Case Name: James W. SCHOTTEL, Jr., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Scott B. MEYER, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-12-17
Citations: 92 S.W.3d 313
Docket Number: No. ED 81383
Parties: James W. SCHOTTEL, Jr., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Scott B. MEYER, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before PAUL J. SIMON, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., J. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 92
Pages: 313–313

Head Matter:
James W. SCHOTTEL, Jr., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Scott B. MEYER, Defendant/Respondent.
No. ED 81383.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Dec. 17, 2002.
James W. Schottel, Jr., Schottel & Associates, P.C., St. Louis, MO, pro se.
Scott B. Meyer, Belleville, IL, pro se.
Before PAUL J. SIMON, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., J. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff, James W. Schottel, Jr., appeals from the trial court's judgment dismissing his tortious interference action for lack of personal jurisdiction. No error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).