Case Name: Judith M. McKELVEY, Appellant, v. Andrew J. McKELVEY, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-12-11
Citations: 570 So. 2d 1127
Docket Number: No. 89-234
Parties: Judith M. McKELVEY, Appellant, v. Andrew J. McKELVEY, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and COPE, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 570
Pages: 1127–1128

Head Matter:
Judith M. McKELVEY, Appellant, v. Andrew J. McKELVEY, Appellee.
No. 89-234.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 11, 1990.
Greene and Marks and Cynthia Greene, Melvyn B. Frumkes, Miami, for appellant.
Sinclair, Louis, Siegel, Heath, Nussbaum & Zavertnik and John Zavertnik, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and COPE, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
There is ample, although disputed, evidence which supports the trial judge's action in upholding the validity of the parties' antenuptial agreement, see Casto v. Casto, 508 So.2d 330 (Fla.1987); Del Vecchio v. Del Vecchio, 143 So.2d 17 (Fla.1962); Bubenik v. Bubenik, 392 So.2d 943 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), as well as the other determinations challenged on this appeal. We are therefore bound to uphold the final judgment entered below in all respects. Marsh v. Marsh, 419 So.2d 629, 630 (Fla.1982); Strawgate v. Turner, 339 So.2d 1112, 1113 (Fla.1976); Chakford v. Strum, 87 So.2d 419, 420 (Fla.1956).
Affirmed.