Case Name: Com. of Penna. v. Scott, Appellant
Court: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1931-05-01
Citations: 102 Pa. Super. 53
Docket Number: Appeals Nos. 94 and 95
Parties: Com. of Penna. v. Scott, Appellant.
Judges: Before Trebles, P. J., Keller, Linn, Gawthrop, Cunningham, Baleríos and Drew, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania Superior Court Reports
Volume: 102
Pages: 53–54

Head Matter:
Com. of Penna. v. Scott, Appellant.
"Argued March 1,0, 1931.
Before Trebles, P. J., Keller, Linn, Gawthrop, Cunningham, Baleríos and Drew, JJ.
William C. Alexander, for appellant.
William J. MacCarter, Jr., District Attorney, and with him Wm. B. McClenachan, Jr., First Assistant District Attorney, and Lome A. Bloom, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.
May 1, 1931:

Opinion:
Opinion by
Dbew, J.,
Defendant, a constable of the City of Chester, went to trial together with Edward Robinson and others upon indictments charging him with conspiracy, extortion, bribery, malfeasance, misfeasance, and nonfeasance in office. A verdict of "guilty on all charges" was returned by the jury and from the sentence of the court defendant appealed.
There are thirty-five assignments of error, and many of these are precisely the same as those sustained in the case of Commonwealth v. Robinson et al., No. 91 October Term, 1931, and for the reasons appearing in the opinion this day filed in that case, the same assignments are sustained here, and this judgment must be reversed and a new trial ordered.
The judgment is reversed and a venire facias de novo awarded.