Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Michael OWENS, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2010-12-14
Citations: 326 S.W.3d 852
Docket Number: No. ED 94228
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Michael OWENS, Appellant.
Judges: Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 326
Pages: 852–852

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Michael OWENS, Appellant.
No. ED 94228.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Dec. 14, 2010.
Edward S. Thompson, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Michael Owens (hereinafter, "Appellant") appeals from the trial court's judgment after a jury convicted him of one count of robbery in the first degree, Section 569.020 RSMo (2000). Appellant was sentenced to ten years' imprisonment. Appellant raises one point on appeal, arguing the trial court abused its discretion when it overruled Appellant's objection to the prosecutor's comments during closing argument about Appellant's prior conviction.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcript on appeal. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in overruling Appellant's objection. State v. Williams, 277 S.W.3d 848, 853 (Mo.App. E.D.2009). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion, only for the use of the parties, setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).