Case Name: Bernice WITTMAACK and Chester Wittmaack, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Terry ARNOLD, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1997-12-09
Citations: 963 S.W.2d 267
Docket Number: No. 71840
Parties: Bernice WITTMAACK and Chester Wittmaack, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Terry ARNOLD, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANE, P.J., and RHODES RUSSELL and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 963
Pages: 267–268

Head Matter:
Bernice WITTMAACK and Chester Wittmaack, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Terry ARNOLD, Defendant/Respondent.
No. 71840.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Dec. 9, 1997.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Feb. 9, 1998.
Application for Transfer Denied March 24, 1998.
Ray A. Gerritzen, Gerritzen & Gerritzen, St. Louis, for appellant.
Thomas M. Pavelko, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before CRANE, P.J., and RHODES RUSSELL and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict for defendant in negligence ease arising out of a rear-end automobile collision. There is sufficient evidence to support the jury verdict. No error of law appears.
An opinion reciting the detañed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons' for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).