Case Name: Margaret KINNALLY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-10-11
Citations: 205 F. App'x 145
Docket Number: No. 06-1335
Parties: Margaret KINNALLY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before MICHAEL, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 205
Pages: 145–146

Head Matter:
Margaret KINNALLY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 06-1335.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 31, 2006.
Decided Oct. 11, 2006.
Margaret Kinnally, Appellant Pro Se. Catherine Brawley Templeton, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, PC, Charleston, South Carolina; Charles Edward Engeman, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, LLC, St. Thomas, Virgin Islands, for Appellee.
Before MICHAEL, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Margaret Kinnally appeals the district court's orders adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to Marriott in her civil action alleging employment discrimination based on age and denying Kinnally's motion to alter or amend the judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Kinnally v. Marriott Int'l, Inc., No. 9:04-cv-02065-PMD, 2006 WL 22182 (D.S.C. Jan. 4, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED