Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Oliver DOLORES-CRUZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-01-24
Citations: 675 F. App'x 760
Docket Number: No. 15-50354
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Oliver DOLORES-CRUZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: TROTT, TASHIMA, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 675
Pages: 760–760

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Oliver DOLORES-CRUZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-50354
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted January 18, 2017
Filed January 24, 2017
Helen H. Hong, Assistant U.S, Attorney, Office of the US Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Kristin J. Kraus, Esquire, Trial Attorney, Law Office of Kris J. Kraus, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant
Before: TROTT, TASHIMA, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Oliver Dolores-Cruz appeals from the district court's judgment and challenges the 27-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for attempted reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. A review of the record indicates that this appeal is moot because Dolores-Cruz has fully served his custodial sentence and is not subject to a term of supervised release. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 14, 118 S.Ct. 978, 140 L.Ed.2d 43 (1998); United States v. Palomba, 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir. 1999).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.