Case Name: Angela Tsiamis, Respondent, v. Wen Chaun Liu, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1999-03-29
Citations: 259 A.D.2d 746
Docket Number: 
Parties: Angela Tsiamis, Respondent, v Wen Chaun Liu, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 259
Pages: 746–747

Head Matter:
Angela Tsiamis, Respondent, v Wen Chaun Liu, Appellant.
[685 NYS2d 643]

Opinion:
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Thomas, J.), dated February 26, 1998, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The affirmed reports of Dr. Kenneth Falvo and Dr. R. C. Krishna which the defendant submitted in support of his motion for summary judgment failed to establish the defendant's entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see, Maisonaves v Friedman, 255 AD2d 494; Bocci v Turkowitz, 255 AD2d 476; Pietrocola v Battibulli, 238 AD2d 864; Flanagan v Hoeg, 212 AD2d 756). Accordingly, summary judgment was properly denied. Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.