Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joseph Walker, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1989-06-02
Citations: 151 A.D.2d 980
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph Walker, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 151
Pages: 980–980

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph Walker, Appellant.

Opinion:
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The trial court did not err in refusing to charge reckless assault in the third degree (Penal Law § 120.00 [2]) as a lesser included offense of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05 [2]). A person acts "recklessly" when he consciously disregards a substantial and unjustifiable risk and his conduct constitutes a gross deviation from the behavior expected of a reasonable person (Penal Law § 15.05 [3]). Defendant testified that the complainant stabbed him in the arm with a knife; that in an attempt to protect himself from serious injury or death, he struggled with her for possession of the knife; and that in the course of the struggle, she suffered the cuts to her arm and a wound in the chest. This evidence, viewed favorably to defendant (see, People v Henderson, 41 NY2d 233, 236), supported his claim of justifiable conduct, but negated any claim of reckless conduct as much as it negated a claim of intentional conduct (see, People v Zayas, 140 AD2d 395, lv denied 72 NY2d 869).
Defendant's claim that the court erred in admitting a police officer's testimony concerning defendant's request for counsel in the course of custodial interrogation was not preserved for our review (see, People v Frankos, 110 AD2d 713). Also, defense counsel's objection to expert testimony on relevancy grounds was inadequate to preserve the claim raised on appeal that the testimony was speculative (see, People v Osuna, 103 AD2d 719, affd 65 NY2d 822). We decline to exercise our discretion to review either issue in the interest of justice (CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). Defendant's remaining claim of error lacks merit. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Egan, J. — assault, second degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Denman, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.