Case Name: In the Matter of Palma Mitchell et al., Appellants, v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Yonkers et al., Respondents, and Christian Burckel, Intervenor-Respondent. (And a Similar Proceeding.)
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1981-07-07
Citations: 54 N.Y.2d 727
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Palma Mitchell et al., Appellants, v Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Yonkers et al., Respondents, and Christian Burckel, Intervenor-Respondent. (And a Similar Proceeding.)
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 54
Pages: 727–729

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Palma Mitchell et al., Appellants, v Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Yonkers et al., Respondents, and Christian Burckel, Intervenor-Respondent. (And a Similar Proceeding.)
Decided July 7, 1981
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
John A. Mitchell and Thomas V. Incantalupo for appellants.
Arthur J. Doran, Jr., Corporation Counsel (Robert W. Villani of counsel), for respondents.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On summary consideration, order affirmed, with costs. We cannot say as a matter of law that the determination of the board of appeals to grant an area variance was either arbitrary, capricious or without a rational basis.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.