Case Name: Denise MATHIS and Ricky Mathis, her husband, Appellants, v. RANDSTAD US, L.P., Randstad General Partner(US) LLC, Randstad North America, L.P., Randstad North American Partner, Inc., Amsterdam Clipper Beheer bv, Randstad Beheer bv, Randstad Clipper Beheer bv, Randstad Holding nv and Rederij Clipper Stad Amsterdam, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2010-11-03
Citations: 126 So. 3d 268
Docket Number: No. 3D09-3101
Parties: Denise MATHIS and Ricky Mathis, her husband, Appellants, v. RANDSTAD US, L.P., Randstad General Partner(US) LLC, Randstad North America, L.P., Randstad North American Partner, Inc., Amsterdam Clipper Beheer bv, Randstad Beheer bv, Randstad Clipper Beheer bv, Randstad Holding nv and Rederij Clipper Stad Amsterdam, Appellees.
Judges: Before WELLS, CORTIÑAS, and LAGOA, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 126
Pages: 268–269

Head Matter:
Denise MATHIS and Ricky Mathis, her husband, Appellants, v. RANDSTAD US, L.P., Randstad General Partner(US) LLC, Randstad North America, L.P., Randstad North American Partner, Inc., Amsterdam Clipper Beheer bv, Randstad Beheer bv, Randstad Clipper Beheer bv, Randstad Holding nv and Rederij Clipper Stad Amsterdam, Appellees.
No. 3D09-3101.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 3, 2010.
Rehearing Denied Dec. 29, 2010.
Ginsberg & Schwartz and Arnold R. Ginsberg, Miami; Mustell & Borrow and Charles Mustell, for appellants.
Rosemary Wilder, Ft. Lauderdale, for appellees.
Before WELLS, CORTIÑAS, and LAGOA, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Cook v. Crazy Boat of Key West, Inc., 949 So.2d 1202, 1203 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007); Krathen v. Sch. Bd. of Monroe Cnty., 972 So.2d 887 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007).