Case Name: Jorge Valvis PAPASTRATI, Appellant, v. Kiriaki PAPASAKELARIOU, Appellee.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2018-04-25
Citations: 245 So. 3d 927
Docket Number: No. 3D16–2921
Parties: Jorge Valvis PAPASTRATI, Appellant,
v.
Kiriaki PAPASAKELARIOU, Appellee.
Judges: Before SUAREZ, FERNANDEZ and LUCK, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 245
Pages: 927–928

Head Matter:
Jorge Valvis PAPASTRATI, Appellant,
v.
Kiriaki PAPASAKELARIOU, Appellee.
No. 3D16-2921
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Opinion filed April 25, 2018
Kevin Coyle Colbert, for appellant.
Nancy A. Hass (Hollywood), for appellee.
Before SUAREZ, FERNANDEZ and LUCK, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm without further discussion and write only to point out the perilous journey undertaken by counsel when they ask the trial court to interpret an order of a foreign jurisdiction without providing the court a proper foundation for interpretation of that order. The trial court was asked to interpret the order of an Aruban appellate court without the benefit of the law of Aruba that rightfully would control that interpretation. Without knowing what is required by the law in Aruba in relation to the appellate court decision, we cannot properly review the trial court's interpretation.
Affirmed.