Case Name: F. W. MATTHIESSEN et al., Appellants, v. MONTECITO COUNTY WATER DISTRICT (a County Water District), Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1933-04-03
Citations: 217 Cal. 788
Docket Number: L. A. No. 12832
Parties: F. W. MATTHIESSEN et al., Appellants, v. MONTECITO COUNTY WATER DISTRICT (a County Water District), Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Reports
Volume: 217
Pages: 788–789

Head Matter:
[L. A. No. 12832.
In Bank.
April 3, 1933.]
F. W. MATTHIESSEN et al., Appellants, v. MONTECITO COUNTY WATER DISTRICT (a County Water District), Respondent.
James F. Peck, Charles F. Blackstock and Elizabeth M. Maxwell for Appellants.
William P. Hubbard, as Amicus Curiae on Behalf of Appellants.
J. F. Goux, City Attorney, Heaney, Price & Postel and W. G. Irving for Respondent.

Opinion:
THE COURT.
The appeal in this case involves the same questions presented in the case of Gin S. Chow v. City of Santa Barbara, (L. A. No. 12834) ante, p. 673 [22 Pac. (2d) 5], this day decided, and by stipulation was submitted on the same briefs filed in that case. On the authority of that case the judgment herein is affirmed.
Preston, J., dissented.
Rehearing denied.
Preston, J., dissented.