Case Name: Mike D. LEE, d/b/a Mid-South Investment, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1992-01-03
Citations: 951 F.2d 54
Docket Number: No. 90-4649
Parties: Mike D. LEE, d/b/a Mid-South Investment, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before GOLDBERG, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 951
Pages: 54–54

Head Matter:
Mike D. LEE, d/b/a Mid-South Investment, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 90-4649.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Jan. 3, 1992.
Jesse R. Pierce, Jack O’Neill, Warren W. Harris, Porter & Clements, Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appellant.
David R. McAtee, James D. Piel, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Dallas, Tex., Tom Henson, Donald W. Cothern, Gregory D. Smith, Ramey, Flock, Jeffus, Crawford, Harper & Collins, Tyler, Tex., for defendant-appellee.
Before GOLDBERG, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
IT IS ORDERED that the petition for rehearing filed in the above entitled and numbered cause be and the same is hereby DENIED. The court corrects its opinion to the extent that it erroneously referred to "releases" in the Daingerfield transaction documents, 943 F.2d 554, 560 (5th Cir.1991); the presence or absence of release language does not, however, affect our analysis of the estoppel issue.