Case Name: DEANE, Respondent, v. SIRE, Appellant, et al.
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1905-06-22
Citations: 94 N.Y.S. 1143
Docket Number: 
Parties: DEANE, Respondent, v. SIRE, Appellant, et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 94
Pages: 1143–1143

Head Matter:
DEANE, Respondent, v. SIRE, Appellant, et al.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
June 22, 1905.)
Action by Sydney Deane against Leander S. Sire, impleaded, etc. From a judgment of the City Court in favor of plaintiff, defendants appeal.
Affirmed.
William L. Stone, Jr., for appellant.
Maxwell C. Katz, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
It does not appear that the verdict was against the weight of evidence. The arbitration clause did not constitute a condition precedent (Seward v. City of Rochester, 109 N. Y. 164, 16 N. E. 348), and there is no exception to a ruling that may have prejudiced the defendant. Hence the judgment and order will be affirmed. Judgment affirmed, with costs.