Case Name: Frederick A. SPECKTOR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. CITIBANK [SOUTH DAKOTA], N.A., Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-02-16
Citations: 220 F. App'x 712
Docket Number: No. 05-55058
Parties: Frederick A. SPECKTOR, Petitioner—Appellant, v. CITIBANK [SOUTH DAKOTA], N.A., Respondent—Appellee.
Judges: Before: CANBY and THOMAS, Circuit Judges, and CONLON, District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 220
Pages: 712–712

Head Matter:
Frederick A. SPECKTOR, Petitioner—Appellant, v. CITIBANK [SOUTH DAKOTA], N.A., Respondent—Appellee.
No. 05-55058.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Feb. 14, 2007.
Filed Feb. 16, 2007.
Leonard Steiner, Esq., Steiner & Libo, Beverly Hills, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.
Julia B. Strickland, Esq., Stroock & Stroock & Lavan, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.
Before: CANBY and THOMAS, Circuit Judges, and CONLON, District Judge.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
The Honorable Suzanne B. Conlon, Senior United States District Judge for the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Frederick Specktor appeals the district court's denial of his motion to vacate a final and binding arbitration award. After a careful review of the record and the briefs, we affirm the judgment of the district court for the reasons stated in the well-reasoned district court opinion.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.