Case Name: OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, a Connecticut for Profit Corporation, Coastal Elevator Service Corp., a Florida for Profit Corporation, Louis Carl Devincentis, Individually and as an Employee of Otis Elevator Company, James Duda, Individually and as an Employee of Otis Elevator Company, Daniel Hunter, Individually and as an Employee of Otis Elevator Company, and Robert Mowrey, Individually and as an Employee of Otis Elevator Company, Petitioners, v. Catherine CRAIG-MYERS, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Robert Myers, Respondent.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2019-02-28
Citations: 264 So. 3d 408
Docket Number: No. 1D18-2825
Parties: OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, a Connecticut for Profit Corporation, Coastal Elevator Service Corp., a Florida for Profit Corporation, Louis Carl Devincentis, Individually and as an Employee of Otis Elevator Company, James Duda, Individually and as an Employee of Otis Elevator Company, Daniel Hunter, Individually and as an Employee of Otis Elevator Company, and Robert Mowrey, Individually and as an Employee of Otis Elevator Company, Petitioners,
v.
Catherine CRAIG-MYERS, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Robert Myers, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 264
Pages: 408–409

Head Matter:
OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, a Connecticut for Profit Corporation, Coastal Elevator Service Corp., a Florida for Profit Corporation, Louis Carl Devincentis, Individually and as an Employee of Otis Elevator Company, James Duda, Individually and as an Employee of Otis Elevator Company, Daniel Hunter, Individually and as an Employee of Otis Elevator Company, and Robert Mowrey, Individually and as an Employee of Otis Elevator Company, Petitioners,
v.
Catherine CRAIG-MYERS, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Robert Myers, Respondent.
No. 1D18-2825
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
February 28, 2019
Kenneth B. Bell and Lauren V. Purdy of Gunster Yoakley & Stewart, P.A., Tallahassee, for Petitioners.
Philip J. Padovano of Brannock & Humphries, Tallahassee, and Maegen Peek Luka of Brannock & Humphries, Tampa; Sidney L. Matthew of Sidney L. Matthew, P.A., Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
DENIED .
B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Roberts, J., concur; Osterhaus, J., concurs with opinion.