Case Name: ROBERT AKRIDGE et al, Petitioners, v. CUPP et al, Respondents
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1978-11-29
Citations: 284 Or. 423
Docket Number: TC 91108, CA 8080, SC 25656
Parties: ROBERT AKRIDGE et al, Petitioners, v. CUPP et al, Respondents.
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 284
Pages: 423–425

Head Matter:
On petitioners’ motion for attorney fees filed August 10,
motion denied November 29, 1978
ROBERT AKRIDGE et al, Petitioners, v. CUPP et al, Respondents.
(TC 91108, CA 8080, SC 25656)
587 P2d 461
Robert W. Donaldson, Salem, for the motion.
Catherine Allan, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, James A. Redden, Attorney General, and Walter L. Barrie, Solicitor General, contra.
PER CURIAM.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Petitioners in these habeas corpus proceedings, consolidated for appeal and review, now move this court for an order allowing attorney fees and costs incurred in the presentation of their petition for review. Today's decision in Penrod v. Cupp and Brown v. Cupp, 284 Or 417, 587 P2d 96 (1978), holds that there is no statutory basis for such an order by this court. The motion is denied.