Case Name: Rufus Julius Cornelius ANDERSON, a/k/a Rufus Julius C. Anderson, a/k/a Rufus J. Anderson, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GREENVILLE HEALTH SYSTEM, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-04-28
Citations: 687 F. App'x 281
Docket Number: No. 17-1062
Parties: Rufus Julius Cornelius ANDERSON, a/k/a Rufus Julius C. Anderson, a/k/a Rufus J. Anderson, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GREENVILLE HEALTH SYSTEM, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 687
Pages: 281–282

Head Matter:
Rufus Julius Cornelius ANDERSON, a/k/a Rufus Julius C. Anderson, a/k/a Rufus J. Anderson, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GREENVILLE HEALTH SYSTEM, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 17-1062
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 25, 2017
Decided: April 28, 2017
Rufus J. C. Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. David Lee Harris, Jr., Michael Montgomery Shetterly, OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Green-ville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Rufus Julius Cornelius Anderson appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting Defendant's motion to dismiss his employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Anderson's motion for an order of protection or restraining order, deny his motion for a subpoena, grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Anderson v. Greenville Health Sys., No. 6:16-cv-01051-MGL, 2016 WL 6405751 (D.S.C. Oct. 31, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED