Case Name: Allan Lamont PETTY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2018-02-27
Citations: 543 S.W.3d 75
Docket Number: WD 80111
Parties: Allan Lamont PETTY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 543
Pages: 75–75

Head Matter:
Allan Lamont PETTY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
WD 80111
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Filed: February 27, 2018
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 22, 2018
Maleaner R. Harvey, St. Louis for appellant.
Christine K. Lesicko, Jefferson City for respondent.
Before Division Three: Lisa White Hardwick, P.J., and Victor C. Howard and Alok Ahuja, JJ.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Boone County, Appellant Allen Petty was convicted of one count of statutory rape in the first degree, in violation of § 566.032, RSMo, for having sexual intercourse with a twelve-year-old female victim in April 2013. After we affirmed Petty's conviction on direct appeal, he filed a motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29.15, and his appointed counsel filed an amended motion. The circuit court denied Petty's motion following an evidentiary hearing.
Petty appeals. He argues that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to request a mistrial when the jury indicated that it was unable to reach a verdict after two-and-a-half hours of deliberation, and that his appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to argue that the circuit court erroneously denied a mistrial after one of the jurors was observed crying in reaction to a recording of the child-victim's 911 call.
We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).