Case Name: Carol L. PIZZUTO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rebecca RANDOLPH; Richard Lucas; Main Street Financial Services Corporation, (Holding Co. for) Main Street Bank; William Criswell; Kevin Gessler; Shawn R. Turak; The Honorable Scott R. Smith; City of Wheeling; Joe Doe, I, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-10-25
Citations: 399 F. App'x 843
Docket Number: No. 10-1663
Parties: Carol L. PIZZUTO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rebecca RANDOLPH; Richard Lucas; Main Street Financial Services Corporation, (Holding Co. for) Main Street Bank; William Criswell; Kevin Gessler; Shawn R. Turak; The Honorable Scott R. Smith; City of Wheeling; Joe Doe, I, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 399
Pages: 843–843

Head Matter:
Carol L. PIZZUTO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rebecca RANDOLPH; Richard Lucas; Main Street Financial Services Corporation, (Holding Co. for) Main Street Bank; William Criswell; Kevin Gessler; Shawn R. Turak; The Honorable Scott R. Smith; City of Wheeling; Joe Doe, I, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 10-1663.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 19, 2010.
Decided: Oct. 25, 2010.
Carol L. Pizzuto, Appellant Pro Se. Keith C. Gamble, Pullin, Fowler, Flanagan, Brown & Poe, P.L.L.C., Morgantown, West Virginia; Nathanial Adam Kuratomi, Jenkins Fenstermaker, P.L.L.C., Huntington, West Virginia; David Lee Wyant, Bailey & Wyant, P.L.L.C., Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Carol L. Pizzuto appeals the district court's orders staying discovery, denying her motion to remand, and granting Defendants' motions to dismiss. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pizzuto v. Randolph, No. 5:10-cv-00017-FPS, 2010 WL 2402861 (N.D.W. Va. June 3, 2010; June 10, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.