Case Name: Itzhak SHALOM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-05-05
Citations: 128 F. App'x 323
Docket Number: No. 04-8027
Parties: Itzhak SHALOM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 128
Pages: 323–323

Head Matter:
Itzhak SHALOM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 04-8027.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 28, 2005.
Decided May 5, 2005.
Itzhak Shalom, Appellant pro se. Barbara Slaymaker Sale, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Itzhak Shalom appeals from the district court's order denying in part and granting in part his Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(g) motion for the return of seized property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Shalom v. United States, No. CA-04-311BEL (D.Md. Nov. 8, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED