Case Name: In the Matter of the Claim of Sarah Kaplan, Appellant, against Kaplan Knitting Mills, Inc., and Another, Respondents. State Industrial Board, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1927-09-23
Citations: 221 A.D. 484
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Claim of Sarah Kaplan, Appellant, against Kaplan Knitting Mills, Inc., and Another, Respondents. State Industrial Board, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 221
Pages: 484–484

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Claim of Sarah Kaplan, Appellant, against Kaplan Knitting Mills, Inc., and Another, Respondents. State Industrial Board, Respondent.
Third Department,
September 23, 1927.
Samuel Weiss, for the appellant.
James J. Mahoney [George J. Stacy of counsel], for the respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Samuel Kaplan died February 24, 1923, as the result of injuries which he received that day in an elevator, while he was helping to move a machine of the Kaplan Knitting Mills, Inc., of which he was the treasurer.
An award was refused because notice of claim was not filed within the period of one year from his death. As to the widow, the decision must be affirmed. But the infant son did not have a general guardian until September 7, 1923, so that the time did not commence to run against him until that date. (Workmen's Compensation Law, § 115, as amd. by Laws of 1922, chap. 615; Chase v. Ulster & Delaware R. R. Co., 215 App. Div. 581.) Further, notice of election to sue, with a claim for deficiency compensation, dated February. 24, 1924, appears to have been filed March 7, 1924. That notice contains all of the requirements of a notice of claim and was filed within one year from the date of the appointment of the guardian, so that it was in time and the decision of the Industrial Board in the infant's case should be reversed and his claim should be remitted for hearing.
Cochrane, P. J., Van Kirk, Hinman, McCann and Whitmyer, JJ., concur.
Decision affirmed as to the mother, and decision reversed and claim remitted to the State Industrial Board as to the infant.