Case Name: WORTHINGTON, Respondent, v. DUTCH DECORATIVE ART CO., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1903-11-18
Citations: 84 N.Y.S. 1151
Docket Number: 
Parties: WORTHINGTON, Respondent, v. DUTCH DECORATIVE ART CO., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 84
Pages: 1151–1151

Head Matter:
WORTHINGTON, Respondent, v. DUTCH DECORATIVE ART CO., Appellant.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
November 18, 1903.)
Action by Paul B. Worthington against the Dutch Decorative Art Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Modified.
Stern, Singer & Barr, for appellant.
W. H. Dodd, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The evidence established the plaintiff's acquiescence in the reduction of his salary subsequent to January 10, 1903, and the judgment should be reduced by $60, representing 12 weeks' work at $5 per week; that sum being the difference between the original rate of $25 and the reduced rate of $20. The judgment should be modified by reducing it to $130.87, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs of this appeal. Judgment modified by reducing amount of recovery to the sum of $130.87, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party.