Case Name: Willie BALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1994-07-26
Citations: 884 S.W.2d 62
Docket Number: No. 65239
Parties: Willie BALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before AHRENS, P.J., and SIMON and KAROHL, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 884
Pages: 62–63

Head Matter:
Willie BALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 65239.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
July 26, 1994.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 30, 1994.
Application to Transfer Denied Oct. 25, 1994.
David C. Hemingway, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John R. Watson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before AHRENS, P.J., and SIMON and KAROHL, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.-035 motion following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no pree- edential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).