Case Name: Frederick INGRAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-06-19
Citations: 580 So. 2d 896
Docket Number: No. 90-1093
Parties: Frederick INGRAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: HERSEY, C.J., and ANSTEAD and WARNER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 580
Pages: 896–897

Head Matter:
Frederick INGRAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 90-1093.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
June 19, 1991.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Anthony Calvello, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Douglas J. Glaid, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm appellant's conviction and sentence. Although we agree with appellant that the trial court erred in allowing a prosecution witness to be impeached, we find such error to be harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986). Our conclusion is mainly predicated upon the admission of other substantial evidence concerning the witness' prior identification of the appellant as his assailant.
HERSEY, C.J., and ANSTEAD and WARNER, JJ., concur.