Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hector CIRINO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-07-03
Citations: 234 F. App'x 748
Docket Number: No. 05-10795
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hector CIRINO, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 234
Pages: 748–748

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hector CIRINO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-10795.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Feb. 13, 2007.
Submission withdrawn on Feb. 20, 2007.
Resubmitted on June 29, 2007.
Filed July 3, 2007.
Pamela A. Martin, Timothy S. Vasquez, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Jason F. Carr, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: B. FLETCHER, CLIFTON, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
On Ameline remand from this court, the district court determined that the sentence it originally imposed would not have been materially different under an advisory guidelines system. See United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1074-75 (9th Cir. 2005) (en banc). Because the record establishes that the district court understood its authority on remand to apply a non-Guidelines sentence, the district court's determination is reasonable. United States v. Combs, 470 F.3d 1294, 1297 (9th Cir. 2006) .
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.