Case Name: STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Daniel Lynn GOLDSACK, Defendant and Appellant
Court: North Dakota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: North Dakota
Decision Date: 2019-02-21
Citations: 923 N.W.2d 137
Docket Number: Nos. 20180265; 20180266
Parties: STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Daniel Lynn GOLDSACK, Defendant and Appellant
Judges: 
Reporter: North Western Reporter 2d
Volume: 923
Pages: 137–137

Head Matter:
STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Daniel Lynn GOLDSACK, Defendant and Appellant
Nos. 20180265
20180266
Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Filed February 21, 2019
Justin J. Schwarz, Assistant State's Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Russell J. Myhre, Enderlin, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Daniel Goldsack appeals from a district court's second amended criminal judgments revoking his probation. Goldsack argues the district court clearly erred in finding a probation violation occurred and the State did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence Goldsack violated the conditions of his probation. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (4) and (7). See, e.g., State v. McAvoy , 2007 ND 178, ¶ 9, 18, 741 N.W.2d 198 (holding the trial court's factual findings of a probation violation were not clearly erroneous and concluding the court did not abuse its discretion in revoking the defendant's probation).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Jon J. Jensen
Jerod E. Tufte