Case Name: Thomas B. KEE, Appellant, v. F. Lee BAILEY, et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1994-01-25
Citations: 634 So. 2d 654
Docket Number: No. 92-2198
Parties: Thomas B. KEE, Appellant, v. F. Lee BAILEY, et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before NESBITT, COPE and LEVY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 634
Pages: 654–655

Head Matter:
Thomas B. KEE, Appellant, v. F. Lee BAILEY, et al., Appellees.
No. 92-2198.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan. 25, 1994.
Rehearing Denied May 10, 1994.
Thomas B. Kee, in pro. per.
Kubicki, Draper & Gallagher, and David B. Pakula, Miami, for appellee Bailey, Gersten, P.A.
Carusello & Hunnefeld, P.A., and Henry J. Hunnefeld, Coral Gables, for appellees Kenneth J. Carusello, Henry J. Hunnefeld, and Carusello & Hunnefeld, P.A.
Robert D. Hertzberg, P.A., and Robert D. Hertzberg, Miami, for appellees Robert D. Hertzberg, Norman Malinski, and Hertzberg & Malinski, P.A.
Greenberg, Traurig, Hoffman, Lipoff, Ro-sen & Quentel, and Barry Richard, Tallahassee, for appellees The Florida Bar and Warren J. Stamm.
Before NESBITT, COPE and LEVY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Thomas Kee appeals a final order dismissing his second amended complaint with prejudice. We affirm. Rogers v. State, 630 So.2d 513 (Fla.1993); DeWitt v. Rossi 559 So.2d 659 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).
The Florida Supreme Court has clearly stated that a party abandons previously filed post-judgment motions when he files a notice of appeal of that judgment. In re Forfeiture of $101,591 in U.S. Currency, 589 So.2d 283, 285 (Fla.1991); First Union Nat'l Bank of Florida v. Yost, 622 So.2d 111, 113 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).
The Florida Bar and its employees act as an official arm of the Florida Supreme Court and in such capacity enjoy absolute immunity for actions taken within the scope of their duties. Mueller v. The Florida Bar, 390 So.2d 449 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).
Affirmed.