Case Name: David Margulies et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of A. M. J. Novelty Co., et al., Respondents, v. Irving Mittlemark et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Sixth Avenue & Thirty Ninth Street Associates, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1956-11-13
Citations: 2 A.D.2d 883
Docket Number: 
Parties: David Margulies et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of A. M. J. Novelty Co., et al., Respondents, v. Irving Mittlemark et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Sixth Avenue & Thirty Ninth Street Associates, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 2
Pages: 883–883

Head Matter:
David Margulies et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of A. M. J. Novelty Co., et al., Respondents, v. Irving Mittlemark et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Sixth Avenue & Thirty Ninth Street Associates, Appellants.

Opinion:
Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellants and the motion granted (Edward Tarr, Inc. v. Phoenix Pubs., 1 A D 2d 189, affd. 1 N Y 2d 870), and judgment is directed to be entered in favor of the defendants dismissing the complaint herein, with costs. The affidavits raise no issue of fact with respect to the tenants' agreement to remove after 16 months, a period longer than that authorized by the statute. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Botein, Rabin, Frank and Yalente, JJ.