Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. ALPHONSO LESTER, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1985-08-28
Citations: 75 Or. App. 130
Docket Number: 82-0330; CA A34129
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. ALPHONSO LESTER, Appellant.
Judges: Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Newman, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 75
Pages: 130–131

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted July 24,
conviction affirmed, judgment modified August 28, 1985
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. ALPHONSO LESTER, Appellant.
(82-0330; CA A34129)
704 P2d 1169
Sally L. Avera, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.
Christine L. Dickey, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and James E. Mountain, Jr., Solicitor General, Salem.
Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Newman, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant appeals his conviction for robbery in the first degree. He contends that the court erred in admitting evidence respecting his participation in two other robberies and in imposing a mandatory minimum sentence in accordance with ORS 161.610. We conclude that the court did not err in admitting the evidence and affirm the conviction.
The state concedes that the court erred in imposing a mandatory minimum term of imprisonment, because there was no jury finding or admission by the defendant that he personally had used a gun in commission of the crime. See State v. Wedge, 293 Or 598, 652 P2d 773 (1982).
Conviction affirmed; judgment modified to delete five-year minimum imposed pursuant to ORS 161.610.