Case Name: In the Matter of Jose A. Fuentes, Appellant, v. Brian Fischer, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2011-11-23
Citations: 89 A.D.3d 1339
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Jose A. Fuentes, Appellant, v Brian Fischer, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 89
Pages: 1339–1340

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Jose A. Fuentes, Appellant, v Brian Fischer, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.
[934 NYS2d 520]

Opinion:
After petitioner, a prison inmate, forwarded a handwritten document to the law library with the request that it be typed, the document was determined to be a redemption document and petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with unauthorized possession of a Uniform Commercial Code document. He was found guilty of that charge following a tier III disciplinary hearing and that determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. Thereafter, he commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding and Supreme Court dismissed the petition. Petitioner now appeals.
We affirm. To the extent that petitioner challenges the determination based upon substantial evidence, the misbehavior report, copies of the documents and petitioner's admissions during the hearing provide the quantum of proof necessary to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Bunting v Fischer, 85 AD3d 1473, 1474 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 712 [2011]; Matter of Samuels v Department of Correctional Servs. Staff, 84 AD3d 1629, 1630 [2011]). Petitioner's remaining claims are ei ther unpreserved for this Court's review by his failure to raise them during the disciplinary hearing (see Matter of Vidal-Ortiz v Fischer, 84 AD3d 1627, 1628 [2011]; Matter of Abreu v Fischer, 83 AD3d 1348, 1348-1349 [2011]) or have been examined and found to be without merit.
Mercure, J.E, Rose, Malone Jr., Kavanagh and McCarthy, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.