Case Name: In re The Interest of J.A.R. and J.L.R., Children. Lenette RALSTON, Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1982-09-23
Citations: 419 So. 2d 780
Docket Number: No. AK-385
Parties: In re The Interest of J.A.R. and J.L.R., Children. Lenette RALSTON, Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, Appellee.
Judges: McCORD, BOOTH and WENTWORTH, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 419
Pages: 780–780

Head Matter:
In re The Interest of J.A.R. and J.L.R., Children. Lenette RALSTON, Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, Appellee.
No. AK-385.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Sept. 23, 1982.
James H. DeAtley, Gulf Breeze, for appellant Lenette Ralston.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Eric J. Taylor, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee Florida Dept, of Health and Rehabilitative Services.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from an order of the circuit court adjudicating two of appellant's minor children dependents. The sole issue which warrants summary discussion pertains to appellant's contention that the court erred in denying her motion to suppress photographs which were seized during a search conducted pursuant to a search warrant for a handgun. The basis of that denial was the court's conclusion that Florida's constitutionally embodied exclusionary rule does not apply in dependency proceedings. Although we recognize that the issue raised is one of first impression, it need not be resolved herein because we find that the search of which appellant complains was not an unreasonable one requiring invocation of the rule, if applicable. Accordingly, the order is affirmed.
McCORD, BOOTH and WENTWORTH, JJ., concur.