Case Name: Riva Bennett et al., Appellants, v. Rockrose Development Corp. et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1985-05-02
Citations: 64 N.Y.2d 1155
Docket Number: 
Parties: Riva Bennett et al., Appellants, v Rockrose Development Corp. et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 64
Pages: 1155–1156

Head Matter:
Riva Bennett et al., Appellants, v Rockrose Development Corp. et al., Respondents.
Decided May 2, 1985
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Jeff H. Galloway and George D. Sullivan for appellants.
Steven L. Schultz for respondents.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (106 AD2d 256). Plaintiffs' constitutional challenge to the retroactive application of revised Real Property Law § 226-b was considered and rejected in Vance v Century Apts. Assoc. (61 NY2d 716). (See also, Blum v West End Assoc., 64 NY2d 939.)
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons and Kaye. Taking no part: Judge Alexander.