Case Name: Dorman W. CHANDLER and W. Fred Dryden, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1966-10-27
Citations: 368 F.2d 152
Docket Number: No. 22706
Parties: Dorman W. CHANDLER and W. Fred Dryden, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 368
Pages: 152–153

Head Matter:
Dorman W. CHANDLER and W. Fred Dryden, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 22706.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
Oct. 27, 1966.
Harold L. Murphy, Howe & Murphy, Tallapoosa, Ga., for appellants.
Allen L. Chancey, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Charles L. Goodson, U. S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.
Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and BROWN and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. We conclude that the trial court did not err in refusing to permit the appellants to compel the- Government witness to state whether a person, prominently identified in the reported activities of appellants, but not called as a witness in the case, was a Government informer.
The judgment is, therefore, affirmed.