Case Name: Elmer SANTIAGO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-07-20
Citations: 329 F. App'x 328
Docket Number: No. 08-0016-cv
Parties: Elmer SANTIAGO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: PRESENT: GUIDO CALABRESI, Circuit Judge, EDWARD R. KORMAN, District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 329
Pages: 328–329

Head Matter:
Elmer SANTIAGO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 08-0016-cv.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
July 20, 2009.
Elmer G. Santiago, pro se, Bronx, N.Y., for Appellant.
Norman Corenthal, New York City Law Department, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y., for Appellee.
PRESENT: GUIDO CALABRESI, Circuit Judge, EDWARD R. KORMAN, District Judge.
The Honorable Debra Ann Livingston, who was originally assigned to the panel for this appeal, recused herself and did not participate. The appeal was heard and decided by the panel's remaining two judges pursuant to this Court's Local Rule § 0.14(b).
The Honorable Edward R. Korman, Senior Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
SUMMARY ORDER
Appellant Elmer Santiago, pro se, appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment dismissing his complaint alleging violations of the Family and Medical Leave Act ("FMLA") and the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"). We assume the parties' familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history of the case, and the issues on appeal.
We review a district court's order granting summary judgment de novo, and ask whether the court properly concluded that there were no genuine issues of material fact and that the moving party was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Miller v. Wolpoff & Abramson, L.L.P., 321 F.3d 292, 300 (2d Cir.2003).
After reviewing all of Santiago's contentions on appeal and the record, we AFFIRM the judgment below for substantially the reasons stated by the district court in its thorough opinion and order.