Case Name: Patricia A. BEHARRY, individually and as a Candidate for re-election as County Controller, and Committee for Courthouse Reform, by Patricia A. Beharry and Peter M. Suwak, Trustees ad Litem, Appellants, v. ELECTION BOARD OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, Pennsylvania
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1986-10-01
Citations: 511 Pa. 375
Docket Number: Appeal No. 107 W.D. Appeal Dkt. 1985
Parties: Patricia A. BEHARRY, individually and as a Candidate for re-election as County Controller, and Committee for Courthouse Reform, by Patricia A. Beharry and Peter M. Suwak, Trustees ad Litem, Appellants, v. ELECTION BOARD OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, Pennsylvania.
Judges: Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, MCDERMOTT, HUTCHINSON, ZAPPALA and PAPADAKOS, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 511
Pages: 375–376

Head Matter:
514 A.2d 1373
Patricia A. BEHARRY, individually and as a Candidate for re-election as County Controller, and Committee for Courthouse Reform, by Patricia A. Beharry and Peter M. Suwak, Trustees ad Litem, Appellants, v. ELECTION BOARD OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, Pennsylvania.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued Sept. 16, 1986.
Decided Oct. 1, 1986.
Patricia A. Beharry, pro se.
Peter M. Suwak, Washington, pro se.
George Retos, Jr., Washington, for appellee.
Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, MCDERMOTT, HUTCHINSON, ZAPPALA and PAPADAKOS, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Appeal quashed for lack of jurisdiction.