Case Name: Timmy L. SUMPTER, Appellant, v. Alan BLAKE, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2008-04-15
Citations: 249 S.W.3d 924
Docket Number: No. ED 90621
Parties: Timmy L. SUMPTER, Appellant, v. Alan BLAKE, Respondent.
Judges: BOOKER T. SHAW and NANNETTE A. BAKER, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 249
Pages: 924–925

Head Matter:
Timmy L. SUMPTER, Appellant, v. Alan BLAKE, Respondent.
No. ED 90621.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
April 15, 2008.
Timmy L. Sumpter, Farmington, MO, pro se.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Opinion:
PATRICIA L. COHEN, Chief Judge.
Timmy Sumpter appeals from a judgment denying his petition for writ of habe-as corpus. The appeal is dismissed.
If this Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain an appeal, then it should be dismissed. Buff v. Roper, 155 S.W.3d 811, 812 (Mo.App. E.D.2005). Appellant seeks to appeal from the circuit court's judgment dismissing his petition for writ of habeas corpus. An appeal does not lie from the denial or dismissal of a petition for habeas corpus. Blackmon v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, 97 S.W.3d 458 (Mo. banc 2003); Garner v. Roper, 224 S.W.3d 623 (Mo.App. E.D.2007).
We issued an order directing Appellant to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed. Appellant filed a response asking this Court to address the merits of his appeal. However, if this Court does not have jurisdiction, then it cannot address the merits of the appeal. Appellant's remedy, if any, is where a petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied is to file a new writ petition in a higher court. Webster v. Purkett, 110 S.W.3d 832, 837 (Mo.App. E.D.2003). We decline to treat his appeal as an extraordinary writ petition.
The appeal is dismissed for lack of an appealable judgment.
BOOKER T. SHAW and NANNETTE A. BAKER, JJ., Concur.