Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lorenzo SOTELO-CAMACHO, a.k.a. Lorenzo Camacho, a.k.a. Lorenzo Sotelo, Defendant-Appellant; United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lorenzo Sotelo-Camacho, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-02-13
Citations: 217 F. App'x 872
Docket Number: Nos. 05-16146, 05-16158
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lorenzo SOTELO-CAMACHO, a.k.a. Lorenzo Camacho, a.k.a. Lorenzo Sotelo, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lorenzo Sotelo-Camacho, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before BLACK, CARNES and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 217
Pages: 872–873

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lorenzo SOTELO-CAMACHO, a.k.a. Lorenzo Camacho, a.k.a. Lorenzo Sotelo, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lorenzo Sotelo-Camacho, Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 05-16146, 05-16158
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Feb. 13, 2007.
Mary Erickson, Decatur, GA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Jane Wilcox Swift, Amy Levin Weil, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Before BLACK, CARNES and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Mary Erickson, appointed counsel for Lorenzo Sotelo-Camacho in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation of the appellant supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Sotelo-Camacho's conviction, revocation of supervised release, and sentences are AFFIRMED.