Case Name: Henry S. Chittick, Appellant, v. Thompson Hill Development Corporation, Bessie Rosenson and Others, Respondents, and Others, Defendants. (Action No. 1.) Henby S. Chittick, Appellant, v. Thompson Hill Development Corporation, Bessie Rosenson and Others, Respondents, and Others, Defendants. (Action No. 2.)
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1931-02
Citations: 232 A.D. 756
Docket Number: 
Parties: Henry S. Chittick, Appellant, v. Thompson Hill Development Corporation, Bessie Rosenson and Others, Respondents, and Others, Defendants. (Action No. 1.) Henby S. Chittick, Appellant, v. Thompson Hill Development Corporation, Bessie Rosenson and Others, Respondents, and Others, Defendants. (Action No. 2.)
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 232
Pages: 756–756

Head Matter:
Henry S. Chittick, Appellant, v. Thompson Hill Development Corporation, Bessie Rosenson and Others, Respondents, and Others, Defendants. (Action No. 1.) Henby S. Chittick, Appellant, v. Thompson Hill Development Corporation, Bessie Rosenson and Others, Respondents, and Others, Defendants. (Action No. 2.)

Opinion:
Motion for reargument denied, but without prejudice to an application for leave under rule 19. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ.
See App. Div. Rules, 2d Dept., rule 19 — ÍRep.