Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rashundria J. BURKES, a/k/a Roe, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-07-25
Citations: 693 F. App'x 251
Docket Number: No. 17-6399
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rashundria J. BURKES, a/k/a Roe, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 693
Pages: 251–252

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rashundria J. BURKES, a/k/a Roe, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 17-6399
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 20, 2017
Decided: July 25, 2017
Rashundria J. Burkes, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley, Jr., Jimmie Ewing, Stanley D. Ragsdale, Assistant United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina; Carrie Fisher Sherard, Assistant United States Attorney, Andrew- Burke Moorman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina; Mark C. Moore, NEXSEN PRUET, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Rashundria J. Burkes appeals the district court's order denying her 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Burkes, No. 6:10-cr-00296-HMH-11 (D.S.C. Mar. 7, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED