Case Name: Samuel SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1999-08-27
Citations: 741 So. 2d 585
Docket Number: No. 99-1965
Parties: Samuel SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: DAUKSCH, HARRIS and PETERSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 741
Pages: 585–585

Head Matter:
Samuel SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 99-1965.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Aug. 27, 1999.
Rehearing Denied Oct. 4, 1999.
Samuel Smith, Mayo, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm this successive appeal from a denial of a motion to correct a sentence. Because appellant has engaged in frivolous and successive appeals we warn him that if he files another appeal regarding the same issue and conviction that he will be subject to a cancellation of good time credits and other sanctions. See Isley v. State, 652 So.2d 409 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Wareham v. State, 678 So.2d 432 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. den., 686 So.2d 583 (Fla.1996).
AFFIRMED.
DAUKSCH, HARRIS and PETERSON, JJ., concur.