Case Name: Gandy v. Pinkerton, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1907-10-07
Citations: 34 Pa. Super. 87
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 33
Parties: Gandy v. Pinkerton, Appellant.
Judges: Before Rice, P. J., Porter, Henderson, Morrison, Orladv, Head and Beaver, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania Superior Court Reports
Volume: 34
Pages: 87–88

Head Matter:
Gandy v. Pinkerton, Appellant.
October 7, 1907:
Argued Dec. 13, 1906.
Appeal, No. 33, Oct. T., 1906, hy defendant, from order of C. P. No. 1, Phila. Co., Dec. T., 1905, No. 860, making absolute rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in case of George S. Gandy v. William W. Pinkerton.
Before Rice, P. J., Porter, Henderson, Morrison, Orladv, Head and Beaver, JJ.
Affirmed.
Samuel P. Tull, for appellant.
W. P. Rambo, with him Ormond Rambo, for appellee.

Opinion:
Opinion by
Orlady, J.,
In an opinion filed tiiis day in Gandy v. Weckerly, ante, p. 79, the question involved in this case is disposed of, and inasmuch as the affidavit in that case is more adequate in its statement of the defense, it is not necessary to repeat what is therein said.
The judgment is affirmed.