Case Name: Briheim Lafee RICE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. BLANKS, Sergeant/Security; B. Hines-Collins, Sergeant/Security, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-12-06
Citations: 157 F. App'x 596
Docket Number: No. 05-7144
Parties: Briheim Lafee RICE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. J. BLANKS, Sergeant/Security; B. Hines-Collins, Sergeant/Security, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 157
Pages: 596–596

Head Matter:
Briheim Lafee RICE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. J. BLANKS, Sergeant/Security; B. Hines-Collins, Sergeant/Security, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 05-7144.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 22, 2005.
Decided Dec. 6, 2005.
Briheim Lafee Rice, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Briheim Lafee Rice appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint, denying his petition for preliminary injunction, and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Rice v. Blanks, No. CA-05-599 (E.D. Va. June 21, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED