Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Manuel AGUILAR-BARRAGAN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-03-28
Citations: 272 F. App'x 598
Docket Number: No. 07-30217
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Manuel AGUILAR-BARRAGAN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 272
Pages: 598–598

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Manuel AGUILAR-BARRAGAN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-30217.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 18, 2008.
Filed March 28, 2008.
Donald E. Kresse, Jr., Esq., USYA— Office of the U.S. Attorney, Yakima, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Tracy A. Staab, Esq., FPDWA — Federal Public Defender’s Office, Spokane, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: CANBY, T.G. NELSON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Manuel Aguilar-Barragan appeals from the 33-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being an alien in the United States after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Aguilar-Barragan contends that his sentence is unreasonable. We conclude that his sentence is reasonable. See Gall v. United States, — U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 586, 597-98, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007).
Aguilar-Barragan also contends that the district court erred by applying a 16-level Guideline enhancement after finding him removed subsequent to a prior felony conviction. We conclude that any error was harmless. See United States v. Zepeda-Martinez, 470 F.3d 909, 913-14 (9th Cir.2006).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.