Case Name: Lascelles Albert HINES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1988-08-24
Citations: 529 So. 2d 1272
Docket Number: No. 86-2953
Parties: Lascelles Albert HINES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and FRANK and HALL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 529
Pages: 1272–1272

Head Matter:
Lascelles Albert HINES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 86-2953.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Aug. 24, 1988.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and D.P. Chanco, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Kim W. Munch, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellant, Lascelles Albert Hines, appeals from the denial of his motion for leave to withdraw plea of nolo contendere and to vacate judgment and sentence.
We have considered each aspect of this appeal and find only one claim meritorious. The appellant asserts, and the state concedes, that the appellant pleaded to an offense which is not a crime in Florida: conspiracy to attempt to possess cannabis with intent to sell.
This matter is therefore remanded to the trial court with instructions to vacate the judgment and sentence on Count I. In all other aspects the denial of the appellant's motions is affirmed.
SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and FRANK and HALL, JJ., concur.