Case Name: Darriohn Myvar PRYOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2014-11-07
Citations: 151 So. 3d 61
Docket Number: No. 2D13-3753
Parties: Darriohn Myvar PRYOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: KHOUZAM and CRENSHAW, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 151
Pages: 61–61

Head Matter:
Darriohn Myvar PRYOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D13-3753.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Nov. 7, 2014.
Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Bruce P. Taylor, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
MORRIS, Judge.
Darriohn Pryor appeals the revocation of his probation for possession of cocaine and his resulting prison sentence. We remand for the trial court to strike the violation of condition 43 from the order of revocation because the State offered only hearsay evidence, through the testimony of the probation officer, to support that violation. See Beecham v. State, 652 So.2d 1275, 1275 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). However, we affirm the revocation of Pryor's probation because it is clear that the trial court would have revoked his probation based on the other two violations. See Bernier v. State, 951 So.2d 21, 22 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007).
Affirmed; remanded.
KHOUZAM and CRENSHAW, JJ., concur.