Case Name: Ella Hay et al., Respondents, v. Oregon Improvement Company, Appellant
Court: Washington Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Washington
Decision Date: 1898-12-05
Citations: 20 Wash. 711
Docket Number: No. 2702
Parties: Ella Hay et al., Respondents, v. Oregon Improvement Company, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Washington Reports
Volume: 20
Pages: 711–712

Head Matter:
[No. 2702.
Decided December 5, 1898.]
Ella Hay et al., Respondents, v. Oregon Improvement Company, Appellant.
Appeal from Superior Court, King County.—Hon. Orange Jacobs, Judge.
Reversed.
Burleigh & Piles, for appellant.
John E. Humphries, W. E. Humphrey, and E. P. Edsen, for respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The questions presented in this case are the same as those which were submitted in the case of Hughes v. Oregon Improvement Company, ante, p. 294. The issues are similar and the evidence is practically the same as was the evidence in that case, and for the reasons assigned in the opinion therein, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded, with directions to enter judgment in favor of appellant.
Dunbak, J.—For the reasons expressed in dissenting opinion in Mary Hughes et al. v. Oregon Improvement Co., ante, p. 294, I dissent.
Reavis, J., dissents.