Case Name: DRINK INC., LLC d/b/a Main Street Bistro, Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. CHARLES, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2009-09-15
Citations: 292 S.W.3d 589
Docket Number: No. ED 92343
Parties: DRINK INC., LLC d/b/a Main Street Bistro, Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. CHARLES, Respondent.
Judges: Before KURT S. ODENWALD, P.J., GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J., and ROY L. RICHTER, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 292
Pages: 589–590

Head Matter:
DRINK INC., LLC d/b/a Main Street Bistro, Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. CHARLES, Respondent.
No. ED 92343.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Sept. 15, 2009.
Larry A. Bagsby, St. Charles, MO, for Appellant.
Debbie S. Champion, Victor H. Essen II, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.
Before KURT S. ODENWALD, P.J., GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J., and ROY L. RICHTER, J.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Drink Ink, LLC d/b/a Main Street Bistro (hereinafter, "Appellant") appeals from the trial court's judgment dismissing its first amended petition against the City of St. Charles (hereinafter, "the City") for failing to state a claim for relief. Appellant raises one point on appeal, arguing the ordinance at issue was unconstitutional and invalid, causing Appellant to forfeit its commercial lease without just compensation.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule-84.16(b).