Case Name: Marian HUTNICK, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Donald BEIL, Defendant/Respondent, Lillian E. Beil, Mercantile Trust Company, N.A., and Rosalind Sell, Defendants
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-03-01
Citations: 161 S.W.3d 847
Docket Number: No. ED 83521
Parties: Marian HUTNICK, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Donald BEIL, Defendant/Respondent, Lillian E. Beil, Mercantile Trust Company, N.A., and Rosalind Sell, Defendants.
Judges: Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 161
Pages: 847–848

Head Matter:
Marian HUTNICK, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Donald BEIL, Defendant/Respondent, Lillian E. Beil, Mercantile Trust Company, N.A., and Rosalind Sell, Defendants.
No. ED 83521.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
March 1, 2005.
Rehearing Denied April 19, 2005.
Michael A. Gross, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
James H. Ferrick, III, Erin F. Bernstein, Greensfelder, Hemker & Gale, PC, St. Louis, MO, for respondent Donald Beil.
Charles A. Seigel, III, Seigel & Wolff, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for defendant Lillian E. Beil.
Michael N. Bartolacci, Thompson Co-burn LLP, St. Louis, MO, for defendant Mercantile Trust Co.
Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a judgment that approved the final accounting for a trust. The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a written memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).