Case Name: Anthony James BRAXTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Wilbur R. TONEY, Oak Hill City Judge; Dale Payne, Fayette County Magistrate Judge; City of Oak Hill; State of West Virginia, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-01-19
Citations: 119 F. App'x 539
Docket Number: No. 04-6791
Parties: Anthony James BRAXTON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Wilbur R. TONEY, Oak Hill City Judge; Dale Payne, Fayette County Magistrate Judge; City of Oak Hill; State of West Virginia, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 119
Pages: 539–539

Head Matter:
Anthony James BRAXTON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Wilbur R. TONEY, Oak Hill City Judge; Dale Payne, Fayette County Magistrate Judge; City of Oak Hill; State of West Virginia, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 04-6791.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 13, 2005.
Decided: Jan. 19, 2005.
Anthony James Braxton, Appellant pro se.
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Anthony James Braxton appeals the district court's order adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge, denying leave to amend his complaint, and dismissing his action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion or reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Braxton v. Toney, CA-03-638-5 (S.D.W. Va., Mar. 29, 2004 & filed May 17, 2004; entered May 18, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED