Case Name: Esther Ruth Goldstein, Appellant, v. Lues Kranz and Another, Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1935-05
Citations: 244 A.D. 861
Docket Number: 
Parties: Esther Ruth Goldstein, Appellant, v. Lues Kranz and Another, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 244
Pages: 861–861

Head Matter:
Esther Ruth Goldstein, Appellant, v. Lues Kranz and Another, Respondents.

Opinion:
The plaintiff's action is for injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the construction of a dam. The defendants ask for the reformation of the instrument granting plaintiff's rights on the ground of scrivener's mistake and misrepresentation. Plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and reformation ordered. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., McNamee, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.