Case Name: PELICAN CREAMERY, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. TEXAS & NEW ORLEANS RAILROAD COMPANY et al., Defendants and Appellants
Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1961-12-21
Citations: 136 So. 2d 131
Docket Number: No. 388
Parties: PELICAN CREAMERY, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. TEXAS & NEW ORLEANS RAILROAD COMPANY et al., Defendants and Appellants.
Judges: Before FRUGÉ, CULPEPPER and HOOD, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 136
Pages: 131–131

Head Matter:
PELICAN CREAMERY, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. TEXAS & NEW ORLEANS RAILROAD COMPANY et al., Defendants and Appellants.
No. 388.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Third Circuit.
Dec. 21, 1961.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 15, 1962.
Certiorari Denied Feb. 19, 1962.
Davidson, Meaux, Onebane & Donohoe, by J. J. Davidson, Jr., Lafayette, for defendants-appellants.
Warren M. Simon and Thomas C. Wicker, Jr., by Warren M. Simon, New Orleans, for plaintiffs-appellees.
Before FRUGÉ, CULPEPPER and HOOD, JJ.

Opinion:
HOOD, Judge.
This is a companion case to suits entitled Marie Ruby Richard Begnaud et al. v. Texas and New Orleans Railroad Company et al., 136 So.2d 123, and Hypolite (Polite) Sonnier et al. v. Texas & New Orleans Railroad Company et al., 136 So.2d 130, all of which cases were consolidated for the purposes of trial and appeal.
The facts and the issues presented in this case were fully set forth and discussed in-the opinion which is being rendered today in the Begnaud case. For the reasons set out in that opinion, therefore, the judgment of the district court in the instant suit is affirmed. All costs of this appeal are assessed to defendants-appellants.
Affirmed.
On Application for Rehearing.
En Banc. Rehearing denied.