Case Name: GEORGE PALM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, PROSECUTOR-APPELLANT, v. EDWARD BAHR, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1933-04-27
Citations: 110 N.J.L. 455
Docket Number: 
Parties: GEORGE PALM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, PROSECUTOR-APPELLANT, v. EDWARD BAHR, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 110
Pages: 455–455

Head Matter:
GEORGE PALM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, PROSECUTOR-APPELLANT, v. EDWARD BAHR, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Submitted February 17, 1933
Decided April 27, 1933.
For the prosecutor-appellant, Emil Neblo.
For the defendant-respondent, Kalisch •& Kalisch.

Opinion:
Pee Cueiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court. See, also, Thomas v. Liondale Bleach, Dye and Print Works, 10 N. J. Mis. R. 255.
For affirmance — The Chahcellob, Chiee Justice, Paeicee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Hehee, Yah Buskiek, Kays, Heteield, Deae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.