Case Name: MARGARET E. MACK vs. FREDERICK G. MACK
Court: Connecticut Superior Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1936-05-20
Citations: 4 Conn. Supp. 44
Docket Number: File #48903
Parties: MARGARET E. MACK vs. FREDERICK G. MACK
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Supplement
Volume: 4
Pages: 44–45

Head Matter:
MARGARET E. MACK vs. FREDERICK G. MACK
Superior Court New Haven County
File #48903
Present: Hon. CARL FOSTER, Judge.
T. H. Bracken, Attorney for the Plaintiff.
F. E. Bollman, Attorney for the Defendant.
MEMORANDUM FILED MAY 20, 1936.

Opinion:
FOSTER, J.
The plaintiff should allege with particularity the acts of cruelty of which she complains, and the dates and places at which they ti ok place, in so far as she is able to do so. Such a statement uhould be concise and not in lengthy narrative form. It should fairly apprise the defendant of the charges proposed to be made.
In ruling in this general manner the Court is not disposed to bar the defendant from filing a further motion for more specific statement if the statement filed in response to this motion is not sufficiently full and complete; neither is it the intention of the Court to foreclose the plaintiff from presenting evidence at the trial of matters not appearing in the more specific statement if the trial court is of the opinion that such matters should be heard.
In this qualified manner the motion is granted.