Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Shawn A. Bowser, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2001-10-29
Citations: 287 A.D.2d 728
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Shawn A. Bowser, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 287
Pages: 728–729

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Shawn A. Bowser, Appellant.
[732 NYS2d 175]

Opinion:
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Nelson, J.), rendered December 22, 1998, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it is legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Moreover, resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the trier of fact, which saw and heard the witnesses (see, People v Gaimari, 176 NY 84, 94). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record (see, People v Garafolo, 44 AD2d 86, 88). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt is not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). O'Brien, J. P., Goldstein, Schmidt and Smith, JJ., concur.