Case Name: CITY OF UPPER ARLINGTON, Plaintiff, v. LIMBERT, Defendant
Court: Franklin County Municipal Court
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2006-08-24
Citations: 138 Ohio Misc. 2d 30
Docket Number: No. 2005 TRD 130447
Parties: CITY OF UPPER ARLINGTON, Plaintiff, v. LIMBERT, Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Ohio Miscellaneous Reports, Second Series
Volume: 138
Pages: 30–31

Head Matter:
CITY OF UPPER ARLINGTON, Plaintiff, v. LIMBERT, Defendant.
2005-Ohio-7159.]
Franklin County Municipal Court.
No. 2005 TRD 130447.
Decided Aug. 24, 2006.
Jeanine Amid Hummer, Upper Arlington City Attorney, for plaintiff.
James D. Limbert, pro se.

Opinion:
Barrows, Judge.
{¶ 1} This matter came on for trial on April 18, 2005. The city of Upper Arlington was represented by the city attorney, Jeanine Amid Hummer. The defendant represented himself. A court reporter was present to record the testimony of the witnesses.
{¶ 2} The court heard testimony from William Brisbane, who was duly qualified as an expert witness in the operation of the Ultralyte LTI 20/20 laser speed detector.
{¶ 3} Based upon the testimony presented and the exhibits admitted at trial, the court found the defendant guilty of the charge of speeding and sentenced the defendant accordingly.
{¶ 4} This trial was the first opportunity for the court to hear testimony regarding the scientific principles that support the use of the laser as a device to measure speed. For this reason, the court makes the following finding of fact regarding the use of the laser speed detector.
Findings of Fact
{¶ 5} 1. The laser speed detector is reliable and accurate as a scientific measure of the speed of a moving object and can be used by law enforcement personnel to measure vehicle speed provided that the device is used in accordance with certain procedures delineated by the manufacturer. Specifically, the court finds that the following procedures must be employed in order for the laser speed device to accurately measure a vehicle's speed, (a) The laser must be pointed so that the red dot on the scope is aligned with a reflective area (such as a license plate) on the target vehicle, (b) The target vehicle must be moving either directly toward or away from the laser or at no more than a slight angle. If the vehicle is moving at an angle from the laser, the device will measure relative speed as a result of the "cosign effect." This measure of speed is always less than the true speed, (c) The laser must be properly calibrated prior to use. Calibration must include a self-test done by the instrument internally and a measurement at distance conducted on a test range. The distance test must be conducted on the test range prior to use of the device before each shift. In this test, the laser measures a known distance.
{¶ 6} If all of the above listed conditions and procedures are applied, the court finds that the Ultralyte LTI 20/20 laser speed detector is an accurate and scientifically reliable measure of speed with a margin of error within minus-two to plus one miles per hour of the actual speed of the object, provided that the object is at least 30 feet from the laser.