Case Name: Roudebush et al., respondents, v. Ray et al., appellants
Court: Montana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Montana
Decision Date: 1878-01
Citations: 3 Mont. 188
Docket Number: 
Parties: Roudebush et al., respondents, v. Ray et al., appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Montana Reports
Volume: 3
Pages: 188–188

Head Matter:
Roudebush et al., respondents, v. Ray et al., appellants.
The only question raised in this case is fully considered in the case of Hig-ley v. Gilmer dal., decided at this term. See ante, page 90.
Appeal from Third District, Lewis and Clarice County.
OhuMaseko & Chadwick, for appellants.
Shober & Lowry, for respondents.
The briefs on both sides refer to authorities cited in the case of Higl'ey v. Gilmer et al., which see ante, page 90.

Opinion:
Knowles, J.
The judgment in this case was rendered at an adjourned term of court. During the interval of adjournment a term of court was held in the same district in another county by the same judge. The only error assigned is, that this judgment was void because the term of court for Lewis and Clarke county terminated at the commencement of the term in Meagher county, and hence was riot rendered in term time. This point has been considered in the case of Higley v. Gilmer et al., at this term, and it was therein determined that such judgment was rendered in term time and valid.
The judgment of the court below is affirmed with costs.
Judgment affirmed.