Case Name: Kelly v. Wheeler et al.
Court: New York Supreme Court General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1888-12-13
Citations: 3 N.Y.S. 289
Docket Number: 
Parties: Kelly v. Wheeler et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 3
Pages: 289–290

Head Matter:
Kelly v. Wheeler et al.
(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department.
December 13,1888.)
Constitutional Law—Taxation—City of Bbooklyn.
Laws It. Y. 1883, c. 114, relating to reassessment of city taxes in the city of Brooklyn is constitutional. Following Terrill v. Wheeler, 3 N. Y. Supp. 86. ‘
Appeal from circuit court, Kings county.
Argued before Barnard, P. J., and Dykman and Pratt, JJ.
A. H. & W. E. Osborn, for appellants. Hurd & Grim, for respondent, i»

Opinion:
Pratt, J.
So far as it can be done by this general term, the constitpjtipqT ality of the act of 1883, c. 114, was settled by the case of Terrill v. Wheeler 2 N. Y. Supp. 86, (decided June, 1888.) We are bound by that decision, and it requires the affirmance of the j udgment appealed from. It is argued; by apr pellants that the notices proved are not sufficiently specific in describing the lands affected, and the owners of the lands'. We are not of that opinion, and must affirm the judgment.