Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. JOSEPH ALFRED TORRES, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2000-09-27
Citations: 170 Or. App. 150
Docket Number: C960994CR; CA A105046
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. JOSEPH ALFRED TORRES, Appellant.
Judges: Before De Muniz, Presiding Judge, and Haselton and Wollheim, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 170
Pages: 150–151

Head Matter:
Submitted on record and briefs September 1,
reversed and remanded September 27, 2000
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. JOSEPH ALFRED TORRES, Appellant.
(C960994CR; CA A105046)
11 P3d 268
David E. Groom, Public Defender, and Rankin Johnson IV, Deputy Public Defender, filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General, and Stacy J. Guise, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before De Muniz, Presiding Judge, and Haselton and Wollheim, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant appeals from a judgment revoking his probation, arguing that the trial court erred in requiring him to proceed without counsel at the probation revocation hearing despite his request to speak to an attorney. The state concedes that defendant did not waive his right to counsel and that the trial court erred in revoking defendant's probation under the circumstances. We accept the state's concession of error. See generally State v. Busby, 107 Or App 368, 812 P2d 14 (1991) (defendant is entitled, under Article I, section 11, of the Oregon Constitution, and under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, to counsel at a probation revocation hearing).
Reversed and remanded.