Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Glenn Allen WALLS, II, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-09-20
Citations: 479 F. App'x 798
Docket Number: No. 12-30045
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Glenn Allen WALLS, II, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 479
Pages: 798–799

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Glenn Allen WALLS, II, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-30045.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 10, 2012.
Filed Sept. 20, 2012.
Kevin Feldis, Jo Ann Farrington, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Anchorage, AK, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Glenn Allen Walls, II, Bruceton Mills, WV, pro se.
Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Glenn Allen Walls, II, appeals pro se from the district court's order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for reduction of sentence based on the retroactive amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines that lowered penalties for crack cocaine offenses. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Walls contends that the district court abused its discretion by declining to further reduce his sentence because of his post-sentencing prison disciplinary record. The district court properly considered this information in determining the extent to which it would reduce Walls's sentence. See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10 cmt. n. 1(B); United States v. Lightfoot, 626 F.3d 1092, 1096 (9th Cir.2010).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.