Case Name: In the Matter of the Compensation of Chuck Northcutt, Claimant. Chuck NORTHCUTT, Petitioner, v. BJ's ICE CREAM PARLOR and SAIF Corporation, Respondents
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1992-07-01
Citations: 113 Or. App. 748
Docket Number: WCB 89-14670; CA A68207
Parties: In the Matter of the Compensation of Chuck Northcutt, Claimant. Chuck NORTHCUTT, Petitioner, v. BJ’s ICE CREAM PARLOR and SAIF Corporation, Respondents.
Judges: Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Deits and Durham, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 113
Pages: 748–749

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted May 18,
reversed and remanded for reconsideration July 1, 1992
In the Matter of the Compensation of Chuck Northcutt, Claimant. Chuck NORTHCUTT, Petitioner, v. BJ’s ICE CREAM PARLOR and SAIF Corporation, Respondents.
(WCB 89-14670; CA A68207)
832 P2d 52
Edward J. Harri, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner. On the brief were Donald M. Hooton and Malagon, Moore, Johnson & Jensen, Eugene.
David L. Runner, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.
Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Deits and Durham, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board that denied him attorney fees to be paid by SAIF in addition to compensation. SAIF concedes that the Board erred under the 1991 amendment to ORS 656.386(1). We agree with SAIF's concession.
Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.