Case Name: In re Rebecca L. MARQUEZ, Respondent
Court: District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Decision Date: 2013-04-04
Citations: 63 A.3d 1059
Docket Number: No. 13-BG-19
Parties: In re Rebecca L. MARQUEZ, Respondent.
Judges: BEFORE: THOMPSON, Associate Judge, and TERRY and REID, Senior Judges.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 63
Pages: 1059–1060

Head Matter:
In re Rebecca L. MARQUEZ, Respondent.
No. 13-BG-19.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Filed April 4, 2013.
BEFORE: THOMPSON, Associate Judge, and TERRY and REID, Senior Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
On consideration of the certified consent order from the state of Virginia that imposed an impairment suspension on respondent, this court's February 11, 2013, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing her to show cause why the functionally equivalent reciprocal discipline in the form of a disability suspension pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 13(e) should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file a response to this court's order to show cause or the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is
ORDERED that Rebecca L. Marquez, is hereby suspended pursuant to a disability suspension under D.C. Bar R. XI, § 13(e) in the District of Columbia. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C.2010), and In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007) (re-buttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate). It is
FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent's suspension will not begin to run until such time as she files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C.Bar. R. XI, § 14(g).