Case Name: Genevieve Goldschmidt, Respondent, v. New York State Housing Company, Sued, etc., and Another, Defendants. Francis Van Dam, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1928-10
Citations: 224 A.D. 843
Docket Number: 
Parties: Genevieve Goldschmidt, Respondent, v. New York State Housing Company, Sued, etc., and Another, Defendants. Francis Van Dam, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 224
Pages: 843–843

Head Matter:
Genevieve Goldschmidt, Respondent, v. New York State Housing Company, Sued, etc., and Another, Defendants. Francis Van Dam, Appellant.

Opinion:
Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. In order that the findings of fact and conclusions of law may be consistent, defendant Van Dam's proposed seventh conclusion of law, found by the court, is refused as not being sustained by the credible evidence and as not being material. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Seeger and Carswell, JJ. Settle order on notice.