Case Name: Karl HARMS, Employee/Appellant, v. E & L WRIGHT BRICK & BLOCK, Employer/Respondent, and American Family Mutual Insurance Company, Insurer/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1997-12-16
Citations: 958 S.W.2d 72
Docket Number: No. 72437
Parties: Karl HARMS, Employee/Appellant, v. E & L WRIGHT BRICK & BLOCK, Employer/Respondent, and American Family Mutual Insurance Company, Insurer/Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANE, P.J., and RHODES RUSSELL and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 958
Pages: 72–72

Head Matter:
Karl HARMS, Employee/Appellant, v. E & L WRIGHT BRICK & BLOCK, Employer/Respondent, and American Family Mutual Insurance Company, Insurer/Respondent.
No. 72437.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Dec. 16, 1997.
James E. Lownsdale, St. Louis, for employee/appellant.
Todd D. Hilliker, St. Louis, for employer/respondent.
Before CRANE, P.J., and RHODES RUSSELL and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Claimant, Karl Harms, appeals from a workers' compensation award issued by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission.
The order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).