Case Name: Marcus Albinus JOSEPH, a/k/a Marcus A. Joseph, a/k/a Marcus Albines Joseph, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Henry M. TURBEVILLE; Annelle G. Powell, Magistrate Judge in Clarendon County; Gary Martin; Wade S. Kolb; Joseph Coker; SCDC Director Stirling; Warden Bernard McKie, of Kirkland Correctional Institution, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-10-20
Citations: 620 F. App'x 175
Docket Number: No. 15-6935
Parties: Marcus Albinus JOSEPH, a/k/a Marcus A. Joseph, a/k/a Marcus Albines Joseph, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Henry M. TURBEVILLE; Annelle G. Powell, Magistrate Judge in Clarendon County; Gary Martin; Wade S. Kolb; Joseph Coker; SCDC Director Stirling; Warden Bernard McKie, of Kirkland Correctional Institution, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 620
Pages: 175–175

Head Matter:
Marcus Albinus JOSEPH, a/k/a Marcus A. Joseph, a/k/a Marcus Albines Joseph, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Henry M. TURBEVILLE; Annelle G. Powell, Magistrate Judge in Clarendon County; Gary Martin; Wade S. Kolb; Joseph Coker; SCDC Director Stirling; Warden Bernard McKie, of Kirkland Correctional Institution, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15-6935.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 15, 2015.
Decided: Oct. 20, 2015.
Marcus Albinus Joseph, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Marcus Albinus Joseph appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice as frivolous his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Joseph v. Turbeville, No. 2:15-cv-00412-RMG (D.S.C. May 19, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.