Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee, v. Sharon DUNNIGAN, Defendant Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1991-11-15
Citations: 950 F.2d 149
Docket Number: No. 90-5668
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee, v. Sharon DUNNIGAN, Defendant Appellant.
Judges: Circuit Judge WILKINSON, Circuit Judge NIEMEYER, and Circuit Judge LUTTIG join in this dissenting opinion.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 950
Pages: 149–154

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee, v. Sharon DUNNIGAN, Defendant Appellant.
No. 90-5668.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Nov. 15, 1991.
Dissenting Opinion of Circuit Judge Wilkins Nov. 27, 1991.
Brent E. Beveridge, Morgantown, W.Va., argued for defendant-appellant.
Michael M. Fisher, Asst. U.S. Atty., argued (Michael W. Carey, U.S. Atty., Hunter P. Smith, Asst. U.S. Atty., on brief), Charleston, W.Va., for plaintiff-appellee.

Opinion:
CORRECTED ORDER
The appellee filed a petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing in banc. A member of the Court requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing in banc. The poll failed by an evenly-divided vote. Circuit Judges Widener, Wilkinson, Wilkins, Niemeyer, Hamilton, and Luttig voted to rehear the case in banc, and Circuit Judges Ervin, Russell, Phillips, Murnaghan, Sprouse, and Hall voted against rehearing in banc.
The original judicial panel voted to deny the petition for rehearing.
The Court denies the petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in banc.
Entered at the direction of Circuit Judge Hall, with the concurrence of Circuit Judge Phillips and Judge Williams, U.S. District Judge, sitting by designation. Circuit Judge Wilkins reserves the right to file a dissenting opinion to the denial of the suggestion for rehearing in banc.