Case Name: ESSO STANDARD OIL COMPANY ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, v. CARL HOLDERMAN, COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT; NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS CASUALTY INSURANCE CO. ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, v. CARL HOLDERMAN, COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT; NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS CASUALTY INSURANCE CO. ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, v. RAYMOND F. MALE, COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1963-03-04
Citations: 39 N.J. 355
Docket Number: 
Parties: ESSO STANDARD OIL COMPANY ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, v. CARL HOLDERMAN, COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS CASUALTY INSURANCE CO. ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, v. CARL HOLDERMAN, COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS CASUALTY INSURANCE CO. ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, v. RAYMOND F. MALE, COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 39
Pages: 355–356

Head Matter:
ESSO STANDARD OIL COMPANY ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, v. CARL HOLDERMAN, COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS CASUALTY INSURANCE CO. ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, v. CARL HOLDERMAN, COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS CASUALTY INSURANCE CO. ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, v. RAYMOND F. MALE, COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT.
Argued February 18, 1963
Decided March 4, 1963.
Mr. John W. Fritz and Mr. Edward B. Meredith argued the cause for -the appellants (Messrs. Wharton, Stewart & Davis, attorneys).
Mr. Theodore I. Bolter argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General, attorney).

Opinion:
Pee Cueiam.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Conford in the Appellate Division.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weirteaub, and Justices Jacobs, Eearcis, Peoctoe, Schettiro and Haremar — 6.
For reversal — None.