Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ramon VALLE-REGALADO, also known as Ramon Regalado Valle, also known as Castro Regalado, also known as Heriberto Castro-Valle, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-10-01
Citations: 619 F. App'x 365
Docket Number: No. 15-20051
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ramon VALLE-REGALADO, also known as Ramon Regalado Valle, also known as Castro Regalado, also known as Heriberto Castro-Valle, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before DAVIS, JONES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 619
Pages: 365–365

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ramon VALLE-REGALADO, also known as Ramon Regalado Valle, also known as Castro Regalado, also known as Heriberto Castro-Valle, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-20051
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Oct. 1, 2015.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Margaret Christina Ling, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public. Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before DAVIS, JONES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ramon Valle-Regalado has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Valle-Regalado has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.