Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bruce L. McCLELLAND, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-09-05
Citations: 45 F. App'x 266
Docket Number: No. 02-4352
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bruce L. McCLELLAND, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 45
Pages: 266–267

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bruce L. McCLELLAND, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-4352.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 29, 2002.
Decided Sept. 5, 2002.
Bruce L. McClelland, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Conrad Myers, Office of the Staff Judge Advocate, Langley Air Force Base, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Bruce L. McClelland was convicted by a magistrate judge of a traffic offense. He filed an appeal with the federal district court. On February 25, 2002, the district court dismissed McClelland's appeal. McClelland now seeks to appeal the district court's order. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because McClel-land's notice of appeal was not timely filed.
Parties are accorded ten days after the entry of the district court's final judgment or order to note an appeal, see Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(1), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(4). This appeal period is "mandatory and jurisdictional." United States v. Raynor, 939 F.2d 191, 197 (4th Cir.1991); United States v. Schuchardt, 685 F.2d 901, 902 (4th Cir.1982).
The district court's order was entered on the docket on February 25, 2002. McClelland's notice of appeal was filed on April 24, 2002. Because McClelland failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension, we .dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.