Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher WALKER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-05-05
Citations: 325 F. App'x 163
Docket Number: No. 09-6040
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Christopher WALKER, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 325
Pages: 163–164

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Christopher WALKER, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 09-6040.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 23, 2009.
Decided: May 5, 2009.
Christopher Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Sara Elizabeth Chase, Joan Elizabeth Evans, Norval George Metcalf, Assistant United States Attorneys, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Walker appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Walker, No. 3:96-cr-00123-REP-2 (E.D.Va. Dec. 8, 2008); see also United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir.2009). We further deny Walker's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.