Case Name: Carol SANDERS, Employee/Appellant, v. VI-JON LABORATORIES, INC. Employer/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-05-26
Citations: 967 S.W.2d 723
Docket Number: No. 73695
Parties: Carol SANDERS, Employee/Appellant, v. VI-JON LABORATORIES, INC. Employer/Respondent.
Judges: Before CRAHAN, C.J., and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, J. and CHARLES B. BLACKMAR, Senior Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 967
Pages: 723–723

Head Matter:
Carol SANDERS, Employee/Appellant, v. VI-JON LABORATORIES, INC. Employer/Respondent.
No. 73695.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
May 26, 1998.
Thomas P. Traube, Sorrell & Traube, St. Louis, for employee/appellant.
Patrick J. Horgan, Riethmann, Valentine and Rouse, St. Louis, for employer/respondent.
Before CRAHAN, C.J., and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, J. and CHARLES B. BLACKMAR, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Carol Sanders (Employee) appeals from the award by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission entered in favor of Vi-Jon Laboratories, Inc. (Employer), denying her claim for compensation. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the award is supported by substantial and competent evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence based on the record as a whole. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the award pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).