Case Name: In Interest of A.W. and A.H
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-06-15
Citations: 992 S.W.2d 938
Docket Number: No. 73818
Parties: In Interest of A.W. and A.H.
Judges: Before: RHODES RUSSELL, P.J., JAMES R. DOWD, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 992
Pages: 938–938

Head Matter:
In Interest of A.W. and A.H.
No. 73818.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Warrenton Division.
June 15, 1999.
Daniel J. Briegel, Union, for appellant.
Prudence Fink Johnson, Robert F. Garza, Guardian Ad Litem, Union, for respondent.
Before: RHODES RUSSELL, P.J., JAMES R. DOWD, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Mother appeals from the trial court's judgments terminating her parental rights to her children. We find the judgments are supported by substantial evidence, are not against the weight of the evidence, and do not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).