Case Name: Trent SIMMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2001-01-31
Citations: 776 So. 2d 1033
Docket Number: No. 4D00-1220
Parties: Trent SIMMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: WARNER, C.J., POLEN and FARMER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 776
Pages: 1033–1033

Head Matter:
Trent SIMMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D00-1220.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jan. 31, 2001.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Tatjana Ostapoff, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Michael J. Neimand, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm appellant's conviction and sentence, but do not reach the merits , of his argument (whether the trial court properly refused to accept appellant's offered plea of no contest) because it does not present an appealable issue and appellant did not specifically reserve the right to appeal it. See Leonard v. State, 760 So.2d 114 (Fla.2000); Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898, 902 (Fla.1979). We also note that although appellant reserved the right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress, which the trial court recognized was a dispositive motion, he does not raise this point on appeal; therefore, we do not reach the merits of this issue either.
AFFIRMED.
WARNER, C.J., POLEN and FARMER, JJ., concur.