Case Name: In re Charles M. JAMES, III, Petitioner
Court: District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Decision Date: 2012-02-02
Citations: 36 A.3d 838
Docket Number: No. 11-BG-1387
Parties: In re Charles M. JAMES, III, Petitioner.
Judges: BEFORE: GLICKMAN and EASTERLY, Associate Judges, and FARRELL, Senior Judge.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 36
Pages: 838–839

Head Matter:
In re Charles M. JAMES, III, Petitioner.
No. 11-BG-1387.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Filed Feb. 2, 2012.
Bar Registration No. 486913, BDN: 359-11.
BEFORE: GLICKMAN and EASTERLY, Associate Judges, and FARRELL, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
On consideration of Bar Counsel's report regarding petitioner's petition for reinstatement, the petition for reinstatement, and it appearing that petitioner filed his D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit on March 22, 2006 and therefore is eligible to file the petition for reinstatement, it is
ORDERED that petitioner's petition for reinstatement is granted; however, reinstatement is subject to the following condition, which we add pursuant to our authority under D.C. Bar R. XI, § 16(f): petitioner must, prior to reentry into private practice in the District of Columbia, consult with the District of Columbia Bar's Practice Management Advisory Ser vice and establish a system to segregate client funds. Petitioner shall execute any necessary waivers of confidentiality required for Bar Counsel to obtain information on petitioner's compliance with this condition. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Charles M. James III, Esquire is hereby reinstated to the Bar of the District of Columbia subject to the condition outlined above. Failure to fully comply with the above condition may result in revocation of this reinstatement order. See D.C. Bar R. XI, § 16(f).