Case Name: Glimmert BECKHAM, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1972-07-05
Citations: 264 So. 2d 30
Docket Number: No. 71-1207
Parties: Glimmert BECKHAM, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before CHARLES CARROLL, HEN-DRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 264
Pages: 30–31

Head Matter:
Glimmert BECKHAM, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 71-1207.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 5, 1972.
Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and Bennett H. Brummer, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.
Before CHARLES CARROLL, HEN-DRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The contention presented by the defendant as a ground for reversal of his con viction is ineffective assistance of his counsel in the handling of the cause in the trial court. There as here, the appellant was represented by the p'ublic defender. On the authority and reasoning of Geiger v. State, Fla.App.1969, 228 So.2d 449, the judgment is affirmed, without prejudice to apply in the trial court for relief under Rule 3.850 CrPR, 33 F.S.A.
It is so ordered.