Case Name: Smith v. The Central Power Co.; Hamilton v. The Central Power Co.; Hammaker v. The Central Power Co.; Casey v. The Central Power Co.
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1921-12-06
Citations: 103 Ohio St. 681
Docket Number: Nos. 16764 to 16767
Parties: Smith v. The Central Power Co. Hamilton v. The Central Power Co. Hammaker v. The Central Power Co. Casey v. The Central Power Co.
Judges: Marshall, C. J., Hough, Robinson and Jones, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, New Service
Volume: 103
Pages: 681–704

Head Matter:
Smith v. The Central Power Co. Hamilton v. The Central Power Co. Hammaker v. The Central Power Co. Casey v. The Central Power Co.
Injunction — Erection of poles between lot line and curb — Electric trunk-line and local distributing wires — Municipal franchise-ordinance— Streets and alleys — Rights of abutting owners — Powers of municipal corporations.
(Nos. 16764 to 16767
Decided December 6, 1921.)
Error to the Court of Appeals of Crawford county.
Mr. W. C. Beer and Mr. Edward J. Myers, for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. Frank T. Dore and Mr. Charles Gallinger, for defendant in error.
[Reporter’s Note — The following announcement accompanied the decision in each of the foregoing cases!]

Opinion:
It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said court of appeals be and the same is hereby affirmed.
Four members of this court concur in this judgment, but all members concurring have not agreed upon the reasons therefor. It is therefore proper for such individual judges as concur in said judgment. to file separate opinions setting forth their reasons for their action.
Judgments affirmed.
Marshall, C. J., Hough, Robinson and Jones, JJ., concur.
Johnson, J., dissents.