Case Name: ARTHUR DARRAH v. STATE
Court: Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1917-03-27
Citations: 13 Okla. Crim. 246
Docket Number: No. A-2724
Parties: ARTHUR DARRAH v. STATE.
Judges: ARMSTRONG and BRETT, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Oklahoma Criminal Reports
Volume: 13
Pages: 246–247

Head Matter:
ARTHUR DARRAH v. STATE.
No. A-2724.
Opinion Filed March 27, 1917.
(163 Pac. 720.)
APPEAL AND ERROR — Briefs and Argument — Affirmance. Where an appeal from a judgment of conviction is taken to this court and no briefs are filed or argument presented, this court will examine the record, and, if no error is apparent, the judgment will be affirmed.
Appeal from County Court, Canadian County; R. B. Forrest, Judge.
Arthur Darrah was convicted of a violation of the prohibitory law, and he brings error.
Affirmed.
W. A. Maurer, for plaintiff , in error.
R. McMillan, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Opinion:
DOYLE, P. J.
The plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Ganadian county upon an indict-, ment presented by the grand jury in the district court, which was duly transferred from the district cou'rt to said county court, charging the plaintiff in error with having unlawfully sold whisky to one D. T. Jones, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury he was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for four months and to pay a fine of .$300. From the judgment he ap- pealed by filing in this court on April 29, 1916, a petition in error with case-made.
On the call of the case for final submission, the Attorney General moved to affirm the judgment for the reason that no brief has been filed and no appearance made for the plaintiff in error in this court.
We have examined the record, and find that the indictment is sufficient, that the instructions of the court fairly and fully present the law of the case, and that the verdict was well supported by the evidence. Finding no error in the record, the judgment is affirmed.
ARMSTRONG and BRETT, JJ., concur.