Case Name: Jim Smart v. The State
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1930-03-19
Citations: 115 Tex. Crim. 147
Docket Number: No. 13160
Parties: Jim Smart v. The State.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Criminal Reports
Volume: 115
Pages: 147–149

Head Matter:
Jim Smart v. The State.
No. 13160.
Delivered March 19, 1930.
Rehearing granted April 30, 1930.
Reported in 27 S. W. (2d) 813.
The opinion states the case.
J. Lee Cearley, of Cisco, for appellant.
A. A. Dawson, State’s Attorney, of Austin, for the §tate.

Opinion:
MORROW, Presiding Judge.
The offense is burglary; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of three years.
There are no questions of law presented for review save the sufficiency of the evidence. A recital of the evidence is deemed unnecessary. The burglary was proved by the owner of the premises, and a part of the stolen property was found in the possession of the appellant. An accomplice testified, detailing the entire transaction and connecting the appellant with the commission of the offense, and the corroboration is adequate to support the conviction.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.