Case Name: Mary R. ROULLOT, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, and William McDonald and Annie McDonald, as Administrators, Defendants in Error
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1926-11-19
Citations: 15 F.2d 1018
Docket Number: No. 84
Parties: Mary R. ROULLOT, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, and William McDonald and Annie McDonald, as Administrators, Defendants in Error.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 15
Pages: 1018–1018

Head Matter:
Mary R. ROULLOT, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, and William McDonald and Annie McDonald, as Administrators, Defendants in Error.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
November 19, 1926.)
No. 84.
Wood, Molloy & Prance, of New York City (Melville J. Prance, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff in error.
Emory R. Buckner, U. S. Atty., of New York City (John M. Ryan, Asst. U. S. Atty., and James T. Brady, both of New York City, of counsel), for the United States.
Dills & Towsley, of New York City (Prank H. Towsley, of New York City, of counsel), for administrators.
Before HOUGH, MANTON, and HAND, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In principle this ease is
governed by United States v. Sterling (C. C. A.) 12 F.(2d) 921.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.