Case Name: Orlando ALFARO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; D. Stephens; Mack Bonner; Maite Serrano-Mercado, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-07-25
Citations: 440 F. App'x 207
Docket Number: No. 11-6300
Parties: Orlando ALFARO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; D. Stephens; Mack Bonner; Maite Serrano-Mercado, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 440
Pages: 207–208

Head Matter:
Orlando ALFARO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; D. Stephens; Mack Bonner; Maite Serrano-Mercado, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 11-6300.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 21, 2011.
Decided: July 25, 2011.
Orlando Alfaro, Appellant pro se. Edward D. Gray, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Ap-pellees.
Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Orlando Alfaro appeals the district court's order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), and the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2671-2680. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Alfaro v. United States, No. 5:09-ct-3073-D (E.D.N.C. Feb. 8, 2011). We also deny Alfaro's motion to extend or stay the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.