Case Name: Louise L. Arnold, Respondent, v. Kate D. Bertolini, Appellant, and Edward L. Tinker et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Another
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1935-12-13
Citations: 269 N.Y. 603
Docket Number: 
Parties: Louise L. Arnold, Respondent, v. Kate D. Bertolini, Appellant, and Edward L. Tinker et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Another.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 269
Pages: 603–606

Head Matter:
Louise L. Arnold, Respondent, v. Kate D. Bertolini, Appellant, and Edward L. Tinker et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Another.
(Argued November 26, 1935;
decided December 13, 1935.)
Eugene Blanc, Jr., and Earl A. Barr for appellant.
Joseph Larocque for plaintiff-respondent.
J. A. Stevenson, Jr., for Annie R. Tinker Memorial Home, respondent.
Charles Furnald Smith for Edward L. Tinker, respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment should be modified to the extent of requiring Kate Darling Bertolini to deposit additional securities sufficient to yield sixty-five per cent of fifty per cent of the deficiency in income of the Annie R. Tinker obligation, and to pay sixty-five per cent of fifty per cent of the arrears in income arising under that obligation and the Annie R. Tinker Memorial Home is required to deposit additional securities sufficient to yield thirty-five per cent of fifty per cent of the deficiency in income and to pay thirty-five per cent of fifty per cent of the arrears in income.
The judgment of the Appellate Division and that of the Special Term should be modified in accordance with this opinion, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. (See 269 N. Y. 676.)
Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O'Brien, Htjbbs, Loughran, and Finch, JJ., concur. Crouch, J., not sitting.
Judgment accordingly.