Case Name: Vincent DIMEO, James Kinnard, William Knott, James Curran, and Melvin Holland, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Farrell J. GRIFFIN, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Illinois Racing Board, David L. Diana, Ray H. Garrison, Thomas J. Garvey, Ralph Gonzalez, Irwin Jann, Hubert F. Meese, Cecil J. Troy and Dan K. Webb, in their official capacities as members of the Illinois Racing Board, Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1991-05-09
Citations: 931 F.2d 1215
Docket Number: No. 89-3025
Parties: Vincent DIMEO, James Kinnard, William Knott, James Curran, and Melvin Holland, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Farrell J. GRIFFIN, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Illinois Racing Board, David L. Diana, Ray H. Garrison, Thomas J. Garvey, Ralph Gonzalez, Irwin Jann, Hubert F. Meese, Cecil J. Troy and Dan K. Webb, in their official capacities as members of the Illinois Racing Board, Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: Before BAUER, Chief Judge, and CUMMINGS, WOOD, Jr., CUDAHY, POSNER, COFFEY, FLAUM, EASTERBROOK, RIPPLE, MANION and KANNE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 931
Pages: 1215–1216

Head Matter:
Vincent DIMEO, James Kinnard, William Knott, James Curran, and Melvin Holland, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Farrell J. GRIFFIN, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Illinois Racing Board, David L. Diana, Ray H. Garrison, Thomas J. Garvey, Ralph Gonzalez, Irwin Jann, Hubert F. Meese, Cecil J. Troy and Dan K. Webb, in their official capacities as members of the Illinois Racing Board, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 89-3025.
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
May 9, 1991.
Before BAUER, Chief Judge, and CUMMINGS, WOOD, Jr., CUDAHY, POSNER, COFFEY, FLAUM, EASTERBROOK, RIPPLE, MANION and KANNE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
On consideration of the petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc filed March 1, 1991 by counsel for the defendants-appellants in the above-entitled cause, a vote of the active members of the court having been requested, and a majority of the judges in regular active service having voted to GRANT a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the aforesaid petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc be, and the same are hereby, GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the judgment and opinion entered in this case on February 4, 1991, 924 F.2d 664, be, and are hereby, VACATED. This case will be reheard en banc at the convenience of the court.