Case Name: Seymour v. Daniel, ordinary, for use, etc.
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1895-07-29
Citations: 97 Ga. 328
Docket Number: 
Parties: Seymour v. Daniel, ordinary, for use, etc.
Judges: 
Reporter: Georgia Reports
Volume: 97
Pages: 328–328

Head Matter:
Seymour v. Daniel, ordinary, for use, etc.
July 29, 1895.
By two Justices.
■ Action on bond. Before Judge Reese. Madison superior court. September term, 1894.
David W. Meadow, for plaintiff, in error.
Jolm J. Strickland, contra.

Opinion:
Simmons, C. J.
Most of the numerous grounds of the motion for a new trial fail entirely to plainly and distinctly set forth the errors complained of, but on the contrary, are too vague, con- . fused, indefinite and unintelligible for consideration by this, court; in none of the grounds does it appear that any error requiring a new trial was committed; the evidence was sufficient to warrant the verdict, and it having been approved by the trial judge, this court will not set it aside.
Judgment affirmed.