Case Name: WALTER MILOS, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. EXXON COMPANY, USA RESPONDENT-APPELLANT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1996-02-22
Citations: 143 N.J. 333
Docket Number: 
Parties: WALTER MILOS, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. EXXON COMPANY, USA RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 143
Pages: 333–333

Head Matter:
671 A.2d 120
WALTER MILOS, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. EXXON COMPANY, USA RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Argued January 29, 1996
Decided February 22, 1996.
Richard V. Jones argued the cause for appellant (Bressler, Amery & Ross, attorneys).
Jerry M. Finn argued the cause for respondent {Schneider, Goldberger, Cohen, Finn, Solomon, Leder & Montalbano, attorneys).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Rodriguez of the Appellate Division, reported at 281 N.J.Super. 194, 656 A.2d 1300 (1995).
For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, STEIN and COLEMAN — 6.
Opposed — none.