Case Name: Loyce MEANS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1992-02-27
Citations: 825 S.W.2d 260
Docket Number: No. 01-92-00040-CR
Parties: Loyce MEANS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
Judges: Before SAM BASS, COHEN and WILSON, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 825
Pages: 260–261

Head Matter:
Loyce MEANS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
No. 01-92-00040-CR.
Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.).
Feb. 27, 1992.
Donald Davis, Houston, for appellant.
John B. Holmes, Houston, for appellee.
Before SAM BASS, COHEN and WILSON, JJ.

Opinion:
OPINION
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from an order denying the appellant's motion for recusal and disqualification of the trial judge in a criminal prosecution, after the appellant was granted a mistrial. The order complained of is interlocutory. We have no jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders except in narrow circumstances not present here. See Ex parte Robinson, 641 S.W.2d 552, 555 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1982) (pretrial appellate review of double jeopardy claims is constitutionally compelled). Therefore, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Casias v. State, 503 S.W.2d 262, 265 (Tex.Crim.App.1973); Petty v. State, 800 S.W.2d 582, 583 (Tex.App.—Tyler 1990, no pet.); Tex.R.App.P. 41(b)(1).