Case Name: Mary Watson Reik, respondent, v. Henry O. Reik, appellant
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1928-05-14
Citations: 103 N.J. Eq. 23
Docket Number: 
Parties: Mary Watson Reik, respondent, v. Henry O. Reik, appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 103
Pages: 23–23

Head Matter:
Mary Watson Reik, respondent, v. Henry O. Reik, appellant.
[Decided May 14th, 1928.]
Messrs. Cole & Cole, for the respondent.
Messrs. Bourgeois & Coulomb, for the appellant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Ingersoll, and reported in 101 N. J. Eq. 523.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Teenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Héteield, Dear, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.