Case Name: PROPULSION CONTROLS COMPANY, LLC, Appellant, v. Redina BURGE and Division of Employment Security, Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2017-01-24
Citations: 508 S.W.3d 188
Docket Number: WD 79368
Parties: PROPULSION CONTROLS COMPANY, LLC, Appellant, v. Redina BURGE and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.
Judges: Before Division One: Anthony Rex Gabbert, P.J., and Thomas H. Newton and Alok Ahuja, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 508
Pages: 188–188

Head Matter:
PROPULSION CONTROLS COMPANY, LLC, Appellant, v. Redina BURGE and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.
WD 79368
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
FILED: January 24, 2017
Attorneys: Casey P. Murray, Kansas City, MO for appellant, Bart A. Matante for respondent State of Missouri; Redina Burge, acting pro se
Before Division One: Anthony Rex Gabbert, P.J., and Thomas H. Newton and Alok Ahuja, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Redina Burge applied for unemployment benefits after her employment with Propulsion Control Company, LLC was terminated in July ,2015. Propulsion protested the claim on the basis that Burge had been discharged for misconduct. The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission found that Burge's termination was not for misconduct connected with work, and that she was therefore eligible for unemployment benefits. Propulsion appeals, arguing that the Commission's decision is not supported by competent and substantial evidence. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties with an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).