Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Martin HILLERIO-MIRANDA, a.k.a. Martin Hillera, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-12-13
Citations: 706 F. App'x 651
Docket Number: No. 17-12186 Non-Argument Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Martin HILLERIO-MIRANDA, a.k.a. Martin Hillera, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JORDAN, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 706
Pages: 651–651

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Martin HILLERIO-MIRANDA, a.k.a. Martin Hillera, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 17-12186 Non-Argument Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
(December 13, 2017)
Carol Herman, Emily M. Smachetti, U.S. Attorney Service—Southern District of Florida, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, Robert Benjamin Cornell, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Ian McDonald, Paul Michael Rashkind, Michael Caruso, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Miami, FL, for Defendant-Appellant
Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JORDAN, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Martin Hillerio-Miranda pled guilty to one count of unlawful entry into the United States after having been previously removed in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(1). The district court sentenced Mr. Hillerio-Miranda to 18 months' imprisonment—the lowest possible sentence in the advisory Sentencing Guidelines range—and a supervised release term of three years. Mr. Hillerio-Miranda argues on appeal that his custodial sentence is substantively unreasonable.
Mr, Hillerio-Miranda did not move to expedite his appeal, and Bureau of Prisons records show that he was released from prison on November 3, 2017. Because Mr. Hillerio-Miranda only contests his custodial sentence, we conclude that his appeal is moot because we cannot grant any effective relief. See United States v. Farmer, 923 F.2d 1557, 1568 (11th Cir. 1991).
APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT.