Case Name: Wilson THOMAS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles A. DANIELS, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-03-24
Citations: 320 F. App'x 554
Docket Number: No. 07-35640
Parties: Wilson THOMAS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles A. DANIELS, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 320
Pages: 554–555

Head Matter:
Wilson THOMAS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles A. DANIELS, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 07-35640.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 18, 2009.
Filed March 24, 2009.
Wilson Thomas, Taft, CA, pro se.
Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Federal prisoner Wilson Thomas appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing his petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, and from the district court's order denying his motion to reconsider. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 2258, and we affirm.
Thomas contends that, although the district court denied his petition on res judi-cata grounds, he is entitled to relief in light of House v. Bell, 547 U.S. 518, 126 S.Ct. 2064, 165 L.Ed.2d 1 (2006). This contention is without merit.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.