Case Name: Phillip RUTH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-08-01
Citations: 202 S.W.3d 638
Docket Number: No. WD 65371
Parties: Phillip RUTH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before SMART, P.J., ULRICH and HARDWICK, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 202
Pages: 638–638

Head Matter:
Phillip RUTH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 65371.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Aug. 1, 2006.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Sept. 26, 2006.
Application for Transfer Denied Oct. 31, 2006.
Phillip Anthony Ruth, Bowling Green, MO, pro se.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before SMART, P.J., ULRICH and HARDWICK, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Phillip Ruth appeals from a judgment denying his Rule 74.06 motion to re-open post-conviction proceedings. Because Ruth's motion failed to state a proper claim for relief under Rule 74.06, we affirm the motion court's judgment.
No precedential purpose would be served by a published opinion, however, we have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision. AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).