Case Name: Otis Elevator Company, Respondent, v. Solomon Miller, Respondent, and Jacob Reisberg, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1926-06-08
Citations: 127 Misc. 421
Docket Number: 
Parties: Otis Elevator Company, Respondent, v. Solomon Miller, Respondent, and Jacob Reisberg, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 127
Pages: 421–422

Head Matter:
Otis Elevator Company, Respondent, v. Solomon Miller, Respondent, and Jacob Reisberg, Appellant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
June 8, 1926.
Michael Seinfeld [.Benjamin Kirschstein of counsel], for the appellant.
Phillips & Avery [Talbot M. Malcolm of counsel], for the respondent.
Benjamin Bardondess [Gustav W. M. Wieboldt of counsel], for the respondent Miller.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment in favor of' the plaintiff against the impleaded defendant Reisberg was improper, as any judgment under subdivision 2, section 193 of the Civil Practice Act against such defendant should run in favor only of the defendant originally joined. (Bozzuffi v. Darrieusecq, 125 Misc. 178.) The judgment is, therefore, modified so as to read in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant Miller and in favor of the defendant Miller against the impleaded defendant Reisberg, and thus affirmed, with twenty-five dollars costs to the defendant Reisberg against the plaintiff.
All concur; present, Delehanty, Lydon and Levy, JJ.