Case Name: MARCH et al. v. ROMARE et al.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1902-05-27
Citations: 116 F. 354
Docket Number: No. 1,154
Parties: MARCH et al. v. ROMARE et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter
Volume: 116
Pages: 354–355

Head Matter:
MARCH et al. v. ROMARE et al.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
May 27, 1902.)
No. 1,154.
1. Appealable Orders—Refusing Preliminary Injunction.
Since the passage of Act June 6, 1900 (31 Stat. 660), amending sec- . tion 7 of the act creating the circuit courts of appeals, there is no statute authorizing an appeal from an order refusing a preliminary injunction.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Alabama.
Jno. B. Knox and J. K. Dixon, for appellants.
J. J. Willett and B. F. Abbott, for appellees.
Before PARDEE, McCORMICK, and SHELBY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
McCORMICK, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from an interlocutory decree of the circuit court for the Northern district of Alabama (114 Fed. 201) in which it wa's "ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the prayer and motion for injunction be, and the same is hereby, overruled and denied this 19th day of February, 1902." The law in force at the time this interlocutory decree was- rendered and at this time does not authorize an appeal from such a decree. Act of congress approved June 6, 1900 (31 Stat. 1899, 1900) p. 660; Westinghouse Air Brake Co. v. Christensen Engineering Co., 44 C. C. A. 92, 104 Fed. 622; Wire Co. v. Boyce, 44 C. C. A. 588, 104 Fed. 172; Omaha & S. W. R. Co. v. Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co., 45 C. C. A. 474, 106 Fed. 586; Rowan v. Ide, 46 C. C. A. 214, 107 Fed. 161.
As this court has no. jurisdiction to entertain this appeal, the 'same must be dismissed, and it is so ordered.