Case Name: Joseph C. Parlato et al., Doing Business under the Name of Parlato Real Estate, Respondents, v. Albert L. Brinkman et al., Doing Business under the Name of Brinkman Bros., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1951-10-05
Citations: 279 A.D. 621
Docket Number: 
Parties: Joseph C. Parlato et al., Doing Business under the Name of Parlato Real Estate, Respondents, v. Albert L. Brinkman et al., Doing Business under the Name of Brinkman Bros., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 279
Pages: 621–621

Head Matter:
(October 5, 1951.)
Joseph C. Parlato et al., Doing Business under the Name of Parlato Real Estate, Respondents, v. Albert L. Brinkman et al., Doing Business under the Name of Brinkman Bros., Appellants.

Opinion:
Memorandum: The terms on which the seller listed the property for sale with the plaintiffs were not accepted by the proposed purchaser. The seller was not obliged to accept any different terms or to negotiate on any new terms. All concur, Me Cum and Vaughan, JJ., in result only, in the following memorandum: The complaint and bill of particulars when read together do not show that the plaintiff produced a purchaser ready, willing, and able to buy on the defendants' terms. Obviously the listing set forth in the bill of particulars does not include the complete terms. Essential terms remained therefore for later determination. (See Arnold v. Schmeidler, 144 App. Div. 420; House v. Hornburg, 267 App. Div. 557.) (Appeal from an order denying defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiffs' complaint.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Vaughan, Kimball and Wheeler, JJ.