Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael L. MOORE, a/k/a Gadget, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-04-17
Citations: 322 F. App'x 348
Docket Number: No. 08-8383
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Michael L. MOORE, a/k/a Gadget, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 322
Pages: 348–348

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Michael L. MOORE, a/k/a Gadget, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 08-8383.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 8, 2009.
Decided: April 17, 2009.
Michael L. Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas More Hollenhorst, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael L. Moore appeals the district court's order denying Moore's motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Moore, No. 1:97-er00362-JCC-1 (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 3, 2008; entered Sept. 4, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.