Case Name: LOS ANGELES BRANCH NAACP, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1984-02-16
Citations: 725 F.2d 1257
Docket Number: No. 81-5772
Parties: LOS ANGELES BRANCH NAACP, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 725
Pages: 1249–1258

Head Matter:
LOS ANGELES BRANCH NAACP, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
No. 81-5772.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Feb. 16, 1984.
G. William Shea, Peter W. James, McCutchen, Black, Verleger & Shea, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellees.
Thomas I. Atkins, Gen. Counsel, Brooklyn, N.Y., for defendants-appellants.
(Opinion Sept. 1, 1988, 9 Cir., 1983, 714 F.2d 935)
Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, TANG, SKOPIL, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, FERGUSON, NELSON, CANBY, BOOCHEVER, NORRIS and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by an en banc panel of the court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment is withdrawn.