Case Name: In the Matter of the Application of The City of New York, Respondent, Relative to Acquiring Title, etc., for the Opening and Extending of East Two Hundred and Twenty-second Street (Formerly Eighth Street or Avenue), etc.
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1914-07
Citations: 164 A.D. 880
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Application of The City of New York, Respondent, Relative to Acquiring Title, etc., for the Opening and Extending of East Two Hundred and Twenty-second Street (Formerly Eighth Street or Avenue), etc.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 164
Pages: 880–882

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Application of The City of New York, Respondent, Relative to Acquiring Title, etc., for the Opening and Extending of East Two Hundred and Twenty-second Street (Formerly Eighth Street or Avenue), etc.
Carolyn Foster Princesse Aymoh de Faucigny Lucinge (Formerly Carolyn Foster Stickney) and Others, Appellants.
Eminent domain — street opening — New York city — block to block rule — apportioning expense of condemnation.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, entered in the Hew York county clerk’s office on the 18th day of August, 1913, confirming a supplemental and amended report of commissioners of estimate and assessment.

Opinion:
Order affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. McLaughlin and Scott, JJ., dissented.