Case Name: BLACKSTOCK v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1930-04-23
Citations: 29 S.W.2d 365
Docket Number: No. 13267
Parties: BLACKSTOCK v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 29
Pages: 365–367

Head Matter:
BLACKSTOCK v. STATE.
No. 13267.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
April 23, 1930.
Appeal Reinstated May 14, 1930.
State’s Rehearing Denied June 18, 1930.
C. D. Spann, of Meridian, J. L. Bird, of Walnut Springs, and My res & Pressly, of Fort Worth, for appellant.
J. P. Word, Co. Atty., of Meridian, and A. A. Dawson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
CHRISTIAN, J.
The offense is possessing a still, mash, and equipment for the purpose of manufacturing intoxicating liquor; the punishment confinement in the penitentiary for one year.
The caption fails to show the date of the adjournment of the trial court. Under the decisions of this court, the appeal must be dismissed. Yarborough v. State, 100 Tex. Cr. R. 480, 273 S. W. 842; Lowery v. State, 92 Tex. Cr. R. 311, 244 S. W. 147; Cousineau v. State, 110 Tex. Cr. R. 445, 10 S.W.(2d) 98.
The appeal is dismissed.
PER CURIAM.
The foregoing .opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.