Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Gregory ROBINSON, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-10-27
Citations: 979 S.W.2d 501
Docket Number: No. 73320
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Gregory ROBINSON, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before JAMES R. DOWD, P.J., and CRAHAN and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 979
Pages: 501–502

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Gregory ROBINSON, Defendant/Appellant.
No. 73320.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Oct. 27, 1998.
Douglas R. Hoff, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for defendant/appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff/respondent.
Before JAMES R. DOWD, P.J., and CRAHAN and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant Gregory Robinson appeals the judgment entered upon his conviction by a jury of one count of delivery of a controlled substance in violation of section 195.211 RSMo 1994. We affirm.
On appeal, defendant contends that it was plain error for the trial court to admit into evidence and play for the jury a taped conversation of the Street Corner Apprehension Team because the tape constituted hearsay and improperly bolstered Detective Anderson's account of the transaction. We have examined the briefs and the record on appeal. We find no manifest injustice. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would serve no precedential or jurisprudential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).