Case Name: Carlotta Heath, appellant, v. Frederick R. Maddock, respondent
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1913-11-17
Citations: 82 N.J. Eq. 366
Docket Number: 
Parties: Carlotta Heath, appellant, v. Frederick R. Maddock, respondent.
Judges: For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kaliscit, Vreden-BUHGI-I, CONGDON, WHITE, TERI-IUNE, ITePPBNHÉIMER-13.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 82
Pages: 366–366

Head Matter:
Carlotta Heath, appellant, v. Frederick R. Maddock, respondent.
[Argued June 30th, 1913.
Decided November 17th, 1913.]
On appeal from a decree made by the ordinary of the prerogative court, whose opinion is reported in 81. N-. J. Eq. (11 Buck.) iw.
Messrs. Edward A. & William T. Day,-for the appellant.
Messrs. Lum, Tamblyn & Colyer, for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons 'stated in-the opinion filed in the court below by the ordinary.
For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kaliscit, Vreden-BUHGI-I, CONGDON, WHITE, TERI-IUNE, ITePPBNHÉIMER-13.
• For reversal—-None.