Case Name: Gloria SCHAAD, Appellant, v. FRISK CORPORATION, N.V., a foreign corporation, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-10-20
Citations: 605 So. 2d 1027
Docket Number: No. 92-355
Parties: Gloria SCHAAD, Appellant, v. FRISK CORPORATION, N.V., a foreign corporation, Appellee.
Judges: Before JORGENSON, LEVY and GODERICH, ■ JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 605
Pages: 1027–1027

Head Matter:
Gloria SCHAAD, Appellant, v. FRISK CORPORATION, N.V., a foreign corporation, Appellee.
No. 92-355.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 20, 1992.
Kenney, Burd, Knutson & Markowitz, William G. Burd and Arthur R. Brown, Jr., Miami, for appellant.
Richard A. Sherman and Rosemary B. Wilder, Fort Lauderdale, Stephens, Lynn, Klein & McNicholas and Karen A. Brim-mer, Miami, for appellee.
Before JORGENSON, LEVY and GODERICH, ■ JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
There was competent substantial evidence to support the jury's verdict. Therefore, we reverse the trial court's order granting the defendant's motion for judgment non obstante veredicto and reinstate the jury's verdict in favor of the plaintiff. See Stirling v. Sapp, 229 So.2d 850 (Fla.1969); United Farm Agency of Fla., Inc. v. DKLS, Inc., 560 So.2d 1212 (Fla.3d DCA 1990).
Reversed.