Case Name: Gregorio Rendon HELGUERA; et al., Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-02-24
Citations: 172 F. App'x 711
Docket Number: No. 04-76028
Parties: Gregorio Rendon HELGUERA; et al., Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, GOODWIN and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 172
Pages: 711–712

Head Matter:
Gregorio Rendon HELGUERA; et al., Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 04-76028.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 21, 2006.
Filed Feb. 24, 2006.
Gregorio Rendon Helguera, Corona, CA, pro se.
Norma Perez Pantaleon, Corona, CA, pro se.
CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, GOODWIN and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
This is a petition for review of the denial of petitioners' applications for cancellation of removal. We have reviewed petitioners' opening brief.
Respondent's motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.