Case Name: Bordentown Banking Company v. Sparhawk, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1906-03-12
Citations: 214 Pa. 334
Docket Number: No. 2; Appeal, No. 232
Parties: Bordentown Banking Company v. Sparhawk, Appellant
Judges: Before Mitchell, C. J., Fell, Brown, Mestrezat, Potter, Elkin and Stewart, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 214
Pages: 334–335

Head Matter:
Bordentown Banking Company v. Sparhawk, Appellant
(No. 2).
Argued Jan. 12, 1906.
Appeal, No. 232, Jan. T., 1905, by defendant, from order of C. P. No. 1, Phila. Co., March T., 1905, No. 4,247, making absolute rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in case of Bordentown Bank ing Company v. John Sparhawk, Jr.
Before Mitchell, C. J., Fell, Brown, Mestrezat, Potter, Elkin and Stewart, JJ.
Affirmed.
March 12, 1906:

Opinion:
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Stewart,
The cause of action here is the same as in Bordentown Banking Co. v. Restein, ante, p. 331, just decided, and the affidavit of defense is precisely the same. For reasons stated in that case, this judgment is affirmed.