Case Name: John G. Burgdorf et al. v. Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of South Windsor
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1988-02-10
Citations: 13 Conn. App. 814
Docket Number: 5535
Parties: John G. Burgdorf et al. v. Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of South Windsor
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Appellate Reports
Volume: 13
Pages: 752–801

Head Matter:
John G. Burgdorf et al. v. Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of South Windsor
(5535)
Borden, O’Connell and Stoughton, Js.
Argued January 6 —
decision released February 10, 1988
Ralph J. Alexander, town attorney, with whom, on the brief, was Richard M. Rittenband, former town attorney, for the appellant (defendant).
Ronald P. Sherlock, with whom, on the brief, was James W. Sherman, for the appellees (plaintiffs).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Subsequent to the oral argument in this appeal, the plaintiffs moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground of mootness. On the basis of the briefs of the parties on the motion, and on the hearing held thereon, we conclude that the appeal is moot.
The plaintiffs' motion to dismiss is granted; the appeal is dismissed.