Case Name: STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Steven Duane EVANS, Defendant and Appellant
Court: North Dakota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: North Dakota
Decision Date: 2018-01-22
Citations: 905 N.W.2d 738
Docket Number: No. 20170274
Parties: STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Steven Duane EVANS, Defendant and Appellant
Judges: [¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C. J.
Reporter: North Western Reporter 2d
Volume: 905
Pages: 738–739

Head Matter:
2018 ND 7
STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Steven Duane EVANS, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20170274
Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Filed 1/22/2018
Rehearing Denied Feb. 22, 2018
Julie A. Lawyer, Assistant State’s Attorney, Bismarck, N.D., for plaintiff and ap-pellee.
Steven D. Evans, defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
[¶ 1] Steven Evans appeals from a district court's order denying his motion for recalculation of credit for time served. Evans argues he is entitled to an additional 379 days credit for time served, the time between the date of his arrest, until the date he was sentenced. During this same period, Evans' probation on an unrelated case was revoked and he was resentenced to a period of incarceration. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7), concluding Evans is only entitled to credit for time served between the date he was arrested and the date he began serving time for his probation revocation. Gust v. State, 2006 ND 114, 714 N.W.2d 826 (concluding the defendant was properly credited time served from the date of the arrest until he began serving time for a parole revocation); State v. Eugene, 340 N.W.2d 18 (N.D. 1983) (concluding the defendant was only entitled to credit for time served from incarceration as a direct result of the im mediate charge and not for time served as a result of probation revocation).
[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C. J.
Lisa Fair McEvers
Jon J. Jensen
Jerod E. Tufte
Daniel J. Crothers