Case Name: HERNDON v. ARMSTRONG et al.
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1934-11-27
Citations: 148 Or. 602
Docket Number: 
Parties: HERNDON v. ARMSTRONG et al.
Judges: Rossman and Bailey, JJ., not sitting.
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 148
Pages: 602–610

Head Matter:
Motion to dismiss appeal denied October 2;
argued October 30;
affirmed November 27, 1934
HERNDON v. ARMSTRONG et al.
(36 P. (2d) 184, 38 P. (2d) 44)
Raley, Raley & Warner, John F. Kilkenny, and 8. D. Peterson, all of Pendleton, for the motion.
Don T. Randall, of Freewater, and Homer I. Watts, of Athena, opposed.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this case, the respondent moves to dismiss the appeal upon the same grounds as in Winter v. Heyden, 149 Or. — (36 P. (2d) 183), just decided. The facts are substantially the same in both cases and the same rules of law are controlling in both easés. The motion to dismiss must, therefore, be denied and the appellant will be permitted to substitute certified copies thereof in lieu of the original notice of appeal, undertaking on appeal and judgment appealed from, as in the Winter case, and it is so ordered.
Argued on the merits at Pendleton October 30; affirmed November 27, 1934