Case Name: Donald O. MANUCY, Husband, Appellant, v. Mary YURGALEWICZ, Wife, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2005-07-21
Citations: 906 So. 2d 1227
Docket Number: No. 1D05-2364
Parties: Donald O. MANUCY, Husband, Appellant, v. Mary YURGALEWICZ, Wife, Appellee.
Judges: KAHN, C.J., PADOVANO and LEWIS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 906
Pages: 1227–1228

Head Matter:
Donald O. MANUCY, Husband, Appellant, v. Mary YURGALEWICZ, Wife, Appellee.
No. 1D05-2364.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
July 21, 2005.
Tyrie A. Boyer, Jacksonville, for Appellant.
Lisa A. March, Ponte Vedra Beach, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the appellant's Motion to Hold in Abeyance, which the Court treats as a response to its show cause order of June 7, 2000, the Court has determined that the appellant has failed to demonstrate that the order on appeal is a final order or otherwise appealable nonfi-nal order.
An order dissolving the marriage but reserving jurisdiction over issues such as child support, child custody, alimony and/or property issues, is not final. Hoffman v. O'Connor, 802 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); Klein v. Klein, 551 So.2d 1235 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Thus, the order on appeal, which retains jurisdiction to determine personal property distribution in the event of a disagreement between the parties, is a nonfinal order. For this reason, the appeal is hereby dismissed. The ap pellant's Motion to Hold in Abeyance is denied.
DISMISSED.
KAHN, C.J., PADOVANO and LEWIS, JJ., concur.