Case Name: David Joseph MERCADO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2001-04-18
Citations: 782 So. 2d 546
Docket Number: No. 3D00-1093
Parties: David Joseph MERCADO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before JORGENSON, LEVY, and GERSTEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 782
Pages: 546–546

Head Matter:
David Joseph MERCADO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D00-1093.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 18, 2001.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Manuel Alvarez, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Michael Neimand, Assistant Attorney General, and Ana Cristina Lloyd, Certified Legal Intern, for appellee.
Before JORGENSON, LEVY, and GERSTEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Collier v. State, 701 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (contents of BOLO report were admissible where report contained no accusatory information and was not offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted, but to establish sequence of events); Williams v. State, 714 So.2d 462 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)(tape recorded 911 calls made by victim and her son were admissible as excited utterances).