Case Name: HAYTON v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1953-04-15
Citations: 256 S.W.2d 853
Docket Number: No. 26377
Parties: HAYTON v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 256
Pages: 853–853

Head Matter:
HAYTON v. STATE.
No. 26377.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
April 15, 1953.
No attorney on appeal.
■ Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
MORRISON, Judge.
The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, a fine of $50.
The statement of facts is approved by appellant's counsel only. This is not sufficient. Article 759a, Vernon's Ann. C.C.P.
If the instrument appearing in the record signed by the trial judge and the county attorney may be considered as an approval of the statement of facts, such ap-prov.al was long after the 90 days allowed for filing the statement of facts and cannot be considered. .
No formal bills of exception appear in the record.
The proceedings appearing regular, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.