Case Name: In the Matter of Adeline Loehline, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person, STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. ADELINE LOEHLINE, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1991-02-13
Citations: 105 Or. App. 623
Docket Number: 900596049; CA A65478
Parties: In the Matter of Adeline Loehline, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person, STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. ADELINE LOEHLINE, Appellant.
Judges: Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Rossman and De Muniz, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 105
Pages: 623–624

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted January 11,
reversed February 13, 1991
In the Matter of Adeline Loehline, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person, STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. ADELINE LOEHLINE, Appellant.
(900596049; CA A65478)
804 P2d 1226
Paul L. Breed, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.
Richard D. Wasserman, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.
Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Rossman and De Muniz, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
In this civil commitment proceeding, the allegedly mentally ill person assigns as error the trial court's finding that she knowingly and intelligently refused her right to court appointed counsel. ORS 426.100(3) (d). The trial court never advised her on the record of her right to counsel or made a sufficient inquiry to determine whether she was knowingly and intelligently refusing counsel. We accept the state's concession that that was error.
Reversed.