Case Name: Brock, Appellant, v. Niemeyer, Judge, et al., Appellees
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2011-09-21
Citations: 130 Ohio St. 3d 80
Docket Number: No. 2011-0470
Parties: Brock, Appellant, v. Niemeyer, Judge, et al., Appellees.
Judges: O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 130
Pages: 80–80

Head Matter:
Brock, Appellant, v. Niemeyer, Judge, et al., Appellees.
[Cite as Brock v. Niemeyer, 130 Ohio St.3d 80, 2011-Ohio-4704.]
(No. 2011-0470
Submitted September 7, 2011
Decided September 21, 2011.)
Dennis R. Brock, pro se.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment dismissing the complaint and denying the motion of appellant, Dennis R. Brock, to allow his cause to proceed. Brock's complaint alleged violations of his civil rights pursuant to R.C. 2921.52(E). Brock's complaint invoked neither the original nor the appellate jurisdiction of the court of appeals. Section 3(B)(1) and (2), Article IV, Ohio Constitution. We also deny appellant's motions for leave to correct and to direct the appellate court to attach requested documents.
Judgment affirmed.
O'Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.