Case Name: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Cochrane
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1994-12-07
Citations: 71 Ohio St. 3d 97
Docket Number: No. 94-1763
Parties: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Cochrane.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 71
Pages: 97–98

Head Matter:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Cochrane.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Cochrane (1994), 71 Ohio St.3d 97.]
(No. 94-1763
Submitted October 24, 1994
Decided December 7, 1994.)
Geoffrey Stem, Disciplinary Counsel, and Harald F. Craig III, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Respondent has failed to show cause why he should not receive discipline comparable to that imposed by the Supreme Court of Nevada. Accordingly, we hereby publicly reprimand respondent. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.