Case Name: Majed SUBH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF the ARMY, U.S. Army Records Managements & Declassification Agency, DA Freedom of Info and Privacy Office, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-03-17
Citations: 417 F. App'x 285
Docket Number: No. 10-2399
Parties: Majed SUBH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF the ARMY, U.S. Army Records Managements & Declassification Agency, DA Freedom of Info and Privacy Office, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 417
Pages: 285–285

Head Matter:
Majed SUBH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF the ARMY, U.S. Army Records Managements & Declassification Agency, DA Freedom of Info and Privacy Office, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 10-2399.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 15, 2011.
Decided: March 17, 2011.
Majed Subh, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin J. Mikolashek, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Majed Subh appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to the Defendant in his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Subh v. Department of the Army, No. 1:10-cv-00433-LMB-TR J, 2010 WL 4961613 (E.D.Va. Nov. 30, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.