Case Name: UNITED STATES, Appellee v. ANASTACIO C. BILLONES, Chief Boatswain's Mate, U. S. Navy, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Military Appeals
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1965-07-23
Citations: 15 C.M.A. 493
Docket Number: No. 18,713
Parties: UNITED STATES, Appellee v ANASTACIO C. BILLONES, Chief Boatswain’s Mate, U. S. Navy, Appellant
Judges: 
Reporter: Decisions of the United States Court of Military Appeals
Volume: 15
Pages: 493–494

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES, Appellee v ANASTACIO C. BILLONES, Chief Boatswain’s Mate, U. S. Navy, Appellant
15 USCMA 493, 35 CMR 465
No. 18,713
July 23, 1965
Fred W. Shields, Esquire, and Lieutenant John P. Meade, USNR, were on the brief for Appellant, Accused.
Major Daniel F. McConnell, USMC, was on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion:
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam:
Tried by general court-martial and convicted, among other things, of an Additional Charge and specification of larceny, in violation of Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 121, 10 USC § 921, the accused was sentenced to dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, confinement at hard labor for ten years, and reduction. Intermediate appellate authorities, reducing the adjudged term of imprisonment to four years, have otherwise affirmed.
Examination of the record reveals that the law officer failed to instruct the court-martial on the elements of the offense alleged in the Additional Charge and specification. Such was prejudicial error. United States v Keith, 1 USCMA 442, 4 CMR 34; United States v Shepard, 1 USCMA 487, 4 CMR 79; United States v Walters, 10 USCMA 598, 28 CMR 164.
The petition for review is granted. The decision of the board of review is reversed, and the record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Navy. The board may reassess the sentence on the basis of the remaining findings of guilty or order a rehearing on the Additional Charge and specification and the penalty.