Case Name: Michael H. JORDAN, Appellant, v. Tom FINLAY, d/b/a Tom Finlay's Custom Automotive, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1979-05-01
Citations: 370 So. 2d 431
Docket Number: No. 78-1630
Parties: Michael H. JORDAN, Appellant, v. Tom FINLAY, d/b/a Tom Finlay’s Custom Automotive, Appellee.
Judges: Before PEARSON, HENDRY and HUB-BART, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 370
Pages: 431–431

Head Matter:
Michael H. JORDAN, Appellant, v. Tom FINLAY, d/b/a Tom Finlay’s Custom Automotive, Appellee.
No. 78-1630.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 1, 1979.
Rehearing Denied May 25, 1979.
Rash, Katzen & Kay and H. Stephen Rash, South Miami, for appellant.
Mills, Hodin & London and Alan J. Ho-din, Miami, for appellee.
Before PEARSON, HENDRY and HUB-BART, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant filed a counterclaim for conversion of an automobile in connection with a suit in the nature of interpleader filed by appellee. Appellant was granted summary judgment on the complaint in the nature of interpleader. Appellant's counterclaim for conversion was set for trial. A jury was empaneled and sworn. However, the trial judge voluntarily dismissed the counterclaim, without prejudice, on the ground that it was an improper adjunct to an inter-pleader suit.
Appellant contends that the trial court erred in dismissing the counterclaim. We find merit in this contention and reverse. See Trak Microwave Corporation v. Medaris Management, Inc., 236 So.2d 189 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970).
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings upon the counterclaim.