Case Name: Bradford EDWARDS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-04-26
Citations: 543 So. 2d 290
Docket Number: No. 4-86-2182
Parties: Bradford EDWARDS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ANSTEAD, LETTS and GARRETT, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 543
Pages: 290–290

Head Matter:
Bradford EDWARDS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4-86-2182.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
April 26, 1989.
Rehearing Denied June 14, 1989.
Gary D. Weiner, Sp. Public Defender, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and John W. Tiedemann, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. We believe the evidence was sufficient to sustain appellant's conviction. In addition, on the evidence presented, we believe a reasonable jury could have found that appellant's alleged theory of the case did not present a reasonable hypothesis of innocence. See Berriel v. State, 524 So.2d 1147 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). We also find no reversible error in the other issues raised on appeal,
ANSTEAD, LETTS and GARRETT, JJ., concur.