Case Name: STATE v. NORRIS
Court: Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jurisdiction: Maryland
Decision Date: 1965-01-07
Citations: 237 Md. 282
Docket Number: No. 119
Parties: STATE v. NORRIS
Judges: 
Reporter: Maryland Reports
Volume: 237
Pages: 282–283

Head Matter:
STATE v. NORRIS
[No. 119,
September Term, 1964.]
Decided January 7, 1965.
The cause was argued before Prescott, C. J., and Horney, Marbury, Sybert and OppEnheimer, JJ.
Fred Oken, Assistant Attorney General, with whom were Thomas B. Finan, Attorney General, Prank H. Newell, III, State's Attorney, and Austin W. Brisendine, Assistant State’s Attorney, respectively, for Baltimore County, on the brief, for appellant.
W. Giles Parker, with whom was Alan H. Murrell on the brief, for appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This is a companion case to State v. Comes, 237 Md. 271. The cases were argued together; the facts being almost identical. The same principles of law involved there are involved here.
For the reasons stated in Comes, the order of the trial judge dismissing the indictments herein must be affirmed.
Order affirmed; costs to be paid by the County Council of Baltimore County.