Case Name: JOHN G. OSTROWSKI AND DOLORES OSTROWSKI, HUSBAND AND WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. CAPE TRANSIT CORP. AND TED M. LIVELY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS AND JOHN DOES 1-5, JOINTLY, SEVERALLY OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, DEFENDANTS
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 2005-03-17
Citations: 182 N.J. 585
Docket Number: 
Parties: JOHN G. OSTROWSKI AND DOLORES OSTROWSKI, HUSBAND AND WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. CAPE TRANSIT CORP. AND TED M. LIVELY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS AND JOHN DOES 1-5, JOINTLY, SEVERALLY OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, DEFENDANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 182
Pages: 585–585

Head Matter:
868 A.2d 321
JOHN G. OSTROWSKI AND DOLORES OSTROWSKI, HUSBAND AND WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. CAPE TRANSIT CORP. AND TED M. LIVELY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS AND JOHN DOES 1-5, JOINTLY, SEVERALLY OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, DEFENDANTS.
Argued February 28, 2005
Decided March 17, 2005.
F. Herbert Owens, III, argued the cause for appellants (Cooper Levenson April Niedelman & Wagenheim and Sweeney & Sheehan, attorneys; Gerard W. Quinn, on the briefs).
Lars S. Hyberg, argued the cause for respondents (McAllister, Hyberg, White & Cohen, attorneys).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Skillman's opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 371 N.J.Super. 499, 853 A.2d 985 (2004).
For affirmance — Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices LONG, LaVECCHIA, ZAZZALI, ALBIN, WALLACE and RIVERA-SOTO — 7.
Opposed — None.