Case Name: HARRY D. AUSTRIAN, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. JULIUS LAUBHEIM, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1910-11-14
Citations: 80 N.J.L. 459
Docket Number: 
Parties: HARRY D. AUSTRIAN, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. JULIUS LAUBHEIM, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 80
Pages: 459–459

Head Matter:
HARRY D. AUSTRIAN, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. JULIUS LAUBHEIM, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Argued June 29, 1910
Decided November 14, 1910.
On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 49 Vroom 178.
Eor the plaintiff in error, Merritt Lane and Harry Lane.
Por the defendant in error, Warren Dixon.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Garrison, Trenohard, Bergen, Yoorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Yeoom, Dill, Congdon, JJ. 11.
For reversal—None.