Case Name: Paul W. GRANVILLE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Marvin HOGAN, Warden, U. S. Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1979-03-16
Citations: 591 F.2d 323
Docket Number: No. 78-1487
Parties: Paul W. GRANVILLE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Marvin HOGAN, Warden, U. S. Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 591
Pages: 323–324

Head Matter:
Paul W. GRANVILLE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Marvin HOGAN, Warden, U. S. Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 78-1487
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 16, 1979.
Paul W. Granville, pro se.
William L. Harper, U. S. Atty., William E. Turnipseed, Asst. U. S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for respondent-appellee.
Before COLEMAN, FAY and RUBIN, Circuit Judges.
Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appellant, a federal prisoner who violated his parole, challenges the revoking of his good time credits by appellee in this habeas action. As this Court recently noted in Lambert v. Warden et al., 591 F.2d 4, 8 (5th Cir. 1979) we see nothing in the legislative history of the Parole Commission and Reorganization Act, Pub. L. No. 94-233, 90 Stat. 219 (codified at 18 U.S.C. § 4201 et seq.) which indicates that Congress intended to alter the well-established rule that parole violators forfeit their good time credits and time spent on conditional release. Lambert, supra, at 8.
Petitioner also contends that the utilization of a magistrate delayed the judicial process, that his petition was not acted upon expeditiously, that he was entitled to a hearing, and that he was entitled to a court appointed attorney. As these arguments are without merit, we affirm the district court's denial of habeas relief.
AFFIRMED.