Case Name: ESTATE OF Wayne A. JONES By Robert L. Jones and Bruce A. Jones, Administrators of the Estate of Wayne A. JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF MARTINSBURG, WEST VIRGINIA; PFC. Erik Herb; PFC. Daniel North; PTLM. William Staubs; PTLM. Paul Lehman; PFC. Eric Npely, Defendants-Appellees, and Martinsburg Police Department; Does 1 TO 25, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-07-06
Citations: 655 F. App'x 948
Docket Number: No. 14-2135
Parties: ESTATE OF Wayne A. JONES By Robert L. Jones and Bruce A. Jones, Administrators of the Estate of Wayne A. JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF MARTINSBURG, WEST VIRGINIA; PFC. Erik Herb; PFC. Daniel North; PTLM. William Staubs; PTLM. Paul Lehman; PFC. Eric Npely, Defendants-Appellees, and Martinsburg Police Department; Does 1 TO 25, Defendants.
Judges: Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and Richard L. VOORHEES, United States District Judge for the Western District of North Carolina, sitting by designation.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 655
Pages: 948–956

Head Matter:
ESTATE OF Wayne A. JONES By Robert L. Jones and Bruce A. Jones, Administrators of the Estate of Wayne A. JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF MARTINSBURG, WEST VIRGINIA; PFC. Erik Herb; PFC. Daniel North; PTLM. William Staubs; PTLM. Paul Lehman; PFC. Eric Npely, Defendants-Appellees, and Martinsburg Police Department; Does 1 TO 25, Defendants.
No. 14-2135
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Argued: March 22, 2016
Decided: July 6, 2016
ARGUED: Christopher Edwin Brown, BROWN FIRM, PLLC, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Philip W. Savrin, FREEMAN MATHIS & GARY, LLP, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellees. ON BRIEF: Rocco J. DeLeonardis, CONSUMER LAW, PLLC, Reston, Virginia, for Appellant.
Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and Richard L. VOORHEES, United States District Judge for the Western District of North Carolina, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
Remanded by unpublished order. Judge Gregory directed entry of the order with the concurrence of Judge Duncan. Judge Voorhees wrote a dissent from the order of remand.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
ORDER
GREGORY, Circuit Judge:
In the unique circumstances presented, because the facts admitted as a result of the requests for admission, which formed the basis of the underlying motion to deem requests for admissions admitted, constructively resolved all of the material issues in dispute, giving the motion a dis-positive effect, and because this Court is unable to determine the extent of the district court's rebanee on the admissions, this Court remands the matter to the district court for consideration of the discretionary factors in Rule 36(b) in determining whether to abow the withdrawal of the admissions. This order in no way opines on the merits of such consideration.
REMANDED