Case Name: LYDIA VAN SICKELL, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. PETER J. STAATS ET AL., DEFENDANTS IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1890-06
Citations: 52 N.J.L. 559
Docket Number: 
Parties: LYDIA VAN SICKELL, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. PETER J. STAATS ET AL., DEFENDANTS IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 52
Pages: 559–560

Head Matter:
LYDIA VAN SICKELL, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. PETER J. STAATS ET AL., DEFENDANTS IN ERROR.
On error to the Supreme Court.
Eor the plaintiff in error, Theodore B. Booraem.
.Eor the defendants in error, Alan H. Strong.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the-reasons duly given by that court.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Dixon, Garrison, Magie, Reed, Van Syokel, Brown, Clement, Cole,. Smith, Whitaker. 11.
For reversal—None.