Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. James E. DAVIS, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-05-15
Citations: 43 S.W.3d 906
Docket Number: No. ED 78184
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. James E. DAVIS, Appellant.
Judges: Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., and PAUL J. SIMON and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 43
Pages: 906–907

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. James E. DAVIS, Appellant.
No. ED 78184.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
May 15, 2001.
Irene Karns, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, MO, Attorneys for Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Lisa Sutherland, Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.
Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., and PAUL J. SIMON and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
James Davis (Defendant) appeals his conviction of possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute, section 195.211, RSMo 2000. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find there is sufficient evidence from which a reasonable juror might have found Defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Grim, 854 S.W.2d 403, 407 (Mo. banc 1998). An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).