Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Sean SHARER, also known as Cowboy Sean, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-04-18
Citations: 685 F. App'x 365
Docket Number: No. 16-10788 Conference Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Sean SHARER, also known as Cowboy Sean, Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before KING, HAYNES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 685
Pages: 365–365

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Sean SHARER, also known as Cowboy Sean, Defendant-Appellant
No. 16-10788 Conference Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed April 18, 2017
James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Sean Sharer, Pro Se
Before KING, HAYNES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Sean Sharer has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Sharer has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Sharer's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Sharer's response. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Sharer's request to proceed pro se on appeal is untimely, and, therefore, it is DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998).
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4,