Case Name: In re: Dennis MILLER, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-11-28
Citations: 490 F. App'x 589
Docket Number: No. 12-2356
Parties: In re: Dennis MILLER, Petitioner.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 490
Pages: 589–590

Head Matter:
In re: Dennis MILLER, Petitioner.
No. 12-2356.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 14, 2012.
Decided: Nov. 28, 2012.
Dennis Miller, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Dennis Miller petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in scheduling a resen-tencing hearing following its grant of relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2012). He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pau- peris and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.