Case Name: James HILL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-11-14
Citations: 31 S.W.3d 514
Docket Number: No. ED 77514
Parties: James HILL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., PAUL J. SIMON and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 31
Pages: 514–514

Head Matter:
James HILL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 77514.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Nov. 14, 2000.
Gwenda R. Robinson, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Gregory L. Barnes, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for Respondent.
Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., PAUL J. SIMON and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
James Hill appeals from a judgment denying without an evidentiary hearing his motion for post-conviction relief filed under Rule 24.035. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court's judgment is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo.R.Crim.P. 2000, unless otherwise indicated.