Case Name: GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. v. ALLIS-CHALMERS CO. et al.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1912-02-06
Citations: 194 F. 413
Docket Number: No. 1,518
Parties: GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. v. ALLIS-CHALMERS CO. et al.
Judges: Before GRAY, BUFFINGTON, and LANNING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter
Volume: 194
Pages: 413–414

Head Matter:
GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. v. ALLIS-CHALMERS CO. et al.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
February 6, 1912.)
No. 1,518.
Akkeat, ahd Error (§ 79 ) — Appealabi.e Orders--Dismissal as to One Defendant.
An appeal will not, lie from an order dismissing a bill as to one of two defendants prior to the rendition of final decree in the cause.
[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Appeal and Error, Cent. Dig'. §§ 484-493; Dec. Dig. § 79. J
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey.
Suit in equity by the General Electric Company against the Allis-Chalmers Company and others. From the judgment of dismissal (190 Fed. 145) as to certain defendants, complainant appeals, and defendants move to dismiss appeal.
Motion sustained.
See, also, 194 Fed. 414.
Edwards, Sager & Wooster, for Allis-Chalmers Co.
Betts, Sheffield, Bentley & Betts, for General Electric Co.
Before GRAY, BUFFINGTON, and LANNING, Circuit Judges.
For other cases see same topic & § number in Dec, &, Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep’r Indexes

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is a motion to dismiss the appeal of the General Electric Company from that part of the decree of the conn below which dismissed the hill as to the Bullock Electric Manufacturing Company of New Jersey. Such motion is based on the ground that no filial decree has been entered in the cause. After argument and due consideration had, the motion is granted, on the an- thority of Hohorst v. Hamburg Co., 148 U. S. 262, 13 Sup. Ct. 590, 37 L. Ed. 443, and Ex parte National Enameling Co., 201 U. S. 158, 26 Sup. Ct. 404, 50 L. Ed. 707.