Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Montoya JORDAN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-09-04
Citations: 581 F. App'x 407
Docket Number: No. 13-11179
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Montoya JORDAN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 581
Pages: 407–408

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Montoya JORDAN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-11179.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Sept. 4, 2014.
James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Kevin Joel Page, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Dallas, TX, Christopher Allen Curtis, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Fort Worth, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before REAVLEY, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the following reason.
The term of supervised release was revoked as provided by law. Jordan claims the court lost jurisdiction to do so because the term had expired before the warrant was issued. The statute, 18 U.S.C. § 358S(i), states that the power of the court extends for any period necessary for adjudication if "before its expiration, a warrant or summons has issued." This warrant was issued on October 2, and the supervised release term ended the following day. Jordan complains that the clerk signed the warrant and not the judge. The clerk did sign it at the direction of the judge. Nothing more was required. The warrant was issued as the statute required.
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.