Case Name: PAUL CERMAK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THE HERTZ CORPORATION, ETC., DEFENDANT, AND AETNA METALCRAFT, INC., ETC., AND OLINTO J. DIGEORGE, JOINTLY, ETC., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1959-01-19
Citations: 28 N.J. 568
Docket Number: 
Parties: PAUL CERMAK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THE HERTZ CORPORATION, ETC., DEFENDANT, AND AETNA METALCRAFT, INC., ETC., AND OLINTO J. DIGEORGE, JOINTLY, ETC., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 28
Pages: 568–576

Head Matter:
PAUL CERMAK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THE HERTZ CORPORATION, ETC., DEFENDANT, AND AETNA METALCRAFT, INC., ETC., AND OLINTO J. DIGEORGE, JOINTLY, ETC., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Argued December 16, 1958
Decided January 19, 1959.
Mr. John B. Hughes argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. Schreiber, Lancaster & Demos, attorneys).
Mr. Philip L. Nadler argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. Pasquale Pipi and Messrs. Gross & Garfield, attorneys; Mr. Isaac Gross and Mr. Vidor P. Mullica, on the brief).

Opinion:
Pee Cueiam.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the court below.