Case Name: Lourdes IGLESIAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-04-26
Citations: 375 F. App'x 364
Docket Number: No. 09-2336
Parties: Lourdes IGLESIAS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P., Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 375
Pages: 364–364

Head Matter:
Lourdes IGLESIAS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P., Defendant—Appellee.
No. 09-2336.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 22, 2010.
Decided: April 26, 2010.
Lourdes Iglesias, Appellant Pro Se. Lindsey Hager McGinnis, Littler Mendel-son, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Lourdes Iglesias appeals the district court's order granting Defendant's motion to dismiss her claims against it. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. See Iglesias v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., No. 2:09-cv-00008-MSD-FBS (E.D.Va. Oct. 26, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.