Case Name: Roland M. LOVVORN, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. The CITY OF CHATTANOOGA, TENNESSEE, et al., Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1988-08-03
Citations: 861 F.2d 1388
Docket Number: No. 86-6281
Parties: Roland M. LOVVORN, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. The CITY OF CHATTANOOGA, TENNESSEE, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: Before ENGEL, Chief Judge, LIVELY, KEITH, MERRITT, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, KRUPANSKY, WELLFORD, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 861
Pages: 1388–1388

Head Matter:
Roland M. LOVVORN, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. The CITY OF CHATTANOOGA, TENNESSEE, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
No. 86-6281.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Aug. 3, 1988.
Before ENGEL, Chief Judge, LIVELY, KEITH, MERRITT, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, KRUPANSKY, WELLFORD, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:
The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this Court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket as a pending appeal.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this Court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.
The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as practicable.