Case Name: BURGER CHEF SYSTEMS, INC., Petitioner, v. BURGER CHEF OF FLORIDA, INC., et al., Respondents; BURGER CHEF SYSTEMS, INC., Petitioner, v. The Honorable William C. GRIDLEY, Circuit Judge, Ninth Judicial Circuit in and for Orange County, Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1979-06-25
Citations: 375 So. 2d 8
Docket Number: No. 79-1422
Parties: BURGER CHEF SYSTEMS, INC., Petitioner, v. BURGER CHEF OF FLORIDA, INC., et al., Respondents. BURGER CHEF SYSTEMS, INC., Petitioner, v. The Honorable William C. GRIDLEY, Circuit Judge, Ninth Judicial Circuit in and for Orange County, Florida, Respondent.
Judges: DOWNEY, C. J., and LETTS and MOORE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 375
Pages: 8–8

Head Matter:
BURGER CHEF SYSTEMS, INC., Petitioner, v. BURGER CHEF OF FLORIDA, INC., et al., Respondents. BURGER CHEF SYSTEMS, INC., Petitioner, v. The Honorable William C. GRIDLEY, Circuit Judge, Ninth Judicial Circuit in and for Orange County, Florida, Respondent.
No. 79-1422.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
June 25, 1979.
Davisson F. Dunlap and William D. Palmer of Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith & Cutler, P.A., Orlando, for petitioner.
No appearance for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This cause is before us on petition for writ of mandamus, or in the alternative, for writ of common law certiorari. With respect to the mandamus, we exercise our discretion and deny the petition. Dickinson v. Stone, 251 So.2d 268 (Fla.1971). With respect to certiorari, we determine there to be an adequate remedy upon plenary appeal and accordingly deny the petition. Lynch v. City of Deerfield, 369 So.2d 1042 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979).
PETITION FOR MANDAMUS/CER-TIORARI DENIED.
DOWNEY, C. J., and LETTS and MOORE, JJ., concur.