Case Name: UNION TRUST COMPANY OF SAN DIEGO (a Corporation), Respondent, v. JOHN A. NOVOTNY et al., Appellants
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1932-08-20
Citations: 125 Cal. App. 417
Docket Number: Civ. No. 1035
Parties: UNION TRUST COMPANY OF SAN DIEGO (a Corporation), Respondent, v. JOHN A. NOVOTNY et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports
Volume: 125
Pages: 417–418

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 1035.
Fourth Appellate District.
August 20, 1932.]
UNION TRUST COMPANY OF SAN DIEGO (a Corporation), Respondent, v. JOHN A. NOVOTNY et al., Appellants.
C. J. Novotny, in pro. per., for Appellants.
Stearns, Luce & Forward for Respondent.

Opinion:
JENNINGS, J.
This is a motion by respondent to dismiss an appeal on the ground of failure to file a transcript.
The motion is supported by the certificate of the county clerk and the facts therein stated are not contradicted. From said certificate it appears that notice of appeal was filed on October 13, 1931, but that no bill of exceptions has been settled as provided by section 650 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and no transcript has been prepared in accordance with the provisions of section 953a of said code. The statutory period within which such a record may be prepared and filed has expired. The motion must therefore be granted and the appeal dismissed (Catania v. Guccione, 60 Cal. App. 717 [214 Pac. 495] ; People v. Berkeley Chiropractic College, 103 Cal. App. 139 [283 Pac. 981]; Bule V of the Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal). It is so ordered.
Marks, Acting P. J., and Morton, J., pro tem., concurred.