Case Name: In the Interest of: E.K.P., Plaintiff L.P. (Mother), Appellant v. JUVENILE OFFICER, Respondent Missouri Children's Division, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-09-11
Citations: 376 S.W.3d 711
Docket Number: No. WD 74593
Parties: In the Interest of: E.K.P., Plaintiff L.P. (Mother), Appellant v. JUVENILE OFFICER, Respondent Missouri Children’s Division, Respondent.
Judges: Before: JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Presiding Judge, ALOK AHUJA, Judge and MARK D. PFEIFFER, Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 376
Pages: 711–711

Head Matter:
In the Interest of: E.K.P., Plaintiff L.P. (Mother), Appellant v. JUVENILE OFFICER, Respondent Missouri Children’s Division, Respondent.
No. WD 74593.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Sept. 11, 2012.
Brad K Thoenen, Kansas City, for Appellant.
Claire M. Terrebonne, Kansas City, Co-counsel for Appellant.
William R. Jackson, for Respondent Juvenile Officer.
Garves P. Wiederaenders, for Respondent Missouri Children’s Division.
Before: JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Presiding Judge, ALOK AHUJA, Judge and MARK D. PFEIFFER, Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
L.P. appeals from a judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Jackson County assuming jurisdiction over her two-year-old daughter, E.K.P., concluding that E.K.P. was in need of care and treatment, and taking custody of E.K.P. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).