Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Jesus ALVAREZ-FRANCO, Defendant and Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1972-07-17
Citations: 461 F.2d 1261
Docket Number: No. 71-3070
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Jesus ALVAREZ-FRANCO, Defendant and Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 461
Pages: 1261–1262

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Jesus ALVAREZ-FRANCO, Defendant and Appellant.
No. 71-3070.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
July 17, 1972.
Donald L. Ungar (argued), Milton T. Simmons, of Phelan, Simmons & Ungar, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellant.
William B. Shubb, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Sacramento, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before CHAMBERS, MERRILL and WALLACE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
We cannot conclude that the interrogation conducted by the court was improper.
We think there was a sufficient showing of willfulness and knowledge.
We conclude that the form of sentence was not permissible under Dear Wing Jung v. Uni,ted States, 312 F.2d 73 (9th Cir., 1962).
The case is remanded for resentencing.