Case Name: Frank Briscuso, as Executor of Mary Garnas, Also Known as Mary E. Garnas, Deceased, Respondent, v. Edison Parking Corp. et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1995-12-21
Citations: 222 A.D.2d 328
Docket Number: 
Parties: Frank Briscuso, as Executor of Mary Garnas, Also Known as Mary E. Garnas, Deceased, Respondent, v Edison Parking Corp. et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 222
Pages: 328–328

Head Matter:
Frank Briscuso, as Executor of Mary Garnas, Also Known as Mary E. Garnas, Deceased, Respondent, v Edison Parking Corp. et al., Appellants.
[635 NYS2d 615]

Opinion:
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Arber, J.), entered on or about May 2, 1995, which granted defendants' motion for preclusion unless plaintiff served a bill of particulars within 60 days of the court's order, modified, on the law, to make preclusion unconditional, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
There being a conflict between the court's decision, which grants preclusion unconditionally, and its order, which grants preclusion conditionally, the decision controls, and the order should be resettled accordingly (DiProspero v Ford Motor Co., 105 AD2d 479, 480). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Rubin, Asch and Mazzarelli, JJ.
Kupferman, J., dissents in a memorandum as follows: I would remand to the IAS Judge.
The IAS Judge obviously had second thoughts on the matter and should be the one to make the choice.