Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan PINEDA-MORENO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-08-12
Citations: 617 F.3d 1120
Docket Number: No. 08-30385
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan PINEDA-MORENO, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: DIARMUID F. O’SCANNLAIN and N. RANDY SMITH, Circuit Judges, and CHARLES R. WOLLE, Senior District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 617
Pages: 1120–1127

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan PINEDA-MORENO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-30385.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Aug. 12, 2010.
Judith Harper, Assistant U.S. Attorney, USME-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Med-ford, OR, Amy Potter, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Portland, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Harrison Latto, Portland, OR, for Defendanb-Appellant.
D.C. No. l:07-CR-30036-PA, District of Oregon, Medford.
Before: DIARMUID F. O’SCANNLAIN and N. RANDY SMITH, Circuit Judges, and CHARLES R. WOLLE, Senior District Judge.
The Honorable Charles R. Wolle, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
Order; Dissent by Chief Judge Kozinski; Dissent by Judge Reinhardt.
ORDER
Judges O'Scannlain and N.R. Smith have voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Wolle has so recommended.
The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc, and the matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.