Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Quincy HALE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-08-18
Citations: 612 F. App'x 796
Docket Number: No. 14-10135
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Quincy HALE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before JOLLY, GRAVES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 612
Pages: 796–797

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Quincy HALE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 14-10135
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 18, 2015.
James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Dallas, TX, James Michael Worley, Sr., Esq., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Fort Worth, TX, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee.
Donald Robin McCarty, Law Office of Robin McCarty, Fort Worth, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Quincy Hale, Fort Worth, TX, pro se.
Before JOLLY, GRAVES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAMí
The attorney appointed to represent Quincy Hale has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Hale has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.