Case Name: Cleo M. CLARK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GREENSVILLE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL/EMPORIA HOSPITAL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-01-14
Citations: 24 F. App'x 206
Docket Number: No. 01-1848
Parties: Cleo M. CLARK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GREENSVILLE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL/EMPORIA HOSPITAL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 24
Pages: 206–206

Head Matter:
Cleo M. CLARK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GREENSVILLE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL/EMPORIA HOSPITAL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 01-1848.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 26, 2001.
Decided Jan. 14, 2002.
Cleo M. Clark, Appellant Pro Se. Karen Skeirik Elliott, McCandlish Kain, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WIDENER, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Cleo M. Clark appeals from the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation that summary judgment be granted in favor of Greens-ville Memorial in Clark's action alleging racially motivated employment discrimination. We have reviewed the record, the district court's opinion, and the magistrate judge's report and recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Clark v. Greensville Mem'l Hosp., No. CA-00-403 (E.D.Va. May 24, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.