Case Name: [The State ex rel.] Thomson, Appellant, v. Doneghy, Judge, et al., Appellees
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1997-11-05
Citations: 80 Ohio St. 3d 222
Docket Number: No. 97-999
Parties: [The State ex rel.] Thomson, Appellant, v. Doneghy, Judge, et al., Appellees.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Douglas, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 80
Pages: 222–223

Head Matter:
[The State ex rel.] Thomson, Appellant, v. Doneghy, Judge, et al., Appellees.
[Cite as State ex rel. Thomson v. Doneghy (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 222.]
(No. 97-999
Submitted September 9, 1997
Decided November 5, 1997.)
Michael E. Thomson, pro se.
Damian M. P. Rodgers, Lucas County Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellees.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals for the reasons stated in its opinion. State ex rel. Pennington v. Gundler (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 171, 661 N.E.2d 1049 (respondent's production of records renders moot claim for mandamus to compel such production). Further, Thomson had an adequate remedy to contend that he was entitled to an additional thirty days to perfect his appeal from Judge Doneghy's judgment by his pending appeal from that judgment. Cf. Atkinson v. Grumman Ohio Corp. (1988), 37 Ohio St.3d 80, 523 N.E.2d 851.
Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Resnick, J., not participating.