Case Name: Samuel Douglas PITTS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1982-11-16
Citations: 421 So. 2d 791
Docket Number: No. AN-302
Parties: Samuel Douglas PITTS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SHAW and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 421
Pages: 791–791

Head Matter:
Samuel Douglas PITTS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. AN-302.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nov. 16, 1982.
Samuel Douglas Pitts, pro se, appellant.
No appearance for appellee.

Opinion:
JOANOS, Judge.
In a motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850, appellant sought to challenge the effectiveness of assistance of counsel and the extent of the inquiry into his sanity. The motion was properly denied summarily as to these issues, because it consisted of mere concluso-ry allegations lacking adequate statements of factual support.
The issue of improper prosecutorial comment, also stated in mere conclusory terms, could have been raised on direct appeal and will not be reviewed in this collateral proceeding. See Adams v. State, 380 So.2d 423 (Fla.1980).
AFFIRMED.
SHAW and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.