Case Name: Carlos M. SWANN, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee
Court: District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Delaware
Decision Date: 2001-11-16
Citations: 785 A.2d 663
Docket Number: No. 98-CF-892
Parties: Carlos M. SWANN, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee.
Judges: Before RUIZ and REID, Associate Judges, and NEBEKER, Senior Judge.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 785
Pages: 663–666

Head Matter:
Carlos M. SWANN, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee.
No. 98-CF-892.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Nov. 16, 2001.
Before RUIZ and REID, Associate Judges, and NEBEKER, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
AMENDED ORDER
PER CURIAM.
On consideration of this court's October 3, 2001, order to show cause, appellant's unopposed motion to extend time to file reply brief, the lodged reply brief, and appellant's counsel's motion to withdraw for business reasons, it is
ORDERED that appellant's unopposed motion to extend time to file reply brief is granted and the Clerk shall file the lodged reply brief. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's counsel's motion to withdraw for business reasons is granted. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that this appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as being taken from a non-appealable order. See Smith v. United States, 686 A.2d 537 (D.C.1996), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 839, 118 S.Ct. 115, 139 L.Ed.2d 67 (1997); Taylor v. United States, 603 A.2d 451 (D.C.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 852, 113 S.Ct. 155, 121 L.Ed.2d 105 (1992).