Case Name: Richard D. HURLES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dora B. SCHRIRO, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-03-19
Citations: 709 F.3d 1305
Docket Number: No. 08-99032
Parties: Richard D. HURLES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dora B. SCHRIRO, RespondentAppellee.
Judges: Before: PREGERSON, D.W. NELSON, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 709
Pages: 1305–1318

Head Matter:
Richard D. HURLES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dora B. SCHRIRO, RespondentAppellee.
No. 08-99032.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
March 19, 2013.
Michael Aaron Harwin, Esquire, Law Offices of Michael A. Harwin, PC, Tucson, AZ, Denise Irene Young, Denise I. Young, Tucson, AZ, for Petitioner-Appellant.
Kent Ernest Cattani, Chief Counsel, Arizona Attorney General’s Office, Phoenix, AZ, for Respondent-Appellee.
Before: PREGERSON, D.W. NELSON, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
The Court takes the respondent's Motion for Ruling on Respondent-Appellees' Petition for Rehearing En Banc and the petitioner's Motion to remand pursuant to Martinez v. Ryan, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1309, 182 L.Ed.2d 272 (2012), under submission. The Court defers ruling on these motions pending the resolution of Detrich v. Ryan, No. 08-99001.
IT IS SO ORDERED.