Case Name: Ivan DOMINGUEZ-RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2018-08-07
Citations: 553 S.W.3d 444
Docket Number: No. ED 105716
Parties: Ivan DOMINGUEZ-RODRIGUEZ, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 553
Pages: 444–445

Head Matter:
Ivan DOMINGUEZ-RODRIGUEZ, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 105716
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
FILED: August 7, 2018
FOR APPELLANT: Kevin B. Gau, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101.
For Respondent: JOSHUA D. HAWLEY, Karen L. Kramer, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.
Before Roy L. Richter, P. J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Ivan Dominguez-Rodriguez ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's judgment, after an evidentiary hearing, denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant was convicted, following a jury trial, of first-degree assault, in violation of Section 565.050 (RSMo. 2000 ), first-degree burglary, in violation of Section 569.160, and armed criminal action, in violation of Section 571.014. Movant was sentenced to 38 years' imprisonment. This court affirmed Movant's convictions and sentences on direct appeal in State v. Dominguez-Rodriguez, 471 S.W.3d 337 (Mo. App. E.D. 2015).
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).