Case Name: Michael MORGAN, Appellant, v. Marilyn MORGAN, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2006-01-04
Citations: 932 So. 2d 298
Docket Number: No. 2D05-2819
Parties: Michael MORGAN, Appellant, v. Marilyn MORGAN, Appellee.
Judges: SALCINES and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 932
Pages: 298–298

Head Matter:
Michael MORGAN, Appellant, v. Marilyn MORGAN, Appellee.
No. 2D05-2819.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Jan. 4, 2006.
Elisa S. Worthington of Garvin & Tripp, P.A.; and Stephen D. Thompson of Thompson & Schreiber, P.A., Fort Myers, for Appellant.
Nicole L. Goetz and Victoria M. Ho of Asbell, Ho & Klaus, P.A., Naples, for Ap-pellee.

Opinion:
STRINGER, Judge.
We affirm the trial court's order, entered on remand from the parties' earlier appeal, which imposes a lien on a portion of Michael Morgan's assets in favor of Marilyn Morgan as replacement security for Michael Morgan's alimony obligation. However, we remand to the trial court to strike the finding that the security obligation can be construed as lump sum alimony because that finding is outside the scope of our earlier remand and unnecessary to the order.
Affirmed in part; reversed in part; and remanded with directions.
SALCINES and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.