Case Name: Joseph Michael LADEAIROUS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Eddie PEARSON, Warden of Sussex I Correctional Center, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-01-28
Citations: 553 F. App'x 298
Docket Number: No. 13-7861
Parties: Joseph Michael LADEAIROUS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Eddie PEARSON, Warden of Sussex I Correctional Center, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 553
Pages: 298–299

Head Matter:
Joseph Michael LADEAIROUS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Eddie PEARSON, Warden of Sussex I Correctional Center, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 13-7861.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 23, 2014.
Decided: Jan. 28, 2014.
Joseph Michael Ladeairous, Appellant Pro Se. Kate Elizabeth Dwyre, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Joseph Michael Ladeairous appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012) for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ladeairous v. Pearson, No. 3:12-cv-00807-JAG, 2013 WL 5962932 (E.D.Va. Nov. 6, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.