Case Name: Charles A. McCredy, Respondent, v. Daniel Woodcock, as Attorney for Granville F. Dailey et al., Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1903-05-22
Citations: 175 N.Y. 481
Docket Number: 
Parties: Charles A. McCredy, Respondent, v. Daniel Woodcock, as Attorney for Granville F. Dailey et al., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 175
Pages: 481–481

Head Matter:
Charles A. McCredy, Respondent, v. Daniel Woodcock, as Attorney for Granville F. Dailey et al., Appellant.
McCredy v. Woodcock, 73 App. Div. 630, affirmed.
(Argued May 8, 1903;
decided May 22, 1903.)
Appeal from a judgment entered June 27, 1902, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department overruling defendant’s exceptions ordered to be heard in the first instance by the Appellate Division and directing judgment for the plaintiff upon the verdict. »
Peroival 8. Menken for appellant. '
Frederic R. Coudert, Jr., and John P. Murra/y for respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on authority of Hatch v. Central Nat. Bank (78 N. Y. 487); no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O'Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin and Yann, JJ.