Case Name: Willie Reese WALKER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-10-23
Citations: 828 So. 2d 501
Docket Number: No. 3D02-2427
Parties: Willie Reese WALKER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before JORGENSON, COPE, and GODERICH, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 828
Pages: 501–501

Head Matter:
Willie Reese WALKER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D02-2427.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 23, 2002.
Willie Reese Walker, in proper person.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before JORGENSON, COPE, and GODERICH, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See, e.g., Weford v. State, 784 So.2d 1222, 1223-1224 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) (holding that prior sentencing as a youthful offender does not preclude consideration in habitual offender proceeding of such crimes as predicate offenses); Gadsen v. State, 805 So.2d 910 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Whitfield v. Singletary, 730 So.2d 314 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); see also Arce v. State, 762 So.2d 1003 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (affirming the denial of motion to correct sentence under Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000) where defendant was sentenced as a habitual offender).
Affirmed.