Case Name: ARTHO v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1928-01-04
Citations: 1 S.W.2d 629
Docket Number: No. 11319
Parties: ARTHO v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 1
Pages: 629–630

Head Matter:
ARTHO v. STATE.
(No. 11319.)
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Jan. 4, 1928.
W. H. Russell, of Hereford, for appellant.
A. A. Dawson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for tlie State.

Opinion:
LATTIMORE, J.
Conviction for possessing intoxicating liquor for purposes of sale; punishment, one year in tlie penitentiary.
Appellant's motion for new trial was overruled on May 17, 1927. The statement of facts shows to have been filed on August 17, 1927. The statute (Code Cr. Proc. 1925, art. 760) allows 90 days for the filing of Statement of facts, after the overruling of the motion for new trial. The statement of facts was filed two days too late. Same cannot be considered.
There are three bills of exception. Each has been carefully considered. We find nothing in any calling for discussion here. None present error.
The judgment will be affirmed.