Case Name: Andrew J. SIGNORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA, a municipal governmental entity, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-06-23
Citations: 136 F. App'x 336
Docket Number: No. 05-10982
Parties: Andrew J. SIGNORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA, a municipal governmental entity, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before HULL, WILSON, and COX, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 136
Pages: 336–337

Head Matter:
Andrew J. SIGNORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA, a municipal governmental entity, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 05-10982
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
June 23, 2005.
Anna Cook, Montgomery, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Raxnadanah M. Salaam, Christopher K. Whitehead, H. Lewis Gillis, Thomas, Means, Gillis, & Seay, P.C., Montgomery, AL, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before HULL, WILSON, and COX, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Plaintiff, Andrew J. Signore, appeals the judgment of the district court on the ground that the district court erred in granting the Defendant City of Montgomery's motion for summary judgment. We agree with the district court that even if Signore was speaking on a matter of public concern, his First Amendment interests were outweighed by the City's interests in promoting the efficiency of the public services it performs. Pickering v. Bd. of Educ., 391 U.S. 563, 568, 88 S.Ct. 1731, 1734-35, 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968); Watkins v. Bowden, 105 F.3d 1344, 1352-53 (11th Cir.1997). We further agree with the district court that Signore did not properly raise any overbreadth challenge to the Montgomery Police Department regulations pursuant to which he was disciplined. The judgment of the district court is, therefore,
AFFIRMED.