Case Name: Hugh A. Smith, petitioner-appellant, v. Charlotte M. Loveland Smith, defendant-respondent
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1918-01-31
Citations: 88 N.J. Eq. 599
Docket Number: 
Parties: Hugh A. Smith, petitioner-appellant, v. Charlotte M. Loveland Smith, defendant-respondent.
Judges: For affirmance — Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner — 13.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 88
Pages: 599–599

Head Matter:
Hugh A. Smith, petitioner-appellant, v. Charlotte M. Loveland Smith, defendant-respondent.
[Decided January 31st, 1918.]
On appeal front a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Baches, whose opinion is reported in '98 All. Rep. SJfi-
Mr. John H. Kafes, for the appellant.
Mr. Alexander Trapp, for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed front will be affirmed, for thé reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Baches.
For affirmance — Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner — 13.
For reversal — None.