Case Name: Johnny L. MILLIGAN, individually and on behalf of I.L.M. (minor) and I.L.M. (minor); Carolyn A. Milligan, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. W & M PROPERTIES, INCORPORATED of Virginia, d/b/a Merrifield Village Apartment Company; Andrew Greenleaf Lawrence, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-10-20
Citations: 145 F. App'x 839
Docket Number: No. 05-1494
Parties: Johnny L. MILLIGAN, individually and on behalf of I.L.M. (minor) and I.L.M. (minor); Carolyn A. Milligan, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. W & M PROPERTIES, INCORPORATED of Virginia, d/b/a Merrifield Village Apartment Company; Andrew Greenleaf Lawrence, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 145
Pages: 839–839

Head Matter:
Johnny L. MILLIGAN, individually and on behalf of I.L.M. (minor) and I.L.M. (minor); Carolyn A. Milligan, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. W & M PROPERTIES, INCORPORATED of Virginia, d/b/a Merrifield Village Apartment Company; Andrew Greenleaf Lawrence, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 05-1494.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 30, 2005.
Decided Oct. 20, 2005.
Johnny L. Milligan, Carolyn A. Milligan, Appellants Pro Se. Jennifer Ann Guy, John David Wilburn, McGuirewoods, LLP, McLean, Virginia, for Appellee W & M Properties; Andrew Greenleaf Lawrence, Fairfax, Virginia, Appellee Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appellants appeal the district court's order dismissing their second amended complaint alleging violations of the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3601-3619 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Milligan v. W & M Prop., Inc., No. CA-04-1517 (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 25, 2005 & entered Apr. 26, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED