Case Name: MAY et al. v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1943-01-20
Citations: 167 S.W.2d 769
Docket Number: No. 22373
Parties: MAY et al. v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 167
Pages: 769–769

Head Matter:
MAY et al. v. STATE.
No. 22373.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Jan. 20, 1943.
A. M. Mood, of Fort Worth, for appellant.
Spurgeon E. Bell, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.
Appellants were jointly indicted and jointly tried upon a .charge of robbery. Each was convicted and punishment assessed against each of seven years in the penitentiary. All gave notice of appeal.
Marlin Holton filed his personal affidavit advising that he did not desire to further prosecute 'his appeal and the appeal was dismissed as to him on November 4, 1942.
John Benard on the 13th day of January, 1943, filed his personal affidavit advising that he did not desire to further prosecute his appeal, and same as to him is dismissed.
No bills of exception or statement of faots has been brought forward. A number of special charges were requested, some of which were given and some refused. The refused instructions cannot be appraised in the absence of the facts. Likewise, objections to the court's instruc-tions to the jury must be presumed to have been applicable to the facts as developed, and there is nothing before us indicating the contrary.
The judgment as to Gilbert May and Irvin McCray is affirmed.