Case Name: Dequan A. HAWKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2018-10-30
Citations: 559 S.W.3d 433
Docket Number: WD 80275
Parties: Dequan A. HAWKINS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 559
Pages: 433–433

Head Matter:
Dequan A. HAWKINS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
WD 80275
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
ORDER FILED: October 30, 2018
Carol D. Jansen, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before Division Three: Gary D. Witt, Presiding Judge, Cynthia L. Martin, Judge and Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judge
ORDER

Opinion:
Per curiam:
Dequan Hawkins appeals from the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 amended motion following an evidentiary hearing. Hawkins asserts that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion for post-conviction relief because he received ineffective assistance of counsel in that his trial counsel failed to object to the admission of a witness's entire videotaped statement to police. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).