Case Name: Maxine ROMERO et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. George E. BRAZZEL et al., Defendant-Appellee
Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1980-07-22
Citations: 393 So. 2d 141
Docket Number: No. 7758
Parties: Maxine ROMERO et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. George E. BRAZZEL et al., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before FORET, STOKER and LA-BORDE, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 393
Pages: 141–141

Head Matter:
Maxine ROMERO et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. George E. BRAZZEL et al., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 7758.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.
July 22, 1980.
Francis J. Mooney, Jr., New Orleans, for plaintiffs-appellants.
Plauché, Smith, Hebert & Nieset, Allen L. Smith, Jr., Woodley, Barnett, Cox, Williams & Fenet, James E. Williams, Lake Charles, Voorhies & Labbe, Patrick A. Juneau, Jr., and Donohoe, Bernard, Torian, Diaz, McNamara & Abell, Frank X. Neuner, Jr., Mouton, Roy, Carmouche, Bivens & Kraft, Harmon F. Roy, Allen, Gooch & Bourgeois, Joel E. Gooch, Lafayette, Landry, Watkins & Bonin, Alfred S. Landry, Jr., New Iberia, for defendant-appellee.
Before FORET, STOKER and LA-BORDE, JJ.

Opinion:
LABORDE, Judge.
This is the companion case to Hebert v. Brazzel, 393 So.2d 135 (La.App.3rd Cir. 1980), decided by us this day.
For the reasons assigned therein, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in all respects. Costs of this appeal are taxed to appellant.
AFFIRMED.
FORET, J., concurs in the result.
Writs granted, 394 So.2d 1234 and 394 So.2d 1235.