Case Name: THOMAS TONKS AND HARRY TONKS, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR, v. WILLIAM F. MULLIN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1908-03-02
Citations: 75 N.J.L. 942
Docket Number: 
Parties: THOMAS TONKS AND HARRY TONKS, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR, v. WILLIAM F. MULLIN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 75
Pages: 942–943

Head Matter:
THOMAS TONKS AND HARRY TONKS, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR, v. WILLIAM F. MULLIN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Argued November 29, 1907 —
Decided March 2, 1908.
On error to the Supreme Court.
For the plaintiff in error, Biker •& Biker.
For the defendants in error, Pitney, Hardin & Skinner.

Opinion:
Pee Curiam.
An examination of the record discloses no error prejudicial to the plaintiff in error. The judgment under review should be affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Eeed, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Bogert, Yroom, Green, Gray, Dill, J.J. 12.
For reversal — None.