Case Name: William Matthew LAMPLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1987-03-26
Citations: 506 So. 2d 12
Docket Number: No. 85-1902
Parties: William Matthew LAMPLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: UPCHURCH, C.J., and SHARP, J., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 506
Pages: 12–13

Head Matter:
William Matthew LAMPLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 85-1902.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
March 26, 1987.
Rehearing Denied April 28, 1987.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Brynn Newton, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Sean Daly, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
COBB, Judge.
This is an appeal from a sentence which was excessive because of an improper departure from the guidelines. See Whitehead v. State, 498 So.2d 863 (Fla.1986). Although the appellant has served the in-carcerative portion of his split sentence, the issue is still viable because of the length of the probationary period. Cf Crews v. State, 502 So.2d 1360 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987).
REVERSED and REMANDED for entry of a corrected sentence in conformity with the guidelines.
UPCHURCH, C.J., and SHARP, J., concur.