Case Name: INTERSTATE PROTECTIVE SERVICE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-05-06
Citations: 326 F. App'x 517
Docket Number: No. 08-15413
Parties: INTERSTATE PROTECTIVE SERVICE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before BLACK, CARNES and WILSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 326
Pages: 517–517

Head Matter:
INTERSTATE PROTECTIVE SERVICE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 08-15413
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
May 6, 2009.
Derrick Lee Bingham, Charles J. Cole, J. Pargen Robertson, Jr., Owen, Gleaton, Egan, Jones & Sweeney, LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Andrew D. Horowitz, Drew Eckl & Farnham, LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before BLACK, CARNES and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Interstate Protective Service, Inc. (IPS), appeals from the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Nautilus Insurance Company (Nautilus) and denial of IPS's motion for partial summary judgment. Specifically, IPS argues the district court erred in finding its commercial liability insurance policy, issued by Nautilus, excluded coverage for damages arising from a January 2003 robbery of a money center that was guarded by IPS.
After a de novo review of the record and consideration of the parties' briefs, we conclude the district court did not err in its grant of summary judgment to Nautilus and denial of IPS's motion for partial summary judgment. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.