Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Nathaniel Cherry, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1969-06-16
Citations: 32 A.D.2d 812
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Nathaniel Cherry, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 32
Pages: 812–812

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Nathaniel Cherry, Appellant.

Opinion:
Judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 4, 1967, affirmed. Defendant's contention that his guilty plea was induced by the existence or threatened use of the fruits of an alleged illegal search and seizure is not properly before us. "Evidence dehors the record is not admissible in an appellate court for the purpose of reversing a judgment " (People v. Vignera, 29 A D 2d 657). Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.