Case Name: Humberto GOMEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-10-30
Citations: 681 So. 2d 933
Docket Number: No. 95-3144
Parties: Humberto GOMEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before GERSTEN, GODERICH and GREEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 681
Pages: 933–933

Head Matter:
Humberto GOMEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 95-3144.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 30, 1996.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Robert Kalter, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Sylvie Perez Posner, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before GERSTEN, GODERICH and GREEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing evidence of collateral sex crimes where both the charged offenses and the collateral crimes occurred in a familial setting and where the collateral crimes were sufficiently similar to the charged offenses. See Saffor v. State, 660 So.2d 668, 672 (Fla.1995); Shipman v. State, 668 So.2d 313 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
Affirmed.