Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arvin Bon Red STAR, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-10-05
Citations: 451 F. App'x 708
Docket Number: No. 10-30351
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arvin Bon Red STAR, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: HAWKINS, SILVERMAN, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 451
Pages: 708–709

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arvin Bon Red STAR, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-30351.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 27, 2011.
Filed Oct. 5, 2011.
Eric Vincent Carroll, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Great Falls, MT, Marcia Kay Hurd, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Leif Johnson, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Billings, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Evangelo Arvanetes, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Defenders of Montana, Great Falls, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: HAWKINS, SILVERMAN, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Arvin Bon Red Star appeals from his jury-trial conviction and 216-month sentence for aggravated sexual abuse, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1153(a) and 2241(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Red Star contends that the district court improperly applied a two-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 3A1.3 for restraining his victim during the commission of the offense. Red Star argues that there was no evidence of physical restraint presented at trial, and that any evidence of physical restraint had already been taken into account by the statute and the sentencing Guidelines.
The record supports the district court's application of the enhancement because the evidence shows that Red Star physically restrained the victim in such a way that "added to the basic crime." United States v. Old Chief, 571 F.3d 898, 901 (9th Cir.2009); United States v. Foppe, 993 F.2d 1444, 1452-53 (9th Cir.1993) (defining physical restraint). Restraint of the victim is not an element of the offense of aggravated sexual abuse nor was it was incorporated in the aggravated sexual abuse offense Guideline applied here. See 18 U.S.C. § 2241; U.S.S.G. § 2A3.1. Accordingly, the district court did not err by increasing Red Star's base offense level two levels under § 3A1.3. See U.S.S.G. § 3A1.3 cmt. n. 2; Old Chief, 571 F.3d at 900.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.