Case Name: STATE EX REL. Emanuel RANDALL v. STATE of Louisiana
Court: Louisiana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 2017-09-15
Citations: 225 So. 3d 470
Docket Number: No. 2016-KH-0872
Parties: STATE EX REL. Emanuel RANDALL v. STATE of Louisiana
Judges: HUGHES, J., would grant in part.'
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 225
Pages: 470–471

Head Matter:
STATE EX REL. Emanuel RANDALL v. STATE of Louisiana
No. 2016-KH-0872
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
09/15/2017

Opinion:
ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS
PER CURIAM:
| denied. Relator does not identify an illegal term in his sentence, and therefore, his filing is properly construed as an application for post-conviction relief. See State v. Parker, 98-0256 (La. 5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694. As such, it is subject to the time limitation set forth in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Relator's application was not timely filed in the district court, and he fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.
Moreover, relator has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. See State ex rel. Randall v. State, 15-1974 (La. 2/3/17), 209 So.3d 698.
HUGHES, J., would grant in part.'