Case Name: ESTATE of Rodolfo OGARRIO (Daguerre), Deceased, Frank Rashap, Ancillary Administrator, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1964-05-07
Citations: 337 F.2d 108
Docket Number: No. 18112
Parties: ESTATE of Rodolfo OGARRIO (Daguerre), Deceased, Frank Rashap, Ancillary Administrator, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 337
Pages: 108–109

Head Matter:
ESTATE of Rodolfo OGARRIO (Daguerre), Deceased, Frank Rashap, Ancillary Administrator, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
No. 18112.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued March 26, 1964.
Decided May 7, 1964.
Mr. Frank Rashap, Ancillary Administrator, petitioner pro se.
Mr. Norman H. Wolfe, Atty., Dept, of Justice, with whom Asst. Atty. Gen. Louis F. Oberdorfer, Mr. Lee A. Jackson and Miss Melva M. Graney, Attys., Dept, of Justice, were on the brief, for respondent.
Before Bazelon, Chief Judge, Pretty-man, Senior. Circuit Judge, and Washington, Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this petition for review of a decision of the United States Tax Court, 40 T.C. 242 (May 7, 1963), the principal controversy relates to certain moneys owed to decedent (a non-resident alien not engaged in business in the United States) by a stock brokerage firm in New York. The Tax Court held that these moneys were not excludable from his gross estate for Federal estate tax purposes as "bank deposits" under Section 2105(b), INTERNAL REVENUE CODE of 1954. It also held that other moneys and stocks due decedent from a sometime former employer in the United States but received by his estate after his death were includable in the decedent's gross estate, under Sections 2053(c) (1) (B) and 2106 of the Code, without diminution on account of Federal income tax withholdings made as required by law by the former employer.
For the reasons given by Judge Raum, speaking for the Tax Court, the decision of that court will be
Affirmed.