Case Name: Christopher Earl PEEK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUNTRUST BANK MORTGAGE, INC., In subsidiaries, affiliates, and Assigns, BWW Law Group, LLC, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-07-24
Citations: 693 F. App'x 231
Docket Number: No. 17-1330
Parties: Christopher Earl PEEK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUNTRUST BANK MORTGAGE, INC., In subsidiaries, affiliates, and Assigns, BWW Law Group, LLC, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 693
Pages: 231–232

Head Matter:
Christopher Earl PEEK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUNTRUST BANK MORTGAGE, INC., In subsidiaries, affiliates, and Assigns, BWW Law Group, LLC, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 17-1330
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 20, 2017
Decided: July 24, 2017
Christopher Earl Peek, Appellant Pro Se. Maurice Francis Mullins, Jr., Elizabeth Scott Turner, SPOTTS FAIN, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Earl Peek appeals the district court's order granting defendant's motion to dismiss and denying as moot Peek's motion to consolidate or remove the foreclosure action from D.C. superior court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Peek v. SunTrust Bank Mortg., Inc., No. 1:16-cv-01415-LMB-IDD (E.D. Va. Feb. 15, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED