Case Name: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Carl William SACHETTE, Petitioner
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2016-08-04
Citations: 636 Pa. 393
Docket Number: No. 973 MAL 2015
Parties: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Carl William SACHETTE, Petitioner.
Judges: Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 636
Pages: 393–393

Head Matter:
143 A.3d 890
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Carl William SACHETTE, Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Aug. 4, 2016.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 4th day of August 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
(1) Assuming arguendo the trial record supports the verdict for unlawful contact with a minor, is the 25 to 50 year sentence otherwise unconstitutional?
This matter is consolidated with Commonwealth v. Bragg, 67 EAL 2016 and Commonwealth v. Macklin, 288 MAL 2015 for oral argument.
Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.