Case Name: KENNETH SHIBLEY, Petitioner, v. HAROLD H. HART, Respondent
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1931-01-06
Citations: 110 Cal. App. 759
Docket Number: Civ. No. 7348
Parties: KENNETH SHIBLEY, Petitioner, v. HAROLD H. HART, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports
Volume: 110
Pages: 759–760

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 7348.
First Appellate District, Division Two.
January 6, 1931.]
KENNETH SHIBLEY, Petitioner, v. HAROLD H. HART, Respondent.
Milton T. U’Ren for Petitioner.
No appearance for Respondent.

Opinion:
THE COURT.
An application for a writ of mandamus in the above-entitled matter was filed February 6, 1930, and an alternative writ of mandate was granted and made returnable for March 10, 1930. No showing was made on that day, and since that date numerous continuances have been granted upon the request of the petitioner, but to this date the petitioner has failed to appear and has failed to make any showing why a peremptory writ should issue.
It is therefore ordered that for lack of prosecution the proceedings are dismissed and the alternative writ is discharged.
A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on February 4, 1931.