Case Name: M.G., a Juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2018-12-05
Citations: 259 So. 3d 309
Docket Number: No. 3D18-1531
Parties: M.G., a Juvenile, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before EMAS, FERNANDEZ and LOGUE, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 259
Pages: 309–309

Head Matter:
M.G., a Juvenile, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D18-1531
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Opinion filed December 5, 2018
M.G., a juvenile, in proper person.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before EMAS, FERNANDEZ and LOGUE, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See L.L. v. State, 189 So.3d 252 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) (holding officer's testimony identifying substance in juvenile's possession as marijuana was admissible lay opinion based on officer's experience, personal knowledge, sensory perceptions, and everyday reasoning.) See also Smith v. State, 776 So.2d 957 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (holding that where contraband is within the exclusive possession of the defendant, knowledge of its presence may be inferred); Campbell v. State, 247 So.3d 102 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018) (same).