Case Name: Andrews & Keenan v. Dan'l Thomas
Court: South Carolina Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: South Carolina
Decision Date: 1833-05
Citations: 1 Hill 278
Docket Number: 
Parties: Andrews & Keenan v. Dan’l Thomas.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Carolina Law Reports
Volume: 19
Pages: 278–278

Head Matter:
Andrews & Keenan v. Dan’l Thomas.

Opinion:
Under the Acts of 1787, P. L. 435, and 1799, 2 Faust, 323, authorizing the examination of witnesses who reside out of the State, notice of the application for that purpose, must, if required, be served on the party himself; service on the attorney, is not sufficient—Bartoline v. Heartle, 2 Bailey, 196.