Case Name: Mayme CLEMONS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2001-02-21
Citations: 779 So. 2d 600
Docket Number: No. 4D00-3603
Parties: Mayme CLEMONS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: DELL, KLEIN and HAZOURI, JJ„ concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 779
Pages: 600–600

Head Matter:
Mayme CLEMONS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D00-3603.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb. 21, 2001.
Mayme Clemons, Florida City, pro se.
. Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Don M. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirm. As to Clemons' claim challenging the legality of her sentence in light of the unconstitutionality of the 1995 sentencing guidelines pursuant to Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000), our affirmance is without prejudice to refile a facially sufficient postconviction motion claim. See Rivero v. State, 758 So.2d 723 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).
This affirmance is likewise without prejudice to Clemons presenting her gaintime claim administratively to the Department of Corrections, and, if necessary, seeking review of the Department's ultimate decision through extraordinary writ petition to the circuit court in the county in which she is incarcerated. See Gatto v. State, 768 So.2d 1169 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).
DELL, KLEIN and HAZOURI, JJ" concur.