Case Name: SOUTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY et al. Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PEERLESS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee and Third-Party Plaintiff, BITUMINOUS CASUALTY CORPORATION and J. E. Stack III, Third-Party Defendants-Appellees
Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1964-12-01
Citations: 169 So. 2d 728
Docket Number: No. 10298
Parties: SOUTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY et al. Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PEERLESS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee and Third-Party Plaintiff, BITUMINOUS CASUALTY CORPORATION and J. E. Stack III, Third-Party Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before HARDY, AYRES and BOLIN,, JJ-
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 169
Pages: 728–729

Head Matter:
SOUTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY et al. Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PEERLESS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee and Third-Party Plaintiff, BITUMINOUS CASUALTY CORPORATION and J. E. Stack III, Third-Party Defendants-Appellees.
No. 10298.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.
Dec. 1, 1964.
Carl F. Walker, Monroe, for plaintiffs-appellants.
A. K. Goff, Jr., Ruston, for defendant-appellee and third-party plaintiff.
Theus, Grisham, Davis, Leigh & Brown,,. Monroe, for third-party defendants-appel-lees.
Before HARDY, AYRES and BOLIN,, JJ-

Opinion:
AYRES, Judge.
This is a companion case to that of J Frank Johnston v. Bituminous Casualty Corporation, La.App., 169 So.2d 726.
Plaintiff is the collision insurer of the ^automobile of J. E. Stack, Jr., involved in -rthe collision in the companion case. The defendant is the public liability insurer of the J. Frank Johnston truck. J. E. Stack III, the driver of his father's automobile, .and the insurer of that vehicle were made -third-party defendants. There was judgment in favor of defendant and plaintiff .appealed.
Defendant has, in this court, moved for .a dismissal of plaintiff's appeal. However, in view of the conclusions reached as to the disposition of this cause on its merits, we do not deem it expedient or necessary -to determine the merits of the matters presented in the motion to dismiss.
For the reasons assigned in the com-panion case, the judgment in the instant case is hereby affirmed at plaintiffs-appellants' cost.
Affirmed.