Case Name: Lenton CHAMBERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1978-01-20
Citations: 353 So. 2d 1279
Docket Number: No. 77-976
Parties: Lenton CHAMBERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: HOBSON, Acting C. J., and GRIMES and OTT, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 353
Pages: 1279–1279

Head Matter:
Lenton CHAMBERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 77-976.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Jan. 20, 1978.
Jack O. Johnson, Public Defender, Bar-tow, and Douglas A. Wallace, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Mary Jo M. Gallay, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The judgment appealed from is affirmed, but this case is remanded for resentencing of appellant. The present sentence does not specifically set forth the period of credit timé to be allowed as required by Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1975); Brooks v. State, 349 So.2d 794 (Fla.2d DCA 1977). Moreover the phrase "at hard labor" in the sentence is improper. Brooks v. State, supra. The appellant does not have to be present at resentencing.
HOBSON, Acting C. J., and GRIMES and OTT, JJ., concur.