Case Name: Daugherty et al. v. Daugherty et al., Appellant
Court: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1925-04-28
Citations: 85 Pa. Super. 421
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 2
Parties: Daugherty et al. v. Daugherty et al., Appellant.
Judges: Before Henderson, Trexler, Keller, Linn and Gawthrop, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania Superior Court Reports
Volume: 85
Pages: 421–422

Head Matter:
Daugherty et al. v. Daugherty et al., Appellant.
Argued April 17, 1925.
Before Henderson, Trexler, Keller, Linn and Gawthrop, JJ.
April 28, 1925:
Raymond E. Brown, of Brown & Means, and with him W. L. McCracken, for appellants.
W. N. Conrad, for appellees.

Opinion:
Per Curiam,
The record shows such material departure from equity Rules, 68 etc., that we are constrained at once to remit the record for reconsideration and disposition in accordance with those rules. The decree entered by the lower court cannot be considered as final. A decree nisi should have first been entered.
Decree reversed and record remitted with a procedendo. Costs of this appeal to abide final determination of the casa