Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Corey THOMAS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-10-02
Citations: 479 F. App'x 511
Docket Number: No. 12-7031
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Corey THOMAS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 479
Pages: 511–511

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Corey THOMAS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-7031.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 27, 2012.
Decided: Oct. 2, 2012.
Corey Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina; Robert J. Higdon, Jr., Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Ap-pellee.
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Corey Thomas appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Thomas, No. 3:94-cr-00109-FDW-2 (W.D.N.C. May 31, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.