Case Name: Glenn HOLT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-08-28
Citations: 374 S.W.3d 399
Docket Number: No. ED 96366
Parties: Glenn HOLT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J., and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 374
Pages: 399–399

Head Matter:
Glenn HOLT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 96366.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Aug. 28, 2012.
Jo Ann Rotermund, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J., and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Glenn Holt, (Movant) appeals from the motion court's denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 24.035. Movant contends the motion court erred in finding the State met its burden to prove Movant was a prior and persistent offender.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no presidential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b) Mo.R.Civ.P.(2012).
. All rule references are to the Mo.R.Crim.P. (2012) unless otherwise indicated.