Case Name: Franklin and Frances YOUNG, Petitioners, v. CLACKAMAS COUNTY, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1993-05-12
Citations: 120 Or. App. 248
Docket Number: LUBA No. 92-168; CA A78933
Parties: Franklin and Frances YOUNG, Petitioners, v. CLACKAMAS COUNTY, Respondent.
Judges: Before Rossman, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Leeson, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 120
Pages: 248–248

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted April 9,
affirmed May 12,
reconsideration denied July 7,
petition for review denied August 24, 1993 (317 Or 486)
Franklin and Frances YOUNG, Petitioners, v. CLACKAMAS COUNTY, Respondent.
(LUBA No. 92-168; CA A78933)
851 P2d 637
Dorothy S. Cofield, Tigard, argued the cause for petitioners. With her on the brief was David B. Smith, Tigard.
Michael E. Judd, Chief Assistant County Counsel, Oregon City, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.
Before Rossman, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Leeson, Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Affirmed. Dority v. Clackamas County, 115 Or App 449, 838 P2d 1103 (1992), rev den 315 Or 311 (1993); Joyce v. Multnomah County, 114 Or App 244, 835 P2d 127 (1992); Dodd v. Hood River County, 115 Or App 139, 836 P2d 1373, rev allowed 315 Or 271 (1992).