Case Name: Egger v. Huff
Court: Appellate Court of Indiana
Jurisdiction: Indiana
Decision Date: 1948-10-05
Citations: 118 Ind. App. 461
Docket Number: No. 17,768
Parties: Egger v. Huff
Judges: 
Reporter: Indiana Court of Appeals Reports
Volume: 118
Pages: 461–462

Head Matter:
Egger v. Huff
[No. 17,768.
Filed October 5, 1948.]
Albert B. Chipman, of Plymouth, and Roscoe L. Egger, of Bremen, attorneys for appellant.
Tom R. Huff, of Plymouth, attorney for appellee.

Opinion:
FLANAGAN, J.
Appellant's brief presents no question for review for the following reasons:
1. Under the heading "Errors relied upon for reversal," no errors are set forth except such as would be grounds for a new trial, but there is nothing in the brief to inform the court whether there was a motion for a new trial or whether appellant is attempting to assign these errors independently.
2. There is no attempt to set forth a "concise statement of so much of the record as fully presents every error and exception relied upon," as required by Rule 2-17 of the Rules of the Supreme Court.
3. None of appellant's propositions or points are supported by authority as required by the above rule.
Judgment affirmed.
NOTE. — Reported in 81 N. E. 2d 378.