Case Name: LOUIS E. SMITH et al., Respondents, v. CORA ROTHSCHILD, Appellant
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1934-07-19
Citations: 140 Cal. App. 4
Docket Number: Civ. No. 9427
Parties: LOUIS E. SMITH et al., Respondents, v. CORA ROTHSCHILD, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports
Volume: 140
Pages: 4–5

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 9427.
First Appellate District, Division Two.
July 19, 1934.]
LOUIS E. SMITH et al., Respondents, v. CORA ROTHSCHILD, Appellant.
John H. Black, J. M. Wallace and Ross & Ross for Appellant.
Norman S. Menifee for Respondents.

Opinion:
NOURSE, P. J.
The plaintiffs have moved to dismiss or affirm under the rule upon the grounds that the appeal is frivolous and presents grounds so unsubstantial as not to require further argument. The motion was accompanied by a typewritten brief fully arguing the merits of the appeal. When this motion is made for the purpose of advancing the hearing of an appeal on the merits, or to avoid preparation of a brief under the rules, it should be denied. The motion in this ease is of that character.
Motion denied.
Sturtevant, J., and Spence, J., concurred.