Case Name: Albert GRAY, Sr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2004-03-12
Citations: 868 So. 2d 633
Docket Number: No. 2D03-4316
Parties: Albert GRAY, Sr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: WHATLEY and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 868
Pages: 633–634

Head Matter:
Albert GRAY, Sr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D03-4316.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
March 12, 2004.

Opinion:
FULMER, Judge.
Albert Gray, Sr. appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction DNA testing filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853. Gray's motion is facially insufficient, therefore, we affirm the trial court's denial of the motion. See Saffold v. State, 850 So.2d 574 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Fla. R.Crim P. 3.850(b)(4). Our affirmance is without prejudice to any right Gray may have to file a facially sufficient motion within sixty days from the date of the issuance of the mandate in this case. See Burgess v. State, 862 So.2d 943 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).
Affirmed.
WHATLEY and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.