Case Name: Frank MOORE and Gertrude R. Moore, his wife, Appellants, v. SKY REALTY, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1976-11-23
Citations: 339 So. 2d 299
Docket Number: No. 75-1444
Parties: Frank MOORE and Gertrude R. Moore, his wife, Appellants, v. SKY REALTY, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellee.
Judges: Before PEARSON, HENDRY and HAV-ERFIELD, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 339
Pages: 299–300

Head Matter:
Frank MOORE and Gertrude R. Moore, his wife, Appellants, v. SKY REALTY, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellee.
No. 75-1444.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 23, 1976.
Melvin D. Bratton, Coral Gables, for appellants.
Emanuel Sponder, Miramar, for appellee.
Before PEARSON, HENDRY and HAV-ERFIELD, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a final judgment awarding a real estate brokerage commission.
On March 4, 1974 appellant Gertrude Moore and her husband executed a multiple listing agreement whereby they agreed to pay Sky Realty, Inc. a 7V2% real estate commission if it could procure a purchaser to buy their home for $55,000. On May 9 Sky Realty procured Mr. and Mrs. Spital-nick who made an offer of $53,000. The Moores turned it down. On the next morning (May 10) the Spitalnicks went to the office of Sky Realty and made an offer of $55,000 cash. This offer was immediately communicated to the Moores. They refused to accept and sent a telegram dated May 11 instructing Sky Realty to take their house off the market. Sky Realty then sued for the 7V2% commission and the cause proceeded to a non-jury trial. The judge found for Sky Realty and entered a final judgment in its favor for $4,125 plus interest.
Although appellant raises nine points on appeal, she has failed to present to this court a transcript of testimony. This court is required to affirm where an appellant fails to bring up the transcript of testimony given at a final hearing and that testimony forms the major evidentiary support for the trial court's findings and ruling. Veterans Loan Authority v. Danzo, 210 So.2d 461 (Fla.3d DCA 1968).
Affirmed.