Case Name: Bridget Tabi BISONG, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, United States Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-11-15
Citations: 204 F. App'x 328
Docket Number: No. 06-1408
Parties: Bridget Tabi BISONG, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, United States Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 204
Pages: 328–328

Head Matter:
Bridget Tabi BISONG, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, United States Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 06-1408.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 18, 2006.
Decided: Nov. 15, 2006.
Randall L. Johnson, Johnson And Associates, P.C., Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Carol Federighi, Senior Litigation Counsel, Lindsay L. Chichester, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Bridget Tabi Bisong, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying as untimely her motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board's order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen. See INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24, 112 S.Ct. 719, 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Bisong, No. [ AXX-XXXXXX ] (B.I.A. Mar. 13, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.