Case Name: IN THE MATTER OF JOSÉ VICTOR BERNARDINO, A/K/A JOSEPH BERNARDINO, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 003341999)
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 2008-02-27
Citations: 193 N.J. 596
Docket Number: 
Parties: IN THE MATTER OF JOSÉ VICTOR BERNARDINO, A/K/A JOSEPH BERNARDINO, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 003341999).
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 193
Pages: 596–597

Head Matter:
941 A.2d 596
IN THE MATTER OF JOSÉ VICTOR BERNARDINO, A/K/A JOSEPH BERNARDINO, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 003341999).
February 27, 2008.

Opinion:
ORDER
The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 07-273, concluding that as a matter of reciprocal discipline pursuant to Rule 1:20-14. JOSÉ VICTOR BERNAR-DINO, a/k/a JOSEPH BERNARDINO of PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1999, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year based on discipline imposed in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania that in New Jersey violates RPC 8.4(c)(conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that JOSÉ VICTOR BERNARDINO, a/k/a JOSEPH BERNARDINO, is suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year and until the further Order of the Court, effective immediately; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys; and it is further
ORDERED that pursuant to Rule l:20-20(c), respondent's failure to comply with the Affidavit of Compliance requirement of Rule l:20-20(b)(15) may (1) preclude the Disciplinary Review Board from considering respondent's petition for reinstatement for a period of up to six months from the date respondent files proof of compliance; (2) be found to constitute a violation of RPC 8.1(b) and RPC 8.4(c); and (3) provide a basis for an action for contempt pursuant to Rule 1:10-2; and it is further
ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.