Case Name: Christopher BRAWLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-05-15
Citations: 815 So. 2d 789
Docket Number: No. 4D00-2420
Parties: Christopher BRAWLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: WARNER, SHAHOOD and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 815
Pages: 789–789

Head Matter:
Christopher BRAWLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D00-2420.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
May 15, 2002.
Raag Singhal of Law Offices of Kaplan & Singhal, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Meredith L. Balo, Assistant Attorney General, Fort Lauder-dale, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm on all issues raised. As to the specific issues concerning the factual basis for appellant's plea and the constitutionality of section 776.051, Florida Statutes, appellant failed to preserve these issues for review on direct appeal. See generally Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2); § 924.051(4), .06(3), Fla. Stat. (2000); Jones v. State, 708 So.2d 337, 338 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). Appellant did not reserve the right to appeal any prior dispositive trial court orders when entering his no contest plea, nor did he subsequently move to withdraw his plea.
Affirmed.
WARNER, SHAHOOD and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.