Case Name: Altagracia Grullon, Respondent, v. Queens Ballpark Company, L.L.C., et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2016-05-03
Citations: 139 A.D.3d 427
Docket Number: 
Parties: Altagracia Grullon, Respondent, v Queens Ballpark Company, L.L.C., et al., Appellants.
Judges: Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Friedman, Andrias, Moskowitz and Kahn, JJ.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 139
Pages: 427–428

Head Matter:
Altagracia Grullon, Respondent, v Queens Ballpark Company, L.L.C., et al., Appellants.
[29 NYS3d 169]

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Norma Ruiz, J.), entered April 1, 2014, which denied defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff alleges that she was injured when, while leaving Citifield, she tripped over an unevenness in the concrete on an exit ramp. Defendant Queens Ballpark Company admits that it created the condition as part of the construction process, but asserts that it was de minimis and could not have caused plaintiff's fall. Plaintiff's testimony is that the unevenness in the concrete was at least two inches and caused her fall. Under these circumstances, defendants' motion was properly denied because, as the motion court concluded, credibility determinations are not properly made on a motion for summary judgment (see Dauman Displays v Masturzo, 168 AD2d 204 [1st Dept 1990], lv dismissed 77 NY2d 939 [1991]).
Defendant Sterling Mets, L.P.'s argument that it neither owned, maintained, or controlled the premises is a fact-based argument that cannot be raised for the first time on appeal (see Start El., Inc. v New York City Hous. Auth., 106 AD3d 450 [1st Dept 2013]).
We have considered defendants' remaining arguments and find them unavailing.
Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Friedman, Andrias, Moskowitz and Kahn, JJ.