Case Name: William Allen LEGG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SPRING GROVE HOSPITAL, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-04-30
Citations: 33 F. App'x 127
Docket Number: No. 02-1071
Parties: William Allen LEGG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SPRING GROVE HOSPITAL, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 33
Pages: 127–127

Head Matter:
William Allen LEGG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SPRING GROVE HOSPITAL, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 02-1071.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 18, 2002.
Decided April 30, 2002.
William Allen Legg, Appellant Pro Se.
Before DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
William Allen Legg seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because Legg's notice of appeal was not timely filed.
Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court's final judgment or order to note an appeal, see Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. RApp. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (1960)).
The district court's order was entered on the docket on September 25, 2001. Legg's notice of appeal was filed on December 27, 2001. Because Legg failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We deny Legg's motions for discovery and for general relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.