Case Name: In re Application of Grossman
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1993-06-16
Citations: 66 Ohio St. 3d 372
Docket Number: No. 93-362
Parties: In re Application of Grossman.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 66
Pages: 372–375

Head Matter:
In re Application of Grossman.
[Cite as In re Application of Grossman (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 372.]
(No. 93-362
Submitted April 6, 1993
Decided June 16, 1993.)
Michael D. Juhola, for applicant.
Vorys, Safer, Seymour & Pease, Charles A. Schneider and Susan M. Barrett, for the Columbus Bar Association.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We concur in the board's findings and adopt its recommendation. The applicant has failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that he possesses the requisite character, fitness, and moral qualifications for admission to the practice of law. Neal L. Grossman's application to register as a candidate for admission to the practice of law is denied, and he is permanently prohibited from reapplying to take the Ohio bar examination and from reapplying for admission to the practice of law in Ohio.
Application denied.
Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.