Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Miguel CARLOS-BANUELOS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-03-22
Citations: 7 F. App'x 600
Docket Number: No. 99-50778; D.C. No. CR-99-00354-TJW
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Miguel CARLOS-BANUELOS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WALLACE, SILVERMAN and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 7
Pages: 600–601

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Miguel CARLOS-BANUELOS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 99-50778. D.C. No. CR-99-00354-TJW.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 12, 2001
Decided March 22, 2001.
Before WALLACE, SILVERMAN and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Jose Miguel Carlos-Banuelos appeals his conviction and 37-month sentence inl posed following a guilty plea to illegal reentry by a previously deported alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We dismiss.
As part of his plea, Carlos-Banuelos "waive[d], to the full extent of the law, any right to appeal or collaterally attack the conviction and sentence, including any restitution order, unless the Court imposes a custodial sentence greater than the high end of the guideline range based on an adjusted offense level of 21." Because the district court imposed the sentence based on an adjusted offense level of 20, and Carlos-Banuelos does not contend that the waiver of his right to appeal was unknowing or involuntary, the appeal waiver is enforceable. United States v. Navarro-Botello, 912 F.2d 318, 319 (9th Cir.1990) (concluding that if waiver is made voluntarily and knowingly, it is enforceable and does not violated due process or public policy).
DISMISSED.
. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.