Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Thomas W. HORNSBY, Appellant; Thomas W. HORNSBY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-11-28
Citations: 910 S.W.2d 830
Docket Number: Nos. WD 48899, WD 50576
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Thomas W. HORNSBY, Appellant. Thomas W. HORNSBY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before SPINDEN, P.J., and BRECKENRIDGE and SMART, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 910
Pages: 830–830

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Thomas W. HORNSBY, Appellant. Thomas W. HORNSBY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. WD 48899, WD 50576.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Nov. 28, 1995.
Gary E. Brotherton, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., David G. Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before SPINDEN, P.J., and BRECKENRIDGE and SMART, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Thomas W. Hornsby was convicted by a jury of the class A felony of robbery in the first degree, § 569.020, RSMo 1994, and sentenced by the court as a prior offender, § 558.016 and 557.036.4, RSMo 1994, to twelve years in prison, to be served consecutively to previous sentences. Mr. Hornsby appeals his conviction and the denial of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion, claiming that the trial court plainly erred in allowing the State to exercise a racially motivated peremptory strike and that the motion court erred in denying his post-conviction motion because his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to file a timely request for change of judge.
The judgment of conviction and the order denying the Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion are affirmed. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).