Case Name: Undra SUMLIN v. STATE of Arkansas
Court: Arkansas Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Arkansas
Decision Date: 1994-09-26
Citations: 318 Ark. 105
Docket Number: CR 94-362
Parties: Undra SUMLIN v. STATE of Arkansas
Judges: 
Reporter: Arkansas Reports
Volume: 318
Pages: 105–106

Head Matter:
Undra SUMLIN v. STATE of Arkansas
CR 94-362
883 S.W.2d 480
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Opinion delivered September 26, 1994
Matthew J. Ketcham, for appellant.
No response.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Undra Sumlin, by his attorney, Matthew J. Ketcham, has filed a motion to file a belated record. We treat this as a motion for belated appeal.
His attorney, Matthew J. Ketcham, admits by motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part in calculating the forty-five days for filing the record pursuant to our per curiam of July 11, 1994.
We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam). The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.