Case Name: Abraham A. Roth, Respondent, v. Sam Perillo et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1959-12-21
Citations: 9 A.D.2d 922
Docket Number: 
Parties: Abraham A. Roth, Respondent, v. Sam Perillo et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 9
Pages: 922–922

Head Matter:
Abraham A. Roth, Respondent, v. Sam Perillo et al., Appellants.

Opinion:
In an action to recover damages for slander, the appeal is from an order denying a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action (Rules Civ. Prae¡, rule 106, subd. 4). It is alleged that appellants said of respondent, Who has been engaged in the construction of buildings for over 35 years, that he was a "conniving" builder. No special damages are pleaded. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Wenzel, Acting P. j., Beldock, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.