Case Name: Stanley B. THOMAN and Norman Jackson, individually and as partners d/b/a Thoman-Jackson Construction a/k/a Jackson-Thoman Construction, Appellants, v. Timmothy ASHLEY, a/k/a Timmothy Sindell, a minor, by his mother and next friend, Ethel Ashley Sindell, et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1966-04-15
Citations: 185 So. 2d 201
Docket Number: No. 381
Parties: Stanley B. THOMAN and Norman Jackson, individually and as partners d/b/a Thoman-Jackson Construction a/k/a Jackson-Thoman Construction, Appellants, v. Timmothy ASHLEY, a/k/a Timmothy Sindell, a minor, by his mother and next friend, Ethel Ashley Sindell, et al., Appellees.
Judges: SMITH, C. J., and ANDREWS and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 185
Pages: 201–202

Head Matter:
Stanley B. THOMAN and Norman Jackson, individually and as partners d/b/a Thoman-Jackson Construction a/k/a Jackson-Thoman Construction, Appellants, v. Timmothy ASHLEY, a/k/a Timmothy Sindell, a minor, by his mother and next friend, Ethel Ashley Sindell, et al., Appellees.
No. 381.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.
April 15, 1966.
Norman C. Roettger, Jr., of Fleming, O’Bryan & Fleming, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.
Larry S. Stewart, of Frates, Fay & Floyd, Miami, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Cook v. Lichtblau, Fla. App.1965, 176 So.2d 523 and Continental Aviation Corp. v. Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company, Fla.1966, 183 So.2d 200.
SMITH, C. J., and ANDREWS and WALDEN, JJ., concur.