Case Name: James GRUBBS, Employee/Respondent, v. SPECTRUM CLEANING SERVICES, INC., Employer/Appellant, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-09-27
Citations: 175 S.W.3d 165
Docket Number: No. ED 85810
Parties: James GRUBBS, Employee/Respondent, v. SPECTRUM CLEANING SERVICES, INC., Employer/Appellant, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent.
Judges: Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J. and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 175
Pages: 165–166

Head Matter:
James GRUBBS, Employee/Respondent, v. SPECTRUM CLEANING SERVICES, INC., Employer/Appellant, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent.
No. ED 85810.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Sept. 27, 2005.
Rehearing Denied Nov. 2, 2005.
Jenkins & Kling, P.C., Roger W. Pecha and Jocelyn A. Brennan, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Larry R. Ruhmann, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.
James Grubbs, acting pro se.
Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J. and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Spectrum Cleaning Services, Inc. appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) in favor of James Grubbs (Employee) determining that Employee was not discharged for misconduct connected with work.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error lack merit. The order of the Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. No error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the Commission's order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).