Case Name: Darlene P. LUMPKIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William TORRES, Doctor, Defendant-Appellee, and Miss FRYE, Nurse, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-11-09
Citations: 112 F. App'x 305
Docket Number: No. 04-7078
Parties: Darlene P. LUMPKIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William TORRES, Doctor, Defendant-Appellee, and Miss FRYE, Nurse, Defendant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 112
Pages: 305–305

Head Matter:
Darlene P. LUMPKIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William TORRES, Doctor, Defendant-Appellee, and Miss FRYE, Nurse, Defendant.
No. 04-7078.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 4, 2004.
Decided Nov. 9, 2004.
Darlene P. Lumpkin, Appellant pro se. Edward Joseph McNelis, III, Coreen Antoinette Bromfield, John David McChesney, Rawls & McNelis, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Darlene P. Lumpkin appeals the district court's order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Lumpkin v. Torres, No. CA-02-792-3 (E.D.Va. May 28, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.