Case Name: George O. MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joseph LEHMAN, et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-11-27
Citations: 228 F. App'x 645
Docket Number: No. 05-35738
Parties: George O. MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joseph LEHMAN, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: ALARCÓN, RYMER, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 228
Pages: 645–645

Head Matter:
George O. MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joseph LEHMAN, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 05-35738.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Nov. 15, 2006.
Filed Nov. 27, 2006.
Michael C. Kahrs, Esq., Kahrs Law Firm, P.S., Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Gregory J. Rosen, Esq., AGWA-Office of the Washington Attorney General, Amanda Migchelbrink, Esq., Attorney General’s Office, Criminal Justice Division, Olympia, WA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: ALARCÓN, RYMER, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
George Mitchell, a civil detainee pursuant to Washington's Sexually Violent Predator Act ("SVPA"), Washington Revised Code chapter 71.09, appeals from the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against various officials of the Washington State Department of Corrections because the district court concluded the action was barred by the statute of limitations. We affirm.
Mitchell argues that the district court erred in failing to hold that the applicable three-year statute of limitations on his claim was equitably tolled during his pretrial confinement under Washington's SVPA. Equitable tolling is not applicable to this case. Under Washington law, "[t]he predicates for equitable tolling are bad faith, deception, or false assurances by the defendant and the exercise of diligence by the plaintiff." Millay v. Cam, 135 Wash.2d 193, 955 P.2d 791, 797 (1998) (citing Finkelstein v. Sec. Props., Inc., 76 Wash.App. 733, 888 P.2d 161 (1995)). Mitchell has not demonstrated that the officials engaged in bad faith or deception or made false assurances, or that he diligently pursued his claim. Because he filed this action outside the three-year limitations period, his claim is time barred.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.