Case Name: DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK; Maya Van Rossum, the Delaware Riverkeeper, Petitioners v. SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, Respondents. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp, Intervenor Respondent. New Jersey Conservation Foundation; Stony Brook Millstone Watershed Association; Friends of Princeton Open Space, Petitioners v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection; Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp, Respondents
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-03-24
Citations: 691 F. App'x 704
Docket Number: No. 15-2122, No. 15-2158
Parties: DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK; Maya Van Rossum, the Delaware Riverkeeper, Petitioners v. SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, Respondents Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp, Intervenor Respondent New Jersey Conservation Foundation; Stony Brook Millstone Watershed Association; Friends of Princeton Open Space, Petitioners v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection; Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp, Respondents
Judges: Before: GREENAWAY, JR., SCIRICA and ROTH, Circuit Judges
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 691
Pages: 704–704

Head Matter:
DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK; Maya Van Rossum, the Delaware Riverkeeper, Petitioners v. SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, Respondents Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp, Intervenor Respondent New Jersey Conservation Foundation; Stony Brook Millstone Watershed Association; Friends of Princeton Open Space, Petitioners v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection; Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp, Respondents
No. 15-2122, No. 15-2158
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Argued on October 29, 2015
Dated: March 24, 2017
Before: GREENAWAY, JR., SCIRICA and ROTH, Circuit Judges

Opinion:
ORDER
Jane R. Roth, Circuit Judge
By letter dated February 14, 2017, the Clerk solicited comments from the Respondent and Intervenor Respondent with respect to the Court's intention to replace references to "tree clearing"-contained in the opinion with the term "tree felling." Upon consideration of the parties' responses, the Court has determined that an amended opinion will be issued. The amendment does not alter the Court's judgment previously entered on August 8, 2016.