Case Name: Paul David JACOBSON, Appellant, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1983-05-09
Citations: 433 So. 2d 991
Docket Number: No. AL-66
Parties: Paul David JACOBSON, Appellant, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION, Appellee.
Judges: ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., C.J., and LARRY G. SMITH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 433
Pages: 991–992

Head Matter:
Paul David JACOBSON, Appellant, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION, Appellee.
No. AL-66.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
May 9, 1983.
Sheryl Lowenthal Javits, Miami, for appellant.
John C. Courtney, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Florida Parole & Probation Com’n, Tallahassee, for appellee.

Opinion:
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
PER CURIAM.
Appellant seeks rehearing of our prior per curiam, 431 So.2d 992, affirmance of the Florida Parole and Probation Commission's order which found no cause to modify his presumptive parole release date (PPRD) following a biennial review request. We deny appellant's motion for rehearing.
Appellant argues that the Commission applied two illegal substitute aggravations in calculating his PPRD. The propriety of the aggravations about which appellant complains has previously been decided adversely to him in Jacobson v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission, 407 So.2d 611 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), dealing with the initial establishment of his PPRD. Furthermore, appellant is improperly using the biennial review as an excuse to relitigate the establishment of his PPRD. See Dornau v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission, 420 So.2d 894 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Gatto v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission, 415 So.2d 869 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). Accordingly, appellant's motion for rehearing is DENIED.
ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., C.J., and LARRY G. SMITH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.