Case Name: In the Interest of A.P.D. and C.S., Minors
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-06-12
Citations: 46 S.W.3d 672
Docket Number: Nos. ED 78462, ED 78466
Parties: In the Interest of A.P.D. and C.S., Minors.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, Jr., J., and JAMES R. DOWD, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 46
Pages: 672–672

Head Matter:
In the Interest of A.P.D. and C.S., Minors.
Nos. ED 78462, ED 78466.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
June 12, 2001.
Lisa M. Thompson, Your Neighborhood Lawyer, Ballwin, MO, for appellants.
Thad Hollie, Jr., Montgomery Hollie & Associates, L.L.C., Rita M. Montgomery, St. Louis, MO, for respondent Rita Sue Haley.
Sherry Taylor, St. Louis, MO, for respondent Mo. Div. of Family Services.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, Jr., J., and JAMES R. DOWD, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Laura Bechtold, natural mother of A.P.D. and C.S., appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County terminating her parental rights in A.P.D. and C.S., minor children, pursuant to section 211.447.5 RSMo (2000). Bech-told argues that the trial court erred in relying on the diagnosis and recommendations of a social worker and that the courts findings were against the weight of the evidence.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file and transcripts. There is substantial evidence in the record to support the judgment of the juvenile court and we find no error of law. As an extended opinion reciting the facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would have no precedential value, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).