Case Name: IN the INTEREST OF: T.O.C., Appellant, v. JUVENILE OFFICER, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2018-05-29
Citations: 548 S.W.3d 455
Docket Number: WD 80761
Parties: IN the INTEREST OF: T.O.C., Appellant,
v.
JUVENILE OFFICER, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 548
Pages: 455–455

Head Matter:
IN the INTEREST OF: T.O.C., Appellant,
v.
JUVENILE OFFICER, Respondent.
WD 80761
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
ORDER FILED: May 29, 2018
Craig A. Johnston, Assistant State Public Defender, Columbia, MO, Attorney for Appellant.
Lori Fluegel, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Respondent.
Before Division IV: Mark D. Pfeiffer, Chief Judge, and Gary D. Witt and Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judges
Order

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
T.O.C., a juvenile, appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, Family Court Division, sustaining the allegations of the First Amended Petition of the Juvenile Officer of Jackson County, Missouri, that T.O.C. committed what would have been, if tried as an adult, the offenses of assault of a law enforcement officer in the first degree, § 565.081 (Count 1), and property damage in the second degree, § 569.120 (Count 2), finding the court had jurisdiction over T.O.C., and ordering T.O.C. to be committed to the custody of the Division of Youth Services ("DYS"). Finding no error, the judgment is affirmed. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).