Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenneth Lyle SPANGLE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-01-16
Citations: 54 F. App'x 653
Docket Number: No. 01-50590; D.C. No. CR-96-00148-GLT-1
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Kenneth Lyle SPANGLE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 54
Pages: 653–653

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Kenneth Lyle SPANGLE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 01-50590.
D.C. No. CR-96-00148-GLT-1.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 13, 2003.
Decided Jan. 16, 2003.
Before BEEZER, KLEINFELD and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Kenneth Lyle Spangle appeals from his 24-month sentence imposed following the revocation of his supervised release. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Spangle's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no arguable issues for review, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Spangle filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no issues warranting review. Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.