Case Name: James COX, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-05-09
Citations: 191 S.W.3d 678
Docket Number: No. ED 86133
Parties: James COX, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 191
Pages: 678–678

Head Matter:
James COX, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 86133.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
May 9, 2006.
Nelson G. Wolff, Schlichter, Bogard & Denton, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Thomas E. Jones, James W. Erwin, Heath H. Hooks, Thompson Coburn LLP, Belleville, IL, for appellant.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict for plaintiff in a FELA case. The evidence in support of the jury verdict is not insufficient. No error of law appears.
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).