Case Name: HOEY, Respondent, v. CLOUD, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1900-12-26
Citations: 67 N.Y.S. 1135
Docket Number: 
Parties: HOEY, Respondent, v. CLOUD, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 67
Pages: 1135–1135

Head Matter:
HOEY, Respondent, v. CLOUD, Appellant.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
December 26, 1900.)
Summary proceedings by Sarah Hoey against Frederick E. Cloud. From a final order in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals.
Reversed.
Guggenheimer, Untermeyer & Marshall (Moses Weinmann, of counsel), for appellant.
Albert I. Sire, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
There is not sufficient evidence in this case to support a finding, either that the petitioner had obtained a renewal of the lease of the premises in question from her lessor, or that a renewal agreement was •executed between the petitioner and her subtenant. While there is slight evidence relating to negotiations between the petitioner and a representative of her lessor, yet it does not appear that the agreement was consummated, and the verdict of the jury is without evidence tc support it. Final order reversed, and new tria ordered, with costs to the appellant to abidr the event.