Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Demarcus MILLER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-09-07
Citations: 194 F. App'x 781
Docket Number: No. 06-10477
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Demarcus MILLER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before BLACK, BARKETT and COX, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 194
Pages: 781–782

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Demarcus MILLER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-10477
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Sept. 7, 2006.
R. Fletcher Peacock, Peter Warren Kenny, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Orlando, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Roberta Josephina Bodnar, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Orlando, FL, for PlaintiffAppellee.
Before BLACK, BARKETT and COX, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Peter Warren Kenny, counsel for Demarcus Miller, in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Miller's revocation of probation and sentence are AFFIRMED.