Case Name: In the Matter of HILL DREDGING CORPORATION, Debtor. The BOARDWALK NATIONAL BANK, Appellant, v. George F. KUGLER, Jr., Trustee for Hill Dredging Corporation, Debtor, Carl Risley and Helen M. Wright, Respondents
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1966-08-09
Citations: 363 F.2d 875
Docket Number: No. 15588
Parties: In the Matter of HILL DREDGING CORPORATION, Debtor. The BOARDWALK NATIONAL BANK, Appellant, v. George F. KUGLER, Jr., Trustee for Hill Dredging Corporation, Debtor, Carl Ris-ley and Helen M. Wright, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 363
Pages: 875–876

Head Matter:
In the Matter of HILL DREDGING CORPORATION, Debtor. The BOARDWALK NATIONAL BANK, Appellant, v. George F. KUGLER, Jr., Trustee for Hill Dredging Corporation, Debtor, Carl Ris-ley and Helen M. Wright, Respondents.
No. 15588.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued March 7, 1966.
Decided Aug. 9, 1966.
John R. Armstrong, Atlantic City, N. J. (Kirkman, Mulligan, Bell & Armstrong, Atlantic City, N. J., on the brief), for appellant, Boardwalk Nat. Bank.
Clarence P. Reberkenny, Camden, N. J. (Hyland & Reberkenny, Camden, N. J., for respondent, George F. Kugler, Jr., Trustee for Hill Dredging Corporation, on the brief).
W. Louis Bossle, Camden, N. J., for appellees, Carl F. Risley and Helen M. Wright.
Before SMITH and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges, and MILLER, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This appeal is from an order entered by the court below in a bankruptcy pro ceeding. The matter came before the referee in bankruptcy on the Bank's petition seeking the modification of an order entered on December 15, 1964, and a redetermination of the balance allegedly due on a secured claim. After hearing the referee allowed an interest adjustment but otherwise denied the Bank's claim for relief and entered an order accordingly. This order was affirmed by the District Court.
We have carefully reviewed the record and find no error. In fact, the Bank's claim for relief was totally without merit.
The order of the court below will be affirmed.