Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Pompilio MENDEZ-DIAZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-05-03
Citations: 470 F. App'x 350
Docket Number: No. 11-40511
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Pompilio MENDEZ-DIAZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 470
Pages: 350–351

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Pompilio MENDEZ-DIAZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-40511
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
May 3, 2012.
Jeffery Alan Babcock, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Joe Alfred Flores, I, Esq., Corpus Christi, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Pompilio Mendez-Diaz appeals the sentence of 56-months' imprisonment imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to transport illegal aliens within the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(l)(A)(ii), 1324(a)(l)(A)(v)(I), and 1324(a) (1) (B) (i). Mendez contends his guilty plea was not knowingly and voluntarily entered because he was not aware that his offense level for the advisory Sentencing Guidelines would be increased based on: his creating a risk of serious injury (to border patrol agents who apprehended Mendez and his group of illegal aliens); and his causing a serious injury (for raping a member of the alien group). He also contends his sentence was unreasonable because of these upward adjustments. The Government counters that Mendez' appeal is barred because, in his plea agreement, he waived the right to appeal his sentence.
The plain language of Mendez' plea agreement confirms that he waived the right to pursue this appeal, and our review of the rearraignment proceedings confirms that the waiver was knowing and voluntary. See, e.g., United States v. Bond, 414 F.3d 542, 544 (5th Cir.2005) (two-step inquiry for waiver of appeal).
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.