Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Karl A. RICHARD, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2007-07-17
Citations: 234 S.W.3d 501
Docket Number: No. ED 87860
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Karl A. RICHARD, Appellant.
Judges: Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 234
Pages: 501–501

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Karl A. RICHARD, Appellant.
No. ED 87860.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
July 17, 2007.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 29, 2007.
Application for Transfer Denied Oct. 30, 2007.
Timothy Forneris, Office of the Missouri Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Victor J. Melenbrink, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, Mo, for respondent.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Karl A. Richard appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of first degree robbery in violation of section 569.020 RSMo 2000, attempted first degree robbery in violation of section 564.011, and two counts of armed criminal action in violation of section 571.015. We find that the trial court did not err in limiting Richard's counsel's questions on voir dire. We also find that the trial court did not err in allowing the prosecutor to make certain comments during its closing argument.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 80.25(b).
. All statutory references are to RSMo 2000.