Case Name: Carmel CURRERI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-02-16
Citations: 122 F. App'x 37
Docket Number: No. 04-1383
Parties: Carmel CURRERI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before MICHAEL and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 122
Pages: 37–38

Head Matter:
Carmel CURRERI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 04-1383.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 26, 2005.
Decided: Feb. 16, 2005.
Darren Margolis, Bierer & Margolis, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland; Mitchell Peiser, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant.
Daniel J. Tobin, Kirkpatrick & Lock-hart, L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Before MICHAEL and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Carmel Curreri appeals the district court's orders granting the Defendant's motion for summary judgment and denying Curreri's motion for reconsideration in his civil action. Curreri alleges the district court erred by granting summary judgment to the Defendant on Curreri's claims to declare a deed of trust void and for compensatory damages, and on the Defendant's counterclaim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Curreri v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co., No. CA-03-227-JFM (D. Md. Dec. 11, 2003; Feb. 9, 2004; filed June 23, 2004 & entered June 24, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED