Case Name: Ricardo PADILLA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2015-04-17
Citations: 162 So. 3d 1101
Docket Number: No. 2D13-4062
Parties: Ricardo PADILLA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: CASANUEVA and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 162
Pages: 1101–1101

Head Matter:
Ricardo PADILLA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D13-4062.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
April 17, 2015.
Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Tim Bower Rodriguez, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jonathan P. Hurley, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appel-lee.

Opinion:
KHOUZAM, Judge.
Ricardo Padilla challenges the order partially denying and partially granting his motion to correct illegal sentence. Padilla's notice of appeal is untimely as to this postconviction order. See Taylor v. State, 140 So.3d 526, 528 (Fla.2014) ("[A]n order disposing of a postconviction motion which partially denies and partially grants relief is a final order for purposes of appeal, even if the relief granted requires subsequent action in the underlying case, such as resentencing."). However, we conclude that Padilla is entitled to a belated appeal because the postconviction court incorrectly advised Padilla to file his notice of appeal within 30 days of resentencing and Padilla apparently relied on the postcon-viction court's instructions, filing his notice of appeal within that time frame. Ultimately, we affirm the denial of Padilla's claim without comment.
Affirmed.
CASANUEVA and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.