Case Name: Mike S. SCOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gary D. MAYNARD; J. Michael Stouffer; Mr. Miller; Mr. Durst; Mr. Rowley; Mr. Shearing; Mr. Graham; H. Thomas; Dr. Holwager, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-10-23
Citations: 347 F. App'x 961
Docket Number: No. 09-6023
Parties: Mike S. SCOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gary D. MAYNARD; J. Michael Stouffer; Mr. Miller; Mr. Durst; Mr. Rowley; Mr. Shearing; Mr. Graham; H. Thomas; Dr. Holwager, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 347
Pages: 961–962

Head Matter:
Mike S. SCOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gary D. MAYNARD; J. Michael Stouffer; Mr. Miller; Mr. Durst; Mr. Rowley; Mr. Shearing; Mr. Graham; H. Thomas; Dr. Holwager, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 09-6023.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 20, 2009.
Decided: Oct. 23, 2009.
Mike S. Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Mike S. Scott appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Scott v. Maynard, No. 8:07-cv-03080-AW (D.Md. Dec. 9, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.