Case Name: HIRSH & SCHOFIELD, Inc., v. GUSMER
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1915-12-10
Citations: 156 N.Y.S. 1127
Docket Number: 
Parties: HIRSH & SCHOFIELD, Inc., v. GUSMER.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 156
Pages: 1127–1127

Head Matter:
HIRSH & SCHOFIELD, Inc., v. GUSMER.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
December 10, 1915.)
Appeal from Special Term, New York County. Action by Hirsh & Schofield, Incorporated, against Aage Gusmer. From an order denying a motion for the continuance of a temporary injunction pendente lite, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed. See, also, 155 N. Y. Supp. 1113.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Without determining whether or not the plaintiff would be entitled to an injunction by final judgment after a trial of the action, we think the court was justified in refusing to continue the temporary injunction. The order appealed from is therefore affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.