Case Name: MASSIE v. LOUQUE. WHITE et al. v. LOUQUE et al.
Court: Louisiana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1901-12-16
Citations: 109 La. 769
Docket Number: No. 14,133
Parties: MASSIE v. LOUQUE. WHITE et al. v. LOUQUE et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Louisiana Reports
Volume: 109
Pages: 769–775

Head Matter:
(33 South. 764.)
No. 14,133.
MASSIE v. LOUQUE. WHITE et al. v. LOUQUE et al.
(Dec. 16, 1901.)
(Dec. 1, 1902.)
RIGHT TO APPEAL — NECESSARY PARTIES.
1. The vendor of real estate transferred one of the two notes given for the purchase price. At the maturity of the notes he and the transferee instituted separate suits in foreclosure of the notes and of the mortgage stipulated in the act of sale to secure them, and these suits were consolidated. The purchaser was a corporation. It enjoined the foreclosure proceedings, claiming that it had been evicted from part of the property, and was entitled to a diminution of price, and that, as a result of this diminution, the vendor should restore part of the cash portion of the price, and the notes be declared null because of failure of consideration; also that the notes were prescribed. Before the trial the vendor transferred his rights in the suit to his coplaintiff in the executory process. One of the stockholders of the plaintiff in injunction sought to make himself a party to the suit by intervention and third opposition, but, on exception of his being without interest or standing in the suit, he was excluded. From a judgment dismissing the injunction suit this stockholder took an appeal under the provision of our law permitting third persons to appeal; but he failed to make the vendor a party to the appeal. On motion to dismiss the appeals, held: First, that such stockholder was a third person, notwithstanding his unsuccessful attempt to become a party to the suit; secondly, that the vendor, both as defendant in the suit for diminution and as warrantor on the notes, had an interest in maintaining the judgment appealed from, and that the failure to cite him was fatal to the appeal.
(Syllabus by the Court.)
Appeal from judicial district court, parish of Plaquemines; Robert Hingle, Judge.
Action by Jessie H. Massie against Charles Louque and by Robert M. White, Jessie H. Massie subrogated, against Charles Louque and others. Actions consolidated. Charles O. Buck intervenes. Judgment for plaintiff, and intervener appeals.
Dismissed.
Gurley & Mellen, for appellant Charles C. Buck. E. Howard McCaleb, for appellee Massie.
Rehearing denied March 2, 1903.

Opinion:
On Motion to Dismiss.
NICHOLLS, C. J.
We think it best to postpone action on this motion until after the parties should have been heard upon the issues involved. We therefore decline to dismiss the appeal in limine. Action on the motion is postponed, and the clerk is directed to place the case upon our docket to be heard upon the merits.