Case Name: Flora Pohalski, Appellant, v. James Ectheiler et al., Respondents
Court: New York City Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1896-01
Citations: 15 Misc. 695
Docket Number: 
Parties: Flora Pohalski, Appellant, v. James Ectheiler et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 15
Pages: 695–695

Head Matter:
Flora Pohalski, Appellant, v. James Ectheiler et al., Respondents.
Appeal from judgment in favor of defendants.
S. L. Samuels, for appellant.
Otto Irving Wise, for respondents.

Opinion:
McCarthy, J.
We have examined this case very carefully:' There seems to have been some misunderstanding as to whether or not the plaintiff waives the introduction in evidence of the affidavit and warrant of attachment under-which the levy was made and under which the defendants; justified.
In order that justice may be done and that an application-may be made to the next General Term to correct the sainé, we think it fair and proper to direct a reargument, when the; - whole case can be presented and argued.
So ordered.
Botty, J., concurs.
Reargument ordered.