Case Name: In re The TIZ CORPORATION, d/b/a the Spotted Stag, Debtor. DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TIZ CORPORATION, d/b/a the Spotted Stag, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1985-07-29
Citations: 766 F.2d 1536
Docket Number: No. 84-3579
Parties: In re The TIZ CORPORATION, d/b/a the Spotted Stag, Debtor. DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TIZ CORPORATION, d/b/a the Spotted Stag, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 766
Pages: 1536–1536

Head Matter:
In re The TIZ CORPORATION, d/b/a the Spotted Stag, Debtor. DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TIZ CORPORATION, d/b/a the Spotted Stag, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 84-3579
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
July 29, 1985.
Thomas L. Barnhart, Dept, of Business' Regulation, Tallahassee, Fla., for plaintiff-appellant.
Patti W. Massari, Tampa, Fla., Thomas C. Little, Clearwater, Fla., for defendant-appellee.
Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, KRAV-ITCH and HATCHETT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The appeal of the bankruptcy court's order authorizing the sale of a liquor license is moot because no stay was ever granted. See e.g., In re Sewanee Land, Coal and Cattle, Inc., 735 F.2d 1294 (11th Cir.1984); American Grain Association v. Lee-Vac, Ltd, 630 F.2d 245 (5th Cir.1980). We find nothing in the plain language of the subsection, or of the legislative history, or the caselaw, that creates an exception for appeals based upon alleged violations of state law.
The appeal is DISMISSED.