Case Name: In re: Ewin HENRIQUES, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-04-02
Citations: 372 F. App'x 436
Docket Number: No. 09-2374
Parties: In re: Ewin HENRIQUES, Petitioner.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 372
Pages: 436–437

Head Matter:
In re: Ewin HENRIQUES, Petitioner.
No. 09-2374.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 30, 2010.
Decided: April 2, 2010.
Ewin Henriques, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding-precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ewin Henriques petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion filed in his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2009) proceeding. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the docket sheet reveals that the district court denied the motion on January 15, 2010. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Henriques's case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We deny Henriques's motion for a certificate of appealability. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.