Case Name: Anna M. CHARRY, Appellant, v. In re: Mariana TORRES v. Alexis Gonzalez, Appellee.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2019-01-23
Citations: 263 So. 3d 238
Docket Number: No. 3D18-1014
Parties: Anna M. CHARRY, Appellant,
v.
In re: Mariana TORRES v. Alexis Gonzalez, Appellee.
Judges: Before LOGUE and SCALES, JJ., and LUCK, Associate Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 263
Pages: 238–238

Head Matter:
Anna M. CHARRY, Appellant,
v.
In re: Mariana TORRES v. Alexis Gonzalez, Appellee.
No. 3D18-1014
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Opinion filed January 23, 2019
Todd Ostegard, for appellant.
Kula & Associates, P.A., and Elliot B. Kula and Ashley P. Singrossi, for appellee Mariana Torres.
Before LOGUE and SCALES, JJ., and LUCK, Associate Judge.

Opinion:
LOGUE, J.
Appellant seeks review of the trial court's order denying her motion to intervene following a hearing. We review the denial of the motion to intervene for an abuse of discretion. See Abujasen v. Dreke, 118 So.3d 235, 235 n.1 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) (citing Barnhill v. Fla. Microsoft Anti-Trust Litig., 905 So.2d 195, 199 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) ("The standard of review of an order on a motion to intervene is abuse of discretion.") ). Although a hearing was held on Appellant's motion, there is no transcript of the hearing. Under the circumstances of this case, in the absence of a transcript, we cannot reasonably conclude that the trial court abused its discretion, and therefore, we affirm. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) ; Shojaie v. Gables Court Prof'l Ctr., Inc., 974 So.2d 1140, 1141-42 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).
Affirmed.