Case Name: Darren M. GROEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1997-04-18
Citations: 691 So. 2d 1171
Docket Number: No. 96-1323
Parties: Darren M. GROEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ALLEN, WEBSTER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 691
Pages: 1171–1172

Head Matter:
Darren M. GROEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 96-1323.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
April 18, 1997.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Darren M. Groen, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and James W. Rogers, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this direct criminal appeal, the public defender has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Appellant has also filed a brief in proper person. Having reviewed the entire record, and considered the issues raised by appellant, we agree that no error requiring reversal of either the conviction or sentence occurred. Accordingly, we affirm the conviction, and the sentence imposed. However, we note that five "judgments and restitution orders" were entered, directing appellant to pay substantial amounts in restitution. It does not appear from the record that appellant received notice of the intent to seek restitution, or an opportunity to be heard. Accordingly, we reverse the "judgments and restitution orders." See, e.g., Norman v. State, 659 So.2d 722 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Williams v. State, 580 So.2d 345 (Fla. Bd DCA 1991). On remand, the trial court may again award restitution, provided that it complies with all applicable law.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; and REMANDED, with directions.
ALLEN, WEBSTER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.