Case Name: UNITED STATES, Appellee v. LASCELLES W. STRACHAN, Specialist Four, U. S. Army, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Military Appeals
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1969-07-03
Citations: 18 C.M.A. 438
Docket Number: No. 21,966
Parties: UNITED STATES, Appellee v LASCELLES W. STRACHAN, Specialist Four, U. S. Army, Appellant
Judges: 
Reporter: Decisions of the United States Court of Military Appeals
Volume: 18
Pages: 438–439

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES, Appellee v LASCELLES W. STRACHAN, Specialist Four, U. S. Army, Appellant
18 USCMA 438, 40 CMR 150
No. 21,966
July 3, 1969
Colonel Daniel T. Ghent and Major John Wall Hanft were on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.
Lieutenant Colonel David Rarick, Major Edwin P. Wasinger, and Captain John C. Lenahan were on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion:
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam:
The issue in this case is controlled by our opinion in United States v Johnson, 18 USCMA 436, 40 CMR 148. In Johnson, we held the law officer erred to the substantial prejudice of the accused by failing to instruct the court that in voting on the proposed sentences, it should begin by first considering the lightest; until § sentence is adopted by the concurrence of the required number of members. Paragraph 766(2), Manual for Court's-Martial, United States, 1951. So, too, here. Reversal on sentence is required.
The decision of the board of review as to sentence is reversed. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army. A rehearing on sentence may be ordered.