Case Name: The State, ex rel. Halliday, Admr., v. Court of Appeals of Eighth Judicial District et al.
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1938-07-13
Citations: 134 Ohio St. 191
Docket Number: No. 27010
Parties: The State, ex rel. Halliday, Admr., v. Court of Appeals of Eighth Judicial District et al.
Judges: Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Day, Zimmerman, Myers and Gorman, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, New Service
Volume: 134
Pages: 191–192

Head Matter:
The State, ex rel. Halliday, Admr., v. Court of Appeals of Eighth Judicial District et al.
(No. 27010
Decided July 13, 1938.)
Mr. William, T. Arnos, Mr. James B. RuM and Mr. R. W. HaUiday, for relator.'
Mr. Herbert S. Duffy, attorney general, Mr. Eugene 8. Lindemann and Messrs. Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, for respondents.

Opinion:
By the Court.
On March 30, 1938, the relator filed in this court a petition to prohibit the Court of Appeals of the Eighth Appellate District and a receiver appointed in a foreclosure proceeding, from acting further in three cases which were pending in that court on appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga county.
An answer filed in the prohibition proceeding in this court pleads among other allegations, that the relator has an adequate remedy by appeal from the judgments of the Court of Appeals in those cases, and a supplemental answer pleads that the relator prosecuted appeals to this court which sustained motions to dismiss the appeals as of right and overruled motions to certify the records on May 18,1938.
The respondents moved to dismiss the petition for a writ of prohibition.
The relator had an adequate remedy by appeal and he availed himself of that remedy in all three cases.
The motion to dismiss is sustained, and the petition for a writ of prohibition is dismissed.
Petition dismissed.
Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Day, Zimmerman, Myers and Gorman, JJ., concur.
Williams, J., not participating.