Case Name: In Re: Steven C. STERLING, Debtor. Steven C. Sterling; Laura M. Sterling, Appellants, v. Lawrence L. Rosen, Appellee, and Herbert Beskins, Trustee-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-04-28
Citations: 275 F. App'x 222
Docket Number: No. 07-2016
Parties: In Re: Steven C. STERLING, Debtor. Steven C. Sterling; Laura M. Sterling, Appellants, v. Lawrence L. Rosen, Appellee, and Herbert Beskins, Trustee-Appellee.
Judges: Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Bankruptcy Reporter
Volume: 392
Pages: 222–223

Head Matter:
In Re: Steven C. STERLING, Debtor. Steven C. Sterling; Laura M. Sterling, Appellants, v. Lawrence L. Rosen, Appellee, and Herbert Beskins, Trustee-Appellee.
No. 07-2016.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 24, 2008.
Decided: April 28, 2008.
Steven C. Sterling, Laura M. Sterling, Appellants Pro Se. Charles Albert Price, Cregger & Lazarus, Annandale, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Steven C. Sterling and Laura M. Sterling appeal from the district court's order affirming the bankruptcy court's order lifting the automatic stay with respect to his residence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sterling v. Beskins, No. 3:07-cr-00039-nkm, 2007 WL 2915170 (W.D.Va. Oct. 4, 2007). We deny the Appellants' motion for preparation of a transcript at government expense, and dis pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately-presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.