Case Name: Gregory HARVEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Christopher FARBER, County Sheriff, Herkimer County Jail, et al., Defendants-Cross Defendants-Appellees. Charlene Macri, County Jail Nurse Practitioner, Herkimer County Sheriffs Department, Defendant-Cross Claimant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-04-21
Citations: 646 F. App'x 116
Docket Number: No. 13-2551
Parties: Gregory HARVEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Christopher FARBER, County Sheriff, Herkimer County Jail, et al., Defendants-Cross Defendants-Appellees. Charlene Macri, County Jail Nurse Practitioner, Herkimer County Sheriffs Department, Defendant-Cross Claimant.
Judges: PRESENT: ROBERT D. SACK, RICHARD C. WESLEY and GERARD E. LYNCH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 646
Pages: 116–116

Head Matter:
Gregory HARVEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Christopher FARBER, County Sheriff, Herkimer County Jail, et al., Defendants-Cross Defendants-Appellees. Charlene Macri, County Jail Nurse Practitioner, Herkimer County Sheriffs Department, Defendant-Cross Claimant.
No. 13-2551.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
April 21, 2016.
Gregory Harvey, Ossining, NY, pro se.
Thomas K. Murphy, Murphy, Bums, Barber & Murphy, LLP, Albany, NY, for Appellees.
PRESENT: ROBERT D. SACK, RICHARD C. WESLEY and GERARD E. LYNCH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
SUMMARY ORDER
Plaintiff-Appellant Gregory Harvey, proceeding pro se, appeals from the District Court's entry of judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims following a jury trial. We assume the parties' familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history of the case, and the issues on appeal.
Harvey has provided us with no reason to disturb the District Court's judgment. The only issue he raises on appeal is whether his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to introduce certain evidence at trial. It is well established, however, that, except when faced with the prospect of imprisonment, the Sixth Amendment right to counsel does not apply in a civil ease. See, e.g., Guggenheim Capital, LLC v. Bimbaun, 722 F.3d 444, 453 (2d Cir.2013); United States v. Coven, 662 F.2d 162, 176 (2d Cir.1981).
Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of the District Court.