Case Name: The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Roy, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2011-02-10
Citations: 128 Ohio St. 3d 340
Docket Number: No. 2010-1877
Parties: The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Roy, Appellant.
Judges: O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 128
Pages: 340–341

Head Matter:
The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Roy, Appellant.
[Cite as State v. Roy, 128 Ohio St.3d 340, 2011-Ohio-544.]
(No. 2010-1877
Submitted January 18, 2011
Decided February 10, 2011.)
William F. Oswall Jr., for appellant.

Opinion:
{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.
{¶ 2} The portion of the judgment of the court of appeals addressing appellant's sixth assignment of error below is vacated on the authority of State v. Johnson, 128 Ohio St.3d 153, 2010-Ohio-6314, 942 N.E.2d 1061, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of our decision in State v. Johnson.
O'Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.