Case Name: Maurice Keith ROLLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1982-07-07
Citations: 416 So. 2d 51
Docket Number: No. 81-2299
Parties: Maurice Keith ROLLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and HERSEY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 416
Pages: 51–52

Head Matter:
Maurice Keith ROLLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 81-2299.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
July 7, 1982.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Anthony Calvello, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Trela J. White, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
A police officer testified at appellant's trial that he placed appellant's photograph in a photographic display for viewing by the alleged victim only after receiving certain undisclosed information from an undisclosed source. The victim then selected appellant's photograph from the display. We believe the officer's testimony constituted improper hearsay. Postell v. State, 398 So.2d 851 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Molina v. State, 406 So.2d 57 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). However we do not find a sufficient objection by appellant to preserve this error for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm.
AFFIRMED.
DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and HERSEY, JJ., concur.