Case Name: Daniel MASDEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of NEVADA; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-06-12
Citations: 36 F. App'x 609
Docket Number: No. 01-16873; D.C. No. CV-98-00227-DWH
Parties: Daniel MASDEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of NEVADA; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 36
Pages: 609–609

Head Matter:
Daniel MASDEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of NEVADA; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 01-16873.
D.C. No. CV-98-00227-DWH.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 10, 2002.
Decided June 12, 2002.
Before O’SCANNLAIN, BERZON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Daniel Masden appeals pro se the district court's order denying his motion for relief from the judgment dismissing his action with prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we vacate and remand to the district court for reconsideration in light of our recent decision Community Dental Services v. Tani, 282 F.3d 1164 (9th Cir.2002).
Each party shall bear its own costs on appeal.
VACATED AND REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.