Case Name: Isabela ORTIZ-JUAREZ, also known as Diana Carhual-Gomez, Petitioner v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-09-09
Citations: 612 F. App'x 406
Docket Number: No. 15-1271
Parties: Isabela ORTIZ-JUAREZ, also known as Diana Carhual-Gomez, Petitioner v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General of the United States , Respondent.
Judges: Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 612
Pages: 406–407

Head Matter:
Isabela ORTIZ-JUAREZ, also known as Diana Carhual-Gomez, Petitioner v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General of the United States , Respondent.
No. 15-1271.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 8, 2015.
Filed: Sept. 9, 2015.
Marisa-Andrea Moore, Law Office of Marisa-Andrea Moore, Pacoima, CA, for Petitioner.
Karen Yolanda Drummond, Carl H. Meintyre, Christina Parascandola, Thankful Townsend Vanderstar, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
. Loretta E. Lynch has been appointed to serve as Attorney General of the United States, and is substituted as respondent pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Isabela Ortiz^Juarez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming an immigration judge's denial of her application for asylum and withholding of removal. After careful consideration of the record and the parties' submissions, see Davila-Mejia v. Mukasey, 531 F.3d 624, 627 (8th Cir.2008), we deny the petition, because we conclude that substantial evidence supports the finding that Ortiz-Juarez failed.to establish past persecution, or a well-founded-fear of future persecution, on account of any protected ground, see Mambwe v. Holder, 572 F.3d 540, 546 (8th Cir.2009). The petition for review is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The ruling denying Convention Against Torture relief is not before us in this petition for review, because Ortiz failed to "raise it before the BIA.