Case Name: Janice Wolk GRENADIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James C. CLARK, Judge, in his Personal and Professional Capacity, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-02-01
Citations: 710 F. App'x 147
Docket Number: No. 17-1807
Parties: Janice Wolk GRENADIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James C. CLARK, Judge, in his Personal and Professional Capacity, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 710
Pages: 147–147

Head Matter:
Janice Wolk GRENADIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James C. CLARK, Judge, in his Personal and Professional Capacity, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 17-1807
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: January 30, 2018
Decided: February 1, 2018
Janice Wolk Grenadier, Appellant Pro Se. Margeaux Showell Serrano, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Ap-pellee.
Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Janice Wolk Grenadier appeals the district court's orders dismissing her suit against a state judge and denying various motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Grenadier v. Clark, No. 1:17-cv-00280-CMH-JFA (E.D. Va. Apr. 21, 2017; May 23, 2017; June 2 & 23, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts'and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED