Case Name: Nancy L. DOYLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RITE AID CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-03-08
Citations: 415 F. App'x 460
Docket Number: No. 10-1251
Parties: Nancy L. DOYLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RITE AID CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 415
Pages: 460–460

Head Matter:
Nancy L. DOYLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RITE AID CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 10-1251.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 28, 2011.
Decided: March 8, 2011.
Mindy G. Farber, Farber Legal, LLC, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellant. James A. Rothschild, Anderson Coe & King, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Ap-pellee.
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Nancy L. Doyle appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Rite Aid Corporation in her employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Doyle v. Rite Aid Corp., No. 1:08-cv-01106-RDB, 2010 WL 445387 (D.Md. Feb. 1, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.