Case Name: KENNEDY, KING & ZIMMER, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1986-04-02
Citations: 78 Or. App. 319
Docket Number: 85-T-21; A36288
Parties: KENNEDY, KING & ZIMMER, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION, Respondent.
Judges: Before Warden, Presiding Judge, and Van Hoomissen and Young, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 78
Pages: 319–320

Head Matter:
Submitted on record and briefs February 27,
reversed April 2, 1986
KENNEDY, KING & ZIMMER, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION, Respondent.
(85-T-21; A36288)
715 P2d 1129
George W. McKallip, Jr. and Kennedy, King & Zimmer, Portland, filed the brief for petitioner.
Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, James E. Mountain, Jr., Solicitor General, and Richard D. Wasserman, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Warden, Presiding Judge, and Van Hoomissen and Young, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Petitioner, a partnership of lawyers, seeks judicial review of the referee's decision holding that it is not entitled to succeed to the experience rating of its predecessor partnership after one of the partners withdrew from the partnership. The Employment Division concedes that petitioner is the successor in interest and that the referee's decision should be reversed.
Reversed.