Case Name: Carlos HOOKS, Employee/Appellant, v. HOLIDAY INN, Employer/Respondent, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-09-04
Citations: 380 S.W.3d 583
Docket Number: No. ED 97735
Parties: Carlos HOOKS, Employee/Appellant, v. HOLIDAY INN, Employer/Respondent, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., C.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 380
Pages: 583–583

Head Matter:
Carlos HOOKS, Employee/Appellant, v. HOLIDAY INN, Employer/Respondent, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent.
No. ED 97735.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Sept. 4, 2012.
John J. Ammann, St. Louis University Legal Clinic, St. Louis, MO, for appellant Carlos Hooks.
Larry Raymond Ruhmann, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent Division of Employment Security.
Teresa Michelle Young, Brown & James, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for respondent Holiday Inn.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., C.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
Carlos Hooks appeals from the Order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) finding that he is ineligible for unemployment benefits because he was discharged from his employment with Holiday Inn for misconduct connected with work. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. The Commission's decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).