Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Michael J. Urbanak, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2014-01-08
Citations: 113 A.D.3d 643
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael J. Urbanak, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 113
Pages: 643–643

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael J. Urbanak, Appellant.
[977 NYS2d 918]

Opinion:
The defendant's contention that his plea of guilty should be vacated because the facts to which he allocated do not actually constitute a crime is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Pryor, 11 AD3d 565 [2004]). In any event, contrary to the defendant's contention, the facts to which he allocated constituted the crime of attempted assault in the second degree (see Penal Law § 110.00, 120.05 [9]; see also People v Baez, 13 AD3d 463, 464 [2004]; cf. People v Smielecki, 77 AD3d 1420, 1421-1422 [2010]). Mastro, J.P., Balkin, Sgroi and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.