Case Name: D. B. BELL, Jr., Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1966-10-19
Citations: 191 So. 2d 49
Docket Number: No. 35010
Parties: D. B. BELL, Jr., Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 191
Pages: 49–50

Head Matter:
D. B. BELL, Jr., Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 35010.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Oct. 19, 1966.
For opinion of District Court of Appeal see 179 So.2d 377.
Robert L. Koeppel and Phillip A. Hub-bart, Miami, for petitioner.
Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Arden M. Siegendorf, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the jurisdictional conflict does not appear. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW, O'CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.