Case Name: Kirk A. CANO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-11-08
Citations: 830 So. 2d 205
Docket Number: No. 5D02-829
Parties: Kirk A. CANO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: HARRIS, GRIFFIN and SAWAYA, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 830
Pages: 205–205

Head Matter:
Kirk A. CANO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D02-829.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Nov. 8, 2002.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and George D.E. Burden, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Kirk A. Cano, Gainesville, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Lori N. Hagan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Kirk Cano, appeals the summary denial of his second rule 3.850 motion. We affirm the trial court's denial of the motion as successive. See Pope v. State, 702 So.2d 221 (Fla.1997). However, the affirmance is without prejudice to Appellant filing a proper rale 3.800(a) motion challenging his prison releasee reoffender sentence. See Grant v. State, 770 So.2d 655 (Fla.2000).
AFFIRMED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
HARRIS, GRIFFIN and SAWAYA, JJ., concur.