Case Name: AKRON COLD SPRING CO. v. UNKNOWN HEIRS OF JUSTIN ELY
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1923-06-08
Citations: 1 Ohio Law Abs. 614
Docket Number: No. 649
Parties: AKRON COLD SPRING CO. v. UNKNOWN HEIRS OF JUSTIN ELY
Judges: 
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 1
Pages: 614–615

Head Matter:
No. 648
AKRON COLD SPRING CO. v. UNKNOWN HEIRS OF JUSTIN ELY
Ohio Appeals, 9th District, Summit County
No. 649.
Decided June 8, 1923
This opinion has not been published except in Abstract.
145. DEEDS.
Whether provision in deed is„a reservation or exception.

Opinion:
WASHBURN, J.:
Epitomized Opinion
Action to quiet title to land: which Spring Co. has been in possession of for over 70 years. Ely was the owner of certain real estate on which there was a valuable spring. Ely and members of the Spring Co. made an agreement as to this spring and the Company took possession thereunder. Ely died in 1855. His executors executed and delivered to Hartman a warranty deed of all of Ely's land. This deed contained the following provision: "Being subject to all legal highways, also to all rights of the Akron Cold Spring Co. to the spring of water on said land, together with not exceeding sixty-one-hundredths of an acre for a reservoir at said spring, with the right to use stone for the construction of said reservoir from the land so reserved to said Company." Seven months thereafter executors executed and delivered to Spring Co. a warranty deed of this land. The deed recited that Spring Co. had constructed a reservoir and laid pipe to it and' had enclosed the land with a fence in conformity with agreement between members of the Company and Ely, and provided that the land should be used solely for reservoir, and provided for a right of re-entry for failure of Spring Co. to do certain things. On appeal the Court of Appeals in quieting tit'e of the Spring Co., held:
1. The language of the deed to Hartman as to the Spring Co. is an exception and not a reservation. "A reservation is something taken back out of that which is granted and creates an easement; an exception is some part of the estate not granted at all." Though the word reserved is used, it is customary to ignore the terms and determine the question according to the nature of the right sought to be created. The parties intended an exception as shown by the subsequent deed of executors to Spring Co.
2. If the provision in the deed toi Hartman is construed as a reservation in the nature of an easement the Spring Co. received no right in said property because it was not a party to the deed. A reservation in a deed is ineffectual to create title in a stranger to the conveyance. Therefore if the Spring Co. obtained no rights by the deeds it has been in the open, notorious, exclusive, adverse possession of the property for 70 years, and for that reason also title of the Spring Co. should be quieted.