Case Name: Disciplinary Counsel v. Medley
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2005-12-29
Citations: 108 Ohio St. 3d 1201
Docket Number: No. 2004-0082
Parties: Disciplinary Counsel v. Medley.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 108
Pages: 1201–1201

Head Matter:
Disciplinary Counsel v. Medley.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Medley, 108 Ohio St.3d 1201, 2005-Ohio-7135.]
(No. 2004-0082
Submitted December 22, 2005
Decided December 29, 2005.)

Opinion:
{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, William S. Medley, Attorney Registration No. 0031001, last known business address in Gallipolis, Ohio.
{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of December 8, 2004, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of eighteen months, six months stayed, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,
{¶ 3} IT IS ORDERED by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.
{¶ 4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.
{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Medley, 104 Ohio St.3d 251, 2004-Ohio-6402, 819 N.E.2d 273.
Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.