Case Name: Keith T. Manning et al. v. Harold J. Barenz et al.
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1991-06-21
Citations: 219 Conn. 914
Docket Number: 
Parties: Keith T. Manning et al. v. Harold J. Barenz et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 219
Pages: 914–914

Head Matter:
Keith T. Manning et al. v. Harold J. Barenz et al.
David W. Cooney and Kathryn Calibey, in support of the petition.
Andrew J. O’Keefe and Maureen Sullivan Dinnan, in opposition.
Decided June 21, 1991

Opinion:
The plaintiffs' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 24 Conn. App. 592, is granted, limited to the following issues:
"1. Do the recreational land use statutes, General Statutes § 52-557Í et seq., apply to (a) municipalities, and (b) employees of municipalities?
"2. If the statutes do so apply, do they apply to the conduct of the defendants involved in this case?"