Case Name: George ROBINSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-10-03
Citations: 549 So. 2d 773
Docket Number: No. 88-2390
Parties: George ROBINSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and LEVY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 549
Pages: 773–774

Head Matter:
George ROBINSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 88-2390.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 3, 1989.
Bennett Brummer, Public Defender, and Gregory Sands, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, and Maria Brea Lipinski and John H. Lipin-ski, Miami, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Richard L. Polin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and LEVY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Pursuant to an order relinquishing jurisdiction to the trial court for that purpose, it made a specific finding of fact that the defendant had validly consented to the search of his van which revealed the crack cocaine in issue. Upon that finding, which is fully supported by the evidence adduced at the suppression hearing, the judgment under review is affirmed. See Zukor v. State, 488 So.2d 601, 603 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986), review denied, 496 So.2d 144 (Fla. 1986); Palmer v. State, 467 So.2d 1063, 1064 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); State v. Jones, 454 So.2d 774 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).