Case Name: Dennis J. Cooney, Respondent, v. Osgood Machinery, Inc., Respondent and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Hill Acme Company, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant; Paul Mueller Company et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1991-06-07
Citations: 174 A.D.2d 1046
Docket Number: 
Parties: Dennis J. Cooney, Respondent, v Osgood Machinery, Inc., Respondent and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Hill Acme Company, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant; Paul Mueller Company et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 174
Pages: 1046–1047

Head Matter:
Dennis J. Cooney, Respondent, v Osgood Machinery, Inc., Respondent and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Hill Acme Company, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant; Paul Mueller Company et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents.

Opinion:
—Order affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We con- elude that this case is not appropriate for summary disposition. It should be determined on a full record.
All concur, except Pine, J., who dissents in part and votes to modify, in the following Memorandum.