Case Name: H. W. RAGLAND v. Chas. O. AUSTIN, Commissioner of Banking; W. R. FULLER v. SAME; T. L. WILSON v. SAME; R. W. SWANK v. SAME; J. W. HARRISON v. SAME; Harry ABRAM v. SAME
Court: Texas Courts of Civil Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1926-04-09
Citations: 284 S.W. 330
Docket Number: Nos. 1343, 1345-1347, 1349, and 1350
Parties: H. W. RAGLAND v. Chas. O. AUSTIN, Commissioner of Banking. W. R. FULLER v. SAME. T. L. WILSON v. SAME. R. W. SWANK v. SAME. J. W. HARRISON v. SAME. Harry ABRAM v. SAME.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 284
Pages: 330–330

Head Matter:
H. W. RAGLAND v. Chas. O. AUSTIN, Commissioner of Banking. W. R. FULLER v. SAME. T. L. WILSON v. SAME. R. W. SWANK v. SAME. J. W. HARRISON v. SAME. Harry ABRAM v. SAME.
(Nos. 1343, 1345-1347, 1349, and 1350.)
(Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Beaumont.
April 9, 1926.
Rehearing Denied May 19, 1926.)
Mantooth & Denman, of Lufkin, for appellants.
Eairchild & Redditt, of Lufkin, for appellee.

Opinion:
O'QUINN, J.
The above cases are companion cases to Markus v. Austin, 284 S. W. 326. The facts are the same and questions of law identical. What we have said in Markus v. Austin disposes of the issues raised in each of these cases, and, for the reasons there stated, the judgment in each of these eases is affirmed.