Case Name: WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP. v. BOARD OF PROPERTY ASSESSMENT, APPEALS AND REVIEW OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY v. The BOROUGH OF CHURCHILL, Woodland Hills School District, et al. Petition of: WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP. (Two Cases); The BOROUGH OF CHURCHILL, et al. v. BOARD OF PROPERTY ASSESSMENT, APPEALS AND REVIEW OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP., et al. Petition of: The BOROUGH OF CHURCHILL, Woodland Hills School District, and the County of Allegheny, Cross-Petitioners
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1991-08-23
Citations: 528 Pa. 182
Docket Number: Appeal No. 206 W.D. Allocatur Docket 1991
Parties: WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP. v. BOARD OF PROPERTY ASSESSMENT, APPEALS AND REVIEW OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY v. The BOROUGH OF CHURCHILL, Woodland Hills School District, et al. Petition of: WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP. (Two Cases). The BOROUGH OF CHURCHILL, et al. v. BOARD OF PROPERTY ASSESSMENT, APPEALS AND REVIEW OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP., et al. Petition of: The BOROUGH OF CHURCHILL, Woodland Hills School District, and the County of Allegheny, Cross-Petitioners.
Judges: 
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 528
Pages: 182–183

Head Matter:
595 A.2d 1145
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP. v. BOARD OF PROPERTY ASSESSMENT, APPEALS AND REVIEW OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY v. The BOROUGH OF CHURCHILL, Woodland Hills School District, et al. Petition of: WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP. (Two Cases). The BOROUGH OF CHURCHILL, et al. v. BOARD OF PROPERTY ASSESSMENT, APPEALS AND REVIEW OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP., et al. Petition of: The BOROUGH OF CHURCHILL, Woodland Hills School District, and the County of Allegheny, Cross-Petitioners.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Aug. 23, 1991.

Opinion:
ORDER
Petition for Allowance of Appeal granted, No. 79 W.D. Appeal Docket 1991.
Cross-petition for allowance of appeal granted, No. 80 W.D. Appeal Docket 1991 limited to:
"Whether the Commonwealth Court erred in reversing the trial court's finding as to the common level ratio and remanding for further consideration of that issue."