Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Lauro Gonzalez DOMINGUEZ, also known as Lauro Dominguez Gonzalez, also known as Lauro Gonzales Dominguez, also known as Lauro D. Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-03-12
Citations: 596 F. App'x 344
Docket Number: No. 14-20096
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Lauro Gonzalez DOMINGUEZ, also known as Lauro Dominguez Gonzalez, also known as Lauro Gonzales Dominguez, also known as Lauro D. Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 596
Pages: 344–345

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Lauro Gonzalez DOMINGUEZ, also known as Lauro Dominguez Gonzalez, also known as Lauro Gonzales Dominguez, also known as Lauro D. Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 14-20096
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 12, 2015.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Margaret Christina Ling, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before KING, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Lauro Gonzalez Dominguez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Gonzalez Dominguez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.