Case Name: Douglas SCHOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1994-08-17
Citations: 641 So. 2d 465
Docket Number: No. 93-3366
Parties: Douglas SCHOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ANSTEAD, KLEIN and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 641
Pages: 465–466

Head Matter:
Douglas SCHOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 93-3366.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Aug. 17, 1994.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Tanja Ostapoff, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Sarah B. Mayer, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We vacate defendant's sentence and remand for resentencing because of an error in the sentencing guidelines scoresheet. The scoresheet reflects that points were assessed for legal constraint based on an outstanding capias, however, the state did not establish that the capias was outstanding at the time these crimes were committed. Kinman v. State, 550 So.2d 1190, 1191 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).
Defendant also argues that the trial court failed to adequately determine whether his plea was voluntary. Because this is a direct appeal from a guilty plea, and defendant made no motion in the trial court to withdraw the plea, we affirm on that issue. Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898, 902 (Fla.1979).
REVERSED IN PART AND AFFIRMED IN PART.
ANSTEAD, KLEIN and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.