Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Patrick Lewis RUDD, a/k/a Louie, a/k/a One-Eyed Louie, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-08-08
Citations: 285 F. App'x 992
Docket Number: No. 08-6484
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Patrick Lewis RUDD, a/k/a Louie, a/k/a One-Eyed Louie, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 285
Pages: 992–992

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Patrick Lewis RUDD, a/k/a Louie, a/k/a One-Eyed Louie, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-6484.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 31, 2008.
Decided: Aug. 8, 2008.
Patrick Lewis Rudd, Appellant Pro Se. J. Frank Bradsher, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Patrick Lewis Rudd appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for relief pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b), in which he sought to receive credit on his federal sentence for time served in state custody before his federal conviction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Rudd, No. 7:97-cr-00063-H-3 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 3, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.