Case Name: Samuel C. STOIA, Appellant, v. Joseph H. FRANCIS and Janet M. Francis, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-07-12
Citations: 658 So. 2d 150
Docket Number: No. 94-2889
Parties: Samuel C. STOIA, Appellant, v. Joseph H. FRANCIS and Janet M. Francis, Appellees.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and LEVY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 658
Pages: 150–151

Head Matter:
Samuel C. STOIA, Appellant, v. Joseph H. FRANCIS and Janet M. Francis, Appellees.
No. 94-2889.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 12, 1995.
David A. Wolfson, Miami, for appellant.
Randolph W. Sadtler, Tavernier, for appel-lees.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and LEVY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We agree with the appellant purchaser that the issue of whether, taken together, the parties' written and faxed communications contained all the essential terms of an enforceable contract for the sale of real property was improperly resolved by a judgment on the pleadings for the defendants sellers. See Mehler v. Huston, 57 So.2d 836 (Fla.1952); Bluevack, Inc. v. Walter E. Heller & Co., 331 So.2d 359 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).
Accordingly the judgment is reversed for further consistent proceedings below.