Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bobby Michael GILYARD, a/k/a Big Mike, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-10-04
Citations: 541 F. App'x 305
Docket Number: No. 13-7192
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bobby Michael GILYARD, a/k/a Big Mike, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 541
Pages: 305–306

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bobby Michael GILYARD, a/k/a Big Mike, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-7192.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 24, 2013.
Decided: Oct. 4, 2013.
Bobby Michael Gilyard, Appellant Pro Se. Alan Lance Crick, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Bobby Michael Gilyard appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence in which he sought relief under the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 ("FSA"). We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court properly determined Gilyard was not entitled to relief. See United States v. Bullard, 645 F.3d 237, 248 (4th Cir.2011) (holding that the FSA does not apply retroactively to defendants sentenced prior to its effective date). Accordingly, we affirm. We further deny Gilyard's motions for abeyance and appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.