Case Name: State ex rel. Varnau v. Twelfth Dist. Court of Appeals
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2015-01-28
Citations: 141 Ohio St. 3d 1448
Docket Number: 2014-1605
Parties: State ex rel. Varnau v. Twelfth Dist. Court of Appeals.
Judges: O’Connor, C.J., and Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 141
Pages: 1448–1448

Head Matter:
2014-1605.
State ex rel. Varnau v. Twelfth Dist. Court of Appeals.

Opinion:
In Mandamus and Prohibition. On motion for issuance of peremptory or alternative writ. It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that an alternative writ is granted and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.05:
The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days of the date of this entry; relator shall file a brief within 10 days of the filing of the evidence; respondents shall file a brief within 20 days after the filing of relator's brief; and relator may file a reply brief within 7 days after the filing of respondents' brief.
On motion to dismiss. Motion denied.
O'Connor, C.J., and Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O'Neill, JJ., concur.
Pfeifer, J., would issue a peremptory writ.
O'Donnell, J., would dismiss the petition.