Case Name: Asiyeh De CARTERET, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Larry G. MASSANARI, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-08-28
Citations: 17 F. App'x 665
Docket Number: No. 00-16961; D.C. No. CV-99-6024-SMS
Parties: Asiyeh De CARTERET, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Larry G. MASSANARI, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 17
Pages: 665–665

Head Matter:
Asiyeh De CARTERET, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Larry G. MASSANARI, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 00-16961.
D.C. No. CV-99-6024-SMS.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 13, 2001 .
Decided Aug. 28, 2001.
Before HAWKINS, TASHIMA, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
Lariy G. Massanari is substituted for his predecessor as Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Asiyeh De Carteret appeals the district court's summary judgment affirming the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration's denial of her son's application for Supplemental Security Income disability benefits. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court's decision, and we review for substantial evidence and legal error the Administrative Law Judge's ("ALJ") decision. Tackett v. Apfel, 180 F.3d 1094, 1097 (9th Cir.1999). We affirm.
We conclude that the district court did not err because substantial evidence supports the ALJ's finding that De Carteret is not disabled under 42 U.S.C. § 1382c(a)(3). See Tackett, 180 F.3d at 1098.
De Carteret's remaining contentions lack merit.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.