Case Name: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Terry CECIL, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1988-01-21
Citations: 518 So. 2d 919
Docket Number: No. 70468
Parties: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Terry CECIL, Respondent.
Judges: EHRLICH, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 518
Pages: 919–919

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Terry CECIL, Respondent.
No. 70468.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Jan. 21, 1988.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Michael J. Neimand, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, for petitioner.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, and N. Joseph Durant, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, Miami, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have for review State v. Cecil, 508 So.2d 1249, 1250 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), which certified the following question:
Whether the state is precluded from seeking common law certiorari review of non-appealable interlocutory orders in criminal cases.
We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We have resolved this question in State v. Pettis, 520 So.2d 250 (Fla.1988), which held that the state is not precluded from seeking review of interlocutory orders by common law certiorari. Thus, we quash the decision below and remand for proceedings consistent with that opinion.
It is so ordered.
EHRLICH, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.
MCDONALD, C.J., and OVERTON, J., dissent.