Case Name: MISSOURI UNION OF LAW ENFORCEMENT LOCAL NO. 57, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF HAZELWOOD, et al., Defendants-Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-04-02
Citations: 81 S.W.3d 74
Docket Number: No. ED 80002
Parties: MISSOURI UNION OF LAW ENFORCEMENT LOCAL NO. 57, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF HAZELWOOD, et al., Defendants-Respondents.
Judges: Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 81
Pages: 74–74

Head Matter:
MISSOURI UNION OF LAW ENFORCEMENT LOCAL NO. 57, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF HAZELWOOD, et al., Defendants-Respondents.
No. ED 80002.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
April 2, 2002.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 28, 2002.
Application for Transfer Denied Aug. 27, 2002.
John H. Goffstein, St. Louis, MO, for appellants.
Kevin M. O’Keefe, Clayton, MO, for respondents.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The appellants, Missouri Union of Law Enforcement Local No. 57, Kenneth Un-ger, Marcella Unger, and Russell Craven, appeal the trial court's grant of summary judgment regarding Hazelwood municipal charter provisions restricting political activity by city employees. No error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(5).