Case Name: Michael B. SCHLUETER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2015-10-20
Citations: 472 S.W.3d 653
Docket Number: No. ED 102348
Parties: Michael B. SCHLUETER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 472
Pages: 653–654

Head Matter:
Michael B. SCHLUETER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 102348
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Filed: October 20, 2015
Erika R. Eliason, Woodrail Center, 1000 W. Nifong, Bldg. 7 Suite 100, Columbia, Missouri 65203, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Evan J. Buchheim, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 889, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102, for Respondent,
Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Michael Schlueter appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Schlueter raises one point on appeal, asserting that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because there was no factual basis in the plea-court record to support his guilty pleas for first-degree child molestation, and thus his guilty pleas were involuntary, unknowing, and unintelligent. We affirm.
The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).