Case Name: The State, ex rel. McCarty, Appellant, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellees
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1992-02-05
Citations: 62 Ohio St. 3d 428
Docket Number: No. 90-1895
Parties: The State, ex rel. McCarty, Appellant, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellees.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 62
Pages: 428–429

Head Matter:
The State, ex rel. McCarty, Appellant, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellees.
[Cite as State, ex rel. McCarty, v. Indus. Comm. (1992), 62 Ohio St.3d 428.]
(No. 90-1895
Submitted November 5, 1991
Decided February 5, 1992.)
Pencheff, King, Forman & Sullivan Co., L.P.A., and Richard J. Forman, for appellant.
Lee I. Fisher, Attorney General, Michael L. Squillace and Gerald H. Waterman, for appellee Industrial Commission.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The commission's boilerplate recitation of nonmedical disability factors does not satisfy the evidentiary requirements of Noll, supra. Pursuant to Noll we hereby affirm the judgment of the court of appeals which directed the commission to issue an order that complies with the directives set forth in that decision.
Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.