Case Name: Anthony N. YENGWIA, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-10-25
Citations: 146 F. App'x 664
Docket Number: No. 05-1344
Parties: Anthony N. YENGWIA, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 146
Pages: 664–665

Head Matter:
Anthony N. YENGWIA, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 05-1344.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 2, 2005.
Decided Oct. 25, 2005.
Patrick G. Tzeuton, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, James A. Hunolt, Senior Litigation Counsel, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Anthony N. Yengwia, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("Board") denying his motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board's order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Yengwia's motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2005); INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24, 112 S.Ct. 719, 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Yengwia, No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ] (B.I.A. Mar. 7, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED