Case Name: Craig J. HATTIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doris Galmiche NETHERY, Individually; Doris Galmiche Nethery, As the Limited Curatrix of James, "Jackie," J. Galmiche; Wilbert Glen Nethery, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-01-16
Citations: 213 F. App'x 363
Docket Number: No. 06-30221
Parties: Craig J. HATTIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doris Galmiche NETHERY, Individually; Doris Galmiche Nethery, As the Limited Curatrix of James, “Jackie,” J. Galmiche; Wilbert Glen Nethery, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before JONES, Chief Judge, WIENER and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 213
Pages: 363–363

Head Matter:
Craig J. HATTIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doris Galmiche NETHERY, Individually; Doris Galmiche Nethery, As the Limited Curatrix of James, “Jackie,” J. Galmiche; Wilbert Glen Nethery, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 06-30221.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Jan. 16, 2007.
Craig J. Hattier, pro se.
Theodore S. Owers, III, Carver, Darden, Koretzky, Tessier Finn, Blossman & Areaux, New Orleans, LA, for DefendantsAppellees.
Before JONES, Chief Judge, WIENER and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Our review of the record on appeal and the arguments set forth in the briefs of counsel convince us that Plaintiff-Appellant Craig J. Hattier has failed to state any claim that is cognizable under federal law.
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.