Case Name: STATE, STEPHEN B. RANSOM, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. DANIEL BLACK, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1901
Citations: 65 N.J.L. 688
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE, STEPHEN B. RANSOM, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. DANIEL BLACK, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 65
Pages: 688–688

Head Matter:
STATE, STEPHEN B. RANSOM, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. DANIEL BLACK, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
On error to the Supreme Court. The opinions of the Supreme Court are reported in 25 Vroom 446.
For the plaintiff in error, Stephen B. Ransom, pro se.
For the defendant in error, Thomas J. Kennedy.,
The writ of error in this case was argued at the June Term, 1893, and then decided, but no opinion or memorandum was filed and judgment in accordance with the decision of the court was not entered by counsel. The result reached being a matter of public importance, the court has ordered the judgment to be entered in accordance with the vote of the court, and the decision to be printed in the reports.—Rep.

Opinion:
Pee Curiam.
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Mr. Justice Dixon. 25 Vroom 459.
For affirmance on opinion of Dixon, J.—McGill (Chancellor), Beasley (Chief Justice), Abbett, Brown, Clement, Pi-ielps, Smith. 7.
For affirmance on opinion of Reed, J.—Depue, Magie, Van Syckel, Bogert, Krueger. 5.