Case Name: Hoffman et al., Appellants, v. First National Bank of Lansford
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1921-05-26
Citations: 270 Pa. 564
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 74
Parties: Hoffman et al., Appellants, v. First National Bank of Lansford.
Judges: Before Moschzisker, C. J., Frazer, Walling, Simpson, Sadler and Schaefer, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 270
Pages: 564–564

Head Matter:
Hoffman et al., Appellants, v. First National Bank of Lansford.
Argued March 7, 1921.
Appeal, No. 74, Jan. T., 1921, by plaintiffs, from order of C. P. Carbon Co., Oct. T., 1919, No. 45, discharging rule for judgment for want of sufficient affidavit of defense, in case of Aaron Hoffman and Ida Matilda Hoffman v. First National Bank of Lansford.
Before Moschzisker, C. J., Frazer, Walling, Simpson, Sadler and Schaefer, JJ.
Affirmed.
J. O. Ulrich, for appellant.
Ben Branch, of Freyman, Thomas & Branch, for appellee.
May 26, 1921:

Opinion:
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Moschzisker,
Plaintiffs' claim rests on a failure of defendant bank to deliver certain bonds alleged to be in its custody for plaintiffs. The opinion this day filed in Parry v. First National Bank of Lansford, Pa., sufficiently disposes of all the questions here involved.
The assignments of error are overruled and the order appealed from is affirmed.