Case Name: Manuel RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-05-09
Citations: 542 So. 2d 1064
Docket Number: No. 88-2062
Parties: Manuel RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before FERGUSON, JORGENSON and COPE, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 542
Pages: 1064–1064

Head Matter:
Manuel RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 88-2062.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 9, 1989.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and N. Joseph Durant, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Jacqueline M. Valdespino, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before FERGUSON, JORGENSON and COPE, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In identifying a defendant as an habitual offender for the purpose of an enhanced sentence, the court must make specific findings of fact, in writing, as to why it is necessary for the protection of the public to impose an extended term of imprisonment. § 775.084, Fla.Stat. (1987); Scott v. State, 423 So.2d 986 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).
The sentence is reversed and the cause is remanded for further consistent proceedings.