Case Name: STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. John William Francis, Defendant
Court: Montana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Montana
Decision Date: 1997-04-30
Citations: 286 Mont. 26
Docket Number: No. 95-84
Parties: STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. John William Francis, Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Montana Reports
Volume: 286
Pages: 26–26

Head Matter:
APRIL 1997 CALENDAR
FROM: The District Court of the 6th Judicial District. County of Park.
STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. John William Francis, Defendant.
No. 95-84 DECISION
DATED this 30th day of April, 1997.

Opinion:
On December 18, 1995, it was ordered that the defendant, John William Francis, a/k/a Jack Richard Rich, be sentenced to Montana State Prison for a term of ten (10) years for the offense of Theft, a Felony, under Section 46-18-101(3)(b) and defendant is ineligible for parole or supervised release for the entire ten (10) years within the provisions of Section 46-18-201.
On April 18,1997, the Defendant's application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
The Defendant was present and was represented by Kristina Guest, legal intern of the Montana Defender Project. The state was not represented.
Before hearing the application, the Defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also to increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.
Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division provides: "The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive." (Section 45-18-904(3), MCA.) The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.
After careful consideration, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.
Done in open Court this 18th day of April, 1997.
Chairman Hon. G. Todd Baugh, Member Hon. Richard G. Phillips and Member Hon. Russell Fagg.
The Sentence Review Board wishes to thank Kristina Guest, legal intern of the Montana Defender Project, for representing John William Francis in this matter.