Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jeffrey JEFFERSON, Appellant; Jeffrey JEFFERSON, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-10-10
Citations: 907 S.W.2d 381
Docket Number: Nos. 66472, 68046
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jeffrey JEFFERSON, Appellant. Jeffrey JEFFERSON, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and WHITE, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 907
Pages: 381–382

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jeffrey JEFFERSON, Appellant. Jeffrey JEFFERSON, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 66472, 68046.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Oct. 10, 1995.
Emmett D. Queener, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Joanne E. Beal, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and WHITE, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Jeffrey Jefferson appeals convictions of Assault First Degree, in violation of § 565.050 RSMo 1994, and Armed Criminal Action, in violation of § 571.015 RSMo 1994, and denial of his untimely Rule 29.15 motion for post conviction relief. We find no Batson error, based on gender and no error in denying a request for mistrial. Dismissal of Rule 29.15 motion as untimely is required by Day v. State, 770 S.W.2d 692, 696 (Mo. banc 1989). An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential value. Judgments affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b) and Rule 84.16(b).