Case Name: RUDOLPH v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1927-01-19
Citations: 298 S.W. 434
Docket Number: No. 10641
Parties: RUDOLPH v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 298
Pages: 434–435

Head Matter:
RUDOLPH v. STATE.
(No. 10641.)
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Jan. 19, 1927.
Rehearing Denied Oct. 19, 1927.
Lee J. Marks and Wm. Leo Sparks, both of Amarillo, for appellant.
Sam D. Stinson, State’s Atty., and Robt.M. Lyles, Asst. State’s Atty., both of Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
BETHEA, J.
The appellant was convicted in the district court of Potter county for the offense of embezzlement and his punishment assessed at confinement In the penitentiary for a term of two years.
The notice of appeal was given on the 4th day of June, 1926, and the statement of facts was filed on the 12th day of November, 1926, or more than 90 days after the notice of appeal was given. The bills of exceptions herein were filed December 4, 1926, more than 90 days after the notice of appeal was given in this ease. We have -repeatedly held that a statement of facts and bills of exceptions filed more than 90 days after the notice of appfeal is given cannot be considered by this court. In this ruling, we are following the plain terms of the statutes. Section 5, art. 760, 1925 Revision O. C. P.
In the absence of the statement of facts and bills of exceptions, there is no error manifested by this record, and the judgment is in all things affirmed.
PER GURIAM. The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.