Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Guadalupe HERNANDEZ-LA CRUZ, also known as Guadalupe Hernandez-De La Cruz, also known as Jose Guadalupe Hernandez-De La Cruz, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-08-06
Citations: 611 F. App'x 238
Docket Number: No. 14-40484
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Guadalupe HERNANDEZ-LA CRUZ, also known as Guadalupe Hernandez-De La Cruz, also known as Jose Guadalupe Hernandez-De La Cruz, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 611
Pages: 238–239

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Guadalupe HERNANDEZ-LA CRUZ, also known as Guadalupe Hernandez-De La Cruz, also known as Jose Guadalupe Hernandez-De La Cruz, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 14-40484
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 6, 2015.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Gabriel Marc Cervantes, Esq., Law Office of Marc Cervantes, P.L.L.C:, Corpus Christi, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Guadalupe Hernandez-La Cruz, Ray-mondville, TX, pro se.
Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Guadalupe Hernandez-La Cruz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Hernandez-La Cruz has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.