Case Name: Herbert GOODMAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2008-06-11
Citations: 984 So. 2d 607
Docket Number: No. 3D08-1100
Parties: Herbert GOODMAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SHEPHERD, CORTIÑAS, and SALTER, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 984
Pages: 607–608

Head Matter:
Herbert GOODMAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D08-1100.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
June 11, 2008.
Herbert Goodman, in proper person. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, for ap-pellee.
Before SHEPHERD, CORTIÑAS, and SALTER, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Based on our review of a prior motion for postconviction relief filed by the defendant, Goodman v. State, 973 So.2d 454, 2007 WL 4249866 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (table) (affirming the lower court's summary denial of postconviction relief), we find that the defendant's current motion is successive, and that the defendant is not entitled to further relief. See State v. McBride, 848 So.2d 287 (Fla.2003); Pleasure v. State, 931 So.2d 1000 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (holding that a defendant is not entitled to successive review of an issue already decided against him on its merits). We therefore affirm.
Affirmed.