Case Name: SCOPILLITI v. STILLER
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1924-02-11
Citations: 2 Ohio Law Abs. 154
Docket Number: No. 4872
Parties: SCOPILLITI v. STILLER
Judges: Patterson, Houck and Shields, JJ., Sitting
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 2
Pages: 154–154

Head Matter:
No. 148
SCOPILLITI v. STILLER
Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist., Cuyahoga County
No. 4872.
Decided Feb. 11, 1924
Patterson, Houck and Shields, JJ., Sitting
465. ERROR — Agreed statement of facts must appear on the record or court is without power to review alleged error.
Attorneys — Saffran, Nuncio and Romano, for Scopilliti; Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, for Stiller; all of Cleveland.

Opinion:
HOUCK, J.
Error to the Cleveland Municipal Court
Epitomized Opinion
First Publication of this Opinion
The above plaintiff obtained a judgment against the defendant in the Municipal Court, which the trial judge therein set aside and granted a new trial. From this, error is prosecuted from that court direct to the Court of Appeals to obtain a reversal of the judgment on the ground that the trial court abused his discretion in granting a new trial.
No bill of exceptions was taken but the case was to be heard in Appeals in lieu therefor, upon an agreed statement of facts.
The Court of Appeals held that it was necessary to get the agreed statement on the record by a bill'of exceptions, or in a journal entry, and there being none, this court has no power to review the alleged error of the Municipal Court.