Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Armando RODRIGUEZ-GONZALEZ, aka Javier Villasenor, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-01-18
Citations: 264 F. App'x 579
Docket Number: No. 07-10002
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Armando RODRIGUEZ-GONZALEZ, aka Javier Villasenor, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 264
Pages: 579–579

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Armando RODRIGUEZ-GONZALEZ, aka Javier Villasenor, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 07-10002.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 14, 2008 .
Filed Jan. 18, 2008.
Angela M. Martinez, USTU—Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Armando Rodriguez-Gonzalez, Florence, AZ, pro se.
Matthew Davidson, Esq., Nogales, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: HALL, O’SCANNLAIN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Armando Rodriguez-Gonzalez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 77-month sentence imposed for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Rodriguez-Gonzalez's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Rodriguez-Gonzalez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.