Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Francisco VARGAS-REYES, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-08-18
Citations: 71 F. App'x 766
Docket Number: No. 01-10202; D.C. No. CR-00-01007-SMM
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Francisco VARGAS-REYES, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, HAWKINS, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 71
Pages: 766–766

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Francisco VARGAS-REYES, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 01-10202. D.C. No. CR-00-01007-SMM.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 11, 2003.
Decided Aug. 18, 2003.
Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, HAWKINS, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Jose Francisco Vargas-Reyes appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for illegal reentry after removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.
Counsel for Vargas-Reyes has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Vargas-Reyes has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no further issues for review. Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.