Case Name: William L. CLAY et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DOMINION OF CANADA, Defendant; William L. CLAY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DOMINION OF CANADA, Defendant; Angelo R. SANTORA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HER MAJESTY, ELIZABETH, as of right QUEEN OF CANADA, and Canada, Defendants; Arthur SHAUGHNESSY and Anne Shaughnessy, Plaintiffis-Appellants, v. HER MAJESTY, ELIZABETH, QUEEN OF CANADA, and Canada, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1956-12-07
Citations: 238 F.2d 400
Docket Number: Nos. 139-142, Docket 24208-24211
Parties: William L. CLAY et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DOMINION OF CANADA, Defendant. William L. CLAY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DOMINION OF CANADA, Defendant. Angelo R. SANTORA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HER MAJESTY, ELIZABETH, as of right QUEEN OF CANADA, and Canada, Defendants. Arthur SHAUGHNESSY and Anne Shaughnessy, Plaintiffis-Appellants, v. HER MAJESTY, ELIZABETH, QUEEN OF CANADA, and Canada, Defendants.
Judges: Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and FRANK and LUMBARD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 238
Pages: 400–400

Head Matter:
William L. CLAY et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DOMINION OF CANADA, Defendant. William L. CLAY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DOMINION OF CANADA, Defendant. Angelo R. SANTORA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HER MAJESTY, ELIZABETH, as of right QUEEN OF CANADA, and Canada, Defendants. Arthur SHAUGHNESSY and Anne Shaughnessy, Plaintiffis-Appellants, v. HER MAJESTY, ELIZABETH, QUEEN OF CANADA, and Canada, Defendants.
Nos. 139-142, Docket 24208-24211.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued Dec. 7, 1956.
Decided Dec. 7, 1956.
John W. Guzzetta, Mount Vernon, N. Y. (William L. Clay, Rochester, N. Y., on the brief), for plaintiffs-appellants.
Inzer B. Wyatt, New York City (Sullivan & Cromwell, New York City, on the brief), for Arnold D. P. Heeney, Ambassador of Canada to United States, as amicus curiae.
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and FRANK and LUMBARD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Judgments affirmed in open court. 144 F.Supp. 746.