Case Name: Pamela SOKOL, Appellant, v. STARDANCER CASINO, INC., a Foreign corporation, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2003-10-08
Citations: 855 So. 2d 700
Docket Number: No. 3D02-2604
Parties: Pamela SOKOL, Appellant, v. STARDANCER CASINO, INC., a Foreign corporation, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and LEVY and GODERICH, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 855
Pages: 700–700

Head Matter:
Pamela SOKOL, Appellant, v. STARDANCER CASINO, INC., a Foreign corporation, Appellee.
No. 3D02-2604.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 8, 2003.
Roy D. Wasson, Miami; Robert M. Miller, Hollywood, for appellant.
McAlpin & Brais and Julie K. Rannik and James J. Feeney and Richard McAl-pin, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and LEVY and GODERICH, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute, 499 U.S. 585, 111 S.Ct. 1522, 113 L.Ed.2d 622 (1991); Effiron v. Sun Line Cruises, Inc., 67 F.3d 7 (2d Cir.1995); Spataro v. Kloster Cruise, Ltd., 894 F.2d 44 (2d Cir.1990); Hodes v. S.N.C. Achille Lauro ed Altri-Gestione, 858 F.2d 905 (3d Cir.1988), cert. dismissed, 490 U.S. 1001, 109 S.Ct. 1633, 104 L.Ed.2d 149 (1989); Marek v. Marpan Two, Inc., 817 F.2d 242 (3d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 852, 108 S.Ct. 155, 98 L.Ed.2d 110 (1987); Shankles v. Costa Armatori, S.P.A., 722 F.2d 861 (1st Cir.1983); DeNicola v. Cunard Line Ltd., 642 F.2d 5 (1st Cir.1981); Norwegian Cruise Line, Ltd. v. Clark, 841 So.2d 547 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). Compare Eick v. Norwegian Caribbean Lines A/S, 560 So.2d 1221 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Hirsch v. Klosters Rederi A/S, 521 So.2d 316 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).