Case Name: EARL PRICKETT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT v. MATILDA ALLARD, THE ISSUES OF MATILDA ALLARD NOW OR HEREAFTER BORN DURING THE LIFETIME OF MATILDA ALLARD, THEIR HEIRS, DEVISEES, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES AND THEIR OR ANY OF THEIR SUCCESSORS IN RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST; THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1974-10-22
Citations: 66 N.J. 6
Docket Number: 
Parties: EARL PRICKETT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT v. MATILDA ALLARD, THE ISSUES OF MATILDA ALLARD NOW OR HEREAFTER BORN DURING THE LIFETIME OF MATILDA ALLARD, THEIR HEIRS, DEVISEES, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES AND THEIR OR ANY OF THEIR SUCCESSORS IN RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST; THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 66
Pages: 6–6

Head Matter:
EARL PRICKETT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT v. MATILDA ALLARD, THE ISSUES OF MATILDA ALLARD NOW OR HEREAFTER BORN DURING THE LIFETIME OF MATILDA ALLARD, THEIR HEIRS, DEVISEES, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES AND THEIR OR ANY OF THEIR SUCCESSORS IN RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST; THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Argued September 9, 1974
Decided October 22, 1974.
Mr. George L. Seltzer argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Valentine and Seltzer, attorneys).
No appearance was made on behalf of respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons exressed by the Appellate Division, 126 N. J. Super. 438.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Hughes and Justices Jacobs, Hall, Mountain, Sullivan, Pashman and Clie-eokd — 7.
For reversal — Vi one.