Case Name: Sarah F. Donley v. Erwin Ray Van Horn; and Sarah F. Donley v. Prescott West
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1922-10-16
Citations: 260 U.S. 697
Docket Number: No. 55; No. 56
Parties: Sarah F. Donley v. Erwin Ray Van Horn; and Sarah F. Donley v. Prescott West.
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 260
Pages: 697–697

Head Matter:
No. 55. No. 56.
Sarah F. Donley v. Erwin Ray Van Horn; and Sarah F. Donley v. Prescott West.
Error to the District Court of Appieal, Second Appellate District, of the State of California.
Submitted October 11, 1922.
Decided October 16, 1922.
Mr. A. Haines for plaintiff in error. Mr. Charles R. Pierce and Air. John M. Sutton for defendantsdn error;

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173, 175; Louisiana Navigation Co. v. Oyster Commission of Louisiana, 226 U. S. 99, 101; Coe v. Armour Fertilizer Works, 237 U. S. 413, 418; Bruce v. Tobin, 245 U. S. 18, 19.