Case Name: CURRIER v. ROSEFF
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1899-12-28
Citations: 61 N.Y.S. 838
Docket Number: 
Parties: CURRIER v. ROSEFF.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 61
Pages: 838–838

Head Matter:
CURRIER v. ROSEFF.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
December 28, 1899.)
Appeal and Error—Record—Sufficiency—Jurisdiction.
A judgment of the municipal court in favor of plaintiff will be reversed' when the record does not show that defendant resides within the territorial jurisdiction of the triál court, and the defendant attacks the judgment on that ground.
Appeal from municipal court, borough of Manhattan, First district.
Action by Alfred H. Currier against Samuel Roseff. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed.
Argued before FREEDMAN, P. J., and MacLEAN and LEVENTRITT, JJ.
Charles Cohn, for appellant.
John Callahan, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
It nowhere appearing in the record that the defendant is a resident within the jurisdiction of the trial court, and the judgment having been attacked upon that ground, it must - be reversed.
Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.