Case Name: Max Schimkevitz, Respondent, v. Theodore A. Bingham, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, and Others, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1908-05-08
Citations: 125 A.D. 792
Docket Number: 
Parties: Max Schimkevitz, Respondent, v. Theodore A. Bingham, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, and Others, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 125
Pages: 792–793

Head Matter:
Max Schimkevitz, Respondent, v. Theodore A. Bingham, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, and Others, Appellants.
First Department,
May 8, 1908.
See head note in Shepard v. Bingham (ante, p. 784).
Appeal by the defendants, Theodore A. Bingham, as police commissioner of the city of New York, and others, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Mew York on the 14th day of February, 1908, continuing a temporary injunction pendente lite.
Theodore Connoly, for the appellants.
Samuel Cohen, for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam :
The question presented on this appeal is the same as that presented in the casez of Shepard v. Bingham (125 App. Div. 784), decided herewith, and for the reasons there stated the order appealed from is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion for an injunction denied, with ten dollars costs.
Present — Ingeaham, McLaughlin, Laughlin, Claeke and Scott, JJ.