Case Name: In the Matter of Frank A. Walker (Also Known as Frank Alexander Walker), an Attorney, Respondent. Association of the Bar of the City of New York, Petitioner
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1951-12-11
Citations: 279 A.D. 177
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Frank A. Walker (Also Known as Frank Alexander Walker), an Attorney, Respondent. Association of the Bar of the City of New York, Petitioner.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 279
Pages: 177–178

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Frank A. Walker (Also Known as Frank Alexander Walker), an Attorney, Respondent. Association of the Bar of the City of New York, Petitioner.
First Department,
December 11, 1951.
Frank H. Gordon (George G. Hunter, Jr., with him on the brief), for petitioner.
Carson De Witt Baker for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Respondent has been charged with receiving from clients various sums of money to be expended for specific purposes; the moneys were not disbursed for such purposes and. were not returned to the clients although demand was made therefor. Respondent also received a cash retainer to prosecute an action for divorce, he performed no services and failed to return $100 of the fee received. Altogether there is involved a total of $287. Respondent failed to appear before the Official Referee and no testimony was presented on his behalf. His absence was explained by counsel who stated that respondent was physically and mentally unfit to offer testimony because of chronic alcoholism. In the absence of testimony by or in behalf of respondent, the Official Referee found the charges had been sustained.
In the circumstances, respondent should be suspended until the further order of this, court, with leave to respondent at the end of a period of two years, to apply for reinstatement upon a satisfactory showing that he has complied with the suspension order of this court to be entered herein and that the suspension should be lifted.
Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Shientag, JJ., concur.
Respondent suspended until the further order of this court, with leave to respondent at the end of a period of two years, to apply for reinstatement upon a satisfactory showing that he has complied with the suspension order of this court entered herein and that the suspension should be lifted.