Case Name: Craig FOSTER, Employee/Appellant, v. DIP CLEAN BUSINESS, INC., Employer/Respondent, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-09-17
Citations: 85 S.W.3d 699
Docket Number: No. ED 80561
Parties: Craig FOSTER, Employee/Appellant, v. DIP CLEAN BUSINESS, INC., Employer/Respondent, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., and MARY K. HOFF and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 85
Pages: 699–700

Head Matter:
Craig FOSTER, Employee/Appellant, v. DIP CLEAN BUSINESS, INC., Employer/Respondent, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent.
No. ED 80561.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Sept. 17, 2002.
Craig Foster, St. Louis, pro se.
Dip Clean Business, Inc., Florissant, pro se.
Larry R. Ruhmann, St. Louis, for respondent Division.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., and MARY K. HOFF and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Craig Foster appeals from the order of the Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the decision of the Appeals Tribunal of the Division of Employment Security denying his claim for unemployment benefits. Foster contends the Commission erred in affirming the decision of the Appeals Tribunal because he did not voluntarily leave his employment at Dip Clean Business, Inc.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b). Dip Clean's motion to strike Foster's brief taken with the case is denied.