Case Name: Michael HERRET, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-02-22
Citations: 21 S.W.3d 865
Docket Number: No. ED 75913
Parties: Michael HERRET, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., J. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 21
Pages: 865–865

Head Matter:
Michael HERRET, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 75913.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Feb. 22, 2000.
S. Paige Canfield, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Rebecca M. Rivers, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., J. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Michael Herret , appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court's judgment is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
. Movant is also referred to as Michael Her-ret-el in the briefs and some legal documents.