Case Name: Adam Joseph COZART, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-08-02
Citations: 823 So. 2d 234
Docket Number: No. 1D02-0607
Parties: Adam Joseph COZART, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: MINER, KAHN, and WEBSTER, JJ., concur'.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 823
Pages: 234–234

Head Matter:
Adam Joseph COZART, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D02-0607.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Aug. 2, 2002.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and James W. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This direct criminal appeal was brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Having reviewed the entire record, we agree that no reversible error occurred. We affirm the appellant's revocation of probation and imposition of judgment and sentence. However, we note that the record does not contain a written order of revocation of probation. We thus remand for the trial court to enter such an order, consistent with its oral pronouncement. See Walker v. State, 686 So.2d 758 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). The appellant need not be present.
AFFIRMED.
MINER, KAHN, and WEBSTER, JJ., concur'.