Case Name: In the Matter of the Claim of Fay Gettinger, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent. In the Matter of the Arbitration between Fownes Bros. & Co., Inc., Respondent, and Consolidated Glove Cutters and Shavers Union, Local 1714, Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, et al., Appellants. Edwin Carlson et al., Respondents, v. Rondout National Bank, Appellant; George J. Hornbeck, Respondent, v. H. Eugene Towner, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1961-11-16
Citations: 14 A.D.2d 969
Docket Number: 
Parties: (A) In the Matter of the Claim of Fay Gettinger, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent. (B) In the Matter of the Arbitration between Fownes Bros. & Co., Inc., Respondent, and Consolidated Glove Cutters and Shavers Union, Local 1714, Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, et al., Appellants. (C) Edwin Carlson et al., Respondents, v. Rondout National Bank, Appellant. (D) George J. Hornbeck, Respondent, v. H. Eugene Towner, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 14
Pages: 969–969

Head Matter:
(A) In the Matter of the Claim of Fay Gettinger, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent. (B) In the Matter of the Arbitration between Fownes Bros. & Co., Inc., Respondent, and Consolidated Glove Cutters and Shavers Union, Local 1714, Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, et al., Appellants. (C) Edwin Carlson et al., Respondents, v. Rondout National Bank, Appellant. (D) George J. Hornbeck, Respondent, v. H. Eugene Towner, Appellant.

Opinion:
[In each action] Motion for reargument denied, without costs.