Case Name: Roush v. Russell et al.
Court: Appellate Court of Indiana
Jurisdiction: Indiana
Decision Date: 1902-03-20
Citations: 28 Ind. App. 699
Docket Number: No. 3,530
Parties: Roush v. Russell et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Indiana Court of Appeals Reports
Volume: 28
Pages: 699–699

Head Matter:
Roush v. Russell et al.
[No. 3,530.
Filed March 20, 1902.]
From Boone Circuit Court; B. S. Higgins, Judge.
Action by Charles D. Russell and others against Milton Roush for possession of real estate. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals.
Affirmed.
C. Q. QuenCher and A. B. Clark, for appellant.
J. W. Strawn, O. E. Brumbaugh and J. Combs, for appellees.

Opinion:
Black, J.
The appellees brought their action to recover possession of land from the appellant, their tenant holding over. The only question presented here relates to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict for the appellees. Evidence introduced on behalf of the appellees fully supported the verdict, and the appellant can derive no benefit on appeal from his evidence of a contrary tendency. The conflict of evidence determined in the trial court can not be opened up and again decided here.
Judgment affirmed.