Case Name: Edgar PERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Stephanie WALKER, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-07-24
Citations: 286 F. App'x 436
Docket Number: No. 08-15688
Parties: Edgar PERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Stephanie WALKER, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 286
Pages: 436–437

Head Matter:
Edgar PERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Stephanie WALKER, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 08-15688.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 14, 2008.
Filed July 24, 2008.
Edgar Perry, pro se.
Stephanie Walker, pro se.
Before: SCHROEDER, LEAVY and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
A review of the record, appellant's opening brief, and the parties' responses to the order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.
All pending motions are denied.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.