Case Name: State of Connecticut v. Gary Lancaster
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1987-11-27
Citations: 13 Conn. App. 801
Docket Number: 5656
Parties: State of Connecticut v. Gary Lancaster
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Appellate Reports
Volume: 13
Pages: 739–739

Head Matter:
State of Connecticut v. Gary Lancaster
(5656)
Borden, Bieluch and O’Connell, Js.
Argued November 13 —
decision released November 27, 1987
Howard I. Gemeiner, for the appellant (defendant).
Carolyn K. Longstreth, deputy assistant state’s attorney, with whom were Robert Devlin, assistant state’s attorney, and, on the brief, Alice Osedach, legal intern, for the appellee (state).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
After a complete examination of the record, transcripts and briefs filed in this matter and after having afforded the defendant's sole claim of error the appropriate scope of review, we conclude that the defendant's claim is not reviewable because of the lack of an adequate record. This case is controlled by State v. Vitale, 190 Conn. 219, 226, 460 A.2d 961 (1983), and State v. Mitchell, 8 Conn. App. 598, 605, 513 A.2d 1268, cert. denied, 201 Conn. 810, 516 A.2d 887 (1986).
There is no error.