Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. TROY DAVID COLLINS, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2002-02-20
Citations: 179 Or. App. 669
Docket Number: 99050918, 99122843, 00051182; A111001, A111184, A111185
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. TROY DAVID COLLINS, Appellant.
Judges: Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Linder and Wollheim, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 179
Pages: 669–670

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted January 30,
remanded in part; otherwise affirmed February 20, 2002
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. TROY DAVID COLLINS, Appellant.
99050918, 99122843, 00051182; A111001 (Control), A111184, A111185
(Cases Consolidated)
40 P3d 1106
David E. Groom, Oregon Public Defender, and Stephanie Hortsch, Deputy Public Defender, filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General, and Kaye E. McDonald, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Linder and Wollheim, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
In Linn County Circuit Court Case No. 00051182, defendant was convicted of assault in the fourth degree, ORS 163.160. The trial court sentenced him to 20 months' imprisonment and 24 months' post-prison supervision. As a condition of post-prison supervision, the court ordered defendant to have no contact with the victim. Defendant appeals, challenging the court's imposition of a condition of post-prison supervision. The state concedes that the trial court lacked authority to impose a condition of post-prison supervision. The state's concession is well founded, and we accept it. See, e.g., State v. Wright, 128 Or App 88, 875 P2d 1174 (1994) (sentencing court lacks authority to impose conditions of post-prison supervision).
Remanded for entry of corrected judgment in Case No. 00051182; otherwise affirmed.