Case Name: Morris SPEIGHT-BEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles WILLIAMS, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-10-21
Citations: 670 F. App'x 77
Docket Number: No. 16-6895
Parties: Morris SPEIGHT-BEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles WILLIAMS, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 670
Pages: 77–78

Head Matter:
Morris SPEIGHT-BEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles WILLIAMS, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 16-6895
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: October 18, 2016
Decided: October 21, 2016
Morris Speight-Bey, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Morris Speight-Bey appeals the district court's order dismissing his original 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition and opening a new case with his refiled § 2241 petition, which remains pending below. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Speight-Bey v. Williams, No. 3:16-cv-00069-GMG-MJA (N.D. W. Va. June 16, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED