Case Name: Sandra DANIELS; Timothy Marsolf, Lead Relator and on behalf of all relators; Gary Haugen; George C. Stone; Terry L. Perkins; William W. McCoy, Jr.; John T. Davis; Tod J. Callahan; Shawn M. Newcomb; William J. Adams; David R. Taylor; David L. Robins; Teddy G. Dummire; David E. Hart; Clayton L. Howard; David W. Tribett, Plaintiffs, and Keith Christenson; Robert W. Johnston; Neil D. Pake; Scott R. Smith; David R. Durham; Robert A. Collins; Mark S. Huesser; Richard Grooms; Terry J. Staley, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Bill COGSWELL; Ira Blalock; Elizabeth Browne; Chalmers Jones; Elizabeth L. Taylor, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-02-23
Citations: 4 F. App'x 524
Docket Number: No. 00-35299; D.C. No. CV-79-0651-HA
Parties: Sandra DANIELS; Timothy Marsolf, Lead Relator and on behalf of all relators; Gary Haugen; George C. Stone; Terry L. Perkins; William W. McCoy, Jr.; John T. Davis; Tod J. Callahan; Shawn M. Newcomb; William J. Adams; David R. Taylor; David L. Robins; Teddy G. Dummire; David E. Hart; Clayton L. Howard; David W. Tribett, Plaintiffs, and Keith Christenson; Robert W. Johnston; Neil D. Pake; Scott R. Smith; David R. Durham; Robert A. Collins; Mark S. Huesser; Richard Grooms; Terry J. Staley, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Bill COGSWELL; Ira Blalock; Elizabeth Browne; Chalmers Jones; Elizabeth L. Taylor, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before LEAVY, THOMAS, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 4
Pages: 524–525

Head Matter:
Sandra DANIELS; Timothy Marsolf, Lead Relator and on behalf of all relators; Gary Haugen; George C. Stone; Terry L. Perkins; William W. McCoy, Jr.; John T. Davis; Tod J. Callahan; Shawn M. Newcomb; William J. Adams; David R. Taylor; David L. Robins; Teddy G. Dummire; David E. Hart; Clayton L. Howard; David W. Tribett, Plaintiffs, and Keith Christenson; Robert W. Johnston; Neil D. Pake; Scott R. Smith; David R. Durham; Robert A. Collins; Mark S. Huesser; Richard Grooms; Terry J. Staley, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Bill COGSWELL; Ira Blalock; Elizabeth Browne; Chalmers Jones; Elizabeth L. Taylor, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 00-35299.
D.C. No. CV-79-0651-HA.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 12, 2001.
Decided Feb. 23, 2001.
Before LEAVY, THOMAS, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument and denies appellants’ request for oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Nine Oregon state prisoners appeal pro se the district court's order denying their various post-judgment motions, including motions to reactivate a 1979 judgment to bring in new claims.
We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's order filed on February 17, 2000.
AFFIRMED.
. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.