Case Name: Walter Barth, Respondent, v. Louis Drago, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1934-06
Citations: 242 A.D. 631
Docket Number: 
Parties: Walter Barth, Respondent, v. Louis Drago, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 242
Pages: 631–631

Head Matter:
Walter Barth, Respondent, v. Louis Drago, Appellant.

Opinion:
Judgment reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. The court erred in charging the jury that there was no question with respect to whether or not the plaintiff had a broken nose. There was a conflict of evidence on this point, and the court's charge was an invasion of the jury's function in this respect. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.