Case Name: Grady Edward LLOYD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mr. ADAM, Mail Service Room, Perry Correctional Institution, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-02-14
Citations: 3 F. App'x 120
Docket Number: No. 00-7430
Parties: Grady Edward LLOYD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mr. ADAM, Mail Service Room, Perry Correctional Institution, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINS, DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 3
Pages: 120–121

Head Matter:
Grady Edward LLOYD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mr. ADAM, Mail Service Room, Perry Correctional Institution, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 00-7430.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 8, 2001.
Decided Feb. 14, 2001.
Grady Edward Lloyd, pro se. Charles Franklin Turner, Jr., Samuel Carl Weldon, Clarkson, Walsh, Rheney & Turner, Greenville, SC, for appellee.
Before WILKINS, DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Grady Edward Lloyd appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lloyd v. Adam, No. CA-99-3592-4-18BF (D.S.C. Sept. 13, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.