Case Name: Elizabeth M. Phair, appellant, v. Henry J. Melosh et al., exrs., &c., respondents
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1940-01-25
Citations: 127 N.J. Eq. 15
Docket Number: 
Parties: Elizabeth M. Phair, appellant, v. Henry J. Melosh et al., exrs., &c., respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 127
Pages: 15–15

Head Matter:
Elizabeth M. Phair, appellant, v. Henry J. Melosh et al., exrs., &c., respondents.
[Decided January 25th, 1940.]
Mr. Fred A. Lorentz (Mr. Merritt Lane, of counsel), for the appellant.
Messrs. Melosh, Morten & Melosh (Mr. Louis G. Morten, of counsel), for the respondent Henry J. Melosh, executor.
Messrs. Qollins ¡& Corbin (Mr. Edward A. Marlcley and Mr. Raymond J. Lamb, of counsel), for the respondent Louise W. Melosh, executrix.

Opinion:
Pee Cueiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fielder, and reported in 125 N. J. Eq. 497.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justioe, Tbehchaed, Case, Bodihe, Dohges, Hehee, Peeskie, Poetee, Heteield, Deae, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeeety, Hague, JJ. 14.
For reversal — Hone.