Case Name: HAROLD COURTER, PROSECUTOR, v. THOMAS PEER, RECORDER OF THE TOWNSHIP OF CALDWELL, ET AL., RESPONDENTS
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1926-10-21
Citations: 4 N.J. Misc. 865
Docket Number: 
Parties: HAROLD COURTER, PROSECUTOR, v. THOMAS PEER, RECORDER OF THE TOWNSHIP OF CALDWELL, ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 4
Pages: 865–865

Head Matter:
HAROLD COURTER, PROSECUTOR, v. THOMAS PEER, RECORDER OF THE TOWNSHIP OF CALDWELL, ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Decided October 21, 1926.
Before Justices Parker, Black and Campbell.
Eor the prosecutor, J. Chester Massinger.
Eor the respondents, Edward J. Katzenbach and Grover C. Bichman.

Opinion:
Peb Curiam.
This matter is before us in all respects and with the same reasons urged as in Alois Rou, Prosecutor, v. Thomas Peer et al., No. 280 of this term, and our conclusion is that the writ of certiorari must be dismissed for the same reasons given in case No. 280.