Case Name: ARTESIAN WELL AND EQUIPMENT CO., INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ARCHITECTURAL TILING CO., INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1949-10-17
Citations: 3 N.J. 4
Docket Number: 
Parties: ARTESIAN WELL AND EQUIPMENT CO., INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ARCHITECTURAL TILING CO., INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 3
Pages: 4–4

Head Matter:
ARTESIAN WELL AND EQUIPMENT CO., INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ARCHITECTURAL TILING CO., INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Argued October 10, 1949
Decided October 17, 1949.
Mr. William S. Grimaldi argued the cause for the appellant (Mr. Raymond G. Becker, attorney).
Mr. Ilenry Pomerehne argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Brody ,& Brody, attorneys).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge McGeehan in the court below. '
For affirmance—Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Case, Hehee, Oliphant, Waciieneeld, Bueling and Ackeeson—7.
For reversal—Hone.