Case Name: In re Jamal A. AZEEZ, Petitioner. Francis M. Curnutte, III, Attorney at Law, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-05-31
Citations: 473 F. App'x 279
Docket Number: No. 12-1029
Parties: In re Jamal A. AZEEZ, Petitioner. Francis M. Curnutte, III, Attorney at Law, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 473
Pages: 279–280

Head Matter:
In re Jamal A. AZEEZ, Petitioner. Francis M. Curnutte, III, Attorney at Law, Respondent.
No. 12-1029.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 18, 2012.
Decided: May 31, 2012.
Jamal A. Azeez, Petitioner Pro Se. Francis M. Curnutte, III, Farmer, Cline & Campbell, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Respondent.
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Jamal A. Azeez petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find there has been no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.