Case Name: STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Darrin RIZZITELLO, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-10-11
Citations: 661 So. 2d 136
Docket Number: No. 94-2405
Parties: STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Darrin RIZZITELLO, Appellee.
Judges: DELL, KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 661
Pages: 136–136

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Darrin RIZZITELLO, Appellee.
No. 94-2405.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Oct. 11, 1995.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Don M. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Michael J. Heise of Law Offices of Michael J. Heise, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The state appeals from the trial court's dismissal of its information charging appellee with a violation of section 856.015, Florida Statutes (1993). The trial court based the dismissal upon its holding that the statute is unconstitutionally vague. The supreme court, however, has since declared section 856.015 constitutional. State v. Manfredonia, 649 So.2d 1388 (Fla.1995). In light of Manfredonia, appellee concedes error.
Accordingly, we reverse the order dismissing the information and remand to the trial court with instructions to reinstate the charge against appellee.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
DELL, KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.