Case Name: The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Westfall, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1976-04-21
Citations: 46 Ohio St. 2d 31
Docket Number: No. 75-773
Parties: The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Westfall, Appellant.
Judges: O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, Celebrezze, W. Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Second Series
Volume: 46
Pages: 31–32

Head Matter:
The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Westfall, Appellant.
[Cite as State v. Westfall (1976), 46 Ohio St. 2d 31.]
(No. 75-773
—Decided April 21,1976.)
Mr. Douglas MacGUlivray, prosecuting attorney, for appellee.
Messrs. Bowers, White é DeMeo and Mr. David E. Bowers, for appellant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This court finds the case of State v. Williamson (1967), 10 Ohio St. 2d 195, controlling.
In Williamson, at page 196, this court held:
"In our opinion, a defendant incarcerated in prison and acting without the aid of counsel filed his notice of appeal in time, if, within the period specified he delivers such notice to the proper prison authorities for forwarding to the court. In such a case, the jailer in effect represents the lower court . We believe that such a conclusion is required by Fallen v. United States (1964), 378 U. S. 139."
In the case at bar, appellant filed his original notice of appeal with the Legal Officer of the Chillicothe Correctional Institute on July 18, 1975, well within the time for perfecting his appeal. Through no fáult of appellant, the notice of appeal was erroneously mailed to Lucas County. Therefore, appellant, who properly followed institution procedure, has filed his notice of appeal "in time" by delivering such notice "to the proper prison authorities for forwarding to the court." Williamson, supra.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to the Court of Appeals for a hearing on the merits.
Judgment reversed.
O'Neill, C. J., Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, Celebrezze, W. Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.