Case Name: Michael W. MILLER, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2010-05-11
Citations: 310 S.W.3d 303
Docket Number: No. ED 93113
Parties: Michael W. MILLER, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before: KURT S. ODENWALD, P.J., GEORGE W. DRAPER III, and GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 310
Pages: 303–304

Head Matter:
Michael W. MILLER, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 93113.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
May 11, 2010.
Matthew Ward, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Karen L. Kramer, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before: KURT S. ODENWALD, P.J., GEORGE W. DRAPER III, and GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Michael W. Miller appeals from the motion court's judgment denying, following an evidentiary hearing, his amended Motion under Rule 29.15 to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence and Request for Evidentiary Hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2009, unless otherwise indicated.