Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Michael MONTGOMERY, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-12-16
Citations: 122 S.W.3d 718
Docket Number: No. ED 83008
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Michael MONTGOMERY, Appellant.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 122
Pages: 718–718

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Michael MONTGOMERY, Appellant.
No. ED 83008.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Dec. 16, 2003.
Michael Montgomery, Booneville, pro se.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John Munson Morris, III, Stephanie Mor-rell, Asst. Attys. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Michael Montgomery appeals from the trial court's order of May 19, 2003, which we construe to be a denial of his motion to amend sentence. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not err in denying the appellant's motion. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 30.25(b).