Case Name: Kedist GIRMA, Appellant v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-06-01
Citations: 468 F. App'x 7
Docket Number: No. 12-5069
Parties: Kedist GIRMA, Appellant v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Appellee.
Judges: BEFORE: SENTELLE, Chief Judge, and ROGERS and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 468
Pages: 7–8

Head Matter:
Kedist GIRMA, Appellant v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Appellee.
No. 12-5069.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
June 1, 2012.
Kedist Girma, Washington, DC, pro se.
R. Craig Lawrence, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Washington, DC, for Appellee.
BEFORE: SENTELLE, Chief Judge, and ROGERS and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief and appendix filed by the appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's dismissal of appellant's complaint be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed the complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(j). See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 327-28, 109 S.Ct. 1827, 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989).
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.