Case Name: Madelaine Stein, Respondent, v. Gary S. Stein, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2004-05-11
Citations: 7 A.D.3d 325
Docket Number: 
Parties: Madelaine Stein, Respondent, v Gary S. Stein, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 7
Pages: 325–326

Head Matter:
Madelaine Stein, Respondent, v Gary S. Stein, Appellant.
[775 NYS2d 850]

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura Visitacion-Lewis, J.), entered January 17, 2003, which granted plaintiff pendente relief in a matrimonial action, and order, same court and Justice, entered October 3, 2003, which denied defendant's motion for a downward modification, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Defendant fails to show either exigent circumstances or a failure by the motion court to properly consider the factors specified in Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (6), § 237 (a) and § 240 (1-b) (c) and (f). His remedy for any perceived inequities in the award is a prompt trial (see Anonymous v Anonymous, 241 AD2d 353 [1997]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Sullivan and Marlow, JJ.