Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. William C. RUNYON, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1980-05-27
Citations: 621 F.2d 317
Docket Number: No. 79-2072
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. William C. RUNYON, Appellant.
Judges: Before HEANEY, BRIGHT and STEPHENSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 621
Pages: 317–318

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. William C. RUNYON, Appellant.
No. 79-2072.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted May 19, 1980.
Decided May 27, 1980.
Paul A. Zoss, Myers, Knox & Hart, Des Moines, Iowa, for appellant.
Roxanne Barton Conlin, U. S. Atty. and Kermit B. Anderson, Asst. U. S. Atty., Des Moines, Iowa, for appellee.
Before HEANEY, BRIGHT and STEPHENSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Runyon was convicted on three counts of possessing unregistered firearms in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5861(d) and 5871. The sole contention raised on appeal is whether the trial court committed plain error in failing to give an unrequested insanity instruction to the jury. In our judgment, the court did not plainly err. The charge of possession of unregistered firearms requires only that the defendant be shown to have possessed an item that he knew to be a firearm. Morgan v. United States, 564 F.2d 803, 805 (8th Cir. 1977). Runyon introduced testimony by a psychiatrist in an attempt to show he did not have that knowledge, and the trial judge instructed the jury on that issue. In light of Runyon's failure to pursue an insanity defense at trial or to request an instruction thereon, plain error was not shown by the court's failure to instruct the jury on that defense. See United States v. DiBenedetto, 542 F.2d 490, 494 (8th Cir. 1976).