Case Name: Jeffrey MAUNE, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Preston WITTENBORN, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2008-11-25
Citations: 273 S.W.3d 554
Docket Number: No. ED 90911
Parties: Jeffrey MAUNE, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Preston WITTENBORN, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before BOOKER T. SHAW, P.J., and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and MARY K. HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 273
Pages: 554–555

Head Matter:
Jeffrey MAUNE, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Preston WITTENBORN, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 90911.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Nov. 25, 2008.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 13, 2009.
Terry J. Flanagan, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Stephen Keith Paulus, Cuba, MO, for Respondent.
Before BOOKER T. SHAW, P.J., and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and MARY K. HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Preston Wittenborn appeals from the trial court's judgment, which was based on an earlier default judgment, entered in favor of Jeffrey Maune. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(5). An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).