Case Name: John v. Dinan Co., Inc., Respondent, v. Dorothy M. Slater, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1928-06-29
Citations: 132 Misc. 454
Docket Number: 
Parties: John V. Dinan Co., Inc., Respondent, v. Dorothy M. Slater, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 132
Pages: 454–455

Head Matter:
John V. Dinan Co., Inc., Respondent, v. Dorothy M. Slater, Appellant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
June 29, 1928.
Edward A. McShane, for the appellant.
Goldberg & Levitt [Arthur Levitt of counsel], for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
There being neither pleading nor proof of compliance by plaintiff with the provisions of the General Business Law (§§ 37-39-o; superseded by Education Law, § 1450, 1467, added by Laws of 1927, chap. 85), the recovery cannot be sustained. (Preiser v. Solomon, 170 N. Y. Supp. 307.)
Judgment and order reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.
Bijur and Lydon, JJ., concur.