Case Name: Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co. v. Feingold et al.
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1926-06-15
Citations: 35 Ga. App. 496
Docket Number: 17314
Parties: Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co. v. Feingold et al.
Judges: Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 35
Pages: 496–497

Head Matter:
17314.
Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co. v. Feingold et al.
Decided June 15, 1926.
Rehearing denied July 14, 1926.

Opinion:
Bboyi.es, C. J.
1. The charge of the court in this case was fair and sufficiently full, and the refusal to charge as requested was not error.
2. The excerpt from the charge complained of, when considered in connection with the entire charge, was not error.
3. This court can not hold, as a matter of law, that there was no evidence authorizing the verdict; and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.
Judgment affirmed.
Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.
James Tift Mann, B. S. Roddenbery Jr., for plaintiff in error.
Milner & FarJcas, contra.