Case Name: Georgia J. Gray HASINGER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert E. WEIMER, Rose Weimer, Continental Insurance Company and Government Employees Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees, Granite State Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1963-06-20
Citations: 155 So. 2d 220
Docket Number: No. 9969
Parties: Georgia J. Gray HASINGER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert E. WEIMER, Rose Weimer, Continental Insurance Company and Government Employees Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees, Granite State Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before HARDY, GLADNEY and AYRES, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 155
Pages: 220–221

Head Matter:
Georgia J. Gray HASINGER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert E. WEIMER, Rose Weimer, Continental Insurance Company and Government Employees Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees, Granite State Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant
No. 9969.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.
June 20, 1963.
Rehearing Denied July 12, 1963.
Mayer & Smith, Shreveport, for Granite State Ins. Co.
Lynch & Rogers, Shreveport, for Georgia J. Gray Hasinger.
Love & Rigby, Shreveport, for Robert E. Weimer and Rose Weimer.
Lunn, Irion, Switzer, Trichel & Johnson, Shreveport, for Continental Ins. Co.
Cook, Clark, Egan, Yancey & King, Shreveport, for Government Employees Ins. Co.
Before HARDY, GLADNEY and AYRES, JJ.

Opinion:
HARDY, Judge.
This is a suit by plaintiff for the recovery of damages in the nature of personal injuries and is related to and has been consolidated with the suit entitled Pel-State Oil Company, Inc. v. Weimer et al., 155 So.2d 218.
This appeal is prosecuted by Granite State Insurance Company from judgment sustaining an exception of no cause of action on behalf of plaintiff which was interposed to appellant's reconventional claim for reformation of its contract of insurance with Robert E. Weimer.
The issue involved is identical with that which has been considered in the consolidated case, and for the reasons set forth in our opinion therein, the judgment appealed from is affirmed at appellant's cost.