Case Name: Timothy C. WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2019-02-26
Citations: 568 S.W.3d 88
Docket Number: No. ED 106426
Parties: Timothy C. WRIGHT, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 568
Pages: 88–88

Head Matter:
Timothy C. WRIGHT, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 106426
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Filed: February 26, 2019
FOR APPELLANTS: William J. Swift, Woodrail Centre, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, Missouri 65203.
FOR RESPONDENTS: Daniel N. McPhearson, Eric Schmitt, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.
Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Timothy Wright appeals the denial following an evidentiary hearing of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief based on a single allegation of ineffective assistance of counsel. He contends the motion court clearly erred by denying his claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to call his wife, Tiffany Pulliam, as a trial witness, to testify that he was at their apartment between 4:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. on February 15, 2014. We disagree and affirm.
The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).