Case Name: UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee v. UNIVERSAL REMOTE CONTROL, INC., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-10-17
Citations: 669 F. App'x 575
Docket Number: 2015-1410, 2015-1561, 2016-1055
Parties: UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee v. UNIVERSAL REMOTE CONTROL, INC., Defendant-Appellant
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 669
Pages: 575–576

Head Matter:
UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee v. UNIVERSAL REMOTE CONTROL, INC., Defendant-Appellant
2015-1410, 2015-1561, 2016-1055
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
October 17, 2016
Gregory A. Castanias, Jones Day, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by Mark A. Finkelstein, Jaclyn Stahl, Irvine, CA; Sheryl Hoke Love, Thomas R. Goots, David B. Cochran, Cleveland, OH.
Peter H. Kang, Sidley Austin LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for defendant-appellant. Also represented by Constantine L. Trela, Jr., Chicago, IL; Theodore Whitley Chandler, Los Angeles, CA; Anna Mayergoyz Weinberg, Washington, DC; Teague I. Do-nahey, Holland & Hart LLP, Boise, ID; Douglas A. Miro, Ostrolenk Faber LLP, New York, NY.

Opinion:
JUDGMENT
Per Curiam (Prost, Chief Judge, Reyna and Chen, Circuit Judges).
This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.