Case Name: Philip DelCOSTELLO, Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS AND WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS OF AMERICA, Defendant, and Local 557, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, and Anchor Motor Freight, Inc., Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1983-08-31
Citations: 716 F.2d 247
Docket Number: No. 81-2086
Parties: Philip DelCOSTELLO, Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS AND WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS OF AMERICA, Defendant, and Local 557, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, and Anchor Motor Freight, Inc., Appellees.
Judges: Before WINTER, Chief Judge, HALL, Circuit Judge, and BRYAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 716
Pages: 247–248

Head Matter:
Philip DelCOSTELLO, Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS AND WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS OF AMERICA, Defendant, and Local 557, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, and Anchor Motor Freight, Inc., Appellees.
No. 81-2086.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Aug. 31, 1983.
William H. Zinman, Richard P. Neuworth, Baltimore, Md., for appellant.
Bernard S. Goldfarb, Cleveland, Ohio (Karen N. Moellenberg, Goldfarb & Reznick, Cleveland, Ohio, Gerard P. Martin, Melnicove, Kaufman & Weiner, P.A., Baltimore, Md., on brief), for appellee Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.
Carl S. Yaller, Baltimore, Md. (Bernard W. Rubenstein, Edelman & Rubenstein, P.A., Baltimore, Md., on brief), for appellee Freight Drivers and Helpers, Local 557.
Before WINTER, Chief Judge, HALL, Circuit Judge, and BRYAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Upon consideration of the opinion and order of the United States Supreme Court in DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, et al., - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 2281, 76 L.Ed.2d 476 (1983), this Court concludes that the judgment of the district court must be reversed and the case must be remanded to the United States District Court for the District of Maryland for further proceedings in accordance with the opinion and directions of the Supreme Court.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.