Case Name: Leotis POWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-08-07
Citations: 602 So. 2d 695
Docket Number: No. 91-03103
Parties: Leotis POWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: BOOTH, SMITH and ALLEN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 602
Pages: 695–696

Head Matter:
Leotis POWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 91-03103.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Aug. 7, 1992.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and James W. Rogers, Sr. Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This cause is before us on appeal from judgments and sentences for violation of probation, possession of cocaine with intent to sell, and resisting arrest without violence. Appellant's counsel has filed an An- ders brief in which he correctly points out that the sentencing order for resisting arrest without violence, a misdemeanor, reflects habitual offender status. We must, therefore, remand this case to the trial court with instructions to delete the habitual offender provision from appellant's sentence for this offense. DuBose v. State, 585 So.2d 1198 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Peterson v. State, 576 So.2d 1385 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). The judgments and sentences are otherwise affirmed.
BOOTH, SMITH and ALLEN, JJ., concur.
. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).