Case Name: HARRY R. YOUNG ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. JAMES R. CRUMBIE, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1928-05-14
Citations: 104 N.J.L. 669
Docket Number: 
Parties: HARRY R. YOUNG ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. JAMES R. CRUMBIE, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 104
Pages: 669–669

Head Matter:
HARRY R. YOUNG ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. JAMES R. CRUMBIE, APPELLANT.
Argued February 16, 1928
Decided May 14, 1928.
For the respondents, Bourgeois & Coulomb.
For the appellant, Louis A. Bepetto.

Opinion:
Pee Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Katzenbach, Campbell, Yan Buskirk, Mc-Glennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.