Case Name: Harry SCHULTE, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. SSM DEPAUL HEALTH CENTER, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2009-01-20
Citations: 277 S.W.3d 290
Docket Number: No. ED 91287
Parties: Harry SCHULTE, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. SSM DEPAUL HEALTH CENTER, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before BOOKER T. SHAW, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and MARY K. HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 277
Pages: 290–290

Head Matter:
Harry SCHULTE, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. SSM DEPAUL HEALTH CENTER, Defendant/Respondent.
No. ED 91287.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Jan. 20, 2009.
G. Michael Flotte, Florissant, MO, for appellant.
Rodney M. Sharp, Natalie J. Kussart, Sandberg, Phoenix & von Gontard, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before BOOKER T. SHAW, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and MARY K. HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff, Harry Schulte, appeals from the entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant, SSM DePaul Health Center. No error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).