Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Espere PIERRE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-05-05
Citations: 687 F. App'x 880
Docket Number: No. 15-13182 Non-Argument Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Espere PIERRE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before HULL, WILSON, and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 687
Pages: 880–881

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Espere PIERRE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-13182 Non-Argument Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
(May 5, 2017)
Olivia Choe, Wifredo A. Ferrer, Seth Michael Schlessinger, Emily M. Smachetti, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Roy Jeffrey Kahn, Roy J. Kahn, PA, Miami, FL, for Defendant-Appellant Willis Maxi
David Scott Markus, Law Offices of David Marcus, Miami, FL, for Defendant-Appellant Markentz Blanc
Before HULL, WILSON, and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
James Gailey, appointed counsel for Es-pere Pierre, in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to with draw is GRANTED, and Pierre's convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.