Case Name: In the Matter of the Marriage of REILLY, Appellant, and REILLY, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1987-09-02
Citations: 87 Or. App. 205
Docket Number: 86-132-NJ-l; CA A42672
Parties: In the Matter of the Marriage of REILLY, Appellant, and REILLY, Respondent.
Judges: Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Warren and Rossman, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 87
Pages: 205–206

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted July 17,
affirmed as modified September 2, 1987
In the Matter of the Marriage of REILLY, Appellant, and REILLY, Respondent.
(86-132-NJ-l; CA A42672)
741 P2d 933
Daniel L. Harris, Ashland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Davis, Ainsworth, Pinnock, Davis & Gilstrap, P.C., Ashland.
William G. Carter, Medford, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Grant, Ferguson, Carter, P.C., Medford.
Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Warren and Rossman, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Paragraph 2(A) of the decree dissolving the parties' marriage is modified to provide that wife is entitled to six consecutive weeks' visitation each summer until the child is six years of age, at which time visitation shall be eight consecutive weeks. Paragraph 2(F)(1) is modified to provide that the parties will each bear one-half of the cost of transportation for the summer, Christmas and spring visitation periods, over and above any remuneration or travel benefits husband receives through his government employment.
Affirmed as modified. Costs to wife.