Case Name: Nathaniel Bynum et al., Respondents, v. Harry Feingold, Individually and Doing Business under the Name of Holiday Paint Company, et al., Defendants, and Pentagon Chemical & Paint Works, Inc., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1967-12-20
Citations: 29 A.D.2d 559
Docket Number: 
Parties: Nathaniel Bynum et al., Respondents, v. Harry Feingold, Individually and Doing Business under the Name of Holiday Paint Company, et al., Defendants, and Pentagon Chemical & Paint Works, Inc., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 29
Pages: 559–560

Head Matter:
Nathaniel Bynum et al., Respondents, v. Harry Feingold, Individually and Doing Business under the Name of Holiday Paint Company, et al., Defendants, and Pentagon Chemical & Paint Works, Inc., Appellant.

Opinion:
Appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 10, 1967 and made upon reargument, as directed appellant to furnish plaintiffs with copies of " all " labels utilized on cans containing paint manufactured, etc., on appellant's premises. Order modified by inserting in the last decretal paragraph of the order, after the words " copies of all the different labels utilized on cans of", the words " 100% alkyd flat enamel". As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. In our opinion, the discovery order should be limited to labels affixed to cans containing the kind of paint which the complaint alleges was bought by plaintiff Bynum. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Munder, JJ., concur.