Case Name: Ronald A. Mulzac et al., Respondents, v. Gnesin Roman, Appellant, et al., Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2000-10-23
Citations: 276 A.D.2d 679
Docket Number: 
Parties: Ronald A. Mulzac et al., Respondents, v Gnesin Roman, Appellant, et al., Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 276
Pages: 679–679

Head Matter:
Ronald A. Mulzac et al., Respondents, v Gnesin Roman, Appellant, et al., Defendant.
[716 NYS2d 319]

Opinion:
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Gnesin Roman appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dabiri, J.), dated October 21, 1999, as denied his motion, in effect, pursuant to CPLR 3215 (c) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against him.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the motion of the defendant Gnesin Roman, in effect, pursuant to CPLR 3215 (c), to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against him, as good cause was shown for the plaintiffs' delay in entering a judgment. Bracken, J. P., Santucci, Altman and Florio, JJ., concur.