Case Name: Gary Buterra WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. CIRCUIT COURT FOR CITY OF SUFFOLK, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-09-26
Citations: 583 F. App'x 247
Docket Number: No. 14-7064
Parties: Gary Buterra WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. CIRCUIT COURT FOR CITY OF SUFFOLK, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 583
Pages: 247–248

Head Matter:
Gary Buterra WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. CIRCUIT COURT FOR CITY OF SUFFOLK, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 14-7064.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 23, 2014.
Decided: Sept. 26, 2014.
Gary Buterra Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished.opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Gary Buterra Williams appeals the district court's order denying his motion to amend his motion to reconsider, styled as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion, the court's order remanding his state prosecution to state court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.