Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Elan Christopher LEWIS, a/k/a Jamal Xavier Harris, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-09-13
Citations: 478 F. App'x 32
Docket Number: No. 12-6781
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Elan Christopher LEWIS, a/k/a Jamal Xavier Harris, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 478
Pages: 32–32

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Elan Christopher LEWIS, a/k/a Jamal Xavier Harris, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-6781.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 11, 2012.
Decided: Sept. 13, 2012.
Elan Christopher Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. David Thomas Maguire, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Elan Christopher Lewis appeals the district court's orders denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Lewis's § 3582(c)(2) motion for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lewis, No. 3:94-cr-00094-JAG-1 (E.D.Va. Apr. 10, 2012). We also affirm the denial of Lewis's motion to reconsider, noting that the district court lacked authority to even consider the motion. See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir.2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.