Case Name: In the Matter of the Application of Arthur R. Surpluss, Petitioner, for Dissolution of His Marriage with Celetus Ellis Surpluss, Otherwise Known as Leeta Ellis Surpluss, Respondent, Pursuant to Section 7-a, Domestic Relations Law (as Amended in Effect Sept. 1, 1936). In the Matter of the Application of Celetus Ellis Surpluss, Otherwise Known as Leeta Ellis Surpluss, Petitioner, for an Order Vacating and Setting Aside the Order of Dissolution of the Marriage between Petitioner and the Above Named Arthur R. Surpluss, Dated November 1, 1937, Entered in the Above Entitled Proceeding November 3, 1937, and Which Order Became Final February 3, 1938. Arthur R. Surpluss, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1939-01-20
Citations: 256 A.D. 810
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Application of Arthur R. Surpluss, Petitioner, for Dissolution of His Marriage with Celetus Ellis Surpluss, Otherwise Known as Leeta Ellis Surpluss, Respondent, Pursuant to Section 7-a, Domestic Relations Law (as Amended in Effect Sept. 1, 1936). In the Matter of the Application of Celetus Ellis Surpluss, Otherwise Known as Leeta Ellis Surpluss, Petitioner, for an Order Vacating and Setting Aside the Order of Dissolution of the Marriage between Petitioner and the Above Named Arthur R. Surpluss, Dated November 1, 1937, Entered in the Above Entitled Proceeding November 3, 1937, and Which Order Became Final February 3; 1938. Arthur R. Surpluss, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 256
Pages: 810–810

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Application of Arthur R. Surpluss, Petitioner, for Dissolution of His Marriage with Celetus Ellis Surpluss, Otherwise Known as Leeta Ellis Surpluss, Respondent, Pursuant to Section 7-a, Domestic Relations Law (as Amended in Effect Sept. 1, 1936). In the Matter of the Application of Celetus Ellis Surpluss, Otherwise Known as Leeta Ellis Surpluss, Petitioner, for an Order Vacating and Setting Aside the Order of Dissolution of the Marriage between Petitioner and the Above Named Arthur R. Surpluss, Dated November 1, 1937, Entered in the Above Entitled Proceeding November 3, 1937, and Which Order Became Final February 3; 1938. Arthur R. Surpluss, Appellant.

Opinion:
Order unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., O'Malley, Townley, Giennon and Untermyer, JJ.