Case Name: The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Edel OJEDA, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1998-07-08
Citations: 712 So. 2d 480
Docket Number: No. 97-3052
Parties: The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Edel OJEDA, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., LEVY, J., and DAUKSCH, Associate Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 712
Pages: 480–480

Head Matter:
The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Edel OJEDA, Appellee.
No. 97-3052.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 8, 1998.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Sandra S. Jaggard, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.
Michael B. Holden, Ft.Lauderdale, for ap-pellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., LEVY, J., and DAUKSCH, Associate Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
At the time of the order granting Appel-lee's writ of error coram nobis, the trial judge did not have the benefit of Peart v. State, 705 So.2d 1059 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)(en banc). Under the authority of Peart, we reverse.
Reversed.