Case Name: Edgar A. HILL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-07-25
Citations: 285 F. App'x 74
Docket Number: No. 07-1572
Parties: Edgar A. HILL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before TRAXLER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit. Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 285
Pages: 74–74

Head Matter:
Edgar A. HILL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 07-1572.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 30, 2008.
Decided: July 25, 2008.
Joseph E. Wolfe, Norton, Virginia, for Appellant. Michael McGaughran, Regional l hief Counsel, William B. Reeser, Supervisory Attorney, Craig B. Ormson, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; John L. Brownlee, United States Attorney, Sara Bugbee Winn, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before TRAXLER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit. Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Edgar A. Hill appeals the district court's order affirming the Commissioner's decision to deny disability benefits. We must uphold the decision to deny benefits if the decision is supported by substantial evidence and the correct law was applied. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2000); Craig v. Chater, 76 F.3d 585, 589 (4th Cir.1996). We have thoroughly reviewed the parties' briefs, administrative record, and the materials submitted in the joint appendix, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, jve affirm. Hill v. Astrue, No. 2:06-cv-00032-GMW (W.D.Va. Apr. 19, 2007). We'dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.