Case Name: United States v. Pickering
Court: United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1816-04
Citations: 2 Cranch 117
Docket Number: 
Parties: United States v. Pickering.
Judges: (Thruston, J., absent,)
Reporter: Reports of cases argued and determined in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia (District of Columbia - reported by Mackey)
Volume: 2
Pages: 117–117

Head Matter:
United States v. Pickering.
An indictment will not lie against a person for dealing with a slave without his master’s consent, the statute having provided a different mode of prosecution.
This was an indictment for dealing with a slave without the consent of his master, contrary to the Act of Virginia of 17th December, 1792, § 16, p. 188.
Mr. E. J. Lee, for the United States.
Mr. Taylor, for the defendant.

Opinion:
The Court
(Thruston, J., absent,)
decided, upon the authority of the United States v. Jesse Simms, 1 Cranch, 252, that an indictment will not lie; the statute having directed the prosecution to be by action on the case by the master for fourfold the value of the article bought or sold, and a penalty of $20 to be recovered by any person who will sue for the same, &c.