Case Name: INTERSTATE PRODUCTION CREDIT ASSOCIATION, Respondent, v. MASTEN et al, Appellants
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1988-03-02
Citations: 89 Or. App. 673
Docket Number: 86-31-CV; CA A40755
Parties: INTERSTATE PRODUCTION CREDIT ASSOCIATION, Respondent, v. MASTEN et al, Appellants.
Judges: Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Newman and Deits, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 89
Pages: 673–674

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted October 14, 1987,
appeal dismissed March 2, 1988
INTERSTATE PRODUCTION CREDIT ASSOCIATION, Respondent, v. MASTEN et al, Appellants.
(86-31-CV; CA A40755)
750 P2d 1163
Richard N. Belcher, Klamath Falls, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief was Zamsky & Belcher, Klamath Falls.
Robert F. L. Trotman, Klamath Falls, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Giacomini, Jones & Trotman, Klamath Falls.
Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Newman and Deits, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendants appeal from a judgment in an action to foreclose on a loan agreement. The judgment is not final or appealable and we dismiss the appeal.
Plaintiff initiated this action and moved for summary judgment two months later. Defendants subsequently filed an answer in which they asserted several affirmative defenses and counterclaims. The court entered a summary judgment in favor of plaintiff on its claim. Although plaintiff asserts that a final judgment was entered, there is nothing in the record indicating that the trial court intended its summary judgment order and accompanying judgment to decide the counterclaims. Defendants did not file their answer until after the summary judgment hearing, and plaintiff did not file a responsive pleading or submit written arguments controverting defendant's counterclaims. The judgment did not dispose of the counterclaims and is not appealable. ORCP 67B.
Appeal dismissed.