Case Name: Gregory SELDEN, Appellant v. AIRBNB, INC., Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-02-02
Citations: 681 F. App'x 1
Docket Number: No. 16-7139
Parties: Gregory SELDEN, Appellant v. AIRBNB, INC., Appellee
Judges: BEFORE: Henderson, Brown, and Pillard, Circuit Judges
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 681
Pages: 1–2

Head Matter:
Gregory SELDEN, Appellant v. AIRBNB, INC., Appellee
No. 16-7139
September Term, 2016
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Filed On: February 2, 2017
Ikechukwu Emejuru, Emejuru & Nyom-bi LLC, Silver Spring, MD, for Plaintiff-Appellant
Sean Marotta, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee
BEFORE: Henderson, Brown, and Pillard, Circuit Judges

Opinion:
ORDER
Per Curiam
Upon consideration of the motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, the response thereto, and the reply; and the Rule 28(j) letters, it is
ORDERED that the motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction be granted. The district court's order compelling arbitration and staying litigation pending arbitration is not appealable. 9 U.S.C. § 16(b); see also Green Tree Fin. Corp.-Ala. v. Randolph, 531 U.S. 79, 87 n.2, 121 S.Ct. 513, 148 L.Ed.2d 373 (2000). Appellant has not shown that the order is appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), because it does not have the "practical effect" of denying an injunction that "affects predominantly all of the merits" or "might have a serious, perhaps irreparable, consequence, and . can be effectually challenged only by immediate appeal." See Salazar ex rel. Salazar v. District of Columbia, 671 F.3d 1258, 1262 (D.C. Cir. 2012) (brackets and internal quotations omitted); see also Everett v. US Airways Group, Inc., 132 F.3d 770, 774-75 (D.C. Cir. 1998). Nor has appellant shown it is appealable under a pendent jurisdiction theory, see Loan Syndications & Trading Ass'n v. S.E.C., 818 F.3d 716, 723 (D.C. Cir. 2016), or the collateral order doctrine, see Mohawk Indus., Inc. v. Carpenter, 558 U.S. 100, 106, 130 S.Ct. 599, 175 L.Ed.2d 458 (2009); Everett, 132 F.3d at 773.
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.