Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Frank Howard BLUM, Defendant and Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1972-02-09
Citations: 453 F.2d 1378
Docket Number: No. 71-2011
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Frank Howard BLUM, Defendant and Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 453
Pages: 1378–1378

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Frank Howard BLUM, Defendant and Appellant.
No. 71-2011.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Feb. 9, 1972.
Ron Bain (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellant.
David P. Curnow, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Robert L. Meyer, U. S. Atty., Eric A. Nobles, Chief, Crim. Division, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before CHAMBERS, CARTER and CHOY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The appeal from the order entered on a post conviction hearing is affirmed. The hearing was required by this court 432 F.2d 250 on the authority of Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368, 84 S.Ct. 1774, 12 L.Ed.2d 908 (1964).
We find that the defendant's confession (or admissions) was properly admitted in evidence and the co-defendant's stipulated testimony was properly received.