Case Name: H. B. STRINGFELLOW, Appellant, v. Delight R. BREIDEGAM, individually, I. J. Luman, individually, and Federal Battery & Cable Mfg. Co., a Florida corporation, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1962-03-01
Citations: 138 So. 2d 75
Docket Number: No. 61-422
Parties: H. B. STRINGFELLOW, Appellant, v. Delight R. BREIDEGAM, individually, I. J. Luman, individually, and Federal Battery & Cable Mfg. Co., a Florida corporation, Appellees.
Judges: Before PEARSON, TILLMAN, C. J., and HORTON and HENDRY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 138
Pages: 75–75

Head Matter:
H. B. STRINGFELLOW, Appellant, v. Delight R. BREIDEGAM, individually, I. J. Luman, individually, and Federal Battery & Cable Mfg. Co., a Florida corporation, Appellees.
No. 61-422.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
March 1, 1962.
Rehearing Denied March 19, 1962.
Agronow & Fensholt, Miami, for appellant.
Irvmg- Steinhardt, Miami, for appellees.
Before PEARSON, TILLMAN, C. J., and HORTON and HENDRY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff s complaint alleging a conspiracy was dismissed and he appealed. The question presented is whether it stated a cause of action for civil conspiracy. We hold that it did not because the allegations purporting to state a cause of action in conspiracy must be clear, positive and specific. Gair v. Lockhart, Fla.1950, 47 So.2d 826.
The complaint before us sought to imply a conspiracy from the discharge of the plaintiff who was employed for an indefinite term. Such a discharge is not prima facie illegal. Hope v. National Airlines, Fla.App.1957, 99 So.2d 244.
Affirmed.