Case Name: Transit-Mix Concrete, Inc., a Florida Corporation, v. Joseph B. Hill; Transit-Mix Concrete, Inc., a Florida Corporation, v. C. M. Dunham (Two Cases)
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1941-11-07
Citations: 148 Fla. 425
Docket Number: 
Parties: Transit-Mix Concrete, Inc., a Florida Corporation, v. Joseph B. Hill Transit-Mix Concrete, Inc., a Florida Corporation, v. C. M. Dunham (Two Cases)
Judges: Brown, C. J., Whitfield, Buford and Adams, J. J., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 148
Pages: 425–426

Head Matter:
Transit-Mix Concrete, Inc., a Florida Corporation, v. Joseph B. Hill Transit-Mix Concrete, Inc., a Florida Corporation, v. C. M. Dunham (Two Cases)
4 So. (2nd) 365
Division A
Opinion Filed November 7, 1941
George P. Garrett and Edward K. Goethe, for Plaintiff in Error;
E. W., & R. C. Davis, for Defendants in Error.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The above styled causes resulting in judgments in favor of defendants in the court below have been consolidated in one transcript and presented together for consideration here.
We have carefully examined the record and find no reversible error made to appear.
No questions involved here appear to warrant the promulgation of an opinion discussing the contentions of the parties and the reasons for upholding the judgments.
It is sufficient to say that on issues clearly presented by the pleadings (the declaration and the third plea of each of the defendants), the preponderance of the evidence supports the defendants' pleas.
The pleas were sufficient to show a valid agreement for withdrawals of funds (for which defendants were sued) by each of the corporate stockholders, in compensation for services to the corporation, from profits earned; and to show a final settlement based on such agreement whereby the agreement was ratified and executed.
The judgments should be affirmed.
So ordered.
Affirmed.
Brown, C. J., Whitfield, Buford and Adams, J. J., concur.