Case Name: Portchester Iron Works, Inc., Respondent, v. Mario Di Gregorio, Inc., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1973-07-02
Citations: 42 A.D.2d 715
Docket Number: 
Parties: Portchester Iron Works, Inc., Respondent, v. Mario Di Gregorio, Inc., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 42
Pages: 715–716

Head Matter:
Portchester Iron Works, Inc., Respondent, v. Mario Di Gregorio, Inc., Appellant.

Opinion:
In an action to recover a balance due for work, labor and services performed and materials furnished, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered October 20, 1972, which denied its motion .to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd. [a]). (The motion was treated by Special Term as one for summary judgment.) Order affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. Defendant's time to serve its answer to the complaint is extended until 20 days after entry of the order to be made hereon. We are not, of course, passing, on the merits of appellant's defense but are merely determining that plaintiff's papers raise an issue of fact as to whether there was, as a matter of law, an accord and satisfaction. Rabin, P. J., Hopkins, Munder, Martuscello and Shapiro, JJ., concur.