Case Name: Richard HUNT, Appellant, v. SUMNER GROUP, INC., Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2018-02-27
Citations: 541 S.W.3d 13
Docket Number: ED 105692
Parties: Richard HUNT, Appellant,
v.
SUMNER GROUP, INC., Respondent.
Judges: Before Lisa P. Page, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 541
Pages: 13–14

Head Matter:
Richard HUNT, Appellant,
v.
SUMNER GROUP, INC., Respondent.
ED 105692
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Filed: February 27, 2018
James V. O'Brien, Andrew S. Buchanan, Buchanan & Williams, P.C. Public Defender, 7908 Bonhomme Ave., Ste. 200, Clayton, MO 63105, for Appellant.
John J. Gazzoli, Jr., Theresa A. Phelps, Jessica C. Gittemeier, Rosenblum Goldenhersh, P.C., 7733 Forsyth Blvd., Ste. 400, St. Louis, MO 63105, for Respondent.
Before Lisa P. Page, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Richard Hunt ("Hunt") appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Sumner Group, Inc. ("Sumner") on his petition for workers' compensation retaliation pursuant to Section 287.780 RSMo (2000). Each of Hunt's points on appeal contend the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of Sumner because there was sufficient evidence in the record to create a genuine issue of material fact. We affirm.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).