Case Name: People v. Edward Meyers, Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1993-02-05
Citations: 190 A.D.2d 1098
Docket Number: 
Parties: People v Edward Meyers, Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 190
Pages: 1098–1098

Head Matter:
People v Edward Meyers, Defendant.

Opinion:
— Motion for change of venue denied. Memorandum: We conclude that defendant has not on this application met his burden of demonstrating that there is "reasonable cause to believe that a fair and impartial trial cannot be had" in Onondaga County (CPL 230.20 [2]). If it develops during the voir dire that a fair and impartial jury cannot be drawn, an appropriate application may then be made. The relief requested in the application before us now is premature (see, People v DiPiazza, 24 NY2d 342; People v Jacobsen, 170 AD2d 1043). Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Lawton, Boomer and Davis, JJ.