Case Name: Douglas Allen ASHCROFT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of OREGON; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-10-06
Citations: 398 F. App'x 301
Docket Number: No. 09-35305
Parties: Douglas Allen ASHCROFT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of OREGON; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: WALLACE, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 398
Pages: 301–302

Head Matter:
Douglas Allen ASHCROFT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of OREGON; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 09-35305.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 22, 2010.
Filed Oct. 6, 2010.
Douglas Allen Ashcroft, Salem, OR, pro se.
Jeff Payne, Salem, OR, for DefendantAppellee.
Before: WALLACE, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
The district court properly dismissed Douglas Allen Ashcroft's claims as time-barred. See Or.Rev.Stat. § 12.110(1), 30.275(9) (two-year statute of limitations for personal injury claims); Jones v. Blanas, 393 F.3d 918, 927 (9th Cir.2004) ("For actions under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, courts apply the forum state's statute of limitations for personal injury actions[.]"); see also Wallace v. Kato, 549 U.S. 384, 388, 127 S.Ct. 1091, 166 L.Ed.2d 973 (2007) (statute begins to run' when the plaintiff has a complete and present cause of action).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.