Case Name: In re Rosemary FOSTER, Respondent
Court: District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Decision Date: 2013-12-19
Citations: 81 A.3d 324
Docket Number: No. 13-BG-981
Parties: In re Rosemary FOSTER, Respondent.
Judges: Before McLEESE, Associate Judge, and TERRY and FARRELL, Senior Judges.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 81
Pages: 324–325

Head Matter:
In re Rosemary FOSTER, Respondent.
No. 13-BG-981.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Filed Dec. 19, 2013.
Before McLEESE, Associate Judge, and TERRY and FARRELL, Senior Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
On consideration of the certified order of the Supreme Court of the State of Oregon that suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of thirty days with reinstatement conditioned on respondent taking the Multistate Professional Responsibility Exam (MPRE) and earning a scaled score of 85 or greater; this court's September 18, 2013, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing her to show cause why reciprocal discipline should not be imposed; the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline; and it appearing that respondent failed to respond to this court's order, but did file a D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit on October 5, 2013, it is
ORDERED that respondent Rosemary Foster is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a period of thirty days, nunc pro tunc to October 5, 2013, with reinstatement contingent on her taking the MPRE and earning a scaled score of 85 or greater. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C.2010), and In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007) (re-buttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate).