Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenyatta Hasani ADAMS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-09-02
Citations: 393 F. App'x 981
Docket Number: No. 10-6522
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenyatta Hasani ADAMS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 393
Pages: 981–981

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenyatta Hasani ADAMS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-6522.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 26, 2010.
Decided: Sept. 2, 2010.
Kenyatta Hasani Adams, Appellant Pro Se. Sherrie Scott Capotosto, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kenyatta Hasani Adams appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Adams, No. 2:07-cr-00113-RGD-JEB-1 (E.D.Va. filed Feb. 24, 2010 & entered Feb. 26, 2010); see also Dillon v. United States, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 2683, 2693-94, 177 L.Ed.2d 271 (2010) (holding that United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), does not apply to § 3582(c)(2) proceedings). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.