Case Name: IN RE: YAN SUI, Debtor. Yan Sui, Appellant, v. Richard Alan Marshack, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-05-18
Citations: 691 F. App'x 365
Docket Number: No. 15-60065
Parties: IN RE: YAN SUI, Debtor. Yan Sui, Appellant, v. Richard Alan Marshack, Appellee.
Judges: Before: REINHARDT, LEAVY, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Bankruptcy Reporter
Volume: 572
Pages: 365–366

Head Matter:
IN RE: YAN SUI, Debtor. Yan Sui, Appellant, v. Richard Alan Marshack, Appellee.
No. 15-60065
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 8, 2017
Filed May 18, 2017
Yan Sui, Pro Se
Chad V. Haes, Attorney, Marshack Hays LLP, Irvine, CA, for Appellee
Before: REINHARDT, LEAVY, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument.
See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Chapter 7 debtor Yan Sui appeals pro se from an order of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel ("BAP") dismissing as moot Sui's appeal of the bankruptcy court's order approving the sale of real property. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de novo the BAP's determination that a bankruptcy appeal is moot. Nat'l Mass Media Telecomm. Sys., Inc. v. Stanley (In re Nat'l Mass Media Telecomm. Sys., Inc.), 152 F.3d 1178, 1180 (9th Cir. 1998). We affirm.
The BAP properly dismissed Sui's appeal as moot because the property at issue was conveyed to a third party which prevented the BAP from granting effective relief. See id. at 1180-81 (affirming dismissal on the basis of mootness where the sale of the property to a non-party prevented the court from granting effective relief).
Because Sui's appeal is moot, we do not consider his arguments addressing the underlying merits of the appeal.
All pending requests and motions are denied.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.