Case Name: In the Matter of Kingdon Gould, Jr., et al., Respondents, v. Robert A. Kerwick, as Assessor of the Town of Hardenburgh, et al., Appellants
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1982-11-11
Citations: 57 N.Y.2d 1012
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Kingdon Gould, Jr., et al., Respondents, v Robert A. Kerwick, as Assessor of the Town of Hardenburgh, et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 57
Pages: 1012–1016

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Kingdon Gould, Jr., et al., Respondents, v Robert A. Kerwick, as Assessor of the Town of Hardenburgh, et al., Appellants.
Decided November 11, 1982
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Stephen L. Oppenheim for appellants.
G. Gordon Coughlin, Jr., for respondents.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order reversed, with costs, and the judgment and order of Supreme Court, Ulster County, reinstated for reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum of Justice Howard A. Levine at the Appellate Division (87 AD2d 917, 919-920). Question certified answered in the affirmative.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.