Case Name: Milan Powell, Appellant, v. Trans-Auto Systems, Inc., et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1969-05-12
Citations: 32 A.D.2d 650
Docket Number: 
Parties: Milan Powell, Appellant, v. Trans-Auto Systems, Inc., et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 32
Pages: 650–650

Head Matter:
Milan Powell, Appellant, v. Trans-Auto Systems, Inc., et al., Respondents.

Opinion:
Order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated June 12, 1968, affirmed, without costs. This third motion by plaintiff for summary judgment was properly denied. The practice of making successive motions for summary judgment, each based upon new factual assertions and proofs which were available to the movant from the outset, is to be discouraged (cf. Levitz v. Robbins Music Corp., 17 A D 2d 801). In any event, there are present issues of fact as to plaintiff's contributory negligence. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Benjamin and Martuseello, JJ., concur.