Case Name: Tacoma Land Company, Appellant, v. City of Tacoma et al., Respondents
Court: Washington Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Washington
Decision Date: 1896-02-18
Citations: 14 Wash. 700
Docket Number: No. 2035
Parties: Tacoma Land Company, Appellant, v. City of Tacoma et al., Respondents.
Judges: Hoyt, O. J., and Anders and Gordon, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Washington Reports
Volume: 14
Pages: 700–700

Head Matter:
[No. 2035.
Decided February 18, 1896.]
Tacoma Land Company, Appellant, v. City of Tacoma et al., Respondents.
Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County.— Hon. John C. Stallcup, Judge. Affirmed.
Tillotson & Milligan (Charles 0. Bates, of counsel),for appellant.
James Wickersham, and Stacy W. Gibbs, for respondents.

Opinion:
Dunbar, J.
This case involves the validity of ch. 95, Laws 1893, and is governed by the case of Frederick v. Seattle, 13 Wash. 428.
The last contention of the appellant that, in any event, no assessment can he made against certain lots included in the case is not well taken, for, whatever the law maybe in that respect, the parties who bought this land are not before the court asking for any redress, consequently this question is not raised in this case. In accordance with the rule announced in Frederick v. Seattle, supra, the judgment will be affirmed.
Hoyt, O. J., and Anders and Gordon, JJ., concur.