Case Name: James E. Prokop, Sr., appellant, v. Jacks Bean Company, a Colorado corporation, appellee
Court: Nebraska Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Nebraska
Decision Date: 1990-12-14
Citations: 236 Neb. 774
Docket Number: No. 88-775
Parties: James E. Prokop, Sr., appellant, v. Jacks Bean Company, a Colorado corporation, appellee.
Judges: Hastings, C.J., Boslaugh, White, Caporale, Shanahan, Grant, and Fahrnbruch, JJ.
Reporter: Nebraska Reports
Volume: 236
Pages: 774–775

Head Matter:
James E. Prokop, Sr., appellant, v. Jacks Bean Company, a Colorado corporation, appellee.
463 N.W.2d 628
Filed December 14, 1990.
No. 88-775.
Peter C. Wegman, of Rembolt Ludtke Parker & Berger, for appellant.
Paul W. Snyder, of Van Steenberg, Chaloupka, Mullin, Holyoke, Pahlke, Smith, Snyder &Hofmeister, for appellee.
Hastings, C.J., Boslaugh, White, Caporale, Shanahan, Grant, and Fahrnbruch, JJ.

Opinion:
Hastings, C.J.
Plaintiff-appellant, James E. Prokop, Sr., brought this action against Jacks Bean Company to recover damages for breach of an alleged oral contract for the sale of Prokop's beans to Jacks. Prokop has appealed the order of the district court which entered summary judgment in favor of Jacks.
This case involves the same defendant as in Joseph Heiting & Sons v. Jacks Bean Co., ante p. 765, 463 N.W.2d 817 (1990), as well as a similar set of facts and identical questions of law. Accordingly, because Heiting is controlling, the judgment herein is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with our opinion in Heiting.
Reversed and remanded for FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.