Case Name: Charles R. OTEC, III, et ux., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD, et al., Defendants/Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-01-03
Citations: 890 S.W.2d 387
Docket Number: No. 64605
Parties: Charles R. OTEC, III, et ux., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD, et al., Defendants/Respondents.
Judges: Before GRIMM, C.J., and CARL R. GAERTNER and CRANE, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 890
Pages: 387–387

Head Matter:
Charles R. OTEC, III, et ux., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD, et al., Defendants/Respondents.
No. 64605.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Jan. 3, 1995.
J. Richard MeEaehern, St. Louis, for appellants.
William A. Brasher, Timothy D. Richardson, St. Louis, for respondents.
Before GRIMM, C.J., and CARL R. GAERTNER and CRANE, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff-driver and his wife sued railroad for personal injuries sustained in a collision with a train at a railroad crossing. A jury found driver 100% negligent. Plaintiffs appeal.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).