Case Name: Amsterdam Urban Renewal Agency, Respondent, v. Francis L. McGrattan et al., Appellants
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1983-04-26
Citations: 59 N.Y.2d 624
Docket Number: 
Parties: Amsterdam Urban Renewal Agency, Respondent, v Francis L. McGrattan et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 59
Pages: 624–626

Head Matter:
Amsterdam Urban Renewal Agency, Respondent, v Francis L. McGrattan et al., Appellants.
Decided April 26, 1983
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Richard A. Insogna for appellants.
Vincent E. Vicinanzo for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (91 AD2d 792).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons. -