Case Name: Frank E. SCOTT and Dorothy J. Scott, his wife, Appellants, v. WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC. OF FLORIDA, a Florida corporation, and Joseph E. Jack, Robert E. Oliver and Howard Harrenberg, individually, jointly and severally, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-01-25
Citations: 537 So. 2d 686
Docket Number: No. 88-2469
Parties: Frank E. SCOTT and Dorothy J. Scott, his wife, Appellants, v. WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC. OF FLORIDA, a Florida corporation, and Joseph E. Jack, Robert E. Oliver and Howard Harrenberg, individually, jointly and severally, Appellees.
Judges: HERSEY, C.J., and DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 537
Pages: 686–687

Head Matter:
Frank E. SCOTT and Dorothy J. Scott, his wife, Appellants, v. WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC. OF FLORIDA, a Florida corporation, and Joseph E. Jack, Robert E. Oliver and Howard Harrenberg, individually, jointly and severally, Appellees.
No. 88-2469.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jan. 25, 1989.
Alan E. Brady of Suto, Sider, Doner & Baldovin, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellants.
Edward D. Schuster of Pyszka, Kessler, Massey, Weldon, Catri, Holton & Douber-ley, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.

Opinion:
FASTRACK APPEAL
PER CURIAM.
An order simply granting a motion to dismiss a complaint "with prejudice" is not a final appealable order. Russell v. Russell, 507 So.2d 661 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). The judicial labor remaining to be accomplished at the trial court level (upon appropriate application) is an order dismissing the complaint with prejudice. Thus, we are without jurisdiction to consider this appeal.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HERSEY, C.J., and DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.