Case Name: STAPLES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and Farmer Alliance Mutual Insurance Company, Petitioners, v. FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, Harley Worthington, L. E. Love Roofing Company, the Yorkshire Insurance Company of New York, St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1965-10-27
Citations: 179 So. 2d 346
Docket Number: No. 34475
Parties: STAPLES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and Farmer Alliance Mutual Insurance Company, Petitioners, v. FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, Harley Worthington, L. E. Love Roofing Company, the Yorkshire Insurance Company of New York, St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Respondents.
Judges: THOMAS, Acting C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL,. JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 179
Pages: 346–346

Head Matter:
STAPLES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and Farmer Alliance Mutual Insurance Company, Petitioners, v. FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, Harley Worthington, L. E. Love Roofing Company, the Yorkshire Insurance Company of New York, St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Respondents.
No. 34475.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Oct. 27, 1965.
Billy L. Rowe, of Mann, Harrison, Mann & Rowe, St. Petersburg, for petitioners.
John A. Lloyd, Jr., of Masterson, Lloyd & Rogers, St. Petersburg, for Plarley Worthington.
John McQuigg and William M. Holland, Jr., of Shackleford, Farrior, Stallings, Glos & Evans, Tampa, for L. E. Love Roofing Co. and Yorkshire Ins. Co. of New York.
Donald V. Bulleit, of Fowler, White, Gillen, Humkey & Trenam, Tampa, for Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.
Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for Florida Industrial Commission.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date May S, 1965.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads its to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.
The petition of Harley Worthington, respondent, for attorneys' fees in this Court is denied.
It is so ordered.
THOMAS, Acting C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, O'CONNELL and CALDWELL,. JJ., concur.