Case Name: Travis WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-02-13
Citations: 810 So. 2d 985
Docket Number: No. 4D01-3353
Parties: Travis WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: POLEN, C.J., STONE and KLEIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 810
Pages: 985–985

Head Matter:
Travis WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D01-3353.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb. 13, 2002.
Rehearing Denied April 4, 2002.
Travis Williams, Miami, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the denial of appellant's rule 3.850 motion and certify as a question of great public importance the same question certified in Stretcher v. State, 803 So.2d 813 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001):
WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?
POLEN, C.J., STONE and KLEIN, JJ., concur.