Case Name: Merchants Bank of New York, Respondent, v. Abraham Friedman Co. et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1994-07-28
Citations: 206 A.D.2d 333
Docket Number: 
Parties: Merchants Bank of New York, Respondent, v Abraham Friedman Co. et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 206
Pages: 333–333

Head Matter:
Merchants Bank of New York, Respondent, v Abraham Friedman Co. et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.
[615 NYS2d 271]

Opinion:
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Myriam Altman, J.), entered November 20, 1992, which granted, inter alia, partial summary judgment on a promissory note, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The IAS Court properly determined that General Obligations Law § 15-301 (1) precludes oral modification of this integrated contract (see, Bank Leumi Trust Co. v D'Evori Intl., 163 AD2d 26, 30). In addition, the defendants have presented no evidence to support their bare assertions that the sale of the collateral was improper. Summary judgment was therefore warranted.
We have considered the defendants' additional arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur—Carro, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.