Case Name: W & H Equities, LLC, Respondent, v. Marvin Odums, Appellant, et al., Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2017-05-24
Citations: 150 A.D.3d 1176
Docket Number: 
Parties: W & H Equities, LLC, Respondent, v Marvin Odums, Appellant, et al., Defendants.
Judges: Mastro, J.P., Chambers, Roman and Connolly, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 150
Pages: 1176–1176

Head Matter:
W & H Equities, LLC, Respondent, v Marvin Odums, Appellant, et al., Defendants.
[52 NYS3d 662]

Opinion:
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Marvin Odums appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dabiri, J.), dated May 6, 2013, which denied his motion for recusal, to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale dated August 2, 2011, and to set aside the foreclosure sale held pursuant thereto.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the appellant's motion which sought recusal, as the appellant failed to set forth any proof of bias or prejudice on the part of the court which would have warranted recusal (see Sassower v Gannett Co., Inc., 109 AD3d 607, 609 [2013]; Daniels v City of New York, 96 AD3d 895, 895 [2012]; see also Judiciary Law § 14).
Further, the appellant failed to establish any grounds for vacating the judgment of foreclosure and sale dated August 11, 2011, or to set aside the foreclosure sale held pursuant thereto (see W & H Equities LLC v Odums, 113 AD3d 840 [2014]; see also CPLR 5015 [a]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied those branches of the appellant's motion which were to vacate the judgment and sale.
The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.
Mastro, J.P., Chambers, Roman and Connolly, JJ., concur.