Case Name: GALVESTON, H. & S. A. RY. CO. v. F. H. TODD and Mrs. F. H. Todd
Court: Texas Commission of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1929-04-24
Citations: 16 S.W.2d 1115
Docket Number: No. 1218—5292
Parties: GALVESTON, H. & S. A. RY. CO. v. F. H. TODD and Mrs. F. H. Todd.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 16
Pages: 1115–1115

Head Matter:
GALVESTON, H. & S. A. RY. CO. v. F. H. TODD and Mrs. F. H. Todd.
(No. 1218—5292.)
Commission of Appeals of Texas, Section A.
April 24, 1929.
Baker, Botts, Parker & Garwood, of Houston, and Kemp & Nagle, of El Paso, for plaintiff in error.
Jones, Hardie & Grambling, J. H. McBroom, and David E. Mulcahy, all of El Paso, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
HARVEY P. J.
This is a companion case to G., H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. Potter Floral & Confectionery Co. (Tex. Com. App.) 16 S.W.(2d) 1114, this day decided. With respect to liability of the railway company, there is no essential difference between the facts of that case and of this one.
We recommend that the judgment rendered by the trial court against the plaintiff in error and that of the Court of Civil Appeals affirming same be reversed, and that judgment denying a recovery by the defendants in error be here rendered.
CURETON, C. J.
Judgments of the district court and Court of Civil Appeals are both reversed, and judgment rendered for the plaintiff in error, as recommended by the Commission of Appeals.