Case Name: John DE PENA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-04-12
Citations: 652 So. 2d 1273
Docket Number: No. 93-2026
Parties: John DE PENA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before HUBBART, COPE and GREEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 652
Pages: 1273–1274

Head Matter:
John DE PENA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 93-2026.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 12, 1995.
Kieran P. Fallon, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Paul M. Gayle-Smith, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before HUBBART, COPE and GREEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal by the defendant John De Pena from judgments of convictions and sentences for (1) first-degree murder [§ 782.04(l)(a)(l), Fla.Stat. (1991)], (2) conspiracy to commit first-degree murder [§ 777.04(3), 782.04(l)(a)(l), Fla.Stat. (1991) ], and (3) display of a firearm during the commission of a felony, to wit: first-degree murder [§ 790.07(2), Fla.Stat. (1991)], which were entered below based on an adverse jury verdict. We reject, as having no merit, the defendant's contentions on appeal that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the convictions on the murder and conspiracy counts, that an evidentiary error was committed at trial, and the jury verdicts were inconsistent. See § 90.404(2)(a), Fla.Stat. (1993); A.B.G. v. State, 586 So.2d 445 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), cause dismissed, 605 So.2d 1261 (Fla.1992); Vieyra v. State, 562 So.2d 435 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Lazarowicz v. State, 561 So .2d 392 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Smith v. State, 507 So.2d 788, 790 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Shockey v. State, 338 So.2d 33 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976), cert. denied, 345 So.2d 427 (Fla.1977); McClamrock v. State, 327 So.2d 780 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975).
Affirmed.