Case Name: Eric WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-03-21
Citations: 14 S.W.3d 667
Docket Number: No. ED 76825
Parties: Eric WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 14
Pages: 667–667

Head Matter:
Eric WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 76825.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
March 21, 2000.
Gwenda R. Robinson, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Karen L. Kramer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Eric Washington ("Movant") appeals the dismissal of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant asserts the absolute filing deadline imposed by Rule 29.15 is unconstitutional because it makes no provision for late filing for good cause shown.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).