Case Name: Millvale Sportsmen's Club, Inc. and American States Insurance Co., Petitioners v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board and James H. King, Respondents
Court: Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1978-11-01
Citations: 38 Pa. Commw. 339
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 1610 C.D. 1977
Parties: Millvale Sportsmen’s Club, Inc. and American States Insurance Co., Petitioners v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board and James H. King, Respondents.
Judges: before Judges Blatt, DiSalle and MacPhail, sitting as a panel of three.
Reporter: Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court Reports
Volume: 38
Pages: 339–341

Head Matter:
Millvale Sportsmen’s Club, Inc. and American States Insurance Co., Petitioners v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board and James H. King, Respondents.
Argued September 11, 1978,
November 1, 1978:
before Judges Blatt, DiSalle and MacPhail, sitting as a panel of three.
Raymond F. Keisling, with him Will & Keisling, for petitioners.
James A. Prossi, with him Martin Lubow, and James N. Diefenderfer, for respondents.

Opinion:
Opinion by
Judge Blatt,
The Millvale Sportsmen's Club, Inc., (employer) appeals from an order of the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Board), which affirmed a referee's decision awarding benefits and attorney's fees to James H. King (claimant). Three issues are raised by the employer: (1) whether or not the claimant was an employee of the Millvale Sportsmen's Club, Inc.; (2) whether or not the claimant suffered a permanent loss of his eye; and (3) whether or not the award of attorney's fees was proper. We think that there was sufficient evidence to support the findings of fact as to each issue and that the Board and the referee correctly applied the law. See Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Bond Transport, Inc., 22 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 86, 90, 347 A.2d 788, 791 (1975) which held that neither the compensation authorities nor the courts should be solicitous to find contractorship rather than employment; Hershey Estates v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board, 9 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 470, 473, 308 A.2d 637, 639 (1973) which held that the test is whether the injured eye was lost for all practical intents and purposes; and Ball v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board, 19 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 157, 159-60, 340 A.2d 610, 611 (1975) which held that the award of attorney's fees is the rule in these cases and their exclusion is the exception to be applied in cases in which the record establishes that the employer's contest is reasonably based. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the Board.
Order
And Now, this 1st day of November, 1978, thé order of the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board in the above-captioned matter is affirmed, and judgment is entered in favor of James H. King and against Mill-vale Sportsmen's Club, Inc., for the loss of-the claimant's left eye. Compensation for the healing period shall be paid at the rate of $106.00 per week for the period from April 8, 1974 to June 2, 1974, inclusive. Compensation for loss of the eye shall be paid at the rate of $106.00 per week beginning June 3, 1974, and continuing thereafter for a period of 275 weeks. The employer is also ordered to pay the following medical expenses:
Eye and Ear Hospital . $706.90
• Krieger & McVay Associates...... 580.00
Drugs prescribed . 80.00
The employer is also ordered to pay attorney's fees at the rate of 20 per cent to Martin Lubow, Esq. Interest ón the above award shall be paid in accordance with the statutory rate.