Case Name: Bryan O'Neal BAKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2005-05-12
Citations: 902 So. 2d 222
Docket Number: No. 1D01-2839
Parties: Bryan O’Neal BAKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: KAHN, WEBSTER and HAWKES, JJ„ Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 902
Pages: 222–223

Head Matter:
Bryan O’Neal BAKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D01-2839.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
May 12, 2005.
Appellant, pro se.
Charlie Crist, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
On The Court's Own Motion
We sua sponte withdraw our pre-man-date opinion in this case and substitute the following.
PER CURIAM.
The summary denial of the appellant's postconvietion motion is reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court to permit the appellant a reasonable opportunity to demonstrate his claim is timely under Dickey v. State, 30 Fla. L. Weekly D443, — So.2d-, 2005 WL 350313 (Fla. 1st DCA Feb.15, 2005), by alleging the date his present conviction was enhanced by the challenged conviction. Cf. Nelson v. State, 875 So.2d 579 (Fla.2004). If no amendment is filed within the time allowed, then the denial can be with prejudice. Id;. Spooner v. State, 889 So.2d 900, 901 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
KAHN, WEBSTER and HAWKES, JJ" Concur.