Case Name: In re: Anthony TOWNSEND, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-11-28
Citations: 490 F. App'x 587
Docket Number: No. 12-1825
Parties: In re: Anthony TOWNSEND, Petitioner.
Judges: Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 490
Pages: 587–588

Head Matter:
In re: Anthony TOWNSEND, Petitioner.
No. 12-1825.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 21, 2012.
Decided: Nov. 28, 2012.
Anthony Townsend, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Townsend petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.