Case Name: J. Tortorella Swimming Pools, Inc., Appellant, v. Incredible Coatings Corp., Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2006-12-05
Citations: 35 A.D.3d 376
Docket Number: 
Parties: J. Tortorella Swimming Pools, Inc., Appellant, v Incredible Coatings Corp., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 35
Pages: 376–376

Head Matter:
J. Tortorella Swimming Pools, Inc., Appellant, v Incredible Coatings Corp., Respondent.
[824 NYS2d 732]

Opinion:
In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Emerson, J.), dated January 6, 2006, which granted the defendant's motion to dismiss the action and denied its cross motion to compel the defendant to accept service of its complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
To avoid dismissal for failure to timely serve a complaint after a demand therefor has been served pursuant to CPLR 3012 (b), a plaintiff must demonstrate a reasonable excuse for the delay in serving the complaint and a meritorious cause of action (see Maldonado v Suffolk County, 23 AD3d 353, 353-354 [2005]; Gagnon v J.S. Intl. Shipping Corp., 8 AD3d 336, 337 [2004]). The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the defendant's motion to dismiss the action because the plaintiffs unspecified law office failure excuse did not constitute a reasonable excuse (see Quinn v Wenco Food Sys., Co., 269 AD2d 437 [2000]; Bravo v New York City Hous. Auth., 253 AD2d 510 [1998]). Florio, J.P., Crane, Spolzino and Covello, JJ., concur.