Case Name: PALMER CLOTHING CO. v. BRITT et al.
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1925-03-31
Citations: 110 Okla. 38
Docket Number: No. 15257
Parties: PALMER CLOTHING CO. v. BRITT et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 110
Pages: 38–39

Head Matter:
PALMER CLOTHING CO. v. BRITT et al.
No. 15257
Opinion Filed March 31, 1925.
Rehearing Denied May 5, 1925.
Commissioners’ Opinion, Division No. 5.
Error from District Court, Pittsburg County; Harve L. Melton, Judge.
Action by Palmer Clothing Company against W. C. Britt and A. E. Britt, doing business under the name and style of Britt- Sheffield Company. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
Affirmed.
A. C. Markley, for plaintiff in error.
George M. Porter and John L. Fuller, for defendants in error.

Opinion:
Opinion- by
THOMPSON, C.
This action was commenced in the district court of Pitts-burg county by the Palmer Clothing Company, plaintiff in error, against W. O. Britt and A. E. Britt, doing. business under the name and style of Britt-Sheffield Company, defendants in error, for $881 due upon two promissory notes and an unpaid check. Judgment for defendants in error, and plaintiff in error appeals.
It was admitted by counsel for both parties in oral argument and in their briefs that the issues made up by the pleadings and the decisive facts in this case are the same as in the case of Doyle Dry Goods Company v. W. O. Britt and A. E. Britt, No. 15256, just decided by this court, 110 Okla. 35, 235 Pac. 1077. except in the name of the plaintiff in error and the. amount involved. Upon said issues, facts and the legal propositions applicable, the decision in the instant ease must follow the decision in the case, supra, which opinion is adopted as the opinion in this case and-the syllabus of that case is also adopted and the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.
By the Court: It is so ordered.