Case Name: Oscar Strosensky, Appellant, v. Nassau Electric Railroad Company, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1919-11
Citations: 189 A.D. 954
Docket Number: 
Parties: Oscar Strosensky, Appellant, v. Nassau Electric Railroad Company, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 189
Pages: 954–954

Head Matter:
Oscar Strosensky, Appellant, v. Nassau Electric Railroad Company, Respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment reversed.and new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event. The jury having found a verdict for the plaintiff's wife in her action for damages, the verdict for the defendant in the husband's case is against the evidence and inconsistent. He was at least entitled to recover a reasonable amount for the doctor's services. (Gray v. Brooklyn Heights R. R. Co., 72 App. Div. 454.) Rich, Putnam, Blackmar, Kelly and Jaycox, JJ., concurred.