Case Name: Marlene C. MORRISON and George Morrison h/w Appellants, v. David J. SPEARS, The Borough of Lansdale and Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation
Court: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1982-04-23
Citations: 298 Pa. Super. 521
Docket Number: No. 2125
Parties: Marlene C. MORRISON and George Morrison h/w Appellants, v. David J. SPEARS, The Borough of Lansdale and Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation.
Judges: Before SPAETH, BECK and LIPEZ, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania Superior Court Reports
Volume: 298
Pages: 521–524

Head Matter:
445 A.2d 110
Marlene C. MORRISON and George Morrison h/w Appellants, v. David J. SPEARS, The Borough of Lansdale and Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued Nov. 4, 1981.
Filed April 23, 1982.
Petition for Allowance of Appeal Denied Sept. 10,1982.
James E. Beasley, Philadelphia, for appellants.
John M. McNally, Jr., Philadelphia, for appellees.
Before SPAETH, BECK and LIPEZ, JJ.

Opinion:
BECK, Judge:
This appeal arises from an action in trespass to recover for personal injuries suffered by Marlene Morrison when a car carrying her husband, George Morrison, and herself collided with that of David Spears at an intersection in Lansdale, Pennsylvania on July 12, 1979. Plaintiffs, Marlene and George Morrison, allege negligent design of the intersection and defective traffic signals as contributing causes. Plaintiffs brought suit in Philadelphia County against Spears, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transporta tion, and the Borough of Lansdale. The Borough filed preliminary objections, moving to dismiss for improper venue. The lower court thereafter transferred the case to Montgomery County. Plaintiffs appealed from the order of transfer and filed a Petition for Reconsideration which was denied.
Appellants argue that the trial should take place in Philadelphia County. We note that the accident occurred in Montgomery County, the Morrisons and Mr. Spears live in Montgomery County, and the Borough of Lansdale is situated in Montgomery County. We add parenthetically that this case has but one tenuous link to Philadelphia County: the Department of Transportation has an office in Philadelphia. The lower court noted that this defendant also maintains offices in Montgomery County.
It appears that venue in this case was properly transferred pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 2103(b) and 1006(c). The former states:
Except when the Commonwealth is the plaintiff or when otherwise provided by an Act of Assembly, an action against a political subdivision may be brought only in the county in which the political subdivision is located. Appellants assert that where there are multiple defend-
ants, Pa.R.C.P. 1006(c) controls. That rule states:
An action to enforce a joint or joint and several liability against two or more defendants, except actions in which the Commonwealth is a party defendant, may be brought against all defendants in any county in which the venue may be laid against any one of the defendants under the general rules of Subdivisions (a) or (b).
(Emphasis added.)
Appellants cite Peaceman v. Cades, 272 Pa.Super. 568, 416 A.2d 1042 (1979), for the proposition that where there are multiple defendants "a political subdivision may be sued in a county other than where it is located." Id., 272 Pa.Super. at 572, 416 A.2d at 1044. That case, however, did not involve the Commonwealth as a party. The Peaceman court cor rectly concluded that when the Commonwealth is not a party and there are two or more defendants, the action may be brought in any county in which any one of them may be served. But it is apparent that when the Commonwealth is a party, as in the instant case, venue in an action against a political subdivision is governed by Rule 2103(b). Therefore, venue was transferred properly to Montgomery County wherein the political subdivision of Lansdale is located.
Order of the lower court is affirmed.
SPAETH, J., files a dissenting opinion.