Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenneth PARNELL, a.k.a. Southern_Man2003, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-12-09
Citations: 404 F. App'x 455
Docket Number: No. 10-11047
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenneth PARNELL, a.k.a. Southern_Man2003, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before EDMONDSON, CARNES and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 404
Pages: 455–455

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenneth PARNELL, a.k.a. Southern_Man2003, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-11047
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Dec. 9, 2010.
Steven E. Butler, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Gregory A. Bordenkircher, Eugene Seidel, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Maria E. Murphy, Mobile, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Neil L. Hanley, Attorney at Law, Mobile, AL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before EDMONDSON, CARNES and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Neil L. Hanley, appointed counsel for Kenneth Parnell in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Parnell's conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.