Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. LARRY DANIEL PERKINS, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2005-09-21
Citations: 201 Or. App. 587
Docket Number: 03CR1814; A124017
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. LARRY DANIEL PERKINS, Appellant.
Judges: Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Brewer, Chief Judge, and Rosenblum, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 201
Pages: 587–588

Head Matter:
Submitted on record and briefs August 17,
sentences vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed September 21, 2005
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. LARRY DANIEL PERKINS, Appellant.
03CR1814; A124017
120 P3d 28
James N. Varner filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Erika L. Hadlock, Assistant Solicitor General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Brewer, Chief Judge, and Rosenblum, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant was convicted of one count of assaulting a public safety officer, ORS 163.208, and one count of resisting arrest, ORS 162.315. He received an upward departure sentence of 18 months on the conviction for assaulting a public safety officer, based on a finding of persistent involvement in similar offenses. On appeal, defendant argues that the imposition of the departure sentence violated the rule of law, announced in Blakely v. Washington, 542 US 296, 124 S Ct 2531, 159 L Ed 2d 403 (2004), that sentencing departure factors other than the fact of a prior conviction or facts admitted by the defendant must be found by the jury. Although defendant did not preserve his challenge, we have held that such error is apparent on the face of the record. State v. Perez, 196 Or App 364, 102 P3d 705 (2004), rev allowed, 338 Or 488 (2005). For the reason set forth in Perez, we exercise our discretion to correct the error.
Sentences vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.