Case Name: Joseph M. RUSSELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dennis J. SMITH, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-01-21
Citations: 308 F. App'x 665
Docket Number: No. 08-2266
Parties: Joseph M. RUSSELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dennis J. SMITH, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 308
Pages: 665–666

Head Matter:
Joseph M. RUSSELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dennis J. SMITH, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 08-2266.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 15, 2009.
Decided: Jan. 21, 2009.
Joseph M. Russell, Appellant Pro Se. Christina Nicole Gilliam, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Ap-pellee.
Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Joseph M. Russell appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Russell v. Smith, No. 4:08-cv-00070-JBF-JEB (E.D.Va. Oct. 6, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.