Case Name: Coburn T. NORFLEET, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-10-25
Citations: 48 F. App'x 907
Docket Number: No. 02-1686
Parties: Coburn T. NORFLEET, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 48
Pages: 907–907

Head Matter:
Coburn T. NORFLEET, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 02-1686.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 11, 2002.
Decided Oct. 25, 2002.
Coburn T. Norfleet, Appellant Pro Se. John A. Dudeck, Jr., Jonathan D. Carroll, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Appellee.
Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Coburn T. Norfleet appeals the district court's order dismissing his petition to quash six administrative summonses pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7609 (2000). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Norfleet v. United States, No. CA-02-57-BR (E.D.N.C. May 22, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.