Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Al-Lain Delont NORMAN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-09-30
Citations: 584 F. App'x 93
Docket Number: No. 14-7088
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Al-Lain Delont NORMAN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 584
Pages: 93–93

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Al-Lain Delont NORMAN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 14-7088.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 25, 2014.
Decided: Sept. 30, 2014.
Al-Lain Delont Norman, Appellant Pro Se. Damion J. Hansen, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Kevin Michael Comstock, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Al-Lain Delont Norman appeals the district court's order denying his motion to preserve his right to challenge his sentence under Alleyne v. United, States, — U.S.-, 133 S.Ct. 2151, 186 L.Ed.2d 314 (2013). Because Norman previously filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion, we conclude that the district court properly determined that it lacked the authority to grant his request. Norman must first obtain authorization from this court before raising a "second or successive" collateral attack on his sentence. 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h); United States v. Winestock, 340 F.3d 200, 205 (4th Cir.2003). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.