Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. TIMOTHY RAY VANCE, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1992-11-12
Citations: 116 Or. App. 386
Docket Number: 91C-20291; CA A70751
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. TIMOTHY RAY VANCE, Appellant.
Judges: Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Rossman and De Muniz, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 116
Pages: 386–386

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted July 10,
convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing November 12, 1992,
reconsideration denied February 10,
petition for review denied March 23, 1993 (315 Or 644)
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. TIMOTHY RAY VANCE, Appellant.
(91C-20291; CA A70751)
842 P2d 418
Gary D. Babcock, Salem, filed the brief for appellant.
Ann F. Kelley, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Charles S. Crook-ham, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Katherine H. Waldo, Assistant Attorney General, Salem.
Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Rossman and De Muniz, Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing. State v. Haydon, 113 Or App 205, 832 P2d 457, on recon 116 Or App 347, 842 P2d 410 (1992).