Case Name: UNITED BIO-TEK, INC., Appellant, v. PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE CO., a/s/o Merola Enterprises, Inc., and Merola Enterprises, Inc., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1997-10-01
Citations: 700 So. 2d 741
Docket Number: No. 97-1335
Parties: UNITED BIO-TEK, INC., Appellant, v. PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE CO., a/s/o Merola Enterprises, Inc., and Merola Enterprises, Inc., Appellees.
Judges: Before COPE, GERSTEN and SHEVIN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 700
Pages: 741–742

Head Matter:
UNITED BIO-TEK, INC., Appellant, v. PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE CO., a/s/o Merola Enterprises, Inc., and Merola Enterprises, Inc., Appellees.
No. 97-1335.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 1, 1997.
Rehearing Denied Nov. 12, 1997.
Blair & Cole and Susan J. Cole, Coral Gables, for appellant.
Hightower & Rudd and Shelly Ray Senecal, for appellees.
Before COPE, GERSTEN and SHEVIN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Zarcone v. Lesser, 190 So.2d 805 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966); Green Manor Constr. Co. v. Punta Gorda Ready Mixed Concrete, Inc., 159 So.2d 255 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963), quashed on other grounds, 166 So.2d 889 (Fla.1964).