Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Earl Anthony NEVILS, a/k/a Earl Nevils, Jr., Earl Bowman, Earl Johnson, Alfred Johnson, "Babycriptoe", "Lilamigo" and "Baby Frog," Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-06-16
Citations: 570 F.3d 1123
Docket Number: No. 06-50485
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Earl Anthony NEVILS, a/k/a Earl Nevils, Jr., Earl Bowman, Earl Johnson, Alfred Johnson, “Babycriptoe”, “Lilamigo” and “Baby Frog,” Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 570
Pages: 1123–1124

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Earl Anthony NEVILS, a/k/a Earl Nevils, Jr., Earl Bowman, Earl Johnson, Alfred Johnson, “Babycriptoe”, “Lilamigo” and “Baby Frog,” Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-50485.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Filed June 16, 2009.
Aria, CA, Michael J. Raphael, Esquire, Assistant U.S., George S. Cardona, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Elizabeth Newman, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Opinion:
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.