Case Name: Francis MACKENBERG, Employee/Appellant, v. ST. CHARLES SCRAP METAL AND AUTO PARTS, INC., Employer/Respondent, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Additional Party/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-05-04
Citations: 989 S.W.2d 956
Docket Number: No. 74903
Parties: Francis MACKENBERG, Employee/Appellant, v. ST. CHARLES SCRAP METAL AND AUTO PARTS, INC., Employer/Respondent, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Additional Party/Respondent.
Judges: Before JAMES A. PUDLOWSKI, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL Jr., J., and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 989
Pages: 956–957

Head Matter:
Francis MACKENBERG, Employee/Appellant, v. ST. CHARLES SCRAP METAL AND AUTO PARTS, INC., Employer/Respondent, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Additional Party/Respondent.
No. 74903.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
May 4, 1999.
Thomas M. Kendrick, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Beverly E. Temple, Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Louis, for respondent.
Before JAMES A. PUDLOWSKI, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL Jr., J., and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Francis Mackenberg, claimant, appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. Claimant argues that the Commission's findings were not supported by substantial and competent evidence. He alleges that certain hospital bills were "reasonable and necessary and causally related to the injuries sustained" by claimant."
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. The Commission's award was supported by substantial and competent evidence. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).