Case Name: Ira C. WILLIAMS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY and Sally Librera, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-10-22
Citations: 620 F. App'x 63
Docket Number: No. 14-3876
Parties: Ira C. WILLIAMS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY and Sally Librera, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: PRESENT: CHESTER J. STRAUB, RICHARD C. WESLEY and DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 620
Pages: 63–63

Head Matter:
Ira C. WILLIAMS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY and Sally Librera, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 14-3876.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Oct. 22, 2015.
Irene Donna Thomas, Thomas & Associates, Brooklyn, NY, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Robert K Drinan, Assistant General Counsel, for Lewis S. Finkelman, General Counsel, New York City Transit Authority, New York, NY, for Defendants-Appel-lees.
PRESENT: CHESTER J. STRAUB, RICHARD C. WESLEY and DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
SUMMARY ORDER
Plaintiff-Appellant Ira C. Williams, Jr. ("Williams") appeals a grant of summary judgment in favor of-his employer, Defendant-Appellee New York City Transit Authority ("NYCTA"), and Defendanb-Appel-lee Sally Librera ("Librera"), an Acting Assistant Vice President of Operations-Training within the NYCTA. Williams's action against the NYCTA and Librera (collectively, the "Defendants") comprised a variety of race and age discrimination claims, including a retaliation claim, brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and 1983, and New York state law. Williams's grievances were based on Librera's recommendation of a white man eleven years younger than Williams for promotion to a certain director position within the NYC-TA.
For substantially the reasons stated by the court below, we find no error in the granting of Defendants' motion and dismissal of Williams's complaint. We therefore AFFIRM the judgment of the District Court.