Case Name: James W. Purdy, Jr., et al., Respondents, v. Guy S. Brantingham, Appellant, Impleaded with Another
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1906-02-13
Citations: 184 N.Y. 533
Docket Number: 
Parties: James W. Purdy, Jr., et al., Respondents, v. Guy S. Brantingham, Appellant, Impleaded with Another.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 184
Pages: 533–533

Head Matter:
James W. Purdy, Jr., et al., Respondents, v. Guy S. Brantingham, Appellant, Impleaded with Another.
Purdy v. Brantingham, 100 App. Div. 516, affirmed.
(Argued January 29, 1906;
decided February 13, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 30, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Alexander Thain for appellant.
Allan C. Rowe for respondents.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O'Brien, Werner, His-cock and Chase, JJ. Not voting: Edward T. Bartlett, J.