Case Name: William Douglas HAMPTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX PETERSBURG; Eric Wilson, Warden; Maurice Danzey, Associate Warden; L. Humphrey, Recreation Supervisor; R. Spears, Education Supervisor; R. Hutchings, Associate Warden; D. DiCocco, Health Services Administrator; M. Reynolds, Director of Psychology; P. Hilletework, Mid-Level Practitioner; S. Harris, Legal Administrator; A. Lewis, Associate Warden; K. Kiddy, Unit A/B Manager, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-04-28
Citations: 687 F. App'x 288
Docket Number: No. 17-6144
Parties: William Douglas HAMPTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX PETERSBURG; Eric Wilson, Warden; Maurice Danzey, Associate Warden; L. Humphrey, Recreation Supervisor; R. Spears, Education Supervisor; R. Hutchings, Associate Warden; D. DiCocco, Health Services Administrator; M. Reynolds, Director of Psychology; P. Hilletework, Mid-Level Practitioner; S. Harris, Legal Administrator; A. Lewis, Associate Warden; K. Kiddy, Unit A/B Manager, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 687
Pages: 288–289

Head Matter:
William Douglas HAMPTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX PETERSBURG; Eric Wilson, Warden; Maurice Danzey, Associate Warden; L. Humphrey, Recreation Supervisor; R. Spears, Education Supervisor; R. Hutchings, Associate Warden; D. DiCocco, Health Services Administrator; M. Reynolds, Director of Psychology; P. Hilletework, Mid-Level Practitioner; S. Harris, Legal Administrator; A. Lewis, Associate Warden; K. Kiddy, Unit A/B Manager, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 17-6144
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 25, 2017
Decided: April 28, 2017
William Douglas Hampton, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
William Douglas Hampton, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order dismissing his declaratory judgment action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2012) for failure to state a claim. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Hampton's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, Hampton has for-' feited appellate review of the court's order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we deny Hampton's motion for declaratory judgment and affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED