Case Name: STATE of Rhode Island ex rel. Floyd Edmund WEBB, III v. Vincent A. CIANCI, Jr. In re VILENO et al. Board of Elections
Court: Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Jurisdiction: Rhode Island
Decision Date: 1990-12-20
Citations: 583 A.2d 880
Docket Number: Nos. 90-555-M.P., 90-560-M.P.
Parties: STATE of Rhode Island ex rel. Floyd Edmund WEBB, III v. Vincent A. CIANCI, Jr. In re VILENO et al. Board of Elections.
Judges: Before FAY, C.J., and KELLEHER, WEISBERGER, MURRAY and SHEA, JJ.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 583
Pages: 880–880

Head Matter:
STATE of Rhode Island ex rel. Floyd Edmund WEBB, III v. Vincent A. CIANCI, Jr. In re VILENO et al. Board of Elections.
Nos. 90-555-M.P., 90-560-M.P.
Supreme Court of Rhode Island.
Dec. 20, 1990.
Anthony J. Bucci, North Providence, for State Bd. of Elections, Frederick G. Cass, Providence, for Joseph Vileno, Jr.
Steven E. Snow, Providence, for Floyd Edmund Webb.
Deming E. Sherman, Providence, for Frederick Lippitt.
Patrick T. Conley, Ronald W. DelSesto, William A. Dimitri, Jr., William J. McGair, Providence, for respondent.
Amy R. Tabor, Pawtucket, for ACLU amicus curiae.
Before FAY, C.J., and KELLEHER, WEISBERGER, MURRAY and SHEA, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
This order is issued prior to the publication of a full opinion in response to the urgent need of the Government of the City of Providence for our decision in these matters.
After examination of the briefs submitted by the parties and after hearing their counsel in oral argument a majority of the court is of the opinion that:
I. An Information in the Nature of a Quo Warranto must be brought by the Attorney General and not by a private party.
II. The Board of Elections, in rejecting the challenge embodied in the petition for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, was correct because that petition was not timely filed.
III. If the Attorney General had filed the Information in the Nature of a Quo Warranto, and the merits of that petition had been reached, the court is of the opinion that Article III, § 2 of the Rhode Island Constitution is prospective in its application and would not have applied to the Mayor-elect.
Consequently, the petitions for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari and for an Information in the Nature of a Quo War-ranto are denied.
A full opinion addressing all issues in detail will be issued. The Chief Justice will, at that time, file a dissenting opinion.