Case Name: Preston T. JENKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Stephen O. SIMPSON; Paul A. Loconti, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-01-03
Citations: 161 F. App'x 269
Docket Number: No. 05-7309
Parties: Preston T. JENKINS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Stephen O. SIMPSON; Paul A. Loconti, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 161
Pages: 269–269

Head Matter:
Preston T. JENKINS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Stephen O. SIMPSON; Paul A. Loconti, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 05-7309.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 22, 2005.
Decided: Jan. 3, 2006.
Preston T. Jenkins, Appellant Pro Se. Alexander Francuzenko, O’Connell, O’Connell & Sarsfield, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Preston T. Jenkins appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Jenkins v. Simpson, No. CA-05-694-JCC (E.D.Va. June 22 and July 20, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED