Case Name: Hatfield et al. v. Semans, Appellant; Garlow v. Semans, Appellant; Donley et al. v. Semans, Appellant; Garlow v. Semans, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1918-01-07
Citations: 260 Pa. 94
Docket Number: Appeals, Nos. 62, 63, 64, 65
Parties: Hatfield et al. v. Semans, Appellant. Garlow v. Semans, Appellant. Donley et al. v. Semans, Appellant. Garlow v. Semans, Appellant.
Judges: Before Brown, C. J., Mestrezat, Stewart, Frazer and Walling, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 260
Pages: 94–94

Head Matter:
Hatfield et al. v. Semans, Appellant. Garlow v. Semans, Appellant. Donley et al. v. Semans, Appellant. Garlow v. Semans, Appellant.
Argued Oct. 1,1917.
Appeals, Nos. 62, 63, 64, 65, Oct. T., 1917, by defendant, from judgments of C. P. Greene Co., June T., 1916, Nos. 29, 30, 31, 32, dismissing exceptions to sheriff’s sale.
Before Brown, C. J., Mestrezat, Stewart, Frazer and Walling, JJ.
Affirmed.
Exceptions to sheriff’s sale. Before Bay, P. J.
Motions to quash appeals.
The court dismissed the exceptions. Defendants appealed.
Error assigned in each case was in dismissing the exceptions.
January 7, 1918:

Opinion:
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Frazer,
The records in these cases raise the identical questions disposed of in the opinion in Donley v. Semans filed this day. For the reasons set forth in that opinion these appeals are quashed.