Case Name: In the Matter of the Application of Rudolph Inderbitzen, Respondent, for a Mandamus Order against City of Buffalo and Others, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1935-10
Citations: 246 A.D. 568
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Application of Rudolph Inderbitzen, Respondent, for a Mandamus Order against City of Buffalo and Others, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 246
Pages: 568–568

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Application of Rudolph Inderbitzen, Respondent, for a Mandamus Order against City of Buffalo and Others, Appellants.

Opinion:
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (See Matter of Schmidt v. Board of Supervisors, 244 App. Div. 493, and Holton v. Board of Supervisors, 245 id. 144.) All concur. (The alternative mandamus order directs petitioner's reinstatement.) Present — Taylor, Edgcomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.