Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Walter Alexander Ejcalon XALCUT, also known as Chapin, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-07-18
Citations: 693 F. App'x 363
Docket Number: No. 16-20593 Summary Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Walter Alexander Ejcalon XALCUT, also known as Chapin, Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before PRADO, HAYNES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 693
Pages: 363–364

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Walter Alexander Ejcalon XALCUT, also known as Chapin, Defendant-Appellant
No. 16-20593 Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed July 18, 2017
Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Walter Alexander Ejcalon Xalcut, Pro Se
Before PRADO, HAYNES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Walter Alexander Ej calón Xalcut has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance -with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ejcal-on Xalcut has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cíe. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.