Case Name: The JESTERS, a corporation d/b/a Beauclerc Country Club, Appellant, and Norman S. Miller, who joined in the Appeal, Appellants, v. Robert TAYLOR, a Minor, by his father and next friend, Hubert Taylor, and Hubert Taylor, individually, Appellees
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1958-10-01
Citations: 105 So. 2d 569
Docket Number: 
Parties: The JESTERS, a corporation d/b/a Beauclerc Country Club, Appellant, and Norman S. Miller, who joined in the Appeal, Appellants, v. Robert TAYLOR, a Minor, by his father and next friend, Hubert Taylor, and Hubert Taylor, individually, Appellees.
Judges: TERRELL, C. J., and THOMAS, HOB-SON, ROBERTS, DREW and O’CON-NELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 105
Pages: 569–574

Head Matter:
The JESTERS, a corporation d/b/a Beauclerc Country Club, Appellant, and Norman S. Miller, who joined in the Appeal, Appellants, v. Robert TAYLOR, a Minor, by his father and next friend, Hubert Taylor, and Hubert Taylor, individually, Appellees.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Oct. 1, 1958.
Rehearing Denied Oct. 30, 1958.
Francis P. Conroy, Harry T. Gray of Marks, Gray, Yates & Conroy, Jacksonville, for The Jesters, d/b/a Beauclerc Country Club, appellant.
Howell & Kirby, Jacksonville, for Norman S. Miller, appellant.
Cleveland & Goodfriend, W. A. Cleveland, Jr., and Sam Goodfriend, Jacksonville, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
It is the view of Justices Thomas, Hobson, Roberts, Drew, and O'Connell and Chief Justice Terrell that the finding of liability against Norman S. Miller is supported by the evidence and that his appeal is without merit. It is their further holding that the damages are inadequate for the reasons stated in the special opinion of Mr. Justice ROBERTS and that the cause is reversed and remanded for the purpose of a new trial on damages only.
Justices Thomas, Hobson, O'Connell and Chief Justice Terrell hold that the appeal of the Jesters, a corporation d/b/a "Beau-clerc Country Club" is without merit and that the record supports the finding of liability against such corporation; further, that the award is inadequate for the reasons above stated, and the cause is reversed and remanded as to the Jesters, a corporation, etc., for a new trial on the question of damages only.
It is the view of Justices Roberts and Drew that the Jesters, a corporation, is not liable and that the judgment against such corporation should be reversed and the cause dismissed as to it, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice ROBERTS.
The other questions have been considered and found to be without merit.
It is so ordered.
TERRELL, C. J., and THOMAS, HOB-SON, ROBERTS, DREW and O'CON-NELL, JJ., concur.