Case Name: William Watt SUMMERS, Appellant, v. Nathan A. McCOY, United States Postmaster at Columbus, Ohio, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1947-10-21
Citations: 163 F.2d 1021
Docket Number: No. 10477
Parties: William Watt SUMMERS, Appellant, v. Nathan A. McCOY, United States Postmaster at Columbus, Ohio, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 163
Pages: 1021–1021

Head Matter:
William Watt SUMMERS, Appellant, v. Nathan A. McCOY, United States Postmaster at Columbus, Ohio, Appellee.
No. 10477.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Oct. 21, 1947.
James N. Linton and Henry J. Linton, both of Columbus, Ohio, for appellant.
Ray J. O’Donnell, of Cincinnati, Ohio, and Loren G. Windom, of Columbus, Ohio, for appellee.
Before HICKS, McALLISTER, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This appeal having been considered by the Court on the record, arguments of counsel and respective briefs; and it appearing that the order of the Postmaster General, of which the appellant complains, was fairly arrived at, has substantial evidence to support it and is not palpably wrong or arbitrary; it is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and is affirmed. Leach v. Carlile, 258 U.S. 138, 42 S.Ct. 227, 66 L.Ed. 511; Farley v. Hein-inger, 70 App.D.C. 200, 105 F.2d 79.