Case Name: FRANK C. OSBORN v. THE UNIVERSAL LIFE INS. CO.
Court: New York Superior Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1880-04-05
Citations: 14 Jones & S. 563
Docket Number: 
Parties: FRANK C. OSBORN v. THE UNIVERSAL LIFE INS. CO.
Judges: 
Reporter: Reports of cases argued and determined in the Superior Court of the city of New York
Volume: 46
Pages: 563–563

Head Matter:
FRANK C. OSBORN v. THE UNIVERSAL LIFE INS. CO.
Before Sedgwick and Freedman, JJ.
Decided April 5, 1880.
Appeal by defendant from, an order denying the motion to strike out certain portions of the complaint as irrelevant and redundant. The order appealed from directs that the causes of action shall be separately numbered, and from that part of the order the defendant does not appeal, but the plaintiff does.
S. F. Kneeland, for plaintiff.
Sewell & Pierce, for defendant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
That part of the order from which the plaintiff appealed should be reversed, such reversal having been consented to by the defendant on the argument, and the remaining part, from which the defendant appealed, should be affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff.