Case Name: CHIH HSIN TENG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michelle URIE, Clerk of the Southern Division, Defendant - Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-07-28
Citations: 329 F. App'x 767
Docket Number: No. 08-57035
Parties: CHIH HSIN TENG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michelle URIE, Clerk of the Southern Division, Defendant — Appellee.
Judges: Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 329
Pages: 767–767

Head Matter:
CHIH HSIN TENG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michelle URIE, Clerk of the Southern Division, Defendant — Appellee.
No. 08-57035.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 14, 2009.
Filed July 28, 2009.
Chih Hsin Teng, Fullerton, CA, pro se.
Robert I. Lester, Assistant U.S., United States Attorneys Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Chih Hsin Teng appeals pro se from the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against a court clerk for filing a court order. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Mullis v. U.S. Bankr.Court for Dist. of Nev., 828 F.2d 1385, 1388 (9th Cir.1987). We affirm.
The district court properly dismissed the action based on absolute quasi-judicial immunity. See id. at 1390 ("Court clerks have absolute quasi-judicial immunity from damages for civil rights violations when they perform tasks that are an integral part of the judicial process.").
Teng's remaining contentions are unpersuasive.
Teng's "petition second for early judgment" is denied as moot.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.