Case Name: FLASH WELDING COMPANY, a Florida corporation, and Lester Hassell, Petitioners, v. James R. FLOYD, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1961-10-18
Citations: 133 So. 2d 643
Docket Number: No. 31089
Parties: FLASH WELDING COMPANY, a Florida corporation, and Lester Hassell, Petitioners, v. James R. FLOYD, Respondent.
Judges: ROBERTS, C. J., and HOBSON, DREW, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 133
Pages: 643–643

Head Matter:
FLASH WELDING COMPANY, a Florida corporation, and Lester Hassell, Petitioners, v. James R. FLOYD, Respondent.
No. 31089.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Oct. 18, 1961.
Welsh, Cornell, Pyszka & Carlton and Errol S. Cornell, Miami, for petitioners.
Sam H. Nedelman and Dan G. Wheeler, Miami, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Certiorari in this case is sought to review the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, in James R. Floyd v. Flash Welding Company, a Florida corporation, et al., Fla.App.1961, 127 So.2d 129. The decision of the District Court is bottomed upon the case of Cromer v. Thomas, Fla.App.1960, 124 So.2d 36, in which case we denied certiorari September 29, 1961. The identical question being involved here, it is, thereupon
Ordered that the application for the writ must be and the same is hereby
Denied.
ROBERTS, C. J., and HOBSON, DREW, THORNAL and O'CONNELL, JJ., concur.