Case Name: Isaac SANDERS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-10-23
Citations: 828 So. 2d 498
Docket Number: No. 3D02-780
Parties: Isaac SANDERS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and RAMIREZ, J„ and NESBITT, Senior Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 828
Pages: 498–499

Head Matter:
Isaac SANDERS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D02-780.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 23, 2002.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Marti Rothenberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Meredith L. Balo and Michael J. Neimand, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and RAMIREZ, J„ and NESBITT, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
No error has been demonstrated in the revocation of community control below and the ensuing judgment is therefore affirmed. However, we agree with both sides that the written order of probation should be amended to omit grounds which were not ox-ally indicated by the trial court, and that the seventeen-year sentence imposed on the defendant on the substantive charge under the 1993 guidelines must be reduced to the statutory maximum of fifteen-years. See Mays v. State, 717 So.2d 515, 517 (Fla.l998)("Prior to 1994 amendments, the sentencing guidelines required that all sentences imposed by trial court judges be 'within any relevant minimum and maximum sentence limitations provided by statute and must conform to all other statutory provisions.' "). The cause is remanded to accomplish these tasks. The defendant need not be present.
Affirmed as amended, remanded.