Case Name: Montez THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2018-11-06
Citations: 559 S.W.3d 930
Docket Number: No. ED 106539
Parties: Montez THOMAS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Colleen Dolan, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 559
Pages: 930–931

Head Matter:
Montez THOMAS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 106539
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
Filed: November 6, 2018
Lisa M. Stroup, 1010 Market St. Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Movant/Appellant.
Julia E. Neidhardt, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Defendant/Respondent.
Before Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Colleen Dolan, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Montez Thomas ("Movant") appeals the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing and finding that Movant failed to demonstrate that his plea counsel was ineffective. Finding that Movant has failed to demonstrate that the motion court clearly erred in denying his Rule 24.035 motion, we affirm the judgment of the motion court.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).