Case Name: Mary K. Hubert, Appellant, v. James J. Devine, Doing Business as James J. Devine Graphics, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1997-09-15
Citations: 242 A.D.2d 561
Docket Number: 
Parties: Mary K. Hubert, Appellant, v James J. Devine, Doing Business as James J. Devine Graphics, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 242
Pages: 561–562

Head Matter:
Mary K. Hubert, Appellant, v James J. Devine, Doing Business as James J. Devine Graphics, Respondent.
[664 NYS2d 728]

Opinion:
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.), entered March 13, 1996, which denied her motion for a new trial on the ground that the Referee failed to file a written decision after the matter was finally submitted.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
We decline to disturb the Supreme Court's order denying the plaintiff's motion for a new trial on the sole ground that the Referee failed to file a written decision within 30 days after the matter was finally submitted (see, CPLR 4319). Miller, J. P., Thompson, Joy and Luciano, JJ., concur.