Case Name: HOSPITAL CORPORATION OF AMERICA, d/b/a University Community Hospital, Petitioner, v. Jo Ann LAWYER and Claude Lawyer, and Doctor Crile Doscher and Doctor Cora Sue Golden, Respondents
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1978-10-18
Citations: 363 So. 2d 848
Docket Number: No. 78-988
Parties: HOSPITAL CORPORATION OF AMERICA, d/b/a University Community Hospital, Petitioner, v. Jo Ann LAWYER and Claude Lawyer, and Doctor Crile Doscher and Doctor Cora Sue Golden, Respondents.
Judges: ANSTEAD and LETTS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 363
Pages: 848–849

Head Matter:
HOSPITAL CORPORATION OF AMERICA, d/b/a University Community Hospital, Petitioner, v. Jo Ann LAWYER and Claude Lawyer, and Doctor Crile Doscher and Doctor Cora Sue Golden, Respondents.
No. 78-988.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Oct. 18, 1978.
Rehearing Denied Nov. 22, 1978.
Paul R. Regensdorf of Fleming, O’Bryan & Fleming, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.
Arthur N. Cohen of Cohen & Kokus, Miami, for plaintiffs/respondents.
Watson, Hubert & Davis, Fort Lauder-dale, for defendants/respondents.

Opinion:
MOORE, Judge.
This is a petition for writ of common law certiorari seeking review of the final decision of a medical mediation panel which was formed and conducted its proceedings pursuant to Section 768.44, Florida Statutes. We issued our rule to show cause to which the respondents filed a response. After numerous other pleadings the matter is now before us for final decision.
In Ans v. Pagnotti, 362 So.2d 459 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978) this Court adopted the reasoning contained in Hubacher v. Landry, 360 So.2d 42 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978) and dismissed a similar petition for writ of certio-rari which sought review on evidentiary grounds of the decision of a medical mediation panel. On the basis of Ans, supra, and Hubacher, supra, we determine that petitioner has failed to demonstrate jurisdiction in this Court for review by common law certiorari of a decision of a medical mediation panel.
We therefore dismiss the petition for writ of certiorari.
ANSTEAD and LETTS, JJ., concur.