Case Name: George Mendes, Appellant, v. Caristo Construction Corp., Respondent, et al., Defendant; Caristo Construction Corp., Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Artistic Bronze Tablet Co., Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1959-04-09
Citations: 6 N.Y.2d 729
Docket Number: 
Parties: George Mendes, Appellant, v. Caristo Construction Corp., Respondent, et al., Defendant. Caristo Construction Corp., Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Artistic Bronze Tablet Co., Inc., Third-Party DefendantRespondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 6
Pages: 729–731

Head Matter:
George Mendes, Appellant, v. Caristo Construction Corp., Respondent, et al., Defendant. Caristo Construction Corp., Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Artistic Bronze Tablet Co., Inc., Third-Party DefendantRespondent.
Argued March 9, 1959;
decided April 9, 1959.
Bernard Meyer son and Paul P. Meltser for appellant.
Joseph P. Feury and Willaim J. Kermey for Caristo Construction Corp., respondent and third-party plaintiff-appellant.
Raymond C. Green, Harry Schechter, Milton L. Freedman and Charles G. Tierney for third-party defendant-respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Conway and Judges Desmond, Dye, Fxjld, Feoessel, Van Voobhis and Bubke.