Case Name: Rose M. O'Neil, Respondent, v. Metropolitan Street Railway Company, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1906-06-19
Citations: 185 N.Y. 599
Docket Number: 
Parties: Rose M. O’Neil, Respondent, v. Metropolitan Street Railway Company, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 185
Pages: 599–600

Head Matter:
Rose M. O’Neil, Respondent, v. Metropolitan Street Railway Company, Appellant.
O’Nell v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co., 103 App. Div. 607, affirmed
(Argued May 25, 1906;
decided June 19, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 16, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and, an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries. alleged to have been sustained through the negligence of the defendant.
Charles F. Brown, Bayard Id. Ames and Henry A. Robinson for appellant.
George H Hart for respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Werner and Hiscock, J J. Not sitting: Gray, J.. Absent: O'Brien, J.