Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Samuel SANCHEZ and Francisco Armendaris, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1983-06-16
Citations: 709 F.2d 1353
Docket Number: No. 82-5302
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Samuel SANCHEZ and Francisco Armendaris, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before FAY and VANCE, Circuit Judges, and ALLGOOD , District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 709
Pages: 1353–1353

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Samuel SANCHEZ and Francisco Armendaris, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 82-5302.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
June 16, 1983.
Stanley Marcus, U.S. Atty., Robert A. Rosenberg, Asst. U.S. Atty., Miami, Fla., for plaintiff-appellant.
Frank H. Alvarez, Miami, Fla., for defendants-appellees.
Honorable Clarence W. Allgood, U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Alabama, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
Before FAY and VANCE, Circuit Judges, and ALLGOOD , District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
The Petition for Rehearing, insofar as the same is addressed to the panel, is DENIED. A review of the record and the briefs, along with statements made by counsel during oral argument, convinces us that it would have been absolutely futile for the appellees to have raised a elaim of duress or coercion in the administrative proceedings.
. Rule 26(F) of our Local Rules provides that, "A suggestion for rehearing en banc will also be treated as a petition for rehearing before the original panel."