Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Keith RUFFIN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-07-30
Citations: 611 F. App'x 206
Docket Number: No. 13-50944
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Keith RUFFIN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before PRADO, OWEN, and GRAVES, - Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 611
Pages: 206–207

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Keith RUFFIN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-50944
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
July 30, 2015.
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Kimberly S. Keller, Keller Stolarczyk P.L.L.C., Boerne, TX, for Defendant>-Appellant.
Keith Ruffin, Forrest City, AR, pro se.
Before PRADO, OWEN, and GRAVES, - Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Keith Ruffin has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Ruffin has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.