Case Name: Johnnie BAUER, Appellant, v. CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS CORP., Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-03-07
Citations: 894 S.W.2d 230
Docket Number: No. 65950
Parties: Johnnie BAUER, Appellant, v. CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS CORP., Respondent.
Judges: Before AHRENS, P.J., and SIMON and KAROHL, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 894
Pages: 230–231

Head Matter:
Johnnie BAUER, Appellant, v. CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS CORP., Respondent.
No. 65950.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
March 7, 1995.
Carla McBride, Kessler & Kessler, Timothy G. Noble, City Counselor, St. Louis, for appellant.
David Ivor Hares, Clayton, for respondent.
Before AHRENS, P.J., and SIMON and KAROHL, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Employee, Johnnie Bauer, appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's decision denying his motion to modify his workers' compensation award against employer, Consolidated Freightways Corporation.
Employee's brief does not contain a jurisdictional statement or a statement of facts. Further, employee's points relied on do not state wherein and why the Commission erred in rendering its decision. Thus, employee's brief fails to comply with the requirements of Rule 84.04.
However, in the interests of judicial economy, we have been able to glean from the record and the briefs the issues attempted to be raised, and we find the Commission's decision was not erroneous. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our holding.
We affirm the Commission's decision pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).