Case Name: Douglas TUNSIL, III, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2006-05-17
Citations: 929 So. 2d 665
Docket Number: No. 3D06-884
Parties: Douglas TUNSIL, III, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before WELLS, CORTINAS, and ROTHENBERG JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 929
Pages: 665–665

Head Matter:
Douglas TUNSIL, III, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D06-884.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 17, 2006.
Rehearing Denied June 7, 2006.
Douglas Tunsil, III, in proper person.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, for appellee.
Before WELLS, CORTINAS, and ROTHENBERG JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Reese v. State, 899 So.2d 428 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (confirming that infirmity in notice of intent to seek enhanced sentence must be raised in a timely Rule 3.850 motion); Tunsil v. State, 797 So.2d 651, 653 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)(re-manding for resentencing as expressly ordered and stating "[defendant need not be present" for same).