Case Name: Bobby Lee FLUKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1985-07-30
Citations: 474 So. 2d 334
Docket Number: No. BE-44
Parties: Bobby Lee FLUKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Judges: BOOTH, C.J., and WIGGINTON, J., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 474
Pages: 334–335

Head Matter:
Bobby Lee FLUKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
No. BE-44.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
July 30, 1985.
Rehearing Denied Sept. 11, 1985.
Bobby Lee Fluker, pro se.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

Opinion:
BARFIELD, Judge.
The defendant, Bobby Lee Fluker, filed a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 alleging that at his trial the state knowingly used perjured testimony and that he had ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court denied relief on the grounds that the basis for the motion could have been raised on direct appeal. The trial court erred because both bases can be proper grounds for post-conviction relief; however, the motion is facial ly insufficient for failure to contain a statement of the facts relied upon in support of the motion as required by Rule 3.850(f).
AFFIRMED.
BOOTH, C.J., and WIGGINTON, J., concur.