Case Name: A. C. DALMAN, Appellant, v. Earl PERIGO, Appellee
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1952-12-19
Citations: 62 So. 2d 36
Docket Number: 
Parties: A. C. DALMAN, Appellant, v. Earl PERIGO, Appellee.
Judges: SEBRING, C. J., and TERRELL and MATHEWS, JJ., and WHITE, Associate Justice, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 62
Pages: 36–36

Head Matter:
A. C. DALMAN, Appellant, v. Earl PERIGO, Appellee.
Supreme Court of Florida, Special Division A.
Dec. 19, 1952.
Garland M. Budd, Thomas E. Lee and Walsh & Walsh, Miami, for appellant.
Fowler, White, Gillen, Yancey & Hum-key, Walter Humkey and Richard B. Adams, Miami, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The record and the briefs in this cause have been examined. The point for determination is whether or not the evidence in support of negligence, gross negligence and wilful or wanton misconduct and proximate cause should have been submitted to the jury.
Our examination reveals no reversible error so the judgment appealed from is affirmed. Cormier v. Williams, 148 Fla. 201, 4 So.2d 525.
Affirmed.
SEBRING, C. J., and TERRELL and MATHEWS, JJ., and WHITE, Associate Justice, concur.