Case Name: Alejandro ISAZA, a minor, by and through his father and next friend, Bill Isaza, Bill Isaza, Individually, and Maria Isaza, Appellants, v. Dr. Sanford YANKOW, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1978-05-09
Citations: 358 So. 2d 1133
Docket Number: No. 77-283
Parties: Alejandro ISAZA, a minor, by and through his father and next friend, Bill Isaza, Bill Isaza, Individually, and Maria Isaza, Appellants, v. Dr. Sanford YANKOW, Appellee.
Judges: Before HUBBART and KEHOE, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 358
Pages: 1133–1133

Head Matter:
Alejandro ISAZA, a minor, by and through his father and next friend, Bill Isaza, Bill Isaza, Individually, and Maria Isaza, Appellants, v. Dr. Sanford YANKOW, Appellee.
No. 77-283.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 9, 1978.
Rehearing Denied June 9, 1978.
Horton, Perse & Ginsberg, Cohen & Ko-kus, Miami, for appellants.
Preddy, Kutner & Hardy, Joe N. Unger, Miami, for appellee.
Before HUBBART and KEHOE, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This appeal is by the plaintiffs below from an adverse judgment entered on a jury verdict in a medical malpractice action.
Appellants contend the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict, and that the court erred in striking portions of the deposition of an expert witness for plaintiffs. On consideration thereof in light of the record, briefs and argument we hold no reversible error has been shown. The challenged evidentiary ruling did not constitute harmful error. It was the province of the jury to resolve the conflicts in the evidence, and there was substantial competent evidence to justify and support the verdict and judgment. See: Anderson v. Gordon, 334 So.2d 107 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).
The judgment is affirmed.