Case Name: Derrick HUTCHINSON, Defendant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1993-11-23
Citations: 865 S.W.2d 445
Docket Number: No. 63585
Parties: Derrick HUTCHINSON, Defendant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 865
Pages: 445–445

Head Matter:
Derrick HUTCHINSON, Defendant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. 63585.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Nov. 23, 1993.
John Klosterman, St. Louis, for defendant/appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., F. Martin Dajani, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff/respondent.
Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no prece-dential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. Rule 84.16(b).