Case Name: In re Anonymous No. 149
Court: Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1977-08-15
Citations: 8 Pa. D. & C.3d 111
Docket Number: Disciplinary Docket no. 149
Parties: In re Anonymous No. 149
Judges: 
Reporter: Pennsylvania District and County Reports
Volume: 8
Pages: 111–113

Head Matter:
In re Anonymous No. 149
Disciplinary Docket no. 149.
August 15, 1977,

Opinion:
ORDER
EAGEN, C.J.,
And now it appearing that [respondent] has been suspended for a period of three months by the United States Patent and Trademark Office before the Commissioner of Patent and Trademark, as a Patent Agent in applications before the United States Patent and Trademark Office; and that respondent was directed to inform this court why imposition of an identical sentence in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and upon receipt of the statement of respondent in answer thereto and consideration thereof by this court; it is ordered and decreed, as provided by Rule 204(3) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement, that respondent be publicly censured at the session of the Supreme Court commencing October 17, 1977, at Philadelphia.