Case Name: In re Objection to Order of Bd. of Commrs. on the Unauthorized Practice of Law
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1998-11-05
Citations: 83 Ohio St. 3d 1476
Docket Number: 98-2267
Parties: In re Objection to Order of Bd. of Commrs. on the Unauthorized Practice of Law.
Judges: 
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 83
Pages: 1476–1476

Head Matter:
Thursday, November 5, 1998
MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS
98-2267.
In re Objection to Order of Bd. of Commrs. on the Unauthorized Practice of Law.

Opinion:
This case was opened upon the filing of an objection to an order of the Board of Commissioners on the Unauthorized Practice of Law. Whereas movant Mark Szezepinski's objection does not contain proof of service as required by S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(2),
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that movant's objection be¡ and hereby is, stricken, and this case be, and hereby is, dismissed.