Case Name: Horowitz Bros. & Margareten et al., Appellants, v. Jerome Margareten et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1985-03-28
Citations: 64 N.Y.2d 1008
Docket Number: 
Parties: Horowitz Bros. & Margareten et al., Appellants, v Jerome Margareten et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 64
Pages: 1008–1011

Head Matter:
Horowitz Bros. & Margareten et al., Appellants, v Jerome Margareten et al., Respondents.
Argued February 6, 1985;
decided March 28, 1985
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Jacob W. Heller and Ira Kleiman for appellants.
George G. Gallantz, David Aronson and Allan E. Mayefsky for respondents.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, and the judgment of Supreme Court reinstated, without costs.
The finding of the trial court that the February 18, 1910 agreement was not followed by the shareholders over the years more closely comports with the weight of the evidence than does the finding of the Appellate Division. While there is some evidence to the contrary, the scales are tipped by the testimony of witnesses, active in the corporation from 1916 to 1980, that a resolution of March 21, 1938 embodied a change of business practice from that contemplated by the February 1910 agreement. We have considered the plaintiffs' other contentions and find them without merit.
The 203 pages of plaintiffs' brief and reply brief invoke our denial of costs. We stress again that our reluctance to impose a limitation on the length of briefs "[t]oo often is merely viewed as a license to substitute volume for logic in an apparent attempt to overwhelm the courts" (Slater v Gallman, 38 NY2d 1, 5).
Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Alexander and Lynch concur in memorandum; Judge Kaye taking no part.
Order reversed, etc.
Designated pursuant to NY Constitution, article VI, § 2.