Case Name: COLUMBUS, (City), Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COHEN, Defendant-Appellee
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1943-10-21
Citations: 45 Ohio Law Abs. 64
Docket Number: No. 3645
Parties: COLUMBUS, (City), Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COHEN, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: BARNES, P. J., HORNBECK and GEIGER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 45
Pages: 64–64

Head Matter:
COLUMBUS, (City), Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COHEN, Defendant-Appellee.
Ohio Appeals, Second District, Franklin County.
No. 3645.
Decided October 21, 1943.
Paul C. Hicks, Columbus, for defendant-appellee.
John L. Davies, City Attorney, and Charles R. Petree, City Prosecutor, Columbus, for plaintiff-appellant.

Opinion:
OPINION
BY THE COURT:
The above-entitled cause is now being determined on defendant-appellee's motion for rehearing. Grounds were set out under four separately numbered and stated specifications. Counsel has followed the form usually used in motions for new trial and no memoranda or brief accompanies the motion.
1 We find nothing in the specification that was not eonsidered by us before we signed the original opinion, and therefore, the same will be overruled.
BARNES, P. J., HORNBECK and GEIGER, JJ., concur.