Case Name: Joe Picarino v. The State
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1928-05-16
Citations: 110 Tex. Crim. 120
Docket Number: No. 11635
Parties: Joe Picarino v. The State.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Criminal Reports
Volume: 110
Pages: 120–122

Head Matter:
Joe Picarino v. The State.
No. 11635.
Delivered May 16, 1928.
Rehearing denied June 23, 1928.
The opinion states the case.
F. G. Vaughn of Beaumont, for appellant.
A. A. Dawson of Canton, State’s Attorney for the State.

Opinion:
HAWKINS, Judge.
Conviction is for theft of an automobile, punishment being assessed at two years in the penitentiary.
The State's Attorney calls our attention to the fact that the motion for new trial was overruled on the 15th day of October at which time ninety days was given in which to file statement of facts and bills of exception. This time expired on the 13th day of January and the statement of facts and bills of exception were not filed until the 14th day of January, one day too late to permit consideration. Art. 760 C. C. P., 1925. Johnson v. State, 104 Tex. Cr. R. 384, 283 S. W. 807; Daniel v. State, 104 Tex. Cr. R. 604, 286 S. W. 221; Williams v. State, 229 S. W. 258; Chisholm, et al. v. State, 1 (2d) S. W. 613.
The judgment must be affirmed without reference to the statement of facts of bills of exception and it is so ordered.
Affirmed.