Case Name: Robert CRANDALL, Plaintiff, v. EUREKA FLUID WORKS, Third Party Plaintiff/Appellant, v. BORDEN CHEMICAL COMPANY, Third Party Defendant/Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1987-01-27
Citations: 808 F.2d 1365
Docket Number: No. 86-1741
Parties: Robert CRANDALL, Plaintiff, v. EUREKA FLUID WORKS, Third Party Plaintiff/Appellant, v. BORDEN CHEMICAL COMPANY, Third Party Defendant/Appellee.
Judges: Before NELSON, KOZINSKI and NOONAN, Jr., Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 808
Pages: 1365–1366

Head Matter:
Robert CRANDALL, Plaintiff, v. EUREKA FLUID WORKS, Third Party Plaintiff/Appellant, v. BORDEN CHEMICAL COMPANY, Third Party Defendant/Appellee.
No. 86-1741.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Jan. 15, 1987.
Decided Jan. 27, 1987.
Stephen Kimble, Tucson, Ariz., for third party plaintiff-appellant.
John Dames, Chicago, Ill., for third party defendant-appellee.
Before NELSON, KOZINSKI and NOONAN, Jr., Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
The district court did not abuse its discretion in its partial denial of the motion for summary judgment filed by Third Party Plaintiff/Appellant, Eureka Fluid Works, and in its grant of the motion for a directed verdict filed by Third Party Defendant/Appellee, Borden Chemical Company.
AFFIRMED.