Case Name: NATIONAL BANK OF DEPOSIT OF CITY OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff, v. ROGERS et al., Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1899-11-17
Citations: 61 N.Y.S. 1143
Docket Number: 
Parties: NATIONAL BANK OF DEPOSIT OF CITY OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff, v. ROGERS et al., Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 61
Pages: 1143–1143

Head Matter:
NATIONAL BANK OF DEPOSIT OF CITY OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff, v. ROGERS et al., Defendants.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
November 17, 1899.)
Action by the National Bank of Deposit of the City of New York against Henry P. Rogers and others, executors, etc. There was a judgment in favor of plaintiff, and defendants move for a new trial on exceptions. Motion denied. Thaddeus D. ICenneson, for the motion. Ambrose G. Todd, opposed.

Opinion:
PATTERSON, J.
As the result of what is stated in the opinion on the appeal from the judgment in this case (decided herewith; 01 N. Y. Supp. 155), the motion for new trial must be denied, with costs. All concur, except MCLAUGHLIN, J., who dissents.