Case Name: Goodrich, administrator, against Pendleton
Court: New York Court of Chancery
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1818-10-06
Citations: 3 Johns. Ch. 520
Docket Number: 
Parties: Goodrich, administrator, against Pendleton.
Judges: 
Reporter: Johnson's Chancery Reports
Volume: 3
Pages: 520–521

Head Matter:
Goodrich, administrator, against Pendleton.
October 6th.
A plaintiff suing, in autre droit, is not responsible for costs, unless under spe» cial circumstances.
"The defendant is not entitled to security for costs from a non resident plaintiff, suing as administrators especially after a plea.
If the non-residence of the plaintiff appears on the face of the bill, and the defendant demurs, pleads, or takes any other step in the cause, or even prays for time to answer, it is a waiver of his right to security for costs.
MOTION by the defendant, that the plaintiff, who resides in the state of Georgia, may give security for costs, in 500 dollars, or other sum, sufficient to indemnify the defendant, who will, necessarily, be put to very considerable expense in the defence of the suit.
Higgs and Boyd, contra,
on the ground,- 1. That the plaintiff sues as administrator; 2.- That the defendant has already put in a plea of the statute of limitations, which has been argued and overruled, and the non-residence of the plaintiff appeared on the face of the bill. (Vide ante, p. 384. S. C.)

Opinion:
The Chancellor.
Both of the objections are well taken. The plaintiff, who sues ,® autre droit, is not responsible for costs, if he fails, except under special circumstances ; and he ought not to be obliged to enter into personal security, in the first instance. The defendant has, moreover, waived his right to such security by his plea. The rule is, that if the non-residence of the plaintiff appears, on the bill, the defendant waives his title to security for costs, if he takes any step in the cause, or even prays time to answer. (2 Vesey, 24. 10 Vesey, jun. 287.) In Long v. Tardy, (1 Johns. Ch. Rep. 202.) a demurrer by the defendant was held to be a waiver.
Motion denied.