Case Name: Oliver LEE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1973-02-21
Citations: 273 So. 2d 403
Docket Number: No. 72-722
Parties: Oliver LEE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 273
Pages: 403–403

Head Matter:
Oliver LEE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 72-722.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 21, 1973.
Oliver Lee, in pro. per.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.
Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Oliver Lee, pro se, appeals from a conviction based on a jury verdict on the charge of robbery.
Appellant contends that the court erred in denying his motion for a new trial.
We have considered appellant's contentions in light of the record on appeal and the briefs and have concluded that no reversible error has been made to appear. See: Luster v. State, Fla.App.1972, 262 So.2d 910; Cf., State v. Sears, 148 Fla. 89, 3 So.2d 721. We have reached our decision without considering the merits of an affidavit of another prisoner, George Hagin, which purports to absolve appellant of complicity in the commission of the crime for which he was convicted. That information was not considered since it is not properly before us in this appeal. This is not to say that it cannot be brought to the attention of the trial court in an appropriate proceeding.
Therefore, for the reasons stated the judgment appealed from is hereby affirmed.
Affirmed.