Case Name: Maurice JUGGINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Janet WURIE, Nurse Practitioner; Stan Berry, Sheriff; Hardy, Nurse; Malik, Dr.; Quintana, Lt., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-05-01
Citations: 276 F. App'x 348
Docket Number: No. 08-6004
Parties: Maurice JUGGINS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Janet WURIE, Nurse Practitioner; Stan Berry, Sheriff; Hardy, Nurse; Malik, Dr.; Quintana, Lt., Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 276
Pages: 348–349

Head Matter:
Maurice JUGGINS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Janet WURIE, Nurse Practitioner; Stan Berry, Sheriff; Hardy, Nurse; Malik, Dr.; Quintana, Lt., Defendants—Appellees.
No. 08-6004.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 14, 2008.
Decided: May 1, 2008.
Maurice Juggins, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Maurice Juggins, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). In his informal appellate brief, Juggins failed to address the district court's basis for dismissing his claims against Janet Wurie, Dr. Malik, and Nurse Hardy. Therefore, Juggins has waived appellate review of those claims. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b) ("The Court will limit its review to the issues raised in the informal brief."). We have reviewed the record as to Juggins' claims against the remaining Defendants and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Juggins v. Wurie, No. 1:07-cv01126-TSE-TCB (E.D.Va. Nov. 23, 2007). We also deny Juggins' motions for appointment of counsel and dismissal of payments for filing fees. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.