Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wendell CARSON, III, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-02-24
Citations: 677 F. App'x 639
Docket Number: No. 16-13604 Non-Argument Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wendell CARSON, III, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before HULL, WILSON and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 677
Pages: 639–639

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wendell CARSON, III, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-13604 Non-Argument Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
(February 24, 2017)
Cherie Krigsman, Germaine Seider, Arthur Lee Bentley, III, Sara C. Sweeney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Howard C. Anderson, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Tampa, FL, Rosemary Cakmis, Meghan Ann Collins, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Orlando, FL, Wendell Carson, III, Coleman, FL, for Defendant-Appellant
Before HULL, WILSON and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Donna Lee Elm, appointed counsel for Wendell Carson, III, in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Carson's revocation of supervised release and sentence are
AFFIRMED.