Case Name: Edmund W. Hathaway, Respondent, v. James P. Graham, Appellant, Impleaded with Charles D. Smith and Others, Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1911-06
Citations: 145 A.D. 937
Docket Number: 
Parties: Edmund W. Hathaway, Respondent, v. James P. Graham, Appellant, Impleaded with Charles D. Smith and Others, Respondents.
Judges: Jenks, P. J., Woodward and Rich, JJ., concurred.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 145
Pages: 937–937

Head Matter:
Edmund W. Hathaway, Respondent, v. James P. Graham, Appellant, Impleaded with Charles D. Smith and Others, Respondents.

Opinion:
We think that the obligation imposed upon the plaintiff and the defendant Titcomb^ should be enlarged so as to require them to respond to the partnership. The judgment should be modified in t as so modified affirmed, without costs.
Jenks, P. J., Woodward and Rich, JJ., concurred.