Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Preston FRYE, a/k/a Jamie Frye, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-04-03
Citations: 320 F. App'x 164
Docket Number: No. 08-6730
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Preston FRYE, a/k/a Jamie Frye, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 320
Pages: 164–165

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Preston FRYE, a/k/a Jamie Frye, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-6730.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 25, 2009.
Decided: April 3, 2009.
James Preston Frye, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Ronald Hood, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James Preston Frye appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Frye, No. 3:01-cr-00167-JRS-1 (E.D.Va. Apr. 23, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.