Case Name: Anna Dusenberry, appellant, v. Helen Ibach et al., executors, respondents
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1926-10-27
Citations: 100 N.J. Eq. 345
Docket Number: 
Parties: Anna Dusenberry, appellant, v. Helen Ibach et al., executors, respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 100
Pages: 345–346

Head Matter:
Anna Dusenberry, appellant, v. Helen Ibach et al., executors, respondents.
[Decided October 27th, 1926.]
Messrs. Morrison, Lloyd & Morrison, for the appellant.
Messrs. Maclcey & Maclcey, Mr. John M. Dolan, Mr. Frederick V. Watson, Mr. Charles C. Scott, and Messrs. Humphreys & Sumner, for the respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.
For affirmance — Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Trenci-iard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbaoh, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.