Case Name: Douglas S. COCHRAN, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Don A. CHERRY, d/b/a Manor Real Estate Company, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-01-11
Citations: 155 S.W.3d 769
Docket Number: No. ED 84698
Parties: Douglas S. COCHRAN, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Don A. CHERRY, d/b/a Manor Real Estate Company, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 155
Pages: 769–770

Head Matter:
Douglas S. COCHRAN, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Don A. CHERRY, d/b/a Manor Real Estate Company, Defendant/Respondent.
No. ED 84698.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Jan. 11, 2005.
Eric Carl Mueller, Frederick Michael Switzer Ill-Co-Counsel, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Louis Glaser, St. Louis, MO, attorney for Don Cherry and Manor Real Estate Company
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Douglas S. Cochran (Appellant) appeals from the trial court's summary judgment in favor of Don A. Cherry, d/b/a Manor Real Estate Company (Respondent). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that Respondent is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on Appellant's claims against him. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for them use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).