Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Howard HUDSON, a/k/a Nort, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-04-07
Citations: 320 F. App'x 184
Docket Number: No. 08-6624
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Howard HUDSON, a/k/a Nort, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 320
Pages: 184–184

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Howard HUDSON, a/k/a Nort, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-6624.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 10, 2009.
Decided: April 7, 2009.
Michael T. Clifford, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. J. Patrick Rowan, Assistant Attorney General, Michael Mul-laney, John W. Van Lonkhuyzen, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
John Howard Hudson timely appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), and motion to supplement. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Hudson, No. 2:99-cr-00048-1 (S.D.W.Va. Apr. 1, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.