Case Name: Tony L. HARRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARAMARK, Food Service Provider; B.J. Barnes, Sheriff; Officer Ramsey, Kitchen Supervisor; Lieutenant Watkins, Defendants-Appellees; Tony L. Harris, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. B.J. Barnes, Sheriff; County Commissioners; Captain Reid; Kenneth Watkins, Lieutenant; Sami Hassan, Dr.; Richard Cornwall, P.A., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-04-03
Citations: 470 F. App'x 150
Docket Number: Nos. 11-7700, 11-7701
Parties: Tony L. HARRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARAMARK, Food Service Provider; B.J. Barnes, Sheriff; Officer Ramsey, Kitchen Supervisor; Lieutenant Watkins, Defendants-Appellees. Tony L. Harris, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. B.J. Barnes, Sheriff; County Commissioners; Captain Reid; Kenneth Watkins, Lieutenant; Sami Hassan, Dr.; Richard Cornwall, P.A., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 470
Pages: 150–151

Head Matter:
Tony L. HARRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARAMARK, Food Service Provider; B.J. Barnes, Sheriff; Officer Ramsey, Kitchen Supervisor; Lieutenant Watkins, Defendants-Appellees. Tony L. Harris, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. B.J. Barnes, Sheriff; County Commissioners; Captain Reid; Kenneth Watkins, Lieutenant; Sami Hassan, Dr.; Richard Cornwall, P.A., Defendants-Appellees.
Nos. 11-7700, 11-7701.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 29, 2012.
Decided: April 3, 2012.
Tony L. Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Arthur Berkelhammer, Thadeus Matthew Creech, Smith Moore, LLP, Greensboro, North Carolina; Stephen D. Martin, Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; Matthew Livingston Mason, Guilford County Sheriffs Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina; Steven Price Weaver, Brother-ton, Ford, Yeoman & Berry, PLLC, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Tony L. Harris appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaints and imposing a prefiling injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harris v. Aramark, No. 1:10-cv-00072CCE-PTS (M.D.N.C. Dec. 5, 2011); Harris v. Barnes, No. 1:10-cv-00228-CCE-PTS (M.D.N.C. Dec. 5, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.