Case Name: Harold D. JOHNSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1971-05-26
Citations: 467 S.W.2d 431
Docket Number: No. 43790
Parties: Harold D. JOHNSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 467
Pages: 431–431

Head Matter:
Harold D. JOHNSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
No. 43790.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
May 26, 1971.
Rollin Khoury, Waco, (court appointed), for appellant.
Martin D. Eichelberger, Dist. Atty. Frank M. Fitzpatrick, Jr., Kenneth H. Crow and James R. Barlow, Asst. Dist. Attys., Waco, and Jim D. Vollers, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
OPINION
DOUGLAS, Judge.
The appeal is from a conviction for passing as true a forged instrument. After a finding of guilty by a jury, the judge assessed the punishment at five years.
The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged. The record reflects that the appellant passed a forged check in the sum of $93.60 to purchase a bus ticket for approximately $15.00 and received the balance in cash. Later the ticket was turned in and the money was refunded.
Appellant complains that reversible error was committed when the court did not charge on circumstantial evidence. Even if such a charge should have been given, the record does not contain a written objection to the court's charge under Article 36.14, Vernon's Ann.C.C.P., or a requested charge under Article 36.15, V.A.C. C.P., and nothing is presented for review. Pendleton v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 434 S.W. 2d 694. See Cole v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 458 S.W.2d 195.
No reversible error is shown.
The judgment is affirmed.