Case Name: Larry E. PATTERSON Plaintiff-Appellant, and Elmo A. Reid, Jr.; James R. Clark, Plaintiffs, v. Timothy M. KAINE, Governor of the State of Virginia, sued in his official and individual capacity; John W. Marshall, Secretary of Public Safety of Virginia, sued in his official and individual capacity; Helen F. Fahey, Chairperson of the Virginia Parole Board, sued in her official and individual capacity, Defendants-Appellees, Derek T. Fritzinger; Melvin C. Dodson, Movants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-07-05
Citations: 437 F. App'x 236
Docket Number: No. 10-7703
Parties: Larry E. PATTERSON Plaintiff-Appellant, and Elmo A. Reid, Jr.; James R. Clark, Plaintiffs, v. Timothy M. KAINE, Governor of the State of Virginia, sued in his official and individual capacity; John W. Marshall, Secretary of Public Safety of Virginia, sued in his official and individual capacity; Helen F. Fahey, Chairperson of the Virginia Parole Board, sued in her official and individual capacity, Defendants-Appellees, Derek T. Fritzinger; Melvin C. Dodson, Movants.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 437
Pages: 236–237

Head Matter:
Larry E. PATTERSON Plaintiff-Appellant, and Elmo A. Reid, Jr.; James R. Clark, Plaintiffs, v. Timothy M. KAINE, Governor of the State of Virginia, sued in his official and individual capacity; John W. Marshall, Secretary of Public Safety of Virginia, sued in his official and individual capacity; Helen F. Fahey, Chairperson of the Virginia Parole Board, sued in her official and individual capacity, Defendants-Appellees, Derek T. Fritzinger; Melvin C. Dodson, Movants.
No. 10-7703.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 30, 2011.
Decided: July 5, 2011.
Larry E. Patterson, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Larry E. Patterson appeals the district court's order denying his motion for relief judgment, filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Patterson's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, Patterson has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.