Case Name: Emanuel ANDERSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-03-30
Citations: 130 S.W.3d 726
Docket Number: No. ED 83137
Parties: Emanuel ANDERSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before BOOKER T. SHAW, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 130
Pages: 726–727

Head Matter:
Emanuel ANDERSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 83137.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
March 30, 2004.
Kristina Starke, Office of the Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Andrea Kaye Spillars, Office of the Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before BOOKER T. SHAW, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Emanuel Anderson appeals the judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. He contends he pleaded guilty involuntarily because his plea counsel mistakenly led him to believe the trial court would grant him probation.
Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).