Case Name: Billy G. ASEMANI, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Frank B. BISHOP, Warden, WCI, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-11-30
Citations: 490 F. App'x 607
Docket Number: No. 12-7288
Parties: Billy G. ASEMANI, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Frank B. BISHOP, Warden, WCI, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 490
Pages: 607–608

Head Matter:
Billy G. ASEMANI, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Frank B. BISHOP, Warden, WCI, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 12-7288.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 20, 2012.
Decided: Nov. 30, 2012.
Billy G. Asemani, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Billy G. Asemani appeals the district court's order construing his self-styled application for habeas relief as a petition for writ of mandamus and dismissing it without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Asemani v. Bishop, No. 1:12-cv-02075-RDB (D.Md. July 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and ar gument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.