Case Name: JOSEPH BURSTINER ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. THE CITY OF EAST ORANGE ET AL., RESPONDENTS
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1926-10-18
Citations: 103 N.J.L. 174
Docket Number: 
Parties: JOSEPH BURSTINER ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. THE CITY OF EAST ORANGE ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 103
Pages: 174–174

Head Matter:
JOSEPH BURSTINER ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. THE CITY OF EAST ORANGE ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Submitted May 28, 1926
Decided October 18, 1926.
For the appellants, Aaron Marder.
For the respondents, Walter C. Ellis.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Bus-kirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 12.
For reversal — Hone.