Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arindus HUMPHREY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-01-24
Citations: 3 F. App'x 258
Docket Number: No. 98-3440
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arindus HUMPHREY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before BOGGS and COLE, Circuit Judges, ZATKOFF, District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 3
Pages: 258–258

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arindus HUMPHREY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 98-3440.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Jan. 24, 2001.
Before BOGGS and COLE, Circuit Judges, ZATKOFF, District Judge.
The Honorable Lawrence P. Zatkoff, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
R. GUY COLE, JR., Circuit Judge.
Following a jury trial, Arindus "Red" Humphrey was convicted of one count of conspiracy to possess cocaine and cocaine base and ordered to forfeit certain items of real and personal property. Humphrey appealed his conviction and sentence, asserting, inter alia, that the district court erred in the calculation of the amount of cocaine attributable to him. On March 28, 2000, we affirmed the judgment of the district court on all grounds. See United States v. Humphrey, 210 F.3d 373, 2000 WL 353712 (6th Cir.2000) (unpublished). On November 13, 2000, the United States Supreme Court granted Humphrey's petition for writ of certiorari, vacated the judgment, and remanded the case to us for further consideration in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). See Humphrey v. United States, 531 U.S. 988, 121 S.Ct. 478, 148 L.Ed.2d 451 (2000). Accordingly, we VACATE Humphrey's sentence and REMAND the case to the district court for further consideration in light of Apprendi as well as our decision in United States v. Page, 232 F.3d 536 (6th Cir.2000).