Case Name: William C. KEEGAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-03-02
Citations: 127 S.W.3d 715
Docket Number: No. WD 62620
Parties: William C. KEEGAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before HARDWICK, P.J., SPINDEN and NEWTON, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 127
Pages: 715–715

Head Matter:
William C. KEEGAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 62620.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
March 2, 2004.
Susan L. Hogan, Kansas City, for appellant.
Andrea K. Spillars, Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before HARDWICK, P.J., SPINDEN and NEWTON, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
William Keegan appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion, alleging ineffective assistance of his trial counsel. Upon review of the record, we find no error and affirm the motion court's judgment. The parties have been provided with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision because a published opinion would have no precedential value.
Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)