Case Name: Marie I. ANDERSON and Ernest Anderson, Appellants, v. Willie REDDEN, Jr., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1987-04-07
Citations: 505 So. 2d 22
Docket Number: No. 86-1686
Parties: Marie I. ANDERSON and Ernest Anderson, Appellants, v. Willie REDDEN, Jr., Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HENDRY and FERGUSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 505
Pages: 22–22

Head Matter:
Marie I. ANDERSON and Ernest Anderson, Appellants, v. Willie REDDEN, Jr., Appellee.
No. 86-1686.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 7, 1987.
Patton & Kanner and Cromwell A. Anderson, Miami, for appellants.
Terrence E. Rosenberg, Miami Beach, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HENDRY and FERGUSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The summary judgment below is reversed because the plaintiff-movant did not conclusively obviate the affirmative defense of fraud. See Nagelbush v. United Postal Savings Ass'n, 504 So.2d 782 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Holly Hill Acres, Ltd. v. Charter Bank, 314 So.2d 209 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975); see also Aroll v. ITT Commercial Finance Corp., 496 So.2d 1011 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); O'Neal v. Brady, 476 So.2d 294 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Proprietors Ins. v. Siegel, 410 So.2d 993 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).