Case Name: KYOCERA CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant, v. PRUDENTIAL-BACHE TRADE SERVICES, INC., fdba Prudential-Bache Trade Corporation, Prudential Capital & Investment Services, Inc., Lapine Technology Corporation, and Lapine Holding Company, Inc., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees; Lapine Technology Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kyocera Corporation, Defendant-Appellant; Lapine Technology Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-Defendant-Appellee, v. Kyocera Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Prudential-Bache Trade Order Services, Inc., fdba Prudential-Bache Trade Corporation; Prudential Capital & Investment Services, Inc., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-12-17
Citations: 314 F.3d 1003
Docket Number: Nos. 01-15630, 01-15653, 01-16182, 01-16394, 01-16528, 01-16392
Parties: KYOCERA CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant, v. PRUDENTIAL-BACHE TRADE SERVICES, INC., fdba Prudential-Bache Trade Corporation, Prudential Capital & Investment Services, Inc., Lapine Technology Corporation, and Lapine Holding Company, Inc., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees. Lapine Technology Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kyocera Corporation, Defendant-Appellant. Lapine Technology Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-Defendant-Appellee, v. Kyocera Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Prudential-Bache Trade Order Services, Inc., fdba Prudential-Bache Trade Corporation; Prudential Capital & Investment Services, Inc., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees.
Judges: Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 314
Pages: 1003–1004

Head Matter:
KYOCERA CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant, v. PRUDENTIAL-BACHE TRADE SERVICES, INC., fdba Prudential-Bache Trade Corporation, Prudential Capital & Investment Services, Inc., Lapine Technology Corporation, and Lapine Holding Company, Inc., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees. Lapine Technology Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kyocera Corporation, Defendant-Appellant. Lapine Technology Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-Defendant-Appellee, v. Kyocera Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Prudential-Bache Trade Order Services, Inc., fdba Prudential-Bache Trade Corporation; Prudential Capital & Investment Services, Inc., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees.
Nos. 01-15630, 01-15653, 01-16182, 01-16394, 01-16528, 01-16392.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Dec. 17, 2002.
Charles S. Treat, Paul H. Dawes, La-tham & Watkins, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appel-lees.
Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
. Judge Tashima was recused.