Case Name: ESTATE OF Bruce H. BARTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ADT SECURITY SERVICES PENSION PLAN, a pension plan; Tyco International Management Company, as plan sponsor; Tyco International Management Company, LLC, Administrative Committee, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-09-20
Citations: 837 F.3d 1014
Docket Number: No. 13-56379
Parties: ESTATE OF Bruce H. BARTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ADT SECURITY SERVICES PENSION PLAN, a pension plan; Tyco International Management Company, as plan sponsor; Tyco International Management Company, LLC, Administrative Committee, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: ALEX KOZINSKI, SANDRA S. IKUTA, and JOHN B. OWENS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 837
Pages: 1014–1016

Head Matter:
ESTATE OF Bruce H. BARTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ADT SECURITY SERVICES PENSION PLAN, a pension plan; Tyco International Management Company, as plan sponsor; Tyco International Management Company, LLC, Administrative Committee, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 13-56379
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Filed September 20, 2016
Morris S. Getzels (argued), Morris S. Getzels Law Office, Tarzana, California, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Stuart D. Tochner (argued), Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C., Los Angeles, California, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: ALEX KOZINSKI, SANDRA S. IKUTA, and JOHN B. OWENS, Circuit Judges.
Dissent by Judge N.R. SMITH
The Estate of Bruce H. Barton is substituted as Plaintiff-Appellant pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 43(a).

Opinion:
ORDER
Judges Kozinski and Owens have voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc. Judge Ikuta has voted to grant the petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc.
The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35.
The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED.