Case Name: Frank Rideg, Respondent, v. Philip Kaufman, Ignatz Lustig and Joseph Lustig, Doing Business under the Trade Name and Style of Riverview Realty Company, and Ignatz Lustig and Joseph Lustig, as Sureties, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1927-04
Citations: 220 A.D. 733
Docket Number: 
Parties: Frank Rideg, Respondent, v. Philip Kaufman, Ignatz Lustig and Joseph Lustig, Doing Business under the Trade Name and Style of Riverview Realty Company, and Ignatz Lustig and Joseph Lustig, as Sureties, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 220
Pages: 733–733

Head Matter:
Frank Rideg, Respondent, v. Philip Kaufman, Ignatz Lustig and Joseph Lustig, Doing Business under the Trade Name and Style of Riverview Realty Company, and Ignatz Lustig and Joseph Lustig, as Sureties, Appellants.

Opinion:
Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Finding of fact XIII is modified so as to read as follows: " XIII. That at the time the plaintiff was prevented from continuing the performance of his said agreement the reasonable value of the total amount of work done by him under his contract aforesaid is and was the sum of $1,588.50." No opinion. Present — Kelly, P. J., Young, Kapper, Lazansky and Hagarty, JJ.