Case Name: Laurie G. JUSTICE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-03-03
Citations: 658 So. 2d 1028
Docket Number: No. 94-501
Parties: Laurie G. JUSTICE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: THOMPSON, J., concurs.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 658
Pages: 1028–1036

Head Matter:
Laurie G. JUSTICE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 94-501.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
March 3, 1995.
Order Granting En Banc Rehearing and Certifying Question July 21, 1995.
Terrence E. Kehoe, Law Offices of Terrence E. Kehoe, Orlando, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Kellie A. Nielan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The defendant's claims of error resulting in her judgment of conviction and the length of her sentence are rejected as lacking merit. Because the state has conceded that the written judgment contains several conditions of probation not orally announced, however, in line with Cleveland v. State, 617 So.2d 1166 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993), we remand for resolution of the discrepancy between the record of the oral pronouncement and the written order. Finding that a discrepancy exists, however, does not mean that the judge cannot impose the unannounced conditions. It merely means that if the court intends to condition probation on the written conditions not previously orally announced, it should, at "resentencing," make this intention known to the defendant and give her an opportunity to reject probation.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part and REMANDED.
THOMPSON, J., concurs.
HARRIS, C.J., concurs and concurs specially with opinion.
GRIFFIN, J., dissents -with opinion.