Case Name: ROSA E. GERSTLEY, RESPONDENT, v. DAVID H. BEST ET AL., APPELLANTS
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1931-10-19
Citations: 108 N.J.L. 189
Docket Number: 
Parties: ROSA E. GERSTLEY, RESPONDENT, v. DAVID H. BEST ET AL., APPELLANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 108
Pages: 189–189

Head Matter:
ROSA E. GERSTLEY, RESPONDENT, v. DAVID H. BEST ET AL., APPELLANTS.
Submitted February 13, 1931
Decided October 19, 1931.
For the respondent, Cassman & Gottlieb.
For the appellants, Babcock & Champion.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Daly, Donges, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.