Case Name: In the Matter of Water Right and Electrical Company, Inc., Petitioner, against William A. Kaercher et al., as Commissioners of Appraisal, Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1951-12-28
Citations: 200 Misc. 1107
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Water Right and Electrical Company, Inc., Petitioner, against William A. Kaercher et al., as Commissioners of Appraisal, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 200
Pages: 1107–1107

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Water Right and Electrical Company, Inc., Petitioner, against William A. Kaercher et al., as Commissioners of Appraisal, Respondents.
Supreme Court, Special Term, Ulster County,
December 28, 1951.
Charles F. Preusse for petitioner.
Denis M. Hurley, Corporation Counsel (Robert E. Hugh of counsel), for respondents.

Opinion:
Bookstein, J.
It is true that the commissioners are " to hear, consider and determine upon all claims which may be presented to them under the provisions of this article." (Administrative Code of City of New York, § K41-12.0.) They are limited, however, to a finding of the value of the claimant's property taken by eminent domain. They are not empowered to hear and determine title to property. (See unreported opinion of Mr. Justice Foster, Sup. Ct., Ulster Co., April 33, 1944, in Matter of Gillespie — Rondout Riparian Section 2, Ulster Co. — Parcel No. 48 [TVenig].)
Orderly procedure requires that the question of title should first be determined in an appropriate forum having jurisdiction to render a binding determination.
Under the circumstances here existing, it would be an abuse of discretion to grant the relief sought.
Petition dismissed, without costs.
Submit order.