Case Name: John S. STRITZINGER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA; Vernon Mc Wright; Charles Holliday; Brian Moynihan; United States of America; Walter Massey, Defendants-Appellees, and William Massey; Office of the President of the United States; Office of the Vice President of United States, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-08-01
Citations: 667 F. App'x 424
Docket Number: No. 16-1613
Parties: John S. STRITZINGER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA; Vernon Mc Wright; Charles Holliday; Brian Moynihan; United States of America; Walter Massey, Defendants-Appellees, and William Massey; Office of the President of the United States; Office of the Vice President of United States, Defendants.
Judges: Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 667
Pages: 424–424

Head Matter:
John S. STRITZINGER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA; Vernon Mc Wright; Charles Holliday; Brian Moynihan; United States of America; Walter Massey, Defendants-Appellees, and William Massey; Office of the President of the United States; Office of the Vice President of United States, Defendants.
No. 16-1613
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 28, 2016
Decided: August 1, 2016
John S. Stritzinger, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
John Stritzinger appeals the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation dismissing his complaint. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Strit-zinger's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, Stritzinger has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment and deny Stritzinger's motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED