Case Name: David William CONN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth E. STOLLE, Sheriff; Thompson, Captain; Bishop, Sergeant; Apfel, Corporal; Jail Staff; Gleason, Deputy Sheriff; Free, Colonel; Schuster, Chief, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-01-05
Citations: 460 F. App'x 276
Docket Number: No. 11-7099
Parties: David William CONN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth E. STOLLE, Sheriff; Thompson, Captain; Bishop, Sergeant; Apfel, Corporal; Jail Staff; Gleason, Deputy Sheriff; Free, Colonel; Schuster, Chief, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 460
Pages: 276–276

Head Matter:
David William CONN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth E. STOLLE, Sheriff; Thompson, Captain; Bishop, Sergeant; Apfel, Corporal; Jail Staff; Gleason, Deputy Sheriff; Free, Colonel; Schuster, Chief, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 11-7099.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 6, 2011.
Decided: Jan. 5, 2012.
David William Conn, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding px-ecedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
David William Conn appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Conn v. Stolle, Case No. 1:11-cv-00758-CMH-TCB, 2011 WL 3321136 (E.D.Va. Aug. 2, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and ai-gument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.