Case Name: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. BERTRAM MARRINER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1920-10-15
Citations: 95 N.J.L. 265
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. BERTRAM MARRINER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Judges: For affirmance — Swayze, TeeNohaed, Paeiíee, BeegeN, Kalisoh, White, HeppeNheiMee, WiluiaMs, Tayloe, GARDNER, AOKERSON, JJ. 11.
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 95
Pages: 265–265

Head Matter:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. BERTRAM MARRINER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Submitted July 5, 1920
Decided October 15, 1920.
On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 93 N. J. L. 273.
For the defendant in error, Charles F. Sexton.
For the plaintiff in error, Ward Kremer.

Opinion:
PER CueiaM.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Chief Justice in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Swayze, TeeNohaed, Paeiíee, BeegeN, Kalisoh, White, HeppeNheiMee, WiluiaMs, Tayloe, GARDNER, AOKERSON, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.