Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jerome TATE, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-11-02
Citations: 148 S.W.3d 874
Docket Number: No. ED 83885
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jerome TATE, Appellant.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 148
Pages: 874–874

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jerome TATE, Appellant.
No. ED 83885.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Nov. 2, 2004.
Amanda R. Schehr, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Deborah Daniels, Dora A. Fichter-eo-counsel, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Jerome Tate (Appellant) appeals from the trial court's judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of carrying a concealed weapon, Section 571.030.1, and possession of a controlled substance, Section 195.202. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not err or abuse its discretion. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).
. All statutory references are to RSMo 2000, unless otherwise indicated.