Case Name: The Equitable Bank, Resp't, v. Peter J. Claassen, App'lt,
Court: City Court of New York
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1893-03-25
Citations: 51 N.Y. St. Rep. 505
Docket Number: 
Parties: The Equitable Bank, Resp’t, v. Peter J. Claassen, App’lt,
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 51
Pages: 505–505

Head Matter:
The Equitable Bank, Resp’t, v. Peter J. Claassen, App’lt,
(City Court of New York, General Term,
Filed March 25, 1893.)
Appeal from judgment in favor of plaintiff.
H. M. Hitchings, for app’lt; G. F. MacLean, for resp’t.

Opinion:
McCarthy, J.
This judgment is affirmed on the opinion in action 1, except that in this action the plaintiff, in his reply to the defendant's answer, admits that at the time of the commencement of this action there was on deposit with the plaintiff a balance to the credit of the defendant, and the property of the defendant, the sum of five hundred and twenty-nine dollars and fifty cents ($529.50).
This, it seems to us, ought to be allowed to the defendant, and should be deducted from the amount of the verdict in this case. Straus v. Tradesmen's National Bank of New York, 122 N. Y., 382; 33 St. Rep., 638.
The judgment as so reduced should be affirmed, with costs.
McG-own and Van Wyck, JJ., concur.