Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Pedro MONDRAGON-GONZALEZ, also known as Pedro Gonzalez Mondragon, also known as Pedro Mondragongonzalez, also known as Pedro Gonzalez, also known as Pedor Gonzalez-Mondragon, also known as Pedro Gonzales Mondragon, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-12-15
Citations: 624 F. App'x 278
Docket Number: No. 15-20189
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Pedro MONDRAGON-GONZALEZ, also known as Pedro Gonzalez Mondragon, also known as Pedro Mondragongonzalez, also known as Pedro Gonzalez, also known as Pedor Gonzalez-Mondragon, also known as Pedro Gonzales Mondragon, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before JONES, SOUTHWICK, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 624
Pages: 278–278

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Pedro MONDRAGON-GONZALEZ, also known as Pedro Gonzalez Mondragon, also known as Pedro Mondragongonzalez, also known as Pedro Gonzalez, also known as Pedor Gonzalez-Mondragon, also known as Pedro Gonzales Mondragon, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-20189
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 15, 2015.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender H. Michael Sokolow, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Pedro Mondragon-Gonzalez Three Rivers, TX, pro se.
Before JONES, SOUTHWICK, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Pedro Mondragon-Gonzalez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Mondragon-Gonzalez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.