Case Name: PEOPLE v. McCOY
Court: Michigan Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Michigan
Decision Date: 1970-10-05
Citations: 27 Mich. App. 183
Docket Number: Docket No. 7,928
Parties: PEOPLE v. McCOY
Judges: Before: Fitzgerald, P. J., and Holbrook and T. M. Burns, JJ.
Reporter: Michigan appeals reports; cases decided in the Michigan Court of Appeals.
Volume: 27
Pages: 183–184

Head Matter:
PEOPLE v. McCOY
Appeal from Recorder’s Court of Detroit, Robert J. Colombo, J.
Submitted Division 1 September 1, 1970, at Grand Rapids.
(Docket No. 7,928.)
Decided October 5, 1970.
Robert Lee McCoy was convicted, on his plea of guilty, of larceny from the person. Defendant appeals.
Motion to affirm granted.
Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, William L. Cabalan, Prosecuting Attorney, Dominick R. Carnovale, Chief, Appellate Department, and Arthur N. Bishop, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.
Richard M. Lustig, for defendant on appeal.
Before: Fitzgerald, P. J., and Holbrook and T. M. Burns, JJ.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This case is submitted on the people's motion to affirm. Defendant has appealed from his conviction, upon a plea of guilty, of the charge of larceny from a person. MCLA § 750.357 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.589). Defendant, with benefit of counsel, tendered his plea on May 16, 1969, in Detroit Recorder's Court. On appeal, he claims the trial judge erred in failing to specifically obtain a waiver of three constitutional rights: the right to trial by jury; the privilege against self-incrimination; and the right to confront his accusers. He relies on Boykin v. Alabama (1969), 395 US 238 (89 S Ct 1709, 23 L Ed 2d 274).
Since we definitively determined the single issue defendant now raises in People v. Taylor (1970), 23 Mich App 595, there is manifestly no need for further consideration of defendant's appeal. Motion to affirm is granted.