Case Name: Dean Eric PALMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. E.F. THOMPSON, INC., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-04-07
Citations: 421 F. App'x 314
Docket Number: No. 10-1838
Parties: Dean Eric PALMER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. E.F. THOMPSON, INC., Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 421
Pages: 314–314

Head Matter:
Dean Eric PALMER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. E.F. THOMPSON, INC., Defendant—Appellee.
No. 10-1838.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 31, 2010.
Decided: April 7, 2011.
Dean Eric Palmer, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Blaine Martin, McGuire, Woods, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed in part; vacated and remanded in pai't by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this cix-cuit.
PER CURIAM:
Dean Ex-ic Palmer appeals the district court's order dismissing this employment discrimination action for failure to state a claim. With respect to Palmex-'s claim of race discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, we conclude that Palmer set fox-th facts sufficient to state a prima facie claim of discriminatory discharge. See Miles v. Dell, Inc., 429 F.3d 480, 486-87 & n. 3 (4th Cir.2005). We, of coxxrse, offer no opinion on whether plaintiff presents any issue of triable fact. We accordingly vacate that portioix of the district court's order related to the Title VII claim and remand for further proceedings.
With respect to the claim of a violation of the American's with Disabilities Act, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Palmer v. E.F. Thompson, Inc., No. 2:10-cv-00051-TEM (E.D. Va. June 23, 2010).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED AND REMANDED IN PART.