Case Name: CITY OF MIAMI, Petitioner, v. George Lee GRONER, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1964-05-13
Citations: 164 So. 2d 203
Docket Number: No. 33327
Parties: CITY OF MIAMI, Petitioner, v. George Lee GRONER, Respondent.
Judges: DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 164
Pages: 203–204

Head Matter:
CITY OF MIAMI, Petitioner, v. George Lee GRONER, Respondent.
No. 33327.
Supreme Court of Florida.
May 13, 1964.
John R. Barrett, City Atty., and Anthony F. Paterna, Asst. City Atty., for petitioner.
Joseph J. Gersten and Arthur Roth, Miami, for George Lee Groner.
Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for Florida Industrial Commission.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date January 28, 1964.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.
DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and O'CONNELL, JJ., concur.