Case Name: Jordan SHELTON III, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2017-05-23
Citations: 518 S.W.3d 900
Docket Number: No. ED 104472
Parties: Jordan SHELTON III, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Colleen Dolan, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 518
Pages: 900–901

Head Matter:
Jordan SHELTON III, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent.
No. ED 104472
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Filed: May 23, 2017
Jedd C. Schneider, 1000 W. Nifong, Building 7, Ste. 100, Columbia, MO 65203, For Plaintiff'Appellant.
Mary H. Moore, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Defendant/Respondent.
Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Colleen Dolan, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Jordan Shelton III ("Movant") appeals the motion court's order and judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k); Zink v. State, 278 S.W.3d 170, 175 (Mo. banc 2009). No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).