Case Name: Sherri BOARDLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-05-31
Citations: 653 F. App'x 781
Docket Number: No. 15-2517
Parties: Sherri BOARDLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 653
Pages: 781–782

Head Matter:
Sherri BOARDLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 15-2517
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 29, 2016
Decided: May 31, 2016
Sherri Boardley, Appellant Pro Se. Edwin Lewis Kincer, Jr., Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Sherri Boardley seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing her complaint without prejudice. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Boardley seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an ap-pealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir.1993). Accordingly, we grant Ap-pellee's motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and remand the case to the district court with instructions to allow Boardley to file an amended complaint. See Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc'y, Inc., 807 F.3d 619, 630 (4th Cir.2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED AND REMANDED.