Case Name: SUMITOMO MITSUBISHI SILICON CORPORATION (also known as Sumco), and Sumco USA Corporation (also known as Sumco USA), Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MEMC ELECTRONIC MATERIALS, INC., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-12-05
Citations: 301 F. App'x 959
Docket Number: No. 2007-1578
Parties: SUMITOMO MITSUBISHI SILICON CORPORATION (also known as Sumco), and Sumco USA Corporation (also known as Sumco USA), Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MEMC ELECTRONIC MATERIALS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before NEWMAN, PLAGER, and SCHALL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 301
Pages: 959–959

Head Matter:
SUMITOMO MITSUBISHI SILICON CORPORATION (also known as Sumco), and Sumco USA Corporation (also known as Sumco USA), Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MEMC ELECTRONIC MATERIALS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 2007-1578.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Dec. 5, 2008.
R. Terrance Rader, Rader, Fishman & Grauer PLLC, of Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief were Linda Dupont Mettes and Leigh C. Taggart.
Robert M. Evans, Jr. Senniger Powers LLP, of St. Louis, Missouri, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were David W. Harlan and Marc W. Vander Tuig.
Before NEWMAN, PLAGER, and SCHALL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The court concludes that jurisdiction of this appeal is properly with the Federal Circuit, for the right to relief depends on resolution of a substantial question of patent law.
On the merits, in accordance with Federal Circuit Rule 36 we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.