Case Name: HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellee, v. INTRASTATE CONSTRUCTION CORP., a Florida corporation, Lisa Bisogno, a Florida resident, Peter Bisogno, a Florida resident, Defendants-Counter Claimants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-11-22
Citations: 447 F. App'x 128
Docket Number: No. 11-10842
Parties: HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellee, v. INTRASTATE CONSTRUCTION CORP., a Florida corporation, Lisa Bisogno, a Florida resident, Peter Bisogno, a Florida resident, Defendants-Counter Claimants-Appellants.
Judges: Before HULL, MARCUS and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 447
Pages: 128–128

Head Matter:
HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellee, v. INTRASTATE CONSTRUCTION CORP., a Florida corporation, Lisa Bisogno, a Florida resident, Peter Bisogno, a Florida resident, Defendants-Counter Claimants-Appellants.
No. 11-10842.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Nov. 22, 2011.
Timothy S. Taylor, Elaine Witherspoon, Vezina Lawrence & Piscitelli, P.A., Coral Gables, FL, for Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellee.
Michael English Stearns, Douglas James Roberts, Leiby Stearns & Roberts, P.A., Sunrise, FL, for Defendants-Counter Claimants-Appellants.
Before HULL, MARCUS and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appellants argue, on this interlocutory appeal, that the district court abused its discretion in granting Appellee's request for a preliminary injunction.
After a thorough review of the briefs, record, and having had the benefit of oral argument, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in granting the preliminary injunction. We do not decide the ultimate issue of whether Appellee will prevail.
AFFIRMED.