Case Name: SUSAN LAFFOON v. LAMONT ALONZO LAFFOON
Court: Supreme Court of the Territory of Hawaii
Jurisdiction: Hawaii
Decision Date: 1945-06-28
Citations: 37 Haw. 107
Docket Number: No. 2601
Parties: SUSAN LAFFOON v. LAMONT ALONZO LAFFOON.
Judges: 
Reporter: Hawaii Reports
Volume: 37
Pages: 107–109

Head Matter:
SUSAN LAFFOON v. LAMONT ALONZO LAFFOON.
No. 2601
Argued June 20, 1945.
Decided June 28, 1945.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
In the circuit court the plaintiff recovered a judgment against the defendant as follmvs:
"IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Plaintiff, SUSAN LAFFOON, do have and recover from the Defendant, LAMONT ALONZO LAFFOON, the following items of personal property: (Here follows a list of the items with the value of each item set opposite.)
"AND IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that if delivery of any of the said items of property cannot be made, then plaintiff do have and recover from defendant the value thereof, as herein set forth."
To reverse this judgment the defendant sued out a writ of error in this court but did not file with the cleric a bond "conditioned for the payment of the judgment in the origi nal canse in case of failure to sustain the writ of error." R. L. H. 1945, § 9557.
For the failure of the defendant-plaintiff in error to file such a bond, the plaintiff-defendant in error has moved that the writ of error be dismissed.
Section 9557, supra, provides inter alia, that, "No writ of error shall issue except in criminal cases and cases in which there is no money judgment," until a bond such as the one above described has been filed.
If the judgment above quoted is a "money judgment," the writ was improvidently issued and must be dismissed.
The form of judgment for plaintiff in replevin adopted by this court in 1893 provided for the recovery of the property "or $- in case a delivery thereof cannot be had." 9 Haw. 725.
The judgment in this case, though not in the exact words of the form adopted by this court, is nevertheless of the same legal effect. They are both judgments in the alternative.
In 46 American Jurisprudence, Replevin, section 136, page 73, the method of enforcing such a judgment is discussed as follows: "Since the judgment in replevin generally is in the alternative, it may be satisfied in one of two ways, namely, by a return of the property or by the payment of the money value thereof, in the event the property cannot be returned. An execution must follow the judgment, and there is but one form of execution on a judgment in an action of replevin; it is satisfied, so far as the subject matter of the litigation is concerned, by a delivery to the officer of the property described in the writ, If, under such an execution, the officer is unable to obtain possession of the property described therein, he may proceed under the same execution to enforce the alternative judgment, and his return is conclusive between the parties, and not subject to collateral attack."
A. K. Trask for the motion.
O. P. Soares contra.
Such an execution could not be levied on other property of the defendant if the judgment was not a money judgment. It follows that the judgment is a money judgment.
The writ of error is therefore dismissed.