Case Name: James E. GRAYES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1982-12-03
Citations: 422 So. 2d 1071
Docket Number: No. 82-839
Parties: James E. GRAYES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: HOBSON, A.C.J., and GRIMES and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 422
Pages: 1071–1071

Head Matter:
James E. GRAYES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 82-839.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Dec. 3, 1982.
Jerry Hill, Public Defender, and L.S. Al-perstein, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert J. Landry, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Upon review of the record, we find that the affidavit supporting the search warrant was insufficient. Although the affidavit stated the time at which the informant met with and spoke to the affiant, it did not specify the time at which the informant observed the illegal act, appellant's possession of cocaine. The affidavit in this case duplicates the one in King v. State, 410 So.2d 586 (Fla.2d DCA 1982). Therefore, the trial court having erred in denying appellant's motion to suppress the evidence pursuant to the invalid search warrant, the judgment and sentence herein are REVERSED and the cause REMANDED for further proceedings.
HOBSON, A.C.J., and GRIMES and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.