Case Name: Anthony BRYANT, Petitioner, v. James R. McDONOUGH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2006-05-31
Citations: 932 So. 2d 449
Docket Number: No. 1D06-1449
Parties: Anthony BRYANT, Petitioner, v. James R. McDONOUGH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Respondent.
Judges: ALLEN, WEBSTER, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 932
Pages: 449–449

Head Matter:
Anthony BRYANT, Petitioner, v. James R. McDONOUGH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Respondent.
No. 1D06-1449.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
May 31, 2006.
Rehearing Denied July 6, 2006.
Anthony Bryant, pro se, Petitioner.
Charlie Crist, Attorney General, and Warren James Pearson, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of mandamus/prohibition is denied on the merits. To the extent the petition can be interpreted as seeking certiorari review of certain interlocutory orders of the circuit court, we decline to undertake such review since petitioner will have an adequate remedy by way of appeal following the entry of a final order. See generally Noack v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., 872 So.2d 370 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). Finally, we deny petitioner's request that we undertake review of the order granting him leave to proceed as an indigent in the circuit court, again without prejudice to his right to seek review on plenary appeal. See LaMadline v. Crosby, 867 So.2d 552 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).
ALLEN, WEBSTER, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.