Case Name: Bernestine HILL v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (BALLARD, SPAHR, ANDREWS INGERSOLL and Great Northern Insurance Co.), Appeal of BALLARD, SPAHR, ANDREWS & INGERSOLL
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2002-08-26
Citations: 805 A.2d 509
Docket Number: 
Parties: Bernestine HILL v. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (BALLARD, SPAHR, ANDREWS INGERSOLL and Great Northern Insurance Co.), Appeal of BALLARD, SPAHR, ANDREWS & INGERSOLL.
Judges: BEFORE: ZAPPALA, C.J., and CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN, SAYLOR and EAKIN, JJ.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 805
Pages: 509–514

Head Matter:
Bernestine HILL v. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (BALLARD, SPAHR, ANDREWS INGERSOLL and Great Northern Insurance Co.), Appeal of BALLARD, SPAHR, ANDREWS & INGERSOLL.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Submitted Jan. 30, 2001.
Resubmitted Jan. 30, 2001.
Decided Aug. 26, 2002.
Andrew Edson Greenberg, Christian Davis, Philadelphia, for appellant, Ballard, Spahr, Andrews & Ingersoll.
David Hawkins, Pittsburgh, for appellee, W.C.A.B.
Richard Warren Rosenblitt, Philadelphia, for appellee, Bernestine Hill.
BEFORE: ZAPPALA, C.J., and CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN, SAYLOR and EAKIN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
AND NOW, this 26th day of August, 2002, the Commonwealth Court's order is vacated and the matter remanded for reconsideration in light of Vista Int'l Hotel v. WCAB (Daniels), 560 Pa. 12, 742 A.2d 649 (1999). See generally Montgomery Hosp. v. WCAB (Armstrong), 793 A.2d 182, 189 (Pa.Cmwlth.2002); Darrall v. WCAB (H.J. Heinz Co.), 792 A.2d 706, 712-13 (Pa.Cmwlth.2002); Martin v. WCAB (Red Rose Transit Auth), 783 A.2d 384, 391 (Pa.Cmwlth.2001).
Madame Justice NEWMAN files a concurring statement.