Case Name: Cudahy and another, Respondents, vs. Crittenden, imp., Appellant; Eldredge and others, Respondents, vs. Crittenden, imp., Appellant
Court: Wisconsin Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Wisconsin
Decision Date: 1889-09-24
Citations: 74 Wis. 463
Docket Number: 
Parties: Cudahy and another, Respondents, vs. Crittenden, imp., Appellant. Eldredge and others, Respondents, vs. Crittenden, imp., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Wisconsin Reports
Volume: 74
Pages: 463–464

Head Matter:
Cudahy and another, Respondents, vs. Crittenden, imp., Appellant. Eldredge and others, Respondents, vs. Crittenden, imp., Appellant.
September 11
September 24, 1889.
Nichols v. Crittenden, ante, p. 459, followed.
APPEALS from the Circuit Court for Milwaukee County.
For the appellant there were briefs by A. G. Weissert, and for the defendant McGeoch briefs by Finches, Lynde c& Miller, and the causes were argued orally bjr B. K. Miller, Jr.
For the respondents there were briefs by Shepard c& Shepard and Flower, Ferny <& Holstein, and oral argument by O. E. Shepard.

Opinion:
The following opinion was filed in each case:
Cassoday, J.
The record in this case discloses similar facts, and presents the same questions of law for determination as in the case of Nichols v. Crittenden, decided herewith [ante, p. 459]. For the reasons given in the opinion filed in that case, the order of the -circuit court is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings according to law.