Case Name: Bernard BARNETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-11-21
Citations: 206 F. App'x 314
Docket Number: No. 06-7130
Parties: Bernard BARNETT, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee.
Judges: Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 206
Pages: 314–315

Head Matter:
Bernard BARNETT, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee.
No. 06-7130.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 15, 2006.
Decided: Nov. 21, 2006.
Bernard Barnett, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Jack Bondurant, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Bernard Barnett appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reconsideration under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) in relation to the court's denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Barnett v. United States, No. 7:06-cv-00336-JLK (W.D.Va. June 12, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.