Case Name: UNITED AIRCRAFT PRODUCTS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellees, v. CRUZAN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1945-04-30
Citations: 43 Ohio Law Abs. 440
Docket Number: No. 1824
Parties: UNITED AIRCRAFT PRODUCTS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellees, v. CRUZAN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: NICHOLS, J., of the Seventh Appellate District, sitting by designation.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 43
Pages: 440–441

Head Matter:
UNITED AIRCRAFT PRODUCTS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellees, v. CRUZAN, Defendant-Appellant.
Ohio Appeals, Second District, Montgomery County.
No. 1824.
Decided April 30, 1945.
Joseph D. Chamberlain, Dayton, E. H. & W. B. Turner, Dayton, for plaintiff-appellee.
Gus W. Byttner, Dayton, Henry G. Dybvig, Dayton, for defendant-appellant.
NICHOLS, J., of the Seventh Appellate District, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
OPINION
BY THE COURT:
Submitted on application for rehearing.
No sufficient rea_son is set forth to require a rehearing on this appeal. In our original opinion although we confined our discussion to the principal and determinative question before us, we also said, on page seven, that "no error assigned is well made". The journal entry may be prepared to conform to our finding that no error assigned is established.
HORNBECK, P. J., GEIGER, J" and NICHOLS, J., concur.