Case Name: William J. DROEGE, D.C., Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Thomas D. NORMAN, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2008-03-18
Citations: 247 S.W.3d 606
Docket Number: No. ED 88821
Parties: William J. DROEGE, D.C., Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Thomas D. NORMAN, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before BOOKER T. SHAW, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J. and KURT S. ODENWALD, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 247
Pages: 606–606

Head Matter:
William J. DROEGE, D.C., Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Thomas D. NORMAN, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 88821.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
March 18, 2008.
Thomas D. Norman, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Kurt Joseph Dolan, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.
Before BOOKER T. SHAW, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J. and KURT S. ODENWALD, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant Thomas D. Norman appeals the trial court's judgment in favor of Respondent William J. Droege awarding $4,847.62 in damages and interest on the parties' contract for chiropractic services. We have reviewed the briefs and the record, and we conclude that the trial court did not err. No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).