Case Name: Glenn V. Scott, Appellant, v. Cary A. Hardee, Governor; Ernest Amos, Comptroller; J. C. Luning, State Treasurer; Rivers Buford, Attorney General; W. A. McRae, Commissioner of Agriculture, of the State of Florida, of and Composing the Board of Commissioners of Everglades Drainage District, a Corporation Under the Laws of the State of Florida, Appellees
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1923-11-03
Citations: 86 Fla. 348
Docket Number: 
Parties: Glenn V. Scott, Appellant, v. Cary A. Hardee, Governor; Ernest Amos, Comptroller; J. C. Luning, State Treasurer; Rivers Buford, Attorney General; W. A. McRae, Commissioner of Agriculture, of the State of Florida, of and Composing the Board of Commissioners of Everglades Drainage District, a Corporation Under the Laws of the State of Florida, Appellees.
Judges: Taylor, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Browne, West and Terrell, J. J., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 86
Pages: 348–348

Head Matter:
Glenn V. Scott, Appellant, v. Cary A. Hardee, Governor; Ernest Amos, Comptroller; J. C. Luning, State Treasurer; Rivers Buford, Attorney General; W. A. McRae, Commissioner of Agriculture, of the State of Florida, of and Composing the Board of Commissioners of Everglades Drainage District, a Corporation Under the Laws of the State of Florida, Appellees.
Decision Filed November 3, 1923.
An Appeal from a Decree of the Circuit Court within and for the County of Leon; E. C. Love, Judge.
M. C. McIntosh, for Appellant;
J. B. Johnson, for Appellees.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and arguments of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being how advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court bé, and the same is hereby, affirmed, on the authority of Lainhart v. Catts, 73 Fla. 735, 75 South. Rep. 47; Bannerman v. Catts, 80 Fla. 170, 85 South. Rep. 336; Everglades Sugar & Land Co. v. Bryan, 81 Fla. 75, 87 South. Rep. 68; Berry v. Hardee, 83 Fla. 531, 91 South. Rep. 685.
Affirmed.
Taylor, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Browne, West and Terrell, J. J., concur.