Case Name: David MILLSAP, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-11-14
Citations: 205 S.W.3d 323
Docket Number: No. ED 86874
Parties: David MILLSAP, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 205
Pages: 323–324

Head Matter:
David MILLSAP, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 86874.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Nov. 14, 2006.
Scott Thompson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Shaun J. MacKelprang, Assistant Attorney General, Evan J. Buchheim, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, David Millsap, appeals from a judgment denying on the merits, after an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.
The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detañed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).