Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael CROMWELL, a/k/a Mike Tyson, a/k/a Mikey, a/k/a Charlie, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-08-23
Citations: 668 F. App'x 66
Docket Number: No. 16-6599
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael CROMWELL, a/k/a Mike Tyson, a/k/a Mikey, a/k/a Charlie, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 668
Pages: 66–66

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael CROMWELL, a/k/a Mike Tyson, a/k/a Mikey, a/k/a Charlie, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-6599
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: August 18, 2016
Decided: August 23, 2016
Michael Cromwell, Appellant Pro Se, Joseph Evan DePadilla, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Ap-pellee.
Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael Cromwell appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Cromwell, No. 2:11-cr-00009-AWA-DEM-1 (E.D. Va. Oct. 21, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legál contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED