Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Craig RUSSELL, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-07-18
Citations: 189 F. App'x 932
Docket Number: No. 05-16593
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Craig RUSSELL, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before TJOFLAT, CARNES and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 189
Pages: 932–933

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Craig RUSSELL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-16593
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
July 18, 2006.
Robert O. Davis, E. Bryan Wilson, Tallahassee, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Gwendolyn L. Spivey, Federal Defender Office, Randolph P. Murrell, Federal Public Defender, William Rourk Clark, Jr., Office of the Federal Public Defender, Tallahssee, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before TJOFLAT, CARNES and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
This appeal presents one issue: whether supervised release standard condition No. 13 delegates a judicial function to the district court's probation office. We resolved this issue in United, States v. Nash, 438 F.3d 1302, 1306 (11th Cir.2006). "Standard Condition Thirteen . does not improperly delegate a judicial function to a probation officer...." Id. at 1306.
AFFIRMED.
. The mandate in Nash issued on April 14, 2006.