Case Name: HOFFMANN, Plaintiff, and ROTH, Petitioner on Review, v. STOLL, Respondent, and HAGADORN, Respondent on Review
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1988-12-20
Citations: 307 Or. 240
Docket Number: TC No. 8611-07067(c); CA A44238; SC S34937
Parties: HOFFMANN, Plaintiff, and ROTH, Petitioner on Review, v. STOLL, Respondent, and HAGADORN, Respondent on Review.
Judges: Before Peterson, Chief Justice, and Lent, Linde, Campbell, Carson and Gillette, Justices.
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 307
Pages: 240–241

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted June 7,
case dismissed with prejudice and without costs December 20, 1988
HOFFMANN, Plaintiff, and ROTH, Petitioner on Review, v. STOLL, Respondent, and HAGADORN, Respondent on Review.
(TC No. 8611-07067(c); CA A44238; SC S34937)
765 P2d 811
Timothy E. Brophy, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on the petition and supplemental brief were Bradley J. Schrock, and Bernard, Kneeland & Bro-phy, Portland.
Thomas W. Brown, Portland, argued the cause for respondent on review Hagadorn. With him on the response was Cosgrave, Kester, Crowe, Gidley & Lagesen, Portland.
John R. Faust, Jr., and Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, Portland, filed a brief of amicus curiae for the Oregon Association of Defense Counsel.
Before Peterson, Chief Justice, and Lent, Linde, Campbell, Carson and Gillette, Justices.
Lent, J., retired September 30,1988.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The parties have stipulated that this case has been settled and that it be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Without expressing an opinion on the merits of this case, it is dismissed with prejudice and without costs.