Case Name: LONGO v. UNITED STATES
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1933-04-29
Citations: 64 F.2d 536
Docket Number: No. 6593
Parties: LONGO v. UNITED STATES.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 64
Pages: 536–537

Head Matter:
LONGO v. UNITED STATES.
No. 6593.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 29, 1933.
Robert B. Todd, of New Orleans, La., for appellant.
Edmond E. Talbot, U. S. Atty., and P. M. Flanagan, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of New Orleans, La.
Before BRYAN, SIBLEY and HUTCH-ESON, Circuit Judges.
Rehearing denied June 9, 1933.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant was convicted of the unlawful sale of cocaine in violation of 26 USCA § 692. The only assignment of error is that the charge of the court was one-sided in that it emphasized the evidence in behalf of the government and did not fully present the testimony in behalf of the accused which tended to show that the sale alleged had not been made.
There was more evidence for the government than there was for appellant; but the District Judge fairly and impartially presented the substance of the evidence on both sides. The charge taken as a whole, as it must be, is not subject to the criticism that the trial judge was stating as a fact that the sale of cocaine had been made. lie only said that was the contention of the government, and immediately followed that statement with one that it was denied on behalf of appellant that the sale had been made.
The judgment is affirmed.