Case Name: Joey Chester FULMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRANTECH RADIATOR PRODUCTS INC.; Paul Cooper, CEO; Deirdre E. Hicks, Human Resources Manager; Bobby Easler, Plant Manager; Raymond Griffin, Supervisor; Carl Houston, Supervisor, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-06-25
Citations: 474 F. App'x 259
Docket Number: No. 12-1281
Parties: Joey Chester FULMER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. TRANTECH RADIATOR PRODUCTS INC.; Paul Cooper, CEO; Deirdre E. Hicks, Human Resources Manager; Bobby Easler, Plant Manager; Raymond Griffin, Supervisor; Carl Houston, Supervisor, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 474
Pages: 259–260

Head Matter:
Joey Chester FULMER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. TRANTECH RADIATOR PRODUCTS INC.; Paul Cooper, CEO; Deirdre E. Hicks, Human Resources Manager; Bobby Easler, Plant Manager; Raymond Griffin, Supervisor; Carl Houston, Supervisor, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 12-1281.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 21, 2012.
Decided: June 25, 2012.
Joey Chester Fulmer, Appellant Pro Se. Lovic Alton Brooks, III, Brooks Law Firm, Columbia, South Carolina, for Ap-pellees.
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Joey Chester Fulmer appeals the district court's order accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation to grant Defendant's summary judgment motion on his employment discrimination claim, brought pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C.A. § 12101-12213 (West 2005 & Supp.2011). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. Fulmer v. TranTech Radiator Prods. Inc., No. 8:10-cv-01854-JMC, 2012 WL 589209 (D.S.C. Feb. 22, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.