Case Name: Becker v. Emerson-Brantingham Implement Company
Court: Colorado Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Colorado
Decision Date: 1918-04
Citations: 65 Colo. 156
Docket Number: No. 9399
Parties: Becker v. Emerson-Brantingham Implement Company.
Judges: 
Reporter: Colorado Reports
Volume: 65
Pages: 156–156

Head Matter:
No. 9399.
Becker v. Emerson-Brantingham Implement Company.
Error to Logan District Court.
Hon. H. P. Burke, Judge.
Messrs. McConley & McConley, for plaintiff in Error.
Mr. Frank L. Grant, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
Opinion
per curiam.
This action was brought by the plaintiff in, error in the district court of Logan county to have set aside and held for naught, a judgment rendered against him in the district court of the City and County of Denver, upon a promissory note and to recover $3,000.00, alleged damages growing out of the transaction in which the note was given. Upon trial to the court, the action was dismissed at the cost of the defendant.
Perceiving no prejudicial error, the application for supersedeas will be denied and the judgment affirmed.
Supersedeas denied: Judgment affirmed.
Department three.