Case Name: KING COLE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant, v. USPLATE GLASS INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2010-08-18
Citations: 45 So. 3d 833
Docket Number: No. 3D09-2390
Parties: KING COLE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant, v. USPLATE GLASS INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.
Judges: Before CORTIÑAS and ROTHENBERG, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 45
Pages: 833–836

Head Matter:
KING COLE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant, v. USPLATE GLASS INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.
No. 3D09-2390.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Aug. 18, 2010.
Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied Oct. 29, 2010.
Katzman Garfinkel Rosembaum and Richard Valuntas and Joseph W. Jassen, III, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Butler Pappas Weihmuller Katz Craig and Anthony J. Russo and L. Andrew Watson, Tampa, for appellee.
Before CORTIÑAS and ROTHENBERG, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The summary judgment for the defendant insurer entered below is reversed because of the existence of genuine issues of material fact concerning coverage and alleged defenses, including but not limited to compliance with the notice and proof of loss provisions of the policy. See Bankers Ins. Co. v. Macias, 475 So.2d 1216 (Fla.1985); Solano v. Fed. Title & Ins. Co., 229 So.2d 312 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969); Bray & Gillespie IX, LLC v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 2009 WL 1513400 (M.D.Fla.2009).
Reversed and remanded.
CORTINAS, J, and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge, concur.