Case Name: Ovel PILOTO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2003-04-23
Citations: 842 So. 2d 1055
Docket Number: No. 4D01-2631
Parties: Ovel PILOTO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: GUNTHER, SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 842
Pages: 1055–1056

Head Matter:
Ovel PILOTO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D01-2631.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
April 23, 2003.
Steven W. Gomberg of the Law Office of Steven W. Gomberg, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and August A. Bonavita, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm in all respects, except with regard to Piloto's conviction for possession of burglary tools. On this issue, the State failed to present a prima facie case because the evidence presented did not prove that the tools were used, or were intended to be used, in a burglary. § 810.06, Fla. Stat. (2001). Because the State's evidence was insufficient to prove that Piloto at least intended to use the tools found in the van to perpetrate a burglary, his conviction on this count is reversed and remanded for discharge. See Latimore v. State, 753 So.2d 690 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).
AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED FOR DISCHARGE.
GUNTHER, SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.