Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nathaniel BURRESS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-07-15
Citations: 388 F. App'x 258
Docket Number: No. 09-7461
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nathaniel BURRESS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 388
Pages: 258–258

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nathaniel BURRESS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-7461.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 24, 2010.
Decided: July 15, 2010.
Brendan S. Leary, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellant. Randolph John Bernard, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Nathaniel Burress appeals the district court's orders granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence reduction, and denying his amended § 3582(c)(2) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Burress's motions for appointment of counsel and affirm the district court's orders. United States v. Burress, No. 5:04-cr-00031-FPS-JES-1 (N.D. W. Va. July 17, 2009); 2009 WL 5198296 (Dec. 22, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.