Case Name: Merle D. GREENSTEIN, Petitioner on Review, v. MANUFACTURING MANAGEMENT, INC., Respondent on Review; MANUFACTURING MANAGEMENT, INC., Respondent on Review, v. Merle E. GREENSTEIN, Petitioner on Review
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1992-11-25
Citations: 314 Or. 687
Docket Number: CC 9106-03803; CA A76509; 9106-03508; CA A76510; SC S39679
Parties: Merle D. GREENSTEIN, Petitioner on Review, v. MANUFACTURING MANAGEMENT, INC., Respondent on Review. MANUFACTURING MANAGEMENT, INC., Respondent on Review, v. Merle E. GREENSTEIN, Petitioner on Review.
Judges: 
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 314
Pages: 687–687

Head Matter:
Submitted on petition for review October 8, petition for review allowed;
decisions of Court of Appeals vacated and cases remanded to Court of Appeals for further consideration November 25, 1992
Merle D. GREENSTEIN, Petitioner on Review, v. MANUFACTURING MANAGEMENT, INC., Respondent on Review. MANUFACTURING MANAGEMENT, INC., Respondent on Review, v. Merle E. GREENSTEIN, Petitioner on Review.
(CC 9106-03803; CA A76509)
(9106-03508; CA A76510)
(Consolidated Petition for Review)
(SC S39679)
840 P2d 1293
William Dickas, of Kell, Alterman & Runstein, Portland, filed the petition for petitioner on review.
No appearance contra.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The petition for review is allowed. The decisions of the Court of Appeals are vacated. The cases are remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in fight of the motions for reconsideration filed by petitioner on review.