Case Name: Wallace BOUDREAUX, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-01-03
Citations: 572 So. 2d 1372
Docket Number: No. 75163
Parties: Wallace BOUDREAUX, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 572
Pages: 1372–1373

Head Matter:
Wallace BOUDREAUX, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 75163.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Jan. 3, 1991.
Barbara M. Linthicum, Public Defender and Lawrence M. Korn, Asst. Public Defender, Second Judicial Circuit, Tallahassee, for petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and William A. Hatch, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have for review Boudreaux v. State, 553 So.2d 376 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989), based on express and direct conflict with Coulson v. State, 342 So.2d 1042 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.
The question posed by this case is the same as that in Larson v. State, 572 So.2d 1368 (Fla.1991), in which we disapproved a similar analysis used by this district court. Accordingly, the opinion below is quashed and the cause remanded to the district court to determine whether the conditions of probation imposed by the trial court were legal, as required by Larson.
It is so ordered.
SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.
EHRLICH, J., concurs in result only with an opinion.