Case Name: STATE on the relation of SARAH TIDLINE v. WILLIS HICKERSON
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 1875-01
Citations: 72 N.C. 421
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE on the relation of SARAH TIDLINE v. WILLIS HICKERSON.
Judges: 
Reporter: North Carolina Reports
Volume: 72
Pages: 421–422

Head Matter:
STATE on the relation of SARAH TIDLINE v. WILLIS HICKERSON.
Depositions are admissible in evidence on the trial of an issue in Bas-ardy, as they are in other civil cases.
(.Pate’s case, Busb. 244; State v. McIntosh, 64 N. 0. Rep. 607, cited and approved.)
Proceeding- in Bastardy, tried at Pall Term, 1874, of Wilkes Superior Court, before his Honor, Mitchell, J.
On the trial of an issue as to the paternity of the child, the defendant offered in evidence the deposition of a witness who was too sick to attend the Court. The reading of the deposition was objected to by the Solicitor, which objection was sustained by the Court.
There was a verdict against the defendant. Judgment and appeal.
Scott c§ Caldwell, for defendant.
Attorney General Hargrove, for the State.

Opinion:
Rodman, J.
"We are not informed by the record for what reason his Honor rejected the deposition offered in evidence by the defendant. It is said here it was because he considered the proceeding a criminal one, in which depositions are not admitted. That a proceeding in bastardy in a civil action is settled by the cases of State v. Pate, 1 Busb. 244, and State v. McIntosh, 64 N. C., 607. The deposition was admissible.
Pee CuRIAm. Judgment below reversed and venire de novo. Let this opinion be certified.