Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio CUEVAS-RODRIGUEZ, a.k.a. Antonio Garcia-Rodriguez, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-07-16
Citations: 235 F. App'x 421
Docket Number: No. 06-30260
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Antonio CUEVAS-RODRIGUEZ, a.k.a. Antonio Garcia-Rodriguez, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: LEAVY, THOMAS, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 235
Pages: 421–422

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Antonio CUEVAS-RODRIGUEZ, a.k.a. Antonio Garcia-Rodriguez, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 06-30260.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 9, 2007 .
Filed July 16, 2007.
Rafael M. Gonzalez, Jr., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Boise, ID, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Thomas M. Monaghan, Esq., Federal Defenders of Eastern Washington & Idaho, Boise, ID, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: LEAVY, THOMAS, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Antonio Cuevas-Rodriguez appeals from his 57-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal re-entry into the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).
Assuming arguendo that Cuevas-Rodriguez's appeal waiver was invalidated by the district court's oral pronouncements, we conclude that the district court properly considered the advisory Sentencing Guidelines and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors in imposing the sentence. See United States v. Ploujfe, 445 F.3d 1126, 1131 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 2314, 164 L.Ed.2d 832 (2006).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.