Case Name: Dan NICHOLS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jack McCORMICK, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1991-10-08
Citations: 946 F.2d 695
Docket Number: No. 90-35416
Parties: Dan NICHOLS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jack McCORMICK, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before BROWNING, WRIGHT and FARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 946
Pages: 695–710

Head Matter:
Dan NICHOLS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jack McCORMICK, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 90-35416.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Oct. 8, 1991.
Wendy Holton, Helena, Mont., for petitioner-appellant.
Elizabeth S. Baker, Asst. Atty. Gen., Helena, Mont., for respondent-appellee.
Before BROWNING, WRIGHT and FARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
The panel has voted to deny appellant's petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc.
The full court was advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc. An active judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed.R.App.P. 35.
The petition for rehearing is denied and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is rejected.
NORRIS, Circuit Judge, dissents from the failure of the court to rehear the case en banc.