Case Name: William Duane ELLEDGE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Richard L. DUGGER, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1987-11-10
Citations: 833 F.2d 250
Docket Number: No. 86-5120
Parties: William Duane ELLEDGE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Richard L. DUGGER, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before RONEY, Chief Judge, HATCHETT and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges:
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 833
Pages: 250–251

Head Matter:
William Duane ELLEDGE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Richard L. DUGGER, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 86-5120.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Nov. 10, 1987.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, Craig S. Barnard, Chief Asst. Public Defender, W. Palm Beach, Fla., Richard H. Burr, III, New York City, for petitioner-appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Penny H. Brill, Robert L. Bogen, Richard Bart-man, Asst. Attys. Gen., W. Palm Beach, Fla., for respondent-appellee.
Before RONEY, Chief Judge, HATCHETT and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges:

Opinion:
ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
PER CURIAM:
Part III of our original opinion (823 F.2d 1439) is, hereby, withdrawn. Except for this modification, the petitions for rehearing are denied. The Court having been polled at the request of one of its members and a majority of the judges in active service not having voted in favor of it, the petition for rehearing en banc is denied.