Case Name: S.E.K. b/n/f P.A.M. and P.A.M., Individually, Appellants, v. L.A.W., Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1993-09-07
Citations: 860 S.W.2d 398
Docket Number: No. 62867
Parties: S.E.K. b/n/f P.A.M. and P.A.M., Individually, Appellants, v. L.A.W., Respondent.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, C.J., and REINHARD and PUDLOWSKI, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 860
Pages: 398–399

Head Matter:
S.E.K. b/n/f P.A.M. and P.A.M., Individually, Appellants, v. L.A.W., Respondent.
No. 62867.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Sept. 7, 1993.
Thomas L. Hoeh, Perryville, for appellants.
Francis J. Toohey, Jr., Perryville, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, C.J., and REINHARD and PUDLOWSKI, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellants, S.E.K., by her Next Friend P.A.M., and P.A.M. individually, appeal from an order of the Circuit Court of Perry County, Missouri, limiting past child support from respondent, L.A.W., to actual medical expenses proven at trial. We affirm.
The order of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of evidence. In addition, no error of law appears. As we find an opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the trial court's order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our holding.