Case Name: Terrence Edmond TATE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Billy MARTIN, Head of Medical; J. Kelly, Tillery Unit Manager; JOHN DOE; Kenneth M. Jones, Inmate Grievance Examiner, Defendants-Appellees, and Mr. Jones, Physician; Mr. Jones; Dr. Sami Hasan; Jennifer Langley; Lewis O. Smith; Burleson; Hudson; Burns; Eudg; John Doe # 1; Walh; Eubert; Almond; Rocky Honeycutt; Kelly Tillery; Kenddal; Ms. Luther; Morrison; Jane Doe # 1; Jane Doe # 2; Hildreth Tillery; Boyd Bennett; Robert C. Lewis, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-09-02
Citations: 583 F. App'x 60
Docket Number: No. 14-6508
Parties: Terrence Edmond TATE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Billy MARTIN, Head of Medical; J. Kelly, Tillery Unit Manager; JOHN DOE; Kenneth M. Jones, Inmate Grievance Examiner, Defendants-Appellees, and Mr. Jones, Physician; Mr. Jones; Dr. Sami Hasan; Jennifer Langley; Lewis O. Smith; Burleson; Hudson; Burns; Eudg; John Doe # 1; Walh; Eubert; Almond; Rocky Honeycutt; Kelly Tillery; Kenddal; Ms. Luther; Morrison; Jane Doe # 1; Jane Doe # 2; Hildreth Tillery; Boyd Bennett; Robert C. Lewis, Defendants.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 583
Pages: 60–61

Head Matter:
Terrence Edmond TATE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Billy MARTIN, Head of Medical; J. Kelly, Tillery Unit Manager; JOHN DOE; Kenneth M. Jones, Inmate Grievance Examiner, Defendants-Appellees, and Mr. Jones, Physician; Mr. Jones; Dr. Sami Hasan; Jennifer Langley; Lewis O. Smith; Burleson; Hudson; Burns; Eudg; John Doe # 1; Walh; Eubert; Almond; Rocky Honeycutt; Kelly Tillery; Kenddal; Ms. Luther; Morrison; Jane Doe # 1; Jane Doe # 2; Hildreth Tillery; Boyd Bennett; Robert C. Lewis, Defendants.
No. 14-6508.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 28, 2014.
Decided: Sept. 2, 2014.
Terrence Edmond Tate, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Yvette Harper, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Terrence Edmond Tate appeals the magistrate judge's order denying his motion for the appointment of counsel, the district court's text order denying Tate's motions to compel, and the district court's final order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tate v. Martin, No. 1:10-cv-00616-TDS-JLW (M.D.N.C. May 10, 2012; Jan. 3, 2014; Mar. 20, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.