Case Name: Case of Michael Myers
Court: New York State Assembly
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1792-01-06
Citations: 1 Armstrong. Election Cases 14
Docket Number: 
Parties: Case of Michael Myers.
Judges: 
Reporter: Armstrong's Contested Election Cases in New York
Volume: 1
Pages: 14–16

Head Matter:
Case of Michael Myers.
Heekimeb County — Seat Retained. — Petition oe Eleotoes PRESENTED.
Assembly Chamber, City of New York,
Jan. 6th, 1792.)
A petition of Hugh White, Jedediah Sanger, and Jonas Platt, Esqs., on behalf of themselves and many of the electors of Herkimer county, was read, setting forth that at the meeting of the supervisors of said county, in May last, for the purpose of canvassing and estimating the votes for a member to represent the said county in Assembly, two affidavits were delivered to the supervisors, that one or more voter or voters, at the election in Whitestown, put their ballots into the election box with their own hands, whereas they ought to have been delivered to one of the inspectoi’s ; that thereupon, the supervisor of the town of Herkimer, and the supervisor of the town of G-erman Flats, refused to suffer the said votes to be opened or received, but declared that they should be destroyed. That the supervisors of the town of Whitestown insisted that the bundle' of votes was legally returned to that board, and ought to be counted; that if the inspectors of that election had proceeded irregularly, they were punishable, but that the board of supervisors were not authorized to go into such inquiry; that the ballots taken in Whitestown were rejected and destroyed, without any other charge or pretence of irregularity whatsoever, and the election determined from the ballots of the towns of Herkimer and German Plats only; that it is a prevailing opinion in the county, that if the ballots of Whitestown had been counted, Michael Myers, Esq., would not baye had a plurality of votes, and could not have been returned as a member in Assembly; that fearing the evil consequences of so dangerous a precedent, they humbly pray that the seat of the said Michael Myers, Esq., in this House, may be vacated. Several depositions referred to in the said petition were also read.
Ordered, That the said petition and the several depositions which accompany, the same, be committed to the committee of privileges and elections.
Assembly Journal, 1792, pages 9, 10.

Opinion:
RepoRT oe Committee.
January fflth, 1792.
Mr. Smith, of Suffolk, county, from the committee of privileges and elections, to whom were referred the petition of Hugh White, Jedediah Sanger and Jonas Platt, and the several depositions which accompanied the same, reported the following state of facts, viz.:
That on the last Tuesday .of May last, John Porteo us, Frederick Fox and Jedediah Sanger, being the whole of the supervisors of the county of Herkimer, met, pursuant to law, to canvass and estimate the votes for a member to represent the said county in Assembly. That on the same day, the clerk of the said county delivered to the said supervisors the bundles of poll lists and ballots, from all the respective towns in the said county, and that all the said bundles of poll list and ballots were folded up and subscribed and sealed as tjhe law directs.
That it appears to the committee, by several depositions, that during the said canvass, William Colbrath and Caleb Merrill were present at the election held at Whitestown, in the county of Herkimer, for a member to represent the said county in Assembly, and that'they saw one or more persons who voted at the said election, held in Whitestown, put their ballots into the election box, without delivering the same to one of the inspectors of the said election, and that thereupon, John Porteous and Frederick Fox, being a majority of the said supervisors, determined that the poll lists and ballots taken in Whitestown ought to be destroyed, and that the said bundles were accordingly destroyed by Jedediah Sanger, one of the said supervisors, without being examined. That after the said poll lists and ballots were destroyed, a majority of the said supervisors determined that Michael Myers was legally elected a member of Assembly from the county of Herkimer, and accordingly gave tlie said Michael Myers a certificate of his election. •
A petition from Jonas Platt, praying to be heard, by counsel, at the bar of this- House, on the last preceding report and the matters relating thereto, was read; thereupon,
Ordered, That the petitioners be heard, by counsel, at the bar of this House, on Monday next, at 12 o'clock, on the last preceding report and matters relative to. the same.
Assembly Journal, 1792, pages 40, 41.
MlOTIAEL MYERS RETAINS HIS SEAT.
January 30iA, 1792.
The order for the day was read, that the petitioners be heard by counsel at the bar of this House, on the report of the committee o'f privileges and elections, on the petition of Hugh White and others, and the several depositions which accompanied the same, relative to the seat of Michael Myers, Esq., in this House, as a member from Herkimer county.
That said report as inserted in the Journal of this House, of the 27th instant, was read, and Jonas Platt, Esq., for himself, and of counsel for the other petitioners, was heard at the bar of the House.
The House then proceeded to the consideration of the said report, and the depositions on the subject thereby reported, and which were formerly read in the House, and also several depositions relative thereto, which were obtained by the committee of privileges and elections, were read and considered, and** debates had thereon. ,
Mr. Havens then made a motion for a resolution, in the words following, viz.:
lie solved, That Michael Myers, Esq., returned as a member of this House, elected in the county of Herkimer, is not duly elected, and that therefore his seat be vacated.
The question being put, whether tiie House did concur in the said resolution, it passed in the negative.
Assembly Journal, 1792, pages 41, 42.