Case Name: Raymond F. DUCKWORTH, Appellant, v. Rae E. HELMS, Administratrix of the Estate of Charles W. Easterday, Deceased, et al., Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1959-05-21
Citations: 268 F.2d 584
Docket Number: No. 14881
Parties: Raymond F. DUCKWORTH, Appellant, v. Rae E. HELMS, Administratrix of the Estate of Charles W. Easterday, Deceased, et al., Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 268
Pages: 584–584

Head Matter:
Raymond F. DUCKWORTH, Appellant, v. Rae E. HELMS, Administratrix of the Estate of Charles W. Easterday, Deceased, et al., Appellees.
No. 14881.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued April 27, 1959.
Decided May 21, 1959.
Petition for Rehearing En Banc Denied June 12, 1959.
Mr. Arthur J. Hilland, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Ferdinand J. Mack, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellant.
Mr. J. Roy Thompson, Jr., Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. John E. Larson and Benton C. Tolley, Jr., Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellee Helms.
Messrs. Philip S. Peyser and Roger J. Whiteford, Washington, D. C., entered appearances for appellee National Bank of Washington.
Before Bazelon, Washington and Burger, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
After our decision in Helms v. Duck-worth, 1957, 101 U.S.App.D.C. 390, 249 F.2d 482, the case went back for trial. The District Court, sitting as a court of equity, heard evidence adduced by both parties, and rendered judgment for the plaintiffs. The defendant appeals. We think that the trial court correctly interpreted our decision in the earlier appeal, and that no error occurred affecting substantial rights.
Affirmed.
. Annotated in 72 Harv.L.Rev. 555 (1959); 1171 (1958). 36 Tex.L.Rev. 829 (1958); 106 U.Pa.L.Rev.