Case Name: Robert William SNEDEKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-05-23
Citations: 579 So. 2d 407
Docket Number: No. 90-1725
Parties: Robert William SNEDEKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: W. SHARP, GOSHORN and PETERSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 579
Pages: 407–407

Head Matter:
Robert William SNEDEKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 90-1725.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
May 23, 1991.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Noel A. Pelella, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Judy Taylor Rush, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Snedeker appeals from his sentence of one year in the county jail followed by 24 months on community control. The applicable sentencing guideline brackets, including the "permitted range," do not permit such a sentence pursuant to State v. Van-Kooten, 522 So.2d 830 (Fla.1988) and Burgess v. State, 569 So.2d 829 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). The record reflects that the trial judge was aware that he was exceeding the sentencing guidelines and that no written reasons for the departure were provided. Accordingly, we quash the sentence and remand for resentencing within the guidelines' applicable or permitted ranges.
QUASH SENTENCE; REMAND.
W. SHARP, GOSHORN and PETERSON, JJ., concur.