Case Name: Cedric L. RHONE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2008-09-30
Citations: 265 S.W.3d 358
Docket Number: No. ED 90536
Parties: Cedric L. RHONE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 265
Pages: 358–358

Head Matter:
Cedric L. RHONE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 90536.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Sept. 30, 2008.
Maleaner Ryna Harvery, Saint Louis, MO, for movant/appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent/respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Cedric L. Rhone (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 29.15 without an evidentiary hearing. Movant contends that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because his counsel was ineffective for failing to file a pre-trial motion to suppress the identifications by the eyewitnesses.
The motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value and we affirm by written order. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2005, unless otherwise indicated.