Case Name: Melton Dadjad BLACKMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1973-08-15
Citations: 282 So. 2d 34
Docket Number: No. 73-256
Parties: Melton Dadjad BLACKMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: MANN, C. J., and HOBSON and BOARDMAN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 282
Pages: 34–34

Head Matter:
Melton Dadjad BLACKMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 73-256.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Aug. 15, 1973.
James A. Gardner, Public Defender, Bradenton, and Thomas A. Capelle, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corees, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We feel that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is, therefore, dispensed with pursuant to Rule 3.10(e), F. A.R., 32 F.S.A.
Affirmed.
MANN, C. J., and HOBSON and BOARDMAN, JJ., concur.