Case Name: David LUSIK, Appellant v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE; Cynthia Daub, Board Secretary; Matthew T. Mangino, Esquire, Board Member; Allan M. Robinson, Esquire, Board Attorney; Judith B. Selvey, Parole Staff Technician; Steven Palm, Unlicensed Therapist; Dr. Simmons, Staff Psychologist; Unit Manager Heberling; and Eric D. Ray, Corrections Classification Program Manager, Appellees
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2012-05-07
Citations: 43 A.3d 1287
Docket Number: 
Parties: David LUSIK, Appellant v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE; Cynthia Daub, Board Secretary; Matthew T. Mangino, Esquire, Board Member; Allan M. Robinson, Esquire, Board Attorney; Judith B. Selvey, Parole Staff Technician; Steven Palm, Unlicensed Therapist; Dr. Simmons, Staff Psychologist; Unit Manager Heberling; and Eric D. Ray, Corrections Classification Program Manager, Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 43
Pages: 1287–1287

Head Matter:
David LUSIK, Appellant v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE; Cynthia Daub, Board Secretary; Matthew T. Mangino, Esquire, Board Member; Allan M. Robinson, Esquire, Board Attorney; Judith B. Selvey, Parole Staff Technician; Steven Palm, Unlicensed Therapist; Dr. Simmons, Staff Psychologist; Unit Manager Heberling; and Eric D. Ray, Corrections Classification Program Manager, Appellees.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
May 7, 2012.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 7th day of May, 2012, the order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED.
The request for Leave for Permission to File Application Rule 2501(a) filed April 4, 2012 and the request for Leave to File the Documents filed on April 23, 2012 are DENIED.