Case Name: Andres Millan DIAZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., U.S. Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-08-10
Citations: 436 F. App'x 372
Docket Number: No. 10-60796
Parties: Andres Millan DIAZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 436
Pages: 372–372

Head Matter:
Andres Millan DIAZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 10-60796
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 10, 2011.
Olusegun Asekun, Arlington, TX, for Petitioner.
Elizabeth Young, Tangerlia Cox, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Andres Diaz petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") denying a motion to reopen his removal proceedings. To the extent that Millan raises arguments concerning the merits of his appeal to the BIA, we lack jurisdiction, because the petition for review is timely only as to the denial of the motion to reopen. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1); Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386, 395, 115 S.Ct. 1537, 131 L.Ed.2d 465 (1995). Because Millan does not contest the denial of the motion on the ground that it failed to identify previously unavailable material evidence, he has abandoned any such claim before this court. See INS v. Abudu, 485 U.S. 94, 104-05, 108 S.Ct. 904, 99 L.Ed.2d 90 (1988); see also Calderon-Ontiveros v. INS, 809 F.2d 1050, 1052 (5th Cir.1986).
Accordingly, the petition for review is DENIED in part and DISMISSED in part.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.