Case Name: Sydne BROWN, Claimant/Appellant, v. FAMOUS BARR, Employer/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-10-30
Citations: 59 S.W.3d 541
Docket Number: No. ED 79198
Parties: cSydne BROWN, Claimant/Appellant, v. FAMOUS BARR, Employer/Respondent.
Judges: Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 59
Pages: 541–541

Head Matter:
cSydne BROWN, Claimant/Appellant, v. FAMOUS BARR, Employer/Respondent.
No. ED 79198.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Oct. 30, 2001.
Jerome T. Bollato c/o Richard Baugh, Law Firm of Bartley, Goffstein, Bollato & Lange, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Mark R. Bates, Law Firm of Boggs & Backer & Bates, Clayton, MO, for Respondent.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Sydne Brown appeals from a Final Award Allowing Compensation (Final Award) of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) modifying the Award and Decision of the Administrative Law Judge as to the percentage of permanent partial disability awarded. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the Commission's Final Award is supported by competent and substantial evidence and is not clearly contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence. Landers v. Chrysler Corp., 963 S.W.2d 275, 279 (Mo.App. E.D.1997). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of J . Civil Procedure 84.16(b).