Case Name: Israel Tomas MARQUEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1988-11-29
Citations: 534 So. 2d 815
Docket Number: No. 88-518
Parties: Israel Tomas MARQUEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before HUBBART, DANIEL S. PEARSON, and FERGUSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 534
Pages: 815–815

Head Matter:
Israel Tomas MARQUEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 88-518.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 29, 1988.
Israel Marquez, in pro. per.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Richard L. Polin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.
Before HUBBART, DANIEL S. PEARSON, and FERGUSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
A sentencing pursuant to agreements that gave credit for all time served and orders that the sentence was to run concurrent with a sentence imposed in a different county for different offenses does not include, as a matter of law, a credit for time served in the other jurisdiction. Besides, it is clear from the record of the plea colloquy that the appellant was to receive credit only for the time served in Dade County. The State concedes, however, that the time served in Dade County was forty-two rather than the thirty-two days credited.
The remaining points in this pro se appeal are either without merit or are not reviewable by appeal of the sentencing order.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for correction of the sentence in accordance with the confession of error.