Case Name: UNION GRADED SCHOOL DIST. No. 106 v. INDEPENDENT CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DIST. No. 6
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1933-01-31
Citations: 162 Okla. 18
Docket Number: No. 23947
Parties: UNION GRADED SCHOOL DIST. No. 106 v. INDEPENDENT CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DIST. No. 6.
Judges: 
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 162
Pages: 18–18

Head Matter:
UNION GRADED SCHOOL DIST. No. 106 v. INDEPENDENT CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DIST. No. 6.
No. 23947.
Opinion Filed Jan. 31, 1933.
P. K. Morrill and (Frank Petree, for plaintiff in error.
Harry O. Hicks and W. O. Austin, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appeal was lodged on the 6th day of August, 1932, from, the county .court of Harmon county, Okla., the record of appeal being made by transcript. Motion to dismiss! was filed September 29, 1932. On October 11, 1932, plaintiff in error filed, by leave of court, its brief, in which it joins the merits of the case and a response fioi the motion to dismiss.
We have carefully checked the eitatious in both the brief on the motion to dismiss and the brief submitted by the plaintiff in error, and find that the judgment of the court fairly determinéis the law, and that the argument that the county court never obtained jurisdiction of the attempted appeal is well supported. Randol v. Harbour-Longmire Co., 127 Okla. 7, 259 P. 548.
It being apparent that no good can come from further delay in this court, and that the appeal is not meritorious, the appeal is dismissed.