Case Name: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. Bryce C. DAVIS and Phillip L. Davis, d/b/a Davis Lumber Company and Davis Lumber Company, Inc., Respondents
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1949-02-14
Citations: 172 F.2d 225
Docket Number: No. 12635
Parties: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. Bryce C. DAVIS and Phillip L. Davis, d/b/a Davis Lumber Company and Davis Lumber Company, Inc., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 172
Pages: 225–225

Head Matter:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. Bryce C. DAVIS and Phillip L. Davis, d/b/a Davis Lumber Company and Davis Lumber Company, Inc., Respondents.
No. 12635.
United Stales Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
Feb. 14, 1949.
A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, and David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, NLRB, both of Washington, D. C., 'for petitioner.
Mark L. Taliaferro, of Birmingham, Ala., for respondents.
Before HUTCHESON, HOLMES, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The motion is granted, with recognition of the fact that respondent does not resist, but claims to be in compliance with, the Board's order.. The decree to be entered here, therefore, will provide that whatever the respondent has already done toward compliance with the order of the Board prior to entry of this court's decree will not be required to be redone, and only such things, if any, as have been left undone will be required to be done.