Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mario SOTO-LANDAVERDE, aka Mario Landaverde Soto, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-05-24
Citations: 35 F. App'x 626
Docket Number: No. 01-10342; D.C. No. CR-00-01171-JMR
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Mario SOTO-LANDAVERDE, aka Mario Landaverde Soto, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before FERNANDEZ, THOMAS, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 35
Pages: 626–626

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Mario SOTO-LANDAVERDE, aka Mario Landaverde Soto, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 01-10342.
D.C. No. CR-00-01171-JMR.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 13, 2002 .
Decided May 24, 2002.
Before FERNANDEZ, THOMAS, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Mario Soto-Landaverde appeals from his guilty plea conviction and sentence for illegal re-entry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), with a sentencing enhancement pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2). Landaverde's counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California., 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating there are no arguable issues for review and seeking to withdraw as counsel of record.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no issues for review. Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.