Case Name: ROHNER GEHRIG COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TRI-STATE MOTOR TRANSIT, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1991-04-29
Citations: 931 F.2d 291
Docket Number: No. 89-6246
Parties: ROHNER GEHRIG COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TRI-STATE MOTOR TRANSIT, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before CLARK, Chief Judge, POLITZ, KING, JOHNSON, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHÉ, WIENER and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 931
Pages: 291–292

Head Matter:
ROHNER GEHRIG COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TRI-STATE MOTOR TRANSIT, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 89-6246.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 29, 1991.
Stuart W. Lapp, Chris C. Pappas, Dunn, Kacal, Adams, Pappas & Law, Houston, Tex., and Thomas V. Bender, Kyle E. Krull, Linde Thomsom Langworthy Kohn & Van Dyke, P.C., Kansas City, Mo., for defendant-appellant.
A. Douglas Shackelford, Jr., Billings & Solomon, Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appel-lee.

Opinion:
On Petition for Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc.
(Opinion February 15, 1991, 5 Cir., 1991, 923 F.2d 1118).
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, POLITZ, KING, JOHNSON, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHÉ, WIENER and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.