Case Name: Bonnie R. IVERSON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Richard M. IVERSON, Defendant-Appellant; Bonnie R. IVERSON and Richard M. Iverson, Third Party Plaintiffs, v. AIRE-MASTER OF IDAHO TRUST, Sun River Trust, United Allied Financial Trust, Montrose Trust, Dryden Management Trust, Golden Triangle Management Trust, Mission Transport Trust, Third Party Defendants
Court: Idaho Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Idaho
Decision Date: 1995-10-10
Citations: 127 Idaho 631
Docket Number: No. 22168
Parties: Bonnie R. IVERSON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Richard M. IVERSON, Defendant-Appellant. Bonnie R. IVERSON and Richard M. Iverson, Third Party Plaintiffs, v. AIRE-MASTER OF IDAHO TRUST, Sun River Trust, United Allied Financial Trust, Montrose Trust, Dryden Management Trust, Golden Triangle Management Trust, Mission Transport Trust, Third Party Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Idaho Reports
Volume: 127
Pages: 631–632

Head Matter:
903 P.2d 1328
Bonnie R. IVERSON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Richard M. IVERSON, Defendant-Appellant. Bonnie R. IVERSON and Richard M. Iverson, Third Party Plaintiffs, v. AIRE-MASTER OF IDAHO TRUST, Sun River Trust, United Allied Financial Trust, Montrose Trust, Dryden Management Trust, Golden Triangle Management Trust, Mission Transport Trust, Third Party Defendants.
No. 22168.
Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, August 1995 Term.
Oct. 10, 1995.
Richard M. Iverson, pro se.
Bauer & French, Boise, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Richard M. Iverson has filed a Notice of Appeal from an order of the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District in and for the State of Idaho dismissing an appeal Mr. Iver-son had previously filed from the magistrate division, which added certain Trusts as third party defendants and held Mr. Iverson in contempt.
The district court found that the orders issued by the magistrate judge were not final appealable orders under Idaho Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 83(a) or Idaho Appellate Rules Rule 11(a)(4).
Mr. Iverson has neither sought nor obtained permission to appeal from any of the temporary or interlocutory orders of the magistrate or the district court judges.
The appeal of Richard M. Iverson is dismissed on the grounds and for the reason that it is an appeal from an interlocutory order and is not an appealable order pursuant to the Idaho Rules of Civil Procedure or the Idaho Appellate Rules.
Costs and attorneys fees are awarded to respondent on appeal.