Case Name: Rudolph L. Reed, Plaintiff, v. City of Syracuse, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff. David A. Hudson, Third-Party Defendant; David A. Hudson, Second Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Rudolph L. Reed et al., Second Third-Party Defendants-Appellants-Respondents, and City of Syracuse, Second Third-Party Defendant-Respondent-Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2003-10-02
Citations: 309 A.D.2d 1197
Docket Number: Appeal No. 2
Parties: Rudolph L. Reed, Plaintiff, v City of Syracuse, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff. David A. Hudson, Third-Party Defendant. David A. Hudson, Second Third-Party Plaintiff, v Rudolph L. Reed et al., Second Third-Party Defendants-Appellants-Respondents, and City of Syracuse, Second Third-Party Defendant-Respondent-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 309
Pages: 1197–1198

Head Matter:
Rudolph L. Reed, Plaintiff, v City of Syracuse, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff. David A. Hudson, Third-Party Defendant. David A. Hudson, Second Third-Party Plaintiff, v Rudolph L. Reed et al., Second Third-Party Defendants-Appellants-Respondents, and City of Syracuse, Second Third-Party Defendant-Respondent-Appellant.
(Appeal No. 2.)
[765 NYS2d 299]

Opinion:
Appeal and cross appeal from an order and judgment (one document) of Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Major, J.), entered March 14, 2002, which granted the motion of the City of Syracuse for summary judgment dismissing the cross claim of the County of Onondaga.
It is hereby ordered that said cross appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed and the order is affirmed without costs.
Same memorandum as Reed v City of Syracuse (309 AD2d 1195 [2003]). Present — Green, J.P., Wisner, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.