Case Name: Steve Anthony DONALD, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-04-20
Citations: 755 So. 2d 816
Docket Number: No. 1D00-1005
Parties: Steve Anthony DONALD, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: BARFIELD, C.J., VAN NORTWICK and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 755
Pages: 816–816

Head Matter:
Steve Anthony DONALD, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 1D00-1005.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
April 20, 2000.
Steve Anthony Donald, pro se, petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Steve Anthony Donald petitions this court for a writ of mandamus, complaining of certain actions or omissions on the part of the trial judge and defense counsel in his criminal prosecution. We find that direct appeal and a motion for postconviction relief serve as adequate legal remedies to correct any of the described errors. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Hall v. Key, 476 So.2d 787 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).
BARFIELD, C.J., VAN NORTWICK and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.