Case Name: Israel NUSSBAUM, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-07-09
Citations: 104 F. App'x 158
Docket Number: No. 04-3044
Parties: Israel NUSSBAUM, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.
Judges: Before MAYER, Chief Judge, LOURIE and LINN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 104
Pages: 158–159

Head Matter:
Israel NUSSBAUM, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.
No. 04-3044.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
DECIDED: July 9, 2004.
Rehearing Denied Sept. 2, 2004.
Israel Nussbaum, of Counsel Attorney, Chesterfield, MO, Petitioner Pro Se.
James W. Poirier, Principal Attorney, William F. Ryan, of Counsel Attorney, David M. Cohen, of Counsel Attorney, Margaret E. McGhee, of Counsel Attorney, Department of Justice, Jill Gersten-field, of Counsel Attorney, Office of Personnel Management, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before MAYER, Chief Judge, LOURIE and LINN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Israel Nussbaum seeks review of the final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board affirming the decision of the Office of Personnel Management, which denied his request for a waiver of repayment of an annuity overpayment. Nuss-baum v. Office of Pers. Mgmt, CH831M020201-I-1, 95 M.S.P.R. 296, 2003 WL 22299267 (MSPB Sept. 25, 2003). Because the board did not abuse its discretion and the record substantially supports the board's decision, we affirm,.
The board did not act contrary to 5 U.S.C. § 8346(b), which provides that recovery may not be had from an individual when "the individual is without fault and recovery would be against equity and good conscience." The board reasonably concluded that Nussbaum should have known of the annuity overpayment and should have set it aside. His failure to do so justly precludes equitable relief. Furthermore, the board's conclusion that repayment in this case would neither cause financial hardship nor be unconscionable is supported by the record.