Case Name: Larry TOTTEN; et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. VALENTINE CORPORATION, general contractor; et al., Defendants, and Richard D. Gentry; et al., Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-12-14
Citations: 155 F. App'x 987
Docket Number: No. 04-15634; D.C. No. CV-03-00198-WHA
Parties: Larry TOTTEN; et al., Plaintiffs—Appellees, v. VALENTINE CORPORATION, general contractor; et al., Defendants, and Richard D. Gentry; et al., Defendants—Appellants.
Judges: Before BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 155
Pages: 987–988

Head Matter:
Larry TOTTEN; et al., Plaintiffs—Appellees, v. VALENTINE CORPORATION, general contractor; et al., Defendants, and Richard D. Gentry; et al., Defendants—Appellants.
No. 04-15634.
D.C. No. CV-03-00198-WHA.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 8, 2005.
Decided Dec. 14, 2005.
Shirley A. Lee, Esq., Weinberg, Roger & Rosenfeld, Pasadena, CA, for PlaintiffsAppellees.
Dennis J. Byrne, Law Offices of Dennis J. Byrne, Santa Rosa, CA, for Defendants-Appellants.
Before BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
We affirm for the reasons set forth in the district court's March 8, 2004 order granting appellees' motion for summary judgment.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.