Case Name: LaPosta v. Himmer et al., Appellants, et al.
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1947-11-24
Citations: 358 Pa. 69
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 177
Parties: LaPosta v. Himmer et al., Appellants, et al.
Judges: Before Maxey, C. J., Drew, Linn, Stern, Patterson, Stearne and Jones, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 358
Pages: 69–78

Head Matter:
LaPosta v. Himmer et al., Appellants, et al.
Argued October 2,1947.
Before Maxey, C. J., Drew, Linn, Stern, Patterson, Stearne and Jones, JJ.
Sanford M. Chile ote, with him Dickie, Robinson & McCamey, for defendant, appellants.
E. V. Buckley, with him Mercer & Buckley, for plaintiff, appellee.
Samuel W. Pringle, with him Dalzell, McFall, Pringle & Bredin, for additional defendant, áppellée.
November 24, 1947:

Opinion:
Pee Curiam,
All of the alleged errors covered by the appellants' assignments on this appeal were painstakingly considered and correctly disposed of by the learned court en banc. As nothing is to be gained by Our reiterating either the facts or the law, the judgment will be affirmed on the opinion of Judge Kennedy for the court below.
Judgment affirmed.