Case Name: MAX FRANK, Appellant, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1908-12-21
Citations: 154 Cal. 730
Docket Number: Sac. No. 1573
Parties: MAX FRANK, Appellant, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent.
Judges: Angellotti, J., Shaw, J., Lorigan, J., Henshaw, J., and Melvin, J., concurred.
Reporter: California Reports
Volume: 154
Pages: 730–730

Head Matter:
[Sac. No. 1573.
In Bank.
December 21, 1908.]
MAX FRANK, Appellant, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent.
Montgomery Avenue Bonds — Case Affirmed, — Judgment affirmed on the authority of Union Trust Company v. State of California, ante, p. 716.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County. J. W. Hughes, Judge.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
J. M. Rothehild, and S. W. & E. B. ITolladay, for Appellant.
U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, and George R. Sturtevant, Assistant Attorney-General, for Respondent.

Opinion:
SLOSS, J.
The plaintiff, as holder of sixty-five Montgomery Avenue bonds and 2,975 coupons, sues to recover the amount of said bonds and coupons from the state of California. Judgment was entered in favor of the defendant upon the sustaining of its demurrer to the complaint.
The complaint is in all substantial particulars identical with that in Union Trust Company of San Francisco against the State of California, Sacramento No. 1570, ante p. 716, [99 Pac. 183], decided this day, and for the reasons stated -in the •opinion in that ease it must be held that the complaint fails to state a cause of action.
The judgment is affirmed.
Angellotti, J., Shaw, J., Lorigan, J., Henshaw, J., and Melvin, J., concurred.