Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward M. CZUPRYNSKI, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1994-02-17
Citations: 16 F.3d 704
Docket Number: No. 93-1079
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward M. CZUPRYNSKI, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge; KEITH, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, and DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 16
Pages: 704–705

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward M. CZUPRYNSKI, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 93-1079.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Feb. 17, 1994.
Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge; KEITH, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, and DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
Prior report: 8 F.3d 1113.
A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:
The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.
The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.