Case Name: Doe, Appellant, v. Doe, Appellee
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1994-10-05
Citations: 70 Ohio St. 3d 469
Docket Number: No. 94-963
Parties: Doe, Appellant, v. Doe, Appellee.
Judges: AW. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 70
Pages: 469–470

Head Matter:
Doe, Appellant, v. Doe, Appellee.
[Cite as Doe v. Doe (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 469.]
(No. 94-963
Submitted September 14, 1994
Decided October 5, 1994.)
Katz, Greenberger & Norton, Richard L. Norton and Ellen Essig, for appellant.
Graydon, Head & Ritchey, Michael R. Barrett and Jean M. Geoppinger, for appellee.

Opinion:
The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Ault v. Jasko (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 114, 637 N.E.2d 870, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for application of Ault.
AW. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Moyer, C.J., and Wright, J., dissent.