Case Name: James STEVENS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1990-05-22
Citations: 789 S.W.2d 866
Docket Number: No. 57136
Parties: James STEVENS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 789
Pages: 866–867

Head Matter:
James STEVENS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 57136.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
May 22, 1990.
Henry B. Robertson, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Stewart M. Freilich, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, James Stevens, appeals from dismissal of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed appellant's allegations of error, the entire record upon which they are based, and the findings and conclusions of the motion court. We do not find the court's action to be clearly erroneous and find that an extended opinion would have no precedential value. We, therefore, affirm the court's dismissal of appellant's motion pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, which sets forth the basis of the court's decision.