Case Name: The State, ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer et al., Appellees, v. Court of Common Pleas of Clermont County; Ringland, Judge, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1989-04-26
Citations: 42 Ohio St. 3d 82
Docket Number: No. 88-1124
Parties: The State, ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer et al., Appellees, v. Court of Common Pleas of Clermont County; Ringland, Judge, Appellant.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Re snick, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 42
Pages: 82–82

Head Matter:
The State, ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer et al., Appellees, v. Court of Common Pleas of Clermont County; Ringland, Judge, Appellant.
[Cite as State, ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer, v. Court of Common Pleas of Clermont Cty. (1989), 42 Ohio St. 3d 82.]
(No. 88-1124
Submitted February 8, 1989
Decided April 26, 1989.)
Keating, Muething & Klekamp and Richard L. Creighton, Jr., for appellee Cincinnati Enquirer.
Wood & Lamping and William R. Ellis, for appellee Cincinnati Post.
George E. Pattison, prosecuting attorney, and Thomas L. Blust, for appellant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Appellees have withdrawn their request for access to the transcript and identification of the witness. We cannot simply dismiss the appeal, however, for that would leave appellant bound by the judgment of the court of appeals, whether appellees desire that judgment's enforcement or not.
Accordingly, we remand this cause to the court of appeals for further proceedings.
Cause remanded.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Re snick, JJ., concur.