Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. David MISSEY, Sr., Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-04-13
Citations: 131 S.W.3d 858
Docket Number: No. ED 82873
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. David MISSEY, Sr., Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 131
Pages: 858–859

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. David MISSEY, Sr., Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 82873.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
April 13, 2004.
Amy M. Bartholow, Columbia, for Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Stephanie Morrell, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for Respondent.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
David Missey, Sr., (Defendant) appeals from the trial court's judgment and sentence imposed after a jury found him guilty of one count of first-degree statutory sodomy, in violation of Section 566.062 and punishable under Section 558.011.1. The jury recommended that the trial court sentence Defendant to twenty-five years imprisonment. Following a pre-sentence investigation and allocution, the trial court adopted the jury's recommendation and sentenced Defendant to twenty-five years imprisonment.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would have no jurisprudential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
. All statutory references are to RSMo 1994, unless otherwise noted.