Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jesus SOTELO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-10-03
Citations: 249 F. App'x 373
Docket Number: No. 07-40379
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jesus SOTELO, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 249
Pages: 373–374

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jesus SOTELO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-40379
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Oct. 3, 2007.
James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jesus Sotelo raises arguments challenging the constitutionality of 21 U.S.C. § 841 and 851 that he concedes are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 528 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). United States v. Mata, 491 F.3d 237, 245 (5th Cir.2007). The Government's motion for summary af-firmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.