Case Name: Sam Long v. R. M. Anderson
Court: Texas Commission of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1881-10-20
Citations: 1 White & W. 662
Docket Number: No. 2026, Op. Book No. 2, p. 455
Parties: Sam Long v. R. M. Anderson.
Judges: 
Reporter: Condensed Reports of Decisions in Civil Causes in the Court of Appeals (White & Wilson)
Volume: 1
Pages: 662–663

Head Matter:
Sam Long v. R. M. Anderson.
(No. 2026, Op. Book No. 2, p. 455.)
Error from Lamar County.

Opinion:
Opinion by
Watts, J.
§ 1161. Injunction will not be granted when party has a legal remedy. Defendant in error in the county court enjoined a judgment which plaintiff in error had recovered against him injustice's court, amounting to $105.55, and upon trial of the case the county court perpetuated' the injunction. Held, the defendant in error had a complete legal remedy against the judgment, if it was erroneous, by appeal or certiorari, and the judgment was not a void judgment. In such case it is a well established rule that as long as a party has a legal remedy by appeal or cerliorari, he cannot resort to equitable proceeding by injunction, and in that way secure the benefits of an appeal.
October 20, 1881.
Reversed and dismissed.
Note. — This suit was instituted in 1873, and hence the want of jurisdiction in the county judge to issue the injunction was not called in question, as it would be under our present constitution and laws.