Case Name: In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Richard BRADLEY. Richard J. Bradley, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-10-23
Citations: 383 S.W.3d 67
Docket Number: No. ED 97743
Parties: In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Richard BRADLEY. Richard J. Bradley, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before FATHIANNE FNAUP CRANE, P.J., MARY F. HOFF, and LISA VAN AMBURG, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 383
Pages: 67–68

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Richard BRADLEY. Richard J. Bradley, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 97743.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Oct. 23, 2012.
Erika R. Eliason, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Chris Foster, Attorney General, Timothy A. Blackwell, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before FATHIANNE FNAUP CRANE, P.J., MARY F. HOFF, and LISA VAN AMBURG, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Richard Bradley, appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him to be a sexually violent predator, pursuant to sections 632.480 et seq. RSMo (Cum.Supp.2009). The evidence in support of the jury verdict is not insufficient. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).