Case Name: Clarence MACKEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1971-06-22
Citations: 249 So. 2d 775
Docket Number: No. 70-1176
Parties: Clarence MACKEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before PEARSON, C. J., and SWANN, J., and ADAMS, ALTO, Associate Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 249
Pages: 775–775

Head Matter:
Clarence MACKEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 70-1176.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
June 22, 1971.
Rehearing Denied July 30, 1971.
Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and Alan S. Becker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and J. Robert Olian, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.
Before PEARSON, C. J., and SWANN, J., and ADAMS, ALTO, Associate Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is the second appearance of this defendant upon conviction of this charge of robbery. See Mackey v. State, Fla.App. 1970, 234 So.2d 418.
Upon remand, appellant waived trial by jury and was tried before the court without jury. He was found guilty, adjudicated and sentenced to twenty-five years in the state prison. On this appeal he questions the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the finding of guilt. We hold that the evidence is sufficient, see Prather v. State, Fla.App. 1966, 182 So.2d 273; compare People v. Lincoln, 89 Cal.App.2d 795, 201 P.2d 846 (1949).
Appellant's second point urges error upon the ruling of the trial court which excluded testimony taken in another case. The ruling of the trial court is correct under the test set forth in Blackwell v. State, 79 Fla. 709, 86 So. 224 (1920).
Affirmed.