Case Name: The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Ronald Pasco BEASLEY, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-02-13
Citations: 557 So. 2d 132
Docket Number: No. 89-1549
Parties: The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Ronald Pasco BEASLEY, Appellee.
Judges: Before HUBBART, COPE and GODERICH, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 557
Pages: 132–133

Head Matter:
The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Ronald Pasco BEASLEY, Appellee.
No. 89-1549.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 13, 1990.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Roberta G. Mandel, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Marti Rothenberg, Asst. Public Defender, for appellee.
Before HUBBART, COPE and GODERICH, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
While the departure order is inartfully drawn, the second and third reasons, read in light of the trial court's remarks at sentencing, were intended to mean, and are sustainable under, point five of State v. McMullen, 529 So.2d 821, 823 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). See also State v. Sachs, 526 So.2d 48, 50 (Fla.1988).
Affirmed.