Case Name: HARRY SMITH, APPELLANT, v. INHABITANTS OF THE CITY OF TRENTON, RESPONDENT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1914-07-10
Citations: 86 N.J.L. 702
Docket Number: 
Parties: HARRY SMITH, APPELLANT, v. INHABITANTS OF THE CITY OF TRENTON, RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 86
Pages: 702–702

Head Matter:
HARRY SMITH, APPELLANT, v. INHABITANTS OF THE CITY OF TRENTON, RESPONDENT.
Submitted June 17, 1914
Decided July 10, 1914.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, in which court the following per cuñam was filed:
“The ordinance brought up for review was enacted pursuant to the powers conferred upon the city of Trenton by Pamph. L. 1910, p. 140, and by Pamph. L. 1904, p. 283.
“The sole objection to the ordinance has been disposed of in an opinion this day filed in Delaware River Transportation Co. v. Inhabitants of the City of Trenton, 90 Atl. Rep. 731.
“The ordinance will be affirmed, with costs.”
For the appellant, William B. Blackman.
For the respondent, Charles B. Bird.

Opinion:
Pee Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Kalisch, Bogert, Vre-DENBURGH, WHITE, HbPPENHEIMER, WILLIAMS, JJ. 12.
For reversal — Minturn, Black, JJ. 2.