Case Name: INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER CREDIT CORPORATION et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Edward R. BELDING, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1972-06-21
Citations: 462 F.2d 624
Docket Number: No. 72-1021
Parties: INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER CREDIT CORPORATION et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Edward R. BELDING, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 462
Pages: 624–625

Head Matter:
INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER CREDIT CORPORATION et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Edward R. BELDING, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 72-1021
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
June 21, 1972.
Danny Cupti, Dixon L. Pyles, Pyles & Tucker, Jackson, Miss., for defendant-appellant.
L. N. D. Wells, Jr., Dallas, Tex., Fountain D. Dawson, Mullinax, Wells, Mauzy & Baab, Inc., by Beverly N. Ballantine, Greenville, Miss., Thomas F. Phalen, Jr., W. C. Smith, Jr., Jackson, Miss., for Teamsters Local Union No. 891.
Lawrence J. Frank, Jackson, Miss., R. Ian Hunter, Detroit, Mich., Sorrell Logothetis, Jackson, Miss., Knee, Snyder & Parks, Dayton, Ohio, for Teamsters Local Union No. 654.
Before BELL, DYER and CLARK, Circuit Judges.
[1] Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The entry of judgment in the within matter adjudicated fewer than all of the claims, and the liabilities of fewer than all of the parties in and to the litigation. There has been no entry of final judgment by the district court upon an express determination that there is no just reason for delay as is required by Rule 54(b), F.R.Civ.Procedure. Hence, the judgment lacks the requisite finality to be appealable within the meaning of 28 U.S.C.A. § 1291. Bailey v. Rowan Drilling Company, 5 Cir., 1971, 441 F.2d 57; Cook v. Eizenman, 5 Cir., 1963, 312 F.2d 134.
Dismissed.