Case Name: WITHINGTON v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1922-12-20
Citations: 245 S.W. 912
Docket Number: No. 7391
Parties: WITHINGTON v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 245
Pages: 912–912

Head Matter:
WITHINGTON v. STATE.
(No. 7391.)
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Dec. 20, 1922.)
Criminal law &wkey;> 1094 — Conviction supported by evidence affirmed in absence of bills of exception.
Upon appeal in a criminal case, where there are no bills of exception in the record and the evidence supports the' verdict, the conviction must be affirmed.
other eases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes
Appeal from Criminal District Court, Dallas County; C. A. Pippen, Judge.
E. D. Withington, alias M. D. Leonard, was convicted for attempting to pass a forged instrument, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
R. G. Storey, Asst. Atfy. Gen., for the State.

Opinion:
HAWKINS, J.
Conviction is for attempting to pass as true a forged instrument in writing, with penalty fixed at two years in the penitentiary.
There are no bills of exception in the record. The evidence supports the verdict.
The judgment must be affirmed.