Case Name: Glenn VALENTINE, Movant-Respondent, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent-Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1989-09-26
Citations: 792 S.W.2d 631
Docket Number: No. 56109
Parties: Glenn VALENTINE, Movant-Respondent, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 792
Pages: 631–631

Head Matter:
Glenn VALENTINE, Movant-Respondent, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent-Appellant.
No. 56109.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Sept. 26, 1989.
William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., William J. Swift, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent-appellant.
Raymond A. Bruntrager, St. Louis, for movant-respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
The state appeals from a judgment granting movant's Rule 27.26 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).