Case Name: The STATE of Texas, Appellant, v. Charles Franklin CONDRAN, Appellee
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1998-10-07
Citations: 977 S.W.2d 144
Docket Number: Nos. 1152-97, 1153-97
Parties: The STATE of Texas, Appellant, v. Charles Franklin CONDRAN, Appellee.
Judges: HOLLAND, J., not participating.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 977
Pages: 144–147

Head Matter:
The STATE of Texas, Appellant, v. Charles Franklin CONDRAN, Appellee.
Nos. 1152-97, 1153-97.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.
Oct. 7, 1998.
Robert N. Udashen, Dallas, for appellant.
Chris Oldner, Assistant District Attorney, McKinney, Matthew Paul, State’s Attorney, Austin, for State.

Opinion:
OPINION ON APPELLEE'S PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
PER CURIAM.
Appellee filed an application for writ of habeas corpus contending he was entitled to discharge because he was indicted outside the "next term of court" as set out in Art. 32.01, V.A.C.C.P. After a hearing, the trial judge ordered the indictment dismissed with prejudice. The State appealed and the court of appeals reversed the trial court's order dismissing the indictment against appellee and remanded the causes for trial. State v. Condran, 951 S.W.2d 178 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1997). We granted review to determine the correctness of that decision.
However, after carefully considering the questions for review and briefs before us, we find that our decision to grant appellee's petitions for discretionary review was improvident. Accordingly, the petitions for discretionary review are dismissed.
HOLLAND, J., not participating.