Case Name: Columbia Insurance Company, complainant-respondent, v. Emanuel Artale, Mamie Artale and Joseph T. Lieblich, defendants-appellants
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1933-09-27
Citations: 114 N.J. Eq. 268
Docket Number: 
Parties: Columbia Insurance Company, complainant-respondent, v. Emanuel Artale, Mamie Artale and Joseph T. Lieblich, defendants-appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 114
Pages: 268–268

Head Matter:
Columbia Insurance Company, complainant-respondent, v. Emanuel Artale, Mamie Artale and Joseph T. Lieblich, defendants-appellants.
[Argued May 25th, 1933.
Decided September 27th, 1933.]
Mr. Joseph T. Lieblich, for the appellants.
Mr. Arthur T. Vanderbilt, for the respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree will he affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion below.
We express no opinion upon the propriety of the award to appellant' Lieblich, of a lien on the proceeds of the sale of the mortgaged premises, for attorney's services rendered to his co-appellants, Emanuel Artale and Mamie Artale. The latter have not raised the. question, and it is therefore not before us.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Yan Bus-kirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.
For reversal — -Hone.