Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher Michael STANTON, a.k.a. Christopher Stanton, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-05-30
Citations: 474 F. App'x 760
Docket Number: No. 10-15637
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher Michael STANTON, a.k.a. Christopher Stanton, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILSON, JORDAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 474
Pages: 760–760

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher Michael STANTON, a.k.a. Christopher Stanton, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-15637
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
May 30, 2012.
Robert G. Davies, Nancy J. Hess, Thomas F. Kirwin, Edwin F. Knight, Lennard B. Register, III, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Pensacola, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Chet Kaufman, Randolph P. Murrell, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Tallahassee, FL, Christopher Michael Stanton, USP Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before WILSON, JORDAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Christopher Stanton in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant, and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Stanton's convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.