Case Name: Protests 363396-G, etc., of Hinrichs & Pearsall et al. (New York)
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1938-11-29
Citations: 1 Cust. Ct. 505
Docket Number: No. 39951
Parties: Protests 363396-G, etc., of Hinrichs & Pearsall et al. (New York).
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Volume: 1
Pages: 505–505

Head Matter:
No. 39951.
Protests 363396-G, etc., of Hinrichs & Pearsall et al. (New York).

Opinion:
Opinion by
Dallinger, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on. the authority of United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), and Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373) the articles in question were held dutiable as household utensils at 40' percent under paragraph 339 as claimed.