Case Name: Dunnell v. Dunnell et al.
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1910-04-15
Citations: 134 Ga. 322
Docket Number: 
Parties: Dunnell v. Dunnell et al.
Judges: All the Justices concur.
Reporter: Georgia Reports
Volume: 134
Pages: 322–323

Head Matter:
Dunnell v. Dunnell et al.

Opinion:
Lumpkin, J.
1. The equitable petition was not subject to the demurrer filed by the defendant.
2. When considered in the light of the pleadings, the evidence, and the entire charge of the court, the excerpts of the charge complained of do not require a new trial.
April 15, 1910.
Equitable petition. Before Judge Worrill. Early superior court.
May 21, 1909.
Calhoun & Rambo, for plaintiff in error.
W. D. Sheffield, and Pottle & Glesssner, contra.
3. The charge covered the substantial issues in the case; and if more specific instructions on some particular point were desired, they should have been duly requested.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.