Case Name: Shante WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2015-02-17
Citations: 455 S.W.3d 476
Docket Number: No. ED 101058
Parties: Shante WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J. and Robert G. Dowd, Jr. and Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 455
Pages: 476–477

Head Matter:
Shante WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 101058
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Filed: February 17, 2015
Amanda P. Faerber, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Karen L. Kramer, Asst. Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899, for Respondent.
Before Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J. and Robert G. Dowd, Jr. and Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Shante Wright appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary, hearing. Wright argues that his trial counsel was ineffective for advising him to testify in his own defense. We find the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm.
An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).