Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. JOE BERRY BISHOP (Nos. 101826 and 101827), Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1972-12-15
Citations: 12 Or. App. 48
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. JOE BERRY BISHOP (Nos. 101826 and 101827), Appellant.
Judges: Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Foley and Fort, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 12
Pages: 48–48

Head Matter:
Argued December 1,
affirmed December 15, 1972,
petition for rehearing denied January 17, petition for review denied March 21, 1973
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. JOE BERRY BISHOP (Nos. 101826 and 101827), Appellant.
503 P2d 721
Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.
Thomas II. Denney, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Lee Johnson, Attorney General, and John W. Osburn, Solicitor General, Salem.
Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Foley and Fort, Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. State v. Darroch, 8 Or App 32, 492 P2d 308 (1971), aff'd 264 Or 54, 504 P2d 84 (1972), cert denied 412 US 948 (1973).