Case Name: CITY OF BETHANY, Respondent, v. FARMERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARRISON COUNTY, Missouri, Defendant, Harrison County Farm Bureau, Defendant, Eddie Barber d/b/a Ed's Excavating, Defendant, Jeff Schreiner d/b/a Schreiner and Sons Construction, Defendant, Morton Buildings, Inc., Appellant, Allied Design Architectural & Engineering Group, P.C., Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-03-29
Citations: 158 S.W.3d 317
Docket Number: No. WD 63236
Parties: CITY OF BETHANY, Respondent, v. FARMERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARRISON COUNTY, Missouri, Defendant, Harrison County Farm Bureau, Defendant, Eddie Barber d/b/a Ed’s Excavating, Defendant, Jeff Schreiner d/b/a Schreiner and Sons Construction, Defendant, Morton Buildings, Inc., Appellant, Allied Design Architectural & Engineering Group, P.C., Appellant.
Judges: Before HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, Presiding Judge, JAMES M. SMART, JR., Judge and JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 158
Pages: 317–318

Head Matter:
CITY OF BETHANY, Respondent, v. FARMERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARRISON COUNTY, Missouri, Defendant, Harrison County Farm Bureau, Defendant, Eddie Barber d/b/a Ed’s Excavating, Defendant, Jeff Schreiner d/b/a Schreiner and Sons Construction, Defendant, Morton Buildings, Inc., Appellant, Allied Design Architectural & Engineering Group, P.C., Appellant.
No. WD 63236.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
March 29, 2005.
James P. Valbracht, Chillieothe, MO, for appellant.
Frederick K. Starrett, Overland Park, KS, for respondent.
Before HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, Presiding Judge, JAMES M. SMART, JR., Judge and JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Morton Buildings, Inc. and Allied Design Architectural and Engineering Group appeal from judgments entered against them in the Circuit Court of Grundy County in a negligence action filed by the City of Bethany, Missouri, over damages sus tained by the city library building during the construction of an adjacent building. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, that no error of law appears, and that an opinion would have no precedential value.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).