Case Name: Anthony C. BARRETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-10-22
Citations: 585 F. App'x 49
Docket Number: No. 14-7250
Parties: Anthony C. BARRETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before MOTZ, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 585
Pages: 49–50

Head Matter:
Anthony C. BARRETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 14-7250.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 16, 2014.
Decided: Oct. 22, 2014.
Anthony C. Barrett, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Campbell Altmeyer, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Anthony C. Barrett appeals the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction his action filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b)(1) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Barrett v. United States, No. 5:14-cv-00010-FPS-JSK, 2014 WL 4084187 (N.D.W.Va. Aug. 19, 2014). We dispense with oral argu ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.