Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clifford Lee WILLARD, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-04-15
Citations: 61 F. App'x 437
Docket Number: No. 01-10541; D.C. No. CR-97-05039-MDC
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clifford Lee WILLARD, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before RYMER, KLEINFELD, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 61
Pages: 437–438

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clifford Lee WILLARD, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 01-10541.
D.C. No. CR-97-05039-MDC.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 7, 2003.
Decided April 15, 2003.
Before RYMER, KLEINFELD, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Clifford Lee Willard appeals the 168-month sentence imposed on remand following his jury conviction for transporting a minor with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity, traveling with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2423(a) and 2423(b), and possessing and transferring a false identification document. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a). We review de novo, United States v. Karterman, 60 F.3d 576, 583 (9th Cir.1995), and we affirm.
Willard contends that the district court failed to comply with Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(c) by not stating the reasons for its finding of criminal sexual abuse warranting application of U.S.S.G. § 2A3.1. Upon review of the record, we find no error. See id. (holding that sentencing court satisfies Rule 32(c) where it adequately states and explains the disputed issue in the case).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.