Case Name: Lacey S. MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-11-26
Citations: 489 F. App'x 713
Docket Number: No. 12-1860
Parties: Lacey S. MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 489
Pages: 713–713

Head Matter:
Lacey S. MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 12-1860.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 20, 2012.
Decided: Nov. 26, 2012.
Lacey S. Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. Alex Gordon, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Lacey S. Mitchell appeals the magistrate judge's order affirming the Commissioner's denial of disability insurance benefits. We must uphold the decision to deny benefits if the decision is supported by substantial evidence and the correct law was applied. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2006); Johnson v. Barnhart, 434 F.3d 650, 653 (4th Cir.2005) (per curiam). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Mitchell v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec., No. 1:11-cv-00723-BPG (D. Md. June 14, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
The parties consented to proceeding before a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (2006).