Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesus R. ESTRADA, aka Chuy, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-08-04
Citations: 141 F. App'x 616
Docket Number: No. 03-10528
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesus R. ESTRADA, aka Chuy, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 141
Pages: 616–616

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesus R. ESTRADA, aka Chuy, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 03-10528.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 1, 2005.
Decided Aug. 4, 2005.
John M. Gillies, Esq., Pamela A. Martin, USLV — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Jason F. Carr, Esq., FPDNV — Federal Public Defender’s Office, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.
Jesus R. Estrada, Calexico, CA, pro se.
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CALLAHAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Jesus R. Estrada appeals the 120-month sentence imposed after pleading guilty to conspiracy for possession with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
We dismiss in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2000) (stating that an appeal waiver is valid when it is entered into knowingly and voluntarily); see also United States v. Cardenas, 405 F.3d 1046, 1048 (9th Cir.2005) (holding that the changes in sentencing law imposed by United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), did not render waiver of appeal involuntary and unknowing).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.