Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesus Humberto QUINONEZ-AISPURO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-04-12
Citations: 175 F. App'x 884
Docket Number: No. 04-30535
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jesus Humberto QUINONEZ-AISPURO, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: HAWKINS, MCKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 175
Pages: 884–885

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jesus Humberto QUINONEZ-AISPURO, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 04-30535.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 5, 2006.
Decided April 12, 2006.
Judith R. Harper, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Medford, OR, for PlaintiffAppellee.
Robert M. Stone, Esq., Medford, OR, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: HAWKINS, MCKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Jesus Humberto Quinonez-Aispuro appeals from the 120-month sentence imposed after his guilty-plea conviction to distribution of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A)(viii). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
We dismiss the appeal in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2000) (stating that an appeal waiver is valid when it is entered into knowingly and voluntarily).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.