Case Name: Emmett PENDERGRAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1990-09-04
Citations: 797 S.W.2d 793
Docket Number: No. WD 42905
Parties: Emmett PENDERGRAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before LOWENSTEIN, P.J., and KENNEDY and ULRICH, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 797
Pages: 793–793

Head Matter:
Emmett PENDERGRAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 42905.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Sept. 4, 1990.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 2, 1990.
Application to Transfer Denied Nov. 20, 1990.
David S. Durbin, Appellate Defender, Terri L. Backhus, Asst. Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.
William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Stewart M. Freilich, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before LOWENSTEIN, P.J., and KENNEDY and ULRICH, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
From denial of a Rule 27.26 (repealed) motion, the movant raises two points: 1) his motion for new trial should have been sustained because of newly discovered evidence, and 2) counsel failed to advise him of the right to a change of judge.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).