Case Name: HETTIE HERTZMARK, PROSECUTOR, v. JOHN CONWAY, SUPERINTENDENT OF BUILDINGS, AND CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY, DEFENDANTS; GEORGE A. CASTEEN, PROSECUTOR, v. JOHN CONWAY. SUPERINTENDENT OF BUILDINGS, AND CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY, DEFENDANTS
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1927-02-26
Citations: 5 N.J. Misc. 302
Docket Number: 
Parties: HETTIE HERTZMARK, PROSECUTOR, v. JOHN CONWAY, SUPERINTENDENT OF BUILDINGS, AND CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY, DEFENDANTS. GEORGE A. CASTEEN, PROSECUTOR, v. JOHN CONWAY. SUPERINTENDENT OF BUILDINGS, AND CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY, DEFENDANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 5
Pages: 302–302

Head Matter:
HETTIE HERTZMARK, PROSECUTOR, v. JOHN CONWAY, SUPERINTENDENT OF BUILDINGS, AND CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY, DEFENDANTS. GEORGE A. CASTEEN, PROSECUTOR, v. JOHN CONWAY. SUPERINTENDENT OF BUILDINGS, AND CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY, DEFENDANTS.
Argued February 23, 1927
Decided February 26, 1927.
Before Justices Parker, Black and Campbell.
Eor the prosecutors, Clifton C. Shinn.
For the defendants, Joseph B. Pershie.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Upon consideration of the affidavits and argument of counsel, we come to the conclusion that the application is without substantial merit.
A writ of certiorari is therefore refused. If a rule to show cause was made herein, the same will be discharged.
Defendants are entitled to costs.