Case Name: Vincent FILMORE, Appellant, v. The HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1988-08-09
Citations: 529 So. 2d 798
Docket Number: No. 87-1821
Parties: Vincent FILMORE, Appellant, v. The HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.
Judges: Before NESBITT, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 529
Pages: 798–799

Head Matter:
Vincent FILMORE, Appellant, v. The HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.
No. 87-1821.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Aug. 9, 1988.
Rehearing Denied Aug. 31, 1988.
Hershoff & Levy and Jay Levy, Bloom & Feola, Miami, for appellant.
Highsmith, Strauss & Glatzer and Philip Glatzer, Miami, for appellee.
Before NESBITT, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the judgment entered in favor of the insurer wherein the trial court correctly recognized that the insurer was not required to provide the appellant with uninsured motorist coverage because the appellant was not a class one insured, nor was he a class two insured entitled to coverage under the Mullís rule. Mullis v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 252 So.2d 229, 233, 238 (Fla.1971); Travelers Ins. Co. v. Spencer, 397 So.2d 358, 360 (Fla.1st DCA 1981); France v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 380 So.2d 1155, 1156 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).
Affirmed.