Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Samuel Gardner, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2006-03-07
Citations: 27 A.D.3d 482
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Samuel Gardner, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 27
Pages: 482–483

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Samuel Gardner, Appellant.
[810 NYS2d 339]

Opinion:
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lott, J.), rendered March 3, 2004, convicting him of gang assault in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant failed to timely object to the prosecutor's allegedly improper remarks during the opening statement, did not object to a curative instruction given by the trial court, and did not request a mistrial. As a result, the defendant did not preserve for appellate review his contention that certain comments made by the prosecutor during the opening statement deprived him of a fair trial (see People v Cunningham, 222 AD2d 727, 730 [1995]; People v Rizzo, 175 AD2d 221, 222 [1991]).
In any event, even assuming the prosecutor's remarks were improper, the trial court's prompt, sua sponte, curative instruction minimized any possible prejudice arising from the prosecutor's remarks (see People v Alvarez, 304 AD2d 313 [2003]; People v Wellington, 267 AD2d 56, 57 [1999]). Crane, J.P., Krausman, Rivera and Dillon, JJ., concur.