Case Name: Fred RUCH, individually and as Personal Representative and Trustee of the Estate of Marjorie Ruch, Respondent, v. A.O. SMITH CORPORATION, Respondent, White Rodgers Division Emerson Electric Company, Defendant, Farmers Co-op of Hanska, Respondent; and EMERSON ELECTRIC COMPANY, third party plaintiff, Petitioner, v. MID AMERICA PIPELINE COMPANY, third party defendant, Farmland Industries, Inc., third party defendant, Fred Frederickson, d.b.a. F & B Hardware, third party defendant, Respondents
Court: Minnesota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Minnesota
Decision Date: 1985-09-19
Citations: 373 N.W.2d 783
Docket Number: No. C4-85-1087
Parties: Fred RUCH, individually and as Personal Representative and Trustee of the Estate of Marjorie Ruch, Respondent, v. A.O. SMITH CORPORATION, Respondent, White Rodgers Division Emerson Electric Company, Defendant, Farmers Co-op of Hanska, Respondent, and EMERSON ELECTRIC COMPANY, third party plaintiff, Petitioner, v. MID AMERICA PIPELINE COMPANY, third party defendant, Farmland Industries, Inc., third party defendant, Fred Frederickson, d.b.a. F & B Hardware, third party defendant, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: North Western Reporter 2d
Volume: 373
Pages: 783–783

Head Matter:
Fred RUCH, individually and as Personal Representative and Trustee of the Estate of Marjorie Ruch, Respondent, v. A.O. SMITH CORPORATION, Respondent, White Rodgers Division Emerson Electric Company, Defendant, Farmers Co-op of Hanska, Respondent, and EMERSON ELECTRIC COMPANY, third party plaintiff, Petitioner, v. MID AMERICA PIPELINE COMPANY, third party defendant, Farmland Industries, Inc., third party defendant, Fred Frederickson, d.b.a. F & B Hardware, third party defendant, Respondents.
No. C4-85-1087.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
Sept. 19, 1985.

Opinion:
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Emerson Electric Company for further review be, and the same is, denied, proceedings herein,