Case Name: Eric Alan SANDERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC, Defendant-Appellee, and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, of Charlotte, NC; John Hayward; Mike Calzareeta; Doug Ford; Rayvon Irby, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-03-15
Citations: 714 F. App'x 298
Docket Number: No. 17-2242
Parties: Eric Alan SANDERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOWE’S HOME CENTERS, LLC, Defendant-Appellee, and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, of Charlotte, NC; John Hayward; Mike Calzareeta; Doug Ford; Rayvon Irby, Defendants.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 714
Pages: 298–299

Head Matter:
Eric Alan SANDERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOWE’S HOME CENTERS, LLC, Defendant-Appellee, and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, of Charlotte, NC; John Hayward; Mike Calzareeta; Doug Ford; Rayvon Irby, Defendants.
No. 17-2242
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 13, 2018
Decided: March 15, 2018
Eric Alan Sanders, Appellant Pro Se. Richard James Morgan, MCNAIR LAW FIRM, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Eric Alan Sanders seeks to appeal the magistrate judge's order granting him an extension of time to file an opposition to the defendant's motion for summary judgment. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and eollat- eral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Sanders seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny Sanders' pending motions and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED