Case Name: In re Estate of Thomas V. Golden. Travelers Insurance Company, appellant, v. Martina G. Dishner, Administratrix, appellee
Court: Nebraska Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Nebraska
Decision Date: 1930-07-17
Citations: 120 Neb. 232
Docket Number: No. 27400
Parties: In re Estate of Thomas V. Golden. Travelers Insurance Company, appellant, v. Martina G. Dishner, Administratrix, appellee.
Judges: Heard before Goss, C. J., Rose, Dean, Good, Thompson, Eberly and Day, JJ.
Reporter: Nebraska Reports
Volume: 120
Pages: 232–235

Head Matter:
In re Estate of Thomas V. Golden. Travelers Insurance Company, appellant, v. Martina G. Dishner, Administratrix, appellee.
Filed July 17, 1930.
No. 27400.
J. D. Cronin and J. A. Donohoe, for appellant.
M. F. Harrington, Lewis Chapman and W. J. Hammond, contra.
Seymour S. Sidner, C. M. Skiles and Perry, Van Pelt & Marti, amici curise.
Heard before Goss, C. J., Rose, Dean, Good, Thompson, Eberly and Day, JJ.

Opinion:
Rose, J.
This is a controversy between the Travelers Insurance Company, claimant, and Martina G. Dishner, administra trix of the estate of Thomas V. Golden, deceased, over a contingent claim based on a plea for a deficiency judgment against the Golden estate in a pending action to foreclose a real estate mortgage executed by Golden in his lifetime to secure a note for $5,000. The time limited by the county court for the filing and barring of claims expired before the contingent claim was presented. On application of claimant the county court allowed the claim to be filed as a belated one, over objections of the administratrix. Later the claim was allowed as a contingent claim against the estate. Upon appeal to the district court it was held that the claim-was barred by the order of the county court pursuant to the nonclaim statute. From the judgment of the district court claimant appealed to the supreme court.
An examination of the record results in a finding that good cause for permission to file the claim- in the county court out of time was not shown for reasons stated in the opinion in the case of In re Estate of Golden, ante, p. 226, decided herewith.
Affirmed.