Case Name: Joseph KINARD, Appellant v. OFFICE OF BAR COUNSEL, Board on Professional Responsibility, et al., Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-02-11
Citations: 409 F. App'x 357
Docket Number: No. 10-7099
Parties: Joseph KINARD, Appellant v. OFFICE OF BAR COUNSEL, Board on Professional Responsibility, et al., Appellees.
Judges: BEFORE: GINSBURG, ROGERS, and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 409
Pages: 357–357

Head Matter:
Joseph KINARD, Appellant v. OFFICE OF BAR COUNSEL, Board on Professional Responsibility, et al., Appellees.
No. 10-7099.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Feb. 11, 2011.
Joseph Kinard, Oxford, WI, pro se.
BEFORE: GINSBURG, ROGERS, and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. RApp. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's order filed July 22, 2010, be affirmed. Whatever the scope of appellant's right of access to Bar Counsel records, the 1997 and 2009 letters filed as exhibits to his brief indicate that the appellees do not have copies of the oath of office at issue here, and appellant offers nothing undermining this conclusion. We therefore affirm the dismissal of his complaint for failure to state a claim.
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. RApp. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.