Case Name: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v. BANCITALY CORPORATION, Respondent; BANCITALY CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1941-06-16
Citations: 121 F.2d 452
Docket Number: No. 9841
Parties: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v. BANCITALY CORPORATION, Respondent. BANCITALY CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
Judges: Before WILBUR, GARRECHT, and HANEY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 121
Pages: 452–452

Head Matter:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v. BANCITALY CORPORATION, Respondent. BANCITALY CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
No. 9841.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
June 16, 1941.
Samuel O. Clark, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., and J. P. Wenchel, Chief Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Washington, D. C. , for Commissioner.
George H. Koster, of San Francisco, Cal., Charles D. Hamel, of Washington, D. C., Monroe Goldwater, of New York City, and John Enrietto, of Washington, D. C., for Bancitaly Corporation.
Before WILBUR, GARRECHT, and HANEY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the joint motion of counsel for respective parties, and good cause therefor appearing, it is ordered that the petitions to review herein be dismissed, that a judgment be filed and entered accordingly, and mandate of this court issued forthwith.