Case Name: In the Matter of the Application of Isidore J. MAGASIS for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Isidore J. Magasis, Appellant; In the Matter of the Application of Nettie COHEN for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Nettie Cohen, Appellant; In the Matter of the Application of Bertha ZIMBERG for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Bertha Zimberg, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1945-11-15
Citations: 151 F.2d 802
Docket Number: Nos. 8983-8985
Parties: In the Matter of the Application of Isidore J. MAGASIS for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Isidore J. Magasis, Appellant. In the Matter of the Application of Nettie COHEN for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Nettie Cohen, Appellant. In the Matter of the Application of Bertha ZIMBERG for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Bertha Zimberg, Appellant.
Judges: Before MARIS, GOODRICH, and O’CONNELL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 151
Pages: 802–802

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Application of Isidore J. MAGASIS for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Isidore J. Magasis, Appellant. In the Matter of the Application of Nettie COHEN for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Nettie Cohen, Appellant. In the Matter of the Application of Bertha ZIMBERG for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Bertha Zimberg, Appellant.
Nos. 8983-8985.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Argued Nov. 9, 1945.
Decided Nov. 15, 1945.
Meyer Kreeger, of New York City (George M. Eichler, of Jersey City, N. J., on the brief), for appellants.
Grover C. Richman, Jr., of Camden, N. J. (Edgar H. Rossbach, U. S. Atty., of Newark, N. J., on the brief), for appellee.
Before MARIS, GOODRICH, and O’CONNELL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In these three cases the district court denied the petitioners' applications for writs of habeas corpus. The applications allege facts similar to those disclosed in the case of United States ex rel. Samuels v. Pearson, Post Commanding Officer, Fort Dix, New Jersey, 3 Cir., 151 F.2d 801. For the reasons given in our opinion in that case it is clear that the facts alleged in these applications entitle the petitioners to the issuance of writs and hearings thereon.
Accordingly in each case the order of the district court is reversed and the cause is remanded to that court with directions to award a writ of habeas corpus as prayed for.