Case Name: State, ex rel. Shoemaker, v. Franklin County Court of Appeals
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1989-02-24
Citations: 41 Ohio St. 3d 724
Docket Number: 89-222
Parties: State, ex rel. Shoemaker, v. Franklin County Court of Appeals.
Judges: Sweeney and H. Brown, JJ., dissent.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 41
Pages: 724–724

Head Matter:
Friday, February 24, 1989
MOTION DOCKET
89-222.
State, ex rel. Shoemaker, v. Franklin County Court of Appeals.

Opinion:
In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition. Upon consideration of relator's motion for alternative writ, IT IS ORDERED by the court, effective February 22,1989, that said motion be, and the same is hereby, granted and that respondents, Judges and Referees of the Franklin County Court of Appeals, show cause on or before March 14,1989 as to why such a writ of prohibition should not issue.
Sweeney and H. Brown, JJ., dissent.