Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Douglas Indelicato, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2000-09-28
Citations: 275 A.D.2d 674
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Douglas Indelicato, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 275
Pages: 674–674

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Douglas Indelicato, Appellant.
[713 NYS2d 349]

Opinion:
—Judgments, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Dominic Massaro, J.), rendered November 20, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, and convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the second degree, and sentencing him, ás a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 8 years, 1 year, and 7 years, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant has not established that the circumstance that another attorney in his counsel's firm had one year earlier represented a prosecution witness created a conflict of interest or deprived defendant of meaningful representation. Defendant's claim that the successive representations affected his counsel's conduct of the trial is unsupported by the record (see, People v Jordan, 83 NY2d 785; People v Perez, 70 NY2d 773). Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Williams, Ellerin, Wallach and Friedman, JJ.