Case Name: STEEL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, Appellant, v. Anastazia KAZANOWSKI, Adm'x, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1950-04-13
Citations: 181 F.2d 189
Docket Number: No. 11035
Parties: STEEL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, Appellant, v. Anastazia KAZANOWSKI, Adm’x, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 181
Pages: 189–190

Head Matter:
STEEL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, Appellant, v. Anastazia KAZANOWSKI, Adm’x, Appellee.
No. 11035.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
April 13, 1950.
Carl F. Davidson, Detroit, Mich., for appellant.
Davidow & Davidow, Detroit, Mich., for appellee.
Before HICKS, Chief Judge, and ALLEN and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This case came on to he heard on the briefs and record and oral argument of counsel;
And it appearing that the principal questions presented arise out of issues of fact which were properly presented to the jury; Kerns v. Lewis, 249 Mich. 27, 30, 227 N. W. 727; Breger v. Feigenson Bros. Co., 264 Mich. 37, 41, 249 N.W. 493; Phillips v. Fotheringham, 277 Mich. 566, 571, 269 N. W. 600; Reitenga v. Kalamazoo Creamery Co., 288 Mich. 161, 165, 284 N.W. 683; and that the verdict is supported by substantial evidence;
And it appearing that the District Court correctly charged the jury upon the appli cable law, and that no error is assigned to the charge;
And no reversible error appearing in the record:
It is ordered that the judgment be, and it hereby is, affirmed.