Case Name: Manocraft Clothes, Inc., Respondent, v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1951-01-30
Citations: 278 A.D. 561
Docket Number: 
Parties: Manocraft Clothes, Inc., Respondent, v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 278
Pages: 561–561

Head Matter:
Manocraft Clothes, Inc., Respondent, v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Appellant.

Opinion:
Judgment unanimously reversed, with costs of this appeal to the appellant, and the complaint dismissed upon the ground that the failure to maintain a watchman as prescribed by the policy, while the premises were not open for business, was a bar to recovery, and judgment is directed to be entered dismissing the complaint herein, with costs. Present — Peek P. J., Glennon, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.