Case Name: The State, ex rel. Tran, Appellant, v. McMackin, Warden, Appellee
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1991-12-04
Citations: 62 Ohio St. 3d 165
Docket Number: No. 90-2043
Parties: The State, ex rel. Tran, Appellant, v. McMackin, Warden, Appellee.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 62
Pages: 165–166

Head Matter:
The State, ex rel. Tran, Appellant, v. McMackin, Warden, Appellee.
[Cite as State, ex rel. Tran, v. McMackin (1991), 62 Ohio St.3d 165.]
(No. 90-2043
Submitted June 26, 1991
Decided December 4, 1991.)
Quang Ly Tran, pro se.
Lee I. Fisher, Attorney General, and John J. Gideon, for appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
On appeal, appellant argues that his conviction was obtained through fraud and trickery of the state and his court-appointed counsel. These allegations do not attack the jurisdiction of the sentencing court and are not grounds for issuing a writ of habeas corpus. See R.C. 2725.05 and State, ex rel. Justice, v. McMackin (1990), 53 Ohio St.3d 72, 558 N.E.2d 1183.
Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.