Case Name: Charles W. EZELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2010-07-06
Citations: 313 S.W.3d 744
Docket Number: No. WD 70532
Parties: Charles W. EZELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before THOMAS H. NEWTON, C.J., JAMES EDWARD WELSH, and GARY D. WITT, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 313
Pages: 744–744

Head Matter:
Charles W. EZELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 70532.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
July 6, 2010.
Laura G. Martin, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant.
Jayne T. Woods, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before THOMAS H. NEWTON, C.J., JAMES EDWARD WELSH, and GARY D. WITT, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Mr. Charles W. Ezell appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Mr. Ezell asserts that trial counsel was ineffective for causing the introduction of damaging credibility evidence.
For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).