Case Name: IN the INTEREST OF N.F.F., a child Danielle Tinquist, L.S.W., Cass County Social Services, Petitioner and Appellee v. N.F.F., a child, M.F., father, and Lisa Borseth, Guardian ad Litem, Respondents and H.T., mother, Respondent and Appellant In the Interest of N.F.F., a child Danielle Tinquist, L.S.W., Cass County Social Services, Petitioner and Appellee v. N.F.F., a child, M.F., father, and Lisa Borseth, Guardian ad Litem, Respondents and H.T., mother, Respondent and Appellant In the Interest of N.C.T., a child Danielle Tinquist, L.S.W., Cass County Social Services, Petitioner and Appellee v. N.C.T., a child, M.F., father, and Lisa Borseth, Guardian ad Litem, Respondents and H.T., mother, Respondent and Appellant
Court: North Dakota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: North Dakota
Decision Date: 2018-07-11
Citations: 913 N.W.2d 768
Docket Number: No. 20180219; No. 20180220; No. 20180221
Parties: IN the INTEREST OF N.F.F., a child
Judges: 
Reporter: North Western Reporter 2d
Volume: 913
Pages: 768–768

Head Matter:
IN the INTEREST OF N.F.F., a child
Danielle Tinquist, L.S.W., Cass County Social Services, Petitioner and Appellee
v.
N.F.F., a child, M.F., father, and Lisa Borseth, Guardian ad Litem, Respondents
and
H.T., mother, Respondent and Appellant
In the Interest of N.F.F., a child
Danielle Tinquist, L.S.W., Cass County Social Services, Petitioner and Appellee
v.
N.F.F., a child, M.F., father, and Lisa Borseth, Guardian ad Litem, Respondents
and
H.T., mother, Respondent and Appellant
In the Interest of N.C.T., a child
Danielle Tinquist, L.S.W., Cass County Social Services, Petitioner and Appellee
v.
N.C.T., a child, M.F., father, and Lisa Borseth, Guardian ad Litem, Respondents
and
H.T., mother, Respondent and Appellant
No. 20180219
No. 20180220
No. 20180221
Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Filed July 11, 2018
Constance L. Cleveland, Assistant State's Attorney, Fargo, ND, for petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief.
Daniel E. Gast, Fargo, ND, for respondent and appellant; submitted on brief.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
[¶1] H.T. appealed from a juvenile court order terminating her parental rights to N.F.F., N.F.F., and N.C.T. The juvenile court found the children are deprived, the conditions and causes of the deprivation are likely to continue, the children are suffering or will probably suffer serious harm in the future, and that reasonable efforts were made to keep the family together. On appeal, the mother argues there was not clear and convincing evidence to support a termination of her parental rights. We conclude the juvenile court's findings are supported by clear and convincing evidence and are not clearly erroneous. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Jerod E. Tufte
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Jon J. Jensen