Case Name: CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Respondent, v. Tyris BURNETT, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2015-11-24
Citations: 477 S.W.3d 175
Docket Number: No. ED 102447
Parties: CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Respondent, v. Tyris BURNETT, Appellant.
Judges: Before Robert G. Dowd,¡ Jr., B.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Roy L. Richter, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 477
Pages: 175–176

Head Matter:
CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Respondent, v. Tyris BURNETT, Appellant.
No. ED 102447
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
FILED: November 24, 2015
Stephen Michael Ryals, The Ryals Law Firm, P.O. Box Í1065, Ferguson, MO 63135, Attorney for Appellant.
Rory Patrick O’Sullivan, J. Brent Dulle, Co-Counsel, 1200 Market Street, Room 314, St. Louis, MO 63103, Attorneys for Respondent.
Before Robert G. Dowd,¡ Jr., B.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Roy L. Richter, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
In this consolidated appeal, Tyris Burnett (Appellant) appeals'from the judgment of :the circuit court finding Appellant guilty 'of interfering with a police officer and resisting arrest, in violation of Section 15.10.010 of the Revised Code of the City of St. Louis. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file; and the record on appeal-and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).