Case Name: Joseph P. PNIEWSKI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Marjorie MARTORELLA, individually and in her official capacity as special prosecutor of Wayne County; Wayne County Commission; West Virginia Prosecuting Attorneys, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-12-01
Citations: 155 F. App'x 718
Docket Number: No. 05-1475
Parties: Joseph P. PNIEWSKI, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Marjorie MARTORELLA, individually and in her official capacity as special prosecutor of Wayne County; Wayne County Commission; West Virginia Prosecuting Attorneys, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 155
Pages: 718–719

Head Matter:
Joseph P. PNIEWSKI, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Marjorie MARTORELLA, individually and in her official capacity as special prosecutor of Wayne County; Wayne County Commission; West Virginia Prosecuting Attorneys, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 05-1475.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 22, 2005.
Decided: Dec. 1, 2005.
Joseph P. Pniewski, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Gregory McNeer, Campbell, Woods, Bagley, Emerson, McNeer & Herndon, Huntington, West Virginia; Matthew Albert Kelly, Huntington, West Virginia; Steven Kenneth Nord, David E. Rich, Offutt, Fisher & Nord, Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Joseph P. Pniewski seeks to appeal the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation and dismissing the West Virginia Prosecuting Attorneys Institute from the case, dismissing all claims against Marjorie Martorella in her official capacity, and dismissing the federal claims against Martorella in her individual capacity. The case is proceeding on Pniewski's state law claims against Martorella in her individual capacity and his claims against the Wayne County Commission.
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders. 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Pniewski seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED