Case Name: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Lawrence Andrew INGRAM, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2015-07-02
Citations: 170 So. 3d 727
Docket Number: No. SC14-564
Parties: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Lawrence Andrew INGRAM, Respondent.
Judges: LABARGA, C.J., and LEWIS, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 170
Pages: 727–730

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Lawrence Andrew INGRAM, Respondent.
No. SC14-564.
Supreme Court of Florida.
July 2, 2015.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Teresa Leigh Mussetto, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, FL; Wesley Harold Heidt, Bureau Chief, Criminal Appeals, and Kellie Anne Nielan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, FL, for Petitioner.
Steven L. Brannock and Tyler K. Pitch-ford of Brannock & Humphries, Tampa, FL, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
At issue in this case is Respondent convicted criminal defendant's public record request of a videotape of his minor victim. At oral argument, the State represented, for the first time, that the videotape does not exist, and Respondent indicated there is no known basis to contest the State's assertion of non-existence. Accordingly, because the case before this Court and previously before the Fifth District Court of Appeal is one that seeks an advisory opinion, the opinion by the Fifth District in Ingram v. State, 164 So.3d 676 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014), is hereby vacated, and this case is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.
LABARGA, C.J., and LEWIS, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur.
PARIENTE, J., concurs in result only with an opinion.
QUINCE, J., concurs in result.
CANADY, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with an opinion.