Case Name: SOUTH FLORIDA PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATION and Associated Industries Insurance Company, Inc., Appellants, v. Stanley SALONY, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2001-01-05
Citations: 775 So. 2d 417
Docket Number: No. 1D00-265
Parties: SOUTH FLORIDA PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATION and Associated Industries Insurance Company, Inc., Appellants, v. Stanley SALONY, Appellee.
Judges: BOOTH, KAHN, and BROWNING, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 775
Pages: 417–418

Head Matter:
SOUTH FLORIDA PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATION and Associated Industries Insurance Company, Inc., Appellants, v. Stanley SALONY, Appellee.
No. 1D00-265.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jan. 5, 2001.
Mary Ann Stiles and Rayford H. Taylor of Stiles, Taylor & Grace, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellants.
Marc Golden and Randy D. Ellison of Rosenthal & Weissman, P.A., West Palm Beach, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We do not reach the merits of this case because appellants' arguments are not preserved for appeal. In order to preserve an argument for appeal, it must be presented to the judge of compensation claims "in substantially the same detail as the carrier would later wish to urge upon us." Showell Farms v. Carter, 633 So.2d 477, 480 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).
The order of the JCC is, therefore, AFFIRMED.
BOOTH, KAHN, and BROWNING, JJ., concur.