Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Javier QUESADA-RIOS, also known as Javier Quezada-Rios, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-07-13
Citations: 609 F. App'x 246
Docket Number: No. 14-51317
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Javier QUESADA-RIOS, also known as Javier Quezada-Rios, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before PRADO, OWEN and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 609
Pages: 246–247

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Javier QUESADA-RIOS, also known as Javier Quezada-Rios, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 14-51317
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
July 13, 2015.
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Judy Fulmer Madewell, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Maureen Scott Franco, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before PRADO, OWEN and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Javier Quesada-Rios has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Counsel also has implicitly moved to supplement the record with copies of adjudicative documents regarding Quesada-Rios's prior state conviction. Quesada-Rios has filed a response and has moved for the appointment of new counsel. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Quesada-Rios's response. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Therefore, counsel's implied motion for leave to supplement the record and motion for leave to withdraw are GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, Quesada-Rios's motion for appointment of new counsel is DENIED, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.