Case Name: Arthur O. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James A. BEATY, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-05-08
Citations: 8 F. App'x 278
Docket Number: No. 01-1194
Parties: Arthur O. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James A. BEATY, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 8
Pages: 278–278

Head Matter:
Arthur O. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James A. BEATY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 01-1194.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 10, 2001.
Decided May 8, 2001.
Arthur O. Armstrong, pro se.
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Arthur O. Armstrong appeals a district court order denying a motion for leave to file a complaint. We have reviewed the district court order and find the appeal frivolous. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Armstrong v. Beaty, No. MISC-01-13-1 (M.D.N.C. filed Jan. 25, 2001; entered Jan. 26, 2001). We also deny Armstrong's motion for summary judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.