Case Name: State, ex rel. Lytle, v. Hottle
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1989-02-08
Citations: 41 Ohio St. 3d 713
Docket Number: 89-182
Parties: State, ex rel. Lytle, v. Hottle.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Holmes, Douglas, Wright and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 41
Pages: 713–713

Head Matter:
Wednesday, February 8, 1989
MERIT DOCKET
89-182.
State, ex rel. Lytle, v. Hottle.

Opinion:
In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED by the court that said writ be, and the same is hereby, denied, effective February 7, 1989.
Moyer, C.J., Holmes, Douglas, Wright and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Sweeney and H. Brown, JJ., dissent.