Case Name: Ong Sing, Resp't, v. Hom Mon Dus, Impleaded, etc., App'lt
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1893
Citations: 56 N.Y. St. Rep. 884
Docket Number: 
Parties: Ong Sing, Resp’t, v. Hom Mon Dus, Impleaded, etc., App’lt.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 56
Pages: 884–884

Head Matter:
Ong Sing, Resp’t, v. Hom Mon Dus, Impleaded, etc., App’lt.
W. G. Beecher, for app’lt; H. M. Hermann, for resp’t.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The fact that the money was loaned gives no ground of arrest. The only ground upon which this order of arrest can be sustained is that the defendant has fraudulently disposed of his property with intent to defraud his creditors. Tho allegations in the affidavits wholly fail to set up any facts from which any such conclusion can be drawn, and are therefore wholly insufficient. The order should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs.