Case Name: HOWARD CURTIS, RESPONDENT, v. CHARLES E. JOYCE, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1918-01-31
Citations: 91 N.J.L. 685
Docket Number: 
Parties: HOWARD CURTIS, RESPONDENT, v. CHARLES E. JOYCE, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 91
Pages: 685–686

Head Matter:
HOWARD CURTIS, RESPONDENT, v. CHARLES E. JOYCE, APPELLANT.
Argued November 26, 1917
Decided January 31, 1918.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 90 N. J. L. 47.
For the respondent, V. Claude Palmer.
For the appellant, James Mercer Davis.

Opinion:
Pee Cubiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Swayze in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Garrison, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, JJ. 9.
For reversal — None.