Case Name: OCCIDENTAL REALTY COMPANY, INC. d/b/a Occidental Coal Company of Tennessee, et al., Appellants, v. GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Appellee
Court: District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Delaware
Decision Date: 1973-03-06
Citations: 301 A.2d 66
Docket Number: No. 6619
Parties: OCCIDENTAL REALTY COMPANY, INC. d/b/a Occidental Coal Company of Tennessee, et al., Appellants, v. GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Appellee.
Judges: Before FICKLING, KERN and YEAG-LEY, Associate Judges.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 301
Pages: 66–66

Head Matter:
OCCIDENTAL REALTY COMPANY, INC. d/b/a Occidental Coal Company of Tennessee, et al., Appellants, v. GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Appellee.
No. 6619.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Argued Jan. 24, 1973.
Decided March 6, 1973.
Richard Whittington Whitlock, Washington, D. C., for appellants.
Thomas H. Talbott, Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Before FICKLING, KERN and YEAG-LEY, Associate Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appellants were sued for money alleged to have been erroneously paid by ap-pellee on appellants' behalf to the State of West Virginia under a surety contract. The motions judge granted appellee's motion for summary judgment after refusing to allow oral testimony in defense of the motion. He held that he could not take oral testimony either in support or in opposition to a motion for summary judgment under Superior Court Civil Rule 56. Appellants contend that this was error. We agree and reverse.
Superior Court Civil Rule 56(c) does not list oral testimony as material to be used during a hearing on a motion for summary judgment; however, Superior Court Civil Rule 43(e) permits the court to hear oral testimony on such a motion. See 6 J. Moore, Federal Practice ¶ 56.-11 [8] (2d ed. 1948). See also 9 C. Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure: Civil § 2416 (1971). While it is within the sound discretion of the trial court to exclude oral testimony during a motion for summary judgment, here that discretion was not exercised. The judgment of the trial court is
Reversed.
. Super.Ct.Civ.R. 43 and 56 are identical to Fed.R.Civ.P. 43 and 56.
. See McGuire v. Columbia Broadcasting Sys., Inc., 399 F.2d 902, 907 (9th Cir.1968).