Case Name: FILOMENA MIGLIACCIO, ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM, ETC., APPELLANT, v. PUBLIC SERVICE RAILWAY COMPANY, RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1932-10-17
Citations: 109 N.J.L. 351
Docket Number: 
Parties: FILOMENA MIGLIACCIO, ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM, ETC., APPELLANT, v. PUBLIC SERVICE RAILWAY COMPANY, RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 109
Pages: 351–351

Head Matter:
FILOMENA MIGLIACCIO, ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM, ETC., APPELLANT, v. PUBLIC SERVICE RAILWAY COMPANY, RESPONDENT.
Argued May 19, 1932 —
Decided October 17, 1932.
For the appellant, Feinberg & Feinberg.
For the respondent, Henry H. Fryling.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion filed in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Van Buskirk, Kays, Dear, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.