Case Name: Marina AUSTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Christopher ORMAN; Michael Lessmeier, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-08-16
Citations: 695 F. App'x 337
Docket Number: No. 16-35269
Parties: Marina AUSTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Christopher ORMAN; Michael Lessmeier, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 695
Pages: 337–338

Head Matter:
Marina AUSTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Christopher ORMAN; Michael Lessmeier, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-35269
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted August 9, 2017
Filed August 16, 2017
Marina Austin, Pro Se
Before: SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Marina Austin appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional violations arising from injuries sustained while riding on a bus. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir.1998) (order), and we affirm.
The district court properly dismissed the action because Austin failed to allege facts sufficient to show that defendants Orman and Lessmeier personally partici pated in the alleged rights deprivation. See Jones v. Williams, 297 F.3d 930, 934 (9th Cir. 2002) (liability under § 1983 requires personal participation by the defendant).
All pending motions and requests are denied.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.