Case Name: Donald MERCARDO, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-11-20
Citations: 386 S.W.3d 212
Docket Number: No. ED 98066
Parties: Donald MERCARDO, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 386
Pages: 212–212

Head Matter:
Donald MERCARDO, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 98066.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Nov. 20, 2012.
Jessica Hathaway, St. Louis, MO, for Movant/Appellant.
Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent/Respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Donald Mercardo appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing from his guilty plea to seven counts of second-degree assault of a law enforcement officer. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k); Nesbitt v. State, 335 S.W.3d 67, 69 (Mo.App. E.D.2011). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2011, unless otherwise indicated.