Case Name: MARIA A. PFEIFFER, RESPONDENT, v. JAMES E. CROSSLEY, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1919-02-06
Citations: 92 N.J.L. 638
Docket Number: 
Parties: MARIA A. PFEIFFER, RESPONDENT, v. JAMES E. CROSSLEY, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 92
Pages: 638–638

Head Matter:
MARIA A. PFEIFFER, RESPONDENT, v. JAMES E. CROSSLEY, APPELLANT.
Submitted December 9, 1918
Decided February 6, 1919.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 91 N. J. L. 433.
For the respondent, Louis J. Beers.
For the appellant, Abner Kalisch.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.