Case Name: Eddie WALKER, Petitioner, v. LITCEY WALKER PLASTERING and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1964-10-07
Citations: 167 So. 2d 865
Docket Number: No. 33518
Parties: Eddie WALKER, Petitioner, v. LITCEY WALKER PLASTERING and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
Judges: DREW, C. J., and THORNAL, O’CON-NELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 167
Pages: 865–865

Head Matter:
Eddie WALKER, Petitioner, v. LITCEY WALKER PLASTERING and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
No. 33518.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Oct. 7, 1964.
Nadler & Tuniclc, Miami, for petitioner.
Charles Desmond Crowley, Fort Lauder-dale, for Litcey Walker Plastering; Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for Florida Industrial Commission, respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date April 15, 1964.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, suhd. e., 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.
DREW, C. J., and THORNAL, O'CON-NELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.