Case Name: Michael J. WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. D. RUDGERS; et al., Defendants- Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-02-14
Citations: 56 F. App'x 368
Docket Number: No. 02-55628; D.C. No. CV-00-00500-AHS
Parties: Michael J. WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. D. RUDGERS; et al., Defendants— Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 56
Pages: 368–369

Head Matter:
Michael J. WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. D. RUDGERS; et al., Defendants— Appellees.
No. 02-55628.
D.C. No. CV-00-00500-AHS.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 10, 2003.
Decided Feb. 14, 2003.
Before LEAVY, FERNANDEZ and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Michael Wilson, California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to medical needs.
We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dis trict court's grant of summary judgment, Sorrels v. McKee, 290 F.3d 965, 969 (9th Cir.2002), and we affirm.
The district court properly granted summary judgment because Wilson failed to exhaust administrative remedies by not pursuing his complaint through all four stages of the grievance procedure as required by the California Department of Corrections. See Booth v. Chumer, 532 U.S. 731, 734, 121 S.Ct. 1819, 149 L.Ed.2d 958 (2001) (requiring exhaustion prior to filing suit in federal court).
We deny all pending motions.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.