Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose ROJAS-DUQUE, also known as Jose Rojas, also known as Rafael Carreno, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-09-28
Citations: 698 F. App'x 179
Docket Number: No. 16-20757 Summary Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose ROJAS-DUQUE, also known as Jose Rojas, also known as Rafael Carreno, Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 698
Pages: 179–179

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose ROJAS-DUQUE, also known as Jose Rojas, also known as Rafael Carreno, Defendant-Appellant
No. 16-20757 Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed September 28, 2017
Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Jose Rojas-Duque, Pro Se
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Jose Rojas-Duque has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rojas-Duque has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected' therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir, R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47,5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir, R. 47.5.4.