Case Name: Joseph C. Braelow et al., complainants, v. Louis Schlesinger, Incorporated, defendant-appellant; Feist & Feist, Incorporated, defendant-respondent
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1933-01-05
Citations: 112 N.J. Eq. 88
Docket Number: 
Parties: Joseph C. Braelow et al., complainants, v. Louis Schlesinger, Incorporated, defendant-appellant; Feist & Feist, Incorporated, defendant-respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 112
Pages: 88–88

Head Matter:
Joseph C. Braelow et al., complainants, v. Louis Schlesinger, Incorporated, defendant-appellant; Feist & Feist, Incorporated, defendant-respondent.
[Decided January 5th, 1933.]
Mr. Jacob L. Newman {Mr. Lionel P. Kristeller and Mr. Saul J. Zuclcer, of counsel), for the appellant.
Mr. Philip J. Schotland, for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree in the event below will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Church, and reported in 109 N. J. Eq. 472.
We have noticed a slight misstatement of fact in the opinion which does not at all affect the result.
For affirmance — -The Chancellor, Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Brogan, Heher, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 16.
For reversal — None.