Case Name: IN RE: Adina ZAHARESCU, Debtor. Satish Shetty, Appellant, v. Ocwen Financial Services, Inc.; et al., Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-08-24
Citations: 696 F. App'x 824
Docket Number: No. 14-55401
Parties: IN RE: Adina ZAHARESCU, Debtor. Satish Shetty, Appellant, v. Ocwen Financial Services, Inc.; et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before: SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Bankruptcy Reporter
Volume: 575
Pages: 824–825

Head Matter:
IN RE: Adina ZAHARESCU, Debtor. Satish Shetty, Appellant, v. Ocwen Financial Services, Inc.; et al., Appellees.
No. 14-55401
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted August 9, 2017
Filed August 24, 2017
Satish Shetty, Pro Se
Eric D. Houser, Attorney, Robert W. Norman, Jr., Attorney, Houser & Allison, APC, Irvine, CA, for Appellees Ocwen Financial Services, Inc., Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, Litton Loan Servicing, LP
Eric D. Houser, Attorney, Robert W. Norman, Jr., Attorney, Houser & Allison, APC, Irvine, CA, Kevin Broersma, Attor ney, Los Angeles, CA, for Appellee Deutsche Bank National Trust Company-
Before: SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Satish Shetty appeals pro se from the district court's order affirming the bankruptcy court's order dismissing claims against appellees in Shett/s adversary proceeding. We review de novo our own jurisdiction and whether a bankruptcy .court's decision is final. Silver Sage Partners, Ltd. v. City of Desert Hot Springs (In re City of Desert Hot Springs), 339 F.3d 782, 787 (9th Cir. 2003). We dismiss.
This court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because "the bankruptcy court's order did not dispose' of all of the issues in the adversary proceeding" or "direct entry of judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b) which applies to adversary proceedings in bankruptcy by virtue of Bankruptcy Rule 7054." Walther v. King City Transit Mix, Inc. (In re King City Transit Mix, Inc.), 738 F.2d 1065, 1066-67 (9th Cir. 1984) (appellate jurisdiction in bankruptcy extends only to matters appealable to the district court as of right).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.