Case Name: The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Cedric ROSS, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1987-07-21
Citations: 509 So. 2d 1338
Docket Number: No. 86-2140
Parties: The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Cedric ROSS, Appellee.
Judges: Before HUBBART, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 509
Pages: 1338–1338

Head Matter:
The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Cedric ROSS, Appellee.
No. 86-2140.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 21, 1987.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Steven T. Scott, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and John H. Lipinski, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellee.
Before HUBBART, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Because the undisputed facts do not establish that the passenger/defendant was in either actual or constructive possession of the recently stolen car, the trial court acted correctly in granting the defendant's sworn motion to dismiss. Baker v. United States, 395 F.2d 368 (8th Cir.1968).
Affirmed.