Case Name: William Baader, administrator, &c., complainant-appellant, v. Antonio Mascellino et al., defendants-respondents
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1935-10-09
Citations: 119 N.J. Eq. 84
Docket Number: 
Parties: William Baader, administrator, &c., complainant-appellant, v. Antonio Mascellino et al., defendants-respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 119
Pages: 84–85

Head Matter:
William Baader, administrator, &c., complainant-appellant, v. Antonio Mascellino et al., defendants-respondents.
[Submitted May 31st, 1935.
Decided October 9th, 1935.]
Messrs. Rinaldi & Shanley, for the complainant-appellant.
Messrs. Herr & Kaufmann and Mr. James J. Quinn, for the defendants-respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This is an appeal from a decree of the court of chancery dismissing a bill filed to set aside the conveyance of certain lands and the transfer of a mortgage. We have examined the proofs and concur in the conclusion of the learned vice-chancellor that the evidence did not sustain the allegations of the bill. We are, therefore, of the opinion that the bill of complaint was properly dismissed.
The decree is affirmed.
For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Preskie, Van Buskirk, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 15.
For reversal—None.