Case Name: Margo Charlotte WOODMAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1976-05-04
Citations: 331 So. 2d 364
Docket Number: No. 75-1251
Parties: Margo Charlotte WOODMAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before PEARSON, HENDRY and NATHAN, TJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 331
Pages: 364–365

Head Matter:
Margo Charlotte WOODMAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 75-1251.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 4, 1976.
Max B. Kogen and Geoffrey C. Fleck, Miami, for appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Ira Loewy, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before PEARSON, HENDRY and NATHAN, TJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The defendant, Margo Charlotte Woodman, was found guilty by a jury of forgery, uttering a forged instrument and grand larceny. This appeal is from the adjudication and sentence. The proof of appellant's guilt is overwhelming.
On this appeal, the principal points urge that the appellant did not receive a fair trial because of comments of the state's attorney and improper cross-examination. This position is apparently an afterthought inasmuch as the defendant failed to object to any of the questions which are now claimed to be improper or to object to the claimed improper comments. We hold that in view of the clear and convincing proof of the defendant's guilt, as well as her failure to object, she has failed to prove reversible error. See Akin v. State, 86 Fla. 564, 98 So. 609, 612 (1923), and Thomas v. State, Fla.App.1971, 249 So.2d 510.
Affirmed.