Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kimberly BROMAN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-10-19
Citations: 443 F. App'x 476
Docket Number: No. 10-15833
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kimberly BROMAN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before EDMONDSON, MARCUS and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 443
Pages: 476–476

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kimberly BROMAN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-15833.
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Oct. 19, 2011.
Susan H. Rothstein, Robert E. O’Neill, Kathy Peluso, David Paul Rhodes, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Robert Godfrey, Maria Guzman, Donna Lee Elm, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Orlando, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before EDMONDSON, MARCUS and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Robert Godfrey, appointed counsel for Kimberly Broman in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Broman's conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.