Case Name: Henry McKinley SCOTT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patricia STANSBURY, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-04-27
Citations: 425 F. App'x 257
Docket Number: No. 11-6282
Parties: Henry McKinley SCOTT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patricia STANSBURY, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 425
Pages: 257–257

Head Matter:
Henry McKinley SCOTT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patricia STANSBURY, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 11-6282.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 21, 2011.
Decided: April 27, 2011.
Henry McKinley Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Anthony Exley, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Ap-pellee.
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Henry McKinley Scott, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2010) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Scott v. Stansbury, No. 2:10-cv-00061-HCM-FBS, 2011 WL 465264 (ED.Va. filed Feb. 3, 2011 & entered Feb. 4, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.