Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Larry W. SKAGGS, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2007-12-18
Citations: 241 S.W.3d 421
Docket Number: No. ED 89133
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Larry W. SKAGGS, Appellant.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J. and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR. and KENNETH M. ROMINES, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 241
Pages: 421–421

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Larry W. SKAGGS, Appellant.
No. ED 89133.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Dec. 18, 2007.
Irene C. Earns, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Karen L. Kramer, Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J. and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR. and KENNETH M. ROMINES, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Larry W. Skaggs ("Skaggs") appeals from the judgment upon his conviction of two counts of first-degree robbery and two counts of armed criminal action. Skaggs argues the trial court plainly erred in overruling defense counsel's objection to Detective George Grove's ("Detective Grove") testimony as to what Mario Moran ("Moran") told him because the testimony was hearsay and prejudicial.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).