Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Barbara CROSS, aka/Sealed 1, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-06-27
Citations: 14 F. App'x 788
Docket Number: No. 00-30285; D.C. No. CR-00-05181-JET
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Barbara CROSS, aka/Sealed 1, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 14
Pages: 788–789

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Barbara CROSS, aka/Sealed 1, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 00-30285.
D.C. No. CR-00-05181-JET.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted June 13, 2001.
Decided June 27, 2001.
Before B. FLETCHER, BRUNETTI, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Because Cross did not fully confess responsibility for her offense, the district court did not commit clear error when it determined that Cross was not entitled to a sentence adjustment for acceptance of responsibility pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1. Nor did the court err by failing to state the reasons underlying the sentence as required by 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c). The district court made a clear record when it adopted .the sentencing category set forth in the presentence report. United, States v. Upshaw, 918 F.2d 789, 792 (9th Cir. 1990).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.