Case Name: JAMES FULTON versus THOMAS PALMER, DAVID C. McKINSTRY, and GEORGE PALMER
Court: Michigan Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Michigan
Decision Date: 1836
Citations: 5 Blume Sup. Ct. Trans. 162
Docket Number: 
Parties: JAMES FULTON versus THOMAS PALMER, DAVID C. McKINSTRY, and GEORGE PALMER.
Judges: 
Reporter: Transactions of the Supreme Court of the territory of Michigan
Volume: 5
Pages: 162–162

Head Matter:
JAMES FULTON versus THOMAS PALMER, DAVID C. McKINSTRY, and GEORGE PALMER.

Opinion:
Journal Entries (1836): Journal5: (1) Rule to plead, answer, or demur *p. 138.
Papers in File: (i) Bill of complaint; (2-3) writs of subpoena and return; (4) demurrer; (5) prec-ipe to set demurrer for argument; (6) motion for rule to answer and for attachment for contempt; (7) plea; (8) precipe to set plea for hearing; (9) motion to refer bill and plea to master; (10) motion to overrule plea; (11) answer; (12) draft of order taking bill as confessed.
Chancery Case 222 of 1836.