Case Name: STATE of Missouri ex rel. CITY OF SULLIVAN, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Roy L. CARROLL, et al., Exceptions of Steven Kempke and Richard Kempke, Defendants/Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-04-21
Citations: 964 S.W.2d 889
Docket Number: No. 69807
Parties: STATE of Missouri ex rel. CITY OF SULLIVAN, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Roy L. CARROLL, et al., Exceptions of Steven Kempke and Richard Kempke, Defendants/Respondents.
Judges: Before CRANE, P.J., and RHODES RUSSELL and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 964
Pages: 889–889

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri ex rel. CITY OF SULLIVAN, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Roy L. CARROLL, et al., Exceptions of Steven Kempke and Richard Kempke, Defendants/Respondents.
No. 69807.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
April 21, 1998.
David L. Hoven, Vincent & Hoven, P.C., Matthew A. Schroeder, Union, for appellant.
Steven L. Leonard, Leonard & Lenze, P.C., Clayton, for respondents.
Before CRANE, P.J., and RHODES RUSSELL and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The City of Sullivan appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in a condemnation case. We affirm.
The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).