Case Name: Pearl Eisele et al., appellees, v. L. A. Meeker et al., appellants
Court: Nebraska Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Nebraska
Decision Date: 1921-02-23
Citations: 105 Neb. 687
Docket Number: No. 21251
Parties: Pearl Eisele et al., appellees, v. L. A. Meeker et al., appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Nebraska Reports
Volume: 105
Pages: 687–687

Head Matter:
Pearl Eisele et al., appellees, v. L. A. Meeker et al., appellants.
Filed February 23, 1921.
No. 21251.
Appeal. In the absence of a bill of exceptions, when the sufficiency of tbe pleadings is not questioned, tbe judgment of tbe trial court will be affirmed.
Appeal from the district court for Douglas county: William A. Redick, Judge.
Affirmed.
Charles W. Haller, for appellants.
R. J. Hadden and W. W. Hoye, contra.

Opinion:
Morrissey, C. J.
Plaintiffs brought this action to recover for damages to plaintiffs' automobile caused by the negligent driving of a team and wagon owned by defendant Meeker. A jury was waived and the cause submitted to the court on a stipulation of facts. The court entered judgment in favor of plaintiffs and against defendant Harney Street Stables, a partnership, and defendants Meeker and Davis, and dismissed the cause of action against defendants Jackson. Defendants Harney Street Stables and Meeker have ap-. pealed.
A purported stipulation of facts is set out in appellants' brief, but is not incorporated in a bill of exceptions, and, no such bill has been filed. The sufficiency of the pleadings is not questioned, and it follows that the judgment must be affirmed. A consideration of the stipulation set out in the brief would not, however, result in a 'reversal.,
Affirmed.