Case Name: Cecelia SIDNEY, Allan H. Sidney, Jr., and Mary I. Sidney, Appellants, v. James DUTCHER and Lloyd Dutcher as Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Elaine Sullivan, Deceased, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1988-02-26
Citations: 520 So. 2d 319
Docket Number: No. 87-1389
Parties: Cecelia SIDNEY, Allan H. Sidney, Jr., and Mary I. Sidney, Appellants, v. James DUTCHER and Lloyd Dutcher as Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Elaine Sullivan, Deceased, Appellees.
Judges: RYDER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and ■ FRANK, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 520
Pages: 319–320

Head Matter:
Cecelia SIDNEY, Allan H. Sidney, Jr., and Mary I. Sidney, Appellants, v. James DUTCHER and Lloyd Dutcher as Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Elaine Sullivan, Deceased, Appellees.
No. 87-1389.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Feb. 26, 1988.
James W. O’Neill, Gulfport, for appellants.
Geneva Forrester and Mark P. Bryan of Geneva Forrester, P.A., St. Petersburg, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the final judgment with one exception. The trial court erred in calculat ing prejudgment interest at the rate of twelve percent per annum from April 19, 1982. That rate became effective July 1, 1982. See Trend Coin Co. v. Honeywell, Inc., 487 So.2d 1029, 1030 (Fla.1986). Upon remand the prejudgment interest should be recalculated to eliminate that error.
Affirmed and remanded for correction of the final judgment in the foregoing respect.
RYDER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and FRANK, JJ., concur.