Case Name: CHIMENTI, Respondent, v. CHIMENTI, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1972-03-30
Citations: 8 Or. App. 570
Docket Number: No. D-2855
Parties: CHIMENTI, Respondent, v. CHIMENTI, Appellant.
Judges: Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Langtry and Foley, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 8
Pages: 570–570

Head Matter:
Argued February 24,
affirmed March 30, 1972
CHIMENTI, Respondent, v. CHIMENTI, Appellant.
(No. D-2855)
494 P2d 904
Harry F. Samuels, Portland, argned the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Vergeer, Samuels, Eoehr & Sweek, Portland.
DeMar L. Batchelor, Hillsboro, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Schwenn, Bradley, Batchelor & Bailey, Hillsboro.
Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Langtry and Foley, Judges.

Opinion:
PEE CUEIAM.
This is an appeal from only that portion of a divorce decree which made division of the property between the parties. We have examined the record in our de novo review and conclude that a recitation of the facts of the property division will serve no purpose. It is sufficient to say we cannot disagree with the division made by the trial court.
Affirmed.