Case Name: Curtis ESPIRIT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-02-02
Citations: 750 So. 2d 150
Docket Number: No. 3D00-66
Parties: Curtis ESPIRIT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before JORGENSON, COPE and LEVY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 750
Pages: 150–150

Head Matter:
Curtis ESPIRIT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D00-66.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 2, 2000.
Curtis Espirit, in proper person.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before JORGENSON, COPE and LEVY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant filed a two-page conclusory motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 which did not explain the basis for any of appellant's claims. The motion was properly denied. On appeal, defendant has filed a forty-six page brief which outlines his position, but the arguments he now makes were never made to the trial court. Accordingly we do not consider them.
This affirmance is without prejudice to the appellant to refile a proper Rule 3.850 motion. In so saying, we do not express any opinion on the merits of appellant's claims.
Affirmed.