Case Name: MID-CONTINENT LIFE INSURANCE CO. v. MAUD STATE BANK et al.
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1923-02-06
Citations: 88 Okla. 197
Docket Number: No. 11008
Parties: MID-CONTINENT LIFE INSURANCE CO. v. MAUD STATE BANK et al.
Judges: JOHNSON, V. C. J., and KANE, NICHOLSON. and BRANSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 88
Pages: 197–197

Head Matter:
MID-CONTINENT LIFE INSURANCE CO. v. MAUD STATE BANK et al.
No. 11008
Opinion Filed Feb. 6. 1923.
(Syllabus.)
Appeal and Error — Failure to File Brief— Appeal May Be Dismissed.
Where the plaintiff in error fails to file a brief in conformity with the rules of the court, the appeal may be dismissed. Record examined, and held, that the appeal be dismissed.
Error from Superior Court, Pottawatomie County; Lennder 0. Pittman. Judge.
Action by Mid-Continent Life Insurance Company against the Maud State Bank et al. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
Dismissed.
Everest, Vaught & Brewer, for plaintiff in error.
Goode & Johnson, for defendant in error W. H. Brown.
A. M. Baldwin, for defendant in error Maud State Bank.

Opinion:
KENNAMER, J.
Mid-Continent Life Insurance Company, plaintiff in error, filed this appeal in this court on October 22, 1919, to reverse a judgment rendered in the superior court of Pottawatomie county in favor of the Maud State Bank et al.', defendants in error.
This case was set for submission on the 12th day of December, 1922, and on that date submitted to the court. On the 1st day of November, 1922, the plaintiff in error secured an extension of time of 30 days in which to file brief. On the 28th day of November, 1922, plaintiff in error was granted 60 days' additional time to file brief.
No brief has been filed nor excuse given why a brief has not been filed. In this situation this court may dismiss the appeal, and it is so ordered.
JOHNSON, V. C. J., and KANE, NICHOLSON. and BRANSON, JJ., concur.