Case Name: In re: John W. MARONEY, Esq., Claimant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-07-20
Citations: 14 F. App'x 902
Docket Number: No. 00-35445; D.C. No. CV-97-00609-MISC
Parties: In re: John W. MARONEY, Esq., Claimant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 14
Pages: 902–903

Head Matter:
In re: John W. MARONEY, Esq., Claimant-Appellant.
No. 00-35445.
D.C. No. CV-97-00609-MISC.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 9, 2001.
Decided July 20, 2001.
Before KOZINSKI, T.G. NELSON, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
John W. Maroney appeals the district court's order disbarring him from practice before the United States District Court for the District of Oregon. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the district court's disbarment proceedings for an abuse of discretion. See Patterson v. Standing Subcomm. of Discipline to the Bar of the United States Dist Court for the Dist. of Or. (In re Patterson), 176 F.2d 966, 968 n. 1 (9th Cir.1949). We affirm.
Maroney was given an opportunity for a hearing on his disbarment pursuant to the District of Oregon former Local Rule 110-6. After requesting a hearing, however, Maroney withdrew that request. Accordingly, the district court did not err in its April 18, 2000 order disbarring Maroney from practice.
Maroney's contentions lack merit.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.