Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roger BENSON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-01-26
Citations: 363 F. App'x 483
Docket Number: No. 09-30166
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roger BENSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: BEEZER, TROTT, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 363
Pages: 483–484

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roger BENSON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-30166.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 11, 2010.
Filed Jan. 26, 2010.
Thomas John Hanlon, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Yakima, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Rebecca Louise Pennell, Esquire, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Defenders of Eastern Washington & Idaho, Yakima, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: BEEZER, TROTT, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Roger Benson appeals from the 33-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for escape from custody, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 751. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Benson contends that the district court plainly erred when it failed to give him credit for the time served on an undis charged concurrent state sentence, under U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3(b)(l).
Benson's contention lacks merit because the state sentence did not result from "relevant conduct," see U.S.S.G § 1B1.3, and was not used to increase Benson's base offense level. Cf. United States v. Armstead, 552 F.3d 769, 783-84 (9th Cir.2008).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.