Case Name: ALLIANCE INS. CO. v. THE MORNING LIGHT
Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1862
Citations: 1 F. Cas. 526
Docket Number: 
Parties: ALLIANCE INS. CO. v. THE MORNING LIGHT.
Judges: Before BETTS, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Cases
Volume: 1
Pages: 526–526

Head Matter:
Case No. 246a.
ALLIANCE INS. CO. v. THE MORNING LIGHT.
[Betts’ Ser. Bk. 531.]
District Court, S. D. New York,
1862.
Admiraltt — Practice—Appraisement.
[Where the clerk, at the instance of the claimant of an arrested vessel, and without notice to libelant’s proctor, nominates an appraiser, and posts notice of the appraisement, the proceedings are irregular, and the appraisement should be set aside.]
[In admiralty. Libel in rem by the Alliance Insurance Company against the brig Morning Light to recover damages suffered by the schooner Jerry Fowler in a collision, and paid by libelant as insurer. Heard on libelant’s motion to set aside an appraisement of the brig. Granted.]
Benedict, Scoville & Benedict, for libelant.
Beebe & Donohue, for claimants.
Before BETTS, District Judge.
In this case the brig was arrested, and in the custody of the marshal. Without notice to the libellant’s proctor, the clerk, at the instance of the claimants, proceeded to nominate an appraiser; the notice of the ap-praisement was posted up, and the vessel appraised. The libellants thereupon moved to set aside the proceedings as irregular.

Opinion:
BY THE COURT. The rules in respect to the appraisement of the property under arrest all plainly contemplate a common action of the parties interested, or an opportunity to act together. The 61st rule permits proceedings instanter for appraisement in suits by the United States in rem, if the district attorney and claimants are in presence of the court. In individual actions, either party may have an order entered of course for appraisal, or it may be done by mutual consent, and if the parties do not agree in writing upon the appraiser, the clerk shall name him, each party having a right to appeal instanter. Rules 62-69. These regulations imply that both parties are made cognizant of the action taken for the discharge of the property arrested. Betts, Adm. Pr. 43. The 40th rule expressly directs notice to be given libellant's proctor of applications for delivering up property on stipulation which is under arrest. The proceedings in this case must therefore be regarded as irregular, and the appraisement be set aside.