Case Name: KECK v. WOODRING
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1946-11-12
Citations: 197 Okla. 663
Docket Number: No. 32571
Parties: KECK v. WOODRING.
Judges: GIBSON, C.J., HURST, V.C.J., and OSBORN, CORN, and DAVISON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 197
Pages: 663–664

Head Matter:
KECK v. WOODRING.
No. 32571.
Nov. 12, 1946.
174 P. 2d 248.
Willis' & Manning, of Fairview, for plaintiff in error.
Arney & Barker, of Clinton, Smith & Siler, of Oklahoma City, and Bob Minton, of Sayre, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This action was commenced by Robert Woodring, a minor, by his father and next friend, against G. E. Keck to recover for personal injuries. On November 5, 1945, the cause was dismissed for want of prosecution. On December 21, 1945, plaintiff filed his motion to reinstate the cause, and thereupon the court entered its order on January 21, 1946, setting aside the order dismissing the cause and reinstating the cause. A motion to dismiss the appeal has been filed.
The motion to dismiss the appeal must be sustained. In Haywood v. Pinkey, 112 Okla. 30, 239 P. 456, we stated that an order sustaining a motion to set aside a dismissal of a cause of action and reinstating the same is not a final order and that no appeal can be taken therefrom prior to a final determination of the case. To the same effect see Madison v. Trekell, 179 Okla. 65, 64 P. 2d 711.
The appeal is dismissed.
GIBSON, C.J., HURST, V.C.J., and OSBORN, CORN, and DAVISON, JJ., concur.