Case Name: CITY OF ALACHUA, Florida, a municipal corporation, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. Herbert MATILSKY, Barbara Matilsky, Rupert Murphy, Robert N. Worth, Robert W. Rogers, Kenneth M. Brown, Viola M. Brown, and Jule E. Schmidt, Appellees and Cross-Appellants
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1982-12-01
Citations: 423 So. 2d 451
Docket Number: No. AL-139
Parties: CITY OF ALACHUA, Florida, a municipal corporation, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. Herbert MATILSKY, Barbara Matilsky, Rupert Murphy, Robert N. Worth, Robert W. Rogers, Kenneth M. Brown, Viola M. Brown, and Jule E. Schmidt, Appellees and Cross-Appellants.
Judges: McCORD and MILLS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 423
Pages: 451–451

Head Matter:
CITY OF ALACHUA, Florida, a municipal corporation, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. Herbert MATILSKY, Barbara Matilsky, Rupert Murphy, Robert N. Worth, Robert W. Rogers, Kenneth M. Brown, Viola M. Brown, and Jule E. Schmidt, Appellees and Cross-Appellants.
No. AL-139.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Dec. 1, 1982.
Allison E. Folds, of Watson, Folds, Stead-ham, Sproull, Christmann & Brashear, Gainesville, for appellant and cross-appel-lee.
David LaCroix, Gainesville, for appellees and cross-appellants.

Opinion:
ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., Chief Judge.
The trial court correctly held, at the instance of appellee Schmidt, that Alachua's ordinances annexing certain territory violate the contiguity requirement and other requirements of chapter 171, Florida Statutes. We find it unnecessary to reach, and so do not decide, questions on the cross-appeal concerning the standing of other objectors.
AFFIRMED.
McCORD and MILLS, JJ., concur.