Case Name: Maryland v. ElFadl; Van Sant v. United States Postal Service et al.; Myer v. Pacific Federal Savings & Loan Assn.; Rosenbaum v. Rosenbaum; Blanks v. Georgia; Howell v. Maryland; Baig v. United States; Pool v. Armontrout, Warden; Clark v. State Treasurer's Office Employer et al., In re May, Drinkwine v. Federated Publications, Inc., et al.; Collins v. Georgia; Lynch v. Johnson et al.; Gregory v. Solem, Warden; Houghton v. Coder et al.; Choat v. Rome Industries, Inc., et al.; Knies v. Wisconsin; Dyson v. Texas A & M University; Purcell et ux. v. Board of Immigration Appeals
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1986-05-19
Citations: 476 U.S. 1131
Docket Number: No. 85-24; No. 85-1096; No. 85-1272; No. 85-1296; No. 85-5375; No. 85-5729; No. 85-5890; No. 85-5920; No. 85-5978; No. 85-6183; No. 85-6224; No. 85-6229; No. 85-6260; No. 85-6310; No. 85-6311; No. 85-6367; No. 85-6375; No. 85-6403; No. 85-6460
Parties: Maryland v. ElFadl, Van Sant v. United States Postal Service et al., Myer v. Pacific Federal Savings & Loan Assn., Rosenbaum v. Rosenbaum, Blanks v. Georgia, Howell v. Maryland, Baig v. United States, Pool v. Armontrout, Warden, Clark v. State Treasurer’s Office Employer et al., In re May, Drinkwine v. Federated Publications, Inc., et al., Collins v. Georgia, Lynch v. Johnson et al., Gregory v. Solem, Warden, Houghton v. Coder et al., Choat v. Rome Industries, Inc., et al., Knies v. Wisconsin, Dyson v. Texas A & M University, Purcell et ux. v. Board of Immigration Appeals,
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 476
Pages: 1131–1131

Head Matter:
No. 85-24.
No. 85-1096.
No. 85-1272.
No. 85-1296.
No. 85-5375.
No. 85-5729.
No. 85-5890.
No. 85-5920.
No. 85-5978.
No. 85-6183.
No. 85-6224.
No. 85-6229.
No. 85-6260.
No. 85-6310.
No. 85-6311.
No. 85-6367.
No. 85-6375.
No. 85-6403.
No. 85-6460.
Maryland v. ElFadl, Van Sant v. United States Postal Service et al., Myer v. Pacific Federal Savings & Loan Assn., Rosenbaum v. Rosenbaum, Blanks v. Georgia, Howell v. Maryland, Baig v. United States, Pool v. Armontrout, Warden, Clark v. State Treasurer’s Office Employer et al., In re May, Drinkwine v. Federated Publications, Inc., et al., Collins v. Georgia, Lynch v. Johnson et al., Gregory v. Solem, Warden, Houghton v. Coder et al., Choat v. Rome Industries, Inc., et al., Knies v. Wisconsin, Dyson v. Texas A & M University, Purcell et ux. v. Board of Immigration Appeals,

Opinion:
475 U. S. 1081;
475 U. S. 1082;
475 U. S. 1084;
475 U. S. 1078;
475 U. S. 1090;
475 U. S. 1110;
474 U. S. 1103;
475 U. S. 1110;
475 U. S. 1024;
475 U. S. 1044;
475 U. S. 1087;
475 U. S. 1090;
475 U. S. 1087;
475 U. S. 1088;
475 U. S. 1088;
475 U. S. 1097;
475 U. S. 1110;
475 U. S. 1113; and
475 U. S. 1098. Petitions for rehearing denied.