Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Naketia WILSON, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-06-19
Citations: 53 S.W.3d 178
Docket Number: No. ED 77855
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Naketia WILSON, Appellant.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, P.J., MARY RHODES RUSSELL and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 53
Pages: 178–178

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Naketia WILSON, Appellant.
No. ED 77855.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
June 19, 2001.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 26, 2001.
Application for Transfer Denied Sept. 25, 2001.
Dave Hemingway, Asst. Sp. Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Stephanie Morrell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, P.J., MARY RHODES RUSSELL and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Naketia Wilson appeals from a judgment denying, after an evidentiary hearing, his pre-sentencing Rule 29.07(d) motion to withdraw his pleas of guilty.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. The motion court's judgment is based on findings and conclusions that are not an abuse of discretion or in error. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties, however, have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).