Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Lucio Oscar Chavez HERNANDEZ, also known as Lucio Oscar Chavez, also known as Lucio O. Chavez, also known as Lucio Oscar Chavez-Hernandez, also known as Lucio Chavez Hernandez, also known as Salvador Peres, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-02-21
Citations: 555 F. App'x 467
Docket Number: No. 13-20048
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Lucio Oscar Chavez HERNANDEZ, also known as Lucio Oscar Chavez, also known as Lucio O. Chavez, also known as Lucio Oscar Chavez-Hernandez, also known as Lucio Chavez Hernandez, also known as Salvador Peres, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 555
Pages: 467–468

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Lucio Oscar Chavez HERNANDEZ, also known as Lucio Oscar Chavez, also known as Lucio O. Chavez, also known as Lucio Oscar Chavez-Hernandez, also known as Lucio Chavez Hernandez, also known as Salvador Peres, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-20048
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Feb. 21, 2014.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Molly Estelle Odom, Esq., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Lucio Oscar Chavez Hernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Chavez Hernandez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th CiR. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.