Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Duvall HUCKS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-09-14
Citations: 668 F. App'x 515
Docket Number: No. 16-6289
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Duvall HUCKS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 668
Pages: 515–516

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Duvall HUCKS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-6289
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: September 7, 2016
Decided: September 14, 2016
Duvall Hucks, Appellant Pro Se. Debra Lynn Dwyer, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Duvall Hucks appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hucks, No. 8:95-cr-00267-AW-7 (D. Md. Feb. 2, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be fore this court.and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED