Case Name: Stanley Wayne BLANKENSHIP, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-05-04
Citations: 132 S.W.3d 337
Docket Number: No. WD 62946
Parties: Stanley Wayne BLANKENSHIP, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before SPINDEN, P.J., HOLLIGER and HARDWICK, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 132
Pages: 337–338

Head Matter:
Stanley Wayne BLANKENSHIP, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 62946.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
May 4, 2004.
Mark A. Grothoff, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Andrea K. Spillars, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before SPINDEN, P.J., HOLLIGER and HARDWICK, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Stanley Blankenship appeals the denial of his Ride 29.15 motion following an evi-dentiary hearing. He contends his appel late counsel was ineffective in failing to assert the doctrine of destructive contradictions on direct appeal. Upon review of the review of the record, we find no error in the motion court's determination and affirm the judgment. The parties have been provided with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision because a published opinion would have no precedential value.
Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).