Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jill J. THOMPSON; Wilbur L. Thompson, Claimants-Appellants, and 1866.75 Board Feet and 11 Doors and Casings, More or Less, of Dipteryx Panamensis Imported from Nicaragua, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-09-22
Citations: 332 F. App'x 882
Docket Number: No. 09-1113
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jill J. THOMPSON; Wilbur L. Thompson, Claimants-Appellants, and 1866.75 Board Feet and 11 Doors and Casings, More or Less, of Dipteryx Panamensis Imported from Nicaragua, Defendant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 332
Pages: 882–883

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jill J. THOMPSON; Wilbur L. Thompson, Claimants-Appellants, and 1866.75 Board Feet and 11 Doors and Casings, More or Less, of Dipteryx Panamensis Imported from Nicaragua, Defendant.
No. 09-1113.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 2, 2009.
Decided: Sept. 22, 2009.
Jill J. Thompson, Wilbur L. Thompson, Appellants Pro Se. Stefan Dante Cassella, Natalie Ann Voris, Special Assistant United States Attorneys, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
. Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jill and Wilbur Thompson appeal the district court's orders granting Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, denying Appellants' motions to suppress and for sanctions, and denying leave to amend Appellants' answer. We have carefully reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Thompson, 587 F.Supp.2d 740 (E.D.Va.2008; entered Nov. 26, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.