Case Name: In the Interest of J.E.D., R.J.D., et al., Respondent. JUVENILE OFFICER, Respondent, v. O.D.-Natural Father, Appellant, R.D.-Natural Mother, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1996-03-05
Citations: 916 S.W.2d 886
Docket Number: No. WD 50725
Parties: In the Interest of J.E.D., R.J.D., et al., Respondent. JUVENILE OFFICER, Respondent, v. O.D.—Natural Father, Appellant, R.D.—Natural Mother, Respondent.
Judges: Before ELLIS, P.J., and ULRICH and LAURA DENVIR STITH, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 916
Pages: 886–887

Head Matter:
In the Interest of J.E.D., R.J.D., et al., Respondent. JUVENILE OFFICER, Respondent, v. O.D.—Natural Father, Appellant, R.D.—Natural Mother, Respondent.
No. WD 50725.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
March 5, 1996.
Chris Nelson, Hallsville, for appellant.
Leslie Ann Schneider, Guardian Ad Litem.
Elizabeth K. Magee, Columbia, for Juvenile Officer.
Thomas M. Harrison, Columbia, for R.D., Natural Mother.
Before ELLIS, P.J., and ULRICH and LAURA DENVIR STITH, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Natural father, O.L.D., appeals the termination of his parental rights to his five minor children pursuant to § 211.447 RSMo 1994. He asserts the juvenile officer failed to produce clear, cogent and convincing evidence to support abandonment.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).