Case Name: METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, Appellant, v. Ana MARINO, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1988-06-21
Citations: 526 So. 2d 1050
Docket Number: No. 87-2512
Parties: METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, Appellant, v. Ana MARINO, Appellee.
Judges: Before HUBBART, NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 526
Pages: 1050–1050

Head Matter:
METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, Appellant, v. Ana MARINO, Appellee.
No. 87-2512.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
June 21, 1988.
Robert A. Ginsburg, Co. Atty., and Gary Siplin, Asst. Co. Atty., for appellant.
Friedman and Friedman, Miami Beach, Daniels and Hicks and Patrice A. Talisman, Miami, for appellee.
Before HUBBART, NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Concluding that the trial court's instruction to disregard the arguably inadmissible testimony sufficiently cured any prejudice that may have resulted from its admission, and that, therefore, a mistrial was not warranted, we affirm the judgment under review. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Guthrie, 321 So.2d 116 (Fla.3d DCA 1975); Compania Dominicana de Aviacion v. Knapp, 251 So.2d 18 (Fla.3d DCA 1971).
Affirmed.