Case Name: Ronald FINKELSTEIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-08-07
Citations: 582 So. 2d 1260
Docket Number: No. 90-2998
Parties: Ronald FINKELSTEIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: HERSEY, STONE and GARRETT, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 582
Pages: 1260–1261

Head Matter:
Ronald FINKELSTEIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 90-2998.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Aug. 7, 1991.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Joseph R. Chloupek, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Joseph A. Tringali, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The trial court's reasons for imposing a sentence which constituted an upward departure from the guidelines are not supported by facts in the record that are credible and proven by a preponderance of the evidence. Therefore, we reverse appellant's sentence and remand for resentenc-ing within the guidelines. § 921.001(5), Fla.Stat. (1989); Griffin v. State, 546 So.2d 91 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. denied, 553 So.2d 1165 (Fla.1989). See also Nelson v. State, 567 So.2d 548, 549 & n. 1 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). In all other respects, we affirm.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; REMANDED.
HERSEY, STONE and GARRETT, JJ., concur.