Case Name: VICTOR FOODS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. MAGNA BANK OF ST. CHARLES COUNTY, et al., Defendants/Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-06-22
Citations: 998 S.W.2d 105
Docket Number: No. 74641
Parties: VICTOR FOODS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. MAGNA BANK OF ST. CHARLES COUNTY, et al., Defendants/Respondents.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., C.J., and KENT E. KAROHL, J., and CHARLES B. BLACKMAR, Senior Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 998
Pages: 105–106

Head Matter:
VICTOR FOODS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. MAGNA BANK OF ST. CHARLES COUNTY, et al., Defendants/Respondents.
No. 74641.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
June 22, 1999.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 3, 1999.
Application for Transfer Denied Sept. 21, 1999.
Edward B. Nangle, St. Louis, for appellant.
John T. Walsh, St. Louis, E. Darrell Davis, Jr., St. Charles, for respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., C.J., and KENT E. KAROHL, J., and CHARLES B. BLACKMAR, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Victor Foods, Inc., appeals from summary judgment entered on four counts, as follows: Count VI, Civil Conspiracy; Count VII, Prima Face Tort; Count VIII, Fraud; and Count IX, Negligent Misrepresentation.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).