Case Name: Elizabeth Caccia NELSON, Claimant/Appellant, v. DIERBERGS MARKETS, Employer/Respondent. and Self c/o Corporate Claims Mgt., Insurer
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-12-26
Citations: 209 S.W.3d 528
Docket Number: No. ED 88111
Parties: Elizabeth Caccia NELSON, Claimant/Appellant, v. DIERBERGS MARKETS, Employer/Respondent. and Self c/o Corporate Claims Mgt., Insurer.
Judges: Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 209
Pages: 528–528

Head Matter:
Elizabeth Caccia NELSON, Claimant/Appellant, v. DIERBERGS MARKETS, Employer/Respondent. and Self c/o Corporate Claims Mgt., Insurer.
No. ED 88111.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Dec. 26, 2006.
David G. Plufka, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Loretta A. Simon, Greta E. Cheney, Simon and Early, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Claimant appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, affirming the award of the Administrative Law Judge. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. No error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished, for their information only, with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).