Case Name: Charles Gene ROGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John T. BULLOCK; Don G. Wood; Boyd Bennett; Kenworthy; Mary Lu Rogers, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-06-02
Citations: 280 F. App'x 286
Docket Number: No. 07-7551
Parties: Charles Gene ROGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John T. BULLOCK; Don G. Wood; Boyd Bennett; Kenworthy; Mary Lu Rogers, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 280
Pages: 286–286

Head Matter:
Charles Gene ROGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John T. BULLOCK; Don G. Wood; Boyd Bennett; Kenworthy; Mary Lu Rogers, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 07-7551.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 13, 2008.
Decided: June 2, 2008.
Charles Gene Rogers, Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Bulluck Ricci, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Charles Gene Rogers appeals the order of the magistrate judge denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Rogers v. Bullock, No. 1:06-cv00350-PTS, 2007 WL 2712922 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 14, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.