Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Sharod J. JACKSON, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-12-11
Citations: 387 S.W.3d 408
Docket Number: No. ED 98198
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Sharod J. JACKSON, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and LISA S. VAN AMBURG, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 387
Pages: 408–409

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Sharod J. JACKSON, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 98198.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Dec. 11, 2012.
Amanda Page Faerber, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Todd Tyler Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and LISA S. VAN AMBURG, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Sharod J. Jackson appeals from the judgment upon his conviction by a jury for possession of a controlled substance — cocaine base, in violation of Section 195.202, RSMo. Cum.Supp.2010, for which he was sentenced to two-years' imprisonment. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).