Case Name: David ROBERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2015-09-01
Citations: 471 S.W.3d 379
Docket Number: WD 77559
Parties: David ROBERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Division Two: Thomas H. Newton, Presiding Judge, Victor C. Howard, Judge and Mark D. Pfeiffer, Judge
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 471
Pages: 379–380

Head Matter:
David ROBERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
WD 77559
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Order filed: September 1, 2015
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied September 29, 2015
David E. Roberson, Pro-se, for Appellant.
Adam S. Rowley, for Respondent
Before Division Two: Thomas H. Newton, Presiding Judge, Victor C. Howard, Judge and Mark D. Pfeiffer, Judge

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
David Roberson appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. In his four points on appeal, Roberson claims that plea counsel was ineffective for failing to disclose that he would have to register as a sex offender every ninety days if he pleaded guilty and for "failing to investigate the direct consequences of his client pleading guilty; that counsel for probation revocation and sentencing was ineffective for failing to submit evidence that Roberson did not violate the terms or conditions of his probation and for failing to investigate alternatives to incarceration; and that the court erred in failing to provide a written summary of the evidence it relied on to determine that he violated the terms of his probation and to consider alternatives to incarceration. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).