Case Name: Marie Napoli, an Infant, by Her Mother and Natural Guardian, Vita Napoli, et al., Respondents, v. Peter Takacs et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1997-02-10
Citations: 236 A.D.2d 455
Docket Number: 
Parties: Marie Napoli, an Infant, by Her Mother and Natural Guardian, Vita Napoli, et al., Respondents, v Peter Takacs et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 236
Pages: 455–455

Head Matter:
Marie Napoli, an Infant, by Her Mother and Natural Guardian, Vita Napoli, et al., Respondents, v Peter Takacs et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.
[654 NYS2d 594]

Opinion:
—In a medical malpractice action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Peter Takacs and Syosset Community Hospital appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Tanenbaum, J.), dated August 18, 1995, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against them.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
There are issues of fact which preclude the granting of summary judgment (see, e.g., Almodovar v Methodist Hosp., 222 AD2d 630). The appellants' remaining contention is not properly before us, and, in any event, is without merit (see, Daly v Messina, 228 AD2d 542; Fuller v Preis, 35 NY2d 425; Humphrey v Jewish Hosp. & Med. Ctr., 172 AD2d 494). Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Pizzuto and Goldstein, JJ., concur.