Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard V. NGUYEN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-05-13
Citations: 575 F. App'x 724
Docket Number: No. 13-50611
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard V. NGUYEN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 575
Pages: 724–725

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard V. NGUYEN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-50611.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 13, 2014.
Filed May 22, 2014.
Jean-Claude Andre, Assistant U.S., David Michael Herzog, Assistant U.S., Zo-ran Joseph Segina, I, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Richard V. Nguyen, pro se.
Before: CLIFTON, BEA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Richard V. Nguyen appeals from the revocation of supervised release and 12-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Nguyen's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Nguyen the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.