Case Name: POWELL, Appellant, v. EDWARD HINES LUMBER COMPANY, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1978-01-16
Citations: 32 Or. App. 145
Docket Number: No. A 7705-06737, WCB 76-876, CA 8939
Parties: POWELL, Appellant, v. EDWARD HINES LUMBER COMPANY, Respondent.
Judges: Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Thornton and Joseph, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 32
Pages: 145–147

Head Matter:
Argued December 15, 1977,
affirmed January 16, 1978
POWELL, Appellant, v. EDWARD HINES LUMBER COMPANY, Respondent.
(No. [ A XXXX-XXXXX ], WCB 76-876, CA 8939)
572 P2d 1335
Neis Peterson, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Peterson, Peterson & Peterson, P.C., Portland.
Scott M. Kelley, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Gearin, Cheney, Landis, Aebi & Kelley, Portland.
Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Thornton and Joseph, Judges.
PER CURIAM.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this worker's compensation case the primary issue is a factual one — did claimant prove by a preponderance of the evidence that his original compensable back injury had been aggravated? We agree with the triers of fact below that he did not.
Affirmed.