Case Name: Ramey v. Coney, Lovejoy & Company
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1911-09-22
Citations: 136 Ga. 791
Docket Number: 
Parties: Ramey v. Coney, Lovejoy & Company.
Judges: Jiech, J., absent. The other Justices concur.
Reporter: Georgia Reports
Volume: 136
Pages: 791–791

Head Matter:
Ramey v. Coney, Lovejoy & Company.
September 22, 1911.
Claim. Before Judge Martin. Pulaski superior court.. June 25, 1910.
H: E. Coates and Payne, Little & Jones, for plaintiff in error.
M. II. Boyer and Anderson, Felder, Rountree & Wilson, contra.

Opinion:
Fish, C. J.
There was no error in the admission of evidence. The instructions to the jury upon which error was assigned were not subject to the exceptions taken thereto; nor did the court err in merely failing to explain to the jury the meaning of "the burden of proof," or of "ground for reasonable suspicion;" nor in merely failing-to instruct the jury as complained of. The verdict was not without evidence to support it; and the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in refusing to grant a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Jiech, J., absent. The other Justices concur.