Case Name: Elizabeth Jean FRICKE, Appellant, v. David Sheldon FRICKE, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-06-30
Citations: 20 S.W.3d 615
Docket Number: No. ED 76455
Parties: Elizabeth Jean FRICKE, Appellant, v. David Sheldon FRICKE, Respondent.
Judges: Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 20
Pages: 615–616

Head Matter:
Elizabeth Jean FRICKE, Appellant, v. David Sheldon FRICKE, Respondent.
No. ED 76455.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
June 30, 2000.
John Robert O’Connor, Union, for appellant.
Prudence Fink Johnson, Union, for respondent.
Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Elizabeth Jean Frieke appeals from the decree entered in her dissolution-of-marriage suit against David Sheldon Frieke. We find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).