Case Name: Bohunka O. Held, Respondent, v. Peter Held, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1994-02-08
Citations: 201 A.D.2d 301
Docket Number: 
Parties: Bohunka O. Held, Respondent, v Peter Held, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 201
Pages: 301–302

Head Matter:
Bohunka O. Held, Respondent, v Peter Held, Appellant.
[608 NYS2d 835]

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter M. Schackman, J.), entered March 10, 1992, which, inter alia, restored temporary maintenance of $500 a week in favor of plaintiff, sua sponte, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
We perceive no abuse of discretion in the reinstatement of the temporary maintenance award, and reiterate that "the proper remedy of a party who thinks that temporary support payments ordered are excessive is to press for an early trial" (Dreyfus v Dreyfus, 72 AD2d 522). We have considered defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman and Nardelli, JJ.