Case Name: Douglas B. MEEKS, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. David R. LEWIS, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2009-05-05
Citations: 282 S.W.3d 413
Docket Number: No. ED 91929
Parties: Douglas B. MEEKS, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. David R. LEWIS, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 282
Pages: 413–414

Head Matter:
Douglas B. MEEKS, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. David R. LEWIS, Defendant/Respondent.
No. ED 91929.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
May 5, 2009.
M. Dwight Robbins, Fredericktown, MO, for Plaintiff/Appellant.
Lora Cooper, Nathan Bollinger, Freder-icktown, MO, for Defendant/Respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Douglas B. Meeks appeals from the trial court's judgment denying his petition requesting a concealed carry endorsement. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the trial court was supported by substantial evidence, was not against the weight of the evidence, and did not erroneously declare or apply the law.
Murphy v. Carrón, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).