Case Name: Yates et al., Appellants, v. Mansfield Board of Education, Appellee
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2003-05-16
Citations: 99 Ohio St. 3d 48
Docket Number: No. 2002-2242
Parties: Yates et al., Appellants, v. Mansfield Board of Education, Appellee.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton and O’Con-nor, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 99
Pages: 48–49

Head Matter:
Yates et al., Appellants, v. Mansfield Board of Education, Appellee.
[Cite as Yates v. Mansfield Bd. of Edn., 99 Ohio St.3d 48, 2003-Ohio-2461.]
(No. 2002-2242
Submitted March 25, 2003
Decided May 16, 2003.)

Opinion:
{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal on Proposition of Law No. I is allowed. Briefing is to proceed on Proposition of Law No. I.
{¶ 2} The cause is allowed on Proposition of Law No. II. The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings on Proposition of Law No. II consistent with Hubbard v. Canton City School Bd. of Edn., 97 Ohio St.3d 451, 2002-Ohio-6718, 780 N.E.2d 543.
Robert J. Vecchio Co., L.P.A., and Robert J. Vecchio, for appellants.
Lutz & Oxley Co., L.P.A., Fred M. Oxley and Erin N. Cahill, for appellee.
Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton and O'Con-nor, JJ., concur.
Cook, J., dissents.