Case Name: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Antonio PIZANO-CORNEGO, also known as Javier Vega, also known as Diablo, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-08-16
Citations: 44 F. App'x 47
Docket Number: No. 01-3798
Parties: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Antonio PIZANO-CORNEGO, also known as Javier Vega, also known as Diablo, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 44
Pages: 47–48

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Antonio PIZANO-CORNEGO, also known as Javier Vega, also known as Diablo, Appellant.
No. 01-3798.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 7, 2002.
Decided Aug. 16, 2002.
Before HANSEN, Chief Judge, MCMILLIAN, and RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Antonio Pizano-Cornego appeals from the final judgment entered in the District Court for the Northern District of Iowa after he pleaded guilty to two counts of distributing methamphetamine within 1000 feet of a school, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B), (b)(1)(C) and 860(a), and one count of brandishing a firearm in relation to a drug-trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)(ii). The district court sentenced appellant to concurrent 108-month prison terms on the distribution counts and a consecutive 84-month term on the firearm count, followed by 8 years supervised release. Counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), arguing for reversal that the district court erred in sentencing appellant for brandishing — rather than merely possessing — the firearm.
We conclude that, based on the testimony of an undercover agent at sentencing, the district court correctly sentenced Piza-no-Cornego for brandishing a firearm. See United States v. Carlson, 217 F.3d 986, 987-89 (8th Cir.2000), cert, denied, 531 U.S. 1095, 121 S.Ct. 822, 148 L.Ed.2d 706 (2001). We have also reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), and have found no nonfrivolous issues.
Accordingly, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw, and we affirm the judgment of the district court.
A true copy.
. The Honorable Donald E. O'Brien, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa.