Case Name: ASG INDUSTRIES, INC., PPG Industries, Inc., Libbey-Owens-Ford Company, and C E Glass, Appellants, v. The UNITED STATES, Appellee
Court: Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1979-11-29
Citations: 610 F.2d 785
Docket Number: Appeal No. 79-16
Parties: ASG INDUSTRIES, INC., PPG Industries, Inc., Libbey-Owens-Ford Company, and C E Glass, Appellants, v. The UNITED STATES, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 610
Pages: 785–786

Head Matter:
ASG INDUSTRIES, INC., PPG Industries, Inc., Libbey-Owens-Ford Company, and C E Glass, Appellants, v. The UNITED STATES, Appellee.
Appeal No. 79-16.
United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.
Nov. 29, 1979.
Eugene L. Stewart, Frederick L. Ikenson, Washington, D. C., attorneys of record, for appellants.
Barbara Allen Babcock, Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D. C., David M. Cohen, Director, Joseph I. Liebman, John J. Mahon, Sidney N. Weiss, New York City, for the U. S. ’
Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, BALDWIN, MILLER and PENN, Judges.
The Honorable John G. Penn, United States District Court for the District of Columbia, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
MILLER, Judge.
This is an appeal from the judgment of the United States Customs Court, 82 Cust.Ct. —, C.D. 4788 (1979), which upheld the decision of the Secretary of the Treasury that float glass manufactured in Great Britain did not benefit from the payment or bestowal of a bounty or grant within the meaning of section 303 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. § 1303). For the same reasons set forth in the opinion in ASG Industries, Inc. v. United States, 610 F.2d 770, No. 79-15, decided concurrently herewith, the judgment of the Customs Court is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings.
MARKEY, C. J., and RICH, J., dissent.