Case Name: Andrew Warren et al., Respondents, v. State of New York, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2000-07-17
Citations: 274 A.D.2d 471
Docket Number: Claim No. 84086
Parties: Andrew Warren et al., Respondents, v State of New York, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 274
Pages: 471–472

Head Matter:
Andrew Warren et al., Respondents, v State of New York, Appellant.
(Claim No. 84086.)
[711 NYS2d 911]

Opinion:
—In a claim to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., based on negligence and violations of Labor Law § 200, 240 (1), and § 241 (6), the defendant appeals (1), as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Court of Claims (Nadel, J.), entered February 2, 1998, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the claim and granted that branch of the claimants' cross motion which was for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability on the cause of action based on a violation of Labor Law § 240 (1) and on the corresponding derivative claim, and (2) from an interlocutory judgment of the same court dated February 9, 1998, which is in favor of the claimants and against it on the issue of liability on the cause of action based on a violation of Labor Law § 240 (1) and the corresponding derivative claim.
Ordered that the appeals are dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
The appeals from the order and interlocutory judgment must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see, Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on appeal from the order and the interlocutory judgment are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the final judgment (see, CPLR 5501 [a] [1]; Warren v State of New York, 274 AD2d 472 [decided herewith]). Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Altman and Krausman, JJ., concur.