Case Name: James EDWARDS, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1998-06-10
Citations: 780 So. 2d 86
Docket Number: No. 97-01791
Parties: James EDWARDS, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: PARKER, C.J., and QUINCE and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 780
Pages: 86–86

Head Matter:
James EDWARDS, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 97-01791.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
June 10, 1998.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Jeffrey Sullivan, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ronald Napolitano, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm and certify to the Florida Supreme Court the following question certified in Williams v. State, 700 So.2d 750 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997):
SHOULD THE REQUIREMENT THAT A DEFENDANT PAY FOR DRUG TESTING BE TREATED AS A GENERAL CONDITION OF PROBATION FOR WHICH NOTICE IS PROVIDED BY SECTION 948.09(6), FLORIDA STATUTES (1995), OR SHOULD IT BE TREATED AS A SPECIAL CONDITION THAT REQUIRES ORAL ANNOUNCEMENT?
PARKER, C.J., and QUINCE and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.