Case Name: Frances SISKOS, a Widow, Petitioner, v. Edwin BRITZ and Carol Britz, Husband and Wife, Bernard Gaul, Marlene A. Vrbanic, Charles E. Boggs, III, and Cheryl Kay Boggs, Husband and Wife, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2001-03-01
Citations: 564 Pa. 386
Docket Number: Petition No. 0522 W.D. Alloc. Dkt.2000
Parties: Frances SISKOS, a Widow, Petitioner, v. Edwin BRITZ and Carol Britz, Husband and Wife, Bernard Gaul, Marlene A. Vrbanic, Charles E. Boggs, III, and Cheryl Kay Boggs, Husband and Wife, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 564
Pages: 386–386

Head Matter:
768 A.2d 1078
Frances SISKOS, a Widow, Petitioner, v. Edwin BRITZ and Carol Britz, Husband and Wife, Bernard Gaul, Marlene A. Vrbanic, Charles E. Boggs, III, and Cheryl Kay Boggs, Husband and Wife, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
March 1, 2001.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
AND NOW, this 1st day of March, 2001, we GRANT this Petition for Allowance of Appeal limited to the following issue:
Did the Superior Court err in concluding that the trial court had subject matter jurisdiction- to determine who had title, pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 1061(b)(2), without first determining who had possession, pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 1061(b)(1), and therefore whether an ejectment action would lie?