Case Name: HAYMAN, Admx., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1945-05-28
Citations: 43 Ohio Law Abs. 598
Docket Number: No. 3804
Parties: HAYMAN, Admx., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: HORNBECK, P. J., GEIGER and MILLER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 43
Pages: 598–599

Head Matter:
HAYMAN, Admx., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
Ohio Appeals, Second District, Franklin County.
No. 3804.
Decided May 28, 1945.
Messrs. Burr, Porter, Stanley & Treffinger, Columbus, for defendant-appellee, and for the motion.
Messrs. Benoy, Saxby & Sebastian, Columbus, for plaintiff-appellant, and contra the motion.

Opinion:
OPINION
BY THE COURT:
Submitted on motion of the defendant-appellee to dis miss the appeal, because no assignment of errors as required by the Code and by Rule VII of the Rules of this Court, has been filed within the time prescribed by law and the claimed ground or grounds of error is or are not readily ascertainable from an examination of the record and the brief.
The motion will be overruled. We believe the question presented is readily ascertainable from the brief and the files in cause.
HORNBECK, P. J., GEIGER and MILLER, JJ., concur.