Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Timothy Fair, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1993-03-12
Citations: 191 A.D.2d 956
Docket Number: Appeal No. 2
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Timothy Fair, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 191
Pages: 956–956

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Timothy Fair, Appellant.
(Appeal No. 2.)
[595 NYS2d 700]

Opinion:
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant's challenge to his sentence is without merit. Defendant received "the sentence for which he freely bargained" (People v Kohler, 147 AD2d 937, lv denied 73 NY2d 1017). Further, defendant received an even more favorable sentence than he bargained for when the court agreed to allow the sentence to run concurrently with the sentence previously imposed (see, Penal Law § 70.25 [2-b]). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Wisner, J. — Burglary, 2nd Degree.) Present— Denman, P. J., Green, Balio, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.