Case Name: Richard D. GRAY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1993-10-19
Citations: 863 S.W.2d 21
Docket Number: No. 63393
Parties: Richard D. GRAY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 863
Pages: 21–21

Head Matter:
Richard D. GRAY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent.
No. 63393.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Oct. 19, 1993.
Lew Kollias, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84-16(b).