Case Name: DANIEL A. KERLEY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE MAYOR, &C., OF JERSEY CITY, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1892-06
Citations: 54 N.J.L. 601
Docket Number: 
Parties: DANIEL A. KERLEY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE MAYOR, &C., OF JERSEY CITY, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 54
Pages: 601–601

Head Matter:
DANIEL A. KERLEY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE MAYOR, &C., OF JERSEY CITY, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR.
On error to the Supreme Court.
For the plaintiff in error, Gilbert Collins.
For the defendant in error, William D. Edwards.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given by the court below.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Scudder, Yan Syckel, Werts, Clement. 5.
For reversal — The Chancellor, Magie, Bogert, Smith, Whitaker. 5.