Case Name: Dasha RILEY, an individual, Defendant-Cross-claimant-Appellant, v. State of CALIFORNIA, People of California, Plaintiff-Cross-defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-02-22
Citations: 4 F. App'x 480
Docket Number: No. 99-55532; D.C. No. CV-99-00118-JTM/JAH
Parties: Dasha RILEY, an individual, Defendant-Cross-claimant-Appellant, v. State of CALIFORNIA, People of California, Plaintiff-Cross-defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before LEAVY, THOMAS and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 4
Pages: 480–480

Head Matter:
Dasha RILEY, an individual, Defendant-Cross-claimant-Appellant, v. State of CALIFORNIA, People of California, Plaintiff-Cross-defendant-Appellee.
No. 99-55532.
D.C. No. CV-99-00118-JTM/JAH.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 12, 2001.
Decided Feb. 22, 2001.
Before LEAVY, THOMAS and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Dasha Riley appeals pro se the district court's order remanding her action to state court under 28 U.S.C. § 1446(c)(4) after Riley, sought to remove a pending criminal case from the Municipal Court of California involving a charge of driving a vehicle while intoxicated. We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's order filed February 3,1999.
AFFIRMED.
. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.