Case Name: Keith PARKER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-04-27
Citations: 133 S.W.3d 540
Docket Number: No. ED 83256
Parties: Keith PARKER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 133
Pages: 540–541

Head Matter:
Keith PARKER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent.
No. ED 83256.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
April 27, 2004.
Irene Earns, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Lisa M. Eaton, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Keith Parker, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing.
A jury convicted movant of robbery in the first degree, burglary in the first degree and two counts of armed criminal action. Movant appealed from the judgment of conviction and sentence and this court affirmed. State v. Parker, 81 S.W.3d 147 (Mo.App.E.D.2002). Movant filed a pro se and amended Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. After an evidentia-ry hearing, the motion court denied mov-ant's motion and he appeals. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).