Case Name: Michael Anthony DAVIS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-09-16
Citations: 623 So. 2d 1189
Docket Number: No. 80922
Parties: Michael Anthony DAVIS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: BARRETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 623
Pages: 1189–1189

Head Matter:
Michael Anthony DAVIS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 80922.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Sept. 16, 1993.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender and Brad Permar, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Dale E. Tarpley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We review Davis v. State, 609 So.2d 131 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), based on a certified question. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We answered the question in Tripp v. State, 622 So.2d 941 (Fla.1993). The decision of the district court of appeal, insofar as it affected petitioner's sentencing, is quashed and the case is remanded for reconsideration in light of our opinion in Tripp.
It is so ordered.
BARRETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.