Case Name: Wayne S. FEUERHAHN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FIRST USA BANK, Defendant-Appellee, and Trans Union; et al., Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-11-15
Citations: 22 F. App'x 786
Docket Number: No. 01-55311; D.C. No. CV-00-03465-CM
Parties: Wayne S. FEUERHAHN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FIRST USA BANK, Defendant-Appellee, and Trans Union; et al., Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 22
Pages: 786–787

Head Matter:
Wayne S. FEUERHAHN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FIRST USA BANK, Defendant-Appellee, and Trans Union; et al., Defendants.
No. 01-55311.
D.C. No. CV-00-03465-CM.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 5, 2001 .
Decided Nov. 15, 2001.
Before BROWNING, KLEINFELD, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Wayne Feuerhahn appeals the district court's judgment dismissing his action which alleged defendants violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1681b(a)(l)-(7), and the Fair Debt Collections Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692(a)(6)(A), pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we vacate and remand for further proceedings.
We review for abuse of discretion a district court's dismissal pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 4(m). Wei v. Hawaii, 763 F.2d 370, 371 (9th Cir.1985). The district court abused its discretion by dismissing Feuer-hahn's action because he had good cause for failing to timely serve the summons and complaint. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m); Wei, 763 F.2d at 371.
VACATED AND REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
. The former Rule 4(j), cited by the court in Wei, was published as Rule 4(m) by the 1993 amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.