Case Name: F. M. CHRISTIE, Appellant, v. Raymond F. ADAMS, Clayton D. Elliott and Florida Power & Light Company, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1978-06-13
Citations: 360 So. 2d 33
Docket Number: No. 77-391
Parties: F. M. CHRISTIE, Appellant, v. Raymond F. ADAMS, Clayton D. Elliott and Florida Power & Light Company, Appellees.
Judges: Before HENDRY, HUBBART and KE-HOE, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 360
Pages: 33–34

Head Matter:
F. M. CHRISTIE, Appellant, v. Raymond F. ADAMS, Clayton D. Elliott and Florida Power & Light Company, Appellees.
No. 77-391.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
June 13, 1978.
Rehearing Denied July 14, 1978.
Milton M. Ferrell, Herbert A. Warren, Miami, for appellant.
Steel, Hector & Davis and Paul J. Bona-via, Miami, for appellees.
Before HENDRY, HUBBART and KE-HOE, JJ.

Opinion:
KEHOE, Judge.
Appellant, plaintiff below, appeals a final judgment entered pursuant to a directed verdict in favor of appellees, defendants below.
In our opinion the trial court acted correctly in entering a directed verdict at the close of appellant's case. We have carefully reviewed the record and find that, even by considering all of the evidence in the light most favorable to appellant, it fails to reflect that appellant demonstrated a prima facie case of malicious prosecution against appellees. Appellant adduced no sufficient evidence to show the absence of probable cause for the criminal charges which appellees caused to be brought against him. Duval Jewelry Co. v. Smith, 102 Fla. 717, 136 So. 878 (1931); Ward v. Allen, 152 Fla. 82, 11 So.2d 193 (1942); Applestein v. Preston, 335 So.2d 604 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Sponder v. Brickman, 214 So.2d 631 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968); and Wilson v. O'Neal, 118 So.2d 101 (Fla. 1st DCA 1960). Accordingly, the trial court acted correctly in entering a directed verdict in favor of appellees at the close of appellant's case.
Affirmed.