Case Name: Emmanuel Onuoha ACHONU, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-03-28
Citations: 11 F. App'x 767
Docket Number: No. 99-70997; INS No. A26-964-736
Parties: Emmanuel Onuoha ACHONU, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.
Judges: Before KOZINSKI and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges, and ZAPATA, District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 11
Pages: 767–768

Head Matter:
Emmanuel Onuoha ACHONU, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.
No. 99-70997.
INS No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 5, 2001.
Decided March 28, 2001.
Before KOZINSKI and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges, and ZAPATA, District Judge.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
The Honorable Frank R. Zapata, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Aehonu has presented no evidence that the deportation order entered against him in 1984 was defective, and we thus reject his contention that he was improperly placed in exclusion proceedings. Because Aehonu was properly placed in exclusion proceedings upon his attempted re-entry into the United States, the BIA lacked jurisdiction to entertain his motion to reopen the prior deportation proceedings. See 8 C.F.R. § 3.2(d).
DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.