Case Name: MOUNTAIN HILL PROPERTIES INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE OF THE TOWNSHIP OF MIDDLETOWN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1972-09-26
Citations: 63 N.J. 571
Docket Number: 
Parties: MOUNTAIN HILL PROPERTIES INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE OF THE TOWNSHIP OF MIDDLETOWN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 63
Pages: 571–571

Head Matter:
MOUNTAIN HILL PROPERTIES INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE OF THE TOWNSHIP OF MIDDLETOWN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Argued September 26, 1972
Decided September 26, 1972.
Mr. James R. Minogue argued the cause for appellants, Middletown Council of Civic Associations, et al. (Messrs. Minogue & Deakin, attorneys; Mr. James R. Minogue, of counsel.)
Mr. Peter P. Frunzi, Jr., argued the cause for defendant-appellant.
Mr. Daniel J. O’Hern argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Messrs. Abramoff, Apy & O’Hern, attorneys.)

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
A petition for certification having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same,
It is hereupon Ordered that the petition for certification is granted (62 N. J. 80), and the matter is remanded to the Appellate Division with directions to grant the application to intervene and to hear the merits of the appeal at a short date to be fixed by the Appellate Division.
Por reversal —• Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Proctor, Hall and Mountain and Judges Con-eord and Sullivan — 7.
Opposed — None.