Case Name: Rajaee A. POOLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUPERVALU HOLDINGS, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-02-17
Citations: 122 F. App'x 49
Docket Number: No. 04-2097
Parties: Rajaee A. POOLER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. SUPERVALU HOLDINGS, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before WIDENER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 122
Pages: 49–49

Head Matter:
Rajaee A. POOLER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. SUPERVALU HOLDINGS, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 04-2097.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 28, 2005.
Decided: Feb. 17, 2005.
Rajaee A. Pooler, Appellant pro se.
Charles Garrison Meyer, III, Vijay Kumar Mago, Leclair Ryan, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WIDENER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Rajaee A. Pooler appeals the district court's order adopting the reasoning set forth in the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, and granting summary judgment in favor of Supervalu Holdings, Inc. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Pooler v. Supervalu Holdings, Inc., No. CA-03-275-3 (E.D.Va. July 23, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED