Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Mercurio Zoroastro Tovar HERNANDEZ, also known as Mercurio Tobar Hernandez, also known as Mercurio Tovar Hernandez, also known as Mercurio Zoroastro Tovar-Hernandez, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-12-19
Citations: 457 F. App'x 354
Docket Number: No. 11-20133
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Mercurio Zoroastro Tovar HERNANDEZ, also known as Mercurio Tobar Hernandez, also known as Mercurio Tovar Hernandez, also known as Mercurio Zoroastro Tovar-Hernandez, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING, HAYNES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 457
Pages: 354–355

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Mercurio Zoroastro Tovar HERNANDEZ, also known as Mercurio Tobar Hernandez, also known as Mercurio Tovar Hernandez, also known as Mercurio Zoroastro Tovar-Hernandez, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-20133
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 19, 2011.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Lourdes Rodriguez, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before KING, HAYNES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Mercurio Zoroastro Tovar Hernandez (To-var) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). To-var has filed a response seeking the ap pointment of new counsel. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, Tovar's motion to appoint new counsel is DENIED, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.