Case Name: Harry Tiedeck, complainant-respondent, v. Hamilton G. Pedrick, defendant-appellant
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1937-04-30
Citations: 122 N.J. Eq. 20
Docket Number: 
Parties: Harry Tiedeck, complainant-respondent, v. Hamilton G. Pedrick, defendant-appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 122
Pages: 20–24

Head Matter:
Harry Tiedeck, complainant-respondent, v. Hamilton G. Pedrick, defendant-appellant.
[Decided April 30th, 1937.]
Mr. Waller 8. Keown and Mr. George D. Bothermel, for the complainant-respondent.
Mr. James Mercer Davis, for the defendant-appellant.

Opinion:
Pee Cueiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court of chancery by Vice-Chancellor Dayis.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Teefchaed, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Pebskie, Hetfield, Deak, Wells, WolfsKeil, Raffeety, JJ. 11.
For reversal — Pakkek, Case, Hehee, Cole, JJ. 4.