Case Name: Emma Kramer, Respondent, v. Berkshire Life Insurance Company, Appellant, et al., Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1996-06-04
Citations: 228 A.D.2d 169
Docket Number: 
Parties: Emma Kramer, Respondent, v Berkshire Life Insurance Company, Appellant, et al., Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 228
Pages: 169–169

Head Matter:
Emma Kramer, Respondent, v Berkshire Life Insurance Company, Appellant, et al., Defendant.
[643 NYS2d 338]

Opinion:
Defendant's evidence of the materiality of the misrepresentations in the application for the subject life insurance policy being less than "clear and substantially uncontradicted", its motion for summary judgment was properly denied (Continental Ins. Co. v RLI Ins. Co., 161 AD2d 385, 387). Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.