Case Name: Samuel Strausberg, Appellant, v. Max A. Goldbaum, Respondent, Impleaded under Section 271 of the Civil Practice Act with Camedo Corporation, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1942-04-20
Citations: 264 A.D. 738
Docket Number: 
Parties: Samuel Strausberg, Appellant, v. Max A. Goldbaum, Respondent, Impleaded under Section 271 of the Civil Practice Act with Camedo Corporation, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 264
Pages: 738–738

Head Matter:
Samuel Strausberg, Appellant, v. Max A. Goldbaum, Respondent, Impleaded under Section 271 of the Civil Practice Act with Camedo Corporation, Appellant.

Opinion:
— Action at law. The complaint demands judgment for a sum of money only. Defendant-respondent in his answer pleaded an equitable counterclaim, which he also invoked as a defense. Order dated December 4, 1941, denying motion of plaintiff-appellant for a prior and separate trial of defendant-respondent's equitable counterclaim, and order dated January 27, 1942, denying a similar motion made by defendant-appellant, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.