Case Name: ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2009-09-22
Citations: 294 S.W.3d 526
Docket Number: No. WD 69806
Parties: ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.
Judges: Before ALOK AHUJA, P.J., THOMAS H. NEWTON, C.J., and HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, SR., J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 294
Pages: 526–528

Head Matter:
ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.
No. WD 69806.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Sept. 22, 2009.
James C. Wirken, Esq., Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
Daniel N. Allmayer, Esq., Kansas City, for respondent.
Before ALOK AHUJA, P.J., THOMAS H. NEWTON, C.J., and HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, SR., J.

Opinion:
ALOK AHUJA, Judge.
Although it involves a different underlying vehicle owner/borrower, this appeal involves the same issues, and the same parties, as Arch Ins. Co. v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co., 294 S.W.3d 520 (Mo.App.2009), also decided today. Arch's opening Brief suffers from the same defects described in that decision. For the reasons stated in our opinion in No. WD69805, the appeal is dismissed. Progressive's motion to strike Arch's reply brief, or in the alternative for leave to file a sur-reply brief, is denied as moot.
NEWTON, C.J., concurs.
LOWENSTEIN, SR. J., dissents in separate opinion.