Case Name: William E. KLEINSCHMIDT, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY INSURANCE CO., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-05-12
Citations: 599 So. 2d 208
Docket Number: No. 91-1265
Parties: William E. KLEINSCHMIDT, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY INSURANCE CO., Appellee.
Judges: Before HUBBART, BASKIN and COPE, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 599
Pages: 208–209

Head Matter:
William E. KLEINSCHMIDT, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY INSURANCE CO., Appellee.
No. 91-1265.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 12, 1992.
Rehearing Denied June 23, 1992.
William E. Kleinschmidt, in pro. per.
Stephens, Lynn, Klein & McNicholas, Philip D. Parrish, and Marlene S. Reiss, Miami, for appellee.
Before HUBBART, BASKIN and COPE, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
William E. Kleinschmidt appeals an order dismissing his complaint against defendant-appellee United States Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Co. for failure to serve defendant within the time provided by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.070(j). The trial court took testimony and found that while the plaintiff-appellant has certain physical infirmities, they did not constitute disability of the magnitude necessary to constitute good cause for failure to effect service for a period of 22 months. See A & W Electric of Miami, Inc. v. Abraira, 567 So.2d 36 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Schlakman v. Helliwell, Melrose & DeWolf 519 So.2d 14, 15 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). We see no basis on which to disturb the trial court's ruling on that point, or on the other issues raised by appellant.
Affirmed.