Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nekolas M. EVANS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-08-22
Citations: 235 F. App'x 630
Docket Number: No. 06-10668
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nekolas M. EVANS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: KLEINFELD, SILVERMAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 235
Pages: 630–631

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nekolas M. EVANS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-10668.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 13, 2007 .
Filed Aug. 22, 2007.
Office of the U.S. Attorney Oakland, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Christopher Johns, Esq., Johns & Allyn, A Professional Corporation, San Rafael, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: KLEINFELD, SILVERMAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Nekolas M. Evans appeals from the district court's decision upon remand that it would not have sentenced Evans to a materially different sentence.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Evans' counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief has been filed. The government has filed notification that it does not intend to file an answering brief.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.