Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Lucretia Brooke PYSE, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-04-24
Citations: 366 S.W.3d 633
Docket Number: No. ED 97145
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Lucretia Brooke PYSE, Appellant.
Judges: Before: CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J„ and GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 366
Pages: 633–633

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Lucretia Brooke PYSE, Appellant.
No. ED 97145.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
April 24, 2012.
Rehearing Denied May 29, 2012.
Wayne T. Schoeneberg, St. Peters, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Jennifer A. Wideman, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before: CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J„ and GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Lucretia Brooke Pyse appeals from the sentence and judgment of attempt to manufacture methamphetamine, asserting the trial court erred in denying her motions for Judgment of Acquittal and Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict because there was insufficient evidence to prove Pyse knowingly possessed lithium batteries, Ev-erclear alcohol, or a coffee grinder with the intent to manufacture methamphetamine. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Mo. R.Crim. P. 30.25(b) (2011).