Case Name: Randy L. THOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Graham C. MULLEN, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-10-22
Citations: 251 F. App'x 212
Docket Number: No. 07-1716
Parties: Randy L. THOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Graham C. MULLEN, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 251
Pages: 212–213

Head Matter:
Randy L. THOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Graham C. MULLEN, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 07-1716.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 18, 2007.
Decided: Oct. 22, 2007.
Randy L. Thomas, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Randy L. Thomas appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thomas v. Mullen, No. 3:07-cv-00231-FDW (W.D.N.C. June 19, 2007). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.