Case Name: Tyrell et al. v. Berdecia; Beck v. United States; Frank Adams & Co. et al. v. United States et al.; Cooper v. United States; G. L. Christian & Associates v. United States; Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co. et al. v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.; Chicago Metallic Manufacturing Co. v. Ekco Products Co., Inc.; Oppenheimer v. California; Smith v. United States; Peppentenzza v. Rhay, Penitentiary Superintendent; Mahurin v. Missouri
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1964-02-17
Citations: 376 U.S. 929
Docket Number: No. 219; No. 479; No. 506; No. 531; No. 538; No. 598; No. 616; No. 528, Misc.; No. 653, Misc.; No. 693, Misc.; No. 704, Misc.
Parties: Tyrell et al. v. Berdecia, Beck v. United States, Frank Adams & Co. et al. v. United States et al., Cooper v. United States, G. L. Christian & Associates v. United States, Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co. et al. v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co., Chicago Metallic Manufacturing Co. v. Ekco Products Co., Inc., Oppenheimer v. California, Smith v. United States, Peppentenzza v. Rhay, Penitentiary Superintendent, Mahurin v. Missouri,
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 376
Pages: 929–929

Head Matter:
No. 219.
No. 479.
No. 506.
No. 531.
No. 538.
No. 598.
No. 616.
No. 528, Misc.
No. 653, Misc.
No. 693, Misc.
No. 704, Misc.
Tyrell et al. v. Berdecia, Beck v. United States, Frank Adams & Co. et al. v. United States et al., Cooper v. United States, G. L. Christian & Associates v. United States, Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co. et al. v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co., Chicago Metallic Manufacturing Co. v. Ekco Products Co., Inc., Oppenheimer v. California, Smith v. United States, Peppentenzza v. Rhay, Penitentiary Superintendent, Mahurin v. Missouri,

Opinion:
375 U. S. 881;
375 U. S. 972;
375 U. S. 215;
375 U. S. 964;
375 U. S. 954;
375 U. S. 969;
375 U. S. 970;
375 U. S. 975;
375 U. S. 988;
375 U. S. 959; and
375 U. S. 977. Petitions for rehearing denied.