Case Name: Stanley J. WRIGHT, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2014-04-08
Citations: 427 S.W.3d 888
Docket Number: No. ED 99362
Parties: Stanley J. WRIGHT, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., KURT S. ODENWALD, J., and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 427
Pages: 888–889

Head Matter:
Stanley J. WRIGHT, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 99362.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
April 8, 2014.
Edward Scott Thompson, Missouri Public Defender Office, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Chris Roster, Attorney General, Gabriel Etter Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., KURT S. ODENWALD, J., and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Stanley J. Wright appeals from the motion court's "Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Judgment" denying his Rule 24.035, "Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence," alleging ineffective assistance of plea counsel. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).