Case Name: In the Matter of the Estate of Henrietta A. Lenox, deceased
Court: New York Surrogate's Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1890-04-17
Citations: 31 N.Y. St. Rep. 959
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Estate of Henrietta A. Lenox, deceased.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 31
Pages: 959–960

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Estate of Henrietta A. Lenox, deceased.
(Surrogate’s Court, New York County,
Filed April 17, 1890.)
1. Collateral inheritance tax—Almshouses.
An institution whose inmates are required to pay for any of the benefits received is not an almshouse, not being wholly appropriated for the poor, and a legacy to it is subject to the collateral inheritance tax.
2. Same.
The New York Association for Improving the Condition of the Poor is an almshouse and exempt from the tax. While it does not furnish lodgings it provides the means therefor.
3.. Same—Libraries.
The Lenox Library is, by its charter, exempt from taxation upon its real and personal property in the same manner as that of the other incorporated public libraries of the state and hence is not subject to the tax.
Proceedings to collect collateral inheritance tax.
Townsend, Dyett & Einstein, for the Presbyterian Home for Aged Women in the city of New York; John E. Parsons, for the Board of Home Missions of the Presbyterian Church, etc.; Bangs, Stetson, Tracy & MacVeagh, for the American Bible Society; Hamilton Odell, for the executors ; Strong & Cadwalader, for the New York Association for Improving the Condition of the Poor; B. P. Dos Passos, for the district attorney; Theodore W; Myers, comptroller.

Opinion:
Hansom, S.
The district attorney objects to the report of the appraiser because he has failed to report as subject to the collateral tax legacies to the Lenox Library, Board, of Home Missions and Board of Foreign Missions of the Presbyterian church. Counsel for the Hew York Association for Improving the Condition of the Poor and for the Presbyterian Home for Aged Women object to the report because the appraiser has reported the legacies to these two institutions as subject to the tax. Each claims exemption as an almshouse. The American Bible Society objects also, and claims exemption under an order of my predecessor, entered December 30, 1887, declaring it exempt. This order was entered without notice to the comptroller, and under my ruling in the Matter of Hochster, Surr. Dec., 1889, p. 354, the comptroller not having notice, is not bound by the order.
Under the decision in the Matter of Catlin v. The Trustees of Trinity College, etc., 113 N. Y., 133; 22 N. Y. State Rep., 189, the legacy to the American Bible Society is subject to the tax. The Presbyterian Home for Aged Women charges board for the persons admitted to the home. I have repeatedly held that where inmates of such institutions are required to pay for any of the benefits received, the institution is not an almshouse, not being .appropriated wholly for the poor, and is, therefore, subject to the tax. The trustees of the general assembly of the Presbyterian Church, though appearing upon the motion day, and obtaining time to file affidavits, etc., if they desired, have not availed them.selves of this privilege. This corporation is subject to the tax. Catlin Case, supra.
By chap. 2 of the Laws of 1870 the Lenox Library was incorporated. By § 8 of said chapter, the property real and personal of the said corporation is declared to be exempt from taxation in the same manner as that of the other incorporated public libraries •of this state; thus meeting the requirements of the Catlin case, .and the appraiser was right in not reporting it as subject to the tax.
The boards of Home and Foreign missions of the Presbyterian Church each claim exemption under orders of a former surrogate. An appeal from those orders is now pending. It is unnecessary, therefore, to consider the question.
The Hew York Association for Improving the Condition of the Poor presents strong claims for exemption. It is a pure charity, •dispensing its benefits without any charge whatever. The fact that it has no house where the poor are lodged does not seem to me to take it out of the almshouse class. It keeps a place where .money is disbursed to the needy, and, while it does not furnish lodgings, it provides the means therefor. I think it is exempt
Submit appropriate order.