Case Name: In the Matter of Meryl Brodsky, Appellant, et al., Petitioners v. New York City Campaign Finance Board, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2014-12-30
Citations: 123 A.D.3d 637
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Meryl Brodsky, Appellant, et al., Petitioners v New York City Campaign Finance Board, Respondent.
Judges: Concur — Acosta, J.P., Moskowitz, Richter and Clark, JJ.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 123
Pages: 637–637

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Meryl Brodsky, Appellant, et al., Petitioners v New York City Campaign Finance Board, Respondent.
[999 NYS2d 417]

Opinion:
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen A. Rakower, J.), entered August 31, 2009, directing petitioner to remit to respondent an aggregate amount of $35,850, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
This Court has rejected petitioner's prior efforts pro se to vacate the underlying judgment, on the ground, among other things, that she has not been prejudiced by any technical defects in the judgment (see 80 AD3d 495 [1st Dept 2011]). Petitioner's renewed attempts to vacate the judgment and collaterally attack the prior ruling holding her personally liable for the repayments owed to respondent are barred by the doctrines of res judicata and law of the case, and are otherwise without merit (see 107 AD3d 544 [1st Dept 2013]).
Concur — Acosta, J.P., Moskowitz, Richter and Clark, JJ.