Case Name: Joel Teig et al., Respondents, v. Nissequogue Golf Club, Inc., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1997-07-07
Citations: 241 A.D.2d 448
Docket Number: 
Parties: Joel Teig et al., Respondents, v Nissequogue Golf Club, Inc., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 241
Pages: 448–449

Head Matter:
Joel Teig et al., Respondents, v Nissequogue Golf Club, Inc., Appellant.
[663 NYS2d 830]

Opinion:
In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Seidell, J.), dated June 11, 1996, as directed the defendant to "fully and completely" comply with a prior order directing discovery.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The propriety of the disclosure device fashioned by the court is not properly before this Court, since use of that disclosure device was directed in a prior order of the same court dated September 29, 1995, from which no appeal was taken (see, Damen v North Shore Univ. Hosp., 234 AD2d 255). In any event, the defendant's contentions are without merit. Bracken, J. P., O'Brien, Santucci, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.