Case Name: In re CLINTON'S GUARDIANSHIP
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1936-02-18
Citations: 176 Okla. 113
Docket Number: No. 26253
Parties: In re CLINTON’S GUARDIANSHIP.
Judges: McNEILL, C. J., and RILEY, WELCH. .-PHELPS, and CORN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 176
Pages: 113–113

Head Matter:
In re CLINTON’S GUARDIANSHIP.
No. 26253.
Feb. 18, 1936.
W. F. Semple, Grady Lewis, and W. E. Foltz, for plaintiff in .error.
Walker & Lewis, Ében L. Taylor, and Gibson, Maxey & Holleman, for defendants in error.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Tbe appeal is from an order dismissing an appeal from tbe probate court to tbe district court. A motion to dismiss was sustained by tbe trial judge in the district court, but no copy of the order .of dismissal appears in tbe record.
A motion to dismiss has been filed herein for tbe reason that tbe errors complained of cannot be reviewed by transcript. A response was called for, but no response has been filed. Tbis court has held that a motion to dismiss and the proceedings bad thereon are not a part of tbe record and can only be brought to this court by a bill of exceptions or case-made. Belcher v. Wasson, 13 Okla. 648, 75 P. 1131; Ford v. McIntosh, 22 Okla. 423, 98 P. 341; Black v. Kuhn, 6 Okla. 87, 50 P. 80; McMeachan v. Christy, 3 Okla. 301, 41 P. 382.
This appeal is therefore dismissed.
McNEILL, C. J., and RILEY, WELCH. .-PHELPS, and CORN, JJ., concur.