Case Name: CHAN NGUN YUK et al. v. WHITE, Immigration Com'r.; LEE CHOY v. SAME; CHUN WOI SAN v. UNITED STATES; DULLAH et al. v. WHITE, Immigration Com'r.; QUAN KAY v. SAME
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1916-01-10
Citations: 228 F. 1019
Docket Number: Nos. 2706, 2701, 2694, 2700, 2707
Parties: CHAN NGUN YUK et al. v. WHITE, Immigration Com’r. LEE CHOY v. SAME. CHUN WOI SAN v. UNITED STATES. DULLAH et al. v. WHITE, Immigration Com’r. QUAN KAY v. SAME.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter
Volume: 228
Pages: 1019–1020

Head Matter:
CHAN NGUN YUK et al. v. WHITE, Immigration Com’r. LEE CHOY v. SAME. CHUN WOI SAN v. UNITED STATES. DULLAH et al. v. WHITE, Immigration Com’r. QUAN KAY v. SAME.
(Circuit Court of Appeals. Ninth Circuit.
January 10, 1916.)
Nos. 2706, 2701, 2694, 2700, 2707.

Opinion:
Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the First Division of the Northern District of California.
Jno. W. Preston, U. S. Atty., and Casper A. Ornbaum, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.
On motion of counsel for appellees, appeals dismissed for the noncompliance by the appel-. lants with the provisions of subdivision 1 of rule 16 of the Rules of Practice of this court (the, appellant in each ease having failed to file a record thereof and to docket the case by or before the return day required by' said rule).