Case Name: AGNES J. BADER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1934-01-05
Citations: 112 N.J.L. 241
Docket Number: 
Parties: AGNES J. BADER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 112
Pages: 241–243

Head Matter:
AGNES J. BADER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Submitted October 27, 1933
Decided January 5, 1934.
For the appellant, William Charlton.
For the respondent, Carr & Carroll (Walter B. Carroll, of counsel).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Heher, Perskie, Van Bus-kirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.