Case Name: DEL MONTE DUNES AT MONTEREY, LTD., et al., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF MONTEREY, Defendant-Appellant; DEL MONTE DUNES AT MONTEREY, LTD., and Monterey-Del Monte Dunes Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF MONTEREY, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1997-06-26
Citations: 118 F.3d 660
Docket Number: Nos. 94-16248, 94-16313
Parties: DEL MONTE DUNES AT MONTEREY, LTD., et al., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF MONTEREY, Defendant-Appellant. DEL MONTE DUNES AT MONTEREY, LTD., and Monterey-Del Monte Dunes Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF MONTEREY, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before: WALLACE and LEAVY, Circuit Judges, and BAIRD, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 118
Pages: 660–661

Head Matter:
DEL MONTE DUNES AT MONTEREY, LTD., et al., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF MONTEREY, Defendant-Appellant. DEL MONTE DUNES AT MONTEREY, LTD., and Monterey-Del Monte Dunes Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF MONTEREY, Defendant-Appellee.
Nos. 94-16248, 94-16313.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
June 26, 1997.
Before: WALLACE and LEAVY, Circuit Judges, and BAIRD, District Judge.
Honorable Lourdes G. Baird, United States District Judge, Central District ol California, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
The petition for rehearing is granted. No further briefing is required. The parties shall be prepared to argue, for no more than 20 minutes per side, the following issue:
Whether the jury, rather than the judge, can decide if the City of Monterey's actions substantially advanced a public purpose. (See part IIIB. of our opinion.)
Arguments shall be held in San Fransisco on August 6, 1997, at 10:00 a.m. The parties shall direct any further questions to the Clerk of the Court.