Case Name: Reliance Laundry and Cleaning Company, Plaintiff in error, vs. City of Milwaukee, Defendant in error
Court: Wisconsin Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Wisconsin
Decision Date: 1912-11-19
Citations: 151 Wis. 194
Docket Number: 
Parties: Reliance Laundry and Cleaning Company, Plaintiff in error, vs. City of Milwaukee, Defendant in error.
Judges: 
Reporter: Wisconsin Reports
Volume: 151
Pages: 194–194

Head Matter:
Reliance Laundry and Cleaning Company, Plaintiff in error, vs. City of Milwaukee, Defendant in error.
October 31
November 19, 1912.
Chain Belt Co. v. Milwaukee, ante, p. 188, followed.
Ekeoe to review a judgment of the municipal court of Milwaukee county: Obren T. Williams, Circuit Judge.
Reversed.
For the plaintiff in error there was a brief by Glicksman, Gold & Corrigan, and oral argument by Nathan Glicksman.
For the defendant in error there was a brief by Daniel W. Hoan, city attorney, and E. L. McIntyre, special assistant city attorney, and oral argument by Mr. McIntyre.

Opinion:
Timlin, J.
This case presents the same questions as Chain Belt Co. v. Milwaukee, ante, p. 188, 138 N. W. 621, qnd is ruled by that case.
There was no authority on the part of the city to enact the ordinance under which the defendant was prosecuted and convicted, hence the ordinance is invalid, and the judgment should be reversed.
By the Court. — Judgment reversed, and the cause remanded with directions to dismiss the prosecution.