Case Name: HABEKER et v. HABEKER
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1931-06-29
Citations: 10 Ohio Law Abs. 628
Docket Number: No. 2072
Parties: HABEKER et v HABEKER
Judges: LEVINE, J (8th Dist), sitting for KUNKLE, J, (2nd Dist).
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 10
Pages: 628–628

Head Matter:
HABEKER et v HABEKER
Ohio Appeals, 2nd Dist, Franklin Co
No. 2072.
Decided June 29, 1931
LEVINE, J (8th Dist), sitting for KUNKLE, J, (2nd Dist).
J. J. Chester, Jr, Columbus, for Habeker et.
Goldie ' Kanter and Mary MacMahon, Columbus, for Habeker.

Opinion:
BY THE COURT.
It is claimed by the plaintiff in error that this court has the same right as the court would have in a divorce case to award the custody of the child to whichever one of the parties is best adapted for the temporary keeping of the child.
In an error case some force and effect must be given to the judgment of the Court of Commoil Pleas and we do not see how under the statement of facts here we should order the custody of the child in favor of the plaintiff in error. Unless there is some move on the part of the mother to take the child out of the jurisdiction of the court we are of opinion that the custody as imposed by the judgment of the lower court must stand until the case is heard on its merits. There being no shownig of any attempt of the mother to take the child out of her custody we are clear that the plaintiff in error ¡must fail in the application for the temporary custody. The motion must therefore be overruled.
Motion overruled.
ALLREAD, PJ, LEVINE, HORNBECK, JJ, concur.