Case Name: Vermont-People's National Bank v. Fred E. Robertson et al.
Court: Vermont Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Vermont
Decision Date: 1930-01-14
Citations: 102 Vt. 379
Docket Number: 
Parties: Vermont-People’s National Bank v. Fred E. Robertson et al.
Judges: Present: Watson, C. J., Powers, Slack, Moulton, and Willcox, JJ.
Reporter: Vermont Reports
Volume: 102
Pages: 379–380

Head Matter:
Vermont-People’s National Bank v. Fred E. Robertson et al.
November Term, 1929.
Present: Watson, C. J., Powers, Slack, Moulton, and Willcox, JJ.
Opinion filed January 14, 1930.
Carpenter & Clawson for the defendant.
Frank F. Barter for the plaintiff.

Opinion:
Per Curiam :
This is a proceeding to foreclose a mortgage upon real estate. The plaintiff had a decree and one of the defendants asked leave to appeal to this Court. Leave was granted by the chancellor upon condition that the appellant file, within a time fixed, a bond for $5,000, conditioned to indemnify and save harmless the plaintiff from all loss or damage that he may suffer by reason of said appeal. The appeal was filed without furnishing the required bond.
The defendant contends that the court was without authority in imposing such a condition. Motion to dismiss the appeal was not filed, but we treat the plaintiff's oral objection to the same as equivalent to such a motion.
By G. L. 1561, appeals in proceedings of this character can be taken only by permission of the chancellor and in his discretion. In the exercise of such discretion he has the authority to impose reasonable conditions.
We cannot say that the bond required in this case is an unreasonable condition, and whether or not it was an abuse of discretion to order it, we do not decide, that question not being before us. The bond not having been filed the appeal was not perfected. The appeal was, therefore, unauthorized and the case is not in this Court. Appeal dismissed.
Note. — Watson, C. J., sat in the hearing of this case, hut by reason of his death, did not take part in its decision.