Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Denis Omar ESPINAL, also known as Dennis Espinal, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-07-13
Citations: 188 F. App'x 323
Docket Number: No. 05-51703
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Denis Omar ESPINAL, also known as Dennis Espinal, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 188
Pages: 323–323

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Denis Omar ESPINAL, also known as Dennis Espinal, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-51703.
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Decided July 13, 2006.
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Henry Joseph Bemporad, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Denis Omar Espinal raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.