Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Larry PAGETT, a/k/a Lorenzo Blaisle, a/k/a Leslie Pagett, a/k/a Biz, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-11-12
Citations: 400 F. App'x 585
Docket Number: No. 09-0184-cr
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Larry PAGETT, a/k/a Lorenzo Blaisle, a/k/a Leslie Pagett, a/k/a Biz, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: PRESENT: B.D. PARKER, RICHARD C. WESLEY, Circuit Judges, BARBARA S. JONES, District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 400
Pages: 585–586

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Larry PAGETT, a/k/a Lorenzo Blaisle, a/k/a Leslie Pagett, a/k/a Biz, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-0184-cr.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Nov. 12, 2010.
Gary S. Villanueva, Law Offices of Gary Villanueva, New York, NY, for Appellant.
Morris J. Fodeman, Assistant United States Attorney (David C. James & Soum-ya Dayananda, Assistant United States Attorneys, of Counsel, on the brief), for Loretta E. Lynch, United States Attorney, Eastern District of New York, Brooklyn, NY, for Appellee.
PRESENT: B.D. PARKER, RICHARD C. WESLEY, Circuit Judges, BARBARA S. JONES, District Judge.
The Honorable Barbara S. Jones, of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
SUMMARY ORDER
Appellant appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Korman, J.), which sentenced him to 110 months of imprisonment, three years of supervised release, and a special assessment of $100. This sentence was imposed on Appellant, a previously convicted felon, after he plead guilty to knowingly and intentionally possessing a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), 924(a)(2). Appellant seeks to have this sentence vacated and to have the case remanded for resentencing. We assume the parties' familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history, and the issues presented for review.
The sentence imposed by the District Court was neither procedurally nor substantively erroneous. We have considered Appellant's arguments and find them to be wholly without merit.
For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the District Court is hereby AFFIRMED.