Case Name: HUGO ROSEBERG ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. AMERICAN HOTEL AND GARDEN COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1926-03-18
Citations: 4 N.J. Misc. 324
Docket Number: 
Parties: HUGO ROSEBERG ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. AMERICAN HOTEL AND GARDEN COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 4
Pages: 324–324

Head Matter:
HUGO ROSEBERG ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. AMERICAN HOTEL AND GARDEN COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Argued October term, 1925
Decided March 18, 1926.
Before Justices Parker, Minturn and Black.
For the motion, John C. Reed and Clarence L. Cole.
Contra, William Elmer Broiun, Jr., and Emerson L. Richards.

Opinion:
Per Guriam.
Our examination of the record in this case leads us to conclude that therp is no merit in the motion, except in so far as the identity of some of the counts is concerned. Counts three and five are practically identical with counts one and two, and should be consolidated or struck out to avoid prolixity in pleading. Otherwise the motion to strike out will be denied.