Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. James SHIELDS, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-10-24
Citations: 29 S.W.3d 407
Docket Number: No. ED 77096
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. James SHIELDS, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., P.J., and MARY RHODES RUSSELL and TEITELMAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 29
Pages: 407–407

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. James SHIELDS, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 77096.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Oct. 24, 2000.
S. Paige Canfield, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Linda Lemke, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., P.J., and MARY RHODES RUSSELL and TEITELMAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
James Shields (Defendant) appeals from the judgment upon his convictions by a jury of statutory rape in the first degree, Section 566.032, RSMo 1994; statutory sodomy in the first degree, Section 566.062, RSMo 1994; and child molestation in the first degree, Section 566.067, RSMo 1994, for which Defendant was sentenced to life imprisonment, life imprisonment, and seven years' imprisonment, respectively, with the sentences to run concurrently.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).