Case Name: Thomas Wilson BEAUMONT, III, House of Beaumont, Beneficiary, Pre-1861 private American Citizen of the United States of America, the de jure Republic, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH STATE BANK; Unknown Trustees 1-10, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-03-22
Citations: 641 F. App'x 282
Docket Number: No. 16-1071
Parties: Thomas Wilson BEAUMONT, III, House of Beaumont, Beneficiary, Pre-1861 private American Citizen of the United States of America, the de jure Republic, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH STATE BANK; Unknown Trustees 1-10, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 641
Pages: 282–282

Head Matter:
Thomas Wilson BEAUMONT, III, House of Beaumont, Beneficiary, Pre-1861 private American Citizen of the United States of America, the de jure Republic, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH STATE BANK; Unknown Trustees 1-10, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-1071.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 17, 2016.
Decided: March 22, 2016.
Thomas Wilson Beaumont, III, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Thomas Wilson Beaumont, III, appeals the district court's January 11, 2016, order dismissing as moot his self-styled revised bill in equity and petition for a temporary restraining order and denying his self-styled petition to seal and proceed ex parte. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Beaumont v. S. State Bank, No. 9:15-mc-00385-CWH-MGB (D.S.C. Jan. 11, 2016) We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.