Case Name: Phyllis E. DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-08-11
Citations: 765 So. 2d 258
Docket Number: No. 5D00-1860
Parties: Phyllis E. DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 765
Pages: 258–258

Head Matter:
Phyllis E. DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D00-1860.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Aug. 11, 2000.
Phylhs E. Davis, South Florida, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.

Opinion:
THOMPSON, C.J.
Phyllis E. Davis appeals from the summary denial of her motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). She sought relief based on Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000). We affirm.
Davis' motion does not adequately set forth a basis for relief because she has failed to allege that the sentence imposed could not have been imposed under the 1994 guidelines. See Parker v. State, 767 So.2d 532 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000). Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's order, but without prejudice to Davis' refiling a facially sufficient rule 3.800(a) motion.
AFFIRMED.
PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.