Case Name: HERBERT M. BURNS v. NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY COMPANY
Court: Minnesota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Minnesota
Decision Date: 1939-01-27
Citations: 204 Minn. 348
Docket Number: No. 31,882
Parties: HERBERT M. BURNS v. NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY COMPANY.
Judges: 
Reporter: Minnesota Reports
Volume: 204
Pages: 348–349

Head Matter:
HERBERT M. BURNS v. NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY COMPANY.
January 27, 1939.
No. 31,882.
$. W. Jensch, for appellant.
Fowler, Youngquist, Furber, Taney & Johnson and Edward A. Danforth, for respondent.
Reported in 283 N. W. 750.

Opinion:
Pee Curiam.
This action to recover for default of an administrator against his surety was commenced November 20, 1937. Final decree determining and directing distribution of the estate was entered November 14, 1929. Judgment was ordered below on the pleadings because the statute of limitations had run. The attempted appeal is from the order for judgment. (Judgment has not been entered.) That order is not appealable, and hence the appeal must be dismissed. State ex rel. Quale v. Penney, 144 Minn. 463, 174 N. W. 611.
Inasmuch as we have heard the argument, it may not be amiss to say that the decision below appears correct under the rule of Ganser v. Ganser, 83 Minn. 199, 86 N. W. 18, 85 A. S. R. 461.
Appeal dismissed.