Case Name: Arthur Parsons, Respondent, v. W. F. Clark et al., Appellants
Court: Washington Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Washington
Decision Date: 1930-06-10
Citations: 157 Wash. 697
Docket Number: No. 22189
Parties: Arthur Parsons, Respondent, v. W. F. Clark et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Washington Reports
Volume: 157
Pages: 697–697

Head Matter:
[No. 22189.
Department One.
June 10, 1930.]
Arthur Parsons, Respondent, v. W. F. Clark et al., Appellants.
Rigg & Brown, Reynolds, Ballinger, Hutson & Boldt, for appellants.
McAulay & Freece and LeRoy McCann, for respondent.
Reported in 289 Pac. 22.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
-This is a companion case to that of Van Cello v. Clark, ante p. 321, 289 Pac. 19, the cases being before us upon one statement of facts although two transcripts were filed and the causes in this court docketed separately.
For the reasons assigned in the companion case of Van Cello v. Clark, supra, the judgment appealed from is reversed, with directions to grant appellants' motion for a new trial.