Case Name: RICHARD M. GARFINKLE, Appellant, v. SHERIFF, WASHOE COUNTY, NEVADA, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada
Jurisdiction: Nevada
Decision Date: 1974-12-20
Citations: 90 Nev. 418
Docket Number: No. 7612
Parties: RICHARD M. GARFINKLE, Appellant, v. SHERIFF, WASHOE COUNTY, NEVADA, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Nevada Reports
Volume: 90
Pages: 418–419

Head Matter:
RICHARD M. GARFINKLE, Appellant, v. SHERIFF, WASHOE COUNTY, NEVADA, Respondent.
No. 7612
December 20, 1974
529 P.2d 794
Stanley H. Brown and Harold G. Albright, of Reno, for Appellant.
Robert List, Attorney General, Carson City; Robert E. Rose, District Attorney, and Michael E. Malloy, Deputy District Attorney, Washoe County, for Respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION
Per Curiam:
In this appeal from an order denying a pretrial petition for habeas corpus, we believe evidence presented to the grand jury justified its indictment of appellant. At this juncture we need not and do not decide whether such evidence would support a conviction. Cf. McDonald v. Sheriff, 89 Nev. 326, 512 P.2d 774 (1973); Maskaly v. State, 85 Nev. 111, 450 P.2d 790 (1969).
Other contentions raised by appellant have previously been considered and rejected. See Cairns v. Sheriff, 89 Nev. 113, 508 P.2d 1015 (1973); Mears v. State, 83 Nev. 3, 422 P.2d 230 (1967); and, cf. Schmitt v. State, 88 Nev. 320, 497 P.2d 891 (1972).
The order denying habeas relief is affirmed.