Case Name: Michael P. NASIATKA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gordon R. ENGLAND, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Defendant-Appellee, and Hansford T. Johnson, Acting Secretary of the Navy; Richard J. Naughton, Vice Admiral, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-04-10
Citations: 174 F. App'x 797
Docket Number: No. 05-1444
Parties: Michael P. NASIATKA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gordon R. ENGLAND, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Defendant—Appellee, and Hansford T. Johnson, Acting Secretary of the Navy; Richard J. Naughton, Vice Admiral, Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 174
Pages: 797–797

Head Matter:
Michael P. NASIATKA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gordon R. ENGLAND, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Defendant—Appellee, and Hansford T. Johnson, Acting Secretary of the Navy; Richard J. Naughton, Vice Admiral, Defendants.
No. 05-1444.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 29, 2006.
Decided: April 10, 2006.
Michael P. Nasiatka, Appellant Pro Se. Tarra Deshields Minnis, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Michael P. Nasiatka appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of his employer in this employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Na-siatka v. England, No. CA-03-900-RDB (D. Md. Oct. 9, 2003; Mar. 10, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED