Case Name: Ceral L. ROBINSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2017-02-21
Citations: 510 S.W.3d 896
Docket Number: No. ED 104298
Parties: Ceral L. ROBINSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Colleen Dolan, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 510
Pages: 896–897

Head Matter:
Ceral L. ROBINSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 104298
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Filed: February 21, 2017
Lisa M. Stroup, St. Louis, MO, For Movant/Appellant
Karen L. Kramer, Jefferson City, MO, For Respondent/Respondent
Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Colleen Dolan, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Ceral L. Robinson appeals from the motion court's denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.15. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An ex tended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. 2013, unless otherwise indicated.