Case Name: COLLEGE OF PATERSON, A BODY CORPORATE, PROSECUTOR, v. STATE BOARD OF TAX APPEALS AND THE CITY OF PATERSON, DEFENDANTS
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1943-12-14
Citations: 131 N.J.L. 57
Docket Number: 
Parties: COLLEGE OF PATERSON, A BODY CORPORATE, PROSECUTOR, v. STATE BOARD OF TAX APPEALS AND THE CITY OF PATERSON, DEFENDANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 131
Pages: 57–59

Head Matter:
COLLEGE OF PATERSON, A BODY CORPORATE, PROSECUTOR, v. STATE BOARD OF TAX APPEALS AND THE CITY OF PATERSON, DEFENDANTS.
Submitted October 5, 1943
Decided December 14, 1943.
Before Brogan, Chief Justice, and Justices Bodine and Colie.
Por the prosecutor, Edward G. Weiss.
For the respondent City of Paterson, George Surosky.

Opinion:
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Colie, J.
The question raised on this writ of certiorari is whether the real estate and personal property of the College of Paterson was exempt from taxation by virtue of R. S. 54:4-3.6 reading in part: "The following property shall he exempt from taxation under this chapter: All buildings actually used for colleges, schools, academies or seminaries; the land whereon the buildings are erected, which does not exceed five acres in extent; the furniture and personal property in said buildings if used in and devoted to the purposes above mentioned;
The real estate was assessed for the tax year of 1941 at $9,100; the personal property at $500. The prosecutor appealed to the Passaic County Board of Taxation and the assessment was reduced to $8,500 on the real ('state; the assessment on the personal property remaining the same. Prosecutor appealed to the State Board of Tax Appeals, asserting its right to exemption on the ground that it was fundamentally a charitable and philanthropic institution, not conducted for profit. The State Board of Tax Appeals denied prosecutor's claim and affirmed the action of the County Board of Tax Appeals. To review this last action, a writ of certiorari was allowed.
College of Paterson was incorporated in 1934 under the act entitled "An act to incorporate associations not for pecuniary profits." Its object, as stated by article 2 of its by-laws is "to present to young men and women, in two years study through a flexible curriculum in the fields of arts, science and business those influences that develop the qualities embodied in the ideals of Light, Liberty and Learning." The moving spirits of the enterprise were Dr. Herbert S. Robinson and his wife, Sara D. Robinson, who were respectively its president and registrar. In 1935 the buildings involved were purchased by Saher, Inc., and by that corporation turned over to the college. There was no cash consideration for the transfer to the college, although Mrs. Robinson stated that the understanding was that the college would assume the mortgage then on the property.
The building involved consists of three stories and a basement, containing eighteen rooms. Dr. and Mrs. Robinson occupy the four rooms on the third floor. The bursar and his wife occupy a room in the basement. The remaining thirteen rooms are used exclusively for school purposes. Since its founding, the college has never operated at a profit and the total receipts for the school year 1940-1941 amount to $23,699.78 and disbursements over the same period total $20,806.89. The president receives a salary of.. $1,200 a year; the secretary a salary of $25 a month in addition to their living quarters mentioned above. There were no scholarships on the assessment date, nor does the evidence disclose to what extent scholarships have been provided in the past. The salaries of the president and registrar are undoubtedly low, but Mrs. Robinson testified that any increase in receipts would probably he utilized to increase the salaries of the faculty and the president.
It is settled beyond question that statutes granting exemption are to be construed most strongly against those claiming thereunder; that a college must establish that it is fundamentally a charitable institution and that the proofs to that end must be free from fair doubt. City of Trenton v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 127 N. J. L. 105; affirmed, sub nom. Trenton v. Rider College, 128 Id. 320.
We find that prosecutor has failed to sustain the burden of proving its right to exemption. The writ is dismissed, with costs.