Case Name: In the Matter of Rosemary Frimpong-Badu, Petitioner, v. Gladys Carrion et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2011-06-07
Citations: 85 A.D.3d 787
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Rosemary Frimpong-Badu, Petitioner, v Gladys Carrion et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 85
Pages: 787–788

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Rosemary Frimpong-Badu, Petitioner, v Gladys Carrion et al., Respondents.
[924 NYS2d 818]

Opinion:
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Commissioner of the New York State Office of Children and Family Services dated December 18, 2009, which, after a hearing, denied the petitioner's application to amend and seal a report maintained in the New York State Central Register of Child Abuse and Maltreatment.
Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.
"At an administrative expungement hearing, a report of child abuse or maltreatment must be established by a fair preponderance of the evidence" (Matter of Blythe v Carrion, 63 AD3d 1059, 1059 [2009]; see Matter of Lee TT. v Dowling, 87 NY2d 699, 703 [1996]). "Judicial review of a determination that a report of child abuse or maltreatment has been substantiated is limited to whether the determination is supported by substantial evidence" (Matter of Blythe v Carrion, 63 AD3d at 1060; see Matter of Gonzalez v Suffolk County Dept. of Social Servs. Child Protective Servs., 54 AD3d 341 [2008]).
At the time of the subject incident, "a neglected child in residential care" (Social Services Law § 412 [2] [b]) included a child whose custodian "creates a substantial risk of physical injury . to such child by other than accidental means" (Social Services Law § 412 [former (9) (b)]). Here, the Administrative Law Judge's finding that the petitioner maltreated the subject child by creating a substantial risk of physical injury to the child by other than accidental means is supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Blythe v Carrion, 63 AD3d at 1060; see also Matter of Gonzalez v Suffolk County Dept. of Social Servs. Child Protective Servs., 54 AD3d 341 [2008]; see generally Matter of King v Perales, 153 AD2d 694 [1989]). Accordingly, the determination must be confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding dismissed on the merits. Prudenti, P.J., Angiolillo, Florio and Cohen, JJ., concur.