Case Name: D.F.S. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. COUSE CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1983-09-14
Citations: 437 So. 2d 219
Docket Number: No. 82-2540
Parties: D.F.S. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. COUSE CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, Appellee.
Judges: DOWNEY, LETTS and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 437
Pages: 219–220

Head Matter:
D.F.S. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. COUSE CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, Appellee.
No. 82-2540.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Sept. 14, 1983.
John R. Young of Hamilton, James, Mer-kle & Young, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Louis R. McBane of O’Connell, Cooper, Parrish & McBane, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We reverse and remand. The trial court erred in dismissing the complaint with prejudice as the allegations and attached documents, taken together, were sufficient to state a cause of action. See Hinote v. Brigman, 44 Fla. 589, 33 So. 303 (1902); Delta Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. McDevitt & Street Company, 262 So.2d 226 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972); and Edward L. Nezelek, Inc. v. Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Co., 383 So.2d 979 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).
DOWNEY, LETTS and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.