Case Name: AMELIA NASH AND FRED NASH, HER HUSBAND, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. BELLA LERNER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND JOHN DOES, TOWNSHIP OF EDISON, AND RICHARD ROES, DEFENDANTS
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1999-03-17
Citations: 157 N.J. 535
Docket Number: 
Parties: AMELIA NASH AND FRED NASH, HER HUSBAND, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. BELLA LERNER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND JOHN DOES, TOWNSHIP OF EDISON, AND RICHARD ROES, DEFENDANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 157
Pages: 535–536

Head Matter:
724 A.2d 798
AMELIA NASH AND FRED NASH, HER HUSBAND, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. BELLA LERNER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND JOHN DOES, TOWNSHIP OF EDISON, AND RICHARD ROES, DEFENDANTS.
Argued February 16, 1999 —
Decided March 17, 1999.
R. Peter Connell argued the cause for appellant (Connell & Connell, attorneys; Mr. Connell and Ronald S. Yuro, on the briefs).
Michael A. Cohan argued the cause for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Rodriguez, reported at 311 N.J.Super. 183, 193, 709 A.2d 799 (1998).
Justice POLLOCK has filed a separate dissenting opinion.