Case Name: Oscar Fried, Respondent, v. New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1920-04-20
Citations: 228 N.Y. 611
Docket Number: 
Parties: Oscar Fried, Respondent, v. New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 228
Pages: 611–611

Head Matter:
Oscar Fried, Respondent, v. New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company, Appellant.
Reported below, 183 App. Div. 115.
(Argued April 12, 1920;
decided April 20, 1920.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered May 10, 1918, affirming certain interlocutory orders made in an action to recover for personal injuries.
The motion was made upon the ground that the orders were discretionary and not appealable, without permission, to the Court of Appeals.
Edgar T. Brackett for motion.
William Rand opposed.

Opinion:
Motion denied, without costs, and without prejudice to consideration on argument of appeal of the question whether the order specified may be reviewed on appeal from the judgment herein.