Case Name: Michael A. LOISEAU, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Houston NORRIS, Lieutenant, Shift Watcher, Rappahannock Regional Jail, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-02-14
Citations: 465 F. App'x 273
Docket Number: No. 11-7293
Parties: Michael A. LOISEAU, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Houston NORRIS, Lieutenant, Shift Watcher, Rappahannock Regional Jail, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 465
Pages: 273–274

Head Matter:
Michael A. LOISEAU, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Houston NORRIS, Lieutenant, Shift Watcher, Rappahannock Regional Jail, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 11-7293.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 9, 2012.
Decided: Feb. 14, 2012.
Michael Angelo Loiseau, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael A. Loiseau appeals the district court's order adopting the reasoning set forth in the magistrate judge's report and recommendation and dismissing Loiseau's civil rights action for failure to state a claim. On appeal, we confíne our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Loiseau's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, Loiseau has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.