Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Arturo HERNANDEZ-DEL ANGEL, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-12-15
Citations: 624 F. App'x 302
Docket Number: No. 15-40056
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Arturo HERNANDEZ-DEL ANGEL, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before JONES, SOUTHWICK, and COSTA Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 624
Pages: 302–303

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Arturo HERNANDEZ-DEL ANGEL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-40056
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 15, 2015.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Timothy William Crooks, Laura Fletcher Leavitt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before JONES, SOUTHWICK, and COSTA Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Arturo HernandezADel Angel has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Hernandez-Del Angel has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Hernandez-Del Angel's response. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no non-frivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Hernandez-Del Angel's motion for appointment of new appellate counsel is DENIED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.