Case Name: Laquan Lorenzo SIMMONS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY MUNICIPALITY; Kelly Diamond; Sarah Thompson; Allen Rogers; Ms. Rowe; Ms. Stallings; Ms. Slaughter; Frank L. Perry; Thomas Asbell, Defendants-Appellees, and North Carolina Dept of Public Safety, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-12-20
Citations: 671 F. App'x 215
Docket Number: No. 16-7123
Parties: Laquan Lorenzo SIMMONS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY MUNICIPALITY; Kelly Diamond; Sarah Thompson; Allen Rogers; Ms. Rowe; Ms. Stallings; Ms. Slaughter; Frank L. Perry; Thomas Asbell, Defendants-Appellees, and North Carolina Dept of Public Safety, Defendant.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 671
Pages: 215–216

Head Matter:
Laquan Lorenzo SIMMONS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY MUNICIPALITY; Kelly Diamond; Sarah Thompson; Allen Rogers; Ms. Rowe; Ms. Stallings; Ms. Slaughter; Frank L. Perry; Thomas Asbell, Defendants-Appellees, and North Carolina Dept of Public Safety, Defendant.
No. 16-7123
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: December 15, 2016
Decided: December 20, 2016
Laquan Lorenzo Simmons, Appellant Pro Se.
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Laquan Lorenzo Simmons appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) civil rights action on 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012) review. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Simmons' informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, Simmons has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are' adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED