Case Name: Albert Weber, Appellant, v. Abraham Suderov, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1929-04-05
Citations: 133 Misc. 832
Docket Number: 
Parties: Albert Weber, Appellant, v. Abraham Suderov, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 133
Pages: 832–832

Head Matter:
Albert Weber, Appellant, v. Abraham Suderov, Respondent.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
April 5, 1929.
Louis F. Perl, for the appellant.
Sternberg & Rosen [Sidney Wedeen of counsel], for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
In the condition of the proofs when plaintiff rested, defendant also resting on the statement of the trial judge that he gave defendant's counsel the alternative, " You can go to the jury on the case, or I will dismiss it without prejudice to a new cause of action," it was error to dismiss the complaint without prejudice, plaintiff having made out a case as to most if not all of the items embraced in his claim.
Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.
All concur; present, Bijur, Lydon and Frankenthaler, JJ.