Case Name: David Sandman, Resp't, v. Horace Seaman, et al., App'lts
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1895-02-11
Citations: 65 N.Y. St. Rep. 602
Docket Number: 
Parties: David Sandman, Resp’t, v. Horace Seaman, et al., App’lts.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 65
Pages: 602–604

Head Matter:
David Sandman, Resp’t, v. Horace Seaman, et al., App’lts.
(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department,
Filed February 11, 1895.)
Fraudulent conveyance—Inference.
A fraudulent intent may be inferred, upon a conveyance by a husband to his wife, from the inadequacy of the consideration, where he was indebted at the time and thereby deprives himself of all power to pay the obligation.
Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff.
J. J. Bennett, for app’lt; John S. Griffith, for resp’t.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed, on the opinion of the court at special term.'