Case Name: C. Clark, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Florida, Defendant in Error
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1923-11-21
Citations: 86 Fla. 478
Docket Number: 
Parties: C. Clark, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Florida, Defendant in Error.
Judges: Whitfield, P. J., and West and Terrell, J'. J., concur.-
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 86
Pages: 478–478

Head Matter:
C. Clark, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Florida, Defendant in Error.
Decision Filed November 21, 1923.
This case was decided by Division B.
A Writ of Error to the Criminal Court of Record for Orange County; T. Picton Warlow, Judge.
Newell & Boyer, for Plaintiff in Error;
Bwers Buford, Attorney General, and J. B. Gaines, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The evidence as to the guilt of the accused is circumstantial, and is of such a nature that a new trial should be granted.
Reversed.
Whitfield, P. J., and West and Terrell, J'. J., concur.-