Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. RONALD ANTHONY HICKS, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1977-08-22
Citations: 30 Or. App. 773
Docket Number: No. C 75-10-3119 Cr, (DA 114411), CA 7585
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. RONALD ANTHONY HICKS, Appellant.
Judges: Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Lee and Johnson, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 30
Pages: 773–775

Head Matter:
Argued July 27,
affirmed August 22,
reconsideration denied September 27,
petition for review denied December 20, 1977
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. RONALD ANTHONY HICKS, Appellant.
(No. C 75-10-3119 Cr, (DA 114411), CA 7585)
567 P2d 624
Larry N. Sokol, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were John L. Klor and Franklin, Bennett, Ofelt & Jolles, P.C., Portland.
Betty Smith, Certified Law Student, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were James A. Redden, Attorney General, W. Michael Gillette, Solicitor General, and John W. Burgess, Assistant Attorney General, Salem.
Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Lee and Johnson, Judges.
PER CURIAM.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The trial court properly denied appellant's motion to suppress, Chambers v. Moroney, 399 US 42, 26 L Ed 2d 419, 90 S Ct 1975 (1970), and State v. Pennington, 28 Or App 331, 559 P2d 915, Sup Ct review denied (1977), and for a new trial, State v. Hancock, 247 Or 21, 426 P2d 872 (1967), and State v. Arndt, 1 Or App 608, 465 P2d 486 (1970).
Affirmed.