Case Name: ANTHONY LAURA, APPELLANT, v. LOUIS PUNCERELLI AND THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HUDSON COUNTY, RESPONDENTS
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1918-10-11
Citations: 92 N.J.L. 518
Docket Number: 
Parties: ANTHONY LAURA, APPELLANT, v. LOUIS PUNCERELLI AND THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HUDSON COUNTY, RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 92
Pages: 518–518

Head Matter:
ANTHONY LAURA, APPELLANT, v. LOUIS PUNCERELLI AND THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HUDSON COUNTY, RESPONDENTS.
Submitted July 8, 1918
Decided October 11, 1918.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 91 N. J. L. 38.
For the appellant, De Graw & Murray.
For the respondents, John H. Platoff and Francis H. McCauley.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Swayze in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, sJJ. 11.
For reversal — White, J. 1.