Case Name: Mary Kimball, an Infant, by Mary Lindsley, Her Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Erie Railroad Company, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1928-01
Citations: 222 A.D. 850
Docket Number: 
Parties: Mary Kimball, an Infant, by Mary Lindsley, Her Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Erie Railroad Company, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 222
Pages: 850–850

Head Matter:
Mary Kimball, an Infant, by Mary Lindsley, Her Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Erie Railroad Company, Appellant.

Opinion:
Judgment and order reversed on the law and the facts, and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the grounds that the charge that defendant was required to exercise especial care was erroneous, and that the submission of the questiori of the permanency of the injuries was not warranted by the evidence. Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman, Whitmyer, Hill and Hasbrouck, JJ., concur.