Case Name: Bernard SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Parris N. GLENDENING, State of Maryland, Governor; Anthony Williams, Mayor, Washington D.C.; David Garraghty, Warden, Greensville Correctional Center, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-09-18
Citations: 45 F. App'x 317
Docket Number: No. 02-6995
Parties: Bernard SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Parris N. GLENDENING, State of Maryland, Governor; Anthony Williams, Mayor, Washington D.C.; David Garraghty, Warden, Greensville Correctional Center, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 45
Pages: 317–317

Head Matter:
Bernard SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Parris N. GLENDENING, State of Maryland, Governor; Anthony Williams, Mayor, Washington D.C.; David Garraghty, Warden, Greensville Correctional Center, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 02-6995.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 9, 2002.
Decided Sept. 18, 2002.
Bernard Smith, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Bernard Smith appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Smith v. Glendening, No. CA-02-10 (E.D.Va. June 20, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.