Case Name: CHARLES M. KEENAN, Respondent on Review, v. Manfred (Fred) MAASS, Petitioner on Review
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1996-10-08
Citations: 324 Or. 230
Docket Number: CC 94-C-11097; CA A84950; SC S43465
Parties: CHARLES M. KEENAN, Respondent on Review, v. Manfred (Fred) MAASS, Petitioner on Review.
Judges: Fadeley, J., would not allow petition for review.
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 324
Pages: 230–230

Head Matter:
Submitted on petition for review filed July 24,
petition for review allowed; decision of the Court of Appeals vacated and case remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration October 8, 1996
CHARLES M. KEENAN, Respondent on Review, v. Manfred (Fred) MAASS, Petitioner on Review.
(CC 94-C-11097; CA A84950; SC S43465)
923 P2d 1200
Philip Schradle, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the petition for petitioner on review. With him on the petition were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.
No appearance contra.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in the light of Billings v. Gates, 323 Or 167, 916 P2d 291 (1996).
Fadeley, J., would not allow petition for review.