Case Name: Barbara Boyle WARNER, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Sterling Jay WARNER, Defendant and Appellant
Court: Utah Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Utah
Decision Date: 1979-01-11
Citations: 590 P.2d 314
Docket Number: No. 15607
Parties: Barbara Boyle WARNER, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Sterling Jay WARNER, Defendant and Appellant.
Judges: ELLETT, C. J., and WILKINS, MAU-GHAN and HALL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Pacific Reporter 2d
Volume: 590
Pages: 314–315

Head Matter:
Barbara Boyle WARNER, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Sterling Jay WARNER, Defendant and Appellant.
No. 15607.
Supreme Court of Utah.
Jan. 11, 1979.
Arthur J. Ritter, Salt Lake City, for defendant and appellant.
R. Paul Van Dam, Salt Lake County Atty., Gerald M. Conder, Deputy Salt Lake County Atty., Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and respondent.

Opinion:
CROCKETT, Justice:
The Department of Social Services (herein Social Services) joined as plaintiff in this action, seeking reimbursement for public assistance it had rendered to plaintiff and two minor children of the parties. Pursuant to various supplemental proceedings to the divorce action, the recital of the detail of which can be spared here, the trial court rendered judgment against the defendant in the sum of $1,600 for unpaid support money.
The propriety of Social Services joining in said action and obtaining the judgment for the purposes indicated has been recognized in the cases of Bartholomew v. Bartholomew and Reeves v. Reeves. Furthermore, the defendant was personally served with the Order to Show Cause, upon which the hearing was had and he was represented by counsel at that hearing. At that time, the court denied the defendant's motion to strike the Order to Show Cause based on a claimed lack of notice and the judgment complained of was entered.
We are not persuaded that there was any error or impropriety in the proceeding, nor that any interference with the actions of the trial court is justified.
Affirmed. Costs to plaintiffs (respondents).
ELLETT, C. J., and WILKINS, MAU-GHAN and HALL, JJ., concur.
. It is significant to note that the record of this proceeding shows that there is also a subsequent judgment for $1,725, entered on February 14, 1978, from which no appeal has been taken and that such subsequent judgment has thus become final. Consequently, the present appeal challenging the prior judgment appears to be moot.
. Utah, 548 P.2d 238 (1976).
. Utah, 556 P.2d 1267 (1976).