Case Name: Thomas PANNIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2003-06-04
Citations: 849 So. 2d 1105
Docket Number: No. 4D02-1931
Parties: Thomas PANNIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SHAHOOD, GROSS and MAY, JJ„ concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 849
Pages: 1105–1106

Head Matter:
Thomas PANNIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D02-1931.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
June 4, 2003.
Rehearing Denied Aug. 6, 2003.
Thomas Pannier, Crawfordville, pro se.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Georgina Jimenez-Orosa, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant seeks review of an order summarily denying his motion to correct illegal sentence. In his notice of appeal, he also seeks review of the trial court's unwritten order denying his ore tenus motion to withdraw plea. We affirm the order summarily denying Appellant's motion to correct illegal sentence and dismiss the appeal to the extent that Appellant also seeks our review of the trial court's unwritten order denying his ore tenus motion. We lack jurisdiction to hear an appeal of an unwritten or unsigned order. See State v. Siegel, 662 So.2d 1013 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)(observing that court lacks jurisdiction to hear an appeal of an unwritten or unsigned order); State v. Smith, 557 So.2d 904 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)(holding that District Court of Appeal lacked jurisdiction to review oral orders of trial court where such orders had not been reduced to writing); and Fla.R.App.P. 9.020(h)
SHAHOOD, GROSS and MAY, JJ" concur.