Case Name: Gerald R. BYRD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BP AMOCO POLYMERS, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Movant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-05-23
Citations: 10 F. App'x 162
Docket Number: No. 01-1138
Parties: Gerald R. BYRD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BP AMOCO POLYMERS, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Movant.
Judges: Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 10
Pages: 162–162

Head Matter:
Gerald R. BYRD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BP AMOCO POLYMERS, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Movant.
No. 01-1138.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 17, 2001.
Decided May 23, 2001.
Gerald R. Byrd, pro se. Ingrid Black-welder Erwin, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, Greenville, SC, for appellee.
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Gerald R. Byrd appeals the district court's order of summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Byrd v. BP Amoco Polymers, No. CA-99-3649-6-13AK (D.S.C. Jan. 19, 2001). We deny Byrd's motion for production of documents and motion to compel delivery of documents. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.