Case Name: Robert GERRISH, Respondent, v. 56 LEONARD LLC, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.
Court: New York Court for the Correction of Errors
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2018-02-20
Citations: 94 N.E.3d 899
Docket Number: No. 72 SSM 38
Parties: Robert GERRISH, Respondent,
v.
56 LEONARD LLC, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: North Eastern Reporter 3d
Volume: 94
Pages: 899–899

Head Matter:
Robert GERRISH, Respondent,
v.
56 LEONARD LLC, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.
No. 72 SSM 38
Court of Appeals of New York.
Decided February 20, 2018
Ropers, Majeski, Kohn & Bentley, New York City (Jason L. Beckerman and Douglas H. Miller of counsel), for appellants.
Sacks and Sacks, LLP, New York City (Scott N. Singer of counsel), for respondent.
Shaub, Ahmuty, Citrin & Spratt, LLP, Lake Success (Christopher Simone and Gerard S. Rath of counsel), for Real Estate Board of New York, amicus curiae.
OPINION OF THE COURT

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM:
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative. Liberally construing the complaint, presuming the facts alleged to be true and affording plaintiff the benefit of all favorable inferences, the complaint states a cause of action and defendants' documentary evidence does not establish, as a matter of law, that the work site where plaintiff's injury occurred was not a construction area in accordance with Labor Law § 241(6).
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals ( 22 NYCRR 500.11 ), order affirmed, with costs, and certified question answered in the affirmative, in a memorandum.
Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia and Wilson concur. Judge Feinman took no part.