Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Samuel Clive PHILLIPS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-08-21
Citations: 291 F. App'x 524
Docket Number: No. 08-6892
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Samuel Clive PHILLIPS, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 291
Pages: 524–525

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Samuel Clive PHILLIPS, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 08-6892.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 14, 2008.
Decided: Aug. 21, 2008.
Samuel Clive Phillips, Appellant pro se. Kevin Michael Comstock, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Samuel Clive Phillips appeals the district court's order denying his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Phillips, No. 2:93-cr-00131-HCM-5 (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 29, 2008; entered May 2, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.