Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alphelious Antoine ROOKS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-10-22
Citations: 297 F. App'x 216
Docket Number: No. 08-7543
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Alphelious Antoine ROOKS, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 297
Pages: 216–216

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Alphelious Antoine ROOKS, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 08-7543.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 15, 2008.
Decided: Oct. 22, 2008.
Alphelious Antoine Rooks, Appellant Pro Se. David John Novak, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Alphelious Antoine Rooks appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)(2) (West 2000 & Supp. 2008) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Rooks, No. 3:99-cr-00312-RLW-2 (E.D.Va. July 17, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.