Case Name: In re Joseph JOHNSON, Jr., Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-10-12
Citations: 20 F. App'x 206
Docket Number: No. 01-7052
Parties: In re Joseph JOHNSON, Jr., Petitioner.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 20
Pages: 206–206

Head Matter:
In re Joseph JOHNSON, Jr., Petitioner.
No. 01-7052.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 4, 2001.
Decided Oct. 12, 2001.
Joseph Johnson, Jr., petitioner pro se.
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Joseph Johnson, Jr., filed this mandamus petition requesting that this court direct the district court to amend its criminal judgment so as to comply within the dictates of U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5G1.3 (1998). Where there is another available remedy, mandamus relief is not available. In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir.1987). Mandamus relief is not a substitute for appeal. In re United Steelworkers, 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir.1979). Johnson could have challenged his sentence in a direct appeal of the criminal judgment or in his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001) motion. He did neither, however. Accordingly, we deny mandamus relief. We deny Johnson's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.