Case Name: Walter Mack, on behalf of Himself and All Other Creditors of William J. Edell, Similarly Situated, Respondent, v. William Edell, Appellant, et al., Defendants; Clarence F. Grabb, as Receiver, Respondent, v. John Nicholas, as Receiver, Defendant, and Albert E. Gilbert, as Receiver, Respondent; William J. Edell, Appellant, v. Shirley M. Edell, Respondent; Evelyn M. Edell, Respondent, v. William J. Edell, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1962-09-14
Citations: 17 A.D.2d 767
Docket Number: 
Parties: Walter Mack, on behalf of Himself and All Other Creditors of William J. Edell, Similarly Situated, Respondent, v. William Edell, Appellant, et al., Defendants. Clarence F. Grabb, as Receiver, Respondent, v. John Nicholas, as Receiver, Defendant, and Albert E. Gilbert, as Receiver, Respondent. William J. Edell, Appellant, v. Shirley M. Edell, Respondent. Evelyn M. Edell, Respondent, v. William J. Edell, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 17
Pages: 767–767

Head Matter:
Walter Mack, on behalf of Himself and All Other Creditors of William J. Edell, Similarly Situated, Respondent, v. William Edell, Appellant, et al., Defendants. Clarence F. Grabb, as Receiver, Respondent, v. John Nicholas, as Receiver, Defendant, and Albert E. Gilbert, as Receiver, Respondent. William J. Edell, Appellant, v. Shirley M. Edell, Respondent. Evelyn M. Edell, Respondent, v. William J. Edell, Appellant.

Opinion:
Motion for reargument granted and ease set down for October 1962 Term. The attorneys for the respondents are directed to show cause upon the reargument of the appeal why the conduct described by them in their letter of September 7, 1962, should not be held to be a violation of the letter and spirit of the order of this court. Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Halpem and McClusky, JJ.