Case Name: Frederick S. ROTHMAN, Appellant, v. GOLD MASTER CORPORATION, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1975-10-28
Citations: 323 So. 2d 586
Docket Number: No. 75-267
Parties: Frederick S. ROTHMAN, Appellant, v. GOLD MASTER CORPORATION, Appellee.
Judges: Before PEARSON, HENDRY and NATHAN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 323
Pages: 586–586

Head Matter:
Frederick S. ROTHMAN, Appellant, v. GOLD MASTER CORPORATION, Appellee.
No. 75-267.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 28, 1975.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 12, 1976.
Caidin, Rothenberg, Kogan, Kornblum & Benjamin, Miami, for appellant.
Leslie A. Todd, Miami, for appellee.
Before PEARSON, HENDRY and NATHAN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is the second appearance of this case before this court. Our prior decision of Fla.App., 287 So.2d 735 held that the complaint stated a cause of action. This appeal is from a summary final judgment in which the court held that the facts properly before it showed that there was no genuine issue of material fact and that the defendant was entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. The trial judge's decision is amply supported by the law as stated in Connolly v. Sebeco, Inc., Fla.1956, 89 So.2d 482.
Affirmed.