Case Name: STATE ex FULTON v. BLACKBURN
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1937
Citations: 26 Ohio Law Abs. 381
Docket Number: No 16006
Parties: STATE ex FULTON v BLACKBURN
Judges: GUERNSEY, PJ, CROW and KLINGER, JJ, (3rd Dist) sitting by designation.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 26
Pages: 381–382

Head Matter:
STATE ex FULTON v BLACKBURN
Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist, Cuyahoga Co
No 16006.
Homer H. Marshman, Cleveland, for plaintiff-appellant.
Davies & Eshner, Cleveland, for defendant-appellee.
GUERNSEY, PJ, CROW and KLINGER, JJ, (3rd Dist) sitting by designation.

Opinion:
OPINION
By THE COURT
The governing statute of limitation is §10509-144, GC, and not §10509-112 and 10509-134, GC, nor §10509-133 GC, the claimed superadded liability having been only contingent and not a provable claim until the assessment was made.
51 Oh Ap page 61 (18 Abs 482) syllabus 1.
Want of plea of the bar of the applicable statute does not preclude its enforcement.
2 Ohio C. C. Reports 140.
We find no error and the judgment will be affirmed at the costs of the defendants and the cause remanded for execution. Exceptions may be saved.
GUERNSEY, PJ, CROW and KLINGER, JJ, concur.