Case Name: J. H. Gunby et al. v. J. C. Culver, as Receiver, etc.
Court: Kansas Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Kansas
Decision Date: 1903-03-07
Citations: 66 Kan. 785
Docket Number: No. 13,006
Parties: J. H. Gunby et al. v. J. C. Culver, as Receiver, etc.
Judges: 
Reporter: Kansas Reports
Volume: 66
Pages: 785–786

Head Matter:
J. H. Gunby et al. v. J. C. Culver, as Receiver, etc.
No. 13,006.
(71 Pac. 1127.)
Error from Wilson district court; L. Stillwell, judge.
Opinion filed March 7, 1903.
Affirmed.
O. H. Lamb, and J. B. F. Oates, for plaintiffs in error.
Kirkpatrick c6 Holmes, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
The principal point in this case is whether
the advancement of money and the taking up of a note constituted a payment and extinguishment of the note or a purchase of the same. The testimony tended to show that the parties interested regarded the transaction as a purchase, and there were a number of circumstances supporting that theory. It was a question of fact submitted for the determination of the trial court, and its gen eral-finding appears to be sustained by sufficient evidence. The pleadings warranted the proof offered and the objection to the testimony is not deemed to be material.
The judgment is affirmed.