Case Name: Elizabeth NEGRON, Appellant, v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1998-09-04
Citations: 716 So. 2d 858
Docket Number: No. 97-1058
Parties: Elizabeth NEGRON, Appellant, v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, et al., Appellees.
Judges: DAUKSCH, W. SHARP and ANTOON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 716
Pages: 858–858

Head Matter:
Elizabeth NEGRON, Appellant, v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, et al., Appellees.
No. 97-1058.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Sept. 4, 1998.
Elizabeth Negron, Orlando, pro se.
John D. Maher, Tallahassee, for Appellee Unemployment Appeals Commission.
No Appearance for Appellee All Purpose Insurance, Inc.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The issue on appeal is whether there was sufficient evidence presented to support the appeals referee's decision that Negron was properly discharged for misconduct pursuant to section 443.036(26), and the consequent denial of receiving unemployment compensation benefits. However, Negron has provided us with no transcript of the hearing. Therefore we cannot review that issue, and the decision below comes to us with a presumption of correctness. Wolfson v. Unemployment Appeals Commission, 649 So.2d 363 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).
AFFIRMED.
DAUKSCH, W. SHARP and ANTOON, JJ., concur.
. '§ 443.101(l)(a)2, Fla. Stat.
. See Estrada v. Unemployment Appeals Commission, 693 So.2d 1091 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997).