Case Name: The STATE of Texas, Appellee, v. Nathaniel WASHINGTON, Appellant
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1991-10-02
Citations: 816 S.W.2d 431
Docket Number: No. 669-91
Parties: The STATE of Texas, Appellee, v. Nathaniel WASHINGTON, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 816
Pages: 431–432

Head Matter:
The STATE of Texas, Appellee, v. Nathaniel WASHINGTON, Appellant.
No. 669-91.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.
Oct. 2, 1991.
Randy Schaffer, on appeal only, Houston, for appellant.
John B. Holmes, Jr., Dist. Atty., Alan Curry and Suzanne Stanley, Asst. Dist. At-tys., Houston, Robert Huttash, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
ORDER WITHDRAWING OPINION ON STATE'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
PER CURIAM.
Appellant was convicted by a jury of possession of cocaine. The trial court assessed punishment, enhanced by two prior convictions, at forty-five years imprisonment. This conviction was reversed and remanded for a new assessment of punishment. Washington v. State, (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] No. 14-90-487-CR, delivered April 4, 1991).
In a per curiam opinion, delivered September 11,1991, we summarily granted the State's petition for discretionary review and remanded the cause to the court of appeals for reconsideration in light of our opinion on rehearing in Reed v. State, 811 S.W.2d 582 (Tex.Cr.App.1991). However, on September 16, 1991, the State informed us that the court of appeals, pursuant to Tex.R.App.Proc. 101, had already reconsidered and corrected its prior opinion and judgment. See Washington v. State, 810 S.W.2d 313 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1991).
We, therefore, withdraw our previous opinion, delivered September 11, 1991, and dismiss the State's petition as moot.