Case Name: Abraham Oberstein et al., Respondents, v. Susan M. Diack, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1900-06
Citations: 32 Misc. 709
Docket Number: 
Parties: Abraham Oberstein et al., Respondents, v. Susan M. Diack, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 32
Pages: 709–710

Head Matter:
Abraham Oberstein et al., Respondents, v. Susan M. Diack, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan.
Charles N. Morgan & Son, for appellant.
Leon Sanders, for respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
From the judgment, it seems that the justice found $200 a fair charge for the services claimed to have been rendered for defendant.
The evidence does not warrant the finding, as there is no evidence of the value of the wife's interest in the policy.
From the evidence, it is not clear that the services were rendered for the defendant.
Present: Truax, P. J., Soott and Dugro, JJ.
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.