Case Name: JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, et al. Defendants
Court: United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-04-23
Citations: 195 F. Supp. 2d 198
Docket Number: No. CIV.A. 01-0981(PLF)
Parties: JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, et al. Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Supplement 2d
Volume: 195
Pages: 186-198–186-198

Head Matter:
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, et al. Defendants.
No. CIV.A. 01-0981(PLF).
United States District Court, District of Columbia.
April 23, 2002.
Paul J. Orfanedes, Klayman & Associates, PC, Larry Klayman, Judicial Watch, Inc., Washington, DC, for Plaintiff.
Daniel Edward Bensing, U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Programs Branch, Civil Division, Washington, DC, Anne L. Weisman, U.S. Department of Justice Civil Division, Washington, DC, William Alvarado Rivera, U.S. Department of Justice Civil Division, Washington, DC, for Defendants.

Opinion:
ORDER
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
The Court has before it plaintiffs expedited request for a status conference and defendants' opposition. Plaintiff has made this request based on its concerns over the documents withheld by defendants and the extent to which defendants have redacted certain documents. The Court, however, concludes that these concerns should be addressed in the context of the motions for summary judgment that will be filed according to the Court's prior order of March 5, 2002 and the stipulation on the briefing schedule approved by the Court on March 19, 2002. Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED that plaintiffs expedited request is DENIED.
SO ORDERED.