Case Name: In the Matter of Robert Pondexter, Respondent, v. Harold J. Smith, as Superintendent of Attica Correctional Facility, et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1985-12-20
Citations: 115 A.D.2d 1014
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Robert Pondexter, Respondent, v Harold J. Smith, as Superintendent of Attica Correctional Facility, et al.,
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 115
Pages: 1014–1015

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Robert Pondexter, Respondent, v Harold J. Smith, as Superintendent of Attica Correctional Facility, et al.,

Opinion:
for reargument granted and, upon reargument, judgment unanimously reversed, on the law, and petition dismissed (see, Matter of Semper v Smith, 66 NY2d 130). Moreover, the hearing officer's designation was proper (Matter of Purnell v Kelly, 115 AD2d 1010), and a review of the record reflects the right of respondent to call witnesses was not denied. Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, O'Donnell, Pine and Schnepp, JJ.