Case Name: Kate I. UWASOMBA, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Judith Uwasomba; Sarah Uwasomba, Plaintiffs, v. Clyde D. Jett, in individual and official capacity; Central Transport Incorporated; Douglas A. Lines, PC, attorney; Donaldson & Black Incorporation; Aronberg Goldgehn & Garmisa, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-02-25
Citations: 510 F. App'x 292
Docket Number: No. 12-2253
Parties: Kate I. UWASOMBA, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Judith Uwasomba; Sarah Uwasomba, Plaintiffs, v. Clyde D. Jett, in individual and official capacity; Central Transport Incorporated; Douglas A. Lines, PC, attorney; Donaldson & Black Incorporation; Aronberg Goldgehn & Garmisa, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before AGEE and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 510
Pages: 292–293

Head Matter:
Kate I. UWASOMBA, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Judith Uwasomba; Sarah Uwasomba, Plaintiffs, v. Clyde D. Jett, in individual and official capacity; Central Transport Incorporated; Douglas A. Lines, PC, attorney; Donaldson & Black Incorporation; Aronberg Goldgehn & Garmisa, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 12-2253.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 21, 2013.
Decided: Feb. 25, 2013.
Kate I. Uwasomba, Appellant Pro Se. Cynthia Lee Santoni, Wilson, Elser, Mos-kowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP, McLean, Virginia; Ronald Paul Herbert, Herbert & Satterwhite PC, Richmond, Virginia; An-nemarie DiNardo Cleary, Douglas P. Rucker, Jr., Sands Anderson, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before AGEE and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kate I. Uwasomba appeals the district court's order denying reconsideration of its order denying her Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion for relief from its order dismissing her civil complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Uwasomba leave to proceed in forma pau-peris and affirm the district court's order. Uwasomba v. Jett, 3:12-cv-00213-HEW (E.D.Va. Sept. 21, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.