Case Name: Robin GLACKIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-06-12
Citations: 367 S.W.3d 674
Docket Number: No. ED 95722
Parties: Robin GLACKIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 367
Pages: 674–674

Head Matter:
Robin GLACKIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 95722.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
June 12, 2012.
Jo Ann Rotermund, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Karen L. Kramer, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Robin Glackin (Movant) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Charles County denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant claims that the motion court erred in denying his motion for post-conviction relief because the plea court lacked authority to accept his guilty plea entered more than 180 days after he filed his request for disposition of detainers pursuant to the Uniform Mandatory Disposition of Detain-ers Law (UMDDL).
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court's decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).