Case Name: Geo. M. McDonald et al., Appellants, v. Peter Van Houten et al., Respondents
Court: Washington Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Washington
Decision Date: 1910-08-12
Citations: 59 Wash. 593
Docket Number: No. 8678
Parties: Geo. M. McDonald et al., Appellants, v. Peter Van Houten et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Washington Reports
Volume: 59
Pages: 593–594

Head Matter:
[No. 8678.
Department One.
August 12, 1910.]
Geo. M. McDonald et al., Appellants, v. Peter Van Houten et al., Respondents.
Appeal — Record—Statement or Pacts — Necessity—-Time ror Piling. A statement of facts not filed within the time limited by-statute will be struck out on motion, and the judgment affirmed where the errors assigned cannot be reviewed without the aid of the statement.
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Douglas county, Steiner, J., entered November 15, 1909, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the defendants.
Appeal dismissed.
Walter & Bryant, for appellants.
Canton & Hensel, for respondents.
Reported in 110 Pac. 428.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Respondent moves to strike the statement of facts for the reason that it was not filed within the time-limited by the statute. Judgment was entered on November-15, 1909. A statement of facts was filed in the office of the clerk of the superior court February 2, 1910, and settled by the court March 15, 1910. No order or stipulation extending the time for filing appears in the record, and the-motion should be allowed. State v. Aschenbrenner, 45 Wash. 125, 87 Pac. 1118, and cases there cited. This conclusion-requires an affirmance of the judgment, as none of the errors, assigned can be reviewed without the aid of the evidence.
Judgment is affirmed.