Case Name: Jorge TRUJILLO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Francisco M. SANCHEZ, M.D.; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-01-19
Citations: 710 F. App'x 296
Docket Number: No. 17-16650
Parties: Jorge TRUJILLO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Francisco M. SANCHEZ, M.D.; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: REINHARDT, TROTT, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 710
Pages: 296–296

Head Matter:
Jorge TRUJILLO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Francisco M. SANCHEZ, M.D.; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 17-16650
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted January 16, 2018
Filed January 19, 2018
Jorge Trujillo, Pro Se
Frank Anthony Toddre, II, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, AGNY — Office of the Nevada Attorney General (Las Vegas), Las Vegas, NV, for Defendants-Ap-pellees
Before: REINHARDT, TROTT, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Nevada state prisoner Jorge Trujillo appeals pro se from the district court's judgment enforcing the terms of a settlement agreement in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging medical deliberate indifference. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion the district court's enforcement of a settlement agreement. Doi v. Halekulani Corp., 276 F.3d 1131, 1136 (9th Cir. 2002). We affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion in granting defendants' motion to enforce the oral settlement agreement that the parties reached on March 25, 2016, because Trujillo stated that he understood and agreed to the material terms of the agreement during the settlement conference before a neutral mediator. See id. at 1136-40 (district court did not abuse its discretion in enforcing settlement. agreement where material terms of agreement were read into the record and parties agreed to them).
We do not consider Trujillo's contentions regarding whether the settlement agreement was breached because the district court did not reach this issue.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.