Case Name: John TENNISON; Antoine Goff, Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; San Francisco Police Department; Prentice Earl Sanders; Napoleon Hendrix, Defendants, and George Butterworth, Defendant- Appellant; John Tennison; Antoine Goff, Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. City and County of San Francisco; San Francisco Police Department; George Butterworth, Defendants, and Prentice Earl Sanders; Napoleon Hendrix, Defendants- Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-09-22
Citations: 294 F. App'x 285
Docket Number: Nos. 06-15260, 06-15426
Parties: John TENNISON; Antoine Goff, Plaintiffs — Appellees, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; San Francisco Police Department; Prentice Earl Sanders; Napoleon Hendrix, Defendants, and George Butterworth, Defendant— Appellant. John Tennison; Antoine Goff, Plaintiffs — Appellees, v. City and County of San Francisco; San Francisco Police Department; George Butterworth, Defendants, and Prentice Earl Sanders; Napoleon Hendrix, Defendants— Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 294
Pages: 285–285

Head Matter:
John TENNISON; Antoine Goff, Plaintiffs — Appellees, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; San Francisco Police Department; Prentice Earl Sanders; Napoleon Hendrix, Defendants, and George Butterworth, Defendant— Appellant. John Tennison; Antoine Goff, Plaintiffs — Appellees, v. City and County of San Francisco; San Francisco Police Department; George Butterworth, Defendants, and Prentice Earl Sanders; Napoleon Hendrix, Defendants— Appellants.
Nos. 06-15260, 06-15426.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted June 12, 2007.
Filed Sept. 22, 2008.
Ethan A. Balogh, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, Elliot R. Peters, Esq., Keker & Van Nest, LLP, Randolph Daar, Esq., Serra, Lichter, Daar, Bustamante, Gilg & Greenberger, Pier, Five, North, John Houston Scott, Esq., The Scott Law Firm, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.
Christine Van Aken, Esq., Office of the City Attorney, San Francisco, CA for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: HAWKINS, TASHIMA, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
Appellee Antoine Goffs Motion to Dismiss Claim Against George Butterworth, for Entry of Judgment in Butterworth's Favor, and for Resubmission of Pending Appeals is GRANTED.
These cases are resubmitted for decision as of the filed date of this Order.
Butterworth's appeal is dismissed and his case is remanded to the district court for the limited purpose of entering judgment in Goffs lawsuit against Butterworth in Butterworth's favor. No costs.