Case Name: Marvin A. HARLAN; Carol G. Harlan, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, formerly known as The Bank of New York, as Trustee for the Certificate Holders CWALT, Inc., Alternative Loan Trust 2006-30T1, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-30T1, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-07-18
Citations: 667 F. App'x 582
Docket Number: No. 15-3268
Parties: Marvin A. HARLAN; Carol G. Harlan, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, formerly known as The Bank of New York, as Trustee for the Certificate Holders CWALT, Inc., Alternative Loan Trust 2006-30T1, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-30T1, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before COLLOTON, GRUENDER, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 667
Pages: 582–582

Head Matter:
Marvin A. HARLAN; Carol G. Harlan, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, formerly known as The Bank of New York, as Trustee for the Certificate Holders CWALT, Inc., Alternative Loan Trust 2006-30T1, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-30T1, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 15-3268
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: July 5, 2016
Filed: July 18, 2016
Marvin A. Harlan, Fayetteville, AR, Pro Se.
Carol G. Harlan, Fayetteville, AR, Pro Se.
Judy Simmons Henry, Wright & Lindsey, Little Rock, AR, Edmund Scott Sauer, Bradley & Arant, Nashville, TN, for Defendant-Appellee. ■
Before COLLOTON, GRUENDER, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this diversity action, Marvin and Carol Harlan sought declaratory relief from a home mortgage, and the Bank of New York Mellon (BONY) brought a counterclaim for judicial foreclosure. The Harlans appeal after .the district court granted BONY's motions for judgment on the pleadings and for summary judgment, and entered a final judgment and decree of foreclosure. After careful de novo review, we conclude that the Harlans' arguments on appeal do not warrant reversal. See Saterdalen v. Spencer, 725 F.3d 838, 840 (8th Cir. 2013) (grant of judgment on pleadings is reviewed de novo); Linn Farms and Timber Ltd. P'ship v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 661 F.3d 354, 357 (8th Cir. 2011) (grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Timothy L. Brooks, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.