Case Name: WASHINGTON STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, Petitioner-Appellee, v. John M. KEEFE, Esq., Respondent-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-06-11
Citations: 234 F. App'x 510
Docket Number: No. 05-36217
Parties: WASHINGTON STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, Petitioner-Appellee, v. John M. KEEFE, Esq., Respondent-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 234
Pages: 510–511

Head Matter:
WASHINGTON STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, Petitioner-Appellee, v. John M. KEEFE, Esq., Respondent-Appellant.
No. 05-36217.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 5, 2007 .
Filed June 11, 2007.
Marsha A. Matsumoto, Esq., Washington State Bar Association, Seattle, CA, for Petitioner-Appellee.
John M. Keefe, Esq., South Pasadena, CA, pro se.
Before: LEAVY, RYMER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
John M. Keefe, Esq., appeals pro se from the district court's order remanding to state court the disciplinary and disability proceedings brought against him by the Washington State Bar Association. We dismiss the appeal.
We lack jurisdiction to review the district court's remand order because that order was based on its determination, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d); United Investors Life Ins. Co. v. Waddell & Reed Inc., 360 F.3d 960, 963 (9th Cir.2004); see also Seedman v. U.S. Dist. Court for Cent. Dist. of California, 837 F.2d 413, 414 (9th Cir.1988) (per cu-riam) (prohibition on the review of remand orders extends to the district court's own ability to entertain a motion for reconsideration).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provid ed by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.