Case Name: Raenita McKIMM v. STATE of Arkansas
Court: Arkansas Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Arkansas
Decision Date: 1988-01-13
Citations: 294 Ark. 208
Docket Number: 
Parties: Raenita McKIMM v. STATE of Arkansas
Judges: 
Reporter: Arkansas Reports
Volume: 294
Pages: 208–209

Head Matter:
Raenita McKIMM v. STATE of Arkansas
742 S.W.2d 114
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Opinion delivered January 13, 1988
D. Scott Hickam, for petitioner.
No objection.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Petitioner, Raenita McKimm, by and through her attorneys, Hickam & Williams, P.A., has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. Her attorney, D. Scott Hickam, admits that the record was submitted late due to his miscalculation of the seven-month maximum limit for filing the record in this Court. See Ark. R. App. P. 5.
We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See per curiam dated February 5, 1979, 265 Ark. 964; Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243 (1981).
A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.