Case Name: Moore, administrator, v. Walton et al.
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1923-04-13
Citations: 155 Ga. 481
Docket Number: No. 3507
Parties: Moore, administrator, v. Walton et al.
Judges: All the Justices concur.
Reporter: Georgia Reports
Volume: 155
Pages: 481–481

Head Matter:
Moore, administrator, v. Walton et al.
No. 3507.
April 13, 1923.
Rehearing denied June 7, 1923.
Appeal. Before Judge Ellis. Eulton superior court. October 28, 1922. ■ . -
McDaniel & Neely and J. M. M.oare, for plaintiff in error.
Clement E. Sutton and Anderson, Rountree & Crenshaw, contra.

Opinion:
Gilbert, J.
The exception in this case is to the first grant of a new trial; and therefore, in order to determine whether the verdict rendered by the jury was demanded, a proper brief of the evidence is essential. What purports to be a brief of the evidence consists, in the main, of a full stenographic report of the testimony, containing all of the questions to the witnesses and their answei's. This is not a sufficient compliance with the statute; and therefore the judgment is affirmed. Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.