Case Name: Alvin GRIGSBY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Darwin GUYTON, Detective; Paul Ebert; Richard Sanborn, Mr., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-06-26
Citations: 38 F. App'x 934
Docket Number: No. 02-6482
Parties: Alvin GRIGSBY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Darwin GUYTON, Detective; Paul Ebert; Richard Sanborn, Mr., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 38
Pages: 934–935

Head Matter:
Alvin GRIGSBY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Darwin GUYTON, Detective; Paul Ebert; Richard Sanborn, Mr., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 02-6482.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted June 20, 2002.
Decided June 26, 2002.
Alvin Grigsby, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Alvin Grigsby appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Grigsby v. Guyton, No. CA-02-91-2 (E.D.Va. Feb. 19, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.