Case Name: James Guy ARNOLD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Sheriff MADES; Martin Van Evans, Lieutenant, Warden, Respondents-Appellees; James Guy Arnold, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles Mades; Martin Van Evans; Washington County Sheriff's Department; Attorney General for the State of Maryland; M. Kenneth Long, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-03-06
Citations: 30 F. App'x 202
Docket Number: Nos. 01-7964, 01-8094
Parties: James Guy ARNOLD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Sheriff MADES; Martin Van Evans, Lieutenant, Warden, Respondents-Appellees. James Guy Arnold, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles Mades; Martin Van Evans; Washington County Sheriff’s Department; Attorney General for the State of Maryland; M. Kenneth Long, Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINS, DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 30
Pages: 202–203

Head Matter:
James Guy ARNOLD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Sheriff MADES; Martin Van Evans, Lieutenant, Warden, Respondents-Appellees. James Guy Arnold, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles Mades; Martin Van Evans; Washington County Sheriff’s Department; Attorney General for the State of Maryland; M. Kenneth Long, Respondents-Appellees.
Nos. 01-7964, 01-8094.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 21, 2002.
Decided March 6, 2002.
James Guy Arnold, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINS, DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
James Guy Arnold appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition in these consolidated cases. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. See Arnold v. Mades, Nos. CA-01-2347-AMD & CA-01-3087-AMD (D. Md. Nov. 2 & 6, 2001 and filed Nov. 27; entered Nov. 29, 2001). We deny Arnold's motion for emergency action in No. 01-7964 and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.