Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MARK CLIFFORD LOMBARDI, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2000-06-07
Citations: 168 Or. App. 378
Docket Number: 960836110; CA A98097
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MARK CLIFFORD LOMBARDI, Appellant.
Judges: Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Deits, Chief Judge, and Wollheim, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 168
Pages: 378–379

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted April 25,
affirmed June 7,
petition for review denied August 15, 2000 (330 Or 553)
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MARK CLIFFORD LOMBARDI, Appellant.
(960836110; CA A98097)
7 P3d 537
Mary M. Reese, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief was David E. Groom, Public Defender.
Holly A. Vance, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.
Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Deits, Chief Judge, and Wollheim, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant appeals his convictions for multiple sexual offenses. We write only to address his argument that the trial court erred in withholding from disclosure various records after in camera inspection. Assuming, without deciding, that defendant provided an adequate basis for our review, see State v. Weaver, 139 Or App 207, 911 P2d 969, rev den 323 Or 483 (1996), we have reviewed those materials in camera and conclude that the trial court did not err in that regard.
We reject defendant's remaining arguments without discussion.
Affirmed.