Case Name: Hallie ROBINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1990-02-06
Citations: 785 S.W.2d 724
Docket Number: No. 56292
Parties: Hallie ROBINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 785
Pages: 724–725

Head Matter:
Hallie ROBINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 56292.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Feb. 6, 1990.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 14, 1990.
Application to Transfer Denied April 17, 1990.
Beverly A. Beimdiek, St. Louis, for appellant.
William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Andrea K. Spillars, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Hallie Robinson, was convicted by a jury of second degree robbery and received fifteen years imprisonment as a prior and persistent offender. Appellant's conviction and sentence were affirmed on direct appeal. State v. Robinson, 735 S.W.2d 80 (Mo.App., E.D.1987). Appellant now appeals the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion after an evidentiary hearing claiming ineffective assistance of counsel based on counsel's alleged failure to allow appellant to testify at trial. We have reviewed this allegation and the entirety of the record on which it is based and we do not find the motion court's findings and conclusions to be clearly erroneous. Day v. State, 770 S.W.2d 692, 695 (Mo. banc 1989). We also find that an extended opinion would have no precedential value and affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).