Case Name: SHEN WEI (USA) INC. and Medline Industries, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SEMPERMED, INC., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-02-05
Citations: 449 F. App'x 4
Docket Number: No. 2009-1318
Parties: SHEN WEI (USA) INC. and Medline Industries, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SEMPERMED, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before NEWMAN, FRIEDMAN, and PROST, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 449
Pages: 4–4

Head Matter:
SHEN WEI (USA) INC. and Medline Industries, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SEMPERMED, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 2009-1318.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Feb. 5, 2010.
Edward F. McCormack, Russell J. Genet, Jodi Rosen Wine, Nixon Peabody, LLP, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
Michael J. Fink, Neil F. Greenblum, P. Branko Pejic, Mark Benjamin Angres, Fahd K. Majiduddin, Greenblum & Bernstein, P.L.C., Reston, VA, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before NEWMAN, FRIEDMAN, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ON MOTION
ORDER
The parties advise that they have reached agreement to settle this matter, and that consideration of this appeal is no longer necessary. The parties jointly move for remand to the district court in order to allow that court to consider their motion for vacatur of that court's judgment. We apply the procedure followed in Taurus IP, LLC v. Ford Motor Co., 315 Fed.Appx. 252 (Fed.Cir.2008) (non-prece-dential).
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) The motion is granted, and the case is remanded to the district court so that the parties may request that court to consider vacating its judgment due to settlement.
(2) The motion to dismiss is denied as moot.
(3) Each side shall bear its own costs.