Case Name: Brigitte Rodriguez et al., Respondents, v. New York City Transit Authority, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2001-09-10
Citations: 286 A.D.2d 680
Docket Number: 
Parties: Brigitte Rodriguez et al., Respondents, v New York City Transit Authority, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 286
Pages: 680–681

Head Matter:
Brigitte Rodriguez et al., Respondents, v New York City Transit Authority, Appellant.
[729 NYS2d 909]

Opinion:
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defen dant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Carson, J.), dated January 13, 2000, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
In support of its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, the defendant failed to demonstrate prima facie its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see, Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320; Andre v Pomeroy, 35 NY2d 361). Thus, the defendant's motion for summary judgment was properly denied. O'Brien, J. P., Ritter, Altman and Schmidt, JJ., concur.