Case Name: Martin HARRIS, Appellant, v. SUNNY HILL, INC. and Division of Employment Security, Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-12-11
Citations: 387 S.W.3d 409
Docket Number: No. ED 98226
Parties: Martin HARRIS, Appellant, v. SUNNY HILL, INC. and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J. and ROY L. RICHTER and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 387
Pages: 409–409

Head Matter:
Martin HARRIS, Appellant, v. SUNNY HILL, INC. and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.
No. ED 98226.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Dec. 11, 2012.
Steven A. Trefts, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Marcus C. Wilbers, St. Louis, MO, Robert A. Bedell, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J. and ROY L. RICHTER and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Martin Harris ("Claimant") appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission ("the Commission"). denying his petition for unemployment benefits. Claimant argues the Commission erred in finding he committed misconduct: (1) by violating the policies of his employer, Sunny Hill, Inc. ("Employer"), despite the fact that Employer did not offer evidence of the policies Claimant allegedly violated; and (2) based on prior events that were not the reason or cause of his termination.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).