Case Name: Gilbert G. Velilla v. United Technologies Corporation, Hamilton Standard Division, et al.
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1986-10-16
Citations: 9 Conn. App. 803
Docket Number: 4955
Parties: Gilbert G. Velilla v. United Technologies Corporation, Hamilton Standard Division, et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Appellate Reports
Volume: 9
Pages: 803–803

Head Matter:
Gilbert G. Velilla v. United Technologies Corporation, Hamilton Standard Division, et al.
(4955)
Dupont, C. J., Borden and Spallone, Js.
Submitted on briefs October 10
released October 16, 1986
Gilbert G. Velilla, pro se, the appellant (plaintiff) filed a brief.
Brian E. Prindle filed a brief for the appellees (defendants).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We have fully reviewed the record and briefs, including appendices, submitted in this matter and, after subjecting the plaintiffs claims to the appropriate standard of review, we conclude that they are lacking in merit.
There is no error.