Case Name: In the Matter of N. M., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. N. M., Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2009-12-16
Citations: 232 Or. App. 561
Docket Number: MC090008; A141644
Parties: In the Matter of N. M., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. N. M., Appellant.
Judges: Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Schuman, Judge, and Ortega, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 232
Pages: 561–562

Head Matter:
Submitted October 2,
reversed December 16, 2009
In the Matter of N. M., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. N. M., Appellant.
Umatilla County Circuit Court
MC090008; A141644
222 P3d 48
Kent A. Anderson filed the brief for appellant.
John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Jerome Lidz, Solicitor General, and Pamela J. Walsh, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Schuman, Judge, and Ortega, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
In this mental commitment case, appellant contends that, among other things, the evidence was insufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that, at the time of the hearing, he suffered from a mental disorder that caused him to be a danger to himself or to others. ORS 426.130(1). The state concedes that the evidence is not sufficient. On de novo review, State v. O'Neill, 274 Or 59, 61, 545 P2d 97 (1976), we agree that the evidence is insufficient.
Reversed.