Case Name: McCarthy v. United States; Urichich v. City of Youngstown et al.; Smith v. City and County of Denver et al.; Smith v. Regional Transportation District et al.; Hamilton v. United States; Massengale v. Mills, Warden; Parham v. PepsiCo, Inc.; Haynes v. South Carolina et al.; Sorbet v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board et al.; Fort v. Hailey et al.; Blandino v. Lindler et al.; Johnson v. Hill, Warden; Partee v. Pastrick et al.; Yuan Jin v. Temple University et al.; Pizzo v. Jefferson Parish Sheriff's Office et al.; Slappy v. Vanmeter et al.; Rawlins v. Allen, Clerk, Superior Court of Arizona, Maricopa County, et al.
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1997-01-21
Citations: 519 U.S. 1101
Docket Number: No. 95-9302; No. 96-202; No. 96-528; No. 96-545; No. 96-5242; No. 96-5520; No. 96-5702; No. 96-5826; No. 96-5906; No. 96-5978; No. 96-5985; No. 96-6027; No. 96-6090; No. 96-6129; No. 96-6165; No. 96-6190; No. 96-6290
Parties: McCarthy v. United States, Urichich v. City of Youngstown et al., Smith v. City and County of Denver et al., Smith v. Regional Transportation District et al., Hamilton v. United States, Massengale v. Mills, Warden, Parham v. PepsiCo, Inc., Haynes v. South Carolina et al., Sorbet v. Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board et al., Fort v. Hailey et al., Blandino v. Lindler et al., Johnson v. Hill, Warden, Partee v. Pastrick et al., Yuan Jin v. Temple University et al., Pizzo v. Jefferson Parish Sheriff’s Office et al., Slappy v. Vanmeter et al., Rawlins v. Allen, Clerk, Superior Court of Arizona, Maricopa County, et al.,
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 519
Pages: 1101–1102

Head Matter:
No. 95-9302.
No. 96-202.
No. 96-528.
McCarthy v. United States, Urichich v. City of Youngstown et al., Smith v. City and County of Denver et al., Smith v. Regional Transportation District et al., Hamilton v. United States, Massengale v. Mills, Warden, Parham v. PepsiCo, Inc., Haynes v. South Carolina et al., Sorbet v. Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board et al., Fort v. Hailey et al., Blandino v. Lindler et al., Johnson v. Hill, Warden, Partee v. Pastrick et al., Yuan Jin v. Temple University et al., Pizzo v. Jefferson Parish Sheriff’s Office et al., Slappy v. Vanmeter et al., Rawlins v. Allen, Clerk, Superior Court of Arizona, Maricopa County, et al.,

Opinion:
ante, p. 991;
ante, p. 928;
ante, p. 1010;
No. 96-545.
No. 96-5242.
No. 96-5520.
No. 96-5702.
No. 96-5826.
No. 96-5906.
No. 96-5978.
No. 96-5985.
No. 96-6027.
No. 96-6090.
No. 96-6129.
No. 96-6165.
No. 96-6190.
No. 96-6290.
ante, p. 1021;
ante, p. 994;
ante, p. 934;
ante, p. 953;
ante, p. 939;
ante, p. 983;
ante, p. 996;
ante, p. 996;
ante, p. 996;
ante, p. 1012;
ante, p. 1013;
ante, p. 1014;
ante, p. 1014; and
ante, p. 1016. Petitions for rehearing denied.