Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Walter EDEN, Appellant; Walter EDEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1994-01-04
Citations: 866 S.W.2d 943
Docket Number: Nos. 60637, 63288
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Walter EDEN, Appellant. Walter EDEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GRIMM, P.J., and CARL R. GAERTNER and AHRENS, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 866
Pages: 943–943

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Walter EDEN, Appellant. Walter EDEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 60637, 63288.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Jan. 4, 1994.
John Klosterman, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Millie Aulbur, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before GRIMM, P.J., and CARL R. GAERTNER and AHRENS, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant, Walter Eden, appeals from his convictions in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis on one count of first-degree murder, Sec. 565.020 RSMo. (1986), and one count of armed criminal action, Sec. 571.015 RSMo. (1986), and from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion.
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, we have furnished the parties with a memorandum opinion setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgments are affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b) and Rule 84.-16(b).