Case Name: Marian O. DURHAM, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Mary MITCHELL, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-06-24
Citations: 282 F. App'x 238
Docket Number: No. 08-6295
Parties: Marian O. DURHAM, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Mary MITCHELL, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 282
Pages: 238–238

Head Matter:
Marian O. DURHAM, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Mary MITCHELL, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 08-6295.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 19, 2008.
Decided: June 24, 2008.
Marian O. Durham, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Marian O. Durham seeks to appeal the district court's order transferring her petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) to the district court for the Middle District of Florida. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Durham seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See In re Carefirst of Md., Inc., 305 F.3d 253, 255, 262 (4th Cir.2002); Gower v. Lehman, 799 F.2d 925, 927 (4th Cir.1986). Accordingly, we deny Durham's motion to expedite and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.