Case Name: REESE v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1928-10-10
Citations: 9 S.W.2d 1038
Docket Number: No. 12056
Parties: REESE v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 9
Pages: 1038–1038

Head Matter:
REESE v. STATE.
(No. 12056.)
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Oct. 10, 1928.
C. E. Florence, of Gilmer, for appellant.
A. A. Dawson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
CHRISTIAN, J.
The offense is manufacturing intoxicating liquor; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for one year.
The term of court at which appellant was tried terminated by adjournment on April 7, 1928. Appellant attempted to enter into an appeal bond on March 23, 1928, and appears to have been enlarged on such bond, although the record fails to disclose that he signed it as principal. The term of court not having adjourned, it was necessary, under article 816, C. C. P., for appellant to enter into a recognizance before he was entitled to be enlarged. In the absence of such recognizance, this court is without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Butler v. State, 108 Tex. Cr. R. 377, 300 S. W. 937.
The appeal is dismissed.
PER CURIAM. The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.