Case Name: SUNKIST GROWERS, INC., a Corporation, and the Exchange Orange Products Company, a Corporation, Appellants, v. WINCKLER & SMITH CITRUS PRODUCTS CO., a Corporation, and Ronald Walker, Trustee, Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1961-05-05
Citations: 289 F.2d 933
Docket Number: No. 15242
Parties: SUNKIST GROWERS, INC., a Corporation, and the Exchange Orange Products Company, a Corporation, Appellants, v. WINCKLER & SMITH CITRUS PRODUCTS CO., a Corporation, and Ronald Walker, Trustee, Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 289
Pages: 933–933

Head Matter:
SUNKIST GROWERS, INC., a Corporation, and the Exchange Orange Products Company, a Corporation, Appellants, v. WINCKLER & SMITH CITRUS PRODUCTS CO., a Corporation, and Ronald Walker, Trustee, Appellees.
No. 15242.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
May 5, 1961.
Before STEPHENS, BARNES and MERRILL, Circuit 'Judges.

Opinion:
Upon petitions for rehearing by both appellants and appellees, we modify the opinion heretofore filed as follows:
I. The balance of the first full sentence after the word "or", page 24, line 4, of slip opinion [284 F.2d 17], is stricken, and inserted in its place is the following :
" (2) the alleged illegal sole trader decision not to sell, made when such refusal would, as a natural consequence, illegally restrain trade or commerce, and implemented by other illegal means beyond the • bare refusal, or '(3) a similar unilateral decision not to sell, except'at a fixed price, made from a monopoly position, and resulting, as a natural consequence, in the elimination of a competitor"
II. On page 50, line T8 from top of slip opinion.[284 F.2d 33], the language "and a sale on account thereof already set," is deleted.
The petitions for rehearing are severally denied. The suggestion for a rehearing en banc is rejected.