Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clifton J. TUCKER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-05-28
Citations: 573 F. App'x 250
Docket Number: No. 13-8002
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clifton J. TUCKER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 573
Pages: 250–251

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clifton J. TUCKER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-8002.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 22, 2014.
Decided: May 28, 2014.
Clifton J. Tucker, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Arlen Jagels, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Stephen Wiley Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Clifton J. Tucker appeals the district court's order denying relief on his motion for reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Tucker, No. 3:09-cr-00373-REP-1 (E.D.Va. Sept. 11, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.