Case Name: Anthony Jo-Allen McCOY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. B. ULEP, Doctor, Sussex I State Prison, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-11-26
Citations: 547 F. App'x 229
Docket Number: No. 13-7149
Parties: Anthony Jo-Allen McCOY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. B. ULEP, Doctor, Sussex I State Prison, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 547
Pages: 229–229

Head Matter:
Anthony Jo-Allen McCOY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. B. ULEP, Doctor, Sussex I State Prison, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 13-7149.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 21, 2013.
Decided: Nov. 26, 2013.
Anthony Jo-Allen McCoy, Appellant Pro Se.
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Jo-Allen McCoy appeals the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action for noncompliance with a court order. A plaintiffs failure to comply with an order of the court may warrant involuntary dismissal. Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b). We review a district court's dismissal under Rule 41(b) for abuse of discretion. Ballard v. Carlson, 882 F.2d 93, 95-96 (4th Cir.1989). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See McCoy v. Ulep, No. 3:12-cv-00883-JRS (E.D.Va. July 2, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.