Case Name: Philip SATAHOO, a/k/a David Taylor, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2005-02-23
Citations: 895 So. 2d 1195
Docket Number: No. 3D04-1048
Parties: Philip SATAHOO, a/k/a David Taylor, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before COPE, GREEN and SHEPHERD, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 895
Pages: 1195–1195

Head Matter:
Philip SATAHOO, a/k/a David Taylor, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D04-1048.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 23, 2005.
Philip Satahoo, a/k/a David Taylor, in proper person.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Consuelo Maingot, Assistant Attorney General (Ft.Lauderdale), for appellee.
Before COPE, GREEN and SHEPHERD, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the denial of the defendant's motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) finding that his claim of vindictive sentencing cannot be raised in a motion to correct illegal sentence. Wright v. State, 891 So.2d 618 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Boyd v. State, 880 So.2d 726 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). We also certify direct conflict with Johnson v. State, 877 So.2d 795 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).
Affirmed; direct conflict certified.