Case Name: Horace W. Barton, respondent, v. Robert Caterson, appellant
Court: New York Superior Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1885-02-02
Citations: 19 Jones & S. 538
Docket Number: 
Parties: Horace W. Barton, respondent, v. Robert Caterson, appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Reports of cases argued and determined in the Superior Court of the city of New York
Volume: 51
Pages: 538–538

Head Matter:
Horace W. Barton, respondent, v. Robert Caterson, appellant.
Decided February 2, 1885.
Appeal by defendant from an order denying his motion for a further bill of particulars.
Augustus O. Brown, for appellant.
Richard S. Newcombe, for respondent.
Before Sedgwick, Oh. J., Truax and O’Gorman, JJ.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
As it is not manifest that the court should have used its discretion, otherwise than by denying the motion, the order is affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to be taxed.