Case Name: Samuel Kent et al., Respondents, v. Thomas Buttarazzi, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1968-02-22
Citations: 29 A.D.2d 842
Docket Number: 
Parties: Samuel Kent et al., Respondents, v. Thomas Buttarazzi, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 29
Pages: 842–842

Head Matter:
Samuel Kent et al., Respondents, v. Thomas Buttarazzi, Appellant.

Opinion:
Motion to dismiss appeal denied without prejudice to renew upon a showing that the appeal does not involve " a fundamental jurisdictional question of fact as to the petition's sufficiency or a triable issue of fact determination of which against petitioner would render the petition fatally defective". (Great Neck Water Auth. v. Citizens Water Supply Co. of Newtown, 12 N Y 2d 167, 173.) In the event of such renewal, the motion papers should include, among other things, a cony of the petition and of the answer.