Case Name: Paul O. STOVALL, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-08-31
Citations: 768 So. 2d 444
Docket Number: No. SC95059
Parties: Paul O. STOVALL, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 768
Pages: 444–445

Head Matter:
Paul O. STOVALL, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. SC95059.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Aug. 31, 2000.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Susan A. Fagan, Assistant Public Defend er, Seventh Judicial Circuit, Daytona Beach, Florida, for Petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Kellie A. Nielan, Mary G. Jolley, Belle B. Schumann, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorneys General, Daytona Beach, Florida, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have for review Stovall v. State, 727 So.2d 1009 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999), a decision of the Fifth District Court of Appeal citing as controlling authority its decision in Maddox v. State, 708 So.2d 617 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), approved in part, disapproved in part, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla.2000). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418, 420 (Fla.1981). We quash the district court's decision in this case and remand for consideration in light of our opinion in Maddox v. State, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla.2000).
It is so ordered.
WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.