Case Name: Jose Luis OCHOA, Petitioner-Appellant v. WARDEN, REEVES COUNTY DETENTION CENTER III; United States Bureau of Prisons; Department of Homeland Security; Eric H. Holder, Jr., U.S. Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-04-12
Citations: 518 F. App'x 300
Docket Number: No. 10-50844
Parties: Jose Luis OCHOA, Petitioner-Appellant v. WARDEN, REEVES COUNTY DETENTION CENTER III; United States Bureau of Prisons; Department of Homeland Security; Eric H. Holder, Jr., U.S. Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: Before JONES, DENNIS, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 518
Pages: 300–300

Head Matter:
Jose Luis OCHOA, Petitioner-Appellant v. WARDEN, REEVES COUNTY DETENTION CENTER III; United States Bureau of Prisons; Department of Homeland Security; Eric H. Holder, Jr., U.S. Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 10-50844
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 12, 2013.
Jose Luis Ochoa, Pecos, TX, pro se.
Gary Layton Anderson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Respondents-Appellees.
Before JONES, DENNIS, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Jose Luis Ochoa, federal prisoner # 64218-179, an alien against whom the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement has issued a detainer subjecting him to immediate removal from the United States upon release from Bureau of Prisons (BOP) custody, appeals the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging the BOP's exclusion of him from rehabilitation programs and halfway houses. The petition is foreclosed by this court's decision in Gallegos-Hernandez v. United States, 688 F.3d 190, 192-93 (5th Cir.2012), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 133 S.Ct. 561, 184 L.Ed.2d 365 (2012).
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cm. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.