Case Name: SLINGER DRAINAGE, INC., Petitioner, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-04-13
Citations: 244 F.3d 968
Docket Number: No. 99-1433
Parties: SLINGER DRAINAGE, INC., Petitioner, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent.
Judges: Before: HARRY T. EDWARDS, Chief Judge; STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, GINSBURG, SENTELLE, KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON, RANDOLPH, ROGERS, TATEL and GARLAND, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 244
Pages: 968–969

Head Matter:
SLINGER DRAINAGE, INC., Petitioner, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent.
No. 99-1433.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Filed April 13, 2001.
Before: HARRY T. EDWARDS, Chief Judge; STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, GINSBURG, SENTELLE, KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON, RANDOLPH, ROGERS, TATEL and GARLAND, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
A statement of Circuit Judge WILLIAMS dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc is attached.
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Petitioner's petition for rehearing en banc and the response thereto have been circulated to the full court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular active service did not vote in favor of the petition. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is
ORDERED that the petition be denied.
A separate Memorandum Opinion supporting the denial of rehearing is attached to the order denying the petition for panel rehearing.