Case Name: Kingsley ANYANWUTAKU, Appellant v. AMERICAN FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK, et al., Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-03-26
Citations: 219 F. App'x 9
Docket Number: Nos. 04-7197, 06-7100
Parties: Kingsley ANYANWUTAKU, Appellant v. AMERICAN FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK, et al., Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 219
Pages: 9–10

Head Matter:
Kingsley ANYANWUTAKU, Appellant v. AMERICAN FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK, et al., Appellees.
Nos. 04-7197, 06-7100.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
March 26, 2007.
Rehearing En Banc Denied June 28, 2007.
Kingsley Anyanwutaku, Washington, DC, pro se.
Steven Kent White, Stinson Morrison Hecker LLP, Washington, DC, for Appel-lees.
BEFORE: GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and GRIFFITH and KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's orders denying appellant's motions to vacate be affirmed. The district court did not abuse its discretion, see Murray v. District of Columbia, 52 F.3d 353, 354 (D.C.Cir.1995), in denying appellant's motions to vacate judgment filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b), on the ground that appellant's claims concerning his counsel do not meet that Rule's requirements.
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.