Case Name: In re: GENERAL MOTORS CORP. SPEEDOMETER PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Court: United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-01-08
Citations: 530 F. Supp. 2d 1354
Docket Number: MDL No. 1896
Parties: In re: GENERAL MOTORS CORP. SPEEDOMETER PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION.
Judges: Before JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman, D. LOWELL JENSEN, J. FREDERICK MOTZ, ROBERT L. MILLER, JR., KATHRYN H. VRATIL, DAVID R. HANSEN and ANTHONY J. SCIRICA , Judges of the Panel.
Reporter: Federal Supplement 2d
Volume: 530
Pages: 1354–1355

Head Matter:
In re: GENERAL MOTORS CORP. SPEEDOMETER PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION.
MDL No. 1896.
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.
Jan. 8, 2008.
Before JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman, D. LOWELL JENSEN, J. FREDERICK MOTZ, ROBERT L. MILLER, JR., KATHRYN H. VRATIL, DAVID R. HANSEN and ANTHONY J. SCIRICA , Judges of the Panel.
Judge Scirica took no part in the disposition of this matter.

Opinion:
TRANSFER ORDER
JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.
Before the entire Panel*: Common defendant General Motors Corp. (GM) has moved, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, to centralize this litigation for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings in the Western District of Washington. Although agreeing that centralization was appropriate, all plaintiffs initially suggested selection of the Northern District of California as transferee district, but at the Panel hearing session plaintiffs acquiesced to selection of the Western District of Washington as transferee district.
This litigation presently consists of three actions listed on Schedule A and pending as follows: one action each in the Northern District of California, the District of Oregon and the Western District of Washington.
On the basis of the papers filed and the hearing session held, we find that the actions in this litigation involve common questions of fact, and that centralization under Section 1407 in the Western District of Washington will serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and promote the just and efficient conduct of the litigation. All actions share factual questions relating to whether (1) 2003-07 GM light pick-up trucks and sport utility vehicles have speedometers which register and display inaccurately, and (2) GM failed to disclose and/or fraudulently concealed this alleged defect. Centralization under Section 1407 will eliminate duplicative discovery; avoid inconsistent pretrial rulings; and conserve the resources of the parties, their counsel and the judiciary.
We further find that the Western District of Washington is an appropriate transferee district for this litigation, because (1) the action pending there is proceeding well, (2) this district has the capacity to handle this litigation, and (3) all parties now agree upon selection of this district as transferee forum.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, the actions listed on Schedule A and pending outside the Western District of Washington are transferred to the Western District of Washington and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable John C. Coughenour for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the action pending there and listed on Schedule A.
SCHEDULE A
MDL No. 1896—In re: General Motors Corp. Speedometer Products Liability Litigation
Northern District of California
Roy Falk, et al. v. General Motors Corp., C.A. No. 3:07-1731
District of Oregon
Robert W. Christensen, et al. v. General Motors Corp., C.A. No. 3:07-512
Western District of Washington
Kevin Zwicker, et al. v. General Motors Corp., C.A. No. 2:07-291