Case Name: Barbara E. RIPPEL, Appellant-Respondent, v. Charles WORSTELL and Brenda Worstell, Respondents-Appellants
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1989-02-28
Citations: 767 S.W.2d 594
Docket Number: No. WD 40806
Parties: Barbara E. RIPPEL, Appellant-Respondent, v. Charles WORSTELL and Brenda Worstell, Respondents-Appellants.
Judges: Before MANFORD, P.J., and TURNAGE and LOWENSTEIN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 767
Pages: 594–594

Head Matter:
Barbara E. RIPPEL, Appellant-Respondent, v. Charles WORSTELL and Brenda Worstell, Respondents-Appellants.
No. WD 40806.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Feb. 28, 1989.
Rehearing Denied May 2, 1989.
Everett S. Van Matre of Van Matre & Van Matre, Inc., Mexico, for Barbara E. Rippel.
C. Christy Barton, Jefferson City, and Dewey L. Crepeau of Crepeau & Roberts, Columbia, for the Worstells.
Before MANFORD, P.J., and TURNAGE and LOWENSTEIN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Direct appeal from a judgment denying enforcement of promissory notes due to the defense of fraud in the inducement. Cross-appeal from a judgment denying recision and cancellation of the promissory notes and related sales contract, and damages. The appeals are consolidated.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).