Case Name: Sonia VILLORIN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-03-12
Citations: 578 So. 2d 738
Docket Number: No. 90-619
Parties: Sonia VILLORIN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, FERGUSON and GODERICH, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 578
Pages: 738–739

Head Matter:
Sonia VILLORIN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 90-619.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 12, 1991.
Rehearing Denied April 22, 1991.
Robert Alan Rosenblatt and Cynthia A. Greenfield, Miami, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Roberta Mandel and Anita Gay, Asst. At-tys. Gen., for appellee.
Before BARKDULL, FERGUSON and GODERICH, JJ.

Opinion:
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
PER CURIAM.
This appeal is brought from a conviction and thirty-year sentence for trafficking in cocaine. The appellant's first of three contentions on appeal is that a prospective juror should have been dismissed for cause where a reasonable doubt existed as to her impartiality.
At trial, appellant exhausted her final peremptory challenge in removing a potential juror after that juror, the stepmother of two police-officer sons, expressed doubt as to her ability to be impartial in weighing the testimony of police officers. Although appellant asked for and was denied addi tional peremptory challenges, she made no further contentions that the panel ultimately chosen included an objectionable juror.
We affirm on the authority of Trotter v. State, [576 So.2d 691] (Fla.1990) (to show reversible error, a party must show that all peremptories had been exhausted and that an objectionable juror had to be accepted). We find no merit in appellant's two remaining points on appeal.
Affirmed.