Case Name: David Roy GLIDEWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-12-03
Citations: 630 So. 2d 1152
Docket Number: No. 92-2700
Parties: David Roy GLIDEWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: W-. SHARP and PETERSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 630
Pages: 1152–1152

Head Matter:
David Roy GLIDEWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 92-2700.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Dec. 3, 1993.
Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied Jan. 1, 1994.
James M. Russ, Orlando, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Anthony J. Golden, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
GOSHORN, Judge.
David Glidewell appeals from the judgment withholding adjudication of guilt and the order imposing adult sanctions following a jury verdict finding Glidewell guilty of shooting at, within, or into a building. Because the trial court imposed adult sanctions without making written findings as required by section 39.059(7), Florida Statutes (1991), we must reverse. See Troutman v. State, 630 So.2d 528 (Fla.1993). Upon remand, the trial court may again sentence Glidewell as an adult as long as the trial court strictly adheres to the statutory criteria and timely reduces the findings to writing.
REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.
W-. SHARP and PETERSON, JJ., concur.