Case Name: Otis Akers v. The State
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1923-05-23
Citations: 94 Tex. Crim. 413
Docket Number: 
Parties: Otis Akers v. The State.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Criminal Reports
Volume: 94
Pages: 413–414

Head Matter:
Otis Akers v. The State.
May 23, 1923.
1. —Robbery—Judgment Affirmed.
In the absence of a statement of facts and bills of exception, the indictment and proceedings thereon being regular, the judgment is affirmed.
2. —Same—Rehearing—Certiorari—Rule Stated.
Where the procedure pointed out in the statute with reference to the pauper’s affidavit or a statement of facts had not been followed, this court will refuse to order the court stenographer to prepare such statement, and the writ of certiorari is denied. Following Akers v. State, 249 S. W. Rep., 848.
Appeal from the Criminal District Court of Dallas. Tried below before the Honorable C. A. Pippin.
Appeal from a conviction of robbery; penalty, seven years in the penitentiary.
Opinion states the case.
Otis Akers, for the appellant.
R. G. Storey, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Opinion:
MORROW, Presiding Judge.
The offense is robbery; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of seven years. The indictment is regular; no facts are brought up for review, and no rulings of the trial court are brought forward for revisions by bill of exceptions.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.