Case Name: Danny SCHAEFER, Employee/Appellant, v. BI-STATE DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, Employer/Cross-Appellant, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri, as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1996-12-17
Citations: 939 S.W.2d 446
Docket Number: Nos. 70580, 70453
Parties: Danny SCHAEFER, Employee/Appellant, v. BI-STATE DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, Employer/Cross-Appellant, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri, as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Respondent.
Judges: Before CRAHAN, P.J., and GRIMM and HOFF, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 939
Pages: 446–447

Head Matter:
Danny SCHAEFER, Employee/Appellant, v. BI-STATE DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, Employer/Cross-Appellant, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri, as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Respondent.
Nos. 70580, 70453.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Dec. 17, 1996.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Feb. 5, 1997.
Application to Transfer Denied March 25, 1997.
Charles A Mogab, St. Louis, for employee/appellant.
James A Thoenen, Jeffrey K. ElnicM, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before CRAHAN, P.J., and GRIMM and HOFF, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Employee and Employer each appeal the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. Employee appeals the denial of his claim for permanent total disability and his claim against the Second Injury Fund. Employer appeals the Commission's finding that Employee sustained a 55% permanent partial disability and its award of future medical care for pain management.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the Commission's award is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The award is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).