Case Name: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. DURLAND PARRISH.
Court: North Carolina Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 2004-10-05
Citations: 603 S.E.2d 584
Docket Number: No. COA03-1638
Parties: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
v.
DURLAND PARRISH.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Eastern Reporter 2d
Volume: 603
Pages: 584–584

Head Matter:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
v.
DURLAND PARRISH.
No. COA03-1638
North Carolina Court of Appeals.
Filed October 5, 2004.
This case not for publication
Pender County, No. 03 CRS 51882.
Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Q. Shante' Martin, for the State.
Appellate Defender Staples Hughes for defendant-appellant.

Opinion:
TIMMONS-GOODSON, Judge.
Defendant pled guilty, pursuant to a plea agreement, to first-degree sex offense with a child. In accordance with the terms of the plea agreement, the trial court sentenced defendant to a presumptive term of 192-240 months imprisonment. Defendant appeals.
Counsel appointed to represent defendant has been unable to identify any issue with sufficient merit to support a meaningful argument for relief on appeal, and asks that this Court conduct its own review of the record for possible prejudicial error. Counsel has also shown to the satisfaction of this Court that he has complied with the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S.738, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493, reh'g denied, 388 U.S. 924, 18 L. Ed. 2d 1377 (1967), and State v. Kinch, 314 N.C. 99, 331 S.E.2d 665 (1985), by advising defendant of his right to file written arguments with this Court and providing him with the documents necessary for him to do so.
Defendant has not filed any written arguments on his own behalf with this Court, and a reasonable time in which he could have done so has passed. In accordance with Anders, we have fully examined the record to determine whether any issues of arguable merit appear therefrom or whether the appeal is wholly frivolous. We conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Furthermore, we have examined the record for possible prejudicial error and have found none.
No error.
Judges CALABRIA and LEVINSON concur.
Report per Rule 30(e).