Case Name: Bertha Sommer and Others, Suing for Themselves and for the Benefit of John Doe and Mary Roe and Others Having a Common or General Interest in the Setting Aside of the Assessment Known as " Sewers and Appurtenances Rogers Avenue, Empire Boulevard, Winthrop Street, Maple Street, East 21st Street, Caton Avenue, East 37th Street, Diary 7960 RIO," Appellants, v. The City of New York, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1932-10
Citations: 236 A.D. 811
Docket Number: 
Parties: Bertha Sommer and Others, Suing for Themselves and for the Benefit of John Doe and Mary Roe and Others Having a Common or General Interest in the Setting Aside of the Assessment Known as “ Sewers and Appurtenances Rogers Avenue, Empire Boulevard, Winthrop Street, Maple Street, East 21st Street, Caton Avenue, East 37th Street, Diary 7960 RIO,” Appellants, v. The City of New York, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 236
Pages: 811–811

Head Matter:
Bertha Sommer and Others, Suing for Themselves and for the Benefit of John Doe and Mary Roe and Others Having a Common or General Interest in the Setting Aside of the Assessment Known as “ Sewers and Appurtenances Rogers Avenue, Empire Boulevard, Winthrop Street, Maple Street, East 21st Street, Caton Avenue, East 37th Street, Diary 7960 RIO,” Appellants, v. The City of New York, Respondent.

Opinion:
Order dismissing complaint and judgment entered thereon unanimously affirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ.