Case Name: In the Interest of I.A.L., and In the Interest of I.M.L.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-05-04
Citations: 138 S.W.3d 749
Docket Number: No. ED 83523
Parties: In the Interest of I.A.L., and In the Interest of I.M.L.
Judges: Before BOOKER T. SHAW, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 138
Pages: 749–749

Head Matter:
In the Interest of I.A.L., and In the Interest of I.M.L.
No. ED 83523.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
May 4, 2004.
Rehearing Denied July 8, 2004.
Stephen R. Southard, Cape Girardeau, MO, for appellant.
Matthew J. Koetting, Cape Girardeau, MO, for respondent.
Before BOOKER T. SHAW, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Deanna Lopez ("Mother") appeals the judgment terminating her parental rights of I.A.L. and I.M.L. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would be of no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).