Case Name: FRANK SCULLY, Appellant, v. AARON J. ROSANOFF, Director of the Department of Institutions, et al., Respondents
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1940-07-23
Citations: 40 Cal. App. 2d 249
Docket Number: Civ. No. 12741
Parties: FRANK SCULLY, Appellant, v. AARON J. ROSANOFF, Director of the Department of Institutions, et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports, Second Series
Volume: 40
Pages: 249–249

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 12741.
Second Appellate District, Division Two.
July 23, 1940.]
FRANK SCULLY, Appellant, v. AARON J. ROSANOFF, Director of the Department of Institutions, et al., Respondents.
A. Brigham Rose, Paul Angelillo and Lucian A. Sauvage for Appellant.
Earl Warren, Attorney-General, and Alberta Belford, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.

Opinion:
THE COURT.
The respondents having served and filed their motion to dismiss the appeal in the above-entitled matter, supported by a certificate of the clerk of the superior court setting forth the facts required by rule VI of this court, and it appearing that more than five months have elapsed since the filing of the notice of appeal, and it appearing that the notice of appeal was filed on the 29th day of December, 1939, and that no notice to prepare the clerk's transcript has been filed, and that no transcript has been filed,
It is hereby ordered that this appeal be, and it hereby is, dismissed.1.