Case Name: In re: Jean Leonard HARRIS, Debtor, Jean Leonard Harris, Appellant, v. Sandra J. Wittman, Trustee, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-12-10
Citations: 114 F. App'x 923
Docket Number: No. 03-57023; D.C. No. CV-03-01554-MLH/AJB
Parties: In re: Jean Leonard HARRIS, Debtor, Jean Leonard Harris, Appellant, v. Sandra J. Wittman, Trustee, Appellee.
Judges: Before GOODWIN, WALLACE, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 114
Pages: 923–923

Head Matter:
In re: Jean Leonard HARRIS, Debtor, Jean Leonard Harris, Appellant, v. Sandra J. Wittman, Trustee, Appellee.
No. 03-57023.
D.C. No. CV-03-01554-MLH/AJB.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 6, 2004.
Decided Dec. 10, 2004.
Jean Leonard Harris, Rancho Santa Fe, CA, pro se.
Gary B. Rudolph, Esq., Sparber, Ferguson, Ponder and Ryan, San Diego, CA, for Appellee.
Before GOODWIN, WALLACE, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Jean Leonard Harris appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing as moot Harris's appeal from the bankruptcy court's order granting the Trustee's motion to approve the sale of personal property. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158. After de novo review, Ewell v. Diebert (In re Ewell), 958 F.2d 276, 279 (9th Cir.1992), we affirm.
The district court properly concluded that Harris's appeal was moot because the personal property had already been sold and the bankruptcy court's conclusion that Jack Swain was a good faith purchaser was not clearly erroneous. See 11 U.S.C. § 363(m); Ewell, 958 F.2d at 279, 281.
Harris's remaining contentions are without merit.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.