Case Name: John W. WATSON, III, et al., Appellants, v. Jean INMAN d/b/a Jean Inman Real Estate, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-04-28
Citations: 596 So. 2d 1282
Docket Number: No. 91-2134
Parties: John W. WATSON, III, et al., Appellants, v. Jean INMAN d/b/a Jean Inman Real Estate, Appellee.
Judges: Before BASKIN, FERGUSON and GERSTEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 596
Pages: 1282–1283

Head Matter:
John W. WATSON, III, et al., Appellants, v. Jean INMAN d/b/a Jean Inman Real Estate, Appellee.
No. 91-2134.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 28, 1992.
Stuzin and Camner, and Mark E. Pollack, Miami, for appellants.
Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith & Cutler, and Eric C. Christu, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
Before BASKIN, FERGUSON and GERSTEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellants complain that relief from execution, in the form of a stay on an ore tenus motion, was granted the appellee without compliance with Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.550(b). The record is devoid of the required motion for stay, notice of hearing and order granting a stay based on evidence and applicable substantive law. See Valdosta Milling Co. v. Garretson, 54 So.2d 196 (Fla.1951); H. Trawick, Florida Practice and Procedure, Relief from Executions § 27-2 (1991 ed.).
For the reasons stated, the stay is vacated and the cause is remanded for further consistent proceedings.