Case Name: Pevelyn R. SINKLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CONSECO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee, and CNO Financial Group, Inc., Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-06-14
Citations: 528 F. App'x 370
Docket Number: No. 13-1549
Parties: Pevelyn R. SINKLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CONSECO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee, and CNO Financial Group, Inc., Defendant.
Judges: Before GREGORY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 528
Pages: 370–370

Head Matter:
Pevelyn R. SINKLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CONSECO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee, and CNO Financial Group, Inc., Defendant.
No. 13-1549.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 10, 2013.
Decided: June 14, 2013.
Evelyn R. Sinkler, Appellant Pro Se. David Drake Hudgins, Hudgins Law Firm, Alexandria, Virginia; Andrea Rose Simmons, S.K. Huffer & Associates, PC, Car-mel, Indiana, for Appellee.
Before GREGORY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Evelyn R. Sinkler appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellee on Sinkler's claims regarding a disability income rider to her life insurance policy. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sinkler v. Conseco Life Ins. Co., No. 1:12-cv-00642-CMH-JFA (E.D.Va. Apr. 12, 2013). We also deny as moot the Appellee's motion to dismiss the appeal as prematurely filed. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.