Case Name: C. M. Cravatt, Plaintiff in Error, v. W. H. Pierson, Defendant in Error
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1927-04-20
Citations: 93 Fla. 935
Docket Number: 
Parties: C. M. Cravatt, Plaintiff in Error, v. W. H. Pierson, Defendant in Error.
Judges: 
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 93
Pages: 935–935

Head Matter:
C. M. Cravatt, Plaintiff in Error, v. W. H. Pierson, Defendant in Error.
En Banc.
Decision Filed April 20, 1927.
Petition for Rehearing denied June 4, 1927.
Bart A. Riley, for Plaintiff in Error;
McCaskill, Taylor & McCaslcill, for Defendant in Error.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
In this case the Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Whitfield and Mr. Justice Buford are of the opinion that the judgment rendered by the trial court to which the writ of error is addressed should be reversed while Mr. Justice Terrell, Mr. Justice Strum and Mr. Justice Brown are of the opinion that said judgment should be affirmed; and there being no prospect of a change of judicial opinion the judgment will be affirmed on the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 South Rep. 51; Pensacola Electric Co. v. Humphreys, 61 Fla. 389, 54 South. Rep. 452; Quigg, Chief of Police v. Radel, 86 Fla. 197, 97 South. Rep. 380, and State ex rel. Amos v. Hamwey, 87 Fla. 55, 100 South. Rep. 796. Yarnell v. Gregory, 88 Fla. 91, Broaddus v. Theurer, 92 Fla. —.
An order will be entered affirming the judgment herein.
All concur.