Case Name: EAST KENTUCKY RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Forest ERWIN et al., Appellee
Court: Kentucky Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Kentucky
Decision Date: 1958-02-21
Citations: 310 S.W.2d 554
Docket Number: 
Parties: EAST KENTUCKY RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Forest ERWIN et al., Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 310
Pages: 554–555

Head Matter:
EAST KENTUCKY RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Forest ERWIN et al., Appellee.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky.
Feb. 21, 1958.
Ralph Mitchell, Shelbyville, for appellant.
James F. Thomas, New Castle, for appel-lee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Motion for appeal by East Kentucky Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation from a judgment of the Henry Circuit Court, awarding Forest Erwin and others the sum of $1,500 for an easement which appellant obtained by the exercise of its right of eminent domain. The easement is 100 feet wide and 2,359 feet in length.
Appellant contends that the award is excessive and relies upon Salt River Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation v. Thurman, Ky., 275 S.W.2d 780, to support its position.
In Tennessee Gas Transmission Company v. Teater, Ky., 252 S.W.2d 674, it was pointed out that there is no definite yardstick which a court may apply in deciding whether damages are excessive in a given case.
Since the Thurman case, we have affirmed (always by a divided court) awards comparable to the one in the instant case. The cases are: East Kentucky Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation v. Hall, Ky., 301 S.W.2d 891, May 3, 1957; East Kentucky Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation v. Burke., Ky., 301 S.W.2d 892, May 3, 1957; East Kentucky Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation v. Asbury, Ky., 302 S.W.2d 370, May 17, 1957; East Kentucky Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation v. Wireman, Ky., November 22, 1957, 307 S.W.2d 556; East Kentucky Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation v. Blevins, Ky., 309 S.W.2d 345.
The damages do not strike us as being so excessive as to have been the result of passion and prejudice.
The motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment affirmed.