Case Name: White et al. v. Atlantic Refining Company, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1935-05-27
Citations: 318 Pa. 569
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 72
Parties: White et al. v. Atlantic Refining Company, Appellant.
Judges: Before Simpson, Kephart, Schaefer, Maxey, Drew and Linn, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 318
Pages: 569–569

Head Matter:
White et al. v. Atlantic Refining Company, Appellant.
Argued January 21, 1935;
reargued May 13, 1935.
Before Simpson, Kephart, Schaefer, Maxey, Drew and Linn, JJ.
Theodore Lane Bean, for appellant.
Samuel D. Conner, for appellees.
May 27, 1935:

Opinion:
Per Curiam,
We are satisfied upon an inspection of the premises that since Judge Knight made his decree December 8, 1933, there is merit in the contention that there has been an encroachment of business within the 600-foot radius found to be exclusively residential. We accordingly direct the record to be returned to the court below and the proceedings remanded for a rehearing in the light of the changes of conditions which have taken place since the hearing of the cause before the chancellor.