Case Name: Bernard BRIGHT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Quincy's Family Steakhouse; Palmer Work Release Center, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-08-24
Citations: 332 F. App'x 100
Docket Number: No. 07-1416
Parties: Bernard BRIGHT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Quincy’s Family Steakhouse; Palmer Work Release Center, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 332
Pages: 100–100

Head Matter:
Bernard BRIGHT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Quincy’s Family Steakhouse; Palmer Work Release Center, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 07-1416.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 20, 2009.
Decided: Aug. 24, .2009.
Bernard Bright, Appellant pro se.
Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Bernard Bright appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying his request for a refund of the filing fee. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bright v. S.C. Dep't of Corr., No. 3:07-cv-00214-JFA (D.S.C. Apr. 20, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.