Case Name: The State of Ohio, Appellant, v. Tuttle, Appellee
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2004-12-08
Citations: 104 Ohio St. 3d 242
Docket Number: No. 2003-0573
Parties: The State of Ohio, Appellant, v. Tuttle, Appellee.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 104
Pages: 242–243

Head Matter:
The State of Ohio, Appellant, v. Tuttle, Appellee.
[Cite as State v. Tuttle, 104 Ohio St.3d 242, 2004-Ohio-6392.]
(No. 2003-0573
Submitted November 30, 2004
Decided December 8, 2004.)

Opinion:
{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Thompson, 102 Ohio St.3d 287, 2004-Ohio-2946, 809 N.E.2d 1134, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for consideration of appellant's remaining assignments of error and further action not inconsistent with State v. Thompson.
William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Jon W. Oebker, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.
Richard Agopian, for appellee.
Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor and O'Donnell, JJ., concur.
F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.