Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. David WARREN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-06-28
Citations: 533 F. App'x 487
Docket Number: No. 13-30560
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. David WARREN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 533
Pages: 487–488

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. David WARREN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-30560
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
June 28, 2013.
Holly A. Thomas, Esq., Jared H. Fish-man, Jessica Dunsay Silver, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Tracey Nicole Knight, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Michael W. Magner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Julian R. Murray, Jr., Chehardy, Sherman, Ellis, Murray, Recile, Griffith, Stake-lum & Hayes, L.L.P., Richard T. Simmons, Jr., Attorney, Hailey, McNamara, Hall, Larmann & Papale, L.L.P., Metairie, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before KING, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
David Warren appeals from the orders of the district court denying his motions for release pending trial and reopening of the initial detention proceeding. The denial of those motions was not an abuse of discretion. See United States v. Rueben, 974 F.2d 580, 586 (5th Cir.1992); United States v. Hare, 873 F.2d 796, 798 (5th Cir.1989).
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.