Case Name: Michael J. McCARTHY, Appellant, v. Seth A. MARMOR, Conrad J. DeSantis, Robert B. Cook, Russell J. Ferraro, Jr., and Terence P. McCarthy, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1997-04-09
Citations: 692 So. 2d 224
Docket Number: No. 96-1981
Parties: Michael J. McCARTHY, Appellant, v. Seth A. MARMOR, Conrad J. DeSantis, Robert B. Cook, Russell J. Ferraro, Jr., and Terence P. McCarthy, Appellees.
Judges: FARMER, STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 692
Pages: 224–225

Head Matter:
Michael J. McCARTHY, Appellant, v. Seth A. MARMOR, Conrad J. DeSantis, Robert B. Cook, Russell J. Ferraro, Jr., and Terence P. McCarthy, Appellees.
No. 96-1981.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
April 9, 1997.
Clarification Denied May 16, 1997.
Donald S. Rose, Miami, for appellant.
Timothy W. Gaskill of DeSantis, Gaskill, Smith & Shenkman, P.A, North Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The trial court's grant of summary judgment was correct, but not for the reason implicitly stated in the order. We conclude that the statute of limitations bars the claim in suit. Accordingly we affirm on the basis of Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979).
FARMER, STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur.