Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MONTE DEAN BEATY, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1992-12-30
Citations: 117 Or. App. 525
Docket Number: 91-3312-C1; CA A73150
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MONTE DEAN BEATY, Appellant.
Judges: Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Joseph, Chief Judge, and Deits, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 117
Pages: 525–526

Head Matter:
Submitted on record and briefs December 2,
conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing December 30, 1992
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MONTE DEAN BEATY, Appellant.
(91-3312-C1; CA A73150)
842 P2d 817
Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, and Louis R. Miles, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, filed the brief for appellant.
Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solictor General, and J. Dean Taylor, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Joseph, Chief Judge, and Deits, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant challenges the sentence imposed after his conviction for manufacture of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(1). The trial court ordered that no credit for time served in jail be applied. The state concedes that the trial court erred. State v. Jones, 113 Or App 228, 229, 832 P2d 459 (1992).
We accept the concession that the case should be remanded for resentencing. However, the record does not show definitively that defendant's pre-trial incarceration was for the manufacturing crime. On remand, the sentencing court should make that determination and resentence defendant accordingly. State v. Barber, 113 Or App 603, 605, 832 P2d 51 (1992).
Conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing.