Case Name: Clarence SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1988-01-20
Citations: 518 So. 2d 973
Docket Number: No. 86-1644
Parties: Clarence SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 518
Pages: 973–974

Head Matter:
Clarence SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 86-1644.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Jan. 20, 1988.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and John T. Kilcrease, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert J. Krauss, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals the revocation of his probation. We affirm, but remand for correction of a technical error.
Although defendant contends that the trial court erred in revoking his probation without a sufficient basis, we find that there was sufficient competent evidence to support the revocation.
Defendant also contends, and the state agrees, that the judgment entered after revocation of probation incorrectly lists the burglary conviction as a second degree felony rather than a third degree felony. This should be corrected on remand.
The judgment is affirmed, but is remanded for correction as explained above.
SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.