Case Name: LANKFORD v. THORNTON et al.
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1914-01-30
Citations: 145 N.Y.S. 1130
Docket Number: 
Parties: LANKFORD v. THORNTON et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 145
Pages: 1130–1130

Head Matter:
LANKFORD v. THORNTON et al.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
January 30, 1914.)
Action by Elizabeth Lankford against Annie E. Thornton and others.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The remedy against the legatee or heirs of a deceased debtor, being purely statutory, is controlled, defined, 'and regulated by the enactments now in force. Server v. Coe, 63 N. Y. 438. The right to pursue the successors in interest, such as legatees, is based on the fact, and to the extent only, that assets have been paid or distributed to such legatee. Section 1837, Code of Civil Procedure. So far as concerns the demurring legatee, Mr. McDermott, it is not alleged that the legacy to him has been paid, or that any assets of the estate have been distributed to him. This suit, begun in less than a year after the testator's death, was instituted before any such legacy could be lawfully paid. Section 2721, Code of Civil Procedure. Hence it was rightly held that the complaint as to this defendant does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The interlocutory judgment sustaining the demurrer is therefore affirmed, with costs, but with leave to the plaintiff to plead anew within 20 days upon payment of costs. See, also, 157 App. Div. 894, 142 N. Y. Supp. 1127.