Case Name: Charles NUNLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2014-04-29
Citations: 429 S.W.3d 484
Docket Number: No. ED 100219
Parties: Charles NUNLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J. and GLENN A. NORTON, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 429
Pages: 484–484

Head Matter:
Charles NUNLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 100219.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District.
April 29, 2014.
Tim Forneris, Saint Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Evan J. Buchheim, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J. and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Charles Nunley appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).