Case Name: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Edward BORZELLECA, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2008-02-14
Citations: 942 A.2d 894
Docket Number: 
Parties: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Edward BORZELLECA, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 942
Pages: 894–895

Head Matter:
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Edward BORZELLECA, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Feb. 14, 2008.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 14th day of February, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Whether the Superior Court misapplied the unambiguous language of the 2002 amendment to the compulsory joinder rule, 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 110, that limited the rule by requiring joinder of only crimes that "occurred within the same judicial district" as a former prosecution, an amendment that this Court has not yet authoritatively interpreted?
Petitioner's Application to File Amended Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.