Case Name: Curtis PRINCE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-02-17
Citations: 613 So. 2d 145
Docket Number: No. 92-0213
Parties: Curtis PRINCE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ANSTEAD and WARNER, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Senior Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 613
Pages: 145–145

Head Matter:
Curtis PRINCE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 92-0213.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb. 17, 1993.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Debra Moses Stephens, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Carol Cobourn Asbury, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm appellant's convictions but agree with appellant and the state that the trial court erred in imposing consecutive mandatory minimum sentences under the circumstances of this case. See Daniels v. State, 595 So.2d 952 (Fla.1992). Accordingly, we remand with directions that the sentences be made concurrent.
ANSTEAD and WARNER, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Senior Judge, concur.