Case Name: Elli GUTFRUCHT, Appellant, v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION; Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, as successor in interest to Homeward Residential, Inc. f/k/a American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.; Ralf Gutfrucht; Sherwood At the Crossroads Homeowners Association, Inc; and Department of Revenue, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2017-11-03
Citations: 235 So. 3d 967
Docket Number: Case No. 2D16-711
Parties: Elli GUTFRUCHT, Appellant, v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION; Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, as successor in interest to Homeward Residential, Inc. f/k/a American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.; Ralf Gutfrucht; Sherwood At the Crossroads Homeowners Association, Inc; and Department of Revenue, Appellees.
Judges: SILBERMAN, SALARIO, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 235
Pages: 967–968

Head Matter:
Elli GUTFRUCHT, Appellant, v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION; Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, as successor in interest to Homeward Residential, Inc. f/k/a American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.; Ralf Gutfrucht; Sherwood At the Crossroads Homeowners Association, Inc; and Department of Revenue, Appellees.
Case No. 2D16-711
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Opinion filed November 3, 2017
Rehearing Denied January 3, 2018
Thomas Erskine Ice and Amanda L. Lundergran of Ice Appellate, Royal Palm Beach (withdrew after briefing), for Appellant.
Elli Gutfrucht, pro se.
David Rosenberg and Robert R. Edwards of Robertson, Anschutz & Schneid, PL, Boca Raton, for Appellee Federal National Mortgage Association.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Elli Gutfrucht appeals a final judgment of foreclosure in favor of Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae). We affirm without comment in all respects save one. Fannie Mae has correctly conceded that the amount due stated in the final judgment was mistakenly based on a principal amount of $384,309.89. Fannie Mae's evidence was sufficient to show that the actual principal amount was $308,790. Accordingly, we reverse the final judgment's computation of the amount due and remand for the trial court to recalculate that sum based on the correct principal amount and enter a judgment reflecting that amount. See, e.g., Messiha v. First Fla. Credit Union, 139 So.3d 376, 377 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (reversing and remanding for the recalculation of the interest awarded in a final judgment of foreclosure where amount awarded was based on a miscalculation).
Affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded with directions.
SILBERMAN, SALARIO, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.