Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Elizabeth Marie RUSHING, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-10-03
Citations: 698 F. App'x 103
Docket Number: No. 17-6666
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Elizabeth Marie RUSHING, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 698
Pages: 103–104

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Elizabeth Marie RUSHING, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 17-6666
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: September 28, 2017
Decided: October 3, 2017
Elizabeth Marie Rushing-Floyd, Appellant Pro Se. Gill Paul Beck, Sr., Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina; William A. Brafford, Jonathan Henry Ferry, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Tiffany Mallory Moore, Jennifer A. Youngs, Assistant United States Attorneys, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Elizabeth Rushing appeals the district court's order denying her motion for modification of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Rushing, No. 3:00-cr-00008-FDW-7 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 21, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED