Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lee Mark HUGGINS, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-05-31
Citations: 473 F. App'x 290
Docket Number: No. 12-6460
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lee Mark HUGGINS, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 473
Pages: 290–291

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lee Mark HUGGINS, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-6460.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 24, 2012.
Decided: May 31, 2012.
Lee Mark Huggins, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. William E. Day, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Lee Mark Huggins, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Huggins, No. 4:00-cr-00503-CWH-17 (D.S.C. Feb. 29, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.