Case Name: Floyd FARMER, Adm'r, Appellant, v. LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellee; Willie FARMER, Adm'r, Appellant, v. LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1959-02-28
Citations: 264 F.2d 248
Docket Number: Nos. 13669, 13670
Parties: Floyd FARMER, Adm’r, Appellant, v. LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellee. Willie FARMER, Adm’r, Appellant, v. LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellee.
Judges: Before MARTIN, Chief Judge, SIMONS, Circuit Judge, and MATHES, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 264
Pages: 248–248

Head Matter:
Floyd FARMER, Adm’r, Appellant, v. LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellee. Willie FARMER, Adm’r, Appellant, v. LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellee.
Nos. 13669, 13670.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
Feb. 28, 1959.
Fyke Farmer, Nashville, Tenn., for appellants.
Hooker, Keeble, Dodson & Harris, Nashville, Tenn., Charles Willett, Springfield, Tenn., for appellee.
Before MARTIN, Chief Judge, SIMONS, Circuit Judge, and MATHES, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
These consolidated appeals came on to be heard on the record and on the briefs and oral arguments of attorneys for the contending parties;
And it appearing that there was substantial evidence to support the jury verdicts in favor of. the defendant and that no reversible error inheres in the conduct of the trial by the district judge, or in his charge to the jury; and it appearing further that there is no valid ground for the granting of a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence;
The judgment of the district court in each case is affirmed.