Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles Emanuel RASH, a/k/a Chaz, a/k/a Charlie, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-09-03
Citations: 393 F. App'x 997
Docket Number: No. 10-6309
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles Emanuel RASH, a/k/a Chaz, a/k/a Charlie, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 393
Pages: 997–998

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles Emanuel RASH, a/k/a Chaz, a/k/a Charlie, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-6309.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 26, 2010.
Decided: Sept. 3, 2010.
Charles Emanuel Rash, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Charles Emanuel Rash appeals the district court's orders denying his "Motion for Judicial Recommendation Regarding Designation for Service of Federal Sentence" and subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Rash, No. 3:01-cr-00025-JPB-DJJ-1 (N.D. W. Va. Jan. 28 & Feb. 16, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.