Case Name: In the Matter of Elizabeth C. Kurtz et al., Respondents, v. Town of Amherst, Respondent, and William L. Kindel et al., Intervenors-Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1997-11-19
Citations: 244 A.D.2d 895
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Elizabeth C. Kurtz et al., Respondents, v Town of Amherst, Respondent, and William L. Kindel et al., Intervenors-Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 244
Pages: 895–896

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Elizabeth C. Kurtz et al., Respondents, v Town of Amherst, Respondent, and William L. Kindel et al., Intervenors-Appellants.
[665 NYS2d 129]

Opinion:
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted the petition, found a referendum petition invalid and directed its removal from the ballot. The petition is invalid because the preamble fails to comply with the statutory requirement that the voter state that his "present place of residence is truly stated opposite [his] signature" (Election Law § 6-140 [1] [a]; see, Election Law § 1-102; Town Law § 91; see generally, Matter of Graham v City Clerk of City of Ogdensburg, 104 AD2d 703; Matter of Lindley v Babylon Town Clerk, 80 AD2d 879, affd 53 NY2d 683; Heath v Town of Islip, 169 Misc 2d 382). In light of our decision, we do not reach the par ties' remaining contentions. (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Mahoney, J.—Election Law.) Present— Pine, J. P., Lawton, Hayes, Wisner and Boehm, JJ.