Case Name: Mortimer H. Coleman, Respondent, v. Ted's Auto Sales, Inc., et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1962-12-06
Citations: 12 N.Y.2d 833
Docket Number: 
Parties: Mortimer H. Coleman, Respondent, v. Ted’s Auto Sales, Inc., et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 12
Pages: 833–834

Head Matter:
Mortimer H. Coleman, Respondent, v. Ted’s Auto Sales, Inc., et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
Submitted December 3, 1962;
decided December 6, 1962.
George M. Aronwald and Irving 1. Brandwein for motion.
Nathan G'ooper, Paul C. Murstein and Chester Bordean opposed.

Opinion:
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the denial of the cross motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint, dismissed for nonfinality; otherwise, motion denied, with $10 costs and necessary printing disbursements.