Case Name: THE EXPRESS. THE N. B. STARBUCK. THE CHARM. NEW YORK & CUBA MAIL STEAMSHIP CO. v. THE EXPRESS, THE N. B. STARBUCK, and THE CHARM
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1892-12-13
Citations: 59 F. 476
Docket Number: No. 38
Parties: THE EXPRESS. THE N. B. STARBUCK. THE CHARM. NEW YORK & CUBA MAIL STEAMSHIP CO. v. THE EXPRESS, THE N. B. STARBUCK, and THE CHARM.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter
Volume: 59
Pages: 476–476

Head Matter:
THE EXPRESS. THE N. B. STARBUCK. THE CHARM. NEW YORK & CUBA MAIL STEAMSHIP CO. v. THE EXPRESS, THE N. B. STARBUCK, and THE CHARM.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
December 13, 1892.)
No. 38.
Interest — Affirmance of Decree.
. A party who appeals from a decree in ‘his favor in a collision case is not entitled to interest on the original recovery pending the appeal.
Motion to Amend Mandate.
Denied.
For report of the decision on the appeal, see 3 C. C. A. 342, 52 Fed. 890.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The party who appeals from a decree in his favor in a cause of collision is not entitled to interest on the original recovery pending the appeal. Interest, in such cases, is given for delay in satisfying a decree. The party wrho appeals puts it out of the power of the opposite party to pay the decree. The Rebecca Clyde, 12 Blatchf. 403; Hemmenway v. Fisher, 20 How. 260; The Blenheim, 18 Fed. 47.
The motion to amend the mandate is denied.