Case Name: WILLIAM MILLS ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. JOHN BAIZLEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1895-03
Citations: 57 N.J.L. 711
Docket Number: 
Parties: WILLIAM MILLS ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. JOHN BAIZLEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 57
Pages: 711–712

Head Matter:
WILLIAM MILLS ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. JOHN BAIZLEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
On error to the Supreme Court.
For the plaintiff in error, Thomas B. Harned and John J. Crandall.
For the defendant in error, Edward Ambler Armstrong.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given by that court.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Gummere, Magie, Réed, Yan Syckel, Sims; 6.
For reversal — Dixon, Lippincott, Bogert, Brown. 4.