Case Name: Sandeep Randhawa SINGH, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-03-02
Citations: 313 F. App'x 992
Docket Number: No. 06-70741
Parties: Sandeep Randhawa SINGH, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: BEEZER, FERNANDEZ, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 313
Pages: 992–992

Head Matter:
Sandeep Randhawa SINGH, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 06-70741.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 18, 2009.
Filed March 2, 2009.
Peter Singh, Esquire, Peter Singh & Associates, P.C., Fresno, CA, for Petitioner.
Glen T. Jaeger, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Le-fevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
Before: BEEZER, FERNANDEZ, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Sandeep Randhawa Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge's decision denying his application under 8 U.S.C. § 1186a(c)(4)(B) for a waiver of the requirement to file a joint petition with his former wife to remove the conditional basis of his lawful permanent resident status. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the denial of the waiver, Oropezo-Wong v. Gonzales, 406 F.3d 1135, 1147 (9th Cir.2005), and we deny the petition for review.
Singh failed to provide any documents or third-party testimony proving the bona fides of his marriage. Substantial evidence therefore supports the agency's determination that his marriage was not entered into in good faith. See id. at 1148; see also 8 C.F.R. § 216.4(a)(5) (application for waiver shall be accompanied by documentation showing that the marriage was not entered into for the purpose of evading immigration laws).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.