Case Name: Darryl ALLMOND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Deputy COZZA; Deputy Winstead; John Doe; Jane Doe, Defendants-Appellees, and James Dunning; Alexandria Sheriff's Department; City of Alexandria; Deputy Mason; Sergeant Eller; Richard R. Ruscak, Defendants; Darryl Allmond, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Deputy Cozza; Deputy Winstead; John Doe; Jane Doe, Defendants-Appellees, and James Dunning; Alexandria Sheriff's Department; City of Alexandria; Deputy Mason; Sergeant Eller; Richard R. Ruscak, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-05-20
Citations: 63 F. App'x 162
Docket Number: Nos. 03-1047, 03-1107
Parties: Darryl ALLMOND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Deputy COZZA; Deputy Winstead; John Doe; Jane Doe, Defendants-Appellees, and James Dunning; Alexandria Sheriff’s Department; City of Alexandria; Deputy Mason; Sergeant Eller; Richard R. Ruscak, Defendants. Darryl Allmond, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Deputy Cozza; Deputy Winstead; John Doe; Jane Doe, Defendants-Appellees, and James Dunning; Alexandria Sheriff's Department; City of Alexandria; Deputy Mason; Sergeant Eller; Richard R. Ruscak, Defendants.
Judges: Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 63
Pages: 162–162

Head Matter:
Darryl ALLMOND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Deputy COZZA; Deputy Winstead; John Doe; Jane Doe, Defendants-Appellees, and James Dunning; Alexandria Sheriff’s Department; City of Alexandria; Deputy Mason; Sergeant Eller; Richard R. Ruscak, Defendants. Darryl Allmond, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Deputy Cozza; Deputy Winstead; John Doe; Jane Doe, Defendants-Appellees, and James Dunning; Alexandria Sheriff's Department; City of Alexandria; Deputy Mason; Sergeant Eller; Richard R. Ruscak, Defendants.
Nos. 03-1047, 03-1107.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 15, 2003.
Decided May 20, 2003.
Darryl Allmond, Appellant Pro Se. Christina Kearney Saba, Shuford, Rubin & Gibney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
PER CURIAM.
Darryl Allmond appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying his motion for discovery sanctions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Allmond v. Cozza, No. CA-02-1106-A (E.D. Va. Dec. 23, 2002; filed Jan. 2, 2003 & entered Jan. 6, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.