Case Name: Belay REDDICK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mary M. MITCHELL; Joseph Neal; R. Kelso; S. Lathrop, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-12-23
Citations: 460 F. App'x 214
Docket Number: No. 11-7043
Parties: Belay REDDICK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mary M. MITCHELL; Joseph Neal; R. Kelso; S. Lathrop, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 460
Pages: 214–214

Head Matter:
Belay REDDICK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mary M. MITCHELL; Joseph Neal; R. Kelso; S. Lathrop, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 11-7043.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 20, 2011.
Decided: Dec. 23, 2011.
Belay Reddick, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Belay Reddick appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Reddick v. Mitchell, No. 2:10-cv-02487-DCN, 2011 WL 2970803 (D.S.C. July 20, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.