Case Name: In re GOFF BUILDING, LLC, Debtor. Jerry A. Berardi; Betty J. Berardi, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and Goff Building, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Norwest Bank, Minnesota, NA, Assignee of Merrill Lynch Credit Corporation; Ameresco Management, Incorporated; Robert W. Dinsmore, substitute trustee, Defendants-Appellees, and United States Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of West Virginia, Party in Interest-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-08-25
Citations: 73 F. App'x 593
Docket Number: No. 03-1184
Parties: In re GOFF BUILDING, LLC, Debtor. Jerry A. Berardi; Betty J. Berardi, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and Goff Building, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Norwest Bank, Minnesota, NA, Assignee of Merrill Lynch Credit Corporation; Ameresco Management, Incorporated; Robert W. Dinsmore, substitute trustee, Defendants-Appellees, and United States Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of West Virginia, Party in Interest-Appellee.
Judges: Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Bankruptcy Reporter
Volume: 300
Pages: 593–594

Head Matter:
In re GOFF BUILDING, LLC, Debtor. Jerry A. Berardi; Betty J. Berardi, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and Goff Building, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Norwest Bank, Minnesota, NA, Assignee of Merrill Lynch Credit Corporation; Ameresco Management, Incorporated; Robert W. Dinsmore, substitute trustee, Defendants-Appellees, and United States Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of West Virginia, Party in Interest-Appellee.
No. 03-1184.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 31, 2003.
Decided Aug. 25, 2003.
Brent E. Beveridge, Beveridge Law Offices, Fairmont, West Virginia, for Appellants. Julia A. Chincheck, Eric L. Calvert, Bowles, Rice, McDavid, Graff & Love, P.L.L.C., Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
PER CURIAM.
Jerry A. Berardi and Betty J. Berardi appeal from the district court's order affirming the bankruptcy court's orders denying their motion to remand their case back to the state court and denying their motion for leave to amend their complaint. We have reviewed the parties' briefs, the joint appendix and supplement to the joint appendix, and the lower courts' opinions and find no abuse of discretion and no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Berardi v. Norwest Bank Minn., NA, Nos. CA-2-50-1; BK-99-12207; AP-00-1195 (N.D.W Va. Jan. 23, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.