Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gerardo GARCIA-ANTONIO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-09-21
Citations: 481 F. App'x 361
Docket Number: No. 09-10084
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gerardo GARCIA-ANTONIO, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 481
Pages: 361–361

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gerardo GARCIA-ANTONIO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-10084.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 10, 2012.
Filed Sept. 21, 2012.
Adrian Paulino Fontes, Counsel, The Law Offices of Adrian P. Fontes, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Gerardo Garcia-Antonio appeals from the 86-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Garcia-Antonio contends that the district court erred in applying a 16-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) on the basis of his pri- or California conviction for lewd and lascivious acts upon a child. The presentence report, to which Garcia-Antonio did not object, quoted from Garcia-Antonio's state-court plea agreement, in which he admitted facts that satisfy the generic definition of sexual abuse of a minor. See United States v. Castro, 607 F.3d 566, 569-70 (9th Cir.2010). Under these circumstances, the district court did not plainly err in applying the enhancement. See United States v. Gonzalez-Aparicio, 663 F.3d 419, 432-33 (9th Cir.2011).
Garcia-Antonio also contends that the appeal is moot because he has been released and deported. This contention fails because he is still serving his term of supervised release. See United States v. Rivas-Gonzalez, 384 F.3d 1034, 1042 (9th Cir.2004).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.