Case Name: In the Matter of General Railway Signal Company, Appellant, v. New York State Division of Human Rights et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1980-09-11
Citations: 51 N.Y.2d 763
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of General Railway Signal Company, Appellant, v New York State Division of Human Rights et al., Respondents.
Judges: Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 51
Pages: 763–764

Head Matter:
In the Matter of General Railway Signal Company, Appellant, v New York State Division of Human Rights et al., Respondents.
Argued September 5, 1980;
decided September 11, 1980
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
William E. McKnight and Robb M. Jones for appellant.
Robert D. Goodstein and Ann Thacher Anderson for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs. Prohibition does not lie (Matter of Tessy Plastics Corp. v State Div. of Human Rights, 47 NY2d 789, 791; see Matter of Sarkisian Bros. v State Div. of Human Rights, 48 NY2d 816, 818).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.