Case Name: Wilma Fay KISER, Petitioner, v. CLINCHFIELD COAL COMPANY; Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, Respondents
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-04-20
Citations: 95 F. App'x 495
Docket Number: No. 03-2445
Parties: Wilma Fay KISER, Petitioner, v. CLINCHFIELD COAL COMPANY; Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 95
Pages: 495–496

Head Matter:
Wilma Fay KISER, Petitioner, v. CLINCHFIELD COAL COMPANY; Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, Respondents.
No. 03-2445.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 15, 2004.
Decided April 20, 2004.
Wilma Fay Kiser, Appellant pro se. Timothy Ward Gresham, Penn, Stuart & Eskridge, Abingdon, Virginia; Patricia May Nece, Sarah Marie Hurley, United States Department of Labor, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.
Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Wilma Fay Kiser seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and orders affirming the administrative law judge's denial of her survivor's claim for black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. § 901-945 (2000) and denying reconsideration. Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. See Kiser v. Clinchfield Coal Co., No. 02-0588-BLA (BRB Apr. 24, 2003, Oct. 15, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED