Case Name: Curtis NIXON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WOLFE, OFFICER, Defendant-Appellee, and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-08-23
Citations: 42 F. App'x 668
Docket Number: No. 02-6558
Parties: Curtis NIXON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WOLFE, OFFICER, Defendant-Appellee, and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department, Defendant.
Judges: Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 42
Pages: 668–669

Head Matter:
Curtis NIXON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WOLFE, OFFICER, Defendant-Appellee, and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department, Defendant.
No. 02-6558.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 31, 2002.
Decided Aug. 23, 2002.
Curtis Nixon, Appellant Pro Se. Frank Bayard Aycock, III, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Curtis Nixon appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2002) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Nixon v. Wolfe, No. CA-00-192 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 14, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.