Case Name: Peggye Rousseau NORMAN, Appellant, v. Oscar Frank NORMAN, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1969-12-18
Citations: 229 So. 2d 1
Docket Number: No. L-470
Parties: Peggye Rousseau NORMAN, Appellant, v. Oscar Frank NORMAN, Appellee.
Judges: JOHNSON, C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ-, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 229
Pages: 1–1

Head Matter:
Peggye Rousseau NORMAN, Appellant, v. Oscar Frank NORMAN, Appellee.
No. L-470.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.
Dec. 18, 1969.
Arthur T. Boone, Jacksonville, and Tom E. Gilman, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Henry H. Wells, of Dawson, Galant, Maddox, Boyer, Sulik & Nichols, Jacksonville, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
After careful consideration of the record and briefs and oral arguments of counsel, it appears to us that we are controlled by the principle enunciated in Grant v. Corbitt, 95 So.2d 25 (Fla.1957), and although we may have reached a different conclusion from the trial judge had we been the trier of the facts, we must affirm on authority of above cited case, pointing out, however, that this decision does not preclude further petitions for modification if changes arise affecting the best interests of the minor child.
Affirmed.
JOHNSON, C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ-, concur.