Case Name: Alfred E. Kenney, trustee, &c., complainant-respondent, v. Elmer King et al., defendants-respondents
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1922-06-20
Citations: 93 N.J. Eq. 688
Docket Number: 
Parties: Alfred E. Kenney, trustee, &c., complainant-respondent, v. Elmer King et al., defendants-respondents.
Judges: For affirmance — Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, B,lack, Katzenraoi-i,. White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Bus-kirk — 14. ....
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 93
Pages: 688–688

Head Matter:
Alfred E. Kenney, trustee, &c., complainant-respondent, v. Elmer King et al., defendants-respondents.
[Decided June 20th, 1922.]
Appeal of John P. Eamsey, administrator, &c., defendant-appellant.
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Baches, whose opinion is printed with the last preceding case.
Messrs. McCarter & English, for the defendant-appellant. Eamsey.
Messrs. Lum, Tamblyn & Colyer, for the complainant-respondent.
Messrs. King & Vogi\, for the defendants-respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We agree with the finding of facts by the vice-chancellor and the propriety of the deciee based on those facts. The decree is therefore affirmed.
For affirmance — Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, B,lack, Katzenraoi-i,. White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Bus-kirk — 14. .
For reversal — None.