Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel HERRERA-CHAVEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-03-17
Citations: 58 F. App'x 728
Docket Number: No. 01-10656; D.C. No. CR-00-00608-WHA
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Daniel HERRERA-CHAVEZ, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 58
Pages: 728–729

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Daniel HERRERA-CHAVEZ, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 01-10656.
D.C. No. CR-00-00608-WHA.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 10, 2003.
Decided March 17, 2003.
Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN and T. G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Daniel Herrera-Chavez appeals his conviction by guilty plea and his 70-month sentence for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Herrera-Chavez's counsel has submitted a brief stating that he has found no meritorious issues for review. Appellant has not filed a supplemental pro se brief.
Our independent review of the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346,102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no issues requiring further review. Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.