Case Name: UNITED STATES v. TIFFANY & CO.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1910-04-04
Citations: 178 F. 1006
Docket Number: No. 184 (5,454)
Parties: UNITED STATES v. TIFFANY & CO.
Judges: Before WARD, and NOYES,. Circuit Judges, and HOLT, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter
Volume: 178
Pages: 1006–1006

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES v. TIFFANY & CO.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
April 4, 1910.
On Petition for Rehearing, June 6, 1910.)
No. 184 (5,454).
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the JDnited States for the Southern District of New York.
For decision below, see 172 Fed. 300, affirming a decision by the Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 6.864 (T. D. 29,542), which had reversed the assessment of duty by the collector of customs at the port of New York.
D. Frank Lloyd, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Charles Duane Baker, Sp. Atty., of counsel), for the United States. Arthur M. King, for. appellees.
Before WARD, and NOYES,. Circuit Judges, and HOLT, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We come to the same conclusion in this case as in our former decision in Citroen v. U. S., 92 C. C. A. 365, 166 Fed. 693. Judgment affirmed.