Case Name: Calvin Lyndale GADDY, a/k/a Calvin L. Gaddy, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Captain DeGEORGIS, Defendant-Appellee, and Nikki R. Haley, South Carolina Governor; Bill Byers, SCDC Commissioner; Warden Larry Cartledge, Perry CI; Florence Mauney, Perry CI, SMU; Major Early, Perry CI, SMU, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-10-02
Citations: 616 F. App'x 640
Docket Number: No. 15-6660
Parties: Calvin Lyndale GADDY, a/k/a Calvin L. Gaddy, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Captain DeGEORGIS, Defendant-Appellee, and Nikki R. Haley, South Carolina Governor; Bill Byers, SCDC Commissioner; Warden Larry Cartledge, Perry CI; Florence Mauney, Perry CI, SMU; Major Early, Perry CI, SMU, Defendants.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 616
Pages: 640–640

Head Matter:
Calvin Lyndale GADDY, a/k/a Calvin L. Gaddy, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Captain DeGEORGIS, Defendant-Appellee, and Nikki R. Haley, South Carolina Governor; Bill Byers, SCDC Commissioner; Warden Larry Cartledge, Perry CI; Florence Mauney, Perry CI, SMU; Major Early, Perry CI, SMU, Defendants.
No. 15-6660.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 29, 2015.
Decided: Oct. 2, 2015.
Calvin Lyndale Gaddy, Appellant Pro Se. James Victor McDade, Doyle, O’Rourke, Tate & McDade, PA, Anderson, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Calvin Lyndale Gaddy appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. On appeal, we confíne our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Gaddy's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, Gaddy has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We deny Gaddy's motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.