Case Name: Darryl ALLMOND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Al MOSELY; John & Jane Doe; Melissa Arnold; Barbara Johnson; Ahmed Ghulamani, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-05-20
Citations: 63 F. App'x 162
Docket Number: No. 03-1063
Parties: Darryl ALLMOND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Al MOSELY; John & Jane Doe; Melissa Arnold; Barbara Johnson; Ahmed Ghulamani, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 63
Pages: 162–163

Head Matter:
Darryl ALLMOND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Al MOSELY; John & Jane Doe; Melissa Arnold; Barbara Johnson; Ahmed Ghulamani, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 03-1063.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 15, 2003.
Decided May 20, 2003.
Darryl Allmond, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Joseph Terrell, Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
PER CURIAM.
Darryl Allmond seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying permission to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Allmond v. Mosely, No. CA-02-1533-A (E.D. Va. Nov. 14, 2002; filed Dec. 16, 2002 & entered Dec. 18, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.