Case Name: McFall v. Burley Tobacco Growers' Co-operative Association
Court: Kentucky Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Kentucky
Decision Date: 1929-05-17
Citations: 229 Ky. 537
Docket Number: 
Parties: McFall v. Burley Tobacco Growers’ Co-operative Association.
Judges: 
Reporter: Kentucky Reports
Volume: 229
Pages: 537–538

Head Matter:
McFall v. Burley Tobacco Growers’ Co-operative Association.
(Decided May 17, 1929.)
HOBBS & HANSEN for appellant.
ROBERT H. HAYS, H. A. SCHOBERTH and AARON SAPIRO for appellee.

Opinion:
Opinion of the Court by
Chief Justice MoCandless
—Affirming.
On this motion for an appeal the validity of the Bingham Act (chapter 1, Acts 1922; sections 883fl-883f33, Ky. St. Supp. 1928) is again assailed. All of the questions raised have heretofore been considered by this court and decided adversely to appellant's contention. See Liberty Warehouse Co. v. Burley Tob. G. C. Ass'n, 208 Ky. 643, 271 S. W. 695, affirmed in Id., 276 U. S. 71, 48 S. Ct. 291, 72 L. Ed. 473; Potter v. Dark Tob. G. C. Ass'n, 201 Ky. 441, 257 S. W. 33; City of Owensboro v. Dark Tob. G. Ass'n, 222 Ky. 164, 300 S. W. 350; Feagain v. Dark Tob. G. C. Ass'n, 202 Ky. 801, 261 S. W. 607; Dark Tob. G. C. Ass'n v. Daniels, 215 Ky. 67, 284 S. W. 399.
So much is admitted by the defendant, but he is asking that these cases be reviewed and overruled. Without elaboration it may be said that the court has considered the matter and adheres to the conclusions laid down in the opinions above cited.
Wherefore the motion for appeal is denied, and the judgment is affirmed.