Case Name: Emeline Lee, App'lt, v. Mary A. Timken, Resp't
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1894-10-12
Citations: 62 N.Y. St. Rep. 764
Docket Number: 
Parties: Emeline Lee, App’lt, v. Mary A. Timken, Resp’t.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 62
Pages: 764–764

Head Matter:
Emeline Lee, App’lt, v. Mary A. Timken, Resp’t.
(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department,
Filed October 12, 1894.)
Appeal—What appealable.
An order sustaining or overruling a demurrer is not appealable.
Appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.
V. W. Kingsley, for app’lt; George K Mott, for resp’t.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
As we have had occasion to point out in the case of Sheffield v. Robinson (decided herewith) 62 St. Rep. 763; 30 N. Y. Supp. 799, an order sustaining or overruling a demurrer is not appealable; the appeal must be from the judgment. Appeal accordingly dismissed, with $10 costs and disbursements.