Case Name: Charles Seligson, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Ira Haupt & Co., Respondent, v. Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, Appellant; Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. American Express Company, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent; Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Bunge Corporation et al., Third-Party Defendants; Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent, and Morton Kamerman et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1969-09-25
Citations: 33 A.D.2d 516
Docket Number: 
Parties: Charles Seligson, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Ira Haupt & Co., Respondent, v. Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, Appellant. Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. American Express Company, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent. Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Bunge Corporation et al., Third-Party Defendants. Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent, and Morton Kamerman et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 33
Pages: 516–516

Head Matter:
Charles Seligson, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Ira Haupt & Co., Respondent, v. Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, Appellant. Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. American Express Company, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent. Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Bunge Corporation et al., Third-Party Defendants. Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent, and Morton Kamerman et al., Respondents.

Opinion:
Order entered on March 18, 1969, unanimously affirmed, with $30 costs and disbursements to respondent Kamerman. The matter of disclosure proceedings has been committed to Mr. Justice Carney, and we assume that, in due course and on proper application to him, such examination of partners will be allowed as reasonably necessary to secure proper disclosure and that, furthermore, in due course and upon a proper showing, an examination of third-party witnesses (including former employees) may be had if material and necessary in the prosecution or defense of the action. Concur— Eager, J. P., Capozzoli, Tilzer, Nunez and Maeken, JJ.