Case Name: William Scott DAVIS, II, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of N.C.; Community Psychological Resource; Hampton Roads Mental Health Associates; City of Hampton; Honnely DSS-CPS WCHS-CPS; Mike Easly, NC Governor; Beverly Pardic, NC Governor; Pat McCory, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-04-04
Citations: 684 F. App'x 274
Docket Number: No. 16-7706
Parties: William Scott DAVIS, II, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of N.C.; Community Psychological Resource; Hampton Roads Mental Health Associates; City of Hampton; Honnely DSS-CPS WCHS-CPS; Mike Easly, NC Governor; Beverly Pardic, NC Governor; Pat McCory, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 684
Pages: 274–275

Head Matter:
William Scott DAVIS, II, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of N.C.; Community Psychological Resource; Hampton Roads Mental Health Associates; City of Hampton; Honnely DSS-CPS WCHS-CPS; Mike Easly, NC Governor; Beverly Pardic, NC Governor; Pat McCory, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-7706
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 30, 2017
Decided: April 4, 2017
William Scott Davis, II, Appellant Pro Se.
Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
William Scott Davis, II, appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil rights action for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny Davis' motions to remand and to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. North Carolina, No. 2:16-cv-00549-MSD-DEM (E.D. Va. Oct. 4, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED