Case Name: Howard Ebert, Henry Ebert, Jr., Harold Stattel and Edna M. Ebert, Appellants, v. Frederick Coyne, Respondent. (Action No. 1.); The Home Insurance Company, Respondent, v. Fred G. Coyne, Respondent. (Action No. 2.); Charles Staubitzer, Respondent, v. Frederick Coyne, Edna M. Ebert and Howard Ebert, Respondents. (Action No. 3.)
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1938-10-28
Citations: 255 A.D. 810
Docket Number: 
Parties: Howard Ebert, Henry Ebert, Jr., Harold Stattel and Edna M. Ebert, Appellants, v. Frederick Coyne, Respondent. (Action No. 1.) The Home Insurance Company, Respondent, v. Fred G. Coyne, Respondent. (Action No. 2.) Charles Staubitzer, Respondent, v. Frederick Coyne, Edna M. Ebert and Howard Ebert, Respondents. (Action No. 3.)
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 255
Pages: 810–810

Head Matter:
Howard Ebert, Henry Ebert, Jr., Harold Stattel and Edna M. Ebert, Appellants, v. Frederick Coyne, Respondent. (Action No. 1.) The Home Insurance Company, Respondent, v. Fred G. Coyne, Respondent. (Action No. 2.) Charles Staubitzer, Respondent, v. Frederick Coyne, Edna M. Ebert and Howard Ebert, Respondents. (Action No. 3.)

Opinion:
— Plaintiffs in one of three actions appeal from the order of Special Term, Nassau county, removing the several actions to the Supreme Court and consolidating them with the action pending in the Supreme Court. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. We cannot say from the record that the order appealed from passed beyond the limit of a sound judicial discretion. Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Adel, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents.