Case Name: Oranie Galindo FORBES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dan L. DOVE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-08-20
Citations: 42 F. App'x 660
Docket Number: No. 02-6697
Parties: Oranie Galindo FORBES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dan L. DOVE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 42
Pages: 660–660

Head Matter:
Oranie Galindo FORBES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dan L. DOVE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 02-6697.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 15, 2002.
Decided Aug. 20, 2002.
Oranie Galindo Forbes, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Oranie Galindo Forbes appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Forbes v. Dove, CA-01-30-7-24BG (D.S.C. Apr. 11, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.