Case Name: Jerome Julius BROWN, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Herbert LEVENSTEIN, Attorney, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-08-18
Citations: 105 F. App'x 518
Docket Number: No. 04-6691
Parties: Jerome Julius BROWN, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Herbert LEVENSTEIN, Attorney, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 105
Pages: 518–519

Head Matter:
Jerome Julius BROWN, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Herbert LEVENSTEIN, Attorney, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 04-6691.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 12, 2004.
Decided: Aug. 18, 2004.
Jerome Julius Brown, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Jerome Julius Brown, Sr. seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing his complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.
Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court's final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the ap peal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corr., 434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (1960)).
The district court's order was entered on the docket on November 27, 1996. The notice of appeal was filed on March 8, 2004. Because Brown failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED