Case Name: Demetric Gray PEARSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mary Ann SAAR, Secretary, D.P.S.C.S.; William Sondervan, Commissioner of Corrections, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-09-28
Citations: 201 F. App'x 165
Docket Number: No. 05-7304
Parties: Demetric Gray PEARSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mary Ann SAAR, Secretary, D.P.S.C.S.; William Sondervan, Commissioner of Corrections, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 201
Pages: 165–165

Head Matter:
Demetric Gray PEARSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mary Ann SAAR, Secretary, D.P.S.C.S.; William Sondervan, Commissioner of Corrections, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 05-7304.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 26, 2006.
Decided: Sept. 28, 2006.
Demetric Gray Pearson, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Demetric Gray Pearson appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Pearson v. Saar, No. CA-03-1705-RDB (D.Md. July 28, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.