Case Name: BENHAM v. MILLER
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1926-07-14
Citations: 4 Ohio Law Abs. 664
Docket Number: No. 19974
Parties: BENHAM v. MILLER
Judges: 
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 4
Pages: 664–664

Head Matter:
BENHAM v. MILLER
No. 19974.
Supreme Court
Dock. July 14, 1926;
4 Abs. 493.
Attorneys — S. W. Bennett, for Benham; H. A. Williams and G. R. Hedges for Miller; all of Columbus.

Opinion:
It appears that an application for the appointment of Receivers for William G. Benham and Dwight Harrison was made to the Franklin Common Pleas and that by agreement of counsel a Receiver was not appointed but an injunction was granted restraining Benham and Harrison from disposing of any of their property and ordering said parties to keep their property in status quo.
Subsequently the Common Pleas appointed a Receiver for William G. Benham in violation of the agreement of counsel. A petition in error was dismissed by the Court of Appeals on the ground of no jurisdiction.
Benham in the Supreme Court contends:
1. That the court had no authority to appoint a receiver in violation of the agreement .between counsel.
2. That the Court of Appeals erred in dismissing the petition in error.