Case Name: Giardino Corporation et al., Respondents, v. J. Harry Goldblatt, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1952-03-03
Citations: 279 A.D. 912
Docket Number: 
Parties: Giardino Corporation et al., Respondents, v. J. Harry Goldblatt, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 279
Pages: 912–912

Head Matter:
Giardino Corporation et al., Respondents, v. J. Harry Goldblatt, Appellant.

Opinion:
Although the granting of the motion did not impinge upon the constitutional right to a trial by jury (Steck v. Colorado Fuel & Iron Co., 142 N. Y. 236; 4 Carmody on New York Practice, p. 2692, and cases cited) the record did not warrant the granting of a compulsory order of reference on the ground that the examination of a long account was necessary within the meaning of section 466 of the Civil Practice Act, under long-settled authority. (Davidson v. Sterngass, 279 App. Div. 875, and cases cited therein; Untermyer v. Beinhauer, 105 N. Y. 521.) Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.