Case Name: James O. McNABB, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-11-17
Citations: 552 So. 2d 313
Docket Number: No. 88-02228
Parties: James O. McNABB, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: DANAHY, A.C.J., and HALL and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 552
Pages: 313–314

Head Matter:
James O. McNABB, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 88-02228.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Nov. 17, 1989.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and D.P. Chanco, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Michele Taylor, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellant, James 0. McNabb, raises two issues. His first issue is without merit as this court has previously held that probation can be imposed consecutively to community control. Skeens v. State, 542 So.2d 436 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).
For his second issue, the defendant contends, and the state agrees, that the trial court erred by imposing court costs without adequate notice or an opportunity to object as required by Wood v. State, 544 So.2d 1004 (Fla.1989) and Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984). Accordingly, we strike the court costs without prejudice to the state seeking to have them reimposed after proper notice.
DANAHY, A.C.J., and HALL and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.