Case Name: Lowy & Donnath, Inc., Respondent, v. City of New York et al., Defendants, and T. Moriarty & Son, Inc., Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1984-05-10
Citations: 62 N.Y.2d 746
Docket Number: 
Parties: Lowy & Donnath, Inc., Respondent, v City of New York et al., Defendants, and T. Moriarty & Son, Inc., Appellant.
Judges: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wacht-ler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye concur.
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 62
Pages: 746–748

Head Matter:
Lowy & Donnath, Inc., Respondent, v City of New York et al., Defendants, and T. Moriarty & Son, Inc., Appellant.
Decided May 10, 1984
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Steven G. Rubin for appellant.
Daniel Diamond for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, on so much of that court's decision as holds that the purchase order did not incorporate by reference the general conditions of the prime contract between defendant T. Moriarty & Son, Inc., and the city, and, accordingly, that payment was due to plaintiff upon submission of each of the several invoices.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wacht-ler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye concur.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.