Case Name: Jan STEPHENSON, Appellant, v. MIAMI HEAT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and Ambassador Events Corporation, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1998-04-01
Citations: 707 So. 2d 428
Docket Number: Nos. 96-3138, 96-2616
Parties: Jan STEPHENSON, Appellant, v. MIAMI HEAT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and Ambassador Events Corporation, Appellees.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and GREEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 707
Pages: 428–429

Head Matter:
Jan STEPHENSON, Appellant, v. MIAMI HEAT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and Ambassador Events Corporation, Appellees.
Nos. 96-3138, 96-2616.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 1, 1998.
Davis, Scott, Weber & Edwards and Thomas E. Scott, Miami, and Frank Zaeherl, Miami; Levine & Finger and David J. Finger, Miami, for appellant.
Angones, . Hunter, McClure, Lynch & Williams and Christopher J. Lynch, Miami; Ponzoli, Wassenberg & Sperkacz and Zorian Sperkacz and Ronald P. Ponzoli, . Miami, for appellees.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and GREEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Because the record presents genuine issues of material fact concerning the liability of both the Miami Heat Limited Partnership, e.g., McCain v. Florida Power Corp., 593 So.2d 500 (Fla.1992); Wakefield v. Winter Haven Management, Inc., 685 So.2d 1348 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Johnson v. Howard Mark Productions, Inc., 608 So.2d 937 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Holiday Inns, Inc. v. Shelburne, 576 So.2d 322 (Fla. 4th DCA), dismissed, 589 So.2d 291 (Fla.1991), and Ambassador Events Corporation, e.g., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. McDonald, 676 So.2d 12 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996), approved sub nom. Merrill Crossings Assocs. v. McDonald, 705 So.2d 560 (Fla.1997); Regency Lake Apartments Assocs. v. French, 590 So.2d 970 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Bovis v. 7-Eleven, Inc., 505 So.2d 661 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987); Arias v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 426 So.2d 1136 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); see generally Garcia v. State, Dep't of Natural Resources, 707 So.2d 1158 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)[23 FLW D569], the summary judgments in their favor are reversed for trial.