Case Name: CORCEL CORPORATION, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC., A Virginia Corporation, Line-Tec, Inc., A Florida Corporation, AKA Services, Inc., A Florida Corporation, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-01-30
Citations: 674 F. App'x 972
Docket Number: No. 15-15315 Non-Argument Calendar
Parties: CORCEL CORPORATION, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC., A Virginia Corporation, Line-Tec, Inc., A Florida Corporation, AKA Services, Inc., A Florida Corporation, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before TJOFLAT, HULL and WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 674
Pages: 972–973

Head Matter:
CORCEL CORPORATION, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC., A Virginia Corporation, Line-Tec, Inc., A Florida Corporation, AKA Services, Inc., A Florida Corporation, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15-15315 Non-Argument Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Filed (January 30, 2017)
Ricardo Corona, Nina Tarafa, Corona Law Firm, PA, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant
Christopher N. Bellows, Holland & Knight, LLP, Miami, FL, Alison K. Brown, Eleni Sevasti Kastrenakes, William Newton Shepherd, Seth Jason Weiner, Matthew Z. Zimmerman, Holland & Knight, LLP, West Palm Beach, FL, for Defendant-Appellee Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.
Leonard Feuer, Leonard Feuer, PA, West Palm Beach, FL, for Defendant-Ap-pellee Line-Tec, Inc.
Chase A. Berger, Laura Elizabeth Burgess, Berger Firm, PA, Hollywood, FL, for Defendant-Appellee AKA Services, Inc.
Before TJOFLAT, HULL and WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
After review and careful consideration of the parties' briefs and the record, we affirm the district court's order granting Defendants-Appellees' motions for summary judgment, which concluded that the statute of limitations barred Plaintiff-Appellant's civil Racketeer Influence and Corrupt Organizations Act claims, 18 U.S.C. § 1961-1968. The parties are already familiar with the facts and procedural history, and we •affirm for the reasons outlined in the district court's thorough and well-reasoned order dated March 8, 2016.
AFFIRMED.