Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Llewellen Fernando SMITH, a/k/a Louie, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-03-17
Citations: 417 F. App'x 267
Docket Number: No. 09-6963
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Llewellen Fernando SMITH, a/k/a Louie, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 417
Pages: 267–268

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Llewellen Fernando SMITH, a/k/a Louie, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-6963.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 15, 2011.
Decided: March 17, 2011.
Llewellen Fernando Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Brian R. Hood, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Llewellen Fernando Smith appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Smith, No. 3:96-cr-00066-REP-20 (E.D.Va. May 6, 2009). We deny Smith's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.