Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Roberto MARTINEZ-ALVAREZ, also known as Jose Alberto Martinez, also known as Jose Roberto Martine Alvarez, also known as Bladimir Rodriguez Tovar, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-03-16
Citations: 597 F. App'x 285
Docket Number: No. 14-20012
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Roberto MARTINEZ-ALVAREZ, also known as Jose Alberto Martinez, also known as Jose Roberto Martine Alvarez, also known as Bladimir Rodriguez Tovar, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 597
Pages: 285–286

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Roberto MARTINEZ-ALVAREZ, also known as Jose Alberto Martinez, also known as Jose Roberto Martine Alvarez, also known as Bladimir Rodriguez Tovar, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 14-20012
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 16, 2015.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Timothy William Crooks, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Roberto Martinez-Alvarez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Martinez-Alvarez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.