Case Name: Shuri STONECIPHER, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Terrill ROBERTS and Terese Roberts, Defendants, and Vicki Benson Real Estate Professionals, LLC, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2017-12-12
Citations: 534 S.W.3d 922
Docket Number: No. ED 105095
Parties: Shuri STONECIPHER, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Terrill ROBERTS and Terese Roberts, Defendants, and Vicki Benson Real Estate Professionals, LLC, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before James M. Dowd, C.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lawrence E. Mooney, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 534
Pages: 922–923

Head Matter:
Shuri STONECIPHER, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Terrill ROBERTS and Terese Roberts, Defendants, and Vicki Benson Real Estate Professionals, LLC, Defendant/Respondent.
No. ED 105095
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, NORTHERN DIVISION.
Filed: December 12, 2017
John W. Russell, 230 5th St., Suite A, P.O. Box 161, Monroe City, MO 63456-0161, for appellant.
Jeffrey O. Parshall, W. Tyler Dunn, 3210 Bluff Creek Drive, Columbia, MO 65201-3525, for respondent.
Before James M. Dowd, C.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lawrence E. Mooney, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
The plaintiff, Shuri Stonecipher, appeals the summary judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Knox County in favor of defendant, Vicki Benson Real Estate Professionals, LLC, ("the realty agency") in this suit for fraud, civil conspiracy, and unlawful merchandising practices in connection with the plaintiffs purchase of a home from defendants, Terrill and Terese Roberts, and listed for sale by the realty agency. The trial court certified its judgment for immediate appeal pursuant to Rule 74.01(b), finding that it fully disposed of all issues, rights, and interests between the plaintiff and the realty agency and finding no just reason for delay. Finding no error, we affirm.
An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. We affirm the trial court's judgment. Rule 84.16(b)(5).