Case Name: NEWMAN DEVELOPMENT GROUP OF POTTSTOWN, LLC., Respondent v. GENUARDI'S FAMILY MARKETS, INC. and Safeway Inc., Petitioners
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2011-11-01
Citations: 612 Pa. 320
Docket Number: No. 458 MAL 2011
Parties: NEWMAN DEVELOPMENT GROUP OF POTTSTOWN, LLC., Respondent v. GENUARDI'S FAMILY MARKETS, INC. and Safeway Inc., Petitioners.
Judges: 
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 612
Pages: 320–320

Head Matter:
30 A.3d 1104
NEWMAN DEVELOPMENT GROUP OF POTTSTOWN, LLC., Respondent v. GENUARDI'S FAMILY MARKETS, INC. and Safeway Inc., Petitioners.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Nov. 1, 2011.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 1st day of November, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the following issue, as very slightly edited from Petitioner's phrasing:
Did the Superior Court err in quashing Genuardi's appeal for failure to file a post-trial motion, where the appeal was from the trial court's recalculation of damages in accordance with the Superior Court remand order and where no additional evidence was received?