Case Name: Ronald D. WASHINGTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I, Defendant-Appellee, and United States Postal Service, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-04-29
Citations: 519 F. App'x 205
Docket Number: No. 12-2524
Parties: Ronald D. WASHINGTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I, Defendant-Appellee, and United States Postal Service, Defendant.
Judges: Before AGEE and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 519
Pages: 205–205

Head Matter:
Ronald D. WASHINGTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I, Defendant-Appellee, and United States Postal Service, Defendant.
No. 12-2524.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 25, 2013.
Decided: April 29, 2013.
Ronald D. Washington, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Connor Crook, III, Boyle, Bain, Reback & Slayton, Charlottesville, Virginia; Christopher S. Griesmeyer, Grei-man Rome & Griesmeyer, LLC, Chicago, Illinois, for Appellee.
Before AGEE and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ronald D. Washington appeals the district court's order denying relief in his employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Washington v. Kroger Ltd. P'ship I, No. 3:11-cv-00074-NKM-JGW, 2012 WL 6025755 (W.D.Va. Dec. 4, 2012). Appel-lee's motions to strike Washington's addendum to his informal brief and for sanctions are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.