Case Name: Bernard KANDEL and Jacqueline E. Kandel, Appellants, v. COMEAU BUILDING, INC., et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1984-12-12
Citations: 462 So. 2d 28
Docket Number: No. 84-116
Parties: Bernard KANDEL and Jacqueline E. Kandel, Appellants, v. COMEAU BUILDING, INC., et al., Appellees.
Judges: LETTS, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 462
Pages: 28–29

Head Matter:
Bernard KANDEL and Jacqueline E. Kandel, Appellants, v. COMEAU BUILDING, INC., et al., Appellees.
No. 84-116.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Dec. 12, 1984.
Rehearing and Clarification Denied Feb. 5, 1985.
John B. Powell of Powell, Tennyson & St. John, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellants.
Moira K. Lasch of Baskin & Steingut, and Richard L. Martens of Boose, Ciklin & Martens, West Palm Beach, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We are of the opinion that the defendants, Bernard Kandel and Jacqueline E. Kandel, even though denominated as sub-lessees, were given an option to renew the lease in question by the lessor, which renewal option was reflected by Addendum No. 2 dated November 12,1980. Moreover, it clearly appears that the Kandels validly exercised their option and are entitled to its benefits.
The judgment on appeal is
REVERSED.
LETTS, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.