Case Name: Victor A. MARROW, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROANOKE ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORPORATION, Its Board of Directors; Delores Amason; Carolyn D. Bradley; Chester Deloatch; Johnnie P. Garner; Ken Jernigan; Darnell Lee; Millard Lee; Robert Riddick; Allen Speller; Curtis Wynn, Executive Vice-President & CEO; Eva Wiggins, Vice-President of Human Resources, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-04-20
Citations: 224 F. App'x 241
Docket Number: No. 06-2089
Parties: Victor A. MARROW, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROANOKE ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORPORATION, Its Board of Directors; Delores Amason; Carolyn D. Bradley; Chester Deloatch; Johnnie P. Garner; Ken Jernigan; Darnell Lee; Millard Lee; Robert Riddick; Allen Speller; Curtis Wynn, Executive Vice-President & CEO; Eva Wiggins, Vice-President of Human Resources, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 224
Pages: 241–242

Head Matter:
Victor A. MARROW, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROANOKE ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORPORATION, Its Board of Directors; Delores Amason; Carolyn D. Bradley; Chester Deloatch; Johnnie P. Garner; Ken Jernigan; Darnell Lee; Millard Lee; Robert Riddick; Allen Speller; Curtis Wynn, Executive Vice-President & CEO; Eva Wiggins, Vice-President of Human Resources, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 06-2089.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 21, 2007.
Decided: April 20, 2007.
D. Lynn Whitted, Goldsboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Laura J. Wetsch, Winslow Wetsch, P.L.L.C., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Victor A. Marrow appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Marrow v. Roanoke Elec. Membership Corp., No. 5:06-cv-00130-BR (E.D.N.C. Aug. 7, 2006). We deny Appellees' motion for sanctions under Fed. R.App. P. 38 because we cannot conclude Marrow pursued this litigation for malicious purposes, see Dyntel Corp. v. Ebner, 120 F.3d 488, 493 (4th Cir.1997), or has previously filed numerous frivolous suits or appeals, see Foley v. Fix, 106 F.3d 556, 558 (4th Cir.1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.