Case Name: PAKAS v. HOLLINGSHEAD et al.
Court: New York City Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1900-07-11
Citations: 65 N.Y.S. 663
Docket Number: 
Parties: PAKAS v. HOLLINGSHEAD et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 65
Pages: 663–663

Head Matter:
PAKAS v. HOLLINGSHEAD et al.
(City Court of New York, General Term.
July 11, 1900.)
Appeal—Findings op Fact—Review.
On appeal a verdict in favor of plaintiff will not be disturbed, where the issues were submitted to the jury on instructions requested by defendant.
Appeal from trial term.
Action by Solomon J. Pakas against William R. Hollingshead and another. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, and from an order, denying a motion for a new trial, defendants appeal.
Affirmed.
Argued before CORLAR, SCHUCHMAR, and HASCALL, JJ.
Spiegelberg & Wise, for appellants.
Max D. Steuer, for respondent.

Opinion:
CORLAR, J.
The action was one' upon contract for the purchase and delivery of certain goods which the defendants were requested to furnish to the plaintiff. The trial justice, in Ms charge to the jury, distinctly submitted to them each and every one of the 14 requests by the defendants, in the precise language requested, in addition to the general question that they were to determine under the contract,—whether the plaintiff was entitled to have delivered to him a distinct .article,—as to which testimony had been adduced upon the trial; and there were no exceptions by the defendants to any portion of the charge. There was no refusal, and therefore no exception to a refusal. The jury, after their deliberations, reached the conclusion that the plaintiff was entitled to recover. There was no dispute as to the amount, if the jury found for the plaintiff.-
We are not inclined to disturb this finding, and the judgment and order appealed from must be affirmed, with costs. All concur.