Case Name: STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Romez Michael COLEMAN, Jr., Defendant and Appellant
Court: North Dakota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: North Dakota
Decision Date: 2018-02-22
Citations: 906 N.W.2d 911
Docket Number: No. 20170315
Parties: STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Romez Michael COLEMAN, Jr., Defendant and Appellant
Judges: [¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Reporter: North Western Reporter 2d
Volume: 906
Pages: 911–911

Head Matter:
2018 ND 38
STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Romez Michael COLEMAN, Jr., Defendant and Appellant
No. 20170315
Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Filed 2/22/2018
Haley L. Wamstad, Assistant State’s Attorney, Grand Forks, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Russell J. Myhre, Valley City, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief. ''

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Romez Michael Coléman, Jr., appeals from a criminal judgment for aggravated assault—domestic violence. Coleman argues the State presented insufficient evidence to sustain the guilty verdict and the district court erred in allowing testimony about two physical objects that were subject to a stipulation and order restricting their admission into evidence. Sufficient evidence exists to sustain the criminal judgment, and the district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting testimony about the objects. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). and (4).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Jon J. Jensen
Jerod E. Tufte