Case Name: RUDOLPH LINDEMANN, RESPONDENT, v. S. S. KRESGE COMPANY, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1940-01-25
Citations: 124 N.J.L. 129
Docket Number: 
Parties: RUDOLPH LINDEMANN, RESPONDENT, v. S. S. KRESGE COMPANY, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 124
Pages: 129–129

Head Matter:
RUDOLPH LINDEMANN, RESPONDENT, v. S. S. KRESGE COMPANY, APPELLANT.
Argued October 17, 1939
Decided January 25, 1940.
For the appellant, Edwards, Smith & Dawson.
For the respondent, Collins & Corbin.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Trenchard, Donges, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 10.
For reversal—Case, Perskie, JJ. 2.