Case Name: Richard S. Martorello, Respondent, v. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1999-04-29
Citations: 260 A.D.2d 317
Docket Number: 
Parties: Richard S. Martorello, Respondent, v Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 260
Pages: 317–318

Head Matter:
Richard S. Martorello, Respondent, v Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Appellant.
[689 NYS2d 82]

Opinion:
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lorraine Miller, J.), entered October 16, 1998, which denied defendant's motion for leave to make a motion for summary judgment more than 120 days after the filing of a note of issue, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The motion was properly denied absent an explanation why it was not made at the time that defendant moved to vacate the note of issue on the ground that plaintiff had failed to comply with all outstanding disclosure demands. Moreover, there is no showing that plaintiffs dilatory conduct in providing disclosure prevented defendant from moving for summary judgment. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Tom, Lerner, Mazzarelli and Friedman, JJ.