Case Name: Charles Niemann, Respondent, v. William Spiwak, Appellant, and Others, Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1934-12
Citations: 243 A.D. 550
Docket Number: 
Parties: Charles Niemann, Respondent, v. William Spiwak, Appellant, and Others, Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 243
Pages: 550–550

Head Matter:
Charles Niemann, Respondent, v. William Spiwak, Appellant, and Others, Defendants.

Opinion:
Order denying motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that on its face it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The complaint stating two causes of action, namely, one for a debt alleged to be owing by defendant William Spiwak to the plaintiff, and a second cause of action alleging a fraudulent conveyance of real property by said Spiwak and his wife, by which it is alleged Spiwak made himself insolvent or with an " unreasonably small capital " with intent to defraud the plaintiff, is sufficient on the face thereof and the defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint was properly denied. Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., concurs in result.