Case Name: James RUTH, Petitioner, v. STATMASTER CORPORATION et al., Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1968-09-25
Citations: 214 So. 2d 343
Docket Number: No. 37664
Parties: James RUTH, Petitioner, v. STATMASTER CORPORATION et al., Respondents.
Judges: CALDWELL, C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, ERVIN and HOPPING, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 214
Pages: 343–344

Head Matter:
James RUTH, Petitioner, v. STATMASTER CORPORATION et al., Respondents.
No. 37664.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Sept. 25, 1968.
Law Office of David Goldman, Miami, for petitioner.
Kates & Ress, Roland Gomez, North Miami, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date June 3, 1968.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dis pensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
The motion of petitioner for attorneys' fees in this Court is denied.
It is so ordered.
CALDWELL, C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, ERVIN and HOPPING, JJ., concur.