Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Alberto CASTRUITA-ESCOBEDO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-04-17
Citations: 685 F. App'x 341
Docket Number: No. 16-50436 Summary Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Alberto CASTRUITA-ESCOBEDO, Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 685
Pages: 341–342

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Alberto CASTRUITA-ESCOBEDO, Defendant-Appellant
No. 16-50436 Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed April 17, 2017
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Kristin L. Davidson, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Maureen Scott Franco, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant
Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Alberto Castruita-Escobedo was convicted of illegal reentry and was sentenced within the guidelines range to 41 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. He contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable and greater than necessary to satisfy the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. However, he fails to demonstrate any error with respect to the substantive reasonableness of his sentence. See United States v. Cooks, 589 F.3d 173, 186 (5th Cir. 2009); United States v. Campos-Maldonado, 531 F.3d 337, 338 (5th Cir. 2008).
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.