Case Name: Wayne BEATON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1997-12-31
Citations: 702 So. 2d 646
Docket Number: No. 96-4032
Parties: Wayne BEATON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: POLEN, STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 702
Pages: 646–647

Head Matter:
Wayne BEATON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 96-4032.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Dec. 31, 1997.
Charles W. Musgrove, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Myra J. Fried, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for ap-pellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Wayne Beaton, who was convicted of attempted burglary of a dwelling, appeals his sentence based on his claim that the trial court erred in allowing the state to bolster the victim's identification on voir dire and direct examination. He concedes, however, that his attorney failed to raise objections to such comments below. As he failed to prop erly preserve these arguments for appellate review, we affirm.
POLEN, STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur.