Case Name: Arthur O. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. B.R. TAYLOR, Defendant-Appellee; Arthur O. Armstrong, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. B.R. Taylor, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-05-08
Citations: 8 F. App'x 270
Docket Number: Nos. 00-2559, 00-2560
Parties: Arthur O. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. B.R. TAYLOR, Defendant-Appellee. Arthur O. Armstrong, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. B.R. Taylor, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 8
Pages: 270–271

Head Matter:
Arthur O. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. B.R. TAYLOR, Defendant-Appellee. Arthur O. Armstrong, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. B.R. Taylor, Defendant-Appellee.
Nos. 00-2559, 00-2560.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 10, 2001.
Decided May 8, 2001.
Arthur O. Armstrong, pro se.
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In these consolidated appeals, Arthur O. Armstrong appeals district court orders denying leave to file complaints against Police Officer B.R. Taylor. We have reviewed the record and the district court orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We also deny Armstrong's motions for summary judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.