Case Name: Maurice G. Spiro, Respondent, v. The Brunswick-Balke-Collender Company, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1929-12
Citations: 228 A.D. 672
Docket Number: 
Parties: Maurice G. Spiro, Respondent, v. The Brunswick-Balke-Collender Company, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 228
Pages: 672–672

Head Matter:
Maurice G. Spiro, Respondent, v. The Brunswick-Balke-Collender Company, Appellant.

Opinion:
Order directing bill of particulars of defendant's affirmative defenses modified by striking out paragraphs 3, 4, 7 and 8 thereof, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. The defenses as to which the particulars were sought refer in terms to the " contract referred to " in the complaint, and the contract is, therefore, the same contract alleged by plaintiff in Ms complaint, the terms and conditions of wMch he must prove to establish Ms cause of action. No particulars of such contract are, therefore, necessary. Lazansky, P, J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Seudder, JJ., concur.