Case Name: Dayton Bar Association v. Hanaghan
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1992-09-02
Citations: 64 Ohio St. 3d 457
Docket Number: No. 92-834
Parties: Dayton Bar Association v. Hanaghan.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 64
Pages: 457–459

Head Matter:
Dayton Bar Association v. Hanaghan.
[Cite as Dayton Bar Assn. v. Hanaghan (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 457.]
(No. 92-834
Submitted June 2, 1992
Decided September 2, 1992.)
Bieser, Greer & Landis and Howard P. Krisher, for relator.
Charles W. Kettlewell, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We agree with the board's findings and recommendation. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.