Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Paul WILCOX, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-07-13
Citations: 190 F. App'x 391
Docket Number: No. 05-10835
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Paul WILCOX, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 190
Pages: 391–392

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Paul WILCOX, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-10835.
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Decided July 13, 2006.
Susan B. Cowger, Linda R. Rossborough, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.
Jason Douglas Hawkins, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, David Paul Wilcox, Jr., raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Scroggins, 411 F.3d 572, 576-77 (5th Cir.2005), which held that the Due Process Clause does not bar the application of Justice Breyer's remedy opinion in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), when resentencing defendants in light of Booker, and by United States v. Reinhart, 442 F.3d 857, 863 (5th Cir.2006), petition for cert. filed (June 5, 2006) (No. 05-11431), which held that the Ex Post Facto Clause does not apply to the courts. The Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.