Case Name: UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY and Wisconsin Power & Light Company, Petitioners, v. SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD and United States of America, Respondents
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-04-30
Citations: 62 F. App'x 354
Docket Number: Nos. 02-1198, 02-1225
Parties: UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY and Wisconsin Power & Light Company, Petitioners, v. SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD and United States of America, Respondents.
Judges: BEFORE: GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and HENDERSON and GARLAND, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 62
Pages: 354–355

Head Matter:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY and Wisconsin Power & Light Company, Petitioners, v. SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD and United States of America, Respondents.
Nos. 02-1198, 02-1225.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
April 30, 2003.
BEFORE: GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and HENDERSON and GARLAND, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.
This cause came to be heard on the record compiled before the Surface Transportation Board and was briefed and argued by counsel. It is hereby
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petitions be denied for the reasons stated in the Board's decisions. Because the Board did not on review defend its rejection of Wisconsin Power & Light's evidence of roadway ownership variable costs on the ground that Wisconsin Power did not timely file some of that evidence, we rely solely upon the alternate ground in its decision, that "the data needed to correct [Wisconsin Power's] flawed evidence . were not available" and the Board was therefore unable to rely upon that evidence.
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 86, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.