Case Name: W. A. STRONG, GEORGE C. ALBERT (Substituted), Respondent, v. CLARA A. SHATTO et al., Defendants; G. ALLAN HANCOCK et al., Appellants
Court: Supreme Court of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1927-07-02
Citations: 201 Cal. 773
Docket Number: L. A. No. 8556
Parties: W. A. STRONG, GEORGE C. ALBERT (Substituted), Respondent, v. CLARA A. SHATTO et al., Defendants; G. ALLAN HANCOCK et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Reports
Volume: 201
Pages: 773–773

Head Matter:
[L. A. No. 8556.
In Bank.
July 2, 1927.]
W. A. STRONG, GEORGE C. ALBERT (Substituted), Respondent, v. CLARA A. SHATTO et al., Defendants; G. ALLAN HANCOCK et al., Appellants.
Bradner W. Lee, Bradner W. Lee, Jr., Kenyon F. Lee and Loeb, Walker & Loeb for Appellant.
Stephens & Stephens, Schenck & Silverstein, Lovett & Hervey, Frank Carr, S. F. McFarlane, B. Rey Schauer, Anderson & Anderson, Victor E. Shaw & McDaniel, Leroy M. Edwards and John L. Dyer for Respondents.
Maurice E. Harrison, Amicus Curiae.

Opinion:
THE COURT.
The parties to this appeal having stipulated that the same may stand submitted upon the briefs on file in the causes of W. A. Strong, George C. Albert, Substituted, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. G. Allan Hancock et al., Defendants and Respondents, ante, p. 530 [258 Pac. 60], and TV A. Strong, George C. Albert, Substituted, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Clara A. Shatto et dl., Defendants; John G. Bullock et al., Defendants and Appellants, ante, p. 555 [258 Pac. 71], and having further stipulated that no other questions are presented upon this appeal than those presented and decided in the aforesaid causes, it is hereby ordered, upon the authority of the decisions in said causes this day filed, that the judgment, in so far as the appellants herein are affected thereby, is affirmed.