Case Name: Randy H. GRIFFIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2016-10-13
Citations: 202 So. 3d 109
Docket Number: No. 4D16-1802
Parties: Randy H. GRIFFIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: CIKLIN, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and CONNER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 202
Pages: 109–109

Head Matter:
Randy H. GRIFFIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D16-1802.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Oct. 13, 2016.
Randy H. Griffin, Florida City, pro se.
No brief filed for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the appealed order. In addition, because the arguments made by appellant are repetitive and successive of his prior appeals in case nos. 4D90-2319 and 4D99-1945, we order appellant to show cause within twenty days why this court should not impose the sanction of no longer accepting his pro se filings and why it should not refer appellant to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings. State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.199); section 944.279(1), Fla. State. (2012).
Affirmed.
CIKLIN, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and CONNER, JJ., concur.