Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher Lee SHADE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-03-16
Citations: 318 F. App'x 246
Docket Number: No. 08-6927
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Christopher Lee SHADE, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 318
Pages: 246–246

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Christopher Lee SHADE, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 08-6927.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 12, 2009.
Decided: March 16, 2009.
Brian Joseph Kornbrath, Federal Public Defender, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellant. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Lee Shade appeals the district court's order granting in part and denying in part his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Shade, No. 3:02-cr-00045-JPB-M (N.D.W.Va. May 28, 2008). See United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir.2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.