Case Name: Robert GRANT and Kim Grant, Appellants, v. Charles WHITCHURCH, Sr. and Dale Whitchurch, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-06-10
Citations: 600 So. 2d 512
Docket Number: No. 91-2463
Parties: Robert GRANT and Kim Grant, Appellants, v. Charles WHITCHURCH, Sr. and Dale Whitchurch, Appellees.
Judges: GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 600
Pages: 512–513

Head Matter:
Robert GRANT and Kim Grant, Appellants, v. Charles WHITCHURCH, Sr. and Dale Whitchurch, Appellees.
No. 91-2463.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
June 10, 1992.
Rehearing Denied July 30, 1992.
Jack Edward Orsley of Orsley & Cripps, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellants.
Daniel M. Bachi and Thomas J. Stanford of Sellars, Supran, Cole, Marion & Espy, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We reverse a summary judgment for the defendants. The trial court erred by striking paragraph 5(c) of the amended complaint. Therefore, there remain issues of fact whether the defendants, in the conduct of their babysitting service, are liable for the negligent supervision of, or a failure to supervise, the plaintiffs' child.
GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., concur.
LETTS, J., dissents without opinion.