Case Name: John HERISE, Appellant, v. TATUM, GOMEZ, SMITH and VITALE CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1987-07-14
Citations: 509 So. 2d 988
Docket Number: No. 86-1684
Parties: John HERISE, Appellant, v. TATUM, GOMEZ, SMITH and VITALE CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and BASKIN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 509
Pages: 988–988

Head Matter:
John HERISE, Appellant, v. TATUM, GOMEZ, SMITH and VITALE CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.
No. 86-1684.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 14, 1987.
Abramson & Magidson and John Abram-son, Miami, for appellant.
Preddy, Kutner, Hardy, Rubinoff, Brown & Thompson and G. William Bissett, Miami, for appellee.
Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and BASKIN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Ford Motor Company v. Kikis, 401 So.2d 1341 (Fla.1981); United Technologies Communications Company v. Industrial Risk Insurers, 501 So.2d 46 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Consolidated Mutual Insurance Company v. Hampton Shops, Inc., 332 So.2d 101 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Wallace v. Rashkow, 270 So.2d 743 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); Section 59.041 Florida Statutes (1985).