Case Name: Jimmie ECHOLS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SHERIFF OF BERTIE COUNTY, Defendant-Appellee, and Sheriff of Bertie; Office of Sheriff of Bertie; Delegates of Sheriff of Bertie Involved; Sheriff of Bertie, as Respondeat Superior; Sheriff John Holly, in capacity; Sheriff John Holley, as individual; Surety Bond; Insurer(s); Malefactors, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-03-16
Citations: 638 F. App'x 242
Docket Number: No. 15-2324
Parties: Jimmie ECHOLS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SHERIFF OF BERTIE COUNTY, Defendant-Appellee, and Sheriff of Bertie; Office of Sheriff of Bertie; Delegates of Sheriff of Bertie Involved; Sheriff of Bertie, as Respondeat Superior; Sheriff John Holly, in capacity; Sheriff John Holley, as individual; Surety Bond; Insurer(s); Malefactors, Defendants.
Judges: Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 638
Pages: 242–243

Head Matter:
Jimmie ECHOLS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SHERIFF OF BERTIE COUNTY, Defendant-Appellee, and Sheriff of Bertie; Office of Sheriff of Bertie; Delegates of Sheriff of Bertie Involved; Sheriff of Bertie, as Respondeat Superior; Sheriff John Holly, in capacity; Sheriff John Holley, as individual; Surety Bond; Insurer(s); Malefactors, Defendants.
No. 15-2324.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 25, 2016.
Decided: March 16, 2016.
Jimmie Echols, Appellant Pro Se. Lloyd Clifton Smith, III, Pritchett & Burch PLLC, Windsor, North Carolina, for Ap-pellee.
Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jimmie Echols appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil action as barred by the doctrine of res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Echols v. Sheriff of Bertie Cnty., No. 2:14-ev-00033-FL, 2015 WL 5725513 (E.D.N.C. filed Sept. 30, 2015; entered Oct. 1, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.