Case Name: David BACH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-03-19
Citations: 318 F. App'x 220
Docket Number: No. 08-2299
Parties: David BACH, Petitioner—Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent—Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 318
Pages: 220–221

Head Matter:
David BACH, Petitioner—Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent—Appellee.
No. 08-2299.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 17, 2009.
Decided: March 19, 2009.
David Bach, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas J. Clark, Kenneth W. Rosenberg, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.; Nathan J. Hochman, Assistant Attorney General, Washington, D.C.; Donald L. Korb, Internal Revenue Service, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
David Bach appeals from the tax court's orders upholding the Commissioner's deficiency determination and proposed collection activities with respect to his tax liability for the 1993 tax year, and denying his motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. See Bach v. Comm'r, IRS, Tax Ct. No. 06-23061-L (U.S.T.C. Sept. 2, 2008; filed Sept. 10, 2008 & entered Sept. 11, 2008; filed Sept. 17, 2008 & entered Sept. 22, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately-presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.