Case Name: Tracy WOODY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MBNA AMERICA BANK, NA; Air Courier Association/cheaptricks.com, Defendants-Appellees; Tracy Woody, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Discover Financial Services, Incorporated, Defendant-Appellee, and Providian Financial Corporation, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-07-16
Citations: 69 F. App'x 196
Docket Number: Nos. 02-2326, 02-2327
Parties: Tracy WOODY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MBNA AMERICA BANK, NA; Air Courier Association/cheaptricks.com, Defendants-Appellees. Tracy Woody, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Discover Financial Services, Incorporated, Defendant-Appellee, and Providian Financial Corporation, Defendant.
Judges: Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 69
Pages: 196–196

Head Matter:
Tracy WOODY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MBNA AMERICA BANK, NA; Air Courier Association/cheaptricks.com, Defendants-Appellees. Tracy Woody, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Discover Financial Services, Incorporated, Defendant-Appellee, and Providian Financial Corporation, Defendant.
Nos. 02-2326, 02-2327.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 29, 2003.
Decided July 16, 2003.
Tracy Woody, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Edmond Weddington, Jackson Wyatt Moore, Smith, Anderson, Blount, Dorsett, Mitchell & Jernigan, Raleigh, North Carolina; James Dickson Phillips, III, Daniels & Daniels, P.A., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina; David Dreifus, Poyner & Spruill, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Tracy Woody seeks to appeal the district court's orders dismissing two civil actions wherein she raised claims under the Fair Credit Billing Act (FCBA) and the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) (see 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq.), in addition to state claims for slander, fraud, and negligence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Woody v. MBNA America Bank, No. CA-02-170-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 11, 2002); Woody v. Discover Fin., No. CA-02-171-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 16, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.