Case Name: Dayton Bar Association v. Austin
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1997-12-31
Citations: 80 Ohio St. 3d 440
Docket Number: No. 97-1748
Parties: Dayton Bar Association v. Austin.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 80
Pages: 440–441

Head Matter:
Dayton Bar Association v. Austin.
[Cite as Dayton Bar Assn. v. Austin (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 440.]
(No. 97-1748
Submitted October 7, 1997
Decided December 31, 1997.)
John M. Ruffolo, for relator.
Gary J. Leppla, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We adopt the findings and conclusions of the board. Based upon the mitigating circumstances, we find, as recommended by the board, that respondent ought to be and he hereby is publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.