Case Name: Lane Realty Company, a Copartnership Composed of Louis W. Licht, and Another, Respondents, v. Robert F. Fox et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1960-01-29
Citations: 23 Misc. 2d 892
Docket Number: 
Parties: Lane Realty Company, a Copartnership Composed of Louis W. Licht, and Another, Respondents, v. Robert F. Fox et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 23
Pages: 892–892

Head Matter:
Lane Realty Company, a Copartnership Composed of Louis W. Licht, and Another, Respondents, v. Robert F. Fox et al., Appellants.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
January 29, 1960.
Esterman <& Reich (Philip Esterman of counsel), for appellants. Sparago & Sparago (William Sparago of counsel), for respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
In this action for brokerage commissions, it was error to exclude parol evidence to show that the binder agreement was conditional (N. E. D. Holding Co. v. McKinley, 246 N. Y. 40).
The judgment should be unanimously reversed upon the law and facts and a new trial granted, with $30 costs to the defendants to abide the event.
Concur — Hart, Di Giovanna and Brown, JJ.
Judgment reversed, etc.