Case Name: Derrick GRANT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN, of Broad River CI, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-10-04
Citations: 669 F. App'x 140
Docket Number: No. 16-6631
Parties: Derrick GRANT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN, of Broad River CI, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 669
Pages: 140–141

Head Matter:
Derrick GRANT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN, of Broad River CI, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 16-6631
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: September 15, 2016
Decided: October 4, 2016
Derrick Grant, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Melody Jane Brown, Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Derrick Grant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2012). The magistrate judge recommended that the petition be dismissed, and advised Grant that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation.
The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge's recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 106 S.Ct. 466, 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985). Grant has waived appellate review by failing to file specific objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We also deny his pending motions for an extension of time to file a motion for a certificate of appealability and to withdraw his informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED