Case Name: Julian Edward ROCHESTER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; State of South Carolina, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-06-19
Citations: 229 F. App'x 270
Docket Number: No. 07-6195
Parties: Julian Edward ROCHESTER, Petitioner—Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; State of South Carolina, Respondents—Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 229
Pages: 270–271

Head Matter:
Julian Edward ROCHESTER, Petitioner—Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; State of South Carolina, Respondents—Appellees.
No. 07-6195.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 30, 2007.
Decided: June 19, 2007.
Julian Edward Rochester, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Julian Edward Rochester appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying his petition for a writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Rochester v. South Carolina Dept of Corr., No. 2:06-cv-03085-HMH (D.S.C. Dec. 1, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.