Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rolando VILLANUEVA-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-11-27
Citations: 211 F. App'x 252
Docket Number: No. 05-41564
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rolando VILLANUEVA-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 211
Pages: 252–253

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rolando VILLANUEVA-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-41564
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Nov. 27, 2006.
James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern Dis trict of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.
Larry Chris lies, Rockport, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Rolando Villanueva-Garcia (Villanueva) appeals the sentence he received after he pleaded guilty to illegal reentry subsequent to deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Villanueva's argument that the district court failed to articulate oral and written reasons for its upward departure from the guidelines range of imprisonment does not amount to plain error. See United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 732-34, 113 S.Ct. 1770, 123 L.Ed.2d 508 (1993); United States v. Zuniga-Peralta, 442 F.3d 345, 347 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 2954, 165 L.Ed.2d 975 (2006). Nor does his argument that the extent of the departure was unreasonable show plain error. See Olano, 507 U.S. at 732-34, 113 S.Ct. 1770; Zuniga-Peralta, 442 F.3d at 347.
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.