Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Crispin ALVIDREZ, aka Conejo, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-05-12
Citations: 97 F. App'x 135
Docket Number: No. 01-50628; D.C. No. CR-99-00083-DOC-16
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Crispin ALVIDREZ, aka Conejo, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 97
Pages: 135–136

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Crispin ALVIDREZ, aka Conejo, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 01-50628.
D.C. No. CR-99-00083-DOC-16.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 10, 2004.
Decided May 12, 2004.
Miriam A. Krinsky, Asst. U.S. Atty., Susan L. Barna, Asst. U.S. Atty., Robert Edward Dugdale, USLA — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Richard D. Rome, Law Offices of Richard D. Rome, Van Nuys, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before CANBY, KOZINSKI and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Crispin Alvidrez appeals his conviction pursuant to a guilty plea to RICO conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we vacate and remand.
Counsel for Alvidrez and the government agree that this case should be vacated and remanded to allow Alvidrez to bring a motion to withdraw his guilty plea with the assistance of new counsel. We therefore vacate the conviction and remand the case to the district court for this purpose.
The Court has received and reviewed Alvidrez's pro se supplemental brief. In light of the disposition in this case, we decline to reach the contentions raised in his brief.
VACATED and REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.