Case Name: Willie NUTALL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-07-05
Citations: 194 S.W.3d 925
Docket Number: No. ED 85839
Parties: Willie NUTALL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J. and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J. and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 194
Pages: 925–925

Head Matter:
Willie NUTALL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 85839.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
July 5, 2006.
Jo Ann Rotermund, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Deborah Daniels, Roger Johnson, Co-Counsel, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J. and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J. and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Willie Nutall, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that during his plea hearing the court failed to comply with Rule 24.02.
The motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).