Case Name: Midwest Financial Acceptance Corporation, as Successor in Interest to Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A., Formerly Known as Chase Lincoln First Bank, N. A., Appellant, v. Mark J. Gonsenhauser, Respondent, et al., Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1999-12-30
Citations: 267 A.D.2d 983
Docket Number: 
Parties: Midwest Financial Acceptance Corporation, as Successor in Interest to Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A., Formerly Known as Chase Lincoln First Bank, N. A., Appellant, v Mark J. Gonsenhauser, Respondent, et al., Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 267
Pages: 983–983

Head Matter:
Midwest Financial Acceptance Corporation, as Successor in Interest to Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A., Formerly Known as Chase Lincoln First Bank, N. A., Appellant, v Mark J. Gonsenhauser, Respondent, et al., Defendants.
[700 NYS2d 887]

Opinion:
—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motions granted. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying plaintiffs motions to amend the judgment of foreclosure and sale nunc pro tunc to grant a deficiency judgment, which had been inadvertently omitted. Mark J. Gonsenhauser (defendant) had notice of plaintiffs application for a deficiency judgment and stipulated that such judgment be granted. Therefore, no prejudice to defendant could be shown (see, Pines at Setauket v Retirement Mgt. Group, 246 AD2d 528, 530; Poughkeepsie Sav. Bank v Maplewood Land Dev. Co., 210 AD2d 606, 608). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Bergin, J. — Amend Judgment.) Present— Green, J. P., Lawton, Wisner, Scudder and Balio, JJ.