Case Name: Kipton PRELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-11-14
Citations: 205 S.W.3d 325
Docket Number: No. WD 65479
Parties: Kipton PRELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before HOWARD, C.J., and BRECKENRIDGE, and HARDWICK, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 205
Pages: 325–326

Head Matter:
Kipton PRELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 65479.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Nov. 14, 2006.
Ruth B. Sanders, Appellate District Defender, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Robert J. (Jeff) Bartholomew, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before HOWARD, C.J., and BRECKENRIDGE, and HARDWICK, JJ.

Opinion:
Order
PER CURIAM.
Appellant seeks post-conviction relief for ineffective assistance of counsel under Rule 29.15. Appellant claims his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to move to strike the charges of furnishing pornography to a minor and supplying liquor to a minor when he had already been charged with endangering the welfare of a child. He also claims that trial counsel was ineffective in that counsel failed to relay the prosecution's offer for a plea bargain, which he would have accepted.
Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).