Case Name: The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Robert H. WELLS, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1998-02-25
Citations: 706 So. 2d 934
Docket Number: No. 97-2012
Parties: The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Robert H. WELLS, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C. J., and GREEN and SHEVIN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 706
Pages: 934–935

Head Matter:
The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Robert H. WELLS, Appellee.
No. 97-2012.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 25, 1998.
Rehearing Denied April 1, 1998.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Paulette R. Taylor, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.
Zuckerman, Spaeder, Taylor & Evans and Beatrice Zuckerman and Stephen J. Bronis, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C. J., and GREEN and SHEVIN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The state appeals from an order which granted a writ of coram nobis setting aside a conviction entered on a guilty plea because of alleged ineffective assistance of counsel. Because, as we have recently and definitively held in Peart v. State, 705 So.2d 1059 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (en banc), coram nobis does not lie on such a ground, the judgment under review is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to dismiss the petition.
. The appellee was not in custody and thus not entitled to Rule 3.850 relief.
. We do not pass upon the substantivé correctness, or lack of it, of the order'below.