Case Name: Darryl D. ATKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-06-24
Citations: 108 S.W.3d 194
Docket Number: No. WD 61078
Parties: Darryl D. ATKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before HOWARD, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and HARDWICK, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 108
Pages: 194–195

Head Matter:
Darryl D. ATKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 61078.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
June 24, 2003.
Andrew A. Schroeder, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Chamette D. Douglass, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before HOWARD, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and HARDWICK, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Darryl D. Atkins appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. In his sole point on appeal, Atkins alleges the motion court clearly erred in denying his Rule 24.035 motion because he was denied effective assistance of counsel in that counsel misled him into pleading guilty. As a result, Atkins argues his guilty pleas were not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary.
Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).