Case Name: Owen v. Watson et al.
Court: Appellate Court of Indiana
Jurisdiction: Indiana
Decision Date: 1911-11-24
Citations: 49 Ind. App. 323
Docket Number: No. 7,319
Parties: Owen v. Watson et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Indiana Court of Appeals Reports
Volume: 49
Pages: 323–325

Head Matter:
Owen v. Watson et al.
[No. 7,319.
Filed November 24, 1911.
Rehearing denied January 31, 1912.]
1. Appeal. — Right Result. — Where the trial court reached a correct result, its judgment will he affirmed, p. 324.
2. Quieting Title. — Decree.—Effect.—Where defendant answered the plaintiff’s complaint to quiet title, by a general denial, an absolute decree for the plaintiff cuts off any right or interest which the defendant may have possessed at such time; but if there be a judgment that a lien exists, it may afterwards be foreclosed, p. 324.
From Eanclolph Circuit Court; James 8. Engle, Judge.
Cross-complaint by Louisa Z. Watson against Timothy S. Owen and others. From a decree for cross-complainant, cross-defendant Owen appeals.
Affirmed.
Timothy 8. Owen, for appellant.
John E. Meredith, for appellees.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This appeal is taken from a judgment rendered by the trial court on the cross-complaint of appellee Louisa Z. Watson, foreclosing a mortgage on certain real estate to which appellant held the legal title.
We have carefully examined the record in this case, and are of the opinion that the correct result was reached in the trial court. The record and briefs do not disclose any error prejudicial to appellant, and the judgment should therefore be affirmed. The questions presented are not new or unusual, and a discussion of them would be of no value to the legal profession, and certainly would be of no advantage to the parties to this suit.
The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed without opinion.