Case Name: CITY OF ROME v. BROWN
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1936-06-09
Citations: 54 Ga. App. 6
Docket Number: 25424
Parties: CITY OF ROME v. BROWN.
Judges: Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 54
Pages: 6–9

Head Matter:
25424.
CITY OF ROME v. BROWN.
Decided June 9, 1936.
Rehearing denied July 6, 1936.
W. B. Mebane, for plaintiff in error. Maddox & Griffin, contra.

Opinion:
Sutton, J.
A. D. Brown, after furnishing the City of Rome with the required statutory notice of his claim, filed his action for damages against said municipality, alleging that he was the owner of a certain house and lot in said city, fronting 50 feet on East 12th Street; that during the fall of 1931, and the winter of 1932, the defendant, acting by and through its duly authorized agents and employees, the Minge Construction Company, raised the street and sidewalk in front of plaintiff's property about 14 inches, "thus forming a dam, so that water falling on said property and running thereon in its natural course can not escape and drain therefrom, but is caused to stand and pond;" that before this the water did not pond on plaintiff's property but drained off into a ditch, but now, after a rain, the water stands for days on his lot and until it sinks into the ground, thus' causing the ground to be wet and damp at all times except in "extreme dry weather;" that as a result of the water so standing on this property the sills and floors of a house located there have rotted out, and it has become necessary to replace the sills and floor to the back porch thereof at a cost of $20, and it is necessary that the sills and floor to the re mainder of tlie house be replaced, which will cost $100; that water so standing and ponding on plaintiff's lot has caused mosquitoes to breed, and two of his children to become sick, as set out; that the defendant was negligent in raising the street and sidewalk without putting in drains to take care of the water and prevent it from so standing and ponding on plaintiff's lot, which "is a continuing nuisance for which the defendant is liable;" that before the acts complained of the plaintiff's property had a reasonable market value of $1200, but that now its reasonable market value does not exceed $900; and that defendant, by reason of the foregoing facts, has damaged plaintiff in the sum of $400. The defendant filed its general demurrer to the petition, and to a judgment overruling the demurrer it excepted.
The petition, both on the question of negligence and on the question of a nuisance, presents a matter for determination by a jury, and the judge properly overruled the demurrer. When a municipality, in constructing a public improvement, so obstructs the natural flow of surface-water as to cause the water to pond on the land of an abutting owner, and the city provides no means of outlet for such water, it becomes liable to the property owner for any damages occasioned to his property thereby. Also, if the ponding of such water on private property constitutes a nuisance which the city fails to abate, the municipality may be held liable. The plaintiff charges that the city was negligent in raising the street and sidewalk above the level of his lot, thus causing surface-water to accumulate and pond upon his property, without providing any drain or outlet to take care of such accumulated water. The raising of the street, and sidewalk by the city in front of the plaintiff's property, thereby damming up the surface-water and causing it to pond thereon, which but for said obstruction would flow off plaintiff's property, without providing any outlet for such surface-water, was negligence on the part of the municipality and would render it liable for damages to adjacent property caused by the water overflowing and ponding thereon. Code, § 69-301; Maguire v. Cartersville, 76 Ga. 84; Brunswick v. Tucker, 103 Ga. 233, 236 (29 S. E. 701, 68 Am. St. R. 92); Massengale v. Atlanta, 113 Ga. 966 (39 S. E. 578); Langley v. Augusta, 118 Ga. 590 (45 S. E. 486, 98 Am. St. R. 133); City of Albany v. Simon, 36 Ga. App. 166 (136 S. E. 100); Harris v. Rome, 10 Ga. App. 409 (73 S. E. 542); City of Atlanta v. Trussell, 21 Ga. App. 340, 343 (94 S. E. 649); Bass Canning Co. v. Milledgeville, 174 Ga. 222 (162 S. E. 687); Lewis v. Moultrie, 27 Ga. App. 757 (110 S. E. 625); Holbrook v. Norcross, 121 Ga. 319 (48 S. E. 922). See also 43 C. J. 1124 et seq., 1143-1146.
Judgment affirmed.
Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.