Case Name: Timothy and Catherine BAUER, Appellants, v. OMR CORPORATION, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2009-11-17
Citations: 299 S.W.3d 32
Docket Number: No. ED 92384
Parties: Timothy and Catherine BAUER, Appellants, v. OMR CORPORATION, Respondent.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and NANNETTE BAKER, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 299
Pages: 32–32

Head Matter:
Timothy and Catherine BAUER, Appellants, v. OMR CORPORATION, Respondent.
No. ED 92384.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Nov. 17, 2009.
Rehearing Denied Dec. 17, 2009.
Timothy Bauer, St. Louis, MO, pro se.
Matthew J. Sauter, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and NANNETTE BAKER, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Timothy and Catherine Bauer (Plaintiffs) appeal pro se the trial court's judgment denying them motion to disqualify the trial judge, Hon. David L. Dowd, and dismissing their petition against OMR Corporation (Respondent).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for them information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).