Case Name: Michael SHELLEY, Defendant/Respondent, v. ARROW MOTORS, INC., Third Party Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1997-11-11
Citations: 955 S.W.2d 805
Docket Number: No. 71368
Parties: Michael SHELLEY, Defendant/Respondent, v. ARROW MOTORS, INC., Third Party Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before CRANE, P.J., and RHODES RUSSELL and JAMES R. DOWD, Jr., JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 955
Pages: 805–805

Head Matter:
Michael SHELLEY, Defendant/Respondent, v. ARROW MOTORS, INC., Third Party Defendant/Appellant.
No. 71368.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Nov. 11, 1997.
William F. Whealen, Jr., Miller & Steeno, P.C., Clayton, for third party defendant/appellant.
James F. McMullin, Clayton, for defendant&61respondent.
Before CRANE, P.J., and RHODES RUSSELL and JAMES R. DOWD, Jr., JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict for plaintiff in a fraudulent misrepresentation case. There is sufficient evidence to support the jury verdict. No error of law appears.
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).