Case Name: WASHINGTON v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1913-05-07
Citations: 156 S.W. 1172
Docket Number: 
Parties: WASHINGTON v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 156
Pages: 1172–1172

Head Matter:
WASHINGTON v. STATE.
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
May 7, 1913.)
Criminal Law (§ 1090*)—APPEAL—RECORD-SUFFICIENCY.
On appeal in a criminal case, where the record contains neither a bill of exceptions nor a statement of facts, the motion for a new trial presents nothing that can be reviewed.
[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2653, 2789, 2803-2822, 2825-2827, 2927, 2928, 2948, 3204; Dec. Dig. §. 1090.*]
Appeal from District Court, Bexar County; W. S. Anderson, Judge.
Emmett Washington was convicted of burglary, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Opinion:
HARPER,' J.
Appellant was prosecuted and convicted of burglary, and his punishment assessed at two years' confinement in the penitentiary.
As there is no bill of exceptions nor statement of facts in the record, there is nothing presented in the motion for new trial that we can review.
The judgment is affirmed.