Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Frank NORFLEET, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-05-31
Citations: 36 F. App'x 71
Docket Number: No. 01-4828
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Frank NORFLEET, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 36
Pages: 71–71

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Frank NORFLEET, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 01-4828.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 30, 2002.
Decided May 31, 2002.
A. Christopher Zaleski, Protogyroü & Rigney, P.L.C., Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellant. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney, Laura M. Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
William Frank Norfleet appeals the sentence imposed upon the revocation of his supervised release. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. The district court did not err in imposing a sentence above that recommended by U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 7B1.4(a), p.s. (2000). 18 U.S.C.A. § 3583(e)(3), (g) (West 2000); see generally United States v. Davis, 53 F.3d 638, 640-41 & nn. 1, 6, 10 (4th Cir.1995). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Norfleet, No. CR-90-104 (E.D.Va. Oct. 16, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.