Case Name: John CLARK, Respondent, v. St. Louis METAL and Recycling Company, Inc., and Demetrious Hester, Appellants.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2019-04-16
Citations: 571 S.W.3d 700
Docket Number: No. ED 106187
Parties: John CLARK, Respondent,
v.
St. Louis METAL and Recycling Company, Inc., and Demetrious Hester, Appellants.
Judges: Before Philip M. Hess, P.J. and Robert G. Dowd, Jr. and Mary K. Hoff, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 571
Pages: 700–701

Head Matter:
John CLARK, Respondent,
v.
St. Louis METAL and Recycling Company, Inc., and Demetrious Hester, Appellants.
No. ED 106187
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Filed: April 16, 2019
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: Richard J. Magee, 200 South Hanley Road, Suite 500, Clayton, MO 63105.
ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT: Sean M. Flaherty, 301 Main Street, P. O. Box 800, Hillsboro, MO 63050.
Before Philip M. Hess, P.J. and Robert G. Dowd, Jr. and Mary K. Hoff, JJ.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
St. Louis Metal and Recycling Company, Inc. and Demetrious Hester ("Appellants") appeal from a judgment denying their motion to amend the judgment entered against them and in favor of John Clark following a bench trial. Finding no obvious abuse of discretion, we affirm.
An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).