Case Name: DIXON, Respondent, v. SNOOK, Appellant. MAHANNA, Appellant, v. PHILIPS, Respondent. OTIS, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1911-10
Citations: 133 N.Y.S. 1118
Docket Number: 
Parties: DIXON, Respondent, v. SNOOK, Appellant. MAHANNA, Appellant, v. PHILIPS, Respondent. OTIS, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 133
Pages: 1118–1118

Head Matter:
DIXON, Respondent, v. SNOOK, Appellant. MAHANNA, Appellant, v. PHILIPS, Respondent. OTIS, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO., Appellant.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
October, 1911.)
Actions by Charles Dixon against Cortland Snook, by Jane Mahanna against Frank Philips, and by James S. Otis against the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company.

Opinion:
No opinions. The foregoing cases, having been twice reached in their regular order upon the calendar, and twice passed, are dismissed, under general rule 39. See, also, 65 Misc. Rep. 166, 119 N. Y. Supp. 360; 131 N. Y. Supp. 1127.