Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Humberto GOSTELOS-FUENTES, a.k.a. Roberto Flores-Millan, Defendant-Appellant; United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Humberto Gostelos-Fuentes, a.k.a. Beto, a.k.a. Roberto Flores-Millan, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-06-19
Citations: 617 F. App'x 711
Docket Number: Nos. 14-10332, 14-10333
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Humberto GOSTELOS-FUENTES, a.k.a. Roberto Flores-Millan, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Humberto Gostelos-Fuentes, a.k.a. Beto, a.k.a. Roberto Flores-Millan, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 617
Pages: 711–711

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Humberto GOSTELOS-FUENTES, a.k.a. Roberto Flores-Millan, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Humberto Gostelos-Fuentes, a.k.a. Beto, a.k.a. Roberto Flores-Millan, Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 14-10332, 14-10333.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 17, 2015.
Filed June 19, 2015.
James Eric Keller, Assistant U.S., Elizabeth Olson White, Esquire, Assistant U.S., USRE-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Reno, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Robert W. Story, Story Law Group, Reno, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Humberto Gostelos-Fuentes appeals from the district court's judgments and challenges his guilty-plea convictions and concurrent 135-month sentences for unlawful reentry by a deported, removed, or excluded alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(l)(B)(viii) and 846. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Gostelo-Fuentes's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Gos-telo-Fuentes the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Gostelo-Fuentes has waived his right to appeal his convictions and his 135-month sentences. Because the record discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the appeal waivers, we dismiss the appeals. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir.2009).
Counsel's motion to withdraw as counsel is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.