Case Name: Tyrone HURT, Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-10-30
Citations: 204 F. App'x 898
Docket Number: No. 06-5277
Parties: Tyrone HURT, Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 204
Pages: 898–898

Head Matter:
Tyrone HURT, Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Appellees.
No. 06-5277.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Oct. 30, 2006.
Tyrone Hurt, Washington, DC, pro se.
R. Craig Lawrence, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Edward Eugene Schwab, Deputy Attorney General, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Washington, DC, for Defendants-Appellees.
BEFORE: GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and ROGERS and KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's order filed August 31, 2006, be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed the complaint sua sponte under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), because the allegations lack an arguable basis either in law or fact. See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325, 109 S.Ct. 1827, 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989); Crisafi v. Holland, 655 F.2d 1305 (D.C.Cir.1981).
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.