Case Name: Adam BESTHOFF, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doctor ROSTAFINSKI, M.D.; MS. Caul, Work Release; Officer Agund, c/o; Mr. Heddinger; Counselor Syed; Sergeant McIntyre; Corporal Harreson, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-11-07
Citations: 205 F. App'x 108
Docket Number: No. 06-7221
Parties: Adam BESTHOFF, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doctor ROSTAFINSKI, M.D.; MS. Caul, Work Release; Officer Agund, c/o; Mr. Heddinger; Counselor Syed; Sergeant McIntyre; Corporal Harreson, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 205
Pages: 108–108

Head Matter:
Adam BESTHOFF, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doctor ROSTAFINSKI, M.D.; MS. Caul, Work Release; Officer Agund, c/o; Mr. Heddinger; Counselor Syed; Sergeant McIntyre; Corporal Harreson, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 06-7221.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 31, 2006.
Decided: Nov. 7, 2006.
Adam Besthoff, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Adam Besthoff appeals the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint because Besthoff failed to pay the initial partial filing fee. Because Besthoff may refile his suit and either pay the required fee or affirm he is unable, the dismissal order is interlocutory and not appealable. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir.1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.