Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gilberto LOPEZ-CASTRO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-04-15
Citations: 311 F. App'x 89
Docket Number: No. 07-4266
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gilberto LOPEZ-CASTRO, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MURPHY, EBEL, and O’BRIEN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 311
Pages: 89–89

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gilberto LOPEZ-CASTRO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-4266.
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
April 15, 2008.
Mark K. Vincent, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Salt Lake City, UT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Scott Keith Wilson, Utah Federal Defender Office, Salt Lake City, UT, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before MURPHY, EBEL, and O’BRIEN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER AND JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.
This matter is before the court on the government's motion to enforce the appeal waiver contained in defendant's plea agreement. The motion is filed pursuant to United States v. Hahn, 359 F.3d 1315 (10th Cir.2004) (en banc). In response, defendant concedes that the government's motion is well taken and that the appeal should be dismissed.
Accordingly, the government's motion is GRANTED, and the appeal is DISMISSED.
This panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R.App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.