Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Charles Wesley WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-10-14
Citations: 621 F. App'x 869
Docket Number: No. 15-1616
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Charles Wesley WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 621
Pages: 869–870

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Charles Wesley WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-1616.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 5, 2015.
Filed: Oct. 14, 2015.
Troy K. Stabenow, Asst. Fed. Public Defender, Jefferson City, MO (Laine Car-darella, Fed. Public Defender, Kansas City, MO, on the brief), for appellant.
Jim Y. Lynn, Asst. U.S. Atty., Jefferson City, MO, for appellee.
Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
At a supervised-release revocation hearing, Charles Williams admitted to the district court that he had violated several of his release conditions while serving a period of supervised release on a federal criminal sentence. The court revoked supervised release and imposed a revocation sentence of 21 months in prison — the bottom of the Chapter 7 revocation range— and 1 year of additional supervised release. On appeal, Williams contends that the sentence is substantively unreasonable because it is greater than necessary to comply with the purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 3558(a). After careful review, we conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion. See United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 915-16 (8th Cir.2009) (standard of review). The judgment is affirmed, and we grant counsel leave to withdraw.
. The Honorable Beth Phillips, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.