Case Name: Bryan WURTZBERGER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2011-12-27
Citations: 355 S.W.3d 568
Docket Number: No. ED 96119
Parties: Bryan WURTZBERGER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J. and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 355
Pages: 568–568

Head Matter:
Bryan WURTZBERGER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 96119.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Dec. 27, 2011.
N. Scott Rosenblum, Erin R. Griebel, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Jayne T. Woods, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J. and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Bryan Wurtzberger appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying Wurtzber-ger's motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).