Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arthur OUTLAW, a/k/a Ace, a/k/a Aceyon Rogers, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-02-22
Citations: 467 F. App'x 161
Docket Number: No. 11-7435
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arthur OUTLAW, a/k/a Ace, a/k/a Aceyon Rogers, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 467
Pages: 161–161

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arthur OUTLAW, a/k/a Ace, a/k/a Aceyon Rogers, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-7435.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 16, 2012.
Decided: Feb. 22, 2012.
Arthur Alan Outlaw, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Arthur Alan Outlaw appeals the district court's order reducing his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). Outlaw claims that the district court erred in its reduction calculation and in denying him a hearing. We find no such error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. United States v. Outlaw, No. 4:00-cr-70114-JLK-l (W.D.Va. Sept. 20, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.