Case Name: Willard Lee CARROLL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-05-03
Citations: 578 So. 2d 868
Docket Number: No. 89-03250
Parties: Willard Lee CARROLL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and LEHAN and PARKER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 578
Pages: 868–869

Head Matter:
Willard Lee CARROLL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 89-03250.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
May 3, 1991.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Andrea Norgard, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Peggy A. Quince, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this case, appellant challenges several special conditions of probation. Condition 11 requires that appellant not visit bars, restaurants or any places serving alcoholic beverages without permission from his probation officer. Condition 21 requires that he not be within three blocks of known high drug areas as determined by his probation officer. We strike these conditions on the authority of Edmunds v. State, 559 So.2d 415 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990) and Huff v. State, 554 So.2d 616 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). We otherwise affirm.
CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and LEHAN and PARKER, JJ., concur.