Case Name: Danta DAVIS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dennis STRAUB, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-04-21
Citations: 445 F.3d 908
Docket Number: No. 03-2262
Parties: Danta DAVIS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dennis STRAUB, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before: MERRITT and ROGERS, Circuit Judges; HOOD, Chief District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 445
Pages: 908–913

Head Matter:
Danta DAVIS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dennis STRAUB, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 03-2262.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
April 21, 2006.
John R. Minock, Cramer & Minock, Ann Arbor, MI, for Petitioner-Appellant.
Janet A. Van Cleve, Office of the Attorney General, Lansing, MI, for RespondenL-Appellee.
Before: MERRITT and ROGERS, Circuit Judges; HOOD, Chief District Judge.
The Honorable Joseph M. Hood, Chief United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
AMENDED ORDER
This matter comes before the court upon the petition for rehearing en bane, filed by counsel for the appellant, and the response of the appellee thereto. The petition has been circulated not only to the original panel members but also to all other judges of the court in regular active service, less than a majority of whom have voted in favor of rehearing en banc. Accordingly, the petition has been returned to the panel for decision.
Upon consideration of the petition and the response, the panel concludes that the issues raised therein were fully considered upon the original submission and decision of the case, and the request for rehearing is therefore denied.