Case Name: Cecelia W. PEOPLES and Ernest A. Robinson, Jr. v. Thomas H. TUCK
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 2017-08-17
Citations: 802 S.E.2d 730
Docket Number: No. 423P16
Parties: Cecelia W. PEOPLES and Ernest A. Robinson, Jr.
v.
Thomas H. TUCK
Judges: 
Reporter: South Eastern Reporter 2d
Volume: 802
Pages: 730–731

Head Matter:
Cecelia W. PEOPLES and Ernest A. Robinson, Jr.
v.
Thomas H. TUCK
No. 423P16
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
August 17, 2017
Donald J. Dunn, Attorney at Law, Goldsboro, Molly M. Schertzinger, Attorney at Law, Jacksonville, Jonathan M. Smith, Attorney at Law, Goldsboro, for Peoples, Cecelia W., et al.
David O. Lewis, Attorney at Law, Durham, for Tuck, Thomas H.
ORDER

Opinion:
Defendant's petition for discretionary review is allowed for the limited purpose of remanding to the Court of Appeals to reconsider its holding in light of United Community Bank (G.A.) v. Wolfe , - N.C. -, 799 S.E.2d 269 (2017). See United Cmty. Bank , - N.C. at -, 799 S.E.2d at 272 (recognizing that, under N.C.G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56(e), a party may not rest upon an affidavit containing merely "conclusory statement[s] without any supporting facts" to create a genuine issue of material fact).:
"Spec Order by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of August 2017."