Case Name: Eugene Tutora, Appellant, v. Irwin Siegel, Respondent, et al., Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2007-05-01
Citations: 40 A.D.3d 227
Docket Number: 
Parties: Eugene Tutora, Appellant, v Irwin Siegel, Respondent, et al., Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 40
Pages: 227–228

Head Matter:
Eugene Tutora, Appellant, v Irwin Siegel, Respondent, et al., Defendant.
[833 NYS2d 385]

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Sallie Manzanet, J.), entered June 28, 2006, which granted defendant Irwin Siegel's motion to dismiss the complaint as against him pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Accepting the factual allegations raised in the complaint and in plaintiffs affidavit in opposition to the motion as true (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]), the court properly determined that no breach of contract claim was stated against Siegel. The pleadings failed to allege the existence of a contract between plaintiff and Siegel, who was acting on behalf of the fully disclosed corporate defendant. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Nardelli, Williams and Catterson, JJ.