Case Name: Steven MORALES; Luciano Morales, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Officer Dominique RICHARDSON, Badge No. 3066; Prince George's County, Maryland, a body corporate and politic, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-08-29
Citations: 475 F. App'x 894
Docket Number: No. 12-1324
Parties: Steven MORALES; Luciano Morales, Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. Officer Dominique RICHARDSON, Badge No. 3066; Prince George’s County, Maryland, a body corporate and politic, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 475
Pages: 894–895

Head Matter:
Steven MORALES; Luciano Morales, Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. Officer Dominique RICHARDSON, Badge No. 3066; Prince George’s County, Maryland, a body corporate and politic, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 12-1324.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 2, 2012.
Decided: Aug. 29, 2012.
Terrell N. Roberts, III, Roberts & Wood, Riverdale, Maryland, for Appellants. Tonia Y. Belton-Gofreed, Prince George’s County Office of Law, Upper Marlboro, Maryland; Daniel Karp, Russell Gray, Karpinski, Colaresi & Karp, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Steven Morales appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) claims and its subsequent order denying his motion to amend the judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Morales v. Richardson, No. 8:11-ev-03215-JFM, 841 F.Supp.2d 908 (D. Md. Jan. 30, 2012); (Mar. 6, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.