Case Name: William S. Ketcham, Jr., complainant-respondent, v. George W. Ketcham, administrator, &c., defendant-appellant
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1918-01-31
Citations: 88 N.J. Eq. 601
Docket Number: 
Parties: William S. Ketcham, Jr., complainant-respondent, v. George W. Ketcham, administrator, &c., defendant-appellant.
Judges: For affirmance — Garrison, Swayze, Trenchakd, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner — 12.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 88
Pages: 601–601

Head Matter:
William S. Ketcham, Jr., complainant-respondent, v. George W. Ketcham, administrator, &c., defendant-appellant.
[Decided January 31st, 1918.]
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Emery, whose opinion is reported in 8k N. J. Eq. 577.
Mr. William S. Ketcham, Jr., pro se, for the respondent.
Mr. Frank E. Bradner, for the appellant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Emery.
For affirmance — Garrison, Swayze, Trenchakd, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner — 12.
For reversal — None.