Case Name: SOUTHBRIDGE PARK, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOROUGH OF FORT LEE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1984-04-05
Citations: 6 N.J. Tax 351
Docket Number: 
Parties: SOUTHBRIDGE PARK, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOROUGH OF FORT LEE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Tax Court Reports
Volume: 6
Pages: 351–352

Head Matter:
SOUTHBRIDGE PARK, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOROUGH OF FORT LEE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey-Appellate Division
Argued February 28, 1984
Decided April 5, 1984.
Before Judges ANTELL, JOELSON and McELROY.
Saul A. Wolfe argued the cause for appellant (Skoloff & Wolfe, attorneys; Saul A. Wolfe of counsel and on the brief).
Steven Muhlstock argued the cause for respondent {Melvin Gittleman, attorney; Steven Muhlstock on the brief).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the judgment of the Tax court, substantially for the reasons given by John J. Hopkins, J.T.C. in his opinion in this matter published in 4 N.J.Tax 30 (1981). We add that by reason of the stipulation entered into by plaintiff at the pretrial conference we conceive no reason for a remand.
Affirmed.