Case Name: C. W. FOX, Respondent, v. BARSTOW & GOODMAN, Appellants
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada
Jurisdiction: Nevada
Decision Date: 1865
Citations: 1 Nev. 612
Docket Number: 
Parties: C. W. FOX, Respondent, v. BARSTOW & GOODRMAN, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Nevada Reports
Volume: 1
Pages: 612–612

Head Matter:
C. W. FOX, Respondent, v. BARSTOW & GOODRMAN, Appellants.
Appeal from tbe District Court of tbe First Judicial District, State of Nevada, Storey County, Hon. Richard Rising presiding.

Opinion:
Opinion by
Beatty, J.,
Justice Beosnan concurring.
Tbe only question in tbis case is, can tbe Courts of tbis State enter up a judgment against a defendant, requiring bim to satisfy tbe same by the payment of gold coin.
We have fully settled this question in the case of Milliken Brothers v. Charles O. Sloat. Upon tbe authority of that case tbe Court below is directed to modify tbe judgment in tbis case, by striking out all that part of it which relates to tbe payment of gold coin.
The appellants must have their judgment for costs in tbis Court, and it is so ordered.