Case Name: Smith vs. Lee & Company
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1889-03-22
Citations: 82 Ga. 674
Docket Number: 
Parties: Smith vs. Lee & Company.
Judges: 
Reporter: Georgia Reports
Volume: 82
Pages: 674–675

Head Matter:
Smith vs. Lee & Company.
The plaintiffs having recovered apparently less, instead of more, than the evidence warranted, there was no canse for granting a new trial at the instance of the other party.
March 22, 1889.
Evidence.’ Verdict. New trial. Before Judge Atkinson. Coffee superior court. May term, 1888.
Report unnecessary.
Roberts & Smith by Harrison & Peeples, for plaintiff in error.
E. P. Padgett, by brief, contra.

Opinion:
Bleckley, Chief Justice.
Lee & Co. recovered against Smith a verdict for $191. We have read all the evidence, and our conclusion is that the recovery, if not precisely correct, was rather less than it should have been. • The court committed no error in refusing to grant a new trial. There is no legal principle involved in the case, and a more extended discussion would be useless.
Judgment affirmed. •