Case Name: Daniel S. JAMES, Respondent, v. DULUTH CLINIC, Relator, BRAC, Administrator.
Court: Minnesota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Minnesota
Decision Date: 2019-01-08
Citations: 921 N.W.2d 555
Docket Number: A18-1498
Parties: Daniel S. JAMES, Respondent,
v.
DULUTH CLINIC, Relator,
Judges: Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.
Reporter: North Western Reporter 2d
Volume: 921
Pages: 555–556

Head Matter:
Daniel S. JAMES, Respondent,
v.
DULUTH CLINIC, Relator,
BRAC, Administrator.
A18-1498
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
January 8, 2019
Eric W. Beyer, SiebenCarey, P.A., Duluth, Minnesota, for respondent.
Edward Q. Cassidy, Fredrikson & Byron, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota, for relator.
Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.
ORDER

Opinion:
Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed August 21, 2018, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton , 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that "[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view," doing no more than establishing the law of the case).
Employee is awarded $3,500 in attorney fees.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ _
G. Barry Anderson
Associate Justice