Case Name: Pasquale De Lilli, Respondent, v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation et al., Appellants; General Telephone Company of Upstate New York, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Perini Corporation, Third-Party Defendant; Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Perini Corporation, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1963-12-27
Citations: 20 A.D.2d 611
Docket Number: 
Parties: Pasquale De Lilli, Respondent, v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation et al., Appellants. General Telephone Company of Upstate New York, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Perini Corporation, Third-Party Defendant. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Perini Corporation, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 20
Pages: 611–611

Head Matter:
Pasquale De Lilli, Respondent, v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation et al., Appellants. General Telephone Company of Upstate New York, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Perini Corporation, Third-Party Defendant. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Perini Corporation, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

Opinion:
Orders affirmed, without costs. Our affirmance does not, of course, indicate an opinion on our part as to whether the order or orders of preclusion referred to in the condition imposed at Special Term should be vacated with respect to any or all of the defendants. Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur; Taylor, J., not voting.