Case Name: Gabriel Gladstone v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act, et al.
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1987-01-22
Citations: 9 Conn. App. 823
Docket Number: 4424
Parties: Gabriel Gladstone v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act, et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Appellate Reports
Volume: 9
Pages: 823–823

Head Matter:
Gabriel Gladstone v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act, et al.
(4424)
Dupont, C. J., Hull and Spallone, Js.
Argued January 15
decision released January 22, 1987
Max F. Brunswick, for the appellant (plaintiff).
Robert B. Teitelman, assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, were Joseph I. Lieberman, attorney general, and Robert E. Walsh, assistant attorney general, for the appellee (named defendant).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We have thoroughly reviewed the record and briefs filed in this appeal. After affording those claims of error that are properly before us the appropriate scope of review, we conclude that the trial court acted reasonably and in accordance with the law.
There is no error.