Case Name: Brenda HORTON, Claimant/Appellant, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the CITY OF ST. LOUIS, and The Second Injury Fund, Respondents/Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-05-16
Citations: 191 S.W.3d 687
Docket Number: No. ED 87168
Parties: Brenda HORTON, Claimant/Appellant, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the CITY OF ST. LOUIS, and The Second Injury Fund, Respondents/Respondents.
Judges: Before NANNETTE A BAKER, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 191
Pages: 687–688

Head Matter:
Brenda HORTON, Claimant/Appellant, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the CITY OF ST. LOUIS, and The Second Injury Fund, Respondents/Respondents.
No. ED 87168.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
May 16, 2006.
Kurt C. Hoener, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jennifer Rae Chestnut, Eric S. Christensen — co-counsel, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before NANNETTE A BAKER, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Brenda Horton appeals from the Final Award Allowing Compensation of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) affirming the Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge with Supplemental Opinion (Commission's Final Award). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the Commission's Final Award supported by competent and substantial evidence upon the whole record. See Hampton v. Big Boy Steel Erection, 121 S.W.3d 220, 222-23 (Mo.banc 2003). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. . We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).