Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerry Michael CHANCE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-06-22
Citations: 101 F. App'x 969
Docket Number: No. 03-11056
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerry Michael CHANCE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 101
Pages: 969–970

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerry Michael CHANCE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 03-11056
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
June 22, 2004.
Renee E. Harris, Fort Worth, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Douglas C. Greene, Johnson, Vaughn & Heiskell, Fort Worth, TX, Defendant-Appellant.
Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Jerry Michael Chance appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to commit bank fraud and fraud in relation to social security cards in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. He argues that the district court erred in determining the loss attributable to him as a result of the conspiracy under U.S.S.G. § 2F1.1. He argues that although he helped his coconspirators to repair their poor credit, he did not participate in or benefit from the purchases the coconspirators made with their new good credit. The losses sustained by the creditors who extended credit to Chance's coconspirators were reasonably foreseeable to Chance. See U.S.S.G. § lB1.3(a)(l) & comment. (n.2). Because Chance did not present any rebuttal evidence at the sentencing hearing demonstrating the information in the Presentence Report (PSR) was untrue, the district court was entitled to adopt the information in the PSR without further inquiry. See United States v. Parker, 133 F.3d 322, 329 (5th Cir.1998).
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.