Case Name: Mary C. Ament et al., Respondents, v. Church of the Annunciation of Elma, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1998-02-04
Citations: 247 A.D.2d 843
Docket Number: 
Parties: Mary C. Ament et al., Respondents, v Church of the Annunciation of Elma, Appellant.
Judges: Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Balio and Fallon, JJ.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 247
Pages: 843–843

Head Matter:
Mary C. Ament et al., Respondents, v Church of the Annunciation of Elma, Appellant.
[668 NYS2d 140]

Opinion:
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant's motion for a change of venue pursuant to CPLR 510 (3). Defendant failed to "indicate in some detail" the testimony that the witnesses expected to be called would give and offered only vague assertions concerning the court calendars in the counties involved (Rodriguez v St. Paul's Catholic Church, 162 AD2d 1017; see, Abbadonza v Brown, 186 AD2d 1011; Schapiro & Reich v Fuchsberg, 172 AD2d 1080). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Bergin, J. — Venue.)
Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Balio and Fallon, JJ.