Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Daniel MONTIEL-RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-11-07
Citations: 670 F. App'x 299
Docket Number: No. 16-40365 Summary Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Daniel MONTIEL-RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 670
Pages: 299–299

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Daniel MONTIEL-RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant
No. 16-40365 Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Date Filed: 11/07/2016
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Daniel Montiel-Ramirez, Pro Se
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Daniel Montiel-Ramirez has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief that relies on Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Montiel-Ramirez has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant parts of the record reflected therein, as well as Montiel-Ra-mirez's response. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5½ Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.