Case Name: Jerome SINGLETARY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-07-19
Citations: 761 So. 2d 496
Docket Number: No. 3D00-1183
Parties: Jerome SINGLETARY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before COPE, GODERICH and SORONDO, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 761
Pages: 496–497

Head Matter:
Jerome SINGLETARY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D00-1183.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 19, 2000.
Jerome Singletary, in proper person.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Darien M. Doe, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before COPE, GODERICH and SORONDO, JJ.

Opinion:
CONFESSION OF ERROR
PER CURIAM.
The defendant challenges his sentence pursuant to the 1995 sentencing guidelines, which were invalidated by Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla. 2000), on the ground that chapter 95-184 violated the single subject requirement of the Florida Consti tution. The state properly concedes that the underlying offense in this case occurred within the window period determined in Trapp v. State, 760 So.2d 924 (Fla.2000). Therefore, this cause is reversed and remanded for resentencing under the guidelines in effect prior to the enactment of Chapter 95-184.