Case Name: John D. GENTRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-04-07
Citations: 652 So. 2d 518
Docket Number: No. 95-640
Parties: John D. GENTRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: COBB, PETERSON and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 652
Pages: 518–519

Head Matter:
John D. GENTRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 95-640.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
April 7, 1995.
John D. Gentry, Madison, pro se.
No appearance for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The summary denial of Gentry's 3.800(a) motion to correct an illegal sentence is affirmed without prejudice. Gentry alleges illegal consecutive habitual offender sentences under Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 278, 130 L.Ed.2d 195 (1994). The correct remedy to seek relief is a properly filed Rule 3.850 motion. Bunch v. State, 647 So.2d 1080 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Callaway v. State, 642 So.2d 636 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994) (question certified), review granted, (Fla. Feb. 15, 1995); Massey v. State, 648 So.2d 785 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).
AFFIRMED.
COBB, PETERSON and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.