Case Name: McCoy v. Randolph, Warden; Epps v. New York; Arbuckle v. Illinois; Williamson et al. v. Gilmer et al.; Scott v. Anderson, Jail Superintendent; Hlozansky v. Cox, Penitentiary Superintendent; Farrell v. Burke, Warden; Hickock v. Crouse, Warden; Smith v. Crouse, Warden; Gratter v. Nash, Warden; Leeper v. Anderson, Jail Superintendent; Hymes v. Dunbar, Corrections Director, et al.
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1965-03-01
Citations: 380 U.S. 928
Docket Number: No. 537; No. 541; No. 546; No. 598; No. 599; No. 601; No. 609; No. 610; No. 614; No. 625; No. 626; No. 693
Parties: McCoy v. Randolph, Warden, Epps v. New York, Arbuckle v. Illinois, Williamson et al. v. Gilmer et al., Scott v. Anderson, Jail Superintendent, Hlozansky v. Cox, Penitentiary Superintendent, Farrell v. Burke, Warden, Hickock v. Crouse, Warden, Smith v. Crouse, Warden, Gratter v. Nash, Warden, Leeper v. Anderson, Jail Superintendent, Hymes v. Dunbar, Corrections Director, et al.,
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 380
Pages: 928–928

Head Matter:
No. 537,
Misc.
No. 541,
Misc.
No. 546,
Misc.
No. 598,
Misc.
No. 599,
Misc.
No. 601,
Misc.
No. 609,
Misc.
No. 610,
Misc.
No. 614,
Misc.
No. 625,
Misc.
No. 626,
Misc.
No. 693,
Misc.
McCoy v. Randolph, Warden, Epps v. New York, Arbuckle v. Illinois, Williamson et al. v. Gilmer et al., Scott v. Anderson, Jail Superintendent, Hlozansky v. Cox, Penitentiary Superintendent, Farrell v. Burke, Warden, Hickock v. Crouse, Warden, Smith v. Crouse, Warden, Gratter v. Nash, Warden, Leeper v. Anderson, Jail Superintendent, Hymes v. Dunbar, Corrections Director, et al.,

Opinion:
379 U. S. 996;
379 U. S. 940;
379 U. S. 978;
379 U. S. 955;
379 U. S. 955;
379 U. S. 981;
379 U. S. 981;
379 U. S. 982;
379 U. S. 982;
379 U. S. 954;
379 U. S. 955; and
379 U. S. 954.
Petitions for rehearing denied.