Case Name: Mark Paul BEAL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2008-03-13
Citations: 978 So. 2d 825
Docket Number: No. 1D06-4471
Parties: Mark Paul BEAL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: WOLF and BENTON, JJ., CONCUR; PADOVANO, J., concurs in result with opinion.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 978
Pages: 825–827

Head Matter:
Mark Paul BEAL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D06-4471.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
March 13, 2008.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Terry P. Roberts, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
As the State recognizes, the trial court erred when it modified appellant's probation to include electronic monitoring where the modification occurred more than 60 days after the original sentence was rendered in violation of rule 3.800(c), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. See Schutte v. State, 824 So.2d 308 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). The amended order is reversed and the added condition is stricken.
WOLF and BENTON, JJ., CONCUR; PADOVANO, J., concurs in result with opinion.