Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Stuart Lee HOOD, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1997-03-11
Citations: 941 S.W.2d 744
Docket Number: No. 70167
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Stuart Lee HOOD, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before DOWD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRANE, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 941
Pages: 744–744

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Stuart Lee HOOD, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 70167.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
March 11, 1997.
Ellen H. Flottman, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for defendant-appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Da-ryle A. Edwards, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff-respondent.
Before DOWD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRANE, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals from the judgment on his conviction by a jury of robbery in the first degree, § 569.020, RSMo 1994, for which he was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to life imprisonment. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).