Case Name: Darryl W. LANE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Nora HUNT; Vickie Hardie; Gary Denobrega; Sharon Carthen, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-05-23
Citations: 182 F. App'x 187
Docket Number: No. 06-6167
Parties: Darryl W. LANE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Nora HUNT; Vickie Hardie; Gary Denobrega; Sharon Carthen, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 182
Pages: 187–187

Head Matter:
Darryl W. LANE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Nora HUNT; Vickie Hardie; Gary Denobrega; Sharon Carthen, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 06-6167.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 16, 2006.
Decided May 23, 2006.
Darryl W. Lane, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Darryl W. Lane appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Lane v. Hunt, No. 5:05-ct-00770-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 12, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED