Case Name: ERIC MUELBERGER, RELATOR, v. THEODORE WISLOH, BUILDING INSPECTOR OF THE TOWNSHIP OF WEEHAWKEN ET AL., RESPONDENTS
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1924-09-29
Citations: 2 N.J. Misc. 962
Docket Number: 
Parties: ERIC MUELBERGER, RELATOR, v. THEODORE WISLOH, BUILDING INSPECTOR OF THE TOWNSHIP OF WEEHAWKEN ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 2
Pages: 962–963

Head Matter:
ERIC MUELBERGER, RELATOR, v. THEODORE WISLOH, BUILDING INSPECTOR OF THE TOWNSHIP OF WEEHAWKEN ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Argued May 7, 1924
Decided September 29, 1924
Filed October 7, 1924.
Ordinances — Zoning—Application for Writ Not in Good Faith and Relator Not Owner, of Lands — Writ Denied.
On rule to show cause for mandamus.
Before Justices Kalis oh, Black and Campbell.
Eor the relator, Pierson & Schroeder.
For the respondent, William S. Stuhr.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This is upon a rule to show cause why a mandamus should not issue directing respondents to issue a building permit to relator to erect-an apartment-house in a prohibited zone established by the zoning ordinance of the township of Weehawken.
Several reasons are assigned and strenuously urged why the writ applied for should be awarded.
Aii examination of the case brings us. to tlie conclusion that the application is not made in good faith, and, furthermore, that relator, if not the owner of all the lands required for the erection of tlie proposed building, and for that reason a moot question only is presented.
The application for tlie writ of mandamus is denied and the rule to show causo dismissed, with costs.