Case Name: Kevin PITTMAN, Petitioner v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2016-05-23
Citations: 635 Pa. 418
Docket Number: No. 90 MAL 2016
Parties: Kevin PITTMAN, Petitioner v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 635
Pages: 418–418

Head Matter:
137 A.3d 572
Kevin PITTMAN, Petitioner v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
May 23, 2016.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 23rd day of May, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Did the Parole Board abuse its discretion by summarily denying petitioner credit against his maximum sentence for time that he spent at liberty on parole following his recom-mitment as a convicted parole violator?