Case Name: In re David Francis MILLER, III, Debtor, Bank of America, N.A., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David Francis Miller, III, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-10-07
Citations: 618 F. App'x 654
Docket Number: No. 14-13503
Parties: In re David Francis MILLER, III, Debtor, Bank of America, N.A., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David Francis Miller, III, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before MARCUS, WILLIAM PRYOR, and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 618
Pages: 654–654

Head Matter:
In re David Francis MILLER, III, Debtor, Bank of America, N.A., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David Francis Miller, III, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 14-13503
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Oct. 7, 2015.
Craig Goldblatt, Danielie Spinelli, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr, LLP, Washington, DC, Bret Jacob Chaness, Rubin Lublin, LLC, Peachtree Corners, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Charles Moses Clapp, Hyslip & Taylor, LLC, LPA, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before MARCUS, WILLIAM PRYOR, and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
In this appeal, Bank of America, N.A. challenges the district court's summary af-firmance of the bankruptcy court's order voiding a wholly unsecured second priority lien on residential property owned by a Chapter 7 debtor. We kept the appeal in abeyance pending review by the Supreme Court of our decisions in Bank of Am., N.A. v. Caulkett (In re Caulkett), 566 Fed.Appx. 879 (11th Cir.2014), and in Bank of Am., N.A. v. Toledo-Cardona (In re Toledo-Cardona), 556 Fed.Appx. 911 (11th Cir. 2014).
Because the Supreme Court has now disposed of these cases in Bank of America v. Caulkett, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 1995, 192 L.Ed.2d 52 (2015), we grant Bank of America's motion to lift the stay of this appeal.
In the light of the Supreme Court's decision in Caulkett and this Court's decision in Waits v. Bank of Am., N.A. (In re Waits), 793 F.3d 1267 (11th Cir.2015), we deny Bank of America's motion for summary reversal, vacate the district court's judgment, and remand for further proceedings consistent with Caulkett.
VACATED AND REMANDED.