Case Name: Ronald YEAGER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-12-28
Citations: 13 S.W.3d 655
Docket Number: No. ED 76005
Parties: Ronald YEAGER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 13
Pages: 655–656

Head Matter:
Ronald YEAGER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 76005.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Dec. 28, 1999.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 2, 2000.
Elaine A. Pudlowski, Special Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Susan K. Glass, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Ronald Yeager, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties and find the motion court's judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).