Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Maxwell JOHNSON, Defendant/Appellant; Maxwell JOHNSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1991-08-27
Citations: 813 S.W.2d 392
Docket Number: Nos. 54990, 58944
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Maxwell JOHNSON, Defendant/Appellant. Maxwell JOHNSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 813
Pages: 392–392

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Maxwell JOHNSON, Defendant/Appellant. Maxwell JOHNSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Nos. 54990, 58944.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Aug. 27, 1991.
Judith C. LaRose, Janet M. Thompson, Columbia, for defendant/appellant.
William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., John P. Pollard, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff/respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of second degree burglary, § 570.030, RSMo 1986, and felony stealing, § 570.030, RSMo 1986, for which he was sentenced as a persistent offender to a term of ten years on each charge to be served consecutively and appeals from the denial of his 29.15 motion. We affirm.
The findings and conclusions of the trial court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgments pursuant to Rule 30.25(b) and Rule 84.16(b).