Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Julius WEBB, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2017-11-21
Citations: 533 S.W.3d 794
Docket Number: No. ED 104324
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Julius WEBB, Appellant.
Judges: Before Colleen Dolan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 533
Pages: 794–795

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Julius WEBB, Appellant.
No. ED 104324
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
Filed: November 21, 2017
Mary H. Moore, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Plaintiff/Respondent.
Jessica Hathaway, 120 S. Central Ave. Ste. 130,- St. Louis, MO 63105.
Douglas A. Forsyth, 906 Olive St. Ste. 525, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Defendant/Appellant.
Before Colleen Dolan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Julius Webb ("Appellant") appeals his conviction of robbery in the first degree (§ 569.020) and armed criminal action (§ 571.015) after a joint jury trial. The co-defendant in the case, Alphonse Williams ("Co-Defendant") was acquitted on both of his charges. Appellant now appeals the convictions alleging the trial court clearly erred in (1) submitting an erroneous jury instruction and (2) failing to declare a mistrial based on a-witness's improper testimony, although said testimony was ordered to be disregarded by the jury. We affirm.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).