Case Name: David GRAHAM, Plaintiff-Respondent v. GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION, Defendant-Applicant
Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1993-01-07
Citations: 609 So. 2d 347
Docket Number: No. 24930-CW
Parties: David GRAHAM, Plaintiff-Respondent v. GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION, Defendant-Applicant.
Judges: Before SEXTON, BROWN and STEWART, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 609
Pages: 347–347

Head Matter:
David GRAHAM, Plaintiff-Respondent v. GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION, Defendant-Applicant.
No. 24930-CW.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.
Jan. 7, 1993.
Sutherland, Juge, Horack & Dwyer by Denis Paul Juge and Kristi Lyn Stroebel, New Orleans, for defendant-applicant.
Curtis Daniel Street, Monroe, for plaintiff-respondent.
Before SEXTON, BROWN and STEWART, JJ.

Opinion:
WRIT DENIED.
Upon a review of the record before us, the exercise of this court's supervisory jurisdiction is not warranted. Due to the unique nature of videotaped surveillance, this evidence is subject to discovery even though intended for impeachment purposes. Collins v. Crosby Group, Inc., 551 So.2d 42 (La.App. 1st Cir.1989), writs denied, 556 So.2d 39 (La.1990) and 556 So.2d 42 (La.1990).