Case Name: Henry HILL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1993-03-30
Citations: 849 S.W.2d 738
Docket Number: No. 61998
Parties: Henry HILL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before AHRENS, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 849
Pages: 738–739

Head Matter:
Henry HILL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. 61998.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
March 30, 1993.
Elizabeth Haines, St. Louis, for movant, appellant.
Michael J. Runzi, Office of Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent, respondent.
Before AHRENS, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after a Luleff hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).