Case Name: NEWTON v. STATE ex rel. GILMER, Co. Atty
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1948-11-16
Citations: 200 Okla. 688
Docket Number: No. 32375
Parties: NEWTON v. STATE ex rel. GILMER, Co. Atty.
Judges: HURST, C.J., DAVISON, V.C.J.,. and RILEY, WELCH, GIBSON, qnd LUT-TRELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 200
Pages: 688–688

Head Matter:
NEWTON v. STATE ex rel. GILMER, Co. Atty.
No. 32375.
Nov. 16, 1948.
199 P. 2d 613.
Irvine E. Ungerman, of Tulsa, for plaintiff in error.
M. S. Simms, Asst. County Atty., of Tulsa, and Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., Sam M. Lattimore, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.

Opinion:
BAYLESS, J.
This proceeding was commenced subsequent to the proceeding and judgment entered by the court in No. 32246, Willis Newton v. State of Oklahoma ex rel. Dixie Gilmer, County Attorney, 200 Okla. 686, 199 P. 2d 611, in which a judgment was entered in favor of the State of Oklahoma against the said Willis Newton. The issues involved and the parties to this cause are the same as in cause No. 32246.
In view of our holding in cause No. 32246, it is unnecessary to consider this cause further.
Judgment affirmed.
HURST, C.J., DAVISON, V.C.J.,. and RILEY, WELCH, GIBSON, qnd LUT-TRELL, JJ., concur.