Case Name: Ronnie BYRD, Defendant/Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-01-30
Citations: 36 S.W.3d 443
Docket Number: No. ED 76686
Parties: Ronnie BYRD, Defendant/Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent.
Judges: Before MARY K. HOFF, C.J., CRANE, J., and ROBERT E. CRIST, Sr J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 36
Pages: 443–443

Head Matter:
Ronnie BYRD, Defendant/Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent.
No. ED 76686.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Jan. 30, 2001.
S. Paige Canfield, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Linda Lemke, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before MARY K. HOFF, C.J., CRANE, J., and ROBERT E. CRIST, Sr J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Ronnie Byrd, movant, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties and find the motion court's judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).