Case Name: Arnold CLARK, Petitioner, v. The Honorable Edward N. MOORE, as Judge of the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida, in and for Dade County, Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1984-03-13
Citations: 447 So. 2d 383
Docket Number: No. 84-118
Parties: Arnold CLARK, Petitioner, v. The Honorable Edward N. MOORE, as Judge of the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida, in and for Dade County, Respondent.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and FERGUSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 447
Pages: 383–383

Head Matter:
Arnold CLARK, Petitioner, v. The Honorable Edward N. MOORE, as Judge of the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida, in and for Dade County, Respondent.
No. 84-118.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 13, 1984.
Rehearing Denied April 10, 1984.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Karen M. Gottlieb and Bruce Rosen-thal, Asst. Public Defenders, for petitioner.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Richard E. Doran, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and FERGUSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Based on the controlling authority of Healey v. State, 389 So.2d 278 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), we grant the petition for a writ of prohibition herein and direct that the respondent trial judge grant the petitioner's motion for discharge filed below. As the respondent, through counsel, concedes, Healey is factually indistinguishable from the instant case and compels the result we reach today. We will withhold issuance of a formal writ of prohibition as we are confident that the respondent will discharge the petitioner upon receipt of this opinion.
Prohibition granted.