Case Name: Paula K. STONE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BAYER CORPORATION DISABILITY PLANS, erroneously sued as Bayer Corporation Long Term Disability Plan, an employee welfare benefit plan and Bayer Corporation, an Indiana corporation, Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-07-20
Citations: 444 F. App'x 162
Docket Number: 
Parties: Paula K. STONE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BAYER CORPORATION DISABILITY PLANS, erroneously sued as Bayer Corporation Long Term Disability Plan, an employee welfare benefit plan and Bayer Corporation, an Indiana corporation, Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: Before: PREGERSON, WARDLAW, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 444
Pages: 162–163

Head Matter:
Paula K. STONE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BAYER CORPORATION DISABILITY PLANS, erroneously sued as Bayer Corporation Long Term Disability Plan, an employee welfare benefit plan and Bayer Corporation, an Indiana corporation, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 10-35665.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 14, 2011.
Filed July 20, 2011.
Ralph E. Wiser, III, Wiser & Associates, Lake Oswego, OR, for Plaintiff-Ap-pellee.
Jerome Schreibstein, Law Office of Jerome Schreibstein, Esq., San Francisco, CA, for Defendants-Appellants.
Before: PREGERSON, WARDLAW, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Defendants appeal the district court's grant of summary judgment in Plaintiffs favor. For the reasons stated in the district court's well-written and well-reasoned Opinion and Order of January 15, 2010, we affirm.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.