Case Name: H. R. Mallinson & Co., Inc., Appellant, v. Joseph Gluck, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Pagoda Textile Mills, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1930-12
Citations: 231 A.D. 813
Docket Number: 
Parties: H. R. Mallinson & Co., Inc., Appellant, v. Joseph Gluck, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Pagoda Textile Mills, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 231
Pages: 813–813

Head Matter:
H. R. Mallinson & Co., Inc., Appellant, v. Joseph Gluck, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Pagoda Textile Mills, Respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The order is affirmed as a matter of discretion, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. We think that the question as to whether the use of the term " Pagoda " was an infringement of plaintiff's right should await the trial. Present — Dowling, P. J., Merrell, Finch, McAvoy and Sherman, JJ. Order affirmed as a matter of discretion, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.