Case Name: EDISON FIXTURE COMPANY, INCORPORATED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. GEORGE GOLDBERG, TRADING, ETC., DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1925-02-05
Citations: 3 N.J. Misc. 194
Docket Number: 
Parties: EDISON FIXTURE COMPANY, INCORPORATED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. GEORGE GOLDBERG, TRADING, ETC., DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 3
Pages: 194–194

Head Matter:
EDISON FIXTURE COMPANY, INCORPORATED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. GEORGE GOLDBERG, TRADING, ETC., DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.
Argued October 8, 1924
Decided February 5, 1925.
Before Justices Teen chard, Mikturn and Lloyd.
Por the appellant, Herman B. J. Weclcstein.
For the appellee, Frank 17. Davis.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Our examination of the record discloses no error justifying reversal. This case was argued with Edison Fixture Co., Inc., v. Copoulos, No. 475, of the present term, but it differs from that in a material matter. Here, the evidence permitted of the inference by the trial judge, sitting without a jury, that the-plaintiff deceived the defendant as to the fact that he was signing a contract, by the false representation that he was signing, as a matter of form, a paper having no obligatory force.
This testimony furnishes a basis for the jndment in favor of the defendant, which will be affirmed, with costs.