Case Name: Ethel Yeomans Sherman, complainant-respondent v. Alton L. Sherman et al., defendants; Alton L. Sherman, defendant-appellant
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1937-04-30
Citations: 121 N.J. Eq. 614
Docket Number: 
Parties: Ethel Yeomans Sherman, complainant-respondent v. Alton L. Sherman et al., defendants; Alton L. Sherman, defendant-appellant.
Judges: For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Cole, JJ. 15.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 121
Pages: 614–614

Head Matter:
Ethel Yeomans Sherman, complainant-respondent v. Alton L. Sherman et al., defendants; Alton L. Sherman, defendant-appellant.
[Submitted February term, 1937.
Decided April 30th, 1937.]
Mr. Lionel P. Xristeller, for the defendant-appellant.
Messrs. Goult, Satz <& Tomlinson (Mr. Joseph Ooult), for the complainant-respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
•The pleadings and proofs have been carefully examined. It is apparent therefrom that the order appealed from vacating the preliminary restraint was a proper exercise of a sound judicial discretion.
The order is affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Cole, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.