Case Name: Alfredo LLAGUNO and Mercy Llaguno, Appellants, v. ARI MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, etc., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1998-07-29
Citations: 719 So. 2d 311
Docket Number: No. 97-3365
Parties: Alfredo LLAGUNO and Mercy Llaguno, Appellants, v. ARI MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, etc., Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and JORGENSON and LEVY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 719
Pages: 311–312

Head Matter:
Alfredo LLAGUNO and Mercy Llaguno, Appellants, v. ARI MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, etc., Appellee.
No. 97-3365.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 29, 1998.
Rehearing Denied Nov. 4, 1998.
Ress, Mintz & Truppman and Keith A. Truppman, North Miami, for appellants.
Adorno & Zeder and Raoul G. Cantero, III and William S. Berk, Coconut Grove, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and JORGENSON and LEVY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Just as we held in Perez v. Allstate Ins. Co., 709 So.2d 591 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), "Upon the sole condition that the insured[s] file the sworn proof of loss required by the policy in support of . [their] claim for additional insured damages, the order below denying appraisal is reversed on the authority of Allstate Ins. Co. v. Sierra, 705 So.2d 119 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), and the cause is remanded with directions to order appraisal".
SCHWARTZ, C.J., and LEVY, J., concur.