Case Name: Smith et al., Appellants, v. Rudler, Appellee
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1994-09-28
Citations: 70 Ohio St. 3d 397
Docket Number: No. 93-2055
Parties: Smith et al., Appellants, v. Rudler, Appellee.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 70
Pages: 397–398

Head Matter:
Smith et al., Appellants, v. Rudler, Appellee.
[Cite as Smith v. Rudler (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 397.]
(No. 93-2055
Submitted August 31, 1994
Decided September 28, 1994.)
Yulish, Twohig & Associates Co., L.P.A., and Jeffrey S. Watson, for appellants.
Bobulsky & Grdina and Timothy J. Bohanowski, for appellee.
Licata & Crosby Co., L.P.A., Louis J. Licata and Elizabeth A. Crosby, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Adult Support for Incest Survivors of Today.

Opinion:
The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for consideration and application of Ault v. Jasko (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 114, 637 N.E.2d 870.
Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Wright, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Ault v. Jasko (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 114, 637 N.E.2d 870.