Case Name: IN THE MATTER OF STUART D. FELSON, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 014521993)
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 2007-01-25
Citations: 189 N.J. 199
Docket Number: 
Parties: IN THE MATTER OF STUART D. FELSON, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 014521993).
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 189
Pages: 199–200

Head Matter:
914 A.2d 832
IN THE MATTER OF STUART D. FELSON, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 014521993).
January 25, 2007.

Opinion:
ORDER
The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 06-249, concluding that as a matter of final discipline pursuant to Rule l:20-13(c), STUART D. FELSON of RANDOLPH, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1993, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months for violating RPC 8.4(b)(commission of a criminal act that reflects adversely on honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer), and good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that STUART D. FELSON is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months and until the further Order of the Court, effective February 24, 2007; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys; and it is further
ORDERED that pursuant to Rule l:20-20(c), respondent's failure to comply with the Affidavit of Compliance requirement of Rule l:20-20(b)(15) may (1) preclude the Disciplinary Review Board from considering respondent's petition for reinstatement for a period of up to six months from the date respondent files proof of compliance; (2) be found to constitute a violation of RPC 8.1(b) and RPC 8.4(c); and (3) provide a basis for an action for contempt pursuant to Rule 1:10-2; and it is further
ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.