Case Name: JOHN E. CIRASELLA. ET UX. (AND 19 OTHERS), PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. VILLAGE OF SOUTH ORANGE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1959-11-02
Citations: 57 N.J. Super. 522
Docket Number: 
Parties: JOHN E. CIRASELLA. ET UX. (AND 19 OTHERS), PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. VILLAGE OF SOUTH ORANGE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 57
Pages: 522–532

Head Matter:
JOHN E. CIRASELLA. ET UX. (AND 19 OTHERS), PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. VILLAGE OF SOUTH ORANGE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued October 26, 1959
Decided November 2, 1959.
Mr. Arthur L. Troast argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Messrs. McCarter & English, attorneys; Mr. Ward J. Herbert, of counsel).
Mr. Richard M. Sandler argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents (Mr. Alan V. Lowenstein, attorney; Mr. Sandler on the brief).
Before Judges Goldmann, Conford and Freund.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Judge Waugh.