Case Name: In the Interest of S.Y.G. & M.M.G., Plaintiff. Juvenile Officer, Respondent; Missouri Children's Division, Respondent, v. D.L.D. (Mother), Appellant; T.L.G. (Father), Defendant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2007-08-28
Citations: 231 S.W.3d 324
Docket Number: Nos. WD 67677, WD 67678
Parties: In the Interest of S.Y.G. & M.M.G., Plaintiff. Juvenile Officer, Respondent; Missouri Children’s Division, Respondent, v. D.L.D. (Mother), Appellant; T.L.G. (Father), Defendant.
Judges: Before HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, P.J., JAMES M. SMART, JR., and LISA WHITE HARDWICK, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 231
Pages: 324–324

Head Matter:
In the Interest of S.Y.G. & M.M.G., Plaintiff. Juvenile Officer, Respondent; Missouri Children’s Division, Respondent, v. D.L.D. (Mother), Appellant; T.L.G. (Father), Defendant.
Nos. WD 67677, WD 67678.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Aug. 28, 2007.
Joshua Fay, Brookfield, MO, for Appellant.
Steven Eugene Raymond, Shelbyville, MO, for Respondent Juvenile Officer.
Gary Lee Gardner, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent Children Division.
Susan Ruth Barrow, Macon, MO, for Plaintiffs.
Andrew J.S.D. Snider, Shelbina, MO, for Defendant T.L.G.
Before HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, P.J., JAMES M. SMART, JR., and LISA WHITE HARDWICK, JJ.

Opinion:
Order
PER CURIAM.
D.L.D. appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court, Juvenile Division, terminating her parental rights as to her two children, S.Y.G. and M.M.G.
Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).