Case Name: Randall BYARS, Plaintiff - Appellant v. WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK; Select Portfolio Servicing Inc.; DB Structured Products Inc., Defendants - Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-12-17
Citations: 303 F. App'x 211
Docket Number: No. 08-10070
Parties: Randall BYARS, Plaintiff — Appellant v. WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK; Select Portfolio Servicing Inc.; DB Structured Products Inc., Defendants — Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 303
Pages: 211–211

Head Matter:
Randall BYARS, Plaintiff — Appellant v. WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK; Select Portfolio Servicing Inc.; DB Structured Products Inc., Defendants — Appellees.
No. 08-10070
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 17, 2008.
Randall Byars, Desoto, TX, pro se.
Robert L. Negrin, Codilis & Stawiarski, Houston, TX, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before REAVLEY, WIENER, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Plaintiff Randall Byars asks the court to give him a chance to prove his case, but he has given this court and the district court no notice of what is his case. He filed no objection to the motion for summary judgment and he raises no point or argument objecting to the district court's judgment. This court must follow the requirement of Rule 28 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure that appellants state and brief argument on each issue of complaint about the trial court's judgment. For this reason this court must dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Grant v. Cuellar, 59 F.3d 523 (5th Cir.1995).
DISMISSED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.