Case Name: Claude HOLLAND; Lori Holland, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. State of MARYLAND; R. Hunter Nelms, Jr.; Robert Van Meter, Major, Defendants-Appellees, and Wicomico County Sheriff's Department, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-04-06
Citations: 373 F. App'x 335
Docket Number: No. 08-2377
Parties: Claude HOLLAND; Lori Holland, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. State of MARYLAND; R. Hunter Nelms, Jr.; Robert Van Meter, Major, Defendants-Appellees, and Wicomico County Sheriff's Department, Defendant.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 373
Pages: 335–335

Head Matter:
Claude HOLLAND; Lori Holland, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. State of MARYLAND; R. Hunter Nelms, Jr.; Robert Van Meter, Major, Defendants-Appellees, and Wicomico County Sheriff's Department, Defendant.
No. 08-2377.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 23, 2010.
Decided: April 6, 2010.
Robin R. Cockey, Cockey, Brennan & Maloney, P.C., Salisbury, Maryland, for Appellants. Douglas F. Gansler, Attorney General of Maryland, H. Scott Curtis, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Claude and Lori Holland, husband and wife, filed suit against Defendants alleging state and federal law causes of action relating to Claude's suspension and termination from his position with the Wicomico County Sheriffs Office. The district court granted summary judgment for Defendants finding the Hollands' claims were barred by res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Holland v. Maryland, No. 1:07-cv-03040-AMD (D.Md. Dec. 5, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.