Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Willie DEAN, Defendant/Appellant; Willie DEAN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1993-11-09
Citations: 864 S.W.2d 434
Docket Number: Nos. 62101 & 63557
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Willie DEAN, Defendant/Appellant. Willie DEAN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANDALL, P.J. and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 864
Pages: 434–434

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Willie DEAN, Defendant/Appellant. Willie DEAN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Nos. 62101 & 63557.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Nov. 9, 1993.
Randy Knopf, Asst. Public Defender, Clayton, for movant/appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent/respondent.
Before CRANDALL, P.J. and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals his conviction, by a jury, of stealing over $150.00, § 570.030.3(1), RSMo 1986. He was sentenced by the court as a prior and persistent offender to a thirteen year prison term. He also appeals the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.
We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).