Case Name: Midland Corporation, complainant-respondent, v. Henrietta B. Levy and Meyer Levy, defendants; David Beck, defendant-appellant
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1936-04-24
Citations: 120 N.J. Eq. 197
Docket Number: 
Parties: Midland Corporation, complainant-respondent, v. Henrietta B. Levy and Meyer Levy, defendants; David Beck, defendant-appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 120
Pages: 197–197

Head Matter:
Midland Corporation, complainant-respondent, v. Henrietta B. Levy and Meyer Levy, defendants; David Beck, defendant-appellant.
[Submitted February term, 1936.
Decided April 24th, 1936.]
Mr. Melvin L. Weisbart, for the complainant-respondent.
Messrs. Platoff & Platoff (Mr. John N. Platoff), for the defendant-appellant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree in chancery is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion there filed. We elide therefrom, however, the parenthetical expression "who does not owe the debt" found near the top of page 79 following the name of defendant Beck.
For affirmance — Ti-ie Ohiee-Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.