Case Name: DORLAND v. FIDELITY DEVELOPMENT CO. et al. (ROBIN, Intervener)
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1914-02-13
Citations: 146 N.Y.S. 297
Docket Number: 
Parties: DORLAND v. FIDELITY DEVELOPMENT CO. et al. (ROBIN, Intervener).
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 146
Pages: 297–297

Head Matter:
DORLAND v. FIDELITY DEVELOPMENT CO. et al. (ROBIN, Intervener).
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
February 13, 1914.)
Appeal and Error (§ 91*)—Right to Appeal.
An order granting a motion for leave to intervene as a defendant will be affirmed on appeal, if the order does not affect a substantial right of the defendants appealing therefrom.
[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Appeal and Error, Cent. Dig. §§ 612-641; Dec. Dig. § 91.*]
Appeal from Special Term, New York County.
Action by Louise M. Borland, a creditor, on behalf of herself, against the Fidelity Development Company, impleaded with others. From an order granting a motion of Joseph G. Robin for leave to intervene, the Development Company and others appeal.
Affirmed.
Argued before INGRAHAM, P. J., and McLAUGHLIN, LAUGH-LIN, CLARKE, and SCOTT, JJ..
Robert McC. Marsh, of New York City, for appellants.
Robert D. Ireland, of New York City, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The order appealed from is affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, upon the ground that the order granted does not affect a substantial right of the appellants.