Case Name: Leroy MITCHELL, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF GULFPORT, MISSISSIPPI, et al., Defendants, City of Gulfport, Mississippi; Mark Peduzzi; Todd Wallis, Defendant-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-04-09
Citations: 92 F. App'x 97
Docket Number: No. M 03-60191
Parties: Leroy MITCHELL, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF GULFPORT, MISSISSIPPI, et al., Defendants, City of Gulfport, Mississippi; Mark Peduzzi; Todd Wallis, Defendant-Appellants.
Judges: Before GARWOOD, HIGGINBOTHAM, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 92
Pages: 97–98

Head Matter:
Leroy MITCHELL, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF GULFPORT, MISSISSIPPI, et al., Defendants, City of Gulfport, Mississippi; Mark Peduzzi; Todd Wallis, Defendant-Appellants.
No. M 03-60191.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
DECIDED: April 9, 2004.
Felicia Dunn-Burkes, Gulfport, MS, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Jeffrey Scott Bruni, Gulfport, MS, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before GARWOOD, HIGGINBOTHAM, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The district court did not abuse its discretion in considering the transcript of the criminal proceeding, which transcript bears sufficient indicia of reliability. In light of that transcript, the district court determined that there are genuine issues of disputed material fact. Accordingly, we have no jurisdiction to review the claim of excessive force. Johnson v. Jones, 515 U.S. 304, 317, 115 S.Ct. 2151, 132 L.Ed.2d 238 (1995).
The appeal is DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction. Appellants' motion to supplement the record is GRANTED. We express no opinion on the merits of any claim.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.