Case Name: Larry PEOPLES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-07-16
Citations: 86 S.W.3d 71
Docket Number: No. ED 79938
Parties: Larry PEOPLES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., and MARY K HOFF and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 86
Pages: 71–72

Head Matter:
Larry PEOPLES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 79938.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
July 16, 2002.
Raymund J. Capekmtch, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Evan J. Buchheim, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., and MARY K HOFF and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Larry Peoples, appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing. He contends his trial attorney coerced him into pleading guilty by failing to fully investigate his case.
Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).