Case Name: Jane FELIX; B.N. Coone, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF BLOOMFIELD, Defendant-Appellant. Liberty Counsel, Amicus Curiae
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-02-06
Citations: 847 F.3d 1214
Docket Number: No. 14-2149
Parties: Jane FELIX; B.N. Coone, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF BLOOMFIELD, Defendant-Appellant. Liberty Counsel, Amicus Curiae.
Judges: Before TYMKOVICH, Chief Judge, KELLY, BRISCOE, LUCERO, HOLMES, MATHESON, BACHARACH, PHILLIPS, McHUGH, and MORITZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 847
Pages: 1214–1221

Head Matter:
Jane FELIX; B.N. Coone, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF BLOOMFIELD, Defendant-Appellant. Liberty Counsel, Amicus Curiae.
No. 14-2149
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
Filed February 6, 2017
Elisabeth Bechtold, ACLU of New Mexico, Andrew G. Schultz, Esq., Rodey Dic-kason Sloan Akin & Robb, Albuquerque, NM, Matthew M. Beck, Office of the United States Attorney, Las Cruces, NM, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.
David Andrew Cortman, Alliance Defending Freedom, Lawreneeville, GA, Thomas Ryan Lane, Aztec, NM, Joel Lee Oster, Alliance Defending Freedom, Lea-wood, KS, Jonathan Andrew Scruggs, Kevin H. Theriot, Alliance Defending Freedom, Scottsdale, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Mary Elizabeth McAlister, Liberty Counsel, Lynchburg, VA, Horatio Gabriel Mihet, Liberty Counsel, Maitland, FL, Anita Staver, Mathew D. Staver, Liberty Counsel, Orlando, FL, for Amicus Curiae.
Before TYMKOVICH, Chief Judge, KELLY, BRISCOE, LUCERO, HOLMES, MATHESON, BACHARACH, PHILLIPS, McHUGH, and MORITZ, Circuit Judges.
The Honorable Harris L Hartz is recused and did not participate in consideration of this petition. The Honorable Neil M. Gorsuch considered the petition and response upon circulation, but did not participate in the final issuance of this order.

Opinion:
ORDER
This matter is before the court on the appellant's Petition for Rehearing En Banc. We also have a response from the appellees. Both the petition and response were circulated to all the active judges of the court who are not disqualified. See Fed. R. App. P. 35(a).
Upon consideration, a poll was called, and a majority voted to deny the request for en banc rehearing. Accordingly, the petition is denied.
Chief Judge Tymkovich and Judge Kelly voted to grant en banc rehearing and Judge Kelly has written separately in dissent. Chief Judge Tymkovich joins that dissent.