Case Name: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Kim HIGGINS, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-09-16
Citations: 623 So. 2d 1190
Docket Number: No. 81262
Parties: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Kim HIGGINS, Respondent.
Judges: BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 623
Pages: 1190–1190

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Kim HIGGINS, Respondent.
No. 81262.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Sept. 16, 1993.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and James W. Rogers, Bureau Chief and Amelia L. Beisner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for petitioner.
John C. Harrison of John C. Harrison, P.A., Shalimar, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We review Higgins v. State, 611 So.2d 604 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993), based on a certified question. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We answered the question in State v. Rucker, 613 So.2d 460 (Fla.1993). We quash the decision under review and remand the case for proceedings consistent with our opinion in Rucker.
It is so ordered.
BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.