Case Name: In the Interest of B.K.H. and B.L.A.H., Minors
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2014-09-02
Citations: 439 S.W.3d 850
Docket Number: No. ED 101223
Parties: In the Interest of B.K.H. and B.L.A.H., Minors.
Judges: Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 439
Pages: 850–851

Head Matter:
In the Interest of B.K.H. and B.L.A.H., Minors.
No. ED 101223.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Sept. 2, 2014.
Steven W. Neimeyer, Chesterfield, MO, for appellant.
Lance C. Bretsnyder, Clayton, MO, for respondent.
Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, B.H. (Father), appeals from judgments terminating his parental rights to his minor children, B.K.H. and B.L.A.H., pursuant to Section 211.447 RSMo (Cum.Supp.2007). We have consolidated these appeals. In his two points on appeal, Father challenges the existence of clear, cogent, and convincing evidence supporting the trial court's termination of his parental rights on two statutory grounds: Section 211.447.5(2) (neglect) and Section 211.447.5(3) (failure to rectify). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a •written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).