Case Name: Daniel McCampbell, Respondent, v. Cunard Steamship Company, Limited, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1894-02
Citations: 83 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 609
Docket Number: 
Parties: Daniel McCampbell, Respondent, v. Cunard Steamship Company, Limited, Appellant.
Judges: Pratt and Dykman, JJ., concurred.
Reporter: Supreme Court Reports (Hun)
Volume: 83
Pages: 609–609

Head Matter:
Daniel McCampbell, Respondent, v. Cunard Steamship Company, Limited, Appellant.

Opinion:
Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs.—
Cullen, J.:
This is an appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff entered on the verdict of a jury. The action was servant against master to recover for personal injuries suffered, owing to the alleged negligence of the defendant. On the first trial of the action, I directed the complaint to be dismissed On appeal, that decision was reversed. (23 N. Y. Supp. 477.) As both my associates concurred in the opinion delivered on appeal, which covers the question now raised, and as. the trial court followed the law laid down by the General Term, it follows that this judgment must be affirmed. Judgment and order' denying new trial affirmed, with costs.
Pratt and Dykman, JJ., concurred.