Case Name: Bryan DAVIS, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO, Defendant, and Roger T. Benitez, Judge; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-03-09
Citations: 317 F. App'x 691
Docket Number: No. 08-56635
Parties: Bryan DAVIS, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO, Defendant, and Roger T. Benitez, Judge; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, HAWKINS and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 317
Pages: 691–692

Head Matter:
Bryan DAVIS, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO, Defendant, and Roger T. Benitez, Judge; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 08-56635.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 23, 2009.
Filed March 9, 2009.
Bryan Davis, Sr.,'Soledad, CA, pro se.
U.S. Attorney CV, Esquire, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, HAWKINS and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Upon review of the record, appellant's response to this court's October 30, 2008 order to show cause, and appellant's opening brief, this court hereby summarily affirms the district court's order dismissing appellant's complaint without leave to amend. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (summary affirmance appropriate where result is clear from face of record).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.