Case Name: In the Interest of S. T. P., D. K. P.
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1967-01-10
Citations: 194 So. 2d 29
Docket Number: No. 66-830
Parties: In the Interest of S. T. P., D. K. P.
Judges: Before PEARSON and CARROLL, JJ., and LOPEZ, AQUILINO, Jr., Associate Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 194
Pages: 29–29

Head Matter:
In the Interest of S. T. P., D. K. P.
No. 66-830.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
Jan. 10, 1967.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 8, 1967.
Sheldon Yavitz, Miami Beach, for appellant
Earl Faírcloth, Atty. Gen., Barry N. Semet, Asst. Atty. Gen., Stephen F. Baz-zano, Miami, for appellee.
Before PEARSON and CARROLL, JJ., and LOPEZ, AQUILINO, Jr., Associate Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellant challenges an order of the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court of Dade County, which adjudicated the designated minor children as being dependent children within the meaning of Fla. Stat. § 39.01(10), F. S. A.
On this appeal, it is first urged that the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court lacked jurisdiction because the appellant, had been granted custody of the children-by a divorce decree of the circuit court. It is apparent that this position cannot be sustained in view of the holding in. In Interest of S.L.T., Fla.App.1965, 180 So.2d 374, 376.
Appellant's remaining points on appeal' are directed to the weight and sufficiency-of the evidence. A review of the record' convinces us that no reversible error has-been shown. See Noeling v. State, Fla.1956, 87 So.2d 593; In Re C.E.S., Fla.App.1958, 106 So.2d 610.
Affirmed.