Case Name: Joseph HILL, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Martin CORCORAN, et al., Respondents/Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-03-21
Citations: 895 S.W.2d 310
Docket Number: No. 67101
Parties: Joseph HILL, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Martin CORCORAN, et al., Respondents/Respondents.
Judges: Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 895
Pages: 310–310

Head Matter:
Joseph HILL, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Martin CORCORAN, et al., Respondents/Respondents.
No. 67101.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
March 21, 1995.
Rick Barry, Clayton, for appellant.
Craig Biesterfield, Robert Schulz, St. Louis, for respondents.
Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Joseph Hill, Petitioner, appeals from the denial of his application to recover disability benefits from the City of Maplewood's Policemen's and Firemen's Retirement Fund, claiming total and permanent disability from a duty-related injury. The Board of Trustees denied Petitioner's claim, finding Petitioner's injury was not sustained while performing his duties as a fireman. The Board's decision was affirmed by the Circuit Court. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal and find the decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. We affirm in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).