Case Name: Disciplinary Counsel v. Hale
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2016-07-25
Citations: 150 Ohio St. 3d 1244
Docket Number: No. 2013-1622
Parties: Disciplinary Counsel v. Hale.
Judges: O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 150
Pages: 1244–1244

Head Matter:
Disciplinary Counsel v. Hale.
2016-Ohio-5079.]
(No. 2013-1622
Submitted July 21, 2016
Decided July 25, 2016.)

Opinion:
{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Harland Hanna Hale, Attorney Registration No. 0023464, last known business address in Columbus, Ohio.
{¶2} The court coming now to .consider its order of November 18, 2014, wherein the court, pursuant to former Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of six months, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24).
(¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.
{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2).
{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Hale, 141 Ohio St.3d 518, 2014-Ohio-5053, 26 N.E.3d 785.
O'Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O'Neill, JJ., concur.