Case Name: OFFICE OF the PUBLIC DEFENDER of the NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT In and For ORANGE COUNTY, Florida, Petitioner, v. Honorable J. C. STONE, Jr., Judge of the County Court of the Ninth Judicial Circuit, Criminal Justice Division, in and for Orange County, Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1980-10-29
Citations: 390 So. 2d 1195
Docket Number: No. 80-1109
Parties: OFFICE OF the PUBLIC DEFENDER of the NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT In and For ORANGE COUNTY, Florida, Petitioner, v. Honorable J. C. STONE, Jr., Judge of the County Court of the Ninth Judicial Circuit, Criminal Justice Division, in and for Orange County, Florida, Respondent.
Judges: ORFINGER and COBB, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 390
Pages: 1195–1196

Head Matter:
OFFICE OF the PUBLIC DEFENDER of the NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT In and For ORANGE COUNTY, Florida, Petitioner, v. Honorable J. C. STONE, Jr., Judge of the County Court of the Ninth Judicial Circuit, Criminal Justice Division, in and for Orange County, Florida, Respondent.
No. 80-1109.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Oct. 29, 1980.
Rehearing Denied Dec. 16, 1980.
Harry W. Carls, III, Public Defender, and Anne E. Richards, Asst. Public Defender, Orlando, for petitioner.
No appearance for respondent.

Opinion:
COWART, Judge.
This is a petition for a writ of common law certiorari to review a circuit court order denying a writ of certiorari to review a non-final order of a county court relating to discovery in a criminal case.
We deny the petition because it demonstrates neither the jurisdiction of this court nor any basis for a decision that the circuit court exceeded its jurisdiction or departed from the essential requirements of law.
PETITION DENIED.
ORFINGER and COBB, JJ., concur.
. The petition is not accompanied by an appendix, as required by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.100(e), containing the order of the circuit court from which it can be determined that the petitioner is the real party in interest, that the circuit court order is final [Fla.R. App.P. 9.030(b)(2)(B)], and that the petition is timely [Fla.R.App.P. 9.100(c)],
. The petition purports to seek review of a circuit court order, yet the relief sought is the quashing of the county court order, the county court judge is named as respondent and served and all argument is directed toward the action of the county court.