Case Name: Buchholz, Appellant, vs. Breitbach, imp., Respondent
Court: Wisconsin Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Wisconsin
Decision Date: 1927-06-20
Citations: 193 Wis. 231
Docket Number: 
Parties: Buchholz, Appellant, vs. Breitbach, imp., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Wisconsin Reports
Volume: 193
Pages: 231–232

Head Matter:
Buchholz, Appellant, vs. Breitbach, imp., Respondent.
March 8
June 20, 1927.
For the appellant there was a brief by Walter Schinz, Jr., and Glicksman & Gold, attorneys, and Ray T. McCann, of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Mc-Cann and Mr. Walter L. Gold.
For the respondent Breitbach there was a brief by Shaw, Muskat & Sullivan of Milwaukee, and oral argument by William T. Sullivan.

Opinion:
The following opinion was filed April 5, 1927:
Doerfler, J.
This case and the case of Buchhols, an infant, v. Breitbach, decided herewith (ante, p. 224, 213 N. W. 329), were tried together as one case. This case, therefore, is ruled by the decision in the case in which the infant plaintiff was involved.
By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.
The appellant moved for a rehearing.
In support of the motion there was a brief by Walter Schinz, Jr., and Glicksman & Gold, attorneys, and Robert Wild, of counsel, all of Milwaukee.
In opposition thereto there was a brief by Shaw, Muskat & Sullivan of Milwaukee.
The motion was denied, with $25 costs, on June 20, 1927.