Case Name: DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, As Trustee for Carrington Mortgage Loan Trust, Series 2005-Opt2, Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-Opt 2, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ivy K. INOCENCIO; Marissa P. Gomez; Equity Trustees, LLC; United States of America, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-01-07
Citations: 627 F. App'x 282
Docket Number: No. 15-1391
Parties: DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, As Trustee for Carrington Mortgage Loan Trust, Series 2005-Opt2, Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-Opt 2, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ivy K. INOCENCIO; Marissa P. Gomez; Equity Trustees, LLC; United States of America, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before GREGORY and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 627
Pages: 282–282

Head Matter:
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, As Trustee for Carrington Mortgage Loan Trust, Series 2005-Opt2, Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-Opt 2, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ivy K. INOCENCIO; Marissa P. Gomez; Equity Trustees, LLC; United States of America, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15-1391.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 29, 2015.
Decided: Jan. 7, 2016.
S. Mohsin Reza, Mary C. Zinsner, Troutman Sanders LLP, Tysons Corner, Virginia, for Appellant.
Carolina D. Ciraolo, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Thomas J. Clark, Regina S. Mariarty, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Before GREGORY and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. brought suit in Virginia state court seeking rescission of a foreclosure sale that took place approximately four years earlier. The United States removed the action to district court and moved to dismiss pursuant to Fed,R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), (6). The district court granted the motion to dismiss as to the United States, based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Because there were no viable remaining claims as against the remaining defendants, the court also dismissed the action in its entirety. We have reviewed the parties' briefs, as well as the record on appeal, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.