Case Name: Patricia W. FROMAL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BUSCH ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-10-16
Citations: 48 F. App'x 71
Docket Number: No. 02-1490
Parties: Patricia W. FROMAL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BUSCH ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 48
Pages: 71–71

Head Matter:
Patricia W. FROMAL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BUSCH ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 02-1490.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 10, 2002.
Decided Oct. 16, 2002.
Patricia W. Fromal, Appellant Pro Se. William Franklin Devine, Lisa Ann Bertini, Amberley Gibbs Jochens, Hofheimer & Nusbaum, P.C., Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Patricia Watkins Fromal appeals from the dismissal of her personal injury claim following a jury verdict for Busch Entertainment Corporation. Fromal claimed that she was injured while disembarking from an amusement park ride at Busch Gardens.
Fromal does not suggest that the verdict of the jury was contrary to the evidence or the controlling law. Rather, she limits her appellate claims to numerous procedural issues alleging violations of due process. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See generally United States v. Weaver, 282 F.3d 302, 314 (2002) (holding that claims of procedural due process are reviewed for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.