Case Name: Jeffrey FRANKLIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert HOREL, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-11-30
Citations: 256 F. App'x 186
Docket Number: No. 07-15428
Parties: Jeffrey FRANKLIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert HOREL, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before: LEAVY, BERZON, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 256
Pages: 186–186

Head Matter:
Jeffrey FRANKLIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert HOREL, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 07-15428.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 26, 2007.
Filed Nov. 30, 2007.
Jeffrey Franklin, Crescent City, CA, pro se.
Before: LEAVY, BERZON, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
On August 6, 2007, this court concluded that, to the extent a certificate of appealability is required in this appeal, the request for a certificate of appealability is denied. By same order, this court determined that, to the extent a certificate of appealability is unnecessary because appellant's claim arises under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, appellant shall show cause as to why the district court's December 20, 2006, judgment should not be summarily affirmed.
A review of appellant's response to the court's order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.