Case Name: 2470 Cadillac Resources, Inc., et al., Appellants, v. DHL Express (USA), Inc., Respondent, et al., Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2012-02-28
Citations: 92 A.D.3d 618
Docket Number: 
Parties: 2470 Cadillac Resources, Inc., et al., Appellants, v DHL Express (USA), Inc., Respondent, et al., Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 92
Pages: 618–619

Head Matter:
2470 Cadillac Resources, Inc., et al., Appellants, v DHL Express (USA), Inc., Respondent, et al., Defendant.
[938 NYS2d 886]

Opinion:
The IAS Court properly determined that defendant's counterclaims are not new evidence that would alter its prior determination (CPLR 2221 [e] [2]). Indeed, the counterclaims restate allegations that were before the court on the prior motion and do not constitute an admission, or evidence, that plaintiffs are third-party beneficiaries of the reseller agreement (see 2470 Cadillac Resources, Inc. v DHL Express [USA], Inc., 84 AD3d 697, 698 [2011]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Andrias, Catterson, Abdus-Salaam and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.