Case Name: James Devon POWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Joseph Brooks, Warden, FCI Petersburg, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-08-18
Citations: 104 F. App'x 369
Docket Number: No. 04-6576
Parties: James Devon POWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Joseph Brooks, Warden, FCI Petersburg, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 104
Pages: 369–370

Head Matter:
James Devon POWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Joseph Brooks, Warden, FCI Petersburg, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 04-6576.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 12, 2004.
Decided: Aug. 18, 2004.
James Devon Powell, Appellant pro se.
Paul Joseph McNulty, United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
James Devon Powell appeals the district court's order denying his motion to restrain or enjoin prison officials from collecting court-ordered restitution and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Powell v. United States, No. CA-04-37-2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 8, 2004 & Mar. 24, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED