Case Name: Victor Hugo VASQUEZ MARTINEZ, Maria Teresa Bernardino Perez; Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-03-02
Citations: 313 F. App'x 990
Docket Number: No. 05-76961
Parties: Victor Hugo VASQUEZ MARTINEZ, Maria Teresa Bernardino Perez; Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: BEEZER, FERNANDEZ and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 313
Pages: 990–991

Head Matter:
Victor Hugo VASQUEZ MARTINEZ, Maria Teresa Bernardino Perez; Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 05-76961.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 18, 2009.
Filed March 2, 2009.
Victor Hugo Vasquez Martinez, Los An-geles, CA, pro se.
Maria Teresa Bernardino Perez, Los Angeles, CA, pro se.
Robbin Kinmonth Blaya, Esquire, Trial, Anthony W. Noiwood, Senior Litigation Counsel, Terri Jane Scadron, Assistant Director, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, CAC-District Counsel, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
Before: BEEZER, FERNANDEZ and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Victor Hugo Vasquez Martinez and Maria Teresa Bernardino Perez, married natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' order dismissing their appeal' from an immigration judge's decision denying their applications for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review the agency's discretionary determination that Petitioners failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying-relative. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005).
Petitioners' contention that the agency violated due process in their case by not considering the equities and by misapplying the law to the facts is unsupported by the record and therefore does not amount to a colorable constitutional claim. Id.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.