Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald Lynn STEINDORF, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-08-03
Citations: 140 F. App'x 681
Docket Number: No. 04-30514; D.C. No. CR-04-00004-1-DWM
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Donald Lynn STEINDORF, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before O’SCANNLAIN, CALLAHAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 140
Pages: 681–682

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Donald Lynn STEINDORF, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 04-30514.
D.C. No. CR-04-00004-1-DWM.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 1, 2005.
Decided Aug. 3, 2005.
Marcia Good Hurd, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Billings, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Robin B. Hammond, Federal Defenders of Montana, Billings, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before O’SCANNLAIN, CALLAHAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Donald Lynn Steindorf appeals his 97-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to distribution of child pornography, possession of child pornography, and forfeiture, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(2), (a)(5)(B), and 2253.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Steindorf has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Steindorf has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.
We have conducted an independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988). We affirm the conviction. We vacate and remand the sentence for further proceedings consistent with United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 757, 769, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).
Counsel's motion to withdraw as counsel on appeal is DENIED.
The conviction is AFFIRMED, and the sentence is VACATED and REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.