Case Name: Luz MICHAILOWSKI, Appellant, v. Thomas McVICKER, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2007-06-22
Citations: 958 So. 2d 584
Docket Number: No. 5D06-1290
Parties: Luz MICHAILOWSKI, Appellant, v. Thomas McVICKER, Appellee.
Judges: PLEUS, C.J. and LAWSON, J., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 958
Pages: 584–585

Head Matter:
Luz MICHAILOWSKI, Appellant, v. Thomas McVICKER, Appellee.
No. 5D06-1290.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
June 22, 2007.
Luz Michailowski, Weeki Wachee, pro se.
James R. Jones, Jr., Spring Hill, for Appellee.

Opinion:
GRIFFIN, J.
We find no error in the trial court's finding of contempt for appellant's failure to comply with the final judgment. We agree with appellant, however, that the portion of the order awarding attorney's fees was error because there are no findings in the order to support the basis for entitlement or the amount. See, e.g., Beck v. Beck, 852 So.2d 934 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Saporito v. Saporito, 831 So.2d 697 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); Maas v. Maas, 541 So.2d 160 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.
PLEUS, C.J. and LAWSON, J., concur.