Case Name: Philip Duffy, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Joseph Archer and Another, Defendants and Appellants
Court: New York City Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1892-11
Citations: 1 Misc. 513
Docket Number: 
Parties: Philip Duffy, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Joseph Archer and Another, Defendants and Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 1
Pages: 513–513

Head Matter:
Philip Duffy, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Joseph Archer and Another, Defendants and Appellants.
Charles De Hart Brown, for plaintiff (respondent).
Thornton, Earl & Kiendls, for defendants (appellants).

Opinion:
Newburger, J.
This action was brought to recover a balance due upon a contract to excavate a rock upon certain premises in this city.
The answer admitted the contract, but denied that the plaintiff had excavated the number of yards claimed in the complaint.
A careful examination of the appeal book fails to disclose any error on the part of the trial justice in the admission or exclusion of testimony, and as there are no questions raised by the learned counsel for the appellant, the judgment must be affirmed, with costs.
Ehrlich, Ch. J., and Fitzsimons, J., concur,
Judgment affirmed.