Case Name: HONG ZHANG, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-06-09
Citations: 183 F. App'x 687
Docket Number: No. 05-76142
Parties: HONG ZHANG, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: CANBY, T.G. NELSON and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 183
Pages: 687–688

Head Matter:
HONG ZHANG, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 05-76142.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 5, 2006.
Filed June 9, 2006.
Hong Zhang, Orange, CA, pro se.
CAC — District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Richard M. Evans, Esq., Susan K. Houser, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: CANBY, T.G. NELSON and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
To the extent petitioner is requesting that we review the Board of Immigration Appeals' June 21, 2005 decision, we lack jurisdiction to do so because this petition for review was not filed within 30 days of that decision. Accordingly, respondent's motion to dismiss this petition for review in part is granted. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1); Sheviakov v. INS, 237 F.3d 1144 (9th Cir.2001); Narayan v. INS, 105 F.3d 1335 (9th Cir.1997) (order).
Respondent's motion for summary disposition in part is granted because the remaining question raised by this petition for review is so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard for summary disposition).
DISMISSED in part and DENIED in part.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.