Case Name: Joseph W. GOODWIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2005-04-29
Citations: 899 So. 2d 1282
Docket Number: No. 5D04-1929
Parties: Joseph W. GOODWIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: PETERSON, ORFINGER and MONACO, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 899
Pages: 1282–1282

Head Matter:
Joseph W. GOODWIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D04-1929.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
April 29, 2005.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Michael S. Becker, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Joseph W. Goodwin, Raiford, Pro Se.
No Appearance for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this Anders appeal, a review of the record shows no apparent reversible error. See State v. Causey, 503 So.2d 321 (Fla. 1987). Joseph W. Goodwin entered a no contest plea, and the sentence conforms to the plea bargain or is otherwise legal. Although Goodwin alleges in his pro se brief that he did not understand the sentence that would be imposed, he did not file a motion to withdraw his plea in the trial court. As a result, the issue is not preserved for appellate review and must be raised in a timely motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Accordingly, we affirm Goodwin's conviction and sentence without prejudice to file a timely rule 3.850 motion.
AFFIRMED.
PETERSON, ORFINGER and MONACO, JJ., concur.
. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).