Case Name: KENILWORTH SUGAR CO. vs. ARTHUR J. NOBLES
Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1914-01-12
Citations: 11 Teiss. 66
Docket Number: No. 5920
Parties: KENILWORTH SUGAR CO. vs. ARTHUR J. NOBLES.
Judges: 
Reporter: Decisions, Court of Appeal, parish of Orleans (Teissier)
Volume: 11
Pages: 66–67

Head Matter:
No. 5920.
KENILWORTH SUGAR CO. vs. ARTHUR J. NOBLES.
Syllabus.
No fraud or eollusiou being charged, an ordinary judgment creditor, claiming no privilege nor other preferential right of payment, and not alleging the insolvency of his debtor, is without right to complain that certain property of his debt- or is being seized and taken in satisfaction of the debt of a third person. Under such circumstances the debtor alone can object.-
Appeal from the Civil District Court, P'arish of Orleans, Division “B,” No. 101,102. Hon. P. D. King, Judge.
Opinion and decree Jan. 12, 1914.
Poster, Milling, Brian & Saal, for plaintiff and appellee.
Zengel, Thomas & Sutton and Loomis, Carroll, Henderson & Carroll and McCall, for defendant and appellant.
S. Wolf and Dupre & Dupre, attorneys.

Opinion:
His Honor EMILE GODCHAUX,
rendered the opinion and decree of the 'Court, as follows:
Plaintiff who sued defendant and seized by garnishment a certain fund declared by the. garnishee to belong to the defendant, seeks to, have it applied to the payment of the judgment it obtained.
Carroll, the ordinary judgment creditor of a third party, the Corbin Motor Oar Company, intervened, claiming that the fund seized belongs to the latter, his debtor, and took a rule upon plaintiff to show cause why the Sheriff should not be ordered to retain the fund until the question of its ownership should be established. The rule was dismissed, and Carroll appeals.
Neither fraud nor collusion on the part of plaintiff, defendant and the Corbin Motor Car Company or any of them is charged; and consequently, Carroll, an ordinary judgment creditor, claiming no privilege nor -other right of preferential payment, -and not alleging the insolvency of his debtor, is without right to complain that the latter's property, if such it be, is being seized and taken to satisfy the debt of defendant or of any other third person. Under such circumstances the debtor, the Cor-bin Motor Car Co., alone can object. .
It is accordingly ordered that the judgment be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.