Case Name: Erwin PEAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Glen CRAIG; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-04-16
Citations: 32 F. App'x 960
Docket Number: No. 01-16316; D.C. No. CV-99-00195-LKK (DAD)
Parties: Erwin PEAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Glen CRAIG; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 32
Pages: 960–961

Head Matter:
Erwin PEAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Glen CRAIG; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 01-16316.
D.C. No. CV-99-00195-LKK (DAD).
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 8, 2002.
Decided April 16, 2002.
Before BROWNING, KLEINFELD, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument and denies Peay's request for oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Erwin Peay appeals pro se the district court's judgment for defendants following a jury trial in his action alleging that defendants used excessive force against him in violation of the Fourth Amendment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
We are unable to review Peay's contentions regarding the jury verdict because Peay failed to provide copies of the trial transcripts. See Fed. R.App. P. 10(b)(2); Syncom Capital Corp. v. Wade, 924 F.2d 167, 169 (9th Cir.1991) (per curiam).
The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Peay's motion for appointment of counsel because Peay failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances. See Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir.1991).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.