Case Name: In the Interest of J.A.D. and R.L.M. M.W.M. and M.C.M., Appellants, v. S.M.M., Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1994-05-17
Citations: 875 S.W.2d 252
Docket Number: No. 64724
Parties: In the Interest of J.A.D. and R.L.M. M.W.M. and M.C.M., Appellants, v. S.M.M., Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 875
Pages: 252–252

Head Matter:
In the Interest of J.A.D. and R.L.M. M.W.M. and M.C.M., Appellants, v. S.M.M., Respondent.
No. 64724.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
May 17, 1994.
Lindell P. Dunivan, Farmington, for appellants.
No appearance for respondent.
Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Petitioners appeal from the dismissal, at the end of petitioners' evidence, of their action for the transfer of custody of J.A.D. and R.L.M., two minor children. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).