Case Name: In re Rose SERRANO and Julian Serrano
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 2005-02-17
Citations: 224 S.W.3d 225
Docket Number: No. 08-05-00065-CV
Parties: In re Rose SERRANO and Julian Serrano.
Judges: Before BARAJAS, C.J., McCLURE, and CHEW, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 224
Pages: 225–226

Head Matter:
In re Rose SERRANO and Julian Serrano.
No. 08-05-00065-CV.
Court of Appeals of Texas, El Paso.
Feb. 17, 2005.
Rehearing Overruled April 27, 2005.
Rosa Serrano, Santa Tererea, pro se.
Corey Haugland, James, Goldman & Haugland, P.C., El Paso, Stephen Porter, Addison, Clyde A. Pine Jr., Mounce, Green, Myers, Safi & Galatzan, Gregory C. Anderson, Anderson, Anderson, Bright & Crout, Patrick Fholer, El Paso, for Interested Parties.
Before BARAJAS, C.J., McCLURE, and CHEW, JJ.

Opinion:
OPINION ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Justice.
Relators, Rosa Serrano and Julian Serrano, asks this Court to issue a writ of mandamus against the Honorable William E. Moody, Judge of the 34th District Court of El Paso County. Mandamus will lie only to correct a clear abuse of discretion. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 840 (Tex.1992)(orig. proceeding). Moreover, there must be no other adequate remedy at law. Id. Based on the record before us, we are unable to conclude that Respondent clearly abused his discretion or that Relators have no other adequate remedy. Accordingly, we deny mandamus relief. See Tex.R.App. P. 52.8(a).