Case Name: COPELAND'S ADMINISTRATOR v. REESE
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1834-11
Citations: 1 Wright 728
Docket Number: 
Parties: COPELAND'S ADMINISTRATOR v. REESE.
Judges: JUDGES — COLLETT AND WRIGHT.
Reporter: Reports of cases at law and in chancery, decided by the Supreme court of Ohio, during the years 1831, 1832, 1833, 1834.
Volume: 1
Pages: 754–755

Head Matter:
FAIRFIELD COUNTY
NOVEMBER TERM, 1834.
JUDGES — COLLETT AND WRIGHT.
COPELAND'S ADMINISTRATOR v. REESE.
Sci. fa. to make administrator party to a judgment — interest.
Where part of a judgment at law is enjoined, the remainder is as if the judgment was originally for the sum not enjoined, and draws interest from the date of the judgment.
An administrator may revive a judgment recovered hy his intestate for the sum due, and he made a party to it.
Scire eacias to make the administrator party to a judgment recovered by his intestate in his lifetime. Pleas, 1. Nul tiel record: 2. Notice that the defendant in the life time of Copeland obtained a decree in chancery, enjoining him from collecting more than $450 of said judgment, and that since said injunction the defendant had paid the $450 in full.
Irvin for the plaintiff.
Hunter, for the defendant,
insisted that no more could be coU lected on the judgment than the $450, without interest, because the injunction restrained them from collecting more than $450; but if interest were to be allowed, it could only be counted from the date of the injunction, not from the judgment.

Opinion:
BY THE COURT.
The injunction left the sum of $450 of the original judgment to be collected and operated to satisfy the residue of the judgment. It remained as if originally entered for $450 only, and that sum drew interest from the date of the judgment.
There is found to be now due on the judgment $201, principal and interest. Judgment, that the administrator be made party to the judgment, and have execution for said sum and costs.