Case Name: Margaret T. PATTON, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Joseph M. TULEY, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-07-23
Citations: 85 S.W.3d 82
Docket Number: No. ED 79664
Parties: Margaret T. PATTON, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Joseph M. TULEY, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before GEORGE W. DRAPER III, P.J. and MARY R. RUSSELL and MARY K. HOFF, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 85
Pages: 82–83

Head Matter:
Margaret T. PATTON, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Joseph M. TULEY, Defendant/Respondent.
No. ED 79664.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
July 23, 2002.
Application for Transfer Denied Oct. 22, 2002.
Norman W. Pressman, Kathryn M. Koch, Goldstein & Pressman, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Mark T. Keaney, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before GEORGE W. DRAPER III, P.J. and MARY R. RUSSELL and MARY K. HOFF, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Margaret T. Patton (Contingent Beneficiary) appeals from the final judgment entered in favor of Joseph M. Tuley (Trustee) after a non-jury trial on Contingent Beneficiary's claim for an accounting, the removal of Trustee, and the appointment of a successor trustee.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).