Case Name: In the Matter of YELLOWSTONE MOUNTAIN CLUB, LLC, Debtor. Brian A. Glasser, Trustee of the Yellowstone Club Liquidating Trust, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Timothy L. Blixseth, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-02-09
Citations: 634 F. App'x 601
Docket Number: No. 16-35034
Parties: In the Matter of YELLOWSTONE MOUNTAIN CLUB, LLC, Debtor. Brian A. Glasser, Trustee of the Yellowstone Club Liquidating Trust, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Timothy L. Blixseth, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: GRABER, RAWLINSON, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 634
Pages: 601–602

Head Matter:
In the Matter of YELLOWSTONE MOUNTAIN CLUB, LLC, Debtor. Brian A. Glasser, Trustee of the Yellowstone Club Liquidating Trust, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Timothy L. Blixseth, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-35034.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted and Filed Feb. 9, 2016.
Kevin W. Barrett, Esquire, Bailey & Glasser LLP, Charleston, WV, Robert R. Bell, Mullin, Hoard and Brown, Amarillo, TX, Charles William Hingle, I, Esquire, Holland & Hart LLP, Billings, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Phillip John Defelice, Law Office of Phillip Defelice, Havre, MT, Michael John Ferrigno, Law Office of Michael J. Ferrig-no PLLC, Meridian, ID, Philip H. Still-man, Esquire, Stillman & Associates, Miami Beach, FL, Defendant-Appellant.
Before: GRABER, RAWLINSON, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Upon review of the response to the court's January 19, 2016 order to show cause and the briefs, we conclude that Blixseth's appeal from the district court's December 30, 2015 order is not reviewable as. a recalcitrant witness appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1826. .Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See United States v. Craddick, 842 F.2d 1157 (9th Cir.1988); SEC v. Elmas Trading Corp., 824 F.2d 732 (9th Cir.1987).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R, 36-3.