Case Name: SECURITY-FIRST NAT. BANK OF LOS ANGELES v. KING, ET AL.
Court: Supreme Court of Wyoming
Jurisdiction: Wyoming
Decision Date: 1932-11-21
Citations: 45 Wyo. 93
Docket Number: No. 1774
Parties: SECURITY-FIRST NAT. BANK OF LOS ANGELES v. KING, ET AL.
Judges: 
Reporter: Wyoming Reports
Volume: 45
Pages: 93–96

Head Matter:
SECURITY-FIRST NAT. BANK OF LOS ANGELES v. KING, ET AL.
(No. 1774;
Nov. 21, 1932;
15 Pac. (2d) 1112)
There was a brief by Donald Spiker, of Riverton, Wyoming, A. H. Maxwell, of Lander, Wyoming, and Bryant 8. Cromer, of Casper, Wyoming, and oral argument by Mr. Cromer and by Mr. Maxwell in support of the motion.
Opposing the motion there was a brief by G. J. Christie, F. A. Michels and Lucius F. Chase, of Lander, Wyoming, and oral argument by Messrs. Christie, Michels and Chase.

Opinion:
Ter Curiam.
The case has been heard on motion to dismiss filed by defendants in error. The principal ground of the motion raises questions that evidently were decided against plaintiff in error by the order of the District Court which we are asked to review. The decision of those questions here requires a consideration of the merits of the proceeding in error.
We have heretofore held that we should not assume ordinarily to decide the merits of a case on a motion to dismiss. Enos v. Keating, 36 Wyo. 318, 255 Pac. 1. The motion will be denied with the understanding that points thereby raised may receive further consideration when the case is heard on the merits.
Motion denied.