Case Name: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. RORY SCOTT, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1990-04-09
Citations: 118 N.J. 406
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. RORY SCOTT, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 118
Pages: 406–407

Head Matter:
571 A.2d 1304
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. RORY SCOTT, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Argued January 30, 1990
Decided April 9, 1990.
Steven J. Kaflowitz, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant {John H. Stamler, Union County Prosecutor, attorney).
William J. McCarthy argued the cause for respondent.
Jessica S. Oppenheim, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for amicus curiae Attorney General of New Jersey (Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General, attorney).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Ashbey's concurring and dissenting opinion, reported at 231 N.J.Super. at 269, 555 A.2d 667 (1989).