Case Name: In re Applications of Piro
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1993-06-16
Citations: 66 Ohio St. 3d 400
Docket Number: No. 93-443
Parties: In re Applications of Piro.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 66
Pages: 400–402

Head Matter:
In re Applications of Piro.
[Cite as In re Applications of Piro (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 400.]
(No. 93-443
Submitted April 20, 1993
Decided June 16, 1993.)
Glinsek, Higham & Kristoff and JoAnn Harris, for applicant.
Gerald R. Leipply, for the Akron Bar Association.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Having reviewed the record in this proceeding, we agree with the board that Piro has not established by clear and convincing evidence the necessary character and fitness for admission to the practice of law in Ohio. Gov. Bar R. I(11)(C)(6). Accordingly, his applications to register as a candidate for admission to the practice of law and to take the bar examination are disapproved. Piro may reapply to take the February 1994 bar examination and, upon reapplication, shall be subject to full review of his character and fitness.
Applications denied.
Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.