Case Name: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mbakpuo
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1995-08-23
Citations: 73 Ohio St. 3d 292
Docket Number: No. 94-2645
Parties: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mbakpuo.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 73
Pages: 292–295

Head Matter:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mbakpuo.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Mbakpuo (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 292.]
(No. 94-2645
Submitted April 24, 1995
Decided August 23, 1995.)
Geoffrey Stem, Disciplinary Counsel, and Sally Ann Steuk, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.
Chukwujindu Victor Mbakpuo, pro se.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Having reviewed the record, we concur in the board's finding that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(4), (5) and (6); 2-102(A)(4) and (C); 2-106(A); 3 — 101(B); 6-101(A)(3); and 7-101(A)(3); and Gov.Bar R. V(4)(G). We further concur in the recommended sanction. Respondent is therefore suspended from the practice of law in Ohio indefinitely. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.
Resnick, J., dissents and would disbar respondent.