Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joseph E. Wigfall, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1994-09-30
Citations: 207 A.D.2d 973
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph E. Wigfall, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 207
Pages: 973–973

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph E. Wigfall, Appellant.
[617 NYS2d 672]

Opinion:
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The circumstantial evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Kennedy, 47 NY2d 196, 203), is sufficient to support defendant's conviction of attempted arson in the first degree (Penal Law § 110.00, 150.20). We further conclude that the sentence is neither harsh nor excessive. Finally, defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved for review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]), and we decline to review them as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Cunningham, J.—Attempted Arson, 1st Degree.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Balio, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.