Case Name: STATE of Florida ex rel. CITY OF VERO BEACH, a Municipal Corporation in County of Indian River, State of Florida, Relator, v. A. C. MacCONNELL, City Clerk of City of Vero Beach, a Municipal Corporation, etc., Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1936-08-03
Citations: 169 So. 657
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE of Florida ex rel. CITY OF VERO BEACH, a Municipal Corporation in County of Indian River, State of Florida, Relator, v. A. C. MacCONNELL, City Clerk of City of Vero Beach, a Municipal Corporation, etc., Respondent.
Judges: • WHITFIELD, C. J., and TERRELL, BROWN, BUFORD, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter
Volume: 169
Pages: 657–658

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida ex rel. CITY OF VERO BEACH, a Municipal Corporation in County of Indian River, State of Florida, Relator, v. A. C. MacCONNELL, City Clerk of City of Vero Beach, a Municipal Corporation, etc., Respondent.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Aug. 3, 1936.
Vocelle •& Mitchell, of Vero Beach, for relator.
Ben C. Willis and Charles H. Spitz, both of Tallahassee, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is a companion case to that other case entitled State of Florida ex rel. City of Vero Beach, a Municipal Corporation, etc., Relator v. A. C. MacConnell, as City Clerk of City of Vero Beach, a Municipal Corporation, etc., Respondent, 169 So. 628; the only difference being that the revenue certificates in this case are sought to be issued against the net revenues of an electric power system, while in the other case they are sought to be issued against the net revenues of a water supply system. See Williams v. Town of Dunnellon (Fla.) 169 So. 631, filed this term.
On authority of the opinion and judgment in the above-mentioned case and cases therein cited, the motion to quash should be denied and the peremptory writ of mandamus should issue, and it is so ordered.
• WHITFIELD, C. J., and TERRELL, BROWN, BUFORD, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.