Case Name: LILLIAN BENEDETTO, AN INFANT WHO SUES BY PATSY BENEDETTO, HER NEXT FRIEND, AND PATSY BENEDETTO, RESPONDENTS, v. EDWARD F. FLECKENSTEIN AND ALBERT F. FLECKENSTEIN, PARTNERS TRADING AS ED. FLECKENSTEIN'S SONS, APPELLANTS
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1931-05-18
Citations: 108 N.J.L. 184
Docket Number: 
Parties: LILLIAN BENEDETTO, AN INFANT WHO SUES BY PATSY BENEDETTO, HER NEXT FRIEND, AND PATSY BENEDETTO, RESPONDENTS, v. EDWARD F. FLECKENSTEIN AND ALBERT F. FLECKENSTEIN, PARTNERS TRADING AS ED. FLECKENSTEIN’S SONS, APPELLANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 108
Pages: 184–184

Head Matter:
LILLIAN BENEDETTO, AN INFANT WHO SUES BY PATSY BENEDETTO, HER NEXT FRIEND, AND PATSY BENEDETTO, RESPONDENTS, v. EDWARD F. FLECKENSTEIN AND ALBERT F. FLECKENSTEIN, PARTNERS TRADING AS ED. FLECKENSTEIN’S SONS, APPELLANTS.
Submitted February 13, 1931
Decided May 18, 1931.
For the appellants, Heine & Laird.
For the respondents, Joseph J. Loori.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the per curiam opinion of the Supreme Court ubi supra.
We note that the Supreme Court gives the date of the interlocutory judgment as in June, 1929, whereas in fact it was entered on March 25th, 1927. This, however, is immaterial so far as relates to any merit in the appeal, and we mention it merely in the interest of accuracy.
For affirmance — Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Daly, Donges, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.