Case Name: State of Missouri, ex rel. Washington University, v. Public Service Commission of Missouri and Union Electric Light & Power Company; Same v. Same; State of Missouri, ex rel. St. Louis Brewing Association, v. Same; Same v. Same; State of Missouri, ex rel. Wainwright Real Estate Company, v. Same; Same v. Same; and State of Missouri, ex rel. Hotel Statler Company, Inc., v. Same
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1927-10-24
Citations: 275 U.S. 489
Docket Number: No. 21; No. 22; No. 23; No. 24; No. 25; No. 26; No. 27
Parties: State of Missouri, ex rel. Washington University, v. Public Service Commission of Missouri and Union Electric Light & Power Company; Same v. Same; State of Missouri, ex rel. St. Louis Brewing Association, v. Same; Same v. Same; State of Missouri, ex rel. Wainwright Real Estate Company, v. Same; Same v. Same; and State of Missouri, ex rel. Hotel Statler Company, Inc., v. Same.
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 275
Pages: 489–490

Head Matter:
No. 21.
No. 22.
No. 23.
No. 24.
No. 25.
No. 26.
No. 27.
State of Missouri, ex rel. Washington University, v. Public Service Commission of Missouri and Union Electric Light & Power Company; Same v. Same; State of Missouri, ex rel. St. Louis Brewing Association, v. Same; Same v. Same; State of Missouri, ex rel. Wainwright Real Estate Company, v. Same; Same v. Same; and State of Missouri, ex rel. Hotel Statler Company, Inc., v. Same.
Argued October 14, 1927.
Decided October 24, 1927.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The writs of error aré dismissed on the authority of § 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937), .for lack of jurisdiction. Treating the writs of error as applications for certiorari, the applications are denied for want of a-substantial federal question on the authority of Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147.
Messrs. Charles M. Polk, Marion C, Early and Charles Nagel for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Theodore Rassieur, with whom Messrs. J. P. Painter and Jerry A. Matthews were on the brief, for defendants in error.