Case Name: Willie DAVIS, Respondent, v. INTERNATIONAL LIGHTING MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Appellant, and Division Of Employment Security, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-11-29
Citations: 179 S.W.3d 306
Docket Number: No. ED 86154
Parties: Willie DAVIS, Respondent, v. INTERNATIONAL LIGHTING MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Appellant, and Division Of Employment Security, Respondent.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 179
Pages: 306–307

Head Matter:
Willie DAVIS, Respondent, v. INTERNATIONAL LIGHTING MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Appellant, and Division Of Employment Security, Respondent.
No. ED 86154.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Nov. 29, 2005.
Brian S. Weinstock, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Willie Davis, St. Louis, MO, Cynthia A. Quetsch, Ninion S. Riley, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
International Lighting Manufacturing Company (hereinafter, "Employer") appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's (hereinafter, "the Commission") decision, affirming the decision by the Appeals Tribunal, awarding Willie Davis (hereinafter, "Employee") unemployment compensation. Employer claims the Appeals Tribunal erred in determining Employee was discharged for something other than misconduct connected to his work.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and no error of law appears. The Commission's decision is affirmed. No precedential or jurisprudential purposes would be served by an opinion restating the detailed facts and the principles of law. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
. The motion taken with the case is denied.