Case Name: Kevin Edward HEDGEPETH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. C. WILKES, police officer; Andrew Murray; John Doe; Martha H. Curran; Lisa C. Bell, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-11-26
Citations: 489 F. App'x 728
Docket Number: No. 12-7086
Parties: Kevin Edward HEDGEPETH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. C. WILKES, police officer; Andrew Murray; John Doe; Martha H. Curran; Lisa C. Bell, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 489
Pages: 728–729

Head Matter:
Kevin Edward HEDGEPETH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. C. WILKES, police officer; Andrew Murray; John Doe; Martha H. Curran; Lisa C. Bell, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 12-7086.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 20, 2012.
Decided: Nov. 26, 2012.
Kevin Edward Hedgepeth, Appellant Pro Se.
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kevin Edward Hedgepeth appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hedgepeth v. Wilkes, No. 3:12-cv-00262-RJC, 2012 WL 2092853 (W.D.N.C. June 11, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.