Case Name: Marshall STOWE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Joseph BROOKS, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-09-10
Citations: 18 F. App'x 160
Docket Number: No. 01-6278
Parties: Marshall STOWE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Joseph BROOKS, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 18
Pages: 160–161

Head Matter:
Marshall STOWE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Joseph BROOKS, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 01-6278.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 28, 2001.
Decided Sept. 10, 2001.
Marshall Stowe, pro se.
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Marshall Stowe appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Stowe v. Brooks, Nos. CR-96-46; CA-01-9 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 81, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.