Case Name: IN the INTEREST OF: E.L.B., A Minor,
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2015-07-21
Citations: 465 S.W.3d 909
Docket Number: No. ED 101781
Parties: IN the INTEREST OF: E.L.B., A Minor,
Judges: Before Lawrence E. Mooney, P.J., Lisa S. Van Amburg, C.J., and Clifford H. Ahrens, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 465
Pages: 909–910

Head Matter:
IN the INTEREST OF: E.L.B., A Minor,
No. ED 101781
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Filed: July 21, 2015
George E. Tillman, 228 N. Main Street, St. Charles, Missouri 63301, Michele Hammond-Guardian, Ad Litem, 340 North Main Street, Suite 205, St. Charles, Missouri 63301, for Appellant.
Charlene E. Stockman, 1700 S. River Road, St. Charles, Missouri 63303, for Respondent.
Before Lawrence E. Mooney, P.J., Lisa S. Van Amburg, C.J., and Clifford H. Ahrens, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
D.O. ("Father") appeals the judgment of the trial court terminating his parental rights to his son E.L.B. In his first three points, Father argues the court erred in terminating his parental rights pursuant to section 211.447.5, subsections (1), (3), and (6), because the evidence was insufficient to support termination on these grounds. In his fourth point, Father argues the court abused its discretion by finding it to be in Child's best interest to terminate his parental rights.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. A written opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, furnished the parties, for their information only, with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 84.16(b).
. All further statutory references are to R.S.Mo. (Cum. Supp. 2013) unless otherwise noted.