Case Name: Alonzo REED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. D.L. RUNNELS; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-02-15
Citations: 267 F. App'x 563
Docket Number: No. 07-16207
Parties: Alonzo REED, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. D.L. RUNNELS; et al., Defendants— Appellees.
Judges: Before: WALLACE, LEAVY and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 267
Pages: 563–563

Head Matter:
Alonzo REED, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. D.L. RUNNELS; et al., Defendants— Appellees.
No. 07-16207.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 11, 2008 .
Filed Feb. 15, 2008.
Alonzo Reed, Represa, CA, pro se.
Grant Lien, Esq., AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: WALLACE, LEAVY and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Upon review of the record and appellant's opening brief, this court hereby summarily affirms the district court's order denying appellant's motion for preliminary injunctive relief. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (summary affirmance appropriate where result is clear from face of record).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.