Case Name: FORT LEE AND MANHATTAN REALTY CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. HARRINGTON COMPANY, RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1927-01-31
Citations: 103 N.J.L. 489
Docket Number: 
Parties: FORT LEE AND MANHATTAN REALTY CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. HARRINGTON COMPANY, RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 103
Pages: 489–489

Head Matter:
FORT LEE AND MANHATTAN REALTY CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. HARRINGTON COMPANY, RESPONDENT.
Submitted October 29, 1926
Decided January 31, 1927.
Bor the appellant, Wright, Vander Burgh & McCarthy.
Bor the respondent, Harry B. Brockhurst.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Black in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.