Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Winston BELL, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-12-21
Citations: 14 S.W.3d 67
Docket Number: No. ED 75683
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Winston BELL, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., and ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 14
Pages: 67–67

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Winston BELL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. ED 75683.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Dec. 21, 1999.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 2, 2000.
Application for Transfer Denied April 25, 2000.
Craig A. Johnston, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Cassandra K. Dolgin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., and ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Winston Bell (Bell) appeals from the judgment upon his conviction by a jury of first-degree murder, Section 565.020, RSMo 1994, and armed criminal action, Section 571.075, for which he was sen-fenced as a persistent offender to concurrent terms of life in prison without parole and life in prison. Bell claims the trial court erred in (1) allowing hearsay statements regarding prior abuse over his objections, (2) answering a question posed by the jury during deliberations without notifying counsel, (3) overruling objections and motions for mistrial when the court called a defense witness a "lying witness," (4) allowing the State to strike an African-American venireperson, and (5) prohibiting testimony to rebut State testimony regarding prior incidents of abuse. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file and the transcript. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
. All further statutory references are to RSMo 1994 unless otherwise indicated.