Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Daniel Elias, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2016-10-19
Citations: 143 A.D.3d 908
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Daniel Elias, Appellant.
Judges: Eng, P.J., Balkin, Dickerson, Hinds-Radix and Barros, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 143
Pages: 908–909

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Daniel Elias, Appellant.
[38 NYS3d 916]

Opinion:
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D'Emic, J.), imposed June 25, 2014, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 266 [2011]; People v Barksdale, 131 AD3d 704 [2015]), and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).
Eng, P.J., Balkin, Dickerson, Hinds-Radix and Barros, JJ., concur.