Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. George ALDRIDGE, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-12-16
Citations: 128 S.W.3d 528
Docket Number: No. 82541
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. George ALDRIDGE, Appellant.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL JR., J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 128
Pages: 528–529

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. George ALDRIDGE, Appellant.
No. 82541.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Dec. 16, 2003.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Feb. 26, 2004.
Nancy A. McKerrow, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Stephanie Morrell, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL JR., J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J

Opinion:
ORDER
George Mdridge ("Mdridge") appeals the judgment on his conviction by a jury of three counts of statutory sodomy in the first degree. Mdridge contends that the trial court erred in the admission of certain testimony, as it was cumulative and invaded the province of the jury. He also claims that the trial court erred in failing to declare a mistrial, sua sponte, based upon alleged prosecutorial misconduct. Finally, Aldridge asserts that his sentences were excessive.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).