Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Daniel DeFairia, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1992-10-01
Citations: 186 A.D.2d 366
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Daniel DeFairia, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 186
Pages: 366–367

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Daniel DeFairia, Appellant.

Opinion:
— Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stephen L. Barrett, J.), rendered November 15, 1988, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of manslaughter in the first degree, assault in the third degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, and sentencing him to a term of IVi to 22 Vi years to run concurrently with two 1 year terms, unanimously affirmed.
The evidence regarding defendant's tirade in the hallway approximately thirty minutes before he punched one of the victims in the face and forty-five minutes before he stabbed the other victim to death was properly admitted since the incident was relevant to the issues in the case (see, People v Lewis, 69 NY2d 321, 325), including whether defendant acted justifiably when he stabbed the victim. Therefore, contrary to defendant's unpreserved appellate argument, the prosecutor could properly argue in summation that defendant's swearing in the hallway and his assault of the decedent's wife were consistent with the inference that defendant was not acting reasonably and was the initial aggressor when he stabbed the decedent. Furthermore, contrary to defendant's argument, the prosecutor did not impermissibly mischaracterize the defense by arguing in summation that defense counsel wanted the jury to believe that defendant was a victim and that the decedent was not. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Asch and Rubin, JJ.