Case Name: In the Matter of the Compensation of Roy E. Hubbard, Claimant. ROSEBURG FOREST PRODUCTS, Petitioner, v. Roy E. HUBBARD, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1991-06-19
Citations: 107 Or. App. 778
Docket Number: 88-10506; CA A64700
Parties: In the Matter of the Compensation of Roy E. Hubbard, Claimant. ROSEBURG FOREST PRODUCTS, Petitioner, v. Roy E. HUBBARD, Respondent.
Judges: Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Rossman and De Muniz, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 107
Pages: 778–778

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted December 10, 1990,
reversed and remanded for reconsideration June 19, 1991
In the Matter of the Compensation of Roy E. Hubbard, Claimant. ROSEBURG FOREST PRODUCTS, Petitioner, v. Roy E. HUBBARD, Respondent.
(88-10506; CA A64700)
812 P2d 855
Thomas M. Sheridan, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Davis & Bostwick, Portland.
Malcolm J. Corrigall, Coos Bay, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Ormsbee & Corrigall, Coos Bay.
Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Rossman and De Muniz, Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Reversed and remanded for reconsideration in the light of Aetna Casualty Co. v. Aschbacher, 107 Or App 494, 812 P2d 844 (1991), and Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp. v. Damm, 107 Or App 764, 812 P2d 854 (1991).