Case Name: Joseph J. Hartman, complainant and respondent, v. Anna M. Hartman, defendant and appellant
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1908-11-16
Citations: 74 N.J. Eq. 851
Docket Number: 
Parties: Joseph J. Hartman, complainant and respondent, v. Anna M. Hartman, defendant and appellant.
Judges: For affirmance — Ti-ie Chancellor, Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reep, Trencharp, Parker, Bergen, Voori-iees,-Minturn, Bogert, Vrepenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill —16.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 74
Pages: 851–851

Head Matter:
Joseph J. Hartman, complainant and respondent, v. Anna M. Hartman, defendant and appellant.
[Argued June 18th, 1908.
Decided November 16th, 1908.]
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Stevens, whose opinion is reported in 71 All. Rep. 417.
Mr. Ohau-ncy IL. Beasley and Mr. Samuel J. McDonald, for the appellant.
Mr. Charles F. Herr, Mr. James M. Trimble and Mr. Samuel Iialisch, for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This case involves only questions of fact. We agree with the conclusions of the learned vice-chancellor. The decree under review should therefore be affirmed.
The application for counsel fee is denied.
For affirmance — Ti-ie Chancellor, Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reep, Trencharp, Parker, Bergen, Voori-iees,-Minturn, Bogert, Vrepenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill —16.
For reversal — None.