Case Name: Saul Castro et al., Respondents, v. Antonio Cepero, Jr., et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2002-11-19
Citations: 299 A.D.2d 237
Docket Number: 
Parties: Saul Castro et al., Respondents, v Antonio Cepero, Jr., et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 299
Pages: 237–238

Head Matter:
Saul Castro et al., Respondents, v Antonio Cepero, Jr., et al., Appellants.
[749 NYS2d 419]

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.), entered May 1, 2002, which denied defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Summary judgment was properly denied since it may be reasonably inferred from the evidence that plaintiff, while bicycling, skidded and fell, by reason of dirt tracked onto the street from defendants' steeply pitched intersecting dirt driveway (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853; Rose v Da Ecib USA, 259 AD2d 258, 259; Sheppard Intl, v Vogel, 147 AD2d 351, 352). Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Rubin and Friedman, JJ.