Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerome Frederick SATTERFIELD, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-08-23
Citations: 443 F. App'x 817
Docket Number: No. 11-6807
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerome Frederick SATTERFIELD, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 443
Pages: 817–818

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerome Frederick SATTERFIELD, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-6807.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 18, 2011.
Decided: Aug. 23, 2011.
Jerome Frederick Satterfield, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jerome Frederick Satterfield appeals from the district court's order granting his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), and reducing his sentence from 190 months to 152 months. He contends that the court should have also ordered that his sentence run concurrent to his undischarged state sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion. The district court was without authority to modify that portion of the sentence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006); see also, Dillon v. United States, — U.S. —, 130 S.Ct. 2683, 2694, 177 L.Ed.2d 271 (2010). We therefore affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.