Case Name: Morris Oresky, Respondent, v. Manhattan Savings Bank, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1959-06-16
Citations: 8 A.D.2d 788
Docket Number: 
Parties: Morris Oresky, Respondent, v. Manhattan Savings Bank, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 8
Pages: 788–788

Head Matter:
Morris Oresky, Respondent, v. Manhattan Savings Bank, Appellant.

Opinion:
Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. It is not necessary to plead the matter contained in the separate defense and counterclaim in order to ensure- its materiality under the pleadings. If defendant offers evidence relating to the allegations of the aforementioned defense and counterclaim, it will be for the trial court to pass upon its admissibility. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, Stevens and Bastow, JJ.