Case Name: Copeland v. Hurwitz, Appellant
Court: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1928-04-26
Citations: 93 Pa. Super. 355
Docket Number: Appeal No. 1
Parties: Copeland v. Hurwitz, Appellant.
Judges: Before Henderson, Keller, Linn, G-awthrop and Cunningham, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania Superior Court Reports
Volume: 93
Pages: 355–357

Head Matter:
Copeland v. Hurwitz, Appellant.
Argued March 7, 1928.
Before Henderson, Keller, Linn, G-awthrop and Cunningham, JJ.
James K. Peck, and with him Ralph W. Rymer, for appellant,
cited: Tiffany Real Property, volume 1, section 118; Painter v. Painter, 220 Pa, 82; Cooper’s Estate, 206 Pa. 628; Seeds v. Burke, 181 Pa. 281; Hannum v. Spear, 2 Dallas 291; Hupp v. Union Coal Company, 284 Pa. 529; Davidson v. Bright, 267 Pa. 580; Lloyd’s Estate, 5 D. & C. Reports 719; Swift’s Appeal, 87 Pa. 502.
Herbert L. Taylor, Jr., and with him Herbert L. Taylor and William R. Lewis, for appellee,
cited: McKean Justice Nokes v. Smith, 1 Yeates 238; Act of June 7th, 1917, P. L. 476; Hunts Appeal, 105 Pa. 128; Peterson’s Appeal, 88 Pa. 389; Potts v. Brenneman, 182 Pa. 295.
April 26, 1928:

Opinion:
Opinion by
Henderson, J.,
This case is in the form of an amicable action on an agreed state of facts and involves the marketability of the title of the undivided one-half of a parcel of land located in the City of Scranton, Lackawanna County, Pennsylvania. The defendant contracted in writing to buy from the plaintiff the land referred to. The title of the latter was acquired by deed of Anna B. Davidson, executrix of the will of C. P. Davidson, dated December 12, 1925, and recorded in Lackawanna County. The question presented for consideration in the case stated is whether the said executrix had authority to convey the land discharged of the debts of the decedent. The latter left to survive him a widow and ten children. Conveyance by the executrix to the plaintiff was under the authority said to be granted in the will of the testator. The defendant refused to accept the conveyance tendered by the plaintiff on the ground that a large indebtedness existed against the estate, and that the executrix was without specific direction to sell land.
The same will was under consideration in a ease arising out of a prior sale of a part of the decedent's land; Davidson's Executrix v. Bright, 267 Pa. 580. The opinion filed in that case contains an extended discussion of the power of an executor to convey free from the encumbrance of debts of a decedent and sustains the validity of the title granted by the executrix of C. P. Davidson's will. We regard it as a controlling authority in the case before us. The opinion of the court below was in accord "with the decision referred to and the judgment appealed from is affirmed.