Case Name: In the Matter of Frank Mosner, Appellant, against Ambrose J. Haddock, a City Magistrate of the City of New York, as and Constituting the Municipal Term, Borough of Manhattan, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1944-06-02
Citations: 268 A.D. 752
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Frank Mosner, Appellant, against Ambrose J. Haddock, a City Magistrate of the City of New York, as and Constituting the Municipal Term, Borough of Manhattan, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 268
Pages: 752–753

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Frank Mosner, Appellant, against Ambrose J. Haddock, a City Magistrate of the City of New York, as and Constituting the Municipal Term, Borough of Manhattan, Respondent.

Opinion:
Order affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley; Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Untermyer, J., concurs on the ground that prohibition is not the proper remedy since the determination of the City Magistrate can be adequately reviewed by appeal. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1285; People ex rel. Livingston v. Wyatt, 186 N. Y. 383.) [181 Misc. 486.]