Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Svetlana Angel YIM, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-04-21
Citations: 570 F. App'x 693
Docket Number: No. 12-30387
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Svetlana Angel YIM, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, and RAWLINSON and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 570
Pages: 693–693

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Svetlana Angel YIM, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-30387.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted April 8, 2014.
Filed April 21, 2014.
Jeffrey Backhus, Assistant U.S., Helen J. Brunner, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Richard Edward Cohen, Assistant U.S., Jerrod C. Patterson, Roger Scott Rogoff, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Suzanne Lee Elliott, Esquire, Law Offices of Suzanne Lee Elliott, Seattle, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, and RAWLINSON and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, a reasonable trier of fact could have found the essential elements of conspiracy to distribute controlled substances, conspiracy to engage in money laundering, and wire fraud beyond a reasonable doubt. See United States v. Nevils, 598 F.3d 1158, 1163-64 (9th Cir. 2010) (en banc) (citing Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)). Therefore, Svetlana Angel Yim's challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting her convictions fails. See id. at 1170.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.