Case Name: Peter J. Poels et al., Copartners under the Firm Name of Poels & Brewster, Appellants, v. Charles E. Merrill et al., Copartners under the Firm Name of Merrill, Lynch & Co., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1927-12-16
Citations: 246 N.Y. 647
Docket Number: 
Parties: Peter J. Poels et al., Copartners under the Firm Name of Poels & Brewster, Appellants, v. Charles E. Merrill et al., Copartners under the Firm Name of Merrill, Lynch & Co., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 246
Pages: 647–648

Head Matter:
Peter J. Poels et al., Copartners under the Firm Name of Poels & Brewster, Appellants, v. Charles E. Merrill et al., Copartners under the Firm Name of Merrill, Lynch & Co., Respondents.
(Argued December 1, 1927;
decided December 16, 1927.)
Almet Reed Latson, Matthew Spalletta and John Kenneth Byard for appellants.
Herman Aaron and Stanhope Foster for respondents.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed, with costs, upon the ground that there is no evidence of any false representations binding on the defendants.
Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrews, Lehman, Kellogg and O'Brien, JJ.