Case Name: Adolph Hill, on His Own Behalf and on Behalf of All Other Taxpayers of the City of New York Who May Come in and Join in this Action, Respondent, v. Florence E. S. Knapp, Individually and as Secretary of State of the State of New York, and Another, Appellants, Impleaded with Charles W. Berry, as Comptroller of the City of New York, and Others, Constituting and as Members of the Board of Estimate and Apportionment of the City of New York, Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1926-10-13
Citations: 218 A.D. 82
Docket Number: 
Parties: Adolph Hill, on His Own Behalf and on Behalf of All Other Taxpayers of the City of New York Who May Come in and Join in this Action, Respondent, v. Florence E. S. Knapp, Individually and as Secretary of State of the State of New York, and Another, Appellants, Impleaded with Charles W. Berry, as Comptroller of the City of New York, and Others, Constituting and as Members of the Board of Estimate and Apportionment of the City of New York, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 218
Pages: 82–83

Head Matter:
Adolph Hill, on His Own Behalf and on Behalf of All Other Taxpayers of the City of New York Who May Come in and Join in this Action, Respondent, v. Florence E. S. Knapp, Individually and as Secretary of State of the State of New York, and Another, Appellants, Impleaded with Charles W. Berry, as Comptroller of the City of New York, and Others, Constituting and as Members of the Board of Estimate and Apportionment of the City of New York, Respondents.
First Department,
October 13, 1926.
Leonard J. Obermeier, Special Deputy Attorney-General, of counsel [Albert Ottinger, Attorney-General], for the appellant Secretary of State.
John W. Hannon of counsel [John T. Loughran with him on the brief; Delehanty, Giffin, Hannon & Evans, attorneys], for the appellant Automatic Registering Machine Company.
Samuel F. Frank of counsel [Frank, Weil & Strouse, attorneys], for the plaintiff, respondent.
Denis R. O’Brien of counsel [George P. Nicholson, Corporation Counsel], for the respondents members of the Board of Estimate and Apportionment.
Leonard M. Wallstein, for the Citizens’ Union of the City of New York, as amicus curice.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We conclude that, upon the transfer by section 246 of the Election Law of the power to contract for voting machines from the board of elections to the Secretary of State, the restrictions in the letting of the contract upon the municipal authorities imposed by' section 419 of the Greater New York Charter (Laws of 1901, chap. 466, as amd. by Laws of 1922, chap. 661) were not applicable, and hence the contract cannot be held illegal. The proof does not make out any fraud in the letting of the contract by the Secretary of State, and hence the taxpayer has no cause for an injunction order to restrain its completion.
The order appealed from should, therefore, be reversed and the motion for an injunction denied.
Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Finch, McAvoy and Martin, JJ.
Order reversed and motion denied.