Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Terrence Javance SHELBY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-02-11
Citations: 633 F. App'x 258
Docket Number: No. 15-10603
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Terrence Javance SHELBY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 633
Pages: 258–259

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Terrence Javance SHELBY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-10603
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Feb. 11, 2016.
James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Dallás, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
James Matthew Wright, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Amarillo, TX, Carly Elizabeth Barton, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Lubbock, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before KING, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Terrence Javance Shelby has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Shelby has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Shelby's claim of inef fective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir.2014).
We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Shelby's response. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4. 222