Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fernando A. NINO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-05-15
Citations: 688 F. App'x 712
Docket Number: No. 16-15230 Non-Argument Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fernando A. NINO, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILLIAM PRYOR, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 688
Pages: 712–713

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fernando A. NINO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-15230 Non-Argument Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
(May 15, 2017)
Roberta Josephina Bodnar, U.S. Attorney’s Office — FLM, Ocala, FL, Arthur Lee Bentley, III, Yvette Rhodes, Joseph K. Ruddy, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Rosemary Cakmis, Donna Lee Elm, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Orlando, FL, Mary A. Mills, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Defendant-Appellant
Before WILLIAM PRYOR, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
All Kamalzadeh, appointed counsel for Fernando Nino in this appeal of the denial of Nino's motion to reduce his sentence, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assess ment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the denial of Nino's motion to reduce his sentence is AFFIRMED.