Case Name: MAURICE B. GLUCK, APPELLANT, v. SERGIO RUIZ-URRUTIA ET AL., PARTNERS, DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE FIRM NAME OF RUIZ-URRUTIA COMPANY, BUILDERS; RYNDA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY. A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, AND AMELIA R. GLUCK, OWNER, RESPONDENTS
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1925-05-18
Citations: 101 N.J.L. 558
Docket Number: 
Parties: MAURICE B. GLUCK, APPELLANT, v. SERGIO RUIZ-URRUTIA ET AL., PARTNERS, DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE FIRM NAME OF RUIZ-URRUTIA COMPANY, BUILDERS; RYNDA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY. A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, AND AMELIA R. GLUCK, OWNER, RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 101
Pages: 558–560

Head Matter:
MAURICE B. GLUCK, APPELLANT, v. SERGIO RUIZ-URRUTIA ET AL., PARTNERS, DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE FIRM NAME OF RUIZ-URRUTIA COMPANY, BUILDERS; RYNDA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY. A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, AND AMELIA R. GLUCK, OWNER, RESPONDENTS.
Submitted March 25, 1925
Decided May 18, 1925.
Eor the appellant, Maurice B. Gluck, pro se.
Eor the respondent Rynda Development Company, Jacob Hauptman.

Opinion:
Pee Cueiaii. '
The order under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed by Judge Dungan in the Circuit Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbaoh, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 16.
For reversal — None.