Case Name: Kent et al. v. Frost
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1924-10-07
Citations: 32 Ga. App. 764
Docket Number: 15585
Parties: Kent et al. v. Frost.
Judges: Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 32
Pages: 764–765

Head Matter:
15585.
Kent et al. v. Frost.
Decided October 7, 1924.

Opinion:
Luke, J.
1. In a garnishment proceeding, where indebtedness is admitted to the defendant, a claimant cannot legally obtain judgment in his favor without traversing the answer of the garnishee. Booth v. Brooke, 6 Ga. App. 299 (64 S. E. 1103). The court properly directed a verdict for the plaintiff in fl. fa.
2. Neither upon the ground of newly discovered evidence nor for any reason assigned did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.
Claim; from Treutlen superior court — J-udge Graham. April 7, 1924.
W. B. Kent, for plaintiffs in error.
B. B. Jackson, contra.