Case Name: MACKAY & KNOBEL ENTERPRISES, INC., a Utah corporation, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. TETON VAN GAS, INC., a corporation, Defendant and Respondent
Court: Utah Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Utah
Decision Date: 1971-06-23
Citations: 26 Utah 2d 137
Docket Number: No. 12306
Parties: MACKAY & KNOBEL ENTERPRISES, INC., a Utah corporation, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. TETON VAN GAS, INC., a corporation, Defendant and Respondent.
Judges: CALLISTER, C. J., and HENRIOD, ELLETT and CROCKETT, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Utah Reports, Second Series
Volume: 26
Pages: 137–138

Head Matter:
486 P.2d 386
MACKAY & KNOBEL ENTERPRISES, INC., a Utah corporation, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. TETON VAN GAS, INC., a corporation, Defendant and Respondent.
No. 12306.
Supreme Court of Utah.
June 23, 1971.
Ronald C. Barker, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and appellant.
H. Wayne Wadsworth, Salt Lake City, for defendant and respondent.

Opinion:
TUCKETT, Justice.
The plaintiff commenced this action in the District Court of Salt Lake County on May 27, 1964, against Teton Van Gas, Inc. The plaintiff seeks to recover damages for the destruction by fire of its service station in Summit County. It is the plaintiff's claim that the fire resulted from the defendant's negligence in installing a butane gas tank without proper controls. The defendant moved the court to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff's corporate charter had been suspended prior to the initiation of this action. After a hearing a minute entry was made by the court dismissing the action. Thereafter the plaintiff filed' an action in the District Court of Summit County seeking similar relief against the defendant Teton Van Gas, and Van Gas, Inc., was added as an additional defendant. The defendants in the Summit County action moved for dismissal on the ground that the plaintiff corporation lacked legal capacity to maintain the action, and thereafter the court made and entered an order dismissing the action. An appeal was taken from the judgment of dismissal and this court reversed. The decision in that case is controlling here.
The defendants request this court to abate these proceedings inasmuch as the plaintiff elected to file a similar case in Summit County wherein defendant here was made a party. This matter was raised for the first time on appeal. An examination of the record reveals that the District Court was not requested to abate either this case or the one filed in Summit County.
The judgment of dismissal in this case is reversed. Appellant is entitled to costs.
CALLISTER, C. J., and HENRIOD, ELLETT and CROCKETT, JJ., concur.
. Mackay & Knobel Enterprises, Inc., v. Teton Van Gas, Inc., 23 Utah 2d 200, 460 P.2d 828.