Case Name: David GARRISON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-11-27
Citations: 590 So. 2d 23
Docket Number: No. 89-01430
Parties: David GARRISON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: RYDER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and PARKER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 590
Pages: 23–23

Head Matter:
David GARRISON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 89-01430.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Nov. 27, 1991.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Kevin Briggs, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Michael J. Neimand, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Defendant's convictions for battery on a law enforcement officer and obstructing an officer with violence are affirmed. There was no abuse of discretion in the trial court's denial of defendant's motion to continue the trial because a defense witness did not appear as expected. The witness had not been subpoenaed. See Williams v. State, 438 So.2d 936, 937 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).
RYDER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and PARKER, JJ., concur.