Case Name: The State, ex rel. Hadlock, Appellant, v. Corrigan, Judge, Appellee
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1991-12-11
Citations: 62 Ohio St. 3d 202
Docket Number: No. 91-1273
Parties: The State, ex rel. Hadlock, Appellant, v. Corrigan, Judge, Appellee.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 62
Pages: 202–202

Head Matter:
The State, ex rel. Hadlock, Appellant, v. Corrigan, Judge, Appellee.
[Cite as State, ex rel. Hadlock, v. Corrigan (1991), 62 Ohio St.3d 202.]
(No. 91-1273
Submitted September 17, 1991
Decided December 11, 1991.)
Wes Hadlock, pro se.
Stephanie Tubbs Jones, Prosecuting Attorney, and Laurence R. Snyder, for appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. None of appellant's claims challenges the sentencing court's jurisdiction; therefore, appeal and post-conviction relief are adequate remedies at law.
Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.