Case Name: Ronald O. HARPER, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1990-08-21
Citations: 794 S.W.2d 340
Docket Number: No. 56800
Parties: Ronald O. HARPER, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 794
Pages: 340–340

Head Matter:
Ronald O. HARPER, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent.
No. 56800.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Aug. 21, 1990.
J. Bryan Allee, Columbia, for plaintiff/appellant.
William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for defendant/respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
Movant was sentenced on April 12, 1985. He had until June 30, 1988, to file a post-conviction motion. His motion, however, was not filed until February 17, 1989. The motion court denied his motion, because it was not timely filed.
Movant's contention the time limitations imposed by Rule 24.035(b) violates his constitutional rights is meritless. This issue has been considered and rejected in Day v. State, 770 S.W.2d 692 (Mo.banc 1989).
The judgment of the motion court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would serve no precedential value.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).