Case Name: CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. ZIP MAIL SERVICES, INC., Appellant/Cross-Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-01-19
Citations: 984 S.W.2d 567
Docket Number: Nos. 73887, 73930
Parties: CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. ZIP MAIL SERVICES, INC., Appellant/Cross-Respondent.
Judges: Before JAMES R. DOWD, P.J., and CRAHAN and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 984
Pages: 567–567

Head Matter:
CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. ZIP MAIL SERVICES, INC., Appellant/Cross-Respondent.
Nos. 73887, 73930.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Jan. 19, 1999.
Alan G. Gerson, Blumenfeld, Kaplan & Sandweiss, St. Louis, for appellant.
Vincent D. Vogler, Donald A. Horowitz, The Vogler Law Firm, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before JAMES R. DOWD, P.J., and CRAHAN and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Casualty Insurance Company ("Casualty") brought a claim against Zip Mail Services, Inc. ("Zip Mail") for determination of the amount of workers' compensation insurance premiums owed. Zip Mail brought a counterclaim. The jury entered a verdict in favor of Zip Mail on both claims. Zip Mail now appeals from the trial court's grant of judgment notwithstanding the verdict on Zip Mail's counterclaim. Casualty cross-appeals from the judgment entered in favor of Zip Mail on Casualty's claim.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file and record on appeal and no error of law exists. No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an extended opinion reciting detailed facts and restating principles of law. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).