Case Name: Amy Zambrana, Appellant, v. City of New York et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2000-02-17
Citations: 94 N.Y.2d 887
Docket Number: 
Parties: Amy Zambrana, Appellant, v City of New York et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 94
Pages: 887–888

Head Matter:
[727 NE2d 573, 706 NYS2d 76]
Amy Zambrana, Appellant, v City of New York et al., Respondents.
Argued January 5, 2000;
decided February 17, 2000
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Proner & Proner, New York City (Tobi R. Salottolo of counsel), for appellant.
McCabe, Collins, McGeough & Fowler, Mineola (Patrick M. Murphy of counsel), for respondents.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
We agree with the majority memorandum of the Appellate Division. We further note that plaintiff failed to identify any triable issue of fact with respect to whether defendant had notice of the reckless conduct of other skaters in order to defeat defendant's motion for summary judgment (Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562).
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt concur.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.