Case Name: CHRYSLER CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-05-14
Citations: 604 F.3d 1378
Docket Number: No. 2009-1267
Parties: CHRYSLER CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, MAYER, LOURIE, RADER, BRYSON, GAJARSA, LINN, DYK, PROST, and MOORE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 604
Pages: 1378–1381

Head Matter:
CHRYSLER CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 2009-1267.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
May 14, 2010.
Alan Goggins, Barnes, Richardson & Colburn, of New York, NY, filed a combined petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the petition were Lawrence M. Friedman and Eric W. Lander.
Tara K. Hogan, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, filed a response to the petition for defendant-appellee. With her on the response were Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, and Todd M. Hughes, Deputy Director.
Bruce J. Casino, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, of Washington, DC, for amicus curiae Ford Motor Company. With him on the brief were Catherine S. Wood; and Paulsen K. Vandevert, Ford Motor Company, of Dearborn, Michigan.
Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, MAYER, LOURIE, RADER, BRYSON, GAJARSA, LINN, DYK, PROST, and MOORE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ON PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC
PER CURIAM.
ORDER
Plaintiff-Appellant Chrysler Corporation filed a combined petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en bane. The panel requested a response from Defendanb-Appellee the United States. The court granted Ford Motor Company leave to file a brief amicus curiae in support of Plaintiff-Appellant's combined.petition.
The petition for rehearing was considered by the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition for rehearing en banc, the response to the petition, and amicus curiae brief were referred to the circuit judges who are authorized to request a poll on whether to rehear the appeal en banc. A poll was requested, taken, and failed.
Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) The petition of Plaintiff-Appellant Chrysler Corporation for panel rehearing is denied.
(2) The petition of Plaintiff-Appellant Chrysler Corporation for rehearing en banc is denied.
(3) The mandate of the court will issue on May 21, 2010.
NEWMAN, Circuit Judge, dissents from the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc.