Case Name: Raymond M. AUSTIN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2016-01-14
Citations: 181 So. 3d 1187
Docket Number: No. SC14-2215
Parties: Raymond M. AUSTIN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 181
Pages: 1187–1188

Head Matter:
Raymond M. AUSTIN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. SC14-2215.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Jan. 14, 2016.
Christopher James Anderson, Neptune Beach, FL, for Petitioner.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, and Virginia Chester Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, FL, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the First District Court of Appeal in Austin v. State, 158 So.3d 648 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014), based on express and direct conflict with the decision of the Third District Court of Appeal in Lightsey v. State, 112 So.3d 616 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013). See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. After further consideration, we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss this review proceeding.
It is so ordered.
NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.
LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur.
PARIENTE, J., concurs with an opinion.