Case Name: James TEMPLE, as Attorney-in-Fact FOR Elma Betty TEMPLE, Petitioner v. PROVIDENCE CARE CENTER, LLC d/b/a Providence Care Center, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2019-03-26
Citations: 205 A.3d 312
Docket Number: No. 309 WAL 2018
Parties: James TEMPLE, as Attorney-in-Fact FOR Elma Betty TEMPLE, Petitioner
v.
PROVIDENCE CARE CENTER, LLC d/b/a Providence Care Center, Respondent
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 205
Pages: 312–312

Head Matter:
James TEMPLE, as Attorney-in-Fact FOR Elma Betty TEMPLE, Petitioner
v.
PROVIDENCE CARE CENTER, LLC d/b/a Providence Care Center, Respondent
No. 309 WAL 2018
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
March 26, 2019
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 26th day of March, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:
(1) Did the Superior Court disregard decades of controlling Supreme Court precedent by affirming the grant of a new trial based upon errors that were not preserved properly at the time of trial?