Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Ronald RINGO, Appellant; Ronald RINGO, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1992-08-25
Citations: 838 S.W.2d 137
Docket Number: Nos. 56903, 59749
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Ronald RINGO, Appellant. Ronald RINGO, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 838
Pages: 137–137

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Ronald RINGO, Appellant. Ronald RINGO, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 56903, 59749.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Aug. 25, 1992.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Sept. 23, 1992.
Application to Transfer Denied Oct. 27, 1992.
Deborah B. Wafer, St. Louis, for appellant.
William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Robert P. Sass, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
A jury convicted defendant of assault, first degree and armed criminal action. The court sentenced him to fifteen years imprisonment on each charge, to be served concurrently. Defendant appealed from his convictions and sentences and from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. However, defendant did not file a brief in support of the latter appeal; therefore, that appeal is abandoned. Rule 30.06(d), (e).
An opinion on defendant's appeal from his convictions and sentences reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).