Case Name: Willie F. ALLEN, d/b/a Willie F. Allen Janitorial Service, Appellant, v. GREENVILLE COUNTY, a Political Subdivision, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1983-07-26
Citations: 712 F.2d 934
Docket Number: No. 82-1798
Parties: Willie F. ALLEN, d/b/a Willie F. Allen Janitorial Service, Appellant, v. GREENVILLE COUNTY, a Political Subdivision, Appellee.
Judges: Before HALL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges and BRYAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 712
Pages: 934–936

Head Matter:
Willie F. ALLEN, d/b/a Willie F. Allen Janitorial Service, Appellant, v. GREENVILLE COUNTY, a Political Subdivision, Appellee.
No. 82-1798.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Argued April 15, 1983.
Decided July 26, 1983.
Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied Oct. 18,1983.
Theo Walker Mitchell, Greenville, S.C. (Fletcher N. Smith, Jr., Columbia, S.C., on brief), for appellant.
Charles Richard Stewart and Joseph H. Earle, Jr., Greenville, S.C., for appellee.
Before HALL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges and BRYAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
ALBERT V. BRYAN, Senior Circuit Judge:
Appellant Willie F. Allen contracted with Greenville County, South Carolina to provide janitorial services for certain County buildings for a twelve month period at a stated consideration of $126,000.00. The agreement was terminable at will by either party upon 10 days written notice. He began performance and continued until the County exercised its right of termination and accordingly notified Allen of its intention to bring the contract to a close.
On October 30,1980 in the Court of Common Pleas of Greenville County, Allen sued the County for breach of the agreement. He pleaded the contract and his full performance of it and the County's enlargement of Allen's obligations beyond the terms of the contract. Additionally, he alleged precontract misrepresentation by the County of the extent and volume of work involved as well as the injustice by the County. Trial of the action resulted in a directed verdict for the County. Allen did not appeal.
In May 1982 Allen sued the County in the United States District Court for South Carolina asserting that the contract had been brought to an end for racially discriminatory reasons, in violation of his civil rights guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States and remediable under the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 1981, 1982, 1983 and 1988.
Upon due hearing the Court ruled that the doctrine of res judicata barred Allen from litigating under section 1983 because the claim clearly could have been raised in Allen's earlier State court action. The action was then dismissed with prejudice and this appeal followed.
We conclude that the District Court's dismissal was plainly right. There was but a single cause of action — the termination of the agreement. The sole injury for which Allen sought compensation was the allegedly wrongful termination of the contract. The State court had, however, determined that the termination was proper and pursuant to the contract terms. Its judgment of the merits is a finality as to the claim in controversy and forecloses further litigation.
AFFIRMED.
. D/b/a Willie F. Allen Janitorial Service.