Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alfredo OLMOS-HUERTA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-08-22
Citations: 235 F. App'x 628
Docket Number: No. 06-50366
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alfredo OLMOS-HUERTA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: KLEINFELD, SILVERMAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 235
Pages: 628–629

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alfredo OLMOS-HUERTA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-50366.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 13, 2007 .
Filed Aug. 22, 2007.
Michael J. Crowley, Esq., USSD — Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Alfredo Olmos-Huerta, San Diego, CA, pro se.
Elizabeth A. Missakian, Esq., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: KLEINFELD, SILVERMAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Alfredo Olmos-Huerta appeals his conviction following a guilty plea to bringing in illegal aliens without presentation and aggravated identity theft. He contends that the district court erred in denying his motion for substitute counsel. OlmosHuerta's motion preceded his unconditional guilty plea, which constituted a waiver of the right to appeal all non-jurisdictional antecedent rulings. See United States v. Castillo, No. 05-30401, 496 F.3d. 947, 954, 2007 WL 2120232 (9th Cir. July 25, 2007) (en banc); United States v. Lopez-Armenta, 400 F.3d 1173, 1175 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 891, 126 S.Ct. 199, 163 L.Ed.2d 204 (2005). We therefore dismiss the appeal.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.