Case Name: John S. Moon, et als. v. Washington-Beaufort Land Company
Court: Special Court of Appeals of Virginia
Jurisdiction: Virginia
Decision Date: 1926-05-27
Citations: 147 Va. 919
Docket Number: No. 2
Parties: John S. Moon, et als. v. Washington-Beaufort Land Company.
Judges: 
Reporter: Virginia Reports
Volume: 147
Pages: 919–920

Head Matter:
Richmond.
John S. Moon, et als. v. Washington-Beaufort Land Company.
No. 2.
May 27, 1926.
The opinion states the case.
James E. Heath, for the plaintiffs in error.
Savage efe Lawerence, for the defendant in error.

Opinion:
Holt, J.,
delivered the opinion of the court.
This case is in all respects like that of John S. Moon and others v. Washington-Beaufort Land Company, this day decided, ante, page 912, 133 S. E. 498, save that it is an action on a note and not on account. The two were heard together. The evidence was the same and instructions were the same, but since the endorsers were not entitled to a judgment over, that entire recovery was transferred to the first case. The jury's verdict was: "We, the jury, find for the defendant." For the reasons stated it also must be reversed and remanded. These two should be again heard together and the single issue to be covered by one verdict should be the ascertainment of the actual value of the potatoes delivered and accepted.
Reversed and remanded.