Case Name: Shaw v. The State
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1918-04-02
Citations: 22 Ga. App. 134
Docket Number: 9530
Parties: Shaw v. The State.
Judges: Broyles, P. J., and Barwell, J., eoneur.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 22
Pages: 134–134

Head Matter:
9530.
Shaw v. The State.
Decided April 2, 1918.
Accusation of misdeameanor; 'from city court of Savannah—-. Judge Rourke. December 22, 1917.
Robert L. Golding, for plaintiff in error.
Walter C. Harbridge, solicitor-general, contra.

Opinion:
Bloodworth, J.
1. The entire brief of the attorney for the plaintiff in error- is in the following sentence: "The recitals of fact and statement of error in the motion and amended motion for a new trial clearly state the issues in the case and same is respectfully submitted to the court." This is not an argument. It has been repeatedly held by this court and the Supreme Court of the State that assignments of error not argued in the brief of counsel for plaintiff in error will be treated as abandoned.
2. The evidence demanded the verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
Broyles, P. J., and Barwell, J., eoneur.