Case Name: CAN AM INVESTMENT REALTY, INC., et al., Appellants, v. A.F. "Jerry" EGAN, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-05-08
Citations: 561 So. 2d 10
Docket Number: No. 89-517
Parties: CAN AM INVESTMENT REALTY, INC., et al., Appellants, v. A.F. “Jerry” EGAN, Appellee.
Judges: Before FERGUSON, LEVY and GERSTEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 561
Pages: 10–10

Head Matter:
CAN AM INVESTMENT REALTY, INC., et al., Appellants, v. A.F. “Jerry” EGAN, Appellee.
No. 89-517.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 8, 1990.
St. Laurent & St. Laurent and Louis S. St. Laurent, II, for appellants.
Cunningham, Albritton, Lenzi, Warner, Bragg & Miller, and Alfred 0. Bragg, Marathon, for appellee.
Before FERGUSON, LEVY and GERSTEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellee concedes that, due to the ambiguity in the operative dates involved, the two counts of the Complaint which allege breach of contract were improperly dismissed. Accordingly, the dismissal of those two counts must be reversed, with those portions of the Complaint being remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.
In all other aspects, the actions of the trial court are affirmed.
Affirmed in part and Reversed in part and remanded.