Case Name: Thomas O'Connell et al., Appellants, v. City of New York, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2007-06-26
Citations: 41 A.D.3d 328
Docket Number: 
Parties: Thomas O’Connell et al., Appellants, v City of New York, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 41
Pages: 328–328

Head Matter:
Thomas O’Connell et al., Appellants, v City of New York, Respondent.
[837 NYS2d 568]

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.), entered April 18, 2006, which, insofar as appealable, denied plaintiffs' motion to renew a prior order, same court and Justice, entered June 10, 2005, denying plaintiffs' motion to restore action to a prenote of issue calendar, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiffs fail to provide any justification why the newly submitted evidence—a case status report that needed only to be filled out and mailed back to the court, and a letter from plaintiffs' then-attorney stating that the case status report was completed and enclosed—was not submitted on the original motion (CPLR 2221 [e] [3]). Concur—Sullivan, J.P., Buckley, Gonzalez, Sweeny and Kavanagh, JJ.