Case Name: AT&T Information Systems, Inc., Respondent, v. City of New York, Appellant, and Robert Abrams, as Attorney-General of the State of New York, Intervenor-Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1988-12-22
Citations: 73 N.Y.2d 842
Docket Number: 
Parties: AT&T Information Systems, Inc., Respondent, v City of New York, Appellant, and Robert Abrams, as Attorney-General of the State of New York, Intervenor-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 73
Pages: 842–844

Head Matter:
AT&T Information Systems, Inc., Respondent, v City of New York, Appellant, and Robert Abrams, as Attorney-General of the State of New York, Intervenor-Appellant.
Argued November 21, 1988;
decided December 22, 1988
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Peter L. Zimroth, Corporation Counsel (Judith R. Greenwald, Edith I. Spivack and Joseph I. Lauer of counsel), for defendant-appellant.
Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Harvey M. Berman and O. Peter Sherwood of counsel), intervenor-appellant pro se.
Ira G. Greenberg, Martin J. Eisen, James P. Kratochvill and Richard A. Sinton of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Ernst H. Rosenberger at the Appellate Division (137 AD2d 7).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.