Case Name: EDISON FIXTURE COMPANY, INCORPORATED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. LOUIS LAZAR, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1925-05-19
Citations: 3 N.J. Misc. 551
Docket Number: 
Parties: EDISON FIXTURE COMPANY, INCORPORATED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. LOUIS LAZAR, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 3
Pages: 551–552

Head Matter:
EDISON FIXTURE COMPANY, INCORPORATED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. LOUIS LAZAR, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Argued May 5, 1925
Decided May 19, 1925.
Before Justices Parker, Mtnturn and Black.
Eor the appellant, Herman B. J. W eclcsiein.
For the respondent, Charles II. Boemer.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This suit was brought in the Passaic District Court to recover the balance due of $14.80 on a written contract. The case was tried by the judge without a jury, resulting in a judgment for the defendant.
The case is controlled by the case of Edison Fixture Co., Inc., v. Copoulos, 3 N. J. Adv. R. (at p. 174); 127 Atl. Rep. 551. In that case, it was said we are unable to find any evidence justifying the judgment. So, in the present case.
The judgment is reversed and a venire de novo awarded.