Case Name: FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Petitioner, v. Ruby ROUSE, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1966-06-29
Citations: 194 So. 2d 260
Docket Number: No. 34815
Parties: FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Petitioner, v. Ruby ROUSE, Respondent.
Judges: THOMAS, DREW, CALDWELL and ERVIN, j}., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 194
Pages: 260–264

Head Matter:
FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Petitioner, v. Ruby ROUSE, Respondent.
No. 34815.
Supreme Court of Florida.
June 29, 1966.
On Rehearing Jan. 9, 1967.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 14, 1967.
Bolles, Goodwin & Ryskamp, Miami, for petitioner.
Nichols, Gaither, Beckham, Colson & Spence, and Horton & Schwartz, Miami, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
After careful examination of the record and briefs in this case in the light of the argument of counsel, we conclude that no such conflict has been 'demonstrated as justifies the exercise of jurisdiction by this court.
The petition for certiorari is, therefore, denied.
THOMAS, DREW, CALDWELL and ERVIN, j}., concur.
THORNAL, C. J., and ROBERTS and . O'CONNELL, JJ., dissent.'