Case Name: Paul WINESTOCK, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sean MCCAGH, Doctor; Roberts, Doctor; Federal Bureau of Prisons; United States of America, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-10-20
Citations: 112 F. App'x 268
Docket Number: No. 04-6809
Parties: Paul WINESTOCK, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sean MCCAGH, Doctor; Roberts, Doctor; Federal Bureau of Prisons; United States of America, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 112
Pages: 268–268

Head Matter:
Paul WINESTOCK, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sean MCCAGH, Doctor; Roberts, Doctor; Federal Bureau of Prisons; United States of America, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 04-6809.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 14, 2004.
Decided: Oct. 20, 2004.
Paul Winestock, Jr., Appellant pro se.
Frederick William Goundry, III, Varner & Goundry, Frederick, Maryland; Matthew Wayne Mellady, United States Department of Justice, Annapolis Junction, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Paul Winestock, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying relief on his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Winestock v. McCagh, No. CA-03-2599-1-WMN (D.Md. Apr. 20, 2004). Winestock's motion to allow an attachment to his informal brief is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED