Case Name: Dustin C. WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lieutenant TINCHER; Sergeant Lundy; Warden Wright; Grievance Counselor Walls; Nurse Payne, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-07-22
Citations: 654 F. App'x 636
Docket Number: No. 16-6559
Parties: Dustin C. WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lieutenant TINCHER; Sergeant Lundy; Warden Wright; Grievance Counselor Walls; Nurse Payne, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 654
Pages: 636–637

Head Matter:
Dustin C. WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lieutenant TINCHER; Sergeant Lundy; Warden Wright; Grievance Counselor Walls; Nurse Payne, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-6559
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 21, 2016
Decided: July 22, 2016
Dustin Chase Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Hull Davidson, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Rosalie Fes-sier, TIMBERLAKE, SMITH, THOMAS & MOSES, PC, Staunton, Virginia, for Ap-pellees.
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Dustin C. Wilson seeks to appeal the district court's order granting one defendant's motion to dismiss and granting in part and denying in part' the remaining defendants' motion for summary judgment. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Wilson seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Robinson v. Parke-Davis & Co., 685 F.2d 912, 913 (4th Cir. 1982). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED