Case Name: State of Ohio, appellee v. Maynard, appellant; State of Ohio, appellee v. Davis, appellant; State of Ohio, appellee v. Goldberg, appellant; State of Ohio, appellee v. Wohlstein, appellant
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1964-12-29
Citations: 29 Ohio L.R. 68
Docket Number: 38703; 38704; 38705; 38706
Parties: State of Ohio, appellee v. Maynard, appellant. State of Ohio, appellee v. Davis, appellant. State of Ohio, appellee v. Goldberg, appellant. State of Ohio, appellee v. Wohlstein, appellant.
Judges: Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, Griffith and Herbert, JJ., concur.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Reporter; a weekly journal published in the interest of the legal profession in the state of Ohio
Volume: 29
Pages: 68–68

Head Matter:
38703.
38704.
38705.
38706.
State of Ohio, appellee v. Maynard, appellant. State of Ohio, appellee v. Davis, appellant. State of Ohio, appellee v. Goldberg, appellant. State of Ohio, appellee v. Wohlstein, appellant.

Opinion:
Certified by the Court of Appeals for Franklin County.
O'Neill, Judge.
The arrest and prosecution of a person for violation of Section 3773.24, Revised Code (Sunday Closing Law), can be caused by two methods: (1) by filing an affidavit with a judge or clerk of a court of record or with a magistrate and (2) by filing an affidavit with the prosecuting attorney or attorney charged by law with the prosecution for the offense, who, in turn, shall file a complaint. (Section 2935.09, Revised Code.)
Judgments affirmed.
Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, Griffith and Herbert, JJ., concur.
Gibson, J., concurring in part.