Case Name: In re: STANLEY JAMES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Debtor. James King, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Brian A. Goldman, Trustee, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-05-25
Citations: 182 F. App'x 237
Docket Number: No. 05-2204
Parties: In re: STANLEY JAMES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Debtor. James King, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Brian A. Goldman, Trustee, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Bankruptcy Reporter
Volume: 347
Pages: 237–237

Head Matter:
In re: STANLEY JAMES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Debtor. James King, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Brian A. Goldman, Trustee, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 05-2204.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 18, 2006.
Decided: May 25, 2006.
James King, Appellant Pro Se. Carl Steven Silverman, Goldman & Goldman, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
James King appeals from the district court's order dismissing the appeal filed by King on behalf of Stanley James Development Corporation. The notice of appeal to this court was signed only by King, who is not an attorney. It is well settled that a corporation cannot appear in federal court except through its attorney. Rowland v. California Men's Colony, 506 U.S. 194, 201-02, 113 S.Ct. 716, 121 L.Ed.2d 656 (1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED