Case Name: Alphonso JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-05-16
Citations: 23 S.W.3d 641
Docket Number: No. ED 76121
Parties: Alphonso JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before MARY RHODES RUSSELL, C.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and CHARLES BLACKMAR, Sr.J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 23
Pages: 641–641

Head Matter:
Alphonso JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 76121.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
May 16, 2000.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 5, 2000.
Application for Transfer Denied Aug. 29, 2000.
Douglas R. Hoff, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before MARY RHODES RUSSELL, C.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and CHARLES BLACKMAR, Sr.J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Alphonso Jones ("Movant") appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for postcon-viction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We previously affirmed Movant's convictions for murder in the first degree, Section 565.020 RSMo 1994, and armed criminal action, Section 571.015 RSMo 1994, in State v. Jones, 959 S.W.2d 829, 831 (Mo.App.1997).
We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).