Case Name: Jacqueline WOODS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Cassandra SMITH, Security Personnel; Michael Adu; William Washington, District Manager, Defendants-Appellees, and Ja-Kia Anthony, Human Resources, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-03-19
Citations: 370 F. App'x 406
Docket Number: No. 09-2270
Parties: Jacqueline WOODS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Cassandra SMITH, Security Personnel; Michael Adu; William Washington, District Manager, Defendants—Appellees, and Ja-Kia Anthony, Human Resources, Defendant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 370
Pages: 406–407

Head Matter:
Jacqueline WOODS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Cassandra SMITH, Security Personnel; Michael Adu; William Washington, District Manager, Defendants—Appellees, and Ja-Kia Anthony, Human Resources, Defendant.
No. 09-2270.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 16, 2010.
Decided: March 19, 2010.
Jacqueline Woods, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Ramapuram, Bonner, Kiernan, Trebaeh & Crociata, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jacqueline Woods appeals the district court's order dismissing her action with prejudice for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Woods v. Smith, No. 1:09-ev-00527-JCC-IDD (E.D.Va. Oct. 6, 2009). Additionally, we deny Woods's motion to strike and motion to compel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.