Case Name: Leroy M. THURSTON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Steve SEAY; American General Finance Company, Defendants-Appellees; Leroy M. Thurston, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Herbert Beskins, Defendant-Appellee; Leroy M. Thurston, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Cathy Collins; Central Virginian Newspaper, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-04-03
Citations: 60 F. App'x 489
Docket Number: Nos. 03-1016, 03-1017, 03-1018
Parties: Leroy M. THURSTON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Steve SEAY; American General Finance Company, Defendants-Appellees. Leroy M. Thurston, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Herbert Beskins, Defendant-Appellee. Leroy M. Thurston, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Cathy Collins; Central Virginian Newspaper, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 60
Pages: 489–490

Head Matter:
Leroy M. THURSTON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Steve SEAY; American General Finance Company, Defendants-Appellees. Leroy M. Thurston, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Herbert Beskins, Defendant-Appellee. Leroy M. Thurston, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Cathy Collins; Central Virginian Newspaper, Defendants-Appellees.
Nos. 03-1016, 03-1017, 03-1018.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 24, 2003.
Decided April 3, 2003.
Leroy M. Thurston, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Leroy M. Thurston, Jr. appeals the district court's orders denying his applications to proceed in forma pauperis in each of his civil actions. Thurston fails to establish the district court erred in denying him leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, and dismiss these appeals. See Thurston v. Seay, No. CA-02-7-3; Thurston v. Beskins, No. CA-02-6-3; Thurston v. Collins, No. CA-02-5-3 (W.D.Va. Dec. 3, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.