Case Name: ABRAHAM RESNICK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. EAST BRUNSWICK TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, REFORM TEMPLE OF EAST BRUNSWICK, EAST BRUNSWICK BAPTIST CHURCH, NATIVITY EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF EAST BRUNSWICK, DEFENDANTS; ABRAHAM RESNICK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. REFORM TEMPLE OF EAST BRUNSWICK, DEFENDANTAPPELLANT, EAST BRUNSWICK TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION, EAST BRUNSWICK BAPTIST CHURCH, NATIVITY EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF EAST BRUNSWICK, DEFENDANTS
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1976-11-16
Citations: 144 N.J. Super. 474
Docket Number: 
Parties: ABRAHAM RESNICK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. EAST BRUNSWICK TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, REFORM TEMPLE OF EAST BRUNSWICK, EAST BRUNSWICK BAPTIST CHURCH, NATIVITY EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF EAST BRUNSWICK, DEFENDANTS. ABRAHAM RESNICK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. REFORM TEMPLE OF EAST BRUNSWICK, DEFENDANTAPPELLANT, EAST BRUNSWICK TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION, EAST BRUNSWICK BAPTIST CHURCH, NATIVITY EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF EAST BRUNSWICK, DEFENDANTS,
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 144
Pages: 474–475

Head Matter:
ABRAHAM RESNICK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. EAST BRUNSWICK TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, REFORM TEMPLE OF EAST BRUNSWICK, EAST BRUNSWICK BAPTIST CHURCH, NATIVITY EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF EAST BRUNSWICK, DEFENDANTS. ABRAHAM RESNICK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. REFORM TEMPLE OF EAST BRUNSWICK, DEFENDANTAPPELLANT, EAST BRUNSWICK TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION, EAST BRUNSWICK BAPTIST CHURCH, NATIVITY EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF EAST BRUNSWICK, DEFENDANTS,
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued November 1, 1976
Decided November 16, 1976.
Before Judges Bischoee, Moegan and Collesteb.
Mr. Frank J. Rubin argued the cause for Bast Brunswick Board of Education (Messrs. Rubin <& Lerner, attorneys).
Mr. Samuel H. Davis argued the cause for Reform Temple of East Brunswick (Messrs. D'ubowsky & Davis, attorneys).
Mr. Seymour Gelzer filed a brief and was permitted to argue the cause for East Brunswick Baptist Church, even though no notice of appeal was filed (Messrs. Iaria, and Gel-zer, attorneys).
Mr. Sanford Rader argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Eovacs, Anderson, Horowitz & Rader, attorneys).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the trial court, reported at 135 N. J. Super. 257.