Case Name: LOUIS LATT AND ROSE LATT, TO THE USE OF EMANUEL MALAMUT, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. ERNEST SCHWEHM, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1933-10-16
Citations: 111 N.J.L. 493
Docket Number: 
Parties: LOUIS LATT AND ROSE LATT, TO THE USE OF EMANUEL MALAMUT, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. ERNEST SCHWEHM, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 111
Pages: 493–493

Head Matter:
LOUIS LATT AND ROSE LATT, TO THE USE OF EMANUEL MALAMUT, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. ERNEST SCHWEHM, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Argued May 24, 1933
Decided October 16, 1933.
For the appellants, Harcourt & Steelman.
For the respondent, Albert G. Abbott and Thomas G. S iddal.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment in this case will be affirmed. Judge Sooy properly inquired as to whether the parties to the agreement of sale had, in fact, subsequent to the execution thereof, modified it to the extent of releasing the vendee from his covenant of assumption of the mortgage covering the lands. Dieckman v. Walser, 114 N. J. Eq. 382, decided at the current (May, 1933) term of this court. The evidence supports the finding of the trial judge.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Ciiiee Justice, Teenghaed, Paekee, Case, Bodine, Hehee, Peeskie, Van BusicieKj Kays, Heteield, Deae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.
For reversal — Hone.