Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Patrice Behanzin WILSON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-05-23
Citations: 10 F. App'x 158
Docket Number: No. 00-7525
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Patrice Behanzin WILSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 10
Pages: 158–158

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Patrice Behanzin WILSON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 00-7525.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 27, 2001.
Decided May 23, 2001.
Patrice Behanzin Wilson, pro se. Robert Edward Skiver, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, NC, for appellee.
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Patrice Behanzin Wilson seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion to waive or defer his criminal fine and construing his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion attacking his criminal conviction as a motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000) and denying the same. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error in either the district court's construal of the Rule 60(b) motion as a § 2255 motion or its subsequent denial of that motion. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss as to that claim on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Wilson, Nos. CR-96-34-5-BR; CA-00-229-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Sept. 13, 2000).
Addressing Wilson's motion to waive or defer his criminal fine, we note that Wilson failed to raise this claim on direct appeal and has not demonstrated cause and prejudice for this failure. Accordingly, we find the claim waived. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.