Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Imer ROSALES-HERNANDEZ, also known as Francisco Fuentes-Rosales, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-06-17
Citations: 573 F. App'x 334
Docket Number: No. 13—40928
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Imer ROSALES-HERNANDEZ, also known as Francisco Fuentes-Rosales, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING, HAYNES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 573
Pages: 334–335

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Imer ROSALES-HERNANDEZ, also known as Francisco Fuentes-Rosales, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13—40928
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
June 17, 2014.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Imer Rosales-Hernandez, Laredo, TX, pro se.
Before KING, HAYNES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Imer Rosales-Hernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Rosales-Hernandez has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Rosales-Hernandez's response. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. With respect to Rosales-Hernandez's request to be moved to a prison in California, this court does not have the authority to determine prisoner location. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.