Case Name: Oscar J. RODRIGUES, Appellant, v. Celso CASSIANO, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2003-05-14
Citations: 844 So. 2d 778
Docket Number: No. 3D02-2383
Parties: Oscar J. RODRIGUES, Appellant, v. Celso CASSIANO, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and FLETCHER, J., and NESBITT, Senior Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 844
Pages: 778–778

Head Matter:
Oscar J. RODRIGUES, Appellant, v. Celso CASSIANO, Appellee.
No. 3D02-2383.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 14, 2003.
A. Margaret Hesford, Margate, for appellant.
Arthur J. Morburger, Miami, for appel-lee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and FLETCHER, J., and NESBITT, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Mangus v. Present, 135 So.2d 417, 419 (Fla.1961)(either a benefit or advantage to the promisor, or detriment or inconvenience to the promisee, is legal consideration for a contract); 11 Fla. Jur 2d Contracts § 88, Benefit or Detriment (2003).