Case Name: Ramsey v. Randall et al.
Court: Supreme Court of Indiana
Jurisdiction: Indiana
Decision Date: 1873-11
Citations: 43 Ind. 549
Docket Number: 
Parties: Ramsey v. Randall et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Indiana Reports
Volume: 43
Pages: 549–549

Head Matter:
Ramsey v. Randall et al.
Supreme Court. — Assignment of Error. — Where the overruling of a motion for a new trial is not assigned as error, the Supreme Court will not consider any error properly constituting a cause for a new trial.
From the Marion Circuit Court.
W. Morrow and N. Trusler, for appellant.
E. T. Johnson, for appellee.

Opinion:
Downey, C. J.
There are no questions presented by the assignment of errors in this case, except such as should have been stated as reasons for a new trial. The overruling of the motion for a new trial is not assigned as error. The case is like the case of Cole v. Burris, 38 Ind. 168; and for the reasons there stated the judgment must be affirmed. See Tyner v. Adams, 34 Ind. 401.
Judgment affirmed, with five' per cent, damages and costs.