Case Name: Clarence E. BATTLE, Petitioner, v. WARREN J. SCHAFER SUPPLY COMPANY, Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, and the Florida Industrial Commission, an administrative agency, Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1969-06-18
Citations: 223 So. 2d 725
Docket Number: No. 38335
Parties: Clarence E. BATTLE, Petitioner, v. WARREN J. SCHAFER SUPPLY COMPANY, Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, and the Florida Industrial Commission, an administrative agency, Respondents.
Judges: ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, CARLTON and BOYD, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 223
Pages: 725–725

Head Matter:
Clarence E. BATTLE, Petitioner, v. WARREN J. SCHAFER SUPPLY COMPANY, Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, and the Florida Industrial Commission, an administrative agency, Respondents.
No. 38335.
Supreme Court of Florida.
June 18, 1969.
John M. Abramson, of Feldman & Abramson, Miami, for petitioner.
R. E. Hodges, of Lally, Miller & Hodges, Miami, Patrick H. Mears ánd J. Franklin Garner, Tallahassee, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date January 24, 1969.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
The petition for allowance of an attorney's fee is also denied.
ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, CARLTON and BOYD, JJ., concur.