Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Scott Edward BROWN, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-03-21
Citations: 18 S.W.3d 34
Docket Number: No. ED 75803
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Scott Edward BROWN, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before CRANE, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., J., and SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 18
Pages: 34–34

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Scott Edward BROWN, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 75803.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
March 21, 2000.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 10, 2000.
Application for Transfer Denied June 27, 2000.
Ellen H. Flottman, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Stacy L. Anderson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for Respondent.
Before CRANE, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., J., and SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Scott Edward Brown ("Defendant") appeals from a judgment of conviction of Murder in the First Degree, in violation of Section 565.020 RSMo (1994). Defendant alleges trial court error in overruling Defendant's Motion for Judgment of Acquittal. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude there is sufficient evidence from which a reasonable trier of fact might have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Shinn, 921 S.W.2d 70, 72-73 (Mo.App. E.D.1996). Am extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).