Case Name: Shirley SCHULTZ, Appellant, v. ZIERCHER & HOCKER, P.C. and Jeffrey D. Sigmund, Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-02-24
Citations: 131 S.W.3d 369
Docket Number: No. ED 82947
Parties: Shirley SCHULTZ, Appellant, v. ZIERCHER & HOCKER, P.C. and Jeffrey D. Sigmund, Respondents.
Judges: Before BOOKER T. SHAW, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 131
Pages: 369–370

Head Matter:
Shirley SCHULTZ, Appellant, v. ZIERCHER & HOCKER, P.C. and Jeffrey D. Sigmund, Respondents.
No. ED 82947.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Feb. 24, 2004.
Rehearing Denied April 1, 2004.
Kenneth A. Leeds, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Steven H. Schwartz, Benjamin Boren-gasser, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before BOOKER T. SHAW, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Shirley Schultz appeals the summary judgment entered on her claim against Ziercher & Hocker, P.C. and Jeffrey D. Sigmund on her claim for legal malpractice. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would be of no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).