Case Name: DAVID CONKLIN ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. C. FRANKLIN WILSON, JUDGE, ETC., RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1927-10-17
Citations: 104 N.J.L. 166
Docket Number: 
Parties: DAVID CONKLIN ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. C. FRANKLIN WILSON, JUDGE, ETC., RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 104
Pages: 166–166

Head Matter:
DAVID CONKLIN ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. C. FRANKLIN WILSON, JUDGE, ETC., RESPONDENT.
Argued May 17, 1927
Decided October 17, 1927.
For the appellants, Elmer W. Romine.
For the respondent, Charles A. Raihhun.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Parker, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.