Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Antonio PETERSON, Appellant; Antonio PETERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1994-10-18
Citations: 885 S.W.2d 788
Docket Number: Nos. 62567, 65503
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Antonio PETERSON, Appellant. Antonio PETERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GRIMM, C.J., REINHARD, P.J., and CRAHAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 885
Pages: 788–789

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Antonio PETERSON, Appellant. Antonio PETERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 62567, 65503.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Oct. 18, 1994.
Henry B. Robertson, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Traci J. Sanders, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before GRIMM, C.J., REINHARD, P.J., and CRAHAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals the judgment upon his conviction by a jury of robbery in the first degree and armed criminal action. Defendant was sentenced to concurrent prison terms of twenty-five years and twenty years respectively. Defendant also appeals from an order denying, after an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. The appeals have been consolidated. We affirm.
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment and denial of post-conviction relief are affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).