Case Name: In re HIGHLAND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LP, Debtor, Highland Construction Management Services, LP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA, for the use and benefit of Jerome Guyant IRA, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-09-25
Citations: 583 F. App'x 217
Docket Number: No. 14-1259
Parties: In re HIGHLAND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LP, Debtor, Highland Construction Management Services, LP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA, for the use and benefit of Jerome Guyant IRA, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 583
Pages: 217–218

Head Matter:
In re HIGHLAND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LP, Debtor, Highland Construction Management Services, LP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA, for the use and benefit of Jerome Guyant IRA, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 14-1259.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 24, 2014.
Decided: Sept. 25, 2014.
James P. Campbell, Campbell Flannery PC, Leesburg, Virginia, for Appellant. Neil D. Goldman, Goldman & Van Beek, PC, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Highland Construction Mgmt. Servs., LP, appeals from the district court's order affirming the bankruptcy court's order allowing the proof of claim filed by Wells Fargo Bank, NA (FBO Jerome Guyant IRA) as a secured claim, entitled to priority. We have reviewed the record included on appeal, as well as the parties' briefs, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the courts below. Highland Constr. Mgmt. Servs., LP v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Nos. 1:13-cv-01244-CMH-TR J; 11-bk-11413-RGM (E.D.Va. filed Feb. 21, 2014, entered Feb. 24, 2014; July 30, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.