Case Name: Robert Scott REYNOLDS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles A. DANIELS, Warden; John Ashcroft, Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-01-14
Citations: 85 F. App'x 616
Docket Number: No. 03-35365; D.C. No. CV-03-00329-HJF
Parties: Robert Scott REYNOLDS, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Charles A. DANIELS, Warden; John Ashcroft, Attorney General, Respondents—Appellees.
Judges: Before GRABER, TALLMAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 85
Pages: 616–616

Head Matter:
Robert Scott REYNOLDS, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Charles A. DANIELS, Warden; John Ashcroft, Attorney General, Respondents—Appellees.
No. 03-35365.
D.C. No. CV-03-00329-HJF.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 8, 2004.
Decided Jan. 14, 2004.
Christine Stebbins Dahl, Esq., FPDORFederal Public Defender’s Office, Portland, OR, for Petitioner-Appellant.
Britannia I. Hobbs, AUS, USPO-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Portland, OR, for Respondent-Appellee.
Before GRABER, TALLMAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
ORDER
Because the appellant has been entirely released from the custody of the Bureau of Prisons, his habeas petition is moot. Without prejudice to appellant's ability to file a timely complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the appeal is DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.