Case Name: Charles BIONDO, Appellant, v. UNION INSURANCE COMPANY OF PROVIDENCE, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-12-06
Citations: 179 S.W.3d 396
Docket Number: No. ED 86301
Parties: Charles BIONDO, Appellant, v. UNION INSURANCE COMPANY OF PROVIDENCE, Respondent.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 179
Pages: 396–397

Head Matter:
Charles BIONDO, Appellant, v. UNION INSURANCE COMPANY OF PROVIDENCE, Respondent.
No. ED 86301.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Dec. 6, 2005.
Donald V. Nangle, Attorney at Law, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Robert W. Cockerham, John F. Mahon, Brown and James, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Charles Biondo ("Biondo"), appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Charles County granting summary judgment in favor of Respondent, Union Insurance Company of Providence ("Union Insurance"). Biondo had filed an action against Union Insurance for breach of his insurance policy and sought compensation for damage to the foundation of his home. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.