Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fidel BAEZA-GAMA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-08-04
Citations: 140 F. App'x 743
Docket Number: No. 03-10062; D.C. No. CR-02-00417-LRH
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fidel BAEZA-GAMA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before O’SCANNLAIN, CALLAHAN and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 140
Pages: 743–744

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fidel BAEZA-GAMA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 03-10062.
D.C. No. CR-02-00417-LRH.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 1, 2005.
Decided Aug. 4, 2005.
Robert A. Bork, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Las Vegas, NV, for PlaintiffAppellee.
Leo P. Flangas, Esq., Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before O’SCANNLAIN, CALLAHAN and BEA, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Fidel Baeza-Gama appeals his 57-month sentence following his guilty plea to Unlawful Reentry of a Deported Alien in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We cannot determine from the record whether the district court would have imposed a materially different sentence if it had known that the Sentencing Guidelines were advisory rather than mandatory. Therefore, under United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc) and United States v. Hermoso-Garcia, 413 F.3d 1085, 2005 WL 1579507 (9th Cir. July 7, 2005), we remand for the limited purpose of making that determination.
REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.