Case Name: Michael Lamont MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael MORGAN; Andrew Whitley; Melissa Bisette; Robert Evans; Brock & Scott, PLLC; Wilson County Courthouse; Sheriff Calvin Woodard, Sheriff, Wilson County; Derrick Creech, City Councilmen; Susan K. Farfour; Cardinal Group, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-04-03
Citations: 683 F. App'x 218
Docket Number: No. 16-2170
Parties: Michael Lamont MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael MORGAN; Andrew Whitley; Melissa Bisette; Robert Evans; Brock & Scott, PLLC; Wilson County Courthouse; Sheriff Calvin Woodard, Sheriff, Wilson County; Derrick Creech, City Councilmen; Susan K. Farfour; Cardinal Group, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 683
Pages: 218–219

Head Matter:
Michael Lamont MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael MORGAN; Andrew Whitley; Melissa Bisette; Robert Evans; Brock & Scott, PLLC; Wilson County Courthouse; Sheriff Calvin Woodard, Sheriff, Wilson County; Derrick Creech, City Councilmen; Susan K. Farfour; Cardinal Group, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-2170
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 30, 2017
Decided: April 3, 2017
* Mhhael Lamont Moore, Appellant Pro /Se.
Alan Marc Presel, Jolee M. Wortham, BROCK & SCOTT, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael Lamont Moore appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his eomplaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court, Moore v. Morgan, No. 5:16-cv-00244-FL (E.D.N.C. Sept. 26, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED