Case Name: Donald HODGSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SHENANDOAH'S PRIDE DAIRY, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-07-31
Citations: 42 F. App'x 594
Docket Number: No. 02-1583
Parties: Donald HODGSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SHENANDOAH’S PRIDE DAIRY, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 42
Pages: 594–594

Head Matter:
Donald HODGSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SHENANDOAH’S PRIDE DAIRY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 02-1583.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 25, 2002.
Decided July 31, 2002.
Donald Hodgson, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffery M. Ricapito, Krupin, Greenbaum & O’Brien, Washington, D.C.; Bonnie Lineweaver Paul, Harrisonburg, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Donald Hodgson appeals the district court's order denying relief on his action alleging a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C.A. § 12101-12213 (West 1995 & Supp.2001), by his employer. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hodgson v. Shenandoah's Pride, No. CA-01-29-5 (W.D.Va. Apr. 26, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.