Case Name: ELMER FAIRCLOUGH AND MARTHA FAIRCLOUGH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. HERMAN BAUMGARTNER AND THERESA BAUMGARTNER, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1951-11-19
Citations: 8 N.J. 187
Docket Number: 
Parties: ELMER FAIRCLOUGH AND MARTHA FAIRCLOUGH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. HERMAN BAUMGARTNER AND THERESA BAUMGARTNER, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 8
Pages: 187–190

Head Matter:
ELMER FAIRCLOUGH AND MARTHA FAIRCLOUGH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. HERMAN BAUMGARTNER AND THERESA BAUMGARTNER, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Argued November 12, 1951
Decided November 19, 1951.
Mr. J. Mortimer Rubensiein argued the cause for the appellants (Mr. Milton Schamach, attorney).
Mr. I. Arthur Weiss argued the cause for the respondents (Messrs. Weiss & Weiss, attorneys).

Opinion:
Per Citrtam.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Grimshaw.
For affirmance—Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Case, Olipiiant, Waohbnbeld, Burling and Acicerson—6.
For reversal—None.