Case Name: James R. NICHOLS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-01-05
Citations: 554 So. 2d 669
Docket Number: No. 89-00181
Parties: James R. NICHOLS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 554
Pages: 669–669

Head Matter:
James R. NICHOLS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 89-00181.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Jan. 5, 1990.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Allyn Giambalvo, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Wendy Buffington, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the defendant's judgments and sentences for two separate acts, sale of cocaine and possession of cocaine. The trial court correctly enhanced the sentence under the habitual offender statute and made the necessary findings on the record. § 775.084, Fla.Stat. (1987). On remand, however, each sentence shall be clerically corrected to reflect that the defendant was sentenced under the special provisions for habitual offenders.
SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.