Case Name: PETER GREINER, PROSECUTOR, v. THE TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRIDGE, IN THE COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX, ET AL., DEFENDANTS
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1925-01-29
Citations: 3 N.J. Misc. 118
Docket Number: 
Parties: PETER GREINER, PROSECUTOR, v. THE TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRIDGE, IN THE COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 3
Pages: 118–118

Head Matter:
PETER GREINER, PROSECUTOR, v. THE TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRIDGE, IN THE COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
Argued on brief submitted December 2, 1924
Decided January 29, 1925.
Before Justices Kalis oh, Black and Campbell.
.For the application, Bernard W. Vogel and Ephraim Cutter.
For the defendants, J. II. Thayer Martin.

Opinion:
Pee Cukiam.
The affidavits presented on behalf of the prosecutor disclose facts which are disputed by defendants, and which facts involve the determination of the the question whether there was a dedication, as claimed by the prosecutor, for jiark purposes, and an acceptance by the township. Testimony must be taken in regard thereto. The writ is allowed with leave to take depositions.