Case Name: Adam Troy SCIPPIO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1986-05-13
Citations: 488 So. 2d 144
Docket Number: Nos. 84-2315, 84-2324
Parties: Adam Troy SCIPPIO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before BASKIN, FERGUSON, and JOR-GENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 488
Pages: 144–144

Head Matter:
Adam Troy SCIPPIO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Nos. 84-2315, 84-2324.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 13, 1986.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Marti Rothenberg and Thomas Murray, Asst. Public Defenders, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Charles M. Fahlbusch, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before BASKIN, FERGUSON, and JOR-GENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the order revoking the appellant's probation, Case No. 84-2324, and his conviction of the substantive offense of armed robbery, Case No. 84-2315. See Christopher v. State, 407 So.2d 198 (Fla.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 910, 102 S.Ct. 1761, 72 L.Ed.2d 169 (1982); Freiheit v. State, 458 So.2d 1172 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Ben-Hain v. Tacher, 418 So.2d 1107 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Strate v. Strate, 328 So.2d 29 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 336 So.2d 1184 (Fla.1976); Gibbs v. State, 193 So.2d 460 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967).
We, nevertheless, vacate the sentences imposed and remand for re-sentencing based upon the state's concession that the calculations in the guidelines score sheet were improper.
Convictions affirmed; sentences vacated; cause remanded for re-sentencing.