Case Name: Brandon RICHMOND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2014-03-19
Citations: 137 So. 3d 463
Docket Number: No. 4D13-878
Parties: Brandon RICHMOND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: STEVENSON, GROSS and FORST, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 137
Pages: 463–464

Head Matter:
Brandon RICHMOND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D13-878.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
March 19, 2014.
Brandon Richmond, Arcadia, pro se.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and James J. Carney, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court's denial of appellant's rule 3.800(a) motion seeking additional jail credit. The motion sought jail credit from the date a hold was placed on him for the violation of probation (VOP) in this case. This claim is without merit. See Gethers v. State, 838 So.2d 504, 508 (Fla.2003). Defendant did not establish that the face of the record showed when the VOP warrant was transmitted or executed. Affirmance is without prejudice for petitioner to file a legally sufficient motion seeking additional jail credit within the time permitted by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801(b). See Amador v. State, 112 So.3d 570, 571 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).
STEVENSON, GROSS and FORST, JJ., concur.