Case Name: Dwayne A. JACKSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-02-01
Citations: 155 S.W.3d 835
Docket Number: No. ED 84413
Parties: Dwayne A. JACKSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 155
Pages: 835–836

Head Matter:
Dwayne A. JACKSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 84413.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Feb. 1, 2005.
Amanda R. Schehr, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Evan J. Buchheim, Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Dwayne A. Jackson appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing. He alleges his plea counsel provided ineffective assistance by advising him to plead guilty without investigating the facts or researching the law and by failing to request a mental evaluation.
Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).