Case Name: Paul B. ROSEMOND, Appellant, v. DeSOTO LAND AND CATTLE COMPANY and Integon Indemnity Corporation, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1984-06-08
Citations: 452 So. 2d 122
Docket Number: No. AU-53
Parties: Paul B. ROSEMOND, Appellant, v. DeSOTO LAND AND CATTLE COMPANY and Integon Indemnity Corporation, Appellees.
Judges: SHIVERS and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 452
Pages: 122–122

Head Matter:
Paul B. ROSEMOND, Appellant, v. DeSOTO LAND AND CATTLE COMPANY and Integon Indemnity Corporation, Appellees.
No. AU-53.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
June 8, 1984.
Alex Lancaster, Sarasota, for appellant.
Peter C. Burkert of Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, Fort Myers, for appellees.

Opinion:
MILLS, Judge.
The deputy commissioner correctly denied Rosemond's claim for workers' compensation benefits. There was competent substantial evidence to support the finding that there was not an employer/employee relationship between Rosemond and DeSo-to Land & Cattle Company.
AFFIRMED.
SHIVERS and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.