Case Name: J. Gerber & Co., Inc. v. United States
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1968-03-21
Citations: 60 Cust. Ct. 805
Docket Number: R.D. 11504; Entry No. 708699
Parties: J. Gerber & Co., Inc. v. United States
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Volume: 60
Pages: 805–806

Head Matter:
(R.D. 11504)
J. Gerber & Co., Inc. v. United States
Entry No. 708699.
(Decided March 21, 1968)
Siegel, Mandell & Davidson for the plaintiff.
Edwin L. Weisl, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Opinion:
Ford, Judge:
The proper value for dutiable purposes of certain electrical equipment covered by the above appeal for a reappraisement is before the court for determination.
The xiarties hereto have entered into a stipulation of fact wherein it has been agreed as follows:
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, as to the merchandise covered by the appeal for reap-praisement enumerated above:
That on the date of exportation thereof to the United States, the market values or the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Japan, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the appraised values, less the buying commission, as stated on the invoices.
That all of the merchandise covered by the appeal for reappraisement the subject of this stipulation was entered subsequent to Febru ary 27, 1958, and none of tire merchandise is identified in the Final List published by the Secretary of the Treasury, T.D. 54521.
That the appeal for reappraisment enumerated above be deemed submitted on this stipulation for decision.
Upon the record before the court, I find and hold that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 91 Treas. Dec. 295, T.D. 54165, is the proper basis of value for the electrical equipment in issue and that said value is the appraised value, net packed, less the buying commission as stated on the invoice.
Judgment will be entered accordingly.