Case Name: ANNA LOTT, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM LOTT, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1949-01-24
Citations: 1 N.J. 356
Docket Number: 
Parties: ANNA LOTT, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM LOTT, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 1
Pages: 356–356

Head Matter:
ANNA LOTT, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM LOTT, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Argued January 17, 1949
Decided January 24, 1949.
Mr. S. Sidney Silver argued the cause for the petitioner-appellant.
Mr. Charles M. Grosman argued the cause for the defendant-respondent (Messrs. Robert D. and Charles M. Grosman, attorneys).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We concur in the conclusion reached in the court below that the appellant failed to prove and corroborate the allegations of her petition. The decree is accordingly affirmed.
For affirmance: Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Case, Heher, Wacheneeld, Burling, and Ackerson—6.
For reversal: None.