Case Name: Cornell PRICE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2007-09-25
Citations: 233 S.W.3d 763
Docket Number: No. ED 88615
Parties: Cornell PRICE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., BOOKER T. SHAW, J., NANETTE A. BAKER, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 233
Pages: 763–764

Head Matter:
Cornell PRICE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 88615.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Sept. 25, 2007.
Maleaner Ryna Harvey, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, Daniel Neal McPherson — co-counsel, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., BOOKER T. SHAW, J., NANETTE A. BAKER, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Cornell Price, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that his counsel coerced him into pleading guilty because he could not afford to pay counsel's fees for a trial.
The motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).