Case Name: Jeffrey T. LAWSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EMPLOYEES OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; V.S. Gray; O. Chambers; Gail Jones; Ms. Matthews; Mrs. Foster, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-10-22
Citations: 334 F. App'x 542
Docket Number: No. 09-7628
Parties: Jeffrey T. LAWSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EMPLOYEES OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; V.S. Gray; O. Chambers; Gail Jones; Ms. Matthews; Mrs. Foster, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 334
Pages: 542–542

Head Matter:
Jeffrey T. LAWSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EMPLOYEES OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; V.S. Gray; O. Chambers; Gail Jones; Ms. Matthews; Mrs. Foster, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 09-7628.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 15, 2009.
Decided: Oct. 22, 2009.
Jeffrey T. Lawson, Appellant Pro Se.
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding-precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jeffrey T. Lawson appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Lawson v. Employees of Virginia Dep't of Corr., No. 7:09-cv-00258-jct-mfu, 2009 WL 2643151 (W.D.Va. Aug. 26, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.