Case Name: Ras Adisa Gamba OLUWA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA BOARD OF PRISON TERMS; et al., Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-07-19
Citations: 235 F. App'x 438
Docket Number: No. 05-56451
Parties: Ras Adisa Gamba OLUWA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA BOARD OF PRISON TERMS; et al., Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: Before: LEAVY, THOMAS and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 235
Pages: 438–438

Head Matter:
Ras Adisa Gamba OLUWA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA BOARD OF PRISON TERMS; et al., Respondents-Appellees.
No. 05-56451.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit..
Submitted July 9, 2007 .
Filed July 19, 2007.
Ras Adisa Gamba Oluwa, Crescent City, CA, pro se.
George H. Williamson, DAG, AGCA-Offiee of the California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondents-Appellees.
Before: LEAVY, THOMAS and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
California state prisoner Ras Adisa Gamba Oluwa appeals pro se from the district court judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition as second or successive. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.
Oluwa contends that 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b) does not apply to petitions challenging state prison administrative decisions. We reject this contention. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b); cf. White v. Lambert, 370 F.3d 1002, 1011 (9th Cir.2004) (contrasting the text of § 2244(b) with the text of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) in determining that the latter does not apply to challenges to prison administrative decisions).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.