Case Name: Pingor, Appellant, v. Pingor
Court: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1959-03-18
Citations: 188 Pa. Super. 447
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 4
Parties: Pingor, Appellant, v. Pingor.
Judges: Before Rhodes, P. J., Hirt, Gunti-ier, Wright, Woodside, Ervin, and Watkins, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania Superior Court Reports
Volume: 188
Pages: 447–449

Head Matter:
Pingor, Appellant, v. Pingor.
March 18, 1959:
Argued December 8, 1958.
Before Rhodes, P. J., Hirt, Gunti-ier, Wright, Woodside, Ervin, and Watkins, JJ.
W. J. Kreneewics, for appellant.
Burke, Bowe, Dolbin & Heffner, for appellee, submitted a brief.

Opinion:
Opinion
Per Curiam,
In the disposition of this appeal we find ourselves in agreement with the lower court. The court well might have stressed other pertinent facts which support the conclusion that the husband here was not excluded from the marital home but that he separated from his wife voluntarily in 1951, as he had done on at least two other occasions in 1947 and 1949. For example, from his insistence on a split-up of a joint bank account in 1946, it is a fair inference under the circumstances that he even then contemplated separating from his wife. The lower court however adequately disposed of the case. Accordingly the order dismissing the plaintiff's complaint is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Curran, reported in 16 Pa. D. & C. 2d 258.