Case Name: Forrest DESMIT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DALLAS FORT WORTH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOARD, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-04-25
Citations: 470 F. App'x 277
Docket Number: No. 11-11137
Parties: Forrest DESMIT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DALLAS FORT WORTH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOARD, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 470
Pages: 277–278

Head Matter:
Forrest DESMIT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DALLAS FORT WORTH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOARD, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 11-11137
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 25, 2012.
Forrest Desmit, Watauga, TX, pro se.
William Wayne Krueger, III, Esq., Kevin Michael Curley, Esq., McKamie Krueger, L.L.P., Richardson, TX, for DefendantAppellee.
Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Forrest DeSmit sued his employer under various theories that generally alleged employment discrimination. In a thorough and careful memorandum opinion, the district court dismissed all claims as lacking merit.
DeSmit, pro $e as in the district court, appeals but does not explain how, in his view, the district court erred. The failure to brief is fatal to any claim.
"Because [the plaintiff] has failed to brief any issue, his appeal is frivolous and is dismissed. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2." Hawkins v. Woods, 463 Fed.Appx. 337, 338 (5th Cir.2012) (per curiam).
This appeal, likewise, is frivolous and subject to dismissal under Rule 42.2. Even if we were to consider the correctness of the judgment, we would affirm on the basis of the district court's convincing discussion of the issues raised in that court.
The appeal is DISMISSED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.