Case Name: CLEMENT, Excise Com'r, Respondent, v. FEDERAL UNION SURETY CO. et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1907-01-18
Citations: 102 N.Y.S. 1132
Docket Number: 
Parties: CLEMENT, Excise Com’r, Respondent, v. FEDERAL UNION SURETY CO. et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 102
Pages: 1132–1132

Head Matter:
CLEMENT, Excise Com’r, Respondent, v. FEDERAL UNION SURETY CO. et al., Appellants.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.
January 18, 1907.)
Ac-, tion by Maynard M. Clement, as state commissioner of excise of the state of New York, against the Federal Union Surety Company, impleaded with Thomas Lunan.

Opinion:
No opinion. Motion for leave to go to Court of Appeals granted, and question certified as follows: Does the limitation m section 18 of the Liquor Tax Law, Laws 1896, p. 61, c. 112, as to the amount of the recovery, prevent a plaintiff from taxing costs and disbursements, and add-mg same to the verdict when the verdict is for the full penalty of the bond?