Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerome FRIERSON-BEY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-07-23
Citations: 610 F. App'x 941
Docket Number: No. 14-15162
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerome FRIERSON-BEY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before HULL, MARCUS and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 610
Pages: 941–942

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerome FRIERSON-BEY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 14-15162
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
July 23, 2015.
R. Brian Tanner, Edward J. Tarver, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Savannah, GA, Christopher Clark, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Augusta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Jerome Frierson-Bey, Fort Dix, NJ, pro se.
Before HULL, MARCUS and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
John E. Price, appointed counsel for Jerome Frierson-Bey in this criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's revocation judgment is AFFIRMED.