Case Name: In the Matter of the Application of John Joseph Tellone for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. JOHN JOSEPH TELLONE, Appellant, v. MAASS, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1988-04-13
Citations: 90 Or. App. 436
Docket Number: 86C-11916; CA A45393
Parties: In the Matter of the Application of John Joseph Tellone for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. JOHN JOSEPH TELLONE, Appellant, v. MAASS, Respondent.
Judges: Before Warden, Presiding Judge, and Van Hoomissen and Graber, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 90
Pages: 436–437

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted March 16,
appeal dismissed April 13, 1988
In the Matter of the Application of John Joseph Tellone for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. JOHN JOSEPH TELLONE, Appellant, v. MAASS, Respondent.
(86C-11916; CA A45393)
752 P2d 354
George E. Price, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.
Philip Schradle, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.
Before Warden, Presiding Judge, and Van Hoomissen and Graber, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Petitioner appeals the dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. At oral argument, petitioner's counsel advised us that petitioner is no longer in defendant's custody. Given that fact, any order requiring defendant to deliver petitioner to the court or release him would be futile. This appeal, therefore, must be dismissed. Rahm v. Keeney, 83 Or App 266, 730 P2d 1297 (1986).
Appeal dismissed.