Case Name: Herbert Larry PEARSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2014-07-02
Citations: 141 So. 3d 722
Docket Number: No. 3D14-955
Parties: Herbert Larry PEARSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SUAREZ, ROTHENBERG, and LOGUE, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 141
Pages: 722–723

Head Matter:
Herbert Larry PEARSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D14-955.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 2, 2014.
Herbert Larry Pearson, in proper person.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SUAREZ, ROTHENBERG, and LOGUE, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the trial court's denial of the defendant's petition filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The defendant was sentenced pursuant to a plea on August 9, 2011. On August 8, 2013, he placed his Rule 3.850 petition into hands of the prison mailroom official. The petition was clearly date stamped: "Provided to Martin Correctional Institution on 8/8/13 for mailing" and initialed by the mailroom official. The prison mailroom log shows the petition was placed in outgoing mail to the Clerk of Court on August 9, 2013, exactly two years from the date of conviction and sentence.
As stated by this Court in Saavedra v. State, 59 So.3d 191 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011), "[t]he two-year time limitation for filing motions for post-conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 does not begin to run until appellate proceedings have concluded and the court issues a mandate or thirty days after the judgment and sentence become final if no direct appeal is filed." In addition, in Ramos v. State, 658 So.2d 169 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), this Court stated: "where the motion for post-conviction relief is essentially a motion to set aside the plea and no previous appeal has been taken, the judgment and sentence do not become "final" for purposes of the rule until the thirty-day period for filing an appeal expires." Applying those cases here, defendant's sentence was not final until September 8, 2013 and his motion was timely filed.
We reverse and remand for consideration of the defendant's Rule 3.850 petition on the merits.