Case Name: Perry H. KAY, Sr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-12-23
Citations: 85 F. App'x 362
Docket Number: No. m 03-60186
Parties: Perry H. KAY, Sr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 85
Pages: 362–362

Head Matter:
Perry H. KAY, Sr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.
No. m 03-60186
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 23, 2003.
Perry H. Kay, Sr., pro se, Houston, TX, Petitioner-Appellant.
Bruce Raleigh Ellisen, Bethany Buck Hauser, Eileen J. O’Connor, Assistant Attorney General, US Department of Justice, B. John Williams, Jr., Washington, DC, for Respondent-Appellee.
Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Perry Kay, Sr., appeals, pro se, a determination of the Tax Court that he has an income tax deficiency for 1998 of $1,174. In a comprehensive and persuasive opinion filed August 8, 2002, T.C. Memo 2002-197, 2002 WL 1821678, the Tax Court reduced the claimed deficiency from $4,181.50 to $1,174.
In its opinion, the Tax Court carefully explained that Kay had not met his burden of substantiating all the claimed deductions. The decision is AFFIRMED, essentially for the reasons set forth by the Tax Court.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.