Case Name: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Andrew Keith ENIMPAH, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2013-10-22
Citations: 621 Pa. 358
Docket Number: No. 335 MAL 2013
Parties: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Andrew Keith ENIMPAH, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 621
Pages: 358–358

Head Matter:
78 A.3d 613
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Andrew Keith ENIMPAH, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Oct. 22, 2013.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 22nd day of October, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by the Commonwealth, is:
Should this Honorable Court grant the Petition for Allowance of Appeal because, the Superior Court has held that [the] Commonwealth has a burden of production at suppression hearings when the [defendant has not satisfied his threshold burden of establishing a reasonable expectation of privacy in the areas searched or the items seized?