Case Name: Schieffelin & Co., Respondent, v. R. H. Macy & Co., Inc., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1966-05-19
Citations: 25 A.D.2d 843
Docket Number: 
Parties: Schieffelin & Co., Respondent, v. R. H. Macy & Co., Inc., Appellant.
Judges: Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, McNally, Steyens and Eager, JJ.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 25
Pages: 843–843

Head Matter:
Schieffelin & Co., Respondent, v. R. H. Macy & Co., Inc., Appellant.

Opinion:
Order and judgment granting plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $50 eosts and disbursements to defendant-appellant, and the motion denied. There are questions of fact as to whether plaintiff has abandoned the contract and whether plaintiff is using the contract to favor some retailers over the defendant. (Millerton Agway Coop. v. Briarcliff Farms, 17 N Y 2d 57.)
Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, McNally, Steyens and Eager, JJ.