Case Name: Ben Bimberg & Co., Inc., and Others, Respondents, v. Unity Coat & Apron Co., Inc., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1933-12
Citations: 240 A.D. 959
Docket Number: 
Parties: Ben Bimberg & Co., Inc., and Others, Respondents, v. Unity Coat & Apron Co., Inc., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 240
Pages: 959–959

Head Matter:
Ben Bimberg & Co., Inc., and Others, Respondents, v. Unity Coat & Apron Co., Inc., Appellant.

Opinion:
Order affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. The complaint on its face does not show that the stock of merchandise which was the subject of the transfer was not intended for resale in the regular conduct of the business of the transferor. The admissions made by plaintiffs in the affidavits on the application for summary judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, which were especially limited to the purposes of that motion, cannot be used by defendant here. Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.