Case Name: Malcolm, Respondent, v. Manhattan Ry. Co. et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1891-10-16
Citations: 15 N.Y.S. 973
Docket Number: 
Parties: Malcolm, Respondent, v. Manhattan Ry. Co. et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 15
Pages: 973–973

Head Matter:
Malcolm, Respondent, v. Manhattan Ry. Co. et al., Appellants.
(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.
October 16, 1891.)
Appeal from special term, New York county.
Action by James F. Malcolm against the Manhattan Railway Company and the New York Elevated Railroad Company for injuries to plaintiff’s property. There was judgment for plaintiff granting an injunction nisi, and defendants appeal.
Argued before Van Brunt, P. J., and Daniels and Ingraham, JJ.
Davies, Short & Townsend, (Julian T. Davies and Joseph E. Lord, of counsel,) for appellants. Peckham & Tyler, (E. W. Tyler, of counsel,) for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
All the questions of any moment involved in this appeal have already been frequently passed upon by this court, and it is not necessary now to rediscuss them. Upon an examination of the evidence in respect to the amount of damages awarded, no injustice to the defendants appears to have been done. The theory which is attempted to be asserted, that the defendants are entitled to be credited witli benefits, has been heretofore sufficiently discussed, so as not to need further elaboration. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.