Case Name: Frederick Storck, Respondent v. The Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company, et al., Appellants
Court: New York Superior Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1891-05-04
Citations: 27 Jones & S. 588
Docket Number: 
Parties: Frederick Storck, Respondent v. The Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company, et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Reports of cases argued and determined in the Superior Court of the city of New York
Volume: 59
Pages: 588–588

Head Matter:
Frederick Storck, Respondent v. The Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company, et al., Appellants.
Decided May 4, 1891.
Appeal by defendants from judgment entered upon findings and conclusions at special term.
Julien T. Davies and Brainard Tolles, for appellants.
Sackett & Bennett, attorneys, and Charles Gibson Bennett of counsel, for respondent.
Before Sedgwick, Ch. J., and Dugro, J.

Opinion:
The question involved was as to the sufficiency of the evidence to require the" trial judge to find certain requests. The Court (per Curiam) held it insufficient and affirmed the judgment, with costs..