Case Name: James A. Leary and Another, Copartners, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Leary & Fullerton, Respondents, v. Charlotte Lipkind, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1929-11
Citations: 227 A.D. 835
Docket Number: 
Parties: James A. Leary and Another, Copartners, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Leary & Fullerton, Respondents, v. Charlotte Lipkind, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 227
Pages: 835–835

Head Matter:
James A. Leary and Another, Copartners, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Leary & Fullerton, Respondents, v. Charlotte Lipkind, Appellant.
Appeal dismissed, 253 N. Y.-.

Opinion:
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on the ground that the irregularity in giving notice of the reference did not affect a substantial right of the defendant for she had actual notice thereof and did not appear and make objection; and had made default in appearing on the trial at which the reference was granted. (See Civ. Prac. Act, § 105.) Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman, Davis and Hill, JJ., concur; Hasbrouck, J., dissents.