Case Name: Clarence MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RICHMOND NURSING HOME; Boris T. Simmons, Police Officer, 1312-6, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-09-28
Citations: 201 F. App'x 154
Docket Number: No. 06-1759
Parties: Clarence MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RICHMOND NURSING HOME; Boris T. Simmons, Police Officer, 1312-6, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 201
Pages: 154–155

Head Matter:
Clarence MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RICHMOND NURSING HOME; Boris T. Simmons, Police Officer, 1312-6, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 06-1759.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 26, 2006.
Decided: Sept. 28, 2006.
Clarence Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Michael Barnett, City Attorney’s Office, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Clarence Moore appeals the district court's order denying his "Motion for Consideration of some rights concerning nunc pro tunc" and accompanying submissions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Moore v. Richmond Nursing Home, No. 3:99-cv-00683-RLW (E.D.Va. June 1, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.