Case Name: J. Gerard LEGAGNEUR, Jr., et al., Appellants, v. M & J FILM PRODUCTION, LLC, etc., et al., Appellees.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2019-06-05
Citations: 274 So. 3d 497
Docket Number: No. 3D18-2576
Parties: J. Gerard LEGAGNEUR, Jr., et al., Appellants,
v.
M & J FILM PRODUCTION, LLC, etc., et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before SALTER, SCALES and MILLER, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 274
Pages: 497–498

Head Matter:
J. Gerard LEGAGNEUR, Jr., et al., Appellants,
v.
M & J FILM PRODUCTION, LLC, etc., et al., Appellees.
No. 3D18-2576
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Opinion filed June 5, 2019
J. Gerard Legagneur, Jr., for appellants.
PinoNicholson, PLLC, and Laurence J. Pino (Orlando), for appellees.
Before SALTER, SCALES and MILLER, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) ("When there are issues of fact the appellant necessarily asks the reviewing court to draw conclusions about the evidence. Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory. Without knowing the factual context, neither can an appellate court reasonably conclude that the trial judge so misconceived the law as to require reversal.").