Case Name: Sherman GRIFFIN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-03-25
Citations: 108 S.W.3d 46
Docket Number: No. ED 80799
Parties: Sherman GRIFFIN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J. and GLENN A. NORTON, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 108
Pages: 46–46

Head Matter:
Sherman GRIFFIN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 80799.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
March 25, 2003.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 27, 2003.
Jennifer Walsh, St. Louis, MO 63103, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Joel A. Block, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J. and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Sherman Griffin, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We previously affirmed Movant's convictions for second-degree robbery in violation of section 569.030, RSMo 2000. State v. Griffin, 28 S.W.3d 480 (Mo.App. E.D.2000). He now contends the motion court clearly erred in denying his claim that his trial attorney provided ineffective assistance by failing to file a motion for rehearing or an application for transfer.
Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).