Case Name: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. Max and Edward SOBEL, Copartners, Doing Business as Sobel Cap Manufacturing Company, Respondents
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1945-11-27
Citations: 151 F.2d 1020
Docket Number: No. 11176
Parties: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. Max and Edward SOBEL, Copartners, Doing Business as Sobel Cap Manufacturing Company, Respondents.
Judges: Before GARRECHT, MATHEWS, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 151
Pages: 1020–1020

Head Matter:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. Max and Edward SOBEL, Copartners, Doing Business as Sobel Cap Manufacturing Company, Respondents.
No. 11176.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov. 27, 1945.
A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, NLRB of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
J. Wesley Cupp, of Los Angeles, Cal., for respondents.
Before GARRECHT, MATHEWS, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This cause coming on for hearing on petition of the National Labor Relations Board, filed November 8, 1945, for entry of a decree of this Court enforcing its order herein of November 5, 1945, and it appearing from the transcript of record in this cause that the respondents consent to entry of such decree of this Court, and that the respondents have been served by an order to show cause issued out of this Court, and have filed no response to such order to show cause and that the time limited in such order to show cause within which a response may be filed has expired, and good cause therefor appearing, it is ordered that a decree of this Court enforcing the order of the National Labor Relations Board herein be forthwith filed and entered, and certified copies thereof issued to the respective parties.