Case Name: ROBERT J. NEILLEY, T/A GRIFFITH CHEMICAL COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. JOSEPH P. WINBERRY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND KIEVITT BEVERAGE CO., INC., AND NICHOLAS MANDAK, ESQ., RECEIVER OF KIEVITT BEVERAGE CO., INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1962-12-17
Citations: 39 N.J. 36
Docket Number: 
Parties: ROBERT J. NEILLEY, T/A GRIFFITH CHEMICAL COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. JOSEPH P. WINBERRY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND KIEVITT BEVERAGE CO., INC., AND NICHOLAS MANDAK, ESQ., RECEIVER OF KIEVITT BEVERAGE CO., INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 39
Pages: 36–41

Head Matter:
ROBERT J. NEILLEY, T/A GRIFFITH CHEMICAL COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. JOSEPH P. WINBERRY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND KIEVITT BEVERAGE CO., INC., AND NICHOLAS MANDAK, ESQ., RECEIVER OF KIEVITT BEVERAGE CO., INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Argued November 7, 1962
Decided December 17, 1962.
Mr. Charles Rodgers argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Breslin and Breslin, attorneys; Mr. John J. Bres-lin, Jr., of counsel).
Mr. Robert II. Chester argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Bellinger and Chester, attorneys).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Sullivan in the Appellate Division.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Hane-man — 7.
For reversal — None.