Case Name: Michael J. SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Brian WILLIAMS, Warden; R. Tate, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-08-15
Citations: 480 F. App'x 880
Docket Number: No. 11-16919
Parties: Michael J. SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Brian WILLIAMS, Warden; R. Tate, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: ALARCÓN, BERZON, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 480
Pages: 880–881

Head Matter:
Michael J. SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Brian WILLIAMS, Warden; R. Tate, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 11-16919.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted'Aug. 8, 2012.
Filed Aug. 15, 2012.
Michael J. Smith, Las Vegas, NV, pro se.
Clark G. Leslie, Esquire, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, AGNV-Office of the Nevada Attorney General, Carson City, NV, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: ALARCÓN, BERZON, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Former Nevada state prisoner Michael J. Smith appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court's dismissal for failure to exhaust. Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1117 (9th Cir.2003). We affirm.
Smith contends that he is excused from exhausting his administrative remedies because he was released from prison before he filed his amended complaint. We do not consider this argument because Smith raises it for the first time on appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n. 2 (9th Cir.2009) (per curiam).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.