Case Name: Lori B. NAUGLE, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Leonard NAUGLE, Respondent/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-01-09
Citations: 41 S.W.3d 528
Docket Number: No. ED 77601
Parties: Lori B. NAUGLE, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Leonard NAUGLE, Respondent/Appellant.
Judges: Before MARY K. HOFF, C.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and ROBERT E. CRIST, Sr.J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 41
Pages: 528–528

Head Matter:
Lori B. NAUGLE, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Leonard NAUGLE, Respondent/Appellant.
No. ED 77601.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Jan. 9, 2001.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Feb. 22, 2001.
Application to Transfer Denied April 24, 2001.
Jeffrey R. Kays, The Copeland Law Firm, Columbia, for respondent.
David L. Baylard, Christopher W. Jensen, Baylard, Billington & Dempsey, P.C., Union, for appellant.
Before MARY K. HOFF, C.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and ROBERT E. CRIST, Sr.J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a judgment that permitted mother to relocate with her two minor children from Columbia, Missouri to Warrensburg, Missouri, and that denied father's motion to modify custody as a result of the relocation. The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a written memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).