Case Name: William HOHLT, Employee/Appellant, v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION, Employer/Respondent, and Treasurer State of Missouri, as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Additional Party/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-08-15
Citations: 25 S.W.3d 591
Docket Number: No. ED 77277
Parties: William HOHLT, Employee/Appellant, v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION, Employer/Respondent, and Treasurer State of Missouri, as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Additional Party/Respondent.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, Jr., J., and JAMES R. DOWD, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 25
Pages: 591–591

Head Matter:
William HOHLT, Employee/Appellant, v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION, Employer/Respondent, and Treasurer State of Missouri, as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Additional Party/Respondent.
No. ED 77277.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Aug. 15, 2000.
Evan J. Beatty, St. Louis, for appellant.
Batsy J. Levitt, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, Jr., J., and JAMES R. DOWD, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Claimant, William Hohlt, appeals from a decision by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying his claim for workers' compensation. The decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record; no error of law appears. A written opinion would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
The decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).