Case Name: UNITED STATES, Appellee v CURTIS GRAHAM, JR., Airman Third Class, and HERMAN WHITE, Airman Second Class, U. S. Air Force, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Military Appeals
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1959-01-02
Citations: 10 C.M.A. 101
Docket Number: No. 12,263
Parties: UNITED STATES, Appellee v CURTIS GRAHAM, JR., Airman Third Class, and HERMAN WHITE, Airman Second Class, U. S. Air Force, Appellant
Judges: Judge LATIMER concurs.
Reporter: Decisions of the United States Court of Military Appeals
Volume: 10
Pages: 101–101

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES, Appellee v CURTIS GRAHAM, JR., Airman Third Class, and HERMAN WHITE, Airman Second Class, U. S. Air Force, Appellant
10 USCMA 101, 27 CMR 175
No. 12,263
Decided January 2, 1959
Lieutenant Colonel Sam F. Carter and Captain John H. Leonard were on the brief for Appellant, Accused.
Lieutenant Colonel Robert W. Michels and Captain La%vrence J. Gross were on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion:
Opinion of the Court
ROBERT E. Quinn, Chief Judge:
The accused were tried in a common trial for separate larcenies committed in the same places at the same time. No objection to a common trial was made at any time. At trial, defense counsel represented that "we felt that in the best interests of both accused . . . [the cases] should be tried" in common. Nothing in the record of trial indicates that either accused was prejudiced in any material respect by the trial in common. Under the circumstances, if there was impropriety in directing a common trial, it was waived by the accused. United States v Williams, 10 USCMA 33, 27 CMR 107.
The decision of the board of review is affirmed.
Judge LATIMER concurs.