Case Name: L. B. CLARK v. S. S. SALBERG
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1923-01-15
Citations: 1 Ohio Law Abs. 202
Docket Number: No. 4114
Parties: L. B. CLARK v. S. S. SALBERG
Judges: 
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 1
Pages: 202–202

Head Matter:
No. 152
L. B. CLARK v. S. S. SALBERG
Ohio Court of Appeals, Cuyahoga County
No. 4114,
Jan. 15, 1923
This Opinion Has Been Published in The Abstract Only
CONFIDENTIAL RELATION
Error from Cleveland Municpal Court
Attorneys — D. M. Balder, for Clark; F. C. Printy, for Salberg.

Opinion:
EPITOMIZED OPINION
PER CURIAM:
This case inyolves the right of the plaintff to recover compensation for negotiating a lease between the lessor and lessee. On the trial testimony developed the fact that the plaintiff was acting as the agent of both the lessor and lessee, the fact that he was acting as agent for the lessee not having been disclosed to the lessor.
Held:
He could not recover, if he were acting for both parties without making full disclosure of the same.