Case Name: Dwaine WOODSON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2004-12-16
Citations: 889 So. 2d 823
Docket Number: No. SC04-56
Parties: Dwaine WOODSON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: PARIENTE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 889
Pages: 823–824

Head Matter:
Dwaine WOODSON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. SC04-56.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Dec. 16, 2004.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender and A.S. Rogers, Assistant Public Defender, Seventh Judicial Circuit, Daytona Beach, FL, for Petitioner.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, Pamela J. Roller and Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorneys General, Daytona Beach, FL, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We originally accepted review of Woodson v. State, 864 So.2d 512 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004), in which the Fifth District Court of Appeal certified conflict with the Second District's decision in Young v. State, 566 So.2d 69 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). See Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. Upon closer inspection of these two cases, we have determined that no genuine conflict exists between them because they are factually and legally distinguishable.
Accordingly, this case is hereby dismissed.
It is so ordered.
PARIENTE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.
PARIENTE, C.J., concurs with an opinion, in which BELL, J., concurs.