Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Steven J. THEBEAU, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-01-08
Citations: 64 S.W.3d 849
Docket Number: No. ED 79293
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Steven J. THEBEAU, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 64
Pages: 849–849

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Steven J. THEBEAU, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 79293.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Jan. 8, 2002.
Rosalynn Koch, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, MO, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Nicole E. Gorovsky, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Steven J. Thebeau (Defendant) appeals from his conviction for second degree burglary in violation of Section 569.170 and misdemeanor stealing in violation of Section 570.030. Defendant argues that the trial court erroneously admitted photographs that the State failed to disclose during discovery. Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude that the trial court did not err. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
. Unless otherwise noted, all statutory refer-enees are to RSMo 2000.