Case Name: GOULD v. DUFFY
Court: Minnesota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Minnesota
Decision Date: 1901-02-08
Citations: 82 Minn. 425
Docket Number: Nos. 12,465—(237)
Parties: GOULD v. DUFFY.
Judges: 
Reporter: Minnesota Reports
Volume: 82
Pages: 425–425

Head Matter:
GOULD v. DUFFY.
(February 8, 1901).
Nos. 12,465—(237).
Action in the district court for Polk county to recover $1,000. The case was tried before Watts, J., and a jury, which rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.
Affirmed.
A. A. Miller and Tracy B. Bangs, for appellant.
Montague & Morrison and De Forest Buclden, for respondent.
Reported in 85 N. W. 1135.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
There are no assignments of error in this case, except those which go to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, and the other questions discussed by appellant will not be considered. The record having been' examined, and the verdict found to be sustained by the evidence, the order of the trial court denying the motion for a new trial is affirmed.