Case Name: Harris Christian Nagel, Resp't, v. Albert A. Adler et al., App'lts
Court: New York City Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1894-11-20
Citations: 63 N.Y. St. Rep. 251
Docket Number: 
Parties: Harris Christian Nagel, Resp’t, v. Albert A. Adler et al App’lts.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 63
Pages: 251–251

Head Matter:
Harris Christian Nagel, Resp’t, v. Albert A. Adler et al App’lts.
(New York City Court, General Term,
Filed November 20, 1894.)
Appeal—Conflicting evidence.
A verdict, on conflicting evidence, will not be disturbed on appeal.
Appeal from a judgment on a verdict in favor of plaintiff.
Philipp J. Britt, for app’lts; Charles L. Subbell, for resp’t.

Opinion:
McCarthy, J.
This trial involved a question of fact, which was fairly submitted under proper instructions. The jury having found on the facts against the defendants, and on conflicting evidence, we see no reason to disturb the same.
Judgment is therefore affirmed, with costs.
All concur.