Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Karl A. SCHLEDWITZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1996-03-27
Citations: 86 F.3d 73
Docket Number: Nos. 95-5309, 95-5409
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Karl A. SCHLEDWITZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 86
Pages: 73–76

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Karl A. SCHLEDWITZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 95-5309, 95-5409.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Argued Nov. 16, 1995.
Decided March 27, 1996.
Gary Humble, Assistant U.S. Attorney (argued and briefed), Office of the U.S. Attorney, Chattanooga, TN, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Ann C. Short (argued and briefed), Herbert S. Moncier (briefed), Knoxville, TN, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: CONTIE, MILBURN and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
The court having received a petition for rehearing en banc, and the petition having been circulated not only to the original panel members but also to all other active judges of this court, and less than a majority of the judges having favored the suggestion, the petition for rehearing has been referred to the original hearing panel.
The panel has further reviewed the petition for rehearing and concludes that the issues raised in the petition were fully considered upon the original submission and decision of the case. Accordingly, the petition is denied.
MERRITT, C.J., filed a separate dissent in which MARTIN, J., joined.