Case Name: ALEXANDER F. SCHAACK ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. J. A. HOLMES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ET AL., APPELLANTS
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1933-01-05
Citations: 110 N.J.L. 16
Docket Number: 
Parties: ALEXANDER F. SCHAACK ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. J. A. HOLMES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ET AL., APPELLANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 110
Pages: 16–16

Head Matter:
ALEXANDER F. SCHAACK ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. J. A. HOLMES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ET AL., APPELLANTS.
Argued October 24, 1932
Decided January 5, 1933.
Por the respondents, Chandless_, Weller & Selser.
Por the appellants, Machay & Machay.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court, and printed in 10 N. J. Mis. R. 226.
For affirmance — Trenchard, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Brogan, Heher, Van Buskiek, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.