Case Name: HARMEYER et v. REID, MURDOCH & CO
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1932-04-04
Citations: 13 Ohio Law Abs. 146
Docket Number: 
Parties: HARMEYER et v REID, MURDOCH & CO
Judges: HAMILTON and CUSHING, JJ, concur.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 13
Pages: 146–147

Head Matter:
HARMEYER et v REID, MURDOCH & CO
Ohio Appeals, 1st Dist, Hamilton Co
Decided April 4, 1932
Maurice A. Thon, Cincinnati, for plaintiff in error Stern.
Gutting & Kearns, Cincinnati, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
ROSS, PJ.
The proceeding under the Bulk Sales Law (811103-1, GC), to have the purchaser declared a trustee has been held to be a case in chancery. 2 Ohio Jurisprudence 116, §83; Romeo & Co., Inc. v Nassif, 7 Oh Ap, 382.
This case therefore not being one of those of which the Municipal Court has been given jurisdiction in chancery is outside of the jurisdiction of the Municipal Court, and the demurrer was properly sustained.
The judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton County, reversing the judgment of the Municipal Court, will be reversed, and the judgment of the Municipal Court will be affirmed.
Judgment reversed.
HAMILTON and CUSHING, JJ, concur.