Case Name: The State ex rel. Bevins, Appellant, v. Johnson, Warden, Appellee
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2012-09-05
Citations: 133 Ohio St. 3d 80
Docket Number: No. 2012-0586
Parties: The State ex rel. Bevins, Appellant, v. Johnson, Warden, Appellee.
Judges: O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 133
Pages: 80–80

Head Matter:
The State ex rel. Bevins, Appellant, v. Johnson, Warden, Appellee.
[Cite as State ex rel. Bevins v. Johnson, 133 Ohio St.3d 80, 2012-Ohio-3922.]
(No. 2012-0586
Submitted August 22, 2012
Decided September 5, 2012.)
Andrew Bevins Jr., pro se.
Michael DeWine, Attorney General, and Hilda Rosenberg, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, Andrew Bevins Jr., for a writ of habeas corpus. Bevins's claims are not cognizable in habeas corpus. Boles v. Knob, 130 Ohio St.3d 339, 2011-Ohio-5049, 958 N.E.2d 554, ¶ 1 (speedy trial); Thomas v. Huffman, 84 Ohio St.3d 266, 267, 703 N.E.2d 315 (1998) (equal protection); Bellman v. Jago, 38 Ohio St.3d 55, 55-56, 526 N.E.2d 308 (1988) (due process). Bevins had an adequate remedy by appeal to raise his claims.
Judgment affirmed.
O'Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.