Case Name: Helen Joan Wehling, appellant, v. Daniel E. Wehling, appellee
Court: Nebraska Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Nebraska
Decision Date: 1987-01-16
Citations: 224 Neb. 515
Docket Number: No. 85-546
Parties: Helen Joan Wehling, appellant, v. Daniel E. Wehling, appellee.
Judges: Krivosha, C.J., Boslaugh, White, Hastings, Caporale, Shanahan, and Grant, JJ.
Reporter: Nebraska Reports
Volume: 224
Pages: 515–515

Head Matter:
Helen Joan Wehling, appellant, v. Daniel E. Wehling, appellee.
398 N.W.2d 726
Filed January 16, 1987.
No. 85-546.
John W. Ballew, Jr., of Raymond, Olsen, Ediger & Ballew, P.C., for appellant.
Mark S. Trustin of Stehlik, Smith, Trustin & Schweer, and, on brief, Herbert M. Sampson III of Sampson & Forney, for appellee.
Krivosha, C.J., Boslaugh, White, Hastings, Caporale, Shanahan, and Grant, JJ.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Helen Joan Wehling appeals a judgment of the district court dissolving her marriage to Daniel E. Wehling in which the property was divided, but no alimony was awarded. The failure to order alimony and the award of property made are assigned as errors.
We have reviewed the record de novo, as we are required, to determine whether the district court abused its discretion. See Vitosh v. Vitosh, ante p. 196, 397 N.W.2d 35 (1986). Our review leads us to the conclusion that the district court did not abuse its discretion, and therefore its judgment should be affirmed.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.