Case Name: Willie George DIXON, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2018-08-16
Citations: 250 So. 3d 872
Docket Number: No. 1D17-3367
Parties: Willie George DIXON, Jr., Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 250
Pages: 872–873

Head Matter:
Willie George DIXON, Jr., Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D17-3367
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
August 16, 2018
Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Justin Foster Karpf, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Steven Edward Woods, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Willie George Dixon, Jr. raises three issues on appeal. The first, regarding the trial court's failure to conduct a proper competency determination, requires reversal-which the State concedes. The other two we find to be without merit. The remedy is a remand for the trial court to conduct a nunc pro tunc competency evaluation; if one cannot be done, Dixon must receive a new trial. See Brooks v. State , 180 So.3d 1094, 1095 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015).
Makar, Winokur, and Winsor, JJ., concur.