Case Name: Christa M. MADOCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John M. McHUGH, Secretary of the Army, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-03-16
Citations: 469 F. App'x 200
Docket Number: No. 11-1920
Parties: Christa M. MADOCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John M. McHUGH, Secretary of the Army, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 469
Pages: 200–200

Head Matter:
Christa M. MADOCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John M. McHUGH, Secretary of the Army, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 11-1920.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 6, 2012.
Decided: March 16, 2012.
Thomas S. Gill, Thomas S. Gill, P.C., Frederick, Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Michael P. Grady, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appel-lee.
Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Christa M. Madock appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of John M. McHugh, the Secretary of the United States Army, in this employment discrimination action filed pursuant to Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 ("Rehabilitation Act"), 29 U.S.C.A. § 701-7961 (West 2008 & Supp. 2011). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Madock v. McHugh, No. 1:10-cv-02706-ELH, 2011 WL 3654460 (D.Md. Aug. 18, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.