Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ryan Mitchell WOOD, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-03-10
Citations: 269 F. App'x 648
Docket Number: No. 07-10269
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ryan Mitchell WOOD, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 269
Pages: 648–648

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ryan Mitchell WOOD, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-10269.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 26, 2008.
Filed March 10, 2008.
Elizabeth A. Olson, Esq., U.S. Attorney, Reno, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
David R. Houston, Esq., Reno, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: BEEZER, FERNANDEZ, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Ryan Mitchell Wood appeals from the 30-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for possession of an unregistered firearm in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5861(d). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Wood contends that the district court abused its discretion by applying an upward adjustment based on uncharged conduct. This contention fails because the district court was permitted to consider uncharged conduct for sentencing purposes. See United States v. Williamson, 439 F.3d 1125, 1140 (9th Cir.2006).
We decline to address Wood's remaining contention, which we conclude falls within the scope of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182-83 (9th Cir.2000).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.