Case Name: BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. PERKINS; BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. NEWTON; BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. PERKINS; BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. ARMSTRONG; BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. OLIVER; BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. SANDERS; BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MILLER; BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. NEWTON
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1961-11-17
Citations: 104 Ga. App. 902
Docket Number: 39206; 39207; 39208; 39209; 39210; 39212; 39214; 39216
Parties: BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. PERKINS. BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. NEWTON. BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. PERKINS. BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. ARMSTRONG. BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. OLIVER. BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. SANDERS. BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MILLER. BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. NEWTON.
Judges: Carlisle, P. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 104
Pages: 902–904

Head Matter:
39206.
39207.
39208.
39209.
39210.
39212.
39214.
39216.
BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. PERKINS. BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. NEWTON. BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. PERKINS. BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. ARMSTRONG. BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. OLIVER. BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. SANDERS. BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MILLER. BANKERS FIDELITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. NEWTON.
Decided November 17, 1961
Rehearing denied November 30, 1961.
Sam F. Lowe, Jr., for plaintiff in error.
L. II. Hilton, Hilton & Hilton, contra.

Opinion:
Custer, Judge.
These cases being controlled by Bankers Fidelity Life Ins. Co. v. Harrison, ante, the judgment of the trial court overruling the first two grounds of demurrer to the petition, and sustaining certain grounds of demurrer to the answer, is affirmed. The judgment overruling the third ground of demurrer to the petition is reversed, and the fourth and fifth grounds of demurrer to the petition are not passed upon.
Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Carlisle, P. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.