Case Name: Earnest TROTMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-01-25
Citations: 545 So. 2d 890
Docket Number: No. 87-2991
Parties: Earnest TROTMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 545
Pages: 890–891

Head Matter:
Earnest TROTMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 87-2991.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jan. 25, 1989.
On Rehearing March 22, 1989.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Anthony Calvello, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Alfonso M. Saldana, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
HERSEY, Chief Judge.
We reverse one of appellant's two convictions of first-degree burglary and we reverse the sentence and remand for resen-tencing.
Trotman was charged with and found guilty of two counts of first-degree burglary. One count involved an assault and the other a battery. Regardless, there was but one entry and thus the dual convictions cannot stand. Hawkins v. State, 436 So.2d 44 (Fla.1983).
The sentence imposed constituted an upward departure from the guidelines' recommended range and consequently was required to be supported by contemporaneous written reasons for departure. State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985), receded from in part on other grounds, Wilkerson v. State, 513 So.2d 664 (Fla.1987). See also Schmeisser v. State, 527 So.2d 276 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); State v. Daughtry, 487 So.2d 1184 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); § 921.001(6), Fla.Stat. (1987); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701 b.6. and d.ll. There being none, resentencing is required.
By agreement of the parties, we strike the imposition of costs.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; REMANDED.
GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., concur.