Case Name: Sabrina Bruno, Respondent, v. 3 West 35th Company, LLC, Defendant, and M&S 276 Corp., Doing Business as Café Au Bon Gout, Inc., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2011-10-25
Citations: 88 A.D.3d 612
Docket Number: 
Parties: Sabrina Bruno, Respondent, v 3 West 35th Company, LLC, Defendant, and M&S 276 Corp., Doing Business as Café Au Bon Gout, Inc., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 88
Pages: 612–613

Head Matter:
Sabrina Bruno, Respondent, v 3 West 35th Company, LLC, Defendant, and M&S 276 Corp., Doing Business as Café Au Bon Gout, Inc., Appellant.
[931 NYS2d 501]

Opinion:
The court acted within its discretion in granting plaintiff an extension of time to serve defendant, pursuant to CPLR 306-b, in the interest of justice (see Leader v Maroney, Ponzini & Spencer, 97 NY2d 95, 104-106 [2001]). Defendant received notice of the lawsuit and served an answer before the statute of limitations expired (cf. Slate v Schiavone Constr. Co., 4 NY3d 816 [2005]). Contrary to defendant's contention, under these cir cumstances, plaintiff was not required to show either diligent efforts or exigent circumstances (see Leader, 97 NY2d at 105).
We have considered defendant's remaining arguments and find them without merit. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Friedman, Catterson, Renwick and Richter, JJ.