Case Name: State, ex rel. R. G. Cox, of Panama City, Charles E. Jensen, of Tampa, Charles W. Keyes, of Miami, W. F. Foster, of Fort Myers, E. F. Poulnot, of Tampa, Lee Hankins, of Miami, F. S. Porter, of Jacksonville, B. T. Tiller, of Sanford, Will C. Shumaker, of Chipley, v. R. A. Gray, Secretary of State
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1936-10-13
Citations: 125 Fla. 451
Docket Number: 
Parties: State, ex rel. R. G. Cox, of Panama City, Charles E. Jensen, of Tampa, Charles W. Keyes, of Miami, W. F. Foster, of Fort Myers, E. F. Poulnot, of Tampa, Lee Hankins, of Miami, F. S. Porter, of Jacksonville, B. T. Tiller, of Sanford, Will C. Shumaker, of Chipley, v. R. A. Gray, Secretary of State.
Judges: Whitfield, C. J., and Ellis, Terrell, Brown, Buford- and Davis, J. J., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 125
Pages: 451–451

Head Matter:
State, ex rel. R. G. Cox, of Panama City, Charles E. Jensen, of Tampa, Charles W. Keyes, of Miami, W. F. Foster, of Fort Myers, E. F. Poulnot, of Tampa, Lee Hankins, of Miami, F. S. Porter, of Jacksonville, B. T. Tiller, of Sanford, Will C. Shumaker, of Chipley, v. R. A. Gray, Secretary of State.
170 So. 139.
En Banc.
Opinion Filed October 13, 1936.
Rehearing Denied October 22, 1936.
Edwin L. Bryan, for Relators;
Cary D. Landis, Attorney General, and H. E. Carter and John L. Graham, Assistant Attorneys General, for Respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
— The questions involved in this proceeding have been found to be identical with those appearing in the mandamus proceeding entitled State, ex rel. Jackson, et al., v. Gray, this day decided. Therefore this matter is decided upon authority thereof, and it is the judgment and order of the Court that the motion to discharge the rule nisi and the demurrer to same are hereby sustained and the alternative writ denied.
Whitfield, C. J., and Ellis, Terrell, Brown, Buford- and Davis, J. J., concur.