Case Name: Garland, Appellant, v. Gordon
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1929-01-07
Citations: 295 Pa. 99
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 91
Parties: Garland, Appellant, v. Gordon.
Judges: Before Moschzisker, C. J., Frazer, Walling, Simpson, Kephart, Sadler and Schaffer, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 295
Pages: 99–100

Head Matter:
Garland, Appellant, v. Gordon.
January 7, 1929:
Argued December 3, 1928.
Before Moschzisker, C. J., Frazer, Walling, Simpson, Kephart, Sadler and Schaffer, JJ.
W. A. Griffith, of Griffith, Truxall & Pruger, for appellant.
George H. Calvert, of Galvert, Thompson & Berger and Robert J. Dodds, of Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay, for appellee, were not heard.

Opinion:
Per Curiam,
In its opinion granting a new trial, the court below stated: "We have reviewed and carefully considered all evidence and are of opinion that a just disposition of the case requires that it be retried." In Fertax Co. v. Spiegelman, 292 Pa. 139, 140, we very recently said that, where a trial court states in its opinion that "the interests of right and justice require that the case shall be retried......we do not interfere on appeal"; that authority rules this case.
The order appealed from is affirmed.