Case Name: CITY OF FARGO, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Richard Kaye NELSON, Defendant and Appellant
Court: North Dakota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: North Dakota
Decision Date: 2018-11-06
Citations: 919 N.W.2d 339
Docket Number: No. 20170424
Parties: CITY OF FARGO, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Richard Kaye NELSON, Defendant and Appellant
Judges: 
Reporter: North Western Reporter 2d
Volume: 919
Pages: 339–340

Head Matter:
CITY OF FARGO, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Richard Kaye NELSON, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20170424
Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Filed November 6, 2018
Ian R. McLean, Fargo, N.D., for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Richard K. Nelson, self-represented, Fargo, N.D., defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
[¶ 1] Richard Kaye Nelson appeals from a civil judgment finding his property constitutes a public nuisance, requiring abatement of the nuisance, and granting a permanent injunction from maintaining a nuisance on the property. Nelson argues the district court abused its discretion in granting a permanent injunction against him and his property.
[¶ 2] We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in granting the injunction and its findings were not clearly erroneous. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (4), and (7). State v. Noack , 2007 ND 82, ¶ 8, 10, 732 N.W.2d 389 (stating that the Court "will not consider an argument that is not adequately articulated, supported, and briefed," because without adequate briefing and citation to authority, we are unable to meaningfully review alleged errors).
[¶ 3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Jerod E. Tufte
Daniel J. Crothers
Jon J. Jensen
Lisa Fair McEvers