Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Miguel ESLAVA-ORDINOLA, a.k.a. Miguel Angel Eslava-Ordinola, a.k.a. Alejandro S. Sanchez, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-09-23
Citations: 294 F. App'x 316
Docket Number: No. 06-10287
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Miguel ESLAVA-ORDINOLA, a.k.a. Miguel Angel Eslava-Ordinola, a.k.a. Alejandro S. Sanchez, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 294
Pages: 316–316

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Miguel ESLAVA-ORDINOLA, a.k.a. Miguel Angel Eslava-Ordinola, a.k.a. Alejandro S. Sanchez, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-10287.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 8, 2008.
Filed Sept. 23, 2008.
Christina Marie Cabanillas, Assistant U.S., Claire Kiehl Lefkowitz, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Miguel Eslava-Ordinola, Beaumont, TX, pro se.
Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Miguel Eslava-Ordinola appeals from the 51-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Eslava-Ordinola's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no arguable grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
We have conducted an independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988). We dismiss in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir. 2000).
Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.