Case Name: PAGE WOVEN WIRE FENCE COMPANY, Respondent, v. D. T. BROOKS, Appellant
Court: Kansas City Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1907-10-07
Citations: 126 Mo. App. 495
Docket Number: 
Parties: PAGE WOVEN WIRE FENCE COMPANY, Respondent, v. D. T. BROOKS, Appellant.
Judges: All concur.
Reporter: Missouri Appeal Reports
Volume: 126
Pages: 495–495

Head Matter:
PAGE WOVEN WIRE FENCE COMPANY, Respondent, v. D. T. BROOKS, Appellant.
Kansas City Court of Appeals,
October 7, 1907.
APPELLATE PRACTICE: Abstract: Motions: Exceptions: Record. The record proper must show the filing and overruling of the motions and the filing of the bill of exceptions, since such matters cannot be proved by recitals in the bill.
Appeal from Bates Circuit Court. — Son. Charles A. Denton, Judge.
Affirmed.
Silvers & Silvers for appellant.
Silas W. Dooley for respondent. '

Opinion:
JOHNSON, J.
Defendant appealed from a judgment against him in the circuit court and brought the case here on a transcript of the judgment and order of appeal. Aside from the recitals in what purports to be a bill of exceptions, the abstract of the record filed by appellant fails to show the verdict and judgment, filing and overruling of motion for new trial and filing of bill of exceptions.
It has been held over and over again that such matters cannot be proved by the recitals of the bill of exceptions, but must appear from the record. [Cummings v. Eiler, 121 Mo. App. 576; Redd v. Railway, 122 Mo. App. 93; Walner v. Wade, 101 S. W. 686, 124 Mo. App. 496; St. Charles ex rel. v. Deemar, 174 Mo. 122; Williams v. Harris, 110 Mo. App. 538; Kampf v. Transit Co., 102 Mo. App. 314; Hughes v. Henderson, 95 Mo. App. 312.]
None of the errors assigned is properly before us for review and, accordingly, the judgment must be affirmed.
All concur.