Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Trent BREWER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-09-21
Citations: 344 F. App'x 947
Docket Number: No. 08-41142
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Trent BREWER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 344
Pages: 947–948

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Trent BREWER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-41142
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Sept. 21, 2009.
Ernest Gonzalez, U.S. Attorney’s Office Eastern District of Texas, Plano, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Trent Brewer, McKinney, TX, pro se.
Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Trent Brewer seeks to appeal the 360-month sentence he received after he pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. In his written plea agreement, Brewer waived his right to appeal his sentence on all grounds, except he reserved the right to appeal (a) any punishment imposed in excess of the statutory maximum and (b) a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel that affects the validity of the waiver itself. He argues that the appeal waiver is not enforceable because the Government breached the plea agreement when it recommended at sentencing that Brewer not be given a three-level reduction for acceptance of responsibility.
This court pretermits the issue whether the Government breached the plea agreement and finds that Brewer's challenge to his sentence is unavailing. Given Brewer's use of a cell phone in violation of jail rules, the district court did not clearly err when it denied him a three-level reduction for acceptance of responsibility. See United States v. Gonzales, 19 F.3d 982, 983 (5th Cir.1994); U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1, comment. (n.l(b)). Nor has Brewer rebutted the presumption that his sentence, at the bottom of the guidelines range of imprisonment, is reasonable. See United States v. Alonzo, 435 F.3d 551, 554 (5th Cir.2006).
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.