Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ray PLAIR, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-01-06
Citations: 163 F. App'x 805
Docket Number: No. 05-12913
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ray PLAIR, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before DUBINA, HULL and COX, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 163
Pages: 805–806

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ray PLAIR, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-12913
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Jan. 6, 2006.
David Jonathon Joffe, Joffe & Joffe, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, FL, for PlaintiffAppellee.
Peter J. Sholl, United States Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before DUBINA, HULL and COX, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
David J. Joffe, appointed counsel for Ray Plair in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Plair's convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.