Case Name: Nidelka BENSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mrs. Mary HINMAN; Mrs. Gail Ford; Mrs. Carol Ewing, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-12-03
Citations: 256 F. App'x 613
Docket Number: No. 07-1629
Parties: Nidelka BENSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Mrs. Mary HINMAN; Mrs. Gail Ford; Mrs. Carol Ewing, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 256
Pages: 613–613

Head Matter:
Nidelka BENSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Mrs. Mary HINMAN; Mrs. Gail Ford; Mrs. Carol Ewing, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 07-1629.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 16, 2007.
Decided: Dec. 3, 2007.
Nidelka Benson, Appellant Pro Se. Gary M. Nuckols, Andrew Philip Sherrod, Hirschler, Fleischer, Richmond, Virginia; Walter Jervis Sheffield, Walter J. Sheffield, Attorney at Law PC, Fredericksburg, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Nidelka Benson appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting Defendants' motions to dismiss her complaint brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.CA. § 201-219 ("FLSA") (West 1998 & Supp.2007). We have reviewed the record and find Benson's claims, filed more than three years after their accrual, barred by the FLSA's statute of limitations. See 29 U.S.C. § 255(a) (1998). We further find the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to equitably toll the statute of limitations. We therefore affirm the district court's dismissal of Benson's complaint on this ground. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately addressed in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.