Case Name: Ray F. WARREN and Katherine B. Warren, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. MERCANTILE BANK OF ST. LOUIS, N.A., Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-06-19
Citations: 53 S.W.3d 177
Docket Number: No. ED 78166
Parties: Ray F. WARREN and Katherine B. Warren, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. MERCANTILE BANK OF ST. LOUIS, N.A., Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., P.J., MARY RHODES RUSSELL, and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 53
Pages: 177–178

Head Matter:
Ray F. WARREN and Katherine B. Warren, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. MERCANTILE BANK OF ST. LOUIS, N.A., Defendant/Respondent.
No. ED 78166.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
June 19, 2001.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 26, 2001.
Application for Transfer Denied Sept. 25, 2001.
John E. Toma, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Gary Mayes, James W. Erwin, Daniel C. Cox, St. Louis, MO, for respondents.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., P.J., MARY RHODES RUSSELL, and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Ray F. Warren and Katherine B. Warren ("Plaintiffs") appeal from a summary judgment granted in favor of Mercantile Bank of St. Louis, N.A. ("Defendant"), on Plaintiffs' action for slander.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).