Case Name: Russell Bardin, Sr., Appellant, v. James A. Tuozzolo et al., Respondents and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents. William C. Smith, Individually and Doing Business as William Smith Construction, et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1993-02-05
Citations: 190 A.D.2d 1090
Docket Number: 
Parties: Russell Bardin, Sr., Appellant, v James A. Tuozzolo et al., Respondents and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents. William C. Smith, Individually and Doing Business as William Smith Construction, et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 190
Pages: 1090–1090

Head Matter:
Russell Bardin, Sr., Appellant, v James A. Tuozzolo et al., Respondents and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents. William C. Smith, Individually and Doing Business as William Smith Construction, et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents.

Opinion:
— Order unanimously affirmed with costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Hayes, J. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Oswego County, Hayes, J.— Summary Judgment.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Pine, Lawton, Boomer and Davis, JJ.