Case Name: Sheila H. KERSHAW, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF the SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-04-29
Citations: 61 F. App'x 881
Docket Number: No. 02-2101
Parties: Sheila H. KERSHAW, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF the SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 61
Pages: 881–881

Head Matter:
Sheila H. KERSHAW, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF the SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 02-2101.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 24, 2003.
Decided April 29, 2003.
Stephen L. Barden, III, Ball, Barden & Bell, P.A., Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., United States Attorney, Paul B. Taylor, Assistant United States Attorney, Lisa de Soto, General Counsel, Charlotte J. Hardnett, Associate General Counsel, Eileen A. Farmer, Office of the General Counsel, Social Security Administration, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Sheila H. Kershaw appeals the district court's order dismissing her complaint with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) based on the doctrine of res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Kershaw v. Commissioner, No. CA-02-131-1-T (W.D.N.C. Aug. 28, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.