Case Name: Jerry G. Spiegel et al., Appellants, v. Edward Gnadzinski, Doing Business as Jack's of All Trades, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1989-11-15
Citations: 155 A.D.2d 899
Docket Number: Appeal No. 1
Parties: Jerry G. Spiegel et al., Appellants, v Edward Gnadzinski, Doing Business as Jack’s of All Trades, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 155
Pages: 899–900

Head Matter:
Jerry G. Spiegel et al., Appellants, v Edward Gnadzinski, Doing Business as Jack’s of All Trades, Respondent.
(Appeal No. 1.)

Opinion:
— Order reversed on the law without costs and defendant's motion denied. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred by dismissing plaintiff's complaint because a question of fact exists concerning whether plaintiff suffers from an injury unknown at the time of the release or suffers merely from an unanticipated consequence of a known injury (see, Mangini v McClurg, 24 NY2d 556).
All concur, except Boomer and Lawton, JJ., who dissent and vote to affirm, in the following memorandum.