Case Name: Laura DOUGLAS, Appellant, v. The FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF REGENTS, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-10-24
Citations: 550 So. 2d 1173
Docket Number: No. 88-2559
Parties: Laura DOUGLAS, Appellant, v. The FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF REGENTS, Appellee.
Judges: Before BASKIN, FERGUSON and COPE, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 550
Pages: 1173–1174

Head Matter:
Laura DOUGLAS, Appellant, v. The FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF REGENTS, Appellee.
No. 88-2559.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 24, 1989.
Spencer & Klein and Samuel B. Reiner, II, Miami, for appellant.
Stuzin & Camner and Jeffrey Sloman and Arlette M.. Molina and Diane Ferraro, Miami, for appellee.
Before BASKIN, FERGUSON and COPE, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The record contains no evidence that the Florida State Board of Regents acted in a "capricious, prejudicial, or arbitrary manner." Militana v. University of Miami, 236 So.2d 162 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 962, 91 S.Ct. 970, 28 L.Ed.2d 245 (1971). No genuine issue of material fact exists and, as a matter of law, appellee is entitled to summary judgment in its favor. Anderson v. Maddox, 65 So.2d 299 (Fla.1953); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.510(c).
Affirmed.