Case Name: The WILSON TRANSIT COMPANY, Appellant, v. The FAIRCHILD MILLING COMPANY, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1937-04-15
Citations: 89 F.2d 1023
Docket Number: No. 7202
Parties: The WILSON TRANSIT COMPANY, Appellant, v. The FAIRCHILD MILLING COMPANY, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 89
Pages: 1023–1023

Head Matter:
The WILSON TRANSIT COMPANY, Appellant, v. The FAIRCHILD MILLING COMPANY, Appellee.
No. 7202.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
April 15, 1937.
Duncan, Leckie, McCreary and Schlitz & Hinslea, all of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellant.
McKeehan, Merrick, Arter & Stewart, of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellee.
Before MOORMAN, HICKS, and SIMONS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The court being of opinion that there was substantial evidence on which to submit this cause to the jury, and that no error prejudicial to the appellant was committed by the trial court in its charge to-the jury or in refusing to charge the jury as requested by appellant, it is ordered that the judgment be affirmed.