Case Name: James BULLER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jo Ann GORDON, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-04-04
Citations: 125 F. App'x 156
Docket Number: No. 04-56240
Parties: James BULLER, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Jo Ann GORDON, Respondent—Appellee.
Judges: Before: B. FLETCHER, TROTT, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 125
Pages: 156–156

Head Matter:
James BULLER, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Jo Ann GORDON, Respondent—Appellee.
No. 04-56240.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 23, 2005.
Decided April 4, 2005.
James Buller, Norco, CA, pro se.
Robert M. Foster, Esq., Attorney General CAS, AGCA—Office of the California Attorney General, San Diego, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.
Before: B. FLETCHER, TROTT, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
California state prisoner James Buller appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition challenging his conviction for petty theft and receiving stolen property. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.
Buller contends that his trial counsel rendered constitutionally ineffective assistance by failing to object to the admissibility of ARCO gasoline billing records. We disagree. The California Court of Appeal's rejection of this claim for lack of deficient performance was not an unreasonable application of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 688, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), especially in light of Buller's reliance on the same billing statements as part of his defense.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.