Case Name: DUFFY, Appellant, v. MAYOR, ETC., OF CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1899-02-07
Citations: 55 N.Y.S. 1139
Docket Number: 
Parties: DUFFY, Appellant, v. MAYOR, ETC., OF CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 55
Pages: 1139–1139

Head Matter:
DUFFY, Appellant, v. MAYOR, ETC., OF CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
February 7, 1899.)
Action by Edward A. Duffy against the mayor, aldermen, and commonalty of the city of New York. Louis Steckler, for appellant. Theodore Connoly (Terence Farley, on the brief), for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We think the defect in the street was sufficient in character and extent to require submission to the jury of the question whether the city had properly discharged its duty in the maintenance of the highway. The judgment and order should be reversed, and a new trial granted; costs to abide the event.