Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Timothy W. OMER, Defendant-Appellant; United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Timothy W. OMER, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-10-31
Citations: 429 F.3d 835
Docket Number: Nos. 03-30513, 03-30544
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Timothy W. OMER, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Timothy W. OMER, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before HAWKINS, THOMAS, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 429
Pages: 835–843

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Timothy W. OMER, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Timothy W. OMER, Defendant-Appellee.
Nos. 03-30513, 03-30544.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Oct. 31, 2005.
Kris A. McLean, Esq., USMI-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Missoula, MT, Michael A. Rotker, U.S. Dept, of Justice, Criminal Div., Appellate Section, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Michael J. Sherwood, Esq., Missoula, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before HAWKINS, THOMAS, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
The panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge of the court requested a vote on whether to rehear the case en banc, but the request failed to receive a majority of votes of the nonre-cused active judges in favor of en banc rehearing.
The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED.