Case Name: Mark FAREWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James HINGELEY, public defender; Elizabeth Murtagh, deputy public defender, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-11-24
Citations: 585 F. App'x 851
Docket Number: No. 14-6781
Parties: Mark FAREWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James HINGELEY, public defender; Elizabeth Murtagh, deputy public defender, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before KING and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 585
Pages: 851–852

Head Matter:
Mark FAREWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James HINGELEY, public defender; Elizabeth Murtagh, deputy public defender, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 14-6781.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 20, 2014.
Decided: Nov. 24, 2014.
Mark Farewell, Appellant Pro Se.
Before KING and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Mark Farewell appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Farewell v. Hingeley, No. 1:14-cv-00391-JCC-TCB (E.D.Va. May 1, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.