Case Name: Ohio State Bar Association v. Dye, Judge
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1991-07-03
Citations: 61 Ohio St. 3d 72
Docket Number: No. 90-2089
Parties: Ohio State Bar Association v. Dye, Judge.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 61
Pages: 72–74

Head Matter:
Ohio State Bar Association v. Dye, Judge.
[Cite as Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Dye (1991), 61 Ohio St.Sd 72.]
(No. 90-2089
Submitted March 20, 1991
Decided July 3, 1991.)
Albert L. Bell, William L. Burton and Edwin C. Johnston, for relator. Charles W. Kettlewell and James W. Ransbottom, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We adopt the board's findings of fact and conclusions of law and will accept the parties' strong recommendation. Thus, we hereby publicly reprimand respondent for having violated Canons 3(A)(2), 3(A)(3), 3(A)(4), 3(A)(5), and 3(B)(1) of the Code of Judicial Conduct. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.