Case Name: Charles VOTAW and Shirley Votaw, his wife, Appellants, v. Roger L. WATKINS, Outer Beaches Realty, Inc., and Transatlantic Builders, Inc., Appellees; OUTER BEACHES REALTY, INC., Appellant, v. Roger L. WATKINS, Charles Votaw and Shirley Votaw, his wife, and Transatlantic Builders, Inc., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-09-27
Citations: 660 So. 2d 1171
Docket Number: Nos. 95-1628, 95-1703
Parties: Charles VOTAW and Shirley Votaw, his wife, Appellants, v. Roger L. WATKINS, Outer Beaches Realty, Inc., and Transatlantic Builders, Inc., Appellees. OUTER BEACHES REALTY, INC., Appellant, v. Roger L. WATKINS, Charles Votaw and Shirley Votaw, his wife, and Transatlantic Builders, Inc., Appellees.
Judges: KLEIN, STEVENSON and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 660
Pages: 1171–1172

Head Matter:
Charles VOTAW and Shirley Votaw, his wife, Appellants, v. Roger L. WATKINS, Outer Beaches Realty, Inc., and Transatlantic Builders, Inc., Appellees. OUTER BEACHES REALTY, INC., Appellant, v. Roger L. WATKINS, Charles Votaw and Shirley Votaw, his wife, and Transatlantic Builders, Inc., Appellees.
Nos. 95-1628, 95-1703.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Sept. 27, 1995.
Hinda Klein of Conroy, Simberg & Lewis, P.A., Hollywood, for appellants — Charles Vo-taw and Shirley Votaw, his wife.
Roberto M. Ureta of Leland E. Stansell, Jr., P.A., Miami, for appellant — Outer Beaches Realty, Inc.
Kenneth D. Cooper of Kenneth D. Cooper, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee — Roger L. Watkins.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The Votaws are residents of North Carolina and own residential property there which is managed by Outer Beaches, a North Carolina corporation. Watkins, who was injured on the Votaw's property in North Carolina, brought this lawsuit against the Vo-taws and Outer Beaches in Florida. The Votaws and Outer Beaches moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, the trial court denied the motion, and they filed separate appeals which we consolidate.
Athough Watkins' complaint contained allegations to the effect that appellants were doing business in Florida, appellants filed affidavits which refuted these allegations, which then placed the burden on Watkins to prove the basis of long arm jurisdiction. Venetian Salami Co. v. Parthenais, 554 So.2d 499 (Fla.1989). Watkins did not sufficiently refute the proof contained in appellants' affidavits either by affidavit or at an evidentiary hearing. The trial court therefore erred in denying the motions to dismiss.
Reversed.
KLEIN, STEVENSON and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.