Case Name: William LANE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2016-04-05
Citations: 485 S.W.3d 402
Docket Number: WD 78682
Parties: William LANE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Division Three: James Edward Welsh, P.J., Thomas H. Newton, and Gary D. Witt, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 485
Pages: 402–402

Head Matter:
William LANE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
WD 78682
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
ORDER FILED: April 5, 2016
Rosalynn Koch, Columbia, MO, Counsel for Appellant.
Richard Starnes, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent.
Before Division Three: James Edward Welsh, P.J., Thomas H. Newton, and Gary D. Witt, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
Per Curiam:
Mr. William Lane appeals the denial of a Rule 29.15 motion pleading ineffective assistance of counsel because trial counsel failed to object to the victim's out-of-court videotaped statements and failed to require the victim to testify which waived Mr. Lane's right to confrontation. We disagree.
For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).