Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Odilia Graciela CHACON, also known as Grace Chacon, also known as Graciela Chacon, also known as Gracie Chacon, also known as Odilia Chacon, also known as Odilia G. Chacon, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-10-24
Citations: 699 F. App'x 352
Docket Number: No. 17-50089 Conference Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Odilia Graciela CHACON, also known as Grace Chacon, also known as Graciela Chacon, also known as Gracie Chacon, also known as Odilia Chacon, also known as Odilia G. Chacon, Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before KING, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 699
Pages: 352–352

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Odilia Graciela CHACON, also known as Grace Chacon, also known as Graciela Chacon, also known as Gracie Chacon, also known as Odilia Chacon, also known as Odilia G. Chacon, Defendant-Appellant
No. 17-50089 Conference Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed October 24, 2017
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Odilia Graciela Chacon, Pro Se
Before KING, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
. The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Odilia Graciela Chacon has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Cha-con has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cíe. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.