Case Name: William J. REEDER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2003-03-21
Citations: 840 So. 2d 437
Docket Number: No. 1D02-2445
Parties: William J. REEDER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: VAN NORTWICK AND POLSTON, JJ„ and SMITH, LARRY G., Senior Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 840
Pages: 437–438

Head Matter:
William J. REEDER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D02-2445.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
March 21, 2003.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; Glenna Joyce Reeves, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Charlie Crist, Attorney General; Sherri T. Rollison, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant appeals a sentence of seventy-five months in the Department of Corrections imposed after he was re-sentenced pursuant to Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000). Appellant claims the trial judge erred in re-sentencing him without the assistance of appointed counsel. We agree. When a defendant is re-sentenced pursuant to Heggs v. State, a de novo hearing is required. The defendant is entitled to be present at the hearing and to receive the assistance of counsel. Jenkins v. State, 816 So.2d 780 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (ruling that in re-sentencing proceedings, such as the one here, the defendant is entitled to a de novo hearing and the assistance of counsel).
Accordingly, we vacate Appellant's sentence and remand for re-sentencing.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
VAN NORTWICK AND POLSTON, JJ" and SMITH, LARRY G., Senior Judge, concur.