Case Name: Travis R. BLACKMON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2007-03-13
Citations: 216 S.W.3d 260
Docket Number: No. WD 66835
Parties: Travis R. BLACKMON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before HOWARD, C.J., and ULRICH and SPINDEN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 216
Pages: 260–261

Head Matter:
Travis R. BLACKMON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 66835.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
March 13, 2007.
Susan L. Hogan, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Stephanie L. Wan, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before HOWARD, C.J., and ULRICH and SPINDEN, JJ.

Opinion:
Order
PER CURIAM.
Travis Blackmon argues that the trial court erred in overruling his Rule 29.15 motion because his trial counsel was ineffective for not adequately cross-examining the alleged victim to show that she was lying about the facts and circumstances of the charged incident. The extent of cross-examination is a matter of trial strategy and Blackmon was not prejudiced. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).