Case Name: PHILIP TRAFICONDA v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1998-03-31
Citations: 48 Conn. App. 909
Docket Number: AC 16947
Parties: PHILIP TRAFICONDA v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Appellate Reports
Volume: 48
Pages: 909–909

Head Matter:
PHILIP TRAFICONDA v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION
(AC 16947)
Foti, Lavery and Spear, Js.
Argued March 16
officially released March 31, 1998

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying the petitioner certification to appeal. We find that the petitioner did not meet his burden of showing that there was a clear abuse of discretion or that an injustice was done. See Simms v. Warden, 230 Conn. 608, 646 A.2d 126 (1994); Stovall v. Commissioner of Correction, 43 Conn. App. 552, 684 A.2d 731 (1996), cert. denied, 239 Conn. 958, 688 A.2d 329 (1997).
The appeal is dismissed.