Case Name: Wesley Edward SMITH, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHARLESTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-08-25
Citations: 290 F. App'x 605
Docket Number: No. 08-1734
Parties: Wesley Edward SMITH, III, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. CHARLESTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 290
Pages: 605–606

Head Matter:
Wesley Edward SMITH, III, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. CHARLESTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 08-1734.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 21, 2008.
Decided: Aug. 25, 2008.
Wesley Edward Smith, III, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Francis Blanchard, III, Alice F. Paylor, Rosen, Rosen & Hagood, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Ap-pellee.
Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Wesley Edward Smith, III, appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reconsideration as untimely. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Charleston County School District, No. 2:06-cv-02177-DCN (D.S.C. May 8, 2008). We deny Smith's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis as moot, as in forma pauperis status has already been granted. We also deny Smith's motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.