Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Barry Lee SAUNDERS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-02-06
Citations: 26 F. App'x 333
Docket Number: No. 01-7402
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Barry Lee SAUNDERS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 26
Pages: 333–334

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Barry Lee SAUNDERS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 01-7402.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 31, 2002.
Decided Feb. 6, 2002.
Barry Lee Saunders, Pro Se. Stuart A. Berman, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Barry Lee Saunders seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion for leave to file an untimely motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001) and denying his motion for a downward departure pursuant to U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 3E1.1. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because Saunders's notice of appeal was not timely filed.
Parties are accorded sixty days after entry of the district court's final judgment or order to note an appeal, see Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (I960)).
The district court's order was entered on the docket on May 11, 2001. Saunders's notice of appeal was filed on August 20, 2001. Because Saunders failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.