Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Christopher CORPENING, a/k/a Michael Lewis Corpening, a/k/a Mike Boggie, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-08-26
Citations: 332 F. App'x 107
Docket Number: No. 09-6486
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Christopher CORPENING, a/k/a Michael Lewis Corpening, a/k/a Mike Boggie, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 332
Pages: 107–107

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Christopher CORPENING, a/k/a Michael Lewis Corpening, a/k/a Mike Boggie, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-6486.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 20, 2009.
Decided: Aug. 26, 2009.
Michael Christopher Corpening, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael Christopher Corpening appeals the district court's order partially granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Corpening's motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Corpening, No. 5:03-cr-00037-RLV-DCK-7 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 17, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.