Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DOUGLAS EUGENE ALDRICH, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2001-08-08
Citations: 175 Or. App. 643
Docket Number: 94CR0191TM; A85846
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DOUGLAS EUGENE ALDRICH, Appellant.
Judges: Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Deits, Chief Judge, and Wollheim, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 175
Pages: 643–644

Head Matter:
Submitted on remand from the Oregon Supreme Court May 11,
reversed and remanded August 8, 2001
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DOUGLAS EUGENE ALDRICH, Appellant.
94CR0191TM; A85846
29 P3d 1170
David E. Groom, Public Defender, and Eric R. Johansen, Deputy Public Defender, for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General, and Janet A. Klapstein-, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Deits, Chief Judge, and Wollheim, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
This case is before us on remand from the Supreme Court for reconsideration in light of its decision in State v. Fleetwood, 331 Or 511, 16 P3d 503 (2000). We have concluded in the case of a codefendant of this defendant that the error in erroneously admitting audio recordings was not harmless. State v. McCain, 175 Or App 274, 28 P3d 641 (2001). For the same reasons that we concluded that the error was not harmless as to the codefendant, we conclude that the error was not harmless as to defendant.
Reversed and remanded.