Case Name: CLARENCE ANTOINE v. INTERURBAN TRANSPORTATION CO., INC.
Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1932-03-16
Citations: 19 La. App. 216
Docket Number: No. 4125
Parties: CLARENCE ANTOINE v. INTERURBAN TRANSPORTATION CO., INC.
Judges: 
Reporter: Louisiana Court of Appeals Reports
Volume: 19
Pages: 216–216

Head Matter:
No. 4125
Second Circuit
CLARENCE ANTOINE v. INTERURBAN TRANSPORTATION CO., INC.
(March 16, 1932. Opinion and Decree.)
Guión & Upton, of New Orleans, and Peterman, Dear & Peterman, of Alexandria, attorneys for plaintiff, appellant.
Hawthorn, Stafford & Pitts, of Alexandria, attorneys for defendant, appellee.

Opinion:
McGREGOR, J.
This case grows out of the same state of facts as those of Peter and Adeline Antoine against this same defendant. The three cases were consolidated for trial and were all' submitted on the same evidence. The lower court rejected the plaintiff's demand and rendered judgment for the defendant, and the plaintiff has appealed.
For the reasons assigned in the case of Peter Antoine v. Interurban Transportation Company, Incorporated, 19 La. App. 203, 140 So. 151, the judgment appealed from is affirmed, with all the costs to be paid by the plaintiff, appellant.