Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Trunnell Levett PRICE and Arnold Lewis Coffey, Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1973-08-17
Citations: 484 F.2d 485
Docket Number: Nos. 71-3038, 71-3039
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Trunnell Levett PRICE and Arnold Lewis Coffey, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 484
Pages: 485–487

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Trunnell Levett PRICE and Arnold Lewis Coffey, Appellants.
Nos. 71-3038, 71-3039.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Aug. 17, 1973.
Rehearing Denied in No. 71-3039 Aug. 17, 1973.
Artie Henderson, Huntington, Bryans, Harper, Henderson, Burney & Newman-Crawford, San Diego, Cal., for appellants.
Harry D. Steward, U. S. Atty., James W. Meyers, Robert H. Filsinger, Asst. U. S. Attys., San Diego, Cal., for appel-lee.
Before ELY and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and D. WILLIAMS, District Judges.
Central District of California, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
ORDER
On request of a member of the court who was not a member of the panel, proceedings were commenced in April 1973 to obtain a vote of the court to consider the case en banc.
All members of the court in active service have considered the request for en banc consideration. A majority of the court has rejected the request.
Judge Wallace, with whom Judges Wright Trask, Choy, and Goodwin concur, files an opinion dissenting from the rejection of en banc consideration. Chief Judge Chambers files a special concurrence in the refusal to consider the case en banc.