Case Name: Bonnie Renee McKENZIE, Appellant, v. Neil Douglas McKENZIE, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-01-20
Citations: 648 So. 2d 326
Docket Number: No. 94-1062
Parties: Bonnie Renee McKENZIE, Appellant, v. Neil Douglas McKENZIE, Appellee.
Judges: HARRIS, C.J., and PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 648
Pages: 326–327

Head Matter:
Bonnie Renee McKENZIE, Appellant, v. Neil Douglas McKENZIE, Appellee.
No. 94-1062.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Jan. 20, 1995.
William D. Palmer and Kathleen F. Loer-zel, Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith & Cutler, P.A., Orlando, for appellant.
Walter R. Moon, Butler, McDonald & Moon, Orlando, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Under the circumstances of this case, the lower court should have permitted appellant to amend her answer to request rehabilita tive alimony. Talbert v. Talbert, 364 So.2d 541 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Chaachou v. Chaachou, 118 So.2d 73, 76 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 122 So.2d 408 (Fla.1960).
REVERSED.
HARRIS, C.J., and PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.