Case Name: CLOUD v. INDUSTRIAL LBR. CO.
Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1931-05-05
Citations: 17 La. App. 592
Docket Number: No. 804
Parties: CLOUD v. INDUSTRIAL LBR. CO.
Judges: 
Reporter: Louisiana Court of Appeals Reports
Volume: 17
Pages: 592–595

Head Matter:
No. 804
First Circuit
CLOUD v. INDUSTRIAL LBR. CO.
(May 5, 1931. Opinion and Decree.)
(June 16, 1931. Rehearing Refused.) (Reasons Attached.)
(October 6, 1931. Writ of Certiorari and Review- Refused by Supreme Court.)
Julius T. Long, of Shreveport, attorney for plaintiff, appellant.
Thornton, Gist & Richey, of Alexandria, attorneys for defendant, appellee.

Opinion:
MOUTON, J.
In this case counsel for appellant has made no appearance by brief or oral argument to point out any grounds of complaint. In such cases the judgment of the district court will be affirmed on the presumption of its correctness where it is apparently sustained by the record. Traders Securities Co. v. Heartfield Allen Drug Co., 8 La. App. 518; Succession of Suner, 5 La. App. 121; Schwan v. Peterman, 123 La. 726, 49 So. 486; Saenger-Ehrlich Enterprise, Inc., v. Stephens, 10 La. App. 188, 120 So. 778.
In this case, which presents questions of fact, we have, however, gone carefully over the evidence and find that the written opinion of the district judge is fully supported by the record, and have discovered no error to warrant a reversal.