Case Name: Wade & Osborne, Appellants, vs. Goldsberry, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Missouri
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1852-10
Citations: 17 Mo. 270
Docket Number: 
Parties: Wade & Osborne, Appellants, vs. Goldsberry, Respondent.
Judges: with the concurrence of the other Judges.
Reporter: Missouri Reports
Volume: 17
Pages: 270–270

Head Matter:
Wade & Osborne, Appellants, vs. Goldsberry, Respondent.
Appeal from St. Louis Court of Common Pleas.
Todd & Krum, for appellants.
T. B. Hudson, for respondent.

Opinion:
Scott, Judge.
This case is in all material respects like the foregoing. Goldsberry, by adopting the acts of Emerson, constituted him his agent. In this suit, there is the note of a third person given in satisfaction of the demand on which the action is brought. As to the goodness of the bargain, we cannot speculate. If conjectures were allowable, a state of facts may be imagined, which would show the contract a very judicious one. Let the judgment be affirmed,
with the concurrence of the other Judges.