Case Name: ROBERT STUPIN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PRIMITIVO SANCHEZ, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND BOARD, RESPONDENT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1971-09-27
Citations: 59 N.J. 240
Docket Number: 
Parties: ROBERT STUPIN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PRIMITIVO SANCHEZ, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND BOARD, RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 59
Pages: 240–240

Head Matter:
ROBERT STUPIN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PRIMITIVO SANCHEZ, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND BOARD, RESPONDENT.
Argued September 13, 1971
Decided September 27, 1971.
Mr. Stephen Mongiello■ argued the cause for appellant.
Mr. Martin L. Sisselman argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. James <& Addas, attorneys).

Opinion:
Pee Curiam.
The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Halpern (113 N. J. Super. 84).
For affirmmce—Chief Justice Weinteaub and Justices Jacobs, Eeancis, Peoctoe, Schettino and Mountain—6.
For reversal—None.