Case Name: Philip Tamburrino, Respondent, v. Jayen Building Corporation, Appellant, and Sam Shapiro and Joseph Stolman, Copartners, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Shapiro & Stolman, Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1931-06
Citations: 233 A.D. 868
Docket Number: 
Parties: Philip Tamburrino, Respondent, v. Jayen Building Corporation, Appellant, and Sam Shapiro and Joseph Stolman, Copartners, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Shapiro & Stolman, Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 233
Pages: 868–869

Head Matter:
Philip Tamburrino, Respondent, v. Jayen Building Corporation, Appellant, and Sam Shapiro and Joseph Stolman, Copartners, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Shapiro & Stolman, Defendants.
Affd., 257 N. Y. 587.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents and votes for reversal upon the ground that there is no proof in the case that the general contractor knew or had reason to know that the place where the accident happened was to be used for the purpose for which it was used.