Case Name: PRUNKLE v. DRZEWIECKI
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1930-03-17
Citations: 8 Ohio Law Abs. 304
Docket Number: No 2323
Parties: PRUNKLE v DRZEWIECKI
Judges: Williams and Lloyd, JJ., concur.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 8
Pages: 304–305

Head Matter:
PRUNKLE v DRZEWIECKI
Ohio Appeals, 6th Dist, Luacs Co
No 2323.
Decided March 17, 1930
Marion W. Bacóme, Toledo, for Prunkle.
Stanley A. Konczal, Toledo, for Drzewiecki.

Opinion:
RICHARDS, J.
Under the state of the evidence in this case it is apparent that summons was never served on John Prunkle in any manner and that he had no knowledge of the bringing or pendency of the action until long after the judgment was rendered, and has not had his day in court on the original action.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
Williams and Lloyd, JJ., concur.