Case Name: John W. SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1993-11-09
Citations: 871 S.W.2d 1
Docket Number: No. 63356
Parties: John W. SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, C.J., and PUDLOWSKI and SIMON, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 871
Pages: 1–1

Head Matter:
John W. SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 63356.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Nov. 9, 1993.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Dec. 16, 1993.
Application to Transfer Denied March 22, 1994.
David C. Hemingway, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Millie Aulbur, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, C.J., and PUDLOWSKI and SIMON, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, John W. Scott, appeals from a denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing in the County of St. Louis. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. As we find that an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value, we affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b) and 30.25(b). A memorandum solely for the use of the parties here involved has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.