Case Name: David B. CHICK, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2017-03-07
Citations: 512 S.W.3d 841
Docket Number: No. ED 104537
Parties: David B. CHICK, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Robert M. Clayton III, P. J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 512
Pages: 841–841

Head Matter:
David B. CHICK, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 104537
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
FILED: March 7, 2017
Timothy Forneris, Missouri Public Defender Office, St. Louis, MO, for Mov-ant/Appellant.
Josh Hawley, Attorney General, Nathan J. Aquino, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.
Before Robert M. Clayton III, P. J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
David B. Chick (Movant) appeals from the motion court's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Judgment denying Movant's Rule 24.035 claims for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).