Case Name: Hubert FORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2013-11-26
Citations: 415 S.W.3d 138
Docket Number: No. ED 99173
Parties: Hubert FORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before: LISA S. VAN AMBURG, P.J., PATRICIA L. COHEN, J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, Jr., J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 415
Pages: 138–138

Head Matter:
Hubert FORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 99173.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Nov. 26, 2013.
Timothy Forneris, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Todd T. Smith, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before: LISA S. VAN AMBURG, P.J., PATRICIA L. COHEN, J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, Jr., J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Hubert Ford appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court's denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2013, unless otherwise indicated.