Case Name: Olga M. FRAGA, Appellant, v. Antonio O. FRAGA, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-12-26
Citations: 555 So. 2d 427
Docket Number: Nos. 88-853, 88-2200 and 88-2292
Parties: Olga M. FRAGA, Appellant, v. Antonio O. FRAGA, Appellee.
Judges: Before HUBBART, FERGUSON and COPE, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 555
Pages: 427–427

Head Matter:
Olga M. FRAGA, Appellant, v. Antonio O. FRAGA, Appellee.
Nos. 88-853, 88-2200 and 88-2292.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 26, 1989.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 13, 1990.
Young, Stern & Tannenbaum and Glen Rafkin and Andrew S. Berman, North Miami Beach, for appellant.
Barranco, Kellough & Kircher, Podhurst, Orseck, Josefsberg, Eaton Meadow & Olin; Daniels & Hicks and Angela C. Flowers and Sam Daniels, Miami, for appellee.
Before HUBBART, FERGUSON and COPE, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We find no abuse of discretion in the overall equitable distribution, Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980). We note, however, that the amended final judgment, section V, contains the incorrect statement that the permanent alimony award is predicated upon appellant's receiving certain tax-free payments. Under the amended judgment there will be no tax-free payments. We therefore remand for correction of the amended final judgment and such further consideration of the terms of the award as may be equitable under the circumstances.
Affirmed and remanded for further consistent proceedings.