Case Name: SHELTON v. WALLACE
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1917-01-23
Citations: 63 Okla. 79
Docket Number: No. 8744
Parties: SHELTON v. WALLACE.
Judges: All the Justices concur.
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 63
Pages: 79–79

Head Matter:
SHELTON v. WALLACE.
No. 8744
Opinion Filed Jan. 23, 1917.
(162 Pac. 1092.)
(Syllabus by the Court.)
Appeal and Error — Perfection of Appeal— Time for Taking'.
Proceeding in error dismissed for the reason that same was not commenced within 'six months from the rendition of the judgment complained of, as required by chapter 18, Hess. Daws 1910-11.
Error from District Court. Tillman County ; Cham Jones, Assigned Judge.
Action between R. U. Shelton and R. E. Wallace. There was a judgment for the latter, and the former brings error.
Dismissed.
Wilson & Roe, for plaintiff in error.
• Mounts & Davis, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
KANE. J.
This cause comes on to be heard upon motion to dismiss, filed by the defendant in error, upon the ground that the appeal therein was not perfected within the six months allowed by law to take said appeal; that the motion for new trial was overruled by the district judge of Tillman county, Oklahoma, on the 6th day of May, 1916, and said proceeding in error was not filed in the Supreme Court of the state of Oklahoma until the 11th day of November. 1916. Chapter 18, Ress. Laws 1910-11, provides in part:
"All proceedings for reversing, vacating or modifying judgments, or final orders shall be commenced within six months from the rendition of the judgment or final order complained of."
As the proceeding in error herein was not filed until ¡the fifth day after the expiration of the time allowed by statute, the same must be dismissed.
All the Justices concur.