Case Name: HUGH DONNELLY, Appellant v. GEORGE B. MORRIS, Respondent
Court: New York Superior Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1891-01-05
Citations: 27 Jones & S. 557
Docket Number: 
Parties: HUGH DONNELLY, Appellant v. GEORGE B. MORRIS, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Reports of cases argued and determined in the Superior Court of the city of New York
Volume: 59
Pages: 557–557

Head Matter:
HUGH DONNELLY, Appellant v. GEORGE B. MORRIS, Respondent.
Injunction against prosecuting an action commenced in another state, what not ground for—Inconvenience in ascertaining facts, and in going to the other state to defend the action there, is not ground for injunction.
Before Sedgwick, Ch. J., and Freedman, J.
Decided January 5, 1891.
Appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for an injunction restraining defendant from prosecuting an action in . Massachusetts, the complaint praying, among other things, for that relief.
LaRoy S. Gove, attorney and of counsel, for appellant.
Bliss & Schley, attorneys, and George Bliss of counsel, for respondent.

Opinion:
The Court (per Curiam) in affirming the order held as stated in the head note.