Case Name: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Jimmy Lee ROSS, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2003-08-28
Citations: 863 So. 2d 137
Docket Number: No. SC01-2456
Parties: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Jimmy Lee ROSS, Respondent.
Judges: ANSTEAD, C.J, and WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 863
Pages: 137–138

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Jimmy Lee ROSS, Respondent.
No. SC01-2456.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Aug. 28, 2003.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Celia Terenzio, Assistant Attorney General, Bureau Chief, and Donna M. Hoffman, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, FL, for Petitioner.
Jimmy Lee Ross, pro se, Belle Glade, FL, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have for review Ross v. State, 804 So.2d 359 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), which expressly and directly conflicts with the decisions in Ray v. State, 772 So.2d 18 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), review denied, 791 So.2d 1100 (Fla.2001), and Kwil v. State, 768 So.2d 502 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). We have jurisdiction. See Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. We accept jurisdiction in this case, quash the decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal, and remand for reconsideration in light of our decision in State v. Lemon, 825 So.2d 927 (Fla.2002).
It is so ordered.
ANSTEAD, C.J, and WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.