Case Name: Edward BROWN, Appellant, v. FRANKCRUM 1, INC., and Division of Employment Security, Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-07-24
Citations: 370 S.W.3d 932
Docket Number: No. ED 97308
Parties: Edward BROWN, Appellant, v. FRANKCRUM 1, INC., and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.
Judges: Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J. and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J. .
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 370
Pages: 932–932

Head Matter:
Edward BROWN, Appellant, v. FRANKCRUM 1, INC., and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.
No. ED 97308.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
July 24, 2012.
Brendan A. Smith, John J. Ammann, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Robert A. Bedell, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondents.
Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J. and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J. .

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Edward Brown ("Claimant") appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying him unemployment benefits on the ground that' he was discharged for misconduct connected with his work. In light of the Supreme Court's recent holding in Fendler v. Hudson Services et al., 370 S.W.3d 585 (Mo. banc 2012), we cannot find that the Commission erred in finding that Claimant was discharged for misconduct connected with his work.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The decision of the Commission is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).