Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael James MONTGOMERY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-06-01
Citations: 428 F. App'x 899
Docket Number: No. 10-14607
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael James MONTGOMERY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before HULL, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 428
Pages: 899–899

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael James MONTGOMERY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-14607
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
June 1, 2011.
Peggy Morris Ronca, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Daniel W. Eckhart, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Rick L. Jancha, Nejame, Lafay, Jancha, et ah, Orlando, FL, Robert E. O’Neill, David Paul Rhodes, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Tracy N. DaCruz, Rosemary T. Cakmis, Donna Lee Elm, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Orlando, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before HULL, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Tracy N. DaCruz, appointed counsel for Michael James Montgomery in this 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) proceeding, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's order denying Montgomery a sentence reduction under § 3582(c)(2) is AFFIRMED.