Case Name: Goodis v. Stehle, Appellant
Court: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1926-02-26
Citations: 87 Pa. Super. 336
Docket Number: Appeal No. 156
Parties: Goodis v. Stehle, Appellant.
Judges: Before Porter, Henderson, Trexler, Keller, Linn and Gawthrop, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania Superior Court Reports
Volume: 87
Pages: 336–338

Head Matter:
Goodis v. Stehle, Appellant.
Argued October 15, 1925.
Before Porter, Henderson, Trexler, Keller, Linn and Gawthrop, JJ.
Arthur Sellers, for appellant.
Benjamin H. Levintow, for appellee.
February 26, 1926:

Opinion:
Opinion by
Keller, J.,
Defendant appeals from the order of the court below refusing to open a judgment confessed by warrant of attorney, and let him into a defense.
The warrant of attorney was contained in a paper signed by defendant in which he employed plaintiff as his agent to sell certain real estate, and his garage business incident thereto, agreeing to pay the latter a commission of five per centum on the selling price, $31,000. This writing provided that plaintiff's commission should become imifiediately due and payable upon violation of the agreement by defendant or upon any sale, lease or exchange being consummated; and plaintiff was authorized "to immediately enter up the confession of judgment as soon as the said sum [became] due and payable by reason of any of the contingencies herein contained." No authority was given plaintiff to confess judgment against defendant unless he secured a purchaser in strict compliance with the terms of his employment or unless defendant violated his agreement by increasing the price, or by withdrawing siadd property and business from sale by plaintiff during the term of the agreement, or unless defendant sold the property and business to plaintiff or anyone else during the term of the agreement, or to anyone after termination of the agreement, if such purchaser was secured directly or indirectly by plaintiff.
It was not shown that defendant had violated any of the terms of his agreement entitling plaintiff to enter up the confession of judgment, and no sale, lease or exchange of the property and business was consummated. Plaintiff was not justified in having judgment confessed against defendant by warrant of attorney, because the latter refused to approve an agreement of sale which contained material provisions not stipulated in the contract of employment and not assented to by him.
The order is reversed, and the record remitted to the court below with directions to make absolute the rule to open the judgment and let the defendant into a defense.