Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Earl E. RICHARDSON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-12-17
Citations: 356 F. App'x 663
Docket Number: No. 09-7418
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Earl E. RICHARDSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 356
Pages: 663–663

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Earl E. RICHARDSON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-7418.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 10, 2009.
Decided: Dec. 17, 2009.
Earl E. Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Earl E. Richardson appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Richardson, No. 3:96-cr-00122-JRS-l (E.D.Va. July 2, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.