Case Name: D. O. MENASCO, Plaintiff in Error, v. F. G. HAWKINS, Defendant in Error
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1925-03-24
Citations: 4 F.2d 1020
Docket Number: No. 4476
Parties: D. O. MENASCO, Plaintiff in Error, v. F. G. HAWKINS, Defendant in Error.
Judges: Before WALKER, BRYAN, and FOSTER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 4
Pages: 1020–1020

Head Matter:
D. O. MENASCO, Plaintiff in Error, v. F. G. HAWKINS, Defendant in Error.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 24, 1925.)
No. 4476.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Mississippi, Edwin R: Holmes, Judge.
Geo. J. Leftwich, of Aberdeen, Miss. (Leftwich & Tubb and Geo. J. Leftwich, all of Aberdeen, Miss., and C. H. King and A. B. Galloway, both of Memphis, Tenn., on the brief), for plaintiff in error. Geo. T. Mitchell and Chas. S. Mitchell, both of Tupelo, Miss., and L. M. Smith, of Memphis, Tenn., for defendant in error.
Before WALKER, BRYAN, and FOSTER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This was an action by the plaintiff in error for alleged malicious prosecution. Nothing is presented for review, except rulings of the court on objections to evidence. We think that each of those rulings obviously is either so free from error or nonprejudicial that no more need be said than that none of them involved reversible error. The judgment is affirmed.