Case Name: J. W. Whitice v. State
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1936-06-18
Citations: 125 Fla. 221
Docket Number: 
Parties: J. W. Whitice v. State
Judges: Whitfield, C. J., and Ellis, Terrell, Brown, Buford; and Davis, J. J., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 125
Pages: 221–222

Head Matter:
J. W. Whitice v. State
169 So. 927
Opinion Filed June 18, 1936.
Errol S. Wittes, for Plaintiff in Error;
Cary D. Landis, Attorney General, and Roy Campbell, Assistant Attorney General, and Angus Sumner, State Attorney, for the State.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
— Upon consideration of the entire record in this cause, we are convinced that the ends of justice require a new trial. So the judgment of the Circuit Court is hereby reversed. See Coker v. State, 83 Fla. 672, 93 Sou. Rep. 176; Howell v. State, 121 Fla. 327, 163 So. 691; Woodward v. State, 113 Fla. 301, 151 So. 509; Pass v. State, 121 Fla. 336, 163 So. 583; Davis v. State, 76 Fla. 179; 79 So. 450.
Reversed.
Whitfield, C. J., and Ellis, Terrell, Brown, Buford; and Davis, J. J., concur.