Case Name: Larry Munoz, Respondent, et al., Plaintiff, v. DJZ Realty, LLC, Appellant. (And a Third-Party Action.)
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2005-06-29
Citations: 5 N.Y.3d 747
Docket Number: 
Parties: Larry Munoz, Respondent, et al., Plaintiff, v DJZ Realty, LLC, Appellant. (And a Third-Party Action.)
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 5
Pages: 747–748

Head Matter:
[834 NE2d 776, 800 NYS2d 866]
Larry Munoz, Respondent, et al., Plaintiff, v DJZ Realty, LLC, Appellant. (And a Third-Party Action.)
Decided June 29, 2005
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Law Offices of Craig E Curdo, Middletown (Gordon T Sakow of counsel), for appellant.
Brecher Fishman Pasternack Popish Heller Reiff & Walsh, PC., New York City (Frank Gulino of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action granted. The certified question should be answered in the negative.
Plaintiff was injured in a fall while applying a new advertisement to the face of a billboard that sat atop a building owned by defendant. Plaintiffs activities may have changed the outward appearance of the billboard, but did not change the billboard's structure, and thus were more akin to cosmetic maintenance or decorative modification than to "altering" for purposes of Labor Law § 240 (1) (see Joblon v Solow, 91 NY2d 457, 465 [1998]).
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and R.S. Smith concur in memorandum.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order reversed, etc.