Case Name: Maria PANTALEON-FLORES, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-05-03
Citations: 430 F. App'x 616
Docket Number: No. 10-71174
Parties: Maria PANTALEON-FLORES, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 430
Pages: 616–616

Head Matter:
Maria PANTALEON-FLORES, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 10-71174.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 20, 2011.
Filed May 3, 2011.
Maria Pantaleon-Flores, Santa Ana, CA, pro se.
Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, OIL, Arthur Leonid Rabin, Trial, Pegah Vakili, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: RYMER, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Maria Pantaleon-Flores, a native and citizen, petitions pro se for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying, as untimely, PantaleonFlores's second motion to reopen and reconsider the underlying denial of her application for cancellation of removal, based on her failure to establish the requisite hardship to her qualifying United States citizen children.
Pantaleon-Flores has waived any challenge to the BIA's decision denying her motion to reopen and reconsider by failing to raise any arguments related to the BIA's dispositive determination that the motion was untimely. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.