Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Curtis D. DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-04-24
Citations: 62 F. App'x 522
Docket Number: No. 03-6274
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Curtis D. DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 62
Pages: 522–522

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Curtis D. DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 03-6274.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 17, 2003.
Decided April 24, 2003.
Curtis D. Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Timothy Richard Murphy, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Curtis D. Davis appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his motion for amendment and correction of the pleadings and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Davis, No. CR-99-55 (E.D. Va. Oct. 10, 2002; Jan. 21, 2003). We decline to consider Davis's claim, asserted for the first time on appeal, that he was improperly sentenced under the Sentencing Guidelines. See Holland v. Big River Minerals Corp., 181 F.3d 597, 605 (4th Cir.1999) (issues not raised in district court will generally not be considered on appeal). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (2002).