Case Name: Venessa BADGER, Claimant/Appellant, v. CHILD CENTER-MARYGROVE, Employer, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2013-06-11
Citations: 400 S.W.3d 867
Docket Number: No. ED 99036
Parties: Venessa BADGER, Claimant/Appellant, v. CHILD CENTER-MARYGROVE, Employer, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., MARY KAY HOFF, J., and LISA VAN AMBURG, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 400
Pages: 867–867

Head Matter:
Venessa BADGER, Claimant/Appellant, v. CHILD CENTER-MARYGROVE, Employer, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 99036.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
June 11, 2013.
John J. Ammann, Saint Louis University Law Clinic, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Larry R. Ruhmann, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., MARY KAY HOFF, J., and LISA VAN AMBURG, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Claimant, Venessa Badger, appeals from the Order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the decision of the Appeals Tribunal of the Division of Employment Security finding claimant ineligible for unemployment benefits. The Order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm the Order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).