Case Name: Louis CALIAGARIS, d/b/a Italian Gardens, and Insurance Company of North America, Petitioners, Cross-Respondents, v. Annie Pearl HORODECZKI, the Town House Motor Inn, La Concha Hotel Corporation, Commercial Insurance Company of Newark, and the Florida Industrial Commission, an Administrative Agency, Respondents, Cross-Petitioners
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1969-04-23
Citations: 222 So. 2d 193
Docket Number: No. 38254
Parties: Louis CALIAGARIS, d/b/a Italian Gardens, and Insurance Company of North America, Petitioners, Cross-Respondents, v. Annie Pearl HORODECZKI, the Town House Motor Inn, La Concha Hotel Corporation, Commercial Insurance Company of Newark, and the Florida Industrial Commission, an Administrative Agency, Respondents, Cross-Petitioners.
Judges: ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 222
Pages: 193–194

Head Matter:
Louis CALIAGARIS, d/b/a Italian Gardens, and Insurance Company of North America, Petitioners, Cross-Respondents, v. Annie Pearl HORODECZKI, the Town House Motor Inn, La Concha Hotel Corporation, Commercial Insurance Company of Newark, and the Florida Industrial Commission, an Administrative Agency, Respondents, Cross-Petitioners.
No. 38254.
Supreme Court of Florida.
April 23, 1969.
Rehearing Denied May 26, 1969.
Summers Warden, Miami, for petitioners, cross-respondents.
Lally, Miller & Hodges, Miami, for respondents, cross-petitioners.
Patrick H. Mears and J. Franklin Garner, Tallahassee, for Florida Industrial Commission, -respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition and cross-petition for a writ of certiorari, we have for review an Order of the Florida Industrial Commission entered January 7, 1969.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dis pensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition and cross-petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition and cross-petition are, therefore, denied.
ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.