Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Victor Santos, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2003-03-24
Citations: 303 A.D.2d 695
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Victor Santos, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 303
Pages: 695–695

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Victor Santos, Respondent.
[756 NYS2d 781]

Opinion:
—Appeal by the People from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Griffin, J.), dated December 11, 2001, as granted that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to dismiss the indictment on the ground of preindictment delay.
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to dismiss the indictment on the ground of preindictment delay is denied, and the indictment is reinstated.
Although the approximately nine-month delay between the defendant's identification as a suspect and his arrest (see People v Papa, 143 AD2d 1058, 1059 [1988]) was to some extent unnecessary, the severity of the underlying offense, the fact that the defendant was not incarcerated on the instant charges, and the lack of any prejudice to the defendant indicate that he was not denied due process (see People v Vernace, 96 NY2d 886, 887 [2001]; People v Taranovich, 37 NY2d 442, 445 [1975]; People v Romero, 173 AD2d 654 [1991]). Moreover, the record indicates that the preindictment investigation of the defendant was undertaken in good faith and the delay did not cause the prosecution to gain a tactical advantage (see People v Vernace, supra at 888; People v Quiroz, 192 AD2d 730 [1993]; People v Papa, supra at 1059). Therefore, the Supreme Court should not have dismissed the indictment. Smith, J.P., McGinity, Cozier and Mastro, JJ., concur.