Case Name: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Rahiem Cardel FANT, Petitioner
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2015-08-07
Citations: 632 Pa. 444
Docket Number: 
Parties: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Rahiem Cardel FANT, Petitioner.
Judges: 
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 632
Pages: 444–445

Head Matter:
121 A.3d 432
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Rahiem Cardel FANT, Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Aug. 7, 2015.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 7th day of August, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue is:
Whether the Superior Court committed an error of law/ abuse of discretion in its February 9, 2015 Opinion and Order, in reversing the trial court suppression order based upon its own definition of "telephone calls" and overstepping its standard of review by placing itself as a fact-finder, instead of accepting the findings of fact espoused by the trial court, which were sufficiently supported by the evidence elicited at the suppression hearing?