Case Name: Richard Gary DEKRUYFF, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2014-11-25
Citations: 449 S.W.3d 790
Docket Number: WD 76703
Parties: Richard Gary DEKRUYFF, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Division Three: Karen King Mitchell, Presiding Judge, and Cynthia L. Martin and Gary D. Witt, Judges
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 449
Pages: 790–790

Head Matter:
Richard Gary DEKRUYFF, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
WD 76703
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
ORDER FILED: November 25, 2014
S. Kathleen (Kate) Webber, Assistant Appellate Defender Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Appellant,
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.
Before Division Three: Karen King Mitchell, Presiding Judge, and Cynthia L. Martin and Gary D. Witt, Judges

Opinion:
Order
Per Curiam:
Richard Dekruyff appeals, following an evidentiary hearing, the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Dekruyff claims that plea counsel provided ineffective assistance by: (1) failing to intervene when the court granted Dekruyff additional time to plead guilty; and (2) failing to inform both Dekruyff and the court that if Dekruyff did not plead guilty at that time, the State's plea offer would expire. Because Dekruyffs claims on appeal differ from those raised before the motion court, they are not preserved. We affirm the motion court's judgment. Rule 84.16(b).