Case Name: Roger Allen POSTMUS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOS ANGELES COUNTY; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-04-16
Citations: 32 F. App'x 970
Docket Number: No. 01-35299; D.C. No. CV 00-01697-BR
Parties: Roger Allen POSTMUS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOS ANGELES COUNTY; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 32
Pages: 970–971

Head Matter:
Roger Allen POSTMUS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOS ANGELES COUNTY; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 01-35299.
D.C. No. CV 00-01697-BR.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 8, 2002.
Decided April 16, 2002.
Before BROWING, KLEINFELD, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Roger Allen Postmus appeals pro se the district court's dismissal for failure to state a claim in his diversity action alleging various defendants engaged in conspiracy, fraud, negligence, malfeasance, and -wrongful death. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm.
We review de novo the district' court's sua sponte dismissal of the complaint under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Thompson v. Davis, 282 F.3d 780, 783 (9th Cir.2002). Postmus's claims are legally frivolous. Accordingly, the district court did not err in dismissing his action. See Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 33, 112 S.Ct. 1728, 118 L.Ed.2d 340 (1992).
All pending motions are denied.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.