Case Name: ELWOOD, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1982-12-22
Citations: 61 Or. App. 134
Docket Number: No. 82-AB-186, CA A24249
Parties: ELWOOD, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION, Respondent.
Judges: Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Young, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 61
Pages: 134–135

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted November 19,
affirmed in part and remanded December 22, 1982
ELWOOD, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION, Respondent.
(No. 82-AB-186, CA A24249)
655 P2d 225
Kenneth D. Peterson, Jr., Hermiston, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.
Michael D. Reynolds, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, Stanton F. Long, Deputy Attorney General, William F. Gary, Solicitor General, and Daryl D. Wilson, Assistant Attorney General, Salem.
Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Young, Judges.
PER CURIAM.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
This is an unemployment compensation case in which petitioner, a compensation recipient, was found knowingly to have omitted to report a material fact in connection with his claim for benefits. He was ordered by the Employment Appeals Board to repay $3,174 in benefits. He seeks judicial review on the merits and as to the amount of the repayment. On the merits, the Board's order is affirmed. As to the amount of repayment, the respondent confesses error. Pursuant to that concession, the case is remanded to the Board with instructions to modify the amount of petitioner's repayment to $2,484.