Case Name: R.G. ROSS CONSTRUCTION CO., Appellant, v. G.J. GREWE, INC. and Kenrick Developers Investment Inc., Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2016-04-05
Citations: 489 S.W.3d 854
Docket Number: ED 103152
Parties: R.G. ROSS CONSTRUCTION CO., Appellant, v. G.J. GREWE, INC. and Kenrick Developers Investment Inc., Respondents.
Judges: Before: Philip M. Hess, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 489
Pages: 854–855

Head Matter:
R.G. ROSS CONSTRUCTION CO., Appellant, v. G.J. GREWE, INC. and Kenrick Developers Investment Inc., Respondents.
ED 103152
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Filed: April 5, 2016
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 11, 2016
Application for Transfer Denied June 28, 2016
Richard J. Magee, 8000 Maryland Avenue, Suite 900, St. Louis, MO 63105, for appellant.
Kevin M. Cushing, Teresa Dale Pupillo, Erin M. Edelman, 120 S Central Avenue, Suite 1800, St. Louis, MO 63105, for respondents. .
Before: Philip M. Hess, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant R.G. Ross Construction Co., Inc. (Ross) appeals the judgment in favor of G.J. Grewe, Inc. (Grewe) and Kenrick Developers Investment, Inc., in Ross' action to recover monies Ross claimed it spent in performing preconstruction services on a development project. The trial court determined that a valid settlement agreement existed and entered a judgment enforcing the settlement. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant's motion. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2015).