Case Name: CROTHERS v. SOPER et al. In re STEELE
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1926-01-12
Citations: 10 F.2d 793
Docket Number: No. 2421
Parties: CROTHERS v. SOPER et al. In re STEELE.
Judges: Before WADDILL and PARKER, Circuit Judges, and WATKINS, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 10
Pages: 793–793

Head Matter:
CROTHERS v. SOPER et al. In re STEELE.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
January 12, 1926.)
No. 2421.
Isaac L. Straus, of Baltimore, Md., for appellant.
William J. Bratton and Albert D. Mae-key, both of Elkton, Md. (Clarence K. Bowie and Bowie & Clark, all of Baltimore, Md., on the brief), for appellees.
Before WADDILL and PARKER, Circuit Judges, and WATKINS, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Having regard to the peculiar facts and circumstances of this ease, the relations existing between the mortgagor and the mortgagee, especially that the contested mortgage for $5,225, assuming the same to have been given originally for a valid consideration and effective as between the parties, was by understanding, if not by agreement, withheld from the record, so as not to affect the mortgagor's credit, the conclusion of the court is that the action of the District Judge and the referee, expunging and disallowing the said claim from the list of those upon the trustee's record, should be approved and affirmed. We are led to this view, moreover, by the fact that the case seems to be ruled by those of National Bank of Athens v. Shackelford, 36 S. Ct. 17, 239 U. S. 81, 60 L. Ed. 158 (in the Circuit Court of Appeals, 208 F. 677, 678, 125 C. C. A. 575); In re Lamie Chemical Co. (C. C. A.) 296 F. 24, 28; Millikin v. Second National Bank, 206 F. 14, 19, 124 C. C. A. 148 (both decisions of this court).
Affirmed.