Case Name: EDWIN R. FOX, Appellant, v. A. A. HUBBARD et al., Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1909-12-27
Citations: 157 Cal. 153
Docket Number: L. A. No. 2394
Parties: EDWIN R. FOX, Appellant, v. A. A. HUBBARD et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Reports
Volume: 157
Pages: 153–153

Head Matter:
[L. A. No. 2394.
In Bank.
December 27, 1909.]
EDWIN R. FOX, Appellant, v. A. A. HUBBARD et al., Respondents.
Case Affirmed.—Judgment in this case affirmed on the authority of Perry v. City of Los Angeles, ante, p. 146.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Walter Bordwell, Judge.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Edwin R. Fox, in pro. per., for Appellant.
Leslie R. Hewitt, City Attorney, and Lewis R. Works, and W. B. Mathews, for Respondents.

Opinion:
THE COURT.
The real question sought to be presented by this appeal is the same as that presented in the case of Perry v. City of Los Angeles, ante, p 146, [106 Pac. 400], this, day decided.
Por the reasons given in the opinion filed in that case the ruling sustaining the demurrers to plaintiff's complaint was correct.
The judgment is affirmed.