Case Name: Andrew HIGGINS, et al., Petitioners, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-06-22
Citations: 656 So. 2d 483
Docket Number: No. 84426
Parties: Andrew HIGGINS, et al., Petitioners, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, KOGAN, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 656
Pages: 483–484

Head Matter:
Andrew HIGGINS, et al., Petitioners, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 84426.
Supreme Court of Florida.
June 22, 1995.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender and Deborah K. Brueckheimer, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for petitioners.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Michael J. Neimand, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Parker D. Thomson and Carol A. Lieko, Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen., Miami, for respondent.

Opinion:
SHAW, Justice.
Andrew Higgins and Ernie Bennett seek review of the district court decision reported as State v. Tremmel, 644 So.2d 102 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994), wherein the court certified a question concerning the constitutionality of Florida's anti-stalking statute, section 784.048, Florida Statutes (Supp.1992). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.
We recently upheld the constitutionality of this statute in Bouters v. State, 20 Fla.L.Weekly S186, — So.2d-[1995 WL 242403] (Fla. Apr. 27, 1995). Accordingly, we approve Tremmel.
It is so ordered.
GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, KOGAN, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.