Case Name: Brian Scott CHRISTY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2015-06-29
Citations: 183 So. 3d 1108
Docket Number: No. 4D14-1635
Parties: Brian Scott CHRISTY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: DAMOORGIAN, C.J., GERBER and FORST, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 183
Pages: 1108–1109

Head Matter:
Brian Scott CHRISTY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D14-1635.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
June 29, 2015.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Aan T. Lipson, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Alen R. Geesey, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Brian Scott Christy, appeals his sentence of five years in prison following his conviction for a non-forcible, third degree felony. Because the trial court failed to make written findings that a non-state prison sanction could present a "danger to the public," pursuant to section 775.082(10), Florida Statutes (2014), we reverse and remand for resentencing.
By way of background, Appellant was convicted of one count of knowingly giving false verification of ownership to a pawnbroker pursuant to section 539.001(8)(b)8.a., Florida Statutes (2013). Because Appellant was convicted of a non-forcible, third degree felony, and scored less than 22 points on his Criminal Punishment Code seoresheet, the trial court was required to make written findings that a nonstate prison sanction could pose a danger to the public before sentencing Appellant to a prison term. See § 775.082(10), Fla. Stat. The trial court, however, failed to make such written findings. This, as conceded by the State on appeal, was error.
In Bryant v. State, 148 So.3d 1251, 1258 (Fla.2014), the Supreme Court held that under section 775.082(10), a sentence in excess of a nonstate prison sanction constitutes an upward departure sentence. " "When an appellate court reverses a departure sentence because there were no written reasons, the court must remand for resentencing with no possibility of departure from the guidelines.' " Id. at 1256 (quoting Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554, 556 (Fla.1990)).
Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the trial court to resentence Appellant to a nonstate prison sanction, consistent with section 775.082(10) and Bryant.
Reversed and remanded.
DAMOORGIAN, C.J., GERBER and FORST, JJ., concur.