Case Name: KWAI FUN WONG; Wu-Wei Tien Tao Association, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. David BEEBE, a former Immigration and Naturalization Service (n.k.a. Department of Homeland Security) Official; United States of America, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-01-03
Citations: 704 F.3d 816
Docket Number: No. 10-36136
Parties: KWAI FUN WONG; Wu-Wei Tien Tao Association, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. David BEEBE, a former Immigration and Naturalization Service (n.k.a. Department of Homeland Security) Official; United States of America, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 704
Pages: 816–816

Head Matter:
KWAI FUN WONG; Wu-Wei Tien Tao Association, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. David BEEBE, a former Immigration and Naturalization Service (n.k.a. Department of Homeland Security) Official; United States of America, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 10-36136.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Jan. 3, 2013.
Beth Creighton, Creighton & Rose, PC, Portland, OR, Thomas Martin Steenson, Tom Steenson, Portland, OR, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
James G. Bartolotto, Esquire, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Anne Murphy, Trial, Zachary Carl Richter, Trial, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, R. Joseph Sher, Assistant U.S., United States Attorney, Alexandria, YA, Barbara L. Herwig, Kelly A. Zusman, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Portland, OR, for Defendants-Appellees.
D.C. No. 3:01-cv-00718-JO.

Opinion:
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3.