Case Name: WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC & MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. BROOKLYN RAPID TRANSIT COMPANY et al., Defendant. In the Matter of the Use and Occupation of Property of the Brooklyn City Railroad Company, Respondent, by Lindley M. GARRISON, as Receiver of the Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1927-06-06
Citations: 20 F.2d 934
Docket Number: No. 86
Parties: WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC & MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. BROOKLYN RAPID TRANSIT COMPANY et al., Defendant. In the Matter of the Use and Occupation of Property of the Brooklyn City Railroad Company, Respondent, by Lindley M. GARRISON, as Receiver of the Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company, Appellant.
Judges: Before MANTON, L. HAND, and SWAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 20
Pages: 934–934

Head Matter:
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC & MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. BROOKLYN RAPID TRANSIT COMPANY et al., Defendant. In the Matter of the Use and Occupation of Property of the Brooklyn City Railroad Company, Respondent, by Lindley M. GARRISON, as Receiver of the Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company, Appellant.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
June 6, 1927.
No. 86.
See, also, 288 F. 221; 291 F. 836, 863.
George N. Hamlin and Harold G. Pickering, both of New York City, for appellant.
Cullen & Dykman, of Brooklyn, N. Y. (William N. Dykman and Sigourney B. 01-ney, both of Brooklyn, N. Y., of counsel), for respondent.
Before MANTON, L. HAND, and SWAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PEE CUEIAM.
The order entered is affirmed. By this affirmance we express no opinion as to the matters discussed in the opinion below concerning the issues involved in the ancillary suit there referred to.
Order (20 F.[2d] 932) affirmed, with costs.