Case Name: ELLA T. LAUGHLIN, Respondent, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1942-03-04
Citations: 19 Cal. 2d 875
Docket Number: S. F. No. 16039
Parties: ELLA T. LAUGHLIN, Respondent, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Reports
Volume: 19
Pages: 875–876

Head Matter:
[S. F. No. 16039.
In Bank.
Mar. 4, 1942.]
ELLA T. LAUGHLIN, Respondent, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Appellant.
C. C. Carleton, Frank B. Durkee, C. R. Montgomery and Robert E. Reed for Appellant.
John J. O’Toole, City Attorney (San Francisco), Henry Heidelberg and Albert F. Skelly, Deputies City Attorney, Ray L. Chesebro, City Attorney (Los Angeles), William H. Neal and Leon T. David, Assistants City Attorney, and Arthur W. Nordstrom, Deputy City Attorney, as Amici Curiae, on behalf of Appellant.
Louis J. Trabucco and Eugene K. Sturgis for Respondent.
Holbrook & Tarr, Leslie R. Tarr, Hill, Morgan & Bledsoe, Stanley S. Burrill, Charles P. McCarthy, Kenneth K. Wright and Meserve, Mumper & Hughes, as Amici Curiae, on behalf of Respondent.

Opinion:
CARTER, J. —
Defendant herein appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County in favor of plaintiff, awarding $7,500 for the damages allegedly sustained by plaintiff as the result of the construction of a subway in the street fronting her property. This is one of a series of similar cases in which the facts, rights and liabilities, are substantially the same. All material legal questions here presented are disposed of in a decision this day filed in the case of Bose v. State of California, No. 16040, ante, p. 713 [123 Pac. (2d) 505], Upon the authorities there cited and for the reasons there given, the judgment herein is affirmed.
Shenk, J., Curtis, J., and Houser, J., concurred.
Appellant's petition for a rehearing was denied April 2, 1942. Gibson, C. J., Edmonds, J., and Traynor, J., voted for a rehearing.