Case Name: Edward J. SCHOCK, Petitioner v. CITY OF LEBANON, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2017-12-27
Citations: 176 A.3d 857
Docket Number: No. 609 MAL 2017
Parties: Edward J. SCHOCK, Petitioner v. CITY OF LEBANON, Respondent
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 176
Pages: 857–857

Head Matter:
Edward J. SCHOCK, Petitioner v. CITY OF LEBANON, Respondent
No. 609 MAL 2017
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
December 27, 2017

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 27th day of December, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
Where subsection 5(f)(2) of the Neighborhood Improvement District Act, Act of December 20, 2000, P.L. 949, No. 130 provides for veto of a final plan "[i]f 40% or more of the affected property owners within the proposed NID [neighborhood improvement district] register' their disapproval," is the term "affected property owners within the proposed NID" limited to the owners of properties to be assessed under the plan or does the term include the owners of all properties that are within the physical boundaries of the district?