Case Name: Joseph CRUSSIAH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carol ATTIA; Anthony MaCarthy; Asmir Syed; Luc Oke; Anjana Dhar, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-02-02
Citations: 675 F. App'x 319
Docket Number: No. 16-1967
Parties: Joseph CRUSSIAH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carol ATTIA; Anthony MaCarthy; Asmir Syed; Luc Oke; Anjana Dhar, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 675
Pages: 319–320

Head Matter:
Joseph CRUSSIAH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carol ATTIA; Anthony MaCarthy; Asmir Syed; Luc Oke; Anjana Dhar, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-1967
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: January 31, 2017
Decided: February 2, 2017
Joseph Crussiah, Appellant Pro Se. Kristen Nichole Nesbitt, Lucas William Chrencik, GOODELL DEVRIES LEECH & DANN, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Joseph Crussiah appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Crussiah v. Attia, No. 8:15-cv-02516-PX, 2016 WL 3997315 (D. Md. July 26, 2016). We deny Crussiah's motion for judicial notice and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED