Case Name: MURRAY v. DOWLING
Court: United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1803-12
Citations: 17 F. Cas. 1047
Docket Number: 
Parties: MURRAY v. DOWLING.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Cases
Volume: 17
Pages: 1047–1047

Head Matter:
Case No. 9,959.
MURRAY v. DOWLING.
[1 Cranch, C. C. 151.] 1
Circuit Court, District of Columbia.
Dec. Term, 1803.
Witness — Privileged Communications — Attorney.
An attorney at law cannot be compelled to disclose any fact the knowledge of which has been communicated to him by his client.
Replevin. Avowry for rent-arrear — plea in bar, no rent-arrear — general replication and issue. .
Mr. Peacock requested a postponement of the tidal on account of. the absence of the person who had possession of the original lease.
Mr. Hewitt, for the plaintiff, pressed the trial.
Mr. Peacock waived his application for a postponement, and offered ready.
On the trial Mr. Peacock being sworn as a witness, Mr. Hewitt asked.him whether there was a lease in writing. .• Mr; Peacock stated that his knowledge upon, that subject was derived from his client, in his capacity as counsel, and prayed the opinion of the court whether he was bound to answer.

Opinion:
TBÜED COURT
was of opinion he ought not to be compelled to answer, and sustained the objection.