Case Name: Andy GILLETTE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-01-17
Citations: 181 S.W.3d 632
Docket Number: No. WD 65529
Parties: Andy GILLETTE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before SPINDEN, P.J., and HOWARD and HOLLIGER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 181
Pages: 632–633

Head Matter:
Andy GILLETTE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 65529.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jan. 17, 2006.
Nancy A. McKerrow, Assistant Public Defender, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jayne T. Woods, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before SPINDEN, P.J., and HOWARD and HOLLIGER, JJ.

Opinion:
Order
PER CURIAM.
Andy Gillette moved for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035. Gillette alleged that his plea counsel was ineffective for promising Gillette that if he took the State's offer of a ten-year sentence, he would also be sentenced to long-term drug treatment, which did not occur. After an evidentiary hearing, the motion court denied Gillette's motion. Gillette argues on appeal that the motion court's findings and conclusions that plea counsel was not ineffective were clearly erroneous. Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).