Case Name: Orlando MORA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1984-08-28
Citations: 454 So. 2d 92
Docket Number: No. 82-2457
Parties: Orlando MORA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARK-DULL and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 454
Pages: 92–92

Head Matter:
Orlando MORA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 82-2457.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Aug. 28, 1984.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Marti Rothenberg, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Randi B. Klayman, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARK-DULL and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We reject the defendant's contention that his claim of self-defense was established as a matter of law. E.g., Darty v. State, 161 So.2d 864 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964), cert. denied, 168 So.2d 147 (Fla.1964). Accordingly, the convictions for second degree-murder and attempted second degree-murder under review are affirmed. The sentences are modified, however, to the extent only of providing that the three-year minimum mandatory provisions imposed pursuant to Sec. 775.087(2), Fla.Stat. (1981) shall be served concurrently rather than consecutively. Palmer v. State, 438 So.2d 1 (Fla.1983); Parson v. State, 450 So.2d 924 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Whitehead v. State, 446 So.2d 194 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).
Affirmed as modified.