Case Name: Charles RUTHERFORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-01-20
Citations: 537 So. 2d 200
Docket Number: No. 87-1905
Parties: Charles RUTHERFORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: RYDER, A.C.J., and FRANK and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 537
Pages: 200–201

Head Matter:
Charles RUTHERFORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 87-1905.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Jan. 20, 1989.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Jennifer Y. Fogle, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Stephen A. Baker, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in imposing court costs without notice or the opportunity to be heard. Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984). Accordingly, we strike the cost provision without prejudice to the state to seek reassessment after proper notice to appellant. The judgment and sentence are affirmed in all other respects.
RYDER, A.C.J., and FRANK and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.