Case Name: In re ESTATE OF John E. HORNER, Deceased, Omega Bank, Executor of the Estate of John E. Horner, Deceased, Successor to John E. Horner, An Incapacitated Person by his Limited Guardian, The Peoples National Bank of Central Pennsylvania, Respondents, v. Kenneth E. HORNER, Petitioner
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2003-12-04
Citations: 840 A.2d 992
Docket Number: Nos. 478 & 479 MAL 2003
Parties: In re ESTATE OF John E. HORNER, Deceased, Omega Bank, Executor of the Estate of John E. Horner, Deceased, Successor to John E. Horner, An Incapacitated Person by his Limited Guardian, The Peoples National Bank of Central Pennsylvania, Respondents, v. Kenneth E. HORNER, Petitioner.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 840
Pages: 992–992

Head Matter:
In re ESTATE OF John E. HORNER, Deceased, Omega Bank, Executor of the Estate of John E. Horner, Deceased, Successor to John E. Horner, An Incapacitated Person by his Limited Guardian, The Peoples National Bank of Central Pennsylvania, Respondents, v. Kenneth E. HORNER, Petitioner.
Nos. 478 & 479 MAL 2003.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Dec. 4, 2003.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 4th day of December 2003, the Petitions for Allowance of Appeal are GRANTED, the order of the Superior Court is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of Centre County for entry of an order conforming to Pa.R.C.P. 1517(a). See Chalkey v. Roush, 569 Pa. 462, 805 A.2d 491, 497 (2002) (given confusion in courts below concerning whether party must file post-trial motions to preserve issues following equity trial where court's order fails to comply with Rule 1517(a), holding requiring such motions is made prospective and pending matter remanded for court to enter order conforming to Rule 1517(a)).