Case Name: STATE v. DUNN et
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1941-12-15
Citations: 35 Ohio Law Abs. 648
Docket Number: No. 18446
Parties: STATE v DUNN et
Judges: The facts are stated in the dissenting opinion of Morgan, J.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 35
Pages: 648–652

Head Matter:
STATE v DUNN et
Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist., Cuyahoga Co.
No. 18446.
Decided Dec. 15, 1941.
Frank T. Cullitan, Prosecuting Attorney, Cleveland; John Butler, Asst. Pros. Atty., Cleveland, for plaintiffappellee.
J. H. Nacey, Cleveland, for defendant-appellant.
The facts are stated in the dissenting opinion of Morgan, J.

Opinion:
OPINION
It is the opinion of the majority of this Court that the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas -should be, and the same is hereby affirmed. Exceptions may be noted.
LIEGHLEY, PJ" SKEEL, J., concur.
MORGAN, J., dissents.