Case Name: A. F. YOUNG, Appellant, v. GRISWOLD MANUFACTURING CO., Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1928-01-12
Citations: 23 F.2d 1007
Docket Number: No. 3710
Parties: A. F. YOUNG, Appellant, v. GRISWOLD MANUFACTURING CO., Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 23
Pages: 1007–1007

Head Matter:
A. F. YOUNG, Appellant, v. GRISWOLD MANUFACTURING CO., Appellee.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
January 12, 1928.
No. 3710.
Ballard Moore, of Chicago, Ill., Fraley & Paul, of Philadelphia, Pa., and Cheever & Cox, of Chicago, Ill., for appellant.
Hugh C. Lord, of Erie, Pa., for appellee.
Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAYIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The questions involved in this patent case are simply whether the patent involved invention and whether defendants infringe. All-important as these are to the litigants, the case involves no legal principles or patent law practice, and therefore nothing of interest to the profession or patentees generally. The judge below has exhaustively discussed the prior art and wherein this patentee inventively improved' upon it. The ease has had further full consideration by this court, and we are in full accord with the trial judge on the issues of invention and infringement.
In view of these facts, we find no warrant for another opinion, and therefore limit ourselves to affirming the decree below.