Case Name: Audrel Jack WATSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Warden WRIGHT; R. E. Clarke; Mr. Graves; Ms. Jones; Unknown VA DOC Ombudsman; Unknown GEO/LVCC Individuals; Unknown VA DOC Individuals, Defendants-Appellees, and Harold Clarke; Unknown Chief Executive Officer of GEO, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-02-27
Citations: 712 F. App'x 328
Docket Number: No. 17-7435
Parties: Audrel Jack WATSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Warden WRIGHT; R. E. Clarke; Mr. Graves; Ms. Jones; Unknown VA DOC Ombudsman; Unknown GEO/LVCC Individuals; Unknown VA DOC Individuals, Defendants-Appellees, and Harold Clarke; Unknown Chief Executive Officer of GEO, Defendants
Judges: Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 712
Pages: 328–328

Head Matter:
Audrel Jack WATSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Warden WRIGHT; R. E. Clarke; Mr. Graves; Ms. Jones; Unknown VA DOC Ombudsman; Unknown GEO/LVCC Individuals; Unknown VA DOC Individuals, Defendants-Appellees, and Harold Clarke; Unknown Chief Executive Officer of GEO, Defendants
No. 17-7435
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: February 22, 2018
Decided: February 27, 2018
Audrel Jack Watson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Michael Gordon Matheson, THOMPSON MCMULLAN PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Audrel Jack Watson, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm .for the reasons stated by the district court. Watson v. Wright, No. 1:15-cv-01214-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. Oct. 10, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED