Case Name: John Mancuso et al., Plaintiffs, v. Theodore J. Bellerive et al., Defendants; Miscoe Spring Beverage Co., Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent; American Motorists Insurance Company, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1975-12-01
Citations: 50 A.D.2d 802
Docket Number: 
Parties: John Mancuso et al., Plaintiffs, v Theodore J. Bellerive et al., Defendants; Miscoe Spring Beverage Co., Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent; American Motorists Insurance Company, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 50
Pages: 802–803

Head Matter:
John Mancuso et al., Plaintiffs, v Theodore J. Bellerive et al., Defendants; Miscoe Spring Beverage Co., Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent; American Motorists Insurance Company, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

Opinion:
— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the third-party defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 6, 1975, which denied its motion for a severance of the third-party action. Order reversed, with $50 costs and disbursements, and motion granted. Under the facts in this case, a trial of all causes of action before the same jury would subject the third-party defendant to some prejudice (Kelly v Yannotti, 4 NY2d 603; Be Luca v Schlesinger, 39 AD2d 566). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur; Shapiro, J., dissents and votes to affirm the order appealed from, with the following memorandum: The two cases relied upon in the memorandum of the majority herein (Kelly v Yannotti, 4 NY2d 603; De Luca v Schlesinger, 39 AD2d 566) are not in point. In the instant case, issue was joined in August, 1972 and the third-party complaint was served in December, 1972. A note of issue was filed in March, 1974. Appellant waited until the eve of trial before proceeding, by notice of motion dated January 30, 1975, to move for a severance. Under the circumstances, I do not believe that Trial Term abused its discretion in denying the motion.