Case Name: Midtown Plottage Corporation, Appellant, v. James Sullivan, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1928-02-16
Citations: 131 Misc. 473
Docket Number: 
Parties: Midtown Plottage Corporation, Appellant, v. James Sullivan, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 131
Pages: 473–474

Head Matter:
Midtown Plottage Corporation, Appellant, v. James Sullivan, Respondent.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
February 16, 1928.
Charles J. Herson, for the appellant.
James I. Moore, for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Manifestly, in line with our decision in Godwin v. Hauer (N. Y. L. J. Feb. 8, 1924), where under the 1923 amendment to section 125 of the Municipal Court Code the attorney for the successful party refuses to prepare the judgment, the opposing attorney or the clerk, under direction of the court, may prepare the judgment.
As none of the orders appealed from are appealable as of course, and no permission to appeal appears in the papers, the appeals must be dismissed.
Appeals dismissed.
All concur; present, Delehanty, Lydon and Levy, JJ.