Case Name: Eddie Lee SEXTON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1994-09-28
Citations: 643 So. 2d 53
Docket Number: No. 94-03167
Parties: Eddie Lee SEXTON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: DANAHY, A.C.J., and PARKER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 643
Pages: 53–53

Head Matter:
Eddie Lee SEXTON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 94-03167.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Sept. 28, 1994.
Robert Fraser, Tampa, for petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and Kimberly D. Nolen, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner seeks certiorari review of the circuit court's order compelling him to provide reciprocal discovery of matters pertaining to the penalty phase of this capital case. He essentially contends that Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.220 does not apply to the penalty phase of a trial. We disagree and concur with our sister court's holding in Booker v. State, 634 So.2d 301 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).
Petition denied.
DANAHY, A.C.J., and PARKER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.