Case Name: In the Matter of Lori Ann HITTLE, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Indiana
Jurisdiction: Indiana
Decision Date: 2013-09-12
Citations: 994 N.E.2d 251
Docket Number: No. 29S00-1304-DI-273
Parties: In the Matter of Lori Ann HITTLE, Respondent.
Judges: All Justices concur.
Reporter: North Eastern Reporter 2d
Volume: 994
Pages: 251–251

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Lori Ann HITTLE, Respondent.
No. 29S00-1304-DI-273.
Supreme Court of Indiana.
Sept. 12, 2013.

Opinion:
PUBLISHED ORDER APPROVING STATEMENT OF CIRCUMSTANCES AND CONDITIONAL AGREEMENT FOR DISCIPLINE
Pursuant to Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 23(11), the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission and Respondent have submitted for approval a "Statement of Circumstances and Conditional Agreement for Discipline" stipulating agreed facts and proposed discipline as summarized below:
Stipulated Facts: Based on an incident in April 2012, while serving as a part-time deputy prosecutor in Howard County, Respondent pled guilty to operating a vehicle while intoxicated, as class A misdemeanor.
The parties cite the following facts in mitigation: (1) Respondent has no disciplinary history; (2) Respondent was cooperative with the Commission; (3) Respondent is remorseful; (4) Respondent was suspended for one month without pay from her position as deputy prosecutor; and (5) prior to the filing of criminal charges, Respondent began and is continuing individual substance abuse counseling.
Violation: The parties agree that Respondent violated Indiana Professional Conduct Rule 8.4(d), which prohibits engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice.
Discipline: The parties propose the appropriate discipline is a public reprimand. The Court, having considered the submissions of the parties, now approves the agreed discipline and imposes a public reprimand for Respondent's misconduct.
The costs of this proceeding are assessed against Respondent. With the acceptance of this agreement, the hearing officer appointed in this case is discharged.
The Clerk is directed to forward a copy of this Order to the hearing officer, to the parties or their respective attorneys, and to all other entities entitled to notice under Admission and Discipline Rule 23(3)(d). The Clerk is further directed to post this order to the Court's website, and Thomson Reuters is directed to publish a copy of this order in the bound volumes of this Court's decisions.
All Justices concur.