Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Saul ACUNA-ACOSTA, a.k.a. El Guero, a.k.a. El Primo, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-10-06
Citations: 398 F. App'x 589
Docket Number: No. 10-10868
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Saul ACUNA-ACOSTA, a.k.a. El Guero, a.k.a. El Primo, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before HULL, PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 398
Pages: 589–589

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Saul ACUNA-ACOSTA, a.k.a. El Guero, a.k.a. El Primo, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-10868
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Oct. 6, 2010.
Anne R. Schultz, Wifredo A. Ferrer, U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, Kathleen M. Salyer, William T. Zloch, United States Attorney’s Office, West Palm Beach, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Richard L. Rosenbaum, Arnstein & Lehr, LLP, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, Saul Acuna-Acosta, Miami, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before HULL, PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Richard L. Rosenbaum, appointed counsel for Saul Acuna-Acosta in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Acuna-Acosta's conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.