Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marie Lucie TONDREAU, a.k.a. Lucie Tondreau, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-09-27
Citations: 669 F. App'x 528
Docket Number: No. 15-11484 Non-Argument Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marie Lucie TONDREAU, a.k.a. Lucie Tondreau, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before HULL and MARTIN, Circuit Judges, and WRIGHT, District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 669
Pages: 528–529

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marie Lucie TONDREAU, a.k.a. Lucie Tondreau, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-11484 Non-Argument Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Filed: 09/27/2016
Gera R. Peoples, Wifredo A. Ferrer, Lois A. Foster-Steers, Daniel Matzkin, Kathleen Mary Salyer, Emily M. Smachet-ti, Arimentha R. Walkins, U.S. Attorney’s Office, MIAMI, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Benedict P. Kuehne, Michael Terrell Davis, Law Office of Benedict P. Kuehne, PA, MIAMI, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before HULL and MARTIN, Circuit Judges, and WRIGHT, District Judge.
Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Marie Lucie Tondreau appeals her convictions and sentences for one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349, and four counts of wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1342 and 1343. Regarding her conviction, Tondreau argues that the district court erred in denying her motions for judgment of acquittal and that the district court committed cumulative evidentiary errors, warranting reversal. As to her sentence, Tondreau contends that the district court erred in imposing a two-level mass-marketing enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2Bl.l(b)(2)(A)(ii) and erred in declining to apply a two-point downward adjustment under § 3B1.2 for a minor role in the offense. After review and oral argument, we find no reversible error.
AFFIRMED.