Case Name: KING et al. v. THORPE et al.
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1921-07-05
Citations: 90 Okla. 194
Docket Number: No. 10969
Parties: KING et al. v. THORPE et al.
Judges: PITOHFORD, Y. O. J., and McNEILL, MILDER, and ELTING, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 90
Pages: 194–195

Head Matter:
KING et al. v. THORPE et al.
No. 10969
Opinion Filed July 5, 1921.
Rehearing Denied June 19, 1923.
(Syllabus.)
The syllabus in this case is the same as that in the case of Charles Beindorf, Plaintiff in Error, v. Pearl O. Thorpe et al., Defendants in Error, No. 11935, on the docket of this court (decided June 28, 1921), 90 Okla. 191, 203 Pac. 475.
Error from District Court, Caddo County: Will Linn, Judge.
Action between W. Frank King and Solon W. Smith and Pearl O. Thorpe and others. From the judgment, the former bring error.
Reversed and remanded.
Twyford &. Smith, for plaintiffs in error.
Morrison & Jameson, for defendants in error.

Opinion:
NI OH OX/S ON, J.
In this case the parties have filed a stipulation by which it is agreed that the same judgment shall be rendered in this court as is rendered in the case of Charles Beindorf, Plaintiff in Error, v. Pearl Thorpe et al., Defendants in Error, No. 11-935 (decided June 28, 1921), and as the judgment of the' lower court in that cause has been reversed, and the cause remanded, with directions to the trial court to grant a new trial and have an accounting as to the rental value of the premises, and ascertain the amount due the defendants, crediting the plaintiff with the reasonable rental value of the premises during the time same were occupied by Dayton and his heirs, and render jugdment decreeing the deed to be a mortgage and permit the plaintiff to pay the amount of the indebtedness found to be due and make redemption of the property, the judgment decreeing the deed to be a mort-remanded with like directions.
PITOHFORD, Y. O. J., and McNEILL, MILDER, and ELTING, JJ., concur.