Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Terril Monteiz DUCKETT, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-09-08
Citations: 615 F. App'x 211
Docket Number: No. 15-40021
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Terril Monteiz DUCKETT, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before HIGGINBOTHAM, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 615
Pages: 211–212

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Terril Monteiz DUCKETT, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-40021
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Sept. 8, 2015.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Oscar O. Pena, Esq. Laredo, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Terril Monteiz Duckett has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Duckett has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the rec ord reflected therein, as well as Duckett s response. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no non-frivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. The motions made by Duckett in his response are DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir.1998).
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.