Case Name: William BERKOWITZ v. Theophil KLINGMANN
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1936-03-13
Citations: 84 F.2d 991
Docket Number: No. 6960
Parties: William BERKOWITZ v. Theophil KLINGMANN.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 84
Pages: 991–991

Head Matter:
William BERKOWITZ v. Theophil KLINGMANN.
No. 6960.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
March 13, 1936.
Payne & Payne, of Detroit, Mich., for appellant.
Douglas, Barbour, Desenberg & Purdy, of Detroit, Mich., for appellees.
Before MOORMAN, HICKS, and ALLEN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
It appearing from the record that this action was not commenced (section 14067 of the Compiled Laws of Michigan 1929; Whalen v. Wayne Circuit Judge, 239 Mich. 482, 214 N.W. 410) within the time allowed therefor by the statute of limitations (section 13976 of the Compiled Laws of Michigan 1929) for the bringing of such actions, it is ordered that the judgment be affirmed.