Case Name: Midori Shimamoto, as Administratrix of the Estate of Bart Schwartz, Deceased, et al., Respondents, v. S&F Warehouses, Inc., et al., Defendants, and Simon, Meyrowitz, Meyrowitz & Schlussel, Appellant. (And a Third-Party Action.)
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2006-03-28
Citations: 6 N.Y.3d 826
Docket Number: 
Parties: Midori Shimamoto, as Administratrix of the Estate of Bart Schwartz, Deceased, et al., Respondents, v S&F Warehouses, Inc., et al., Defendants, and Simon, Meyrowitz, Meyrowitz & Schlussel, Appellant. (And a Third-Party Action.)
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 6
Pages: 826–827

Head Matter:
Midori Shimamoto, as Administratrix of the Estate of Bart Schwartz, Deceased, et al., Respondents, v S&F Warehouses, Inc., et al., Defendants, and Simon, Meyrowitz, Meyrowitz & Schlussel, Appellant. (And a Third-Party Action.)
Submitted March 6, 2006;
decided March 28, 2006

Opinion:
Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that the State Constitution (NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b] [3], [4]) and the CPLR (CPLR 5601 [c]; 5602 [b] [1]) do not authorize a grant of leave to defendant on a certified question in these circumstances (see Maynard v Greenberg, 82 NY2d 913 [1994]).