Case Name: Flowers v. Haskins, Supt., London Correctional Institution
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1971-03-03
Citations: 25 Ohio St. 2d 186
Docket Number: No. 70-717
Parties: Flowers v. Haskins, Supt., London Correctional Institution.
Judges: SCHNEIDER, HERBERT, CORRIGAN, StERN and LeACH, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Second Series
Volume: 25
Pages: 186–187

Head Matter:
Flowers v. Haskins, Supt., London Correctional Institution.
(No. 70-717
Decided March 3, 1971.)
Mr. Hobart Flowers, in propria persona.
Mr. Paul W. Broivn, attorney general, and Mr. James L. Hoover, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Petitioner is presently in custody pursuant to two sentences imposed on him following convictions for two separate crimes. Even assuming the validity of petitioner's contention concerning his 1968 conviction, he is still properly incarcerated on his sentence op. his 1967 conviction. He is not, therefore, entitled to release in habeas corpus. Ball v. Maxwell (1965), 1 Ohio St. 2d 77.
Petitioner has an available remedy by postconviction proceedings for contesting the validity of his 1968 conviction for breaking and entering an inhabited dwelling in the night season.
Petitioner remanded to custody.
SCHNEIDER, HERBERT, CORRIGAN, StERN and LeACH, JJ., concur.
O'Neill, C. J., and Duncan, J., dissent.