Case Name: Raul RAMIREZ, a/k/a Angel Tamez, a/k/a Juan Rodriguez, a/k/a Jose Ortiz, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1997-12-24
Citations: 704 So. 2d 693
Docket Number: No. 96-02544
Parties: Raul RAMIREZ, a/k/a Angel Tamez, a/k/a Juan Rodriguez, a/k/a Jose Ortiz, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: FRANK and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 704
Pages: 693–694

Head Matter:
Raul RAMIREZ, a/k/a Angel Tamez, a/k/a Juan Rodriguez, a/k/a Jose Ortiz, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 96-02544.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Dec. 24, 1997.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Robert D. Rosen, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Angela D. McCravy, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

Opinion:
DANAHY, Acting Chief Judge.
The appellant's claim that his probation was revoked for a violation of a condition of probation that was not imposed upon him is without merit as shown by the transcript of the revocation hearing. However, he is correct in that the written judgment contains an erroneous reference to the condition violated. We affirm the conviction and sentence but remand for correction of the written order to conform to the oral pronouncement by the trial court at the revocation hearing. See Pearce v. State, 677 So.2d 303 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). The appellant need not be present for this correction as it essentially deals with a scrivener's error.
Affirmed.
FRANK and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.