Case Name: Anna BILIC, Claimant/Appellant, v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES, Employer/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1992-01-14
Citations: 821 S.W.2d 135
Docket Number: No. 60083
Parties: Anna BILIC, Claimant/Appellant, v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES, Employer/Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 821
Pages: 135–136

Head Matter:
Anna BILIC, Claimant/Appellant, v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES, Employer/Respondent.
No. 60083.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Jan. 14, 1992.
Ray B. Marglous, Julia L. Gray, Ray B. Marglous, P.C., St. Louis, for claimant/appellant.
Larry D. Valentine, Rietmann & Goess-ing, St. Louis, for employer/respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Claimant appeals from an order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission allowing compensation and affirming the award of the Administrative Law Judge against her former employer. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to 84.16(b).