Case Name: Evanne Gardner, Appellant, v. Ervin E. Pereboom, Appellee
Court: Kansas Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Kansas
Decision Date: 1965-01-23
Citations: 194 Kan. 239
Docket Number: No. 43,909
Parties: Evanne Gardner, Appellant, v. Ervin E. Pereboom, Appellee.
Judges: Price, Fatzer and Schroeder JJ., dissent.
Reporter: Kansas Reports
Volume: 194
Pages: 239–239

Head Matter:
No. 43,909
Evanne Gardner, Appellant, v. Ervin E. Pereboom, Appellee.
(398 P. 2d 300)
Opinion filed January 23, 1965.
Russell Cranmer, of Wichita, argued the cause, and Gerald L. Michaud, Oroal L. Fisher and M. William Syrios, all of Wichita, were, with him on the briefs for the appellant.
Robert M. Siefkin, of Wichita, argued the cause, and D. M. Ward, of Peabody, George B. Powers, Carl T. Smith, John F. Eberhardt, Stuart R. Carter, Robert C. Foulston, Malcolm Miller, Robert N. Partridge, Richard C. Harris, Gerald Sawatzky, Donald L. Cordes, Robert L. Howard, Charles J. Woodin, Mikel L. Stout, Ronald K. Badger and Benjamin C. Langel, all of Wichita, were with him on the briefs for the appellee.

Opinion:
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hatcher, C.:
Evanne Gardner brought this action to recover damages for the loss of service and medical expense resulting from the injury to her 14 year old son in an automobile collision. Her claim for loss of services was later withdrawn. The case was consolidated with others and the trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for the defendant. The plaintiff has perfected this appeal challenging the order of consolidation and other rulings.
For all practical purposes the issue raised by this appeal is the same as the one involved and determined in Gardner v. Pereboom, 194 Kan. 231, 398 P. 2d 293, this day decided. Therefore based on what is said and held in that opinion the judgment in the instant case must be reversed with instructions to grant a separate trial.
It is so ordered.
APPROVED BY THE COURT.
Price, Fatzer and Schroeder JJ., dissent.