Case Name: Charlotte A. LOVE, Relator, v. ALLINA HEALTH SYSTEM, Self-insured/Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc., Respondent, and Life Insurance Company of North America, Health Partners, Allina Health System, Twin Cities Orthopedics, Minnesota Department of Human Services, and Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development, Intervenors
Court: Minnesota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Minnesota
Decision Date: 2010-12-30
Citations: 792 N.W.2d 815
Docket Number: No. A10-1675
Parties: Charlotte A. LOVE, Relator, v. ALLINA HEALTH SYSTEM, Self-insured/Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc., Respondent, and Life Insurance Company of North America, Health Partners, Allina Health System, Twin Cities Orthopedics, Minnesota Department of Human Services, and Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development, Intervenors.
Judges: 
Reporter: North Western Reporter 2d
Volume: 792
Pages: 815–815

Head Matter:
Charlotte A. LOVE, Relator, v. ALLINA HEALTH SYSTEM, Self-insured/Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc., Respondent, and Life Insurance Company of North America, Health Partners, Allina Health System, Twin Cities Orthopedics, Minnesota Department of Human Services, and Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development, Intervenors.
No. A10-1675.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
Dec. 30, 2010.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 26, 2011.
Charlotte A. Love, pro se.
Paula Penny Helgren, Brown & Carlson, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota, for respondents.

Opinion:
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed September 1, 2010, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that "[s]ummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view," doing no more than establishing the law of the case).
BY THE COURT:
/s/Christopher J. Dietzen Associate Justice