Case Name: Adrian McDONALD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-04-24
Citations: 814 So. 2d 1212
Docket Number: No. 4D02-514
Parties: Adrian McDONALD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: KLEIN, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 814
Pages: 1212–1213

Head Matter:
Adrian McDONALD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D02-514.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
April 24, 2002.
Adrian McDonald, Arcadia, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Donna M. Hoffmann, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Adrian McDonald alleges that he did not have the predicate convictions to declare him a habitual offender. The trial court denied the motion as not cognizable under Rule 3.800(a). We reverse and remand for the trial court to consider whether it is apparent from the face of the record that McDonald did not have the requisite predicate felonies as a matter of law. Bover v. State, 797 So.2d 1246 (Fla.2001); Alloway v. State, 807 So.2d 187 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).
KLEIN, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.