ass’n, Miami, for appellants.
Raymond T. Elligett, Jr. of Shackleford, Farrior, Stallings & Evans, P.A., Tampa, for Appellees, Armstrong World Industries, Inc., GAF Corp., Owens-Corning Fiberglas, and Keene Corp.
Robert A. Hannah and Henry W. Jewett, II of Hannah, Marsee, Beik & Voght, Orlando for Appellees, Owens-Illinois, Inc., Pittsburgh-Corning Corp. and Fibreboard Industries.
Grey Redditt, Jr. and Deborah Davidson of Inge, Twitty, Duffy, Prince & McKean, Mobile, Ala., for Appellee, H.K. Porter Co., Inc.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
REVERSED. We agree with appellants that the record reflects the existence of an issue of fact as to whether their claim is time barred. See Colon v. Celotex Corp., 465 So.2d 1332 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984) quashed on other grounds, 523 So.2d 141 (Fla.1988); Ash v. Stella, 457 So.2d 1377 (Fla.1984).
DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and LETTS, JJ., concur.