Case Name: Philip Grossman, Respondent, v. Aaron J. Schindel et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Domestic Mills, Appellants; Aaron Schindel et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Domestic Mills, Appellants, v. Philip Grossman, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1950-12-12
Citations: 277 A.D.2d 1104
Docket Number: 
Parties: Philip Grossman, Respondent, v. Aaron J. Schindel et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Domestic Mills, Appellants. Aaron Schindel et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Domestic Mills, Appellants, v. Philip Grossman, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 277
Pages: 1104–1104

Head Matter:
Philip Grossman, Respondent, v. Aaron J. Schindel et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Domestic Mills, Appellants. Aaron Schindel et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Domestic Mills, Appellants, v. Philip Grossman, Respondent.

Opinion:
Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with $10 costs. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See 276 App. Div. 896.]