Case Name: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Sean M. Daley, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Wisconsin Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Wisconsin
Decision Date: 2006-03-16
Citations: 289 Wis. 2d 285
Docket Number: No. 2005AP48-CR
Parties: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Sean M. Daley, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Wisconsin Reports Second
Volume: 289
Pages: 285–285

Head Matter:
State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Sean M. Daley, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court
No. 2005AP48-CR.
Decided March 16, 2006.
2006 WI 25
(Also reported in 710 N.W.2d 904.)

Opinion:
The Court entered the following order on this date:
Defendant-appellant-petitioner, Sean M. Daley, has filed a petition for review. The State has filed a response that the court of appeals' decision in this case conflicts with binding precedent, State v. Barney, 213 Wis. 2d 344, 570 N.W.2d 731 (Ct. App. 1997). Having considered the petition for review and the State's response,
IT IS ORDERED the petition for review is granted, the court of appeals' decision is vacated and this matter is remanded to the court of appeals for further proceedings in light of Barney.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the proceedings in this court are held in abeyance pending remand, and while the appellate court conducts proceedings on remand, this court retains jurisdiction over the petition for review and the parties are instructed to inform this court of the outcome on remand.