Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lennell DYCHES, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-08-27
Citations: 614 F. App'x 671
Docket Number: No. 15-6517
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lennell DYCHES, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before GREGORY and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 614
Pages: 671–671

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lennell DYCHES, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-6517.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 20, 2015.
Decided and Amended: Aug. 27, 2015.
Lennell Dyches, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before GREGORY and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Lennell Dyches appeals the district court's order denying his self-styled "Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 60(b)(6) Motion for Reconsideration of Sentence" as a successive and unauthorized 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion, and denying his motions for transcripts at government expense, to review the original "wet-ink" signature on his plea agreement, and for an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Dyches, No. 8:06-cr-00136-JFA-1 (D.S.C. Apr. 2, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented' in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.