Case Name: Michael John MANNING, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-10-22
Citations: 606 So. 2d 368
Docket Number: No. 79603
Parties: Michael John MANNING, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 606
Pages: 368–368

Head Matter:
Michael John MANNING, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 79603.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Oct. 22, 1992.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender and Allen J. DeWeese, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Michelle A. Smith, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We review State v. Manning, 595 So.2d 307 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), in which the court certified the same question answered by this Court in Scates v. State, 603 So.2d 504 (Fla.1992). Upon the authority of Scates, we answer the certified question in the affirmative. We quash the decision below and remand with directions to reinstate Manning's probation.
It is so ordered.
BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.