Case Name: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. CORDELE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1949-02-14
Citations: 172 F.2d 225
Docket Number: No. 12634
Parties: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. CORDELE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 172
Pages: 225–226

Head Matter:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. CORDELE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Respondent.
No. 12634.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
Feb. 14, 1949.
A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, and David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, NLRB, both of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
Benjamin Zeesman, of Cordele, Ga., for respondent.
Before HUTCHESON, HOLMES, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The court has considered the petitioner's motion for judgment and respondent's motion to dismiss. It is the opinion of the court that respondent's motion to dismiss presents matters not properly cognizable at this time, but, if at all, only upon subsequent proceedings in connection with the enforcement of the decree.
Respondent's motion to dismiss is therefore denied, and petitioner's motion for judgment is granted.