Case Name: Kareef CHERRINGTON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE o/b/o Jeanine SANTIAGO, Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2011-12-14
Citations: 75 So. 3d 424
Docket Number: No. 3D11-2733
Parties: Kareef CHERRINGTON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE o/b/o Jeanine SANTIAGO, Respondent.
Judges: Before CORTINAS and ROTHENBERG, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 75
Pages: 424–424

Head Matter:
Kareef CHERRINGTON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE o/b/o Jeanine SANTIAGO, Respondent.
No. 3D11-2733.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 14, 2011.
Martin Genet, Miami, for petitioner.
No appearance for respondent.
Before CORTINAS and ROTHENBERG, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of petitioner's application for prohibition seeking the disqualification of the trial judge, this Court issued a rule to show cause why that relief should not be granted. Neither the respondent, who was ordered, nor the trial judge, who was invited to do so, has replied. Upon consideration, we conclude that the petition for prohibition should be and is hereby granted. We are sure that it will not be necessary to issue the formal writ.
Prohibition granted.