Case Name: LAUGHLIN v. LOFTIN et al.
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1952-12-22
Citations: 62 So. 2d 745
Docket Number: 
Parties: LAUGHLIN v. LOFTIN et al.
Judges: SEBRING, C. J., and TERRELL, THOMAS, HOBSON, ROBERTS, MATHEWS and DREW, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 62
Pages: 745–747

Head Matter:
LAUGHLIN v. LOFTIN et al.
Supreme Court of Florida, en Banc.
Dec. 22, 1952.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 9, 1963.
Nichols, Gaither & Green', and William Clinton Green, Miami, for appellant.
Loftin, Anderson, Scott, McCarthy & Preston, Miami, Russell L. Frink, Jacksonville, Robert H. Anderson and Francis W. Sams, Miami, for appellees. .

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The record and the briefs in this cause have been examined and Mr. Justice THOMAS, Mr. Justice HOBSON, Mr. Justice ROBERTS, Mr. Justice MATHEWS and Mr. Justice DREW are of the view that the judgment should be affirmed. The facts of the case are detailed in the dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice TERRELL, who with Mr. Chief Justice SEBRING are of the view that the judgment should be reversed. It follows that the judgment appealed from must be and is hereby affirmed.
SEBRING, C. J., and TERRELL, THOMAS, HOBSON, ROBERTS, MATHEWS and DREW, JJ., concur.