Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Xavier CANO, a.k.a. Xavier Edgardo Cano, a.k.a. Javier, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-06-17
Citations: 528 F. App'x 743
Docket Number: No. 12-50151
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Xavier CANO, a.k.a. Xavier Edgardo Cano, a.k.a. Javier, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: HAWKINS, McKEOWN, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 528
Pages: 743–743

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Xavier CANO, a.k.a. Xavier Edgardo Cano, a.k.a. Javier, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-50151.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 10, 2013.
Filed June 17, 2013.
Jayne Kim, Curtis A. Kin, Esquire, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Wendy T. Wu, Central District of California, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Vicki Marolt Buchanan, Esquire, Sono-ma, CA, for Defendan1>-Appellant.
Xavier Cano, Folkston, GA, pro se.
Before: HAWKINS, McKEOWN, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Xavier Cano appeals from the district court's judgment and challenges the 70-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute and distribution of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Cano's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Cano the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Cano waived his right to appeal five specified issues related to his sentence. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the appeal waiver or as to any sentencing issue that would be outside the scope of the appeal waiver.
Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.