Case Name: FLORENCE KINSEY, Appellant, v. SHERIFF, CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada
Jurisdiction: Nevada
Decision Date: 1978-09-15
Citations: 94 Nev. 596
Docket Number: No. 10955
Parties: FLORENCE KINSEY, Appellant, v. SHERIFF, CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Nevada Reports
Volume: 94
Pages: 596–597

Head Matter:
FLORENCE KINSEY, Appellant, v. SHERIFF, CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA, Respondent.
No. 10955
September 15, 1978
584 P.2d 158
Jeffrey D. Sobel, Las Vegas, for Appellant.
Robert List, Attorney General, Carson City; George E. Holt, District Attorney, and Geraldine Zucker, Deputy, Clark County, for Respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION
Per Curiam:
This is an appeal from an order denying a pretrial habeas corpus challenge to a justice court's order denying Florence Kinsey's motion for the production of certain records.
There is no provision in the habeas corpus statutes (NRS 34.360-NRS 34.680) which permits a pretrial challenge to an order denying a motion for discovery. Neither is there a provision for interlocutory appellate review of such orders. Therefore, the habeas petition was not cognizable in the district court. Accordingly, we vacate the district court's order and remand this case with instructions to dismiss the petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Cf. Sheriff v. Toston, 93 Nev. 394, 566 P.2d 411 (1977).
Cf. Franklin v. District Court, 85 Nev. 401, 455 P.2d 919 (1969), where this court ruled that appellate review of such orders is postponed until entry of a final judgment of conviction.