Case Name: Daniel C. LAGERGREN, Relator, v. CENTERPOINT ENERGY/MINNEGASCO, and Travelers/Constitution State Services Company, Respondents, and Life Insurance Company of North America, Central Minnesota Neurosciences, Center for Pain Management, St. Cloud Neurobehavioral Associates, NW Industrial Rehabilitation Services, Inc., Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Texas, and Minneapolis Clinic of Neurology, Intervenors
Court: Minnesota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Minnesota
Decision Date: 2008-11-04
Citations: 757 N.W.2d 181
Docket Number: No. A08-1362
Parties: Daniel C. LAGERGREN, Relator, v. CENTERPOINT ENERGY/MINNEGASCO, and Travelers/Constitution State Services Company, Respondents, and Life Insurance Company of North America, Central Minnesota Neurosciences, Center for Pain Management, St. Cloud Neurobehavioral Associates, NW Industrial Rehabilitation Services, Inc., Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Texas, and Minneapolis Clinic of Neurology, Intervenors.
Judges: 
Reporter: North Western Reporter 2d
Volume: 757
Pages: 181–181

Head Matter:
Daniel C. LAGERGREN, Relator, v. CENTERPOINT ENERGY/MINNEGASCO, and Travelers/Constitution State Services Company, Respondents, and Life Insurance Company of North America, Central Minnesota Neurosciences, Center for Pain Management, St. Cloud Neurobehavioral Associates, NW Industrial Rehabilitation Services, Inc., Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Texas, and Minneapolis Clinic of Neurology, Intervenors.
No. A08-1362.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
Nov. 4, 2008.
Deanna M. McCashin, Schoep & McCashin, Chartered, Alexandria, MN, for relator.
Thomas P. Kieselbach, Cousineau McGuire Chartered, Minneapolis, MN, for respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed July 15, 2008, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that "[sjummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view," doing no more than establishing the law of the case).
BY THE COURT:
/s/Paul H. Anderson Associate Justice