Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joseph Horlback, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2011-10-18
Citations: 88 A.D.3d 542
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph Horlback, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 88
Pages: 542–543

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph Horlback, Appellant.
[931 NYS2d 218]

Opinion:
The resentencing proceeding imposing a term of postrelease supervision was neither barred by double jeopardy nor otherwise unlawful (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]), and we do not find that term to be excessive. We have no authority to revisit defendant's prison sentence on this appeal (see id. at 635). Concur — Saxe, J.E, Friedman, Moskowitz, Freedman and Richter, JJ.