Case Name: Cebie Woodrow HUGHES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1955-02-16
Citations: 276 S.W.2d 813
Docket Number: No. 27430
Parties: Cebie Woodrow HUGHES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 276
Pages: 813–815

Head Matter:
Cebie Woodrow HUGHES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
No. 27430.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Feb. 16, 1955.
Rehearing Denied March 30, 1955.
Ben F. Mooring, Paris, for appellant.
Leon Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
DICE, Commissioner.
Appellant was convicted of unlawfully driving a motor vehicle upon a public highway while intoxicated, and his punishment was assessed at three days in jail and a fine of fifty dollars.
The statement of facts appearing in the record is not shown to have been filed with the clerk of the trial court as re quired by Article 759a, section 4, Vernon's Ann.C.C.P., and therefore cannot be considered as a part of the record on appeal. Williams v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 264 S.W.2d 112.
In the absence of a statement of facts, this court cannot pass upon the appellant's ' contention that the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction, Shaddix v. State, 90 Tex.Cr.R. 431, 235 S.W. 602; Lewis v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 243 S.W.2d 706; and likewise, cannot appraise the exceptions to the court's charge, the refusal of a requested charge or the bills of exception complaining of the introduction in evidence of certain testimony. Smith v. State, 144 Tex.Cr.R. 172, 161 S.W.2d 795; Whistler v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 244 S.W.2d 818, and Conde v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 252 S.W.2d 195.
The complaint and information, as well as: ail other' matters' of procedure, appear regular/ therefore, nothing is presented' for review.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.' :
Opinion approved by the court