Case Name: TROY HILLS VILLAGE, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BRUCE FISCHLER AND BETH FISCHLER, HIS WIFE, AND GEORGE F. KUGLER, JR., ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1973-01-29
Citations: 122 N.J. Super. 525
Docket Number: 
Parties: TROY HILLS VILLAGE, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BRUCE FISCHLER AND BETH FISCHLER, HIS WIFE, AND GEORGE F. KUGLER, JR., ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 122
Pages: 525–525

Head Matter:
TROY HILLS VILLAGE, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BRUCE FISCHLER AND BETH FISCHLER, HIS WIFE, AND GEORGE F. KUGLER, JR., ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued December 11, 1972
Decided January 29, 1973.
Before Judges Fritz, Lynch and Joelson.
Mr. Lester P. Dubow argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Ralph Labendz, on the brief; Messrs. Krug man, Chapnich, Grimshaw & Dubow, attorneys).
Mr. Ivan V. While, Jr. argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Mandón & While, attorneys).
Messrs. Michael D. Lang and Richard IS. Blumberg filed a brief amicus curiae on behalf of The New Jersey Tenants Organization.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The sole issue before us is the constitutionality of L. 1970, c. 210 (N. J. S. A. 2A:42-10.10 et seq.). The court below found the law constitutional and we agree, substantially for the reasons set forth in Judge Collins' written opinion, 122 N. J. Super. 572 (Law Div. 1971).
The matter reached us prematurely, a counterclaim not yet having been decided. We were advised at oral argument that defendant-tenants have moved; the counterclaim may be moot. In any event, we remand for disposition of the counterclaim.
Judgment denying plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and dismissing complaint is affirmed. Counterclaim is remanded for disposition. We do not retain jurisdiction.