Case Name: In re ESTATE OF Elsie Elliott RYAN, Deceased. Juan Carlos NIETO and Elia E. Nieto, Appellants, v. Sheila R. WELLS, Lynn Elliott Barth and Charles P. Sacher, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-02-26
Citations: 576 So. 2d 767
Docket Number: No. 90-1473
Parties: In re ESTATE OF Elsie Elliott RYAN, Deceased. Juan Carlos NIETO and Elia E. Nieto, Appellants, v. Sheila R. WELLS, Lynn Elliott Barth and Charles P. Sacher, Appellees.
Judges: Before FERGUSON, COPE and GODERICH, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 576
Pages: 767–768

Head Matter:
In re ESTATE OF Elsie Elliott RYAN, Deceased. Juan Carlos NIETO and Elia E. Nieto, Appellants, v. Sheila R. WELLS, Lynn Elliott Barth and Charles P. Sacher, Appellees.
No. 90-1473.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 26, 1991.
Rehearing Denied April 12, 1991.
Roy R. Lustig and Sheryl J. Lowenthal, Coral Gables, for appellants.
Walton, Lantaff, Schroeder & Carson and G. Bart Billbrough, Miami, for appel-lees.
Before FERGUSON, COPE and GODERICH, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellants appeal the trial court's denial of a petition for administration of a will. We affirm.
We have carefully considered each of appellants' points on appeal. Construing the record as a whole, we conclude there was competent substantial evidence to support the trial court's finding that the will was procured by undue influence and that the testator, Elsie Elliott Ryan, lacked testamentary capacity when the will was executed. It is not this court's function to reweigh the evidence and we must give all deference to the trial court's decision. See Sun Bank/Miami, N.A. v. Hogarth, 536 So.2d 263, 267 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), review denied 545 So.2d 1369 (Fla.1989); Elson v. Vargas, 520 So.2d 76, 78 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied 528 So.2d 1181 (Fla.1988); Sacchetti v. McDermott, 538 So.2d 127 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).