Case Name: John E. FLOOD, Jr., Susan L. Flood, Robert K. Burris, and Anne M. Burris, Individually and as Representatives of a Class of all Lot Owners of Wheeler Canyon Subdivision a/k/a Wheeler Canyon Estates and Wheeler Canyon Community Association, Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. CENTER GROUP INC., James Zavradinos, and Stanley Siegfried, Defendents/Appellants
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1997-10-28
Citations: 953 S.W.2d 953
Docket Number: No. 70809
Parties: John E. FLOOD, Jr., Susan L. Flood, Robert K. Burris, and Anne M. Burris, Individually and as Representatives of a Class of all Lot Owners of Wheeler Canyon Subdivision a/k/a Wheeler Canyon Estates and Wheeler Canyon Community Association, Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. CENTER GROUP INC., James Zavradinos, and Stanley Siegfried, Defendents/Appellants.
Judges: Before CRANE, P.J, and RHODES RUSSEL and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 953
Pages: 953–953

Head Matter:
John E. FLOOD, Jr., Susan L. Flood, Robert K. Burris, and Anne M. Burris, Individually and as Representatives of a Class of all Lot Owners of Wheeler Canyon Subdivision a/k/a Wheeler Canyon Estates and Wheeler Canyon Community Association, Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. CENTER GROUP INC., James Zavradinos, and Stanley Siegfried, Defendents/Appellants.
No. 70809.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Oct. 28, 1997.
Leslie Broome Yoffie, St. Charles, for appellant.
Charles W. Niedner, Niedner, Bodeux, Charmichael, Huff and Lenox, St. Charles, for respondent.
Before CRANE, P.J, and RHODES RUSSEL and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendants Center Group, Inc. and Deme-trious J. (Jim) Zavradinos appeal from the trial court's judgment against them on a claim of negligence per se. The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
. Zavradinos was named "James" in the petition.