Case Name: The STATE, Respondent v. Wendell D. GOFF, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jurisdiction: South Carolina
Decision Date: 1991-09-09
Citations: 305 S.C. 374
Docket Number: 23466
Parties: The STATE, Respondent v. Wendell D. GOFF, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Carolina Reports
Volume: 305
Pages: 374–374

Head Matter:
23466
The STATE, Respondent v. Wendell D. GOFF, Appellant.
(409 S.E. (2d) 361)
Supreme Court
David E. Taylor, Columbia, for appellant.
Assistant Chief Counsel Joseph H. Lumpkin, Jr., of S.C. Dept. ofHwys. &Pub. Trans., Columbia, for respondent.
Submitted June 10, 1991.
Decided Sept. 9, 1991.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
Appellant's magistrate's court conviction was reversed by the circuit court. The circuit court's original order did not remand the case for a new trial. The parties are confused whether appellant can be retried. We hold that he may be regardless of the omission of the word "remand." See Hamm v. Southern Bell, — S.C. —, 406 S.E. (2d) 157 (1991); State v. Wyse, 33 S.C. 582, 12 S.E. 556 (1891).'In light of our holding, we need not reach the remaining issue raised by appellant.
Affirmed.