Case Name: Andrew Gow, Jr., Respondent, v. Harold Egbert et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1946-06-26
Citations: 270 A.D. 1045
Docket Number: 
Parties: Andrew Gow, Jr., Respondent, v. Harold Egbert et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 270
Pages: 1045–1045

Head Matter:
Andrew Gow, Jr., Respondent, v. Harold Egbert et al., Appellants.

Opinion:
In an action for a partnership dissolution and accounting, and for other relief, interlocutory judgment' entered in favor of plaintiff reversed on the facts, without costs, and a new trial granted upon condition that within five days after the entry of an order hereon appellants file a surety company undertaking in the sum of $5,000, conditioned to the effect that appellants will not dispose of any of the assets, fixtures, accounts, stock, good will or property, either real or personal, of Staten Island Welding Service, except as may be necessary for the continued conduct of the business, and will obey all orders of the court in the action and perform all things which the judgment therein requires them to perform. Upon failure to comply with the condition of this reversal, the judgment is unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondent. In the event of and for the purposes of a new trial, all findings of fact are reversed and the conclusions of law are disapproved. The appeal from the decision, findings of fact, and order is dismissed, without costs. Upon this record it may not be held that the trial justice's refusal to grant the application for further adjournment of the trial was an abuse of discretion. In view of the fact, however, that' a trial of the main issue, as to the existence of a partnership, may finally dispose- of the litigation, a new trial is granted in the interests of justice. Lewis, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Nolan, JJ., concur.