Case Name: HOWARD L. BEAZELL, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. EUGENE SCHRADER, Defendant and Respondent
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1962-07-16
Citations: 205 Cal. App. 673
Docket Number: Civ. No. 26165
Parties: HOWARD L. BEAZELL, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. EUGENE SCHRADER, Defendant and Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports, Second Series
Volume: 205
Pages: 673–674

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 26165.
Second Dist., Div. Four.
July 16, 1962.]
HOWARD L. BEAZELL, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. EUGENE SCHRADER, Defendant and Respondent.
Milton Zerin for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Thomas E. Garcin for Defendant and Respondent.

Opinion:
BURKE, P. J.
Plaintiff purports to appeal from an order sustaining without leave to amend defendant's demurrer to a first amended complaint.
On November 3, 1961, a minute order was entered sustaining defendant's demurrer to first amended complaint without leave to amend for failure to state a cause of action within the jurisdiction of the superior court. No judgment thereon has been entered.
[ 1 ] It is well settled that an order sustaining a demurrer without leave to amend is not an appealable order or a final judgment. A reviewing court does not have jurisdiction to review an appeal of this type. (Tellefsen v. Key System Transit Lines, 187 Cal.App.2d 44 [9 Cal.Rptr. 299]; Futlick v. F. W. Woolworth Co., 149 Cal.App.2d 296, 298 [308 P.2d 405]; Schmidt v. Townsend, 103 Cal.App.2d 185, 186-187 [229 P.2d 488]; see also 3 Witkin, Cal. Procedure, § 19, p. 2162.)
The purported appeal is dismissed.
J efferson, J., and Balthis, J., concurred.