Case Name: ECONOMY FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Richard and Geralyn ERCKMANN, Defendants/Appellants
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-03-05
Citations: 73 S.W.3d 769
Docket Number: No. ED 79681
Parties: ECONOMY FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Richard and Geralyn ERCKMANN, Defendants/Appellants.
Judges: Before JAMES R. DOWD, C.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 73
Pages: 769–770

Head Matter:
ECONOMY FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Richard and Geralyn ERCKMANN, Defendants/Appellants.
No. ED 79681.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
March 5, 2002.
Application for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 25, 2002.
Application for Transfer Denied May 28, 2002.
Robert Herman, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
David P. Bub, Russell F. Watters, Jen-nine D. Adamek, Brown & James, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before JAMES R. DOWD, C.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendants appeal from the trial court's entry of summary judgment in plaintiffs favor. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).