Case Name: GOTTHARD J. ZURCHER, TRADING AS GARAMOUNT MACHINE COMPANY, AND HARRY P. HALLER, AND PATERSON MACHINE CO., INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. MODERN PLASTIC MACHINERY CORP., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE LICENSED TO DO BUSINESS IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1953-06-15
Citations: 12 N.J. 465
Docket Number: 
Parties: GOTTHARD J. ZURCHER, TRADING AS GARAMOUNT MACHINE COMPANY, AND HARRY P. HALLER, AND PATERSON MACHINE CO., INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. MODERN PLASTIC MACHINERY CORP., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE LICENSED TO DO BUSINESS IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: For affirmance — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Oliphant, Wachenfeld, Burling, Jacobs and Brennan— 6.
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 12
Pages: 465–465

Head Matter:
GOTTHARD J. ZURCHER, TRADING AS GARAMOUNT MACHINE COMPANY, AND HARRY P. HALLER, AND PATERSON MACHINE CO., INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. MODERN PLASTIC MACHINERY CORP., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE LICENSED TO DO BUSINESS IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Argued June 8, 1953
Decided June 15, 1953.
Mr. Ervan F. Kushner argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Brenman and Susser, attorneys).
Mr. A. Leo Bohl and Mr. Forster W. Freeman, Jr., argued the cause for the respondents (Messrs. Freeman, Buttermore & Freeman, Mr. Peter Hofstra and Mr. John A. Masiello, attorneys).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Bigelow in the court below.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Oliphant, Wachenfeld, Burling, Jacobs and Brennan— 6.
For reversal — Justice Heher — 1.