Case Name: William Scott DAVIS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James A. HUNT, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-11-29
Citations: 671 F. App'x 93
Docket Number: No. 16-2010
Parties: William Scott DAVIS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James A. HUNT, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 671
Pages: 93–93

Head Matter:
William Scott DAVIS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James A. HUNT, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 16-2010
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: November 22, 2016
Decided: November 29, 2016
William Scott Davis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
William Scott Davis, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reconsideration in a closed 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. Hunt, No. 5:11-cv-00035-D (E.D.N.C. Aug. 8, 2016). We deny Davis' motions to remand and to appoint a guardian ad litem. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED