Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. David Chung, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2007-04-03
Citations: 39 A.D.3d 558
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Chung, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 39
Pages: 558–558

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Chung, Appellant.
[831 NYS2d 723]

Opinion:
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D'Ernie, J.), rendered May 6, 2005, convicting him of assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to support his conviction is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 19 [1995]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), the jury could have found that the evidence established the elements of assault in the second degree. Contrary to the defendant's contention, the trial court properly admitted testimony about inculpating statements made by the deceased victim during her struggle with the defendant as excited utterances (see People v Edwards, 47 NY2d 493, 496 [1979]; People v Brown, 70 NY2d 513 [1987]).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80, 85 [1982]).
The defendant's remaining contention is without merit (see People v Smith, 278 AD2d 154 [2000]). Prudenti, PJ., Fisher, Garni and McCarthy, JJ., concur.