Case Name: Bedford MITCHELL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2010-08-17
Citations: 318 S.W.3d 308
Docket Number: No. ED 92863
Parties: Bedford MITCHELL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 318
Pages: 308–309

Head Matter:
Bedford MITCHELL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 92863.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Aug. 17, 2010.
Lisa M. Stoup, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Robert J. Bartholomew, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Bedford Mitchell (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his motion for post- conviction relief under Rule 24.035 after an evidentiary hearing. The motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value and we affirm by written order. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).