Case Name: Edward Lonnie MCCARROLL; Samuel C. Ross, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and Michael Lucas, Plaintiff, v. Theodis BECK; Juanita Baker; Offender Population Unified Systems, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-05-18
Citations: 96 F. App'x 901
Docket Number: No. 04-6061
Parties: Edward Lonnie MCCARROLL; Samuel C. Ross, Plaintiffs—Appellants, and Michael Lucas, Plaintiff, v. Theodis BECK; Juanita Baker; Offender Population Unified Systems, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 96
Pages: 901–902

Head Matter:
Edward Lonnie MCCARROLL; Samuel C. Ross, Plaintiffs—Appellants, and Michael Lucas, Plaintiff, v. Theodis BECK; Juanita Baker; Offender Population Unified Systems, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 04-6061.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 13, 2004.
Decided May 18, 2004.
Edward Lonnie McCarroll, Samuel C. Ross, Appellants pro se.
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished her curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Edward Lonnie McCarroll and Samuel C. Ross appeal the district court's order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See McCarroll v. Beck, No. CA-03-863-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 11, 2003). The court has also received twelve motions seeking to add a total of fifteen individuals who were not parties to this case in the district court as parties to this appeal. We deny these motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED