Case Name: Svetlana KRAVTCHOUK, Appellant, v. Igor KRAVTCHOUK, Respondent/Cross-Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-10-19
Citations: 155 S.W.3d 765
Docket Number: No. ED 82610
Parties: Svetlana KRAVTCHOUK, Appellant, v. Igor KRAVTCHOUK, Respondent/Cross-Appellant.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 155
Pages: 765–765

Head Matter:
Svetlana KRAVTCHOUK, Appellant, v. Igor KRAVTCHOUK, Respondent/Cross-Appellant.
No. ED 82610.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Oct. 19, 2004.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied Jan. 26, 2005.
Theodore S. Schechter, Jeffrey Steven Schechter, co-counsel, Clayton, MO, for appellant.
James Patrick Carmody, Allan H. Zer-man, co-counsel, Clayton, MO, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Svetlana Kravtchouk (Wife) appeals from the trial court's judgment (1) modifying the terms of maintenance and child support contained in the Judgment and Decree of Dissolution (Decree) dissolving the marriage of Wife and Igor Kravtchouk (Husband), and (2) denying Wife's Motion to Dismiss. Husband cross-appeals. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence and the trial court did not abuse its discretion in its modification of the parties' dissolution decree. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 84.1625(b).