Case Name: Perry L. CRAWFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James M. TURPIN; Susan McNeely; Mary Steins, Defendants-Appellees, and North Carolina Department Of Corrections; The Utilization Review Board, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-05-20
Citations: 96 F. App'x 921
Docket Number: No. 04-6564
Parties: Perry L. CRAWFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James M. TURPIN; Susan McNeely; Mary Steins, Defendants—Appellees, and North Carolina Department Of Corrections; The Utilization Review Board, Defendants.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 96
Pages: 921–922

Head Matter:
Perry L. CRAWFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James M. TURPIN; Susan McNeely; Mary Steins, Defendants—Appellees, and North Carolina Department Of Corrections; The Utilization Review Board, Defendants.
No. 04-6564.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 13, 2004.
Decided: May 20, 2004.
Perry L. Crawford, Appellant pro se.
Dana Hefter Davis, Raleigh, North Carolina; Roy Asberry Cooper III, Marry S. Mercer, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Perry L. Crawford appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Crawford v. Turpin, No. CA-01-40-1 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 26, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED