Case Name: Mireille TORJMAN, Appellant v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, et al., Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-01-03
Citations: 405 F. App'x 509
Docket Number: No. 10-5302
Parties: Mireille TORJMAN, Appellant v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, et al., Appellees.
Judges: BEFORE: SENTELLE, Chief Judge, and GINSBURG and BROWN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 405
Pages: 509–509

Head Matter:
Mireille TORJMAN, Appellant v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, et al., Appellees.
No. 10-5302.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Jan. 3, 2011.
Rehearing En Banc Denied Feb. 23, 2011.
Mireille Torjman, Washington, DC, pro se.
R. Craig Lawrence, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Washington, DC, for Appellees.
BEFORE: SENTELLE, Chief Judge, and GINSBURG and BROWN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief and appendix filed by appellant. See Fed. RApp. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's order filed July 20, 2010, be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed the complaint as frivolous, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), because the allegations lack an arguable basis in either law or fact. See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325, 109 S.Ct. 1827, 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989). The complaint contains factual allegations that are so implausible as to be "fantastic or delusional." Id. at 328, 109 S.Ct. 1827.
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.