Case Name: AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY CO., a Connecticut corporation, Appellant, v. Jean H. STOLL, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-11-16
Citations: 663 So. 2d 8
Docket Number: No. 95-20
Parties: AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY CO., a Connecticut corporation, Appellant, v. Jean H. STOLL, Appellee.
Judges: BOOTH, MINER and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 663
Pages: 8–9

Head Matter:
AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY CO., a Connecticut corporation, Appellant, v. Jean H. STOLL, Appellee.
No. 95-20.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nov. 16, 1995.
Rehearing Denied Dec. 14, 1995.
John A. Forgas, III, of Saalfield, Catlin & Coulson, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellant.
Stephen A Hould of Jensen & Hould, Jacksonville Beach, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This cause is before us on appeal from a final judgment entered following a directed verdict on causation in a personal injury action. We must reverse and remand for a new trial because evidence on causation was conflicting and should have been presented to the jury for determination. Kowkabany v. Home Depot, Inc., 606 So.2d 716, 719-20 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) (directed verdict can be upheld only if there is no evidence or inference from the evidence which will support the non-moving party's position).
REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR NEW TRIAL.
BOOTH, MINER and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.