Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos Horacio ZAMORA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-04-16
Citations: 95 F. App'x 246
Docket Number: No. 03-50168
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Carlos Horacio ZAMORA, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 95
Pages: 246–246

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Carlos Horacio ZAMORA, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 03-50168.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 12, 2004.
Decided April 16, 2004.
Mark Krause, Esq., USLA, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Gerald C. Salseda, DFPD, Elizabeth A. Newman, Esq., FPDCA, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, RYMER and BEA, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Carlos Horacio Zamora appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 97-month sentence for conspiracy to possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, 841(a)(1).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Zamora has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Zamora has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.