Case Name: Shifra Mendelovitz, Appellant, v. Elyahu Cohen et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2008-03-11
Citations: 49 A.D.3d 612
Docket Number: 
Parties: Shifra Mendelovitz, Appellant, v Elyahu Cohen et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 49
Pages: 612–612

Head Matter:
Shifra Mendelovitz, Appellant, v Elyahu Cohen et al., Respondents.
[852 NYS2d 795]

Opinion:
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in, inter alia, quashing the subpoenas served upon the nonparties Regal Home Collections, Inc., Mayer Rispler, Nat Safern, and Harri Shan, as the discovery sought is not material and necessary to the prosecution of the action (see White Bay Enters, v Newsday, Inc., 288 AD2d 211 [2001]; see also Riverside Capital Advisors, Inc. v First Secured Capital Corp., 28 AD3d 457, 459-460 [2006]; Golden Mark Maintenance v Alarcon, 265 AD2d 377 [1999]). Mastro, J.P., Fisher, Florio, Angiolillo and Dickerson, JJ., concur.