Case Name: Frank H. MAHR, Petitioner, v. GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF FLORIDA, Inc., Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1964-04-22
Citations: 163 So. 2d 285
Docket Number: No. 32812
Parties: Frank H. MAHR, Petitioner, v. GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF FLORIDA, Inc., Respondent.
Judges: THOMAS, THORNAL, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 163
Pages: 285–289

Head Matter:
Frank H. MAHR, Petitioner, v. GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF FLORIDA, Inc., Respondent.
No. 32812.
Supreme Court of Florida.
April 22, 1964.
Dewey A. Dye, Jr., of Dye & Dye, Bradenton, for petitioner.
Macfarlane, Ferguson, Allison & Kelly and Charles F. Clark, Tampa, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
THOMAS, THORNAL, O'CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.
DREW, C. J., and ROBERTS and ERVIN, JJ., dissent.