Case Name: Dorothy CLARK, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Charles Clark, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-11-03
Citations: 80 F. App'x 453
Docket Number: No. 97-6380
Parties: Dorothy CLARK, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Charles Clark, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: MERRITT and NELSON, Circuit Judges, and OLIVER, District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 80
Pages: 453–454

Head Matter:
Dorothy CLARK, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Charles Clark, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 97-6380.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Nov. 3, 2003.
Richard Hay, Somerset, KY, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Brian D. Sullivan, Reminger & Reminger, Cleveland, OH, Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr., Thomas H. Dupree, Jr., Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Washington, DC, Lawrence A. Sutter, Sutter, O’Connell, Mannion & Farchione, Cleveland, OH, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: MERRITT and NELSON, Circuit Judges, and OLIVER, District Judge.
. The Honorable Solomon Oliver, Jr., United States District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
ORDER
On October 6, 2003, the Supreme Court of the United States granted Chrysler Corporation's petition for a writ of certiorari, vacated this court's judgment, and remanded this case for further consideration in light of State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. Campbell, 538 U.S. 408, 123 S.Ct. 1513, 155 L.Ed.2d 585 (2003). Therefore, and because the effect of State Farm should first be addressed in the district court, this case is REMANDED to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky for further proceedings in accordance with the Supreme Court's order.