Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darryl BOYNES, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-04-17
Citations: 523 F.3d 451
Docket Number: No. 06-4841
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darryl BOYNES, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 523
Pages: 451–453

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darryl BOYNES, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-4841.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
April 17, 2008.
Peter Sinclair Duffey, City of Richmond Commonwealth Attorney, Richmond, VA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Robert Edwin Walker, Jr., Robert Walker & Associates, PC, Richmond, VA, for DefendanWAppellant.

Opinion:
ORDER
A member of the Court requested a poll on whether to rehear the case en banc. Chief Judge Williams and Judges Wilkinson, Niemeyer, Traxler, King, Shedd and Duncan voted against rehearing en banc. Judges Michael, Motz and Gregory voted to grant rehearing en banc.
Because the poll on rehearing en banc failed to produce a majority of judges in active service in favor of rehearing en banc, rehearing en banc is denied. Judge Gregory wrote an opinion dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc.