Case Name: Esther M. Mertz Trust v. Fox Meadow Partners, Ltd. (Action No. 1.); Esther M. Mertz Trust, Respondent, v. Fox Meadow Partners, Ltd., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 2.)
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2002-02-07
Citations: 97 N.Y.2d 714
Docket Number: 
Parties: Esther M. Mertz Trust v Fox Meadow Partners, Ltd. (Action No. 1.) Esther M. Mertz Trust, Respondent, v Fox Meadow Partners, Ltd., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 2.)
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 97
Pages: 714–714

Head Matter:
Esther M. Mertz Trust v Fox Meadow Partners, Ltd. (Action No. 1.) Esther M. Mertz Trust, Respondent, v Fox Meadow Partners, Ltd., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 2.)
Submitted December 31, 2001;
decided February 7, 2002

Opinion:
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the mortgage foreclosure action within the meaning of the Constitution.