Case Name: DALMAZZO v. DRYSDALE et al.
Court: Supreme Court of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1889-05-15
Citations: 3 Cal. Unrep. 84
Docket Number: No. 12,956
Parties: DALMAZZO v. DRYSDALE et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Unreported Cases
Volume: 3
Pages: 84–85

Head Matter:
DALMAZZO v. DRYSDALE et al.
No. 12,956;
May 15, 1889.
21 Pac. 553.
Appeal—Assignment of Errors.—Where an appellant fails to point out any error in the order or judgment appealed from, within the time allowed him to file briefs, the supreme court will not examine the record, but will affirm the decision of the trial court.
APPEAL from Superior Court, San Diego County; E. Parker, Judge.
John M. Lucas for appellants; John D. Works and Harry H Titus for respondent.

Opinion:
BEATTY, C. J.
This case was submitted without oral argument on briefs to be filed, the appellants to file the first brief. The time allowed appellants to file their brief has elapsed, no brief has been filed by appellants, no extension of time has been asked, and respondent moves for affirmance of the judgment and order appealed from. Where appellant fails to point out any error in the judgment or order appealed from, the court will not look into the record for the purpose of discovering error. Judgment and order affirmed. Remittitur forthwith.