Case Name: The State ex rel. Clark, Appellant, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellee
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1999-01-20
Citations: 84 Ohio St. 3d 357
Docket Number: No. 97-2484
Parties: The State ex rel. Clark, Appellant, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellee.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 84
Pages: 357–357

Head Matter:
The State ex rel. Clark, Appellant, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellee.
[Cite as State ex rel. Clark v. Indus. Comm,. (1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 357.]
(No. 97-2484
Submitted November 10, 1998
Decided January 20, 1999.)
Elliott, Heller, Maas, Moro & Magill Co., L.P.A., and Richard L. Magill, for appellant.
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Gerald H. Waterman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Stewart Jajfy & Associates Co., L.P.A., Stewart R. Jajfy, Marc J. Jajfy and Lynn S. Jajfy, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers.

Opinion:
The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed. A writ of mandamus directing the Industrial Commission to vacate its denial of compensation for the total loss of the second finger and to enter an order granting that compensation is allowed.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.