Case Name: Mullins v. Cook and Webb
Court: Kentucky Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Kentucky
Decision Date: 1925-02-13
Citations: 207 Ky. 282
Docket Number: 
Parties: Mullins v. Cook and Webb.
Judges: 
Reporter: Kentucky Reports
Volume: 207
Pages: 282–282

Head Matter:
Mullins v. Cook and Webb.
(Decided February 13, 1925.)
Appeal from Shelby Circuit Court.
Appeal and Error — Separate Recoveries Cannot bo Consolidated to Give Court of Appeals Jurisdiction.- — -Where there were two separate and distinct recoveries against defendant, though both were awarded -in same judgment, they cannot be added to each . other to make an aggregate sum sufficient to give Court of Appeals jurisdiction.
WILDIS & WILLIS for appellant.
PICKETT, BARRICKMAN & KALTENBACKER for appellees.

Opinion:
Opinion of the Court by
Drury, Commissioner—
Dismissing.
The appellant has made a motion for an appeal from a judgment by which W. T. Cook recovered of appellant $164.30, and Leslie Webb recovered of appellant $146.30. These recoveries are separate and distinct, though both were -awarded in the same judgment, and they cannot be added to each other for the purpose of making -an aggregate sum sufficient to give this court jurisdiction. Covington Bros. v. Jordan, 125 Ky. 73, 100 S. W. 326, 30 Ky. L. R. 1135, 15 Anns Cas. 491; Wood v. Moss, et al., 176 Ky. 419, 195 S. W. 1077; Smith v. Berry, 167 Ky. 646, 181 S. W. 379.
Hence, appellant's motion for an appeal must be overruled for want of jurisdiction.