Case Name: Kevin P. WILSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2015-05-12
Citations: 477 S.W.3d 1
Docket Number: No. ED 101216
Parties: Kevin P. WILSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 477
Pages: 1–2

Head Matter:
Kevin P. WILSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 101216
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
FILED: May 12, 2015
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied June 23, 2015
Application for Transfer Denied September 22, 2015
Srikant Chigurupati, Missouri Public Defender Office, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Evan Joseph Buchheim, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Kevin P. Wilson (Movant) appeals from the motion court's Findings of Fact, Con- elusions of Law and Judgment on Movant's Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence and Request . for Evidentiary Hearing denying Movant's Rule 29.15 claims for post-conviction relief. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating, the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).