Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William JOHNSTON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-08-27
Citations: 341 F. App'x 897
Docket Number: No. 09-7010
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. William JOHNSTON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 341
Pages: 897–897

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. William JOHNSTON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-7010.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 20, 2009.
Decided: Aug. 27, 2009.
William Johnston, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
William Johnston appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Johnston, No. 3:00-cr-00135-GCM-1 (W.D.N.C. May 21, 2009). See United States v. Hood, 556 F.3d 226 (4th Cir. 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.