Case Name: Frankie L. MCCOY, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PRISON HEALTH SERVICE, Incorporated; M. Ayalew, Md; Dazoulowe Mimose, Ms., Admin-Nurse; D. Hood, Ms., Admin-Nurse; Kiwuka Nsubuga, P.A.; Renee Gloria; Connie Burt, Administrative Nurse; James V. Pegeuse, Acting Warden; Lieutenant Staton; Dereje Tesfaye, Doctor; Pat Nelson, Administrative Nurse, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-11-12
Citations: 80 F. App'x 832
Docket Number: No. 03-6706
Parties: Frankie L. MCCOY, Sr., Plaintiff—Appellant, v. PRISON HEALTH SERVICE, Incorporated; M. Ayalew, Md; Dazoulowe Mimose, Ms., Admin-Nurse; D. Hood, Ms., Admin-Nurse; Kiwuka Nsubuga, P.A.; Renee Gloria; Connie Burt, Administrative Nurse; James V. Pe geuse, Acting Warden; Lieutenant Staton; Dereje Tesfaye, Doctor; Pat Nelson, Administrative Nurse, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 80
Pages: 832–833

Head Matter:
Frankie L. MCCOY, Sr., Plaintiff—Appellant, v. PRISON HEALTH SERVICE, Incorporated; M. Ayalew, Md; Dazoulowe Mimose, Ms., Admin-Nurse; D. Hood, Ms., Admin-Nurse; Kiwuka Nsubuga, P.A.; Renee Gloria; Connie Burt, Administrative Nurse; James V. Pe geuse, Acting Warden; Lieutenant Staton; Dereje Tesfaye, Doctor; Pat Nelson, Administrative Nurse, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 03-6706.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 31, 2003.
Decided Nov. 12, 2003.
Frankie L. McCoy, Sr., pro se.
Donald Joseph Crawford, Aldelman, Sheff & Smith, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
Frankie L. McCoy, Sr., appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and motion for injunctive relief. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See McCoy v. Prison Health Serv., Inc., No. CA-01-1498-L (D. Md. filed Mar. 25, 2003 & entered Mar. 27, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED