Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Arthur Shahumyan, Also Known as Artur Shahumyan, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2004-03-15
Citations: 5 A.D.3d 612
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Arthur Shahumyan, Also Known as Artur Shahumyan, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 5
Pages: 612–613

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Arthur Shahumyan, Also Known as Artur Shahumyan, Appellant.
[772 NYS2d 854]

Opinion:
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrus, J.), rendered October 24, 2002, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the sentencing court improperly considered charges of which he was acquitted as a basis for imposing sentence is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Emmanus, 300 AD2d 504 [2002]), and, in any event, is without merit (see People v Emmanus, supra; People v Robinson, 250 AD2d 629 [1998]).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Santucci, J.P., Krausman, Luciano and Townes, JJ., concur.