Case Name: JACOB KAPLAN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JACK EPSTEIN, TRADING AS CENTURY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1939-01-13
Citations: 121 N.J.L. 534
Docket Number: 
Parties: JACOB KAPLAN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JACK EPSTEIN, TRADING AS CENTURY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 121
Pages: 534–535

Head Matter:
JACOB KAPLAN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JACK EPSTEIN, TRADING AS CENTURY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Submitted October 28, 1938
Decided January 13, 1939.
For the appellant, Harry Kay.
For the respondent, Goldberg & Goldberg.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion delivered per curiam by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — -The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Walker, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.