Case Name: David HOWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer C.L. BOOYER; Cumberland County Sheriffs Department, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-04-01
Citations: 420 F. App'x 241
Docket Number: No. 10-7195
Parties: David HOWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer C.L. BOOYER; Cumberland County Sheriffs Department, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 420
Pages: 241–241

Head Matter:
David HOWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer C.L. BOOYER; Cumberland County Sheriffs Department, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 10-7195.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 17, 2011.
Decided: April 1, 2011.
David Howell, Appellant Pro Se. Ronnie Monroe Mitchell, Mitchell, Brewer, Richardson, Adams, Burge & Boughman, Fayetteville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
David Howell appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Howell v. Booyer, No. 5:09-ct-03043-FL, 2010 WL 3239072 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 16, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.