Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Melba Noely LAZO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-10-05
Citations: 396 F. App'x 914
Docket Number: No. 10-6710
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Melba Noely LAZO, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 396
Pages: 914–914

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Melba Noely LAZO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-6710.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 28, 2010.
Decided: Oct. 5, 2010.
Melba Noely Lazo, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Joseph Grooms, III, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Melba Noely Lazo appeals the district court's order denying her "Reconsideration motion to reduce sentence minor participation." We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lazo, No. 1:08-cr00126-LMB-2 (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 22, 2010; entered Apr. 23, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.