Case Name: Kenneth H. NEWKIRK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ms. GREEN, Deputy/Transportation; Mr. Milton, Deputy/Law Library; Mr. Dickerson, Deputy/Classification; Ms. J.O. Perry, Deputy/Classification; Ms. Cheeseboro, Sergeant/Was in Records; Mr. Vogt, Deputy/Work in the Hole 1-4 Segregation; Ms. Williams, Sergeant/Segregation 1-4; Roy Cherry, Superintendent, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-01-22
Citations: 505 F. App'x 274
Docket Number: No. 12-7562
Parties: Kenneth H. NEWKIRK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ms. GREEN, Deputy/Transportation; Mr. Milton, Deputy/Law Library; Mr. Dickerson, Deputy/Classification; Ms. J.O. Perry, Deputy/Classification; Ms. Cheeseboro, Sergeant/Was in Records; Mr. Vogt, Deputy/Work in the Hole 1-4 Segregation; Ms. Williams, Sergeant/Segregation 1-4; Roy Cherry, Superintendent, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 505
Pages: 274–275

Head Matter:
Kenneth H. NEWKIRK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ms. GREEN, Deputy/Transportation; Mr. Milton, Deputy/Law Library; Mr. Dickerson, Deputy/Classification; Ms. J.O. Perry, Deputy/Classification; Ms. Cheeseboro, Sergeant/Was in Records; Mr. Vogt, Deputy/Work in the Hole 1-4 Segregation; Ms. Williams, Sergeant/Segregation 1-4; Roy Cherry, Superintendent, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 12-7562.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 17, 2013.
Decided: Jan. 22, 2013.
Kenneth H. Newkirk, Appellant Pro Se.
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kenneth H. Newkirk appeals the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint for failure to prosecute. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b). On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Newkirk's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, Newkirk has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment, deny Newkirk's motion to be transferred to another prison and three motions for appointment of counsel, and deny as moot Newkirk's motion to withdraw two of his motions for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
The order is final and appealable as something more than an amendment to the complaint is needed to cure the defects in Newkirk's case. See Domino Sugar v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993).