Case Name: Thomas Shane MATHERLY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN, FCI BUTNER I, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-12-23
Citations: 589 F. App'x 94
Docket Number: No. 14-7258
Parties: Thomas Shane MATHERLY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN, FCI BUTNER I, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 589
Pages: 94–94

Head Matter:
Thomas Shane MATHERLY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN, FCI BUTNER I, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 14-7258.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 18, 2014.
Decided: Dec. 23, 2014.
Thomas Shane Matherly, Appellant Pro Se. Christina Ann Kelley, Bureau of Prisons, Butner, North Carolina; Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Denise Walker, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Thomas Shane Matherly, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Matherly v. Warden, No. 5:14-hc-02036-BR (E.D.N.C. Aug. 20, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.