Case Name: THE SEABOARD SURETY CORPORATION OF AMERICA (a Corporation), Appellant, v. HOLLYWOOD STATE BANK (a Corporation), Respondent
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1936-09-11
Citations: 16 Cal. App. 2d 757
Docket Number: Civ. No. 11149
Parties: THE SEABOARD SURETY CORPORATION OF AMERICA (a Corporation), Appellant, v. HOLLYWOOD STATE BANK (a Corporation), Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports, Second Series
Volume: 16
Pages: 757–758

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 11149.
Second Appellate District, Division Two.
September 11, 1936.]
THE SEABOARD SURETY CORPORATION OF AMERICA (a Corporation), Appellant, v. HOLLYWOOD STATE BANK (a Corporation), Respondent.
Woodruff, Burr & Smith, Philip S. Ehrlich, Philip Grey Smith and L. 0. Hatch for Appellant.
Leonard Wilson and Joseph M. Argabrite for Respondent.

Opinion:
CRAIL, P. J.
This case comes before us upon the respondent's motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the notice of appeal was not filed within the time required by law, the contention being that appellant was a day late, and that contention depending in turn on when the order of the trial court was entered in the minutes. The case is very similar to the case of Berman v. Blankenship Motors, 140 Cal. App. 134 [34 Pac. (2d) 1035], and on the authority of that case the motion is denied.
Wood, J., and Gould, J., pro tem,, concurred.