Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Charley Steele SIMPSON, Jr., Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1970-05-11
Citations: 426 F.2d 286
Docket Number: No. 14051
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Charley Steele SIMPSON, Jr., Appellant.
Judges: Before BOREMAN, WINTER and CRAVEN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 426
Pages: 286–287

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Charley Steele SIMPSON, Jr., Appellant.
No. 14051.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Argued May 4, 1970.
Decided May 11, 1970.
Robert A. Pustilnik, Richmond, Va. (Court-appointed counsel) [Ralph K. Helge, Pasadena, Cal. (Court-appointed counsel) on the brief], for appellant.
Bruce B. Briggs, Asst. U. S. Atty. (Keith S. Snyder, U. S. Atty., and David B. Sentelle, Asst. U. S. Atty., on the brief), for appellee.
Before BOREMAN, WINTER and CRAVEN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
When defendant registered with his local board he claimed to be a conscientious objector opposed to participation in war in any form and opposed to noncombatant training and service in the Armed Forces. The board first gave him a student deferment; and when he ceased to be a student, the board classified him I-A-O. Defendant appealed his I-A-0 classification, urging that he should have been classified I-O. His claim was rejected and he was ordered to report for induction and assignment to noncombatant duty. Neither in notices to him nor in the board's minutes was any reason stated why defendant's claim to be classified 1-0 was denied.
Defendant's selective service file established a prima facie case of entitlement to a 1-0 classification. It follows that the failure to assign any reason for its rejection renders invalid the conviction for failure to report for induction based upon the invalid classification. United States v. Broyles, 423 F.2d 1299 (4 Cir. 1970); United States v. James, 417 F.2d 826 (4 Cir. 1969). Defendant was entitled to acquittal.
Reversed.