Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gilberto RAMIREZ-CHAVEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-06-14
Citations: 184 F. App'x 532
Docket Number: No. 04-6399
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gilberto RAMIREZ-CHAVEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: RYAN and COLE, Circuit Judges; and SARGUS, District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 184
Pages: 532–532

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gilberto RAMIREZ-CHAVEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 04-6399.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
June 14, 2006.
James W. Powell, Asst. U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Jackson, TN, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
J. Patten Brown, III, Asst. Federal Public Defender, Office of the Federal Public Defender for the Western District of Tennessee, Memphis, TN, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: RYAN and COLE, Circuit Judges; and SARGUS, District Judge.
The Honorable Edmund A. Sargus, Jr., United States District Judge for the Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
SARGUS, District Judge.
Appellant Gilberto Ramirez-Chavez contends, and the government does not dispute, that he was sentenced prior to the decision in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), in violation of the Sixth Amendment. The parties agree that a remand is appropriate for resentencing under Booker.
The sentence is VACATED and this case is remanded for resentencing in light of Booker.
. Appellant's counsel stated during a telephonic oral argument that Ramirez-Chavez was withdrawing his first assignment of error which challenged a sixteen-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A). Consequently, the Court does not address this issue.