Case Name: Ophelia Azriel De'LONTA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harold CLARKE, Director, Vadoc; G.K. Washington, Regional Admin.; Larry Edmonds, Warden, BKCC; Major C. Davis, Chief of Security; Davis, Institutional Investigator; Agent Watson, Internal Affairs Unit; Lisa Lang, Staff Psychologist; Sarah Pruitt, Correctional Officer, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-12-27
Citations: 502 F. App'x 265
Docket Number: No. 12-7634
Parties: Ophelia Azriel De’LONTA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harold CLARKE, Director, Vadoc; G.K. Washington, Regional Admin.; Larry Edmonds, Warden, BKCC; Major C. Davis, Chief of Security; Davis, Insti tutional Investigator; Agent Watson, Internal Affairs Unit; Lisa Lang, Staff Psychologist; Sarah Pruitt, Correctional Officer, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 502
Pages: 265–266

Head Matter:
Ophelia Azriel De’LONTA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harold CLARKE, Director, Vadoc; G.K. Washington, Regional Admin.; Larry Edmonds, Warden, BKCC; Major C. Davis, Chief of Security; Davis, Insti tutional Investigator; Agent Watson, Internal Affairs Unit; Lisa Lang, Staff Psychologist; Sarah Pruitt, Correctional Officer, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 12-7634.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 20, 2012.
Decided: Dec. 27, 2012.
Ophelia Azriel De’Lonta, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Antonio Pierre Jackson, Law Office of A. Pierre Jackson, P.C., Hampden-Sydney, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ophelia Azriel De'Lonta seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing all but one Defendant, Sarah Pruitt, in De'Lonta's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 387 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order De'Lonta seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order, as it disposes of fewer than all the parties involved in this lawsuit. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.