Case Name: Robert CASTRO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-06-14
Citations: 791 So. 2d 1114
Docket Number: No. 4D99-2849
Parties: Robert CASTRO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: STONE and POLEN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 791
Pages: 1114–1115

Head Matter:
Robert CASTRO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D99-2849.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
June 14, 2000.
Opinion Denying Rehearing Jan. 31, 2001.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Tatjana Ostapoff, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robert R. Wheeler, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Tatjana Ostapoff, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant on rehearing.

Opinion:
WARNER, C.J.
Appellant challenges, inter alia, the trial court's decision allowing the jury to hear testimony by the victim of prior similar sexual acts committed by appellant on that same victim. He claims that the self-corroborating testimony was admitted in violation of Heuring v. State, 513 So.2d 122 (Fla.1987) and Saffor v. State, 660 So.2d 668 (Fla.1995). Appellant's challenge, however, is not preserved on appeal since his argument on appeal is different from his argument below, which was based on vagueness of the victim's testimony regarding the previous acts. See Tillman v. State, 471 So.2d 32, 35 (Fla.1985); Steinhorst v. State, 412 So.2d 332, 338 (Fla.1982). We affirm as to all other issues raised.
Affirmed.
STONE and POLEN, JJ., concur.