Case Name: Northern Pacific Railway Company, Respondent, v. W. R. Tuttle, Appellant
Court: Washington Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Washington
Decision Date: 1916-01-27
Citations: 89 Wash. 699
Docket Number: No. 11305
Parties: Northern Pacific Railway Company, Respondent, v. W. R. Tuttle, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Washington Reports
Volume: 89
Pages: 699–699

Head Matter:
[No. 11305.
Department Two.
January 27, 1916.]
Northern Pacific Railway Company, Respondent, v. W. R. Tuttle, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Pendergast, J., entered March 15, 1912, in favor of the plaintiff, in an action to quiet title, tried to the court.
Affirmed.
Harris Baldwin, for appellant.
Edward J. Cannon and Cannon, Ferris & Swan, for respondent.
Reported in 154 Pac. 796.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This case presents the same legal question involving the right of adverse possession of respondent's right of way as presented in Northern-Pac. R. Co. v. Concannon, 239 U. S. 382. The question being a Federal one, the cited case is controlling.
Judgment affirmed.