Case Name: Patricia CARR, Appellant, v. JENKINS McCANN, INC., now known as Jenkins Builders, Inc., The Interplan Practice Ltd., Inc., General Mills Restaurant Group, Inc., now known as GMRI, Inc., doing business as The Olive Garden, and Tenth Street Storage, Inc., as General Partner of Powerline Associates, Ltd., formerly known as Powerline Associates, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1997-06-04
Citations: 694 So. 2d 156
Docket Number: Nos. 96-0454, 96-2609
Parties: Patricia CARR, Appellant, v. JENKINS McCANN, INC., now known as Jenkins Builders, Inc., The Interplan Practice Ltd., Inc., General Mills Restaurant Group, Inc., now known as GMRI, Inc., doing business as The Olive Garden, and Tenth Street Storage, Inc., as General Partner of Powerline Associates, Ltd., formerly known as Powerline Associates, Appellees.
Judges: GLICKSTEIN, PARIENTE and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 694
Pages: 156–157

Head Matter:
Patricia CARR, Appellant, v. JENKINS McCANN, INC., now known as Jenkins Builders, Inc., The Interplan Practice Ltd., Inc., General Mills Restaurant Group, Inc., now known as GMRI, Inc., doing business as The Olive Garden, and Tenth Street Storage, Inc., as General Partner of Powerline Associates, Ltd., formerly known as Powerline Associates, Appellees.
Nos. 96-0454, 96-2609.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
June 4, 1997.
Kenneth D. Cooper of Kenneth D. Cooper, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
David B. Pakula of Kubicki Draper, Miami, for Appellee Jenkins McCann, Inc., now known as Jenkins Builders, Inc..
Eric G. Belsky and Ronald L. Kammer of Hinshaw & Culbertson, Fort Lauderdale, for Appellee Interplan Practice, Ltd., Inc.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We sua sponte consolidate these two appeals and reverse the dismissals of the complaints with prejudice, after the trial court granted motions to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action.
When the allegations of the two complaints are viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, the applicable counts stated causes of action against the general contractor and architect under the rule of Slavin v. Kay, 108 So.2d 462 (Fla.1958), and Easterday v. Masiello, 518 So.2d 260 (Fla.1988). See U.S. Lodging of Jacksonville, Ltd. v. H.B. Daniel Constr. Co., Inc., 617 So.2d 448 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Kala Investments, Inc. v. Sklar, 538 So.2d 909 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
GLICKSTEIN, PARIENTE and GROSS, JJ., concur.