Case Name: Yodelmis VAZQUEZ, Petitioner, v. WENDY'S and ACE-USA, Respondents
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2006-05-11
Citations: 931 So. 2d 152
Docket Number: No. 1D05-4847
Parties: Yodelmis VAZQUEZ, Petitioner, v. WENDY’S and ACE-USA, Respondents.
Judges: WOLF and DAVIS, JJ., concur; ERVIN, J., dissents with Opinion.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 931
Pages: 152–155

Head Matter:
Yodelmis VAZQUEZ, Petitioner, v. WENDY’S and ACE-USA, Respondents.
No. 1D05-4847.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
May 11, 2006.
Rehearing Denied June 19, 2006.
Robert L.H. Rampil, Coral Gables, and Jay M. Levy of Jay M. Levy, P.A., Miami, for Petitioner.
Robert L. Teitler and Renee Smith of Walton, Lantaff, Schroeder & Carson, Miami; and T. Peter Nguyen of Marcos, Rothman, Scharf & Valdes, P.A., Miami, for Respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari is denied. On certiorari review, the order of the lower tribunal will be quashed only if it "departs from the essential requirements of law." Haines City Cmty. Dev. v. Heggs, 658 So.2d 523, 527 (Fla.1995). Prior to considering whether the order departs from the essential requirements of law, however, the petitioner must establish that the order results in irreparable harm. City of Oldsmar v. Kimmins Contracting Corp., 805 So.2d 1091, 1093 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Taylor v. Columbia/HCA Doctors Hosp. of Sarasota, 746 So.2d 1244, 1245 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). In this case, the petitioner has failed to demonstrate that the functional capacity evaluation will result in irreparable harm. Accordingly, the petition for writ of certiorari is denied.
DENIED.
WOLF and DAVIS, JJ., concur; ERVIN, J., dissents with Opinion.