Case Name: HUD OIL & REFINING CO. v. OKLAHOMA CITY
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1934-02-20
Citations: 167 Okla. 457
Docket Number: No. 22244
Parties: HUD OIL & REFINING CO. v. OKLAHOMA CITY.
Judges: RILEY, O. J., CULLISON., V. O. J., and SWINDALL and O'SBORN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 167
Pages: 457–458

Head Matter:
HUD OIL & REFINING CO. v. OKLAHOMA CITY.
No. 22244.
Feb. 20, 1934.
Rehearing Denied March 13, 1934.
Twyford & Smith, for plaintiff in error.
Harlan T. Deupree, Municipal Counselor, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
ANDREWS, J.
The only issue presented on appeal in this cause which was presented in the trial court, which granted an injunction, was determined by this court in cause numbered 21722, C. C. Julian Oil & Royalties Co. v. Oklahoma City, this day de cided, 167 Okla. 384, 29 P. (2d) 952. The rule therein stated is applied herein. Therein we applied the rule stated by this court in Gant et al. v. Oklahoma City, 150 Okla. 86, 6 P. (2d) 1065, and Gant et al. v. Oklahoma City et al., 160 Okla. 62, 15 P. (2d) 833, and by the Supreme Court oí the United States in Gant et al. v. Oklahoma City et al., 289 U. S. 98, 77 L. Ed. 1058, 53 S. Ct. 530.
There is no error in the judgment of the trial court, and it is in all things affirmed.
RILEY, O. J., CULLISON., V. O. J., and SWINDALL and O'SBORN, JJ., concur.