Case Name: Belinda WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-10-24
Citations: 33 S.W.3d 595
Docket Number: No. ED 77254
Parties: Belinda WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., P.J., MARY RHODES RUSSELL, J„ and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 33
Pages: 595–595

Head Matter:
Belinda WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 77254.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Oct. 24, 2000.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 29, 2000.
Application for Transfer Denied Jan. 23, 2001.
S. Paige Canfield, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Krista D. Boston, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., P.J., MARY RHODES RUSSELL, J„ and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Belinda Williams (Movant) files this appeal challenging the denial of her Rule 29.15 motion without a hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).