Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Sophia Gabrielle VIEIRA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-08-17
Citations: 472 F. App'x 280
Docket Number: No. 09-41056
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Sophia Gabrielle VIEIRA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 472
Pages: 280–280

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Sophia Gabrielle VIEIRA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-41056
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 17, 2010.
Amy Howell Alaniz, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, McAllen, TX, James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Sophia Gabrielle Vieira, San Antonio, TX, pro se.
Before DAVIS, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Sophia Gabrielle Vieira pleaded guilty to conspiring to possess with intent to distribute more than 500 grams of cocaine, possessing with intent to distribute more than 500 grams of cocaine, and importing more than 500 grams of cocaine. The district court sentenced her to concurrent 60-month terms of imprisonment and imposed concurrent five-year terms of supervised release.
For the first time on appeal, Vieira argues that the district court impermissibly delegated its judicial authority and plainly erred by requiring, as a condition of supervised release, that she participate in a mental health program "as deemed necessary and approved by the probation officer." In her reply brief, Vieira concedes that her arguments are foreclosed by United States v. Bishop, 603 F.3d 279 (5th Cir.2010), petition for cert. filed (July 6, 2010) (No. 10-52980), but she raises them to preserve them for further review.
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.