Case Name: STORY v. STRAWBERRY GROWERS SELLING COMPANY
Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1926-06-26
Citations: 4 La. App. 467
Docket Number: 
Parties: STORY v. STRAWBERRY GROWERS SELLING COMPANY
Judges: 
Reporter: Louisiana Court of Appeals Reports
Volume: 4
Pages: 467–467

Head Matter:
No. -
First Circuit
STORY v. STRAWBERRY GROWERS SELLING COMPANY
(June 26, 1926, Opinion and Decree)
Ellis and Ellis, of Rayville, attorneys for plaintiff, appellant.
J. H. Inman, of Ponchatoula, attorney for defendant, appellee.

Opinion:
LECHE, J.
This suit is practically analogous to that of Puleston vs. the same defendant, this day decided.
The claim for rent here, is two hundred and twenty-five dollars and plaintiff seeks to hold defendant responsible as factor of Sam Lascare, upon grounds similar to those alleged in the Puleston case. While the facts are not exactly identical, the evidence does not take the case out of the rule recognized by this court in the case of Puleston and the decision herein is controlled by the principle therein announced.
For these reasons the judgment herein should be affirmed and
it is ' so ordered.