Case Name: In the Matter of the Claim of Rose Sperling, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1963-12-19
Citations: 20 A.D.2d 584
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Claim of Rose Sperling, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 20
Pages: 584–584

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Claim of Rose Sperling, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Opinion:
What constitutes "good cause" within the meaning of subdivision 1 of section 593 of the Labor Law is a question of fact and thus within the province of the board if its findings are supported by substantial evidence (Labor Law, § 623; Matter of Lipschitz [Lubin], 7 A D 2d 777). On the present record we find no reason to disturb the board's determination. Decision unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present —Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ.