Case Name: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Leyshon
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1994-02-02
Citations: 68 Ohio St. 3d 202
Docket Number: No. 93-1712
Parties: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Leyshon.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 68
Pages: 202–205

Head Matter:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Leyshon.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Leyshon (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 202.]
(No. 93-1712
Submitted September 28, 1993
Decided February 2, 1994.)
Geoffrey Stem, Disciplinary Counsel, and Sally A. Steuk, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.
James N. Perry, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We agree with the board's findings and recommendations. Accordingly, we suspend respondent from the practice of law for two years, with the final year of the suspension stayed for a probationary period of two years, if during this period the respondent receives continuing treatment from a licensed psychiatrist or psychologist such as Dr. Siddall. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur.
Pfeifer, J., dissents and would suspend respondent from the practice of law for one year, with six months stayed.