Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Marcos Mora JIMENEZ, also known as Marcos M. Jimenez, also known as Marcos Mora-Jimenez, also known as Marco Jimenez Mora, also known as Marcos Jimenez, also known as Marcos Mora, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-01-05
Citations: 407 F. App'x 803
Docket Number: No. 09-20707
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Marcos Mora JIMENEZ, also known as Marcos M. Jimenez, also known as Marcos Mora-Jimenez, also known as Marco Jimenez Mora, also known as Marcos Jimenez, also known as Marcos Mora, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before JOLLY, GARZA, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 407
Pages: 803–803

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Marcos Mora JIMENEZ, also known as Marcos M. Jimenez, also known as Marcos Mora-Jimenez, also known as Marco Jimenez Mora, also known as Marcos Jimenez, also known as Marcos Mora, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-20707
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Jan. 5, 2011.
James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Sarah Beth Landau, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Marcos Mora Jimenez, Conroe, TX, pro se.
Before JOLLY, GARZA, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Marcos Mora Jimenez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Mora Jimenez has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel's brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.