Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clarence D. COAKLEY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-12-20
Citations: 671 F. App'x 219
Docket Number: No. 16-7165
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clarence D. COAKLEY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 671
Pages: 219–219

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clarence D. COAKLEY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-7165
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: December 15, 2016
Decided: December 20, 2016
Clarence D. Coakley, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Fesak, Assistant United States Attorney, Seth Morgan Wood, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Clarence D. Coakley appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See United States v. Munn, 595 F.3d 183, 187 (4th Cir. 2010) ("[A] defendant who was convicted of a crack offense but sentenced pursuant to a mandatory statutory minimum sentence is ineligible for a reduction under § 3582(c)(2)."). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED