Case Name: In re: Stanley Reid HENRICKSEN, Debtor, Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, Appellee, v. Stanley Reid Henricksen, Appellant, Nauni Jo Manty, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-06-21
Citations: 185 F. App'x 561
Docket Number: No. 05-2639
Parties: In re: Stanley Reid HENRICKSEN, Debtor, Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, Appellee, v. Stanley Reid Henricksen, Appellant, Nauni Jo Manty, Appellee.
Judges: Before RILEY, MAGILL, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 185
Pages: 561–561

Head Matter:
In re: Stanley Reid HENRICKSEN, Debtor, Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, Appellee, v. Stanley Reid Henricksen, Appellant, Nauni Jo Manty, Appellee.
No. 05-2639.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: June 16, 2006.
Decided: June 21, 2006.
Eric Tostrud, Lockridge & Grindal, Margaret Henrietta Culp, Blackwell & Igbanugo, Minneapolis, MN, for Appellees.
Stanley Reid Henricksen, Duluth, MN, pro se.
Nauni Jo Manty, Rider & Bennett, Minneapolis, MN, pro se.
Before RILEY, MAGILL, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Debtor Stanley Henricksen (Henricksen) appeals the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's (BAP's) denial of his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion. We hold the BAP did not abuse its discretion in denying Henricksen's Rule 60(b) motion. See In re Kirwan, 164 F.3d 1175, 1177 (8th Cir.1999) (standard review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.