Case Name: Cary BRANTLEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1997-04-16
Citations: 708 So. 2d 598
Docket Number: No. 97-858
Parties: Cary BRANTLEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and COPE, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 708
Pages: 598–598

Head Matter:
Cary BRANTLEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 97-858.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 16, 1997.
Rehearing Granted May 12, 1997.
Cary Brantley, in pro. per.
Robert A Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and COPE, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Because the asserted errors in the appellant's guidelines scoresheet and sentence are not readily ascertainable from the face of the record and are therefore not cognizable in this Rule 3.800(a) proceeding, State v. Montague, 682 So.2d 1085 (Fla.1996); McCalister v. State, 682 So.2d 556 (Fla.1996), approving McCalister v. State, 664 So.2d 1149 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); State v. Callaway, 658 So.2d 983 (Fla.1995); Holland v. State, 672 So.2d 566 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996), review denied, 678 So.2d 338 (Fla.1996), the order below denying relief is
Affirmed.
. Any motion asserted under Rule 3.850 is barred as untimely.