Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNDER SEAL, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-01-22
Citations: 709 F. App'x 192
Docket Number: No. 17-7020
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNDER SEAL, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 709
Pages: 192–192

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNDER SEAL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 17-7020
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: January 18, 2018
Decided: January 22, 2018
Under Seal, Appellant Pro Se. Kristine Dietz Cowherd, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland; David Ira Salem, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying her motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) and Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Under Seal, No. 8:97-cr-00193-PWG-10 (D. Md. July 7, 2017). We deny. Appellant's motions for the production of transcripts at government expense and for reconsideration of our prior order deferring ruling on this motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED