Case Name: Oestereick v. Roper et al.
Court: Colorado Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Colorado
Decision Date: 1950-06-05
Citations: 122 Colo. 59
Docket Number: No. 16,321
Parties: Oestereick v. Roper et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Colorado Reports
Volume: 122
Pages: 59–60

Head Matter:
No. 16,321.
Oestereick v. Roper et al.
(220 P. [2d] 551)
Decided June 5, 1950.
Rehearing denied July 1, 1950.
Mr. Herbert E. Mann, for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. Waldo & Waldo, for defendants in error.
En Banc.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Mr. Justice Stone did not participate in the consideration of this cause. Mr. Justice Jackson, Mr. Justice Hays and Mr. Justice Alter are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed, whereas, Mr. Chief Justice Hilliard, Mr. Justice Moore and Mr. Justice Holland think that it should be reversed. The judgment, therefore, must be affirmed by operation of law because of an evenly divided court, and no good purpose would be served by a statement of the issues or the reasons for the conclusions of the several members of the court. Rule 118(f) R.C.P. Colo.
Judgment affirmed.