Case Name: Howard W. Sneck, Respondent, v. Sol S. Loeb, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1923-03
Citations: 206 A.D. 649
Docket Number: 
Parties: Howard W. Sneck, Respondent, v. Sol S. Loeb, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 206
Pages: 649–650

Head Matter:
Howard W. Sneck, Respondent, v. Sol S. Loeb, Appellant.

Opinion:
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur; Davis, J., not sitting. Even though there might have been a technical error in the admission of evidence, the verdict shows that the defendant was allowed the counterclaim and it, therefore, does not constitute a reversible error.