Case Name: CLARENCE H. CONOVER, APPELLANT, v. CHARLES E. SCHROEDER, RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1928-05-14
Citations: 104 N.J.L. 658
Docket Number: 
Parties: CLARENCE H. CONOVER, APPELLANT, v. CHARLES E. SCHROEDER, RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 104
Pages: 658–658

Head Matter:
CLARENCE H. CONOVER, APPELLANT, v. CHARLES E. SCHROEDER, RESPONDENT.
Submitted February 17, 1928
Decided May 14, 1928.
For the appellant, Lee F. Washington.
For the respondent, Oole & Cole.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskirk, MoGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.