Case Name: David ARDREY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-05-07
Citations: 75 S.W.3d 290
Docket Number: No. ED 79838
Parties: David ARDREY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before JAMES R. DOWD, P.J. and PAUL J. SIMON and MARY K. HOFF, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 75
Pages: 290–290

Head Matter:
David ARDREY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 79838.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
May 7, 2002.
Mark A. Grothoff, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Joel A. Block, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before JAMES R. DOWD, P.J. and PAUL J. SIMON and MARY K. HOFF, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
David Ardrey, movant, appeals the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. On appeal, mov-ant contends that the motion court erred in denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief because this violated his due process and equal protection rights in that he was convicted and sentenced to "a form of armed criminal action alleging the use of a dangerous instrument, which was materially in variance with the form of armed criminal action alleging the use of a deadly weapon of which [movant] had been charged."
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file and the record on appeal and no error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no prece-dential or jurisprudential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).