Case Name: Carl HARNICK, Appellant, v. Ethel HARNICK, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1984-01-31
Citations: 444 So. 2d 87
Docket Number: No. 83-1340
Parties: Carl HARNICK, Appellant, v. Ethel HARNICK, Appellee.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 444
Pages: 87–87

Head Matter:
Carl HARNICK, Appellant, v. Ethel HARNICK, Appellee.
No. 83-1340.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan. 31, 1984.
Keith, Mack, Lewis & Allison and R. Hugh Lumpkin, Miami, for appellant.
Burnett Roth, Miami Beach, for appellee.
Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
A presumption of undue influence did not arise where the daughter, beneficiary of inter-vivos gifts and beneficiary under a will, although occupying a confidential relationship with the testator, was not shown to have actively procured the will or the gifts. See In re Estate of Carpenter, 253 So.2d 697 (Fla.1971); In re Estate of Smith, 212 So.2d 74 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968).
Affirmed.