Case Name: James M. DEBARDELEBEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Walter E. BLACK, Jr., U.S. District Judge; Juliet A. Eurich, Assistant U.S. Attorney, District of Maryland; Tarra Deshields-Minnis, Assistant United States Attorney, District of Maryland; Robert D. Bernardi, Prosecutor, Burlington County, New Jersey; Jack Johnson, States Attorney; George A. Swope, Police Sergeant, Prince George's County, Maryland, in their individual and official capacities, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-03-15
Citations: 5 F. App'x 302
Docket Number: No. 00-7596
Parties: James M. DEBARDELEBEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Walter E. BLACK, Jr., U.S. District Judge; Juliet A. Eurich, Assistant U.S. Attorney, District of Maryland; Tarra Deshields-Minnis, Assistant United States Attorney, District of Maryland; Robert D. Bernardi, Prosecutor, Burlington County, New Jersey; Jack Johnson, States Attorney; George A. Swope, Police Sergeant, Prince George’s County, Maryland, in their individual and official capacities, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 5
Pages: 302–302

Head Matter:
James M. DEBARDELEBEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Walter E. BLACK, Jr., U.S. District Judge; Juliet A. Eurich, Assistant U.S. Attorney, District of Maryland; Tarra Deshields-Minnis, Assistant United States Attorney, District of Maryland; Robert D. Bernardi, Prosecutor, Burlington County, New Jersey; Jack Johnson, States Attorney; George A. Swope, Police Sergeant, Prince George’s County, Maryland, in their individual and official capacities, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 00-7596.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 8, 2001.
Decided March 15, 2001.
James M. Debardeleben, pro se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, Allen F. Loucks, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, MD, for appellees.
Before DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
James M. Debardeleben appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Debardeleben v. Black, No. CA-00-2391-WMN (D.Md. filed Sept. 7, 2000; entered Sept. 8, 2000). Debardeleben's motion to file a supplemental pro se brief is denied, and his motion for decision is denied as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.