Case Name: STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Respondent v. Daniel Michael ROGERS, Defendant and Appellant; STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Gayla ROGERS, Defendant and Appellant
Court: Utah Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Utah
Decision Date: 1968-07-17
Citations: 21 Utah 2d 234
Docket Number: Nos. 10850, 10851
Parties: STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Respondent v. Daniel Michael ROGERS, Defendant and Appellant. STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Gayla ROGERS, Defendant and Appellant.
Judges: CALLISTER and TUCKETT, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Utah Reports, Second Series
Volume: 21
Pages: 234–238

Head Matter:
444 P.2d 54
STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Respondent v. Daniel Michael ROGERS, Defendant and Appellant. STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Gayla ROGERS, Defendant and Appellant.
Nos. 10850, 10851.
Supreme Court of Utah.
July 17, 1968.
Norman Wade, Salt Lake City, for defendants and appellants.
Gerald G. Gundry, Asst. Atty. Gen., Phil L. Hansen, Atty. Gen., Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and respondent.

Opinion:
HENRIOD, Justice:
Appeal from an alleged erroneous failure to grant a motion to suppress evidence. Affirmed.
This case comes to us under a so-called "Partial Transcript." One point only is urged: That there was an illegal search of a car owned by one of the defendants after an alleged nocturnal sortie at a laundromat where coins were purloined by defendants. The -veniremen found that allegation factually to be true. An examination of the record as partially designated impresses us that there was no illegal or unreasonable search and seizure, and we so hold.
CALLISTER and TUCKETT, JJ., concur.
CROCKETT, C. J., concurs, and also-concurs in the concurring opinion of ELLETT, J.