Case Name: Nannette F. BUCKNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JACOB LEW, Secretary, Department of the Treasury, Defendant-Appellee, and TImothy F. Geithner, Secretary, Department of the Treasury; Mariam G. Garvey, Department of the Treasury; Jacqueline Ann Berrien; Robert L. Hunt, Area Director, South Atlantic Area, Collections Operations, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-09-02
Citations: 668 F. App'x 487
Docket Number: No. 15-2523
Parties: Nannette F. BUCKNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JACOB LEW, Secretary, Department of the Treasury, Defendant-Appellee, and TImothy F. Geithner, Secretary, Department of the Treasury; Mariam G. Garvey, Department of the Treasury; Jacqueline Ann Berrien; Robert L. Hunt, Area Director, South Atlantic Area, Collections Operations, Defendants.
Judges: Before AGEE, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 668
Pages: 487–488

Head Matter:
Nannette F. BUCKNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JACOB LEW, Secretary, Department of the Treasury, Defendant-Appellee, and TImothy F. Geithner, Secretary, Department of the Treasury; Mariam G. Garvey, Department of the Treasury; Jacqueline Ann Berrien; Robert L. Hunt, Area Director, South Atlantic Area, Collections Operations, Defendants.
No. 15-2523
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 19, 2016
Decided: September 2, 2016
Nannette F. Buckner, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Gordon James, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before AGEE, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Nannette F. Buckner appeals the district court's order accepting in part and rejecting in part the magistrate judge's recommendation, and granting Defendant's motion for summary judgment in Buckner's employment discrimination action. Buckner also appeals the district court's order denying her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Buckner v. Lew, No. 5:13-cv-00199-FL (E.D.N.C. Sept. 30, 2015 & Nov. 2, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED