Case Name: Anthony GLOSTER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-05-24
Citations: 758 So. 2d 744
Docket Number: No. 3D99-2017
Parties: Anthony GLOSTER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and SHEVIN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 758
Pages: 744–744

Head Matter:
Anthony GLOSTER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D99-2017.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 24, 2000.
Ivy R. Ginsberg, Miami, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Regine Monestime, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and SHEVIN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the order of revocation of probation as there is sufficient evidence to establish that defendant was in constructive possession of a gun at the 61st Street address. See Amador v. State, 713 So.2d 1121 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)("Proof sufficient to allow a criminal conviction is not required to support a trial judge's discretionary order revoking probation; the state need only show by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant committed the offense charged."). This result renders it unnecessary to reach the propriety of revoking defendant's probation based on possession of the second gun at a different address.
Affirmed.