Case Name: Zachary M. CARTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2019-01-15
Citations: 565 S.W.3d 760
Docket Number: No. ED 106103
Parties: Zachary M. CARTER, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J. and Mary K. Hoff, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 565
Pages: 760–760

Head Matter:
Zachary M. CARTER, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 106103
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Filed: January 15, 2019
FOR APPELLANT: Randall Brachman, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101.
FOR RESPONDENT: Julia E. Neidhardt, Assistant Attorney General, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.
Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J. and Mary K. Hoff, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Zachary Carter ("Movant") appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant's Rule 24.035 motion. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
All rule citations are to the Missouri Supreme Court Rules (2016) unless otherwise indicated.