Case Name: Edward J. Backenstos, Respondent, v. Celia A. Holmes, Appellant, and Others, Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1918-03
Citations: 183 A.D. 908
Docket Number: 
Parties: Edward J. Backenstos, Respondent, v. Celia A. Holmes, Appellant, and Others, Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 183
Pages: 908–908

Head Matter:
Edward J. Backenstos, Respondent, v. Celia A. Holmes, Appellant, and Others, Defendants.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Opinion:
No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Mills, Putnam and Kelly, JJ., concurred; Blaekmar, J., dissented upon the ground that the judgment cannot be affirmed without overruling the ease of Patterson v. Youngs (154 App. Div. 536).