Case Name: Thomas P. Wallace, as Surviving Partner, etc., Appellant, v. Herman Kaempf, Respondent
Court: New York City Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1894
Citations: 10 Misc. 792
Docket Number: 
Parties: Thomas P. Wallace, as Surviving Partner, etc., Appellant, v. Herman Kaempf, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 10
Pages: 792–792

Head Matter:
Thomas P. Wallace, as Surviving Partner, etc., Appellant, v. Herman Kaempf, Respondent.
Appeal from judgment dismissing complaint.
George W. Wallace, for appellant.
Hahn, Myers & Bronner, for respondent.

Opinion:
Fitzsimons, J.
The complaint was rightfully dismissed.
There is nothing in the evidence submitted showing that plaintiffs parted with any security or claim which they held against Bartz in consideration of the note in suit, or that they even extended the term of credit; in fact, it seems that they parted with nothing of value, therefore, the note sued upon is void for the want of consideration.
The judgment must,.therefore, be affirmed, with costs.
Van Wyck, J., concurs.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.