Case Name: S. S. SILBERBLATT, INC. and The Sterling Company, Appellants, v. The RENEGOTIATION BOARD, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1970-05-05
Citations: 426 F.2d 290
Docket Number: No. 517, Docket 33613
Parties: S. S. SILBERBLATT, INC. and The Sterling Company, Appellants, v. The RENEGOTIATION BOARD, Appellee.
Judges: Before MOORE and SMITH, Circuit Judges, and WEINFELD, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 426
Pages: 290–291

Head Matter:
S. S. SILBERBLATT, INC. and The Sterling Company, Appellants, v. The RENEGOTIATION BOARD, Appellee.
No. 517, Docket 33613.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued April 20, 1970.
Decided May 5, 1970.
Charles H. Tuttle, New York City (Breed, Abbott & Morgan, Edward J. Ross and Miriam C. Feigelson, New York City, of counsel), for appellants.
Ronald R. Glancz, Atty., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C. (William D. Ruckelshaus, Asst. Atty. Gen., Alan S. Rosenthal, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellee.
Before MOORE and SMITH, Circuit Judges, and WEINFELD, District Judge.
Of the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The decision of the Tax Court, holding (1) the provisions of the Renegotiation Act of 1951, as amended (50 U.S.C. App. § 1211 et seq.) to be applicable to excessive profits realized under a Capehart Act housing contract (42 U.S.C § 1594-1594k; 12 U.S.C. § 1748-1748h-3) and (2) such application to be constitutional, is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Mulroney, reported at 51 T.C. No. 89 (March 4, 1969).