Case Name: Antonieo D. CLARK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2018-05-15
Citations: 547 S.W.3d 161
Docket Number: No. ED 105375
Parties: Antonieo D. CLARK, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 547
Pages: 161–161

Head Matter:
Antonieo D. CLARK, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 105375
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Filed: May 15, 2018
Alexandria A. Shah, Saint Louis, MO, for appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., Angela T. Quigless, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Antonieo D. Clark appeals from a judgment denying his Mo. Sup. Ct. Rule 29.15 (2014) amended motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. Sup. Ct. Rule 84.16(b) (2018).