Case Name: THOMPSON v. DUNNINGTON
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1910-02-28
Citations: 176 F. 1023
Docket Number: No. 941
Parties: THOMPSON v. DUNNINGTON.
Judges: Before PRITCHARD, Circuit Judge, and BOYD and DAYTON, District Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter
Volume: 176
Pages: 1023–1023

Head Matter:
THOMPSON v. DUNNINGTON.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
February 28, 1910.)
No. 941.
On Petition to Superintend and Revise, in Matter of Law, Proceedings of the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond.
George Bryan and E. B. Thom-ason (Thomason & Minor, on the briefs), for petitioner.
J. T. Coleman (Coleman, Easley & Coleman, on the briefs), for respondent.
Before PRITCHARD, Circuit Judge, and BOYD and DAYTON, District Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
After careful consideration of this record, we are clearly of the opinion that the alleged errors sought to be revised and corrected present not alone questions of law but of fact, and should, therefore, have been brought here by appeal; but, while we reach this conclusion, we nevertheless realize the case has been properly determined on its merits. Coder, Trustee, v. Aris, 213 U. S. 223, 29 Sup. Ct. 436, 53 L. Ed. 772; Steiner v. Marshall, 140 Fed. 710, 72 C. C. A. 103; Kenova L. & T. Co. v. Graham, 135 Fed. 717, 68 C. C. A. 355. Petition dismissed.