Case Name: Leighler C. MAULTSBY, Appellant, v. Sue M. MAULTSBY, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1959-01-30
Citations: 109 So. 2d 202
Docket Number: No. 799
Parties: Leighler C. MAULTSBY, Appellant, v. Sue M. MAULTSBY, Appellee.
Judges: KANNER, C. J., and ALLEN and SHANNON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 109
Pages: 202–202

Head Matter:
Leighler C. MAULTSBY, Appellant, v. Sue M. MAULTSBY, Appellee.
No. 799.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.
Jan. 30, 1959.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 20, 1959.
Sam E. Murrell & Sons, Orlando, for appellant.
Roth & Roth, Orlando, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant primarily questions the alimony award. It is not made to appear that there has been an abuse of judicial discretion. If it should develop that the alimony award imposes a hardship upon the appellant, then he has his remedy, under appropriate circumstances, for reduction as provided under section 65.15, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. See also Lewis v. Lewis, Fla.App.1958, 104 So.2d 597. No error has been made to appear. The cause is accordingly affirmed.
Affirmed.
KANNER, C. J., and ALLEN and SHANNON, JJ., concur.