Case Name: Coker J. CLARK and Artie Mary Clark, his wife, and John T. Adkinson and Cathleen Adkinson, his wife, Appellants, v. OSCEOLA CLAY & TOP SOIL COMPANY, Ray Construction Company, Inc., a corporation, Ray Construction Company, and W. L. Ray, Jr., as executor, and also known as William L. Ray, Jr., and Nell Ray, as executrix of the Estate of William L. Ray, Deceased, Appellees
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1957-11-08
Citations: 99 So. 2d 869
Docket Number: 
Parties: Coker J. CLARK and Artie Mary Clark, his wife, and John T. Adkinson and Cathleen Adkinson, his wife, Appellants, v. OSCEOLA CLAY & TOP SOIL COMPANY, Ray Construction Company, Inc., a corporation, Ray Construction Company, and W. L. Ray, Jr., as executor, and also known as William L. Ray, Jr., and Nell Ray, as executrix of the Estate of William L. Ray, Deceased, Appellees.
Judges: TERRELL, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 99
Pages: 869–870

Head Matter:
Coker J. CLARK and Artie Mary Clark, his wife, and John T. Adkinson and Cathleen Adkinson, his wife, Appellants, v. OSCEOLA CLAY & TOP SOIL COMPANY, Ray Construction Company, Inc., a corporation, Ray Construction Company, and W. L. Ray, Jr., as executor, and also known as William L. Ray, Jr., and Nell Ray, as executrix of the Estate of William L. Ray, Deceased, Appellees.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Nov. 8, 1957.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 5, 1958.
Millard F. Caldwell of Caldwell, Parker, Foster & Wigginton, Tallahassee, for appellants.
R. A. Hepner of Fisher & Hepner, Pensacola, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have thoroughly examined the briefs, appendices and original record. There are numerous procedural errors which, if properly brought to the attention of the trial judge or raised in this court, might justify a reversal. Our consideration of the record, however, convinces us that' in the ultimate result the trial judge ruled correctly. Under the circumstances reflected by this record the procedural errors are either harmless or were waived in the trial court. Therefore, the judgment under assault is
Affirmed.
TERRELL, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and O'CONNELL, JJ., concur.