Case Name: Flora Hirsh, Appellant, v. Central Hanover Bank and Trust Company, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1937-05-07
Citations: 251 A.D. 24
Docket Number: 
Parties: Flora Hirsh, Appellant, v. Central Hanover Bank and Trust Company, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 251
Pages: 24–24

Head Matter:
Flora Hirsh, Appellant, v. Central Hanover Bank and Trust Company, Respondent.
First Department,
May 7, 1937.
Charles E. Scribner of counsel [Rabenold & Scribner, attorneys], for the appellant.
Albert Stickney of counsel [Francis S. Bensel and W. Frederick Knecht with him on the brief; Larkin, Rathbone & Perry, attorneys], for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The complaint states a sufficient cause of action at law though not in equity. Consequently, an answer having been interposed, the court should not have dismissed the complaint. (Clark v. Levy, 130 App. Div. 389; Perrin v. Smith, 135 id. 127; Kraemer v. World Wide Trading Co., Inc., 195 id. 305.)
The order should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied.
Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
Order unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.