Case Name: Pamela Jean ANDERSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Patricia L. Huffman, Warden, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-09-05
Citations: 46 F. App'x 153
Docket Number: No. 02-6652
Parties: Pamela Jean ANDERSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Patricia L. Huffman, Warden, Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 46
Pages: 153–154

Head Matter:
Pamela Jean ANDERSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Patricia L. Huffman, Warden, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 02-6652.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 20, 2002.
Decided Sept. 5, 2002.
Pamela Jean Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Garrett Hill, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Pamela J. Anderson appeals the district court's order denying relief on her petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2002). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Anderson v. Department of Corrections, No. CA-01-497-7 (W.D.Va. Mar. 12, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.