Case Name: Mark and Elizabeth WISNISKI t/d/b/a Saturn Surplus v. BROWN & BROWN INS. CO. OF PA, Donald Blood and Will Rineer, EMC Ins. Co. and Scott W. Ahlstrom Appeal of Brown & Brown Ins. Co. of PA, Donald Blood and Will Rineer
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2005-12-21
Citations: 887 A.2d 1238
Docket Number: 
Parties: Mark and Elizabeth WISNISKI t/d/b/a Saturn Surplus v. BROWN & BROWN INS. CO. OF PA, Donald Blood and Will Rineer, EMC Ins. Co. and Scott W. Ahlstrom Appeal of Brown & Brown Ins. Co. of PA, Donald Blood and Will Rineer.
Judges: Justice NIGRO did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 887
Pages: 1238–1238

Head Matter:
Mark and Elizabeth WISNISKI t/d/b/a Saturn Surplus v. BROWN & BROWN INS. CO. OF PA, Donald Blood and Will Rineer, EMC Ins. Co. and Scott W. Ahlstrom Appeal of Brown & Brown Ins. Co. of PA, Donald Blood and Will Rineer.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued Dec. 5, 2005.
Decided Dec. 21, 2005.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The decision of the Superior Court is hereby VACATED. The matter is remanded to the Superior Court for reconsideration of whether a duty exists by applying the fíve-prong test as set forth in Althaus v. Cohen, 562 Pa. 547, 756 A.2d 1166 (2000), and for an opinion in support thereof.
Jurisdiction relinquished.
Justice NIGRO did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.