Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ismael PEREZ-ZARCO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-03-19
Citations: 225 F. App'x 589
Docket Number: No. 06-10513
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ismael PEREZ-ZARCO, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 225
Pages: 589–590

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ismael PEREZ-ZARCO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-10513.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 12, 2007 .
Filed March 19, 2007.
Ronald C. Rachow, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Reno, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Donald C. Gish, Esq., Sparks, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: KOZINSKI, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Ismael Perez-Zarco appeals from the 70-month sentence imposed after his guilty-plea conviction for unlawful re-entry by a deported alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Perez-Zarco contends that the district court erred in sentencing him because it failed to consider the discrepancies in sentencing between the fast-track and non-fast-track districts. Perez-Zarco's contentions are foreclosed. See United States v. Marcial-Santiago, 447 F.3d 715, 718-19 (9th Cir.2006).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.