Case Name: Bernard Cahill, Respondent, v. The City of Rochester, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1906-01-30
Citations: 183 N.Y. 581
Docket Number: 
Parties: Bernard Cahill, Respondent, v. The City of Rochester, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 183
Pages: 581–582

Head Matter:
Bernard Cahill, Respondent, v. The City of Rochester, Appellant.
(Argued January 15, 1906;
decided January 30, 1906.)
Cahill v. City of Rochester, 96 App. Div. 557, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered July 14, 1904, affirming a judgment iii favor 'of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
William W. Webb, Corporation Counsel (John M. Stull of counsel), for appellant.
Henry R. Glynn and Harvey F. Remington for respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion;
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., O'Brien, Haight, Yann, Werner and Willard Bartlett, JJ; Not sitting : Hiscock, J.