Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward Miller BRANTLEY, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-10-22
Citations: 334 F. App'x 544
Docket Number: No. 09-7514
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Edward Miller BRANTLEY, Jr., Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 334
Pages: 544–544

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Edward Miller BRANTLEY, Jr., Defendant—Appellant.
No. 09-7514.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 15, 2009.
Decided: Oct. 22, 2009.
Edward Miller Brantley, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appel-lee.
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Edward Miller Brantley, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Brantley, No. 5:07-cr-00020-BO-1 (E.D.N.C. July 29, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.