Case Name: In the Interest of C.M., Plaintiff; Juvenile Officer, Respondent; State of Missouri, Department of Social Services, Division of Family Services, Respondent, v. W.S.M. (Mother), Appellant, and S.M. (Father), Defendant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-03-13
Citations: 39 S.W.3d 846
Docket Number: No. WD 58265
Parties: In the Interest of C.M., Plaintiff; Juvenile Officer, Respondent; State of Missouri, Department of Social Services, Division of Family Services, Respondent, v. W.S.M. (Mother), Appellant, and S.M. (Father), Defendant.
Judges: Before ULRICH, P.J., SMITH and NEWTON, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 39
Pages: 846–847

Head Matter:
In the Interest of C.M., Plaintiff; Juvenile Officer, Respondent; State of Missouri, Department of Social Services, Division of Family Services, Respondent, v. W.S.M. (Mother), Appellant, and S.M. (Father), Defendant.
No. WD 58265.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
March 13, 2001.
Michael J. Kuster, Jefferson City, MO, Guardian ad Litem.
Cyril M. Hendricks, Jefferson City, MO, for Appellant W.S.M.
Curtis G. Hanrahan, Jefferson City, MO, for Defendant S.M.
Jeanne M. Gordon, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent Juvenile Officer.
Amy V. Woods, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent Social Services-DFS.
Before ULRICH, P.J., SMITH and NEWTON, JJ.

Opinion:
Order
PER CURIAM:
C.M. was removed from his mother's and father's custody shortly after his birth. The trial court entered a judgment placing C.M. in the custody of DFS. The original petition for the termination, of parental rights was filed on March 23, 1999, and later amended on May 25, 1999. The trial court found that W.S.M. was unfit to be a party to a parent-child relationship because her parental rights were involuntarily terminated as to two other children in the last three years, despite the extensive services provided by DFS. S.M. voluntarily consented to the termination of his parental rights to C .M. W.S.M. appeals the termination of her parental rights.
For reasons set forth in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm the judgment. Rule 84.16(b).