Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roberto CERVANTES-FLORES, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-01-19
Citations: 219 F. App'x 640
Docket Number: No. 06-50030
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roberto CERVANTES-FLORES, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 219
Pages: 640–640

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roberto CERVANTES-FLORES, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-50030.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 27, 2006.
Filed Jan. 19, 2007.
Steven E. Stone, Esq., San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Robert H. Rexrode, III, Esq., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: BRIGHT, BEA, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
The Honorable Myron H. Bright, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Roberto Cervantes-Flores appeals his sentence, which was reaffirmed on a limited remand pursuant to United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). Cervantes-Flores had no right to allocute during the limited remand under our decision in Ameline, our due process jurisprudence, or Rule 32 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. See United States v. Silva, 472 F.3d 683, 686-87 (9th Cir.2007).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.