Case Name: Michael Tyrone PERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SCDC; Lee Ci; A.J. Padula, Warden; Captain Ronnie Cribb; SMU Administrator Bruce Oberman; William A. Byars, Director over SCDC; Doctor Edward Stahl; Nurse Administrator Yvonne McDonald; IGC C James, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-05-29
Citations: 521 F. App'x 272
Docket Number: No. 13-6402
Parties: Michael Tyrone PERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SCDC; Lee Ci; A.J. Padula, Warden; Captain Ronnie Cribb; SMU Administrator Bruce Oberman; William A. Byars, Director over SCDC; Doctor Edward Stahl; Nurse Administrator Yvonne McDonald; IGC C James, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 521
Pages: 272–273

Head Matter:
Michael Tyrone PERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SCDC; Lee Ci; A.J. Padula, Warden; Captain Ronnie Cribb; SMU Administrator Bruce Oberman; William A. Byars, Director over SCDC; Doctor Edward Stahl; Nurse Administrator Yvonne McDonald; IGC C James, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 13-6402.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 23, 2013.
Decided: May 29, 2013.
Michael Tyrone Perry, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Michael Pruitt, McDonald, Patrick, Poston, Hemphill & Roper, LLC, Greenwood, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael Tyrone Perry appeals the district court's orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying reconsidera tion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Perry v. South Carolina Dep't of Corr., No. 4:12-cv-01205-RMG, 2013 WL 681890 2013 WL 1010353 (D.S.C. Feb. 25 & Mar. 14, 2013). We also deny Perry's motions to assign counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.