Case Name: Juan Jose DUPREE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sergeant L. BROWN; Lieutenant Woodrum; Captain D. Crowder, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-03-16
Citations: 89 F. App'x 417
Docket Number: No. 03-7285
Parties: Juan Jose DUPREE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sergeant L. BROWN; Lieutenant Woodrum; Captain D. Crowder, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 89
Pages: 417–417

Head Matter:
Juan Jose DUPREE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sergeant L. BROWN; Lieutenant Woodrum; Captain D. Crowder, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 03-7285.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 25, 2004.
Decided March 16, 2004.
Juan Jose Dupree, Appellant pro se.
John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Juan Jose Dupree appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. See Dupree v. Brown, No. CA-02-3515RDB (D. Md. June 30, 2003). We conclude that Dupree's claim that prison conditions violate the Eighth Amendment is meritless. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED