Case Name: CITY OF ARNOLD, Pennsylvania, Respondent v. WAGE POLICY COMMITTEE OF the CITY OF ARNOLD POLICE DEPARTMENT, o/b/o Pamela Cimino, Petitioners
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2016-10-26
Citations: 160 A.3d 764
Docket Number: No. 238 WAL 2016
Parties: CITY OF ARNOLD, Pennsylvania, Respondent v. WAGE POLICY COMMITTEE OF the CITY OF ARNOLD POLICE DEPARTMENT, o/b/o Pamela Cimino, Petitioners
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 160
Pages: 764–764

Head Matter:
CITY OF ARNOLD, Pennsylvania, Respondent v. WAGE POLICY COMMITTEE OF the CITY OF ARNOLD POLICE DEPARTMENT, o/b/o Pamela Cimino, Petitioners
No. 238 WAL 2016
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
October 26, 2016

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 26th day of October, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:
Is a dispute between a union and a municipality arising out of a surviving spouse's pension benefit arbitrable under the Collective Bargaining by Policemen or Firemen Act, 43 P.S. § 217.1-217.10, where the benefit was afforded to the surviving spouse of a police officer or firefighter statutorily, and incorporated into the parties collective bargaining agreement?