Case Name: The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Boaz SUSMAN, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1982-02-23
Citations: 412 So. 2d 866
Docket Number: No. 80-1127
Parties: The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Boaz SUSMAN, Appellee.
Judges: Before HUBBART, C. J., and FERGUSON, J., and MELVIN, WOODROW M. (Retired), Associate Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 412
Pages: 866–867

Head Matter:
The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Boaz SUSMAN, Appellee.
No. 80-1127.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 23, 1982.
Rehearing Denied May 5, 1982.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Calvin L. Fox, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.
John H. Lipinski, Miami, for appellee.
Before HUBBART, C. J., and FERGUSON, J., and MELVIN, WOODROW M. (Retired), Associate Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The State of Florida has perfected its appeal from an order entered in the Circuit Court of Dade County that dismissed a count contained in an information filed against the appellee. In entering such order, the trial court held that Section 893.-135, Florida Statutes was unconstitutional.
The order appealed from is reversed upon the authority of State v. Benitez, 395 So.2d 514 (Fla.1981); State v. Yu, 400 So.2d 762 (Fla.1981); State v. Werner, 402 So.2d 386 (Fla.1981); Stone v. State, 402 So.2d 1330 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).
For the foregoing reasons, the trial court is directed to proceed in harmony with the views herein expressed.