Case Name: In the Interest of: T.D.F., J.B.C. and S.R.C.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2009-06-09
Citations: 288 S.W.3d 778
Docket Number: No. ED 91905
Parties: In the Interest of: T.D.F., J.B.C. and S.R.C.
Judges: Before KURT S. ODENWALD, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 288
Pages: 778–779

Head Matter:
In the Interest of: T.D.F., J.B.C. and S.R.C.
No. ED 91905.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
June 9, 2009.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 3, 2009.
Kourtney E. Lamb, Arnold, MO, for appellant.
Rebecca J. Beach, Arnold, MO, for Guardian Ad Litem.
Theodore R. Allen, Jr., Hillsboro, MO, for respondent.
Before KURT S. ODENWALD, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
S.S. (Mother) appeals from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Jefferson County terminating her parental rights to her children T.F., Jr., J.C., and S.C. Mother contends that the trial court erred because: (1) the Children's Division rather than an objective observer prepared the investigation and social study required under Section 211.455.3 RSMo; and (2) the Children's Division did not make reasonable efforts to assist Mother in securing medication for her mental condition. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the trial court's decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
. The trial court also terminated the parental rights of the children's fathers. They do not appeal.