Case Name: Frank Ciarleglio et al. v. Bernard Shapiro, Welfare Commissioner, et al.
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1968-12-10
Citations: 157 Conn. 596
Docket Number: 
Parties: Frank Ciarleglio et al. v. Bernard Shapiro, Welfare Commissioner, et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 157
Pages: 596–596

Head Matter:
Frank Ciarleglio et al. v. Bernard Shapiro, Welfare Commissioner, et al.
King, C. J., Alcorn, House, Thim: and Ryan, Js.
Argued December 10
decided December 10, 1968
Frank A. Francis, with whom was Seymour L. Kroopnick, for the appellants (plaintiffs).
Francis J. MacGregor, assistant attorney general, for the appellee (named defendant).
Albert J. Callahan, pro se as guardian ad litem for the appellee (defendant Anthony Ciarleglio).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The plaintiffs seek to set aside a decree of adoption, rendered by the Probate Court for the district of Hartford, on the ground that the welfare commissioner failed to comply with the requirements of that portion of what is now General Statutes § 45-63 which requires that he shall, in his report to the Probate Court, "indicate the physical and mental status of the child." The subordinate facts support the conclusion of the trial court that there was no basis for setting aside the decree.
There is no error.