Case Name: WARTH PAINT COMPANY, INC., Appellant, v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1976-07-27
Citations: 336 So. 2d 372
Docket Number: No. 75-1632
Parties: WARTH PAINT COMPANY, INC., Appellant, v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.
Judges: Before PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ., and SACK, MARTIN, Associate Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 336
Pages: 372–373

Head Matter:
WARTH PAINT COMPANY, INC., Appellant, v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.
No. 75-1632.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 27, 1976.
Rehearing Denied Aug. 31, 1976.
Alfred D. Bieley, Miami, for appellant.
Bradford, Williams, McKay, Kimbrell, Hamann & Jennings and Thomas E. Scott, Jr., Dixon, Dixon, Lane & Mitchell, Miami, for appellee.
Before PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ., and SACK, MARTIN, Associate Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The plaintiff and defendant Government Employees Insurance Company stipulated that the trial court should determine the issue of the coverage upon the record before the court at that time. The court found that there was no further coverage under the policy sued upon and discharged the insurance company. Appellant has failed to show that the finding of the trial court is not based upon factual considerations reasonably supported by the record or that the trial judge did not correctly apply applicable rules of law.
Affirmed.