Case Name: CASTRO v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1913-01-20
Citations: 154 S.W. 548
Docket Number: 
Parties: CASTRO v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 154
Pages: 548–548

Head Matter:
CASTRO v. STATE.
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Jan. 20, 1913.
Rehearing Denied March 19, 1913.)
Cbiminal Daw (§ 1090 ) — Appeal—Bills op Exception — Necessity.
Where the transcript contains no bills of exception, and there is no statement of facts accompanying the record, an order on the motion for new trial cannot be reviewed.
[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Daw, Cent. Dig. §§ 2653. 2789, 2803-2822, 2825-2827, 2927, 2928, 2948, 3204; Dec. Dig. § 1090. ]
Appeal from District Court, Galveston 'County; Clay S. Briggs, Judge.
Frank Castro was convicted of manslaughter, and appeals.
Affirmed.
See, also, 146 S. W. 553.
Marsene Johnson, of Galveston, for appellant. Miles Crowley and Henry O’Dell, both of Galveston, and C. E. Dane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
For other eases see same topic and section NUMBER in Dec. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key-No. Series & Rep’r Indexes

Opinion:
HARPER, J.
Appellant was prosecuted and convicted of manslaughter, and his punishment assessed at five years in the penitentiary.
There is no statement of facts accompanying the record. Neither does the transcript contain any bills of exception, and under such circumstances the motion for new trial presents no question that we can review.
Affirmed.