Case Name: Chilewich Sons & Co. v. United States
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1959-01-20
Citations: 42 Cust. Ct. 263
Docket Number: No. 62688; petition 7236-R (New York)
Parties: Chilewich Sons & Co. v. United States,
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Volume: 42
Pages: 263–264

Head Matter:
No. 62688.
Chilewich Sons & Co. v. United States,
petition 7236-R (New York).

Opinion:
Rao, Judge:
This is a petition for the remission of additional duties assessed pursuant to the provisions of section 489 of the Tariff Act of 1930, prior to its amendment by the Customs Simplification Act of 1953, by reason of undervaluation, upon entry, of an importation of sole leather.
It appears from the record in this case that the subject merchandise was invoiced at 30)4 cents per pound. Prior to entry, the customs broker consulted the office of the appraiser with respect to the value of this importation and submitted a copy of the invoice. The broker was instructed to make entry at 48 cents a pound and, accordingly, followed that advice in so doing. However, certain charges listed on the invoice were deducted as nondutiable for the reason that such charges had always been deducted, and the appraiser's office had always accepted such action.
A member of the brokerage firm, who testified on behalf of petitioner, stated that there was no intention to conceal any facts from the appraiser, or to defraud the revenue of the United States, or to pay anything less than the full amount of duties properly due and owing.
At the conclusion of the trial, counsel for the Government made the following statement:
Your Honors, we received a Customs agent report which reads as follows: "The appraised value exceeded the entered value by more than one per cent because the non-dutiable charges were not deducted by the appraiser through inadvertence."
It is thus evident that the undervaluation in this case was the technical result of the appraiser's inadvertenoe.
Based upon this record, we are satisfied that the entry of the merchandise at bar at a less value than that returned upon final appraisement was without any intention to defraud the revenue of the United States, or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case, or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of said merchandise. This petition for remission is, therefore, granted.
Judgment will be entered accordingly.