Case Name: Raul F. VERGARA, Appellant, v. Stephen H. BUTTER, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-10-09
Citations: 568 So. 2d 976
Docket Number: No. 90-1029
Parties: Raul F. VERGARA, Appellant, v. Stephen H. BUTTER, Appellee.
Judges: Before NESBITT, FERGUSON and COPE, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 568
Pages: 976–976

Head Matter:
Raul F. VERGARA, Appellant, v. Stephen H. BUTTER, Appellee.
No. 90-1029.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 9, 1990.
Rehearing Denied Nov. 20, 1990.
Raul F. Vergara, in pro. per.
Stephen H. Butter, in pro. per.
Before NESBITT, FERGUSON and COPE, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Raul Vergara, plaintiff below, appeals a final order dismissing his second amended complaint with prejudice. After review of the briefs and record herein, we concur with the trial court that the second amended complaint did not state a cause of action, see Nickolauson v. Rhyne, 529 So.2d 365 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988), and that if any cause of action did exist, it would be barred by the statute of limitations. See § 95.11(4), Fla.Stat. (1989). The order under review is therefore affirmed.