Case Name: CONSUMERS INSURANCE USA, INC., Plaintiff/Respondent, v. John HOFF and Chrissy Hoff d/b/a Hoff Auto and Transmission, Defendants, and Justin Boyer, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-12-18
Citations: 388 S.W.3d 597
Docket Number: No. ED 98125
Parties: CONSUMERS INSURANCE USA, INC., Plaintiff/Respondent, v. John HOFF and Chrissy Hoff d/b/a Hoff Auto and Transmission, Defendants, and Justin Boyer, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and LISA VAN AMBURG, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 388
Pages: 597–597

Head Matter:
CONSUMERS INSURANCE USA, INC., Plaintiff/Respondent, v. John HOFF and Chrissy Hoff d/b/a Hoff Auto and Transmission, Defendants, and Justin Boyer, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 98125.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Dec. 18, 2012.
Jeffrey K. Suess, Heather Hays, Ryn-earson, Suess, Schnurbusch & Champion, LLC, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Matthew J. Sauter, Sauter Sullivan LLC, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and LISA VAN AMBURG, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from the entry of summary judgment in plaintiffs favor. No error of law appears. ITT Commercial Finance v. Mid-Am. Marine, 854 S.W.2d 871, 376 (Mo. banc 1993).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).