Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fermin OCAMPO-SOLANO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-04-21
Citations: 323 F. App'x 528
Docket Number: No. 08-30095
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Fermin OCAMPO-SOLANO, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: GRABER, GOULD and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 323
Pages: 528–529

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Fermin OCAMPO-SOLANO, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 08-30095.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 13, 2009.
Filed April 21, 2009.
Charles Franklin Gorder, Jr., Assistant U.S., Stephen Francis Peifer, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Portland, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Kelly R. Beckley, Beckley Law Firm, P.C., Eugene, OR, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: GRABER, GOULD and BEA, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Fermin Ocampo-Solano appeals from the 18-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Ocam-po-Solano's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's order is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.