Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Petitioner on Review, v. LUCILO ROMERO BARAJAS, Respondent on Review
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1996-08-15
Citations: 324 Or. 40
Docket Number: CC 920534889; CA A75949; SC S41439
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Petitioner on Review, v. LUCILO ROMERO BARAJAS, Respondent on Review.
Judges: Before Carson, Chief Justice, and Gillette, Fadeley, Graber, and Durham, Justices.
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 324
Pages: 42–43

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted January 12, 1995, decision
of the Court of Appeals vacated, and case remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration August 15, 1996
See 145 Or App 600, 930 P2d 1180 (1997)
STATE OF OREGON, Petitioner on Review, v. LUCILO ROMERO BARAJAS, Respondent on Review.
(CC 920534889; CA A75949; SC S41439)
920 P2d 1097
Michael C. Livingston, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on the briefs were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General.
Peter Gartlan, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for respondent on review. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender.
Before Carson, Chief Justice, and Gillette, Fadeley, Graber, and Durham, Justices.
Appeal from Union County Circuit Court, Ronald D. Schenck, Judge. 127 Or App 749, 873 P2d 344 (1994).
Van Hoomissen, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case; Unis, J., retired June 30,1996, and did not participate in this decision.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in the light of State v. Cookman, 324 Or 19, 920 P2d 1086 (1996).
Gillette, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.