Case Name: Dennis M. O'HARA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND; Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-11-21
Citations: 670 F. App'x 777
Docket Number: No. 16-1684
Parties: Dennis M. O’HARA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND; Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service, Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 670
Pages: 777–778

Head Matter:
Dennis M. O’HARA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND; Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 16-1684
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: November 17, 2016
Decided: November 21, 2016
Dennis M. O’Hara, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Joseph Salem, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Annapolis, Maryland; Bruce R. Ellisen, Jennifer Marie Rubin, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Dennis M. O'Hara appeals- the district court's orders dismissing his petition for writ of mandamus for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. O'Hara v. Comptroller of Md., No. 8:14—cv-04044-TDC, 2015 WL 6739154, 2016 WL 2760337 (D. Md. Nov. 3, 2015 & May 12, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED