Case Name: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ESO M. RHAMS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1954-01-11
Citations: 14 N.J. 282
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ESO M. RHAMS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 14
Pages: 282–291

Head Matter:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ESO M. RHAMS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Argued January 4, 1954
Decided January 11, 1954.
Mr. John F. Ryan argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Ryan & Saros, attorneys).
Mr. Hyman Isaac argued the cause for respondent (Mr. H. Russell Morss, attorney).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Brennan in the Superior Court, Appellate Division.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Heher, Oliphant, Jacobs and Brennan — 5.
For reversal — Justices Wachenfeld and Burling — 2.