Case Name: Steven R. BORNHOP, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Michelle M. BORNHOP, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-09-22
Citations: 976 S.W.2d 622
Docket Number: No. 72997
Parties: Steven R. BORNHOP, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Michelle M. BORNHOP, Respondent.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., C.J., KAROHL, J., and ROBERT E. CRIST, Senior Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 976
Pages: 622–623

Head Matter:
Steven R. BORNHOP, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Michelle M. BORNHOP, Respondent.
No. 72997.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Sept. 22, 1998.
Michael A. Turken, St. Charles, for petitioner/appellant.
Michael P. Shea, St. Charles, for respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., C.J., KAROHL, J., and ROBERT E. CRIST, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Steven R. Bornhop (Father) appeals from the order of the trial court granting Michelle M. Bornhop's (Mother) motion for new trial or in the alternative motion for relief from judgment and order.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion and find no error of law. VonSande v. Von-Sande, 858 S.W.2d 283, 236 (Mo.App. S.D. 1993). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).