Case Name: SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES
Court: United States Court of Claims
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1926-04-05
Citations: 62 Ct. Cl. 57
Docket Number: No. D-354
Parties: SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES
Judges: GRai-iam, Judge; Hat, Judge; Downet, Judge; and Booth, Judge, concur.
Reporter: United States Court of Claims Reports
Volume: 62
Pages: 57–61

Head Matter:
SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES
[No. D-354.
Decided April 5, 1926]
Mr. William, R. Harr for the plaintiff. Mr. Charles H. Bates was on the brief.
Mr. Louis R. MehZinger, with whom was Mr. Assistant Attorney General Herman J. Galloway, for the defendant. Mr. Perry W. How'wd was on the brief.

Opinion:
Campbell, Chief Justice,
delivered the opinion of the court :
The greater part of the claim involved in this suit is for the transportation of members of the National Guard, the question being whether or not they were troops of the United States. This question has been decided in favor of the plaintiff's contention. See Oregon-Washington Railroad and Navigation Company case, 60 C. Cls. 458. A smaller item claimed arises because of a deduction of 3 per cent from the plaintiff's bills made by the disbursing officer or auditor, acting upon the Joint Military Arrangement No. 1 effective on and after January 1, 1921, by which the plaintiff and its connections agreed to accept a deduction of 3 per cent on transportation exclusively of commissioned officers and others of the United States Army, Navy, and Marine Corps. This provision does not extend to the National Guard, and therefore the deduction of 8 per cent was erroneous. Plaintiff is entitled to recover on account of this item. And it is so ordered.
GRai-iam, Judge; Hat, Judge; Downet, Judge; and Booth, Judge, concur.