Case Name: Rodrigo QUINTANA, Appellant, v. Maria DE LA LUZ QUINTANA, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1983-04-27
Citations: 432 So. 2d 579
Docket Number: No. AO-241
Parties: Rodrigo QUINTANA, Appellant, v. Maria DE LA LUZ QUINTANA, Appellee.
Judges: ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., C.J., and SHIVERS and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 432
Pages: 579–579

Head Matter:
Rodrigo QUINTANA, Appellant, v. Maria DE LA LUZ QUINTANA, Appellee.
No. AO-241.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
April 27, 1983.
Kenneth E. Brooten, Jr., of Kenneth E. Brooten, Jr., Chartered, Gainesville, for appellant.
Zelda J. Hawk, of Sieg, Comfort, Hawk, La Croix & Reid, Gainesville, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The provision in the circuit court's judgment that "In the event of the death of the Husband, alimony payments shall not terminate but shall be a charge against the husband's estate" is erroneous and is by this judgment excised. O'Malley v. Pan American Bank of Orlando, N.A., 384 So.2d 1258 (Fla.1980). As modified the judgment of the circuit court is AFFIRMED.
ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., C.J., and SHIVERS and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.