Case Name: Cicero Lewis, Plaintiff in Error, vs. State of Florida, Defendant in Error
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1933-01-09
Citations: 107 Fla. 614
Docket Number: 
Parties: Cicero Lewis, Plaintiff in Error, vs. State of Florida, Defendant in Error.
Judges: Buford, C.J.,and Whitfield, Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 107
Pages: 614–615

Head Matter:
Cicero Lewis, Plaintiff in Error, vs. State of Florida, Defendant in Error.
145 So. 837.
Decision filed January 9, 1933.
W. A. Bothar and E. S. Corlett, Jr., for Plaintiff in Error;
Cary D. Landis, Attorney General, and Boy Campbell, Assistant, for the State.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Buford, C.J.,and Whitfield, Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.
Brown, J.
I think this writ of error should be dismissed. The Clerk's certificate does not cover the en tire transcript, and plaintiff in error's brief utterly fails to comply with Rule 20.