Case Name: BOWDISH v. WILLIAMS et al.
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1923-03-27
Citations: 89 Okla. 99
Docket Number: No. 10611
Parties: BOWDISH v. WILLIAMS et al.
Judges: JOHNSON, O. J., and McNETLL, KANE,-KENNAMER, and COCHRAN. J.T., concur.
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 89
Pages: 99–100

Head Matter:
BOWDISH v. WILLIAMS et al.
No. 10611
Opinion Filed March 27, 1923.
(Syllabus.)
Appeal and Error — Dismissal—Failure to Revive Cause.
Where it is made to appear that defendant in error departed this life in 1920, and nothing has been done by plaintiff in error to revive the cause, the same will be dismissed.
Error from District Court, Greer County; T. P. Clay, Judge.
Action by G. P. Bowdish against W. P. Williams et al. Prom the judgment, plaintiff brings error.
Dismissed.
Peyton E. Brown, for plaintiff in error.
B. L. Tisinger, for defendants in error.

Opinion:
BRANSON, ,T.
Plaintiff in error filed his petition-in-error in this court on May 20, 1919, complaining of a judgment rendered against him in the district court of Greer county, Okla. Attached to said petitipn-in-error was a ease-made, duly signed and certified.
It is now made to appear to this court by affidavit duly filed herein that the principal defendant in said cause, W. P. Williams, departed this life at Walters, Okla., on the 13th day of January, 1920. The motion to dismiss the appeal, to which said affidavit is attached, shows due service upon counsel for plaintiff in error on the 19th day of Pebruary, 1923. No response has been filed to said motion to dismiss.
Long prior to the filing of said last-mentioned motion to dismiss this appeal, a motion had been filed to dismiss the same, whereupon counsel for plaintiff in error asked permission to revive the cause by making the personal representative of the said principal defendant a party to this action. This was not done. Later, on direction of the Justice to whom this cause was assigned, the clerk of this court addressed a letter to counsel for plaintiff in error, calling attention to the fact that the cause had not been revived, as provided by chapter 60, art. 27, Rev. Laws 1910, to which letter no response was received by the clerk, and no action to revive said cause in any wise taken by counsel for plaintiff in error.
It is, therefore, the opinion of this court. that this appeal should be, and the same is hereby, dismissed.
JOHNSON, O. J., and McNETLL, KANE,-KENNAMER, and COCHRAN. J.T., concur.