Case Name: WILLIAM DEFFUR ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. MICHAEL J. TANSEY, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1930-02-03
Citations: 106 N.J.L. 236
Docket Number: 
Parties: WILLIAM DEFFUR ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. MICHAEL J. TANSEY, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 106
Pages: 236–236

Head Matter:
WILLIAM DEFFUR ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. MICHAEL J. TANSEY, APPELLANT.
Argued May 31, 1929
Decided February 3, 1930.
For the respondents, Keating & Keating.
For the appellant, Michael J. Tansey.

Opinion:
Pee Cueiam. •
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Paekee, Kalisch, Campbell, Case, Bodine, Van Buskiek, McG-lennon, Kays, Heteield, Deae, JJ. 11.
For reversal — Hone.