Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Perry M., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1985-04-08
Citations: 110 A.D.2d 718
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Perry M., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 110
Pages: 718–718

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Perry M., Appellant.

Opinion:
Defendant's claim regarding the sufficiency of the plea allocution is unpreserved for appellate review as a matter of law (CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636; People v De Santis, 108 AD2d 821; People v Mattocks, 100 AD2d 944). Moreover, reversal is not warranted in the interest of justice because the record establishes that defendant knowingly and voluntarily pleaded guilty (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9; People v Carrisquello, 106 AD2d 513). Nor do we perceive any basis for concluding that the sentence, which was the product of a negotiated plea, requires modification in the interest of justice (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Thompson and O'Connor, JJ., concur.