Case Name: Alfreda Tait, Respondent, v. Samuel Sweetbaum, Appellant, and Josephine Vogt, Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1932-07
Citations: 236 A.D. 739
Docket Number: 
Parties: Alfreda Tait, Respondent, v. Samuel Sweetbaum, Appellant, and Josephine Vogt, Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 236
Pages: 739–740

Head Matter:
Alfreda Tait, Respondent, v. Samuel Sweetbaum, Appellant, and Josephine Vogt, Defendant.

Opinion:
Order denying motion of defendant Sweetbaum to dismiss amended complaint for insufficiency reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, on authority of Paul v. Fargo (84 App. Div. 9) and Sachs v. Weinstein (208 id. 360). Young, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., concurs on the ground that the plaintiff in this action was not a party to the divorce action. She came into the case voluntarily and, therefore, was not maliciously prosecuted.