Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John A. McKNIGHT, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-09-14
Citations: 201 F. App'x 538
Docket Number: No. 06-30244
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. John A. McKNIGHT, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: PREGERSON, T.G. NELSON, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 201
Pages: 538–539

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. John A. McKNIGHT, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 06-30244.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 11, 2006.
Filed Sept. 14, 2006.
Joshua A. Van De Wetering, Esq., Missoula, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
John P. Rhodes, Esq., Missoula, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: PREGERSON, T.G. NELSON, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
John McKnight appeals the sentence imposed following the revocation of his supervised release. He contends that the district court violated his Sixth Amendment rights in imposing a prison term on the basis of facts neither admitted nor proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. As McKnight concedes, this contention is foreclosed by United States v. Huerta-Pimental, 445 F.3d 1220 (9th Cir. 2006). We therefore affirm his sentence.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.