Case Name: Edith Veronica DIAZ, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-11-22
Citations: 113 F. App'x 299
Docket Number: No. 03-72969; Agency No. A75-700-365
Parties: Edith Veronica DIAZ, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before LEAVY, McKEOWN, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 113
Pages: 299–299

Head Matter:
Edith Veronica DIAZ, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 03-72969.
Agency No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 15, 2004.
Decided Nov. 22, 2004.
Edith Veronica Diaz, Costa Mesa, CA, pro se.
Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Brenda M. O’Malley, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before LEAVY, McKEOWN, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Edith Veronica Diaz, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' dismissal of her appeal from an Immigration Judge's termination of removal proceedings. We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction over Diaz's petition because she is not subject to "a final order of removal." See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1). The respondent has not acted, pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 241.8(a), to reinstate Diaz's alleged prior order of removal.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.