Case Name: Charles Robert CANTER, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard GRAHAM, Jr., Warden; James Titchnell, Case Manager Manager; T. Humbertson, Case Manager Specialist; J. Wilson, Case Manager Supervisor; B. Payton, Sergeant; C. Mellott, Major, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-07-08
Citations: 606 F. App'x 128
Docket Number: No. 15-6116
Parties: Charles Robert CANTER, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard GRAHAM, Jr., Warden; James Titchnell, Case Manager Manager; T. Humbertson, Case Manager Specialist; J. Wilson, Case Manager Supervisor; B. Payton, Sergeant; C. Mellott, Major, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 606
Pages: 128–128

Head Matter:
Charles Robert CANTER, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard GRAHAM, Jr., Warden; James Titchnell, Case Manager Manager; T. Humbertson, Case Manager Specialist; J. Wilson, Case Manager Supervisor; B. Payton, Sergeant; C. Mellott, Major, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15-6116.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 7, 2015.
Decided: July 8, 2015.
Charles Robert Canter, III, Appellant Pro Se.
Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Charles Robert Canter, III, appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Canter v. Graham, No. 8:14-cv-03995-GJH (D.Md. Jan. 8, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.