Case Name: Roderick HILLIARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1991-07-09
Citations: 815 S.W.2d 24
Docket Number: No. 59455
Parties: Roderick HILLIARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 815
Pages: 24–25

Head Matter:
Roderick HILLIARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 59455.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
July 9, 1991.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 21, 1991.
Application to Transfer Denied Oct. 16, 1991.
Dave Hemingway, St. Louis, for appellant.
William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Millie Aulbur, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
This appeal results from the denial of appellant's, Roderick Hilliard's, motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035. Appellant seeks to have his case remanded for an evidentiary hearing to determine the voluntariness of his guilty plea to a charge of illegal sale of a controlled substance, RSMo § 195.211 (Supp.1990). In reviewing the record we fail to find that the trial court was clearly erroneous in their dismissal of appellant's claim and, therefore, affirm the judgment. Day v. State, 770 S.W.2d 692, 695 (Mo. banc 1989).
An extended opinion would serve no precedential purpose and we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Both parties have been furnished with a memorandum, solely for their information, setting forth the reasons for this order.