Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Paul Dall ISOM and Albert Arnold Orndoff, Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1970-11-09
Citations: 432 F.2d 1012
Docket Number: Nos. 25581, 25582
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Paul Dall ISOM and Albert Arnold Orndoff, Appellants.
Judges: Before CHAMBERS, DUNIWAY and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 432
Pages: 1012–1012

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Paul Dall ISOM and Albert Arnold Orndoff, Appellants.
Nos. 25581, 25582.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Nov. 9, 1970.
Donald H. Hazel, Sanger, Cal. (argued) on § 25581, Eugene W. Krum, Sanger, Cal. (argued) on § 25582, for appellant.
Richard V. Boulger, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Dwayne Keyes, U. S. Atty., Fresno, Cal., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS, DUNIWAY and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of conviction is reversed for the reason that there was not enough evidence of dominion and control by the defendants to sustain the conviction.
Cf. Williams v. United States, 9 Cir., 418 F.2d 159.