Case Name: Thomas Hallam v. William Jacks
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1860-12
Citations: 11 Ohio St. 692
Docket Number: 
Parties: Thomas Hallam v. William Jacks.
Judges: 
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, New Service
Volume: 11
Pages: 692–692

Head Matter:
Thomas Hallam v. William Jacks.
Error to the district court of Clinton county.
Puller & Blair, for plaintiff in error.
Harlan & Harris, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
By the court.
Where the parties, on an appeal from a justice of the peace, proceed to trial before a jury, upon the transcript of the justice, without pleadings, and, no objection being taken, there is a verdict and judgment, the judgment will not be reversed on error, for such irregularity.
A charge of the court, found among the papers, indorsed-by the judge as the charge given by him, in the case, to the jury, but forming part of no bill of exceptions, will not be: regarded as a part of the record.
Judgment affirmed.