Case Name: Rajiv KHURANA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INNOVATIVE HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS, INC.; Karry Teel; Carl Holden; William Malone; I.H.S. River Region Hospital of Vacherie, La., Inc., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1999-01-11
Citations: 164 F.3d 900
Docket Number: No. 96-30525
Parties: Rajiv KHURANA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INNOVATIVE HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS, INC.; Karry Teel; Carl Holden; William Malone; I.H.S. River Region Hospital of Vacherie, La., Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WIENER and PARKER, Circuit Judges, and LITTLE, Chief District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 164
Pages: 900–901

Head Matter:
Rajiv KHURANA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INNOVATIVE HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS, INC.; Karry Teel; Carl Holden; William Malone; I.H.S. River Region Hospital of Vacherie, La., Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 96-30525.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Jan. 11, 1999.
James Alan Williams, McElwee, Williams & Peters, L.L.C., Gretna, LA, Robert Elton Arceneaux, Barham & Arceneaux, New Orleans, LA, for Khurana.
Frank E. Massengale, Karen Kaler Whitfield, Massengale & Debruhl, New Orleans, LA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Frank H. Walk, Jr., New Orleans, LA, pro se.
Edward P. Gothard, Metairie, LA, pro se.
Frederick M. Stoller, McCloskey, Langen-stein & Stoller, New Orleans, LA, pro se.
Before WIENER and PARKER, Circuit Judges, and LITTLE, Chief District Judge.
Chief Judge of the Western District of Louisiana, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
PER CURIAM:
In accordance with the Order of the Supreme Court of the United States, this case is dismissed as moot. See Teel v. Khurana, — U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 442, 142 L.Ed.2d 442 (1998).
DISMISSED AS MOOT.