Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francisco ROMERO-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-07-24
Citations: 190 F. App'x 581
Docket Number: No. 03-50438
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Francisco ROMERO-GARCIA, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: B. FLETCHER, TROTT and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 190
Pages: 581–581

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Francisco ROMERO-GARCIA, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 03-50438.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 15, 2006.
Filed July 24, 2006.
U.S. Attorney, Virginia Black, USSD— Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Nancy G. Kendall, Esq., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: B. FLETCHER, TROTT and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Francisco Romero-Garcia appeals from the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for one count of making false statements to a federal officer, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
We reject Romero-Garcia's contention that the supervised release statute is unconstitutional. See United States v. Huerta-Pimental, 445 F.3d 1220 (9th Cir.2006).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.