Case Name: In the Matter of the Claim of Fidencio Pelaez, Respondent, v. Alan Silverstone et al., Appellants, and State Insurance Fund et al., Respondents. Workers' Compensation Board, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2012-06-28
Citations: 19 N.Y.3d 954
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Claim of Fidencio Pelaez, Respondent, v Alan Silverstone et al., Appellants, and State Insurance Fund et al., Respondents. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 19
Pages: 954–954

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Claim of Fidencio Pelaez, Respondent, v Alan Silverstone et al., Appellants, and State Insurance Fund et al., Respondents. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.
Submitted May 29, 2012;
decided June 28, 2012

Opinion:
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal purportedly on behalf of Silverbrook Farm, Inc. dismissed upon the ground that Silverbrook Farm, Inc. must appear by an attorney (see CPLR 321 [a]); motion, insofar as Alan Silverstone and Janice Silver-stone seek leave to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order as affirmed the decision of the Workers' Compensation Board denying reconsideration or full Board review, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the Appellate Division order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal by Alan Silverstone and Janice Silverstone otherwise denied.