Case Name: Ronald THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-10-12
Citations: 4 S.W.3d 592
Docket Number: No. ED 75354
Parties: Ronald THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, Jr., P.J., KENT E. KARHOL, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 4
Pages: 592–592

Head Matter:
Ronald THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 75354.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Oct. 12, 1999.
Jennifer S. Walsh, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, Jr., P.J., KENT E. KARHOL, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Ronald Thomas, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).