Case Name: Thomas SEEBER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2007-05-23
Citations: 956 So. 2d 1240
Docket Number: No. 4D07-1624
Parties: Thomas SEEBER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: GUNTHER, HAZOURI and MAY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 956
Pages: 1240–1241

Head Matter:
Thomas SEEBER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D07-1624.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
May 23, 2007.
Arthur B. Brandt of Brandt & Gufford, Stuart, for appellant.
No appearance required for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant filed, without reference to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c), a motion simply titled "Motion to Modify Sentence." The trial court treated the motion as a rule 3.800(c) motion and, after the sixty-day jurisdictional window expired, denied the motion for lack of jurisdiction. We dismiss the appeal as a non-appealable order. See State v. Woodard, 866 So.2d 120 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); Grosse v. State, 511 So.2d 688 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), rev. denied, 519 So.2d 987 (Fla.1988).
GUNTHER, HAZOURI and MAY, JJ., concur.