Case Name: HILL v. MICHOM
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1927-01-14
Citations: 5 Ohio Law Abs. 76
Docket Number: No. 20272
Parties: HILL v. MICHOM
Judges: 
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 5
Pages: 76–76

Head Matter:
HILL v. MICHOM
No. 20272.
Supreme Court
Dock. Jan. 14, 1927,
5 Abs. 43.
Attorneys — M. I. Rettig for Hill; E. H. Ray for Michom; both of Toledo.

Opinion:
Hill contends that a judgment of seventy-five dollars against him is erroneous and same should be quashed, because damages cannot be collected for wantonly killing a dog not listed for taxation.