Case Name: NTN Bearing Corp. of America, NTN Corporation, American NTN Bearing Mfg. Corp., NTN Driveshaft, Inc., and NTN-Bower Corp., plaintiffs and defendant-intervenors v. United States, defendant, and Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd., Koyo Corp. of U.S.A., NSK Ltd., and NSK Corp., defendant-intervenors, and Torrington Co., defendant-intervenor and plaintiff
Court: United States Court of International Trade
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2000-01-18
Citations: 24 Ct. Int'l Trade 33
Docket Number: Consolodated Court No. 97-01-00092
Parties: NTN Bearing Corp. of America, NTN Corporation, American NTN Bearing Mfg. Corp., NTN Driveshaft, Inc., and NTN-Bower Corp., plaintiffs and defendant-intervenors v. United States, defendant, and Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd., Koyo Corp. of U.S.A., NSK Ltd., and NSK Corp., defendant-intervenors, and Torrington Co., defendant-intervenor and plaintiff
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Court of International Trade Reports
Volume: 24
Pages: 33–33

Head Matter:
NTN Bearing Corp. of America, NTN Corporation, American NTN Bearing Mfg. Corp., NTN Driveshaft, Inc., and NTN-Bower Corp., plaintiffs and defendant-intervenors v. United States, defendant, and Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd., Koyo Corp. of U.S.A., NSK Ltd., and NSK Corp., defendant-intervenors, and Torrington Co., defendant-intervenor and plaintiff
Consolodated Court No. 97-01-00092
(Dated January 18, 2000)

Opinion:
JUDGMENT
Tsoucalas, Senior Judge:
This Court having received and reviewed the United States Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration's ("Commerce") Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand ("Remand Results"), NTN Bearing Corp. of America v. United States, 23 CIT 486 Slip Op. 99-71 (July 29, 1999), modified by NTN Bearing Corp. of America v. United States, 23 CIT 800, Slip Op. 99-113 (Oct. 22, 1999), and Commerce having complied with the Court's remand, and no responses to the Remand Results having been submitted by the parties, it is hereby
Ordered that the Remand Results filed by Commerce on November 26, 1999, are affirmed in their entirety; and it is further
Ordered that since all other issues having been previously decided, this case is dismissed.