Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Harold Lee SMITH, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-06-27
Citations: 38 F. App'x 945
Docket Number: No. 02-6605
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Harold Lee SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 38
Pages: 945–945

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Harold Lee SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-6605.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted June 20, 2002.
Decided June 27, 2002.
Harold Lee Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Whisler, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Harold Lee Smith appeals the district court's order denying his motion for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Smith, No. CR-92-21-V (W.D.N.C. Apr. 3, 2002). Smith's motion to dismiss the indictment is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.