Case Name: Dwight SHUH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-06-03
Citations: 598 So. 2d 334
Docket Number: No. 91-1872
Parties: Dwight SHUH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: LETTS and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 598
Pages: 334–334

Head Matter:
Dwight SHUH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 91-1872.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
June 3, 1992.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Debra Moses Stephens, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James J. Carney, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We reverse appellant's sentence and remand for resentencing and a rehearing on the suitability of imposing an adult sentence on the appellant. The trial court erred by failing to reduce to writing its decision to impose adult sanctions. E.g., Ford v. State, 576 So.2d 440 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); § 39.111(7)(d), Fla.Stat. (1989). Because they are now moot, we do not address the issues raised on appeal concerning the adequacy of the trial court's oral findings.
LETTS and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.
STONE, J., concurs specially with opinion.