Case Name: The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Johnson, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1996-08-21
Citations: 76 Ohio St. 3d 397
Docket Number: No. 96-576
Parties: The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Johnson, Appellant.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Stratton, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 76
Pages: 397–398

Head Matter:
The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Johnson, Appellant.
[Cite as State v. Johnson (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 397.]
(No. 96-576
— Submitted July 10, 1996
— Decided August 21, 1996.)
Mathias H. Heck, Jr., Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney, and George A. Katchmer, Jr., Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
Bruce A. Johnson, pro se.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. Appellant has failed to establish "a genuine issue as to whether the applicant was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel on appeal," as required by App.R. 26(B)(5).
Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Stratton, JJ., concur.