Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Thomas B. WOLFIN Jr., Appellant; Thomas B. WOLFIN Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1997-08-26
Citations: 950 S.W.2d 313
Docket Number: Nos. 68534, 70940
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Thomas B. WOLFIN Jr., Appellant. Thomas B. WOLFIN Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before AHRENS, P.J., and CRANDALL and KAROHL, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 950
Pages: 313–313

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Thomas B. WOLFIN Jr., Appellant. Thomas B. WOLFIN Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 68534, 70940.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Aug. 26, 1997.
Kent Denzel, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Fernando Bermudez, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before AHRENS, P.J., and CRANDALL and KAROHL, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Thomas G. Wolfin, Jr., appeals from a judgment of the circuit court finding him guilty of concealing a prohibited article in a county jail, Sec. 221.111, RSMo 1994. He also appeals from a judgment denying him postconviction relief under Rule 29.15 following an evidentiary hearing. Wolfin argues that the court erred by (1) admitting certain evidence, (2) denying him effective assistance of counsel, (3) not granting a requested continuance, (4) improperly striking a venireper-son for cause, (5) sentencing him to cruel and unusual punishment, and (6) assessing costs against him in his 29.15 action.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgments of the trial court are affirmed in accordance with Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b).