Case Name: Laurence J. BERSHAD and Morris E. Gossett, Appellants, v. Bernard KAMBER, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1916-04-11
Citations: 158 N.Y.S. 1108
Docket Number: 
Parties: Laurence J. BERSHAD and Morris E. Gossett, Appellants, v. Bernard KAMBER, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 158
Pages: 1108–1108

Head Matter:
Laurence J. BERSHAD and Morris E. Gossett, Appellants, v. Bernard KAMBER, Respondent.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.
April 11, 1916.)
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Seventh District. Action by Laurence J. Bershad and Morris E. Gossett against Bernard Ka.mber. From a judgment for defendant dismissing the complaint upon the opening to the jury of plaintiffs’ counsel, plaintiffs appeal. Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
An examination of the complaint herein shows that a good cause of action was stated therein and there was nothing in the opening of plaintiffs' counsel to the jury which in any way destroyed or impaired the sufficiency of the complaint. Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellant to abide the event.