Case Name: Elbert HICKS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; U.S. Postal Service, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-11-23
Citations: 623 F. App'x 74
Docket Number: No. 15-2072
Parties: Elbert HICKS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; U.S. Postal Service, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 623
Pages: 74–75

Head Matter:
Elbert HICKS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; U.S. Postal Service, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15-2072.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 19, 2015.
Decided: Nov. 23, 2015.
Elbert Hicks, Appellant Pro Se. Joel Eric Wilson, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Elbert Hicks appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hicks v. U.S. Dep't of Labor, No. 2:14-cv-00651-MSD-LRL (E.D.Va. filed July 23, 2015, entered July 24, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts arid legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and ar gument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.