Case Name: Frank KNIGHT, Petitioner, v. Norman EDWARDS, Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1973-04-25
Citations: 276 So. 2d 499
Docket Number: No. 72-1225
Parties: Frank KNIGHT, Petitioner, v. Norman EDWARDS, Respondent.
Judges: REED, C. J., and WALDEN and MA-GER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 276
Pages: 499–499

Head Matter:
Frank KNIGHT, Petitioner, v. Norman EDWARDS, Respondent.
No. 72-1225.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
April 25, 1973.
Rollo E. Karkeet, Miami, for petitioner.
Sherman A. Katz, Koenig & Katz, Hollywood, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner was aggrieved by an interlocutory decision in a civil action such as was formally cognizable in equity and brought his petition for writ of certiorari under Rule 4.5(c), Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A. Petitioner misconceived his appellate remedy, the proper answer being an interlocutory appeal, under Rule 4.2, Florida Appellate Rules. We are not permitted to transpose and treat his petition as an appeal. Bartow Growers Processing Corp. v. Florida Growers Processing Cooperative, Fla.1954, 71 So.2d 165; Schneider v. Manheimer, Fla.App.1964, 170 So.2d 75. Sapp v. La Violette, Fla.App.1970, 242 So.2d 483. See generally Florida Civil Practice After Trial, § 17.17, et seq.
Dismissed.
REED, C. J., and WALDEN and MA-GER, JJ., concur.