Case Name: HULME v. DUNLAVEY et al.
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1915-07-27
Citations: 50 Okla. 317
Docket Number: No. 4845
Parties: HULME v. DUNLAVEY et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 50
Pages: 317–318

Head Matter:
HULME v. DUNLAVEY et al.
No. 4845.
Opinion Filed July 27, 1915.
(150 Pac. 1054.)
APPEAL AND ERROR — Briefs—Necessity. Wliere plaintiff in error-lias failed to file brief as required by rule 7 of tbis court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix), and offered no excuse for such failure, tbe cause-will be dismissed.
(■Syllabus by McKeown, O.)
Error from Superior Court, Custer County; J. W. Lawter, Judge.
Action by W. W. Dunlavey against Elcie Maud: Moore, George ,W. Hulme, and others. Judgment for' plaintiff, and defendant George W. Hulme brings error;.
Dismissed.
Geo. T. Webster, for plaintiff in error.
Swan C. Burnette, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
Opinion by
McKEOWN, C.
The petition in error and"' the transcript of the record in this case was filed in this' court February 27, 1913. Neither party has filed a brief,, nor offered any excuse for their failure to do so. It: is? evident that the appeal has been abandoned, and the motion of defendant in error tp dismiss will be sustained, and cause dismissed, under rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix).
By the Court: It is so ordered.