Case Name: In the Matter of James Douglas IMPSON, Debtor. James Douglas Impson, Appellant, v. Daniel Jacob Goldberg, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-07-21
Citations: 143 F. App'x 574
Docket Number: No. 04-41358
Parties: In the Matter of James Douglas IMPSON, Debtor. James Douglas Impson, Appellant, v. Daniel Jacob Goldberg, Appellee.
Judges: Before DAVIS, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 143
Pages: 574–575

Head Matter:
In the Matter of James Douglas IMPSON, Debtor. James Douglas Impson, Appellant, v. Daniel Jacob Goldberg, Appellee.
No. 04-41358.
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Decided July 21, 2005.
James Douglas Impson, Federal Correetional Institution, Beaumont, TX, pro se.
Before DAVIS, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
James Impson is a pro se federal prisoner. He filed a chapter 7 bankruptcy proceeding as debtor. In the bankruptcy court, creditor Daniel Goldberg moved to dismiss, and Impson filed no opposition. The bankruptcy court accordingly entered an order of dismissal on July 16, 2004
Impson filed a notice of appeal to the district court 35 days later, on September 2, 2004. The district court dismissed the appeal on the ground that it was untimely under Fed. Bankr.R. 8002(a), which requires that a notice of appeal be filed within 10 days. Impson timely filed a notice of appeal to this court.
In his brief, Impson admits that he "is unable to offer any legal authority which supports his claim, so [he] will appeal to the common sense of this court to decide the issues." Impson asserts that he did not always receive his mail in prison. As the district court noted, however, under Fed. Bankr.R. 9002, "[l]ack of notice of the entry [of a judgment or order] does not affect the time to appeal or authorize the court to relieve a party for failure to appeal within the time allowed."
The district court was correct in dismissing the appeal to it. The district court's judgment of dismissal, accordingly, is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.