Case Name: Brian Keith NESBITT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tim RILEY, Warden; Bryan P. Stirling, Director of the Department of Corrections; Amy Spencer; Dr. J.R. Bearden; DHO Richard Turner; Laura CAldwell; Lt. Lawson, Safety; Admin Captain Nance; Gary Lane; Investigator Lane; Karen McMorris; Cap. Jennette Glen; Lt. Jason Webber; Major James Parris; Captain Cathy Duncan; Dr. T. Byrne, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-10-19
Citations: 619 F. App'x 259
Docket Number: No. 15-6835
Parties: Brian Keith NESBITT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tim RILEY, Warden; Bryan P. Stirling, Director of the Department of Corrections; Amy Spencer; Dr. J.R. Bearden; DHO Richard Turner; Laura CAldwell; Lt. Lawson, Safety; Admin Captain Nance; Gary Lane; Investigator Lane; Karen McMorris; Cap. Jennette Glen; Lt. Jason Webber; Major James Parris; Captain Cathy Duncan; Dr. T. Byrne, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 619
Pages: 259–259

Head Matter:
Brian Keith NESBITT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tim RILEY, Warden; Bryan P. Stirling, Director of the Department of Corrections; Amy Spencer; Dr. J.R. Bearden; DHO Richard Turner; Laura CAldwell; Lt. Lawson, Safety; Admin Captain Nance; Gary Lane; Investigator Lane; Karen McMorris; Cap. Jennette Glen; Lt. Jason Webber; Major James Parris; Captain Cathy Duncan; Dr. T. Byrne, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15-6835.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 15, 2015.
Decided: Oct. 19, 2015.
Brian Keith Nesbitt, Appellant Pro Se. James E. Parham, Jr., Irm'o, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Brian Keith Nesbitt appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying Nesbitt's motions for a preliminary injunction and a temporary restraining order in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Nesbitt v. Riley, No. 0:14-cv-02788-RMG-PJG (D.S.C. filed May 1, 2015 & entered May 4, 2015). We deny Nesbitt's motions for appointment of counsel, a preliminary injunction, and a temporary restraining order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.