Case Name: Garland VANCE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-08-29
Citations: 565 So. 2d 915
Docket Number: No. 89-2257
Parties: Garland VANCE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ANSTEAD and STONE, JJ., and FRANK, RICHARD H., Associate Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 565
Pages: 915–915

Head Matter:
Garland VANCE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 89-2257.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Aug. 29, 1990.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Cherry Grant, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and John M. Koenig, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We reject appellant's constitutional attacks on the authority of Schmitt v. State, 563 So.2d 1095 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); and Osborne v. Ohio, 495 U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 1691, 109 L.Ed.2d 98 (1990).
We agree with appellant that he was improperly sentenced under a category 2 scoresheet rather than a category 9 score-sheet. Category 2 covers only sexual offenses prosecuted under chapters 794 and 800 and section 826.04, Florida Statutes. Those statutes are not involved herein. See Robertson v. State, 559 So.2d 352 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990) and Hutcheson v. State, 501 So.2d 190 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987).
Accordingly, we affirm appellant's conviction but remand with directions for re-sentencing consistent herewith.
ANSTEAD and STONE, JJ., and FRANK, RICHARD H., Associate Judge, concur.