Case Name: RUTH EUNA RUTHERFORD et al. v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES (a Municipal Corporation) et al., Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1930-12-31
Citations: 211 Cal. 777
Docket Number: L. A. No. 10657
Parties: RUTH EUNA RUTHERFORD et al. v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES (a Municipal Corporation) et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Reports
Volume: 211
Pages: 777–777

Head Matter:
[L. A. No. 10657.
In Bank.
December 31, 1930.]
RUTH EUNA RUTHERFORD et al. v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES (a Municipal Corporation) et al., Respondents.
Roy A. Linn, Woodruff, Musick & Hartke, Walter W. Rennie and Harmel L. Pratt for Appellants.
Erwin P. Werner, City Attorney, and Frederick von Schrader, Deputy City Attorney, for Respondents.

Opinion:
THE COURT.
The facts and problems involved in this* case are set forth in the opinion in the case of Jones v. City of Los Angeles (L. A. No. 10654), ante, p. 304 [295 Pac. 14], this day filed. On the authority of that case the judgment is reversed.
Rehearing denied.
Seawell, J., Curtis, J., and Shenk, J., dissented.