Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Dwayne ALLISON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-08-10
Citations: 390 F. App'x 277
Docket Number: No. 09-6974
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Richard Dwayne ALLISON, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 390
Pages: 277–277

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Richard Dwayne ALLISON, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 09-6974.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 27, 2010.
Decided: Aug. 10, 2010.
Richard Dwayne Allison, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer R. Bockhorst, Assistant United States Attorney, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Richard Dwayne Allison appeals the district court's order denying his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006), which sought a reduction in sentence based upon the amendments to the crack cocaine sentencing guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Allison, No. 1:04-cr-00093-gmw-pms-1 (W.D.Va. Apr. 7, 2009). We deny the Government's motion to dismiss the appeal and dispense with oral argument because the facts and' legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.