Case Name: Jasmine MCDANIEL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2015-09-15
Citations: 472 S.W.3d 615
Docket Number: No. ED 102101
Parties: Jasmine MCDANIEL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent.
Judges: Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Patricia L. Cohen, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 472
Pages: 615–615

Head Matter:
Jasmine MCDANIEL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent.
No. ED 102101
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
Filed: September 15, 2015
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied October 22, 2015.
Ellen H. Flottman, Woodrail Centre, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203, for Movant/Appel-lant.
Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for Respondent/Respondent,
Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Patricia L. Cohen, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Jasmine McDaniel (Appellant) appeals from the motion court's judgment denying her Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court did not err in denying Appellant's motion. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo.R.Crim.P. 2013, unless otherwise noted.