Case Name: PEARSON & MALUSO, M.D., P.A., et al., Appellants, v. William BOTT, etc., et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-07-25
Citations: 584 So. 2d 1035
Docket Number: No. 90-1534
Parties: PEARSON & MALUSO, M.D., P.A., et al., Appellants, v. William BOTT, etc., et al., Appellees.
Judges: GOSHORN, C.J., and DAUKSCH and PETERSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 584
Pages: 1035–1035

Head Matter:
PEARSON & MALUSO, M.D., P.A., et al., Appellants, v. William BOTT, etc., et al., Appellees.
No. 90-1534.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
July 25, 1991.
Rehearing Denied Sept. 11, 1991.
David J. Kohs, Dean, Mead, Egerton, Bloodworth, Capouano & Bozarth, P.A., Orlando, for appellants.
Frederick B. O’Neal, Orlando, for appel-lees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a temporary injunction. We quash the injunction because it was entered without proper verified pleadings or sworn evidentiary support. Additionally, the trial judge failed to make sufficient factual determinations to support the injunction. See e.g., City of Miami v. Coll, 546 So.2d 775 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); United Steelworkers of America v. Seminole Asphalt Refining, Inc., 269 So.2d 28 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972).
The order is quashed and this cause remanded. Should appellee submit a new, proper petition for injunctive relief the court can entertain and grant it, if it deems it appropriate.
ORDER QUASHED; REMANDED.
GOSHORN, C.J., and DAUKSCH and PETERSON, JJ., concur.