Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Oscar Aponte ROSARIO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-03-27
Citations: 62 F. App'x 452
Docket Number: No. 02-7565
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Oscar Aponte ROSARIO, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 62
Pages: 452–453

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Oscar Aponte ROSARIO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-7565.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 7, 2003.
Decided March 27, 2003.
Oscar Aponte Rosario, Appellant Pro Se. Janet S. Reincke, Office of the United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Oscar Aponte Rosario seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Rosario has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 1039, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.