Case Name: Herbert WINDSOR and Baeda E. Windsor, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1950-09-01
Citations: 184 F.2d 184
Docket Number: No. 12468
Parties: Herbert WINDSOR and Baeda E. Windsor, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 184
Pages: 184–184

Head Matter:
Herbert WINDSOR and Baeda E. Windsor, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 12468.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit
Sept. 1, 1950.
Perry P, Yohe, North Hollywood, Cal., for appellant.
Frank J. Plennessy, U. S. Atty., Rudolph J. Scholz, Asst. U. S. Atty.,-San Francisco, Cal., for appellee. ■ •
Before MATHEWS and ORR, Circuit Judges, and LEMMON, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The question presented by this appeal is whether the District Court's findings of fact are clearly erroneous. See Rule 52(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. They are not. The judgment appealed from is therefore affirmed.