Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Manuel FERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-08-22
Citations: 668 F. App'x 288
Docket Number: No. 15-35116
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Manuel FERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 668
Pages: 288–289

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Manuel FERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-35116
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted August 16, 2016
FILED August 22, 2016
Caitlin Ann Baunsgard, Attorney, DOJ-United States Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Washington, Katherine Jill Bolton, Assistant U.S. Attorney, USSP-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Spokane, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Juan Manuel Fernandez, Pro Se.
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Juan Manuel Fernandez appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Fernandez's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Fernandez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief.
Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.