Case Name: Daniel Bauza et al., Respondents, v. Curtis Stubbs et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2004-03-11
Citations: 5 A.D.3d 208
Docket Number: 
Parties: Daniel Bauza et al., Respondents, v Curtis Stubbs et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 5
Pages: 208–208

Head Matter:
Daniel Bauza et al., Respondents, v Curtis Stubbs et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.
[772 NYS2d 818]

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.), entered February 3, 2003, which granted plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability as against the Stubbs defendants, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Inasmuch as plaintiffs, in support of their motion, presented evidence showing that their vehicle, while stopped, was hit from behind by defendants' vehicle, and appellants, in responding to the motion, submitted only the affirmation of counsel, who had no first-hand knowledge of the facts, the motion was properly granted (see Mitchell v Gonzalez, 269 AD2d 250, 251 [2000]; and see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 563 [1980]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Ellerin and Friedman, JJ.