Case Name: Thomas Pitt, Respondent, v. City of New York et al., Defendants, and James Mugan, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1984-10-09
Citations: 63 N.Y.2d 815
Docket Number: 
Parties: Thomas Pitt, Respondent, v City of New York et al., Defendants, and James Mugan, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 63
Pages: 815–816

Head Matter:
Thomas Pitt, Respondent, v City of New York et al., Defendants, and James Mugan, Appellant.
Argued September 13, 1984;
decided October 9, 1984
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
John J. Kearns for appellant.
David M. Goldberg for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative for reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Fritz W. Alexander at the Appellate Division (94 AD2d 202).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.