Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerry McCOY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-11-14
Citations: 299 F. App'x 578
Docket Number: No. 08-1674
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerry McCOY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge and JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 299
Pages: 578–579

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerry McCOY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-1674.
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 13, 2008.
Decided Nov. 14, 2008.
Jeffrey M. Anderson, Office of the United States Attorney, Madison, WI, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Richard H. Parsons, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Peoria, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge and JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge.
This successive appeal has been submitted to the original panel under Operating Procedure 6(b). After examining the briefs and the record, we have concluded that oral argument is unnecessary. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); Cir. R. 34(f).

Opinion:
Order
The Anders brief filed by appellant's counsel concludes that the district court's decision — an order reducing appellant's sentence under Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b), though not by as much as appellant wanted — is not subject to appellate review. See United States v. McGee, 508 F.3d 442 (7th Cir.2007). Given an opportunity to respond, appellant has not done so. We agree with counsel that pursuing this appeal would be frivolous. Counsel's motion to withdraw is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.