Case Name: Kenny WALTERS, Plaintiff, and Sherri WALTERS and Cheyenne L. Walters, by and through her guardian ad litem Sherri Walters, Respondents, v. John M. HOBBS, M.D., and John M. Hobbs, Jr., M.D., P.C., an Oregon professional corporation, Appellants, and MERLE WEST MEDICAL CENTER, an Oregon non-profit corporation, Defendants
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2001-10-31
Citations: 177 Or. App. 527
Docket Number: 9500602CV; A102298
Parties: Kenny WALTERS, Plaintiff, and Sherri WALTERS and Cheyenne L. Walters, by and through her guardian ad litem Sherri Walters, Respondents, v. John M. HOBBS, M.D., and John M. Hobbs, Jr., M.D., P.C., an Oregon professional corporation, Appellants, and MERLE WEST MEDICAL CENTER, an Oregon non-profit corporation, Defendants.
Judges: Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Deits, Chief Judge, and Wollheim, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 177
Pages: 527–529

Head Matter:
On respondents’ petition for reconsideration filed September 4,
reconsideration allowed; opinion (176 Or App 194, 30 P3d 1214) adhered to as modified October 31, 2001
Kenny WALTERS, Plaintiff, and Sherri WALTERS and Cheyenne L. Walters, by and through her guardian ad litem Sherri Walters, Respondents, v. John M. HOBBS, M.D., and John M. Hobbs, Jr., M.D., P.C., an Oregon professional corporation, Appellants, and MERLE WEST MEDICAL CENTER, an Oregon non-profit corporation, Defendants.
9500602CV; A102298
33 P3d 1067
Rebecca Whitney-Smith and Ratliff & Whitney-Smith for petition.
Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Deits, Chief Judge, and Wollheim, Judge.
HASELTON, P. J.
Deits, C. J., vice Ceniceros, S. J.

Opinion:
HASELTON, P. J.
Plaintiffs petition for reconsideration of our opinion in Walters v. Hobbs, 176 Or App 194, 30 P3d 1214 (2001), in which we affirmed, without discussion, an award of damages to plaintiff Cheyenne Walters, and reversed an award to plaintiff Sherri Walters. Plaintiffs point out that we erroneously stated in our opinion that the jury awarded Cheyenne Walters $57,741 in economic damages when, in fact, the jury awarded Cheyenne Walters $577,741 in economic damages. We agree and correct our misstatement.
The amount of economic damages awarded to Cheyenne Walters makes no difference in our analysis in the case. However, because we affirmed the award of damages to Cheyenne Walters without discussion, we correct the error in order to make clear to the trial court what portions of its judgment we have affirmed.
Reconsideration allowed; opinion adhered to as modified.