Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Antonio TORAN, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2007-06-12
Citations: 231 S.W.3d 236
Docket Number: No. ED 87926
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Antonio TORAN, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., and MARY K. HOFF, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 231
Pages: 236–236

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Antonio TORAN, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 87926.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
June 12, 2007.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 31, 2007.
Application for Transfer Denied Sept. 25, 2007.
Scott Thompson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jamie Wilson Corman, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., and MARY K. HOFF, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Antonio Toran (Defendant) appeals from the trial court's judgment and sentence imposed after a jury found him guilty of one count of possession of a controlled substance, more than 35 grams of marijuana, in violation of Section 195.202, RSMo 2000. The trial court sentenced Defendant to a term of five years' imprisonment but suspended execution of the sentence and placed Defendant on two years' probation.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).