Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas Jerome LUNDY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-08-31
Citations: 668 F. App'x 866
Docket Number: No. 16-10140 Non-Argument Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas Jerome LUNDY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILSON, ROSENBAUM and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 668
Pages: 866–867

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas Jerome LUNDY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-10140 Non-Argument Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Date Filed: 08/31/2016
Francis Todd Williams, Pamela C. Marsh, Gregory Patrick McMahon, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Gainesville, FL, Robert G. Davies, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Pensacola, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Darren James Johnson, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Gainesville, FL, Randolph Patterson Murrell, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Tallahassee, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Thomas Jerome Lundy, Pro Se.
Before WILSON, ROSENBAUM and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Richard M. Sumraa, appointed counsel for Thomas Jerome Lundy in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Lundy's conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.