Case Name: Margaret M. Robillard, Respondent, v. Dean Robbins, III, et al., Appellants
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1991-11-25
Citations: 78 N.Y.2d 1105
Docket Number: 
Parties: Margaret M. Robillard, Respondent, v Dean Robbins, III, et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 78
Pages: 1105–1106

Head Matter:
Margaret M. Robillard, Respondent, v Dean Robbins, III, et al., Appellants.
Argued October 16, 1991;
decided November 25, 1991
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
James L. Pemberton for appellants.
Harold D. Gordon for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
While defendants urge that it was error to allow plaintiffs medical expert to express opinions on the very questions to be resolved by the jury, their general objections were insufficient to preserve a law issue for our review (see, Matter of Gonzalez v State Liq. Auth., 30 NY2d 108, 112-113; Wightman v Campbell, 217 NY 479, 482-483).
Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.