Case Name: BURK v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1911-02-15
Citations: 134 S.W. 705
Docket Number: 
Parties: BURK v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 134
Pages: 705–705

Head Matter:
BURK v. STATE.
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Feb. 15, 1911.)
Ceiminal Law (§ 1094*) — Appeal — Statement oe Facts — Necessity.
Where the record on á criminal appeal contains no statement of facts or bill of exceptions, the judgment will be affirmed.
[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2807, 3204; Dec. Dig. § 1094.*]
Appeal from Criminal District Court, Dallas County; Robert B. Seay, Judge.
Amos Burls was convicted of robbery, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
<3. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Opinion:
DAYIDSON, P. J.
This conviction was for robbery; the punishment being assessed at 15 years' confinement in the penitentiary.
The record is before hs without a statement of the facts or bills of exceptions. The only ground of the motion for new trial is based upon the statement that the verdict and judgment are contrary to law and the evidence. The record, as above stated, being before us without the facts adduced on the trial of the case, this alleged error cannot be reviewed.
The judgment is affirmed.