Case Name: EMIL ALBRECHT, RESPONDENT, v. ALBIN THIEME, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1922-10-06
Citations: 98 N.J.L. 249
Docket Number: 
Parties: EMIL ALBRECHT, RESPONDENT, v. ALBIN THIEME, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 98
Pages: 249–249

Head Matter:
EMIL ALBRECHT, RESPONDENT, v. ALBIN THIEME, APPELLANT.
Argued June 28, 1922
Decided October 6, 1922.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 97 N. J. L. 103.
For the respondent, J. Vincent Barnitt.
For the appellant, Ward & McGinnis.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justiee Katzenbach in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance— Vim Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, White, Heppenheimee, Williams, Gardner, Ackebson, Yan Buskirk, JJ. 12.
For reversal — TJone.