Case Name: LOVE v. SPENCER
Court: Texas Courts of Civil Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1925-05-14
Citations: 273 S.W. 883
Docket Number: No. 3079
Parties: LOVE v. SPENCER.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 273
Pages: 883–884

Head Matter:
LOVE v. SPENCER.
(No. 3079.)
(Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Texarkana.
May 14, 1925.)
1. Appeal and error <@=>569(I) — Statement of facts, not signed by trial judge, not considered.
Statement of facts, not signed by trial judge, cannot be considered on appeal.
2. Appeal and error <&wkey;548(2) — No reversal for error in admission of testimony, In absence of statement of facts.
In absence of statement of facts, appellate court cannot say that error, if any, in, admission of testimony requires , reversal.
Appeal from Delta County Court; Chas. B. Berry, Judge.
Action by R. M. Love, as receiver of the Farmers’ National Bank of Cooper, against J. J. Spencer. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.
Affirmed.
James, Clower & Ratliff, of Cooper, for appellant.
O. C. McKinney, of Cooper, and Dial, Mel-son, Davidson & Brim, of Sulphur Springs, for appellee.

Opinion:
HODGES, J.
R. M. Love, as receiver of the Farmers' National Bank of Cooper, filed this suit against the appellee, Spencer, for conversion of mortgaged property. It was alleged that the bank held a mortgage given by pne A. H. Morehead on two mules, and that these were purchased and converted by Spencer. It is further alleged that, at the time of the purchase, Spencer had both actual and constructive notice of the existence of the mortgage. In response to special issues submitted, the jury found that the mules were not included within the terms of the mortgage offered in evidence, and a judgment was rendered in favor of the defendant below.
There is in the record sent to this court what purports to he a statement of facts, but it is not signed by the trial judge, and for that reason cannot be here considered.
Appellant complains of the admission of some testimony, but in the absence of a statement of facts, we cannot say the error, if any, required a reversal of the judgment, and it is accordingly affirmed.
<g=»Por other cases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes