Case Name: Rose ISBELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Stephen FRIEDMAN; Joseph, Greenwald and Laake, PA, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-02-13
Citations: 465 F. App'x 226
Docket Number: No. 11-2113
Parties: Rose ISBELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Stephen FRIEDMAN; Joseph, Greenwald and Laake, PA, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 465
Pages: 226–226

Head Matter:
Rose ISBELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Stephen FRIEDMAN; Joseph, Greenwald and Laake, PA, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 11-2113.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 9, 2012.
Decided: Feb. 13, 2012.
Rose Isbell, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Michael Creed, Veronica B. Nannis, Joseph, Greenwald & Laake, PA, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Rose Isbell appeals the district court's order dismissing her complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Isbell v. Friedman, No. 8:11-cv-01152-AW, 2011 WL 4381422 (D. Md. filed Sept. 16, 2011, entered Sept. 19, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.