Case Name: In the Matter of the Application of EARL AMBROSE for a Writ of Habeas Corpus
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1934-12-14
Citations: 3 Cal. App. 2d 752
Docket Number: Crim. No. 305
Parties: In the Matter of the Application of EARL AMBROSE for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports, Second Series
Volume: 3
Pages: 752–752

Head Matter:
[Crim. No. 305.
Fourth Appellate District.
December 14, 1934.]
In the Matter of the Application of EARL AMBROSE for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.
Harry Pransky and James W. Carter for Petitioner.
Earl Redwine, District Attorney, for Respondent.

Opinion:
BARNARD, P. J.
This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus. With the exception of the name of the petitioner, the essential facts herein are identical with those appearing in the case of In re Salas, ante, p. 98 [38 Pac. (2d) 806], this day decided. For the reasons therein given, a similar order should be entered herein.
The writ is discharged and the petitioner remanded.
Marks, J., and Jennings, J., concurred.
A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on December 27, 1934.