Case Name: Herzfeld & Stern, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Warren Beck, Defendant. (Action No. 1.); Warren Beck, Appellant, v. Herzfeld & Stern, Inc., Respondent. (Action No. 2.)
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1993-10-14
Citations: 82 N.Y.2d 789
Docket Number: 
Parties: Herzfeld & Stern, Inc., Plaintiff, v Warren Beck, Defendant. (Action No. 1.) Warren Beck, Appellant, v Herzfeld & Stern, Inc., Respondent. (Action No. 2.)
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 82
Pages: 789–790

Head Matter:
Herzfeld & Stern, Inc., Plaintiff, v Warren Beck, Defendant. (Action No. 1.) Warren Beck, Appellant, v Herzfeld & Stern, Inc., Respondent. (Action No. 2.)
Submitted July 26, 1993;
decided October 14, 1993

Opinion:
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the Appellate Division order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution and that the "so ordered" stipulation does not qualify as a final judgment because it was entered into "without prejudice."
Judge Smith taking no part.