Case Name: Donald W. McINTOSH, Frances M. Farina, Robert W. Geyer, S. Nash, Edith Friedman and Herbert Spahn, and other persons similarly situated, Appellants, v. HARBOUR CLUB VILLAS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, Shores Condominium Association, Inc., and Quayside Associates, Ltd., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1985-05-14
Citations: 468 So. 2d 1075
Docket Number: No. 84-1162
Parties: Donald W. McINTOSH, Frances M. Farina, Robert W. Geyer, S. Nash, Edith Friedman and Herbert Spahn, and other persons similarly situated, Appellants, v. HARBOUR CLUB VILLAS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, Shores Condominium Association, Inc., and Quayside Associates, Ltd., Appellees.
Judges: Before HENDRY, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 468
Pages: 1075–1081

Head Matter:
Donald W. McINTOSH, Frances M. Farina, Robert W. Geyer, S. Nash, Edith Friedman and Herbert Spahn, and other persons similarly situated, Appellants, v. HARBOUR CLUB VILLAS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, Shores Condominium Association, Inc., and Quayside Associates, Ltd., Appellees.
No. 84-1162.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 14, 1985.
Ress, Gomez, Rosenberg & Howland and Sheldon Rosenberg, North Miami, for appellants.
Lapidus & Stettin and Richard L. Lapi-dus, Miami, for appellees.
Before HENDRY, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This appeal questions the correctness of a summary final judgment rendered in favor of the appellees/defendants in an action in which appellants sought damages because they were denied the right to participate in the proceeds of a three million dollar settlement of a zoning case in which appellants claim to be parties in interest.
Upon consideration of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel, we have concluded that material issues of fact remain, precluding the entry of a final summary judgment. Accordingly, the judgment appealed is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.
Reversed and remanded.
. For further facts concerning this litigation, see: Brynwood Condominium, Inc. v. Harbour Club Villas Condominium Association, 436 So.2d 1080 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Williams, Salomon, Kanner, Damian, Weissler & Brooks v. Harbour Club Villas Condominium Association, Inc., 436 So.2d 233 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); McIntosh v. Harbour Club Villas Condominium Association, 421 So.2d 10 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Quayside Associates, Ltd. v. Harbour Club Villas Condominium Association, Inc., 419 So.2d 678 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).