Case Name: Elizabeth Loubet v. Albert E. Loubet
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1967-06-08
Citations: 155 Conn. 695
Docket Number: 
Parties: Elizabeth Loubet v. Albert E. Loubet
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 155
Pages: 695–696

Head Matter:
Elizabeth Loubet v. Albert E. Loubet
King, C. J., Alcorn, House, Thim and Ryan, Js.
Argued June 6
decided June 8, 1967
Stephen N. Schaffer, with whom, on the brief, was Bichard S. Weinstein, for the appellant (defendant).
J. Bichard Fay, with whom, on the brief, was Kenneth Garfunkel, for the appellee (plaintiff).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The opposing affidavit of the defendant contained no recital of facts which would be admissible in evidence, nor was any documentary proof submitted to show that there was a genuine issue as to any material fact alleged in the complaint. Practice Book § 300, 303; Kasowitz v. Mutual Construction Co., 154 Conn. 607, 613, 228 A.2d 149; Rathkopf v. Pearson, 148 Conn. 260, 263, 170 A.2d 135.
There is no error.