Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. JAMES E. BRADSHAW, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1984-01-18
Citations: 66 Or. App. 585
Docket Number: 20-414; CA A20459
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. JAMES E. BRADSHAW, Appellant.
Judges: Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Young, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 66
Pages: 585–586

Head Matter:
Remanded from United States Supreme Court June 23, 1983,
affirmed January 18,
reconsideration denied February 24,
petition for review denied March 27, 1984 (296 Or 712)
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. JAMES E. BRADSHAW, Appellant.
(20-414; CA A20459)
674 P2d 1190
Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant.
David B. Frohnmayer, Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent.
Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Young, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
In State v. Bradshaw, 54 Or App 949, 636 P2d 1011 (1981), rev den 292 Or 568 (1982), we determined that, under Edwards v. Arizona, 451 US 477, 101 S Ct 1880, 68 L Ed 2d 378 (1981), the trial court erred in admitting statements made by the defendant after he had requested an attorney. The United States Supreme Court reversed and remanded. Oregon v. Bradshaw,_US_, 103 S Ct 2830, 77 L Ed 2d 405 (1983).
We denied defendant's motion to file supplemental briefs and to make additional argument based on Article I, section 12, of the Oregon Constitution. The proffered argument was not made in the trial court. Defendant's brief raises no other issues. Pursuant to the United States Supreme Court's decision, defendant's conviction is affirmed.
Affirmed.