Case Name: Kenyatta R. HEATH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-01-16
Citations: 804 So. 2d 550
Docket Number: No. 3D01-2564
Parties: Kenyatta R. HEATH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before FLETCHER and SORONDO, JJ., and NESBITT, Senior Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 804
Pages: 550–550

Head Matter:
Kenyatta R. HEATH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D01-2564.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan. 16, 2002.
Kenyatta R. Heath, in proper person.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Jill Traína, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before FLETCHER and SORONDO, JJ., and NESBITT, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Major v. State, 790 So.2d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). As in Major we certify the following question of great public importance:
WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?