Case Name: In re Rutherford
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1998-05-06
Citations: 82 Ohio St. 3d 1211
Docket Number: No. 97-2727
Parties: In re Rutherford.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg - Stratton, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 82
Pages: 1211–1212

Head Matter:
In re Rutherford.
[Cite as In re Rutherford (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 1211.]
(No. 97-2727
Submitted and decided May 6, 1998.)

Opinion:
On March 6,1998, this court suspended respondent, Guy Rutherford, a.k.a. Guy Darius Rutherford, for an interim period pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(A)(4). On April 17, 1998, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline submitted an entry pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(l)(c), notifying this court that respondent no longer was in default of the child support order previously submitted to the court. Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(1), respondent, Guy Rutherford, a.k.a. Guy Darius Rutherford, Attorney Registration No. 0066032, be reinstated to the practice of law.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(2), reinstatement of respondent shall not terminate any pending disciplinary proceedings against respondent.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.
For earlier case, see In re Rutherford (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 1254, 691 N.E.2d 1049.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg - Stratton, JJ., concur.