Case Name: Lillie F. Heyl, individually and trading as the Asbury Diner, complainant-respondent, v. Culinary Alliance Local 611, affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, Nick Pappas, Leo Willitte, Kingdon Waters, Sherman Turner, Harry Mockridge and Gerard Corbo, defendants-appellants
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1939-10-26
Citations: 126 N.J. Eq. 320
Docket Number: 
Parties: Lillie F. Heyl, individually and trading as the Asbury Diner, complainant-respondent, v. Culinary Alliance Local 611, affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, Nick Pappas, Leo Willitte, Kingdon Waters, Sherman Turner, Harry Mockridge and Gerard Corbo, defendants-appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 126
Pages: 320–321

Head Matter:
Lillie F. Heyl, individually and trading as the Asbury Diner, complainant-respondent, v. Culinary Alliance Local 611, affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, Nick Pappas, Leo Willitte, Kingdon Waters, Sherman Turner, Harry Mockridge and Gerard Corbo, defendants-appellants.
[Argued May 24th, 1939
Decided October 26th, 1939.]
Mr. Ross R. Beclc and Mr. Peter Cooper, for the complainant-respondent.
Messrs. Parsonnet & Oberwager (Mr. Thomas L. Parson-net), for the defendants-appellants.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Complainant is the owner and operator of a restaurant of the type commonly known as a "diner." On November 21st, 1938, such of her employes as were members of the defendant union walked out. Picketing immediately followed. Chancery, on the filing of complainant's bill for injunction and the submission of proofs, allowed an order to show cause and on the return thereof found that complainant had employed new workers to take the place of all the strikers, that the business was being continued normally and that consequently there was no longer a strike, whereupon it issued a restraint pendente lile. The appeal is from that restraint order.
The case is subject to the comments and to the same disposition as are being made concurrently herewith in Kitty Kelly Shoe Corp. v. United Retail, &c., Local 108, 126 N. J. Eq. 318.
The order under appeal will be reversed and the cause remanded.
For affirmance — None.
For reversal — The Chiee-Justice, Paekee, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Peeskie, Postee, Heteield, Deae, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeeety, Hague, JJ. 14.