Case Name: Daniel Pullo et al., Respondents, v. James Artrip et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2005-02-22
Citations: 15 A.D.3d 559
Docket Number: 
Parties: Daniel Pullo et al., Respondents, v James Artrip et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 15
Pages: 559–560

Head Matter:
Daniel Pullo et al., Respondents, v James Artrip et al., Appellants.
[789 NYS2d 690]

Opinion:
In an action to compel the determination of claims to real property pursuant to RPAPL article 15, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Carey, J.), dated March 3, 2003, as, after a nonjury trial, dismissed their counterclaim seeking title to certain real property by adverse possession.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The defendants' evidence at trial failed to establish that they obtained title by adverse possession to any of the real property at issue (see RPAPL 522; Ray v Beacon Hudson Mtn. Corp., 88 NY2d 154 [1996]; Seisser v Eglin, 7 AD3d 505 [2004]; Rowland v Crystal Bay Constr., 301 AD2d 585 [2003]; Giannone v Trotwood Corp., 266 AD2d 430 [1999]). Thus, their counterclaim was properly dismissed. H. Miller, J.P., Cozier, Ritter and Spolzino, JJ., concur.