Case Name: Fang Ping LI, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-12-07
Citations: 157 F. App'x 401
Docket Number: No. 03-40414-AG
Parties: Fang Ping LI, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: PRESENT: WALKER, Chief Judge, CALABRESI, and POOLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 157
Pages: 401–401

Head Matter:
Fang Ping LI, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 03-40414-AG.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Dec. 7, 2005.
Joan Xie, New York, NY, for Petitioner.
Kenneth L. Wainstein, United States Attorney for the District of Columbia; Madelyn E. Johnson, Mary R. Pipitone, Assistant United States Attorneys, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
PRESENT: WALKER, Chief Judge, CALABRESI, and POOLER, Circuit Judges.
. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c)(2), Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales is automatically substituted for former Attorney General John Ashcroft as a respondent in this case.

Opinion:
SUMMARY ORDER
Fang Ping Li, through counsel, petitions for review of the BIA order affirming the Immigration Judge's ("U") decision denying her application for asylum and withholding of deportation. We assume the parties' familiarity with the underlying facts, procedural history, and specification of issues on this petition for review.
After examining the record, we find that substantial evidence supports the IJ's determination that Li did not credibly testify about her alleged pregnancy, forcible abortion, and threatened sterilization and thus did not establish eligibility for asylum or withholding of removal. We therefore cannot set aside the IJ's findings of fact. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B). Moreover, we find no error of law requiring a remand. Cf Qiu v. Ashcroft, 329 F.3d 140, 149 (2d Cir.2003).
Review is therefore DENIED.