Case Name: Thomas A. Perchinsky, Appellant, v. State of New York, Respondent. (Action No. 1.); Thomas A. Perchinsky, Appellant-Respondent, v. Granny "G" Productions, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent-Appellant, and Richard Faust, as President of Binghamton Lions Club, et al., Respondents. Todd Perchinsky, Doing Business as Todd's Kite World, Third-Party Defendant; Lemon Enterprises, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent. (Action No. 2.)
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1997-11-20
Citations: 91 N.Y.2d 830
Docket Number: 
Parties: Thomas A. Perchinsky, Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent. (Action No. 1.) Thomas A. Perchinsky, Appellant-Respondent, v Granny "G" Productions, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent-Appellant, and Richard Faust, as President of Binghamton Lions Club, et al., Respondents. Todd Perchinsky, Doing Business as Todd’s Kite World, Third-Party Defendant; Lemon Enterprises, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent. (Action No. 2.)
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 91
Pages: 830–830

Head Matter:
Thomas A. Perchinsky, Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent. (Action No. 1.) Thomas A. Perchinsky, Appellant-Respondent, v Granny "G" Productions, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent-Appellant, and Richard Faust, as President of Binghamton Lions Club, et al., Respondents. Todd Perchinsky, Doing Business as Todd’s Kite World, Third-Party Defendant; Lemon Enterprises, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent. (Action No. 2.)
Submitted August 18, 1997;
decided November 20, 1997

Opinion:
Motion by Perchinsky, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed the Court of Claims judgment and order in action No. 1, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied. Motion by Granny "G" Productions, Inc. for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine action No. 2 within the meaning of the Constitution.