Case Name: Carol A. FORTI, a/k/a Carol Ann Forti, Debtor-Appellant, v. Andrew S. ROSS, Creditor-Appellee, Thomas P. Gorman, Chapter 13 Trustee, Trustee-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-04-22
Citations: 518 F. App'x 221
Docket Number: No. 12-2383
Parties: Carol A. FORTI, a/k/a Carol Ann Forti, Debtor-Appellant, v. Andrew S. ROSS, Creditor-Appellee, Thomas P. Gorman, Chapter 13 Trustee, Trustee-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 518
Pages: 221–222

Head Matter:
Carol A. FORTI, a/k/a Carol Ann Forti, Debtor-Appellant, v. Andrew S. ROSS, Creditor-Appellee, Thomas P. Gorman, Chapter 13 Trustee, Trustee-Appellee.
No. 12-2383.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 18, 2013.
Decided: April 22, 2013.
Carol A. Forti, Appellant Pro Se. George E. Tuttle, Jr., Alexandria, Virginia; Eva Choi, Office of the Chapter 13 Trustee, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Carol A. Forti appeals from the district court's order denying her motion for a stay of the disbursement of funds in her bankruptcy case pending appeal. All funds of the bankruptcy estate have now been distributed and a discharge granted. Accordingly, this appeal is moot. See In re Stadium Mgt. Corp., 895 F.2d 845, 847 (1st Cir.1990) ("Absent a stay, the court must dismiss a pending appeal as moot because the court has no remedy that it can fashion even if it would have determined the issues differently"). We deny Forti's pending motions and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.