Case Name: Cristobal HERNANDEZ-GONZALEZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-07-27
Citations: 475 F. App'x 196
Docket Number: No. 10-70035
Parties: Cristobal HERNANDEZ-GONZALEZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 475
Pages: 196–197

Head Matter:
Cristobal HERNANDEZ-GONZALEZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 10-70035.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 17, 2012.
Filed July 27, 2012.
Hector Ricardo Ortega, Ortega, Canossa & Associates, PLC, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.
Oil, Channah Farber, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Cristobal Hernandez-Gonzalez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order denying his motion to reopen. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the BIA's denial of a motion to reopen. Guzman v. INS, 318 F.3d 911, 912 n. 1 (9th Cir.2003) (per curiam). We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review Gonzalez-Hernandez's challenge to the BIA's underlying order dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge's denial of his asylum, withholding of removal, and Convention Against Torture claims because this petition is not timely as to that decision. See Singh v. INS, 315 F.3d 1186, 1188 (9th Cir.2003).
We reject Gonzalez-Hernandez's contention that he qualifies as an unaccompanied alien child under the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008. See 6 U.S.C. § 279(g)(2)(C). Accordingly, his challenge to the BIA's denial of his motion to reopen fails.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.