Case Name: Makda Fessehaie TECLEZGHI, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent; Makda Fessehaie Teclezghi, Petitioner, v. Eric H. Holder Jr., Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-01-04
Citations: 628 F.3d 1055
Docket Number: Nos. 07-70661, 07-71463
Parties: Makda Fessehaie TECLEZGHI, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. Makda Fessehaie Teclezghi, Petitioner, v. Eric H. Holder Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: BETTY B. FLETCHER and ANDREW J. KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges, and KEVIN THOMAS DUFFY, Senior District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 628
Pages: 1055–1059

Head Matter:
Makda Fessehaie TECLEZGHI, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. Makda Fessehaie Teclezghi, Petitioner, v. Eric H. Holder Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
Nos. 07-70661, 07-71463.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Jan. 4, 2011.
Holly Stafford Cooper, Esquire, Amagda Perez, UC Davis Law School Immigration Law Clinic, Davis, CA, for Petitioner.
Richard M. Evans, Esquire, Joan Estelle Smiley, Esquire, Sunah Lee, Virginia Lum, Margaret Anne O’Donnell, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
Agency No. [ AXXX-XXX-XXX ].
Before: BETTY B. FLETCHER and ANDREW J. KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges, and KEVIN THOMAS DUFFY, Senior District Judge.
The Honorable Kevin Thomas Duffy, Senior United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
Order; Dissent by Judge PREGERSON.
ORDER
Judges Kleinfeld and Duffy voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Judge Fletcher voted to grant the petition for rehearing. Judges Kleinfeld and Duffy recommend denying the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Fletcher recommends granting the petition for rehearing en banc.
The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and a judge of the court requested a vote on whether to rehear the case en banc. The en banc call failed to receive a majority of votes by active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
The petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED.