Case Name: David DUVALL, Appellant Pro Se, v. Michael CALICOTT and James Maxey, Respondent Pro Se
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-10-15
Citations: 86 S.W.3d 475
Docket Number: No. WD 61032
Parties: David DUVALL, Appellant Pro Se, v. Michael CALICOTT and James Maxey, Respondent Pro Se.
Judges: Before PATRICIA A. BRECKENRIDGE, Presiding Judge, HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, Judge, and RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 86
Pages: 475–475

Head Matter:
David DUVALL, Appellant Pro Se, v. Michael CALICOTT and James Maxey, Respondent Pro Se.
No. WD 61032.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Oct. 15, 2002.
David Duvall, Columbia, pro se.
Michael Calicott, Moberly, pro se.
James Maxey, Holiday, pro se.
Before PATRICIA A. BRECKENRIDGE, Presiding Judge, HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, Judge, and RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
Appellant David Duvall ("Duvall") appeals the trial court's dismissal of his suit against respondents Michael Calicott and James Maxey. This dismissal was entered upon the trial court's finding that Duvall's suit was barred by the doctrine of res judicata.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no prec-edential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).