Case Name: Neal SNYDER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2008-09-09
Citations: 262 S.W.3d 675
Docket Number: No. ED 90276
Parties: Neal SNYDER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before BOOKER T. SHAW, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and MARY K HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 262
Pages: 675–675

Head Matter:
Neal SNYDER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 90276.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Sept. 9, 2008.
Timothy Joseph Forneris, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, Joshua N. Cor-man — co-counsel, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before BOOKER T. SHAW, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and MARY K HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant Neal Snyder appeals from the circuit court's judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude that the trial court's judgment was based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).