Case Name: Clarence HAYWOOD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Betty B. FLETCHER, 9th Circuit Court Judge; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-03-29
Citations: 175 F. App'x 815
Docket Number: No. 05-56227
Parties: Clarence HAYWOOD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Betty B. FLETCHER, 9th Circuit Court Judge; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before: CANBY, BEEZER, and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 175
Pages: 815–815

Head Matter:
Clarence HAYWOOD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Betty B. FLETCHER, 9th Circuit Court Judge; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
No. 05-56227.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 8, 2006.
Filed March 29, 2006.
Clarence Haywood, San Bernardino, CA, pro se.
Leon W. Weidman, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney Civil & Tax Divisions, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: CANBY, BEEZER, and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Clarence Haywood, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court's order striking his complaint pursuant to a vexatious litigant order. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the application of a vexatious litigant order for an abuse of discretion. See Moy v. United States, 906 F.2d 467, 469 (9th Cir.1990). We affirm.
In a prior appeal in Haywood v. Hillman, case no. 04-55468, this court affirmed the district court's imposition of a vexatious litigant order barring Haywood from filing further actions based on judicial officers' conspiracy to uphold his criminal conviction. The allegations in Haywood's complaint clearly involve the type of allegations for which the vexatious litigant order had been issued. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order striking his complaint pursuant to that vexatious litigant order.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.