Case Name: David Thomas SILVERS, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. IREDELL COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES; Donald C. Wall, D.S.S. Dir., in individual and official capacities; Paxton Butler, Asst. D.A., in individual and official capacities; City of Statesville, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-10-17
Citations: 669 F. App'x 182
Docket Number: No. 16-1549
Parties: David Thomas SILVERS, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. IREDELL COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES; Donald C. Wall, D.S.S. Dir., in individual and official capacities; Paxton Butler, Asst. D.A., in individual and official capacities; City of Statesville, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 669
Pages: 182–183

Head Matter:
David Thomas SILVERS, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. IREDELL COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES; Donald C. Wall, D.S.S. Dir., in individual and official capacities; Paxton Butler, Asst. D.A., in individual and official capacities; City of Statesville, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-1549
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: October 13, 2016
Decided: October 17, 2016
David Thomas Silvers, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Patrick Houghton Flanagan, Cran-fill, Sumner & Hartzog, LLP, Charlotte, North Cax-olina; James R. Morgan, Jr., Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, PLLC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Ap-pellees.
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
David Thomas Silvers, Sr., appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accord ingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Silvers v. Iredell Cty. DSS, No. 5:15-cv-00083-RLV-DCK (W.D.N.C. Feb. 3, 2016 & Apr. 15, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the' decisional process.
AFFIRMED