Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Ivan BREWSTER, a.k.a. Mike, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-06-20
Citations: 569 F. App'x 790
Docket Number: No. 13-14969
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Ivan BREWSTER, a.k.a. Mike, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 569
Pages: 790–790

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Ivan BREWSTER, a.k.a. Mike, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-14969
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
June 20, 2014.
Ramona Albin, Michael B. Billingsley, William Russell Chambers, Jr., John Clay Earnest, Jr., Alice H. Martin, William G. Simpson, Jenny Lynn Smith, Joyce White Vance, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Birmingham, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Michael Ivan Brewster, Atlanta, GA, pro se.
Before HULL, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Michael Brewster appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction. Brewster, who was convicted of use and possession of a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime as well as conspiracy and attempt to possess with intent to distribute cocaine and cocaine base, contends that because he was sentenced based on 1.5 kilograms of cocaine base his Guidelines range was lowered by Amendment 750, which revised the crack cocaine quantity tables to conform to the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010. See U.S.S.G.App. C, Amend. 750. We review for abuse of discretion the district court's decision not to reduce a sentence under § 3582(c)(2). United States v. Moreno, 421 F.3d 1217, 1219 (11th Cir.2005) (per curiam).
At Brewster's sentencing, the court adopted all factual statements found in Brewster's Presentence Investigation Report (PSR), including a statement attributing 4 kilograms of crack cocaine to the conspiracy, and gave Brewster a base offense level of 36. The court's finding as to the amount of crack Brewster was responsible for is not reviewable in a § 3582(c) resentencing. See United States v. Davis, 587 F.3d 1300, 1303 (11th Cir.2009) (per curiam) (noting that, in a § 3582(c) resentencing, district courts "must maintain all original sentencing determinations apart from the original Guidelines range" (internal quotation marks omitted)).
After Amendment 750, a defendant who is responsible for 2.8 to 8.4 kilograms of crack cocaine, receives a base offense level of 36—the same base offense level Brewster, whose conspiracy involved 4 kilograms of crack, originally received. U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(c)(2). Because the amendment does not impact the applicable Guidelines range, the district court correctly denied Brewster's motion. See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2); U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(a)(2)(B) (noting that a § 3582(c) reduction is not authorized unless an amendment lowers a defendant's guideline range).
AFFIRMED.