Case Name: William ALEXANDER, Appellant, v. James PURKETT and Phyllis Byland, Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-12-04
Citations: 62 S.W.3d 628
Docket Number: No. ED 79614
Parties: William ALEXANDER, Appellant, v. James PURKETT and Phyllis Byland, Respondents.
Judges: Before MARY R. RUSSELL, P.J., PAUL J. SIMON, J., and MARY K. HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 62
Pages: 628–629

Head Matter:
William ALEXANDER, Appellant, v. James PURKETT and Phyllis Byland, Respondents.
No. ED 79614.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Dec. 4, 2001.
William Alexander, Farmington, MO, pro se.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Stephen D. Hawke, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before MARY R. RUSSELL, P.J., PAUL J. SIMON, J., and MARY K. HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
William Aexander appeals the dismissal of his petition for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief against James Purk-ett, the superintendent, and Phyllis By-land, the records officer, at the Farming-ton Correctional Center, requesting that he be given all jail-time credit for which he was entitled. The trial court dismissed the suit finding that Defendant did not assert a claim upon which relief could be granted. We find no error and affirm.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. We have, however, furnished the parties with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).