Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Finn Erik Rothman, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2011-06-21
Citations: 85 A.D.3d 1064
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Finn Erik Rothman, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 85
Pages: 1064–1065

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Finn Erik Rothman, Appellant.
[925 NYS2d 863]

Opinion:
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Hinrichs, J.), rendered August 13, 2009, convicting him of grand larceny in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant's assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Dillon, J.P., Covello, Balkin, Lott and Roman, JJ., concur.