Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Ras I.K.B.M. CLARK, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2007-05-09
Citations: 221 S.W.3d 477
Docket Number: No. ED 88562
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Ras I.K.B.M. CLARK, Appellant.
Judges: Before GEORGE W. DRAPER III, P.J. and GARY M. GAERTNER, SR. and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 221
Pages: 477–478

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Ras I.K.B.M. CLARK, Appellant.
No. ED 88562.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
May 9, 2007.
Stephan Bell, Fulton, MO, for Appellant.
Andrea S. Hayes, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, Mexico, MO, for Respondent.
Before GEORGE W. DRAPER III, P.J. and GARY M. GAERTNER, SR. and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Ras I.K.B.M. Clark ("Defendant") appeals from the judgment upon his conviction following a jury trial for the class A misdemeanor of possession of a controlled substance, in violation of Section 195.202, RSMo 2000, for which he was sentenced to three months' imprisonment. Defendant argues the trial court erred in overruling his motion for judgment of acquittal because the State failed to produce sufficient evidence to support the conviction.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).