Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Kareem MUHAMMAD, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2009-09-22
Citations: 292 S.W.3d 608
Docket Number: No. ED 91654
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Kareem MUHAMMAD, Appellant.
Judges: Before KENNETH M. ROMINES, C.J., KURT S. ODENWALD, P.J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 292
Pages: 608–608

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Kareem MUHAMMAD, Appellant.
No. ED 91654.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Sept. 22, 2009.
Gwenda R. Robinson, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, Karen L. Kramer, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before KENNETH M. ROMINES, C.J., KURT S. ODENWALD, P.J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Kareem Muhammad (hereinafter, "Appellant") appeals from the trial court's judgment after a jury convicted him of two counts of first degree child molestation, Section 566.067 RSMo (2000). Appellant was sentenced to seven years' imprisonment on each count, to run concurrently. In his sole point on appeal, Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain one of his convictions.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcript on appeal. We find no error of law. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion, only for the use of the parties, setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).