Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Frank WALLACE and R. M. Makemson, doing business as Wallace and Wallace, a partnership, Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1950-12-20
Citations: 185 F.2d 676
Docket Number: No. 12529
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Frank WALLACE and R. M. Makemson, doing business as Wallace and Wallace, a partnership, Appellees.
Judges: Before STEPHENS and HEALY, Circuit Judges, and MATHES, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 185
Pages: 676–676

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Frank WALLACE and R. M. Makemson, doing business as Wallace and Wallace, a partnership, Appellees.
No. 12529.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
Dec. 20, 1950.
H. G. Morison, Asst. Atty. Gen., Frank E. Flynn, U. S. Atty., E. R. Thurman, Asst. S. Atty., Phoenix, Ariz., George A. Frult< Attorney, Dept, of Justice, Wash-ington, D. C., (Joseph M. Friedman, Sp. Asst to Atty- Gen., J- Gregory Bruce and John G. Roberts, Attorneys, Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., of counsel) for appellant.
Evans, Hull, Kitchel & Jenckes and Norman S. Hull, all of Phoenix, Ariz., for appellee.
Before STEPHENS and HEALY, Circuit Judges, and MATHES, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the District Court is affirmed. See United States v. Pacific Fruit and Produce Co., 9 Cir., 1943, 138 F.2d 367, cf. Bolten v. General Motors Corp., 7 Cir., 1950, 180 F.2d 379.