Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Anthony WILLIAMS, Appellant; Anthony WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-06-27
Citations: 900 S.W.2d 280
Docket Number: Nos. 64877, 66810
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Anthony WILLIAMS, Appellant. Anthony WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GRIMM, C.J., REINHARD, P.J., and CRAHAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 900
Pages: 280–280

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Anthony WILLIAMS, Appellant. Anthony WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 64877, 66810.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
June 27, 1995.
Robert E. Steele, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before GRIMM, C.J., REINHARD, P.J., and CRAHAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant, Anthony Williams, appeals the judgment entered upon his conviction of second degree robbery and the denial of his Rule 29.16 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the judgment of the trial court was supported by substantial evidence. Further, the denial of Defendant's Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing was not clearly erroneous. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgments are affirmed pursuant to Rules 84.16(b) and 30.26(b).