Case Name: ARKANSAS WAREHOUSE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. SAINT-GOBAIN CERAMICS & PLASTICS, INC., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-06-15
Citations: 691 F. App'x 280
Docket Number: No. 16-4218
Parties: ARKANSAS WAREHOUSE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. SAINT-GOBAIN CERAMICS & PLASTICS, INC., Defendant-Appellee
Judges: Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 691
Pages: 280–281

Head Matter:
ARKANSAS WAREHOUSE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. SAINT-GOBAIN CERAMICS & PLASTICS, INC., Defendant-Appellee
No. 16-4218
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: June 12, 2017
Filed: June 15, 2017
Joseph F. Gilker, Gilker & Jones, Moun-tainburg, AR, for Plaintiff-Appellant
Stephen Neal Joiner, Byron Jansen Walker, Rose Law Firm, Little Rock, AR, for Defendant-Appellee
Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this diversity action for unjust enrichment, Arkansas Warehouse, Inc. appeals the district court's grant of for summary judgment to defendant-appellee Saint-Go-bain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc.
After careful de novo review, see Johnson v. Blaukat, 453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th Cir. 2006), we conclude that the district court's disposition of the cross-motions for summary judgment was appropriate for the reasons stated its opinion and order. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable P.K. Holmes, III, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas.