Case Name: In the Matter of the Arbitration between The Perkins & Will Partnership, Appellant-Respondent, and Syska and Hennessy et al., Respondents-Appellants; American Arbitration Association, Respondent; In the Matter of the Arbitration between Walter Kidde Constructors, Inc., Respondent, and Mount Sinai Hospital of Hartford, Connecticut, et al., Respondents, and The Perkins & Will Partnership, Appellant-Respondent; In the Matter of the Arbitration between Garfinkel, Marenberg & Associates, Appellant-Respondent, and The Perkins & Will Partnership, Respondent-Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1976-05-13
Citations: 39 N.Y.2d 828
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Arbitration between The Perkins & Will Partnership, Appellant-Respondent, and Syska and Hennessy et al., Respondents-Appellants; American Arbitration Association, Respondent. In the Matter of the Arbitration between Walter Kidde Constructors, Inc., Respondent, and Mount Sinai Hospital of Hartford, Connecticut, et al., Respondents, and The Perkins & Will Partnership, Appellant-Respondent. In the Matter of the Arbitration between Garfinkel, Marenberg & Associates, Appellant-Respondent, and The Perkins & Will Partnership, Respondent-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 39
Pages: 828–829

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Arbitration between The Perkins & Will Partnership, Appellant-Respondent, and Syska and Hennessy et al., Respondents-Appellants; American Arbitration Association, Respondent. In the Matter of the Arbitration between Walter Kidde Constructors, Inc., Respondent, and Mount Sinai Hospital of Hartford, Connecticut, et al., Respondents, and The Perkins & Will Partnership, Appellant-Respondent. In the Matter of the Arbitration between Garfinkel, Marenberg & Associates, Appellant-Respondent, and The Perkins & Will Partnership, Respondent-Appellant.
Submitted March 1, 1976;
decided May 13, 1976
Richard Bakalor and Joseph A. Bergadano for motion.
Stephen H. Kinney, Jr., opposed.

Opinion:
On the court's own motion, appeals by Syska and Hennessy and by Garfinkel, Marenberg & Associates dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that said appellants are not aggrieved by the modification at the Appellate Division (CPLR 5601, subd [a], par [iii]).
Motion to consolidate appeals dismissed as academic.
Motion for a stay of arbitration denied.