Case Name: J.J. Detweiler Enterprises, Inc., Also Known as J.J. Detweiler, Inc., Appellant, v. Charlotte Yazowski, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1994-09-30
Citations: 207 A.D.2d 1033
Docket Number: 
Parties: J.J. Detweiler Enterprises, Inc., Also Known as J.J. Detweiler, Inc., Appellant, v Charlotte Yazowski, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 207
Pages: 1033–1033

Head Matter:
J.J. Detweiler Enterprises, Inc., Also Known as J.J. Detweiler, Inc., Appellant, v Charlotte Yazowski, Respondent.
[617 NYS2d 699]

Opinion:
—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion granted. Memorandum: Supreme Court should have granted plaintiff leave to amend its complaint. Absent prejudice or surprise, leave to amend should be freely granted (CPLR 3025 [b]). We do not rule upon the merits or legal sufficiency of the proposed amendment (see, Kusak v Allstate Ins. Co., 190 AD2d 1050). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Tenney, J.—Amended Complaint.) Present—Lawton, J. P., Fallon, Wesley, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.