Case Name: Brian LaPaglia, an Infant, by His Father and Natural Guardian, Vincent LaPaglia, et al., Respondents, v. Sears Roebuck & Co., Inc., et al., Appellants, and John J. Ryan et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1989-05-02
Citations: 74 N.Y.2d 624
Docket Number: 
Parties: Brian LaPaglia, an Infant, by His Father and Natural Guardian, Vincent LaPaglia, et al., Respondents, v Sears Roebuck & Co., Inc., et al., Appellants, and John J. Ryan et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 74
Pages: 624–624

Head Matter:
Brian LaPaglia, an Infant, by His Father and Natural Guardian, Vincent LaPaglia, et al., Respondents, v Sears Roebuck & Co., Inc., et al., Appellants, and John J. Ryan et al., Respondents.
Submitted February 21, 1989;
decided May 2, 1989

Opinion:
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as affirmed Supreme Court's order denying defendants' motion to vacate the judgment, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.