Case Name: Glenn Calvin LAWHORN, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. E.E. WRIGHT, Jr., Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-08-01
Citations: 537 F. App'x 141
Docket Number: No. 13-6479
Parties: Glenn Calvin LAWHORN, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. E.E. WRIGHT, Jr., Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 537
Pages: 141–142

Head Matter:
Glenn Calvin LAWHORN, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. E.E. WRIGHT, Jr., Respondent-Appellee.
No. 13-6479.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 18, 2013.
Decided: Aug. 1, 2013.
Glenn Calvin Lawhorn, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Virginia Bidwell Theisen, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Glenn Calvin Lawhorn, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court's order denying re lief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.
We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Lawhorn has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.