Case Name: The United States v. Vicki Enterprises, Inc.
Court: United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1974-06-13
Citations: 61 C.C.P.A. 75
Docket Number: CA 5516; C.A.D. 1125
Parties: The United States v. Vicki Enterprises, Inc.,
Judges: MARKET, Chief Judge, Rich, Baldwin, Lane and Miller, Associate Judges.
Reporter: Court of Customs and Patent Appeals Reports
Volume: 61
Pages: 75–77

Head Matter:
(496 F. 2d 1403)
The United States v. Vicki Enterprises, Inc.,
CA 5516
(C.A.D. 1125)
United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals,
June 13, 1974
Irving Jaffe, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Andrew P. Vance, Chief, Customs Section, Velta A. Melribrencis for the United States.
William R. Shapiro (Barnes, Richardson & Colburn) attorney of record, for .appellee. David 0. Elliott, of counsel.
[Oral argument on April 2, 1974 by Velta A. Melnbrencis and David O. Elliott]
MARKET, Chief Judge, Rich, Baldwin, Lane and Miller, Associate Judges.
Petition for rehearing denied September 12,1974.

Opinion:
BaldwiN, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision and judgment of the Second Division of the Customs Court, Appellate Term which appears at 68 Cust. Ct. 324, A.R.D. 302, 343 F. Supp. 1381 (1972) and affirms the judgment of a single judge sitting in reappraisement, 67 Cust. Ct. 480, R.D. 11750 (1971). The imported merchandise is field glasses.
Both courts below sustained the importer's appeal and held that •the 26 consolidated appeals for reappraisement involved separable appraisements and that the disputed inland charges and buying commission charges were non-dutiable.
After a thorough consideration of appellant's arguments, we have concluded that we are in full agreement with the opinion of the Appellate Term, and we adopt it as our own. The judgment is affirmed.