Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ellis J. CRUM and Norma N. Crum, Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-07-12
Citations: 297 F.3d 541
Docket Number: Nos. 01-3750, 01-3751
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ellis J. CRUM and Norma N. Crum, Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: Before FAIRCHILD, COFFEY, KANNE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 297
Pages: 541–542

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ellis J. CRUM and Norma N. Crum, Defendants-Appellants.
Nos. 01-3750, 01-3751.
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
July 12, 2002.
Before FAIRCHILD, COFFEY, KANNE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
Before the court is Appellants' Petition For Rehearing With Suggestion For Rehearing En Banc, which was filed May 31, 2002. On consideration of the petition for rehearing, all members of the original panel have voted to deny the petition. Accordingly, the petition for rehearing is DENIED. Furthermore, no active judge has called for a vote as to whether this case should be reheard en banc. Accordingly, the suggestion for rehearing en banc is DENIED.
Furthermore, at this time, Appellants and their attorney, Kurt S. St. Angelo, are ORDERED to show cause as to why they should not be SANCTIONED for filing a frivolous petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc. Said showing shall be made within ten (10) days of this date.
. Hon. Thomas E. Fairchild has voted to deny rehearing but does not join in the order to show cause as to why the appellants and their attorney should not be sanctioned for filing a frivolous petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc.