Case Name: HERBERT LIGHTHIPE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. CITY OF ORANGE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1908-11-16
Citations: 76 N.J.L. 817
Docket Number: 
Parties: HERBERT LIGHTHIPE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. CITY OF ORANGE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 76
Pages: 817–818

Head Matter:
HERBERT LIGHTHIPE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. CITY OF ORANGE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Submitted July 6, 1908
Decided November 16, 1908.
On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 46 Yroom 365.
For the plaintiff in error, William A. Lad.
For the defendant in error, Ghauncey G. Parher.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review in this case is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Pitney in the court below.
For affirmance—The Chiee Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reed, Trenoi-iard, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Yroom, Green, Gray, Dill, J.J. 15.
For reversal—Fone.