Case Name: Jose Danilo CRUZ and Richard Manuel Milian, Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-05-04
Citations: 617 So. 2d 454
Docket Number: No. 92-934
Parties: Jose Danilo CRUZ and Richard Manuel Milian, Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before BASKIN, FERGUSON and LEVY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 617
Pages: 454–454

Head Matter:
Jose Danilo CRUZ and Richard Manuel Milian, Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 92-934.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 4, 1993.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Harvey J. Sepler, Asst. Public Defender, for appellants.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Stephanie G. Kolman, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before BASKIN, FERGUSON and LEVY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We vacate defendants' sentences because the court imposed sentences in excess of the statutory maximum for second degree misdemeanors. Shaktman v. State, 529 So.2d 711, 723 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), approved, 553 So.2d 148 (Fla.1989); § 775.-082(4)(b), Fla.Stat. (1989).
Defendants' remaining point lacks merit. William v. State, 591 So.2d 664 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Flanagan v. State, 536 So.2d 275 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).
Convictions affirmed; sentences vacated; remanded for resentencing.