Case Name: ROOSEVELT BANK, Respondent, v. Larry D. LUMLEY and Karen A. Lumley, Appellants
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1996-08-20
Citations: 926 S.W.2d 948
Docket Number: No. 69332
Parties: ROOSEVELT BANK, Respondent, v. Larry D. LUMLEY and Karen A. Lumley, Appellants.
Judges: Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 926
Pages: 948–949

Head Matter:
ROOSEVELT BANK, Respondent, v. Larry D. LUMLEY and Karen A. Lumley, Appellants.
No. 69332.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Aug. 20, 1996.
Appellants pro se.
Gregory F. Hoffmann, Millar, Schaefer, Hoffmann & Robertson, St. Louis, for respondent. .
Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellants, Larry D. Lumley and Karen A. Lumley, appeal the judgment sustaining respondent's, Roosevelt Bank's, motion for summary judgment on its action to recover the balance due on two promissory notes. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find no error. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.1603).