Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kirk JENKINS, also known as Pimp Jenkins, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-12-15
Citations: 671 F. App'x 336
Docket Number: No. 16-30509 Summary Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kirk JENKINS, also known as Pimp Jenkins, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 671
Pages: 336–337

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kirk JENKINS, also known as Pimp Jenkins, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-30509 Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Date Filed: 12/15/2016
Jeffrey Keith Sandman, Kevin G. Boit-mann, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, Diane Hollenshead Copes, Esq., Assistant U.S. Attorney, Nolan D. Paige, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Louisiana, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Kirk Jenkins, Pro Se
Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Kirk Jenkins has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Jenkins has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. Though counsel does not specifically address the validity of the ap peal waiver in Jenkins's plea agreement, there is no indication in the record that Jenkins's ratification of the plea agreement was anything but knowing and voluntary. As such, we concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as frivolous, see 5th Cir. R. 42.2, and in part as moot based on Jenkins's completion of his term of imprisonment, see United States v. Heredia-Holguin, 823 F.3d 337, 340-42 (5th Cir. 2016).
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.