Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesus ROJO-LOIZA, aka Jesus Loreto-Rojo, Chuey Rojas, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-12-10
Citations: 114 F. App'x 907
Docket Number: No. 03-10428; D.C. No. CR-02-00325-FJM
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jesus ROJO-LOIZA, aka Jesus Loreto-Rojo, Chuey Rojas, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before GOODWIN, WALLACE and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 114
Pages: 907–908

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jesus ROJO-LOIZA, aka Jesus Loreto-Rojo, Chuey Rojas, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 03-10428.
D.C. No. CR-02-00325-FJM.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 6, 2004.
Decided Dec. 10, 2004.
Andrew Pacheco, United States Attorney, Michael T. Morrissey, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Jesus Rojo-Loiza, Florence, AZ, pro se.
Alex Gonzalez, Gonzalez & Smith, Mesa, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before GOODWIN, WALLACE and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Jesus Rojo-Loiza appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 87-month sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine base and cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, 841(a)(1), 841(b)(l)(A)(iii), 841(b)(l)(B)(ii).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Rojo-Loiza has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Rojo-Loiza has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.