Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mary Mae HARVEY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1983-07-22
Citations: 711 F.2d 144
Docket Number: No. 82-1298
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mary Mae HARVEY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 711
Pages: 144–145

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mary Mae HARVEY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 82-1298.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
July 22, 1983.
David Taylor Shannon, Asst. Federal Public Defender, Phoenix, Ariz., for Harvey.
Thomas Schoppert, New Town, N.D., for Chase.
A. Melvin McDonald, U.S. Atty., Susan A. Ehrlich, Phoenix, Ariz., Robert Zimmerman, Asst. U.S. Atty., Billings, Mont., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before TRASK, ANDERSON, and CAN-BY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
The panel in the above case, 701 F.2d 800, has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc.
The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges of the court in regular active service have voted not to grant rehearing en banc. Fed.R.App.P. 35(b).
The petition for rehearing is denied and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is rejected.