Case Name: Peggy Tams, individually and as executrix of the estate of Raymond E. Tams, deceased, complainant-respondent, v. Morton Abrams, Ramos & Company, Incorporated, a New Jersey corporation, and Paramount Investment Corporation, a New Jersey corporation, defendants-appellants
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1936-04-24
Citations: 120 N.J. Eq. 253
Docket Number: 
Parties: Peggy Tams, individually and as executrix of the estate of Raymond E. Tams, deceased, complainant-respondent, v. Morton Abrams, Ramos & Company, Incorporated, a New Jersey corporation, and Paramount Investment Corporation, a New Jersey corporation, defendants-appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 120
Pages: 253–265

Head Matter:
Peggy Tams, individually and as executrix of the estate of Raymond E. Tams, deceased, complainant-respondent, v. Morton Abrams, Ramos & Company, Incorporated, a New Jersey corporation, and Paramount Investment Corporation, a New Jersey corporation, defendants-appellants.
[Argued February term, 1936.
Decided April 24th, 1936.]
Messrs. Scholland & Schotland, for the defendant-appellant Paramount Investment Corporation.
Messrs. Osborne, Cornish & Scheck and Mr. Ervin S. Fulop, for the complainant-respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The pleadings and proofs in this case have been carefully examined. The conclusions of the vice-chancellor are abundantly supported by the evidence adduced.
The decree is affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.