Case Name: Edwards, Respondent, vs. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Company, Appellant
Court: Wisconsin Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Wisconsin
Decision Date: 1926-11-09
Citations: 191 Wis. 328
Docket Number: 
Parties: Edwards, Respondent, vs. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Company, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Wisconsin Reports
Volume: 191
Pages: 328–330

Head Matter:
Edwards, Respondent, vs. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Company, Appellant.
October 14
November 9, 1926.
For the appellant there was a brief by Shaw, Muskat & Sullivan, and oral argument by John S. Barry', all of Milwaukee. ■.
For the respondent there was a brief by Carroll &'Thekan of Milwaukee, and oral ‘argument by George J. Carroll.

Opinion:
Vinje, C. J.
We perceive no abuse of discretion on the part of the circuit court in granting a new' trial. In such case the order must be affirmed. Raether v. Filer & Stowell Mfg. Co. 155 Wis. 130, 143 N. W. 1035.
As there must be a new trial, we purposely forbear to comment upon the testimony causing the setting aside of the verdict further than to state that it should not form the basis of a judgment.
By the Court. — Order affirmed.