Case Name: James L. SHORES, Jr., Executor of the Estate of Clarence E. Bishop, Jr., on behalf of himself and all other persons who purchased First Mortgage 8% Revenue Bonds issued by the Industrial Board of the Town of Frisco City, Alabama, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jerald H. SKLAR, et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1988-08-26
Citations: 855 F.2d 722
Docket Number: No. 86-7898
Parties: James L. SHORES, Jr., Executor of the Estate of Clarence E. Bishop, Jr., on behalf of himself and all other persons who purchased First Mortgage 8% Revenue Bonds issued by the Industrial Board of the Town of Frisco City, Alabama, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jerald H. SKLAR, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before RONEY, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK, EDMONDSON, and COX, Circuit Judges .
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 855
Pages: 722–723

Head Matter:
James L. SHORES, Jr., Executor of the Estate of Clarence E. Bishop, Jr., on behalf of himself and all other persons who purchased First Mortgage 8% Revenue Bonds issued by the Industrial Board of the Town of Frisco City, Alabama, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jerald H. SKLAR, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 86-7898.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Aug. 26, 1988.
W. Eugene Rutledge, Rutledge & Kelly, Birmingham, Ala., for plaintiff-appellant.
Crawford S. McGivaren, Jr., Cabaniss, Johnston, Gardner, Dumas & O’Neal, Larry B. Childs, Birmingham, Ala., for Jerald H. Sklar, et al.
Lee H. Zell, Berkowitz, Lefkovits, Isom & Kushner, Susan Salonimer, Birmingham, Ala., for Asa G. Candler.
Frank M. Young, III, Haskell, Slaughter & Young, James L. Richey, Birmingham, Ala., for Cecil J. Lamberson & Jackson Municipals, Inc.
Hobart A. McWhorter, Jr., Bradley, Arant, Rose & White, Richard H. Walston, Henry E. Simpson, Lange, Simpson, Robinson & Somerville, Birmingham, Ala., for Capell, Howard, Knabe & Cobbs.
Judge Vance is recused and did not participate in this decision.

Opinion:
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING IN BANC
Before RONEY, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK, EDMONDSON, and COX, Circuit Judges .
BY THE COURT:
A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing in banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing in banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court in banc with oral argument during the week of October 17, 1988, on a date hereafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of in banc briefs. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.