Case Name: In the Matter of the Application of the Mortgage Commission of the State of New York for an Order Directing Muller Paper Goods Co., Inc., to Make Available all Records and Data with Respect to Income, and for an Order Directing the Payment of Surplus or Such Part Thereof as the Court May Determine to the Mortgagee, the Mortgage Commission of the State of New York, etc. Mortgage Commission of the State of New York, Appellant; Muller Paper Goods Co., Inc., Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1939-05-08
Citations: 257 A.D. 834
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Application of the Mortgage Commission of the State of New York for an Order Directing Muller Paper Goods Co., Inc., to Make Available all Records and Data with Respect to Income, and for an Order Directing the Payment of Surplus or Such Part Thereof as the Court May Determine to the Mortgagee, the Mortgage Commission of the State of New York, etc. Mortgage Commission of the State of New York, Appellant; Muller Paper Goods Co., Inc., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 257
Pages: 834–834

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Application of the Mortgage Commission of the State of New York for an Order Directing Muller Paper Goods Co., Inc., to Make Available all Records and Data with Respect to Income, and for an Order Directing the Payment of Surplus or Such Part Thereof as the Court May Determine to the Mortgagee, the Mortgage Commission of the State of New York, etc. Mortgage Commission of the State of New York, Appellant; Muller Paper Goods Co., Inc., Respondent.

Opinion:
The motion is referred to the court that rendered the decision on the prior motion. [See 256 App. Div. 301; Id. 1081.] Present — Lazansky, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ. Motion for reargument of motion granted, and on reargument motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted and the following question certified: In this proceeding, in ascertaining if surplus was produced pursuant to section 1077-c, Civ. Prae. Act, was it proper for the Special Term to refuse to include, as an item tending to produce surplus, the reasonable value of the use and occupation of that part of the mortgaged property occupied by the owner in the conduct of its manufacturing business? Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ.