Case Name: Fahed FAYAD, M.D., Appellant, v. MERCY HOSPITAL, INC., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-12-13
Citations: 773 So. 2d 1244
Docket Number: No. 3D00-1629
Parties: Fahed FAYAD, M.D., Appellant, v. MERCY HOSPITAL, INC., Appellee.
Judges: Before LEVY, GODERICH, and GREEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 773
Pages: 1244–1244

Head Matter:
Fahed FAYAD, M.D., Appellant, v. MERCY HOSPITAL, INC., Appellee.
No. 3D00-1629.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 13, 2000.
Beasley, Leacock & Hauser, James W. Beasley and Robert Hauser, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Kenny Nachwalter Seymour Arnold Critchlow & Spector, Robert D.W. Landon, III, and Thomas H. Seymour, Miami, for appellee.
Before LEVY, GODERICH, and GREEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Because the appellant failed to establish the elements necessary for the entry of a temporary injunction, South Fla. Limousines, Inc. v. Broward County Aviation Dept., 512 So.2d 1059, 1061 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)("In order for a temporary injunction to be granted, the plaintiff must prove that: (1) he will suffer irreparable harm unless the status quo is maintained; (2) he has no adequate remedy at law; (3) he has a clear legal right to the relief requested; and (4) a temporary injunction will serve the public interest."), the trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying the appellant's motion for temporary injunction. See Perry & Co. v. First Sec. Ins. Underwriters, Inc., 654 So.2d 671 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995).
Affirmed.