Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William MONTGOMERY, a/k/a William C. Montgomery, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-08-27
Citations: 343 F. App'x 885
Docket Number: No. 09-6158
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. William MONTGOMERY, a/k/a William C. Montgomery, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 343
Pages: 885–886

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. William MONTGOMERY, a/k/a William C. Montgomery, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 09-6158.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 29, 2009.
Decided: Aug. 27, 2009.
William Montgomery, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen David Schiller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
William Montgomery appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Montgomery, No. 3:03-cr-00216-JRS-2 (E.D.Va. Jan. 14, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.