Case Name: Jimmy Lane WICOFF v. STATE of Arkansas
Court: Arkansas Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Arkansas
Decision Date: 1991-09-09
Citations: 306 Ark. 401
Docket Number: RC 91-44
Parties: Jimmy Lane WICOFF v. STATE of Arkansas
Judges: 
Reporter: Arkansas Reports
Volume: 306
Pages: 401–402

Head Matter:
Jimmy Lane WICOFF v. STATE of Arkansas
RC 91-44
814 S.W.2d 267
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Opinion delivered September 9, 1991
Christopher O’Hara Carter, for appellant.
No response.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Appellant, Jimmy Lane Wicoff, by his áttor-
ney, Christopher Carter has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late because the ninety-day limit for filing the record in this Court, see Ark. R. App. P. 5(a), was not extended by a new trial motion with respect to which no record was made. See Ark. R. App. P. 4(c).
We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See per curiam dated February 5, 1919, In re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964; Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981).
A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.