Case Name: IN RE APPLICATION OF OHIO POWER CO.
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2018-04-17
Citations: 95 N.E.3d 418
Docket Number: 2017–0749
Parties: IN RE APPLICATION OF OHIO POWER CO.
Judges: 
Reporter: North Eastern Reporter 3d
Volume: 95
Pages: 418–418

Head Matter:
IN RE APPLICATION OF OHIO POWER CO.
2017-0749
Supreme Court of Ohio.
April 17, 2018
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS
MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

Opinion:
Sua sponte, appellants shall show cause within seven days why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of prejudice stemming from the order on appeal. In their responses, appellants shall address (1) whether the ratepayers represented by appellants have suffered concrete harm stemming from the commission's order on appeal, (2) in light of the fact that the order on appeal did not authorize any cost recovery through the power-purchase-agreement rider, what relief is available to appellants should the court find the commission erred in authorizing the rider, and (3) whether appellants can fully litigate their claims against the power-purchase-agreement rider in case No. 2017-0752.
Appellee and intervening appellee may file responses within seven days of the filing of the appellants' responses. No extensions of time shall be permitted. The clerk shall refuse to file any requests for extension of time.
Kennedy, J., dissents and would consolidate this cause with 2017-0752, In re Application of Ohio Power Co., for briefing and oral argument.