Case Name: Charles L. NICHOLS et ux., Plaintiffs-Appellants v. COPPERITE, INC., Defendant-Appellee; Charles W. MAYER et ux., Plaintiffs-Appellants v. COPPERITE, INC., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1960-10-31
Citations: 283 F.2d 866
Docket Number: Nos. 14036, 14037
Parties: Charles L. NICHOLS et ux., Plaintiffs-Appellants v. COPPERITE, INC., Defendant-Appellee. Charles W. MAYER et ux., Plaintiffs-Appellants v. COPPERITE, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 283
Pages: 866–867

Head Matter:
Charles L. NICHOLS et ux., Plaintiffs-Appellants v. COPPERITE, INC., Defendant-Appellee. Charles W. MAYER et ux., Plaintiffs-Appellants v. COPPERITE, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
Nos. 14036, 14037.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
Oct. 31, 1960.
Carroll D. Kilgore, Nashville, Tenn., for appellants.
Thomas J. Johnson, Jr., Chicago, 111., Tyree B. Harris, III, Nashville, Tenn., Defrees, Fiske, O’Brien, Thomson & Simmons, Chicago, 111., and Hooker, Keeble, Dodson & Harris, Nashville, Tenn., on brief, for appellee.
Before McALLISTER, Chief Judge, and MARTIN and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER.
The above cause coining on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties and the argument of counsel in open court, and the Court being duly advised:
Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be and is hereby affirmed upon the findings of fact and conclusions of law of Judge William E. Miller.