Case Name: CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. VIDEO MONITORING SERVICES OF AMERICA, INC., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1991-12-03
Citations: 949 F.2d 378
Docket Number: No. 90-8798
Parties: CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. VIDEO MONITORING SERVICES OF AMERICA, INC., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH and DUBINA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 949
Pages: 378–378

Head Matter:
CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. VIDEO MONITORING SERVICES OF AMERICA, INC., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 90-8798.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Dec. 3, 1991.
Christopher P. Bussert, Jerre B. Swann, Kilpatrick & Cody, Atlanta, Ga., Daniel J. Goldstein, Bruce P. Keller, Debevoise & Plimpton, New York City, for defendant-appellant.
David Nimmer, Kenneth A. Liebman, Robert Aldisert, Irell & Manella, Los Ange-les, Cal., June Ann Sanders, William N. Withrow, Jr., Troutmen, Sanders, Locker-man & Ashmore, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellee.
Francis D. Landrey, Charles S. Sims, Jon A. Baumgarten, Carole E. Handler, Pros-kauer, Rose, Goetz & Mendelsohn, New York City, Washington, D.C., Los Angeles, Cal., for amicus.
Peter C. Canfield, Dow, Lohnes & Albert-son, Atlanta, Ga., Sheila F. Anthony, Diane M. Morse, Arnold P. Lutzker, Dow, Lohnes & Albertson, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae A.H. Belo Corp.

Opinion:
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH and DUBINA, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.