Case Name: SUGARMAN v. GOLDBERG
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1906-11-14
Citations: 100 N.Y.S. 1012
Docket Number: 
Parties: SUGARMAN v. GOLDBERG.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 100
Pages: 1012–1012

Head Matter:
SUGARMAN v. GOLDBERG.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
November 14, 1906.)
Vendos and Purchases—Incumbrances—Unexpired Lease.
A lease which does not terminate until after the time fixed in a contract of sale of the premises for the delivery of a deed thereof is an incumbrance.
[Ed. Note.—For cases in point, see vol. 48, Cent Dig. Vendor and Purchaser, § 252.]
Appeal from City Court of New York.
Action by Joseph Sugarman against Samuel Goldberg. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.
Argued before GILDERSLEEVE, DUGRO, and DOWLING, JJ.
Joseph Wilkenfeld, for appellant.
Tobias A. Keppler, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The surrender of the lease was from April 30th; the time for delivery of the deed, April 11th. Manifestly the lease was an incumbrance not provided for in the contract, and the plaintiff is entitled to recover. The case shows no prejudicial error.
The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.