Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Charles WYSINGER, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-10-05
Citations: 145 S.W.3d 856
Docket Number: No. ED 82825
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Charles WYSINGER, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 145
Pages: 856–857

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Charles WYSINGER, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 82825.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Oct. 5, 2004.
Jo Ann Rotermund, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Deborah Daniels, Andrea Mazza Follett, co-counsel, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Charles Wysinger appeals from the trial court's judgment entered upon his convictions of trafficking in the second degree, Section 195.233; possession of a con trolled substance, Section 195.202; and failure to appear, Section 544.665. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the judgment was supported by sufficient evidence and the trial court did not commit plain error in advising the jury to continue its deliberation. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).
. All statutory references are to RSMo 2000, unless otherwise indicated.