Case Name: A. A. Stasel, Receiver of The Newark Savings Bank Co., v. G. C. Daugherty
Court: Licking County Court of Common Pleas
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1907-01
Citations: 7 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 424
Docket Number: 
Parties: A. A. Stasel, Receiver of The Newark Savings Bank Co., v. G. C. Daugherty.
Judges: 
Reporter: Ohio nisi prius and general term reports (new series)
Volume: 7
Pages: 424–424

Head Matter:
SET-OFF ON CLAIM OF INSOLVENT BANK.
Common Pleas Court of Licking County.
A. A. Stasel, Receiver of The Newark Savings Bank Co., v. G. C. Daugherty.
Decided, January Term, 1907.
Banlcs and Banicing — Receiver—Set-off—Promissory Note — Rights of Depositor.
The maker of a promissory note held by the receiver of an insolvent bank has no right to set ofE a deposit in the bank standing in his name as executor.
A. A. Stasel, for plaintiff.
Killer <& Montgomery, contra.

Opinion:
Seward, J.
(orally).
This case is submitted to the court upon the pleadings and the evidence. I might say that there is, substantially, an agreed statement of facts in the ease.
This is a suit brought by Stasel, as receiver, v. Daugherty to recover on a promissory note. Daugherty files an answer setting up what is claimed to be a set-off, he having been a depositor in the bank of which Stasel is receiver. That deposit is in the name of Daugherty, as executor of Hickey..
The question is whether Daugherty has a right to set off this claim which he has against the bank as executor.
The court does not think lie has, and there may be a judgment' for the plaintiff. Motion for new trial overruled.