Case Name: RITTENHOUSE PLAZA INC. v. Joan LICHTMAN v. Marvin Levin, C.P.A., Mary Duden, Stanton Oswald, Esquire, William Lederer, E. Gerald Riesenbach, Esquire, Jon Sirlin, Esquire, Dana Plon, Esquire and Peter Lesser, Esquire Petition of Joan Lichtman
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2008-11-05
Citations: 598 Pa. 610
Docket Number: No. 126 EM 2008
Parties: RITTENHOUSE PLAZA INC. v. Joan LICHTMAN v. Marvin Levin, C.P.A., Mary Duden, Stanton Oswald, Esquire, William Lederer, E. Gerald Riesenbach, Esquire, Jon Sirlin, Esquire, Dana Plon, Esquire and Peter Lesser, Esquire Petition of Joan Lichtman.
Judges: 
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 598
Pages: 610–610

Head Matter:
959 A.2d 909
RITTENHOUSE PLAZA INC. v. Joan LICHTMAN v. Marvin Levin, C.P.A., Mary Duden, Stanton Oswald, Esquire, William Lederer, E. Gerald Riesenbach, Esquire, Jon Sirlin, Esquire, Dana Plon, Esquire and Peter Lesser, Esquire Petition of Joan Lichtman.
No. 126 EM 2008.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Nov. 5, 2008.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 5th day of November, 2008, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for Allowance of Appeal, treated as a Petition for Review, and the "Emergency Motion to Amend Supersedeas," which is treated as a Motion for Stay, are DENIED. Respondents' Motion to Consolidate is DISMISSED AS MOOT.