Case Name: Helen Harris, Respondent, v. Pathmark Supermarket, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1994-02-07
Citations: 201 A.D.2d 457
Docket Number: 
Parties: Helen Harris, Respondent, v Pathmark Supermarket, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 201
Pages: 457–457

Head Matter:
Helen Harris, Respondent, v Pathmark Supermarket, Appellant.
[609 NYS2d 800]

Opinion:
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Zelman, J.), dated October 25, 1991, which granted the plaintiff's motion to strike the defendant's 90-day demand pursuant to CPLR 3216 and denied the defendant's cross motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to prosecute.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the facts, with costs, the motion is denied, the cross motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.
The plaintiff failed to demonstrate a justifiable excuse for the delay in responding to the 90-day demand pursuant to CPLR 3216 (see, Turman v Amity OBG Assocs., 170 AD2d 668). Thompson, J. P., Rosenblatt, Ritter, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.