Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ramiro Tony FLORES, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-09-03
Citations: 394 F. App'x 435
Docket Number: No. 09-30274
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ramiro Tony FLORES, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 394
Pages: 435–436

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ramiro Tony FLORES, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-30274.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 23, 2010.
Filed Sept. 3, 2010.
Anthony G. Hall, Esquire, Monte J. Stiles, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Boise, ID, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Ramiro Tony Flores appeals from the 150-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine and conspiracy to launder money, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 846, and 18 U.S.C. § 1956, 1956(h), and 1957. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Flores contends that the district court violated Federal Rule of Criminal Proce dure 32(i)(3)(B) by applying a four-level leadership role enhancement, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3Bl.l(a), without resolving disputed portions of the presentence investigation report. The district court properly overruled Flores' objection to the leadership role enhancement as he did not raise any specific factual disputes that required resolution by the district court. See United States v. Stoterau, 524 F.3d 988, 1011-12 (9th Cir.2008); cf. United States v. Carter, 219 F.3d 863, 867-68 (9th Cir.2000).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.