Case Name: INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL 323, Sheet Metal Workers International Association, Local 130, Palm Coast Building and Construction Trade Council, Inc., George C. Hudspeth and Roger C. Hudspeth, Appellants, v. RICHWAY, A DIVISION OF FEDERATED DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., a Delaware corporation, authorized to do business in the State of Florida, et al., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1983-08-17
Citations: 436 So. 2d 374
Docket Number: No. 82-2573
Parties: INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL 323, Sheet Metal Workers International Association, Local 130, Palm Coast Building and Construction Trade Council, Inc., George C. Hudspeth and Roger C. Hudspeth, Appellants, v. RICHWAY, A DIVISION OF FEDERATED DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., a Delaware corporation, authorized to do business in the State of Florida, et al., Appellee.
Judges: DOWNEY, HURLEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 436
Pages: 374–374

Head Matter:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL 323, Sheet Metal Workers International Association, Local 130, Palm Coast Building and Construction Trade Council, Inc., George C. Hudspeth and Roger C. Hudspeth, Appellants, v. RICHWAY, A DIVISION OF FEDERATED DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., a Delaware corporation, authorized to do business in the State of Florida, et al., Appellee.
No. 82-2573.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Aug. 17, 1983.
Rehearing Denied Sept. 9, 1983.
Howard S. Susskind of Kaplan, Sicking, Hessen, Sugarman, Rosenthal & DeCastro, P.A., Miami, for appellants.
John F. Wymer, III, of Smith, Currie & Hancock, Atlanta, Ga., and Larry A. Klein of Larry A. Klein, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from an order imposing a temporary injunction. We affirm upon authority of Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. San Diego County, 436 U.S. 180, 98 S.Ct. 1745, 56 L.Ed.2d 209 (1978), whose rationale is buttressed by the fact that the National Labor Relations Board had earlier determined: (1) that the conduct of Richway and its state court application were not violations of the National Labor Relations Act, and (2) that the appellants' complaint filed before us be dismissed thereby indicating that it would not provide a forum for this dispute.
AFFIRMED.
DOWNEY, HURLEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.