Case Name: Tommy FARRAR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lt. HODGE; Officer Ellis; Officer Curtis; Lieutenant Alford; Lieutenant Meridith; Sergeant McCormick; Officer DiPonte, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-09-10
Citations: 291 F. App'x 503
Docket Number: No. 07-7785
Parties: Tommy FARRAR, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Lt. HODGE; Officer Ellis; Officer Curtis; Lieutenant Alford; Lieutenant Meridith; Sergeant McCormick; Officer DiPonte, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 291
Pages: 503–503

Head Matter:
Tommy FARRAR, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Lt. HODGE; Officer Ellis; Officer Curtis; Lieutenant Alford; Lieutenant Meridith; Sergeant McCormick; Officer DiPonte, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 07-7785.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 21, 2008.
Decided: Sept. 10, 2008.
Tommy Farrar, Appellant Pro Se. John A. Maxfield, County Attorney’s Office for the County of Wake, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Judge Duncan did not participate in consideration of this case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Tommy Farrar appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Farrar v. Hodge, No. 5:06-ct-03079-D (E.D.N.C. Nov. 27, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.