Case Name: SUGARHOUSE MERCANTILE CO. v. SALT LAKE COUNTY et al.
Court: Utah Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Utah
Decision Date: 1950-12-26
Citations: 119 Utah 234
Docket Number: No. 7487
Parties: SUGARHOUSE MERCANTILE CO. v. SALT LAKE COUNTY et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Utah Reports
Volume: 119
Pages: 234–235

Head Matter:
SUGARHOUSE MERCANTILE CO. v. SALT LAKE COUNTY et al.
No. 7487.
Decided December 26, 1950.
(225 P. 2d 1050)
See 61 C. J. Taxation, Sec. 2018.
Golden W. Robbins, Salt Lake City, for appellant.
Edward M. Morrissey, Co. Atty., Salt Lake County, William S. Livingston, Asst. Co. Atty., Salt Lake County, and Mary J. Condas, all af Salt Lake City, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This case is controlled by our decision in the case of Toronto v. Sheffield, 118 Utah 460, 222 P. 2d 594, in which Section 104—2—5.10, Laws of Utah 1943, was held to be unconstitutional.
The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded with instructions to grant a new trial wherein defendants may present their claims for the amounts they have paid to the county for this property as a condition of quieting appellant's title thereto. Appellant shall recover its costs on appeal.