Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julietta CASTANEDA-CAMPOS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-01-21
Citations: 58 F. App'x 682
Docket Number: No. 02-30176; D.C. No. CR-01-05639-1-FDB
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julietta CASTANEDA-CAMPOS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 58
Pages: 682–683

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julietta CASTANEDA-CAMPOS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-30176.
D.C. No. CR-01-05639-1-FDB.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 13, 2003.
Decided Jan. 21, 2003.
Before BEEZER, KLEINFELD, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Julietta Castaneda-Campos appeals the sentence imposed following her guilty plea to three counts of distribution of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for plain error a sentencing court's decision not to hold an evidentiary hearing when a defendant has not requested one. United States v. Berry, 258 F.3d 971, 976 (9th Cir.2001). We affirm.
The district court did not err by failing to conduct an evidentiary hearing to determine if Castaneda-Campos qualified for the safety-valve provision because she conceded at the sentencing hearing that her two prior convictions disqualified her. See U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2(a)(l); United States v. Washman, 128 F.3d 1305, 1307-08 (9th Cir.1997).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.