Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clarence SPRATLEY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-02-13
Citations: 311 F. App'x 603
Docket Number: No. 08-8117
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Clarence SPRATLEY, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 311
Pages: 603–603

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Clarence SPRATLEY, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 08-8117.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 30, 2009.
Decided: Feb. 13, 2009.
Clarence Spratley, Appellant Pro Se. David Novak, Office of the United States Attorney, Elizabeth Wu, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Clarence Spratley appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Spratley, No. 3:95-cr-00008-RLW-1 (E.D.Va. Aug. 25, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.