Case Name: Akio KAWASHIMA; Fusako Kawashima, Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent; Akio Kawashima; Fusako Kawashima, aka Fusako Nakajima, Petitioners, v. Eric H. Holder Jr., Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-09-18
Citations: 615 F.3d 1043
Docket Number: Nos. 04-74313, 05-74408
Parties: Akio KAWASHIMA; Fusako Kawashima, Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. Akio Kawashima; Fusako Kawashima, aka Fusako Nakajima, Petitioners, v. Eric H. Holder Jr.,* Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: DIARMUID F. O’SCANNLAIN, EDWARD LEAVY, and CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 615
Pages: 1043–1058

Head Matter:
Akio KAWASHIMA; Fusako Kawashima, Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. Akio Kawashima; Fusako Kawashima, aka Fusako Nakajima, Petitioners, v. Eric H. Holder Jr.,* Attorney General, Respondent.
Nos. 04-74313, 05-74408.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Feb. 8, 2007.
Opinion Filed Sept. 18, 2007.
Opinion Withdrawn; New Opinion Filed July 1, 2008.
Opinion Withdrawn; New Opinion Filed Jan. 27, 2010.
Opinion Withdrawn; New Opinion Filed Aug. 4, 2010.
Jenny C. Lin-Alva and Edward O.C. Ord, Ord & Norman, San Francisco, CA, filed a supplemental brief on behalf of the petitioners. Thomas J. Whalen, Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, Washington, D.C., was also on the brief.
Nancy Freedman, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington D.C., argued the cause for the respondent. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division, Washington, D.C., M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Office of Immigration Litigation, and James A. Hunolt, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, were also on the brief.
Jennifer J. Keeney, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, D.C., filed a supplemental brief on behalf of the respondent. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division, Washington, D.C., and Donald E. Keener, Deputy Director, Office of Immigration Litigation, were also on the brief.
Stephen W. Manning, American Immigration Lawyers Association, Portland, OR, filed a brief on behalf of amicus curiae the American Immigration Lawyers Association and in support of the petitioners’ supplemental brief. Jessica M. Boell, American Immigration Lawyers Association, Jennifer M. Rotman, American Immigration Lawyers Association, and Andrew Knapp, American Immigration Lawyers Association, were also on the brief.
Jenny C. Lin-Alva, Ord & Norman, LLC, San Francisco, CA, filed a petition for rehearing with a suggestion for rehearing and a reply on behalf of the petitioners. Edward O.C. Ord, Ord & Norman, LLC, Thomas J. Whalen, Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, Washington, D.C., and Mark Johnston, Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, were also on the petition and the reply.
Jennifer J. Keeney, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, D.C., filed a brief opposing rehearing on behalf of the respondent. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division, Washington, D.C., Donald E. Keener, Deputy Director, Office of Immigration Litigation, Matthew B. George, Trial Attorney, Office of Immigration Litigation, and Katherine A. Smith, Trial Attorney, Office of Immigration Litigation, were also on the brief.
Before: DIARMUID F. O’SCANNLAIN, EDWARD LEAVY, and CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Eric H. Holder Jr. is substituted for his predecessor Michael B. Mukasey as Attorney General of the United States. Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

Opinion:
Dissent to Order by Judge GRABER; Opinion by Judge O'SCANNLAIN.
ORDER
The opinion filed in this case on January 27, 2010, and published at 593 F.3d 979, is withdrawn. A new opinion is filed contemporaneously with the filing of this order.
The panel has voted unanimously to deny the petition for rehearing. Judges O'Scannlain and Callahan have voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Leavy has so recommended.
The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc, and the matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
The petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing or petitions for rehearing en banc will be entertained.