Case Name: JAMES C. SAPIENZA, INCORPORATED, A CORPORATION, APPELLANT (RESPONDENT BELOW), v. ALEXANDER J. MILMOE, Sr., RESPONDENT (APPELLANT BELOW)
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1933-01-05
Citations: 110 N.J.L. 12
Docket Number: 
Parties: JAMES C. SAPIENZA, INCORPORATED, A CORPORATION, APPELLANT (RESPONDENT BELOW), v. ALEXANDER J. MILMOE, Sr., RESPONDENT (APPELLANT BELOW).
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 110
Pages: 12–12

Head Matter:
JAMES C. SAPIENZA, INCORPORATED, A CORPORATION, APPELLANT (RESPONDENT BELOW), v. ALEXANDER J. MILMOE, Sr., RESPONDENT (APPELLANT BELOW).
Submitted October 28, 1932
Decided January 5, 1933.
Ror the appellant (respondent below), Milton M. Unger.
Ror the respondent (appellant below), Koehler & Augenbliclc.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court, and printed in 10 N. J. Mis. R. 135.
For affirmance — -The Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Donges, Brogan, Heher, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.