Case Name: BOATMEN'S CREDIT CARD BANK, d/b/a Mastercard and Visa, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. William O. SCHWEITZER, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1996-08-27
Citations: 931 S.W.2d 881
Docket Number: No. 69493
Parties: BOATMEN’S CREDIT CARD BANK, d/b/a Mastercard and Visa, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. William O. SCHWEITZER, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 931
Pages: 881–881

Head Matter:
BOATMEN’S CREDIT CARD BANK, d/b/a Mastercard and Visa, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. William O. SCHWEITZER, Defendant/Appellant.
No. 69493.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Aug. 27, 1996.
Rehearing Denied Oct. 29, 1996.
William 0. Schweitzer, St. Louis, pro se, defendani/appellant.
William F. Whealen, Jr., Miller & Steeno, P.C., Clayton, for plaintiff/respondent.
Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals from a judgment for plaintiff for $9,433.19. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).