Case Name: Mark WEINSTOCK, Appellant, v. CITY OF PLANTATION, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-12-13
Citations: 664 So. 2d 66
Docket Number: No. 94-2434
Parties: Mark WEINSTOCK, Appellant, v. CITY OF PLANTATION, Appellee.
Judges: GLICKSTEIN, WARNER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 664
Pages: 66–66

Head Matter:
Mark WEINSTOCK, Appellant, v. CITY OF PLANTATION, Appellee.
No. 94-2434.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Dec. 13, 1995.
Edna L. Caruso of Caruso, Burlington, Bohn & Compiani, P.A., West Palm Beach, and Marvin B. Nodel of Abramowitz & Pomerantz, Sunrise, for appellant.
Bruce Johnson and Michael R. Piper of Johnson, Anselmo, Murdoch, Burke & George, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We reverse and remand for a new trial on future economic damages only. See Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Tompkins, 651 So.2d 89 (Fla.1995). Albeit harmless, the errors asserted in appellant's third and fourth issues on appeal are not to be repeated. We find no reversible error on these two issues nor any of the remaining issues not discussed hereinabove and affirm as to same.
GLICKSTEIN, WARNER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.