Case Name: RING ENGINEERING CO. v. OTIS ELEVATOR CO.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1950-01-23
Citations: 179 F.2d 812
Docket Number: No. 10116
Parties: RING ENGINEERING CO. v. OTIS ELEVATOR CO.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 179
Pages: 812–812

Head Matter:
RING ENGINEERING CO. v. OTIS ELEVATOR CO.
No. 10116.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued Dec. 14, 1949.
Decided Jan. 23, 1950.
Mr. James M. Earnest, Washington, D. C., for appellant.
Mr. Philip W. Amram, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Jerome J. Dick, Washington, D. G., was on the brief, for ap-pellee.
Before EDGERTON, CLARK, and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This case involves interpretation of a contract for installing elevators in an office building in Washington, D. C. We agree with the District Court's interpretation. Furthermore, appellant may not overturn a summary judgment by raising here an issue of fact that was not plainly disclosed as a genuine issue in the trial court. Fletcher v. Krise, 73 App.D.C. 266, 120 F.2d 809; Williams v. Kolb, 79 U.S.App.D.C. 253, 145 F.2d 344. Garrett Biblical Institute v. American University, 82 U.S.App.D.C., 265, 163 F.2d 265, is not to the contrary.
Affirmed.