Case Name: PETER C. BUCKELEW, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1935-05-17
Citations: 115 N.J.L. 112
Docket Number: 
Parties: PETER C. BUCKELEW, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 115
Pages: 112–112

Head Matter:
PETER C. BUCKELEW, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Submitted February 15, 1935
Decided May 17, 1935.
For the plaintiff-respondent, David T. Wilentz.
For the defendant-appellant, William F. McCloskey.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Mr. Justice Parker.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 10.
For reversal — Heher, J. 1.