Case Name: PAINE, WEBBER, JACKSON & CURTIS, INC., Appellant, v. Wimberly BENNETT, Christopha Sanders, Thomas J. Northcutt, Jr., and Fort Hope Development, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1985-05-14
Citations: 469 So. 2d 881
Docket Number: No. 85-18
Parties: PAINE, WEBBER, JACKSON & CURTIS, INC., Appellant, v. Wimberly BENNETT, Christopha Sanders, Thomas J. Northcutt, Jr., and Fort Hope Development, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.
Judges: Before NESBITT, BASKIN and JOR-GENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 469
Pages: 881–881

Head Matter:
PAINE, WEBBER, JACKSON & CURTIS, INC., Appellant, v. Wimberly BENNETT, Christopha Sanders, Thomas J. Northcutt, Jr., and Fort Hope Development, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.
No. 85-18.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 14, 1985.
Rehearing Denied June 12, 1985.
Ruden, Barnett, MeClosky, Schuster & Russell and Patricia E. Cowart and David A. Weintraub, Miami, for appellant.
Gilbride, Heller & Brown and Sharon L. Blake, Miami, for appellees.
Before NESBITT, BASKIN and JOR-GENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
JORGENSON, Judge.
We say, "No, thank you" to appellant Paine, Webber's invitation to review a trial court order denying a motion to compel arbitration, see § 682.20(l)(a), Fla.Stat. (1983), upon a holding that this court will not issue advisory opinions.
The complaint filed in this action was dismissed with leave to amend at the urging of Paine, Webber. The order which we are invited to review is based upon that complaint. We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction without prejudice to the appellant to file anew in the event an amended complaint is properly filed and the trial court issues a similar order.
Appeal dismissed.