Case Name: Edward O. MUELLER, Plaintiff, v. RAYON CONSULTANTS, INCORPORATED, and William R. Schmitz, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1959-11-12
Citations: 271 F.2d 591
Docket Number: No. 25753
Parties: Edward O. MUELLER, Plaintiff, v. RAYON CONSULTANTS, INCORPORATED, and William R. Schmitz, Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 271
Pages: 591–591

Head Matter:
Edward O. MUELLER, Plaintiff, v. RAYON CONSULTANTS, INCORPORATED, and William R. Schmitz, Defendants.
No. 25753.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Petition for Rehearing en Banc Filed Sept. 10, 1959.
Decided Nov. 12, 1959.
Spar, Schlem & Burroughs, New York City (Charles Spar and Leon B. Savet-sky, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.
Reid & Priest, New York City (Ralph M. McDermid, New York City, of counsel), for defendants.
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and LUMBARD, WATERMAN, MOORE and FRIENDLY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The petition to vacate our order of August 28, 1959, is denied by the court sitting en bcmc. Upon reconsideration we find that the application for leave to appeal was timely inasmuch as it was made to us within 10 days of the order of the district judge that contained the 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) statement. Because in our judgment the grant of leave to appeal will not fulfill the purpose expressed in the statute, we, in our discretion, adhere to our previous decision denying leave to appeal.