Case Name: DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS, INC., a Delaware corporation, Appellant, v. Gary Michael PAULZAK, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1994-04-07
Citations: 634 So. 2d 321
Docket Number: No. 93-3688
Parties: DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS, INC., a Delaware corporation, Appellant, v. Gary Michael PAULZAK, Appellee.
Judges: ERVIN, BARFIELD, and BENTON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 634
Pages: 321–322

Head Matter:
DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS, INC., a Delaware corporation, Appellant, v. Gary Michael PAULZAK, Appellee.
No. 93-3688.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
April 7, 1994.
A.G. Condon, Jr. and Karen 0. Emmanuel, of Emmanuel, Sheppard & Condon, Pensacola, for appellant.
Ross M. Goodman, of Levin, Middlebrooks, Mabie, Thomas, Mayes & Mitchell, Pensacola, and John L. Fiveash, Jr. of Fiveash & Associates, Pensacola, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. (Dean Witter) appeals an order denying a motion to compel arbitration. Dean Witter correctly asserts that the Uniform Application for Securities Industry Registration (Form U-4) agreement executed by the parties is applicable and that the unambiguous language of the Form U-4 agreement requires that the dispute between Dean Witter and Gary Paulzak be arbitrated under the rules, constitutions, or by-laws of the organizations indicated in the agreement. Accordingly, the order appealed is REVERSED.
ERVIN, BARFIELD, and BENTON, JJ., concur.