Case Name: CITY OF MIAMI, Appellant, v. Jose E. PERDOMO, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1994-11-16
Citations: 647 So. 2d 244
Docket Number: No. 94-134
Parties: CITY OF MIAMI, Appellant, v. Jose E. PERDOMO, Appellee.
Judges: KAHN, MICKLE and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 647
Pages: 244–244

Head Matter:
CITY OF MIAMI, Appellant, v. Jose E. PERDOMO, Appellee.
No. 94-134.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nov. 16, 1994.
A. Quinn Jones, III, City Atty., and Kathryn S. Pecko, Asst. City Atty., Miami, for appellant.
Karen K. Schroll, Miami, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In Barragan v. City of Miami 545 So.2d 252 (Fla.1989), the supreme court invalidated a Miami ordinance which authorized the city to reduce disability pension benefits for its retired employees in an amount equal to the retired employees' workers' compensation benefits. In the present ease, a claimant applied for additional benefits in an amount equal to the offset taken by the city pursuant to the invalid ordinance, for the period before the Barragan decision. The Judge of Compensation Claims awarded these additional benefits and the city appealed to this court. In the interim, however, the supreme court has held that Barragan is to be only prospectively applied. See City of Miami v. Bell, 634 So.2d 163 (Fla.1994). Accordingly, we REVERSE and REMAND with directions that an order be entered which is consistent with Bell.
KAHN, MICKLE and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.