Case Name: James FORNEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2018-02-28
Citations: 238 So. 3d 839
Docket Number: No. 4D17–3854
Parties: James FORNEY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 238
Pages: 839–839

Head Matter:
James FORNEY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D17-3854
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
[February 28, 2018]
James Forney, Raiford, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We affirm the summary denial of appellant's successive rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. We write only to address appellant's claim that the orders entered after he filed a motion to disqualify the trial judge were void. This claim is meritless because appellant failed to serve the motion on the judge. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(c), (j) ; Braddy v. State , 111 So.3d 810, 833 (Fla. 2012) ; Hedrick v. State , 6 So.3d 688, 693 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).
Affirmed .
Warner, Ciklin and Kuntz, JJ., concur.