Case Name: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. John HINDENACH, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1998-10-29
Citations: 720 So. 2d 242
Docket Number: No. 92880
Parties: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. John HINDENACH, Respondent.
Judges: HARDING, C.J., and OVERTON and WELLS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 720
Pages: 242–243

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. John HINDENACH, Respondent.
No. 92880.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Oct. 29, 1998.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Celia A. Terenzio, Assistant Attorney General, Chief, West Palm Beach Bureau, and James J. Carney, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for Petitioner.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Susan D. Cline, Assistant Public Defender, Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, West Palm Beach, for Respondent.

Opinion:
SHAW, Justice.
We have for review Hindenach v. State, 708 So.2d 336 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), wherein the district court certified conflict with Mays v. State, 693 So.2d 52 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.
We have since approved the district court decision in Mays. See Mays v. State, 717 So.2d 515, 23 Fla. L. Weekly S387 (Fla.1998) (holding that under section 921.001(5), Florida Statutes (1995), if the "true" recommended guidelines sentence exceeds the statutory maximum, the guidelines sentence must be imposed). Accordingly, we quash Hindenach,
It is so ordered.
HARDING, C.J., and OVERTON and WELLS, JJ., concur.
PARIENTE, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with an opinion, in which KOGAN and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.
. We decline to address the other issue raised by Hindenach since it was not the basis for our review.