Case Name: Irma FRANCO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2005-03-30
Citations: 897 So. 2d 550
Docket Number: No. 3D05-37
Parties: Irma FRANCO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before COPE, CORTIÑAS, and ROTHENBERG, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 897
Pages: 550–551

Head Matter:
Irma FRANCO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D05-37.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 30, 2005.
Kenneth P. Speiller, for appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Annette Lizardo, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before COPE, CORTIÑAS, and ROTHENBERG, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court's denial of the appellant's motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, because the allegation that the appellant was not advised of the immigration consequences of her plea was clearly refuted by the record. Nonomme v. State, 834 So.2d 963 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). Further, the trial court's summary denial was proper where the trial court attached the transcript of the plea colloquy and the rights waiver form to the order denying relief. See Oliver v. State, 691 So.2d 1126, 1127 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).
Affirmed.