Case Name: Keithlyn Gant, Respondent, v. Michael Sparacino, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1994-04-25
Citations: 203 A.D.2d 515
Docket Number: 
Parties: Keithlyn Gant, Respondent, v Michael Sparacino, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 203
Pages: 515–515

Head Matter:
Keithlyn Gant, Respondent, v Michael Sparacino, Appellant.
[612 NYS2d 952]

Opinion:
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Milano, J.), dated June 18, 1992, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
There is evidence in the record that, as a result of injuries suffered in an automobile accident with the defendant, the plaintiff was out of work for 16 weeks. This fact, if true, is sufficient to meet the threshold requirement of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) that the plaintiff make a prima facie showing of "serious injury". A court in deciding a summary judgment motion must view all the evidence in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion (see, Passonno v Hall, 125 AD2d 767), and if there is a triable issue of fact, must deny the motion (see, Hourigan v McGarry, 106 AD2d 845). Therefore, the Supreme Court correctly denied the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Sullivan, J. P., Lawrence, Pizzuto, Joy and Goldstein, JJ., concur.