Case Name: Pedro Mauricio Chanax SAQUIC, aka Antonio Vargas Parra, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General; Ronald Smith, Acting Phoenix District Director of the Immigration and Naturalization Service; Immigration and Naturalization Service, Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-07-11
Citations: 68 F. App'x 862
Docket Number: No. 02-17266; D.C. No. CV-02-01652-EHC
Parties: Pedro Mauricio Chanax SAQUIC, aka Antonio Vargas Parra, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General; Ronald Smith, Acting Phoenix District Director of the Immigration and Naturalization Service; Immigration and Naturalization Service, Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 68
Pages: 862–863

Head Matter:
Pedro Mauricio Chanax SAQUIC, aka Antonio Vargas Parra, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General; Ronald Smith, Acting Phoenix District Director of the Immigration and Naturalization Service; Immigration and Naturalization Service, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 02-17266.
D.C. No. CV-02-01652-EHC.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted July 8, 2003.
Decided July 11, 2003.
Before KOZINSKI, FERNANDEZ, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) appeals an order granting a preliminary injunction that directed the INS's Acting Director of the Office of Juvenile Affairs (the Attorney General's designee) to consent to jurisdiction of a state court juvenile dependency proceeding for Pedro Mauricio Chanax-Saquic as part of the process he had begun for seeking special immigrant juvenile status pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(27)(J). No stay was sought. The INS consented, the state court held a dependency hearing, and a dependency order was issued. In these circumstances, the appeal is moot. Accordingly, it is dismissed.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.