Case Name: WHITE v. CITY OF PAWHUSKA et al.
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1925-09-15
Citations: 113 Okla. 270
Docket Number: No. 16338
Parties: WHITE v. CITY OF PAWHUSKA et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 113
Pages: 270–271

Head Matter:
WHITE v. CITY OF PAWHUSKA et al.
No. 16338
Opinion Filed Sept. 15, 1925.
H. P. White, for plaintiff in error.
AVilson, Murphey & Duncan, for defendants in error.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This action was brought to enjoin the city of Pawhuska from letting a certain paving contract, and a temporary restraining order was granted. On a hearing for a temporary injunction, the restraining cyder was dissolved, and a temporary injunction denied, and plaintiff in error appealed. A supersedeas bond was denied, and plaintiff in error made application. to this court for bond; it was also denied. After both the trial court and the Supreme Court had refused to supersede the judgment, defendant in erroy let the contract for the paving.
Since the enjoining of the letting of the contract was the only relief sought, and the contract having now been let, this appeal becomes moot, and is dismissed.