Case Name: Hamilton Trust Company of Paterson, New Jersey, appellant, v. Louise Bamford, executrix, &c., et al., respondents
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1929-10-14
Citations: 105 N.J. Eq. 249
Docket Number: 
Parties: Hamilton Trust Company of Paterson, New Jersey, appellant, v. Louise Bamford, executrix, &c., et al., respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 105
Pages: 249–249

Head Matter:
Hamilton Trust Company of Paterson, New Jersey, appellant, v. Louise Bamford, executrix, &c., et al., respondents.
[Decided October 14th, 1929.]
Messrs. Humphreys <& Sumner, for the appellant.
Mr. Merritt Lane and Mr. Robert J. McDermott, for the respondents.

Opinion:
Pee Cueiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis, and reported in 102 N. J. Eq. 454.
For affirmance — The Chiep-Justice, Teenchaed, Pabkee, Kalisoh, Black, Campbell, Lloyb, Case, Bobine, White, Van Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Hetpielb, Deae, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.