Case Name: Randall WYSE, Larry Jones, Mark Roberts, Latorrence Norris, Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge 5-30 and the Jacksonville Association of Fire Fighters, Local 122, IAFF, Petitioners, v. Frank DENTON, Mayor Alvin Brown, in his official capacity, the City of Jacksonville, and the Jacksonville Police and Fire Pension Fund Board of Trustees, Respondents
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2015-07-15
Citations: 167 So. 3d 525
Docket Number: No. 1D14-3684
Parties: Randall WYSE, Larry Jones, Mark Roberts, Latorrence Norris, Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge 5-30 and the Jacksonville Association of Fire Fighters, Local 122, IAFF, Petitioners, v. Frank DENTON, Mayor Alvin Brown, in his official capacity, the City of Jacksonville, and the Jacksonville Police and Fire Pension Fund Board of Trustees, Respondents.
Judges: WOLF, BENTON, and RAY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 167
Pages: 525–525

Head Matter:
Randall WYSE, Larry Jones, Mark Roberts, Latorrence Norris, Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge 5-30 and the Jacksonville Association of Fire Fighters, Local 122, IAFF, Petitioners, v. Frank DENTON, Mayor Alvin Brown, in his official capacity, the City of Jacksonville, and the Jacksonville Police and Fire Pension Fund Board of Trustees, Respondents.
No. 1D14-3684.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
July 15, 2015.
Paul A. Donnelly and James H. Sullivan III of Donnelly & Gross, P.A., Gainesville, for Petitioners.
George D. Gabel, Jr., Timothy J. Conner, and Jennifer Mansfield, of Holland & Knight, LLP, Jacksonville, for Respondent Frank Denton. David J. D’Agata, Assistant General Counsel, and Craig D. Feiser, Assistant General Counsel, City of Jacksonville, Jacksonville for Respondent City of Jacksonville. Robert D. Klausner, Stuart A. Kaufman, and Paul A. Daragjati of Klausner, Kaufman, Jensen, and Levin-son, P.A., Plantation, for Respondent Jacksonville Police and Fire Pension Fund Board of Trustees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed in part and denied in part. The portion challenging the final summary judgment is dismissed as untimely. The portion challenging the denial of Petitioners' motion to void the final summary judgment is denied because the trial court correctly ruled that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the motion. See First Union Nat'l Bank of Fla. v. Yost, 622 So.2d 111, 112 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).
DISMISSED in part and DENIED in part.
WOLF, BENTON, and RAY, JJ., concur.