Case Name: CHARLES H. HALL, Resp't, v. ANDREW ARMANDO, App'lt
Court: New York Court of Common Pleas
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1888-05-07
Citations: 16 N.Y. St. Rep. 1017
Docket Number: 
Parties: CHARLES H. HALL, Resp’t, v. ANDREW ARMANDO, App’lt.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 16
Pages: 1017–1017

Head Matter:
CHARLES H. HALL, Resp’t, v. ANDREW ARMANDO, App’lt.
Counterclaim—When properly disregarded.
E Mehling, for resp’t; M. Bogersderfer, for app’lt.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The action in the fourth district court being for the claim and delivery of personal property, the counterclaim for work, labor and services was properly disregarded, as another action can be brought for that counterclaim.
We cannot see that any error was committed by the justice, in the trial, and the judgment should, therefore, be affirmed, with costs.