Case Name: STATE, Respondent, v. MORSE, et al, Appellants
Court: South Dakota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: South Dakota
Decision Date: 1929-02-21
Citations: 54 S.D. 481
Docket Number: File No. 6657
Parties: STATE, Respondent, v. MORSE, et al, Appellants.
Judges: M'ISER, C., sitting in lieu of BROWN, J., absent.
Reporter: South Dakota Reports
Volume: 54
Pages: 481–482

Head Matter:
STATE, Respondent, v. MORSE, et al, Appellants.
(223 N. W. 600.)
(File No. 6657.
Opinion filed February 21, 1929.)
Kelley & Luby, of Huron, for Appellants.
Buell F. Jones, Attorney General Donald B. Montgomery, Assistant Attorney General, and William A. Marble, State’s Attorney, of Emery, for the State.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Defendants were informed against and convicted of the crime of robbery, the defense being in the nature of an alibi. From the judgment and an order denying their motion for a new trial, they have appealed.
The sole question presented by the appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence, which was conflicting. The testimony introduced by the state, if believed by the jury, furnishes ample support for the verdict.
The judgment and order appeal from are therefore affirmed.
M'ISER, C., sitting in lieu of BROWN, J., absent.