Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rodney Edward WALL, a/k/a Sid Dft 3:99-24-9, a/k/a Big Rodney, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-02-24
Citations: 366 F. App'x 470
Docket Number: No. 09-7681
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rodney Edward WALL, a/k/a Sid Dft 3:99-24-9, a/k/a Big Rodney, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 366
Pages: 470–470

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rodney Edward WALL, a/k/a Sid Dft 3:99-24-9, a/k/a Big Rodney, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-7681.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 18, 2009.
Decided: Feb. 24, 2010.
Rodney Edward Wall, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Rodney Edward Wall appeals the district court's order denying Wall's 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Wall, No. 3:99-cr-00024-FDW-9 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 31, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.