Case Name: Gabriel ARMENDARIZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jeff AURICCHIO, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-11-01
Citations: 700 F. App'x 730
Docket Number: No. 17-15752
Parties: Gabriel ARMENDARIZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jeff AURICCHIO, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before: LEAVY, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 700
Pages: 730–730

Head Matter:
Gabriel ARMENDARIZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jeff AURICCHIO, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 17-15752
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted October 23, 2017
Filed November 1, 2017
Gabriel Armendariz, Pro Se
Michele Molinario, Lori Lea Voepel, Attorneys, Donald L. Myles, Jr., Esquire, Attorney, Jones, Skelton & Hochuli, P.L.C., Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appel-lee
Before: LEAVY, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Gabriel Armendariz appeals pro se from the district court's summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging false arrest. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
Because Armendariz failed to raise any arguments regarding the basis for the district court's grant of summary judgment, he has waived any such challenge on appeal. See Smith v. Marsh, 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999) ("[Ojn appeal, arguments not raised by a party in its opening brief are deemed waived."); Greenwood v. FAA, 28 F.3d 971, 977 (9th Cir. 1994) ("We will not manufacture arguments for an appellant. .").
We do not consider arguments or allegations raised for the first time on appeal. See Smith, 194 F.3d at 1052 ("As a general rule, we will not consider arguments that are raised for the first time on appeal.").
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.