Case Name: HARTMAN et al. v. CADDINGTON
Court: Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jurisdiction: Maryland
Decision Date: 1969-11-20
Citations: 255 Md. 651
Docket Number: No. 106
Parties: HARTMAN et al. v. CADDINGTON
Judges: The cause was argued before Hammond, C. J., and Barnes, Finan, Singley and Smith, JJ.
Reporter: Maryland Reports
Volume: 255
Pages: 651–651

Head Matter:
HARTMAN et al. v. CADDINGTON
[No. 106,
September Term, 1969.]
Decided November 20, 1969.
The cause was argued before Hammond, C. J., and Barnes, Finan, Singley and Smith, JJ.
Robert E. Bullard for appellants.
Frank W. Wilson for appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The appeal must be dismissed because there was no final judgment below from which an appeal could be taken. After a jury verdict, appellants filed a motion for judgment n.o.v. or in the alternative a new trial and the trial court granted a new trial.
Appeal dismissed with costs.