Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles TUSO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1956-10-10
Citations: 237 F.2d 720
Docket Number: No. 143, Docket 24327
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles TUSO, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and HAND and SWAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 237
Pages: 720–720

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles TUSO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 143, Docket 24327.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued Oct. 8, 1956.
Decided Oct. 10, 1956.
Goldstein &. Goldstein, New York City (Gilbert Goldstein and Lawrence Kovalsky, New York City, of counsel) for appellant.
Paul W. Williams, U. S. Atty., for -Southern District of New York, New York City (Thomas B. Gilchrist, Jr., Chief Assistant, Arthur H. Christy, Chief, Criminal Division, New York City, and John A. Keeffe, Asst. U. S. Attys., New York City, of counsel), for appellee.
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and HAND and SWAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The court sees no distinction between this case and Dioguardi appeal, United States v. Dioguardi, 2 Cir., 237 F.2d 57.
Order affirmed.