Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael HILL, a/k/a Saleet, a/k/a Steve Philip, a/k/a Junito Tomilson, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-05-28
Citations: 573 F. App'x 251
Docket Number: No. 13-8043
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael HILL, a/k/a Saleet, a/k/a Steve Philip, a/k/a Junito Tomilson, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 573
Pages: 251–251

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael HILL, a/k/a Saleet, a/k/a Steve Philip, a/k/a Junito Tomilson, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-8043.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 22, 2014.
Decided: May 28, 2014.
Michael Hill, Appellant Pro Se. John Samuel Bowler, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Ap-pellee.
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. •
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael Hill appeals the district court's order denying his motion for modification of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hill, No. 7:96-cr-00042-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 18, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.