Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael HICKS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-12-27
Citations: 260 F. App'x 557
Docket Number: No. 07-7082
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael HICKS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 260
Pages: 557–558

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael HICKS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-7082.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 20, 2007.
Decided Dec. 27, 2007.
Michael Hicks, Appellant Pro Se. Joshua Whitmarsh Drew, Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Michael Hicks appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reconsideration of his criminal conviction for assaulting a correctional officer. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hicks, No. 1:99-cr-00445-CMH (E.D. Va. June 27, 2007). We deny Hicks' motion for stay and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED