Case Name: FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY COMPANY, a corporation, Appellant, v. Mary Jo VICK, a widow, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1964-02-25
Citations: 162 So. 2d 314
Docket Number: No. 63-226
Parties: FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY COMPANY, a corporation, Appellant, v. Mary Jo VICK, a widow, Appellee.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, C. J., and CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 162
Pages: 314–314

Head Matter:
FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY COMPANY, a corporation, Appellant, v. Mary Jo VICK, a widow, Appellee.
No. 63-226.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
Feb. 25, 1964.
Rehearing Denied April 15, 1964.
Bolles, Prunty, Martin & Goodwin and Kenneth L. Ryskamp, Miami, for appellant.
Frates, Fay & Floyd, Miami, for appellee.
Before BARKDULL, C. J., and CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellant railway company, the defendant below, has appealed from an adverse judgment based on a jury verdict in a case arising out of a railroad crossing collision between a train and an automobile. Appellant states and argues three points dealing with admission of evidence, one of which also concerns comments of counsel in argument to the jury. On consideration thereof in the light of the briefs and record we conclude that the case was fully and fairly tried, and no reversible error has been made to appear.
Affirmed.