Case Name: HAMILTON v. OHIO CONTRACT PURCHASE CO.
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1927
Citations: 5 Ohio Law Abs. 760
Docket Number: 
Parties: HAMILTON v. OHIO CONTRACT PURCHASE CO.
Judges: (Shields and Young, JJ., concur.)
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 5
Pages: 760–761

Head Matter:
HAMILTON v. OHIO CONTRACT PURCHASE CO.
Ohio Appeals, 2nd Dist., Franklin Co.
Addison & Evans, Columbus, for Hamilton.
Turner, Calland & Summers, Columbus, for Purchase Co.

Opinion:
HOUCK, J.
1. Question whether note sued on was purchased in due course before due, for consideration, and without knowledge of any defects therein, are questions of fact, to be determined by jury.
2. Though evidence offered might cause •different minds to reach different conclusions, when jury has made ultimate findings on conflicting facts, reviewing court cannot reverse judgment as against manifest weight of evidence.
(Shields and Young, JJ., concur.)
For reference to full opinion, see Omnibus Index, last page, this issue.