Case Name: Robert Hartling et al. v. George Sawicksky et al.
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1966-11-01
Citations: 154 Conn. 729
Docket Number: 
Parties: Robert Hartling et al. v. George Sawicksky et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 154
Pages: 729–729

Head Matter:
Robert Hartling et al. v. George Sawicksky et al.
Hyman Wilensky, for the appellants (named plaintiff et al.), and David A Beiser, assistant attorney general, for the appellant (state as intervening plaintiff).
Argued November 1
decided November 1, 1966

Opinion:
It appearing that the plaintiffs in the above-entitled case have failed to prosecute their appeal from the Superior Court in New London County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed.