Case Name: Robert S. WOLFF, Edward Turner, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CASH 4 TITLES, d.b.a. Charles Richard Homa, et al., Defendants, Linda Wilson, World Express International, LLC, Interested-Parties-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-06-14
Citations: 135 F. App'x 329
Docket Number: No. 04-11839; D.C. Docket No. 00-00542 CV-PCH
Parties: Robert S. WOLFF, Edward Turner, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CASH 4 TITLES, d.b.a. Charles Richard Homa, et al., Defendants, Linda Wilson, World Express International, LLC, Interested-Parties-Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 135
Pages: 329–329

Head Matter:
Robert S. WOLFF, Edward Turner, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CASH 4 TITLES, d.b.a. Charles Richard Homa, et al., Defendants, Linda Wilson, World Express International, LLC, Interested-Parties-Appellants.
No. 04-11839.
D.C. Docket No. 00-00542 CV-PCH.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
June 14, 2005.
Lawrence Allan Kellogg, Rhett Traband, Tew, Cardenas, et. al., Barton Stuart Sacher, Nancy J. Van Sant, Sacher, Zelman, Van Sant, et al. P.A., Miami, FL, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.
William J. Sheppard, William J. Sheppard, D. Gray Thomas, Sheppard, White & Thomas, P.A., Jacksonville, FL, for Interested-Parties-Appellants.
Before DUB INA and WILSON, Circuit Judges, and LAWSON, District Judge.
Honorable Hugh Lawson, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Georgia, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See 11th Cir. R. 36-1.
. 11th Cir. R. 36-1 provides:
When the court determines that any of the following circumstances exist:
(a) the judgment of the district court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous;
(b) the evidence in support of a jury verdict is sufficient;
(c) the order of an administrative agency is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole;
(d) summary judgment, directed verdict, or judgment on the pleadings is supported by the record;
(e) the judgment has been entered without a reversible error of law; and an opinion would have no precedential value, the judgment or order may be affirmed or enforced without opinion.