Case Name: Diane Furey, Appellant, v. Lester Wallman et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2006-12-05
Citations: 35 A.D.3d 354
Docket Number: 
Parties: Diane Furey, Appellant, v Lester Wallman et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 35
Pages: 354–354

Head Matter:
Diane Furey, Appellant, v Lester Wallman et al., Respondents.
[824 NYS2d 727]

Opinion:
In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schulman, J), dated May 19, 2005, which granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied her cross motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.
Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof granting that branch of the defendants' motion which was for summaiy judgment dismissing the legal malpractice cause of action insofar as it relates to the issue of the computation of the basic child support obligation pursuant to the Child Support Standards Act and substituting therefor a provision denying that branch of the motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The defendants failed to make a prima facie showing that the plaintiff would be unable to prove the elements of the legal malpractice cause of action insofar as it relates to the issue of the computation of the basic child support obligation pursuant to the Child Support Standards Act.
The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit. Miller, J.E, Schmidt, Goldstein and Skelos, JJ., concur.