Case Name: Latrail R. YOUNG, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2014-03-11
Citations: 424 S.W.3d 465
Docket Number: No. ED 99864
Parties: Latrail R. YOUNG, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., KURT S. ODENWALD, J., and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 424
Pages: 465–466

Head Matter:
Latrail R. YOUNG, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 99864.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
March 11, 2014.
Roxanna Allen Mason, Missouri Public Defender Office, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Todd Tyler Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., KURT S. ODENWALD, J., and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Latrail R. Young appeals from the motion court's "Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Order and Judgment" denying his Rule 29.15 "Amended Motion to Vacate Judgments and Sentences and Request for an Evidentiary Hearing," alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).