Case Name: WILLIAM B. HARRIS CO., Appellant, v. KIRCHOFER et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1906-06-01
Citations: 99 N.Y.S. 1151
Docket Number: 
Parties: WILLIAM B. HARRIS CO., Appellant, v. KIRCHOFER et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 99
Pages: 1151–1151

Head Matter:
WILLIAM B. HARRIS CO., Appellant, v. KIRCHOFER et al., Respondents.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
June 1, 1906.)
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Second District. Action by the William B. Harris Company against Louis P. Kirchofer and another. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.
Reversed and remanded.
Alfrd R. Bunnell, for appellant.
Maurice M. Greenstein, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In affirming this judgment we were led to believe that the admission in the answer by the defendants of a liability to the plaintiff and a tender of the admitted amount due had been followed up by a payment of such amount into court. It now appears that such was not the fact, and therefore the judgment should have been reversed. Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.