Case Name: Janie THOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Russell BROWN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-11-22
Citations: 154 F. App'x 407
Docket Number: No. 05-1195, 05-1417, 05-1439
Parties: Janie THOMAS, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Russell BROWN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 154
Pages: 407–408

Head Matter:
Janie THOMAS, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Russell BROWN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-1195, 05-1417, 05-1439.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 26, 2005.
Decided: Nov. 22, 2005.
Russell Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Fleet Freeman, Freeman & Freeman, Mount Pleasant, South Carolina; Richard Allan Hricik, The Law Offices of Richard A. Hricik, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Russell Brown appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to plaintiff, and the district court's subsequent orders entering judgment on the jury's verdict on damages, granting plaintiffs motions to strike his interlocutory notices of appeal, and denying his motion and amended motion for stay of execution of the judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Thomas v. Brown, No. CA-03-3846-2-23-PMD (D.S.C. Mar. 4, 11 & 15, 2005; Apr. 6, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED