Case Name: COSTA CROCIERE, S.P.A., Prestige Cruises N.V., Cruise Ships Catering and Services, International N.V., Costa Cruise Lines N.V., L.L.C., Costa Cruise Lines, Inc., and Carnival Corporation d/b/a Carnival Cruise Lines, Appellants, v. Ricardo ESCOBAR, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2005-07-27
Citations: 934 So. 2d 510
Docket Number: No. 3D04-1016
Parties: COSTA CROCIERE, S.P.A., Prestige Cruises N.V., Cruise Ships Catering and Services, International N.V., Costa Cruise Lines N.V., L.L.C., Costa Cruise Lines, Inc., and Carnival Corporation d/b/a Carnival Cruise Lines, Appellants, v. Ricardo ESCOBAR, Appellee.
Judges: Before GREEN, SHEPHERD, and C0RTIÑAS, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 934
Pages: 510–511

Head Matter:
COSTA CROCIERE, S.P.A., Prestige Cruises N.V., Cruise Ships Catering and Services, International N.V., Costa Cruise Lines N.V., L.L.C., Costa Cruise Lines, Inc., and Carnival Corporation d/b/a Carnival Cruise Lines, Appellants, v. Ricardo ESCOBAR, Appellee.
No. 3D04-1016.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 27, 2005.
McAlpin & Brais, P.A., Miami, and Richard J. McAlpin, and Barbara J. Conner, Fort Myers; Robert S. Glazier, Miami, for appellants.
Rebecca B. Watford, Miami, for appel-lee.
Before GREEN, SHEPHERD, and C0RTIÑAS, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.061(g); Wedge Hotel Mgmt., (Bahamas), Ltd. v. Meier, 868 So.2d 552, 552 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)('Wedge's motion to dismiss for forum non conveniens was not filed until May 6, 2002, well past the sixty day time limit of 1.061(g). As Wedge's motion was untimely under the plain language of 1.061(g), we need not address the merits of the arguments raised in the motion.").