Case Name: ADRIAN INVESTMENT CORPORATION and Pedro Adrian, Appellants, v. Antonio JACOMINO and Eugenio Sanson, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1983-03-01
Citations: 427 So. 2d 335
Docket Number: No. 82-1308
Parties: ADRIAN INVESTMENT CORPORATION and Pedro Adrian, Appellants, v. Antonio JACOMINO and Eugenio Sanson, Appellees.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HENDRY and BASKIN, JJ. -
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 427
Pages: 335–336

Head Matter:
ADRIAN INVESTMENT CORPORATION and Pedro Adrian, Appellants, v. Antonio JACOMINO and Eugenio Sanson, Appellees.
No. 82-1308.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 1, 1983.
Nestor Morales, Miami, for appellants.
Fine, Jacobson, Block, Klein, Colan & Simon and Joseph H. Serota, Miami, for ap-pellees.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HENDRY and BASKIN, JJ. -

Opinion:
SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.
The summary judgment entered below on the appellants' cross-claim for payment of any brokerage commission which might be recovered against them by the plaintiff in the main action is reversed because the record demonstrates that there is a genuine issue as to whether the appellants agreed to purchase the property in question in reliance upon representations of an agent of the appellees-cross-defendants that he alone, and thus not the plaintiff-broker, was involved in the transaction. Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); see Joiner v. McCullers, 158 Fla. 562, 28 So.2d 823 (1947); Watson v. Jones, 41 Fla. 241, 25 So. 678 (1899).