Case Name: JOHN HRABAR, TRADING AS THE ROOST, APPELLANT, v. ERWIN B. HOCK, DIRECTOR OF THE DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL, ET AL., RESPONDENTS
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1949-10-06
Citations: 5 N.J. Super. 162
Docket Number: 
Parties: JOHN HRABAR, TRADING AS THE ROOST, APPELLANT, v. ERWIN B. HOCK, DIRECTOR OF THE DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL, ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 5
Pages: 162–163

Head Matter:
JOHN HRABAR, TRADING AS THE ROOST, APPELLANT, v. ERWIN B. HOCK, DIRECTOR OF THE DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL, ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued September 26, 1949
Decided October 6, 1949.
Before Judges McGeehan, Colie and Eastwood.
Mr. Arthur J. Sills argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Jacob L. Triarsi, attorney).
Mr. Anthony Meyer, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, argued tlie cause for respondent, Iiock.
Mr. Julius B. Pollatschek argued the cause for Union County Eetail Liquor Stores Association.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This appeal is from an order of the Director of the Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control reversing the action of the Municipal Board of Alcoholic Beverage Control in granting "broad package privileges" to appellant.
So far as the legal questions involved are concerned, they do not differ from and are controlled by our decision in Coral Lounge and Cocktail Bar, Inc., v. Hock, 5 N. J. Super. 163.
As to the factual situation, the so-called package department was separated from the barroom by a partition four feet or waist high which was insufficient, in the judgment of the Director, to make the package department "a portion of the licensed premises other than a public barroom." In that finding we concur.
The order under appeal is affirmed.