Case Name: Jacqueline SOLOMON, Appellant, v. Ronald SOLOMON, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-12-13
Citations: 773 So. 2d 1229
Docket Number: No. 3D00-1584
Parties: Jacqueline SOLOMON, Appellant, v. Ronald SOLOMON, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and SHEVIN and SORONDO, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 773
Pages: 1229–1229

Head Matter:
Jacqueline SOLOMON, Appellant, v. Ronald SOLOMON, Appellee.
No. 3D00-1584.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 13, 2000.
Greenspoon, Marder, Hirshfeld, Rafkin, Ross & Berger and Richard W. Epstein, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
Frederick C. Sake, Miami Beach, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and SHEVIN and SORONDO, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court's order insofar as it correctly ruled that Jacqueline Solomon is not entitled to a second judgment against debtor Ronald Solomon based on the same $500,000 obligation. However, this affirmance is without prejudice to Jacqueline Solomon's right to proceed against mortgagor Mortimer Solomon to foreclose on the mortgage based on Ronald Solomon's failure to remit payments pursuant to the promissory note.
Affirmed.