Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eliseo MEJIA-MORALES, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-03-19
Citations: 31 F. App'x 544
Docket Number: No. 01-10259; D.C. No. CR-00-01491-FRZ
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Eliseo MEJIA-MORALES, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 31
Pages: 544–545

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Eliseo MEJIA-MORALES, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 01-10259. D.C. No. CR-00-01491-FRZ.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 11, 2002 .
Decided March 19, 2002.
Before FARRIS, W. FLETCHER and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Eliseo Mejia-Morales appeals the 84-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). His attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Mejia-Morales has not filed a supplemental pro se brief. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no issue for appeal.
Accordingly, we GRANT the motion to withdraw as counsel of record for appellant and the district court's judgment is
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.