Case Name: CITY OF DUBUQUE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JADE ENGINEERING, LLC and Dubuque County, Iowa, Defendants-Appellees.
Court: Court of Appeals of Iowa
Jurisdiction: Iowa
Decision Date: 2018-04-18
Citations: 918 N.W.2d 502
Docket Number: No. 17-0056
Parties: CITY OF DUBUQUE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
JADE ENGINEERING, LLC and Dubuque County, Iowa, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Heard by Doyle, P.J., and Tabor and McDonald, JJ.
Reporter: North Western Reporter 2d
Volume: 918
Pages: 502–502

Head Matter:
CITY OF DUBUQUE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
JADE ENGINEERING, LLC and Dubuque County, Iowa, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 17-0056
Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Filed April 18, 2018
Crenna M. Brumwell, City Attorney, Dubuque, for appellant.
Stuart G. Hoover of Blair & Fitzsimmons, P.C., Dubuque, for appellees.
Heard by Doyle, P.J., and Tabor and McDonald, JJ.

Opinion:
MCDONALD, Judge.
The City of Dubuque pursues this appeal from an order denying its petition to obtain title to four pieces of real property claimed to be abandoned within the meaning of Iowa Code section 657A.10A (2016). On appeal, the city challenges the district court's findings of fact, application of fact to law, and ultimate conclusion the city failed to prove the parcels were abandoned within the meaning of the case. Our review is de novo. See Iowa Code § 657A.10A(1) ; Iowa R. App. P. 6.907 ( ); City of Council Bluffs v. Harder , No. 08-1315, 2009 WL 3775116, at *2 (Iowa Ct. App. Nov. 12, 2009). We are not bound by the district court's factual findings, but we give them weight, especially when considering the credibility of witnesses. See Iowa R. App. P. 6.904(3)(g). On de novo review, balancing all of the relevant statutory factors, like the district court, we conclude the city failed to prove the property was abandoned within the meaning of the Code. We affirm the judgment of the district court without further opinion. See Iowa Ct. R. 21.26 (a), (d).
AFFIRMED.