Case Name: In re Anthony McQUEEN, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-11-25
Citations: 547 F. App'x 211
Docket Number: No. 13-2066
Parties: In re Anthony McQUEEN, Petitioner.
Judges: Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 547
Pages: 211–211

Head Matter:
In re Anthony McQUEEN, Petitioner.
No. 13-2066.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 21, 2013.
Decided: Nov. 25, 2013.
Anthony McQueen, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Anthony McQueen petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion filed in his 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp.2013) proceeding. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. After reviewing the district court's docket, we confirmed that the district court ruled on McQueen's motion on November 1, 2013. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.