Case Name: Robert E. HOOPER, Appellant, v. CHRYSLER MOTORS CORPORATION, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1963-11-21
Citations: 325 F.2d 321
Docket Number: No. 20315
Parties: Robert E. HOOPER, Appellant, v. CHRYSLER MOTORS CORPORATION, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 325
Pages: 321–322

Head Matter:
Robert E. HOOPER, Appellant, v. CHRYSLER MOTORS CORPORATION, Appellee.
No. 20315.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
Nov. 21, 1963.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 9, 1964.
Albert Smith, Lubbock, Tex., for appellant.
Geo. W. McCleskey, Lubbock, Tex., Keith A. Jenkins, Detroit, Mich., David W. Kendall, Washington, D. C., and Nelson, McCleskey & Harriger, Lubbock, Tex., for appellee.
Before BROWN, WISDOM and BELL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant's case was dismissed with prejudice by the District Court when he declined to go to trial after denial of his motion for continuance. No abuse of discretion appears either with respect to the denial of the motion for continuance, or the dismissal. Rule 41(b), F.R. Civ.P.; Joseph v. Norton Co., 2 Cir., 1959, 273 F.2d 65; and Girard Trust Co. v. Amsterdam, 5 Cir., 1942, 128 F.2d 376.
It follows that the judgment appealed from must be, and is affirmed.