Case Name: KLEINBERG et al. v. DEUTSCH
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1909-03-05
Citations: 115 N.Y.S. 91
Docket Number: 
Parties: KLEINBERG et al. v. DEUTSCH.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 115
Pages: 91–92

Head Matter:
KLEINBERG et al. v. DEUTSCH.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
March 5, 1909.)
Judgment (§ 251 )—Evidence to Support.
Where, in an action tor goods sold and delivered, the answer admits plaintiff’s claims to a certain amount, plaintiff being entitled to judgment for at least the amount admitted, a judgment for defendant is erroneous. [Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Judgment, Dec. Dig. § 251.*]
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Second District.
Action by Nathan Kleinberg and another against Emil Deutsch for goods sold and delivered. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiffs appeal. Reversed, and new trial ordered.
Argued before GILDERSLEEVE, P. J., and MacLEAN and DAYTON, JJ.
Leon Dashew, for appellants.
Charles W. Groll, for respondent.
For other cases see same topic & § numbeb in Dec, & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep’r Indexes

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The action is for goods sold and delivered. Judgment was given for defendant, with $15 costs. Plaintiffs appeal. Inasmuch as' the answer admits the claim to the extent of $47.78, plaintiffs were entitled to at least that sum.
Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide the event.