Case Name: TAMBLIN et al., Respondents, v. DONELY et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1907-10-02
Citations: 106 N.Y.S. 1147
Docket Number: 
Parties: TAMBLIN et al., Respondents, v. DONELY et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 106
Pages: 1147–1147

Head Matter:
TAMBLIN et al., Respondents, v. DONELY et al., Appellants.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
October 2, 1907.)
Action by James I. Tamblin and others against Frank Donely and others.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Motion to dismiss appeal as to John F. Donely and Frank Donely denied, with §10 costs and disbursements. Held that, in order to raise on the merits the question here presented, the attorneys for the respondents should have promptly notified the attorney for the appellants that he refused to recognize his notice of appeal for all defendants.