Case Name: Brian D. WHITE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2013-05-14
Citations: 436 S.W.3d 239
Docket Number: No. ED 98636
Parties: Brian D. WHITE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., PATRICIA L. COHEN, J., and KURT S. ODENWALD, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 436
Pages: 239–239

Head Matter:
Brian D. WHITE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 98636.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
May 14, 2013.
Lisa M. Stroup, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Dora A. Fichter, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., PATRICIA L. COHEN, J., and KURT S. ODENWALD, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Brian White (Movant) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying without an evidentiary hearing his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant claims the motion court clearly erred in denying his claims that plea counsel provided ineffective assistance by: (1) advising Movant that, if he pleaded guilty, the motion court would sentence him to no longer than seventeen years' imprisonment; and (2) failing to advocate for a more favorable sentencing disposition.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court's decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).