Case Name: Raymond SCHOLTES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2010-02-03
Citations: 27 So. 3d 175
Docket Number: No. 4D07-3690
Parties: Raymond SCHOLTES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: GROSS, C.J., STEVENSON and LEVINE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 27
Pages: 175–176

Head Matter:
Raymond SCHOLTES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D07-3690.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb. 3, 2010.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Alan T. Lipson, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, and Raymond Scholtes, Crestview, for appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mark J. Hamel, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for ap-pellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979). In this appeal pursuant to Anders, Appellant's pro se brief raises issues of an involuntary plea which were not preserved for appeal by the filing of a motion to withdraw his plea. This affirmance is without prejudice to Appellant's right to assert such issues in a timely and sufficient rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief.
GROSS, C.J., STEVENSON and LEVINE, JJ., concur.
. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).