Case Name: State ex rel. Robert Neafie v. Board of Commissioners of Everglades Drainage District, et al.
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1940-10-08
Citations: 144 Fla. 535
Docket Number: 
Parties: State ex rel. Robert Neafie v. Board of Commissioners of Everglades Drainage District, et al.
Judges: Whitfield, Buford, Chapman and Ti-iomas, J. J., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 144
Pages: 535–536

Head Matter:
State ex rel. Robert Neafie v. Board of Commissioners of Everglades Drainage District, et al.
198 So. 499
En Banc
Opinion Filed October 8, 1940
Watson & Pasco & Brown and William Roberts (of New York City, N. Y.), for Relator;
Fred H. Kent, Francis D. Wheeler, Kent, Kassewits, Wheeler ’ & Crenshaw; C. G. Ashby and ' Stapp, Gourley, Ward &' Ward, and John D. Kennedy, for Respondents.

Opinion:
Terrell, C. J.
The record and the briefs in this case have been examined and it appears that the same subject matter is involved as was considered in Mark Tennant, et al., v. United States Sugar Corporation, and H. C. Rorick, et al., v. Reconstruction Finance Corporation; et al., decided this date. The questions answered in the last cited cases are decisive of the questions raised in this case, so the motion to quash the certificate of partial compliance with the peremptory writ is denied on authority of said cases. It being our. view that .the status of -the certificates involved being settled, they will be treated accordingly.
It is so ordered.
Whitfield, Buford, Chapman and Ti-iomas, J. J., concur.
Brown, J., concurs specially.