Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William A. STOTLAR, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-11-10
Citations: 446 F. App'x 247
Docket Number: No. 11-11716
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William A. STOTLAR, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before BARKETT, HULL and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 446
Pages: 247–248

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William A. STOTLAR, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-11716
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Nov. 10, 2011.
Peggy Morris Ronca, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Karen L. Gable, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Orlando, FL, Robert E. O’Neill, David Paul Rhodes, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Peter Warren Kenny, Rosemary T. Cak-mis, Donna Lee Elm, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Orlando, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
William A. Stotlar, Lisbon, OH, pro se.
Before BARKETT, HULL and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Craig Crawford, appointed counsel for William Stotlar in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Stotlar's conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.