Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alcee L. HASTINGS, Defendant, Post-Newsweek Stations, Inc., et al., Intervenors-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1983-05-02
Citations: 704 F.2d 559
Docket Number: No. 82-6137
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alcee L. HASTINGS, Defendant, Post-Newsweek Stations, Inc., et al., Intervenors-Appellants.
Judges: Before RONEY, VANCE and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 704
Pages: 559–562

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alcee L. HASTINGS, Defendant, Post-Newsweek Stations, Inc., et al., Intervenors-Appellants.
No. 82-6137.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
May 2, 1983.
Robert S. Catz, College of Law, Cleveland State Univ., Cleveland, Ohio, Terence J. Anderson, Coral Gables, Fla., for Hastings.
Reid Weingarden, Robert Richter, Jo Ann Farrington, Dept, of Justice, Crim. Div., Washington, D.C., for U.S.
Steel, Hector & Davis, Talbot D’Alemberte, Donald M. Middlebrooks, Thomas R. Julin, Miami, Fla., for Post-Newsweek Stations, Inc., Wometco, Outlet Broadcasting, Miami Herald, Radio-Television News Director Assn., etc.
Erwin G. Krasnow, Senior Vice President and General Counsel, National Association of Broadcasters, Washington, D.C., Sara Rose Mullens, Corporate Counsel, Wometco Enterprises, Inc., Miami, Fla., Stephen E. Nevas, First Amendment Counsel, National Association of Broadcasters, Washington, D.C., for Community Television Foundation of South Florida, Inc.
Stephen T. Maher, Miami, Fla., for American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Fla., Inc.
Walter Terry Maguire, Washington, D.C., for American Newspaper Publishers Assoc.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion January 4, 1983, 11th Cir., 1983, 695 F.2d 1278)
Before RONEY, VANCE and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the reconsideration of this cause en banc, and a majority of the judges in active service not having voted in favor of it, rehearing en banc is DENIED. 695 F.2d 1278.