Case Name: Fernwood Trout Hatchery, Inc., Respondent, v. State of New York, Appellant; Michael J. Reilly et al., Respondents, v. State of New York, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1975-12-24
Citations: 50 A.D.2d 1035
Docket Number: Claim No. 57987; Claim No. 57988.
Parties: Fernwood Trout Hatchery, Inc., Respondent, v State of New York, Appellant. Michael J. Reilly et al., Respondents, v State of New York, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 50
Pages: 1035–1035

Head Matter:
(December 24, 1975)
Fernwood Trout Hatchery, Inc., Respondent, v State of New York, Appellant. Michael J. Reilly et al., Respondents, v State of New York, Appellant.
(Claim No. 57987.)
(Claim No. 57988.)

Opinion:
— Appeal from so much of an order of the Court of Claims, entered May 19, 1975, as granted claimants' motion for inspection of certain documents with respect to the filing of the claim. None of the various written documents, work orders and inspection reports which were directed to be produced by the State were requested in claimants' notice of motion or their supporting affidavit. Accordingly, the Court of Claims' grant of relief was beyond that which was sought and, therefore, was improper. As to claimants' contention that the Court of Claims erred in failing to direct the identification and production of certain employees alleged to have actually performed work which was related to this claim, no notice of appeal has been filed by claimants and we are precluded from reviewing this portion of the order (Ferguson v Bruckman, 164 NY 481). Order insofar as appealed from, reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Kane, Koreman, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.