Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lee MITCHELL, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-03-15
Citations: 421 F. App'x 743
Docket Number: No. 09-10318
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lee MITCHELL, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 421
Pages: 743–744

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lee MITCHELL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-10318.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 8, 2011.
Filed March 15, 2011.
Eric Johnson, Esquire, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Robert Lawrence Ellman, Esquire, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Adam McMeen Flake, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Michael V. Cristalli, Cristalli & Saggese, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Lee Mitchell appeals from the 84-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). We dismiss Mitchell's appeal.
Mitchell contends that the district court erred in calculating the Guidelines range by applying the 4-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(6) for use of a firearm in connection with another felony offense. We are precluded from reaching the merits of Mitchell's claim by a valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nunez, 228 F.3d 956, 958-59 (9th Cir.2000).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.