Case Name: Antanitis v. Hecht, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1968-11-12
Citations: 432 Pa. 620
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 129
Parties: Antanitis v. Hecht, Appellant.
Judges: Before Bell, C. J., Musmanno, Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O’Brien and Roberts, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 432
Pages: 620–621

Head Matter:
Antanitis v. Hecht, Appellant.
Argued October 10, 1968.
Before Bell, C. J., Musmanno, Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O’Brien and Roberts, JJ.
Francis S. Patrono, with him Robert D. Beck, and Patrono, Geisler and Edwards, for appellant.
¡Stephen I. Richman, with him Greenlee, Richma'ii, Derrico & Posa, for appellee.
November 12, 1968:

Opinion:
Opinion
Pee Curiam,
This is an appeal by defendant after a jury verdict for plaintiffs in claims arising from an automobile collision. The evidence as to negligence was conflicting, the verdicts were not excessive, and there was no error of law or abuse of discretion in the lower Court's refusal to grant a new trial or a judgment n.o.v.
Judgment affirmed.
Mr. Justice Musmanno did not participate in the decision of this case.