Case Name: James Hedman CLARK, Appellant, v. Tom A. MICKES, former SSD attorney; The Law Firm, formerly known as Mickes, Tueth, Kenney, Cooper, Mohan & Jackstadt; Special School District; Francis Howell School District, Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-12-27
Citations: 258 F. App'x 916
Docket Number: No. 06-3135
Parties: James Hedman CLARK, Appellant, v. Tom A. MICKES, former SSD attorney; The Law Firm, formerly known as Mickes, Tueth, Kenney, Cooper, Mohan & Jackstadt; Special School District; Francis Howell School District, Appellees.
Judges: Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 258
Pages: 916–917

Head Matter:
James Hedman CLARK, Appellant, v. Tom A. MICKES, former SSD attorney; The Law Firm, formerly known as Mickes, Tueth, Kenney, Cooper, Mohan & Jackstadt; Special School District; Francis Howell School District, Appellees.
No. 06-3135.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 11, 2007.
Filed: Dec. 27, 2007.
James Hedman Clark, St. Louis, MO, pro se.
Jeffrey J. Kalinowski, R. Prescott Sifton, Jr., Jill A. Wieber, Blackwell & Sanders, Charles B. Jellinek, Heidi Kuns Durr Bryan & Cave St. Louis, MO, Cindy Reeds Ormsby, Crotzer & Ford, Clayton, MO, for Appellees.
Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
James Hedman Clark appeals the district court's dismissal of his civil rights complaint. Upon de novo review, see Reis v. Walker, 491 F.3d 868, 870 (8th Cir.2007), we agree with the district court that Clark failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also grant appellees' motions to strike, and we deny Clark's pending motions.
. The Honorable E. Richard Webber, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.