Case Name: Michael T. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TUPPERWARE, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-02-13
Citations: 4 F. App'x 157
Docket Number: No. 00-2316
Parties: Michael T. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TUPPERWARE, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINS, DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 4
Pages: 157–158

Head Matter:
Michael T. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TUPPERWARE, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 00-2316.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 8, 2001.
Decided Feb. 13, 2001.
Michael T. Johnson, pro se,
Before WILKINS, DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Michael T. Johnson appeals from the district court's order dismissing his complaint in which he alleged that he was discriminated against on the basis of race and age and that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel during his Workers' Compensation proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. Tupperware, Inc., No. CA-98-3282-4-17AK (D.S.C. filed Sept. 19, 2000; entered Sept. 20, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.