Case Name: Zara Ellis SADLER, PHD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Barbara Claire TILLEY, PHD, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-09-05
Citations: 239 F. App'x 819
Docket Number: No. 07-1332
Parties: Zara Ellis SADLER, PHD, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Barbara Claire TILLEY, PHD, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 239
Pages: 819–820

Head Matter:
Zara Ellis SADLER, PHD, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Barbara Claire TILLEY, PHD, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 07-1332.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 30, 2007.
Decided: Sept. 5, 2007.
Zara Ellis Sadler, Appellant Pro Se. Morris Dawes Cooke, Jr., Lucinda Gardner Wichmann, John William Fletcher, Alissa DeCarlo, Barnwell, Whaley, Patterson & Helms, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Zara Ellis Sadler seeks to appeal the district court's order denying her motion for appointment of counsel. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Sadler seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We also deny Sadler's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.