Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paul E. PALMER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-03-09
Citations: 219 F. App'x 508
Docket Number: No. 06-2791
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paul E. PALMER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 219
Pages: 508–508

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paul E. PALMER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-2791.
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 18, 2007.
Decided March 9, 2007.
Timothy A. Bass, Office of the United States Attorney, Urbana Division, Urbana, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Paul E. Palmer, Forrest City, AR, pro se.
Before Hon. WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge, Hon. KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge, Hon. DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
The defendant in this case was convicted of one count of conspiracy and six counts of aiding and assisting in the filing of false income tax returns. On appeal, this court affirmed the convictions but acting on the agreement of the government, the court remanded the matter to the trial court for re-sentencing post-Booker. (United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005.)) The defendant now appeals the new sentence.
The defendant claimed that the reimpo-sition of the sentence itself was vindictive. The record fails to demonstrate this. The record further shows that the district court's restitution order credited the defendant appropriately for past and future payments of third parties and was not in error.
The claim of ex post facto clause violation borders on the frivolous. The defendant's argument that his rights to a speedy trial were violated was laid to the rest in the first appeal.
The sentence and judgment of the district court is summarily affirmed.