Case Name: Starsha SEWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, (WMATA), Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-12-23
Citations: 627 F. App'x 230
Docket Number: No. 15-2405
Parties: Starsha SEWELL, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, (WMATA), Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 627
Pages: 230–230

Head Matter:
Starsha SEWELL, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, (WMATA), Defendant-Appellee.
No. 15-2405.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 18, 2015.
Decided: Dec. 23, 2015.
Starsha Sewell, Appellant Pro Se. Gerard J. Stief, Associate General Counsel, Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Starsha Sewell appeals the district court's orders dismissing this action without prejudice for failure to serve process and denying her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Washington Metro. Area Transit Auth., No. 8:15-cv-01334-TDC (D. Md. Oct. 22 & Nov. 2, 2015). We deny the motions to transfer and to strike the Defendant's response. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED,