Case Name: Louis Hanneman et al., complainants and respondents, v. Matilda Richter et al., defendants and appellants
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1902-06-23
Citations: 63 N.J. Eq. 803
Docket Number: 
Parties: Louis Hanneman et al., complainants and respondents, v. Matilda Richter et al., defendants and appellants.
Judges: For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Collins, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Krueger, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees, Vroom—14.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 63
Pages: 803–803

Head Matter:
Louis Hanneman et al., complainants and respondents, v. Matilda Richter et al., defendants and appellants.
[Filed June 23d, 1902.]
Mr. Charles J. Roe, for the appellants.
Mr. Charles H. Hartshorne, for the respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated by the chancellor in the opinion delivered in the court below. See 17 Dick. Ch. Rep. 365.
For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Collins, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Krueger, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees, Vroom—14.
For reversal—Hone.