Case Name: HENDRICK vs. HENDRICK
Court: Tennessee Superior Court of Law and Equity
Jurisdiction: Tennessee
Decision Date: 1808-05
Citations: 1 Overt. 265
Docket Number: 
Parties: HENDRICK vs. HENDRICK.
Judges: 
Reporter: Tennessee Reports
Volume: 1
Pages: 265–266

Head Matter:
HENDRICK vs. HENDRICK.
Covenant upon a bond for the delivery of 200 bushels of corn at a particular place. Plea, non est fac tum. The defendant had confessed he owed the plaintiff a quantity of corn, and the witness said he believed it was 200 bushels, but did not state how he owed it, whether by bond or otherwise.

Opinion:
By the Court.
The issue here is, whether the defendant executed the bond or not ; the evidence offered is entirely persuasive, and not relevant. If the defendant had said he owed the plaintiff 200 bushels of corn by bond, the evidence would be admissible. .
1 Esp. R. 293