Case Name: Baron De Hirsch MEYER, Milton Weiss and Leo Rose, Jr., as co-partners d/b/a Meyer, Weiss, Rosen & Rose, Appellants, v. Phyllis LASZLO, Joan Worton, Norman Liebling and Jane Bernstein Alper, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1963-03-12
Citations: 151 So. 2d 14
Docket Number: No. 62-422
Parties: Baron De Hirsch MEYER, Milton Weiss and Leo Rose, Jr., as co-partners d/b/a Meyer, Weiss, Rosen & Rose, Appellants, v. Phyllis LASZLO, Joan Worton, Norman Liebling and Jane Bernstein Alper, Appellees.
Judges: Before CARROLL, BARKDULL and HENDRY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 151
Pages: 14–14

Head Matter:
Baron De Hirsch MEYER, Milton Weiss and Leo Rose, Jr., as co-partners d/b/a Meyer, Weiss, Rosen & Rose, Appellants, v. Phyllis LASZLO, Joan Worton, Norman Liebling and Jane Bernstein Alper, Appellees.
No. 62-422.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
March 12, 1963.
Rehearing Denied April 2, 1963.
Blackwell, Walker & Gray and Melvin Boyd, Miami, for appellants.
Walton, Lantaff, Schroeder, Atkins, Carson & Wahl and Aubrey V. Kendall, Miami, for appellees.
Before CARROLL, BARKDULL and HENDRY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Defendants have appealed from a judgment based on a verdict rendered against them in a negligence action. The appellants raise a number of questions, including contentions that the verdict lacks evidentiary support and that the court erred in certain rulings on evidence and in the jury charges. We have examined and considered the record and briefs in the light of appellants' contentions and conclude that no reversible error has been demonstrated; whereupon the judgment should be and hereby is
Affirmed.