Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald Eugene PIERCE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-12-15
Citations: 83 F. App'x 919
Docket Number: No. 02-30272
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald Eugene PIERCE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 83
Pages: 919–920

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald Eugene PIERCE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-30272.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 8, 2003.
Decided Dec. 15, 2003.
Ronald Eugene Pierce, pro se, heridan, OR,for Petitioner-Appellant.
Frank R. Papagni, Jr., Esq., USEU-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Eugene, OR, for Respondent-Appellee.
Before GOODWIN, WALLACE and MCKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously Ends this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Ronald Eugene Pierce appeals pro se the district court's denial of his "petition for lack of jurisdiction under the Commerce Clause." Pierce contends that 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is an unconstitutional exercise of Congress's authority under the Commerce Clause. We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
Ml pending motions are denied.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.