Case Name: Alan V. KIDWELL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1981-02-24
Citations: 394 So. 2d 526
Docket Number: No. 80-637
Parties: Alan V. KIDWELL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before HENDRY, BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 394
Pages: 526–526

Head Matter:
Alan V. KIDWELL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 80-637.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 24, 1981.
Rehearing Denied March 30,1981.
Mandina & Lipsky, Miami, Gargiulo & McMenimen and Brian J. McMenimen, Boston, Mass, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Steven R. Jacob, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before HENDRY, BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. The points raised by Kidwell on this appeal were not preserved below by appropriate objection, motion, or request for instruction. State v. Cumbie, 380 So.2d 1031 (Fla.1980); Clark v. State, 363 So.2d 331 (Fla.1978); Bailey v. State, 393 So.2d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Mead v. State, 381 So.2d 743 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Simpson v. State, 211 So.2d 862 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968). Kidwell's claim that his trial counsel was ineffective cannot properly be raised for the first time on direct appeal and is a matter to be presented to the trial court under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. State v. Barber, 301 So.2d 7 (Fla.1974); Valero v. State, 393 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).