Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James M. Vernooy, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2017-06-09
Citations: 151 A.D.3d 1741
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James M. Vernooy, Appellant.
Judges: Present — Centra, J.P., Peradotto, Carni, NeMoyer and Curran, JJ.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 151
Pages: 1741–1741

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James M. Vernooy, Appellant.
[53 NYS3d 846]

Opinion:
Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Victoria M. Argento, J.), rendered July 24, 2014. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of driving while intoxicated, a class E felony.
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of driving while intoxicated as a class E felony (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 [3]; 1193 [1] [c] [i] [A]), defendant contends that County Court failed to apprise him at his plea hearing of all of the components of his possible enhanced sentence, including a term of probation and a fine. That contention is not preserved for our review (see generally People v Crowder, 24 NY3d 1134, 1136-1137 [2015]), and we decline to exercise our power to review it as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15 [3] [c]; see generally People v Jones, 118 AD3d 1360, 1361 [2014]).
Defendant's waiver of the right to appeal encompasses his contention that his sentence is unduly harsh and severe (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255-256 [2006]; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]; cf. People v Maracle, 19 NY3d 925, 928 [2012]).
Present — Centra, J.P., Peradotto, Carni, NeMoyer and Curran, JJ.