Case Name: Ronald V. AQUINO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-10-20
Citations: 661 So. 2d 424
Docket Number: No. 95-1181
Parties: Ronald V. AQUINO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: COBB, SHARP, W. and ANTOON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 661
Pages: 424–425

Head Matter:
Ronald V. AQUINO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 95-1181.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Oct. 20, 1995.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and M.A Lucas, Assistant Public Defender, Day-tona Beach, for Appellant.
No Appearance for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this Anders appeal, we find on the face of the record that there is a discrepancy between the oral pronouncement and the written sentence. In the context of the entire plea and sentencing hearing, it appears that the discrepancy is the result of a scrivener's error. Accordingly, we remand for the trial court to resolve the discrepancy between the oral pronouncement and the written order. Higginbotham v. State, 659 So.2d 461; Marchand v. State, 546 So.2d 1184 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989); Wilkins v. State, 543 So.2d 800 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 554 So.2d 1170 (Fla.1989). In all other respects, the convictions and sentences are affirmed.
AFFIRMED; REMANDED for correction of scrivener's error.
COBB, SHARP, W. and ANTOON, JJ., concur.
. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).