Case Name: Dennis STONEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. L. THOMPSON, Physician, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-08-26
Citations: 142 F. App'x 167
Docket Number: No. 05-6697
Parties: Dennis STONEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. L. THOMPSON, Physician, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 142
Pages: 167–167

Head Matter:
Dennis STONEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. L. THOMPSON, Physician, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 05-6697.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 18, 2005.
Decided: Aug. 26, 2005.
Dennis Stoneman, Appellant pro se, John David McChesney, Rawls & McNelis, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Dennis Stoneman appeals a district court order granting summary judgment to Dr. Levester Thompson and dismissing his complaint alleging deliberate indifference to his medical needs. We have reviewed the record and the district court's memorandum and order and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Stoneman v. Thompson, No. CA-03-716 (E.D.Va. Apr. 19, 2005). We also deny Thompson's motion for reversal and summary judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED