Case Name: City of Hartford v. Stanley V. Tucker et al.
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1985-12-24
Citations: 5 Conn. App. 633
Docket Number: 3285
Parties: City of Hartford v. Stanley V. Tucker et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Appellate Reports
Volume: 5
Pages: 633–634

Head Matter:
City of Hartford v. Stanley V. Tucker et al.
(3285)
Hull, Daly and Bieluch, Js.
Argued November 11
decision released December 24, 1985
Stanley V. Tucker, pro se, the appellant (named defendant).
Frederick D. Augenstern, for the appellees (third party defendants Frances Gionfriddo et al.).
Michael G. Durham, for the appellee (third party defendant Western Surety Co.).
James F. Kane, for the appellees (third party defendants Frank Smith et al.).
Larry P. Levesque, for the appellee (plaintiff).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The named defendant has appealed the dismissal of his third party complaints against the receivers of rents and their respective sureties as a result of the defendant's failure to obtain the requisite prior permission of the court.
We carefully reviewed the named defendant's claims in these matters and find them to be without merit. See Tucker v. American Ins. Co., 3 Conn. App. 397, 399, 488 A.2d 1278 (1985).
There is no error.
There are four cases involved in this appeal which present the same issues: Hartford Superior Court docket numbers 287787, 287788, 287789 and 287790.