Case Name: SAF-T-POP CORPORATION v. HARRY E. DAVIS CO.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1941-04-11
Citations: 119 F.2d 416
Docket Number: No. 8617
Parties: SAF-T-POP CORPORATION v. HARRY E. DAVIS CO.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 119
Pages: 416–416

Head Matter:
SAF-T-POP CORPORATION v. HARRY E. DAVIS CO.
No. 8617.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
April 11, 1941.
Williams, Bradbury & Hinkle, of Chicago, 111., and Krueger, Gorman & Davis, of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellant.
F. Bascom Smith, of New York City, N. D. Parker, Jr., of Washington, D. C., and Bates, Teare & McBean, of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellee.
Before SIMONS, ALLEN, and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In an appeal from a decree dismissing the appellant's bill for infringement of Guyon Patent No. 1,971,560, because of invalidity,
It appearing to the court that the claims of the patent in suit, (1) disclose no invention; (2) are not sufficiently specific to comply with the requirements of § 4886 of the patent laws, 35 U.S.C.A. § 31; (3) involve merely a change of materials over articles disclosed in the prior art; and (4) disclose a mere aggregation of two old devices productive of no new joint function within the condemnation of Reckendorfer v. Faber, 92 U.S. 347, 357, 23 L.Ed. 719; Lincoln Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp., 303 U.S. 545, 549, 58 S.Ct. 662, 82 L.Ed. 1008; and Toledo Pressed Steel Co. v. Standard Parts, Inc., 307 U.S. 350, 356, 59 S.Ct. 897, 83 L.Ed. 1334; wherefore,
It is ordered that the decree be, and it is hereby, affirmed.