Case Name: OPERATION RESCUE, et al., Petitioners, v. WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER, INC., et al., Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1994-10-20
Citations: 644 So. 2d 86
Docket Number: No. 81905
Parties: OPERATION RESCUE, et al., Petitioners, v. WOMEN’S HEALTH CENTER, INC., et al., Respondents.
Judges: GRIMES, C.J, OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., and McDONALD, Senior Justice, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 644
Pages: 86–86

Head Matter:
OPERATION RESCUE, et al., Petitioners, v. WOMEN’S HEALTH CENTER, INC., et al., Respondents.
No. 81905.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Oct. 20, 1994.
Mathew D. Staver and Jeffery T. Kipi, Orlando, and John Tanner, Daytona Beach, for appellants.
Talbot D’Alemberte, Tallahassee, and Susan A. England, Fern Park, for appellees.
Talbot D’Alemberte, Tallahassee, amicus curiae for Planned Parenthood Federation, joined by Florida Abortion Council, Religious Coalition for Abortion Rights, Feminist Majority Foundation, Nat. Coalition of Abortion Providers, Nat. Abortion Federation, and Florida Ass’n of Women Lawyers.
Nikolas T. Kikas and Benjamin W. Bull, Tupelo, amicus curiae for American Family Ass’n, Inc.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Gerald B. Curington, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, amicus curiae.

Opinion:
ON REMAND
PER CURIAM.
We have Operation Rescue v. Women's Health Center, 626 So.2d 664 (Fla.1993), on remand from the United States Supreme Court.
This Court in Operation Rescue approved a trial court order enjoining Operation Rescue, Judy Madsen, and others from engaging in certain activities against Aware Woman Center for Choice in Melbourne, its patients, and staff. The United States Supreme Court in Madsen v. Women's Health Center, Inc., — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2516, 129 L.Ed.2d 593 (1994), affirmed in part and reversed in part our decision. The United States Supreme Court then remanded the case to this Court for proceedings not inconsistent with Madsen.
Accordingly, we now remand this ease to the trial court to amend its injunction to conform with the dictates of the United States Supreme Court.
It is so ordered.
GRIMES, C.J, OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., and McDONALD, Senior Justice, concur.