Case Name: STATE of Missouri, ex rel., MISSOURI HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, Respondent, v. Leo J. PEIRICK, Jr. and L.J.P., Inc., Appellants
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-05-12
Citations: 967 S.W.2d 716
Docket Number: No. 72512
Parties: STATE of Missouri, ex rel., MISSOURI HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, Respondent, v. Leo J. PEIRICK, Jr. and L.J.P., Inc., Appellants.
Judges: Before CRAHAN, C.J., RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, J., and ROBERT E. CRIST, Senior Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 967
Pages: 716–717

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, ex rel., MISSOURI HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, Respondent, v. Leo J. PEIRICK, Jr. and L.J.P., Inc., Appellants.
No. 72512.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
May 12, 1998.
Samuel C. Ebling, St. Louis, for appellants.
Gerald J. Bamberger, St. Charles, Daniel L. Mohs, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before CRAHAN, C.J., RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, J., and ROBERT E. CRIST, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
In this consolidated garnishment action, L.J.P., Inc. and Leo J. Peirick, Jr. (Defen dants) appeal the grant of summary judgment entered against them and in favor of the Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission (Plaintiff).
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. The summary judgment motion and response thereto support the finding and conclusion that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that Plaintiff is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
. Plaintiff's motion to dismiss the appeal is denied.