Case Name: Rosaly SHEPPARD and The Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Appellants, v. Arthur SHEPPARD, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-12-14
Citations: 630 So. 2d 1159
Docket Number: No. 92-1503
Parties: Rosaly SHEPPARD and The Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Appellants, v. Arthur SHEPPARD, Appellee.
Judges: Before BASKIN, FERGUSON and LEVY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 630
Pages: 1159–1160

Head Matter:
Rosaly SHEPPARD and The Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Appellants, v. Arthur SHEPPARD, Appellee.
No. 92-1503.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 14, 1993.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 22, 1994.
Marcia K. Lippincott, Orlando, Diane H. Tutt, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.
Cypen & Cypen and Stephen Cypen, Miami Beach, for appellee.
Before BASKIN, FERGUSON and LEVY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the order denying appellant Sheppard's exceptions to the general master's report and confirming and approving the general master's report. "The findings of fact and recommendations of a master should be approved and adopted by a trial, judge unless clearly erroneous, or it appears that the máster has misconceived the legal effect of the evidence." Barrow v. Barrow, 563 So.2d 219, 219 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Bloom v. Bloom, 414 So.2d 1153 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Landis v. Landis, 486 So.2d 28 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). The court's ratification and adoption of the master's report is proper; the master's findings are supported by the record. • Thus, the order under review is affirmed.
Affirmed.