Case Name: MARY J. MENNONNA, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF PASQUALE PRESTO, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF, v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, DEFENDANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1928-07-07
Citations: 6 N.J. Misc. 712
Docket Number: 
Parties: MARY J. MENNONNA, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF PASQUALE PRESTO, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF, v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, DEFENDANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 6
Pages: 712–712

Head Matter:
MARY J. MENNONNA, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF PASQUALE PRESTO, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF, v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, DEFENDANT.
Argued January 17, 1928
Decided July 7, 1928.
Before Gummere, Chief Justice, and Justices Black and Lloyd.
For the rule, Theodore Strong.
Contra, Salvatore Muti.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This is defendant's rule for a new trial, and the reasons urged for making the rule absolute are that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence and that the damages are excessive.
We have carefully examined the proofs on both points, and reach the conclusion that neither contention is well founded.
The rule is therefore discharged.