Case Name: Kyle BESS, Appellant (Defendant below), v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee (Plaintiff below)
Court: Supreme Court of Indiana
Jurisdiction: Indiana
Decision Date: 2016-12-16
Citations: 65 N.E.3d 593
Docket Number: No. 09S02-1609-CR-484
Parties: Kyle BESS, Appellant (Defendant below), v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee (Plaintiff below).
Judges: All Justices concur.
Reporter: North Eastern Reporter 3d
Volume: 65
Pages: 593–594

Head Matter:
Kyle BESS, Appellant (Defendant below), v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee (Plaintiff below).
No. 09S02-1609-CR-484.
Supreme Court of Indiana.
Dec. 16, 2016.
Kyle Bess, New Castle, IN, Appellant Pro Se.
Gregory F. Zoeller, Attorney General of Indiana, Chandra K. Hein, Stephen R. Creason, Richard C. Webster, Deputy Attorneys General, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appellee.

Opinion:
On Petition for Rehearing
PER CURIAM.
Kyle Bess seeks rehearing from our opinion denying his request for sentencing relief under Indiana Appellate Rule 7(B). See Bess v. State, 58 N.E.3d 174 (Ind.2016). Bess takes issue with our statement that in soliciting his 14-year-old niece, Bess "had her sit on his lap." Id. Bess contends his niece did not, in fact, sit on his lap. He states he asked her to do so, but she declined. Bess contends this inaccuracy originated in the State's Appel-lee's Brief and that this "false statement impacted the decision made by the Indiana Supreme Court to affirm the trial court." Pet. for Reh'g at 11.
Bess is correct that the record reflects he solicited his niece to sit on his lap and she declined, not that he "had her sit on his lap." See Tr. 48, 51. This factual difference does not alter our original decision. We grant rehearing to correct the facts as reflected herein. In all other respects the original opinion is affirmed.
All Justices concur.