Case Name: THE MAYOR AND ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF PATERSON, APPELLANT, v. THE BOROUGH OF EAST NEWARK, RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1915-03-01
Citations: 87 N.J.L. 324
Docket Number: 
Parties: THE MAYOR AND ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF PATERSON, APPELLANT, v. THE BOROUGH OF EAST NEWARK, RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 87
Pages: 324–324

Head Matter:
THE MAYOR AND ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF PATERSON, APPELLANT, v. THE BOROUGH OF EAST NEWARK, RESPONDENT.
Argued November 19, 1914—
Decided March 1, 1915.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, in which court the following per curiam was filed:
“Per curiami—The proceedings are affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion in the case of Paterson v. Glen Ridge, No.’ 290, of the same term.”
For the appellant, Edward F. Merrey, William B. Gourley and John W. Griggs.
For the respondent, Gilbert Collins.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review will he affirmed for the reasons given hy us in our opinions delivered at the present term in the cases of The Mayor and Aldermen of Paterson v. The Mayor and Aldermen of Jersey City, ante p. 163; and The Mayor and Aldermen of Paterson v. Town of Kearny, post p. 327.
. For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Black, Bogert, Vre-DENBURGH, WHITE, HEPPENHEIMER, WILLIAMS, JJ. 12.
For reversal—None.