Case Name: Salvatore Pelliccio et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. David Axelrod, Respondent, and Andrew P. O'Rourke et al., Respondents-Appellants. (Action No. 1.); Industrial Refuse Systems, Inc., et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. Andrew P. O'Rourke et al., Respondents-Appellants. (Action No. 2.)
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1987-06-15
Citations: 131 A.D.2d 650
Docket Number: 
Parties: Salvatore Pelliccio et al., Appellants-Respondents, v David Axelrod, Respondent, and Andrew P. O’Rourke et al., Respondents-Appellants. (Action No. 1.) Industrial Refuse Systems, Inc., et al., Appellants-Respondents, v Andrew P. O’Rourke et al., Respondents-Appellants. (Action No. 2.)
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 131
Pages: 650–651

Head Matter:
Salvatore Pelliccio et al., Appellants-Respondents, v David Axelrod, Respondent, and Andrew P. O’Rourke et al., Respondents-Appellants. (Action No. 1.) Industrial Refuse Systems, Inc., et al., Appellants-Respondents, v Andrew P. O’Rourke et al., Respondents-Appellants. (Action No. 2.)

Opinion:
Motion by the respondents-appellants on their cross appeal from an order and judgment of the Supreme Court (Coppola, J.), dated December 4, 1986, inter alia, for leave to submit a postargument motion and for this court to take judicial notice of Local Laws, 1987, No. 8 of the County of Westchester.
Ordered that the motion is granted, only to the extent that the respondents-appellants are granted leave to submit the motion and this court has taken judicial notice of Local Laws, 1987, No. 8 of the County of Westchester, and the motion is otherwise denied. Bracken, J. P., Weinstein, Rubin and Harwood, JJ., concur. [See, 134 Misc 2d 45.]