Case Name: STATE v. SMITH
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1912-11-12
Citations: 63 Or. 292
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE v. SMITH.
Judges: 
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 63
Pages: 292–293

Head Matter:
Argued October 22,
decided November 12, 1912.
STATE v. SMITH.
(127 Pac. 691.)
From Crook: William L. Bradshaw, Judge.
The defendants, Perry Smith, Harry Keener, Dave Biggerstaff, Billy McGee, George Gardner, George At-well, George B. Brown, William Snell, and James Green were severally convicted of selling intoxicating liquors, and appeal.
Affirmed.
For appellants there was a brief over the names of Mr. Vernon A. Forbes, Mr. George L. Bernier and Mr. Hollis S. Wilson, with an oral argument by Mr. Wilson.
For the State there was a brief over the names of Mr. Fred W. Wilson, District Attorney, and Mr. Andrew M. Crawford, Attorney General, with an oral argument by Mr. Crawford.

Opinion:
Mr. Justice Moore
delivered the opinion of the court.
The defendant, Perry Smith, was convicted of the crime of selling intoxicating liquor in Crook County in violation of the local option law, and he appeals from the judgment rendered against him. It was stipulated herein, and also in the following cases in which the hereinafter named defendants were severally convicted of the same offense, alleged to have been committed in that county, and individually appeals, to wit: State v. Harry Geener, State v. Dave Biggerstaff, State v. Billy McGee, State v. George Gardner, State v. George Atwell, State v. George B. Brown, and State v. William Snell and James Green, that the decision rendered in the case of State v. Ramsey, 63 Or. 291 (127 Pac. 691), should govern the determination of each of these causes.
It results, therefore, that the judgments thus rendered against the several defendants should be affirmed, and it is so ordered. Affirmed.