Case Name: FRANK MUZIK, RESPONDENT, v. ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1914-10-16
Citations: 86 N.J.L. 695
Docket Number: 
Parties: FRANK MUZIK, RESPONDENT, v. ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 86
Pages: 695–695

Head Matter:
FRANK MUZIK, RESPONDENT, v. ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT.
Submitted July 6, 3914
Decided October 16, 1914.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 85 N. J. L. 129.
For the respondent, Michael Dunn.
For the appellant, Collins & Corbin.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Voorhees in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Garrison, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Bogert, Terhune, Heppenheimer, Williams, JJ. 12.
For reversal — Hone.