Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Timothy ADAMS, a/k/a Rodney Clark, a/k/a Smitt, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-09-27
Citations: 19 F. App'x 133
Docket Number: No. 01-6822
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Timothy ADAMS, a/k/a Rodney Clark, a/k/a Smitt, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before LUTTIG, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 19
Pages: 133–133

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Timothy ADAMS, a/k/a Rodney Clark, a/k/a Smitt, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 01-6822.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 20, 2001.
Decided Sept. 27, 2001.
Timothy Adams, pro se. David Bernard Smith, Greensboro, NC, for appellee.
Before LUTTIG, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Timothy Adams appeals from the district court's order denying his motion filed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(b), (c) seeking reconsideration of the denial of his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the denial of his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Adams, Nos. CR-94-302; CA-97-1225-1 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 24, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.