Case Name: Sipal Realty Corporation, Respondent, v. Maurice William, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1959-11-25
Citations: 21 Misc. 2d 287
Docket Number: 
Parties: Sipal Realty Corporation, Respondent, v. Maurice William, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 21
Pages: 287–287

Head Matter:
Sipal Realty Corporation, Respondent, v. Maurice William, Appellant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
November 25, 1959.
William L. Messing for appellant.
Zalkin é Cohen (Frederick B. Sussmann of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The court below based its decision on a finding that rent was due in accordance with a judgment rendered in Special Term, Supreme Court. Thereafter, the Appellate Division reversed the Special Term. (Matter of Sipal Realty Corp. [Dankers], 16 Misc 2d 827, revd. 8 A D 2d 355.) While the preferable practice would have been to move in the Municipal Court for a new trial (Parkhurst v. Berdell, 110 N. Y. 386) we see no reason why the procedure should not be expedited. We, therefore, reverse the final order and direct a final order in favor of the tenant, without costs.
Concur — Steuer, J. P., Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ.
Final order reversed, etc.