Case Name: GLAMORGAN COAL CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. Banner E. MARSHALL, deceased, by Beulah Marshall, widow; Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, Respondents
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-11-13
Citations: 351 F. App'x 821
Docket Number: No. 08-2222
Parties: GLAMORGAN COAL CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. Banner E. MARSHALL, deceased, by Beulah Marshall, widow; Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, Respondents.
Judges: Before KING, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 351
Pages: 821–822

Head Matter:
GLAMORGAN COAL CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. Banner E. MARSHALL, deceased, by Beulah Marshall, widow; Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, Respondents.
No. 08-2222.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 21, 2009.
Decided: Nov. 13, 2009.
Timothy W. Gresham, Anne Musgrove Rife, Penn, Stuart & Eskridge, Abingdon, Virginia, for Petitioner. Joseph E. Wolfe, Ryan C. Gilligan, Wolfe, Williams, Rutherford & Reynolds, Norton, Virginia; Carol De Deo, Deputy Solicitor, Rae Ellen Frank James, Associate Solicitor, Sean G. Bajkowski, Counsel for Appellate Litigation, Jeffrey S. Goldberg, United States Department of Labor, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.
Before KING, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Glamorgan Coal Corporation seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's award of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. § 901-945 (2006). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. Glamorgan Coal Corp. v. Marshall, No. 07-0960-BLA (B.R.B. Aug. 29, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.