Case Name: ROYAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, v. Anna CARROLL, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1929-12-17
Citations: 37 F.2d 93
Docket Number: No. 5826
Parties: ROYAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, v. Anna CARROLL, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 37
Pages: 93–93

Head Matter:
ROYAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, v. Anna CARROLL, Appellee.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
December 17, 1929.
Rehearing Denied January 28, 1930.
No. 5826.
Ford & Johnson, of San Francisco, Cal., and F. A. Cutler, of Burlingame, Cal., for appellant.
Joseph A. Brown, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.
Before RUDKIN, DIETRICH, and WILBUR, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.
In all respects this case is like Royal Indemnity Company v. Morris (No. 5824) 37 F.(2d) 90, and by stipulation it is ruled by our decision in that case.
Accordingly, the judgment will be reversed, with directions to take further proceedings not inconsistent with the views therein expressed.