Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesus DIAZ-SANCHEZ, a/k/a Jaime Rodriguez Anaya and Jaime R. Anaya, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-07-06
Citations: 328 F. App'x 515
Docket Number: No. 07-50574
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jesus DIAZ-SANCHEZ, a/k/a Jaime Rodriguez Anaya and Jaime R. Anaya, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: PAEZ, TALLMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 328
Pages: 515–515

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jesus DIAZ-SANCHEZ, a/k/a Jaime Rodriguez Anaya and Jaime R. Anaya, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 07-50574.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 16, 2009.
Filed July 6, 2009.
Michael J. Raphael, Esq., Rodin Rooya-ni, Esq., USLA-Office of the U.S. Attorney Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Gerald C. Salseda, FPDCA-Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: PAEZ, TALLMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Jesus Diaz-Sanchez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 63-month sentence for being an alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Diaz-Sanchez's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.