Case Name: Nathan Lipschitz, Appellant, v. Harry Kleinman and Others, Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1925-01
Citations: 212 A.D. 839
Docket Number: 
Parties: Nathan Lipschitz, Appellant, v. Harry Kleinman and Others, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 212
Pages: 839–839

Head Matter:
Nathan Lipschitz, Appellant, v. Harry Kleinman and Others, Respondents.

Opinion:
— Interlocutory judgment reversed upon the law, and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event, on the ground that it was error to exclude the testimony of the witness Sharfstein as to his conversation with the defendant Harry Kleinman regarding the agreement entered into between the plaintiff and defendants. The mere fact that this was offered in rebuttal after the defendants closed their case was not a good ground for excluding the testimony, no sufficient reason being shown by the defendants why the evidence should not then have been received. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Manning, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.