Case Name: U.S. v. Christopher N. Allore
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-02-01
Citations: 76 M.J. 119
Docket Number: No. 17-0186/AF
Parties: U.S. v. Christopher N. Allore.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Military Justice Reporter
Volume: 76
Pages: 119–119

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
Wednesday, February 1, 2017
No. 17-0186/AF.
U.S. v. Christopher N. Allore.

Opinion:
CCA 38912. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, it is noted that the court below failed to expressly act to affirm or set aside the findings and sentence. This has resulted in having a case before us for review that does not have a complete decision on the findings and sentence by the Court of Criminal Appeals. Under Article 67(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 867(c) (2012), this Court can only act with respect to the findings and sentence as affirmed or set aside by a court of criminal appeals. If the action on the findings and sentence is ambiguous, the appropriate remedy is a remand for clarification. Accordingly, it is ordered that the petition for grant of review is granted, and the record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Air Force for remand to the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals for clarification of its action on the findings and sentence.