Case Name: Aldo D'LA ROSA and Mirtha Marceira Mazza, Appellants, v. Barbaro RODRIGUEZ and Coronet Insurance Co., Appellees
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1984-12-18
Citations: 460 So. 2d 567
Docket Number: No. 84-618
Parties: Aldo D’LA ROSA and Mirtha Marceira Mazza, Appellants, v. Barbaro RODRIGUEZ and Coronet Insurance Co., Appellees.
Judges: Before HENDRY, HUBBART and NES-BITT, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 460
Pages: 567–567

Head Matter:
Aldo D’LA ROSA and Mirtha Marceira Mazza, Appellants, v. Barbaro RODRIGUEZ and Coronet Insurance Co., Appellees.
No. 84-618.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 18, 1984.
Stone, Sostchin & Gonzalez and Robert Rossano, Miami, for appellants.
Goodhart, Rosner & Green; Daniels & Hicks and Elizabeth K. Clarke, Miami, for appellees.
Before HENDRY, HUBBART and NES-BITT, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the record and briefs of counsel we are convinced that the trial court did not err in entering judgment pursuant to a jury verdict which appellants contend included inconsistent findings. We find no merit in this contention. The record demonstrates that the answers provided by the jury on the special interrogatory verdict are all that are necessary to properly determine liability and damages as between the parties. No reversible error having been demonstrated, the judgment appealed is affirmed.
Affirmed.