Case Name: David FROST, Claimant/Appellant, v. TREASURER OF the STATE of Missouri, as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Additional Party/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2010-01-26
Citations: 302 S.W.3d 250
Docket Number: No. ED 93236
Parties: David FROST, Claimant/Appellant, v. TREASURER OF the STATE of Missouri, as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Additional Party/Respondent.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 302
Pages: 250–251

Head Matter:
David FROST, Claimant/Appellant, v. TREASURER OF the STATE of Missouri, as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Additional Party/Respondent.
No. ED 93236.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Jan. 26, 2010.
Cynthia M. Hennessey, The Law Offices of Cynthia M. Hennessey, LLC, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Laura C. Wagener, Assistant Attorney General, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Claimant appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, affirming the award of the Administrative Law Judge. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. No error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished, for their information only, with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our order affirm ing the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).