Case Name: Donald M. BOYSAW, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael FRIEDMAN; Howard R. Udell; Paul Goldenheim, Defendants-Appellees, and Purdue Pharma, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-04-06
Citations: 320 F. App'x 178
Docket Number: No. 08-2184
Parties: Donald M. BOYSAW, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael FRIEDMAN; Howard R. Udell; Paul Goldenheim, Defendants-Appellees, and Purdue Pharma, Defendant.
Judges: Before GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 320
Pages: 178–178

Head Matter:
Donald M. BOYSAW, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael FRIEDMAN; Howard R. Udell; Paul Goldenheim, Defendants-Appellees, and Purdue Pharma, Defendant.
No. 08-2184.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 26, 2009.
Decided: April 6, 2009.
Donald M. Boysaw, Appellant Pro Se. Cameron Scott Bell, William W. Eskridge, Penn, Stuart & Eskridge, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Donald M. Boysaw appeals the district court's order granting Defendants' motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Boysaw v. Friedman, No. 1:07-cv-00079-jpj-pms, 2008 WL 4452650 (W.D.Va. Sept. 30, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.