Case Name: Leland LACHANCE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2010-08-31
Citations: 318 S.W.3d 788
Docket Number: No. ED 93451
Parties: Leland LACHANCE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 318
Pages: 788–789

Head Matter:
Leland LACHANCE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 93451.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Aug. 31, 2010.
Gwenda R. Robinson, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, John W. Grant-ham, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Leland LaChance appeals from the motion court's denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 24.035. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2009, unless otherwise indicated.