Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Wayne Falciglia, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1990-04-03
Citations: 75 N.Y.2d 935
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Wayne Falciglia, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 75
Pages: 935–937

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Wayne Falciglia, Appellant.
Decided April 3, 1990
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Barbara F. Branch and Alvin L. Spitzer for appellant.
Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney (Terence J. Sweeney of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
As the Appellate Division properly concluded, defendant was not entitled to a missing witness charge (see, People v Gonzalez, 68 NY2d 424). The issue of reasonable suspicion is a mixed question of law and fact and, inasmuch as there is evidence in the record to support the lower courts' determina tion, this court's review is at an end (see, People v Castro, 70 NY2d 943, 945). Defendant's remaining arguments are unpreserved.
Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed in a memorandum.