Case Name: CHESTERFIELD MANAGEMENT ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. HOMAR ENTERPRISES, INC., Defendant-Appellant, Missouri Department of Social Services, et al., Defendants-Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-09-28
Citations: 2 S.W.3d 854
Docket Number: No. ED 75109
Parties: CHESTERFIELD MANAGEMENT ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. HOMAR ENTERPRISES, INC., Defendant-Appellant, Missouri Department of Social Services, et al., Defendants-Respondents.
Judges: Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 2
Pages: 854–854

Head Matter:
CHESTERFIELD MANAGEMENT ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. HOMAR ENTERPRISES, INC., Defendant-Appellant, Missouri Department of Social Services, et al., Defendants-Respondents.
No. ED 75109.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Sept. 28, 1999.
John D. Bechtold, Jefferson City, Steven M. Hamburg, St. Louis, for appellant.
Terrence J. O’Toole, St. Louis, Daryl R. Hylton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Homar Enterprises, Inc., appeals the trial court's judgment declaring Chesterfield Management Associates, L.P., to be the sole owner of a Certifícate of Need for Chesterfield Manor nursing home. We find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carrron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value.
We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(1).