Case Name: Pauline Sherling, Respondent, v. Gallatin Improvement Co., Inc., et al., Defendants, and Jacob Bakrat et al., Appellants; Louis Sherling et al., Respondents, v. Gallatin Improvement Co., Inc., et al., Defendants, and Jacob Bakrat et al., Appellants
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1933-10-10
Citations: 262 N.Y. 641
Docket Number: 
Parties: Pauline Sherling, Respondent, v. Gallatin Improvement Co., Inc., et al., Defendants, and Jacob Bakrat et al., Appellants. Louis Sherling et al., Respondents, v. Gallatin Improvement Co., Inc., et al., Defendants, and Jacob Bakrat et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 262
Pages: 641–642

Head Matter:
Pauline Sherling, Respondent, v. Gallatin Improvement Co., Inc., et al., Defendants, and Jacob Bakrat et al., Appellants. Louis Sherling et al., Respondents, v. Gallatin Improvement Co., Inc., et al., Defendants, and Jacob Bakrat et al., Appellants.
(Submitted October 2, 1933;
decided October 10, 1933.)
Abraham Miller for motions.
No one opposed.

Opinion:
Motions granted and appeals dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion.