Case Name: Aedan McCARTHY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. M. PETTIFORD, Warden, FCI Bennettsville, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-09-16
Citations: 294 F. App'x 758
Docket Number: No. 08-6439
Parties: Aedan McCARTHY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. M. PETTIFORD, Warden, FCI Bennettsville, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 294
Pages: 758–759

Head Matter:
Aedan McCARTHY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. M. PETTIFORD, Warden, FCI Bennettsville, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 08-6439.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 11, 2008.
Decided: Sept. 16, 2008.
Aedan McCarthy, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Drake, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Ap-pellee.
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Aedan McCarthy, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McCarthy v. Pettiford, No. 8:07-cv-00243-MBS, 2008 WL 624915 (D.S.C. Mar. 4, 2008). We deny McCarthy's motion to place his appeal in abeyance pending completion of his transfer to another facility. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.