Case Name: Jimmy Dean JONES, a/k/a Jimmy D. Jones, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gary LANE; Corporal Betty Rodgers; Lieutenant Lawrence Levigne; Investigator Donald Lane, Defendants-Appellees, and Tim Riley, Warden; Tyger River Correctional Institution, et al.; Laura Caldwell; Mrs. Nancy Byrd; Disciplinary Hearing Officer R.L. Turner, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-11-22
Citations: 546 F. App'x 299
Docket Number: No. 13-7243
Parties: Jimmy Dean JONES, a/k/a Jimmy D. Jones, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gary LANE; Corporal Betty Rodgers; Lieutenant Lawrence Levigne; Investigator Donald Lane, Defendants-Appellees, and Tim Riley, Warden; Tyger River Correctional Institution, et al.; Laura Caldwell; Mrs. Nancy Byrd; Disciplinary Hearing Officer R.L. Turner, Defendants.
Judges: Before WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 546
Pages: 299–300

Head Matter:
Jimmy Dean JONES, a/k/a Jimmy D. Jones, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gary LANE; Corporal Betty Rodgers; Lieutenant Lawrence Levigne; Investigator Donald Lane, Defendants-Appellees, and Tim Riley, Warden; Tyger River Correctional Institution, et al.; Laura Caldwell; Mrs. Nancy Byrd; Disciplinary Hearing Officer R.L. Turner, Defendants.
No. 13-7243.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 19, 2013.
Decided: Nov. 22, 2013.
Jimmy D. Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Holmes Burton, GIBBES & BURTON, LLC, Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jimmy Dean Jones appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice Jones' 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. Lane, No. 1:12-cv-01033-JMC, 2013 WL 3270449 (D.S.C. June 26, 2013). We grant Jones' motion to file a supplemental informal reply brief and deny his motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.