Case Name: Joyce BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael HALE, et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-11-20
Citations: 506 F. App'x 342
Docket Number: No. 12-5617
Parties: Joyce BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael HALE, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: BEFORE: McKEAGUE and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges; and DLOTT, District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 506
Pages: 342–342

Head Matter:
Joyce BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael HALE, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 12-5617.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Nov. 20, 2012.
BEFORE: McKEAGUE and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges; and DLOTT, District Judge.
Honorable Susan J. Dlott, Chief United States District Judge for the Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
OPINION
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff Joyce Brown appeals the district court's award of summary judgment to defendant law enforcement officers on her civil rights and tort claims stemming from two encounters in August and December 2009. Having duly considered the district court's opinion and the record in light of the parties' appellate briefing, we find that plaintiff has not raised any argument that is not fairly and properly addressed in the district court's opinion. Although we review the district court's ruling de novo, we find no error. Concluding that a separate opinion would be duplicative and unnecessary, we hereby AFFIRM the district court's summary judgment ruling on the reasoning of its opinion.