Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Timothy GALLAGHER, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-05-14
Citations: 75 S.W.3d 333
Docket Number: No. ED 79452
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Timothy GALLAGHER, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before GEORGE W. DRAPER III, P.J., MARY R. RUSSELL, J., and MARY K. HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 75
Pages: 333–333

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Timothy GALLAGHER, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 79452.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
May 14, 2002.
Jennifer F. Walsh, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Nicole E. Gorovsky, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before GEORGE W. DRAPER III, P.J., MARY R. RUSSELL, J., and MARY K. HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Timothy Gallagher, appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance, cocaine base, in violation of section 195.202, RSMo 2000. He argues the trial court abused its discretion in excluding impeachment evidence.
Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the trial did not err. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).