Case Name: In the Matter of Norman E. Roth et al., Appellants, v. City of Syracuse et al., Respondents. (And Other Proceedings.)
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2011-09-08
Citations: 17 N.Y.3d 833
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Norman E. Roth et al., Appellants, v City of Syracuse et al., Respondents. (And Other Proceedings.)
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 17
Pages: 833–833

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Norman E. Roth et al., Appellants, v City of Syracuse et al., Respondents. (And Other Proceedings.)
Submitted May 31, 2011;
decided September 8, 2011

Opinion:
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceedings within the meaning of the Constitution (see Burke v Crosson, 85 NY2d 10, 18 n 5 [1995]).