Case Name: ALBERT WALLIN v. GUST LAGERQUIST & SONS AND ANOTHER
Court: Minnesota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Minnesota
Decision Date: 1933-12-15
Citations: 190 Minn. 335
Docket Number: No. 29,698
Parties: ALBERT WALLIN v. GUST LAGERQUIST & SONS AND ANOTHER.
Judges: 
Reporter: Minnesota Reports
Volume: 190
Pages: 335–335

Head Matter:
ALBERT WALLIN v. GUST LAGERQUIST & SONS AND ANOTHER.
December 15, 1933.
No. 29,698.
R. D. Modeen, for relator.
J. Gt. Stirn, for Gust Lagerquist & Sons, employer, and Aetna Life Insurance Company, its insurer, respondents.
Reported in 251 N. W. 669.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Certiorari to the industrial commission to review an order denying compensation.
The industrial commission concluded that relator had long since completed recovery from whatever disability he suffered by reason of an industrial accident August 29, 1929. He Avas totally disabled until sometime in December, 1929. He then took up light work, which he continued until April 5, 1930. Then he resumed his former occupation and April lá, 1930, executed final receipt for his compensation. In March, 1932, he was "let out" by his employers, not because of disability or claim thereof, but because they did not have the work to permit them to continue his employment. There is credible medical testimony supporting the conclusion that relator is uoav suffering no disability attributable to his accident. Having such support in the evidence, nothing more need be said to show that the decision of the industrial commission should not be disturbed.
The Avrit is discharged and the order of the commission affirmed.