Case Name: PETER JAY SOSTILLIO, Petitioner on Review, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent on Review
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2000-01-27
Citations: 329 Or. 606
Docket Number: CA A93374; SC S44268
Parties: PETER JAY SOSTILLIO, Petitioner on Review, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent on Review.
Judges: Before Carson, Chief Justice, and Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Durham, and Leeson, Justices.
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 329
Pages: 606–606

Head Matter:
On petition for review filed May 30, 1997,
petition for review allowed; decision of Court of Appeals vacated and case remanded to Court of Appeals with instructions January 27, 2000
PETER JAY SOSTILLIO, Petitioner on Review, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent on Review.
(CA A93374; SC S44268)
997 P2d 190
Daniel Q. O’Dell, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, filed the petition for petitioner on review. With him on the petition was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender.
No appearance contra.
Before Carson, Chief Justice, and Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Durham, and Leeson, Justices.
Fadeley, J., retired January 31, 1998, and did not participate in this decision; Graber, J., resigned March 3Í, 1998, and did not participate in this decision; Kulongoski, and Riggs, JJ., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals with instructions to dismiss the petition for judicial review. See Quintero v. Board of Parole, 329 Or 319, 986 P2d 575 (1999).