Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nigel Nicholas DOUGLAS, a/k/a Junior, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-11-23
Citations: 455 F. App'x 360
Docket Number: No. 11-6862
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Nigel Nicholas DOUGLAS, a/k/a Junior, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before KING, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 455
Pages: 360–361

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Nigel Nicholas DOUGLAS, a/k/a Junior, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 11-6862.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 17, 2011.
Decided: Nov. 23, 2011.
Nigel Nicholas Douglas, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Michael Comstock, Robert Joseph Seidel, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before KING, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Nigel Nicholas Douglas appeals the district court's order dismissing what it construed as a duplicate of his initial 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)(2) (West 2000 & Supp. 2011) motion for sentence modification. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. See United States v. Douglas, No. 2:93-cr-00131- HCM-7 (E.D.Va. May 24, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.