Case Name: Eugene NESBITT, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael G. BERG, Defendant-Appellee, Parris N. Glendening; Martin O'Malley; Edward T. Norris, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-04-04
Citations: 223 F. App'x 226
Docket Number: No. 06-7574
Parties: Eugene NESBITT, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael G. BERG, Defendant-Appellee, Parris N. Glendening; Martin O’Malley; Edward T. Norris, Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 223
Pages: 226–226

Head Matter:
Eugene NESBITT, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael G. BERG, Defendant-Appellee, Parris N. Glendening; Martin O’Malley; Edward T. Norris, Defendants.
No. 06-7574.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 29, 2007.
Decided: April 4, 2007.
Eugene Nesbitt, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Eugene Nesbitt, Jr. appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Nesbitt v. Berg, No. 1:06-cv-01605-WMN (D.Md. Aug. 30, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.