Case Name: MCORP FINANCIAL, INC., MCorp Mgt. and MCorp., Plaintiffs-Appellees, and Official Creditors' Committee of MCorp, MCorp Financial, Inc., and MCorp Mgt., Intervenors-Appellees, v. BOARD OF GOVERNORS FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM OF the UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1992-04-01
Citations: 958 F.2d 615
Docket Number: No. 89-2816
Parties: MCORP FINANCIAL, INC., MCorp Mgt. and MCorp., Plaintiffs-Appellees, and Official Creditors’ Committee of MCorp, MCorp Financial, Inc., and MCorp Mgt., Intervenors-Appellees, v. BOARD OF GOVERNORS FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM OF the UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, WILLIAMS and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 958
Pages: 615–616

Head Matter:
MCORP FINANCIAL, INC., MCorp Mgt. and MCorp., Plaintiffs-Appellees, and Official Creditors’ Committee of MCorp, MCorp Financial, Inc., and MCorp Mgt., Intervenors-Appellees, v. BOARD OF GOVERNORS FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM OF the UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 89-2816.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 1, 1992.
Jeffrey Clair, William Kanter, Asst. At-tys. Gen., Dept, of Justice, Civ. Div./Appellate Staff, Washington, D.C., for defendant-appellant.
Harvey R. Miller, Alan B. Miller, D.J. Baker, Weil, Gotshal & Manges, New York City, Howard N. Cayne, Arnold & Porter, Washington, D.C., for MCorp, et al.
John P. Lynch, Deborah Corthier Paskin, Latham & Watkins, Chicago, Ill., Robert J. Rosenberg, Latham & Watkins, New York City, for Official Creditors, et al.

Opinion:
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, WILLIAMS and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
This case has been remanded to us by the Supreme Court, 112 S.Ct. 459, 116 L.Ed.2d 358 (1991), for disposition consistent with its opinion. The Court concluded that the district court was without jurisdiction to entertain this suit. Accordingly, the injunction entered by the district court is vacated, and the action dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.