Case Name: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, Appellant, v. SHELL'S CITY, INC., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1963-11-12
Citations: 157 So. 2d 531
Docket Number: No. 63-594
Parties: CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, Appellant, v. SHELL’S CITY, INC., Appellee.
Judges: Before CARROLL, TILLMAN PEAR'SON and HENDRY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 157
Pages: 531–532

Head Matter:
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, Appellant, v. SHELL’S CITY, INC., Appellee.
No. 63-594.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
Nov. 12, 1963.
Rehearing Denied Dec. 3, 1963.
Joseph A. Wanick, City Atty., Rothstein: & Tumin, Miami, for appellant.
J. M. Flowers and Milton M. Ferrell, Miami, Sibley, Grusmark, Giblin, King & Lev--enson, Miami Beach, for appellee.
Before CARROLL, TILLMAN PEAR'SON and HENDRY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is an interlocutory appeal from an order denying defendant's motion for summary decree.
We have carefully considered the briefs .and record on appeal and concluded that appellant has failed to demonstrate that it is entitled to a summary decree at this point in the proceedings.
Accordingly we must affirm the order appealed.
Affirmed.