Case Name: Laurel M. NOWICKI, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Robert A. NOWICKI, Respondent/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-05-20
Citations: 110 S.W.3d 838
Docket Number: No. ED 81413
Parties: Laurel M. NOWICKI, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Robert A. NOWICKI, Respondent/Appellant.
Judges: Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J, and GLENN A. NORTON, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 110
Pages: 838–838

Head Matter:
Laurel M. NOWICKI, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Robert A. NOWICKI, Respondent/Appellant.
No. ED 81413.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
May 20, 2003.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 24, 2003.
James Jay Knappenberger, Clayton, MO, for Appellant.
W. Scott Pollard, Florissant, MO, for Respondent.
Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J, and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Robert A. Nowieki (Husband) appeals from the Judgment and Decree of Dissolution (Decree) entered by the trial court dissolving his marriage to Laurel M. Now-icki (Wife). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence. McGowan v. McGowan, 43 S.W.3d 857, 861 (Mo.App. E.D.2001). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have provided the parties with a memorandum for their use only setting forth the reasons for our decision. .We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).