Case Name: Fred Simoncini, Appellant, v. Village of Red Hook et al., Respondents. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent; In the Matter of the Claim of Florence J. Furino, Appellant, v. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1962-05-04
Citations: 16 A.D.2d 853
Docket Number: 
Parties: (A) Fred Simoncini, Appellant, v. Village of Red Hook et al., Respondents. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent. (B) In the Matter of the Claim of Florence J. Furino, Appellant, v. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 16
Pages: 853–853

Head Matter:
(A) Fred Simoncini, Appellant, v. Village of Red Hook et al., Respondents. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent. (B) In the Matter of the Claim of Florence J. Furino, Appellant, v. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Opinion:
[In each action] Permission to prosecute appeals as poor persons granted. Appeals may be perfected upon one typewritten copy of the records and five typewritten copies of the briefs. Present — Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ.