Case Name: W. H. Bolen, Respondent, v. F. W. Llewellyn, Appellant
Court: Washington Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Washington
Decision Date: 1911-11-14
Citations: 65 Wash. 701
Docket Number: No. 9643
Parties: W. H. Bolen, Respondent, v. F. W. Llewellyn, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Washington Reports
Volume: 65
Pages: 701–701

Head Matter:
[No. 9643.
Department One.
November 14, 1911.]
W. H. Bolen, Respondent, v. F. W. Llewellyn, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of tbe superior court for King county, Ronald, J„ entered February 25, 1911, upon findings in favor of tbe plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before tbe court without a jury, in an action on contract.
Affirmed.
Fred Llewellyn, pro se.
Douglas, Lane & Douglas (W. H. Bolen, of counsel), for respondent.
Reported in 118 Pac. 1118.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
— This was an action to recover damages for tbe breach of an alleged contract of employment. Tbe case was tried to tbe court without a jury. Tbe court found upon tbe evidence that a definite contract bad been entered into between tbe parties and breached by tbe defendant. A judgment for $300 damages was entered for tbe plaintiff. Tbe defendant has appealed.
Tbe only question presented here, as below, is one of fact, and is whether a definite contract was entered into. We have carefully read tbe record and are not convinced that tbe trial court was in error. A review of tbe evidence is unnecessary.
judgment affirmed.