Case Name: George GELMAN v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION; George SHULOF, suing on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated, Appellant in No. 78-1447, v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION; Paul E. SLATER, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated, Appellant in No. 78-1446, v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION. Appeal of George GELMAN and Fannie Mann in No. 78-1445
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1980-01-28
Citations: 612 F.2d 799
Docket Number: Nos. 78-1445 to 78-1447
Parties: George GELMAN v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION. George SHULOF, suing on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated, Appellant in No. 78-1447, v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION. Paul E. SLATER, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated, Appellant in No. 78-1446, v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION. Appeal of George GELMAN and Fannie Mann in No. 78-1445.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 612
Pages: 799–799

Head Matter:
George GELMAN v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION. George SHULOF, suing on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated, Appellant in No. 78-1447, v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION. Paul E. SLATER, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated, Appellant in No. 78-1446, v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION. Appeal of George GELMAN and Fannie Mann in No. 78-1445.
Nos. 78-1445 to 78-1447.
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Argued Nov. 14, 1978.
Reargued en bane Nov. 8, 1979.
Decided Jan. 28, 1980.
Harold R. Schmidt, Rose, Schmidt, Dixon, Hasley, Whyte, Hardesty, Pittsburgh, Pa. and Howard A. Specter, Litman, Litman, Harris & Specter, P. A., Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellants.
Peter J. Nickles, Covington & Burling, Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Before SEITZ, Chief Judge, and ALDI-SERT, ADAMS, GIBBONS, HUNTER, GARTH, HIGGINBOTHAM and SLOVITER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
PER CURIAM.
The Court is evenly divided on this appeal.
The judgment of the district court will be affirmed:
Each party shall bear its own cost.