Case Name: The People of State of New York, Respondent, v. Marshall Rosado, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2011-10-25
Citations: 88 A.D.3d 974
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of State of New York, Respondent, v Marshall Rosado, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 88
Pages: 974–974

Head Matter:
The People of State of New York, Respondent, v Marshall Rosado, Appellant.
[931 NYS2d 526]

Opinion:
The Supreme Court properly determined that the defendant was not entitled to a downward departure from his presumptive risk level and, thus, properly designated him a level two sex offender (see People v Wyatt, 89 AD3d 112 [2011]; People v Livingston, 87 AD3d 628 [2011]; People v Alston, 86 AD3d 553; 554 [2011]; People v Rodriguez, 67 AD3d 596, 597 [2009]; People v Adams, 44 AD3d 1020 [2007]; People v Wragg, 41 AD3d 1273, 1274 [2007]; cf. People v Stevens, 55 AD3d 892, 894 [2008]).
The defendant's remaining contention is without merit. Dillon, J.E, Balkin, Eng and Cohen, JJ., concur.