Case Name: In re: Eleazar TEODORO-BASILIO, a/k/a Chelelo, a/k/a J. Eleazar Teodoro-Basilio, a/k/a Huichol, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-05-31
Citations: 432 F. App'x 268
Docket Number: No. 10-2332
Parties: In re: Eleazar TEODORO-BASILIO, a/k/a Chelelo, a/k/a J. Eleazar Teodoro-Basilio, a/k/a Huichol, Petitioner.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 432
Pages: 268–269

Head Matter:
In re: Eleazar TEODORO-BASILIO, a/k/a Chelelo, a/k/a J. Eleazar Teodoro-Basilio, a/k/a Huichol, Petitioner.
No. 10-2332.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 13, 2011.
Decided: May 31, 2011.
Eleazar Teodoro-Basilio, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Eleazar Teodoro-Basilio petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his Petition for Writ of Error Audita Querela. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Although we find that mandamus relief is not warranted because the delay is not unreasonable, we deny the mandamus petition without prejudice to the filing of another mandamus petition if the district court does not act expeditiously. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.