Case Name: Edward Morgan MacKENNA, Appellant, v. O. B. ELLIS, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1961-05-02
Citations: 289 F.2d 928
Docket Number: No. 18110
Parties: Edward Morgan MacKENNA, Appellant, v. O. B. ELLIS, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 289
Pages: 928–930

Head Matter:
Edward Morgan MacKENNA, Appellant, v. O. B. ELLIS, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Appellee.
No. 18110.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
May 2, 1961.
Martin L. C. Feldman, New Orleans, La., Edward Morgan MacKenna, Austin, Tex., for appellant.
John L. Estes, Linward Shivers, Tom I. McFarling, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.
Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and HUTCHESON, RIVES, CAMERON, JONES, BROWN and WISDOM, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
On the Court's own motion, our decision reported as MacKenna v. Ellis, 5 Cir., 1960, 280 F.2d 592, has been considered on rehearing before the Court en banc. The opinion and decision are modified in one respect only.
In lieu of the directions at the conclusion of the opinion as quoted in the margin, the following is substituted:
The judgment is therefore reversed and the cause remanded with directions grant the writ, vacate the judgment of conviction, and make such disposition of the petitioner as law and justice may require at the time of the entry of the final order.
Reversed and remanded with directions.
. "The judgment is therefore reversed and the cause remanded with directions to grant the writ and discharge the petitioner. See 28 U.S.C.A. § 2106.
"Reversed and Remanded with directions." 280 F.2d at pages 604, 605.
. See 28 U.S.C.A. § 2106; United States ex rel. Almeida v. Baldi, 3 Cir., 1952, 195 F.2d 815, 825, 33 A.L.R.2d 1407; Mitchell v. Youell, 4 Cir., 1942, 130 F.2d 880, 882; 15 Am.Jur., Criminal Law, § 364; 25 Am.Jur. Habeas Corpus, § 157; 22 C.J.S. Criminal Law § 266, 267; 39 C.J.S. Habeas Corpus § 102.