Case Name: PIERSMA v. SEITZ; BEALL v. DANIELS
Court: Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jurisdiction: Maryland
Decision Date: 1971-05-10
Citations: 262 Md. 61
Docket Number: No. 477
Parties: PIERSMA v. SEITZ BEALL v. DANIELS
Judges: 
Reporter: Maryland Reports
Volume: 262
Pages: 61–62

Head Matter:
PIERSMA v. SEITZ BEALL v. DANIELS
[No. 477,
September Term, 1970.]
Decided May 10, 1971.
(See opinion 10 Md. App. 439 (1970).)
The cause was argued before Hammond, C. J., and Barnes, McWilliams, Finan, Singley, Smith and Digges, JJ.
Martin H, Freeman, with whom were Sasscer, Clagett, Powers & Channing on the brief, for Priscilla R. Piersma, appellant. Frank B. Haskell, 111, with whom were Mitchell, Clagett & Haskell on the brief, for David R. Beall, other appellant.
Townes L. Dawson for William L. Seitz, appellee and submitted on brief by Russell W. Shipley and Kahler, Shipley & O’Malley for Judith G. Daniels, other appellee.

Opinion:
Pee Cueiam.
This Court adopts the opinion of Chief Judge Murphy in Piersma v. Seitz, 10 Md. App. 439, and therefore affirms the judgments appealed from.
Judgments affirmed with costs.