Case Name: Byron L. EAST, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2009-12-22
Citations: 298 S.W.3d 930
Docket Number: No. WD 69829
Parties: Byron L. EAST, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Division Two: JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Presiding Judge, VICTOR C. HOWARD, Judge and JAMES E. WELSH, Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 298
Pages: 930–930

Head Matter:
Byron L. EAST, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 69829.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Dec. 22, 2009.
Byron L. East, pro se.
Jayne T. Woods, for Respondent.
Before Division Two: JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Presiding Judge, VICTOR C. HOWARD, Judge and JAMES E. WELSH, Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Byron East appeals from the denial of his motion to reopen his Rule 29.15 post-conviction proceedings in which he claimed that he was abandoned by post-conviction counsel, that post-conviction counsel had a conflict of interest, and that the motion court improperly failed to conduct an evi-dentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).