Case Name: IN RE: TJ PLAZA LLC, Debtor, TJ Plaza, LLC; DSWC, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. U.S. Bank NA, as Trustee on behalf of the Registered Holders of Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2003-C6, Defendant-Appellee. In re: TJ Plaza, LLC, Debtor, TJ Plaza, LLC; DSWC, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. U.S. Bank NA, as Trustee on behalf of the Registered Holders of Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2003-C6, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-04-24
Citations: 689 F. App'x 553
Docket Number: No. 15-16968, No. 15-16969
Parties: IN RE: TJ PLAZA LLC, Debtor, TJ Plaza, LLC; DSWC, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. U.S. Bank NA, as Trustee on behalf of the Registered Holders of Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2003-C6, Defendant-Appellee. In re: TJ Plaza, LLC, Debtor, TJ Plaza, LLC; DSWC, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. U.S. Bank NA, as Trustee on behalf of the Registered Holders of Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2003-C6, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and FERNANDEZ-and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 689
Pages: 553–554

Head Matter:
IN RE: TJ PLAZA LLC, Debtor, TJ Plaza, LLC; DSWC, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. U.S. Bank NA, as Trustee on behalf of the Registered Holders of Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2003-C6, Defendant-Appellee. In re: TJ Plaza, LLC, Debtor, TJ Plaza, LLC; DSWC, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. U.S. Bank NA, as Trustee on behalf of the Registered Holders of Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2003-C6, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 15-16968, No. 15-16969
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 18, 2017 San Francisco, California
Filed April 24, 2017
Zachariah Larson, Esquire, Matthew C. Zirzow, Esquire, Larson & Zirzow, Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiffs-Appellants
Blakeley E. Griffith, Esquire, Attorney, Kelly Harrison Dove, Esquire, Attorney, Charles E. Gianelloni, Attorney, Robert Richard Kinas, Esquire, Attorney, Snell & Wilmer, LLP, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellee
Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and FERNANDEZ-and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
We dismiss these consolidated appeals because the appellants were the prevailing parties in the district court, and there is nothing in the judgment that can be reformed on appeal. "A party may not appeal from a judgment or decree in his favor, for the purpose of obtaining a review of findings he deems erroneous which are not necessary to support the decree." United States v. Good Samaritan Church, 29 F.3d 487, 488 (9th Cir. 1994) (quoting Elec. Fittings Corp. v. Thomas & Betts Co., 307 U.S. 241, 242, 59 S.Ct. 860, 83 L.Ed. 1263 (1939)). There is no exception to the general rule here because "[determinations which are immaterial to the judgment below have no preclusive effect on subsequent litigation, especially if they cannot be appealed" and because, "[t]o the extent that the district court order was not favorable to appellants, it does not bind them in subsequent litigation." Id. at 489.
These consolidated appeals are DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.