Case Name: MUSE v. JONES
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1921-10-07
Citations: 27 Ga. App. 489
Docket Number: 12553
Parties: MUSE v. JONES.
Judges: Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 27
Pages: 489–489

Head Matter:
12553.
MUSE v. JONES.
The sole question in the case being one of fact, upon which the evidence is in conflict, the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial is affirmed.
Decided October 7, 1921.
Complaint; from Carroll superior court — Judge Irwin. April 28, 1921.
Emmett Smith, for plaintiff in error. Boykin & Boykin, contra.

Opinion:
Hill, J.
This was a suit for commissions alleged to be due on the sale of an automobile. The suit was filed in a justice's court, where a verdict was rendered for the plaintiff, and an appeal was taken to the superior court, where a verdict was again rendered for the plaintiff. The evidence was conflicting and the sole question is a question of fact. There was sufficient evidence to authorize the verdict, and this verdict has the approval of the trial judge.
Judgment affirmed.
Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.