Case Name: McGRAW v. McGRAW
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1960-02-17
Citations: 220 Or. 319
Docket Number: 
Parties: McGRAW v. McGRAW
Judges: Before McAllister, Chief Justice, and Rossman, O’Connell and Harris, Justices.
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 220
Pages: 319–320

Head Matter:
Argued February 5,
affirmed February 17, 1960
McGRAW v. McGRAW
349 P. 2d 463
Wm. D. Miller, Salem, argued the cause and submitted a brief for appellant.
Kenneth E. Shetterly, Dallas, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Hay ter and Shetterly, Dallas.
Before McAllister, Chief Justice, and Rossman, O’Connell and Harris, Justices.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is a suit for divorce brought by Carmen G. McGraw, as plaintiff, against her husband, Elmer E. McGraw, who filed a cross-complaint also praying for divorce. Both, parties sought custody of their minor child, Kenneth, now four years of age.
The decree of the trial court granted the defendant husband a divorce and custody of the child with the proviso that until the further order of the court, the child should reside in the home of defendant's aunt The plaintiff has appealed.
We have read the record with care and believe the decree should be affirmed and it is so ordered. Neither party shall recover costs in this court.