Case Name: Ost v. Merchants & Farmers Bank et al.
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1924-11-13
Citations: 33 Ga. App. 80
Docket Number: 15086
Parties: Ost v. Merchants & Farmers Bank et al.
Judges: Jenldns, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 33
Pages: 80–80

Head Matter:
15086.
Ost v. Merchants & Farmers Bank et al.
Decided November 13, 1924.
Complaint; from city court of Jesup—Judge M. Price presiding. September 8, 1923.
Gibbs & Turner, J. H. Quarterman, Parker & Parker, for plaintiff.
Thomas & Walker, for defendants.

Opinion:
Bell, J.
In this action upon a promissory note a verdict was found for the plaintiff, the defendant filed a motion for a new tidal, which the court granted, and the plaintiff excepted. Held: 'Under the ruling of the Supremo Court in answer to a question certified, the evidence demanded a finding in favor of the plaintiff, and the trial court erred in granting a new trial. The material facts as disclosed by the evidence are embraced in the certified question. See Ost v. Merchants & Farmers Bank, 159 Ga. 200 (124 S. E. 883).
Judgment reversed.
Jenldns, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.