Case Name: Couret et al. v. Conner et al.
Court: Mississippi Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Mississippi
Decision Date: 1918-10
Citations: 118 Miss. 598
Docket Number: 
Parties: Couret et al. v. Conner et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Mississippi Reports
Volume: 118
Pages: 598–599

Head Matter:
Couret et al. v. Conner et al.
[79 South. 801,
In Banc.]
Appeal and Error. Correction of mandate. Motion. Time to file.
A motion to correct a judgment of reversal and remand so as to award judgment final, which was filed after adjournment of the supreme court and more than fifteen days after its rendition, which was not predicated on mistake, nor on any ground contained in section 1016, Code 1906. (Hemingway’s Code, section 736), is in reality a suggestion of error and not being filed within the time fixed by r.ule 14 of the' supreme court will be overruled.
Appeal from the chancery court of Adams county.
Hon. E. W. Cutber, Judge.
On Motion To Cobeect Judgment.
The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the court.

Opinion:
Smith, C. J.,
delivered the opinion of the court.
At the last term of this court the decree rendered by the court below in this cause was reversed, and the cause remanded. 79 So. 230. After the adjournment of this court, and more than fifteen days after the judgment was rendered, this motion was filed by appellant, praying that the judgment rendered by us be corrected, so as to award judgment final for appellant here. This motion is not predicated upon any mistake of the clerk in entering a judgment different from that rendered by the court, nor upon any of the matters contained in section 1016, Code of 1906 (section .736, Hemingway's Code), but is predicated solely upon the alleged error of the court in remanding the cause to the court below, instead of rendering final judgment here; consequently it is in reality a suggestion of error, and should have been filed within the time fixed by rule 14 (72 So. viii), but, since it was not so filed, it must be is overruled.
Overruled.