Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Harold WEAVER, Appellant; Harold WEAVER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1994-05-03
Citations: 874 S.W.2d 561
Docket Number: Nos. 62193 and 63635
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Harold WEAVER, Appellant. Harold WEAVER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before SIMON, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and CRANDALL, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 874
Pages: 561–562

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Harold WEAVER, Appellant. Harold WEAVER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 62193 and 63635.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
May 3, 1994.
John Klosterman, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Michael J. Spillane, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before SIMON, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and CRANDALL, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant appeals his convictions by a jury of attempted forcible rape, § 566.030 R.S.Mo. 1986, one count of first degree assault, § 565.050 R.S.Mo.1986, and one count of armed criminal action, § 571.015 R.S.Mo. 1986.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).
Appellant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for ineffective assistance of trial counsel.
The judgment of the motion court denying appellant's Rule 29.15 motion is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).