Case Name: James Charles SAULS, Appellant, v. Marguerite B. SAULS, Appellee
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1956-01-18
Citations: 84 So. 2d 700
Docket Number: 
Parties: James Charles SAULS, Appellant, v. Marguerite B. SAULS, Appellee.
Judges: DREW,. C. J., and TERRELL, HOB-SON and THORNAL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 84
Pages: 700–700

Head Matter:
James Charles SAULS, Appellant, v. Marguerite B. SAULS, Appellee.
Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.
Jan. 18, 1956.
Frank C; Decker, and Virgil L. Milbrath, Ocala, for appellant.
A. P. Buie, Ocala, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This cause came on, to be heard on the motion of appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to Rule 38 of the rules of this court, 30 F.S.A., and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;
It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be and the same is hereby granted and the judgment is
Affirmed.
DREW,. C. J., and TERRELL, HOB-SON and THORNAL, JJ., concur.