Case Name: CITY OF NEW ORLEANS v. Yvonne MARTIN
Court: Louisiana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1972-02-08
Citations: 257 So. 2d 152
Docket Number: No. 52140
Parties: CITY OF NEW ORLEANS v. Yvonne MARTIN.
Judges: BARHAM, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted. The ordinance appears unconstitutional on its face being over-broad in scope, ambiguous, and inconsistent and violative of First Amendment U.S. Const. See Coates v. City of Cincinnati, 402 U.S. 611, 91 S.Ct. 1686, 29 L.Ed.2d 214 (1971).
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 257
Pages: 152–152

Head Matter:
260 La. 691
CITY OF NEW ORLEANS v. Yvonne MARTIN.
No. 52140.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Feb. 8, 1972.

Opinion:
In re: Yvonne Martin applying for writs of review, certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.
Writ refused. The judgment of the lower court is correct.
BARHAM, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted. The ordinance appears unconstitutional on its face being over-broad in scope, ambiguous, and inconsistent and violative of First Amendment U.S. Const. See Coates v. City of Cincinnati, 402 U.S. 611, 91 S.Ct. 1686, 29 L.Ed.2d 214 (1971).