Case Name: ESCGOV, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BMC SOFTWARE, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-03-16
Citations: 597 F. App'x 181
Docket Number: No. 14-2054
Parties: ESCGOV, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BMC SOFTWARE, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 597
Pages: 181–181

Head Matter:
ESCGOV, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BMC SOFTWARE, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 14-2054.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 27, 2015.
Decided: March 16, 2015.
Christopher A. Abel, Stephanie N. Gilbert, D. Sutton Hirschler, III, Willcox & Savage, PC, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellant. Benjamin G. Chew, Nigel L. Wilkinson, Joshua N. Drian, Manatt, Phelps & Phillips LLP, Washington, D.C.; T. Michael Guiffré, Squire Patton Boggs, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
ESCgov, Inc., appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of BMC Software, Inc., on its claims for breach of contract, tortious interference with a contract, civil conspiracy, and statutory conspiracy. We have reviewed the record and the parties' arguments on appeal, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See ESCgov, Inc. v. BMC Software, Inc., No. 1:13-cv-1344, 2014 WL 3891660 (E.D.Va. Aug. 7, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.