Case Name: Guy HAMMOND, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-01-06
Citations: 752 So. 2d 559
Docket Number: No. SC94780
Parties: Guy HAMMOND, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 752
Pages: 559–560

Head Matter:
Guy HAMMOND, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. SC94780.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Jan. 6, 2000.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Timothy J. Ferreri, Assistant Public Defender, Tenth Judicial Circuit, Bar-tow, Florida, for Petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Robert J. Krauss, Senior Assistant Attorney General, and Patricia E. Davenport, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, Florida, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted the decision in Hammond v. State, 727 So.2d 979 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999), for review based on alleged express and direct conflict with our opinion in Trotter v. State, 576 So.2d 691 (Fla.1990). Upon closer examination and after oral argument in this case, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for review.
It is so ordered.
HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
PARIENTE, J., concurs specially with an opinion.
ANSTEAD, J., dissents.