Case Name: Anthony PARRISH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1997-02-12
Citations: 687 So. 2d 367
Docket Number: No. 97-0116
Parties: Anthony PARRISH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: DELL, PARIENTE and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 687
Pages: 367–367

Head Matter:
Anthony PARRISH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 97-0116.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb. 12, 1997.
Anthony Parrish, Immokalee, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Based on the reasoning of our recent opinion in Freeman v. State, 679 So.2d 364 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), we affirm the denial of appellant's rule 3.850 motion but again certify to the supreme court the same question certified in Freeman:
IS STATE v. GRAY, 654 So.2d 552 (Fla.1995), RETROACTIVE?
DELL, PARIENTE and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.