Case Name: Steven VANDESANDE, Appellant, v. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2017-02-15
Citations: 211 So. 3d 1086
Docket Number: No. 3D15-2038
Parties: Steven VANDESANDE, Appellant, v. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, Appellee.
Judges: Before SUAREZ, C.J. and SALTER and SCALES, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 211
Pages: 1086–1086

Head Matter:
Steven VANDESANDE, Appellant, v. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, Appellee.
No. 3D15-2038
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Opinion filed February 15, 2017
Steven Vandesande, in proper person.
Abigail Price-Williams, Miami-Dade County Attorney, and William X. Candela, Assistant County Attorney, for appellee.
Before SUAREZ, C.J. and SALTER and SCALES, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court's entry of summary judgment on Count I of Appellant Steven Vandesande's Third Amended Complaint. Peeples v. Peeples, 871 So.2d 945 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (barring former husband's supplemental petition on the basis of res judicata).
We also affirm the trial court's directed verdict on the remaining counts of Vande-sande's Third Amended Complaint. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (holding that "[wjithout a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.").
Affirmed.