Case Name: Garri SHTEIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, FSB, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-06-01
Citations: 97 F. App'x 458
Docket Number: No. 04-1119
Parties: Garri SHTEIN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, FSB, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 97
Pages: 458–458

Head Matter:
Garri SHTEIN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, FSB, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 04-1119.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 7, 2004.
Decided: June 1, 2004.
Garri Shtein, Appellant pro se.
Dennis Patrick McGlone, Todd Russell Chason, Gordon, Feinblatt, Rothman, Hoffberger & Hollander, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Garri Shtein appeals the magistrate judge's letter order dismissing his discrimination and conspiracy to invade privacy action with prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. See Shtein v. Bank of America, No. CA-03-1159-CBD (D.Md. Nov. 14, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).