Case Name: James HODGES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-10-31
Citations: 30 S.W.3d 250
Docket Number: No. ED 77188
Parties: James HODGES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, Jr., and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 30
Pages: 250–251

Head Matter:
James HODGES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 77188.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Oct. 31, 2000.
Mary S. Choi, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Karen Pope Butler, Asst. Public Defender, Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, Jr., and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
James Hodges (Movant) appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without a hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).