Case Name: WATSON et ux, Petitioners, v. OREGON LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1978-01-16
Citations: 32 Or. App. 161
Docket Number: No. CA 8995
Parties: WATSON et ux, Petitioners, v. OREGON LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION, Respondent.
Judges: Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Lee, Buttler and Joseph, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 32
Pages: 161–163

Head Matter:
Argued December 22, 1977,
affirmed January 16, 1978
WATSON et ux, Petitioners, v. OREGON LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION, Respondent.
(No. CA 8995)
573 P2d 319
Michael J. Bird, Grants Pass, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Brown, Hughes, Bird & Lane, Grants Pass.
Jan P. Londahl, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were James A Redden, Attorney General, Al J. Laue, Solicitor General, and Melinda L. Bruce, Assistant Attorney General, Salem.
Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Lee, Buttler and Joseph, Judges.
PER CURIAM.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The sole question in this case is whether there is substantial evidence supporting the finding of the Oregon Liquor Control Commission that petitioners, through an employe, sold an alcoholic beverage to a minor. While the evidence is not overwhelming, it is sufficient to support the finding.
Affirmed.