Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dennis Tamar FREEMAN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-04-29
Citations: 324 F. App'x 243
Docket Number: No. 09-6169
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dennis Tamar FREEMAN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 324
Pages: 243–243

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dennis Tamar FREEMAN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-6169.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 16, 2009.
Decided: April 29, 2009.
Dennis Tamar Freeman, Appellant Pro Se. D. Monique Broadnax, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Dennis Tamar Freeman appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Freeman, No. 2:07-cr-00122-WDK-JEB-1 (E.D. Va. Jan. 8, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.