Case Name: Warren E. BURNHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-12-19
Citations: 213 F. App'x 562
Docket Number: No. 04-56834
Parties: Warren E. BURNHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before: PREGERSON, THOMPSON, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 213
Pages: 562–563

Head Matter:
Warren E. BURNHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 04-56834.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Dec. 6, 2006.
Filed Dec. 19, 2006.
Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, Santa Fe Springs, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Joanne S. Osinoff, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney Civil & Tax Divisions, Los Angeles, CA, Jaime Preciado, Special Asst. U.S. Atty., Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before: PREGERSON, THOMPSON, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Warren Burnham appeals the denial of his application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income disability benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 423, 1381a. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
Dr. Choo's treating physician reports and the supplemental report requested by the Administrative Law Judge after remand from the Social Security Appeals Council, and Dr. Borden's testimony arguably would support Burnham's claim for benefits. However, we find the stale state of the record, absent further evidence, precludes us from making that determination or from making a contrary determination. Accordingly, this matter is remanded to the Social Security Administration Appeals Council for further development of the record.
REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.