Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Frederick H. Phelps, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1986-02-19
Citations: 67 N.Y.2d 746
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Frederick H. Phelps, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 67
Pages: 746–747

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Frederick H. Phelps, Appellant.
Decided February 19, 1986
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Frederick H. Phelps, appellant pro se.
No appearance for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order af firmed. Inasmuch as defendant did not object to the admissibility of the radar reading, the issue is not preserved for our review (CPL 470.05). With respect to the failure of the District Attorney to file any submission, we call attention to County Law § 700 and People v Wright (22 AD2d 754, affd 16 NY2d 736, cert denied 384 US 972).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr.