Case Name: LOUIS SCHEINMAN ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. FANNIE BLOCH ET AL., RESPONDENTS
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1923-02-01
Citations: 98 N.J.L. 571
Docket Number: 
Parties: LOUIS SCHEINMAN ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. FANNIE BLOCH ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 98
Pages: 571–571

Head Matter:
LOUIS SCHEINMAN ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. FANNIE BLOCH ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Submitted December 11, 1922
Decided February 1, 1923.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 97 N. J. L. 404.
For the appellants, Clarence Kelsey.
For the respondents, Frederick K. Hopkins.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenhetmer, Williams, Gardner, Ackérson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 13.
For reversad — None.