Case Name: Matthew PRINCE, Respondent, v. Col. Ronald K. REPLOGLE, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2014-07-29
Citations: 437 S.W.3d 393
Docket Number: No. ED 100226
Parties: Matthew PRINCE, Respondent, v. Col. Ronald K. REPLOGLE, Appellant.
Judges: Before ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., J., and NANCY M. WATKINS, S.J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 437
Pages: 393–393

Head Matter:
Matthew PRINCE, Respondent, v. Col. Ronald K. REPLOGLE, Appellant.
No. ED 100226.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
July 29, 2014.
Chris Koster, Jaclyn A. Kinkade, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Curtis O..-Poore, John C. Steffens, Cape Girardeau, MO, for respondent.
Before ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., J., and NANCY M. WATKINS, S.J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant Col. Ronald K. Replogle, Superintendent of the Missouri State Highway Patrol, appeals the trial court's summary judgment in favor of Respondent Matthew Prince. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2014).