Case Name: VINCENT J. DE SALVIO, RESPONDENT, v. LUCY BARBATO RAFFONE, ADMINISTRATRIX, ETC., APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1929-10-14
Citations: 106 N.J.L. 236
Docket Number: 
Parties: VINCENT J. DE SALVIO, RESPONDENT, v. LUCY BARBATO RAFFONE, ADMINISTRATRIX, ETC., APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 106
Pages: 236–237

Head Matter:
VINCENT J. DE SALVIO, RESPONDENT, v. LUCY BARBATO RAFFONE, ADMINISTRATRIX, ETC., APPELLANT.
Submitted May 31, 1929
Decided October 14, 1929.
For the respondent, Meyer Q. Kessel.
For the appellant, Charles C. Giffoniello.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Kalisch, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, White, Yan Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.