Case Name: In the Matter of Edna Schopowitz et al., Appellants, v. Sidney B. Levitt et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 1.); In the Matter of William H. Kurland et al., Respondents, v. James M. Power et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents, and Edna Schopowitz et al., Appellants. (Proceeding No. 2.)
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1970-06-11
Citations: 34 A.D.2d 976
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Edna Schopowitz et al., Appellants, v. Sidney B. Levitt et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of William H. Kurland et al., Respondents, v. James M. Power et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents, and Edna Schopowitz et al., Appellants. (Proceeding No. 2.)
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 34
Pages: 976–977

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Edna Schopowitz et al., Appellants, v. Sidney B. Levitt et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of William H. Kurland et al., Respondents, v. James M. Power et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents, and Edna Schopowitz et al., Appellants. (Proceeding No. 2.)

Opinion:
—Consolidated proceedings as follows: Proceeding No. 1 is to invalidate petitions designating the following respondents as candidates in the Republican Party Primary Election to be held on June 23, 1970: Sidney B. Levitt for nomination for the public office of Member of the Assembly for the 40th Assembly District, Kings County; William H. Kurland and Fay Haieken for the Party position of Member of the State Committee, Male and Female respectively, for the 40th Assembly District, Kings County; and Pasquale DeBlasi, Jr., Maurice Brill, Irwin A. Rosenberg and Samuel Rubin for the Party position of Delegate to the Republican Judicial Convention, 2d Judicial District, for the 40th Assembly District, Kings County. Proceeding No. 2 is to validate the petitions designating said candidates for the said Party position of Member of the State Committee. The appeal is by petitioners in Proceeding No. 1, who are respondents in Proceeding No. 2, from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered June 5, 1970, which dismissed Proceeding No. 1 and granted the petition in Proceeding No. 2. Judgment affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Rabin, Acting P. J., Munder, Martuscello, Latham and Benjamin, JJ., concur.