Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Wayne Nuness, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1990-03-16
Citations: 159 A.D.2d 970
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Wayne Nuness, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 159
Pages: 970–970

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Wayne Nuness, Appellant.

Opinion:
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Upon our review of the record we conclude that the identification evidence presented was legally sufficient and was supported by the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). Additionally, we find that defendant was provided meaningful representation (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147). Trial counsel's failure to preserve a Rosario issue (see, People v Rosario, 9 NY2d 286, rearg denied 9 NY2d 908, cert denied 368 US 866) did not, standing alone, render counsel's assistance ineffective (see, People v Montana, 71 NY2d 705, 709). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Marshall, J. — robbery, second degree.) Present — Denman, J. P., Pine, Lawton, Davis and Lowery, JJ.