Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Albert Ermmarino, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2007-06-05
Citations: 41 A.D.3d 497
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Albert Ermmarino, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 41
Pages: 497–497

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Albert Ermmarino, Appellant.
[835 NYS2d 907]

Opinion:
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Farneti, J), rendered October 16, 2003, convicting him of conspiracy in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that he did not receive the effective assistance of trial counsel is based partly on matter dehors the record which cannot be reviewed on direct appeal (see People v Cumba, 32 AD3d 444 [2006]). To the extent that the defendant's claim that defense counsel rendered ineffective assistance of counsel is reviewable on direct appeal, defense counsel provided meaningful representation (see People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 714 [1998]; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Schmidt, J.P., Rivera, Angiolillo and Balkin, JJ., concur.