Case Name: Russell SANBORN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-02-13
Citations: 557 So. 2d 132
Docket Number: No. 89-1394
Parties: Russell SANBORN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before BASKIN, COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 557
Pages: 132–132

Head Matter:
Russell SANBORN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 89-1394.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 13, 1990.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Clayton R. Kaeiser, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Anita J. Gay, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before BASKIN, COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Agreeing with the trial court's pronouncements that clear and convincing reasons support departure from the sentencing guidelines, State v. Mischler, 488 So.2d 523 (Fla.1986); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(11), we affirm appellant's sentence.
Affirmed.
BASKIN and GERSTEN, JJ., concur.