Case Name: Eduard LORENZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Patricia H. HARRINGTON, Clerk, Supreme Court of Virginia, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-09-15
Citations: 332 F. App'x 159
Docket Number: No. 09-6920
Parties: Eduard LORENZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Patricia H. HARRINGTON, Clerk, Supreme Court of Virginia, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 332
Pages: 159–160

Head Matter:
Eduard LORENZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Patricia H. HARRINGTON, Clerk, Supreme Court of Virginia, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 09-6920.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 10, 2009.
Decided: Sept. 15, 2009.
Eduard Lorenz, Appellant Pro Se.
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d) (2006).

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Eduard Lorenz appeals a district court order denying a petition for a writ of mandamus in which he sought an order from the court directing that the Clerk of the Supreme Court of Virginia allow him to proceed in forma pauperis. We affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lorenz v. Harrington, No. 1:09-cv-00456-JCD-IDD (E.D.Va. May 4, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.