Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. RAYMOND R. ORTEGON, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1980-07-14
Citations: 47 Or. App. 21
Docket Number: No. C 79-01-30313, CA 14686
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. RAYMOND R. ORTEGON, Appellant.
Judges: Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Joseph, Warden, and Warren, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 47
Pages: 21–23

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted March 17,
affirmed July 14,
reconsideration denied August 21,
petition for review denied November 10, 1980 (290 Or 149)
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. RAYMOND R. ORTEGON, Appellant.
(No. C 79-01-30313, CA 14686)
613 P2d 112
David L. Slader, Portland, argued and cause and filed the brief for appellant.
John C. Bradley, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were James A. Redden, Attorney General, and Walter L. Barrie, Solicitor General, Salem.
Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Joseph, Warden, and Warren, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
The defendant appeals his conviction of robbery in the second degree. We have examined the entire record in this case, and while some of defendant's assignments of error do arguably have some technical merit, we conclude that any errors were not prejudicial. The evidence of defendant's guilt was so overwelming as to require affirmance. ORS 19.125; Or Const Art VII, § 3.
Affirmed.