Case Name: D. Richard SENA, Appellant, v. Harold J. WHITE, doing business as Ace Sandblasting and Paint Company, Appellee
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1955-01-25
Citations: 77 So. 2d 786
Docket Number: 
Parties: D. Richard SENA, Appellant, v. Harold J. WHITE, doing business as Ace Sandblasting and Paint Company, Appellee.
Judges: MATHEWS, C. J., and TERRELL, SEBRING and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 77
Pages: 786–786

Head Matter:
D. Richard SENA, Appellant, v. Harold J. WHITE, doing business as Ace Sandblasting and Paint Company, Appellee.
Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.
Jan. 25, 1955.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 22, 1955.
Thomas A. Horkan, Jr., Miami, for appellant.
Jonathan E. Ammerman, Miami, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The record and the briefs in this cause have been examined. The facts distinguish the case from Muller v. Maxcy, Fla., 74 So.2d 879. Appellant not having made error clearly appear, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
Affirmed.
MATHEWS, C. J., and TERRELL, SEBRING and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.