Case Name: Louis LOUISMEME, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2006-03-17
Citations: 932 So. 2d 359
Docket Number: No. 2D05-3125
Parties: Louis LOUISMEME, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: NORTHCUTT and CANADY, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 932
Pages: 359–360

Head Matter:
Louis LOUISMEME, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D05-3125.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
March 17, 2006.

Opinion:
SALCINES, Judge.
Louis Louismeme appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconvietion relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Because Louismeme's postconvietion motion is not properly sworn, we affirm. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(c). Our affirmance is without prejudice to any right Louismeme may have to file a verified motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to rule 3.850. Any such motion will not be deemed successive. We remind the postconvietion court that if it should again deny relief to any subsequent verified postconvietion motion Louismeme files, the court must attach portions of the record conclusively refuting the defendant's allegations.
Affirmed.
NORTHCUTT and CANADY, JJ., Concur.
. Hearsay documentation contained in the trial court record, such as a police report, can not conclusively refute a defendant's claim. See Carpenter v. State, 884 So.2d 385, 387 n. 3 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Wachter v. State, 868 So.2d 629, 630 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).