Case Name: In the Matter of: Manorama SHARMA, Debtor, Rashida Jaffer, Appellant, v. Manorama Sharma, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-11-26
Citations: 301 F. App'x 718
Docket Number: No. 07-55681
Parties: In the Matter of: Manorama SHARMA, Debtor, Rashida Jaffer, Appellant, v. Manorama Sharma, Appellee.
Judges: Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 301
Pages: 718–719

Head Matter:
In the Matter of: Manorama SHARMA, Debtor, Rashida Jaffer, Appellant, v. Manorama Sharma, Appellee.
No. 07-55681.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 24, 2008.
Filed Nov. 26, 2008.
Rashida Jaffer, Esq., Fullerton, CA, pro se.
D. Edward Hays, Rus, Miliband, Williams & Smith, Irvine, CA, for Appellee.
Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Rashida Jaffer, a California attorney, appeals pro se from the bankruptcy court's order dismissing her adversary action for failure to comply with local bankruptcy rules and the bankruptcy court's instructions. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d)(1). We review for abuse' of discretion, Malone v. U.S. Postal Serv., 833 F.2d 128 (9th Cir.1987), and we affirm.
The bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing the action, with prejudice, after giving Jaffer multiple warnings and considering the factors set forth in Malone. Id.
Jaffer's remaining contentions are unpersuasive.
Jaffer's motion to augment the record is granted.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.