Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Juan Carlos Garcia FLORES, also known as Carlos Flores Garcia, also known as Carlos Garcia, also known as Juan Carlos Garcia-Flores, also known as Juan Carlos Garcia, also known as Juan C. Garcia Hernandez, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-08-21
Citations: 475 F. App'x 978
Docket Number: No. 11-20598
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Juan Carlos Garcia FLORES, also known as Carlos Flores Garcia, also known as Carlos Garcia, also known as Juan Carlos Garcia-Flores, also known as Juan Carlos Garcia, also known as Juan C. Garcia Hernandez, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before SMITH, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 475
Pages: 978–979

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Juan Carlos Garcia FLORES, also known as Carlos Flores Garcia, also known as Carlos Garcia, also known as Juan Carlos Garcia-Flores, also known as Juan Carlos Garcia, also known as Juan C. Garcia Hernandez, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-20598
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 21, 2012.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Lourdes Rodriguez, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before SMITH, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Juan Carlos Garcia Flores has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Garcia Flores has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.