Case Name: DAVID JORDAN v. TIDEWATER POWER COMPANY
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 1920-10-27
Citations: 180 N.C. 664
Docket Number: 
Parties: DAVID JORDAN v. TIDEWATER POWER COMPANY.
Judges: 
Reporter: North Carolina Reports
Volume: 180
Pages: 664–664

Head Matter:
DAVID JORDAN v. TIDEWATER POWER COMPANY.
(Filed 27 October, 1920.)
Negligence — Instructions.
Appeal from Quion, J., at April Term, 1920, of New Hanover. Tbe following issues were submitted:
“1. Was tbe plaintiff injured by tbe negligence of tbe defendant, as alleged in tbe complaint? Answer: No.’
“2. Wbat damages, if any, is tbe plaintiff entitled to recover?”
From judgment rendered plaintiff appealed.
' Wright & Stevens and W. P. Stacy for plaintiff.
Rountree & Davis for defendant.

Opinion:
Peb Oubiam.
There are 41 assignments of error in tbe record. Five of them relate to tbe evidence. Tbe remaining assignments are directed to tbe charge of tbe judge. It is impossible to consider all of tbe assignments in an opinion of reasonable length. We have carefully examined them, and can find no substantial error. Tbe charge of tbe judge is full and clear, and based upon tbe principles of law as laid down in Bagwell v. R. R., 167 N. C., 611, and Crampton v. Ivie, 126 N. C., 894.
No error.