Case Name: Elijah BUCKLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jack FREUND, Doctor for Richmond City Jail; Dirck L. Brendlinger, PRCC Orthopedist; Dr. Ofogh, LUCC Doctor, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-05-09
Citations: 34 F. App'x 121
Docket Number: No. 01-6788
Parties: Elijah BUCKLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jack FREUND, Doctor for Richmond City Jail; Dirck L. Brendlinger, PRCC Orthopedist; Dr. Ofogh, LUCC Doctor, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 34
Pages: 121–121

Head Matter:
Elijah BUCKLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jack FREUND, Doctor for Richmond City Jail; Dirck L. Brendlinger, PRCC Orthopedist; Dr. Ofogh, LUCC Doctor, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 01-6788.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 25, 2002.
Decided May 9, 2002.
Elijah Buckley, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Stanulis Skilling, Harman, Claytor, Corrigan & Wellman, Richmond, Virginia; Edward Joseph McNelis, III, Rawls & McNelis, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Elijah Buckley appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Buckley v. Freund, No. CA-99-1682-AM (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 13, 2001; entered Mar. 14, 2001). We deny Buckley's motion for an extension of time to file a supplemental brief and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.