Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio Delrea SMITH, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-09-14
Citations: 478 F. App'x 37
Docket Number: No. 12-7163
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio Delrea SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 478
Pages: 37–38

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio Delrea SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-7163.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 11, 2012.
Decided: Sept. 14, 2012.
Antonio Delrea Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Keith Michael Cave, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Antonio Delrea Smith appeals the district court's orders denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Smith's § 3582(c)(2) motion for the rea sons stated by the district court. United States v. Smith, No. 3:05-cr-00013-RJC-DCK-1 (W.D.N.C. May 24, 2012). We also affirm the denial of Smith's motion to reconsider, noting that the district court lacked authority to even consider the motion. See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir.2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.