Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Samuel Baglio, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1929-03
Citations: 226 A.D. 721
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Samuel Baglio, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 226
Pages: 721–722

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Samuel Baglio, Respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event, upon the ground that the evidence presented a question of fact as to whether the defendant violated the statute in the manner described in the complaint. All concur. Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Edgeomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.
See Conservation Law, § 182, subd. 1, and § 185, subds. 1, 6, 8, added by Laws of 1912, chap. 318, as amd. by Laws of 1925, chaps. 350, 353, and Laws of 1927, chap. 106; since amd. by Laws of 1928, chaps. 242, 586, and Laws of 1929, chap. 275 — [Rep.