Case Name: BAKER v. BREM
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 1900-12-19
Citations: 127 N.C. 322
Docket Number: 
Parties: BAKER v. BREM.
Judges: 
Reporter: North Carolina Reports
Volume: 127
Pages: 322–325

Head Matter:
BAKER v. BREM.
(December 19, 1900.)
Services of Process — Summons—Justice of the Peace— Sheriff — Qoroner-—Special Officers — Acts 1891, Ghap. 173.
Acts 1891, cñ. 17S, providing for deputizing special officers where the Sheriff and Coroner are interested, apply to Courts of Justices of, the Reace.
PtstttioN to Reheae.
Petition granted.
Eor former opinion, see 126 N. C., 367.
J. T. Perkins, for petitioner.
Avery & Erwin, in opposition.

Opinion:
Clark, J.
When this case was decided, our attention was called to chap. 173, Acts 1891, and it was overlooked by us. That statute provides: "If, at any time, the sheriff of any county be interested in or a party to any proceeding in any court, or'if the coroner be interested in any such proceeding, then the court from which such process'issues shall appoint some suitable person to act as special coroner to execute such process," etc. This language, by its very terms, applies to "any proceedings in any court." It is not restricted to the Superior Courts, but the contrary intent is expressed. Here, the sheriff being insane, and the coroner being interested in this action before a Justice of the Peace, that officer, under authority of this statute, deputized an officer specially to serve the summons, and he made due service as such. The petition to rehear should be granted, and the judgment below affirmed.