Case Name: Meritum Corporation, Respondent, v. Edward A. Pichler, as Sheriff of the City of New York, Appellant, and Ploscowe Dweck & Sladkus et al., Respondents; Edward A. Pichler, as Sheriff of the City of New York, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. City of New York, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1982-01-19
Citations: 55 N.Y.2d 876
Docket Number: 
Parties: Meritum Corporation, Respondent, v Edward A. Pichler, as Sheriff of the City of New York, Appellant, and Ploscowe Dweck & Sladkus et al., Respondents. Edward A. Pichler, as Sheriff of the City of New York, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v City of New York, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 55
Pages: 876–876

Head Matter:
Meritum Corporation, Respondent, v Edward A. Pichler, as Sheriff of the City of New York, Appellant, and Ploscowe Dweck & Sladkus et al., Respondents. Edward A. Pichler, as Sheriff of the City of New York, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v City of New York, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
Decided January 19, 1982

Opinion:
Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals sua sponte, upon the grounds that (1) insofar as it is taken from so much of the order of the Appellate Division as affirmed the dismissal of the Sheriff's cross claim against the City of New York, no substantial constitutional question is directly involved; and (2) the order appealed from otherwise does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.