Case Name: B. B. WOODSON, Trustee, Appellant, v. Bernard P. CHAMBERLAIN, Appellee. In the Matter of Sterling R. DECKER, Bankrupt
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1963-11-18
Citations: 324 F.2d 505
Docket Number: No. 9028
Parties: B. B. WOODSON, Trustee, Appellant, v. Bernard P. CHAMBERLAIN, Appellee. In the Matter of Sterling R. DECKER, Bankrupt.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 324
Pages: 505–505

Head Matter:
B. B. WOODSON, Trustee, Appellant, v. Bernard P. CHAMBERLAIN, Appellee. In the Matter of Sterling R. DECKER, Bankrupt.
No. 9028.
United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.
Argued Nov. 8, 1963.
Decided Nov. 18, 1963.
See also 4 Cir., 317 F.2d 245.
William S. Aaron, Jr., Charlottesville, Va. (Walker, Woodson & Aaron, Charlottesville, Va., on brief), for appellant.
Henry E. Belt, Charlottesville, Va., for appellee.
Before HAYNSWORTH, BOREMAN and BRYAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The District Court construed the contingent provision for credit on the bond to be operable only with respect to the excess cost of improvements actually accomplished or to be accomplished. Since the improvements were not undertaken, and it now conclusively appears that they never will be undertaken, the District Judge concluded that the contingent provision for credit on the bond was inapplicable.
For the reasons more fully stated by the District Judge in his opinion, we find his construction of the endorsement on the bond to be correct.
Affirmed.
In the Matter of Sterling R. Decker, Bankrupt, D.C., 211 F.Supp. 761.