Case Name: WILSON v. ROBINSON et al.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1926-12-20
Citations: 16 F.2d 432
Docket Number: No. 4743
Parties: WILSON v. ROBINSON et al. *
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 16
Pages: 432–432

Head Matter:
WILSON v. ROBINSON et al. *
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
December 20, 1926.)
No. 4743.
F. C. Reagan and Edwin H. Flick, both of Seattle, Wash., for appellant.
Wesley Lloyd, of Tacoma, Wash., and George Dysart and C. D..Cunningham, both of Centraba, Wash., for appellees. !-
Before RUDKIN, Circuit Judge, and DIETRICH and KERRIGAN, District Judges.'

Opinion:
DIETRICH, District Judge.
In its legal aspect this ease is identical with No. 4742, Katie Roberts Wilson v. Margaret Jane Robinson et al., 16 F.(2d) 431, this day decided, and for the reasons assigned in that case the decree is affirmed, as there modified.
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge, dissents, for the reason stated in Wilson v. Robinson, supra.