Case Name: Flaubert MBONGO; Charlotte J. Dikongue, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-01-27
Citations: 552 F. App'x 258
Docket Number: No. 13-2115
Parties: Flaubert MBONGO; Charlotte J. Dikongue, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 552
Pages: 258–258

Head Matter:
Flaubert MBONGO; Charlotte J. Dikongue, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 13-2115.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 23, 2014.
Decided: Jan. 27, 2014.
Flaubert Mbongo, Charlotte J. Dikongue, Appellants Pro Se. John Sears Simcox, Simcox & Barclay, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Flaubert Mbongo and Charlotte Dikongue appeal the district court's order granting summary judgment to the Defendants in their civil action related to a mortgage modification plan under the federal Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mbongo v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 8:12-cv-00872-PJM, 2013 WL 4052823 (D.Md. Aug. 9, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.