Case Name: In re CONFIDENTIAL PARTY
Court: Louisiana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 2004-03-26
Citations: 870 So. 2d 259
Docket Number: No. 2004-B-0275
Parties: In re CONFIDENTIAL PARTY.
Judges: KIMBALL and TRAYLOR, JJ., would accept the consent discipline.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 870
Pages: 259–259

Head Matter:
In re CONFIDENTIAL PARTY.
No. 2004-B-0275.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
March 26, 2004.

Opinion:
In re Confidential Party; Disciplinary Counsel; — Plaintiffs); Applying for Joint Petition for Consent Discipline.
ORDER
Considering the Joint Petition for Consent Discipline filed by respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel,
IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Petition for Consent Discipline be and hereby is rejected pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 20.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter be remanded for consideration of the previously filed formal charges.
KIMBALL and TRAYLOR, JJ., would accept the consent discipline.
/s/ Pascal F. Calogero, Jr. Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana