Case Name: Joseph WOJCICKI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AIKEN TECHNICAL COLLEGE; Susan A. Winsor, ex Graham ATC president; William Tilt, Associate Vice President of Technical Education; Thomas Desrocher, Program Coordinator; Lee Powell, Human Resources Director, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-12-26
Citations: 501 F. App'x 286
Docket Number: No. 12-2086
Parties: Joseph WOJCICKI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AIKEN TECHNICAL COLLEGE; Susan A. Winsor, ex Graham ATC president; William Tilt, Associate Vice President of Technical Education; Thomas Desrocher, Program Coordinator; Lee Powell, Human Resources Director, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 501
Pages: 286–287

Head Matter:
Joseph WOJCICKI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AIKEN TECHNICAL COLLEGE; Susan A. Winsor, ex Graham ATC president; William Tilt, Associate Vice President of Technical Education; Thomas Desrocher, Program Coordinator; Lee Powell, Human Resources Director, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 12-2086.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 20, 2012.
Decided: Dec. 26, 2012.
Joseph Wojcicki, Appellant Pro Se. Charles J. Boykin, Kimberly Ann Gertner, BOYKIN & DAVIS, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Joseph Wojcicki appeals the district court's orders adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation to grant Defendants' motion for summary judgment and to dismiss his employment discrimination complaint, and denying Wojcicki's motions for relief from that judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Wojcicki v. Aiken Technical Coll., No. 1:06— cv-00461-MBS, 2012 WL 3596161 (D.S.C. filed Sept. 80, 2011 & entered Oct. 3, 2011; Aug. 21, 2012). We deny Wojcicki's motion to add three new defendants to this action. Out of an abundance of caution, though, we grant Wojcicki's motion to seal the documents filed in this appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.