Case Name: Eliah Kantrovitz, Appellant, v. Jacob Slaff and Louis Ginsburg, Doing Business as Slaff & Ginsburg, Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1922-05
Citations: 202 A.D. 759
Docket Number: 
Parties: Eliah Kantrovitz, Appellant, v. Jacob Slaff and Louis Ginsburg, Doing Business as Slaff & Ginsburg, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 202
Pages: 759–759

Head Matter:
Eliah Kantrovitz, Appellant, v. Jacob Slaff and Louis Ginsburg, Doing Business as Slaff & Ginsburg, Respondents.

Opinion:
Order of the County Court of Westchester county, setting aside verdict and granting new trial reversed on the law and the facts, and verdict unanimously reinstated, with costs. The ground for the order first stated by the learned trial judge that the verdict was for more than plaintiff demanded was not in accordance with the complaint or the statement prepared by defendants' counsel and submitted to the jury. We think an issue of fact was presented as to the validity of defendants' counterclaims, and that it cannot be said upon the record that the verdict was against the evidence. Blaekmar, P. J., Kelly, Manning, Kelby and Young, JJ., concur.