Case Name: U.S. v. Damien J. Autry
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-06-29
Citations: 70 M.J. 222
Docket Number: No. 11-0514/NA
Parties: U.S. v. Damien J. Autry.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Military Justice Reporter
Volume: 70
Pages: 222–222

Head Matter:
Wednesday, June 29, 2011
No. 11-0514/NA.
U.S. v. Damien J. Autry.

Opinion:
CCA 201100105. Review granted on the following issues:
WHETHER AN ARTICLE 134 CLAUSE 1 OR 2 SPECIFICATION THAT FAILS TO EXPRESSLY ALLEGE EITHER POTENTIAL TERMINAL ELEMENT STATES AN OFFENSE UNDER THE SUPREME COURT'S HOLDINGS IN UNITED STATES v. RESENDIZ-PONCE AND RUSSELL v. UNITED STATES, AND THIS COURT'S RECENT OPINIONS IN MEDINA, MILLER AND JONES.
No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.