Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Lee STULCE, Jr., Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-02-03
Citations: 959 S.W.2d 148
Docket Number: No. WD 53822
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Lee STULCE, Jr., Appellant.
Judges: Before ULRICH, C.J., and SMART and ELLIS, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 959
Pages: 148–149

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Lee STULCE, Jr., Appellant.
No. WD 53822.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Feb. 3, 1998.
Mark A Richardson, Neff & Richardson, Jefferson City, for appellant.
Anji Gandhi, Asst. Pros. Atty., Cole County, Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before ULRICH, C.J., and SMART and ELLIS, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Lee Stulce, Jr. appeals his convictions following bench trial for resisting arrest, section 575.150, RSMo 1994, and a term of sixty days imprisonment in the county jail, suspended execution, and two years probation. Mr. Stulce raises three points on appeal. He contends the trial court erred in (1) convicting him where the evidence was insufficient to establish he resisted arrest; (2) failing to grant his motion to dismiss because section 575.150 is unconstitutionally vague; and (3) directing the prosecutor to make an opening statement after she had initially declined to do so. The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).