Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joel SOCORRO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-11-23
Citations: 447 F. App'x 921
Docket Number: No. 10-13665
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joel SOCORRO, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before TJOFLAT, CARNES and WILSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 447
Pages: 921–921

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joel SOCORRO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-13665
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Nov. 23, 2011.
Anne R. Schultz, Wifredo A. Ferrer, U.S. Attorney, Christopher Párente, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Richard Docobo, Attorney at Law, Miami, FL, Joel Socorro, Ray Brook, NY, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before TJOFLAT, CARNES and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Joel Socorro appeals his conviction on a plea of guilty for carrying a firearm during a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1). Socorro claims that his conviction is invalid because he was denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial: he was not arraigned until thirteen years following the return of his indictment. Socorro did not move the district court to dismiss his indictment on that speedy trial ground; moreover, his plea of guilty operated as a waiver of all nonjuris-dictional defects in the criminal proceeding, including a violation of the right to a speedy trial. United States v. Yunis, 723 F.2d 795, 796 (11th Cir.1984). Socorro's conviction is, accordingly, AFFIRMED.
. The crime of violence was an attempt to rob a shipment of properly in the possession of the United Parcel Service on June 11, 1996, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951(a).