Case Name: NEWPORT MOTEL, INC., Appellant, v. FIVE SEAS INVESTORS, INC., Chrysler Capital Realty, Inc., and Newport Operating Corporation, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-06-18
Citations: 580 So. 2d 894
Docket Number: No. 90-1521
Parties: NEWPORT MOTEL, INC., Appellant, v. FIVE SEAS INVESTORS, INC., Chrysler Capital Realty, Inc., and Newport Operating Corporation, Appellees.
Judges: Before FERGUSON, COPE and GODERICH, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 580
Pages: 894–895

Head Matter:
NEWPORT MOTEL, INC., Appellant, v. FIVE SEAS INVESTORS, INC., Chrysler Capital Realty, Inc., and Newport Operating Corporation, Appellees.
No. 90-1521.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
June 18, 1991.
Abrams, Anton, Robbins, Resnick & Schneider and Maurice M. Garcia, Hollywood, for appellant.
Kluger, Peretz, Kaplan & Berlin and Steven I. Peretz; Coll, Davidson, Carter, Smith, Salter & Barkett and Vance E. Sal ter and Michael J. Higer, Miami, for appel-lees.
Before FERGUSON, COPE and GODERICH, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The plaintiff appeals the trial court's entry of final summary judgment in favor of the defendants. We affirm.
We agree with the trial court's finding that the lease and the assignment were unambiguous on their face and that no extrinsic evidence need be considered. See McClure v. Painewebber, Inc., 549 So.2d 1157, 1158 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Acceleration Nat'l Service Corp. v. Brickell Financial Services Motor Club, Inc., 541 So.2d 738, 739 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 548 So.2d 662 (Fla.1989). That being so, the trial court was faced with a question of law and summary final judgment was properly entered in favor of the defendants.
Affirmed.