Case Name: David Ryder v. Joseph T. Sisson and another
Court: Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Jurisdiction: Rhode Island
Decision Date: 1862-09
Citations: 7 R.I. 341
Docket Number: 
Parties: David Ryder v. Joseph T. Sisson and another.
Judges: 
Reporter: Rhode Island Reports
Volume: 7
Pages: 341–345

Head Matter:
David Ryder v. Joseph T. Sisson and another.
A trustee under a will, authorized to invest the trust property in real estate, stocks and securities, is not warranted in investing the same, with the consent of the cestui que trust who has a life interest only in the trust estate, in cotton machinery, for the purpose of enabling the cestui to do business as a cotton manufacturer.
If machinery so purchased is, by the trustee and cestui, mortgaged to indemnify an endorser for, and creditor of, the cestui, the breach of trust committed in the acquiring of the property cannot be set up, by the mortgagors, in replevin, to' defend against the right to possess it vested by the mortgage in the mortgagee.
To the extent of a cestui que trusts interest in trust property, the application of it by him to the security and payment of his debts is precisely the application which a court of equity most approves, and most willingly aids to enforce.
Replevin for certain cotton machinery, which was used by Amasa W. Whipple, in the Robin Hollow Mill, so called, in Cumberland. The case was submitted to the court by agreement, — a jury trial having been waived, — and proved to be a contest for the machinery replevied, between the plaintiff, who claimed under several mortgages of the same executed to him' by ■ the said Amasa W. Whipple, and Joseph T. Sisson, and the latter, who claimed to hold the same as'trustee for said Amasa, of the machinery and of other property, under the will of Abigail Whipple, the mother of said Amasa. At the trial, it appeaied, that Abigail Whipple, by her will, placed a considerable real and personal estate in trust, for her sons one Nathaniel C. Dana succeeding in the trust the original trustee, J ohn B. Read, and the defendant, Joseph T. Sisson, succeeding in the trust the said Nathaniel C. Dana. .The following extract from the will of said Abigail was agreed to embrace all of her will which bore upon the nature of'the trust, and the powers and duties of the trustee:
“I give, devise and bequeath to John B. Read, of Pawtucket, his heirs, executors, administrators and assigns, the farm on which I now live, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof; it being the same estate devised by my father, Elisha Waterman, to the said Richard Carrique, junior, in trust for me — by the name of the Homestead Farm; and also one undivided half part of all my other estate, real and personal,, of which I have the disposition and power of appointment, and which is not specifically herein devised and bequeathed: to have and to hold the- same, with all the rights, privileges and appurtenances thereto belonging, to him, the said John B. Read, his heirs, executors, administrators and assigns, for, and during the natural life of my son, Amasa W. Whipple, upon trust; that he, the said J ohn B. Read, shall collect the rents, issues, ■ profits, interest, dividends and annual produce of all said trust-property and estate, and after paying out the same, the necessary expenses of managing and improving the same and of keeping the same in repair, and the taxes and insurance upon the same, he shall pay over to my said son, Amasa W. Whipple, at least once in every year, the nett annual produce of all said real and personal estate ; provided, however, that the said trustee may permit the said Amasa to use, occupy and possess the said Homestead Farm, or other real estate, without being subject to the payment of any rent therefor.
“ And upon the decease of my said son, the said trustee shall convey all said trust-property and estate to the children of said Amasa, who may be living at the time of his decease, and to the issue of any deceased child or children, in equal shares,' — the issue of any deceased child taking the share of the parent; and upon such conveyance, which said trustee shall so make as to vest in the grantées therein a full- and absolute estate in fee simple, in all said property ancKestate, thig trust shall be ended.
“And for the better management and improvement of the estate and property herein and hereby devis.ed in trust, the said trustees severally shall have power, and they are hereby severally authorized and empowered, in the execution of their respective trusts, to lease the whole, ot? any portion of said real estate, for such period, and upon such terms, as the trustees may think proper; to make partition of any estate of which each may be seized in common with the others, or with any other person or persons, and to make and execute valid deeds of partition thereof; and with the assent, in writing, of the beneficiary of the trust, to make sale of any portion of the trust-estate and property held by each trustee, in his discretion, and upon such sale to execute good and valid conveyances of the same, to the purchaser thereof; and upon receipt of the purchase money therefor, to invest the same in other productive real estate, stocks, or securities, and to stand seized of such investments upon the same trusts, and for the same purposes, and for the same periods, and to dispose of the same at the decease of the beneficiary, in like manner as the said trustee stands seized of the property and estate devised to him -by this will; and each trustee may, with the like assent in writing of his beneficiary, alter and vary the investments so made, which investments shall always be made in the name of the trustee.”
It further appeared, that Dana, whilst he was the trustee under said will, and that Sisson, whilst he was trustee, had, with the assent in writing of Amasa W. Whipple, made several changes in the investment of the trust-property, both real and personal, by which the interest of the' trust-estate in the Eobin Hollow privilege had been increased 'from an undivided eighth to the whole of said privilege, a mill had been built thereon, and cotton machinery purchased for, and put into the same, for the purpose of establishing said Amasa inlmsiness, as a cotton manufacturer. It also appeared, that to furnjsh him with credit to carry on his said business, the plaintiff had endorsed paper and incurred liabilities for his accommodation, taking as his indemnity therefor, mortgages of both mill and machinery, from both the trustee, Dana, and the trustee, Sisson, in which the said Amasa did not join, and of the machinery for which the suit was brought, executed by the trustee, Sisson, and the said Amasa W. Whipple.
Payne, for the plaintiff.
Gerald, for the defendants.

Opinion:
Ames, C. J.
We can perceive no plausible ground upon which the title of the plaintiff to this cotton machinery, under his mortgages, can be resisted. All of them are executed by the trustee under the will, for the time being, and some of them, both by the trustee, and Amasa W. Whipple, the cestui que trust. The legal title to the property is certainly vested, by these deeds, in the plaintiff; and we are in ho condition, in this action of replevin, to decide upon the respective equities of those entitled under the trust. It passes our wisdom to see, how either Whipple, or the trustee under the will of Mrs. Whipple, can, in this action, resist the right of the plaintiff to the possession of personal property, the title to which, in mortgage, is vested in him under their own hands and seals. But, if we look beneath this, this machinery cannot be claimed to be an investment of the trust-property authorized by the will of Mrs. Whipple; for it is neither real estate, stoclcs, or securities, the kinds of property to which the will expressly limits investments .of the trust-estate. The proceeds of the trust-property, may, in equity, at a proper time, in a proper manner, and by proper ¡parties, be followed into it, and, for aught that we can see, the trustees be made accountable to the cestuis who come after Amasa W. Whipple, for a misapplication of the trust funds; but how can the trustee and Whipple, who have joined in this misapplication, set up the breach of trust in acquiring this property, against the title to it which they had given, for value, to this, for aught that we know, innocent plaintiff? Indeed, to the extent of his beneficial interest in it, if it could be regarded as trust-property under his mother's will, the application of it by Amasa W. "V^hipple to the payment of his just debts is precisely the disposition of it which a court of equity would most approve, and most willingly aid to enforce. Tillinghast v. Bradford and another, 5 R. I. Rep. 205.
Let judgment be entered, that at tbe date of tbe writ of replevin tbe title to tbe goods and chattels named therein was in the plaintiff, and for six cents damages, and costs.