Case Name: Jack W. FRIEND, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Ronald KOLODZIECZAK, et al., Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1995-09-19
Citations: 72 F.3d 1386
Docket Number: No. 93-16918
Parties: Jack W. FRIEND, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Ronald KOLODZIECZAK, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: Before: PREGERSON, FERGUSON, and O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 72
Pages: 1386–1395

Head Matter:
Jack W. FRIEND, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Ronald KOLODZIECZAK, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
No. 93-16918.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 22, 1995.
Decided Sept. 19, 1995.
As Amended on Denial of Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Dec. 21, 1995.
Richard L. Reynolds, Bennett, Samuelsen, Reynolds & Allard, Oakland, California, for the defendants-appellants.
Amitai Schwartz, San Francisco, California, for the plaintiffs-appellees.
The panel unanimously found this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App.P. 34(a) and Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4.

Opinion:
AMENDED ORDER, DISSENT, AND DENIAL OF REHEARING
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.
Before: PREGERSON, FERGUSON, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.