Case Name: In the Matter of Philip L. Haberstro, Appellant, v. Martin T. Scholl et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1995-03-17
Citations: 213 A.D.2d 1082
Docket Number: Appeal No. 2
Parties: In the Matter of Philip L. Haberstro, Appellant, v Martin T. Scholl et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 213
Pages: 1082–1082

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Philip L. Haberstro, Appellant, v Martin T. Scholl et al., Respondents.
(Appeal No. 2.)
[625 NYS2d 969]

Opinion:
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs (see, Ciesinski v Town of Aurora, 202 AD2d 984). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Mintz, J.—Settle Record.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Wesley, Davis and Boehm, JJ. (Filed Mar. 8, 1995.)