Case Name: Gary BURRELL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. J.E. GUNJA, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-12-05
Citations: 22 F. App'x 225
Docket Number: No. 01-7101
Parties: Gary BURRELL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. J.E. GUNJA, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 22
Pages: 225–225

Head Matter:
Gary BURRELL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. J.E. GUNJA, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 01-7101.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 29, 2001.
Decided Dec. 5, 2001.
Gary Burrell, pro se. Stephen Matthew Schenning, United States Attorney, Ariana Wright Arnold, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, MD, for appellee.
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Gary Burrell appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Burrell v. Gunja, No. CA-00-3686-AMD (D. Md. June 8, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.