Case Name: Kenneth SMITH, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Dan MURPHY d/b/a Bill and Dan's Transmission, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1996-05-14
Citations: 922 S.W.2d 54
Docket Number: No. 68694
Parties: Kenneth SMITH, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Dan MURPHY d/b/a Bill and Dan’s Transmission, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before CRANE, C.J., AHRENS, J. and HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, Special Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 922
Pages: 54–54

Head Matter:
Kenneth SMITH, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Dan MURPHY d/b/a Bill and Dan’s Transmission, Defendant/Appellant.
No. 68694.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
May 14, 1996.
Isadore Scher, St. Louis, for appellant.
Larry A. Bagsby, St. Charles, for respondent.
Before CRANE, C.J., AHRENS, J. and HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, Special Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The defendant, a repairman, appeals from a judgment in a court-tried action where the respondent alleged damages to his car, and the loss of use of his car caused by the defendant.
No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).