Case Name: Richard L. BRANT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-06-05
Citations: 817 So. 2d 1039
Docket Number: No. 3D02-1289
Parties: Richard L. BRANT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before JORGENSON, LEVY, and RAMIREZ, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 817
Pages: 1039–1039

Head Matter:
Richard L. BRANT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D02-1289.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
June 5, 2002.
Richard L. Brant, in proper person.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before JORGENSON, LEVY, and RAMIREZ, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the denial of appellant Richard L. Brant's motion for post-conviction relief as to grounds 4 and 5. Denial of defense motions for acquittal, on the charges of possession with intent to sell and for aggravated assault on law enforcement, are not cognizable under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See, e.g. Johnson v. State, 649 So.2d 948 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)(issue which can be brought on direct appeal not cognizable by motion for post conviction relief).