Case Name: Curtis L. KING, Petitioner-Appellant, v. SC DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-04-21
Citations: 600 F. App'x 131
Docket Number: No. 15-6058
Parties: Curtis L. KING, Petitioner-Appellant, v. SC DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 600
Pages: 131–131

Head Matter:
Curtis L. KING, Petitioner-Appellant, v. SC DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 15-6058.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 16, 2015.
Decided: April 21, 2015.
Curtis L. King, Appellant Pro Se.
Before AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Curtis L. King appeals the district court's order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice his petition for a writ of mandamus. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 84(b). Because King does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition in his informal brief, he has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.