Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Steve RATCLIFF, Appellant; Steve RATCLIFF, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1996-06-18
Citations: 924 S.W.2d 59
Docket Number: Nos. 63570, 69392
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Steve RATCLIFF, Appellant. Steve RATCLIFF, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANE, C.J., AHRENS, J., and CHARLES B. BLACKMAR, Senior Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 924
Pages: 59–60

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Steve RATCLIFF, Appellant. Steve RATCLIFF, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 63570, 69392.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
June 18, 1996.
Ellen H. Flottman, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Christine M. Blegen, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before CRANE, C.J., AHRENS, J., and CHARLES B. BLACKMAR, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant Steven Ratcliff appeals the judgment entered upon his conviction by a jury of five counts of sexual assault in the first degree. § 566.040 RSMo (Supp.1990). Defendant also appeals his denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Both of the appeals have been consolidated for review pursuant to Rule 29.15(e). We affirm both judgments.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgments of the trial court and motion court are affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).