Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles DOGAN, Jr., a/k/a Chuckie Dogan, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-06-26
Citations: 474 F. App'x 276
Docket Number: No. 12-6348
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles DOGAN, Jr., a/k/a Chuckie Dogan, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 474
Pages: 276–277

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles DOGAN, Jr., a/k/a Chuckie Dogan, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-6348.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 21, 2012.
Decided: June 26, 2012.
Charles Dogan, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Monica Kaminksi Schwartz, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, WV, for Appellee.
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Charles Dogan, Jr., appeals the district court's order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying his petition for writ of mandamus. Dogan also appeals the denial of his motion to reconsider the order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dogan v. United States, No. 2:96-cr-00066-1, 2011 WL 6293923 (S.D.W.Va. Dec. 16, 2011) & 2012 WL 256522 (Jan. 27, 2012). We deny Dogan's motion to inspect all recorded statements of court hearings. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.