Case Name: JAMES R. NUGENT, APPELLANT, v. STUART LINDSAY ET AL., RESPONDENTS
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1927-01-31
Citations: 103 N.J.L. 500
Docket Number: 
Parties: JAMES R. NUGENT, APPELLANT, v. STUART LINDSAY ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 103
Pages: 500–500

Head Matter:
JAMES R. NUGENT, APPELLANT, v. STUART LINDSAY ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Submitted October 29, 1926
Decided January 31, 1927.
For the appellant, James B. Nugent.
For the respondents, Herbert Boggs and John Francis Cahill.

Opinion:
Pee Cueiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered bj the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.