Case Name: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Geron
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1987-08-19
Citations: 32 Ohio St. 3d 134
Docket Number: D.D. No. 86-33
Parties: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Geron.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 32
Pages: 134–136

Head Matter:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Geron.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Geron (1987), 32 Ohio St. 3d 134.]
(D.D. No. 86-33
Decided August 19, 1987.)
J. Warren Bettis, disciplinary counsel, Karen B. Hull and Mark H. Aultman, for relator.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Having reviewed the record, the findings of fact, and conclusions of the board, this court determines that there are sufficient facts to justify the finding that Terry A. Geron did in fact violate DR 6-101(A)(3), 7-101(A)(2), 7-101(A)(3), 1-102(A)(4), and 1-102(A)(6), and Gov. Bar R. VI(6).
Further, the disciplinary proceedings in both Indiana and Kentucky may be relied upon as further evidence of respondent's unfitness to practice law. See Disciplinary Counsel v. Nothstein (1986), 21 Ohio St. 3d 108, 21 OBR 400, 488 N.E. 2d 180.
We concur in the recommendation of the board, and hereby indefinitely suspend respondent from the practice of law. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.