Case Name: Kurt M. BOHONSKY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2017-08-29
Citations: 527 S.W.3d 126
Docket Number: WD 79969
Parties: Kurt M. BOHONSKY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Division One: James E. Welsh, Presiding Judge, Lisa White Hardwick and Gary D. Witt, Judges
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 527
Pages: 126–126

Head Matter:
Kurt M. BOHONSKY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
WD 79969
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Filed: August 29, 2017
Margaret M. Johnston and Casey A. Taylor, Assistant Public Defenders, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.
Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, and Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before Division One: James E. Welsh, Presiding Judge, Lisa White Hardwick and Gary D. Witt, Judges

Opinion:
Order
Per Curiam
Kurt Bohonsky appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.' He contends the motion court erred in denying his claim that plea counsel was ineffective because the court applied the incorrect standard in reviewing his claim for ineffective assistance of plea counsel. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the motion court's judgment.
AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).