Case Name: John J. Lyons, Respondent, v. Cates Consulting Analysts, Inc., Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1985-04-02
Citations: 64 N.Y.2d 1025
Docket Number: 
Parties: John J. Lyons, Respondent, v Cates Consulting Analysts, Inc., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 64
Pages: 1025–1027

Head Matter:
John J. Lyons, Respondent, v Cates Consulting Analysts, Inc., Appellant.
Decided April 2, 1985
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Gerald, E. Ross for appellant.
Donald J. Williamson for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in so much of the memorandum at the Appellate Division as deals with the question as to whether the defense and counterclaim defeat plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (88 AD2d 526). In view of defendant's concession that the instrument sued on is one for money only within the meaning of CPLR 3213, we do not pass on that issue.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander.