Case Name: ROBERT SIPKO, PLAINTIFF, v. ROGER, INC., ROGER DISTRIBUTED SOLUTIONS, INC., ROGER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC., ROGER LIMITED (DUBLIN), RASTISLAV SIPKO AND GEORGE SIPKO, DEFENDANTS-MOVANTS
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 2012-03-22
Citations: 210 N.J. 25
Docket Number: 
Parties: ROBERT SIPKO, PLAINTIFF, v. ROGER, INC., ROGER DISTRIBUTED SOLUTIONS, INC., ROGER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC., ROGER LIMITED (DUBLIN), RASTISLAV SIPKO AND GEORGE SIPKO, DEFENDANTS-MOVANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 210
Pages: 25–25

Head Matter:
40 A.3d 55
ROBERT SIPKO, PLAINTIFF, v. ROGER, INC., ROGER DISTRIBUTED SOLUTIONS, INC., ROGER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC., ROGER LIMITED (DUBLIN), RASTISLAV SIPKO AND GEORGE SIPKO, DEFENDANTS-MOVANTS.
March 22, 2012.

Opinion:
This matter having been duly presented to the Court, it is ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration is granted, and defendants' cross-petition for certification in C-304-11 is hereby granted, limited to the issue whether plaintiff retains fifty percent ownership of Roger Professional Services and Roger Distributed Solutions.