Case Name: Deloris BERLIN, Personal Representative of the Estate of Christopher L. Harris, Appellant, v. Harrell REID, Sheriff of Hamilton County Sheriff's Department, Hamilton County Sheriff's Department, Joe C. Peavy, Sheriff of Madison County Sheriff's Department, and Madison County Sheriff's Department, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-03-09
Citations: 755 So. 2d 731
Docket Number: Nos. 1D97-4637, 1D98-2900
Parties: Deloris BERLIN, Personal Representative of the Estate of Christopher L. Harris, Appellant, v. Harrell REID, Sheriff of Hamilton County Sheriff's Department, Hamilton County Sheriff's Department, Joe C. Peavy, Sheriff of Madison County Sheriff's Department, and Madison County Sheriff's Department, Appellees.
Judges: ERVIN, MINER and VAN NORTWICK, JJ„ CONCUR.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 755
Pages: 731–731

Head Matter:
Deloris BERLIN, Personal Representative of the Estate of Christopher L. Harris, Appellant, v. Harrell REID, Sheriff of Hamilton County Sheriff's Department, Hamilton County Sheriff's Department, Joe C. Peavy, Sheriff of Madison County Sheriff's Department, and Madison County Sheriff's Department, Appellees.
Nos. 1D97-4637, 1D98-2900.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
March 9, 2000.
William Kemper Jennings, Fort Walton Beach, for Appellant.
Gayle Smith Swedmark and Barbara C. Fromm of Skelding, Labasky, Corry, Hau-ser, Jolly, Metz & Daws, P.A., Tallahassee for Appellees Sheriff Harrell Reid and the Hamilton County Sheriffs Department; John C. Cooper and Laurie B. Woodham of Cooper, Coppins, & Monroe, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellees Sheriff Joe C. Peavy and the Madison County Sheriffs Department.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In these consolidated appeals, appellant seeks review of final summary judgments entered against her in a wrongful death action. The record shows that appellant's decedent was a passenger in a stolen automobile fleeing from the police. Based upon these facts, we conclude as a matter of law that appellees owed no duty of care to appellant's decedent. See Robinson v. City of Detroit, 225 Mich.App. 14, 571 N.W.2d 34 (1997), appeal granted, 458 Mich. 860, 587 N.W.2d 637 (1998); Jackson v. Oliver, 204 Mich.App. 122, 514 N.W.2d 195 (1994). In view of our disposition, we do not reach appellant's remaining issues.
AFFIRMED.
ERVIN, MINER and VAN NORTWICK, JJ" CONCUR.