Case Name: CITY OF LONG BEACH (a Municipal Corporation), Appellant, v. MAY E. ANDERSON et al., Defendants; ERNEST V. PRATT et al., Respondents
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1934-06-06
Citations: 139 Cal. App. 789
Docket Number: Civ. No. 5101
Parties: CITY OF LONG BEACH (a Municipal Corporation), Appellant, v. MAY E. ANDERSON et al., Defendants; ERNEST V. PRATT et al., Respondents.
Judges: Pullen, P. J., and Plummer, J., concurred.
Reporter: California Appellate Reports
Volume: 139
Pages: 789–790

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 5101.
Third Appellate District.
June 6, 1934.]
CITY OF LONG BEACH (a Municipal Corporation), Appellant, v. MAY E. ANDERSON et al., Defendants; ERNEST V. PRATT et al., Respondents.
Nowland M. Reid, City Attorney, and Edmund J. Calla-way, Deputy City Attorney, for Appellant.
Louis N. Whealton and Raymond J. Kirkpatrick for Respondents.

Opinion:
THOMPSON, J.
This is -an appeal from an order refusing to retax costs. The facts are exactly the same as those which were involved in the case of City of Long Beach, a Municipal Corporation, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. May E. Anderson et al., Defendants; Edison Securities Company, a Corporation, Respondent (Civil No. 5092), ante, p. 130 [33 Pac. (2d) 875], in which an opinion of this court was this day filed, except that the expert witness fees which were allowed in this case amounted to the sum of $95.80.
Upon the .authority of that ease, the order in this case is reversed, with direction to the court to retax costs in accordance therewith.
Pullen, P. J., and Plummer, J., concurred.
A petition by respondent to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on August 2, 1934.