Case Name: TED HAAS, individually; Ted Haas, as Trustee of the Ted Haas Florida Land Trust; Ted Haas, as Trustee for an Unknown Land Trust; Ted Haas, as Trustee for Five Star Development Trust; W. Bruce Hancock, individually; W. Bruce Hancock, as Trustee for Five Star Development Trust; W. Bruce Hancock, as Director for Pasco Landholding Co., Inc., a Florida corporation; and Prime Share Investments Corp., a Florida corporation, Appellants, v. ZEPHYR SPRINGS GOLF CLUB, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, by and through its general partner, International Golf Group, Inc., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-11-22
Citations: 684 So. 2d 231
Docket Number: No. 96-02216
Parties: TED HAAS, individually; Ted Haas, as Trustee of the Ted Haas Florida Land Trust; Ted Haas, as Trustee for an Unknown Land Trust; Ted Haas, as Trustee for Five Star Development Trust; W. Bruce Hancock, individually; W. Bruce Hancock, as Trustee for Five Star Development Trust; W. Bruce Hancock, as Director for Pasco Landholding Co., Inc., a Florida corporation; and Prime Share Investments Corp., a Florida corporation, Appellants, v. ZEPHYR SPRINGS GOLF CLUB, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, by and through its general partner, International Golf Group, Inc., Appellees.
Judges: SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and FULMER, J., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 684
Pages: 231–231

Head Matter:
TED HAAS, individually; Ted Haas, as Trustee of the Ted Haas Florida Land Trust; Ted Haas, as Trustee for an Unknown Land Trust; Ted Haas, as Trustee for Five Star Development Trust; W. Bruce Hancock, individually; W. Bruce Hancock, as Trustee for Five Star Development Trust; W. Bruce Hancock, as Director for Pasco Landholding Co., Inc., a Florida corporation; and Prime Share Investments Corp., a Florida corporation, Appellants, v. ZEPHYR SPRINGS GOLF CLUB, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, by and through its general partner, International Golf Group, Inc., Appellees.
No. 96-02216.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Nov. 22, 1996.
Rehearing Denied Dec. 16, 1996.
Douglas C. Spears and Elizabeth A. Baker of Adams & Spears, P.A., Orlando, for Appellants.
Charlie Luckie, Jr., of McGee, Luekie & Dayton, P.A., Brooksville, for Appellees.

Opinion:
BLUE, Judge.
The Appellants challenge a temporary injunction, arguing that the Appellees failed to show an irreparable injury or a threat to public safety. We agree and reverse. The trial court found insufficient evidence of an irreparable harm but entered the injunction based on a threat to public safety. After examining the record, we conclude that the evidence failed to demonstrate a public safety threat that would justify injunctive relief. Cf. Martin v. Pinellas County, 444 So.2d 489, 441 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983) (record "replete" with evidence that justified injunction based on public danger posed by pollutants on Martin's property that would contaminate the aquifer), review denied, 451 So.2d 849 (Fla. 1984). Accordingly, we reverse the injunction.
SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and FULMER, J., concur.