Case Name: BUCKLEY TOWERS CONDOMINIUM, INC., etc., et al., Appellants, v. Minerva MILLIS, Individually and on behalf of Buckley Towers Condominium, Inc., etc., et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1977-12-06
Citations: 352 So. 2d 585
Docket Number: No. 76-2047
Parties: BUCKLEY TOWERS CONDOMINIUM, INC., etc., et al., Appellants, v. Minerva MILLIS, Individually and on behalf of Buckley Towers Condominium, Inc., etc., et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before PEARSON, HUBBART and KE-HOE, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 352
Pages: 585–585

Head Matter:
BUCKLEY TOWERS CONDOMINIUM, INC., etc., et al., Appellants, v. Minerva MILLIS, Individually and on behalf of Buckley Towers Condominium, Inc., etc., et al., Appellees.
No. 76-2047.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 6, 1977.
Joseph S. Paglino, Miami, for appellants.
Dubbin, Schiff, Berkman & Dubbin and Albert S. Dubbin and Evan Langbein, Miami, for appellees.
Before PEARSON, HUBBART and KE-HOE, JJ.

Opinion:
KEHOE, Judge.
Appellant brings this appeal from an order of the trial court denying its motion to intervene in the cause as a party defendant. Appellant's three points on appeal relate to the question of whether the trial court abused its discretion or erred by denying appellant's motion. We have carefully considered each of these points and have concluded that the trial court did not abuse its discretion or err in denying the motion. Therefore, we affirm the order of the trial court dated October 7, 1976, denying appellant's motion to intervene. See Miracle House Corporation v. Haige, 96 So.2d 417 (Fla.1957); Riviera Club v. Belle Mead Development Corp., 141 Fla. 538, 194 So. 783 (1959); Coral Bay Prop. Own. Ass'n v. City of Coral Gables, 305 So.2d 853 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); Oster v. Cay Construction Company, 204 So.2d 539 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967); and Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.230.
Affirmed.