Case Name: In re: WESTERN STATES WHOLESALE NATURAL GAS ANTITRUST LITIGATION, Sinclair Oil Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OneOK Energy Services Company, L.P., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-04-21
Citations: 377 F. App'x 622
Docket Number: No. 06-15950
Parties: In re: WESTERN STATES WHOLESALE NATURAL GAS ANTITRUST LITIGATION, Sinclair Oil Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OneOK Energy Services Company, L.P., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before: RYMER, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 377
Pages: 622–623

Head Matter:
In re: WESTERN STATES WHOLESALE NATURAL GAS ANTITRUST LITIGATION, Sinclair Oil Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OneOK Energy Services Company, L.P., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 06-15950.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 5, 2010.
Filed April 21, 2010.
Third Floor South, Jones Vargas, Las Vegas, NV, Melvin Goldstein, Matthew A. Corcoran, Esq., Goldstein & Associates, Washington, DC, Richard E. Day, Esq., Williams Porter Day & Neville, Casper, WY, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Amelia A. Fogelman, Esq., Oliver S. Howard, Esq., Thomas Kirby, Esq., Gable & Gotwals, Tulsa, OK, Thomas F. Reese, Esq., Casper, WY, for Defendant-Appel-lee.
Before: RYMER, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Sinclair Oil Corporation appeals from the district court's judgment dismissing its action as barred by the Filed Rate Doctrine. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. In light of defendant OneOK Energy Services Company, L.P.'s agreement that this case should be remanded following E. & J. Gallo Winery v. EnCana Corp., 503 F.3d 1027 (9th Cir.2007), we reverse and remand.
As the parties agreed in an October 22, 2009 filing, they shall bear their own costs on appeal.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.