Case Name: Angelito TRINIDAD; et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. John S. PANGELINAN and Merced B. Pangelinan, Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-02-11
Citations: 120 F. App'x 742
Docket Number: No. 04-15287
Parties: Angelito TRINIDAD; et al., Plaintiffs—Appellees, v. John S. PANGELINAN and Merced B. Pangelinan, Defendants—Appellants.
Judges: Before: FERNANDEZ, GRABER, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 120
Pages: 742–743

Head Matter:
Angelito TRINIDAD; et al., Plaintiffs—Appellees, v. John S. PANGELINAN and Merced B. Pangelinan, Defendants—Appellants.
No. 04-15287.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 7, 2005.
Decided Feb. 11, 2005.
Robert T. Torres, Saipan, MP, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.
John S. Pangelinan, Saipan, MP, pro se.
Before: FERNANDEZ, GRABER, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
The Clerk shall amend the docket to reflect that Merced B. Pangelinan is a Defendant-Appellant.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Husband and wife defendants John S. and Merced B. Pangelinan appeal pro se the district court's order denying their motion to compel an accounting, and granting plaintiffs' motion for sanctions. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 1291. We affirm.
The Pangelinans' sole contention on appeal is that the underlying judgment in this case is void. We reject this contention because the judgment has twice been affirmed by this court. See Trinidad v. Pangelinan, No. 02-16013 (9th Cir. Jan. 15, 2003); Trinidad v. Pangelinan, Nos. 00-15697, 00-15705, 00-16630, 01-16622 (9th Cir. Mar.15, 2002).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.