Case Name: Modesto Reyes RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1993-02-24
Citations: 848 S.W.2d 141
Docket Number: No. 1157-92
Parties: Modesto Reyes RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
Judges: WHITE, J., joins this opinion.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 848
Pages: 141–142

Head Matter:
Modesto Reyes RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
No. 1157-92.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.
Feb. 24, 1993.
Grady L. Roberts, Jr., Pearsall, for appellant.
Use D. Bailey,' County Atty., Pro Tern, Kerrville, Robert Huttash, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
OPINION ON STATE'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
CAMPBELL, Judge.
A jury found appellant guilty of driving while intoxicated, and assessed punishment at 180 days in jail, probated for two years, and a fine of $500. The Court of Appeals reversed appellant's conviction, finding that the trial court had erred in the procedure he used for polling the jury. Rodriguez v. State, 830 S.W.2d 282 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1992).
This Court granted the State's petition for discretionary review to decide whether the Court of Appeals properly interpreted articles 37.01, 37.05 and 37.10 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as they apply to the receipt of jury verdicts. After careful review of the petition and the opinion of the Court of Appeals, we have determined that the state's petition for discretionary review was improvidently granted. Accordingly, it is dismissed.