Case Name: Norton JOSEPHSON, Appellant, v. Henry AUTRY, Anthony J. Grezik, J. Kermit Coble, Hayward B. Brown and E. W. Korb, as and constituting the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Daytona Beach, Florida; Carl Wetherell, as the duly qualified Building Inspector of the City of Daytona Beach, Florida; The City of Daytona Beach, Florida, a Municipality organized and existing under the laws of the State of Florida; and Ucal W. Cunningham and Minna L. Cunningham, his wife, Appellees
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1957-12-18
Citations: 99 So. 2d 230
Docket Number: 
Parties: Norton JOSEPHSON, Appellant, v. Henry AUTRY, Anthony J. Grezik, J. Kermit Coble, Hayward B. Brown and E. W. Korb, as and constituting the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Daytona Beach, Florida; Carl Wetherell, as the duly qualified Building Inspector of the City of Daytona Beach, Florida; The City of Daytona Beach, Florida, a Municipality organized and existing under the laws of the State of Florida; and Ucal W. Cunningham and Minna L. Cunningham, his wife, Appellees.
Judges: TERRELL, C. J., and THOMAS, HOB-SON, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 99
Pages: 230–231

Head Matter:
Norton JOSEPHSON, Appellant, v. Henry AUTRY, Anthony J. Grezik, J. Kermit Coble, Hayward B. Brown and E. W. Korb, as and constituting the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Daytona Beach, Florida; Carl Wetherell, as the duly qualified Building Inspector of the City of Daytona Beach, Florida; The City of Daytona Beach, Florida, a Municipality organized and existing under the laws of the State of Florida; and Ucal W. Cunningham and Minna L. Cunningham, his wife, Appellees.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Dec. 18, 1957.
Norton Josephson, Daytona Beach, in pro. per., for appellant.
Anthony J. Grezik, Daytona Beach, for Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Daytona Beach.
Raymond, Wilson & Karl, Daytona Beach, for Ucal W. Cunningham and Minna L. Cunningham.
C. A. Vincent, Jr., Daytona Beach, for Carl W. Wetherell, Building Inspector of the City of Daytona Beach, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This cause came on to be heard on the motion of attorneys for appellees to affirm the judgment appealed from by interlocutory appeal pursuant to the rules of this Court and it appearing to the Court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on interlocutory appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument ;
It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the inter locutory order appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the order is
Affirmed.
TERRELL, C. J., and THOMAS, HOB-SON, THORNAL and O'CONNELL, JJ., concur.