Case Name: William S. SMITH and Roxanne Smith, Respondents, v. Gregory O'TOOLE, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-01-14
Citations: 93 S.W.3d 854
Docket Number: No. ED 80423
Parties: William S. SMITH and Roxanne Smith, Respondents, v. Gregory O’TOOLE, Appellant.
Judges: Before PAUL J. SIMON, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 93
Pages: 854–855

Head Matter:
William S. SMITH and Roxanne Smith, Respondents, v. Gregory O’TOOLE, Appellant.
No. ED 80423.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Jan. 14, 2003.
William F. Whealen, Jr., Miller & Stee-no, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Frank Carretero, Frank J. Carretero, L.L.C., St. Louis, MO, for respondents.
Before PAUL J. SIMON, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Gregory O'Toole, ("appellant") appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County finding him liable to respondents, William S. Smith and Roxanne Smith ("respondents") in the amount of $5,845.72. Respondents filed a cause of action against appellant for breach of contract and unjust enrichment in regards to the replacement of a septic system. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and conclude the judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).