Case Name: Michael BYRD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1997-07-02
Citations: 695 So. 2d 1310
Docket Number: No. 97-553
Parties: Michael BYRD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: WEBSTER, MICKLE and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 695
Pages: 1310–1311

Head Matter:
Michael BYRD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 97-553.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
July 2, 1997.
Michael Byrd, Appellant, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Michael Byrd, the defendant, appeals the trial court's order summarily denying his postconviction motion under rule 3.850 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The order recites that the defendant's claims are conclusively refuted by attached portions of the record, but the portions of the record to which the court referred were not attached. Because the defendant has asserted a facially sufficient claim, the trial court erred in summarily denying the motion. Fla.R.CrimJP. 3.850(d). We reverse and remand this cause to the trial court for attachment of those portions of the record that conclusively refute appellant's claims or an evidentiary hearing. Hall v. State, 608 So.2d 650 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Wells v. State, 598 So.2d 259 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Oehling v. State, 659 So.2d 1226 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).
Reversed and remanded.
WEBSTER, MICKLE and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.