Case Name: Wesley Edward SMITH, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHARLESTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-01-30
Citations: 215 F. App'x 227
Docket Number: No. 06-2001
Parties: Wesley Edward SMITH, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHARLESTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 215
Pages: 227–227

Head Matter:
Wesley Edward SMITH, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHARLESTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 06-2001.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 15, 2006.
Decided: Jan. 30, 2007.
Wesley Edward Smith, III, Appellant Pro Se. Alice F. Paylor, Daniel Francis Blanchard, III, Rosen, Rosen & Hagood, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Wesley Edward Smith, III, seeks to appeal the district court's order adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his complaint for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Smith v. Charleston County School Dist., No. 2:06-cv-02177 (D.S.C. Sept. 5, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.