Case Name: Brunson v. North Carolina; King v. North Carolina; Jones v. North Carolina; James et al. v. North Carolina; and Watkins et al. v. North Carolina
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1948-03-15
Citations: 333 U.S. 851
Docket Number: No. 292; No. 293; No. 294; No. 295; No. 296
Parties: Brunson v. North Carolina; King v. North Carolina; Jones v. North Carolina; James et al. v. North Carolina; and Watkins et al. v. North Carolina.
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 333
Pages: 851–851

Head Matter:
March 15, 1948.
No. 292.
No. 293.
No. 294.
No. 295.
No. 296.
Brunson v. North Carolina; King v. North Carolina; Jones v. North Carolina; James et al. v. North Carolina; and Watkins et al. v. North Carolina.
Argued February 3, 1948.
Decided March 15, 1948.
William Reid Dalton argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was Nathan Witt.
Ralph Moody, Assistant Attorney General of North Carolina, argued the cause for respondent.
With him on the brief were Harry McMullan, Attorney General, and James E. Tucker, Assistant Attorney General.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
Reversed. Strauder v. West Virginia, 100 U. S. 303; Ex parte Virginia, 100 U. S. 339; Neal v. Delaware, 103 U. S. 370; Carter v. Texas, 177 U. S. 442; Rogers v. Alabama, 192 U. S. 226; Norris v. Alabama, 294 U. S. 587; Hollins v. Oklahoma, 295 U. S. 394; Hale v. Kentucky, 303 U. S. 613; Pierre v. Louisiana, 306 U. S. 354; Smith v. Texas, 311 U. S. 128; Hill v. Texas, 316 U. S. 400; Patton v. Mississippi, 332 U. S. 463.
Reported below: 227 N. C. 558, 559, 560, 561, 43 S. E. 2d 82, 83.