Case Name: BRIGHTON CONSTRUCTION, INC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. L & J ENTERPRISES, INC., DEFENDANT AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BENJ. GRUNAUER COMPANY, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1974-01-04
Citations: 126 N.J. Super. 186
Docket Number: 
Parties: BRIGHTON CONSTRUCTION, INC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. L & J ENTERPRISES, INC., DEFENDANT AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BENJ. GRUNAUER COMPANY, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 126
Pages: 186–186

Head Matter:
BRIGHTON CONSTRUCTION, INC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. L & J ENTERPRISES, INC., DEFENDANT AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BENJ. GRUNAUER COMPANY, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued November 19, 1973
Decided January 4, 1974.
Before Judges Lynch, Mehler and Michels.
Mr. Richard K. Rosenberg argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Heller & Laiks, attorneys; Mr. Richard K. Rosenberg, of counsel, and Mr. Herbert R. Ezor, on the brief).
Mr. Robert B. Hermes argued the cause for appellant (Hermes & Gitlin, attorneys; Mr. Robert B. Hermes of counsel and on the brief).
Mr. Milton C. Yarrow argued the cause for third-party defendant-respondent.
Before Judges Lynch, Mehler and Michels.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment of the Chancery Division is affirmed essentially for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Kole.