Case Name: Nivardo Leon NUNEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2010-02-19
Citations: 28 So. 3d 952
Docket Number: No. 5D09-834
Parties: Nivardo Leon NUNEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: MONACO, C.J., GRIFFIN and PALMER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 28
Pages: 952–952

Head Matter:
Nivardo Leon NUNEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D09-834.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Feb. 19, 2010.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Robert Wildridge, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Nivardo L. Nunez, Perry, pro se.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Roark Wall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Ap-pellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the appellant's judgment and sentence. The prosecutor's isolated statement concerning the law, which was arguably a misstatement, followed by the trial court's proper instructions to the jury with respect to the law does not constitute grounds for reversal. See Lugo v. State, 845 So.2d 74, 108-109 (Fla.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 920, 124 S.Ct. 320, 157 L.Ed.2d 216 (2003); Cabrera v. State, 490 So.2d 200 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); see also Fennie v. State, 855 So.2d 597, 609 (Fla.2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 975, 124 S.Ct. 1877, 158 L.Ed.2d 471 (2004).
AFFIRMED.
MONACO, C.J., GRIFFIN and PALMER, JJ., concur.