Case Name: Ronald WARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2018-07-03
Citations: 550 S.W.3d 584
Docket Number: No. ED 105871
Parties: Ronald WARD, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 550
Pages: 584–584

Head Matter:
Ronald WARD, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 105871
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Filed: July 3, 2018
FOR APPELLANT: Kristina Starke Olson, District Defender, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.
FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.
Before Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Ronald Ward appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).