Case Name: Ali BOURESLAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARAMCO, Arabian American Oil Co. and Aramco Service Company, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1988-12-23
Citations: 863 F.2d 8
Docket Number: No. 87-2206
Parties: Ali BOURESLAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARAMCO, Arabian American Oil Co. and Aramco Service Company, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, KING, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH and DUHE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 863
Pages: 8–8

Head Matter:
Ali BOURESLAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARAMCO, Arabian American Oil Co. and Aramco Service Company, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 87-2206.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 23, 1988.
James Field Tyson, Neal H. Paster, Perry Archer, Houston, Tex., for Boureslan.
Charles A. Shanor, Vincent J. Black-wood, Karen MacRae, Attys., EEOC, Washington, D.C., for intervenor EEOC.
Edward E. Potter, McGuiness & Williams, Washington, D.C., for amicus EEAC.
John D. Roady, Linda Ottinger Headley, Hutcheson & Grundy, Houston, Tex., for Aramco.
Lawrence Z. Lorber, John E. Parauda, Breed, Abbott & Morgan, Washington, D.C., for amicus ASPA.
Cecil J. Olmstead, Steptoe & Johnson, Washington, D.C., for amicus Rule of Law Committee.

Opinion:
ON SUGGESTIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, KING, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH and DUHE, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestions for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.