Case Name: NORTHEASTERN FLORIDA CHAPTER OF the ASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF AMERICA, a Florida Corporation not for profit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA, a Florida Municipal Corp., Tommy Hazouri, in his official capacity as Mayor of the City of Jacksonville, Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1993-08-09
Citations: 997 F.2d 835
Docket Number: No. 90-3495
Parties: NORTHEASTERN FLORIDA CHAPTER OF the ASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF AMERICA, a Florida Corporation not for profit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA, a Florida Municipal Corp., Tommy Hazouri, in his official capacity as Mayor of the City of Jacksonville, Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, BIRCH, Circuit Judge, and GODBOLD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 997
Pages: 835–835

Head Matter:
NORTHEASTERN FLORIDA CHAPTER OF the ASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF AMERICA, a Florida Corporation not for profit, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA, a Florida Municipal Corp., Tommy Hazouri, in his official capacity as Mayor of the City of Jacksonville, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 90-3495.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Aug. 9, 1993.
James L. Harrison, City of Jacksonville, Gen. Counsel, Steven E. Rohan and Leonard S. Magid, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Jacksonville, FL, for defendants-appellants.
Robert L. Barr, G. Stephen Parker, Deborah A Ausburn, Atlanta, GA and John W. Caven, Jr., Jacksonville, FL, for plaintiff-appellee.

Opinion:
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, BIRCH, Circuit Judge, and GODBOLD, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
This ease is remanded to the district court for it to reconsider the case in the light of the decision of the Supreme Court in Northeastern Florida Chapter of the Associated General Contractors of America v. City of Jacksonville, - U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 2297, 124 L.Ed.2d 586 (1993). The court should permit plaintiff to amend its complaint to raise the validity of the second ordinance, if it wishes to do so. Church of Scientology F.S.O. v. City of Clearwater, 777 F.2d 598 (11th Cir.1985).