Case Name: Gerard T. PAWLOWICZ, Appellant, v. Diane M. PAWLOWICZ n/k/a Schwartz, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-02-08
Citations: 156 S.W.3d 422
Docket Number: No. ED 83831
Parties: Gerard T. PAWLOWICZ, Appellant, v. Diane M. PAWLOWICZ n/k/a Schwartz, Respondent.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J. and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 156
Pages: 422–422

Head Matter:
Gerard T. PAWLOWICZ, Appellant, v. Diane M. PAWLOWICZ n/k/a Schwartz, Respondent.
No. ED 83831.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Feb. 8, 2005.
Richard K Zerr, Burke, Zerr, Wulff & Briscoe, St. Charles, MO, for appellant.
Robert E. Faerber, James J. Leightner, Clayton, MO, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J. and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Gerard T. Pawlowicz ("Husband"), appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Charles County denying Husband's motion to modify the decree of dissolution of his marriage to respondent, Diane M. Pawlowicz ("Wife"). We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.