Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dennis MIMMS, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dennis Mimms, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-01-09
Citations: 22 F. App'x 342
Docket Number: Nos. 01-7453, 01-7524
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dennis MIMMS, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dennis Mimms, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 22
Pages: 342–343

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dennis MIMMS, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dennis Mimms, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 01-7453, 01-7524.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 20, 2001.
Decided Jan. 9, 2002.
Dennis Mimms, Jr., Pro Se. Rebecca A. Betts, United States Attorney, Michael Lee Keller, Office of the United States Attorney, Charleston, WV, for Appellee.
Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Dennis Mimms, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001) (No. 01-7453). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Mimms further seeks to appeal the district court's denial as moot his motion to dismiss his criminal conviction for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (No. 01-7524). We find no reversible error upon our review of the record and the district court's opinion. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeals on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Mimms, Nos. CR-97-85; CA-00-1168-6 (S.D.W. Va. July 12 & Aug. 1, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.