Case Name: CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK, APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT ET AL., RESPONDENTS
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1920-06-14
Citations: 94 N.J.L. 558
Docket Number: 
Parties: CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK, APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 94
Pages: 558–558

Head Matter:
CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK, APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Argued March 4, 1920
Decided June 14, 1920.
On appeal from tlie Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 94 N. ,T. L. 46. '
For the appellant, Thomas II. Eagerty and Robert II. McCarter. • \
For the respondents, Thomas F. McGran, attorney-general, and Fragile Bergen.

Opinion:
Pee Cueiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bergen in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance—The Chief Justice, Swayze, Parker, Mintuen, Kalisoi-i, Black, White, Heppeni-ieimer, Williams, Tayloe, Gardner, Aokerson, 'JJ. 12.
For revei'sal—None.