Case Name: In re ROBINSON BROTHERS DRILLING, INC., and Robinson Brothers Drilling Company, Debtors. MANUFACTURERS HANOVER LEASING CORP.; Halliburton Company; Gray Tool Company; and Ponder Fishing Tools, Inc., Defendants-Appellants, v. Harold G. LOWREY, Chapter 11 Trustee, for the Estate of the Debtors, Plaintiff-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1989-11-09
Citations: 892 F.2d. 850
Docket Number: No. 88-2982
Parties: In re ROBINSON BROTHERS DRILLING, INC., and Robinson Brothers Drilling Company, Debtors. MANUFACTURERS HANOVER LEASING CORP.; Halliburton Company; Gray Tool Company; and Ponder Fishing Tools, Inc., Defendants-Appellants, v. Harold G. LOWREY, Chapter 11 Trustee, for the Estate of the Debtors, Plaintiff-Appellee.
Judges: Before TACHA, BARRETT, and BRORBY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Bankruptcy Reporter
Volume: 108
Pages: 850–850

Head Matter:
In re ROBINSON BROTHERS DRILLING, INC., and Robinson Brothers Drilling Company, Debtors. MANUFACTURERS HANOVER LEASING CORP.; Halliburton Company; Gray Tool Company; and Ponder Fishing Tools, Inc., Defendants-Appellants, v. Harold G. LOWREY, Chapter 11 Trustee, for the Estate of the Debtors, Plaintiff-Appellee.
No. 88-2982.
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
Nov. 9, 1989.
Theodore Gewertz (Lawrence P. King, of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, New York City; James Vogt, Norman E. Reynolds, and V. Burns Hargis, of Reynolds, Ridings & Hargis, Oklahoma City, Okl., Richard Gerard, of Mfrs. Hanover Leasing Corp., New York City, Robert N. Sheets, of Phillips, McFall, McVay, Sheets, Juras & Lovelace, Doneen Douglas Jones, of Fellers, Snider, Blankenship, Bailey & Tippens, and Bruce Kerr, of Mahaffey & Gore, Oklahoma City, Okl., with him on the brief), of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, New York City, for defendants-appellants.
Gary L. Morrissey of Kenan & Peterson, Oklahoma City, Okl, for plaintiff-appellee.
John J. Gill, General Counsel, and Michael F. Crotty, Associate General Counsel, of the American Bankers Ass’n, Washington, D.C., amicus curiae.
Before TACHA, BARRETT, and BRORBY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the judgment of the district court below and adopt its opinion, which is published at 97 B.R. 77.