Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Michael SUTTLES, Appellant.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2019-06-11
Citations: 576 S.W.3d 615
Docket Number: No. ED 106859
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent,
v.
Michael SUTTLES, Appellant.
Judges: Before Philip M. Hess, P.J. and Robert G. Dowd, Jr. and Mary K. Hoff, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 576
Pages: 615–615

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent,
v.
Michael SUTTLES, Appellant.
No. ED 106859
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Filed: June 11, 2019
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: Stephen P. Ranz, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.
ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT: Eric Schmitt, Attorney General, Asst. Attorney General, P. O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899.
Before Philip M. Hess, P.J. and Robert G. Dowd, Jr. and Mary K. Hoff, JJ.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Michael Suttles appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions after a jury trial for statutory sodomy, sexual misconduct with a child and furnishing pornographic material to a minor. There was no error in the admission of expert testimony regarding the general characteristics of children disclosing allegations of sexual abuse. We affirm.
An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).