Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Alberto Munoz VILLALON, also known as Jose A. Munoz, also known as Jose Alberto Munoz, also known as Jose Alberton Munoz-Villalon, also known as Jose Munoz, also known as Jose Abberto Munoz Villalon, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-11-29
Citations: 452 F. App'x 494
Docket Number: No. 11-20214
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Alberto Munoz VILLALON, also known as Jose A. Munoz, also known as Jose Alberto Munoz, also known as Jose Alberton Munoz-Villalon, also known as Jose Munoz, also known as Jose Abberto Munoz Villalon, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before BENAVIDES, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 452
Pages: 494–494

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Alberto Munoz VILLALON, also known as Jose A. Munoz, also known as Jose Alberto Munoz, also known as Jose Alberton Munoz-Villalon, also known as Jose Munoz, also known as Jose Abberto Munoz Villalon, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-20214
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Nov. 29, 2011.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Lourdes Rodriguez, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before BENAVIDES, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Jose Alberto Munoz Villalon (Munoz) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Munoz has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Munoz's response. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.