Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Aaron Vince SILAS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-06-02
Citations: 692 F. App'x 396
Docket Number: No. 16-10174
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Aaron Vince SILAS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 692
Pages: 396–397

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Aaron Vince SILAS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-10174
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 31, 2017
Filed June 02, 2017
Krissa Marie Lanham, USPX—Office of the US Attorney, Two Renaissance Square, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Eric W. Kessler, Kessler Law Offices, Mesa, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant
Aaron Vince Silas, Pro Se
Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P, 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Aaron Vince Silas appeals from the district court's judgment and challenges his 84-month sentence for aggravated sexual assault, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1153, 2241(a)(1), and 2246. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Silas's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Silas the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Silas has waived his right to appeal. Because the record discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the appeal waiver, we dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009).
Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.