Case Name: Seeck & Kade, Inc., Appellant, v. R. Tomshinsky, Individually and Trading as Webster Cut Rate Drug Stores, et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1936-01-07
Citations: 269 N.Y. 613
Docket Number: 
Parties: Seeck & Kade, Inc., Appellant, v. R. Tomshinsky, Individually and Trading as Webster Cut Rate Drug Stores, et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 269
Pages: 613–614

Head Matter:
Seeck & Kade, Inc., Appellant, v. R. Tomshinsky, Individually and Trading as Webster Cut Rate Drug Stores, et al., Respondents.
(Argued December 2, 1935;
decided January 7, 1936.)
Mark Eisner and James F. Donnelly for appellant.
Jay Leo Rothschild and .Froncés Kneitel for respondents.
Jay Leo Rothschild for Heam Department Stores, Inc., amicus curios.
Charles Goldman and Harold Dublirer for Cooper & Cooper, Inc,, amicus curice.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Doubleday, Doran & Co. v. Macy & Co. (269 N. Y. 272). No opinion.
Concur; Crañe, Ch, J., Lehman, O'Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.