Case Name: S. & J. MERCURY CAB and Columbia Casualty Company, Petitioners, v. Nathan EIBISTER and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents; Nathan EIBISTER et al., Cross-Petitioners, v. S & J MERCURY CAB et al., Cross-Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1964-05-27
Citations: 168 So. 2d 136
Docket Number: Nos. 33140, 33230
Parties: S. & J. MERCURY CAB and Columbia Casualty Company, Petitioners, v. Nathan EIBISTER and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents. Nathan EIBISTER et al., Cross-Petitioners, v. S & J MERCURY CAB et al., Cross-Respondents.
Judges: DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 168
Pages: 136–137

Head Matter:
S. & J. MERCURY CAB and Columbia Casualty Company, Petitioners, v. Nathan EIBISTER and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents. Nathan EIBISTER et al., Cross-Petitioners, v. S & J MERCURY CAB et al., Cross-Respondents.
Nos. 33140, 33230.
Supreme Court of Florida.
May 27, 1964.
On Rehearing Oct. 21, 1964.
Knight, Smith, Underwood & Peters and Joseph V. Niemoeller, Miami, for petitioners and cross-respondents.
Richard A. Sicking and Kaplan, Ser, Abrams & O’Malley, Miami, for Nathan Eibister.
Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Gamer, Lakeland, for Florida Industrial Commission.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari and cross petition for certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date October 25, 1963.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition and cross-petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition and cross-petition are therefore denied.
DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.