Case Name: Rose Sobel, Respondent, v. Sarah Philip Sobel, Individually and as Executrix and Trustee, etc., and Frederick Sobel, Appellants, Impleaded with Others, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1916-02
Citations: 172 A.D. 945
Docket Number: 
Parties: Rose Sobel, Respondent, v. Sarah Philip Sobel, Individually and as Executrix and Trustee, etc., and Frederick Sobel, Appellants, Impleaded with Others, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 172
Pages: 945–945

Head Matter:
Rose Sobel, Respondent, v. Sarah Philip Sobel, Individually and as Executrix and Trustee, etc., and Frederick Sobel, Appellants, Impleaded with Others, Appellants.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 14th day of January, 1916, denying a motion to vacate an order for the examination of defendants.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
The order appealed from should be modified by striking therefrom, after the words "the financial condition of the defendant Frederick Sobel," the following: "and of the differences between the plaintiff and the defendant Frederick Sobel prior to such assignment; " and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Present — Clarke, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Scott and Page, JJ. Order modified as directed in opinion and as modified affirmed, without costs. Order to be settled on notice.