Case Name: In the Matter of A. B. C., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. A. B. C., Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2014-10-15
Citations: 266 Or. App. 401
Docket Number: 120970158; A152751
Parties: In the Matter of A. B. C., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. A. B. C., Appellant.
Judges: Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Nakamoto, Judge, and Egan, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 266
Pages: 401–402

Head Matter:
Submitted September 5,
reversed October 15, 2014
In the Matter of A. B. C., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. A. B. C., Appellant.
Multnomah County Circuit Court
120970158; A152751
337 P3d 983
Garrett A. Richardson and Multnomah Defenders, Inc., filed the brief for appellant.
Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General, and Andrew M. Lavin, Senior Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Nakamoto, Judge, and Egan, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. He contends that the state failed to prove, by clear and convincing evidence, that, because of a mental disorder, he is a danger to himself. ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state's concession, and reverse on that basis. Accordingly, we do not address appellant's other, unpreserved assignment of error, in which he contends that the trial court erred in failing to advise him of the possible results of the commitment proceeding as required by ORS 426.100(l)(c).
Reversed.