Case Name: Celedonio VARGAS-VIVAR, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-07-13
Citations: 442 F. App'x 308
Docket Number: No. 10-72592
Parties: Celedonio VARGAS-VIVAR, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: SCHROEDER, ALARCÓN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 442
Pages: 308–308

Head Matter:
Celedonio VARGAS-VIVAR, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 10-72592.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 12, 2011.
Filed July 13, 2011.
Alma David, Rios Cantor, P.S., Seattle, WA, for Petitioner.
Sara Bergene, OIL, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
Before: SCHROEDER, ALARCÓN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Celedonio Vargas-Vivar, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' decision dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge's denial of his application for cancellation of removal based on his failure to establish the requisite hardship to his qualifying United States citizen children.
We lack jurisdiction to review the IJ's discretionary determination that Vargas-Vivar did not demonstrate "exceptional and extremely unusual hardship," and Vargas-Vivar has not presented a colorable constitutional claim for us to review. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.