Case Name: Christopher R. GUMMERE and Koreen L. Gummere, Appellants, v. Steven D. GRAY, Delores Gray, Lagrasso Trust, Mary Weindel, Rivercity Realty, Inc., Patricia Blazevich and Davis Properties West, Inc. d/b/a Re/Max Properties West, et al., Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-01-07
Citations: 98 S.W.3d 585
Docket Number: No. ED 80810
Parties: Christopher R. GUMMERE and Koreen L. Gummere, Appellants, v. Steven D. GRAY, Delores Gray, Lagrasso Trust, Mary Weindel, Rivercity Realty, Inc., Patricia Blazevich and Davis Properties West, Inc. d/b/a Re/Max Properties West, et al., Respondents.
Judges: Before MARY R. RUSSELL, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 98
Pages: 585–585

Head Matter:
Christopher R. GUMMERE and Koreen L. Gummere, Appellants, v. Steven D. GRAY, Delores Gray, Lagrasso Trust, Mary Weindel, Rivercity Realty, Inc., Patricia Blazevich and Davis Properties West, Inc. d/b/a Re/Max Properties West, et al., Respondents.
No. ED 80810.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Jan. 7, 2003.
Application for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Feb. 20, 2003.
Application for Transfer Denied April 1, 2003.
Ira M. Berkowitz, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Judith W. Freiberg, St. Louis, MO, Randall D. Sherman, co-counsel, Hillsboro, for Gray.
Jess W. Ullom, Timothy W. Jones, Chesterfield, MO, for Patricia Blazevich & Davis Properties West d/b/a Remax Properties West.
Alan J. Baker, St. Louis, MO, for Mary Weindel & River City Realty, Inc.
Stephen H. Gilmore, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before MARY R. RUSSELL, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Christopher R. Gummere and Koreen L. Gummere (collectively "Plaintiffs") appeal the trial court's judgment sustaining a motion for contempt and/or sanctions filed by Steven D. Gray, Delores Gray, Lagrasso Trust, Mary Weindel, Rivercity Realty, Inc., Patricia Blazevich and Davis Properties West, Inc. d/b/a Re/Max Properties West and dismissing Plaintiffs' third amended petition with prejudice. We find no error and affirm.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).