Case Name: Marie Duffy, as Guardian ad Litem of Ethel Duffy, et al., Appellants, v. Luther Banks et al., Respondents; Luther Banks, Plaintiff, v. Star Bus Lines, Inc., et al., Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1962-01-15
Citations: 15 A.D.2d 663
Docket Number: 
Parties: Marie Duffy, as Guardian ad Litem of Ethel Duffy, et al., Appellants, v. Luther Banks et al., Respondents. Luther Banks, Plaintiff, v. Star Bus Lines, Inc., et al., Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 15
Pages: 663–664

Head Matter:
Marie Duffy, as Guardian ad Litem of Ethel Duffy, et al., Appellants, v. Luther Banks et al., Respondents. Luther Banks, Plaintiff, v. Star Bus Lines, Inc., et al., Defendants.

Opinion:
In our opinion, under all the circumstances, the exercise of a sound discretion and the interests of justice require that plaintiffs be allowed to serve the proposed supplemental complaint and bill of particulars upon the conditions stated (cf. Poplar v. Bourjois, Inc., 298 N. Y. 62, 67; Wagner v. Mittendorf, 232 N. Y. 481; Matter of Dickerson v. Essex County, 2 A D 2d 516, 519-520; Brewster v. Brewster Co., 138 App. Div. 139, 140). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.