Case Name: JOHN ROBERTSON, MAYOR OF WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP MUNICIPAL UTILITIES AUTHORITY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND THE WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP MUNICIPAL UTILITIES AUTHORITY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JOHN ROBERTSON, MAYOR OF WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1987-02-19
Citations: 215 N.J. Super. 239
Docket Number: 
Parties: JOHN ROBERTSON, MAYOR OF WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP MUNICIPAL UTILITIES AUTHORITY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND THE WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP MUNICIPAL UTILITIES AUTHORITY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JOHN ROBERTSON, MAYOR OF WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 215
Pages: 239–240

Head Matter:
JOHN ROBERTSON, MAYOR OF WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP MUNICIPAL UTILITIES AUTHORITY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND THE WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP MUNICIPAL UTILITIES AUTHORITY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JOHN ROBERTSON, MAYOR OF WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Submitted January 14, 1987
Decided February 19, 1987.
Before Judges FURMAN, DREIER and SHEBELL.
Alacqua & Wiltsee, attorneys for appellant (Joseph A. Alacqua on the brief).
Rafferty & Costa, attorneys for respondent (James E. Rafferty on the brief).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm substantially for the reasons stated by Judge Edward S. Miller in his opinion reported at 211 N.J.Super. 504 (Law Div.1986).