Case Name: ROSE DORNBUSCH ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF NEWARK, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1937-01-22
Citations: 117 N.J.L. 424
Docket Number: 
Parties: ROSE DORNBUSCH ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF NEWARK, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 117
Pages: 424–425

Head Matter:
ROSE DORNBUSCH ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF NEWARK, APPELLANT.
Argued October 23, 1936
Decided January 22, 1937.
For the respondents, Samuel Rosenthal.
For the appellant, Frank A. Boettner and Jules E. Tepper.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered b}^ Mr. Justice Bodine in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.