Case Name: RALEY'S, INC., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, and Retail Clerks Union Locals 373, 588 and 1179, United Food & Commercial Workers, AFL-CIO and Independent Drug Clerks Association, Intervenors
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1984-03-22
Citations: 728 F.2d 1274
Docket Number: Nos. 81-7471, 81-7592
Parties: RALEY’S, INC., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, and Retail Clerks Union Locals 373, 588 and 1179, United Food & Commercial Workers, AFL-CIO and Independent Drug Clerks Association, Intervenors.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 728
Pages: 1274–1274

Head Matter:
RALEY’S, INC., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, and Retail Clerks Union Locals 373, 588 and 1179, United Food & Commercial Workers, AFL-CIO and Independent Drug Clerks Association, Intervenors.
Nos. 81-7471, 81-7592.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
March 22, 1984.
Henry R. Telfeian, McLaughlin & Irvin, Norman Leonard, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner.
David R. Marshall, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Before KENNEDY, ALARCON and NELSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Pursuant to the decision filed by the en banc court in this case on February 13, 1984, 725 F.2d 1204, the opinion previously filed by the above panel on April 7, 1983 is hereby modified. Since the en banc court overruled Anja Engineering Corp. v. NLRB, 685 F.2d 292 (9th Cir.1982), our previous order, see 703 F.2d 410 (9th Cir. 1983) to remand for consideration whether to order a new election is withdrawn, as no remand is necessary.
We reverse the unfair labor practice findings on the Board's third charge, and affirm the unfair labor practice findings on the first, second and fourth charges.
ENFORCEMENT GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.