Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jorge JIMENEZ-CHICO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-12-11
Citations: 83 F. App'x 203
Docket Number: No. 03-10124, 03-10175
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jorge JIMENEZ-CHICO, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 83
Pages: 203–203

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jorge JIMENEZ-CHICO, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 03-10124, 03-10175.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 8, 2003.
Decided Dec. 11, 2003.
Bruce M. Ferg, DAG, Anne E. Mosher, Esq., USTU-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Richard B. Jones, Esq., Law Office of Richard B. Jones, Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before GOODWIN, WALLACE, and MCKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Jorge Jimenez-Chico appeals the district court's decision to sentence him to serve two terms of imprisonment consecutively rather than concurrently, following the Sentencing Guidelines. See U.S.S.G. § 7B1.3(f).
Because the district court considered the independent reports and the parties' arguments and decided in its discretion that the "direction of the Sentencing Commission" deserved "respect" in this particular case, we conclude that the district court was aware of its authority and was simply not persuaded to depart.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.