Case Name: Andrew WATERS, Appellant, v. STATE Of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2011-12-20
Citations: 354 S.W.3d 670
Docket Number: No. ED 94993
Parties: Andrew WATERS, Appellant, v. STATE Of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J. and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 354
Pages: 670–670

Head Matter:
Andrew WATERS, Appellant, v. STATE Of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 94993.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Dec. 20, 2011.
Jo Ann Rotermund, Public Defenders Office, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Foster, Attorney General, Dora A. Fichter, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J. and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Andrew Waters appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for postcon-viction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court did not err in denying Waters' request for post-conviction relief. We affirm.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).