Case Name: RICHARD E. HEINLE, Appellant, v. LYANN AILEEN HEINLE, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada
Jurisdiction: Nevada
Decision Date: 1972-11-16
Citations: 88 Nev. 588
Docket Number: No. 6861
Parties: RICHARD E. HEINLE, Appellant, v. LYANN AILEEN HEINLE, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Nevada Reports
Volume: 88
Pages: 588–589

Head Matter:
RICHARD E. HEINLE, Appellant, v. LYANN AILEEN HEINLE, Respondent.
No. 6861
November 16, 1972
502 P.2d 986
Fry and Fry, of Reno, for Appellant.
Samuel B. Francovich, of Reno, for Respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION
Per Curiam:
In the circumstances disclosed by the record, we believe the trial court erred neither in its disposition of the parties' community property, NRS 125.150(1), nor in ordering appellant to pay respondent $75 per month for the support of the parties' minor daughter, NRS 125.140(2). Recounting those circumstances, which in combination are unique, would create no useful precedent.
Affirmed.