Case Name: Josef ROHLIK and Marie Rohlik, Respondents/Cross Appellants, v. Brian BURKETT and Jeffrey W. Hales, Jr., Appellants/Cross Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2015-11-03
Citations: 474 S.W.3d 220
Docket Number: No. ED 102423
Parties: Josef ROHLIK and Marie Rohlik, Respondents/Cross Appellants, v. Brian BURKETT and Jeffrey W. Hales, Jr., Appellants/Cross Respondents.
Judges: Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr,, P.J. and Mary K. Hoff and Roy L. Richter, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 474
Pages: 220–220

Head Matter:
Josef ROHLIK and Marie Rohlik, Respondents/Cross Appellants, v. Brian BURKETT and Jeffrey W. Hales, Jr., Appellants/Cross Respondents.
No. ED 102423
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Filed: November 3, 2015
W. Bevis Schock, 7777 Bonhomme Avenue, Suite 1300, Clayton, MO 63105, Attorneys for Appellant.
Michael Q. Murphy, 8909 Ladue Road, St. Louis, MO 63124, Attorneys for Respondent.
Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr,, P.J. and Mary K. Hoff and Roy L. Richter, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.'
Brian Burkett and Jeffrey Hales, Jr. ("Appellants") appeal from the trial court's judgment finding Josef and Maire Rohlik acquired certain real property through adverse possession. The Rohliks cross-appeal, arguing the' trial court's award of an easement by necessity to Appellants was improper.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the trial court did not err. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with,Rule 84.16(b).