Case Name: In re: Andre Lamar WOODY, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-06-01
Citations: 228 F. App'x 368
Docket Number: No. 07-6416
Parties: In re: Andre Lamar WOODY, Petitioner.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 228
Pages: 368–369

Head Matter:
In re: Andre Lamar WOODY, Petitioner.
No. 07-6416.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 25, 2007.
Decided: June 1, 2007.
Andre Lamar Woody, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Andre Lamar Woody petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion for reconsideration. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act and permission to file his petition in forma pauperis. We find there has been no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant Woody's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny his petition for mandamus relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.