Case Name: In re ALABAMA MARBLE CO., INC., Debtor. Stephen Musilino, Sycamore Marble Company, Inc., Mediterranean Exports, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Alabama Marble Co., Inc., Blue Devil Investments, Inc., David Luce, Credit Strategy Advisors, Inc., TBGS Quarry, LLC, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-01-19
Citations: 628 F. App'x 746
Docket Number: No. 15-13733
Parties: In re ALABAMA MARBLE CO., INC., Debtor. Stephen Musilino, Sycamore Marble Company, Inc., Mediterranean Exports, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Alabama Marble Co., Inc., Blue Devil Investments, Inc., David Luce, Credit Strategy Advisors, Inc., TBGS Quarry, LLC, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before TJOFLAT, WILSON, and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 628
Pages: 746–746

Head Matter:
In re ALABAMA MARBLE CO., INC., Debtor. Stephen Musilino, Sycamore Marble Company, Inc., Mediterranean Exports, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Alabama Marble Co., Inc., Blue Devil Investments, Inc., David Luce, Credit Strategy Advisors, Inc., TBGS Quarry, LLC, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15-13733
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Jan. 19, 2016.
Harry P. Long, Law Offices of Hairy P. Long, LLC, Anniston, AL, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
Clark R. Hammond, Susan Elaine McPherson, Wallace Jordan Ratliff & Brandt, LLC, Birmingham, AL, Jennifer B. Kimble, Rumberger Kirk & Caldwell, PA, Birmingham, AL, R. Scott Williams, John D. Saxon, PC, Birmingham, AL, Charles Richard Johanson, III, Engel Hairston & Johanson, PC, Birmingham, AL, Timothy Michael Lupinacci, William G. Somerville, III, Baker Donelson Ber-man Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC, Birmingham, AL, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before TJOFLAT, WILSON, and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
After an independent review of the record, we affirm the District Court's July 20, 2015, order denying Appellants' appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Alabama. Appellants challenge a settlement agreement approved by the Bankruptcy Court, asking that this Court effectively undo all or part of that agreement. As the District Court properly held, the appellants' claims must be denied on equitable mootness grounds. See Musilino v. Ala. Marble Co. Inc., 534 B.R. 820 (N.D.Ala.2015). As such, we affirm the District Court's judgment.
AFFIRMED.