Case Name: FLANAGAN v. METROPOLITAN ST. RY. CO.
Court: New York City Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1900-05-01
Citations: 64 N.Y.S. 379
Docket Number: 
Parties: FLANAGAN v. METROPOLITAN ST. RY. CO.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 64
Pages: 379–379

Head Matter:
FLANAGAN v. METROPOLITAN ST. RY. CO.
(City Court of New York,
General Term.
May 1, 1900.)
Street Cars—Car Starting without Warning—Injury to Passenger.
Where defendant’s street ear was at a standstill, and several passengers were getting off, and plaintiff was just alighting, when the conductor, without warning, started the car, and plaintiff was thrown to the ground, and injured, the defendant was liable for -the injuries.
Appeal from trial term.
Action by Mary Flanagan against the Metropolitan Street-Railway Company. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, and an order denying a new trial, defendant appeals.
Affirmed.
Argued before FITZSIMONS, C. J., and O’DWYER and CON-LAN, JJ. *
H. A. Robinson, for appellant.
P. M. Herzog, for respondent.

Opinion:
FITZSIMONS, C. J.
We think that the evidence clearly proves tho t plaintiff was injured through the gross carelessness of defendant's conductor. While the car was at a standstill, and plaintiff in the. act of alighting therefrom, and before she was able to do so, and without warning, he started the car, threw plaintiff to the ground, spraining and disfiguring her wrist, and breaking the radius bone in her arm. These injuries were dangerous, painful, and perhaps the evil effects thereof may be permanent. She was without fault. She had the right to leave the car at the place in question, and, as it was at a full stop, and seAreraI passengers were getting off, she had the right to believe and assume that she would be allowed a reasonably safe opportunity to alight, which right was not accorded her. The verdict was not excessive, as testified to. She was seriously injured, and may always suffer deformity and pain because of the negligent act of defendant's servant. Under the circumstances we think the verdict was just, reasonable, and proper, and it must be affirmed, with costs. All concur.