Case Name: Juan Benito CASTRO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-03-18
Citations: 271 F. App'x 557
Docket Number: No. 07-56556
Parties: Juan Benito CASTRO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 271
Pages: 557–558

Head Matter:
Juan Benito CASTRO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 07-56556.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 10, 2008 .
Filed March 18, 2008.
Juan Benito Castro, Bruceton Mills, WV, pro se.
Before: T.G. NELSON, TASHIMA and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Appellant Juan Benito Castro appeals the district court's order dismissing his case for failure to state a claim and file a new complaint. This court reviews the district court's order de novo, and we affirm. See Bagdadi v. Nazar, 84 F.3d 1194, 1197 (9th Cir.1996); Gibson v. United States, 781 F.2d 1334, 1337 (9th Cir.1986).
Our review of the record and appellant's response to this court's order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.