Case Name: Barry GREEN, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William K. SUTER, Clerk; Clayton R. Higgins, Jr., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-02-10
Citations: 166 F. App'x 90
Docket Number: No. 05-1964
Parties: Barry GREEN, Jr., Plaintiff—Appellant, v. William K. SUTER, Clerk; Clayton R. Higgins, Jr., Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 166
Pages: 90–91

Head Matter:
Barry GREEN, Jr., Plaintiff—Appellant, v. William K. SUTER, Clerk; Clayton R. Higgins, Jr., Defendants—Appellees.
No. 05-1964.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 31, 2006.
Decided: Feb. 10, 2006.
Barry Green, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Barry Green, Jr., appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil action without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Green v. Suter, No. CA-05-1674-3 (D.S.C. Aug. 18, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED