Case Name: Stephen W. STONE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SENECA SOUTH CAROLINA, CITY OF, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-05-12
Citations: 378 F. App'x 356
Docket Number: No. 09-1693
Parties: Stephen W. STONE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SENECA SOUTH CAROLINA, CITY OF, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 378
Pages: 356–357

Head Matter:
Stephen W. STONE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SENECA SOUTH CAROLINA, CITY OF, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 09-1693.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 22, 2010.
Decided: May 12, 2010.
Mary C. McCormac, Clemson, South Carolina, for Appellant. Vance J. Bettis, Gignilliat, Savitz & Bettis, L.L.P., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Stephen W. Stone appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of the City of Seneca on all of Stone's claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stone v. City of Seneca, South Carolina, No. 8:07-cv-03401-HFF (D.S.C. May 14, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.