Case Name: Oneida O. WIETZ, Petitioner, v. PUBLIX SUPERMARKET, Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1968-06-26
Citations: 212 So. 2d 5
Docket Number: No. 37347
Parties: Oneida O. WIETZ, Petitioner, v. PUBLIX SUPERMARKET, Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
Judges: CALDWELL, C. J., and ROBERTS, THORNAL, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 212
Pages: 5–6

Head Matter:
Oneida O. WIETZ, Petitioner, v. PUBLIX SUPERMARKET, Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
No. 37347.
Supreme Court of Florida.
June 26, 1968.
L. C. Schowe, St. Petersburg, for petitioner.
Glenn M. Woodworth, St. Petersburg, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date February 26, 1968.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is, therefore, denied.
Petitioner's application for attorney's fees is also denied.
CALDWELL, C. J., and ROBERTS, THORNAL, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.