Case Name: In the Interest of L.S., a minor. H.S., Appellant, v. Juvenile Officer of St. Louis County, Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-10-19
Citations: 4 S.W.3d 609
Docket Number: No. ED 75405
Parties: In the Interest of L.S., a minor. H.S., Appellant, v. Juvenile Officer of St. Louis County, Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before RHODES RUSSELL, C.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and CHARLES B. BLACKMAR, S.J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 4
Pages: 609–609

Head Matter:
In the Interest of L.S., a minor. H.S., Appellant, v. Juvenile Officer of St. Louis County, Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 75405.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Oct. 19, 1999.
John R. Bird, St. Louis, for appellant.
Cynthia Harcourt-Hearing, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before RHODES RUSSELL, C.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and CHARLES B. BLACKMAR, S.J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant appeals the decision of the trial court terminating his parental rights. We find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).