Case Name: James F. Egan, Public Administrator, as Administrator, etc., of Ivar Kreuger, Deceased, Respondent, Appellant, v. Jordahl & Co., Inc., Anders Jordahl, Mary D. Jordahl, David A. Buckley, Jr., and Robert H. Walsh, Appellants, Respondents, Impleaded with Mae T. Deutsch, as Executrix, etc., of Armand S. Deutsch, Deceased, Defendant; James F. Egan, Public Administrator, as Administrator, etc., of Ivar Kreuger, Deceased, Respondent, Appellant, v. Anders Jordahl, Appellant, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1937-06-22
Citations: 251 A.D. 448
Docket Number: 
Parties: James F. Egan, Public Administrator, as Administrator, etc., of Ivar Kreuger, Deceased, Respondent, Appellant, v. Jordahl & Co., Inc., Anders Jordahl, Mary D. Jordahl, David A. Buckley, Jr., and Robert H. Walsh, Appellants, Respondents, Impleaded with Mae T. Deutsch, as Executrix, etc., of Armand S. Deutsch, Deceased, Defendant. James F. Egan, Public Administrator, as Administrator, etc., of Ivar Kreuger, Deceased, Respondent, Appellant, v. Anders Jordahl, Appellant, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 251
Pages: 448–450

Head Matter:
James F. Egan, Public Administrator, as Administrator, etc., of Ivar Kreuger, Deceased, Respondent, Appellant, v. Jordahl & Co., Inc., Anders Jordahl, Mary D. Jordahl, David A. Buckley, Jr., and Robert H. Walsh, Appellants, Respondents, Impleaded with Mae T. Deutsch, as Executrix, etc., of Armand S. Deutsch, Deceased, Defendant. James F. Egan, Public Administrator, as Administrator, etc., of Ivar Kreuger, Deceased, Respondent, Appellant, v. Anders Jordahl, Appellant, Respondent.
First Department,
June 22, 1937.
Benjamin A. Matthews of counsel [Harold Harper and Vincent P. Uihlein with him on the brief; Harper & Matthews, attorneys], for the plaintiff.
Russell C. Gay of counsel [Edward J. Behrens with him on the brief; Boring M Black, attorney], for the defendants Jordahl & Co., Inc., Mary D. Jordahl and Anders Jordahl.
Kermit F. Kip of counsel for the defendants David A. Buckley, Jr., and Robert H. Walsh,

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Both orders should be modified by striking therefrom that portion which reads " at the rate of $100 per day for every day defendant's counsel is away on the business of the deposition, except the days on which the examination is actually conducted," and there should be inserted in place thereof, " in the sum of $1,500," and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs.
Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
Orders unanimously modified by striking therefrom that portion which reads, " at the rate of $100 per day for every day defendant's counsel is away on the business of the deposition, except the days on which the examination is actually conducted," and there should be inserted in place thereof. " in the sum of $1,500," and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs.
Settle orders on notice.