Case Name: Lloyd WHITE, Petitioner, v. BAY DREDGING & CONSTRUCTION CO. et al., Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1968-12-16
Citations: 216 So. 2d 436
Docket Number: No. 37912
Parties: Lloyd WHITE, Petitioner, v. BAY DREDGING & CONSTRUCTION CO. et al., Respondents.
Judges: CALDWELL, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 216
Pages: 436–436

Head Matter:
Lloyd WHITE, Petitioner, v. BAY DREDGING & CONSTRUCTION CO. et al., Respondents.
No. 37912.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Dec. 16, 1968.
Leon H. Brush, of Crabtree, Brush, Sy-prett & Meshad, Sarasota, for petitioner.
John J. O’Riorden, of Dart, Bell & Dickinson, Sarasota, Patrick H. Mears and J. Franklin Garner, Tallahassee, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date September 13, 1968.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
CALDWELL, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.