Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Garth Leslie SCHIMMELE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-06-13
Citations: 36 F. App'x 623
Docket Number: No. 01-50545; D.C. No. CR-01-00827-TJW
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Garth Leslie SCHIMMELE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 36
Pages: 623–623

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Garth Leslie SCHIMMELE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 01-50545.
D.C. No. CR-01-00827-TJW.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 10, 2002.
Decided June 13, 2002.
Before RYMER, T.G. NELSON, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Garth Leslie Schimmele appeals his conviction and 77-month prison sentence imposed following his guilty plea to importation of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 952 and 960. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Schimmele contends that the district court erred by denying his motion to dismiss the indictment because 21 U.S.C. § 952 and 960 are unconstitutional pursuant to Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Our holdings in United States v. Mendoza-Paz, 286 F.3d 1104, 1110 (9th Cir.2002) (§ 960), and United States v. Varela-Rivera, 279 F.3d 1174, 1175 n. 1 (9th Cir.2002) (§ 952) foreclose this argument.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.