Case Name: S. MARTIN JACOBSEN, RESPONDENT, v. PETER A. PETERSON, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1918-11-26
Citations: 92 N.J.L. 631
Docket Number: 
Parties: S. MARTIN JACOBSEN, RESPONDENT, v. PETER A. PETERSON, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 92
Pages: 631–632

Head Matter:
S. MARTIN JACOBSEN, RESPONDENT, v. PETER A. PETERSON, APPELLANT.
Argued November 22, 1918
Decided November 26, 1918.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 91 N. J. L. 404.
For the respondent, Leo Goldberg er and S. Martin Jacobsen.
Por the appellant, Peter A. Peterson.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.
• For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Bergen, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.