Case Name: Matthew CONKLIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ENGLEHARD CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-02-27
Citations: 169 F. App'x 545
Docket Number: No. 05-16383; D.C. Docket No. 04-00208-CV-4
Parties: Matthew CONKLIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ENGLEHARD CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before TJOFLAT, BARKETT and HILL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 169
Pages: 545–545

Head Matter:
Matthew CONKLIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ENGLEHARD CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 05-16383
D.C. Docket No. 04-00208-CV-4.
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Feb. 27, 2006.
Fred S. Clark, Clark & Clark, Savannah, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
R. Lee Creasman, Jr., Stanford G. Wilson, Elarbee, Thompson, Sapp & Wilson, LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before TJOFLAT, BARKETT and HILL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
We have carefully reviewed the briefs, record and order of the district court. Finding no reversible error in the Order of the Honorable Avant Edenfield dated and filed September 19, 2005, the judgment of the said court granting summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee is
AFFIRMED.