Case Name: Richard POLIDI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR; John Does 1-5; Jane Does 1-5, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-07-24
Citations: 693 F. App'x 226
Docket Number: No. 17-1001
Parties: Richard POLIDI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR; John Does 1-5; Jane Does 1-5, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 693
Pages: 226–227

Head Matter:
Richard POLIDI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR; John Does 1-5; Jane Does 1-5, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 17-1001
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 20, 2017
Decided: July 24, 2017
Richard Polidi, Appellant Pro Se.
Before DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Richard Polidi appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his civil complaint and denying his Motion for a New Hearing. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Polidi v. North Carolina State Bar, No. 1:16-cv-01322-TSE-IDD (E.D. Va. Oct. 31, 2016; Nov. 30, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED