Case Name: ROWLETTE, Appellant, v. FOSTER et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Common Pleas
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1893-05-02
Citations: 25 N.Y.S. 1137
Docket Number: 
Parties: ROWLETTE, Appellant, v. FOSTER et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 25
Pages: 1137–1137

Head Matter:
ROWLETTE, Appellant, v. FOSTER et al., Respondents.
(Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.
May 2, 1893.)
Action by Thomas M. Rowlette against Roger Foster and others.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have taken the case into consideration, and, after investigation, have concluded that the defendants in this action were estopped from. setting up the counterclaim which they did, and therefore that tin* judgment should be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide the event.