Case Name: Jose Deleon, Respondent, v. Keystone Freight Corp. et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2013-03-19
Citations: 104 A.D.3d 541
Docket Number: 
Parties: Jose Deleon, Respondent, v Keystone Freight Corp. et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 104
Pages: 541–542

Head Matter:
Jose Deleon, Respondent, v Keystone Freight Corp. et al., Appellants.
[961 NYS2d 404]

Opinion:
Appeal from order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mary Ann Brigantti-Hughes, J.), entered July 15, 2011, which, in this action for personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident, denied defendants' motion for a new trial on the issue of past lost earnings pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a), deemed appeal from judgment, same court and Justice, entered August 9, 2011, awarding plaintiff, inter alia, $174,000.68 for past lost earnings from the date of the injury to the date of the verdict (CPLR 5520 [c]), and, so considered, the judgment is unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff sustained his burden of establishing the amount of his past lost earnings with reasonable certainty through the uncontroverted testimony of his economist (see Papa v City of New York, 194 AD2d 527, 531 [2d Dept 1993], lv dismissed 82 NY2d 918 [1994]). Plaintiff also tendered sufficient medical testimony connecting his injuries to his inability to work for the entire period from the date of the accident to the date of the verdict (cf. Razzaque v Krakow Taxi, 238 AD2d 161, 162 [1st Dept 1997]). The amount of damages is primarily a question for the jury, which was entitled to credit the testimony of plaintiffs treating physicians regarding plaintiffs physical condition and his ability to work, and to discredit the testimony of defendants' witnesses regarding that issue (see Balsam v City of New York, 298 AD2d 479 [2d Dept 2002]). Concur — Andrias, J.E, Friedman, DeGrasse, Freedman and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.