Case Name: ADRON DANIEL ASHER, Petitioner, v. STATE BOARD OF PAROLE, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1990-02-21
Citations: 100 Or. App. 592
Docket Number: CA A60194
Parties: ADRON DANIEL ASHER, Petitioner, v. STATE BOARD OF PAROLE, Respondent.
Judges: Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Newman and Deits, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 100
Pages: 592–593

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted October 27, 1989,
affirmed February 21,
reconsideration denied March 28,
petition for review denied May 22, 1990 (310 Or 70)
ADRON DANIEL ASHER, Petitioner, v. STATE BOARD OF PAROLE, Respondent.
(CA A60194)
786 P2d 1323
Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.
Douglas F. Zier, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Keith W. Wingfield, Assistant Attorney General, Salem.
Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Newman and Deits, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Petitioner seeks review of a Board of Parole order that revoked his parole. He contends that, at the time of the Board's action, he was no longer on parole, because his "good time" release date had passed. However a prisoner does not accumulate good time while on parole, and the original good time release date is suspended. Ventris v. Maass, 99 Or App 85, 781 P2d 1224 (1989), rev den 309 Or 231 (1990).
Petitioner also contends that the Board improperly denied his request for appointed counsel for the revocation hearing. Petitioner never denied that he violated the conditions of parole or presented any reason justifying appointment of counsel. The Board did not err in denying his request. ORS 144.343(3) (f).
Petitioner's remaining contention does not warrant discussion.
Affirmed.