Case Name: Charles S. Hinchman, complainant-respondent, v. Philadelphia and Reading Railway Company, defendant-appellant
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1915-06-14
Citations: 84 N.J. Eq. 504
Docket Number: 
Parties: Charles S. Hinchman, complainant-respondent, v. Philadelphia and Reading Railway Company, defendant-appellant.
Judges: For affirmance — None.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 84
Pages: 504–504

Head Matter:
Charles S. Hinchman, complainant-respondent, v. Philadelphia and Reading Railway Company, defendant-appellant.
[Argued November 20th, 1915.
Decided June 14th, 1915.]
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Lewis.
Mr. Frank S. Katzenbach, for the appellant.
Mr. Gilbert Collins, for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
So far as the decree appealed from provides for the appointment of a receiver, and the sequestration of the property of appellant company located within the State of New Jersey,-we think it cannot be sustained. The remaining portions of the decree are justified by the facts proved; and to that extent the decree will be affirmed.
The respondent is entitled to costs.
For affirmance — None.
For reversal — None.
For modification — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Vredenburgh, White, Terhune, Williams — 13.