Case Name: In the Matter of M. V., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. M. V., Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2008-10-15
Citations: 223 Or. App. 256
Docket Number: 080160819; A138095
Parties: In the Matter of M. V., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. M. V., Appellant.
Judges: Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Schuman, Judge, and Ortega, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 223
Pages: 256–257

Head Matter:
Submitted September 5,
reversed October 15, 2008
In the Matter of M. V., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. M. V., Appellant.
Multnomah County Circuit Court
080160819; A138095
195 P3d 912
Lance D. Perdue filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Pamela J. Walsh, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Schuman, Judge, and Ortega, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
In this mental commitment case, appellant contends that the record lacks clear and convincing evidence that, at the time of the civil commitment hearing, she met the statutory definition of a "mentally ill person" who suffers from a mental disorder that causes her to be unable to meet her basic needs, ORS 426.005(1)(d). The state concedes that the record lacks such clear and convincing evidence. On de novo review, State v. Miller, 198 Or App 153, 155, 107 P3d 683 (2005), we agree that the evidence is legally insufficient.
Reversed.