Case Name: Katie CLIFFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DTG OPERATIONS, INC., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-10-09
Citations: 485 F. App'x 234
Docket Number: No. 11-15663
Parties: Katie CLIFFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DTG OPERATIONS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before: RAWLINSON, BYBEE, and ARNOLD , Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 485
Pages: 234–235

Head Matter:
Katie CLIFFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DTG OPERATIONS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 11-15663.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Sept. 11, 2012.
Filed Oct. 9, 2012.
Richard Segerblom, Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Erin L. Malone, Esquire, Phelps Dunbar LLP, Tampa, FL, John E. Phillips, Phillips Goldstein, PC, Prescott, AZ, Mark J. Ricciardi, Esquire, Fisher & Phillips, LLP, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before: RAWLINSON, BYBEE, and ARNOLD , Circuit Judges.
The Honorable Morris S. Arnold, Senior Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Appellant Katie Clifford (Clifford) appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of her former employer, appellee DTG Operations, Inc., on her claim of employment discrimination. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm.
Because the record does not contain evidence demonstrating pretext, Clifford cannot establish a genuine issue of material fact regarding whether her termination was unlawful. See Hawn v. Exec. Jet Mgmt., Inc., 615 F.3d 1151, 1155 (9th Cir.2010); see also Vasquez v. Cnty. of Los Angeles, 349 F.3d 634, 641 (9th Cir.2004), as amended. The inferences Clifford urged us to make do not "have roots in the evidence...." Mueller v. Auker, No. 11-35351, 2012 WL 3892960 (9th Cir. Sept. 10, 2012).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.