Case Name: Gregory CRAWFORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-06-06
Citations: 19 S.W.3d 710
Docket Number: No. ED 76688
Parties: Gregory CRAWFORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J. and PAUL J. SIMON and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 19
Pages: 710–710

Head Matter:
Gregory CRAWFORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 76688.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
June 6, 2000.
S. Paige Canfield, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Gregory L. Barnes, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J. and PAUL J. SIMON and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Gregory Crawford, defendant, appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Defendant contends the motion court erred in denying his motion, alleging that his counsel was ineffective in failing to investigate and elicit testimony from Officer Brown and Antonio Crawford, witnesses who would have allegedly provided appellant with a defense.
We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).