Case Name: Humberto PEREZ, Appellant, v. H & J TRANSFER and Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-11-20
Citations: 683 So. 2d 191
Docket Number: No. 96-665
Parties: Humberto PEREZ, Appellant, v. H & J TRANSFER and Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, Appellees.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, GERSTEN and SHEVIN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 683
Pages: 191–191

Head Matter:
Humberto PEREZ, Appellant, v. H & J TRANSFER and Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, Appellees.
No. 96-665.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 20, 1996.
Humberto Perez, in proper person.
John D. Maher, Tallahassee, for appellees.
Before BARKDULL, GERSTEN and SHEVIN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
A review of the record demonstrates that Appellant has not asserted good cause why his appeal to the Commission should be reinstated. Compare Applegate v. National Health Care Affiliates, Inc., 667 So.2d 332 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)(reverse and remand for healing to determine if appellant's failure to timely file appeal was due to late receipt of order appealed from); Holmes v. City of West Palm Beach, 627 So.2d 52 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)(same).
Dismissal affirmed.