Case Name: SINCLAIR REFINING CO., a corporation, Petitioner, v. Margaret Scott BUTLER, as Administratrix of the estate of Warren E. Butler, Deceased, and J. P. Canington, Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1965-10-20
Citations: 190 So. 2d 313
Docket Number: No. 34347
Parties: SINCLAIR REFINING CO., a corporation, Petitioner, v. Margaret Scott BUTLER, as Administratrix of the estate of Warren E. Butler, Deceased, and J. P. Canington, Respondents.
Judges: THORNAL, C. J., THOMAS, ROBERTS, and O’DONNELL, JJ., and 'TROWBRIDGE, Circuit Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 190
Pages: 313–320

Head Matter:
SINCLAIR REFINING CO., a corporation, Petitioner, v. Margaret Scott BUTLER, as Administratrix of the estate of Warren E. Butler, Deceased, and J. P. Canington, Respondents.
No. 34347.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Oct. 20, 1965.
On Rehearing Sept. 28, 1966.
Scott, McCarthy, Preston & Steel and Dwight Sullivan, Miami, for petitioner.
Green & Blastings and Irma Robbins Feder, Miami, for Margaret Scott Butler.
Fred C. Davant, of Wicker, Smith, Blomqvist, Hinckley & Davant, Miami, for J. P. Canington.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have heard oral argument on the petition for certiorari to review a decision of the Court of Appeal, Third District, 172 So.2d 499, because of apparent jurisdiction in this court.
After oral argument and a careful study of the record and briefs, we conclude this • court is without jurisdiction in the matter because of lack.of a direct conflict as re- • quired by the Constitution, Article V, Section 4, F.S.A.
The writ is discharged.
THORNAL, C. J., THOMAS, ROBERTS, and O'DONNELL, JJ., and 'TROWBRIDGE, Circuit Judge, concur.