Case Name: Arnow v. Ferguson et al.
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1890-02-12
Citations: 8 N.Y.S. 715
Docket Number: 
Parties: Arnow v. Ferguson et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 8
Pages: 715–715

Head Matter:
Arnow v. Ferguson et al.
(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department.
February 12, 1890.)
Costs—Allowance. '
So long as an order against several defendants, restricting them to one bill of costs, stands unreversed, only one judgment for costs can be entered.
Appeal from circuit court, Westchester county.
Action by Thomas C. Arnow against John D. Ferguson, Walter Charles, and others, in whicli there was a verdict for defendants. Defendant Ferguson appeals from an order vacating his judgment for costs.
Argued before Barnard, P. ,J„ and Dykman and Pratt, JJ.
William C. Reddy, for appellant. Baker & Risley, for respondent.

Opinion:
Dykman, J.
This was an action of trespass against several defendants, and the jury found a verdict for the defendants. Upon the rendition of the verdict the counsel for the plaintiff moved to restrict the defendants to one bill of costs, and that motion was granted, and one bill of costs was awarded to the defendant Charles. Then the defendant Ferguson caused a bill of costs to be taxed in his behalf, and entered a judgment therefor. That judgment was vacated on motion, and this is on appeal from that order. The statement of the case shows the irregularity of the judgment. So long as the order made at the trial stood unreversed, but one judgment for costs could be entered against the plaintiff. The order appealed from should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.