Case Name: In the Interest of S.F.B., a minor. S.B. Appellant, v. Juvenile Officers of St. Louis County, Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-05-16
Citations: 17 S.W.3d 613
Docket Number: No. ED 76111
Parties: In the Interest of S.F.B., a minor. S.B. Appellant, v. Juvenile Officers of St. Louis County, Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before MARY RHODES RUSSELL, C.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., CHARLES B. BLACKMAR, Sr. J.,
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 17
Pages: 613–613

Head Matter:
In the Interest of S.F.B., a minor. S.B. Appellant, v. Juvenile Officers of St. Louis County, Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 76111.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
May 16, 2000.
Dudley C. Dunlop, Clayton, for appellant.
Nancy J. Pew, Family Court of St. Louis County, Clayton, for respondent.
Before MARY RHODES RUSSELL, C.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., CHARLES B. BLACKMAR, Sr. J.,

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
S.B. ("Father") appeals the judgment terminating his parental rights to his minor child. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the judgment is supported by substantial, clear, cogent and convincing evidence, is riot against the weight of the evidence and does not erroneously declare or misapply the law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties "with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).