Case Name: In the Matter of the Marriage of Suzanne GANO-RIDGE, Petitioner-Appellant, and James Ivan RIDGE, Respondent-Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2007-05-30
Citations: 213 Or. App. 235
Docket Number: 150316348; A127997
Parties: In the Matter of the Marriage of Suzanne GANO-RIDGE, Petitioner-Appellant, and James Ivan RIDGE, Respondent-Respondent.
Judges: Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Brewer, Chief Judge, and Wollheim, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 213
Pages: 235–236

Head Matter:
On appellant’s petition for reconsideration filed April 4, and response to appellant’s petition for reconsideration filed April 11,
reconsideration allowed; former opinion (211 Or App 393,155 P3d 84) modified to correct mathematical error; adhered to as modified May 30, 2007
In the Matter of the Marriage of Suzanne GANO-RIDGE, Petitioner-Appellant, and James Ivan RIDGE, Respondent-Respondent.
Lane County Circuit Court
150316348; A127997
159 P3d 1292
Jeffrey E. Potter and Gardner, Honsowetz, Potter, Budge & Ford for petition.
Vanessa L. Carter for response.
Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Brewer, Chief Judge, and Wollheim, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Wife, who prevailed as appellant, see Gano-Ridge and Ridge, 211 Or App 393, 155 P3d 84 (2007), petitions for reconsideration, pointing out a mathematical error in our opinion. Wife notes that, at 211 Or App at 411 n 9, we stated the total assets awarded to wife as $334,495, which included the trial court's previous equalizing judgment of $90,495. We then included the amount of the former equalizing judgment again in the equalizing judgment of $311,520, thereby overstating by $90,495 the net property award to wife ($646,015), 211 Or App at 411, when the correct calculation of the property awarded to wife is $555,520. Wife asks the court to increase the equalizing judgment to $402,015 so that the net award to wife is $646,015. As we explained in our opinion, a just and proper award to wife requires an equalizing judgment to wife of $311,520. We accordingly correct the calculation at 211 Or App at 411 n 9 as follows:
$244,000
$311,520
$555,520
total assets awarded to wife equalizingjudgment
We similarly correct the amount stated as the net property award to wife at 211 Or App at 411 as $555,520.
Reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified to correct mathematical error; adhered to as modified.