Case Name: Michael A. Leo et al., Respondents, v. F.L. Heughes & Co., Inc., Appellant, and Artco Contracting, Inc., et al., Respondents; Artco Contracting, Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Niagara Erecting, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant; F.L. Heughes & Co., Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Niagara Erecting, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1999-11-12
Citations: 266 A.D.2d 809
Docket Number: Appeal No. 2
Parties: Michael A. Leo et al., Respondents, v F.L. Heughes & Co., Inc., Appellant, and Artco Contracting, Inc., et al., Respondents. Artco Contracting, Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v Niagara Erecting, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant. F.L. Heughes & Co., Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v Niagara Erecting, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 266
Pages: 809–809

Head Matter:
Michael A. Leo et al., Respondents, v F.L. Heughes & Co., Inc., Appellant, and Artco Contracting, Inc., et al., Respondents. Artco Contracting, Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v Niagara Erecting, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant. F.L. Heughes & Co., Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v Niagara Erecting, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.
(Appeal No. 2.)
[698 NYS2d 192]

Opinion:
—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the same Memorandum as in Leo v Artco Contr. (266 AD2d 808 [decided herewith]). (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Joslin, J.— Summary Judgment.) Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Scudder and Balio, JJ.