Case Name: Loy Ree B. Marlowe BALLAM, Appellee, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, and State of South Carolina, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1985-03-15
Citations: 757 F.2d 86
Docket Number: No. 83-1120
Parties: Loy Ree B. Marlowe BALLAM, Appellee, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, and State of South Carolina, Defendant.
Judges: Entered at the direction of Judge MURNAGHAN, with the concurrence of Judge PHILLIPS. Judge ERVIN dissents.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 757
Pages: 86–87

Head Matter:
Loy Ree B. Marlowe BALLAM, Appellee, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, and State of South Carolina, Defendant.
No. 83-1120.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
March 15, 1985.
Maria A. Iizuka, Dept, of Justice, Washington, D.C. (F. Henry Habicht, II, Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D.C., Henry Dargan McMaster, U.S. Atty., Glen E. Craig, Asst. U.S. Atty., Columbia, S.C., Robert L. Klarquist, Dept, of Justice, Washington, D.C., on brief), for appellant.
Augustine T. Smythe, Charleston, S.C. (Morris A. Ellison, Buist, Moore, Smythe & McGee, Charleston, S.C., H.F. Bell, Chesterfield, S.C., on brief), for appellee.

Opinion:
Before PHILLIPS, MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.
The appellee's petition for rehearing of 747 F.2d 915 and suggestion for rehearing in banc were submitted to this Court. As no member of the Court requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing in banc, and
As the panel considered the petition for rehearing and is of the opinion that it should be denied,
IT IS ORDERED that the petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in banc are denied.
Entered at the direction of Judge MURNAGHAN, with the concurrence of Judge PHILLIPS. Judge ERVIN dissents.