Case Name: RUSH, Respondent, v. KLEIN, Appellant
Court: New York City Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1901-05
Citations: 72 N.Y.S. 1126
Docket Number: 
Parties: RUSH, Respondent, v. KLEIN, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 72
Pages: 1126–1126

Head Matter:
RUSH, Respondent, v. KLEIN, Appellant.
(City Court of New York,
General Term.
May, 1901.)
Action hy Thomas E. Rush against Mary Klein.
Menken Bros. (Mortimer M. Men-ken, of counsel), for appellant. J. Harry Hull (Ohos. W. Ridgway, of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
HASCALL, J.
The appellant, hy the answer interposed, is in position to contest each item of the plaintiff's claim, thus bringing this case within Spence v. Simis, 137 N. Y. 616, 33 N. E. 554; and we therefore decide that the order appealed from was properly made. Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements to respondent. Order affirmed, with costs to respondent.
OONLAN and O'DWYER, JJ., concur.