Case Name: ISADOR F. MORRIS, Respondent, v. A. F. HARTLEY et al., Defendants; F. J. BETHEL, Appellant
Court: Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1914-11-30
Citations: 26 Cal. App. 804
Docket Number: Civ. No. 1271
Parties: ISADOR F. MORRIS, Respondent, v. A. F. HARTLEY et al., Defendants; F. J. BETHEL, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports
Volume: 26
Pages: 804–804

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 1271.
Third Appellate District.
November 30, 1914.]
ISADOR F. MORRIS, Respondent, v. A. F. HARTLEY et al., Defendants; F. J. BETHEL, Appellant.
Mortgage — Vendor and Vendee— Foreclosure—Redemption.—Order denying a motion for a new trial affirmed cm the authority of Morris v. Hartley, ante, p. 61.
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Sacramento County refusing a new trial. P. J. Shields, Judge.
The facts are stated in the opinion in Morris v. Hartley, ante, p. 61.
James D. Meredith, Meredith & Landis, and P. H. Johnson, for Appellant.
M. S. Wahrhaftig, for Respondent.

Opinion:
CHIPMAN, P. J.
This is an appeal from the order denying defendant Bethel's motion for a new trial and, by stipulation, was presented in the briefs filed in the appeal from the judgment, No. 1116, this day decided. For the reasons therein presented, the order is affirmed.
Hart, J., and Burnett, J., concurred.
A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the district court of appeal on December 31, 1914, in an opinion reported in connection with the opinion in Morris v. Hartley (Civ. No. 1116), ante, p. 61. [146 Pac. 73].