Case Name: HERZFELD et al. v. REINACH
Court: New York Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1899-02
Citations: 57 N.Y.S. 669
Docket Number: 
Parties: HERZFELD et al. v. REINACH.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 57
Pages: 669–669

Head Matter:
(26 Misc. Rep. 489.)
HERZFELD et al. v. REINACH.
(Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County.
February, 1899.)
Costs—Teem Fee.
The four-months term fee is properly disallowed, though the case-was on the calendar four months, exclusive of the one at which it was disposed of; plaintiff having, subsequently thereto, served an amended complaint, so that the old issue was destroyed.
Action by Felix Herzfeld and others against Max Beinach. Heard on motion to retax costs.
Denied.
S. Feuchtwanger, for the motion.
B. Lewinson, opposed.

Opinion:
GILDEBSLEEVE, J.
This is a motion for the retaxation of costs. The clerk upon the taxation disallowed $40 for term fees, and cut down the referee's fees from $250 to $180. The parties appear to have stipulated that the referee was to have $20 for every hearing that occupied two hours or upward, instead of the statutory fee of $10. The hearing of the reference appears to have taken nine days, of which seven, according to the referee, lasted two hours or more. This would make $160 for the days spent in taking testimony. The referee claims a further sum of $90 for nine days spent in reading over the testimony and making his report. This seems to me to be excessive, as the testimony is not voluminous, nor does it appear that any very difficult questions of law were involved. The referee wrote no opinion, and there is nothing to show that any particular difficulty attended the making of the report. The two days allowed by the clerk seem to be ample time, and the total sum of $180, taxed as referee's fees, is sufficient. The motion, therefore, so far as this item- is concerned, must be denied. The clerk also was right in striking off the $40 term fees, although the case may have been four months, exclusive of the month in which it was disposed of, on the calendar; for, subsequent to these four months, and just before the case was referred, the plaintiff served an amended complaint. The old issue was thereupon destroyed, and the four months' term fees that had previously accrued cannot be allowed. Motion for retaxation denied, without costs.
Motion denied, without costs.