Case Name: In the Interest of E.N.C. and D.C. Juvenile Office of the 24th Judicial Circuit, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Carla COX, Respondent/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-04-26
Citations: 161 S.W.3d 900
Docket Number: No. ED 85072
Parties: In the Interest of E.N.C. and D.C. Juvenile Office of the 24th Judicial Circuit, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Carla COX, Respondent/Appellant.
Judges: Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 161
Pages: 900–900

Head Matter:
In the Interest of E.N.C. and D.C. Juvenile Office of the 24th Judicial Circuit, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Carla COX, Respondent/Appellant.
No. ED 85072.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
April 26, 2005.
Jill Colson Mackay, Farmington, Park Hills, for Appellant.
Jack L. Duncan, Park Hills, for Guardian Ad Litem.
Brent D. Newman, Farmington, MO, for Respondent.
Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Mother appeals from the judgment terminating her parental rights to her daughter, E.N.C., and her son D.J.C., under Section 211.447, RSMo 2000. Mother contends the circuit court erred in terminating her parental rights pursuant to Section 211.447.4, RSMo 2000, because the findings for termination were not supported by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence, and in finding termination was in the best interest of the children.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find Mother's claims of error to be without merit. The judgment of termination is supported by substantial clear, cogent, and convincing evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. In re C.N.W., 26 S.W.3d 386, 393 (Mo.App. E.D.2000). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).