Case Name: Jerry MARTIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Tom CAREY, Warden; Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-02-25
Citations: 89 F. App'x 80
Docket Number: No. 01-57127
Parties: Jerry MARTIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Tom CAREY, Warden; Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: Before: B. FLETCHER, PREGERSON, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 89
Pages: 80–81

Head Matter:
Jerry MARTIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Tom CAREY, Warden; Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 01-57127.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Feb. 12, 2004.
Decided Feb. 25, 2004.
Diane E. Berley, Esq., West Hills, CA, Jerry Martin, Imperial, CA, for petitioner-appellant.
David C. Cook, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for respondents-appellees.
Before: B. FLETCHER, PREGERSON, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Petitioner Jerry Martin seeks a writ of habeas corpus because the trial court refused to appoint an expert on eyewitness testimony. This issue was dealt with di rectly in Jackson v. Ylst, 921 F.2d 882 (9th Cir.1990), in which we held, among other things, that a claim such as Martin's is barred under Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288, 109 S.Ct. 1060, 103 L.Ed.2d 334 (1989). See Jackson, 921 F.2d at 885-86. Martin has failed to demonstrate that Jackson no longer controls. Therefore, the petition is denied.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.