Case Name: In the Matter of the Compensation of Margie M. Guill, Claimant. GUILL, Petitioner, v. PENDLETON WOOLEN MILLS, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1987-10-21
Citations: 88 Or. App. 130
Docket Number: WCB No. 85-09065; CA A42368
Parties: In the Matter of the Compensation of Margie M. Guill, Claimant. GUILL, Petitioner, v. PENDLETON WOOLEN MILLS, Respondent.
Judges: Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Warren and Rossman, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 88
Pages: 130–131

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted July 6,
affirmed October 21,
reconsideration denied December 31, 1987,
petition for review allowed January 20, 1988 (305 Or 21)
In the Matter of the Compensation of Margie M. Guill, Claimant. GUILL, Petitioner, v. PENDLETON WOOLEN MILLS, Respondent.
(WCB No. 85-09065; CA A42368)
744 P2d 581
Robert Wollheim, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Welch, Bruun & Green, ¡ Portland.
Mildred J. Carmack, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief was Schwabe, Williamson, Wyatt, Moore & Roberts, Portland.
Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Warren and Rossman, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Claimant prevailed before the referee in establishing the compensability of her injury claim. Employer appealed to the Workers' Compensation Board, which affirmed the referee on compensability but reduced the fee which the referee had awarded claimant's attorney. Claimant seeks judicial review of that action. She argues, first, that jurisdiction to modify a referee's attorney fees award is solely in the circuit court under ORS 656.386(1) and ORS 656.388(2). Because employer sought Board review of compensability, claimant is wrong. Greenslitt v. City of Lake Oswego, 88 Or App 94, 744 P2d 577 (1987). On de novo review, we find no reason to disturb the Board's decision.
Affirmed.