Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pablo ALVAREZ-JIMENEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-04-19
Citations: 688 F. App'x 428
Docket Number: No. 15-50552
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pablo ALVAREZ-JIMENEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 688
Pages: 428–429

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pablo ALVAREZ-JIMENEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-50552
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 11, 2017
Filed April 19, 2017
Helen H. Hong, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Mark R. Rehe, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the US Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Debra Ann Dilorio, Attorney, Law Office of Debra Dilorio, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant
Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Pablo Alvarez-Jimenez appeals from the district court's judgment and challenges the 30-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a removed alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Alvarez-Jimenez challenges the 16-level enhancement that the district court imposed on the basis of his 2013 aggravated assault conviction.
This sentencing appeal is moot because Alvarez-Jimenez has fully served his custodial sentence and is not subject to a term of supervised release. See United States v. Palomba, 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.