Case Name: Irina Zak, Appellant, v. Betty Mintz, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2010-01-12
Citations: 69 A.D.3d 454
Docket Number: 
Parties: Irina Zak, Appellant, v Betty Mintz, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 69
Pages: 454–454

Head Matter:
Irina Zak, Appellant, v Betty Mintz, Respondent.
[891 NYS2d 280]

Opinion:
There was no evidence that defendant refused to obey an order for disclosure or wilfully failed to disclose information. Plaintiff declined the court's offer to submit interrogatories or to conduct a continued deposition of defendant. Accordingly, denial of the motion was a proper exercise of the court's discretion (Gross v Edmer Sanitary Supply Co., 201 AD2d 390 [1994]). Concur—Saxe, J.E, Catterson, Moskowitz, DeGrasse and AbdusSalaam, JJ.