Case Name: Suk Cho Kim, Appellant, v. Eun Jung Kim, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2013-07-31
Citations: 108 A.D.3d 760
Docket Number: 
Parties: Suk Cho Kim, Appellant, v Eun Jung Kim, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 108
Pages: 760–760

Head Matter:
Suk Cho Kim, Appellant, v Eun Jung Kim, Respondent.
[969 NYS2d 799]

Opinion:
— In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Jackman-Brown, J.), dated January 3, 2013, which denied his motion, in effect, to compel disclosure of all underlying data, empirical test results, records, and notes utilized by a court-appointed forensic evaluator in preparing a report dated October 6, 2011.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Under the particular circumstances presented here, the plaintiff failed to establish his entitlement to the relief sought (see CFLR article 31). Rivera, J.P., Balkin, Leventhal and Cohen, JJ., concur.