Case Name: Walden v. The State
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1923-01-11
Citations: 29 Ga. App. 387
Docket Number: 14063
Parties: Walden v. The State.
Judges: Luhe and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 29
Pages: 387–387

Head Matter:
14063.
Walden v. The State.
Decided January 11, 1923.
Accusation of possession of liquor;. from city court of Thomas-ville — Judge W. H- Hammond. October 6, 1922. ■ ,
J. M.. Austin, Ira Carlisle, for plaintiff in error.
H. J. MacIntyre, solicitor, contra.

Opinion:
Broyles, C. J.
The motion for a new trial contains the usual general grounds only. The evidence relied upon for a conviction, while circumstantial, is sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the defendant's guilt, and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.
Judgment affirmed.
Luhe and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.