Case Name: In re James Keith ROSE, M.D.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 2002-05-02
Citations: 82 S.W.3d 523
Docket Number: 
Parties: In re James Keith ROSE, M.D.
Judges: Before Chief Justice VALDEZ and Justices DORSEY and RODRIGUEZ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 82
Pages: 523–524

Head Matter:
In re James Keith ROSE, M.D.
No. 13-02-162-CV.
Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi.
May 2, 2002.
John S. Warren, Warren, Drugan & Barrows, Corpus Christi, for relator.
Arnold Gonzales, Jr., The Kleberg Law Firm, Pete E. Avots, Wood, Boykin & Wolter, Corpus Christi, for real parties in interest.
Before Chief Justice VALDEZ and Justices DORSEY and RODRIGUEZ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on March 20, 2002. The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus and real parties' responses, is of the opinion that said petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. The relator's petition for writ of mandamus is hereby DENIED.
Dissenting Opinion by Justice DORSEY.