Case Name: Warren H. WHITE and Virginia I. White, Appellants, v. Arthur W. KIRLEW and Dolsie Kirlew, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-02-06
Citations: 574 So. 2d 258
Docket Number: No. 90-0415
Parties: Warren H. WHITE and Virginia I. White, Appellants, v. Arthur W. KIRLEW and Dolsie Kirlew, Appellees.
Judges: GUNTHER and GARRETT, JJ., and WALDEN,' JAMES H„ (Retired), Associate Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 574
Pages: 258–259

Head Matter:
Warren H. WHITE and Virginia I. White, Appellants, v. Arthur W. KIRLEW and Dolsie Kirlew, Appellees.
No. 90-0415.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb. 6, 1991.
Rehearing Denied March 7, 1991.
Susan E. Trench of Goldstein & Tanen, P.A., Miami, for appellants.
Andrew Helgesen of Harris, Kukey & Helgesen, P.A., Palm Beach Gardens, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is a suit for rescission of a sales contract concerning residential property. The buyers alleged that the sellers were guilty of misrepresenting that the house was concrete block construction when in fact it was stucco frame construction.
We reverse the final summary judgment entered in favor of the buyers because there were material issues of fact which stood in the way of a judgment being entered as a matter of law. Those issues include whether the sellers knew that the buyers only wanted a concrete house, whether they knew that their agent stated in the listing, and told the buyers, that their house was concrete, and whether they knew that their house was not concrete. We reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent herewith.
GUNTHER and GARRETT, JJ., and WALDEN,' JAMES H" (Retired), Associate Judge, concur.