Case Name: The State of Ohio [City of Akron], Appellant, v. Thomas, Appellee
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1979-03-21
Citations: 57 Ohio St. 2d 71
Docket Number: No. 78-1367
Parties: The State of Ohio [City of Akron], Appellant, v. Thomas, Appellee.
Judges: Celebrezze, C. J., Herbert, Keefe, P. Brown, Sweeney, Potter and Holmes, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Second Series
Volume: 57
Pages: 71–72

Head Matter:
The State of Ohio [City of Akron], Appellant, v. Thomas, Appellee.
[Cite as State v. Thomas (1979), 57 Ohio St. 2d 71.]
(No. 78-1367
Decided March 21, 1979.)
Mr. Lynn C. Slaby, for appellant.
Vasko, Howard $ Morris Co., L. P. A., and Mr. William E. Howard, for appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed on authority of and for the reasons stated in State v. Burgum, (1978), 56 Ohio St. 2d 354, wherein this court held, in- paragraph one of the syllabus, that "R. C. 2907.-01(F), which .'sets forth the definition of 'obscenity/ is neither unconstitutionally overbroád nor void for vagueness when it is authoritatively construed to incorporate the guidelines prescribed in Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15."
Judgment reversed.
Celebrezze, C. J., Herbert, Keefe, P. Brown, Sweeney, Potter and Holmes, JJ., concur.
Keefe, J., of the First Appellate District, sitting for W. Brown, J.
Potter, J., of the Sixth Appellate District, sitting for Locher, J.