Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Angel VASQUEZ-VASQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-04-20
Citations: 376 F. App'x 806
Docket Number: No. 06-10245
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Angel VASQUEZ-VASQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: RYMER, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 376
Pages: 806–807

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Angel VASQUEZ-VASQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-10245.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 5, 2009.
Filed April 20, 2010.
Angela M. Martinez, USTU — Office of the U.S. Attorney Evo A. Deconcini U.S. Courthouse, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Ap-pellee.
Charles N. Kendall, Jr., Esq., Kendall Law Firm, PC, Nogales, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: RYMER, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Angel Vasquez-Vasquez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 24-month sentence for conspiracy to transport illegal aliens and transportation of an illegal alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1824(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Vasquez-Vasquez's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a request to withdraw as counsel of record.
By order filed February 1, 2010, counsel was advised that the court appeared to lack jurisdiction over the appeal because appellant has been released from custody and his term of supervised release has expired. Counsel was ordered to move for voluntary dismissal or show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed. To date, counsel has not responded.
Because Vasquez-Vasquez has been released from custody and his term of supervised release has expired, we dismiss the appeal as moot. See United States v. Palomba, 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir.1999).
Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the appeal is DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.