Case Name: GRANITE ROCK COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, FREIGHT, CONSTRUCTION, GENERAL DRIVERS, WAREHOUSEMEN & HELPERS, LOCAL 287 (AFL-CIO) and International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-05-20
Citations: 645 F.3d 1096
Docket Number: No. 07-15040
Parties: GRANITE ROCK COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, FREIGHT, CONSTRUCTION, GENERAL DRIVERS, WAREHOUSEMEN & HELPERS, LOCAL 287 (AFL-CIO) and International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: RONALD M. GOULD and CARLOS T. BEA, Circuit Judges, and JOHN W. SEDWICK, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 645
Pages: 1096–1096

Head Matter:
GRANITE ROCK COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, FREIGHT, CONSTRUCTION, GENERAL DRIVERS, WAREHOUSEMEN & HELPERS, LOCAL 287 (AFL-CIO) and International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 07-15040.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 20, 2011.
Alan S. Levins, Esq., Garry G. Mathiason, Esq., Adam J. Peters, Esq., Kimberly L. Owens, Esq., Littler Mendelson, PC, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Duane B. Beeson, Esq., Lisa W. Pau, Esq., Beeson Tayer & Bodine, PC, Oakland, CA, Peter D. Nussbaum, Esq., Peder J.V. Thoreen, Esq., Altshuler Berzon Nussbaum Rubin & Demain, San Francisco, CA, Leah Ford, Esq., International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before: RONALD M. GOULD and CARLOS T. BEA, Circuit Judges, and JOHN W. SEDWICK, District Judge.
The Honorable John W. Sedwick, District Judge for the U.S. District Court for Alaska, Anchorage, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
ORDER
In light of Granite Bock Co. v. Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 2847, 177 L.Ed.2d 567 (2010), which reversed the judgment of this court, 546 F.3d 1169 (2008), and remanded, we in turn remand this case to the District Court for further proceedings in accordance with the Supreme Court's decision.
REMANDED.