Case Name: James Tracey LEE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Willie EAGLETON, Warden of Evans Correctional Institution, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-09-09
Citations: 291 F. App'x 499
Docket Number: No. 08-7034
Parties: James Tracey LEE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Willie EAGLETON, Warden of Evans Correctional Institution, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 291
Pages: 499–500

Head Matter:
James Tracey LEE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Willie EAGLETON, Warden of Evans Correctional Institution, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 08-7034.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 18, 2008.
Decided: Sept. 9, 2008.
James Tracey Lee, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, James Anthony Mabry, South Carolina Attorney General’s Office, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
James Tracey Lee seeks to appeal the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appeal-able unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certifícate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2258(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable. or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Lee has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.