Case Name: JACKSON, Appellant, v. BULIFANT et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1901-06
Citations: 72 N.Y.S. 1108
Docket Number: 
Parties: JACKSON, Appellant, v. BULIFANT et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 72
Pages: 1108–1108

Head Matter:
JACKSON, Appellant, v. BULIFANT et al., Respondents.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
June, 1901.)
Action by Joseph L. Jackson against Joseph Bulifant and others.
Howard Ellis, for appellant. Vincent Rosemon, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
All of the sales, except those to Worth & Co. and Lewis Marks, were evidenced by written sales notes drawn by plaintiff himself. From these sales notes it appears that the so-called sales were conditional upon the buyer's approval of the goods. They did not approve them, and consequently no sale was effected. The plaintiff earned no commissions upon these transactions. As to the Worth and Marks items, the evidence was conflicting, and we see no reason to disturb the finding of the justice. Judgment affirmed, with costs.