Case Name: Alejandra HERNANDEZ-OCAMPO, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-03-24
Citations: 90 F. App'x 986
Docket Number: No. 02-71096
Parties: Alejandra HERNANDEZ-OCAMPO, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 90
Pages: 986–987

Head Matter:
Alejandra HERNANDEZ-OCAMPO, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 02-71096.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 15, 2004.
Decided March 24, 2004.
Antonio Reyna Salazar, Esq., Salazar Law Offices, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner.
Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Lagu-na Niguel, CA, Ronald E. LeFévre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, WWS — District Counsel, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Office of the District Counsel, Seattle, WA, Audrey B. Hemesath, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before B. FLETCHER, LEAVY, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Alejandra Hernandez-Oeampo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") summary affirmance of an immigration judge's denial of her application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition for review.
Hernandez-Ocampo's sole contention on appeal is that the BIA's streamlining regulations violate her procedural due process rights. This contention is foreclosed by Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft, 350 F.3d 845, 851 (9th Cir.2003).
The clerk is directed to stay the mandate pending the resolution of Desta v. Ashcroft, No. 03-70477 and further order of this Court.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.