Case Name: D.F.; R.E.H., Respondent, v. D.M.P., Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2011-09-27
Citations: 348 S.W.3d 865
Docket Number: Nos. WD 73599, WD 73600
Parties: D.F.; R.E.H., Respondent, v. D.M.P., Appellant.
Judges: Before: VICTOR C. HOWARD, P.J., and ALOK AHUJA and KAREN KING MITCHELL, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 348
Pages: 865–865

Head Matter:
D.F.; R.E.H., Respondent, v. D.M.P., Appellant.
Nos. WD 73599, WD 73600.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Sept. 27, 2011.
David M. Paine, Riverside, MO, pro se.
Deborah Fones, Riverside, MO, pro se.
Richard E. Hamm, Riverside, MO, pro se.
Before: VICTOR C. HOWARD, P.J., and ALOK AHUJA and KAREN KING MITCHELL, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
D.M.P. appeals two judgments issued by the Circuit Court of Platte County, entering full orders of protection in proceedings brought by petitioners R.E.H. and D.F. pursuant to the Adult Abuse Act, § 455.005 through 455.090, RSMo. D.M.P. contends that the judgments as to each petitioner are not supported by substantial evidence. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).