Case Name: Karen LITTLE, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/Respondent, v. Anthony BROWN, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2017-04-25
Citations: 518 S.W.3d 858
Docket Number: NO. ED 103368
Parties: Karen LITTLE, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/Respondent, v. Anthony BROWN, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/Appellant.
Judges: Before Angela T. Quigless, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 518
Pages: 858–858

Head Matter:
Karen LITTLE, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/Respondent, v. Anthony BROWN, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/Appellant.
NO. ED 103368
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Filed: April 25, 2017
Anthony T. Brown, Bellevue, Nebraska, Pro se.
Jayson B. Lenox, St. Charles, Missouri, for Respondent.
Before Angela T. Quigless, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Anthony Brown appeals the trial court's judgment upon jury verdicts in favor of his divorce lawyer, Karen Little, after Little filed a suit on account to recover her fees and Brown countersued for malpractice. Finding no error, we affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).