Case Name: Brown v. Dunham
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1791-03
Citations: 1 Root 272
Docket Number: 
Parties: Brown v. Dunham
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 1
Pages: 272–273

Head Matter:
NEW LONDON COUNTY,
MARCH TERM, A. D. 1791.
Brown v. Dunham
A minor not liable for a fraud in-a contract, who is incapable of making one.
Error to reverse a judgment of a justice in an action of the case for a fraud, in the sale of a horse, brought by Dunham against Brown.
Plea in bar — That> said sale on the 16th of March A. D. 1790 at which time the defendant was a minor under the age of twenty-one years, and under the care of his father.
Plaintiff replied — That-the defendant had the appearance-of a man of full age and was allowed by his father to- trade. Demurrer. J udgment — That the plaintiff’s reply is sufficient.
Error assigned —■ That the plaintiff’s reply is insufficient and ought to have been so- adjudged.

Opinion:
Judgment — Manifest error. The defendant being a minor under the care of his parent, was incapable of making a contract, except for necessaries, therefore could not be guilty of a fraud in contracting.