Case Name: Francisco RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2017-04-05
Citations: 215 So. 3d 194
Docket Number: No. 3D15-2339
Parties: Francisco RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before ROTHENBERG, LOGUE, and SCALES, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 215
Pages: 194–195

Head Matter:
Francisco RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D15-2339
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Opinion filed April 5, 2017.
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Natasha Baker-Bradley, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Nikole Hiciano, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before ROTHENBERG, LOGUE, and SCALES, JJ.

Opinion:
LOGUE, J.
Any error by the trial court in admitting the hearsay statements at issue was, at best, harmless. See § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (2015) ("No judgment shall be set aside or reversed . on the ground of . the improper admission or rejection of evidence . unless in the opinion of the court to which application is made, after an examination of the entire case it shall appear that the error complained of has resulted in a miscarriage of justice.").
Affirmed.