Case Name: Jesse W. REED, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2017-10-17
Citations: 539 S.W.3d 740
Docket Number: No. ED 104753
Parties: Jesse W. REED, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before James M. Dowd, C.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., Angela T. Quigless, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 539
Pages: 740–741

Head Matter:
Jesse W. REED, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 104753
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Filed: October 17, 2017
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied December 19, 2017
Amy E. Lowe, Matthew J. Bell, Co-Counsel, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Mo. 63101, for appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO. 65102, for respondent.
Before James M. Dowd, C.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., Angela T. Quigless, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Jesse W. Reed ("Movant") appeals from a judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, Movant raises four points, asserting claims of error involving double jeopardy, ineffective assistance of counsel, and disproportionate sentences. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
All rule references are to Missouri Supreme Court Rules (2017).