Case Name: Sigitas BANAITIS, Respondent on Review, v. MITSUBISHI BANK, LTD., and Bank of California, N.A., Petitioners on Review, and Karen LESH, Defendant
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1995-08-24
Citations: 321 Or. 511
Docket Number: CC A8912-07357; CA A70113; SC S41684
Parties: Sigitas BANAITIS, Respondent on Review, v. MITSUBISHI BANK, LTD., and Bank of California, N.A., Petitioners on Review, and Karen LESH, Defendant.
Judges: Van Hoomissen and Durham, JJ., would not dismiss.
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 321
Pages: 511–511

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted May 3,
review dismissed as improvidently allowed August 24, 1995
Sigitas BANAITIS, Respondent on Review, v. MITSUBISHI BANK, LTD., and Bank of California, N.A., Petitioners on Review, and Karen LESH, Defendant.
(CC [ AXXXX-XXXXX ]; CA A70113; SC S41684)
900 P2d 508
James N. Westwood, of Miller, Nash, Wiener, Hager & Carlsen, Portland, argued the cause for petitioners on review. With him on the briefs were Michael O. Moran, Black Helterline, Portland, and Jacob Tanzer, Portland, of counsel.
Charles J. Merten, of Merten & Associates, Portland, argued the cause for respondent on review. With him on the briefs were John Paul Graff, of Graff & O’Neil, Portland, and Glen H. Downs, Portland.
Richard C. Busse and Scott N. Hunt, Portland, filed a brief for amicus curiae Oregon Trial Lawyers Association.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Review dismissed as improvidently allowed.
Van Hoomissen and Durham, JJ., would not dismiss.