Case Name: Edward BOWIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HENDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT; John Doe; Jane Doe, Defendants-Appellees; Edward Bowie, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Henderson Police Department; John Doe; Jane Doe, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-05-28
Citations: 520 F. App'x 241
Docket Number: Nos. 12-2448, 13-1131
Parties: Edward BOWIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HENDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT; John Doe; Jane Doe, Defendants-Appellees. Edward Bowie, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Henderson Police Department; John Doe; Jane Doe, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 520
Pages: 241–241

Head Matter:
Edward BOWIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HENDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT; John Doe; Jane Doe, Defendants-Appellees. Edward Bowie, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Henderson Police Department; John Doe; Jane Doe, Defendants-Appellees.
Nos. 12-2448, 13-1131.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 23, 2013.
Decided: May 28, 2013.
Edward Bowie, Appellant Pro Se. Kari Russwurm Johnson, Cranfill, Sumner & Hartzog, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Edward Bowie appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bowie v. Henderson Police Dept., No. 5:12-cv-00514-FL, 2012 WL 5392116 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 5, 2012 & Jan. 9, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.