Case Name: Torrington Co., plaintiff and defendant-intervenor v. United States, defendant, and Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd., Koyo Corp. of U.S.A., NTN Corp., NTN Bearing Corp. of America, American NTN Bearing Manufacturing Corp., NTN Driveshaft, Inc., NTN-Bower Corp., and NTN-BCA Corp., defendant-intervenors and plaintiffs
Court: United States Court of International Trade
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-05-20
Citations: 26 Ct. Int'l Trade 523
Docket Number: Consolidated Court No. 99-08-00462
Parties: Torrington Co., plaintiff and defendant-intervenor v. United States, defendant, and Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd., Koyo Corp. of U.S.A., NTN Corp., NTN Bearing Corp. of America, American NTN Bearing Manufacturing Corp., NTN Driveshaft, Inc., NTN-Bower Corp., and NTN-BCA Corp., defendant-intervenors and plaintiffs
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Court of International Trade Reports
Volume: 26
Pages: 523–523

Head Matter:
206 F. Supp. 2d 1296
Torrington Co., plaintiff and defendant-intervenor v. United States, defendant, and Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd., Koyo Corp. of U.S.A., NTN Corp., NTN Bearing Corp. of America, American NTN Bearing Manufacturing Corp., NTN Driveshaft, Inc., NTN-Bower Corp., and NTN-BCA Corp., defendant-intervenors and plaintiffs
Consolidated Court No. 99-08-00462
(Dated May 20, 2002)

Opinion:
JUDGMENT
Tsoucalas, Senior Judge:
This Court, having received and reviewed the United States Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration's ("Commerce") Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, Torrington Co. v. United States, 2001 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 142, Slip Op. 01-135 (Nov. 26, 2001) ("Remand Results"), responses and rebuttal comments by NTN Corporation, NTN Bearing Corporation of America, American NTN Bearing Manufacturing Corporation, NTN Driveshaft, Inc., NTN-Bower Corporation and NTN-BCA Corporation and The Torrington Company's comments, holds that Commerce duly complied with the Court's remand order, and it is hereby
Ordered that the Remand Results filed by Commerce on February 25, 2002, are affirmed in their entirety; and it is further
Ordered that since all other issues have been decided, this case is dismissed.