Case Name: John GOSSETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DUNHILL OF CARY, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Dunhill Professional Search of West Raleigh, Defendant-Appellee; John Gossett, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Duke University Medical Center, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-03-29
Citations: 6 F. App'x 198
Docket Number: Nos. 00-2225, 00-2307
Parties: John GOSSETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DUNHILL OF CARY, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Dunhill Professional Search of West Raleigh, Defendant-Appellee. John Gossett, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Duke University Medical Center, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 6
Pages: 198–199

Head Matter:
John GOSSETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DUNHILL OF CARY, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Dunhill Professional Search of West Raleigh, Defendant-Appellee. John Gossett, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Duke University Medical Center, Defendant-Appellee.
Nos. 00-2225, 00-2307.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 28, 2001.
Decided March 29, 2001.
John Gossett, pro se. Robert Allen Sar, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, Raleigh, NC; John Morgan Simpson, Fulbright & Jaworski, Washington, DC, for appellees.
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
John Gossett appeals the district court's order dismissing his employment discrimination complaints against the Defendants. We have reviewed the records and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gossett v. Dunhill of Cary, Inc., No. CA-99-1008-1; Gossett v. Duke Univ. Med. Ctr., No. CA-99-985-1 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 14, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.