Case Name: Charles WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, BRISTOL, VIRGINIA; Police Department, Bristol, Virginia, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-08-27
Citations: 107 F. App'x 372
Docket Number: No. 04-1481
Parties: Charles WILSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, BRISTOL, VIRGINIA; Police Department, Bristol, Virginia, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 107
Pages: 372–372

Head Matter:
Charles WILSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, BRISTOL, VIRGINIA; Police Department, Bristol, Virginia, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 04-1481.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 20, 2004.
Decided Aug. 27, 2004.
Charles Wilson, Appellant pro se.
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Charles Wilson appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Wilson v. Sheriff's Dep't, No. CA-04-43-7 (W.D.Va. filed Mar. 29, 2004 & entered Mar. 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED