Case Name: FREDERICK E. MOHRMANN, PROSECUTOR, v. TOWN OF BLOOMFIELD ET AL., DEFENDANTS
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1927-09-15
Citations: 5 N.J. Misc. 885
Docket Number: 
Parties: FREDERICK E. MOHRMANN, PROSECUTOR, v. TOWN OF BLOOMFIELD ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 5
Pages: 885–885

Head Matter:
FREDERICK E. MOHRMANN, PROSECUTOR, v. TOWN OF BLOOMFIELD ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
Argued September 9, 1927
Decided September 15, 1927.
Before Justices Trenchard, Kaltsor and Katzenbacii.
Eor the'prosecutor, Thomas Brunetio.
Eor the defendant Fabric Eire Hose Company, Osborne & Asllrnj.
Eor the defendant town of Bloomfield, Raymond F. Davis.

Opinion:
Two writs are applied for; one to review an ordinance of the town of Bloomfield appropriating money for the purchase of fire hose, and another to review the resolution awarding the contract to the Fabric Fire Hose Company.
After full and careful examination of the points made by the prosecutor in the light of affidavits we are of the opinion that there is no irregularity either in the ordinance or the resolution, or in the proceedings leading up to either, sufficient in our judgment to justify us in awarding either writ applied for.
Both applications are denied accordingly, but without costs.