Case Name: Danny HOSKIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Helen F. FAHEY; David N. Harker; Carol Ann Sievers; Herbert Coulton; Michael M. Hawes, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-10-15
Citations: 110 F. App'x 361
Docket Number: No. 04-7144
Parties: Danny HOSKIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Helen F. FAHEY; David N. Harker; Carol Ann Sievers; Herbert Coulton; Michael M. Hawes, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 110
Pages: 361–362

Head Matter:
Danny HOSKIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Helen F. FAHEY; David N. Harker; Carol Ann Sievers; Herbert Coulton; Michael M. Hawes, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 04-7144.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 7, 2004.
Decided Oct. 15, 2004.
Danny Hoskin, Appellant pro se.
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Danny Hoskin appeals the district court's orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying his motion to alter or amend judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hoskin v. Fahey, No. CA-04-192 (E.D.Va. filed Apr. 7, 2004 & entered Apr. 12, 2004; filed June 22, 2004 & entered June 24, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED