Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose M. GOMEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-10-28
Citations: 456 F. App'x 659
Docket Number: No. 11-50068
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose M. GOMEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: TROTT, GOULD, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 456
Pages: 659–659

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose M. GOMEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-50068.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 25, 2011.
Filed Oct. 28, 2011.
Bruce R. Castetter, Assistant U.S., Robert Steven Huie, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Rosemarie Maliekel, Esquire, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: TROTT, GOULD, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Jose M. Gomez appeals from the 46-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Gomez contends that the district court failed to respond adequately to his argument that his criminal history category classification overrepresented the seriousness of his criminal history. The district court did not err, must less plainly err, in rejecting that argument. See United States v. Blinkinsop, 606 F.3d 1110, 1114-17 (9th Cir.2010).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.