Case Name: Claudio LISMAN, an individual, Appellant, v. Jose Sanchez GUILLOID, an individual, and Maria de las Mercedes Santamaria de Sanchez, an individual, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2017-04-26
Citations: 217 So. 3d 234
Docket Number: No. 3D16-1169
Parties: Claudio LISMAN, an individual, Appellant, v. Jose Sanchez GUILLOID, an individual, and Maria de las Mercedes Santamaria de Sanchez, an individual, Appellees.
Judges: Before ROTHENBERG, FERNANDEZ, and LUCK, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 217
Pages: 234–235

Head Matter:
Claudio LISMAN, an individual, Appellant, v. Jose Sanchez GUILLOID, an individual, and Maria de las Mercedes Santamaria de Sanchez, an individual, Appellees.
No. 3D16-1169
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Opinion filed April 26, 2017
Genovese Joblove & Battista, and Armando Lacasa, Jesus M. Suarez, and Jessica Serell Erenbaum, for appellant.
Luis Fernandez, for appellees.
Before ROTHENBERG, FERNANDEZ, and LUCK, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The plaintiff below, Claudio Lisman, appeals from a final order granting the defendants' motion to dismiss his operative complaint with prejudice. Although we find no merit in the plaintiffs argument regarding the dismissal of the operative complaint, based on the defendants' proper confession of error, we reverse the portion of the order dismissing with prejudice the plaintiffs counts for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, conversion, and unjust enrichment, and remand for the entry of an order allowing the plaintiff to amend these counts.
Affirmed in part; reversed in part; and remanded with instructions.
. The plaintiff's operative complaint included five counts—breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, conversion, unjust enrichment, and fraud. The plaintiff, however, is not appealing the dismissal of the fraud count. Thus, this opinion relates solely to the four other counts.