Case Name: MEYER D. STERN v. A. R. OLSTED
Court: Minnesota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Minnesota
Decision Date: 1926-03-12
Citations: 166 Minn. 504
Docket Number: No. 25,111
Parties: MEYER D. STERN v. A. R. OLSTED.
Judges: 
Reporter: Minnesota Reports
Volume: 166
Pages: 504–504

Head Matter:
MEYER D. STERN v. A. R. OLSTED.
March 12, 1926.
No. 25,111.
Allen & Fletcher, for appellant.
W. E. Rowe and O’Brien & Sylvestre, for respondent.
Reported in 207 N. W. 740.

Opinion:
WILSON, C. J.
This is an action to recover upon a contract of the character involved in Stern v. Mayer, supra, page 346. A verdict was rendered for defendant and plaintiff appealed from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment non obstante or a new trial. We will not consider the questions presented in the briefs on this appeal, but we recognize that the insufficiency of a complaint, with certain exceptions not here applicable, may be raised at any time. Dun. Dig. § 7681 and 7732.
Upon authority of Stern v. Mayer, supra, the complaint in this action fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action and for that reason the order of the trial court is affirmed.
Affirmed.