Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Stanley Leon KEARNEY, Appellant; Stanley Leon KEARNEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-05-09
Citations: 897 S.W.2d 241
Docket Number: Nos. 64097, 67088
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Stanley Leon KEARNEY, Appellant. Stanley Leon KEARNEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 897
Pages: 241–241

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Stanley Leon KEARNEY, Appellant. Stanley Leon KEARNEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 64097, 67088.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
May 9, 1995.
Gary E. Brotherton, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Cheryl A. Caponegro, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant was convicted by a jury trial of first-degree robbery for which he was sentenced to ten years imprisonment. Defendant's Rule 29.15 motion was denied without an evidentiary hearing. Defendant appeals both the judgment entered upon his conviction and the denial of his 29.15 motion, which appeals have been consolidated. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that Defendant's claims of error are without merit. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).