Case Name: Sultana ROMAN, Appellant, v. JACKSONVILLE COACH COMPANY, a corporation, Appellee
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1956-12-05
Citations: 90 So. 2d 913
Docket Number: 
Parties: Sultana ROMAN, Appellant, v. JACKSONVILLE COACH COMPANY, a corporation, Appellee.
Judges: TERRELL, Acting Chief Justice, O’CONNELL and BUFORD, JJ., and LOPEZ, Associate Justice, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 90
Pages: 913–914

Head Matter:
Sultana ROMAN, Appellant, v. JACKSONVILLE COACH COMPANY, a corporation, Appellee.
Supreme Court of Florida, Special Division A.
Dec. 5, 1956.
John M. Marees and Jack F. Wayman, Jacksonville, for appellant.
Rogers, Towers, Bailey. & Jones and Earle C. Moss, Jr., Jacksonville, for appel-lee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to Rule 38 of the rules of this court, 31 F.S.A., and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;
It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from- be, and the same -is hereby granted, and the judgment is
Affirmed.
TERRELL, Acting Chief Justice, O'CONNELL and BUFORD, JJ., and LOPEZ, Associate Justice, concur.