Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. ALLEN MARK MOEN, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1990-05-09
Citations: 101 Or. App. 516
Docket Number: 89C-20682; CA A61080
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. ALLEN MARK MOEN, Appellant.
Judges: Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Warren and Rossman, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 101
Pages: 516–517

Head Matter:
Submitted on record and briefs February 1,
affirmed May 9, 1990
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. ALLEN MARK MOEN, Appellant.
(89C-20682; CA A61080)
791 P2d 503
Allen M. Moen, Salem, filed the brief pro se for appellant.
Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Vera Langer, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Warren and Rossman, Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant appeals his conviction for assault in the second degree on the ground that the trial court did not orally give him all of the advice required by ORS 135.385(2) before accepting his guilty plea. He argues that the court's error, in effect, nullified his conviction, making the voluntariness of his guilty plea an appealable issue. That issue was decided adversely to defendant in State v. Clevenger, 297 Or 234, 683 P2d 1360 (1984).
Defendant also challenges the length of his sentence, arguing that the trial court sentenced him "on the basis of past crimes and unprosecuted crimes." That contention has no merit.
Affirmed.