Case Name: John M. WEINTRITT, Appellant, v. TRIPLED ENTERPRISES, INC., etc, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-12-22
Citations: 554 So. 2d 25
Docket Number: No. 88-432
Parties: John M. WEINTRITT, Appellant, v. TRIPLE-J ENTERPRISES, INC., etc, Appellees.
Judges: SMITH, ZEHMER and MINER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 554
Pages: 25–25

Head Matter:
John M. WEINTRITT, Appellant, v. TRIPLE-J ENTERPRISES, INC., etc, Appellees.
No. 88-432.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Dec. 22, 1989.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 29,1990.
C. Robert Edewaard, Gainesville, for appellant.
J. Randall Hooper of Scruggs & Carmichael, P.A., Gainesville, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Finding that competent substantial evidence provided a rational predicate for the jury verdict in this ease and that it does not clearly appear that the jury ignored the evidence or misperceived the merits of the case, we affirm. We decline to award attorneys' fees to either side. See Heindel v. Southside Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., 476 So.2d 266 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).
SMITH, ZEHMER and MINER, JJ., concur.