Case Name: William BYNES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-07-03
Citations: 581 So. 2d 654
Docket Number: No. 90-1846
Parties: William BYNES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 581
Pages: 654–654

Head Matter:
William BYNES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 90-1846.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
July 3, 1991.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Daniel J. Schafer, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and David S. Morgan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
GRIFFIN, Judge.
We agree with defendant that the information charging burglary and petit theft of property of Mr. Cajigas should not have been consolidated for trial with the crimes perpetrated on Treskovich and Schweir; accordingly the convictions for burglary and petit theft in case no. 89-7581 are reversed and remanded for a new trial. Finfrock v. State, 507 So.2d 1230 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987). There is no merit to appellant's other points on appeal.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ., concur.