Case Name: Miriam ALAMO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-06-26
Citations: 686 So. 2d 17
Docket Number: No. 96-00127
Parties: Miriam ALAMO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: RYDER, A.C.J., and BLUE and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 686
Pages: 17–17

Head Matter:
Miriam ALAMO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 96-00127.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
June 26, 1996.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Miriam Alamo challenges the denial of her motion to correct illegal sentence brought under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), alleging she is entitled to credit pursuant to State v. Green, 547 So.2d 925 (Fla.1989). The trial court denied the motion without attaching any documentation which would refute the issue raised by Alamo.
Accordingly we reverse. On remand, should the trial court again deny the motion, it must attach portions of the record which refute Alamo's claim. See Becton v. State, 668 So.2d 1107 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).
Reversed and remanded.
RYDER, A.C.J., and BLUE and QUINCE, JJ., concur.