Case Name: Oliver MARSHALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1981-07-08
Citations: 400 So. 2d 567
Docket Number: No. 80-1369
Parties: Oliver MARSHALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: BOARDMAN, A. C. J., and RYDER and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 400
Pages: 567–567

Head Matter:
Oliver MARSHALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 80-1369.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
July 8, 1981.
Jerry Hill, Public Defender, Bartow, and Allyn Giambalvo, Asst. Public Defender, St. Petersburg, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Peggy A. Quince, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the revocation of appellant's probation, but we remand this case for correction of the written revocation order. Affidavits were filed by appellant's probation officer charging appellant with violating conditions (1), (2) and (5) of his probation. Condition (2) required payment of $10.00 per month for probation supervision. Appellant testified that he was financially unable to make these payments and the state failed to offer evidence showing otherwise. Absent evidence of appellant's ability to pay, the trial court cannot properly find a violation of the condition requiring payment of supervisory costs. Abel v. State, 383 So.2d 325 (Fla.2d DCA 1980). However, the order revoking probation states that appellant violated condition (2) as well as conditions (1) and (5). Accordingly, the court should extract the reference to violation of condition (2) from its order. Brouillett v. State, 373 So.2d 449 (Fla.2d DCA 1979).
BOARDMAN, A. C. J., and RYDER and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.