Case Name: UNITED FARM AGENCY OF FLORIDA, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. DKLS, INC., a dissolved Florida corporation, Herbert H. Cameron as Trustee for DKLS, Inc., a dissolved Florida corporation, and Herbert H. Cameron, individually, Citizens and Southern Bank of Monroe County, and Sheriff of Monroe County, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-09-17
Citations: 585 So. 2d 1139
Docket Number: No. 91-1277
Parties: UNITED FARM AGENCY OF FLORIDA, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. DKLS, INC., a dissolved Florida corporation, Herbert H. Cameron as Trustee for DKLS, Inc., a dissolved Florida corporation, and Herbert H. Cameron, individually, Citizens and Southern Bank of Monroe County, and Sheriff of Monroe County, Appellees.
Judges: Before BASKIN, JORGENSON, and GODERICH, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 585
Pages: 1139–1140

Head Matter:
UNITED FARM AGENCY OF FLORIDA, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. DKLS, INC., a dissolved Florida corporation, Herbert H. Cameron as Trustee for DKLS, Inc., a dissolved Florida corporation, and Herbert H. Cameron, individually, Citizens and Southern Bank of Monroe County, and Sheriff of Monroe County, Appellees.
No. 91-1277.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Sept. 17, 1991.
Gillette, Richman & Kowalski, P.A., and Frank X. Kowalski, Jr., Naples, for appellant.
Beckmeyer & Mulick and Karl Beckmeyer, Tavernier, for appellee Citizens and Southern Bank of Monroe County.
Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith & Cutler, P.A., Alan C. Sundberg and R. Vincent Russon, Jr., Tallahassee, for appel-lee Cameron.
Before BASKIN, JORGENSON, and GODERICH, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
United Farm Agency of Florida, Inc., appeals from a final order invalidating an attempted levy that was based on a judgment for brokerage fees. We affirm.
Although we sympathize with United Farm's plight, we agree with the trial court's ruling that the proper means of executing a judgment is to institute proceedings supplementary. See § 56.29, Fla. Stat. (1989). Proceedings supplementary to execution are the intended means for a judgment creditor to receive satisfaction of a judgment. See Advertects, Inc. v. Sawyer Indus., 84 So.2d 21 (Fla.1956).
Therefore, we affirm without prejudice to United Farm to bring proceedings supplementary to execution.