Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven TRAPP, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-09-18
Citations: 76 F. App'x 147
Docket Number: No. 03-10176; D.C. No. CR-02-00507-KJD/RJJ
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven TRAPP, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 76
Pages: 147–148

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven TRAPP, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 03-10176.
D.C. No. CR-02-00507-KJD/RJJ.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 8, 2003.
Decided Sept. 18, 2003.
J. Gregory Damm, Asst. U.S. Atty., U.S. Department of Justice, Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Jason F. Carr, Office of the Federal Public Defendar, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before PREGERSON, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Steven Trapp appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to failure to surrender for service of sentence in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 3146. Trapp contends that the case should be remanded because the district court may not have been aware of its authority under 18 U.S.C. § 3584 to impose a concurrent rather than consecutive sentence. The premise of Trapp's contention is incorrect. The district court was required to impose a consecutive sentence. 18 U.S.C. § 3146(b)(2).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.