Case Name: PARK, Respondent, v. PARK, Appellant.
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1905-12-22
Citations: 95 N.Y.S. 1150
Docket Number: 
Parties: PARK, Respondent, v. PARK, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 95
Pages: 1150–1150

Head Matter:
PARK, Respondent, v. PARK, Appellant.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
December 22, 1905.)
Appeal from Special Term, New York County. Action by Walter E. Park against Edith Park. From an order denying a motion for leave to renew the application to interpose a supplemental answer, defendant appeals. Reversed. A. Garruthers, for appellant. D. May, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Considering the nature of the action, we think that the defendant should be allowed to serve a supplemental answer. The fact that she did not make the affidavit is explained by her absence in Europe, sick. The order appealed from should be reversed, and the motion granted.
PATTERSON, J" dissents.