Case Name: City of Barron and another, Appellants, vs. Industrial Commission of Wisconsin and others, Respondents
Court: Wisconsin Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Wisconsin
Decision Date: 1926-01-12
Citations: 188 Wis. 653
Docket Number: 
Parties: City of Barron and another, Appellants, vs. Industrial Commission of Wisconsin and others, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Wisconsin Reports
Volume: 188
Pages: 653–654

Head Matter:
City of Barron and another, Appellants, vs. Industrial Commission of Wisconsin and others, Respondents.
December 11, 1925
January 12, 1926.
For the appellants there was a brief by uarles, Spence & Quarles, attorneys, and Arthur B. Doe and Kenneth P. Grubb, of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Doe.
For. the respondent Industrial Commission there was a brief by the Attorney General and Mortimer Levitan and Suel 0. Arnold, assistant attorneys general, and oral'ar- • gument by Mr. Arnold.
For the respondent Barron Woolen Mill. Company there' was a brief by Charles A. Taylor of Barron.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane county confirming the award of the Industrial Commission in favor of the defendant Warren Taft and against the plaintiffs. Upon consideration of the case here, the Chief Justice deeming himself disqualified, the remaining six members are equally divided in opinion as to whether the judgment should be affirmed or reversed. Under the rule, this situation results in an af-firmance of the judgment.
Judgment appealed from is affirmed.