Case Name: Felipe A. RUIZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1983-11-22
Citations: 441 So. 2d 1152
Docket Number: No. 82-2393
Parties: Felipe A. RUIZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before HENDRY, BARKDULL and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 441
Pages: 1152–1152

Head Matter:
Felipe A. RUIZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 82-2393.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 22, 1983.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Beth C. Weitzner, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Calianne P. Lantz, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before HENDRY, BARKDULL and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the revocation of a probation upon the state showing of a subsequent unrelated conviction entered pursuant to a nolo contendere plea relying upon the reasoning contained in Bradford v. State, 435 So.2d 962 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); and Maselli v. State, 425 So.2d 176 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1983), recognizing that these opinions are in conflict with Donaldson v. State, 407 So.2d 623 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981) (Cobb, J., dissenting).
Affirmed.