Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dennis Elijah JEMISON, a/k/a D.J., a/k/a Larry R. Mathis, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-02-04
Citations: 55 F. App'x 204
Docket Number: No. 02-7224
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dennis Elijah JEMISON, a/k/a D.J., a/k/a Larry R. Mathis, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 55
Pages: 204–205

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dennis Elijah JEMISON, a/k/a D.J., a/k/a Larry R. Mathis, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-7224.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 30, 2002.
Decided Feb. 4, 2003.
Dennis Elijah Jemison, Appellant Pro Se. Janet S. Reincke, Office of the United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Ap-pellee.
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Dennis Elijah Jemison seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motions for reconsideration of the denial of his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude on the reasoning of the district court that Jemison has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See United, States v. Jemi-son, Nos. CR-97-117; CA-01-395-2 (E.D. Va. filed July 19, 2002 & entered July 22, 2002; Aug. 9, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.