Case Name: Robert A. ESPINOZA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-02-01
Citations: 710 F. App'x 267
Docket Number: No. 17-3279
Parties: Robert A. ESPINOZA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before William J. Bauer, Circuit Judge, Frank H. Easterbrook, Circuit Judge, Daniel A. Manion, Circuit Judge
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 710
Pages: 267–268

Head Matter:
Robert A. ESPINOZA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 17-3279
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Submitted January 31, 2018
Decided February 1, 2018
Thomas W. Patton, Attorney, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Peoria, IL, for Petitioner-Appellant
Jason M. Bohm, Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Urbana, IL, for Respondent-Appellee
Before William J. Bauer, Circuit Judge, Frank H. Easterbrook, Circuit Judge, Daniel A. Manion, Circuit Judge
We have agreed to decide the case without oral argument because the appeal is frivolous. FED. R. APP. P. 34(a)(2)(A).

Opinion:
Order
The judgment is affirmed on the authority of Hill v. United States, 877 F.3d 717 (7th Cir. 2017).
This successive appeal has been submitted to the original panel under Operating Procedure 6(b). We have unanimously agreed to decide the case without argument because the-briefs and record adequately present the facts and legal arguments, and argument would not significantly aid the court. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2)(C).