Case Name: LAWRENCE L. PICKENS et al., Petitioners, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SACRAMENTO COUNTY, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1954-03-01
Citations: 42 Cal. 2d 873
Docket Number: Sac. No. 6350
Parties: LAWRENCE L. PICKENS et al., Petitioners, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SACRAMENTO COUNTY, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Reports
Volume: 42
Pages: 873–874

Head Matter:
267 P.2d 819]
[Sac. No. 6350.
In Bank.
Mar. 1, 1954.]
LAWRENCE L. PICKENS et al., Petitioners, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SACRAMENTO COUNTY, Respondent.
F. H. Bowers and Thomas F. Sargent for Petitioners.
McAllister & Johnson and Walter C. Frame for Respondent.

Opinion:
THE COURT.
This is a mandamus proceeding in which the judgments in consolidated actions reviewed on appeal in Pickens v. Johnson, ante, p. 399 [267 P.2d 801], are attacked on one of the grounds urged on that appeal. Inasmuch as the appeal disposes of that issue, the petition for the writ is denied and the alternative writ discharged. (See California Toll Bridge Authority v. Durkee, 40 Cal.2d 341 [253 P.2d 673].)
Dooling, J. pro tem, sat in place of the Chief Justice, who deemed himself disqualified.