Case Name: David BRADFORD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. M.L. RIVERA, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-04-03
Citations: 471 F. App'x 109
Docket Number: No. 11-7607
Parties: David BRADFORD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. M.L. RIVERA, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 471
Pages: 109–110

Head Matter:
David BRADFORD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. M.L. RIVERA, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 11-7607.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 29, 2012.
Decided: April 3, 2012.
David Bradford, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
David Bradford, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2011) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bradford v. Rivera, No. 9:11-cv-00462-RBH, 2011 WL 5827601 (D.S.C. Nov. 18, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.