Case Name: Charles Parkinson, Respondent, v. George H. Munroe and Alexander Munroe, Composing the Firm of Munroe & Munroe, and Others, Impleaded with Lord's Court Building and The Empire State Surety Company, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1909-02
Citations: 130 A.D. 903
Docket Number: 
Parties: Charles Parkinson, Respondent, v. George H. Munroe and Alexander Munroe, Composing the Firm of Munroe & Munroe, and Others, Impleaded with Lord’s Court Building and The Empire State Surety Company, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 130
Pages: 903–903

Head Matter:
Charles Parkinson, Respondent, v. George H. Munroe and Alexander Munroe, Composing the Firm of Munroe & Munroe, and Others, Impleaded with Lord’s Court Building and The Empire State Surety Company, Appellants.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Ingraham, J., dissented on the ground that the evidence is not sufficient to show a consent by the appellant within the Lien Law.
See Laws of 1897, chap. 418, § 3.— [Rep.