Case Name: Waldo JEUNE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2015-12-23
Citations: 181 So. 3d 1250
Docket Number: No. 3D15-2594
Parties: Waldo JEUNE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SHEPHERD, LAGOA and EMAS, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 181
Pages: 1250–1250

Head Matter:
Waldo JEUNE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D15-2594.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 23, 2015.
Waldo Jeune, in proper person.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SHEPHERD, LAGOA and EMAS, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed: See Bover v. State, 797 So.2d 1246, 1249 (Fla.2001) (holding that rule 3.800(a) "is not a vehicle designed to reexamine whether the procedure employed to impose the punishment comported with statutory law and due process")(quoting with approval Judge v. State, 596 So.2d 73, 77 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)); Carter v. State, 786 So.2d 1173, 1181 (Fla.2001) (holding "a sentence is 'illegal' if it imposes a kind of punishment that no judge under the entire body of sentencing statutes could possibly inflict under any set of factual circumstances").