Case Name: STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. MARC E. GRACE, Defendant
Court: Montana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Montana
Decision Date: 2001-07-31
Citations: 308 Mont. 62
Docket Number: No. CDC-98-274
Parties: STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. MARC E. GRACE, Defendant,
Judges: Chairman, Hon. Jeffrey H. Langton, Member, Hon. David Cybulski and Member, Hon. Katherine R. Curtis.
Reporter: Montana Reports
Volume: 308
Pages: 62–63

Head Matter:
FROM: The District Court of the 8th Judicial District. County of Cascade.
STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. MARC E. GRACE, Defendant,
No. CDC-98-274

Opinion:
Decision
On May 18, 1999, the defendant was sentenced to the following: Count I: Twenty (20) years in the Montana State Prison; and Count II: Five (5) years in the Montana State Prison, to run concurrent to Count I.
On July 19, 2001, the defendant's application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
The defendant was present and was advised of his right to be represented by counsel. The defendant proceeded pro se. The state was not represented.
Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.
DATED this 31st day of July, 2001.
Done in open Court this 19th day of July, 2001.
Rule 17 of the Ruies of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that "the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive." (§46-18-904(3), MCA).
The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.
Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.
Chairman, Hon. Jeffrey H. Langton, Member, Hon. David Cybulski and Member, Hon. Katherine R. Curtis.