Case Name: School District of Pittsburgh v. Trumbull Corporation, Appellant, et al.
Court: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1975-06-24
Citations: 235 Pa. Super. 412
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 67
Parties: School District of Pittsburgh v. Trumbull Corporation, Appellant, et al.
Judges: Before Watkins, P. J., Jacobs, Hoffman, Cercone, Price, Van der Voort, and Spaeth, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania Superior Court Reports
Volume: 235
Pages: 412–412

Head Matter:
School District of Pittsburgh v. Trumbull Corporation, Appellant, et al.
Argued April 16, 1975.
Before Watkins, P. J., Jacobs, Hoffman, Cercone, Price, Van der Voort, and Spaeth, JJ.
W. Arch Irvin, Jr., with him Way man, Irvin, Trushel & McAuley, for appellant.
William W. Guthrie, for appellee.
June 24, 1975:

Opinion:
Opinion
Per Curiam,
The court below dismissed a complaint against the Urban Redevelopment Authority of Pittsburgh because the court believed that the Redevelopment Authority was entitled to the protection of sovereign immunity under Brown v. Commonwealth, 453 Pa. 566, 305 A.2d 868 (1973). In a companion case filed today involving the Redevelopment Authority of Philadelphia, Greer v. Metropolitan Hospital, 235 Pa. Superior Ct. 266, 341 A.2d 520 (1975) we have held to the contrary.
Accordingly, the order below is reversed, and the complaint reinstated.