Case Name: Tom Young and Si Cruze, Plaintiffs in Error, v. The State of Florida, Defendant in Error
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1924-07-30
Citations: 88 Fla. 165
Docket Number: 
Parties: Tom Young and Si Cruze, Plaintiffs in Error, v. The State of Florida, Defendant in Error.
Judges: Taylor, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, West and Terrell, J. J., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 88
Pages: 165–165

Head Matter:
Tom Young and Si Cruze, Plaintiffs in Error, v. The State of Florida, Defendant in Error.
En Banc.
Decision Filed July 30, 1924.
Petition for Rehearing Denied October 9, 1924.
A Writ of Error to the Criminal Court of Record for Orange County, T. Picton War low, Judge.
Alexander Aherman and 17. A. Pattishall, for Plaintiffs in Error;
Rivers Buford, Attorney General, and Marvin C. McIntosh, Assistant, for the State.

Opinion:
Per. Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective pai-ties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Taylor, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, West and Terrell, J. J., concur.
Browne, J., Dissents.