Case Name: George D. MAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-09-15
Citations: 976 S.W.2d 597
Docket Number: No. 73904
Parties: George D. MAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before JAMES R. DOWD, P.J., and CRAHAN and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 976
Pages: 597–597

Head Matter:
George D. MAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 73904.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Sept. 15, 1998.
Irene Earns, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Karen L. Kramer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before JAMES R. DOWD, P.J., and CRAHAN and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
George May, Movant, filed a Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following his guilty plea to first degree sodomy in violation of section 566.062, RSMo 1994, and rape of a child in violation of section 566.030, RSMo Cum.Supp.1993. The motion court denied the motion without a hearing. Movant appeals this judgment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a brief memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).