Case Name: City of Miami, a municipal corporation, Plaintiff in Error, v. J. E. Rose & Company, a corporation, Defendant in Error
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1929-01-31
Citations: 97 Fla. 125
Docket Number: 
Parties: City of Miami, a municipal corporation, Plaintiff in Error, v. J. E. Rose & Company, a corporation, Defendant in Error.
Judges: Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 97
Pages: 125–126

Head Matter:
City of Miami, a municipal corporation, Plaintiff in Error, v. J. E. Rose & Company, a corporation, Defendant in Error.
Division B.
Decision filed January 31, 1929.
John W. Watson, Jr. and Chas E. Davis, for Plaintiff in in Error;
Twyman & McCarthy and Robert II. Anderson, for Defendant in Error.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, con sidered, ordered and adjudged by tbe Court that the said judgment of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.