Case Name: Ethel BROOKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-04-29
Citations: 425 F. App'x 834
Docket Number: No. 10-15308
Parties: Ethel BROOKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 425
Pages: 834–834

Head Matter:
Ethel BROOKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 10-15308
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
April 29, 2011.
Patrick M. Connolly, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Philip Wade Savrin, Freeman, Mathis & Gary, LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Defendants Appellee.
Before TJOFLAT, BARKETT and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The district court, in its order of October 13, 2010, dismissed the plaintiffs complaint for failure to state a claim for relief because the complaint was not brought within the two-year limitations period contained in the insurance policy defendant issued plaintiff. Plaintiff now appeals. We find no error in the court's rationale for dismissing the complaint. The court's judgment is therefore
AFFIRMED.