Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Ray WALLACE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-04-08
Citations: 92 F. App'x 985
Docket Number: No. 03-10581
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Ray WALLACE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before JONES, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 92
Pages: 985–986

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Ray WALLACE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 03-10581.
Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
DECIDED: April 8, 2004.
Floyd Clardy, US Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Patrick R Cowlishaw, Jackson Walker, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before JONES, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
David Ray Wallace appeals from his jury-trial conviction and sentence for possession of a firearm by a felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), 924(e). Wallace argues that the district court erred in finding that he consented to a search of his person. The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prevailing party, supports the district court's findings and denial of Wallace's motion to suppress. See United States v. Shelton, 337 F.3d 529, 532, petition for cert. —U.S.-, 124 S.Ct. 1507, 158 L.Ed.2d 172 (2003) (No. 03-781).
Wallace further argues that the district court erred in enhancing his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). This court reviews the issue de novo. See United States v. Martinez-Cortez, 988 F.2d 1408, 1410 (5th Cir.1993). The presentence report reveals that Wallace had three convictions for aggravated robbery which served as predicate offenses for the sentence enhancement. See United States v. Munoz, 150 F.3d 401, 419 (5th Cir.1998). The district court did not err.
Finally, Wallace challenges the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). He concedes that his argument is foreclosed by circuit precedent. This court has repeatedly held that the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) is not open to question. United States v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir.2001).
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.