Case Name: Michael J. BUCKLEY and Daniel Buckley, infants, etc., respondents, v. Loretta BUCKLEY et al., respondents; Alois J. Hofacker, appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1916-04-25
Citations: 158 N.Y.S. 1109
Docket Number: 
Parties: Michael J. BUCKLEY and Daniel Buckley, infants, etc., respondents, v. Loretta BUCKLEY et al., respondents; Alois J. Hofacker, appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 158
Pages: 1109–1109

Head Matter:
Michael J. BUCKLEY and Daniel Buckley, infants, etc., respondents, v. Loretta BUCKLEY et al., respondents; Alois J. Hofacker, appellant.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
April 25, 1916.)

Opinion:
Motion for resettlement of order granted. The proper expenses of the purchaser in examining the title should be charged against the interest of the infant plaintiffs in the subject-matter of the action.