Case Name: Bethany L. DUBROC; Roger Dubroc, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. WAL-MART LOUISIANA, L.L.C., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-05-26
Citations: 689 F. App'x 825
Docket Number: No. 16-31249
Parties: Bethany L. DUBROC; Roger Dubroc, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. WAL-MART LOUISIANA, L.L.C., Defendant-Appellee
Judges: Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 689
Pages: 825–825

Head Matter:
Bethany L. DUBROC; Roger Dubroc, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. WAL-MART LOUISIANA, L.L.C., Defendant-Appellee
No. 16-31249
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
May 26, 2017
Richard Alan Rozanski, Esq., Wheelis & Rozanski, A.P.L.C., Alexandria, LA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants
Robert O’Neal Chadwick, Jr., Counsel, Gregory Brent Odom, II, Chadwick & Odom, L.L.C., Alexandria, LA, for Defendant-Appellee
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The plaintiff suffered a slip-and-fall in a Wal-Mart store during a rainstorm. In her resulting lawsuit, the district court granted summary judgment for Wal-Mart because she could not show any evidence that Wal-Mart either created or had actual or constructive knowledge of the condition that caused her injury, as is required under Louisiana negligence law. We affirm for essentially the reasons stated by the district court in its November 29,2016 Memorandum Ruling.
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.