Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. TERESA MARIE VILLA, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1991-05-22
Citations: 107 Or. App. 366
Docket Number: 88-3772-B-C-2; CA A63065
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. TERESA MARIE VILLA, Appellant.
Judges: Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Newman and Deits, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 107
Pages: 366–367

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted April 24,
reversed and remanded for a new hearing May 22, 1991
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. TERESA MARIE VILLA, Appellant.
(88-3772-B-C-2; CA A63065)
811 P2d 149
David K. Allen, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem.
Harrison Latto, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.
Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Newman and Deits, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant appeals from an order revoking her probation and sentencing her to 10 years in prison. She contends that she did not knowingly or intelligently waive her right to counsel at the revocation hearing. The state concedes that she is right, and we agree.
Reversed and remanded for a new hearing.
She also argues that the court should have sentenced her under the Sentencing Guidelines Board rules applicable after November 1, 1989. Because we do not know whether her probation will be revoked after a hearing or what sentence the court might impose if her probation is revoked, we do not address that issue.