Case Name: M. FISK, Respondent, v. THE N. P. R. R. CO., Appellant
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1890-04-23
Citations: 19 Or. 163
Docket Number: 
Parties: M. FISK, Respondent, v. THE N. P. R. R. CO., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 19
Pages: 163–163

Head Matter:
[Filed April 23, 1890.
M. FISK, Respondent, v. THE N. P. R. R. CO., Appellant.
Appeal from Columbia county: F. J. Taylok, judge.
Dolph, Bellinger, Mallory & Siw.on, for Appellant.
R. & E. B. Williams and Sears & Beach, for Respondent.
Moses v. S.P.R. R. Co., 18 Or. 385, approved and followed.

Opinion:
Pee Oueiam.
The court below held in this case that the railway company was required under the statute to fence its depot. .
In a recent case—Moses v. S. P. R. R. Co., 18 Or. 385,—we held otherwise, and the reasons therein stated render it unnecessary to further consider that question.
The judgment must be reversed and a new trial ordered.