Case Name: In the Interest of A.A., a minor. In the Interest of D.A., a minor. Juvenile Officer of Franklin County, Missouri, Petitioner/Respondent, v. D.A., Respondent/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-11-05
Citations: 90 S.W.3d 509
Docket Number: Nos. ED 80925, ED 80926
Parties: In the Interest of A.A., a minor. In the Interest of D.A., a minor. Juvenile Officer of Franklin County, Missouri, Petitioner/Respondent, v. D.A., Respondent/Appellant.
Judges: Before PAUL J. SIMON, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., J. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 90
Pages: 509–509

Head Matter:
In the Interest of A.A., a minor. In the Interest of D.A., a minor. Juvenile Officer of Franklin County, Missouri, Petitioner/Respondent, v. D.A., Respondent/Appellant.
Nos. ED 80925, ED 80926.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Nov. 5, 2002.
Daniel E. Leslie, Joseph Aubuchon, Union, MO, for appellant.
Gordon Rolla Upchurch, Baylard, Bill-ington & Dempsey, P.C., Union, MO, for respondent.
John Robert O’Connor, Union, MO, Guardian Ad Litem.
Before PAUL J. SIMON, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., J. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Mother appeals from the judgment of the trial court terminating her parental rights to two children. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).