Case Name: Louis HURWITZ, Trading as United Postcard Supply Company, Appellant, v. J. Frank MEYER, Trading as the Exhibit Supply Company, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1926-02-23
Citations: 10 F.2d 1019
Docket Number: No. 3371
Parties: Louis HURWITZ, Trading as United Postcard Supply Company, Appellant, v. J. Frank MEYER, Trading as the Exhibit Supply Company, Appellee.
Judges: Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 10
Pages: 1019–1019

Head Matter:
Louis HURWITZ, Trading as United Postcard Supply Company, Appellant, v. J. Frank MEYER, Trading as the Exhibit Supply Company, Appellee.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
February 23, 1926.)
No. 3371.
For opinion below, see 5 F.(2d) 370.
Thomas C. Egan, John M. Patterson, and Wolf, Patterson, Block & Schorr, all of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.
Kennard N. Ware, Charles H. Howson, Howson & Howson, and Robert T. McCracken, all of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee.
Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
On presentation of affidavits and after hearing the parties, the court below granted a preliminary injunction, the effect of which is to preserve the status in quo and prevent any further alleged injury to the plaintiff's current business. After due consideration had, we find no ground for convicting the court of error in so doing, as it has, in its opinion, sufficiently vindicated its present action at this stage of the case.
The appeal is therefore dismissed, at the appellant's cost.