Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Olga Leticia FLORES-BENITEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-06-19
Citations: 38 F. App'x 473
Docket Number: No. 01-50182; D.C. No. CR-00-00841-CAS(A)
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Olga Leticia FLORES-BENITEZ, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 38
Pages: 473–474

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Olga Leticia FLORES-BENITEZ, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 01-50182.
D.C. No. CR-00-00841-CAS(A).
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 10, 2002.
Decided June 19, 2002.
Before RYMER, T.G. NELSON, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Olga Leticia Flores-Benitez appeals her conviction by guilty plea and sentence for one count of being an alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Flores-Beni-tez's attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and a motion to withdraw as counsel on the ground that he failed to discover any arguable issues for review.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable issues. Counsel's motion to withdraw is therefore GRANTED and the judgment is
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.