Case Name: Michael MOSLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2016-06-28
Citations: 492 S.W.3d 222
Docket Number: No. ED 103263
Parties: Michael MOSLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 492
Pages: 222–223

Head Matter:
Michael MOSLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 103263
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Filed: June 28, 2016
Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Michael Mosley appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).