Case Name: Kalilon Taal et al., Appellants, v. Robert A. Krobatsch, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2001-03-26
Citations: 281 A.D.2d 621
Docket Number: 
Parties: Kalilon Taal et al., Appellants, v Robert A. Krobatsch, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 281
Pages: 621–622

Head Matter:
Kalilon Taal et al., Appellants, v Robert A. Krobatsch, Respondent.
[722 NYS2d 186]

Opinion:
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), entered January 6, 2000, which, upon a jury verdict, and upon the denial of their motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 to set aside the verdict, is in favor of the defendant and against them dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The trial court properly denied the plaintiffs' motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 to set aside the verdict, as the jury verdict in favor of the defendant could have been reached on a fair interpretation of the evidence (see, Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129, 134). Altman, J. P., McGinity, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.