Case Name: Ozo Obadiah NWABUOKU, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-08-23
Citations: 195 F. App'x 162
Docket Number: No. 06-1262
Parties: Ozo Obadiah NWABUOKU, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 195
Pages: 162–162

Head Matter:
Ozo Obadiah NWABUOKU, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 06-1262.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 9, 2006.
Decided: Aug. 23, 2006.
Ozo Obadiah Nwabuoku, Petitioner Pro Se. Daniel Eric Goldman, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Ozo Obadiah Nwabuoku, a native and citizen of Nigeria, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("Board") denying his motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board's order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Nwabuoku's motion to reopen as untimely. See 8 U.S.C.A. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(i) (West 2005 & Supp. 2006); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2006). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Nwabuoku, No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ] (B.I.A. Feb. 14, 2006). We also deny Nwabuoku's pending motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.