Case Name: Charles Henry STEINER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-12-27
Citations: 591 So. 2d 1070
Docket Number: No. 90-01378
Parties: Charles Henry STEINER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SCHEB, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND, J., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 591
Pages: 1070–1076

Head Matter:
Charles Henry STEINER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 90-01378.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Dec. 27, 1991.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Kevin Briggs, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
Charles Henry Steiner, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Patricia Ann Ash, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We reverse defendant's habitual offender sentence on the basis that the trial court erred by failing to make the supporting findings required by the habitual offender statute. Section 775.084(l)(a) 1-4, Fla.Stat. (1989); Roberts v. State, 559 So.2d 289, 290 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). Although the issues raised in the special concurrence are wor thy of thought, we decline to consider those issues at this time.
Reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent herewith.
SCHEB, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND, J., concur.
LEHAN, J., concurs specially.