Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edgar QUIAMBAO, aka Quimbao Edgar, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-07-31
Citations: 286 F. App'x 473
Docket Number: No. 06-50491
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edgar QUIAMBAO, aka Quimbao Edgar, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 286
Pages: 473–474

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edgar QUIAMBAO, aka Quimbao Edgar, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-50491.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 22, 2008.
Filed July 31, 2008.
Michael J. Raphael, Esq., David P. Kowal, Esq., USLA — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Benjamin L. Coleman, Esq., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: B. FLETCHER, THOMAS, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Edgar Quiambao appeals from the 15-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Quiambao contends that the district court plainly erred by imposing an above-Guidelines range sentence without providing reasonable notice of its intent to do so. Quiambao's contention fails as the district court did not plainly err in failing to provide notice before imposing the sentence. Sec Irizarry v. United States, — U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 2198, 2202-04, 171 L.Ed.2d 28 (2008).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.