Case Name: Elizabeth E. PFEIFFER, Appellant/Cross Appellee, v. Arthur W. PFEIFFER, Appellee/Cross Appellant
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-12-06
Citations: 553 So. 2d 339
Docket Number: No. 89-0189
Parties: Elizabeth E. PFEIFFER, Appellant/Cross Appellee, v. Arthur W. PFEIFFER, Appellee/Cross Appellant.
Judges: ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and GARRETT, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 553
Pages: 339–340

Head Matter:
Elizabeth E. PFEIFFER, Appellant/Cross Appellee, v. Arthur W. PFEIFFER, Appellee/Cross Appellant.
No. 89-0189.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Dec. 6, 1989.
Joan B. Tucker of Brackett, Cook, Sned, Welch, D’Angio & Tucker, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant/cross appellee.
Timothy W. Gaskill of DeSantis, Cook, Kauffman, Gaskill, McCarthy, Schwartz & Hunston, P.A., North Palm Beach, for ap-pellee/cross appellant.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the appeal and cross appeal except for the equitable distribution. Because of a mathematical error in the present day valuation of the insurance agency, a marital asset, we remand for the trial court — at the individual expense of the respective parties — to correct same and to effect such equitable distribution as the trial court may determine based on a correct valuation figure.
ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and GARRETT, JJ., concur.