Case Name: Amir MENKOVIC, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2009-05-12
Citations: 282 S.W.3d 886
Docket Number: No. ED 91917
Parties: Amir MENKOVIC, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before KURT S. ODENWALD, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J. and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 282
Pages: 886–886

Head Matter:
Amir MENKOVIC, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 91917.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
May 12, 2009.
Lisa M. Stroup, Saint Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, John W. Grantham, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before KURT S. ODENWALD, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J. and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Amir Menkovic appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).