Case Name: Robert W. Young, Respondent, v. Village of Potsdam, Appellant, et al., Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1945-09-19
Citations: 269 A.D. 918
Docket Number: 
Parties: Robert W. Young, Respondent, v. Village of Potsdam, Appellant, et al., Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 269
Pages: 918–918

Head Matter:
Robert W. Young, Respondent, v. Village of Potsdam, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Opinion:
The only question presented is identical with that in McCarthy v. City of Saratoga Springs (269 App. Div. 469). Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Foster and Lawrence, JJ., concur; Heffernan and Brewster, JJ., concur on the authority of McCarthy v. City of Saratoga Springs (269 App. Div. 469); Hill, P. J., concurs on such authority and upon Bernardine v. City of New York (294 N. Y. 361). [See post, p. 1005.]