Case Name: Brian MOORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-04-17
Citations: 43 S.W.3d 454
Docket Number: No. ED 77858
Parties: Brian MOORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., MARY RHODES RUSSELL, J., and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 43
Pages: 454–454

Head Matter:
Brian MOORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 77858.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
April 17, 2001.
Raymund J. Capelovitch, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon,, Atty. Gen., Susan L. Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., MARY RHODES RUSSELL, J., and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing.
The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact and conclusions of law that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).