Case Name: Rudolph MAXWELL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2006-09-01
Citations: 937 So. 2d 216
Docket Number: No. 3D05-2284
Parties: Rudolph MAXWELL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before GERSTEN, GREEN, and SUAREZ, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 937
Pages: 216–216

Head Matter:
Rudolph MAXWELL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D05-2284.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Sept. 1, 2006.
Rudolph Maxwell, in proper person.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Robin F. Hazel, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before GERSTEN, GREEN, and SUAREZ, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The defendant appeals the trial court's summary denial of his motion for post conviction relief alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The defendant's claims are legally insufficient and conclusively refuted by the record. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850; Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D), Walls v. State, 926 So.2d 1156 (Fla.2006).
Affirmed.