Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jacqueline Lynne BRIDGES, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-06-20
Citations: 435 F. App'x 264
Docket Number: No. 11-6227
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jacqueline Lynne BRIDGES, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 435
Pages: 264–265

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jacqueline Lynne BRIDGES, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-6227.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 16, 2011.
Decided: June 20, 2011.
Jacqueline Lynne Bridges, Appellant pro se. Robert Michael Hamilton, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jacqueline Lynne Bridges appeals from the district court's order granting her motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), but sentencing her slightly higher within the applicable Guidelines range due to her post-sentencing conduct. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion. See United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir.2004). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Bridges, No. 1:05-cr-00244TDS-1 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 5, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.