Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Springfield Development Company, Inc., Appellant; The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Hill Development Company, Inc., Appellant; The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Springfield Development Company, Inc., Appellant; The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Hill Development Company, Inc., Appellant; The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Charles Rosen, Correct Name Chill Rosenblatt, Appellant; The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Marcus Retter, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1956-02-16
Citations: 309 N.Y. 1015
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Springfield Development Company, Inc., Appellant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Hill Development Company, Inc., Appellant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Springfield Development Company, Inc., Appellant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Hill Development Company, Inc., Appellant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Charles Rosen, Correct Name Chill Rosenblatt, Appellant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Marcus Retter, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 309
Pages: 1015–1017

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Springfield Development Company, Inc., Appellant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Hill Development Company, Inc., Appellant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Springfield Development Company, Inc., Appellant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Hill Development Company, Inc., Appellant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Charles Rosen, Correct Name Chill Rosenblatt, Appellant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Marcus Retter, Appellant.
Argued November 28, 1955;
decided February 16, 1956.
Menahem Stim and Allen 8. Stim for appellants.
T. Vincent Quinn, District Attorney (George J. Regan of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
In each case: Judgment affirmed; no opinion.
Concur: Conway, Ch. J., Desmond, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis and Burke, JJ. Taking no part: Dye, J.