Case Name: James A. HUNT, Respondent, v. Eli WHITT, Havatampa Cigar Company and The Insurance Company of North America, Appellants
Court: Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jurisdiction: South Carolina
Decision Date: 1983-08-25
Citations: 279 S.C. 343
Docket Number: 21980
Parties: James A. HUNT, Respondent, v. Eli WHITT, Havatampa Cigar Company and The Insurance Company of North America, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Carolina Reports
Volume: 279
Pages: 343–344

Head Matter:
21980
James A. HUNT, Respondent, v. Eli WHITT, Havatampa Cigar Company and The Insurance Company of North America, Appellants.
(306 S. E. (2d) 621)
Love, Thornton, Arnold & Thomason, Greenville, for appellants.
Law Offices of John Bolt Culbertson, Greenville, for respondent.
August 25, 1983.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
This is a Worker's Compensation case here on appeal by the employer from an order of the circuit court reversing and remanding the case to the Hearing Commissioner for the purpose of taking additional medical testimony from the claimant. Because the interlocutory order of the circuit court does not involve the merits of the action, it is not reviewable by this Court for lack of finality. King v. The Singer Company, Power Tool Division, 276 S. C. 419, 279 S. E. (2d) 367 (1981). To the extent that the following cases and any others not cited can be construed to authorize appeals under the present circumstances, those cases are overruled. Couch v. Greenville County, 249 S. C. 186, 153 S. E. (2d) 394 (1967); Amick v. City of Columbia, 247 S. C. 254, 146 S. E. (2d) 860 (1966); Drake v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., 241 S. C. 116, 127 S. E. (2d) 288 (1962).
The appeal is dismissed without prejudice. See Gunnells v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., 261 S. C. 106, 198 S. E. (2d) 535 (1973).