Case Name: Jerry L. OLIVER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. V. GRAY, Opt. Officer; Thomas, Grievance Coor.; Giles, c/o; Stoots, Sgt.; Sergeant Lynchard; Myers, Captain; Ms. C. Matthews, T.P.S.; Dillman, Warden; Ms. Crowder-Austin, Regional Ombudsman; Coleman, c/o; Reeves, c/o; Andrew J. Gibbs; Fountain, c/o; Mr. Giles; Howard Bruce Schneider, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-01-06
Citations: 360 F. App'x 417
Docket Number: No. 09-6431
Parties: Jerry L. OLIVER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. V. GRAY, Opt. Officer; Thomas, Grievance Coor.; Giles, c/o; Stoots, Sgt.; Sergeant Lynchard; Myers, Captain; Ms. C. Matthews, T.P.S.; Dillman, Warden; Ms. Crowder-Austin, Regional Ombudsman; Coleman, c/o; Reeves, c/o; Andrew J. Gibbs; Fountain, c/o; Mr. Giles; Howard Bruce Schneider, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 360
Pages: 417–417

Head Matter:
Jerry L. OLIVER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. V. GRAY, Opt. Officer; Thomas, Grievance Coor.; Giles, c/o; Stoots, Sgt.; Sergeant Lynchard; Myers, Captain; Ms. C. Matthews, T.P.S.; Dillman, Warden; Ms. Crowder-Austin, Regional Ombudsman; Coleman, c/o; Reeves, c/o; Andrew J. Gibbs; Fountain, c/o; Mr. Giles; Howard Bruce Schneider, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 09-6431.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 17, 2009.
Decided: Jan. 6, 2010.
Jerry L. Oliver, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jerry L. Oliver, a Virginia state prisoner, appeals the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action for failure to state a claim, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (b)(1) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. Oliver v. Gray, No. 7:09-cv00004-jct-mfu, 2009 WL 366150 (W.D.Va. Feb. 12, 2009). With regard to Oliver's claim of denial of access to the courts, we find that Oliver has failed to demonstrate that he suffered an actual injury because of the Defendants' actions; thus, his claim is not actionable. See Lewis v. Casey, 518 U.S. 343, 351-52, 116 S.Ct. 2174, 135 L.Ed.2d 606 (1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.