Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis Martin MIRANDA-BUERAS, a.k.a. Luis Bueras-Miranda, a.k.a. Luis Miranda-Bueras, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-02-14
Citations: 677 F. App'x 347
Docket Number: No. 16-10027
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis Martin MIRANDA-BUERAS, a.k.a. Luis Bueras-Miranda, a.k.a. Luis Miranda-Bueras, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 677
Pages: 347–347

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis Martin MIRANDA-BUERAS, a.k.a. Luis Bueras-Miranda, a.k.a. Luis Miranda-Bueras, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-10027
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted February 10, 2017
Filed February 14, 2017
Christina Marie Cabanillas, Assistant U.S. Attorney, USTU—Office of the US Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee
Luis Martin Miranda-Bueras, Pro Se
Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Luis Martin Miranda-Bueras appeals from the district court's judgment and challenges his conviction and 25-month sentence for possession with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(D). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Miranda-Bu-eras's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Miranda-Bueras the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Miranda-Bueras has waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Because the record discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the appeal waiver, we dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009).
Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.