Case Name: Rosemary ALLISON, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. John R. ALLISON, III, Appellee/Cross-Appellant
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1997-05-07
Citations: 692 So. 2d 1013
Docket Number: No. 95-3249
Parties: Rosemary ALLISON, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. John R. ALLISON, III, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
Judges: GUNTHER, C.J., and SHAHOOD, J., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 692
Pages: 1013–1014

Head Matter:
Rosemary ALLISON, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. John R. ALLISON, III, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
No. 95-3249.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
May 7, 1997.
Deborah Marks, North Miami, for appellant/cross-appellee.
John R. Allison, III, Miami, pro se.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Former Wife appeals and Former Husband cross-appeals the trial court's judgment on Former Wife's modification petition. We affirm in all respects, but reverse the award of rehabilitative alimony because it contains no specific findings as to any rehabilitative plan for Former Wife. Collinsworth v. Collinsworth, 624 So.2d 287, 291 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). On remand, the trial court should fashion a plan that makes specific findings addressing the objective of rehabilitation, the costs of the plan, and the projected period necessary for Former Wife to complete her rehabilitation. Id.; see Wetzel v. Wetzel, 671 So.2d 234, 235-36 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Clance v. Clance, 576 So.2d 746, 747 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.
GUNTHER, C.J., and SHAHOOD, J., concur.
KLEIN, J., dissents with opinion.