Case Name: PAUL SEGLIE, APPELLANT, v. HENRY ACKERMAN ET AL., RESPONDENTS
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1917-10-12
Citations: 91 N.J.L. 332
Docket Number: 
Parties: PAUL SEGLIE, APPELLANT, v. HENRY ACKERMAN ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 91
Pages: 332–333

Head Matter:
PAUL SEGLIE, APPELLANT, v. HENRY ACKERMAN ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Argued June 2S, 3917
Decided October 12, 1917.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 90 N. J. L. 118.
For the appellant, George J. McEwan and J. Emil Walscheid.
For the respondents, Collins & Corbin.

Opinion:
Pee Curiam. .
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Kalisch in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.