Case Name: GEORGE T. COULTER v. EDELBERT EUGENE SCHOFIELD, DEFENDANT; THE BANK OF HAWAII, LIMITED, GARNISHEE
Court: Supreme Court of the Territory of Hawaii
Jurisdiction: Hawaii
Decision Date: 1932-03-05
Citations: 32 Haw. 309
Docket Number: No. 2030
Parties: GEORGE T. COULTER v. EDELBERT EUGENE SCHOFIELD, DEFENDANT; THE BANK OF HAWAII, LIMITED, GARNISHEE.
Judges: Perry, C. J., Banks and Parsons, JJ.
Reporter: Hawaii Reports
Volume: 32
Pages: 309–309

Head Matter:
GEORGE T. COULTER v. EDELBERT EUGENE SCHOFIELD, DEFENDANT; THE BANK OF HAWAII, LIMITED, GARNISHEE.
No. 2030.
Argued November 25, 1931.
Decided March 5, 1932.
Perry, C. J., Banks and Parsons, JJ.
J. R. Cades (Smith & Wild on the briefs) for plaintiff.
H. E. Stafford (R. J. O’Brien on the brief) for defendant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The questions of law presented by the exceptions in this ease are the same as those presented by the exceptions in case No. 2029, entitled George T. Coulter v. Emma McCord Schofield, heretofore decided by this court, as appears in its opinion on page 296, ante.
Upon authority of the foregoing opinion of the court in case No. 2029 the exceptions in case No. 2030 are sustained, the judgment therein is set aside and a new trial is granted, the chief justice dissenting as in case No. 2029.