Case Name: GERMANTOWN CAB CO., Respondent v. PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY, Petitioner; Sawink, Inc., Respondent v. Philadelphia Parking Authority, Petitioner; Germantown Cab Co., Respondent v. Philadelphia Parking Authority, Petitioner
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2011-02-23
Citations: 14 A.3d 821
Docket Number: 
Parties: GERMANTOWN CAB CO., Respondent v. PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY, Petitioner. Sawink, Inc., Respondent v. Philadelphia Parking Authority, Petitioner. Germantown Cab Co., Respondent v. Philadelphia Parking Authority, Petitioner.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 14
Pages: 821–821

Head Matter:
GERMANTOWN CAB CO., Respondent v. PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY, Petitioner. Sawink, Inc., Respondent v. Philadelphia Parking Authority, Petitioner. Germantown Cab Co., Respondent v. Philadelphia Parking Authority, Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Feb. 23, 2011.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 23rd day of February, 2011, the Petitions for Allowance of Appeal are GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
Did the Legislature exempt the Philadelphia Parking Authority from complying with the statewide rulemaking procedures contained in the Commonwealth Documents Law (45 P.S. § 1102, 1201 to 1208) because the Authority is a hybrid agency with a unique rulemaking procedure?