Case Name: Burroughs Wellcome & Co. (U. S. A.), Inc., respondent, v. Harry Weissbard et al., individually, &c., appellants
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1942-01-09
Citations: 130 N.J. Eq. 605
Docket Number: 
Parties: Burroughs Wellcome & Co. (U. S. A.), Inc., respondent, v. Harry Weissbard et al., individually, &c., appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 130
Pages: 605–605

Head Matter:
Burroughs Wellcome & Co. (U. S. A.), Inc., respondent, v. Harry Weissbard et al., individually, &c., appellants.
[Decided January 9th, 1942.]
Messrs. Gross £ Blumberg, for the respondent.
Messrs. Bilder, Bilder £ Kaufman, for the appellants.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Egan and reported at 129 N. J. Eq. 563.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Porter, Colie, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 12.
For reversal — Case, Perskie, JJ. 2.'