Case Name: Orlando David ALMOND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James M. SISK, Manager, Intake & Legal Services, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-04-02
Citations: 372 F. App'x 432
Docket Number: No. 09-7564
Parties: Orlando David ALMOND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James M. SISK, Manager, Intake & Legal Services, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 372
Pages: 432–433

Head Matter:
Orlando David ALMOND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James M. SISK, Manager, Intake & Legal Services, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 09-7564.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 30, 2010.
Decided: April 2, 2010.
Orlando David Almond, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Bland Curwood, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Orlando David Almond appeals the magistrate judge's order dismissing as untimely filed Almond's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Almond v. Sisk, No. 3:08-cv-00138-MHL, 2009 WL 2424084 (E.D.Va. Aug. 6, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
The parties consented to the magistrate judge's jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2006).