Case Name: Charles Nathan FOX, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-11-10
Citations: 608 So. 2d 132
Docket Number: No. 92-835
Parties: Charles Nathan FOX, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and HUBBART, JJ
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 608
Pages: 132–132

Head Matter:
Charles Nathan FOX, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 92-835.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 10, 1992.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Bruce A. Rosenthal, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Consuelo Maingot and Francine Thomas, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and HUBBART, JJ

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Because the appellant's sole point on the merits presents only harmless error, State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986), the convictions under review are affirmed. The cause is remanded for resentencing within the appropriate cell without including legal constraint points under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701 d. 6. The fact that the defendant was on felony bond when the offenses were committed does not permit such an assessment. Brown v. State, 569 So.2d 1223 (Fla.1990); Mosely v. State, 543 So.2d 340 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Mize v. State, 495 So.2d 845 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part.