Case Name: City of New Rochelle, Respondent, v. Morgan H. Seacord, Appellant, and Others, Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1942-06-22
Citations: 264 A.D. 882
Docket Number: 
Parties: City of New Rochelle, Respondent, v. Morgan H. Seacord, Appellant, and Others, Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 264
Pages: 882–883

Head Matter:
City of New Rochelle, Respondent, v. Morgan H. Seacord, Appellant, and Others, Defendants.

Opinion:
Order granting a stay of execution of a judgment directing the sale of premises for unpaid taxes upon specific conditions, in so far as appealed from, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Appellant furnished an undertaking and paid the advertising costs in accordance with the provisions of the order, instead of taking an immediate appeal, and he may not now, after having had the benefit of the stay so obtained, attack the validity of the order and nullify the terms under which the stay was granted. (City of Utica v. Hanna, 249 N. Y. 26; Goodwin v. Bunzl, 102 id. 224; Mossein v. Empire State Surety Co., 97 App. Div. 230, 233.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.