Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. EDGAR FILADELFO HERNANDEZ, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2004-08-04
Citations: 194 Or. App. 490
Docket Number: C021103CR; A120054
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. EDGAR FILADELFO HERNANDEZ, Appellant.
Judges: Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Linder and Ortega, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 194
Pages: 490–491

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted June 10,
convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing August 4, 2004
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. EDGAR FILADELFO HERNANDEZ, Appellant.
C021103CR; A120054
95 P3d 732
David J. Celuch argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.
Jill Smith, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.
Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Linder and Ortega, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant appeals his convictions and sentences on multiple counts of robbery and kidnapping, as well as unauthorized use of a vehicle. The trial court imposed gun minimum sentences pursuant to ORS 161.610 on the robbery convictions. Defendant contends that no evidence in the record supports a conclusion that he personally used or threatened to use a firearm in the commission of those offenses. The state agrees and concedes error. We accept that concession. See State v. Thiehoff, 169 Or App 630, 635-36, 10 P3d 322 (2000), rev den, 332 Or 137 (2001) ("if a minimum sentence is to be imposed pursuant to ORS 161.610, the finder of fact must first determine that the defendant personally used or threatened to use a firearm"). We reject without discussion defendant's remaining assignments of error.
Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing.