Case Name: Johnathan SIMMONS, a/k/a Jonathan Dale Simmons, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John VICKERS; Michael Najjar; Warden McCall; Officer Smith, et al, Defendants-Appellees; Jonathan Dale Simmons, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SCDC; John Vickers; Michael Najjar; Warden McCall; Officer Smith, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-12-27
Citations: 502 F. App'x 270
Docket Number: Nos. 12-7846, 12-7848
Parties: Johnathan SIMMONS, a/k/a Jonathan Dale Simmons, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John VICKERS; Michael Najjar; Warden McCall; Officer Smith, et al, Defendants-Appellees. Jonathan Dale Simmons, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SCDC; John Vickers; Michael Najjar; Warden McCall; Officer Smith, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 502
Pages: 270–270

Head Matter:
Johnathan SIMMONS, a/k/a Jonathan Dale Simmons, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John VICKERS; Michael Najjar; Warden McCall; Officer Smith, et al, Defendants-Appellees. Jonathan Dale Simmons, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SCDC; John Vickers; Michael Najjar; Warden McCall; Officer Smith, Defendants-Appellees.
Nos. 12-7846, 12-7848.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 20, 2012.
Decided: Dec. 27, 2012.
Jonathan Dale Simmons, Appellant Pro Se. James Victor McDade, Doyle, O’Rourke, Tate & McDade, PA, Anderson, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jonathan Simmons appeals the district court's order denying as untimely his motion to alter or amend the court's order awarding the Defendants summary judgment on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Simmons v. Vickers, No. 1:09-cv00653-TLW; Simmons v. S.C. Dep't of Corr., No. 1:09-cv-00858-TLW, 2012 WL 4761432 (D.S.C. Oct. 3; Oct. 2 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.