Case Name: DOCTOR'S CHOICE PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION CENTER, P.C., (LASELVA), Respondent v. TRAVELERS PERSONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2014-12-31
Citations: 630 Pa. 640
Docket Number: No. 512 MAL 2014
Parties: DOCTOR’S CHOICE PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION CENTER, P.C., (LASELVA), Respondent v. TRAVELERS PERSONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner.
Judges: 
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 630
Pages: 640–641

Head Matter:
107 A.3d 747
DOCTOR’S CHOICE PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION CENTER, P.C., (LASELVA), Respondent v. TRAVELERS PERSONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Dec. 31, 2014.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 31st day of December, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner are:
(1) Whether the Superior Court improperly interpreted § 1797 of the MVFRL, the Supreme Court case of Herd Chiropractic v. State Farm, and its own case of Levine v. Travelers, to allow attorneys' fees even when an insurer has utilized the peer review process?
(2) Whether the Superior Court improperly interpreted and misapplied § 1797(b)(4) by holding that the insurer must oversee the statutory compliance of peer review organizations with 31 Pa.Code § 69.53(e)?