Case Name: Wendy J. PAULUK, Psy.D, individually and as personal representative of the proposed Estate of Daniel Pauluk; Jaime L. Pauluk; Chrissy J. Pauluk, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Glenn SAVAGE, an individual; Edward Wojcik, an individual, Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-09-08
Citations: 668 F. App'x 791
Docket Number: No. 14-15027
Parties: Wendy J. PAULUK, Psy.D, individually and as personal representative of the proposed Estate of Daniel Pauluk; Jaime L. Pauluk; Chrissy J. Pauluk, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Glenn SAVAGE, an individual; Edward Wojcik, an individual, Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: Before: NOONAN, W. FLETCHER, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 668
Pages: 791–792

Head Matter:
Wendy J. PAULUK, Psy.D, individually and as personal representative of the proposed Estate of Daniel Pauluk; Jaime L. Pauluk; Chrissy J. Pauluk, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Glenn SAVAGE, an individual; Edward Wojcik, an individual, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 14-15027
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Filed September 08, 2016
John J. Tofano, Esquire, Attorney, John J. Tofano, Attorney At Law, Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.
Peter Maitland Angulo, Esquire, Walter R. Cannon, Esquire, Attorneys, Olson, Cannon, Gormley, Angulo & Stoberski, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendants-Appellants.
Before: NOONAN, W. FLETCHER, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
This court's Memorandum Disposition filed February 29, 2016, and reported at 641 Fed.Appx. 756 (9th Cir.2016), is withdrawn, and is replaced by the attached Opinion and Dissents. With the filing of the new Opinion, the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc.
Subsequent petitions for rehearing and petitions for rehearing en banc may be filed.