Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher Paul HAWK, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-09-19
Citations: 75 F. App'x 685
Docket Number: No. 02-30019; D.C. No. CR-01-05218-RJB
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher Paul HAWK, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 75
Pages: 685–686

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher Paul HAWK, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-30019.
D.C. No. CR-01-05218-RJB.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Feb. 3, 2003.
Decided Sept. 19, 2003.
Bruce F. Miyake, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Miriam F. Schwartz, FPDWA-Federal Public Defender’s Office, Tacoma, WA, Carlton Frederick Gunn, FPDWA-Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before KLEINFELD, McKEOWN, Circuit Judges, and SHAPIRO, Senior Judge.
The Honoable Norma L. Shapiro, Senior U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Christopher Paul Hawk appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for second degree murder, because the sentencing judge upwardly departed from criminal history category IV to category V pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3. We remand for resentencing to include specific findings supporting the upward departure; United States v. Carrillo-Alvarez, 3 F.3d 316, 324 (9th Cir.1993). See also United States v. Singleton, 917 F.2d 411 (9th Cir.1990).
The decision of the district court is
REMANDED for resentencing.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.