Case Name: Patrick D. MOORE, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-09-04
Citations: 377 S.W.3d 610
Docket Number: No. ED 97925
Parties: Patrick D. MOORE, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., C.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 377
Pages: 610–611

Head Matter:
Patrick D. MOORE, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 97925.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Sept. 4, 2012.
Roxanna A. Mason, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Richard A. Starnes, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., C.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Patrick Moore, Jr. appeals the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court did not err in denying Moore's claim for ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).