Case Name: Kashyism MANSON, Petitioner v. Judge Susan I. SCHULMAN, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2016-03-07
Citations: 635 Pa. 192
Docket Number: No. 6 EM 2016
Parties: Kashyism MANSON, Petitioner v. Judge Susan I. SCHULMAN, Respondent.
Judges: Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 635
Pages: 192–192

Head Matter:
133 A.3d 290
Kashyism MANSON, Petitioner v. Judge Susan I. SCHULMAN, Respondent.
No. 6 EM 2016.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
March 7, 2016.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 7th day of March, 2016, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Ali, 608 Pa. 71, 10 A.3d 282, 293 (2010) (explaining that a pro se filing presented by an appellant represented by counsel is a "legal nullity").
The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record and to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.
Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.