Case Name: Raymond L. CRAWFORD, d/b/a Raymond L. Crawford, Construction Company, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. HEMPHILL CONTRACTING COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1988-06-14
Citations: 752 S.W.2d 466
Docket Number: No. 53787
Parties: Raymond L. CRAWFORD, d/b/a Raymond L. Crawford, Construction Company, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. HEMPHILL CONTRACTING COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 752
Pages: 466–466

Head Matter:
Raymond L. CRAWFORD, d/b/a Raymond L. Crawford, Construction Company, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. HEMPHILL CONTRACTING COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 53787.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
June 14, 1988.
James Edward Terry, St. Louis, for defendant-appellant.
Eugene Edward Coon, Jr., Clayton, for plaintiff-respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals from trial court jury's verdict and judgment for plaintiff on its suit for contractual payments. We affirm. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).