Case Name: Daniel Moreno PALACIOS, also known as Javier Hernandez Dela Cruz, Petitioner v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, U. S. Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-01-04
Citations: 707 F. App'x 833
Docket Number: No. 16-60697 Summary Calendar
Parties: Daniel Moreno PALACIOS, also known as Javier Hernandez Dela Cruz, Petitioner v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, U. S. Attorney General, Respondent
Judges: Before REAVLEY, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 707
Pages: 833–833

Head Matter:
Daniel Moreno PALACIOS, also known as Javier Hernandez Dela Cruz, Petitioner v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, U. S. Attorney General, Respondent
No. 16-60697 Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed January 4, 2018
Francisco Alvillar, Alvillar Law, P.C., San Antonio, TX, for Petitioner
Claire L. Workman, Senior. Litigation Counsel, Maarja Tiganik Luhtaru, Trial Attorney, David Michael McConnell, Office of Immigration Litigation, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Sandra M. Heathman, U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services, Houston, TX, for Respondent
Before REAVLEY, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Daniel Moreno Palacios, a native and citizen of Mexico, challenges the validity of a 2013 removal order in this petition for review. Palacios failed to contest the 2013 order earlier in the proceedings. He did not respond to the Notice of Intent to Issue a Final Administrative Removal Order or otherwise attempt to rebut the charge that he was removable based on his prior conviction for an aggravated felony, nor did he challenge the 2013 order by filing a petition for review. See 8 C.F.R, § 238.1(c), 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(5). He also reentered the United States illegally in violation of his deportation order.
This court lacks jurisdiction to consider the constitutional challenge to the underlying removal order. See Martinez v. Johnson, 740 F.3d 1040, 1042-43 (5th Cir. 2014). Palacios's petition for review is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.