Case Name: Arthur Puro, Appellant, v. Louis Puro et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1975-02-17
Citations: 36 N.Y.2d 689
Docket Number: 
Parties: Arthur Puro, Appellant, v. Louis Puro et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 36
Pages: 689–690

Head Matter:
Arthur Puro, Appellant, v. Louis Puro et al., Respondents.
Submitted January 27, 1975;
decided February 17, 1975.
Nathan Cooper for motion.
Edward N. Costikyan and Ambrose Doskow opposed.

Opinion:
Motion dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. (See Behren v. Papworth, 30 N Y 2d 532; Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, § 21, pp. 92-93.)