Case Name: Cleveland ROSIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-10-10
Citations: 586 So. 2d 516
Docket Number: No. 90-3044
Parties: Cleveland ROSIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: BOOTH, MINER and ALLEN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 586
Pages: 516–517

Head Matter:
Cleveland ROSIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 90-3044.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Oct. 10, 1991.
Nancy Daniels, Public Defender, Lynn A. Williams, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Suzanne G. Printy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellant, Cleveland Rosier, challenges the imposition of an enhanced sentence pursuant to the habitual felony offender statute. Specifically, appellant argues that the trial court sentenced him with an erroneous understanding of his prior criminal behavior. We agree, and find that at sentencing the trial court incorrectly recited appellant's criminal history, citing offenses not contained within appellant's presentence investigation and not supported by evidence produced at the sentencing hearing. We reject appellee's as sertion that these errors were harmless. Because we cannot determine whether the errors were crucial to the trial court's decision to impose a habitual felony offender sentence, we reverse and remand for resen-tencing.
BOOTH, MINER and ALLEN, JJ., concur.