Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jaime Lamon ESQUIVEL, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-05-06
Citations: 564 F. App'x 266
Docket Number: No. 13-3426
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jaime Lamon ESQUIVEL, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before BYE, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 564
Pages: 266–266

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jaime Lamon ESQUIVEL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-3426.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: April 21, 2014.
Filed: May 6, 2014.
Bruce Gillan, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Lincoln, NE, Lyn-nett Wagner, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Omaha, NE, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Jaime Lamon Esquivel, Waymart, PA, pro se.
Before BYE, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Federal inmate Jaime Esquivel appeals the district court's denial of his motion for review of his sentence. After careful review, we conclude that the motion amounted to an unauthorized successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h) (authorization requirements); United States v. Lambros, 404 F.3d 1034, 1036 (8th Cir.2005) (per curiam) (inmates cannot bypass authorization requirement of § 2255 by purporting to invoke some other procedure). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.