Case Name: David FELLING and Dennis Fitzwilliam, Appellants, v. Larry GILES, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-02-24
Citations: 962 S.W.2d 944
Docket Number: No. 72060
Parties: David FELLING and Dennis Fitzwilliam, Appellants, v. Larry GILES, Respondent.
Judges: Before GRIMM, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 962
Pages: 944–945

Head Matter:
David FELLING and Dennis Fitzwilliam, Appellants, v. Larry GILES, Respondent.
No. 72060.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Feb. 24, 1998.
Gary Siegel, Wittner, Poger, Rosenblum, Spewak, Clayton, for appellant.
Hugh R. Law, Lowenhaupt, Chasnof, L.L.C., St. Louis, for respondent.
Before GRIMM, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellants, David Felling and Dennis Fitz-william, appeal the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis entered in favor of respondent, Larry Giles, on plaintiffs' petition insofar as the court held no partnership existed between the parties and further found appellants were not entitled to an accounting. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcript and find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. As no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).