Case Name: CITY OF MIAMI, Appellant, v. The BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF the MIAMI CITY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, et al., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1982-05-18
Citations: 414 So. 2d 26
Docket Number: No. 80-2266
Parties: CITY OF MIAMI, Appellant, v. The BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF the MIAMI CITY EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM, et al., Appellee.
Judges: Before HUBBART, C. J., and HENDRY and FERGUSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 414
Pages: 26–26

Head Matter:
CITY OF MIAMI, Appellant, v. The BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF the MIAMI CITY EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM, et al., Appellee.
No. 80-2266.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 18, 1982.
George F. Knox, Jr., City Atty. and Ronald J. Cohen, Asst. City Atty., Paul, Landy, Beiley, Harper & Metsch and Robert M. Sondak, Miami, for appellant.
Edmond J. Gong, Kaplan, Sicking, Hes-sen, Sugarman, Rosenthal & De Castro and Richard A. Sicking, Irving Weinsoff, Pelzner, Schwedock, Finkelstein & Klaus-ner, Miami, for appellees.
Before HUBBART, C. J., and HENDRY and FERGUSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The trial court's constitutional stay writ, barring City of Miami ordinances 9168 and 9169 from taking effect, was properly issued to preserve the status quo pending resolution of a prior action in circuit court challenging a city appropriation ordinance affecting funding of the retirement system. See City of North Miami v. Engel, 109 So.2d 33 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959), cert., dism., 115 So.2d 1 (Fla.1959). Art. V, § 5(b), Fla.Const.
Affirmed.