Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward Hugh OKUN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-07-24
Citations: 610 F. App'x 272
Docket Number: No. 15-6548
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward Hugh OKUN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 610
Pages: 272–273

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward Hugh OKUN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-6548.
United States- Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 21, 2015.
Decided: July 24, 2015.
Edward Hugh Okun, Appellant Pro Se.
Richard Daniel Cooke, Michael Steven Dry, Assistant United States Attorneys, Jessica D. Aber, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Edward Hugh Okun appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a new trial under Fed.R.Crim.Pr 33. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Okun, No. 3:08-cr-00132-REP-1, 2015 WL 1402142 (E.D.Va. Mar. 25, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.