Case Name: Matthew B. RANDOLPH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2016-09-27
Citations: 510 S.W.3d 348
Docket Number: ED 104224
Parties: Matthew B. RANDOLPH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before: James M. Dowd, P.J., Kurt S. Odenwald, J., and Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 510
Pages: 348–348

Head Matter:
Matthew B. RANDOLPH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
ED 104224
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
Filed: September 27, 2016
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied October 26, 2016
Application for Transfer Denied February 28, 2017
Matthew B. Randolph, Cameron, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before: James M. Dowd, P.J., Kurt S. Odenwald, J., and Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Matthew B. Randolph appeals from the motion court's judgment denying without an evidentiary hearing his motion for leave to file his 2012 Rule 29.15 for post-conviction relief out of time. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court's denial was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2016).