Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Leonel MAGANA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-01-14
Citations: 308 F. App'x 154
Docket Number: No. 08-50211
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Leonel MAGANA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 308
Pages: 154–154

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Leonel MAGANA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-50211.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 17, 2008.
Filed Jan. 14, 2009.
Stephen Frederick Miller, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of CA, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Gary P. Burcham, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: GOODWIN, TROTT, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Jose Leonel Magana appeals from the 27-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for importation of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 952 and 960. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Magana contends that the district court failed to consider certain evidence of his drug abuse problems in its analysis under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Reviewing for plain error, see United States v. Dallman, 533 F.3d 755, 761 (9th Cir.2008), we conclude that the district court did not procedurally err, see United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 991-93 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.