Case Name: INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS, LLC and InterDigital Technology Corporation, Appellants, v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, and Nokia Inc. and Nokia Corporation, Intervenors
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-01-10
Citations: 707 F.3d 1295
Docket Number: No. 2010-1093
Parties: INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS, LLC and InterDigital Technology Corporation, Appellants, v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, and Nokia Inc. and Nokia Corporation, Intervenors.
Judges: Before RADER, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, MAYER, LOURIE, BRYSON, DYK, PROST, O’MALLEY, REYNA, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 707
Pages: 1295–1318

Head Matter:
INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS, LLC and InterDigital Technology Corporation, Appellants, v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, and Nokia Inc. and Nokia Corporation, Intervenors.
No. 2010-1093.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Jan. 10, 2013.
Patrick J. Flinn, Alston & Bird LLP, of Atlanta, GA, filed a combined petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc for intervenors. With him on the petition were John Haynes, of Atlanta, GA, and Ross R. Barton, of Charlotte, NC. Of counsel on the petition was Paul D. Clement, Bancroft PLLC, of Washington, DC.
Donald R. Dunner, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, of Washington, DC, filed a response to the petition for appellants. With him on the response were Allen M. Sokal, Don O. Burley, Smith R. Brittingham IV, and Houtan Khalili Esfahani, of Washington, DC, and Christopher P. Isaac, of Reston, VA. Of counsel on the response were Seth P. Waxman and William G. McElwain, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, of Washington, DC, and Mark C. Fleming and Lauren B. Fletcher, of Boston, MA.
Megan M. Valentine, Attorney Advisor, Office of General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, of Washington, DC, filed a response to the petition for appellee. With her on the response were Dominic L. Bianchi, Acting General Counsel, and Andrea C. Casson, Assistant General Counsel for Litigation.
Daryl Joseffer, King & Spalding LLP, of Washington, DC, filed a response to the petition for amici curiae Hewlett-Packard Co., et al. With him on the response were Jeffrey Telep and Adam Conrad.
Before RADER, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, MAYER, LOURIE, BRYSON, DYK, PROST, O’MALLEY, REYNA, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges.
Judge Bryson assumed senior status on January 7, 2013. Circuit Judge Moore did not participate in the vote.
Judge Bryson assumed senior status on January 7, 2013.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
A combined petition for panel rehearing and for rehearing en banc was filed by Intervenors, and responses to the petition were invited by the court and filed by Appellants and Appellee. By leave of court, a response to the petition was filed by Hewlett-Packard Co., et al., as amici curiae. The petition for rehearing and responses were considered by the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition for rehearing en banc and responses were referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service.
Upon consideration thereof,
It Is Ordered That:
(1) The petition for panel rehearing is denied, and a panel opinion and dissent are attached herewith.
(2) The petition for rehearing en banc is denied.
(3) The mandate of the court shall issue on January 17, 2013.
Before NEWMAN, MAYER, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges.