Case Name: Randy HALEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2001-02-28
Citations: 787 So. 2d 59
Docket Number: No. 2D00-4064
Parties: Randy HALEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: NORTHCUTT, A.C.J., and CASANUEVA, J., and CAMPBELL, MONTEREY, (Senior) Judge, Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 787
Pages: 59–60

Head Matter:
Randy HALEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D00-4064.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Feb. 28, 2001.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Randy Haley appeals the summary denial of his postconviction motion. In his motion, Haley alleged that he was sentenced as a habitual offender during the Heggs window and that his gain time was illegally reduced under chapter 95-184, Laws of Florida, because Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000), invalidated chapter 95-184 in its entirety. We affirm the order of the trial court. Appellant must first present his claim administratively to the Department of Corrections; if he is dissatisfied with the result, he can file a petition for writ of mandamus in the circuit court in the county where he is incarcerated. See Clements v. State, 761 So.2d 1245 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Newsome v. Singletary, 637 So.2d 9 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).
Affirmed.
NORTHCUTT, A.C.J., and CASANUEVA, J., and CAMPBELL, MONTEREY, (Senior) Judge, Concur.