Case Name: Agha Navid GUL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. RICHLAND COUNTY COURT, COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-11-22
Citations: 112 F. App'x 941
Docket Number: No. 04-7292
Parties: Agha Navid GUL, Petitioner—Appellant, v. RICHLAND COUNTY COURT, COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondent—Appellee.
Judges: Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 112
Pages: 941–941

Head Matter:
Agha Navid GUL, Petitioner—Appellant, v. RICHLAND COUNTY COURT, COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondent—Appellee.
No. 04-7292.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 10, 2004.
Decided Nov. 22, 2004.
Agha Navid Gul, Appellant pro se.
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Agha Navid Gul appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice his civil action against the Richland County Court. We grant Gul's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Gul v. Richland County, No. CA-04-720-4-26BH (D.S.C. June 7, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED