Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Oscar L. YOUNG, Defendant/Appellant; Oscar L. YOUNG, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1993-11-23
Citations: 869 S.W.2d 169
Docket Number: Nos. 60312, 63501
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Oscar L. YOUNG, Defendant/Appellant. Oscar L. YOUNG, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 869
Pages: 169–169

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Oscar L. YOUNG, Defendant/Appellant. Oscar L. YOUNG, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Nos. 60312, 63501.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Nov. 23, 1993.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Dec. 29, 1993.
Application to Transfer Denied Feb. 22, 1994.
Robin Ransom, Asst. Public Defender, Clayton, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jennifer A. Glancy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals his conviction, by a jury, of second degree assault, § 565.060, RSMo 1986, and armed criminal action, § 571.015.1, RSMo 1986. He was sentenced, in accordance with the jury's verdict on punishment, to two consecutive three year prison terms. He also appeals the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief.
We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. A written opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. Rule 30.25(b); Rule 84.16(b).