Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Calvin Seaya, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1996-06-03
Citations: 228 A.D.2d 455
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Calvin Seaya, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 228
Pages: 455–455

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Calvin Seaya, Appellant.
[643 NYS2d 410]

Opinion:
Under the totality of the circumstances, the defendant was not denied meaningful representation by counsel (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137; People v Castro, 211 AD2d 806; People v Hayes, 186 AD2d 268). The defendant's sentence was neither harsh nor excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
The defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Miller, J. P., Ritter, Krausman and McGinity, JJ., concur.