Case Name: Gurad Pershad, Respondent, v. Parkchester South Condominium, Appellant, and Department of Housing Preservation and Development of the City of New York, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1998-10-22
Citations: 178 Misc. 2d 788
Docket Number: 
Parties: Gurad Pershad, Respondent, v Parkchester South Condominium, Appellant, and Department of Housing Preservation and Development of the City of New York, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 178
Pages: 788–789

Head Matter:
[683 NYS2d 708]
Gurad Pershad, Respondent, v Parkchester South Condominium, Appellant, and Department of Housing Preservation and Development of the City of New York, Respondent.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
October 22, 1998
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Novick, Edelstein, Lubell, Reisman, Wasserman, & Leventhal, P. C., Yonkers (Lawrence Schiro of counsel), for appellant. Michael D. Hess, Corporation Counsel (Leonard Koerner and Ronald E. Sternberg of counsel), for Department of Housing Preservation & Development of City of New York, respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Per Curiam.
Order dated August 15, 1997 affirmed, with $10 costs, for the reasons stated in the decision of Anthony J. Fiorella, Jr., J., at the Civil Court (174 Misc 2d 92).
Parness, P. J., Freedman and Davis, JJ., concur.