Case Name: In the Matter of the State Commission Against Discrimination, Petitioner, v. Angelo Mustachio, Doing Business as Angelo's Barber Shop, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1961-05-16
Citations: 56 Misc. 2d 47
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the State Commission Against Discrimination, Petitioner, v. Angelo Mustachio, Doing Business as Angelo’s Barber Shop, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 56
Pages: 47–47

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the State Commission Against Discrimination, Petitioner, v. Angelo Mustachio, Doing Business as Angelo’s Barber Shop, Respondent.
Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau County,
May 16, 1961.
Henry Spitz for petitioner. F. Courts Bouse for respondent.

Opinion:
Bernard S. Meter, J.
Petition of the commission for an order of enforcement granted. There is substantial evidence in the record to support the findings and conclusions reached by the Hearing Commissioners. The claim that respondent sold his business and removed from the State after the hearing and before issuance of the Commissioner's order is irrelevant. The order speaks as of the time of the hearing and if supported by the record may be enforced. This court has jurisdiction even if respondent no longer resides or transacts business in Nassau County, since Nassau is the county in which the unlawful discriminatory practice occurred. The order, which applies to respondent at his shop in Uniondale 11 or any other barber shop operated by respondent within the State of New York ", should be enforced without modification.