Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Daniel D. DAVID, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1996-03-26
Citations: 918 S.W.2d 331
Docket Number: Nos. WD 49213, WD 51259
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Daniel D. DAVID, Appellant.
Judges: Before SPINDEN, P.J., and BERREY and LAURA DENVIR STITH, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 918
Pages: 331–332

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Daniel D. DAVID, Appellant.
Nos. WD 49213, WD 51259.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
March 26, 1996.
Rose M. Wibbenmeyer, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Cheryl A. Caponegro, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before SPINDEN, P.J., and BERREY and LAURA DENVIR STITH, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Defendant Daniel D. David appeals his conviction of tampering with a witness in violation of Section 575.270, RSMo 1986. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error. Because a published opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential value, we affirm by this summary order under Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b). In addition, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth our reasoning.
Judgment affirmed. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).