Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Lee RIES, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-09-17
Citations: 47 F. App'x 822
Docket Number: No. 01-10057, 01-10212; D.C. No. CR.-F-95-5174 OWW
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Lee RIES, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before PREGERSON, ALARCON, and WARD LAW, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 47
Pages: 822–822

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Lee RIES, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 01-10057, 01-10212.
D.C. No. CR.-F-95-5174 OWW.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 11, 2002 .
Decided Sept. 17, 2002.
Before PREGERSON, ALARCON, and WARD LAW, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
David L. Ries appeals the district court's order of December 13, 2000. We dismiss the appeals for lack of jurisdiction, because the order was neither a final order appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 nor an interlocutory order appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1292. See Ballard v. Baldridge, 209 F.3d 1160, 1160 (9th Cir.2000); WMX Technologies, Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir.1997) (en banc).
DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.