Case Name: Mary A. Daly, complainant-respondent, v. Ripley Watson, defendant-appellant
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1937-01-26
Citations: 121 N.J. Eq. 250
Docket Number: 
Parties: Mary A. Daly, complainant-respondent, v. Ripley Watson, defendant-appellant.
Judges: For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Cole, JJ. 14.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 121
Pages: 250–250

Head Matter:
Mary A. Daly, complainant-respondent, v. Ripley Watson, defendant-appellant.
[Submitted October term, 1936.
Decided January 26th, 1937.]
Messrs. Herr & Xaufmann (Mr. Dougal Herr, Mr. William A. Xaufmann and Mr. Emerson A. Tschupp), for the defendant-appellant.
Mr. I. Edward Herrmann and Mr. Ralph W. Emerson, for the complainant-respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We have examined the proofs in this case, and they abundantly support the conclusions of the learned vice-chancellor.
The decree will be affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Cole, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.