Case Name: Apag, Inc. v. United Stated
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1967-03-13
Citations: 58 Cust. Ct. 163
Docket Number: C.D. 2918
Parties: Apag, Inc. v. United Stated
Judges: Before Kao and Ford, Judges
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Volume: 58
Pages: 163–163

Head Matter:
(C.D. 2918)
Apag, Inc. v. United Stated
United States Customs Court, Second Division
(Decided March 13, 1967)
Plaintiff not represented by counsel.
Barefoot Sanders, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.
Before Kao and Ford, Judges

Opinion:
Ford, Judge:
When the suit listed above was called, there was no appearance by plaintiff either in person or by attorney. A motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution was made on behalf of the defendant.
An examination of the official papers indicates that the protest was not filed within the time prescribed by section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Accordingly, motion made on behalf of defendant is denied and the protest is dismissed as being untimely.
Judgment will be rendered accordingly.