Case Name: William G. THOMAS, Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2004-09-08
Citations: 881 So. 2d 1188
Docket Number: No. 1D03-3400
Parties: William G. THOMAS, Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellee.
Judges: ERVIN, BOOTH, and KAHN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 881
Pages: 1188–1189

Head Matter:
William G. THOMAS, Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellee.
No. 1D03-3400.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Sept. 8, 2004.
Appellant William G. Thomas, pro se.
Charles J. Crist, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The circuit court should have considered appellant's Motion for Reconsideration as a Motion to Amend the Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Given that the motion set forth additional facts that refuted the factual conclusions reached by the court in denying the Petition for Writ of Mandamus, such motion should have been granted. See Cason v. Fla. Parole Comm'n, 819 So.2d 1012, 1013 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); Hall v. Key, 476 So.2d 787, 789 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.
ERVIN, BOOTH, and KAHN, JJ., concur.