Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. JAMES EDWARD SIMMS, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1990-10-10
Citations: 103 Or. App. 640
Docket Number: C88-09-36506; CA A60375
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. JAMES EDWARD SIMMS, Appellant.
Judges: Before Joseph, Chief Judge, and Rossman and De Muniz, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 103
Pages: 640–641

Head Matter:
Submitted on record and briefs August 20,
convictions affirmed; restitution as condition of probation stricken October 10, 1990
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. JAMES EDWARD SIMMS, Appellant.
(C88-09-36506; CA A60375)
797 P2d 1080
Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem, and Irene B. Taylor, Salem, filed the brief for appellant.
Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Ann Kelley, Assistant Attorney General, and Lauri Alsup, Certified Law Student, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Joseph, Chief Judge, and Rossman and De Muniz, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant was indicted with a co-defendant in a 9-count indictment. Only Counts 1 through 6 accused defendant and his co-defendant. The other counts pertained to the co-defendant alone; two of those counts involved the property of Dong Nguyen. Defendant was convicted on Counts 2, 3, 4 and 5; on Count 5, the court imposed a suspended sentence and placed defendant on probation, subject to the condition that he pay restitution for damage to Nguyen's property.
The state concedes that the trial court erred. Nguyen was not a victim of defendant's criminal activities, and defendant was not convicted of and did not admit either of the counts that related to Nguyen's property. Restitution was not authorized. ORS 137.106(1).
Convictions affirmed; restitution as condition of probation stricken.