Case Name: Anthony D. DRISKELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2009-01-13
Citations: 276 S.W.3d 862
Docket Number: No. WD 69383
Parties: Anthony D. DRISKELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before THOMAS H. NEWTON, C.J., JAMES M. SMART, JR., and JAMES EDWARD WELSH, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 276
Pages: 862–862

Head Matter:
Anthony D. DRISKELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 69383.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jan. 13, 2009.
Mark A. Grothoff, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before THOMAS H. NEWTON, C.J., JAMES M. SMART, JR., and JAMES EDWARD WELSH, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Driskell appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief motion without an evidentiary hearing. He challenges the motion court's ruling that trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to file a motion to suppress incriminating evidence and failing to object to the admission of this evidence at trial.
For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).