Case Name: Daniel E. HEILY; Warren Heily; C.M. Welch, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. WOODCREST PROPERTIES, (partnership); General Partner, Woodcrest Properties; GVK Ventures, (Partnership); General Partner GVK Ventures; James D Todd; Houstin I Todd; V-K Properties, Inc.; Paul P. Vames, President, V-K Properties, Inc.; Ruth T Edwards, Secretary/Treasurer V-K Properties, Inc.; Stuanhope Properties, L.L.C.; V-K Properties of Virginia, (Partnership); General Partner, V-K Properties of Virginia; Sally Vent; Englewood Apartments, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-07-05
Citations: 437 F. App'x 239
Docket Number: No. 11-1062
Parties: Daniel E. HEILY; Warren Heily; C.M. Welch, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. WOODCREST PROPERTIES, (partnership); General Partner, Woodcrest Properties; GVK Ventures, (Partnership); General Partner GVK Ventures; James D Todd; Houstin I Todd; V-K Properties, Inc.; Paul P. Vames, President, V-K Properties, Inc.; Ruth T Edwards, Secretary/Treasurer V-K Properties, Inc.; Stuanhope Properties, L.L.C.; V-K Properties of Virginia, (Partnership); General Partner, V-K Properties of Virginia; Sally Vent; Englewood Apartments, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 437
Pages: 239–240

Head Matter:
Daniel E. HEILY; Warren Heily; C.M. Welch, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. WOODCREST PROPERTIES, (partnership); General Partner, Woodcrest Properties; GVK Ventures, (Partnership); General Partner GVK Ventures; James D Todd; Houstin I Todd; V-K Properties, Inc.; Paul P. Vames, President, V-K Properties, Inc.; Ruth T Edwards, Secretary/Treasurer V-K Properties, Inc.; Stuanhope Properties, L.L.C.; V-K Properties of Virginia, (Partnership); General Partner, V-K Properties of Virginia; Sally Vent; Englewood Apartments, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 11-1062.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 30, 2011.
Decided: July 5, 2011.
Daniel E. Heily; Warren Heily; C.M. Welch, Appellants Pro Se. William Enten-mann Shmidheiser, III, Lenhart & Oben-shain, PC, Harrisonburg, VA, for Appel-lees.
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Daniel E. Heily, Warren Heily, and C.M. Welch appeal the district court's order dismissing their civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Heily v. Woodcrest Properties, No. 5:10-cv-00094-gec (W.D.Va. Dec. 16, 2010). We deny Appellants' motions to strike Appellees' brief and to recuse their attorney. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.