Case Name: Beeding v. Pic
Court: United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1818-06
Citations: 2 Cranch 152
Docket Number: 
Parties: Beeding v. Pic.
Judges: 
Reporter: Reports of cases argued and determined in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia (District of Columbia - reported by Mackey)
Volume: 2
Pages: 152–152

Head Matter:
Beeding v. Pic.
Demand of payment of a promissory note on the clay after the last day of grace, is too late.
Assumpsit against an indorser of Robert Bayley’s note.
H. 'Whetcroft, the notary-public, demanded payment of Bayley on the day after the third day of grace.

Opinion:
The CouRT
(nem. con.) said the payment should have been demanded of Bayley on the third day of grace, and the protest and notice to the indorsers should be on the day after, and referred to the case of Lindenberger v. Beale, at December term, 1813, of this Court. S. C. 6 Wheat. 104.
A juror was withdrawn by consent, and the cause continued. See Renner v. Bank of Columbia, 9 Wheat. 582, and Mills v. Bank of United States, 11 Wheat, 431, 436, as to the usage of banks in making demand of payment on the 4th day.