Case Name: Jose M. ANTUNA II, Appellant, v. Maria A. PEISACH, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-03-05
Citations: 575 So. 2d 753
Docket Number: No. 90-1243
Parties: Jose M. ANTUNA II, Appellant, v. Maria A. PEISACH, Appellee.
Judges: Before NESBITT, BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 575
Pages: 753–754

Head Matter:
Jose M. ANTUNA II, Appellant, v. Maria A. PEISACH, Appellee.
No. 90-1243.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 5, 1991.
E. Christopher DeSantis, Port St. Lucie, for appellant.
Melvyn B. Frumkes & Associates and Greene & Marks and Cynthia Greene, Miami, for appellee.
Before NESBITT, BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197, 1204-1205 (Fla.1980); Azzarelli v. Pupello, 555 So.2d 1276 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Alfrey v. Alfrey, 553 So.2d 393 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Payne v. Payne, 481 So.2d 551 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); § 61.16, Fla.Stat. (1989).