Case Name: Maurice FREEMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-06-12
Citations: 46 S.W.3d 663
Docket Number: No. WD 58489
Parties: Maurice FREEMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before THOMAS H. NEWTON, Presiding Judge, JOSEPH M. ELLIS, and RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Judges.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 46
Pages: 663–664

Head Matter:
Maurice FREEMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 58489.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
June 12, 2001.
Tara L. Jensen, Asst. Public Defender, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Andrea Mazza Follett, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before THOMAS H. NEWTON, Presiding Judge, JOSEPH M. ELLIS, and RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Maurice Freeman appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary-hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.1603).