Case Name: HAAS et al., Respondents, v. HENDRICKS, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1899-10-25
Citations: 60 N.Y.S. 1139
Docket Number: 
Parties: HAAS et al., Respondents, v. HENDRICKS, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 60
Pages: 1139–1139

Head Matter:
HAAS et al., Respondents, v. HENDRICKS, Appellant.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
October 25, 1899.)
Action by Samuel Haas and others against Albert Hendricks. From a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, defendant appeals.
Reversed.
Cardozo Bros., for appellant.
Maurice Meyer, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The record failing to show that the defendant resides within the jurisdiction of the municipal court, the judgment must be reversed. Tyroler v. Gummersbach, 28 Mise. Rep. 151, 59 N. Y. Supp. 266, 319. Judgment reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.