Case Name: SILVRAY LIGHTING, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kurt VERSEN, Trading Under the Firm Name and Style of Kurt Versen Company and Kurt Versen Company, a Corporation
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1953-04-29
Citations: 203 F.2d 955
Docket Number: No. 10955
Parties: SILVRAY LIGHTING, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kurt VERSEN, Trading Under the Firm Name and Style of Kurt Versen Company and Kurt Versen Company, a Corporation.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 203
Pages: 955–955

Head Matter:
SILVRAY LIGHTING, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kurt VERSEN, Trading Under the Firm Name and Style of Kurt Versen Company and Kurt Versen Company, a Corporation.
No. 10955.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued April 21, 1953.
Decided April 29, 1953.
Floyd H. Crews, New York City (William S. Gluck, Darby & Darby, Russell G. Pelton, New York City, on the brief), for appellant.
Harry B. Rook, Newark, N. J. (Karl Huber, Newark, N. J., on the brief), for ap-pellees.
Before KALODNER, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed upon the opinion of Judge Smith, 1952, 106 F.Supp. 90. We need add nothing to what has been so well stated in his analysis of the evidence and the applicable law.