Case Name: SARAH J. TEDFORD, Appellant, v. LESLIE F. GAY et al., Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1912-03-02
Citations: 162 Cal. 761
Docket Number: L. A. No. 3029
Parties: SARAH J. TEDFORD, Appellant, v. LESLIE F. GAY et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Reports
Volume: 162
Pages: 761–762

Head Matter:
[L. A. No. 3029.
Department Two.
March 2, 1912.]
SARAH J. TEDFORD, Appellant, v. LESLIE F. GAY et al., Respondents.
Judgment and order affirmed on the authority of Bedford v. Eichler, ante, p. 214, [121 Pac. 730].
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order refusing a new trial. W. R„ Hervey, Judge.
The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion in Ted-ford v. Bidder, cunte, p. 214, [121 Pac. 730].
G. L. Whitham, for Appellant.
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Hammack & Hammack, E. T. Sherer, and Joseph Smith, for Respondents.

Opinion:
THE COURT.
The above entitled cause presents the same propositions considered in Tedford v. Eichler (L. A. No. 2772), ante, p. 214, [121 Pac. 730], and was submitted with the last mentioned case for decision. For the reasons there given the judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.
Hearing in Bank denied.