Case Name: UNION SQUARE BANK OF CITY OF NEW YORK v. REICHMANN
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1893-05-12
Citations: 23 N.Y.S. 531
Docket Number: 
Parties: UNION SQUARE BANK OF CITY OF NEW YORK v. REICHMANN.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 23
Pages: 531–531

Head Matter:
UNION SQUARE BANK OF CITY OF NEW YORK v. REICHMANN.
(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.
May 12, 1893.)
Appeal from special term, New York county.
Action by the Union Square Bank of the City of New York against Theodor Reichmann, J. Harvey Bostwick, and Charles Rieclc, to recover $2,500 and interest on a promissory note alleged to have been made by defendants, composing the firm of Bostwick, Rieck & Co. From an order denying a motion to vacate a warrant of attachment, defendant Reichmann appeals.
Affirmed.
Argued before VAN BRUNT, P. J., and FOLLETT, J.
A. W. Kent, for appellant
Fromme Bros., for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The order appealed from should be affirmed, with $10 cos Is and disbursements, for the reasons stated in the opinion in the case of Bank v. Stebbins, 23 N. Y. Supp. 529, (decided herewith.)