Case Name: Darryl EL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MAX DAETWYLER CORPORATION; Don Bergholz; Walter Siegenthaler, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-10-20
Citations: 451 F. App'x 257
Docket Number: No. 11-1555
Parties: Darryl EL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MAX DAETWYLER CORPORATION; Don Bergholz; Walter Siegenthaler, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 451
Pages: 257–258

Head Matter:
Darryl EL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MAX DAETWYLER CORPORATION; Don Bergholz; Walter Siegenthaler, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 11-1555.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 18, 2011.
Decided: Oct. 20, 2011.
Darryl El, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Pearson Holderness, Robinson, Bradshaw & Hinson, PA, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Darryl El appeals the district court's order dismissing his action filed under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. § 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2003 & Supp.2011). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. El v. Max Daetwyler Corp., No. 3:09-cv-00415-MOC-DCK, 2011 WL 1769805 (W.D.N.C. May 9, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.