Case Name: Richard O. READ, Appellant, v. Henry W. STIMSON, Secretary of War, et al., Appellees; Richard O. READ, Appellant, v. A. Ray ASHCRAFT, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1945-11-13
Citations: 152 F.2d 287
Docket Number: Nos. 8988, 9056
Parties: Richard O. READ, Appellant, v. Henry W. STIMSON, Secretary of War, et al., Appellees. Richard O. READ, Appellant, v. A. Ray ASHCRAFT, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 152
Pages: 287–287

Head Matter:
Richard O. READ, Appellant, v. Henry W. STIMSON, Secretary of War, et al., Appellees. Richard O. READ, Appellant, v. A. Ray ASHCRAFT, Appellee.
Nos. 8988, 9056.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia.
Submitted Oct. 24, 1945.
Decided Nov. 13, 1945.
Mr. Richard O. Read, appellant, pro se.
Messrs. Edward M. Curran, United States Attorney and Charles B. Murray and Daniel B. Maher, Assistant United States Attorneys, all of Washington, D. C., for ap-pellees.
Before GRONER, Chief Justice, and CLARK and PRETTYMAN, Associate Justices.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
These are appeals from judgments of the United States District Court, denying appellant's petitions for injunctions and dismissing the actions in No. 8988 and No. 9056. The ground on which the court acted in each case is that the complaint fails to state a cause of action on which relief may be granted.
We have carefully gone through each record made in the court below and are of opinion that the action of the court in each instance was entirely correct.
Affirmed.