Case Name: In the Matter of the Compensation of Randy R. Westfall, Claimant. Randy R. WESTFALL, Petitioner on Review, v. RUST INTERNATIONAL and Underwriters Adjusting Company, Respondents on Review
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1991-08-22
Citations: 312 Or. 34
Docket Number: WCB 88-01147; CA A62442; SC S37923
Parties: In the Matter of the Compensation of Randy R. Westfall, Claimant. Randy R. WESTFALL, Petitioner on Review, v. RUST INTERNATIONAL and Underwriters Adjusting Company, Respondents on Review.
Judges: 
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 312
Pages: 34–34

Head Matter:
On petition for review filed March 6,
petition for review allowed; the decision of the Court of Appeals vacated and remanded to Court of Appeals for further consideration August 22, 1991
In the Matter of the Compensation of Randy R. Westfall, Claimant. Randy R. WESTFALL, Petitioner on Review, v. RUST INTERNATIONAL and Underwriters Adjusting Company, Respondents on Review.
(WCB 88-01147; CA A62442; SC S37923)
815 P2d 1272
David C. Force of Vick & Gutzler, Salem, filed the petition for petitioner on review.
Bradley R. Scheminske, of Scheminske & Lyons, Portland, filed the response for respondents on review.
David Gernant, Portland, filed a brief for amicus curiae Oregon Trial Lawyers Association.
Appeal from the Court of Appeals’ Order Awarding Attorney Fee dated January 30,1991.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of this court's opinion in Mattiza v. Foster, 311 Or 1, 803 P2d 723 (1990).