Case Name: MILES against TANNER
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1831-09
Citations: 3 Pen. & W. 95
Docket Number: 
Parties: MILES against TANNER.
Judges: 
Reporter: Reports of cases adjudged in the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (Penrose & Watts)
Volume: 3
Pages: 95–95

Head Matter:
MILES against TANNER.
it is not error that the Court of Common Pleas refused to grant a second' rule to' amend an appeal, and quashed it because it was defective.
Error to Warren county.
In this suit, which originated before S justice of the peace, the' jfláintiff in error was the plaintiff below. , The justice rendered á jüdgment upon a re'po'rt of referees in fat'or of the defendant/ from which the plaintiff appealed. The appeal having been fféféetive, the court granted a rule to show cause' why it should nót bes Quashed; and also granted leave' to the plaintiff to file an amended transcript. When the rule caihe on to be argued, the amended transcript was still defective; and the plaintiff asked for a sec’ond rule to amend, which the court refused, and quashed the appeal*
This was assigned as error.
Babbit for plaintiff in error.
Btruthers, contra.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The court '.Vas bound to receive nothing under the rifle to amend, but an amended transcript properly certified; and the plaintiff, having neglected to perfect his transcript when an op-" portunity was afforded, co'iild claim no further'indulgence.
Judgment- affirmed;-