Case Name: Freddie B. JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF CDC, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-07-23
Citations: 14 F. App'x 924
Docket Number: No. 01-15618; D.C. No. CV-00-02730-DFL
Parties: Freddie B. JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF CDC, DefendantAppellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 14
Pages: 924–925

Head Matter:
Freddie B. JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF CDC, DefendantAppellee.
No. 01-15618.
D.C. No. CV-00-02730-DFL.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 9, 2001.
Decided July 23, 2001.
Before KOZINSKI, T.G. NELSON, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, we deny Jackson's request for oral argument.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Freddie B. Jackson appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action because he failed to inform the court of an address change as required under Local Rule 83-182(d). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We re view the district court's dismissal pursuant to its local rules for abuse of discretion, and we affirm. See Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 53 (9th Cir.1995) (per curiam).
Because this case does not present exceptional circumstances on appeal, we deny Jackson's request for appointment of counsel. See Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir.1991).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.