Case Name: Karen Sherman et al, Respondents, v. Stephen Pollack, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1985-04-22
Citations: 110 A.D.2d 833
Docket Number: 
Parties: Karen Sherman et al, Respondents, v Stephen Pollack, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 110
Pages: 833–834

Head Matter:
Karen Sherman et al, Respondents, v Stephen Pollack, Appellant.

Opinion:
It is undisputed that defendant was not the physician who treated plaintiff Karen Sherman on April 16, 1979, the date upon which the acts occurred which allegedly constitute the basis for the malpractice claim. Further, plaintiffs have not set forth any facts upon which defendant may be held vicariously liable for the actions of the physician who allegedly treated plaintiff Karen Sherman on April 16, 1979.
Under these circumstances, dismissal of the complaint is warranted. Titone, J. P., O'Connor, Rubin and Lawrence, JJ., concur.