Case Name: Marjorie Manganello, Appellant, v. Samuel R. Sherman, Also Known as S. Richard Sherman, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1984-10-22
Citations: 104 A.D.2d 973
Docket Number: 
Parties: Marjorie Manganello, Appellant, v Samuel R. Sherman, Also Known as S. Richard Sherman, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 104
Pages: 973–973

Head Matter:
Marjorie Manganello, Appellant, v Samuel R. Sherman, Also Known as S. Richard Sherman, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Marbach, J.), dated September 20, 1983, affirmed, with one bill of costs. (See Nussbaum v Lacopo, 27 NY2d 311, 319; PJI 2:12.) Lazer, J. P., Thompson, Weinstein and Eiber, JJ., concur.