Case Name: Mrs. H. MILLS v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1934-02-07
Citations: 68 S.W.2d 1114
Docket Number: No. 16384
Parties: Mrs. H. MILLS v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 68
Pages: 1114–1114

Head Matter:
Mrs. H. MILLS v. STATE.
No. 16384.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Feb. 7, 1934.
Rehearing Denied March 14, 1934.
Wm. H. Burnett, of Amarillo, for appellant.
Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
MORROW, Presiding Judge.
The unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.
The state's witnesses, J. C. Lindop and Red Ratican, who were named as purchasers in the indictment, gave specific testimony to the effect that they purchased a pint of whisky from the appellant on or about the 23d day of December, 1932, for which they paid her
The appellant did not testify, but introduced testimony tending to establish the defense of alibi.
No complaint of the procedure appears in the record by way of bills of exception or otherwise.
The judgment and sentence fail to take note of the Indeterminate Senténce Law, article 775, C. C. P., as amended by Acts 1931, c. 207 (Vernon's Ann. C. C. P. art. 775) under the terms of which the appellant should be condemned to suffer confinement in the peniten-tiax-y for a period of not less than one nor more than two years.
The judgment is reformed and affirmed.