Case Name: Rachel Campanaro, Respondent, v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1932-02
Citations: 235 A.D. 702
Docket Number: 
Parties: Rachel Campanaro, Respondent, v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 235
Pages: 702–703

Head Matter:
Rachel Campanaro, Respondent, v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America, Appellant.

Opinion:
Judgment and order of the City Court of Yonkers reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the prima facie ease made by the plaintiff, by the offering of the policy in evidence, was overcome when substantial evidence was offered by the defendant to the effect that the age of the insured was eleven years greater than that stated in the policy. (Potts v. Pardee, 220 N. Y. 431, 433.) The plaintiff offered no further evidence, as she might have done by showing the age of the insured by competent witnesses and by information acquired in the family prior to the insured's taking out the policy. (Wigm. Ev. [2d ed.] § 222, 660; Jones Ev. [1913] § 300; Commonwealth v. O'Brien, 134 Mass. 198; Winter v. State, 123 Ala. 1; St. Louis S. W. R. Co. v. Bowles, 32 Tex. Civ. App. 118; L. R. A. 1918A, 685, note 168.) Evidence on this subject, in order to rebut documentary evidence, must be reasonably strong and convincing. (Hartshorn v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 55 App. Div. 471; Bowen v. Preferred Accident Ins. Co., 68 id. 342.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.