Case Name: Cassandra OLIVER, Petitioner v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2009-12-29
Citations: 605 Pa. 72
Docket Number: No. 363 WAL 2009
Parties: Cassandra OLIVER, Petitioner v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 605
Pages: 72–72

Head Matter:
987 A.2d 680
Cassandra OLIVER, Petitioner v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Dec. 29, 2009.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 29th day of December, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issues, rephrased for clarity, are:
(1) In light of Section 25(b) of Act 44, does the City of Pittsburgh have a valid subrogation claim against Petitioner Cassandra Oliver's settlement with the third party tortfeasor equal to the amount of benefits that she received under the Heart and Lung Act?
(2) Does Petitioner Cassandra Oliver have immunity from the City of Pittsburgh's reimbursement claim under Section 23 of Act 44?