Case Name: RUTHERFORD CONTROLS INT'L CORP., a Canadian Corporation and Rutherford Controls Int'l Corp, a Virginia Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. VANGUARD SECURITY ENGINEERING CORP., LTD., Defendant, and Security Door Controls, Inc., Defendant-Appellee; Rutherford Controls Int'l Corp., a Canadian Corporation and Rutherford Controls Int'l Corp, a Virginia Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Vanguard Security Engineering Corp., LTD., Defendant, and Security Door Controls, Inc., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-04-01
Citations: 370 F. App'x 108
Docket Number: Nos. 2010-1113, 2010-1114
Parties: RUTHERFORD CONTROLS INT’L CORP., a Canadian Corporation and Rutherford Controls Int'l Corp, a Virginia Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. VANGUARD SECURITY ENGINEERING CORP., LTD., Defendant, and Security Door Controls, Inc., Defendant-Appellee. Rutherford Controls IntT Corp., a Canadian Corporation and Rutherford Controls Int'l Corp, a Virginia Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Vanguard Security Engineering Corp., LTD., Defendant, and Security Door Controls, Inc., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 370
Pages: 108–109

Head Matter:
RUTHERFORD CONTROLS INT’L CORP., a Canadian Corporation and Rutherford Controls Int'l Corp, a Virginia Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. VANGUARD SECURITY ENGINEERING CORP., LTD., Defendant, and Security Door Controls, Inc., Defendant-Appellee. Rutherford Controls IntT Corp., a Canadian Corporation and Rutherford Controls Int'l Corp, a Virginia Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Vanguard Security Engineering Corp., LTD., Defendant, and Security Door Controls, Inc., Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 2010-1113, 2010-1114.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
April 1, 2010.

Opinion:
ON MOTION
ORDER
Security Door Controls, Inc. moves without opposition to voluntarily dismiss its appeal, 2010-1114.
Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) The motion is granted. Appeal 2010-1114 is dismissed.
(2) Each side shall bear its own costs related to 2010-1114.
(3) The revised official caption in 2010-1113 is reflected above.