Case Name: TATLER, INC., APPELLANT, v. E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY, RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1941-04-25
Citations: 126 N.J.L. 369
Docket Number: 
Parties: TATLER, INC., APPELLANT, v. E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY, RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 126
Pages: 369–370

Head Matter:
TATLER, INC., APPELLANT, v. E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY, RESPONDENT.
Submitted February 14, 1941
Decided April 25, 1941.
For the appellant, Crawford Jamieson.
For the respondent, Katzenbach, Gildea & Rudner.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Ti-ie Chancellor, Parker, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Colie, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.