Case Name: Larnell HENDRICK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ms. BOOTH, Associate Psychologist, Individual and Official Capacity; William Bohrer, Security Chief, Individual and Official Capacity, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-06-14
Citations: 654 F. App'x 136
Docket Number: No. 15-8024
Parties: Larnell HENDRICK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ms. BOOTH, Associate Psychologist, Individual and Official Capacity; William Bohrer, Security Chief, Individual and Official Capacity, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 654
Pages: 136–137

Head Matter:
Larnell HENDRICK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ms. BOOTH, Associate Psychologist, Individual and Official Capacity; William Bohrer, Security Chief, Individual and Official Capacity, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15-8024
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 10, 2016
Decided: June 14, 2016
Larnell Hendrick, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
• Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Larnell Hendrick appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hendrick v. Booth, No. 8:14-cv-04021-TDC, 2015 WL 8055172 (D.Md. Dec. 3, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.