Case Name: T.P. CRIGLER; Najieh R. Crigler, Petitioners-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-01-14
Citations: 85 F. App'x 328
Docket Number: No. 03-1861
Parties: T.P. CRIGLER; Najieh R. Crigler, Petitioners—Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent—Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 85
Pages: 328–329

Head Matter:
T.P. CRIGLER; Najieh R. Crigler, Petitioners—Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent—Appellee.
No. 03-1861.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 19, 2003.
Decided Jan. 14, 2004.
T.P. Crigler and Najieh R. Crigler, Appellants pro se.
Steven Wesley Parks, Jonathan Samuel Cohen, John A. Nolet, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
T.P. Crigler and Najieh R. Crigler appeal from the tax court's order upholding the Commissioner's determination of a deficiency in their income taxes for the 1995 tax year and imposing an accuracy-related penalty. We have reviewed the record and the tax court's memorandum and opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. See Crigler v. Comm'r, IRS, No. 99-9233 (U.S. Tax Ct. May 13, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED