Case Name: New York State Housing Finance Agency, Respondent, v. Local 2110, United Auto Workers, AFL-CIO, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1997-05-06
Citations: 239 A.D.2d 157
Docket Number: 
Parties: New York State Housing Finance Agency, Respondent, v Local 2110, United Auto Workers, AFL-CIO, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 239
Pages: 157–157

Head Matter:
New York State Housing Finance Agency, Respondent, v Local 2110, United Auto Workers, AFL-CIO, Appellant.
[657 NYS2d 623]

Opinion:
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered July 11, 1996, which granted petitioner's application and permanently stayed arbitration, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Since petitioner's position is that only an individually aggrieved employee may initiate a grievance procedure, a condition precedent to entry into the arbitration process is at issue, and it is an issue for the court to resolve (see, Matter of Cassone, 63 NY2d 756, 759; Matter of Lassiter v CNA Ins. Co., 195 AD2d 362, 363). The court correctly determined that the collective bargaining agreement, construed as a whole (see, County of Westchester v Mahoney, 56 NY2d 756), does not reflect that appellant union has any right to initiate a grievance procedure in its own name. The record establishes that petitioner did not impede satisfaction of the condition precedent (see, Young v Whitney, 111 AD2d 1013, 1014). We have considered appellant's remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger and Wallach, JJ.