Case Name: Timothy GALLAGHER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2010-06-15
Citations: 313 S.W.3d 708
Docket Number: No. ED 93698
Parties: Timothy GALLAGHER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before: KURT S. ODENWALD, P.J., GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 313
Pages: 708–709

Head Matter:
Timothy GALLAGHER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 93698.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
June 15, 2010.
Gwenda Renee’ Robinson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Mary H. Moore, Jefferson City, MO, for appellee.
Before: KURT S. ODENWALD, P.J., GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Timothy Gallagher (Movant) appeals from the motion court's judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his amended Motion under Rule 24.035 to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence (Amended Motion.) We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2010, unless otherwise indicated.