Case Name: Charles Peeil, Appellant, v. August C. Hasselbush and Edward C. Tinker, Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1936-12-18
Citations: 249 A.D. 766
Docket Number: 
Parties: Charles Peeil, Appellant, v. August C. Hasselbush and Edward C. Tinker, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 249
Pages: 766–766

Head Matter:
Charles Peeil, Appellant, v. August C. Hasselbush and Edward C. Tinker, Respondents.

Opinion:
Order denying plaintiff's motion to strike out paragraph 2 of the amended answer and to strike out the defendants' entire amended answer and for summary judgment affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The undertaking on appeal, given pursuant to section 598 of the Civil Practice Act, is to be read in the light of section 1083-a of the Civil Practice Act, which last-mentioned section is invoked in the paragraph of the answer sought to be struck out by the plaintiff. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.