Case Name: Knowles, Appellant, v. Voorhies, Warden, Appellee
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2009-03-18
Citations: 121 Ohio St. 3d 271
Docket Number: No. 2008-2261
Parties: Knowles, Appellant, v. Voorhies, Warden, Appellee.
Judges: Moyer,’ C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 121
Pages: 271–271

Head Matter:
Knowles, Appellant, v. Voorhies, Warden, Appellee.
[Cite as Knowles v. Voorhies, 121 Ohio St.3d 271, 2009-Ohio-1109.]
(No. 2008-2261 —
Submitted March 11, 2009 —
Decided March 18, 2009.)
Howard L. Knowles, pro se.
Richard Cordray, Attorney General, and Jerri L. Fosnaught, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Appellant, Howard L. Knowles, did not attach to his petition one of the bindover entries he challenges. Thus, his petition is fatally defective and subject to dismissal because he did not attach copies of all of his pertinent commitment papers. Goudlock v. Voorhies, 119 Ohio St.3d 398, 2008-Ohio-4787, 894 N.E.2d 692, ¶ 14.
Judgment affirmed.
Moyer,' C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.