Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Wayne T. JACKSON, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2017-04-18
Citations: 516 S.W.3d 446
Docket Number: No. ED 103972
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Wayne T. JACKSON, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Colleen Dolan, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 516
Pages: 446–447

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Wayne T. JACKSON, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 103972
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Filed: April 18, 2017
Richard A. Starnes, Jefferson City, MO, for Plaintiff/Respondent
Srikant Chigurupati, St. Louis, MO, for Defendant/Appellant
Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Colleen Dolan, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Wayne T. Jackson appeals from the trial court's judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of first-degree child molestation and first-degree statutory sodomy. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion in excluding certain evidence. State v. Taylor, 504 S.W.3d 116, 120 (Mo. App. E.D. 2016). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).