Case Name: In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Intermediate Account of Proceedings of Central Hanover Bank and Trust Company, as Executor of and Trustee under the Last Will and Testament of Robert E. Bullinger, Deceased. Elizabeth Lyman Tremaine, Appellant; Central Hanover Bank and Trust Company, as Executor and Trustee, etc., and Others, Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1931-07
Citations: 234 A.D. 624
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Intermediate Account of Proceedings of Central Hanover Bank and Trust Company, as Executor of and Trustee under the Last Will and Testament of Robert E. Bullinger, Deceased. Elizabeth Lyman Tremaine, Appellant; Central Hanover Bank and Trust Company, as Executor and Trustee, etc., and Others, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 234
Pages: 624–625

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Intermediate Account of Proceedings of Central Hanover Bank and Trust Company, as Executor of and Trustee under the Last Will and Testament of Robert E. Bullinger, Deceased. Elizabeth Lyman Tremaine, Appellant; Central Hanover Bank and Trust Company, as Executor and Trustee, etc., and Others, Respondents.

Opinion:
Decree of the Surrogate's Court of Queens county, in so far as appealed from, affirmed, with costs to each of the respondents filing briefs, payable out of the estate. Carswell, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., concurs to the extent that the accumulated income is to be a part of the residuary estate but dissents upon the ground that the time for the distribution of the residuary estate has not arrived; Hagarty, J., dissents, with the following memorandum: In view of the accumulation of income in violation of the statute, a construction disposing of the entire income should be adopted if possible. In my opinion such a con struction may be placed upon the will. (Crawford v. Dexter, 178 App. Div. 764; Bloodgood v. Lewis, 209 N. Y. 95.)