Case Name: Nancy A. SCHMITT-DOSS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERICAN REGENT, INC.; Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Defendants-Appellees, and Daiichi Sankyo Company, Ltd of Japan, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-04-01
Citations: 599 F. App'x 71
Docket Number: No. 14-1891
Parties: Nancy A. SCHMITT-DOSS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERICAN REGENT, INC.; Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Defendants-Appellees, and Daiichi Sankyo Company, Ltd of Japan, Defendant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 599
Pages: 71–72

Head Matter:
Nancy A. SCHMITT-DOSS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERICAN REGENT, INC.; Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Defendants-Appellees, and Daiichi Sankyo Company, Ltd of Japan, Defendant.
No. 14-1891.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 24, 2015.
Decided: April 1, 2015.
Nancy A. Schmitt-Doss, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Douglas Loftis, Woods Rogers, PLC, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Nancy A. Schmitt-Doss appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to Defendants on her complaint seeking damages for personal injuries under Virginia tort law. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Schmitt-Doss v. Am. Regent, Inc., No. 6:12-cv-00040-NKM-RSB, 2014 WL 3853184 (W.D.Va. Aug. 5, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because- the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.