Case Name: Felix NEMBHARD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-07-26
Citations: 657 So. 2d 971
Docket Number: No. 95-119
Parties: Felix NEMBHARD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, GERSTEN and GREEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 657
Pages: 971–971

Head Matter:
Felix NEMBHARD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 95-119.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 26, 1995.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Donald Tunnage, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Cynthia A. Greenfield, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before BARKDULL, GERSTEN and GREEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied appellant's motions for mistrial where the impermissible testimony was harmless in light of the other overwhelming evidence of guilt. State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).
Affirmed.