Case Name: Eric V. SHELBY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jean HILL, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-02-22
Citations: 221 F. App'x 542
Docket Number: No. 05-35898
Parties: Eric V. SHELBY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jean HILL, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 221
Pages: 542–542

Head Matter:
Eric V. SHELBY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jean HILL, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 05-35898.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 5, 2007.
Filed Feb. 22, 2007.
Anthony David Bornstein, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Portland, OR, for Petitioner-Appellant.
Steven R. Powers, Esq., Office of the Oregon Attorney General, Salem, OR, for Respondent-Appellee.
Before: D.W. NELSON, KLEINFELD, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
The Oregon Department of Corrections properly applied the regulations in force at the time of Shelby's in-prison misconduct that limited the restoration of Shelby's good time credits. The regulation was in force before the misconduct, so there was no ex post facto violation.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
. See Hunter v. Ayers, 336 F.3d 1007, 1011-12 (9th Cir.2003).