Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony CHALK, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-11-05
Citations: 486 F. App'x 388
Docket Number: No. 12-6775
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony CHALK, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 486
Pages: 388–389

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony CHALK, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-6775.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 28, 2012.
Decided: Nov. 5, 2012.
Anthony Chalk, Appellant Pro Se. Jimmie Ewing, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appel-lee.
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Chalk appeals the district court's order denying his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Chalk, No. 0:04-cr-00657-JFA-6 (D.S.C. Mar. 29, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.