Case Name: Jennieva RANDALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-08-01
Citations: 286 F. App'x 500
Docket Number: No. 06-56600
Parties: Jennieva RANDALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; et al., Defendant-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 286
Pages: 500–501

Head Matter:
Jennieva RANDALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; et al., Defendant-Appellees.
No. 06-56600.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 22, 2008.
Filed Aug. 1, 2008.
Jennieva Randall, Inglewood, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Thomas K. Buck, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Civil & Tax Divisions, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: B. FLETCHER, THOMAS, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Jennieva Randall appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for defendants in her Title VII action alleging breach of a settlement agreement. We review de novo, Rene v. MGM Grand Hotel, Inc., 243 F.3d 1206, 1207 (9th Cir. 2001). We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its order of October 5, 2006.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.