Case Name: Mark James KONSAVICH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. MEEKS, Warden FCI Williamsburg, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-08-01
Citations: 694 F. App'x 168
Docket Number: No. 17-6485
Parties: Mark James KONSAVICH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. MEEKS, Warden FCI Williamsburg, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 694
Pages: 168–168

Head Matter:
Mark James KONSAVICH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. MEEKS, Warden FCI Williamsburg, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 17-6485
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 27, 2017
Decided: August 1, 2017
Mark James Konsavich, Appellant Pro Se.
Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Mark James Konsavich appeals the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's report and recommendation and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Konsavich leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Konsavich v. Meeks, No. 1:16-cv-01829-RBH, 2017 WL 885353 (D.S.C. Mar. 3, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED