Case Name: H. E. Walter v. William Logan et al.
Court: Kansas Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Kansas
Decision Date: 1904-05-07
Citations: 69 Kan. 851
Docket Number: No. 13,592
Parties: H. E. Walter v. William Logan et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Kansas Reports
Volume: 69
Pages: 851–851

Head Matter:
H. E. Walter v. William Logan et al.
No. 13,592.
(76 Pac. 1131.)
Error from Cherokee, district court; A. H. Skidmore, judge.
Opinion filed May 7, 1904.
Reversed.
W. B. Cowley, and A. 8. Dennison, for plaintiff in error.
Forhner de Forhner, and Blue c& Hamilton, for defendants in error.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
The reply of H. E. Walter to the amended.' answer of Oliver P. and S. F. Hill was sufficiently verified to deny any appointment or authority alleged in the • answer. (Gibson v. Shorb, 7 Kan. App. 732, 52 Pac. 579.)
We have read the evidence in the case and do not find that, in legal effect, it differs materially from the evidence introduced on the former trial, which was held insufficient to support a judgment for defendants below. (Walter v. Logan, 63 Kan. 193, 65 Pac. 225.)
The judgment will be reversed and a new trial granted.