Case Name: Jack A. SCHWANER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, FORT EUSTIS, VIRGINIA, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-01-28
Citations: 119 F. App'x 565
Docket Number: No. 04-1772
Parties: Jack A. SCHWANER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, FORT EUSTIS, VIRGINIA, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 119
Pages: 565–565

Head Matter:
Jack A. SCHWANER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, FORT EUSTIS, VIRGINIA, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 04-1772.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 22, 2004.
Decided: Jan. 28, 2005.
Jack A. Schwaner, Appellant pro se.
Anita K. Henry, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Jack A. Schwaner appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to the Department of the Army on his civil action challenging a ban on commercial solicitation of students attending Advanced Individual Training at Fort Eustis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Schwaner v. Dep't of the Army, No. CA-03-125-4 (E.D.Va. May 28, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED