Case Name: Danny STRADFORD, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1992-09-01
Citations: 837 S.W.2d 363
Docket Number: No. 60922
Parties: Danny STRADFORD, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 837
Pages: 363–363

Head Matter:
Danny STRADFORD, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. 60922.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Sept. 1, 1992.
Lew Kollias, Columbia, for appellant.
William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant appeals from the denial of his rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).