Case Name: James HERRON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2010-04-20
Citations: 308 S.W.3d 308
Docket Number: No. ED 93156
Parties: James HERRON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 308
Pages: 308–308

Head Matter:
James HERRON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 93156.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
April 20, 2010.
Mark A. Grothoff, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, John W. Grantham, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
James Herron ("Movant") appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 29.15 following an evidentiary hearing. Movant contends that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion for post-conviction relief.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).