Case Name: SCHICKEDANZ BROS.-RIVIERA LTD., a Florida Limited Partnership, Schickedanz Bros.-Palm Beach, Ltd., a Florida Limited Partnership, Schickedanz Enterprises, Inc., the corporate general partner of Schickedanz Bros.-Riviera Ltd., and Schickedanz Bros.-Palm Beach, Ltd., Appellants, v. Robert HARRIS and Real Estate Marketing And Consulting, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2011-07-13
Citations: 82 So. 3d 928
Docket Number: No. 4D10-457
Parties: SCHICKEDANZ BROS.-RIVIERA LTD., a Florida Limited Partnership, Schickedanz Bros.-Palm Beach, Ltd., a Florida Limited Partnership, Schickedanz Enterprises, Inc., the corporate general partner of Schickedanz Bros.-Riviera Ltd., and Schickedanz Bros.-Palm Beach, Ltd., Appellants, v. Robert HARRIS and Real Estate Marketing And Consulting, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.
Judges: STEVENSON, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 82
Pages: 928–928

Head Matter:
SCHICKEDANZ BROS.-RIVIERA LTD., a Florida Limited Partnership, Schickedanz Bros.-Palm Beach, Ltd., a Florida Limited Partnership, Schickedanz Enterprises, Inc., the corporate general partner of Schickedanz Bros.-Riviera Ltd., and Schickedanz Bros.-Palm Beach, Ltd., Appellants, v. Robert HARRIS and Real Estate Marketing And Consulting, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.
No. 4D10-457.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
July 13, 2011.
Jane Kreusler-Walsh and Barbara J. Compiani of Kreusler-Walsh, Compiani & Vargas, P.A., West Palm Beach, and Rodney L. Tennyson of Rodney L. Tennyson, P.A., Lantana, for appellants.
Michael J. Ryan, North Palm Beach, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm, in part, the second amended final judgment post mandate on rehearing. We reverse that portion of the final judgment failing to award appellant prejudgment interest. We remand to the circuit court to enter an award of prejudgment interest from the date that appellant filed its counterclaim. See Ganot Corp. v. J.M.G. Constr. Corp., 560 So.2d 804, 804-05 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). The trial court did not err in awarding prejudgment interest to appellee. See Westgate Miami Beach, Ltd. v. Newport Operating Corp., 55 So.3d 567, 575 (Fla.2010).
STEVENSON, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.