Case Name: Roberto Soto et al., Respondents, v. Ahmed Koysor et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2008-04-24
Citations: 50 A.D.3d 503
Docket Number: 
Parties: Roberto Soto et al., Respondents, v Ahmed Koysor et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 50
Pages: 503–503

Head Matter:
Roberto Soto et al., Respondents, v Ahmed Koysor et al., Appellants.
[854 NYS2d 892]

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (George D. Salerno, J.), entered March 19, 2007, which denied defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in defendants' favor dismissing the complaint.
Plaintiffs provided no explanation for terminating their medical treatment several months after the accident in which they claim to have sustained "serious injury" (Insurance Law § 5102 [d]; see Pommells v Perez, 4 NY3d 566, 574-575 [2005]). Concur—Lippman, EJ., Friedman, Sweeny and Moskowitz, JJ.