Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jorge SILVEYRA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-08-25
Citations: 199 F. App'x 620
Docket Number: No. 05-50551
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jorge SILVEYRA, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: GOODWIN, REINHARDT, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 199
Pages: 620–621

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jorge SILVEYRA, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 05-50551.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 21, 2006.
Filed Aug. 25, 2006.
Samantha P. Jessner, AUSA, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Kenneth M. Stern, Esq., Law Offices Kenneth M. Stern, Woodland Hills, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Jorge Silveyra, Los Angeles, CA, pro se.
Before: GOODWIN, REINHARDT, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Jorge Silveyra appeals from the 262-month sentence imposed after his guilty-plea conviction for one count of conspiring to possess with intent to distribute cocaine and cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846(a)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and affirm.
Silveyra's contention that the government breached the plea agreement by recommending a 3-level upward adjustment for his role in the offense pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1 has no merit. The plea agreement unambiguously states that the government reserved its right to argue for such an adjustment. See United States v. Ajugwo, 82 F.3d 925, 928 (9th Cir.1996).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.