Case Name: Kathleen Breslin WALKER and James Walker, Petitioners, v. Albert ROSE, D.P.M. and Curt D. Miller, M.D., Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1996-07-30
Citations: 545 Pa. 65
Docket Number: 
Parties: Kathleen Breslin WALKER and James Walker, Petitioners, v. Albert ROSE, D.P.M. and Curt D. Miller, M.D., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 545
Pages: 65–66

Head Matter:
679 A.2d 1264
Kathleen Breslin WALKER and James Walker, Petitioners, v. Albert ROSE, D.P.M. and Curt D. Miller, M.D., Respondent.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
July 30, 1996.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
AND NOW, this 30th day of July, 1996, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, but LIMITED to the following issue:
Whether the doctrine of informed consent is applicable to the intravenous administration of a drug when the claim is that the harm in question was caused by the method and location of the injection?
It is further Ordered that Petitioners' Petition for Leave to File Supplement to their Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.