Case Name: Delbert W. HARRISON v. STATE of Arkansas
Court: Arkansas Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Arkansas
Decision Date: 1989-11-20
Citations: 300 Ark. 439
Docket Number: CR 89-150
Parties: Delbert W. HARRISON v. STATE of Arkansas
Judges: Purtle, J., concurs.
Reporter: Arkansas Reports
Volume: 300
Pages: 439–441

Head Matter:
Delbert W. HARRISON v. STATE of Arkansas
CR 89-150
779 S.W.2d 536
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Opinion delivered November 20, 1989
Appellant, pro se.
Steve Clark, Att’y Gen., by: /. Brent Standridge, Asst. Att’y Gen., for appellee.

Opinion:
Robert H. Dudley, Justice.
The appellant, Delbert Harrison, was convicted of burglary and theft of property. We affirmed. Harrison v. State, 287 Ark. 102, 696 S.W.2d 501 (1985). He then filed a petition in this court asking that he be allowed to proceed in circuit court with post-conviction proceedings pursuant to A.R.Cr.P. Rule 37. We denied the petition in an unpublished opinion. Petitioner then filed this action in circuit court to correct an illegal sentence. Ark. Code Ann.§ 16-90-111 (1987). The trial court denied relief. We affirm.
Appellant's abstract consists only of a list, or inventory, of the pleadings and judgment. It is flagrantly deficient. When an abstract is flagrantly deficient the judgment must be affirmed for failure to comply with Rule 9(e)(2) of the Rules of the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals. Grisso v. State, 297 Ark. 546, 763 S.W.2d 661 (1989). Accordingly, we affirm.
Purtle, J., concurs.