Case Name: Ida Werter et al., Appellants, v. Augusta Samsky, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1944-11-13
Citations: 268 A.D. 913
Docket Number: 
Parties: Ida Werter et al., Appellants, v. Augusta Samsky, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 268
Pages: 913–914

Head Matter:
Ida Werter et al., Appellants, v. Augusta Samsky, Respondent.

Opinion:
Action by plaintiff Ida Werter to recover damages for personal injuries, sustained as the result of a fall which occurred when she lost her balance by reason of the moving wademeath her foot of a loose door saddle, eoastituting part of premises which had been leased by defendant, and by her husband to recover for medical expenses and damages for loss of services. Judgment dismissing the complaint on the merits unanimously affirmed, with costs. The facts do not warrant a departure from the doctrine enunciated in Cullings v. Goetz (256 N. Y. 287). Present — Hagarty, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Lewis and Aldrich, JJ.