Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ronald Wallace, Also Known as Adrian Wallace, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1999-05-10
Citations: 261 A.D.2d 492
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ronald Wallace, Also Known as Adrian Wallace, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 261
Pages: 492–493

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ronald Wallace, Also Known as Adrian Wallace, Appellant.
[688 NYS2d 893]

Opinion:
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Cacciabaudo, J.), rendered August 20, 1996, convicting him of burglary in the first degree and sexual abuse in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of those branches of the defendant's omnibus motion which were to suppress identification testimony and a statement he made to law enforcement officials.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).
The defendant's remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are without merit. Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Krausman and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.