Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel Leon PERRY, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-12-02
Citations: 353 F. App'x 798
Docket Number: No. 09-7271
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel Leon PERRY, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Cmcuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 353
Pages: 798–798

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel Leon PERRY, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-7271.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 19, 2009.
Decided: Dec. 2, 2009.
Daniel Leon Perry, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Cmcuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this cmcuit.
PER CURIAM:
Daniel Leon Perry, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Perry, No. 5:06-cr-00080-F-1 (E.D.N.C. June 29, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.