Case Name: United States v. Alaska; Hemphill v. Housing Authority of the City of Charleston et al.; Smith v. California Fair Employment and Housing Commission et al.; Abbey v. Sverdrup Corp. et al.; Christy v. Magnuson et al.; Scott v. Nachman; Carter v. Amtrak National Railroad Passenger Corporation; Maxwell v. Texas; Perez v. United States; Veatch v. United States; Vasquez v. Office of Personnel Management et al.; Taplin v. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division; Gangi v. Baybank, FSB, et al.; Sidles v. United States District Court for the District of Arizona; Siddiqui v. New York; Howard v. Caspari, Superintendent, Missouri Eastern Correctional Center; In re Rodriguez, Hart v. California et al.; Bergne v. United States District Court for the Central District of California; Causey v. United States; Oberuch v. Arizona et al.; Lewis v. Supreme Court of California et al.; McBroom v. Franklin County Board of Elections; Grant v. In Rem Release Board et al.; Loyer v. Loyer et al. (two judgments); Barbary v. Sturm et al.; In re Carney et al., Smith v. Biller et al.; Elder v. Merit Systems Protection Board; Toney v. United States; Short v. United States; Bundy v. United States; Burns v. United States; Schwarz v. Merit Systems Protection Board; Banks v. United States et al.; Bannister v. Bowersox, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center; Collins v. Farmers Home Administration et al.; Tinsley v. United States
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1997-09-12
Citations: 521 U.S. 1144
Docket Number: No. 84, Orig; No. 94-9498; No. 96-31; No. 96-1903; No. 96-5609; No. 96-7326; No. 96-7703; No. 96-7878; No. 96-7929; No. 96-7957; No. 96-8405; No. 96-8483; No. 96-8491; No. 96-8534; No. 96-8535; No. 96-8590; No. 96-8639; No. 96-8668; No. 96-8681; No. 96-8686; No. 96-8699; No. 96-8722; No. 96-8761; No. 96-8803; No. 96-8817; No. 96-8939; No. 96-8947; No. 96-9014; No. 96-9038; No. 96-9046; No. 96-9071; No. 96-9073; No. 96-9079; No. 96-9094; No. 96-9115; No. 96-9137; No. 96-9175; No. 96-9237
Parties: United States v. Alaska, Hemphill v. Housing Authority of the City of Charleston et al., Smith v. California Fair Employment and Housing Commission et al., Abbey v. Sverdrup Corp. et al., Christy v. Magnuson et al., Scott v. Nachman, Carter v. Amtrak National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Maxwell v. Texas, Perez v. United States, Veatch v. United States, Vasquez v. Office of Personnel Management et al., Taplin v. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Gangi v. Baybank, FSB, et al., Sidles v. United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Siddiqui v. New York, Howard v. Caspari, Superintendent, Missouri Eastern Correctional Center, In re Rodriguez, Hart v. California et al., Bergne v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, Causey v. United States, Oberuch v. Arizona et al., Lewis v. Supreme Court of California et al., McBroom v. Franklin County Board of Elections, Grant v. In Rem Release Board et al., Loyer v. Loyer et al. (two judgments); Barbary v. Sturm et al., In re Carney et al., Smith v. Biller et al., Elder v. Merit Systems Protection Board, Toney v. United States, Short v. United States, Bundy v. United States, Burns v. United States, Schwarz v. Merit Systems Protection Board, Banks v. United States et al., Bannister v. Bowersox, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center, Collins v. Farmers Home Administration et al., Tinsley v. United States,
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 521
Pages: 1144–1145

Head Matter:
No. 84, Orig.
No. 94-9498.
No. 96-31.
No. 96-1903.
No. 96-5609.
No. 96-7326.
No. 96-7703.
No. 96-7878.
No. 96-7929.
No. 96-7957.
No. 96-8405.
No. 96-8483.
No. 96-8491.
No. 96-8534.
No. 96-8535.
No. 96-8590.
No. 96-8639.
No. 96-8668.
No. 96-8681.
United States v. Alaska, Hemphill v. Housing Authority of the City of Charleston et al., Smith v. California Fair Employment and Housing Commission et al., Abbey v. Sverdrup Corp. et al., Christy v. Magnuson et al., Scott v. Nachman, Carter v. Amtrak National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Maxwell v. Texas, Perez v. United States, Veatch v. United States, Vasquez v. Office of Personnel Management et al., Taplin v. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Gangi v. Baybank, FSB, et al., Sidles v. United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Siddiqui v. New York, Howard v. Caspari, Superintendent, Missouri Eastern Correctional Center, In re Rodriguez, Hart v. California et al., Bergne v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, Causey v. United States, Oberuch v. Arizona et al., Lewis v. Supreme Court of California et al., McBroom v. Franklin County Board of Elections, Grant v. In Rem Release Board et al., Loyer v. Loyer et al. (two judgments); Barbary v. Sturm et al., In re Carney et al., Smith v. Biller et al., Elder v. Merit Systems Protection Board, Toney v. United States, Short v. United States, Bundy v. United States, Burns v. United States, Schwarz v. Merit Systems Protection Board, Banks v. United States et al., Bannister v. Bowersox, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center, Collins v. Farmers Home Administration et al., Tinsley v. United States,

Opinion:
ante, p. 1;
516 U. S. 838;
ante, p. 1129;
ante, p. 1122;
ante, p. 1122;
520 U. S. 1107;
520 U. S. 1213;
520 U. S. 1175;
520 U. S. 1175;
520 U. S. 1149;
ante, p. 1122;
520 U. S. 1255;
520 U. S. 1256;
520 U. S. 1267;
520 U. S. 1267;
520 U. S. 1234;
520 U. S. 1208;
520 U. S. 1279;
520 U. S. 1279;
No. 96-8686.
No. 96-8699.
No. 96-8722.
No. 96-8761.
No. 96-8803.
No. 96-8817.
No. 96-8939.
No. 96-8947.
No. 96-9014.
No. 96-9038.
No. 96-9046.
No. 96-9071.
No. 96-9073.
No. 96-9079.
No. 96-9094.
No. 96-9115.
No. 96-9137.
No. 96-9175.
No. 96-9237.
520 U. S. 1235;
520 U. S. 1279;
ante, p. 1106;
ante, p. 1107;
ante, p. 1123;
ante, p. 1123;
ante, p. 1125;
ante, p. 1109;
ante, p. 1117;
ante, p. 1109;
ante, p. 1109;
ante, p. 1110;
ante, p. 1110;
ante, p. 1110;
ante, p. 1126;
ante, p. 1110;
ante, p. 1126;
ante, p. 1127; and
ante, p. 1128. Petitions for rehearing denied.