Case Name: Charles H. MEARS, Plaintiff, v. J. M. GIDDING & CO., Inc., Defendant, and Jessie Farquharson and Margaret Wheelock, Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1925-06-01
Citations: 7 F.2d 1020
Docket Number: No. 374
Parties: Charles H. MEARS, Plaintiff, v. J. M. GIDDING & CO., Inc., Defendant, and Jessie Farquharson and Margaret Wheelock, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 7
Pages: 1020–1020

Head Matter:
Charles H. MEARS, Plaintiff, v. J. M. GIDDING & CO., Inc., Defendant, and Jessie Farquharson and Margaret Wheelock, Appellants.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
June 1, 1925.)
No. 374.
Simpson, Thacher & Bartlett, of New York City (Louis Connick and Fred Bielaski, both of New York City, óf counsel), for appellants. Rosenberg & Ball, of New York City (Godfrey Goldmark and Ralph F. Colin, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.
Before, HOUGH and MAN-TON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
There is no difference in legal effect between this case and that of Heineman, etc., Corporation v. Nat Levy & Co., 6 F.(2d) 970, opinion filed in this court April 6, 1925. On the authority of that case, the order below is reversed, with costs.