Case Name: Patricia Rawls PAXTON, Individually and as Tutrix of Her Minor Child, Constance Tiffany Paxton, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Wanda Faye SANDERSON and Lloyd Sanderson, Defendants-Appellants, State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., Defendant-Appellee
Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 2000-07-12
Citations: 763 So. 2d 638
Docket Number: No. 32,313-CA
Parties: Patricia Rawls PAXTON, Individually and as Tutrix of Her Minor Child, Constance Tiffany Paxton, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Wanda Faye SANDERSON and Lloyd Sanderson, Defendants-Appellants, State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before BROWN, STEWART, GASKINS, CARAWAY and DREW, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 763
Pages: 638–638

Head Matter:
Patricia Rawls PAXTON, Individually and as Tutrix of Her Minor Child, Constance Tiffany Paxton, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Wanda Faye SANDERSON and Lloyd Sanderson, Defendants-Appellants, State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 32,313-CA.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.
July 12, 2000.
Wright & Underwood by Bobby N. Underwood, Monroe, Counsel for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
Hudson, Potts & Bernstein by Gordon L. James, Monroe, Counsel for Defendants-Appellants.
Cotton, Bolton, Hoychick, & Doughty by John Hoychick, Jr., Rayville, Counsel for Defendant-Appellee, State Farm.
Before BROWN, STEWART, GASKINS, CARAWAY and DREW, JJ.

Opinion:
BROWN, J.
This case is back before us on remand from the supreme court, which found that an exclusion which it previously held to be ambiguous was nonetheless clear under the particular facts involved in this case. See Paxton v. Sanderson, 00-0587 (La.04/28/00), 761 So.2d 503.
For the reasons set forth in Judge Gas-kins' original dissent, we affirm the judgment of the trial court granting summary judgment and dismissing plaintiffs' claims.