Case Name: AMERICAN MULTI-CINEMA, INC., Appellant, v. Jake ZIMMERMAN, Assessor, St. Louis County, Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2015-09-22
Citations: 470 S.W.3d 793
Docket Number: No. ED 102407
Parties: AMERICAN MULTI-CINEMA, INC., Appellant, v. Jake ZIMMERMAN, Assessor, St. Louis County, Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Roy L. Richter, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 470
Pages: 793–794

Head Matter:
AMERICAN MULTI-CINEMA, INC., Appellant, v. Jake ZIMMERMAN, Assessor, St. Louis County, Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 102407
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
FILED: September 22, 2015
Robert J. Droney, Thomas J. Campbell, Co-Counsel, 100 South Fourth Street, Suite 1000, St. Louis, MO 63102, POLSI-NELLI, P.C., for appellant.
Paula Jane Lemerman, Priscilla F. Gunn, Co-Counsel, St. Louis County Counselor, 41 South Central Ave., 9th Floor, Clayton, MO 63105, for respondent.
Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Roy L. Richter, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
American Multi-Cinema, Inc., (AMC) appeals from the decision and order of the State Tax Commission of Missouri (the Commission) setting aside decisions of the St. Louis County Board of Equalization sustaining the assessments made by Jake Zimmerman, Assessor, St. Louis County, Missouri, related to tangible personal property owned by AMC. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. The decision and order of the Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).