Case Name: Maxine Goldfarb, Appellant, v. George A. Hudson, Jr., et al., Defendants, and Rego Maintenance Corp., Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1981-03-26
Citations: 53 N.Y.2d 654
Docket Number: 
Parties: Maxine Goldfarb, Appellant, v George A. Hudson, Jr., et al., Defendants, and Rego Maintenance Corp., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 53
Pages: 654–656

Head Matter:
Maxine Goldfarb, Appellant, v George A. Hudson, Jr., et al., Defendants, and Rego Maintenance Corp., Respondent.
Argued February 17, 1981;
decided March 26, 1981
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Edgar T. Schleider for appellant.
William Dinkes and Victor Roger Rubin for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (75 AD2d 775). Appellant tendered no evidentiary proof in admissible form showing facts sufficient to require a trial.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.