Case Name: Carl WATKINS-ISRAYL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-12-18
Citations: 392 S.W.3d 500
Docket Number: No. ED 98233
Parties: Carl WATKINS-ISRAYL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J. and GLENN A. NORTON, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 392
Pages: 500–501

Head Matter:
Carl WATKINS-ISRAYL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 98233.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Dec. 18, 2012.
Andrew E. Zleit, Saint Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Timothy A. Blackwell, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J. and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Carl Watkins-Israyl appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).