Case Name: STATE v. ARTHUR CARPENTER
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 1927-05-04
Citations: 193 N.C. 848
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE v. ARTHUR CARPENTER.
Judges: 
Reporter: North Carolina Reports
Volume: 193
Pages: 848–848

Head Matter:
STATE v. ARTHUR CARPENTER.
(Filed 4 May, 1927.)
Appeal by defendant from Schenck, J., at October Term, 1926, of Gaston.
No error.
Attorney-General Brummitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.
B. B. Warren and George W. Wilson for defendant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The defendant's exceptions must be overruled. The fact that McGinnis may have been a notorious "blind tiger" could not have availed the defendant. . S. v. Lane, 166 N. C., 333. There was evidence that the defendant's admission was voluntary, and for this reason the third and fifth exceptions are untenable. The instruction as to the defendant's possession'of the liquor is sustained by S. v. McAllister, 187 N. C., 400. The other exceptions are without merit and require no discussion.
No error.