Case Name: Annie Yanolatos et al., Appellants, v. Howard Rotterman, Respondent, et al., Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1961-06-08
Citations: 13 A.D.2d 917
Docket Number: 
Parties: Annie Yanolatos et al., Appellants, v. Howard Rotterman, Respondent, et al., Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 13
Pages: 917–917

Head Matter:
Annie Yanolatos et al., Appellants, v. Howard Rotterman, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

Opinion:
Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and on the facts, with costs to appellants Annie Yanolatos and David Yanolatos, their actions severed and a new trial ordered as to such appellants unless respondent stipulates to increase the verdict in favor of Annie Yanolatos to $25,000 and the verdict in favor of David Yanolatos to $2,500, in which event the judgment, as so modified, is affirmed, with costs to said plaintiffs-appellants. On the record before us, the verdicts in favor of appellants Annie Yanolatos and David Yanolatos are grossly inadequate and should not have been less than $25,000 for Annie Yanolatos and $2,500 for David Yanolatos. The judgment in favor of plaintiff Elizabeth Yanalatos is unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondent. Settle order on notice. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.