Case Name: FRANK E. ROES v. W. H. ARMSTON COMPANY, INC.
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1946-02-05
Citations: 157 Fla. 61
Docket Number: 
Parties: FRANK E. ROES v. W. H. ARMSTON COMPANY, INC.
Judges: CHAPMAN, C. J., BROWN, BUFORD and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 157
Pages: 61–62

Head Matter:
FRANK E. ROES v. W. H. ARMSTON COMPANY, INC.
24 So. (2nd) 802
January Term, 1946
February 5, 1946
En Banc
Rehearing denied February 26, 1946
L. A. Grayson, for appellant.
Raney & Raney and George P. Raney, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
After a careful review of this case, the majority of the Court are of the opinion that the trial judge erred in directing a verdict in favor of the defendant. The judgment is reversed upon the authority of Gravette v. Turner, 77 Fla. 311, 81 So. 476; Smith v. Burdine's Inc., 144 Fla. 500, 189 So. 223, 131 A.L.R. 115 and the cases therein cited; Williams v. Sauls, 151 Fla. 270, 9 So. (2nd) 369, and cases cited in the opinion in that case; Turner v. Modern Beauty Supply Company, 152 Fla. 3, 10 So. (2nd) 488, and Orr v. Avon Florida Citrus Corporation, 130 Fla. 306, 177 So. 612.
Reversed and remanded.
CHAPMAN, C. J., BROWN, BUFORD and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
TERRELL, THOMAS and SEBRING, JJ., dissent.