Case Name: Linville v. Golding
Court: Supreme Court of Indiana
Jurisdiction: Indiana
Decision Date: 1858-12-16
Citations: 11 Ind. 374
Docket Number: 
Parties: Linville v. Golding.
Judges: 
Reporter: Indiana Reports
Volume: 11
Pages: 374–375

Head Matter:
Linville v. Golding.
Thursday, December 16.
APPEAL from the Shelby Court of Common Pleas.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Counsel for appellant present but one point, which is upon the ruling of the Court on a motion, &c., to continue. The affidavit presented appears to be in accordance with the provision of the statute, § 322, 2 R. S. p. 108. Upon that affidavit a continuance should have been granted.
M. M. Ray and T. A. McFarland, for the appellant.
The record states that the continuance was refused on the counter-affidavit of the plaintiff. Counter-affidavits should not have been received.
The judgment is reversed with costs.