Case Name: Donald T. MURRAY; Brian J. Hissam, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SKY BANK, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-04-18
Citations: 126 F. App'x 118
Docket Number: No. 04-1880
Parties: Donald T. MURRAY; Brian J. Hissam, Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. SKY BANK, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 126
Pages: 118–119

Head Matter:
Donald T. MURRAY; Brian J. Hissam, Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. SKY BANK, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 04-1880.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 25, 2005.
Decided April 18, 2005.
Joseph L. Ludovici, Aronson, Fineman & Davis Co., LPA, East Liverpool, Ohio, for Appellants. Paul J. Walsh, III, Adam M. Barnes, Walsh, Collis & Blackmer, LLC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for Appellee.
Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellants appeal the district court's order enforcing a settlement agreement. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and do not find that the district court abused its discretion by enforcing the agreement. See Young v. FDIC, 103 F.3d 1180, 1194 (4th Cir.1997) (stating review standard); DeVane v. Kennedy, 205 W.Va. 519, 519 S.E.2d 622, 630 (1999) (stating review standard under West Virginia law). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Murray v. Sky Bank, No. CA-03-242-5 (N.D.W.Va. June 14, 2004). We grant the motion to submit the case on briefs because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED