Case Name: FAJARDO SUGAR GROWERS ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1959-04-02
Citations: 264 F.2d 671
Docket Number: No. 177, Docket 25221
Parties: FAJARDO SUGAR GROWERS ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before MEDINA and HINCKS, Circuit Judges, and MATHES, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 264
Pages: 671–671

Head Matter:
FAJARDO SUGAR GROWERS ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 177, Docket 25221.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued March 4, 1959.
Decided April 2, 1959.
Irving Jay Greenspan, New York, N. Y. (Simone N. Gazan and Isidor Enselman, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellant.
Renee J. Ginsberg, Asst. U. S. Atty. for Southern District of New York, New York City (Arthur H. Christy, U. S. Atty., S. D. N. Y., New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellee.
Before MEDINA and HINCKS, Circuit Judges, and MATHES, District Judge.
United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Construing the order below as one directing a dismissal for lack of jurisdiction, we affirm. 161 F.Supp. 912. United States v. Chicago Golf Club, 7 Cir., 84 F.2d 914, 106 A.L.R. 209. See Pacific Mills v. Nichols, 1 Cir., 72 F.2d 103.
Affirmed.