Case Name: TESAR v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1926-03-31
Citations: 281 S.W. 1065
Docket Number: No. 10068
Parties: TESAR v. STATE.
Judges: MORROW, P. J., absent.
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 281
Pages: 1065–1065

Head Matter:
TESAR v. STATE.
(No. 10068.)
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
March 31, 1926.)
E. O. Northcutt, of Amarillo, for appellant.
Sam D. Stinson, State’s Atty., of Austin, and Robt. M. Lyles, Asst. State’s Atty., of Groesbeck, for the State.

Opinion:
HAWKINS, J.
Conviction is for possessing intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale. Punishment is one and one-half years in the penitentiary.
The record contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exception. Objections to the court's charge are based on the Claim that the evidence raised no issue authorizing certain instructions. Manifestly, without having the facts .before us, we are in no position tp review this matter. The 'same is true of the special charges refused. In the absence of the facts proven, we cannot determine whether the requested charges were appropriate.
The judgment is affirmed.
MORROW, P. J., absent.