Case Name: CHARLES S. COFFINBERRY and JOHN H. SEAWELL, Respondents, v. JOHNSON HORRILL and SARAH N. HORRILL, Appellants
Court: Supreme Court of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1855
Citations: 5 Cal. 493
Docket Number: 
Parties: CHARLES S. COFFINBERRY and JOHN H. SEAWELL, Respondents, v. JOHNSON HORRILL and SARAH N. HORRILL, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Reports
Volume: 5
Pages: 493–493

Head Matter:
CHARLES S. COFFINBERRY and JOHN H. SEAWELL, Respondents, v. JOHNSON HORRILL and SARAH N. HORRILL, Appellants.
The rendition and entry of a judgment tiy the District Court at a time when there is no legal term of the Court, is error.
Appeal from the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District, Napa County.
Crocker & Robinson, for Appellants.
Boggs & Maupin, for Respondents.
No briefs on file.

Opinion:
Heydenfeldt, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.
Murray, C. J., concurred.
The error relied upon is the rendition and entry of judgment at a time when there was no legal term of the District Court. This assignment is sustained by the record; so upon the authority of Smith v. Chichester, 1 Cal., 409, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.