Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Noe AISPURO-VIDANA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-10-02
Citations: 249 F. App'x 674
Docket Number: No. 06-10761
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Noe AISPURO-VIDANA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 249
Pages: 674–675

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Noe AISPURO-VIDANA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-10761.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 24, 2007.
Filed Oct. 2, 2007.
James R. Knapp, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee.
Anders V. Rosenquist, Jr., Esq., Rosen-quist & Associates, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: CANBY, TASHIMA and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Noe Aispuro-Vidana appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 37-month sentence for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Ais-puro-Vidana's counsel has filed a brief stating that he finds no meritorious issues for review, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Because the record indicates that Aispu-ro-Vidana knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence, we enforce the waiver and dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir. 2000).
Accordingly, we GRANT counsel's motion to withdraw.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.