Case Name: SMITH Exrx etc v. STEVENSON Admr etc
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1930-03-25
Citations: 8 Ohio Law Abs. 311
Docket Number: No 222
Parties: SMITH Exrx etc v STEVENSON Admr etc
Judges: Before Judgese Hughes, Justice and Crow.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 8
Pages: 311–312

Head Matter:
SMITH Exrx etc v STEVENSON Admr etc
Ohio Appeals, 3rd Dist, Hardin Co
No 222.
Decided March 25, 1930
Stickle & Cessna, Kenton, for Smith.
John H. Smick, Kenton, for Stevenson.

Opinion:
HUGHES, J.
By the terms of his will, it is made very clear that this expense was to be made a charge against his estate, and we entertain no doubt but that she is entitled to at least a judgment against his administrator requiring the allowance of this claim as a valid one against his estate.
The manner in which this claim will be paid and the property out of which the same shall be realized, is a matter to be worked out in the probate court by the administrator of his estate.
For these reasons, the demurrer should be overruled.
Before Judgese Hughes, Justice and Crow.