Case Name: Shirley FORNEY, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Joseph FORNEY, et al., Defendants/Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-03-02
Citations: 2 S.W.3d 813
Docket Number: Nos. 73625, 73810
Parties: Shirley FORNEY, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Joseph FORNEY, et al., Defendants/Respondents.
Judges: Before PAUL J. SIMON, P.J. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 2
Pages: 813–814

Head Matter:
Shirley FORNEY, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Joseph FORNEY, et al., Defendants/Respondents.
Nos. 73625, 73810.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
March 2, 1999.
Rehearing Denied May 5, 1999.
Shirley Forney, St. Louis, pro se.
Russell J. Kruse, Mitchell & Kruse, LLP, Palmyra, John W. Briscoe, Briscoe & Henderson, New London, Mike Green-well, Shelbina, for respondent.
Before PAUL J. SIMON, P.J. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Shirley Forney, appellant, appeals a judgment in the estate of Jesse Forney (decedent) of the Circuit Court of Marion County, Probate Division contending that the court erred in: (1) overruling his predecessor, the Honorable Judge Ogle, and removing appellant as co-representative of the estate of decedent; (2) allowing appellant's attorney to withdraw seven days pri- or to the hearing on appellant's post-trial motion and objections to final settlement without granting a continuance; and (3) approving the final settlement and distribution over appellant's objections when decedent's estate is a distributee of the estate of Pearl Forney (mother), which has motions pending. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that no error of law appears. As an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum solely for the use of the parties has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.