Case Name: Eleanor Guidetti et al., Respondents, v. Columbus Hospital, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1962-07-03
Citations: 17 A.D.2d 609
Docket Number: 
Parties: Eleanor Guidetti et al., Respondents, v. Columbus Hospital, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 17
Pages: 609–609

Head Matter:
Eleanor Guidetti et al., Respondents, v. Columbus Hospital, Appellant.

Opinion:
Judgment in favor of plaintiffs, after a trial before a court without a jury, unanimously reversed on the law and on the facts, with costs to appellant, and the complaint dismissed. The trial court found that plaintiff, Eleanor Guidetti, suffered an injury while a patient in defendant's hospital, because of the negligence of defendant in failing to provide side boards on the patient's bed. That conclusion was reached on the basis of a finding that defendant's employees should have been aware of the physical and mental condition of the patient in sufficient time to have provided side boards for her safety. In our view of the evidence, no negligence on the part of the defendant was proven. The patient was admitted in the morning of December 10, 1957 and the accident occurred at about 6:00 p.m. on the following day. She was attended by her own private physician, who gave all the instructions for her care and medication; but he gave no directions nor any indication that bed rails were required. In fact, the nurses were informed by the physician that the patient was to have " bathroom privileges." Upon the proof in this ease we find that under all of the circumstances of the admission, treatment and care of the patient, there was no negligence in failing to supply side boards to the patient before the accident happened, and that the employees of the hospital could not reasonably anticipate that bed rails would be needed to prevent the patient from falling out of bed. In view of this finding, we should — since the case was tried by the court without a jury — grant the motion for judgment which the court below ought to have granted (Civ. Prac. Act, § 584, subd. 2; Calabria v. City & Suburban Homes Co., 5 A D 2d 983, affd. 5 N Y 2d 918; Greater N. Y. Ins. Co. v. Perry, 6 A D 2d 432, 437). Settle order on notice. Concur — Botein, P. J., Valente, Stevens, Steuer and Bergan, JJ.