Case Name: DONNA VEDUTIS, AN INFANT BY HER GUARDIAN AD LITEM, ROBERT VEDUTIS AND ROBERT VEDUTIS, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. SOUTH PLAINFIELD BOARD OF EDUCATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1976-06-15
Citations: 142 N.J. Super. 492
Docket Number: 
Parties: DONNA VEDUTIS, AN INFANT BY HER GUARDIAN AD LITEM, ROBERT VEDUTIS AND ROBERT VEDUTIS, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. SOUTH PLAINFIELD BOARD OF EDUCATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 142
Pages: 492–493

Head Matter:
DONNA VEDUTIS, AN INFANT BY HER GUARDIAN AD LITEM, ROBERT VEDUTIS AND ROBERT VEDUTIS, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. SOUTH PLAINFIELD BOARD OF EDUCATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Submitted June 7, 1976
Decided June 15, 1976.
Before Judges Kole, Ard and E. Gaulkin.
Mr. Robert F. Colquhoun, attorney for the appellant.
Messrs. Mulligan & Altman, attorneys for the respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment of the Law Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Demos, which was approved in Rost v. Fair Lawn Bd. of Ed., 137 N. J. Super. 76 (App. Div. 1975).
In view of our disposition of the matter, we need not consider the issue of informal or substantial compliance which was also raised on this appeal.
Affirmed.