Case Name: Rosetta WEINTRAUB, Personal Representative of the Estate of Geraldine Drucker, deceased, Appellant, v. Barry DRUCKER and Sandra Drucker, Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-01-20
Citations: 965 S.W.2d 187
Docket Number: No. 71737
Parties: Rosetta WEINTRAUB, Personal Representative of the Estate of Geraldine Drucker, deceased, Appellant, v. Barry DRUCKER and Sandra Drucker, Respondents.
Judges: Before CRANE, P.J., and RHODES RUSSELL and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 965
Pages: 187–188

Head Matter:
Rosetta WEINTRAUB, Personal Representative of the Estate of Geraldine Drucker, deceased, Appellant, v. Barry DRUCKER and Sandra Drucker, Respondents.
No. 71737.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Jan. 20, 1998.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 24, 1998.
Application for Transfer Denied May 26, 1998.
Irl B. Baris, Jon M. Baris, Baris Law Firm, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jack B. Spooner, Wittner, Poger, Rosen-blum, Kessler, Spewak & Maylaek, P.C., St. Louis, for respondent.
Before CRANE, P.J., and RHODES RUSSELL and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a judgment for defendants in an action for an accounting. There is sufficient evidence to support the judgment. No error of law appears.
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).