Case Name: Betty Jean FOSTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David FRAZIER, Judge, Whitman County Superior Court, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-09-16
Citations: 75 F. App'x 630
Docket Number: No. 02-35213; D.C. No. CV-01-00396-EFS
Parties: Betty Jean FOSTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David FRAZIER, Judge, Whitman County Superior Court, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 75
Pages: 630–631

Head Matter:
Betty Jean FOSTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David FRAZIER, Judge, Whitman County Superior Court, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 02-35213.
D.C. No. CV-01-00396-EFS.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 8, 2003.
Decided Sept. 16, 2003.
Betty Jean Foster, Bolivar, MO, pro se.
Before PREGERSON, THOMAS and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Betty Jean Foster appeals pro se the district court's sua sponte dismissal for lack of jurisdiction of her petition for a writ of mandamus, requesting that the district court invalidate state court orders in a child custody action that were entered while she had removed the action to federal court. We conclude that the district court did not err in finding it lacked jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus to a state court. Demos v. United States Dist. Court for E. Dist. of Wash., 925 F.2d 1160, 1161 (9th Cir.1991). Moreover, the district court did not err in dismissing with prejudice without leave to amend where amendment would be futile. Schmier v. U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 279 F.3d 817, 824 (9th Cir.2002). The district court's dismissal is therefore
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.