Case Name: Linda M. SANDS, Appellant, v. DEUTSCHE BANK, NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, Appellee.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2018-08-31
Citations: 251 So. 3d 359
Docket Number: Case No. 5D17-1213
Parties: Linda M. SANDS, Appellant,
v.
DEUTSCHE BANK, NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 251
Pages: 359–360

Head Matter:
Linda M. SANDS, Appellant,
v.
DEUTSCHE BANK, NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, Appellee.
Case No. 5D17-1213
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Opinion filed August 31, 2018
Patrick J. Deese, of Patrick J. Deese, P.A., Melbourne, for Appellant.
David Rosenberg, Cynthia L. Comras, and Jarrett Cooper, of Robertson, Anschutz & Schneid, P.L., Boca Raton, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Linda Sands, appeals the Final Judgment of Foreclosure entered in favor of Appellee, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company. Appellant alleges that Appellee lacked standing to foreclose and failed to present competent, substantial evidence to support the amount awarded in the Final Judgment. Appellee acknowledges that reversal in part is required because the amount awarded for attorney's fees was not supported by testimony from an attorney regarding the work done in this case. Therefore, we reverse the amount awarded in attorney's fees and remand with instructions to the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing to determine the reasonableness of the rate and time claimed. See Petrovsky v. HSBC Bank, USA, 185 So.3d 700, 701 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) (reversing portion of final judgment awarding attorney's fees where attorney's fees affidavit filed before trial was insufficient to support fee award and trial court failed to hold evidentiary hearing); Newman v. Newman, 121 So.3d 661, 662 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (reversing award of attorney's fees where court failed to hold hearing and allow appellant opportunity to dispute reasonableness of rate and time claimed). We affirm without discussion the remaining issues on appeal.
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED with instructions.
SAWAYA, ORFINGER, and WALLIS, JJ., concur.