Case Name: Victorino CRUZ-MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-06-09
Citations: 183 F. App'x 682
Docket Number: No. 06-70329
Parties: Victorino CRUZ-MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: CANBY, T.G. NELSON and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 183
Pages: 682–683

Head Matter:
Victorino CRUZ-MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 06-70329.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 5, 2006.
Filed June 9, 2006.
Victorino Cruz-Martinez, Eloy Detention Center, Eloy, AZ, for Petitioner.
Cynthia M. Parsons, USPX — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, OIL, Edward C. Durant, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: CANBY, T.G. NELSON and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Upon review of the record, we conclude that the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. Accordingly, respondent's motion for summary disposition is granted. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard for summary disposition).
All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.