Case Name: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. PENNSYLVANIA GREYHOUND LINES, Inc., et al.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1937-06-15
Citations: 91 F.2d 178
Docket Number: No. 6007
Parties: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. PENNSYLVANIA GREYHOUND LINES, Inc., et al.
Judges: Before BUFFINGTON and BIGGS, Circuit Judges, and DICKINSON, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 91
Pages: 178–182

Head Matter:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. PENNSYLVANIA GREYHOUND LINES, Inc., et al.
No. 6007.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
June 15, 1937.
Robert B. Watts, Charles Fahy, Thomas I. Emerson, Philip Levy, and Stanley S. Surrey, all of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
Ivan Bowen, of Minneapolis, Minn., and Charles H. Young, of New Castle, Pa. (M. H. Boutelle, of Minneapolis, Minn., of counsel), for respondents.
Before BUFFINGTON and BIGGS, Circuit Judges, and DICKINSON, District Judge.

Opinion:
BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.
The proposed order of the National Labor Relations Board, so far as clauses 1, 2, 3, and 5 are concerned, is approved. Sections (a) and (b) of clause 4 are approved, but approval is withheld from sections (c) and (d) of said clause, which read:
"(c) Withdraw all recognition from the Employees Association of the Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc., as representative of their employees, including the employees of the Pennsylvania Greyhound System, for the purpose of dealing with respondents concerning grievances, labor disputes, wages, rates of pay, hours of employment, or conditions of work;
"(d) Post notices in conspicuous places in all of the places of business wherein their employees, including employees of the Pennsylvania Greyhound System, are engaged, stating that said Association is so disestablished and that respondents will refrain from any such recognition thereof."
The majority of the court feels that sections (c) and (d) should not be enforced because there is no warrant in the act for such action. No election has been held; the union enjoined has not been notified or heard, but, in advance of an election by the men, said union is for all practical purposes outlawed, and that without hearing.