Case Name: Raymond Jerome FRANCIS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Joseph BROOKS, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-02-26
Citations: 88 F. App'x 638
Docket Number: No. 04-6120
Parties: Raymond Jerome FRANCIS, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Joseph BROOKS, Respondent—Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 88
Pages: 638–639

Head Matter:
Raymond Jerome FRANCIS, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Joseph BROOKS, Respondent—Appellee.
No. 04-6120.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 19, 2004.
Decided Feb. 26, 2004.
Raymond Jerome Francis, Appellant pro se.
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Raymond Jerome Francis, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Francis v. Brooks, No. CA-03-412 (E.D.Va. filed Dec. 5, 2003 & entered Dec. 8,- 2003); see also San-Miguel v. Dove, 291 F.3d 257 (4th Cir.) (holding that rule announced in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), does not apply retroactively to cases on collateral review regardless of whether action is filed under § 2241 or 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000)), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 938,123 S.Ct. 46,154 L.Ed.2d 242 (2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED