Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Coy D. CONAWAY, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2015-05-26
Citations: 462 S.W.3d 472
Docket Number: No. ED 101466
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Coy D. CONAWAY, Appellant.
Judges: Before Patricia L. Cohen, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Robert M. Clayton III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 462
Pages: 472–473

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Coy D. CONAWAY, Appellant.
No. ED 101466
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
FILED: May 26, 2015
Margaret M. Johnston, Assistant Public Defender, Woodrail Centre, 1000 W. Ni-fong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203, for appellant.
Daniel N. McPherson, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.
Before Patricia L. Cohen, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Robert M. Clayton III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Coy Conaway (Defendant) appeals from the judgment of conviction entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County after a jury found him guilty of robbery in the first degree and armed criminal action. Defendant claims that the trial court erred in allowing the prosecutor to improperly personalize closing argument.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not err. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).