Case Name: Jack JENNINGS, Petitioner, v. CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE CO., etc., Respondent; Jack JENNINGS, Petitioner, v. BEEMAN INVESTMENT COMPANY, etc., Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1966-04-13
Citations: 185 So. 2d 169
Docket Number: No. 34567
Parties: Jack JENNINGS, Petitioner, v. CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE CO., etc., Respondent. Jack JENNINGS, Petitioner, v. BEEMAN INVESTMENT COMPANY, etc., Respondent.
Judges: THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 185
Pages: 169–169

Head Matter:
Jack JENNINGS, Petitioner, v. CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE CO., etc., Respondent. Jack JENNINGS, Petitioner, v. BEEMAN INVESTMENT COMPANY, etc., Respondent.
No. 34567.
Supreme Court of Florida.
April 13, 1966.
Harlan Tuck, of Giles, Hedrick & Robinson, Orlando, for petitioner.
J. Thomas Gurney, of Gurney, Gurney & Plandley, Orlando, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.
It is so ordered.
THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.