Case Name: UNITED FRUIT CO. et al. v. STEELE et al.; CAMORS et al. v. SAME; STEELE et al. v. UNITED FRUIT CO. et al.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1912-04-09
Citations: 194 F. 1023
Docket Number: No. 2,298
Parties: UNITED FRUIT CO. et al. v. STEELE et al. CAMORS et al. v. SAME. STEELE et al. v. UNITED FRUIT CO. et al.
Judges: Before McCORMICK and SHELBY, Circuit Judges, and MAXEY, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter
Volume: 194
Pages: 1023–1023

Head Matter:
UNITED FRUIT CO. et al. v. STEELE et al. CAMORS et al. v. SAME. STEELE et al. v. UNITED FRUIT CO. et al.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 9, 1912.)
No. 2,298.
Appeals and Cross-Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana.
Wm. C. Dufour and H. G. Dufour, for Charles and Jacob Weinberger.
Abraham Goldberg, for Bluefields Steamship Co., A. B. Orr, S. H. Baker, and Victor Camors.
Charles Payne Fenner and W. B. Spencer, for United Fruit Co.
J. Blanc Monroe, Monte M. Lemann, and Chas. J. Theard, for Frederick Camors and George Rueff.
Ernest Dale Owen, W. D. Hughes, J. D. Rouse, Wm. Grant, W. B. Grant, and Henry P. Dart, for Frederick M. Steele and others.
Before McCORMICK and SHELBY, Circuit Judges, and MAXEY, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This cause has been twice argued orally, and has been fully considered, with the aid of elaborate and exhaustive briefs. We have all reached the conclusion that there is no reversible error shown by the record, and that the conclusions of the lower court are sustained by the evidence. The decrees appealed from are therefore affirmed, both on the appeals and the cross-appeal. The appellants are taxed with the costs of the appeals, and the cross-appellants with the costs of the cross-appeal. Affirmed.