Case Name: Patricia Morrone Crockett v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company
Court: Virginia Beach Circuit Court
Jurisdiction: Virginia
Decision Date: 1971-12-03
Citations: 7 Va. Cir. 418
Docket Number: Case No. (Law) 14781
Parties: Patricia Morrone Crockett v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company
Judges: 
Reporter: Virginia Circuit Court Opinions
Volume: 7
Pages: 418–419

Head Matter:
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
Patricia Morrone Crockett v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company
December 3, 1971
Case No. (Law) 14781

Opinion:
By JUDGE PHILIP L. RUSSO
Plaintiff has filed a motion for judgment asking for $18,181.00 as a result of an alleged loss due to a burglary which allegedly occurred on or about August 3, 1969. She claims that the defendant is indebted to her by virtue of a certain policy of insurance which she claims covers the contents of her house.
The defendant has filed a special plea of the statute of limitations on the grounds that the action has not been timely filed due to the fact that the said insurance policy contains the following provisions:
No suit or action on this policy for the recovery of any claim shall be sustainable in any court of law or equity unless all the requirements of this policy shall have been complied with, and unless commenced within twelve months after inception of the loss.
The suit in question was filed on July 20, 1971, which was almost two years after the alleged loss.
Counsel have stipulated that the above provision is contained in the policy which is the subject of this suit.
Plaintiff contends that during the twelve months period following the alleged loss, that she was incompetent and that this tolled the said period of limitation.
Counsel for the defendant, in his memorandum, argues that this is a contractual limitation agreed upon by the parties and is not the same as the statutory limitation and that it would not be tolled as is set forth in § 8*30, Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended.
The court agrees with counsel for the defendant. Even though he has labeled his pleading as a "Special Plea of Statute of Limitations," it is actually a special plea of a policy condition. The court agrees that since this is a condition of the policy and not a statutory limitation, it is not tolled during any period of disabili* ty.