Case Name: JOSEPH A. OSBORNE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. THE BOROUGH OF SPRING LAKE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1900-03-05
Citations: 64 N.J.L. 362
Docket Number: 
Parties: JOSEPH A. OSBORNE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. THE BOROUGH OF SPRING LAKE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 64
Pages: 362–362

Head Matter:
JOSEPH A. OSBORNE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. THE BOROUGH OF SPRING LAKE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Submitted December 12, 1899
Decided March 5, 1900.
On error to the Supreme Court.
For the plaintiff in error, Hawkins & Durand.
For the defendant in error, R. Ten Broeck & Wesley B. Stout.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the memorandum filed in that court.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Depue, Yak Syckel, Garrison, Lippincott, Gummere, Bogert, Nixon, Hendrickson, Adams, Yredenburgh. 11.
For reversal—None.