Case Name: Stocks v. United States; Hallstrom et ux. v. Tillamook County; Smith v. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services; Hancock v. City of Davenport et al.; Taylor v. Green et al.; Rivera v. Oroweat Foods Co., Inc., et al.; Jungen, Administratrix of the Estate of Jungen, et al. v. Oregon; Marker et ux. v. Rieschel et al.; Gordon et al. v. Department of Water and Power of the City of Los Angeles; Sherman v. Nissan Motor Corp. et al.; Polyak v. Stack et al.; Brown et al. v. 1250 Twenty-Fourth Street Associates et al., In re Sparks, In re Marik, Harris v. Hall et al.; Herrera v. Redman, Warden; Stotts v. United States; Bertram v. United States; Hurd v. Dorsey, Warden; Magwood v. Alabama; Spychala v. Rushen et al.; Gallaway v. United States; Brown v. American Express Travel Related Services Co., Inc.; Olim v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. et al.; Brooks v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc.; Zarrilli v. Marino; May v. Challenger Communications Systems, Inc.; Gala v. United States Postal Service; Rondon v. Indiana; Lockhart v. Rolling et al.; Martin v. Delaware Law School of Widener University et al.; Sparks v. Sparks; Cordeiro v. United States; Watts v. Johnson, Warden, et al.; Bond v. Johnstone et al.
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1990-01-08
Citations: 493 U.S. 1037
Docket Number: No. 88-42; No. 88-2054; No. 88-2140; No. 88-7540; No. 88-7626; No. 89-90; No. 89-254; No. 89-294; No. 89-342; No. 89-365; No. 89-384; No. 89-494; No. 89-584; No. 89-5041; No. 89-5106; No. 89-5115; No. 89-5361; No. 89-5384; No. 89-5397; No. 89-5428; No. 89-5458; No. 89-5501; No. 89-5522; No. 89-5528; No. 89-5531; No. 89-5570; No. 89-5576; No. 89-5593; No. 89-5613; No. 89-5615; No. 89-5639; No. 89-5716; No. 89-5790; No. 89-5820
Parties: Stocks v. United States, Hallstrom et ux. v. Tillamook County, Smith v. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Hancock v. City of Davenport et al., Taylor v. Green et al., Rivera v. Oroweat Foods Co., Inc., et al., Jungen, Administratrix of the Estate of Jungen, et al. v. Oregon, Marker et ux. v. Rieschel et al., Gordon et al. v. Department of Water and Power of the City of Los Angeles, Sherman v. Nissan Motor Corp. et al., Polyak v. Stack et al., Brown et al. v. 1250 Twenty-Fourth Street Associates et al., In re Sparks, In re Marik, Harris v. Hall et al., Herrera v. Redman, Warden, Stotts v. United States, Bertram v. United States, Hurd v. Dorsey, Warden, Magwood v. Alabama, Spychala v. Rushen et al., Gallaway v. United States, Brown v. American Express Travel Related Services Co., Inc., Olim v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. et al., Brooks v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc., Zarrilli v. Marino, May v. Challenger Communications Systems, Inc., Gala v. United States Postal Service, Rondon v. Indiana, Lockhart v. Rolling et al., Martin v. Delaware Law School of Widener University et al., Sparks v. Sparks, Cordeiro v. United States, Watts v. Johnson, Warden, et al., Bond v. Johnstone et al.,
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 493
Pages: 1037–1038

Head Matter:
No.-.
No. 88-42.
No. 88-2054.
No. 88-2140.
No. 88-7540.
No. 88-7626.
No. 89-90.
No. 89-254.
No. 89-294.
No. 89-342.
No. 89-365.
No. 89-384.
No. 89-494.
No. 89-584.
No. 89-5041.
No. 89-5106.
No. 89-5115.
No. 89-5361.
No. 89-5384.
No. 89-5397.
No. 89-5428.
Stocks v. United States, Hallstrom et ux. v. Tillamook County, Smith v. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Hancock v. City of Davenport et al., Taylor v. Green et al., Rivera v. Oroweat Foods Co., Inc., et al., Jungen, Administratrix of the Estate of Jungen, et al. v. Oregon, Marker et ux. v. Rieschel et al., Gordon et al. v. Department of Water and Power of the City of Los Angeles, Sherman v. Nissan Motor Corp. et al., Polyak v. Stack et al., Brown et al. v. 1250 Twenty-Fourth Street Associates et al., In re Sparks, In re Marik, Harris v. Hall et al., Herrera v. Redman, Warden, Stotts v. United States, Bertram v. United States, Hurd v. Dorsey, Warden, Magwood v. Alabama, Spychala v. Rushen et al., Gallaway v. United States, Brown v. American Express Travel Related Services Co., Inc., Olim v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. et al., Brooks v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc., Zarrilli v. Marino, May v. Challenger Communications Systems, Inc., Gala v. United States Postal Service, Rondon v. Indiana, Lockhart v. Rolling et al., Martin v. Delaware Law School of Widener University et al., Sparks v. Sparks, Cordeiro v. United States, Watts v. Johnson, Warden, et al., Bond v. Johnstone et al.,

Opinion:
ante, p. 948;
ante, p. 20;
ante, p. 821;
ante, p. 826;
ante, p. 841;
ante, p. 963;
ante, p. 933;
ante, p. 893;
ante, p. 918;
ante, p. 954;
ante, p. 944;
ante, p. 935;
ante, p. 963;
ante, p. 953;
ante, p. 857;
ante, p. 945;
ante, p. 861;
ante, p. 956;
ante, p. 897;
ante, p. 923;
ante, p. 939;
No. 89-5458.
No. 89-5501.
No. 89-5522.
No. 89-5528.
No. 89-5531.
No. 89-5570.
No. 89-5576.
No. 89-5593.
No. 89-5613.
No. 89-5615.
No. 89-5639.
No. 89-5716.
No. 89-5790.
No. 89-5820.
ante, p. 898;
ante, p. 899;
ante, p. 940;
ante, p. 940;
ante, p. 941;
ante, p. 942;
ante, p. 942;
ante, p. 969;
ante, p. 942;
ante, p. 966;
ante, p. 957;
ante, p. 958;
ante, p. 982; and
ante, p. 996. Petitions for rehearing denied.