Case Name: GEORGETOWN RAIL EQUIPMENT COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee v. HOLLAND L.P., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-08-01
Citations: 694 F. App'x 810
Docket Number: 2016-2297
Parties: GEORGETOWN RAIL EQUIPMENT COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee v. HOLLAND L.P., Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before Reyna, Schall, and Wallach, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 694
Pages: 810–810

Head Matter:
GEORGETOWN RAIL EQUIPMENT COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee v. HOLLAND L.P., Defendant-Appellant
2016-2297
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
August 1, 2017
Dana M. Herberholz, Attorney, Christopher Cuneo, Senior Attorney, Jamie K. Ellsworth, Esq., Attorney, Parsons Behle & Latimer, Boise, ID, C. Kevin Speirs, Parsons Behle & Latimer, Salt Lake City, UT, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Daniel J. Schwartz, Kathryn Ann Feier-eisel, Faegre Baker Daniels LLP, Chicago, IL, Lauren J. Frank, Attorney, Timothy E. Grimsrud, Attorney, Faegre Baker Daniels LLP, Minneapolis, MN, for Defendant-Appellant
Before Reyna, Schall, and Wallach, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Per Curiam.
Because the record in this case contains extensive material marked as confidential, the court has issued its opinion dated August 1, 2017 under seal. The court does not believe, however, that the opinion contains confidential material.
The parties are hereby ordered to show cause, by means of a single joint response coordinated among the parties, why the opinion should not be unsealed. The response to this order must specify which words, if any, are proposed to be redacted, and must specifically state the cause for each such requested redaction. If the parties propose redactions, the response to this order must also propose specific words to replace each of the proposed redactions in an unsealed opinion. The joint response shall be filed no later than August 15, 2017.