Case Name: Frank Bucci et al., respondent, v. Stefon Popovich et al., appellant
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1922-02-09
Citations: 93 N.J. Eq. 511
Docket Number: 
Parties: Frank Bucci et al., respondent, v. Stefon Popovich et al., appellant.
Judges: For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayzb, Trbnchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk — 13.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 93
Pages: 511–511

Head Matter:
Frank Bucci et al., respondent, v. Stefon Popovich et al., appellant.
[Decided February 9th, 1922.]
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Fielder, whose opinion is reported in 93 N. J. Eq. 121.
Messrs. Burnett, Sorg, Murray & Duncan, for the respondents.
Mr. Gilbert M. Garnish, for the appellants.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fielder.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayzb, Trbnchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk — 13.
For reversal — None.