Case Name: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Williams
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1990-05-09
Citations: 51 Ohio St. 3d 36
Docket Number: No. 89-2171
Parties: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Williams.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 51
Pages: 36–37

Head Matter:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Williams.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Williams (1990), 51 Ohio St. 3d 36.]
(No. 89-2171
Submitted February 13, 1990
Decided May 9, 1990.)
J. Warren Bettis, disciplinary counsel, and Mark H. Aultman, for relator.
Charles W. Kettlewell, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we agree with the-board's findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded for having violated DR 5-103(A), 5-107(A)(l), and 1-102(A)(5). Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.