Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William PINKUS, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1972-10-16
Citations: 466 F.2d 1405
Docket Number: No. 72-1069
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William PINKUS, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 466
Pages: 1405–1405

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William PINKUS, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 72-1069.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Oct. 16, 1972.
Robert C. Bonner, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Eric A. Nobles, Asst. U. S. Atty., William D. Keller, U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.
Bernard A. Berkman (argued), Larry S. Gordon, Niki Z. Schwartz, of Berk-man, Gordon, Kancelbaum & Schwartz, Cleveland, Ohio, Jeremiah Casselman, Beverly Hills, Cal., for defendantappellee.
Before MERRILL and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges, and TAYLOR, District Judge.
The Honorable Fred M. Taylor, Senior District Judge for the District of Idaho, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Under the compulsion of United States v. Weller, 466 F.2d 886, (CA9. 1972), we hold that we have no jurisdiction and that the appeal must be dismissed.
It is so ordered.