Case Name: Phyllis Cafiero et al., Appellants, v. Inserra Supermarkets, Inc., Doing Business as Shoprite of Haverstraw, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1993-10-14
Citations: 82 N.Y.2d 787
Docket Number: 
Parties: Phyllis Cafiero et al., Appellants, v Inserra Supermarkets, Inc., Doing Business as Shoprite of Haverstraw, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 82
Pages: 787–788

Head Matter:
[624 NE2d 686, 604 NYS2d 549]
Phyllis Cafiero et al., Appellants, v Inserra Supermarkets, Inc., Doing Business as Shoprite of Haverstraw, Respondent.
Decided October 14, 1993
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Jeffery M. Adams, New City, for appellants.
O’Connor, McGuinness, Conte, Doyle, Oleson & Collins, White Plains (Montgomery L. Effnger of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (195 AD2d 681).
Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Hancock, Jr., Bellacosa, Smith and Levine.