Case Name: Nakavius L. PAUL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2014-04-16
Citations: 138 So. 3d 487
Docket Number: No. 3D12-406
Parties: Nakavius L. PAUL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SUAREZ, LAGOA, and LOGUE, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 138
Pages: 487–488

Head Matter:
Nakavius L. PAUL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D12-406.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 16, 2014.
Rehearing Denied May 15, 2014.
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and David S. Molansky, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Linda Katz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SUAREZ, LAGOA, and LOGUE, JJ.

Opinion:
SUAREZ, J.
Defendant Nakavius Paul appeals his conviction and sentence. We affirm finding that there is no merit to the first issue raised on appeal and as to the second issue we find that none of the unobjected-to comments made in closing argument by the prosecution rise to the level of fundamental error. Merck v. State, 975 So.2d 1054, 1061 (Fla.2007) ("Unobjected-to comments are grounds for reversal only if they rise to the level of fundamental error.").
Affirmed.