Case Name: WILMAR, INCORPORATED v. HENRY M. ANDERSON, JR.
Court: North Carolina Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 1971-12-15
Citations: 13 N.C. App. 80
Docket Number: No. 7126SC621
Parties: WILMAR, INCORPORATED v. HENRY M. ANDERSON, JR.
Judges: Judges Britt and Parker concur.
Reporter: North Carolina Court of Appeals Reports
Volume: 13
Pages: 80–80

Head Matter:
WILMAR, INCORPORATED v. HENRY M. ANDERSON, JR.
No. 7126SC621
(Filed 15 December 1971)
Appeal by defendant from Fountain, Judge, 10 May 1971 Session, Mecklenburg Superior Court.
This is an action seeking to enforce by injunction a covenant not to compete entered into between defendant as employee and plaintiff as employer.
Grier, Parker, Poe, Thompson, Bernstein, Gage and Preston, by Mark R. Bernstein, Sydnor Thompson and W. Samuel Woodard, for plaintiff appellee.
McElwee and Hall, by John E. Hall, and W. G. Mitchell for defendant appellant.

Opinion:
MORRIS, Judge.
The questions raised by this appeal are identical to those raised in Wilmar, Incorporated v. Liles and Wilmar, Incorporated v. Polk, 13 N.C. App. 71 (1971). The facts vary only in the type of employment defendant had with plaintiff and the type of employment with plaintiff's competitor. This variance in facts is of no significance in the application of the principles of law discussed in Wilmar, Incorporated v. Liles and Wilmar, Incorporated v. Polk, supra. The principles are equally applicable here.
For the reasons stated in Wilmar, Incorporated v. Liles and Wilmar, Incorporated v. Polk, the judgment of the trial tribunal must be
Reversed.
Judges Britt and Parker concur.