Case Name: Edwin S. SWIONTEK, Petitioner, v. William R. WALTON, M.D., et al., Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1973-09-26
Citations: 283 So. 2d 359
Docket Number: No. 43120
Parties: Edwin S. SWIONTEK, Petitioner, v. William R. WALTON, M.D., et al., Respondents.
Judges: CARLTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 283
Pages: 359–360

Head Matter:
Edwin S. SWIONTEK, Petitioner, v. William R. WALTON, M.D., et al., Respondents.
No. 43120.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Sept. 26, 1973.
William F. Blews, and Joan LoBianco Walker, St. Petersburg, for petitioner.
William Duane Wood, III, of Ramseur, Bradham, Lyle, Skipper & Cramer, and Glenn M. Woodworth of Ulmer & Wood-worth, St. Petersburg, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further consid eration of the matter, we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 3, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.
It is so ordered.
CARLTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.