Case Name: Armistead et al. v. Associated General Contractors of California et al.; City of Los Angeles et al. v. Associated General Contractors of California et al.; Los Angeles County et al. v. Associated General Contractors of California et al.; Klutznick, Secretary of Commerce v. Associated General Contractors of California et al.; and National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Los Angeles Branch v. Associated General Contractors of California et al.
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1980-07-02
Citations: 448 U.S. 908
Docket Number: No. 78-1107; No. 78-1108; No. 78-1114; No. 78-1382; No. 78-1442
Parties: Armistead et al. v. Associated General Contractors of California et al.; City of Los Angeles et al. v. Associated General Contractors of California et al.; Los Angeles County et al. v. Associated General Contractors of California et al.; Klutznick, Secretary of Commerce v. Associated General Contractors of California et al.; and National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Los Angeles Branch v. Associated General Contractors of California et al.
Judges: Mr. Justice Stewart, Mr. Justice Rehnquist, and Mr. Justice Stevens would affirm the judgment.
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 448
Pages: 908–908

Head Matter:
July 2, 1980
No. 78-1107.
No. 78-1108.
No. 78-1114.
No. 78-1382.
No. 78-1442.
Armistead et al. v. Associated General Contractors of California et al.; City of Los Angeles et al. v. Associated General Contractors of California et al.; Los Angeles County et al. v. Associated General Contractors of California et al.; Klutznick, Secretary of Commerce v. Associated General Contractors of California et al.; and National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Los Angeles Branch v. Associated General Contractors of California et al.

Opinion:
Appeals from D. C. C. D. Cal. Judgment vacated and cases remanded for further consideration in light of Fullilove v. Klutznick, ante, p. 448.
Mr. Justice Stewart, Mr. Justice Rehnquist, and Mr. Justice Stevens would affirm the judgment.
Reported below: 459 F. Supp. 766.