Case Name: ANTONIO MUNEZ, PETITIONER, v. ARMOUR FERTILIZER WORKS, RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Department of Labor, Workmen's Compensation Bureau
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1926
Citations: 4 N.J. Misc. 718
Docket Number: 
Parties: ANTONIO MUNEZ, PETITIONER, v. ARMOUR FERTILIZER WORKS, RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 4
Pages: 718–718

Head Matter:
New Jersey Department of Labor, Workmen’s Compensation Bureau.
ANTONIO MUNEZ, PETITIONER, v. ARMOUR FERTILIZER WORKS, RESPONDENT.

Opinion:
Eormal petition for compensation having been filed herein, and the matter having been duly noticed for trial before me, at Newark, New Jersey, on the 4th day of August, 1926, the attorney for the petitioner having failed to appear to move this case for trial, it further appearing that the attorney for the petitioner did, on July 2d, 1926, at Perth Amboy, New Jersey, fail to appear and move this case for trial, and it further appearing that on both of the above dates the claimant failed to appear, it is ordered that the petition herein be dismissed because of the non-appearance and failure to prosecute on the part of the petitioner herein.
Harry J. Goas, .
Deputy Commissioner.