Case Name: William B. Slocum, Appellant, v. Catherine Domol et al., Respondents; Same Appellant v. William C. Veghts, Administrator, etc., Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1889-12-03
Citations: 117 N.Y. 647
Docket Number: 
Parties: William B. Slocum, Appellant, v. Catherine Domol et al., Respondents. Same Appellant v. William C. Veghts, Administrator, etc., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 117
Pages: 647–648

Head Matter:
William B. Slocum, Appellant, v. Catherine Domol et al., Respondents. Same Appellant v. William C. Veghts, Administrator, etc., Respondent.
(Argued November 25, 1889;
decided December 3, 1889.)
Motion to dismiss appeals from judgments in favor of defendants for failure to give the undertaking required by the statute of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made July 25, 1888.
A. & A. X. Fallon for motion.
William B. Slocum opposed.

Opinion:
Agree to dismiss; no opinion.
All concur.
Appeals dismissed.