Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Martin Elery BEAL, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-04-08
Citations: 321 F. App'x 688
Docket Number: No. 08-30083
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Martin Elery BEAL, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 321
Pages: 688–688

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Martin Elery BEAL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-30083.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 18, 2009.
Filed April 8, 2009.
Frank Papagni, Assistant U.S., Office of U.S. Attorney, Eugene, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Bryan E. Lessley, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Eugene, OR, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Martin Elery Beal appeals the 188-month sentence imposed following his conditional guilty plea to three counts of being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). He contends that the district court erred in treating his four prior convictions for first degree burglary under Or.Rev.Stat. § 164.225 as violent felonies under the Armed Career Criminal Act. This contention is foreclosed by United States v. Mayer, 560 F.3d 948, 962-63 (9th Cir.2009) (holding that first degree burglary under § 164.225 is categorically a "violent felony" under the Act's residual clause).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.