Case Name: Hartman Realty Co., Inc., Respondent, v. Local 150 United Mechanics I. F. L. W. C. I. O., Appellant, et al., Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1943-05-11
Citations: 180 Misc. 524
Docket Number: 
Parties: Hartman Realty Co., Inc., Respondent, v. Local 150 United Mechanics I. F. L. W. C. I. O., Appellant, et al., Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 180
Pages: 524–525

Head Matter:
Hartman Realty Co., Inc., Respondent, v. Local 150 United Mechanics I. F. L. W. C. I. O., Appellant, et al., Defendants.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
May 11, 1943.
Alexander Bloch for appellant.
Samuel Berger for respondent.

Opinion:
Memorandum Per Curiam.
Service upon the manager of the tenant was no compliance with sectionT3 of the General Associations Law. The court therefore acquired no jurisdiction over the tenant. An objection to the court's jurisdiction may be taken by answer (Lloyd v. Sloan, 259 App. Div. 615).
Final order and judgment reversed, with twenty dollars costs, and final order directed in favor of tenant, dismissing the proceeding with costs, without prejudice to a new proceeding.
Hammer, Shten-tag and Hecht, JJ., concur.