Case Name: Juanard ROBINSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M. CRY, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-11-27
Citations: 256 F. App'x 952
Docket Number: No. 05-16377
Parties: Juanard ROBINSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. M. CRY, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before: TRÓTT, W. FLETCHER and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 256
Pages: 952–952

Head Matter:
Juanard ROBINSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. M. CRY, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 05-16377.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 13, 2007.
Filed Nov. 27, 2007.
Juanard Robinson, Vacaville, CA, pro se.
Before: TRÓTT, W. FLETCHER and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
California state prisoner Juanard Robinson appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing for failure to state a claim his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging defendant Cry violated his due process rights by denying his grievance. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for failure to state a claim, Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.2000), and we affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Robinson's action because his claim that he was not allowed to file a citizen's complaint on behalf of another inmate failed to' identify a liberty interest giving rise to due process protections. See Ramirez v. Galaza, 334 F.3d 850, 860 (9th Cir.2003) ("[Ijnmates lack a separate constitutional entitlement to a specific prison grievance procedure.")
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.