Case Name: HARRY HODES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. FRANK MOONEY ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1930-12-30
Citations: 9 N.J. Misc. 48
Docket Number: 
Parties: HARRY HODES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. FRANK MOONEY ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 9
Pages: 48–48

Head Matter:
HARRY HODES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. FRANK MOONEY ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Decided December 30, 1930.
Before Justices Case, Daly and Donges..
Eor the appellant, Hodes £ Hodes, Herbert A. Kuvin and Harry Green.
Eor the respondents, Berlin £ Berlin.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Since the filing of the opinion in this case it has been represented to the court that the defendant Mooney has parted with the property so that a judgment for possession will be ineffectual. Therefore, instead of entering judgment for the plaintiff in this court, the judgment is reversed and the case remanded for a new trial.