Case Name: SHERMAN v. SHERMAN
Court: Michigan Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Michigan
Decision Date: 1925-12-22
Citations: 232 Mich. 657
Docket Number: Docket No. 71
Parties: SHERMAN v. SHERMAN.
Judges: McDonald, C. J., and Bird, Sharpe, Moore, Steere, Fellows, and Wiest, JJ., concurred.
Reporter: Michigan Reports
Volume: 232
Pages: 657–658

Head Matter:
SHERMAN v. SHERMAN.
Appeal and Error — Trial by Court Without Jury — Written Findings Necessary to Review.
In an action tried before tbe court without a jury, where there was no request for written findings of fact and law and none were filed, under the statute (3 Comp. Laws 1915, § 12586) and the rule (Circuit Court Rule No. 45), the record presents no question which the Supreme Court can review on a writ of error.
Error to superior court of Grand Rapids; Verdier (Leonard D.), J.
Submitted October 14, 1925.
(Docket No. 71.)
Decided Dec. 22, 1925.
Assumpsit by Florence Sherman against Salim F. Sherman and another upon a promissory note. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants bring error.
Affirmed.
Arthur F. Shaw, for appellants.
Appeal and Error, 3 C. J. § 766.

Opinion:
Clark, J.
Plaintiff declared on a promissory note for $700 and had judgment in a trial without a jury. Defendants bring error. The record shows no request for written findings of fact and law and none were filed. There is nothing we can review. It was held in Robbins v. Simons Sales Co., 218 Mich. 569, quoting syllabus:
"In an action tried before the court without a jury, where there was no request for written findings of fact and law and none were filed, under the statute (3 Comp. Laws 1915, § 12586) and the rule (Circuit
Court Rule No. 45), the record presents no question which the Supreme Court can review on a writ of error."
Judgment affirmed.
McDonald, C. J., and Bird, Sharpe, Moore, Steere, Fellows, and Wiest, JJ., concurred.