Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. David Lewis, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1993-11-23
Citations: 82 N.Y.2d 839
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Lewis, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 82
Pages: 839–840

Head Matter:
[626 NE2d 931, 606 NYS2d 146]
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Lewis, Appellant.
Decided November 23, 1993
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Jonathan G. Hager, New York City, and Philip L. Weinstein for appellant.
Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney of Kings County, Brooklyn (Sholom J. Twersky of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Whether the police officers had reasonable suspicion to handle defendant's jacket, which defendant dropped right next to him, involves a mixed question of law and fact (see, People v Hicks, 68 NY2d 234, 238). Where the record supports a determination of such reasonable suspicion, it is beyond the scope of further review by this Court (see, People v Diaz, 81 NY2d 106, 108; People v Cloud, 79 NY2d 786, 786-787; People v Burr, 70 NY2d 354, 360-361, cert denied 485 US 989; People v Hicks, 68 NY2d 234, 238, supra). Evidence in the record supports the Appellate Division's determination that the officer had reasonable suspicion to handle defendant's jacket. The record indicates that, in responding to the radio transmission that someone had been shot in a Brooklyn apartment, the police discovered blood in the hallway near the elevator on the same floor on which the apartment was located, and heard arguing and loud music coming from the apartment. Defendant, who was in the apartment, appeared startled when he saw the officers and immediately dropped his jacket to the floor. When the jacket hit the bare floor, the officer heard a metallic "thunk," picked up the jacket, and recovered a gun.
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Hancock, Jr., Bellacosa, Smith and Levine concur.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed in a memorandum.