Case Name: ROBERTSON et al. v. GONZALES et ux.
Court: Texas Courts of Civil Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1926-10-14
Citations: 288 S.W. 254
Docket Number: No. 401
Parties: ROBERTSON et al. v. GONZALES et ux.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 288
Pages: 254–254

Head Matter:
ROBERTSON et al. v. GONZALES et ux.
(No. 401.)
(Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Waco.
Oct. 14, 1926.
Rehearing Denied Nov. 11, 1926.)
Warren & Russell, of Cleburne, for appellants.
Jackson & Jackson, of Cleburne, for appel-lees.

Opinion:
BARCUS, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment, rendered for appellees on an instructed verdict by the trial court. There are no assignments of error contained in appellants' brief. We can therefore consider only fundamental error. Paris v. Estes (Tex. Civ. App.) 283 S. W. 529. There is no fundamental error apparent of record which would authorize this court to reverse the judgment of the trial court.
Appellants present only two propositions in their brief, and neither of them is supported by any assignment of error copied in the brief. We have, however, examined each of said propositions and do not think they show any reversible error.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.