Case Name: Jessie C. SCOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-08-28
Citations: 235 F. App'x 80
Docket Number: No. 07-6361
Parties: Jessie C. SCOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 235
Pages: 80–80

Head Matter:
Jessie C. SCOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 07-6361.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 23, 2007.
Decided: Aug. 28, 2007.
Jessie C. Scott, Appellant Pro Se. John Walter Sippel, Jr., Ariana Wright Arnold, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Jessie C. Scott appeals the district court's order denying his Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(g) motion to return property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Scott v. United States, No. 8:06-cv-02777-PJM (D.Md. filed Feb. 23, 2007 & entered Feb. 26, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.