Case Name: JACOB DIEHL, Respondent, v. S. G. HULL and C. H. Hull, Appellants
Court: Idaho Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Idaho
Decision Date: 1870-01
Citations: 1 Idaho 352
Docket Number: 
Parties: JACOB DIEHL, Respondent, v. S. G. HULL and C. H. Hull, Appellants.
Judges: Noggle, C. J., and Kelly, J., concurred.
Reporter: Idaho Reports
Volume: 1
Pages: 352–353

Head Matter:
JACOB DIEHL, Respondent, v. S. G. HULL and C. H. Hull, Appellants.
Complaint — Appellate Court. — Where an action is tried in the district court upon its merits, and a finding of facts is made and judgment rendered thereon, no exceptions being taken, the only question that will be considered by the supreme court is whether the complaint states facts sufficient to warrant the judgment.
Appeal from the second judicial district, Ada county.
A. Heed, for tbe appellants.
H. B. Prickett, for tbe respondent.

Opinion:
Lewis, J.,
delivered tbe opinion.
Noggle, C. J., and Kelly, J., concurred.
Tbis is an action of replevin, brought to recover certain personal chattels. Answer, general denial and plea of property in defendant. Judgment for plaintiffs and defendant appeals. No motion for a new trial was made in tbe court below, and no exceptions taken. Tbe case was tried on its merits.
The only question before us for consideration is, whether the complaint states facts sufficient to warrant tbe judgment. Tbe defendant it seems was of tbe opinion that tbe complaint was good, as be took issue thereon and went to trial on tbe facts. While it is not, perhaps, such a complaint as we would adopt for a precedent in like cases, still we think, taking tbe facts stated as a whole, that tbe judgment is fully warranted on tbe pleadings and findings of tbe court. Tbe judgment of tbe district court is affirmed.