Case Name: Dirk SCHMITZ, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. James Michael PRINCE, and Mid-States Aviation, L.L.C., Defendants/Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-09-28
Citations: 144 S.W.3d 893
Docket Number: No. ED 83684
Parties: Dirk SCHMITZ, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. James Michael PRINCE, and Mid-States Aviation, L.L.C., Defendants/Respondents.
Judges: Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 144
Pages: 893–894

Head Matter:
Dirk SCHMITZ, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. James Michael PRINCE, and Mid-States Aviation, L.L.C., Defendants/Respondents.
No. ED 83684.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Sept. 28, 2004.
Catherine E. Moore, Springfield, MO, for appellant.
J. Patrick O’Loughlin and Erica D. Koetting, Cape Girardeau, MO, for respondents.
Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff, Dirk Schmitz, appeals from the judgment, in a court-tried case, in favor of defendants, James Michael Prince and Mid-States Aviation, Inc., in his action for breach of contract, breach of warranty, and fraud against Prince and of negligence against Prince and Mid-States.
We have reviewed the record on appeal and find that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties, however, have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).