Case Name: Raymond STOVER, Petitioner, v. BUSHNELL STEEL PRODUCTS DIVISION, the Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1966-06-29
Citations: 187 So. 2d 894
Docket Number: No. 35285
Parties: Raymond STOVER, Petitioner, v. BUSHNELL STEEL PRODUCTS DIVISION, the Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
Judges: THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and-ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 187
Pages: 894–895

Head Matter:
Raymond STOVER, Petitioner, v. BUSHNELL STEEL PRODUCTS DIVISION, the Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
No. 35285.
Supreme Court of Florida.
June 29, 1966.
Leon H. Brush, Miami, Dick Lee, Sarasota, for petitioner.
Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, Albert M. Frierson, Fort Myers, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date February 23, 1966.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
The petition for attorneys' fees is also denied.
It is so ordered.
THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, O'CONNELL, CALDWELL and-ERVIN, JJ., concur.