Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Jesus MORA, a/k/a Jose Jesus Nuesslein, a/k/a Joe Mora, a/k/a Jose Jesus Neusslein, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-04-30
Citations: 472 F. App'x 208
Docket Number: No. 11-7673
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Jesus MORA, a/k/a Jose Jesus Nuesslein, a/k/a Joe Mora, a/k/a Jose Jesus Neusslein, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 472
Pages: 208–208

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Jesus MORA, a/k/a Jose Jesus Nuesslein, a/k/a Joe Mora, a/k/a Jose Jesus Neusslein, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-7673.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 26, 2012.
Decided: April 30, 2012.
Jose Jesus Mora, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Westley Haynie, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Jose Mora appeals the district court's order denying his motion to amend special conditions of supervision and has filed motions for appointment of counsel and to expedite. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny appointment of counsel, deny Mora's motion to expedite as moot, and affirm the district court's order. See United States v. Mora, No. 2:07-cr-00062-RAJ-JEB-1 (E.D.Va. Nov. 14, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.