Case Name: Eliza L. Hirschberger, Resp't, v. The Manhattan Railway Company et al., App'lts
Court: New York Superior Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1892-03-14
Citations: 44 N.Y. St. Rep. 828
Docket Number: 
Parties: Eliza L. Hirschberger, Resp’t, v. The Manhattan Railway Company et al., App’lts.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 44
Pages: 828–828

Head Matter:
Eliza L. Hirschberger, Resp’t, v. The Manhattan Railway Company et al., App’lts.
(New York Superior Court, General Term,
Filed March 14, 1892.)
Appeal by defendants from judgment entered upon the decision of a judge at special term.
Joseph E. Lord, for app’lts; Charles A. B. Pratt, Jr., for resp’t.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The questions raised by the appellants in this case are the same that have been decided, unfavorably to them, in Seebach v. The Metropolitan Elevated R. Co. argued this term.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Sedgwick, Ch. J., Dugro and Gildersleeve, JJ., concur.