Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Cecil W. RHODEN, Jr., Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-09-12
Citations: 201 S.W.3d 70
Docket Number: No. ED 86731
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Cecil W. RHODEN, Jr., Appellant.
Judges: Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 201
Pages: 70–70

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Cecil W. RHODEN, Jr., Appellant.
No. ED 86731.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Sept. 12, 2006.
Gary E. Brotherton, Legal Writes, LLC, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Daniel N. McPherson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Cecil Rhoden, Jr., appeals the judgment entered after a jury trial on his convictions for five counts of statutory sodomy in the first degree and two counts of statutory sodomy in the second degree. We find no plain error in the trial court's decision to sustain objections to admission of prior inconsistent statements where the foundation for such statements was inadequate. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).