Case Name: Milton WILLIAMS, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-04-18
Citations: 18 S.W.3d 117
Docket Number: No. ED 76374
Parties: Milton WILLIAMS, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before: MARY RHODES RUSSELL, C.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and CHARLES B. BLACKMAR, Sr.J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 18
Pages: 117–117

Head Matter:
Milton WILLIAMS, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 76374.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
April 18, 2000.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 24, 2000.
Application for Transfer Denied June 27, 2000.
Dave Hemingway, Asst. Sp. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Andrea L. Mazza, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before: MARY RHODES RUSSELL, C.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and CHARLES B. BLACKMAR, Sr.J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant appeals from a judgment, denying without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.
The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).