Case Name: Dayton Bar Association v. Gunnoe
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1980-12-23
Citations: 64 Ohio St. 2d 172
Docket Number: D.D. No. 80-10
Parties: Dayton Bar Association v. Gunnoe.
Judges: Celebrezze, C. J., W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes and Dowd, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Second Series
Volume: 64
Pages: 172–174

Head Matter:
Dayton Bar Association v. Gunnoe.
(D.D. No. 80-10
Decided December 23, 1980.)
Mr. Richard H. Hammond, for relator.
Messrs. Young, Pryor, Lynn éc.Jerardi and Mr. James T. Lynn, Jr., for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
After a careful examination and review of the record in this cause, this court concurs with the findings of fact and recommendation of the board of commissioners.
Therefore, respondent, Gerald E. Gunnoe, is publicly reprimanded for his misconduct. It is so ordered.
Judgment accordingly.
Celebrezze, C. J., W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes and Dowd, JJ., concur.