Case Name: Nadine BATCHELOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Northrop GRUMMAN, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-10-23
Citations: 297 F. App'x 223
Docket Number: No. 08-1491
Parties: Nadine BATCHELOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Northrop GRUMMAN, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 297
Pages: 223–224

Head Matter:
Nadine BATCHELOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Northrop GRUMMAN, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 08-1491.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 21, 2008.
Decided: Oct. 23, 2008.
Nadine Batchelor, Appellant Pro Se. James Joseph Kelley, II, Charys F. Scot-ton, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP, Washington, DC, for Appellee.
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Nadine Batchelor appeals the district court's order denying her motion for reconsideration of the court's memorandum and order dismissing her employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Batchelor v. Northrop, No. 1:07-cv-01032-WMN (D.Md. Apr. 3, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.