Case Name: Wood v. Horton & Smith
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1901-04-27
Citations: 113 Ga. 361
Docket Number: 
Parties: Wood v. Horton & Smith.
Judges: All the Justices concurring.
Reporter: Georgia Reports
Volume: 113
Pages: 361–361

Head Matter:
Wood v. Horton & Smith.
Argued April 5,
Decided April 27, 1901.
Action on warranty. Before Judge Henry. Floyd superior court. January 3, 1901.
M. B. Bubanks, for plaintiff in error.
6?. A. 3. Harris & Son and B. L. Ohamlee, contra.

Opinion:
Cobb, J.
No error of law was complained of. While the evidence was conflicting and appears to preponderate against the verdict, still the same can be supported by inferences legitimately drawn from the evidence introduced in behalf of the prevailing party ; and the discretion of the trial judge in refusing to grant a new trial will not be controlled.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concurring.