Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Haze SHUMPERT, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1990-05-29
Citations: 789 S.W.2d 885
Docket Number: No. 54431
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Haze SHUMPERT, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 789
Pages: 885–885

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Haze SHUMPERT, Appellant.
No. 54431.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
May 29, 1990.
Henry B. Robertson, Deborah B. Wafer, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Robert P. Sass, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Movant appeals from denial of his post-conviction Rule 29.15 motion seeking to set aside his conviction and sentence of ten years for sodomy. The motion was based on ineffectiveness of counsel. We find no error in the court's denial of the motion, that the judgment is based upon findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that an opinion would have no precedential value. A statement in support of our conclusion has been furnished to the parties. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).