Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Deron HALL, a.k.a. D-Shock, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-07-14
Citations: 336 F. App'x 942
Docket Number: No. 08-16281
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Deron HALL, a.k.a. D-Shock, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before TJÓFLAT, EDMONDSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 336
Pages: 942–944

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Deron HALL, a.k.a. D-Shock, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-16281
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
July 14, 2009.
John Lovell, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before TJÓFLAT, EDMONDSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Deron Hall appeals his sentence of 90 months of imprisonment for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute at least five kilograms of cocaine. 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A)(ii), 846. Hall argues that the district court should not have enhanced his sentence by two levels for the possession of a firearm. We affirm.
We review de novo the application of an enhancement for the possession of a dangerous weapon to a sentence. United States v. Pham, 463 F.3d 1239, 1245 (11th Cir.2006). A district court may enhance a sentence by two levels "[i]f a dangerous weapon (including a firearm) was possessed" during an offense involving drugs. U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1). A defendant charged in a conspiracy to distribute drugs may receive a two-level enhancement for the possession of a firearm when a cocon-spirator possessed the weapon in furtherance of the conspiracy and the possession was reasonably foreseeable by the defendant. United States v. Fields, 408 F.3d 1356, 1359 (11th Cir.2005). "Once the government shows that a firearm was present, 'the evidentiary burden shifts to the defendant to show that a connection between the firearm and the offense is clearly improbable.' " Id. (quoting United States v. Hall, 46 F.3d 62, 63 (11th Cir.1995)).
The district court did not err by enhancing Hall's sentence. Hall argues that the government failed to prove he knew about, possessed, or saw a coconspirator in possession of a firearm during the drug conspiracy, but that argument is incredible in the light of the evidence that Hall worked for a national organization, the Black Mafia Family, that distributed cocaine and transported drugs and firearms in hidden compartments of modified high-end luxury cars. Hall loaded and unloaded cocaine from a storage facility and a Hummer sport utility vehicle where law enforcement discovered several firearms. Even if Hall did not possess a firearm, it was reasonably foreseeable that a cohort possessed a firearm during the conspiracy. See United States v. Westry, 524 F.3d 1198, 1221 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 251, 172 L.Ed.2d 189 (2008), and, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 902, 173 L.Ed.2d 119 (2009); Pham, 463 F.3d at 1245-46; Fields, 408 F.3d at 1359. Hall failed to present any evidence that the connection between the firearms and the conspiracy was clearly improbable.
Hall's sentence is AFFIRMED.