Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cipriano TOYOS-CORDOVA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-07-03
Citations: 284 F. App'x 480
Docket Number: No. 07-10300
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cipriano TOYOS-CORDOVA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: THOMAS, W. FLETCHER and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 284
Pages: 480–480

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cipriano TOYOS-CORDOVA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-10300.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 18, 2008.
Filed July 3, 2008.
Jerry R. Albert, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Thomas F. Jacobs, Esq., Law Offices of Thomas Jacobs, Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: THOMAS, W. FLETCHER and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Cipriano Toyos-Cordova appeals from the 63-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(l)(B)(vii). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Toyos-Cordova contends that the district court gave undue weight to the Sentencing Guidelines, failed to consider mitigating factors when imposing the sentence, and failed to adequately explain its reasons for the sentence. We conclude that there was no procedural error and that the sentence imposed is substantively reasonable. See Gall v. United States, — U.S.-, 128 S.Ct. 586, 597, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 995-96 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.