Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roy Edward TAYLOR, a/k/a Big Roy, a/k/a Roy Penn, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-10-02
Citations: 332 F. App'x 821
Docket Number: No. 08-8293
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roy Edward TAYLOR, a/k/a Big Roy, a/k/a Roy Penn, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 332
Pages: 821–822

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roy Edward TAYLOR, a/k/a Big Roy, a/k/a Roy Penn, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-8293.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 17, 2009.
Decided: Oct. 2, 2009.
Roy Edward Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Barrett Hudson, Assistant United States Attorney, Bruce A. Pagel, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlottes-ville, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Roy Edward Taylor appeals the district court's order granting his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), and its subsequent order denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Taylor, No. 3:99-cr- 00076-nkm-1 (W.D.Va. Sept. 23, 2008; Oct. 17, 2008). See United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 129 S.Ct. 2401, 173 L.Ed.2d 1296 (2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.