Case Name: In the Matter of the Application of Edward B. Sudbury, Appellant, to Remove to this Court Two Actions Now Pending in the City Court of the City of New York, Entitled: Wise & Whitlock, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Edward B. Sudbury, Defendant. Edward B. Sudbury, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1916-01
Citations: 172 A.D. 900
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Application of Edward B. Sudbury, Appellant, to Remove to this Court Two Actions Now Pending in the City Court of the City of New York, Entitled: Wise & Whitlock, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Edward B. Sudbury, Defendant. Edward B. Sudbury, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 172
Pages: 900–900

Head Matter:
First Department,
January, 1916.
In the Matter of the Application of Edward B. Sudbury, Appellant, to Remove to this Court Two Actions Now Pending in the City Court of the City of New York, Entitled: Wise & Whitlock, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Edward B. Sudbury, Defendant. Edward B. Sudbury, Respondent.
Appeal from order granting motion to remove to the Supreme Court two actions pending in the City Court.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
The City Court has jurisdiction of the actions brought, and which are now pending therein. Ro actions are now pending in the Supreme Court involving the same causes of action. The only provisions in the Code of Civil Procedure authorizing the removal of actions from the City Court are contained in sections 319.and 319a. Rone of these provisions apply to the case at bar. Under such circumstances there is no authority for the order appealed from, and it must be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Clarke, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Scott and Page, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.