Case Name: Charles W. WALKER, Sr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Mildred RIVERA, Warden FCI Estill, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-03-01
Citations: 468 F. App'x 341
Docket Number: No. 11-7425
Parties: Charles W. WALKER, Sr., Petitioner—Appellant, v. Mildred RIVERA, Warden FCI Estill, Respondent—Appellee.
Judges: Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 468
Pages: 341–342

Head Matter:
Charles W. WALKER, Sr., Petitioner—Appellant, v. Mildred RIVERA, Warden FCI Estill, Respondent—Appellee.
No. 11-7425.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 22, 2012.
Decided: March 1, 2012.
Charles W. Walker, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Charles W. Walker, Sr. appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2011) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Walker v. Rivera, 820 F.Supp.2d 709 (D.S.C.2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.