Case Name: Foot and Litchfield against Colvin and others
Court: New York Supreme Court of Judicature
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1807-11
Citations: 2 Johns. 481
Docket Number: 
Parties: Foot and Litchfield against Colvin and others.
Judges: 
Reporter: Johnson's Reports
Volume: 2
Pages: 480–481

Head Matter:
Foot and Litchfield against Colvin and others.
.Amendment of a case, male on affiomission of a fact, through mistak" of the counsel.
HOFFMAN, in behalf of the defendants, moved to amend the case which had been made, by inserting, “that counsel for the defendants objected, that the plain-_ , tiffs ought not to recover, because they had not shown a joint property in themselves, in the goods in question, which objection was overruled by thejudge, at the trial;" and he read an affidavit to that effect, and that the omis sion arose from the misapprehension of the counsel, at the trial, that he might avail himself of the objection, on the argument, though it was not stated in the case.
Kirtland, contra.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Take your rule to amend in 20 days, with liberty to the plaintiffs, to make amendments also, on their part.
Rule granted.