Case Name: JOHN DINKEL, APPELLANT, v. COUNTY OF HUDSON, RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1928-05-14
Citations: 104 N.J.L. 659
Docket Number: 
Parties: JOHN DINKEL, APPELLANT, v. COUNTY OF HUDSON, RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 104
Pages: 659–660

Head Matter:
JOHN DINKEL, APPELLANT, v. COUNTY OF HUDSON, RESPONDENT.
Argued February 9, 1928
Decided May 14, 1928.
For the appellant, Bichard McAghon.
For the respondent, Thomas F. Meehan.

Opinion:
Pee Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — -The Chancellor, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Bus-kirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.