Case Name: KWAI FUN WONG; Wu-Wei Tien Tao Association, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. David V. BEEBE, a former Immigration and Naturalization Service (n.k.a. Department of Homeland Security) Official; United States of America, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-07-13
Citations: 795 F.3d 925
Docket Number: No. 10-36136
Parties: KWAI FUN WONG; Wu-Wei Tien Tao Association, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. David V. BEEBE, a former Immigration and Naturalization Service (n.k.a. Department of Homeland Security) Official; United States of America, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: ALEX KOZINSKI, HARRY PREGERSON, A. WALLACE TASHIMA, M. MARGARET MCKEOWN, WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, MARSHA S. BERZON, RICHARD R. CLIFTON, JAY S. BYBEE, CARLOS T. BEA, MILAN D. SMITH, JR. and MARY H. MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 795
Pages: 925–926

Head Matter:
KWAI FUN WONG; Wu-Wei Tien Tao Association, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. David V. BEEBE, a former Immigration and Naturalization Service (n.k.a. Department of Homeland Security) Official; United States of America, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 10-36136.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
July 13, 2015.
Beth Creighton, Creighton & Rose, PC, Thomas Martin Steenson, Tom Steenson, Portland, OR, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
James George Bartolotto, Anne Murphy, Barbara L. Herwig, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Kelly A. Zus-man, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Portland, OR, R. Joseph Sher, Assistant U.S., United States Attorney, Alexandria, VA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: ALEX KOZINSKI, HARRY PREGERSON, A. WALLACE TASHIMA, M. MARGARET MCKEOWN, WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, MARSHA S. BERZON, RICHARD R. CLIFTON, JAY S. BYBEE, CARLOS T. BEA, MILAN D. SMITH, JR. and MARY H. MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
In light of the Supreme Court's opinion affirming the judgment of this court and remanding for further proceedings, see United States v. Kwai Fun Wong, — U.S. —, 135 S.Ct. 1625, 191 L.Ed.2d 533 (2015), we in turn REMAND this case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the opinions of this court and the Supreme Court.