Case Name: Arthur A. Rath, Respondent, v. Roy H. McNaught, Appellant, and Another, Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1913-07
Citations: 158 A.D. 906
Docket Number: 
Parties: Arthur A. Rath, Respondent, v. Roy H. McNaught, Appellant, and Another, Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 158
Pages: 906–906

Head Matter:
Arthur A. Rath, Respondent, v. Roy H. McNaught, Appellant, and Another, Defendant.

Opinion:
As the affidavits for the remedy by arrest made a prima facie case of actionable fraud without reference to the proceedings in the suit of Eastmond v. McNaught (ante, p. 903), the order denying, the motion to vacate the order of arrest is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to abide the event. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.