Case Name: Norman BANKS, Appellant, v. AMERENUE, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-02-14
Citations: 25 F. App'x 483
Docket Number: No. 01-3331
Parties: Norman BANKS, Appellant, v. AMERENUE, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 25
Pages: 483–483

Head Matter:
Norman BANKS, Appellant, v. AMERENUE, Appellee.
No. 01-3331.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 7, 2002.
Filed: Feb. 14, 2002.
Before LOKEN, BEAM, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Norman Banks brought this action against AmerenUE, his former employer, claiming he was denied a promotion and was harassed because of his race and age, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq., and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 632, et seq. The district court denied Banks's post-discovery motion to amend his complaint to include claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1981, and granted AmerenUE summary judgment. Banks appeals. After careful review of the record, we affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Banks's belated motion to amend to include claims which he could have raised earlier, and which would have required additional discovery. See Bell v. Allstate Life Ins. Co., 160 F.3d 452, 454-55 (8th Cir.1998). We further conclude that Banks failed to establish a prima facie case of age or race discrimination because he did not show he was qualified for the promotion, see Dotson v. Delta Consol. Indus., Inc., 251 F.3d 780, 781 (8th Cir.2001); and that he did not show the alleged harassment was severe and pervasive or based upon his race or age, see Bradley v. Widnall, 232 F.3d 626, 631-32 (8th Cir.2000).
Accordingly, we affirm.
. The HONORABLE JEAN C. HAMILTON, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.