Case Name: Irvine J. Kittinger, Respondent, v. Churchill Evangelistic Association, Inc., and Another, Appellants, Impleaded with Hiram W. Deyo and Another, Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1935-05
Citations: 244 A.D. 876
Docket Number: 
Parties: Irvine J. Kittinger, Respondent, v. Churchill Evangelistic Association, Inc., and Another, Appellants, Impleaded with Hiram W. Deyo and Another, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 244
Pages: 876–877

Head Matter:
Irvine J. Kittinger, Respondent, v. Churchill Evangelistic Association, Inc., and Another, Appellants, Impleaded with Hiram W. Deyo and Another, Respondents.

Opinion:
Judgment so far as appealed from affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: In affirming this judgment, we do not interpret it as constituting an adjudiea tion of the character of stock ownership by the plaintiff, the defendant Clinton H. Churchill, or the representatives of Sarah H. Churchill, in The Churchill Evangelistic Association, Inc. All concur. (The judgment decrees the proportionate ownership of shares on expiration of a voting trust agreement.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ. [151 Misc. 350.]