Case Name: THE CITY OF NEWARK, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, PETITIONER, v. HONORABLE CHARLES W. PARKER, A JUSTICE OF THE NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT, WARREN DIXON, Jr., WILLIAM K. FLANAGAN, HAROLD A. PRICE AND ANDREW J. STEELMAN, RESPONDENTS
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1937-12-16
Citations: 119 N.J.L. 226
Docket Number: 
Parties: THE CITY OF NEWARK, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, PETITIONER, v. HONORABLE CHARLES W. PARKER, A JUSTICE OF THE NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT, WARREN DIXON, Jr., WILLIAM K. FLANAGAN, HAROLD A. PRICE AND ANDREW J. STEELMAN, RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 119
Pages: 226–227

Head Matter:
THE CITY OF NEWARK, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, PETITIONER, v. HONORABLE CHARLES W. PARKER, A JUSTICE OF THE NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT, WARREN DIXON, Jr., WILLIAM K. FLANAGAN, HAROLD A. PRICE AND ANDREW J. STEELMAN, RESPONDENTS.
Argued November 23, 1937
Decided December 16, 1937.
Before Justices Bodine, Heher and Perskie.
For the petitioner, James F. X. O’Brien.
For the respondents, Warren Dixon, Jr., William F. Flanagan, Harold A. Price and Andrew J. Steelman, pro se.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We have considered with care the arguments made before us and the briefs submitted, aud we can only conclude that no debatable questions exist which have not been disposed of in the eases relied upon by Mr. Justice Parker in the memorandum filed by him and printed herewith.
The writ will be denied.