Case Name: Lance E. RUCK; Robert A. Cushing, Jr., Creditors-Appellants, and Kenneth R. Smoot, Creditor, v. Lynn Lewis TAVENNER, Trustee, Trustee-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-08-10
Citations: 194 F. App’x 96
Docket Number: No. 06-1554
Parties: Lance E. RUCK; Robert A. Cushing, Jr., Creditors—Appellants, and Kenneth R. Smoot, Creditor, v. Lynn Lewis TAVENNER, Trustee, Trustee—Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Bankruptcy Reporter
Volume: 352
Pages: 96–97

Head Matter:
Lance E. RUCK; Robert A. Cushing, Jr., Creditors—Appellants, and Kenneth R. Smoot, Creditor, v. Lynn Lewis TAVENNER, Trustee, Trustee—Appellee.
No. 06-1554.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 26, 2006.
Decided: Aug. 10, 2006.
Lance E. Ruck, Robert A. Cushing, Jr., Appellants Pro Se. Christopher Abram Jones, Leclair Ryan, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Lance E. Ruck and Robert A. Cushing, Jr., seek to appeal the district court's order affirming the bankruptcy court's order denying their motion for payment of administrative expenses. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.
Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court's final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Dir., Dep't of Corr., 434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (1960)).
The district court's order was entered on the docket on March 30, 2006. The notice of appeal was filed on May 4, 2006. Because Ruck and Cushing failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.