Case Name: In the MATTER OF the ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL ETHICS JOINT OPINION 732, the Committee on Attorney Advertising Joint Opinion 44, and the Committee on the Unauthorized Practice of Law Joint Opinion 54. (Consumers for a Responsive Legal System- Petitioner)
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 2018-06-01
Citations: 185 A.3d 866
Docket Number: R–19 September Term 2017; 079852
Parties: In the MATTER OF the ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL ETHICS JOINT OPINION 732, the Committee on Attorney Advertising Joint Opinion 44, and the Committee on the Unauthorized Practice of Law Joint Opinion 54.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 185
Pages: 866–866

Head Matter:
In the MATTER OF the ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL ETHICS JOINT OPINION 732, the Committee on Attorney Advertising Joint Opinion 44, and the Committee on the Unauthorized Practice of Law Joint Opinion 54.
(Consumers for a Responsive Legal System- Petitioner)
R-19 September Term 2017
079852
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
June 1, 2018
ORDER

Opinion:
It is ORDERED that the petition for review is denied.