Case Name: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. SOUTHWIRE COMPANY, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1963-03-06
Citations: 313 F.2d 638
Docket Number: No. 20008
Parties: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. SOUTHWIRE COMPANY, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 313
Pages: 638–639

Head Matter:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. SOUTHWIRE COMPANY, Respondent.
No. 20008.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
March 6, 1963.
Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Alfred Brummel, Atty., Washington, D. C., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison, Atty., National Labor Relations Bd., for petitioner.
Frank M. Swift, Atlanta, Ga., Smith, Swift, Currie, McGhee & Hancock, Atlanta, Ga., Holderness & Word, Carroll-ton, Ga., for respondent.
Before JONES and BELL, Circuit Judges, and GROOMS, District Judge,

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this proceeding for the enforcement against the respondent of an order of the petitioner, National Labor Relations Board, the only question before us is whether there is substantial evidence on the record as a whole to sustain the Board's findings. No purpose would be served by a recital of the evidence or of the fact issues which were resolved by the Board. There is substantial evidence to support the findings. The Board's order will be
Enforced.