Case Name: George Sing LOUIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert CARNEVALE et al., DefendantsAppellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1971-06-02
Citations: 443 F.2d 912
Docket Number: No. 26731
Parties: George Sing LOUIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert CARNEVALE et al., DefendantsAppellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 443
Pages: 912–912

Head Matter:
George Sing LOUIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert CARNEVALE et al., DefendantsAppellees.
No. 26731.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
June 2, 1971.
George Sing Louie, in pro. per. Michael J. Brady, of Ropers, Majeski, Kohn, Bentley & Wagner, Redwood City, Cal., for defendants-appellees.
Before HAMLEY, KOELSCH and TRASK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion for inspection and copying under Rule 34, Fed.R.Civ.P.
The order being interlocutory, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Alexander v. United States, 201 U.S. 117, 26 S.Ct. 356, 50 L.Ed. 686 (1906); Lampman v. United States District Court, 418 F.2d 215 (9th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 919, 90 S.Ct. 926, 25 L.Ed.2d 100 (1970).
. There is some doubt whether this appeal has been properly docketed. The ruling on this notice of appeal shall not relieve appellant of his duty to properly docket the appeal in the principal action as provided in Rule 12, Fed.R.App.P.