Case Name: Rommell Media GAZQUEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1998-01-21
Citations: 704 So. 2d 219
Docket Number: No. 97-1041
Parties: Rommell Media GAZQUEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GODERICH and SORONDO, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 704
Pages: 219–219

Head Matter:
Rommell Media GAZQUEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 97-1041.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan. 21, 1998.
Paul Morris, Coral Gables, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Sandra S. Jaggard, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GODERICH and SORONDO, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The defendant appeals from his convictions and sentences raising two issues. We affirm.
As to the first issue regarding allegedly improper comments made by the prosecutor during closing argument, we find that they were either not preserved for appellate review or not inappropriate, and as to the second issue argued by the defendant, regarding the introduction of collateral crime evidence, we find that any alleged error was also not properly preserved for appellate review. Castor v. State, 365 So.2d 701 (Fla.1978). Accordingly, we affirm.
Affirmed.