Case Name: Charles HINTON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1967-07-25
Citations: 201 So. 2d 484
Docket Number: No. 66-895
Parties: Charles HINTON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 201
Pages: 484–485

Head Matter:
Charles HINTON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 66-895.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
July 25, 1967.
Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender, and Phillip A. Hubbart, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Jesse J. McCrary, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant urges reversal on the ground that it was reversible error for the prosecuting attorney to elicit, over objection on cross-examination of the defendant, that defendant had been convicted of a felony.
We have reviewed the record and considered the point in the light of the holding in Collins v. State, 155 Fla. 141, 19 So.2d 718 (1944) and have concluded that no reversible error has been made to appear.
.Affirmed.