Case Name: Malcolm HOSWELL, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2005-02-16
Citations: 896 So. 2d 813
Docket Number: No. 4D04-4907
Parties: Malcolm HOSWELL, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: STONE, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 896
Pages: 813–813

Head Matter:
Malcolm HOSWELL, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 4D04-4907.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb. 16, 2005.
Rehearing Denied April 13, 2005.
Malcolm Hoswell, pro se.
No response required for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Malcolm Hoswell filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. This court denied the petition without citation and without indicating that denial was "with prejudice" or "on the merits." Hos-well then filed another habeas petition again raising a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. This court summarily denied the petition based on Card v. Dugger, 512 So.2d 829, 830 (Fla.1987).
In the instant petition for writ of certio-rari, Hoswell argues that the second petition could not be deemed successive because the first petition was not denied on the merits. See Topps v. State, 865 So.2d 1253 (Fla.2004). Hoswell's first petition was reviewed and denied on the merits. We deny relief in this proceeding because Topps does not apply to petitions alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c).
STONE, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.