Case Name: J.A.D., an Infant, by His Mother and Natural Guardian, et al., Respondents, v. Ronald Paul Arevalo, M.D., Appellant, et al., Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2017-04-27
Citations: 149 A.D.3d 664
Docket Number: 
Parties: J.A.D., an Infant, by His Mother and Natural Guardian, et al., Respondents, v Ronald Paul Arevalo, M.D., Appellant, et al., Defendants.
Judges: Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Acosta, Renwick, Moskowitz and Kahn, JJ.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 149
Pages: 664–665

Head Matter:
J.A.D., an Infant, by His Mother and Natural Guardian, et al., Respondents, v Ronald Paul Arevalo, M.D., Appellant, et al., Defendants.
[50 NYS3d 878]

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.), entered September 3, 2015, which, insofar as appealed from, denied the motion of defendant Ronald Paul Arevalo, M.D. for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against him, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The record, which includes conflicting expert affidavits, presents triable issues as to whether defendant Arevalo deviated from good and accepted medical practice, and whether such alleged deviation proximately caused the infant plaintiff's injuries (see generally Dallas-Stephenson v Waisman, 39 AD3d 303, 306-307 [1st Dept 2007]). Plaintiff's expert neonatologist sufficiently raised questions as to whether Arevalo failed to timely diagnose the infant plaintiff's abdominal condition and obtain a surgical consult (see Diaz v New York Downtown Hosp., 99 NY2d 542, 544 [2002]; Cregan v Sachs, 65 AD3d 101, 108-109 [1st Dept 2009]). Although surgery on the infant plaintiff did not occur for 36 hours following the infant's transfer to another facility, this does not warrant a different determination (see Bradley v Soundview Healthcenter, 4 AD3d 194 [1st Dept 2004]).
Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Acosta, Renwick, Moskowitz and Kahn, JJ.