Case Name: Donald ZEISER, Appellant, v. Amir H. TAJKARIMI and Three Rivers Systems, Inc., Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2008-09-30
Citations: 265 S.W.3d 357
Docket Number: No. ED 90399
Parties: Donald ZEISER, Appellant, v. Amir H. TAJKARIMI and Three Rivers Systems, Inc., Respondents.
Judges: Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 265
Pages: 357–358

Head Matter:
Donald ZEISER, Appellant, v. Amir H. TAJKARIMI and Three Rivers Systems, Inc., Respondents.
No. ED 90399.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Sept. 30, 2008.
Dennis J. Campbell, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
Gregory H. Wolk, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Donald K. Zeiser (hereinafter, "Zeiser") appeals from the trial court's judgment entered after a jury returned a verdict in favor of Amir Tajkarimi and Three Rivers Systems, Inc. (hereinafter and collectively, "Three Rivers") on his claim of breach of contract. Zeiser asserts Three Rivers had no defense against his claims for breach of contract and damages and was entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. We find no error. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).