Case Name: Osmel ALVAREZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2005-12-14
Citations: 916 So. 2d 65
Docket Number: No. 3D04-1028
Parties: Osmel ALVAREZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before LEVY and SHEPHERD, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 916
Pages: 65–65

Head Matter:
Osmel ALVAREZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D04-1028.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 14, 2005.
Woodward & Reizenstein and Philip L. Reizenstein, Miami, for appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General and Douglas J. Glaid (Ft.Lauderdale), Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before LEVY and SHEPHERD, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The order below, entered after an extensive evidentiary hearing, denied the appellant's application for relief from a judgment affirmed in Alvarez v. State, 774 So.2d 802 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), review denied, 791 So.2d 1094 (Fla.2001), on grounds of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. That order is itself affirmed. See Florida v. Nixon, 543 U.S. 175, 125 S.Ct. 551, 160 L.Ed.2d 565 (2004); Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).
Affirmed.