Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. CAROL ANN TULL, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1992-10-14
Citations: 115 Or. App. 577
Docket Number: 90C-21213; CA A69389
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. CAROL ANN TULL, Appellant.
Judges: Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 115
Pages: 577–578

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted June 29,
affirmed October 14, 1992
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. CAROL ANN TULL, Appellant.
(90C-21213; CA A69389)
839 P2d 249
Jesse Wm. Barton, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem.
Harrison Latto, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.
Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Affirmed. State v. Dummitt, 115 Or App 487, 839 P2d 246 (1992).
Edmonds, J., dissenting.