Case Name: Ruben GONZALEZ VALLEJO; et al., Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-07-03
Citations: 187 F. App'x 783
Docket Number: No. 05-71285
Parties: Ruben GONZALEZ VALLEJO; et al., Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: PREGERSON, TALLMAN and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 187
Pages: 783–783

Head Matter:
Ruben GONZALEZ VALLEJO; et al., Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 05-71285.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
July 3, 2006.
Moisés A. Aviles, Esq., Aviles & Associates, San Bernardino, CA, for Petitioners.
Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Marshall Tamor Golding, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Offiee of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: PREGERSON, TALLMAN and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Respondent's opposed "motion for summary denial of review petition" is construed as a motion to dismiss. Petitioners have failed to raise a colorable constitutional claim to invoke our jurisdiction over this petition for review. See Torres-Aguilar v. INS, 246 F.3d 1267, 1271 (9th Cir.2001); see also Ramirez-Perez v. Ashcroft, 336 F.3d 1001 (9th Cir.2003). Accordingly, respondent's motion to dismiss this petition is granted. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D); Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir.2003).
DISMISSED.