Case Name: Wilson v. Hill, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1926-05-10
Citations: 286 Pa. 318
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 174
Parties: Wilson v. Hill, Appellant.
Judges: Before Moschzisker, C. J., Frazer, "Walling, Simpson, Kephart, Sadler and SOHAEEBR, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 286
Pages: 318–318

Head Matter:
Wilson v. Hill, Appellant.
Argued April 20, 1926.
Before Moschzisker, C. J., Frazer, "Walling, Simpson, Kephart, Sadler and SOHAEEBR, JJ.
F. Carroll Fow, for appellant.
Robert M. Bernstein, with Mm Thomas E. Brehoney, for appellee.
May 10, 1926:

Opinion:
Per Curiam,
Plaintiff was seriously injured through negligence of defendant; he recovered a verdict for $5,000, on which, after its reduction to $4,000, the court below entered judgment. Defendant has appealed and contends only that the verdict is so excessive that we should reverse the court below for not granting a new trial. After reading the evidence on the question involved, we are not convinced of reversible error.
The judgment is affirmed.