Case Name: ASPHALT PAVING & CONTRACTING CO. v. CITY OF NEW YORK
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1912-03-22
Citations: 134 N.Y.S. 442
Docket Number: No. 1
Parties: ASPHALT PAVING & CONTRACTING CO. v. CITY OF NEW YORK.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 134
Pages: 442–443

Head Matter:
ASPHALT PAVING & CONTRACTING CO. v. CITY OF NEW YORK.
(No. 1.)
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
March 22, 1912.)
Appeal from Trial Term, New York County.
Action by the Asphalt Paving & Contracting Company against the City of New York. From a judgment' for plaintiff and an order ■denying its motion for new trial, defendant appeals. Affirmed.
See, also, 134 N. Y. Supp. 439.
Argued before INGRAHAM, P. J., and McLAUGHLIN, LAUGH-LIN, MILLER, and DOWLING, JJ.
Terence Farley, for appellant.
L. Laflin'Kellogg, for respondent.

Opinion:
DOWLING, J.
The judgment and order appealed from will be affirmed, with costs, upon the grounds stated in the opinion in action No. 2, between the same parties (134 N. Y. Supp. 433) and upon the further ground that under the amended pleadings in this action defendant claimed that it had given notice to make the repairs in question to the Barber Asphalt Company as assignee of the Warren-Scharf Asphalt Paving Company. It was the defendant's contention that the Barber Company was acting as such assignee, but it utterly failed to sustain its contention by proof, and the verdict was therefore properly directed.
The judgment and order appealed from are therefore affirmed, with costs to respondent.
INGRAHAM, P. J" and McLAUGHLIN and MILLER, JJ., concur.