Case Name: In the Matter of the Application of John T. Mullane, Petitioner, for a Mandamus Order against John McKenzie, Commissioner of Docks of the City of New York, and Others, Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1934-10-11
Citations: 153 Misc. 255
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Application of John T. Mullane, Petitioner, for a Mandamus Order against John McKenzie, Commissioner of Docks of the City of New York, and Others, Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 153
Pages: 255–256

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Application of John T. Mullane, Petitioner, for a Mandamus Order against John McKenzie, Commissioner of Docks of the City of New York, and Others, Defendants.
Supreme Court, New York County,
October 11, 1934.
John B. Doyle [Charles H. Kelby of counsel], for the petitioner.
Paul Windels, Corporation Counsel [Thomas W. A. Crowe, Assistant Corporation Counsel, of counsel], for The City of New York, opposed.

Opinion:
Frankenthaler, J.
It appears without contradiction that Carroll was separated from, the competitive civil service for a period of almost four years. Under these circumstances his date of original appointment in the service must be deemed to be November 8, 1929. (Matter of O'Dea v. Delaney, 241 App. Div. 844; Matter of Weiher v. Greene, 239 id. 652.) (See, also, Koso v. Greene, 260 N. Y. 491.) The petitioner Mullane was accordingly entitled to be retained in the service in preference to Carroll. This motion for a peremptory order of mandamus is granted. Settle order.