Case Name: Danny Dale JUDD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-01-03
Citations: 666 So. 2d 237
Docket Number: No. 95-02145
Parties: Danny Dale JUDD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and BLUE and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 666
Pages: 237–237

Head Matter:
Danny Dale JUDD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 95-02145.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Jan. 3, 1996.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Danny Dale Judd appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. The only claim that merits discussion concerns Judd's allegation that he is entitled to credit pursuant to State v. Green, 547 So.2d 925 (Fla.1989). The trial court's order failed to address this issue. If this allegation is true, Judd may be entitled to relief.
Accordingly, we reverse. On remand, should the trial court again deny the motion, then it must attach portions of the record that refute Judd's claim. See Clingenpeel v. State, 610 So.2d 75 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).
Reversed and remanded.
SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and BLUE and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.