Case Name: Carlton CLAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carl MANIS, Warden/Administrator; J.A. Harmon, Institutional Hearing Officer, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-10-24
Citations: 670 F. App'x 87
Docket Number: No. 16-6315
Parties: Carlton CLAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carl MANIS, Warden/Administrator; J.A. Harmon, Institutional Hearing Officer, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before SHEDD, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 670
Pages: 87–87

Head Matter:
Carlton CLAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carl MANIS, Warden/Administrator; J.A. Harmon, Institutional Hearing Officer, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-6315
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: October 19, 2016
Decided: October 24, 2016
Carlton Clay, Appellant Pro Se.
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Carlton Clay appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C, § 1915A(b) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Clay v. Manis, No. 2:16-cv-00036-AWA-LRL (E.D. Va. Feb. 16, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED