Case Name: Michael Fitzgerald LEE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1988-01-19
Citations: 518 So. 2d 963
Docket Number: No. 85-2612
Parties: Michael Fitzgerald LEE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 518
Pages: 963–963

Head Matter:
Michael Fitzgerald LEE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 85-2612.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan. 19, 1988.
H.T. Smith, Miami, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Ivy R. Ginsberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.
Before BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We relinquished jurisdiction to the trial court, and, pursuant to our directions, a de novo hearing on the defendant's motion to suppress was conducted. See Lee v. State, 499 So.2d 66 (Fla.3d DCA 1987). The trial court again denied the motion to suppress, and we affirm. Roman v. State, 475 So.2d 1228 (Fla.1985); Kee v. State, 504 So.2d 1365 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Williams v. State, 403 So.2d 453 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); James v. State, 223 So.2d 52 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969).
Affirmed.