Case Name: Charles W. ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald D. EVANS; United States Patent & Trademark Office, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-12-23
Citations: 117 F. App'x 276
Docket Number: No. 04-2049
Parties: Charles W. ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald D. EVANS; United States Patent & Trademark Office, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 117
Pages: 276–277

Head Matter:
Charles W. ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald D. EVANS; United States Patent & Trademark Office, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 04-2049.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 3, 2004.
Decided Dec. 23, 2004.
Charles W. Anderson, Appellant pro se. Dennis Carl Barghaan, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Charles W. Anderson appeals district court orders granting the Appellees' motion to dismiss the constitutional claims and the retaliation claim and the motion for summary judgment with respect to Anderson's Title VII and ADEA claims and denying his motion for reconsideration under Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. We have reviewed the record and the district court's findings and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Anderson v. Evans, No. CA-04-211-A (E.D. Va. filed June 18, 2004 & entered June 22, 2004 & June 29, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED