Case Name: Allen WILKES, dba S.A.W. Construction, Respondent on Review, v. Dennis ZURLINDEN and Sharie Zurlinden, husband and wife, Petitioners on Review; Allen WILKES and Shirley Wilkes, dba S.A.W. Construction, Petitioners, v. CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS BOARD, Dennis Zurlinden and Sharie Zurlinden, Respondents
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1997-07-24
Citations: 325 Or. 489
Docket Number: CC 93-3620-L-3 and Agency No. 17988-101; CA A91278 (Control), A91800; SC S44075
Parties: Allen WILKES, dba S.A.W. Construction, Respondent on Review, v. Dennis ZURLINDEN and Sharie Zurlinden, husband and wife, Petitioners on Review. Allen WILKES and Shirley Wilkes, dba S.A.W. Construction, Petitioners, v. CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS BOARD, Dennis Zurlinden and Sharie Zurlinden, Respondents.
Judges: Before Carson, Chief Justice, and Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Fadeley, Graber, and Durham, Justices.
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 325
Pages: 489–490

Head Matter:
On petition for review filed March 14, petition for review allowed;
decision of Court of Appeals vacated and case remanded to Court of Appeals for further consideration July 24, 1997
Allen WILKES, dba S.A.W. Construction, Respondent on Review, v. Dennis ZURLINDEN and Sharie Zurlinden, husband and wife, Petitioners on Review. Allen WILKES and Shirley Wilkes, dba S.A.W. Construction, Petitioners, v. CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS BOARD, Dennis Zurlinden and Sharie Zurlinden, Respondents.
(CC 93-3620-L-3 and Agency No. 17988-101; CA A91278 (Control), A91800; SC S44075)
940 P2d 518
John R. Huttl, of Frohnmayer, Deatherage, Pratt, Jamison & Clarke, P.C., Medford, filed the petition for petitioners on review.
No appearance contra.
Before Carson, Chief Justice, and Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Fadeley, Graber, and Durham, Justices.
Kulongoski, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in the light of Anderson v. Jensen Racing, Inc., 324 Or 570, 931 P2d 763 (1997) and Domingo v. Anderson, 325 Or 385, 938 P2d 206 (1997).