Case Name: IN THE MATTER OF THE BORGATA WINTER POKER OPEN, A GAMING TOURNAMENT CONDUCTED BY MARINA DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC, D/B/A BORGATA CASINO HOTEL AND SPA BETWEEN JANUARY 14, 2014 AND JANUARY 18, 2014. JACOB MUSTEREL, FARID VAGHEFI AND STEVEN CELESTE, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS-PETITIONERS, v. MARINA DISTRICT FINANCE COMPANY, INC. AND MARINA DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC, D/B/A BORGATA HOTEL CASINO AND SPA, MARINA DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT HOLDING COMPANY, LLC, BOYD ATLANTIC CITY, INC. AND BOYD GAMING CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 2016-12-12
Citations: 228 N.J. 452
Docket Number: 
Parties: IN THE MATTER OF THE BORGATA WINTER POKER OPEN, A GAMING TOURNAMENT CONDUCTED BY MARINA DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC, D/B/A BORGATA CASINO HOTEL AND SPA BETWEEN JANUARY 14, 2014 AND JANUARY 18, 2014. JACOB MUSTEREL, FARID VAGHEFI AND STEVEN CELESTE, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS-PETITIONERS, v. MARINA DISTRICT FINANCE COMPANY, INC. AND MARINA DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC, D/B/A BORGATA HOTEL CASINO AND SPA, MARINA DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT HOLDING COMPANY, LLC, BOYD ATLANTIC CITY, INC. AND BOYD GAMING CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 228
Pages: 452–452

Head Matter:
157 A.3d 861
IN THE MATTER OF THE BORGATA WINTER POKER OPEN, A GAMING TOURNAMENT CONDUCTED BY MARINA DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC, D/B/A BORGATA CASINO HOTEL AND SPA BETWEEN JANUARY 14, 2014 AND JANUARY 18, 2014. JACOB MUSTEREL, FARID VAGHEFI AND STEVEN CELESTE, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS-PETITIONERS, v. MARINA DISTRICT FINANCE COMPANY, INC. AND MARINA DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC, D/B/A BORGATA HOTEL CASINO AND SPA, MARINA DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT HOLDING COMPANY, LLC, BOYD ATLANTIC CITY, INC. AND BOYD GAMING CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
December 12, 2016

Opinion:
ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION
To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:
A petition for certification of the judgment in A-4409-13 and A-231-14 having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;
It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied, with costs.