Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Joseph GILBERT, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-12-23
Citations: 463 F. App'x 674
Docket Number: No. 09-30438
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Joseph GILBERT, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 463
Pages: 674–675

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Joseph GILBERT, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-30438.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 19, 2011.
Filed Dec. 23, 2011.
Helen J. Brunner, Esquire, Aravind Swaminathan, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Ronald D. Ness, Port Orchard, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Michael Joseph Gilbert appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 240-month sentence for production of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a) and (e), and 2256, and receipt of visual depictions of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2) and (b)(1), and 2256. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Gilbert's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.
We have provided Gilbert with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. He has filed a pro se supplemental brief, which we have considered.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief as to the Gilbert's conviction. We dismiss the appeal of the sentence in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2000).
Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
The conviction is AFFIRMED, and the appeal of the sentence is DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.