Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark HADDOCK, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-10-23
Citations: 202 F. App'x 969
Docket Number: No. 06-30071
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark HADDOCK, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: LEAVY, W. FLETCHER, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 202
Pages: 969–969

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark HADDOCK, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-30071.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 16, 2006.
Filed Oct. 23, 2006.
Dennis J. Dimsey, Esq., DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division/Appellate Section, Dirk C. Phillips, Dept, of Justice, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Steven V. Richert, Esq., Federal Defenders Eastern Washington and Idaho, Pocatello, ID, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: LEAVY, W. FLETCHER, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Mark Haddock appeals from the 24-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for deprivation of rights under color of law, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 242.
We dismiss in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Jeronimo, 398 F.3d 1149, 1152-53 (9th Cir.2005) (stating that an appeal waiver is valid when it is entered into knowingly and voluntarily).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.