Case Name: Jennifer L. LASTER; Andrew Thompson; Elizabeth Voorhies, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and on behalf of the general public, Plaintiffs, and Vincent Concepcion; Liza Concepcion, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. AT & T Mobility LLC, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-11-21
Citations: 663 F.3d 1034
Docket Number: No. 08-56394
Parties: Jennifer L. LASTER; Andrew Thompson; Elizabeth Voorhies, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and on behalf of the general public, Plaintiffs, and Vincent Concepcion; Liza Concepcion, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. AT & T Mobility LLC, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: MARY M. SCHROEDER, STEPHEN REINHARDT, and CARLOS T. BEA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 663
Pages: 1034–1034

Head Matter:
Jennifer L. LASTER; Andrew Thompson; Elizabeth Voorhies, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and on behalf of the general public, Plaintiffs, and Vincent Concepcion; Liza Concepcion, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. AT & T Mobility LLC, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-56394.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Nov. 21, 2011.
Matthew B. Butler, Esquire, Craig Nicholas, Nicholas & Butler LLP, Kirk B. Hulett, Sarah P. Weber, Hulett Harper Stewart LLP, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiffs.
Donald Manwell Falk, Mayer Brown, LLP, Palo Alto, CA, Jesse M. Jauregui, Esquire, Alston & Bird LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Evan Mark Tager, Arehis Ashok Parasharami, Mayer Brown LLP, Washington, DC, Michele A. Powers, Esquire, Alston & Bird LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: MARY M. SCHROEDER, STEPHEN REINHARDT, and CARLOS T. BEA, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
The case is remanded to the district court for proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court's opinion in AT & T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, — U.S. —, 131 S.Ct. 1740, 179 L.Ed.2d 742 (2011).