Case Name: Eve Liberman, Appellant, v. Harry Liberman, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1933-07
Citations: 240 A.D. 768
Docket Number: 
Parties: Eve Liberman, Appellant, v. Harry Liberman, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 240
Pages: 768–769

Head Matter:
Eve Liberman, Appellant, v. Harry Liberman, Respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Plaintiff's proposed findings numbered 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7, found by the Special Term, are reversed as being inconsistent with the decision; defendant's proposed findings numbered 4, 5, 7 and 8, in so far as they were denied, are found; and this court makes the following new finding: " For nearly two years, and with full knowledge of the alleged fraud that she invokes, the plaintiff accepted benefits under the contract of marriage which she now seeks to annul." It is not necessary to decide whether or not failure of one spouse to accord " marital rights " to the other, where there is no impotence, may be the subject of an action for affirmative relief. (Mirizio v. Mirizio, 242 N. Y. 74, 80.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ.