Case Name: Toledo Bar Association v. Doyle
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1991-06-05
Citations: 60 Ohio St. 3d 106
Docket Number: No. 90-2082
Parties: Toledo Bar Association v. Doyle.
Judges: Sweeney, Douglas, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 60
Pages: 106–107

Head Matter:
Toledo Bar Association v. Doyle.
[Cite as Toledo Bar Assn. v. Doyle (1991), 60 Ohio St. 3d 106.]
(No. 90-2082 —
Submitted January 8, 1991 —
Decided June 5, 1991.)
Frank E. Kane, Dale W. Fallat and John N. MaoKay, for relator.
C. Allen McConnell, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We concur with the findings of the board; however, we modify the sanction. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Sweeney, Douglas, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Moyer, C.J., Holmes and Wright, JJ., dissent.