Case Name: Pierre T. PIPES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2018-12-26
Citations: 564 S.W.3d 402
Docket Number: No. ED 106328
Parties: Pierre T. PIPES, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Philip M. Hess, P.J. and Robert G. Dowd, Jr. and Mary K. Hoff, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 564
Pages: 402–403

Head Matter:
Pierre T. PIPES, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 106328
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Filed: December 26, 2018
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: Kristina S. Olson, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.
ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Julia E. Neidhardt, Asst. Attorney General, P. O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899.
Before Philip M. Hess, P.J. and Robert G. Dowd, Jr. and Mary K. Hoff, JJ.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Pierre Pipes appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm.
An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).