Case Name: MIDDLESEX COUNTY SEWERAGE AUTHORITY, A BODY CORPORATE AND POLITIC OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. BOROUGH OF MIDDLESEX, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1963-04-16
Citations: 79 N.J. Super. 24
Docket Number: 
Parties: MIDDLESEX COUNTY SEWERAGE AUTHORITY, A BODY CORPORATE AND POLITIC OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. BOROUGH OF MIDDLESEX, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 79
Pages: 24–25

Head Matter:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY SEWERAGE AUTHORITY, A BODY CORPORATE AND POLITIC OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. BOROUGH OF MIDDLESEX, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued April 8, 1963
Decided April 16, 1963.
Before Judges Goldmann, Erbunb and Eoley.
Mr. Karl R. Meyertons argued the cause for appellants {Messrs. Rafferty & Blacker, attorneys for appellant Borough of Middlesex; Mr. Louis J. Milano, attorney for appellant Borough of South River; Mr. Elia Barbati, Jr., attorney for appellants Borough of Bound Brook and Borough of South
Bound Brook; Mr. John J. Rafferty, of counsel for all appellants).
Mr. Edward J. Johnson, Jr., argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Johnson & Johnson, attorneys; Mr. Edward J. Johnson, of counsel).

Opinion:
Pee Cijeiam.
The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons stated by Judge Cohen in his opinion reported at 74 N. J. Super. 591 (Law Div. 1962).