Case Name: George C. HOLLIDAY, Petitioner, v. CITY OF MIAMI et al., Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1966-03-09
Citations: 183 So. 2d 686
Docket Number: No. 34776
Parties: George C. HOLLIDAY, Petitioner, v. CITY OF MIAMI et al., Respondents.
Judges: THORNAL, C. J., and DREW, O’CON-NELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 183
Pages: 686–686

Head Matter:
George C. HOLLIDAY, Petitioner, v. CITY OF MIAMI et al., Respondents.
No. 34776.
Supreme Court of Florida.
March 9, 1966.
George F. Taylor, Jr., and Spencer & Taylor, Miami, for petitioner.
John R. Barrett, City Atty., and Robert F. Clark, Asst. City Atty., for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date August 20, 1965.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
The motion of petitioner for attorney's fees in this Court is denied.
It is so ordered.
THORNAL, C. J., and DREW, O'CON-NELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.