Case Name: Farmers' High Line Canal and Reservoir Co. et al. v. Wolff et al.
Court: Colorado Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Colorado
Decision Date: 1912-04
Citations: 22 Colo. App. 270
Docket Number: No. 3444
Parties: Farmers’ High Line Canal and Reservoir Co. et al. v. Wolff et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Colorado Court of Appeals Reports
Volume: 22
Pages: 270–271

Head Matter:
[No. 3444.]
Farmers’ High Line Canal and Reservoir Co. et al. v. Wolff et al.
Motion to remand denied on authority ■ of Monte Vista Canal Co. v. Centennial Irrigation Co., post.
Appeal from Denver District Court. Hon. George W. Allen, Judge.
Motion to remand denied.
Mr. C. B. Whiteord, Mr. Henry E. May, for appellants.
Messrs. Thomas & Thomas, Mr. John R. Smith, for appellees.

Opinion:
King, J.,
delivered the opinion of the court.
Motion is made to remand.this cause to the supreme court for the reason that the decision necessarily relates to or involves a freehold. The judgment appealed from was rendered by the district court in a statutory proceeding for permission to change the point of diversion of decreed water-rights. The facts and conditions of this cause, so far as material in considering this motion, are so nearly the same as in Monte Vista Canal Co. et al. v. Centennial Irrigating Ditch Co., in which opinion was handed down at this term, that the reasons and con elusions therein announced are controlling, and under that authority the motion herein to remand will he denied.