Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Audley CASANOVA, a/k/a Robert King, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-12-27
Citations: 22 F. App'x 312
Docket Number: No. 01-6664
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Audley CASANOVA, a/k/a Robert King, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 22
Pages: 312–312

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Audley CASANOVA, a/k/a Robert King, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 01-6664.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 20, 2001.
Decided Dec. 27, 2001.
Audley Casanova, Appellant Pro Se. Clifton Thomas Barrett, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Audley Casanova seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeala-bility and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Casanova, Nos. CR-95-108; CA-99-1100-1 (M.D.N.C. filed Mar. 21, 2001, entered Mar. 23, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.