Case Name: Carthell ROBERTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-01-24
Citations: 25 F. App'x 663
Docket Number: No. 01-15464. D.C. No. CV-00-01771 GEB(GGH)
Parties: Carthell ROBERTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 25
Pages: 663–664

Head Matter:
Carthell ROBERTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 01-15464. D.C. No. CV-00-01771 GEB(GGH).
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 14, 2002 .
Decided Jan. 24, 2002.
Before KLEINFELD, HAWKINS, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Carthell Roberts, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that the defendants violated his constitutional rights by denying him parole. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, and affirm. See Butterfield v. Bail, 120 F.3d 1023, 1024-25 (9th Cir.1997) (holding that a prisoner's challenge to parole proceedings must be brought as a petition for writ of habeas corpus, and not as a section 1983 action).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.