Case Name: NEW ENGLAND HEALTH CARE EMPLOYEES PENSION FUND, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated; Clifford Mosher, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated; Tejinder Singh, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated; Sotpal Singh, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Robert S. WOODRUFF; Joseph P. Nacchio, Defendants-Appellants, and Qwest Communications International, Inc.; Drake S. Tempest; James A. Smith; Arthur Andersen L.L.P.; Craig D. Slater; Philip F. Anschutz, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-04-02
Citations: 520 F.3d 1255
Docket Number: No. 06-1482
Parties: NEW ENGLAND HEALTH CARE EMPLOYEES PENSION FUND, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated; Clifford Mosher, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated; Tejinder Singh, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated; Sotpal Singh, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Robert S. WOODRUFF; Joseph P. Nacchio, Defendants-Appellants, and Qwest Communications International, Inc.; Drake S. Tempest; James A. Smith; Arthur Andersen L.L.P.; Craig D. Slater; Philip F. Anschutz, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before KELLY, BALDOCK, and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 520
Pages: 1255–1259

Head Matter:
NEW ENGLAND HEALTH CARE EMPLOYEES PENSION FUND, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated; Clifford Mosher, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated; Tejinder Singh, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated; Sotpal Singh, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Robert S. WOODRUFF; Joseph P. Nacchio, Defendants-Appellants, and Qwest Communications International, Inc.; Drake S. Tempest; James A. Smith; Arthur Andersen L.L.P.; Craig D. Slater; Philip F. Anschutz, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 06-1482.
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
April 2, 2008.
Herbert J. Stern of Stern & Kilcullen, LLC, Roseland, New Jersey, and David Meister of Clifford Chance, US, LLP, New York, New York (James Miller and David Cook of Clifford Chance, US, LLP, New York, New York; and Jeffrey Speiser and Joel M. Silverstein of Stern & Kilcullen, LLC, Roseland, New Jersey, with them on the briefs), for Defendants-Appellants.
David R. Boyd of Boies, Schiller & Flex-ner LLP, Washington, D.C. (Jonathan D. Schiller, Alfred P. Levitt, and Jorge Schmidt P. of Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP, Washington, D.C.; Terence C. Gill of Sherman & Howard, LLC, Denver, Colorado, with him on the brief), for Defendant-Appellee Qwest Communications International Inc.
• Michael J. Dowd of Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP, San Diego, California (Keith F. Park, Spencer A. Burkholz, and Thomas E. Egler of Ler-ach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP, San Diego, California; Sanford Svetcov and Susan K. Alexander of Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP, San Francisco, California, with him on the brief), for Plaintiffs-Appellees.
Before KELLY, BALDOCK, and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge.
Appellee Qwest Communications International Inc.'s petition for panel rehearing is denied by the panel. Judge Briscoe would grant panel rehearing for the reasons stated in her dissent. Judge Baldock would grant panel rehearing to hold that once appellants demonstrate plain legal prejudice as to one provision of the settlement agreement, they have standing to object to all of the agreement's provisions. Judge Baldock continues to concur in the result of the panel opinion. Because neither Judge Briscoe's dissent, nor Judge Baldock's view of standing commands a panel majority, the petition for panel rehearing is denied.
The suggestion for en banc rehearing was transmitted to all judges of the court who are in regular active service. No poll on the suggestion was requested and the suggestion is therefore denied.
. Lead Plaintiffs-Appellees New England Health Care Employees Pension Fund, et al. have joined in the petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc.