Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan AGUILAR-PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-02-29
Citations: 470 F. App'x 551
Docket Number: No. 11-30172
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan AGUILAR-PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 470
Pages: 551–552

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan AGUILAR-PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-30172.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 21, 2012.
Filed Feb. 29, 2012.
Alison L. Gregoire, Assistant U.S., USYA-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Yakima, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Rebecca Louise Pennell, Esquire, Assistant Federal Public Defender, FDWAIDFederal Defenders of Eastern Washington & Idaho, Yakima, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Juan Aguilar-Perez appeals from the 77-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being in the United States after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Aguilar-Perez contends that his sentence was substantively unreasonable. His sentence at the low end of the Guidelines range was not substantively unreasonable in light of the totality of the circumstances and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.