Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 408 PEYTON ROAD, S.W., Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia, Including all buildings and appurtenances thereon, described in Exhibit A attached, Defendant-Appellant, 451 Hope Court, S.W., Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia, Including all buildings and appurtenances thereon, described in Exhibit B attached, Defendant, Robert Richardson, Claimant-Appellant, Carswell Denson, et al., Claimants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1998-01-23
Citations: 133 F.3d 1378
Docket Number: No. 95-8330
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 408 PEYTON ROAD, S.W., Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia, Including all buildings and appurtenances thereon, described in Exhibit A attached, Defendant-Appellant, 451 Hope Court, S.W., Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia, Including all buildings and appurtenances thereon, described in Exhibit B attached, Defendant, Robert Richardson, Claimant-Appellant, Carswell Denson, et al., Claimants.
Judges: Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 133
Pages: 1378–1378

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 408 PEYTON ROAD, S.W., Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia, Including all buildings and appurtenances thereon, described in Exhibit A attached, Defendant-Appellant, 451 Hope Court, S.W., Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia, Including all buildings and appurtenances thereon, described in Exhibit B attached, Defendant, Robert Richardson, Claimant-Appellant, Carswell Denson, et al., Claimants.
No. 95-8330.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Jan. 23, 1998.
Jerome C. Ware, Ware & Otonicar, Smyrna, GA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Earle Antoine Davidson, Giddens, Davidson & Mitchell, Atlanta, GA, for Claimants.
Albert L. Kemp, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.
Senior U.S. Circuit Judge Peter T. Fay has elected to not participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(c).

Opinion:
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion: 112 F.3d 1106 (11th Cir.1997)).
BY THE COURT:
A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on whether this ease should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges of this court in active service having voted in favor of granting rehearing en bane,
IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby
VACATED.