Case Name: Barbara Pryer et al., Infants, by Their Guardian ad Litem, Charles Pryer, et al., Respondents, v. Eddie Henderson, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1959-12-18
Citations: 21 Misc. 2d 256
Docket Number: 
Parties: Barbara Pryer et al., Infants, by Their Guardian ad Litem, Charles Pryer, et al., Respondents, v. Eddie Henderson, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 21
Pages: 256–256

Head Matter:
Barbara Pryer et al., Infants, by Their Guardian ad Litem, Charles Pryer, et al., Respondents, v. Eddie Henderson, Appellant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
December 18, 1959.
Doran & Goerlich (Harold L. Goerlich of counsel), for appellant.
Gelfand <§> Shedler (Burton W. Stone of counsel), for respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The Nassau County District Court is a court not of record (Judiciary Law, § 2) and therefore did not have power to order a discovery and inspection pursuant to the provisions of section 324 of the Civil Practice Act; and such power is not specifically conferred on it by any provision of the Nassau County District Court Act.
The order should be unanimously reversed upon the law, with $10 costs to defendant and motion denied. The court was without power to make the order appealed from.
Concur — Pette, Di Giovanna and Brown, JJ.
Order reversed, etc.