Case Name: Abiodun M. SODIPO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CAYMAS SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-11-28
Citations: 208 F. App'x 524
Docket Number: No. 06-16951
Parties: Abiodun M. SODIPO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CAYMAS SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before: LEAVY, GOULD and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 208
Pages: 524–524

Head Matter:
This case was not selected for publication in the Federal Reporter NOT FOR PUBLICATION
Abiodun M. SODIPO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CAYMAS SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 06-16951.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 27, 2006.
Filed Nov. 28, 2006.
Abiodun M. Sodipo, San Ramon, CA, pro se.
Elaine Wang, Esq., Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before: LEAVY, GOULD and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
This appeal from the district court's order denying appellant's motion for preliminary injunction comes to us for review under Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we summarily affirm upon review of appellant's opening brief and response to the November 13, 2006 order to show cause. See Ninth Circuit Rule 3-6.
We express no view on the merits of the complaint. Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying preliminary injunctive relief. See Gregorio T. v. Wilson, 59 F.3d 1002, 1004-05 (9th Cir.1995). The record before us shows that the court did not rely on an erroneous legal premise or abuse its discretion in concluding that appellant had failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits and in denying preliminary injunctive relief. See id. The court's factual findings and application of legal standards are not clearly erroneous. See id. Accordingly, the court's order denying the preliminary injunction is affirmed. All pending motions are denied as moot.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.