Case Name: Young v. Florida et al.; Toledo Police Patrolman's Assn., Local 10, I. U. P. A., et al. v. City of Toledo et al., In re Jaffer, Wrenn v. United States et al.; Camoscio v. The Patriot Ledger et al.; Bettistea v. Michigan; Porter v. Pennsylvania; Sisco v. County of Los Angeles et al.; Draper v. Ohio; Schlicher v. Davies, Secretary, Kansas Department of Corrections, et al.; McColpin v. Stephan, In re Kirschenhunter
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1990-12-10
Citations: 498 U.S. 1017
Docket Number: No. 89-7683; No. 90-346; No. 90-365; No. 90-399; No. 90-458; No. 90-5073; No. 90-5101; No. 90-5266; No. 90-5454; No. 90-5606; No. 90-5632; No. 90-5816
Parties: Young v. Florida et al., Toledo Police Patrolman’s Assn., Local 10, I. U. P. A., et al. v. City of Toledo et al., In re Jaffer, Wrenn v. United States et al., Camoscio v. The Patriot Ledger et al., Bettistea v. Michigan, Porter v. Pennsylvania, Sisco v. County of Los Angeles et al., Draper v. Ohio, Schlicher v. Davies, Secretary, Kansas Department of Corrections, et al., McColpin v. Stephan, In re Kirschenhunter,
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 498
Pages: 1017–1017

Head Matter:
No. 89-7683.
No. 90-346.
No. 90-365.
No. 90-399.
No. 90-458.
No. 90-5073.
No. 90-5101.
No. 90-5266.
No. 90-5454.
No. 90-5606.
No. 90-5632.
No. 90-5816.
Young v. Florida et al., Toledo Police Patrolman’s Assn., Local 10, I. U. P. A., et al. v. City of Toledo et al., In re Jaffer, Wrenn v. United States et al., Camoscio v. The Patriot Ledger et al., Bettistea v. Michigan, Porter v. Pennsylvania, Sisco v. County of Los Angeles et al., Draper v. Ohio, Schlicher v. Davies, Secretary, Kansas Department of Corrections, et al., McColpin v. Stephan, In re Kirschenhunter,

Opinion:
ante, p. 919;
ante, p. 920;
ante, p. 937;
ante, p. 921;
ante, p. 942;
ante, p. 942;
ante, p. 925;
ante, p. 922;
ante, p. 916;
ante, p. 945;
ante, p. 946; and
ante, p. 937. Petitions for rehearing denied.