Case Name: Thomas W. LOVEGROVE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BROCK & SCOTT, PLLC, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-10-11
Citations: 698 F. App'x 159
Docket Number: No. 17-1615
Parties: Thomas W. LOVEGROVE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BROCK & SCOTT, PLLC, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 698
Pages: 159–160

Head Matter:
Thomas W. LOVEGROVE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BROCK & SCOTT, PLLC, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 17-1615
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: September 28, 2017
Decided: October 11, 2017
Gary M. Bowman, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. Terry C. Frank, Benjamin A. Wills, KAUFMAN & CAÑOLES, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit,
PER CURIAM:
Thomas W. Lovegrove appeals from the district court's orders: (1) dismissing his complaint asserting claims under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692a(e) (2012), and fraud; and (2) denying his motions for reconsideration, Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) and for leave to file an amended complaint. We have reviewed the record included on appeal, as well as the parties' briefs, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lovegrove v. Brock & Scott, PLLC, No. 2:16-cv-00418-HCM-LRL, 2017 WL 216698, 2017 WL 216698 (E.D. Va. Jan. 17, 2017; Apr. 6, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED