Case Name: Kenneth SUITTER, d/b/a Sound Investment, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HOLIDAY INN SOUTHWEST, Defendant-Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1993-11-09
Citations: 864 S.W.2d 436
Docket Number: No. 63233
Parties: Kenneth SUITTER, d/b/a Sound Investment, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HOLIDAY INN SOUTHWEST, Defendant-Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 864
Pages: 436–437

Head Matter:
Kenneth SUITTER, d/b/a Sound Investment, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HOLIDAY INN SOUTHWEST, Defendant-Respondent.
No. 63233.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Nov. 9, 1993.
Beach, Burcke, Heifers & Waltrip, P.C., David G. Waltrip, St. Louis, for plaintiff-appellant.
James A. Fredericks, Clayton, for defendant-respondent.
Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff, Kenneth Suitter d/b/a Sound Investment, brought an action against defendant, Holiday Inn Southwest, seeking injunc-tive relief and damages for the alleged breach of a non-competition agreement in an employment contract between him and defendant. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court, in a court-tried case, in favor of defendant.
We have reviewed the record on appeal. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).