Case Name: Richard O'Neal, Employee v. Inline Fluid Power, Inc. & Automotive Parts Co., Inc., Employer and Auto Owners Insurance Company, Carrier
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 2016-04-13
Citations: 794 S.E.2d 799
Docket Number: No. 261PA15
Parties: Richard O'Neal, Employee
v.
Inline Fluid Power, Inc. & Automotive Parts Co., Inc., Employer
and
Auto Owners Insurance Company, Carrier
Judges: 
Reporter: South Eastern Reporter 2d
Volume: 794
Pages: 799–799

Head Matter:
Richard O'Neal, Employee
v.
Inline Fluid Power, Inc. & Automotive Parts Co., Inc., Employer
and
Auto Owners Insurance Company, Carrier
No. 261PA15
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
April 13, 2016.
Leonard T. Jernigan, Jr., Attorney at Law, Raleigh, Kristina Brown Thompson, Attorney at Law, M. Hayes Jernigan, Attorney at Law, for O'Neal, Richard.
Viral V. Mehta, Attorney at Law, Jordan A. Benton, Attorney at Law, Carl M. Short, III, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for Inline Fluid Power, Inc. & Automotive Parts Co., Inc., et al.
ORDER

Opinion:
Upon consideration of the Plaintiff's Petition for Discretionary Review, the Plaintiff's Petition for Discretionary Review is allowed as to issue number two only. The petition is denied as to any remaining issues. Further, Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Petition for Discretionary Review is allowed; Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Response to Motion to Amend Petition for Discretionary Review is denied.
By order of this Court in Conference, this 13thday of April, 2016.