Case Name: Elsie EST, Appellant, v. APTED-HULLING, INC., Respondent, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri, as custodian of the Second Injury Fund
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1994-08-09
Citations: 880 S.W.2d 649
Docket Number: No. 65337
Parties: Elsie EST, Appellant, v. APTED-HULLING, INC., Respondent, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri, as custodian of the Second Injury Fund.
Judges: Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 880
Pages: 649–649

Head Matter:
Elsie EST, Appellant, v. APTED-HULLING, INC., Respondent, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri, as custodian of the Second Injury Fund.
No. 65337.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Aug. 9, 1994.
Ray B. Marglous, Clayton, for appellant.
Jeffrey Estes, William R. Gallagher, St. Louis, for respondent.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Vicky L. Anthony, Asst. Atty. Gen., Cape Girardeau, for Second Injury Fund.
Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Elsie Est, appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's decision finding appellant not permanently and totally disabled. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the findings of the Commission are supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the Commission's finding pursuant to Rule 84.-16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties here involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for the decision.