Case Name: CITY OF NEWARK, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, PROSECUTOR-RESPONDENT, v. J. H. THAYER MARTIN, STATE TAX COMMISSIONER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1941-06-26
Citations: 127 N.J.L. 26
Docket Number: 
Parties: CITY OF NEWARK, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, PROSECUTOR-RESPONDENT, v. J. H. THAYER MARTIN, STATE TAX COMMISSIONER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 127
Pages: 26–27

Head Matter:
CITY OF NEWARK, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, PROSECUTOR-RESPONDENT, v. J. H. THAYER MARTIN, STATE TAX COMMISSIONER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Argued October 17, 1940 —
Decided June 26, 1941.
For the appellant Town of Westfield, cities of Elizabeth, Burlington, New Brunswick, Hackensack, towns of Kearny, Montclair, Township of Millburn in the County of Essex and Borough of Somerville, Herbert J. Hannoch. .
For the appellant City of Paterson, John F. Evans.
For the appellant City of Plainfield, William Newcorn.
For the appellant Town of Nutley, William F. Gorman.
For the appellant City of Summit, Frederick G. Kentz.
For the appellant City of Trenton, Louis Josephson.
Of counsel for the foregoing appellants, Herbert J. Hannoch and Morris Weinstein.
For the respondent, James F. X. O’Brien (Joseph A. Ward. of counsel).

Opinion:
Pee Cubiam.
These cases are ruled by the determination reached by this court in the case of Jersey City et al. v. Martin, expressed in an opinion filed this day, 127 N. J. L. 18; and the judgments are accordingly reversed.
For affirmance — None.
For'reversal — -The Chancelloe, Chibe Justice, Paeicee, Case, Donges, Hehee, Peeseie, Dbae, Wells, WolesKeil, Hague, JJ. 11.