Case Name: S.S.M., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2004-06-16
Citations: 875 So. 2d 763
Docket Number: No. 3D03-3065
Parties: S.S.M., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before COPE, GREEN, and RAMIREZ, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 875
Pages: 763–763

Head Matter:
S.S.M., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D03-3065.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
June 16, 2004.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Marti Rothenberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Consuelo Maingot, Assistant Attorney General, and Adrienne Sampson, Certified Legal Intern, for appellee.
Before COPE, GREEN, and RAMIREZ, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
As the State properly concedes, a written probation order must conform with the trial court's oral pronouncements at sentencing. We thus reverse and remand for the limited purpose of correcting the written order of probation to reflect the trial court's oral pronouncements, which in this case means that the probation order should reflect that the curfew of 8:00 p.m. does not apply if the juvenile is working past that hour.
Reversed and remanded.