Case Name: FLOWERS v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1912-06-19
Citations: 148 S.W. 564
Docket Number: 
Parties: FLOWERS v. STATE.
Judges: DAVIDSON, P. J., not sitting.
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 148
Pages: 564–564

Head Matter:
FLOWERS v. STATE.
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
June 19, 1912.)
Ceiminal Law (§ 1144 ) — Appeal—Review— Presumptions.
On a criminal appeal, the trial court will be presumed to have correctly presented the law to the jury, in the absence of a statement of facts.
• [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2736-2781, 2901, 3016-3037; Dec. Dig. § 1144. ]
,. Appeal from Criminal District Court, Dallas County; Robt. B. Slay, Judge.
' Jim Flowers was convicted of an offense, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
For other eases see same topic and section NUMBER in Dec. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key No. Series & Rep’r Indexes

Opinion:
HARPER, J.
There is neither a statement of facts accompanying the record, nor any bills of exceptions in the record. The court submitted the offense charged in the indictment, and in the absence of a statement of facts we must presume the court correctly presented the law.
The judgment is affirmed.
DAVIDSON, P. J., not sitting.