Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Samuel CAMARILLO-TELLO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-10-22
Citations: 49 F. App'x 155
Docket Number: No. 01-30197; D.C. No. CR-99-00427-BJR
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Samuel CAMARILLO-TELLO, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before CHOY, FERGUSON, and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 49
Pages: 155–156

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Samuel CAMARILLO-TELLO, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 01-30197.
D.C. No. CR-99-00427-BJR.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 2, 2002.
Decided Oct. 22, 2002.
Before CHOY, FERGUSON, and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Samuel Camarillo-Tello appeals the sentence imposed by the district court following his guilty plea to illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He disputes the district court's decision to make a two-level downward departure under U.S.S.G. § 5K2.0, rather than a four-level departure as recommended by the Government. However, we lack jurisdiction to review the extent of the district court's downward departure. See United States v. Riggins, 40 F.3d 1055, 1058 (9th Cir.1994); United States v. Dickey, 924 F.2d 836, 838 (9th Cir.1991); United States v. Vizcarra-Angulo, 904 F.2d 22, 23 (9th Cir.1990). We, therefore, dismiss Camarillo-Tello's appeal.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.