Case Name: Mac W. STUART, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-03-01
Citations: 751 So. 2d 752
Docket Number: No. 3D99-2069
Parties: Mac W. STUART, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J. and GREEN and FLETCHER, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 751
Pages: 752–752

Head Matter:
Mac W. STUART, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D99-2069.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 1, 2000.
Mac. W. Stuart, in proper person.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Linda S. Katz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J. and GREEN and FLETCHER, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellant appeals his sentence for robbery with a deadly weapon claiming that his sentence is illegal because it was based on the 1995 sentencing guidelines, chapter 95-184, Laws of Florida (1995), which violates the single subject rule contained in article III, section 6, Florida Constitution. Based on the Florida Supreme Court's recent pronouncement in Heggs v. State, No. SC93851, — So. 2d —, 2000 WL 178052 (Fla. Feb.17, 2000), wherein the court held that chapter 95-184 does violate the single subject rule, we remand this case for resentencing in accordance with the valid laws in effect at the time that the appellant committed his offense.
Remanded for resentencing.