Case Name: Bowman and wife vs. Middleton
Court: Court of Chancery of South Carolina
Jurisdiction: South Carolina
Decision Date: 1789-10
Citations: 1 Des. Eq. 163
Docket Number: 
Parties: Bowman and wife vs. Middleton.
Judges: Present — Chancellors Ruteedge, Hctso2t, and Mathews.
Reporter: South Carolina Equity Reports
Volume: 1
Pages: 163–163

Head Matter:
Present — Chancellors Ruteedge, Hctso2t, and Mathews.
Bowman and wife vs. Middleton.
OCTOBER, 1789.
CASE LIV,
n. b. p. 215.
Court ordei,. ed new trial, a“s® dict was gi-Sue directed

Opinion:
On hearing Messrs. Moultrie and Pringle, solicitors for complainants, on a question for a new trial at common law, on an issue formerly directed and verdict found for defendant: And on hearing Mr. Parker, solicitor for defendant against the motion, ordered, that a trial at law be had de novo. The court also recommended that in consequence of a difference of opinion in the surveyors employed in surveying the lands in dispute, that other surveyors be called in»