Case Name: CARNIVAL CRUISE LINES, INC., Appellant, v. Pilar ALVAREZ, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1984-01-24
Citations: 444 So. 2d 537
Docket Number: No. 83-1077
Parties: CARNIVAL CRUISE LINES, INC., Appellant, v. Pilar ALVAREZ, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARK-DULL and HUBBART, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 444
Pages: 537–538

Head Matter:
CARNIVAL CRUISE LINES, INC., Appellant, v. Pilar ALVAREZ, Appellee.
No. 83-1077.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan. 24, 1984.
Smathers & Thompson and Rodney Earl Walton, Miami, for appellant.
Horton, Perse & Ginsberg and Arnold Ginsberg, Carroll, Halberg & Meyerson, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARK-DULL and HUBBART, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Rejecting each of the defendant's contentions on this appeal from an adverse judgment entered after a non-jury trial in a personal injury action, we hold that (a) the determination of liability is supported by the evidence, Majeske v. Palm Beach Ken nel Club, 117 So.2d 531 (Fla.2d DCA 1959), cert. denied, 122 So.2d 408 (Fla.1960); Millar v. Tropical Gables Corp., 99 So.2d 589 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958); 9 Fla.Jur.2d Carriers § 111, 126 (1979); (b) the damage award is not beyond the province of the trier of fact, Bould v. Touchette, 349 So.2d 1181 (Fla.1977); and (c) no harmful error has been demonstrated in the admission or striking of various items of evidence. Binger v. King Pest Control, 401 So.2d 1310 (Fla. 1981); Prince v. Aucilla Naval Stores Co., 103 Fla. 605, 137 So. 886 (1931); Landin v. Oerting, 61 Fla. 652, 55 So. 843 (1911); Leeb v. Read, 190 So.2d 830 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966); Sec. 59.041, Fla.Stat. (1981).
Affirmed.