Case Name: In the Matter of Gene D. EMMONS, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Indiana
Jurisdiction: Indiana
Decision Date: 2015-09-18
Citations: 42 N.E.3d 518
Docket Number: No. 87S00-1505-DI-262
Parties: In the Matter of Gene D. EMMONS, Respondent.
Judges: All Justices concur.
Reporter: North Eastern Reporter 3d
Volume: 42
Pages: 518–519

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Gene D. EMMONS, Respondent.
No. 87S00-1505-DI-262.
Supreme Court of Indiana.
Sept. 18, 2015.

Opinion:
PUBLISHED ORDER SUSPENDING RESPONDENT FROM THE PRACTICE OF LAW IN INDIANA FOR NONCOOPERATION
On May 13, 2015, this - Court ordered Respondent to show cause why Respondent should not be immediately suspended from the practice of law in this state for failure to cooperate with the Commission's investigation of a grievance, No. 15-1310, filed against Respondent. The order required that Respondent show cause in writing within ten days of service, of the order. On June 10, 2015, the Commission filed a "Request for Ruling and to Tax Costs" asserting that Respondent still has not cooperated. Subsequently, Respondent sought and was granted by this Court extensions of time in which to demonstrate his cooperation with the Commission. Af ter those deadlines passed, the Commission filed a "Renewed Request for Ruling and to Tax Costs" asserting that Respondent still has not cooperated.
Being duly advised, the Court ORDERS that Respondent be suspended from the practice of law for noncooperation with the Commission, effective immediately. Pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 23(10)(f)(3), this suspension shall continue until: (1) the Executive Secretary of the Disciplinary Commission certifies to the Court that Respondent has cooperated fully with the investigation; (2) the investigation or any disciplinary proceedings arising from the investigation are disposed of; or (3) until further order of this Court, provided there are no other suspensions then in effect. Respondent is ordered to fulfill the duties of a suspended attorney under Admission and Discipline Rule 23(26).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 23(10)(f)(5), that Respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Commission $512.96 for the costs of prosecuting this proceeding;
All Justices concur.