Case Name: Samuel JONES, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PREUIT & MAULDIN, a partnership composed of E.F. Mauldin, individually, and E.F. Mauldin as Executor or Administrator of the Estate of Leonard Preuit, Deceased; E.F. Mauldin; E.F. Mauldin as Executor or Administrator of the Estate of Leonard Preuit, Deceased; and Preuit Mauldin, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1987-11-24
Citations: 833 F.2d 1436
Docket Number: No. 86-7415-1
Parties: Samuel JONES, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PREUIT & MAULDIN, a partnership composed of E.F. Mauldin, individually, and E.F. Mauldin as Executor or Administrator of the Estate of Leonard Preuit, Deceased; E.F. Mauldin; E.F. Mauldin as Executor or Administrator of the Estate of Leonard Preuit, Deceased; and Preuit Mauldin, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before RONEY, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 833
Pages: 1436–1437

Head Matter:
Samuel JONES, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PREUIT & MAULDIN, a partnership composed of E.F. Mauldin, individually, and E.F. Mauldin as Executor or Administrator of the Estate of Leonard Preuit, Deceased; E.F. Mauldin; E.F. Mauldin as Executor or Administrator of the Estate of Leonard Preuit, Deceased; and Preuit Mauldin, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 86-7415-1.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Nov. 24, 1987.
Burr & Forman, C.V. Stelzenmuller, F.A. Flowers, III, Birmingham, Ala., for plaintiff-appellant.
Potts, Young, Blasingame & Putnam, Robert W. Beasley, Florence, Ala., Don Sie-gelman, Atty. Gen., Ronald C. Forehand, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State of Ala., Montgomery, Ala., Bradley, Arant, Rose & White, David G. Hymer, Donald M. James, Birmingham, Ala., for defendants-appel-lees.
Before RONEY, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING IN BANC
BY THE COURT:
A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing in banc and a majority of the judges of this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing in banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court in banc with oral argument during the week of February 22, 1988, on or hereafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of in banc briefs. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.