Case Name: Linda CHAGOLLA, Employee/Respondent, v. ST. ANDREWS CREDIT UNION, Employer/Appellant, and Cumis, Insurer/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-08-28
Citations: 53 S.W.3d 252
Docket Number: No. ED 78579
Parties: Linda CHAGOLLA, Employee/Respondent, v. ST. ANDREWS CREDIT UNION, Employer/Appellant, and Cumis, Insurer/Appellant.
Judges: Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., J. and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 53
Pages: 252–252

Head Matter:
Linda CHAGOLLA, Employee/Respondent, v. ST. ANDREWS CREDIT UNION, Employer/Appellant, and Cumis, Insurer/Appellant.
No. ED 78579.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Aug. 28, 2001.
Mark A. Anson, Rabbitt, Pitzer & Sond-grass, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for appellants.
Thomas P. O’Driscoll, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., J. and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
St. Andrews Credit Union and its insurer, CUMIS, (collectively referred to as Employer) appeal from a final award of workers' compensation benefits entered in favor of Linda Chagolla (Claimant) by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The Commission's award is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record, and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We affirm the award pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).