Case Name: James M. LASSITER and Jonathan Lawrence Berg, Appellants, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1984-06-07
Citations: 672 S.W.2d 632
Docket Number: No. 13-84-038-CR
Parties: James M. LASSITER and Jonathan Lawrence Berg, Appellants, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.
Judges: Before NYE, C.J., and KENNEDY and SEERDEN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 672
Pages: 632–633

Head Matter:
James M. LASSITER and Jonathan Lawrence Berg, Appellants, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.
No. 13-84-038-CR.
Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi.
June 7, 1984.
Carl E. Lewis, Tinker, Tor & Brown, Corpus Christi, for appellants.
Richard Hatch, County Atty., Sinton, for appellee.
Before NYE, C.J., and KENNEDY and SEERDEN, JJ.

Opinion:
OPINION
NYE, Chief Justice.
Appellants seek to appeal from orders deferring adjudication and placing them on probation for six months. Both appellants were charged with possessing less than two ounces of marihuana.
As noted in McDougal v. State, 610 S.W.2d 509 (Tex.Crim.App.1981), there is no appellate review from an order deferring adjudication. If the accused is dissatisfied with the decision to defer adjudication or with the terms and conditions of the order, his proper remedy is to move for final adjudication under Art. 42.12 or 42.13 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Appellant argued during submission that he should be allowed an appeal under TEX.CODE CRIM.PROC.ANN. art. 44.02 (Vernon Supp.1984). We disagree. Art. 44.02 allows a defendant to appeal his guilty-plea conviction under certain limited circumstances. Where adjudication is deferred as in this case, there has been no conviction. Ex parte Shillings, 641 S.W.2d 538 (Tex.Crim.App.1982). Thus, art. 44.02 is inapplicable.
Without a final adjudication of guilt, this Court lacks jurisdiction to consider the appeal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.