Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Emilio CHASE, a/k/a E, a/k/a Dominic Mario Chase, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-06-24
Citations: 327 F. App'x 400
Docket Number: No. 09-6377
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Emilio CHASE, a/k/a E, a/k/a Dominic Mario Chase, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 327
Pages: 400–401

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Emilio CHASE, a/k/a E, a/k/a Dominic Mario Chase, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-6377.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 18, 2009.
Decided: June 24, 2009.
Emilio Chase, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished by PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Emilio Chase appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Chase, No. 3:04-cr-00042-JPB-JES-1 (N.D.W.Va. Feb. 20, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.