Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Aaron Scott PRUETT, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-01-09
Citations: 708 F. App'x 472
Docket Number: No. 16-56858
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Aaron Scott PRUETT, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: GRABER, MURGUIA, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 708
Pages: 472–472

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Aaron Scott PRUETT, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-56858
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Filed January 9, 2018
D.C. Nos. 3:16-cv-01561-CAB 3:96-cr-00331-CAB-l, Southern District of California, San Diego
Lawrence E. Spong, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Helen H. Hong, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the US Attorney, San Diego, CA, Plaintiff-Appellee
Kara Hartzler, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant
Before: GRABER, MURGUIA, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
The separate concurrence to the memorandum disposition filed November 30, 2017, is amended as follows:
On page 2, line 17 of the concurrence, change "In sum, even if we assume" to "Even if we assume"; on page 3, at the end of line 5 of the concurrence, add the citation: "Beckles v. United States, — U.S. -, 137 S.Ct. 886, 897-98, 197 L.Ed.2d 145 (Ginsburg, J., concurring)."
With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny Appellant's petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc.
The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and' no judge of the court has requested a vote on it.
, Appellant's petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc is DENIED.
No further petitions for panel rehearing or for rehearing en banc may be filed.