Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Nahun Huberto ALMENDAREZ-VILLAFRANCA, also known as Nahun Almendarez, also known as Nahun Huberto Almendarez Villafranca, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-07-17
Citations: 693 F. App'x 356
Docket Number: No. 16-20612 Summary Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Nahun Huberto ALMENDAREZ-VILLAFRANCA, also known as Nahun Almendarez, also known as Nahun Huberto Almendarez Villafranca, Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 693
Pages: 356–357

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Nahun Huberto ALMENDAREZ-VILLAFRANCA, also known as Nahun Almendarez, also known as Nahun Huberto Almendarez Villafranca, Defendant-Appellant
No. 16-20612 Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed July 17, 2017
Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Nahun Huberto. Almendarez-Villafranca, Pro Se
Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Nahun Huberto Almendarez-Villafranca has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Almendarez-Villafranca has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused- from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cib. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.