Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Roy Eugene HARRIS, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-12-05
Citations: 207 S.W.3d 694
Docket Number: No. WD 66156
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Roy Eugene HARRIS, Appellant.
Judges: Before HOWARD, C.J., and ELLIS and SMITH, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 207
Pages: 694–694

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Roy Eugene HARRIS, Appellant.
No. WD 66156.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Dec. 5, 2006.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Stephanie Morrell, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Rosemary E. Percival, Assistant Public Defender, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
Before HOWARD, C.J., and ELLIS and SMITH, JJ.

Opinion:
Order
PER CURIAM.
Roy Harris appeals the trial court's entry of a sentence and judgment claiming that the State failed to prove him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of two forgery charges. We find that there is sufficient evidence from which a reasonable juror might have found Harris guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
The trial court's entry of judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).