Case Name: Harry Meyerson, as a Stockholder of Rathbun & Bird Co., Inc., Suing in Behalf of Himself and for the Benefit of Said Corporation, Respondent, v. Rathbun & Bird Co., Inc., et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1964-04-21
Citations: 20 A.D.2d 878
Docket Number: 
Parties: Harry Meyerson, as a Stockholder of Rathbun & Bird Co., Inc., Suing in Behalf of Himself and for the Benefit of Said Corporation, Respondent, v. Rathbun & Bird Co., Inc., et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 20
Pages: 878–879

Head Matter:
Harry Meyerson, as a Stockholder of Rathbun & Bird Co., Inc., Suing in Behalf of Himself and for the Benefit of Said Corporation, Respondent, v. Rathbun & Bird Co., Inc., et al., Appellants.

Opinion:
Order, entered on February 18, 1964, denying motions by the several defendants to vacate plaintiff's notice of examination before trial, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to respondent. (See Nomako v. Ashton, 20 A D 2d 331.) Settle order on notice fixing date for examination to proceed. Concur — Breitel, J. P., McNally, Eager, Steuer and Staley, JJ.