Case Name: Carlos NODA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1988-12-20
Citations: 534 So. 2d 1246
Docket Number: No. 87-1332
Parties: Carlos NODA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., HUBBART, J., and EDWARD T. BARFIELD, Associate Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 534
Pages: 1246–1246

Head Matter:
Carlos NODA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 87-1332.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 20, 1988.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Robert Burke, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Michele L. Crawford, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., HUBBART, J., and EDWARD T. BARFIELD, Associate Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We find no merit in the contention that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the defendant's conviction. Neither the appellant's evidentiary point nor his claim that the jury instructions were misleading was preserved below and neither presents fundamental error. Therefore, the judgment below is
AFFIRMED.