Case Name: Josef Teitelbaum, an Infant, by Aron Teitelbaum, His Guardian ad Litem, et al., Appellants, v. Edward Colin, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1956-11-07
Citations: 2 A.D.2d 879
Docket Number: 
Parties: Josef Teitelbaum, an Infant, by Aron Teitelbaum, His Guardian ad Litem, et al., Appellants, v. Edward Colin, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 2
Pages: 879–879

Head Matter:
Josef Teitelbaum, an Infant, by Aron Teitelbaum, His Guardian ad Litem, et al., Appellants, v. Edward Colin, Respondent.

Opinion:
Order denying plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration of the denial for a preference, and order denying plaintiffs' motion for a preference, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without prejudice to a new application on adequate papers. There is no affidavit of the doctor who treated plaintiff. The affidavit of the neurologist is insufficient, for among other things it fails to show when the examination was had. Nor does this affidavit establish any causal connection between the accident and plaintiff's alleged ailments. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Botein, Rabin, Frank and Valente, JJ. [See post, p. 966.]