Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Brian Antwanine JOHNSON, a/k/a Fudd, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-05-01
Citations: 324 F. App'x 214
Docket Number: No. 08-8265
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Brian Antwanine JOHNSON, a/k/a Fudd, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 324
Pages: 214–214

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Brian Antwanine JOHNSON, a/k/a Fudd, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-8265.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 23, 2009.
Decided: May 1, 2009.
Brian Antwanine Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Gordon D. Kromberg, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Brian Antwanine Johnson appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Johnson, No. 1:98-cr-00283-LMB-1 (E.D.Va. Oct. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.