Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ernest LOPEZ, also known as Neto, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-09-14
Citations: 488 F. App'x 856
Docket Number: No. 11-51268
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ernest LOPEZ, also known as Neto, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WIENER, ELROD, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 488
Pages: 856–857

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ernest LOPEZ, also known as Neto, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-51268
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Sept. 14, 2012.
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Dexter E. Gilford, Law Offices of Dexter E. Gilford, Austin, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before WIENER, ELROD, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Ernest Lopez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Lopez has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Lopez's response. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.