Case Name: Terrance BOSTICK, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-01-02
Citations: 593 So. 2d 494
Docket Number: No. 70996
Parties: Terrance BOSTICK, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: OVERTON, McDonald, GRIMES and HARDING, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 593
Pages: 494–496

Head Matter:
Terrance BOSTICK, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 70996.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Jan. 2, 1992.
Rehearings Denied March 11, 1992.
Kenneth P. Speiller of the Law Offices of Max P. Engle, Miami, for petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Georgina Jimenez-Orosa, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent.
Edward A. Hanna, Jr., Fort Lauderdale, amicus curiae, for Nick Navarro, Sheriff.
Joseph S. Paglino of the Law Office of Joseph S. Paglino, Miami, amicus curiae.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have Florida v. Bostick, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2382, 115 L.Ed.2d 389 (1991), rev'g 554 So.2d 1153 (Fla.1989), for consideration on remand from the United States Supreme Court.
The facts are set forth fully in our previous opinion. Bostick v. State, 554 So.2d 1153, 1154-55 (Fla.1989). Briefly stated, two officers boarded the Greyhound bus on which Bostick was a passenger, obtained consent to search his luggage, and seized cocaine found in one of his bags. Bostick moved to suppress the evidence, arguing that his consent was not voluntary. The trial court denied the motion, and Bostick was convicted of trafficking in cocaine. The district court affirmed.
In light of the Supreme Court's opinion, we now approve the decision of the district court.
It is so ordered.
OVERTON, McDonald, GRIMES and HARDING, JJ., concur.
BARKETT, J., dissents with an opinion, in which SHAW, C.J., and KOGAN, J., concur.