Case Name: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY, et al., Appellants, v. Francis T. DESMOND, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-11-08
Citations: 568 So. 2d 1354
Docket Number: No. 90-1265
Parties: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY, et al., Appellants, v. Francis T. DESMOND, Appellee.
Judges: COBB and COWART, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, A.R., Associate Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 568
Pages: 1354–1355

Head Matter:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY, et al., Appellants, v. Francis T. DESMOND, Appellee.
No. 90-1265.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Nov. 8, 1990.
John C. Lenderman of Harris, Barrett, Mann & Dew, St. Petersburg, for appellants.
Frank J. Bankowitz, Orlando, for appel-lee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a non-final order denying a motion to dismiss filed on the grounds that notice had not been timely given the governmental agency-defendant and that the statute of limitations had expired. This order is not subject to appellate review at this stage under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130 and the appeal is therefore dismissed. See Page v. Ezell, 452 So.2d 582 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
COBB and COWART, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, A.R., Associate Judge, concur.
. Certiorari is not appropriate in the case of such an order because the error is correctable on appeal of an adverse final judgment. We therefore do not elect to consider the appeal as an application for that relief.