Case Name: Sigmund Sommer, Appellant-Respondent, v. General Bronze Corporation, Respondent-Appellant, et al., Respondents; Hays, Algase, Feuer, Porter & Spanier, Respondent, v. Sigmund Sommer, Appellant-Respondent, and General Bronze Corporation, Respondent-Appellant, et al., Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1968-04-11
Citations: 21 N.Y.2d 989
Docket Number: 
Parties: Sigmund Sommer, Appellant-Respondent, v. General Bronze Corporation, Respondent-Appellant, et al., Respondents. Hays, Algase, Feuer, Porter & Spanier, Respondent, v. Sigmund Sommer, Appellant-Respondent, and General Bronze Corporation, Respondent-Appellant, et al., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 21
Pages: 989–989

Head Matter:
Sigmund Sommer, Appellant-Respondent, v. General Bronze Corporation, Respondent-Appellant, et al., Respondents. Hays, Algase, Feuer, Porter & Spanier, Respondent, v. Sigmund Sommer, Appellant-Respondent, and General Bronze Corporation, Respondent-Appellant, et al., Respondent.
Submitted April 1, 1968;
decided April 11, 1968.

Opinion:
Motion to amend remittitur denied. Since cross appeals are here involved, neither party is entitled to costs. With respect to interest, there is no need for any amendment since, as we read the Appellate Division opinion, the proceeds of the letter of credit, to which defendant-respondent-appellant is entitled, include interest (as sought by said party) upon the escrow deposit of $400,000. [See 21 N Y 2d 775.]