Case Name: In re Jose Nacacio AMU, a/k/a Amu, a/k/a Sld Dft 3:97-40-11, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-05-14
Citations: 603 F. App'x 202
Docket Number: No. 15-1289
Parties: In re Jose Nacacio AMU, a/k/a Amu, a/k/a Sld Dft 3:97-40-11, Petitioner.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 603
Pages: 202–202

Head Matter:
In re Jose Nacacio AMU, a/k/a Amu, a/k/a Sld Dft 3:97-40-11, Petitioner.
No. 15-1289.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 7, 2015.
Decided: May 14, 2015.
Jose Nacacio Amu, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jose Nacacio Amu petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court's docket reveals that the district court recently denied Amu's motion for a sentence reduction based on Amendment 782, and the court previously denied him a sentence reduction based on Amendment 750. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Amu's case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.