Case Name: Kelly SCOTT, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1968-03-06
Citations: 424 S.W.2d 641
Docket Number: No. 41113
Parties: Kelly SCOTT, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 424
Pages: 641–642

Head Matter:
Kelly SCOTT, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
No. 41113.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
March 6, 1968.
Donald D. Koons, Dallas (On Appeal Only), for appellant.
Henry Wade, Dist. Atty., Charles Caper-ton, Arch Pardue and Kerry P. Fitzgerald, Asst. Dist. Attys., Dallas, and Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
OPINION
MORRISON, Judge.
The offense is burglary with two prior non-capital felony convictions alleged for enhancement; the punishment, life.
Appellant's attorney on appeal asserts as ground of error # 1 that the trial court erred in admitting fingerprint comparison testimony. No objection was interposed at the time the identification officer testified, so nothing is presented for review. Barfield v. State, 43 S.W.2d 106; McCue v. State, 75 Tex.Cr.R. 137, 170 S.W. 280; Bonds v. State, 71 Tex.Cr.R. 408, 160 S.W. 100; and Coleman v. State, 68 Tex.Cr.R. 182, 150 S.W. 1177. See also Robles v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 411 S.W.2d 729.
He next contends that the court erred in his charge. No objections were presented to the trial court, and therefore, likewise, nothing is presented for review.
The judgment is affirmed.