Case Name: Semanthe Vidrine LANDRENEAU et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HUMBLE OIL & REFINING CO. et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1968-05-03
Citations: 210 So. 2d 345
Docket Number: No. 2329
Parties: Semanthe Vidrine LANDRENEAU et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HUMBLE OIL & REFINING CO. et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before FRUGÉ, SAVOY and CUL-PEPPER, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 210
Pages: 345–345

Head Matter:
Semanthe Vidrine LANDRENEAU et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HUMBLE OIL & REFINING CO. et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 2329.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Third Circuit.
May 3, 1968.
Donald Soileau, Mamou, for plaintiff-appellant.
W. J. McAnelly, Jr., New Orleans, Chaffe, McCall, Phillips, Burke, Toler & Hopkins, by C. Manly Horton, Jr., New Orleans, and Bailey & Mouton, by George J. Bailey, Lafayette, and Arthur Aitkens, by C. Manly Horton, Jr., New Orleans, for defendants-appellees.
Before FRUGÉ, SAVOY and CUL-PEPPER, JJ.

Opinion:
SAVOY, Judge.
For the reasons set forth in the case of Fontenot v. Humble Oil & Refining Co. et al., La.App., 210 So.2d 340, handed down this date, the judgment of the district court in the instant case is affirmed at appellant's costs.
Affirmed.