Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jaron REEVEY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-11-07
Citations: 204 F. App'x 235
Docket Number: No. 06-4217
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jaron REEVEY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 204
Pages: 235–235

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jaron REEVEY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-4217.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 25, 2006.
Decided: Nov. 7, 2006.
G. Godwin Oyewole, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Christine Manuelian, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Jaron Reevey appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a new trial based on a witness's affidavit purporting to recant her trial testimony. Reevey argues that the district court abused its discretion in denying the motion without holding an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion and no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Reevey, No. 1:02-cr-00146-WDQ (D.Md. Feb. 3, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.