Case Name: A. D. BEAVER, Respondent, v. W. T. CARPENTER et al., Appellants
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1929-09-07
Citations: 100 Cal. App. 525
Docket Number: Civ. No. 6555
Parties: A. D. BEAVER, Respondent, v. W. T. CARPENTER et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports
Volume: 100
Pages: 525–526

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 6555.
Second Appellate District, Division One.
September 7, 1929.]
A. D. BEAVER, Respondent, v. W. T. CARPENTER et al., Appellants.
C. J. Novotny and E. J. Dufresne for Appellants.
Liggett & Liggett for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This matter comes up on motion of respondent to dismiss an appeal taken by the defendants in the above-entitled action on the grounds:
1. That no opening brief and points and authorities have been served or filed in the above-named court within thirty clays from the date of the filing of the transcript herein, or at all, as provided by the rules of this court.
2. That no extension of time for the filing of- the same has ever been granted, either by stipulation or affidavit, or at all.
The appellants have not even attempted to file any brief or any points or authorities, excepting only the reply affidavit of C. J. Novotny in opposition to the motion to dismiss. In said reply affidavit there is no sufficient reason given for the failure to comply with the rules of the court.
The appeal is therefore dismissed.