Case Name: John LINDSAY, Appellant, v. Karen HOLLAND-COOK, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-05-24
Citations: 164 S.W.3d 141
Docket Number: No. ED 84991
Parties: John LINDSAY, Appellant, v. Karen HOLLAND-COOK, Respondent.
Judges: Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J. and LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J. and MARY K HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 164
Pages: 141–141

Head Matter:
John LINDSAY, Appellant, v. Karen HOLLAND-COOK, Respondent.
No. ED 84991.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
May 24, 2005.
Brown & Crouppen, Seth S. Webb, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
DeFranco Law Firm, Cody S. Moon, O’Fallon, IL, for respondent.
Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J. and LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J. and MARY K HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
John Lindsay appeals the judgment of the trial court granting a motion for a directed verdict in favor of Karen Holland-Cook.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).