Case Name: Richard C. BECHERER, et al., Individually and on Behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, J. Don ADAMS, et al., Intervenors-Appellants, v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER and SMITH, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1998-02-12
Citations: 131 F.3d 580
Docket Number: No. 96-1673
Parties: Richard C. BECHERER, et al., Individually and on Behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, J. Don ADAMS, et al., Intervenors-Appellants, v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER and SMITH, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MARTIN, Chief Judge; MERRITT, KENNEDY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, MOORE, COLE, CLAY and GILMAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 131
Pages: 581-593–581-593

Head Matter:
Richard C. BECHERER, et al., Individually and on Behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, J. Don ADAMS, et al., Intervenors-Appellants, v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER and SMITH, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 96-1673.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Feb. 12, 1998.
Before MARTIN, Chief Judge; MERRITT, KENNEDY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, MOORE, COLE, CLAY and GILMAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rules 14 provides as follows:
The effect of the granting rehearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket as a pending appeal.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.
It is further ORDERED that the appellants file a supplemental brief not later than Friday, March 13,1998, and the appellees file a supplemental brief not later than Monday, April 13,1998.
The Clerk will advise the parties once the court has established the date and time of reargument.