Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eric Arthur WALTON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-04-30
Citations: 275 F. App'x 264
Docket Number: No. 08-6188
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Eric Arthur WALTON, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 275
Pages: 264–264

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Eric Arthur WALTON, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 08-6188.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 24, 2008.
Decided: April 30, 2008.
Eric Arthur Walton, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Office of the United States Attorney, Mai’tinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Eric Arthur Walton appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying Walton's motion filed pursuant to Fed. R.Crim.P. 35 (applicable to offenses committed before November 1, 1987). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Walton, No. 1:84-cr00100-IMK-JES-l, 2008 WL 114981 (N.D.W.Va. Jan. 11, 2008). We deny Walton's motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.