Case Name: TRIMBLE v. DANAHAR
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1908-02-07
Citations: 108 N.Y.S. 657
Docket Number: 
Parties: TRIMBLE v. DANAHAR.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 108
Pages: 657–657

Head Matter:
TRIMBLE v. DANAHAR.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
February 7, 1908.)
Landlord and Tenant—Deposit to Secure Rent—Right oe Lessee to Deposit.
Where a lessee deposits $116.67 as security for the rent for the last month of the term, to be forfeited upon failure to comply with any of the covenants of the lease, and he is subsequently dispossessed, and the lessor leases the premises for the balance of the term at a loss to him of $16.66, the lessee is entitled to the balance of his deposit.
[Ed. Note.—For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 32, Landlord and Tenant, § 747.]
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Eighth District.
Action by Joseph Trimble against John A. Danahar. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals. Reversed, and new trial ordered.
Argued before GIEDERSLEEVE, P. J., and SEABURY and GERARD, JJ.
Robert Lyon, for appellant.
James F. Higgins, for respondent

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The plaintiff sued to recover $116.67, which he deposited with the defendant under a- lease which provided that this sum should be applied to the payment of the rent of the last month of the term, but that "the same to be forfeited upon failure to comply with any of the within covenants." The plaintiff was dispossessed, and the defendant leased the premises for the balance of the term at a loss to him of $16.66. Upon the facts proved the plaintiff was entitled to judgment for the sum of $100.01, and judgment for the defendant was improperly entered.
Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.