Case Name: FIZZANO BROTHERS CONCRETE PRODUCTS, INC. v. XLN, INC., Successor in Interest to System Development Group, Inc. v. Shore Consultants, Ltd., Gregg A. Montgomery, David Binder and XLNT Software Solutions, Inc. Petition of Fizzano Brothers Concrete Products, Inc.
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2010-05-19
Citations: 606 Pa. 48
Docket Number: No. 390 MAL 2009
Parties: FIZZANO BROTHERS CONCRETE PRODUCTS, INC. v. XLN, INC., Successor in Interest to System Development Group, Inc. v. Shore Consultants, Ltd., Gregg A. Montgomery, David Binder and XLNT Software Solutions, Inc. Petition of Fizzano Brothers Concrete Products, Inc.
Judges: 
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 606
Pages: 48–48

Head Matter:
994 A.2d 1081
FIZZANO BROTHERS CONCRETE PRODUCTS, INC. v. XLN, INC., Successor in Interest to System Development Group, Inc. v. Shore Consultants, Ltd., Gregg A. Montgomery, David Binder and XLNT Software Solutions, Inc. Petition of Fizzano Brothers Concrete Products, Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
May 19, 2010.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 19th day of MAY, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED limited to the following issues:
1. Does the defacto merger doctrine always require proof of continuity of ownership?
2. Did the Superior Court improperly substitute its own fact-finding for that of the trial court?