Case Name: In the Matter of the Claim of Charles Breitel, Appellant, against Samuel Hinderstein et al., Doing Business as Hinderstein Bros., et al., Respondents. State Industrial Board, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1933-01-27
Citations: 261 N.Y. 556
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Claim of Charles Breitel, Appellant, against Samuel Hinderstein et al., Doing Business as Hinderstein Bros., et al., Respondents. State Industrial Board, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 261
Pages: 556–557

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Claim of Charles Breitel, Appellant, against Samuel Hinderstein et al., Doing Business as Hinderstein Bros., et al., Respondents. State Industrial Board, Appellant.
(Argued January 11, 1933;
decided January 27, 1933.)
Henry L. Redner for claimant-appellant.
John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General (Joseph A. McLaughlin and Isaac Frank of counsel), for State Industrial Board, appellant.
William S. Sinclair, James J. Mahoney and George J. Stacy for respondents.

Opinion:
Order afiirmed, with costs against State Industrial Board; no opinion.
Concur: Pound, Ch. J., Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O'Brien, Hubbs and Crouch, JJ.