Case Name: Finch et al. v. Armstrong
Court: South Dakota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: South Dakota
Decision Date: 1896-10-17
Citations: 9 S.D. 273
Docket Number: 
Parties: Finch et al. v. Armstrong.
Judges: Haney, J., dissenting.
Reporter: South Dakota Reports
Volume: 9
Pages: 273–273

Head Matter:
Finch et al. v. Armstrong.
(Opinion filed Oct. 17, 1896.)
Appeal from circuit court, Brookings county. Hon. J O Andrews, Judge.
Action by George R. Finch and others against John Armstrong. From an order discharging an attachment, plaintiffs appeal.
Reversed.
Mor$hy, Ewing, Gilbert <& Ewing, A. 8. Mitchell, Charles S. Whiting and P. C. Truman, for appellants.
Chas. A. Savage and Cheever & Hall, for respondent.

Opinion:
Fuller, J.
That the over due debt upon which this action was brought, was incurred for property obtained under false pretenses, was one of the grounds upon which an attachment issued, and this appeal is from an order of the circuit court discharging the same. In determining an appeal at this term from a similar order, in an action between the same parties, argued and submitted herewith, the law of this case was announced, Haney, J., .concurring specially. 9 S. D. 255, 68 N. W. 740. For the reasons there specified, the order appealed from is reversed.
Haney, J., dissenting.