Case Name: Reverthus BURGESS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1972-12-07
Citations: 269 So. 2d 773
Docket Number: No. 71-847
Parties: Reverthus BURGESS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: OWEN and MAGER, JJ., and MORROW, RUSSELL O., Associate Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 269
Pages: 773–773

Head Matter:
Reverthus BURGESS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 71-847.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Dec. 7, 1972.
Charles W. Musgrove, Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Nelson E. Bailey, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have reviewed the briefs and record on appeal and heard oral argument. On the basis thereof, we are of the opinion that no reversible error has been made to clearly appear. The judgment appealed from is, therefore, affirmed, without prejudice to appellant's right to raise the issue of competency of counsel by motion to vacate under Rule 3.850, F.R.C.P., 33 F.S.A. Geiger v. State, Fla.App.1969, 228 So.2d 449.
Affirmed.
OWEN and MAGER, JJ., and MORROW, RUSSELL O., Associate Judge, concur.