Case Name: Bobby Maurice NICHOLSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director; John Garman, Western Regional Director; Randy C. Mathena; Kiser, Asst. Warden; Eddie L. Peterson, Warden/Old Warden; P. Kelly, Old Warden; J. Boone, Asst. Warden; Lt. Highth, Intel/Investigator Supervisor; Jarry Oate, III, Unit Manager; R.L. Tuell, Unit Manager; Nothing, Correctional Officer; F. Adam, Sgt.; Ms. Baker, Asst. Dentist, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-04-01
Citations: 564 F. App'x 44
Docket Number: No. 13-7996
Parties: Bobby Maurice NICHOLSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director; John Garman, Western Regional Director; Randy C. Mathena; Kiser, Asst. Warden; Eddie L. Peterson, Warden/Old Warden; P. Kelly, Old Warden; J. Boone, Asst. Warden; Lt. Highth, Intel/Investigator Supervisor; Jarry Oate, III, Unit Manager; R.L. Tuell, Unit Manager; Nothing, Correctional Officer; F. Adam, Sgt.; Ms. Baker, Asst. Dentist, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 564
Pages: 44–45

Head Matter:
Bobby Maurice NICHOLSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director; John Garman, Western Regional Director; Randy C. Mathena; Kiser, Asst. Warden; Eddie L. Peterson, Warden/Old Warden; P. Kelly, Old Warden; J. Boone, Asst. Warden; Lt. Highth, Intel/Investigator Supervisor; Jarry Oate, III, Unit Manager; R.L. Tuell, Unit Manager; Nothing, Correctional Officer; F. Adam, Sgt.; Ms. Baker, Asst. Dentist, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 13-7996.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 27, 2014.
Decided: April 1, 2014.
Bobby Maurice Nicholson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Before MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Bobby Maurice Nicholson, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Nicholson's motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Nicholson v. Clarke, No. 1:13-cv-01397-LO-IDD (E.D.Va. Nov. 20, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.