Case Name: Armando Cervantes MENESES, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-01-27
Citations: 164 F. App'x 628
Docket Number: No. 05-74535
Parties: Armando Cervantes MENESES, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: T.G. NELSON, SILVERMAN and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 164
Pages: 628–629

Head Matter:
Armando Cervantes MENESES, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 05-74535.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 23, 2006.
Decided Jan. 27, 2006.
Armando Cervantes Meneses, Eloy, AZ, pro se.
Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, District Director, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Cynthia M. Parsons, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Respondent.
Before: T.G. NELSON, SILVERMAN and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Respondent's motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.
All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c), shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.