Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenneth Jeffery JORDAN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-11-01
Citations: 204 F. App'x 414
Docket Number: No. 03-11326
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenneth Jeffery JORDAN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 204
Pages: 414–415

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenneth Jeffery JORDAN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 03-11326.
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Decided Nov. 1, 2006.
Phillip C. Umphres, Susan B. Cowger, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Charles Kenneth Bloeser, Bloeser Law Office, Oklahoma City, OK, for Defendants Appellant.
Before BARKSDALE, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
PER CURIAM:
Kenneth Jordan appeals his sentence imposed prior to United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), under the assumption that the Sentencing Guidelines were mandatory. Jordan first raised the objection on appeal, and we review for plain error. United States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511, 516 (5th Cir.2005). Because Jordan has not pointed to anything in the record indicating that the trial judge would have sentenced him differently under an advisory sentencing regime, he cannot show plain error under Mares. Id. at 522. We therefore AFFIRM.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.