Case Name: Warren KATZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HOLLAND AND KNIGHT, LLP.; Thomas M. Brownell, Esq.; Jocelyn W. Brittin, Esq., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-07-29
Citations: 389 F. App'x 306
Docket Number: No. 10-1119
Parties: Warren KATZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HOLLAND AND KNIGHT, LLP.; Thomas M. Brownell, Esq.; Jocelyn W. Brittin, Esq., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 389
Pages: 306–307

Head Matter:
Warren KATZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HOLLAND AND KNIGHT, LLP.; Thomas M. Brownell, Esq.; Jocelyn W. Brittin, Esq., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 10-1119.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 22, 2010.
Decided: July 29, 2010.
Warren Katz, Appellant Pro Se. John Thorpe Richards, Jr., Robert P. Trout, Trout Cacheris, PLLC, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Warren Katz appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil action based on res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Katz v. Holland & Knight, LLP, No. 1:09-cv-01106-TSE-IDD (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 8, 2010 & entered Jan. 11, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.