Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald T. MASKO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-01-21
Citations: 362 F. App'x 373
Docket Number: No. 09-7396
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Ronald T. MASKO, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 362
Pages: 373–373

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Ronald T. MASKO, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 09-7396.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 14, 2010.
Decided: Jan. 21, 2010.
Ronald T. Masko, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Hugh McWilliams, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ronald T. Masko appeals the district court's order granting his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Masko, No. 5:99-cr-00013-FPS-JES-2 (ND.W.Va. July 17, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.