Case Name: In re Broom
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2009-10-06
Citations: 123 Ohio St. 3d 1413
Docket Number: 2009-1686
Parties: In re Broom.
Judges: 
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 123
Pages: 1413–1413

Head Matter:
2009-1686.
In re Broom.

Opinion:
In Habeas Corpus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration thereof,
It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that the writ is allowed. Allowing the writ means only that a return is ordered. See Reed v. Kinkela (1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 1427, 702 N.E.2d 903; Hernandez v. Kelly, 107 Ohio St.3d 1430, 2005-Ohio-6400, 838 N.E.2d 670.
It is further ordered that respondent shall file a return of writ within 21 days of service of the petition, and petitioner may file a response within ten days after the return is filed. Petitioner's physical presence before the court is not required.