Case Name: MARTINEZ v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1918-11-20
Citations: 207 S.W. 930
Docket Number: No. 5197
Parties: MARTINEZ v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 207
Pages: 930–930

Head Matter:
MARTINEZ v. STATE.
(No. 5197.)
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Nov. 20, 1918.
On Motion for Rehearing, Jan. 15, 1919.)
1. Criminal Law <0=1090(16) — Review— Necessity oe Statement oe Pacts — Bill oe Exceptions.
Where the only question suggested in the motion for a new trial is that the judgment is contrary to the law and the evidence, the same cannot be considered in the absence of a statement of facts; there being no bill of exceptions.
On Motion for Rehearing.
2. Criminal Law 3=742(1) — Credibility-Question eor Jury.
The credibility of witnesses is a question for the jury.
Appeal from District Court, El Paso County; W. D. Howe, Judge.
Daniel Martinez was convicted of violation of the Prohibition Law, and appeals.
Judgment affirmed.
J. B. Larazola and P. E. Gardner, both of El Paso, for appellant.
E. B. Hendricks, Asst. Atty. Gen,, for the State.

Opinion:
PRENDERGAST, J.
This is an appeal from a conviction for violation of the Prohibition Law. There is neither a statement of facts nor a bill of exceptions. The only question suggested in the motion for a new trial is that the judgment is contrary to the law and the evidence, which, of course, cannot be considered in the absence of a statement of facts.
The judgment is affirmed.