Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Yagoub M. MOHAMED, a/k/a Mohammed A. Yagoub, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-08-23
Citations: 141 F. App'x 200
Docket Number: No. 05-6124
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Yagoub M. MOHAMED, a/k/a Mohammed A. Yagoub, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 141
Pages: 200–200

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Yagoub M. MOHAMED, a/k/a Mohammed A. Yagoub, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 05-6124.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 18, 2005.
Decided: Aug. 23, 2005.
Yagoub M. Mohamed, Appellant pro se. Brian Ronald Hood, Assistant United States Attorney, Gregg Robert Nivala, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia; Michael Calvin Moore, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Yagoub M. Mohamed appeals the district court's order denying his motion to reopen the time to file an appeal of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Mohamed, Nos. CR-01-177; CA-03-58-3 (E.D.Va. Jan. 11, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED