Case Name: THE STATE, THE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY, THE NEWARK SAVINGS INSTITUTION, AND WARREN A. TRUESDELL AND JOHN LEE, PROSECUTORS, v. THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWARK; THE STATE, MATILDA CRANE, SARAH MARIA CRANE, JOHN B. VAN WAGENER, AND CAROLINE M. VAN WAGENER, HIS WIFE, PROSECUTORS, v. THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWARK; THE STATE, ALFRED L. DENNIS, MANNING DANIELS, URIAH J. SMITH, AND URIAH J. SMITH AND SAMUEL L. MITCHELL, EXECUTORS OF CORNELIUS SMITH, DEC'D, PROSECUTORS, v. THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWARK
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1871-06
Citations: 35 N.J.L. 177
Docket Number: 
Parties: THE STATE, THE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY, THE NEWARK SAVINGS INSTITUTION, AND WARREN A. TRUESDELL AND JOHN LEE, PROSECUTORS, v. THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWARK. THE STATE, MATILDA CRANE, SARAH MARIA CRANE, JOHN B. VAN WAGENER, AND CAROLINE M. VAN WAGENER, HIS WIFE, PROSECUTORS, v. THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWARK. THE STATE, ALFRED L. DENNIS, MANNING DANIELS, URIAH J. SMITH, AND URIAH J. SMITH AND SAMUEL L. MITCHELL, EXECUTORS OF CORNELIUS SMITH, DEC’D, PROSECUTORS, v. THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWARK.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 35
Pages: 177–178

Head Matter:
THE STATE, THE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY, THE NEWARK SAVINGS INSTITUTION, AND WARREN A. TRUESDELL AND JOHN LEE, PROSECUTORS, v. THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWARK. THE STATE, MATILDA CRANE, SARAH MARIA CRANE, JOHN B. VAN WAGENER, AND CAROLINE M. VAN WAGENER, HIS WIFE, PROSECUTORS, v. THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWARK. THE STATE, ALFRED L. DENNIS, MANNING DANIELS, URIAH J. SMITH, AND URIAH J. SMITH AND SAMUEL L. MITCHELL, EXECUTORS OF CORNELIUS SMITH, DEC’D, PROSECUTORS, v. THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWARK.

Opinion:
The above-mentioned writs were prosecuted to remove assessments against the several parties named therein, and presented and argued upon the same statement of facts, the parties agreeing to abide the judgment of the court in the foregoing case.
Assessments affirmed