Case Name: Robert ADJEI-KYEM, a/k/a Kofi Adjei-Kyem, a/k/a James Kusi-Kyem, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-06-21
Citations: 436 F. App'x 224
Docket Number: No. 11-1085
Parties: Robert ADJEI-KYEM, a/k/a Kofi Adjei-Kyem, a/k/a James Kusi-Kyem, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 436
Pages: 224–224

Head Matter:
Robert ADJEI-KYEM, a/k/a Kofi Adjei-Kyem, a/k/a James Kusi-Kyem, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 11-1085.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 7, 2011.
Decided: June 21, 2011.
Robert Adjei-Kyem, Petitioner Pro Se. Geoffrey Forney, William Charles Pea-chey, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Robert Adjei-Kyem, a native and citizen of Ghana, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("Board") upholding the immigration judge's denial of his motion for a continuance and denying his motion to remand. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion. See Lendo v. Gonzales, 493 F.3d 439, 441 (4th Cir.2007) (setting forth standard of review for the denial of a motion for a continuance); Onyeme v. INS, 146 F.3d 227, 234 (4th Cir.1998) (setting forth standard of review for the denial of a motion to remand). We therefore uphold the denial of Adjei-Kyem's motions for the reasons stated by the Board, see In re Adjei-Kyem (B.I.A. Dec. 29, 2010), and- deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.
In his informal brief before this court, Adjei-Kyem has failed to raise any challenges to the denial of his requests for cancellation of removal or voluntary departure. He has therefore waived appellate review of these claims. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b) ("The court will limit its review to the issues raised in the informal brief."); Ngarurih v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 182, 189 n. 7 (4th Cir.2004).