Case Name: Jesse SKINNER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1985-05-30
Citations: 470 So. 2d 702
Docket Number: No. 65510
Parties: Jesse SKINNER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: BOYD, C.J., and ADKINS, OVERTON, ALDERMAN, McDONALD, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 470
Pages: 702–702

Head Matter:
Jesse SKINNER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 65510.
Supreme Court of Florida.
May 30, 1985.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender and Lucinda H. Young, Asst. Public Defender, Seventh Judicial Circuit, Daytona Beach, for petitioner.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Kenneth McLaughlin and Belle B. Turner, Asst. At-tys. Gen., Daytona Beach, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We accepted jurisdiction because of direct and express conflict between the case here, Skinner v. State, 450 So.2d 595 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), and Golden v. State, 120 So.2d 651 (Fla. 1st DCA 1960). Since that time the First District Court of Appeal has receded from Golden and expressly adopted the reasoning of the case here, Skinner, and Ballard v. State, 447 So.2d 1040 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). See Carter v. State, 469 So.2d 775 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984), panel decision adopted by court en banc April 25, 1985. The conflict having been resolved while this cause has been pending, we exercise our discretion to decline to proceed further and deny review.
It is so ordered.
BOYD, C.J., and ADKINS, OVERTON, ALDERMAN, McDONALD, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur.