Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ryan Lamar DIXON, a/k/a Big Gee, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-12-22
Citations: 627 F. App'x 197
Docket Number: No. 15-7444
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Ryan Lamar DIXON, a/k/a Big Gee, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 627
Pages: 197–198

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Ryan Lamar DIXON, a/k/a Big Gee, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-7444.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 17, 2015.
Decided: Dec. 22, 2015.
Ryan Lamar Dixon, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Barrett Taylor, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ryan Lamar Dixon appeals the district court's order denying Dixon's motion to reconsider the court's prior order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Dixon, No. 3:11-cr-00686-CMC-1 (D.S.C. Aug. 27, 2015); see also United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir.2010) (district court is without authority to reconsider ruling on a § 3582(c)(2) motion). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.