Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Frank W. PETERING, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-07-18
Citations: 196 S.W.3d 654
Docket Number: No. WD 64748
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Frank W. PETERING, Appellant.
Judges: Before SMITH, C.J., SPINDEN and HARDWICK, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 196
Pages: 654–655

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Frank W. PETERING, Appellant.
No. WD 64748.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
July 18, 2006.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Gary E. Brotherton, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Before SMITH, C.J., SPINDEN and HARDWICK, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Frank Petering was convicted, following a bench trial, of first-degree promotion of child pornography and second-degree promotion of child pornography. On appeal, he contends: (1) the trial court erred in admitting evidence obtained pursuant to a search warrant that was unsupported by probable cause; (2) the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction for second-degree promotion of child pornography; and (3) the trial court plainly erred in admitting summaries of witness testimony, to which the parties had stipulated.
Upon review of the briefs of the record, we find no error and affirm the convictions. We have provided the parties with a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose.
AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).