Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jermaine DAVIS, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-03-21
Citations: 14 S.W.3d 665
Docket Number: No. ED 76478
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jermaine DAVIS, Appellant.
Judges: Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 14
Pages: 665–666

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jermaine DAVIS, Appellant.
No. ED 76478.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
March 21, 2000.
Irene Karns, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Krista D. Boston, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Jermaine Davis (Defendant) appeals from the judgments on his convictions for two counts of committing violence against an employee of the Department of Corrections, in violation of section 217.385, RSMo 1994. In his appeal, Defendant contends the trial court erred in failing to, sua sponte, quash the entire venire panel after a venireperson made inflammatory remarks that tainted the whole jury.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).