Case Name: Charles Fred Flannell et al. v. Patricia Kane et al.
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1990-04-18
Citations: 21 Conn. App. 819
Docket Number: 8426
Parties: Charles Fred Flannell et al. v. Patricia Kane et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Appellate Reports
Volume: 21
Pages: 819–819

Head Matter:
Charles Fred Flannell et al. v. Patricia Kane et al.
(8426)
Spallone, Noegott and Lavery, Js.
Argued April 17
decision released April 18, 1990
Patricia Kane, pro se, the appellant (named defendant).
Rudra Tamm, for the appellees (plaintiffs).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
After oral argument, both parties concede that the issues raised in the named defendant's appeal from the trial court's granting of the plaintiffs' motion to extend the sale date, now past, in the underlying foreclosure action are now moot.
The appeal is dismissed and the case is remanded to the trial court for a new sale date to be set.