Case Name: Sean DOUGHERTY, Appellant/Claimant, v. CUSTOM CELLULAR, INC., and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2018-03-13
Citations: 543 S.W.3d 76
Docket Number: No. ED 105873
Parties: Sean DOUGHERTY, Appellant/Claimant,
v.
CUSTOM CELLULAR, INC., and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.
Judges: Before Colleen Dolan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 543
Pages: 76–77

Head Matter:
Sean DOUGHERTY, Appellant/Claimant,
v.
CUSTOM CELLULAR, INC., and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.
No. ED 105873
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
FILED: March 13, 2018
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT-Claimant: Sean Dougherty, Pro Se, 2578 Coppergate Square Dr., Apartment K, St. Louis, MO 63129-6197.
ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT: Bart Anton Matanic-attorney for Division of Employment Security, 421 East Dunklin Street, Box 59, Jefferson City, MO 65104, Custom Cellular, Inc., Pro Se, 7501 W. Memorial Road, MS 220, Oklahoma City, OK 73142.
Before Colleen Dolan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Sean Dougherty ("Claimant") appeals from the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission disqualifying him from unemployment benefits after his termination from his employment with Custom Cellular, Inc. because of misconduct connected with work. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).