Case Name: O. D. BRATTON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1956-03-02
Citations: 230 F.2d 952
Docket Number: No. 12548
Parties: O. D. BRATTON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 230
Pages: 952–952

Head Matter:
O. D. BRATTON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 12548.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
March 2, 1956.
Lowell W. Taylor, Memphis, Tenn., for appellant.
H. Brian Holland, Ellis N. Slack, Henry L. Spencer and Marvin W. Weinstein, Washington, D. C., Millsaps Fitzhugh, Memphis, Tenn., for appellee.
Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and ALLEN and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This case came on to be heard upon the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel;
On consideration whereof, it appearing that the findings of fact of the District Court are supported by the record and that the applicable statutes were correctly applied, Lazier v. United States, 8 Cir., 170 F.2d 521; Smith v. United States, D.C., 85 F.Supp. 838, affirmed 6 Cir., 180 F.2d 357. Cf. Stephenson v. Commissioner, 6 Cir., 101 F.2d 33, cer-tiorari denied 307 U.S. 647, 59 S.Ct. 1046, 83 L.Ed. 1527.
And no reversible error appearing in the record:
It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and it hereby is affirmed.