Case Name: Bullerdick et al. v. Miller et al.
Court: Appellate Court of Indiana
Jurisdiction: Indiana
Decision Date: 1927-04-08
Citations: 86 Ind. App. 66
Docket Number: No. 12,588
Parties: Bullerdick et al. v. Miller et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Indiana Court of Appeals Reports
Volume: 86
Pages: 66–67

Head Matter:
Bullerdick et al. v. Miller et al.
[No. 12,588.
Filed April 8, 1927.]
Henry W. Moore, for appellants.
Bernard C. Craig, for appellees.

Opinion:
Nichols, J. —
This was an independent action, under §589 Burns 1914, §614 Bums 1926, to procure a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence. The original action was appealed to this court on the merits, the error assigned being the action of the court in overruling appellant's motion for a new trial for cause. See Bullerdick v. Miller (1926), 85 Ind. App. 369, 152 N. E. 280. The judgment on that appeal having been reversed with instructions to the trial court to grant a new trial, the question here involved becomes moot.
The appeal is therefore dismissed.