Case Name: Edson FURTADO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John McCARTHY, State Attorney, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-04-30
Citations: 275 F. App'x 241
Docket Number: No. 08-6269
Parties: Edson FURTADO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John McCARTHY, State Attorney, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 275
Pages: 241–242

Head Matter:
Edson FURTADO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John McCARTHY, State Attorney, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 08-6269.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 24, 2008.
Decided: April 30, 2008.
Edson Furtado, Appellant Pro Se.
Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Edson Furtado appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Furtado's motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Furtado v. McCarthy, No. 8:07-cv-03375-RWT (D.Md. Jan. 31, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.