Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Phillip Duane BREDY and Benedict Daniel Enoch, Jr., Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1972-03-29
Citations: 455 F.2d 1382
Docket Number: No. 71-3562
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Phillip Duane BREDY and Benedict Daniel Enoch, Jr., Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 455
Pages: 1382–1382

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Phillip Duane BREDY and Benedict Daniel Enoch, Jr., Defendants-Appellants.
No. 71-3562
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 29, 1972.
Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied May 3, 1972.
Vincent W. Perini, Dallas, Tex. (Court-appointed), for Phillip Duane Bredy.
Philip I. Palmer, Jr., Dallas, Tex. (Court-appointed), for Benedict Daniel Enoch.
Eldon B. Mahon, U. S. Atty., Charles D. Cabaniss, Asst. U. S. Atty., Fort Worth, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before BELL, DYER and CLARK, Circuit Judges.
Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed. See Local Rule 21.
. Bredy was found guilty of the robbery of the East Dallas Bank by the use of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 2113(a), (d) (2). Enoch was found guilty of aiding and abetting. We have considered the following errors asserted by one or the other or both of the defendants and find each of them to be without merit: (1) insufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction and the refusal to grant an instructed verdict of not guilty; (2) the giving of an Allen charge; (3) the Court's instruction on aiding and abetting; (4) the reading of instructions by the Court as requested by the jury; (5) the refusal of the Court to charge on lesser included offenses; and (6) the Court's instruction of the meaning of jeopardy.
. See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 430 F.2d 966 (5 Cir. 1970).