Case Name: WISE & SCOTT, LLC, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Lee REYNOLDS and Lee Reynolds & Co., PC, Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2014-12-16
Citations: 457 S.W.3d 814
Docket Number: No. ED 100591
Parties: WISE & SCOTT, LLC, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Lee REYNOLDS and Lee Reynolds & Co., PC, Respondents.
Judges: Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 457
Pages: 814–815

Head Matter:
WISE & SCOTT, LLC, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Lee REYNOLDS and Lee Reynolds & Co., PC, Respondents.
No. ED 100591
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Filed: December 16, 2014
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 27, 2015
Application for Transfer Denied March 31, 2015
Bruce C. Cohen, 925 Edna Avenue, Kirkwood, Missouri 63122, for appellant.
Alex M. Kanter, J. Christian Goeke, Co-Counsel, Herzog & Kanter, 7711 Bonhohi-me Avenue, Suite 850, Clayton, Missouri 63105, for respondent.
Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Wise & Scott, LLC (Plaintiff) appeals the trial court's judgment in favor of Lee Reynolds and Lee Reynolds & Co., PC (Defendant) on Plaintiff's petition to recover damages after Defendant withdrew as a member of Plaintiff's accounting firm. Plaintiff claims the trial court erred in determining that it failed to prove its damages pursuant to § 347.121, RSMo of the Missouri Limited Liability Company Act.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and have determined that an extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).