Case Name: Richard DEBUSK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WACHOVIA BANK NA, Defendant, and Guglielmo & Associates; Capital One Auto Finance, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-08-19
Citations: 291 F. App'x 55
Docket Number: No. 06-17344
Parties: Richard DEBUSK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WACHOVIA BANK NA, Defendant, and Guglielmo & Associates; Capital One Auto Finance, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 291
Pages: 55–56

Head Matter:
Richard DEBUSK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WACHOVIA BANK NA, Defendant, and Guglielmo & Associates; Capital One Auto Finance, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 06-17344.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 15, 2008.
Filed Aug. 19, 2008.
Gordon S. Bueler, Esquire, Bueler Jones LLP, Chandler, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Marshall Humphrey, III, Esquire, Humphrey Law Firm PC, Andrew J. Petersen, Esquire, Humphrey & Petersen, Tucson, AZ, Kevin D. Quigley, Esquire, Quarles & Brady, LLP, Phoenix, AZ, for DefendantsAppellees.
Before: O’SCANNLAIN and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges, and SINGLETON , Senior District Judge.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
The Honorable James K. Singleton, United States District Judge for the District of Alaska, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
In this action Richard W. DeBusk sued Capital One Auto Finance and others alleging violations of the Fair Credit Report ing Act. DeBusk moved for voluntary dismissal with prejudice of Capital One under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). Capital One moved for attorney's fees under 15 U.S.C. § 1681n(c) and Rule 41(a)(2). The district court granted the motion to dismiss and awarded Capital One $10,000 in attorney's fees. DeBusk appeals the award of attorney's fees. The remaining facts are known to the parties and will not be repeated.
We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not commit clear error in finding that DeBusk acted in bad faith in this action, nor was the award of attorney's fees to Capital One an abuse of discretion. See Guerrero v. RJM Acquisitions LLC, 499 F.3d 926, 933 (9th Cir.2007) (per curiam) (applying the analogous provision in the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692k(a)(3)).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.