Case Name: Glenn HENDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROBERTSON, Dr.; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-09-09
Citations: 292 F. App'x 642
Docket Number: No. 05-56553
Parties: Glenn HENDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROBERTSON, Dr.; et al., Defendants — Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 292
Pages: 642–643

Head Matter:
Glenn HENDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROBERTSON, Dr.; et al., Defendants — Appellees.
No. 05-56553.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 26, 2008.
Filed Sept. 9, 2008.
Glemi C. Henderson, Los Angeles, CA, pro se.
Before: SCHROEDER, KLEINFELD, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Glenn Henderson appeals pro se from the district court's order dismissing his diversity action alleging medical malpractice in 1959 or 1960. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Fannucchi & Limi Farms v. United Agri Products, 414 F.3d 1075, 1080 (9th Cir.2005), and we affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Henderson's action as time-barred because, whether N.C. Gen.Stat. § 1 — 15(c) applies, or Cal. Civ. Proc. § 340.5 applies, according to his own pleadings, Henderson's action accrued more than the requisite period before he filed his complaint.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.