Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Linwood Collins, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2001-06-05
Citations: 96 N.Y.2d 837
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Linwood Collins, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 96
Pages: 837–838

Head Matter:
[754 NE2d 192, 729 NYS2d 433]
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Linwood Collins, Appellant.
Argued May 1, 2001;
decided June 5, 2001
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Rivkin, Radler & Kremer, L. L. P., Uniondale (Evan H. Krinick and Michael P. Versichelli of counsel), for appellant.
Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney of New York County, New York City (Vincent Rivellese and Mark Dwyer of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendant appeals his conviction of conspiracy in the first degree arising from his alleged participation in a large-scale drug operation. On appeal he argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a mistrial after a "stipulation" was read to the jury stating that defendant was incarcerated from February 19, 1992 to the date of trial about two and a half years later. On this record we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion as a matter of law by denying the motion for a mistrial (see, People v Robinson, 93 NY2d 986, 987-988). Defendant's arguments with respect to the denial of his motion for severance and the Allen charge (Allen v United States, 164 US 492) are without merit. His remaining arguments are unpreserved.
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley, Rosenblatt and Graffeo concur.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.