Case Name: Adam MANUEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joseph E. ORTEGO, et ux., Defendants-Appellees
Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1972-04-19
Citations: 261 So. 2d 82
Docket Number: No. 3808
Parties: Adam MANUEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joseph E. ORTEGO, et ux., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before FRUGÉ, HOOD and CULPEP-PER, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 261
Pages: 82–82

Head Matter:
Adam MANUEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joseph E. ORTEGO, et ux., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 3808.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.
April 19, 1972.
Preston N. Aucoin, Ville Platte, for plaintiff-appellant.
Dubuisson & Dubuisson by Jimmy L. Dauzat, and Leon Haas, Jr., Opelousas, for defendants-appellees.
Before FRUGÉ, HOOD and CULPEP-PER, JJ.

Opinion:
HOOD, Judge.
This is a workmen's compensation suit instituted by Adam Manuel against Mr. and Mrs. Joseph E. Ortego. The trial court rendered judgment in favor of the defendants, and plaintiff has appealed.
The trial judge found that "plaintiff has failed to prove that he suffered an accident while working for Joseph E. Ortego," and he rendered judgment rejecting plaintiff's demands. We have examined the record and have concluded that there is no error in the findings of or in the judgment rendered by the trial court.
The judgment appealed from is affirmed. The costs of this appeal are assessed to plaintiff-appellant.
Affirmed.