Case Name: Chantale Teta MAFFO, Petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-10-03
Citations: 669 F. App'x 114
Docket Number: No. 16-1153
Parties: Chantale Teta MAFFO, Petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 669
Pages: 114–115

Head Matter:
Chantale Teta MAFFO, Petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 16-1153
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: September 29, 2016
Decided: October 3, 2016
Godwill C. Tachi, THE TACHI LAW FIRM, LLC, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Petitioner, Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy, Shelley R. Goad, Assistant Director, Julia J. Tyler, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Chántale Teta Maffo, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her motion to reopen as untimely and numerically barred. We have reviewed the administrative' record and Maffo's claims, and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying her motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2016); Mosere v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 397, 400 (4th Cir. 2009). We accordingly deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re Maffo (B.I.A. Jan. 19, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED