Case Name: John DOES 11-18 and Jane Doe 1, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Governor, Daniel H. Heyns, and Director of the Department of Corrections, Defendants-Appellees. John Does 1-10, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Department of Corrections, Governor, Daniel H. Heyns, and Director of the Department of Corrections, Defendants-Appellees.
Court: Michigan Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Michigan
Decision Date: 2018-05-01
Citations: 910 N.W.2d 260
Docket Number: SC: 156178, SC: 156179; COA: 332182, COA: 332183
Parties: John DOES 11-18 and Jane Doe 1, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Governor, Daniel H. Heyns, and Director of the Department of Corrections, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: North Western Reporter 2d
Volume: 910
Pages: 260–260

Head Matter:
John DOES 11-18 and Jane Doe 1, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Governor, Daniel H. Heyns, and Director of the Department of Corrections, Defendants-Appellees.
John Does 1-10, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Department of Corrections, Governor, Daniel H. Heyns, and Director of the Department of Corrections, Defendants-Appellees.
SC: 156178, SC: 156179
COA: 332182, COA: 332183
Supreme Court of Michigan.
May 1, 2018
Order

Opinion:
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 13, 2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Clement, J., did not participate due to her prior involvement as chief legal counsel for the Governor.