Case Name: A. M. SIMPSON, Respondent, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1917-01-08
Citations: 174 Cal. 815
Docket Number: S. F. No. 6817
Parties: A. M. SIMPSON, Respondent, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Reports
Volume: 174
Pages: 815–815

Head Matter:
[S. F. No. 6817.
In Bank.
January 8, 1917.]
A. M. SIMPSON, Respondent, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Appellant.
San Francisco — Tunnel Under Street — Assessment District.— Judgment reversed on the authority of Sayne v. San Francisco, ante, p. 185
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. J. M. Seawell, Judge.
The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion in Sayne v. San Frcuncisco, ante, p. 185.
Percy V. Long, City Attorney, and George Lull, Assistant City Attorney, for Appellant.
J. A. Cooper, for Respondent.

Opinion:
THE COURT.
This appeal involves the same tunnel assessment that was under consideration in Hayne et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, ante, p. 185, this day decided. The parties have stipulated that the facts are the same, except as to the parties and the amount of the assessment, and that the decision in this case shall be the same as in No. 6802. The same judgment is therefore given.
The judgment is reversed.
Rehearing denied.