Case Name: Annie Kisterboch Pabst, administratrix, &c., respondent, v. Helen K. Haman et al., appellants
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1937-01-22
Citations: 121 N.J. Eq. 263
Docket Number: 
Parties: Annie Kisterboch Pabst, administratrix, &c., respondent, v. Helen K. Haman et al., appellants.
Judges: For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells. WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Cole, JJ. 13.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 121
Pages: 263–263

Head Matter:
Annie Kisterboch Pabst, administratrix, &c., respondent, v. Helen K. Haman et al., appellants.
[Decided January 22d, 1937.]
Hr. Joseph Beck Tyler, for the respondent.
Messrs. Oassman •& Gottlieb, for the appellants.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Davis, and reported in 120 N. J Eq. 451.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells. WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Cole, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.