Case Name: Emma MALONE, by and through her father and next friend, James MALONE, James Malone, individually, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MARSHALL COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Lowell Smith, Amy Holcomb, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-12-05
Citations: 209 F. App'x 898
Docket Number: No. 06-13969
Parties: Emma MALONE, by and through her father and next friend, James MALONE, James Malone, individually, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MARSHALL COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Lowell Smith, Amy Holcomb, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before TJOFLAT, DUBINA and CARNES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 209
Pages: 898–899

Head Matter:
Emma MALONE, by and through her father and next friend, James MALONE, James Malone, individually, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MARSHALL COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Lowell Smith, Amy Holcomb, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 06-13969
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Dec. 5, 2006.
Howard Edgar Howard, Ford, Howard & Cornett, P.C., Gadsden, AL, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
Katherine C. Hortberg, Mark S. Board-man, Boardman, Carr, Weed & Hutcheson, P.C., Chelsea, AL, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before TJOFLAT, DUBINA and CARNES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
In its Memorandum Opinion of June 29, 2006, the district court granted appellees summary judgment on alternative holdings: (1) appellants failed to establish the substantive due process right alleged in their complaint; and (2) assuming they established such right, appellants failed to show that the right was clearly established at the time of appellees' actions. Appellants now appeal the court's ruling. As we agree with the district court's alternative holdings (for the reasons the court gave in its June 29 order), we affirm the court's judgment.
AFFIRMED.