Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Reginald Jerome STOWE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-10-07
Citations: 333 F. App'x 787
Docket Number: No. 09-7492
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Reginald Jerome STOWE, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 333
Pages: 787–787

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Reginald Jerome STOWE, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 09-7492.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 28, 2009.
Decided: Oct. 7, 2009.
Reginald Jerome Stowe, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Reginald Jerome Stowe appeals the district court's orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006), and his post-judgment motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Stowe, No. 3:96-cr-00046-FDW-1 (W.D.N.C. July 21 & 31, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.