Case Name: Marco Bulat et al., respondents, v. Eliza Londrigan et al., appellants
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1903-06-19
Citations: 65 N.J. Eq. 718
Docket Number: 
Parties: Marco Bulat et al., respondents, v. Eliza Londrigan et al., appellants.
Judges: For affirmance — The Ciiiee-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Voori-iees, Vroom — 11.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 65
Pages: 718–719

Head Matter:
Marco Bulat et al., respondents, v. Eliza Londrigan et al., appellants.
[Filed June 19th, 1903.]
Mr. Horace L. Allen, for the appellants.
Mr. James B. Yredenburgh, for the respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Pitney, delivered by him in the court of chancery, and reported in 18 Dick. Ch. Rep. 22.
For affirmance — The Ciiiee-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Voori-iees, Vroom — 11.
For reversal — Hendrickson—1.