Case Name: In the Matter of the Claim of Frank P. Bernard, Appellant. Edward Corsi, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1955-02-03
Citations: 285 A.D. 921
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Claim of Frank P. Bernard, Appellant. Edward Corsi, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 285
Pages: 921–921

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Claim of Frank P. Bernard, Appellant. Edward Corsi, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Opinion:
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which reversed the decision of a referee and reinstated the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from benefits on the ground he refused an offer of employment without good cause. This appeal presents but two issues: (1) whether, as a matter of law, claimant was entitled to be warned at the time of an interview that a refusal to accept a job offered to him might affect his rights to benefits; and (2) whether such a notice of job forfeiture was given to claimant at time of the interview as a matter of law. We find no issue raised as to the validity of the determination that appellant refused an offer of employment without good cause. We find no requirement in the statute that a claimant must be warned that his refusal to accept a job offer might affect his rights to unemployment insurance benefits. Moreover it appears in this case that claimant had a fair and complete hearing after the initial determination. After he had been served with the determination of disqualification made by the Industrial Commissioner he requested a hearing before an Unemployment Insurance Referee. He was given a hearing and was sworn as a witness, with the opportunity to produce any other witnesses he might desire. The Referee rendered his decision overruling the initial determination of the commissioner and the latter appealed to the board. The board decided the case on the basis of the record and the evidence submitted before the Referee. It thus appears that all the requirements of due process were met. Decision unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Imrie and Zeller, JJ.