Case Name: STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. JERRY JEFFRIES, Defendant
Court: Montana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Montana
Decision Date: 2004-12-03
Citations: 325 Mont. 116
Docket Number: No. DC-03-0576
Parties: STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. JERRY JEFFRIES, Defendant.
Judges: Alt. Chairperson, Hon. Gary Day, Member, Hon. John Whelan and Alt. Member, Hon. Randal Spaulding.
Reporter: Montana Reports
Volume: 325
Pages: 116–117

Head Matter:
STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. JERRY JEFFRIES, Defendant.
No. DC-03-0576
Decision

Opinion:
On February 5, 2004, the defendant was sentenced to the following: Count I: Fifteen (15) years in the Montana State Prison for the offense Operation of Unlawful Clandestine Laboratory, a felony; Count II: Fifteen (15) years in the Montana State Prison for the offense of Criminal Possession of Dangerous Drugs With Intent to Distribute, a felony; and Count III: Fifteen (15) years in the Montana State Prison for the offense of Criminal Possession of Dangerous Drugs With Intent to Distribute, a felony. The sentences shall run concurrently.
On November 19, 2004, the defendant's application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
The defendant was present and was represented by Jeff Michael. The state was represented by Rod Souza.
DATED this 3rd day of December, 2004.
Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.
Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that "the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive." (§46-18-904(3), MCA).
The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.
Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.
Done in open Court this 19th day of November, 2004.
Alt. Chairperson, Hon. Gary Day, Member, Hon. John Whelan and Alt. Member, Hon. Randal Spaulding.