Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marcellus THOMAS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-06-30
Citations: 137 F. App'x 587
Docket Number: No. 05-6431
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marcellus THOMAS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 137
Pages: 587–588

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marcellus THOMAS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-6431.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 21, 2005.
Decided: June 30, 2005.
Marcellus Thomas, Appellant pro se. Thomas Richard Ascik, Office of the United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Marcellus Thomas appeals the district court's order denying his renewed motion for transcripts at government expense. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Thomas, No. CR-00-233 (W.D.N.C. filed Mar. 3 & entered Mar. 4, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED