Case Name: In the Matter of Bloomingdale Brothers, a Division of Federated Department Stores, Inc., Petitioner, v. Roderick G. W. Chu et al., Constituting the State Tax Commission of the Department of Taxation and Finance of the State of New York, Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1986-11-10
Citations: 124 A.D.2d 851
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Bloomingdale Brothers, a Division of Federated Department Stores, Inc., Petitioner, v Roderick G. W. Chu et al., Constituting the State Tax Commission of the Department of Taxation and Finance of the State of New York, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 124
Pages: 851–851

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Bloomingdale Brothers, a Division of Federated Department Stores, Inc., Petitioner, v Roderick G. W. Chu et al., Constituting the State Tax Commission of the Department of Taxation and Finance of the State of New York, Respondents.

Opinion:
No issue of fact was considered by this court. Pursuant to CPLR 5713, this court certifies that the following question of law, decisive of the correctness of its determination, has arisen, which in its opinion, ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals: "Did this court err as a matter of law in annulling the determination, granting the petition and remitting the matter to respondents for further proceedings not inconsistent with this court's decision". Kane, J. P., Casey, Mikoll and Levine, JJ., concur.