Case Name: J. Rodney HORN, Appellant, v. HAVERFIELD CORPORATION, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-10-01
Citations: 585 So. 2d 1203
Docket Number: No. 91-1280
Parties: J. Rodney HORN, Appellant, v. HAVERFIELD CORPORATION, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 585
Pages: 1203–1203

Head Matter:
J. Rodney HORN, Appellant, v. HAVERFIELD CORPORATION, Appellee.
No. 91-1280.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 1, 1991.
Colson Hicks Eidson Colson & Matthews and Joe Matthews, Miami, for appellant.
Anderson Moss Parks Meyers & Sher-ouse and Gary S. Koenigsberg, for appel-lee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from an injunctive order enforcing a restrictive covenant. We need not determine whether the amendment to § 542.33(2)(a) should be applied in the enforcement of a contract entered into before its effective date or whether we should follow the majority or the dissenting opinion in Hapney v. Central Garage, Inc., 579 So.2d 127 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991), because, on any standard, there is no error or abuse of discretion.
Affirmed.