Case Name: Leo Kauder, complainant-appellant, v. Solomon Lautman et al., defendants-respondents
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1934-03-04
Citations: 116 N.J. Eq. 145
Docket Number: 
Parties: Leo Kauder, complainant-appellant, v. Solomon Lautman et al., defendants-respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 116
Pages: 145–145

Head Matter:
Leo Kauder, complainant-appellant, v. Solomon Lautman et al., defendants-respondents.
[Decided March 4th, 1934.]
Mr. Demid Goldstein, for the appellant.
Mr. Isaiah Matlock, for the respondents.

Opinion:
Pee Cueiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Yice-Chancellor Berry, and reported in 114 N. J. Eq. 197.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Teenchaed, Case, Bodine, Donges, Peeskie, Hetfibld, Deae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 10.
For reversal — Paekee, Lloyd, Hehee, Yan Buskiek, Kays, JJ. 5.