Case Name: Jasmine JEFFRIES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2013-09-17
Citations: 408 S.W.3d 349
Docket Number: No. ED 98916
Parties: Jasmine JEFFRIES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., KURT S. ODENWALD, J., and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 408
Pages: 349–349

Head Matter:
Jasmine JEFFRIES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 98916.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Sept. 17, 2013.
Timothy Forneris, Missouri Public Defender Office, St. Louis, MO for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Gregory L. Barnes, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., KURT S. ODENWALD, J., and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Jasmine Jeffries (Movant) appeals from the motion court's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Judgment (judgment) denying her amended Rule 24.035 Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).