Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rodney Curtis HAMRICK, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-03-05
Citations: 30 F. App'x 190
Docket Number: No. 01-7774
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rodney Curtis HAMRICK, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 30
Pages: 190–190

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rodney Curtis HAMRICK, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 01-7774.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 21, 2002.
Decided March 5, 2002.
Rodney Curtis Hamrick, Appellant Pro Se. David Jonathan Horne, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Dayton, Ohio; David Earl Godwin, Assistant United States Attorney, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Rodney Curtis Hamrick seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Hamrick, Nos. CR-91-56; CA-99-90-5 (N.D.W.Va. Sept. 13, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.