Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Santino WALKER, Defendant/Appellant; Santino WALKER, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-03-17
Citations: 972 S.W.2d 295
Docket Number: Nos. 69442, 72083
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Santino WALKER, Defendant/Appellant. Santino WALKER, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GRIMM, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 972
Pages: 295–296

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Santino WALKER, Defendant/Appellant. Santino WALKER, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 69442, 72083.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
March 17, 1998.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 27,1998.
Application for Transfer Denied Aug. 25,1998.
Deborah B. Wafer, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., David R. Truman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before GRIMM, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant, Santino Walker, appeals from the trial court's judgment entered after his jury conviction for first degree murder, Section 565.020.1 RSMo (1994), and armed criminal action, Section 571.015 RSMo (1994). Defendant also appeals the denial of his motion to vacate judgment and sentence pursuant to Rule 29.15.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose.
The judgments of the trial court and the motion court are affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).