Case Name: Olin WOOTEN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert C. LIGHTBURN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-11-12
Citations: 350 F. App'x 812
Docket Number: No. 08-2279
Parties: Olin WOOTEN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert C. LIGHTBURN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 350
Pages: 812–812

Head Matter:
Olin WOOTEN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert C. LIGHTBURN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-2279.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 28, 2009.
Decided: Nov. 12, 2009.
C. Connor Crook, Boyle, Bain, Reback & Slayton, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellant. Daniel R. Bieger, Copeland & Bieger, P.C., Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Robert C. Lightburn appeals the district court's order entering judgment in Olin Wooten's favor on Wooten's specific performance and unjust enrichment claims against Lightburn. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. See Wooten v. Lightburn, 579 F.Supp.2d 769 (W.D.Va.2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.