Case Name: In the Matter of Martin Blum et al., Appellants, v. Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1976-07-06
Citations: 39 N.Y.2d 984
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Martin Blum et al., Appellants, v Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 39
Pages: 984–986

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Martin Blum et al., Appellants, v Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York, Respondent.
Argued June 9, 1976;
decided July 6, 1976
Jerome Tauber and I. Philip Sipser for appellants.
W. Bernard Richland, Corporation Counsel (Diane R. Eisner, L. Kevin Sheridan and Joseph F. Bruno of counsel), for respondent.
Robert D. Stone and Lawrence W. Reich for Ewald B. Nyquist, Commissioner of Education of the State of New York, amicus curiae.
Danny Ezra Greenblatt, amicus curiae.

Opinion:
Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, on so much of the memorandum thereat-as states that the Board of Education acted properly in terminating the employment of these petitioners. With respect to the concluding two sentences of that memorandum it should be noted that, in a decision rendered simultaneously with this, we have reversed the Appellate Division's order in Steele v Board of Educ. (52 AD2d 598). (See 40 NY2d 456.)