Case Name: George Paul LAROQUE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Theodis BECK; James E. Langston; Theodore Walker; Heidi Galetschry, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-06-25
Citations: 328 F. App'x 257
Docket Number: No. 09-6588
Parties: George Paul LAROQUE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Theodis BECK; James E. Langston; Theodore Walker; Heidi Galetschry, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 328
Pages: 257–257

Head Matter:
George Paul LAROQUE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Theodis BECK; James E. Langston; Theodore Walker; Heidi Galetschry, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 09-6588.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 18, 2009.
Decided: June 25, 2009.
George Paul LaRoque, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
George Paul LaRoque' appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. LaRoque v. Beck, No. 5:09-ct-03025-H. (E.D.N.C. Mar. 3, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.