Case Name: Quince vs. Callender and others
Court: Court of Chancery of South Carolina
Jurisdiction: South Carolina
Decision Date: 1789-03
Citations: 1 Des. Eq. 160
Docket Number: 
Parties: Quince vs. Callender and others.
Judges: Present — Chancellors Hutson and Mathews.
Reporter: South Carolina Equity Reports
Volume: 1
Pages: 160–160

Head Matter:
Present — Chancellors Hutson and Mathews.
Quince vs. Callender and others.
MARCH. 1789.
case Eli.
». b. p. 196.
Interest of lowed where the contract, in°Nortl™Ca-rolina, had reference to lands in this state.

Opinion:
The master having represented to the court that the defendants in this cause had objected to the allowance of seven Per centí as not being the legal interest of North Carolina, where the marriage bond, in bill mentioned, was dated, the court were of opinion, that as the lands on which the settlement was made, Ian in this state, the interest °f iAis state should he allowed: And therefore ordered, that interest of seven per cent, being the legal interest thereof, should be allowed.