Case Name: Roosevelt LIVINGSTON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2015-10-06
Citations: 471 S.W.3d 804
Docket Number: No. ED 102457
Parties: Roosevelt LIVINGSTON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Patricia L. Cohen, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 471
Pages: 804–804

Head Matter:
Roosevelt LIVINGSTON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 102457
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
Filed: October 6, 2015
Matthew W. Huckeby, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Movant/Appellant.
Mary Highland Moore, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent/Respondent.
Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Patricia L. Cohen, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Roosevelt Livingston appeals from the motion court's judgment denying, after an evidentiary hearing, his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and-Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.15. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. 2013, unless otherwise indicated.