Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Carl Doron WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-04-19
Citations: 686 F. App'x 630
Docket Number: No. 16-13210 Non-Argument Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Carl Doron WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before HULL, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 686
Pages: 630–631

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Carl Doron WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-13210 Non-Argument Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
(April 19, 2017)
David Charles Waterman, Arthur Lee Bentley, III, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, Andrew C. Searle, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Orlando, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee
James Carl Doron Williams, AUSP Thomson Satellite Camp, Thomson, IL, for Defendant-Appellant
Before HULL, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Aaron Baghdadi, appointed counsel for James Williams in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the en tire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Williams's conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. Because we have concluded that no arguable issues of merit exist, Williams's motions for appointment of new counsel and relief under Fed. R. App. P. 31 are DENIED as moot.