Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jemal Walter WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-03-05
Citations: 219 F. App'x 299
Docket Number: No. 06-7962
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jemal Walter WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 219
Pages: 299–300

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jemal Walter WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-7962.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 22, 2007.
Decided: March 5, 2007.
Jemal Walter Williams, Appellant Pro Se. David Calhoun Stephens, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Jemal Walter Williams appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his motion for reconsideration filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). Our review of the record discloses that this appeal is without merit. Williams has not raised any meritorious issues nor presented any evidence not previously considered by the district court as to its dismissal of Williams' 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion as untimely. We therefore find that the district court's denial of his motion for reconsideration was not an abuse of discretion. United States v. Winestock, 340 F.3d 200, 203 (4th Cir.2003). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.