Case Name: Henry PATINO, et al., Appellants, v. DADE COUNTY CHAPTER OF the NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR WOMEN, et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-03-26
Citations: 576 So. 2d 912
Docket Number: Nos. 90-1034, 90-1168
Parties: Henry PATINO, et al., Appellants, v. DADE COUNTY CHAPTER OF the NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR WOMEN, et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and LEVY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 576
Pages: 912–913

Head Matter:
Henry PATINO, et al., Appellants, v. DADE COUNTY CHAPTER OF the NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR WOMEN, et al., Appellees.
Nos. 90-1034, 90-1168.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 26, 1991.
Craig S. Bulkeley, Marion Edwyn Harrison, Miami, DiGiulian & DiChiara, and John B. DiChiara, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.
Pamela A. Chamberlin, Miami, for appel-lees.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and LEVY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The record demonstrates that the trial court abused its discretion in entering the injunction against the appellants herein when there was an absence of evidence to connect these appellants with the acts sought to be enjoined. Accordingly, the injunction, to the extent that it relates to these appellants, must be reversed.
Reversed.
SCHWARTZ, C.J., and LEVY, J., concur.