Case Name: Olga TARASENKO, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS, et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-10-01
Citations: 616 F. App'x 214
Docket Number: No. 15-1159
Parties: Olga TARASENKO, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 616
Pages: 214–214

Head Matter:
Olga TARASENKO, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15-1159.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 23, 2015.
Filed: Oct. 1, 2015.
Benjamin Patrick Cowan, Clark Wharton Mason, Clark Mason Attorneys, Little Rock, AR, Robert Steven Tschiemer, Robert S. Tschiemer, P.A., Mayflower, AR, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Matthew Blayne McCoy, Assistant Attorney General, University of Arkansas Office of General- Counsel, Little Rock, AR, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Olga Tarasenko appeals the dismissal of her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint alleging that her termination as a tenured biology professor at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock violated her federal constitutional rights to substantive and procedural due process, and the subsequent denial of her motion for leave to file an amended complaint. After careful de novo review of the record, see Zutz v. Nelson, 601 F.3d 842, 848-50 (8th Cir.2010), we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's orders dismissing Ms. Tarasenko's due process claims and denying her motion for leave to amend. See 8th Cir. Rule 47B.
. The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.