Case Name: Jenny MARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ELI LILLY & CO., Lilly USA, LLC, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-07-21
Citations: 693 F. App'x 866
Docket Number: No. 16-13043
Parties: Jenny MARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ELI LILLY & CO., Lilly USA, LLC, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JORDAN, and BALDOCK, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 693
Pages: 866–866

Head Matter:
Jenny MARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ELI LILLY & CO., Lilly USA, LLC, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-13043
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
(July 21, 2017)
Cheryl Barnes Legare, Legare Attwood & Wolfe, LLC, Atlanta, GA, Edward Daniel Buckley, Buckley Beal, LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellant
Ellen Elizabeth Boshkoff, Rozlyn Fulgo-ni-Britton, Amanda L. Shelby,. Faegre Baker Daniels, LLP, Indianapolis, IN, Stephen M. Brooks, Lucas Allen Westby, Nelson Mullins- Riley & Scarborough, LLP, Atlanta, GA, D. Lucetta Pope, Faegre Baker Daniels LLP, South Bend, IN, for Defendants-Appellees
Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JORDAN, and BALDOCK, Circuit Judges.
The Honorable Bobby R. Baldock, United States Circuit Judge for the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff Jenny Martin obtained a jury verdict in her favor on a claim that her former employer, Defendant Eli Lilly & Company ("Lilly"), discriminated against her on the basis of her disability in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), 42 U.S.C. § 12112. In a separate appeal, Lilly challenged the district court's denial of its motion for judgment as a matter of law. We reversed and directed the district court to enter judgment in Lilly's favor. See Martin v. Eli Lilly & Co., No. 16-11537, — Fed.Appx, -, 2017 WL 3098122 (11th Cir. 2017). In this appeal, Martin argues the district court incorrectly calculated the attorney's fees it awarded her as the prevailing party. Because Martin is no longer the prevailing party, her appeal is moot. We DISMISS the appeal.