Case Name: FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent v. Joseph A. DeMUZIO, Jr., Petitioner
Court: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2010-12-29
Citations: 10 A.3d 901
Docket Number: 
Parties: FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent v. Joseph A. DeMUZIO, Jr., Petitioner.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 10
Pages: 901–902

Head Matter:
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent v. Joseph A. DeMUZIO, Jr., Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Dec. 29, 2010.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 29th day of December, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:
Whether the Superior Court erred in affirming the trial court's determination that Petitioner's counterclaim for breach of contract did not arise from the same transaction that gave rise to Respondent's claim for mortgage foreclosure and that Petitioner lacked standing to assert the counterclaim?