Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Howard O. BOISSEAU, III, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-05-26
Citations: 325 F. App'x 223
Docket Number: No. 08-8510
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Howard O. BOISSEAU, III, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 325
Pages: 223–224

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Howard O. BOISSEAU, III, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 08-8510.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 7, 2009.
Decided: May 26, 2009.
Howard 0. Boisseau, III, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Howard 0. Boisseau, III, appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Boisseau, No. 3:00-cr-00245-REP-1 (E.D.Va. Nov. 12, 2008). We also deny Boisseau's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.