Case Name: State of Florida, ex rel. Frank Williams, Relator, v. H. M. Prescott, Sheriff, Walton County, Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1933-05-18
Citations: 110 Fla. 261
Docket Number: 
Parties: State of Florida, ex rel. Frank Williams, Relator, v. H. M. Prescott, Sheriff, Walton County, Florida, Respondent.
Judges: Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, and Buford, J. J., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 110
Pages: 261–262

Head Matter:
State of Florida, ex rel. Frank Williams, Relator, v. H. M. Prescott, Sheriff, Walton County, Florida, Respondent.
148 So. 533.
Opinion filed May 18, 1933.
W. W. Flournoy, for Relator;
Cary D. Landis, Attorney General, and Roy Campbell, Assistant, for Defendant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This case is before the Court on application for writ of habeas corpus, the writ which issued pursuant thereto and the return of the respondent.
The record shows that prior to the application for writ of habeas corpus in this Court the petitioner had applied for and procured issuance of a writ of habeas corpus before the Honorable A. G. Campbell, Judge of the First Judicial Circuit of Florida. That upon hearing, after return, the said Judge of the Circuit Court made an order remanding petitioner to the custody of the sheriff.
It further appears from the record that in that case the identical questions and parties were involved which are involved here. There was no writ of error taken to the judgment in that behalf.
Circuit Courts and the Supreme Court of Florida, or any Justice thereof, have concurrent jurisdiction in original habeas corpus proceedings. The judgment of the Circuit Court in such cases becomes absolute, unless reviewed on writ of error by the appellate court and such judgment becomes res adjudicata as to questions of law involved in that case. Therefore, the writ of habeas corpus heretofore issued by a Justice of this Court should be quashed and the petitioner remanded to execute the judgment of the Circuit Court heretofore entered and above referred to. See State ex rel. Davis v. Hardie, 108 Fla. 133, 146 So. 97; Sec. 5444 C. G. L. (3580) R. G. S.
It is so ordered.
Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, and Buford, J. J., concur.