Case Name: ELECTRO SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Joseph Henry FREEMAN, Personal Representative of the Estate of Martin McIlvena, and Margaret McIlvena, Defendants/Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-07-22
Citations: 110 S.W.3d 868
Docket Number: No. ED 81482
Parties: ELECTRO SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Joseph Henry FREEMAN, Personal Representative of the Estate of Martin McIlvena, and Margaret McIlvena, Defendants/Respondents.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR, P.J, and MARY K. HOFF and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 110
Pages: 868–869

Head Matter:
ELECTRO SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Joseph Henry FREEMAN, Personal Representative of the Estate of Martin McIlvena, and Margaret McIlvena, Defendants/Respondents.
No. ED 81482.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
July 22, 2003.
Paul J. Puricelli, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Michael H. James, Chesterfield, MO, for respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR, P.J, and MARY K. HOFF and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Electro Security Systems, Inc. (Buyer) appeals from the trial court's order granting Martin and Margaret Mcllvena's (Sellers) motion to dismiss Count II of Buyer's first amended petition to set aside an arbitration award. On appeal Buyer argues the trial court erred in setting aside the arbitration award because Buyer pleaded facts that support vacating the arbitrator's award due to fraud in the arbitrator's decision or decision-making process and pleaded fraud with specificity and particularity under Section 435.405(1) RSMo 2000. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error was not preserved. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Sellers' motion to dismiss Buyer's appeal that was taken with the case is denied.
. Martin Mcllvena died during the pendency of the appeal. Joseph Henry Freeman, Personal Representative of his estate, has been substituted in his stead.