Case Name: Vidonio MERCADO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1983-03-01
Citations: 427 So. 2d 338
Docket Number: No. 82-1682
Parties: Vidonio MERCADO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before HUBBART, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 427
Pages: 338–338

Head Matter:
Vidonio MERCADO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 82-1682.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 1, 1983.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Ginsburg, Nagin & Rosin, Coral Gables, and Stephen Rosin, Sp. Asst. Public Defenders, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Faith Mesne-koff, Certified Legal Intern, and Diane Leeds, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before HUBBART, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Mullins v. State, 366 So.2d 1162 (Fla.1978) (Alderman, J., concurring), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 883, 100 S.Ct. 173, 62 L.Ed.2d 113 (1979); Wright v. State, 418 So.2d 1087 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Neely v. State, 402 So.2d 477 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); Login v. State, 394 So.2d 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); State v. Ramos, 378 So.2d 1294 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).
We have examined the issue presented by the cross-appeal and find the cross-appeal to be without merit.