Case Name: Byron R. CLAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2004-12-22
Citations: 889 So. 2d 985
Docket Number: No. 4D04-3784
Parties: Byron R. CLAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: FARMER, C.J., STONE and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 889
Pages: 985–986

Head Matter:
Byron R. CLAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D04-3784.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Dec. 22, 2004.
Byron R. Clay, Miami, pro se.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and David M. Schultz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed, without prejudice to appellant filing in the trial court a facially sufficient Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion that identifies specific non-hearsay, record evidence that supports his claim. Burgess v. State, 831 So.2d 137 (Fla.2002); Wachter v. State, 868 So.2d 629 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). Appellant may raise the alleged violation of Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993), in a rule 3.850 motion if he can establish a valid exception to the two-year time limitation. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b).
FARMER, C.J., STONE and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.