Case Name: CONFEDERATED TRIBES & BANDS OF the YAKAMA INDIAN NATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, and Tulalip Tribe; Swinomish Indian Tribal Community; Suquamish Tribe; Stillaguamish Tribe; Squaxim Island; Skokomish Indian Tribe; Makah Tribe; Muckleshoot Tribe; Nisqually Indian Tribe; Upper Skagit Tribe; Sauk-Suiattle Tribe; Puyallup Tribe; Nooksack Tribe; Hoh Tribe; Jamestown Klallam Indians; Quileute Indian Tribe; Lummi Tribe; Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation; Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation; Nez Perce Tribe of Idaho, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellees, and Alaska Trollers Association, Applicant in intervention-Appellee, v. Malcolm BALDRIGE, Defendant, and Alaska State, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1996-08-16
Citations: 91 F.3d 1366
Docket Number: No. 95-35901
Parties: CONFEDERATED TRIBES & BANDS OF the YAKAMA INDIAN NATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, and Tulalip Tribe; Swinomish Indian Tribal Community; Suquamish Tribe; Stillaguamish Tribe; Squaxim Island; Skokomish Indian Tribe; Makah Tribe; Muckleshoot Tribe; Nisqually Indian Tribe; Upper Skagit Tribe; Sauk-Suiattle Tribe; Puyallup Tribe; Nooksack Tribe; Hoh Tribe; Jamestown Klallam Indians; Quileute Indian Tribe; Lummi Tribe; Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation; Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation; Nez Perce Tribe of Idaho, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellees, and Alaska Trollers Association, Applicant in intervention-Appellee, v. Malcolm BALDRIGE, Defendant, and Alaska State, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant.
Judges: Before: WRIGHT, PREGERSON, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 91
Pages: 1366–1366

Head Matter:
CONFEDERATED TRIBES & BANDS OF the YAKAMA INDIAN NATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, and Tulalip Tribe; Swinomish Indian Tribal Community; Suquamish Tribe; Stillaguamish Tribe; Squaxim Island; Skokomish Indian Tribe; Makah Tribe; Muckleshoot Tribe; Nisqually Indian Tribe; Upper Skagit Tribe; Sauk-Suiattle Tribe; Puyallup Tribe; Nooksack Tribe; Hoh Tribe; Jamestown Klallam Indians; Quileute Indian Tribe; Lummi Tribe; Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation; Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation; Nez Perce Tribe of Idaho, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellees, and Alaska Trollers Association, Applicant in intervention-Appellee, v. Malcolm BALDRIGE, Defendant, and Alaska State, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant.
No. 95-35901.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted April 10, 1996.
Decided Aug. 16, 1996.
Michael AD. Stanley, Bonnie E. Harris, and Myles A. Conway, Assistant Attorneys General, Juneau, Alaska, for defendant-inter-venor-appellant State of Alaska.
Bruce E. Weyhrauch, Faulkner, Banfield, Doogan & Holmes, Juneau, Alaska, for applicant in intervention-appellant and amicus curiae Alaska Trailers Association.
Timothy Weaver, Cockrill & Weaver, Yakima, Washington, for plaintiff-appellee Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation.
Daniel A Raas, Raas, Johnsen, Gerret, Bellingham, Washington, for plaintiffs-appel-lees various Indian Tribes.
Mason D. Morisset, Morisset, Schlosser, Ayer & Jozwick, Seattle, Washington, for plamtiff-intervenor-appellee Tulalip Tribe.
Richard Reich, Tahalah, Washington, for plaintiff-intervenor-appellee Quileute Indian Nation.
Douglas Nash, Lapwar, Idaho, for plaintiff-intervenor-appellee Nez Perce Tribe of Idaho.
Stephanie L. Striffler, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, Oregon, for defendant-appel-lee State of Oregon.
Robert P. Blasco, Robertson, Monagle & Eastaugh, Juneau, Alaska, for amicus curiae Shee-Atika Incorporated, Klukwan, Inc., and Goldbelt, Inc.
Richard A Wegman, Garvey, Schubert & Barer, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae Government of Canada.
David C. Crosby, Wickwire, Greene, Crosby, Brewer & Seward, Juneau, Aaska, for amicus curiae Central Council of the Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes of Alaska.
Before: WRIGHT, PREGERSON, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
For the reasons set forth by the district court in its well-reasoned, well-written order published at 898 F.Supp. 1477 (W.D.Wash.1995), we AFFIRM.