Case Name: Leroy Steven BRADLEY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1986-04-10
Citations: 485 So. 2d 1285
Docket Number: No. 67290
Parties: Leroy Steven BRADLEY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: BOYD, C.J., and ADKINS, OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW and BARKETT, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 485
Pages: 1285–1285

Head Matter:
Leroy Steven BRADLEY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 67290.
Supreme Court of Florida.
April 10, 1986.
Michael E. Allen, Public Defender and Paula S. Saunders, Asst. Public Defender, Second Judicial Circuit, Tallahassee, for petitioner.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and John M. Koe-nig, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for respondent.

Opinion:
McDONALD, Justice.
We take jurisdiction of this case pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4), Florida Constitution, because the district court certified the following quéstion to be of great public importance:
WHEN A DEFENDANT WHO COMMITTED A CRIME BEFORE OCTOBER 1, 1983 AFFIRMATIVELY SELECTS SENTENCING PURSUANT TO THE SENTENCING GUIDELINES, MUST THE RECORD SHOW THE DEFENDANT KNOWINGLY AND INTELLIGENTLY WAIVED THE RIGHT TO PAROLE ELIGIBILITY?
Bradley v. State, 468 So.2d 378, 380 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). The question is identical to the certified question that we answered in the negative in Cochran v. State, 476 So.2d 207 (Fla.1985), and Gage v. State, 480 So.2d 1291 (Fla.1985). Accordingly, we answer the certified question in the negative and approve the opinion of the district court. It is so ordered.
BOYD, C.J., and ADKINS, OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW and BARKETT, JJ., concur.