Case Name: Michael Lee WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-11-12
Citations: 606 So. 2d 1287
Docket Number: No. 91-2086
Parties: Michael Lee WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and ANSTEAD and HERSEY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 606
Pages: 1287–1287

Head Matter:
Michael Lee WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 91-2086.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Nov. 12, 1992.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Joseph R. Chloupek, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James J. Carney, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Because appellant properly could be treated as an adult under section 39.-047(4)(e)5, Florida Statutes (Supp.1990), we affirm. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979).
AFFIRMED.
GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and ANSTEAD and HERSEY, JJ., concur.