Case Name: MUBEN-LAMAR, L.P., etc., Petitioner, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2001-06-28
Citations: 789 So. 2d 337
Docket Number: No. SC00-1111
Parties: MUBEN-LAMAR, L.P., etc., Petitioner, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Respondent.
Judges: WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 789
Pages: 337–338

Head Matter:
MUBEN-LAMAR, L.P., etc., Petitioner, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Respondent.
No. SC00-1111.
Supreme Court of Florida.
June 28, 2001.
Larry E. Levy, Tallahassee, FL, and William J. Deas, Jacksonville, FL, for Petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Jeffrey M. Dikman, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, FL, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted for review Muben-Lamar, L.P. v. Department of Revenue, 763 So.2d 1209 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), on the basis of express and direct conflict with Kuro, Inc. v. State Department of Revenue, 713 So.2d 1021 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we determine that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss review of this cause.
It is so ordered.
WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.