Case Name: Columbus Bar Association v. Herzberger
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1991-03-27
Citations: 58 Ohio St. 3d 175
Docket Number: No. 90-2151
Parties: Columbus Bar Association v. Herzberger.
Judges: Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, H. Brown and Re snick, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 58
Pages: 175–177

Head Matter:
Columbus Bar Association v. Herzberger.
[Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Herzberger (1991), 58 Ohio St. 3d 175.]
(No. 90-2151
Submitted December 12, 1990
Decided March 27, 1991.)
William D. Kloss, Marya Kolman, William B. Skimp, Jr. and Bruce A. Campbell, for relator.
Charles W. Kettlewell, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we agree with the board's findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Respondent is, therefore, suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for one year, but this sanction is suspended on the condition that he successfully complete a two-year monitored probation period. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, H. Brown and Re snick, JJ., concur.
Moyer, C.J., and Wright, J., dissent and would suspend respondent from the practice of law for one year, with six months of that period suspended, pending his successful completion of a two-year monitored probation period.