Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Juan Jose Enrique, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1992-07-07
Citations: 80 N.Y.2d 869
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Juan Jose Enrique, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 80
Pages: 869–870

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Juan Jose Enrique, Appellant.
Argued June 1,1992;
decided July 7, 1992
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Joseph V DiBlasi for appellant.
Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney (Jeanne A. Olivo and James D. Gibbons of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. We agree with the Appellate Division, for the reasons stated by Justice Sullivan (see, 165 AD2d 13), that the defendant's Sixth Amendment rights under the United States Constitution were not abridged by the court's ruling that defense counsel could not confer with his client during a luncheon recess. Nor do we perceive any basis for a different result under the State Constitution.