Case Name: Verona Construction Co., Inc. v. Lower Merion Township, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1964-03-17
Citations: 413 Pa. 619
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 126
Parties: Verona Construction Co., Inc. v. Lower Merion Township, Appellant.
Judges: Before Bell, C. J., Musmanno, Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O’Brien and Roberts, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 413
Pages: 619–625

Head Matter:
Verona Construction Co., Inc. v. Lower Merion Township, Appellant.
Argued January 22, 1964.
Before Bell, C. J., Musmanno, Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O’Brien and Roberts, JJ.
March 17, 1964:
Edmund B. Spaeth, Jr., with Mm John E. Forsythe, Township Solicitor, and Wright, Spencer, Manning <£ Sagendorph, .for appellant.
Justin Gr. Duryea, with him Duryea & Kuen, for appellee. >

Opinion:
Opinion
Per Curiam,
The Verona Construction Co., Inc., instituted an action of assumpsit, against Lower Merion Township in- Montgomery County, to recover a balance claimed tó bé due as the result' of the construction of branch and intercepting sewers and a force main line for the township. Verona collected 90% of the money for the work it performed. Payment of the remaining 10% was withheld by the defendant township on the basis that because of deficiencies in the plaintiff's work another contractor, Abbonizio & Sons, Inc., had to be engaged to complete Verona's work.
Th¿ township further claimed that the plaintiff had not furnished a release of liens, had not settled all claims for damages and had not obtained a final written certification from the engineer as required by the contract before final payment could be made.
A. stipulation was entered into between the parties whereby (1) the plaintiff's claim was amended from $50,758.48 to $41,072.58 (rounded out to $41,000-); (2) it. was agreed that the township had paid Abbonizio- $26,453.13 to correct and/or complete, plaintiff's, work so that if there had been a trial a jury's verdict in favor of plaintiff would have been $41,000 less $26,453.13 or $14,546.87, plus interest of $5,040, or a total verdict of $19,586.87.
The stipulation then provided that "The cause shall forthwith be argued . . . upon the following issues . . .
"Is written acceptance of the plaintiff's [Verona's] work by the Engineer within the terms of the contract a condition precedent to the plaintiff's recovery?
"If so, does the letter of March 20, 1957, fulfill the said condition precedent?"
The issues being so limited, it was not necessary for the court below to introduce the issue of plaintiff's substantial performance and we thus need not make any holding with respect thereto.
Article 14(f) of the contract between the plaintiff and the defendant provided: "(f) Upon completion of all work whatsoever required, the Engineer shall file a written certificate, with the Owner and with the Contractor, as to the entire amount of work performed and compensation earned by the contractor. . . . Within thirty days after the filing of such certificate of completion . . . the Owner shall pay to the Contractor the amount therein stated . . . which [payment] is throughout this contract called the Final Payment."
The plaintiff contends that there was such certification of completion by reason of the Engineer's letter of March 20, 1957, which said:
"Re: Engineer's certificate of completion of sewers and force main under contract No. 3
"Dear Sir [the Township's Manager] :
"We hereby certify the construction of sanitary sewers and force main constructed under contract No. 3 [stating the streets where the sewers were installed] as constructed by Verona Construction Company, Inc! under contract with the Commissioners of Lower Merion Township, dated November 3, 1954, and completed by N. Abbonizio & Sons under Lower Merion Township Purchase Order No. 227 (1956), is completed in accordance with the plans, specifications and contract documents.
"We recommend the Commissioners accept the contract as completed as of March 20, 1957, and incorporate the sanitary sewers and force main constructed under this contract into the sanitary sewer system of Lower Merion Township.
Very truly yours,
s/B. A. F.
For Albright & Friel, Inc."
The defendant maintains that this letter is not a certification of the completion of plaintiff's work but only of Abbonizio's work. We do not agree. A careful reading of the letter leaves no doubt that it constituted an acceptance of the work "as constructed by Verona Construction Company, Inc., under contract with the Commissioners of Lower Merion Township, dated November 3, 1954, and completed by N. Abbonizio & Sons . . The work certified is thus not only that of Abbonizio's but of the plaintiff's as well. It expressly recognizes plaintiff's work under the contract, and constitutes a certification of the completion of,the entire construction job, including inevitably that portion performed by the plaintiff.
Abbonizio has received payment for that portion of the work referred to in the certification, and the plaintiff is entitled to receive the |19,586.87 which the defendant admitted would be due it if proper certification of the completion of its work was found to exist. Paragraph GC29 of the Standard Specifications made a part of the contract between the parties provides that the Engineer shall examine the entire work after completion, and "If such work is found to comply fully with the requirements of the contract, it will be accepted, and final payment thereof will be made in accordance with the contract." The March 20, 1957 letter certifies the sewers and force main "as construct-ted by Verona Construction" under the contract in question, "and completed by N. Abbonizio & Sons" to be "completed in accordance with the plans, specifications and contract documents." The letter recommends acceptance by the Commissioners of the entire work, including that portion performed by plaintiff.
Under all these circumstances there can be no reason in law, logic or justice why the plaintiff should not receive the final payment due it for its work. Since it is agreed that the amounts paid Abbonizio to finish plaintiff's work should be deducted from the amount due plaintiff, the plaintiff is accordingly entitled to $19,586.87, the judgment properly entered by the Court below.
Judgment affirmed.