Case Name: Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., Respondent-Appellant, v. Peter Fritz, Individually and as Agent for Warren Holding Co., et al., Appellants-Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1982-12-08
Citations: 58 N.Y.2d 729
Docket Number: 
Parties: Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., Respondent-Appellant, v Peter Fritz, Individually and as Agent for Warren Holding Co., et al., Appellants-Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 58
Pages: 729–729

Head Matter:
Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., Respondent-Appellant, v Peter Fritz, Individually and as Agent for Warren Holding Co., et al., Appellants-Respondents.
Submitted November 1, 1982;
decided December 8, 1982

Opinion:
Motion by the Fritz defendants and by defendant Warren Holding Co. for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion by defendant Karbiner for leave to appeal dismissed for untimeliness.