Case Name: IN the INTEREST OF: W.B. and A.B.; Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. B.B. (Father) and L.B. (Mother), Appellants
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2017-08-29
Citations: 527 S.W.3d 165
Docket Number: WD 80351
Parties: IN the INTEREST OF: W.B. and A.B.; Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. B.B. (Father) and L.B. (Mother), Appellants.
Judges: Before Division Three: Alok Ahuja, Presiding Judge, Thomas H. Newton, Judge and Cynthia L. Martin, Judge
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 527
Pages: 165–165

Head Matter:
IN the INTEREST OF: W.B. and A.B.; Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. B.B. (Father) and L.B. (Mother), Appellants.
WD 80351
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
ORDER FILED: August 29, 2017
Lori A. Fluegel, Kansas City, MO, for respondent.
David S. Ladwig, Kansas City, MO, for appellant B.B.
Laurie Vaskov Snell, Kansas City, MO, for appellant L.B.
Before Division Three: Alok Ahuja, Presiding Judge, Thomas H. Newton, Judge and Cynthia L. Martin, Judge

Opinion:
ORDER
Per curiam-:
B.B. ("Father") and L.B. ("Mother") appeal from the trial court's judgment terminating their parental rights to W.B. and A.B. ("Children"). Father and Mother (collectively, "Parents") argue that the trial court erred in finding statutory grounds for terminating their parental rights. The Parents also claim that the trial court abused its discretion in finding that termination was in the best interests of the Children. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).