Case Name: Katie Roberts WILSON, Appellant, v. Margaret Jane ROBINSON, Jane Doe Robinson, John Doe Robinson, Rosanna Agnew, Guardian, Margaret Jane Robinson, Jane Doe, and John Doe, Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1927-03-07
Citations: 17 F.2d 1023
Docket Number: No. 4742
Parties: Katie Roberts WILSON, Appellant, v. Margaret Jane ROBINSON, Jane Doe Robinson, John Doe Robinson, Rosanna Agnew, Guardian, Margaret Jane Robinson, Jane Doe, and John Doe, Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 17
Pages: 1023–1023

Head Matter:
Katie Roberts WILSON, Appellant, v. Margaret Jane ROBINSON, Jane Doe Robinson, John Doe Robinson, Rosanna Agnew, Guardian, Margaret Jane Robinson, Jane Doe, and John Doe, Appellees.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
March 7, 1927.)
No. 4742.
See, also, 16 F.(2d) 431.
F. C. Reagan and Edwin H. Flick, both of Seattle, Wash., for appellant.
Wesley Lloyd, of Tacoma, Wash., and George Dysart and C. D. Cunningham, both of Centralia, Wash., for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The petition will be denied.
A similar order will be entered in each of the companion cases of Wilson v. Robinson et al. (No. 4743) 16 F.(2d) 432, and Lauridsen v. Alexander (No. 4744) 16 F.(2d) 432.