Case Name: Felipe Morales et al., Appellants, v. Helmut Rothke et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1966-12-01
Citations: 18 N.Y.2d 913
Docket Number: 
Parties: Felipe Morales et al., Appellants, v. Helmut Rothke et al., Respondents.
Judges: Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Yak Voorhis and Scileppi. Judges Burke, Bergan and Keating dissent and vote to reverse and to grant a new trial as to plaintiffs, Felipe Morales and Louis M. Morales, on the ground that their contributory negligence was a question of fact for the jury (see Vanyo v. Salisbury, 16 N Y 2d 969).
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 18
Pages: 913–915

Head Matter:
Felipe Morales et al., Appellants, v. Helmut Rothke et al., Respondents.
Argued October 25, 1966;
decided December 1, 1966.
Norman Bard for appellants.
Arthur N. Seiff and William P. Kewnedy for Helmut and Anna Rothke, respondents.
William J. Began for Ralph Saralequi, respondent.

Opinion:
Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Yak Voorhis and Scileppi. Judges Burke, Bergan and Keating dissent and vote to reverse and to grant a new trial as to plaintiffs, Felipe Morales and Louis M. Morales, on the ground that their contributory negligence was a question of fact for the jury (see Vanyo v. Salisbury, 16 N Y 2d 969).