Case Name: ROSY KERTESZ, APPELLANT, v. JOSEPH FELDHEIM, RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1928-10-15
Citations: 105 N.J.L. 239
Docket Number: 
Parties: ROSY KERTESZ, APPELLANT, v. JOSEPH FELDHEIM, RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 105
Pages: 239–240

Head Matter:
ROSY KERTESZ, APPELLANT, v. JOSEPH FELDHEIM, RESPONDENT.
Argued May 17, 1928
Decided October 15, 1928.
For the appellant, Isidor B. Glucksman.
For the respondent, Merman Waldman.

Opinion:
Pee Ctjbiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance- — The Chief Justice, Teenchaed, Mintukn, Black, Campbell, White, Yak Buskiek, McGlennoh, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, JJ. 11.
For dismissal — Paekee, J. 1.