Case Name: David GAVLAK and Hillside Spring Farm, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TOWN OF SOMERS and Somers Zoning Board of Appeals, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-05-23
Citations: 184 F. App'x 32
Docket Number: No. 05-4748-cv
Parties: David GAVLAK and Hillside Spring Farm, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TOWN OF SOMERS and Somers Zoning Board of Appeals, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Present: ROGER J. MINER and RICHARD C. WESLEY, Circuit Judges, and LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 184
Pages: 32–33

Head Matter:
David GAVLAK and Hillside Spring Farm, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TOWN OF SOMERS and Somers Zoning Board of Appeals, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 05-4748-cv.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
May 23, 2006.
John R. Williams, New Haven, CT, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
James N. Tallbert West Hartford, CT, for Defendants-Appellees.
Present: ROGER J. MINER and RICHARD C. WESLEY, Circuit Judges, and LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, District Judge.
. The Honorable Laura Taylor Swain of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York sitting by designation.

Opinion:
SUMMARY ORDER
Plaintiffs David Gavlak and Hillside Springs Farm, Inc., appeal from an August 2, 2005 judgment of the District Court dismissing all claims against defendants Town of Somers and Somers Zoning Board of Appeals on the basis of defendants' motion for summary judgment. We assume the parties' familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history. Substantially for the reasons stated in the opinion of the District Court, we conclude that summary judgment for defendants was appropriate for all the claims in the complaint. We have carefully considered all of plaintiffs' arguments and find them without merit. The judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED and the pending motion to supplement the record is hereby DENIED as moot.