Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Terry E. NORRIS, a.k.a. T, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-01-16
Citations: 709 F. App'x 669
Docket Number: No. 17-12666 Non-Argument Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Terry E. NORRIS, a.k.a. T, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MARCUS, JULIE CARNES and HULL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 709
Pages: 669–669

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Terry E. NORRIS, a.k.a. T, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 17-12666 Non-Argument Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
(January 16, 2018)
David Charles Waterman, U.S. Attorney Service — Middle District of Florida, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Ryan Thomas Truskoski, Ryan Thomas Truskoski, PA, Orlando, FL, for Defendant-Appellant
Before MARCUS, JULIE CARNES and HULL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Government's motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal waiver in Appellant's plea agreement is GRANTED. See United States v. Bushert, 997 F.2d 1343, 1350-51 (11th Cir. 1993) (sentence-appeal waiver will be enforced if it was made knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Grinard-Henry, 399 F.3d 1294, 1296 (11th Cir. 2005) (waiver of the right to appeal includes waiver of the right to appeal difficult or debatable legal issues or even blatant error); United States v. Rubbo, 396 F.3d 1330, 1334 (11th Cir. 2005) (plea agreements are like contracts and should be interpreted in accord with what the parties intended).