Case Name: Louise Carlson, Appellant, v. Maria L. Winterson, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Common Pleas
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1894-04
Citations: 7 Misc. 689
Docket Number: 
Parties: Louise Carlson, Appellant, v. Maria L. Winterson, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 7
Pages: 689–689

Head Matter:
Louise Carlson, Appellant, v. Maria L. Winterson, Respondent.
(New York Common Pleas—General Term,
April, 1894.)
The granting of an order of restitution after reversal of a judgment is discretionary, and a denial of a motion therefor is a proper exercise of such discretion where the action has been retried and the same result reached as on the first trial.
Motion for restitution upon reversal of a judgment for plaintiff. See 3 Mise. Rep. 63, 639.
H. M. Hitchings, for appellant.
F. F. Bullard, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The granting of this motion is discretionary, and the provisions of the Code of Oivil Procedure respecting restitution on the reversal or vacation of a judgment or order are not exclusive. The party has his remedy by action. Haebler v. Myers, 132 N. Y. 363; Baylies' New Trials & App. 191.
Since the submission of this motion it appears that the action has been retried in the court below, and that the trial has again resulted in a verdict and judgment for plaintiff.
We deem it, therefore, a proper exercise of our discretion to deny restitution upon summary application therefor. No costs of this motion.
Present: Daly, Ch. J., Bisohoff and Pryor, JL
Motion denied, without costs.