Case Name: MACKEY v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1911-05-10
Citations: 137 S.W. 669
Docket Number: 
Parties: MACKEY v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 137
Pages: 669–669

Head Matter:
MACKEY v. STATE.
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
May 10, 1911.)
Cbimotai, Law (§ 1094 ) — Appeal — Disposition — Affirmance — Insufficient Presentation.
Where the matters complained of in the motion for a new trial could not be reviewed without the evidence, the conviction will be affirmed; the record not containing a- statement of facts or bill of exceptions and showing no error on its face.
[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Dec. Dig. § 1094. ]
Appeal from Grayson County Court; J. ■Q. Adamson, Judge.
John Mackey was convicted of violating the local option law, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
For other oases see same topic and section NUMBER in Dec. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key No. Series & Rep’r Indexes

Opinion:
DAVIDSON, P. J.
This conviction was for violating the local option law.
The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. The matters complained of in motion for new trial cannot be considered without the evidence.
There being nothing presented in the record that can he reviewed, the judgment is affirmed.