Case Name: UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Perry PAULDING, Relator, v. Vincent R. MANCUSI, Warden, Attica State Prison, Attica, New York, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1966-11-03
Citations: 378 F.2d 368
Docket Number: No. MR 714
Parties: UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Perry PAULDING, Relator, v. Vincent R. MANCUSI, Warden, Attica State Prison, Attica, New York, Respondent.
Judges: Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and MOORE and KAUFMAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 378
Pages: 368–368

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Perry PAULDING, Relator, v. Vincent R. MANCUSI, Warden, Attica State Prison, Attica, New York, Respondent.
No. MR 714.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Nov. 3, 1966.
Perry Paulding, in pro. per.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. for State of New York, New York City, opposed the motion on behalf of respondent, Vincent Mancusi, Attica, N. Y.
Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and MOORE and KAUFMAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We deny the motions and dismiss the petition, without prejudice to petitioner's right to renew his petition in the district court should appropriate proceedings for the relief herein sought be denied in the New York State courts. United States ex rel. Martin v. McMann, 348 F.2d 896 (2 Cir. 1965); United States ex rel. Bagley v. LaVallee, 332 F.2d 890, 892 (2 Cir. 1964). In light of People ex rel. Keitt v. McMann, 18 N.Y.2d 257, 273 N.Y.S.2d 897, 220 N.E.2d 653 (1966), the broadened scope of habeas corpus in New York makes it appropriate for the petitioner to seek whatever remedy he may have in such a proceeding in the first instance.