Case Name: Melvin B. WELLS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Joseph Orange, SSG. Military Police; Michale J. Serra, Investigator (MP); Michael J. Hufler; Sophie Gonzalez, Sgt. Military Police; C. Carter, Lieutenant, and Provose Marshal, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-03-04
Citations: 122 F. App'x 642
Docket Number: No. 04-2363
Parties: Melvin B. WELLS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Joseph Orange, SSG. Military Police; Michale J. Serra, Investigator (MP); Michael J. Hufler; Sophie Gonzalez, Sgt. Military Police; C. Carter, Lieutenant, and Provose Marshal, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 122
Pages: 642–642

Head Matter:
Melvin B. WELLS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Joseph Orange, SSG. Military Police; Michale J. Serra, Investigator (MP); Michael J. Hufler; Sophie Gonzalez, Sgt. Military Police; C. Carter, Lieutenant, and Provose Marshal, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 04-2363.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 24, 2005.
Decided: March 4, 2005.
Melvin B. Wells, Jr., Appellant pro se.
Virginia Lynn Van Valkenburg, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Melvin B. Wells, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying his civil action seeking damages as a result of his arrest by military police at Fort Eustis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Wells v. United States, No. CA-04-292-2 (E.D.Va. Oct. 18, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED