Case Name: John Lee BAIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-11-15
Citations: 830 So. 2d 894
Docket Number: No. 2D02-2516
Parties: John Lee BAIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: GREEN and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 830
Pages: 894–894

Head Matter:
John Lee BAIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D02-2516.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Nov. 15, 2002.

Opinion:
SILBERMAN, Judge.
John Bain challenges the trial court's order summarily denying his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm. In his motion, Bain alleged that his plea was involuntary because defense counsel affirmatively mi-sadvised him that these convictions could not be used in the future as prior offenses for sentencing purposes. In Stansel v. State, 825 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), we held that this claim is not cognizable in a rule 3.850 motion. We certify the same question that we certified in Stansel.
Affirmed.
GREEN and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.