Case Name: STATE v. RAX HUNT
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 1927-03-02
Citations: 193 N.C. 833
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE v. RAX HUNT.
Judges: 
Reporter: North Carolina Reports
Volume: 193
Pages: 833–834

Head Matter:
STATE v. RAX HUNT.
(Filed 2 March, 1927.)
Appeal by defendant from Sinclair, J., at March Term, 1926, of Lee.
Criminal prosecution tried upon an indictment charging the defendant with manufacturing spirituous liquors in violation of law.
Prom an adverse verdict and judgment of eighteen months on the roads the defendant appeals, assigning errors.
Attorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.
Hoyle & Hoyle for defendant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We are unable to say, from the record as presented, that the irregularities in the selection of the juries, grand and petit, of which the defendant complains, were such as could not be waived, but may now be invoked and brought to the aid of the defendant on his motion in arrest of judgment.
The defendant was not represented by counsel at the trial, and his appeal is from the court's refusal to arrest the judgment. The irregularities were not sufficient to vitiate the trial.
Affirmed.