Case Name: Leo Y. Chertok, Respondent, v. Sinclair Oil Corporation et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1950-10-17
Citations: 277 A.D.2d 974
Docket Number: 
Parties: Leo Y. Chertok, Respondent, v. Sinclair Oil Corporation et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 277
Pages: 974–974

Head Matter:
Leo Y. Chertok, Respondent, v. Sinclair Oil Corporation et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Opinion:
We find that this record sufficiently establishes that, insofar as plaintiff has any claim for unlawful interference with contract rights, such claim accrued prior to November 3, 1946, and, accordingly, the motion to dismiss the complaint under subdivision 6 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice should have been granted. Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellants, and the motion to dismiss the complaint under subdivision 6 of rule 107 granted. Settle order on notice. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Callahan, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.