Case Name: Mark WEBB, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Eddie YLST, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-08-20
Citations: 72 F. App'x 716
Docket Number: No. 02-15132; D.C. No. CV-98-20752-RMW
Parties: Mark WEBB, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Eddie YLST, Respondent—Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 72
Pages: 716–717

Head Matter:
Mark WEBB, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Eddie YLST, Respondent—Appellee.
No. 02-15132. D.C. No. CV-98-20752-RMW.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 11, 2003.
Decided Aug. 20, 2003.
Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, and HAWKINS and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
California state prisoner Mark Webb appeals the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition, challenging his conviction for methamphetanaine possession. We affirm.
Webb contends his sentence under California's "three strikes" law violates the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. We conclude that petitioner's argument is foreclosed by Ewing v. California, 538 U.S. 11, 123 S.Ct. 1179, 1190, 155 L.Ed.2d 108 (2003) (acknowledging broad discretion possessed by legislatures and holding that three-strikes sentence of 25 years to life for felony grand theft was not grossly disproportionate), and Lockyer v. Andrade, 538 U.S. 63, 123 S.Ct. 1166, 1175, 155 L.Ed.2d 144 (2003) (holding that state court's affirmance of two consecutive 25-years-tolife sentences for petty theft was not contrary to or an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law). The district court therefore properly denied Webb's petition. See Andrade, 538 U.S. at-, 123 S.Ct. at 1174.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.