Case Name: Pensacola Shipbuilding Co., et al., v. State, for the Use and Benefit of A. Bentley & Sons Co.
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1933-12-13
Citations: 113 Fla. 253
Docket Number: 
Parties: Pensacola Shipbuilding Co., et al., v. State, for the Use and Benefit of A. Bentley & Sons Co.
Judges: 
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 113
Pages: 253–254

Head Matter:
Pensacola Shipbuilding Co., et al., v. State, for the Use and Benefit of A. Bentley & Sons Co.
151 So. 392.
Division B.
Opinion Filed December 13, 1933.
Robert H. Anderson, for Plaintiffs in Error;
L’Engle & Shands, for Defendant in Error.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This Cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is' no error in the said judgment; it is therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Brown, J., absent and not participating because of illness.