Case Name: Tony PENN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DAVID, C.O.; et al., Defendant- Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-04-23
Citations: 323 F. App'x 575
Docket Number: No. 07-15376
Parties: Tony PENN, Plaintiff — Appellant, v. DAVID, C.O.; et al., Defendant— Appellee.
Judges: Before: GRABER, GOULD, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 323
Pages: 575–575

Head Matter:
Tony PENN, Plaintiff — Appellant, v. DAVID, C.O.; et al., Defendant— Appellee.
No. 07-15376.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 13, 2009.
Filed April 23, 2009.
Tony Penn, Corcoran, CA, pro se.
Before: GRABER, GOULD, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Tony Penn, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1117 (9th Cir.2003), and we affirm.
The district court properly dismissed the action because Penn did not properly exhaust prison grievance procedures prior to filing suit in federal court. See McKinney v. Carey, 311 F.3d 1198, 1199 (9th Cir.2002) (per curiam) (holding that exhaustion under § 1997e(a) must occur pri- or to commencement of the action); see also Wyatt, 315 F.3d at 1120 ("A prisoner's concession to nonexhaustion is a valid grounds for dismissal.").
We do not consider Penn's remaining contentions because they do not address the basis of the district court's ruling.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.