Case Name: Arturo Cota RAMIREZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Tony SANTOS, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-09-17
Citations: 110 F. App'x 40
Docket Number: No. 03-35585
Parties: Arturo Cota RAMIREZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Tony SANTOS, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 110
Pages: 40–41

Head Matter:
Arturo Cota RAMIREZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Tony SANTOS, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 03-35585.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 15, 2004.
Decided Sept. 17, 2004.
Christine Stebbins Dahl, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Portland, OR, for Petitioner-Appellant.
Timothy A. Sylwester, Esq., Office of the Attorney General, Salem, OR, for Respondent-Appellee.
Before: WALLACE, GOULD, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Oregon state prisoner Arturo Ramirez appeals the district court's order denying his application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Ramirez argues that he was deprived of the constitutionally-required effective assistance of counsel during his sentencing after his conviction of murder because his counsel failed adequately to investigate and to marshal evidence that Ramirez was a juvenile at the time of the crime. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm for the reasons stated by United States Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin in his Findings and Recommendation of May 5, 2003, which were adopted by the district court in its Order of June 18, 2003.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.