Case Name: Mary Kiley, an Infant, etc., Respondent, v. James Weir and Another, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1932-12
Citations: 237 A.D. 868
Docket Number: 
Parties: Mary Kiley, an Infant, etc., Respondent, v. James Weir and Another, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 237
Pages: 868–868

Head Matter:
Mary Kiley, an Infant, etc., Respondent, v. James Weir and Another, Appellants.

Opinion:
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Crosby, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law and for a dismissal of the complaint on the ground that this case differs from Nelson v. Nygren (259 N. Y. 71), in that the evidence is entirely undisputed that the plaintiff acquiesced and actively participated in the negligent operation of the car, of which she complains.