Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bernard MIDDLETON, a/k/a Cass, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-03-11
Citations: 316 F. App'x 245
Docket Number: No. 09-6036
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Bernard MIDDLETON, a/k/a Cass, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 316
Pages: 245–245

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Bernard MIDDLETON, a/k/a Cass, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 09-6036.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 19, 2009.
Decided: March 11, 2009.
Bernard Middleton, Appellant Pro Se. James L. Trump, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appel-lee.
Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Bernard Middleton appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Middleton, No. 1:92-cr-00348-CMH-3 (E.D. Va. Dec. 9, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.