Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. SUSAN M. HOVESKELAND, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1989-11-22
Citations: 99 Or. App. 486
Docket Number: P060126, P060127; CA A60739, A60740
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. SUSAN M. HOVESKELAND, Appellant.
Judges: Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Newman and Deits, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 99
Pages: 486–487

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted October 27,
reversed and remanded for new trial November 22,1989
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. SUSAN M. HOVESKELAND, Appellant.
(P060126, P060127; CA A60739 (Control), A60740)
(Cases Consolidated)
782 P2d 957
Henry M. Silberblatt, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.
Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.
Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Newman and Deits, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant appeals her convictions for driving under the influence of intoxicants, ORS 813.010, and driving without a valid license. ORS 807.010. She contends that the court erred by denying her motion to suppress evidence that was made on the ground that the officer did not have a reasonable suspicion to support his stop of the vehicle that she was driving. The state concedes that the court erred. We agree.
Reversed and remanded for new trial.