Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Darlin Isou MUNOZ-OYUELA, Defendant-Appellant; United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Darlin Esau Oyuela-Munos, also known as Darlin Isou Munoz-Oyuela, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-04-19
Citations: 423 F. App'x 371
Docket Number: Nos. 10-40244, 10-40291
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Darlin Isou MUNOZ-OYUELA, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Darlin Esau Oyuela-Munos, also known as Darlin Isou Munoz-Oyuela, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 423
Pages: 371–372

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Darlin Isou MUNOZ-OYUELA, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Darlin Esau Oyuela-Munos, also known as Darlin Isou Munoz-Oyuela, Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 10-40244, 10-40291
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 19, 2011.
James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Kimberly S. Keller, Keller Law Firm, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Darlin Isou Munoz-Oyuela has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Munoz-Oyuela has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeals present no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEALS ARE DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.