Case Name: Frederick BOYER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-01-22
Citations: 70 S.W.3d 551
Docket Number: No. ED 78988
Parties: Frederick BOYER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., P.J., and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 70
Pages: 551–551

Head Matter:
Frederick BOYER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 78988.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Jan. 22, 2002.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 13, 2002.
Application for Transfer Denied April 23, 2002.
■ Mary S. Choi, Asst. Public Defender, St.. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Evan J. Buchheim, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., P.J., and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Frederick Boyer appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court's judgment is based on findings of fact and conclusions of law that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a memorandum of law, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).