Case Name: J. W. WHITICE, Plaintiff in Error, v. STATE of Florida, Defendant in Error
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1936-06-18
Citations: 169 So. 927
Docket Number: 
Parties: J. W. WHITICE, Plaintiff in Error, v. STATE of Florida, Defendant in Error.
Judges: WHITFIELD, C. J., and ELLIS. TERRELL, BROWN, BUFORD, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter
Volume: 169
Pages: 927–927

Head Matter:
J. W. WHITICE, Plaintiff in Error, v. STATE of Florida, Defendant in Error.
Supreme Court of Florida.
June 18, 1936.
Errol S. Willes, of Fort Pierce, for plaintiff in error.
Cary D. Landis, Atty. Gen., Roy Campbell, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Angus Sumner, State Atty., of Fort Pierce, for the State.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the entire record in this cause, we are convinced that the ends of justice require a new trial. So the judgment of the circuit court is hereby reversed. See Coker v. State, 83 Fla. 672, 93 So. 176; Howell v. State, 121 Fla. 327, 163 So. 691; Woodward v. State, 113 Fla. 301, 151 So. 509; Pass v. State, 121 Fla. 336, 163 So. 583; Davis v. State, 76 Fla. 179, 79 So. 450.
Reversed.
WHITFIELD, C. J., and ELLIS. TERRELL, BROWN, BUFORD, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.