Case Name: In the Matter of Joseph Bleich, Respondent, against William O'Dwyer et al., Constituting the Board of Estimate of the City of New York, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1947-10-17
Citations: 297 N.Y. 652
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Joseph Bleich, Respondent, against William O’Dwyer et al., Constituting the Board of Estimate of the City of New York, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 297
Pages: 652–654

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Joseph Bleich, Respondent, against William O’Dwyer et al., Constituting the Board of Estimate of the City of New York, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.
Argued October 6, 1947;
decided October 17, 1947.
Charles E. Murphy, Corporation Counsel (Seymour B. Quel and Helen R. Cassidy of counsel), for appellants.
Albert T. Scharps for respondent.

Opinion:
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Loughban, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye and Fuld, JJ.; Thacheb, J., dissents in the following memorandum: I am constrained to dissent. During the period in question all salaries and expenses of the Transit Commission except the salaries of its commissioners, secretary and counsel were subjected to the budget-making powers and procedure of the city, and were required to be audited and to be paid in the same manner as are the expenses of an agency of the city, as prescribed in the charter thereof (L. 1940, ch. 246). The earlier enactments (L. 1937, ch. 859 and L. 1939, ch. 955) could not impair the powers subsequently granted.