Case Name: Thomas Cruz BANEGAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-12-27
Citations: 571 So. 2d 126
Docket Number: No. 90-395
Parties: Thomas Cruz BANEGAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: COBB, GRIFFIN and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 571
Pages: 126–126

Head Matter:
Thomas Cruz BANEGAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 90-395.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Dec. 27, 1990.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Barbara L. Condon, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We AFFIRM the lower court. However, as we did in Flowers v. State, 567 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990), we certify to the supreme court the following question:
DO FLORIDA'S UNIFORM SENTENCING GUIDELINES REQUIRE THAT LEGAL CONSTRAINT POINTS BE ASSESSED FOR EACH OFFENSE COMMITTED WHILE UNDER LEGAL CONSTRAINT?
AFFIRMED.
COBB, GRIFFIN and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.