Case Name: In the interest of C.T. and C.T., Minors
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-08-22
Citations: 25 S.W.3d 623
Docket Number: Nos. ED 76515, ED 76516
Parties: In the interest of C.T. and C.T., Minors.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., P.J., MARY RHODES RUSSELL, J., and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 25
Pages: 623–624

Head Matter:
In the interest of C.T. and C.T., Minors.
Nos. ED 76515, ED 76516.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Aug. 22, 2000.
Dennis J. Curland, Clayton, for appellant.
Nancy J. Pew, Clayton, for respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., P.J., MARY RHODES RUSSELL, J., and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant F.T. appeals the judgment terminating her parental rights entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County as to her children C.T. and C.T. She argues that the termination was against the weight of the evidence and contrary to Section 211.447.4 RSMo (Supp.1999).
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and no error of law appears. The trial court's findings are supported by clear, cogent and convincing evidence. No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an extended opinion reciting detailed facts and restating principles of law. We have, however, provided the parties with a memorandum opinion, for their exclusive use, detailing the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).