Case Name: Joseph E. MACON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rodney RICHEY, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-06-15
Citations: 133 F. App'x 910
Docket Number: No. 05-1412
Parties: Joseph E. MACON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rodney RICHEY, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 133
Pages: 910–911

Head Matter:
Joseph E. MACON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rodney RICHEY, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 05-1412.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 9, 2005.
Decided: June 15, 2005.
Joseph E. Macon, Appellant pro se.
Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Joseph E. Macon appeals the district court's order accepting the recommenda tion of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Macon v. Richey, No. CA-04-1310-6-HFF (D.S.C. Mar. 22, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED