Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, and Ned L. Polk, Sr., Bondsman as to Mary Virginia Merritt; Crystal Miller Gomez, surety bondsman for Jessica Hollingsworth, Parties-in-Interest, v. Lance C. TEW, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-01-19
Citations: 673 F. App'x 338
Docket Number: No. 16-7215
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, and Ned L. Polk, Sr., Bondsman as to Mary Virginia Merritt; Crystal Miller Gomez, surety bondsman for Jessica Hollingsworth, Parties-in-Interest, v. Lance C. TEW, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 673
Pages: 338–339

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, and Ned L. Polk, Sr., Bondsman as to Mary Virginia Merritt; Crystal Miller Gomez, surety bondsman for Jessica Hollingsworth, Parties-in-Interest, v. Lance C. TEW, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-7215
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: January 17, 2017
Decided: January 19, 2017
Lance C. Tew, Appellant Pro Se. William Jacob Watkins, Jr., Office of the United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Lance C. Tew appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Tew's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, Tew has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we grant Tew's motion to proceed under the Criminal Justice Act and affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED