Case Name: CHESTERFIELD ASSOCIATES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. EDISON TOWNSHIP, (MIDDLESEX COUNTY), DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1994-03-24
Citations: 14 N.J. Tax 181
Docket Number: 
Parties: CHESTERFIELD ASSOCIATES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. EDISON TOWNSHIP, (MIDDLESEX COUNTY), DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Tax Court Reports
Volume: 14
Pages: 167–168

Head Matter:
CHESTERFIELD ASSOCIATES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. EDISON TOWNSHIP, (MIDDLESEX COUNTY), DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued February 15, 1994
Decided March 24, 1994.
Before Judges PRESSLER and BROCHIN.
Harold A Kuskin argued the cause for appellant (Lasser, Hochman, Marcus, Guryan & Kuskin, attorneys; Mr. Kuskin, of counsel; Bruce H. Snyder, on the brief).
Margery S. Golin argued the cause for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff Chesterfield Associates is the owner • of ninety-five townhouses in Edison Township. It has appealed from the judgment of the Tax Court which fixed the assessment for these properties for the tax years 1990, 1991 and 1992.
Having carefully considered the record in this matter and the briefs and arguments of counsel, we affirm the judgment of the Tax Court substantially for the reasons stated in the opinion of Honorable Michael A. Andrew, Jr., J.T.C. dated April 26, 1993.