Case Name: EDWARD A. KING, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. HOWARD YEAGER, WARDEN NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1964-03-17
Citations: 41 N.J. 595
Docket Number: 
Parties: EDWARD A. KING, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. HOWARD YEAGER, WARDEN NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 41
Pages: 595–596

Head Matter:
EDWARD A. KING, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. HOWARD YEAGER, WARDEN NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Argued March 2, 1964
Decided March 17, 1964.
Mr. Samuel Kagel, a member of the Pennsylvania Bar, argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Mr. Ivan G. Bash, attorney).
Mr. Gregory J. Castaño, Assistant Prosecutor of Hudson County, argued the cause for defendant-respondent (Mr. James A. Tumulty, Jr., Prosecutor, attorney).

Opinion:
The opinion of the court was delivered
Per Curiam.
The defendant appeals from the refusal of the Hudson County Court to issue a writ of habeas corpus and adjudicate the case on its merits.
The issues now raised are identical with the issues heretofore raised and adjudicated on appeal to this court. State v. King, 37 N. J. 285 (1962). The posing of these questions in pseudo-constitutional guise adds nothing new for consideration.
Affirmed.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Hane-man—7.
For reversal—None.