Case Name: Louis HAMBURGER, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent; Samuel HAMBURGER, Petitioner, v. SAME
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1945-03-12
Citations: 147 F.2d 856
Docket Number: No. 9861
Parties: Louis HAMBURGER, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. Samuel HAMBURGER, Petitioner, v. SAME.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 147
Pages: 856–857

Head Matter:
Louis HAMBURGER, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. Samuel HAMBURGER, Petitioner, v. SAME.
No. 9861.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
March 12, 1945.
Edward S. Reid, Jr., and Harold M. Shapero, both of Detroit, Mich., for petitioners.
Samuel O. Clark, Jr., J. P. Wenchel, Se-wall Key, Helen R. Carloss, Muriel S. Paul, and John W. Smith, all of Washington, D. C., for respondent.
Before HICKS, ALLEN, and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
These consolidated causes were heard upon the record, briefs and arguments of cotinsel, and it appearing that there was substantial evidence to support the findings of the Tax Court, it is therefore ordered and adjudged that the decisions of that court entered on February 14, 1944, be and the same are upon the grounds and for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the court promulgated on December 24, 1943.