Case Name: Charles YOUNG, Deceased, Arlene Young, Widow v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (ZINC CORPORATION OF AMERICA) Appeal of Zinc Corporation of America
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2007-05-31
Citations: 592 Pa. 40
Docket Number: Appeal No. 41 WAP 2006
Parties: Charles YOUNG, Deceased, Arlene Young, Widow v. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (ZINC CORPORATION OF AMERICA) Appeal of Zinc Corporation of America.
Judges: BEFORE: CAPPY, C.J., and CASTILLE, SAYLOR, EAKIN, BAER and BALDWIN, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 592
Pages: 40–41

Head Matter:
922 A.2d 891
Charles YOUNG, Deceased, Arlene Young, Widow v. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (ZINC CORPORATION OF AMERICA) Appeal of Zinc Corporation of America.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued March 5, 2007.
Decided May 31, 2007.
Jeanette Hsin Ho, Esq., Louis C. Long, Esq., Pietragallo, Bosick & Gordon, L.L.P., Pittsburgh, for Zinc Corporation of America.
Amber Marie Kenger, Esq., Richard C. Lengler, Esq., for Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board.
Daniel King Bricmont, Esq., Caroselli, Beachler, McTiernan & Conboy, L.L.C., Pittsburgh, for Charles Young.
Thomas W. Corbett, Esq., Harrisburg, for Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
BEFORE: CAPPY, C.J., and CASTILLE, SAYLOR, EAKIN, BAER and BALDWIN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The Order of the Commonwealth Court is affirmed with the caveat that the Commonwealth Court shall modify its Order to specify that the calculation and award of benefits should not include any award for lifetime claim benefits as claimant conceded that she was discontinuing her claim for lifetime benefits.
Justice SAYLOR files a concurring statement in which Justice BALDWIN joins.