Case Name: Willie ZIMMERMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-03-15
Citations: 714 F. App'x 300
Docket Number: No. 17-2332
Parties: Willie ZIMMERMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 714
Pages: 300–301

Head Matter:
Willie ZIMMERMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 17-2332
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 13, 2018
Decided: March 15, 2018
Willie Zimmerman, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Allen Fitzgerald, MCGUIRE-WOODS, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Willie Zimmerman seeks to appeal the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, denying his motion to amend his complaint for a second time, granting Bank of America's motion to dismiss, and dismissing his complaint. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.
Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court's final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). "[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement." Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007).
The district court's order was entered on the docket on October 17, 2017. The notice of appeal was filed on November 17, 2017. Because Zimmerman failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED