Case Name: JOHN ROBERTS, Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Respondent, v. SECURITY TRUST & SAVINGS BANK (a Corporation) et al., as Executors, etc., Defendants, Cross-complainants and Respondents; SECURITY TRUST & SAVINGS BANK (a Corporation) et al., Defendants, Cross-defendants and Respondents; UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY COMPANY (a Corporation), Cross-defendant and Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1925-07-31
Citations: 196 Cal. 575
Docket Number: L. A. No. 7909
Parties: JOHN ROBERTS, Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Respondent, v. SECURITY TRUST & SAVINGS BANK (a Corporation) et al., as Executors, etc., Defendants, Cross-complainants and Respondents; SECURITY TRUST & SAVINGS BANK (a Corporation) et al., Defendants, Cross-defendants and Respondents; UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY COMPANY (a Corporation), Cross-defendant and Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Reports
Volume: 196
Pages: 575–575

Head Matter:
[L. A. No. 7909.
In Bank.
July 31, 1925.]
JOHN ROBERTS, Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Respondent, v. SECURITY TRUST & SAVINGS BANK (a Corporation) et al., as Executors, etc., Defendants, Cross-complainants and Respondents; SECURITY TRUST & SAVINGS BANK (a Corporation) et al., Defendants, Cross-defendants and Respondents; UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY COMPANY (a Corporation), Cross-defendant and Appellant.
Lawler & Degnan for Appellant.
Newlin & Ashburn, G. C. De Garmo, H. B. Cornell, and Culver & Nourse, for Respondents.
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher and H. F. Prince, Amici Curiae.

Opinion:
THE COURT.
In its application for a writ of supersedeas pending the final determination of this action on appeal the petitioner admits that if the judgment as rendered by the trial court is affirmed in toto no prejudice will be suffered by it. The court has this day handed down its judgment affirming the judgment of the trial court as rendered.
For that reason the writ is denied.