Case Name: David RICE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FAIRFIELD COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-08-29
Citations: 444 F. App'x 667
Docket Number: No. 11-1495
Parties: David RICE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FAIRFIELD COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 444
Pages: 667–668

Head Matter:
David RICE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FAIRFIELD COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 11-1495.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 25, 2011.
Decided: Aug. 29, 2011.
David Rice, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
David Rice appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rice v. Fairfield Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't, No. 0:11-cv-00310-JFA (D.S.C. Apr. 21, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.