Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Guillermo RODRIGUEZ-FLORES, also known as Memo, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-08-21
Citations: 236 F. App'x 138
Docket Number: No. 06-10181
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Guillermo RODRIGUEZ-FLORES, also known as Memo, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 236
Pages: 138–139

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Guillermo RODRIGUEZ-FLORES, also known as Memo, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-10181
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 21, 2007.
Susan B. Cowger, Tamara Lynn Reno, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Heather J. Barbieri, Plano, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Guillermo Rodriguez-Flores (Rodriguez) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Rodriguez has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel's brief, and Rodriguez's response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.