Case Name: In the Matter of the Marriage of RHODES, Respondent, and RHODES, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1989-03-22
Citations: 95 Or. App. 754
Docket Number: CV87-0623; CA A48985
Parties: In the Matter of the Marriage of RHODES, Respondent, and RHODES, Appellant.
Judges: Before Joseph, Chief Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 95
Pages: 754–755

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted January 27,
affirmed March 22, 1989
In the Matter of the Marriage of RHODES, Respondent, and RHODES, Appellant.
(CV87-0623; CA A48985)
770 P2d 615
Larry W. Stuber, Corvallis, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Patrick L. Hadlock, Robert G. Ringo and Ringo & Stuber, P.C., Corvallis.
Steven P. Allen, Corvallis, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.
Before Joseph, Chief Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.
PER CURIAM
Edmonds, J., dissenting.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Even on de novo review, the burden is on the appellant to demonstrate that the trial court erred. McCoy and McCoy, 28 Or App 919, 562 P2d 207 (1977). Appellant has not met that burden, and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Affirmed. No costs to either party.