Case Name: Alvin M. SANDLER and Martin L. Sandler, a co-partnership d/b/a Sandler and Sandler, Appellants, v. PRIVATE LABEL COSMETICS CO., Inc., a New York corporation, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1968-12-03
Citations: 216 So. 2d 37
Docket Number: No. 68-513
Parties: Alvin M. SANDLER and Martin L. Sandler, a co-partnership d/b/a Sandler and Sandler, Appellants, v. PRIVATE LABEL COSMETICS CO., Inc., a New York corporation, Appellee.
Judges: Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and BARKDULL and HENDRY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 216
Pages: 37–37

Head Matter:
Alvin M. SANDLER and Martin L. Sandler, a co-partnership d/b/a Sandler and Sandler, Appellants, v. PRIVATE LABEL COSMETICS CO., Inc., a New York corporation, Appellee.
No. 68-513.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
Dec. 3, 1968.
Knight, Underwood, Peters, Hoeveler & Pickle, R. M. MacArthur, Miami, for appellants.
Albert J. Zemlock, Miami, for appellee.
Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and BARKDULL and HENDRY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal by the defendants from a summary final judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff. Appellants contend that the trial judge erred in entering the judgment appealed because there were issues of fact that should have been submitted to a jury rather than disposed of as a matter of law by summary judgment. We find merit in appellants' contention. Visingardi v. Tirone, Fla.1967, 193 So.2d 601; Holl v. Talcott, Fla.1966, 191 So.2d 40.
Accordingly the judgment appealed is reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
Reversed and remanded.