Case Name: Ronald FRITZMEYER, Claimant/Appellant, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Employer/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-07-16
Citations: 95 S.W.3d 116
Docket Number: No. ED 80513
Parties: Ronald FRITZMEYER, Claimant/Appellant, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Employer/Respondent.
Judges: Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 95
Pages: 116–117

Head Matter:
Ronald FRITZMEYER, Claimant/Appellant, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Employer/Respondent.
No. ED 80513.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
July 16, 2002.
Harry J. Nichols, Erwin S. Barbre, Jr., Law Office of Harry Nichols St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
E. Thomas Líese, Holtkamp, Líese, Childress & Schultz, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Claimant appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, which reversed the award of the Administrative Law Judge. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. No error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished, for their information only, with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).