Case Name: Viering, Appellee, v. Scott et al., Appellants, et al.
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1949-11-09
Citations: 152 Ohio St. 211
Docket Number: No. 31775
Parties: Viering, Appellee, v. Scott et al., Appellants, et al.
Judges: Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Stewart, Turner and Taet, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, New Service
Volume: 152
Pages: 211–213

Head Matter:
Viering, Appellee, v. Scott et al., Appellants, et al.
(No. 31775
Decided November 9, 1949.)
Messrs. Gottwald, Hershey & Hatch and Mr. E. D. Fritch, for appellee.
Messrs. Meade, Weygandt, Leonard & Meade, for appellants.

Opinion:
By the Court.
The cause is before this court on a motion to dismiss the appeal or to affirm the decree for the reasons that no bill of exceptions was prepared and filéd in the Court of Appeals pursuant to Section 11564, General Code, and that the errors assigned and legal questions thereby raised are not sufficiently or adequately presented for review by the record filed in this court.
The present record does not contain either a bill of exceptions prepared in the Court of Appeals, a finding of facts by that court or a stipulation by counsel to try the case de novo in the Court of Appeals upon a bill of exceptions prepared in the Court of Common Pleas.
The case being in this court after the allowance of a motion to certify the record and there being an insufficient record to review the errors assigned, the decree of the Court of Appeals is affirmed on authority of DeMoss v. Conart Motor Sales, Inc., 149 Ohio St., 299, 78 N. E. (2d), 675.
Decree affirmed.
Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Stewart, Turner and Taet, JJ., concur.
Weygandt, C. J., not participating.