Case Name: Helga Norman, Respondent, v. Aetna Life Insurance Company, Appellant, et al., Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1972-01-25
Citations: 38 A.D.2d 699
Docket Number: 
Parties: Helga Norman, Respondent, v. Aetna Life Insurance Company, Appellant, et al., Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 38
Pages: 699–699

Head Matter:
Helga Norman, Respondent, v. Aetna Life Insurance Company, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on May 12, 1971, denying defendant, Aetna's, motion to preclude, to examine witnesses before trial and for discovery and inspection, unanimously modified, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs and without disbursements, to the extent of directing plaintiff to respond to items F, G, H, and J of Aetna's demand for a bill of particulars and directing plaintiff to disclose the repair work done on the automobile operated by her deceased husband, and otherwise affirmed. Said information is to be supplied within five days after service upon plaintiff by appellant of a copy of this court's order, with notice of entry thereon. The items of Aetna's demand, enumerated above, are neither oppressive, burdensome, nor improper. They relate to the central issue in the ease of whether or not plaintiff's husband died by accidental means or as the result of a pre-existing heart condition. Accordingly, plaintiff's failure to timely move to modify said demand requires that she be directed to promptly respond thereto (Coin v. Lebenkoff, 10 A D 2d 916). Upon her pretrial examination plaintiff expressly agreed to annex to the transcript of her testimony the repair work done to the automobile after her husband's death. Plaintiff has never furnished this information. Concur — McGivern, J. P., Nunez, Kupferman, Murphy and Capozzoli, JJ.