Case Name: Dominick Concolino, an Infant, etc., Respondent, v. Carl G. Kunzelman, Respondent, and Thomas Dixon, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1931-10
Citations: 234 A.D. 729
Docket Number: 
Parties: Dominick Concolino, an Infant, etc., Respondent, v. Carl G. Kunzelman, Respondent, and Thomas Dixon, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 234
Pages: 729–730

Head Matter:
Dominick Concolino, an Infant, etc., Respondent, v. Carl G. Kunzelman, Respondent, and Thomas Dixon, Appellant.

Opinion:
Judgment and order reversed on the law and facts, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs, on the ground that plaintiff's disobedience of the provisions of section 88, subdivision 3, of the Vehicle and Trafile Law was negligence as matter of law contributing to the accident, and in any event the verdict exonerating the plaintiff from contributory negligence was in this respect against the weight of the evidence. All concur. Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Taylor, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.