Case Name: ALPHA DISTRIBUTING COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JACK DANIEL DISTILLERY et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1974-04-12
Citations: 493 F.2d 1355
Docket Number: No. 72-2776
Parties: ALPHA DISTRIBUTING COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JACK DANIEL DISTILLERY et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 493
Pages: 1355–1355

Head Matter:
ALPHA DISTRIBUTING COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JACK DANIEL DISTILLERY et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 72-2776.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
April 12, 1974.
Rehearing Denied May 31, 1974.
J. Albert Hutchison, San Francisco, Cal. (argued), for plaintiff-appellant.
Arthur B. Dunne, San Francisco, Cal. (argued), for defendants-appellees.
Before CHAMBERS, MOORE and ELY, Circuit Judges.
The Honorable Leonard P. Moore, United States Circuit Judge for the Second Circuit, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The court previously remanded the case to make findings on specific issues. See Alpha Distributing Company of California, Inc., v. Jack Daniel Distillery, Lem Motlow Prop., Inc., 9 Cir., 454 F.2d 442 (1972).
No further evidence was offered.
While it is a matter of opinion, it is our opinion that the district court did make the findings directed to be made.
Finding no error, we affirm.