Case Name: Anthony Komar, Respondent, v. Dun & Bradstreet Co., Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant. Dun & Bradstreet Co., Inc., et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. A. Greene Co., Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1954-07-22
Citations: 284 A.D. 804
Docket Number: 
Parties: Anthony Komar, Respondent, v. Dun & Bradstreet Co., Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant. Dun & Bradstreet Co., Inc., et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. A. Greene Co., Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 284
Pages: 804–805

Head Matter:
(July 22, 1954.)
(Republished.)
Anthony Komar, Respondent, v. Dun & Bradstreet Co., Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant. Dun & Bradstreet Co., Inc., et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. A. Greene Co., Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

Opinion:
'Judgment modified by reversing that part thereof which grants judgment in favor of plaintiff against defendants, with costs, and the complaint dismissed, with costs and, as so modified, affirmed. Present — Dore, J. P., Callahan, Breitel, Bastow and Botein, JJ. Opinion by Callahan, J. Breitel and Bastow, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse and order a new trial unless plaintiff stipulates to reduce the verdict to $60,000 in which event the judgment, as so modified, is affirmed; dissenting opinion by Bastow, J. Order filed.
[Also printed ante, p. 538.— Rep.]