Case Name: Loring R. Millen, et al., Respondents v. John C. Fogg, et al., Appellants
Court: New York Superior Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1891-03-02
Citations: 27 Jones & S. 578
Docket Number: 
Parties: Loring R. Millen, et al., Respondents v. John C. Fogg, et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Reports of cases argued and determined in the Superior Court of the city of New York
Volume: 59
Pages: 578–578

Head Matter:
Loring R. Millen, et al., Respondents v. John C. Fogg, et al., Appellants.
Decided March 2, 1891.
Appeal by defendants from an order of reference granted on the ground that the trial of the action would involve the taking of a long account.
Morrison & Kennedy, for appellants.
Alexander & Green, for respondents.
Before Sedgwick, Ch. J., Truax and Dugro, JJ.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Although the only specific allegation that there were no difficult questions of law was made by the plaintiff who was not a lawyer, yet the character of the case, as disclosed by all the papers, showed there were no such questions. Welch v. Darragh, 52 N. Y. 590, and other cases required that the judge below should make the order appealed from. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs.