Case Name: L. A. HORSTED, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Adult Corrections, State of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1970-09-11
Citations: 239 So. 2d 153
Docket Number: No. 70-214
Parties: L. A. HORSTED, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Adult Corrections, State of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: HOBSON, C. J., and McNULTY, J., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 239
Pages: 153–153

Head Matter:
L. A. HORSTED, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Adult Corrections, State of Florida, Respondent.
No. 70-214.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Sept. 11, 1970.
L. A. Horsted, in pro. per.
Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Morton J. Hanlon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for respondent.

Opinion:
MANN, Judge.
Horsted seeks appellate review of the sufficiency of evidence underlying his conviction. He claims that his appointed counsel failed to file a motion for a new trial and that he was deprived of due process because insufficiency is not arguable on appeal unless the motion has been timely made for a new trial. State v. Wright, Fla.1969, 224 So.2d 300. But he does not allege that the evidence is even arguably insufficient.
We are confronted with the problem of extending or confining the doctrine of Baggett v. Wainwright, Fla.1969, 229 So.2d 239. We do not think Baggett requires us to grant relief here.
Petition denied.
HOBSON, C. J., and McNULTY, J., concur.