Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Victor Manuel GARCIA-LARIOS, also known as Victor Larios-Garcia, Defendant-Appellant; United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Victor Manuel Garcia-Larios, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-08-01
Citations: 694 F. App'x 296
Docket Number: No. 16-41280 Consolidated with 16-41281 Summary Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Victor Manuel GARCIA-LARIOS, also known as Victor Larios-Garcia, Defendant-Appellant United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Victor Manuel Garcia-Larios, Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 694
Pages: 296–297

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Victor Manuel GARCIA-LARIOS, also known as Victor Larios-Garcia, Defendant-Appellant United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Victor Manuel Garcia-Larios, Defendant-Appellant
No. 16-41280 Consolidated with 16-41281 Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed August 1, 2017
Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Philip Thomas Cowen, Esq., Law Office of Philip Cowen, Brownsville, TX, for Defendant-Appellant
Victor Manuel Garcia-Larios, Pro Se
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Victor Manuel Garcia-Larios has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Garcia-Larios has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeals present no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEALS ARE DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.