Case Name: THEODORE MULLEN, RESPONDENT, v. CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1932-10-17
Citations: 109 N.J.L. 414
Docket Number: 
Parties: THEODORE MULLEN, RESPONDENT, v. CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 109
Pages: 414–414

Head Matter:
THEODORE MULLEN, RESPONDENT, v. CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLANT.
Submitted May 27, 1932 —
Decided October 17, 1932.
For the appellant, De Voe Tomlinson.
For the respondent, Samuel J. Marantz and Francis A. Gordon.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the per curiam opinion of the Supreme Court.
That opinion does not specifically discuss all the grounds of appeal, but we have examined them all and conclude that no harmful error is pointed out by any of them. It is doubtful whether the exceptions to the charge are adequate, but waiving this, we can find no injurious error. The phrase "into the roundhouse" in the part of the charge quoted' in the fourth ground of appeal, was of course inaccurate and without support in the evidence, but absolutely immaterial to the issue in the case, which it could not possibly have affected in any way.
For affirmance — Trenchard, Parker, Case, Donges, Brogan, Yan Buskirk, Kays, Dear, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.