Case Name: Oscar HANSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2003-03-12
Citations: 839 So. 2d 859
Docket Number: No. 2D02-3665
Parties: Oscar HANSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: NORTHCUTT and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 839
Pages: 859–860

Head Matter:
Oscar HANSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D02-3665.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
March 12, 2003.
Kevin A. Fuller of Law Offices of Kevin A. Fuller, Bayonet Point, for Appellant.

Opinion:
STRINGER, Judge.
Oscar Hanson challenges the order of the trial court summarily denying his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm.
In his motion, Hanson alleged that his pleas were involuntary because trial counsel affirmatively misadvised him that the convictions could not be used in the future as prior offenses for sentencing purposes. In Stansel v. State, 825 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), we held that this claim is not cognizable in a rule 3.850 motion. We certify the same question that we certified in Stansel.
Affirmed.
NORTHCUTT and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.