Case Name: George Reynold EVANS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. SHOAF, Detective; T.A. Weavil, Officer; Sergeant Fry; City of Wilmington, North Carolina, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-05-13
Citations: 96 F. App'x 889
Docket Number: No. 03-7375
Parties: George Reynold EVANS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. J. SHOAF, Detective; T.A. Weavil, Officer; Sergeant Fry; City of Wilmington, North Carolina, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 96
Pages: 889–890

Head Matter:
George Reynold EVANS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. J. SHOAF, Detective; T.A. Weavil, Officer; Sergeant Fry; City of Wilmington, North Carolina, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 03-7375.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 30, 2004.
Decided May 13, 2004.
George Reynold Evans, Appellant pro se.
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
George Reynold Evans appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Evans v. Shoaf, No. CA-03-8 (E.D.N.C. July 29, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED