Case Name: Yogr Raj v. The State
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1927-03-23
Citations: 106 Tex. Crim. 375
Docket Number: No. 10787
Parties: Yogr Raj v. The State.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Criminal Reports
Volume: 106
Pages: 375–376

Head Matter:
Yogr Raj v. The State.
No. 10787.
Delivered March 23, 1927.
The opinion states the case.
No brief filed for appellant.
Sam D. Stinson, State’s Attorney, and Robert M. Lyles, Assistant State’s Attorney, for the State.

Opinion:
LATTIMORE, Judge.
Conviction for vagrancy; punishment fine of $200.
The State's Attorney calls our attention to the fact that the record in this case contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exception, nor judgment, and moves to dismiss the appeal. In addition to the matters just enumerated, we observe that the transcript contains no, proper caption. It refers to a term of the County Court of Bexar County for criminal cases, begun and holden in the County of Bexar on — day of July, 1923. When the term ended is not shown. The complaint appearing in the transcript was filed on the 7th of July, 1923, apparently in the court of Ben S. Fisk, Justice of the Peace. The judgment adjudging appellant guilty appears to have been rendered by the same official. If there was ever any proceedings had in this cause in the County Court of Bexar County for criminal cases, there is nothing in the transcript to indicate it. There seems to have been no papers filed in said county court, or any trial there, or any judgment rendered, nor anything else which would give this court any jurisdiction to hear this appeal.
This court appears to be without jurisdiction, and the appeal is dismissed.
Dismissed.