Case Name: PERKERSON v. DIRECTOR OF PATUXENT INSTITUTION
Court: Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jurisdiction: Maryland
Decision Date: 1961-10-19
Citations: 226 Md. 666
Docket Number: App. No. 19
Parties: PERKERSON v. DIRECTOR OF PATUXENT INSTITUTION
Judges: 
Reporter: Maryland Reports
Volume: 226
Pages: 666–666

Head Matter:
PERKERSON v. DIRECTOR OF PATUXENT INSTITUTION
[App. No. 19,
September Term, 1961.]
Decided October 19, 1961.
Before Henderson, Hammond, Horney, Marbury and Sybert, JJ.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
In this case Perkerson petitioned the court below for re-determination of his status as a defective delinquent. Counsel was appointed upon his affidavit that he was without funds, and he elected trial before the court. After a hearing, he was found to be still a defective delinquent and recommitted. He noted an appeal, which the court treated as an application for leave to appeal under Code (1960 Supp.), Art. 3 IB, sec. 11. There was no attempt, however, to comply with Maryland Rule 894-2 (a), which provides: "The application shall contain a concise statement of the reasons why the order should be reversed or modified, and shall include a list of the errors allegedly committed by the lower court." In the absence of any specification of errors, there is nothing before us to review.
Application denied.