Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. RAFAEL PALMA, Appellant; STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. RAFAEL RUELAS PALMA, aka Manuel Palma-Ruelas, aka Daniel Moreno, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1992-02-12
Citations: 111 Or. App. 388
Docket Number: 9006-33564; CA A68629; 9006-33851; CA A68630
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. RAFAEL PALMA, Appellant. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. RAFAEL RUELAS PALMA, aka Manuel Palma-Ruelas, aka Daniel Moreno, Appellant.
Judges: Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Joseph, Chief Judge, and Deits, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 111
Pages: 388–389

Head Matter:
Submitted on record and briefs November 6, 1991,
convictions affirmed and remanded for resentencing February 12, 1992
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. RAFAEL PALMA, Appellant. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. RAFAEL RUELAS PALMA, aka Manuel Palma-Ruelas, aka Daniel Moreno, Appellant.
(9006-33564; CA A68629 (Control))
(9006-33851; CA A68630)
(Cases Consolidated)
823 P2d 1040
Sally L. Avera, Public Defender and J. Marvin Kuhn, Chief Deputy Public Defender, Salem, filed the brief for appéllant.
Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Joseph, Chief Judge, and Deits, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant was convicted, after trial to the court, of delivery of controlled substances. ORS 475.992. The indictments included allegations that delivery occurred as part of a drug cultivation, manufacture or delivery scheme or network. Defendant challenges only his sentence, and the state concedes that the sentence was improper and that the case should be remanded for resentencing. State v. Moeller, 105 Or App 434, 806 P2d 130, rev dismissed 312 Or 76, 815 P2d 701 (1991). We accept that concession.
Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing.