Case Name: Pat SEACHORD, Petitioner, v. David R. ENGLISH, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1972-02-16
Citations: 259 So. 2d 136
Docket Number: No. 40841
Parties: Pat SEACHORD, Petitioner, v. David R. ENGLISH, Respondent.
Judges: ROBERTS, C. J., BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., and SACK, Circuit Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 259
Pages: 136–138

Head Matter:
Pat SEACHORD, Petitioner, v. David R. ENGLISH, Respondent.
No. 40841.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Feb. 16, 1972.
Thomas A. Hoadley, West Palm Beach, of Howell, Kirby, Montgomery, D’Aiuto, Dean & Hallowes, Jacksonville, for petitioner.
Larry Klein of Cone, Wagner, Nugent, Johnson & McKeown, West Palm Beach, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable conflict jurisdiction in this Court to review the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, 243 So. 2d 193 (1971). We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that there is no conflict and that the scholarly opinion by then District Court of Appeal Judge David L. McCain is eminently correct in enunciating the law.
There is no conflict and, therefore, no jurisdiction in this Court. The writ must accordingly be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
ROBERTS, C. J., BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., and SACK, Circuit Judge, concur.
ERVIN, J., dissents with opinion.