Case Name: Sherman N. SMITH, Jr., attorney for the Circuit Judges of the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, as Amicus Curiae, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida et al., Respondents; STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Donald GARRETT and Michael Garrett, Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1975-07-30
Citations: 316 So. 2d 262
Docket Number: Nos. 47247, 47248
Parties: Sherman N. SMITH, Jr., attorney for the Circuit Judges of the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, as Amicus Curiae, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida et al., Respondents. STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Donald GARRETT and Michael Garrett, Respondents.
Judges: ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, OVERTON, ENGLAND and SUNDBERG, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 316
Pages: 262–262

Head Matter:
Sherman N. SMITH, Jr., attorney for the Circuit Judges of the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, as Amicus Curiae, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida et al., Respondents. STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Donald GARRETT and Michael Garrett, Respondents.
Nos. 47247, 47248.
Supreme Court of Florida.
July 30, 1975.
Sherman N. Smith, Jr. of Smith, Heath & Smith, Vero Beach, and Robert L. Shev-in, Atty. Gen., and Basil S. Diamond, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioners.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Basil S. Diamond, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Elton H. Schwarz, Public Defender, and Russell J. Ferraro, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, for respondents.
Jeanne Dawes Schwartz, Public Defender, and Alan R. Parlapiano, Asst. Public Defender, for the Eighth Judicial Circuit, amicus curiae.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
During the pendency of this litigation, this Court on July 11, 1975, adopted a general statewide rule relating to electronic court reporting which renders moot the certified question, sub judice. Accordingly, the decisions of the District Court of Appeal and of the trial court are vacated and the cause remanded to the District Court of Appeal with instructions to remand to the trial court with directions to reconsider the matter in light of the rule adopted by this Court, supra.
It is so ordered.
ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, OVERTON, ENGLAND and SUNDBERG, JJ., concur.