Case Name: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Shaw
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1984-12-31
Citations: 15 Ohio St. 3d 125
Docket Number: D.D. No. 84-37
Parties: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Shaw.
Judges: Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 15
Pages: 125–126

Head Matter:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Shaw.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Shaw (1984), 15 Ohio St. 3d 125.]
(D.D. No. 84-37
December 31, 1984.)
Mr. Angelo J. Gagliardo, disciplinary counsel, and Mr. Carl J. Corletzi, for relator.
Mr. Richard Cartwright, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
After a careful review of the evidence, this court finds that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(1), (3), (4) and (6), DR 7-101 (A)(3), and DR 9-102(A) and (B) of the Code of Professional Responsibility. Accordingly, we concur in the recommendation of the board of commissioners.
Therefore, it is the judgment of this court that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law.
Judgment accordingly.
Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.