Case Name: Candee, Smith & Howland Company, Respondent, v. The City of New York, Defendant, and James D. Murphy Company et al., Appellants
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1911-04-25
Citations: 202 N.Y. 527
Docket Number: 
Parties: Candee, Smith & Howland Company, Respondent, v. The City of New York, Defendant, and James D. Murphy Company et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 202
Pages: 527–527

Head Matter:
Candee, Smith & Howland Company, Respondent, v. The City of New York, Defendant, and James D. Murphy Company et al., Appellants.
Candee, Smith & Howland Co. v. City of New York, 135 App. Div. 915, affirmed.
(Argued April 4, 1911;
decided April 25, 1911.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 11, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien.
Arnold L. Davis, John Burlinson Coleman and Edward B. Finch for appellants.
Albert B. Hager for respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., G-ray, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscook, Chase and Collin, JJ.