Case Name: Arnold Ainley WRIGHT, III, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Alton BASKERVILLE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-07-24
Citations: 41 F. App'x 656
Docket Number: No. 02-6401
Parties: Arnold Ainley WRIGHT, III, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Alton BASKERVILLE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 41
Pages: 656–656

Head Matter:
Arnold Ainley WRIGHT, III, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Alton BASKERVILLE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 02-6401.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 18, 2002.
Decided July 24, 2002.
Arnold Ainley Wright, III, Appellant Pro Se. Virginia Bidwell Theisen, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Arnold Ainley Wright, III, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. See Wright v. Baskerville, No. CA-01-334-3 (E.D.Va. Feb. 26, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.