Case Name: James HIGGS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1992-01-28
Citations: 826 S.W.2d 86
Docket Number: No. 60097
Parties: James HIGGS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 826
Pages: 86–86

Head Matter:
James HIGGS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent.
No. 60097.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Jan. 28, 1992.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 3, 1992.
Application to Transfer Denied April 21, 1992.
David Bruns, St. Louis, for movant/ap-pellant.
William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for defendant/respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant appeals from an order denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an eviden-tiary hearing. The motion court's judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).