Case Name: Hiram LOPEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Warden Timothy S. STEWART; Lieutenant Mark Lathrop, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-12-20
Citations: 671 F. App'x 208
Docket Number: No. 16-6947
Parties: Hiram LOPEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Warden Timothy S. STEWART; Lieutenant Mark Lathrop, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges,
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 671
Pages: 208–208

Head Matter:
Hiram LOPEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Warden Timothy S. STEWART; Lieutenant Mark Lathrop, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-6947
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: December 15, 2016
Decided: December 20, 2016
Hiram Lopez, Appellant Pro Se. Rebecca Ann Koch, Assistant United States Attorney, Katherine Anne Day, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges,

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Hiram Lopez appeals the district court's order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in for-ma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lopez v. Stewart, No. 1:15-cv-02747-RDB, 2016 WL 3257820 (D. Md. filed June 14, 2016; entered June 15, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED