Case Name: J. E. McLEAN, J. E. McLean, Jr., and J. E. McLean, III, co-partners, trading and doing business as J. E. McLean & Sons, Appellants, v. PLANT FRUIT COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1964-09-23
Citations: 167 So. 2d 332
Docket Number: No. 5312
Parties: J. E. McLEAN, J. E. McLean, Jr., and J. E. McLean, III, co-partners, trading and doing business as J. E. McLean & Sons, Appellants, v. PLANT FRUIT COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Appellee.
Judges: SMITH, C. J., and ALLEN and ANDREWS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 167
Pages: 332–333

Head Matter:
J. E. McLEAN, J. E. McLean, Jr., and J. E. McLean, III, co-partners, trading and doing business as J. E. McLean & Sons, Appellants, v. PLANT FRUIT COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Appellee.
No. 5312.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.
Sept. 23, 1964.
John W. Boult, of Shackleford, Farrior, Stallings, Glos & Evans, Tampa, for appellants.
Marvin E. Barkin, of Fowler, White, Gillen, Humkey & Trenam, Tampa, for ap-pellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This matter is before the Court on the Motion of the appellee to dismiss.
After the filing of an amended complaint at law for damages for breach of contract, answer and counterclaim were filed. The Court entered a summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint, but left pending the counterclaim. Under such circumstances the judgment dismissing the complaint is a partial summary judgment and therefore interlocutory, and not appeal-able within the meaning of Florida Statutes, § 59.2(1), F.S.A. and Florida Appellate Rule 3.2, subd. b, 31 F.S.A.
Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is granted.
SMITH, C. J., and ALLEN and ANDREWS, JJ., concur.