Case Name: Roylin Junius BEALE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Deputy J.P. MADIGAN; Officer R. Blow; Officer Harless; Officer Peele; Officer Corprew, Defendants-Appellees, and Captain Phillips, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-12-23
Citations: 589 F. App'x 107
Docket Number: No. 14-7394
Parties: Roylin Junius BEALE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Deputy J.P. MADIGAN; Officer R. Blow; Officer Harless; Officer Peele; Officer Corprew, Defendants-Appellees, and Captain Phillips, Defendant.
Judges: Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 589
Pages: 107–107

Head Matter:
Roylin Junius BEALE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Deputy J.P. MADIGAN; Officer R. Blow; Officer Harless; Officer Peele; Officer Corprew, Defendants-Appellees, and Captain Phillips, Defendant.
No. 14-7394.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 18, 2014.
Decided: Dec. 23, 2014.
Roylin Junius Beale, Appellant Pro Se. Scott Christopher Hart, Sumrell, Sugg, Carmichael, Hicks & Hart, PA, New Bern, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Roylin Junius Beale appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Beale v. Madigan, No. 5:ll-et-03244-F (E.D.N.C. Aug. 27, 2014). We dispense with oral •argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.