Case Name: WALDREP v. HALL COUNTY
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1971-05-06
Citations: 227 Ga. 554
Docket Number: 26436
Parties: WALDREP v. HALL COUNTY.
Judges: All the Justices concur, except Felton, J., who dissents.
Reporter: Georgia Reports
Volume: 227
Pages: 554–560

Head Matter:
26436.
WALDREP v. HALL COUNTY.
Argued April 12, 1971
Decided May 6, 1971.
Robert E. Andrews, for appellant.
Greer, Sartain, Carey & Cromartie, Tifton S. Greer, for appellee.

Opinion:
Nichols, Justice.
1. The first enumeration of error contends that a part of the property allegedly traversed by the road is inside the city limits of the City of Gainesville and that, therefore, the City of Gainesville is a necessary party to the litigation. Under the decision in County of Gordon v. Mayor &c. of Calhoun, 128 Ga. 781 (58 SE 360), relied upon by appellant the city would have been a proper party, but where the issue is whether the road was dedicated by implication at a time when none of the area traversed by the alleged road was inside the corporate limits, the city is not a necessary party to the litigation. Ño question as to duty to maintain such road is involved, but solely whether there exists a public road.
2. The remaining enumerations of error complain that the evidence did not disclose a dedication by the defendant and an acceptance by the plaintiff and that the pleadings and evidence did not show any description of the property which the defendant is enjoined from interfering with.
The judgment of the trial court was authorized by the evidence and supported by the legal principles set forth in such decree. The judgment granting the temporary injunction must be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur, except Felton, J., who dissents.