Case Name: Wendell D. LLOYD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dean LOCKLEAR, Superintendent, New Hanover Correctional; Officer Hoffler; North Carolina Department of Public Safety; Inmate Grievance Resolution Board, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-10-20
Citations: 669 F. App'x 691
Docket Number: No. 16-6636
Parties: Wendell D. LLOYD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dean LOCKLEAR, Superintendent, New Hanover Correctional; Officer Hoffler; North Carolina Department of Public Safety; Inmate Grievance Resolution Board, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 669
Pages: 691–691

Head Matter:
Wendell D. LLOYD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dean LOCKLEAR, Superintendent, New Hanover Correctional; Officer Hoffler; North Carolina Department of Public Safety; Inmate Grievance Resolution Board, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-6636
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: October 18, 2016
Decided: October 20, 2016
Wendell D. Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
PER CURIAM:
Wendell D. Lloyd appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Lloyd's motion to appoint counsel, and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lloyd v. Locklear, No. 5:15-ct-03262-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 22, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED