Case Name: Sharp and Tuttle against Young and Young
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1820-05
Citations: 5 N.J.L. 845
Docket Number: 
Parties: Sharp and Tuttle against Young and Young.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 5
Pages: 976–976

Head Matter:
Sharp and Tuttle against Young and Young.
Affidavit is judgment,' and'obligations, but in no- other cases
VANARSDALE moved for leave to enter judgment a warrant of attorney, unaccompanied by bond, and without affidavit: the statute requiring the affidavit UP0U all confessions of judgment, having been repealed ; and the affidavit being now required only in cases of . , , , , , , ,. .. ,, judgments upon bonds and obligations; other cases being left, as they were, before the passage of the statute, requiring the affidavit. See statute, 24th February 1820.
See Acts of 1829—92. Parker vs. Griggs, 1 South. 163. Cliver vs. Applegate, ante 479. Woodward ads. Cook, 1 Hal. 160. Burroughs vs. Condit, 1 Hal. 300. Latham vs. Lawrence, 6 Hal. 322. Evans vs. Adams, 3 Gr. 373. Melville vs. Brown, 1 Har. 363. Reading vs. Reading, 4 Zab. 358. Dean vs. Thatcher, 3 Vr. 470.

Opinion:
Court.
Let the judgment be entered, upon the warrant of attorney, without affidavit.