Case Name: S.C.H. REALTY, INC., Appellant, v. SOUTH BAYSHORE DEVELOPMENT CORP., C. Robert Cusick, L. Ronald Capozzoli and Richard Vazza, Edward J. DeBartolo, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1985-01-02
Citations: 460 So. 2d 1031
Docket Number: No. 84-1153
Parties: S.C.H. REALTY, INC., Appellant, v. SOUTH BAYSHORE DEVELOPMENT CORP., C. Robert Cusick, L. Ronald Capozzoli and Richard Vazza, Edward J. DeBartolo, Appellee.
Judges: Before NESBITT, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 460
Pages: 1031–1032

Head Matter:
S.C.H. REALTY, INC., Appellant, v. SOUTH BAYSHORE DEVELOPMENT CORP., C. Robert Cusick, L. Ronald Capozzoli and Richard Vazza, Edward J. DeBartolo, Appellee.
No. 84-1153.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan. 2, 1985.
Lapidus & Stettin and Richard Lapidus, Miami, for appellant. .
Smith & Mandler and Mitchell Mandler and Patricia M. Silver, Miami Beach, Wright & Carauana, Miami, for appellee.
Before NESBITT, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the final summary judgment against appellant, S.C.H. Realty, Inc. [S.C.H.] upon a finding that seller-principal, South Bayshore Development Corporation [South Bayshore], is not liable to subagent-broker S.C.H. in light of the undisputed evidence in the record indicating that South Bayshore neither directly contracted with S.C.H. to retain its services nor authorized or ratified the employment of S.C.H. Whidden v. Morse, 213 So.2d 625 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968).
Affirmed.