Case Name: Starsha SEWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John HOWARD, Sr., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-11-28
Citations: 671 F. App'x 50
Docket Number: No. 16-1758
Parties: Starsha SEWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John HOWARD, Sr., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 671
Pages: 50–50

Head Matter:
Starsha SEWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John HOWARD, Sr., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 16-1758
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: November 14, 2016
Decided: November 28, 2016
Starsha Sewell, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Starsha Sewell appeals the district court's orders returning documents to Se-well on the ground that the case is closed. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Howard, No. 8:12-cv-02736-JFM (D. Md. June 14 & 29, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED