Case Name: Steven BURKE, Appellant, v. DADE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida and Arthur Joseph Tauriac, individually, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1980-12-02
Citations: 390 So. 2d 797
Docket Number: No. 80-338
Parties: Steven BURKE, Appellant, v. DADE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida and Arthur Joseph Tauriac, individually, Appellees.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and BASKIN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 390
Pages: 797–797

Head Matter:
Steven BURKE, Appellant, v. DADE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida and Arthur Joseph Tauriac, individually, Appellees.
No. 80-338.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 2, 1980.
Colson & Hicks and Bill. Hoppe, Miami, for appellant.
Robert A. Ginsburg, County Atty., and Robert L. Blake, Asst. County Atty., for appellees.
Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and BASKIN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court's refusal to instruct the jury regarding a statute not brought into issue by the evidence: Testimony established that the vehicle in question was stopped for traffic, rather than for the pedestrian (plaintiff). But see § 316.-130, Fla.Stat. (1977).
We similarly affirm the court's denial of plaintiff's motion for directed verdict. See Stresscon International, Inc. v. Helms, 390 So.2d 139 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).
Affirmed.