Case Name: RUDOLPH TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee v. CAMTEK, LTD., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-02-03
Citations: 632 F. App'x 620
Docket Number: No. 2015-1434
Parties: RUDOLPH TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee v. CAMTEK, LTD., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: MOORE, O’MALLEY, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 632
Pages: 620–620

Head Matter:
RUDOLPH TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee v. CAMTEK, LTD., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 2015-1434.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Feb. 3, 2016.
Daniel W. McDonald, Merchant & Gould P.C., Minneapolis, MN, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by Rachel C. Hughey, Michael A. Erbele.
Daniel Howard Bromberg, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Redwood Shores, CA, argued for defendant-appellant. Also represented by Claude M. Stern; David Leon Bilsker, San Francisco, CA.
MOORE, O’MALLEY, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.
This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:
AFFIRMED, See Fed. Cir. R. 36.