Case Name: Fogel Refrigerator Company v. Oteri, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1958-01-06
Citations: 391 Pa. 188
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 378
Parties: Fogel Refrigerator Company v. Oteri, Appellant.
Judges: Before Jones, C, J., Bell, Chidsey, Musmanno, Jones and Cohen, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 391
Pages: 188–189

Head Matter:
Fogel Refrigerator Company v. Oteri, Appellant.
Argued November 22, 1957.
Before Jones, C, J., Bell, Chidsey, Musmanno, Jones and Cohen, JJ.
Philip P. Kalodner, with him Charles F. Mayer and Dilworth, Paxson, Kálish & Green, for appellants.
William A. Goiehman, with him Max A'. Darof, for appellee.
January 6, 1958:

Opinion:
Opinion
per Curiam,
The sole question presented on this appeal, is whether the court below erred in refusing to open a judgment entered on a promissory note against appellants.
A petition to open a judgment is addressed to the sound discretion of the court below and, unless an abuse of such discretion appears, its action will not be reversed: Ehnes v. Wagner, 388 Pa. 102, 130 A. 2d 171; Gagnon v. Speback, 383 Pa. 359, 118 A. 2d 744.
Our examination of the instant record indicates no abuse of discretion on the part of the court below.
The order is affirmed on the able opinion of President Judge Eugene V. Alessandroni reported in 10 Pa. D. & C. 2d 511.