Case Name: David M. FINK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Eddie YLST, Warden; et al., Defendants, Ernest Rojo; et al., Defendants, and Bryan Wynn, Sr., aka B.M. Wynn, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-08-01
Citations: 286 F. App'x 498
Docket Number: No. 06-55014
Parties: David M. FINK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Eddie YLST, Warden; et al., Defendants, Ernest Rojo; et al., Defendants, and Bryan Wynn, Sr., aka B.M. Wynn, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 286
Pages: 498–499

Head Matter:
David M. FINK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Eddie YLST, Warden; et al., Defendants, Ernest Rojo; et al., Defendants, and Bryan Wynn, Sr., aka B.M. Wynn, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 06-55014.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 22, 2008.
Filed Aug. 1, 2008.
David M. Fink, Aliso Viejo, CA, pro se.
Cindy S. Lee, Esquire, Jin S. Choi, Esquire, Lawrence Beach Allen & Choi, PC, Glendale, CA, Bryan Wynn, Sr., Moreno Valley, CA, for Defendants.
Before: B. FLETCHER, THOMAS, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
David M. Fink appeals pro se the district court's order denying his "Application for Order for Service of Process by the Sheriff and/or Registered Process Server." We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
Fink sought a writ of execution, which the district court properly issued. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 69(a)(1); Hilao v. Estate of Marcos, 95 F.3d 848, 854 (9th Cir.1996). Fink argues that the writ of execution forms should be amended to make them "self-executing orders." Fink fails to show any reason why he, unlike other successful litigants, is entitled to a special form of writ of execution to recover his money judgment.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.