Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos Alberto GONZALEZ-ROMERO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-06-12
Citations: 237 F. App'x 196
Docket Number: No. 06-30462
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos Alberto GONZALEZ-ROMERO, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: PREGERSON, FERGUSON, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 237
Pages: 196–196

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos Alberto GONZALEZ-ROMERO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-30462.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 4, 2007.
Filed June 12, 2007.
Michael S. Lahr, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Helena, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
L. Sanford Selvey, II, Esq., Selvey Law Firm, LLC, Billings, MT, for Defendants Appellant.
Before: PREGERSON, FERGUSON, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Defendant-Appellant Carlos Alberto Gonzalez-Romero appeals his conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
The issue before us is whether the district court erred when it instructed the jury regarding the voluntariness element of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Considering the instructions as a whole, the district court's error, if any, is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.