Case Name: Frederick K. Keller, Respondent v. The Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company, et al., Appellants
Court: New York Superior Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1891-05-11
Citations: 27 Jones & S. 589
Docket Number: 
Parties: Frederick K. Keller, Respondent v. The Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company, et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Reports of cases argued and determined in the Superior Court of the city of New York
Volume: 59
Pages: 589–589

Head Matter:
Frederick K. Keller, Respondent v. The Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company, et al., Appellants.
Decided May 11, 1891.
Appeal by defendants from judgment entered upon findings and conclusions made at special term.
Edward B. Thomas, attorney and of counsel, for appellants.
Edwin M. Felt, attorney and of counsel, for respondent.
Before Sedgwick, Ch. J., Freedman and Ingraham, JJ.

Opinion:
The question involved was whether certain findings and conclusions were inconsistent. The Court (per Curiam) held, that' on a fair construction they were not, and affirmed the judgment, with costs.