Case Name: Jeanette PECKER, Appellant, v. Samuel PECKER, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1970-11-03
Citations: 240 So. 2d 528
Docket Number: No. 70-346
Parties: Jeanette PECKER, Appellant, v. Samuel PECKER, Appellee.
Judges: Before CHARLES CARROLL, BARK-DULL and HENDRY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 240
Pages: 528–528

Head Matter:
Jeanette PECKER, Appellant, v. Samuel PECKER, Appellee.
No. 70-346.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 3, 1970.
Herman Grayson ánd John E. Porte, Miami Beach, for appellant.
Betty Kessler, Miami, for appellee.'
Before CHARLES CARROLL, BARK-DULL and HENDRY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant seeks reversal of a final judgment granting the appellee a divorce and denying her claim for alimony.
The sole question presented is whether the court er.red in taking jurisdiction of the parties-and subject matter. It is appellant's contention that the appellee did not prove that he had become a bona fide resident of the state of Florida for six months last past prior to filing his complaint for divorce.
It is a well established rule of law that the trial judge's findings of fact and conclusions of law come to the appellate court with a presumption of correctness and will not be disturbed unless they are clearly erroneous. No reversible error having been made to appear the judgment appealed must be affirmed.
Affirmed.