Case Name: HOLLINGSWORTH, Appellant, v. SPECTATOR CO., Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1900-07-17
Citations: 66 N.Y.S. 1133
Docket Number: No. 3
Parties: HOLLINGSWORTH, Appellant, v. SPECTATOR CO., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 66
Pages: 1133–1133

Head Matter:
HOLLINGSWORTH, Appellant, v. SPECTATOR CO., Respondent.
(No. 3.)
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
July 17, 1900.)
Action by John E. Hollingsworth against the Spectator Company. From an interlocutory judgment overruling plaintiff’s demurrer to paragraphs 3 and 7 of defendant’s answer, plaintiff appeals.
Affirmed.
Henry T. Fay, for appellant. Franklin Bartlett, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
For the reasons given in :he opinion in Hollingsworth v. Spectator Company (action No. 1, handed down herewith) 65 N. Y. Supp. 812, the interlocutory judgment should be affirmed, with costs.