Case Name: Albert Zaidenberg, Respondent, v. Benjamin H. Roth et al., Doing Business as B. H. Roth & Co., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1944-05-01
Citations: 267 A.D. 990
Docket Number: 
Parties: Albert Zaidenberg, Respondent, v. Benjamin H. Roth et al., Doing Business as B. H. Roth & Co., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 267
Pages: 990–991

Head Matter:
Albert Zaidenberg, Respondent, v. Benjamin H. Roth et al., Doing Business as B. H. Roth & Co., Appellants.

Opinion:
Action to recover damages for breach of contract. Order denying defendants' motion to dismiss the third amended complaint, pursuant to section 476 of the Civil Practice Act, on the ground that the admissions contained in the amended bill of particulars herein warrant such dismissal, and order denying ¡defendants' motion, pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the complaint or for other relief, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Close, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Aldrich, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 1002.]