Case Name: STATE of Florida ex rel. Eugenio AMARO, Relator, v. Honorable Murray GOODMAN, as one of the Judges of the Criminal Court of Record for Dade County, Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1970-01-20
Citations: 231 So. 2d 271
Docket Number: No. 69-948
Parties: STATE of Florida ex rel. Eugenio AMARO, Relator, v. Honorable Murray GOODMAN, as one of the Judges of the Criminal Court of Record for Dade County, Florida, Respondent.
Judges: Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and SWANN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 231
Pages: 271–271

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida ex rel. Eugenio AMARO, Relator, v. Honorable Murray GOODMAN, as one of the Judges of the Criminal Court of Record for Dade County, Florida, Respondent.
No. 69-948.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
Jan. 20, 1970.
Rehearing Denied March 5, 1970.
David N. Nissenberg, Miami, for relator.
Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Arden M. Siegendorf and Ronald W. Sabo, Asst. Attys. Gen., Richard E. Gerstein, Robert Egan, State’s Attys., Orlando, for respondent.
Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and SWANN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This court having issued a rule nisi in prohibition herein, and the cause having come on for hearing following the filing of the response and the briefs of the parties, and this court having considered the pleadings and briefs and arguments of counsel, and being of the opinion that no sufficient showing has been made for the issuance of a writ of prohibition, the rule nisi heretofore issued in this cause is discharged and the suggestion in prohibition is dismissed on authority of Hart v. State, 144 Fla. 409, 198 So. 120, 125.
It is so ordered.