Case Name: Haril H. KEMP a/k/a Antwan Kemp, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2005-06-29
Citations: 905 So. 2d 985
Docket Number: No. 3D04-2893
Parties: Haril H. KEMP a/k/a Antwan Kemp, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before GREEN, WELLS, and SHEPHERD, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 905
Pages: 985–986

Head Matter:
Haril H. KEMP a/k/a Antwan Kemp, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D04-2893.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
June 29, 2005.
Haril H. Kemp a/k/a Antwan Kemp, in proper person.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, for appellee.
Before GREEN, WELLS, and SHEPHERD, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the order denying defendant's motion to clarify the sentencing order rendered on July 22, 2003. Contrary to the state's contention in its response, no evidentiary hearing is required to resolve the issue in the defendant's motion. See Potter v. State, 769 So.2d 519 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).
The defendant's original motion to correct illegal sentence properly addressed the four cases in which he was sentenced: 99-21225; 99-21227; 99-21230; 99-26580. The trial court granted relief and resen-tenced defendant. However that order only listed one case number: 99-21225. It is self-evident that the trial court did not rule on the remaining case numbers-these cases were sentenced concurrently and were all properly addressed in defendant's original motion.
We therefore reverse and remand for the court to address the defendant's assertion — that the court overlooked the remaining three case numbers in ruling on defendant's motion to correct illegal sentence.
Reversed and remanded.