Case Name: Commonwealth v. Holloway, Appellant
Court: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1966-10-25
Citations: 208 Pa. Super. 482
Docket Number: Appeals, Nos. 603 and 604
Parties: Commonwealth v. Holloway, Appellant.
Judges: Before Weight, Watkins, Montgomery, Jacobs, Hoepman, and Spaulding, JJ. (Ervin, P. J., absent).
Reporter: Pennsylvania Superior Court Reports
Volume: 208
Pages: 482–483

Head Matter:
Commonwealth v. Holloway, Appellant.
Argued September 14, 1966.
Before Weight, Watkins, Montgomery, Jacobs, Hoepman, and Spaulding, JJ. (Ervin, P. J., absent).
reargument refused November 16, 1966.
James C. Buckley, with him Reed, Gibbons and Buckley, for appellant.
Tram 8. Nedurian, Jr., Assistant District Attorney, with him Ralph B. D’lorio, Assistant District Attorney, Paul R. Sand, First Assistant District Attorney, and Jacques H. Fox, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.
October 25, 1966:

Opinion:
Opinion
Per Curiam,
The six judges who heard the argument of this appeal being equally divided in opinion, the judgment of sentence of the court below is affirmed. The defendant is directed to appear in the court below at such time as he may be there called, and that he be by that court committed until he has complied with the sentence, or any part of it which had not been performed at the time the appeal was made a supersedeas.
Hoffman, Jacobs, and Spaulding, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Hoffman, J., in Com v. Young, 208 Pa. Superior Ct. 478, 223 A. 2d 527 (1966).