Case Name: OFFICE SPECIALTY MANUF'G CO. v. ELBERT COUNTY
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1896-05-05
Citations: 73 F. 1022
Docket Number: No. 455
Parties: OFFICE SPECIALTY MANUF’G CO. v. ELBERT COUNTY.
Judges: Before PARDEE and. McCORMICK, Circuit Judges, and SPEER, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter
Volume: 73
Pages: 1022–1022

Head Matter:
OFFICE SPECIALTY MANUF’G CO. v. ELBERT COUNTY.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
May 5, 1896.)
No. 455.
Error to the United States Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia.
For former report, see 73 Fed. 324.
Daniel W. Rountree and W. C. Glenn, for plaintiff in error.
Alex. C. King and Jack J. Spalding, for defendant in error.
Before PARDEE and. McCORMICK, Circuit Judges, and SPEER, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The demurrer to the plaintiff's declaration was properly sustained. The argument in this court suggests that the plaintiff in error may, notwithstanding, have a valid claim against the .county of Elbert, and that the judgment of the circuit court should be without prejudice' to the prosecution of such claim. The judgment is amended by adding the words "without prejudice," and, as so amended, is affirmed.