Case Name: Mickael JACKSON a/k/a Michael Jackson, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2017-06-21
Citations: 219 So. 3d 899
Docket Number: No. 4D14-4918
Parties: Mickael JACKSON a/k/a Michael Jackson, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Ciklin, C. J., Taylor and Levine, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 219
Pages: 899–899

Head Matter:
Mickael JACKSON a/k/a Michael Jackson, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D14-4918
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
[June 21, 2017]
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Peggy Natale, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Matthew Steven Ocksrider, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
Per Curiam.
In our original decision, this court affirmed appellant's consecutive sentences imposed under section 775.087(2)(d), commonly known as-the 10-20-Life statute, for armed carjacking and robbery with a firearm; which occurred on the same date and involved the same victim. On réview of a certified question concerning whether section 775.087(2)(d) requires consecutive sentences when the sentences arise from one criminal episode, the supreme court quashed our decision and remanded for reconsideration in light of Walton v. State, 208 So.3d 60 (Fla. 2016), and Williams v. State, 186 So.3d 989 (Fla. 2016), which were decided after the issuance of our opinion. Consistent with those decisions, we reverse appellant's consecutive sentences and remand for resentencing consistent with the supreme court's decision.
Reversed and remanded for resentenc-ing.
Ciklin, C. J., Taylor and Levine, JJ., concur.