Case Name: Michelle Johnson BAH; Mountaga Bah, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. WELLS FARGO BANK NA, Defendant-Appellee, and HSBC Bank USA; Department of the Treasury; Real Time Resolutions, Incorporated; Wells Fargo Bank West N.A.; HUD, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-06-10
Citations: 576 F. App'x 132
Docket Number: No. 09-2217
Parties: Michelle Johnson BAH; Mountaga Bah, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. WELLS FARGO BANK NA, Defendant-Appellee, and HSBC Bank USA; Department of the Treasury; Real Time Resolutions, Incorporated; Wells Fargo Bank West N.A.; HUD, Defendants.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 576
Pages: 132–132

Head Matter:
Michelle Johnson BAH; Mountaga Bah, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. WELLS FARGO BANK NA, Defendant-Appellee, and HSBC Bank USA; Department of the Treasury; Real Time Resolutions, Incorporated; Wells Fargo Bank West N.A.; HUD, Defendants.
No. 09-2217.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 9, 2014.
Decided: June 10, 2014.
Mary E. Goulet, Whitham, Curtis, Christofferson & Cook, P.C., Reston, Virginia, for Appellants. Amy S. Owen, Elizabeth S. Finberg, Cochran & Owen, L.L.C., Vienna, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michelle Johnson Bah and Mountaga Bah appeal from the district court's order dismissing their civil action, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), in which they sought to prevent foreclosure proceedings against their home. We have reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bah v. Wells Fargo Bank NA, No. 8:08-cv-03429-RWT, 2009 WL 9119980 (D.Md. Sept. 23, 2009). We deny the Appellee's motion to strike and for sanctions, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.