Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Michael G. Milczakowskyj, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2001-09-28
Citations: 286 A.D.2d 928
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael G. Milczakowskyj, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 286
Pages: 928–928

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael G. Milczakowskyj, Appellant.
[730 NYS2d 905]

Opinion:
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was informed that an enhanced sentence could be imposed if he failed to appear for sentencing, and thus his waiver of the right to appeal encompasses his contention that the enhanced sentence is unduly harsh and severe (see, People v Burnice, 272 AD2d 882, lv denied 95 NY2d 863; People v Miles, 268 AD2d 489, lv denied 95 NY2d 800). The contention of defendant in his pro se supplemental brief that County Court erred in imposing an enhanced sentence without affording him an opportunity to withdraw his plea is not preserved for our review (see, People v Monte, 242 AD2d 591). Defendant's remaining contentions in the pro se supplemental brief are encompassed by the waiver of the right to appeal. (Appeal from Judgment of Cayuga County ' Court, Contiguglia, J. — Felony Driving While Intoxicated.) Present — Green, J. P., Scudder, Kehoe, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.