Case Name: RAYMOND HEETNER, PROSECUTOR, v. CITY OF NEWARK, DEFENDANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1933-10-17
Citations: 11 N.J. Misc. 853
Docket Number: 
Parties: RAYMOND HEETNER, PROSECUTOR, v. CITY OF NEWARK, DEFENDANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 11
Pages: 853–853

Head Matter:
RAYMOND HEETNER, PROSECUTOR, v. CITY OF NEWARK, DEFENDANT.
Submitted January term, 1933
Decided October 17, 1933.
Before Justices Parker, Lloyd and Heher.
Por the prosecutor, Samuel E. Kresch.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We are clear that a writ should be allowed. It may be presented accordingly.
Counsel have apparently stipulated that in case of allowance the court shall proceed and decide the case as on final hearing on briefs to be furnished by the respective parties. However, we cannot accede to this method of disposition, particularly as no brief has been submitted for the city, and we are not apprised that counsel for the city consent that the conviction in question be set aside.
Let a writ issue and return in the usual course.