Case Name: RAIL-TERM CORP., Petitioner v. RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-08-03
Citations: 666 F. App'x 1
Docket Number: No. 11-1093
Parties: RAIL-TERM CORP., Petitioner v. RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent
Judges: BEFORE: Garland, Chief Judge; Kavanaugh, Circuit Judge; and Ginsburg, Senior Circuit Judge
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 666
Pages: 1–1

Head Matter:
RAIL-TERM CORP., Petitioner v. RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent
No. 11-1093
September Term, 2015
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Filed On: August 3, 2016
RRB-BCD-11-14
Dennis Martin Devaney, Esquire, Attorney, Varnum LLP, Novi, MI, John David Heffner, Strasburger & Price, LLP, Michael Francis Smith, The Smith Appellate Law Firm, Washington, DC, for Petitioner
Steven A. Bartholow, General Counsel, Rachel L. Simmons, Esquire, Railroad Retirement Board, (RRRB) Office of Genéral Counsel, Chicago, IL, for Respondent
Robert Edward Paul, Attorney, Michael S. Wolly, Zwerdling, Paul, Kahn & Wolly, PC, Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae for Respondent American Train Dispatchers Association
BEFORE: Garland, Chief Judge; Kavanaugh, Circuit Judge; and Ginsburg, Senior Circuit Judge
Chief Judge Garland was a member of the panel at the time the case was argued but did not participate in this matter.

Opinion:
ORDER
Per Curiam
Upon consideration of respondent's motion for summary affirmance, the opposition thereto, and the reply; and petitioner's motion to govern further proceedings and for supplemental briefing on the issue of whether petitioner is a "rail carrier" under 49 U.S.C. § 10102(5), the opposition thereto, and the reply, it is
ORDERED that petitioner's motion to govern and for supplemental briefing be granted to the extent that this case be returned to the court's active docket and be denied as to the request for supplemental briefing. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that respondent's motion for summary affirmance be granted.
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition' will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.