Case Name: C. EDWARD MYERS COMPANY, RESPONDENT, v. THE TOWN OF BOONTON, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1924-10-20
Citations: 100 N.J.L. 406
Docket Number: 
Parties: C. EDWARD MYERS COMPANY, RESPONDENT, v. THE TOWN OF BOONTON, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 100
Pages: 406–406

Head Matter:
C. EDWARD MYERS COMPANY, RESPONDENT, v. THE TOWN OF BOONTON, APPELLANT.
Submitted June 6, 1924
Decided October 20, 1924.
For the appellant, S. G. Garrison.
For the respondent, Philip Goodell.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Neither after consideration of the facts, nor of the law involved in this case, are we disposed to disturb the judgment appealed from; for, as was sagely remarked by Lord Coke, "ubi eadem ratio ibi idem jus." Co. Litt. 10a; Ippollilo v. Ridgefield, 94 N. J. L. 97; Headley v. Cavelier, 82 N. J. L. 637; Jersey City Supply Co. v. Jersey City 71 Id. 631; Ocean Gily v. Shriver, 64 Id. 550.
The judgment will therefore be affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 16
For reversal — None.