Case Name: U.S. 1 OFFICE CORPORATION, INC., and U.S. 1 Investors, Ltd., Appellants, v. L.J. HOOKER INTERNATIONAL FLORIDA, INC., and Maurice Galina, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1994-03-08
Citations: 632 So. 2d 722
Docket Number: No. 93-1548
Parties: U.S. 1 OFFICE CORPORATION, INC., and U.S. 1 Investors, Ltd., Appellants, v. L.J. HOOKER INTERNATIONAL FLORIDA, INC., and Maurice Galina, Appellees.
Judges: Before BASKIN, COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 632
Pages: 722–723

Head Matter:
U.S. 1 OFFICE CORPORATION, INC., and U.S. 1 Investors, Ltd., Appellants, v. L.J. HOOKER INTERNATIONAL FLORIDA, INC., and Maurice Galina, Appellees.
No. 93-1548.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 8, 1994.
Shubin & Bellas and John K. Shubin, Miami, for appellants.
Paul M. Bunge, Arthur Halsey Rice, Miami, for appellees.
Before BASKIN, COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Gibson v. Courtois, 539 So.2d 459 (Fla.1989); Goff v. Indian Lake Estates, Inc., 178 So.2d 910 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965). Compare generally Nguyen v. Roth Realty, Inc., 550 So.2d 490, 491 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989) (real estate sales contract provides for expiration of contract and payment of commission beyond expiration date).