Case Name: In the Matter of Ricky R. Stewart, Jr., Petitioner, v. Barry J. McArdle, as Superintendent of Watertown Correctional Facility, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2017-04-27
Citations: 149 A.D.3d 1452
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Ricky R. Stewart, Jr., Petitioner, v Barry J. McArdle, as Superintendent of Watertown Correctional Facility, Respondent.
Judges: McCarthy, J.P., Garry, Egan Jr., Devine and Aarons, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 149
Pages: 1452–1453

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Ricky R. Stewart, Jr., Petitioner, v Barry J. McArdle, as Superintendent of Watertown Correctional Facility, Respondent.
[50 NYS3d 896]

Opinion:
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
After an envelope addressed to petitioner's mother was discovered to contain a card addressed to his children who were the subject of an order of protection, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with violating facility correspondence procedures. Following a tier II disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of the charge and that determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
We confirm. The misbehavior report, the envelope that petitioner addressed to his mother containing the card addressed to his children, the order of protection and petitioner's testimony at the hearing provide substantial evidence to support the determination that petitioner violated correspondence procedures (see Matter of Cortorreal v Goord, 41 AD3d 1048, 1048 [2007]; Matter of Goldberg v Goord, 11 AD3d 841, 841 [2004]). Petitioner's denial of any misconduct, claiming that he sent the children's card to his mother so that she could hold it until such time as it was legally permissible to give to the chil dren, presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Cole v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 87 AD3d 1243, 1243 [2011]).
McCarthy, J.P., Garry, Egan Jr., Devine and Aarons, JJ., concur.
Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.