Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jack Stokes, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1997-05-30
Citations: 239 A.D.2d 955
Docket Number: Appeal No. 1
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jack Stokes, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 239
Pages: 955–955

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jack Stokes, Appellant.
(Appeal No. 1.)
[661 NYS2d 573]

Opinion:
Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted. Memorandum: On November 19, 1993, we affirmed defendant's judgments of conviction (People v Stokes, 198 AD2d 849, lv denied 83 NY2d 810; People v Stokes, 198 AD2d 847, lv denied 83 NY2d 810). Defendant subsequently moved for a writ of error coram nobis on the ground that he was denied effective assistance of appellate counsel on his appeals because counsel failed to raise an issue on direct appeal that would have resulted in reversal. We concluded that the issue may have merit and granted the motion, vacating the prior orders that affirmed the judgments of conviction and directing that the appeals be heard de novo (People v Stokes, 234 AD2d 1013). The People do not dispute the contention that defendant was not present for the Sandoval conferences. Because his presence at the Sandoval conferences would not have been superfluous, defendant's judgments of conviction must be reversed (see, People v Favor, 82 NY2d 254, rearg denied 83 NY2d 801; People v Dokes, 79 NY2d 656; People v Walker, 210 AD2d 1002).
We have reviewed defendant's remaining contentions, which were raised in the prior appeals, and conclude that they are without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Cunningham, J.—Conspiracy, 2nd Degree.) Present— Denman, P. J., Green, Doerr, Balio and Fallon, JJ.