Case Name: Emil Schultz, Jr., et al., respondents, v. Howard J. Van Doren et al., appellants
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1903-08-25
Citations: 65 N.J. Eq. 764
Docket Number: 
Parties: Emil Schultz, Jr., et al., respondents, v. Howard J. Van Doren et al., appellants.
Judges: For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Van Syokel, Dixon, Garrison, Port, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Voori-iees, Vroom, Green- — 13.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 65
Pages: 764–765

Head Matter:
Emil Schultz, Jr., et al., respondents, v. Howard J. Van Doren et al., appellants.
[Filed August 25th, 1903.]
Mr. Robert E. McCarter, for the appellants.
Mr. Edward A. Day, for the respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from in this case is affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Pitney, filed in the court of chancery, and reported in 19 Dick. Ch. Rep. 465.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Van Syokel, Dixon, Garrison, Port, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Voori-iees, Vroom, Green- — 13.
For reversal — None.