Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jason Allen SANDS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-12-13
Citations: 461 F. App'x 584
Docket Number: No. 11-30050
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jason Allen SANDS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: GUY, McKEOWN, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 461
Pages: 584–585

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jason Allen SANDS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-30050.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 8, 2011.
Filed Dec. 13, 2011.
Cyndee Peterson, USMI-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Missoula, MT, Leif Johnson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, USBI-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Billings, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Andrew J. Nelson, Esquire, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Defenders of Montana, Missoula, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: GUY, McKEOWN, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
The Honorable Ralph B. Guy, Jr., Senior Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Defendant appeals from his conviction for attempting to persuade or entice a person he believed was a minor to engage in criminal sexual activity in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b). Although defendant frames the issue on appeal as whether the denial of his motion for judgment of ac quittal violated the Due Process Clause, the issue is more clearly defined as his contention that the government failed to prove the elements of the crime charged.
Contrary to defendant's assertions, sexual intercourse with a child is not required to establish guilt under § 2422(b), nor is the prosecution required to prove that an underage child was actually involved in the offense. United States v. Meek, 366 F.3d 705, 718-19 (9th Cir.2004). It is irrelevant that Montana has a specific offense of attempting sexual intercourse without consent. Under § 2422(b) the crime of attempt involves an attempt to secure the consent of the minor to engage in the criminal act. United States v. Hofus, 598 F.3d 1171, 1179 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 364, 178 L.Ed.2d 235 (2010).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.