Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nigel GRAY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-10-12
Citations: 250 F. App'x 968
Docket Number: No. 07-11014
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nigel GRAY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 250
Pages: 968–968

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nigel GRAY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-11014
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Oct. 12, 2007.
Nathan Dorian Clark, Coral Reef Law Offices, P.A., Miami, FL, for Defendants Appellant.
Anne R. Schultz, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Before BLACK, MARCUS and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Nathan D. Clark, appointed counsel for Nigel Gray in this appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Gray's sentence is AFFIRMED.