Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Florencio RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-06-19
Citations: 38 F. App'x 471
Docket Number: No. 01-30338; D.C. No. CR-01-00304-P
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Florencio RODRIGUEZ, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 38
Pages: 471–471

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Florencio RODRIGUEZ, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 01-30338.
D.C. No. CR-01-00304-P.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 10, 2002.
Decided June 19, 2002.
Before RYMER, T.G. NELSON and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Florencio Rodriguez appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to unlawful reentry by eluding the Immigration and Naturalization Service in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(2).
Rodriguez's attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and has moved to withdraw as counsel of record. Rodriguez did not file a pro se supplemental brief. Because our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), reveals no arguable issues, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw, and affirm the sentence.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.