Case Name: Henry Frederick Harris, Resp't, v. Union Elevated Railroad Company, App'lt
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1894-05-14
Citations: 59 N.Y. St. Rep. 883
Docket Number: 
Parties: Henry Frederick Harris, Resp’t, v. Union Elevated Railroad Company, App’lt.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 59
Pages: 883–883

Head Matter:
Henry Frederick Harris, Resp’t, v. Union Elevated Railroad Company, App’lt.

Opinion:
Pratt, J.
There are no questions of law that require discussion. The witness James was clearly incompetent to testify as to the change produced in the rental value of Hudson avenue by the construction of the road. The question of fact as to the amount of depreciation of the rental value by the road was determined favorably to defendant. The evidence would have justified a much larger verdict. We find no error, and the judgment is affirmed, with costs.