Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Kevin James, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2016-11-29
Citations: 144 A.D.3d 596
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kevin James, Appellant.
Judges: Concur—Renwick, J.R, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels and Fein-man, JJ.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 144
Pages: 596–596

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kevin James, Appellant.
[41 NYS3d 418]—

Opinion:
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Angela M. Mazzarelli, J., at plea; Richard M. Weinberg, J., at sentencing), rendered June 13, 2013, convicting defendant of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of four months, unanimously affirmed.
The sentencing court properly exercised its discretion when it declined to adjudicate defendant a youthful offender (YO) (see generally People v Drayton, 39 NY2d 580 [1976]). At the time of defendant's guilty plea in 1990, the court promised YO treatment and probation on the conditions that defendant return for sentencing and avoid additional arrests. However, defendant absconded, was convicted of a felony and numerous other offenses in another state, and did not return for sentencing until approximately 22 years after the plea. Because defendant violated the plea conditions, the plea court's promise of YO treatment was no longer in effect, and the sentencing court's initial statement, made before receiving and considering an updated presentence report, that it was still inclined to grant YO treatment did not constitute an enforceable promise.
Concur—Renwick, J.R, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels and Fein-man, JJ.