Case Name: GREENLICH against ROSE
Court: New York City Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1885-07
Citations: 2 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 174
Docket Number: 
Parties: GREENLICH against ROSE.
Judges: 
Reporter: City Court Reports
Volume: 2
Pages: 174–175

Head Matter:
City Court.
Special Term
July, 1885.
GREENLICH against ROSE.
The validity of an execution cannot be inquired into on the return' of' an order in supplementary proceedings. The remedy is by special notion.

Opinion:
McAdam, Ch. J.
The judgment was recovered June 22,. 1818, and the execution was. issued June 8, 1885, about seven years afterwards. It has been returned wholly unsatisfied. The validity of the execution cannot be inquired into on the return of an order in supplementary proceedings (Sanford v. Sinclair, 8 Paige, 3/3; Union Bank v. Sargeant, 53 Barb. 422; 35 How. Pr. 87). It can be attacked only on a special motion to set the execution aside. The motion to vacate the suplemental order will therefore be denied. Unless the defendant submits to an examination thereunder on the 20th inst., at 10 A.51, an attachment will be issued.