Case Name: Ronald BRADLEY et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. William J. MILLIKEN, Governor of Michigan, and Michigan State Board of Education, et al., Defendants-Appellants, Board of Education, City of Detroit, Michigan, et al., Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1975-06-19
Citations: 519 F.2d 679
Docket Number: No. 75-1668
Parties: Ronald BRADLEY et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. William J. MILLIKEN, Governor of Michigan, and Michigan State Board of Education, et al., Defendants-Appellants, Board of Education, City of Detroit, Michigan, et al., Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 519
Pages: 679–681

Head Matter:
Ronald BRADLEY et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. William J. MILLIKEN, Governor of Michigan, and Michigan State Board of Education, et al., Defendants-Appellants, Board of Education, City of Detroit, Michigan, et al., Defendants.
No. 75-1668.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
June 19, 1975.
Certiorari Denied Nov. 3,1975.
See 96 S.Ct. 280.
Frank J. Kelley, Atty. Gen. of Mich., Lansing, Mich., Theodore Sachs, Detroit, Mich., for defendants-appellants.
Louis R. Lucas, Ratner, Sugarmon & Lucas, Memphis, Tenn., for plaintiffs-ap-pellees.
Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and EDWARDS and PECK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan requiring the State defendants to acquire 150 buses to be used in the Detroit desegregation plan to be implemented by the order of the District Court. The case was submitted on briefs and oral arguments this June 11, 1975.
Upon consideration, this court concludes that the District Judge had no choice, under the decision of the Supreme Court in Milliken v. Bradley, 418 U.S. 717, 94 S.Ct. 3112, 41 L.Ed.2d 1069 (1974), except to order the immediate acquisition of school buses. No party to the proceeding made any representation to the contrary during the course of the hearing in this court.
Likewise, this court has no choice under the just cited decision of the Supreme Court except to affirm the result of the order of the District Court requiring the acquisition of school buses now, as herein modified. This modification is based upon the representations to this court made by the State defendants and is consistent with the spirit and purposes of the constitutional and statutory provisions and the case law of the State of Michigan as recited in said representations. Said order is modified to read as follows:
Plaintiffs having moved for an order requiring the purchase of transportation equipment, and the court having reviewed the briefs submitted by the parties and having considered the arguments of counsel and being fully advised in the premises:
It is, therefore, ordered, pursuant to Bradley v. Milliken, 484 F.2d 215, 258 (6th Cir. 1973), rev. on other grounds, 418 U.S. 717, 94 S.Ct. 3112, 41 L.Ed.2d 1069 (1974), that the Order for Acquisi tion of Transportation entered by this court on July 11, 1972, be and hereby is reinstated but modified as follows:
1. The Detroit School Board, defendants, shall acquire by purchase, lease or other contractual arrangements 150, 66-passenger yellow school buses meeting the requirements of Michigan Law, to be used in the Detroit Desegregation Plan to be implemented by order of the court. Such purchase, lease or other contractual arrangements shall be consummated no later than July 3, 1975.
2. The State defendants shall bear the costs of this acquisition to the extent of 75% thereof , and the State defendants .shall take all necessary steps utilizing existing funds already allocated, or to be allocated and by re-allocating existing or new funds, to pay or reimburse the State's share of such transportation acquisition.
. In Milliken v. Bradley, 418 U.S. 717, 726, 94 S.Ct. 3112, 3118, 41 L.Ed.2d 1069 (1974), the Supreme Court said:
"The District Court also found that the State of Michigan had committed several constitutional violations with respect to the exercise of its general responsibility for, and supervision of, public education. [Footnote omitted.] The State, for example, was found to have failed, until the 1971 Session of the Michigan Legislature, to provide authorization or funds for the transportation of pupils within Detroit regardless of their poverty or distance from the school to which they were assigned; during this same period the State provided many neighboring, mostly white, suburban districts the full range of state-supported transportation."