Case Name: F. A. HAYES v. CAROLINA AUTO SUPPLY HOUSE, Incorporated
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 1932-11-02
Citations: 203 N.C. 850
Docket Number: 
Parties: F. A. HAYES v. CAROLINA AUTO SUPPLY HOUSE, Incorporated.
Judges: 
Reporter: North Carolina Reports
Volume: 203
Pages: 850–850

Head Matter:
F. A. HAYES v. CAROLINA AUTO SUPPLY HOUSE, Incorporated.
(Filed 2 November, 1932.)
Appeal by defendant from Daniels, J., at March Term, 1932, of WayNE.
Civil action to recover for alleged breach of exclusive right, granted the plaintiff by the defendant, to distribute Pennzoil products in certain counties of North Carolina.
From a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff, the defendant appeals, assigning errors.
B. F. Aycoch and Kenneth G. Boyall for plaintiff.
E. McA. Currie and Langston, Allen & Taylor for defendant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
On controverted issues of fact, involving different understanding and opposite contentions of the parties, the jury has found in favor of the plaintiff. A careful perusal of the record leaves us with the impression that the case has been tried in substantial conformity to the principles of law applicable and the authoritative decisions on the questions raised by the defendant's 207 exceptions and assignments of error. It is not to be expected that we should discuss the assignments seriatim, for, to do so, would require an opinion of intolerable length. S. v. Lea, ante, 13.
No error.