Case Name: Louis Eng, Respondent, v. Edward C. Tom et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1944-12-08
Citations: 268 A.D. 967
Docket Number: 
Parties: Louis Eng, Respondent, v. Edward C. Tom et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 268
Pages: 967–967

Head Matter:
Louis Eng, Respondent, v. Edward C. Tom et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Opinion:
— Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, J J.; Untermyer, J., concurs in the affirmance of the judgment on the ground that the statement complained of was made in the presence of the defendant Barber and that the jury could infer from his failure to deny it an admission of its accuracy. [See post, pp. 1027, 1039.]