Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Miguel Rojas, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2014-10-22
Citations: 121 A.D.3d 1023
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Miguel Rojas, Appellant.
Judges: Skelos, J.P, Dickerson, Maltese and LaSalle, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 121
Pages: 1023–1024

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Miguel Rojas, Appellant.
[993 NYS2d 783]

Opinion:
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Aloise, J.), rendered January 4, 2012, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered.
The defendant and his codefendant, Sebastian Giraldo, were tried together and were each convicted of two counts of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree. For the reasons set forth in this Court's decision and order entitled People v Giraldo (116 AD3d 711, 712 [2014]), the Supreme Court's mischaracterization of the contents of a particular jury note deprived defense counsel of prior meaningful notice of the contents of the note and an opportunity to suggest appropriate responses in accordance with CPL 310.30 and People v O'Rama (78 NY2d 270 [1991]). Accordingly, a new trial is required based on the Supreme Court's failure to comply with CPL 310.30 in accordance with the procedure set forth in People v O'Rama (see People v Giraldo, 116 AD3d at 711-712).
The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.
Skelos, J.P, Dickerson, Maltese and LaSalle, JJ., concur.