Case Name: WALTER SCHENBERGER vs. MAE C. SCHENBERGER
Court: Connecticut Superior Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1945-02-02
Citations: 13 Conn. Supp. 200
Docket Number: File No. 65023
Parties: WALTER SCHENBERGER vs. MAE C. SCHENBERGER
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Supplement
Volume: 13
Pages: 200–200

Head Matter:
WALTER SCHENBERGER vs. MAE C. SCHENBERGER
Superior Court New Haven County
File No. 65023
MEMORANDUM FILED FEBRUARY 2, 1945.
Walter J. McCarthy, of New Haven, for the Plaintiff.
John R. Thim, of New Haven, for the Defendant.

Opinion:
WYNNE, J.
The arguments on the pending motion disclosed that it is the plaintiff's claim that a part of the intolerable cruelty consisted of defendant's refusal to have marital rela' tions and that there was no physical reason for such refusal. Defendant's counsel admitted there was no physical reason that would be claimed. This certainly disposes of any reason for the unusual request. There is no need to consider the propriety in a proper case. In view of the statement made in -court, the motion is denied.