Case Name: ARTHUR E. BERRY, GUARDIAN, &c., PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. ANNA M. POTTER, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1894-06
Citations: 57 N.J.L. 201
Docket Number: 
Parties: ARTHUR E. BERRY, GUARDIAN, &c., PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. ANNA M. POTTER, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 57
Pages: 201–202

Head Matter:
ARTHUR E. BERRY, GUARDIAN, &c., PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. ANNA M. POTTER, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
On error to the Supreme Court. For opinion of Supreme Court, see 27 Vroom 454.
For the plaintiff in error, Ephraim Cutter.
For the defendant in error, Alan H. Strong.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment in this case is affirmed, for the reasons given by the court below.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Abbett, Depue, Garrison, Lippincott, Reed, Van Sycicel, Brown, Sims, Smith. 11.
For reversal — None.