Case Name: LION BONDING & SURETY CO. v. KARATZ
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1922-06-30
Citations: 281 F. 1021
Docket Number: No. 6007
Parties: LION BONDING & SURETY CO. v. KARATZ.
Judges: Before CARLAND, Circuit Judge, and TRIEBER and HUNGER, District Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter
Volume: 281
Pages: 1021–1021

Head Matter:
LION BONDING & SURETY CO. v. KARATZ.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
June 30, 1922.)
No. 6007.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota. Suit by A. H. Karatz against the Lion Bonding & Surety Company. . From the judgment rendered, defendant appeals.
Affirmed.
Halleck F. Rose, Amos Thomas, and George W. Pratt, all of Omaha, Neb., and Clarence A. Davis, Atty. Gen., of Nebraska, for appellant.
Bruce W. Sanborn, William G. Graves, and Samuel G. Ordway, all of St. Paul, Minn., for appellee.
Before CARLAND, Circuit Judge, and TRIEBER and HUNGER, District Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from the final decree, involving the same questions determined by us in this cause at the December term, 1921, No. 5902 (280 Fed. 532), the opinion filed April 28, 1922, on which an appeal had been taken, under section 129 of the Judicial Code (Comp. St. § 1121), from an interlocutory order appointing a receiver of the assets of appellant. The decree in this cause was rendered and submitted to this court on the same record, as in No. 5902. For the reasons stated in the opinion in No. 5902, the decree is affirmed.