Case Name: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Osberto Dejesus VARGAS, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2006-08-31
Citations: 937 So. 2d 663
Docket Number: No. SC05-1125
Parties: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Osberto Dejesus VARGAS, Respondent.
Judges: LEWIS, C.J., and WELLS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 937
Pages: 663–664

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Osberto Dejesus VARGAS, Respondent.
No. SC05-1125.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Aug. 31, 2006.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, FL, and Angel L. Fleming, Assistant Attorney General, Miami, FL, for Petitioner.
Bennett J. Brummer, Public Defender, and Robert Kalter, Assistant Public Defender, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami, FL, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have for review Vargas v. State, 902 So.2d 166 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004), disapproved by, Jones v. State, 923 So.2d 486 (Fla.2006), in which the Third District Court of Appeal certified conflict with the decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal in Jones v. State, 870 So.2d 904 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004), approved, 923 So.2d 486 (Fla.2006). At the time the Third District issued its decision in Vargas, Jones was pending review in this Court. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.
The petition for review is granted. On the authority of our decision in Jones v. State, 923 So.2d 486 (Fla.2006), the decision under review is quashed, and this matter is remanded to the Third District Court of Appeal for reconsideration upon application of this Court's decision in Jones.
It is so ordered.
LEWIS, C.J., and WELLS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.
PARIENTE, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with an opinion, in which ANSTEAD, J., concurs.