Case Name: J. Willard DURDEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1956-03-02
Citations: 85 So. 2d 734
Docket Number: 
Parties: J. Willard DURDEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: DREW, C. J., HOBSON and THORNAL, JJ., and PRUNTY, Associate Justice, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 85
Pages: 734–735

Head Matter:
J. Willard DURDEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division A.
March 2, 1956.
Sam E. Murrell, Sam E. Murrell, Jr., and Robert G. Murrell, Orlándo, for appellant.
Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., and Jos. P. Manners, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee,

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This cause came on to he heard on the motion of the appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to 30 F.S.A. Rule 38 of the Rules of this court and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;
It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be and the same is hereby granted and the judgment is
Affirmed.
DREW, C. J., HOBSON and THORNAL, JJ., and PRUNTY, Associate Justice, concur.