Case Name: Marie Catalanello and Others, Respondents, v. Cudahy Packing Co., Appellant, and Paul Turtola, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Roma Provisions, Appellant, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1942-04-06
Citations: 264 A.D. 723
Docket Number: 
Parties: Marie Catalanello and Others, Respondents, v. Cudahy Packing Co., Appellant, and Paul Turtola, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Roma Provisions, Appellant, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 264
Pages: 723–723

Head Matter:
Marie Catalanello and Others, Respondents, v. Cudahy Packing Co., Appellant, and Paul Turtola, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Roma Provisions, Appellant, Respondent.

Opinion:
In an action by plaintiffs against defendant packer and defendant retailer to recover damages for injuries sustained from eating a processed salami which contained trichin®, a finding by the trial court that defendant packer improperly applied a recognized method for the destruction of trichin® in the curing of its product was not against the weight of evidence; nor was its finding that plaintiffs were free from contributory negligence. The violation by defendants of the duty imposed upon them by sections 199-a and 200 of the Agriculture and Markets Law not to process or sell an article of food which is adulterated constituted an actionable wrong. The salami, processed by defendant packer for consumption without cooking or further processing and so sold by defendant retailer to one of the plaintiffs, and found by the trial court to contain trichin® sufficient to render plaintiffs ill, would be deemed adulterated so as to be unfit for food within the meaning of subdivision 3 of section 200 of the Agriculture and Markets Law. Since the salami was unfit for food there was also a breach of the implied warranty of the fitness of food for human consumption, and recovery over by defendant retailer against defendant packer was properly allowed. Judgment, in so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ.