Case Name: David SMILEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-01-28
Citations: 95 S.W.3d 171
Docket Number: No. WD 60959
Parties: David SMILEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before JAMES M. SMART, JR., Presiding Judge, ROBERT G. ULRICH, Judge, and RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 95
Pages: 171–172

Head Matter:
David SMILEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 60959.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jan. 28, 2003.
Andrew Sehroeder, Assistant State Public Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Andrea Mazza Follett, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before JAMES M. SMART, JR., Presiding Judge, ROBERT G. ULRICH, Judge, and RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
David Smiley appeals the denial, without evidentiary hearing, of his motion for post-conviction relief under Supreme Court Rule 29.15. That motion alleged that he received ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel regarding the failure to preserve and argue on appeal the trial court's denial of his motion claiming that the charges against him were improperly joined and seeking to sever those offenses for purposes of trial.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no prec-edential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).