Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Manoj Kumar JHA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-11-22
Citations: 670 F. App'x 815
Docket Number: No. 16-6856
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Manoj Kumar JHA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 670
Pages: 815–815

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Manoj Kumar JHA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-6856
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: November 17, 2016
Decided: November 22, 2016
Manoj Kumar Jha, Appellant Pro Se. Martin Joseph Clarke, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Manoj Kumar Jha appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for a new trial and denying his motion for reconsideration of the order granting the Government an extension of time to file a response. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion by the district court and no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Jha, No. 1:12-cr-00595-ELH-1, 2016 WL 3231038 (D. Md. June 13, 2016). We deny Jha's motion for sanctions and his motion to vacate this court's decision in United States v. Jha, 613 Fed.Appx. 212 (4th Cir. 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED