Case Name: O.C. WILLINGHAM v. STATE of Arkansas
Court: Arkansas Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Arkansas
Decision Date: 1996-10-28
Citations: 326 Ark. 468
Docket Number: CR 96-1222
Parties: O.C. WILLINGHAM v. STATE of Arkansas
Judges: 
Reporter: Arkansas Reports
Volume: 326
Pages: 468–468

Head Matter:
O.C. WILLINGHAM v. STATE of Arkansas
CR 96-1222
932 S.W.2d 751
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Opinion delivered October 28, 1996
Honey & Honey, P.A., by: Charles L. “Chuck” Honey, for appellant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Appellant O.C. Willingham, by his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk.
The motion admits that the record was not timely filed, but neither appellant nor his current attorney admit fault. As such, the motion for rule on the clerk does not state good cause for granting the motion as discussed in our per curiam, In re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979). If appellant's current attorney, Charles L. Honey, will concede by affidavit that it was his fault that the record was not filed, or if other good cause is shown, then the motion will be granted. The present motion for rule on the clerk is denied.