Case Name: Sergio Zamora SANCHEZ, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-09-17
Citations: 110 F. App'x 33
Docket Number: No. 02-71957; Agency No. A26-349-041
Parties: Sergio Zamora SANCHEZ, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 110
Pages: 33–33

Head Matter:
Sergio Zamora SANCHEZ, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 02-71957.
Agency No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 13, 2004.
Decided Sept. 17, 2004.
Walter Rafael Pineda, Esq., Law Office of Walter Rafael Pineda, Redwood City, CA, for Petitioner.
Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Nancy E. Friedman, Esq., Jeffrey J. Bernstein, Attorney, Office of Immigration Litigation Civil Division, Washington, DC, for Respondent
Before PREGERSON, T.G. NELSON, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Sergio Zamora-Sanchez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' summary affirmance without opinion of an immigration judge's removal order and denial of his application for cancellation of removal.
Zamora-Sanchez's contention that the BIA's streamlining regulations violates his right to due process is foreclosed by Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft, 350 F.3d 845, 849-52 (9th Cir.2003) (holding that the BIA's streamlining procedure does not violate an alien's due process rights).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.