Case Name: Carl E. WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. DYSON & COMPANY and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, both corporations, and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1966-12-07
Citations: 196 So. 2d 108
Docket Number: No. 35316
Parties: Carl E. WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. DYSON & COMPANY and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, both corporations, and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
Judges: THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ-, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 196
Pages: 108–109

Head Matter:
Carl E. WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. DYSON & COMPANY and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, both corporations, and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
No. 35316.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Dec. 7, 1966.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 8, 1967.
Richard P. Warfield of Levin, Askew, Warfield, Levin & Graff, Pensacola, for petitioner.
J. Nixon Daniel, Jr., and Beggs, Lane, Daniel, Gaines & Davis, Pensacola, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date of February 21, 1966.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, O'CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ-, concur.