Case Name: Herbert HAYES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BURTON & SUE, L.L.P.; Gary K. Sue; Teague, Rotenstreich, Stanaland, Fox & Holt; Jeremy A. Kosin, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-05-02
Citations: 426 F. App'x 190
Docket Number: No. 10-2051
Parties: Herbert HAYES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BURTON & SUE, L.L.P.; Gary K. Sue; Teague, Rotenstreich, Stanaland, Fox & Holt; Jeremy A. Kosin, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 426
Pages: 190–190

Head Matter:
Herbert HAYES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BURTON & SUE, L.L.P.; Gary K. Sue; Teague, Rotenstreich, Stanaland, Fox & Holt; Jeremy A. Kosin, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 10-2051.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 28, 2011.
Decided: May 2, 2011.
Herbert Hayes, Appellant Pro Se. Walter K. Burton, Burton & Sue, LLP, Greensboro, North Carolina; Paul Anthony Daniels, Teague, Rotenstx'eich, Stanaland, Fox & Holt, LLP, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Herbert Hayes appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hayes v. Burton & Sue, LLP, No. 1:09-cv-00391-NCT-PTS (M.D.N.C. Sept. 1, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately px'esented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.