Case Name: Anthony JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. G. SINDY, in his individual capacity; R. Roderick, in his individual capacity; Dr. Jack Cunning, in his individual capacity, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-10-20
Citations: 585 F. App'x 16
Docket Number: No. 14-6786
Parties: Anthony JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. G. SINDY, in his individual capacity; R. Roderick, in his individual capacity; Dr. Jack Cunning, in his individual capacity, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 585
Pages: 16–17

Head Matter:
Anthony JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. G. SINDY, in his individual capacity; R. Roderick, in his individual capacity; Dr. Jack Cunning, in his individual capacity, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 14-6786.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 16, 2014.
Decided: Oct. 20, 2014.
Anthony Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Johnson appeals the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Svndy, No. 8:14-cv-01188-DKC (D.Md. Apr. 28, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.