Case Name: IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ALEXANDER OGILVIE FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
Court: Utah Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Utah
Decision Date: 1895-02-23
Citations: 11 Utah 290
Docket Number: No. 568
Parties: IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ALEXANDER OGILVIE FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS.
Judges: Merritt, C. J., and Shith, J., concur.
Reporter: Utah Reports
Volume: 11
Pages: 290–291

Head Matter:
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ALEXANDER OGILVIE FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS.
(No. 568.
Decided Feb. 23, 1895.
39 P. R. 498.)
Original application for a writ of hateas corpus by Alexander Ogilvie who was convicted of grand larceny in the First Judicial District for stealing live stock, and sentenced to the penitentiary.
Writ denied.
Mr. D. D. Hultz and Mr. 8. A. King, for petitioner.
Mr. J. W. Judd, U. S. Attorney, contra.

Opinion:
Bartoh, J.:
The petitioner in this case was indicted in the District «Court of the First Judicial District, jointly with the petitioner in the case of In re Gannett (decided at this term) ante, 283, 39 Pac. 496, for the crime of grand larceny, He was tried separately, convicted, and sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of two years. The facts are the same in both cases and piecisely the same legal questions are involved, and therefore, for our decision •of all the questions raised hy the record in this case, we refer to the opinion in Re Gannett. On the authority of that case, the application for the writ herein is denied.
Merritt, C. J., and Shith, J., concur.