Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Frank B. Ryder, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1997-05-05
Citations: 239 A.D.2d 364
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Frank B. Ryder, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 239
Pages: 364–365

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Frank B. Ryder, Appellant.
[657 NYS2d 998]

Opinion:
Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (Weissman, J.), imposed February 28, 1996, the resentence being an indeterminate term of three to six years imprisonment, upon his conviction of assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict.
Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.
The resentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
The defendant's contention that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel at the trial is not properly before this Court. Alleged errors committed at the trial may not be raised on an appeal from a resentence, regardless of whether or not they were raised on the appeal from the original judgment (see, People v Tatta, 196 AD2d 328, 332; People v Cahill, 190 AD2d 744, 745; People v Ennis, 119 AD2d 689; People v Manino, 90 AD2d 777). Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.