Case Name: LOOMIS et al., Respondents, v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1912-11-20
Citations: 138 N.Y.S. 1126
Docket Number: 
Parties: LOOMIS et al., Respondents, v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 138
Pages: 1126–1126

Head Matter:
LOOMIS et al., Respondents, v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO., Appellant.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
November 20, 1912.)
Action by Leslie G. Loomis and another against the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Judgment and order reversed, and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that the words "Grand Street" in the bill of lading indicate-the address of the consignee, and the fact that there is a Grand Street- freight yard does 'not create an ambiguity sufficient to justify submitting to the jury the question of whether the words "Grand Street" were used to designate-such freight yard as a place of delivery.
KRUSE and ROBSON, JJ., dissent.