Case Name: Rito HERNANDEZ RUIZ, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-09-20
Citations: 109 F. App'x 867
Docket Number: No. 02-71297; Agency No. A75-524-466
Parties: Rito HERNANDEZ RUIZ, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before PREGERSON, T.G. NELSON, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 109
Pages: 867–868

Head Matter:
Rito HERNANDEZ RUIZ, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 02-71297.
Agency No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 13, 2004.
Decided Sept. 20, 2004.
Rito Hernandez Ruiz, Canoga Park, CA, pro se.
Regional Counsel, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Legal Officer, San Francisco, CA, Richard M. Evans, David Dauenheimer, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before PREGERSON, T.G. NELSON, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Rito Hernandez Ruiz, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of an April 18, 2002, order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 3.1(a)(7) without opinion an immigration judge's removal order and determination that Ruiz was ineligible for cancellation of removal or voluntary departure.
Because the immigration judge determined that Ruiz was removable for, inter alia, having been convicted of a crime relating to a controlled substance, a determination Ruiz does not contest in this petition for review, we lack jurisdiction to review the removal order. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C); Olivera-Garcia v. INS, 328 F.3d 1083, 1085 (9th Cir.2003).
PETITION DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.