Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fidel MARTINEZ-MORALES, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-08-15
Citations: 73 F. App'x 259
Docket Number: No. 02-50359; D.C. No. CR-01-01051-DDP-02
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Fidel MARTINEZ-MORALES, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, HAWKINS and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 73
Pages: 259–260

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Fidel MARTINEZ-MORALES, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 02-50359.
D.C. No. CR-01-01051-DDP-02.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 11, 2003.
Decided Aug. 15, 2003.
Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, HAWKINS and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Fidel Martinez-Morales appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 51-month sentence for conspiracy to transport aliens, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(l)(A)(v)(I). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Martinez-Morales' counsel has filed a brief stating that he finds no meritorious issues for review, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our examination of the brief and our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no arguable issues for review on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.