Case Name: Johnny Clarence SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1998-12-04
Citations: 723 So. 2d 872
Docket Number: No. 97-1800
Parties: Johnny Clarence SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: JOANOS, KAHN and DAVIS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 723
Pages: 872–873

Head Matter:
Johnny Clarence SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 97-1800.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Dec. 4, 1998.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; Fred P. Bingham II, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant's sentences are affirmed. The errors raised by Appellant in this Anders appeal involving conditions of his probation are not fundamental and, therefore, cannot be reviewed by this court because they were not preserved through contemporaneous objection or through the filing of Rule 3.800(b) motion within 30 days of the rendition of sentence. However, in Smith v. State, 687 So.2d 308 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), the direct appeal of this case, we directed the trial court upon resentencing of Appellant to correct its judgment to:
indicate that aggravated stalking is a third degree felony, rather than a second degree felony; to indicate that attempted first degree murder with a firearm is a life felony, rather than a felony punishable by life; and to indicate that attempted first degree murder is a violation of [section] 777.04, Florida Statutes. Id. at 309.
The judgment issued after resentencing contains the same errors as the original judgment. Accordingly, we remand for corree tion of the judgment in accordance with the earlier mandate of this court.
JOANOS, KAHN and DAVIS, JJ., concur.