Case Name: In the Interest of D.A.E., a minor. Juvenile Officer of the City of St. Louis, Petitioner/Respondent, v. J.E., Respondent/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2011-03-15
Citations: 333 S.W.3d 537
Docket Number: No. ED 95435
Parties: In the Interest of D.A.E., a minor. Juvenile Officer of the City of St. Louis, Petitioner/Respondent, v. J.E., Respondent/Appellant.
Judges: Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 333
Pages: 537–538

Head Matter:
In the Interest of D.A.E., a minor. Juvenile Officer of the City of St. Louis, Petitioner/Respondent, v. J.E., Respondent/Appellant.
No. ED 95435.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
March 15, 2011.
Alice A. O’Keefe, Clayton, MO, for appellant.
Margaret E. Gangle, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Diarra Cross-Davis, St. Louis, MO, Guardian Ad Litem.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Father appeals from the judgment of the trial court terminating his parental rights to his minor child. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).