Case Name: HUGH H. MARA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYONNE ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1910-02-28
Citations: 78 N.J.L. 740
Docket Number: 
Parties: HUGH H. MARA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYONNE ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 78
Pages: 740–741

Head Matter:
HUGH H. MARA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAYONNE ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR.
Submitted December 6, 1909
Decided February 28, 1910.
On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 48 Yroom 288.
For the plaintiffs in error, Elmer W. Demarest.
For the defendant in error, Daniel J. Murray and Thomas F. Noonan.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Without finding it necessary to adopt in its entirety the reasoning of the court below upon the constitutional questions raised in this case, we have no difficulty in coming to the conclusion that the act of the legislature under consideration (Pamph L. 1908, p. 266) is not unconstitutional upon any of the grounds upon which its validity is attached.
The judgment under review should be affirmed.