Case Name: Melissa GUSTAFSON, Appellant, v. FULL SERVICE MAINTENANCE CORPORATION and Division of Employment Security, Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2011-09-13
Citations: 352 S.W.3d 369
Docket Number: No. ED 96253
Parties: Melissa GUSTAFSON, Appellant, v. FULL SERVICE MAINTENANCE CORPORATION and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR. P.J. and MARY K. HOFF and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 352
Pages: 369–370

Head Matter:
Melissa GUSTAFSON, Appellant, v. FULL SERVICE MAINTENANCE CORPORATION and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.
No. ED 96253.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Sept. 13, 2011.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 14, 2011.
Melissa Gustafson, St. Louis, MO, pro se.
Full Service Maintenance Corp., St. Louis, MO, pro se.
Larry R. Ruhmann, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR. P.J. and MARY K. HOFF and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Melissa Gustafson ("Claimant") appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission ("the Commission") denying her petition for unemployment benefits. Claimant argues the Commission erred: (1) in finding she committed misconduct; (2) in failing to investigate whether Dennis Fahy ("Fahy") committed perjury; and (3) in failing to inquire into Claimant's allegation that Fahy subjected her to abusive conduct and profane language.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).