Case Name: Edeck against Ramuer
Court: New York Supreme Court of Judicature
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1807-11
Citations: 2 Johns. 424
Docket Number: 
Parties: Edeck against Ramuer.
Judges: 
Reporter: Johnson's Reports
Volume: 2
Pages: 423–424

Head Matter:
Edeck against Ramuer.
A note not stamped according to the directions of the act of congress, passed the 6th day of July, 1797, cannot be read in evidence in an action bro’t since the repeal of that act,unless- the holder has complied with the provision of the repealing act of the 6 th Jlpril, 1802, by paying-the duty of 10 dollars.
This was an action of assumpsit on a promissory note, dated the 10th day of February, 1802, for forty-four dollars, payable on the first day of June then next.
On the trial of the cause, the note produced and proved to the jury was for the same sum and date as mentioned in the declaration, but' was stamped with a stamp offour cents. The counsel for the defendant objected to the reading of the note in evidence, because the act of congress required notes of that description to be written upon paper, stamped with a stamp of ten cents. A verdict was taken for the plaintiff, subject to the opinion of the court thereupon, as to the admissibility of the note produced in evidence.
The question was submitted to the court without argument.

Opinion:
Spencer, J.
delivered the opinion of the court. By the act of congress of the 6th July, 1797, all notes above 20 dollars, and not exceeding 100 dollars, were charged with a duty of ten cents, unless payable within sixty days, and if written on paper unstamped, or stamped for a lower duty than ought to be paid, then such note could not be given in evidence, until the sum of 100 dollars was paid for the use of the United States, to the supervisor of the revenue, who was required to stamp thereon the proper stamp. By the act of congress of the 6th of April 1802, the act of the 6th July, 1797, and any other relating to stamped papers, &c. was repealed after the 30th June then next, with a proviso, that for the recovery and distribution of fines, &c. which shall have been incurred before and on the said day, the acts therein repealed should remain in force, with a further proviso to another section of the last act, that notes, &c. which have been charged with a duty, and which prior to the said 30th June have been written, &c. on paper not stamped, &e. may be presented to the collector of the customs within the State, who shall, on payment of the duty and 10 dollars, endorse his receipt for the same, and then it shall be as valid, Sec. as if marked and stamped as by law required. The court are of opinion, that unless the directions of the last statute have been complied with, the note cannot be given in evidence.
New trial granted.