Case Name: Donald ROBERTS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2009-12-15
Citations: 302 S.W.3d 226
Docket Number: No. ED 92452
Parties: Donald ROBERTS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 302
Pages: 226–227

Head Matter:
Donald ROBERTS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 92452.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Dec. 15, 2009.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 21, 2010.
Application for Transfer Denied March 2, 2010.
Elizabeth Unger Carlyle, Columbus, MS, for appellant.
Jamie Pamela Rasmussen, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Donald Roberts, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits after a hearing his motion to reopen his Rule 29.15 post-conviction proceeding. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).