Case Name: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mascio
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2000-03-29
Citations: 88 Ohio St. 3d 324
Docket Number: No. 99-1865
Parties: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mascio.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundbeug Stratton, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 88
Pages: 324–325

Head Matter:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mascio.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Mascio (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 324.]
(No. 99-1865
Submitted December 1, 1999
Decided March 29, 2000.)
Jonathan E. Coughlan, Disciplinary Counsel, and Kenneth R. Donchatz, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.
J. Craig Wright and Kirk A. Lindsey, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We adopt the findings, conclusion, and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs are taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundbeug Stratton, JJ., concur.
Douglas, J., concurs in judgment only.