Case Name: In re: Kelvin Andre SPOTTS, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-08-28
Citations: 196 F. App'x 153
Docket Number: No. 06-6989
Parties: In re: Kelvin Andre SPOTTS, Petitioner.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 196
Pages: 153–153

Head Matter:
In re: Kelvin Andre SPOTTS, Petitioner.
No. 06-6989.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 17, 2006.
Decided: Aug. 28, 2006.
Kelvin Andre Spotts, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Kelvin Andre Spotts filed a petition for writ of mandamus alleging undue delay by the district court in directing a response from the United States to Spotts' 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The district court issued its final order in the case on May 24, 2006. Accordingly, the mandamus petition is now moot. Therefore, although we grant the motion to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for mandamus relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. The motion to expedite consideration of the petition is denied as moot.
PETITION DENIED.