Case Name: Steven NIEBRZYDOSKI, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-09-26
Citations: 207 S.W.3d 149
Docket Number: No. ED 87484
Parties: Steven NIEBRZYDOSKI, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before BOOKER T. SHAW, C.J., PATRICIA L. COHEN, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 207
Pages: 149–149

Head Matter:
Steven NIEBRZYDOSKI, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 87484.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Sept. 26, 2006.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 26, 2006.
Application for Transfer Denied Dec. 19, 2006.
Matthew M. Ward, Assistant Public Defender, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before BOOKER T. SHAW, C.J., PATRICIA L. COHEN, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Steven Niebrzydoski ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion after an evidentiary hearing. Movant was found guilty by a jury of possession of a controlled substance with the intent to distribute. He was sentenced as a prior and persistent drug offender to ten years' imprisonment. This Court affirmed his convictions in State v. Niebrzydoski, 151 S.W.3d 836 (Mo.App. E.D.2004). We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court's decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the award pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).