Case Name: Clayton E. YOUNG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kathleen GREEN, Warden; M. Dean, Case Manager; John A. Rowley, Commissioner of Corrections; State of Maryland, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-10-18
Citations: 251 F. App'x 224
Docket Number: No. 07-7195
Parties: Clayton E. YOUNG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kathleen GREEN, Warden; M. Dean, Case Manager; John A. Rowley, Commissioner of Corrections; State of Maryland, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 251
Pages: 224–225

Head Matter:
Clayton E. YOUNG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kathleen GREEN, Warden; M. Dean, Case Manager; John A. Rowley, Commissioner of Corrections; State of Maryland, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 07-7195.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 11, 2007.
Decided: Oct. 18, 2007.
Clayton E. Young, Appellant Pro Se. Rex Schultz Gordon, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Clayton E. Young seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying reconsideration of the denial of his motion for appointment of counsel and denying his motion for discovery. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The orders Young seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.