Case Name: Frank Miraglia, Respondent, v. H & L Holding Corp., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff. Lane & Sons Construction Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2010-02-23
Citations: 14 N.Y.3d 766
Docket Number: 
Parties: Frank Miraglia, Respondent, v H & L Holding Corp., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff. Lane & Sons Construction Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 14
Pages: 766–766

Head Matter:
Frank Miraglia, Respondent, v H & L Holding Corp., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff. Lane & Sons Construction Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.
Submitted December 28, 2009;
decided February 23, 2010

Opinion:
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed that part of Supreme Court's order that denied third-party appellant Lane and Sons Construction Corp.'s motion to amend the judgment, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.