Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. CHARLES LeROY SEYMOUR, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1971-01-18
Citations: 4 Or. App. 461
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. CHARLES LeROY SEYMOUR, Appellant.
Judges: Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Langtry and Fort, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 4
Pages: 461–461

Head Matter:
Argued January 18,
affirmed January 18,
petition for rehearing denied February 5,
petition for review denied March 9,1971'
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. CHARLES LeROY SEYMOUR, Appellant.
479 P2d 246
Ken C. Hadley, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.
Jacob B. Tanzer, Solicitor General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Lee Johnson, Attorney General, Salem.
Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Langtry and Fort, Judges.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM DECISION
This appeal presented no unusual or difficult questions. Having previously studied the briefs, immediately upon conclusion of argument, and after briefly stating to counsel our reasons, we ruled from the bench. Setting forth those reasons in a detailed opinion would add nothing of value to the existing body of judicial precedent. Our ruling was:
Affirmed.