Case Name: Solar Electric Co.'s Appeal
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1927-06-25
Citations: 290 Pa. 372
Docket Number: No. 2; Appeal, No. 86
Parties: Solar Electric Co.'s Appeal
Judges: Before Moschzisker, C. J., Frazer, Walking, Simpson, Kephart, Sadler and Schaffer, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 290
Pages: 372–373

Head Matter:
Solar Electric Co.'s Appeal
(No. 2).
Argued April 11, 1927.
Before Moschzisker, C. J., Frazer, Walking, Simpson, Kephart, Sadler and Schaffer, JJ.
Raymond E. Brown, with him Charles J. Margiotti, W. M. Gillespie and Brooks, English & Quinn, for appellant.
W. N. Conrad, for appellee.
June 25, 1927.:

Opinion:
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Schaffer,
This is a companion appeal to the Solar Electric Co.'s Appeal (No. 1), supra, page 156; in it the appellant sought to raise the question of the jurisdiction of the court below by petition under the Act of March 5, 1925, P. L. 23; it did not do so however until the case had proceeded to Anal hearing. The question of jurisdiction under this act must be raised preliminarily and therefore appellant's petition' came too late: Wilson v. Garland, 287 Pa. 291. The course prescribed by the act must be pursued: Stamper v. Kogelschatz, 289 Pa. 94.
It follows that this appeal must be and it accordingly is dismissed at the cost of the appellant.