Case Name: Bennie JORDAN and Sheridan Jordan, Appellants, v. James BOLDEN and Deborah Bolden, Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-07-11
Citations: 21 S.W.3d 880
Docket Number: No. ED 76985
Parties: Bennie JORDAN and Sheridan Jordan, Appellants, v. James BOLDEN and Deborah Bolden, Respondents.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J., PAUL J. SIMON, J., and JAMES R. DOWD, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 21
Pages: 880–881

Head Matter:
Bennie JORDAN and Sheridan Jordan, Appellants, v. James BOLDEN and Deborah Bolden, Respondents.
No. ED 76985.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
July 11, 2000.
R. Kip Welborn, UAW Chrysler Legal Services Plan, St. Louis, for appellant.
Rodolpho Rivera, Christopher M. Braeske, Anderson, Schmidt & Rivera, P.C., Clayton, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J., PAUL J. SIMON, J., and JAMES R. DOWD, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellants, Bennie Jordan and Sheridan Jordan, appeal the judgment of the Circuit Court of Franklin County in favor of respondents, James Bolden and Deborah Bolden. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcript and find the judgment is supported by substantial and competent evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence based on the record as a whole. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).