Case Name: Fredrick Carpentino v. Perkins Trucking Company et al.
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1989-03-28
Citations: 18 Conn. App. 810
Docket Number: 6964
Parties: Fredrick Carpentino v. Perkins Trucking Company et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Appellate Reports
Volume: 18
Pages: 810–811

Head Matter:
Fredrick Carpentino v. Perkins Trucking Company et al.
(6964)
Spallone, O’Connell and Foti, Js.
Argued March 16
decision released March 28, 1989
Michael J. McClary, with whom, on the brief, were HughF. Keefe, JohnJ. Keefe, Jr., and CharlesE. Tier-nan III, for the appellant (named defendant et al.).
Gregory P. Patti, for the appellee (defendant Michigan Mutual Insurance Company).
Colette Mauborgne, with whom, on the brief, was Kevin J. Maher, for the appellee (defendant Chubb Group of Insurance Companies).
Jason M. Dodge, for the appellee (defendant Travelers Insurance Company).
EdwardS. Downes, Jr., for the appellee (defendant Kemper Insurance Company).
Carl J. Schuman, assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, were Clarine Nardi Riddle, acting attorney general, Joseph I. Lieberman, former attorney general, and CarlJ. Schuman, assistant attorney general, for the appellee (defendant Second Injury and Compensation Assurance Fund).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
In this appeal, the defendant employer and its insurer have attacked the factual findings of the workers' compensation commission as affirmed by the compensation review division. We cannot intervene, where, as in this case, such findings are amply supported by the evidence.
There is no error.