Case Name: Carl Seidenfrau, Respondent, v. Samuel Sutro, Appellant, et al., Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1958-10-06
Citations: 6 A.D.2d 1047
Docket Number: 
Parties: Carl Seidenfrau, Respondent, v. Samuel Sutro, Appellant, et al., Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 6
Pages: 1047–1047

Head Matter:
Carl Seidenfrau, Respondent, v. Samuel Sutro, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Opinion:
In an action to recover damages for fraud, the appeal is from so much of an order as denies appellant's motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.