Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles Lynch PATERSON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1986-01-03
Citations: 780 F.2d 883
Docket Number: No. 85-1247
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles Lynch PATERSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 780
Pages: 883–888

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles Lynch PATERSON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 85-1247.
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
Jan. 3, 1986.
H. Thomas Coghill and David J. Richman of Coghill & Goodspeed, P.C., Denver, Colo., for defendant-appellant.
William L. Lutz, U.S. Atty., and David N. Williams, Asst. U.S. Atty., Albuquerque, N.M., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before BARRETT, SETH and McKAY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
This matter is before the court on defendant-appellant's application for bail pending appeal.
We have carefully examined the record and the papers submitted by the parties and conclude that the application for bail pending appeal should be denied.