Case Name: James T. ADAMS and Nina Adams, Respondents, v. Ray SMITH d/b/a Ray Smith Construction, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-06-19
Citations: 48 S.W.3d 105
Docket Number: No. WD 58927
Parties: James T. ADAMS and Nina Adams, Respondents, v. Ray SMITH d/b/a Ray Smith Construction, Appellant.
Judges: Before THOMAS H. NEWTON, P.J., JOSEPH M. ELLIS and RONALD R. HOLLIGER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 48
Pages: 105–105

Head Matter:
James T. ADAMS and Nina Adams, Respondents, v. Ray SMITH d/b/a Ray Smith Construction, Appellant.
No. WD 58927.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
June 19, 2001.
Jerold L. Drake, Grant City, for appellant.
Respondents acting pro se.
Before THOMAS H. NEWTON, P.J., JOSEPH M. ELLIS and RONALD R. HOLLIGER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Ray Smith appeals from a judgment against him based on his status as an independent contractor in the construction of a house. While the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order, a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).