Case Name: Mark Thomas SWIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-10-02
Citations: 380 S.W.3d 651
Docket Number: No. ED 97898
Parties: Mark Thomas SWIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., C.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 380
Pages: 651–651

Head Matter:
Mark Thomas SWIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 97898.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Oct. 2, 2012.
Amanda P. Faerber, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Foster, Attorney General, Mary H. Moore, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., C.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
Mark T. Swier appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying Swier's request for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).