Case Name: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. Jerry A. Hurst, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, and United States of America, Party-in-Interest
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-02-28
Citations: 169 F. App'x 165
Docket Number: No. 05-2166
Parties: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. Jerry A. Hurst, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION, Defendant—Appellee, and United States of America, Party-in-Interest.
Judges: Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 169
Pages: 165–166

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. Jerry A. Hurst, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION, Defendant—Appellee, and United States of America, Party-in-Interest.
No. 05-2166.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 23, 2006.
Decided Feb. 28, 2006.
Jerry A. Hurst, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Arthur Umayam, Deneen J. Me-lander, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson, LLP, Washington, DC, for Appellee.
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Jerry A. Hurst appeals from the district court's orders dismissing his complaint as filed beyond the limitations periods and on res judicata grounds, and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hurst v. Northrop Grumman Corp., No. CA-04-1205-1 (E.D. Va. Aug. 17, 2005 & filed Sept. 15, 2005; entered Sept. 16, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED