Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Timothy PADEN, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-03-02
Citations: 312 F. App'x 830
Docket Number: No. 07-3871
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Timothy PADEN, Appellant.
Judges: Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 312
Pages: 830–830

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Timothy PADEN, Appellant.
No. 07-3871.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 5, 2009.
Filed: March 2, 2009.
David R. Mercer, Asst. Fed. Public Defender, Springfield, MO (Raymond C. Conrad, Jr., Fed. Public Defender, Kansas City, MO, on the brief), for appellant.
Earl W. Brown III, Asst. U.S. Atty., Springfield, MO, for appellee.
Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Federal inmate Timothy Paden appeals the district court's order committing him under 18 U.S.C. § 4245, which provides for the hospitalization of an imprisoned person suffering from a mental disease or defect, until he no longer needs treatment or his prison sentence expires, whichever occurs first. Following careful review, we conclude that the district court's section 4245 finding was supported by the unrefuted opinions of the mental health professionals at the United States Medical Center for Federal Prisoners in Springfield, Missouri, and defense counsel's separate examiner, and that the finding was not clearly erroneous, notwithstanding Paden's statement at his hearing that he was fine. See 18 U.S.C. § 4245(d) (determination of mental illness and treatment need, and burden of proof); United States v. Bean, 373 F.3d 877, 879 (8th Cir.2004) (standard of review); United States v. Eckerson, 299 F.3d 913, 914-15 (8th Cir.2002) (per curiam) '(upholding commitment order based on opinion of prison hospital staff, despite inmate's denial of mental illness).
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court and grant counsel's motion to withdraw on condition that counsel inform appellant about the procedures for filing petitions for rehearing and for cer-tiorari. We also deny appellant's motion for appointment of new counsel.
. The Honorable Richard E. Dorr, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable James C. England, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri.