Case Name: M. A. Hoenecke v. United States
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1954-04-22
Citations: 32 Cust. Ct. 465
Docket Number: No. 58029; protest 129450-K (Minneapolis)
Parties: M. A. Hoenecke v. United States,
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Volume: 32
Pages: 465–466

Head Matter:
Before the Third Division,
April 22, 1954
No. 58029.
protest 129450-K (Minneapolis).
M. A. Hoenecke v. United States,

Opinion:
Opinion by
Ekwall, J.
It was stipulated that the appraisement of the merchandise and the liquidation of the entry were made in the same manner, under facts and circumstances the same in all material respects, as the appraisement and liquidation in The Gruen Watch Company v. United States (24 Cust. Ct. 101, C. D. 1216). In accordance with stipulation and following the tited .authority, it was held that a legal liquidation should be had which would form the basis for a protest in which, should he so desire, the importer may litigate any question presented by such action under section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.