Case Name: Anthony IRVIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2013-10-15
Citations: 423 S.W.3d 798
Docket Number: No. ED 99722
Parties: Anthony IRVIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., KURT S. ODENWALD, J., and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 423
Pages: 798–799

Head Matter:
Anthony IRVIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 99722.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Oct. 15, 2013.
Amanda P. Faerber, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Dora A. Fichter, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., KURT S. ODENWALD, J., and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Anthony Irvin (Movant) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant contends the motion court erred in denying his motion without a hearing because the record does not refute his claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to inform Movant that he faced a maximum prison sentence of fifteen years instead of seven years.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court's decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).