Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Henry SAUNDERS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-06-14
Citations: 234 F. App'x 611
Docket Number: No. 06-10421
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Henry SAUNDERS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 234
Pages: 611–612

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Henry SAUNDERS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-10421.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 5, 2007.
Filed June 14, 2007.
Joseph Welty, AUSA, USPX—Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Nancy L. Hinchcliffe, Esq., Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: LEAVY, RYMER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Henry Saunders appeals from the 135-month sentence imposed following remand under United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1085 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Saunders has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se or government brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 88-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on direct appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment and grant counsel's motion to withdraw.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.