Case Name: Chaz DAVIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2001-12-26
Citations: 802 So. 2d 484
Docket Number: No. 3D01-3095
Parties: Chaz DAVIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before COPE, FLETCHER, and RAMIREZ, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 802
Pages: 484–484

Head Matter:
Chaz DAVIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D01-3095.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 26, 2001.
Chaz Davis, in proper person.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before COPE, FLETCHER, and RAMIREZ, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Major v. State, 790 So.2d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). We also certify the same question as in Major:
WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAS A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?