Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Evaristo Rodriguez, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2010-05-11
Citations: 73 A.D.3d 953
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Evaristo Rodriguez, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 73
Pages: 953–953

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Evaristo Rodriguez, Appellant.
[899 NYS2d 874]

Opinion:
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Murphy, J.), rendered July 3, 2008, convicting him of attempted burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant's assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).
The defendant has not, nor could he have, raised any nonfrivolous issues in his supplemental pro se brief. Mastro, J.P., Miller, Leventhal and Belen, JJ., concur.