Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Albert RANDOLPH, a/k/a Spo, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-08-23
Citations: 443 F. App'x 873
Docket Number: No. 11-6691
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Albert RANDOLPH, a/k/a Spo, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 443
Pages: 873–873

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Albert RANDOLPH, a/k/a Spo, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 11-6691.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 18, 2011.
Decided: Aug. 23, 2011.
Albert Randolph, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Sinclair Duffey, Robert E. Trono, Assistant United States Attorneys, David Novak, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Albert Randolph appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion for a reduction in sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Randolph, No. 3:01-cr00304-JRS-11 (E.D.Va. May 6, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.