Case Name: Walter H. Wilson, Appellant, v. New Process Heating Company, Respondent. The Minneapolis Heat Regulator Company, etc., a Party Defendant, Pursuant to Section 271 of the Civil Practice Act
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1928-01
Citations: 222 A.D. 820
Docket Number: 
Parties: Walter H. Wilson, Appellant, v. New Process Heating Company, Respondent. The Minneapolis Heat Regulator Company, etc., a Party Defendant, Pursuant to Section 271 of the Civil Practice Act.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 222
Pages: 820–820

Head Matter:
Walter H. Wilson, Appellant, v. New Process Heating Company, Respondent. The Minneapolis Heat Regulator Company, etc., a Party Defendant, Pursuant to Section 271 of the Civil Practice Act.

Opinion:
Order granting motion for change of venue reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, upon the grounds (1) that the motion was improperly made in the First District (see rule 63, subdivisions 2-6, Rules of Civil Practice) and (2) that the granting of the motion was not a proper exercise of discretion. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.