Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lashawn Jermaine JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-07-19
Citations: 444 F. App'x 127
Docket Number: No. 10-30029
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lashawn Jermaine JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: SCHROEDER, ALARCÓN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 444
Pages: 127–127

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lashawn Jermaine JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-30029.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 12, 2011.
Filed July 19, 2011.
James Edmund Seykora, Esquire, Assistant U.S., USBI-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Billings, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Vernon Edward Woodward, Woodward & Casey, PLLC, Billings, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: SCHROEDER, ALARCÓN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Lashawn Jermaine Johnson appeals from the 353-month sentence imposed following his jury-trial conviction for various drug offenses involving cocaine base. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Johnson contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable because the sentence fails to account for the crack/powder disparity and other 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors. In light of the totality of the circumstances and the factors set forth in section 3553(a), the sentence is substantively reasonable. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 993 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.