Case Name: CITY OF LOS ANGELES (a Municipal Corporation), Appellant, v. SADIE D. GRIFFITH ABBOTT et al., Defendants; BENEVOLENT REALTY HOLDING COMPANY (a Corporation), Respondent
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1933-02-03
Citations: 129 Cal. App. 789
Docket Number: Civ. No. 7540
Parties: CITY OF LOS ANGELES (a Municipal Corporation), Appellant, v. SADIE D. GRIFFITH ABBOTT et al., Defendants; BENEVOLENT REALTY HOLDING COMPANY (a Corporation), Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports
Volume: 129
Pages: 789–789

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 7540.
Second Appellate District, Division Two.
February 3, 1933.]
CITY OF LOS ANGELES (a Municipal Corporation), Appellant, v. SADIE D. GRIFFITH ABBOTT et al., Defendants; BENEVOLENT REALTY HOLDING COMPANY (a Corporation), Respondent.
Erwin P. Werner, City Attorney, Frederick von Schrader, Assistant City Attorney, and Arthur Loveland, Arthur W. Nordstrom and C. N. Perkins, Deputies City Attorney, for Appellant.
J. Wiseman MacDonald, Hill, Morgan & Bledsoe, Meserve, Mumper, Hughes & Robertson, Aubrey Devine, Hyams & Himrod and E. C. Pyle for Respondent.
Overton, Lyman & Plumb, as Amici Curiae on Behalf of Respondent.

Opinion:
CRAIG, J.
An action in eminent domain having been discontinued following proceedings in injunction to restrain condemnation of properties in the City of Los Angeles, a judgment of dismissal was entered, from which the plaintiff appealed.
Said judgment awarding attorney's fees is reversed. Upon the authority of City of Los Angeles v. Abbott, 217 Cal. 184 [17 Pac. (2d) 993], the judgment of dismissal must be affirmed.
Works, P. J., and Stephens, J., concurred.
A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on March 3, 1933.