Case Name: Frank REAVES, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. General Eric K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, et al., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-04-06
Citations: 421 F. App'x 291
Docket Number: No. 10-7606
Parties: Frank REAVES, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. General Eric K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, et al., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 421
Pages: 291–291

Head Matter:
Frank REAVES, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. General Eric K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, et al., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 10-7606.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 31, 2011.
Decided: April 6, 2011.
Frank Reaves, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Frank Reaves appeals the district court's order dismissing his petition for a writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Reaves v. Shinseki, No. 2:10-cv-00495-HCM-TEM (E.D.Va. Oct. 8, 2010). We deny Reaves' motion for appointment of counsel and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.