Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cuong Quoc HUYNH, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-01-13
Citations: 120 F. App'x 110
Docket Number: No. 04-30151
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cuong Quoc HUYNH, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: BEEZER, HALL and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 120
Pages: 110–110

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cuong Quoc HUYNH, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 04-30151.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 10, 2005.
Decided Jan. 13, 2005.
Ye-Ting Woo, Sarah Y. Vogel, Esq., USSE — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Jeff Ellis, Es., Law Offices of Ellis, Holmes & Witchley, PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: BEEZER, HALL and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Cuong Quoc Huynh appeals the district court's judgment ordering him to participate in mental health counseling as a condition of probation. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Because Huynh did not object to the special condition of supervised release before the district court, we review for plain error. See United States v. Bahe, 201 F.3d 1124, 1127 (9th Cir.2000). The district court did not plainly err in imposing as a condition of probation the requirement that Huynh participate in a mental health counseling. The Presentence Report and Huynh's sentencing memorandum indicated, inter alia, that Huynh had recently experienced a lot of stress, had an anxious mood, possessed paranoid ideations, and his family had a history of mental illness. These circumstances supported imposition of the special condition. See United States v. Lopez, 258 F.3d 1053, 1056-57 (9th Cir.2001); see also U.S.S.G. § 5D1.3(d)(5).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.