Case Name: M&R Construction Corp., Respondent, v. IDI Construction Company, Inc., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2004-02-10
Citations: 4 A.D.3d 130
Docket Number: 
Parties: M&R Construction Corp., Respondent, v IDI Construction Company, Inc., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 4
Pages: 130–131

Head Matter:
(February 10, 2004)
M&R Construction Corp., Respondent, v IDI Construction Company, Inc., Appellant.
[771 NYS2d 346]

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lowe, III, J.), entered on or about October 1, 2002, which, to the extent appealed from, granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on its tenth cause of action, for an account stated, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
The court properly granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on its cause of action for an account stated. Defen dant's conclusory affidavit in opposition to the motion was insufficient to raise a triable issue as to whether plaintiffs statement of account was in fact disputed by defendant (see Morrison Cohen Singer & Weinstein v Ackerman, 280 AD2d 355 [2001]; Ruskin, Moscou, Evans & Faltischek v FGH Realty Credit Corp., 228 AD2d 294 [1996]).
Plaintiff's remaining arguments are unavailing. Concur— Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Sullivan and Marlow, JJ.