Case Name: Charlotte M. Hamill, Appellant, v. City of New York, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1981-02-26
Citations: 52 N.Y.2d 1045
Docket Number: 
Parties: Charlotte M. Hamill, Appellant, v City of New York, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 52
Pages: 1045–1046

Head Matter:
Charlotte M. Hamill, Appellant, v City of New York, Respondent.
Decided February 26, 1981
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Siff & Newman, P. C., for appellant.
Allen G. Schwartz, Corporation Counsel (JoanE. Handler of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On summary consideration, order affirmed, without costs. The Appellate Division correctly concluded that there was insufficient evidence of negligence to present a jury question, as a matter of law.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.