Case Name: Ladell SPANN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1976-11-12
Citations: 339 So. 2d 275
Docket Number: No. 75-1084
Parties: Ladell SPANN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: McNULTY, C. J., and BOARDMAN and SCHEB, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 339
Pages: 275–275

Head Matter:
Ladell SPANN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 75-1084.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Nov. 12, 1976.
Rehearing Denied Dec. 9, 1976.
Jack 0. Johnson, Public Defender, and Steven H. Denman, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Mary Jo M. Gallay, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The only meritorious point raised on appeal is whether the testimony by a state's witness that appellant did not make a statement to the police officer after he was advised of his rights constituted fundamental error. There was no objection to the testimony at trial. On the basis of Clark v. State, 386 So.2d 468 (Fla.2d D.C.A.1976), we hold that it was not fundamental error.
AFFIRMED.
McNULTY, C. J., and BOARDMAN and SCHEB, JJ., concur.