Case Name: GREENMAN CORPORATE CONSULTANTS, INC. and Greenman Advertising Associates, Inc., both d/b/a The Greenman Group, Inc., Appellants, v. SANDY KEY PROPERTIES, LTD., an Alabama Limited Partnership, Sandy Key Development Co., Thomas S. O'Rorke and Marion L. Bradford, as General Partners, and Thomas S. O'Rorke and Marion L. Bradford, Individually, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-01-24
Citations: 555 So. 2d 955
Docket Number: No. 88-3265
Parties: GREENMAN CORPORATE CONSULTANTS, INC. and Greenman Advertising Associates, Inc., both d/b/a The Greenman Group, Inc., Appellants, v. SANDY KEY PROPERTIES, LTD., an Alabama Limited Partnership, Sandy Key Development Co., Thomas S. O’Rorke and Marion L. Bradford, as General Partners, and Thomas S. O’Rorke and Marion L. Bradford, Individually, Appellees.
Judges: ANSTEAD, WALDEN and POLEN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 555
Pages: 955–956

Head Matter:
GREENMAN CORPORATE CONSULTANTS, INC. and Greenman Advertising Associates, Inc., both d/b/a The Greenman Group, Inc., Appellants, v. SANDY KEY PROPERTIES, LTD., an Alabama Limited Partnership, Sandy Key Development Co., Thomas S. O’Rorke and Marion L. Bradford, as General Partners, and Thomas S. O’Rorke and Marion L. Bradford, Individually, Appellees.
No. 88-3265.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jan. 24, 1990.
Charles A. Finkel of Jacobson and Fink-el, Hollywood, for appellants.
No brief filed for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
REVERSED. We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in concluding that there were no material issues of fact con- cernmg appellant s claims against appellees and in entering summary final judgment.
ANSTEAD, WALDEN and POLEN, JJ., concur.