Case Name: Jesse Ronnie STRICKLAND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2011-03-18
Citations: 56 So. 3d 906
Docket Number: No. 5D11-18
Parties: Jesse Ronnie STRICKLAND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: PALMER, TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 56
Pages: 906–907

Head Matter:
Jesse Ronnie STRICKLAND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D11-18.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
March 18, 2011.
Jesse R. Strickland, Crawfordville, pro se.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison Leigh Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Strickland appeals from the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief. Although Strickland has designated his motion as being filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800, the trial court treated his motion as a rule 3.850 motion and denied same as untimely. We affirm, except as to Strickland's claim that the trial court's oral pronouncement of sentence with regard to costs conflicted with the written judgment.
The Florida Supreme Court has held that an alleged discrepancy between the orally pronounced sentence and the written judgment of sentence is cognizable in a Rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. Williams v. State, 957 So.2d 600 (Fla.2007). The State concedes that, as to this issue, reversal is required because the trial court failed to attach documentation to its order conclusively refuting Strickland's claim.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.
PALMER, TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.