Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Javier PACHECO ESTRELLA, a/k/a Elias Jaime, a/k/a Jose Estrada Flores, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-09-18
Citations: 45 F. App'x 315
Docket Number: No. 02-6913
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Javier PACHECO ESTRELLA, a/k/a Elias Jaime, a/k/a Jose Estrada Flores, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 45
Pages: 315–316

Head Matter:
No. 02-6913.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Javier PACHECO ESTRELLA, a/k/a Elias Jaime, a/k/a Jose Estrada Flores, Defendant-Appellant.
Submitted Sept. 6, 2002.
Decided Sept. 18, 2002.
Javier Pacheco Estrella, Appellant Pro Se. David Jay Ignall, Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Javier Pacheco Estrella seeks to appeal from the denial of his motion to reconsider and the underlying motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and conclude that Pacheco Estrella has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
We note that our review is confined to the issues raised in Appellant's informal brief, see 4th Cir. R. 34(b), which in this case were directed at the issues raised initially on reconsideration rather than in the underlying § 2255 motion.