Case Name: Antrone L. CROCKETT, Appellant-Defendant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff
Court: Court of Appeals of Indiana
Jurisdiction: Indiana
Decision Date: 2019-01-31
Citations: 121 N.E.3d 152
Docket Number: Court of Appeals Case No. 18A-CR-391
Parties: Antrone L. CROCKETT, Appellant-Defendant,
v.
STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff
Judges: 
Reporter: North Eastern Reporter 3d
Volume: 121
Pages: 152–152

Head Matter:
Antrone L. CROCKETT, Appellant-Defendant,
v.
STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff
Court of Appeals Case No. 18A-CR-391
Court of Appeals of Indiana.
FILED January 31, 2019
Appellant Pro Se: Antrone L. Crockett, South Bend, Indiana
Attorneys for Appellee: Curtis T. Hill, Jr., Attorney General, Jesse R. Drum, Deputy Attorney General, Indianapolis, Indiana
MEMORANDUM DECISION

Opinion:
Vaidik, Chief Judge.
[1] In 2005, Antrone L. Crockett was convicted of Class A felony conspiracy to commit murder, and the trial court sentenced him to forty years. In 2018, Crockett filed a motion to correct erroneous sentence pursuant to Indiana Code section 35-38-1-15. Specifically, he argued that his "conviction is illegal on its Face" because the State did not properly charge him with conspiracy. Appellant's App. p. 22 (emphasis added). The trial court denied Crockett's motion without holding a hearing because he did not allege "that the sentence itself is erroneous on its face." Id. at 49. We affirm. The purpose of Section 35-38-1-15"is to provide prompt, direct access to an uncomplicated legal process for correcting the occasional erroneous or illegal sentence ." Robinson v. State , 805 N.E.2d 783, 785 (Ind. 2004) (emphasis added). Here, however, the basis of Crockett's motion is that his conviction-not his sentence-is illegal.
[2] Affirmed.
Mathias, J., and Crone, J., concur.