Case Name: William E. Hunt vs. M. F. Hunt et al.
Court: New Jersey Court of Chancery
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1855-02
Citations: 10 N.J. Eq. 315
Docket Number: 
Parties: William E. Hunt vs. M. F. Hunt et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 10
Pages: 315–319

Head Matter:
William E. Hunt vs. M. F. Hunt et al.
A testator gives and bequeaths all his property in trust for the payment of certain annuities and legacies, and then says, “ And to my two aforesaid daughters I give and bequeath the residue of all my estates, real and personal.
Held, that the legal title to the residue passed by the will to the daughters. That the annuities and legacies were a charge upon the estate, but when they were satisfied the estate was discharged of all trusts.
W. L. Dayton, for complainant.
E. H. Grandin, for defendants.

Opinion:
The Chancellor.
The testator, by his will, disposes of his estate as follows: I give and bequeath to Col. Thomas Cadwalader and Philemon Dickinson, both residents of Trenton and its vicinity, and of the county of Mercer, all my property, real and personal, in trust for the following purposes : First to pay all my debts as soon as convenient; second, to allow my housekeeper, Ann Drake, twenty-four dollars yearly, during her natural life, payable half-yearly, and one quarter's wages in advance immediately after my decease — also my other hired dometics ten dollars who shall be with me at the aforesaid time. To my son Israel Clarke three hundred dollars yearly paid in qrrarterly instalments — and to my son Nicholas Bellville Clarke the same provided he the said Nicholas makes no demand of my estate, and prefers no claim, legal or otherwise, for monies said to be left him by his grandfather Nicholas Bellville, in which case this annuity shall • cease, determine, and end, and shall be paid to my daughters Susan Elizabeth Hunt and Annie B. Clarke. And to my two aforesaid daughters I give and bequeath the residue of all my estates real and personal, together with the reversion of the two annuities left to my two sons after their decease. To my grandson James Clarke Hunt, the reversion of Ann Drake's annuity after her decease. And I hereby constitute, &c.
The debts and legacies have all been paid. The annuitants are all dead, except Ann Drake, and the annuities due them were all paid up to the time of their decease. William E. Hunt, the complainant, married Susan Elizabeth Hunt. She died leaving four children surviving her. The complainant has since married Annie B. Clarke, the other daughter of the testator. The executors and trustees named in the will have since the testator's death been in the receipt of the rents and profits of the real estate of the testator. The complainant, by this bill, calls upon the executors to account for the rents and profits. It is really an amicable suit to determine the true construction of the will.
The counsel who drew the bill seemed to be under the impression that the legal title to all the real estate of testator was vested in the executors, and that after the payment of the annuities, the executors still held the estate as a trust estate for the benefit of the testator's daughters, Susan Elizabeth Hunt and Annie B. Clarke. And under this idea, the complainant only asks, by his bill, that he may have the rents and profits of that portion of the estate which was given to his former wife Susan Elizabeth, claiming these rents and profits as tenant by the curtesy in the trust estate. But it appears to me very clear that there was no trust estate created by this will for the benefit of the daughters, and that whatever they take under the will is by direct gift from the testator. It is true the testator " gives and bequeaths " to Col. Thomas Cadwalader and Philemon Dickinson all his property, real and peivonal, but for what purposes ? He specifies those purposes. They are the payment of certain annuties and legacies. But after those are named, he does not then create a trust estate for the benefit of his daughters. After the fulfilment of the trust, there remains a residue to be disposed of. The testators gives it direct to his daughters without any intervention of trustees. His language is, " and to my two aforesaid daughters I give and bequeath the residue of all my estates, real and personal." Over this residue these trustees have no control. The estate given to the daughters does not partake of the nature of a trust estate. The legal title passed by this will to the daughters. " I give and bequeath the residue of all my estates ' to my daughters. What residue ? Undoubtedly that which remained after all the trusts of the will are disposed of. Suppose the will was, " I give all my estate, real and personal, to Col. T. C. and P. D. in trust to pay A. D. four hundred dollars, and all the rest and residue of my estate, real and personal, I give and bequeath to my two daughters, S. E. H. and A. B. C." In such case, it certainly would be very clear that legal title would pass to the •daughters, subject to the payment of the $500. These .annuities and legacies are nothing but a charge upon the estate. When they are satisfied, the estate is discharged •of all trusts, and the legal estate passes, by virtue of the devise and the express language of the will, to the two daughters. The will gives nothing to the trustees for the benefit of the daughters. What it gives to the daughters it gives them direct. " To my two aforesaid daughters, I give and bequeath the residue," &c.
The rights of the husband, therefore, in this estate are the rights which a husband has in an estate of fee simple of his wife.
The complainant jure marvbi, as the husband of Susan E. Clarke, is entitled to all the residue of the personal estate of the testator and of all the rents, issues, and profits of the real estate in the hands of the executors at the time of her death; and, as tencmt by the eurtesy, he takes a life estate in the residue of the real estate which belonged to her under her father's will, and, as such, may dispose of it during his life.
As the husband of Annie B. Clarke, the complainant is entitled to all the residue of the personal estate of the testator, and of all the rents, issues, and profits of the real estate in the hands of the executors, except such as had been paid to her previous to her marriage. The complainant is entitled to an account as soon as the trusts of the will are performed, or properly secured by a decree of this court. All the legacies have been paid, and all the annuities are extinguished, except that of Ann Drake. This is an annuity of twenty-four dollars a year, the revision of which now belongs to James C. Hunt. There are more than funds sufficient in the hands of the executors to secure this annuity.
There must be reference to a master to take an account of the personal estate and of the rents of the real estate of the testator now in the hands of the executors, making all just allowances, and to state what sum will be sufficient to remain in the hands of the executors as a principal to secure the annuity to Ann Drake.