Case Name: The Durable Floor and Tile Co. Judson Sheldon International Co. v. United States
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1963-11-06
Citations: 51 Cust. Ct. 448
Docket Number: Reap. Dec. 10618; Entry Nos. 5842-H; 12192-H
Parties: The Durable Floor and Tile Co. Judson Sheldon International Co. v. United States
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Volume: 51
Pages: 448–449

Head Matter:
(Reap. Dec. 10618)
The Durable Floor and Tile Co. Judson Sheldon International Co. v. United States
Entry Nos. 5842-H; 12192-H.
(Decided November 6, 1963)
Sharp & Bogan for the plaintiffs.
John W. Douglas, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Opinion:
Rao, Judge:
The appeals for reappraisement listed above were submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:
IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the Plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General, Counsel for the United States:
1. That the merchandise covered by the present appeals for reappraisement consists of hardboard manufactured in France and exported to the United States by the Soeiete Francaise pour le Commerce Exterieur de Panneaux (EXPANO) and is described on the invoices as Isogil hardboard D-3 or D-6 and Isorel hardboard D-3 or D-5 ;
2. That at the times of exportation of such merchandise, its export value within the meaning of Section 402a(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, was less than its foreign value within the meaning of Section 402a(c) of that Act;
3. That foreign value as defined in Section 402a(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis for determining the value for appraisement of this merchandise, and that such value is:
A. In the case of Isogil D-3, 3.31 nouveau francs per square meter, less 31%, less 1%, less 1%%, less 20%, plus packing;
B. In the case of Isogil D-6, 5.06 nouveau francs per square meter, less 22%, less 1%, less 1%%, less 20%, plus packing;
C. In the case of Isorel D-3, 3.31 nouveau francs per square meter, less 33%%, less 1%, less 1%%, less 20%, plus packing;
D. In the ease of Isorel D-5, 4.32 nouveau francs per square meter, less 22%, less 1%, less 1%%, less 20%, plus packing;
Upon the agreed facts, I find foreign value, as defined in section 402a (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise covered by said appeals and that such values were as follows:
A. In the case of Isogil D-3, 3.31 nouveau francs per square meter, less 31%, less 1%, less 1%%, less 20%, plus packing;
B. In the ease of Isogil D-6, 5.06 nouveau francs per square meter, less 22%, less 1%, less 1%%, less 20%, plus packing;
C. In the case of Isorel D-3, 3.31 nouveau francs per square meter, less 33%%, less 1%, less 1%%, less 20%, plus packing;
D. In the case of Isorel D-5, 4.32 nouveau francs per square meter, less 22%, less 1%, less 1%%, less 20%, plus packing.
As to all other merchandise not heretofore enumerated, the appeals for reappraisement are dismissed.
Judgment will be entered accordingly.