Case Name: Warren A. TAYLOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John E. POTTER, Postmaster General for the United States Postal Service, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-01-13
Citations: 119 F. App'x 508
Docket Number: No. 04-2090
Parties: Warren A. TAYLOR, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. John E. POTTER, Postmaster General for the United States Postal Service, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 119
Pages: 508–508

Head Matter:
Warren A. TAYLOR, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. John E. POTTER, Postmaster General for the United States Postal Service, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 04-2090.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 23, 2004.
Decided: Jan. 13, 2005.
Warren A. Taylor, Appellant pro se.
Larry David Adams, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Warren A. Taylor appeals the district court's orders granting Defendant's motion for summary judgment in Taylor's action under Title VII and denying his motions for leave to amend his complaint, for reconsideration, and for copy work at government expense. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion or reversible error. Accordingly, we deny as moot his motions to expedite and for consideration of his expedition motion by a single circuit judge, and we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Taylor v. Potter, No. CA-03-1244-PJM (D. Md. Oct. 9, 2003; Jan. 30, 2004; Aug. 11, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED