Case Name: Elmer E. Tarburton, complainant-appellant, v. Edna Johnson, executrix, &c., et al., defendants-respondents
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1933-04-28
Citations: 113 N.J. Eq. 138
Docket Number: 
Parties: Elmer E. Tarburton, complainant-appellant, v. Edna Johnson, executrix, &c., et al., defendants-respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 113
Pages: 138–143

Head Matter:
Elmer E. Tarburton, complainant-appellant, v. Edna Johnson, executrix, &c., et al., defendants-respondents.
[Argued February 15th, 1933.
Decided April 28th, 1933.]
Messrs. French, Richards & Bradley, for the appellant.
Mr. Franlc R. Bacon and Mr. LeRoy W. Loder, for the respondents.

Opinion:
Pee Cueiam.
The decree under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Davis as above.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Peeskie, Van Bus-kirk, Kays, Deae, Wells, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.