Case Name: Rucker v. The State
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1909-11-09
Citations: 7 Ga. App. 47
Docket Number: 2163
Parties: Rucker v. The State.
Judges: 
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 7
Pages: 47–47

Head Matter:
2163.
Rucker v. The State.
Accusation of assault and battery, from city court of Cordele — ■ Judge Strozier. September 7, 1909.
Argued October 25,
Decided November 9, 1909.
W. B. Dorris, for plaintiff in error.
M. M. Bakes, solicitor, contra.

Opinion:
Hiel, O. J.
1. Tlie first ground of tlie amended motion for a new trial is not verified by tlie trial court, and therefore will not be considered.
2. The trial judge did not abuse his discretion in refusing to grant a new trial because of the alleged newly discovered testimony, the testimony being both cumulative and impeaching.
3. No error appears, and the verdict is supported by the evidence.
Judgment affirmed.