Case Name: Michael A. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jerry HANEY; William S. Haines, Warden, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-07-08
Citations: 39 F. App'x 877
Docket Number: No. 02-6453
Parties: Michael A. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jerry HANEY; William S. Haines, Warden, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 39
Pages: 877–878

Head Matter:
Michael A. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jerry HANEY; William S. Haines, Warden, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 02-6453.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted June 17, 2002.
Decided July 8, 2002.
Michael A. Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Michael A. Williams appeals the district court's order denying relief without prejudice on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommen dation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Williams v. Haney, No. CA-01-74-2 (N.D.W.Va. Feb. 25, 2002). We deny Williams' motions requesting Rule 44 inquiries and to stay this case. Finally, we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.