Case Name: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Ramon PINA, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1986-05-01
Citations: 487 So. 2d 1055
Docket Number: No. 67280
Parties: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Ramon PINA, Respondent.
Judges: BOYD, C.J., and ADKINS, OVERTON, McDonald, EHRLICH and BARKETT, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 487
Pages: 1055–1055

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Ramon PINA, Respondent.
No. 67280.
Supreme Court of Florida.
May 1, 1986.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Joan Fowler Rossin, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for petitioner.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender and Thomas F. Ball, III, Asst. Public Defender, Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, West Palm Beach, for respondent.

Opinion:
SHAW, Justice.
We grant the petition for review in this case under article V, section 3(b)(4) of the Florida Constitution. The district court certified the following question to be of great public importance:
Under the 1983 amendment to article I, section 12 of the Florida Constitution, does the exclusionary rule apply in probation revocation hearings?
Pina v. State, 473 So.2d 736 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).
We answered the certified question herein in the affirmative in State v. Cross, 487 So.2d 1056 (Fla.1986), and approve the decision below on the authority of Cross.
It is so ordered.
BOYD, C.J., and ADKINS, OVERTON, McDonald, EHRLICH and BARKETT, JJ., concur.