Case Name: In the Matter of 36th and Second Tenants Association, Petitioner, v. New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, Respondent, and S&M Enterprises, Intervenor-Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1998-04-16
Citations: 249 A.D.2d 101
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of 36th and Second Tenants Association, Petitioner, v New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, Respondent, and S&M Enterprises, Intervenor-Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 249
Pages: 101–102

Head Matter:
In the Matter of 36th and Second Tenants Association, Petitioner, v New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, Respondent, and S&M Enterprises, Intervenor-Respondent.
[670 NYS2d 106]

Opinion:
—Determination of respondent New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal dated October 9, 1996, terminating the finding of harassment issued October 30, 1985 against intervenorrespondent landlord and restoring its rights under the rent laws and regulations, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Richard Lowe, III, J.], entered on or about October 14, 1997), dismissed, without costs.
Deferring to the Administrative Law Judge's credibility determinations and resolution of conflicting testimony (see, Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436, 443-444), the record contains substantial evidence that conditions of harassment no longer exist in the premises, despite some sporadic instances of the furnishing of below-standard services.
We have considered petitioner's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Rubin, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.