Case Name: Juan Sylvester BARNES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WASHINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE; Tammy Jurado, Detective, Hagerstown Department of Police, Defendants-Appellees, and Medical Department Washington County Jail; John Vanhoy, Sergeant, Maryland State Police/Criminal Investigation Division, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-07-23
Citations: 534 F. App'x 227
Docket Number: No. 13-6492
Parties: Juan Sylvester BARNES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WASHINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE; Tammy Jurado, Detective, Hagerstown Department of Police, Defendants-Appellees, and Medical Department Washington County Jail; John Vanhoy, Sergeant, Maryland State Police/Criminal Investigation Division, Defendants.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 534
Pages: 227–227

Head Matter:
Juan Sylvester BARNES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WASHINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE; Tammy Jurado, Detective, Hagerstown Department of Police, Defendants-Appellees, and Medical Department Washington County Jail; John Vanhoy, Sergeant, Maryland State Police/Criminal Investigation Division, Defendants.
No. 13-6492.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 18, 2013.
Decided: July 23, 2013.
Juan Sylvester Barnes, Appellant pro se. Kirk Chalis Downey, Office of the County Attorney, Hagerstown, Maryland; Rodger Owen Robertson, Law Office of Joseph M. Jagielski, Baltimore, Maryland; John Francis Breads, Jr., Hanover, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Juan Sylvester Barnes seeks to appeal the district court order dismissing some defendants to his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action after concluding that Barnes failed to state a claim against these defendants. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Barnes seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.