Case Name: THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. T. Lamar HAZEN, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1984-02-02
Citations: 445 So. 2d 341
Docket Number: No. 62900
Parties: THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. T. Lamar HAZEN, Respondent.
Judges: BOYD, Acting C.J., and OVERTON, MCDONALD, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 445
Pages: 341–341

Head Matter:
THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. T. Lamar HAZEN, Respondent.
No. 62900.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Feb. 2, 1984.
John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, Stanley A. Spring, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, and Diane Victor Lutes, Bar Counsel, Tampa, for complainant.
William R. Korp of Isphording, Payne, Korp, Muirhead & Gay, Venice, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The Florida Bar filed an eight-count complaint against Hazen, charging him with violating Florida Bar Integration Rule, article XI, Rule 11.02(4) and DR 9-102(A). The referee appointed by this Court held a hearing, at which time the bar dismissed three of the counts. The referee recommends that Hazen be found not guilty of two of the counts and that he be found guilty of the remaining three counts. As to discipline, the referee recommends that Hazen be suspended for six months from the date of his initial temporary suspension (February 15, 1982) and thereafter until he proves his rehabilitation pursuant to rule 11.10(3).
Neither Hazen nor the bar has petitioned for review of the referee's report and recommendations. We have examined the record and adopt both the report and the recommended penalty. Costs in the amount of $3,883.57 are hereby taxed against Hazen.
It is so ordered.
BOYD, Acting C.J., and OVERTON, MCDONALD, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur.
The period of suspension, therefore, has already expired. We note, however, that the temporary suspension has never been lifted.