Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raul VARGAS-ORTIZ, Also Known as Daniel Vargas, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-06-21
Citations: 691 F. App'x 185
Docket Number: No. 16-50516 Summary Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raul VARGAS-ORTIZ, Also Known as Daniel Vargas, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before JOLLY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 691
Pages: 185–186

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raul VARGAS-ORTIZ, Also Known as Daniel Vargas, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-50516 Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed June 21, 2017
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Raul Vargas-Ortiz, Pro Se
Before JOLLY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Raul Vargas-Ortiz has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Vargas-Ortiz has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cm, R. 47.5.4.