Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Catherine Dankenbrink, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2017-01-11
Citations: 146 A.D.3d 802
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Catherine Dankenbrink, Appellant.
Judges: Leventhal, J.P., Austin, Cohen, Hinds-Radix and LaSalle, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 146
Pages: 802–803

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Catherine Dankenbrink, Appellant.
[43 NYS3d 913]

Opinion:
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (IDV Part) (Bogle, J.), rendered January 15, 2016, convicting her of criminal contempt in the second degree (two counts), upon her plea of guilty (O'Brien, J.), and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).
Leventhal, J.P., Austin, Cohen, Hinds-Radix and LaSalle, JJ., concur.