Case Name: Bernard BISHOP, Dan Worsham and Ronald Forbell, Appellants, v. Melvin KELLY, Sheriff of Hernando County, and William F. Edwards, Hernando County Sheriff's Office, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1981-10-21
Citations: 404 So. 2d 1149
Docket Number: No. 81-138
Parties: Bernard BISHOP, Dan Worsham and Ronald Forbell, Appellants, v. Melvin KELLY, Sheriff of Hernando County, and William F. Edwards, Hernando County Sheriff’s Office, Appellees.
Judges: DAUKSCH, C. J., and COBB and SHARP, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 404
Pages: 1149–1149

Head Matter:
Bernard BISHOP, Dan Worsham and Ronald Forbell, Appellants, v. Melvin KELLY, Sheriff of Hernando County, and William F. Edwards, Hernando County Sheriff’s Office, Appellees.
No. 81-138.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Oct. 21, 1981.
James W. O’Neill, Jr., Law Offices of William F. Casler, Sr., St. Petersburg, for appellants.
Joseph E. Johnston, Jr., and Julius F. Parker, Jr., of Madigan, Parker, Gatlin, Swedmark & Skelding, Tallahassee, for ap-pellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
An order dismissing a complaint with leave to amend is a non-final order. As such, it is not appealable prior to final dismissal. Hancock v. Piper, 186 So.2d 489 (Fla.1966); Petnuch v. Smith, 395 So.2d 294 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). Accordingly, this appeal is sua sponte
DISMISSED.
DAUKSCH, C. J., and COBB and SHARP, JJ., concur.