Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Daryle Manigault, Also Known as Daryle Manigold, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2002-09-23
Citations: 297 A.D.2d 754
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Daryle Manigault, Also Known as Daryle Manigold, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 297
Pages: 754–754

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Daryle Manigault, Also Known as Daryle Manigold, Appellant.
[747 NYS2d 787]

Opinion:
The defendant has not preserved for appellate review his contention that the trial court's examination of witnesses during the trial, and comments during the prosecutor's summation, denied him a fair trial (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Charleston, 56 NY2d 886; People v Gonzalez, 183 AD2d 783). In any event, the trial court's questioning was proper (cf. People v Yut Wai Tom, 53 NY2d 44, 45).
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J.P., Schmidt, Townes and Cozier, JJ., concur.