Case Name: Victor L. BROOKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1977-09-02
Citations: 349 So. 2d 794
Docket Number: No. 77-272
Parties: Victor L. BROOKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: HOBSON, Acting C. J., and McNULTY and SCHEB, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 349
Pages: 794–795

Head Matter:
Victor L. BROOKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 77-272.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Sept. 2, 1977.
Jack 0. Johnson, Public Defender, Bar-tow, and Stephen Lindsey Gorman, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Mary Jo M. Gallay, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The judgment appealed from is affirmed, but this case is remanded for resentencing of appellant. The present sentence does not specifically set forth the period of credit time to be allowed as required by Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1975); Smith v. State, 310 So.2d 770 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975). Moreover the phrase "at hard labor" in the sentence is improper. McDonald v. State, 321 So.2d 453 (Fla. 4th DC A 1975). The appellant does not have to be present at resentencing.
HOBSON, Acting C. J., and McNULTY and SCHEB, JJ., concur.