Case Name: Wiseman, Director of Internal Revenue for the District of Oklahoma v. Barby et ux.; Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co. et al.; Hettleman et al. v. Chicago Law Institute et al.; McManigal v. Simon et al.; Electric Furnace Corp. v. Deering Milliken Research Corp.; Hicks et al. v. Physical Therapists Examining Board for the District of Columbia; Williams v. United States; Walker v. Wainwright, Corrections Director; Harris v. Rhay, Penitentiary Superintendent; Elksnis v. United States; Mancilla v. United States et al.; Butterfield v. Gazelle
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1968-04-22
Citations: 390 U.S. 1036
Docket Number: No. 871; No. 937; No. 961; No. 962; No. 980; No. 1027; No. 672; No. 786; No. 879; No. 896; No. 1017; No. 1117
Parties: Wiseman, Director of Internal Revenue for the District of Oklahoma v. Barby et ux., Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co. et al., Hettleman et al. v. Chicago Law Institute et al., McManigal v. Simon et al., Electric Furnace Corp. v. Deering Milliken Research Corp., Hicks et al. v. Physical Therapists Examining Board for the District of Columbia, Williams v. United States, Walker v. Wainwright, Corrections Director, Harris v. Rhay, Penitentiary Superintendent, Elksnis v. United States, Mancilla v. United States et al., Butterfield v. Gazelle,
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 390
Pages: 1036–1036

Head Matter:
No. 871.
No. 937.
No. 961.
No. 962.
No. 980.
No. 1027.
No. 672,
No. 786,
No. 879,
No. 896,
No. 1017,
No. 1117,
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Wiseman, Director of Internal Revenue for the District of Oklahoma v. Barby et ux., Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co. et al., Hettleman et al. v. Chicago Law Institute et al., McManigal v. Simon et al., Electric Furnace Corp. v. Deering Milliken Research Corp., Hicks et al. v. Physical Therapists Examining Board for the District of Columbia, Williams v. United States, Walker v. Wainwright, Corrections Director, Harris v. Rhay, Penitentiary Superintendent, Elksnis v. United States, Mancilla v. United States et al., Butterfield v. Gazelle,

Opinion:
ante, p. 339;
ante, p. 979;
ante, p. 338;
ante, p. 980;
ante, p. 949;
ante, p.987;
ante, p. 960;
ante, p. 335;
ante, p. 963;
ante, p. 990;
ante, p. 982; and
ante, p. 985. Petitions for rehearing denied.