Case Name: Edward C. LECKEY, Respondent v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Petitioner
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2008-12-30
Citations: 599 Pa. 459
Docket Number: Appeal No. 329 WAL 2008
Parties: Edward C. LECKEY, Respondent v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Petitioner.
Judges: 
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 599
Pages: 459–459

Head Matter:
961 A.2d 856
Edward C. LECKEY, Respondent v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Dec. 30, 2008.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 30th day of December, 2008, PennDOT's Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED; the order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED for reinstatement of the order granting nonsuit in favor of PennDOT. See Womer v. Hilliker, 589 Pa. 256, 908 A.2d 269, 278 (2006) (Pa.R.C.P. 126 is available to party a who makes substantial attempt to conform to rule of civil procedure, not to a party who disregards rule's terms entirely and determines for himself what steps he can take to satisfy rule's requirements).