Case Name: Conan MCDANIEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PIEDMONT REGIONAL JAIL, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-05-14
Citations: 227 F. App'x 290
Docket Number: No. 07-6116
Parties: Conan MCDANIEL, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. PIEDMONT REGIONAL JAIL, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 227
Pages: 290–291

Head Matter:
Conan MCDANIEL, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. PIEDMONT REGIONAL JAIL, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 07-6116.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 10, 2007.
Decided: May 14, 2007.
Conan McDaniel, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Conan McDaniel appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice for failure to comply with a court order to particularize his complaint and demonstrate that he had exhausted administrative remedies. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order McDaniel seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1067 (4th Cir.1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.