Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Kenneth M. BUCKHOLZ, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2016-12-13
Citations: 505 S.W.3d 433
Docket Number: WD 79334
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Kenneth M. BUCKHOLZ, Appellant.
Judges: Before Division One: Anthony Rex Gabbert, P.J., Thomas H. Newton, and Alok Ahuja,
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 505
Pages: 433–434

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Kenneth M. BUCKHOLZ, Appellant.
WD 79334
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
ORDER FILED: December 13, 2016
Dora Fichter, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent
Kenneth M. Buckholz, Appellant Pro Se
Before Division One: Anthony Rex Gabbert, P.J., Thomas H. Newton, and Alok Ahuja,

Opinion:
ORDER
Per Curiam:
Kenneth Buckholz ("Buckholz") appeals the trial court's decision to deny his 29.07(d) motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Buckholz argues that the trial court erred in denying his 29.07(d) motion because the plea was entered unknowingly and involuntarily in that the plea trial court breached the plea agreement by never stating whether it would or would not accept the agreement, but instead sentenced the appellant to more time than was agreed to by Buckholz and the State. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).