Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio TAFOYA-GONZALES, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-06-01
Citations: 10 F. App'x 593
Docket Number: No. 00-50374; D.C. No. CR-00-20-AHS
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio TAFOYA-GONZALES, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before PREGERSON, FERNANDEZ, and WARD LAW, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 10
Pages: 593–593

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio TAFOYA-GONZALES, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 00-50374.
D.C. No. CR-00-20-AHS.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 7, 2001.
Decided June 1, 2001.
Before PREGERSON, FERNANDEZ, and WARD LAW, Circuit Judges.
. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Antonio Tafoya-Gonzales appeals from his guilty plea conviction and sentence for being an alien found in the United States, following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Tafoya-Gonzales contends that the district court erred when it increased his base offense level by 16 points because the fact that his prior deportation followed an aggravated felony conviction was neither admitted nor proven beyond a reasonable doubt to a jury. He further contends that Apprendi calls into question the continuing validity of Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). These arguments are foreclosed by United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir.2000), as amended (Feb. 8, 2001) (order). United States v. Castillo Rivera, 244 F.3d 1020, 1024-1025 (9th Cir.2001).
AFFIRMED.
. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.