Case Name: Tommy B. ALRASHADA, Appellant v. DC WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-07-27
Citations: 163 F. App'x 2
Docket Number: No. 04-7047
Parties: Tommy B. ALRASHADA, Appellant v. DC WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY, Appellee.
Judges: Before GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and ROGERS and TATEL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 163
Pages: 2–3

Head Matter:
Tommy B. ALRASHADA, Appellant v. DC WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY, Appellee.
No. 04-7047.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
July 27, 2005.
Rehearing Denied Oct. 12, 2005.
Tommy B. Alrashada, Baltimore, MD, pro se.
Grace E. Speights, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP, Washington, DC, for Appellee.
Before GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and ROGERS and TATEL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. See Fed. R.App. P. 86; D.C.Cir. Rule 36(b). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's order, filed March 17, 2004, dismissing appellant's complaint for failure to state a claim, be affirmed. Appellant failed to allege any of the necessary elements of a claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. See Duncan v. WMATA, 240 F.3d 1110, 1113-14 (D.C.Cir.2001). Appellant's allegations do not support an inference that appellee had notice of his alleged disability. Cf. Crandall v. Paralyzed Veterans of Am., 146 F.3d 894 (D.C.Cir.1998).
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.