Case Name: Freddie Owen FELDER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-09-27
Citations: 828 So. 2d 409
Docket Number: No. 5D02-1947
Parties: Freddie Owen FELDER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: HARRIS and ORFINGER, R. B., JJ„ concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 828
Pages: 409–410

Head Matter:
Freddie Owen FELDER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D02-1947.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Sept. 27, 2002.
Freddie Owen Felder, Lake Butler, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

Opinion:
SAWAYA, J.
Freddie Owen Felder appeals the summary denial of his rule 3.800(a) motion in which he alleged a guideline scoresheet miscalculation apparent on the face of the record. Specifically, the guideline score-sheet indicates that 18 points were scored for community sanction violations, which would be correct if Felder had three community sanction violations. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.703(d)(17) (providing that six points are to be scored for each community sanction violation). However, Felder alleges that he only had one violation.
Without attaching any portion of the record to refute Felder's claim, the trial court denied Felder's motion, finding that the assessment of points on the scoresheet was proper. As explained in Moore v. State, 741 So.2d 577 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999), the burden is on the trial court to attach portions of the record refuting a defendant's rule 3.800(a) claim. In the instant case, Felder's allegations are facially sufficient and are not refuted. Therefore, the trial court's order is reversed and the case is remanded for the trial court to either attach portions of the record refuting Felder's claim or to grant the requested relief.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
HARRIS and ORFINGER, R. B., JJ" concur.
. Felder also claims that his sentence is illegal because his sentence of 82 months exceeds the statutory maximum of 60 months for a third degree felony. If the scoresheet calculation is correct, Felder's claim has no merit. See Mays v. State, 717 So.2d 515 (Fla. 1998) (holding that where the guideline sentence exceeds the statutory maximum, it is the guideline sentence and not the statutory maximum which controls). Obviously, if Felder is correct that too many points were assessed for the community control violations, his scoresheet will have to be corrected and a sentence imposed accordingly.