Case Name: Butternut Enterprises, Inc., Respondent, v. Travelers Indemnity Company of Rhode Island et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1979-01-15
Citations: 67 A.D.2d 672
Docket Number: 
Parties: Butternut Enterprises, Inc., Respondent, v Travelers Indemnity Company of Rhode Island et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 67
Pages: 672–673

Head Matter:
Butternut Enterprises, Inc., Respondent, v Travelers Indemnity Company of Rhode Island et al., Appellants.

Opinion:
— In an action to recover under two fire insurance policies, one issued by each of the defendants, the appeals are from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated May 16, 1978, which denied defendant Traveler's motion and defendant New Hampshire's cross motion for summary judgment. Order reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and motion and cross motion for summary judgment granted. In its proof of claim, plaintiff set forth a certain sum as the amount claimed under the defendants' fire insurance policies. Said amount has already been paid. Therefore, since no bona fide factual issue exists, the defendants' respective motion and cross motion for summary judgment should have been granted. We note that the respondent filed no brief. Damiani, J. P., Titone, Gulotta and Shapiro, JJ., concur.