Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Reginald MIMMS, a/k/a Gerald King, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-10-19
Citations: 333 F. App'x 793
Docket Number: No. 09-6633
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Reginald MIMMS, a/k/a Gerald King, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 333
Pages: 793–794

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Reginald MIMMS, a/k/a Gerald King, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 09-6633.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 15, 2009.
Decided: Oct. 19, 2009.
Reginald Mimms, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Joseph William Hooge Mott, Assistant United States Attorneys, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Reginald Mimms appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a writ of audita querela, pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Mimms' motion for a transcript at Government expense and affirm the district court's order. See United States v. Mimms, No. 7:99-cr-00048-JCT, 2009 WL 700415 (W.D.Va. March 17, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.