Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Willie James DOUGLAS, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-12-01
Citations: 623 F. App'x 535
Docket Number: No. 15-12294
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Willie James DOUGLAS, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILSON, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 623
Pages: 535–535

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Willie James DOUGLAS, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-12294
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Dec. 1, 2015.
Michelle Thresher Taylor, Arthur Lee Bentley, III, U.S. Attorney’s office, Tampa, FL, Shawn P. Napier, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Orlando, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Willie J. Douglas, Jr., FCI Jesup-In-mate Legal Mail, Jesup, GA, pro se.
Rosemary Cakmis, Donna Lee Elm, Conrad Benjamin Kahn, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Orlando, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before WILSON, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Conrad Kahn, appointed counsel for Willie James Douglas, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent review of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's denial of Douglas's 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion is AFFIRMED.