Case Name: Michael S. ROSS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE for the CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA including Messrs. Robert C. Bonner and Michael Sulner, Assistant and Deputy Attorney, Criminal Complaints, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1975-02-20
Citations: 511 F.2d 524
Docket Number: No. 74-1919
Parties: Michael S. ROSS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE for the CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA including Messrs. Robert C. Bonner and Michael Sulner, Assistant and Deputy Attorney, Criminal Complaints, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before KOELSCH and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges, and RENFREW, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 511
Pages: 524–525

Head Matter:
Michael S. ROSS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE for the CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA including Messrs. Robert C. Bonner and Michael Sulner, Assistant and Deputy Attorney, Criminal Complaints, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 74-1919.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Feb. 20, 1975.
Michael S. Ross, in pro. per.
Clarke A. Knicely, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellee.
Before KOELSCH and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges, and RENFREW, District Judge.
The Honorable Charles B. Renfrew, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
The well-settled principle that mandamus does not lie to compel a United States District Attorney to perform a discretionary act (Inmates of Attica Correctional Facility v. Rockefeller, 477 F.2d 375 (2nd Cir. 1973)) is dispositive of this appeal.
Affirmed.