Case Name: William GILLARD, Respondent v. AIG INSURANCE COMPANY and AIG and the Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania and Key Auto Insurance Plan and AIG Claims Services, Petitioner
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2010-03-16
Citations: 990 A.2d 1147
Docket Number: 
Parties: William GILLARD, Respondent v. AIG INSURANCE COMPANY and AIG and the Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania and Key Auto Insurance Plan and AIG Claims Services, Petitioner.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 990
Pages: 1147–1147

Head Matter:
William GILLARD, Respondent v. AIG INSURANCE COMPANY and AIG and the Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania and Key Auto Insurance Plan and AIG Claims Services, Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
March 16, 2010.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 16th day of March, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, paraphrased for clarity, are:
a. Whether the attorney-client privilege applies to communications from the attorney to the client.
b. Whether the Superior Court erred in holding the attorney-client privilege applies only to confidential communications from the client to the attorney, pursuant to Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. Fleming, 924 A.2d 1259 (Pa.Super.2007).