Case Name: CITY OF SEDALIA, Missouri, Respondent, v. Robert E. DUMSDAY and Bessie Dumsday, Appellants
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2016-05-03
Citations: 488 S.W.3d 732
Docket Number: WD 78965
Parties: CITY OF SEDALIA, Missouri, Respondent, v. Robert E. DUMSDAY and Bessie Dumsday, Appellants.
Judges: Before Division Two: Victor C. Howard, Presiding Judge, Thomas H. Newton, Judge and Karen King Mitchell, Judge
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 488
Pages: 732–733

Head Matter:
CITY OF SEDALIA, Missouri, Respondent, v. Robert E. DUMSDAY and Bessie Dumsday, Appellants.
WD 78965
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Order filed: May 3, 2016
Anne C. Gardner, Sedalia, for Respondent
William A. Shull, II, Warrensburg, for Appellants
Before Division Two: Victor C. Howard, Presiding Judge, Thomas H. Newton, Judge and Karen King Mitchell, Judge

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Robert and Bessie Dumsday appeal from the trial court's grant of summary judgment to City of Sedalia, Missouri ("the city") on its petition for an order to remove the Dumsdays from their property so that the city could demolish the home there, which constituted a public nuisance pursuant to the city's Code of Ordinances. The Dumsdays claim that the order of the city's Board of Appeals. ("Board") was not final because it made contradictory declarations and because it ordered future time ly performance by Dumsdays, but they were not notified of any right to a further hearing when-they were determined not to have met the requirements of the order. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).