Case Name: OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP., Relator, v. Hon. Neil CALDWELL, Judge of the 23rd District Court of Brazoria County, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Texas
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1991-06-19
Citations: 814 S.W.2d 390
Docket Number: No. D-0882
Parties: OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP., Relator, v. Hon. Neil CALDWELL, Judge of the 23rd District Court of Brazoria County, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 814
Pages: 390–390

Head Matter:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP., Relator, v. Hon. Neil CALDWELL, Judge of the 23rd District Court of Brazoria County, Respondent.
No. D-0882.
Supreme Court of Texas.
June 19, 1991.
Frank M. Bean, Kevin F. Risley, Thomas W. Taylor, Elizabeth M. Thompson, Houston, Laurence H. Tribe-Cambridge, Mass., Ruby Kless Sondock, Houston, Peter J. Rubin, Cambridge, Mass., for relator.
Lawrence Madeksho, Robert E. Ballard, Houston, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this original mandamus proceeding relator seeks review of sanctions imposed by respondents for abuse of discovery. 807 S.W.2d 413 (Tex.App.1991). We believe that the trial court should have the opportunity to reconsider the rulings of which relator complains in this proceeding in light of our opinion today in Braden v. Downey, 811 S.W.2d 922 (Tex.1991). Accordingly, we vacate our order staying proceedings and deny leave to file this petition for writ of mandamus, without addressing its merits and without prejudice to relator again requesting relief from the court of appeals and this Court after the trial court has had an opportunity to reconsider its rulings.