Case Name: DUNN v. VIRGINIA FIRE INS. CO.; MORONEY v. EASTERN INS. CO. SAME v. HARTFORD INS. CO.; DUNN v. ORIENT INS. CO.; MORONEY v. SPRINGFIELD FIRE & MARINE INS. CO.; SAME v. ORIENT INS. CO.; SAME v. LONDON ASSUR. CORP.; SAME v. VIRGINIA MARINE & FIRE INS. CO.; DUNN v. HARTFORD INS. CO.; MORONEY v. GEORGIA HOME INS. CO.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1901-04-09
Citations: 106 F. 986
Docket Number: Nos. 991-993; 995-999, 1011, 1012
Parties: DUNN v. VIRGINIA FIRE INS. CO.
Judges: Before PARDEE, McGORMICK, and SHELBY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter
Volume: 106
Pages: 986–986

Head Matter:
DUNN v. VIRGINIA FIRE INS. CO.
MORONEY v. EASTERN INS. CO. SAME v. HARTFORD INS. CO. DUNN v. ORIENT INS. CO. MORONEY v. SPRINGFIELD FIRE & MARINE INS. CO. SAME v. ORIENT INS. CO. SAME v. LONDON ASSUR. CORP. SAME v. VIRGINIA MARINE & FIRE INS. CO. DUNN v. HARTFORD INS. CO. MORONEY v. GEORGIA HOME INS. CO.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 9, 1901.).
Nos. 991-993; 995-999, 1011, 1012.
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana. E.. A.
O’Sullivan, for plaintiffs in error.
J. Ward Gurley, D. C. Mellen, Chas. P. Fenner, and W. W. Howe, for defendants in error.
Before PARDEE, McGORMICK, and SHELBY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
All the facts in the above-entitled eases are the same as those presented in the case of Dunn v. Insurance Co. (No. 990 of the docket of this court) 105 Fed. 1002, in which case the judgment of the lower court was affirmed. Following that case, the judgments herein are affirmed.