Case Name: CARROLL BRICK CO. VS. JAMES H. GABLE ET AL.
Court: Baltimore City Circuit Court
Jurisdiction: Maryland
Decision Date: 1892-06-10
Citations: 1 Balt. C. Rep. 261
Docket Number: 
Parties: CARROLL BRICK CO. VS. JAMES H. GABLE ET AL.
Judges: 
Reporter: Baltimore city reports, comprising opinions of the various courts of Baltimore city since 1888...
Volume: 1
Pages: 261–261

Head Matter:
CIRCUIT COURT OF BALTIMORE CITY
Filed June 10, 1892.
CARROLL BRICK CO. VS. JAMES H. GABLE ET AL.
E. J. Earlier and ~Wm. A. Hammond for plaintiff.
J. H. G-alile, E. N. Rich, Harry M. Benzinger, Moses Sormehill, TV. B. Trundle, E. O. SMngluff and G. S. Sauerland for defendants.

Opinion:
DENNIS, J.
In this case, I am of the opinion:
1st. That the plaintiffs are estopped from claiming a lien upon the reversion.
2d. That they are entitled to claim a lien upon the leasehold, because Stirling must be considered as agent of Gable, and they are not bound by the unrecorded declaration of trust in favor of Mrs. Gable.
I will sign a decree therefore for the sale of the leasehold interest, unless the amount of the lien claim is paid into Court by a day to be fixed by the decree.