Case Name: Samuel L. BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Anthony HATHAWAY; Lillian Gilliam; Lt. Biggs; Ms. Walton, Defendants-Appellees, and A. Spruill; Gibbs; Sanderlin; C/O Brown, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-04-06
Citations: 421 F. App'x 296
Docket Number: No. 10-7720
Parties: Samuel L. BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Anthony HATHAWAY; Lillian Gilliam; Lt. Biggs; Ms. Walton, Defendants-Appellees, and A. Spruill; Gibbs; Sanderlin; C/O Brown, Defendants.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 421
Pages: 296–297

Head Matter:
Samuel L. BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Anthony HATHAWAY; Lillian Gilliam; Lt. Biggs; Ms. Walton, Defendants-Appellees, and A. Spruill; Gibbs; Sanderlin; C/O Brown, Defendants.
No. 10-7720.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 31, 2011.
Decided: April 6, 2011.
Samuel L. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Bulluck Ricci, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Ap-pellees.
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Samuel L. Brown appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown V. Hathaway, No. 5:09-et-03004-BO, 2010 WL 4809034 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 29, 2009); (Nov. 18, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.