Case Name: Westwood Associates et al., Appellants, v. Deluxe General, Incorporated, Respondent, et al., Defendants
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1981-03-24
Citations: 53 N.Y.2d 618
Docket Number: 
Parties: Westwood Associates et al., Appellants, v Deluxe General, Incorporated, Respondent, et al., Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 53
Pages: 618–619

Head Matter:
Westwood Associates et al., Appellants, v Deluxe General, Incorporated, Respondent, et al., Defendants.
Argued February 9,1981;
decided March 24, 1981
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Ephraim London and William S. Hochenberg for appellants.
Margaret Blair Soyster, Guy C. Quinlan and William R. Henrich for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
The Appellate Division did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the action on grounds of forum non conveniens. That all of the parties to the action may have been New York residents is not dispositive, since the residence of the parties in New York is but one factor to be considered in determining whether an action should be dismissed pursuant to CPLR 327 (see Silver v Great Amer. Ins. Co., 29 NY2d 356; see, generally, Irrigation & Ind. Dev. Corp. v Indag, S. A., 37 NY2d 522).
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.