Case Name: Rayvern Earl GREEN, formerly inmate 340900, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Warden M. McCALL, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-07-30
Citations: 536 F. App'x 331
Docket Number: No. 13-6918
Parties: Rayvern Earl GREEN, formerly inmate 340900, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Warden M. McCALL, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before GREGORY, DAVIS, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 536
Pages: 331–331

Head Matter:
Rayvern Earl GREEN, formerly inmate 340900, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Warden M. McCALL, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 13-6918.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 25, 2013.
Decided: July 30, 2013.
Rayvern Earl Green, Appellant Pro Se.
Before GREGORY, DAVIS, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER . CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Rayvern Earl Green seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing his complaint without prejudice for failing to comply with orders of the court and failing to prosecute. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Green seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Green may be able to reopen his case by filing a motion in the district court and complying with the court's order. Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir.1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.