Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kimberly HETRICK, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-10-13
Citations: 114 F. App'x 291
Docket Number: No. 02-50632
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kimberly HETRICK, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: WALLACE, T.G. NELSON, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 114
Pages: 291–292

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kimberly HETRICK, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-50632.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 7, 2004.
Decided Oct. 13, 2004.
David P. Curnow, AUSA, Joseph S. Smith, Jr., San Diego, CA, for PlaintiffAppellee.
Ellis Johnston Fax, FDCA-Federal Defender’S Of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: WALLACE, T.G. NELSON, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Kimberly Hetrick appeals the district court's denial of her motion to suppress marijuana found in the panels of her car as she attempted to cross the border into the United States. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. We grant the Government's unopposed motion to supplement the record on appeal.
United States v. Camacho controls. As in that case, nothing in the record suggests that the Buster posed any danger to the defendant or her vehicle.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
. 368 F.3d 1182 (9th Cir.2004).
. Id. at 1185-86.