Case Name: In re: Steven Neil KENDALL, Debtor. Aparna Gupta, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven Neil Kendall, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-08-13
Citations: 288 F. App'x 79
Docket Number: No. 07-1563
Parties: In re: Steven Neil KENDALL, Debtor. Aparna Gupta, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Steven Neil Kendall, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Bankruptcy Reporter
Volume: 397
Pages: 79–79

Head Matter:
In re: Steven Neil KENDALL, Debtor. Aparna Gupta, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Steven Neil Kendall, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 07-1563.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 1, 2008.
Decided: Aug. 13, 2008.
A. Hugo Blankingship, III, Blankingship & Associates, P.C., Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Richard G. Hall, Annan-dale, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Steven Kendall appeals from the district court's order affirming the bankruptcy court's order entering judgment in favor of Aparna Gupta on her action challenging the dischargeability, under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A) (2000), of a $65,000 loan made by Gupta to Kendall. We have reviewed the record on appeal and the parties' briefs and conclude that the bankruptcy court did not clearly err in finding that the debt at issue constituted an "extension, renewal, or refinancing of credit," and that it was procured through fraud, within the meaning of § 523(a)(2). See In re Biondo, 180 F.3d 126, 130 (4th Cir.1999). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.