Case Name: William A. Fabian, Jr., an Infant, by Wilhelmina Fabian, His Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Schenectady Rapid Transit, Inc., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1935-06
Citations: 245 A.D. 791
Docket Number: 
Parties: William A. Fabian, Jr., an Infant, by Wilhelmina Fabian, His Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Schenectady Rapid Transit, Inc., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 245
Pages: 791–791

Head Matter:
William A. Fabian, Jr., an Infant, by Wilhelmina Fabian, His Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Schenectady Rapid Transit, Inc., Appellant.

Opinion:
Appeal by defendant from an order denying its motion for a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence. There is nothing in the newly-discovered evidence which would justify the conclusion that it would change the result if a new trial were granted. The same judge who presided at the trial heard the motion for a new trial and denied the application. The order appealed from is discretionary and should be affirmed. Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Hill, P. J., McNamee, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.