Case Name: FRED SELBY, Appellant, v. SHERIFF, CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada
Jurisdiction: Nevada
Decision Date: 1975-02-26
Citations: 91 Nev. 117
Docket Number: No. 8090
Parties: FRED SELBY, Appellant, v. SHERIFF, CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Nevada Reports
Volume: 91
Pages: 117–118

Head Matter:
FRED SELBY, Appellant, v. SHERIFF, CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA, Respondent.
No. 8090
February 26, 1975
531 P.2d 1356
Morgan D. Harris, Public Defender, and Kelly H. Swanson, Deputy, Clark County, for Appellant.
Robert List, Attorney General, Carson City; George E. Holt, District Attorney, and Daniel M. Seaton, Chief Deputy, Clark County, for Respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION
Per Curiam:
In this appeal from an order denying a pretrial petition for habeas corpus, we believe the evidence adduced at the preliminary examination justified the magistrate's determination that there was probable cause to hold appellant for trial. NRS 171.206. See concurring opinion by Zenoff, J., in Franklin v. State, 89 Nev. 382, 389, 513 P.2d 1252, 1257 (1973).
"[W]e are not now doncerned with the prospect that the evidence presently in the record may, by itself, be insufficient to sustain a conviction." McDonald v. Sheriff, 89 Nev. 326, 327, 512 P.2d 774, 775 (1973).
The order denying habeas relief is affirmed.