Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronnie Lynn SMITH, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-09-29
Citations: 203 F. App'x 31
Docket Number: No. 05-30582
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronnie Lynn SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: PREGERSON, NOONAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 203
Pages: 31–31

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronnie Lynn SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-30582.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Aug. 16, 2006.
Filed Sept. 29, 2006.
USGF-Office of The U.S. Attorney, Great Falls, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Evangelo Arvanetes, Esq., FDMT-Fed-eral Defenders of Montana, Great Falls, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: PREGERSON, NOONAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
The district court did not solicit the views of counsel before deciding whether to re-sentence Appellant Ronnie Lynn Smith under United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1085 (9th Cir.2005). This mistake requires us to re-remand the case for compliance with Ameline. See United States v. Montgomery, 462 F.3d 1067, 1072 (9th Cir.2006).
REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.