Case Name: Don CRUDUP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sgt. ENGLEHART; Officer Schulte, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-01-14
Citations: 590 F. App'x 226
Docket Number: No. 14-7158
Parties: Don CRUDUP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sgt. ENGLEHART; Officer Schulte, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 590
Pages: 226–226

Head Matter:
Don CRUDUP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sgt. ENGLEHART; Officer Schulte, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 14-7158.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 20, 2014.
Decided: Jan. 14, 2015.
Don Crudup, Appellant pro se. Nichole Cherie Gatewood, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, for Appellees.
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Don Crudup appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Crudup v. Englehart, No. 1:13-cv-03479-JKB (D. Md. filed Oct. 16, 2014; entered Oct. 17, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately-presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.