Case Name: Johnnie Ivey JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PITT COUNTY SCHOOLS; Jennifer Poplin, Principal of E.B. Aycock Middle School; Delilah Jackson, Superintendent of HR; Beverly Emory, Superintendent of all Pitt County Schools; Glen Buck, Director of Classified Personnel, Defendants-Appel-lees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-07-01
Citations: 577 F. App'x 216
Docket Number: No. 14-1344
Parties: Johnnie Ivey JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PITT COUNTY SCHOOLS; Jennifer Poplin, Principal of E.B. Aycock Middle School; Delilah Jackson, Superintendent of HR; Beverly Emory, Superintendent of all Pitt County Schools; Glen Buck, Director of Classified Personnel, Defendants-Appel-lees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 577
Pages: 216–216

Head Matter:
Johnnie Ivey JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PITT COUNTY SCHOOLS; Jennifer Poplin, Principal of E.B. Aycock Middle School; Delilah Jackson, Superintendent of HR; Beverly Emory, Superintendent of all Pitt County Schools; Glen Buck, Director of Classified Personnel, Defendants-Appel-lees.
No. 14-1344.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 26, 2014.
Decided: July 1, 2014.
Johnnie Ivey Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel William Clark, Tharrington Smith, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appel-lees.
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Johnnie Ivey Johnson appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his complaint and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Pitt Cnty. Schs., No. 4:12-cv-00191-BR (E.D.N.C. Nov. 12, 2013 & Mar. 11, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.