Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Ryan T. PATTERSON, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-10-30
Citations: 382 S.W.3d 262
Docket Number: No. ED 97440
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Ryan T. PATTERSON, Appellant.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR. P.J. and ROY L. RICHTER and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 382
Pages: 262–262

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Ryan T. PATTERSON, Appellant.
No. ED 97440.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Oct. 30, 2012.
Ellen H. Flottman, Woodrail Centre, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.
Chris A. Koster, Attorney General, Jennifer Ann Wideman, Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR. P.J. and ROY L. RICHTER and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Ryan Patterson ("Defendant") appeals from the judgment following his conviction for three counts of murder in the first degree, Section 565.020, RSMo 2000. Defendant argues the trial court erred in admitting Defendant's audiotaped statement and the transcript of that statement in that he requested counsel and that request was ignored.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).