Case Name: Donald J. NAIRN, Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Company, Federal Pacific Electric Company, General Electric Company, I-T-E Circuit Breaker Company and Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Petitioners, v. Honorable Thomas J. CLARY, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and Honorable George H. Boldt, Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania by special designation
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1963-01-23
Citations: 312 F.2d 748
Docket Number: No. 14301
Parties: Donald J. NAIRN, Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Company, Federal Pacific Electric Company, General Electric Company, I-T-E Circuit Breaker Company and Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Petitioners, v. Honorable Thomas J. CLARY, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and Honorable George H. Boldt, Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania by special designation.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 312
Pages: 748–748

Head Matter:
Donald J. NAIRN, Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Company, Federal Pacific Electric Company, General Electric Company, I-T-E Circuit Breaker Company and Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Petitioners, v. Honorable Thomas J. CLARY, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and Honorable George H. Boldt, Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania by special designation.
No. 14301.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 17, 1963.
Decided Jan. 23, 1963.
Rehearing Denied March 1, 1963.
As Amended March 13, 1963.
W. Bradley Ward and Edward W. Mul-linix, Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioners.
Harold E. Kohn and Aaron M. Fine, Philadelphia, Pa., for respondents.
Before STALEY, HASTIE and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the petition for writs of mandamus and prohibition in the above entitled case, and of the memorandum in opposition thereto, and it appearing from the allegations in the petition that the petitioners lack standing to litigate the issues raised by the petition,
. It is ORDERED that the prayer of the petitioners that this Court issue its writs of mandamus and prohibition to the respondents directing them, respectively, to vacate their orders of October 23, 1962 and January 7, 1963 be and it hereby is denied.