Case Name: Ranulfo Carlos Lopez RAMIREZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-03-10
Citations: 174 F. App'x 375
Docket Number: No. 05-71094
Parties: Ranulfo Carlos Lopez RAMIREZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 174
Pages: 375–375

Head Matter:
Ranulfo Carlos Lopez RAMIREZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 05-71094.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 6, 2006.
Filed March 10, 2006.
Amy Ghosh, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.
District Director, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, OIL, DOJ—U.S. Department Of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: BEEZER, T.G. NELSON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Respondent's motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam)(stating standard); 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1); Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir.2003). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.