Case Name: The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Clark, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1996-04-10
Citations: 75 Ohio St. 3d 412
Docket Number: No. 95-2332
Parties: The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Clark, Appellant.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 75
Pages: 412–413

Head Matter:
The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Clark, Appellant.
[Cite as State v. Clark (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 412.]
(No. 95-2332
Submitted February 20, 1996
Decided April 10, 1996.)
Stephanie Tubbs Jones, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Karen L. Johnson, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
Lamont Clark, pro se.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We affirm the decision of the court of appeals based upon appellant's failure to demonstrate a genuine issue as to whether his appellate counsel provided constitutionally adequate representation.
Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.
Wright, J., not participating.