Case Name: William THOMAS, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-01-31
Citations: 895 S.W.2d 137
Docket Number: No. 66328
Parties: William THOMAS, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before GRIMM, P.J., and CARL R. GAERTNER and AHRENS, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 895
Pages: 137–138

Head Matter:
William THOMAS, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent.
No. 66328.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Jan. 31, 1995.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 7, 1995.
Application to Transfer Denied April 25, 1995.
Dave Hemingway, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Fernando Bermudez, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before GRIMM, P.J., and CARL R. GAERTNER and AHRENS, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
Pursuant to a plea bargain, movant pled guilty to first degree robbery and second degree robbery. Although the State recommended concurrent twenty year sentences, the trial court sentenced defendant to concurrent eighteen year sentences as he suggested.
We have reviewed movant's allegations, the transcript of his pleas of guilty and sentencing, and the motion court's findings and conclusions. Those findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(j). An opinion would have no precedential value.
The motion court's judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).