Case Name: Douglas ISOM, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2001-07-12
Citations: 790 So. 2d 1092
Docket Number: No. SC00-724
Parties: Douglas ISOM, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: WELLS, C.J, and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 790
Pages: 1092–1092

Head Matter:
Douglas ISOM, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. SC00-724.
Supreme Court of Florida.
July 12, 2001.
Mary E. Adkins, Melrose, FL, for Petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Michael J. Neimand, Sénior Assistant Attorney General, and Douglas J. Glaid, Assistant Attorney General, Fort Lauder-dale, FL, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted review in Isom v. State, 750 So.2d 734 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), based on an alleged express and direct conflict with the First District's decision in Daniels v. State, 593 So.2d 312 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). Upon closer examination, however, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted in this case. Therefore, we dismiss review of this cause.
It is so ordered.
WELLS, C.J, and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., concur.