Case Name: Henry Rowe v. The State
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1925-11-11
Citations: 102 Tex. Crim. 188
Docket Number: No. 9239
Parties: Henry Rowe v. The State.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Criminal Reports
Volume: 102
Pages: 188–188

Head Matter:
Henry Rowe v. The State.
No. 9239.
Delivered November 11, 1925.
Jerry E. Clarke, for appellant.
Sam D. Stinson, State’s Attorney, and Nat Gentry, Jr., Assistant State’s Attorney, for the State.

Opinion:
BERRY, Judge.
The appellant was convicted in the District Court of Hill County for the oifense of possession of intoxicating liquor and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of one year.
The record is before us without any bills of exceptions. The case has been briefed by counsel for the appellant and complaint is made at the court's charge. There is no fundamental error found in the charge of the court and nothing before this court in the record that can be considered.
A careful examination of the statement <?f facts convinces us that the appellant's guilt is shown beyond controversy if the State's testimony is to be believed. This was a question for the jury to decide, and having decided the issues against the contention of the appellant, we deem it improper to disturb their verdict under the facts of this case.
Finding no error in the record, it is our opinion that the judgment should be in all things affirmed.
Affirmed;
The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.