Case Name: Debbie M. KENT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-04-17
Citations: 755 So. 2d 805
Docket Number: No. 1D99-2295
Parties: Debbie M. KENT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: MINER, WEBSTER and LAWRENCE, JJ., CONCUR.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 755
Pages: 805–806

Head Matter:
Debbie M. KENT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D99-2295.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
April 17, 2000.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; David A. Davis, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; Thomas D. Winokur and Charmaine Millsaps, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this direct criminal appeal, the sole issue raised by appellant was not preserved for review because the argument made on appeal was not made in the trial court. § 924.051(l)(b) & (3), Fla. Stat. (1999). See Terry v. State, 668 So.2d 954, 961 (Fla.1996) ("for an argument to be cognizable on appeal, it must be the specific contention asserted as the legal ground for objection, exception, or motion below"). To the extent any error occurred, it is not "fundamental." Accordingly, we affirm.
AFFIRMED.
MINER, WEBSTER and LAWRENCE, JJ., CONCUR.