Case Name: Edmond CALLOWAY, Petitioner v. David RUDENSTEIN, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2017-05-31
Citations: 169 A.3d 558
Docket Number: No. 49 EM 2017
Parties: Edmond CALLOWAY, Petitioner v. David RUDENSTEIN, Respondent
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 169
Pages: 558–558

Head Matter:
Edmond CALLOWAY, Petitioner v. David RUDENSTEIN, Respondent
No. 49 EM 2017
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
May 31, 2017

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 31st day of May, 2017, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Ali, 10 A.3d 282, 293 (Pa. 2010) (explaining that hybrid representation is not permissible). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record.