Case Name: Jacob L. RAGLAND, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2018-05-29
Citations: 547 S.W.3d 823
Docket Number: No. ED 105736
Parties: Jacob L. RAGLAND, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Lisa P. Page, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J. and Philip M. Hess, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 547
Pages: 823–823

Head Matter:
Jacob L. RAGLAND, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 105736
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Filed: May 29, 2018
FOR APPELLANT: Maleaner R. Harvey, Missouri Public Defender's Office, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101.
FOR RESPONDENT: Gregory L. Barnes, Assistant Attorney General, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.
Before Lisa P. Page, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J. and Philip M. Hess, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Jacob Ragland appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. Ragland raises three points on appeal claiming the motion court erred because his trial counsel was ineffective for (1) untimely requesting jurors be allowed to take notes, (2) failing to examine various witnesses regarding one of the victims, J.F., seeing his mother ("Mother"), engage in sexual intercourse, and (3) failing to examine various witnesses regarding J.F. watching pornography. Finding no error, we affirm.
An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).