Case Name: Sean TODD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David G. BISHOP, Chief of Police of City of Beaverton in Individual and Official Capacities, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-03-13
Citations: 224 F. App'x 659
Docket Number: No. 05-35380
Parties: Sean TODD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David G. BISHOP, Chief of Police of City of Beaverton in Individual and Official Capacities, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before: GOULD, PAEZ, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 224
Pages: 659–660

Head Matter:
Sean TODD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David G. BISHOP, Chief of Police of City of Beaverton in Individual and Official Capacities, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 05-35380.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 9, 2007.
Filed March 13, 2007.
Kevin N. Keaney, Portland, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Janet M. Schroer, Esq., Michael Vernon Tom, Esq., Hoffman Hart & Wagner, LLP, Portland, OR, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before: GOULD, PAEZ, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Plaintiff-Appellant Sean Todd appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee David G. Bishop in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that Bishop deprived him of a protected property interest in his continued employment with the Washington County Interagency Narcotics (WIN) Team without constitutionally sufficient due process.
Todd's assignment with the WIN Team was for a minimum of three years or until there was mutual agreement otherwise. Accordingly, Todd lacked a legitimate claim of entitlement to an assignment on the WIN Team beyond the three-year term he served. See Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577, 92 S.Ct. 2701, 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). Thus, he cannot establish a due process violation. See Engquist v. Oregon Dept. of Agric., 478 F.3d 985, 995-997 (9th Cir.2007).
Because Bishop did not violate Todd's due process rights, the judgment is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.