Case Name: State ex rel. Garber v. Circuit Court of Koscuisko County et al.
Court: Supreme Court of Indiana
Jurisdiction: Indiana
Decision Date: 1960-11-22
Citations: 241 Ind. 133
Docket Number: No. 29,953
Parties: State ex rel. Garber v. Circuit Court of Koscuisko County et al.
Judges: Arterburn, Achor, Bobbitt and Landis, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Indiana Reports
Volume: 241
Pages: 133–135

Head Matter:
State ex rel. Garber v. Circuit Court of Koscuisko County et al.
[No. 29,953.
Filed November 22, 1960.]
Solly K. Frankenstein and Richard Ver Wiebe, both of Fort Wayne, for relator.
Seth E. Rowdabaugh, pro se.

Opinion:
Jackson, C. J.
This is an original action on a petition for writ of mandamus and prohibition against the Kosciusko Circuit Court of Kosciusko County, Indiana, and Seth E. Rowdabaugh, regular judge thereof. Relator avers that on the 4th day of May 1960, in cause No. 5470 pending in the Kosciusko Circuit Court entitled State of Indiana v. Robert F. Garber, there was filed on behalf of such named defendant, an affidavit for a change of venue from the judge of said court on account of the bias and prejudice of said judge against said defendant.
That on that date the respondent judge overruled defendants affidavit for change of venue from the judge and set the cause for arraignment on May 25, 1960.
On May 14, 1960, an alternative writ of mandate and prohibition was issued by this court, ordering the respondent to grant the change of venue filed by the defendant in cause No. 5470, and further ordering the respondent to refrain from proceeding further or exercising jurisdiction in said cause or to show cause on or before June 3, 1960, why such writ should not be made permanent.
Respondent filed return to such writ on June 2, 1960, showing that on May 25, 1960, defendant's motion and affidavit for change of judge was resubmitted, said motion granted and a panel submitted for striking to select a special judge in said cause.
It now appearing that the remedy sought by the writ has been granted, and that the issue presented by this proceeding is now moot, the alternative writ heretofore issued is now dissolved and a permanent writ denied.
Arterburn, Achor, Bobbitt and Landis, JJ., concur.
Note. — Reported in 170 N. E. 2d 370.