Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kevin Adrian COX, a/k/a Roundman, a/k/a Fatboy, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-03-13
Citations: 59 F. App'x 587
Docket Number: No. 02-7458
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kevin Adrian COX, a/k/a Roundman, a/k/a Fatboy, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 59
Pages: 587–588

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kevin Adrian COX, a/k/a Roundman, a/k/a Fatboy, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-7458.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 6, 2003.
Decided March 13, 2003.
Kevin Cox, Appellant Pro Se. Stuart A. Berman, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Kevin Adrian Cox seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Cox has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 1039-40, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). In addition, we decline to address issues raised for the first time on appeal. See Muth v. United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir.1993). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.