Case Name: DROPE v. MILLER
Court: Superior Court of the Territory of Arkansas
Jurisdiction: Arkansas
Decision Date: 1827-04
Citations: 7 F. Cas. 1108
Docket Number: 
Parties: DROPE v. MILLER.
Judges: Before JOHNSON and ESKRIDGE, Juag-as.
Reporter: Federal Cases
Volume: 7
Pages: 1108–1108

Head Matter:
Case No. 4,092a.
DROPE v. MILLER.
[Hempst. 49.]
Superior Court, Territory of Arkansas.
April, 1827.
Equity—Issue for Juki.
Issue directed out of chancery to ascertain whether a partnership, asserted by complainant and denied by defendant, was formed as alleged.
(This was a bill in equity by William Drope against John MillerJ Order to try disputed facts.
Before JOHNSON and ESKRIDGE, Juag-as.

Opinion:
OPINION OE
THE COURT.
In this case it is alleged by the complainant that he formed a partnership in trade with the defendant, in April, 1S10, which fact is denied by the defendant. It is, therefore, ordered that a jury come at the next term on the law side of this court to ascertain by their verdict, whether there was or was not a partnership in trade formed by said Drope and Miller, in April, 1S10, and that the verdict of the jury be immediately certified to this court as a court in chancery.