Case Name: The CLOTHES TREE, INC., Petitioner, v. VMS REALTY INVESTMENT, an Illinois General Partnership f/k/a VMS Realty Partners, and Boca-CWP, an Illinois General Partnership, as General Partners of Boca Raton Hotel and Club, Limited Partnership, Respondents
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1988-05-25
Citations: 524 So. 2d 1174
Docket Number: No. 87-1677
Parties: The CLOTHES TREE, INC., Petitioner, v. VMS REALTY INVESTMENT, an Illinois General Partnership f/k/a VMS Realty Partners, and Boca-CWP, an Illinois General Partnership, as General Partners of Boca Raton Hotel and Club, Limited Partnership, Respondents.
Judges: HERSEY, C.J., DOWNEY, J., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., (Retired), Associate Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 524
Pages: 1174–1174

Head Matter:
The CLOTHES TREE, INC., Petitioner, v. VMS REALTY INVESTMENT, an Illinois General Partnership f/k/a VMS Realty Partners, and Boca-CWP, an Illinois General Partnership, as General Partners of Boca Raton Hotel and Club, Limited Partnership, Respondents.
No. 87-1677.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
May 25, 1988.
Richard Johnston, Jr., of Siemon, Larsen, Mattlin & Purdy, Boca Raton, for petitioner.
Kim St. James of Broad and Cassel, West Palm Beach, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The circuit court, sitting in its appellate capacity, dismissed as moot petitioner's appeal from a county court judgment of eviction upon a showing that petitioner had surrendered possession of the leased premises subsequent to the judgment. At that time there remained pending in the county court petitioner's severed counterclaim for damages on its theory of wrongful eviction. The viability of the counterclaim was dependent upon petitioner obtaining a reversal of the judgment of eviction. Consequently, even if regaining possession was a remedy no longer available to petitioner (an issue which we do not decide), should the judgment of eviction be reversed petitioner would then have available to it the possibility of prevailing on its claim for money damages. Because the parties continue to have a legally cognizable interest in the outcome of the appeal, it is not moot. We grant certiorari and quash the order of dismissal on the authority of Alexander v. Adams, 501 So.2d 15 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986).
Certiorari granted; order quashed.
HERSEY, C.J., DOWNEY, J., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., (Retired), Associate Judge, concur.