Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Eugene Bryant, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1998-05-26
Citations: 250 A.D.2d 858
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eugene Bryant, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 250
Pages: 858–859

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eugene Bryant, Appellant.
[672 NYS2d 786]

Opinion:
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jones, J.), rendered November 6, 1996, convicting him of rob bery in the first degree (two counts), robbery in the second degree (two counts), and assault in the second degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his identity as the perpetrator is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). Rosenblatt, J. P., Copertino, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.