Case Name: Heady Electric Co., Inc., Respondent, v. Illiana von Kerckerinck et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1988-04-21
Citations: 71 N.Y.2d 927
Docket Number: 
Parties: Heady Electric Co., Inc., Respondent, v Illiana von Kerckerinck et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 71
Pages: 927–927

Head Matter:
Heady Electric Co., Inc., Respondent, v Illiana von Kerckerinck et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.
Submitted February 8,1988;
decided April 21, 1988

Opinion:
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as affirmed the denial of defendants' motion to vacate the default judgment, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the remainder of the Appellate Division order, dismissed upon the ground that defendants are not parties aggrieved (CPLR 5511).