Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Luis Naranjo, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1996-03-19
Citations: 225 A.D.2d 392
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Luis Naranjo, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 225
Pages: 392–392

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Luis Naranjo, Appellant.
[640 NYS2d 13]

Opinion:
Defendant's "inferential bolstering" claim is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review it, we would find that any "inferential bolstering" error that may have occurred in this case was rendered harmless by the overwhelming evidence of guilt (People v Johnson, 57 NY2d 969).
We find that the sentence was not unduly influenced by the court's consideration of an uncharged crime (see, People v Migliore, 150 AD2d 169, lv denied 74 NY2d 815), and was otherwise a proper exercise of discretion. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Rosenberger, Ross and Mazzarelli, JJ.