Case Name: ROOSEVELT BRIAN MOORE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. M.D. BITER, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-02-12
Citations: 742 F.3d 917
Docket Number: No. 11-56846
Parties: ROOSEVELT BRIAN MOORE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. M.D. BITER, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before: HARRY PREGERSON, WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, and JACQUELINE H. NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 742
Pages: 917–922

Head Matter:
ROOSEVELT BRIAN MOORE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. M.D. BITER, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 11-56846.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Feb. 12, 2014.
Patricia Ann Young, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.
Roosevelt Brian Moore, pro se.
Mary Sanchez, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Xiomara Costello, Office of the California Attorney General, Los AN-GELES, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.
Before: HARRY PREGERSON, WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, and JACQUELINE H. NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
The panel has voted to deny the petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc.
The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
The petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc are DENIED. No further petitions will be entertained.
Judge O'Scannlain's dissent from denial of rehearing en banc is filed concurrently with this Order.