Case Name: Dan ROTTA, Appellant, v. Renee ROTTA, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2011-08-03
Citations: 99 So. 3d 529
Docket Number: No. 3D10-2982
Parties: Dan ROTTA, Appellant, v. Renee ROTTA, Appellee.
Judges: Before ROTHENBERG and LAGOA, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 99
Pages: 529–533

Head Matter:
Dan ROTTA, Appellant, v. Renee ROTTA, Appellee.
No. 3D10-2982.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Aug. 3, 2011.
Mitrani, Rynor, Adamsky & Toland, and Pamela A. Chamberlin and Jeffrey A. Ry-nor, Miami, for appellant.
Lee Milich, Fort Lauderdale, for appel-lee.
Before ROTHENBERG and LAGOA, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered consequent to our opinion in Rotta v. Rotta, 34 So.3d 107 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010). Contrary to the appellant's argument, we find the decision under review not only in full accordance with, but mandatorily required, by our previous opinion. See, e.g., Pelican Real Estate & Dev. Co. v. Boone, 60 So.3d 502 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011); Torres v. Jones, 652 So.2d 893 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995).
Affirmed.
LAGOA, J" and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge, concur.