Case Name: STOUT v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1913-01-08
Citations: 152 S.W. 927
Docket Number: 
Parties: STOUT v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 152
Pages: 927–927

Head Matter:
STOUT v. STATE.
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Jan. 8, 1913.)
Criminal Law (§ 1094*) — Appeal—Affirmance.
Where the court properly submitted the offense charged, and the record contains neither a statement of facts nor bill of exceptions, a conviction will be affirmed.
[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2807, 3204; Dec. Dig. § 1094.*]
Appeal from Tom Green County Court; Oscar Frink, Judge.
I. E. Stout was convicted of the offense of allowing minors to enter and remain in a poolroom, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Opinion:
HARPER, J.
Appellant was prosecuted and convicted under that part of the Code prohibiting minors from entering or remaining in a poolroom. He gave notice of appeal, but in the record there is neither a statement of facts nor bills of exception.
As the court properly submitted the offense charged, the judgment is affirmed.