Case Name: Yonkers School Crossing Guard Union of Westchester Chapter, CSEA, Inc., Appellant, v. City of Yonkers et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1976-07-01
Citations: 39 N.Y.2d 964
Docket Number: 
Parties: Yonkers School Crossing Guard Union of Westchester Chapter, CSEA, Inc., Appellant, v City of Yonkers et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 39
Pages: 964–966

Head Matter:
Yonkers School Crossing Guard Union of Westchester Chapter, CSEA, Inc., Appellant, v City of Yonkers et al., Respondents.
Argued May 4, 1976;
decided July 1, 1976
Arthur H. Grae and James M. Rose for appellant.
Eugene J. Fox, Corporation Counsel (William N. Carroll of counsel), for City of Yonkers, respondent.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Shirley Adelson Siegel and Samuel A. Hirshowitz of counsel), for New York State Emergency Financial Control Board for City of Yonkers, respondent.

Opinion:
Memorandum. Order of the Appellate Division affirmed, with costs.
Section (B) of article 9 of the collective agreement provides "Present members may be removed for cause but will not be removed as a result of Post elimination."
This clause is not a "job security" clause in the sense of those considered in Matter of Board of Educ. v Yonkers Federation of Teachers (40 NY2d 268) and Matter of Burke v Bowen (40 NY2d 264), decided herewith. In those cases, the job security clauses were explicit, unambiguous and comprehensive. In contrast, the instant clause is ambiguous and most likely was included to protect individual employees from manipulated termination of services due to the elimination of a particular post.
On this view, it is unnecessary, assuming it to be relevant, to reach the constitutional question of whether the employer's action impaired the obligation of the contract.
Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur in memorandum.
Order affirmed.