Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Felix Claude MARTIN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-12-15
Citations: 84 F. App'x 804
Docket Number: No. 02-10419
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Felix Claude MARTIN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before GOODWIN, WALLACE and MCKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 84
Pages: 804–805

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Felix Claude MARTIN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-10419.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 8, 2003.
Decided Dec. 15, 2003.
Patrick Hanly, Esq., USSC-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Sacramento, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Felix Claude Martin, BSS-Behavioral Systems Southwest, Riverside, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before GOODWIN, WALLACE and MCKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Felix Claude Martin appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Because we cannot review the district court's discretionary decision not to modify Martin's sentence pursuant to § 3582(c)(2), we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See United States v. Lowe, 136 F.3d 1231, 1233 (9th Cir.1998).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.