Case Name: JAMES CUNNINGHAM, RESPONDENT, v. RICHARD ASHURST, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1944-09-14
Citations: 132 N.J.L. 170
Docket Number: 
Parties: JAMES CUNNINGHAM, RESPONDENT, v. RICHARD ASHURST, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 132
Pages: 170–170

Head Matter:
JAMES CUNNINGHAM, RESPONDENT, v. RICHARD ASHURST, APPELLANT.
Argued May 17, 1944
Decided September 14, 1944.
For the respondent, James M. Davis, Jr.
For the appellant, Howard Fasiwood.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bodine in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Donges, Porter, Dear, Wells, Rapeerty, Hague, JJ. 8.
For reversal — Case, Heher, Thompson, Dill, JJ. 4.