Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JUVENILE FEMALE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-06-08
Citations: 436 F. App'x 796
Docket Number: No. 10-30272
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JUVENILE FEMALE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: PREGERSON, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 436
Pages: 796–797

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JUVENILE FEMALE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-30272.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 24, 2011.
Filed June 8, 2011.
Before: PREGERSON, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Appellant, a juvenile, appeals from the nine-month sentence imposed following revocation of juvenile delinquent supervision. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Appellant contends that the district court's sentence contravenes the rehabilitative purposes of the Federal Juvenile Delinquency Act, 18 U.S.C. § 5031 et seq. (FJDA), because it reflects impermissible factors and was not the least restrictive means of achieving these purposes. The record reflects that the district court adequately considered the relevant factors within the FJDA while accounting for the totality of Appellant's unique circumstances and rehabilitative needs, and imposed a sentence that was the least restrictive means to meet those needs. See United States v. Juvenile, 347 F.3d 778, 787 (9th Cir.2003).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.