Case Name: Dolores Noia, Appellant v. Gilda De Rosa et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1981-06-18
Citations: 54 N.Y.2d 631
Docket Number: 
Parties: Dolores Noia, Appellant v Gilda De Rosa et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 54
Pages: 631–633

Head Matter:
Dolores Noia, Appellant v Gilda De Rosa et al., Respondents.
Argued May 8, 1981;
decided June 18, 1981
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Brian J. Shoot for appellant.
Philip Hoffer, Rose L. Hoffer and Raymond J. MacDonnell for respondents.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
We find no error of law in the charge to the jury given by the trial court, and the order of the Appellate Division should not be reversed on that ground.
Insofar as the determination of the Appellate Division to reverse the Trial Term's order for a new trial and to reinstate the jury verdict was based on that court's evaluation of the weight of the evidence it is not subject to our review (Donigi v American Cyanamid Co., 43 NY2d 935; Pfohl v Wipperman, 34 NY2d 597).
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.