Case Name: James COURTNEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-01-25
Citations: 10 S.W.3d 594
Docket Number: No. ED 76350
Parties: James COURTNEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before MARY RHODES RUSSELL, C.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 10
Pages: 594–594

Head Matter:
James COURTNEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 76350.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Jan. 25, 2000.
Lisa M. Stroup, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Linda Lemke, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before MARY RHODES RUSSELL, C.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
James Courtney (Movant) appeals the trial court's judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without a hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).