Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael D. JAMES, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-10-11
Citations: 250 F. App'x 939
Docket Number: No. 07-12486
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael D. JAMES, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 250
Pages: 939–939

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael D. JAMES, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-12486
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Oct. 11, 2007.
Kristen Gartman Rogers, Frederick W. Tiemann, Carlos Alfredo Williams, SAL-Federal Public Defender, Mobile, AL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Donna Barrow Dobbins, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Mobile, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Before BLACK, MARCUS and HILL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Kristen Gartman Rogers, appointed counsel for Michael D. James in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and James's revocation of supervised release and sentence are AFFIRMED.