Case Name: Javier DIAZ-RAMOS, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-04-13
Citations: 404 F.3d 1118
Docket Number: No. 02-71208
Parties: Javier DIAZ-RAMOS, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before GOODWIN, BEEZER, and O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 404
Pages: 1118–1119

Head Matter:
Javier DIAZ-RAMOS, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 02-71208.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
April 13, 2005.
Christopher J. Stender, Esq., Stender & Associates, Phoenix, AZ, for Petitioner.
Regional Counsel, WEstern Region, Immigration & Naturalization Service, Lagu-na Niguel, CA, District Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Phoenix, AZ, STephen J. Flynn, Office of Immigration Litigation, OIL, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before GOODWIN, BEEZER, and O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.
Alberto R. Gonzales is substituted for his predecessor, John Ashcroft, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
In light of Lanza v. Ashcroft, 389 F.3d 917 (9th Cir.2004), the motion of the Attorney General to remand this case to the Board of Immigration Appeals for a clarification of the grounds for its affirmance of the Immigration Judge's denial of Diaz-Ramos' cancellation of removal application is GRANTED. This Court will not entertain any further appeals by petitioner concerning whether his removal would result in exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his United States citizen children. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(b); see Romero-Tor res v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 888 (9th Cir.2003).
The case, presently set for oral argument on April 15, 2005, in San Francisco, California, is removed from the oral argument calendar.
VACATED and REMANDED.