Case Name: Ernesto Canseco AVILA; et al., Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-10-17
Citations: 203 F. App'x 122
Docket Number: Nos. 06-70492, 06-71234
Parties: Ernesto Canseco AVILA; et al., Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: TASHIMA, W. FLETCHER and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 203
Pages: 122–123

Head Matter:
Ernesto Canseco AVILA; et al., Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
Nos. 06-70492, 06-71234.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 12, 2006.
Filed Oct. 17, 2006.
Alma Rosa Nieto, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioners.
CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, OIL, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: TASHIMA, W. FLETCHER and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Respondent's motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.38(b); cf. Oh v. Gonzales, 406 F.3d 611 (9th Cir.2005).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.