Case Name: Dwight A. RUDISILL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Darlene DREW, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-10-21
Citations: 451 F. App'x 280
Docket Number: No. 11-6961
Parties: Dwight A. RUDISILL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Darlene DREW, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 451
Pages: 280–280

Head Matter:
Dwight A. RUDISILL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Darlene DREW, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 11-6961.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 18, 2011.
Decided: Oct. 21, 2011.
Dwight Alexander Rudisill, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Dwight A. Rudisill, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2011) petition. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Rudisill's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, Rudisill has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.