Case Name: Bernie A. FAIRCHILD, Appellant, v. Jamie M. FAIRCHILD, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-09-29
Citations: 624 So. 2d 817
Docket Number: No. 92-2615
Parties: Bernie A. FAIRCHILD, Appellant, v. Jamie M. FAIRCHILD, Appellee.
Judges: GUNTHER, FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 624
Pages: 817–817

Head Matter:
Bernie A. FAIRCHILD, Appellant, v. Jamie M. FAIRCHILD, Appellee.
No. 92-2615.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Sept. 29, 1993.
Robert A. Stok of Gest & Stok, P.A., Miami, for appellant.
Val L. Osinski of Law Offices of Val L. Osinski, Coral Springs, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm all issues except the order holding appellant in contempt, which must be reversed because the trial court did not make a finding that he had the ability to pay the purge amount. Bowen v. Bowen, 471 So.2d 1274 (Fla.1985); Knowles v. Knowles, 522 So.2d 477 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).
Reversed.
GUNTHER, FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.