Case Name: SNIDER, Appellant, v. PODGORNOFF, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1976-08-02
Citations: 26 Or. App. 309
Docket Number: No. 21931, CA 5901
Parties: SNIDER, Appellant, v. PODGORNOFF, Respondent.
Judges: Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Langtry and Fort, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 26
Pages: 309–310

Head Matter:
Argued June 18,
reversed August 2, 1976
SNIDER, Appellant, v. PODGORNOFF, Respondent.
(No. 21931, CA 5901)
552 P2d 558
Robert VanNatta, St. Helens, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were VanNatta & Peterson, St. Helens.
David B. Williamson, St. Helens, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Williamson & Whipple, St. Helens.
Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Langtry and Fort, Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from an order reducing child support. A party who requests such a modification must allege and prove a change in circumstances of one or the other of the parties sufficient to justify the modification. Watson v. Watson, 251 Or 65, 66-67, 444 P2d 476 (1968); Hurner v. Hurner, 179 Or 349, 357, 170 P2d 720 (1946); Frothingham and Frothingham, 22 Or App 39, 537 P2d 1174 (1975). Here, no evidence was introduced concerning change of circumstances.
Reversed.