Case Name: Hong CHENG, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-09-28
Citations: 144 F. App'x 327
Docket Number: No. 05-1074
Parties: Hong CHENG, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 144
Pages: 327–327

Head Matter:
Hong CHENG, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 05-1074.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 19, 2005.
Decided Sept. 28, 2005.
Sunit K. Joshi, Joshi & Associates, PC, New York, New York, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Emily Anne Radford, Assistant Director, Keith Ian Bernstein, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Hong Cheng, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying as untimely his motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board's order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen. See INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24, 112 S.Ct. 719, 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Cheng, No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ] (B.I.A. Dec. 20, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED