Case Name: Bismark Kwaku TORKORNOO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Nina HELWIG, Esq.; John C. Monahan, Esq.; Mary Torkornoo; Jacqueline Emanga Ngole, Esq., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-08-25
Citations: 696 F. App'x 631
Docket Number: No. 17-1674
Parties: Bismark Kwaku TORKORNOO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Nina HELWIG, Esq.; John C. Monahan, Esq.; Mary Torkornoo; Jacqueline Emanga Ngole, Esq., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 696
Pages: 631–631

Head Matter:
Bismark Kwaku TORKORNOO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Nina HELWIG, Esq.; John C. Monahan, Esq.; Mary Torkornoo; Jacqueline Emanga Ngole, Esq., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 17-1674
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: August 17, 2017
Decided: August 25, 2017
Bismark Kwaku Torkornoo, Appellant Pro Se.
Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Bismark Kwaku Torkornoo seeks to appeal the district court's order granting in part and denying in part his motion to enforce this Court's judgment and mandate. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Torkornoo seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with' oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED