Case Name: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Russo
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1986-01-02
Citations: 21 Ohio St. 3d 15
Docket Number: D.D. No. 85-24
Parties: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Russo.
Judges: Celebrezze, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 21
Pages: 15–17

Head Matter:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Russo.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Russo (1986), 21 Ohio St. 3d 15.]
(D.D. No. 85-24
Decided January 2, 1986.)
Angelo J. Gagliardo, disciplinary counsel, and Mark H. Aultman, for relator.
Paul H. Hentemann and Donald J. Huffman, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Having reviewed the record, findings of fact and conclusions of law of the board, this court determines that there are ample facts to justify the board's findings that Russo violated DR 6-101(A)(3); 7-101(A)(l), (2) and (3); 7-102(A)(4), (5) and (6); 9-102(A) and (B); and 1-102(A)(3), (4), (5) and (6).
Accordingly, it is the judgment of this court that Russo be permanently disbarred from the practice of law.
Judgment accordingly.
Celebrezze, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.