Case Name: SIEDER v. JEROME
Court: Michigan Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Michigan
Decision Date: 1932-04-04
Citations: 258 Mich. 249
Docket Number: Docket No. 37, Calendar No. 36,085
Parties: SIEDER v. JEROME.
Judges: Clark, C. J., and McDonald, Potter, Sharpe, North, Wiest, and Butzel, JJ., concurred.
Reporter: Michigan Reports
Volume: 258
Pages: 249–250

Head Matter:
SIEDER v. JEROME.
Bills and Notes — Dishonor—Notice.
In action on promissory note, where testimony shows that indorser was given notice of dishonor, as required by statute (2 Comp. Laws 1929, § 9338), judgment for plaintiff is affirmed, on appeal by indorser.
Appeal from Wayne; Lamb (Fred S.), J., presiding.
Submitted January 6, 1932.
(Docket No. 37, Calendar No. 36,085.)
Decided April 4, 1932.
Assumpsit by Charles P. Sieder against George Jerome and others on a promissory note. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant Jerome appeals.
Affirmed.
Y erices, Goddard & McGlintock (G. Upton Shreve and F. W. Donovan, of counsel), for plaintiff.
James B. Van Vediten, Jr. (Edmund J. Stafford, of counsel), for defendant Jerome.

Opinion:
Fead, J.
In this action on a promissory note, as the testimony shows that the indorser, Jerome, was given notice of dishonor, as required by statute (2 Comp. Laws 1929, § 9338), judgment for plaintiff is affirmed, with costs.
Clark, C. J., and McDonald, Potter, Sharpe, North, Wiest, and Butzel, JJ., concurred.