Case Name: Robert Neil JOANNIDES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Russell GINN; Larry Dail; Robert Tyson, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-03-12
Citations: 31 F. App'x 107
Docket Number: No. 01-7423
Parties: Robert Neil JOANNIDES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Russell GINN; Larry Dail; Robert Tyson, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 31
Pages: 107–107

Head Matter:
Robert Neil JOANNIDES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Russell GINN; Larry Dail; Robert Tyson, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 01-7423.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 26, 2002.
Decided March 12, 2002.
Robert Neil Joannides, Appellant Pro Se. Burén Riley Shields, III, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Robert Neil Joannides appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Further, Joannides' claims regarding his untimely submission of affidavits, and allegations of bias on the part of the magistrate judge are meritless. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Joannides v. Ginn, No. CA-00-58-5-BR (E.D.N.C. July 18, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.