Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald Daniel ROBINSON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-03-31
Citations: 683 F. App'x 855
Docket Number: No. 16-15030 Non-Argument Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald Daniel ROBINSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JULIE CARNES and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 683
Pages: 855–856

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald Daniel ROBINSON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-15030 Non-Argument Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
(March 31, 2017)
David Charles Waterman, Arthur Lee Bentley, III, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, Kristen A. Fiore, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Pensacola, FL, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee
Donna Lee Elm, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Orlando, FL for Defendant-Appellant
Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JULIE CARNES and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Stephen J. Langs, appointed counsel for Donald Daniel Robinson in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Robinson's convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.