Case Name: Samuel C. HUTCHISON v. Father Francis LUDDY, Bishop James Hogan, Monsignor Thomas Madden, Monsignor Roy F. Kline, Monsignor Paul Panza, Monsignor Ignatius Wadas, Diocese of Altoona-Johnstown, St. Mary's Catholic Church, Cardinal John Krol and the Archdiocese of Philadelphia. Appeal of PITTSBURGH PRESS COMPANY
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1993-02-02
Citations: 533 Pa. 73
Docket Number: Appeal No. 76 W.D. Appeal Docket 1991
Parties: Samuel C. HUTCHISON v. Father Francis LUDDY, Bishop James Hogan, Monsignor Thomas Madden, Monsignor Roy F. Kline, Monsignor Paul Panza, Monsignor Ignatius Wadas, Diocese of Altoona-Johnstown, St. Mary’s Catholic Church, Cardinal John Krol and the Archdiocese of Philadelphia. Appeal of PITTSBURGH PRESS COMPANY.
Judges: Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, ZAPPALA, PAPADAKOS and CAPPY, JJ., concurring.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 533
Pages: 73–75

Head Matter:
619 A.2d 276
Samuel C. HUTCHISON v. Father Francis LUDDY, Bishop James Hogan, Monsignor Thomas Madden, Monsignor Roy F. Kline, Monsignor Paul Panza, Monsignor Ignatius Wadas, Diocese of Altoona-Johnstown, St. Mary’s Catholic Church, Cardinal John Krol and the Archdiocese of Philadelphia. Appeal of PITTSBURGH PRESS COMPANY.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued Sept. 26, 1991.
Decided Feb. 2, 1993.
Scott E. Henderson, Kevin C. Abbott, Thorp, Reed & Armstrong, Pittsburgh, for appellant.
Carl A. Eck, Maria Zulick, Meyer, Darragh, Buckler, Bebenek & Eck, Pittsburgh, for Bishop James Hogan, Monsignor Thomas Madden, Monsignor Roy F. Kline, Monsignor Paul Panza, Monsignor Ignatius Wadas, Diocese of Altoona-Johnstown, and St. Mary’s Catholic Church.
Richard M. Serbin, Joseph Nypaver, Levin, Reese & Serbin, Altoona, for Samuel C. Hutchison.
John P. O’Dea, Stradley, Ronon, Stevens & Young, Philadelphia, for Cardinal John Krol and Arch-Diocese of Philadelphia.
L. Edward Glass, Johnstown, for Father Francis Luddy.
Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, ZAPPALA, PAPADAKOS and CAPPY, JJ., concurring.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
This appeal is dismissed as moot.
McDERMOTT, J., did not participate in the decision of this case.
NIX, C.J., files a concurring statement.