Case Name: George Gentile, Appellant, v. Joseph P. Hildman et al., Individually and Doing Business as Specialty Motor & Brake Service, Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1956-10-31
Citations: 2 A.D.2d 871
Docket Number: 
Parties: George Gentile, Appellant, v. Joseph P. Hildman et al., Individually and Doing Business as Specialty Motor & Brake Service, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 2
Pages: 871–871

Head Matter:
George Gentile, Appellant, v. Joseph P. Hildman et al., Individually and Doing Business as Specialty Motor & Brake Service, Respondents.

Opinion:
Judgment reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the evidence presented questions of fact as to negligence and contributory negligence. All concur. (Appeal from a judgment of Onondaga Trial Term dismissing the complaint at the close of plaintiff's case, in a negligence action.) Present—MeCurn, P. J., Vaughan, Wheeler, Williams and Bastow, JJ.