Case Name: Roger James SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2016-03-24
Citations: 188 So. 3d 911
Docket Number: No. 5D14-4029
Parties: Roger James SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: TORPY, BERGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 188
Pages: 911–911

Head Matter:
Roger James SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D14-4029.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
March 24, 2016.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Edward J. Weiss, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Young v. State, 141 So.3d 161, 165 (Fla.2013) (holding sufficiency of the evidence claim was not reviewable for fundamental error on appeal where defendant waived appellate review on- the specific issue of whether an uninhabitable building that had been undergoing renovation at the time of the break-in constituted a "dwelling" under the burglary statute, because defendant did not specifically argue at trial that the building was not a "dwelling" and the evidence established that, at the very least, defendant committed a burglary of a structure).
TORPY, BERGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.