Case Name: Gary Kerpa v. A & A Brothers, Inc., et al.
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1987-12-22
Citations: 13 Conn. App. 807
Docket Number: 5406
Parties: Gary Kerpa v. A & A Brothers, Inc., et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Appellate Reports
Volume: 13
Pages: 745–745

Head Matter:
Gary Kerpa v. A & A Brothers, Inc., et al.
(5406)
Spallone, Bieluch and Stoughton, Js.
Argued December 17 —
decision released December 22, 1987
Gary Kerpa, pro se, the appellant (plaintiff).
Theodore R. Tyma, with whom, on the brief, was Paul V. McNamara, for the appellee (named defendant).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The plaintiff's first, second and sixth claims of error were not raised in the trial court; consequently, we will not consider those claims. The plaintiff's third, fourth and fifth elaims of error invoke the discretionary function of the court. Our review of the record, transcript and briefs fails to disclose any abuse of such discretion.
There is no error.