Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roland G. TORRES, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-04-15
Citations: 95 F. App'x 232
Docket Number: No. 02-10205
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Roland G. TORRES, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 95
Pages: 232–232

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Roland G. TORRES, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 02-10205.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 12, 2004.
Decided April 15, 2004.
Chris A. Thomas, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Honolulu, HI, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, RYMER, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Roland G. Torres appeals his jury-trial conviction and 70-month sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Torres has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Torres has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.