Case Name: ROBERT RONALD THOMPSON, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1992-07-08
Citations: 114 Or. App. 222
Docket Number: CA A66437
Parties: ROBERT RONALD THOMPSON, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE, Respondent.
Judges: Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 114
Pages: 222–223

Head Matter:
On petitioner’s petition for reconsideration filed March 17,
reconsideration granted; opinion (111 Or App 444, 823 P2d 1051) withdrawn; affirmed July 8,
petition for review denied September 29, 1992 (314 Or 392)
ROBERT RONALD THOMPSON, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE, Respondent.
(CA A66437)
832 P2d 54
Lawrence J. Hall, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, for petition.
Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
In Thompson v. Board of Parole, 111 Or App 444, 823 P2d 1051 (1992), we dismissed the petition for judicial review, relying on Denham v. Board of Parole, 106 Or App 234, 806 P2d 1167 (1991), because defendant sought review of the order setting his parole release date, instead of the order on administrative review. Under Owens v. Board of Parole, 113 Or App 507, 834 P2d 547 (1992), we erred in dismissing the petition. We grant reconsideration, withdraw our opinion and affirm.
Reconsideration granted; opinion withdrawn; affirmed.