Case Name: Cruikshank v. Sacks, Warden
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1961-03-01
Citations: 171 Ohio St. 552
Docket Number: No. 36714
Parties: Cruikshank v. Sacks, Warden.
Judges: Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and O’Neill, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, New Service
Volume: 171
Pages: 552–553

Head Matter:
Cruikshank v. Sacks, Warden.
(No. 36714
Decided March 1, 1961.)
Mr. Edwin Cruikshank, in propria persona.
Mr. Mark McElroy, attorney general, and Mr. Aubrey A. Wendt, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Petitioner had an adequate remedy by wav\ of appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence to re view the alleged irregularities of which he here complains and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in habeas corpus.
Petitioner remanded to custody.
Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and O'Neill, JJ., concur.