Case Name: Cynthia T. ADAMS, Appellant, v. GENERAL MOTORS, et. al., Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-10-10
Citations: 28 S.W.3d 473
Docket Number: No. 77433
Parties: Cynthia T. ADAMS, Appellant, v. GENERAL MOTORS, et. al., Respondents.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, Jr., J., and JAMES R. DOWD, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 28
Pages: 473–473

Head Matter:
Cynthia T. ADAMS, Appellant, v. GENERAL MOTORS, et. al., Respondents.
No. 77433.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Oct. 10, 2000.
Frank J. Niesen, Jr., St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Donna M. Anderson, Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Louis, for respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, Jr., J., and JAMES R. DOWD, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Cynthia Adams appeals the Labor & Industrial Relations Commission award denying Adams benefits because she failed to prove that injuries she allegedly sustained as a result of a "peeping tom" incident she claims caused her to become totally disabled arose out of and in the course of her employment. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we have considered the points made during oral argument. We find no error of law and the order of the Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. We have, however, furnished the parties with a memorandum setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The award is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).