Case Name: Roger Dale HELMS, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. STINSON MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1994-12-27
Citations: 892 S.W.2d 757
Docket Number: No. 65600
Parties: Roger Dale HELMS, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. STINSON MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before SMITH, P.J., and CRANDALL and WHITE, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 892
Pages: 757–758

Head Matter:
Roger Dale HELMS, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. STINSON MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Defendant/Respondent.
No. 65600.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Dec. 27, 1994.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 31, 1995.
Application to Transfer Denied March 21, 1995.
Kenneth A. Leeds, Law Offices of Roskin & Leeds, Clayton, for appellant.
Louis J. Basso, Rabbitt, Pitzer & Snod-grass, P.C., St. Louis, for respondent.
Before SMITH, P.J., and CRANDALL and WHITE, JJ.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment based on a jury verdict in favor of defendant in a products liability case. He raises three points on appeal, all dealing with evidentiary rulings. The evidence to support the verdict was not insufficient. No error of law appears. The claims of evidentiary error were waived and/or not properly preserved for review and/or without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).