Case Name: Charlene EMANUEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BASTROP INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-02-04
Citations: 591 F. App'x 302
Docket Number: No. 14-50817; No. 14-50817
Parties: Charlene EMANUEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BASTROP INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before SMITH, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 591
Pages: 302–302

Head Matter:
Charlene EMANUEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BASTROP INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 14-50817
No. 14-50817.
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Feb. 4, 2015.
Charlene Emanuel, Austin, TX, pro se.
Thomas Phillip Brandt, John David Husted, Fanning Harper Martinson Brandt & Kutchin, P.C., Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before SMITH, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Charlene Emanuel appeals, pro se, a judgment of dismissal of her various claims of discrimination. She fails, however, to present legal arguments in her opening brief. Even pro se litigants must brief arguments to preserve them for challenge on appeal. Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir.1993).
The appeal is DISMISSED for failure to make any cognizable argument.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.