Case Name: Terry S. KING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-02-29
Citations: 267 F. App'x 301
Docket Number: No. 07-1880
Parties: Terry S. KING, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 267
Pages: 301–301

Head Matter:
Terry S. KING, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 07-1880.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 11, 2008.
Decided: Feb. 29, 2008.
Terry S. King, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Montgomery Shetterly, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, PC, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Terry King appeals the district court's orders adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation to grant summary judgment to Marriott International, Inc. on King's claim of retaliation under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. § 621-634 (2000), and on King's state law contract claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible eiTor. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See King v. Marriott Int'l, Inc., No. 9:05-cv-01774-PMD (D.S.C. Mar. 3, 2007), 520 F.Supp.2d 744 (D.S.C.2007), and 520 F.Supp.2d 748 (D.S.C.2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.