Case Name: STATE OF OREGON v. WINONA MAE FOSTER
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1966-09-09
Citations: 245 Or. 501
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF OREGON v. WINONA MAE FOSTER
Judges: Before McAllister, Chief Justice, and O’Connell, Goodwin, Lusk and Hammond, Justices.
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 245
Pages: 501–502

Head Matter:
Argued July 8,
affirmed September 9, 1966,
United States Supreme Court denied certiorari January 27, 1967
STATE OF OREGON v. WINONA MAE FOSTER
417 P. 2d 1023
James E. Ritter, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Harland, Winslow & Ritter, Salem.
Gary D. Gortmaker, District Attorney, Salem, argued the cause and submitted a brief for respondent.
Before McAllister, Chief Justice, and O’Connell, Goodwin, Lusk and Hammond, Justices.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for the crime of aiding a committed person to escape from the Oregon State Hospital.
Defendant contends that the trial court erred in allowing the testimony of police officers as to oral admissions made by her at a time when she was not represented by counsel, not advised of her right to counsel, and not advised of her right to remain silent. The record shows that defendant was advised of these constitutional rights by the police officer who first interrogated her.
The trial court specifically found that defendant's constitutional rights were explained to her.
The judgment is affirmed.