Case Name: Vincent John HALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Larry TUSTALL; Maxton Police Department; Major Goings; Scotland County Sheriff Department, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-10-01
Citations: 47 F. App'x 251
Docket Number: No. 02-6612
Parties: Vincent John HALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Larry TUSTALL; Maxton Police Department; Major Goings; Scotland County Sheriff Department, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 47
Pages: 251–251

Head Matter:
Vincent John HALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Larry TUSTALL; Maxton Police Department; Major Goings; Scotland County Sheriff Department, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 02-6612.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 30, 2002.
Decided Oct. 1, 2002.
Vincent John Hall, Appellant Pro se.
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Vincent John Hall appeals the district court's order dismissing as frivolous his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Hall v. Tustall, No. CA-02-28-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 20, 2002). We deny Hall's motion for default judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.