Case Name: James and Charlotte COKER, Robert and Rebecca Darconte, and Donald and Bonita Shoe v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION.
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 2005-11-03
Citations: 623 S.E.2d 581
Docket Number: No. 532A05.
Parties: James and Charlotte COKER, Robert and Rebecca Darconte, and Donald and Bonita Shoe
v.
DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Eastern Reporter 2d
Volume: 623
Pages: 581–581

Head Matter:
James and Charlotte COKER, Robert and Rebecca Darconte, and Donald and Bonita Shoe
v.
DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION.
No. 532A05.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
November 3, 2005.
Mona Lisa Wallace, Salisbury, Cathy Williams, K. Edward Greene, Raleigh, Gary K. Shipman, Wilmington, for James Coker, et al.
Sidney S. Eagles, Jr., Raleigh, Allison O. VanLanningham, Greensboro, Raymond M. Kethledge, Troy, MI, for DaimlerChrysler Corp.
ORDER

Opinion:
Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by Plaintiffs on the 20th day of September 2005 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of November 2005."
Plaintiff shall forthwith submit an appeal bond to this Court, as provided by Appellate Rule 17(b). The bond may be in cash or by a written undertaking with good and sufficient surety in the sum of $250.00.
Accordingly, only those issues which are the basis of the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals shall be presented to this Court in briefs. The Plaintiff's new brief so limited in scope shall be filed with this Court not more that 30 days from the date of certification of this order.