Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Dean Simonds, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1989-03-23
Citations: 73 N.Y.2d 945
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dean Simonds, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 73
Pages: 945–947

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dean Simonds, Appellant.
Argued February 16, 1989;
decided March 23, 1989
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Howard Friedman and Philip L. Weinstein for appellant.
Paul T. Gentile, District Attorney (Allen M. Hecht and Susan L. Valle of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed. Defendant's argument with respect to an alleged Rosario (People v Rosario, 9 NY2d 286) violation, never having been raised in the trial court or the Appellate Division, is unpreserved for our review (People v Poole, 48 NY2d 144, 149-150), and his other arguments are without merit.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.