Case Name: Margaret Farrell, Respondent, v. Francis Farrell, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1976-12-28
Citations: 55 A.D.2d 586
Docket Number: 
Parties: Margaret Farrell, Respondent, v Francis Farrell, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 55
Pages: 586–586

Head Matter:
Margaret Farrell, Respondent, v Francis Farrell, Appellant.

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered July 6, 1976, unanimously modified, in the interest of justice and exercise of discretion, to vacate that portion thereof which denied defendant-appellant's application for assignment of counsel to defend plaintiff-respondent's suit for divorce and to remand with a direction that Special Term so appoint counsel without fee, and otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The application was to open defendant husband's default, to allow him to proceed as a poor person, and to assign counsel whose fee would come from public funds. There is no constitutional right to the latter aspect (see Smiley v Smiley, 45 AD2d 785) relied on by Special Term. However, defendant has established indigency beyond doubt, and, "in the circumstances, counsel should have been assigned in accordance with the Bar's traditional responsibility 'to willingly accept assignments to help those who cannot afford financially to help themselves.' Jacox v Jacox, 43 AD2d 716." (Yearwood v Yearwood, 54 AD2d 626). The Legal Aid Society, which represents defendant-appellant on this appeal, is not able in the current financial stringency, to accept assignment of an unlimited number of cases of this kind without compensation, and it becomes necessary for the Bar, as of old, to fulfill its longtime duty. (See, in this regard, 100th Ann Report, Legal Aid Society, 1975-1976, and discussion in XXII NY Law School L Rev, Justice for the Poor, pp 96-98, The Problem in Divorce Litigation.) Concur—Stevens, P. J., Markewich, Kupferman, Birns and Capozzoli, JJ.