Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. William PRADA, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2015-05-19
Citations: 462 S.W.3d 454
Docket Number: No. ED 101738
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. William PRADA, Appellant.
Judges: Before Lawrence E. Mooney, P.J., Clifford H. Ahrens, J., and Lisa Van Amburg,-J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 462
Pages: 454–455

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. William PRADA, Appellant.
No. ED 101738
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Filed: May 19, 2015
Amanda Faerber, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Daniel N. McPherson, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for Respondent.
Before Lawrence E. Mooney, P.J., Clifford H. Ahrens, J., and Lisa Van Amburg,-J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
The defendant, William Prada, appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis following his conviction by the trial court of one count of second-degree assault. The State charged the defendant with three counts of first-degree assault and three corresponding counts of armed criminal action for firing a gun in the direction of three persons in an alley.' The trial court acquitted the defendant on five of the six charges, and found him guilty of second-degree assault as to one victim. The trial court sentenced the defendant to five years of imprisonment for second-degree assault, suspended execution of his sentence, and placed him- on two years of supervised probation. Finding no error, we affirm.
An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.
We affirm the trial court's judgment. Rule 30.25(b).