Case Name: LAWSON & McMURRAY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. KATE A. MIAL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1914-03-16
Citations: 86 N.J.L. 358
Docket Number: 
Parties: LAWSON & McMURRAY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. KATE A. MIAL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 86
Pages: 358–358

Head Matter:
LAWSON & McMURRAY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. KATE A. MIAL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Submitted December 15, 1913
Decided March 16, 1914.
On appeal from the Hudson County Circuit Court.
For the plaintiff-respondent, Rudolph Schroeder and John D. Pierson.
For the defendant-appellant, Samuel A. Besson.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirme'd, for the reasons firstly and secondly expressed in the opinion delivered by the Chancellor in the ease of Davis v. Mial, at the present term of this court, ante p. 167.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Trencharb, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Bogert, Vrebenburgl-i, Congbon, White, Heppenheimer, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.