Case Name: Miguel Angel GARCIA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1992-11-04
Citations: 840 S.W.2d 957
Docket Number: No. 683-90
Parties: Miguel Angel GARCIA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 840
Pages: 957–958

Head Matter:
Miguel Angel GARCIA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
No. 683-90.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.
Nov. 4, 1992.
Don Clowe, Albert Lopez, San Antonio, Joseph A. Connors, III, Dorina Ramos, McAllen, for appellant.
Alger H. Kendall, Jr., Dist. Atty. and Lynn Ellison, Asst. Dist. Atty., Karnes City, Robert Huttash, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
OPINION ON MOTION TO ABATE APPEAL
PER CURIAM.
Appellant was convicted by a jury of the offense of aggravated possession of marihuana and sentenced to fifty years imprisonment in the penitentiary and a fine of $5000.00.
On appeal, the Fourth Court of Appeals reversed the conviction and ordered an acquittal, holding that there was insufficient evidence to support the conviction because there existed a reasonable hypothesis other than the guilt of the accused. Garcia v. State, 790 S.W.2d 22 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1990). We granted the State's petition for discretionary review. In an opinion delivered June 3, 1992, we reversed the judgment of the court of appeals and affirmed the judgment of the trial court. On June 22, 1992, appellant filed a motion for rehearing, which is now moot.
A motion to abate the appeal has been filed on behalf of appellant. Attached to the motion is a certified copy of appellant's certificate of death. The certificate recites that appellant died on September 12, 1992.
The death of an appellant during the pendency of an appeal deprives both this Court and the court of appeals of jurisdiction. See August v. State, 685 S.W.2d 56 (Tex.Cr.App.1985). Under these circumstances, the appropriate disposition is the abatement of the appeal. Tex.R.App.Pro. 9(b). Accordingly, the motion for rehearing is dismissed, the prior opinions are withdrawn and the appeal is permanently abated.