Case Name: Jesse BUSK; Laurie Castro, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. INTEGRITY STAFFING SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-07-07
Citations: 794 F.3d 1032
Docket Number: No. 11-16892
Parties: Jesse BUSK; Laurie Castro, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. INTEGRITY STAFFING SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before: SIDNEY R. THOMAS, Chief Judge and JEROME FARRIS and N. RANDY SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 794
Pages: 1032–1033

Head Matter:
Jesse BUSK; Laurie Castro, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. INTEGRITY STAFFING SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 11-16892.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
July 7, 2015.
Mark Russell Thierman, Joshua D. Buck, Thierman Law Firm, Reno, NV, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
Roger L. Grandgenett, II, Peter D. Navarro, Rick D. Roskelley, Esquire, Littler Mendelson, PC, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before: SIDNEY R. THOMAS, Chief Judge and JEROME FARRIS and N. RANDY SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
Pursuant to the Opinion of the Supreme Court in Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk, 574 U.S.-, 135 S.Ct. 513, 190 L.Ed.2d 410 (2014), the judgment of the district court dismissing Plaintiffs' claims that they were entitled to compensation for time spent passing through security screening at the end of the work day under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., as amended by the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947, § 251 et seq., and under parallel state law, is AFFIRMED. Costs are awarded to Defendant in the amount of $1,077.25.