Case Name: Ambrosio Castro Rodríguez, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Braulio García Rodríguez, Defendant and Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Puerto Rico
Jurisdiction: Puerto Rico
Decision Date: 1963-10-01
Citations: 89 P.R. 140
Docket Number: No. R-63-12
Parties: Ambrosio Castro Rodríguez, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Braulio García Rodríguez, Defendant and Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Puerto Rico Reports
Volume: 89
Pages: 140–141

Head Matter:
Ambrosio Castro Rodríguez, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Braulio García Rodríguez, Defendant and Appellant.
No. R-63-12.
Decided October 1, 1963.
Rafael L. Franco Garcia for appellant. Faustino R. Aponte for appellee.
Division composed of Mr. Chief Justice Negrón Fernández, Mr. Justice Blanco Lugo, and Mr. Justice Ramírez Bages.

Opinion:
JUDGMENT
It appearing from the original record of this ease that the judgment therein was rendered by the trial court on June 15, 1962; that the same was filed in record and served on the parties the same day; that on June 25, 1962, appellant filed a motion for reconsideration of the judgment, and that, on motion filed by said appellant on July 11 of that year, the motion for reconsideration was set for hearing on the following August 17, and on that date, after hearing the appellee, the trial court denied the said motion; that at appellant's request that court again set the said motion for hearing on September 14, 1962, when it was argued by the attorneys for the parties; that on November 23, 1962, the trial court granted 10 days to appellant to file the stenographic record of the hearings of the case on the merits; that on January 2, 1963, the trial court denied the said motion for reconsideration and reiterated its judgment of the 14th of that month; that on January 17, 1963, appellant filed in this Court the petition for review in this case; and
In view of the provisions of Rule 47 of the Rules of Civil Procedure and the holding of this Court in Franceschi v. Municipality of Juana Diaz, 88 P.R.R. 377 (1963), the petition for review in this case is denied for want of jurisdiction. '
It was so decreed and ordered by the Court as witnesses the signature of the Chief Justice.
(s) Luis Negrón Fernández Chief Justice
I attest:
(s) Ignacio Rivera
General Secretary