Case Name: Paul Thorson, Appellant, v. New York City Transit Authority, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2003-05-27
Citations: 305 A.D.2d 666
Docket Number: 
Parties: Paul Thorson, Appellant, v New York City Transit Authority, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 305
Pages: 666–667

Head Matter:
Paul Thorson, Appellant, v New York City Transit Authority, Respondent.
[759 NYS2d 880]

Opinion:
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated June 3, 2002, which denied his motion to quash a subpoena issued to a nonparty, Juan Cortes, directing him to appear for a deposition.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiff's motion to quash the subpoena issued to Juan Cortes. The defendant demonstrated that Cortes has information that is material and necessary to the defense of this action (see CPLR 3101 [a] [4]), and that this information is otherwise unobtainable (see O'Neill v Oakgrove Constr., 71 NY2d 521, 526 [1988]; Abbadessa v Sprint, 291 AD2d 363 [2002]; Bostrom v William Penn Life Ins. Co. of N.Y., 285 AD2d 482 [2001]; Maxwell v Snapper, Inc., 249 AD2d 374 [1998]; Dioguardi v St. John's Riverside Hosp., 144 AD2d 333 [1988]). Florio, J.P., S. Miller, Friedmann, Adams and Rivera, JJ., concur.