Case Name: ORANGE & N. W. RY. CO. et al. v. FAIRCHILDS
Court: Texas Courts of Civil Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1920-04-06
Citations: 220 S.W. 798
Docket Number: No. 886
Parties: ORANGE & N. W. RY. CO. et al. v. FAIRCHILDS.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 220
Pages: 798–798

Head Matter:
ORANGE & N. W. RY. CO. et al. v. FAIRCHILDS.
(No. 886.)
(Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Beaumont.
April 6, 1920.)
Error from District Court, Orange County; W. T. Davis, Judge.
Action by Ed Fairchilds against the Orange & Northwestern Railway Company and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error. On motion for. order directing clerk to file transcript and statement of facts.
Motion denied.
Andrews, Streetman, Logue & Mobley, of Houston, and Holland & Holland, of Orange, for plaintiffs in error.
Smith & Crawford, of Beaumont, and John1 Hancock, of Thurber, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
HIGHTOWER, C. J.
This is a motion filed in this court on February 25, 1920, praying for an order directing the clerk of this court to file a transcript and statement of facts. The motion is denied, and ordered dismissed for the reasons stated in disposing of motion No. 885, Orange & Northwestern Railway Co. et al. v. Leroy Pruter, 220 S. W. 797, this day disposed of.