Case Name: Antonio MOSLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT; J. Redferm, Detective; Jim Agetrick, Detective; Tammy Clary, Detective, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-05-29
Citations: 521 F. App'x 270
Docket Number: No. 13-6395
Parties: Antonio MOSLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT; J. Redferm, Detective; Jim Agetrick, Detective; Tammy Clary, Detective, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 521
Pages: 270–270

Head Matter:
Antonio MOSLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT; J. Redferm, Detective; Jim Agetrick, Detective; Tammy Clary, Detective, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 13-6395.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 23, 2013.
Decided: May 29, 2013.
Antonio Mosley, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Judge Motz did not participate in consideration of this case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Antonio Mosley appeals the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mosley v. Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Dep't, No. 3:13-cv-00070-RJC, 2013 WL 653275 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 21, 2013). We deny Mosley's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.