Case Name: Ida M. Stolze, Respondent, v. C. R. Stolze et al., Appellants
Court: Washington Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Washington
Decision Date: 1920-07-07
Citations: 111 Wash. 699
Docket Number: No. 15821
Parties: Ida M. Stolze, Respondent, v. C. R. Stolze et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Washington Reports
Volume: 111
Pages: 699–699

Head Matter:
[No. 15821.
Department Two.
July 7, 1920.]
Ida M. Stolze, Respondent, v. C. R. Stolze et al., Appellants.
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Card, J., entered March 2, 1920, denying a motion to vacate a judgment.
Affirmed.
Guy E. Kelly and Thomas McMahon, for appellants.
P. L. Pendleton, for respondent.
Reported in 191 Pac. 641.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The facts and questions of law involved in this appeal are substantially the same as those involved in the case of Stolze v. Stolze, ante p. 398, 191 Pac. 641 (Serial No. 15819). What we said in that case is applicable to this and the disposition of that case must control the disposition of this. For the reasons given in that case, the judgment here appealed from is affirmed.