Case Name: The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. William MANGHAM, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-04-11
Citations: 541 So. 2d 166
Docket Number: No. 88-2105
Parties: The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. William MANGHAM, Appellee.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, FERGUSON and COPE, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 541
Pages: 166–167

Head Matter:
The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. William MANGHAM, Appellee.
No. 88-2105.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 11, 1989.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Susan Odzer Hugentugler, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Howard K. Blumberg, Asst. Public Defender, for appellee.
Before BARKDULL, FERGUSON and COPE, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellee concedes that the sentence must be reversed because the trial court failed to give written reasons to support a downward departure from the sentencing guidelines. See State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985); State v. Dixon, 539 So.2d 38 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); State v. Vickery, 536 So.2d 380 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); State v. Martinez, 534 So.2d 1248 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); State v. Wayda, 533 So.2d 939 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); State v. Adams, 528 So.2d 548 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).
The sentence is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.