Case Name: H. E. WOODWARD, Respondent, v. LEO DREHER, Appellant
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1930-02-06
Citations: 103 Cal. App. 743
Docket Number: Civ. No. 5741
Parties: H. E. WOODWARD, Respondent, v. LEO DREHER, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports
Volume: 103
Pages: 743–744

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 5741.
Second Appellate District, Division One.
February 6, 1930.]
H. E. WOODWARD, Respondent, v. LEO DREHER, Appellant.
Louis N. Whealton and Raymond J. Kirkpatrick for Appellant.
Doyle, Clarke & Thomas and W. Ward Johnson for Respondent.

Opinion:
CRAIG (ELLIOT), J., pro tem.
This action was commenced and prosecuted to judgment in the Municipal Court of the city of Long Beach. Defendant appealed to the Superior Court of Los Angeles County from that judgment. The Superior Court affirmed the judgment and defendant on June 28, 1927, appealed to this court from the judgment of the Superior Court affirming said judgment of the Municipal Court.
This is an action to recover the sum of $475, and the cause of action is based upon a written agreement to pay a commission to a realtor for procuring a purchaser for certain real property. The cause of action arose, as disclosed by the record, within Los Angeles County and within the city of Long Beach.
This appeal must be dismissed upon the ground that this court is now without- jurisdiction to proceed further in the case. The law applicable hereto is fully set forth in the decision in Berg v. Traeger (Cal. App.) [285 Pa'e. 332], this day filed by this court.
The appeal to' this court is dismissed.
Conrey, P. J., and Houser, J., concurred.
Reporter's Note: The Supreme Court granted a hearing in the case of Berg v. Traeger on April 7, 1930. The opinion of the Supreme Court, rendered on September 26, 1930, is reported in 210 Cal.