Case Name: Thomas STOUT, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GARNER POLICE DEPARTMENT; G. E. White, Garner Police Officer; Preston M. Charles, Garner Police Officer, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-12-20
Citations: 671 F. App'x 218
Docket Number: No. 16-7149
Parties: Thomas STOUT, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GARNER POLICE DEPARTMENT; G. E. White, Garner Police Officer; Preston M. Charles, Garner Police Officer, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 671
Pages: 218–219

Head Matter:
Thomas STOUT, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GARNER POLICE DEPARTMENT; G. E. White, Garner Police Officer; Preston M. Charles, Garner Police Officer, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-7149
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: December 15, 2016
Decided: December 20, 2016
Thomas Stout, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Dan McCord Hartzog, Katherine Marie Barber-Jones, Cranfill, Sumner & Hart- zog, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Thomas Stout, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stout v. Garner Police Dep't, No. 5:15-ct-03105-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 12, 2016). We deny Appellees' motion to strike Stout's pro se supplemental brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED