Case Name: Harold Goldfarb, Appellant-Respondent, v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Greater New York, Respondent-Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1981-01-06
Citations: 79 A.D.2d 908
Docket Number: 
Parties: Harold Goldfarb, Appellant-Respondent, v Blue Cross Blue Shield of Greater New York, Respondent-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 79
Pages: 908–908

Head Matter:
Harold Goldfarb, Appellant-Respondent, v Blue Cross Blue Shield of Greater New York, Respondent-Appellant.

Opinion:
Order, Appellate Term, First Department, entered on February 8, 1980, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs and without disbursements, and plaintiff's motion for summary judgment granted on constraint of Danzig v Dikman (78 AD2d 303). The parties are directed to settle an order and, in the event of their inability so to do, the matter is remanded to the Special Term of Civil Court for the entry of an appropriate order in accordance herewith. Settle order. Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Sandler, Markewich, Silverman and Bloom, JJ.