Case Name: Gina M. LINDEN, Appellant, v. REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2018-01-05
Citations: 232 So. 3d 537
Docket Number: Case No. 5D17-1051
Parties: Gina M. LINDEN, Appellant, v. REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION, Appellee.
Judges: ORFINGER, EVANDER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 232
Pages: 537–538

Head Matter:
Gina M. LINDEN, Appellant, v. REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION, Appellee.
Case No. 5D17-1051
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Opinion filed January 5, 2018
Gina M. Linden, Windermere, pro se.
Amanda L. Neff, Deputy General Counsel and Chief Appellate Attorney, of Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Gina M. Linden appeals from an order of the Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission ("RAAC") dismissing her appeal of an administrative decision denying unemployment compensation benefits as untimely. We affirm.
Ms. Linden contends that she had good cause for failing to timely file her appeal with the RAAC. Unfortunately, section 443.151(4)(b)l., Florida Statutes (2016), which governs appeals from RAAC determinations, does not provide a "good cause" exception that would permit the RAAC to accept an untimely appeal. See Thurman v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 881 So.2d 89, 91 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). The courts have carved out a limited exception in cases where the claimant alleges the untimeliness of unemployment appeals was "occasioned by the actions of the Commission." Assam v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 871 So.2d 978, 980 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004). However, that has not been demonstrated here. Therefore, although sympathetic to her plight, we must affirm the RAAC decision.
AFFIRMED.
ORFINGER, EVANDER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.