Case Name: James Anthony MAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dr. Nina WARD; Nurse G. Mullen, Defendants-Appellees; James Anthony May, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Scott Brain; James R. Chellis; Jane Doe; Dr. Phillip Perkins, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-11-06
Citations: 487 F. App'x 81
Docket Number: Nos. 12-7057, 12-7071
Parties: James Anthony MAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dr. Nina WARD; Nurse G. Mullen, Defendants-Appellees. James Anthony May, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Scott Brain; James R. Chellis; Jane Doe; Dr. Phillip Perkins, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 487
Pages: 81–81

Head Matter:
James Anthony MAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dr. Nina WARD; Nurse G. Mullen, Defendants-Appellees. James Anthony May, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Scott Brain; James R. Chellis; Jane Doe; Dr. Phillip Perkins, Defendants-Appellees.
Nos. 12-7057, 12-7071.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 2, 2012.
Decided: Nov. 6, 2012.
James Anthony May, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James Anthony May appeals the district court's orders dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaints. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. May v. Ward, No. 5:11-ct-03065-FL (E.D.N.C. June 8, 2012); May. v. Brain, No. 5:11-ct-03088-FL (E.D.N.C. June 8, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.