Case Name: Lori LEMMER, On Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NU-KOTE HOLDING, INC; et al, Defendants, David F. Brigante; Daniel M Kerrane; Anthony G Schmeck, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-08-12
Citations: 71 F. App'x 356
Docket Number: No. 02-11080
Parties: Lori LEMMER, On Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. NU-KOTE HOLDING, INC; et al, Defendants, David F. Brigante; Daniel M Kerrane; Anthony G Schmeck, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before EMILIO M. GARZA and DENNIS, Circuit Judges, and VANCE, District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 71
Pages: 356–356

Head Matter:
Lori LEMMER, On Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. NU-KOTE HOLDING, INC; et al, Defendants, David F. Brigante; Daniel M Kerrane; Anthony G Schmeck, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 02-11080.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 12, 2003.
Before EMILIO M. GARZA and DENNIS, Circuit Judges, and VANCE, District Judge.
District Judge of the Eastern District of Louisiana, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We hold the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the underlying case with prejudice. See Goldstein v. MCI Worldcom, 340 F.3d 238 (5th Cir.2003); Rosenzweig v. Azurix Corp., 332 F.3d 854 (5th Cir.2003).
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.