Case Name: Mary G. JONES, Appellant, v. William R. JONES, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1983-05-20
Citations: 431 So. 2d 697
Docket Number: No. 82-1267
Parties: Mary G. JONES, Appellant, v. William R. JONES, Appellee.
Judges: OTT, C.J., and DANAHY and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 431
Pages: 697–697

Head Matter:
Mary G. JONES, Appellant, v. William R. JONES, Appellee.
No. 82-1267.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
May 20, 1983.
John M. Edman of Meros, Coit, Edman, Meros, Smith & Meros, St. Petersburg, for appellant.
William R. Jones, pro se.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The wife appeals several of the financial aspects and property distribution awards fashioned by the trial judge in the judgment which dissolved the brief marriage of the parties. We are required to review the judgment as a whole, and not the separate remedies used by the trial judge to achieve equity between the parties. Based on our review of the record we find that the trial judge did not abuse the broad discretion accorded trial judges by Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980). Therefore, we affirm.
OTT, C.J., and DANAHY and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.