Case Name: Phillip PARISH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2016-07-12
Citations: 495 S.W.3d 788
Docket Number: No. ED 102913
Parties: Phillip PARISH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J. and Angela T. Quigless, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 495
Pages: 788–788

Head Matter:
Phillip PARISH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 102913
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Filed: July 12, 2016
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied August 15, 2016
Srikant Chigurupati, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO. 63101, for appellant.
Christine K. Lesicko, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Mo. 65102, for respondent.
Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J. and Angela T. Quigless, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Phillip Parish ("Movant") appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Movant contends the motion court erred in denying his motion because his counsel was ineffective for: 1) failing to properly investigate certain witnesses; and/or 2) misleading him as to the results of that investigation.
We find the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).