Case Name: Elease HILL; Carlton Newsome; Vada Smith Plaintiffs-Appellants v. CITY OF EL DORADO, an Incorporated Body through Mayor Frank Hass in his Official Capacity as Mayor and City Council in their Individual Official Capacity as the City Council of El Dorado Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-05-17
Citations: 686 F. App'x 381
Docket Number: No. 16-2854
Parties: Elease HILL; Carlton Newsome; Vada Smith Plaintiffs-Appellants v. CITY OF EL DORADO, an Incorporated Body through Mayor Frank Hass in his Official Capacity as Mayor and City Council in their Individual Official Capacity as the City Council of El Dorado Defendant-Appellee
Judges: Before GRUENDER, ARNOLD, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 686
Pages: 381–382

Head Matter:
Elease HILL; Carlton Newsome; Vada Smith Plaintiffs-Appellants v. CITY OF EL DORADO, an Incorporated Body through Mayor Frank Hass in his Official Capacity as Mayor and City Council in their Individual Official Capacity as the City Council of El Dorado Defendant-Appellee
No. 16-2854
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: May 10, 2017
Filed: May 17, 2017
Terrence Cain, Little Rock, AR, Brian G. Smith, Sr., Smith & Nworkorie, Farm-erville, LA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants
Henry C. Kinslow, El Dorado, AR, Michael Allen Mosley, Arkansas Municipal League, Legal, North Little Rock, AR, Matthew Keith Wren, Wren Law Firm, Little Rock, AR, for Defendant-Appellee
Before GRUENDER, ARNOLD, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Elease Hill, Carlton Newsome, and Vada Smith appeal the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment in their 42 U.S.C. § 1988 action. Appellants have identified no valid basis for reversal of the rulings they challenge, and we find none. See Malone v. Hinman, 847 F.3d 949, 952 (8th Cir. 2017) (de novo review). The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Susan 0. Hickey, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.
. We.have not considered arguments appellants raise for the first time on appeal. See Schaffer v. Beringer, 842 F.3d 585, 592 n.2 (8th Cir. 2016), petition for cert. filed, U.S. Feb. 17, 2017 (No. 16-1262).