Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Barry Lewis MATTHEWS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-02-15
Citations: 3 F. App'x 136
Docket Number: No. 00-7777
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Barry Lewis MATTHEWS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 3
Pages: 136–136

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Barry Lewis MATTHEWS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 00-7777.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 8, 2001.
Decided Feb. 15, 2001.
Barry Lewis Matthews, pro se.
Donald Ray Wolthuis, Office of the United States Attorney, Roanoke, VA, for appellee.
Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Barry Lewis Matthews seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion challenging the district court's prior denial of his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error in its determination that Matthews' motion for reconsideration was untimely under Rule 60(b). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Matthews, No. CA-96-1007-07 (W.D.Va. Nov. 21, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.