Case Name: Carl MULLINGS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1983-05-03
Citations: 431 So. 2d 224
Docket Number: No. 82-2042
Parties: Carl MULLINGS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 431
Pages: 224–225

Head Matter:
Carl MULLINGS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 82-2042.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 3, 1983.
Carl Mullings, in pro. per.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), having deferred ruling on a motion of the special assistant public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the special assistant public' defender's memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of this appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings, we conclude that the ap peal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the special assistant public defender's said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed. Lusk v. State, 367 So.2d 1088 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1979).