Case Name: In the Matter of Carl S. Bresnick, Appellant, against Forman Skirt Company, Inc., Defendant, and Samuel Goldin et al., Doing Business as Goldin Bros., et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1954-06-01
Citations: 283 A.D. 1013
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Carl S. Bresnick, Appellant, against Forman Skirt Company, Inc., Defendant, and Samuel Goldin et al., Doing Business as Goldin Bros., et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 283
Pages: 1013–1013

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Carl S. Bresnick, Appellant, against Forman Skirt Company, Inc., Defendant, and Samuel Goldin et al., Doing Business as Goldin Bros., et al., Respondents.

Opinion:
The restrictive provision in paragraph " 6 " of the order was not consented to by petitioner-appellant, and is clearly improper. It should not have been made part of the court's order. Order unanimously modified by striking therefrom paragraph " 6 " and, as so modified, affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Bastow and Botein, JJ.