Case Name: Emeka EKE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, NA, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-12-23
Citations: 407 F. App'x 634
Docket Number: No. 10-2036
Parties: Emeka EKE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, NA, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 407
Pages: 634–635

Head Matter:
Emeka EKE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, NA, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 10-2036.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 10, 2010.
Decided: Dec. 23, 2010.
Emeka Eke, Appellant Pro Se. Michael E. Lacy, Troutman Sanders, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Emeka Eke appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to the Bank of America, NA and dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Eke v. Bank of America, NA, 3:09-cv-00488-RLW, 2010 WL 3122806 (E.D.Va. Aug. 6, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.