Case Name: Julaine SOLOMON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION; Pierce County, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-09-21
Citations: 481 F. App'x 342
Docket Number: No. 11-35396
Parties: Julaine SOLOMON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION; Pierce County, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 481
Pages: 342–343

Head Matter:
Julaine SOLOMON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION; Pierce County, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 11-35396.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 10, 2012.
Filed Sept. 21, 2012.
Julaine Solomon, Tacoma, WA, pro se.
Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Julaine Solomon appeals pro se from the district court's order denying her motion to reconsider in her action against the Social Security Administration and Pierce County. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion the district court's order denying a motion to reconsider. Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah Cnty., Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th Cir.1998). We affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Solomon's motion to reconsider because Solomon failed to demonstrate mistake, inadvertence, surprise, excusable neglect, newly discovered evidence, or any other basis for relief from judgment. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b); Sch. Dist. No. 1J, 5 F.3d at 1263.
To the extent that they seek relief, Solomon's pending motions are denied.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.