Case Name: In the Matter of the Marriage of HAMILTON, Respondent, and HAMILTON, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1986-02-26
Citations: 78 Or. App. 185
Docket Number: 9585; CA A36473
Parties: In the Matter of the Marriage of HAMILTON, Respondent, and HAMILTON, Appellant.
Judges: Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Newman, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 78
Pages: 185–186

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted January 13,
decree modified February 26, 1986
In the Matter of the Marriage of HAMILTON, Respondent, and HAMILTON, Appellant.
(9585; CA A36473)
714 P2d 285
Richard E. Forcum, Bend, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Paul J. Speck and Forcum, Parker & Speck, Bend.
Warren John West, Bend, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.
Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Newman, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Wife appeals a decree of dissolution, challenging several of its provisions. On de novo review we affirm the decree with the exception of paragraph 7, which provides:
"Petitioner [husband] shall have a judgment against Respondent [wife] for delinquent mortgage payments in the sum of $1,135.00."
Husband concedes that the proper amount of the judgment is $900.
Paragraph 7 of the decree is modified by reduction of the judgment to $900; otherwise the decree is affirmed. No costs to either party.