Case Name: David YI, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Joseph BROOKS, Warden; United States of America, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-11-17
Citations: 80 F. App'x 874
Docket Number: No. 03-6969
Parties: David YI, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Joseph BROOKS, Warden; United States of America, Respondents—Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 80
Pages: 874–875

Head Matter:
David YI, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Joseph BROOKS, Warden; United States of America, Respondents—Appellees.
No. 03-6969.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 29, 2003.
Decided Nov. 17, 2003.
David Yi, pro se.
Mary Hannah Lauck, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
David Yi appeals the district court's order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Yi v. Brooks, No. CA-03-385-3 (E.D. Va. filed June 10, 2003 & entered June 11, 2003). We deny Yi's motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED