Case Name: Orrin M. HAUGEN, et al., Appellants, Richard M. Smith, Plaintiff, v. Muriel PETERSON, Respondent
Court: Minnesota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Minnesota
Decision Date: 1986-09-25
Citations: 393 N.W.2d 372
Docket Number: No. C8-85-2212
Parties: Orrin M. HAUGEN, et al., Appellants, Richard M. Smith, Plaintiff, v. Muriel PETERSON, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: North Western Reporter 2d
Volume: 393
Pages: 372–372

Head Matter:
Orrin M. HAUGEN, et al., Appellants, Richard M. Smith, Plaintiff, v. Muriel PETERSON, Respondent.
No. C8-85-2212.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
Sept. 25, 1986.

Opinion:
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon the motion of Muriel Peterson for reconsideration of a denial of the original petition for further review, the petition for further review be, and the same is, granted. The petitioner shall proceed as the appellant and briefs shall be filed in the quantity, form and within the time limitations contained in Minn.R.Civ.App.P. 131 and 132. Counsel will be notified at a later date of the time for argument before this court. No requests for extensions of time for the filing of briefs will be entertained.