Case Name: Anthony SARKIS, et al., Appellants, v. Roy R. HEIMBURGER, et al., Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-02-01
Citations: 24 S.W.3d 738
Docket Number: No. ED 75523
Parties: Anthony SARKIS, et al., Appellants, v. Roy R. HEIMBURGER, et al., Respondents.
Judges: Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 24
Pages: 738–738

Head Matter:
Anthony SARKIS, et al., Appellants, v. Roy R. HEIMBURGER, et al., Respondents.
No. ED 75523.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Feb. 1, 2000.
Jeffrey J. Lowe, St. Louis, for appellants.
Richard A. Ahrens, St. Louis, for respondents.
Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Anthony Sarkis, et al, ("Plaintiffs") appeal from the trial court's dismissal of their petition against Roy Heimburger, et al., ("Defendants") for lack of standing.
We find that no error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(5).