Case Name: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Jorge SUEIRO, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1986-05-08
Citations: 487 So. 2d 1071
Docket Number: No. 67468
Parties: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Jorge SUEIRO, Respondent.
Judges: BOYD, C.J., and ADKINS, OVERTON and McDONALD, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 487
Pages: 1071–1071

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Jorge SUEIRO, Respondent.
No. 67468.
Supreme Court of Florida.
May 8, 1986.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Richard L. Polin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, for petitioner.
James D. Keegan, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, Gitlitz, Keegan and'Dittmar, Miami, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We review Sueiro v. State, 471 So.2d 1317 (Fla.3d DCA 1985), because of direct and express conflict with State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985). We have jurisdiction, article V, section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution.
The district court below held, inter alia, that sentencing guidelines in effect at the time of sentencing, but not in effect at the time the offense was committed, could not be applied. We quash the portion of the decision so holding on the authority of Jackson and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
It is so ordered.
BOYD, C.J., and ADKINS, OVERTON and McDONALD, JJ., concur.
EHRLICH, J., concurs specially with an opinion, in which SHAW, J., concurs.
BARKETT, J., concurs specially with an opinion.