Case Name: STATE ex v. THISTLE DOWN CLUB
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1926-01-09
Citations: 4 Ohio Law Abs. 96
Docket Number: No. 19549
Parties: STATE ex v. THISTLE DOWN CLUB
Judges: 
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 4
Pages: 96–96

Head Matter:
STATE ex v. THISTLE DOWN CLUB
No. 19549.
Supreme Court
Dock. Jan. 9, 1926;
4 Abs. 40.
Attorneys — C. C. Crabbe, H. H. Griswold, Wilbur E. Benoy, all of Columbus.

Opinion:
The Attorney General alleges in the petition filed herein that the Thistle Down Jockey Club, Inc., is an Ohio- Corporation; that it has acquired grounds and built structures for conducting meets, contests and races; that the Club has employed devices and apparatus for recording wagers on the outcome of horse taces; in violation of the Constitution and statutes of Ohio; and that this practice will continue in the future unless prevented by the order and judgment of this court.
The prayer asks for a judgment of ouster and for the appointment of trustees to liquidate the affairs of the club.