Case Name: JOSEPHUS BAUM et als. v. THE CURRITUCK SHOOTING CLUB
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 1886-02
Citations: 94 N.C. 217
Docket Number: 
Parties: JOSEPHUS BAUM et als. v. THE CURRITUCK SHOOTING CLUB.
Judges: 
Reporter: North Carolina Reports
Volume: 94
Pages: 217–218

Head Matter:
JOSEPHUS BAUM et als. v. THE CURRITUCK SHOOTING CLUB.
Appeal — Statement of the Case.
1. No appeal lies to this Court, unless a judgment has been entered. So, where the Court intimated an opinion that the plaintiff could not recover, and directed the issues to be found for the defendant, but entered no judgment, the appeal will not be entertained.
2. In such ease, the Court will remand the record, in order that the judgment may be entered.
3. The statement of the case on appeal should clearly point out the alleged error with sufficient certainty for the appellate court to understand them and so apply its rulings.
Civil action for the recovery of land, tried before Shepherd, Judge, and a jury, at Fall Term, 1885, of the Superior Court of Currituck County.
His Honor directed a verdict for the defendant on the evidence, and the plaintiffs appealed.
The facts appear fully in the opinion.
No counsel for the plaintiffs.
Mr. John Gatling for the defendant.

Opinion:
MbRRXMON, J.
Upon examination of the record, we find that on the trial, "at the close of the evidence, the court being of the opinion that the plaintiff could not recover, directed the issue to be found in the negative." There was a motion for a new trial, which was denied. It seems probable that it was intended that a final judgment should be entered in favor of the defendants, but none appears. The plaintiff appealed, as the record shows, from the order denying the motion for a new trial. It is obvious that an appeal did not lie from this order.
As we can see that it was probably intended that a proper judgment should be entered, which was omitted by inadvertence, we deem it proper to remand the case, to the end that such judgment may be entered.
As the appeal may come before us again, we suggest that the case settled upon appeal is obnoxious to serious objection. No errors are formally assigned, nor does it appear with reasonable certainty, if at all, upon what grounds the court based its instructions to the jury. There was much evidence, documentary and oral. Its application and bearings are not pointed out, nor do the same appear from its nature and effect. The alleged errors must be assigned with such precision as that this court can certainly see them, and apply the law. Otherwise, the judgment will be affirmed.
Let the case be remanded. It is so ordered.
Remanded.