Case Name: MARY E. MUNSON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. H. Y. JOHNSON, J. A. NESBITT AND WILLIAM MILLER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1933-04-28
Citations: 110 N.J.L. 564
Docket Number: 
Parties: MARY E. MUNSON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. H. Y. JOHNSON, J. A. NESBITT AND WILLIAM MILLER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 110
Pages: 564–565

Head Matter:
MARY E. MUNSON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. H. Y. JOHNSON, J. A. NESBITT AND WILLIAM MILLER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Argued February 15, 1933
Decided April 28, 1933.
For the appellants, Samuel II. Nelson (Thomas L. Par-sonnet,, of counsel).
For the respondent, Schneider •& Schneider (Jacob Schneider, on the brief).

Opinion:
Pee Cdeiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Teen-chard, Parked, Lloyd, Case, Heiier, Yan Buskiek, Kays, Dear, Wells, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.