Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Joanna Espinoza REYNA, also known as Joanna Reyna Espinoza, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-06-21
Citations: 653 F. App'x 251
Docket Number: No. 15-11160
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Joanna Espinoza REYNA, also known as Joanna Reyna Espinoza, Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before JONES, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 653
Pages: 251–252

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Joanna Espinoza REYNA, also known as Joanna Reyna Espinoza, Defendant-Appellant
No. 15-11160
Conference Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Date Filed: 06/21/2016
James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Kevin Joel Page, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, David E. Sloan, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Lubbock, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before JONES, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Joanna Espinoza Reyna raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Shabazz, 633 F.3d 342, 345-46 (5th Cir. 2011), which held that the phrase "on any such revocation" in 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) does not impose an aggregate limit on imprisonment for revocation of supervised release but limits only the amount of imprisonment that may be imposed each time a court revokes a defendant's supervised release. Accordingly, the motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the alternative motion for an extension of time to file a bi'ief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.