Case Name: Thomaston Special Products, Inc., Successor-in-Interest to Precision Products Industries, Inc.
Court: United States Court of Claims
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1975-03-14
Citations: 206 Ct. Cl. 869
Docket Number: No. 121-72
Parties: Thomaston Special Products, Inc., Successor-in-Interest to Precision Products Industries, Inc.
Judges: Before davis, Judge, Presiding, skeltoN and kashiwa, Judges.
Reporter: United States Court of Claims Reports
Volume: 206
Pages: 869–870

Head Matter:
No. 121-72.
March 14, 1975
Thomaston Special Products, Inc., Successor-in-Interest to Precision Products Industries, Inc.

Opinion:
Pleading and practice; stipulation of facts; acceptance of by court. — On March 14,1975 the court issued the following order:
Before davis, Judge, Presiding, skeltoN and kashiwa, Judges.
"This case comes before the court on the merits on the parties' stipulation of facts, having been submitted on the briefs and oral argument of counsel. Upon consideration thereof, the court does not feel that it can properly dispose of this case on the unelaborated and incomplete stipulation presented by the parties and therefore is unwilling to be bound by it. See Swift & Co. v. Hocking Valley Ry., 243 U.S. 281, 289 (1917); Kaminer Constr. Corp. v. United States, 203 Ct. Cl. 182, 197, 198, 488 F. 2d 980, 988, 989 (1973). The case should be tried so that all relevant facts are placed in the record and the full circumstances exposed.
"it is THEREFOR® ORDERED that this case be and it is returned to the trial division for trial."
Plaintiff's motion for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en bane was denied April 25,1975.