Case Name: Terry L. SLAUGHTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tom L. CAREY, Warden, California State Prison Solano; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-03-13
Citations: 58 F. App'x 354
Docket Number: No. 02-16360; D.C. No. CV-02-00051-FCD/DAD
Parties: Terry L. SLAUGHTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tom L. CAREY, Warden, California State Prison Solano; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 58
Pages: 354–354

Head Matter:
Terry L. SLAUGHTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tom L. CAREY, Warden, California State Prison Solano; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 02-16360.
D.C. No. CV-02-00051-FCD/DAD.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 10, 2003.
Decided March 13, 2003.
Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and T. G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Terry L. Slaughter, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U. S.C. § 1983 action alleging that prison officials violated his constitutional rights. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1117 (9th Cir. 2003), and we affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Slaughter's action without prejudice because Slaughter failed to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing suit. See McKinney v. Carey, 311 F.3d 1198, 1199-1200 (9th Cir.2002) (per curiam).
Slaughter's remaining contentions lack merit.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.