Case Name: Lisa ROBISON, Employee/Appellant, v. TREASURER OF the STATE OF MISSOURI, as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-05-17
Citations: 164 S.W.3d 91
Docket Number: No. ED 85045
Parties: Lisa ROBISON, Employee/Appellant, v. TREASURER OF the STATE OF MISSOURI, as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Respondent.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 164
Pages: 91–92

Head Matter:
Lisa ROBISON, Employee/Appellant, v. TREASURER OF the STATE OF MISSOURI, as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Respondent.
No. ED 85045.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
May 17, 2005.
Robert Joseph Lenze, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Emily Rushing Kelly, Assistant Attorney General, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Lisa Robison appeals from a Final Award Denying Compensation (Final Award) of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (the Commission) affirming an Award and Decision of the Administrative Law Judge with the Division of Workers' Compensation. We have re viewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the Final Award of the Commission is not contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence and thus is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. Hampton v. Big Boy Steel Erection, 121 S.W.3d 220, 222-223 (Mo. banc 2003). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).