Case Name: Edward James EGAN, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gerald R. HOLT, Sheriff; Doctor John Pritty; Doctor Edwin Palvernio, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-11-30
Citations: 207 F. App'x 314
Docket Number: No. 06-7065
Parties: Edward James EGAN, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gerald R. HOLT, Sheriff; Doctor John Pritty; Doctor Edwin Palvernio, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 207
Pages: 314–314

Head Matter:
Edward James EGAN, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gerald R. HOLT, Sheriff; Doctor John Pritty; Doctor Edwin Palvernio, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 06-7065.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 21, 2006.
Decided: Nov. 30, 2006.
Edward James Egan, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Jim Harold Guynn, Jr., Guynn, Memmer & Dillon, P.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Edward James Egan, Sr., appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Egan's motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Egan v. Holt, No. 7:05-cv-00280, 2006 WL 1519943 (W.D.Va. May 25, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.