Case Name: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Phillip DIMATTEO, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2017-02-15
Citations: 166 A.3d 1229
Docket Number: No. 693 MAL 2016
Parties: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Phillip DIMATTEO, Respondent
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 166
Pages: 1229–1230

Head Matter:
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Phillip DIMATTEO, Respondent
No. 693 MAL 2016
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
February 15, 2017

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 15th day of February, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, rephrased for clarity, are:
(1) Whether the Superior Court panel decision is in conflict with the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania's decision in Commonwealth v. Washington, — Pa. -, 142 A.3d 810 (2016), decided July 19, 2016?
(2) Whether the Superior Court panel decision ordered inappropriate relief, in that, the panel vacated that portion of the plea defendant challenged and remanded for resen-tencing; if defendant is entitled to relief, which he is not, the appropriate relief would be to vacate the entire plea and remand the case for trial on all the original charges?