Case Name: Raymond J. Duffy, Plaintiff, v. Chemical Bank et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants. Cushman & Wakefield, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2000-12-14
Citations: 278 A.D.2d 102
Docket Number: 
Parties: Raymond J. Duffy, Plaintiff, v Chemical Bank et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants. Cushman & Wakefield, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 278
Pages: 102–102

Head Matter:
Raymond J. Duffy, Plaintiff, v Chemical Bank et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants. Cushman & Wakefield, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
[717 NYS2d 532]

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Goodman, J.), entered on or about October 12, 1999, which, upon reargument, granted the previously denied motion of third-party defendant Cushman & Wakefield, Inc. to dismiss the third-party complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
In view of the service agreement between defendant and third-party plaintiff building owners and third-party defendant management company requiring third-party plaintiffs to purchase insurance and indemnify third-party defendant with respect to claims such as those asserted by plaintiff in the main action, the third-party action was properly dismissed (see, Santamaria v 1125 Park Ave. Corp., 238 AD2d 259). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Tom, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.