Case Name: ALCOHOL MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ACTSOFT, INC., Ohio House Monitoring Systems, Inc. and U.S. Home Detention Systems and Equipment, Inc., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-03-01
Citations: 499 F. App'x 974
Docket Number: No. 2012-1066
Parties: ALCOHOL MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ACTSOFT, INC., Ohio House Monitoring Systems, Inc. and U.S. Home Detention Systems and Equipment, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: PROST, MOORE, and REYNA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 499
Pages: 974–975

Head Matter:
ALCOHOL MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ACTSOFT, INC., Ohio House Monitoring Systems, Inc. and U.S. Home Detention Systems and Equipment, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 2012-1066.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
March 1, 2013.
Michael G. Martin, Lathrop & Gage LLP, of Denver, CO, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Philip S. Lorenzo and James E. Dallner.
Kyle B. Fleming, Renner, Otto, Boisselle & Sklar, LLP, of Cleveland, OH, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were Todd R. Tucker and Nicholas J. Gingo, for Actsoft, Inc., et al. Of counsel on the brief were Richard E. Fee and Kathleen M. Wade, Fee & Jeffries P.A., of Tampa, FL, for Actsoft, Inc.
PROST, MOORE, and REYNA, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and Adjudged:
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.