Case Name: PEOPLE, Appellant, v. JOSE R. DE LA GUERRA, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1866-12-24
Citations: 1 Cal. Unrep. 345
Docket Number: No. 1069
Parties: PEOPLE, Appellant, v. JOSE R. DE LA GUERRA, Respondent.
Judges: We concur: Sawyer, J.; Sanderson, J.
Reporter: California Unreported Cases
Volume: 1
Pages: 345–345

Head Matter:
PEOPLE, Appellant, v. JOSE R. DE LA GUERRA, Respondent.
No. 1069;
December 24, 1866.
Indictment — Specification of Facts of the Offense. — An indictment for crime must conform substantially to the requirements of sections 237 and 238 of the Criminal Practice Act, and must state the facts constituting the offense in ordinary and concise language.
APPEAL from County Court, Santa Barbara County.
Attorney General for appellant; A. Packard for respondent.

Opinion:
CURREY, C. J.
The defendant, the sheriff of Santa Barbara county, was indicted under the sixty-sixth section of the act concerning crimes and punishments, for the crime of embezzling and stealing certain personal property belonging to the county: Laws 1850, p. 236. He demurred to the indictment on the grounds: "1. That it does not substantially conform to the requirements of sections two hundred and thirty-seven and two hundred and thirty-eight of the Criminal Practice Act, and that it does not state the facts constituting the offense in ordinary and concise language; 2. That more than one offense is charged in the indictment; 3. That the facts stated do not constitute a public offense."
The court sustained the demurrer on the second ground assigned and gave judgment for the defendant.
We are of the opinion the judgment should be affirmed, not for the reason that more than one offense is charged in the indictment, but for the cause of demurrer first assigned1. Judgment affirmed.
We concur: Sawyer, J.; Sanderson, J.