Case Name: BLACK, CROW & EIDSNESS, INC., Petitioner, v. ASPHALT PAVING COMPANY OF FLORIDA, INC., Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1979-07-11
Citations: 372 So. 2d 1011
Docket Number: No. 78-2266
Parties: BLACK, CROW & EIDSNESS, INC., Petitioner, v. ASPHALT PAVING COMPANY OF FLORIDA, INC., Respondent.
Judges: DOWNEY, C. J., and ANSTEÁD and MOORE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 372
Pages: 1011–1011

Head Matter:
BLACK, CROW & EIDSNESS, INC., Petitioner, v. ASPHALT PAVING COMPANY OF FLORIDA, INC., Respondent.
No. 78-2266.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
July 11, 1979.
Stephen M. Bull of Lawrence, Bull, Palmer & Dick, Orlando, for petitioner.
Larry R. Leiby and Stewart J. Bellus of Kavanaugh & Leiby, Miami, and Trotter, Bondurant, Griffin, Miller & Hishon, Atlanta, Ga., for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This cause commenced upon the filing of a notice of appeal from an interlocutory order denying a motion for summary judgment. Pursuant to petitioner's motion to amend the notice of appeal the cause has been treated as a petition for writ of common law certiorari. As such, certiorari is denied. See Chalfonte Development Corp. v, Beaudoin, 370 So.2d 58 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979).
CERTIORARI DENIED.
DOWNEY, C. J., and ANSTEÁD and MOORE, JJ., concur.