Case Name: Lenzie Lee MURRAY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-08-01
Citations: 39 F. App'x 936
Docket Number: No. 02-6661
Parties: Lenzie Lee MURRAY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 39
Pages: 936–937

Head Matter:
Lenzie Lee MURRAY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 02-6661.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 25, 2002.
Decided Aug. 1, 2002.
Lenzie Lee Murray, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Richard Charles Kay, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Lenzie Lee Murray, Jr., appeals the district court's orders denying his motion for return of property pursuant to Fed. R.Crim.P. 41(e) and motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Murray v. United States, No. CA-01-2188-AMD (D. Md. filed Feb. 13, 2002 & entered Feb. 14, 2002; filed Feb. 19, 2002 & entered Feb. 20, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.