Case Name: BURKHALTER v. WEBB
Court: Texas Courts of Civil Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1919-02-13
Citations: 209 S.W. 216
Docket Number: No. 928
Parties: BURKHALTER v. WEBB.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 209
Pages: 216–216

Head Matter:
BURKHALTER v. WEBB.
(No. 928.)
(Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. El Paso.
Feb. 13, 1919.)
Appeal and Error <&wkey;1133 — Sufficiency of Record — Failure to File Brief.
Where there was no motion for new trial or assignment of error appearing in the record, and there was no brief filed by either party, and no motion filed in Court of Civil Appeals to dismiss appeal for want of prosecution, the case will he affirmed.
Appeal from El Paso County Court at Law; W. P. Brady, Judge.
Action by John R. Webb against Dan W. Burkhalter. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
Affirmed.
D. W. Burkhalter, of El Paso, for appellant.
J. H. Peden, of El Paso, for appellee.

Opinion:
WALTHALL, J.
In this case, appellee sued appellant on a promissory note for $500, interest, and attorney's fees, provided in the note, and secured by chattel mortgage. The only defense made was an agreement to extend the time of payment and a small amount paid to be credited on the note.
The case was tried without jury, and judgment entered for appellee, with foreclosure of the chattel mortgage. The' court filed findings of fact and conclusions of law. There is no motion for a new trial, or assignment of error appearing in the record, nor is there a brief filed by either party. No motion has been filed in this court to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.
The case is affirmed.