Case Name: J. H. WISHEK, Respondent, v. WILLIAM HILDENBRAND as Mayor, and Christ Spitzer, Christ Schock, C. J. Eisenbeisz, Reinhold Schaber, John Schmidt, L. Walker, as Members of the City Council of the City of Ashley, McIntosh County, North Dakota, and the City of Ashley, McIntosh County, North Dakota, a Municipal Corporation, Appellants
Court: North Dakota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: North Dakota
Decision Date: 1925-05-02
Citations: 52 N.D. 672
Docket Number: 
Parties: J. H. WISHEK, Respondent, v. WILLIAM HILDENBRAND as Mayor, and Christ Spitzer, Christ Schock, C. J. Eisenbeisz, Reinhold Schaber, John Schmidt, L. Walker, as Members of the City Council of the City of Ashley, McIntosh County, North Dakota, and the City of Ashley, McIntosh County, North Dakota, a Municipal Corporation, Appellants.
Judges: hbtstiaNsoN, Oh. J., and Birukeel, JoiiNsoN, and Nuessue, JL, concur.
Reporter: North Dakota Reports
Volume: 52
Pages: 672–673

Head Matter:
J. H. WISHEK, Respondent, v. WILLIAM HILDENBRAND as Mayor, and Christ Spitzer, Christ Schock, C. J. Eisenbeisz, Reinhold Schaber, John Schmidt, L. Walker, as Members of the City Council of the City of Ashley, McIntosh County, North Dakota, and the City of Ashley, McIntosh County, North Dakota, a Municipal Corporation, Appellants.
(204 N. W. 364.)
Opinion filed May 2, 1925.
Rehearing denied May 25, 1925.
Fronz Shubech, for appellants.
Sekneller, Heder, .& Schneller and Purcell & Slallery, amicus cruda?.
Wished- & 'Wishelc, A. A. Liulwigs, Lauder & Lauder, and II. P. Pe mhu¡Ion, for respondent.

Opinion:
Burke, J.
This is an action brought by the plaintiff, under chapter ll¿ of the Session Laws of 1923, to disconnect 160 acres of land belonging to the plaintiff from the city of Ashley in the county of McIntosh and State of North Dakota. The petition, proof of hearing of .petition before the city council, decision of tire city council, and the decision of the judge of the district court on certiorari, are in all things tic same as in the case of Enderson v. Hildebrand, ante, 533, decided at this term, and which decision governs and controls the decision in this case. The decision of the lower court on certiorari is in all things affirmed.
hbtstiaNsoN, Oh. J., and Birukeel, JoiiNsoN, and Nuessue, JL, concur.