Case Name: Barbara J. GRASSO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shelly OTTENBRITE, Defendant-Appellant, and Michael Gunlicks, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-08-01
Citations: 140 F. App'x 473
Docket Number: No. 05-1214
Parties: Barbara J. GRASSO, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Shelly OTTENBRITE, Defendant—Appellant, and Michael Gunlicks, Defendant.
Judges: Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 140
Pages: 473–473

Head Matter:
Barbara J. GRASSO, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Shelly OTTENBRITE, Defendant—Appellant, and Michael Gunlicks, Defendant.
No. 05-1214.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 27, 2005.
Decided: Aug. 1, 2005.
Debra Desmore Corcoran, Jackson Law Group, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Barbara J. Grasso, Appellee Pro Se.
Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Shelly Ottenbrite seeks to appeal the district court's orders granting partial summary judgment in favor of Barbara J. Grasso in Grasso's breach of contract action and denying Ottenbrite's motion for reconsideration. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral, orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Ottenbrite seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED