Case Name: Jesus Enrique BRIONES, Petitioner, v. Lucy SOLOMON, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Texas
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1992-12-31
Citations: 842 S.W.2d 278
Docket Number: No. D-1093
Parties: Jesus Enrique BRIONES, Petitioner, v. Lucy SOLOMON, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 842
Pages: 278–278

Head Matter:
Jesus Enrique BRIONES, Petitioner, v. Lucy SOLOMON, Respondent.
No. D-1093.
Supreme Court of Texas.
Dec. 31, 1992.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
A demand for postjudgment interest arises from the judicial process rather than directly from a commercial or consumer transaction, and is therefore not a "charging" under the usury laws. George A. Fuller Co. v. Carpet Services, Inc., 823 S.W.2d 603, 605 (Tex.1992). The court of appeals rendered the correct judgment because respondent presented the point that there was no charging of usurious interest. We neither approve nor disapprove any portion of the court of appeals opinion. 805 S.W.2d 916. Petitioner's motion for rehearing is overruled.