Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ikechukwu OPARA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-06-11
Citations: 66 F. App'x 139
Docket Number: No. 98-10474; D.C. No. CR-97-40043-CW
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Ikechukwu OPARA, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before HILL, T.G. NELSON, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 66
Pages: 139–139

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Ikechukwu OPARA, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 98-10474. D.C. No. CR-97-40043-CW.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 9, 2003.
Decided June 11, 2003.
Before HILL, T.G. NELSON, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
The Honorable James C. Hill, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Eleventh Circuit, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
ORDER
Ikechukwu Opara's appeal is DISMISSED. He failed to raise the issues he now seeks to appeal before the district court and has therefore waived them.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
. See United States v. Beierle, 77 F.3d 1199, 1201 (9th Cir. 1996).