Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. WILLIAM LEE SLUSHER, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1982-06-30
Citations: 58 Or. App. 69
Docket Number: No. 80-6-216, CA 19817
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. WILLIAM LEE SLUSHER, Appellant.
Judges: Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Thornton and Van Hoomissen, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 58
Pages: 69–70

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted December 14, 1981,
affirmed; remanded for resentencing June 30, 1982
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. WILLIAM LEE SLUSHER, Appellant.
(No. 80-6-216, CA 19817)
647 P2d 477
Ernest E. Estes, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.
Richard David Wasserman, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and William F. Gary, Solicitor General, Salem.
Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Thornton and Van Hoomissen, Judges.
PER CURIAM.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals his conviction for the crime of felony murder, ORS 163.115(l)(b), contending that his motion for judgment of acquittal should have been granted. He also contends that imposition of a 25-year mandatory minimum sentence was unconstitutional. We affirm the conviction and remand for resentencing.
It is unnecessary to analyze defendant's arguments in detail under his first assignment of error. Suffice it to say there was ample evidence from which the jury could find that the charge was proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
Defendant's second assignment of error is that he was unconstitutionally sentenced to mandatory life imprisonment with no possibility of parole for 25 years. Defendant is correct. State v. Shumway, 291 Or 153, 630 P2d 796 (1981).
Judgment affirmed; remanded for resentencing.