Case Name: JOSEPH SHACKLETON, Resp't, v. WAINWRIGHT MANUFACTURING COMPANY, App'lt
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1887-03-02
Citations: 7 N.Y. St. Rep. 872
Docket Number: 
Parties: JOSEPH SHACKLETON, Resp’t, v. WAINWRIGHT MANUFACTURING COMPANY, App’lt.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 7
Pages: 872–872

Head Matter:
JOSEPH SHACKLETON, Resp’t, v. WAINWRIGHT MANUFACTURING COMPANY, App’lt.
Service op summons on corporation, when good.
Appeal from order denying motion to set aside service of summons
A. D. Kenyon, for app’lt; F. Forbes, for resp’t.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The affidavits taken together did establish the fact_ that the corporation was engaged in business in this state and that its business was managed by and under the supervision of Aspinwall, which made him a managing agent within the third subdivision of section 432 of the Code, as that has. been construed and applied in Palmer v. Pennsylvania Company, 35 Hun, 369.
The order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.