Case Name: CHONG SU YI, And People of Similarly Situated., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW ORLEANS, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-12-19
Citations: 671 F. App'x 177
Docket Number: No. 16-1719
Parties: CHONG SU YI, And People of Similarly Situated., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW ORLEANS, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 671
Pages: 177–177

Head Matter:
CHONG SU YI, And People of Similarly Situated., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW ORLEANS, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 16-1719
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: December 15, 2016
Decided: December 19, 2016
Chong Su Yi, Appellant Pro Se.
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Chong Su Yi appeals the district court's orders dismissing his complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2012) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we modify the district court's dismissal order to show that it is without prejudice and affirm, as modified for the reasons stated by the district court. Yi v. Archdiocese of New Orleans, No. 8:16-cv-01073-TDC (D. Md. Apr. 22 & May 31, 2016); see also Nagy v. FMC Butner, 376 F.3d 252, 258 (4th Cir. 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED