Case Name: Robert B. Nooney, Resp't, v. The New York Elevated R. R. Co. et al., App'lts
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1891-12-31
Citations: 43 N.Y. St. Rep. 360
Docket Number: 
Parties: Robert B. Nooney, Resp’t, v. The New York Elevated R. R. Co. et al., App’lts.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 43
Pages: 360–361

Head Matter:
Robert B. Nooney, Resp’t, v. The New York Elevated R. R. Co. et al., App’lts.
(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department,
Filed December 31, 1891.)
1. Railroads—Elevated—Damages.
In an action against an elevated railroad, past damages may be recovered by the owner of premises, although they have been in the possession! of tenants.
2. Same.
In such action, damages down to the time of the trial may be recovered.
Appeal from a judgment entered upon the report of a referee.
Henry Gr. Atwater, for resp’t; Julien T. Davies and Joseph E... Lord, for app’lts.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
No question of importance is presented in this-case. The findings of fact are well supported by evidence,- and the sums awarded for past damages and fee value are fair and reasonable.
The appellants' point that it was error to award past damages, because the property had been in the possession of tenants holding under the plaintiff for several years prior to the commencement of the action, has been decided against them so frequently that further reference to it is superfluous.
As to the award of damages down to the time of the trial, see. the opinion handed down in the case of Kane against these same defendants, 42 St Eep., 415.
The judgment should he affirmed, with costs.
YIn Brunt, P. J., Barrett and Andrews, JJ., concur.