Case Name: The People ex rel. Francis P. McGlory, App'lt, v. J. Hampden Robb et al., Resp'ts
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1889-05-24
Citations: 23 N.Y. St. Rep. 591
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People ex rel. Francis P. McGlory, App’lt, v. J. Hampden Robb et al., Resp’ts.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 23
Pages: 591–592

Head Matter:
The People ex rel. Francis P. McGlory, App’lt, v. J. Hampden Robb et al., Resp’ts.
(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department,
Filed May 24, 1889.)
Municipal corporation—Police—Evidence on removal oe.
The evidence in a proceeding before the commissioners of public parks of the city of New York, for the removal of a member of the park police, may be taken by one commissioner, although a removal must be made by the board.
Certiorari to review removal of relator from the park police.
John F. McIntyre, for relator; W. L. Turner, for resp’ts.

Opinion:
Van Brunt, P. J.
It is clear that this court cannot interfere with the action of the respondents. There were sharp conflicts of testimony between the doctor, who examined the relator upon the evening when he is charged with being intoxicated, and the relator. The relator claims that he was not intoxicated, but was suffering from an attack of rheumatism, and that his foot and ankle were swollen. The doctor testified that he examined the foot and ankle and that there was no evidence of swelling, and a firm pressure did not cause the relator to wince, and that he was evidently under the influence of liquor.
It is true that the evidence of the relator was corroborated by that of his wife, but that fact affords no reason for disturbing the conclusion of the commissioners. If the evidence of the doctor was to be believed, then the evidence of the relator and his wife was untrue. Of the credibility of the witnesses the board were the judges, and they probably reached a correct conclusion.
As to the regularity of the proceedings, no valid objection has been stated. In similar proceedings it has been held that the evidence may be taken by one commissioner,, although a removal must be made by the board.
The writ must be dismissed, but without costs.
Daniels and Brady, JJ., concur.