Case Name: Donald GAMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mark SELING; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-12-15
Citations: 114 F. App'x 940
Docket Number: No. 03-35428; D.C. No. CV-00-05637-RBL
Parties: Donald GAMER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Mark SELING; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before GOODWIN, WALLACE, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 114
Pages: 940–941

Head Matter:
Donald GAMER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Mark SELING; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
No. 03-35428.
D.C. No. CV-00-05637-RBL.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 6, 2004.
Decided Dec. 15, 2004.
Donald Gamer, MICC-McNeil Island Corrections Center, Steilacoom, WA, pro se.
Timothy Norman Lang, Esq., Office of the Attorney General Assistant Attorney General, Olympia, WA, for DefendantsAppellees.
Before GOODWIN, WALLACE, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Donald Gamer, who is civilly committed as a violent sexual predator at the Special Commitment Center in Washington state, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, alleging that he was deprived of mental health care treatment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1131 (9th Cir.2000) (en banc), and we affirm for the reasons stated by the Magistrate Judge in his re port and recommendation adopted by the district court on April 28, 2003.
We have considered Gamer's contentions and find them unpersuasive.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.