Case Name: Ellus Franklin BUSH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1963-05-29
Citations: 370 S.W.2d 875
Docket Number: No. 35836
Parties: Ellus Franklin BUSH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 370
Pages: 875–875

Head Matter:
Ellus Franklin BUSH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
No. 35836.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
May 29, 1963.
Rehearing Denied Oct. 16, 1963.
L. Eugene Cunningham, Houston (On Appeal Only) for appellant.
Frank Briscoe, Dist. Atty., Carl E. F. Dally, Asst. Dist. Atty., Houston, and Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
McDonald, judge.
This is a conviction for the misdemeanor offense of driving while intoxicated, with punishment assessed at a fine of $150 and ten days in jail.
A formal bill of exception was presented to the trial court, who refused to approve the bill for the reasons therein stated. The appellant took no further action and neither accepted nor agreed to the court's reasons for refusing the bill. No bystanders' bills of exception were filed.
The formal bill of exception is therefore not properly before this court for consideration. Art. 760d, Vernon's Ann.C.C.P.; Campos v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 356 S.W.2d 317; Cook v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 356 S.W.2d 149; Rogers v. State, 170 Tex.Cr.R. 257, 340 S.W.2d 300; Thompson v. State, 170 Tex.Cr.R. 258, 339 S.W.2d 209.
The record on appeal contains no statement of facts.
All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review.
Finding no reversible error, the judgment is affirmed.