Case Name: ARMCO ADVANCED MATERIALS CORPORATION and Allegheny Ludlum Corporation v. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION Appeal of WEST PENN POWER COMPANY. WEST PENN POWER COMPANY, Appellant v. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, Appellee; ARMCO ADVANCED MATERIALS CORPORATION and Allegheny Ludlum Corporation v. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION Appeal of PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. WEST PENN POWER COMPANY, Appellee, v. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, Appellant; ARMCO ADVANCED MATERIALS CORPORATION and Allegheny Ludlum Corporation, Appellants, v. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, Appellee; WEST PENN POWER COMPANY v. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. Appeal of ARMCO ADVANCED MATERIALS CORPORATION and Allegheny Ludlum Corporation
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1993-11-24
Citations: 535 Pa. 108
Docket Number: Appeal Nos. 0109-0111 W.D. Appeal Docket 1991
Parties: ARMCO ADVANCED MATERIALS CORPORATION and Allegheny Ludlum Corporation v. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION Appeal of WEST PENN POWER COMPANY. WEST PENN POWER COMPANY, Appellant v. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, Appellee. ARMCO ADVANCED MATERIALS CORPORATION and Allegheny Ludlum Corporation v. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION Appeal of PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. WEST PENN POWER COMPANY, Appellee, v. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, Appellant. ARMCO ADVANCED MATERIALS CORPORATION and Allegheny Ludlum Corporation, Appellants, v. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, Appellee. WEST PENN POWER COMPANY v. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. Appeal of ARMCO ADVANCED MATERIALS CORPORATION and Allegheny Ludlum Corporation.
Judges: Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN FLAHERTY, ZAPPALA, PAPADAKOS, CAPPY, and MONTEMURO, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 535
Pages: 108–120

Head Matter:
634 A.2d 207
ARMCO ADVANCED MATERIALS CORPORATION and Allegheny Ludlum Corporation v. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION Appeal of WEST PENN POWER COMPANY. WEST PENN POWER COMPANY, Appellant v. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, Appellee. ARMCO ADVANCED MATERIALS CORPORATION and Allegheny Ludlum Corporation v. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION Appeal of PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. WEST PENN POWER COMPANY, Appellee, v. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, Appellant. ARMCO ADVANCED MATERIALS CORPORATION and Allegheny Ludlum Corporation, Appellants, v. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, Appellee. WEST PENN POWER COMPANY v. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. Appeal of ARMCO ADVANCED MATERIALS CORPORATION and Allegheny Ludlum Corporation.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued Sept. 24, 1992.
Resubmitted May 27, 1993.
Decided Nov. 24, 1993.
Drew Kovalak, Michael D. McDowell, and John L. Munsch, West Penn Power Co., Greensburg, for appellant at No. 109 and appellees at Nos. 110 and 111.
John F. Povilaitis, Chief Counsel, Bohdan R. Pankiw and Lee E. Morrison, Pennsylvania Public Utility Com’n, Harrisburg, for appellant at No. 110 and appellees at Nos. 109 and 111.
James J. Flaherty, Thomas E. Boettger, and Michael E. Flaherty, Flaherty & Sheehy, P.C., Pittsburgh, for Milesburg Energy, Inc., appellee intervenor at No. 110.
David F. Boehm and Michael L. Kurtz, Boehm, Kurtz & Lowry, Cincinnati, OH, and Terrence F. McVerry, Grogan, Graffam, McGinley & Lucchino, P.C., Pittsburgh, for Armco Advanced Materials Corp. and Allegheny Ludlum Corp.
Clifford B. Levine and Alice B. Mitinger, Thorp, Reed & Armstrong, Pittsburgh, for Mon Valley Energy, Inc.
Marvin A. Fein and Philip Baskin, Houston Harbaugh, P.C., Pittsburgh, for North Branch Energy, Inc.
Tanya J. McCloskey and Phillip F. McClelland, Asst. Consumer Advocates, Harrisburg, for Irwin Popowsky.
Raymond J. Hoehler, Greensburg, for Burgettstown Project.
Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN FLAHERTY, ZAPPALA, PAPADAKOS, CAPPY, and MONTEMURO, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Prior Report: 135 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 15, 579 A.2d 1337.
Order affirmed.
NIX, C.J., and CAPPY and MONTEMURO, JJ., affirm.
FLAHERTY, ZAPPALA and PAPADAKOS, JJ., affirm in part and would reverse in part.
PAPADAKOS, J., files a concurring and dissenting opinion in which FLAHERTY and ZAPPALA, JJ., join.
LARSEN, J., did not participate in the decision of this case.