Case Name: Chicago, Milwaukee, and St. Paul Railroad Company v. Ackley
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1876-10
Citations: 94 U.S. 179
Docket Number: 
Parties: Chicago, Milwaukee, and St. Paul Railroad Company v. Ackley.
Judges: Mr. Justice Field and Mr. Justice Stbong dissented.
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 94
Pages: 179–179

Head Matter:
Chicago, Milwaukee, and St. Paul Railroad Company v. Ackley.
A railroad company in Wisconsin cannot recover for the transportation of property more than the maximum fixed by the act of that State of March 11,1874, by showing that the amount charged was no more than a reasonable compensation for the services rendered.
Ebbob to the Circuit Court of the County of Milwaukee, State of Wisconsin.
Mr. John W. Cary' for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. I. C. Sloan, contra.

Opinion:
Mr. Chief Justice Waite
delivered the opinion of the court.
The only question presented by this record is whether a railroad company in Wisconsin can recover for the transportation of property more than the maximum fixed by the act of March 11, 1874, by showing that the amount charged was no more than a reasonable compensation for the services rendered.
What we have already said in Peik v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Company, and Lawrence v. Same, supra, p. 164, is applicable to this case. As between the company and a freighter, there is a statutory limitation of the charge for transportation actually performed. If the company should refuse to carry at the prices fixed, and an attempt should be made to forfeit its charter on that account, other questions might arise, which it will be time enough to consider when they are presented. But for goods actually carried, the limit of the recovery is that prescribed by the statute. Judgment affirmed.
Mr. Justice Field and Mr. Justice Stbong dissented.