Case Name: Otis WALLACE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1997-11-11
Citations: 955 S.W.2d 794
Docket Number: No. 71726
Parties: Otis WALLACE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GRIMM, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 955
Pages: 794–795

Head Matter:
Otis WALLACE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 71726.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Nov. 11, 1997.
Raymund J. Gapelovitch, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before GRIMM, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Otis Wallace, appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).