Case Name: Ricardo BAILEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2007-04-27
Citations: 954 So. 2d 1264
Docket Number: No. 5D05-3288
Parties: Ricardo BAILEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: PLEUS, C.J., ORFINGER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 954
Pages: 1264–1264

Head Matter:
Ricardo BAILEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D05-3288.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
April 27, 2007.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Meghan Ann Collins, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison Leigh Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We agree that the trial court improperly sustained certain hearsay objections. However, such errors were harmless because the witness was later able to testify to those matters which had initially been wrongfully excluded. Wallace v. State, 766 So.2d 364, 371-72 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); see also Turner v. State, 809 So.2d 59, 62 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).
AFFIRMED.
PLEUS, C.J., ORFINGER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.