Case Name: Protest 165846-G of G. M. Boutross Co., Inc. (New York)
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1938-07-18
Citations: 1 Cust. Ct. 341
Docket Number: No. 39014
Parties: Protest 165846-G of G. M. Boutross Co., Inc. (New York).
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Volume: 1
Pages: 341–341

Head Matter:
Before the Second Division,
July 18, 1938
No. 39014.
Protest 165846-G of G. M. Boutross Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion:
Opinion by
Tilson, J.
It was found that certain items consist of filet laces similar to those involved in United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065) and other items like those passed upon in Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396). On the established facts filet laces and certain towels and squares were held dutiable as embroidered at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.