Case Name: PROFECTUS TECHNOLOGY LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD., Huawei Technologies USA, Inc., Huawei Device USA, Inc., Futurewei Technologies, Inc., Defendants Dell Inc., Apple Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Motorola Mobility LLC, Hewlett-Packard Company, Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-05-26
Citations: 653 F. App'x 906
Docket Number: 2015-1016, 2015-1018, 2015-1019
Parties: PROFECTUS TECHNOLOGY LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD., Huawei Technologies USA, Inc., Huawei Device USA, Inc., Futurewei Technologies, Inc., Defendants Dell Inc., Apple Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Motorola Mobility LLC, Hewlett-Packard Company, Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P., Defendants-Appellees
Judges: Before Moore, Reyna, and Wallach, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 653
Pages: 906–906

Head Matter:
PROFECTUS TECHNOLOGY LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD., Huawei Technologies USA, Inc., Huawei Device USA, Inc., Futurewei Technologies, Inc., Defendants Dell Inc., Apple Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Motorola Mobility LLC, Hewlett-Packard Company, Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P., Defendants-Appellees
2015-1016, 2015-1018, 2015-1019
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
May 26, 2016
Thomas C, Wright, Attorney, Cunningham Swaim, LLP, Steven Edward Ross, Attorney, Ross IP Group PLLC, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Roger Fulghum, Michael Hawes, Attorney, Tammy Pennington Rhodes, Baker Botts, LLP, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellee Dell Inc.
Lauren B. Fletcher, Attorney, William F. Lee, Kevin M, Yurkerwich, Attorney, Boston, MA, Brittany Blueitt Amadi, Esq., Washington, DC, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, for Defendant-Appel-lee Apple Inc.
Ahmed Jamal Davis, Michael J. McKeon, Esq, Washington, DC, John Stephen Goetz, Attorney, New York, NY, Fish & Richardson, P.C., for Defendants-Appellees Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Jonathan E. Retsky, Kurt A. Mathas, Ivan Michael Poullaos, Chicago, IL, Andrew Ryan Sommer, Washington, DC, Winston & Strawn LLP, for Defendant-Appellee Motorola Mobility LLC.
Nickolas Bohl, Margaret Elizabeth Day, Feinberg Day Alberti & Thompson LLP, Menlo Park, CA, for Defendants-Appel-lees Hewlett-Packard Company, Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.
Before Moore, Reyna, and Wallach, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
Per Curiam.
On October 27, 2015, we ordered the parties to prepare to show cause at oral argument as to why sanctions should not be imposed for violation of Federal Circuit Rule 28(d).'The parties addressed the issue of sanctions at oral argument and refiled corrected briefing and appendices following oral argument. Regarding the show-cause order on October 27, 2015, we decline to impose sanctions for violation of Federal Circuit Rule 28(d).
It Is Okdbred That:
Sanctions are not imposed.