Case Name: Anthony CHRISANTHIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Brian CASON; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-06-07
Citations: 382 F. App'x 567
Docket Number: No. 09-15028
Parties: Anthony CHRISANTHIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Brian CASON; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 382
Pages: 567–568

Head Matter:
Anthony CHRISANTHIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Brian CASON; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 09-15028.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 25, 2010.
Filed June 7, 2010.
John Eric Stringer, Esquire, Law Office of John E. Stringer, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Abraham Aaron Simmons, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Anthony Chrisanthis appeals from the district court's judgment dismissing his action alleging that defendants retaliated against him for reporting unsafe workplace conditions in violation of the Federal Tort Claims Act ("FTCA") and other laws. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Mangano v. United States, 529 F.3d 1243, 1245 n. 2 (9th Cir.2008), and we affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Chrisanthis's FTCA claims because defendants' alleged retaliatory conduct fell within the scope of the Civil Service Reform Act's prohibited personnel practices, and thus his claims were preempted. See id. at 1246.
We do not consider issues that were not raised in Chrisanthis's opening brief. See Friends of Yosemite Valley v. Kempthorne, 520 F.3d 1024, 1033 (9th Cir.2008) (arguments not raised by a party in the opening brief are deemed abandoned).
Chrisanthis's contention regarding the U.S. Attorney's Office's representation of defendants Cason and Spivey is unpersuasive.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.