Case Name: In the Matter of the Estate of JOHN HARVEY, Deceased. PERCY M. BOKOFSKY, Appellant, v. BEN H. BROWN, Public Administrator, etc., Respondent
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1938-06-10
Citations: 27 Cal. App. 2d 86
Docket Number: Civ. No. 11873
Parties: In the Matter of the Estate of JOHN HARVEY, Deceased. PERCY M. BOKOFSKY, Appellant, v. BEN H. BROWN, Public Administrator, etc., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports, Second Series
Volume: 27
Pages: 86–87

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 11873.
Second Appellate District, Division Two.
June 10, 1938.]
In the Matter of the Estate of JOHN HARVEY, Deceased. PERCY M. BOKOFSKY, Appellant, v. BEN H. BROWN, Public Administrator, etc., Respondent.
David I. Lippert for Appellant.
Marshall Stimson and Noel Edwards, as Amici Curiae, on Behalf of Appellant.
Everett W. Mattoon, County Counsel, and Ernest Purdum, Deputy County Counsel, for Respondent.

Opinion:
WOOD, J.
In this proceeding Percy M. Bokofsky appeals from an order of the superior court denying his petition for letters of administration with the will annexed and granting the petition of the public administrator of Los Angeles County. The bank named as executor declined to act. Appellant is the nominee of Susan Watts, surviving sister of the decedent and a beneficiary under the will, who resides in the state of Wisconsin.
Appellant contends that it was mandatory upon the probate court to appoint the nominee of the nonresident sister of the decedent. The issue involved has been decided ad versely to appellant's contention in Estate of Pardue, 22 Cal. App. (2d) 178 [70 Pac. (2d) 678], wherein the identical question was presented for determination and the court held: "It is evident that being a nonresident, and not being a surviving spouse, Carrie Phillips ' request for the appointment of Marshall Stimson as administrator created no priority right and was not binding on the court." A petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied in the Pardue case. On the authority of that decision the order appealed from must be affirmed.
It is so ordered.
Grail, P. J., and McComb, J., concurred.
A petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on August 8, 1938.