Case Name: Jose J. OLAGUES, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Joseph P. RUSSONIELLO, individually and in his capacity as United States Attorney for the Northern District of California, et al., Defendants-Appellees; Jose J. OLAGUES, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated; Hispanic Coalition for Human Rights, Chinese for Affirmative Action, and San Francisco Latino Voter Registration Education Project, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Joseph P. RUSSONIELLO, individually and in his capacity as United States Attorney for the Northern District of California; O'Malley, William A., individually and in his capacity as District Attorney for Santa Clara County; Underwood, Lon, Individually and in his capacity as registrar of voters for Contra Costa County; Smith, Arlo, individually and in his capacity as District Attorney for San Francisco County, et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1987-11-12
Citations: 832 F.2d 131
Docket Number: Nos. 82-4427, 83-2581
Parties: Jose J. OLAGUES, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Joseph P. RUSSONIELLO, individually and in his capacity as United States Attorney for the Northern District of California, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Jose J. OLAGUES, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated; Hispanic Coalition for Human Rights, Chinese for Affirmative Action, and San Francisco Latino Voter Registration Education Project, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Joseph P. RUSSONIELLO, individually and in his capacity as United States Attorney for the Northern District of California; O’Malley, William A., individually and in his capacity as District Attorney for Santa Clara County; Underwood, Lon, Individually and in his capacity as registrar of voters for Contra Costa County; Smith, Arlo, individually and in his capacity as District Attorney for San Francisco County, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, WALLACE, SNEED, HUG, TANG, SKOPIL, SCHROEDER, PREGERSON, ALARCON, FERGUSON and BEEZER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 832
Pages: 131–132

Head Matter:
Jose J. OLAGUES, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Joseph P. RUSSONIELLO, individually and in his capacity as United States Attorney for the Northern District of California, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Jose J. OLAGUES, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated; Hispanic Coalition for Human Rights, Chinese for Affirmative Action, and San Francisco Latino Voter Registration Education Project, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Joseph P. RUSSONIELLO, individually and in his capacity as United States Attorney for the Northern District of California; O’Malley, William A., individually and in his capacity as District Attorney for Santa Clara County; Underwood, Lon, Individually and in his capacity as registrar of voters for Contra Costa County; Smith, Arlo, individually and in his capacity as District Attorney for San Francisco County, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Nos. 82-4427, 83-2581.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Nov. 12, 1987.
Joaquin G. Avila and Ronald T. Vera, American Civil Liberties Union, Alan L. Schlosser, San Francisco, Cal., and California Rural Legal Assistance, Kathleen A. Pool, Marysville, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants.
William T. McGivern, Tarkington, Carey, O’Conner & O’Neill, John D. O’Connor, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellees.
Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, WALLACE, SNEED, HUG, TANG, SKOPIL, SCHROEDER, PREGERSON, ALARCON, FERGUSON and BEEZER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
Pursuant to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Russoniello v. Olagues, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 52, 98 L.Ed.2d 17 (1987), the judgment of this, court filed August 26, 1986, 797 F.2d 1511 (9th Cir.1986) (en banc), is vacated. The case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California for dismissal as moot. United States v. Munsingwear, 340 U.S. 36, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).