Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymundo GUTIERREZ-PADILLA, a.k.a. Raymond Padilla; et al., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-01-10
Citations: 263 F. App'x 598
Docket Number: No. 05-10784
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymundo GUTIERREZ-PADILLA, a.k.a. Raymond Padilla; et al., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 263
Pages: 598–599

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymundo GUTIERREZ-PADILLA, a.k.a. Raymond Padilla; et al., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-10784.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 7, 2008.
Filed Jan. 10, 2008.
Hartley M.K. West, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Hilary A. Fox, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Oakland, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, SILVERMAN and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
A review of the record and the opening brief indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, respondent's unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.