Case Name: Cary BECKER, Respondent, v. Deborah NUELLE, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-11-14
Citations: 205 S.W.3d 324
Docket Number: No. ED 86654
Parties: Cary BECKER, Respondent, v. Deborah NUELLE, Appellant.
Judges: Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 205
Pages: 324–324

Head Matter:
Cary BECKER, Respondent, v. Deborah NUELLE, Appellant.
No. ED 86654.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Nov. 14, 2006.
James M. Martin, Heidi L. Leopold, Saint Louis, MO, for appellant.
Daniel M. Roddy, Saint Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Deborah Nuelle appeals the judgment ordering the sale of certain real property owned by her and her brother, Cary Becker, as joint tenants and the court's non-responsive denial of her request to be reimbursed for money she spent settling their deceased mother's estate. The judgment was supported by substantial evidence, and the court did not misstate or misapply the law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).