Case Name: MANEKIN CONSTRUCTION LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dana S. LECOMPTE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-12-21
Citations: 706 F. App'x 811
Docket Number: No. 17-1598
Parties: MANEKIN CONSTRUCTION LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dana S. LECOMPTE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Bankruptcy Reporter
Volume: 578
Pages: 811–812

Head Matter:
MANEKIN CONSTRUCTION LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dana S. LECOMPTE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 17-1598
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: December 19, 2017
Decided: December 21, 2017
Jay B. Shuster, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Maria Ellena Chavez-Ruark, SAUL EWING ARNSTEIN & LEHR LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Dana S. LeCompte appeals the district court's order affirming the bankruptcy court's order granting Manekin Construction LLC's motion for sanctions and entering default judgment pursuant to Bankr. R. 7037 (incorporating Fed. R. Civ. P. 37), based on LeCompte's failure to timely respond to discovery requests. We have reviewed the record included on appeal and the parties' briefs, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the bankruptcy court's order for the reasons stated by the district court. Manekin Construction LLC v. LeCompte, No. 1:16-cv-03119-RDB (D. Md. filed Apr. 7, 2017 & entered Apr. 10, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED