Case Name: Herman GOLD, Petitioner, v. DINKLER MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, Consolidated Mutual Insurance Company and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1966-04-27
Citations: 185 So. 2d 700
Docket Number: No. 35003
Parties: Herman GOLD, Petitioner, v. DINKLER MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, Consolidated Mutual Insurance Company and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
Judges: THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 185
Pages: 700–700

Head Matter:
Herman GOLD, Petitioner, v. DINKLER MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, Consolidated Mutual Insurance Company and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
No. 35003.
Supreme Court of Florida.
April 27, 1966.
Samuel I. Leff, of Leff & Pesetsky, North Miami Beach, for petitioner.
Howard N. Pelzner, Miami, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date November 17, 1965.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
The petition for attorney's fees is denied.
THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and ERVIN, JJ., concur.