Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard SANCHEZ, also known as Richie, also known as Richard Sanchez, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-05-05
Citations: 601 F. App'x 332
Docket Number: No. 14-50840
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard SANCHEZ, also known as Richie, also known as Richard Sanchez, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING, JOLLY, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 601
Pages: 332–333

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard SANCHEZ, also known as Richie, also known as Richard Sanchez, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 14-50840
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
May 5, 2015.
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Shane John Stolarczyk, Esq., Keller Sto-larczyk P.L.L.C., Boerne, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Richard Sanchez, Three Rivers, TX, pro se.
Before KING, JOLLY, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Richard Sanchez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Sanchez has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Sanchez's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739. F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 123, 190 L.Ed.2d 94 (2014).
We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Sanchez's response. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.