Case Name: Ralph E. SUNDERLAND, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error; Willard V. MATTHEWS, Plaintiff in Error, v. SAME, Defendant in Error; Thomas H. MATTERS, Plaintiff in Error, v. SAME, Defendant in Error
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1923-12-10
Citations: 294 F. 811
Docket Number: 
Parties: Ralph E. SUNDERLAND, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error. Willard V. MATTHEWS, Plaintiff in Error, v. SAME, Defendant in Error. Thomas H. MATTERS, Plaintiff in Error, v. SAME, Defendant in Error.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter
Volume: 294
Pages: 811–811

Head Matter:
Ralph E. SUNDERLAND, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error. Willard V. MATTHEWS, Plaintiff in Error, v. SAME, Defendant in Error. Thomas H. MATTERS, Plaintiff in Error, v. SAME, Defendant in Error.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
December 10, 1923.)
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The plaintiffs in error in the cases above entitled, who were codefendants below with the plaintiff in error in Stickel v. United States 294 Fed. 808, made applications on like facts for like orders for an extension of time to prepare, serve, and settle the bill of exceptions and for an enlargement of the time to file the record to those sought in Stickel v. United States. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, let orders of the same character as those there directed be made in these cases.'