Case Name: H. F. Booth et al., Resp'ts, v. Albert B. Simpson et al., App'lts
Court: New York Court of Common Pleas
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1892-03-07
Citations: 45 N.Y. St. Rep. 104
Docket Number: 
Parties: H. F. Booth et al., Resp’ts, v. Albert B. Simpson et al., App’lts.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 45
Pages: 104–105

Head Matter:
H. F. Booth et al., Resp’ts, v. Albert B. Simpson et al., App’lts.
(New York Common Pleas, General Term,
Filed March 7, 1892.)
Appeal—Judgment.
Where the question litigated was one of fact and the judgment was rendered on a conflict of evidence the appellate court will not reverse unless the evidence so greatly preponderated in favor of the appellant that its disregard amounted to a perversion of justice.
Appellants’ motion for reargument of appeal.
W. F. Gleason, for motion; T. G. O Reilly, opposed.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The question litigated in the court below was one of fact and the judgment appealed, from was rendered upon a conflict of evidence. In such a case this court will not reverse unless the evidence so greatly preponderated in favor of the appellant that its disregard amounted to a perversion of justice. Upon an examination of the record we cannot say that injustice has been done the appellants and this motion must therefore be denied.
Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
Daly, Ch. J., Bischoff and Pryor, JJ., concur.