Case Name: Henschke et al. v. Moore et al., Appellants
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1917-03-19
Citations: 257 Pa. 205
Docket Number: No. 2; Appeal, No. 327
Parties: Henschke et al. v. Moore et al., Appellants
Judges: Before Brown, C. J., Potter, Moschzisker, Frazer and Walling, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 257
Pages: 205–206

Head Matter:
Henschke et al. v. Moore et al., Appellants
(No. 2).
Argued Jan. 23, 1917.
Appeal, No. 327, Jan. T., 1916, by H. R. Sack, from decree of C. P. No. 4, Philadelphia Co., March T., 1915, No. 3470, awarding an injunction, in case of Bruno Henschke and Karl Ersel, Copartners doing business under the name of Haensel & Company v. Edgar B. Moore, H. R Sack, The Penn Worsted Company, and Edgar B. Moore, Henry Frankenberg, Edward A. Morgan, Jr., and Louis F. Singleton, Copartners, doing business under the name of E. B. Moore and Company.
Before Brown, C. J., Potter, Moschzisker, Frazer and Walling, JJ.
Reversed.
.Bill in equity for an injunction. Before Finletter,. J.
The‘facts appear in Henschke et al. v. Moore et al., 257 Pa. 196.
The court on final hearing awarded an injunction as prayed for. H. R. Sack appealed.
Errors assigned were in dismissing exceptions to various findings of fact and law and the decree of the court.
Julius O. Levi, for appellant.
Henry J. Scott, for appellees.
March 19, 1917:

Opinion:
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Potter,
This is a separate appeal by H. R. Sack, from the same decree which was brought before us in the appeal at No. 297, January Term, 1916. The opinion which was there filed is conclusive of the only questions which call for consideration here. For the reasons therein set forth, the decree of the court below is reversed at the cost of the appellees.