Case Name: Emerson M.F. JOU, M.D., Individually, and on behalf of the class or others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gary W.B. CHANG, In his capacity as a Judge of the First Circuit Court, State of Hawaii; Does 1-100, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-12-07
Citations: 210 F. App'x 578
Docket Number: No. 05-15207
Parties: Emerson M.F. JOU, M.D., Individually, and on behalf of the class or others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gary W.B. CHANG, In his capacity as a Judge of the First Circuit Court, State of Hawaii; Does 1-100, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: TROTT, WARDLAW, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 210
Pages: 578–578

Head Matter:
Emerson M.F. JOU, M.D., Individually, and on behalf of the class or others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gary W.B. CHANG, In his capacity as a Judge of the First Circuit Court, State of Hawaii; Does 1-100, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 05-15207.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 15, 2006.
Filed Dec. 7, 2006.
Stephen M. Shaw, Esq., Honolulu, HI, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Mark J. Bennett, Esq., AGHI-Office of the Hawaii Attorney General, Honolulu, HI, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before: TROTT, WARDLAW, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
ORDER
For the reasons stated in the thorough and well-reasoned order of the district court, the district court's Order Denying Plaintiffs Ex Parte Motion For Temporary Restraining Order, Order Denying Plaintiffs Ex Parte Motion For Preliminary Injunction, and Order Dismissing Plaintiffs Complaint Without Prejudice are AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.