Case Name: David Charles ALSTON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Michael E. BUMGARNER, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-01-25
Citations: 2 F. App'x 360
Docket Number: No. 00-7651
Parties: David Charles ALSTON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Michael E. BUMGARNER, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 2
Pages: 360–360

Head Matter:
David Charles ALSTON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Michael E. BUMGARNER, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 00-7651.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 18, 2001.
Decided Jan. 25, 2001.
David Charles Alston, pro se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, NC, for appellee.
Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
David Charles Alston seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2000) and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Alston's motion for appointment of counsel on appeal, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Alston v. Bumgarner, No. CA-99-751-5-H (E.D .N.C. Sept. 19; Nov. 8, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.