Case Name: Elsher v. Hughes
Court: New Hampshire Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Hampshire
Decision Date: 1881-06
Citations: 60 N.H. 469
Docket Number: 
Parties: Elsher v. Hughes.
Judges: Blodgett, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
Reporter: New Hampshire Reports
Volume: 60
Pages: 469–469

Head Matter:
Elsher v. Hughes.
The form of action may be changed by amendment, and the amendment may be made after a verdict for the plaintiff, without a new trial, when the verdict could not have been affected by the amendment if it had been made before the trial.
Trespass, qu. el. Verdict for the plaintiff.
Dodge and Copeland, for the defendant.
T. J. Smith and Worcester, for the plaintiff.

Opinion:
Doe, C. J.
The plaintiff is entitled to damages for the defendant's use and occupation of the plaintiff's store. The measure of -damages given to the jury was the same as would have been given in assumpsit. Whether, upon the evidence in the case, the value of the occupation should be recovered in trespass or assumpsit, is .an unnecessary question. Merrill v. Perkins, 59 N. H. 343. When the plaintiff amends the declaration by adding a common count in assumpsit, there will be
Judgment on the verdict.
Blodgett, J., did not sit: the others concurred.