Case Name: Mark Anthony BELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mr. BROOKS, Warden; John Doe, Institutional Doctor; Ms. Appante, Hospital Administrator, Defendants-Appellees, and Ms. Apontay, Medical Administrator, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-10-06
Citations: 144 F. App'x 362
Docket Number: No. 05-6524
Parties: Mark Anthony BELL, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Mr. BROOKS, Warden; John Doe, Institutional Doctor; Ms. Appante, Hospital Administrator, Defendants—Appellees, and Ms. Apontay, Medical Administrator, Defendant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 144
Pages: 362–363

Head Matter:
Mark Anthony BELL, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Mr. BROOKS, Warden; John Doe, Institutional Doctor; Ms. Appante, Hospital Administrator, Defendants—Appellees, and Ms. Apontay, Medical Administrator, Defendant.
No. 05-6524.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 29, 2005.
Decided: Oct. 6, 2005.
Mark Anthony Bell, Appellant Pro Se. Anita Claire Snyder, Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Mark Anthony Bell appeals the district court's order denying relief on his Bivens complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bell v. Brooks, No. CA-03-938-1 (E.D.Va. Mar. 14, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971).