Case Name: STEELPANEL DISTRIBUTORS, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. AMHERST CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1996-03-26
Citations: 918 S.W.2d 399
Docket Number: No. 68174
Parties: STEELPANEL DISTRIBUTORS, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. AMHERST CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before CRANE, C.J., and FLANIGAN and HOFF, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 918
Pages: 399–399

Head Matter:
STEELPANEL DISTRIBUTORS, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. AMHERST CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 68174.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
March 26, 1996.
Lander & Berkowitz, P.C., Ira M. Berkow-itz, Cynthia Forsythe Tolan, St. Louis, for appellant.
Borgmann, Hanlon, Schwartz & Wilson, L.L.C., Edward J. Hanlon, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before CRANE, C.J., and FLANIGAN and HOFF, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from the trial court's entry of judgment in favor of plaintiff in an action on open account for building materials sold. The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).