Case Name: David AGUERO DIAZ; Angelica Ramirez Alonso, Petitioners, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-11-15
Citations: 113 F. App'x 811
Docket Number: No. 03-70420
Parties: David AGUERO DIAZ; Angelica Ramirez Alonso, Petitioners, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: GOODWIN, FISHER, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 113
Pages: 811–812

Head Matter:
David AGUERO DIAZ; Angelica Ramirez Alonso, Petitioners, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 03-70420.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Nov. 4, 2004.
Decided Nov. 15, 2004.
Before: GOODWIN, FISHER, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Diaz and Ramirez appeal the Board of Immigration Appeals' decision upholding the immigration judge's denial of their motion to reopen, and claim that the denial of their motion constituted a due process violation resulting in prejudice to the outcome of their case.
While Diaz and Ramirez were afforded ample due process, their petition for review is granted. We remand their case to the Board of Immigration Appeals for consideration of the merits in light of In re Monreal-Aguinaga, 23 I. & N. Dec. 56 (BIA 2001).
The petition for review is GRANTED and the case REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.