Case Name: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Leeshay BENNAIM, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2014-05-28
Citations: 92 A.3d 807
Docket Number: 
Parties: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Leeshay BENNAIM, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 92
Pages: 807–807

Head Matter:
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Leeshay BENNAIM, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
May 28, 2014.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 28th day of May, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by the Commonwealth, is: Did the Superior Court err in determining that the trial court could unilaterally shorten the terms of a 3 year old bargained for plea agreement in order for [Respondent] to avoid the collateral consequences of SORNA, ignoring established precedent and denying the Commonwealth the benefit of its plea agreement?