Case Name: In the Matter of Eli Rosenblatt, Respondent, v. New York State Tax Commission et al., Appellants, et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1986-09-04
Citations: 68 N.Y.2d 775
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Eli Rosenblatt, Respondent, v New York State Tax Commission et al., Appellants, et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 68
Pages: 775–777

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Eli Rosenblatt, Respondent, v New York State Tax Commission et al., Appellants, et al., Respondents.
Decided September 4, 1986
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Robert Hermann, Peter H Schiff and Nancy A. Spiegel of counsel), for appellants.
Sanford F. Young for petitioner-respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), judgment insofar as appealed from reversed, with costs, and the Tax Commission's determination of a deficiency against petitioner Rosenblatt reinstated for reasons stated in the concurring in part and dissenting in part opinion by Justice Ann T. Mikoll at the Appellate Division (114 AD2d 127, 132-133).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr.