Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francisco GONZALEZ-CISNEROS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-11-17
Citations: 81 F. App'x 673
Docket Number: No. 02-10524
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Francisco GONZALEZ-CISNEROS, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 81
Pages: 673–673

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Francisco GONZALEZ-CISNEROS, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 02-10524.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 10, 2003.
Decided Nov. 17, 2003.
Michael Thomas Morrissey, Esq., USPX — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Gail Gianasi Natale, Esq., Law Office of Gail Gianasi Natale, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: KOZINSKI, SILVERMAN, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Francisco Gonzalez-Cisneros appeals his jury trial conviction and 135-month sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), 846.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Gonzalez-Cisneros has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.
Gonzalez-Cisneros has filed a pro se supplemental brief. However, our independent review of the record, pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), and his pro se supplemental brief, discloses no grounds for relief. Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.