Case Name: Rebeca Salas DEVORA, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-12-05
Citations: 156 F. App'x 928
Docket Number: No. 04-73787
Parties: Rebeca Salas DEVORA, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before WALLACE, LEAVY, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 156
Pages: 928–928

Head Matter:
Rebeca Salas DEVORA, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 04-73787.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 8, 2005.
Decided Dec. 5, 2005.
Rebeca Salas Devora, Pomona, CA, pro se.
CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Michele Y.F. Sarko, Esq., M. Jocelyn Wright, Esq., DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before WALLACE, LEAVY, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Rebeca Salas Devora, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") decision dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge's ("IJ") order denying her motion to reconsider, and denying her motion to reopen before the BIA. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition for review.
Even construed liberally, Salas Devora's pro se brief does not challenge the BIA's determinations that her motion to reconsider before the IJ was untimely, or that her motion to reopen before the BIA was untimely. Accordingly, Salas Devora has waived any challenge to the BIA's June 30, 2004, order dismissing her appeal and denying her motion to reopen. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996).
We are unable to consider the new health-related facts alleged by Salas Devora because they are not part of the administrative record. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(A); Fisher v. INS, 79 F.3d 955, 963 (9th Cir.1996) (en banc).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th .Cir. R. 36-3.