Case Name: Violet W. COLLINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sonya TOMAN, Director; Barbara Jones, Assistant Director; Regina French, Administrative Officer; Beaufort County Department of Social Services, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-10-15
Citations: 485 F. App'x 621
Docket Number: No. 12-1712
Parties: Violet W. COLLINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sonya TOMAN, Director; Barbara Jones, Assistant Director; Regina French, Administrative Officer; Beaufort County Department of Social Services, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 485
Pages: 621–621

Head Matter:
Violet W. COLLINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sonya TOMAN, Director; Barbara Jones, Assistant Director; Regina French, Administrative Officer; Beaufort County Department of Social Services, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 12-1712.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 11, 2012.
Decided: Oct. 15, 2012.
Violet W. Collins, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher J. Geis, Sonny Sade Haynes, Womble, Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, PLLC, Winston-Salem, North Carlina, for Appellees.
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Violet W. Collins appeals the district court's order granting the Defendants' motion for summary judgment in her pro se civil action filed under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended ("Title VII"), 42 U.S.C.A. § 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2003 & Supp.2012), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended ("ADEA"), 29 U.S.C.A. § 621-34 (West 2008 & Supp.2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Collins v. Toman, No. 4:10-cv-00198-H (E.D.N.C. May 29, 2012). We deny Collins' motion for appointment of counsel and grant Collins' motion to withdraw her application to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.