Case Name: John STEELMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Matthew CATE; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-03-08
Citations: 370 F. App'x 788
Docket Number: No. 08-56770
Parties: John STEELMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Matthew CATE; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 370
Pages: 788–789

Head Matter:
John STEELMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Matthew CATE; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 08-56770.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 16, 2010.
Filed March 8, 2010.
Before: FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
John Steelman, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court's order denying his request to proceed without prepayment of filing fees. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion, Tripati v. First Nat'l Bank & Trust, 821 F.2d 1368, 1369 (9th Cir.1987), and we affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Steelman's request to proceed without prepayment of filing fees because the claims in the complaint were based only on "contingent future events that may not occur as anticipated, or indeed may not occur at all," and therefore were not ripe. Scott v. Pasadena Unified Sch. Dist., 306 F.3d 646, 662 (9th Cir.2002) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted); see also Tripati, 821 F.2d at 1370 ("A district court may deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis at the outset if it appears from the face of the proposed complaint that the action is frivolous or without merit.").
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.