Case Name: Thomas Adams & Co., Limited, Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. Mayer, et al., Defendants and Appellants
Court: New York Superior Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1891-01-05
Citations: 12 N.Y.S. 957
Docket Number: 
Parties: Thomas Adams & Co., Limited, Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. Mayer, et al., Defendants and Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 12
Pages: 957–957

Head Matter:
Thomas Adams & Co., Limited, Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. Mayer, et al., Defendants and Appellants.
(Superior Court of New York City, General Term.
January 5,1891.)
Appeal from jury term.
Argued before Sedgwick, C. J., and Freedman, J.
David Leventritt, for appellants. MacFarland, Boardman & Platt, for respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The issues in this case have been retried, in conformity with the decision of this court upon the former appeal, as reported in 4 N. Y. Supp. 715. Upon a review of the case as now presented, none of the exceptions taken constitute, when all the circumstances are considered, sufficient ground for reversal, nor can it be held that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence. The judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs.