Case Name: Christopher Maddox MOSSBURG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The State of MARYLAND, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-02-17
Citations: 676 F. App'x 211
Docket Number: No. 16-1869
Parties: Christopher Maddox MOSSBURG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The State of MARYLAND, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 676
Pages: 211–212

Head Matter:
Christopher Maddox MOSSBURG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The State of MARYLAND, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 16-1869
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: January 4, 2017
Decided: February 17, 2017
Christopher Maddox Mossburg, Appellant Pro Se. Michele J. McDonald, Alexis Burrell Rohde, Assistant Attorneys General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before TRAXLER, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Maddox Mossburg appeals the district court's order dismissing his complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mossburg v. Maryland, No. 8:15-cv-01633-RWT, 2016 WL 3541237 (D. Md. June 29, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED