Case Name: Thomas ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James ANDERSON; Patricia Anderson, Defendants. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Proposed Intervenor-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-06-14
Citations: 40 F. App'x 502
Docket Number: No. 01-15815; D.C. No. CV-98-00744-DWH/RAM
Parties: Thomas ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James ANDERSON; Patricia Anderson, Defendants. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Proposed Intervenor-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 40
Pages: 502–503

Head Matter:
Thomas ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James ANDERSON; Patricia Anderson, Defendants. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Proposed Intervenor-Appellant.
No. 01-15815.
D.C. No. CV-98-00744-DWH/RAM.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 10, 2002.
Decided June 14, 2002.
Before O’SCANNLAIN, BERZON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company appeals the district court's order denying its motion to intervene as a defendant in this diversity action. We dismiss the appeal.
In a separate memorandum issued this day in appeal No. 01-15537, we affirmed the district court's dismissal of the under lying action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Accordingly, this appeal is moot.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.