Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenneth Bruce KROHN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-07-29
Citations: 389 F. App'x 308
Docket Number: No. 08-7475
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenneth Bruce KROHN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 389
Pages: 308–308

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenneth Bruce KROHN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-7475.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 30, 2010.
Decided: July 29, 2010.
Kenneth Bruce Krohn, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Walters, Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER OURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kenneth i3ruce I~rohn appeals the clis-trict court's orders denying his petition for writ of error coram nobis and denying his subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Krohn, No. 1:77-cr-00162-LO-1 (E.D. Va. filed & entered Apr. 7, 2008; filed June 9, 2008 & entered June 10, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED