Case Name: Pedro MENENDEZ, Appellant, v. AETNA INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1962-10-17
Citations: 311 F.2d 437
Docket Number: No. 19139
Parties: Pedro MENENDEZ, Appellant, v. AETNA INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 311
Pages: 437–438

Head Matter:
Pedro MENENDEZ, Appellant, v. AETNA INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.
No. 19139.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
Oct. 17, 1962.
Rehearing Denied Dec. 20, 1962.
John P. Corcoran, Jr., William E. Henson, Jr., Tampa, Fla., for appellant.
Morris E. White, William A. Gillen, Fowler, White, Gillen, Humkey & Trenam, Tampa, Fla., for appellee.
Before CAMERON and BELL, Circuit Judges, and CARSWELL, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We conclude from a careful review of the entire record that the District Court's dismissal of the complaint must " be reversed for the reasons stated in our opinion of this date in the case of Menendez Rodriguez v. Pan American Life Insurance Company and (Vento Jaime v. Pan American Life Insurance Company) 5 Cir., 311 F.2d 429.
The residual questions of law in this case not specifically dealt with in our opinion above are more properly determinable by the District Court upon full hearing on the merits.
This cause is reversed and remanded with directions for further proceedings not inconsistent with our opinion in the Rodriguez case.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.