Case Name: Mary Lee COLEMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1970-02-04
Citations: 230 So. 2d 725
Docket Number: No. 69-423
Parties: Mary Lee COLEMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: WALDEN, McCAIN and REED, JJ„ concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 230
Pages: 725–726

Head Matter:
Mary Lee COLEMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 69-423.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.
Feb. 4, 1970.
Michael Sigman, Orlando, for appellant.
Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles W. Musgrove, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and heard oral argument. On the basis thereof we are convinced that if error occurred with respect to the introduction of a fingerprint card and testimony relating thereto it was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. We, therefore, affirm the judgment and sentence from which this appeal has been taken. Chapman v. State of California, 1967, 386 U.S. 18, 87 S.Ct. 824, 17 L.Ed.2d 705, 24 A.L.R.3d 1065 and Section 924.33, F.S. 1967, F.S.A.
Affirmed.
WALDEN, McCAIN and REED, JJ" concur.