Case Name: Don MATTHEWS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-11-22
Citations: 663 So. 2d 9
Docket Number: No. 95-126
Parties: Don MATTHEWS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 663
Pages: 9–9

Head Matter:
Don MATTHEWS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 95-126.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 22, 1995.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Craig J. Troeino, Special Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Angelica D. Zayas and Avi J. Litwin, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the entire record, which contains overwhelming and essentially unrebutted evidence of the defendant's guilt, we conclude that the undoubted errors involving the prosecutor's final argument and the admission of evidence were harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986). Hence, the convictions are affirmed. As the state concedes, the defendant was improperly sentenced to a concurrent twelve-year term for possession of cocaine; on remand, that sentence shall be reduced to the statutory maximum of a five-year concurrent sentence. § 775.082(3)(d), 893.13(l)(f), Fla.Stat. (1991). The sentences are otherwise also affirmed.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part.