Case Name: K.C., the mother, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and Guardian Ad Litem Program, Appellees.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2018-11-28
Citations: 259 So. 3d 880
Docket Number: No. 4D18-2345
Parties: K.C., the mother, Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and Guardian Ad Litem Program, Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 259
Pages: 880–881

Head Matter:
K.C., the mother, Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and Guardian Ad Litem Program, Appellees.
No. 4D18-2345
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
[November 28, 2018]
Anthony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, and Paul O'Neil, Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Sarah Elizabeth Goldfarb of Statewide Florida Guardian ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, for appellee Guardian Ad Litem Program.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carolyn Schwarz, Assistant Attorney General, Children's Legal Services, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee Florida Department of Children and Families.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We affirm the final judgment terminating appellant's parental rights to her child, as competent substantial evidence supports the trial court's findings. See B.K. v. Dep't of Children & Families , 166 So.3d 866, 872-73 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (noting that the review of a trial court's findings in a termination proceeding is highly deferential, and a trial court's findings carry a presumption of correctness and will not be overturned unless clearly erroneous or lacking in evidentiary support). We remand, however, to correct the final judgment by removing the court's conclusion of law that clear and convincing evidence supported termination based upon section 39.806(1)(g), Florida Statutes. The parties all agree that the Department of Children and Families dismissed this ground as a basis for termination, which the trial court noted at the final hearing but nevertheless included it in its final judgment. It would be a violation of appellant's due process rights of notice and a fair hearing to terminate her parental rights based on a ground which was not noticed or tried by implied consent. See R.S. v. Dep't of Children and Families , 872 So.2d 412, 413 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). However, the trial court also found that clear and convincing evidence supported termination pursuant to sections 39.806(1)(c) and 39.806(1)(f), Florida Statutes. Where the trial court's ruling on any ground for termination is supported by competent substantial evidence, the trial court's decision should be upheld. See J.E. v. Dep't of Children & Families , 126 So.3d 424, 427-28 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).
Affirmed and remanded with directions.
Warner, Damoorgian and Kuntz, JJ., concur.