Case Name: W. A. GARRETT et al. v. EMMA R. HUNT et al.
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1926-04-20
Citations: 117 Or. 673
Docket Number: 
Parties: W. A. GARRETT et al. v. EMMA R. HUNT et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 117
Pages: 673–677

Head Matter:
Motion to dismiss appeal denied March 2, submitted on briefs on the merits March 30,
modified April 20, 1926.
W. A. GARRETT et al. v. EMMA R. HUNT et al.
(244 Pac. 82; 245 Pac. 321.)
For the motion, Mr. Ernest Cole.
Contra, Messrs. Emmons, Lush S Bynon.

Opinion:
McBRIDE, C. J.
Section 548, Or. L., provides generally for the review on appeal of judgments and decrees, and, so far as it applies to this matter, is as follows:
"No appeal to the supreme court shall be taken or allowed in any action for the recovery of money or damages only unless it appears from the pleadings in the case that the amount in controversy exceeds $250."
Counsel for respondents has cited many decisions from other states under statutes similar to our own, but not one of them seem to be in point in this case. In this state, the distinction between a suit in equity and an action at law is well preserved, and it will be seen that that part of the section quoted applies only to actions. The fact that the principal matter concerning which the suit was instituted was finally admitted by the defendants did not transmute the suit into an action, and, whatever the rule may be under the peculiar statutes of other states, we are bound by the terms of the statute.
The motion to dismiss will be overruled.
Motion Overruled.
For the appellants there was a brief over the name of Messrs. Emmons, Lush & By non.
For the respondents there was a brief over the name of Mr. Ernest Cole.
Modified April 20, 1926.