Case Name: RAMSEY v. BAKER et al.
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1915-04-13
Citations: 46 Okla. 10
Docket Number: No. 4058
Parties: RAMSEY v. BAKER et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 46
Pages: 10–11

Head Matter:
RAMSEY v. BAKER et al.
No. 4058.
Opinion Filed April 13, 1915.
(148 Pac. 94.)
APPEAL AND ERROR — Dismissal—Failure to File Brief. Where plaintiff in error has filed no brief, as required by rule 7 of this court 38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix.,) the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution.
('Syllabus by Rittenhouse, C.)
JSn'or from District Court, Coal County; Robt. M. Rainey, Judge.
Action by Frank Baker against the Oklahoma Central Railway Company, a. corporation, and others.- Judgment for plaintiff and defendant Asa E. Ramsey, as receiver of the Oklahoma Central Railway Companj', a corporation, brings error.
'Dismissed.
J. G. Ralls and Fooshee & Brunson, for plaintiff in error.
Dorset Garter, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
RITTENHOUSE, C.
The petition in error and the transcript of the record in this case was filed in this court on June S, 1912." Neither party has filed a brief, nor have they offered •any excuse for the failure to da so-. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned.
The petition in error should therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution, under rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix). Nicholson v. Bournes, 42 Okla. 250, 140 Pac. 1155.
By the Court: It is so ordered.