Case Name: James BOERSIG, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1997-11-18
Citations: 959 S.W.2d 862
Docket Number: No. 71742
Parties: James BOERSIG, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before AHRENS, P.J., and CRANDALL and KAROHL, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 959
Pages: 862–862

Head Matter:
James BOERSIG, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 71742.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Nov. 18, 1997.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 8, 1998.
Application for Transfer Denied Feb. 24, 1998.
Dave Hemingway, Asst. Sp. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., David R. Truman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before AHRENS, P.J., and CRANDALL and KAROHL, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
James Boersig, Movant, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties and find the motion court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).