Case Name: Pedro LAZO, Appellant, v. BENEFIT TRUST LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1994-08-09
Citations: 640 So. 2d 1224
Docket Number: No. 94-109
Parties: Pedro LAZO, Appellant, v. BENEFIT TRUST LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 640
Pages: 1224–1224

Head Matter:
Pedro LAZO, Appellant, v. BENEFIT TRUST LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.
No. 94-109.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Aug. 9, 1994.
Robert G. Corirossi, Nard S. Helman, Miami, for appellant.
Shutts & Bowen, Brenton N. Ver Ploeg and Stephen S. Stallings, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The summary judgment entered below for the insurance company under section 627.-409, Florida Statutes (1991), is reversed because the record demonstrates unresolved material issues as to "the extent of the questions asked by the insurance agent, the accuracy of the answers given by the insured[,] the insured's alleged misrepresentation[s]," Travelers Ins. Co. v. Zimmerman, 309 So.2d 569, 570 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975), and their materiality. Union Am. Ins. Co. v. Fernandez, 603 So.2d 653 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Underwriters Nat'l Assurance Co. v. Harrison, 338 So.2d 58 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).