Case Name: Willie CRENSHAW, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-04-01
Citations: 101 S.W.3d 343
Docket Number: No. ED 81613
Parties: Willie CRENSHAW, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before PAUL J. SIMON, P.J. and GARY M. GAERTNER, SR. and KATHIANNE KRAUP CRANE, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 101
Pages: 343–343

Head Matter:
Willie CRENSHAW, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 81613.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division two.
April 1, 2003.
Gwenda R. Robinson, District Defender, Office B, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Andrea Mazza Follett, Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before PAUL J. SIMON, P.J. and GARY M. GAERTNER, SR. and KATHIANNE KRAUP CRANE, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Willie Crenshaw (movant) appeals the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion reciting detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).