Case Name: Mark SCHWARTZ, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, v. NATWEST MARKETS, PLC., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-07-17
Citations: 40 F. App'x 634
Docket Number: Nos. 01-9153(L), 01-9176(XAP)
Parties: Mark SCHWARTZ, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, v. NATWEST MARKETS, PLC., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 40
Pages: 634–635

Head Matter:
Mark SCHWARTZ, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, v. NATWEST MARKETS, PLC., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant.
Nos. 01-9153(L), 01-9176(XAP).
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
July 17, 2002.
Robert M. Bursky, Esq., Wechsler, Bur-sky & Cohen LLP, New York, NY, for Appellant.
Kenneth Kelly, Esq., Epstein, Becker & Green, P.C., New York, NY, for Appellee.
Present WINTER, F.I. PARKER and POOLER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
SUMMARY ORDER
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.
Plaintiff-appellant Mark Schwartz appeals from that part of the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Allen G. Schwartz, Judge), dated September 6, 2001, which dismissed one of his breach of contract claims against Defendant Appel-lee NatWest Markets, PLC. NatWest has abandoned its appeal from another part of the judgement.
The parties' dispute on appeal centers on whether plaintiff was properly terminated for "cause" according to the terms of their employment agreement. The district court's factual findings have not been disputed on appeal, and we agree with both the district court's legal analysis and its application of the law to the facts. Therefore, for substantially the same reasons as set forth in the opinion below, we AFFIRM.