Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kunta Kenta REDD, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-02-28
Citations: 678 F. App'x 147
Docket Number: No. 16-7771
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kunta Kenta REDD, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 678
Pages: 147–147

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kunta Kenta REDD, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-7771
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: February 23, 2017
Decided: February 28, 2017
Kunta Kenta Redd, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Gordon James, Scott Andrew Lemmon, Timothy Severo, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kunta Kenta Redd appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of sentence, denying his motions for leave to appeal and for privacy protection, and granting the Government's motion to seal. Redd confines his relevant arguments on appeal to the district court's denial of § 3582(c)(2) relief. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error in this ruling. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Redd, No. 7:08-cr-00043-D-1 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 14, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED