Case Name: In the Matter of Whitney Museum of American Art, Respondent, v. New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, Appellant, and Hilail Gilden et al., Intervenors-Appellants
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1989-03-23
Citations: 73 N.Y.2d 938
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Whitney Museum of American Art, Respondent, v New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, Appellant, and Hilail Gilden et al., Intervenors-Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 73
Pages: 938–941

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Whitney Museum of American Art, Respondent, v New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, Appellant, and Hilail Gilden et al., Intervenors-Appellants.
Argued February 7, 1989;
decided March 23, 1989
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Sheldon D. Melnitsky and Dennis Hasher for appellant.
Donald Eng, David Rozenholc and Mitchell P. Heaney for Hilail Gilden and others, intervenors-appellants.
Kent Karlsson and William A. Herbert for Peter Dixjhoorn, intervenor-appellant.
Gary M. Rosenberg and Jeffrey Turkel for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (139 AD2d 444). Certified question answered in the affirmative.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, KLaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.