Case Name: David HICKS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; John Lamanna, Warden of FCI Edgefield in his official capacity, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-12-18
Citations: 358 F. App'x 393
Docket Number: No. 09-7205
Parties: David HICKS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; John Lamanna, Warden of FCI Edgefield in his official capacity, Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 358
Pages: 393–394

Head Matter:
David HICKS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; John Lamanna, Warden of FCI Edgefield in his official capacity, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 09-7205.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 15, 2009.
Decided: Dec. 18, 2009.
David Hicks, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Drake, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
David Hicks, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hicks v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 603 F.Supp.2d 835 (D.S.C.2009; filed June 22, 2009 and entered June 23, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.