Case Name: Jose Diaz, Appellant, v. Victor Nunez et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2004-03-25
Citations: 5 A.D.3d 302
Docket Number: 
Parties: Jose Diaz, Appellant, v Victor Nunez et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 5
Pages: 302–303

Head Matter:
Jose Diaz, Appellant, v Victor Nunez et al., Respondents.
[774 NYS2d 500]

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.), entered February 13, 2003, which granted defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion denied and the complaint reinstated.
In moving for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiff did not suffer a "serious injury" within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), defendants submitted the affirmed report of only one medical expert, a radiologist. The sole basis for the expert's report was her review of x-rays created at an unknown location on June 18, 2000, a date four months prior to the subject automobile accident. The expert's report does not set forth the basis, if any, for her understanding that the x-rays she examined depicted plaintiff, nor is there any other evidence in the record to indicate that any x-rays of plaintiff were made in June 2000. Since defendants' motion papers thus failed to meet their burden to establish a prima facie case that plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury, the motion for summary judgment should have been denied regardless of the sufficiency of plaintiffs opposing papers (see e.g. Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Ellerin and Friedman, JJ.