Case Name: William N. PIZARRO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. McDONALD'S RESTAURANT; Joselin Cabrera; John Doe; Jane Doe; Betor Foods Inc.; Gallagher Basset Services Inc.; Sparta Insurance; McDonald's Corporation, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-12-26
Citations: 491 F. App'x 426
Docket Number: No. 12-1869
Parties: William N. PIZARRO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. McDONALD’S RESTAURANT; Joselin Cabrera; John Doe; Jane Doe; Betor Foods Inc.; Gallagher Basset Services Inc.; Sparta Insurance; McDonald’s Corporation, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 491
Pages: 426–427

Head Matter:
William N. PIZARRO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. McDONALD’S RESTAURANT; Joselin Cabrera; John Doe; Jane Doe; Betor Foods Inc.; Gallagher Basset Services Inc.; Sparta Insurance; McDonald’s Corporation, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 12-1869.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 20, 2012.
Decided: Dec. 26, 2012.
William N. Pizarro, Appellant Pro Se.
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
William N. Pizarro appeals the district court's order transferring his civil action to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 686(b)(1)(B) (West 2006 & Supp.2012). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Pizarro that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation.
The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge's recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir.1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 106 S.Ct. 466, 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985). Pizarro has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.