Case Name: William H. WALLS, Respondent, v. Lucinda VANCIL, Appellant, and Charles Vancil, Defendant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-11-23
Citations: 7 S.W.3d 555
Docket Number: No. ED 75905
Parties: William H. WALLS, Respondent, v. Lucinda VANCIL, Appellant, and Charles Vancil, Defendant.
Judges: Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 7
Pages: 555–555

Head Matter:
William H. WALLS, Respondent, v. Lucinda VANCIL, Appellant, and Charles Vancil, Defendant.
No. ED 75905.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Nov. 23, 1999.
James G. Nowogrocki, St. Louis, for appellant.
Matthew A. Sehroeder, Union, for respondent.
Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Lucinda Vancil appeals the trial court's judgment that William Walls is entitled to an equitable lien on real estate purchased with money advanced by him and his now-deceased wife. We find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value.
We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(1).