Case Name: Eskedar TESHOME-GEBREEGZIABHER, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-10-30
Citations: 545 F.3d 285
Docket Number: No. 08-1060
Parties: Eskedar TESHOME-GEBREEGZIABHER, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Chief Judge WILLIAMS joins this concurring opinion.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 545
Pages: 285–293

Head Matter:
Eskedar TESHOME-GEBREEGZIABHER, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 08-1060.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Oct. 30, 2008.
Jason Alexander Dzubow, Attorney, Mensah, Butler & Dzubow, PLLC, Washington, DC, Lee P. Gelernt, American Civil Liberties Union, New York, NY, for Petitioner.
David V. Bernal, Brianne Whelan Cohen, Trial Attorney, Thomas Henderson Dupree, Jr., Carol Federighi, Senior Litigation Counsel, Robert N. Markle, U. S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Stuart S. Nickum, Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Raphael Choi, Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security Office of the Chief Counsel, Arlington, VA, George William Maugans, III, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Baltimore, MD, for Respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
Petitioner filed a petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc. Respondent filed a response.
The panel voted to deny panel rehearing.
A member of the Court requested a poll of the Court on the petition for rehearing en banc. Chief Judge Williams, Judge Wilkinson, Judge Niemeyer, Judge Trax-ler, Judge Shedd, Judge Duncan, and Judge Agee voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc. Judge Michael, Judge Motz, Judge King, and Judge Gregory voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc.
The Court denies the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc.
Judge Shedd wrote an opinion concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc, in which Chief Judge Williams joins. Judge Michael wrote an opinion dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc, in which Judge Motz, Judge King, and Judge Gregory join.