Case Name: Ronald D. VAUGHN, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent-Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1997-07-15
Citations: 948 S.W.2d 280
Docket Number: No. 70909
Parties: Ronald D. VAUGHN, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent-Respondent.
Judges: Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 948
Pages: 280–280

Head Matter:
Ronald D. VAUGHN, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent-Respondent.
No. 70909.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
July 15, 1997.
Gwenda R. Robinson, St. Louis, for mov-ant-appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris III, David R. Truman, Asst. Attys. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent-respondent.
Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Ronald D. Vaughn (Movant) appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.085 motion for ineffective assistance of counsel. Movant alleges that the motion court erred because it failed to issue specific findings of fact and conclusions of law, and that trial counsel was ineffective in failing to investigate Movant's co-defendant, who later recanted his allegations implicating Movant in the charged offenses. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 86.14(b).