Case Name: Richard Earl ARMEL and Margaret Louise Armel, as parents and natural guardians of Cheryl Lee Armel, a minor, deceased, Appellants, v. KING SPRAY SERVICE, INC., a Florida corporation, and Harold Evans, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1966-06-21
Citations: 188 So. 2d 585
Docket Number: No. 65-983
Parties: Richard Earl ARMEL and Margaret Louise Armel, as parents and natural guardians of Cheryl Lee Armel, a minor, deceased, Appellants, v. KING SPRAY SERVICE, INC., a Florida corporation, and Harold Evans, Appellees.
Judges: Before HENDRY, C. J., and CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 188
Pages: 585–585

Head Matter:
Richard Earl ARMEL and Margaret Louise Armel, as parents and natural guardians of Cheryl Lee Armel, a minor, deceased, Appellants, v. KING SPRAY SERVICE, INC., a Florida corporation, and Harold Evans, Appellees.
No. 65-983.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
June 21, 1966.
Rehearing Denied July 15, 1966.
Fuller & Brumer, Kenneth L. Ryskamp, Miami, for appellants.
Wicker, Smith, Pyszka, Blomqvist & Da-vant, Miami, for appellees.
Before HENDRY, C. J., and CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See and compare: Cone v. Inter County Telephone & Telegraph Co., Fla.1949, 40 So.2d 148; Riddle v. Aero Mayflower Transit Co., Fla.1954, 73 So.2d 71; Davis v. Major Oil Company, Fla.App. 1964, 164 So.2d 558; City of Green Cove Springs v. Donaldson, 5th Cir.1965, 348 F.2d 197; 6 Am.Jur.2d, Assault and Battery, § 134.