Case Name: CARL ASCHENBACH, APPELLANT, v. THE INHABITANTS OF THE CITY OF PLAINFIELD ET AL., RESPONDENTS
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1939-09-22
Citations: 123 N.J.L. 265
Docket Number: 
Parties: CARL ASCHENBACH, APPELLANT, v. THE INHABITANTS OF THE CITY OF PLAINFIELD ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 123
Pages: 265–265

Head Matter:
CARL ASCHENBACH, APPELLANT, v. THE INHABITANTS OF THE CITY OF PLAINFIELD ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Argued May 17, 1939
Decided September 22, 1939.
For the appellant, Joseph J. Mutnik.
For the respondent, William Newcorn.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Porter in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.