Case Name: John Wayne McLAUGHLIN-COX, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARYLAND PAROLE COMMISSION, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-01-16
Citations: 85 F. App'x 903
Docket Number: No. 03-7415
Parties: John Wayne McLAUGHLIN-COX, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. MARYLAND PAROLE COMMISSION, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before LUTTIG, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 85
Pages: 903–903

Head Matter:
John Wayne McLAUGHLIN-COX, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. MARYLAND PAROLE COMMISSION, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 03-7415.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 18, 2003.
Decided Jan. 16, 2004.
John McLaughlin-Cox, Appellant pro se. Susan Howe Baron, Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before LUTTIG, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
John McLaughlin-Cox appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See McLaughlin-Cox v. Maryland Parole Comm'n, No. CA-02-4204-MJG (D.Md. Aug. 15, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED