Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Florence Chigozie NNA, Rodney Eugene Hill, Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-04-29
Citations: 564 F. App'x 478
Docket Number: No. 13-12196
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Florence Chigozie NNA, Rodney Eugene Hill, Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: Before HULL, MARCUS and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 564
Pages: 478–478

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Florence Chigozie NNA, Rodney Eugene Hill, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 13-12196
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
April 29, 2014.
Steven E. Butler, Kenyen Ray Brown, Vicki M. Davis, Donna Barrow Dobbins, Michele Carstens O’Brien, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Mobile, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Joseph Clark Stankoski, Stankoski, LLP, Fairhope, AL, Paul David Brown, Paul D. Brown, PC, Mobile, AL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before HULL, MARCUS and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Paul D. Brown, appointed counsel for Rodney Eugene Hill in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). J. Clark Stankowski, appointed counsel for Florence Chigozie Nna in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396. Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsels' motions to withdraw are GRANTED, and Hills's and Nna's convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.