Case Name: Robert Anthony WINTERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Susan HUBBARD, Director of CDCR; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-05-03
Citations: 430 F. App'x 626
Docket Number: No. 10-15667
Parties: Robert Anthony WINTERS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Susan HUBBARD, Director of CDCR; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 430
Pages: 626–627

Head Matter:
Robert Anthony WINTERS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Susan HUBBARD, Director of CDCR; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
No. 10-15667.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 20, 2011.
Filed May 3, 2011.
Robert Anthony Winters, Soledad, CA, pro se.
Before: RYMER, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
California state prisoner Robert Anthony Winters appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to obey a court order. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion, Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir.1992), and we affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Winters's action after twice providing notice, an opportunity to amend, and a warning that failure to amend or provide notice of his desire to proceed with the claims that survived screening would lead to dismissal. See id. at 1261 (district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing for failure to obey a court order where litigation had lasted a year and a half and district court had provided plaintiff with opportunities to amend, instructions, and notice of potential dismissal for failure to obey the order); see also Edwards v. Marin Park, Inc., 356 F.3d 1058, 1065 (9th Cir.2004) (plaintiffs failure to amend complaint or notify court of intent to stand on unamended complaint justifies dismissal under Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b)).
Winters's remaining contentions are unpersuasive.
Winters's emergency motion, filed on July 8, 2010, is construed as a motion to supplement the opening brief and to supplement the record on appeal, and is denied.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.