Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Clayton D. REEHTEN, Appellant.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2018-10-30
Citations: 563 S.W.3d 152
Docket Number: No. ED 105901
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent,
v.
Clayton D. REEHTEN, Appellant.
Judges: Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 563
Pages: 152–152

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent,
v.
Clayton D. REEHTEN, Appellant.
No. ED 105901
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Filed: October 30, 2018
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied December 3, 2018
FOR APPELLANTS: Irene C. Karns, 503 E. Nifong #212, Columbia, Missouri 65201.
FOR RESPONDENTS: Garrick Aplin, Joshua D. Hawley, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.
Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Clayton Reehten appeals the judgment entered following a jury trial finding him guilty of the class D felony of resisting arrest, for which he was sentenced to a term of seven years' imprisonment. Reehten contends that the trial court abused its discretion in submitting the verdict director for his felony conviction because it presented to the jury a different offense than any with which he had been charged and therefore violated his due process rights. We affirm.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25.
Reehten was also found guilty in the same proceeding of the class A misdemeanor of resisting a lawful stop and sentenced to a concurrent term of one year in prison, and was acquitted of three counts of the class C felony of possession of a controlled substance.