Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Albert BROOKS, Appellant; Albert BROOKS, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1996-04-02
Citations: 922 S.W.2d 815
Docket Number: Nos. 65562, 67489
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Albert BROOKS, Appellant. Albert BROOKS, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and GRIMM, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 922
Pages: 815–816

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Albert BROOKS, Appellant. Albert BROOKS, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 65562, 67489.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
April 2, 1996.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 15,1996.
Application to Transfer Denied June 25,1996.
Raymund J. Capelovitch, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, David G. Brown, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for Respondent.
Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and GRIMM, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant appeals denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. A direct appeal after sentencing on charge of distribution of a controlled substance near a school, § 195.214 RSMo 1986 was abandoned. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).