Case Name: Edwards et al. v. Court of Common Pleas of Scioto County et al.
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1963-10-23
Citations: 175 Ohio St. 251
Docket Number: No. 38065
Parties: Edwards et al. v. Court of Common Pleas of Scioto County et al.
Judges: Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, New Service
Volume: 175
Pages: 251–252

Head Matter:
Edwards et al. v. Court of Common Pleas of Scioto County et al.
(No. 38065 —
Decided October 23, 1963.)
Mr. Richard L. Eisnaugle, Mr. J. Alden Stoker, Mr. Ernest G. Littleton and Messrs. Miller, Searl & Fitch, for relators.
Mr. Lowell G. Thompson, for respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Relators are afforded an adequate remedy by way of appeal. This court will ordinarily, in the exercise of its discretion,, deny a writ of prohibition where relator has an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. State, ex rel. Masterson, v. Ohio State Racing Comm., 164 Ohio St., 312, 316. See State, ex rel. Libbeg-Owens-F ord Glass Co., v. Industrial Commission, 162 Ohio St., 302.
The demurrer to the petition is sustained and a writ of prohibition denied.
Writ denied.
Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O'Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur.