Case Name: Lennie R. SENTER, Plaintiff-Appellant v. STERICYCLE, INC., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-07-11
Citations: 564 F. App'x 273
Docket Number: No. 13-3511
Parties: Lennie R. SENTER, Plaintiff-Appellant v. STERICYCLE, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before BYE, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 564
Pages: 273–274

Head Matter:
Lennie R. SENTER, Plaintiff-Appellant v. STERICYCLE, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 13-3511.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: July 7, 2014.
Filed: July 11, 2014.
Lennie R. Senter, Urbandale, IA, pro se.
Steven Hamann, Cara J. Ottenweller, Vedder & Price, Chicago, IL, Jonathan Paul Norrie, Bassford & Remele, Minneapolis, MN, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before BYE, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Lennie R. Senter appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment in his Title VII action against his former employer, Stericycle, Inc. (Stericy-cle). Upon de novo review, we agree with the district court that Stericycle met its burden of showing that there were no gen uine issues of material fact, and that it was entitled to judgment as a matter of law on Senter's claims that he was subjected to racial harassment and discrimination, and that he suffered retaliation in violation of Title VIL See Whisenhunt v. Sw. Bell Tel., 573 F.3d 565, 568 (8th Cir.2009). The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.