Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David SANJURJO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-10-14
Citations: 346 F. App'x 965
Docket Number: No. 09-6590
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. David SANJURJO, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 346
Pages: 965–965

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. David SANJURJO, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 09-6590.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 31, 2009.
Decided: Oct. 14, 2009.
David Sanjurjo, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
David Sanjurjo appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Sanjurjo, No. 3:98-cr-00338-RLW-1 (E.D.Va. Mar. 12, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.