Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Fred Hertz, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1976-01-09
Citations: 85 Misc. 2d 1036
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Fred Hertz, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 85
Pages: 1036–1037

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Fred Hertz, Respondent.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
January 9, 1976
Denis Dillon, District Attorney (Thomas A. Adams of counsel), for appellant. James J. McDonough, Matthew Muraskin and Harry D. Hersh for respondent.

Opinion:
Memorandum. Order dismissing information unanimously reversed on the law, information reinstated and matter remanded for trial.
In our opinion, section 270.05 of the Penal Law does not violate due process by reason of its being overly broad (People v Duskin, NYLJ, May 19, 1975, p 19, col 2).
Concur: Glickman, P.J., Pittoni and Gagliardi, JJ.