Case Name: In the Matter of Charles M. Momah, Appellant, v. Kathleen M. Rogers, as St. Lawrence County Judge, et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1999-03-25
Citations: 93 N.Y.2d 864
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Charles M. Momah, Appellant, v Kathleen M. Rogers, as St. Lawrence County Judge, et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 93
Pages: 864–867

Head Matter:
[711 NE2d 198, 689 NYS2d 13]
In the Matter of Charles M. Momah, Appellant, v Kathleen M. Rogers, as St. Lawrence County Judge, et al., Respondents.
Argued February 9, 1999;
decided March 25, 1999
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Goldman & Hafetz, New York City (Lawrence S. Goldman and Elizabeth M. Johnson of counsel), for appellant.
Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General, Syracuse (Norman S. Hatt, Arthur G. Weinstein and Lawrence N. Gray of counsel), for respondents.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Judgment affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Paul J. Yesawich, Jr., at the Appellate Division (239 AD2d 20).
Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt.