Case Name: Jack Canter et al., Appellants, v. Norman Mulnick, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1983-09-29
Citations: 60 N.Y.2d 689
Docket Number: 
Parties: Jack Canter et al., Appellants, v Norman Mulnick, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 60
Pages: 689–691

Head Matter:
Jack Canter et al., Appellants, v Norman Mulnick, Respondent.
Decided September 29, 1983
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Jacob Rabinowitz for appellants.
Nathan Cyperstein for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed with costs.
The Appellate Division correctly held that the plaintiffs' affidavit failed to establish the merit of their case, and that the motion to dismiss should have been granted unconditionally (see Stolowitz u Mount Sinai Hosp., 60 NY2d 685).
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons concur.
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.