Case Name: ARROW BEEF CORP., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Howard DUTKIN, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1966-03-15
Citations: 183 So. 2d 862
Docket Number: No. 65-594
Parties: ARROW BEEF CORP., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Howard DUTKIN, Appellee.
Judges: Before HENDRY, C. J, and TILLMAN PEARSON and SWANN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 183
Pages: 862–863

Head Matter:
ARROW BEEF CORP., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Howard DUTKIN, Appellee.
No. 65-594.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
March 15, 1966.
Weinstein & Weissenborn, Miami, for appellant.
Norman H. Goldstein, North Miami Beach, for appellee.
Before HENDRY, C. J, and TILLMAN PEARSON and SWANN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This appeal from a judgment which was entered upon a directed verdict is affirmed because the evidence was such that no view which the jury could have lawfully taken of it favorable to the party moved against could have been sustained under the law. Jones v. Royal Palm Ice Company, Fla.App.1962, 145 So.2d 887.