Case Name: Daniel P. Osterling, Doing Business as Columbia Stone Company, Appellant, v. Adelaide H. C. Frick and Others, as Executors, etc., Impleaded with Childs Frick, as Executor, etc., Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1921-11
Citations: 199 A.D. 919
Docket Number: 
Parties: Daniel P. Osterling, Doing Business as Columbia Stone Company, Appellant, v. Adelaide H. C. Frick and Others, as Executors, etc., Impleaded with Childs Frick, as Executor, etc., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 199
Pages: 919–919

Head Matter:
Daniel P. Osterling, Doing Business as Columbia Stone Company, Appellant, v. Adelaide H. C. Frick and Others, as Executors, etc., Impleaded with Childs Frick, as Executor, etc., Respondent.

Opinion:
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on the authority of Helme v. Buckelew (229 N. Y. 363). Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Page, Merrell and Greenbaum, JJ.