Case Name: Craig Lawrence RICKERT, Appellant, v. Keith Eugene TOMAT and Line Lilaberte, his wife, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1999-04-14
Citations: 732 So. 2d 414
Docket Number: No. 98-422
Parties: Craig Lawrence RICKERT, Appellant, v. Keith Eugene TOMAT and Line Lilaberte, his wife, Appellees.
Judges: Before JORGENSON, GERSTEN, and SORONDO, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 732
Pages: 414–415

Head Matter:
Craig Lawrence RICKERT, Appellant, v. Keith Eugene TOMAT and Line Lilaberte, his wife, Appellees.
No. 98-422.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 14, 1999.
Rehearing Denied May 19, 1999.
Sparkman, Robb, Mason & Ginsburg, and James T. Sparkman (Fort Lauder-dale), for appellant.
Deutsch & Blumberg, and James C. Blecke, Miami, for appellees.
Before JORGENSON, GERSTEN, and SORONDO, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We agree that the jury's causation finding was against the manifest weight of the evidence and affirm the trial court's order granting a new trial on the issue of damages. See Bach v. Murray, 658 So.2d 546 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). The new trial is to be geared toward resolving all damages issues.
Affirmed with directions.