Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joel GUTIERREZ-JIMENEZ, aka Joel Jimenez-Gutierrez, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-12-03
Citations: 304 F. App'x 493
Docket Number: No. 06-10594
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Joel GUTIERREZ-JIMENEZ, aka Joel Jimenez-Gutierrez, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 304
Pages: 493–494

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Joel GUTIERREZ-JIMENEZ, aka Joel Jimenez-Gutierrez, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 06-10594.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 24, 2008.
Filed Dec. 3, 2008.
John Zachary Boyle, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Joel Gutierrez-Jimenez, White Deer, PA, pro se.
Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Joel Gutierrez-Jimenez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 78-month sentence for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Gutierrez-Jimenez's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.