Case Name: BENJAMIN SODOWICH, RESPONDENT, v. HENRY HEIMERT, Jr., APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1932-05-16
Citations: 109 N.J.L. 265
Docket Number: 
Parties: BENJAMIN SODOWICH, RESPONDENT, v. HENRY HEIMERT, Jr., APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 109
Pages: 265–265

Head Matter:
BENJAMIN SODOWICH, RESPONDENT, v. HENRY HEIMERT, Jr., APPELLANT.
Submitted February 12, 1932 —
Decided May 16, 1932.
For the appellant, Richard Spitz.
For the respondent, William L. Greenbaum.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trenchaed, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Van Buseire, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.