Case Name: MARIA RIBEIRO COSTA-HUGHES, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. MULLEN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1993-10-28
Citations: 134 N.J. 187
Docket Number: 
Parties: MARIA RIBEIRO COSTA-HUGHES, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. MULLEN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 134
Pages: 187–187

Head Matter:
631 A.2d 1245
MARIA RIBEIRO COSTA-HUGHES, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. MULLEN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Argued September 14, 1993 —
Decided October 28, 1993.
Mark B. Zirulnik argued the cause for appellant (Isaacson, Dougherty & Zirulnik, attorneys; Louis M. Masucci, Jr., on the brief).
Robert A Greenberg argued the cause for respondent (Ravich, Roster, Tobin, Oleckna, Reitman & Greenstein, attorneys).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion for the Appellate Division, reported at 267 N.J.Super. 439, 631 A.2d 1245 (1992).