Case Name: London & Scottish Assurance Corporation, Limited, Plaintiff in Error, v. Vitale Dolce, Defendant in Error
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1928-08-01
Citations: 96 Fla. 374
Docket Number: 
Parties: London & Scottish Assurance Corporation, Limited, Plaintiff in Error, v. Vitale Dolce, Defendant in Error.
Judges: Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Strum, Brown and Buford, J., J., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 96
Pages: 374–374

Head Matter:
London & Scottish Assurance Corporation, Limited, Plaintiff in Error, v. Vitale Dolce, Defendant in Error.
En Banc.
Decision filed August 1, 1928.
Petition for rehearing denied September 19, 1928.
Hampton, Bull & Penche, for Plaintiff in Error;
■ Macfarlane, Pettingill, Maefarlane & Fowler, for Defendant in Error.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel' for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, Mr. Chief Justice Ellis, Mr. Justice Terrell, Mr. Justice Strum and Mr. Justice Brown are of the opinion that the evidence is not sufficient to support the verdict and that the judgment of the circuit court should be reversed while Mr. Justice Whitfield and Mr. Justice Buford are of opinion that the said judgment should be affirmed; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the circuit court be and the same is hereby reversed and the cause remanded .for a new trial.
Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Strum, Brown and Buford, J., J., concur.