Case Name: Victor Murdoch SHEMWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1980-10-29
Citations: 391 So. 2d 218
Docket Number: No. 80-976
Parties: Victor Murdoch SHEMWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: BOARDMAN, Acting C. J., and OTT and RYDER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 391
Pages: 218–219

Head Matter:
Victor Murdoch SHEMWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 80-976.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Oct. 29, 1980.
Jack 0. Johnson, Public Defender, and Robert F. Moeller, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Eula Tuttle Mason, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed, but the case is remanded for resen-tencing. The sentence incorrectly failed to provide the period of credit time to be allowed appellant as required by Section 921.-161(1), Florida Statutes (1979). Brooker v. State, 362 So.2d 697 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). Appellant need not be present at resentenc-ing.
BOARDMAN, Acting C. J., and OTT and RYDER, JJ., concur.