Case Name: In the Matter of R. Bertil Peterson, Petitioner, v. State of New York Department of Motor Vehicles et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2011-12-27
Citations: 90 A.D.3d 1055
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of R. Bertil Peterson, Petitioner, v State of New York Department of Motor Vehicles et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 90
Pages: 1055–1055

Head Matter:
In the Matter of R. Bertil Peterson, Petitioner, v State of New York Department of Motor Vehicles et al., Respondents.
[934 NYS2d 837]

Opinion:
The determination that the petitioner violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1225-c is supported by substantial evidence. The petitioner's challenge to the administrative determination rests upon an issue of credibility which was primarily for the fact-finder to resolve, and we see no basis to overturn the factfinder's determination (see Matter of Hildreth v New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs. Appeals Bd., 83 AD3d 838 [2011]). Dillon, J.P., Balkin, Leventhal and Chambers, JJ., concur.