Case Name: Nancy KRAFT, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. Charles KING, Ken McIntyre, Gary Meredith and Richard Riggle, Appellees-Defendants
Court: Court of Appeals of Indiana
Jurisdiction: Indiana
Decision Date: 1992-06-08
Citations: 592 N.E.2d 1259
Docket Number: No. 10A04-9108-CV-262
Parties: Nancy KRAFT, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. Charles KING, Ken McIntyre, Gary Meredith and Richard Riggle, Appellees-Defendants.
Judges: CHEZEM, J., concurs.
Reporter: North Eastern Reporter 2d
Volume: 592
Pages: 1259–1260

Head Matter:
Nancy KRAFT, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. Charles KING, Ken McIntyre, Gary Meredith and Richard Riggle, Appellees-Defendants.
No. 10A04-9108-CV-262.
Court of Appeals of Indiana, Fourth District.
June 8, 1992.
John A. Kraft, New Albany, for appellant-plaintiff.
John W. Doehrman, Jeffersonville, for appellees-defendants.

Opinion:
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
CONOVER, Judge.
Kraft now petitions for rehearing and contends this court erred in its interpretation of IND.CODE 3-12-8-6. In order to clear up any misconceptions, we address her contention below.
IC 3-12-8-6 establishes the requirements of a petition under the election statutes. In discussing the statute, we inadvertently quoted subsections (a)(3)(C) and (D), which did not take effect until after Kraft's election contest was filed. These subsections were quoted only for the purpose of showing the available grounds for an election contest. They had no bearing on the outcome of the case.
Rehearing denied.
CHEZEM, J., concurs.
SULLIVAN, J., would grant rehearing and reverse the judgment of the trial court.