Case Name: Oscar GARCIA, Appellant, v. Icer GARCIA, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1984-02-28
Citations: 445 So. 2d 1093
Docket Number: No. 83-563
Parties: Oscar GARCIA, Appellant, v. Icer GARCIA, Appellee.
Judges: Before NESBITT, DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 445
Pages: 1093–1094

Head Matter:
Oscar GARCIA, Appellant, v. Icer GARCIA, Appellee.
No. 83-563.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 28, 1984.
Rehearing Denied April 10, 1984.
Hershoff & Levy and Jay Levy, Miami, for appellant.
Maurice Jay Kutner, Miami, for appellee.
Before NESBITT, DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.

Opinion:
NESBITT, Judge.
The husband filed a petition for dissolution of marriage and sought partition of the marital property. The wife counterclaimed seeking equitable distribution. The husband appeals from the trial court order granting equitable distribution.
He argues, based on Hu v. Hu, 432 So.2d 1389 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983), that in the absence of a pleading setting forth a claim for lump sum alimony, the trial court could not equitably distribute the property. The wife, citing Tronconi v. Tronconi, 425 So.2d 547 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (en banc), responds that equitable distribution, in and of itself, is a vehicle which can be utilized to justify a property award without a claim for alimony.
Because we find that this issue was not raised by the husband below, we are pre- eluded from considering it on appeal. Concluding that the other contentions raised by the husband are without merit, we affirm.