Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Newby Franklin LOVE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1989-02-13
Citations: 867 F.2d 209
Docket Number: No. 88-7647
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Newby Franklin LOVE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WIDENER, ERVIN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 867
Pages: 209–209

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Newby Franklin LOVE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 88-7647.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Argued Dec. 8, 1988.
Decided Feb. 13, 1989.
Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc Denied March 21,1989.
William Otis Kneece (Kneece, Kneece, Ashley, Gibbons & Kneece, on brief) for defendant-appellant.
David Jarlath Slattery, Asst. U.S. Atty. (Vinton D. Lide, U.S. Atty., on brief), for plaintiff-appellee.
Before WIDENER, ERVIN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Newby Franklin Love has appealed from the denial of his motion to vacate sentence by the District Court of South Carolina. Although the two cases were not consolidated for purposes of appeal, Love's oral argument was heard in this court at the same time as that of Robert Edward Lee, an original co-defendant, and the assignments of error pressed by Love and Lee are substantially identical.
After taking into consideration the briefs, oral arguments, and pertinent authorities, we affirm the denial of Love's motion for the reasons fully articulated in the opinion filed in the companion case of United States v. Lee, 867 F.2d 206 (4th Cir.1989).
AFFIRMED.
. 28 U.S.C. § 2255.