Case Name: Anthony MCNEISH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BIG SARGE BAIL BONDS ASSOCIATES INC.; Manley Yates; John Doe, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-08-10
Citations: 474 F. App'x 999
Docket Number: No. 12-6633
Parties: Anthony MCNEISH, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. BIG SARGE BAIL BONDS ASSOCIATES INC.; Manley Yates; John Doe, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 474
Pages: 999–999

Head Matter:
Anthony MCNEISH, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. BIG SARGE BAIL BONDS ASSOCIATES INC.; Manley Yates; John Doe, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 12-6633.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 1, 2012.
Decided: Aug. 10, 2012.
Anthony McNeish, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Anthony McNeish appeals the district court's order denying his motion for leave to amend his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint after it was dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See McNeish v. Big Sarge Bail Bonds Assocs., No. 5:1 1-cv-00739-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.