Case Name: CONNETICUT FIRE INS. CO. v. HIRST
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1927-06-27
Citations: 6 Ohio Law Abs. 8
Docket Number: No. 3058
Parties: CONNETICUT FIRE INS. CO. v. HIRST.
Judges: (Cushing, J., concurs. Buchwalter, J., not participating.)
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 6
Pages: 8–9

Head Matter:
CONNETICUT FIRE INS. CO. v. HIRST.
Ohio Appeals, 1st Dist., Hamilton Co.
No. 3058.
Decided June 27, 1927.
Harmon, Colston, Goldsmith & Hoadly, Cincinnati, for Fire Ins. Co.
Simon L. Leis, Cincinnati, for Hirst. . •

Opinion:
OPINION OF COURT.
The following is taken, verbatim, from the opinion.
HAMILTON, PJ.
We are of the opinion that the evidence that the insulation was burned off or destroyed, that the coils were destroyed, and that there were large volumes of smoke issuing from the car, and that the fire, if such it be, was extinguished by a garage man with a fire extinguisher, is sufficient to warrant the judgment of the trial court, and that judgment is affirmed, as is the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas, affirming the judgment of the Municipal Court.
(Cushing, J., concurs. Buchwalter, J., not participating.)