Case Name: MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CO., OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BROWN, et al, Appellant
Court: South Dakota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: South Dakota
Decision Date: 1937-11-02
Citations: 65 S.D. 540
Docket Number: File No. 8052
Parties: MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CO., OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BROWN, et al, Appellant.
Judges: All the Judges concur.
Reporter: South Dakota Reports
Volume: 65
Pages: 540–541

Head Matter:
MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CO., OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BROWN, et al, Appellant.
(275 N. W. 505)
(File No. 8052.
Opinion filed November 2, 1937)
Ativater & Helm, of Sturgis, for Appellant.
H. F. Fellows, of Rapid City, and Lynn Milne, of Sturgis, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The only question presented by the record in this case is the sufficiency of the evidence to- sustain the finding of the trial court that a certain signature appearing upon an application for change of beneficiary named in an insurance- policy was a valid signature, and.not a forgery. After a consideration of the record, we are'convinced that the evidence is amply sufficient to sustain the findings of the trial court. To detail the evidence would serve no useful purpose.
The judgment and o-rder appealed fro-m are affirmed.
All the Judges concur.