Case Name: Rounsaville v. Lamb
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1924-06-10
Citations: 32 Ga. App. 403
Docket Number: 15423
Parties: Rounsaville v. Lamb.
Judges: Broyles, G. J., and Lulce, J., concur.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 32
Pages: 403–403

Head Matter:
15423.
Rounsaville v. Lamb.
Decided June 10, 1924.
Action for damages; from Floyd superior court — Judge Wright. February 4, 1924.
Maddox, Matthews & Owens, for plaintiff in error.
Porter & Mehane, contra.

Opinion:
Bloodwobth, J.
1. When the excerpts from the charge of which complaint is made in the motion for a new trial are considered in connection with the remainder of the charge, there is no error in any of them that requires the grant of a new trial.
2. There is some evidence to support the finding of the jnry; no error of law appears to have been committed upon the trial of the case; and the verdict having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.
Judgment affirmed.
Broyles, G. J., and Lulce, J., concur.