Case Name: A.S., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1998-04-17
Citations: 714 So. 2d 1038
Docket Number: No. 96-03763
Parties: A.S., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ALTENBERND and FULMER, JJ„ concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 714
Pages: 1038–1039

Head Matter:
A.S., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 96-03763.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
April 17, 1998.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow and Frank D.L. Winstead, Assistant Public Defender, Clearwater, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee and Michael J. Scionti, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

Opinion:
FRANK, Acting Chief Judge.
We affirm A.S.'s adjudication of delinquen: cy. We remand this ease, however, for correction of the sentence. Although the trial court orally pronounced that A.S.'s sentences for Counts I and II would be served concurrently, the written commitment order provides that the sentences are to run consecutively. 'When there is a difference between a court's oral pronouncement and a written order, the oral pronouncement controls." D.F. v. State, 650 So.2d 1097, 1098 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). Accordingly, we remand for correction of the written order to conform to the oral pronouncement that the sentences are to run concurrently.
Remanded with instructions.
ALTENBERND and FULMER, JJ" concur.