Case Name: In the Interest of Z. R. G., a child, and Harold Gilmer, father, Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, DIVISION OF FAMILY SERVICES, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1973-11-13
Citations: 284 So. 2d 708
Docket Number: No. T-335
Parties: In the Interest of Z. R. G., a child, and Harold Gilmer, father, Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, DIVISION OF FAMILY SERVICES, Appellee.
Judges: RAWLS, C. J. and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 284
Pages: 708–708

Head Matter:
In the Interest of Z. R. G., a child, and Harold Gilmer, father, Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, DIVISION OF FAMILY SERVICES, Appellee.
No. T-335.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nov. 13, 1973.
Conrad C. Bishop, Jr., Weed & Bishop, Perry, for appellants.
D. Stephen Kahn, Tallahassee, and Chester G. Senf, Jacksonville, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant seeks review of a final judgment declaring a child to be dependent and in need of supervision and placing the custody of said child in the Division of Family Services, appellee herein.
We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs of counsel filed herein, and upon consideration thereof, we are of the view that the final judgment is supported by the evidence adduced at the final hearing before the trial judge. While the evidence is in conflict as to the existence of facts justifying the ruling that the child is a dependent child and in need of supervision warranting the custody being placed in appellee, we are bound by the rule that the trial court has resolved the conflicts in the evidence in the performance of its fact-finding function. Accordingly, the judgment appealed herein is
Affirmed.
RAWLS, C. J. and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.