Case Name: Otto Venino, Jr., appellant, v. August Naegele et al., respondents
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1926-10-27
Citations: 100 N.J. Eq. 357
Docket Number: 
Parties: Otto Venino, Jr., appellant, v. August Naegele et al., respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 100
Pages: 357–357

Head Matter:
Otto Venino, Jr., appellant, v. August Naegele et al., respondents.
[Decided October 27th, 1926.]
Mr. J. Emil Walscheid, for the appellant.
Mr. Robert Carey, for the respondents.

Opinion:
Pee Cubiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.
For affirmance — The Ohiee-Justice, Tbehchaed, Pae-KEE, MlHTUBH, KaLISCH, ¿LACK, KaTZEHBACH, CAMPBELL, Lloyd, White, Gabdheb, Yah Buskiek, McGlehhoh, Kays, Hetpield, JJ. 15.
For reversal — -None.