Case Name: Kevin McLAUGHLIN, Rebecca McLaughlin, Phillip Dutt, McLaughlin Dutt, LLC., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The KRYSTAL COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-04-30
Citations: 378 F. App'x 873
Docket Number: No. 09-14709
Parties: Kevin McLAUGHLIN, Rebecca McLaughlin, Phillip Dutt, McLaughlin Dutt, LLC., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The KRYSTAL COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before BIRCH, MARTIN and HILL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 378
Pages: 873–874

Head Matter:
Kevin McLAUGHLIN, Rebecca McLaughlin, Phillip Dutt, McLaughlin Dutt, LLC., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The KRYSTAL COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 09-14709
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
April 30, 2010.
Wyman O. Gilmore, Jr., Grove Hill, AL, for Appellant.
Karl Montague Terrell, Shea, Stokes Robert & Wagner, ALC, Atlanta, GA, for Appellee.
Before BIRCH, MARTIN and HILL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
This appeal is based upon the district court's grant of a motion for summary judgment filed by The Krystal Company (Krystal), against Krystal licensees/franchisees, Kevin McLaughlin, Rebecca McLaughlin, Phillip Dutt and McLaughlin-Dutt, LLC (appellants). The claims alleged by appellants arose when Krystal declined to renew their license/franchise agreement.
The pertinent facts are amply set forth in the Memorandum Opinion and Order of the district court dated August 14, 2009. We have thoroughly reviewed the record in this case, the briefs and the argument of counsel. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment of the district court granting summary judgment in favor of Krystal.
AFFIRMED.