Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesus GALVAN-LOZANO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-06-21
Citations: 101 F. App'x 257
Docket Number: No. 03-10714; D.C. No. CR-03-00319-KJD
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesus GALVAN-LOZANO, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before LEAVY, THOMAS, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 101
Pages: 257–257

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesus GALVAN-LOZANO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 03-10714.
D.C. No. CR-03-00319-KJD.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 14, 2004.
Decided June 21, 2004.
Robert A. Bork, USLV-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Jason F. Carr, FPDNV-Federal Public Defender’s Office, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before LEAVY, THOMAS, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Jesus Galvan-Lozano appeals the 33-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to unlawful reentry of a deported alien in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Galvan-Lozano contends that under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), the district court denied Galvan-Lozano due process by imposing a sentence longer than 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a)'s two-year statutory maximum based on a prior conviction that was neither charged in the indictment nor admitted as part of the guilty plea. This contention, as Galvan-Lozano concedes, is foreclosed. United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411, 413-15 (9th Cir.2000).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
. Galvan-Lozano states that he presents this assignment of error to preserve the issue should subsequent Supreme Court alter the legal landscape.