Case Name: CHARLES F. KRAEMER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CITY OF NEWARK, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1935-10-09
Citations: 115 N.J.L. 519
Docket Number: 
Parties: CHARLES F. KRAEMER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CITY OF NEWARK, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 115
Pages: 519–520

Head Matter:
CHARLES F. KRAEMER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CITY OF NEWARK, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Argued May 23, 1935
Decided October 9, 1935.
For the appellant, Louis A. Fast.
For the respondent, Frank A. Boettner and Thomas M. Kane.

Opinion:
Pee Cueiam.
We affirm the judgment of the Supreme Court for the reasons stated in the opinion filed therein, except that we find it unnecessary to determine whether the appellant was an officer of the city of Newark and therefore make no suggestion as to the fact thereon.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.