Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mario Rene CASTILLO-RECINOS, also known as Fernando Rene Garcia, also known as Carmalino Perez, also known as Mario Rene Castillo Reci-nos, also known as Fernando Renee Perez, also known as Francisco Flores, also known as Fernando Rene Perez, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-10-22
Citations: 349 F. App'x 980
Docket Number: No. 08-20572
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mario Rene CASTILLO-RECINOS, also known as Fernando Rene Garcia, also known as Carmalino Perez, also known as Mario Rene Castillo Reci- nos, also known as Fernando Renee Perez, also known as Francisco Flores, also known as Fernando Rene Perez, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before GARZA, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 349
Pages: 980–981

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mario Rene CASTILLO-RECINOS, also known as Fernando Rene Garcia, also known as Carmalino Perez, also known as Mario Rene Castillo Reci- nos, also known as Fernando Renee Perez, also known as Francisco Flores, also known as Fernando Rene Perez, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-20572
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Oct. 22, 2009.
James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before GARZA, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Mario Rene Castillo-Recinos (Castillo) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Castillo has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel's brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5tii Cir. R. 47.5.4.