Case Name: William H. Wohlberg, Appellee, v. Merchants Reserve Life Insurance Company, Appellant
Court: Illinois Appellate Court
Jurisdiction: Illinois
Decision Date: 1919-03-18
Citations: 213 Ill. App. 389
Docket Number: Gen. No. 24,207
Parties: William H. Wohlberg, Appellee, v. Merchants Reserve Life Insurance Company, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Illinois Appellate Court Reports
Volume: 213
Pages: 389–390

Head Matter:
William H. Wohlberg, Appellee, v. Merchants Reserve Life Insurance Company, Appellant.
Gen. No. 24,207.
1. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 26 —when original stenographic report stricken from files. The original stenographic report having been filed in lieu of a copy thereof, without the requisite stipulation authorizing such procedure, it will be stricken from the files on motion of appellee.
2. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 31 —when judgment affirmed. The stenographic report, filed as part of the record upon appeal from the Municipal Court, having been stricken from the files on motion of appellee, and the common-law record presenting no question to the court, the judgment will be affirmed.
Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Howard Hates, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1918.
Affirmed.
Opinion filed March 18, 1919.
Gideon S. Thompson, for appellant.
Channing L. Sentz, for appellee.
See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Opinion:
Mr. Presiding Justice McDonald
delivered the opinion of the court.
This is an appeal by defendant, the Merchants Reserve Life Insurance Company, from a judgment against it for $4,679.43, entered on a directed verdict, in an action of the first class brought in the Municipal Court of Chicago.
Plaintiff (appellee) has filed a motion to strike from the record the original stenographic report which was filed in lieu of a copy thereof, without the requisite stipulation authorizing such procedure. This motion was reserved to the hearing.
The question presented by said motion having been decided in the recent case of Marshall Field & Co. v. Nyman, 285 Ill. 306, in favor of plaintiff's contention here, the motion must be allowed.
The original stenographic report will therefore be stricken from the record; and there being no question presented by the common-law record before us, the judgment will be affirmed.
Affirmed.