Case Name: The State of Ohio, Appellant, v. Dixon, Appellee
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1995-03-15
Citations: 71 Ohio St. 3d 608
Docket Number: No. 94-220
Parties: The State of Ohio, Appellant, v. Dixon, Appellee.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 71
Pages: 608–609

Head Matter:
The State of Ohio, Appellant, v. Dixon, Appellee.
[Cite as State v. Dixon (1995), 71 Ohio St.3d 608.]
(No. 94-220
Submitted February 7, 1995
Decided March 15, 1995.)
William F. Schenck, Greene County Prosecuting Attorney, and Robert K. Hendrix, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.
Martin, McCarty, Richman & Wright Co., L.P.A., and Gary E. Wright, for appellee.

Opinion:
The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed as to the certified issue only, and the judgment of the trial court is reinstated on the authority of State v. Murphy (1990), 49 Ohio St.3d 206, 551 N.E.2d 932.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.