Case Name: MAX AIZENBERG, Respondent, v. O. F. ANDERSON et al., Appellants
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1915-09-02
Citations: 28 Cal. App. 326
Docket Number: Civ. No. 1561
Parties: MAX AIZENBERG, Respondent, v. O. F. ANDERSON et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports
Volume: 28
Pages: 326–326

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 1561.
First Appellate District.
September 2, 1915.]
MAX AIZENBERG, Respondent, v. O. F. ANDERSON et al., Appellants.
Appeal—Findings—Conflicting Evidence.—The findings of the trial court will not be disturbed on appeal where there is a conflict in the evidence upon which they are based.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. E. P. Mogan, Judge.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Leo Kaufmann, for Appellants.
Edgar C. Levey, and George M. Lipman, for Respondent.

Opinion:
THE COURT.
The only point presented upon this appeal is as to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the findings and judgment of the court. Upon a careful examination of the record we find that there is a substantial conflict in the evidence in respect to those findings of which the appellants complain ; and that this being so, the findings and judgment of the trial court will not be disturbed upon appeal.
The judgment and order are affirmed.