Case Name: Rafael Cornelio BRITO, a/k/a Rafael C. Matos, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; John Ashcroft, Attorney General; Richard L. Williams, United States District Judge, Richmond Division, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-01-02
Citations: 22 F. App'x 336
Docket Number: No. 01-7444
Parties: Rafael Cornelio BRITO, a/k/a Rafael C. Matos, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; John Ashcroft, Attorney General; Richard L. Williams, United States District Judge, Richmond Division, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 22
Pages: 336–336

Head Matter:
Rafael Cornelio BRITO, a/k/a Rafael C. Matos, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; John Ashcroft, Attorney General; Richard L. Williams, United States District Judge, Richmond Division, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 01-7444.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 20, 2001.
Decided Jan. 2, 2002.
Rafael Cornelio Brito, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Rafael Cornelio Brito appeals the district court's dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) action because he failed to pay a filing fee or petition the court to proceed in forma pauperis. After Brito noted this appeal, the district court granted Brito's motion to reconsider, vacated judgment, and reinstated his § 1983 action. Brito v. Department of Justice, No. CA-01-384 (E.D.Va. Sept. 24, 2001). We therefore dismiss the present appeal as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.