Case Name: Edwin F. Borgos et al., Respondents, v. Edward G. Duerstein et al., Appellants
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1954-12-03
Citations: 307 N.Y. 932
Docket Number: 
Parties: Edwin F. Borgos et al., Respondents, v. Edward G. Duerstein et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 307
Pages: 932–933

Head Matter:
Edwin F. Borgos et al., Respondents, v. Edward G. Duerstein et al., Appellants.
Submitted November 29, 2954;
decided December 3, 1954.
Harry G. Herman, County Attorney, for motion.
Julius Garrell and Harry Menoin opposed.

Opinion:
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed, with $10 costs and necessary printing disbursements, upon the ground that the movant is neither a " party aggrieved " (Civ. Prac. Act, § 557, subd. 1) nor a " person aggrieved who is not a party but is entitled to be substituted in place of a party " within the meaning of section 557 (subd. 2) of the Civil Practice Act. Motion for an order of substitution dismissed.