Case Name: Claude CANNON, Petitioner, v. James McDONOUGH, Secretary of Florida Department of Corrections and The State of Florida, Respondents
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2007-06-27
Citations: 959 So. 2d 432
Docket Number: No. 3D07-1222
Parties: Claude CANNON, Petitioner, v. James McDONOUGH, Secretary of Florida Department of Corrections and The State of Florida, Respondents.
Judges: Before FLETCHER, WELLS, and SUAREZ, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 959
Pages: 432–433

Head Matter:
Claude CANNON, Petitioner, v. James McDONOUGH, Secretary of Florida Department of Corrections and The State of Florida, Respondents.
No. 3D07-1222.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
June 27, 2007.
Claude Cannon, in proper person.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Michael C. Greenberg, Assistant Attorney General, for respondents.
Before FLETCHER, WELLS, and SUAREZ, JJ.

Opinion:
SUAREZ, J.
Defendant, Claude Cannon, appeals the trial court's summary denial of a petition for writ of habeas corpus.
On May 16, 2007, this court denied defendant's petition for writ of habeas corpus as to gain time. In that order, this court requested the State respond to the remaining issue raised in the petition of whether or not the defendant received the proper credit for time served on re-sentencing. The State responded.
Upon review, we find that the trial court's summary denial is devoid of any record attachment which would enable this court to determine the validity of the defendant's claim that he did not receive proper credit for time served on re-sentencing. Specifically, there is no transcript of the violation of probation hearing and the sentencing documents only tell this court that the defendant gets jail credit "from 5/25/06 per court." If what the defendant alleges in his petition for writ of habeas corpus on this issue is true, he may be entitled to more credit for time served and may be nearing the completion of his sentence. Therefore, we reverse the trial court solely on this issue, appoint the public defender's office to assist the defendant in pursuing this claim in the trial court, and order the trial court to expedite review of this issue in light of our decision.
Reversed, appoint public defender, and remand for an expedited review.