Case Name: In re NOMINATION Paper OF Ralph NADER and Peter Miguel Camejo as Candidates of an Independent Political Body for President and Vice President in the General Election of November 2, 2004. Linda S. Serody, Roderick J. Sweets, Ronald Bergman, Richard Trinclisti, Terry Trinclisti, Bernie Cohen-Scott, Donald G. Brown and Julia A. O'Connell. Appeal of Ralph Nader and Peter Miguel Camejo, and Their Independent Electors
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2004-10-19
Citations: 860 A.2d 1
Docket Number: 
Parties: In re NOMINATION Paper OF Ralph NADER and Peter Miguel Camejo as Candidates of an Independent Political Body for President and Vice President in the General Election of November 2, 2004. Linda S. Serody, Roderick J. Sweets, Ronald Bergman, Richard Trinclisti, Terry Trinclisti, Bernie Cohen-Scott, Donald G. Brown and Julia A. O’Connell. Appeal of Ralph Nader and Peter Miguel Camejo, and Their Independent Electors.
Judges: BEFORE: CAPPY, C.J., and CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN, SAYLOR, EAKIN and BAER, JJ.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 860
Pages: 1–10

Head Matter:
In re NOMINATION Paper OF Ralph NADER and Peter Miguel Camejo as Candidates of an Independent Political Body for President and Vice President in the General Election of November 2, 2004. Linda S. Serody, Roderick J. Sweets, Ronald Bergman, Richard Trinclisti, Terry Trinclisti, Bernie Cohen-Scott, Donald G. Brown and Julia A. O’Connell. Appeal of Ralph Nader and Peter Miguel Camejo, and Their Independent Electors.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Oct. 19, 2004.
Michelle Stirman Pierson, Esq., Marcus James Lemon, Esq., J. Matthew Wolfe, Esq., Ronald Lee Hicks, Jr., Esq., Andrew Lee Noble, Michael Edward Barrett, Basil Culyba, pro hac vice, Ross A. Dreyer, pro hac vice, James L. Cook, III, for & Peter Miguel Camejo Ralph Nader.
Jeffrey John Bresch, Esq., William S. Gordon, Esq., Christopher K. Walters, Esq., Daniel I. Booker, Esq., Ira Steven Lefton, Esq., Pittsburgh, for Linda S. Ser-ody.
Jeremy David Feinstein, Esq., Milind Madhukar Shah, Esq., Barbara Kiely, Esq., Pittsburgh, for Roderick J. Sweets.
Efrem M. Grail, Esq., Nicholas R. Saba-tine, III, Esq., Pittsburgh, for Ronald Bergman.
Cynthia E. Kernick, Esq., James Michael Doerfler, Esq., Andrea Beth Simon-son, Pittsburgh, for Richard Trinclisti.
Melissa Joy Oretsky, Philadelphia, for Bernie Cohen-Scott.
Mark Lawrence Tamburri, Esq., John M. McIntyre, Pittsburgh, for Terry Trin-clisti.
Kim M. Watterson, Esq., Lisa M. Cam-poli, James P. Williamson, Pittsburgh, for Donald G. Brown.
Brian Anthony Gordon, Esq., Gregory M. Harvey, Esq., Philadelphia, for Julia A. O’Connell.
Louis Lawrence Boyle, Esq., for Bureau of Commissions, Elections and Legislation.
Gerald J. Pappert, Esq., Harrisburg, for Commonwealth of PA.
BEFORE: CAPPY, C.J., and CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN, SAYLOR, EAKIN and BAER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 19th day of October, 2004, the Order of the Commonwealth Court dated October 13, 2004, is affirmed. The Application For Supersedeas is denied. The Application For Intervention is dismissed as moot.
Justice SAYLOR dissents. Dissenting Statement to Follow.