Case Name: HAINES et al v. HENRY et al
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1958-03-19
Citations: 213 Or. 131
Docket Number: 
Parties: HAINES et al v. HENRY et al
Judges: Before Perry, Chief Justice, and Bossman, Brand and McAllister, Justices.
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 213
Pages: 131–132

Head Matter:
Argued January 16,
affirmed March 19, 1958
HAINES et al v. HENRY et al
322 P. 2d 920
D. B. Dimick, Eoseburg, argued the cause for appellants. On the brief were Dimick & Eoll and Daniel P. Koehane, Eoseburg.
Paul E. Geddes, Eoseburg, argued the cause for respondents. On the brief were Geddes, Felker, Walton & Eichmond, Eoseburg.
Before Perry, Chief Justice, and Bossman, Brand and McAllister, Justices.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is a suit brought by sisters, Hazel V. Haines and Frankie Moore, and their husbands against their brothers, W. D. Henry, David D. Henry, James M. Henry, and Calvin S. Henry, and their respective spouses, and W. D. Henry as administrator of the estate of C. S. Henry, deceased, to set aside deeds mutually executed between the parties to effect a friendly partition of the estate lands of their father C. S. Henry, deceased.
The basis of the suit is misrepresentation and fraud practiced by the brothers upon the sisters. The issues presented are those solely of fact, and a review of the facts will add nothing to the case law of the state.
We have carefully examined the record in this case and we are of the opinion the trial court reached a proper decision in dismissing the plaintiffs' suit as set out in his opinion on file in the circuit court.
The decree of the trial court is affirmed. Neither party is to recover costs.