Case Name: David A. STEBBINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EDUCAP, INC., Defendant-Appellee, and Morgan Doughty; Nicholas Hood; Richard Hood; Hood & Stacy, P.A., Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-04-28
Citations: 600 F. App'x 163
Docket Number: No. 15-1074
Parties: David A. STEBBINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EDUCAP, INC., Defendant-Appellee, and Morgan Doughty; Nicholas Hood; Richard Hood; Hood & Stacy, P.A., Defendants.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 600
Pages: 163–163

Head Matter:
David A. STEBBINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EDUCAP, INC., Defendant-Appellee, and Morgan Doughty; Nicholas Hood; Richard Hood; Hood & Stacy, P.A., Defendants.
No. 15-1074.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 23, 2015.
Decided: April 28, 2015.
David A. Stebbins, Appellant Pro Se. Diana Margeaux Thomas, Williams Mullen, McLean, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
David A. Stebbins appeals the district court's order granting EduCap, Inc.'s summary judgment motion on his claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12203 (2012), and for malicious prosecution under Arkansas law. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. Stebbins v. EduCap, Inc., No. 1:14-cv-00961-CMH-TCB, 2014 WL 7845769 (E.D.Va. Dec. 23, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the' decisional process.
AFFIRMED.