Case Name: Rickie Joseph ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Pharmacist Julie FINCH; Lt. Mack; Sgt. K. Hallman; Dr. Connie Vice; Dr. Herbert Myles; Dr. Michael Weinstein; Daniel Johnson; Judge J.B. Allen; H.G. Alexander, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-09-22
Citations: 294 F. App'x 12
Docket Number: No. 08-6692
Parties: Rickie Joseph ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Pharmacist Julie FINCH; Lt. Mack; Sgt. K. Hallman; Dr. Connie Vice; Dr. Herbert Myles; Dr. Michael Wein-stein; Daniel Johnson; Judge J.B. Allen; H.G. Alexander, Defendants-Ap-pellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 294
Pages: 12–13

Head Matter:
Rickie Joseph ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Pharmacist Julie FINCH; Lt. Mack; Sgt. K. Hallman; Dr. Connie Vice; Dr. Herbert Myles; Dr. Michael Wein-stein; Daniel Johnson; Judge J.B. Allen; H.G. Alexander, Defendants-Ap-pellees.
No. 08-6692.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 16, 2008.
Decided: Sept. 22, 2008.
Rickie Joseph Anderson, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Rickie Joseph Anderson appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Anderson v. Finch, No. 5:08-ct-03002-FL (E.D.N.C. Mar. 26, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.