Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DAVID RAYMOND DURHAM, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1977-10-04
Citations: 31 Or. App. 107
Docket Number: Nos. 17-101 and 17-150, CA 7789 and 7790
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DAVID RAYMOND DURHAM, Appellant.
Judges: Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Thornton and Tanzer, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 31
Pages: [107]–[107]

Head Matter:
Argued September 21,
affirmed October 4,
reconsideration denied November 9,
petition for review denied December 20, 1977
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DAVID RAYMOND DURHAM, Appellant.
(Nos. 17-101 and 17-150, CA 7789 and 7790)
(Consolidated cases)
569 P2d 59
J. Marvin Kuhn, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.
Thomas H. Denney, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were James A. Redden, Attorney General, and W. Michael Gillette, Solicitor General, Salem.
Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Thornton and Tanzer, Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See State v. Henley, 31 Or App 109, 569 P2d 58 (1977).