Case Name: Frizzy Hairstylists, Inc., Respondent, v. Eagle Star Insurance Company, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1977-11-14
Citations: 93 Misc. 2d 59
Docket Number: 
Parties: Frizzy Hairstylists, Inc., Respondent, v Eagle Star Insurance Company, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 93
Pages: 59–60

Head Matter:
Frizzy Hairstylists, Inc., Respondent, v Eagle Star Insurance Company, Appellant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
November 14, 1977
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Weintraub & Fass (Harry Fass and Joseph P. Axler of counsel), for appellant. Richard Creditor for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Judgment unanimously modified by deleting therefrom the award for punitive damages; and, as so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs.
The complaint herein merely alleges that defendant refused to pay under the terms of a policy issued to the plaintiff after due demand therefor was made. It is the opinion of this court that there can be no recovery for punitive damages herein (M. S. R. Assoc. v Consolidated Mut. Ins. Co., 58 AD2d 858; see, also, Garrity v Lyle Stuart, Inc., 40 NY2d 354, 358; Dembar v Reynolds & Co., 40 Misc 2d 84). While the conduct of the carrier herein is not to be condoned, its punishment is more properly within the province and jurisdiction of the State Superintendent of Insurance (see Insurance Law, § 5, 40-d, 274).
Concur: Pino, P. J., Rinaldi and Buschmann, JJ.