Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Barry K. BARNETT, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-03-05
Citations: 268 F. App'x 312
Docket Number: No. 07-10832
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Barry K. BARNETT, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 268
Pages: 312–312

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Barry K. BARNETT, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-10832
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 5, 2008.
John S. Bradford, Stockwell, Sievert, Yiccellio, Clements & Shaddock, Lake Charles, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Raymond J. Rodgers, Federal Public Defender’s Office Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before KING, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Barry K. Barnett raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Hinson, 429 F.3d 114, 119 (5th Cir.2005), which held that a defendant is not entitled to a jury trial to determine whether the terms of supervised release have been violated. The Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.