Case Name: Edward LILLIS, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1977-06-30
Citations: 347 So. 2d 1023
Docket Number: No. 50186
Parties: Edward LILLIS, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: OVERTON; C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, ENGLAND, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and KARL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 347
Pages: 1023–1023

Head Matter:
Edward LILLIS, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 50186.
Supreme Court of Florida.
June 30, 1977.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Thomas G. Murray, Asst. Public Defender, for petitioner.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen, and Sidney M. Pertnoy and Anthony C. Musto, Asst. Attys. Gen., for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ. Upon further consideration of the cause, we conclude that no direct conflict of decisions exists as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.
It is so ordered.
OVERTON; C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, ENGLAND, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and KARL, JJ., concur.