Case Name: FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Petitioner, v. Bert SMITH, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1964-04-08
Citations: 162 So. 2d 663
Docket Number: No. 32766
Parties: FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Petitioner, v. Bert SMITH, Respondent.
Judges: DREW, C. J., and THORNAL, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 162
Pages: 663–663

Head Matter:
FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Petitioner, v. Bert SMITH, Respondent.
No. 32766.
Supreme Court of Florida.
April 8, 1964.
Bolles & Prunty, Miami, for petitioner.
Frates, Fay & Floyd, Miami, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Our initial consideration of the petition for certiorari suggested jurisdiction in this Court to review the decision of the District Court of 'Appeal, Third District, Smith v. Florida East Coast Railway Company, Fla. App., 151 So.2d 70. After oral argument and further careful consideration of the record and briefs, we have concluded that there is no jurisdictional conflict between the decision of the District Court of Appeal and any prior decision of this Court or another District Court of Appeal. The writ is, therefore, discharged.
It is so ordered.
DREW, C. J., and THORNAL, O'CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.
ROBERTS, J., dissents.