Case Name: Anthony Yemoh SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TREASURY INSPECTION GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION (TIGTA), Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-08-14
Citations: 474 F. App'x 929
Docket Number: No. 12-1298
Parties: Anthony Yemoh SMITH, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. TREASURY INSPECTION GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION (TIGTA), Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 474
Pages: 929–929

Head Matter:
Anthony Yemoh SMITH, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. TREASURY INSPECTION GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION (TIGTA), Defendant—Appellee.
No. 12-1298.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 26, 2012.
Decided: Aug. 14, 2012.
Anthony Yemoh Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan S. Cohen, Kenneth W. Rosenberg, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Yemoh Smith appeals the district court's orders dismissing his Privacy Act complaint and his motion to amend his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Smith's motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Treasury Inspection Gen. for Tax Admin., No. 1:11-cv-02033-JKB, 2011 WL 6026040 (D. Md. filed Dec. 1, 2011 & entered Dec. 2, 2011); 2012 WL 11110 (Jan. 4, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.