Case Name: Northern Cedar Company v. Frank H. Gloyd, as Director of Agriculture of the State of Washington et al.; Yakima County Horticultural Union v. Frank H. Gloyd, as Director of Agriculture of the State of Washington, et al.; and C. W. Chamberlain & Company et al. v. Frank H. Gloyd, as Director of Agriculture of the State of Washington, et al.
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1926-01-18
Citations: 270 U.S. 625
Docket Number: No. 729; No. 730; No. 731
Parties: Northern Cedar Company v. Frank H. Gloyd, as Director of Agriculture of the State of Washington et al.; Yakima County Horticultural Union v. Frank H. Gloyd, as Director of Agriculture of the State of Washington, et al.; and C. W. Chamberlain & Company et al. v. Frank H. Gloyd, as Director of Agriculture of the State of Washington, et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 270
Pages: 625–626

Head Matter:
No. 729.
No. 730.
No. 731.
Northern Cedar Company v. Frank H. Gloyd, as Director of Agriculture of the State of Washington et al.; Yakima County Horticultural Union v. Frank H. Gloyd, as Director of Agriculture of the State of Washington, et al.; and C. W. Chamberlain & Company et al. v. Frank H. Gloyd, as Director of Agriculture of the State of Washington, et al.
Submitted January 13, 1926.
Decided January 18, 1926.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Louisiana Navigation Co. v. Oyster Commission, 226 U. S. 99, 101; Coe v. Armour Fertilizer Works, 237 U. S. 413, 418, 419; Gray's Harbor Logging Co. v. Coats-Ford ney Logging Co., 243 U. S. 251, 255; Bruce v. Tobin, 245 U. S, 18, 19.
Mr. Dallas v. Halverstadt for plaintiffs,in error. Mr. John H. Dunbar for defendants in error.