Case Name: Charlotte SUMMERS, Petitioner/Respondent, v. James SUMMERS, Respondent/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1994-03-08
Citations: 871 S.W.2d 146
Docket Number: No. 62620
Parties: Charlotte SUMMERS, Petitioner/Respondent, v. James SUMMERS, Respondent/Appellant.
Judges: Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 871
Pages: 146–147

Head Matter:
Charlotte SUMMERS, Petitioner/Respondent, v. James SUMMERS, Respondent/Appellant.
No. 62620.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
March 8, 1994.
Michael T. Cady, St. Louis, for respondent/appellant.
John T. Allan, Clayton, for petitioner/respondent.
Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Husband appeals that portion of the dissolution decree relating to the distribution of marital property. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. A written opinion would have no precedential value. Rule 84.16(b).