Case Name: Etta M. COLLIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; et al., Defendants - Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-10-15
Citations: 296 F. App'x 594
Docket Number: No. 08-55714
Parties: Etta M. COLLIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; et al., Defendants — Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 296
Pages: 594–594

Head Matter:
Etta M. COLLIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; et al., Defendants — Appellees.
No. 08-55714.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 6, 2008.
Filed Oct. 15, 2008.
Etta M. Collier, Carson, CA, pro se.
Russell W. Chittenden, USLA-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Timothy J. Krai, Manning & Marder, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: WARDLAW, W. FLETCHER and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
A review of the record and the response to the order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants-appellees.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.