Case Name: Frances Owen WARRINER, a/k/a Frances O. Warriner, Appellant, v. CASA LOMA LAND CORP., a Florida Corporation, etc., et al., and Chase Federal Savings and Loan Association, a United States of America corporation, etc., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1975-11-18
Citations: 324 So. 2d 675
Docket Number: No. 74-551
Parties: Frances Owen WARRINER, a/k/a Frances O. Warriner, Appellant, v. CASA LOMA LAND CORP., a Florida Corporation, etc., et al., and Chase Federal Savings and Loan Association, a United States of America corporation, etc., Appellees.
Judges: Before PEARSON, HAVERFIELD and NATHAN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 324
Pages: 675–675

Head Matter:
Frances Owen WARRINER, a/k/a Frances O. Warriner, Appellant, v. CASA LOMA LAND CORP., a Florida Corporation, etc., et al., and Chase Federal Savings and Loan Association, a United States of America corporation, etc., Appellees.
No. 74-551.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 18, 1975.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 23, 1976.
Frances Owen Warriner, in pro per.
Berkell & Straus, Sue Rose Samuels, North Miami Beach, Terrell, Baisden, Peterson, Stanton & Stillman, Miami Beach, for appellees.
Before PEARSON, HAVERFIELD and NATHAN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The opinion of the trial court sets forth its finding as follows:
*
" . . . the identical claims and legal theories had been previously adjudicated by the Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit in and for Dade County, Florida and by the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals as evidenced by a brief filed by the Plaintiff as Appellant in the United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, Case No. 72-1550, which affirmatively and on its face demonstrates that there is nothing in the Amended Complaint which was not or could not have been raised, argued or urged by the Plaintiff in the previous litigation; and because there must be an end to the litigation (See Butler v. Bertram & Co., 281 So.2d 227 (3rd D.C.A.1973)) . . ."
*
The record supports the finding. It is therefore affirmed.
Affirmed.