Case Name: AARON DICHTER, RESPONDENT, v. HARRY ISAACSON ET AL., APPELLANTS
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1927-10-17
Citations: 104 N.J.L. 167
Docket Number: 
Parties: AARON DICHTER, RESPONDENT, v. HARRY ISAACSON ET AL., APPELLANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 104
Pages: 167–168

Head Matter:
AARON DICHTER, RESPONDENT, v. HARRY ISAACSON ET AL., APPELLANTS.
Submitted May 27, 1927
Decided October 17, 1927.
For the respondent, Joseph J. Mutnich, Jr.
For the appellants, Winfield 8. Angleman.

Opinion:
Pee Cueiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chiee Justice, Teenchaed, Kalisch, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Yah Buskibk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Deae, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.