Case Name: Edward McDONALD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Respondent-Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1996-10-29
Citations: 932 S.W.2d 901
Docket Number: No. 69414
Parties: Edward McDONALD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Respondent-Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 932
Pages: 901–901

Head Matter:
Edward McDONALD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Respondent-Respondent.
No. 69414.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Oct. 29, 1996.
Robert S. Adler, St. Louis, for Petitioner-Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., James A Chenault, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for responden1>-respondent.
Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner appeals the denial of his request for a trial de novo to review the revocation of his driver's license under § 302.505, RSMo 1994, for driving with a blood-alcohol content of .10 percent or more. Petitioner alleges the trial court erred 1) in admitting exhibits A and B because the court failed to judicially recognize the relevant state regulations, and 2) that the records submitted to the court contained insufficient evidence to establish probable cause for arrest. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).