Case Name: Nathaniel BURKES, Claimant/Appellant, v. JOE FAZIO BAKERY, INC., Employer/Respondent, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2019-06-18
Citations: 577 S.W.3d 179
Docket Number: No. ED 107411
Parties: Nathaniel BURKES, Claimant/Appellant,
v.
JOE FAZIO BAKERY, INC., Employer/Respondent,
and
Division of Employment Security, Respondent.
Judges: Before Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Colleen Dolan, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 577
Pages: 179–179

Head Matter:
Nathaniel BURKES, Claimant/Appellant,
v.
JOE FAZIO BAKERY, INC., Employer/Respondent,
and
Division of Employment Security, Respondent.
No. ED 107411
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
Filed: June 18, 2019
Nathaniel Burkes, Appellant Acting Pro Se.
Joe Fazio Bakery, Inc., Respondent Acting Pro Se.
Todd A. Scott, Bart A. Matanic, 421 East Dunklin St., PO Box 59, Jefferson City, MO 65104, For Respondent DES.
Before Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Colleen Dolan, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Nathaniel Burkes ("Claimant") appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (the "Commission") affirming the dismissal of Claimant's case because Claimant's appeal to the Division of Employment Security Appeals Tribunal was untimely filed. Because we find the Commission's decision to be based on competent and substantial evidence, we affirm the Commission's decision.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).