Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jason William HALLUM, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-09-16
Citations: 143 F. App'x 859
Docket Number: No. 03-50371; D.C. No. CR-02-01120-VAP-1
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jason William HALLUM, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before REINHARDT, RYMER, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 143
Pages: 859–859

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jason William HALLUM, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 03-50371.
D.C. No. CR-02-01120-VAP-1.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 12, 2005.
Decided Sept. 16, 2005.
Hanley Chew, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Philip Deitch, Law Office of Philip Deitch, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before REINHARDT, RYMER, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Jason William Hallum appeals his jury-trial conviction and sentence for conspiracy to commit mail theft and possession of stolen mail, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 and 1708.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Hallum has filed a brief and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record, stating there are no grounds for relief. No pro se supplemental brief has been filed.
We have conducted an independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988). We affirm the conviction. We remand the sentence for further proceedings consistent with United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez, 419 F.3d 906, 915-16 (9th Cir.2005).
Counsel's motion to withdraw as counsel on appeal is denied.
The conviction is AFFIRMED, and the sentence is REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.