Case Name: Charles E. Dornbush, Respondent, v. J. Henry Yookel, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1899-10
Citations: 29 Misc. 743
Docket Number: 
Parties: Charles E. Dornbush, Respondent, v. J. Henry Yookel, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 29
Pages: 743–743

Head Matter:
Charles E. Dornbush, Respondent, v. J. Henry Yookel, Appellant.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff in the Municipal Court, tenth district, borough of Manhattan.
Albert J. Wise, for appellant.
Samuel Lilienthal, for respondent.

Opinion:
Freedman, P. J.
This action was brought to recover the sum of $147.75, as the value of extra labor done and materials furnished the defendant in excavating upon certain premises in the city.
Ho objections were made and no exceptions taken to the introduction of the testimony upon the trial. The case presents a conflict of evidence upon a question of fact, and as there is ample proof to sustain the judgment, and it not appearing that injustice has been done, the judgment must be affirmed.
MaoLean and Leventritt, JJ., concur.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.