Case Name: Wilfred WELSH, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Beverly MCNEIL and Alvin Elliott, Appellees/Cross-Appellants
Court: District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Decision Date: 2017-06-29
Citations: 162 A.3d 135
Docket Number: Nos. 15-CV-524 and 15-CV-559
Parties: Wilfred WELSH, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Beverly MCNEIL and Alvin Elliott, Appellees/Cross-Appellants.
Judges: Before Gliekman, Beckwith, and McLeese, Associate Judges.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 162
Pages: 135–159

Head Matter:
Wilfred WELSH, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Beverly MCNEIL and Alvin Elliott, Appellees/Cross-Appellants.
Nos. 15-CV-524 and 15-CV-559
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
(Argued May 12, 2016
Decided June 29, 2017)
Michael C. Forster, for appellant/cross-appellee.
Steven G. Polin, for appellees/cross-ap-pellants.

Opinion:
Opinion by Associate Judge Gliekman, concurring in part and dissenting in part, with whom Associate Judges Beckwith and McLeese join in Parts I, II and III B, at page 139.
Concurring opinion by Associate Judge Beckwith with whom Associate Judge McLeese joins, at page 157.
Before Gliekman, Beckwith, and McLeese, Associate Judges.
Per Curiam
Wilfred Welsh, a member of the Chaplin Woods Homeowners Association ("HOA"), sued fellow HOA members Beverly McNeil and Alvin Elliott (the "McNeils") on the ground that they had leased out their home in violation of the HOA's bylaws. The McNeils brought counterclaims under the Federal Fair Housing Act and the District of Columbia Human Rights Act. The trial court granted summary judgment against Mr. Welsh on the ground that he lacked standing and against the McNeils on the merits. Mr. Welsh and the McNeils now appeal these respective rulings.
As to Mr. Welsh's claims, we reverse the judgment of the trial court for the reasons stated in Judge Beckwith's opinion. As to the McNeils' counterclaims, we reverse the trial court's judgment for the reasons stated in Judge Glickman's opinion. The case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with these opinions.
So ordered.
. 42 U.S.C. § 3601-3619 (2012).
. D.C. Code § 2-1402.21 to 2-1402.24, 2-1402.61 (2012 Repl.).