Case Name: DISSETTE v. LONG
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1922-04-03
Citations: 280 F. 457
Docket Number: No. 3692
Parties: DISSETTE v. LONG.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter
Volume: 280
Pages: 457–457

Head Matter:
DISSETTE v. LONG.
(Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.
Submitted March 8, 1922.
Decided April 3, 1922.)
No. 3692.
Appeal from the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia.
Action by Albert IÍ. Long against John W. Dissette. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
Affirmed.
Dion S. Rirney, of Washington. D. C., for appellant.
J. Easby-Sinilh and Ralph B. IPleharty, both of Washington, D. C., for ap-pellee.

Opinion:
SMYTH, Chief Justice.
Long sued Dissette for $1,694.28, and filed an affidavit of merit under the seventy-third rule of the trial court. Dissette filed pleas to Long's declaration, and also an affidavit of 'defense, in which he admitted that he owed Long $627.70, and averred a set-off in the sum of $5,000. Long then moved for judgment, because, as averred, the affidavit did not state a good defense to any part of Ms claim. The court gave judgment for $1,025.48, and overruled (ho motion as to the remainder.
On the sufficiency of the affidavit with respect to the set-off the appeal turns. In (hat regard the affidavit is identical with the one-in the case of Dissette v. Dost, - App. D. C. -, 280 Hod. 455, this day decided, and hence this appeal is ruled by the decision in that case.
The judgment is affirmed; the costs to be paid by appellant,
Affirmed.