Case Name: Bertrand E. Moebus, Appellant, v. Paul Tishman Co,, Inc., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1959-02-26
Citations: 5 N.Y.2d 945
Docket Number: 
Parties: Bertrand E. Moebus, Appellant, v. Paul Tishman Co,, Inc., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 5
Pages: 945–945

Head Matter:
Bertrand E. Moebus, Appellant, v. Paul Tishman Co,, Inc., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.
Argued January 21, 1959;
decided February 26, 1959.
John J. Tomich, Joseph Dean Edwards, Jacques Smit, Dominic Morabito and Olin S. Nye for appellant.
John Nielsen and John P. Smith for Paul Tishman Co., Inc., and another, respondents.
Richard E. Shandell and Desmond T. Barry for Horn Construction Co., respondent.

Opinion:
Appeal dismissed, with costs, upon the ground that the sole question presented involves a nonreviewable exercise of discretion (Quick Service Novelty Corp. v. Scharf, 4 N Y 2d 799; Feingold v. City of New York, 4 N Y 2d 783). No opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Conwat and Judges Desmond, Dte, Fuld, Froessel, Van Yoorhis and Burke.