Case Name: AI JIN WANG, Petitioner v. Michael B. MUKASEY, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-04-30
Citations: 277 F. App'x 338
Docket Number: No. 06-60937
Parties: AI JIN WANG, Petitioner v. Michael B. MUKASEY, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 277
Pages: 338–338

Head Matter:
AI JIN WANG, Petitioner v. Michael B. MUKASEY, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 06-60937.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 30, 2008.
H. Raymond Fasano, Madeo & Fasano, New York, NY, for Petitioner.
Patricia McDonald Bowman, U.S. Department of Justice, Tax Division, Thomas Ward Hussey, Director, John Clifford Cunningham, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Trey Lund, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Field Office Director, New Orleans, LA, Luis Garcia, Immigration & Customs Enforcement Chief Counsel’s Office, El Paso, TX, for Respondent.
Michael B. Mukasey, Washington, DC, pro se.
Before JONES, Chief Judge, and BARKSDALE and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Ai Jin Wang, a native of China, petitions for review of a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). The BIA summarily affirmed the Immigration Judge's (IJ's) decision to deny her application for asylum, withholding of removal, relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT), and voluntary departure.
In her petition, Wang exclusively argues the merits of her asylum application, namely, that she was forcibly sterilized in China and might be jailed upon her return because she did not pay the fine for violating the family planning policy. However, Wang does not challenge in this court, nor did she challenge in her appeal to the Board, the IJ's finding that her asylum application was untimely. Accordingly, Wang has failed to exhaust her administrative remedies, and this court lacks jurisdiction to review the IJ's denial of her application for asylum. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1); Wang v. Ashcroft, 260 F.3d 448, 452-53 (5th Cir.2001). Her petition for review is therefore DISMISSED.
Wang's motion for stay of deportation is DENIED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.