Case Name: Owen Franklin SILVIOUS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AFNI, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee, and Midland Credit Management Incorporated; Encore Capital Group, Incorporated; Account Services; Applied Card Bank; Credigy Receivables, Incorporated; Credit One Bank; Ltd Financial Services, LP, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-05-26
Citations: 432 F. App'x 192
Docket Number: No. 09-2164
Parties: Owen Franklin SILVIOUS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AFNI, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee, and Midland Credit Management Incorporated; Encore Capital Group, Incorporated; Account Services; Applied Card Bank; Credigy Receivables, Incorporated; Credit One Bank; Ltd Financial Services, LP, Defendants.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 432
Pages: 192–193

Head Matter:
Owen Franklin SILVIOUS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AFNI, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee, and Midland Credit Management Incorporated; Encore Capital Group, Incorporated; Account Services; Applied Card Bank; Credigy Receivables, Incorporated; Credit One Bank; Ltd Financial Services, LP, Defendants.
No. 09-2164.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 15, 2011.
Decided: May 26, 2011.
Owen Franklin Silvious, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Todd Booth, Booth & McCarthy, Bridgeport, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
ON REHEARING
PER CURIAM:
Owen Franklin Silvious appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant, and granting the motion to strike Silvious' surreply. Silvious also appeals the denial of his post-judgment motion for additional findings, filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(b). Following our grant of rehearing, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Silvious v. AFNI, Inc., No. 5:07-cv-00145-FPSJES (N.D. W. Va. Aug. 3, 2009; Sept. 4, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.