Case Name: Leonard EDWARDS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2017-02-22
Citations: 210 So. 3d 266
Docket Number: Case No. 2D15-5724
Parties: Leonard EDWARDS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: NORTHCUTT, KHOUZAM, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 210
Pages: 266–266

Head Matter:
Leonard EDWARDS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Case No. 2D15-5724
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Opinion filed February 22, 2017.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Leonard Edwards appeals the order summarily denying his motion for postcon-viction relief filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(b)(2). We reverse and remand for resentencing.
A jury convicted Edwards of rape in 1972, and the trial court sentenced him to life imprisonment. Edwards alleged in his sworn rule 3.850 motion that because he was sixteen years old when he committed his crime, his life sentence is illegal under Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012), and Horsley v. State, 160 So.3d 393 (Fla. 2015). Relying on McPherson v. State, 138 So.3d 1201, 1202 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014), and Atwell v. State, 128 So.3d 167, 169 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013), the postconviction court denied the motion because Edwards' life sentence did not exclude the possibility of parole. Both of those cases held that Miller was inapplicable to juveniles who were sentenced to life in prison with parole eligibility after a term of years.
While this appeal was pending, the Florida Supreme Court quashed Atwell, holding that "Florida's existing parole system, as set forth by statute, does not provide for individualized consideration of Atwell's juvenile status at the time of the murder, as required by Miller, and that his sentence, which is virtually indistinguishable from a sentence of life without parole, is therefore unconstitutional." Atwell v. State, 197 So.3d 1040, 1041 (Fla. 2016). The court held that juveniles sentenced to life with the possibility of parole are entitled to resentencing in conformance with sections 775.082, 921.1401, and 921.1402, Florida Statutes (2016). Id. at 1042-1043 (citing Horsley v. State, 160 So.3d 393, 395 (Fla. 2015)). See also McPherson v. State, 41 Fla. L. Weekly S578, 2016 WL 6357975 (Fla. Oct. 28, 2016) (quashing this court's decision, with instructions to remand to the trial court for resentencing). Following Atwell, this court recently held that a juvenile who was sentenced to life imprisonment with parole eligibility after twenty-five years was entitled to be resentenced under sections 775.082, 921.1401, and 921.1402, Florida Statutes. See Landy v. State, 205 So.3d 801 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016).
Accordingly, we reverse the order denying Edwards' motion and remand for re-sentencing in conformance with sections 775.082, 921.1401, and 921.1402, Florida Statutes.
Reversed and remanded.
NORTHCUTT, KHOUZAM, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.