Case Name: Lloyd E. WHITT, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CUPPLES PRODUCTS, H.H. Robertson Company, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-05-12
Citations: 967 S.W.2d 316
Docket Number: No. 73013
Parties: Lloyd E. WHITT, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CUPPLES PRODUCTS, H.H. Robertson Company, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before GRIMM, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 967
Pages: 316–316

Head Matter:
Lloyd E. WHITT, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CUPPLES PRODUCTS, H.H. Robertson Company, Defendant/Respondent.
No. 73013.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
May 12, 1998.
Harry J. Nichols, St. Louis, for plaintiff/appellant.
Maureen L. Cary, St. Louis, for defendant/respondent.
Before GRIMM, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
This is a workers' compensation case. Employee obtained an award from employer and the Second Injury Fund for a 1991 injury. Thereafter, employee sought to reopen the award against employer based on a change of medical condition. The Commission found it lacked subject matter jurisdiction and affirmed the administrative law judge's decision dismissing for lack of jurisdiction. Employee appeals.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).