Case Name: MENTOR GRAPHICS CORPORATION, an Oregon Corporation, Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant v. EVE-USA, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Synopsys Emulation and Verification S.A.S., Formed Under the Laws of France, Synopsys, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-09-01
Citations: 870 F.3d 1298
Docket Number: 2015-1470; 2015-1554; 2015-1556
Parties: MENTOR GRAPHICS CORPORATION, an Oregon Corporation, Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant v. EVE-USA, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Synopsys Emulation and Verification S.A.S., Formed Under the Laws of France, Synopsys, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Defendants-Appellants
Judges: Before PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, LOURIE, DYK, MOORE, O’MALLEY, REYNA, WALLACH, TARANTO, CHEN, HUGHES, and STOLL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 870
Pages: 1298–1306

Head Matter:
MENTOR GRAPHICS CORPORATION, an Oregon Corporation, Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant v. EVE-USA, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Synopsys Emulation and Verification S.A.S., Formed Under the Laws of France, Synopsys, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Defendants-Appellants
2015-1470
2015-1554
2015-1556
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
September 1, 2017
Mark E. Miller, O’Melveny & Myers LLP, San Francisco, CA, filed a response to the petition for plaintiff-cross-appellant. Also represented by Anne E. Huffsmith, Luann Loraine Simmons. '
E. Joshua Rosenkranz, Orrick, Herring-ton & Sutcliffe LLP, New York, NY, filed a petition for rehearing en banc for defendants-appellants. Also represented by Daniel A. Rubens, Andrew D. Silverman; Robert M. Loeb, Eric Shumskv, Washington, DC; Vicia L. Feeman, Travis Jensen, Scott T. Lonardo, Menlo Park, CA; William H. Wright, Los Angeles, CA; Indra Neel Chatterjee, Goodwin Procter LLP, Menlo Park, CA.
Eric E. Bensen, Garden City, NY, as amicus curiae.
Phillip R. Malone, Stanford Law School, Stanford, CA, for amici curiae Public Knowledge and Jeremy W. Bock, et al. Also represented by Jeffrey Theodore Pearlman.
Before PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, LOURIE, DYK, MOORE, O’MALLEY, REYNA, WALLACH, TARANTO, CHEN, HUGHES, and STOLL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Stoll, Circuit Judge, with whom Newman, Moore, O'Malley, Reyna, and Wallach, Circuit Judges, join, concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc.
Dyk, Circuit Judge, with whom Hughes, Circuit Judge, joins, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc.
Moore, Circuit Judge, with whom Chen, Circuit Judge, joins, concurring in the denial of panel rehearing.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellants EVE-USA, Inc., Synopsys Emulation and Verification S.A.S., and Sy-nopsys, Inc. filed a petition for rehearing en banc. A response to the petition was invited by the court and filed by the cross-appellant Mentor Graphics Corporation. Two motions for leave to file amici curiae briefs were also filed and granted by the court.
The petition, response, and briefs of am-ici curiae were referred to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter were referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service. A poll was requested, taken, and failed.
Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
The petition for panel rehearing is denied.
The petition for rehearing en banc is denied.
The mandate of the court will be issued on September 8, 2017.