Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Dagoberto GONZALES-CANO, also known as Dagoberto Gonzalez-Cano, also known as Jose Martinez-Arias, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-03-27
Citations: 598 F. App'x 327
Docket Number: No. 14-40705
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Dagoberto GONZALES-CANO, also known as Dagoberto Gonzalez-Cano, also known as Jose Martinez-Arias, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before PRADO, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 598
Pages: 327–327

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Dagoberto GONZALES-CANO, also known as Dagoberto Gonzalez-Cano, also known as Jose Martinez-Arias, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 14-40705
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 27, 2015.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Scott Andrew Martin, Assistant Federal Public Defender, H. Michael Soko-low, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before PRADO, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Dagoberto Gonzales-Cano has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Gonzales-Cano has not filed a response.
We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th CiR. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.