Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edith ANDRADE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-01-17
Citations: 164 F. App'x 569
Docket Number: No. 04-50203
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Edith ANDRADE, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 164
Pages: 569–570

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Edith ANDRADE, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 04-50203.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 9, 2006.
Filed Jan. 17, 2006.
Before: HUG, O’SCANNLAIN and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R,App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Edith Andrade appeals from her 15-month sentence imposed following her guilty plea to importation of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 952 and 960. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
Because Andrade was sentenced under the then-mandatory Sentencing Guidelines, and we cannot reliably determine from the record whether the sentence imposed would have been materially different had the district court known that the Guidelines were advisory, we remand the sentence for further proceedings consistent with United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez, 419 F.3d 906, 916 (9th Cir.2005).
REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.