Case Name: PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD CO., PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THEOPHILUS PAGE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1879-03
Citations: 41 N.J.L. 183
Docket Number: 
Parties: PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD CO., PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THEOPHILUS PAGE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
Judges: For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Dalrimple, Depue, Dixon, Knapp, Reed, Scudder, "Woodhull, Clement, Dodd, Green, Lathrop, "Wales — 14.
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 41
Pages: 183–184

Head Matter:
PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD CO., PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THEOPHILUS PAGE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
On error, a point not embraced in any exception taken below cannot be considered or decided.
On error to the Supreme Court.
For the plaintiff in error, Stone & Jackson.
For the defendant in error, Shafer & JDwand.

Opinion:
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Beasley, Chief Justice.
Judging from the brief of the counsel of the plaintiff in error, there appears to have been certain facts that were present on the trial of this case, which gave rise to a question of some interest and nicety in regard to the responsibilities of railroad companies for the negligence of the agents of the general government in the carriage of the mail. But, unfortunately, there was no exception taken that embraces the point, and it is impossible for this court either to consider or decide it. The motion to non-suit was rightly refused as the facts then stood, and the consequence is that the judgment should be affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Dalrimple, Depue, Dixon, Knapp, Reed, Scudder, "Woodhull, Clement, Dodd, Green, Lathrop, "Wales — 14.
For reversal — None.