Case Name: James HAIRSTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gerald McPEAK, Superintendent; Harold W. Clarke, Director; Marty Stallard, Director of Security, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-11-20
Citations: 622 F. App'x 298
Docket Number: No. 15-7066
Parties: James HAIRSTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gerald McPEAK, Superintendent; Harold W. Clarke, Director; Marty Stallard, Director of Security, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 622
Pages: 298–299

Head Matter:
James HAIRSTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gerald McPEAK, Superintendent; Harold W. Clarke, Director; Marty Stallard, Director of Security, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15-7066.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 17, 2015.
Decided: Nov. 20, 2015.
James Hairston, Appellant Pro Se.
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James Hairston appeals the district court's orders denying class certification, separating a jointly filed civil action into separate civil actions under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012), and dismissing Hairston's complaint without prejudice for failure to comply with the court's prior order to file an affidavit of his intent to proceed and other documents. We have reviewed the recoi'd and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hairston v. McPeak, No. 7:15-cv-00274-EKD-RSB (W.D.Va. June 3,2015; June 4,2015; June 5,2015; June 26, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.