Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Appellant, v. JAMES N. SCHMITZ, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1982-02-08
Citations: 55 Or. App. 1028
Docket Number: No. 81-28 and 81-29, CA A21890
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Appellant, v. JAMES N. SCHMITZ, Respondent.
Judges: Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Roberts and Young, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 55
Pages: 1028–1028

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted January 15,
reversed and remanded for trial February 8, 1982
STATE OF OREGON, Appellant, v. JAMES N. SCHMITZ, Respondent.
(No. 81-28 and 81-29, CA A21890)
639 P2d 1317
Thomas H. Denney, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and William F. Gary, Solicitor General, Salem.
Gregory J. Leineweber, St. Helens, waived appearance for respondent.
Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Roberts and Young, Judges.
PER CURIAM.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The trial court's determination that there were no exigent circumstances justifying the warrantless search in this case was erroneous. Reversed and remanded for trial.