Case Name: Tom HEANEY, Plaintiff-Appellant v. PRUDENTIAL REAL ESTATE AFFILIATES, INC.; Prudential Insurance Company of America; GBS Properties LLC, doing business as Prudential Gardner Realtors, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-07-10
Citations: 328 F. App'x 314
Docket Number: No. 08-30714
Parties: Tom HEANEY, Plaintiff-Appellant v. PRUDENTIAL REAL ESTATE AFFILIATES, INC.; Prudential Insurance Company of America; GBS Properties LLC, doing business as Prudential Gardner Realtors, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 328
Pages: 314–314

Head Matter:
Tom HEANEY, Plaintiff-Appellant v. PRUDENTIAL REAL ESTATE AFFILIATES, INC.; Prudential Insurance Company of America; GBS Properties LLC, doing business as Prudential Gardner Realtors, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 08-30714.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
July 10, 2009.
Jack Anthony Ricci, Ricci & Giepert, New Orleans, LA, for Defendants-Appel-lees.
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED for essentially the reasons provided in its order granting summary judgment. See 5th Cir. R. 47.6.
Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
. We are satisfied that the plaintiff exhausted his administrative remedies under the Sar-banes Oxley Act and thus that the district court had jurisdiction over the matter. See Heaney v. GBS Properties LLC d/b/a Prudential Gardner Real., ARB Case No. 05-039, 2005 WL 4888985 (ARB May 19, 2005).