Case Name: LOUIS F. BOTJER, PLAINTIFF, v. SHERMAN DENNIS ET AL., DEFENDANTS
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1929-03-20
Citations: 7 N.J. Misc. 314
Docket Number: 
Parties: LOUIS F. BOTJER, PLAINTIFF, v. SHERMAN DENNIS ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 7
Pages: 314–314

Head Matter:
LOUIS F. BOTJER, PLAINTIFF, v. SHERMAN DENNIS ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
Submitted October 13, 1928
Decided March 20, 1929.
Before Justices Teenchabd, Kalisch and Lloyd.
Eor the rule, Wall, Haight, Carey & Hartpence and Slolces, McDermott & Hartshorne.
Contra, William B. Stites.

Opinion:
Pee Cueiam.
This is defendants' rule to show cause why the venue should not be changed from the county of Hudson, where it laid in the complaint, to the county of Monmouth.
We have examined the depositions taken pursuant to the rule and laid before us. The result of our examination is that we are persuaded that the defendants are entitled to have the case tried in Monmouth county, and for that purpose to have the venue changed to that county.
Accordingly, it will be ordered that the venue be changed to the county of Monmouth.