Case Name: William REED, Appellant, v. Warden Ricardo MARTINEZ, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-11-08
Citations: 253 F. App'x 620
Docket Number: No. 06-2667
Parties: William REED, Appellant, v. Warden Ricardo MARTINEZ, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 253
Pages: 620–620

Head Matter:
William REED, Appellant, v. Warden Ricardo MARTINEZ, Appellee.
No. 06-2667.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 2, 2007.
Filed: Nov. 8, 2007.
William Reed, Yankton, SD, pro se.
Michael E. Ridgway, Jan Leslie Holmgren, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Sioux Falls, SD, for Appellee.
Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
William Reed appeals the district court's order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. Because the district court correctly concluded Reed did not establish that 28 U.S.C. § 2255 was inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Karen E. Schreier, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of South Dakota.