Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Willie Freno PRICE, Defendant-Appellant; United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Willie Freno Price, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-06-26
Citations: 282 F. App'x 277
Docket Number: Nos. 08-6018, 08-6539
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Willie Freno PRICE, Defendant—Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Willie Freno Price, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 282
Pages: 277–278

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Willie Freno PRICE, Defendant—Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Willie Freno Price, Defendant—Appellant.
Nos. 08-6018, 08-6539.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 6, 2008.
Decided: June 26, 2008.
Willie Freno Price, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Andrew Bassford, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Willie Freno Price appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his motion for a reduction of sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we find the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir.2004) (motion under § 3582(c) "is subject to the discretion of the district court"). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.