Case Name: Gilbert L. SPURLOCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-05-19
Citations: 96 F. App'x 916
Docket Number: No. 04-1279
Parties: Gilbert L. SPURLOCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 96
Pages: 916–917

Head Matter:
Gilbert L. SPURLOCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 04-1279.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 13, 2004.
Decided: May 19, 2004.
Gilbert L. Spurlock, Appellant, pro se.
Sandra Henson Kinney, Office of the United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Gilbert L. Spurlock appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil action against the United States Army Corps of Engineers. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Spurlock v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng'rs, No. CA-02-404-3 (S.D.W.Va. Feb. 3, 2004). Spurlock's motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED