Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Kennita HOWARD, a/k/a Eyez, Defendant - Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-04-23
Citations: 323 F. App'x 281
Docket Number: No. 09-6478
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Kennita HOWARD, a/k/a Eyez, Defendant — Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 323
Pages: 281–282

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Kennita HOWARD, a/k/a Eyez, Defendant — Appellant.
No. 09-6478.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 17, 2009.
Decided: April 23, 2009.
Kennita Howard, Appellant Pro Se. Shawn Angus Morgan, Assistant United States Attorney, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kennita Howard appeals the district court's order denying her motion for sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Howard, No. 1:06-cr-00106-IMK-JSK-l (N.D.W.Va. Mar. 3, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.