Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Michael Lynn COATES, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-08-06
Citations: 286 F. App'x 189
Docket Number: No. 08-10194
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Michael Lynn COATES, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 286
Pages: 189–190

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Michael Lynn COATES, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-10194
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 6, 2008.
Jeffrey Robert Haag, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Lubbock, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Helen Miller Liggett, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Lubbock, TX, for Defendanb-Appellant.
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, STEWART, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Michael Lynn Coates raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Hinson, 429 F.3d 114, 119 (5th Cir. 2005), which held that a defendant is not entitled to a jury trial to determine whether the terms of supervised release have been violated. The Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.