Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Karl John CASCKETTA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-09-19
Citations: 479 F. App'x 153
Docket Number: No. 11-10059
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Karl John CASCKETTA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 479
Pages: 153–153

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Karl John CASCKETTA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-10059.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 10, 2012.
Filed Sept. 19, 2012.
Joan G. Ruffennach, Assistant U.S., USPX-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Stephen Christopher, Kunkle Law Office of Stephen C. Kunkle, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Karl John Cascketta appeals from the revocation of his supervised release and the 24-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Cascketta's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Cascketta the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.