Case Name: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner v. Samuel CHERICO, Joseph Cherico, and Anthony Cherico, doing business as Clarion Fruit Company, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1963-02-27
Citations: 313 F.2d 633
Docket Number: No. 14064
Parties: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner v. Samuel CHERICO, Joseph Cherico, and Anthony Cherico, doing business as Clarion Fruit Company, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 313
Pages: 633–633

Head Matter:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner v. Samuel CHERICO, Joseph Cherico, and Anthony Cherico, doing business as Clarion Fruit Company, Respondent.
No. 14064.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued Feb. 4, 1963.
Decided Feb. 27, 1963.
James Harkless, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. General Counsel, Marcel, Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison, Atty., National Labor Relations Bd., on the brief), for petitioner.
Before KALODNER, STALEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
On review of the record we are of the opinion that the National Labor Relations Board has jurisdiction; that substantial evidence supports its findings that the respondents violated Section 8 (a) (1) and Section 8(a) (3) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act, and that the Board's Order is valid and proper.
For the reasons stated the Board's petition for enforcement will be granted.