Case Name: Harvey J. King, Respondent, v. Oscar B. Arnold, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1881-03-22
Citations: 84 N.Y. 668
Docket Number: 
Parties: Harvey J. King, Respondent, v. Oscar B. Arnold, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 84
Pages: 668–669

Head Matter:
Harvey J. King, Respondent, v. Oscar B. Arnold, Appellant.
(Argued March 1, 1881;
decided March 22, 1881.)
This was an appeal from order of General Term, affirming an order which denied a motion to vacate an order of arrest herein.
The motion was made upon the same papers on which the order of arrest was granted.
The court say:
“ 1. The complaint contains causes of action which authorize an arrest under subdivision 8 of section 550 of the Code.
“ 2. The facts positively stated in the complaint and affidavit are sufficient to sustain the order of arrest. They were sufficient to give the county judge jurisdiction to grant the order; and with the exercise of his discretion we cannot interfere.”
J. W. Palmer for appellant.
LaMott W. Rhodes for respondent.

Opinion:
Per curiam
opinion for affirmance.
All concur.
Order affirmed.