Case Name: Village of Springville, Appellant-Respondent, v. Amherst Construction, Inc., Respondent-Appellant, et al., Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1989-07-12
Citations: 152 A.D.2d 963
Docket Number: 
Parties: Village of Springville, Appellant-Respondent, v Amherst Construction, Inc., Respondent-Appellant, et al., Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 152
Pages: 963–963

Head Matter:
Village of Springville, Appellant-Respondent, v Amherst Construction, Inc., Respondent-Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Opinion:
Order unanimously modified on the law and defendant's cross motion granted and as modified affirmed with costs to defendant Amherst Construction, Inc., in accordance with the following memorandum: Special Term properly denied plaintiff's application to vacate the arbitration proceeding (see, Sherrill v Grayco Bldrs., 64 NY2d 261, 273-274; Faberge Inti, v Di Pino, 109 AD2d 235, 239). To effect an orderly process, however, plaintiff's action against the multiple defendants should be stayed until completion of the arbitration (see, Carthage Cent. School Dist. No. 1 v Reddick & Sons, 79 AD2d 883, 884). (Appeals from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J. — arbitration.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Denman, Green and Pine, JJ.