Case Name: Ulysses CRENSHAW, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-10-16
Citations: 570 So. 2d 349
Docket Number: No. 88-1497
Parties: Ulysses CRENSHAW, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before HUBBART, FERGUSON and LEVY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 570
Pages: 349–350

Head Matter:
Ulysses CRENSHAW, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 88-1497.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 16, 1990.
On Motion for Rehearing and Certification Dec. 4, 1990.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Dean A. Mitchell, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Jorge Espinosa, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before HUBBART, FERGUSON and LEVY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We need not address the question whether admitting a 911 tape into evidence, where the victim identified the defendant as her assailant, was erroneous. The issue was not preserved for review by a specific contemporaneous objection. Castor v. State, 365 So.2d 701 (Fla.1978).
Because the trial court failed to enter written reasons in support of its departure sentence, the matter must be remanded for resentencing within the guidelines. Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla.1990).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for resentencing.