Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Tiray M. Paige, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2011-03-29
Citations: 16 N.Y.3d 816
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tiray M. Paige, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 16
Pages: 816–817

Head Matter:
[945 NE2d 1028, 920 NYS2d 777]
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tiray M. Paige, Appellant.
Decided March 29, 2011
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Gregory D. LaDuke, Lake Placid, for appellant.
Derek P. Champagne, District Attorney, Malone (Glenn MacNeill of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Whether an officer had a reasonable belief that the subject of the arrest warrant was in the home so as to demand entry into the residence is a mixed question of law and fact, which, if supported by record evidence, is beyond further review by this Court (see generally People v Francois, 14 NY3d 732 [2010]). We conclude that record evidence exists to support the determinations of the courts below.
Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed in a memorandum.