Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rafael CONTRERAS-AGUILAR, aka Rafael Aguilar Contreras, Rafael Contreras, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-08-04
Citations: 140 F. App'x 741
Docket Number: No. 04-50123; D.C. No. CR-03-00883-SJO
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rafael CONTRERAS-AGUILAR, aka Rafael Aguilar Contreras, Rafael Contreras, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before O’SCANNLAIN, CALLAHAN and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 140
Pages: 741–741

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rafael CONTRERAS-AGUILAR, aka Rafael Aguilar Contreras, Rafael Contreras, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 04-50123.
D.C. No. CR-03-00883-SJO.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 1, 2005.
Decided Aug. 4, 2005.
Robert McGahan, USLA — Office of the U.S. Attorney Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff — Appellee.
Michael Tanaka, Esq., FPDCA — Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant — Appellant.
Before O’SCANNLAIN, CALLAHAN and BEA, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Rafael Contreras-Aguilar appeals his 51-month sentence following his guilty plea to Illegal Reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We cannot determine from the record whether the district court would have imposed a materially different sentence if it had known that the Sentencing Guidelines were advisory rather than mandatory. Therefore, under United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc) and United States v. Hermoso-Garcia, 413 F.3d 1085, 2005 WL 1579507 (9th Cir. July 7, 2005), we remand for the limited purpose of making that determination.
REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.