Case Name: Ronnie PARKER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2007-08-28
Citations: 235 S.W.3d 575
Docket Number: No. ED 89122
Parties: Ronnie PARKER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER, III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 235
Pages: 575–575

Head Matter:
Ronnie PARKER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 89122.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Aug. 28, 2007.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 15, 2007.
Ronnie Parker, Charleston, MO, pro se.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Lisa M. Kennedy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER, III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Ronnie Parker appeals from the trial court's denial of his Motion to Re-open his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court was justified in denying his motion to reopen his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. Edgington v. State, 189 S.W.3d 703, 707 (Mo.App. W.D.2006). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2006, unless otherwise indicated.