Case Name: HARRIS et v. FIRST SPIRITUALIST CHURCH
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1927
Citations: 5 Ohio Law Abs. 761
Docket Number: 
Parties: HARRIS et v. FIRST SPIRITUALIST CHURCH
Judges: (Richards and Young, JJ., concur.)
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 5
Pages: 761–762

Head Matter:
HARRIS et v. FIRST SPIRITUALIST CHURCH
Ohio Appeals, 6th Dist., Lucas Co.
Mulholland & Hartman, Toledo for Harris.
Johnson, Johnson & Farber, Toledo, for Church.

Opinion:
WILLIAMS, J.
1. The burden is on the one challenging the legality of service of summons in error to show, by clear and convincing evidence, the incorrectness and inaccuracy of the return.
2. Evidence held not sufficiently clear and convincing as to show that summons in error was made after return day thereof, where return showed timely service.
3. In a proceeding to sell real estate of a charitable or religious society or association under Sections 10051 and 10056 GC., the final order made in the trial court is a final judgment from which error may be prosecuted.
(Richards and Young, JJ., concur.)
For reference to full opinion see Omnibus Index, last page, this issue.