Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Manuel VASQUEZ-MEZA, aka, Manuel Meza, et al., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-12-28
Citations: 22 F. App'x 880
Docket Number: No. 01-10089; D.C. No. CR-00-01088-ROS
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jose Manuel VASQUEZ-MEZA, aka, Manuel Meza, et al., Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 22
Pages: 880–880

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jose Manuel VASQUEZ-MEZA, aka, Manuel Meza, et al., Defendant—Appellant.
No. 01-10089.
D.C. No. CR-00-01088-ROS.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 17, 2001.
Decided Dec. 28, 2001.
Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, TROTT, and PAEZ, and, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Jose Vasquez-Meza appeals his guilty plea conviction and the 61 month sentence imposed for being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Vasquez-Meza's attorney has moved to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), on the ground that the appeal presents no colorable issues. Vasquez-Meza filed a supplemental pro se brief.
As part of his plea agreement, Vasquez-Meza waived his right to appeal the judgment and sentence. Because he received a sentence consistent with the plea agreement, and there is no evidence that the waiver of the right to appeal was not knowing or was not voluntary, we enforce the waiver and dismiss the appeal. United States v. Aguilar-Muniz, 156 F.3d 974, 976 (9th Cir.1998).
Because our independent review of the record discloses no arguable issues, counsel's motion to withdraw is granted and the appeal is
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.