Case Name: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM SAPP, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1976-10-20
Citations: 71 N.J. 476
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM SAPP, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 71
Pages: 476–477

Head Matter:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM SAPP, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Argued September 27, 1976
Decided October 20, 1976.
Mr. Philip Bib erg, Designated Counsel, argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Stanley G. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney).
Mr. William F. Bolán, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General of Hew Jersey, attorney; Ms. Barbara Ann Villano, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel and on the brief).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment is reversed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Morgan in her dissenting opinion. 144 N. J. Super. 455 at 460.
Three members of the Court would affirm substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division.
For reversal—Chief Justice Hughes, Justices P ashman and Clifford and Judge Oonfoed—4.
For affirmance—Justices Mountain, Sullivan and Sghreiber—3.