Case Name: Herbert ARNOLD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2007-07-05
Citations: 961 So. 2d 998
Docket Number: No. 4D06-3916
Parties: Herbert ARNOLD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: STONE, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 961
Pages: 998–999

Head Matter:
Herbert ARNOLD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D06-3916.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
July 5, 2007.
Herbert Arnold, Miami, pro se.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Joseph A. Tringali, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Herbert Arnold seeks review of an order that denied his multi-point rule 3.850 motion. We remand for the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing limited solely to Arnold's claim that counsel coerced him into waiving his right to testify. See, e.g., Oisorio v. State, 676 So.2d 1363, 1364-65 (Fla.1996); Barrientos v. State, 929 So.2d 705 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).
STONE, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.