Case Name: Harold BERGER, Claimant-Respondent, v. CHRYSLER MOTORS CORPORATION, Employer-Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1994-01-11
Citations: 867 S.W.2d 720
Docket Number: No. 64059
Parties: Harold BERGER, Claimant-Respondent, v. CHRYSLER MOTORS CORPORATION, Employer-Appellant.
Judges: Before SIMON, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and KAROHL, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 867
Pages: 720–721

Head Matter:
Harold BERGER, Claimant-Respondent, v. CHRYSLER MOTORS CORPORATION, Employer-Appellant.
No. 64059.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Jan. 11, 1994.
Evans & Dixon, George T. Floras, St. Louis, for employer-appellant.
Susan K. Roach, St. Louis, for claimant-respondent.
Before SIMON, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and KAROHL, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant appeals from an adverse award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. It also filed a motion to remand for the taking of additional evidence with this court. Motion denied. The findings and conclusions of the Labor and Industrial Commission are not erroneous. An extended opinion would not have precedential value. Award affirmed in accordance with rule 84.-16(b).