Case Name: Cory Lamar WHITE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1987-01-29
Citations: 501 So. 2d 189
Docket Number: No. 86-117
Parties: Cory Lamar WHITE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ORFINGER, J., concurs.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 501
Pages: 189–190

Head Matter:
Cory Lamar WHITE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 86-117.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Jan. 29, 1987.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and James R. Wulchak, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Paula C. Coffman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
DAUKSCH, Judge.
This is an appeal from a conviction and sentence in a robbery case. While we can agree with appellant that it was harsh to treat him as an adult criminal rather than a juvenile delinquent, we are unable to rule that the trial judge abused his discretion in refusing to impose juvenile sanctions. However, with the exception of appellant's unscored juvenile record, the trial court's reasons for departure are invalid. Although the unscored juvenile record has been found to be a valid reason for departure, Weems v. State, 469 So.2d 128 (Fla.1985), we doubt that this factor, standing alone, will justify a departure in this case for two reasons. First, appellant's juvenile record is of a quite minimal nature; second, although the crime for which appellant was convicted is a serious one (robbery) the circumstances under which this crime was committed are not. Appellant's sentence remains within the trial court's discretion.
SENTENCE QUASHED; REMANDED.
ORFINGER, J., concurs.
COBB, J., concurs in result only.