Case Name: EMPIREGAS, INC. OF DADE CITY, Appellant, v. JOE HERRMANN'S, INC., Appellee; JOE HERRMANN'S, INC., Appellant, v. EMPIREGAS, INC. OF DADE CITY, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1986-02-28
Citations: 483 So. 2d 876
Docket Number: Nos. 85-533, 85-1470
Parties: EMPIREGAS, INC. OF DADE CITY, Appellant, v. JOE HERRMANN’S, INC., Appellee. JOE HERRMANN’S, INC., Appellant, v. EMPIREGAS, INC. OF DADE CITY, Appellee.
Judges: LEHAN, A.C.J., and FRANK and HALL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 483
Pages: 876–876

Head Matter:
EMPIREGAS, INC. OF DADE CITY, Appellant, v. JOE HERRMANN’S, INC., Appellee. JOE HERRMANN’S, INC., Appellant, v. EMPIREGAS, INC. OF DADE CITY, Appellee.
Nos. 85-533, 85-1470.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Feb. 28, 1986.
E. David Tyner, Dade City, and John F. Kizer, Jr., Birmingham, Ala., for Empire-gas, Inc.
Joe A. McClain of McClain, Dwyer & Sestak, P.A., Dade City, for Joe Herr-mann’s, Inc.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court's final judgments for the plaintiff, Joe Herrmann's, Inc., on the original complaint and for the defendant, Empiregas, Inc. of Dade City, on its counterclaim.
We address only one aspect of this rather involved litigation. We agree with defendant that the trial court properly dismissed plaintiffs counterclaim which was filed in response to defendant's counterclaim. See Vines v. Emerald Equipment Co., 342 So.2d 137 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).
Affirmed.
LEHAN, A.C.J., and FRANK and HALL, JJ., concur.