Case Name: MARY H. THOMPSON v. HENRY LEERBURGER
Court: New York Court of Common Pleas
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1888-04-02
Citations: 15 N.Y. St. Rep. 1020
Docket Number: 
Parties: MARY H. THOMPSON v. HENRY LEERBURGER.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 15
Pages: 1020–1020

Head Matter:
MARY H. THOMPSON v. HENRY LEERBURGER.

Opinion:
J.F. Daly, J.
—It does not appear that any question decisive of the case was overlooked by the court, or that the decision is inconsistent with any statute or controlling decision. Rule 16, Com. Pl. Rules; Curley v. Tomlinson, 5 Daly, 283. There is no evidence that the court overlooked section 3221 of the Code in disposing of this appeal. That section applies in a case like this one and the judgment was correct.
The motion for re-argument, or for leave to appeal to the court of appeals, must be denied, with ten dollars costs.