Case Name: Dajuan DRAKE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2014-09-30
Citations: 443 S.W.3d 728
Docket Number: No. ED 100376
Parties: Dajuan DRAKE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 443
Pages: 728–729

Head Matter:
Dajuan DRAKE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 100376.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Sept. 30, 2014.
Andrew E. Zleit, Asst. Public Defender, MO Public Defender Office, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Adam S. Rowley, Asst. Atty Gen., Office of the Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Dajuan Drake appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).