Case Name: Tammy M. STONE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Larry STARCHER, Chief Supreme Court Justice, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-09-07
Citations: 105 F. App'x 523
Docket Number: No. 04-1574
Parties: Tammy M. STONE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Larry STARCHER, Chief Supreme Court Justice, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 105
Pages: 523–524

Head Matter:
Tammy M. STONE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Larry STARCHER, Chief Supreme Court Justice, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 04-1574.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 27, 2004.
Decided: Sept. 7, 2004.
Tammy M. Stone, Appellant pro se.
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Tammy M. Stone appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge denying Stone's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing her complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Stone v. Starcher, No. CA-04-44-2 (S.D.W. Va. Apr. 1 & May 3, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED