Case Name: Lawrence NEAL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2016-11-29
Citations: 504 S.W.3d 884
Docket Number: WD 78700
Parties: Lawrence NEAL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Division Two: Lisa White Hardwick, Presiding Judge, Karen King Mitchell and Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judges
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 504
Pages: 884–885

Head Matter:
Lawrence NEAL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
WD 78700
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
FILED: November 29, 2016
Susan L. Hogan, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, and Mary H. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before Division Two: Lisa White Hardwick, Presiding Judge, Karen King Mitchell and Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judges

Opinion:
ORDER
Per Curiam
Lawrence Neal appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion following an evi-dentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the post-conviction judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a formal published opinion would have no precedential value.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).