Case Name: Ernest Spohn v. The State
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1918-04-03
Citations: 83 Tex. Crim. 219
Docket Number: No. 4968
Parties: Ernest Spohn v. The State.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Criminal Reports
Volume: 83
Pages: 219–219

Head Matter:
Ernest Spohn v. The State.
No. 4968.
Decided April 3, 1918.
Bape—Statement of Facts—Bills of Exception.
In the absence of a statement of facts and hills of exceptions, refused requested charges on the grounds of the motion for new trial can not be considered on appeal.
Appeal from the Criminal District Court' of Dallas No. 2. Tried below before the Hon. C. A.-Pippen.
Appeal from a conviction, of rape; penalty, five years imprisonment in the penitentiary.
The opinion states the ease.
No brief on file for appellant.
E. B. Hendricks, Assistant Attorney Genera, for the State.

Opinion:
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
Appellant was convicted of rape, his punishment bping assessed at five years confinement in the penitentiary.
The record contains neither a statement of facts nor bill of exceptions. There were four special charges refused. In the absence of the evidence we are unable to determine whether the court erred in refusing them. The grounds of the motion for new trial can not be considered. For want of the testimony and reserved exceptions the judgment will be affirmed.
Affirmed.