Case Name: REMME, Appellant, v. JOHNSON, Respondent
Court: South Dakota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: South Dakota
Decision Date: 1930-10-06
Citations: 57 S.D. 386
Docket Number: File No. 7041
Parties: REMME, Appellant, v. JOHNSON, Respondent.
Judges: All the Judges concur.
Reporter: South Dakota Reports
Volume: 57
Pages: 386–386

Head Matter:
REMME, Appellant, v. JOHNSON, Respondent.
(232 N. W. 92.)
(File No. 7041.
Opinion filed October 6, 1930.)
Charles Lacey, of Sioux Falls, for Appellant.
M. G. Ludcfy, of 'Sioux Falls, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff's complaint sufficiently alleges the execution of a contract in writing and seeks damages for a breach thereof. At the opening of the trial defendant objected to the introduction of any testimony upon the ground that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant. This objection was sustained and an order entered accordingly and a judgment entered1 dismissing the complaint, from which plaintiff has appealed.
The allegations of the complaint are entirely sufficient to state a cause of action in favor of appellant and against respondent, and the judgment appealed from is therefore reversed.
All the Judges concur.