Case Name: BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN GENERAL COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT, CENTRAL REGION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-08-11
Citations: 537 F.3d 789
Docket Number: No. 06-2542
Parties: BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN GENERAL COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT, CENTRAL REGION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, and POSNER, FLAUM, RIPPLE, KANNE, ROVNER, WOOD, EVANS, WILLIAMS, SYKES, and TINDER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 537
Pages: 789–791

Head Matter:
BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN GENERAL COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT, CENTRAL REGION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 06-2542.
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Aug. 11, 2008.
Thomas H. Geoghegan, Carol Nguyen, Despres, Schwartz & Geoghegan, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Donald J. Munro, Goodwin Procter, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, and POSNER, FLAUM, RIPPLE, KANNE, ROVNER, WOOD, EVANS, WILLIAMS, SYKES, and TINDER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
On April 23, 2008, plaintiff-appellant filed a petition for rehearing with a suggestion for rehearing en banc, and on May 16, 2008, defendant-appellee filed an answer to the petition. All of the judges on the panel voted to deny rehearing. No judge in regular active service has called for a vote on the suggestion for rehearing en banc. The petition is therefore Denied. Chief Judge Easterbrook concurs in the denial of rehearing en banc. His concurrence, in which Judge Posner joins, is attached.