Case Name: BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. and David Goldfarb, M.D., Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants-Appellants, and C.R. Bard, Inc., Counterclaim Defendant, v. W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC., Defendant-Counterclaimant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-09-11
Citations: 346 F. App'x 592
Docket Number: No. 2009-1359
Parties: BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. and David Goldfarb, M.D., Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants-Appellants, and C.R. Bard, Inc., Counterclaim Defendant, v. W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC., Defendant-Counterclaimant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 346
Pages: 592–593

Head Matter:
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. and David Goldfarb, M.D., Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants-Appellants, and C.R. Bard, Inc., Counterclaim Defendant, v. W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC., Defendant-Counterclaimant-Appellee.
No. 2009-1359.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Sept. 11, 2009.
Andrew M. Federhar, Fennemore Craig, P.C., Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants-Appellants and Counterclaim Defendant.
David H. Pfeffer, Locke, Lord Bissell & Liddell, LLP, New York, NY, for Defendant-Counterclaimant-Appellee.

Opinion:
ON MOTION
ORDER
Upon consideration of the appellants' motion to voluntarily dismiss their appeal,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
The motion is granted. Each side shall bear its own costs.
It is not the court's usual practice to designate a voluntary dismissal as being with or without prejudice.