Case Name: Clara Westman, Appellant, v. Charles A. Stoneham and Ross F. Robertson, as Partners, etc., and Individually, Defendants. Ernest H. Clarke, Trading under the Name of E. H. Clarke & Co., and Individually, Respondent, etc.
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1926-12
Citations: 218 A.D. 859
Docket Number: 
Parties: Clara Westman, Appellant, v. Charles A. Stoneham and Ross F. Robertson, as Partners, etc., and Individually, Defendants. Ernest H. Clarke, Trading under the Name of E. H. Clarke & Co., and Individually, Respondent, etc.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 218
Pages: 859–859

Head Matter:
Clara Westman, Appellant, v. Charles A. Stoneham and Ross F. Robertson, as Partners, etc., and Individually, Defendants. Ernest H. Clarke, Trading under the Name of E. H. Clarke & Co., and Individually, Respondent, etc.

Opinion:
Order denying plaintiff's motion to compel defendant Clarke to write the sentences dictated, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. While we affirm the order appealed from, yet, in view of the importance of the question involved, and the apparent conflict of authority, we will allow an appeal to the Court of Appeals, if appellant is so advised. No opinion. Kelly, P. J., Jayeox, Manning, Young and Lazansky, JJ., concur.