Case Name: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. ELCO CORPORATION, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1967-05-05
Citations: 378 F.2d 62
Docket Number: No. 21298
Parties: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. ELCO CORPORATION, Respondent.
Judges: Before BARNES and BROWNING, Circuit Judges, and SMITH, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 378
Pages: 62–62

Head Matter:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. ELCO CORPORATION, Respondent.
No. 21298.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
May 5, 1967.
Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Robert M. Lieber, Attys., N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., Ralph E. Kennedy, Director, N. L. R. B., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
John E. Carroll, Long Beach, Cal., James D. Hughes, La Mirada, Cal., for appellee.
Before BARNES and BROWNING, Circuit Judges, and SMITH, District Judge.
Russell E. Smith, United States District Judge, District of Montana, sitting by designation-

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Had this court been called upon to pass originally on the merits of this case, we might have disagreed with the ultimate conclusion of the Board, but that is not the test for reversal. There exists in the record, in our opinion, sufficient evidence sufficiently substantial to sustain the Board's conclusion.
The order will be enforced.