Case Name: SABRE TRAVEL INTERNATIONAL LTD., Appellant v. DEUTSCHE LUFTHANSA AG, Austrian Airlines AG, Brussels Airlines NV/SA, and Swiss International Air Lines Ltd., Appellees
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 2017-06-01
Citations: 549 S.W.3d 600
Docket Number: NO. 02–17–00153–CV
Parties: SABRE TRAVEL INTERNATIONAL LTD., Appellant
v.
DEUTSCHE LUFTHANSA AG, Austrian Airlines AG, Brussels Airlines NV/SA, and Swiss International Air Lines Ltd., Appellees
Judges: PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; GABRIEL and KERR, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 549
Pages: 600–601

Head Matter:
SABRE TRAVEL INTERNATIONAL LTD., Appellant
v.
DEUTSCHE LUFTHANSA AG, Austrian Airlines AG, Brussels Airlines NV/SA, and Swiss International Air Lines Ltd., Appellees
NO. 02-17-00153-CV
Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth.
DELIVERED: June 1, 2017
Ralph H. Duggins, Philip A. Vickers, Cantey Hanger LLP, Fort Worth, TX, Steven J. Kaiser, Carl Lawrence Malm, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, Washington, DC, Chris Lind, Andrew C. MacNally, Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP, Chicago, Il, Karma M. Giulianelli, Jason C. Murray, Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP, Denver, CO, for Appellant.
Roland K. Johnson, Harris Finley & Bogle, P.C., Fort Worth, TX, R. Paul Yetter, Christopher D. Porter, Richard B. Farrer, Wyatt J. Dowling, Yetter Coleman LLP, Houston, TX, for Appellees.
PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; GABRIEL and KERR, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Opinion:
ELIZABETH KERR, JUSTICE
Having considered Sabre Travel International Ltd.'s petition for permissive interlocutory appeal of the trial court's May 1, 2017 "Amended Order Denying Defendant's Motion to Dismiss," we deny the petition.
See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(d) (West Supp. 2016); see also Tex. R. App. P. 28.3(a), (f), (j) ; Tex. R. Civ. P. 168.
See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(f) ; see also Blakenergy, Ltd. v. Oncor Elec. Delivery Co. , No. 02-14-00241-CV, 2014 WL 4771736, at *1 & n.2 (Tex. App.-Fort Worth Sept. 25, 2014, no pet.) (mem. op.) (stating that courts strictly construe the interlocutory appeals statute).