Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Angelo Fazio, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1964-04-30
Citations: 14 N.Y.2d 716
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Angelo Fazio, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 14
Pages: 716–717

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Angelo Fazio, Appellant.
Argued March 30, 1964;
decided April 30, 1964.
Thomas R. Beecher, Jr., for appellant.
Edward S. Silver, District Attorney (William I. Siegel of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
Order affirmed upon the ground that, unlike People v. Mangi (10 N Y 2d 86), it was not the District Attorney who prevented the accomplice witness from fully explaining his motive for offering testimony that implicated defendant in the crime for which he was convicted.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi and Bergan.