Case Name: ADAMS SHEET METAL CORPORATION v. CITY OF ROYAL OAK; CITY OF ROYAL OAK v. CLAIR DITCHY ASSOCIATES
Court: Michigan Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Michigan
Decision Date: 1968-06-10
Citations: 11 Mich. App. 657
Docket Number: Docket No. 3,946
Parties: ADAMS SHEET METAL CORPORATION v. CITY OF ROYAL OAK. CITY OF ROYAL OAK v. CLAIR DITCHY ASSOCIATES.
Judges: Quinn, P. J., and Fitzgerald and J. H. G-illis, JJ., concurred.
Reporter: Michigan appeals reports; cases decided in the Michigan Court of Appeals.
Volume: 11
Pages: 657–658

Head Matter:
ADAMS SHEET METAL CORPORATION v. CITY OF ROYAL OAK. CITY OF ROYAL OAK v. CLAIR DITCHY ASSOCIATES.
Appeal and Error — Trial Court Findings.
Findings of trial judge in third-party aetion for damages for negligence in maintenance of air conditioner held, not clearly erroneous on record presented (GCR 1963, 517.1).
Reference for Points in Headnote
5 Am Jur 2d, Appeal and Error § 839 et seq.
Appeal from Oakland; Adams (Clark J.), J.
Submitted Division 2 June 5, 1968, at Detroit.
(Docket No. 3,946.)
Decided June 10,1968.
Complaint by Adams Sheet Metal Corporation, a Michigan corporation, against the City of Royal Oak, a municipal corporation, for costs of material and labor in replacement of air conditioner coils. Third-party complaint by City of Royal Oak against Clair Ditchy Associates, a partnership, for negligence in causing damage which necessitated repair. Judgment for principal plaintiff. Judgment of no cause of action in favor of third-party defendant. Third-party plaintiff City of Royal Oak appeals from judgment in favor of third-party defendant.
Affirmed.
Allan G. Eertler, for third-party plaintiff City of Royal Oak.
Malcolm Eeber, for third-party defendant Clair Ditchy Associates.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Third-party plaintiff appeals from a judgment of no cause of action in favor of third-party defendant entered by the trial court sitting without a jury on the basis that the alleged negligence of defendant had not been established.
A review of the trial record fails to establish that the findings of the trial judge which support his judgment are clearly erroneous. OCR 1963, 517.1.
Affirmed, with costs to third-party defendant.
Quinn, P. J., and Fitzgerald and J. H. G-illis, JJ., concurred.