Case Name: Franklin C. SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U.S. District Court Judge Mark S. DAVIS, District Judge; William B. Traxler, Jr., Chief Circuit Judge; J. Harvie Wilkinson, III, Circuit Judge; Paul V. Niemeyer, Circuit Judge; Barbara Milano Keenan, Circuit Judge; Diana Gribbon Motz, Circuit Judge; Samuel W. Phillips, Judicial Council Member, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-06-11
Citations: 528 F. App'x 288
Docket Number: No. 13-6413
Parties: Franklin C. SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U.S. District Court Judge Mark S. DAVIS, District Judge; William B. Traxler, Jr., Chief Circuit Judge; J. Harvie Wilkinson, III, Circuit Judge; Paul V. Niemeyer, Circuit Judge; Barbara Milano Keenan, Circuit Judge; Diana Gribbon Motz, Circuit Judge; Samuel W. Phillips, Judicial Council Member, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 528
Pages: 288–289

Head Matter:
Franklin C. SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U.S. District Court Judge Mark S. DAVIS, District Judge; William B. Traxler, Jr., Chief Circuit Judge; J. Harvie Wilkinson, III, Circuit Judge; Paul V. Niemeyer, Circuit Judge; Barbara Milano Keenan, Circuit Judge; Diana Gribbon Motz, Circuit Judge; Samuel W. Phillips, Judicial Council Member, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 13-6413.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 6, 2013.
Decided: June 11, 2013.
Franklin C. Smith, Appellant Pro Se.
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Franklin C. Smith appeals the district court's order dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006) his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 408 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Davis, No. 2:13-cv-00043-RAJ-TEM (E.D.Va. Feb. 8, 2013). We deny Smith's motion to transfer venue. See Bolin v. Story, 225 F.3d 1234, 1238-39 (11th Cir.2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.