Case Name: STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. WILLIAM GEORGE CURRIER, JR., Defendant
Court: Montana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Montana
Decision Date: 1992-04-23
Citations: 256 Mont. 9
Docket Number: NO. DC-91-206A
Parties: STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. WILLIAM GEORGE CURRIER, JR., Defendant.
Judges: Hon. Ed McLean, Chairman, Hon. Thomas M. McKittrick, Hon. G. Todd Baugh, Judges
Reporter: Montana Reports
Volume: 256
Pages: 9–10

Head Matter:
STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. WILLIAM GEORGE CURRIER, JR., Defendant.
NO. DC-91-206A
DECISION
DATED this 23rd day of April, 1992.

Opinion:
On January 22, 1992 the Defendant was sentenced to ten (10) years for Issuing a had check. He is given credit for 18 days time served.
On April 23,1992, the Defendant's application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
The Defendant was present and was represented by Steven Gannon, Legal Intern from the Montana Defender Project. The state was not represented.
Before hearing the application, the Defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also to increase it if such is possible. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.
After careful consideration, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed with one condition added. The Defendant shall be required to obtain an evaluation for sexual abuse and to obtain counseling if deemed necessary.
The reason for the decision is that it has been brought to the attention of this Court, by defendant's counsel, that the defendant was sexually abused as a child and the Sentence Review Board finds this could partly be responsible for defendant's actions as a young adult. The remaining sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct pursuant to Section 46-18-904(3), MCA. The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to deem inadequate or excessive as required to overcome the presumption per Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
Hon. Ed McLean, Chairman, Hon. Thomas M. McKittrick, Hon. G. Todd Baugh, Judges
The Sentence Review Board wishes to thank Steve Gannon, Legal Intern from the Montana Defender Project for his assistance to the defendant and to this Court.