Case Name: Edward Lynn ODOM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2001-04-05
Citations: 782 So. 2d 510
Docket Number: No. 1D00-2007
Parties: Edward Lynn ODOM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: BENTON and POLSTON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 782
Pages: 510–513

Head Matter:
Edward Lynn ODOM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D00-2007.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
April 5, 2001.
Appellant, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
After concluding that two of appellant's claims are facially sufficient, we reverse and remand this case for the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing or attach portions of the record conclusively refuting the claims that defense counsel was ineffective for failing to inform him of the voluntary intoxication defense and neglect ing to interview two witnesses who could have supported that defense. See Hester v. State, 732 So.2d 331 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Richardson v. State, 723 So.2d 910 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.
BENTON and POLSTON, JJ., concur.
PADOVANO, J., concurs with opinion.