Case Name: Jerome BROWNRIDGE, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-12-08
Citations: 985 S.W.2d 355
Docket Number: No. 72930
Parties: Jerome BROWNRIDGE, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before HOFF, P. J. and GARY M. GAERTNER and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 985
Pages: 355–355

Head Matter:
Jerome BROWNRIDGE, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 72930.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Dec. 8, 1998.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Feb. 18, 1999.
David C. Hemingway, Asst. Sp. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Shaun J. Mackelprang, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before HOFF, P. J. and GARY M. GAERTNER and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Jerome Brownridge (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an eviden-tiary hearing.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. The motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. Judgment affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).