Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Darrill Dupree, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2007-02-06
Citations: 37 A.D.3d 491
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Darrill Dupree, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 37
Pages: 491–492

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Darrill Dupree, Appellant.
[829 NYS2d 199]—

Opinion:
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Guzman, J), rendered October 4, 2004, convicting him of attempted burglary in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Starkey, J.), of that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention on appeal, the show-up identification, which was conducted in close geographic and temporal proximity to the crime, was reasonable under the circumstances and not unduly suggestive (see People v Chipp, 75 NY2d 327 [1990]; People v Rosa, 231 AD2d 534 [1996]; People v Mitchell, 185 AD2d 249 [1992]; cf. People v Ortiz, 90 NY2d 533 [1997]). Thus, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony. Miller, J.E, Spolzino, Ritter and Dillon, JJ., concur.