Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Malcolm MALIK, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-08-20
Citations: 43 F. App'x 621
Docket Number: No. 02-6804
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Malcolm MALIK, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 43
Pages: 621–621

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Malcolm MALIK, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-6804.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 15, 2002.
Decided Aug. 20, 2002.
Malcolm Malik, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C.F. Shappert, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Malcolm Malik seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Malik, Nos. CR-96-15-V; CA-00-191-5 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 28, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.