Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sheila Denise WHITE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-09-03
Citations: 393 F. App'x 993
Docket Number: No. 10-6702
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sheila Denise WHITE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 393
Pages: 993–994

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sheila Denise WHITE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-6702.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 26, 2010.
Decided: Sept. 3, 2010.
Sheila Denise White, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Sheila Denise White appeals the district court's order denying her motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. White, No. 5:05-cr-00009-RLV-DCK-17 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 29, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.