Case Name: In re James C. PLATTS, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-04-01
Citations: 564 F. App'x 48
Docket Number: No. 14-1029
Parties: In re James C. PLATTS, Petitioner.
Judges: Before MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 564
Pages: 48–48

Head Matter:
In re James C. PLATTS, Petitioner.
No. 14-1029.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 27, 2014.
Decided: April 1, 2014.
James C. Platts, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James C. Platts filed a petition for a writ of mandamus and an amended petition for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pau-peris and deny the mandamus petitions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.
To the extent Platts requests that this court rule on his § 2241 petition in the first instance, we conclude that Platts is not entitled to such relief.