Case Name: Martin D. Chace, Respondent, v. Warsaw Water Works Company, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1896-10-27
Citations: 150 N.Y. 575
Docket Number: 
Parties: Martin D. Chace, Respondent, v. Warsaw Water Works Company, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 150
Pages: 575–575

Head Matter:
Martin D. Chace, Respondent, v. Warsaw Water Works Company, Appellant.
(Argued October 8, 1896;
decided October 27, 1896.)
Chace v. Warsaw W. W. Co., 79 Hun, lot, affirmed.
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered June 28, 1894, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee, but suspended for six months the operation of an injunction granted.
Eugene M. Bartlett for appellant.
Charles B. Newton for respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed, with costs, but the operation of the injunction is suspended for six months, on the opinion of Bradley, J., below.
All concur, except Haight, J., not sitting.