Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Oscar GOMEZ-GOMEZ, also known as Oscar Gomez, also known as Oscar Gomez Lopez, also known as Oscar Carlos Lopez, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-04-17
Citations: 469 F. App'x 408
Docket Number: No. 11-20492
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Oscar GOMEZ-GOMEZ, also known as Oscar Gomez, also known as Oscar Gomez Lopez, also known as Oscar Carlos Lopez, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 469
Pages: 408–408

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Oscar GOMEZ-GOMEZ, also known as Oscar Gomez, also known as Oscar Gomez Lopez, also known as Oscar Carlos Lopez, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-20492
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 17, 2012.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Margaret Christina Ling, H. Michael Sokolow, Assistant Federal Public Defenders, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendanb-Appel-lant.
Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Oscar Gomez-Gomez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Gomez-Gomez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cm. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.