Case Name: Kenneth BRANTLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. Nebraska Department of Labor, Movant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-03-12
Citations: 595 F. App'x 659
Docket Number: No. 14-1661
Parties: Kenneth BRANTLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. Nebraska Department of Labor, Movant.
Judges: Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 595
Pages: 659–659

Head Matter:
Kenneth BRANTLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. Nebraska Department of Labor, Movant.
No. 14-1661.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 4, 2015.
Filed: March 12, 2015.
Kenneth Brantley, Lincoln, NE, pro se.
Nichole S. Bogén, Andrew David Weeks, Sattler & Bogen, Lincoln, NE, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this pro se employment-discrimination action, Kenneth Brantley appeals the district court's dismissal with prejudice. Upon careful review of the parties' arguments on appeal and the circumstances of this case, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(b)(2), (d), 41(b); Sentis Group, Inc. v. Shell Oil Co., 559 F.3d 888, 898-99 (8th Cir.2009) (standard of review for dismissal under Rule 37); Smith v. Gold Dust Casino, 526 F.3d 402, 404-05 (8th Cir.2008) (standard of review for dismissal under Rule 41(b)). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Cheryl R. Zwart, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Nebraska.