Case Name: In the Matter of Violet Wands, Respondent, v. Central Warehouse Corp. et al., Appellants. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1974-07-03
Citations: 45 A.D.2d 894
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Violet Wands, Respondent, v. Central Warehouse Corp. et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 45
Pages: 894–894

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Violet Wands, Respondent, v. Central Warehouse Corp. et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Opinion:
Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen's Compensation Board. No opinion. Herlihy, P. J., Greenblett, Sweeney and Main, JJ., concur; Reynolds, J., dissents and votes to reverse in the following memorandum. Reynolds, J. (dissenting). There is no tension shown in this case which would be sufficient to constitute an accident either as a matter of law under the eases or as a matter of substantial evidence. The record does not contain substantial medical evidence that the alleged tension was a contributing factor in the myocardial infarction and the decision should be reversed and the claim dismissed.