Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Angel RAYA-MENDOZA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-01-22
Citations: 264 F. App'x 660
Docket Number: No. 07-10246
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Angel RAYA-MENDOZA, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 264
Pages: 660–660

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Angel RAYA-MENDOZA, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 07-10246.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 14, 2008 .
Filed Jan. 22, 2008.
Joseph A. Fazioli, USSJ-Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Jose, CA, for PlaintiffAppellee.
Mark D. Eibert, Esq., Half Moon Bay, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: HALL, O’SCANNLAIN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Angel Raya-Mendoza appeals from the 70-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal re-entry following deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Raya-Mendoza contends that his sentence is unreasonable because he did not receive a larger downward adjustment for his relatively minor, non-violent criminal history. We disagree. The district court conducted a thorough analysis of the sentencing factors listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), and we conclude that Raya-Mendoza's sentence is not unreasonable. See Gall v. United States, — U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 586, 597-98, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.