Case Name: The State, ex rel. Vitoratos, v. Whiddon, Police Chief
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1965-06-30
Citations: 3 Ohio St. 2d 52
Docket Number: No. 38266
Parties: The State, ex rel. Vitoratos, v. Whiddon, Police Chief.
Judges: Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Second Series
Volume: 3
Pages: 52–52

Head Matter:
The State, ex rel. Vitoratos, v. Whiddon, Police Chief.
[Cite as State, ex rel. Vitoratos, v. Whiddon, Police Chief, 3 Ohio St. 2d 52.]
(No. 38266
Decided June 30, 1965.)
Mr. William Vitoratos, in propria persona.
Mr. James Barbuto, director of law, and Miss Mary Cacioppo, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
If, as relator contends, respondent has property belonging to relator, relator may recover such property in an action of replevin. In the exercise of its discretion, this court will ordinarily refuse a writ of mandamus where relator has an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. State, ex rel. Libbey-Owens-Ford Glass Co., v. Industrial Commission, 162 Ohio St. 302.
Writ denied.
Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O'Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.