Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael A. CLARK, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-02-26
Citations: 633 F. App'x 590
Docket Number: No. 15-7770
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael A. CLARK, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 633
Pages: 590–591

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael A. CLARK, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-7770.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 23, 2016.
Decided: Feb. 26, 2016.
Michael A. Clark, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Daniel Cooke, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael A. Clark appeals the district court's order denying his motions for re duction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Clark, No. 3:00-cr-00244-REP-1 (ED.Va. Oct. 28, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.