Case Name: HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Matthew CARR, et al., Defendants/Appellants
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-01-20
Citations: 959 S.W.2d 935
Docket Number: No. 72409
Parties: HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Matthew CARR, et al., Defendants/Appellants.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., P.J., and SIMON and HOFF, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 959
Pages: 935–935

Head Matter:
HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Matthew CARR, et al., Defendants/Appellants.
No. 72409.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Jan. 20, 1998.
Kathy M. Wilke, Dean R. Gallego, Wilke & Wilke, Clayton, for Defendants/Appellants.
Karen M. Speiser, Scott C. Harper, Clayton, for Plaintiff/Respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., P.J., and SIMON and HOFF, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Matthew Carr, David Carr, individually and as guardian ad litem for Matthew Carr, Marcia Carr, Jason Hart, and Patricia Hart appeal the granting of summary judgment in favor of Hartford Casualty Insurance Company (Hartford) in an action brought by Hartford for declaratory judgment. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find that no error of law appears. As an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum solely for the use of the parties involved has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.