Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald Leland LANGDALE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-02-23
Citations: 4 F. App'x 501
Docket Number: No. 00-50207; D.C. No. CR-99-00757-AHM
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald Leland LANGDALE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before LEAVY, THOMAS, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 4
Pages: 501–501

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald Leland LANGDALE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 00-50207.
D.C. No. CR-99-00757-AHM.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 12, 2001.
Decided Feb. 23, 2001.
Before LEAVY, THOMAS, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Ronald Leland Langdale appeals his conviction and 37-month sentence for bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). His attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no issue for appeal.
Accordingly, we GRANT the motion to withdraw as counsel of record for appellant and the district court's judgment is
AFFIRMED.
. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.