Case Name: James ASHLEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1994-09-28
Citations: 642 So. 2d 837
Docket Number: No. 93-2630
Parties: James ASHLEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, GERSTEN and GODERICH, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 642
Pages: 837–838

Head Matter:
James ASHLEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 93-2630.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Sept. 28, 1994.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Kenneth P. Speiller, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Angelica D. Zayas, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.
Before BARKDULL, GERSTEN and GODERICH, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
"Under the invited-error doctrine, a party may not make or invite error at trial and then take advantage of the error on appeal." Czubak v. State, 570 So.2d 925, 928 (Fla. 1990). In the instant case, if any error was committed in honoring the defendant's demand for speedy trial, the defendant clearly invited the error. Therefore, the defendant can not take advantage on appeal of the situation he created at trial. White v. State, 446 So.2d 1031, 1036 (Fla.1984); McCrae v. State, 395 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1041, 102 S.Ct. 583, 70 L.Ed.2d 486 (1981).
Affirmed.