Case Name: GRIGSBY & ASSOCIATES, INC., Calvin B. Grigsby, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. M SECURITIES INVESTMENT, Howard Gary & Company, Howard V. Gary, National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-09-04
Citations: 693 F.3d 1316
Docket Number: No. 09-11817
Parties: GRIGSBY & ASSOCIATES, INC., Calvin B. Grigsby, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. M SECURITIES INVESTMENT, Howard Gary & Company, Howard V. Gary, National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before PRYOR and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges, and EVANS, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 693
Pages: 1316–1317

Head Matter:
GRIGSBY & ASSOCIATES, INC., Calvin B. Grigsby, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. M SECURITIES INVESTMENT, Howard Gary & Company, Howard V. Gary, National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 09-11817.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Sept. 4, 2012.
Calvin B. Grigsby, Grigsby & Associates, San Francisco, CA, pro se.
Curtis Carlson, Carlson & Lewittes, P.A., Miami, FL, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before PRYOR and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges, and EVANS, District Judge.
Honorable Orinda Evans, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Georgia, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
ORDER:
This matter is before the Court on a Petition for Rehearing. The Court presently plans to enter, in the future, an order along this line:
"The motion for rehearing is DENIED, except our decision on the denial of an injunction of arbitration is totally withdrawn: that issue is moot given that the arbitration has been completed with the participation of the parties.
The order confirming the arbitration award is vacated and the case remanded for further proceedings. The award may be confirmed only if the district court determines de novo — anew, by itself, and for itself — that the Defendants did not waive the right to arbitrate by their pre-arbitration conduct, including their earlier filing several lawsuits against Plaintiffs."
The parties have 15 days from the date of this order to explain why the proposed order on rehearing should not be entered. The explanation from each party must not exceed 12 pages.