Case Name: Anna Sterrer, Appellant, v. Olivia G. Calestine et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1982-11-11
Citations: 57 N.Y.2d 1030
Docket Number: 
Parties: Anna Sterrer, Appellant, v Olivia G. Calestine et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 57
Pages: 1030–1033

Head Matter:
Anna Sterrer, Appellant, v Olivia G. Calestine et al., Respondents.
Decided November 11, 1982
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Solomon Cohen for appellant.
Peter Voletsky and Donald G. Simmonds for respondents.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs.
Plaintiff's argument that the earlier action dealt with an implied easement over the surface of the lots rather than an express reservation with respect to sewers and repairs may have been a valid basis for appeal of the prior judgment which held defendants' title absolute and unencumbered and declared plaintiff barred from all claim to an easement in the land. Not having appealed that judgment, however, plaintiff is barred by it from maintaining the present action for the reasons stated in the Appellate Division memorandum.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.