Case Name: Maurice HANCOCK, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-10-24
Citations: 204 S.W.3d 330
Docket Number: No. ED 87623
Parties: Maurice HANCOCK, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 204
Pages: 330–331

Head Matter:
Maurice HANCOCK, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 87623.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Oct. 24, 2006.
Jessica M. Hathaway, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, Stephanie Mor-rell, Assistant Attorneys General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Maurice Hancock, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).