Case Name: Ramon Odin LAGOS-M, aka Antonio Cardona, aka Ramon Odin Lagos-Murillo, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Victor LORANTH, Doctor at Federal Correctional Institution Williamsburg, in Individual and Official Capacity; Donald F. Bauknecht, Warden at Federal Correctional Institution Williamsburg, in Individual and Official Capacity, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-12-27
Citations: 260 F. App'x 562
Docket Number: No. 07-7163
Parties: Ramon Odin LAGOS-M, aka Antonio Cardona, aka Ramon Odin Lagos-Murillo, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Victor LORANTH, Doctor at Federal Correctional Institution Williamsburg, in Individual and Official Capacity; Donald F. Bauknecht, Warden at Federal Correctional Institution Williamsburg, in Individual and Official Capacity, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 260
Pages: 562–562

Head Matter:
Ramon Odin LAGOS-M, aka Antonio Cardona, aka Ramon Odin Lagos-Murillo, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Victor LORANTH, Doctor at Federal Correctional Institution Williamsburg, in Individual and Official Capacity; Donald F. Bauknecht, Warden at Federal Correctional Institution Williamsburg, in Individual and Official Capacity, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 07-7163.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 20, 2007.
Decided Dec. 27, 2007.
Ramon Odin Lagos-M, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Ramon Odin Lagos-M, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000), for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lagos-M. v. Loranth, No. 9:07-cv-01409, 2007 WL 2105327 (D.S.C. July 19, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED