Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fernando Q. LENNON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-09-10
Citations: 45 F. App'x 295
Docket Number: No. 02-6821
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fernando Q. LENNON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 45
Pages: 295–296

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fernando Q. LENNON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-6821.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 5, 2002.
Decided Sept. 10, 2002.
Fernando Q. Lennon, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Woodrow Hoffman, Office of the United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Fernando Q. Lennon seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and conclude on the reasoning of the district court that Lennon has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See United States v. Lennon, Nos. CR-00-81; CA-02-28-4 (E.D.Va. Apr. 19, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.