Case Name: In re: Jermaine Jerrell SIMS, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-07-16
Citations: 103 F. App'x 721
Docket Number: No. 04-6860
Parties: In re: Jermaine Jerrell SIMS, Petitioner.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 103
Pages: 721–722

Head Matter:
In re: Jermaine Jerrell SIMS, Petitioner.
No. 04-6860.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted June 21, 2004.
Decided July 16, 2004.
Jermaine Jerrell Sims, Petitioner pro se.
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Jermaine Jerrell Sims petitions for writ of mandamus. He seeks an order mandating disciplinary action against the attorney who prosecuted his case and relief from his criminal conviction.
Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. See In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn., 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir.1988). Further, mandamus is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. See Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402, 96 S.Ct. 2119, 48 L.Ed.2d 725 (1976); In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir.1987). Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. See In re United Steelworkers, 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir.1979).
The relief sought by Sims is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DISMISSED