Case Name: ALLEN v. BREWSTER
Court: Supreme Court of Texas
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1943-12-15
Citations: 176 S.W.2d 311
Docket Number: No. 8156
Parties: ALLEN v. BREWSTER.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 176
Pages: 311–312

Head Matter:
ALLEN v. BREWSTER.
No. 8156.
Supreme Court of Texas.
Dec. 15, 1943.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 12, 1944.
Kennemer & Armstrong and Blakley & Armstrong, all of Dallas, for appellant.
J. W. Randall, of Dallas, amicus curiae.
Coke & Coke and Thos. G. Murnane, all of Dallas, for appellee.

Opinion:
SHARP, Justice.
This suit involves the validity of a certificate issued by the Woodmen of the World Life Insurance Society, in which certificate Patsy Allen was designated beneficiary. It was contended in the trial court that Patsy Allen should be denied the right to collect the proceeds of such certificate, because. she did not have an insurable interest in the life of Henry A. Brewster, the insured and a member of the Society. The trial court sustained this contention and instructed a verdict against Patsy Allen, and judgment was rendered against her, denying her the right to collect the proceeds of such certificate. The judgment of the trial court was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals. 172 S.W.2d 192. We refer to the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals for a more detailed statement of the case. This Court granted a writ of error on the application of Patsy Allen.
In the recent case of Castillo v. Canales, 174 S.W.2d 251, this Court held contrary to the holding of the trial court and the Court of Civil Appeals in this case, and declared that the law governing fraternal benefit societies authorizes a member of such a society, with the society's consent, as evidenced by its law, to name in a benefit certificate whomsoever such member pleases to designate as beneficiary, regardless of whether the beneficiary has an insurable interest in such member's life. In that case the laws relating to this question are fully discussed, and we refer to such opinion for a full discussion of the reasons for the holding of this Court in that case. The decision in that case controls this case, and the trial court and the Court of Civil Appeals erred in holding that Patsy Allen was not entitled to recover under the certificate. Therefore the judgments of the trial court and the Court of Civil Appeals are hereby reversed, and judgment is here rendered in favor of Patsy Allen for the proceeds of the certificate.