Case Name: Michael AKINS; Betty Akins, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Ronald J. RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellee, American Nuclear Insurers, Inc., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1994-06-07
Citations: 26 F.3d 105
Docket Number: No. 90-16163
Parties: Michael AKINS; Betty Akins, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Ronald J. RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellee, American Nuclear Insurers, Inc., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: GOODWIN, O’SCANNLAIN, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 26
Pages: 105–105

Head Matter:
Michael AKINS; Betty Akins, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Ronald J. RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellee, American Nuclear Insurers, Inc., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 90-16163.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
June 7, 1994.
Before: GOODWIN, O’SCANNLAIN, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
On February 3, 1994, this court issued an opinion that affirmed the district court's decision to abstain from hearing this case because of a pending state case. Akins v. Rodriguez, 15 F.3d 883 (9th Cir.1994). On February 25, 1994, we stayed the mandate pending a sua sponte call for en banc reconsideration to determine whether our opinion conflicts with Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., 12 F.3d 908 (9th Cir.1993).
On May 12, 1994, the parties filed a stipulation for dismissal of the entire action with prejudice. Accordingly, this ease is DISMISSED pursuant to the stipulation of the parties.
This court's opinion filed on February 3, 1994, is VACATED and the case is REMANDED with instructions to the district court to VACATE its judgment. See United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).