Case Name: Raymond J. VERONDA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY & FIRE PROTECTION, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-03-14
Citations: 58 F. App'x 363
Docket Number: No. 02-16437; D.C. No. CV-99-05244-MMC
Parties: Raymond J. VERONDA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY & FIRE PROTECTION, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 58
Pages: 363–363

Head Matter:
Raymond J. VERONDA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY & FIRE PROTECTION, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 02-16437.
D.C. No. CV-99-05244-MMC.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 10, 2003.
Decided March 14, 2003.
Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Raymond J. Veronda appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection in his employment discrimination action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Burrell v. Star Nursery, Inc., 170 F.3d 951, 954 (9th Cir.1999), and we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's summary judgment order filed on July 12, 2002.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.