Case Name: Quintis DYE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Chris BATTEN, Sheriff; Alexander Singletary, Deputy Sheriff; Gregg Cole; Clemintine Thompson; Ronald Hewett, Sheriff; Jane Evans, Deputy Sheriff; Kevin Holden, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-12-22
Citations: 209 F. App'x 355
Docket Number: No. 06-7735
Parties: Quintis DYE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Chris BATTEN, Sheriff; Alexander Singletary, Deputy Sheriff; Gregg Cole; Clemintine Thompson; Ronald Hewett, Sheriff; Jane Evans, Deputy Sheriff; Kevin Holden, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 209
Pages: 355–355

Head Matter:
Quintis DYE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Chris BATTEN, Sheriff; Alexander Singletary, Deputy Sheriff; Gregg Cole; Clemintine Thompson; Ronald Hewett, Sheriff; Jane Evans, Deputy Sheriff; Kevin Holden, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 06-7735.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 14, 2006.
Decided: Dec. 22, 2006.
Quintis Dye, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Quintis Dye appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dye v. Batten, No. 5:06-cv-03034-H (E.D.N.C. Oct. 4, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.