Case Name: Jacob Block et al. v. Max Rehfeld
Court: Illinois Appellate Court
Jurisdiction: Illinois
Decision Date: 1891-01-16
Citations: 37 Ill. App. 534
Docket Number: 
Parties: Jacob Block et al. v. Max Rehfeld.
Judges: 
Reporter: Illinois Appellate Court Reports
Volume: 37
Pages: 534–534

Head Matter:
Jacob Block et al. v. Max Rehfeld.
Practice.
The evidence having been conflicting, this court declines to interfere with the verdict in the case presented.
[Opinion filed January 16, 1891.]
Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Elliott Anthony, Judge, presiding.
Messrs. Blum & Blum, for appellants.
Mr. B. M. Shaffner, for appellee.

Opinion:
Waterman, J.
This action was begun before a justice of the peace; after trial and judgment there it was appealed to the Superior Court, and a trial de novo was heard; from the judgment of that court this appeal is prosecuted.
The case was one in which there was a dispute as to the facts", and it is because it is insisted that the jury came to a wrong conclusion as to the facts, that we are asked to reverse the judgment below.
We are by no means sure that appellee should have had a finding in his favor, but we see no sufficient reason for overturning the verdict of the jury, and the judgment of the court is therefore affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.