Case Name: James KUSTIN, Appellant, v. COHEN, NORRIS, SCHERER, WEINBERGER & WOLMER, a partnership of professional associations, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2009-10-14
Citations: 18 So. 3d 730
Docket Number: No. 4D09-1109
Parties: James KUSTIN, Appellant, v. COHEN, NORRIS, SCHERER, WEINBERGER & WOLMER, a partnership of professional associations, Appellee.
Judges: FARMER, HAZOURI and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 18
Pages: 730–731

Head Matter:
James KUSTIN, Appellant, v. COHEN, NORRIS, SCHERER, WEINBERGER & WOLMER, a partnership of professional associations, Appellee.
No. 4D09-1109.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Oct. 14, 2009.
Ned Kimmelman, Boca Raton, for appellant.
Robert B. Goldman of Cohen, Norris, Scherer, Weinberger & Wolmer, North Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This appeal arises from a non-final order denying the appellant's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. We find that the factual disputes in the various affidavits submitted by the parties cannot be reconciled. Accordingly, we reverse the order of the trial court and remand with directions that the trial court conduct an evidentiary hearing on the issue of personal jurisdiction over the appellant. See Venetian Salami Co. v. Parthenais, 554 So.2d 499, 503 (Fla.1989).
FARMER, HAZOURI and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.