Case Name: NITA CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Robert KAGAN, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-08-16
Citations: 766 So. 2d 410
Docket Number: No. 3D00-402
Parties: NITA CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Robert KAGAN, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GODERICH and SORONDO, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 766
Pages: 410–411

Head Matter:
NITA CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Robert KAGAN, Appellee.
No. 3D00-402.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Aug. 16, 2000.
William L. Rogers, Miami, for appellant.
Stacy Bressler, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GODERICH and SORONDO, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Although counsel for Appellee's summation at trial contained improper arguments, we find these to be harmless. See § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (1999); Decks, Inc. v. Nunez, 299 So.2d 165 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974).
Affirmed.