Case Name: Malou Mananghaya et al., Plaintiffs, v. Bronx-Lebanon Hospital et al., Defendants; Napoli Transportation, Inc., Doing Business as C&L Towing Services, Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Aggreko, LLC, Third-Party Defendant/Second Third-Party Defendant-Appellant. Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Center, Second Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2016-02-25
Citations: 136 A.D.3d 598
Docket Number: 
Parties: Malou Mananghaya et al., Plaintiffs, v Bronx-Lebanon Hospital et al., Defendants. Napoli Transportation, Inc., Doing Business as C&L Towing Services, Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff, v Aggreko, LLC, Third-Party Defendant/Second Third-Party Defendant-Appellant. Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Center, Second Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent.
Judges: Concur — Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Saxe and Gische, JJ.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 136
Pages: 598–598

Head Matter:
Malou Mananghaya et al., Plaintiffs, v Bronx-Lebanon Hospital et al., Defendants. Napoli Transportation, Inc., Doing Business as C&L Towing Services, Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff, v Aggreko, LLC, Third-Party Defendant/Second Third-Party Defendant-Appellant. Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Center, Second Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent.
[25 NYS3d 600]-

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lucindo Suarez, J.), entered January 9, 2014, which denied second third-party defendant's (Aggreko) motion to dismiss the second third-party complaint, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1), (7) and (8), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The motion court correctly determined that the documentary evidence tendered by Aggreko — rental agreement terms and conditions unsigned by third-party plaintiff (the hospital) — did not conclusively establish a defense to the second third-party complaint as a matter of law (see Goshen v Mutual Life Ins. Co. of N.Y., 98 NY2d 314, 326 [2002]).
Nor does Aggreko and the hospital's course of conduct manifest that the hospital accepted the rental agreement terms and conditions (see Brown Bros. Elec. Contrs. v Beam Constr. Corp., 41 NY2d 397, 399-400 [1977]).
We have considered Aggreko's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.
Concur — Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Saxe and Gische, JJ.