Case Name: STATE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. MORRIS RUDNER, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1919-03-03
Citations: 92 N.J.L. 645
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. MORRIS RUDNER, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 92
Pages: 645–645

Head Matter:
STATE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. MORRIS RUDNER, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
Argued November 27, 1918
Decided March 3, 1919.
On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported m 92 N. J. L. 20.
For the plaintiff in error, A. Dayton Oliphant and Martin P. Devlin.
For the defendant in error, Harry Heher, Aaron V. Dawes and John A. Montgomery.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of the Chief Justice. The supplement thereto by our opinion just filed in State v. Levin (ante p. 553) is applicable also to the present case.
(For dissenting opinion by the Chancellor, see ante p. 555.)
For affirmance — Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Heppenheimer, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 8.
For reversal — The Chancellor, White, Williams, JJ. 3.