Case Name: The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, vs. Stanislaus Przybysh, Plaintiff in Error
Court: Illinois Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Illinois
Decision Date: 1936-02-14
Citations: 362 Ill. 526
Docket Number: No. 23058
Parties: The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, vs. Stanislaus Przybysh, Plaintiff in Error.
Judges: 
Reporter: Illinois Reports
Volume: 362
Pages: 526–527

Head Matter:
(No. 23058.
The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, vs. Stanislaus Przybysh, Plaintiff in Error.
Opinion filed February 14, 1936.
A. E. Gettys, for plaintiff in error.
Otto Kerner, Attorney General, and A. B. Dennis, for the People.

Opinion:
Mr. Justice Herrick
delivered the opinion of the court:
Stanislaus Przybysh, the defendant, was, on a trial without a jury in the criminal court of Cook county, found guilty of embezzlement and sentenced to the penitentiary. He brings the case here by writ of error.
The defendant contends that the evidence does not support the judgment and that the alleged crime was barfed by the Statute of Limitations. On the motion of the People made in this court the purported bill of exceptions was stricken from the transcript of the record.
Before this court can review the question of the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the judgment of conviction or whether the prosecution for the alleged offense was in fact barred by the Statute of Limitations, the evidence must all be included in a bill of exceptions. (People v. Buckman, 357 Ill. 407.) The facts on which the ques tions are argued here have not been properly preserved, and we are without jurisdiction to review the evidence.
The judgment of the criminal court of Cook county is therefore affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.