Case Name: LOMA FRUIT CO. v. INTERNATIONAL NAV. CO., Limited, et al.; SAME v. G. WARREN & CO., Limited, et al.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1925-12-21
Citations: 11 F.2d 124
Docket Number: Nos. 142, 143
Parties: LOMA FRUIT CO. v. INTERNATIONAL NAV. CO., Limited, et al. SAME v. G. WARREN & CO., Limited, et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 11
Pages: 124–128

Head Matter:
LOMA FRUIT CO. v. INTERNATIONAL NAV. CO., Limited, et al. SAME v. G. WARREN & CO., Limited, et al.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
December 21, 1925.)
Nos. 142, 143.
A. S. H. Bristow, of New York City (William Mann, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.
Burlingham, Veeder, Masten & Fearey, of New York City (Roscoe H. Hupper, of New York City, of counsel), for appellees International Nav. Co., Limited, and G. Warren & Co., Limited.
Oudin, Kilbreth & Sehackno, of New York City (James T. Kilbreth, of New York City, of counsel), for appellee Loma Fruit Co.
Before HOUGH and MANTON, Circuit Judges.
Petitions for writs of certiorari denied, Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Loma Fruit Co., 46 S. Ct. 471, 70 L. Ed. —.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Deerees affirmed, upon the opinion of Ward, Circuit Judge, in the lower court.