Case Name: Aaron W. WATKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1996-07-30
Citations: 926 S.W.2d 547
Docket Number: No. 69394
Parties: Aaron W. WATKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD, and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 926
Pages: 547–548

Head Matter:
Aaron W. WATKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 69394.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
July 30, 1996.
David C. Hemingway, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Becky Owenson Kilpatrick, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD, and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Aaron W. Watkins, appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying his Rule 24.035 motion with out an evidentiary hearing because the motion was not filed within the time constraints of Rule 24.035(b). We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment denying the Rule 24.035 motion is not clearly erroneous. Day v. State, 770 S.W.2d 692, 695 (Mo.banc 1989). As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).