Case Name: Roger OSBORN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Cindy OSBORN, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-02-27
Citations: 267 F. App'x 266
Docket Number: No. 07-7623
Parties: Roger OSBORN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Cindy OSBORN, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 267
Pages: 266–266

Head Matter:
Roger OSBORN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Cindy OSBORN, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 07-7623.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 21, 2008.
Decided: Feb. 27, 2008.
Roger Osborn, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Roger Osborn appeals the district court's order dismissing his complaint against Defendant for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(h)(3). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Osborn v. Osborn, No. 8:07-cv-02305-AW (D. Md. filed Sept. 11, 2007; entered Sept. 12, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.