Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Burnie Lee RANDALL, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-10-22
Citations: 334 F. App'x 538
Docket Number: No. 09-7341
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Burnie Lee RANDALL, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 334
Pages: 538–539

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Burnie Lee RANDALL, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 09-7341.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 15, 2009.
Decided: Oct. 22, 2009.
Burnie Lee Randall, Appellant Pro Se. Rose Mary Sheppard Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Burnie Lee Randall appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a reduction in sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the distinct court. United States v. Randall, No. 4:06-cr-00583-TLW-6 (D.S.C. June 30, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.