Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Keith Darnell McNEILL, a/k/a No Doubt, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-04-05
Citations: 372 F. App'x 370
Docket Number: No. 09-8222
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Keith Darnell McNEILL, a/k/a No Doubt, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 372
Pages: 370–370

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Keith Darnell McNEILL, a/k/a No Doubt, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-8222.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 30, 2010.
Decided: April 5, 2010.
Keith Darnell McNeill, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Bradenham, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Keith Darnell McNeill appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See United States v. Munn, 595 F.3d 183, 186-87 (4th Cir.2010). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order for the reasons stated there. See United States v. McNeill, No. 4:08-cr-00012-HCM-FBS-l (E.D.Va. Nov. 30, 2009). Further, we deny McNeill's motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.