Case Name: GAUSS-SHELTON HAT COMPANY, Respondent, v. BOYCE et al., Appellants; DOBSON et al., Respondents, v. BOYCE et al., Appellants
Court: Montana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Montana
Decision Date: 1895-11-04
Citations: 17 Mont. 87
Docket Number: 
Parties: GAUSS-SHELTON HAT COMPANY, Respondent, v. BOYCE et al., Appellants. DOBSON et al., Respondents, v. BOYCE et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Montana Reports
Volume: 17
Pages: 87–87

Head Matter:
GAUSS-SHELTON HAT COMPANY, Respondent, v. BOYCE et al., Appellants. DOBSON et al., Respondents, v. BOYCE et al., Appellants.
[Submitted October 21, 1895.
Decided November 4, 1895.]
See syllabus and opinion in John V. Farwell Co. v. Boyce, ante, page 83.
Appeal from Second Judicial District, Silver Bow County.
Actions of replevin. Judgment in each case was rendered in favor of the plaintiffs below by McHatton, J.
Affirmed.
Forbis & Forbis, for Appellants.
Corbett ds Wellcome, for Respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
These cases are similar to that of John V. Farwell Co. v. Boyce, ante, page 83. The three cases were all briefed and argued together, and counsel stated that the decision of one would determine the others. The judgment and order denying the new trial in these two cases are therefore affirmed.