Case Name: ROSE K. CROWE, A/K/A ROSE K. DE GIOIA, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. SERGIO DE GIOIA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1986-03-12
Citations: 102 N.J. 50
Docket Number: 
Parties: ROSE K. CROWE, A/K/A ROSE K. DE GIOIA, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. SERGIO DE GIOIA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 102
Pages: 50–57

Head Matter:
ROSE K. CROWE, A/K/A ROSE K. DE GIOIA, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. SERGIO DE GIOIA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT.
Argued February 3, 1986
Decided March 12, 1986.
Gary N. Skoloff argued the cause for appellant and cross-respondent (Skoloff and Wolfe, attorneys).
Anthony B. Vignuolo argued the cause for respondent and cross-appellant (Borrus, Goldin, Foley, Vignuolo, Hyman, and Stahl, attorneys; Anthony B. Vignuolo, Martin S. Goldin, and Leslie Jeddis Lang, on the brief).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Long, reported at 203 N.J.Super. 22 (1985).