Case Name: Bilal MAHMUD, Plaintiff-Appellant, Khadijah Mahmud, Plaintiff, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et. al., Defendants, Justin P. Oberman, individually and in his official capacity as Director, Credentialing Program Office, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-01-16
Citations: 262 F. App'x 935
Docket Number: No. 07-13311
Parties: Bilal MAHMUD, Plaintiff-Appellant, Khadijah Mahmud, Plaintiff, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et. al., Defendants, Justin P. Oberman, individually and in his official capacity as Director, Credentialing Program Office, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before CARNES, PRYOR and HILL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 262
Pages: 935–936

Head Matter:
Bilal MAHMUD, Plaintiff-Appellant, Khadijah Mahmud, Plaintiff, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et. al., Defendants, Justin P. Oberman, individually and in his official capacity as Director, Credentialing Program Office, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 07-13311
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Jan. 16, 2008.
Stephen Michael Katz, Law Offices of Stephen M. Katz, Marietta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Andrew D. Silverman, Mary H. Mason, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before CARNES, PRYOR and HILL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Plaintiff-appellant Bilal Mahmud appeals the dismissal of his action. The judgment of the district court was accompanied by a full published opinion, Mahmud v. Ober man, 508 F.Supp.2d 1294 (2007). In his complaint, Mahmud asserted claims which he sought to establish under the Bivens v. Six Unknomi Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics doctrine, 403 U.S. 388, 397, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), based upon the suspension or revocation of the Hazardous Materials Endorsement on his commercial drivers license. Based on the facts of this case, the district court held that a Bivens remedy for damages was not available to Mahmud, and, furthermore, Mahmud had not met his burden of establishing that due process is satisfied by the exercise of personal jurisdiction over defendant-appellee Justin P. Oberman. It granted Oberman's motion to dismiss for both reasons.
Having carefully considered the judgment and opinion of the district court, the briefs of the parties, and the record, and finding no reversible error, the judgment is AFFIRMED.