Case Name: William L. ADAMS et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. STATE of Florida ex rel. E. C. BOOZER, Defendant in Error
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1936-07-23
Citations: 169 So. 915
Docket Number: 
Parties: William L. ADAMS et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. STATE of Florida ex rel. E. C. BOOZER, Defendant in Error.
Judges: WHITFIELD, C. J., and ELLIS, TERRELL, BROWN, BUFORD, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter
Volume: 169
Pages: 915–915

Head Matter:
William L. ADAMS et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. STATE of Florida ex rel. E. C. BOOZER, Defendant in Error.
Supreme Court of Florida.
July 23, 1936.
C. H. Landefeld, Jr., of Plollywood, for plaintiffs in error.
Boozer & Boozer, of West Palm Beach, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The writ of error brings for review judgment awarding peremptory writ of mandamus.
The judgment should be affirmed on authority of the opinion and judgment in the cases of Treat et al. v. State ex rel., 118 Fla. 899, 160 So. 498; State ex rel. v. Sholtz et al., 119 Fla. 701, 704, 160 So. 872; and City of Bradenton v. State, 117 Fla. 578, 579, 158 So. 165.
It is so ordered. Affirmed.
WHITFIELD, C. J., and ELLIS, TERRELL, BROWN, BUFORD, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.