Case Name: Kellong Holding Corp., Appellant, v. John Wilson, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1959-11-25
Citations: 21 Misc. 2d 287
Docket Number: 
Parties: Kellong Holding Corp., Appellant, v. John Wilson, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 21
Pages: 287–288

Head Matter:
Kellong Holding Corp., Appellant, v. John Wilson, Respondent.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
November 25, 1959.
Samuel Pecker for appellant.
No one appearing for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Neither the retention of money orders reflecting current rent, nor acceptance of reduced rental pursuant to an order of the Bent Commission, later revoked, constitutes basis for either waiver or estoppel. While the order of the Bent Commission was in effect, the landlord was forbidden to accept more than the rent fixed therein. Moreover, the Civil Practice Act permits the maintenance of summary proceedings upon default in payment of rent where the occupancy is "with or without the permission of the landlord '\ (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1410, subd. 2; Wasservogel v. Meyerowitz, 300 N. Y. 125; 504 West 145th St. Corp. v. Story, 146 N. Y. S. 2d 491.)
The final order should be reversed, with $30 costs, and final order directed for landlord as prayed for in the petition, with costs.
Concur — Hofstadter, J. P., Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ-
Final order reversed, etc.