Case Name: Jerome HALLORAN, Appellant, v. Rachid AOUCHICHE, M.D., F.A.C.S., and Rachid Aouchiche, M.D., F.A.C.S., d/b/a West Coast Eye Care Center, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2003-09-19
Citations: 870 So. 2d 41
Docket Number: No. 2D02-2119
Parties: Jerome HALLORAN, Appellant, v. Rachid AOUCHICHE, M.D., F.A.C.S., and Rachid Aouchiche, M.D., F.A.C.S., d/b/a West Coast Eye Care Center, Appellees.
Judges: COVINGTON and CANADY, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 870
Pages: 41–42

Head Matter:
Jerome HALLORAN, Appellant, v. Rachid AOUCHICHE, M.D., F.A.C.S., and Rachid Aouchiche, M.D., F.A.C.S., d/b/a West Coast Eye Care Center, Appellees.
No. 2D02-2119.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Sept. 19, 2003.
Jerome Halloran, pro se.
Lewis A. Berns of Peterson, Bernard, Vandenberg, Zei, Geisler & Martin, Fort Lauderdale, for Appellee.

Opinion:
NORTHCUTT, Judge.
Jerome Halloran, pro se, appeals the trial court's order dismissing with prejudice his complaint against Rachid Aouc-hiche, M.D., and Rachid Aouchiche, M.D., d/b/a West Coast Eye Care Center (collectively "Dr. Aouchiche"). We affirm the order under review.
In February 2001, Mr. Halloran filed a complaint against Dr. Aouchiche, alleging medical malpractice, fraud, and intentional infliction of emotional distress relating to surgical laser treatment he received in 1994 to relieve pressure in his eye. Dr. Aouchiche moved to dismiss the complaint on grounds that no presuit investigation was done and the statute of limitations had expired.
Pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a), we have reviewed the record and the initial brief filed by Mr. Halloran and find that no preliminary basis for reversal has been demonstrated. Therefore, we summarily affirm the trial court's order dismissing the complaint with prejudice.
Affirmed.
COVINGTON and CANADY, JJ., Concur.