Case Name: Latroy M. SANDERS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2019-01-08
Citations: 565 S.W.3d 253
Docket Number: No. ED 106073
Parties: Latroy M. SANDERS, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 565
Pages: 253–253

Head Matter:
Latroy M. SANDERS, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 106073
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Filed: January 8, 2019
Maleaner R. Harvey, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Movant/Appellant.
Karen L. Kramer, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent/Respondent.
Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Latroy Sanders appeals from the motion court's judgment denying, following an evidentiary hearing, his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgement and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.15 . We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. (2017), unless otherwise indicated.