Case Name: Armon EVERETT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2017-01-25
Citations: 208 So. 3d 833
Docket Number: No. 3D15-1219
Parties: Armon EVERETT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SALTER, FERNANDEZ, and LOGUE, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 208
Pages: 833–833

Head Matter:
Armon EVERETT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D15-1219
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Opinion filed January 25, 2017
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Natasha Baker-Bradley, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jay E. Silver, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SALTER, FERNANDEZ, and LOGUE, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Floyd v. State, 569 So.2d 1225, 1232 (Fla. 1990) ("Lay witness opinion is admissible if it is within the ken of an intelligent person with a degree of experience. . We find the officers' testimony within the permissible range of lay observation and ordinary police experience.")