Case Name: William Kramm, Respondent, v. Harriet G. Holloway, Appellant, Impleaded with Anna Globes and Others, Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1932-12
Citations: 237 A.D. 840
Docket Number: 
Parties: William Kramm, Respondent, v. Harriet G. Holloway, Appellant, Impleaded with Anna Globes and Others, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 237
Pages: 840–840

Head Matter:
William Kramm, Respondent, v. Harriet G. Holloway, Appellant, Impleaded with Anna Globes and Others, Respondents.

Opinion:
Order denying defendant Holloway's motion to vacate the stay in the order to show cause of December 9, 1931, reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The stay was granted in violation of section 882 of the Civil Practice Act in that there was no notice given (Stuhmer & Company v. Korman, 235 App. Div. 856) and also in violation of section 819 of the Civil Practice Act. There is nothing herein that estops the appellant from raising the question at this time. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.