Case Name: William VERRINDER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WAL-MART CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-01-27
Citations: 552 F. App'x 277
Docket Number: No. 13-2356
Parties: William VERRINDER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WAL-MART CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 552
Pages: 277–278

Head Matter:
William VERRINDER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WAL-MART CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 13-2356.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 23, 2014.
Decided: Jan. 27, 2014.
William Verrinder, Appellant Pro Se. Julie Kerr Adams, LITTLER MENDEL-SON PC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
William Verrinder appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his complaint for wrongful termination and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Verrinder v. Wal-Mart Corp., No. l:13-cv-00395-TDS-LPA (M.D.N.C. Aug. 2 & Nov. 4, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.