Case Name: Samuel MINGLE and Harry VanHorne, Petitioners, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1983-04-20
Citations: 429 So. 2d 850
Docket Number: No. 82-1915
Parties: Samuel MINGLE and Harry VanHorne, Petitioners, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: HURLEY and DELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 429
Pages: 850–852

Head Matter:
Samuel MINGLE and Harry VanHorne, Petitioners, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 82-1915.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
April 20, 1983.
Jon H. Gutmacher, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner, Mingle.
Pamela M. Burdick, Asst. Public Defender, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner, Van-Horne.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Marlyn J. Altman, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent. .

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We deny the petition on the threshold finding that certiorari is inappropriate be cause the defendant has a full, adequate and complete remedy on plenary appeal. See Chalfonte Development Corp. v. Beaudoin, 370 So.2d 58 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); Lynch v. City of Deerfield Beach, 369 So.2d 1042 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); Santini Brothers, Inc. v. Grover, 338 So.2d 79 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976).
HURLEY and DELL, JJ., concur.
GLICKSTEIN, J., specially concurs with opinion.