Case Name: George W. PALMER, Appellant, v. Howard M. COMSTOCK et al., Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1968-04-16
Citations: 394 F.2d 395
Docket Number: No. 22084
Parties: George W. PALMER, Appellant, v. Howard M. COMSTOCK et al., Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 394
Pages: 395–396

Head Matter:
George W. PALMER, Appellant, v. Howard M. COMSTOCK et al., Appellees.
No. 22084.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
April 16, 1968.
Rehearing Denied May 23, 1968.
Edward D. O’Brian (argued), Anaheim, Cal., for appellant.
Jack R. Winkler (argued), Deputy Atty. Gen., Doris H. Maier, Asst. Atty. Gen., Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen., Sacramento, Cal., for appellee.
Before MADDEN, Judge of the United States Court of Claims, and MERRILL and BROWNING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The district court's judgment dismissing appellant's petition for habeas corpus is affirmed on the ground that appellant has not exhausted available state remedies. Morehead v. State of California, 339 F.2d 170 (9th Cir. 1964).