Case Name: OFFICE OF INSURANCE REGULATION, Appellant, v. AIU INSURANCE COMPANY, American Home Assurance Company, American International South Insurance Company, et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2006-04-24
Citations: 926 So. 2d 479
Docket Number: No. 1D05-2273
Parties: OFFICE OF INSURANCE REGULATION, Appellant, v. AIU INSURANCE COMPANY, American Home Assurance Company, American International South Insurance Company, et al., Appellees.
Judges: BARFIELD, BROWNING, and THOMAS, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 926
Pages: 479–480

Head Matter:
OFFICE OF INSURANCE REGULATION, Appellant, v. AIU INSURANCE COMPANY, American Home Assurance Company, American International South Insurance Company, et al., Appellees.
No. 1D05-2273.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
April 24, 2006.
S. Marc Herskovitz and Elenita Gomez, Legal Services Division, Office of Insurance Regulation, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Daniel C. Brown, Robert Pass, Kelly A. Cruz-Brown, and Christine R. Dean, of Carlton Fields, P.A., Tallahassee, for ap-pellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The Administrative Law Judge erred in concluding that the appellees had demonstrated standing to challenge proposed rule 690-170.013(7), Fla. Admin. Code. While the interests of the appellees are arguably within the zone of interests to be regulated by the proposed rule, the appel-lees did not demonstrate that application of the proposed rule will result in a real and sufficiently immediate injury in fact to afford them standing to challenge the proposed rule. See Florida Board of Medicine v. Florida Academy of Cosmetic Surgery, Inc., 808 So.2d 243 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). The other issues are mooted by this determination. The final order is REVERSED.
BARFIELD, BROWNING, and THOMAS, JJ., Concur.