Case Name: James WOHL and Samuel Patent, d/b/a, Major Associates, Appellants, v. HARRY RICH CORPORATION, a Florida Corporation, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1980-07-01
Citations: 385 So. 2d 170
Docket Number: No. 79-2084
Parties: James WOHL and Samuel Patent, d/b/a, Major Associates, Appellants, v. HARRY RICH CORPORATION, a Florida Corporation, Appellee.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 385
Pages: 170–171

Head Matter:
James WOHL and Samuel Patent, d/b/a, Major Associates, Appellants, v. HARRY RICH CORPORATION, a Florida Corporation, Appellee.
No. 79-2084.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 1, 1980.
Smathers & Thompson and Maria E. Aris-ta, Miami, for appellants.
Kavanaugh & Leiby and Larry R. Leiby and Carlos M. Hernandez, Miami, for appel-lee.
Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Bruce Construction Corporation v. Federal Realty Corporation, 104 Fla. 93, 139 So. 209 (1932); Vassar v. State, 139 Fla. 213, 190 So. 434 (1939); Dadswell v. State, 186 So.2d 274 (Fla.2d DCA 1966); Joe Hatton, Inc. v. Conner, 247 So.2d 782 (Fla.4th DCA 1971); CIC Leasing Corp. v. Dade Linen and Furniture Co., 279 So.2d 73 (Fla.3d DCA 1973); Mart v. Leibman, 281 So.2d 367 (Fla.3d DCA 1973); Bali v. Papp, 317 So.2d 801 (Fla.4th DCA 1975).