Case Name: Larry WESLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2013-04-30
Citations: 398 S.W.3d 95
Docket Number: No. ED 98739
Parties: Larry WESLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR. P.J. and ROY L. RICHTER and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 398
Pages: 95–95

Head Matter:
Larry WESLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 98739.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
April 30, 2013.
Timothy J. Forneris, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR. P.J. and ROY L. RICHTER and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Larry Wesley ("Movant") appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant argues the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion without an evidentiary hearing because (1) there was no factual basis to support Movant's guilty plea for statutory sodomy in that the State failed to prove Movant touched his daughter's vagina "for the purpose of arousing or gratifying the sexual desire of any person," and (2) Movant's plea counsel was ineffective for misinforming Movant that he would receive a ten to twelve year sentence in exchange for his plea.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).