Case Name: MISS GEORGIANA M. ROSTRUP, Individually, and as Testamentary Executrix of the Estate of Andrew Rostrup, vs. MRS. NANCY ROSTRUP, Wife of Joseph Dingman, et. als.
Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1905-01-23
Citations: 2 Teiss. 232
Docket Number: No. 3638
Parties: MISS GEORGIANA M. ROSTRUP, Individually, and as Testamentary Executrix of the Estate of Andrew Rostrup, vs. MRS. NANCY ROSTRUP, Wife of Joseph Dingman, et. als.
Judges: 
Reporter: Decisions, Court of Appeal, parish of Orleans (Teissier)
Volume: 2
Pages: 232–236

Head Matter:
No. 3638.
(Court of Appeal, Parish of Orleans.)
MISS GEORGIANA M. ROSTRUP, Individually, and as Testamentary Executrix of the Estate of Andrew Rostrup, vs. MRS. NANCY ROSTRUP, Wife of Joseph Dingman, et. als.
Appeal from 28th Judicial District Court, Parish of Jefferson,
J. B. Rosser, Jr., for Plaintiff and Appellant.
PI. N. Gautier, for Defendant and Appellee.
On Motion to Dismiss.
1. Where the grounds of á motion to dismiss are apparently interwoven with the merits of the cause and require for proper decision atl examination of the whole record, such motion will be denied in limine without prejudice to mover’s rights after a hearing.

Opinion:
DUFO'UR, J.
The appellant, adjudicatee at partition sale, was made respondent in a rule to show cause why the property should not be sold a la folie endúre because of her failure to comply with the adjudication.
A motion to dismiss is made on two grounds;
1st. That the judgment is a consent one from which no appeal lies,
Slid, That it does not work irreparable injury.
The judgment recites that it was rendered "considering the consent of all parties in interest," but does not recite the presence of the appellant or he.r counsel at the trial, and no written, consent is apparent.
An assignment of errors presents questions as to the legality of the judgment on the face of the papers, and proper decision of the issues would require an examination of the whole record.
Under such circumstances, the .proper practice is to deny the motion to dismiss in limine without prejudice to appellee's right to urge same at the hearing of the cause on the merits.
January 23rd, 1905.
Á consent for judgment may he either written or Verbal, and, if written, the instrument should form part of the record and the judgment should re'cite that the consent was so made; i'f verbal, it should he made "in open Court," and the omission so to state in the judgment strikes it with nullity.
Motion denied without prejudice.