Case Name: CUTTER v. DOTY
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1833-04
Citations: 1 Ohio Ch. 200
Docket Number: 
Parties: CUTTER v. DOTY.
Judges: 
Reporter: Reports of cases at law and in chancery Ohio
Volume: 1
Pages: 200–200

Head Matter:
CUTTER v. DOTY.
Replevin — expense of parties — costs.
The expenses of the parties in conducting suits, which are taxed as costs, are recovered 'costs, other expenses cannot be included in the'general damages in replevin.
Replevin. The only question presented to the Court was wheth-' er it is competent in assessing damages for the detention of goods replevied, to include the expenses of prosecutiug the suit for the recovery.

Opinion:
By the Court.
The expenses of the suit which constitute taxable costs, are recovered as costs; they cannot be included in the general damages. Other expenses cannot be taken into consideration in an action of replevin.