Case Name: Arnold D. HINKLE, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Annette M. HINKLE, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1997-04-29
Citations: 945 S.W.2d 43
Docket Number: No. 70456
Parties: Arnold D. HINKLE, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Annette M. HINKLE, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before CRAHAN, P.J., and GRIMM and HOFF, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 945
Pages: 43–44

Head Matter:
Arnold D. HINKLE, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Annette M. HINKLE, Respondent/Respondent.
No. 70456.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
April 29, 1997.
Nadine V. Nunn, St. Louis, for petitioner/appellant.
David S. Fischer, St. Louis, for respondent/respondent.
Before CRAHAN, P.J., and GRIMM and HOFF, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
In this dissolution proceeding, husband raises five points on appeal. Among other things, he contends the trial court erred in denying his oral motion for continuance and granting custody of their child to wife.
We have examined the record and briefs. The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An opinion would have no prece-dential value. Rule 84.16(b).
The trial court's judgment is affirmed.