Case Name: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Alejandro MENDIOLA, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1986-08-28
Citations: 492 So. 2d 1074
Docket Number: No. 68172
Parties: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Alejandro MENDIOLA, Respondent.
Judges: McDonald, C.J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW and BARRETT, JJ., concur. .
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 492
Pages: 1074–1075

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Alejandro MENDIOLA, Respondent.
No. 68172.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Aug. 28, 1986.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Randi Klay-man Lazarus, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, for petitioner.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and N. Joseph Durant, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We review Mendiola v. State, 490 So.2d 75 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), to answer a certified question of great public importance. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.
We previously answered the certified question affirmatively in State v. Cross, 487 So.2d 1056 (Fla.1986). We approve the decision below.
It is so ordered.
McDonald, C.J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW and BARRETT, JJ., concur. .
Mendiola, at 76:
Under the 1983 Amendments to Article I, Section 12 of the Florida Constitution, does the exclusionary rule apply in probation revocation hearings?