Case Name: Sidney Alexander JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer Adrian ASHFORD, In both his official and individual capacities; Trans World Entertainment Corp., d/b/a F.Y.E.; Westfield, LLC, d/b/a Wheaton Mall, Defendants-Appellees, and PO-1 Ashford, Badge No. 2695; Westfield Group, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-06-01
Citations: 691 F. App'x 113
Docket Number: No. 17-1146
Parties: Sidney Alexander JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer Adrian ASHFORD, In both his official and individual capacities; Trans World Entertainment Corp., d/b/a F.Y.E.; Westfield, LLC, d/b/a Wheaton Mall, Defendants-Appellees, and PO-1 Ashford, Badge No. 2695; Westfield Group, Defendants.
Judges: Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 691
Pages: 113–113

Head Matter:
Sidney Alexander JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer Adrian ASHFORD, In both his official and individual capacities; Trans World Entertainment Corp., d/b/a F.Y.E.; Westfield, LLC, d/b/a Wheaton Mall, Defendants-Appellees, and PO-1 Ashford, Badge No. 2695; Westfield Group, Defendants.
No. 17-1146
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 19, 2017
Decided: June 1, 2017
Sidney Alexander Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Marc Pemble Hansen, Edward B. Lattner, John Paul Markovs, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Rockville, Maryland; Ronald Greer DeWald, LIPSHULTZ & HONE CHARTERED, Silver Spring, Maryland; Brian Thomas Gallager, Michael N. Russo, Jr., COUNCIL, BARA-DEL, KOSMERL & NOLAN, PA, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Sidney Alexander Jones appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, wé affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. Ashford, No. 8:14-cv-03639-TDC, 2017 WL 221783 (D. Md. Jan. 18, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED