Case Name: In the Matter of John Coffey et al., Appellants, v. Daniel W. Joy, as Commissioner of the Department of Housing Preservation and Development of the City of New York, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1983-04-28
Citations: 59 N.Y.2d 643
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of John Coffey et al., Appellants, v Daniel W. Joy, as Commissioner of the Department of Housing Preservation and Development of the City of New York, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 59
Pages: 643–645

Head Matter:
In the Matter of John Coffey et al., Appellants, v Daniel W. Joy, as Commissioner of the Department of Housing Preservation and Development of the City of New York, Respondent.
Decided April 28, 1983
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Howard C. Amron for appellants.
Harry Michaelson and Alan W. Ginsberg for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (91 AD2d 923).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons.