Case Name: Orlando Ira BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA, State of, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-01-20
Citations: 589 F. App'x 190
Docket Number: No. 14-2155
Parties: Orlando Ira BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA, State of, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 589
Pages: 190–190

Head Matter:
Orlando Ira BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA, State of, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 14-2155.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 15, 2015.
Decided: Jan. 20, 2015.
Orlando Brown, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Orlando Brown appeals the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's report and recommendation and dismissing without prejudice his discrimination complaint against the State of South Carolina as barred by res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. South. Carolina, No. 3:13-cv-02983-MBS (D.S.C. Sept. 24, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.