Case Name: Cattaraugus Central School Board of Education, Appellant, v. Carol Case Siracuse, AIA, Defendant, and Kirst Construction, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Tom Greenauer Development, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2003-06-10
Citations: 100 N.Y.2d 552
Docket Number: 
Parties: Cattaraugus Central School Board of Education, Appellant, v Carol Case Siracuse, AIA, Defendant, and Kirst Construction, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Tom Greenauer Development, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 100
Pages: 552–552

Head Matter:
Cattaraugus Central School Board of Education, Appellant, v Carol Case Siracuse, AIA, Defendant, and Kirst Construction, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Tom Greenauer Development, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
Submitted March 10, 2003;
decided June 10, 2003

Opinion:
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as dismissed the third-party complaint, dismissed upon the ground that appellant is not here a party aggrieved {see CPLR 5511); motion for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the remainder of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.