Case Name: Union Trust Company of Rochester, Appellant, v. George E. Francis, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1934-06
Citations: 242 A.D. 674
Docket Number: 
Parties: Union Trust Company of Rochester, Appellant, v. George E. Francis, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 242
Pages: 674–674

Head Matter:
Union Trust Company of Rochester, Appellant, v. George E. Francis, Respondent.

Opinion:
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on the ground that it was within the discretion of the Special Term to deny the motion inasmuch as it was not made within ten days after the service of the amended answer (Rules Civ. Prac. rule 109; Hale v. Hirsch, 205 App. Div. 308), and no explanation of the laches was offered. AH concur.