Case Name: Charles Burden, Respondent, v. Leonidas Hornsby, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Missouri
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1872-07
Citations: 50 Mo. 238
Docket Number: 
Parties: Charles Burden, Respondent, v. Leonidas Hornsby, Appellant.
Judges: The other judges concur.
Reporter: Missouri Reports
Volume: 50
Pages: 238–239

Head Matter:
Charles Burden, Respondent, v. Leonidas Hornsby, Appellant.
1. Justice of peace •— Jurisdiction — Amendment. — A justice of the peace may permit a plaintiff to amend his statement so as to bring the amount within his jurisdiction.
2. Practice, civil — New trial — Error. — Error will not lie for granting a new trial.
Appeal from Johnson Court of Common Pleas.
Crittenden & Cockrell, for appellant.
Phillips & Vest and Elliott & Blodgett, for respondent.

Opinion:
Bliss, Judge,
delivered the opinion of the court.
Suit was brought originally before a justice of the peace for killing plaintiff's dog, and the damages were laid at $100. On motion to dismiss for excess of claim, the plaintiff amended his statement so as to make his claim but $50, and went to trial. This leave to amend is the first error complained of, but it was perfectly proper to make the correction. The defendant appealed, and upon trial the verdict was in his favor. The court, however, on the plaintiff's motion, granted a new trial, and this is also claimed to be erroneous. It has long since been settled in Mis souri that error will not lie for granting a new trial. The reasons are set forth in Helm v. Bassett, 9 Mo. 52, and the doctrine is affirmed in Keating v. Bradford, 25 Mo. 86. Upon the second trial the evidence was all submitted to the jury upon fair instructions, and the case should have stopped there. I find no error whatever in the record.
Judgment affirmed.
The other judges concur.