Case Name: James JONES a/k/a Otis Wallace, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2001-12-12
Citations: 802 So. 2d 440
Docket Number: No. 3D01-3005
Parties: James JONES a/k/a Otis Wallace, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 802
Pages: 440–441

Head Matter:
James JONES a/k/a Otis Wallace, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D01-3005.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 12, 2001.
James Jones, in proper person.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
James Jones appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. We affirm.
Defendant-appellant Jones filed a motion for postconviction relief, contending that his federal sentence had been enhanced on account of the defendant's guilty pleas in 1981 and 1990 to Miami-Dade County Circuit Court case numbers 81-8748, 89-41604, and 90-28661. Defendant argued, among other things, that he was not advised, at the time of his pleas, that these convictions could be used to enhance his sentence in the future if he committed another crime. The trial court denied defendant's motion on the merits, and defendant has appealed.
We entirely agree with the trial court's analysis of the merits. Major v. State, 790 So.2d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001), review granted, 797 So.2d 586 (Fla.2001). We affirm the denial of relief in addition because the motion is untimely. The two-year window created by Wood v. State, 750 So.2d 592 (Fla.1999), ran from May 27, 1999 to May 27, 2001. Id. at 595; Bismark v. State, 796 So.2d 584, 586, n. 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). Defendant's motion is dated August 6, 2001.
Affirmed.