Case Name: Samuel S. Hart, Appellant v. James W. Wilder, et al., Respondents
Court: New York Superior Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1891-03-09
Citations: 27 Jones & S. 582
Docket Number: 
Parties: Samuel S. Hart, Appellant v. James W. Wilder, et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Reports of cases argued and determined in the Superior Court of the city of New York
Volume: 59
Pages: 582–582

Head Matter:
Samuel S. Hart, Appellant v. James W. Wilder, et al., Respondents.
Decided March 9, 1891.
Appeal from a judgment dismissing the complaint oa the -merits entered upon the findings and decision of a; judge on a trial at special term before the court withouha jury.
Cephas Brainerd, Jr., for appellant.
Isaac S. Catlin,for respondents.
Before Sedgwick, Ch. J., and Dugro J.

Opinion:
The question involved was as' to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain plaintiff's cause of action. The Court (per- Curiam) held, that as the trial judge had superior opportunities for the determination of serious doubt upon conflicting evidence some deference should be accorded to-it, and that such deference sufficed to impel an affirmance of the judgment, and affirmed the judgment, with costs. -