Case Name: Rhinelander, Hartshorne and others against Peleg P. Sanford and others
Court: United States Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1808-09
Citations: 3 Day 279
Docket Number: 
Parties: Rhinelander, Hartshorne and others against Peleg P. Sanford and others.
Judges: 
Reporter: Day's Reports
Volume: 3
Pages: 279–279

Head Matter:
Rhinelander, Hartshorne and others against Peleg P. Sanford and others.
September, 1808.
A motion for mtá guardian to an mtant party, must be in wnlmS> an(l must state the name of the person proposed, and his be
BRISTOL moved ore tenus for the appointment of a guardian to Peleg P. Sanford, one of the defendants, who was a minor.

Opinion:
Livingston, J.
This motion is too loose. Whenever there is an application for the appointment of a ,. , , . , , . guardian, even pro hac vice, it must be by a petition m writing, therein naming the person proposed, and stating his consent to be appointed.
Motion denied.