Case Name: Lawrence FRIEDMAN, M.D., Petitioner, v. Barbara POPE, Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-12-27
Citations: 777 So. 2d 1018
Docket Number: No. 2D00-237
Parties: Lawrence FRIEDMAN, M.D., Petitioner, v. Barbara POPE, Respondent.
Judges: CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and BLUE and GREEN, JJ., Concur. '
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 777
Pages: 1018–1019

Head Matter:
Lawrence FRIEDMAN, M.D., Petitioner, v. Barbara POPE, Respondent.
No. 2D00-237.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Dec. 27, 2000.
Stephen H. Sears and Brendan M. Lee of MacFarlane, Ferguson and McMullen, Tampa, for Petitioner.
James B. Tilghman, Jr., and Gary D. Fox of Stewart, Tilghman, Fox and Bian-chi, P.A., Miami, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari is denied. This denial is without prejudice to petitioner objecting to follow-up deposition questions which seek information protected by the work product as defined in Southern Bell Telephone & Telgraph Co. v. Deason, 632 So.2d 1377 (Fla.1994), and section 766.106(5), Florida Statutes (1999). Follow-up deposition questions regarding matters that occurred after the notice of intent to initiate litigation was served do not, based on this fact alone, constitute work product.
Petition denied.
CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and BLUE and GREEN, JJ., Concur. '