Case Name: In the Matter of Randolph Bell, Inc., et al., Petitioners, v. City of Kingston, Office of Community Development, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1983-06-06
Citations: 95 A.D.2d 897
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Randolph Bell, Inc., et al., Petitioners, v City of Kingston, Office of Community Development, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 95
Pages: 897–897

Head Matter:
(June 6, 1983)
In the Matter of Randolph Bell, Inc., et al., Petitioners, v City of Kingston, Office of Community Development, Respondent.

Opinion:
— Motion by respondent to dismiss proceeding granted, without costs, since the proper vehicle for review of the judgment dated March 11, 1983, is an appeal. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.