Case Name: Central Railroad Company of New Jersey and the Board of Public Utility Commissioners of the State of New Jersey, complainants-respondents, v. Emanuel Simandl, Benton & Holden, Inc., and Anna Miskiw, defendants-appellants
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1939-02-06
Citations: 125 N.J. Eq. 91
Docket Number: 
Parties: Central Railroad Company of New Jersey and the Board of Public Utility Commissioners of the State of New Jersey, complainants-respondents, v. Emanuel Simandl, Benton & Holden, Inc., and Anna Miskiw, defendants-appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 125
Pages: 91–91

Head Matter:
Central Railroad Company of New Jersey and the Board of Public Utility Commissioners of the State of New Jersey, complainants-respondents, v. Emanuel Simandl, Benton & Holden, Inc., and Anna Miskiw, defendants-appellants.
[Argued October term, 1938.
Decided February 6th, 1939.]
Mr. Harold Simandl, for Emanuel Simandl.
Mr. Joseph B. Kane and Mr. Samuel Koestler, for Benton & Holden, Inc., and Anna Miskiw.
Mr. Gharles E. Miller, for Central Railroad Company.
Mr. Franlc H. Sommer and Mr. John A. Bernhard, for Board of Public Utility Commissioners.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We have carefully examined the pleadings and proofs in this case, the argument and briefs of counsel, and we concur in the conclusion of the learned vice-chancellor that a preliminary injunction should issue.
The- order appealed from is affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Walker, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.