Case Name: Ole M. HANCOCK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1964-06-12
Citations: 165 So. 2d 198
Docket Number: No. 4638
Parties: Ole M. HANCOCK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SHANNON, Acting C. J., and WHITE and ANDREWS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 165
Pages: 198–199

Head Matter:
Ole M. HANCOCK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4638.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.
June 12, 1964.
W. D. Frederick, Jr., Public Defender, and Joseph X. Dumond, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, Orlando, for appellant.
James W. Kynes, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert R. Crittenden, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The record conclusively shows that the defendant was represented by counsel at all essential steps leading to his conviction and imposition of sentence and is, therefore, not entitled to hearing under the pro vision of Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix.
Affirmed.
SHANNON, Acting C. J., and WHITE and ANDREWS, JJ., concur.