Case Name: Estate of EDGAR LAURENCE DOW, Deceased. MAXINE PATRICIA HUTCHINSON, Respondent, v. MAXINE B. DOW, Individually and as Administratrix With the Will Annexed, etc., Appellants
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1956-04-02
Citations: 140 Cal. App. 2d 957
Docket Number: Civ. No. 17057
Parties: Estate of EDGAR LAURENCE DOW, Deceased. MAXINE PATRICIA HUTCHINSON, Respondent, v. MAXINE B. DOW, Individually and as Administratrix With the Will Annexed, etc., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports, Second Series
Volume: 140
Pages: 957–957

Head Matter:
297 P.2d 38]
[Civ. No. 17057.
First Dist., Div. One.
Apr. 2, 1956.]
Estate of EDGAR LAURENCE DOW, Deceased. MAXINE PATRICIA HUTCHINSON, Respondent, v. MAXINE B. DOW, Individually and as Administratrix With the Will Annexed, etc., Appellants.
J. Oscar Goldstein, P. M. Barceloux, J. Burton Goldstein, Goldstein, Barceloux & Goldstein, Erskine, Erskine & Tulley and Morris Erskine II, for Appellants.
William A. White and Hutchinson & Quattrin for Respondent.

Opinion:
WOOD (Fred B.), J.
The appeal herein is from an order of September 7, 1955, which is described in our opinion this day filed in Dow v. Superior Court, No. 1 Civil 16939, ante, p. 399 [297 P.2d 30].
Respondent herein has moved to dismiss the appeal upon the asserted ground that the order in question is nonappealable. We hold that those provisions of the order which direct the payment of money or the distribution of property are appealable for the reasons stated in our opinion in No. 16939.
The motion to dismiss the appeal is denied.
Peters, P. J., and Bray, J., concurred.
Respondent's petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied May 29, 1956.