Case Name: ORLANDO CENTRAL PARK, INC., Appellant, v. MASTER DOOR COMPANY OF ORLANDO, INC., a Florida Corporation, and Brody Construction, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1976-10-15
Citations: 338 So. 2d 259
Docket Number: Nos. 75-2141 and 76-108
Parties: ORLANDO CENTRAL PARK, INC., Appellant, v. MASTER DOOR COMPANY OF ORLANDO, INC., a Florida Corporation, and Brody Construction, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Appellees.
Judges: MAGER, C. J., and CROSS and DOW-NEY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 338
Pages: 259–260

Head Matter:
ORLANDO CENTRAL PARK, INC., Appellant, v. MASTER DOOR COMPANY OF ORLANDO, INC., a Florida Corporation, and Brody Construction, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Appellees.
Nos. 75-2141 and 76-108.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Oct. 15, 1976.
Patricia C. Fawsett and George T. Eid-son, Jr., Akerman, Senterfitt, Eidson & Wharton, Orlando, for appellant.
Charles J. Collins, Jr., Steed & Collins, Orlando, for appellee-Master Door Co. of Orlando, Inc.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We consolidate for the purpose of review and disposition interlocutory appeals cases 75-2141 and 76-108.
Upon review of the record on appeal and briefs of the respective parties, we determine that the trial court erred in failing to grant appellant-defendant's motion to dismiss appellee-plaintiff's second amended complaint for it fails to state a cause of action sufficient to establish an equitable lien, or for the equity remedy of reformation. Accordingly, the order appealed in Case No. 75-2141 is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to dismiss appellee-plaintiff's second amended complaint with prejudice. Case No. 76 — 108 is dismissed as rendered moot by the disposition of Case No. 75-2141.
Reversed and remanded, with directions.
MAGER, C. J., and CROSS and DOW-NEY, JJ., concur.