Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Miguel Angel GARCIA-MARTINEZ, also known as Heraclio Garcia Martinez, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-06-17
Citations: 573 F. App'x 332
Docket Number: No. 13-11065
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Miguel Angel GARCIA-MARTINEZ, also known as Heraclio Garcia Martinez, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING, HAYNES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 573
Pages: 332–333

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Miguel Angel GARCIA-MARTINEZ, also known as Heraclio Garcia Martinez, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-11065
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
June 17, 2014.
James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Jerry Van Beard, Esq., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Dallas, TX, William Ernest Hermesmeyer, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Fort Worth, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before KING, HAYNES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Miguel Angel Garcia-Martinez has moved for leave to withdraw and has • filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Garcia-Martinez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.