Case Name: Smith v. Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1904-12-31
Citations: 210 Pa. 349
Docket Number: No. 2; Appeal, No. 138
Parties: Smith v. Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company, Appellant
Judges: Before Mitchell, C. J., Dean, Fell, Brown, Potter and Thompson, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 210
Pages: 349–349

Head Matter:
Smith v. Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company, Appellant
(No. 2).
Argued Oct. 28, 1904.
Appeal, No. 138, Oct. T., 1904, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 3, Allegheny Co., Nov. T., 1902, No. 608, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Charles F. Smith v. Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company.
Before Mitchell, C. J., Dean, Fell, Brown, Potter and Thompson, JJ.
Affirmed.
December 31, 1904 :

Opinion:
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Fell,
This action is by a father to recover for injuries sustained by his son, a minor, and involves the same questions that have been considered in Smith v. Pittsburg, etc., Railway Co., 210 Pa. 345. For the reasons stated in the opinion filed in that case the judgment is affirmed.