Case Name: STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Robert Thomas RUMLEY, Defendant-Appellant.
Court: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2019-01-09
Citations: 432 P.3d 1204
Docket Number: A164006
Parties: STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Robert Thomas RUMLEY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and DeVore, Judge, and James, Judge.
Reporter: Pacific Reporter 3d
Volume: 432
Pages: 1204–1204

Head Matter:
STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Robert Thomas RUMLEY, Defendant-Appellant.
A164006
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Argued and submitted December 3, 2018.
January 9, 2019
Wayne Mackeson, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. Also on the brief was Wayne Mackeson, PC.
Adam Holbrook, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. Also on the brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, and Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General.
Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and DeVore, Judge, and James, Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Affirmed. See State v. Donathan , 281 Or. App. 781, 383 P.3d 946 (2016), rev. den. , 360 Or. 752, 388 P.3d 724 (2017) (construing ORS 813.010(5), a statute worded similarly to ORS 813.011(1), and concluding that the term "conviction" includes a finding of guilt); State v. Turntine , 265 Or. App. 323, 336 P.3d 513 (2014), rev. den. , 356 Or. 690, 344 P.3d 1112 (2015) (likewise applying principles of statutory construction to conclude that the term "convicted" in ORS 163.160(3) includes a finding of guilt).