Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio SANCHEZ-ANDRADE, aka Juan Ramon Garcia, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-06-10
Citations: 134 F. App'x 156
Docket Number: No. 04-50180
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Antonio SANCHEZ-ANDRADE, aka Juan Ramon Garcia, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: LEAVY, FISHER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 134
Pages: 156–157

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Antonio SANCHEZ-ANDRADE, aka Juan Ramon Garcia, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 04-50180.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 2, 2005.
Decided June 10, 2005.
Kevin Lally, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Jerry Sies, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: LEAVY, FISHER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
The district court did not err by denying Appellant's motion to suppress. California law did not require the officers to issue a citation for the vehicle code violation giving rise to the inventory search of Appellant's vehicle. See People v. Burch, 188 Cal.App.3d 172, 232 Cal.Rptr. 502 (1986). The failure of police to cite Appellant for driving without a license does not render the evidence subject to suppression in this case. Accordingly, Sanchez-Adrade's conviction is AFFIRMED.
Because Sanchez-Andrade did not challenge his sentence on Sixth Amendment grounds in the district court, we grant a limited remand pursuant to United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, —-— (9th Cir.2005) (en banc).
AFFIRMED in part; REMANDED in part.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.