Case Name: FREDERIC L. HULME, APPELLANT, v. FREDERICK W. DONNELLY ET AL., BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF TRENTON, RESPONDENTS
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1921-02-28
Citations: 95 N.J.L. 545
Docket Number: 
Parties: FREDERIC L. HULME, APPELLANT, v. FREDERICK W. DONNELLY ET AL., BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF TRENTON, RESPONDENTS.
Judges: For affirmance — The ChaNCedloR, Chief Justioe, TREXCirARD, PARKER, BERGEN, MlNTÜRN, KaDISCIÍ, KaT-zeNBACU, White, HeppüNTIeimer, WilliaMS, Taylor, GARDNER, AOKBRSON, JJ. 14.
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 95
Pages: 545–545

Head Matter:
FREDERIC L. HULME, APPELLANT, v. FREDERICK W. DONNELLY ET AL., BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF TRENTON, RESPONDENTS.
Submitted December 6, 1920
Decided February 28, 1921.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 95 N. J. L. 30.
For the appellant, Charles E. Bird.
For the respondents, Ilenry M. Hartman.

Opinion:
Per Cueiajvl
The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Swayze in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The ChaNCedloR, Chief Justioe, TREXCirARD, PARKER, BERGEN, MlNTÜRN, KaDISCIÍ, KaT-zeNBACU, White, HeppüNTIeimer, WilliaMS, Taylor, GARDNER, AOKBRSON, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.