Case Name: James BELLS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gary D. MAYNARD; John & Jane Doe, SCDC Prison Officials, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-09-15
Citations: 109 F. App'x 535
Docket Number: No. 04-6641
Parties: James BELLS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gary D. MAYNARD; John & Jane Doe, SCDC Prison Officials, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 109
Pages: 535–535

Head Matter:
James BELLS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gary D. MAYNARD; John & Jane Doe, SCDC Prison Officials, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 04-6641.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 9, 2004.
Decided: Sept. 15, 2004.
James Bells, Jr., Appellant pro se.
James Victor McDade, Doyle, O’Rourke, Tate & McDade, PA, Anderson, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
James Bells, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bells v. Maynard, No. CA-02-3981-6-12 (D.S.C. Mar. 18, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED