Case Name: The State ex rel. Jackson, Appellant, v. Lanzinger, Judge, Appellee
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1992-11-18
Citations: 65 Ohio St. 3d 132
Docket Number: No. 91-2266
Parties: The State ex rel. Jackson, Appellant, v. Lanzinger, Judge, Appellee.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 65
Pages: 132–133

Head Matter:
The State ex rel. Jackson, Appellant, v. Lanzinger, Judge, Appellee.
[Cite as State ex rel. Jackson v. Lanzinger (1992), 65 Ohio St.3d 132.]
(No. 91-2266 —
Submitted October 13, 1992 —
Decided November 18, 1992.)
James L. Jackson, pro se.
Anthony G. Pizza, Prosecuting Attorney, and Michael C. Mota, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Opinion:
The cause is affirmed for the reason stated in the court of appeals' opinion which denied appellant's complaint in mandamus for a copy of the transcript of his trial proceedings that "a true and accurate copy of the transcript of proceedings was [already] provided" to him.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.