Case Name: Marshall Van Winkle, complainant-respondent, v. Henry C. Steneck and George W. Steneck, defendants-appellants; John J. Fallon, Seaboard Trust Company and Fred A. Seide, defendants-respondents
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1937-04-30
Citations: 122 N.J. Eq. 220
Docket Number: 
Parties: Marshall Van Winkle, complainant-respondent, v. Henry C. Steneck and George W. Steneck, defendants-appellants; John J. Fallon, Seaboard Trust Company and Fred A. Seide, defendants-respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 122
Pages: 220–220

Head Matter:
Marshall Van Winkle, complainant-respondent, v. Henry C. Steneck and George W. Steneck, defendants-appellants; John J. Fallon, Seaboard Trust Company and Fred A. Seide, defendants-respondents.
f Argued February 8th, 1937.
Decided April 30th, 1937.]
Mr. Marshall A. Van Winkle, pro se, for the complainant-respondent.
Mr. L. Edward Herrmann, for the defendants-appellants.
Mr. J. Emil Walscheid, for the defendant-respondent John J. Fallon.
Messrs. Burke, Sheridan ■& Hourigan, for the defendant-respondent Seaboard Trust Company.
Messrs. Lichtenstein,. Schwartz «& Friedenberg, for the defendant-respondent Fred A. Seide.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We agree with the conclusions reached by the court below and the decree appealed from is affirmed.
For affirmance — Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Cole, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.