Case Name: The HERTZ CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald COX and Sarah C. Crowe, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1971-02-02
Citations: 436 F.2d 1376
Docket Number: No. 26251
Parties: The HERTZ CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald COX and Sarah C. Crowe, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 436
Pages: 1376–1376

Head Matter:
The HERTZ CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald COX and Sarah C. Crowe, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 26251.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Feb. 2, 1971.
M. W. Parse, Jr., Leon Jaworski, Stephen D. Susman, Houston, Tex., Donald M. Pain, Atlanta, Ga., John Murray, Morris Wolin, New York City, for appellant ; Fulbright, Crooker, Freeman, Bates & Jaworski, Houston, Tex., Nall, Miller, Cadenhead & Dennis, Atlanta, Ga., of counsel.
Wade C. Hoyt, Jr., of Rogers, Magru-der & Hoyt, Rome, Ga., B.oehl, Stopher, Graves & Deindoerfer, A. J. Deindoer-fer, Louisville, Ky., for Cox.
James I. Parker, Cedartown, Ga., Harold L. Murphy, Tallapoosa, Ga., for Crowe; Howe & Murphy, Tallapoosa, Ga., of counsel.
Before WISDOM and DYER, Circuit Judges, and KRENTZMAN, District Judge.

Opinion:
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
PER CURIAM:
The Petition for Rehearing is denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is denied, 5 Cir., 430 F.2d 1365.