Case Name: ROBERT M. YAMADA and EMMA M. YAMADA, Appellants, v. NATURAL DISASTER CLAIMS COMMISSION FOR THE COUNTY OF HAWAII FOR THE VOLCANIC ERUPTION OF 1960 and THE TSUNAMI OF 1960, Appellee
Court: Supreme Court of the State of Hawaii
Jurisdiction: Hawaii
Decision Date: 1973-11-28
Citations: 55 Haw. 126
Docket Number: NO. 5223
Parties: ROBERT M. YAMADA and EMMA M. YAMADA, Appellants, v. NATURAL DISASTER CLAIMS COMMISSION FOR THE COUNTY OF HAWAII FOR THE VOLCANIC ERUPTION OF 1960 and THE TSUNAMI OF 1960, Appellee.
Judges: RICHARDSON, C.J., MARUMOTO and LEVINSON, JJ., CIRCUIT JUDGE VITOUSEK in place of ABE, J„ disqualified, and CIRCUIT JUDGE KAWAKAMI in place of KOBAYASHI, J., disqualified
Reporter: Hawaii Reports
Volume: 55
Pages: 126–126

Head Matter:
ROBERT M. YAMADA and EMMA M. YAMADA, Appellants, v. NATURAL DISASTER CLAIMS COMMISSION FOR THE COUNTY OF HAWAII FOR THE VOLCANIC ERUPTION OF 1960 and THE TSUNAMI OF 1960, Appellee.
NO. 5223
NOVEMBER 28, 1973
RICHARDSON, C.J., MARUMOTO and LEVINSON, JJ., CIRCUIT JUDGE VITOUSEK in place of ABE, J„ disqualified, and CIRCUIT JUDGE KAWAKAMI in place of KOBAYASHI, J., disqualified
T. Bruce Honda, Deputy Attorney General (George Pai, Attorney General, of counsel) for the petition.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The petition for rehearing is denied without argument. The opinion of the court filed herein is limited to this case and the facts presented therein. The opinion does not govern other natural disaster claim cases involving facts different from those presented in this case.
We reaffirm the reversal of the judgment appealed from on the principal ground stated in the opinion, and not on the alternative ground relating to equitable estoppel. There may be situations in which the government may be equitably estopped, but, upon further consideration, we do not think that this case presents such a situation.
Chief Justice Richardson, who dissented from the majority and Judge Kawakami, who now joins the Chief Justice in his dissent, do not concur.