Case Name: Michael W. CHAMBERLAIN, Claimant/Respondent, v. REGAL RIVERFRONT HOTEL, Employer/Respondent, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri, as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Additional Party/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-03-26
Citations: 71 S.W.3d 247
Docket Number: No. ED 79725
Parties: Michael W. CHAMBERLAIN, Claimant/Respondent, v. REGAL RIVERFRONT HOTEL, Employer/Respondent, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri, as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Additional Party/Appellant.
Judges: Before GEORGE W. DRAPER III, P.J., MARY R. RUSSELL, J., and MARY K. HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 71
Pages: 247–248

Head Matter:
Michael W. CHAMBERLAIN, Claimant/Respondent, v. REGAL RIVERFRONT HOTEL, Employer/Respondent, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri, as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Additional Party/Appellant.
No. ED 79725.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
March 26, 2002.
Ellen L. Harmon, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Harry J. Nichols, St. Louis, for Chamberlain.
Mark Cordes, St. Louis, MO, for Regal Riverfront.
Before GEORGE W. DRAPER III, P.J., MARY R. RUSSELL, J., and MARY K. HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The Treasurer of the State of Missouri, as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund ("Fund"), appeals from the judgment of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission ("Commission") awarding Michael W. Chamberlain ("Claimant") permanent total disability benefits against the Fund and holding the Regal Riverfront Hotel ("Employer") hable for permanent partial disability benefits and specific past and future medical expenses. The Fund claims that the Commission erred in hold ing the Fund, and not the Employer, liable for Claimant's permanent total disability benefits. We find no error and affirm.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).