Case Name: Diane BERNAL, Eric Bernal, Sarah Bernal and Jared Bernal, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Gregory BERNAL, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-03-21
Citations: 14 S.W.3d 658
Docket Number: No. ED 76096
Parties: Diane BERNAL, Eric Bernal, Sarah Bernal and Jared Bernal, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Gregory BERNAL, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., J. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 14
Pages: 658–658

Head Matter:
Diane BERNAL, Eric Bernal, Sarah Bernal and Jared Bernal, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Gregory BERNAL, Defendant/Respondent.
No. ED 76096.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
March 21, 2000.
Todd N. Hendrickson, Lozano & Hen-drickson, L.C., Clayton, for appellants.
Crystal Y. Smith, Law Office of W. James Nabholz, III, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., J. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiffs appeal from the trial court's entry of judgment in defendant's favor in accord with the verdict in plaintiffs' wrongful death action. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).