Case Name: Demeatrius RUSH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2016-03-22
Citations: 489 S.W.3d 847
Docket Number: No. ED 102593
Parties: Demeatrius RUSH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J. and Mary K. Hoff and Roy L. Richter, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 489
Pages: 847–848

Head Matter:
Demeatrius RUSH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 102593
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Filed: March 22, 2016
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 26, 2016
Srikant Chigurupati, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, Attorney for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., Asst. Attorney Gener al, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899, Attorneys for Respondent.
Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J. and Mary K. Hoff and Roy L. Richter, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Demeatrius Rush appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without a hearing, claiming that his counsel was ineffective for misinforming him about the parole consequences of his plea.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).