Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Karen M. Caza, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2014-11-20
Citations: 24 N.Y.3d 1056
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Karen M. Caza, Appellant.
Judges: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 24
Pages: 1056–1057

Head Matter:
[24 NE3d 593, 999 NYS2d 357]
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Karen M. Caza, Appellant.
Decided November 20, 2014
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Martin J. McGuinness, Queensbury, for appellant.
Respondent precluded.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Defendant's argument that County Court erred in enhancing her sentence by departing from its conditional promise to make her two terms of imprisonment run concurrently is unpreserved for our review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Hawkins, 11 NY3d 484, 491-493 [2008]).
Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, in a memorandum.