Case Name: C. BLAKE McDOWELL, INC., Petitioner-Appellee, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1978-06-06
Citations: 576 F.2d 718
Docket Number: No. 77-1493
Parties: C. BLAKE McDOWELL, INC., Petitioner-Appellee, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 576
Pages: 718–719

Head Matter:
C. BLAKE McDOWELL, INC., Petitioner-Appellee, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellant.
No. 77-1493.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
June 6, 1978.
As Amended July 11, 1978.
M. Carr Ferguson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Gilbert E. Andrews, Tax Div., U. S. Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., Stuart E. Seigel, Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service, Washington, D. C., for respondent-appellant.
C. Blake McDowell, Jr., Gilbert V. Killing, Jr., Brouse & McDowell Co., Richard J. Kovach, Akron, Ohio, for petitioner-appellee.
Before WEICK, KEITH and MERRITT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
The Commissioner appeals from a decision of the Tax Court finding no deficiencies in the appellee taxpayer's taxes for the taxable years 1972 and 1973. C. Blake McDowell, Inc. v. Commissioner, 67 T.C. 1043 (1977). The issue presented to the Tax Court was the validity of Treas.Reg. § 1.562-l(a) which provides, inter alia, that when a personal holding company distributes appreciated property to its shareholders as deficiency dividends, the amount of a claimed deficiency dividend deduction for the property is limited to the adjusted basis of the property at the time of distribution. The Tax Court found the regulation valid, but yielded to the decision in H. Wetter Manufacturing Co. v. United States, 458 F.2d 1033 (6th Cir. 1972) in which this Court held § 1.562-l(a) invalid and stated the amount of a claimed deduction should be based on the fair market value of the property at the time of distribution. Since this appeal was docketed herein, the Supreme Court in Fulman v. United States, 434 U.S. 528, 98 S.Ct. 841, 55 L.Ed.2d 1 (1978), has upheld the validity of Treas.Reg. § 1.562-1(a), thereby rejecting the Wetter decision. The Commissioner now moves the Court, pursuant to Rule 9(b), Rules of the Sixth Circuit, to summarily reverse the judgment of the Tax Court on the basis of Fulman, supra. The taxpayer moves for dismissal of this appeal and for summary affirmance on the grounds that the Fulman decision should not be given retroactive effect and the Wetter decision still controls the immediate case.
Upon consideration of the parties' motions and the memoranda filed in support thereof,
IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Tax Court be and it hereby is vacated, and the action is remanded to the Tax Court for further proceedings in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Fulman v. United States, supra.