Case Name: RALLI et al., Respondents, v. HILLYER, Appellant
Court: New York City Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1895-10
Citations: 40 N.Y.S. 1148
Docket Number: 
Parties: RALLI et al., Respondents, v. HILLYER, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 40
Pages: 1148–1148

Head Matter:
(15 Misc. Rep. 692)
RALLI et al., Respondents, v. HILLYER, Appellant.
(City Court of New York, General Term.
October, 1895.)
Action by Pandia C. Ralli and others against George R. Hillyer.
William C. Beecher, for appellant.
Charles Wehle, for respondents.

Opinion:
CONLAN, J.
Appeal from a judgment sustaining a demurrer. The case of Knorr v. Bates (Com. Pl.) 33 N. Y. Supp. 691, is an authority on the question presented by the demurrer, and binding upon this court, notwithstanding the more liberal view taken by Judge Ingraham in Leitner v. Beecher (Sup.) 37 N. Y. Supp. 1114. Demurrer sustained, with costs. Order affirmed, with costs. FITZSIMONS, J., concurs.