Case Name: Carroll GAYLORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. STOUFFER, Commissioner; Corizon, Inc., f/k/a C.M.S., Medical Care Provider; Bobby Shearin, Warden, N.B.C.I.; MD Colin Ottey, Dr., N.B.C.I.; Gregg Flury, P.A., N.B.C.I.; D. Adams, Head Nurse; Monica Metheny, Rn; Steven Bray, RN; Autumn Durst, RN; Timbelie Adams, RN; William Beeman, RN; Breanna Brown, RN, N.B.C.I., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-01-15
Citations: 550 F. App'x 163
Docket Number: No. 13-7274
Parties: Carroll GAYLORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. STOUFFER, Commissioner; Corizon, Inc., f/k/a C.M.S., Medical Care Provider; Bobby Shearin, Warden, N.B.C.I.; MD Colin Ottey, Dr., N.B.C.I.; Gregg Flury, P.A., N.B.C.I.; D. Adams, Head Nurse; Monica Metheny, Rn; Steven Bray, RN; Autumn Durst, RN; Timbelie Adams, RN; William Beeman, RN; Breanna Brown, RN, N.B.C.I., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before DUNCAN, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 550
Pages: 163–164

Head Matter:
Carroll GAYLORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. STOUFFER, Commissioner; Corizon, Inc., f/k/a C.M.S., Medical Care Provider; Bobby Shearin, Warden, N.B.C.I.; MD Colin Ottey, Dr., N.B.C.I.; Gregg Flury, P.A., N.B.C.I.; D. Adams, Head Nurse; Monica Metheny, Rn; Steven Bray, RN; Autumn Durst, RN; Timbelie Adams, RN; William Beeman, RN; Breanna Brown, RN, N.B.C.I., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 13-7274.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 20, 2013.
Decided: Jan. 15, 2014.
Carroll Gaylord, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland; Patricia H. Beall, Marks, O’Neill, O’Brien, Doherty & Kelly, P.C., Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before DUNCAN, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Carroll Gaylord appeals the district court's orders granting summary judgment to Defendants on his claims of deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006), and denying his motion filed pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gaylord v. Stouffer, No. 8:12-cv-02477-DKC, 2013 WL 2947054 (D.Md. June 12, 2013; July 11, 2013). We deny Gaylord's motions to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.