Case Name: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Arlene FLACH, Defendant/Appellant, and Laura J. Burge, Richard L. Flach, Jr., Cindy F. Miller, Kenneth E. Flach and Douglas I. Flach, Defendants/Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-10-16
Citations: 62 S.W.3d 494
Docket Number: No. ED 79404
Parties: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Arlene FLACH, Defendant/Appellant, and Laura J. Burge, Richard L. Flach, Jr., Cindy F. Miller, Kenneth E. Flach and Douglas I. Flach, Defendants/Respondents.
Judges: Before GEORGE W. DRAPER III, P.J., MARY R. RUSSELL, and MARY K. HOFF, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 62
Pages: 494–494

Head Matter:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Arlene FLACH, Defendant/Appellant, and Laura J. Burge, Richard L. Flach, Jr., Cindy F. Miller, Kenneth E. Flach and Douglas I. Flach, Defendants/Respondents.
No. ED 79404.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Oct. 16, 2001.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 28, 2001.
Application for Transfer Denied Jan. 22, 2002.
Robert J. Selsor, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Robert O. Appleton, Jr., David M. Stol-ze, Clayton, Carl C. Pohle, Clayton, MO, Jeana D. McFerron, David W. Gearhart, St. Louis, MO, for respondents.
Before GEORGE W. DRAPER III, P.J., MARY R. RUSSELL, and MARY K. HOFF, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Arlene Flach appeals from the grant of summary judgment in a suit to interpret provisions of a will that created a trust under which her husband was a beneficiary. She alleges that the trial court erred in finding that her stepchildren were each entitled to an undivided one-fifth interest in the trust estate in that a later provision of the will required the trustee to provide for her support. We find no error and affirm.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. We have, however, furnished the parties with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).