Case Name: SUGGS v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1916-11-01
Citations: 189 S.W. 266
Docket Number: No. 4273
Parties: SUGGS v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 189
Pages: 266–267

Head Matter:
SUGGS v. STATE.
(No. 4273.)
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Nov. 1, 1916.)
Ckiminal Law <&wkey;1144(14) — Appeal — Presumption.
In the absence of statement of facts and bill of exceptions, it will be presumed that the charge presented the law, and all of it, applicable to the evidence.
[Ed. Note. — Eor other cases, see- Criminal Law, Gent. Dig. §§ 2767, 2901, 3032; Dec. Dig. <&wkey;>1144(14).]
Appeal from Tarrant County Court; Jesse M. Brown, Judge.
Harry Suggs was convicted, and appeals.
Affirmed.
O. O. McDonald, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Opinion:
HARPER, J.
Appellant was convicted of vagrancy in the county court of Tarrant county, from which judgment he prosecutes this appeal.
In the absence of a statement of facts and bills of exception, we must presume the court presented the law, and all the law, applicable to the evidence in his charge.
The judgment is affirmed.
<S=M?or other cases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes