Case Name: CITY OF MIAMI, a Florida municipal corporation, and Charles Hawkins, Appellants, v. Emily Barbara MATTATALL, joined by her husband, John Herman Mattatall and John Herman Mattatall, individually, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1967-02-28
Citations: 195 So. 2d 613
Docket Number: No. 66-452
Parties: CITY OF MIAMI, a Florida municipal corporation, and Charles Hawkins, Appellants, v. Emily Barbara MATTATALL, joined by her husband, John Herman Mattatall and John Herman Mattatall, individually, Appellees.
Judges: Before CARROLL, BARKDULL and SWANN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 195
Pages: 613–614

Head Matter:
CITY OF MIAMI, a Florida municipal corporation, and Charles Hawkins, Appellants, v. Emily Barbara MATTATALL, joined by her husband, John Herman Mattatall and John Herman Mattatall, individually, Appellees.
No. 66-452.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
Feb. 28, 1967.
West, Feder & Goldman, Miami, for appellants.
Swink & Swink, Miami, for appellees.
Before CARROLL, BARKDULL and SWANN, JJ.

Opinion:
SWANN, Judge.
The City of Miami, Florida appeals from a final judgment for the plaintiffs, Emily and John Mattatall.
The City claims, on appeal, that the verdicts and judgments were the result of sympathy, passion or prejudice, and that the City should have a new trial or remittitur.
The trial lasted two and one-half days; the transcript of testimony comprises 434 pages; sixteen exhibits were in evidence, and there was a sharp divergence and conflict on almost all issues of fact.
We have considered the record on appeal, the briefs and argument and have determined that the appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error.
The judgments of the trial court are
Affirmed.