Case Name: CLOSTER DAIRY FARMS, RESPONDENT, v. NEW YORK CENTRAL AND HUDSON RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1916-11-20
Citations: 89 N.J.L. 709
Docket Number: 
Parties: CLOSTER DAIRY FARMS, RESPONDENT, v. NEW YORK CENTRAL AND HUDSON RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 89
Pages: 709–710

Head Matter:
CLOSTER DAIRY FARMS, RESPONDENT, v. NEW YORK CENTRAL AND HUDSON RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT.
Argued July 5, 1916
Decided November 20, 1916.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 88 N. J. L. 557.
For the plaintiff-respondent, Mark Townsend, Jr.
For the defendant-appellant, John A. Hartpence.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Minturn. The remark in the opinion, to the effect that the defendant's contentions required the court to "review the findings of fact" was, obviously, a mere slip, by which the somewhat technical word "review" was substituted for "examine," as appears from the words immediately succeeding.
. For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, White, Heppenheimer, Wil-. liams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 10.
For reversal—None.