Case Name: Minnie RIVERS and Frederick Nathaniel Rivers, her husband, v. Louis C. BAUER and William Wilson, individually and Trading as Universal Laundry Company, and United States of America (two cases)
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1949-07-29
Citations: 175 F.2d 774
Docket Number: Nos. 9884, 9920
Parties: Minnie RIVERS and Frederick Nathaniel Rivers, her husband, v. Louis C. BAUER and William Wilson, individually and Trading as Universal Laundry Company, and United States of America (two cases).
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 175
Pages: 774–774

Head Matter:
Minnie RIVERS and Frederick Nathaniel Rivers, her husband, v. Louis C. BAUER and William Wilson, individually and Trading as Universal Laundry Company, and United States of America (two cases).
Nos. 9884, 9920.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued June 16, 1949.
Decided July 29, 1949.
Raymond Pace Alexander, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiffs.
Leon Fox, Asst. U. S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa. (Gerald A. Gleeson, U. S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for the United States.
Harry R. Axelroth, Philadelphia, Pa. (Axelroth & Porteous, on the brief), for defendants.
Before BIGGS, Ohief Judge, and Mc-LAUGHLIN and O’CONNELL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Careful consideration of the record, the briefs and the arguments of the parties in the instant appeal convinces us that the court below rendered a correct decision. 79 F.Supp. 403. As to damages see our decision in Walshaw, Administratrix, v. Irwin, 3 Cir., 161 F.2d 184. As to damages for loss of consortium alleged by the husband plaintiff the evidence demonstrates this to have been too nebulous to warrant reversal. Accordingly the judgment of the court below will be affirmed.