Case Name: Robert L. LOEH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Teofilo WESTON, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-10-15
Citations: 78 F. App'x 569
Docket Number: No. 03-55712
Parties: Robert L. LOEH, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Teofilo WESTON, Respondent—Appellee.
Judges: Before: REINHARDT, FERNANDEZ, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 78
Pages: 569–570

Head Matter:
Robert L. LOEH, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Teofilo WESTON, Respondent—Appellee.
No. 03-55712.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 10, 2003.
Decided Oct. 15, 2003.
Robert L. Loeh, pro se, Fort Leavenworth, KS, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Before: REINHARDT, FERNANDEZ, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
The district court dismissed the Petitioner's complaint sua sponte under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 A(b)(l) on the ground that his claim was duplicative, or frivolous. We review a sua sponte dismissal for abuse of discretion. See Martin v. Sias, 88 F.3d 774, 775 (9th Cir.1996). The district court did not abuse its discretion by taking notice of the Petitioner's similar civil actions pending against the same defendant and dismissing this particular complaint without prejudice to the Petitioner's pending complaints. See Cato v. United States, 70 F.3d 1103, 1105 n. 2 (9th Cir.1995).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.