Case Name: Doreen SHING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WAL MART CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-08-01
Citations: 667 F. App'x 423
Docket Number: No. 16-1563
Parties: Doreen SHING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WAL MART CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge,
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 667
Pages: 423–424

Head Matter:
Doreen SHING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WAL MART CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 16-1563
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 28, 2016
Decided: August 1, 2016
Doreen Shing, Appellant Pro Se. Rachelle Elizabeth Hill, Kevin Michael Kra-ham, LITTLER MENDELSON PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge,

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Doreen Shing appeals the district court's order dismissing her complaint alleging vi olations of the Americans with Disabilities Act for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Shing v. Wal Mart Corp., No. 1:16-cv-00322-CCB (D. Md. May 6, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED