Case Name: John P. GORDON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-10-16
Citations: 828 So. 2d 443
Docket Number: No. 2D01-3406
Parties: John P. GORDON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ALTENBERND, WHATLEY, and NORTHCUTT, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 828
Pages: 443–444

Head Matter:
John P. GORDON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D01-3406.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Oct. 16, 2002.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
John P. Gordon challenges the trial court's order summarily denying his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm.
In his motion, Gordon alleged that his plea was involuntary because defense counsel affirmatively misadvised him regarding the future sentencing-enhancing effects of the plea in regard to an as yet uncommitted crime. In Stansel v. State, 825 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), we held that this claim is not cognizable in a rule 3.850 motion. We certify the same question that we certified in Stansel. We affirm, without discussion, any other issues raised by Gordon in his motion.
ALTENBERND, WHATLEY, and NORTHCUTT, JJ., concur.