Case Name: Aloysius Roberts, Appellant, v. Bertha Roberts, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1956-11-13
Citations: 2 A.D.2d 883
Docket Number: 
Parties: Aloysius Roberts, Appellant, v. Bertha Roberts, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 2
Pages: 883–883

Head Matter:
Aloysius Roberts, Appellant, v. Bertha Roberts, Respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment, so far as appealed from, and the order denying plaintiff's motion to eliminate the provision for payment of alimony to defendant, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Upon the evidence adduced in this annulment action, in which plaintiff obtained judgment on the ground of a prior subsisting marriage by defendant, it cannot be said that the allowance of alimony to defendant, pursuant to the provisions of section 1140-a of the Civil Practice Act, did not constitute a valid exercise of discretion. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Botein, Rabin, Prank and Yalente, JJ.