Case Name: ___CONGER v. CARMICHAEL CONST. CO.___
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1923-05-04
Citations: 1 Ohio Law Abs. 782
Docket Number: No. 607
Parties: ___CONGER v. CARMICHAEL CONST. CO.___
Judges: 
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 1
Pages: 782–782

Head Matter:
No. 804
___CONGER v. CARMICHAEL CONST. CO.___
Ohio Appeals, 9th District, Summit County
No. 607.
Decided May 4, 1923
166. ERROR.
Instant case was not within rule of Simpson v Polski Co., No. 545, and Thomas v. Van Roon et al No. 594.
Attorneys — Burch, Bacon & Denlinger, for Con ger; Commins, Brouse, Englebeck & McDowell, fo Carmichael Construction Company. ÉKM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Epitomized Opinion
In this case the court held:
1. The trial court committed error in directing : verdict for the defendant Company upon the authority of Simpson v. Polski Co., No. 545, and Thomas v. Van Roon et al, No. 594.