Case Name: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Anthony F. PAYNE, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-11-02
Citations: 550 So. 2d 1120
Docket Number: No. 73821
Parties: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Anthony F. PAYNE, Respondent.
Judges: EHRLICH, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, barkett, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 550
Pages: 1120–1120

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Anthony F. PAYNE, Respondent.
No. 73821.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Nov. 2, 1989.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Edward C. Hill, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for petitioner.
Michael E. Allen, Public Defender, and Michael J. Minerva, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We accepted jurisdiction of Payne v. State, 538 So.2d 1302 (Fla.1st DCA 1989), based on apparent conflict with Carawan v. State, 515 So.2d 161 (Fla.1987). Upon examination of the record and argument of counsel, we have determined that the opinion below is not in conflict with Carawan. Accordingly, we dismiss this cause on the ground that jurisdiction was granted improvidently.
It is so ordered.
EHRLICH, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, barkett, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.
NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ENTERTAINED BY THIS COURT.