Case Name: THE ACQUACKANONK WATER COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. NATIONAL SILK DYEING COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1923-03-13
Citations: 1 N.J. Misc. 103
Docket Number: 
Parties: THE ACQUACKANONK WATER COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. NATIONAL SILK DYEING COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 1
Pages: 103–103

Head Matter:
THE ACQUACKANONK WATER COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. NATIONAL SILK DYEING COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Argued November 9 and 10, 1922
Decided March 13, 1923.
On appeal from the Passaic Circuit Court.
Before Justices Kalisch, Black and Katzenbach.
For the appellant, Humphreys & Sumner, and William B. Gourley.
For the respondent, Griggs & Harding, and William I. Lewis.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgments in these cases, No. 25, The Acquaekanonk Water Co-, v. National Silk Dyeing Co., No. 26, The Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Jersey City v. National Silk Dyeing Co., and No. 28, The Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Jersey City v. The Weidmann Silk Dyeing Co., -will he affirmed, for the reasons expre:?sed in the opinion of No. 27, The Acquaekanonk Water Co. v. Weidmann Silk Dyeing Co.
The judgments in the Passaic Circuit Court are affirmed.