Case Name: William K. BROWNFIELD, Respondent, v. Ralph and Lorene BROWNFIELD, Appellants, Eugene and Larry Soles, Respondents; William K. BROWNFIELD, Appellant, v. Ralph and Lorene BROWNFIELD, Respondents, Eugene and Larry Soles, Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1996-03-26
Citations: 918 S.W.2d 349
Docket Number: Nos. WD 50748, WD 50787
Parties: William K. BROWNFIELD, Respondent, v. Ralph and Lorene BROWNFIELD, Appellants, Eugene and Larry Soles, Respondents. William K. BROWNFIELD, Appellant, v. Ralph and Lorene BROWNFIELD, Respondents, Eugene and Larry Soles, Respondents.
Judges: Before FENNER, C.J., P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and BRECKENRIDGE, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 918
Pages: 349–349

Head Matter:
William K. BROWNFIELD, Respondent, v. Ralph and Lorene BROWNFIELD, Appellants, Eugene and Larry Soles, Respondents. William K. BROWNFIELD, Appellant, v. Ralph and Lorene BROWNFIELD, Respondents, Eugene and Larry Soles, Respondents.
Nos. WD 50748, WD 50787.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
March 26, 1996.
Andrew C. Webb, Sedalia, for appellant/respondent.
Gary William Smith, Sedalia, for respondents/appellants.
Julius F. Wall, Clinton, for respondents.
Before FENNER, C.J., P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and BRECKENRIDGE, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appeal from judgment of trial court denying claim for conversion against respondent and cross-appellant, Ralph David Brownfield. Cross-appellants Ralph David Brownfield and Lorene Brownfield appeal judgment of the trial court finding that William Brownfield had a contractual right to continued use of well water from the property of Ralph David and Lorene Brownfield.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).