Case Name: CRAFTMASTER OF BREVARD, INC., Petitioner, v. MEAD CONSTRUCTION, INC., etc., Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2003-11-14
Citations: 858 So. 2d 1253
Docket Number: No. 5D03-702
Parties: CRAFTMASTER OF BREVARD, INC., Petitioner, v. MEAD CONSTRUCTION, INC., etc., Respondent.
Judges: PALMER and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 858
Pages: 1253–1255

Head Matter:
CRAFTMASTER OF BREVARD, INC., Petitioner, v. MEAD CONSTRUCTION, INC., etc., Respondent.
No. 5D03-702.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Nov. 14, 2003.
Allan P. Whitehead, of Frese, Nash & Hansen, P.A., Melbourne, for Petitioner.
Michael R. Riemenschneider and William H. Cantwell, II, of O’Brien Riemen-schneider, P.A., Melbourne, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, Craftmaster of Brevard, Inc. ["Craftmaster"], seeks review of an interlocutory order of the trial court imposing sanctions in a construction case on Craft-master based on a theory of spoliation of evidence. The sanction imposed was to bar any testimony of observations made by one of Craftmaster's experts, or corrective work done based on the expert's recommendations.
A writ of certiorari will not support review of the order at issue because the order, if error, is fully remediable on direct appeal.
PETITION DENIED.
PALMER and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.
GRIFFIN, J., concurs and concurs specially, with opinion.