Case Name: David CHAMBERS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-07-16
Citations: 582 So. 2d 170
Docket Number: No. 91-433
Parties: David CHAMBERS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and GERSTEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 582
Pages: 170–170

Head Matter:
David CHAMBERS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 91-433.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 16, 1991.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Rosa C. Figarola, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Marc E. Brandes, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and GERSTEN, JJ.

Opinion:
CONFESSION OF ERROR
Appellant, David Chambers, appeals an order placing appellant on probation and requiring the payment of restitution as a condition of probation.
Appellant contends, and the State concedes, that portions of the probation order must be stricken because they impermissi-bly delegate the manner of payment of the restitution to be determined by the probation officer. See Milloway v. State, 567 So.2d 1073 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Williams v. State, 556 So.2d 799 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).
Accordingly, we reverse and remand appellant's sentence with directions that those portions of the probation order which delegate the manner of payment of restitution be stricken.
Reversed and remanded.