Case Name: Baljunder S. MATHARU and Jessica A. Matharu, Individually and as Administrators of the Estate of Milan Singh Matharu, Deceased, Respondents v. Scott D. MUIR, D.O., Fiorina Pellegrino, D.O., Hazelton Women's Care Center and Muir Ob/Gyn Associates, P.C., Petitioners
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2013-08-22
Citations: 621 Pa. 106
Docket Number: No. 543 MAL 2011
Parties: Baljunder S. MATHARU and Jessica A. Matharu, Individually and as Administrators of the Estate of Milan Singh Matharu, Deceased, Respondents v. Scott D. MUIR, D.O., Fiorina Pellegrino, D.O., Hazelton Women’s Care Center and Muir Ob/Gyn Associates, P.C., Petitioners.
Judges: 
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 621
Pages: 106–107

Head Matter:
73 A.3d 576
Baljunder S. MATHARU and Jessica A. Matharu, Individually and as Administrators of the Estate of Milan Singh Matharu, Deceased, Respondents v. Scott D. MUIR, D.O., Fiorina Pellegrino, D.O., Hazelton Women’s Care Center and Muir Ob/Gyn Associates, P.C., Petitioners.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Aug. 22, 2013.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 22nd day of August, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, the Order of the Superior Court is VACATED, and this matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court for reconsideration in light of Seebold v. Prison Health Serv., 618 Pa. 632, 57 A.3d 1232 (2012).
Petitioners' Application to Remand this Matter to Superior Court for Reconsideration in Light of Seebold, is DISMISSED as moot.
Justice Baer dissents and would deny the allocatur petition as he views Seebold v. Prison Health Serv., 618 Pa. 632, 57 A.3d 1232 (2012) as distinguishable from this case.