Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juvenal GUTIERREZ-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-09-04
Citations: 615 F. App'x 899
Docket Number: No. 15-10013
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juvenal GUTIERREZ-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 615
Pages: 899–899

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juvenal GUTIERREZ-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-10013.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 2, 2015.
Filed Sept. 4, 2015.
Fernanda Carolina Escalante, Assistant United States, USPX-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Two Renaissance Square, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Florence Bruemmer, Law Offices of Florence M. Bruemmer, PC, Anthem, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Juvenal Gutierrez-Garcia appeals from the district court's judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 57-month sentence for being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Gutierrez-Garcia's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Gutierrez-Garcia the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Gutierrez-Garcia has waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Because the record discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the appeal waiver, we dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir.2009).
Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.