Case Name: In the Matter of Richie Arrollo, Petitioner, v. Lucien Leclaire, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2009-05-21
Citations: 62 A.D.3d 1171
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Richie Arrollo, Petitioner, v Lucien Leclaire, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 62
Pages: 1171–1172

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Richie Arrollo, Petitioner, v Lucien Leclaire, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.
[878 NYS2d 637]

Opinion:
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Following an anonymous tip, petitioner's cell was searched and officers found a sharpened metal rod and letters discussing drugs, killing and purported gang activity. As a result, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with, among other things, possession of a weapon and unauthorized organizational materials. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of the enumerated charges. After an unsuccessful administrative appeal, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.
Petitioner claims that the misbehavior report did not support the charge of possessing unauthorized organizational materials. We disagree. The misbehavior report, hearing testimony and documentary evidence, which consisted of the letters themselves, provide substantial evidence to support the determination that petitioner was guilty of possessing unauthorized organizational materials (see Matter of Williams v Dubray, 57 AD3d 1185, 1185 [2008]; Matter of Thorpe v Fischer, 53 AD3d 1003, 1004 [2008]). In fact, petitioner admitted that one letter contained mention of "two known unauthorized groups." We have examined petitioner's remaining contentions and, to the extent preserved, find them to be unavailing.
Cardona, P.J., Peters, Rose, Kavanagh and McCarthy, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.