Case Name: FORTUNA DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION, Appellant, v. THE UNIVISION NETWORK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2004-10-06
Citations: 884 So. 2d 454
Docket Number: No. 3D03-2983
Parties: FORTUNA DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION, Appellant, v. THE UNIVISION NETWORK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Appellee.
Judges: Before LEVY, GERSTEN, and FLETCHER, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 884
Pages: 454–455

Head Matter:
FORTUNA DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION, Appellant, v. THE UNIVISION NETWORK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Appellee.
No. 3D03-2983.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 6, 2004.
Aballi Milne Kalil Escagedo, P.A., Miami, and Hendrik G. Milne and Carlos F. Osorio, for appellant.
Holland Knight LLP, and Lucinda A. Hofmann, and James D. Wing, Miami, for appellee.
Before LEVY, GERSTEN, and FLETCHER, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Fortuna Distribution Corporation appeals the .trial court's dismissal of its suit for declaratory relief due to lack of jurisdiction. We reverse.
The trial court's determination that it lacked jurisdiction is plainly error. There are multiple ripe issues that squarely fall under the declaratory judgment act, Section 86.011, Florida Statutes (2003). See Santa Rosa County v. Admin. Comm'n Div. of Admin. Hearings, 661 So.2d 1190 (Fla.1995). Accordingly, we reverse and remand.
Reversed and remanded.