Case Name: Leonard SLOCUM, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2015-10-06
Citations: 471 S.W.3d 803
Docket Number: No. ED 102551
Parties: Leonard SLOCUM, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent.
Judges: -, Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Patricia L. Cohen, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 471
Pages: 803–804

Head Matter:
Leonard SLOCUM, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent.
No. ED 102551
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
Filed: October 6, 2015
Matthew W. Huckeby, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Movant/Appellant.
.Mary Highland Moore, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent/Respondent.
-, Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Patricia L. Cohen, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Leonard Slocum appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k); Burston v. State, 343 S.W.3d 691, 693 (MoApp.E.D. 2011). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however; provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. AH rule references are to Mo. R. Crím. P. 2014, unless otherwise indicated.