Case Name: State of Nebraska, ex rel. First National Bank of O'Neill, v. Daniel J. Cronin, Treasurer of Holt County, Nebraska
Court: Nebraska Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Nebraska
Decision Date: 1904-11-16
Citations: 72 Neb. 642
Docket Number: No. 13,665
Parties: State of Nebraska, ex rel. First National Bank of O’Neill, v. Daniel J. Cronin, Treasurer of Holt County, Nebraska.
Judges: 
Reporter: Nebraska Reports
Volume: 72
Pages: 642–642

Head Matter:
State of Nebraska, ex rel. First National Bank of O’Neill, v. Daniel J. Cronin, Treasurer of Holt County, Nebraska.
Filed November 16, 1904.
No. 13,665.
Mandamus. The opinion in State, ■ ex rel. First National Bank of Atkinson, v. Gronin, ante, p. 636, is approved and followed. Peremptory writ of mandamus allowed.
Original application for a writ of mandamus to compel respondent to deposit in relator bank its pro rata share of the county funds.
Writ allowed.
R. R. Dickson, for relator.
Arthur F. Mullen and M. F. Harrington, contra.

Opinion:
Barnes, J.
The application herein for a peremptory writ of mandamus was filed in this court at the same time that State, ex rel. First National Bank of Atkinson, v. Cronin, ante, p. 636, was .commenced; and an alternative writ was issued, returnable May 3, 1904. The application was based on a like state of facts, and the return to the alternative writ was the same as in the case above mentioned. It appears that at the time the action was commenced the relator had on deposit only $12,031.82 of the county funds, Avhen its pro rata share of said funds was $17,595. Under the undisputed facts, and the rule announced in the opinion cited, the relator is entitled to the relief prayed for, and a peremptory writ of mandamus is therefore allowed.
Writ alloaved.