Case Name: Vincent A. HOLLY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2006-05-15
Citations: 929 So. 2d 648
Docket Number: No. 1D06-0419
Parties: Vincent A. HOLLY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: DAVIS, POLSTON, and THOMAS, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 929
Pages: 648–648

Head Matter:
Vincent A. HOLLY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 1D06-0419.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
May 15, 2006.
Vincent A. Holly, pro se, Petitionér.
Charlie Crist, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In light of the circuit court's recent issuance of an order to show cause' and the filing of a response below, we conclude that the granting of mandamus relief is not warranted. We do, however, encourage the circuit court to promptly rule on the merits of the claim before it. Munn v. Florida Parole Comm., 807 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).
PETITION DENIED.
DAVIS, POLSTON, and THOMAS, JJ., Concur.