Case Name: Burton Katz, Respondent, v. Carrols Development Corporation et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1976-06-07
Citations: 53 A.D.2d 623
Docket Number: 
Parties: Burton Katz, Respondent, v Carrols Development Corporation et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 53
Pages: 623–624

Head Matter:
Burton Katz, Respondent, v Carrols Development Corporation et al., Appellants.

Opinion:
In an action inter alia to recover rent due under a written lease, defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated October 17, 1975, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination denying their motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. Appellants' sole contention is that they were entitled to summary judgment on the first cause of action. We disagree. That cause raises issues of fact which require a trial. Latham, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani, Rabin and Shapiro, JJ., concur.