Case Name: E.H. DEVELOPMENT, INC., Edilberto Hernandez and Olga Hernandez, Appellants, v. KELLY TRACTOR COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1986-11-26
Citations: 501 So. 2d 1301
Docket Number: No. 4-86-0985
Parties: E.H. DEVELOPMENT, INC., Edilberto Hernandez and Olga Hernandez, Appellants, v. KELLY TRACTOR COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Appellee.
Judges: GLICKSTEIN, DELL and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 501
Pages: 1301–1301

Head Matter:
E.H. DEVELOPMENT, INC., Edilberto Hernandez and Olga Hernandez, Appellants, v. KELLY TRACTOR COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Appellee.
No. 4-86-0985.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Nov. 26, 1986.
On motion for clarification Jan. 28, 1987.
Jose M. Sosa of Law Offices of Jose M. Sosa, West Palm Beach, for appellants.
William H. Benson of Benson, Stalions & Moyle, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
GLICKSTEIN, DELL and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.
ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION
PER CURIAM.
We hereby grant appellants' motion for rehearing and treat it as a motion for clarification.
Appellants have been unable to furnish this court with a transcript of the evidence presented at the final hearing or a reconstructed statement thereof pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b)(3) which is essential to a proper appellate consideration of the final judgment. Accordingly, we are compelled to affirm the final judgment. Gardner v. Gardner, 501 So.2d 1300 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986).
GLICKSTEIN, DELL and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.