Case Name: The KIMBERLEY RICE KAESTNER 1992 FAMILY TRUST v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 2016-12-08
Citations: 793 S.E.2d 683
Docket Number: No. 307PA15-2
Parties: The KIMBERLEY RICE KAESTNER 1992 FAMILY TRUST
v.
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
Judges: 
Reporter: South Eastern Reporter 2d
Volume: 793
Pages: 683–684

Head Matter:
The KIMBERLEY RICE KAESTNER 1992 FAMILY TRUST
v.
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
No. 307PA15-2
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
December 8, 2016.
Peggy S. Vincent, Assistant Attorney General, Tenisha S. Jacobs, Assistant Attorney General, Hon. Robert F. Orr, Attorney at Law, for North Carolina Department of Revenue.
Thomas D. Myrick, Attorney at Law, Neil T. Bloomfield, Attorney at Law, Kara N. Bitar, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, for The Kimberley Rice Kaestner 1992 Family Trust.
ORDER

Opinion:
Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by State of NC on the 9th of August 2016 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is
"Dismissed Ex Mero Motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."
Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 22nd of July 2016 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 9th of August 2016 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of December 2016."
Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15 (g)(2).