Case Name: Linda TROWBRIDGE, Plaintiff-counter-defendant-Appellee, v. Judy TROWBRIDGE, Defendant-counter-claimant-Appellant, and Southern California Operating Engineers Pension Trust Fund, Counter-defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-01-06
Citations: 161 F. App'x 686
Docket Number: No. 04-55088; D.C. No. CV-02-08544-ABC
Parties: Linda TROWBRIDGE, Plaintiff-counter-defendant—Appellee, v. Judy TROWBRIDGE, Defendant-counter-claimant—Appellant, and Southern California Operating Engineers Pension Trust Fund, Counter-defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 161
Pages: 686–686

Head Matter:
Linda TROWBRIDGE, Plaintiff-counter-defendant—Appellee, v. Judy TROWBRIDGE, Defendant-counter-claimant—Appellant, and Southern California Operating Engineers Pension Trust Fund, Counter-defendant.
No. 04-55088.
D.C. No. CV-02-08544-ABC.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Oct. 20, 2005.
Decided Jan. 6, 2006.
June Adler, Attorney at Law, Granada Hills, CA, for Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee.
Gary M. Spritz, Law Offices of Gary M. Spritz, Malibu, CA, for Defendant-Counter-Claimani>-Appellant.
Before FRIEDMAN, O’SCANNLAIN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Daniel M. Friedman, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Judy Trowbridge, the putative spouse of decedent Charles Trowbridge, appeals the district court's judgment awarding Charles' pension benefits to Linda Trow-bridge, his first wife. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
In this appeal, Judy Trowbridge argues that she, not Linda, was entitled to receive all of Charles' pension benefits other than the community property interest that Linda accrued between 1959 and 1965. We disagree and affirm the judgment for the reasons stated in the district court's Amended Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law After Court Trial, entered November 24, 2003.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.