Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Don Antonio DANDRIDGE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-03-08
Citations: 122 F. App'x 668
Docket Number: No. 04-4656
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Don Antonio DANDRIDGE, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 122
Pages: 668–669

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Don Antonio DANDRIDGE, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 04-4656.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 18, 2005.
Decided: March 8, 2005.
John P. Bradwell, Shortridge & Shortridge, P.C., Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellant.
John L. Brownlee, United States Attorney, R. Lucas Hobbs, Assistant United States Attorney, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Don Antonio Dandridge appeals from his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm. On appeal, he challenges the denial of his motions to suppress and to dismiss his indictment. We have reviewed the briefs and joint appendix and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. (See J.A. at 17-19, 23, 38-48). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED