Case Name: In Re: Isiah JAMES, Jr., Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-05-04
Citations: 376 F. App'x 294
Docket Number: No. 10-1327
Parties: In Re: Isiah JAMES, Jr., Petitioner.
Judges: Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 376
Pages: 294–295

Head Matter:
In Re: Isiah JAMES, Jr., Petitioner.
No. 10-1327.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 29, 2010.
Decided: May 4, 2010.
Isiah James, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se.
Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Isiah James, Jr. petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find there has been no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in for-ma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument be cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.