Case Name: CAPRICORN MARBLE COMPANY, Appellant, v. GEORGE HYMAN CONSTRUCTION CO., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1985-02-06
Citations: 462 So. 2d 1208
Docket Number: No. 84-142
Parties: CAPRICORN MARBLE COMPANY, Appellant, v. GEORGE HYMAN CONSTRUCTION CO., Appellee.
Judges: LETTS and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 462
Pages: 1208–1210

Head Matter:
CAPRICORN MARBLE COMPANY, Appellant, v. GEORGE HYMAN CONSTRUCTION CO., Appellee.
No. 84-142.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb. 6, 1985.
Esther A. Zaretsky, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Michele R. Benvenisty of Rosenberg, Reisman & Glass, Miami, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We do not have jurisdiction over this appeal of a non-final order as it is not authorized under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130, or otherwise.
Further, it does not qualify for cer-tiorari treatment as it does not appear that there has been a departure from the essential requirements of law or that appellant will not have a full and adequate remedy by plenary appeal.
While perhaps tempted to address the merits, we cannot do so because it is a fundamental principle of law that if a court is without jurisdiction, it has no power to adjudicate or determine any issue or cause submitted to it. See 13 Fla.Jur.2d, Courts and Judges, § 22-31.
Appeal dismissed.
LETTS and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
GLICKSTEIN, J., concurs specially with opinion.