Case Name: Jack HATCHER, Employer, and Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Company, Carrier, Petitioners, v. William BANFIELD, Employee, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1964-05-13
Citations: 162 So. 2d 518
Docket Number: No. 33364
Parties: Jack HATCHER, Employer, and Lumbermen’s Mutual Casualty Company, Carrier, Petitioners, v. William BANFIELD, Employee, Respondent.
Judges: DREW, C. J., and THORNAL, O’CON-NELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 162
Pages: 518–518

Head Matter:
Jack HATCHER, Employer, and Lumbermen’s Mutual Casualty Company, Carrier, Petitioners, v. William BANFIELD, Employee, Respondent.
No. 33364.
Supreme Court of Florida.
May 13, 1964.
W. Robert Mann (of Knowles, Knowles & Mann), Bradenton, for petitioners.
B. Clarke Nichols (of Smith, Carroll, Vega, Brown & Nichols), Naples, for William Banfield.
Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for Florida Industrial Commission, respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date January 27, 1964.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.
DREW, C. J., and THORNAL, O'CON-NELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.