Case Name: Leslie Hobby et al. v. Robert S. Feldman et al.
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1984-11-13
Citations: 2 Conn. App. 696
Docket Number: 2268
Parties: Leslie Hobby et al. v. Robert S. Feldman et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Appellate Reports
Volume: 2
Pages: 696–697

Head Matter:
Leslie Hobby et al. v. Robert S. Feldman et al.
(2268)
Dupont, Acting C.P.J., Borden and Daly, Js.
Argued October 5
decision released November 13, 1984
Jackson T. King, Jr., for the appellants (plaintiffs).
Leonard B. Berkman, for the appellees (defendants).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The plaintiffs, by their complaint, sought a judgment declaring invalid the mortgage held by the defendants on the real property of the plaintiffs. The defendants, by their counterclaim, sought damages from the plaintiffs for failure to pay amounts due under an agreement. The agreement created the obligation for which the mortgage held by the defendants was security. The trial court issued a factually detailed memorandum of decision and rendered judgment for the defendants on the complaint and on the counterclaim. We have carefully considered the claims of error of the plaintiffs on appeal and find them to be without merit. They amount to an attempt to persuade us to retry the facts found by the trial court, which are amply supported by the evidence and are not clearly erroneous.
There is no error.
This appeal, originally filed in the Supreme Court, was transferred to this court. Public Acts, Spec. Sess., June, 1983, No. 83-29, § 2 (c).