Case Name: Royce MONK, et al. v. STATE of Louisiana, DOTD; Dana Vezinat, et al. v. State of Louisiana, DOTD; Marlin Lashley, et al. v. State of Louisiana, DOTD; Greg Harmon, et al. v. State of Louisiana, DOTD
Court: Louisiana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 2006-10-17
Citations: 940 So. 2d 642
Docket Number: No. 2005-C-2337
Parties: Royce MONK, et al. v. STATE of Louisiana, DOTD. Dana Vezinat, et al. v. State of Louisiana, DOTD. Marlin Lashley, et al. v. State of Louisiana, DOTD. Greg Harmon, et al. v. State of Louisiana, DOTD.
Judges: VICTORY and WEIMER, JJ., dissent and assign reasons.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 940
Pages: 642–643

Head Matter:
Royce MONK, et al. v. STATE of Louisiana, DOTD. Dana Vezinat, et al. v. State of Louisiana, DOTD. Marlin Lashley, et al. v. State of Louisiana, DOTD. Greg Harmon, et al. v. State of Louisiana, DOTD.
No. 2005-C-2337.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Oct. 17, 2006.
Charles C. Foti, Jr., Attorney General, John H. Ayres, III, David P. Spence, Assistant Attorneys General, for Applicant.
Chris J. Roy, Jr., A Law Corporation, Christopher J. Roy, Jr., Jacques M. Roy, Alexandria; Creed & Creed, Christian C. Creed, Monroe; Rivers, Beck, Dalrymple & Ledet, Eugene A. Ledet, Jr., Alexandria, Lloyd K. Milam, Tony K. Milam, Tony C. Tillman, Daniel C. Vidrine, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
| 1 Upon the State's writ application, we granted certiorari in this case. Monk, et al. v. State of Louisiana, DOTD, 05-C-2337 (La.3/24/06), 925 So.2d 1238. After hearing oral arguments and reviewing the issues raised in this matter, we conclude that the judgment below does not require the exercise of our supervisory authority. Accordingly, we recall our order of March 24, 2006, as improvidently granted, and we deny the State's application.
VICTORY and WEIMER, JJ., dissent and assign reasons.