Case Name: Mrs. DOE, Individually and as Next Friend of Jane Doe, a Minor, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. S&S CONSOLIDATED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT; Joe Wardell, S&S Consolidated Independent School District Superintendent; Missy Imbert, S&S Elementary School Principal, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-10-07
Citations: 309 F.3d 307
Docket Number: No. 01-40870
Parties: Mrs. DOE, Individually and as Next Friend of Jane Doe, a Minor, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. S&S CONSOLIDATED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT; Joe Wardell, S&S Consolidated Independent School District Superintendent; Missy Imbert, S&S Elementary School Principal, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before KING, Chief Judge, and JONES and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 309
Pages: 307–307

Head Matter:
Mrs. DOE, Individually and as Next Friend of Jane Doe, a Minor, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. S&S CONSOLIDATED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT; Joe Wardell, S&S Consolidated Independent School District Superintendent; Missy Imbert, S&S Elementary School Principal, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 01-40870.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Oct. 7, 2002.
Thomas Boyd Cowart (argued), Lori A. Watson, Law Office of Windle Turley, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Roger D. Hepworth (argued), Sue Melissa Lee, Henslee, Fowler, Hepworth & Schwartz, Austin, TX, for Defendants-Ap-pellees.
Janet Little Horton, Lisa R. McBride, Bracewell & Patterson, Houston, TX, for Texas Ass’n of School Boards Legal Assistance Fund, Amicus Curiae.
Before KING, Chief Judge, and JONES and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Mrs. Doe challenges the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of S&S Consolidated Independent School District, Joe Wardell, and Missy Imbert. The judgment of the district court is affirmed for essentially the reasons given by the district court in its Memorandum Opinion and Order entered on June 26, 2001. Doe v. S&S Consol. Indep. Sch. Dist., 149 F.Supp.2d 274 (E.D.Tex.2001).
AFFIRMED.