Case Name: George Randolph SUTTON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. MEMMELAAR, Lieutenant, SBI Drug Detective; Mike K. Horstman, SBI Drug Detective; Jerry Mozingo, IRS State Official; C.B. Vickory, District Attorney, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-05-19
Citations: 180 F. App'x 471
Docket Number: No. 05-7707
Parties: George Randolph SUTTON, Jr., Plaintiff—Appellant, v. J. MEMMELAAR, Lieutenant, SBI Drug Detective; Mike K. Horstman, SBI Drug Detective; Jerry Mozingo, IRS State Official; C.B. Vickory, District Attorney, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 180
Pages: 471–471

Head Matter:
George Randolph SUTTON, Jr., Plaintiff—Appellant, v. J. MEMMELAAR, Lieutenant, SBI Drug Detective; Mike K. Horstman, SBI Drug Detective; Jerry Mozingo, IRS State Official; C.B. Vickory, District Attorney, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 05-7707.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 16, 2006.
Decided: May 19, 2006.
George Randolph Sutton, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
George Sutton, Jr. appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying his subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm both orders for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sutton v. Memmelaar, No. 5:05-CT-257-BO (W.D.N.C. Sept. 22, 2005); Sutton v. Memmelaar, No. 5:05-CT-257-BO (W.D.N.C. June 9, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED