Case Name: In the Matter of the Application of Ernest Petrucci, Appellant, for an Order for the Examination of Alexander Ercole, Respondent, in Proceedings Supplementary to Execution, etc.
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1922-10
Citations: 203 A.D. 871
Docket Number: Appeal No. 1
Parties: In the Matter of the Application of Ernest Petrucci, Appellant, for an Order for the Examination of Alexander Ercole, Respondent, in Proceedings Supplementary to Execution, etc.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 203
Pages: 871–871

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Application of Ernest Petrucci, Appellant, for an Order for the Examination of Alexander Ercole, Respondent, in Proceedings Supplementary to Execution, etc.
(Appeal No. 1.)

Opinion:
Order of the County Court of Queens county reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The examination is directed to be held before the Queens county judge on November 13, 1922, at the county court house, Long Island City, at ten o'clock, a. m. The county judge of Queens county has jurisdiction of this proceeding. The provisions of section 778 of the Civil Practice Act do not confer jurisdiction upon the City Court of the City of New York of a supplementary proceeding to examine a judgment debtor residing without the territorial jurisdiction of that court. If the Queens county judge is disqualified, appellant may apply to the Supreme Court, under section 190 of the Civil Practice Act, for removal of the proceeding to that court. Blackmar, P. J., Jaycox, Manning, Kelby and Young, JJ., concur.