Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dennis HARRIS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-10-02
Citations: 479 F. App'x 493
Docket Number: No. 12-6978
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dennis HARRIS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 479
Pages: 493–493

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dennis HARRIS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-6978.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 27, 2012.
Decided: Oct. 2, 2012.
Dennis Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Ap-pellee.
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Dennis Harris appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to Amendment 750 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (2011). We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court properly determined that Harris was not eligible for a sentence reduction because Amendment 750 did not lower his Guidelines range. To the extent that Harris reasserts the argument he raised in the district court regarding the calculation of the drug quantity attributable to him, that argument is foreclosed by Dillon v. United States, — U.S. —, 130 S.Ct. 2683, 2693-94, 177 L.Ed.2d 271 (2010). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Harris, No. 2:92-cr-00113-l (E.D.Va. filed May 10, 2012 & entered May 11, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.