Case Name: Mario ROWELL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2014-05-06
Citations: 430 S.W.3d 334
Docket Number: No. ED 100217
Parties: Mario ROWELL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 430
Pages: 334–335

Head Matter:
Mario ROWELL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 100217.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
May 6, 2014.
Lisa M. Stroup, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Dora A. Fichter, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The movant, Mario Rowell, appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for postcon-viction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties' briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.
We affirm the motion court's judgment denying the movant's Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 84.16(b)(2).