Case Name: Williams v. Welles
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1791-02
Citations: 1 Root 261
Docket Number: 
Parties: Williams v. Welles.
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 1
Pages: 261–261

Head Matter:
Williams v. Welles.
Many matters which would be proper in a petition for a new trial, the coiirt will not go into upon a remonstrance against a return of auditors.
Eetueu of auditors, against which, a remonstrance was made; stating sundry mistaken allowances in said return, which at the hearing the defendant was unable to correct; but is now abundantly able to do, etc. etc.

Opinion:
By the Court.
Such an inquiry might be proper in a petition for a new trial; but would be improper to go into upon the remonstrance.