Case Name: Aubrey J. EL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Honorable Penney Pritzker, Secretary; Admiral David Score, Director, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Office of Marine Aviation Operations; Captain Anne Lynch, Commanding Officer National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Marine Operations-Atlantic, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-02-27
Citations: 678 F. App'x 99
Docket Number: No. 16-2071
Parties: Aubrey J. EL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Honorable Penney Pritzker, Secretary; Admiral David Score, Director, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Office of Marine Aviation Operations; Captain Anne Lynch, Commanding Officer National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Marine Operations-Atlantic, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 678
Pages: 99–100

Head Matter:
Aubrey J. EL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Honorable Penney Pritzker, Secretary; Admiral David Score, Director, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Office of Marine Aviation Operations; Captain Anne Lynch, Commanding Officer National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Marine Operations-Atlantic, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-2071
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: February 23, 2017
Decided: February 27, 2017
Aubrey J.-El, Appellant Pro Se.
Joel Eric Wilson, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Ap-pellees.
Before SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Aubrey J. El appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil action related to termination of his federal employment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. El v. U.S. Dep't of Commerce, No. 2:15-cv-00532-RGD-DEM (E.D. Va. July 19, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED