Case Name: William Iselin & Co., Inc., Plaintiff, v. Muhlstock, Elowitz & Co., Defendant; Gold Miills, Inc., Appellant, v. George Muhlstock et al., Respondents; Futura Fabrics Corporation, Appellant, v. George Muhlstock et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1976-12-02
Citations: 40 N.Y.2d 989
Docket Number: 
Parties: William Iselin & Co., Inc., Plaintiff, v Muhlstock, Elowitz & Co., Defendant. Gold Miills, Inc., Appellant, v George Muhlstock et al., Respondents. Futura Fabrics Corporation, Appellant, v George Muhlstock et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 40
Pages: 989–989

Head Matter:
William Iselin & Co., Inc., Plaintiff, v Muhlstock, Elowitz & Co., Defendant. Gold Miills, Inc., Appellant, v George Muhlstock et al., Respondents. Futura Fabrics Corporation, Appellant, v George Muhlstock et al., Respondents.
Submitted November 1,1976;
decided December 2, 1976

Opinion:
Motion to dismiss the appeal taken by appellants Gold Mills, Inc., and Futura Fabrics Corporation granted and the appeal dismissed, with costs and $20 costs of motion, upon the ground that the dissent at the Appellate Division was not on a question of law reviewable by the Court of Appeals (CPLR 5601, subd [a], par [i]).