Case Name: Ross CASE, Appellant, v. DAVID SHERMAN CORP., et al., Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-08-28
Citations: 53 S.W.3d 255
Docket Number: No. ED 79171
Parties: Ross CASE, Appellant, v. DAVID SHERMAN CORP., et al., Respondent.
Judges: Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, SR. and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 53
Pages: 255–255

Head Matter:
Ross CASE, Appellant, v. DAVID SHERMAN CORP., et al., Respondent.
No. ED 79171.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Aug. 28, 2001.
Faiq M. Mihlar, Dean Christianson, Schuchat, Cook & Werner, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Todd D. Hilliker, Holtkamp, Liese, Chil-dress & Schultz, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.
Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, SR. and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Ross Case, appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying his compensation. We Affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and find the judgment is supported by substantial and competent evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence based on the record as a whole. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).