Case Name: MIKE CHESKO v. THERESIA CHESKO
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1923-05-31
Citations: 1 Ohio Law Abs. 538
Docket Number: No. 732
Parties: MIKE CHESKO c. THERESIA CHESKO
Judges: Funk, Pardee and Washington, JJ.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 1
Pages: 538–538

Head Matter:
No. 564
MIKE CHESKO c. THERESIA CHESKO
Ohio Appeals, Ninth District, Summit County
No. 732.
Decided May 31, 1923
This opinion has not been published except in Abstract.
DIVORCE and ALIMONY — Court justified in giving preference to evidence of certain witnesses.
Funk, Pardee and Washington, JJ.
Error, Common Pleas,
Affirmed
Attorneys — May & May, for Mike Chesko; Carl W. Myers, for Theresia Chesko.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Epitomized Opinion
In this case the Common Pleas granted a divorce to defendant on the ground of extreme cruelty and gave her the custody of the child and alimony.
If the trial court believed the evidence of certain witnesses in preference to the evidence of other witnesses, its decree was justified.
From the opinion of the court, which is part of the bill of exceptions', it is evident that the court come to the conclusion that the testimony of some of the witnesses was not worthy of credence. The trial court had before it the witnesses and an opportunity to observe their demeanor upon the stand and judge of their credibility, and we cannot say from a reading of the Record that the court was not justified in ruling upon the testimony of certain witnesses in preference to that of other witnesses