Case Name: CONTEST PROMOTIONS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO; County of San Francisco, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-04-27
Citations: 429 F. App'x 669
Docket Number: No. 10-17788
Parties: CONTEST PROMOTIONS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO; County of San Francisco, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: RYMER, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 429
Pages: 669–670

Head Matter:
CONTEST PROMOTIONS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO; County of San Francisco, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-17788.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 20, 2011.
Filed April 27, 2011.
Matthew David Hinks, Esquire, Amy Lerner Hill, Esquire, Senior Litigation, Benjamin M. Reznik, Esquire, Jeffer Man-gels Butler & Mitchell LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Thomas S. Lakritz, Esquire, Dennis J. Herrera, City, Victoria Wong, Kristen Ann Jensen, Esquire, Deputy City, City Attorney’s Office of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: RYMER, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
The City and County of San Francisco appeals the district court's order granting preliminary injunctive relief in favor of Contest Promotions, LLC. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.
Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in granting preliminary injunctive relief. The Lands Council v. McNair, 537 F.3d 981, 986 (9th Cir.2008); see Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 555 U.S. 7, 129 S.Ct. 365, 374, 172 L.Ed.2d 249 (2008) (listing factors for district court to consider); Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press Int'l., 686 F.2d 750, 752-53 (9th Cir.1982) (explaining limited scope of review). We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order granting injunctive relief in favor of Contest Promotions, LLC.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.