Case Name: In the Matter of Thomas B. Daubner, Petitioner, and Louis Okin, Respondent, v. David N. Dinkins et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, and Seymour Schwartz and Irving Chin, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1973-09-20
Citations: 42 A.D.2d 890
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Thomas B. Daubner, Petitioner, and Louis Okin, Respondent, v. David N. Dinkins et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, and Seymour Schwartz and Irving Chin, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 42
Pages: 890–890

Head Matter:
(September 20, 1973)
In the Matter of Thomas B. Daubner, Petitioner, and Louis Okin, Respondent, v. David N. Dinkins et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, and Seymour Schwartz and Irving Chin, Appellants.

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on September 11, 1973, affirmed, without costs and without disbursements, with leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Kupferman, Murphy and Macken, JJ.; Nunez, J., dissents in the following memorandum: I dissent. Petitioners did not establish the probability of a different result absent the irregularities. I fully agree with the ¡Special Referee's findings and his recommendation that the petitions shohld be dismissed.