Case Name: RICHARD L. AND JANET MUTCH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF TAXATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1989-02-01
Citations: 11 N.J. Tax 87
Docket Number: 
Parties: RICHARD L. AND JANET MUTCH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF TAXATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Tax Court Reports
Volume: 11
Pages: 87–88

Head Matter:
RICHARD L. AND JANET MUTCH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF TAXATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued January 19, 1989
Decided February 1, 1989.
Before Judges GAULKIN and BILDER.
Richard S. Hyland argued the cause for appellants (Myers, Matteo, Rabil, Norcross & Landgraf, attorneys; Mitchell J. Rabil, on the brief).
Jeanne E. Gorrissen, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Cary Edwards, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Benjamin Clarke, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel; Jeanne E. Gorrissen, on the brief).

Opinion:
The opinion of the court was delivered by
BILDER, J.A.D.
The judgment of the Tax Court is affirmed substantially for the reasons given by Judge Lario in his opinion reported at 9 N.J.Tax 612 (1986).