Case Name: STATE ex BENNETT v. INDUST COMM
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1935-01-07
Citations: 19 Ohio Law Abs. 1
Docket Number: No 4769
Parties: STATE ex BENNETT v INDUST COMM
Judges: ROSS, J, concurs.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 19
Pages: 1–1

Head Matter:
STATE ex BENNETT v INDUST COMM
Ohio Appeals, 1st Dist, Hamilton Co
No 4769.
Decided Jan 7, 1935
Shook, Davies, Hoover & Beall, Cincinnati, for plaintiff.
John W. Bricker, Attorney General, Columbus, R. R. Zurmehly, Columbus, and Raymond J. Kunkel, Cincinnati, for defendant.

Opinion:
OPINION
By HAMILTON, PJ.
The motion to quash the service of summons will be overruled. It is established that an objection to the jurisdiction of the court of the subject matter or a motion to dismiss a suit or proceeding upon ahy other grounds than the court's jurisdiction over the person, operates as a general entry of appearance. Handy v Insurance Co., 37 Oh St, 366. Smith v Hoover, 39 Oh St, 249, at 257. Elliott v Lawhead, 43 Oh St, 171. Klein v Lust, 110 Oh St, 197.
The Commission, therefore, having by the motion entered its appearance in the case, the motion will be overruled. Judgment accordingly.
ROSS, J, concurs.