Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. BRENT EVAN WEBSTER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2010-12-15
Citations: 239 Or. App. 598
Docket Number: CR0811685; A140440
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. BRENT EVAN WEBSTER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before Schuman, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Rosenblum, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 239
Pages: 598–599

Head Matter:
Submitted November 5,
reversed and remanded December 15, 2010
STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. BRENT EVAN WEBSTER, Defendant-Appellant.
Clackamas County Circuit Court
CR0811685; A140440
245 P3d 172
Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, and Irene B. Taylor, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.
John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Cecil A. Reniche-Smith, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Schuman, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Rosenblum, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Following a trial to the court on stipulated facts, defendant was convicted of driving while suspended. ORS 811.182. He appeals and asserts, among other things, that the trial court erred when it held a bench trial in the absence of a written waiver of his right to a jury trial. Although defendant did not preserve the asserted error before the trial court, he contends that we should review it as plain error. Because the record contains no written waiver or any other indication that defendant executed such a waiver, the state concedes that the trial court committed plain error. See Or Const, Art I, § 11; State v. Barber, 343 Or 525, 173 P3d 827 (2007) (reversing as plain error a conviction based on a stipulated facts trial conducted by the court without a written waiver of the defendant's right to jury trial). We agree and, for the reasons set forth in Barber, exercise our discretion to correct the error. Accordingly, defendant's conviction must be reversed and the case remanded for a new trial.
Reversed and remanded.