Case Name: William MEYER, Plaintiff/Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. Monica BIBLE, Defendant/ Appellant/Cross-Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1993-11-30
Citations: 865 S.W.2d 448
Docket Number: Nos. 63094, 63119
Parties: William MEYER, Plaintiff/Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. Monica BIBLE, Defendant/ Appellant/Cross-Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANE, P.J., and KAROHL and CRAHAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 865
Pages: 448–448

Head Matter:
William MEYER, Plaintiff/Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. Monica BIBLE, Defendant/ Appellant/Cross-Respondent.
Nos. 63094, 63119.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Nov. 30, 1993.
Jerome Wallach, Michael F. Dandino, The Wallach Law Firm, St. Louis, for appellant.
Cynthia S. Holmes, Clayton, for respondent.
Before CRANE, P.J., and KAROHL and CRAHAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
This is a consolidated appeal from the trial court's judgments on the parties' respective petition and counterclaim in which they charged each other with conversion of personal property taken from the apartment the parties had shared. The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).