Case Name: Bill D. MEADOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2010-04-13
Citations: 308 S.W.3d 264
Docket Number: No. ED 93059
Parties: Bill D. MEADOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J. and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 308
Pages: 264–264

Head Matter:
Bill D. MEADOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 93059.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
April 13, 2010.
Ellen H. Flottman, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Karen L. Kramer, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J. and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Bill D. Meador appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would-have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).