Case Name: STATE OF OREQON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. FELICIA R. YARBOROUGH, aka Felicia Muffett Yarborough, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2008-11-05
Citations: 223 Or. App. 608
Docket Number: 020834537; A137021
Parties: STATE OF OREQON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. FELICIA R. YARBOROUGH, aka Felicia Muffett Yarborough, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Sercombe, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 223
Pages: 608–609

Head Matter:
Submitted September 5,
remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed November 5, 2008
STATE OF OREQON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. FELICIA R. YARBOROUGH, aka Felicia Muffett Yarborough, Defendant-Appellant.
Multnomah County Circuit Court
020834537; A137021
196 P3d 1032
Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, and Kristin Carveth, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Jonathan H. Fussner, Attorney-In-Charge, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Sercombe, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant pleaded guilty to identity theft and second-degree forgery, and the trial court imposed a presumptive sentence of 18 months' probation on both counts, categorizing defendant under grid block 2-F of the Oregon Sentencing Guidelines. Defendant later admitted violating the terms of her probation, and the trial court revoked her probation. The court then imposed a revocation sanction of 13 months' imprisonment and one year of post-prison supervision on the identity theft conviction and a concurrent jail term of six months on the forgery conviction.
On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court erred in imposing a sentence of 13 months' imprisonment for identity theft, over her objection that the maximum sentence allowable by law was six months. The state concedes that the trial court erred in that regard because grid block 2-F, under which defendant was originally sentenced, limits the available revocation sentence to a six-month prison sentence. See State v. Bolf, 217 Or App 606, 176 P3d 1287 (2008) (the grid block stated in the judgment controls the sentence that can be imposed upon revocation). We agree and accept the state's concession.
Remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.