Case Name: Tamera McDade, Appellant, v. Peter Wright et al., Respondents, et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2000-01-31
Citations: 268 A.D.2d 570
Docket Number: 
Parties: Tamera McDade, Appellant, v Peter Wright et al., Respondents, et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 268
Pages: 570–570

Head Matter:
Tamera McDade, Appellant, v Peter Wright et al., Respondents, et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.
[702 NYS2d 845]

Opinion:
—In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Bellantoni, J.), entered May 6, 1998, which, upon a jury verdict, dismissed the complaint.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the plaintiffs contention, the computerized axial tomography scan films presented at trial were sufficiently authenticated by witnesses to allow them to be admitted as evidence (see, CPLR 4532-a).
The plaintiffs remaining contention is without merit. Ritter, J. P., Altman, Schmidt and Smith, JJ., concur.