Case Name: STATE ex STIVERS v. DAWLEY
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1926-08-14
Citations: 4 Ohio Law Abs. 754
Docket Number: No. 20059
Parties: STATE ex STIVERS v. DAWLEY
Judges: 
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 4
Pages: 754–754

Head Matter:
STATE ex STIVERS v. DAWLEY
No. 20059.
Supreme Court
Dock. Aug. 14, 1926;
4 Abs. 557.
Attorneys — E. B. Stivers and Fite & Fite for State ex; Young & Barnum, and Bagby & Bagby for Dawley; all of Georgetown.

Opinion:
Stivers contends in- the Supreme Court that where a contract for highway improvement provides for alterations during the progress of the work, where the nature of the work required cannot be previously determined, and such alterations or additional work is to be done by directions of county commissioners, and they make a private contract with contractor for such additional work, they cannot do so without publication or certification of funds available.