Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Vidal TORRES, aka Ernesto Lombardo-Diaz, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-06-12
Citations: 67 F. App'x 447
Docket Number: No. 01-10130
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Vidal TORRES, aka Ernesto Lombardo-Diaz, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: RYMER, THOMAS and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 67
Pages: 447–448

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Vidal TORRES, aka Ernesto Lombardo-Diaz, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 01-10130.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 9, 2003.
Decided June 12, 2003.
Before: RYMER, THOMAS and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Vidal Torres appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 30-month sentence imposed for illegal reentry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Torres's attorney has filed a brief and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Torres has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Our review of the Anders brief and our independent review of the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no issues requiring further review. Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.