Case Name: John Timothy SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lacorick BRIDGES; South Carolina Department of Corrections, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-10-06
Citations: 202 F. App'x 627
Docket Number: No. 06-6666
Parties: John Timothy SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lacorick BRIDGES; South Carolina Department of Corrections, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 202
Pages: 627–628

Head Matter:
John Timothy SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lacorick BRIDGES; South Carolina Department of Corrections, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 06-6666.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 28, 2006.
Decided: Oct. 6, 2006.
John Timothy Smith, Appellant Pro Se. James Victor McDade, Doyle, O’Rourke, Tate & McDade, PA, Anderson, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
John Timothy Smith appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Bridges, No. 2:04-cv-23334-PMD (D.S.C. Oct. 21, 2005). We deny Smith's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.