Case Name: REYNOLDS v. UNITED STATES
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1922-04-21
Citations: 282 F. 860
Docket Number: No. 2927
Parties: REYNOLDS v. UNITED STATES.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter
Volume: 282
Pages: 860–861

Head Matter:
REYNOLDS v. UNITED STATES.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
April 21, 1922.)
No. 2927.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Illinois.
Tom Reynolds was adjudged guilty of contempt of court for violating an injunctional order, and he brings error.
Affirmed.
Charles O. Spencer, of Chicago, 111., plaintiff in error.
Chas. F. Clyne and C. W. Middlekauff, both of Chicago, 111., for the United States.
Before ABSCHULER, EVANS, and PAGE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff in error was adjudged guilty of contempt of coui't for disobeying an injunctional order restraining him from maintaining a common nuisance in violation of the National Prohibition Act (41 Stat. 305). The recent decisions of this court in Lewinsohn v. U. S., 278 Fed. 421; Allen v. U. S.. 278 Fed. 429, Grossman v. U. S., 280 Fed. 683, Shore v. U, S., 282 Fed. 857, and Heitler v. U. S., 280 Fed. 703, determine practically all of the assignments of error adversely to plaintiff in error.
As to the remaining assignment of error, it appears that defendant did not take the stand to dispute the testimony offered by the government, and we are satisfied that the finding is supported by the evidence.
The judgment is affirmed.