Case Name: THE STATE v. FLOYD; THE STATE v. CAMPUZANO; THE STATE v. CHARLES; THE STATE v. RUSSELL; THE STATE v. HEWITT; THE STATE v. PALMER; THE STATE v. BUSH; THE STATE v. LOWE et al.; THE STATE v. GORDON
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1982-04-28
Citations: 162 Ga. App. 291
Docket Number: 63621; 63622; 63623; 63624; 63625; 63626; 63627; 63628; 63629
Parties: THE STATE v. FLOYD. THE STATE v. CAMPUZANO. THE STATE v. CHARLES. THE STATE v. RUSSELL. THE STATE v. HEWITT. THE STATE v. PALMER. THE STATE v. BUSH. THE STATE v. LOWE et al. THE STATE v. GORDON.
Judges: Sognier and Pope, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 162
Pages: 291–292

Head Matter:
63621.
63622.
63623.
63624.
63625.
63626.
63627.
63628.
63629.
THE STATE v. FLOYD. THE STATE v. CAMPUZANO. THE STATE v. CHARLES. THE STATE v. RUSSELL. THE STATE v. HEWITT. THE STATE v. PALMER. THE STATE v. BUSH. THE STATE v. LOWE et al. THE STATE v. GORDON.

Opinion:
Deen, Presiding Judge.
The appellees in the above cases all filed a document entitled "Demand for Copy of Accusation (Indictment) etc.," that is identical with that filed in State v. Adamczyk, 162 Ga. App. 288 (290 SE2d 149) (1982) and moved for judgments of acquittal pursuant to Code § 27-1901 at the July 1981 term of court claiming that the cases had not been tried within the next succeeding term of court after a demand for trial had been filed. The trial court granted the motions, but we reverse relying on this court's full bench decision in State v. Adamczyk, supra.
Decided April 28, 1982.
Beverly B. Hayes, District Attorney, H. Jeff Lanier, Assistant District Attorney, for appellant.
W. W. Larsen, for appellees.
Judgment reversed.
Sognier and Pope, JJ., concur.