Case Name: IN RE: John F. CURRAN, III, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-11-14
Citations: 701 F. App'x 281
Docket Number: No. 17-1973
Parties: IN RE: John F. CURRAN, III, Petitioner.
Judges: Before MOTZ, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 701
Pages: 281–282

Head Matter:
IN RE: John F. CURRAN, III, Petitioner.
No. 17-1973
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: November 6, 2017
Decided: November 14, 2017
John F. Curran, III, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before MOTZ, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
John. F. Curran, III, petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED