Case Name: Oscar F. RANDLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-05-02
Citations: 24 S.W.3d 210
Docket Number: No. ED 76732
Parties: Oscar F. RANDLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J. and PAUL J. SIMON and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 24
Pages: 210–211

Head Matter:
Oscar F. RANDLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 76732.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
May 2, 2000.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 5, 2000.
Application for Transfer Denied Aug. 29, 2000.
Dave Hemingway, Asst. Sp. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Andrea L. Mazza, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J. and PAUL J. SIMON and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant Oscar Randle appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without a hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).