Case Name: Zenaida PEREZ, Appellant, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1998-04-01
Citations: 709 So. 2d 591
Docket Number: No. 97-3192
Parties: Zenaida PEREZ, Appellant, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and GREEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 709
Pages: 591–592

Head Matter:
Zenaida PEREZ, Appellant, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.
No. 97-3192.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 1, 1998.
Rehearing Denied June 3, 1998.
Marks and Truppman, Miami, and Harold R. Elite Truppman; Lauri Waldman Ross, Miami, for appellant.
Angones, Hunter, McClure, Lynch & Williams and Christopher J. Lynch, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and GREEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Upon the sole condition that the insured file the sworn proof of loss required by the policy in support of her claim for additional insured damages, the order below denying appraisal is reversed on the authority of All state Ins. Co. v. Sierra, 705 So.2d 119 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), and the cause is remanded with directions to order appraisal.
SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GREEN, J., concur.
COPE, J., concurs in part and dissents in part.