Case Name: BEACON FRUIT & PRODUCE CO., Inc., et al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. H. HARRIS & CO., Inc., et al., Defendants, Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1958-11-19
Citations: 260 F.2d 958
Docket Number: No. 5363
Parties: BEACON FRUIT & PRODUCE CO., Inc., et al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. H. HARRIS & CO., Inc., et al., Defendants, Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 260
Pages: 958–958

Head Matter:
BEACON FRUIT & PRODUCE CO., Inc., et al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. H. HARRIS & CO., Inc., et al., Defendants, Appellees.
No. 5363.
United States Court of Appeals First Circuit.
Nov. 19, 1958.
Sigmund Timberg, Washington, D. C., with whom Lawrence R. Cohen, Boston, Mass., was on brief, for appellants.
Richard Maguire, Boston, Mass., with whom Thomas J. Carens, Robert J. Sherer, John L. Saltonstall, Jr., I. J. Silverman, Maguire, Roche & Leen and Hill, Barlow, Goodale & Adams, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for appellees.
Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, and WOODBURY and HARTIGAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This appeal involves an action for treble damages under the federal antitrust laws. We are entirely satisfied that the findings of fact by the district court were amply supported by the evidence, and that on these findings the district court had to enter the judgment it did, namely a judgment dismissing the action on the merits.
A judgment will be entered affirming the judgment of the District Court.