Case Name: WILLIAM DODD, EDWARD DODD, AND MARION ELIZABETH DODD, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, CROSS-APPELLANTS, v. GEORGE R. COPELAND, GEORGE D. COPELAND, AND SAMUEL J. COX, DEFENDANTS, SAMUEL J. COX AND UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND, APPELLANTS, CROSS-RESPONDENTS
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1968-11-04
Citations: 52 N.J. 537
Docket Number: 
Parties: WILLIAM DODD, EDWARD DODD, AND MARION ELIZABETH DODD, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, CROSS-APPELLANTS, v. GEORGE R. COPELAND, GEORGE D. COPELAND, AND SAMUEL J. COX, DEFENDANTS, SAMUEL J. COX AND UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND, APPELLANTS, CROSS-RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 52
Pages: 537–537

Head Matter:
WILLIAM DODD, EDWARD DODD, AND MARION ELIZABETH DODD, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, CROSS-APPELLANTS, v. GEORGE R. COPELAND, GEORGE D. COPELAND, AND SAMUEL J. COX, DEFENDANTS, SAMUEL J. COX AND UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND, APPELLANTS, CROSS-RESPONDENTS.
Argued October 7, 1968 —
Decided November 4, 1968.
Mr. Bruce D. Herrigel argued the cause for appellants, cross-respondents (Messrs. Herrigel and Herrigel, attorneys).
Mr. John J. Trombadore argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents, cross-appellants (Messrs. Trombadore and Trombadore, attorneys).

Opinion:
The opinion of the court was delivered
Per Curiam.
The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed for the reasons given in the majority opinion, 99 N.J. Super. 481 (1968).
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintbaub and Justices Jacobs, Ebancis, Peoctoe, Hall, Schettino and Haneman — 7.
For reversal — Fone.