Case Name: AH GOON v. TARPEY and Others
Court: Supreme Court of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1885-06-03
Citations: 2 Cal. Unrep. 483
Docket Number: No. 8633
Parties: AH GOON v. TARPEY and Others.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Unreported Cases
Volume: 2
Pages: 483–484

Head Matter:
AH GOON v. TARPEY and Others.
No. 8633;
June 3, 1885.
7 Pac. 188.
Appeal—Immaterial Variance.—Reversal is not Warranted by-variances between allegations and- proof which are immaterial, if no one is misled thereby.
APPEAL from the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco.
A. A. Moore and Moore & Reed for appellants; T. C. Van Ness for respondent.

Opinion:
By the COURT.
1. The difference in the names Ah Yak and Ah Jack; also as to whether the men were employed to be paid one dollar, or a dollar and a quarter, or a dollar and a half; and the statement in the assignment that the contract was with the Melrose Smelting & Refining Works—if variances, were immaterial, and misled no one: Code Civ. Proc., sec. 469.
2. The court did not err in striking out that portion of the answer relating to garnishment; it contained no defense to the action stated in the complaint.
Judgment and order affirmed.