Case Name: Flor de Maria AGUILAR-MORALES, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-04-24
Citations: 229 F. App'x 510
Docket Number: No. 05-74046
Parties: Flor de Maria AGUILAR-MORALES, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 229
Pages: 510–510

Head Matter:
Flor de Maria AGUILAR-MORALES, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 05-74046.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 16, 2007 .
Filed April 24, 2007.
Charles E. Mashburn, Esq., Santa Fe Springs, CA, for Petitioner.
District Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, San Diego, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, San Francisco, CA, Douglas E. Ginsburg, Esq., John D. Williams, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, GRABER, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Flor De Maria Aguilar-Morales, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge's decision denying her application for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review.
The BIA issued its decision on April 29, 2005. Because the petition for review was filed more than 30 days later, on July 8, 2005, we lack jurisdiction. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1); Singh v. INS, 315 F.3d 1186, 1188 (9th Cir.2003) (recognizing the time limit for filing a petition for review is mandatory and jurisdictional).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.