Case Name: Gary M. GRAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WITTSTADT TITLE AND ESCROW COMPANY LLC; Morris/Hardwick/Schneider; One West Bank, FSB, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-08-20
Citations: 475 F. App'x 461
Docket Number: No. 12-1251
Parties: Gary M. GRAY, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. WITTSTADT TITLE AND ESCROW COMPANY LLC; Morris/Hardwick/Schneider; One West Bank, FSB, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 475
Pages: 461–461

Head Matter:
Gary M. GRAY, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. WITTSTADT TITLE AND ESCROW COMPANY LLC; Morris/Hardwick/Schneider; One West Bank, FSB, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 12-1251.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 16, 2012.
Decided: Aug. 20, 2012.
Gary M. Gray, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Roger Hildebeidel, Morris Hardwick Schneider, PLLC, Dulles, Virginia; Amy Elizabeth Miller, McGuirewoods, LLP, McLean, Virginia; Anand Vijay Ramana, McGuirewoods, LLP, Washington, DC, for Appellees.
Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Gary M. Gray appeals the district court's dismissal of his complaint and its denial of his post-judgment motions to amend the judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) and to amend the complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gray v. Wittstadt Title & Escrow Co., No. 4:11-cv-00111-MSD-TEM (E.D.Va., Nov. 28, 2011, Jan. 25, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.