Case Name: In the Matter of the Application of The City of New York, Relative to Acquiring Title Wherever the Same Has Not Been Heretofore Acquired for the Same Purpose in Fee to the Real Property Required for the Opening and Extending of Amstel Avenue, from Far Rockaway Boulevard to Beach 71st Street; Hammels Boulevard, from Amstel Avenue to Beach Channel Drive; and Beach Channel Drive, from Hammels Boulevard to 116th Street, as Amended; in the Borough of Queens, City of New York. Jamieson & Bond Company, Appellant; The City of New York, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1940-01-22
Citations: 258 A.D. 981
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Application of The City of New York, Relative to Acquiring Title Wherever the Same Has Not Been Heretofore Acquired for the Same Purpose in Fee to the Real Property Required for the Opening and Extending of Amstel Avenue, from Far Rockaway Boulevard to Beach 71st Street; Hammels Boulevard, from Amstel Avenue to Beach Channel Drive; and Beach Channel Drive, from Hammels Boulevard to 116th Street, as Amended; in the Borough of Queens, City of New York. Jamieson & Bond Company, Appellant; The City of New York, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 258
Pages: 981–981

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Application of The City of New York, Relative to Acquiring Title Wherever the Same Has Not Been Heretofore Acquired for the Same Purpose in Fee to the Real Property Required for the Opening and Extending of Amstel Avenue, from Far Rockaway Boulevard to Beach 71st Street; Hammels Boulevard, from Amstel Avenue to Beach Channel Drive; and Beach Channel Drive, from Hammels Boulevard to 116th Street, as Amended; in the Borough of Queens, City of New York. Jamieson & Bond Company, Appellant; The City of New York, Respondent.

Opinion:
The Jamieson & Bond Company appeal from an order denying its motion to vacate a notice of motion made by respondent to vacate and set aside a final decree entered January 27, 1926, in so far as it made an award to the appellant; and to stay further proceedings by respondent to vacate such final decree. Order affirmed, without costs. Stay vacated. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Close, JJ., concur.