Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Walther GUERRERO-LOPEZ, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-10-14
Citations: 397 F. App'x 253
Docket Number: No. 10-1434
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Walther GUERRERO-LOPEZ, Appellant.
Judges: Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 397
Pages: 253–253

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Walther GUERRERO-LOPEZ, Appellant.
No. 10-1434.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 13, 2010.
Filed: Oct. 14, 2010.
Clay Fowlkes, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Arkansas, for Appel-lee.
Bruce Eddy, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Fayetteville, AR, for Appellant.
Walther Guerrero-Lopez, U.S. Penitentiary Atlanta, GA, pro se.
Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Walther Guerrero-Lopez appeals the 46-month prison sentence the district court imposed upon his guilty plea to illegal reentry after deportation for an aggravated felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). His counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), questioning whether the sentence was procedurally sound and substantively reasonable.
We conclude that the district court committed no procedural error and imposed a substantively reasonable sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007) (in reviewing sentence, appellate court first ensures that district court committed no significant procedural error, and then considers substantive reasonableness of sentence under abuse-of-discretion standard; if sentence is within applicable Guidelines range, appellate court may apply presumption of reasonableness); United States v. Haack, 403 F.3d 997, 1004 (8th Cir.2005) (describing abuse of discretion).
Having reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivo-lous issues. Accordingly, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw, and we affirm.
. The Honorable Jimm Lariy Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas.