Case Name: STONE AND STONE PENSION PLAN ET AL. v. PATRICIA MCKENNA ET AL.
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1996-03-12
Citations: 40 Conn. App. 936
Docket Number: 14399
Parties: STONE AND STONE PENSION PLAN ET AL. v. PATRICIA MCKENNA ET AL.
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Appellate Reports
Volume: 40
Pages: 936–936

Head Matter:
STONE AND STONE PENSION PLAN ET AL. v. PATRICIA MCKENNA ET AL.
(14399)
Landau, Schaller and Hennessy, Js.
Argued February 15
decision released, March 12, 1996
Ahmed A. Dadi, pro se, with whom was Patricia McKenna, pro se, the appellants (defendants).
David M. ReiUy, with whom, on the brief, was Francis J. Doherty, for the appellees (plaintiffs).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed, and the case is remanded for the purpose of setting new law days.