Case Name: Harry D. Hanson et al., Respondents, v. Joseph Kaplan, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1900-11
Citations: 33 Misc. 746
Docket Number: 
Parties: Harry D. Hanson et al., Respondents, v. Joseph Kaplan, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 33
Pages: 746–746

Head Matter:
Harry D. Hanson et al., Respondents, v. Joseph Kaplan, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, sixth district, borough of Manhattan.
H. Levor, for appellant.
/ Da Fetra & Glaze, for respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
There is a direct conflict of evidence here. This conflict has been decided by the "justice who tried the case, and with his decision, we shall not interfere.
The exceptions on pages 51, 52, 53, 58, 11 and 11 of the stenographer^ minutes are not well taken. If the defendant employed the plaintiffs and jpromised to pay them it is immaterial to whom the horses belonged.
Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dttgro, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.