Case Name: Carl DACHTON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1973-12-04
Citations: 287 So. 2d 347
Docket Number: No. 73-342
Parties: Carl DACHTON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ., and SPECTOR, SAM, Associate Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 287
Pages: 347–347

Head Matter:
Carl DACHTON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 73-342.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 4, 1973.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 25, 1974.
Arthur Massey, Miami', for appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.
Before PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ., and SPECTOR, SAM, Associate Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant's first point on appeal questions the sufficiency of the evidence upon which the trial court found him guilty of criminal contempt and sentenced him to sixty days in the county jail. Our review of the record convinces us that the evidence, although conflicting, substantially supports the holding of the trial judge. See State v. Sebastian, Fla. 1965, 171 So.2d 893. Appellant's remaining points appear to be appellate afterthoughts and do not present reversible error upon authority of the rule stated in Silver v. State, Fla. 1966, 188 So.2d 300.
Affirmed.