Case Name: Gary Bonavita et al., Appellants, v. Irving McNicholas et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2010-04-20
Citations: 72 A.D.3d 859
Docket Number: 
Parties: Gary Bonavita et al., Appellants, v Irving McNicholas et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 72
Pages: 859–859

Head Matter:
Gary Bonavita et al., Appellants, v Irving McNicholas et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.
[898 NYS2d 866]

Opinion:
— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Murphy, J.), dated September 30, 2008, which granted the motion of the defendants Irving McNichoias and Professional Exterminating Co., Inc., for leave to amend their answer to include an affirmative defense that the action is barred by the Workers' Compensation Law.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the respondents' motion pursuant to CPLR 3025 (b) for leave to amend their answer to assert an affirmative defense that the action is barred by the Workers' Compensation Law, as the proposed amendment would not cause prejudice or surprise and is neither palpably insufficient nor patently devoid of merit (see CPLR 3025 [b]; Liss v Trans Auto Sys., 68 NY2d 15, 22-23 [1986]; Murray v City of New York, 43 NY2d 400, 404-407 [1977]; Lucido v Mancuso, 49 AD3d 220, 229 [2008]; Brown v Collora, 278 AD2d 266, 267 [2000]). Miller, J.P., Leventhal, Chambers and Lott, JJ., concur. [Prior Case History: 2008 NY Slip Op 32814(U).]