Case Name: In re OWEN
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1928-04-02
Citations: 25 F.2d 776
Docket Number: No. 2038
Parties: In re OWEN.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 25
Pages: 776–776

Head Matter:
In re OWEN.
Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.
Submitted March 13, 1928.
Decided April 2, 1928.
No. 2038.
B. F. Garvey, of Washington, D. C., for appellant.
T. A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB and VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justices.

Opinion:
ROBB, Associate Justice.
Appeal from a decision of the Patent Office refusing to allow appellant's application for a design patent in the form of an electric storage battery container.
The container is a plain, rectangular receptacle, with a handle projecting from the top of each end.
Section 4929, R. S., as amended (35 USCA § 73; Comp. St. § 9475), provides that "any person who has invented any new, original, and ornamental design for an article of manufacture, not known or used by others in this country before his invention thereof, and not patented or described in any printed publication in this or any foreign country before his invention thereof, may, upon payment of the fees required by law and other due proceedings had, obtain a patent therefor."
To entitle one to a design patent, there must be "originality and beauty. Mere mechanical skill is insufficient." Smith v. Whitman Saddle Co., 148 U. S. 674, 13 S. Ct. 768, 37 L. Ed. 606. See, also, H. C. White Co. v. M. E. Converse & Sons Co. (C. C. A.) 20 F.(2d) 311.
As observed by the Commissioner, handles were old, and the mere substitution of applicant's handle, which differs little in design from the handles of the prior art, does not involve invention.
The decision is affirmed.
Affirmed.