Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lino H. HAYNES, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-03-20
Citations: 476 F. App'x 538
Docket Number: No. 11-7725
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lino H. HAYNES, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 476
Pages: 538–538

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lino H. HAYNES, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-7725.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 15, 2012.
Decided: March 20, 2012.
Lino H. Haynes, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia; Neil H. MacBride, United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Lino H. Haynes appeals the district court's order denying his motion for correction of judgment under Fed.R.Crim.P. 36. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Haynes, No. 2:90-cr-00105-HCM-TEM-1 (E.D.Va. Nov. 23, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.