Case Name: Lawrence Verline WILDER, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, and Equifax Credit Information Services, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-07-25
Citations: 667 F. App'x 399
Docket Number: No. 16-1267
Parties: Lawrence Verline WILDER, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, and Equifax Credit Information Services, Defendant.
Judges: Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 667
Pages: 399–399

Head Matter:
Lawrence Verline WILDER, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, and Equifax Credit Information Services, Defendant.
No. 16-1267
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 21, 2016
Decided: July 25, 2016
Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Michael N. Russo, Jr., COUNCIL, BARADEL, KOSMERL & NOLAN, PA, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., appeals the district court's order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Aikens v. Ingram, 652 F.3d 496, 501 (4th Cir. 2011) (providing standard). Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm. Wilder's motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED