Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rudolph Valentino MURRAY, a/k/a Trini, a/k/a Rudy, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-09-14
Citations: 478 F. App'x 36
Docket Number: No. 12-7160
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rudolph Valentino MURRAY, a/k/a Trini, a/k/a Rudy, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 478
Pages: 36–37

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rudolph Valentino MURRAY, a/k/a Trini, a/k/a Rudy, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-7160.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 11, 2012.
Decided: Sept. 14, 2012.
Rudolph Valentino Murray, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Rudolph Valentino Murray appeals the district court's order denying his motion seeking a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error, given that Murray is ineligible for the reduction that he seeks. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. United States v. Murray, No. 2:97-cr-00025-AWA-1 (E.D.Va. May 31, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.