Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Quintin Eugene VAUGHT, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-02-03
Citations: 464 F. App'x 139
Docket Number: No. 11-7419
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Quintin Eugene VAUGHT, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 464
Pages: 139–139

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Quintin Eugene VAUGHT, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 11-7419.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 31, 2012.
Decided: Feb. 3, 2012.
Quinton Eugene Vaught, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina; Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Quintín Eugene Vaught appeals the district court's order denying Vaught's "Petition for Writ of Mandamus, Compelling Government to Specifically Perform Plea Agreement." We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Vaught, No. 4:08-cr-00375-RBH-1 (D.S.C. Oct. 5, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.