Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Maurice HARDY, a/k/a Reece, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-05-25
Citations: 689 F. App'x 765
Docket Number: No. 16-7011
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Maurice HARDY, a/k/a Reece, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 689
Pages: 765–765

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Maurice HARDY, a/k/a Reece, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-7011
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 23, 2017
Decided: May 25, 2017
Maurice Hardy, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Marie Celeste, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Peter Jeffrey Martinez, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Maurice Hardy appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See United States v. May, 855 F.3d 271, 275-77 (4th Cir. 2017). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hardy, No. 1:11-cr-00358-ELH-2 (D. Md. July 12, 2016 & July 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED