Case Name: Myron W. MIZELL; Karen L. Mizell; Jerry D. Kennett; Leah B. Kennett; Zbigniew T. Lorenc; James Duane Nanson; Robert S. Hoffman; Charles D. Gregorius; Carolyn M. Gregorius; John T. Grandone; Gloria J. Grandone; Peter A. MacKercher, II; William N. Baskin; Lewis C. Vollmar, Jr.; Howard J. Aylward, Jr.; Dorothy E. Aylward; Curtis C. Blatz; Kathryn M. Blatz; David R. Nichols; Betty J. Nichols; William T. Tatum; Marilyn O. Tatum; and Robert M. Ross, Appellees, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1982-01-21
Citations: 669 F.2d 552
Docket Number: No. 80-2079
Parties: Myron W. MIZELL; Karen L. Mizell; Jerry D. Kennett; Leah B. Kennett; Zbig-niew T. Lorenc; James Duane Nanson; Robert S. Hoffman; Charles D. Gregori-us; Carolyn M. Gregorius; John T. Grandone; Gloria J. Grandone; Peter A. MacKercher, II; William N. Baskin; Lewis C. Vollmar, Jr.; Howard J. Ayl-ward, Jr.; Dorothy E. Aylward; Curtis C. Blatz; Kathryn M. Blatz; David R. Nichols; Betty J. Nichols; William T. Tatum; Marilyn O. Tatum; and Robert M. Ross, Appellees, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 669
Pages: 552–554

Head Matter:
Myron W. MIZELL; Karen L. Mizell; Jerry D. Kennett; Leah B. Kennett; Zbig-niew T. Lorenc; James Duane Nanson; Robert S. Hoffman; Charles D. Gregori-us; Carolyn M. Gregorius; John T. Grandone; Gloria J. Grandone; Peter A. MacKercher, II; William N. Baskin; Lewis C. Vollmar, Jr.; Howard J. Ayl-ward, Jr.; Dorothy E. Aylward; Curtis C. Blatz; Kathryn M. Blatz; David R. Nichols; Betty J. Nichols; William T. Tatum; Marilyn O. Tatum; and Robert M. Ross, Appellees, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellant.
No. 80-2079.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Jan. 21, 1982.

Opinion:
On Petition for Rehearing En Banc.
The Court, having considered appellant's petition for rehearing 663 F.2d 772 and suggestions for rehearing en banc and being now fully advised in the premises, hereby orders the petition for rehearing and suggestions for rehearing en banc denied by an equally divided Court.