Case Name: Dudley Adamson, Respondent, v. Airweld, Inc., et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants et al., Defendants. A-1 Fire Control Ltd., Third-Party Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1992-12-21
Citations: 188 A.D.2d 575
Docket Number: 
Parties: Dudley Adamson, Respondent, v Airweld, Inc., et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants et al., Defendants. A-1 Fire Control Ltd., Third-Party Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 188
Pages: 575–575

Head Matter:
(December 21, 1992)
Dudley Adamson, Respondent, v Airweld, Inc., et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants et al., Defendants. A-1 Fire Control Ltd., Third-Party Defendant.

Opinion:
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Airweld, Inc., and Consolidated Oxygen and Equipment Corp. appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gloria Cohen Aronin, J.), dated December 12, 1990, as denied their motion to strike the plaintiff's note of issue.
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, with costs payable to the appellants by the plaintiff-respondent, and the appellants' motion to strike the plaintiff's note of issue is granted.
Contrary to the statement in the plaintiff's note of issue, pretrial discovery was not completed. Accordingly, the note of issue is stricken (see, H&Y Realty Co. v Baron, 121 AD2d 238; Heritage Knitwear v Jonathan Logan, Inc., 115 AD2d 389; Ortiz v Valdescastilla, 98 AD2d 610; Saljoughy v Saljoughy, 97 AD2d 935). Sullivan, J. P., Balletta, Eiber and Santucci, JJ., concur.