Case Name: CORDIS CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION and Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-05-13
Citations: 504 F. App'x 922
Docket Number: No. 2012-1647
Parties: CORDIS CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION and Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before O’MALLEY, SCHALL, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 504
Pages: 922–922

Head Matter:
CORDIS CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION and Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 2012-1647.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
May 13, 2013.
Constantine L. Trela, Jr., Sidley Austin, LLP, of Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were David T. Pritikin, William H. Baumgart-ner, Jr., and Anthony Balkissoon. Of counsel was Linda R. Friedlieb.
Matthew M. Wolf, Arnold & Porter LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were Edward Han, John E. Nilsson and Seth I. Heller.
Before O’MALLEY, SCHALL, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the judgment of the district court without opinion. We vacate, however, the portion of the district court's decision "nullifying" (invalidating) dependent claims 14-16 of U.S. Patent No. 6,547,817. See Cordis Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corp., 868 F.Supp.2d 342, 356-57 (D.Del.2012).
AFFIRMED IN PART AND VACATED IN PART.