Case Name: EQR-LPC URBAN RENEWAL NORTH PIER, LLC and EQR-Lincoln Urban Renewal Jersey City, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY, Defendant-Respondent.
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 2017-11-15
Citations: 173 A.3d 184
Docket Number: A–16 Sept. Term 2016; 078268
Parties: EQR-LPC URBAN RENEWAL NORTH PIER, LLC and EQR-Lincoln Urban Renewal Jersey City, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CITY OF JERSEY CITY, Defendant-Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 173
Pages: 184–184

Head Matter:
EQR-LPC URBAN RENEWAL NORTH PIER, LLC and EQR-Lincoln Urban Renewal Jersey City, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CITY OF JERSEY CITY, Defendant-Respondent.
A-16 Sept. Term 2016
078268
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued October 11, 2017
Decided November 15, 2017
Craig M. White (Baker & Hostetler of the Illinois bar, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for appellant (Baker & Hostetler and K & L Gates, attorneys; Craig M. White, Anthony P. La Rocco and Benjamin I. Rubinstein, on the brief).
Jeremy A. Farrell and Philip S. Adelman argued the cause for respondent (Jeremy A. Farrell, Corporation Counsel, City of New Jersey, attorney; Mary Ann Murphy, Assistant Corporation counsel, on the brief).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
The judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the PER CURIAM opinion, reported at 452 N.J. Super. 309, 173 A. 3d 243 (App. Div. 2016).
CHIEF JUSTICE RABNER and JUSTICES LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, PATTERSON, FERNANDEZ-VINA, and SOLOMON join in this opinion. JUSTICE TIMPONE did not participate.