Case Name: George A. Salmon, Appellant, v. Rockefeller Center Management Corp., Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2002-11-26
Citations: 299 A.D.2d 297
Docket Number: 
Parties: George A. Salmon, Appellant, v Rockefeller Center Management Corp., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 299
Pages: 297–298

Head Matter:
George A. Salmon, Appellant, v Rockefeller Center Management Corp., Respondent.
[750 NYS2d 599]

Opinion:
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered May 24, 2001, in a jury trial, dismissing the complaint after the close of evidence, in an action in which plaintiff, an employee of nonparty building owner Rockefeller Center Properties (RCP), seeks to recover for personal injuries allegedly caused by defendant Rockefeller Center Management Corp. (RCMC)'s negligent maintenance of an elevator in the building, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff's evidence that building personnel who signed contracts with elevator maintenance companies on behalf of RCMC, and in other ways appeared to be RCMC employees responsible for elevator maintenance, was "conclusively answered" with evidence (see McDonald v Metropolitan St. Ry. Co., 167 NY 66, 70), including W-2 forms, establishing that such personnel, contrary to their mistaken understanding, were not employees of RCMC but RCP, i.e., plaintiffs coemployees. Therefore, workers' compensation is plaintiffs exclusive remedy. Certainly, there is no evidence that particular personnel of RCMC supervised the personnel that plaintiff claims were responsible for elevator maintenance. We have considered plaintiffs other arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Lerner, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.