Case Name: Curtis BRYANT, Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, et al., Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2008-01-29
Citations: 250 S.W.3d 718
Docket Number: No. ED 89562
Parties: Curtis BRYANT, Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, et al., Respondents.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 250
Pages: 718–719

Head Matter:
Curtis BRYANT, Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, et al., Respondents.
No. ED 89562.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Jan. 29, 2008.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 10, 2008.
Application for Transfer Denied May 20, 2008.
Charles W. Bobinette, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Maribeth McMahon, Office of the City Counselor, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Curtis Bryant ("Bryant") appeals from the judgment upholding the decision of the Civil Service Commission of the City of St. Louis ("the Commission") to terminate Bryant's employment. Bryant contends the trial court erred in upholding Bryant's termination because the Commission's findings were not supported by substantial and competent evidence and were against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).