Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Troy PELTS, a/k/a James Lee Start, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-08-03
Citations: 441 F. App'x 988
Docket Number: No. 10-6402
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Troy PELTS, a/k/a James Lee Start, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 441
Pages: 988–989

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Troy PELTS, a/k/a James Lee Start, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-6402.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 21, 2011.
Decided: Aug. 3, 2011.
Troy Pelts, Appellant Pro Se. L. Patrick Auld, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Troy Pelts appeals the district court's orders denying his motion filed under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) for reduction of sentence and denying his motion for an extension of time to file an appeal. We have reviewed the record and Pelts's contentions regarding his § 3582(c)(2) motion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United, States v. Pelts, No. 6:92-cr-00305-JAB-1 (M.D.N.C. July 13, 2009). Because we have reviewed Pelts's challenge to the denial of a sentence reduction on the merits, we find his appeal of the denial of the motion for an extension to be moot. United States v. Pelts, No. 6:92-cr-00305-JAB-1 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 8, 2010). Finally, we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.