Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Dajuan BROWN, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2016-03-22
Citations: 484 S.W.3d 876
Docket Number: No. ED 102868
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Dajuan BROWN, Appellant.
Judges: Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J.,- and James M; Dowd, J. •
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 484
Pages: 876–877

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Dajuan BROWN, Appellant.
No. ED 102868
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Filed: March 22, 2016
For Appellant: John K.. Tucci, 720 Olive Street, Suite 1600, St. Louis, Missouri, 63101.
For Respondent: Chris Koster, Christine Lesicko, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102. > ■
Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J.,- and James M; Dowd, J. •

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Dajuan Brown appeals his convictions following a jury trial in thé Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis of one count of first-degree robbery "and one count of armed criminal action. In his two points on appeal, Brown contends that the trial court erred (1) by admitting in- and out-of-court identifications of him the reliability of which was tainted by impermissibly suggestive pretrial identification procedures, and (2) by overruling his challenge under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986), to the State's peremptory strike of a potential juror. We affirm.
We .have concluded that an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth , the reasons for , this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).