Case Name: Herman P. MAESTAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2017-02-22
Citations: 212 So. 3d 391
Docket Number: No. 4D15-4774
Parties: Herman P. MAESTAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Levine, Klingensmith and Kuntz, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 212
Pages: 391–392

Head Matter:
Herman P. MAESTAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D15-4774
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
[February 22, 2017]
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Patrick B. Burke, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Don M. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We affirm the revocation of the appellant's probation as supported by competent evidence showing his willful and substantial violations. We also agree with the State's concession of error, and remand for entry of a written order specifying each condition of probation the appellant violated. See Oertel v. State, 82 So.3d 152, 157 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012); Robinson v. State, 74 So.3d 570, 572 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) ("Even though the record is clear, a formal, written order specifying each condition of probation violated must be entered in this case."); King v. State, 46 So.3d 1171, 1172 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).
Revocation affirmed, but remanded for entry of revocation order consistent with this opinion.
Levine, Klingensmith and Kuntz, JJ., concur.