Case Name: The TRAVELERS INDEMNITY CO., a Connecticut corporation authorized to do business in the State of Florida, Appellant, v. WASHINGTON FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF MIAMI BEACH, and Cherry Grove, Inc., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1968-10-08
Citations: 214 So. 2d 492
Docket Number: No. 68-232
Parties: The TRAVELERS INDEMNITY CO., a Connecticut corporation authorized to do business in the State of Florida, Appellant, v. WASHINGTON FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF MIAMI BEACH, and Cherry Grove, Inc., Appellees.
Judges: Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and BARKDULL and HENDRY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 214
Pages: 492–492

Head Matter:
The TRAVELERS INDEMNITY CO., a Connecticut corporation authorized to do business in the State of Florida, Appellant, v. WASHINGTON FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF MIAMI BEACH, and Cherry Grove, Inc., Appellees.
No. 68-232.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
Oct. 8, 1968.
Joseph A. McGowan, Miami, for appellant.
Claude Pepper Law Offices and Adele T. Weaver, Miami Beach, for Washington Federal.
Howard R. Scharlin, Hialeah, for Cherry Grove.
Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and BARKDULL and HENDRY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, plaintiff in the trial court, seeks review of an adverse declaratory judgment determining a clause of a letter agreement.
The agreement in question was prepared by representatives of the plaintiff. It contained an ambiguity. The trial judge resolved the ambiguity in favor of the ap-pellee, Washington Federal Savings and Loan Association of Miami Beach, and we find no error in his construction. McGhee Interests, Inc. v. Alexander National Bank, 102 Fla. 140, 135 So. 545; Clark v. Clark, Fla.1955, 79 So.2d 426; Hall v. Hall, Fla. App.1961, 135 So.2d 432; Bacon v. Karr, Fla.App. 1962, 139 So.2d 166, 7 A.L.R.3d 889; Nat Harrison Associates, Inc. v. Florida Power & Light Company, Fla.App. 1964, 162 So.2d 298; Allegheny Mutual Casualty Company v. State, Fla.App.1965, 176 So.2d 362; S & W Motors v. Mack Trucks, Inc., Fla.App. 1967, 198 So.2d 70; 7 Fla.Jur., Contracts, § 73, 74 and 87.
Therefore, the declaratory judgment here under review be and the same is hereby affirmed.
Affirmed.