Case Name: Henschel v. Harlem Reporter Co. et al.
Court: New York Superior Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1893-01
Citations: 2 Misc. 572
Docket Number: 
Parties: Henschel v. Harlem Reporter Co. et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 2
Pages: 572–572

Head Matter:
NEW YORK SUPERIOR COURT
GENERAL TERM,
JANUARY, 1893.
Henschel v. Harlem Reporter Co. et al.
William G. Me Crea, for plaintiff (respondent).
Charles W. Dayton, for defendant (appellant).

Opinion:
Dttgeo, J.
A careful examination of the papers fails to show any improper exercise of discretion by the court at Special Term. The original complaint sufficed for one kind of relief. The supplemental complaint is but for more extensive relief. Latham v. Richards, 15 Hun, 129.
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs.
Sedgwick, Oh. J., and Gtldeksleeve, J., concur.
Order affirmed.