Case Name: Keith DIAMOND and Deborah Diamond, Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. The AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD, CT., et al., Appellees/ Cross-Appellants
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2005-01-19
Citations: 890 So. 2d 1248
Docket Number: No. 3D03-1206
Parties: Keith DIAMOND and Deborah Diamond, Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. The AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD, CT., et al., Appellees/ Cross-Appellants.
Judges: Before GREEN, FLETCHER, and WELLS, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 890
Pages: 1248–1248

Head Matter:
Keith DIAMOND and Deborah Diamond, Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. The AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD, CT., et al., Appellees/ Cross-Appellants.
No. 3D03-1206.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan. 19, 2005.
Ginsberg & Schwartz and Arnold R. Ginsberg; Simon & Dondero, Miami, for appellants/cross-appellees.
Hinshaw & Culbertson and Gina Caruso Albanese and Andrew Grigsby and Marissa I. Delinks (Ft.Lauderdale), for appel-lees/cross-appellants.
Before GREEN, FLETCHER, and WELLS, JJ.

Opinion:
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING and MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION
PER CURIAM.
The opinion filed October 27, 2004 is withdrawn, and the following is substituted in its place.
We reverse the trial court's order which struck The Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, Ct.'s proposal for settlement in an action by the Diamonds under a valuable items policy. See U.S. Security Ins. Co. v. Cahuasqui, 760 So.2d 1101 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), rev. dismissed, 796 So.2d 532 (Fla.2001)(The offer of judgment statute applies to all civil actions for damages.).
The motion for clarification is denied.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.