Case Name: PACIFIC AIRCORP 21632, INC. and Pacific Aircorp 21968, Inc., Appellants, v. Nelson RAMIZ and Haydhelen Velazquez-Ramiz, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2009-02-11
Citations: 2 So. 3d 1085
Docket Number: No. 3D08-1133
Parties: PACIFIC AIRCORP 21632, INC. and Pacific Aircorp 21968, Inc., Appellants, v. Nelson RAMIZ and Haydhelen Velazquez-Ramiz, Appellees.
Judges: Before WELLS and SHEPHERD, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 2
Pages: 1085–1085

Head Matter:
PACIFIC AIRCORP 21632, INC. and Pacific Aircorp 21968, Inc., Appellants, v. Nelson RAMIZ and Haydhelen Velazquez-Ramiz, Appellees.
No. 3D08-1133.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 11, 2009.
Anania, Bandklayder, Baumgarten, Tor-ricella & Stein and Francis A. Anania; Coblentz, Patch, Duffy & Bass and Richard Patch, for appellants.
Renaldy J. Gutierrez and Kathleen M. Sales, Miami; and Robert J. Schaffer, Punta Gorda, for appellees.
Before WELLS and SHEPHERD, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Applying any conceivable standard of review, see Ryder Sys., Inc. v. Davis, 997 So.2d 1133 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008), there is nothing in the record to support any of the elements of the forum non conveniens doctrine, see Kinney Sys., Inc. v. Cont'l Ins. Co., 674 So.2d 86 (Fla.1996), let alone, as is required, all of them. See Telemundo Network Group, LLC v. Azteca Int'l Corp., 957 So.2d 705 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007). Therefore, the order dismissing the case on that basis is reversed.
Reversed.