Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward Otis RUTLAND, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-03-29
Citations: 6 F. App'x 201
Docket Number: No. 00-7649
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward Otis RUTLAND, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 6
Pages: 201–202

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward Otis RUTLAND, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 00-7649.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 22, 2001.
Decided March 29, 2001.
Edward Otis Rutland, pro se. Jane Barrett Taylor, Office of the United States Attorney, Columbia, SC, for appellee.
Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Edward Otis Rutland appeals the district court's order denying his motion for modification of sentence. We have re viewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Rutland, No. CR-91-132 (D.S.C. Oct. 10, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.