Case Name: Carol Lee SHULMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-07-30
Citations: 43 F. App'x 128
Docket Number: No. 01-55070; D.C. No. CV-00-12455-IFP
Parties: Carol Lee SHULMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 43
Pages: 128–128

Head Matter:
Carol Lee SHULMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 01-55070.
D.C. No. CV-00-12455-IFP.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 22, 2002 .
Decided July 30, 2002.
Before BROWNING, KOZINSKI, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Carol Lee Shulman appeals pro se the district court's denial of her application to proceed in forma pauperis. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Shulman paid the filing fees in the district court after appealing the order denying her application to proceed in forma pauperis; therefore, her appeal is moot. See Lipscomb v. Madigan, 221 F.2d 798, 798 (9th Cir.1955).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.