Case Name: Pernorris TAYLOR, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Larry G. MASSANARI, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-11-13
Citations: 50 F. App'x 147
Docket Number: No. 02-2081
Parties: Pernorris TAYLOR, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Larry G. MASSANARI, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILLIAM D. WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 50
Pages: 147–147

Head Matter:
Pernorris TAYLOR, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Larry G. MASSANARI, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 02-2081.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 7, 2002.
Decided Nov. 13, 2002.
Pernorris Taylor, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Debra Jean Prillaman, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia; George G. Davidson, Social Security Administration, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before WILLIAM D. WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Pernorris Taylor seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing his civil complaint without prejudice for failure to file a more definite statement as instructed by the magistrate judge's prior order. Because Taylor may be able to proceed with this action by amending his complaint by filing a more definite statement, the dismissal order is not final and thus is not subject to appellate review. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.