Case Name: Howard M. ACOSTA, Appellant, v. RAHDERT ACOSTA, P.A., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-05-09
Citations: 561 So. 2d 17
Docket Number: No. 89-01396
Parties: Howard M. ACOSTA, Appellant, v. RAHDERT ACOSTA, P.A., Appellee.
Judges: SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 561
Pages: 17–18

Head Matter:
Howard M. ACOSTA, Appellant, v. RAHDERT ACOSTA, P.A., Appellee.
No. 89-01396.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
May 9, 1990.
Michael C. Addison and Cynthia Cloud Bedell of Addison, Ketchey & Horan, P.A., Tampa, for appellant.
Edward D. Foreman, St. Petersburg, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the temporary mandatory injunction entered in this case. No showing was made of an inadequate remedy at law. See Wilson v. Sandstrom, 317 So.2d 732 (Fla.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1053, 96 S.Ct. 782, 46 L.Ed.2d 642 (1976); Hiles v. Auto Bahn Federation, Inc., 498 So.2d 997 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986).
SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.