Case Name: Murray J. KLAUBER, Dr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SARASOTA, Sarasota Community Redevelopment Agency, David R. Sollenberger, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-11-18
Citations: 350 F.3d 1301
Docket Number: No. 02-16762
Parties: Murray J. KLAUBER, Dr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SARASOTA, Sarasota Community Redevelopment Agency, David R. Sollenberger, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before BLACK, HULL and COX, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 350
Pages: 1249–1250

Head Matter:
Murray J. KLAUBER, Dr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SARASOTA, Sarasota Community Redevelopment Agency, David R. Sollenberger, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 02-16762.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Nov. 18, 2003.
Donald Edward Hemke, Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith & Cutler P.A., Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Robert M. Fournier, Sarasota, FL, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before BLACK, HULL and COX, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
We find it unnecessary to decide whether the district court's analysis was correct in all respects. Based upon our de novo review of the record, we have determined there was no reversible error in the judgment entered for Appellees. Our determination is based upon several reasons including, but not limited to, Appellant's failure to demonstrate a genuine issue of material fact as to whether Appellees intentionally discriminated against him.
AFFIRMED.