Case Name: Bartlett v. McNeil
Court: New York Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1875-01
Citations: 5 Thomp. & Cook 675
Docket Number: 
Parties: Bartlett v. McNeil.
Judges: 
Reporter: Thompson & Cook's Supreme Court Reports
Volume: 5
Pages: 675–675

Head Matter:
Bartlett v. McNeil.
Bupp~ementa~ry proeeeth,n93.
Supplementary proceedings (Code, § 293) are not authorized in a judgment not in personam.
Appeal by plaintiff, Charles W. Bartlett, from an order at the special term, allowing an amendment to the judgment-roll; also from an order denying a motion that the court fix a time for defendant, Alexander McNeil, to appear and be examined in supplementary proceedings.
John H. Bergen, for appellant.
Beebe, Wilcox & Hobbs, for respondent.

Opinion:
Davis, P. J.
The onfy point of interest passed upon is fully set forth in the head-note.
Orders affirmed.