Case Name: Charles Etta WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-06-26
Citations: 256 F.3d 260
Docket Number: No. 00-10361
Parties: Charles Etta WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before POLITZ, SMITH and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 256
Pages: 260–263

Head Matter:
Charles Etta WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 00-10361.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
June 26, 2001.
William Clayton Isbell (argued), Law Office of William C. Isbell, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Harold R. McKeever (argued), Patricia Merian Reed, Dallas Area Rapid Transit, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellee.

Opinion:
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
Before POLITZ, SMITH and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Treating the. petition for rehearing en banc as a petition for panel rehearing, the petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. The court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the court, and a majority of the judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor (see Fed. R.App. P. 35 and 5th Cir. R. 35), the petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.