Case Name: Fred Lewis WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. A. COLEMAN, D.A.; C/O Tulip; C/O Triplett; LT. D. Fleming, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-09-13
Citations: 395 F. App'x 41
Docket Number: No. 09-7896
Parties: Fred Lewis WILSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. A. COLEMAN, D.A.; C/O Tulip; C/O Triplett; LT. D. Fleming, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 395
Pages: 41–42

Head Matter:
Fred Lewis WILSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. A. COLEMAN, D.A.; C/O Tulip; C/O Triplett; LT. D. Fleming, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 09-7896.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 18, 2010.
Decided: Sept. 13, 2010.
Fred Lewis Wilson, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Fred Lewis Wilson appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint for failure to state a claim, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wilson v. Coleman, No. 7:09-cv-00325-gec-mfu, 2009 WL 3055268 (W.D.Va. Sept. 24, 2009). Wilson's motion for transfer pending appeal is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal con tentions ai'e adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.