Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rex Boyd WYNN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-08-04
Citations: 140 F. App'x 685
Docket Number: No. 04-30209
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Rex Boyd WYNN, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CALLAHAN and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 140
Pages: 685–686

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Rex Boyd WYNN, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 04-30209.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 1, 2005.
Decided Aug. 4, 2005.
Aaron N. Lucoff, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Boise, ID, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Bob E. Pangburn, Esq., Caldwell, ID, for Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho, Edward J. Lodge, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-03-00159-EJL.
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CALLAHAN and BEA, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Rex Boyd Wynn appeals his 192-month sentence following his guilty plea to distribution of methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We cannot determine from the record whether the district court would have imposed a materially different sentence if it had known that the Sentencing Guidelines were advisory rather than mandatory. Therefore, under United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc) and United States v. Moreno-Hernandez, 397 F.3d 1248, 1255 n. 8 (9th Cir.2005), amended by No. 03-30387, slip. op. 7773, 7794-95, 2005 WL 1560269 (9th Cir. July 5, 2005), we remand for the limited purpose of making that determination.
REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.