Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ramiro ANTUNEZ-PINEDA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-01-11
Citations: 628 F. App'x 738
Docket Number: No. 15-12110
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ramiro ANTUNEZ-PINEDA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before HULL, WILSON and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 628
Pages: 738–739

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ramiro ANTUNEZ-PINEDA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-12110
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Jan. 11, 2016.
Sandra E. Strippoli, John Andrew Horn, Lawrence R. Sommerfeld, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Colette Resnik Steel, The Steel Law Firm, PC, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before HULL, WILSON and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Colette Resnik Steel, appointed counsel for Ramiro Antunez-Pineda, in this direct criminal appeal, as moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Antunez-Pineda's conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.