Case Name: Gregory HUDSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2011-04-12
Citations: 340 S.W.3d 604
Docket Number: No. ED 95213
Parties: Gregory HUDSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 340
Pages: 604–605

Head Matter:
Gregory HUDSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 95213.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
April 12, 2011.
Brocea Smith, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, John W. Grantham, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Gregory Hudson, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).