Case Name: A. F. PARKER, Appellant, v. ARROYO-COLORADO NAVIGATION DISTRICT OF CAMERON AND WILLACY COUNTIES, TEXAS, et al., Appellees
Court: Texas Courts of Civil Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1934-02-14
Citations: 69 S.W.2d 1116
Docket Number: No. 9252
Parties: A. F. PARKER, Appellant, v. ARROYO-COLORADO NAVIGATION DISTRICT OF CAMERON AND WILLACY COUNTIES, TEXAS, et al., Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 69
Pages: 1116–1116

Head Matter:
A. F. PARKER, Appellant, v. ARROYO-COLORADO NAVIGATION DISTRICT OF CAMERON AND WILLACY COUNTIES, TEXAS, et al., Appellees.
No. 9252.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.
Feb. 14, 1934.
Rehearing Denied March 7, 1934.
Seabury, George & Taylor, of Brownsville, for appellant.
Greenwood & Lewis, of Harlingen, Dan Moody, of Austin, Templeton, Brooks, Napier & Brown, of San Antonio, and H. L. Yates, of Brownsville, for appellees.

Opinion:
MURRAY, Justice.
This suit is a companion case to cause No. 9253, styled A. F. Parker, Appellant, v. State of Texas et al., Appellees, 68 S.W.(2d) 637, this day decided'by this Court.
In this case the Arroyo-Colorado navigation district of Cameron and Willacy counties was the plaintiff below, while in cause No. 9253, the state of Texas and Cameron county were the plaintiffs below.
All the propositions of'law presented ⅛ this appeal are also presented in cause No. 9253. We do not deem it necessary to discuss each one of those propositions as here presented, as same are fully discussed in our opinion in cause No. 9253. For the reasons given in that opinion, all of appellant's propositions will be overruled.
The judgment is affirmed.