Case Name: COLLINS et al. v. DOBBINS et al.
Court: United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1952-03-13
Citations: 198 F.2d 763
Docket Number: No. 11015
Parties: COLLINS et al. v. DOBBINS et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 198
Pages: 763–763

Head Matter:
COLLINS et al. v. DOBBINS et al.
No. 11015.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued Jan. 14, 1952.
Decided March 13, 1952.
As Modified on Denial of Rehearing Sept. 15, 1952.
James A. Washington, Jr., Washington, D. C., with whom William S. Thompson, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellants.
Ambrose Shief, Jr., Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Wendell R. Shief, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appel-lees. Robert H. Campbell, Washington, D. C., also entered an appearance for appel-lees.
Before EDGERTON, CLARK, and PRETTYMAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The question is whether the alleged will of Marion E. Sabbs was duly executed. The trial judge thought there was "no doubt that she was not in a condition to execute a serious document, such as a will or deed or contract, with judgment and understanding" when she went through the motions of executing a will. The judge nevertheless directed a verdict sustaining the will because the decedent was able to "perform the physical act of signing her name" and because the will had been written for her, and she had orally expressed to one witness her approval of it, before she became mentally incompetent.
D.C.Code 1940, § 19-101 provides: "No will, testament, or codicil shall be good and effectual for any purpose whatever unless the person making the same be at the time of executing or acknowledging it of sound and disposing mind and capable of executing a valid deed or •contract." The judgment is therefore reversed and the case remanded for a new trial.