Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Victor GUTIERREZ-PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-03-10
Citations: 269 F. App'x 645
Docket Number: No. 06-50704
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Victor GUTIERREZ-PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 269
Pages: 645–645

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Victor GUTIERREZ-PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-50704.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 26, 2008.
Filed March 10, 2008.
Carol A. Trujillo, AUS, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Steven S. Lubliner, Esq., Law Offices of Steven S. Lubliner, Petaluma, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: BEEZER, FERNANDEZ, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Victor Gutierrez-Perez appeals from the 63-month sentence imposed following his bench-trial conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Gutierrez-Perez contends that the district court improperly applied a sixteen-level upward adjustment based on a prior Oregon felony conviction because he was denied a counseled hearing in Oregon court to determine whether his case should be transferred to the adult system. This contention fails because Gutierrez-Perez is not entitled to collaterally attack his prior conviction. See United States v. Gutierrez-Cervantez, 132 F.3d 460, 462 (9th Cir. 1997).
Gutierrez-Perez also contends that his sentence is unreasonable. We conclude that Gutierrez-Perez's sentence is reasonable. See Gall v. United States, — U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 586, 597-98, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.