Case Name: Sandra HILL, Petitioner, v. James HILL, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2001-01-25
Citations: 778 So. 2d 967
Docket Number: No. SC00-1440
Parties: Sandra HILL, Petitioner, v. James HILL, Respondent.
Judges: WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 778
Pages: 967–970

Head Matter:
Sandra HILL, Petitioner, v. James HILL, Respondent.
No. SC00-1440.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Jan. 25, 2001.
Nancy N. Nowlis of Zisser, Robison, Brown, Nowlis, and Maciejewski, P.A., Jacksonville, FL, for Petitioner.
John M. Merrett, Jacksonville, FL, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner seeks review of Hill v. Hill, 765 So.2d 99 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), based on express and direct conflict with In re Adoption of A.M.L., 297 So.2d 840 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974), and Gregory v. Gregory, 289 So.2d 468, 469 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974). She relies on article V, section 3(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution. Because we find no express and direct conflict between these opinions within the four corners of the decision, we deny the petition for review.
It is so ordered.
WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
PARIENTE, J., concurs specially with an opinion, in which LEWIS, J., concurs.