Case Name: In the Matter of the Marriage of Luella Mae HISE, Appellant, and George Earl HISE, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1990-06-20
Citations: 102 Or. App. 272
Docket Number: 88P-2239; CA A50474
Parties: In the Matter of the Marriage of Luella Mae HISE, Appellant, and George Earl HISE, Respondent.
Judges: Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Warren and Rossman, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 102
Pages: 272–273

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted September 14, 1989, judgment modified;
affirmed as modified June 20, 1990
In the Matter of the Marriage of Luella Mae HISE, Appellant, and George Earl HISE, Respondent.
(88P-2239; CA A50474)
972 P2d 487
Joseph E. Penna, Monmouth, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.
Russell Lipetzky, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Paul Saucy, P.C., Salem.
Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Warren and Rossman, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
In this dissolution proceeding, we agree with wife that the amounts of permanent spousal support and child support awarded by the trial court are too low. On de novo review, we modify the judgment to require husband to pay permanent spousal support of $200 per month and child support of $200 per month per child. The judgment is affirmed in all other respects.
Judgment modified to require husband to pay permanent spousal support of $200 per month and to provide child support of $200 per month per child from the date of the original judgment; affirmed as modified. Costs, not including attorney fees, to wife.
This opinion issued originally on October 11, 1989. Hise and Hise, 98 Or App 758, 779 P2d 1106 (1989). After it was issued, the court received notice of a pending bankruptcy proceeding involving one of the parties. On November 20, 1989, we withdrew our opinion and ordered that the appeal be abated, pending receipt of notice that the bankruptcy proceeding had terminated or that the bankruptcy court had granted relief from the automatic stay. See ORCP 12.35. Having received notice that the bankruptcy proceeding has now terminated, we are reissuing the decision.