Case Name: Chong Zeilnhofer et al., Respondents, v. Jolene Marcinko et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1997-12-31
Citations: 245 A.D.2d 1070
Docket Number: 
Parties: Chong Zeilnhofer et al., Respondents, v Jolene Marcinko et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 245
Pages: 1070–1070

Head Matter:
Chong Zeilnhofer et al., Respondents, v Jolene Marcinko et al., Appellants.
[666 NYS2d 77]

Opinion:
—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Defendants failed to make a prima facie showing that Chong Zeilnhofer (plaintiff) did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see, DePetres v Kaiser, 244 AD2d 851; Nigro v Penree, 238 AD2d 908; Thomas v Hulslander, 233 AD2d 567). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Jefferson County, Gilbert, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Wisner, Callahan and Fallon, JJ. '