Case Name: Norman Lindsey MAYES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John ROWLEY, Warden; Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-11-17
Citations: 453 F. App'x 358
Docket Number: No. 11-6840
Parties: Norman Lindsey MAYES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John ROWLEY, Warden; Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 453
Pages: 358–359

Head Matter:
Norman Lindsey MAYES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John ROWLEY, Warden; Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 11-6840.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 15, 2011.
Decided: Nov. 17, 2011.
Norman Lindsey Mayes, Appellant Pro Se. Nichole Cherie Gatewood, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Norman Lindsey Mayes appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We agree with the district court that Mayes was afforded sufficient due process. Mayes v. Rowley, No. 1:10-cv-01308-CCB, 2011 WL 1808796 (D. Md. May 12, 2011); (June 1, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.