Case Name: RICHARD WEEKS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THE CITY OF NEWARK, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1961-02-20
Citations: 34 N.J. 250
Docket Number: 
Parties: RICHARD WEEKS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THE CITY OF NEWARK, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 34
Pages: 250–250

Head Matter:
RICHARD WEEKS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THE CITY OF NEWARK, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Argued January 10, 1961
Decided February 20, 1961.
Mr. Thomas M. Kane argued the cause for the appellant (Mr. Vincent P. Torppey, attorney; Mr. Jacob M. Goldberg, of counsel).
Mr. Milton Yormarlc argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Zarin and Yormarlc, attorneys).

Opinion:
Pee Cueiam.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Goldmann in the court below.
For affirmance—Chief Justice Weinteaub, and Justices Jacobs, Eeancis, Peoctoe, Hall and Schettino—6.
For reversal—Hone.