Case Name: David ELLIOTT, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1996-12-03
Citations: 941 S.W.2d 530
Docket Number: No. 70344
Parties: David ELLIOTT, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 941
Pages: 530–530

Head Matter:
David ELLIOTT, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 70344.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Dec. 3, 1996.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 30, 1997.
Application to Transfer Denied April 29, 1997.
Nancy L. Vincent, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for movant-appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Cheryl A. Caponegro, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant appeals from the dismissal of his Rule 24.035 motion without prejudice. The motion court dismissed the motion as prematurely filed because Movant has not yet been delivered to the Missouri Department of Corrections. Movant alleges the trial court erred in applying the delivery requirement because it denies him due process and is contrary to the stated goals of the rule. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum detailing our reasons for affirming the judgment of the trial court. Rule 84.16(b).