Case Name: Luther C. EDMONDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Elite Child, Incorporated; Sherry D. Battle, Plaintiffs, v. E. Preston GRISSOM, individually and in his capacity of Judge, Judicial Circuit of Virginia, Circuit Court of the City of Chesapeake, Defendant-Appellee, and Schroder Chesapeake, Incorporated, t/a Greenbrier Mall, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-06-08
Citations: 11 F. App'x 310
Docket Number: No. 01-1403
Parties: Luther C. EDMONDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Elite Child, Incorporated; Sherry D. Battle, Plaintiffs, v. E. Preston GRISSOM, individually and in his capacity of Judge, Judicial Circuit of Virginia, Circuit Court of the City of Chesapeake, Defendant-Appellee, and Schroder Chesapeake, Incorporated, t/a Greenbrier Mall, Defendant.
Judges: Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 11
Pages: 310–311

Head Matter:
Luther C. EDMONDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Elite Child, Incorporated; Sherry D. Battle, Plaintiffs, v. E. Preston GRISSOM, individually and in his capacity of Judge, Judicial Circuit of Virginia, Circuit Court of the City of Chesapeake, Defendant-Appellee, and Schroder Chesapeake, Incorporated, t/a Greenbrier Mall, Defendant.
No. 01-1403.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 31, 2001.
Decided June 8, 2001.
Luther C. Edmonds, pro se. Mark L. Earley, Attorney General, Gregory E. Lucyk, Edward Meade Macon, Mary Elizabeth Shea, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for appellee.
Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Luther C. Edmonds appeals the district court's order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion to set aside a prior order. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Edmonds v. Grissom, No. CA-98-488-2 (E.D.Va. Feb. 14, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.