Case Name: Randolph E. WARREN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2006-11-29
Citations: 942 So. 2d 465
Docket Number: No. 4D05-4779
Parties: Randolph E. WARREN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: GROSS, HAZOURI, JJ., and MAASS, ELIZABETH T., Associate Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 942
Pages: 465–465

Head Matter:
Randolph E. WARREN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D05-4779.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Nov. 29, 2006.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Tom Wm. Odom, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Thomas A. Palmer, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have considered the prosecutor's comment in closing argument in light of Rodriguez v. State, 753 So.2d 29, 37 (Fla.2000), and conclude the comment was not directed at a point which only the defendant could contradict. Therefore, we affirm.
GROSS, HAZOURI, JJ., and MAASS, ELIZABETH T., Associate Judge, concur.