Case Name: HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY OF the MIDWEST, Appellant, v. Leon VINCENT and Mae Vincent, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-02-28
Citations: 752 So. 2d 95
Docket Number: No. 1D98-1821
Parties: HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY OF the MIDWEST, Appellant, v. Leon VINCENT and Mae Vincent, Appellees.
Judges: DAVIS, BENTON, and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 752
Pages: 95–95

Head Matter:
HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY OF the MIDWEST, Appellant, v. Leon VINCENT and Mae Vincent, Appellees.
No. 1D98-1821.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Feb. 28, 2000.
Debra B. Potter, lia J. Klion, and James E. Tribble of Hicks & Anderson, P.A., Miami, for Appellant.
Stephen H. Echsner of Levin, Middle-brooks, Thomas, Mitchell, Green, Echsner, Proctor & Papantonio, P.A., Pensacola, and Louis K. Rosenbloum of Louis K. Ro-senbloum, P.A., Pensacola, for Appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Young v. Progressive Southeastern Ins. Co., 753 So.2d 80, 87 (Fla.2000) ("[A] self-insured motorist exclusion is contrary to the statutory scheme set forth in the uninsured motorist statute, and . the provision in the . uninsured motorist policy refusing to treat a self-insured motorist as either an underinsured or uninsured motorist is void.").
DAVIS, BENTON, and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.