Case Name: BRAMSON v. BOGRAND
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1923-04-30
Citations: 1 Ohio Law Abs. 411
Docket Number: No. 4514
Parties: BRAMSON v. BOGRAND
Judges: Vickery,, P. J., Sullivan and Levine, JJ.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 1
Pages: 411–411

Head Matter:
No. 427
BRAMSON v. BOGRAND
Ohio Court of Appeals, Cuyahoga County
No. 4514.
April 30, 1923
This opinion has no.t been published excepc in Abstract
APPEAL — (1) No real question being before Appeals Court, decree entered in same terms as in court below.
Vickery,, P. J., Sullivan and Levine, JJ.
Appeal affirmed
Attorneys — Mooney, Hahn, Loeser & Keough, for Bramson; W. B. Woods, for Bogrand.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Epitomized Opinion
The action in the lower court was based on an accounting of monies received by Bogrand while in possession of certain property and the transfer of that property to Bramson. The lower court awarded-the possession of the property to Bramson and ordered her to repay certain money to Bogrand. Held by the Court of Appeals in affirming decree of the lower court:
1. There seems to be no real question before this court and we think a decree ought to be rendered in favor of the defendant Bogrand in substantially the same terms as was entered in the court below.