Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cheukma Kenyata SANDERS, a/k/a Kuma, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-12-18
Citations: 500 F. App'x 227
Docket Number: No. 12-7498
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cheukma Kenyata SANDERS, a/k/a Kuma, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 500
Pages: 227–227

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cheukma Kenyata SANDERS, a/k/a Kuma, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-7498.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 13, 2012.
Decided: Dec. 18, 2012.
Cheukma Kenyata Sanders, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas A. O’Malley, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina; Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed as modified by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpubhshed opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Cheukma Kenyata Sanders appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. However, we modify the district court's opinion to note that the motion is denied because the offense level did not change, and not due to career offender status. Accordingly, we affirm on the district court reasoning as modified. United States v. Sanders, No. 5:07-cr-00050-RLV-CH-13 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 30, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.