Case Name: Edwin E. CUMMINGS, et al. v. Robert S. ORRE, et al.
Court: Maine Supreme Judicial Court
Jurisdiction: Maine
Decision Date: 1986-02-06
Citations: 503 A.2d 1308
Docket Number: 
Parties: Edwin E. CUMMINGS, et al. v. Robert S. ORRE, et al.
Judges: Before McKUSICK, C.J., and NICHOLS, ROBERTS, WATHEN, GLASSMAN and SCOLNIK, JJ.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 503
Pages: 1308–1308

Head Matter:
Edwin E. CUMMINGS, et al. v. Robert S. ORRE, et al.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.
Argued Jan. 14, 1986.
Decided Feb. 6, 1986.
Kurtz & Myers, Theodore H. Kurtz (orally), South Paris, for plaintiffs.
Turner & Whittier, P.A., Craig E. Turner (orally), David Q. Whittier, South Paris, Robert B. Dow, Jr., Norway, for defendants.
Before McKUSICK, C.J., and NICHOLS, ROBERTS, WATHEN, GLASSMAN and SCOLNIK, JJ.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
The plaintiffs, children of the late Elliot S. Cummings, appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, Oxford County, construing the will of Dorothy N. Cummings so as to permit the lapse of a devise to Elliot who had predeceased her. The plaintiffs argue that the Superior Court erred in refusing to consider extrinsic evidence of the alleged intent of the testator that the devise not lapse. The personal representative of the estate of Dorothy N. Cummings cross-appeals, asserting that the court erred in awarding attorney fees to be paid out of the estate. Because we determine that the court correctly construed the will without resorting to extrinsic evidence and that the award of attorney fees was within the court's discretion, we affirm.
The entry is:
Judgment affirmed.
All concurring.