Case Name: Dorothy BOYD, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellee, Inez Stoney, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee, v. The LEFRAK ORGANIZATION and Life Realty Inc., Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1975-04-17
Citations: 517 F.2d 918
Docket Number: No. 201, Docket 74-1660
Parties: Dorothy BOYD, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellee, Inez Stoney, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee, v. The LEFRAK ORGANIZATION and Life Realty Inc., Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 517
Pages: 918–919

Head Matter:
Dorothy BOYD, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellee, Inez Stoney, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee, v. The LEFRAK ORGANIZATION and Life Realty Inc., Defendants-Appellants.
No. 201, Docket 74-1660.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
April 17, 1975.

Opinion:
IRVING R. KAUFMAN, Chief Judge.
A petition for rehearing containing a suggestion that the action be reheard en banc having been filed herein by counsel for the Plaintiff-Appellees, a poll of the judges in regular active service having been taken at the request of such a judge, and Chief Judge Kaufman and Circuit Judges Feinberg, Mansfield and Oakes having voted to grant the petition, and Circuit Judges Mulligan, Timbers and Van Graafeiland having voted to deny the petition, and opinions having been filed by Chief Judge Kaufman and Circuit Judge Oakes, and Circuit Judge Gurfein being disqualified,
It is therefore,
Ordered that rehearing before the court en banc is denied for want of an affirmative vote "by a majority of the circuit judges of the circuit who are in regular active service."