Case Name: Johnny D. RICHARDSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Pete GEREN, Secretary of the Army, Department of the Army, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-03-19
Citations: 370 F. App'x 385
Docket Number: No. 09-2201
Parties: Johnny D. RICHARDSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Pete GEREN, Secretary of the Army, Department of the Army, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 370
Pages: 385–386

Head Matter:
Johnny D. RICHARDSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Pete GEREN, Secretary of the Army, Department of the Army, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 09-2201.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 16, 2010.
Decided: March 19, 2010.
Johnny D. Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Alex Gordon, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appel-lee.
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Johnny D. Richardson appeals the district court's order granting the Appellee's motion to dismiss Richardson's complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Richardson v. Geren, No. 1:08-cv-03121-CCB (D.Md. May 8, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.