Case Name: Roff v. Hillhouse et al.
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1897-08-04
Citations: 102 Ga. 589
Docket Number: 
Parties: Roff v. Hillhouse et al.
Judges: All the Justices concurring.
Reporter: Georgia Reports
Volume: 102
Pages: 589–590

Head Matter:
Roff v. Hillhouse et al.

Opinion:
Lumpkin, P. J.
1. When a judge, though not requested so to do, puts his charge in writing and orders it filed, it becomes apart of the record; and where the same is not specified in the bill of exceptions as material to a clear understanding of the errors complained of, a transcript of either the whole charge, or any pertinent portion thereof, may be brought to this court at the instance of the defendant in error.
Argued June 25,
Decided August 4, 1897.
Equitable petition. Before Judge Milner. Catoosa superior court. August term, 1896.
R. J. & J. Me Gamy, E. J. Kiker and W R. Rankin, for plaintiff.
W. H. Dabney and O. N. Starr, for defendants.
2. The charges complained of, when considered in connection with all the instructions given upon the points to which these charges relate, were not erroneous; and the evidence warranted the verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concurring.