Case Name: Dana PARK, Claimant/Appellant, v. DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2007-10-30
Citations: 236 S.W.3d 665
Docket Number: No. ED 89452
Parties: Dana PARK, Claimant/Appellant, v. DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 236
Pages: 665–666

Head Matter:
Dana PARK, Claimant/Appellant, v. DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 89452.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Oct. 30, 2007.
Dana F. Park, Cape Girardeau, MO, pro se.
Ninion S. Riley, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent/Respondent.
Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Dana Park appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) denying her request to backdate her benefit year. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the Commission did not abuse its discretion. Reisdorph v. Division of Employment Sec., 8 S.W.3d 169, 171 (Mo.App. W.D.1999). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).