Case Name: William R. Petrillo v. Janice A. Petrillo
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1989-03-15
Citations: 18 Conn. App. 801
Docket Number: 6542
Parties: William R. Petrillo v. Janice A. Petrillo
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Appellate Reports
Volume: 18
Pages: 801–801

Head Matter:
William R. Petrillo v. Janice A. Petrillo
(6542)
Dupont, C. J., Stoughton and Norcott, Js.
Argued March 7
decision released March 15, 1989
Robert S. Kolesnik, with whom, on the brief, was Maureen E. Norris, for the appellant (defendant).
William R. Petrillo, pro se, the appellee (plaintiff).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We have scrutinized the record and briefs submitted with this appeal. After affording the defendant's claims of error the appropriate scope of review, we find them to be without merit.
There is no error.