Case Name: Edward THURMAN Plaintiff-Appellant v. QUEEN, Sergeant, NCU; Downing, Lieutenant, NCU; Spurlock, Sergeant, NCU; Stephen Williams, Warden, NCU; Billy Inman, Deputy Warden, NCU; Keith Day, Building Mayor; Dexter Payne, Deputy Director, ADC; Barbara Williams, Inmate Grievance Supervisor, ADC; John Doe, Corporal, NCU Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-01-05
Citations: 710 F. App'x 271
Docket Number: No. 17-1948
Parties: Edward THURMAN Plaintiff-Appellant v. QUEEN, Sergeant, NCU; Downing, Lieutenant, NCU; Spurlock, Sergeant, NCU; Stephen Williams, Warden, NCU; Billy Inman, Deputy Warden, NCU; Keith Day, Building Mayor; Dexter Payne, Deputy Director, ADC; Barbara Williams, Inmate Grievance Supervisor, ADC; John Doe, Corporal, NCU Defendants-Appellees
Judges: Before GRUENDER, MURPHY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 710
Pages: 271–271

Head Matter:
Edward THURMAN Plaintiff-Appellant v. QUEEN, Sergeant, NCU; Downing, Lieutenant, NCU; Spurlock, Sergeant, NCU; Stephen Williams, Warden, NCU; Billy Inman, Deputy Warden, NCU; Keith Day, Building Mayor; Dexter Payne, Deputy Director, ADC; Barbara Williams, Inmate Grievance Supervisor, ADC; John Doe, Corporal, NCU Defendants-Appellees
No. 17-1948
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: December 21, 2017.
Filed: January 5, 2018
Edward Thurman, Pro Se
Robert Thomas James, Attorney General’s Office, Little Rock, AR, for Defendants-Appellees
Before GRUENDER, MURPHY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Arkansas Department of Correction inmate Edward Thurman appeals after the district court adversely disposed of all of his claims, including dismissing some of his • claims without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Also before the panel are Thurman's motions for appointment of counsel and for admission and production of documents.
After careful review, we conclude that the district court appropriately disposed of Thurman's claims. See, e.g., King v. Iowa Dep't of Corr., 598 F.3d 1051, 1052 (8th Cir. 2010) (reviewing de novo dismissal for failure to exhaust administrative remedies). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Thurman's pending motions as moot.
. The Honorable D. P. Marshall Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Beth Deere, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.