Case Name: In the Matter of the Compensation of Robert L. Dietz, Claimant. Robert L. DIETZ, Petitioner on Review, v. RAMUDA and SAIF Corporation, Respondents on Review
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1995-08-03
Citations: 321 Or. 416
Docket Number: WCB 92-09712; CA A81010; SC S41759
Parties: In the Matter of the Compensation of Robert L. Dietz, Claimant. Robert L. DIETZ, Petitioner on Review, v. RAMUDA and SAIF Corporation, Respondents on Review.
Judges: Before Gillette, Presiding Justice, and Van Hoomissen, Fadeley, Unis, Graber, and Durham, Justices.
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 321
Pages: 416–416

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted May 4,
review dismissed as improvidently allowed August 3, 1995
In the Matter of the Compensation of Robert L. Dietz, Claimant. Robert L. DIETZ, Petitioner on Review, v. RAMUDA and SAIF Corporation, Respondents on Review.
(WCB 92-09712; CA A81010; SC S41759)
898 P2d 768
Floyd H. Shebley, Oregon City, argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner on review.
David L. Runner, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent on review SAIF Corporation. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.
No appearance for respondent on review Ramuda.
Before Gillette, Presiding Justice, and Van Hoomissen, Fadeley, Unis, Graber, and Durham, Justices.
Carson, C. J., did not participate in this decision.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Review dismissed as improvidently allowed.
Fadeley and Durham, JJ., would not dismiss.