Case Name: Donald CRAWFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jack PARSON; Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-02-24
Citations: 88 F. App'x 234
Docket Number: No. 03-15571; D.C. No. CV-02-01488-WBS(DAD)
Parties: Donald CRAWFORD, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Jack PARSON; Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before FERNANDEZ, W. FLETCHER, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 88
Pages: 234–235

Head Matter:
Donald CRAWFORD, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Jack PARSON; Defendants—Appellees.
No. 03-15571.
D.C. No. CV-02-01488-WBS(DAD).
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 17, 2004.
Decided Feb. 24, 2004.
Donald Crawford, pro se, Sacramento, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
No appearance for Defendants-Appellees.
Before FERNANDEZ, W. FLETCHER, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Donald Crawford appeal pro se from the district court's dismissal of his amended complaint against Pacific Corrugated Pipe Company for failure to state a claim. As noted by the district court, Crawford's amended complaint consists of a single typed page, refers to the "California Civil Labor Rights Enforcement Code" and an "Employment Decision of Truth." It states that "three employed attached harshly against the note writer donald crawfod and police came and i was saved from these and the image of the company to train harsh attack."
We have reviewed the record and affirm for the reasons set forth by the magistrate judge in findings and recommendations filed on February 7, 2003.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.