Case Name: Pita M. LATU, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-06-27
Citations: 237 F. App'x 304
Docket Number: No. 06-70952
Parties: Pita M. LATU, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: LEAVY, T.G. NELSON and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 237
Pages: 304–304

Head Matter:
Pita M. LATU, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 06-70952.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 4, 2007 .
Filed June 27, 2007.
Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, John R. Cunningham, Esq., Norah Ascoli Schwarz, Esq., DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Offiee of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: LEAVY, T.G. NELSON and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Pita M. Latu seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals upholding an immigration judge's order denying Latu's application for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review the discretionary determination that an applicant has failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying relative, see Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 890 (9th Cir.2003), and petitioner does not raise a colorable due process claim, see Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005) ("traditional abuse of discretion challenges recast as alleged due process violations do not constitute colorable constitutional claims that would invoke our jurisdiction").
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.