Case Name: Vanita FRAZIER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2006-12-01
Citations: 943 So. 2d 917
Docket Number: No. 1D06-3647
Parties: Vanita FRAZIER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: BARFIELD, WEBSTER, and POLSTON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 943
Pages: 917–917

Head Matter:
Vanita FRAZIER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 1D06-3647.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Dec. 1, 2006.
Vanita Frazier, pro se, Petitioner.
Charlie Crist, Attorney General; Felicia A. Wilcox and Betty Cheramie, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In light of the circuit court's order directing the State Attorney to file a response, we find that the granting of mandamus relief to compel a ruling on petitioner's pending motion for postcon-viction relief is not warranted. See Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm'n, 807 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). Therefore, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus but we strongly encourage the circuit court to promptly rule on petitioner's motion for postconviction relief. See Wiley v. State, 919 So.2d 618 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).
BARFIELD, WEBSTER, and POLSTON, JJ., concur.