Case Name: Fredrick BOYD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2001-05-09
Citations: 785 So. 2d 670
Docket Number: No. 4D00-105
Parties: Fredrick BOYD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: DELL, GUNTHER, and KLEIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 785
Pages: 670–671

Head Matter:
Fredrick BOYD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D00-105.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
May 9, 2001.
Rehearing Denied June 15, 2001.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and David McPherrin, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas J. Glaid, Assistant Attorney General, Fort Lauder-dale, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant Fredrick Boyd challenges his convictions and sentences for resisting an officer with violence and for loitering or prowling. Appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error in six of the seven points he has raised on appeal. As to the seventh point, appellant correctly contends, and the state concedes, that the written judgment erroneously states that he pled guilty when in fact, he was convicted by the verdict of a jury. Additionally, we note that the trial court sentenced appellant as a habitual offender, but the written judgment neglected to include a notation to that effect. We affirm the conviction and the sentence, but remand for correction of the clerical errors in the written judgment.
DELL, GUNTHER, and KLEIN, JJ., concur.