Case Name: In re ESTATE of Samuel FRIEDMAN, Deceased
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1966-11-01
Citations: 191 So. 2d 310
Docket Number: No. 66-53
Parties: In re ESTATE of Samuel FRIEDMAN, Deceased.
Judges: Before HENDRY, C. J., and PEARSON and CARROLL, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 191
Pages: 310–311

Head Matter:
In re ESTATE of Samuel FRIEDMAN, Deceased.
No. 66-53.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
Nov. 1, 1966.
Kessler, Massey & Beckerman, Coral Gables, for appellant.
Greene, Rodenberg & Layne, Miami, for appellee.
Before HENDRY, C. J., and PEARSON and CARROLL, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By this appeal a legatee who was. a daughter of the decedent seeks reversal of an order of the county judge's court of Dade County denying her petition for- revocation of probate of the decedent's will. The contention presented by the appellant is that the will was not properly executed. The findings of the county judge that the will was properly signed by the testator, attested and published, are amply supported by the evidence. Under the established rule that such a decision of a probate court will not be disturbed on appeal unless the legal effect of the evidence has been misapprehended or there is a lack of evidence to support the findings, we conclude that no reversible error has been made to appear. See Gair v. Lockhart, Fla. 1950, 45 So.2d 193; Skelton v. Davis, Fla.App.1961, 133 So.2d 432, 89 A.L.R.2d 1114; In re Winans' Estate, Fla.App.1961, 133 So.2d 473.
Accordingly, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
Affirmed.