Case Name: Bryant MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LIGHTSTORM ENTERTAINMENT, INC.; James Cameron; Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-12-05
Citations: 586 F. App'x 143
Docket Number: No. 14-1135
Parties: Bryant MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LIGHTSTORM ENTERTAINMENT, INC.; James Cameron; Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 586
Pages: 143–143

Head Matter:
Bryant MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LIGHTSTORM ENTERTAINMENT, INC.; James Cameron; Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 14-1135.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 26, 2014.
Decided: Dec. 5, 2014.
• Bruce S. Rogow, Tara A. Campion, Bruce S. Rogow, PA, Fort Lauderdale, Florida; Bradley A. Thomas, The Law Office Of Bradley A. Thomas, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Robert H. Rotstein, Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP, Los Angeles, California, J. Matthew Williams, Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP, Washington, D.C, for Appellees.
Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Bryant Moore appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellees on Moore's claims of copyright infringement. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See generally Moore v. Lightstorm Entm't, Inc., 992 F.Supp.2d 543 (D.Md.2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.