Case Name: Bertha Waltenberg, Respondent, v. Percival J. Bernhard, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1899-05
Citations: 27 Misc. 794
Docket Number: 
Parties: Bertha Waltenberg, Respondent, v. Percival J. Bernhard, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 27
Pages: 794–795

Head Matter:
Bertha Waltenberg, Respondent, v. Percival J. Bernhard, Appellant.
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the General Term of the City Court, affirming a judgment of the Trial Term of the City Gourt in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon-a verdict of a, juiy$ and also affirming an order denying a motidn made by the déféndant for a new trial.
James C. McEachen (Abraham I. Elkus, of counsel), for appellant.
Alfred & Charles Steckler, for respondent.

Opinion:
Freedman, P. J.
The appeal of the defendant is from an order of the General Term of the City Court affirming a judgment entered against him upon the verdict of a jury, etc.- The notice of appeal to this court embraces nothing else. The record shows, however, that judgment of affirmance was duly entered upon said order, and that no appeal was taken from such judgment. The appeal from the order should be dismissed, with costs.
MacL-eah and Leventritt, JJ., concur.
Appeal dismissed, with costs to respondent.