Case Name: Francis Luczak and Helena, his wife, respondents, v. John Mariove and Ilone, his wife, appellants
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1922-02-02
Citations: 93 N.J. Eq. 501
Docket Number: 
Parties: Francis Luczak and Helena, his wife, respondents, v. John Mariove and Ilone, his wife, appellants.
Judges: For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, ‘Black, Katzenbach, White, Williams, Gardner, Van Buskirk — 12.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 93
Pages: 501–501

Head Matter:
Francis Luczak and Helena, his wife, respondents, v. John Mariove and Ilone, his wife, appellants.
[Decided February 2d, 1922.]
On-appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Foster, whose opinion is reported in 9® N. J. Eq. 877.
Mr. John Q. Frey, for the respondents.
Mr. Otto A. Stiefel, for the appellants.

Opinion:
Pee-Curiam.
' The decree appealed- from will be-affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Foster.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, 'Black, Katzenbach, White, Williams, Gardner, Van Buskirk — 12.
For reversal — None.