Case Name: Jovica PETROVIC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Warden Stephanie HOLLEMBEAK; Mr. Hiscocks, Assistant Warden; Captain Smith; Lieutenant Candalario; Lieutenant Rodenbaugh; Lieutenant Plucker; Lieutenant Moore; Lieutenant Wright; Unit Manager Unknown Gregory; Correctional Officer Coor; Officer Peele; Dr. Meredith Rosenthal, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-04-25
Citations: 686 F. App'x 165
Docket Number: No. 17-6234
Parties: Jovica PETROVIC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Warden Stephanie HOLLEMBEAK; Mr. Hiscocks, Assistant Warden; Captain Smith; Lieutenant Candalario; Lieutenant Rodenbaugh; Lieutenant Plucker; Lieutenant Moore; Lieutenant Wright; Unit Manager Unknown Gregory; Correctional Officer Coor; Officer Peele; Dr. Meredith Rosenthal, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 686
Pages: 165–166

Head Matter:
Jovica PETROVIC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Warden Stephanie HOLLEMBEAK; Mr. Hiscocks, Assistant Warden; Captain Smith; Lieutenant Candalario; Lieutenant Rodenbaugh; Lieutenant Plucker; Lieutenant Moore; Lieutenant Wright; Unit Manager Unknown Gregory; Correctional Officer Coor; Officer Peele; Dr. Meredith Rosenthal, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 17-6234
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 20, 2017
Decided: April 25, 2017
Jovica Petrovic, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jovica Petrovic seeks to appeal the district court's order entered after a preliminary' screening of Petrovic's complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Petrovic seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten tions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED