Case Name: Jack L. THULEN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marvin BAUSMAN, individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Carroll County, Illinois, Defendant-Appellant; Derrell E. UPTON, Plainitff-Appellee, v. Bernie C. THOMPSON, individually and in his capacity as Sheriff of Kankakee County, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1991-07-26
Citations: 938 F.2d 84
Docket Number: Nos. 89-3627, 90-1559
Parties: Jack L. THULEN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marvin BAUSMAN, individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Carroll County, Illinois, Defendant-Appellant. Derrell E. UPTON, Plainitff-Appellee, v. Bernie C. THOMPSON, individually and in his capacity as Sheriff of Kankakee County, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: with whom WOOD, Jr., CUDAHY, and POSNER, Circuit Judges, join,
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 938
Pages: 84–86

Head Matter:
Jack L. THULEN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marvin BAUSMAN, individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Carroll County, Illinois, Defendant-Appellant. Derrell E. UPTON, Plainitff-Appellee, v. Bernie C. THOMPSON, individually and in his capacity as Sheriff of Kankakee County, Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 89-3627, 90-1559.
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
July 26, 1991.
Timothy T. McLaughlin, Oak Lawn, Ill., for Jack L. Thulen.
Marilyn Longwell, Charmaine E. Dwyer, Kerr & Longwell, Chicago, Ill., for Derrell E. Upton.
Charles E. Hervas, James G. Sotos, James R. Schirott, Michael W. Condon, Schirott & Associates, Itasca, III, Richard R. Haldeman, Williams & McCarthy, Rockford, Ill., for Marvin Bausman.
Charles E. Hervas, James G. Sotos, Michael W. Condon, Phillip A. Luetkehans, Schirott & Associates, Itasca, III, for Bernie C. Thompson.

Opinion:
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC
Plaintiffs-Appellees Jack L. Thulen and Derrell E. Upton filed petitions for rehearing and suggestions for rehearing en banc on May 6, 1991 and May 21, 1991 respectively. All members of the panel voted to deny the petitions for rehearing. A vote of the active members of the court was requested, and a majority of the active judges have voted to deny a rehearing en banc. Circuit Judges Wood, Jr., Cudahy, Posner, and Ripple voted to grant rehearing en banc. The petition for rehearing is therefore Denied.
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge,
with whom WOOD, Jr., CUDAHY, and POSNER, Circuit Judges, join,