Case Name: Gruelich v. The Hartford
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2003-05-16
Citations: 99 Ohio St. 3d 1415
Docket Number: 2003-0427
Parties: Gruelich v. The Hartford.
Judges: Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 99
Pages: 1415–1415

Head Matter:
[Cite as 05/16/2003 Case Announcements #3, 2003-0hio-2504.]
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS
May 16, 2003
APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
2003-0427.
Gruelich v. The Hartford.

Opinion:
Cuyahoga App. No. 80987, 2003-Ohio-652.
Discretionary appeal denied on Proposition of Law No. I.TL Lundberg Stratton and O'Connor, JJ., dissent, would allow Proposition of Law No. I, and would hold on this proposition of law for the decision in 2003-0302 and 2003-0362, Taylor v. Kemper Ins. Co., Cuyahoga App. No. 81360, 2003-Ohio-177.
Discretionary appeal allowed on Proposition of Law No. II and cause held for the decision in 2002-0579, Burkhart v. CNA Ins. Co., Stark App. No. 2001CA00265, 2002-0hio-903; briefing schedule stayed.
Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.