Case Name: MAURICE E. ATKINSON, Petitioner, v. EARL WARREN, as Attorney-General, etc., Respondent
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1939-08-15
Citations: 34 Cal. App. 2d 119
Docket Number: Civ. No. 12396
Parties: MAURICE E. ATKINSON, Petitioner, v. EARL WARREN, as Attorney-General, etc., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports, Second Series
Volume: 34
Pages: 119–119

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 12396.
Second Appellate District, Division One.
August 15, 1939.]
MAURICE E. ATKINSON, Petitioner, v. EARL WARREN, as Attorney-General, etc., Respondent.
Smith, Peek & Aspey and Bartlett & Kearney for Petitioner.

Opinion:
THE COURT.
COURT. The petition is denied for the reason that the facts alleged therein are insufficient to justify the issuance of a writ of mandate in accordance with the prayer of the petition.
White, J., was in favor of the issuance of said writ.