Case Name: KELLOGG against FREEMAN
Court: New York City Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1885-05
Citations: 2 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 147
Docket Number: 
Parties: KELLOGG against FREEMAN.
Judges: 
Reporter: City Court Reports
Volume: 2
Pages: 147–148

Head Matter:
City Court.
Special Term,
May, 1885.
KELLOGG against FREEMAN.
An affidavit in supplementary proceedings should allege that the defendant is a resident or has a place of business within the county—either is sufficient. If the plaintiff proceeds on both grounds he must do so in the conjunctive.

Opinion:
McAdam, Ch. J.
An affidavit in supplementary proceedings which follows the alternative wording of the statute,—that the defendant is a resident or has a place of business within the county, is not sufficient (1 Code Rep. 38). It should allege either " that the defendant is a resident," or " that he has a place of business with the county," for either will suffice. If it be true that the defendant is a resident and also has a place of business within the county, the fact ought to be alleged in the conjunctive, in order to satisfy the rules of practice.
Motion to vacate order granted, without costs.