Case Name: BELLSOUTH ADVERTISING & PUBLISHING CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee, v. DONNELLY INFORMATION PUBLISHING, INC. and the Reuben H. Donnelly Corp., Defendants-Counterclaim Plaintiffs-Appellants, Bellsouth Corporation, et al., Counterclaim Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1992-11-04
Citations: 977 F.2d 1435
Docket Number: No. 89-5131
Parties: BELLSOUTH ADVERTISING & PUBLISHING CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee, v. DONNELLY INFORMATION PUBLISHING, INC. and the Reuben H. Donnelly Corp., Defendants-Counterclaim Plaintiffs-Appellants, Bellsouth Corporation, et al., Counterclaim Defendants.
Judges: Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, HATCHETT, EDMONDSON, BIRCH, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 977
Pages: 1435–1436

Head Matter:
BELLSOUTH ADVERTISING & PUBLISHING CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee, v. DONNELLY INFORMATION PUBLISHING, INC. and the Reuben H. Donnelly Corp., Defendants-Counterclaim Plaintiffs-Appellants, Bellsouth Corporation, et al., Counterclaim Defendants.
No. 89-5131.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Nov. 4, 1992.
Douglas C. Broeker, Michael J. Cappucio, Fowler, White, Burnett, Hurley, Banick & Strickroot, Miami, Fla., David L. Foster, Theodore Case Whitehouse, Francis J. Men-ton, Jr., Willkie, Farr & Gallager, Baila H. Celedonia, Roger L. Zissu, Cowan, Liebow-itz & Latman, P.C., New York City, for appellants.
Robert E. Richards, Anthony B. Askew, Jones, Askew & Lunsford, Atlanta, Ga., for BellSouth Advertising.
John K. Roedel, Jr., Senniger, Powers, Leavitt & Roedel, St. Louis, Mo., for ami-cus ANADP.
Robert E. Marsh, Blackwell, Sanders, Matheny, Weary & Lombardi, Kansas City, Mo., for amicus US West.
Robert Alan Garrett, Arnold & Porter, Washington, D.C., for amicus Bell Atlantic.
Judges Phyllis A. Kravitch, R. Lanier Anderson, III, Emmett R. Cox and Joel F. Dubina have recused themselves and will not participate.

Opinion:
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, HATCHETT, EDMONDSON, BIRCH, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.