Case Name: ROSA ALLEN v. TOWN OF BESSEMER CITY
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 1934-06-20
Citations: 206 N.C. 915
Docket Number: 
Parties: ROSA ALLEN v. TOWN OF BESSEMER CITY.
Judges: Sci-ienck, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Reporter: North Carolina Reports
Volume: 206
Pages: 915–916

Head Matter:
ROSA ALLEN v. TOWN OF BESSEMER CITY.
(Filed 20 June, 1934.)
Civil ACTION, before Harding, J., at December Term, 1933, of GASTON.
Plaintiff alleged and offered evidence tending to show that tbe American Cotton Mills, Incorporated, owned a certain village for tbe use of its employees and bad opened a street through tbe property, which was habitually used by employees in going to and from work in tbe mill, and that the defendant town by virtue of an easement, had installed a manhole in one of said paths or streets; that the same was maintained in a negligent manner by virtue of the fact that an unguarded and unlighted manhole was situated near the edge of the pathway, and that in using the pathway to reach the mill she stumbled over said manhole, sustaining serious and permanent injuries.
Issues of negligence, contributory negligence and damages were submitted to the jury. The jury answered the issue of negligence “No,” and from judgment upon the verdict the plaintiff appealed.
S. J. Durham and J. L. Hamme for plaintiff.
A. G. Jones and P. C. Proneberger for town of Bessemer City.

Opinion:
Pee OubiaM.
The facts in this case are the same as detailed in the case of Allen v. Cotton Mills, ante, 104. A perusal of the record and an examination of exceptions taken by the plaintiff fail to disclose reversible error. See Atkinson v. Mills Co., 201 N. C., 5.
Affirmed.
Sci-ienck, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.