Case Name: Mark E. BROOM, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2008-06-24
Citations: 258 S.W.3d 73
Docket Number: No. WD 68194
Parties: Mark E. BROOM, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before PAUL M. SPINDEN, Presiding Judge, JAMES M. SMART, JR., Judge and JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 258
Pages: 73–73

Head Matter:
Mark E. BROOM, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 68194.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
June 24, 2008.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 29, 2008.
Ruth Sanders, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
Jamie P. Rasmussen, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before PAUL M. SPINDEN, Presiding Judge, JAMES M. SMART, JR., Judge and JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Mark E. Broom appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value, but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).