Case Name: Aleida Martinez MOLINA, Appellant, v. Andrew S. YAGODA, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2014-04-23
Citations: 138 So. 3d 502
Docket Number: No. 3D13-1040
Parties: Aleida Martinez MOLINA, Appellant, v. Andrew S. YAGODA, Appellee.
Judges: Before ROTHENBERG, SALTER, and LOGUE, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 138
Pages: 502–503

Head Matter:
Aleida Martinez MOLINA, Appellant, v. Andrew S. YAGODA, Appellee.
No. 3D13-1040.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 23, 2014.
Maria L. McMillan, P.A.; Law Offices of Greene Smith & Associates, P.A., and Cynthia L. Greene, Sonja Jean, and Lissette Gonzalez, for appellant.
Lisa A. Baird, P.A., and Lisa A. Baird, for appellee.
Before ROTHENBERG, SALTER, and LOGUE, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm because competent, substantial evidence supported the general magistrate's findings. See Rodriguez v. Reyes, 112 So.3d 671, 674 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) ("Witness credibility, like all disputed issues of fact, is a determination left to the finder of fact.").