Case Name: SCOVEL, Respondent, v. PENNINGTON COUNTY, et al, Appellants
Court: South Dakota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: South Dakota
Decision Date: 1938-03-07
Citations: 66 S.D. 75
Docket Number: File No. 8148
Parties: SCOVEL, Respondent, v. PENNINGTON COUNTY, et al, Appellants
Judges: All the Judges concur.
Reporter: South Dakota Reports
Volume: 66
Pages: 75–76

Head Matter:
SCOVEL, Respondent, v. PENNINGTON COUNTY, et al, Appellants
(278 N. W. 176)
(File No. 8148.
Opinion filed March 7, 1938.)
Whiting & Wilson, of Rapid City, for Appellants.
Walter Miser and Philip & Leedom, all of Rapid City, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER 'CURIAM.
The above-entitled matter is before us upon the motion of respondent to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that controversy has ceased to exist and that all questions involved have become moot.
We are convinced, however, that the judgment of the learned trial court, if left unreversed, will preclude the appellant county as to a matter vital to its rights. Under the settled law of this jurisdiction such a cause has not become moot and should not be disposed of summarily upon motion for dismissal. Clarke et al. v. Beadle County, 40 S. D. 597, 169 N. W. 23; State ex rel. Coolsaet et al. v. City of Veblen et al., 56 S. D. 394, 228 N. W. 802; City of Brookings v. Martinson, 60 S. D. 127, 243 N. W. 915.
The motion is therefore denied.
All the Judges concur.