Case Name: OSAGE HOMESTEAD CORPORATION, a Missouri Corporation, d/b/a St. Charles Drilling Company, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW FLORENCE, Missouri, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1988-12-13
Citations: 761 S.W.2d 291
Docket Number: No. 54375
Parties: OSAGE HOMESTEAD CORPORATION, a Missouri Corporation, d/b/a St. Charles Drilling Company, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW FLORENCE, Missouri, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 761
Pages: 291–291

Head Matter:
OSAGE HOMESTEAD CORPORATION, a Missouri Corporation, d/b/a St. Charles Drilling Company, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW FLORENCE, Missouri, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 54375.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Dec. 13, 1988.
Wayne T. Schoeneberg, St. Charles, for defendant-appellant.
Frederick W. Drakesmith, St. Charles, for plaintiff-respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals from an adverse judgment in plaintiffs action for breach of contract. We affirm. The trial court's judgment is reviewable under Rule 73.01, is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears; and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).