Case Name: COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA, Appellant, v. HOLLISTER ESTATE COMPANY (a Corporation) et al., Respondents
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1931-02-04
Citations: 111 Cal. App. 564
Docket Number: Civ. No. 7232
Parties: COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA, Appellant, v. HOLLISTER ESTATE COMPANY (a Corporation) et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports
Volume: 111
Pages: 564–565

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 7232.
Second Appellate District, Division One.
February 4, 1931.]
COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA, Appellant, v. HOLLISTER ESTATE COMPANY (a Corporation) et al., Respondents.
Clarence C. Ward, District Attorney, and A. G. Balaam, Deputy District Attorney, for Appellant.
Heaney, Price & Postel and Percy C. Heckendorf for Respondents.

Opinion:
YORK, J.
This is an appeal from a' judgment awarding damages in a condemnation suit brought for the condemnation of a street for a public road. Almost all or both of appellant's briefs consist of comparison or weighing of the evidence of values given, as to the values of the lands to be taken, and the damage to the defendants, by reason of severance.
The only assignments of error made in appellant's opening brief are: First, that the evidence dos not sustain the verdict, and second, that the compensation awarded respondent is excessive.
If there is any evidence to sustain the awards we cannot weigh the evidence. There is in the record sufficient evidence to sustain the awards of the jury in this case.
The judgment is affirmed.
Conrey, P. J., and Houser, J., concurred.