Case Name: Adedokun Idowu ADEKOYA, a/k/a Adedokun Idowu Oladehinde Adekoya, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-09-27
Citations: 540 F. App'x 189
Docket Number: No. 13-1412
Parties: Adedokun Idowu ADEKOYA, a/k/a Adedokun Idowu Oladehinde Adekoya, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 540
Pages: 189–190

Head Matter:
Adedokun Idowu ADEKOYA, a/k/a Adedokun Idowu Oladehinde Adekoya, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 13-1412.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 16, 2013.
Decided: Sept. 27, 2013.
Randall L. Johnson, Johnson & Associates, PC, Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner. Stuart F. Delery, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Allen W. Hausman, Senior Litigation Counsel, Jeffrey J. Bernstein, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Adedokun Idowu Adekoya, a native and citizen of Nigeria, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reconsider. The Board "enjoys broad discretion to grant or deny a motion to reconsider," Jean v. Gonzales, 435 F.3d 475, 483 (4th Cir.2006); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2013). This court reviews a denial of a motion to reconsider for abuse of discretion. Jean, 435 F.3d at 481.
We have reviewed the record and the Board's order and find no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. In re: Adekoya (B.I.A. Feb. 25, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.