Case Name: Terrence McCRADY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The TOWN OF WARDENSVILLE; Hardy County; William D. Moomau; Donald Rotruck; David Warren, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-02-12
Citations: 55 F. App'x 682
Docket Number: No. 02-2421
Parties: Terrence McCRADY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The TOWN OF WARDENSVILLE; Hardy County; William D. Moomau; Donald Rotruck; David Warren, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 55
Pages: 682–682

Head Matter:
Terrence McCRADY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The TOWN OF WARDENSVILLE; Hardy County; William D. Moomau; Donald Rotruck; David Warren, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 02-2421.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 6, 2003.
Decided Feb. 12, 2003.
Terrence McCrady, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Douglas Lorensen, Bowles, Rice, McDavid, Graff & Love, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Terrence McCrady appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. See McCrady v. Town of Wardensville, No. CA-02-23-3 (N.D.W.Va. Nov. 7, 2002). We deny McCrady's motion for oral argument and his motion to strike Appellees' informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.