Case Name: Conley et al., Appellees, v. Faurecia Exhaust Systems, Inc. et al.; R & D Machine, Inc., Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2010-11-02
Citations: 127 Ohio St. 3d 122
Docket Number: No. 2010-1192
Parties: Conley et al., Appellees, v. Faurecia Exhaust Systems, Inc. et al.; R & D Machine, Inc., Appellant.
Judges: Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 127
Pages: 122–122

Head Matter:
Conley et al., Appellees, v. Faurecia Exhaust Systems, Inc. et al.; R & D Machine, Inc., Appellant.
[Cite as Conley v. Faurecia Exhaust Sys., Inc., 127 Ohio St.3d 122, 2010-Ohio-5272.]
(No. 2010-1192
Submitted September 28, 2010
Decided November 2, 2010.)
Volkema, Thomas, Miller & Scott, Michael S. Miller, and Warner M. Thomas Jr., for appellees.
Freund, Freeze & Arnold, Gordon D. Arnold, and Patrick J. Janis, for appellant.

Opinion:
{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.
{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Pettiford v. Aggarwal, 126 Ohio St.3d 413, 2010-Ohio-3237, 934 N.E.2d 913, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for further proceedings consistent with Pettiford v. Aggarwal.
Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Brown, C.J., and Pfeifer, J., dissent and would not accept the discretionary appeal.