Case Name: Andrew Groff, Appellant, v. The Daily Review Corporation, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1936-06
Citations: 248 A.D. 774
Docket Number: Appeal No. 2
Parties: Andrew Groff, Appellant, v. The Daily Review Corporation, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 248
Pages: 774–774

Head Matter:
Andrew Groff, Appellant, v. The Daily Review Corporation, Respondent.
(Appeal No. 2.)

Opinion:
Order denying plaintiff's motion to vacate defendant's notice of examination of the plaintiff before trial reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and plaintiff's motion to vacate the notice granted, with ten dollars costs. The items in the notice are not material or relevant to the partial defense to which they purport to relate. That defense avers that defendant's reporters erroneously gave to it certain information set out. It does not plead the truth of said information thus set out. An examination respecting the truth of such items is, therefore, not material to the issue presented by the partial defense. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.