Case Name: Sandra SEEGARS, et al., Appellants v. Alberto GONZALES, Attorney General of the United States and Anthony A. Williams, Mayor, District of Columbia, Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-06-21
Citations: 413 F.3d 1
Docket Number: Nos. 04-5016, 04-5081
Parties: Sandra SEEGARS, et al., Appellants v. Alberto GONZALES, Attorney General of the United States and Anthony A. Williams, Mayor, District of Columbia, Appellees.
Judges: Before: GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and EDWARDS, SENTELLE, HENDERSON, RANDOLPH, ROGERS, TATEL, GARLAND, and ROBERTS, Circuit Judges, and WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 413
Pages: 1–3

Head Matter:
Sandra SEEGARS, et al., Appellants v. Alberto GONZALES, Attorney General of the United States and Anthony A. Williams, Mayor, District of Columbia, Appellees.
Nos. 04-5016, 04-5081.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
June 21, 2005.
Stephen Porter Halbrook, Law Office of Stephen P. Halbrook, Richard E. Gard-iner, Law Office of Richard E. Gardiner, Fairfax, VA, for Appellants.
Richard E. Gardiner, Kenneth L. Wain-stein, U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Peter Douglas Keisler, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Lutz Alexander Prager, Edward Eugene Schwab, Dep Atty Gen, Robert James Spagnoletti, Attorney General, for Appel-lees.
Before: GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and EDWARDS, SENTELLE, HENDERSON, RANDOLPH, ROGERS, TATEL, GARLAND, and ROBERTS, Circuit Judges, and WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Circuit Judges SENTELLE, RANDOLPH, and ROBERTS would grant the petition for rehearing en banc.
A statement of Chief Judge GINSBURG concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc is attached.
A statement of Circuit Judge SENTELLE dissenting in the denial of rehearing en banc is attached.
A statement of Senior Circuit Judge WILLIAMS is attached. '
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellants' petition for rehearing en banc and the responses thereto have been circulated to the full court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular, active service did not vote in favor of the petition. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is '
ORDERED that the petition be denied.