Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bryant Lashawn SINGLETON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-12-20
Citations: 22 F. App'x 295
Docket Number: No. 01-4533
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bryant Lashawn SINGLETON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 22
Pages: 295–296

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bryant Lashawn SINGLETON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 01-4533.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 7, 2001.
Decided Dec. 20, 2001.
Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Shea Riggsbee Denning, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. John Stuart Bruce, United States Attorney, Anne M. Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, J. Gaston B. Williams, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Bryant Lashawn Singleton pled guilty to aiding and assisting an attempted escape of a federal prisoner, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 752(a) (1994). The district court sentenced Singleton to eighteen months' imprisonment, followed by a three year supervised release term. Thereafter, the district court revoked Singleton's supervised release and imposed a twenty-four month term of imprisonment based on several admitted violations.
Singleton's sole claim on appeal is that his twenty-four month sentence was unreasonable because it exceeded the recommended sentencing range of six to twelve months. Finding no abuse of discretion in the district court's revocation sentence, we affirm. See United States v. Davis, 53 F.3d 638 (4th Cir.1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.