Case Name: David Keith BUFF, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Jon E. Ozmint, Director; Unknown Director; Elbert Pearson, Security Threat Group Coordinator; McKither Bodison, Warden; Wayne McCabe, Warden; Ralph Hunter, Associate Warden; Fred Thompson, Associate Warden; Eugene Skipper, Sergeant; Jamana Ravenell, Caseworker, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-12-19
Citations: 491 F. App'x 408
Docket Number: No. 12-7597
Parties: David Keith BUFF, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Jon E. Ozmint, Director; Unknown Director; Elbert Pearson, Security Threat Group Coordinator; McKither Bodison, Warden; Wayne McCabe, Warden; Ralph Hunter, Associate Warden; Fred Thompson, Associate Warden; Eugene Skipper, Sergeant; Jamana Ravenell, Caseworker, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 491
Pages: 408–409

Head Matter:
David Keith BUFF, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Jon E. Ozmint, Director; Unknown Director; Elbert Pearson, Security Threat Group Coordinator; McKither Bodison, Warden; Wayne McCabe, Warden; Ralph Hunter, Associate Warden; Fred Thompson, Associate Warden; Eugene Skipper, Sergeant; Jamana Ravenell, Caseworker, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 12-7597.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 13, 2012.
Decided: Dec. 19, 2012.
David Keith Buff, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Lindemann, DAVIDSON & LIN-DEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
David Keith Buff appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Buff v. S.C. Dep't of Corr., 2012 WL 3029628 (D.S.C. July 25, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.