Case Name: CEDAR BRIDGE, L.L.C., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. MILA, INC, d/b/a Mortgage Lending Associates, Inc., Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2007-12-04
Citations: 241 S.W.3d 365
Docket Number: No. ED 89553
Parties: CEDAR BRIDGE, L.L.C., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. MILA, INC, d/b/a Mortgage Lending Associates, Inc., Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 241
Pages: 365–366

Head Matter:
CEDAR BRIDGE, L.L.C., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. MILA, INC, d/b/a Mortgage Lending Associates, Inc., Defendant/Respondent.
No. ED 89553.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Dec. 4, 2007.
Thomas A. Connelly, St. Louis, MO, for PlaintiffAppellant.
William L. Sauerwein, David W. Forth, St. Louis, MO, for Defendant/Respondent.
Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Cedar Bridge, L.L.C. (Cedar Bridge) appeals from the circuit court's grant of summary judgment in favor of MILA, Inc., d/b/a Mortgage Lending Associates, Inc. (MILA) on Cedar Bridge's petition to quiet title to real property under Section 140.330. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude there is no genuine dispute of the material facts and MILA is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. ITT Commercial Fin. Corp. v. Mid-Am. Marine Supply Corp., 854 S.W.2d 371, 377 (Mo. banc.1993). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All statutory references are to RSMo 2000, unless otherwise indicated.