Case Name: Joseph WOJCICKI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AIKEN TECHNICAL COLLEGE; Susan A. Winsor, ex Graham ATC president; William Tilt, Associate Vice President of Technical Education; Thomas Desrocher, Program Coordinator; Lee Powell, Human Resources Director, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-03-21
Citations: 418 F. App'x 247
Docket Number: No. 10-1901
Parties: Joseph WOJCICKI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AIKEN TECHNICAL COLLEGE; Susan A. Winsor, ex Graham ATC president; William Tilt, Associate Vice President of Technical Education; Thomas Desrocher, Program Coordinator; Lee Powell, Human Resources Director, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and AGEE and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 418
Pages: 247–247

Head Matter:
Joseph WOJCICKI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AIKEN TECHNICAL COLLEGE; Susan A. Winsor, ex Graham ATC president; William Tilt, Associate Vice President of Technical Education; Thomas Desrocher, Program Coordinator; Lee Powell, Human Resources Director, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 10-1901.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 2, 2011.
Decided: March 21, 2011.
Joseph Wojcicki, Appellant Pro Se. Charles J. Boykin, Shunna T. Vance, Boy-kin & Davis, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and AGEE and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Joseph Wojcicki seeks to appeal the district court's orders adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny his motions for default judgment or, in the alternative, for summary judgment, and denying reconsideration of that order.
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The orders Wojcicki seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.