Case Name: TELECOMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH AND ACTION CENTER and Media Access Project, Petitioners, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and the United States of America, Respondents, National Association of Broadcasters, Public Broadcasting Service, American Newspaper Publishers Association, Intervenors
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1986-12-16
Citations: 806 F.2d 1115
Docket Number: No. 85-1160
Parties: TELECOMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH AND ACTION CENTER and Media Access Project, Petitioners, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and the United States of America, Respondents, National Association of Broadcasters, Public Broadcasting Service, American Newspaper Publishers Association, In-tervenors.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 806
Pages: 1115–1122

Head Matter:
TELECOMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH AND ACTION CENTER and Media Access Project, Petitioners, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and the United States of America, Respondents, National Association of Broadcasters, Public Broadcasting Service, American Newspaper Publishers Association, In-tervenors.
No. 85-1160.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Dec. 16, 1986.
As Amended Dec. 16, 1986.
Andrew Jay Schwartzman, Henry Geller and Donna Lampert, Washington, D.C., were on petitioners’ suggestion for rehearing en banc.
Before WALD, Chief Judge, ROBINSON, MIKVA, EDWARDS, RUTH BAD-ER GINSBURG, BORK, STARR, SILBER-MAN, BUCKLEY, WILLIAMS, DOUGLAS GINSBURG, Circuit Judges.
Chief Judge WALD and Circuit Judge DOUGLAS GINSBURG did not participate in this order.
Circuit Judges SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON, III, MIKVA, HARRY T. EDWARDS, RUTH BADER GINSBURG and STARR would grant the suggestion for rehearing en banc.
A statement of Circuit Judge MIKVA, joined by Circuit Judge HARRY T. EDWARDS, is attached.
A statement of Circuit Judge STARR, joined by Circuit Judges SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON, III, and RUTH BADER GINSBURG, is attached.
A statement of Circuit Judge BORK is also attached.

Opinion:
ON PETITIONERS' SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Petitioners' suggestion for rehearing en banc has been transmitted to the full Court. The taking of a vote was requested. A majority of the judges of the Court in regular active service have not voted in favor of the suggestion. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the suggestion is denied.