Case Name: Patricia PICCA, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2011-12-09
Citations: 75 So. 3d 829
Docket Number: No. 2D10-6106
Parties: Patricia PICCA, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
Judges: DAVIS, KELLY, and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 75
Pages: 829–830

Head Matter:
Patricia PICCA, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 2D10-6106.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Dec. 9, 2011.
Kelly L. Rooth and Shannon McLin Carlyle of Carlyle Law Firm, The Villages, for Appellant.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Patricia Picea appeals the summary denial of her motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, which the postconviction court denied as untimely. We affirm. See Barrios-Cruz v. State, 63 So.3d 868 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011). As in Barrios-Cruz, 63 So.3d at 870, we hold that Padilla v. Kentucky, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), does not apply retroactively in postconviction proceedings and we certify to the Florida Supreme Court the following question of great public importance pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(a)(2)(A)(v):
SHOULD THE RULING IN Padilla v. Kentucky, - U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), BE APPLIED RETROACTIVELY IN POSTCONVICTION PROCEEDINGS?
Affirmed.
DAVIS, KELLY, and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.