Case Name: Juan Sanchez VAZQUEZ; et al., Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-05-18
Citations: 180 F. App'x 719
Docket Number: No. 04-72826
Parties: Juan Sanchez VAZQUEZ; et al., Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: B. FLETCHER, TROTT, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 180
Pages: 719–719

Head Matter:
Juan Sanchez VAZQUEZ; et al., Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 04-72826.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 15, 2006.
Decided May 18, 2006.
Samuel U. Ogbu, Emeziem & Ogbu, LLP, Emeryville, CA, for Petitioners.
Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Stacy S. Paddack, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: B. FLETCHER, TROTT, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Juan Sanchez Vazquez and Obdulia Vazquez de Sanchez, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' decision affirming without opinion an immigration judge's denial of their applications for cancellation of removal. Because we lack jurisdiction, we dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to consider petitioners' challenge to the agency's discretionary determination that they failed to demonstrate exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to their qualifying relatives. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)®; Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir.2003); Montero-Martinez v. Ashcroft, 277 F.3d 1137, 1144 (9th Cir.2002).
Moreover, petitioners have failed to raise a colorable constitutional claim to invoke our jurisdiction over this petition for review. See Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft, 350 F.3d 845 (9th Cir.2003); Torres-Aguilar v. INS, 246 F.3d 1267, 1271 (9th Cir .2001).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.