Case Name: A. J. CHAVAS, doing business under the firm name and style of Chavas Electric Company, Plaintiff-Appellee and Cross-Appellant, v. Dwain ESPER, doing business under the firm name and style of N.J.W. Corporation and under the firm name and style of Gayety Theatre, and doing business under the firm name and style of Dwain Esper and Hildegard Esper, Defendant-Appellant and Cross-Appellee
Court: Supreme Court of New Mexico
Jurisdiction: New Mexico
Decision Date: 1966-08-29
Citations: 76 N.M. 666
Docket Number: No. 7821
Parties: A. J. CHAVAS, doing business under the firm name and style of Chavas Electric Company, Plaintiff-Appellee and Cross-Appellant, v. Dwain ESPER, doing business under the firm name and style of N.J.W. Corporation and under the firm name and style of Gayety Theatre, and doing business under the firm name and style of Dwain Esper and Hildegard Esper, Defendant-Appellant and Cross-Appellee.
Judges: CHAVEZ and MOISE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: New Mexico Reports
Volume: 76
Pages: 666–667

Head Matter:
417 P.2d 802
A. J. CHAVAS, doing business under the firm name and style of Chavas Electric Company, Plaintiff-Appellee and Cross-Appellant, v. Dwain ESPER, doing business under the firm name and style of N.J.W. Corporation and under the firm name and style of Gayety Theatre, and doing business under the firm name and style of Dwain Esper and Hildegard Esper, Defendant-Appellant and Cross-Appellee.
No. 7821.
Supreme Court of New Mexico.
Aug. 29, 1966.
H. R. Blackhurst, Albuquerqrte, for appellant.
John C. O’Brien, Albuquerque, for ap-pellee.

Opinion:
OPINION
CARMODY, Chief Justice.
Defendant appeals from a'jury verdict' in a dispute between the parties over a' contract for the payment for electrical work.
Plaintiff, an individual engaged in electrical contracting, contends that ' defendant contracted with him to do various' electrical work on the premises of defendant's theater. However, it was admitted by plaintiff at oral argument that he possessed only an electrical contractor's license, and not a contractor's license as required by the Contractors' License -Law, § 67-16-1 through 67-16-20, N.M.S.A! 1953.
This case is controlled by Martinez v. Research Park, Inc., 1965, 75 N.M. 672, 410 P.2d 200. Having an electrical contractor's license does not exempt plaintiff from the requirements of the Contractors' License Law. The action-is barred under. § 67-16-14, N.M.S.A. 1953, because of the lack of a contractor's license.
The judgment is reversed with directions to the district court to set aside its judgment and dismiss the complaint.
It is so ordered.
CHAVEZ and MOISE, JJ., concur.