Case Name: Michael McEVILY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer KEATON; Officer Humphries; Jane Doe, a/k/a Miss Sue, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-03-30
Citations: 11 F. App'x 78
Docket Number: No. 01-6241
Parties: Michael McEVILY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer KEATON; Officer Humphries; Jane Doe, a/k/a Miss Sue, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 11
Pages: 78–78

Head Matter:
Michael McEVILY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer KEATON; Officer Humphries; Jane Doe, a/k/a Miss Sue, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 01-6241.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 22, 2001.
Decided March 30, 2001.
Michael McEvily, pro se.
Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Michael McEvily appeals from a district court order dismissing without prejudice his complaint alleging civil rights violations under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West 1994 & Supp.2000). The court dismissed McEvily's complaint because he failed to pay his filing fee as directed or properly certify that he could not pay such a fee and sign the consent form for withdrawal of the fee in installments from his prison account. Because McEvily may proceed with this action in the district court by amending his complaint to provide the information requested by the court, his appeal is interlocutory and not subject to appellate review. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir.1993).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.