Case Name: Otto PASTOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNION CENTRAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-05-02
Citations: 128 F. App'x 100
Docket Number: No. 04-12280; D.C. Docket No. 01-03993-CV-ASG
Parties: Otto PASTOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNION CENTRAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 128
Pages: 100–100

Head Matter:
Otto PASTOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNION CENTRAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 04-12280.
D.C. Docket No. 01-03993-CV-ASG.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
May 2, 2005.
Brenton Ver Ploeg, Brenton N. Ver Ploeg, P.A., and Stephen A. Marino, Jr., Ver Ploeg & Lumpkin, P.A., Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Jerel C. Dawson, Stephen Trivett Maher, Shutts & Bowen LLP, Keith D. Post, and William J. Gallwey, III, Gallwey, Gill-man, et al., Miami, FL, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before BLACK, MARCUS and FAY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See llth Cir. R. 36-1.
. llth Cir. R. 36-1 provides:
When the court determines that any of the following circumstances exist:
(a) judgment of the district court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous;
(b) the evidence in support of a jury verdict is sufficient;
(c) the order of an administrative agency is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole;
(d) summary judgment, directed verdict, or judgment on the pleadings is supported by the record;
(e) judgment has been entered without a reversible error of law; and an opinion would have no precedential value;
the judgment or order may be affirmed or enforced without opinion.