Case Name: PATRICK J. FORENZA AND THOMAS RIZZI, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. FRANK E. RODGERS, CLERK OF HUDSON COUNTY, ANTHONY RAFFAELE, WILLIAM STOECKER AND THE HUDSON COUNTY DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1993-11-19
Citations: 268 N.J. Super. 370
Docket Number: 
Parties: PATRICK J. FORENZA AND THOMAS RIZZI, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. FRANK E. RODGERS, CLERK OF HUDSON COUNTY, ANTHONY RAFFAELE, WILLIAM STOECKER AND THE HUDSON COUNTY DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 268
Pages: 370–371

Head Matter:
633 A.2d 1001
PATRICK J. FORENZA AND THOMAS RIZZI, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. FRANK E. RODGERS, CLERK OF HUDSON COUNTY, ANTHONY RAFFAELE, WILLIAM STOECKER AND THE HUDSON COUNTY DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued November 3, 1993 —
Decided November 19, 1993.
Before Judges PRESSLER, DREIER and BROCHIN.
Neil D. Marotta argued the cause for appellants (Libero D. Marotta, attorney).
Marta Baez Petrocelli argued the cause for respondent Frank E. Rodgers (Francis De Leonardis, Hudson County Counsel, attorney; Mark E. Morchel, Deputy County Counsel, on the brief).
Scarinci & Hollenbeck, attorneys for respondent Hudson County Democratic Committee, relied on the brief filed by Hudson County Counsel.
Respondents Anthony Raffaele and William Stoecker did not file a brief.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The judgment appealed from is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated by Judge D'Italia in his written opinion reported at 268 N.J.Super. 482, 633 A.2d 1057.