Case Name: Roy "X" 9 ROSS, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Warden William H. BANNAN, et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1963-06-20
Citations: 318 F.2d 323
Docket Number: No. 15244
Parties: Roy “X” 9 ROSS, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Warden William H. BANNAN, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 318
Pages: 323–323

Head Matter:
Roy “X” 9 ROSS, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Warden William H. BANNAN, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15244.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
June 20, 1963.
Roy “X” 9 Ross, Jr., Willie “X” Smith, Ernest “X” Ford, appellants, in pro per.
Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor Gen., Lansing, Mich. (Frank J. Kelley, Atty. Gen., Donald T. Kane, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lansing, Mich., on the brief), for appellees.
Before O’SULLIVAN, Circuit Judge, and WILSON and FOX, District Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER.
This Cause having come on to be heard upon the record and briefs, and upon the statement of counsel for appellees, made in open court, and upon due consideration of all of the foregoing,
It Is Ordered that the judgment of the District Court be, and it is, hereby affirmed.