Case Name: In the MATTER OF: Robert W. HUNT, M.D., DBA Intercommunity Medical Group, Debtor. Peli Popovich Hunt, Appellant, v. Peter C. Anderson, United States Trustee; David M. Goodrich, Chapter 7 Trustee, Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-07-05
Citations: 693 F. App'x 586
Docket Number: No. 16-55646
Parties: In the MATTER OF: Robert W. HUNT, M.D., DBA Intercommunity Medical Group, Debtor. Peli Popovich Hunt, Appellant, v. Peter C. Anderson, United States Trustee; David M. Goodrich, Chapter 7 Trustee, Appellees.
Judges: Before: PAEZ, BEA and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Bankruptcy Reporter
Volume: 574
Pages: 586–587

Head Matter:
In the MATTER OF: Robert W. HUNT, M.D., DBA Intercommunity Medical Group, Debtor. Peli Popovich Hunt, Appellant, v. Peter C. Anderson, United States Trustee; David M. Goodrich, Chapter 7 Trustee, Appellees.
No. 16-55646
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 26, 2017
Filed July 5, 2017
Peli Popovich Hunt, Pro Se
Dare Law, Trial Attorney, Hatty Yip, Office of the U.S. Trustee, Los Angeles, CA, for Appellee Peter C. Anderson
David Gould, Esquire, Gould & Gould LLP, Calabasas, CA, for Appellee David M. Goodrich
Before: PAEZ, BEA and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Peli Popovich Hunt appeals pro se from the district court's order dismissing Hunt's bankruptcy appeal. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d) and 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion a dismissal for failure to comply with a court's pre-filing order entered against a vexatious litigant. In re Fillbach, 223 F.3d 1089, 1090-91 (9th Cir. 2000). We affirm.
In her opening brief, Hunt fails to address how the district court erred by dismissing her bankruptcy appeal for filing the appeal in violation of the district court's pre-filing order. As a result, Hunt has waived her challenge to the district court's order. See Smith v. Marsh, 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999) ("[O]n appeal, arguments not raised by a party in its opening brief are deemed waived."); Greenwood v. FAA, 28 F.3d 971, 977 (9th Cir. 1994) ("We review only issues which are argued specifically and distinctly in a party's opening brief.").
Because we affirm the district court's order dismissing Hunt's bankruptcy appeal, we do not consider her arguments challenging bankruptcy court orders.
All pending motions are denied.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.