Case Name: F. A. Schnabel v. James McNeill & Others
Court: Supreme Court of Texas
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1908-12-16
Citations: 102 Tex. 196
Docket Number: No. 1897
Parties: F. A. Schnabel v. James McNeill & Others.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Reports
Volume: 102
Pages: 196–196

Head Matter:
F. A. Schnabel v. James McNeill & Others.
No. 1897.
Decided December 16, 1908.
Administrator—Interest in Land—Deed—Estoppel—Limitation.
The rulings in Millican v. McNeill, ante p. 189, followed and held to control the disposition of this case. (P. 196.)
Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Second District, in an appeal from Erath County.
McNeill and others sued Schnabel and recovered. Defendant appealed, and on affirmance obtained writ of error.
W. W. Moores and Marshall Firguson, for plaintiff in error.
Oxford, Carlton & Jackson, for defendants in error.

Opinion:
Mr. Justice Williams
delivered the opinion of the court.
This action was brought by • the defendants in error to recover of plaintiff in error an undivided one-sixth interest in an acre of land in the town of Stephensville. The questions raised are the same as those this day decided in 'the case of Ira Millican et al. v. James McNeill et al" and we need only refer to the opinion in that case for most of the reasons upon which our judgment is based.
The record in this case differs from that, however, in that there is no statement of facts, but only the findings of the trial judge, which do not show the disposition made of the purchase money of the land sold by the 'administrator, and the question last decided in the opinion referred to, • as to the duty of plaintiffs to refund it, is not raised by the application for writ of error. The judgment must therefore be affirmed.
Affirmed.