Case Name: Irving FLORES, DOC #C04283, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2018-03-02
Citations: 241 So. 3d 231
Docket Number: Case No. 2D16–1220
Parties: Irving FLORES, DOC #C04283, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 241
Pages: 231–232

Head Matter:
Irving FLORES, DOC #C04283, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Case No. 2D16-1220
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Opinion filed March 2, 2018
Rehearing Denied April 9, 2018
Irving Flores, pro se.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Dawn A. Tiffin, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Irving Flores appeals the denial of his motion for postconviction relief. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850. In the first ground of his motion, Mr. Flores sufficiently alleged that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to call a witness at trial. See Barthel v. State, 882 So.2d 1054, 1055 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). Because the record relied upon by the postconviction court did not conclusively refute Mr. Flores' claim, see Jones v. State, 71 So.3d 193, 195 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) ; Yarbrough v. State, 871 So.2d 1026, 1031 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004), we reverse the summary denial of the first ground and remand for an evidentiary hearing, see Nolan v. State, 794 So.2d 639, 641 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). We affirm the order in all other respects.
Affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded with instructions.
CASANUEVA, SLEET, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
Mr. Flores raised nine grounds in his motion for postconviction relief. The postconviction court denied the second and fourth grounds after an evidentiary hearing, and summarily denied the remaining grounds. On appeal, Mr. Flores only challenges the postconviction court's summary denial of the first and eighth grounds.