Case Name: Russell G. TURNER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Craig APKER, Respondent-Appellee, and Sara M. Revell, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-06-30
Citations: 692 F. App'x 708
Docket Number: No. 13-7784
Parties: Russell G. TURNER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Craig APKER, Respondent-Appellee, and Sara M. Revell, Respondent.
Judges: Before MOTZ, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 692
Pages: 708–709

Head Matter:
Russell G. TURNER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Craig APKER, Respondent-Appellee, and Sara M. Revell, Respondent.
No. 13-7784
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 12, 2017
Decided: June 30, 2017
Russell G. Turner, Appellant Pro Se. Edward D. Gray, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Ap-pellee.
Before MOTZ, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Russell Garnet Turner, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in for-ma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Turner v. Apker, No. 5:12-hc-02122-BO (E.D.N.C. July 30 & Oct. 22, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED