Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kirk L. LONEY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-04-25
Citations: 646 F. App'x 325
Docket Number: No. 15-7817
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kirk L. LONEY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 646
Pages: 325–326

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kirk L. LONEY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-7817.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 21, 2016.
Decided: April 25, 2016.
Kirk L, Loney, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Steven Dry, Stephen Wiley Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Michael Arlen Jagels, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Matthew Childs Ack-ley, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kirk L. Loney appeals from the district court's order construing his Fed.R,Civ.P. 60(b) motion as an unauthorized successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and dismissing it on that basis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Loney, Nos. 3:02-cr-000290-REP-1; 3:11-cv-0Q337-REP (E.D.Va. Sept. 10, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.