Case Name: Winter, Inc. v. Urban Redevelopment Commission
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1970-10-14
Citations: 160 Conn. 546
Docket Number: 
Parties: Winter, Inc. v. Urban Redevelopment Commission
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 160
Pages: 546–546

Head Matter:
Winter, Inc. v. Urban Redevelopment Commission
Alcorn, C. J., House, Cotter, Thim and Ryan, Js.
Argued October 7
decided October 14, 1970
Lawrence Gochberg, for the appellant (plaintiff).
Robert M. Wechsler, for the appellee (defendant).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Because the findings of subordinate facts are fatally inconsistent, the conclusion of the referee as to the fair market value of the real estate cannot be sustained.
There is error, the judgment is set aside and the case is remanded for a new trial.