Case Name: Newberry v. The State
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1925-11-12
Citations: 34 Ga. App. 533
Docket Number: 16764
Parties: Newberry v. The State.
Judges: Luhe and Bloodworth,: JJ., eoneur.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 34
Pages: 533–534

Head Matter:
16764.
Newberry v. The State.
Decided November 12, 1925.

Opinion:
Broyles, C. J.
1. The amendment to the motion for a new trial contained but one ground, to wit, that the court erred in refusing the defendant's motion to direct a verdict in his favor. Under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court the refusal to direct a verdict is never error.
2. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the overruling of the motion for a new trial was not error.
Judgment affirmed.
Luhe and Bloodworth,: JJ., eoneur.
B. B. Marlin, J. H. Fletcher, for plaintiff in error.
B. T. Castellow, solicitor-general,' B. B. Arnold, E. C. Hill, contra.