Case Name: Wister KING, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles J. STRAUSS, Judge; R. Bryan Haskins, Attorney for the Commonwealth, Esq., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-03-19
Citations: 469 F. App'x 268
Docket Number: No. 11-7483
Parties: Wister KING, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles J. STRAUSS, Judge; R. Bryan Haskins, Attorney for the Commonwealth, Esq., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 469
Pages: 268–269

Head Matter:
Wister KING, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles J. STRAUSS, Judge; R. Bryan Haskins, Attorney for the Commonwealth, Esq., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 11-7483.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 15, 2012.
Decided: March 19, 2012.
Wister King, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Wister King, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny King's motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. King v. Strauss, No. 1:11-cv-01041-GBL-JFA (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 17, 2011; entered Oct. 20, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.