Case Name: DARLINGTON v. BUTLER (KOHN, Intervener.)
Court: Supreme Court of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1906-03-01
Citations: 7 Cal. Unrep. 246
Docket Number: 
Parties: DARLINGTON v. BUTLER (KOHN, Intervener.)
Judges: 
Reporter: California Unreported Cases
Volume: 7
Pages: 246–247

Head Matter:
DARLINGTON v. BUTLER (KOHN, Intervener.)
Court of Appeal, Third District;
March 1, 1906.
85 Pac. 931.
Appeal—Dismissal.—The Consideration of a Motion to Dismiss an appeal by an intervener, on the ground that he is not a party aggrieved, will be postponed, where some of the questions involved in the appeal will have to be considered in determining the motion.
APPEAL from Superior Court, El Dorado County; N. D. Amot, Judge.
Action by Abe Darlington against Sarah Butler; Nathan L. Kohn, Intervener. From the judgment rendered, the in tervener appeals. Original application to dismiss appeal. Consideration postponed.
Wm. F. Bray for appellant; Chas. A. Swisler for respondent.
For subsequent opinion, see 3 Cal. App. 448, 86 Pac. 194.

Opinion:
BUCKLES, J.
This is an original application to dismiss the appeal pending in this court, brought here by Nathan L. Kohn, the intervener in the court below. The motion is made by the respondent upon the ground that said intervener is not a party aggrieved by the judgment and order appealed from, and that he has no right to appeal. As some of the questions involved in the appeal would have to be considered in determining this motion, we think the further consideration of the motion should be postponed and be taken up with the appeal when it is presented.
It is therefore ordered that the determination of the motion to dismiss the appeal be postponed, to be taken up with the appeal when said appeal is presented and determined at that time.
We concur: Chipman, P. J.; McLaughlin, J.