Case Name: W. S. Spencer, Treasurer of the City of Guthrie, v. W. H. Gray, Receiver of the National Bank of Guthrie
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1897-01
Citations: 5 Okla. 216
Docket Number: 
Parties: W. S. Spencer, Treasurer of the City of Guthrie, v. W. H. Gray, Receiver of the National Bank of Guthrie.
Judges: Dale, C. J., having presided in the court below, not sitting; all the other Justices concurring.
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 5
Pages: 216–217

Head Matter:
W. S. Spencer, Treasurer of the City of Guthrie, v. W. H. Gray, Receiver of the National Bank of Guthrie.
The decision of the court below is reversed and this cause remanded for the reason announced in the case of Robert Martin, Mayor, et al. v. The Territory of Oklahoma ex rel. W. H. Gray, decided at this term.
Error from the District Court of Logan County.
Bayard T. Mainer, for plaintiff in error.
John F. Stone and Herod, Widmer & Overstreet, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Tarsney, J.:
This is a proceeding in mandamus on the relation of W. H. Gray, receiver of the National Bank of Guthrie, to' require the respondent, W. S. Spencer, treasurer of the city of Guthrie, to pay over to said receiver certain moneys, the proceeds of taxes levied by said city of Guthrie for the payment of certain warrants, issued by said city, in settlement of certain liabilities of the provisional governments of Guthrie, East Guthrie, Capitol Hill and the consolidated school districts composed, of Guthrie, East Guthrie, West Guthrie and Capitol Hill. The conditions relating to the issue of said warrants and to the levy and collection of said taxes, are the same as those considered in the case of Robert Martin, Mayor, et al. v. The Territory of Oklahoma ex rel. W. H. Gray, decided by this court at this term (p. 188, this volume). The facts being substantially the same in each case, and the questions of law arising upon the records in both cases being identical, the conclusion of the court in that case must govern as to this.
The judgment of the court below, in this cause, is reversed and the case remanded to the court below, with instructions to proceed in accordance with the views expressed in the opinion in the other case.
Dale, C. J., having presided in the court below, not sitting; all the other Justices concurring.