Case Name: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. FRANK MIHM, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1915-06-14
Citations: 87 N.J.L. 332
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. FRANK MIHM, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 87
Pages: 332–333

Head Matter:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. FRANK MIHM, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Argued November 17, 1914—
Decided June 14, 1915.
On error to the Supreme Court, in which court the following per curiam was filed:
“Per curiam—The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion in State v. Sutton just decided.” 86 N. J. L. 46.
For the plaintiff in error, William D. Edwards and Frank Bergen.
For the defendant in error, John Bentley, John Milton, John W. Wescott, attorney-general, Herbert Boggs, assistant attorney-general.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed upon the opinion filed in the case of State v. Sutton, ante p. 192.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Trencitaed, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoh, Black, Vredenbuegh, White, Teehune, Williams, JJ. 13.
For reversal—None.