Case Name: Nathaniel WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2004-02-11
Citations: 865 So. 2d 637
Docket Number: No. 3D02-11
Parties: Nathaniel WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before LEVY, GREEN, and RAMIREZ, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 865
Pages: 637–638

Head Matter:
Nathaniel WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D02-11.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 11, 2004.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Robert Kalter, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Charlie Crist, Attorney General and Michael J. Neimand, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee.
Before LEVY, GREEN, and RAMIREZ, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This appeal recurs upon a mandate issued by the Supreme Court of Florida on December 11, 2003. We vacate the harmless error analysis portion of our previous opinion, recorded at 834 So.2d 923, and conform in all respects to the opinion of the Supreme Court recorded at 863 So.2d 1189 (Fla.2003). As directed by that opinion and mandate we now apply the principles announced in Goodwin v. State, 751 So.2d 537 (Fla.1999), and State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986), and reconsider this matter under the DiGuilio harmless error standard.
Accordingly, we hereby affirm the conviction and sentence under review finding that, although the trial court abused its discretion in not permitting the defense to elicit the fact that Hunt had been expelled from the police explorers, there was no reasonable possibility that this error affected the verdict. We therefore, affirm.