Case Name: In the INTEREST OF P.T.D., a Child State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee v. P.T.D., Child, and T.P.D., Father, Respondents and A.R.D., Mother, Respondent and Appellant In the Interest of C.R.D., a Child State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee v. C.R.D., Child, and T.P.D., Father, Respondents and A.R.D., Mother, Respondent and Appellant In the Interest of P.A.D., a Child State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee v. P.A.D., Child, and T.P.D., Father, Respondents and A.R.D., Mother, Respondent and Appellant In the Interest of P.P.D., a Child State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee v. P.P.D., Child, and T.P.D., Father, Respondents and A.R.D., Mother, Respondent and Appellant In the Interest of N.A.D., a Child State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee v. N.A.D., Child, and T.P.D., Father, Respondents and A.R.D., Mother, Respondent and Appellant
Court: North Dakota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: North Dakota
Decision Date: 2019-01-15
Citations: 921 N.W.2d 176
Docket Number: No. 20180192; No. 20180193; No. 20180194; No. 20180195; No. 20180196
Parties: In the INTEREST OF P.T.D., a Child
Judges: 
Reporter: North Western Reporter 2d
Volume: 921
Pages: 176–176

Head Matter:
In the INTEREST OF P.T.D., a Child
State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee
v.
P.T.D., Child, and T.P.D., Father, Respondents
and
A.R.D., Mother, Respondent and Appellant
In the Interest of C.R.D., a Child
State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee
v.
C.R.D., Child, and T.P.D., Father, Respondents
and
A.R.D., Mother, Respondent and Appellant
In the Interest of P.A.D., a Child
State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee
v.
P.A.D., Child, and T.P.D., Father, Respondents
and
A.R.D., Mother, Respondent and Appellant
In the Interest of P.P.D., a Child
State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee
v.
P.P.D., Child, and T.P.D., Father, Respondents
and
A.R.D., Mother, Respondent and Appellant
In the Interest of N.A.D., a Child
State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee
v.
N.A.D., Child, and T.P.D., Father, Respondents
and
A.R.D., Mother, Respondent and Appellant
No. 20180192
No. 20180193
No. 20180194
No. 20180195
No. 20180196
Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Filed January 15, 2019
Frederick R. Fremgen, State's Attorney, Jamestown, ND, for petitioner and appellee.
Kiara Kraus-Parr, Grand Forks, ND, for respondent and appellant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
[¶1] A.D. appeals from a juvenile court order finding her five children to be deprived. On appeal, A.D. argues the juvenile court erred by finding the children to be deprived because the unsanitary and dangerous household has been cured by a move to a new home, any drug issues are now under control, there was no evidence she used drugs around the children, and the record does not contain any evidence her actions have negatively affected the children. We conclude the juvenile court's findings are not clearly erroneous. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Jon J. Jensen
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers
Jerod E. Tufte