Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Vance Marcel GIBSON, a/k/a Reginald Hilton Belton, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-10-08
Citations: 396 F. App'x 930
Docket Number: No. 10-6344
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Vance Marcel GIBSON, a/k/a Reginald Hilton Belton, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 396
Pages: 930–930

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Vance Marcel GIBSON, a/k/a Reginald Hilton Belton, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-6344.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 30, 2010.
Decided: Oct. 8, 2010.
Vance Marcel Gibson, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Hairston, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Vance Marcel Gibson appeals the district court's orders denying his motion for a reduction of sentence filed, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006), and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's orders for the reasons stated there. See United States v. Gibson, No. 6:93-cr-00211-WLO-1 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 22 & May 11, 2010). Further, we deny Gibson's motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.