Case Name: Florida East Coast Railway Company, a Corporation, Plaintiff in Error, v. Charlotte Rattery, Defendant in Error
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1919-11-10
Citations: 78 Fla. 415
Docket Number: 
Parties: Florida East Coast Railway Company, a Corporation, Plaintiff in Error, v. Charlotte Rattery, Defendant in Error.
Judges: All concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 78
Pages: 415–415

Head Matter:
Florida East Coast Railway Company, a Corporation, Plaintiff in Error, v. Charlotte Rattery, Defendant in Error.
Decision filed November 10, 1919.
A Writ of Error to a Judgment, of the Circuit Court within and' for the County of Dade, H. Pierre Branning, Judge.
Shutts, Smith & Bowen, Scott M. Loftin and Armstead Brown, for Plaintiff in Error;
Taylor & Taylor, for Defendant in Error.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
— This cause having been submitted to the Court at a former term thereof upon the transcript of the record of the judgment afersaid, and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore,' considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said' judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is-hereby, affirmed.
All concur.