Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Anthony G. Hofmann, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2017-02-22
Citations: 147 A.D.3d 1083
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony G. Hofmann, Appellant.
Judges: Chambers, J.P., Hall, Maltese and Barros, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 147
Pages: 1083–1083

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony G. Hofmann, Appellant.
[46 NYS3d 899]

Opinion:
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Dutchess County (Forman, J.), imposed December 1, 2015, upon his conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground, inter alia, that the sentence is excessive.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the sentence he received pursuant to the plea agreement constituted cruel and unusual punishment is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gil, 109 AD3d 484, 485 [2013]) and, in any event, without merit (see People v Jones, 39 NY2d 694, 697 [1976]).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80, 85-86 [1982]).
Chambers, J.P., Hall, Maltese and Barros, JJ., concur.