Case Name: City of Ventnor, appellant, v. J. Harry Fulmer et al., respondents
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1922-04-28
Citations: 93 N.J. Eq. 660
Docket Number: 
Parties: City of Ventnor, appellant, v. J. Harry Fulmer et al., respondents.
Judges: For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black,, Katzenbaci-i, White, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk — 14.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 93
Pages: 660–661

Head Matter:
City of Ventnor, appellant, v. J. Harry Fulmer et al., respondents.
[Decided April 28th, 1922.]
On appeal from 'a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Learning, whose opinion is reported in 92 N. J. Eq. lft 8.
Messrs. Bourgeois é Coulomb, for the appellant.
Mr. Theodore W. Schimpf, for the respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black,, Katzenbaci-i, White, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk — 14.
For reversal — None.