Case Name: David A. GOLDSMITH, Appellant, v. Nick DEVITO, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-12-30
Citations: 609 So. 2d 785
Docket Number: No. 92-00879
Parties: David A. GOLDSMITH, Appellant, v. Nick DEVITO, Appellee.
Judges: FRANK, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 609
Pages: 785–785

Head Matter:
David A. GOLDSMITH, Appellant, v. Nick DEVITO, Appellee.
No. 92-00879.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Dec. 30, 1992.
John D. Goldsmith of Trenam, Simmons, Kemker, Scharf, Barkin, Frye & O’Neill, P.A., Tampa, for appellant.
Robert F. Salkowicz and Sean O. Cadigan of Nixon and Nixon, Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
David A. Goldsmith appeals a summary final judgment entered in an action on a promissory note. We reverse the summary judgment because the plaintiff, Nick De-vito, did not file sufficient affidavits to establish his claim or to overcome Goldsmith's affirmative defenses.
Reversed and remanded.
FRANK, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.