Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gerold Lee DAVIS, a/k/a Jerry G. Davies, a/k/a Arnold Lietzey, a/k/a Gerold L. Davis, a/k/a John Reid, a/k/a Jerry Davies, a/k/a Gerald K. Davis, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-05-02
Citations: 33 F. App'x 682
Docket Number: No. 01-8056
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gerold Lee DAVIS, a/k/a Jerry G. Davies, a/k/a Arnold Lietzey, a/k/a Gerold L. Davis, a/k/a John Reid, a/k/a Jerry Davies, a/k/a Gerald K. Davis, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 33
Pages: 682–682

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gerold Lee DAVIS, a/k/a Jerry G. Davies, a/k/a Arnold Lietzey, a/k/a Gerold L. Davis, a/k/a John Reid, a/k/a Jerry Davies, a/k/a Gerald K. Davis, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 01-8056.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 25, 2002.
Decided May 2, 2002.
Gerold Lee Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Marvin Jennings Caughman, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Gerold Lee Davis appeals the district court's order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion seeking reconsideration of the district court's order denying his motion to modify his sentence. We have reviewed the record and the district court opinion and find no reversible error. The district court's order also denies relief on Davis' recusal motion. Davis does not challenge this portion of the district court's order. Therefore, this issue is not preserved for appeal. 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Davis, Nos. CA-97-2007-8-13; CR-93-429 (D.S.C. Oct. 5, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.