Case Name: ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner, v. Michael Craig WORSHAM, Respondent
Court: Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jurisdiction: Maryland
Decision Date: 2006-03-08
Citations: 391 Md. 461
Docket Number: Misc. Docket AG No. 2
Parties: ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner, v. Michael Craig WORSHAM, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Maryland Reports
Volume: 391
Pages: 461–461

Head Matter:
893 A.2d 1119
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner, v. Michael Craig WORSHAM, Respondent.
Misc. Docket AG No. 2,
Sept. Term, 2005.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
March 8, 2006.
John C. Borderick, Asst. Bar Counsel (Melvin Hirshman, Bar Counsel, Atty. Grievance Com’n), for petitioner.
Charles E. Iliff, Jr., Pasadena, for respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
The Court having considered the Petition for Disciplinary Action, the proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law submitted by the hearing judge, the exceptions and recommendations of the parties filed hereto and the oral argument of counsel in the above-captioned case, it is this 8th day of March, 2006.
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the exceptions and recommendation of Bar Counsel be, and they are hereby, overruled, and the petition for disciplinary action is dismissed. Costs to be paid by the Attorney Grievance Commission.