Case Name: Nesrien AZURIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2018-10-17
Citations: 256 So. 3d 900
Docket Number: No. 4D17-2861
Parties: Nesrien AZURIN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 256
Pages: 900–901

Head Matter:
Nesrien AZURIN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D17-2861
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
[October 17, 2018]
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Peggy Natale, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marc B. Hernandez, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Affirmed.
Gerber, C.J. and May, J., concur.
Ciklin, J., concurs with opinion.
I concur in the decision to affirm. I write to draw attention to a problem presented somewhat regularly in the cases that come before this court: trial counsel's failure to preserve error. In this case, the lack of preservation was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. This is not always the case.
Non-specific and non-articulated evidentiary objections by any party to a proceeding are categorically unacceptable and the profession should be alarmed at the frequency with which this lack of basic legal acumen takes place.