Case Name: SANDERS v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1912-06-19
Citations: 148 S.W. 566
Docket Number: 
Parties: SANDERS v. STATE.
Judges: DAVIDSON, P. .1., not sitting.
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 148
Pages: 566–567

Head Matter:
SANDERS v. STATE.
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
June 19, 1912.)
Criminal Law (§§ 1063, 1094, 1101*) — Appeal — Disposition.
An appeal from a conviction must be affirmed, where there is no motion for new trial, no statement of facts, and no bill of exceptions, and where the indictment charges an offense, and the trial court ’Submitted that offense.
[Ed. Note. — For other eases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2653, 2673, 2676-2684, 2807, 3204; Dec. Dig. §§ 1063, 1094, 1101.*]
Appeal from District Court, Grayson County; J. M. Pearson, Judge.
Pete Sanders was convicted of forgery, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Opinion:
HARPER, J.
Appellant was indicted, tried, and convicted of the offense of forgery, and Ms punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary.
There is no motion for new trial, no statement of facts, nor any bills of exceptions in the record. The indictment charges an offense, and the court submits that offense.
The judgment is affirmed.
DAVIDSON, P. .1., not sitting.