Case Name: Pauline ATKINS, Appellant, v. Stanley H. PORTMAN and Marion Portman, Appellees
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1956-11-14
Citations: 90 So. 2d 627
Docket Number: 
Parties: Pauline ATKINS, Appellant, v. Stanley H. PORTMAN and Marion Portman, Appellees.
Judges: HOBSON, Acting Chief Justice, and THORNAL, O’CONNELL, and SE-BRING, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 90
Pages: 627–628

Head Matter:
Pauline ATKINS, Appellant, v. Stanley H. PORTMAN and Marion Portman, Appellees.
Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division A.
Nov. 14, 1956.
Richard Krieger Fink, Miami Beach, for appellant.
Melvin I. Muroff, Miami Beach, for ap-pellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellees to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to Rule 38 of the rules of this court, 31 F.S.A., and it appearing to the court from an examination of the -record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;
It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is
Affirmed.
HOBSON, Acting Chief Justice, and THORNAL, O'CONNELL, and SE-BRING, JJ., concur.