Case Name: Anna Imperatrice, Respondent, v. Antonio Imperatrice et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1948-07-16
Citations: 298 N.Y. 549
Docket Number: 
Parties: Anna Imperatrice, Respondent, v. Antonio Imperatrice et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.
Judges: LoughraN, Ch. J., Lewis, DesmoNd, Thacher, Dye and Fuld, JJ., concur; CoNway, J., taking no part.
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 298
Pages: 549–550

Head Matter:
Anna Imperatrice, Respondent, v. Antonio Imperatrice et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.
Argued June 1, 1948;
decided July 16, 1948.
George Mehlman for appellants.
Irving L. Young and Alfred M. Schaffer for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Since the first cause of action, sounding in equity, is valid and since defendants' motion under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice seeks dismissal of the entire complaint, the motion was properly denied. (See Advance Music Corp. v. American Tobacco Co., 296 N. Y. 79, 84; Eidlitz v. Fischbach & Moore, Inc., 239 App. Div. 483, 486; Fusco v. Brooks, 263 App. Div. 845.) We neither consider nor pass upon the sufficiency of the other causes of action,' nor the nature of the judgment to which plaintiff may be entitled.
The order should be affirmed, costs. The question certified should be answered in the affirmative.
LoughraN, Ch. J., Lewis, DesmoNd, Thacher, Dye and Fuld, JJ., concur; CoNway, J., taking no part.
Order affirmed, etc.