Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Paul Lynn SCHLIEVE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-02-15
Citations: 712 F. App'x 434
Docket Number: No. 14-40577
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Paul Lynn SCHLIEVE, Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 712
Pages: 434–435

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Paul Lynn SCHLIEVE, Defendant-Appellant
No. 14-40577
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed February 15, 2018
Alan Reeve Jackson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Texas, Tyler, TX, Maureen Clancy Smith, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Texas, Sherman, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
William Jones, Jones Law Firm, Madison, WI, for Defendant-Appellant
Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the certain reasons set forth in the magistrate judge's report of August 24, 2010.
The conviction of Schlieve was affirmed by this court in 2005, and then he filed a motion under § 2255 to vacate his sen tence. The only point still pursued claims that defense counsel was misled by the prosecutor about evidence on a video that would have been Brady material and could have been suppressed had not counsel been misled. The record fully obliterates that claim, because the defense counsel had possession of the video, as did the jury. No evidence stands to support it.
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.