Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. FRANK GENE CULLETT, JR., Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1987-06-24
Citations: 86 Or. App. 219
Docket Number: J84-0971; CA A40881
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. FRANK GENE CULLETT, JR., Appellant.
Judges: Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Warren and Rossman, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 86
Pages: 219–220

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted May 27,
reversed and remanded for new trial June 24, 1987
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. FRANK GENE CULLETT, JR., Appellant.
(J84-0971; CA A40881)
738 P2d 611
Stephen J. Williams, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.
Thomas H. Denney, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.
Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Warren and Rossman, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant seeks reversal of his conviction for theft in the first degree, contending that he- was tried without a jury and that there is neither a written waiver of his right to a jury trial, ORS 136.001, nor a recorded oral waiver of a jury trial.
The state concedes that there is no written waiver in the trial court file and that there is no record of an oral waiver in the transcription by the court reporter. Accordingly, defendant is entitled to a new trial. State v. Rogers, 83 Or App 270, 730 P2d 43 (1986); State v. Naughten, 5 Or App 6, 480 P2d 448, rev den (1971).
Reversed and remanded for a new trial.