Case Name: Edmund PRESCOTT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Mr. SHEARIN, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-02-28
Citations: 30 F. App'x 139
Docket Number: No. 01-7753
Parties: Edmund PRESCOTT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Mr. SHEARIN, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 30
Pages: 139–140

Head Matter:
Edmund PRESCOTT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Mr. SHEARIN, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 01-7753.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 12, 2002.
Decided Feb. 28, 2002.
Edmund Prescott, pro se.
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Edmund Prescott appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Prescott v. Shearin, No. CA-01-2714-L (D. Md. filed Sept. 26, 2001; entered Sept. 27, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.