Case Name: In re Donald V. LABBRUZZO, Carlos Camarillo, and Plasticos Promex U.S.A., Inc.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 2006-08-10
Citations: 225 S.W.3d 634
Docket Number: No. 08-06-00210-CV
Parties: In re Donald V. LABBRUZZO, Carlos Camarillo, and Plasticos Promex U.S.A., Inc.
Judges: Before BARAJAS, C.J., McCLURE, and CHEW, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 225
Pages: 634–635

Head Matter:
In re Donald V. LABBRUZZO, Carlos Camarillo, and Plasticos Promex U.S.A., Inc.
No. 08-06-00210-CV.
Court of Appeals of Texas, El Paso.
Aug. 10, 2006.
Corey W. Haugland, James, Goldman & Haugland, P.C., Thomas E. Stanton, El Paso, for relators.
Steven L. Hughes, Mounce, Green, Myers, Safi & Galatzan, El Paso, for real party in interest.
Before BARAJAS, C.J., McCLURE, and CHEW, JJ.

Opinion:
OPINION ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Justice.
Relators, Donald V. Labbruzzo, Carlos Camarillo, and Plásticos Promex U.S.A., Inc., seek a writ of mandamus against the Honorable Luis Aguilar, Judge of the 120th District Court of El Paso County. Mandamus will lie only to correct a clear abuse of discretion. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 883, 840 (Tex.1992)(orig. proceeding). Moreover, there must be no other adequate remedy at law. Id. Based on the petition and record before us, we are unable to conclude that Relators are entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, we deny mandamus relief. See Tex.R.App.P. 52.8(a). Further, we deny Relators motion for emergency relief. See Tex.R.App.P. 52.10.