Case Name: Billy LITTLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-09-11
Citations: 659 So. 2d 1379
Docket Number: No. 95-543
Parties: Billy LITTLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: WOLF, WEBSTER and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 659
Pages: 1379–1380

Head Matter:
Billy LITTLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 95-543.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Sept. 11, 1995.
Appellant, pro se.
No appearance by state.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Although appellant's motion for postconviction relief was sworn to, the facts in support of the motion were set out in a separate memorandum of law which was not under oath. We find the motion to be facially insufficient to support the granting of any relief as all matters of record were alleged in the unsworn memorandum of law. Jones v. State, 637 So.2d 999 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Rackley v. State, — So.2d— [1995 WL 437266], 20 Fla.L. Weekly D1716 (Fla. 1st DCA Jul. 26, 1995). Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's ruling. This disposition is without prejudice to appellant's right to re submit the motion with a proper oath. Schofield v. State, 641 So.2d 172 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).
WOLF, WEBSTER and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
. The trial court denied the order on other grounds; however, it failed to attach parts of the record refuting appellant's allegation that his attorney misinformed him about his provisional gain time credit eligibility.