Case Name: Stephen Alan ALBERTS, II, Ed.D., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WHEELING JESUIT UNIVERSITY, Defendant-Appellee, and Dr. Letha Zook, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-01-09
Citations: 461 F. App'x 239
Docket Number: No. 11-1596
Parties: Stephen Alan ALBERTS, II, Ed.D., Plaintiff—Appellant, v. WHEELING JESUIT UNIVERSITY, Defendant—Appellee, and Dr. Letha Zook, Defendant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 461
Pages: 239–239

Head Matter:
Stephen Alan ALBERTS, II, Ed.D., Plaintiff—Appellant, v. WHEELING JESUIT UNIVERSITY, Defendant—Appellee, and Dr. Letha Zook, Defendant.
No. 11-1596.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 30, 2011.
Decided: Jan. 9, 2012.
Stephen Alan Alberts, II, Appellant Pro Se. Jacob A. Manning, Christopher Pauli Riley, Dinsmore & Shohl, LLP, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Stephen Alan Alberts, II, appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment on his retaliation claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e to 2000e-17 (2006), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 621 to 634 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error or evidence of judicial bias. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Alberts v. Wheeling Jesuit University, No. 5:09-cv-00109-FPS-JES, 2011 WL 2132983 (N.D.W.Va. May 25, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.