Case Name: Madeline M. LAMBERT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles J. CRIST, Jr., as Attorney General, State of Florida, Rosena Finklea, et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-03-12
Citations: 219 F. App'x 952
Docket Number: No. 06-14926
Parties: Madeline M. LAMBERT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles J. CRIST, Jr., as Attorney General, State of Florida, Rosena Finklea, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 219
Pages: 952–952

Head Matter:
Madeline M. LAMBERT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles J. CRIST, Jr., as Attorney General, State of Florida, Rosena Finklea, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 06-14926
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
March 12, 2007.
Joseph Stern, Delray Beach, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Thomas M. Gonzalez, Thompson, Size-more & Gonzalez, P.A., Tampa, FL, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before ANDERSON, BLACK and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Madeline Lambert appeals the district court's dismissal of her 28 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Richard Moore, Rosena Finklea, Yvette MacMillan, Robert Dietz, and Charles J. Crist, Jr. The district court concluded Moore and Finklea were entitled to qualified immunity, MacMillan and Dietz were entitled to absolute immunity, and Lambert failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted against Crist for supervisor liability. After a de novo review, we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's well-reasoned order of August 16, 2006.
AFFIRMED.