Case Name: Lange, Respondent, v. Manhattan Ry. Co. et al., Appellants
Court: New York Superior Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1892-07-05
Citations: 19 N.Y.S. 1022
Docket Number: 
Parties: Lange, Respondent, v. Manhattan Ry. Co. et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 19
Pages: 1022–1022

Head Matter:
Lange, Respondent, v. Manhattan Ry. Co. et al., Appellants.
(Superior Court of New York City,
General Term.
July 5, 1892.)
Action by Louise Lange against the Manhattan Railway Company and the Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company.
Argued before Dugro and Gildersleeve, JJ.
Davies, Short & Townsend, for appellants. Byram L. Winters, for respondent.

Opinion:
Dugro, J.
The defendants endeavored to prove their defense upon the cross-examination of plaintiff before the plaintiff had rested. In refusing to allow this, the court committed no error. The case was fairly tried, and no error appears which requires reversal.
The judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs.