Case Name: David E. MOORE, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SUN BANK OF NORTH FLORIDA, N.A., a Florida Corporation, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1992-01-31
Citations: 953 F.2d 1274
Docket Number: No. 88-4018
Parties: David E. MOORE, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SUN BANK OF NORTH FLORIDA, N.A., a Florida Corporation, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, HATCHETT, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH and DUBINA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 953
Pages: 1274–1274

Head Matter:
David E. MOORE, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SUN BANK OF NORTH FLORIDA, N.A., a Florida Corporation, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 88-4018.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Jan. 31, 1992.
Susan G. Sparks, Smith, Currie & Hancock, J. Thomas Kilpatrick, Atlanta, Ga., for defendant-appellant.
Miriam R. Eisenstein, U.S. Dept, of Justice, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae.
S. Grier Wells, Brant, Moore, Sapp, MacDonald & Wells, P.A., W. Scott Cole, Jacksonville, Fla., for plaintiff-appellee.
M. David Gelfand, Appellate Advocacy Program, Tulane Law School, Terry E. All-britton, New Orleans, La., for amicus curiae.
Senior U.S. Circuit Judges James C. Hill and Thomas a Clark have elected to participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(c).

Opinion:
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, HATCHETT, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH and DUBINA, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A member of this court m active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.