Case Name: NOCERA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ASI ACQUISITION CORPORATION; Robert L. Cashman; Karen Fowler; Trade Leasing, Inc., Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-07-20
Citations: 139 F. App'x 886
Docket Number: No. 03-17290
Parties: NOCERA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ASI ACQUISITION CORPORATION; Robert L. Cashman; Karen Fowler; Trade Leasing, Inc., Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: Before: SILVERMAN, WARDLAW, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 139
Pages: 886–886

Head Matter:
NOCERA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ASI ACQUISITION CORPORATION; Robert L. Cashman; Karen Fowler; Trade Leasing, Inc., Defendants-Appellants.
No. 03-17290.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted July 14, 2005.
Decided July 20, 2005.
William F. Kirk, Esq., Joshua L. Harmon, Harmon & Davies, Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Jonathan P. Leleu, Esq., L. J. Coppedge, Esq., Sheri Ann Forbes, Kummer Kaempfer Bonner & Renshaw, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendants-Appellants.
Before: SILVERMAN, WARDLAW, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Appellants ASI Acquisition Corporation, Robert L. Cashman, Karen Fowler and Trade Leasing, Inc. appeal the district court's order denying their emergency motion to set aside the default judgment entered against them. Our review of the record below leads us to the conclusion that the district court did not abuse its discretion when it denied appellants' motion, see Franchise Holding II, LLC v. Huntington Rests. Group, Inc., 375 F.3d 922, 927 n. 4 (9th Cir.2004), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 125 S.Ct. 1704, 161 L.Ed.2d 526 (2005); accordingly, we affirm the district court.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.