Case Name: Robert A. DOUGLAS, Victor Neal and Carl Cook, Appellants, v. Chapelle A. BRONSON and State of Florida, Department of Business and Professional Regulations, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2015-12-01
Citations: 178 So. 3d 552
Docket Number: No. 1D15-4362
Parties: Robert A. DOUGLAS, Victor Neal and Carl Cook, Appellants, v. Chapelle A. BRONSON and State of Florida, Department of Business and Professional Regulations, Appellees.
Judges: ROBERTS, C. J., SWANSON and MAKAR, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 178
Pages: 552–552

Head Matter:
Robert A. DOUGLAS, Victor Neal and Carl Cook, Appellants, v. Chapelle A. BRONSON and State of Florida, Department of Business and Professional Regulations, Appellees.
No. 1D15-4362.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Dec. 1, 2015.
Candace W. Padgett and Leonard T. Hackett, of Vernis & Bowling of North Florida, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellants.
Archibald J. Thomas, III, Samuel B. Kanupp and Ronald Angerer, II, of Thomas & Klink, Jacksonville, for Appellees (no appearances).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of appellants' response to the order of October 1, 2015, the Court has determined that the order on appeal is not subject to appellate review pursuant to Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(C)(x) or (xi) because the order does not make a determination, as a matter of law, that a party is not entitled to either immunity under section 768.28(9), Florida Statutes, or sovereign immunity. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
ROBERTS, C. J., SWANSON and MAKAR, JJ., concur.