Case Name: Carl W. MAY, Petitioner, v. SOUTH NAPLES SHORES, Seagate, Inc., and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1966-03-30
Citations: 184 So. 2d 645
Docket Number: No. 34136
Parties: Carl W. MAY, Petitioner, v. SOUTH NAPLES SHORES, Seagate, Inc., and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
Judges: THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 184
Pages: 645–646

Head Matter:
Carl W. MAY, Petitioner, v. SOUTH NAPLES SHORES, Seagate, Inc., and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
No. 34136.
Supreme Court of Florida.
March 30, 1966.
Ralph P. Ezzo and Highsmith & Ezzo, Miami, for petitioner.
Roberts, Watson, Taylor & Friday, Fort Meyers, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date January 4, 1965.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.
The petition for attorney's fees also is denied.
THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, O'CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.