Case Name: Stacey L. CURTIN, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. John M. CURTIN, Respondent/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2007-01-16
Citations: 211 S.W.3d 640
Docket Number: No. ED 87679
Parties: Stacey L. CURTIN, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. John M. CURTIN, Respondent/Appellant.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 211
Pages: 640–641

Head Matter:
Stacey L. CURTIN, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. John M. CURTIN, Respondent/Appellant.
No. ED 87679.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Jan. 16, 2007.
John M. Curtin, St. Louis, MO, pro se.
Joe Kuhl, St. Charles, MO, for respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
John M. Curtin ("father") appeals the judgment of the trial court awarding Stacey L. Curtin ("mother") attorney's fees. Father claims the award was against the weight of the evidence.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).