Case Name: In the Matter of James P. McCall et al., Appellants, v. Betty Matondo et al., Respondents, et al., Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2002-08-28
Citations: 297 A.D.2d 397
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of James P. McCall et al., Appellants, v Betty Matondo et al., Respondents, et al., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 297
Pages: 397–397

Head Matter:
In the Matter of James P. McCall et al., Appellants, v Betty Matondo et al., Respondents, et al., Respondent.
[746 NYS2d 619]

Opinion:
The Supreme Court correctly found that the proceeding was untimely (see Election Law § 16-102 [2]).
The appellants' remaining contentions are without merit. Prudenti, P.J., Florio, McGinity, Crane and Cozier, JJ., concur.