Case Name: Lynn Ellen MENDES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles BROWN; Charlotte Mecklenburg Public Library, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-02-13
Citations: 465 F. App'x 232
Docket Number: No. 11-1710
Parties: Lynn Ellen MENDES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles BROWN; Charlotte Mecklenburg Public Library, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 465
Pages: 232–232

Head Matter:
Lynn Ellen MENDES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles BROWN; Charlotte Mecklenburg Public Library, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 11-1710.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 9, 2012.
Decided: Feb. 13, 2012.
Lynn Ellen Mendes, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Lynn Ellen Mendes appeals the district court's orders dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006), and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mendes v. Brown, No. 3:10-cv-00397-RLV-DCK (W.D.N.C. Nov. 19, 2010; Aug. 29, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.