Case Name: Barbara L. HURLEY, Petitioner/Respondent, v. James A. HURLEY, Respondent/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1992-09-15
Citations: 838 S.W.2d 489
Docket Number: No. 61029
Parties: Barbara L. HURLEY, Petitioner/Respondent, v. James A. HURLEY, Respondent/Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 838
Pages: 489–490

Head Matter:
Barbara L. HURLEY, Petitioner/Respondent, v. James A. HURLEY, Respondent/Appellant.
No. 61029.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Sept. 15, 1992.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 26, 1992.
C. Finn Sheehan, High Ridge, for respondent/appellant.
David J. Barton, Arnold, for petitioner/respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
Husband appeals from those portions of the dissolution decree dividing the marital property and awarding costs. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the trial court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).