Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. RYAN DALE MAGEE, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2006-09-06
Citations: 207 Or. App. 637
Docket Number: 03FE1129MA; A124799
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. RYAN DALE MAGEE, Appellant.
Judges: Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Linder and Wollheim, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 207
Pages: 637–638

Head Matter:
Submitted on record and briefs July 7,
reversed and remanded with instructions to merge convictions for attempted burglary and for resentencing; otherwise affirmed September 6, 2006
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. RYAN DALE MAGEE, Appellant.
03FE1129MA; A124799
142 P3d 123
Peter A. Ozanne, Executive Director, Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, Legal Services Division, and Joshua B. Crowther, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Douglas F. Zier, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Linder and Wollheim, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant was convicted of, among other offenses, one count of attempted burglary (with intent to commit harassment) and one count of attempted burglary (with intent to commit menacing). ORS 164.225; ORS 161.405. Defendant argues that the two attempted burglaries — both based on a single attempted entry — should have merged into a single conviction for attempted burglary. The state concedes that the trial court erred in failing to merge the convictions. State v. Barrett, 331 Or 27, 10 P3d 901 (2000). We agree and accept the concession.
Reversed and remanded with instructions to merge convictions for attempted burglary and for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.
Because we conclude that this error requires resentencing, we must remand the entire case for resentencing. ORS 138.222(5).