Case Name: Christopher LOWE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-10-25
Citations: 661 So. 2d 952
Docket Number: No. 94-2864
Parties: Christopher LOWE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: GLICKSTEIN, STONE and FARMER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 661
Pages: 952–953

Head Matter:
Christopher LOWE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 94-2864.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Oct. 25, 1995.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Paul E. Petillo, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Georgina Jimenez-Orosa, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The sentence appealed represents the fourth time that the defendant has been placed on community control. The state concedes his sentence should have reflected credit for the time he previously spent on community control. See State v. Roundtree, 644 So.2d 1358 (Fla.1994); Poulsen v. State, 610 So.2d 710 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). Accordingly, we reverse and remand with direction to the trial court to credit defendant's two year community control sentence with the time already served on community control.
The state further concedes and the record reflects that the trial court found defendant guilty of only one of the alleged violations of community control. Because the order revoking defendant's community control reflects a finding that defendant violated all five of the alleged violations, the trial court is further directed to correct the order to reflect its actual findings. See Vann v. State, 441 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983).
GLICKSTEIN, STONE and FARMER, JJ., concur.