Case Name: Leontine B. SUSINO, Appellant/Cross Appellee, v. ESTATE OF James V. SUSINO, deceased; Theresa Hilger, individually and as Co-Personal Representative, and Lucille Hino, individually and as Co-Personal Representative, Appellees/Cross Appellants
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-05-31
Citations: 544 So. 2d 1058
Docket Number: No. 88-0588
Parties: Leontine B. SUSINO, Appellant/Cross Appellee, v. ESTATE OF James V. SUSINO, deceased; Theresa Hilger, individually and as Co-Personal Representative, and Lucille Hino, individually and as Co-Personal Representative, Appellees/Cross Appellants.
Judges: GLICKSTEIN and GUNTHER, JJ., and ROBINSON, STEVEN D., Associate Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 544
Pages: 1058–1058

Head Matter:
Leontine B. SUSINO, Appellant/Cross Appellee, v. ESTATE OF James V. SUSINO, deceased; Theresa Hilger, individually and as Co-Personal Representative, and Lucille Hino, individually and as Co-Personal Representative, Appellees/Cross Appellants.
No. 88-0588.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
May 31, 1989.
Rehearing Denied July 14, 1989.
Peter J. Forman and Gerald L. Knight of Gustafson, Stephens, Ferris, Forman & Hall, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant/cross appellee.
Sheldon Golding of Sheldon Golding, P.A., and Karen M. Zann of Balocco & Zann, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees/cross appellants.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
A genuine issue of material fact remains as to whether the appellees, Hilger and Hino, can be individually liable on the specific performance count. We reverse that portion of the final judgment finding Hil-ger and Hino not individually liable on the specific performance count because that count was never litigated at trial. In entering the final judgment, the trial court modified that portion of the previously entered partial summary judgment which found Hilger and Hino individually liable on this count. In our view, at the conclusion of the hearing on the motion for summary judgment, a genuine issue of material fact remained as to whether Hilger'and Hino could be held individually liable on the specific performance count. Therefore, we also reverse that portion of the partial summary judgment finding Hilger and Hino individually liable on this count.
Since we reverse those portions of the partial summary judgment and the final judgment disposing of this issue, we remand for a trial to determine whether Hil-ger and Hino may be held individually liable on the specific performance count. In all other respects the final judgment is affirmed.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED.
GLICKSTEIN and GUNTHER, JJ., and ROBINSON, STEVEN D., Associate Judge, concur.