Case Name: COON v. KENNEDY
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1919-01-13
Citations: 248 U.S. 457
Docket Number: No. 398
Parties: COON v. KENNEDY.
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 248
Pages: 457–458

Head Matter:
COON v. KENNEDY.
ERROR TO THE COURT OP ERRORS AND APPEALS OP THE STATE OP NEW JERSEY.
No. 398.
Argued December 11, 1918.
Decided January 13, 1919.
Under Jud. Code, § 237, as amended September 6,1916, a writ oferror does not lie to a judgment of a state court holding the state Workmen’s Compensation Law inapplicable to a case of personal injuries governed by the maritime law and holding the Act of October 6, 1917, which changes the rule in that regard, inapplicable retrospectively.
Writ of error to review 91 N. J. L. 598, dismissed.
The cáse is stated in the opinion.
Mr. James D. Carpenter, Jr., for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Isidor Kalisch for defendant in error.

Opinion:
Memorandum opinion by
Mr. Justice McReynolds.
This writ of error runs to a judgment of the Court of Errors and Appeals of New Jersey filed March 11, 1918, 91 N. J. L. 598, denying relief to Rebecca Coon who sued to recover under the New Jersey Workmen's Compensation Act on. account of her husband's death by drowning in the navigable waters of that State whik employed as a fireman on a tug boat.
The court held that as the accident occurred August 4, 1915, the Act of Congress approved October 6,1917, c. 97, 40 Stat. 395, "saving . to claimants the rights and remedies under the workmen's compensation law of any State" was inapplicable, and that under the doctrine announced in Southern Pacific Co. v. Jensen, 244 U. S. 205, the rights of the parties depended upon the maritime law of the United States.
There was no decision against the validity of a treaty or statute of or an authority exercised under the United States, nor in favor of the validity of a statute of or an authority exercised under a State challenged because of repugnance to the Constitution, treaties or laws of the United States. Consequently, under the Act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, 39 Stat. 726, the writ of error was improperly sued out and must be
Dismissed.