Case Name: Miy'at Kali EL-BEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Herman Melvin HOWELL, Judge, Defendant-Appellee, and Clover Police Department; CPL M.L. Wilson; A + Garage & Towing; David Woods; J. Corsey Bentley, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-01-13
Citations: 549 F. App'x 227
Docket Number: No. 13-1991
Parties: Miy’at Kali EL-BEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Herman Melvin HOWELL, Judge, Defendant-Appellee, and Clover Police Department; CPL M.L. Wilson; A + Garage & Towing; David Woods; J. Corsey Bentley, Defendants.
Judges: Before KING, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 549
Pages: 227–227

Head Matter:
Miy’at Kali EL-BEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Herman Melvin HOWELL, Judge, Defendant-Appellee, and Clover Police Department; CPL M.L. Wilson; A + Garage & Towing; David Woods; J. Corsey Bentley, Defendants.
No. 13-1991.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 17, 2013.
Decided: Jan. 13, 2014.
Miy’at Kali El-Bey, Appellant Pro Se.
Before KING, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Miy'at Kali El-Bey seeks to appeal the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Defendant Judge Herman Melvin Howell without prejudice from this action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order El-Bey seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.