Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher MITCHELL, a/k/a Hassan Jones, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-08-20
Citations: 475 F. App'x 475
Docket Number: No. 12-6817
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Christopher MITCHELL, a/k/a Hassan Jones, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 475
Pages: 475–475

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Christopher MITCHELL, a/k/a Hassan Jones, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 12-6817.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 9, 2012.
Decided: Aug. 20, 2012.
Christopher Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. John J. Frail, Steven Loew, Assistant United States Attorneys, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Mitchell appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Mitchell, No. 2:90-cr-00020-2 (S.D.W.Va. Apr. 18, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.