Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. THEODORE JOHN KESTNER, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1991-11-13
Citations: 109 Or. App. 684
Docket Number: CF 89-830; CA A67744
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. THEODORE JOHN KESTNER, Appellant.
Judges: Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 109
Pages: 684–685

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted September 27,
conviction affirmed; special condition of probation vacated; remanded for resentencing November 13, 1991
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. THEODORE JOHN KESTNER, Appellant.
(CF 89-830; CA A67744)
820 P2d 824
Jesse Wm. Barton, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem.
Carol J. Fredrick, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.
Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
The state concedes that the trial court erred in imposing a special condition of probation that defendant unconditionally submit to searches. ORS 137.540(2)(m). We accept the concession.
Conviction affirmed; special condition of probation 4 vacated; remanded for resentencing.