Case Name: Felix A. Duffy, Appellant v. James H. Work, et al., as Executors, etc., Respondents
Court: New York Superior Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1891-07-02
Citations: 27 Jones & S. 592
Docket Number: 
Parties: Felix A. Duffy, Appellant v. James H. Work, et al., as Executors, etc., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Reports of cases argued and determined in the Superior Court of the city of New York
Volume: 59
Pages: 592–592

Head Matter:
Felix A. Duffy, Appellant v. James H. Work, et al., as Executors, etc., Respondents.
Decided July 2, 1891.
Appeal from a judgment dismissing the complaint entered upon the findings and decision of a judge at special term. The main question involved. was as to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the plaintiffs case.
Redfield & Redfield, for appellant.
A. L. Pincoffs, for respondents.
Before Freedman, Dugro and Gildersleeve, JJ..

Opinion:
The Court (Dugro, J., writing, Freedman and Gildersleeve, JJ., concurring) held the evidence insufficient and affirmed the judgment, with costs. •"