Case Name: Mallonee et al. v. Fahey et al.; Wilmington Federal Savings & Loan Association et al. v. Home Loan Bank Board et al.; Home Investment Co. v. Fahey et al.; Utley v. Fahey et al.; Wallis et al. v. Fahey et al.; Title Service Co., Trustee, v. Fahey et al.; and Willhoit v. Fahey et al.
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1953-05-04
Citations: 345 U.S. 952
Docket Number: No. 591; No. 592; No. 593; No. 594; No. 595; No. 596; No. 658
Parties: Mallonee et al. v. Fahey et al.; Wilmington Federal Savings & Loan Association et al. v. Home Loan Bank Board et al.; Home Investment Co. v. Fahey et al.; Utley v. Fahey et al.; Wallis et al. v. Fahey et al.; Title Service Co., Trustee, v. Fahey et al.; and Willhoit v. Fahey et al.
Judges: Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 345
Pages: 952–952

Head Matter:
No. 591.
No. 592.
No. 593.
No. 594.
No. 595.
No. 596.
No. 658.
Mallonee et al. v. Fahey et al.; Wilmington Federal Savings & Loan Association et al. v. Home Loan Bank Board et al.; Home Investment Co. v. Fahey et al.; Utley v. Fahey et al.; Wallis et al. v. Fahey et al.; Title Service Co., Trustee, v. Fahey et al.; and Willhoit v. Fahey et al.
Wyckoff Westover for Mallonee et al., and Charles K. Chapman for the Long Beach Federal Savings & Loan Association, petitioners in No. 591; W. I. Gilbert, Jr. for the Wilmington Federal Savings & Loan Association et al., petitioners in No. 592, and for petitioner in No. 594; F. Henry NeCasek for petitioner in No. 593; Raymond Tremaine for Wallis, and Mr. NeCasek for Turner, petitioners in No. 595; Frederic A. Shaffer and Lyman B. Sutter for petitioner in No. 596; and Emmett E. Doherty for petitioner in No. 658. Acting Solicitor General Stern, Assistant Attorney General Burger, Samuel D. Slade and Herman Marcuse for Fahey et al.; and Sylvester Hoff-mann for the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco, respondents.

Opinion:
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.