Case Name: Rosalee SCOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW YORK HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICE UNION, 1199/SEIU, AFL-CIO, Beth Israel Medical Center, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-10-04
Citations: 109 F. App'x 483
Docket Number: No. 03-7578-CV
Parties: Rosalee SCOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW YORK HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICE UNION, 1199/SEIU, AFL-CIO, Beth Israel Medical Center, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Present: VAN GRAAFEILAND, LEVAL, and KATZMANN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 109
Pages: 483–484

Head Matter:
Rosalee SCOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW YORK HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICE UNION, 1199/SEIU, AFL-CIO, Beth Israel Medical Center, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 03-7578-CV.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Oct. 4, 2004.
Rosalee Scott, New York, NY, for Appellant, pro se.
Richard Levy, Levy, Ratner, P.C., (Carl J. Levine), New York, NY, for New York Health and Human Services Union 1199/ SEIU, AFL-CIO, New York, NY, of counsel.
Rory J. McEvoy, Kirkpatrick & Lock-hart LLP, New York, NY, for Beth Israel Medical Center.
Present: VAN GRAAFEILAND, LEVAL, and KATZMANN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
SUMMARY ORDER
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.
Rosalee Scott, pro se, appeals from the order of the district court (Keenan, J. S.D.N.Y.), granting summary judgment to the defendants and dismissing Scott's complaint brought under the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, 29 U.S.C. § 185, against her former employer, Beth Israel Medical Center, and her former union, New York Health and Human Services Union 1199/SEIU, AFL-CIO.
Upon review, we conclude that the district court did not err. Moreover, we do not consider those claims which were not presented to the district court and are presented here for the first time. See Singleton v. Wulff, 428 U.S. 106, 120-21, 96 S.Ct. 2868, 49 L.Ed.2d 826 (1976); Thomas E. Hoar, Inc. v. Sara Lee Corp., 900 F.2d 522, 527 (2d Cir.1990).
For the reasons set forth, we AFFIRM the order of the District Court.