Case Name: Mamiye & Hidary et al. v. United States
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1940-04-17
Citations: 4 Cust. Ct. 801
Docket Number: No. 4875; Entry No. 863468, etc.
Parties: Mamiye & Hidary et al. v. United States
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Volume: 4
Pages: 801–802

Head Matter:
Mamiye & Hidary et al. v. United States
No. 4875.
Entry No. 863468, etc.
Invoices dated Swatow, China, March 8, 1937, etc.
Certified March 9, 1937, etc.
Entered at New York April 29, 1937, etc.
(Decided April 17, 1940)
Strauss & Hedges for the plaintiffs.
Webster J. Oliver, Assistant Attorney General (Daniel I. Auster, special attorney) , for the defendant.

Opinion:
TilsoN, Judge:
The appeals to reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon a stipulation to the effect that the prices at the dates of exportation of the involved merchandise at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of China for export to the United States, in usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including all costs, charges, and expenses specified in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, are the appraised values, less any amount added under duress.
Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact, and following the applicable law, I find and hold the proper dutiable export values of the merchandise' covered by said appeals to be the values found by the appraiser, less any amount added under duress. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.