Case Name: Peter O. Eisenlord, Appellant v. Maggie Dillenback, as Administratrix, etc., et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1879-11-25
Citations: 79 N.Y. 617
Docket Number: 
Parties: Peter O. Eisenlord, Appellant v. Maggie Dillenback, as Administratrix, etc., et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 79
Pages: 617–618

Head Matter:
Peter O. Eisenlord, Appellant v. Maggie Dillenback, as Administratrix, etc., et al., Respondents.
(Argued November 18, 1879;
decided November 25, 1879.)
Reported below, 15 Hun, 23.
J. H. Cools for appellant.
_ZV C. Moalc for respondents.

Opinion:
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur, except Church, Ch. J., audRAPALLO J., dissenting, being for reversal on the ground that the indorse ment of past due paper creates an absolute liability ; but it is conceded that The current of authorities is to the effect that in such a case a demand within a reasonable time is necessary.
Judgment affirmed.