Case Name: Hazlett v. Whalen
Court: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1900-11-19
Citations: 15 Pa. Super. 338
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 69
Parties: Hazlett v. Whalen.
Judges: Before Rice, P. J., Beaver, Oready, W. W. Porter and W. D. Porter, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania Superior Court Reports
Volume: 15
Pages: 338–338

Head Matter:
Hazlett v. Whalen.
November 19, 1900:
Argued Oct. 8, 1900.
Appeal, No. 69, Oct. T., 1900, by defendant, in suit of A. Hazlett to use of the Industrial Trust, Title & Savings Company against Ellen M. Whalen, owner, etc., appellant, who was sued with Archibald Neill, contractor, from judgment of C. P. No. 3, Phila. Co., Dec. T., 1893, No. 49, M. L. D., on verdict for plaintiff.
Before Rice, P. J., Beaver, Oready, W. W. Porter and W. D. Porter, JJ.
Affirmed.
Opinion by Beaver, J.
Sci. fa. sur judgment. Before McMicha.ee, J.
By agreement of counsel made at the trial, the testimony and verdict in Peters to use v. Whalen controlled this case.
• Verdict and judgment for plaintiff for $104.76. Defendant appealed.
I). J. Callaghan, with him William A. Rever, for appellant.
E. Runn Ranson, with him P. F. Rothermel,- Jr., for appellee.

Opinion:
Opinion by
Beaver, J.,
This case was tried in the court below under an agreement of counsel that the verdict should follow the decision of Peters et al., use of, v. Whalen et al., the testimony taken in the latter case to apply to both. The case was presented to us in the same paper-book and upon the same argument as No. 68 of October term, 1900, in which an opinion has this day been filed. The conclusion which we have reached in that case, therefore, .applies to this and, for the reason's therein stated, the judgment is affirmed.