Case Name: Mariano Nasello, Appellant, v. Home Insurance Company of New York, Respondent. (Action No. 1.); Rose Nasello, Appellant, v. Home Insurance Company of New York, Respondent. (Action No. 2.); Rose Nasello, Appellant, v. Queens Insurance Company of New York, Respondent. (Action No. 3.); Rose Nasello, Appellant, v. City of New York Insurance Company, Respondent. (Action No. 4.); Rose Nasello, Appellant, v. Royal Insurance Company of England, Respondent. (Action No. 5.); Rose Nasello, Appellant, v. New York Underwriters Insurance Company of New York, Respondent. (Action No. 6.)
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1938-03-08
Citations: 277 N.Y. 632
Docket Number: 
Parties: Mariano Nasello, Appellant, v. Home Insurance Company of New York, Respondent. (Action No. 1.) Rose Nasello, Appellant, v. Home Insurance Company of New York, Respondent. (Action No. 2.) Rose Nasello, Appellant, v. Queens Insurance Company of New York, Respondent. (Action No. 3.) Rose Nasello, Appellant, v. City of New York Insurance Company, Respondent. (Action No. 4.) Rose Nasello, Appellant, v. Royal Insurance Company of England, Respondent. (Action No. 5.) Rose Nasello, Appellant, v. New York Underwriters Insurance Company of New York, Respondent. (Action No. 6.)
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 277
Pages: 632–633

Head Matter:
Mariano Nasello, Appellant, v. Home Insurance Company of New York, Respondent. (Action No. 1.) Rose Nasello, Appellant, v. Home Insurance Company of New York, Respondent. (Action No. 2.) Rose Nasello, Appellant, v. Queens Insurance Company of New York, Respondent. (Action No. 3.) Rose Nasello, Appellant, v. City of New York Insurance Company, Respondent. (Action No. 4.) Rose Nasello, Appellant, v. Royal Insurance Company of England, Respondent. (Action No. 5.) Rose Nasello, Appellant, v. New York Underwriters Insurance Company of New York, Respondent. (Action No. 6.)
Argued January 25, 1938;
decided March 8, 1938.
Walter F. Cherry and William L. Clay for appellants.
Percival D. Oviatt and Robert L. Griffith for respondents.

Opinion:
Judgments affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
. Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O'Brien, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ. Taking no part: Hubbs, J.