Case Name: Protests 373326-G, etc., of R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. (New York)
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1940-01-19
Citations: 4 Cust. Ct. 370
Docket Number: No. 43047
Parties: Protests 373326-G, etc., of R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. (New York).
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Volume: 4
Pages: 370–370

Head Matter:
No. 43047.
Protests 373326-G, etc., of R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion:
Opinion by
Tilson, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel lace window curtains similar to those the subject of Billwiller v. United States (T. D. 44911) and filet articles like those passed upon in United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430. Artificial flowers of the same character as those the subject of Robinson-Goodman v. United States (17 C. C. P. A. 149, T. D. 43473) were held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 1419.