Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lauro Alfonso VALDEZ-RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-12-08
Citations: 210 F. App'x 597
Docket Number: No. 06-10432
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lauro Alfonso VALDEZ-RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: GOODWIN, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 210
Pages: 597–598

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lauro Alfonso VALDEZ-RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-10432.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 4, 2006 .
Filed Dec. 8, 2006.
Robert A. Bork, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Las Vegas, NV, for PlaintiffAppellee.
Spencer Rice, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: GOODWIN, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Lauro Alfonso Valdez-Ramirez appeals the 41-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to being found in the United States after illegal re-entry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Valdez-Ramirez contends that the district court violated his constitutional rights by imposing a sentence in excess of the two-year maximum set forth in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) based on a prior conviction that was neither proved to a jury nor admitted during the plea colloquy. Valdez-Ramirez concedes, and we agree, that this contention is foreclosed. See United States v. Beng-Salazar, 452 F.3d 1088, 1091 (9th Cir.2006).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.