Case Name: Johnny HARRISON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2003-02-14
Citations: 837 So. 2d 598
Docket Number: No. 2D02-3646
Parties: Johnny HARRISON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: WHATLEY and CASANUEVA, JJ„ Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 837
Pages: 598–599

Head Matter:
Johnny HARRISON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D02-3646.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Feb. 14, 2003.

Opinion:
NORTHCUTT, Judge.
Johnny Harrison challenges the trial court's order summarily denying his mo tion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm.
In his motion, Harrison alleged that his plea was involuntary because defense counsel affirmatively misadvised him regarding the future sentence enhancing effects of the plea in regard to an as yet uncommitted crime. In Stansel v. State, 825 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), we held that this claim is not cognizable in a rule 3.850 motion. We certify the same question that we certified in Stansel.
Affirmed.
WHATLEY and CASANUEVA, JJ" Concur.