Case Name: David L. HEILMAN, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-06-03
Citations: 600 So. 2d 1200
Docket Number: No. 92-1219
Parties: David L. HEILMAN, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, Appellee.
Judges: GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and LETTS and DELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 600
Pages: 1200–1201

Head Matter:
David L. HEILMAN, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, Appellee.
No. 92-1219.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
June 3, 1992.
Rehearing Denied July 30, 1992.
Stephen L. Cook, Jupiter, for appellant.
Joseph R. Boyd and William H. Branch of Boyd & Branch, P.A., and Chriss Walker of Dept, of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Tallahassee, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The initial pleading filed in this case, which seeks review of an order of contempt and commitment entered by the trial court because of delinquency in child support payments, was submitted as a petition for writ of certiorari. This court previously determined that the proper avenue for seeking relief was by appeal; that the petition would suffice as the initial brief, and that the appendix was also sufficient.
In compliance with this court's order of April 22, 1992, appellee filed a response to an emergency motion for stay of execution that was imbedded in the initial pleading. Because that response discusses the merits of the appeal in addition to the motion for stay, the response will serve adequately as an answer brief.
Finding the appeal to be without merit, the court withdraws further instructions on briefing found in its order of April 22, 1992, and summarily affirms.
AFFIRMED.
GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and LETTS and DELL, JJ., concur.