Case Name: In the Matter of Philip Sopolsky et al., Appellants. Mary Rappaport, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1952-06-10
Citations: 280 A.D. 765
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Philip Sopolsky et al., Appellants. Mary Rappaport, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 280
Pages: 765–765

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Philip Sopolsky et al., Appellants. Mary Rappaport, Respondent.

Opinion:
Order affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to respondents. No opinion. Present — Cohn, J. P., Callahan, Van Voorhis, Heffernan and Bergan, JJ.; Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ., dissent and vote to modify in the following memorandum: Assuming that the 5% return was justified and within the discretion of the court we think the court erred in disallowing sums expended in maintaining and operating the property for lighting, painting and janitor services and a proper allowance in those respects would increase the rent fixed to the sum of $1,375 per annum.