Case Name: Craig BROOKS, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Board of Review of the Industrial Commission of Utah, Defendants
Court: Utah Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Utah
Decision Date: 1987-04-24
Citations: 736 P.2d 241
Docket Number: No. 860284-CA
Parties: Craig BROOKS, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Board of Review of the Industrial Commission of Utah, Defendants.
Judges: Before BENCH, BILLINGS and DAVIDSON, JJ.
Reporter: Pacific Reporter 2d
Volume: 736
Pages: 241–241

Head Matter:
Craig BROOKS, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Board of Review of the Industrial Commission of Utah, Defendants.
No. 860284-CA.
Court of Appeals of Utah.
April 24, 1987.
LaMar Duncan, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff. ' '
Linda Wheat Field, Attorney, Dept, of Employment Sec., Salt Lake City, for defendants.
Before BENCH, BILLINGS and DAVIDSON, JJ.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
PER CURIAM:
In the above case, plaintiffs counsel filed with this Court a "docketing statement" that does not comply with Rule 9 of the Rules of the Utah Court of Appeals. The statement filed fails to set forth any statutory authority or rule which properly confers jurisdiction upon this Court., Other information required by Rule 9 is also lacking and necessary documents are not attached. R. Utah Ct.App. 9(d).
Docketing statements must fully comply with Rule 9. Failure to comply will result in dismissal of the appeal, particularly when counsel ignores our request that the statement be properly amended. Gregory v. Fourthwest Investments Ltd., 785 P.2d 33 (Utah 1987); R. Utah Ct.App. 9(e).
The appeal is dismissed.