Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Chevelle CROWDER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-05-01
Citations: 472 F. App'x 156
Docket Number: No. 12-6173
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Chevelle CROWDER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 472
Pages: 156–157

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Chevelle CROWDER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-6173.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 26, 2012.
Decided: May 1, 2012.
Chevelle Crowder, Appellant Pro Se. Charlene Rene Day, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Chevelle Crowder appeals the district court's order denying his motion to reconsider the denial of his motion seeking a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006). As we have recognized, however, a district-court has no authority to grant a motion to reconsider its previous order denying a 3582(c) motion. United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir.2010). And in any event, it is evident from the record that Crowder is ineligible for the sentence reduction that he seeks. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. United States v. Crowder, No. 4:08-cr-00002-JLK-2, 2012 WL 244481 (W.D.Va. Jan. 26, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.