Case Name: Sir Peter ERNEST, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-09-12
Citations: 201 S.W.3d 70
Docket Number: No. ED 86809
Parties: Sir Peter ERNEST, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 201
Pages: 70–70

Head Matter:
Sir Peter ERNEST, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 86809.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Sept. 12, 2006.
Michelle M. Rivera, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jayne T. Woods, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Sir Peter Ernest appeals the motion court's denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 24.035. The court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 30.25(b).