Case Name: Malcolm MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Marvin Eley; David Foltz, Plaintiffs, v. L.J. FLEMING, Warden; T. Barbetto; S. Fuller; R. Perkins, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-10-14
Citations: 618 F. App'x 183
Docket Number: No. 15-6732
Parties: Malcolm MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Marvin Eley; David Foltz, Plaintiffs, v. L.J. FLEMING, Warden; T. Barbetto; S. Fuller; R. Perkins, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before KING, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 618
Pages: 183–183

Head Matter:
Malcolm MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Marvin Eley; David Foltz, Plaintiffs, v. L.J. FLEMING, Warden; T. Barbetto; S. Fuller; R. Perkins, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15-6732.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 15, 2015.
Decided: Oct. 14, 2015.
Malcolm Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se. Kate Elizabeth Dwyre, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before KING, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Malcolm Muhammad appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Muhammad v. Fleming, No. 7:14-cv-00421-JLK-RSB (W-D.Va. Apr. 28, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.