Case Name: FAIRFIELD FOODS, INC. and Mrs. Fields, Inc., Appellants, v. PROVEN CONCEPTS, INC., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1999-11-17
Citations: 748 So. 2d 1048
Docket Number: Nos. 98-3686, 98-3793
Parties: FAIRFIELD FOODS, INC. and Mrs. Fields, Inc., Appellants, v. PROVEN CONCEPTS, INC., Appellee.
Judges: GUNTHER, KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 748
Pages: 1048–1048

Head Matter:
FAIRFIELD FOODS, INC. and Mrs. Fields, Inc., Appellants, v. PROVEN CONCEPTS, INC., Appellee.
Nos. 98-3686, 98-3793.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Nov. 17, 1999.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 12, 2000.
David S. Wood of Baker & Hostetler LLP, Orlando, for appellants.
Howard Pomerantz of Abramowitz & Pomerantz, P.A., Sunrise, and Bruce Bots-ford and Edward R. Curtis of Curtis & Curtis, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appel-lee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm all issues raised by appellants, finding ample evidence to support appellee's claim for breach of contract and the piercing of the corporate veil so as to make Mrs. Fields, Inc. liable for the breach of contract by Fairfield Foods. We agree with appellee, on the cross-appeal, that the trial court erred in denying prejudgment interest in this breach of contract case. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co. v. Percefull, 653 So.2d 389 (Fla.1995). The jury verdict awarding damages had the effect of liquidating the damages as of September 13, 1989, which was the end of the two year period in which the contract was in effect. We therefore reverse for an award of prejudgment interest from that date.
GUNTHER, KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.