Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Derrick BAILEY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-03-16
Citations: 598 F. App'x 749
Docket Number: No. 14-14129
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Derrick BAILEY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MARTIN, JULIE CARNES and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 598
Pages: 749–750

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Derrick BAILEY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 14-14129
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
March 16, 2015.
Michelle Lee Schieber, Danial Edward Bennett, Tamara A. Jarrett, Michael J. Moore, U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s'Office, Macon, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Charles E. Cox, Jr., Charles E. Cox, Jr., LLC, Macon, GA, Derrick Bailey, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before MARTIN, JULIE CARNES and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Charles E. Cox, Jr., counsel for Derrick Bailey, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, • counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, 'and Bailey's conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.