Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mario MELO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-10-06
Citations: 295 F. App'x 955
Docket Number: No. 08-10959
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mario MELO, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 295
Pages: 955–956

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mario MELO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-10959
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Oct. 6, 2008.
Neal Gary Rosensweig, Hollywood, FL, for Defendan1>-Appellant.
Anne R. Schultz, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Before BIRCH, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Neal Gary Rosensweig, counsel for Mario Meló, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because our independent review of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and Melo's sentence following re-sentencing is AFFIRMED. We DENY as moot Melo's motion to dismiss counsel on appeal, and we DENY Melo's motions to dismiss his appeal and/or hold his appeal in abeyance.