Case Name: MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY v. JOHN F. REES COMPANY
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1941-06-05
Citations: 34 Ohio Law Abs. 485
Docket Number: No 3374
Parties: MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY v JOHN F. REES COMPANY
Judges: GEIGER, PJ., BARNES and HORN-BECK, JJ., concur.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 34
Pages: 485–485

Head Matter:
MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY v JOHN F. REES COMPANY
Ohio Appeals, 2nd Dist, Franklin Co
No 3374.
Decided June 5, 1941
Welles, Kelsey, Cobourn & Harrington, Toledo, and C. C. Crabbe, Garek & Sillman, Columbus, for plaintiff-appellee, Maryland Casualty Co., and for the motion.
L Maxwell Maher, Columbus, and Luther L. Boger, Columbus, for defendant-appellant, The John F. Rees Co., and contra the motion.

Opinion:
OPINION
BY THE COURT:
Submitted on motion of plaintiffappellee to dismiss the appeal "for the reason that the same is not within the jurisdiction of this Court, as the order of the Common Pleas Court from which the appeal is purportedly taken is not a final order affecting any substantial right of the defendant-appellant, The John F. Rees Company".
The question presented is, Is an order vacating a judgment of dismissal after term and reinstating the case a final order. We are or the opinion that it is. Dunlevy, Sr. et v Fidelity Ass'n. et, 32 Abs 493, and cases therein cited. See also Braden v Hoffman, 46 Oh St 639.
Motion will be overruled.
GEIGER, PJ., BARNES and HORN-BECK, JJ., concur.