Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Angel HARO-PEREZ, a.k.a. UM-23, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-04-27
Citations: 376 F. App'x 923
Docket Number: No. 09-14946
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Angel HARO-PEREZ, a.k.a. UM-23, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before PRYOR, MARTIN and HILL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 376
Pages: 923–924

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Angel HARO-PEREZ, a.k.a. UM-23, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-14946
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
April 27, 2010.
Thomas C. Wooldridge, Wooldridge & Jezek, LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Elizabeth M. Hathaway, Jenny R. Turner, John Andrew Horn, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Before PRYOR, MARTIN and HILL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAMt:
Thomas C. Wooldridge, appointed appellate counsel for Angel Haro-Perez, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Haro-Perez's conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.