Case Name: Mary A. Wootton et al., respondents, v. Michael Seltzer et al., appellants
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1915-03-01
Citations: 84 N.J. Eq. 207
Docket Number: 
Parties: Mary A. Wootton et al., respondents, v. Michael Seltzer et al., appellants.
Judges: For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Kalisch, Black, Bogert, Vredenburgh, White, Heppenheimer — 12.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 84
Pages: 207–207

Head Matter:
Mary A. Wootton et al., respondents, v. Michael Seltzer et al., appellants.
[Argued November 19th, 1914.
Decided March 1st, 1915.]
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Learning, whose opinion is reported in 83 N. J. Eq. 163.
Messrs. Wilson & Carr, for the respondents.
Messrs. Bourgeois & Coulomb, for the appellants.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Leaming.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Kalisch, Black, Bogert, Vredenburgh, White, Heppenheimer — 12.
For reversal — None.