Case Name: WILLIAMSPORT PLANING MILL CO., A CORPORATION IN LIQUIDATION, RELATOR-RESPONDENT, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF PATERSON, IN THE COUNTY OF PASSAIC AND STATE OF NEW JERSEY, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1944-04-20
Citations: 131 N.J.L. 486
Docket Number: 
Parties: WILLIAMSPORT PLANING MILL CO., A CORPORATION IN LIQUIDATION, RELATOR-RESPONDENT, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF PATERSON, IN THE COUNTY OF PASSAIC AND STATE OF NEW JERSEY, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 131
Pages: 486–487

Head Matter:
WILLIAMSPORT PLANING MILL CO., A CORPORATION IN LIQUIDATION, RELATOR-RESPONDENT, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF PATERSON, IN THE COUNTY OF PASSAIC AND STATE OF NEW JERSEY, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Argued February 2, 1944
Decided April 20, 1944.
For the relator-respondent. Kristeller & Zucker (Saul J. Zucker).
For the defendant-appellant, Joseph Coult and Harold J). Green.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The conclusions reached by the Supremo Court are sound and the judgment should be affirmed. We think that the Board of Education, which was not a party to Williamsport Planing Mill Co. v. Maryland Casuatty Co., 129 N. J. L. 333, was not estopped by the last mentioned decision in the Supreme Court from arguing for a final acceptance but that the issue was nevertheless meritoriously decided adversely to the contention.
The judgment appealed from is affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Case, Donges, Porter, Dear, Wells, Raeeertv, Hague, Thompson. Dill, JJ. 11.
For reversal — Hetlee, Pbrskie, J,T. 2.