Case Name: FREDERICK HUBERT ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. C. FRANKLIN WILSON, JUDGE, ETC., RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1927-10-17
Citations: 104 N.J.L. 172
Docket Number: 
Parties: FREDERICK HUBERT ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. C. FRANKLIN WILSON, JUDGE, ETC., RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 104
Pages: 172–172

Head Matter:
FREDERICK HUBERT ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. C. FRANKLIN WILSON, JUDGE, ETC., RESPONDENT.
Argued May 17, 1927
Decided October 17, 1927.
For the appellants, Elmer W. Bomine. .
For the respondent, Charles A. Bathbun.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Parker, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.