Case Name: CHESTER v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1912-12-11
Citations: 151 S.W. 1051
Docket Number: 
Parties: CHESTER v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 151
Pages: 1051–1052

Head Matter:
CHESTER v. STATE.
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Dec. 11, 1912.)
Criminal Law (§ 1097*) — Afpeal—Necessity of Statement of Facts.
Questions attempted to be raised by motion for new trial cannot be considered without a statement of facts.
[Ed. Note. — For other eases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2862, 2864, 2926, 2934, 2938, 2939, 2941, 2942, 2947;. Dee. Dig. § 1097.*]
Appeal from Criminal District Court, Dallas County; Robt. B. Seay, Judge.
Roy Chester was convicted of burglary, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
O. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Opinion:
PRENDERGAST, J.
The appellant was indicted by proper indictment for burglary, and under a correct charge was convicted.
There is neither bills of exceptions nor statement of facts. The questions attempted to be raised by the motion for new trial cannot be considered without a statement of facts.
The judgment is therefore affirmed.