Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Newton COCKERILL, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-05-29
Citations: 10 F. App'x 183
Docket Number: No. 01-6382
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Newton COCKERILL, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 10
Pages: 183–183

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Newton COCKERILL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 01-6382.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 17, 2001.
Decided May 29, 2001.
Newton Coekerill, pro se. Jane Barrett Taylor, Office of the United States Attorney, Columbia, SC, for appellee.
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Newton Coekerill seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend the court's judgment denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Cockerill's motion to stay the briefing schedule, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Cockerill, Nos. CR-98-524-DWS; CA-00-2914-3 (D.S.C. Feb. 9 & 12, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.