Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Earnest HAYNESWORTH, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-08-03
Citations: 103 F. App'x 746
Docket Number: No. 04-6578
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Earnest HAYNESWORTH, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 103
Pages: 746–747

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Earnest HAYNESWORTH, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 04-6578.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 19, 2004.
Decided: Aug. 3, 2004.
Earnest Haynesworth, Appellant pro se.
Timothy Richard Murphy, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before LUTTIG and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Earnest Haynesworth appeals the district court's orders denying his Fed. R.Crim.P. 41(g) motion for return of property and motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Haynesworth, No. CR-00-52 (E.D.Va. Feb. 11, 2004). We dis pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately-presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED