Case Name: Rudolph BROWD et al., Appellants, v. CENTRAL BANK OF NORTH DADE, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1978-03-07
Citations: 356 So. 2d 1273
Docket Number: Nos. 77-282 and 77-489
Parties: Rudolph BROWD et al., Appellants, v. CENTRAL BANK OF NORTH DADE, Appellee.
Judges: Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and NATHAN and HUBBART, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 356
Pages: 1273–1274

Head Matter:
Rudolph BROWD et al., Appellants, v. CENTRAL BANK OF NORTH DADE, Appellee.
Nos. 77-282 and 77-489.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 7, 1978.
Rehearing Denied April 21, 1978.
McCain & Browd, Miami, for appellants.
Pallot, Poppell, Goodman & Slotnick and Neil A. Shanzer, Miami, for appellee.
Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and NATHAN and HUBBART, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The final summary judgment appealed from is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings. In our view, affidavits presented to the trial court on the motion for summary judgment create a genuine issue of material fact as to whether novation occurred in this case. Murphy v. Green, 102 Fla. 102, 135 So. 531 (1931); Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); Amoedo v. Socarras, 311 So.2d 830 (Fla.3d DCA 1975).