Case Name: In re: KOREAN AIR LINES CO., LTD., ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Court: United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-12-19
Citations: 528 F. Supp. 2d 1372
Docket Number: MDL No. 1891
Parties: In re: KOREAN AIR LINES CO., LTD., ANTITRUST LITIGATION.
Judges: Before JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman, D. LOWELL JENSEN, J. FREDERICK MOTZ, ROBERT L. MILLER, JR., KATHRYN H. VRATIL, DAVID R. HANSEN, ANTHONY J. SCIRICA , Judges of the Panel.
Reporter: Federal Supplement 2d
Volume: 528
Pages: 1372–1374

Head Matter:
In re: KOREAN AIR LINES CO., LTD., ANTITRUST LITIGATION.
MDL No. 1891.
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.
Dec. 19, 2007.
Before JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman, D. LOWELL JENSEN, J. FREDERICK MOTZ, ROBERT L. MILLER, JR., KATHRYN H. VRATIL, DAVID R. HANSEN, ANTHONY J. SCIRICA , Judges of the Panel.
Judge Scirica did not participate in the decision of this matter.

Opinion:
TRANSFER ORDER
JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.
Before the entire Panel *: Plaintiffs in three actions have moved, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings of this litigation as follows: (I) plaintiff in one Western District of Washington action has moved for centralization in the Western District of Washington; (2) plaintiffs in one Central District of California action have moved for centralization in the Central District of California; and (3) plaintiff in one Northern District of California action has moved for centralization in the Northern District of California. All responding parties agree that centralization is appropriate and variously support one or more of the previous three suggested districts, the District of Massachusetts or the Eastern District of New York.
This litigation currently consists of 25 actions listed on Schedule A and pending in six districts as follows: ten actions each in the Northern District of California and the Western District of Washington; two actions in the Central District of California; and one action each in the District of Massachusetts, the District of Nevada, and the Eastern District of New York.
On the basis of the papers filed and hearing session held, we find that these actions involve common questions of fact, and that centralization under Section 1407 in the Central District of California will serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and promote the just and efficient conduct of this litigation. These actions share factual questions relating to allegations that defendants, Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd. and Asiana Airlines, Inc., conspired to fix prices of passenger airfares for flights between the United States and Korea in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. Centralization under Section 1407 will eliminate duplicative discovery; prevent inconsistent pretrial rulings, especially with, respect to class certification; and conserve the resources of the parties, their counsel and the judiciary.
We are persuaded that the Central District of California is an appropriate transferee forum for this litigation, because (1) two constituent actions and sixteen potential tag-along actions are already pending there; and (2) both defendants maintain their primary domestic office in Los Angeles, where discovery may be found.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, the actions listed on Schedule A and pending outside the Central District of California are transferred to the Central District of California and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable S. James Otero for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending there and listed on Schedule A.
SCHEDULE A
MDL-1891-In re: Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd., Antitrust Litigation
Central District of California
Hyun Park, et al. v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd., C.A. No. 2:07-5107 Desa Philadelphia v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd., C.A. No. 2:07-5453
Northern District of California
Hee Ho Chung, et al. v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd., et al., C.A. No. 3:07-3985
Hwa Ja Chung v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd., C.A. No. 3:07-4016 Ben Lee v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd., C.A. No. 3:07-4085
Yoon S. Chang v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd., et al., C.A. No. 3:07-4244
Kirby K. Kim v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd., C.A. No. 3:07-4245
Scott McLean v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd., et al, C.A. No. 3:07-4297
Martin Kaufman v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd., et al., C.A. No. 3:07-4349
Kaz Fujita v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd., et al., C.A. No. 3:07-4489
Amy Bricker v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd., et al., C.A. No. 3:07-4508
Michael Lee v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd., et al., C.A. No. 3:07-4509
District of Massachusetts
Song Kim v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd., C.A. No. 1:07-11427
District of Nevada
Sook Yung Lee v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd., et al, C.A. No. 2:07-1151
Eastern District of New York
Yoong Kim v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd., et al., C.A. No. 2:07-3526
Western District of Washington
James Van Horn v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd., C.A. No. 2:07-1228
Ki-Yong Nam v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd., C.A. No. 2:07-1264
Young Teak Moon, et al. v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd., C.A. No. 2:07-1280
Leeva Chung v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd., C.A. No. 2:07-1281
Jong Su Kim v. Korean Air Lines, Co., Ltd., C.A. No. 2:07-1294
Steven Kim, et al. v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd., et al., C.A. No. 2:07-1313
Western District of Washington
Chae Kim v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd., et al., C.A. No. 2:07-1337 Michael Choi v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd., C.A. No. 2:07-1342
Jay Sohn v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd., C.A. No. 2:07-1351
John Papazian v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd., C.A. No. 2:07-1357
. The Panel has been notified of 42 potentially related actions pending in multiple federal districts. In light of the Panel's disposition of this docket, these actions will be treated as potential tag-along actions. See Rules 7.4 and 7.5, R.P.J.P.M.L., 199 F.R.D. 425, 435-36 (2001).