Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Robert O. BAILEY, Appellant; Robert O. BAILEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-10-31
Citations: 908 S.W.2d 381
Docket Number: Nos. 66514, 68237
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Robert O. BAILEY, Appellant. Robert O. BAILEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before SMITH, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and RHODES, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 908
Pages: 381–381

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Robert O. BAILEY, Appellant. Robert O. BAILEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 66514, 68237.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Oct. 31, 1995.
Emmett D. Queener, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Aundreia R. Alexander, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before SMITH, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and RHODES, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
In this consolidated action, Defendant appeals from his conviction of second degree burglary and stealing, and from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm.
An extended opinion would serve no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b).