Case Name: Yvonne PINKARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. S.L. NUSBAUM; Sykes, Bourdon, Ahern & Levy P.C.; Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority, NRHA, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-07-19
Citations: 693 F. App'x 206
Docket Number: No. 17-1182
Parties: Yvonne PINKARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. S.L. NUSBAUM; Sykes, Bourdon, Ahern & Levy P.C.; Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority, NRHA, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before SHEDD and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 693
Pages: 206–207

Head Matter:
Yvonne PINKARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. S.L. NUSBAUM; Sykes, Bourdon, Ahern & Levy P.C.; Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority, NRHA, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 17-1182
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 28, 2017
Decided: July 19, 2017
Yvonne Pinkard, Appellant Pro Se. James Thomas Cromwell, SYKES, BOUR-DON, AHERN & LEVY, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia; David Caldwell Hartnett, CRENSHAW WARE & MARTIN, PLC, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees,
Before SHEDD and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Yvonne Pinkard appeals the district court's order granting the Defendants' motions to dismiss and dismissing her complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pinkard v. S.L. Nusbaum, No. 2:16-cv-00625-RAJ-LRL (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 20, 2017 & entered Jan. 23, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED