Case Name: In re: Daniel DOYON, Debtor. Marc L. Jordan, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. George W. Liebmann, Defendant-Appellee, Heidi Richardson, Creditor-Appellee, United States Trustee for the District of Maryland, Trustee-Appellee, and Joel P. Goldberger, Trustee, and Daniel Doyon; Oregon College Savings Plan, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-07-06
Citations: 138 F. App'x 524
Docket Number: No. 04-2323
Parties: In re: Daniel DOYON, Debtor. Marc L. Jordan, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. George W. Liebmann, Defendant—Appellee, Heidi Richardson, Creditor—Appellee, United States Trustee for the District of Maryland, Trustee—Appellee, and Joel P. Goldberger, Trustee, and Daniel Doyon; Oregon College Savings Plan, Defendants.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Bankruptcy Reporter
Volume: 333
Pages: 524–524

Head Matter:
In re: Daniel DOYON, Debtor. Marc L. Jordan, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. George W. Liebmann, Defendant—Appellee, Heidi Richardson, Creditor—Appellee, United States Trustee for the District of Maryland, Trustee—Appellee, and Joel P. Goldberger, Trustee, and Daniel Doyon; Oregon College Savings Plan, Defendants.
No. 04-2323.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 25, 2005.
Decided: July 6, 2005.
Marc L. Jordan, Jordan & Tell, L.L.P., Columbia, Maryland, Appellant Pro Se. Orbie R. Shively, George W. Liebmann, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland; Michael J. Avenatti, Prescott A. Baier, Santa Monica, California; Clarkson McDow, United States Trustee, Donald F. Walton, Acting General Counsel, Paul W. Bridenhagen, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 86(c).
PER CURIAM:
Marc L. Jordan, an attorney, appeals the district court's order affirming the bankruptcy court's order limiting his fees in the underlying bankruptcy proceeding. We have reviewed the record included on appeal, including the opinions of both courts below, as well as the parties' briefs and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jordan v. Liebmann (In re Doyon), Nos. CA-04-50-WMN; BK-02-66141-SD (D.Md. Oct. 1, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED