Case Name: Lackland v. Smith et al., Appellants
Court: Supreme Court of Missouri
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1882-04
Citations: 75 Mo. 307
Docket Number: 
Parties: Lackland v. Smith et al., Appellants.
Judges: All concur.
Reporter: Missouri Reports
Volume: 75
Pages: 307–307

Head Matter:
Lackland v. Smith et al., Appellants.
^Practice: remanding with specific directions. When an intermediate appellate court remands a case with specific directions, and no appeal is taken from this judgment, and the trial court conforms its action to the judgment, upon a second appeal the Supreme Court will hold the judgment conclusive. See Adair County v. Ownby, ante, p. 282.
Appeal from St. Louis Court of Appeals.
Aeeirmed.
Castleman $ Gibson for appellants.
Martin ‡ Lackland for respondent.

Opinion:
Sherwood, C. J.
We are precluded from any examination into the merits of this 'cause, for the reason that -when the cause came the first time up to the St. Louis -court of appeals, that court reversed the judgment of the -circuit court and sent the cause back with specific directions to that court, how to proceed. No appeal was taken from the judgment of the court of appeals, and consequently-the judgment stands in full force to-day. The circuit court has conformed its action in the premises to the mandate of the court of appeals, the latter court has affirmed that judgment, and it only remains to say that on the authority of Chouteau v. Allen, 74 Mo. 56, and cases cited, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.
All concur.