Case Name: Michael LYNCH, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRENDWEST RESORTS, INC., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-06-16
Citations: 184 F. App'x 667
Docket Number: No. 04-35467
Parties: Michael LYNCH, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRENDWEST RESORTS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before: BEEZER, TALLMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 184
Pages: 667–667

Head Matter:
Michael LYNCH, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRENDWEST RESORTS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 04-35467.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted June 9, 2006.
Filed June 16, 2006.
David L. Garrison, Esq., Garrison & Associates, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
C. Dennis Loomis, Esq., Jenkens & Cilcrest, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Thomas R. Merrick, Esq., Matthew Sekits, Esq., Bullivant Houser Bailey, PC, Seattle, WA, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before: BEEZER, TALLMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Appellant Michael Lynch appeals the district court's denial of his motion for relief from judgment and a new trial under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 60(b)(2), (3) and (6), as well as the district court's denial of his motion for reconsideration. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm. The parties are familiar with the facts and procedural history.
The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the Rule 60(b)(3) motion when it found that the additional evidence proffered was insufficient to reopen the judgment. The law of the case governs the indirect damages claim and we see no reason to disturb it. See Lynch v. Trendwest Resorts Inc., 64 Fed.Appx. 44 (9th Cir .2003).
The claims under Rules 60(b)(2) and (6) were waived because they were not argued in the opening brief.
Each party shall bear its own costs on appeal.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.