Case Name: FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Conservator for Bohemian Savings and Loan Association, Appellant, John V. CAPOZZI, Margaret A. Capozzi, Dan L. Wood, Vincent J. Bommarito, Thomas F. Cline, Daniel L. Dierdorf, Robert C. Fechner, Floyd L. Shearin, Jacob Fishman, and Gregory Saban, Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1989-06-20
Citations: 877 F.2d 727
Docket Number: No. 87-1696
Parties: FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Conservator for Bohemian Savings and Loan Association, Appellant, v. John V. CAPOZZI, Margaret A. Capozzi, Dan L. Wood, Vincent J. Bommarito, Thomas F. Cline, Daniel L. Dierdorf, Robert C. Fechner, Floyd L. Shearin, Jacob Fishman, and Gregory Saban, Appellees.
Judges: Before FAGG and WOLLMAN, Circuit Judges, and HENLEY, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 877
Pages: 727–727

Head Matter:
FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Conservator for Bohemian Savings and Loan Association, Appellant, v. John V. CAPOZZI, Margaret A. Capozzi, Dan L. Wood, Vincent J. Bommarito, Thomas F. Cline, Daniel L. Dierdorf, Robert C. Fechner, Floyd L. Shearin, Jacob Fishman, and Gregory Saban, Appellees.
No. 87-1696.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
June 20, 1989.
Before FAGG and WOLLMAN, Circuit Judges, and HENLEY, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
In our earlier decision in this case, we upheld the district court's dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction of claims brought by the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (the FSLIC) in its capacity as conservator for Bohemian Savings and Loan Association (Bohemian). See FSLIC v. Capozzi, 855 F.2d 1319, 1326 (8th Cir.1988), petition for cert. filed, 57 U.S.L.W. 3522 (U.S. Feb. 2, 1989) (No. 88-1300). The United States Supreme Court granted the petition for certiorari, vacated our judgment, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 2058, 104 L.Ed.2d 624 (1989), and remanded the case for further consideration in light of the Court's decision in FSLIC v. Ticktin, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 1626, 104 L.Ed.2d 73 (1989).
In Ticktin, the Supreme Court held federal subject matter jurisdiction exists for the type of lawsuit the FSLIC brings in this case. See id. 109 S.Ct. at 1627-29. Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the district court for further proceedings on the FSLIC's claims.