Case Name: In the INTEREST OF F.E.S., Appellant, v. Juvenile OFFICER, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2019-02-26
Citations: 568 S.W.3d 546
Docket Number: WD 81523
Parties: In the INTEREST OF F.E.S., Appellant,
v.
Juvenile OFFICER, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 568
Pages: 546–547

Head Matter:
In the INTEREST OF F.E.S., Appellant,
v.
Juvenile OFFICER, Respondent.
WD 81523
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Filed: February 26, 2019
Craig A. Johnston, Columbia, for appellant.
Lori A. Fluegel and Elizabeth E. Walker, Kansas City for respondent.
Before Division Two: Alok Ahuja, P.J., and Thomas H. Newton and Mark D. Pfeiffer, JJ.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Following a bench trial in the Circuit Court of Jackson County, F.E.S. (a juvenile) was found to have committed acts which would have constituted the offense of unlawful use of a weapon if committed by an adult. The allegations stemmed from an incident in which a gun was found in a backpack belonging to F.E.S., at the middle school that he attended. The circuit court ordered that F.E.S. be committed to the custody of Family Court Services, but it suspended the execution of that commitment and placed F.E.S. on supervised probation in his mother's custody. F.E.S. appeals. He argues that there was insufficient evidence that he brought the gun into the school, as required by § 571.030.1(10), RSMo. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b)