Case Name: Norman Ben ASKEW, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Butch JACKSON; Richard O. Broadwell, III; Drew Stanley, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-10-20
Citations: 669 F. App'x 695
Docket Number: No. 16-6699
Parties: Norman Ben ASKEW, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Butch JACKSON; Richard O. Broadwell, III; Drew Stanley, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 669
Pages: 695–695

Head Matter:
Norman Ben ASKEW, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Butch JACKSON; Richard O. Broadwell, III; Drew Stanley, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-6699
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: October 18, 2016
Decided: October 20, 2016
Norman Ben Askew, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Finarelli, Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; Kelly Street Brown, Elizabeth Pharr McCullough, Young Moore & Henderson, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Norman Ben Askew appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Askew v. Jackson, No. 5:14-ct-03192-H (E.D.N.C. May 3, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED