Case Name: TRITON HOLDINGS, INC., Appellant, v. FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA, etc., et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1998-12-30
Citations: 723 So. 2d 377
Docket Number: No. 98-767
Parties: TRITON HOLDINGS, INC., Appellant, v. FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA, etc., et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before JORGENSON, LEVY, and SHEVIN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 723
Pages: 377–378

Head Matter:
TRITON HOLDINGS, INC., Appellant, v. FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA, etc., et al., Appellees.
No. 98-767.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 30, 1998.
J.R. Mazor & Associates, P.A., and Jeffrey R. Mazor, Hollywood, for appellant.
Robert J. Schaffer, Coral Gables, for ap-pellee Virginia R. Pietro.
Before JORGENSON, LEVY, and SHEVIN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Contrary to the appellant's arguments, joint depositors must both be served with notice of garnishment proceedings to comport with due process of law. See § 77.055, Fla. Stat. (1995). Accordingly, the trial court was correct in finding that the notice was deficient.
Affirmed.