Case Name: Saul & Company et al. v. Schlomerg et al.
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1914-08-18
Citations: 142 Ga. 245
Docket Number: 
Parties: Saul & Company et al. v. Schlomerg et al.
Judges: All the Justices concur.
Reporter: Georgia Reports
Volume: 142
Pages: 245–245

Head Matter:
Saul & Company et al. v. Schlomerg et al.
August 18, 1914.
Complaint. Before Judge Ellis. Fulton superior court. May 17, 1913.
Dorsey, Brewster, Howell & Heyman, for plaintiffs in error.
O. J. Coogler and Joseph W. & John D. Humphries, contra.

Opinion:
Fish, C. J.
1. The evidence authorized thé jury to find that a partnership existed.
2. In the brief of counsel for plaintiffs in error it is stated that, while they do not abandon-any of the grounds of the motion for a new trial, all of the alleged errors revolve about the question whether or not the evidence construed most favorably for the plaintiffs made a case of partnership. Having held that it did, none of the other grounds of the motion is such as to require a reversal.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.