Case Name: People ex rel. Ward, Appellant, v. Purroy et al., Fire Commissioners, Respondents
Court: New York Court of Common Pleas
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1892-03-07
Citations: 18 N.Y.S. 953
Docket Number: 
Parties: People ex rel. Ward, Appellant, v. Purroy et al., Fire Commissioners, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 18
Pages: 953–953

Head Matter:
People ex rel. Ward, Appellant, v. Purroy et al., Fire Commissioners, Respondents.
(Common Pleas of New York City and County,
General Term.
March 7, 1892.)
Motion by relator (appellant) for reargument. Denied.
For decision on certiorari, see 16 R. Y. Supp. 954, mem.
Argued before Bookstaver, Bischoff, and Pryor, JJ.
L. J. Grant, for relator. Wm. L. Findley, for respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
To entitle appellant to reargument of the appeal herein, it must be made to appear that some question, decisive of the case, and which was presented by counsel upon the argument, has been overlooked by the court, or that the decision is inconsistent with some statute, or with a controlling decision, to which the attention of the court was not drawn through the neglect or inadvertence of counsel, (rule 16 of the general term of this •court;) and, as there is not even a pretense that either of the foregoing grounds exists, this motion must be denied. Motion for reargument denied, with $10 "costs.