Case Name: William P. Cunningham et al., Appellants, v. The City of New York, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1906-05-08
Citations: 185 N.Y. 549
Docket Number: 
Parties: William P. Cunningham et al., Appellants, v. The City of New York, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 185
Pages: 549–550

Head Matter:
William P. Cunningham et al., Appellants, v. The City of New York, Respondent.
Cunningham v. City of New York, 103 App. Div. 610, affirmed.
(Argued April 20, 1906;
decided May 8, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 9, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upona dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Tidal Term in an action to recover damages alleged to have been caused by the wrongful acts of defendant in delaying the performance by plaintiff of work on a municipal contract.
Laflin G. Kellogg and Alfred C. Petté for appellants.
John J. Pelanyi Corporation Counsel (Theodore Connoly and Terence Farley of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Vann, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ. Not voting: Edward T. Barttlett, J. Absent: Haight, J.