Case Name: GRUNSPAN v. WALLING
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1910-02-11
Citations: 121 N.Y.S. 270
Docket Number: 
Parties: GRUNSPAN v. WALLING.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 121
Pages: 270–271

Head Matter:
GRUNSPAN v. WALLING.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
February 11, 1910.)
Pleading (§ 327 )—Bill of Particulars.
Plaintiff cannot be compelled by a bill of particulars to elect on which promise she will rely.
[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Pleading, Cent. Dig. § 994; Dec. Dig. § 327. ]
Appeal from Special Term, New York County.
Action by Anna B. Grunspan against William E. Walling. Broman order granting a motion for an amended bill of particulars, plaintiff appeals.
Reversed, and motion denied.
Argued before INGRAHAM, P. J., and LAUGHLIN, CLARKE,. SCOTT, and MILLER, JJ.
Arthur M. Wickwire, for appellant;
Emil E. Fuchs, for respondent.
For other cases see same topic & § number in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep’r Indexes.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The court could not compel the plaintiff by a bill of particulars to elect on which promise she should rely.
The order should, therefore, be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with $10 costs.