Case Name: Johnny Calvin OLLIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Litonya CARTER; George Solomon; Karen Brown; Faye Daniels; Dale Attaway; Brenda Dixon; Magoleen Williams; Jermaine Hackney; Gary Palush, Defendants-Appellees, and Division of Adult Correction, Department of Public Safety, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-11-29
Citations: 671 F. App'x 107
Docket Number: No. 16-6997
Parties: Johnny Calvin OLLIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Litonya CARTER; George Solomon; Karen Brown; Faye Daniels; Dale Attaway; Brenda Dixon; Magoleen Williams; Jermaine Hackney; Gary Palush, Defendants-Appellees, and Division of Adult Correction, Department of Public Safety, Defendant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 671
Pages: 107–107

Head Matter:
Johnny Calvin OLLIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Litonya CARTER; George Solomon; Karen Brown; Faye Daniels; Dale Attaway; Brenda Dixon; Magoleen Williams; Jermaine Hackney; Gary Palush, Defendants-Appellees, and Division of Adult Correction, Department of Public Safety, Defendant.
No. 16-6997
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: November 22, 2016
Decided: November 29, 2016
Johnny Calvin Ollis, Appellant Pro Se. Vanessa N. Totten, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Ap-pellees.
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Johnny Calvin Ollis appeals the district court's order dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012), the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Rehabilitation Act, for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ollis v. Carter, No. 5:14-ct-03248-BO (E.D.N.C. July 14, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED