Case Name: Stephen A. HALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2013-11-27
Citations: 127 So. 3d 824
Docket Number: No. 2D13-1921
Parties: Stephen A. HALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SILBERMAN, CRENSHAW, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 127
Pages: 824–825

Head Matter:
Stephen A. HALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D13-1921.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Nov. 27, 2013.
Stephen A. Hall, pro se.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The postconviction court's partial denial of Stephen A. Hall's motion filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) is affirmed without prejudice for Hall to file a motion under rule 3.801. If Hall chooses to filé a rule 3.801 motion, it must comply with the requirements out lined in rules 3.801(b), (c), (e), and 3.850(n). Upon receipt of a rule 3.801 motion, the court must follow the procedure outlined in rule 3.850(f). See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.801(e) (effective July 1, 2013). Because it appears that Hall's time to file a rule 3.801 motion will have expired during the pen-dency of this appeal, if he files such a motion within thirty days of the date this opinion becomes final, it shall not be considered untimely.
Affirmed without prejudice.
SILBERMAN, CRENSHAW, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.