Case Name: WINGRA REDI-MIX, INC. d/b/a Wingra Stone Company, Petitioner-Appellant-Petitioner, v. BURIAL SITES PRESERVATION BOARD, Respondent-Respondent, Ho-Chunk Nation, Other Party-Respondent.
Court: Wisconsin Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Wisconsin
Decision Date: 2018-05-22
Citations: 912 N.W.2d 392
Docket Number: No. 2014AP2498
Parties: WINGRA REDI-MIX, INC. d/b/a Wingra Stone Company, Petitioner-Appellant-Petitioner,
v.
BURIAL SITES PRESERVATION BOARD, Respondent-Respondent,
Judges: 
Reporter: North Western Reporter 2d
Volume: 912
Pages: 392–393

Head Matter:
WINGRA REDI-MIX, INC. d/b/a Wingra Stone Company, Petitioner-Appellant-Petitioner,
v.
BURIAL SITES PRESERVATION BOARD, Respondent-Respondent,
Ho-Chunk Nation, Other Party-Respondent.
No. 2014AP2498
Supreme Court of Wisconsin.
Oral Argument: April 17, 2018
Opinion Filed: May 22, 2018
For the petitioner-appellant-petitioner, there were briefs filed by Bryan K. Nowicki, John H. Zawadsky, Amy L. MacArdy, Brittany Lopez Naleid, and Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren S.C., Milwaukee. There was an oral argument by Bryan K. Nowicki.
For the respondent-respondent, there was a brief filed by Maura FJ Whelan, assistant attorney general, and Brad D. Schimel, attorney general. There was an oral argument by Maura FJ Whelan, assistant attorney general.
For the other party-respondent, there was a brief filed by Amanda L. WhiteEagle and Ho-Chunk Nation Dep't of Justice, Black River Falls, with whom on the brief were Howard M. Shanker and The Shanker Law Firm, PLC, Tempe, Arizona. There was an oral argument by Howard M. Shanker.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
¶ 1 The decision of the court of appeals is affirmed by an equally divided court.
¶ 2 DANIEL KELLY, J., withdrew from participation.