Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Marvis Charles BOX, also known as Charles Marvis Box, also known as Marvin Box, also known as Marvis C. Box, also known as Marvis Box, also known as Marvis Scooter, also known as Scooter Box, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-02-12
Citations: 633 F. App'x 281
Docket Number: No. 15-50355
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Marvis Charles BOX, also known as Charles Marvis Box, also known as Marvin Box, also known as Marvis C. Box, also known as Marvis Box, also known as Marvis Scooter, also known as Scooter Box, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 633
Pages: 281–281

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Marvis Charles BOX, also known as Charles Marvis Box, also known as Marvin Box, also known as Marvis C. Box, also known as Marvis Box, also known as Marvis Scooter, also known as Scooter Box, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-50355
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Feb. 12, 2016.
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marvis Charles Box, Seagoville, TX, pro se.
Before KING, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Marvis Charles Box has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Box has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.