Case Name: CLEVELAND, Appellant, v. CROMWELL, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1910-11-23
Citations: 126 N.Y.S. 1125
Docket Number: 
Parties: CLEVELAND, Appellant, v. CROMWELL, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 126
Pages: 1125–1125

Head Matter:
CLEVELAND, Appellant, v. CROMWELL, Respondent.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Divi- ) sion, Second Department.
November 23, 1910.)
Action by Wilson A. Cleveland against George i 'Cromwell.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We are of opinion that the I evidence of employment by the plaintiff of the 1 defendant as an attorney to represent him in the criminal proceedings is such that the case ' must be submitted to a jury. For that reai son, and on the authority of Cleveland v. Cromwell, 110 App. Div. 82, 96 N. Y. Supp. 475, and Cleveland v. Cromwell, 128 App. Div. 237, 112 N. Y. Supp. 643, the judgment is reversed on reargument, and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. See, also, supra.