Case Name: CITY OF MONROE, ET AL. v. COOPER, ET AL.; CITY OF MONROE, ET AL. v. BREARD; CITY OF MONROE, ET AL. v. HAWKS; CITY OF MONROE, ET AL. v. HUDSON; CITY OF MONROE, ET AL. v. BREARD, JR.
Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1928-11-12
Citations: 9 La. App. 291
Docket Number: No. 3384; No. 3385; No. 3386; No. 3387; No. 3388
Parties: CITY OF MONROE, ET AL. v. COOPER, ET AL. CITY OF MONROE, ET AL. v. BREARD CITY OF MONROE, ET AL. v. HAWKS CITY OF MONROE, ET AL. v. HUDSON CITY OF MONROE, ET AL. v. BREARD, JR.
Judges: 
Reporter: Louisiana Court of Appeals Reports
Volume: 9
Pages: 291–291

Head Matter:
No. 3384
Second Circuit
CITY OF MONROE, ET AL. v. COOPER, ET AL. CITY OF MONROE, ET AL. v. BREARD CITY OF MONROE, ET AL. v. HAWKS CITY OF MONROE, ET AL. v. HUDSON CITY OF MONROE, ET AL. v. BREARD, JR.
No. 3385
Second Circuit
No. 3386
Second Circuit
No. 3387
Second Circuit
No. 3388
Second Circuit
(November 12, 1928. Opinion and Decree.)
H. H. Russell; Theus, Grisham and Davis, of Monroe, attorneys for plaintiffs, appellees.
Hudson, Potts, Bernstein & Sholars, of Monroe, attorneys for defendants, appellants.

Opinion:
BY WHOLE COURT.
This Court has no jurisdiction in this case, because the controversy involves the constitutionality or legality of a local improvement assessment imposed by the municipality of the City of Monroe. The Supreme Court has appellate jurisdiction in such cases (See Sec. 10, Art. VII, Constitution of 1921).
It is therefore ordered that this case be transferred to the Supreme Court.