Case Name: Henry Rutledge v. The State
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1924-11-26
Citations: 98 Tex. Crim. 403
Docket Number: No. 8515
Parties: Henry Rutledge v. The State.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Criminal Reports
Volume: 98
Pages: 403–404

Head Matter:
Henry Rutledge v. The State.
No. 8515.
Delivered November 26, 1924.
No motion, for rehearing filed.
Aggravated Assault — Charge of Court — Objections to.
Objections to the charge of the court must be presented in a bill of exceptions, or notation on the purported objections signed by the trial judge. Otherwise such objections will not be considered on appeal.
Appeal from the County Court of Lavaca County. Tried below before the Hon. C. L. Stavinoha, Judge.
Appeal from a conviction of an aggravated assault; penalty, a fine of $225.
No brief filed for appellant.
Tom Garrard, State’s Attorney, and Grover C. Morris, Assistant State’s Attorney, for the State.

Opinion:
LATTIMORE, Judge.
— Appellant was convicted in the County Court of Lavaca County of an aggravated assault, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $225.
The record is before us without any statement of facts or bills of exception. There appears in the record what purports to be appellant's objections to the charge of the court, but the fact that same were presented to the learned trial judge for his action is not evidenced by any bill 6f exceptions or notation on the purported objections. The indictment is sufficient and the charge submits the law.
No error appearing, the judgment will be affirmed.
Affirmed.