Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Samuel H. Kauffman, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1933-05
Citations: 239 A.D. 876
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Samuel H. Kauffman, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 239
Pages: 876–876

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Samuel H. Kauffman, Appellant.
Affd., 262 N. Y. 679.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Although the court should have received proof of the circumstances under which the defendant's testimony before the grand jury was given, including the so-called agreement with the district attorney (People v. Kurtz, 42 Hun, 335, 3,44; State v. Berberick, 38 Mont. 423; Kirk v. Territory, 10 Okla. 46; Young v. State, 68 Ala. 569; State v. Barker, 56 Wash. 510; People v. Joyce, 233 N. Y. 61), we think the error in view of the entire record could not have affected the result and may, therefore, be disregarded. All concur. Judgment of conviction affirmed.