Case Name: Nicholas NETTLES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2018-10-09
Citations: 558 S.W.3d 603
Docket Number: No. ED 105894
Parties: Nicholas NETTLES, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J. and Mary K. Hoff, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 558
Pages: 603–604

Head Matter:
Nicholas NETTLES, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 105894
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Filed: October 9, 2018
FOR APPELLANT: Kevin L. Schriener, Law & Schriener, LLC, 141 North Meramec Avenue, Suite 314, Clayton, Missouri 63105.
FOR RESPONDENT: Julia E. Neidhardt, Assistant Attorney General, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.
Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J. and Mary K. Hoff, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Nicholas Nettles ("Movant") appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Movant's sole point on appeal is his trial counsel was ineffective for advising him to admit to the prior uncharged bad act of striking J.J. and counsel conceding in his opening statement that Movant struck J.J. Finding no clear error, we affirm. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order under to Rule 84.16.