Case Name: Geobge R. Elliott, Respondent, v. Toledo Foundry & Machine Company, Appellant
Court: Washington Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Washington
Decision Date: 1911-12-01
Citations: 66 Wash. 701
Docket Number: No. 9698
Parties: Geobge R. Elliott, Respondent, v. Toledo Foundry & Machine Company, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Washington Reports
Volume: 66
Pages: 701–701

Head Matter:
[No. 9698.
Department One.
December 1, 1911.]
Geobge R. Elliott, Respondent, v. Toledo Foundry & Machine Company, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of tbe superior court for King county, Albertson, J., entered December 20, 1910.
Affirmed.
Wesley J. Wuerfel (James T. Lawler, of counsel), for appellant.
Gill, Hoyt & Frye and R. L. Blewett, for respondent.
Reported in 119 Pac. 19.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This appeal involves only the denial of a motion for a continuance of the trial of the case, upon the same grounds as the motion for a continuance in the case of Steenstrup v. Toledo Foundry & Machine Co., ante p. 101, 119 Pac. 16. For the reasons there stated, we conclude that there was no error in tbe denial of the motion for a continuance in this case. The judgment is therefore affirmed.