Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Timothy Brian HOWELL, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-10-04
Citations: 669 F. App'x 154
Docket Number: No. 16-6854
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Timothy Brian HOWELL, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 669
Pages: 154–155

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Timothy Brian HOWELL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-6854
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: September 29, 2016
Decided: October 4, 2016
Timothy Brian Howell, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Blue Boggs, Robert Michael Hamilton, Michael Francis Joseph, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Timothy Brian Howell appeals the district court's order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of sentence based on Amendment 782 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. Howell claims that the district court did not adequately explain why it declined to order a larger sentence reduction pursuant to Amendment 782. Having reviewed the record, we find that the district court sufficiently explained its rationale for the sentence it imposed. We therefore affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED