Case Name: SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Garland B. STAFFORD, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1966-09-28
Citations: 190 So. 2d 339
Docket Number: No. 34850
Parties: SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Garland B. STAFFORD, Respondent.
Judges: THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, DREW, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 190
Pages: 339–339

Head Matter:
SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Garland B. STAFFORD, Respondent.
No. 34850.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Sept. 28, 1966.
Rehearing Denied Oct. 20, 1966.
Stewart, Van der Hulse & Call, West Palm Beach, for petitioner.
Farish & Farish, West Palm Beach, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
After careful consideration of the record and briefs in this case in the light of the argument of counsel, we conclude that no such conflict has been demonstrated as justifies the exercise of jurisdiction by this court.
The writ issued herein is discharged.
THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, DREW, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.