Case Name: Jose Perez VASQUEZ, Petitioner, v. DI LIDO HOTEL, Vichi, Inc. and F. I. C., an Administrative Agency, Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1965-12-08
Citations: 180 So. 2d 651
Docket Number: No. 34629
Parties: Jose Perez VASQUEZ, Petitioner, v. DI LIDO HOTEL, Vichi, Inc. and F. I. C., an Administrative Agency, Respondents.
Judges: THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 180
Pages: 651–651

Head Matter:
Jose Perez VASQUEZ, Petitioner, v. DI LIDO HOTEL, Vichi, Inc. and F. I. C., an Administrative Agency, Respondents.
No. 34629.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Dec. 8, 1965.
David Goldman and Frank F. Cosgrove, Miami, for petitioner.
Carey, Terry, Dwyer, Austin, Cole & Stephens, Miami, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J., Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date June 29, 1965.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.
Petitioner's application for attorney's fees is denied.
THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, O'CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.