Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Martin F. SALAZAR, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-05-08
Citations: 473 F. App'x 217
Docket Number: No. 11-7574
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Martin F. SALAZAR, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 473
Pages: 217–217

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Martin F. SALAZAR, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 11-7574.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 27, 2012.
Decided: May 8, 2012.
Martin F. Salazar, Appellant Pro Se. Dean A. Eichelberger, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Martin F. Salazar appeals the district court's order denying his motion for modification or termination of supervised release. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in Salazar's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Salazar's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, Salazar has forfeited appellate review. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.