Case Name: In the Matter of Kingdon Gould, Jr., et al., Appellants, v. Robert A. Kerwick, as Assessor of the Town of Hardenburgh, et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1982-07-15
Citations: 89 A.D.2d 695
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Kingdon Gould, Jr., et al., Appellants, v Robert A. Kerwick, as Assessor of the Town of Hardenburgh, et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 89
Pages: 695–696

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Kingdon Gould, Jr., et al., Appellants, v Robert A. Kerwick, as Assessor of the Town of Hardenburgh, et al., Respondents.

Opinion:
Motion for reargument denied, without costs. Motion for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted, without costs. No issue of fact was considered by this court. Pursuant to CPLR 5713, this court certifies that the following question of law, decisive of the correctness of its determination, has arisen, which in its opinion ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals: "Did this Court err, as a matter of law, in reversing so much of Special Term's judgment and order as dismissed the 'second proceeding,' and in denying respondents' motion with respect to said proceeding?" Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Casey, Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.