Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jaime RAMIREZ-ORTIZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-03-15
Citations: 680 F. App'x 353
Docket Number: No. 16-41250 Summary Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jaime RAMIREZ-ORTIZ, Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 680
Pages: 353–354

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jaime RAMIREZ-ORTIZ, Defendant-Appellant
No. 16-41250 Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed March 15, 2017
Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Jaime Ramirez-Ortiz, Pro Se
Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jaime Ramirez-Ortiz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ramirez-Ortiz has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Ramirez-Ortiz's response. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.