Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Brian Dean BELL, Defendant- Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-07-21
Citations: 329 F. App'x 147
Docket Number: No. 08-30171
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Brian Dean BELL, Defendant— Appellant.
Judges: Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 329
Pages: 147–148

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Brian Dean BELL, Defendant— Appellant.
No. 08-30171.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 14, 2009.
Filed July 21, 2009.
Eric Vincent Carroll, Esquire, Assistant U.S., USGF — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Great Falls, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Evangelo Arvanetes, Assistant Federal Public Defender, FDMT — Federal Defenders of Montana, Great Falls, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Brian Dean Bell appeals from the 37-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for assault resulting in serious bodily injury, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 113(a)(6) and 1153. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Bell contends that the sentence imposed was unreasonable because, among other things, the district court failed to properly consider the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) and did not sufficiently explain the sentence. The district court did not procedurally err and the sentence is not substantively unreasonable. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 990-93 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.