Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. CELSO LARIOS TEJEDA, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1992-02-12
Citations: 111 Or. App. 398
Docket Number: 89-CR-0032; CA A63948
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. CELSO LARIOS TEJEDA, Appellant.
Judges: Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Joseph, Chief Judge, and Deits, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 111
Pages: 398–399

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted April 1, 1991,
affirmed February 12, 1992
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. CELSO LARIOS TEJEDA, Appellant.
(89-CR-0032; CA A63948)
826 P2d 26
Beecher C. Ellison, Grants Pass, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Kengla, Sybrant, Browne & Ellison, Grants Pass.
Douglas F. Zier, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.
Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Joseph, Chief Judge, and Deits, Judge.
PER CURIAM
Joseph, C. J., vice Newman, J., deceased.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant's probation was revoked, because he had been convicted of possession of cocaine in another case. See State v. Tejeda (A63949), 111 Or App 201, 826 P2d 25 (1992). He contends that he is not guilty of that charge and that, therefore, his probation was improperly revoked. He is wrong.
Affirmed.