Case Name: JUAN CARLOS LAGUNAS-GARCIA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jeri TAYLOR, Superintendent, Two Rivers Correctional Institution, Defendant-Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2016-03-16
Citations: 277 Or. App. 105
Docket Number: CV131038; A157019
Parties: JUAN CARLOS LAGUNAS-GARCIA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jeri TAYLOR, Superintendent, Two Rivers Correctional Institution, Defendant-Respondent.
Judges: Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Lagesen, Judge, and Garrett, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 277
Pages: 105–106

Head Matter:
Submitted January 8,
reversed and remanded for entry of judgment including the findings required by ORS 138.640(1) March 16, 2016
JUAN CARLOS LAGUNAS-GARCIA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jeri TAYLOR, Superintendent, Two Rivers Correctional Institution, Defendant-Respondent.
Umatilla County Circuit Court
CV131038; A157019
277 P3d 105
Jed Peterson and O’Connor Weber LLP filed the brief for appellant.
Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General, and Carolyn Alexander, Assistant Attorney General.
Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Lagesen, Judge, and Garrett, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Petitioner appeals a judgment denying post-conviction relief. His only assignment of error is an assertion that the post-conviction court failed to enter judgment in the form required by ORS 138.640(1), as construed in Datt v. Hill, 347 Or 672, 227 P3d 714 (2010). Defendant concedes that the form of judgment is not Datt compliant. However, defendant's concession assumes that the judgment implicitly incorporates the post-conviction court's oral findings. We reject that proposition, noting that the form of the judgment used in this case is virtually identical to the one we reversed today in Himebaugh v. Taylor, 277 Or App 18, 369 P3d 446 (2016). Because the post-conviction court's form of judgment as to all claims does not comply with ORS 138.640(1) as construed in Datt, the post-conviction court's judgment must be reversed and remanded for the court to enter a judgment that includes the required statements.
Reversed and remanded for entry of judgment including the findings required by ORS 138.640(1).