Case Name: Jernard AKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Department of Justice; Federal Bureau of Prisons; Harry G. Lappin, Director; Associate Warden of Evans Correctional Institution; Tyrone Allen, Associate Warden; Robert McLafferty, Special Agent; Steven Price, Officer, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-10-02
Citations: 202 F. App'x 592
Docket Number: No. 06-6979
Parties: Jernard AKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Department of Justice; Federal Bureau of Prisons; Harry G. Lappin, Director; Associate Warden of Evans Correctional Institution; Tyrone Allen, Associate Warden; Robert McLafferty, Special Agent; Steven Price, Officer, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 202
Pages: 592–593

Head Matter:
Jernard AKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Department of Justice; Federal Bureau of Prisons; Harry G. Lappin, Director; Associate Warden of Evans Correctional Institution; Tyrone Allen, Associate Warden; Robert McLafferty, Special Agent; Steven Price, Officer, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 06-6979.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 26, 2006.
Decided: Oct. 2, 2006.
Jernard Akins, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Office of the United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Jernard Akins appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Akins also appeals the district court's order denying his subsequent Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's orders. See Akins v. United States, 3:04-cv-23200-MBS (D.S.C. filed Mar. 22, 2006 & entered Mar. 23, 2006; filed May 1, 2006 & entered May 2, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.