Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Sharon BEAL, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-10-16
Citations: 489 F. App'x 784
Docket Number: No. 11-20892
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Sharon BEAL, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 489
Pages: 784–784

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Sharon BEAL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-20892
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Oct. 16, 2012.
Ellen R. Meltzer, Esq., Special Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Lourdes Rodriguez, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Sharon Beal has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Beal has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Beal's response. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th CiR. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cm. R. 47.5.4.