Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kato HAINESWORTH, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-10-16
Citations: 20 F. App'x 239
Docket Number: No. 01-6881
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kato HAINESWORTH, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 20
Pages: 239–240

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kato HAINESWORTH, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 01-6881.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 18, 2001.
Decided Oct. 16, 2001.
Kato Hainesworth, pro se. S. David Schiller, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, VA, for appellee.
Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Kato Hainesworth seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Haines-worth, Nos. CR-98-30; CA-00-409-3 (E.D.Va. May 21, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.