Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Andrew COLSON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-03-10
Citations: 558 F.3d 1010
Docket Number: No. 08-10287
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Andrew COLSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: ALEX KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, HAWKINS and RONALD M. GOULD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 558
Pages: 1010–1010

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Andrew COLSON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-10287.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 23, 2009.
Filed March 10, 2009.
Franny A. Forsman, Federal Public Defender, Jason F. Carr, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Las Vegas, NV, for the appellant.
Gregory A. Browner, United States Attorney, Peter S. Levitt, Assistant United States Attorney, Las Vegas, NV, for the appellee.
Before: ALEX KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, HAWKINS and RONALD M. GOULD, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
ORDER
Andrew Colson ("Colson") appeals from the district court's decision regarding a discretionary reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Colson acknowledges that the district court's decision is not reviewable under United States v. Lowe, 136 F.3d 1231, 1233 (9th Cir.1998), but argues that Lowe is no longer good law in light of United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).
We find no conflict between Carty and Lowe, and we affirm that Lowe remains binding. Accordingly, the government's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction is granted.
DISMISSED.