Case Name: Jack Garliner, Appellant-Respondent, v. Allan Herschell Company, Inc., Respondent-Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1959-07-09
Citations: 8 A.D.2d 989
Docket Number: 
Parties: Jack Garliner, Appellant-Respondent, v. Allan Herschell Company, Inc., Respondent-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 8
Pages: 989–989

Head Matter:
Jack Garliner, Appellant-Respondent, v. Allan Herschell Company, Inc., Respondent-Appellant.

Opinion:
Judgment reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the plain tiff-appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the evidence presented a question of fact which should have been presented to the jury. All concur. (Cross appeals from a judgment of Monroe Trial Term dismissing plaintiff's complaint and defendant's counterclaim after motions by both parties as to the complaint and a motion by plaintiff as to defendant's counterclaim, in an action for damages 'for an alleged breach of contract.) Present — MeCurn, P. J., Kimball, Williams, Bastow and Goldman, JJ.