Case Name: Caroline Fink, Widow Pfaeflin, Rudolph Fink et al., Intervenors, v. D. Bullerdieck, Executor, and City of New Orleans
Court: Louisiana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1860-11
Citations: 15 La. Ann. 624
Docket Number: 
Parties: Caroline Fink, Widow Pfaeflin, Rudolph Fink et al., Intervenors, v. D. Bullerdieck, Executor, and City of New Orleans.
Judges: 
Reporter: Louisiana Annual Reports
Volume: 15
Pages: 624–624

Head Matter:
Caroline Fink, Widow Pfaeflin, Rudolph Fink et al., Intervenors, v. D. Bullerdieck, Executor, and City of New Orleans.
Decision in tlio case of F. R. Mrilc, et al. v. Executor J. D. Einlc, 12 An., affirmed.
APPEAL from the Second District Court of New Orleans, Morgan, J.
P. E. Bonford, for plaintiff and appellant.
Durant & Honor and J. J. Michel, for defendant.

Opinion:
Merrick, O. J.
This case presents the same question which was decided in the cases of F. H. Fink et al. v. Executor of J. D. Fink, 12 An. 301, and Pfaeflin v. Bullerdieck, decided in January, 1860, not reported.
We see no reason to depart from those decisions.
It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment appealed from be affirmed, with costs.