Case Name: NATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION, Mark I. Evans, M.D., Carolyn Westhoff, M.D., Cassing Hammond, M.D., Marc Heller, M.D., Timothy R.B. Johnson, M.D., Stephen Chasen, M.D., and Gerson Weiss, M.D., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Alberto GONZALES, in his capacity as Attorney General of the United States, along with his officers, agents, servants, employees, and successors in office, Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-04-25
Citations: 489 F.3d 125
Docket Number: No. 04-5201-CV
Parties: NATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION, Mark I. Evans, M.D., Carolyn Westhoff, M.D., Cassing Hammond, M.D., Marc Heller, M.D., Timothy R.B. Johnson, M.D., Stephen Chasen, M.D., and Gerson Weiss, M.D., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Alberto GONZALES, in his capacity as Attorney General of the United States, along with his officers, agents, servants, employees, and successors in office, Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: Present: JON O. NEWMAN, JOHN M. WALKER, JR., and CHESTER J. STRAUB, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 489
Pages: 125–126

Head Matter:
NATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION, Mark I. Evans, M.D., Carolyn Westhoff, M.D., Cassing Hammond, M.D., Marc Heller, M.D., Timothy R.B. Johnson, M.D., Stephen Chasen, M.D., and Gerson Weiss, M.D., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Alberto GONZALES, in his capacity as Attorney General of the United States, along with his officers, agents, servants, employees, and successors in office, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 04-5201-CV.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
April 25, 2007.
A. Stephen Hut, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr, LLP, Washington, DC, Rebekah Diller, New York Civil Liberties Union Foundation, Susan Talcott Camp, American Civil Liberties Union, New York, NY, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.
Sean H. Lane, U.S. Attorney’s Office, New York, NY, for Defendants-Appellants.
Present: JON O. NEWMAN, JOHN M. WALKER, JR., and CHESTER J. STRAUB, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
JOHN M. WALKER, JR., Circuit Judge.
By order dated March 7, 2006, this court stayed further briefing on the issue of remedy pending the decision by the Supreme Court in Gonzales v. Carhart. On April 18, 2007, the Supreme Court rendered its decision in Carhart, — U.S. —, 127 S.Ct. 1610, 167 L.Ed.2d 480 (2007). Following our usual practice of allowing the parties to present their views following a relevant Supreme Court decision, see, e.g., Muhammad v. City of N.Y. Dep't of Corr., 126 F.3d 119, 122 (2d Cir.1997); United States v. Vasquez, 85 F.3d 59, 60 (2d Cir.1996), we offer the parties the opportunity to comment on the effect of Carhart on this appeal.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties shall file, within 14 days, letter briefs, not to exceed ten double-spaced pages, setting forth their views on the appropriate disposition of the appeal. The judgment of the district court is STAYED forthwith.