Case Name: Ronald James GREEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-02-15
Citations: 807 So. 2d 181
Docket Number: No. 5D01-956
Parties: Ronald James GREEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: PETERSON and PLEUS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 807
Pages: 181–181

Head Matter:
Ronald James GREEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D01-956.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Feb. 15, 2002.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Susan A. Fagan, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

Opinion:
GRIFFIN, J.
The defendant concedes the issue raised on appeal is controlled by this court's decision in Stabile v. State, 790 So.2d 1235 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001), in which we certified to the supreme court a question already certified by several other districts. See, e.g., Navarro v. State, 805 So.2d 1047 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Vargas v. State, 789 So.2d 1030 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) and Knight v. State, 791 So.2d 490 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). The Supreme Court of Florida has taken Knight for review and has now answered the question as we did in Stabile. Stabile, 790 So.2d at 1238-39.
AFFIRMED.
PETERSON and PLEUS, JJ., concur.