Case Name: MIZELL & WALKER v. DENNIS SIMMONS and W. J. HARDISON
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 1880-01
Citations: 82 N.C. 1
Docket Number: 
Parties: MIZELL & WALKER v. DENNIS SIMMONS and W. J. HARDISON.
Judges: 
Reporter: North Carolina Reports
Volume: 82
Pages: 1–2

Head Matter:
MIZELL & WALKER v. DENNIS SIMMONS and W. J. HARDISON.
Petition to Rehear — Affirmance of Judgment.
The decision in Mizellv. Simmons, as reported in 79 N. C., 182, is affirmed, and must stand as the judgment of this court.
(Watson v. Dodd, 72 N. C., 240, cited and approved.)
Petition by defendants to Rehear heard at January Term, 1880, of The Supreme Court.
Messrs. P. B. Winston, Sr., and Mullen & Moore for plaintiffs-;
Messrs. Gilliam & Gatling and Reade, Bushee & Bushee for. defendants.

Opinion:
Ashe, J.
This is a petition to rehear and reverse the judgment rendered in this court in the case of Mizell v. Simmons, at its June term, 1878, and reported in 79 N. C., 182.
In the case of Watson v. Dodd, 72 N. C., 240, which, like this, was a petition to rehear, Chief Justice PeaesoN in delivering the opinion of the court said : " The weightiest considerations make it the duty of the court to adhere to their decisions. No case ought to be reversed upon petition to rehear unless it was decided hastily and some material point ivas overlooked, or some direct authority was not called to the attention of the court." And to the same effect are the cases of Haywood v. Daves, 81 N. C., 8; Devereux v. Devereux, Ibid., 12.
This case seems to have been considered in 1878, when -before this court, with very great care, deliberation and labor, from the numerous authorities cited and the able and well considered opinions delivered. But i.t does not appear that any material point was then overlooked or that any important authority was then omitted which is now brought to the attention .of .the court. So far from that being the case, the same authorities then cited are now relied upon, and we are unable to discover any error in the decision then made. We are, therefore, of the opinion that the decision made in this case at the June term, 1878, shall stand as the judgment of this court.
No .error. ' Affirmed.