Case Name: Chukwuma E. AZUBUKO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA; Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-08-17
Citations: 475 F. App'x 914
Docket Number: No. 12-1511
Parties: Chukwuma E. AZUBUKO, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA; Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 475
Pages: 914–914

Head Matter:
Chukwuma E. AZUBUKO, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA; Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 12-1511.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 14, 2012.
Decided: Aug. 17, 2012.
Chukwuma E. Azubuko, Appellant Pro Se. Joshua Bryan Royster, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Chukwuma E. Azubuko appeals the district court's order denying his motion seeking consideration of his case by a three-judge court, 28 U.S.C. § 2284 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Azubuko leave to proceed in forma pauper-is and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Azubuko v. U.S. Dist. Court, No. 5:04-cv-00735-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 16, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.