Case Name: In the Matter of N. W., a Child. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Respondent, v. K. H., aka K. L. H., aka K. L. H. and R. W., aka R. L. W., aka R. L. W., Appellants. In the Matter of S. W., a Child. Department of Human Services, Petitioner-Respondent, v. K. H., aka K. L. H., aka K. L. H. and R. W., aka R. L. W., aka R. L. W., Appellants.
Court: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2018-09-12
Citations: 425 P.3d 506
Docket Number: A166697 (Control); A166698
Parties: In the Matter of N. W., a Child.
Judges: Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Garrett, Judge, and Powers, Judge.
Reporter: Pacific Reporter 3d
Volume: 425
Pages: 506–507

Head Matter:
In the Matter of N. W., a Child.
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Respondent,
v.
K. H., aka K. L. H., aka K. L. H. and R. W., aka R. L. W., aka R. L. W., Appellants.
In the Matter of S. W., a Child.
Department of Human Services, Petitioner-Respondent,
v.
K. H., aka K. L. H., aka K. L. H. and R. W., aka R. L. W., aka R. L. W., Appellants.
A166697 (Control)
A166698
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Submitted May 31, 2018.
September 12, 2018
Shannon Storey, Chief Defender, Juvenile Appellate Section, and Sarah Peterson, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant K. H.
G. Aron Perez-Selsky filed the brief for appellant R. W.
Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and
Jeff J. Payne, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Garrett, Judge, and Powers, Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
In this consolidated appeal, mother and father appeal judgments entered after the juvenile court denied their motion to dismiss jurisdiction and terminate the court's wardship over their children, N and S. Parents assert that the Department of Human Services (DHS) failed to prove that the bases for jurisdiction-parents' substance abuse and domestic violence-continued to place the children at risk of serious loss or injury at the time they moved to terminate wardship. See Dept. of Human Services v. J. M. , 260 Or. App. 261, 267, 317 P.3d 402 (2013) (DHS must prove "that the factual bases for jurisdiction persist to the degree that they pose a current threat of serious loss or injury that is reasonably likely to be realized"). The state concedes that the evidence DHS presented at the hearing was insufficient to establish that the bases of jurisdiction persisted or, if the bases persisted, that they posed a current threat of serious loss or injury to the children that is reasonably likely to be realized. We agree and accept the state's concession; we therefore reverse.
Reversed.