Case Name: Kenneth SPLITT, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Loan SPLITT, Respondent/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2010-09-07
Citations: 320 S.W.3d 208
Docket Number: No. ED 93642
Parties: Kenneth SPLITT, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Loan SPLITT, Respondent/Appellant.
Judges: Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 320
Pages: 208–209

Head Matter:
Kenneth SPLITT, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Loan SPLITT, Respondent/Appellant.
No. ED 93642.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Sept. 7, 2010.
Jane E. Tomich, St. Charles, MO, for Appellant.
John T. Bruere, Jennifer Growe Sosh-nik, Troy, MO, for Respondent.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Loan Splitt appeals from the trial court's Judgment and Decree of Dissolution of Marriage (judgment) dissolving her marriage to Kenneth Splitt. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the judgment is not against the weight of the evidence, Walsh v. Walsh, 184 S.W.3d 156, 157 (Mo.App. E.D.2006), and the trial court did not abuse its discretion in identifying and dividing the parties' marital property. Pruitt v. Pruitt, 94 S.W.3d 429, 433-34 (Mo.App. E.D.2003). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).