Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tomas SALINAS-RUIZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-01-14
Citations: 308 F. App'x 147
Docket Number: No. 08-30168
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tomas SALINAS-RUIZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 308
Pages: 147–147

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tomas SALINAS-RUIZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-30168.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 17, 2008.
Filed Jan. 14, 2009.
Donald E. Kresse, Jr., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Yakima, WA, for Plaintiff-Ap-pellee.
Rebecca L. Pennell, Federal Defenders of Eastern Washington & Idaho, Yakima, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: GOODWIN, TROTT, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Tomas Salinas-Ruiz appeals from the district court's order denying his motion to dismiss the indictment charging him with being an alien in the United States after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Salinas-Ruiz contends that the district court erred by denying his motion to dismiss the indictment because the indictment did not allege that his prior removal occurred subsequent to a felony conviction. This contention fails. See Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 226-27, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998); see also United States v. Salazar-Lopez, 506 F.3d 748, 752 (9th Cir.2007).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.