Case Name: Cabot HEMP, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-03-09
Citations: 129 S.W.3d 404
Docket Number: No. ED 82671
Parties: Cabot HEMP, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 129
Pages: 404–405

Head Matter:
Cabot HEMP, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 82671.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
March 9, 2004.
Edward Scott Thompson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Leslie E. McNamara, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Cabot Hemp appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post- conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. He asserts his guilty plea was involuntary because his attorney misinformed him about a plea consequence.
Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 24.085(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).