Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nikia FRANKLIN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-03-07
Citations: 221 F. App'x 364
Docket Number: No. 06-20606
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nikia FRANKLIN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 221
Pages: 364–365

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nikia FRANKLIN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-20606
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 7, 2007.
James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Nikia Franklin presents arguments that she concedes are foreclosed by the law of the case, see, e.g., Ward v. Santa Fe Indep. Sch. Dist., 393 F.3d 599, 607-08 (5th Cir.2004) (reiterating that a party cannot raise an issue on appeal that could have been raised in an earlier appeal in the same case), and by circuit precedent, see, e.g., United States v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir.2001)(rejeeting a Commerce Clause challenge to the felon-in-possession-of-a-firearm statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)). The Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.