Case Name: THOMPSON VS. DUFUY ET ALS.
Court: Louisiana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1832-03
Citations: 3 La. 432
Docket Number: 
Parties: THOMPSON VS. DUFUY ET ALS.
Judges: 
Reporter: Louisiana Reports
Volume: 3
Pages: 432–433

Head Matter:
THOMPSON VS. DUFUY ET ALS.
Eastern Dist.
March, 1832.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OP THE FOURTH DISTRICT, THE JUDGE OF THIC SECOND PRESIDING.^
By tlie old Civil Code, the vendee could not resist payment of the price, unless he was disturbed by a suit.
If a suit by which the vendeg is disturbed, be dismissed, he cannot resist the vendors claim for payment of the price.
A suit which is terminated is, as if it had never been instituted.

Opinion:
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court, delivered by
Porter, J.
The plaintiff sought for, and obtained an injunction, to prevent his vendor enforcing payment of the price of a tract of land. The grounds, alleged for this relief, were, that the title was dubious and defective, and that the petitioner was disturbed by a suit, in which certain persons claimed part of the premises.
The court on hearing the parties, dissolved the injunction, and the plaintiff appealed.
The suit which was referred to in the petition, was dismissed, or rather there was judgment in it of non-suit, previous to the hearing in this cause. The record of it has, however, been referred to, to show that the plaintiff is yet in danger of eviction-
The contract, on which this litigation has arisen, was 7 .- /-»/%/> , , . . " _ , entered into, m the year 1822, while the provisions of the old Civil Code were in force, and by the rules there established, this case must be governed. 7 N. S., 236. 6 ibid., 385.
According to its provisions, the vendee could not resist payment of the price, unless he was disturbed by a suit. In the case of Gardere vs. Foucher et als., we held, that where the suit, by which the buyer had been disturbed, was dismissed previous to the trial of the case in injunction, that it did not authorise him to resist the vendors claim for payment. A suit which has terminated, is, as if it never had been instituted. The disturbance produced by it, ends with the pendency of the action. 4 N. S. 354. 3 ibid., 111.
It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment of the District Court be affirmed, with costs.