Case Name: Alfred Herbert CUNNINGHAM, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1984-04-10
Citations: 448 So. 2d 68
Docket Number: No. 83-1657
Parties: Alfred Herbert CUNNINGHAM, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 448
Pages: 68–68

Head Matter:
Alfred Herbert CUNNINGHAM, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 83-1657.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 10, 1984.
Alfred Herbert Cunningham, in pro per.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The trial court's written order revoking the defendant's probation does not conform to its oral pronouncement finding that the defendant had not violated conditions 6 and 9, and upon remand, these findings should be stricken from the written order. In all other respects, the order revoking probation is affirmed.
Affirmed as modified.