Case Name: HOOD against ORR
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 1817-07
Citations: 1 Taylor 151
Docket Number: 
Parties: HOOD against ORR.
Judges: The rest of the Court concurred.
Reporter: North Carolina Reports
Volume: 4
Pages: 151–152

Head Matter:
HOOD against ORR.
If an a|£. peal from the County to the Superior C’rt ss not filed within the oftyUw'u^ mustbedis-missed; al-the appellant* though such omission proceeds from accident and without laches in Cut in such cases a certiorari wifl be granted;
MOTION in the Superior Court to dismiss an appeal, , . rr 7 because not brought up within the time prescribed by law. ⅛
Th& Clerk of the Superior Court died in the vacation, •. , , ’ leaving no deputy, and there was no person to, receive the appeal, from the time it was made until the first day the Superior Court.

Opinion:
Ruffin, J.
I do not think that the appeal ought to b^ sustained in this case. If the appellant was without remedy, that might make a difference, perhaps. But he is not; for it has been usual to grant a writ of certiorari in such a case, and, indeed, in all others, where the appellant has been prevented from filing the record by accident and without his own laches. This is, therefore, rather a question of practice than of property ; and it is almost of as much Consequence that the rules oTpractice should be certain as that they should be right- The act of Assembly is -positive upon this subject; and since the case of Robertson v. Stone, the Courts have always refused to relax the rule of law,, without any regard to the causes of failure of the appellant. Tho$e decisions appear to me to be very proper, independent of the statute. For although the appellant may haye a very good excuse for not filing his appeal, and ought, therefore, not to be precluded from a new trial; yet the appellee, who knows that the cause is at an end by positive law, unless the record is removed to the Superior Court in due time, is no longer bound to look after the Case or prepare for trial, after the first failure of the appellant. If the' suit is afterwards suffered to go on, he ought to have notice of ⅛ This he gets when a certiorari is granted. But, otherwise, he ha%. no notice.
The rest of the Court concurred.
1 Hayw. 402