Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Timothy Larnell BASEMORE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-05-21
Citations: 10 F. App'x 134
Docket Number: No. 01-6392
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Timothy Larnell BASEMORE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 10
Pages: 134–135

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Timothy Larnell BASEMORE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 01-6392.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 27, 2001.
Decided May 21, 2001.
Timothy Larnell Basemore, pro se. Cynthia Elaine Tompkins, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, NC, for appellee.
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Timothy Larnell Basemore seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Basemore, Nos. CR-97-5-FO; CA-01-17-4-F (E.D.N.C. Feb. 14, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
We recently held in United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139 (4th Cir.2001) that the new rule announced in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), is not retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review. Accordingly, Appellant's Apprendi claim is not cognizable.