Case Name: Gilbert L. SPURLOCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mrs. LEAL; Department of United States Army, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-01-21
Citations: 308 F. App'x 666
Docket Number: No. 08-2183
Parties: Gilbert L. SPURLOCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mrs. LEAL; Department of United States Army, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 308
Pages: 666–667

Head Matter:
Gilbert L. SPURLOCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mrs. LEAL; Department of United States Army, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 08-2183.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 5, 2009.
Decided: Jan. 21, 2009.
Gilbert L. Spurlock, Appellant Pro Se. Carol A. Casto, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Gilbert L. Spurlock appeals the district court's order accepting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil complaint for failure to timely respond to the court's order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Spurlock v. Leal, No. 3:07-cv-00749 (S.D.W.Va. Sept. 16, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.