Case Name: Kenneth HOWARD, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-05-06
Citations: 105 S.W.3d 509
Docket Number: No. ED 81232
Parties: Kenneth HOWARD, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before PAUL J. SIMON, P.J. and GARY M. GAERTNER, SR. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 105
Pages: 509–509

Head Matter:
Kenneth HOWARD, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 81232.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
May 6, 2003.
Mary S. Choi, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Karen Kramer, Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before PAUL J. SIMON, P.J. and GARY M. GAERTNER, SR. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Kenneth Howard appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).