Case Name: CITY OF KLAMATH FALLS, a municipal corporation, Appellant, v. OREGON DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY and Oregon Environmental Quality Commission, agencies of the State of Oregon, Respondents
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1993-04-21
Citations: 119 Or. App. 500
Docket Number: 9104083-CV; CA A75570
Parties: CITY OF KLAMATH FALLS, a municipal corporation, Appellant, v. OREGON DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY and Oregon Environmental Quality Commission, agencies of the State of Oregon, Respondents.
Judges: Before Richardson, Chief Judge, and Rossman and Riggs, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 119
Pages: 500–501

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted March 3,
affirmed April 21,
reconsideration denied June 9, petition for review denied July 27,1993 (317 Or 271)
CITY OF KLAMATH FALLS, a municipal corporation, Appellant, v. OREGON DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY and Oregon Environmental Quality Commission, agencies of the State of Oregon, Respondents.
(9104083-CV; CA A75570)
851 P2d 607
Peter Glaser, Washington, D.C., argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Doherty, Rumble & Butler, Washington, D. C. and Richard M. Glick, Shelley Larkins and Davis Wright Tremaine, Portland.
John T. Bagg, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.
Before Richardson, Chief Judge, and Rossman and Riggs, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
The City of Klamath Falls appeals from the trial court's dismissal of its declaratory judgment action, in which it contended that the Department of Environmental Quality and the Environmental Quality Commission (EQC) had failed to act within one year of the city's request for water quality certification for a hydroelectric project, and had thereby waived the certification requirement. The trial court held that it lacked jurisdiction and that exclusive jurisdiction over the issue was in this court, as part of our review of EQC's final contested case order under ORS 183.482. The trial court was correct, and we have decided the issue in City of Klamath Falls v. Environ. Quality Comm., 119 Or App 375, 851 P2d 602 (1993).
Affirmed.