Case Name: Arthur C. MILLER and A.C. Miller Concrete Products of Florida, Inc., a Florida corporation, Petitioners, v. Harry R. REINHART, Joann Reinhart, Ross R. Reinhart, Richard R. Reinhart, Scott R. Reinhart, and Todd R. Reinhart, Respondents
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1986-11-26
Citations: 497 So. 2d 1332
Docket Number: No. 4-86-1575
Parties: Arthur C. MILLER and A.C. Miller Concrete Products of Florida, Inc., a Florida corporation, Petitioners, v. Harry R. REINHART, Joann Reinhart, Ross R. Reinhart, Richard R. Reinhart, Scott R. Reinhart, and Todd R. Reinhart, Respondents.
Judges: HERSEY, C.J., and ANSTEAD and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 497
Pages: 1332–1332

Head Matter:
Arthur C. MILLER and A.C. Miller Concrete Products of Florida, Inc., a Florida corporation, Petitioners, v. Harry R. REINHART, Joann Reinhart, Ross R. Reinhart, Richard R. Reinhart, Scott R. Reinhart, and Todd R. Reinhart, Respondents.
No. 4-86-1575.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Nov. 26, 1986.
Jay M. Levy of Hershoff and Levy, P.A., Miami, for petitioners.
Amy R. Reeck and Michael J. McNerney of Brinkley, McNerney & Morgan, Fort Lauderdale, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We grant the petition for writ of certio-rari and quash the trial court's order disqualifying counsel for petitioners on the authority of Ray v. Stuckey, 491 So.2d 1211 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) and Cazares v. Church of Scientology of California, Inc., 429 So.2d 348 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). We grant the petition because we find no evi-dentiary support for respondents' claim that counsel was an indispensable witness who would have to be called by petitioners or that counsel would offer testimony adverse to petitioners' case.
HERSEY, C.J., and ANSTEAD and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.