Case Name: Kesheanna JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant v. NORAC, INC. (originally named as Norac Additives Inc), doing business as Norac Additives, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-05-24
Citations: 685 F. App'x 510
Docket Number: No. 16-2971
Parties: Kesheanna JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant v. NORAC, INC. (originally named as Norac Additives Inc), doing business as Norac Additives, Defendant-Appellee
Judges: Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 685
Pages: 510–510

Head Matter:
Kesheanna JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant v. NORAC, INC. (originally named as Norac Additives Inc), doing business as Norac Additives, Defendant-Appellee
No. 16-2971
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: May 19, 2017
Filed: May 24, 2017
Robert E. Kinchen, Kinchen Law Firm, Helena, AR, for Plaintiff-Appellant
Brian A. Vandiver, Cox & Sterling, North Little Rock, AR, for Defendant-Appellee
Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this employment-discrimination action, Kesheanna Jackson appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment on her harassment and retaliation claims under Title VII and the Arkansas Civil Rights Act. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.
This' court agrees with the district court's reasoning and concludes that summary judgment was properly granted. See Beaulieu v. Ludeman, 690 F.3d 1017, 1024 (8th Cir. 2012) (grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo, viewing record in light most favorable to nonmovant); Integrity Floorcovering, Inc. v. Broan-Nutone, LLC, 521 F.3d 914, 917 (8th Cir. 2008) (district court's determination of state law is reviewed de novo).
The judgment is affirmed.
. The Honorable D.P. Marshall Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.