Case Name: STATE of Florida, Plaintiff, v. Robert KANTER, Defendant
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1973-02-28
Citations: 273 So. 2d 772
Docket Number: No. 72-182
Parties: STATE of Florida, Plaintiff, v. Robert KANTER, Defendant.
Judges: REED, C. J., and WALDEN and MA-GER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 273
Pages: 772–773

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Plaintiff, v. Robert KANTER, Defendant.
No. 72-182.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb. 28, 1973.
No appearance for plaintiff.
Robert G. Ferrell, III, Public Defender, Titusville, and Joseph R. Moss, Asst. Public Defender, Cocoa, for defendant.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Upon a review of the certificate forwarded to us pursuant to Rule 4.6, F.A.R., 32 F.S.A., and an examination of the applicable authorities, we must respectfully decline to answer the question. Boyer v. City of Orlando, Fla.1970, 232 So.2d 169; First National Bank & T. Co. v. Great American Ins. Co., Fla.App.1972, 257 So.2d 73; In re Adoption of Taylor, Fla.App.1964, 166 So.2d 476; City of Hollywood v. Peck, Fla.1952, 57 So.2d 842; Laytner v. State, Fla.App.1970, 239 So.2d 857; State v. Harris, Fla.1962, 136 So.2d 633. The question presented to us is one which the trial court has the power to adjudicate and which may be reviewed on appeal; furthermore, this court's determination would not necessarily be dispositive of the case.
REED, C. J., and WALDEN and MA-GER, JJ., concur.