Case Name: Kenneth BAKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1999-10-22
Citations: 745 So. 2d 1035
Docket Number: No. 97-05161
Parties: Kenneth BAKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and PARKER and GREEN, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 745
Pages: 1035–1036

Head Matter:
Kenneth BAKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 97-05161.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Oct. 22, 1999.
Gary M. Glassman of Glassman & Golden Norris, Sarasota, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Angela D. McCravy, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Kenneth Baker appeals the final judgment after the jury found him guilty of uttering a forged instrument. We affirm because contrary to Baker's position, the trial court was not required to conduct a full Faretta hearing under the circumstances of this case.
Baker was very clear that he wanted to assist his attorney. Faretta only applies when the defendant makes a clear and unequivocal request for self-representation. See Bell v. State, 699 So.2d 674, 676 (Fla.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1123, 118 S.Ct. 1067, 140 L.Ed.2d 127 (1998). In Bell, the defendant asked the trial court to be allowed to assist his attorney because of complaints he had about counsel. The supreme court concluded that Bell never asked to represent himself, and therefore, the trial court did not err by not conducting a full Faretta hearing. Id. at 677. Therefore, in the instant case, there was no trial court error.
Affirmed.
CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and PARKER and GREEN, JJ., Concur.
. Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975).