Case Name: William W. BRADFORD, Jr., Bankrupt, Appellant, v. Michael W. FAHEY, Assignee, John D. Worthington, Annie McC. Worthington and the Potomac Joint Stock Land Bank of Alexandria, Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1935-06-28
Citations: 77 F.2d 992
Docket Number: No. 3778
Parties: William W. BRADFORD, Jr., Bankrupt, Appellant, v. Michael W. FAHEY, Assignee, John D. Worthington, Annie McC. Worthington and the Potomac Joint Stock Land Bank of Alexandria, Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 77
Pages: 992–992

Head Matter:
William W. BRADFORD, Jr., Bankrupt, Appellant, v. Michael W. FAHEY, Assignee, John D. Worthington, Annie McC. Worthington and the Potomac Joint Stock Land Bank of Alexandria, Appellees.
No. 3778.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
June 28, 1935.
For original opinion, see 76 F.(2d) 628.
For opinion below, see 7 F. Supp. 665.
Morton P. Fisher and Allan H. Fisher, both of Baltimore, Md. (A. Freeborn Brown, of Bel Air, Md., on the brief), for appellant.
Wade B. Hampton, of Washington, D. C., and Clarence E. Martin, of Martinsburg, W. Va. (Robinson & Fahey, of Bel Air, Md., on the brief), for appellees Michael W. Fahey, Assignee, and Potomac Joint Stock Land Bank of Alexandria.
Herbert Levy, of Baltimore, Md. (Morris Rosenberg, of Baltimore, Md., on the brief), for appellees John D. Worthington and Annie McC. Worthington, his wife.
Edwin A. Krauthoff, of Chicago, Ill., amicus curiae.
Before PARKER, NORTHCOTT, and SOPER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
A rehearing in this case has been granted because of the recent decision of the Supreme Court in Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. William W. Radford, Sr., 55 S. Ct. 854, 79 L. Ed. -, holding the Act of June 28, 1934, known as the Frazier-Lemke Act (11 USCA § 203 (s), void because violative of constitutional provisions. This case is clearly ruled by that decision; and, on the authority thereof, our previous decision is set aside and the decision of the court below is affirmed.
Affirmed.