Case Name: Glynndeavin von FOX, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-08-24
Citations: 668 F. App'x 446
Docket Number: No. 16-6336
Parties: Glynndeavin von FOX, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 668
Pages: 446–447

Head Matter:
Glynndeavin von FOX, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 16-6336
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: August 16, 2016
Decided: August 24, 2016
Glynndeavin von Fox, Appellant Pro Se.
Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Glynndeavin von Fox appeals the district court's order denying his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing his case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal and dismiss von Fox's appeal for the reasons stated by the district court, von Fox v. S.C. Judicial Dep't, No. 2:16-cv-00209-RMG (D.S.C. Feb. 12, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten tions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED