Case Name: Vero Planing Mill Company, a Corporation, Plaintiff in Error, v. Owen C. Pearce, Defendant in Error
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1927-05-27
Citations: 93 Fla. 1100
Docket Number: 
Parties: Vero Planing Mill Company, a Corporation, Plaintiff in Error, v. Owen C. Pearce, Defendant in Error.
Judges: 
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 93
Pages: 1100–1100

Head Matter:
Vero Planing Mill Company, a Corporation, Plaintiff in Error, v. Owen C. Pearce, Defendant in Error.
Division B.
Decision Filed May 27, 1927.
James T. Vocelle, for Plaintiff in Error;
C. P. Diamond, for Defendant in Error.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been sub-
mitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.