Case Name: PRANK P. VENABLE, APPELLANT, v. JOHN BLUM, APPELLEE
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1909-02-23
Citations: 77 N.J.L. 451
Docket Number: 
Parties: PRANK P. VENABLE, APPELLANT, v. JOHN BLUM, APPELLEE.
Judges: Before Justices GaRrisoN, Parker and Voorttees.
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 77
Pages: 451–451

Head Matter:
PRANK P. VENABLE, APPELLANT, v. JOHN BLUM, APPELLEE.
Submitted December 5, 1908
Decided February 23, 1909.
On appeal from the Second District Court of the city of Newark.
Before Justices GaRrisoN, Parker and Voorttees.
For the appellant, Frederick 17. Van Blarcom.
For the appellee, Biker & Biker.

Opinion:
Per CuRiam.
An examination of the record fails to disclose any finding of facts in the state of the case as agreed upon by the parties. The state of the case should contain the facts so found from the testimony and not the testimony. Van Vechten v. McGuire, 41 Vroom 657.
There is no record of judgment, but merely a statement that a judgment favorable to the defendant was entered. There is one specification involving controverted facts which fails to point out any ruling or determination by the court below in matter of law.
The appeal will therefore be dismissed.