Case Name: CONNOLLY v. BOUCK et al.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1908-05-09
Citations: 160 F. 1022
Docket Number: No. 2,498
Parties: CONNOLLY v. BOUCK et al.
Judges: Before SANBORN and HOOK, Circuit Judges, and PHILIPS, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter
Volume: 160
Pages: 1022–1022

Head Matter:
CONNOLLY v. BOUCK et al.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
May 9, 1908.)
No. 2,498.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Colorado.
Hugh Butler, for appellant. H. Riddell, for appellees.
Before SANBORN and HOOK, Circuit Judges, and PHILIPS, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appeal in this case is dismissed, upon the ground that the decree which it challenges is an interlocutory and not a final decree, upon the authority of Railway Company v. Simmons, 123 U. S. 52, 8 Sup. Ct. 58, 31 L. Ed. 73, Parsons v. Robinson, 122 U. S. 112, 7 Sup. Ct. 1153, 30 L. Ed. 1122, Chase v. Driver, 92 Fed. 780, 783, 784, 34 C. C. A. 668, 671, 672, and the cases there cited.