Case Name: Milton S. LUBARR, D. D. S., Appellant, v. Samuel WALDMAN et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1968-07-30
Citations: 212 So. 2d 664
Docket Number: No. 67-980
Parties: Milton S. LUBARR, D. D. S., Appellant, v. Samuel WALDMAN et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 212
Pages: 664–665

Head Matter:
Milton S. LUBARR, D. D. S., Appellant, v. Samuel WALDMAN et al., Appellees.
No. 67-980.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
July 30, 1968.
Talianoff, Waller & Berger, Miami Beach, for appellant.
Tobias Simon and Beverly Gurevitz, Miami, for appellees.
Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have carefully reviewed the record on appeal and considered the briefs and arguments of counsel. We have concluded therefrom that, notwithstanding the court's failure to consider the evidence in the light of § 55.56, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., then in effect, defendant's evidence was sufficient to support the court's finding in his favor. State Plant Board v. Smith, Fla.1959, 110 So.2d 401; Richards v. Samuel, Fla.App.1966, 184 So.2d 516. We further hold that appellant's remaining points are without substantial merit. Central Hardware Co. v. Stampler, Fla.App.1965, 180 So.2d 205.
No harmful error having been made to appear, the judgment appealed is affirmed.
Affirmed.
. Section 56.29(6), Fla.Stat., F.S.A., 1967 Revision.