Case Name: Scherry McCLELLAND, a/k/a Sherry McClelland, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2008-09-05
Citations: 995 So. 2d 557
Docket Number: No. 2D07-1793
Parties: Scherry McCLELLAND, a/k/a Sherry McClelland, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SILBERMAN and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 995
Pages: 557–557

Head Matter:
Scherry McCLELLAND, a/k/a Sherry McClelland, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D07-1793.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Sept. 5, 2008.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Steven L. Bolotin, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Timothy A. Freeland, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appel-lee.

Opinion:
ALTENBERND, Judge.
Scherry McClelland appeals a judgment for driving under the influence and causing death (DUI manslaughter), driving while license suspended, and child neglect. The judgment was entered based upon Ms. McClelland's negotiated plea of guilty to the charges. After the judgment was entered, Ms. McClelland filed a pro se motion to withdraw plea pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.170(£). The circuit court summarily denied this motion.
We affirm the judgment and sentences but note that the circuit court should have stricken the motion to withdraw plea rather than deny the motion on the merits. See Sheppard v. State, 988 So.2d 74, 79 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008); Mourra v. State, 884 So.2d 316, 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). If Ms. McClelland is later able to assert a valid claim for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, the court's denial of the motion to withdraw plea should not be deemed to have any preclusive effect on the motion for postconviction relief.
Affirmed.
SILBERMAN and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.