Case Name: Tyrone K. POWELL, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2015-06-11
Citations: 167 So. 3d 392
Docket Number: No. SC14-593
Parties: Tyrone K. POWELL, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: LABARGA, C.J., and LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 167
Pages: 392–395

Head Matter:
Tyrone K. POWELL, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. SC14-593.
Supreme Court of Florida.
June 11, 2015.
Henry Gerome Gyden of the Anderson Law Group, P.A., Clearwater, FL, for Petitioner.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, and Joshua Ryan Heller, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, FL, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted jurisdiction under article V, section 3(b)(4) of the Florida Constitution to review Powell v. State, 133 So.3d 594 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014), in which the First District Court of Appeal certified the following questions to be of great public importance:
NOTWITHSTANDING MADDOX, SHOULD AN APPELLATE COURT CORRECT A SENTENCING ERROR IN AN ANDERS CASE WHICH WAS NOT PRESERVED PURSUANT TO THE APPLICABLE RULES OF PROCEDURE? IF NOT, WHAT STEPS SHOULD AN APPELLATE COURT FOLLOW TO CARRY OUT THE MANDATES OF ANDERS AND CAU-SEY IN SUCH A CASE?
After further consideration, we conclude that' review was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we dismiss review.
It is so ordered.
NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.
LABARGA, C.J., and LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur.
PARIENTE, J., dissents with an opinion.