Case Name: Charles M. SCISSORS et ux., Appellants, v. SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1975-04-08
Citations: 311 So. 2d 708
Docket Number: No. 74-393
Parties: Charles M. SCISSORS et ux., Appellants, v. SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before PEARSON, HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 311
Pages: 708–708

Head Matter:
Charles M. SCISSORS et ux., Appellants, v. SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY et al., Appellees.
No. 74-393.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 8, 1975.
Rehearing Denied May 13, 1975.
Horton, Perse & Ginsberg, Welsh & Carroll, Miami, for appellants.
Smathers & Thompson and Paul M. Stokes, Miami, for appellees.
Before PEARSON, HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The plaintiff appeals a final judgment pursuant to a j'ury verdict in a negligence case. The only substantial point argued is that the court erred in charging the jury as to a county ordinance. We find no error because a party is entitled to an instruction in accordance with the law if there is evidence in the record which the jury could have believed in forming a basis for the matters instructed upon. See Smith v. Johnson, Fla.App. 1966, 187 So.2d 655.
Affirmed.