Case Name: PUGH v. STATE
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1923-03-12
Citations: 1 Ohio Law Abs. 282
Docket Number: No. 4634
Parties: PUGH v. STATE
Judges: 
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 1
Pages: 282–282

Head Matter:
No. 241
PUGH v. STATE
Ohio Court of Appeals, Cuyahoga County
No. 4634.
March 12, 1923
PRACTICE — Bill of exceptions deficient.
Error to Cleveland Municipal Court
Attorneys — V. J. Conrad, for Pugh; Lee E. Skeel, for State.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Epitomized Opinion
The record in this case is in such a condition that the Court of Appeals can do nothing but reverse the case because the bill of expections, as presented to us, approved and signed by the trial judge, purports to contain all the evidence introduced' in the court below, and the same contains no evidence upon which to base a'conviction. Judgment reversed and remanded to the Municipal Court.