Case Name: JAMES S. RAFFERTY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. FRANK D. SCHATZMAN, COUNTY CLERK OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY; PETER BIRO, CHAIRMAN OF BOARD OF ELECTIONS OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY; AND FRANK D. SCHATZMAN, INDIVIDUALLY AND MIDDLESEX DEMOCRATIC COUNTY COMMITTEE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1963-10-28
Citations: 81 N.J. Super. 64
Docket Number: 
Parties: JAMES S. RAFFERTY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. FRANK D. SCHATZMAN, COUNTY CLERK OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY; PETER BIRO, CHAIRMAN OF BOARD OF ELECTIONS OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY; AND FRANK D. SCHATZMAN, INDIVIDUALLY AND MIDDLESEX DEMOCRATIC COUNTY COMMITTEE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 81
Pages: 64–64

Head Matter:
JAMES S. RAFFERTY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. FRANK D. SCHATZMAN, COUNTY CLERK OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY; PETER BIRO, CHAIRMAN OF BOARD OF ELECTIONS OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY; AND FRANK D. SCHATZMAN, INDIVIDUALLY AND MIDDLESEX DEMOCRATIC COUNTY COMMITTEE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued October 28, 1963
Decided October 28, 1963.
Before Judges Goldmank, Kilkenny and Collestek.
Mr. John J. Rafferty argued the cause for appellant.
Mr. Warren W. Wilentz argued the cause for respondents Schatzman and Biro.
Mr. John A. Lynch appeared for respondent Middlesex Democratic County Committee.

Opinion:
Pee Cueiam.
The judgment of the Law Division is affirmed essentially for the reasons stated in the opinion filed by Judge Halpern, 81 N. J. Super. 58 (Law Div. 1963). We consider the statute, N. J. S. A. 19:27—11, as completely controlling.