Case Name: Marcella Wistafka by Elizabeth Wistafka, Appellee, v. Peter M. Grotowski, Appellant
Court: Illinois Appellate Court
Jurisdiction: Illinois
Decision Date: 1914-06-09
Citations: 187 Ill. App. 285
Docket Number: Gen. No. 19,286
Parties: Marcella Wistafka by Elizabeth Wistafka, Appellee, v. Peter M. Grotowski, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Illinois Appellate Court Reports
Volume: 187
Pages: 285–286

Head Matter:
Marcella Wistafka by Elizabeth Wistafka, Appellee, v. Peter M. Grotowski, Appellant.
Gen. No. 19,286.
(Not to he reported in full.)
Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Charles A. McDonald, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1913.
Reversed and remanded.
Opinion filed June 9, 1914.
Rehearing denied June 23, 1914.
Statement of the Case.
Action by Marcella Wistafka, a minor, by Elizabeth Wistafka, against Peter M. Grotowski to recover for a dog bite. From a judgment entered on a verdict for plaintiff for five hundred dollars, defendant appeals.
P. R. Boylan, for appellant.
Julius Limbach, for appellee.
See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols XI to XV, and Cum,illative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Opinion:
Mr. Justice Clark
delivered the opinion of the court.
Abstract of the Decision.
Animals, § 43 —when evidence insufficient to sustain recovery for dog hite. In an action to recover for injuries sustained by being bitten by a dog claimed to have been owned by defendant, a verdict for plaintiff, held not sustained by the evidence, where the defendant testified that no one ever complained to him that the dog was cross, and plaintiff's witness testified that a year before plaintiff was bitten she saw the dog bite a hoy hut that she never told anybody except the attorney for plaintiff and her mother, and on cross-examination admitted she could not swear it was defendant's dog.