Case Name: Ewing O. COSSABOOM et al., Appellants, v. George A. EUBANKS et al., Members of Review Committee, etc., Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1951-10-18
Citations: 191 F.2d 855
Docket Number: No. 11293
Parties: Ewing O. COSSABOOM et al., Appellants, v. George A. EUBANKS et al., Members of Review Committee, etc., Appellees.
Judges: Before HICKS, Chief Judge, and MARTIN and McALLISTER, Circuit- Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 191
Pages: 855–855

Head Matter:
Ewing O. COSSABOOM et al., Appellants, v. George A. EUBANKS et al., Members of Review Committee, etc., Appellees.
No. 11293.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
Oct. 18, 1951.
Ewing O. Cossaboom, Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellant.
Claude P. Stephens, Lexington, Ky., Neil Brooks, Washington, D. C., for appellees.
Before HICKS, Chief Judge, and MARTIN and McALLISTER, Circuit- Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This appeal has been heard and considered on the record and on the oral arguments and 'briefs of the attorneys for the respective parties;
And the findings of fact of the District Court being supported by substantial evidence and not clearly erroneous; the conclusions of law being correctly drawn; and the opinion of the district judge in support of his conclusion that appellants are not entitled to the relief sought by them in this proceeding being found logical and sound;
The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.