Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lazaro Julian Viana ECHEVERRIA, also known as El Cubano, also known as Cubanito, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-10-02
Citations: 616 F. App'x 768
Docket Number: No. 14-50408
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lazaro Julian Viana ECHEVERRIA, also known as El Cubano, also known as Cubanito, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 616
Pages: 768–768

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lazaro Julian Viana ECHEVERRIA, also known as El Cubano, also known as Cubanito, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 14-50408
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Oct. 2, 2015.
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Joseph Dean Vasquez, Esq., El Paso, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Lazaro Julian Viana Echeverría,' Hialeah, FL, pro se.
Before KING, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Lazaro Julian Viana Echeverría has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Echeverria has not filed a response.
During the pendency of this appeal, Echeverría completed his six-month term of imprisonment. His release from custody renders moot any challenge to the term of imprisonment. See United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis, 483 F.3d 381, 382 (5th Cir.2007).
We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as frivolous, see 5th Cir. R. 42.2, and in part as moot, see Rosenbaum-Alanis, 483 F.3d at 383.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.