Case Name: Drawdy Investment Company, Appellant, v. Samuel A. Robinson, Appellee
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1926-04-21
Citations: 91 Fla. 669
Docket Number: 
Parties: Drawdy Investment Company, Appellant, v. Samuel A. Robinson, Appellee.
Judges: Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 91
Pages: 669–670

Head Matter:
Drawdy Investment Company, Appellant, v. Samuel A. Robinson, Appellee.
Division B.
Decision Filed April 21, 1926.
MacFarlane & Pettingill, for Appellant;
Louis C. Massey and A. C. Carpenter, for Appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
— This cause having heretofore been sub mitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, Ordered and adjudged by the court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.