Case Name: Teletia TAYLOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OAK FOREST HEALTH AND REHABILITATION, LLC; Ardent Health and Rehabilitation Co.; Beystone Health and Rehabilitation Co.; Sanstone Health and Rehabilitation; United Healthcare Services, Incorporated, d/b/a United Healthcare Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-01-26
Citations: 590 F. App'x 254
Docket Number: No. 14-1992
Parties: Teletia TAYLOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OAK FOREST HEALTH AND REHABILITATION, LLC; Ardent Health and Rehabilitation Co.; Beystone Health and Rehabilitation Co.; Sanstone Health and Rehabilitation; United Healthcare Services, Incorporated, d/b/a United Healthcare Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 590
Pages: 254–254

Head Matter:
Teletia TAYLOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OAK FOREST HEALTH AND REHABILITATION, LLC; Ardent Health and Rehabilitation Co.; Beystone Health and Rehabilitation Co.; Sanstone Health and Rehabilitation; United Healthcare Services, Incorporated, d/b/a United Healthcare Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 14-1992.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 22, 2015.
Decided: Jan. 26, 2015.
Teletia Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Patrick McQuillan Aul, Matthew Justin Gray, Young Moore & Henderson, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina; Daniel Alter, Shari Ger-son, Jeffrey T. Kuntz, Garyrobinson, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, Florida; Donald Joseph O’Brien, III, Jennifer Kay Van Zant, Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard LLP, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Teletia Taylor appeals the district court's order dismissing her complaint as a sanction for her failures to comply with court orders. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Taylor v. Oak Forest Health & Rehab., LLC, No. 1:11-cv-00471-CCE-LPA (M.D.N.C. Sept. 15, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.