Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edgar MENDOZA-ZAPATA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-11-25
Citations: 545 F. App'x 703
Docket Number: No. 12-10081
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edgar MENDOZA-ZAPATA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: CANBY, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 545
Pages: 703–703

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edgar MENDOZA-ZAPATA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-10081.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 19, 2013.
Filed Nov. 25, 2013.
Christina Marie Cabanillas, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Vincent Lawrence Lacsamana, Esquire, Vincent L. Lacsamana PC, Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: CANBY, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Edgar Mendoza-Zapata appeals from the district court's judgment and challenges the 18-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Because Mendoza-Zapata has fully served his custodial sentence and is not subject to a term of supervised released, we dismiss this appeal as moot. See United States v. Palomba, 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir.1999).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.