Case Name: Thomas N. O'HARA, Appellant, v. PEOPLE OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1968-02-15
Citations: 390 F.2d 878
Docket Number: No. 21682
Parties: Thomas N. O’HARA, Appellant, v. PEOPLE OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 390
Pages: 878–878

Head Matter:
Thomas N. O’HARA, Appellant, v. PEOPLE OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Appellee.
No. 21682.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
Feb. 15, 1968.
Carl B. Shapiro (argued), San Anselmo, Cal., Vincent Hallinan, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.
Nelson Kempsky (argued), Deputy Atty. Gen., Thomas Lynch, Atty. Gen., Edsel W. Haws, Deputy Atty. Gen., Sacramento, Cal., for appellee.
Before BARNES and BROWNING, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The appeal from the district court's dismissal of appellant's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is affirmed for petitioner's failure to exhaust his state remedies within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2254.