Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Aquileo AYALA-FLORES, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-05-03
Citations: 225 F. App'x 333
Docket Number: No. 05-40741
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Aquileo AYALA-FLORES, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 225
Pages: 333–334

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Aquileo AYALA-FLORES, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-40741
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
May 3, 2007.
James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Philip G. Gallagher, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
PER CURIAM:
On January 8, 2006, the Supreme Court vacated our judgment in this case and remanded the case to this court for further consideration in light of Lopez v. Gonzales. The defendant has served his term of imprisonment and has been deported, but he remains subject to a term of supervised release. Our disposition of this appeal is governed by this circuit's binding precedent in United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis.
Because the defendant remains subject to a term of supervised release, however, he may still seek modification of the term of supervised release under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e), which does not require his presence. We therefore DISMISS this appeal without prejudice to the defendant's right to seek a modification of his term of supervised release.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
. - U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 625, 166 L.Ed.2d 462 (2006).
. 483 F.3d 381 (5th Cir.2007).