Case Name: Lena Joann GRATZER, Appellant, v. William M. GRATZER, Sr., Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-12-18
Citations: 62 S.W.3d 724
Docket Number: No. ED 78734
Parties: Lena Joann GRATZER, Appellant, v. William M. GRATZER, Sr., Respondent.
Judges: Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., P.J., and PAUL J. SIMON and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 62
Pages: 724–724

Head Matter:
Lena Joann GRATZER, Appellant, v. William M. GRATZER, Sr., Respondent.
No. ED 78734.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Dec. 18, 2001.
Donald E. Heck, Clayton, MO, for appellant.
David L. Baylard, Union, MO, for respondent.
Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., P.J., and PAUL J. SIMON and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Lena JoAnn Gratzer (Wife) appeals from the judgment and decree dissolving her marriage to William M. Gratzer, Sr. (Husband). We find the judgment and decree of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).