Case Name: IN RE: Gloria TYNDLE, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-11-20
Citations: 702 F. App'x 178
Docket Number: No. 17-1983
Parties: IN RE: Gloria TYNDLE, Petitioner.
Judges: Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 702
Pages: 178–178

Head Matter:
IN RE: Gloria TYNDLE, Petitioner.
No. 17-1983
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: November 16, 2017
Decided: November 20, 2017
Gloria Tyndle, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Gloria Tyndle petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has' unduly delayed in ruling on her 28 U.S.C- § 2256 (2012) motion. She seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny the motion to expedite, and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED