Case Name: Victoria NICHOLSON, Sam Nicholson, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-04-29
Citations: 275 F. App'x 878
Docket Number: No. 07-15868
Parties: Victoria NICHOLSON, Sam Nicholson, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 275
Pages: 878–879

Head Matter:
Victoria NICHOLSON, Sam Nicholson, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 07-15868
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
April 29, 2008.
J. Charles Wilson, Mobile, AL, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
Charles Baer, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Mobile, AL, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The complaint in this case alleges that the Department of Agriculture erroneously, arbitrarily and with intent to discriminate against Victoria Nicholson and her husband placed Victoria Nicholson's loan in foreclosure in violation of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1691 et seq. The Secretary moved the district court for summary judgment, and the court granted his motion on two alternative grounds: the claim was time-barred, and the Nicholsons failed to make out a prima facie case of discrimination.
The Nicholsons now appeal. We agree that the claim is time-barred and that the Nicholsons failed to establish a prima fa-cie case. The district court's judgment is, accordingly,
AFFIRMED.