Case Name: CAMPBELL v. EDDY
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1928
Citations: 6 Ohio Law Abs. 311
Docket Number: 
Parties: CAMPBELL v. EDDY.
Judges: (Cushing, J., concurs.)
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 6
Pages: 311–311

Head Matter:
CAMPBELL v. EDDY.
Ohio Appeals, 1st Dist., Hamilton Co.
Dawson E. Bradley and Jos. W. 0’Harra, Cincinnati, fob Campbell.
DeCamp, Sutphin & Brumleve, Cincinnati, for Eddy.

Opinion:
HAMILTON, PJ.
1. Where defendant's counsel assented to statement by plaintiff's counsel that minimum verdict would be a certain sum, court's statement'to jury that their verdict will necessarily be for plaintiff was not error.
2. In action for breach of employment contract, 'omission, in court's charge as to measure of damages, of question of minimization of damages by efforts of plaintiff to secure other employment, held not reversible error, where omission was not called to court's attention, and plaintiff fully testified as to her reasonable effort to secure employment and the failure.
(Cushing, J., concurs.)
For reference to full opinion, see Omnibux Index, last page, this issue.