Case Name: NASHVILLE TRUST CO. v. COTROS et al.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1941-08-15
Citations: 122 F.2d 326
Docket Number: No. 8641
Parties: NASHVILLE TRUST CO. v. COTROS et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 122
Pages: 326–326

Head Matter:
NASHVILLE TRUST CO. v. COTROS et al.
No. 8641.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Aug. 15, 1941.
Writ of Certiorari Denied Nov. 10, 1941.
See -U.S. -, 62 S.Ct. 181, 86 L.Ed; -.
Supplemental opinion.
For original opinion, see 120 F.2d 157.
William L. Cary, Sp. Asst, to Atty. Gen. (Samuel O. Clark, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Sewall Key and William L. Cary, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., and Horace Frierson, Jr., and A. O. Denning, both of Nashville, Tenn., on the brief), for appellant.
R. L. Bartels and F. E. Hagler, both of Memphis, Tenn., for appellees.
Before SIMONS, ALLEN, and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
SIMONS, Circuit Judge.
It appearing that the judgment in the above cause which we reversed by an opinion announced June 5, 1941, 120 F.2d 157, included not only a refund of capital stock taxes in respect to which we concluded the judgment to be erroneous, but also a refund of excess profits taxes to the return of which the Government conceded the taxpayer to be entitled, and that our direction for mandate was that the judgment be reversed without qualification;
Now, therefore, it is ordered that the direction for mandate in our opinion is amended to read as follows: "The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings and for the entry of a judgment for the appellees for that' portion of the tax paid by the appellees which represents payment of Excess Profits taxes conceded to have been erroneously collected, together with interest as provided by law."
It is further ordered that the mandate be recalled and that a new mandate issue in conformity with the amended opinion.