Case Name: EDISON FIXTURE COMPANY, INCORPORATED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. LOUIS POLOGRUTO, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1925-02-05
Citations: 3 N.J. Misc. 198
Docket Number: 
Parties: EDISON FIXTURE COMPANY, INCORPORATED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. LOUIS POLOGRUTO, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 3
Pages: 198–198

Head Matter:
EDISON FIXTURE COMPANY, INCORPORATED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. LOUIS POLOGRUTO, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.
Argued October 8, 1924
Decided February 5, 1925.
Before Justices Tbenchard, Mintuen and Lloyd.
For the appellant, Herman B. J. Weckstein.
Por the appellee, Thomas P. Gurley.

Opinion:
Pee 'Cueiam.
Our examination of the record discloses no. error justifying a reversal. This case was argued with Edison Fixture Co., Inc., v. Copoulos, No. 475, of the present term, but differs from that in a material matter.
Here there was evidence tending to show that the defendant could not read English, and was imposed upon bjr the plaintiff as to. the true terms and contents of the written contract and in respect to material and pertinent matters.
• This testimony furnishes support for the judgment for the defendant, which will be affirmed, with costs.