Case Name: The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Kittle, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2003-11-12
Citations: 100 Ohio St. 3d 247
Docket Number: Nos. 2003-1292 and 2003-1293
Parties: The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Kittle, Appellant.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 100
Pages: 247–248

Head Matter:
The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Kittle, Appellant.
[Cite as State v. Kittle, 100 Ohio St.3d 247, 2003-Ohio-5759.]
(Nos. 2003-1292 and 2003-1293
Submitted September 23, 2003
Decided November 12, 2003.)

Opinion:
{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is allowed on Proposition of Law No. 3 only.
{¶ 2} The certification of conflict is accepted.
{¶ 3} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with State v. Comer, 99 Ohio St.3d 463, 2003-Ohio-4165, 793 N.E.2d 473.
Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, O'Connor and O'Donnell, JJ., concur.
Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.