Case Name: Mary Woolford GIBBS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DORCHESTER COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-10-02
Citations: 698 F. App'x 75
Docket Number: No. 17-1045
Parties: Mary Woolford GIBBS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DORCHESTER COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 698
Pages: 75–75

Head Matter:
Mary Woolford GIBBS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DORCHESTER COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 17-1045
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: September 28, 2017
Decided: October 2, 2017
Robin R. Cockey, Ashley A. Bosché, COCKEY, BRENNAN & MALONEY, PC, Salisbury, Maryland, for Appellant. Lisa Y. Settles, Adam E. Konstas, PES-SIN KATZ LAW, P.A., Towson, Maryland, for Appellee.'
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Mary Woolford Gibbs appeals the magistrate judge's order granting summary judgment on her claim alleging that the Dorchester County Board of Education un-dercompensated her because of her race, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. See Gibbs v. Dorchester Cty. Bd. of Educ., No. 1:16-cv-00395-JMC, 2017 WL 68637 (D. Md. Jan. 6, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the . magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (2012).