Case Name: In re Buster A. YANCEY, Jr., Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-04-19
Citations: 12 F. App'x 135
Docket Number: No. 01-6282
Parties: In re Buster A. YANCEY, Jr., Petitioner.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 12
Pages: 135–135

Head Matter:
In re Buster A. YANCEY, Jr., Petitioner.
No. 01-6282.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 12, 2001.
Decided April 19, 2001.
Buster A. Yancey, Jr., Petitioner pro se.
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Buster A. Yancey, Jr., has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus from this court ordering the district court to release him from custody. Mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402, 96 S.Ct. 2119, 48 L.Ed.2d 725 (1976). Mandamus relief is only available when there are no other means by which the relief sought could be granted, In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir.1987), and may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re Catawba Indian Tribe, 973 F.2d 1133, 1135 (4th Cir.1992). The party seeking mandamus relief carries the heavy burden of showing that he has "no other adequate means to attain the relief he desires" and that his entitlement to such relief is "clear and indisputable." Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc., 449 U.S. 33, 35, 101 S.Ct. 188, 66 L.Ed.2d 193 (1980). Yancey has not made such a showing.
Accordingly, we deny Yancey's petition for mandamus and his motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.