Case Name: Abraham Lauterstein and Harry Shachter, Appellants, v. The Dime Savings Bank of Brooklyn, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1926-05
Citations: 216 A.D. 848
Docket Number: 
Parties: Abraham Lauterstein and Harry Shachter, Appellants, v. The Dime Savings Bank of Brooklyn, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 216
Pages: 848–848

Head Matter:
Abraham Lauterstein and Harry Shachter, Appellants, v. The Dime Savings Bank of Brooklyn, Respondent.

Opinion:
Order denying plaintiffs' motion for an injunction pendente lite reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. We think the Municipal Court is without jurisdiction to entertain thq summary proceeding complained of, and that, therefore, the defendant should be enjoined from prosecuting it. Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Manning, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.