Case Name: Ernesto PACHECO-PACHECO, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-05-06
Citations: 277 F. App'x 700
Docket Number: No. 04-72850
Parties: Ernesto PACHECO-PACHECO, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 277
Pages: 700–700

Head Matter:
Ernesto PACHECO-PACHECO, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 04-72850.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 22, 2008.
Filed May 6, 2008.
Ernesto Pacheco-Pacheco, pro se.
Cindy S. Fender, Michelle E. Gorden Latour, Michele Y.F. Sarko, U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
Before: GRABER, FISHER, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Ernesto Pacheco-Pacheco, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge's decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Petitioner has waived any challenge to the BIA's order because he failed to raise any claims in his opening brief. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.