Case Name: Alicia BAILEY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-09-16
Citations: 623 So. 2d 1191
Docket Number: No. 81483
Parties: Alicia BAILEY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 623
Pages: 1191–1191

Head Matter:
Alicia BAILEY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 81483.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Sept. 16, 1993.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender and Stephen Krosschell, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Carol M. Dittmar, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We review Bailey v. State, 621 So.2d 680 (Fla. 2d DCA1993), based on a certified question. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We answered the question in Tripp v. State, 622 So.2d 941 (Fla.1993). The decision of the district court of appeal with respect to petitioner's sentencing is accordingly quashed and the case remanded for proceedings consistent with our opinion in Tripp.
It is so ordered.
BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.