Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rigoberto Munoz PICAZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-10-24
Citations: 251 F. App'x 815
Docket Number: No. 07-6725
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Rigoberto Munoz PICAZ, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 251
Pages: 815–816

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Rigoberto Munoz PICAZ, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 07-6725.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 18, 2007.
Decided: Oct. 24, 2007.
Rigoberto Munoz Picaz, Appellant pro se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Rigoberto Munoz Picaz appeals the district court's order denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Picaz, No. 5:03-cr-00201 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 2, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.