Case Name: Robert McVEIGH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-07-27
Citations: 139 S.W.3d 238
Docket Number: No. WD 62518
Parties: Robert McVEIGH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before: HARDWICK, P.J., SPINDEN and NEWTON, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 139
Pages: 238–239

Head Matter:
Robert McVEIGH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 62518.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
July 27, 2004.
Deborah Daniels, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Ruth Sanders, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
Before: HARDWICK, P.J., SPINDEN and NEWTON, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Robert McVeigh appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. McVeigh alleges his trial counsel was ineffective in failing to object to a redirect examination that went beyond the scope of cross-examination. Upon review of the record, we affirm the denial of post-conviction relief because McVeigh was not prejudiced by his counsel's conduct. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our de- cisión because a published opinion would have no jurisprudential value.
Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).