Case Name: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. LARRY BALDWIN
Court: North Carolina Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 1971-12-15
Citations: 13 N.C. App. 257
Docket Number: No. 7122SC751
Parties: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. LARRY BALDWIN
Judges: Chief Judge Mallard and Judge Hedrick concur.
Reporter: North Carolina Court of Appeals Reports
Volume: 13
Pages: 257–258

Head Matter:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. LARRY BALDWIN
No. 7122SC751
(Filed 15 December 1971)
Appeal by defendant from Crissman, Judge, 24 May 1971 Session of Superior Court held in Iredell County.
This case was consolidated for trial with the case of State v. William Baldwin which is the subject of a separate appeal. (See opinion in case No. 7122SC752 by Chief Judge Mallard, filed this date.)
Defendant was charged in a bill of indictment, proper in form, with the armed robbery of Larry Shives and Lola Shives.
Evidence for the State tended to show that on 6 January 1971, at approximately 8:40 p.m., defendant and his brother, William Baldwin, entered a store being operated by Larry Shives. One of the men put a gun to Shives’ throat and threatened to kill him if he moved. The other one struck Shives in the head and rendered him unconscious. Shives’ wife, Lola Shives, who was also present, was beaten by defendants about her face, head and breast. Shives regained consciousness as he was being kicked in the ribs and at that time observed money being taken from his pocket. Approximately $3900 was taken from his person and two pistols were removed from his place of business.
Defendant, through his testimony and that of other witnesses, offered evidence tending to establish an alibi.
The jury returned a verdict of guilty and from judgment entered on the verdict defendant appealed.
Attorney General Morgan by Assistant Attorney General Cole for the State.
Pope, McMillan & Bender by William H. McMillan for defendant appellant.

Opinion:
GRAHAM, Judge.
We have searched the entire record. No error appears therein and we conclude that defendant had a fair trial free from prejudicial error. We hold his appeal to be frivolous.
No error.
Chief Judge Mallard and Judge Hedrick concur.