Case Name: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. STANLEY PERWIN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1973-06-19
Citations: 124 N.J. Super. 312
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. STANLEY PERWIN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 124
Pages: 312–313

Head Matter:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. STANLEY PERWIN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Submitted June 4, 1973
Decided June 19, 1973.
Before Judges Collester, Leonard and Halpern.
Mesrs. Silverman, Bergstein & Walsh, attorneys for appellant (Mr. Richard Aloysius Walsh, on the brief).
Mr. Joseph P. Lordi, Essex County Prosecutor, attorney for respondent (Mr. R. Benjamin Cohen, Assistant Prosecutor, of counsel; Mr. Peter N. Gilbreth, Legal Assistant, on the brief).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Following a four-month jury trial defendant (Perwin) and three others were convicted of conspiracy to obtain money under false pretenses and defendant and one other were convicted of obtaining money under false pretenses. We affirmed. State v. Yormark, 117 N. J. Super. 315 (App. Div. 1971). Certification was denied, 60 N. J. 138 (1972), as was certiorari, 407 U. S. 925, 92 S. Ct. 2459, 32 L. Ed. 2d 812 (1972).
About 14 months subsequent to their convictions, defendant and Mulvaney moved for a new trial, based upon newly discovered evidence. Testimony was taken and the motion denied. Perwin appeals.
We affirm essentially for the reasons stated by the trial judge in his written opinion reported at 120 N. J. Super. 177 (Law Div. 1972).
Affirmed.