Case Name: Daniel RIVERS and Sandra Rivers, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. TOPOS SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CORP., Investors Title Company, Inc., and Chicago Title Company, Inc., Defendants/Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-03-31
Citations: 964 S.W.2d 250
Docket Number: No. 72540
Parties: Daniel RIVERS and Sandra Rivers, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. TOPOS SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CORP., Investors Title Company, Inc., and Chicago Title Company, Inc., Defendants/Respondents.
Judges: Before AHRENS, P.J., and CRANDALL and KAROHL, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 964
Pages: 250–250

Head Matter:
Daniel RIVERS and Sandra Rivers, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. TOPOS SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CORP., Investors Title Company, Inc., and Chicago Title Company, Inc., Defendants/Respondents.
No. 72540.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
March 31, 1998.
Edward K. Fehlig, Ziereher & Hocker, St. Louis, for plaintiffs/appellants.
Suzanne M. Besnia, Matthew D. O’Leary, St. Louis, for defendants/respondents.
Before AHRENS, P.J., and CRANDALL and KAROHL, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiffs, Daniel and Sandra Rivers, appeal from the dismissal with prejudice of their petition against two title insurance companies and a surveying company relating to an allegedly defective survey of property Daniel Rivers purchased. We affirm.
We have read the briefs and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).