Case Name: In the Matter of Mahamadou H., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2012-10-11
Citations: 99 A.D.3d 528
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Mahamadou H., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 99
Pages: 528–528

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Mahamadou H., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.
[951 NYS2d 868]

Opinion:
The court's finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court's determinations concerning identification and credibility, including its finding that the victim had a sufficient opportunity to observe appellant and make a reliable identification. Concur — Andrias, J.E, Friedman, Moskowitz, Freedman and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.