Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Olumuyiwa Ola OLABANJI, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-02-16
Citations: 167 F. App'x 609
Docket Number: No. 05-50015
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Olumuyiwa Ola OLABANJI, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 167
Pages: 609–611

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Olumuyiwa Ola OLABANJI, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 05-50015.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 13, 2006.
Decided Feb. 16, 2006.
Elyssa Getreu, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Cara Devito, Esq., Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.
Olumuyiwa Ola Olabanji, Los Angeles, CA, pro se.
Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Olumuyiwa Ola Olabanji appeals from the district court's second revocation of supervised release and imposition of a 15-month term of imprisonment. Counsel for Olabanji has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and a brief stating that she is unable to find any non-frivolous issues for review. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Counsel for Olabanji concedes that the appeal is moot because Olabanji has been released from custody. We agree. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 8, 118 S.Ct. 978, 140 L.Ed.2d 43 (1998); see also United States v. Tapia-Marquez, 361 F.3d 535, 538 (9th Cir.2004).
Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the appeal is DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.