Case Name: Joy Maxwell CARR, Petitioner, v. Marion James GRAY, Jr., a/k/a Marion James Gray, Bud Gray, and M.M. Gray, Jr., Respondents
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-12-04
Citations: 573 So. 2d 874
Docket Number: No. 90-2194
Parties: Joy Maxwell CARR, Petitioner, v. Marion James GRAY, Jr., a/k/a Marion James Gray, Bud Gray, and M.M. Gray, Jr., Respondents.
Judges: Before JORGENSON, LEVY, and GODERICH, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 573
Pages: 874–875

Head Matter:
Joy Maxwell CARR, Petitioner, v. Marion James GRAY, Jr., a/k/a Marion James Gray, Bud Gray, and M.M. Gray, Jr., Respondents.
No. 90-2194.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 4, 1990.
Joseph P. Averill, Miami, for petitioner.
Shutts & Bowen and Phillip G. New-comm, William McBrayer Wood, Raymond E. Badini, Floyd, Pearson, Richman, Greer, Weil, Brumbaugh & Russomanno and Charles H. Johnson and Michele A. Maraci-ni, Miami, Mark A. Neumaier, Tampa, for respondents.
Before JORGENSON, LEVY, and GODERICH, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Attorney Joy Carr petitions for a writ of common law certiorari seeking review of an order denying her motion for protective order and motion to quash a subpoena duc-es tecum in a guardianship proceeding. The underlying proceeding in which this discovery was sought is the subject of a companion Petition for Writ of Common Law Certiorari, Case Nos. 90-1425 and 90-2281.
We deny the petition without prejudice for petitioner to reassert the points raised in her petition should the need arise later in the guardianship proceedings.
Petition denied.