Case Name: In re Michael Lawrence EISNER, Respondent
Court: District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Decision Date: 2013-06-13
Citations: 67 A.3d 1057
Docket Number: No. 13-BG-279; Bar Registration No. 987138, BDN: 85-13
Parties: In re Michael Lawrence EISNER, Respondent.
Judges: BEFORE: GLICKMAN, Associate Judge, and TERRY and STEADMAN, Senior Judges.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 67
Pages: 1057–1057

Head Matter:
In re Michael Lawrence EISNER, Respondent.
No. 13-BG-279.
Bar Registration No. 987138, BDN: 85-13.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
June 13, 2013.
BEFORE: GLICKMAN, Associate Judge, and TERRY and STEADMAN, Senior Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
On consideration of the certified order revoking respondent's license to practice law in the state of Virginia, this court's April 3, 2013, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing him to show cause why the reciprocal discipline of disbarment should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file a response to this court's order to show cause or the affidavit required by D.C.Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is
ORDERED that Michael Lawrence Eisner is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. See In re Bogollagama, 979 A.2d 629 (D.C. 2009)(the functional equivalent discipline to the revocation of one's license to practice law is disbarment); see also In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C.2010), and In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate). It is
FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement the period of respondent's disbarment will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C.Bar R. XI, § 14(g).