Case Name: State of Connecticut v. Rosalbina Novoa
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1992-06-25
Citations: 223 Conn. 905
Docket Number: 
Parties: State of Connecticut v. Rosalbina Novoa
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 223
Pages: 905–906

Head Matter:
State of Connecticut v. Rosalbina Novoa

Opinion:
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 27 Conn. App. 596, is granted, limited to the following question:
Bruce A. Sturman, public defender, in support of the petition.
Kevin T. Kane, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
Decided June 25, 1992
"In the circumstances of this case, was the use of wiretap evidence permitted by the provisions of General Statutes § 54-41p (b) and 54-41b?"