Case Name: BALTIMORE & O. R. CO., v. HAROLD et al.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1906-02-17
Citations: 142 F. 1037
Docket Number: No. 1,482
Parties: BALTIMORE & O. R. CO., v. HAROLD et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter
Volume: 142
Pages: 1037–1037

Head Matter:
BALTIMORE & O. R. CO., v. HAROLD et al.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
February 17, 1906.)
No. 1,482.
In error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio. Arrel, McVey, Rowland & Harrington and Allen, Water & Andress, for plaintiff in error.
Young & Wanamaker, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Judgment of the Circuit Court affirmed, with costs, on the authority of the former opinion of this court. 133 Fed. 384.