Case Name: Herbert Cecil Pelly, Resp't, v. Francess Naylor et al., Ex'rs, App'lts
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1892-11-18
Citations: 49 N.Y. St. Rep. 791
Docket Number: 
Parties: Herbert Cecil Pelly, Resp’t, v. Francess Naylor et al., Ex’rs, App’lts.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 49
Pages: 791–792

Head Matter:
Herbert Cecil Pelly, Resp’t, v. Francess Naylor et al., Ex’rs, App’lts.
(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department,
Filed November 18, 1892.)
Appeal from judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon verdict-directed by the court and from order denying motion for a new trial.
Edward S. Clinch, for app’lts; Birdseye, Cloyd & Bayliss (Luden Birdseye, of counsel), for resp’t.

Opinion:
Lawrence, J.
For the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the case of the same plaintiff against Onderdonk, we are of the opinion that the judgment and order below should be affirmed, with costs and disbursements.
Van Brunt, P. J., and O'Brien, J., concur in result.