Case Name: The J. L. Hudson Company v. United States
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1961-04-18
Citations: 46 Cust. Ct. 661
Docket Number: Reap. Dec. 9977; Entry No. 203
Parties: The J. L. Hudson Company v. United States
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Volume: 46
Pages: 661–662

Head Matter:
(Reap. Dec. 9977)
The J. L. Hudson Company v. United States
Entry No. 203.
(Decided April 18, 1961)
Tompkins & Tompkins for the plaintiff.
William H. Orrielc, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Opinion:
OliveR, Chief Judge:
Counsel for the respective parties have submitted this appeal for reappraisement on a written stipulation, reading as follows:
It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between counsel for the Plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, Defendant, that the merchandise on the invoice accompanying the entry covered by the above-named appeal, consists of articles from Czechoslovakia which were appraised on the basis of export value, Section 402(d) Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, including a 15% commission paid by the American importers to the foreign commissionaires for services rendered in connection with the purchase of the merchandise in the foreign market, which commissions did not inure to the benefit of the sellers, and that the issues are the same in all material respects as those that were involved in the case of Paramount Import do., Inc. et al v. United States, Reap. Dec. 9697, wherein it was held that said 15% commission should not be included as a part of the dutiable values.
It is further agreed that the values found by the appraiser with the 15% commission deducted are not higher than the foreign values as defined in Section 402(c) of the same Act.
It is further stipulated and agreed that the record in the case of Paramount Import Co., Inc. et al v. United States, Reap. Dec. 9697, be incorporated in the record in this case, and that the appeal be submitted on this stipulation.
On the agreed facts and following my cited decision on the law, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question is export value, as defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff A.ct of 1930, and hold that such statutory value therefor is the appraised values, less the item identified on the invoice as "15% Buying-commission." Judgment will be rendered accordingly.