Case Name: Daniel Eugene REMETA v. STATE of Arkansas
Court: Arkansas Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Arkansas
Decision Date: 1988-12-19
Citations: 297 Ark. 391
Docket Number: CR 87-214
Parties: Daniel Eugene REMETA v. STATE of Arkansas
Judges: Purtle, J., would grant.
Reporter: Arkansas Reports
Volume: 297
Pages: 391–392

Head Matter:
Daniel Eugene REMETA v. STATE of Arkansas
CR 87-214
761 S.W.2d 606
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Opinion delivered December 19, 1988
J. Randolph Shock, for appellant.
Steve Clark, Att’y Gen., by: Jack Gillean, Asst. Att’y Gen., for appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The appellant, Daniel Eugene Remeta, moves to be appointed co-counsel in his appeal and to be allowed to argue orally in person. Those motions are denied. We deny as well his motion to supplement the brief to be filed by his attorney. However, we note that if, after his attorney's brief is filed, Remeta files a motion demonstrating that his attorney's brief is inadequate he may be permitted to file a supplemental brief, pro se. See Wade v. State, 288 Ark. 94, 702 S.W.2d 28 (1986).
We also deny, without prejudice, Remeta's request to be allowed additional pages in the argument portion of his brief. See Pemberton v. State, 291 Ark. 198, 723 S.W.2d 372 (1987).
The brief to be filed by Remeta's attorney is due in sixty days.
Purtle, J., would grant.