Case Name: Mark Alan LANE, Appellant v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-12-19
Citations: 442 F. App'x 578
Docket Number: No. 11-5175
Parties: Mark Alan LANE, Appellant v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Appellee.
Judges: BEFORE: GARLAND, BROWN, and KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 442
Pages: 578–579

Head Matter:
Mark Alan LANE, Appellant v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Appellee.
No. 11-5175.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Dec. 19, 2011.
Mark Alan Lane, Lompoc, CA, pro se.
Warden, United States Penitentiary, Lompoc, CA, R. Craig Lawrence, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Washington, DC, for Ap-pellee.
BEFORE: GARLAND, BROWN, and KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by the appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's order filed July 8, 2011, 2011 WL 2669203, be affirmed. The Bureau of Prisons has exempted its inmate records systems from the Privacy Act's accuracy and amendment provisions. See Martinez v. Bureau of Prisons, 444 F.3d 620, 624 (D.C.Cir.2006) (per curiam); White v. United States Probation Office, 148 F.3d 1124, 1125 (D.C.Cir.1998) (per curiam).
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to -withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.