Case Name: Reinz Baez, Respondent, v. Kostas Kayantas et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2002-10-15
Citations: 298 A.D.2d 416
Docket Number: 
Parties: Reinz Baez, Respondent, v Kostas Kayantas et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 298
Pages: 416–417

Head Matter:
(October 15, 2002)
Reinz Baez, Respondent, v Kostas Kayantas et al., Appellants.
[748 NYS2d 389]

Opinion:
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty, J.), dated March 12, 2002, as granted the plaintiffs motion to "restore" the case to the trial calendar.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
CPLR 3404 is inapplicable because the case was never marked off pursuant to that provision. Rather, the case was mistakenly marked settled by the court. Accordingly, the Supreme Court correctly restored the case to its prior position on the trial calendar (see Hernandez v City of New York, 290 AD2d 416). Florio, J.P., S. Miller, Crane and Mastro, JJ., concur.