Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Nico RUIZ-GONZALES, also known as Nico Ruiz, also known as Nico Ruiz Gonzales, also known as Jorge Rayes, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-10-20
Citations: 333 F. App'x 881
Docket Number: No. 09-20110
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Nico RUIZ-GONZALES, also known as Nico Ruiz, also known as Nico Ruiz Gonzales, also known as Jorge Rayes, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. ■
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 333
Pages: 881–881

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Nico RUIZ-GONZALES, also known as Nico Ruiz, also known as Nico Ruiz Gonzales, also known as Jorge Rayes, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-20110
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Oct. 20, 2009.
James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Sarah Beth Landau, Laura Fletcher Leavitt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for D efendant-App ellant.
Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. ■

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Nico Ruiz-Gonzales has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Ruiz-Gonzales has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel's brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th CiR. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.