Case Name: Thomas R. MANION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-04-02
Citations: 272 F. App'x 779
Docket Number: No. 07-15314
Parties: Thomas R. MANION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 272
Pages: 779–780

Head Matter:
Thomas R. MANION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 07-15314
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
April 2, 2008.
Bruce Edward Committe, Pensacola, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Scott T. Dickens, Fultz Maddox Hovious & Dickens, PLC, Louisville, KY, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before MARCUS, WILSON and COX, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The sole issue on this appeal is the propriety of the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the Defendant. Having carefully considered the briefs and relevant parts of the record, we conclude that the court properly granted General Electric Company's motion for summary judgment. The content, placement, and presentation of the warnings it provided were adequate to place the Plaintiff on notice that his range could tip if the anti-tip device was not properly installed.
AFFIRMED.