Case Name: Claude WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. JENKINS, Sergeant Deputy Sheriff; T. Stephens, Deputy; Phayme, Sergeant Deputy; McGauge, Deputy; Richmond City Sheriff Office, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-06-30
Citations: 187 F. App'x 312
Docket Number: No. 06-6307
Parties: Claude WILSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. J. JENKINS, Sergeant Deputy Sheriff; T. Stephens, Deputy; Phayme, Sergeant Deputy; McGauge, Deputy; Richmond City Sheriff Office, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 187
Pages: 312–313

Head Matter:
Claude WILSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. J. JENKINS, Sergeant Deputy Sheriff; T. Stephens, Deputy; Phayme, Sergeant Deputy; McGauge, Deputy; Richmond City Sheriff Office, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 06-6307.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted June 22, 2006.
Decided June 30, 2006.
Claude Wilson, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Claude Wilson appeals from the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint because he failed to return the "consent to collection of fees" form, as ordered by the court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Wilson v. Jenkins, No. 3:05-cv-00874-JRS (E.D.Va. Feb. 7, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
The dismissal was without prejudice to Wilson's right to refile his action.