Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Scottie P. LEDFORD, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-06-17
Citations: 36 F. App'x 534
Docket Number: No. 01-8034
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Scottie P. LEDFORD, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 36
Pages: 534–534

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Scottie P. LEDFORD, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 01-8034.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 16, 2002.
Decided June 17, 2002.
Scottie P. Ledford, Appellant Pro Se. Harold Watson Gowdy, III, Office of the United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Scottie P. Ledford seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeala-bility and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Ledford, Nos. CR-99-259; CA-00-3027-6-13 (D.S.C. Oct. 9, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.