Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Roger Nunez, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2014-10-08
Citations: 121 A.D.3d 766
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Roger Nunez, Respondent.
Judges: Mastro, J.E, Chambers, Austin and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 121
Pages: 766–766

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Roger Nunez, Respondent.
[992 NYS2d 905]

Opinion:
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Dutchess County (Forman, J.), dated January 3, 2013, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sexually violent offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
"A defendant seeking a downward departure has the initial burden of '(1) identifying, as a matter of law, an appropriate mitigating factor, namely, a factor which tends to establish a lower likelihood of reoffense or danger to the community and is of a kind, or to a degree, that is not otherwise adequately taken into account by the [Sex Offender Registration Act] Guidelines; and (2) establishing the facts in support of its existence by a preponderance of the evidence' " (People v Roldan, 111 AD3d 909, 910 [2013], quoting People v Wyatt, 89 AD3d 112, 128 [2011]). Upon our review of the record, we conclude that, contrary to his primary argument on appeal, the defendant failed to meet his burden in this respect (see People v Wortham, 119 AD3d 666 [2014]; People v Wood, 112 AD3d 602 [2013]).
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.
Accordingly, the County Court properly denied the defendant's application for a downward departure from his designation as a level two sexually violent offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
Mastro, J.E, Chambers, Austin and Sgroi, JJ., concur.