Case Name: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. CLEVELAND TYPOGRAPHICAL UNION, LOCAL 53, affiliated with International Typographical Union, AFL-CIO, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1978-06-08
Citations: 575 F.2d 1196
Docket Number: No. 76-2700
Parties: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. CLEVELAND TYPOGRAPHICAL UNION, LOCAL 53, affiliated with International Typographical Union, AFL-CIO, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 575
Pages: 1196–1196

Head Matter:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. CLEVELAND TYPOGRAPHICAL UNION, LOCAL 53, affiliated with International Typographical Union, AFL-CIO, Respondent.
No. 76-2700.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
June 8, 1978.
Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Jay E. Shanklin, Richard L. Brooks, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., Bernard Levine, Director, Region 8, N. L. R. B., Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner.
Lawrence M. Oberdank, Mortimer Riemer, Cleveland, Ohio, Ronald Rosenberg, George B. Driesen, Van Arkel, Kaiser, Gressman, Rosenberg & Driesen, Washington, D. C., for respondent.
Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and WEICK and CELEBREZZE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
This case is before the court on the application of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order reported at 225 N.L.R.B. No. 194. Reference is made to the reported decision and order of the Board for a recitation of pertinent facts.
Upon consideration, it is concluded by the majority of the court that the decision of the Board is supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole and that the Board's order should be enforced. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that enforcement be and hereby is granted.
Judge Celebrezze dissents on the ground that in his opinion the decision of the Board is not supported by substantial evidence of the record considered as a whole.
No costs are taxed. Each party will bear its own costs in this court.