Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roger Dale CHARLES, II, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-03-06
Citations: 268 F. App'x 214
Docket Number: No. 07-7415
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Roger Dale CHARLES, II, Defendant— Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 268
Pages: 214–214

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Roger Dale CHARLES, II, Defendant— Appellant.
No. 07-7415.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 28, 2008.
Decided: March 6, 2008.
Roger Dale Charles, II, Appellant Pro Se. Joshua Brian Howard, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina; Jill Westmoreland Rose, Office of the United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Roger Dale Charles, II, appeals the district court's order construing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition as a motion to compel his attorney to produce a full copy of the record and denying it. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Charles, No. 2:04-cr-00027 (W.D. N.C. Sept. 7, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.