Case Name: Eugene Walker v. The State
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1929-11-14
Citations: 114 Tex. Crim. 479
Docket Number: No. 13088
Parties: Eugene Walker v. The State.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Criminal Reports
Volume: 114
Pages: 479–482

Head Matter:
Eugene Walker v. The State.
No. 13088.
Delivered November 14, 1929.
Rehearing denied January 15, 1930.
Second motion for rehearing denied February 5, 1930.
Reported in 23 S. W. (2d) 380.
The opinion states the case.
J. S. Grisham of Eastland, for appellant.
A. A. Dawson of Canton, State’s Attorney, for the State.

Opinion:
HAWKINS, Judge.
Conviction is for burglary, punishment being two years in the penitentiary.
No statement of facts accompanies the record. A bill of exception complains of the admission of an officer's testimony that there was found in rooms occupied by appellant and his wife certain property later identified by E. J. Robinson as having been stolen from his store about the date alleged in the indictment, the objection being that it had not been shown there was a valid search warrant nor affidavit authorizing the issuance of the warrant. The bill is confusing; it is difficult to determine therefrom the exact status of the matter. However, even if it presents error it is impossible for us to appraise the gravity of it in the absence of the facts. They might present a case not calling for reversal even if an error was committed regarding the matter camplained of. The bill of exception is not sufficiently comprehensive to negative such a condition.
Under the circumstances we must affirm the judgment and it is so ordered.
Affirmed.