Case Name: In the Matter of the Compensation of Todd M. Brodigan, Claimant. Todd M. BRODIGAN, Petitioner on Review, v. ESCO CORPORATION, Respondent on Review, and DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND BUSINESS SERVICES, Intervenor
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1995-05-11
Citations: 321 Or. 98
Docket Number: WCB 91-12483; CA A79676; SC S41598
Parties: In the Matter of the Compensation of Todd M. Brodigan, Claimant. Todd M. BRODIGAN, Petitioner on Review, v. ESCO CORPORATION, Respondent on Review, and DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND BUSINESS SERVICES, Intervenor.
Judges: 
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 321
Pages: 98–98

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted March 7,
review dismissed as improvidently allowed May 11, 1995
In the Matter of the Compensation of Todd M. Brodigan, Claimant. Todd M. BRODIGAN, Petitioner on Review, v. ESCO CORPORATION, Respondent on Review, and DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND BUSINESS SERVICES, Intervenor.
(WCB 91-12483; CA A79676; SC S41598)
893 P2d 1049
Kevin Keaney, ofPozzi Wilson Atchison, Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner on review.
Craig A. Staples, of Roberts, Reinisch, Mackenzie, Healey & Wilson, P.C., Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent on review.
Richard D. Wasserman, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for intervenor. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Review dismissed as improvidently allowed.