Case Name: EMANUEL DREYFUS, RESPONDENT, v. LUTZ COMPANY, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1929-05-20
Citations: 106 N.J.L. 566
Docket Number: 
Parties: EMANUEL DREYFUS, RESPONDENT, v. LUTZ COMPANY, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 106
Pages: 566–566

Head Matter:
EMANUEL DREYFUS, RESPONDENT, v. LUTZ COMPANY, APPELLANT.
Submitted October 26, 1928
Decided May 20, 1929.
For the respondent, Mervin Herzfeld.
For the appellant, Kellogg & Chance.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court. '
For affirmance — Ti-ie Chancelloe, Chief Justice, Paekee, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Yah Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.