Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan MAGALLENES-GIL, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-05-19
Citations: 180 F. App'x 744
Docket Number: No. 05-50428
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan MAGALLENES-GIL, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: B. FLETCHER, TROTT and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 180
Pages: 744–744

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan MAGALLENES-GIL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-50428.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 15, 2006.
Filed May 19, 2006.
Carlos Arguello, USSD — Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Azra Feldman, Uniondale, NY, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: B. FLETCHER, TROTT and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Juan Magallenes-Gil appeals from his guilty plea conviction to importation of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 952 and 960. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Magallenes-Gil contends that the district court's failure during his guilty plea colloquy to ascertain whether he had been subjected to threats or promises and to recite the precise elements of the offense merit vacating his guilty plea. A review of the record demonstrates that MagallenesGil has not shown a "reasonable probability that, but for the error, he would not have entered the plea." See United States v. Dominguez Benitez, 542 U.S. 74, 83, 124 S.Ct. 2333, 159 L.Ed.2d 157 (2004). Accordingly, we affirm.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.