Case Name: Erma J. MATTHEWS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M.C. DEAN, INCORPORATED; Michael Dean, Defendants-Appellees, and M.C. DEAN, a/k/a Michael Dean, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-06-23
Citations: 452 F. App'x 297
Docket Number: No. 10-1322
Parties: Erma J. MATTHEWS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M.C. DEAN, INCORPORATED; Michael Dean, Defendants-Appellees, and M.C. DEAN, a/k/a Michael Dean, Defendant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 452
Pages: 297–298

Head Matter:
Erma J. MATTHEWS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M.C. DEAN, INCORPORATED; Michael Dean, Defendants-Appellees, and M.C. DEAN, a/k/a Michael Dean, Defendant.
No. 10-1322.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 5, 2010.
Decided: June 23, 2011.
Erma J. Matthews, Appellant Pro Se. Manesh Kumar Rath, Robert Austin Sheffield, Keller & Heckman, Washington, D.C., for Appellee M.C. Dean, Incorporated.
Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Erma J. Matthews appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of her former employer. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court at the summary judgment hearing. MATTHEWS v. M.C. DEAN, INC., No. 1:09-cv-00622-LMB-TRJ, 2010 WL 2323674 (E.D.Va. Mar. 12, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.