Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Samuel Paul CROOK, Defendant-Appellant; United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Samuel Paul Crook, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-04-01
Citations: 643 F. App'x 265
Docket Number: Nos. 15-7791, 15-7793
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Samuel Paul CROOK, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Samuel Paul Crook, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, ancl DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 643
Pages: 265–266

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Samuel Paul CROOK, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Samuel Paul Crook, Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 15-7791, 15-7793.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 29, 2016.
Decided: April 1, 2016.
Samuel Paul Crook, Appellant Pro Se. Craig Darren Randall, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, ancl DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Samuel Paul Crook appeals from the district court's order denying his motions filed in his related criminal cases. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Crook, Nos. 3:04-cr-00058-MOC-DSC-1; 3:04-cr-00059-MOC-DSC-1 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 21, 2015). We deny Crook's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials befóre this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.