Case Name: STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George A. CORTEZ, a/k/a George Robert Cortez, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Jurisdiction: New Mexico
Decision Date: 1983-05-24
Citations: 100 N.M. 666
Docket Number: No. 5587
Parties: STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George A. CORTEZ, a/k/a George Robert Cortez, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: WOOD and LOPEZ, JJ., concur.
Reporter: New Mexico Reports
Volume: 100
Pages: 666–667

Head Matter:
674 P.2d 1126
STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George A. CORTEZ, a/k/a George Robert Cortez, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 5587.
Court of Appeals of New Mexico.
May 24, 1983.
Certiorari Denied July 22, 1983.
Paul Bardacke, Atty. Gen., William Lazar, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for plaintiff-appellee.
Winston Roberts-Hohl, Singleton & Roberts-Hohl, Santa Fe, Driggers & Driggers, Las Cruces, for defendant-appellant.

Opinion:
OPINION ON REMAND
WALTERS, Chief Judge.
The Supreme Court granted certiorari in this case, and on February 3, 1983, 100 N.M. 158, 667 P.2d 963, reversed the majority opinion and adopted the opinion of Judge Wood as the opinion of the Supreme Court. The file was returned to this court on May 17, 1983. Among the matters discussed by Judge Wood was his satisfaction that the evidence was sufficient to show an intent to distribute cocaine. On remand we are directed to address that issue.
The Supreme Court having adopted Judge Wood's opinion, we are constrained to and do hold that the evidence was sufficient to support defendant's conviction on that charge.
The judgment and sentence on all counts is affirmed. IT IS SO ORDERED.
WOOD and LOPEZ, JJ., concur.