Case Name: David Lee FRAZIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-04-19
Citations: 578 So. 2d 51
Docket Number: No. 90-00055
Parties: David Lee FRAZIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SCHOONOVER, C.J., and LEHAN and DANAHY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 578
Pages: 51–52

Head Matter:
David Lee FRAZIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 90-00055.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
April 19, 1991.
Christine M. Beck, Asst. County Atty., Tampa, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Ivy R. Ginsberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellant was convicted of robbery and appeals his conviction contending that there was insufficient evidence of the element of using "force, violence or assault or putting in fear." § 812.13(1), Fla.Stat. (1989). The appellee concedes the error. Therefore, we reverse the appellant's conviction and sentence for robbery and, in accordance with section 924.34, Florida Statutes, remand with directions to the trial court to adjudicate the appellant guilty of the necessarily lesser included crime of petit theft and to resentence the appellant accordingly.
SCHOONOVER, C.J., and LEHAN and DANAHY, JJ., concur.