Case Name: Bernard J. Ludwig et al., Respondents, v. Rolland E. Gove, Appellant
Court: New York City Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1895-10
Citations: 14 Misc. 233
Docket Number: 
Parties: Bernard J. Ludwig et al., Respondents, v. Rolland E. Gove, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 14
Pages: 233–234

Head Matter:
Bernard J. Ludwig et al., Respondents, v. Rolland E. Gove, Appellant.
(City Court of New York
General Term,
October, 1895.)
An appeal will not lie fromT'an order sustaining a demurrer, to an answer with leave to amend.
Appeal from order sustaining demurrer to answer,, with leave to amend.
Fellowes & Wright, for appellant.
■ Wager & Acker, for respondents.

Opinion:
Fitzsimons, J.
The plaintiffs demurred to the defendant's answer. The demurrer, was sustained, with leave to the defendant to amend his answer. An order to that effect was-entered. From such order this appeal is taken. .
The appeal must he dismissed because, from the order entered herein, no appeal lies. Denslow v. Bush, 9 Misc. Rep. 337.
Appeal dismissed, with costs.
Yan 'Wyck, Oh. J.,. concurs. .
Appeal dismissed, with costs.