Case Name: SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY, a Foreign Corporation authorized to do business in the State of Florida, Appellant, v. Florence MOOMEY and H. D. Moomey, Individually and as husband and wife, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1975-04-25
Citations: 312 So. 2d 481
Docket Number: Nos. 74-1172, 74-1659
Parties: SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY, a Foreign Corporation authorized to do business in the State of Florida, Appellant, v. Florence MOOMEY and H. D. Moomey, Individually and as husband and wife, Appellees.
Judges: OWEN, C. J., and WALDEN and MA-GER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 312
Pages: 481–481

Head Matter:
SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY, a Foreign Corporation authorized to do business in the State of Florida, Appellant, v. Florence MOOMEY and H. D. Moomey, Individually and as husband and wife, Appellees.
Nos. 74-1172, 74-1659.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
April 25, 1975.
Rehearing Denied May 30, 1975.
Reed A. Bryan III, McCune, Hiaasen, Crum, Ferris & Gardner, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
Harry G. Carratt, Morgan, Carratt & O’Connor, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Sears, Roebuck & Company, via' these two consolidated interlocutory appeals, seeks to set aside a default judgment entered against it. Being unsuccessful in the trial court, it appeals and presents seven points. We have considered each in the light of argument and all appellate advices. As much as we are dedicated to the proposition that where possible issues should be adjudicated upon the merits, we are unable to find legal error or any basis for reversal. Service of process was, in fact, made and it had actual notice of the proceedings. The complaints of Sears are either lacking in merit or else of some small moment as to constitute harmless error.
Affirmed.
OWEN, C. J., and WALDEN and MA-GER, JJ., concur.