Case Name: Scioto Valley Railway & Power Co. et al. v. Public Utilities Commission of Ohio; Valley Public Service Co. v. Public Utilities Commission of Ohio; Cannonball Transportation Co. v. Public Utilities Commission of Ohio; Interstate Motor Transit Co. v. Public Utilities Commission of Ohio
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1929-11-13
Citations: 121 Ohio St. 617
Docket Number: Nos. 21751, 21849, 21879 and 21880
Parties: Scioto Valley Railway & Power Co. et al. v. Public Utilities Commission of Ohio. Valley Public Service Co. v. Public Utilities Commission of Ohio. Cannonball Transportation Co. v. Public Utilities Commission of Ohio. Interstate Motor Transit Co. v. Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.
Judges: Marshall, C. J., Kinkade, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, New Service
Volume: 121
Pages: 617–618

Head Matter:
Scioto Valley Railway & Power Co. et al. v. Public Utilities Commission of Ohio. Valley Public Service Co. v. Public Utilities Commission of Ohio. Cannonball Transportation Co. v. Public Utilities Commission of Ohio. Interstate Motor Transit Co. v. Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.
(Nos. 21751, 21849, 21879 and 21880
Decided November 13, 1929.)
Messrs. Sharp, Schooler, Toland & Marshall and Mr. D. Curtis Reed, for The Scioto Valley Railway & Power Company and The Valley Public Service Company.
Mr. A. B. Johnson and Mr. D. H. Armstrong, for The Cannonball Transportation Company and Tbe Interstate Motor Transit Company.
Mr. Gilbert Bettman, attorney general, and Mr. T. J. Herbert, for tbe Public Utilities Commission.

Opinion:
It is ordered and adjudged by tbis Court, that tbe orders of tbe said Public Utilities Commission be, and tbe same are hereby, affirmed for tbe reason that tbe evidence supports tbe conclusion of tbe Public Utilities Commission.
Orders affirmed.
Marshall, C. J., Kinkade, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ., concur.