Case Name: In the Matter of the Opening of One Hundred and Twenty-seventh Street (Claim of James A. Deering)
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1893-12
Citations: 81 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 640
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Opening of One Hundred and Twenty-seventh Street (Claim of James A. Deering).
Judges: .Present — Yan Brunt, P. J., O’Brien and Follett, JJ.
Reporter: Supreme Court Reports (Hun)
Volume: 81
Pages: 640–640

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Opening of One Hundred and Twenty-seventh Street (Claim of James A. Deering).

Opinion:
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. —
Per Curiam
The record upon which this appeal is heard shows beyond dispute that the relation of attorney and client between Peering and James Baird never existed, and as that relation is the necessary foundation for an attorney's lien, it follows that the attorney has no lien upon the fund. The order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
.Present — Yan Brunt, P. J., O'Brien and Follett, JJ.