Case Name: Paul McGRUDER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-04-20
Citations: 131 S.W.3d 875
Docket Number: No. ED 82324
Parties: Paul McGRUDER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 131
Pages: 875–876

Head Matter:
Paul McGRUDER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 82324.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
April 20, 2004.
Jo Ann Rotermund, Assistant Public Defender, Missouri State Public Defender System, Eastern Appellate/PCR Division, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Andrea K. Spillars, Assistant Attorney General, Lisa M. Eaton, Assistant Attor ney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Paul McGruder, appeals from the judgment dismissing as untimely, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court's judgment is based on findings of facts and conclusions of law that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only, which sets forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).