Case Name: Janice C. INGLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-09-24
Citations: 110 F. App'x 317
Docket Number: No. 03-2332
Parties: Janice C. INGLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 110
Pages: 317–317

Head Matter:
Janice C. INGLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 03-2332.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 30, 2004.
Decided: Sept. 24, 2004.
Hugh A. Blackwell, Mitchell, Blackwell & Mitchell, P.A., Valdese, North Carolina, for Appellant.
Robert J. Conrad, Jr., United States Attorney, Paul B. Taylor, Assistant United States Attorney, Robert J. Triba, Chief Regional Counsel, Christopher A. Michaels, Assistant Regional Counsel, Boston, Massachusetts, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Janice C. Ingle appeals the magistrate judge's decision upholding the decision of the Commissioner to deny Ingle's application for disability insurance benefits. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ingle v. Barnhart, No. CA-03-7 (W.D.N.C. filed Aug. 19, 2003; entered Aug. 20, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge.