Case Name: Patrick L. McDOWELL, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-10-30
Citations: 59 S.W.3d 542
Docket Number: No. ED 79028
Parties: Patrick L. McDOWELL, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., LAWENCE G. CRAHAN and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 59
Pages: 542–542

Head Matter:
Patrick L. McDOWELL, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 79028.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Oct. 30, 2001.
Douglas R. Hoff, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Adriane D. Crouse, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., LAWENCE G. CRAHAN and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Patrick McDowell, Movant, appeals the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing.
The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(2).