Case Name: American Ferrofix Brazing Company, Respondent, v. Nathaniel R. Potter et al., Appellants
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1910-10-25
Citations: 199 N.Y. 574
Docket Number: 
Parties: American Ferrofix Brazing Company, Respondent, v. Nathaniel R. Potter et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 199
Pages: 574–575

Head Matter:
American Ferrofix Brazing Company, Respondent, v. Nathaniel R. Potter et al., Appellants.
American Ferrofix Brazing Co. v. Potter, 133 App. Div. 938, affirmed.
(Argued October 4, 1910;
decided October 25, 1910.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the. Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered June 7, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover upon a promissory note.
8. D. Bentley for appellants.
William W. Armstrong for respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Cli. J., Yann, Werner, Willabd Bartlett, Hiscook and Chase, JJ.