Case Name: Alexander SHUKH, Plaintiff-Appellant v. SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, LLC, Seagate Technology, Inc., Seagate Technology, Defendants-Appellees. Unknown Owners and Assignees, Defendant. Seagate Technology PLC, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-10-02
Citations: 618 F. App'x 678
Docket Number: No. 2015-1012
Parties: Alexander SHUKH, Plaintiff-Appellant v. SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, LLC, Seagate Technology, Inc., Seagate Technology, Defendants-Appellees. Unknown Owners and Assignees, Defendant. Seagate Technology PLC, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before MOORE, WALLACH, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 618
Pages: 678–678

Head Matter:
Alexander SHUKH, Plaintiff-Appellant v. SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, LLC, Seagate Technology, Inc., Seagate Technology, Defendants-Appellees. Unknown Owners and Assignees, Defendant. Seagate Technology PLC, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 2015-1012.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Oct. 2, 2015.
Constantine John Gekas, Gekas Law Ltd., Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiff-appellant.
Chad Drown, Faegre Baker Daniels LLP, Minneapolis, MN, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by David J.F. Gross, Charles Feeney Knapp, Elizabeth Cowan Wright, Aaron D. Van Oort; Calvin L. Litsey, East Palo Alto, CA.
Before MOORE, WALLACH, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In light of our holding in Shukh v. Seagate Technology, LLC, Case No. 14-1406, vacating and remanding in part the district court's judgment on the merits against Alexander Shukh, we vacate and remand the district court's costs judgment.
VACATED AND REMANDED
Costs
No costs.