Case Name: Olynyk v. Andrish
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2006-06-21
Citations: 109 Ohio St. 3d 1509
Docket Number: 2006-0235
Parties: Olynyk v. Andrish.
Judges: Pfeifer, J., dissents.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 109
Pages: 1509–1510

Head Matter:
2006-0235.
Olynyk v. Andrish.

Opinion:
Cuyahoga App. No. 86009, 2005-Ohio-6632. Reported at 109 Ohio St3.d 1420, 2006-Ohio-1967, 846 N.E.2d 531. On motion for reconsideration. Motion for reconsideration granted to the following extent:
The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals' Journal Entry filed January 9, 2006:
"Whether the double dismissal rule contained in Rule 41(A) of the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure applies to plaintiffs voluntary dismissal of claims pursuant to Rule 41(A)(2) of the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure."
Pfeifer, J., dissents.
The conflict case is Van Beusecum v. Continental Builders, Delaware App. No. 04-CAE-01-008, 2004-Ohio-7261.
Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2006-0310, Olynyk v. Andrish, Cuyahoga App. No. 86009, 2005-Ohio-6632.