Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Perry COUSINS, a/k/a Pzo, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-05-31
Citations: 473 F. App'x 287
Docket Number: No. 12-6319
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Perry COUSINS, a/k/a Pzo, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 473
Pages: 287–288

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Perry COUSINS, a/k/a Pzo, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-6319.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 24, 2012.
Decided: May 31, 2012.
Perry Cousins, Appellant, Pro Se. Robert Edward Bradenham, II, Howard Jacob Zlotnick, Assistant United States Attorneys, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Perry Cousins appeals the district court's order denying his pro se motion for the production of trial transcripts. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Cousins, No. 4:10-cr00047-RBS-TEM-1, 2012 WL 614171 (E.D.Va. Feb. 14, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.