Case Name: In the Matter of Harold Konigsberg, Petitioner, v. Louis B. Scheinman, as Acting County Judge of Ulster County, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1982-03-12
Citations: 87 A.D.2d 703
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Harold Konigsberg, Petitioner, v Louis B. Scheinman, as Acting County Judge of Ulster County, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 87
Pages: 703–703

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Harold Konigsberg, Petitioner, v Louis B. Scheinman, as Acting County Judge of Ulster County, Respondent.

Opinion:
Motion by respondent to dismiss petition on objections in point of law granted, and petition dated January 9, 1982 dismissed. The extraordinary remedy of prohibition does not lie to review matters such as the alleged bias or prejudice of a Trial Judge where such matters can be raised on direct appeal from the judgment of conviction (Matter of Lucas v Scheinman, 83 AD2d 969). Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Yesawich, Jr., Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.