Case Name: TROUNG, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1985-12-26
Citations: 77 Or. App. 188
Docket Number: 85-AB-235-A; A35777
Parties: TROUNG, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION, Respondent.
Judges: Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Van Hoomissen and Young, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 77
Pages: 188–189

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted December 13,
affirmed December 26, 1985
TROUNG, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION, Respondent.
(85-AB-235-A; A35777)
711 P2d 224
Helen D. Moorman, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.
Linda DeVries Grimms, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and James E. Mountain, Jr., Solicitor General, Salem.
Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Van Hoomissen and Young, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Petitioner was disqualified from receiving unemployment compensation benefits under Employment Division Rules OAR 471-30-036(2) and (3), because he was not medically able to work more than four hours a day. He seeks judicial review. He does not deny that the rules, if valid, require his disqualification. Rather, he argues that the rules exceed the scope of the Division's authority to promulgate. They do not. See Doctor v. Employment Division, 76 Or App 650, 711 P2d 159 (1985); Minton v. Employment Division, 57 Or App 348, 644 P2d 632 (1982).
Affirmed.