Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kevin Keith FURLONG, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-12-16
Citations: 83 F. App'x 244
Docket Number: No. 03-30100; D.C. No. CR-93-00017-1-CCL
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kevin Keith FURLONG, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 83
Pages: 244–245

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kevin Keith FURLONG, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 03-30100.
D.C. No. CR-93-00017-1-CCL.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 8, 2003.
Decided Dec. 16, 2003.
Bernard F. Hubley, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Helena, MT, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee.
Melissa Harrison, David C. Avery, Federal Defender, Missoula, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before GOODWIN, WALLACE, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Kevin Keith Furlong appeals the district court's judgment revoking supervised release and imposing a 24-month term of imprisonment, following his violations of special conditions set forth in his original sentence for possession of an unregistered firearm in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5841 and 5861.
Counsel for Furlong has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating that he is unable to find any grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Furlong has filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Our examination of the briefs and independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no grounds for relief. Counsel's motion to withdraw is therefore GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.