Case Name: O'MALLAY v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1912-06-26
Citations: 148 S.W. 1094
Docket Number: 
Parties: O’MALLAY v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 148
Pages: 1094–1094

Head Matter:
O’MALLAY v. STATE.
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
June 26, 1912.)
Criminal Raw (§ 1097 ) —Appeal — Statement op Pacts.
Objections that the conviction was not sustained by sufficient evidence, and that the court permitted the state to use defendant’s wife as a witness against him, could not be reviewed, in the absence of a statement of facts.
[Ed. Note. — Por other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2862, 2864, 2926, 2934, 2938, 2939, 2941, 2942, 2947; Dec. Dig. § 1097. ]
Appeal from Criminal 'District Court, Dallas County; Robt. B. Seay, Judge.
John O’Mallay was convicted of burglary, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
For other cases see same topic and section NUMBER in Dec. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key No. Series & Rep’r Indexes

Opinion:
DAVIDSON, P-. J.
Appellant was convicted of burglary; his punishment being assessed at two years' confinement in the penitentiary.
The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. The first ground of the motion for new trial complains of the conviction for want of sufficient evidence to justify it. There is no statement of facts in the record. The second ground of the motion for new trial says the court committed error calculated to injure the rights of appellant in permitting the state to use as a witness his wife against him, and in permitting her to testify to material facts against the appellant, as shown by bill of exceptions No. 1. The bill of exceptions, if reserved, is not in the record; therefore we cannot review the question.
The judgment is affirmed.