Case Name: Ernest V. Dunlevie, Appellant, v. Justin W. Spangenberg, Defendant, and John R. Droney, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1914-06-02
Citations: 211 N.Y. 576
Docket Number: 
Parties: Ernest V. Dunlevie, Appellant, v. Justin W. Spangenberg, Defendant, and John R. Droney, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 211
Pages: 576–576

Head Matter:
Ernest V. Dunlevie, Appellant, v. Justin W. Spangenberg, Defendant, and John R. Droney, Respondent.
Dunlevie.v. Droney, 149 App. Div. 930, affirmed.
(Argued May 5, 1914;
decided June 2, 1914.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered March 18, 1912, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court at Trial Term without a jury in an action to recover for an alleged breach of contract of sale.
Plaintiff complained that the damages allowed were inadequate.
James McCormick Mitchell for appellant.
Adelbert Moot and Allen J. Hastings for respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Werner, His-cock, Collin, Ouddeback, Miller and Oardozo, JJ.