Case Name: CITY OF MELBOURNE, Appellant, v. Joseph Albert PUMA, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-04-09
Citations: 616 So. 2d 190
Docket Number: No. 92-1038
Parties: CITY OF MELBOURNE, Appellant, v. Joseph Albert PUMA, Appellee.
Judges: DAUKSCH, PETERSON and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 616
Pages: 190–190

Head Matter:
CITY OF MELBOURNE, Appellant, v. Joseph Albert PUMA, Appellee.
No. 92-1038.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
April 9, 1993.
Paul R. Gougelman, III and Michael R. Riemenschneider of Reinman, Harrell, Graham, Mitchell & Wattwood, P.A., Melbourne, for appellant.
Ralph Geilich, Melbourne, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on the authority of Snyder v. Board of County Commissioners, 595 So.2d 65 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991), juris, accepted, 605 So.2d 1262 (Fla.1992). See also ABG Real Estate Development Company of Florida, Inc. v. St. Johns County, 608 So.2d 59 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).
AFFIRMED.
DAUKSCH, PETERSON and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.