Case Name: Michael A. McNEIL, Debtor-Appellant, v. v. Peter MARKUSKI, Jr., Defendant-Appellee, and Brian Arthur Goldman; Nancy Spencer Grigsby, Trustees; Michael A. McNeil, Debtor-Appellant, v. Stephen A. Drazin, Defendant-Appellee, and Brian A. Goldman; Nancy Spencer Grigsby, Trustees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-03-27
Citations: 562 F. App'x 179
Docket Number: Nos. 13-2269, 13-2276
Parties: Michael A. McNEIL, Debtor-Appellant, v. v. Peter MARKUSKI, Jr., Defendant-Appellee, and Brian Arthur Goldman; Nancy Spencer Grigsby, Trustees. Michael A. McNeil, Debtor-Appellant, v. Stephen A. Drazin, Defendant-Appellee, and Brian A. Goldman; Nancy Spencer Grigsby, Trustees.
Judges: Before GREGORY, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Bankruptcy Reporter
Volume: 513
Pages: 179–179

Head Matter:
Michael A. McNEIL, Debtor-Appellant, v. v. Peter MARKUSKI, Jr., Defendant-Appellee, and Brian Arthur Goldman; Nancy Spencer Grigsby, Trustees. Michael A. McNeil, Debtor-Appellant, v. Stephen A. Drazin, Defendant-Appellee, and Brian A. Goldman; Nancy Spencer Grigsby, Trustees.
Nos. 13-2269, 13-2276.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 25, 2014.
Decided: March 27, 2014.
Michael A. McNeil, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey Wayne Bernstein, Goozman, Bernstein & Markuski, Laurel, Maryland; Stephen A. Drazin, Columbia, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before GREGORY, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Michael A. McNeil appeals the district court's order affirming the bankruptcy court's orders overruling his objections to proofs of claim in his bankruptcy proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss for the reasons stated by the district court. McNeil v. Markuski, 499 B.R. 484 (D.Md.2013). We deny McNeil's motion to strike Appellee's informal brief and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.