Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John William BULLOCK et al., Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1972-05-01
Citations: 458 F.2d 37
Docket Number: No. 71-3470
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John William BULLOCK et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 458
Pages: 37–37

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John William BULLOCK et al., Defendants-Appellants.
No. 71-3470
Summary Calendar.*
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
May 1, 1972.
Before BELL, DYER and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed. See Local Rule 21.
. Appellant contended that: 1) the evidence was insufficient for the jury to have inferred the existence of an unlawful agreement; 2) there was improper venue and a lack of jurisdiction; 3) the charge did not sufficiently instruct the jury to consider each defendant separately; and 4) a preliminary instruction to the jury that once there is some evidence of conspiracy, hearsay of co-conspirators may be admissible, amounted to an instruction, as a matter of law, that there was evidence of a conspiracy. We have considered all these specifications of error and find them to be without merit.
. See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 430 F.2d 966 (5 Cir. 1970).