Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. David THOMAS, Jr., Appellant; David THOMAS, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1997-06-27
Citations: 948 S.W.2d 199
Docket Number: No. 68685
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. David THOMAS, Jr., Appellant. David THOMAS, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 948
Pages: 199–199

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. David THOMAS, Jr., Appellant. David THOMAS, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 68685.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
June 27, 1997.
David Simpson, Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
John Munson Morris, III, Attorney General, Jacqueline K. Hamra, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, David Thomas, Jr., appeals the judgment of conviction for robbery in the first degree, RSMo section 569.020 (1994), and armed criminal action, RSMo section 571.015 (1994), entered by the Circuit Court of the County of Cape Girardeau after a jury trial. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment is supported by sufficient evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
. As defendant's brief raises no issues regarding the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion, his appeal from that judgment is deemed abandoned. State v. Nelson, 818 S.W.2d 285, 287 (Mo.App. E.D. 1991).