Case Name: Shanker S. AGARWAL and Pushpa Agarwal, Appellants, v. BANK OF FLORIDA IN SOUTH FLORIDA, Manuel Olazabal and Jose I. Caballero, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1984-02-01
Citations: 444 So. 2d 572
Docket Number: No. 83-116
Parties: Shanker S. AGARWAL and Pushpa Agarwal, Appellants, v. BANK OF FLORIDA IN SOUTH FLORIDA, Manuel Olazabal and Jose I. Caballero, Appellees.
Judges: ANSTEAD, C.J., and BERANEK and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 444
Pages: 572–572

Head Matter:
Shanker S. AGARWAL and Pushpa Agarwal, Appellants, v. BANK OF FLORIDA IN SOUTH FLORIDA, Manuel Olazabal and Jose I. Caballero, Appellees.
No. 83-116.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb. 1, 1984.
Robert A. Plafsky of Ruden, Barnett, McClosky, Schuster & Russell, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.
Karen B. Bernstein of Blank, Rome, Co-misky & McCauley, Miami, for appellee Bank of Florida in South Florida.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
REVERSED. Upon review of the record we conclude that an issue of material fact does exist as to the appellee bank's alleged responsibility for the appellants' inability to timely meet their obligations under the mortgage instrument sued upon. Accordingly, the entry of summary judgment was error.
ANSTEAD, C.J., and BERANEK and WALDEN, JJ., concur.