Case Name: Robert N. GRESHAM, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2017-06-01
Citations: 220 So. 3d 1133
Docket Number: No. SC16-359
Parties: Robert N. GRESHAM, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 220
Pages: 1133–1133

Head Matter:
Robert N. GRESHAM, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. SC16-359
Supreme Court of Florida.
[June 1, 2017]
Thomas A. Burns of Burns, P.A., Tampa, Florida, for Petitioner
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, and Michael Schaub, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, for Respondent

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the First District Court of Appeal in Gresham v. State, 181 So.3d 1207 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction.
It is so ordered.
LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.
CANADY, J., concurs in result.