Case Name: The Stern Furniture Co., Appellee, v. Stern et al., Appellants
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1949-07-20
Citations: 152 Ohio St. 191
Docket Number: No. 31849
Parties: The Stern Furniture Co., Appellee, v. Stern et al., Appellants.
Judges: Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Stewart, Turner and Taet, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, New Service
Volume: 152
Pages: 191–193

Head Matter:
The Stern Furniture Co., Appellee, v. Stern et al., Appellants.
(No. 31849
Decided July 20, 1949.)
Mr. Sidney N. Weitz, for appellee.
Mr. Gabriel Leeb, for appellants.

Opinion:
By the Court.
A proceeding in contempt, instituted in the Court of Appeals for the violation of its former order, is a case originating in the Court of Appeals within the meaning of Section 2, Article IV of the Constitution, and an appeal as of right may prop erly be filed in this court. Cady v. Cleveland Worsted Mills Co., 126 Ohio St., 171, 184 N. E., 511.
The Court of Appeals found there had been specific violations of its decree in injunction. From an examination of the record we are of the opinion that the finding in contempt was warranted.
The motion to dismiss the appeal is overruled and the judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Stewart, Turner and Taet, JJ., concur.