Case Name: Mark L. STREET, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2005-09-07
Citations: 909 So. 2d 604
Docket Number: No. 4D05-2589
Parties: Mark L. STREET, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: STEVENSON, C.J., WARNER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 909
Pages: 604–605

Head Matter:
Mark L. STREET, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D05-2589.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Sept. 7, 2005.
Mark L. Street, Arcadia, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Although it does not appear that appellant previously raised these specific Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 claims, as the trial court's order suggests, the issues raised are meritless nonetheless. See Studnicka v. State, 679 So.2d 819, 822 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (stating that habitual felony offender sentence pronounced after October 1, 1988 is not a sentence governed by sentencing guidelines); Cooper v. State, 902 So.2d 945, 947 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (any error in guidelines scoresheet harmless when defendant is sentenced as habitual offender). Furthermore, appellant agreed to a negotiated plea and sentence.
Affirmed.
STEVENSON, C.J., WARNER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.