Case Name: In re Monta Olander JORDAN, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-02-21
Citations: 510 F. App'x 274
Docket Number: No. 12-2378
Parties: In re Monta Olander JORDAN, Petitioner.
Judges: Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 510
Pages: 274–274

Head Matter:
In re Monta Olander JORDAN, Petitioner.
No. 12-2378.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 11, 2013.
Decided: Feb. 21, 2013.
Monta Olander Jordan, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Monta Olander Jordan petitions for a writ of mandamus, seeking an order directing the district court to amend its order reducing his sentence from ninety-six to fifty-seven months to delete a provision referencing U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 1B1.10(b)(2)(C). We deny the petition.
Mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402, 96 S.Ct. 2119, 48 L.Ed.2d 725 (1976); United States v. Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir.2003). Mandamus is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought, In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir.1988), and may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re Lockheed Martin Corp., 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir.2007).
The relief sought by Jordan is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, while we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We deny the motion to expedite and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.