Case Name: Arthur O. ARMSTRONG, Petitioner-Appellant, v. KOURY CORPORATION, Respondent-Appellee; Arthur O. Armstrong, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Koury Corporation, et al, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-05-17
Citations: 10 F. App'x 127
Docket Number: Nos. 01-1220, 01-1225
Parties: Arthur O. ARMSTRONG, Petitioner-Appellant, v. KOURY CORPORATION, Respondent-Appellee. Arthur O. Armstrong, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Koury Corporation, et al, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 10
Pages: 127–127

Head Matter:
Arthur O. ARMSTRONG, Petitioner-Appellant, v. KOURY CORPORATION, Respondent-Appellee. Arthur O. Armstrong, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Koury Corporation, et al, Defendants-Appellees.
Nos. 01-1220, 01-1225.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 3, 2001.
Decided May 17, 2001.
Arthur O. Armstrong, pro se.
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In these consolidated appeals, Arthur O. Armstrong appeals district court orders dismissing his motions for leave to file lawsuits. We have reviewed the record and the district court orders and find no error. Accordingly, we deny Armstrong's motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeals as frivolous. We further deny Armstrong's motions for summary judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.