Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rodolpho Valerio BAILEY, a/k/a J. Paul Rudy, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-08-22
Citations: 43 F. App'x 661
Docket Number: No. 02-4241
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rodolpho Valerio BAILEY, a/k/a J. Paul Rudy, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 43
Pages: 661–662

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rodolpho Valerio BAILEY, a/k/a J. Paul Rudy, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-4241.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 13, 2002.
Decided Aug. 22, 2002.
Scott A. Shough, Fairmont, West Virginia, for Appellant. Thomas E. Johnston, United States Attorney, John C. Parr, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WIDENER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Rodolpho Valerio Bailey appeals the sixty-six month sentence imposed by the district court following his guilty plea to a single count of distribution of cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B) (2000). Our review of the record discloses that Bailey knowingly and voluntarily waived his statutory right to appeal by the terms of his plea agreement. See United States v. Marin, 961 F.2d 493, 496 (4th Cir.1992). This waiver precludes our review of his claim that the district court misapplied the sentencing guidelines. See United States v. Brown, 232 F.3d 399, 402-03 (4th Cir.2000). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.