Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Charles FRAZIER, Appellant; Charles FRAZIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1996-03-05
Citations: 920 S.W.2d 107
Docket Number: Nos. 64907, 67474
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Charles FRAZIER, Appellant. Charles FRAZIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before CRAHAN, P.J., and CRANDALL and DOWD, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 920
Pages: 107–107

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Charles FRAZIER, Appellant. Charles FRAZIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 64907, 67474.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
March 5, 1996.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 11, 1996.
N. Scott Rosenblum, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., David G. Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before CRAHAN, P.J., and CRANDALL and DOWD, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals the judgment upon his conviction by a jury of one count of possession of a controlled substance, § 195.202, RSMo 1992, one count of delivery of a controlled substance, § 195.211, RSMo 1992, and one count of resisting arrest, § 575.150, RSMo 1992, for which he was sentenced to concurrent terms of fifteen, fifteen and ten years imprisonment respectively. Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evi-dentiary hearing. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgments are affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).