Case Name: Reuben D. PLASENCIA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1984-01-17
Citations: 443 So. 2d 1065
Docket Number: No. 83-297
Parties: Reuben D. PLASENCIA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before HENDRY, HUBBART and BAS-KIN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 443
Pages: 1065–1065

Head Matter:
Reuben D. PLASENCIA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 83-297.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan. 17, 1984.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Arthur L. Rothenberg, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Michael J. Neimand, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before HENDRY, HUBBART and BAS-KIN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellant was charged by information with second degree murder. A jury found him guilty as charged. He was sentenced to fifteen years in the state prison.
The sole point raised by appellant in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying appellant's motions for directed verdict at the conclusion of the state's case and for judgment of acquittal because of insufficiency of the evidence.
After carefully considering the point on appeal in the light of the record and briefs, we have concluded that no reversible error has been demonstrated. See: Pressley v. State, 395 So.2d 1175 (Fla. 3d DCA), pet for rev. denied, 407 So.2d 1105 (Fla.1981); Everett v. State, 339 So.2d 704 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Bolin v. State, 297 So.2d 317 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 304 So.2d 452 (Fla.1974); Gil v. State, 266 So.2d 43 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 271 So.2d 139 (Fla. 1972).
Therefore the judgment and sentence are affirmed.
Affirmed.