Case Name: Daryl L. LAVENDER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2001-08-24
Citations: 791 So. 2d 1255
Docket Number: No. 5D00-1512
Parties: Daryl L. LAVENDER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: THOMPSON, C.J., COBB and PETERSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 791
Pages: 1255–1256

Head Matter:
Daryl L. LAVENDER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D00-1512.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Aug. 24, 2001.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Nancy Ryan, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robert E. Bodnar, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm on the authority of Westerheide v. State, 767 So.2d 637 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000), rev. granted, 786 So.2d 1192 (Fla.2001) and certify the same questions to be of great public importance:
1) DOES THE JIMMY RYCE ACT VIOLATE THE EX POST FACTO CLAUSES OF THE UNITED STATES AND FLORIDA CONSTITUTIONS?
2) DOES THE JIMMY RYCE ACT VIOLATE THE DOUBLE JEOPARDY CLAUSES OF THE UNTIED STATES AND FLORIDA CONSTITUTIONS?
3) DOES THE JIMMY RYCE ACT VIOLATE THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSES OF THE UNITED STATES AND FLORIDA CONSTITUTIONS?
4) DOES THE JIMMY RYCE ACT VIOLATE THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSES OF THE UNTIED STATES AND FLORIDA CONSTITUTIONS?
AFFIRMED; QUESTIONS CERTIFIED.
THOMPSON, C.J., COBB and PETERSON, JJ., concur.