Case Name: Nazario LIMON-PEREZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-04-12
Citations: 373 F. App'x 818
Docket Number: No. 07-72978
Parties: Nazario LIMON-PEREZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: RYMER, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 373
Pages: 818–818

Head Matter:
Nazario LIMON-PEREZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 07-72978.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 5, 2010.
Filed April 12, 2010.
Keli M. Reynolds, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.
Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Anthony John Messuri, Esquire, Trial, Oil, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: RYMER, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Nazario Limon-Perez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order vacating an immigration judge's decision granting his application for cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the BIA's continuous physical presence determination. Landin-Zavala v. Gonzales, 488 F.3d 1150, 1151 (9th Cir.2007). We deny the petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the BIA's determination that Limon-Perez did not meet the continuous physical presence requirement because the record shows he was placed in exclusion proceedings in 1996 and ordered excluded. See Landin-Zavala, 488 F.3d at 1153 (deportation under a formal exclusion order breaks an applicant's continuous physical presence).
Because Limon-Perez failed to demonstrate a gross miscarriage of justice, he may not, at this point, collaterally attack his June 13, 1996, exclusion order. See Ramirez-Juarez v. INS, 633 F.2d 174, 175-76 (9th Cir.1980) (per curiam).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.