Case Name: Lawrence WILDER, Sr., Appellant v. WARSHAW ONE, LLC, As Owed by, et al., Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-04-16
Citations: 372 F. App'x 96
Docket Number: No. 10-7004
Parties: Lawrence WILDER, Sr., Appellant v. WARSHAW ONE, LLC, As Owed by, et al., Appellees.
Judges: BEFORE: SENTELLE, Chief Judge, and GINSBURG and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 372
Pages: 96–96

Head Matter:
Lawrence WILDER, Sr., Appellant v. WARSHAW ONE, LLC, As Owed by, et al., Appellees.
No. 10-7004.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
April 16, 2010.
Lawrence Wilder, Sr., Windsor Mill, MD, pro se.
BEFORE: SENTELLE, Chief Judge, and GINSBURG and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by the appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 340. It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's order issued December 30, 2009, be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed the appellant's complaint as frivolous. The complaint contains factual allegations that are so implausible as to be "fantastic or delusional." See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 328, 109 S.Ct. 1827, 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989).
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.