Case Name: E. C. Wilcox, Plaintiff, v. Preston B. Gillett, as Judge of the District Court, etc., Defendant
Court: Kansas Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Kansas
Decision Date: 1913-01-18
Citations: 88 Kan. 645
Docket Number: No. 18,572
Parties: E. C. Wilcox, Plaintiff, v. Preston B. Gillett, as Judge of the District Court, etc., Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Kansas Reports
Volume: 88
Pages: 645–645

Head Matter:
E. C. Wilcox, Plaintiff, v. Preston B. Gillett, as Judge of the District Court, etc., Defendant.
No. 18,572.
Original proceeding in mandamus.
Opinion filed January 18, 1913.
Writ denied.
A. M. Harvey, J. E. Addington, ,and Frank Doster, all of Topeka, for the plaintiff.
T. A. Noftzger, of Anthony, A. L. Noble, and J. N. Tincher, both of Medicine Lodge, for the defendant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
Upon the showing made the court is of the opinion that the order made by the district court did not amount to a disbarment or suspension of the attorney, or to a denial of his right to be heard upon a formal application for a change of venue or for the selection of a judge pro tem. to try his cases. It can not be known at this time when a judgment will be reached in the disbarment case, but it is evident that the interval will be so considerable that no proceedings in the district court should be held in abeyance to await the result in that matter.
The application for a writ of mandamus is denied.