Case Name: In Re: George Paul LAROQUE, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-03-09
Citations: 315 F. App'x 453
Docket Number: No. 08-1919
Parties: In Re: George Paul LAROQUE, Petitioner.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Bankruptcy Reporter
Volume: 406
Pages: 453–454

Head Matter:
In Re: George Paul LAROQUE, Petitioner.
No. 08-1919.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 20, 2009.
Decided: March 9, 2009.
George Paul Laroque, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
George Paul Laroque petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his appeal from the bankruptcy court. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the docket sheet reveals that the district court denied Laroque's motions for injunctive relief on December 22, 2008, and consolidated the four appeals Laroque has filed in order to rule on his remaining outstanding motions on December 24, 2008. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Laroque's case, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.