Case Name: Robert Christopher CLARK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2016-07-29
Citations: 196 So. 3d 571
Docket Number: No. 5D16-561
Parties: Robert Christopher CLARK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ORFINGER and COHEN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 196
Pages: 571–572

Head Matter:
Robert Christopher CLARK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D16-561.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
July 29, 2016.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Jeri M. Delgado, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PALMER, J.
In this Anders appeal, Robert Christopher Clark (the defendant), challenges his judgment and sentence. Our review of the record revealed no reversible error apparent on its face. See State v. Causey, 503 So.2d 321 (Fla.1987). However, we discovered a scrivener's error in the sentencing document'. Specifically, the heading of the sentencing document'reads sentences as to "Count I, III, & III" when it should read "Counts I, II, & III". Accordingly, we remand for correction of the scrivener's error. See Taylor v. State, 120 So.3d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013) (explaining that scrivener's errors in sentencing documents may be corrected by an Anders appeal).
AFFIRMED; REMANDED.
ORFINGER and COHEN, JJ., concur.
. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).