Case Name: THOMAS B. JONES v. ARMIDA B. SMITH DIEKER, ALSO KNOWN AS ARMIDA B. SMITH, EMMA KWOCK CHUN AND BANK OF HAWAII
Court: Supreme Court of the Territory of Hawaii
Jurisdiction: Hawaii
Decision Date: 1952-07-21
Citations: 39 Haw. 481
Docket Number: NOS. 2817 and 2821
Parties: THOMAS B. JONES v. ARMIDA B. SMITH DIEKER, ALSO KNOWN AS ARMIDA B. SMITH, EMMA KWOCK CHUN AND BANK OF HAWAII.
Judges: Le Baron and Stainback, JJ., and Circuit Judge Broavn in place of Toavse, C. J., Disqualified.
Reporter: Hawaii Reports
Volume: 39
Pages: 481–481

Head Matter:
THOMAS B. JONES v. ARMIDA B. SMITH DIEKER, ALSO KNOWN AS ARMIDA B. SMITH, EMMA KWOCK CHUN AND BANK OF HAWAII.
NOS. 2817 and 2821.
Filed July 15, 1952.
Decided July 21, 1952.
Le Baron and Stainback, JJ., and Circuit Judge Broavn in place of Toavse, C. J., Disqualified.
F. Schnach and H. C. Schnach for petition.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This is a petition for a rehearing of the cause on appeal determined by this court in its opinion recorded at page 448, ante, in so far as that cause pertains to the issue of constructive eviction. The petition seeks to have this court reconsider that issue of fact which the petitioner presented on appeal. It does so even though such issue heretofore has been ably and exhaustively briefed and argued by counsel and fully considered and determined by this court after meticulous review of the record. But it cites no authorities warranting reconsideration and constitutes nothing more than an extensive reargument of matters finally concluded. Thus, the petition is purely argumentative in character and no useful purpose Avould be served by considering it further.
Petition denied without argument.