Case Name: Aleksandr SHVARTS, Appellant, v. A. Lewis O'CONNOR and Alice W. O'Connor, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1997-04-23
Citations: 692 So. 2d 960
Docket Number: Nos. 96-2831, 96-3497
Parties: Aleksandr SHVARTS, Appellant, v. A. Lewis O’CONNOR and Alice W. O’Connor, Appellees.
Judges: WARNER, POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 692
Pages: 960–960

Head Matter:
Aleksandr SHVARTS, Appellant, v. A. Lewis O’CONNOR and Alice W. O’Connor, Appellees.
Nos. 96-2831, 96-3497.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
April 23, 1997.
Paul R. Lipton and Michele A. Maracini of Bedzow, Korn & Kan, PA., Aventura, and Joaquina M. Lazaro and Michael R. Koblenz of Mound, Cotton & Wollan, New York City, for appellant.
Robert R. Edwards of Jennings, Valancy & Edwards, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for ap-pellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm case no. 96-2831. In case no. 96-3497, the O'Connors appealed an order determining the amount of a superse-deas bond on appeal. Review of such an order is by motion. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.310(f). Had review been sought in this matter, it would have been disposed of by us months ago. Instead, by designating it as an appeal, it followed the lengthy course of all full appeals. As we have affirmed the lower court's ruling on the merits in case no. 96-2831, the issue regarding the supersedeas bond is now moot.
WARNER, POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.