Case Name: Diondrey HARDWICT Defendant/Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-11-24
Citations: 987 S.W.2d 339
Docket Number: No. 73370
Parties: Diondrey HARDWICT Defendant/Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, J. and RHODES RUSSELL, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 987
Pages: 339–339

Head Matter:
Diondrey HARDWICT Defendant/Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 73370.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Nov. 24, 1998.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Feb. 22, 1999.
Application to Transfer Denied April 27, 1999.
Dave Hemingway, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Kevin F. Hennessey, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, J. and RHODES RUSSELL, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant appeals from the judgment, denying without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.
The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).