Case Name: Bene't WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2017-01-31
Citations: 509 S.W.3d 155
Docket Number: WD 79162
Parties: Bene’t WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Division Two: Cynthia L. Martin, Presiding Judge, Lisa White Hardwick and Alok Ahuja, Judges
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 509
Pages: 155–155

Head Matter:
Bene’t WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
WD 79162
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
January 31, 2017
Laura G. Martin, Kansas City for appellant.
Nathan J. Aquino, Jefferson City for respondent.
Before Division Two: Cynthia L. Martin, Presiding Judge, Lisa White Hardwick and Alok Ahuja, Judges

Opinion:
Order
Per Curiam
Bene't Williams appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after he pled guilty to six offenses. He contends the motion court clearly erred in denying his claim that plea counsel was ineffective for failing to present mitigating evidence at sentencing concerning the circumstances surrounding some of the prior convictions listed in his sentencing assessment report. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment denying post-conviction relief.
AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b)