Case Name: The State of Washington, Respondent, v. James R. O'Neill, Appellant
Court: Washington Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Washington
Decision Date: 1925-07-31
Citations: 135 Wash. 701
Docket Number: No. 19014
Parties: The State of Washington, Respondent, v. James R. O’Neill, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Washington Reports
Volume: 135
Pages: 701–701

Head Matter:
[No. 19014.
Department Two.
July 31, 1925.]
The State of Washington, Respondent, v. James R. O’Neill, Appellant.
Lucius G. Nash, for appellant.
Chas. H. Leavy and Louis F. Bunge, for respondent.
Reported in 237 Pac. 1119.

Opinion:
Mitchell, J.
— The defendant was found guilty of the crime of unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor and has appealed from a judgment entered on the verdict.
The sole question in the case, as it is presented on the appeal, relates to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction. Upon an examination of the evidence, we find that there was ample evidence that the jury was warranted in believing to sustain the verdict, and therefrom conclude that the judgment must he, and it is, affirmed.
Tolman, C. J., Fullerton, Holcomb, and Mackintosh, JJ., concur.