Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesus DIAZ-ROJAS, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1972-03-06
Citations: 457 F.2d 797
Docket Number: No. 71-1677
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesus DIAZ-ROJAS, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 457
Pages: 797–798

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesus DIAZ-ROJAS, Appellant.
No. 71-1677.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
March 6, 1972.
Richard S. Henderson, San Diego, Cal., for appellant.
Michael Quinton, Brian E. Michaels, Asst. U. S. Attys., Harry D. Steward, U. S. Atty., Stephen G. Nelson, Asst. U. S. Atty. & Chief, Criminal Div., San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before CHAMBERS and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges, and BYRNE , District Judge.
The Honorable William M. Byrne, Senior District Judge, Central District of California, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of conviction in this marijuana smuggling (plus receiving, concealing and facilitating) case is affirmed.
The district court could and did properly find that the search was consented to by all of the interested parties.
The lesser included offense point has no merit. United States v. Johnston, 440 F.2d 389 (9 Cir. 1971).
The defendant-appellant can present his point on sentencing by a motion in the trial court under Rule 35, F.R.Cr.P. The mandate will issue now.