Case Name: Melissa L. LOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Barbara M. MUEHLENKAMP, Defendant-Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-11-28
Citations: 34 S.W.3d 218
Docket Number: No. ED 77531
Parties: Melissa L. LOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Barbara M. MUEHLENKAMP, Defendant-Respondent.
Judges: Before MOONEY, P.J., SULLIVAN, J., and PUDLOWSKI, Sr. J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 34
Pages: 218–219

Head Matter:
Melissa L. LOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Barbara M. MUEHLENKAMP, Defendant-Respondent.
No. ED 77531.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Nov. 28, 2000.
James S. Collins, II, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Richard C. Wuestling, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before MOONEY, P.J., SULLIVAN, J., and PUDLOWSKI, Sr. J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Melissa Lott appeals from the trial court's judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict in an action arising out of an automobile collision. We find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memo randum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).