Case Name: CARPENTER, Exrx, Etc v. EHRAT et
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1933-11-10
Citations: 16 Ohio Law Abs. 240
Docket Number: 
Parties: CARPENTER, Exrx, Etc v EHRAT et
Judges: HAMILTON, PJ, concurs.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 16
Pages: 240–240

Head Matter:
CARPENTER, Exrx, Etc v EHRAT et
Ohio Appeals, 1st Dist, Clermont Co
Decided Nov 10, 1933
Davis, Ely & Ely, Batavia, for plaintiff.
Harry H. Baker, for defendants.

Opinion:
OPINION
By ROSS, J.
An examination of the will shows that no trust is involved, nor is the executrix to perform any duties which would not be performed by an executrix.
This court, therefore has no jurisdiction to consider the case on appeal, under the powers conferred in Article IV, §6 of the Ohio Constitution. Crowley, Admr. v Crowley et, 124 Oh St, 454. McDiarmid, Trustee v McGrew et, 43 Oh Ap 449, (Ohio Bar Report, January 16, 1933), (12 Abs 190). The appeal is dismissed.
HAMILTON, PJ, concurs.