Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James Arroyo, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1995-11-06
Citations: 221 A.D.2d 347
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Arroyo, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 221
Pages: 347–348

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Arroyo, Appellant.
[633 NYS2d 1004]

Opinion:
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (J. Goldberg, J.), rendered May 3, 1994, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second degree, and assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant has not preserved for appellate review his claim that the prosecutor's remarks during cross examination and summation constituted reversible error (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Tardbania, 72 NY2d 852). In any event, most of the prosecutor's remarks were proper responses to the defendant's summation and within the rhetorical bounds permitted during closing arguments (see, People v Galloway, 54 NY2d 396). Any improper remarks were harmless and do not constitute reversible error in light of the court's prompt curative instructions and the overwhelming evidence of the defendant's guilt (see, People v Galloway, supra; People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230). Sullivan, J. P., Altman, Hart and Friedmann, JJ., concur.