Case Name: Philip O'Connor, Respondent, v. Forty-second Street, Manhattanville and St. Nicholas Avenue Railway Company, Appellant, Impleaded with Others
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1910-09-27
Citations: 199 N.Y. 545
Docket Number: 
Parties: Philip O'Connor, Respondent, v. Forty-second Street, Manhattanville and St. Nicholas Avenue Railway Company, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 199
Pages: 545–545

Head Matter:
Philip O'Connor, Respondent, v. Forty-second Street, Manhattanville and St. Nicholas Avenue Railway Company, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.
O'Connor v. Forty-second St., M. & St. N. Ave. Ry. Co., 131 App. Div. 901, affirmed.
(Argued June 14, 1910;
decided September 27, 1910.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 23, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained through defendant’s negligence.
Bayard II. Ames, John Montgomery and James L. Quackenbush for appellant.
Joseph Fischer and Lords J. Eorhaus for respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed, -with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.