Case Name: Alma SOLIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF CARSON CITY and Daniel Holub, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-01-05
Citations: 118 F. App'x 290
Docket Number: No. 02-17330
Parties: Alma SOLIS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. COUNTY OF CARSON CITY and Daniel Holub, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before: KOZINSKI, W. FLETCHER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 118
Pages: 290–290

Head Matter:
Alma SOLIS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. COUNTY OF CARSON CITY and Daniel Holub, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 02-17330.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 10, 2004.
Decided Jan. 5, 2005.
Jeffrey A. Dickerson, Esq., James Andre Boles, Esq., Law Offices of James Andre Boles, Reno, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Mark R. Forsberg, Esq., Carson City District Attorney’s Office, Carson City, NY, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before: KOZINSKI, W. FLETCHER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Plaintiff-Appellant Alma Solis sued the County of Carson City and several named officers under state and federal law for the use of excessive force. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendants. Solis' only point of appeal is that the magistrate judge erred in excluding evidence of an incident allegedly similar to the subject of this lawsuit. The magistrate judge did not abuse her discretion in ruling that the probative value of the prior act was substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.