Case Name: Frank FOUNTAIN, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Cole JETER, Warden, Federal Medical Center Fort Worth, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-06-21
Citations: 187 F. App'x 379
Docket Number: No. 05-10727
Parties: Frank FOUNTAIN, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Cole JETER, Warden, Federal Medical Center Fort Worth, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 187
Pages: 379–380

Head Matter:
Frank FOUNTAIN, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Cole JETER, Warden, Federal Medical Center Fort Worth, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 05-10727.
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Decided June 21, 2006.
Frank Fountain, Jr., Fort Worth, TX, pro se.
Angie Lee Henson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, for Respondent-Appellee.
Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Frank Fountain, Jr., federal prisoner #97040-079, appeals the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition, which followed his convictions and sentences for wire fraud, mail fraud, and concealing assets. Fountain challenged the constitutionality of his convictions and sentences in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), and Blakely v. Wash ington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004).
The errors asserted by Fountain may not be raised in a § 2241 petition unless they arise under the savings clause of 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We have held that claims based on Booker and Blakely do not fall under the savings clause of § 2255. See Padilla v. United States, 416 F.3d 424, 426-27 (5th Cir.2005). Accordingly, the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.