Case Name: Orville H. Smith, Respondent, v. Daniel Miller, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1920-12-07
Citations: 230 N.Y. 565
Docket Number: 
Parties: Orville H. Smith, Respondent, v. Daniel Miller, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 230
Pages: 565–565

Head Matter:
Orville H. Smith, Respondent, v. Daniel Miller, Appellant.
Trespass — removal of stone from premises — proof of title.
Smith v. Miller, 180 App. Div. 915, affirmed.
(Argued November 23, 1920;
decided December 7, 1920.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered October 17, 1917, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict. The action was for trespass, the complaint alleging that defendant had entered upon plaintiff’s premises and removed therefrom a quantity of stone. Defendant contended that plaintiff had failed to show sufficient title or possession of the premises to enable him to maintain the action.
Charles D. Newton, Attorney-General (John 0. Bates of counsel), for appellant.
William M. Gallagher for respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Hogan, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.