Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. LACRECIA MICHELLE HAL, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1999-02-17
Citations: 158 Or. App. 517
Docket Number: 96-12-39650; CA A99004
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. LACRECIA MICHELLE HAL, Appellant.
Judges: Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Haselton and Wollheim, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 158
Pages: 517–518

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted November 20, 1998,
appeal dismissed February 17, 1999
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. LACRECIA MICHELLE HAL, Appellant.
(96-12-39650; CA A99004)
974 P2d 793
Andy Simrin, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was David E. Groom, Public Defender.
Jonathan H. Fussner, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.
Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Haselton and Wollheim, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction, challenging only the trial court's imposition of a probation sentence consecutive to a sentence that included post-prison supervision. We heard oral argument and took the case under advisement. In the meantime, defendant filed a motion in the trial court to modify the judgment to correct an error in the sentence, pursuant to ORS 138.083. The trial court allowed the motion, granting defendant the same relief that she pursues in this appeal. The appeal is therefore moot and, on that ground, is dismissed.
Appeal dismissed.