Case Name: In re: Timothy B. BURNHAM, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-04-25
Citations: 126 F. App'x 621
Docket Number: No. 04-8012
Parties: In re: Timothy B. BURNHAM, Petitioner.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 126
Pages: 621–621

Head Matter:
In re: Timothy B. BURNHAM, Petitioner.
No. 04-8012.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 1, 2005.
Decided April 25, 2005.
Timothy B. Burnham, Petitioner pro se.
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Timothy B. Burnham petitions for writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Although we find that mandamus relief is not warranted because the delay is not unreasonable, we deny the mandamus petition without prejudice to the filing of another mandamus petition if the district court does not act expeditiously. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED