Case Name: UNITED STATES, Plaintiff in Error, v. Abraham KIRSCH, Defendant in Error
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1926-12-06
Citations: 16 F.2d 204
Docket Number: No. 89
Parties: UNITED STATES, Plaintiff in Error, v. Abraham KIRSCH, Defendant in Error.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 16
Pages: 204–204

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES, Plaintiff in Error, v. Abraham KIRSCH, Defendant in Error.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
December 6, 1926.)
No. 89.
Emory R.' Buckner and John M. Harlan, both of New York City, for the United States;
Leo H. Klugherz and Leonard A. Snitkin, both of New York City, for defendant in error.
Before HOUGH, MANTON, and HAND, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This case was argued as a companion to United States v. Kirschenblatt (C. C. A.) 16 F.(2d) 202, and involves the same point. In view of the disposition of that ease, there is no occasion for any discussion of this.
Order affirmed.