Case Name: US TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Stephen L. JOHNSON, In his official capacity as Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Chris Korleski, In his capacity as Director, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-01-08
Citations: 361 F. App'x 629
Docket Number: No. 09-3224
Parties: US TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Stephen L. JOHNSON, In his official capacity as Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Chris Korleski, In his capacity as Director, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: MARTIN, BOGGS, and WHITE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 361
Pages: 629–629

Head Matter:
US TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Stephen L. JOHNSON, In his official capacity as Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Chris Korleski, In his capacity as Director, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 09-3224.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Jan. 8, 2010.
Before: MARTIN, BOGGS, and WHITE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this appeal, United States Technology Corporation appeals the district court's dismissal of its request for injunctive and declaratory relief. Having reviewed the briefs and records in this case, we concur with the district court's well-reasoned opinion and AFFIRM its judgment. US Technology Corp. v. Stephen L. Johnson, et al., No. 2:08-CV-82, 2009 WL 86745 (S.D.Ohio Jan. 13, 2009).