Case Name: Blumberger, Appellant, v. Nowotavska
Court: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1926-04-30
Citations: 88 Pa. Super. 33
Docket Number: Appeal No. 33
Parties: Blumberger, Appellant, v. Nowotavska.
Judges: Before Porter, P. J., Henderson, Trexler, Keller, Linn, Gawthrop and Cunningham, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania Superior Court Reports
Volume: 88
Pages: 33–34

Head Matter:
Blumberger, Appellant, v. Nowotavska.
Argued April 14, 1926.
Before Porter, P. J., Henderson, Trexler, Keller, Linn, Gawthrop and Cunningham, JJ.
John L. Getty, for appellant.
E. Walker Smith, for appellee.
April 30, 1926:

Opinion:
Per Curiam,
This case was tried below with Blumberger v. Bernot, No. 34, April T., 1926, and was argued here with the appeal in that case.
The questions raised are substantially the same, though an additional assignment of error was printed in. the brief. It does not require separate discussion.
No assignments of error were filed as required by Rule 60; for that reason, and as stated in the opinion this day filed in Blumberger v. Bemot, (supra) this appeal is dismissed.