Case Name: In re: Tyrone Lorenzo ROBINSON, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-06-29
Citations: 231 F. App'x 242
Docket Number: No. 07-6700
Parties: In re: Tyrone Lorenzo ROBINSON, Petitioner.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 231
Pages: 242–242

Head Matter:
In re: Tyrone Lorenzo ROBINSON, Petitioner.
No. 07-6700.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 21, 2007.
Decided: June 29, 2007.
Tyrone Lorenzo Robinson, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Tyrone Lorenzo Robinson petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the state court to rule on his application for post-conviction relief. We conclude that Robinson is not entitled to mandamus relief.
Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir.1988). Further, mandamus is a drastic remedy and should only be used in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402, 96 S.Ct. 2119, 48 L.Ed.2d 725 (1976); In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir.1987). Because this court does not have jurisdiction to grant mandamus relief against state officials, Gurley v. Superior Court of Mecklenburg County, 411 F.2d 586, 587 (4th Cir.1969), the relief sought by Robinson is not available by way of mandamus.
Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus, as supplemented. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.