Case Name: STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Darrell Shawn SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.
Court: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2018-11-28
Citations: 430 P.3d 228
Docket Number: A159185
Parties: STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Darrell Shawn SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Tookey, Judge, and Shorr, Judge.
Reporter: Pacific Reporter 3d
Volume: 430
Pages: 228–228

Head Matter:
STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Darrell Shawn SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.
A159185
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
November 28, 2018
Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Stacy M. Du Clos, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, for petition.
Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Tookey, Judge, and Shorr, Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant seeks reconsideration of our decision in State v. Smith , 292 Or. App. 335, 424 P.3d 755 (2018), in which we reversed defendant's conviction for unlawful possession of cocaine. We reversed the conviction on the ground that the trial court had applied an incorrect legal standard in ruling on defendant's suppression motion, and we remanded the case for the court to decide the suppression motion under the correct standard. Id. at 340-41, 424 P.3d 755.
Defendant contends in his reconsideration petition that we erred in our disposition of his appeal because we failed to properly account for the fact that his conviction was based on a conditional guilty plea under ORS 135.335(3). In his view, the proper disposition was for us to direct the trial court to allow defendant to withdraw his guilty plea and for the court to reconsider defendant's suppression motion under the correct legal standard if defendant withdraws his plea. We agree with defendant and modify our opinion accordingly.
Reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified and adhered to as modified.