Case Name: Ex parte Gary GRAHAM
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1993-04-27
Citations: 853 S.W.2d 564
Docket Number: No. 17568-02
Parties: Ex parte Gary GRAHAM.
Judges: CLINTON, J., would grant the stay.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 853
Pages: 564–565

Head Matter:
Ex parte Gary GRAHAM.
No. 17568-02.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.
April 27, 1993.
Certiorari Denied May 24, 1993.
See 113 S.Ct. 2431.
Anthony S. Haughton, Robert C. Owen, Mandy Welch, Houston, Richard Burr, New York City, Michael E. Tigar, Austin, for appellant.
John B. Holmes, Jr., Dist. Atty., and Roe Wilson, Asst. Dist. Atty., Houston, Robert S. Walt, Asst. Atty. Gen., Robert Huttash, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
This is a post conviction application for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to the provisions of Art. 11.07, V.A.C.C.P.
On October 28, 1981, applicant was convicted of the offense of capital murder. After the jury returned affirmative answers to the special issues submitted under Art. 37.071, V.A.C.C.P., punishment was assessed at death. This Court affirmed applicant's conviction on direct appeal. Graham v. State, No. 68,916, (Tex.Cr.App. delivered June 12, 1984). The trial court has scheduled applicant's execution to be carried out on or before sunrise, April 29, 1993.
In the instant cause, applicant presents four allegations in which he challenges the validity of his conviction or resulting sentence. The trial court has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law and recommended the relief sought be denied.
This Court has reviewed the record. The findings and conclusions entered by the trial court are supported by the record and upon such basis the relief is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
CLINTON, J., would grant the stay.
MILLER, J., not participating.