Case Name: In the Matter of Carl D. Rosel, Appellant, v. Patricia Ellison et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1994-12-13
Citations: 84 N.Y.2d 976
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Carl D. Rosel, Appellant, v Patricia Ellison et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 84
Pages: 976–976

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Carl D. Rosel, Appellant, v Patricia Ellison et al., Respondents.
Submitted October 17, 1994;
decided December 13, 1994

Opinion:
On the Court's own motion, appeal transferred, without costs, to the Appellate Division, Third Department, upon the ground that a direct appeal does not lie when questions other than the constitutional validity of a statutory provision are involved (NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b] [2]; § 5 [b]; CPLR 5601 [b] [2]). Motion for poor person relief and a preference dismissed as academic.