Case Name: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. B & M EXCAVATING, INC., Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1966-11-08
Citations: 368 F.2d 624
Docket Number: No. 20936
Parties: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. B & M EXCAVATING, INC., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 368
Pages: 624–625

Head Matter:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. B & M EXCAVATING, INC., Respondent.
No. 20936.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
Nov. 8, 1966.
Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Gregory L. Hell-bung, Attys., N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
Patrick B. Phelan, Long Beach, Cal., for respondent.
Before HAMLEY and ELY, Circuit Judges, and SOLOMON, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The National Labor Relations Board (Board) did not err in finding and concluding that B & M Excavating, Inc., is subject to the Board's jurisdiction, and that the company had violated section 8(a) (1) of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat. 452 (1935), as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 158.
The Board's cease and desist order of November 23,1965, based upon such findings and conclusions, will therefore be enforced.