Case Name: IN THE MATTER OF Lonnie POSTON, as Administrator of the Estate of Zachary Poston, Deceased v. Shirlie FEARS, et al.
Court: Arkansas Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Arkansas
Decision Date: 1992-05-26
Citations: 309 Ark. 413
Docket Number: 92-44
Parties: IN THE MATTER OF Lonnie POSTON, as Administrator of the Estate of Zachary Poston, Deceased v. Shirlie FEARS, et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Arkansas Reports
Volume: 309
Pages: 413–414

Head Matter:
IN THE MATTER OF Lonnie POSTON, as Administrator of the Estate of Zachary Poston, Deceased v. Shirlie FEARS, et al.
92-44
828 S.W.2d 845
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Opinion delivered May 26, 1992
Walters Law Firm, P.A., by: Michael Hamby, for appellant.
Pryor, Barry, Smith, Karber & Alford, by: Thomas B. Pryor, for appellee.

Opinion:
Robert H. Dudley, Justice.
The plaintiff filed suit against three defendants. Two of the three defendants filed motions for judgments on the pleadings. See A.R.C.P. Rule 12(c). The trial court granted the motions for the two defendants, but the third separate defendant remains in the suit below. Thus, the trial court did not grant a final judgment, see A.R.C.P. Rule 54(b), and yet, the plaintiff seeks to appeal. We dismiss the appeal because the order entered is not an appealable order. Burnley v. Mutual of Omaha, 291 Ark. 185, 723 S.W.2d 363 (1987).