Case Name: In the Matter of Glenwood TV, Inc., Appellant, v. Bruce C. Ratner, as Commissioner of the Department of Consumer Affairs of the City of New York, Respondent. (Action No. 1.); In the Matter of Charles TV, Inc., Appellant, v. Bruce C. Ratner, as Commissioner of the Department of Consumer Affairs of the City of New York, Respondent. (Action No. 2.)
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1985-05-28
Citations: 65 N.Y. 642
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Glenwood TV, Inc., Appellant, v Bruce C. Ratner, as Commissioner of the Department of Consumer Affairs of the City of New York, Respondent. (Action No. 1.) In the Matter of Charles TV, Inc., Appellant, v Bruce C. Ratner, as Commissioner of the Department of Consumer Affairs of the City of New York, Respondent. (Action No. 2.)
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 65
Pages: 642–645

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Glenwood TV, Inc., Appellant, v Bruce C. Ratner, as Commissioner of the Department of Consumer Affairs of the City of New York, Respondent. (Action No. 1.) In the Matter of Charles TV, Inc., Appellant, v Bruce C. Ratner, as Commissioner of the Department of Consumer Affairs of the City of New York, Respondent. (Action No. 2.)
Argued April 25, 1985;
decided May 28, 1985
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Ronald M. Kleinberg, Laurel J. Weinberg and Richard A. Finkel for appellants.
Frederick A. O. Schwarz, Jr., Corporation Counsel (David Drueding, Leonard Koerner and Judith Levitt of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in so much of the opinion by former Justice Vito J. Titone at the Appellate Division as deals with the constitutional issue (103 AD2d 322).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander. Taking no part: Judge Titone.