Case Name: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. A.R., Petitioner
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2012-07-26
Citations: 50 A.3d 122
Docket Number: No. 269 MAL 2010
Parties: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. A.R., Petitioner.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 50
Pages: 122–122

Head Matter:
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. A.R., Petitioner.
No. 269 MAL 2010.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
July 26, 2012.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 26th day of July, 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:
Did the Superior Court err in affirming the admission of the results of the therapeutic polygraph at the violation of probation hearing? Were the enumerated conditions of admissibility appropriate?