Case Name: Pearl La Van Allen, Appellant, v. George W. Allen, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1927-11-22
Citations: 246 N.Y. 571
Docket Number: 
Parties: Pearl La Van Allen, Appellant, v. George W. Allen, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 246
Pages: 571–584

Head Matter:
Pearl La Van Allen, Appellant, v. George W. Allen, Respondent.
(Argued October 27, 1927;
decided November 22, 1927
K. Courtenay Johnston for appellant.
Edmund L. Mooney and Wilber W. Chambers, amici curiæ.
Louis M. Kommel, George Boochever and Max Zucker for respondent.
Frederick Collin, amicus curiæ.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the later acts of the Legislature have left unchanged the rule adopted by this court in Schultz v. Schultz (89 N. Y. 644).
Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Crane, Lehman, Kellogg and O'Brien, JJ.; Pound, J., dissents in opinion, in which Andrews, J., concurs.