Case Name: NEWSOME v. NORTH CAROLINA
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1963-10-14
Citations: 375 U.S. 21
Docket Number: No. 11
Parties: NEWSOME v. NORTH CAROLINA.
Judges: Mr. Justice Harlan, for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Pickelsimer v. Wainwright, ante, p. 3, would have withheld disposition of this petition for certiorari until the disposition, after argument, of that case.
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 375
Pages: 21–21

Head Matter:
NEWSOME v. NORTH CAROLINA.
No. 11,
Misc.
Decided October 14, 1963.
Petitioner pro se.
Thomas Wade Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, and Ralph Moody, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of North Carolina for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U. S. 335.
Mr. Justice Harlan, for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Pickelsimer v. Wainwright, ante, p. 3, would have withheld disposition of this petition for certiorari until the disposition, after argument, of that case.