Case Name: David E. HENDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bridget R. MUGANE, Attorney at Law, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-11-18
Citations: 300 F. App'x 212
Docket Number: No. 08-1867
Parties: David E. HENDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bridget R. MUGANE, Attorney at Law, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 300
Pages: 212–212

Head Matter:
David E. HENDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bridget R. MUGANE, Attorney at Law, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 08-1867.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 13, 2008.
Decided: Nov. 18, 2008.
David E. Henderson, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
David E. Henderson appeals the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his complaint against Defendant summarily asserting, in part, that since 1983 Defendant has refused to assist him in obtaining medical retirement or reemployment with the United States Foreign Service. Because Henderson may amend his complaint to cure the pleading defects identified by the district court, we find that the dismissal order is interlocutory and not appeal-able. See Chao v. Rivendell Woods, Inc., 415 F.3d 342, 345 (4th Cir.2005); Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.