Case Name: Gearlean B. PARKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dr. Lind W. CHINNERY, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-10-26
Citations: 146 F. App'x 683
Docket Number: No. 05-1755
Parties: Gearlean B. PARKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dr. Lind W. CHINNERY, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 146
Pages: 683–684

Head Matter:
Gearlean B. PARKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dr. Lind W. CHINNERY, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 05-1755.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 20, 2005.
Decided Oct. 26, 2005.
Gearlean B. Parker, Appellant Pro Se. Darren Thomas Marting, Leclair Ryan, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Gearlean B. Parker appeals the district court's order dismissing her action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because she failed to allege any basis for federal jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Parker v. Chinnery, No. CA-05-3-4 (E.D. Va. June 16, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED