Case Name: THE SOUTH BALTIMORE HARBOR AND IMPROVEMENT CO. OF ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY et al. vs. JOHN G. RUSSELL and FRANKLIN MEUSHAW
Court: Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jurisdiction: Maryland
Decision Date: 1898-04-01
Citations: 87 Md. 725
Docket Number: 
Parties: THE SOUTH BALTIMORE HARBOR AND IMPROVEMENT CO. OF ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY et al. vs. JOHN G. RUSSELL and FRANKLIN MEUSHAW.
Judges: 
Reporter: Maryland Reports
Volume: 87
Pages: 725–725

Head Matter:
THE SOUTH BALTIMORE HARBOR AND IMPROVEMENT CO. OF ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY et al. vs. JOHN G. RUSSELL and FRANKLIN MEUSHAW.
The Decision in Harbor Co. v. Smith, 85 Md. ¿37, Upon Substantially the Same Facts is Conclusive of This Case.
Appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County granting an ex parte injunction with leave to the defendant to move for a dissolution.
Reversed.
Opinion by Briscoe, J., filed April 1st, 1898. Recorded in Liber J. F. F.' and A. R. No. 1, folio 69, of “ Opinions Unreported.”
Isidor Rayner and John F. Williams, for the appellant. John C. Rose, for the appellee.

Opinion:
The bill- in this case sought to enforce an alleged dedication to the public of a square in the town of Brooklyn in Anne Arundel County. It was held that the facts ruled upon in South Balto. Harbor Co. v. Smith, 85 Md. 537, were substantially the same as in this case, and that that decision was consequently conclusive of the present appeal. The order appealed from was accordingly reversed, the .injunction dissolved and the bill dismissed with costs.