Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Antonio Velasquez, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1990-12-11
Citations: 168 A.D.2d 280
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Antonio Velasquez, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 168
Pages: 280–280

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Antonio Velasquez, Appellant.

Opinion:
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bernard Fried, J.), rendered on October 28, 1988, convicting defendant, upon a plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and burglary in the third degree and sentencing defendant to concurrent indeterminate terms of imprisonment of 3 to 9 years on the first charge and 1 to 3 years on the second charge, respectively, unanimously affirmed.
We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction", we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. (People v Farrar, 52 NY2d 302, 305.)
Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and within statutory guidelines. "Having received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms." (People v Felman, 141 AD2d 889, 890, lv denied 72 NY2d 918.) Concur—Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Milonas, Rosenberger and Ellerin, JJ.