Case Name: Fred HAYWOOD Petitioner-Appellant v. C.V. RIVERA, Warden, FCI-Forrest City Medium Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-01-30
Citations: 674 F. App'x 596
Docket Number: No. 16-2615
Parties: Fred HAYWOOD Petitioner-Appellant v. C.V. RIVERA, Warden, FCI-Forrest City Medium Respondent-Appellee
Judges: Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 674
Pages: 596–597

Head Matter:
Fred HAYWOOD Petitioner-Appellant v. C.V. RIVERA, Warden, FCI-Forrest City Medium Respondent-Appellee
No. 16-2615
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: January 30, 2017
Filed: January 30, 2017
Fred Haywood, Pro Se
Stacey E. McCord, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR, for Respondent-Appellee
Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Federal inmate Fred Haywood appeals the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. Upon careful de novo review, see Flowers v. Anderson, 661 F.3d 977, 980 (8th Cir. 2011), we conclude the action was properly dismissed for the reasons stated in the district court's order. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable J. Thomas Ray, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).