Case Name: Anthony D. HILL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-03-27
Citations: 599 So. 2d 127
Docket Number: No. 91-00574
Parties: Anthony D. HILL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and McDONALD, RANDALL G., Associate Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 599
Pages: 127–130

Head Matter:
Anthony D. HILL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 91-00574.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
March 27, 1992.
Rehearing Denied June 10, 1992.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and John S. Lynch, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and David R. Gemmer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
. The following is the defense’s objection:
Your Honor, we would make an objection, based on the Neil case. Maggie Patterson is the second black female the State has excused.
She has been questioned by the State, not extensively. She did testify that her son is a security guard. Her daughter was a manager of a Burger King. Her brother has been convicted of theft. Other than that she said she could be impartial in the case. She could be fair.
I see absolutely nothing other than the fact that she is a black female that would be a reason to excuse her.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Anthony D. Hill appeals his convictions for first-degree murder and armed robbery and the sentences imposed in a combined sentencing proceeding for the armed robbery, grand theft auto, and a violation of community control. We affirm the convictions, but remand for resentencing.
The trial court initially sentenced Hill to departure sentences, but gave no oral or written reasons for departure. Six days later the trial court resentenced Hill and entered a written order of departure. The supreme court has held that a written order stating the reasons for departure must be filed on the day of sentencing. Ree v. State, 565 So.2d 1329 (Fla.1990). The trial court erred in failing to do so. Because the trial court did not state oral reasons for departure, it cannot resentence above the guidelines at a later time and then state the reasons for departure. See Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla.1990). We reverse Hill's sentences with instructions to the trial court to impose sentences within the guidelines.
We further note, and the state concedes, that the trial court failed to enter a written order of revocation of community control. We remand case number 89-5056 for entry of a proper order of revocation setting forth the conditions of community control to which Hill pleaded guilty. See Haynes v. State, 571 So.2d 1380 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).
Last, the written Sentence document in case number 89-5056 erroneously refers to an escape from confinement offense as count two instead of count three. It is necessary for the trial court upon resen-tencing to have the Sentence document show the sentence imposed for that crime as count three.
The convictions are affirmed. The eases are remanded for resentencing and entry of a proper revocation order.
CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and McDONALD, RANDALL G., Associate Judge, concur.
PARKER, J., concurs specially.
. The facts of these charges are not important to the issues on appeal. Generally, the evidence established that Hill shot and killed a manager of a Circle K store in the course of an armed robbery.