Case Name: Myron Roderick NUNN, Appellant, and Lawrence P. Gilmartin, Plaintiff, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY; Dr. Land; Medical Department, Greene Correctional Institution, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-01-10
Citations: 675 F. App'x 227
Docket Number: No. 16-7006
Parties: Myron Roderick NUNN, Appellant, and Lawrence P. Gilmartin, Plaintiff, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY; Dr. Land; Medical Department, Greene Correctional Institution, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 675
Pages: 227–228

Head Matter:
Myron Roderick NUNN, Appellant, and Lawrence P. Gilmartin, Plaintiff, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY; Dr. Land; Medical Department, Greene Correctional Institution, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-7006
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: December 20, 2016
Decided: January 10, 2017
Myron Roderick Nunn, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Myron Roderick Nunn seeks to appeal the district court's failure to rule on his motion to amend a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). Nunn's notice of appeal challenges neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny Nunn's motion for the appointment of counsel and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.