Case Name: Charles H. Holm, Appellant, v. Charles Gilchrist et al., Respondents
Court: Washington Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Washington
Decision Date: 1893-11-22
Citations: 7 Wash. 615
Docket Number: No. 951
Parties: Charles H. Holm, Appellant, v. Charles Gilchrist et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Washington Reports
Volume: 7
Pages: 615–615

Head Matter:
[No. 951.
Decided November 22, 1893.]
Charles H. Holm, Appellant, v. Charles Gilchrist et al., Respondents.
Appeal from Superior Court, Pacific County.
Fulton Bros, for appellant.
Arthur, Lindsay & King, for respondents.

Opinion:
Stiles, J.
This was an equity case, and upon the 4th day of January, 1893, the judge who tried the cause made a certificate to a statement of facts on appeal, stating that it contained all the testimony and objections and exceptions to the acceptance and rejection of testimony. This is precisely the state of facts passed upon in Clark-Harris Company v. Douthitt, 4 Wash. 405 (30 Pac. Rep.744).
The motion to strike must, therefore, prevail, and the appeal be dismissed.
Dunbar, C. J., and Hoyt, Scott and Anders, JJ., concur.