Case Name: Trinity Petroleum Systems, Inc., Respondent, v. L.A. Wenger Contracting Co., Inc., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1999-06-14
Citations: 262 A.D.2d 478
Docket Number: 
Parties: Trinity Petroleum Systems, Inc., Respondent, v L.A. Wenger Contracting Co., Inc., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 262
Pages: 478–478

Head Matter:
Trinity Petroleum Systems, Inc., Respondent, v L.A. Wenger Contracting Co., Inc., Appellant.
[691 NYS2d 321]

Opinion:
—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (R. Goldberg, J.), dated September 15, 1998, which granted the plaintiffs motion to reargue its previous cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the defendant's counterclaim and, upon reargument, granted the cross motion and dismissed the counterclaim.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The defendant's contentions on appeal that the counterclaim alleged a valid indemnification claim and that General Obligations Law § 15-108 does not bar claims for indemnification, were not raised before the Supreme Court and, therefore, are unpreserved for appellate review (see, Jenkins v Meredith Ave. Assocs., 238 AD2d 477; Dannhauser v County of Suffolk, 216 AD2d 514). Krausman, J. P., McGinity, Feuerstein and Smith, JJ., concur.