Case Name: Fredrick INGRAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1986-01-29
Citations: 481 So. 2d 1006
Docket Number: No. 85-372
Parties: Fredrick INGRAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: HERSEY, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and HURLEY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 481
Pages: 1006–1006

Head Matter:
Fredrick INGRAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 85-372.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jan. 29, 1986.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Ellen Morris, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Carolyn V. McCann, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Defendant's conviction is affirmed, but the sentence is vacated because of the trial court's failure to provide written justification for its departure from the presumptive sentence. See Rule 3.701(b)(6), Fla.R. Crim.P.; State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985); Boynton v. State, 473 So.2d 703 (Fla. 4th DCA), aff'd, 478 So.2d 351 (Fla.1985). On remand, we respectfully direct the trial court's attention to Hendrix v. State, 475 So.2d 1218 (Fla.1985) (inappropriate considerations for departure); and Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984) (notice required prior to imposition of costs).
CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.
HERSEY, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and HURLEY, JJ., concur.