Case Name: Sheri Imogene COSBY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doctor CLARKE; Ms. Thornton; Mr. Chaimbers; Ms. Miller; Officer Smith, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-05-08
Citations: 34 F. App'x 111
Docket Number: No. 02-6369
Parties: Sheri Imogene COSBY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doctor CLARKE; Ms. Thornton; Mr. Chaimbers; Ms. Miller; Officer Smith, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 34
Pages: 111–111

Head Matter:
Sheri Imogene COSBY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doctor CLARKE; Ms. Thornton; Mr. Chaimbers; Ms. Miller; Officer Smith, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 02-6369.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 25, 2002.
Decided May 8, 2002.
Sheri Imogene Cosby, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Sheri Imogene Cosby appeals the district court's order dismissing without prejudice her 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Cosby v. Clarke, No. CA-02-5-2 (E.D.Va. Jan. 30, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.