Case Name: Richard MORRIS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patricia STANSBERY, Respondent-Appellee, and United States of America; United States Parole Commission, Respondents
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-08-26
Citations: 141 F. App'x 232
Docket Number: No. 05-6432
Parties: Richard MORRIS, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Patricia STANSBERY, Respondent—Appellee, and United States of America; United States Parole Commission, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 141
Pages: 232–232

Head Matter:
Richard MORRIS, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Patricia STANSBERY, Respondent—Appellee, and United States of America; United States Parole Commission, Respondents.
No. 05-6432.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 17, 2005.
Decided: Aug. 26, 2005.
Richard Morris, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, . Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Richard Morris, a federal parolee, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Morris v. Stansbery, No. CA-04-147-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 9, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED