Case Name: Amar GREEN-BEY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2019-06-11
Citations: 576 S.W.3d 340
Docket Number: No. ED 106523
Parties: Amar GREEN-BEY, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Mary K. Hoff, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 576
Pages: 340–340

Head Matter:
Amar GREEN-BEY, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 106523
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
FILED: June 11, 2019
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: Lisa M. Stroup, Public Defender, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.
ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT: Eric Schmitt, Attorney General, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.
Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Mary K. Hoff, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Amar Green-Bey ("Movant") appeals from the Judgment dismissing his untimely pro se Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm the motion court's dismissal of the underlying post-conviction case based on the untimeliness of the pro se motion.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).