Case Name: Miss Catherine RANDOLPH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. US ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Defendant-Appellee; Catherine Denise Randolph, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Loretta E. Lynch, U.S. Attorney General, Dept. of Justice, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-06-22
Citations: 606 F. App'x 724
Docket Number: Nos. 15-1358, 15-1411
Parties: Miss Catherine RANDOLPH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. US ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Defendant-Appellee. Catherine Denise Randolph, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Loretta E. Lynch, U.S. Attorney General, Dept. of Justice, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 606
Pages: 724–724

Head Matter:
Miss Catherine RANDOLPH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. US ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Defendant-Appellee. Catherine Denise Randolph, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Loretta E. Lynch, U.S. Attorney General, Dept. of Justice, Defendant-Appellee.
Nos. 15-1358, 15-1411.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 18, 2015.
Decided: June 22, 2015.
Catherine Denise Randolph, Appellant Pro Se.
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Catherine Denise Randolph appeals the district court's orders dismissing her complaints for failing to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2012). We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals as frivolous for the reasons stated by the district court. Randolph v. Attorney Gen., No. 1:15-cv-00916-ELH (D.Md. Apr. 2, 2015); Randolph v. Lynch, No. 1:15-cv-00982-ELH (D. Md. filed Apr. 9, 2015; entered Apr. 10, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.