Case Name: Mazur Brothers, Inc., Appellant, v. State of New York, Respondent; Mazur Brothers Realty, LLC, Appellant, v. State of New York, Respondent; Mazur Brothers Realty, LLC, Appellant, v. State of New York, Respondent; Mazur Brothers, Inc., Appellant, v. State of New York, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2009-02-03
Citations: 59 A.D.3d 400
Docket Number: Claim No. 1; Claim No. 2; Claim No. 3; Claim No. 4; Claim Nos. 112658, 112659, 112660, 112661
Parties: Mazur Brothers, Inc., Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent. Mazur Brothers Realty, LLC, Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent. Mazur Brothers Realty, LLC, Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent. Mazur Brothers, Inc., Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 59
Pages: 400–401

Head Matter:
Mazur Brothers, Inc., Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent. Mazur Brothers Realty, LLC, Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent. Mazur Brothers Realty, LLC, Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent. Mazur Brothers, Inc., Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent.
(Claim No. 1.)
(Claim No. 2.)
(Claim No. 3.)
(Claim No. 4.)
(Claim Nos. 112658, 112659, 112660, 112661.)
[872 NYS2d 671]

Opinion:
In four related claims,- inter alia, to recover damages for the taking of real property without just compensation, the claimants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Court of Claims (Scuccimarra, J.), dated August 28, 2007, as granted the defendant's motion for leave to reargue that branch of its prior motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7), in effect, to dismiss that portion of claim No. 112660 which was to recover damages for the taking of real property without just compensation, which had been determined in an order dated May 15, 2007, and, upon reargument, granted that branch of the motion.
Ordered that the appeal by the claimant Mazur Brothers, Inc., is dismissed, as it is not aggrieved by the portion of the order appealed from (see CPLR 5511); and it is further,
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from by the claimant Mazur Brothers Realty, LLC, with costs.
Under all the circumstances presented, the Court of Claims properly granted the defendant's motion for leave to reargue and, upon reargument, properly granted that branch of the defendant's prior motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss that portion of claim No. 112660 which was to recover damages for the taking of real property, allegedly without just compensation. Rivera, J.P., Angiolillo, Eng and Belen, JJ., concur.