Case Name: Babatunde Biodun OTUBANJO, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-09-04
Citations: 292 F. App'x 239
Docket Number: No. 08-1099
Parties: Babatunde Biodun OTUBANJO, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 292
Pages: 239–240

Head Matter:
Babatunde Biodun OTUBANJO, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 08-1099.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 26, 2008.
Decided: Sept. 4, 2008.
Irena I. Karpinski, Law Offices of Irena I. Karpinski, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Gregory G. Katsas, Assistant Attorney General, Francis Fraser, Senior Litigation Counsel, Jason Xavier Hamilton, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.
. Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Babatunde Biodun Otubanjo, a native and citizen of Nigeria, seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals adopting and affirming the decision of the Immigration Judge denying his request for a continuance for adjudication of a petition for alien relative. We have carefully reviewed the record and conclude that the decision to deny a continuance was not an abuse of discretion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.29 (2008); Onyeme v. INS, 146 F.3d 227, 231 (4th Cir.1998). We accordingly deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.