Case Name: James J. Leyden, complainant-respondent, v. Elijah W. Lawrence et ux., defendants-appellants
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1912-11-18
Citations: 80 N.J. Eq. 550
Docket Number: 
Parties: James J. Leyden, complainant-respondent, v. Elijah W. Lawrence et ux., defendants-appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 80
Pages: 550–550

Head Matter:
James J. Leyden, complainant-respondent, v. Elijah W. Lawrence et ux., defendants-appellants.
[Submitted July 8th, 1912.
Decided November 18th, 1912.]
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Learning, whose opinion is reported in 79 N. J. Bq. (9 Buck.) 113.
Messrs. French & Bicharás, for the complainant.
Mr. Austin H. Bivachhamer and Mr. John'Caiwalaáer, Jr. (of the Philadelphia bar), for the defendants.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in tire opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chiee-Justicb, Garrison, Swayze, Trenohard, Bergen, Voorhbes, Minturn, Kalisch, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Congdon, White, Treacy —14.
For reversal—None.