Case Name: Clatte WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-03-15
Citations: 157 S.W.3d 760
Docket Number: No. ED 84776
Parties: Clatte WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 157
Pages: 760–760

Head Matter:
Clatte WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 84776.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
March 15, 2005.
Gwenda R. Robinson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Alison K Brown, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Clattee Williams, Jr. ("movant") appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15 on the merits without an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims that he was denied effective assistance of counsel because counsel failed to make a specific objection to the submission of the verdict directing instruction for the charge of second degree assault of a law enforcement officer.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).