Case Name: Gerry S. ENGER, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Daniel LUEPKE, d/b/a Mid-America Outdoorsman Association, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1994-06-28
Citations: 878 S.W.2d 519
Docket Number: No. 64817
Parties: Gerry S. ENGER, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Daniel LUEPKE, d/b/a Mid-America Outdoorsman Association, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, C.J., and PUDLOWSKI and SIMON, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 878
Pages: 519–520

Head Matter:
Gerry S. ENGER, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Daniel LUEPKE, d/b/a Mid-America Outdoorsman Association, Defendant/Appellant.
No. 64817.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
June 28, 1994.
Henry F. Luepke, St. Louis, for appellant.
Gerry S. Enger, pro se.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, C.J., and PUDLOWSKI and SIMON, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Daniel Luepke, appeals from an order entered in the Circuit Court of the County of St. Charles requiring him to refund $300.00 to respondent, Gerry S. Enger, on a membership purchased by respondent in appellant's hunt club. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs and arguments of the parties, as well as the transcripts and the legal file, and find no clear error in the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the trial court. In addition, we find that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We, therefore, affirm the judgement of the trial court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been provided with a memorandum, solely for their own information, setting forth the reasons for our decision.