Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Elias Martin AQUINO-MIRANDA, Defendant-Appellant; United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Elias Aquino-Miranda, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-01-04
Citations: 707 F. App'x 843
Docket Number: No. 17-50255 Cons. w/ No. 17-50256 Summary Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Elias Martin AQUINO-MIRANDA, Defendant-Appellant United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Elias Aquino-Miranda, Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before KING, ELROD, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 707
Pages: 843–844

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Elias Martin AQUINO-MIRANDA, Defendant-Appellant United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Elias Aquino-Miranda, Defendant-Appellant
No. 17-50255 Cons. w/ No. 17-50256 Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed January 4, 2018
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Elias Martin Aquino-Miranda, Pro Se
Before KING, ELROD, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Elias Aquino-Miranda has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Aquino-Miranda has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.