Case Name: 10950 RETAIL, LLC, d.b.a. Love Shack, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF JOHNS CREEK, GEORGIA, Sam Bishop, both individually and in his official capacity as Senior Planner of the City of Johns Creek Community Development, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-06-06
Citations: 428 F. App'x 964
Docket Number: No. 10-12547
Parties: 10950 RETAIL, LLC, d.b.a. Love Shack, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF JOHNS CREEK, GEORGIA, Sam Bishop, both individually and in his official capacity as Senior Planner of the City of Johns Creek Community Development, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before HULL and BLACK, Circuit Judges, and Huck, District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 428
Pages: 964–965

Head Matter:
10950 RETAIL, LLC, d.b.a. Love Shack, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF JOHNS CREEK, GEORGIA, Sam Bishop, both individually and in his official capacity as Senior Planner of the City of Johns Creek Community Development, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 10-12547.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
June 6, 2011.
Cary Stephen Wiggins, Cook Youngelson & Wiggins, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Dana K. Maine, Corinne Whitfield Caughman, Brian Richard Dempsey, Freeman, Mathis & Gary, LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before HULL and BLACK, Circuit Judges, and Huck, District Judge.
Honorable Paul C. Huck, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Florida, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
After oral argument and review of the briefs and record, we conclude that Plaintiff-Appellant 10950 Retail, LLC d/b/a Love Shack ("Love Shack") has demonstrated no reversible error in the district court's rulings. Specifically, we find no error in either (1) the district court's dismissal of Love Shack's Complaint pursuant to its order of April 28, 2010, or in (2) the district court's order of August 20, 2010, denying Love Shack's motion for leave to amend and file a first amended complaint and also denying in part and granting in part Love Shack's motion for reconsideration and clarification. We affirm both orders.
AFFIRMED.