Case Name: N. O. P. & L. v. PENN. R. R. CO.
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1926-08-06
Citations: 4 Ohio Law Abs. 740
Docket Number: No. 20050
Parties: N. O. P. & L. v. PENN. R. R. CO.
Judges: 
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 4
Pages: 740–740

Head Matter:
N. O. P. & L. v. PENN. R. R. CO.
No. 20050.
Supreme Court
Dock. Aug. 6, 1926;
4 Abs. 541.
Attorneys — Mather, Nesbitt & Wilkie for Company; Waters, Andress, Southworth, Wise & Maxon for R. R. Co.; all of Akron.

Opinion:
Penn. R. R. Co. contend in the Supreme Court that a contract by which a steam railroad grants to an electric railroad the right to construct crossovers upon their right of way within a city, provided they pay one-half the expense of maintenance, is founded upon sufficient consideration, although electric line previously had a franchise from the city to do so.