Case Name: Luegenaer THOMAS, Appellant, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2007-03-21
Citations: 950 So. 2d 543
Docket Number: No. 4D07-123
Parties: Luegenaer THOMAS, Appellant, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, Appellee.
Judges: STONE, WARNER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 950
Pages: 543–543

Head Matter:
Luegenaer THOMAS, Appellant, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, Appellee.
No. 4D07-123.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
March 21, 2007.
Luegenaer Thomas, Fort Lauderdale, pro se.
Bradley R. Bischoff, Tallahassee, for ap-pellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this appeal from an order denying appellant's petition for writ of mandamus/habeas corpus, appellee Florida Parole Commission concedes that the trial court erred in ruling on the petition before waiting twenty days to permit appellant to file a reply to appellee's response. See Bard v. Wolson, 687 So.2d 254 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). We agree and reverse for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
STONE, WARNER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.