Case Name: Dennis PENNING, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-03-07
Citations: 16 S.W.3d 679
Docket Number: No. ED 75697
Parties: Dennis PENNING, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANDALL, P.J. and HOFF, J. and PUDLOWSKI, S.J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 16
Pages: 679–679

Head Matter:
Dennis PENNING, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant/Respondent.
No. ED 75697.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
March 7, 2000.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 11, 2000.
Application for Transfer Denied May 30, 2000.
Stephen M. Tillery, Michael B. Marker, Carr, Korein, Tillery, Kunin, Montroy, Cates & Glass, East St. Louis, IL, for appellant.
Thompson Coburn LLP, Dan H. Ball, James W. Erwin, St. Louis, Walker & Williams, P.C., Thomas E. Jones, Belle-ville, IL, John P. Lord, Union Pacific Railroad Company, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before CRANDALL, P.J. and HOFF, J. and PUDLOWSKI, S.J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Dennis Penning appeals from the trial court judgment entered in favor of Union Pacific Railroad Company in a personal injury action.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error are without merit. The evidence in support of the jury verdict is not insufficient. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no jurisprudential value. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).