Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Marco FRANKLIN, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-08-15
Citations: 204 S.W.3d 228
Docket Number: No. ED 86229
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Marco FRANKLIN, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY and KENNETH M. ROMINES, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 204
Pages: 228–229

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Marco FRANKLIN, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 86229.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Aug. 15, 2006.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 11, 2006.
Application for Transfer Denied Nov. 21, 2006.
Gwenda R. Robinson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Karen L. Kramer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY and KENNETH M. ROMINES, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The defendant, Marco Franklin, appeals the judgment entered upon his convictions by a jury for first-degree assault of a law enforcement officer, Section 565.081 RSMo 2000, armed criminal action, Section 571.015 RSMo 2000, and felony resisting arrest, Section 575.150 RSMo 2000. We have reviewed the parties' briefs and the record on appeal and find no error. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties, however, have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).