Case Name: Claire Topper, Appellant, v. Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1979-03-22
Citations: 46 N.Y.2d 974
Docket Number: 
Parties: Claire Topper, Appellant, v Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 46
Pages: 974–975

Head Matter:
Claire Topper, Appellant, v Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, Respondent.
Argued February 13, 1979;
decided March 22, 1979
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
jBradley B. Davis for appellant.
Michael L. B. Kaplan, Samuel C. Cantor, David G. O’Brien and Patrick W. Guy for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (62 AD2d 932). In addition, the record does not support the contention that respondent made misleading representations to appellant regarding her entitlement to receive benefits under the salary continuation plan.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg.