Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sean Darrell JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-05-26
Citations: 380 F. App'x 290
Docket Number: No. 10-6203
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sean Darrell JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 380
Pages: 290–291

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sean Darrell JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-6203.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 7, 2010.
Decided: May 26, 2010.
Sean Darrell Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. L. Patrick Auld, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Sean Darrell Johnson appeals a district court order denying his motion for a sentence reduction filed under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We affirm.
The legal interpretations of the Sentencing Guidelines and the amendments are reviewed de novo. Factual findings are reviewed for clear error. See United States v. Turner, 59 F.3d 481, 483-84 (4th Cir.1995). This court reviews the denial of a motion for a reduction in the sentence under § 3582(c)(2) for abuse of discretion. United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir.2004).
Our review of the transcripts shows the district court did not err in concluding Johnson was accountable for at least five kilograms of crack cocaine. Thus, he was not eligible for a sentence reduction under Amendment 706. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.