Case Name: R.A. FEUER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MERCK & CO., INC., Defendant-Respondent.
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 2019-05-15
Citations: 207 A.3d 264
Docket Number: A-34 September Term 2018; 081409
Parties: R.A. FEUER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MERCK & CO., INC., Defendant-Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 207
Pages: 264–264

Head Matter:
R.A. FEUER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MERCK & CO., INC., Defendant-Respondent.
A-34 September Term 2018
081409
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued April 24, 2019
Decided May 15, 2019
Lisa J. Rodriguez argued the cause for appellant (Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis, attorneys; Lisa J. Rodriguez, on the brief).
J. Gordon Cooney, Jr., of the Pennsylvania bar, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for respondent (Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, attorneys; J. Gordon Cooney, Jr., John McGahren, Marc J. Sonnenfeld, of the Pennsylvania bar, admitted pro hac vice, and Jason H. Wilson, on the brief).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
The judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Ostrer's opinion, reported at 455 N.J. Super. 69, 187 A.3d 873 (App. Div. 2018).
CHIEF JUSTICE RABNER and JUSTICES LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, PATTERSON, FERNANDEZ-VINA, and TIMPONE join in this opinion. JUSTICE SOLOMON did not participate.