Case Name: Dorian ALEXANDER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2019-02-13
Citations: 567 S.W.3d 694
Docket Number: No. ED 106389
Parties: Dorian ALEXANDER, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Mary K. Hoff, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 567
Pages: 694–695

Head Matter:
Dorian ALEXANDER, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 106389
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
FILED: February 13, 2019
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: Randall Brachman, Office of the State Public Defender, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.
ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT: Eric Schmitt, Attorney General, Karen Louise Kramer, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.
Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Mary K. Hoff, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Dorian Alexander appeals from the motion court's "Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order" ("Judgment") denying his Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence, which alleged ineffective assistance of counsel, following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).