Case Name: Samie J. LOUIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2017-02-21
Citations: 510 S.W.3d 900
Docket Number: ED 104060
Parties: Samie J. LOUIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before; James M. Dowd, P.J., Kurt S. Odenwald, J., and Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 510
Pages: 900–901

Head Matter:
Samie J. LOUIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
ED 104060
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
Filed: February 21, 2017
Mark A. Grothoff, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Josh Hawley, Robert J. (Jeff) Bartholomew, for respondent.
Before; James M. Dowd, P.J., Kurt S. Odenwald, J., and Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Sarnie J. Louis (Movant) appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of. the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court's denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2015).
. All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. 2015, unless otherwise indicated,