Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kevin COX, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-03-27
Citations: 31 F. App'x 266
Docket Number: No. 01-7730
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kevin COX, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 31
Pages: 266–266

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kevin COX, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 01-7730.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 14, 2002.
Decided March 27, 2002.
Kevin Cox, Appellant Pro Se. Tarra R. DeShields-Minnis, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Kevin Cox seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying his motions filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001) and 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Cox, Nos. CR-99-52-S; CA-01-2640 S (D. Md. Sept. 6 & 18, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.