Case Name: Frank SPRADLING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-02-01
Citations: 573 So. 2d 446
Docket Number: No. 90-01102
Parties: Frank SPRADLING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and LEHAN and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 573
Pages: 446–446

Head Matter:
Frank SPRADLING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 90-01102.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Feb. 1, 1991.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Robert D. Rosen, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
Robert A.' Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Erica M. Raffel, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the judgment and sentence in this case. However, we strike the provision in the judgment which assesses a public defender fee against appellant, because the record indicates these costs were imposed without prior notice or the opportunity to be heard. Our decision is without prejudice to the state to seek reimposition of the fee after adequate notice to appellant.
CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and LEHAN and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.