Case Name: Randy ORTEGA, Appellee v. Peter Victor AYIKA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-02-06
Citations: 459 F. App'x 468
Docket Number: No. 10-50877
Parties: Randy ORTEGA, Appellee v. Peter Victor AYIKA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WIENER, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 459
Pages: 468–469

Head Matter:
Randy ORTEGA, Appellee v. Peter Victor AYIKA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-50877
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Feb. 6, 2012.
Louis Elias Lopez, Jr., Esq., Law Office of Louis E. Lopez, El Paso, TX, for Appel-lee.
Randy Ortega, Ellis & Ortega, El Paso, TX, pro se.
Leon Schydlower, El Paso, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before WIENER, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Defendant-Appellant Peter Victor Ayika appeals the district court's order denying him a return of a portion of attorney's fees he paid to his former counsel, Randy Ortega. As we lack jurisdiction, we dismiss the appeal.
The ruling in this case is appealable only if it meets the requirements of the collateral order doctrine. See Flanagan v. United States, 465 U.S. 259, 263-64, 104 S.Ct. 1051, 79 L.Ed.2d 288 (1984). We conclude that the order denying return of attorney's fees is not effectively unreviewable on appeal from a final judgment, and Ayika has made no showing to the contrary. See id. at 266-67, 104 S.Ct. 1051; Shipes v. Trinity Indus., Inc., 883 F.2d 339, 344 (5th Cir.1989). We do not reach Ortega's alternative argument that the appeal should be dismissed as untimely.
The appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.