Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Angelo Albert PLATER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-04-22
Citations: 322 F. App'x 353
Docket Number: No. 08-7135
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Angelo Albert PLATER, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 322
Pages: 353–353

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Angelo Albert PLATER, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 08-7135.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 16, 2009.
Decided: April 22, 2009.
Sapna Mirehandani, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellant. Deborah A. Johnston, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, Barbara Slaymaker Sale, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpubhshed PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpubhshed opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Angelo Albert Plater appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See United States v. Hood, 556 F.3d 226 (4th Cir.2009). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Plater, No. 8:97-cr-00408-PJM-1, 2008 WL 2543435 (D. Md. filed June 24, 2008; entered June 25, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.