Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Craig Edward JOHNSON, a/k/a Little Dude, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-08-02
Citations: 193 F. App'x 201
Docket Number: No. 06-6498
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Craig Edward JOHNSON, a/k/a Little Dude, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 193
Pages: 201–202

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Craig Edward JOHNSON, a/k/a Little Dude, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 06-6498.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 25, 2006.
Decided: Aug. 2, 2006.
Craig Edward Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. J. Frank Bradsher, Kimberly Ann Moore, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Craig Edward Johnson appeals the district court's order denying his "Place Holder Motion Challenging Subject Matter Jurisdiction Pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 1331." We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Johnson, No. 5:04-cr-00314-F-2 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 22, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.