Case Name: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. Ronald Lee WILLIAMS, a/k/a Ronald Hicks, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1978-07-14
Citations: 479 Pa. 372
Docket Number: No. 578
Parties: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. Ronald Lee WILLIAMS, a/k/a Ronald Hicks, Appellant.
Judges: Before EAGEN, C. J, and O’BRIEN, ROBERTS, POMEROY, NIX, MANDERINO and PACKEL, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 479
Pages: 372–374

Head Matter:
388 A.2d 702
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. Ronald Lee WILLIAMS, a/k/a Ronald Hicks, Appellant.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued Nov. 17, 1977.
Decided July 14, 1978.
David F. Dunn, Allentown, for appellant.
George J. Joseph, Dist. Atty., Wardell F. Steigerwalt, Asst. Dist. Atty., James B. Martin, Allentown, for appellee.
Before EAGEN, C. J, and O’BRIEN, ROBERTS, POMEROY, NIX, MANDERINO and PACKEL, JJ.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
EAGEN, Chief Justice.
On September 25, 1972, appellant, Ronald Lee Williams, was convicted by a jury in Lehigh County of being an accessory before and after the fact to forging stolen money orders and an accessory before the fact to counterfeiting an American Express Traveler's check. Following a denial of post-verdict motions, a prison sentence was imposed. Williams' direct appeal to the Superior Court resulted in an affirmance of the judgment without opinion, Commonwealth v. Williams, 231 Pa.Super. 804, 331 A.2d 526 (1975).
Later in 1975, Williams filed a petition in the trial court seeking post conviction relief, Act of January 25, 1966, P.L. (1965) 1580 § 1 et seq., 19 P.S. § 1180-1 et seq. After a counseled evidentiary hearing, the petition was dismissed. On appeal the Superior Court affirmed without opinion. We granted allocatur and reinstated Williams' bail pending disposition of the appeal. We now affirm the order of the Superior Court for this reason.
Williams contends he is entitled to a new trial because his self-retained trial counsel failed to provide "competent representation." However, a check of the records discloses that this issue' was not raised in the direct appeal to the Superior Court from the judgment of sentence and that Williams was there represented by new counsel, that is, counsel other than trial counsel. Under the circumstances, the issue has been waived. Commonwealth v. Seachrist, 478 Pa. 621, 387 A.2d 661 (1978); Commonwealth v. May, 476 Pa. 385, 382 A.2d 1223 (1978); Commonwealth v. Smallwood, 465 Pa. 392, 350 A.2d 822 (1976); Commonwealth v. Dancer, 460 Pa. 95, 335 A.2d 435 (1975).
Order affirmed. The order of May 27, 1976, reinstating bail is vacated.
PACKEL, former J., did not participate in the decision of this case.
NIX, J., concurs in the result.
This is the only reason asserted in support of the request for post conviction relief.