Case Name: In the Matter of Schenley Industries, Inc., Respondent, v. Herbert Allen et al., Individually and as Partners Doing Business under the Name of Allen & Co., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1966-04-28
Citations: 25 A.D.2d 742
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Schenley Industries, Inc., Respondent, v. Herbert Allen et al., Individually and as Partners Doing Business under the Name of Allen & Co., Appellants.
Judges: Concur — -Rabin, J. P., McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 25
Pages: 742–743

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Schenley Industries, Inc., Respondent, v. Herbert Allen et al., Individually and as Partners Doing Business under the Name of Allen & Co., Appellants.

Opinion:
Order entered February 24, 1966, granting examination of respondents in order to frame a complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, with $30 costs and disbursements to respondents-appellants, the motion denied and the application dismissed. In order to obtain an examination to frame a complaint, plaintiff; should present facts fairly-indicating a cause of action against the adverse party. (Cotler v. Retail Credit Co., 18 A D 2d 898.) There is no such showing here.
Concur — -Rabin, J. P., McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.