Case Name: SAMUEL J. GORDON, Respondent, v. ROBERT L. ROMBOTIS et al., Defendants; ELBERT, LTD. (a Corporation), Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1951-12-11
Citations: 38 Cal. 2d 879
Docket Number: L. A. No. 21703
Parties: SAMUEL J. GORDON, Respondent, v. ROBERT L. ROMBOTIS et al., Defendants; ELBERT, LTD. (a Corporation), Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Reports
Volume: 38
Pages: 879–879

Head Matter:
238 P.2d 992]
[L. A. No. 21703.
In Bank.
Dec. 11, 1951.]
SAMUEL J. GORDON, Respondent, v. ROBERT L. ROMBOTIS et al., Defendants; ELBERT, LTD. (a Corporation), Appellant.
John P. Bender and Gizella M. Allen for Appellant.
Charles I. Rosin for Respondent.
O ’Melveny & Myers, Louis W. Myers, Sidney H. Wall and Ernest M. Clark, Jr., as Amici Curiae on behalf of Respondent.

Opinion:
SPENCE, J.
This is a quiet title action presenting questions similar to certain questions determined in two cases this day filed, Scheas v. Robertson, L. A. No. 21357, ante, p. 119 [238 P.2d 982] and Sipe v. Correa, L. A. No. 21421, ante, p. 131 [238 P.2d 989]. Upon the authority of and for the reasons stated therein, plaintiff was correctly adjudicated a "bona fide purchaser for value" and entitled to rely on the conclusive presumption found in the 1945 amendment of section 2911 of the Civil Code.
The judgment is affirmed.
Gibson, C. J., Shenk, J., Edmonds, J., Carter, J., Traynor, J., and Schauer, J., concurred.