Case Name: William Bates III et al. v. Hugh Whittle
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1973-11-14
Citations: 165 Conn. 442
Docket Number: 
Parties: William Bates III et al. v. Hugh Whittle
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 165
Pages: 442–442

Head Matter:
William Bates III et al. v. Hugh Whittle
House, O. J., Shapiro, Loiselle, MacDonald and Bogdanski, Js.
Argued November 7
decided November 14, 1973
Francis Carling, for the appellant (defendant).
John T. Cummiskey, Jr., for the appellees (named plaintiff et al.).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The question on this appeal involves issues of fact, and the judgment was a result reasonably reached on a permissible view of the evidence. Anderson v. D'Addario, 158 Conn. 616, 262 A.2d 187.
There is no error.