Case Name: Sharon MOATS, Plaintiff-Appellant, and William Moats, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee, and City Hospital, Incorporated; Courtney Struthers, M.D.; Dawn Reed Jones, M.D.; Shenandoah Valley Medical System, Incorporated; WVUH-East; Gateway Regional Health System, Incorporated, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-08-12
Citations: 340 F. App'x 862
Docket Number: No. 08-1547
Parties: Sharon MOATS, Plaintiff—Appellant, and William Moats, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant—Appellee, and City Hospital, Incorporated; Courtney Struthers, M.D.; Dawn Reed Jones, M.D.; Shenandoah Valley Medical System, Incorporated; WVUH-East; Gateway Regional Health System, Incorporated, Defendants.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, DUNCAN, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 340
Pages: 862–863

Head Matter:
Sharon MOATS, Plaintiff—Appellant, and William Moats, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant—Appellee, and City Hospital, Incorporated; Courtney Struthers, M.D.; Dawn Reed Jones, M.D.; Shenandoah Valley Medical System, Incorporated; WVUH-East; Gateway Regional Health System, Incorporated, Defendants.
No. 08-1547.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 30, 2009.
Decided: Aug. 12, 2009.
Barry J. Nace, Paulson & Nace, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Sharon L. Potter, United States Attorney, Helen Campbell Altmeyer, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, DUNCAN, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Sharon Moats appeals from the district court's orders granting judgment in favor of the Defendant in her professional liability action brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act and alleging medical malpractice by physicians at Shenandoah Community Health Center and denying her motion for reconsideration, a new trial, and judgment. Moats argues on appeal that the district court erred in finding that the Shenandoah Community Health Center physicians were not negligent in their care of her. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Moats, Nos. 3:06-cv00120-JPB-JES; 3:07-cv-00022-JPB (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 19 & 27, 2008).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
The United States was substituted as the Defendant for the physicians at Shenandoah Community Health Center.