Case Name: In the Matter of the Claim of Mike Angelo, Respondent, against Triangle Broom and Brush Company, Respondent, and Home Indemnity Company of New York, Appellant. State Industrial Board, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1935-03
Citations: 243 A.D. 838
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Claim of Mike Angelo, Respondent, against Triangle Broom and Brush Company, Respondent, and Home Indemnity Company of New York, Appellant. State Industrial Board, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 243
Pages: 838–838

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Claim of Mike Angelo, Respondent, against Triangle Broom and Brush Company, Respondent, and Home Indemnity Company of New York, Appellant. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

Opinion:
The question is of coverage. The policy was issued to a copartnersMp. One of the partners retired and the remaining partner continued the business under the same name at the same place. Claimant was injured wMle employed by the business being conducted by the remaining partner. (Matter of Lipschitz v. Hotel Charles, 252 N. Y. 518.) Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.