Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Brian D. JACKSON, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-05-27
Citations: 105 S.W.3d 872
Docket Number: No. ED 81624
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Brian D. JACKSON, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before PAUL J. SIMON, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., J. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 105
Pages: 872–873

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Brian D. JACKSON, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 81624.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
May 27, 2003.
John Munson Morris, III, Assistant Attorney General, Linda Lemke, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Nancy A. McKerrow, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Before PAUL J. SIMON, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., J. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals from the judgment entered after a bench trial finding him guilty of felony stealing, in violation of Section 570.030 RSMo (Cum.Supp.1998); forcible rape, in violation of Section 566.030 RSMo (Cum.Supp.1998); felonious restraint, in violation of Section 565.120 RSMo (1994); endangering the welfare of the child, in violation of Section 568.045 RSMo (Cum.Supp.1998); kidnapping, in violation of Section 565.110 RSMo (1994); armed criminal action, in violation of Sec tion 571.015 RSMo (1994); and felonious restraint, in violation of Section 565.120 RSMo (1994). The trial court found defendant to be a prior and persistent offender and sentenced him to consecutive terms of seven years imprisonment on the felony stealing and two felonious restraint counts, twenty years on the forcible rape and armed criminal action counts, five years on the endangerment count, and fifteen years on the kidnapping count, for a total of eighty-one years.
No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).