Case Name: The People of the State of New York ex rel. Patrick F. White, Appellant, v. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Albany, as The Board of County Canvassers, et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1908-04-21
Citations: 192 N.Y. 539
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York ex rel. Patrick F. White, Appellant, v. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Albany, as The Board of County Canvassers, et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 192
Pages: 539–540

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Patrick F. White, Appellant, v. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Albany, as The Board of County Canvassers, et al., Respondents.
People ex rel. White v. Bd. of Supervisors, 125 App. Div. 914. affirmed.
(Argued April 1, 1908;
decided April 21, 1908.)
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial depart ment, entered March 24, 1908, which affirmed an interlocutory judgment of Special Term sustaining a demurrer to an alternative writ of mandamus. -
The following questions were certified:
“1. Does the alternative writ of mandamus state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action or grievance to . redress which a writ of mandamus could be issued, so far as the ballots mentioned in said writ and contained in the ballot boxes containing the ballots of the various election districts of the eighth ward of the city of Albany and deposited with the city clerk of the city of Albany, are concerned ?
“ 2. Has the Supreme Court jurisdiction under section 114 of the Election Law or under its general power, authority and jurisdiction to determine in this proceeding as to the validity of the ballots mentioned in said writ, contained in the boxes deposited with the said city clerk, and to order a recount and recanvass of such ballots such as provided by said section 114?
“ 3. Is there a defect of parties defendant ? ”
Charles B. Templeton for appellant.
Daniel J. Dugan for respondents.

Opinion:
Order affirmed, with costs. First and second questions certified answered in the negative ; third question not answered; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.