Case Name: Connie MELTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-08-07
Citations: 678 So. 2d 434
Docket Number: No. 95-3770
Parties: Connie MELTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: MINER, ALLEN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 678
Pages: 434–435

Head Matter:
Connie MELTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 95-3770.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Aug. 7, 1996.
Rehearing Denied Sept. 20, 1996.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Edward C. Hill, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellant did not move to withdraw her plea in the trial court, and the asserted issue regarding the voluntary and intelligent character of the plea is thus not now cognizable on direct appeal. Washington v. State, 582 So.2d 798 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Murray v. State, 566 So.2d 30 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). The remaining issue, regarding the trial court's decision to impose sentence within the applicable sentencing guidelines range, is likewise not a proper basis for appeal. See § 924.06, Fla. Stat. This appeal is therefore dismissed.
MINER, ALLEN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.