Case Name: George W. Wensley, Appellant, v. Wilton Randolph, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Common Pleas
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1894-08
Citations: 9 Misc. 457
Docket Number: 
Parties: George W. Wensley, Appellant, v. Wilton Randolph, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 9
Pages: 457–458

Head Matter:
George W. Wensley, Appellant, v. Wilton Randolph, Respondent.
(New York Common Pleas—Additional General Term,
August, 1894.)
An appeal will not lie to the Court of Common Pleas from an interlocutory order of a District Court.
Appeal from an order of the justice of the District Court for the second judicial district, granting a motion to open a default.
Wensley & Gilroy, for appellant.
Harrison & Byrd, for defendant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The power of this court to entertain appeals from District Courts is purely statutory. No authority for entertaining an appeal from an interlocutory order has been brought to our attention. Our jurisdiction is limited to appeals from judgments and final orders in summary proceedings. See Jacobs v. Zeltner, handed down herewith.
This appeal must, therefore, be dismissed, with costs to respondent.
Present: Bookstavee and Bischoff, JJ.
Appeal dismissed, with costs to respondent.