Case Name: R. J. SHEA and M. P. SHEA, Doing Business as T. J. SHEA'S SONS COMPANY, Appellants, v. S. B. WOOD, Appellee
Court: Arizona Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Arizona
Decision Date: 1921-03-30
Citations: 22 Ariz. 224
Docket Number: Civil No. 1885
Parties: R. J. SHEA and M. P. SHEA, Doing Business as T. J. SHEA’S SONS COMPANY, Appellants, v. S. B. WOOD, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Arizona Reports
Volume: 22
Pages: 224–224

Head Matter:
[Civil No. 1885.
Filed March 30, 1921.]
[196 Pac. 419.]
R. J. SHEA and M. P. SHEA, Doing Business as T. J. SHEA’S SONS COMPANY, Appellants, v. S. B. WOOD, Appellee.
Appeal and Error — Dismissed When Eecord is not Authenticated. Where the record on the second appeal of a case contained a number of papers not certified by the clerk nor approved by the trial judge, and so-called transcript of record is not certified or approved, and, even if such omissions could be overlooked, did not show whether the ease was retried upon the same pleadings as in the first trial, or whether different issues were formed and tried, the appeal must be dismissed.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Maricopa. R. C. Stanford, Judge.
Appeal dismissed.
Messrs. Cox & Moore, for Appellants.
Messrs. Davis & Gloodman, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
There is no authenticated record in this case. We find in the files a number of papers that may or may not properly belong in the case. They have neither the certification of the clerk nor the approval of the trial judge. The same is true of what is indorsed as "Transcript of the Record."
This is the second time the case has been appealed here (20 Ariz. 437, 181 Pac. 369); and, even if we were disposed to overlook the fatal omissions noted, we cannot tell from what we have before us whether the case was retried upon the same pleadings as in the first trial, or whether different issues were formed and tried.
The order is that .the case be dismissed.