Case Name: Gary WILSON, Appellant, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1994-06-23
Citations: 638 So. 2d 205
Docket Number: No. 93-1601
Parties: Gary WILSON, Appellant, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, Appellee.
Judges: ZEHMER, C.J., and KAHN and BENTON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 638
Pages: 205–205

Head Matter:
Gary WILSON, Appellant, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, Appellee.
No. 93-1601.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
June 23, 1994.
Appellant, pro se.
John N. Hogenmuller, Asst. General Counsel, Tallahassee, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Gary Wilson appeals the denial of a petition for writ of mandamus. He seeks to be declared eligible for consideration for control release from state prison, where he is serving concurrent sentences after convictions for lewd, lascivious or indecent acts or assaults upon a child under the age of sixteen. We have today addressed the issue raised by Wilson's appeal in Gramegna v. State, 638 So.2d 205 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994), and have certified the following question to the Supreme Court of Florida as one of great public importance:
WHETHER AN ARRESTING OFFICER'S AFFIDAVIT MAY BE USED TO DENY CONTROL RELEASE ELIGIBILITY, UNDER SECTION 947.-146(3)(C), FLORIDA STATUTES (1993), WHERE THE INFORMATION, INDICTMENT, BILL OF PARTICULARS AND JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION DO NOT ESTABLISH A DISQUALIFYING CONVICTION?
The denial of the petition for writ of mandamus is affirmed and the question is certified to the Supreme Court of Florida.
ZEHMER, C.J., and KAHN and BENTON, JJ., concur.