Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lester Henry ROBINSON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-04-20
Citations: 129 F. App'x 102
Docket Number: No. 04-10237
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lester Henry ROBINSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before JONES, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 129
Pages: 102–103

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lester Henry ROBINSON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 04-10237.
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Decided April 20, 2005.
Angie Lee Henson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Fort Worth, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Lester Henry Robinson Terre Haute, IN, pro se.
Before JONES, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
In 1993, Lester Henry Robinson, federal prisoner #23967-077, was convicted following a guilty plea of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute at least 5 kilograms of cocaine and at least 50 kilograms of cocaine base (crack) and sentenced to a life term of imprisonment. Robinson appeals the district court's dismissal, for lack of jurisdiction, of his Fed. R.CrimP. 35(a) motion, challenging the drug quantity attributable to him for sentencing purposes and his life term of imprisonment.
Contrary to Robinson's argument, because Robinson's conspiracy offense continued well after November 1, 1987, the version of Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a) applicable to offenses committed after that date applies. Cf. United States v. White, 869 F.2d 822, 826 (5th Cir.1989) (holding that the Sentencing Guidelines, effective November 1,1987, applied to case in which conspiracy offense continued after effective date of the Guidelines). Because Robinson's Fed. R.CrimP. 35(a) motion was not filed within seven days of sentencing, the district court properly dismissed the motion for lack of jurisdiction. See Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a); United States v. Lopez, 26 F.3d 512, 518-20 & n. 8 (5th Cir.1994).
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.