Case Name: James WILLIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-02-16
Citations: 986 S.W.2d 499
Docket Number: No. 74073
Parties: James WILLIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before PUDLOWSKI, P.J. and CRANDALL and AHRENS, J. J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 986
Pages: 499–499

Head Matter:
James WILLIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 74073.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Feb. 16, 1999.
Cheryl Carpenter, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Meghan J. Stephens, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before PUDLOWSKI, P.J. and CRANDALL and AHRENS, J. J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant James Willis appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).