Case Name: SHELL OIL COMPANY et al. v. Mabel HEBERT et al.; SHELL OIL COMPANY et al. v. Mae Malbrough THERIOT et al.; SHELL OIL COMPANY et al. v. Felix HEBERT et al.
Court: Louisiana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1979-10-19
Citations: 376 So. 2d 318
Docket Number: No. 65392
Parties: SHELL OIL COMPANY et al. v. Mabel HEBERT et al. SHELL OIL COMPANY et al. v. Mae Malbrough THERIOT et al. SHELL OIL COMPANY et al. v. Felix HEBERT et al.
Judges: TATE and DIXON, JJ., concur in the denial. The trial court correctly sustained the pleas of prescription; title cannot be acquired or lost by “estoppel.”
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 376
Pages: 318–318

Head Matter:
SHELL OIL COMPANY et al. v. Mabel HEBERT et al. SHELL OIL COMPANY et al. v. Mae Malbrough THERIOT et al. SHELL OIL COMPANY et al. v. Felix HEBERT et al.
No. 65392.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Oct. 19, 1979.

Opinion:
In Re: Elsie Mae Braud, et al, applying - for Certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Nos. 12,573; 12,574; and 12,575, Parish of Terrebonne, 373 So.2d 1339.
Writ denied. While the rationale of the Court of Appeal may be incorrect, the result herein is correct.
TATE and DIXON, JJ., concur in the denial. The trial court correctly sustained the pleas of prescription; title cannot be acquired or lost by "estoppel."