Case Name: Edward B. Fitzpatrick, Jr. Construction Corp. et al., Appellants, v. County of Suffolk et al., Defendants, and Charles T. Walsh et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1988-12-01
Citations: 73 N.Y.2d 807
Docket Number: 
Parties: Edward B. Fitzpatrick, Jr. Construction Corp. et al., Appellants, v County of Suffolk et al., Defendants, and Charles T. Walsh et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 73
Pages: 807–807

Head Matter:
Edward B. Fitzpatrick, Jr. Construction Corp. et al., Appellants, v County of Suffolk et al., Defendants, and Charles T. Walsh et al., Respondents.
Submitted August 15, 1988;
decided December 1, 1988

Opinion:
Motion for leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as dismissed the complaint as against respondent Converse Ward David Dixon denied; motion otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the order insofar as it dismissed the complaint as against respondents Charles T. Walsh and Bowe, Walsh and Associates does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.