Case Name: Albert Hubschman, as Assignee of Schatzkin Trading Corporation, Appellant, v. George Hornstein and Another, Individually and as Copartners, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Hornstein & Hornstein, and Others, Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1934-06-21
Citations: 241 A.D. 531
Docket Number: 
Parties: Albert Hubschman, as Assignee of Schatzkin Trading Corporation, Appellant, v. George Hornstein and Another, Individually and as Copartners, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Hornstein & Hornstein, and Others, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 241
Pages: 531–532

Head Matter:
Albert Hubschman, as Assignee of Schatzkin Trading Corporation, Appellant, v. George Hornstein and Another, Individually and as Copartners, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Hornstein & Hornstein, and Others, Respondents.
First Department,
June 21, 1934.
Nahum A. Bernstein of counsel [Arnold M. Goldstein, attorney], for the appellant.
Alfred J. Talley of counsel [James A. McKaigney, George D. Hornstein and Abraham Hornstein with him on the brief; Talley & Lamb and Hornstein & Hornstein, attorneys], for the respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We are of the opinion that the application was not made in good faith. The complaint is very simple and covers but two and a half pages of the record. The failure to evidence good faith is shown in part by the notice of motion for the examination which contains 270 items, many of which are clearly without the slightest merit.
The order should be affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements.
Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Martin, O'Malley and Untermyer, JJ.; Finch, P. J., and Untermyer, J., dissent and vote for modification.