Case Name: Catherine E. Gain, as Executrix, etc., of Mary Belle Hilke, Deceased, Respondent, v. Edward A. Dunn, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1935-03
Citations: 243 A.D. 849
Docket Number: 
Parties: Catherine E. Gain, as Executrix, etc., of Mary Belle Hilke, Deceased, Respondent, v. Edward A. Dunn, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 243
Pages: 849–849

Head Matter:
Catherine E. Gain, as Executrix, etc., of Mary Belle Hilke, Deceased, Respondent, v. Edward A. Dunn, Appellant.

Opinion:
Motion to dismiss complaint on promissory note, under rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice. The plaintiff alleges a written statement by defendant as follows: " I have my good health — and if I can get going again the bankruptcy will mean nothing to me — every dollar I owe will be paid." This does not amount to a new promise. Order reversed, on the law and facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted. Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ., concur.