Case Name: Uni-Serv Corp., Appellant, v. Albert W. Frede, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1967-03-16
Citations: 53 Misc. 2d 644
Docket Number: 
Parties: Uni-Serv Corp., Appellant, v. Albert W. Frede, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 53
Pages: 644–644

Head Matter:
Uni-Serv Corp., Appellant, v. Albert W. Frede, Respondent.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
March 16, 1967.
Royall, Koegel & Rogers (William J. Ryan and Joseph H. Spam of counsel), for appellant. Van B. Kruchten for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We affirm on the ground that plaintiff has failed to establish the existence of the contract on which it sued. We reach no other issue.
The judgment should be affirmed, with $25 costs.
Concur — Hecht, Jr., J. P., Gold and Hopstadter, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, etc.