Case Name: Frank E. VOTH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Guy HALL; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-07-24
Citations: 286 F. App'x 344
Docket Number: No. 08-35145
Parties: Frank E. VOTH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Guy HALL; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 286
Pages: 344–344

Head Matter:
Frank E. VOTH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Guy HALL; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 08-35145.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 24, 2008.
Frank E. Voth, Umatilla, OR, pro se.
Joseph Groshong, Trial Division, Salem, OR, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: SCHROEDER, LEAVY and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Appellees' motion for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The Clerk shall file the answering brief received on July 3, 2008.
Upon review of the record and the parties' briefs, this court hereby summarily affirms the district court's order denying appellant's motion for preliminary injunc-tive relief as moot. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (summary affirmance appropriate where result is clear from face of record).
All other pending motions are denied as moot.
Appellant's petition for writ of mandamus filed in this appeal on May 21, 2008 is denied.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.