Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Gregory HUDSON, Defendant/Appellant; Gregory HUDSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1992-07-07
Citations: 835 S.W.2d 522
Docket Number: Nos. 57878, 59044
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Gregory HUDSON, Defendant/Appellant. Gregory HUDSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 835
Pages: 522–522

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Gregory HUDSON, Defendant/Appellant. Gregory HUDSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 57878, 59044.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
July 7, 1992.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 12, 1992.
Application to Transfer Denied Sept. 22, 1992.
Deborah B. Wafer, St. Louis, for defendant/appellant.
William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Barbara J. Wood, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff/respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
In this jury-tried case, defendant was convicted of illegal possession of cocaine. He appealed. Our court remanded for an evidentiary hearing to determine if the State used its peremptory challenges in violation of Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). State v. Hudson, 815 S.W.2d 430 (Mo.App. E.D.1991).
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgments are affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).