Case Name: Schafran & Finkel, Inc., Appellant, v. M. Lowenstein & Sons, Inc., Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1939-04-11
Citations: 280 N.Y. 687
Docket Number: 
Parties: Schafran & Finkel, Inc., Appellant, v. M. Lowenstein & Sons, Inc., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 280
Pages: 687–687

Head Matter:
Schafran & Finkel, Inc., Appellant, v. M. Lowenstein & Sons, Inc., Respondent.
Submitted April 3, 1939;
decided April 11, 1939.

Opinion:
Motion for reargument denied with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. There is no stay preventing defendant from < proceeding according to the provisions of the Arbitration Law. Neither is there any intimation in the opinion that there was, or was not, a contract. We were dealing simply with the pleadings as they were. (See 280 N. Y. 164.)