Case Name: Stanley V. Tucker v. Pace Investments Associates et al.
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1990-04-19
Citations: 21 Conn. App. 739
Docket Number: 8504
Parties: Stanley V. Tucker v. Pace Investments Associates et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Appellate Reports
Volume: 21
Pages: 821–821

Head Matter:
Stanley V. Tucker v. Pace Investments Associates et al.
(8504)
Borden, O’Connell and Foti, Js.
Argued April 10
decision released April 19, 1990
Stanley V. Tucker, pro se, the appellant (plaintiff).
PaulD. Buhl, with whom were I. Milton Widem and, on the brief, Charles F. Corcoran III and Robert E. Pace, for the appellees (named defendant et al.).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This case must be dismissed because of a lack of a final judgment for purposes of appeal. See Practice Book § 4002 (d) and (e).
The appeal is dismissed.