Case Name: Darcy Craig PENICHET, Appellant, v. AMERICAN RECRUITERS CONSOLIDATED, INC., American Recruiters of South Florida, Inc., a Florida corporation, and Executive Futures, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2006-05-31
Citations: 929 So. 2d 738
Docket Number: No. 4D05-2139
Parties: Darcy Craig PENICHET, Appellant, v. AMERICAN RECRUITERS CONSOLIDATED, INC., American Recruiters of South Florida, Inc., a Florida corporation, and Executive Futures, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.
Judges: WARNER, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 929
Pages: 738–739

Head Matter:
Darcy Craig PENICHET, Appellant, v. AMERICAN RECRUITERS CONSOLIDATED, INC., American Recruiters of South Florida, Inc., a Florida corporation, and Executive Futures, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.
No. 4D05-2139.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
May 31, 2006.
Kevin Markow and Joann Nesta Burnett of Becker & Poliakoff, P.A., Fort Lauder-dale, for appellant.
Sarah Weitz, Paul 0. Lopez, and Alexander D. Brown of Tripp Scott, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the final judgment entered against Darcy Penichet, which arose from an order imposing sanctions against Peni-chet for failure to post a bond.
This case arose from a 2002 settlement agreement. The agreement required that a bond be posted upon the breach of certain conditions. The agreement also provided the remedy upon the failure to post a bond — a default final judgment was to be entered against a corporation that was a party to the settlement agreement. The circuit court's final judgment against Peni-chet exceeds the remedy that the parties bargained for in the settlement agreement.
Reversed and remanded.
WARNER, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.