Case Name: Steven M. Marlowe, an Infant, by His Parent and Natural Guardian, Steven L. Marlowe, et al., Appellants, v. Rush-Henrietta Central School District et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1991-11-21
Citations: 78 N.Y.2d 1096
Docket Number: 
Parties: Steven M. Marlowe, an Infant, by His Parent and Natural Guardian, Steven L. Marlowe, et al., Appellants, v Rush-Henrietta Central School District et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 78
Pages: 1096–1097

Head Matter:
Steven M. Marlowe, an Infant, by His Parent and Natural Guardian, Steven L. Marlowe, et al., Appellants, v Rush-Henrietta Central School District et al., Respondents.
Argued October 8, 1991;
decided November 21, 1991
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
George A. Schell for appellants.
James E. Maslyn for Rush-Henrietta Central School District, respondent.
David F. Bowen, Robert M. Shaddock and Roger G. Preston, Jr., for Derrick Nesmith, respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (167 AD2d 820).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa. Judge Alexander dissents and votes to reverse for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum at the Appellate Division (167 AD2d 820, 820-822).