Case Name: James GOODMAN, Appellant, v. Steven SHAPIRO, et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-03-17
Citations: 594 So. 2d 873
Docket Number: No. 91-2293
Parties: James GOODMAN, Appellant, v. Steven SHAPIRO, et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and JORGENSON and GODERICH, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 594
Pages: 873–873

Head Matter:
James GOODMAN, Appellant, v. Steven SHAPIRO, et al., Appellees.
No. 91-2293.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 17, 1992.
Cecil T. Farrington, Fort Lauderdale, Jeffrey L. Kossis, Pompano Beach, for appellant.
Murai Wald Biondo & Moreno and Marianne A. Vos, Miami, Daniel L. Ginsberg, North Miami Beach, for appellees.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and JORGENSON and GODERICH, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See In re Estate of Lane, 562 So.2d 352 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Cohen v. Schwartz, 538 So.2d 922, 923 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Tiedeman v. City of Miami, 529 So.2d 1266, 1267 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Dayton v. Conger, 448 So.2d 609 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).