Case Name: Luther Jeeter Teague v. State
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1954-06-26
Citations: 160 Tex. Crim. 532
Docket Number: No. 27,064
Parties: Luther Jeeter Teague v. State
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Criminal Reports
Volume: 160
Pages: 532–535

Head Matter:
Luther Jeeter Teague v. State
No. 27,064.
June 26, 1954
On the Merits October 13, 1954
Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing1 Denied (Without Written Opinion) November 24, 1954
Jouette M. Bonner, Jacksboro, for-appellant.
Wesley Dice, State’s Attorney, Austin, for the state.

Opinion:
WOODLEY, Judge.
The conviction is for driving an automobile upon a public highway while intoxicated.
The record recites that appellant gave notice of appeal and entered into a recognizance with two named sureties, which was entered of record, but the recognizance or bond on appeal is not found in the transcript.
The clerk, in preparing a transcript, is required to include all the proceedings had in the case.
If the recognizance contained no more than shown in this transcript it was not in compliance with Art. 831, V.A.C.C.P., and did not confer jurisdiction on this court.
If appellant in fact entered into a recognizance in the terms of said Art. 831, V.A.C.C.P., or enters into a proper appeal bond, such may be shown by supplemental transcript and he may, within fifteen days, file a motion to reinstate the appeal.
The appeal is dismissed.