Case Name: ANTONY S. RUDDY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. UNITED ASSOCIATION JOURNEYMEN PLUMBERS, &c., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1911-03-06
Citations: 81 N.J.L. 574
Docket Number: 
Parties: ANTONY S. RUDDY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. UNITED ASSOCIATION JOURNEYMEN PLUMBERS, &c., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 81
Pages: 574–574

Head Matter:
ANTONY S. RUDDY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. UNITED ASSOCIATION JOURNEYMEN PLUMBERS, &c., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR.
Submitted December 5, 1910
Decided March 6, 1911.
On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 50 Yroom 467.
For the plaintiffs in error, Joseph A. Beecher and Samuel Kalisch.
For the defendant in error, Samuel Press and Harry Kalisch.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion of Mr. Justice Reed in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance-—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Bogert, AAre-DENBURGH, AAllOOM, CONGDON, SULLIVAN, JJ. 12.
For reversal—None.