Case Name: JAMES B. BURKE and WILMA BURKE, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. The CITY OF HELENA, a municipal corporation and JACK H. GREER, individually and as Executive Director of the Urban Renewal Department of the City of Helena, Defendants and Respondents
Court: Montana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Montana
Decision Date: 1972-05-17
Citations: 159 Mont. 546
Docket Number: No. 12258
Parties: JAMES B. BURKE and WILMA BURKE, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. The CITY OF HELENA, a municipal corporation and JACK H. GREER, individually and as Executive Director of the Urban Renewal Department of the City of Helena, Defendants and Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Montana Reports
Volume: 159
Pages: 546–547

Head Matter:
JAMES B. BURKE and WILMA BURKE, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. The CITY OF HELENA, a municipal corporation and JACK H. GREER, individually and as Executive Director of the Urban Renewal Department of the City of Helena, Defendants and Respondents.
No. 12258.
Decided May 17, 1972.
497 P.2d 95.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
In this cause a Motion to Dismiss has been filed by defendants and respondents and the same came on for hearing on May 8, 1972, all counsel being present.
Plaintiffs and appellants concede that the motion is well taken for the reason that the appeal was from an order refusing to grant an injunction pendente lite, raising the question whether the refusal to grant the same was in error. The purpose of the requested injunction was to stay the demolition of a building; that since the refusal the building has been demolished and the question involved is thereby rendered moot.
The Court now being advised in the premises it is ordered that the motion to dismiss be, and it hereby is, granted, and this appeal is dismissed.