Case Name: Maggie Harjo v. W. A. Kunkle et al.
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1921-01-24
Citations: 254 U.S. 620
Docket Number: No. 160
Parties: Maggie Harjo v. W. A. Kunkle et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 254
Pages: 620–620

Head Matter:
No. 160.
Maggie Harjo v. W. A. Kunkle et al.

Opinion:
Appeal from, the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Argued January 20, 1921. Decided January 24, 1921. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon authority of Farrell v. O'Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225, 232; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580, 583; United Surety Co. v. American Fruit Co., 238 U. S. 140, 142; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182, 184; Berkman v. United States, 250 U. S. 114, 118; Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Graham, 253 U. S. 193. Mr. Lewis C. Lawson for appellant. Mr. Preston C. West and Mr. A. A. Davidson, for appellees, submitted.