Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Miguel SECUNDINO-DIEGO, also known as Jose Secundino-Diego, also known as Juan Morales-Costilla, also known as Miguel Diego Secundino, also known as Miguel Secundino Diego, also known as Diego Miguel Secundino, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-03-16
Citations: 597 F. App'x 276
Docket Number: No. 14-20031
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Miguel SECUNDINO-DIEGO, also known as Jose Secundino-Diego, also known as Juan Morales-Costilla, also known as Miguel Diego Secundino, also known as Miguel Secundino Diego, also known as Diego Miguel Secundino, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 597
Pages: 276–276

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Miguel SECUNDINO-DIEGO, also known as Jose Secundino-Diego, also known as Juan Morales-Costilla, also known as Miguel Diego Secundino, also known as Miguel Secundino Diego, also known as Diego Miguel Secundino, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 14-20031
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 16, 2015.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Margaret Christina Ling, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Miguel Secundino-Diego has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Secundino-Diego has not filed a response and has been released from custody. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as frivolous, see 5th Cir. R. 42.2, and in part as moot. See United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis, 483 F.3d 381, 382-83 (5th Cir.2007).
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.