Case Name: Ina SAMPSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF CAMBRIDGE, MARYLAND, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-04-16
Citations: 322 F. App'x 295
Docket Number: No. 08-1691
Parties: Ina SAMPSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. CITY OF CAMBRIDGE, MARYLAND, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 322
Pages: 295–295

Head Matter:
Ina SAMPSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. CITY OF CAMBRIDGE, MARYLAND, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 08-1691.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 31, 2009.
Decided: April 16, 2009.
R. Scott Oswald, Adam Augustine Carter, Gregory Sharma-Holt, The Employment Law Group, PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Kevin Karpinski, Victoria M. Shearer, Karpinski, Colaresi & Karp, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ina Sampson appeals the district court's order granting defendant's motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sampson v. City of Cambridge, No. l:06-cv-01819-WDQ (D. Md. June 5, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.