Case Name: Paul McDONALD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lieutenant R. FRIEND; Officer Shimko; Sergeant Perry; Tichnell, Chief of Security; Jacobs, Mailroom Official; Liobel, Mailroom Official; Jon Galley, Warden, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-11-07
Citations: 205 F. App'x 105
Docket Number: No. 06-7208
Parties: Paul McDONALD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lieutenant R. FRIEND; Officer Shimko; Sergeant Perry; Tichnell, Chief of Security; Jacobs, Mailroom Official; Liobel, Mailroom Official; Jon Galley, Warden, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 205
Pages: 105–106

Head Matter:
Paul McDONALD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lieutenant R. FRIEND; Officer Shimko; Sergeant Perry; Tichnell, Chief of Security; Jacobs, Mailroom Official; Liobel, Mailroom Official; Jon Galley, Warden, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 06-7208.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 31, 2006.
Decided: Nov. 7, 2006.
Paul McDonald, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Paul McDonald appeals the district court's order denying in part and granting in part his motion to supplement his claim and denying his motion for a court order authorizing the use of certified mail for all of his outgoing legal mail. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order McDonald seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.