Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ernest PERRY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-02-22
Citations: 510 F. App'x 291
Docket Number: No. 12-7602
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ernest PERRY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 510
Pages: 291–291

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ernest PERRY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-7602.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 1, 2013.
Decided: Feb. 22, 2013.
Ernest Perry, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appel-lee.
Before KING, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ernest Perry appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Perry, No. 3:08-cr-00399-HEH-1 (E.D.Va. Sept. 10, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.