Case Name: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Repoleon PORCHIA, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1998-08-20
Citations: 716 So. 2d 766
Docket Number: No. 92657
Parties: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Repoleon PORCHIA, Respondent.
Judges: HARDING, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN, WELLS, ANSTEAD and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 716
Pages: 766–767

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Repoleon PORCHIA, Respondent.
No. 92657.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Aug. 20, 1998.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Maximillian J. Changus, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Petitioner.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Dee Ball, Assistant Public Defender, Seventh Judicial Circuit, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have for review the following question certified to be of great public importance:
SHOULD THE REQUIREMENT THAT A DEFENDANT PAY FOR DRUG TESTING BE TREATED AS A GENERAL CONDITION OF PROBATION FOR WHICH NOTICE IS PROVIDED BY SECTION 948.09(6), FLORIDA STATUTES (1995), OR SHOULD IT BE TREATED AS A SPECIAL CONDITION THAT REQUIRES ORAL ANNOUNCEMENT?
Porchia v. State, 705 So.2d 1050, 1051 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.
We answered this question in State v. Williams, 712 So.2d 762 (Fla.1998), by holding that the requirement that a defendant pay for drug testing is a special condition of probation which the trial court must pronounce orally at sentencing.
Accordingly, we approve the decision below.
It is so ordered.
HARDING, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN, WELLS, ANSTEAD and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.