Case Name: Leokadya Fron, an Infant, etc., Respondent, v. Stanley Wolski, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1929-01
Citations: 226 A.D. 844
Docket Number: 
Parties: Leokadya Fron, an Infant, etc., Respondent, v. Stanley Wolski, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 226
Pages: 844–844

Head Matter:
Leokadya Fron, an Infant, etc., Respondent, v. Stanley Wolski, Appellant.

Opinion:
Judgment and order reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event, on the ground that there was a question of fact presented as to whether or not the plaintiff was non sm juris. (Camardo v. New York State Railways, 247 N. Y. 111.) All concur. Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Edgcomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.