Case Name: In the Interest of: M.M.M., a minor child
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-08-29
Citations: 34 S.W.3d 826
Docket Number: No. ED 76762
Parties: In the Interest of: M.M.M., a minor child.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J. and PAUL J. SIMON and JAMES R. DOWD, J.J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 34
Pages: 826–827

Head Matter:
In the Interest of: M.M.M., a minor child.
No. ED 76762.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Aug. 29, 2000.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 17, 2001.
Seth Shumaker, Kirksville, for appellant.
Roya R. Hough, Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J. and PAUL J. SIMON and JAMES R. DOWD, J.J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
J.M., Mother, appeals from the judgment of the trial court terminating her parental rights with respect to M.M.M., her minor child. On appeal, Mother contends that the trial court erred in its judgment because not all parties were issued a summons, or served or waived service of the petition and no hearing was held to determine whether all parties received a summons and a copy of the petition; because the Division of Family Services failed to prepare and file a proper social report because it did not contain informa tion pertaining to parental capabilities and fitness; because the Division of Family Services failed to disclose expert witnesses and unredacted reports the Division expected to introduce; and because the Division failed to prove by clear, convincing and cogent evidence that termination of the Mother's parental rights was in the best interest of the child.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion reciting detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).