Case Name: Annette G. SHUCK, Appellant, v. CICI ENTERPRISES, L.P., et al., Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2008-08-12
Citations: 260 S.W.3d 426
Docket Number: No. ED 90444
Parties: Annette G. SHUCK, Appellant, v. CICI ENTERPRISES, L.P., et al., Respondents.
Judges: Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 260
Pages: 426–426

Head Matter:
Annette G. SHUCK, Appellant, v. CICI ENTERPRISES, L.P., et al., Respondents.
No. ED 90444.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Aug. 12, 2008.
Richard G. Hauser, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
John A. Michener, St. Louis, MO, Bradley S. Russell, Overland Park, KS, for respondents.
Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Annette Shuck appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing her three-count petition. A written opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision. We affirm the trial court's judgment. Rule 84.16(b)(5).