Case Name: Harry Lee GREEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Matthew D. GATLING; Martha McElveen Horne; Patty Patterson; Sumter City Police Department, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-11-17
Citations: 206 F. App'x 259
Docket Number: No. 06-1824
Parties: Harry Lee GREEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Matthew D. GATLING; Martha McElveen Horne; Patty Patterson; Sumter City Police Department, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 206
Pages: 259–259

Head Matter:
Harry Lee GREEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Matthew D. GATLING; Martha McElveen Horne; Patty Patterson; Sumter City Police Department, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 06-1824.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 15, 2006.
Decided: Nov. 17, 2006.
Harry L. Green, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred Johnston Cox, Ellis, Lawhorne & Sims, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Harry Lee Green seeks to appeal the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.
Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court's final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corr., 434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (1960)).
The district court's judgment was entered on the docket on June 14, 2006, and Green filed his notice of appeal on July 17, 2006. Because Green has failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.