Case Name: William Bixman, Appellant, v. Bertha Bixman et al., Appellees
Court: Kansas Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Kansas
Decision Date: 1938-12-24
Citations: 149 Kan. 2
Docket Number: No. 34,044
Parties: William Bixman, Appellant, v. Bertha Bixman et al., Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Kansas Reports
Volume: 149
Pages: 2–3

Head Matter:
No. 34,044
William Bixman, Appellant, v. Bertha Bixman et al., Appellees.
(85 P. 2d 590)
Opinion on post-decision motion filed December 24, 1938.
Thomas E. Joyce, of Kansas City, for the appellant.
Blake A. Williamson, James K. Cubbison and Lee Vaughan, Jr., all of Kansas City, for the appellees.

Opinion:
The opinion of the court was delivered by
HaRvey, J.:
Appellant's motion for rehearing has been considered by the court and is overruled.
Our attention is called specifically to the fact that the attorney who appeared for appellant in this court did not represent the appellant in the trial court. Since the judgment of the trial court, which we affirmed, rested largely on the opening statement of counsel, we might very well have noted the fact that there had been a change of counsel.