Case Name: In the Matter of the Application of the City of New York, Appellant, Relative to Acquiring Title to Real Property Required for the Opening and Extending of East River Drive, and Approaches Thereto, in the Borough of Manhattan. Guy Cary et al., as Ancillary Executors of Robert W. Goelet, et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1949-01-13
Citations: 298 N.Y. 843
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Application of the City of New York, Appellant, Relative to Acquiring Title to Real Property Required for the Opening and Extending of East River Drive, and Approaches Thereto, in the Borough of Manhattan. Guy Cary et al., as Ancillary Executors of Robert W. Goelet, et al., Respondents.
Judges: Concur: Loughrah, Ch. J., Lewis, DesmoND, Dye and Fuld, JJ.
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 298
Pages: 843–845

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Application of the City of New York, Appellant, Relative to Acquiring Title to Real Property Required for the Opening and Extending of East River Drive, and Approaches Thereto, in the Borough of Manhattan. Guy Cary et al., as Ancillary Executors of Robert W. Goelet, et al., Respondents.
Argued November 30, 1948;
decided January 13, 1949.
John P. McGrath, Corporation Counsel (Reuben Levy, Harry E. O’Donnell and Benjamin Offner of counsel), for appellant.
Charles Lamb, Louis W. Dawson, Vincent Kerne and Walter L. Hophins for G-uy Cary and others, respondents.
Edward E. Clark and Leonard J .Reynolds for George Y. R. J. Innes-Ker, respondent.

Opinion:
Order affirmed, with costs to each respondent; no opinion.
Concur: Loughrah, Ch. J., Lewis, DesmoND, Dye and Fuld, JJ.