Case Name: Eric A. Klein, Appellant, v. Arbor National Mortgage, Inc., Defendant, and Brevard Owners, Inc., Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1998-03-17
Citations: 248 A.D.2d 240
Docket Number: 
Parties: Eric A. Klein, Appellant, v Arbor National Mortgage, Inc., Defendant, and Brevard Owners, Inc., Respondent.
Judges: Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger and Andrias, JJ.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 248
Pages: 240–241

Head Matter:
Eric A. Klein, Appellant, v Arbor National Mortgage, Inc., Defendant, and Brevard Owners, Inc., Respondent.
[671 NYS2d 213]

Opinion:
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered January 9, 1997, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by plaintiffs brief, dismissed the complaint as against defendant-respondent, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Plaintiffs cause of action for fraud against defendant-respondent Brevard was time barred, having been brought more than six years from the date the fraud was allegedly committed, and more than two years from the date of discovery by plaintiff of the alleged fraud (see, e.g., Rostuca Holdings v Polo, 231 AD2d 402, 403). Also properly dismissed was plaintiffs cause of action against Brevard for conversion since Brevard never purported to take title to plaintiffs cooperative shares and lease (see, Allen v Murray House Owners Corp., 174 AD2d 400, Iv denied 78 NY2d 860), but merely transferred the subject shares and proprietary lease to a subsequent purchaser pursuant to UCC 9-504 (4). Nor, contrary to plaintiffs argument, is defendant Brevard's retention as a party in this action necessary to afford plaintiff relief in the event that plaintiff prevails upon his claims against defendant Arbor National Mortgage, Inc., the holder of the mortgage upon plaintiffs former apartment and purchaser of the apartment in foreclosure. Defendant Brevard has conceded, that if the foreclosure and subsequent purchase by defendant Arbor are ultimately found to have been improper, it will be required to reissue the stock certificate and proprietary lease in plaintiffs name.
Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger and Andrias, JJ.