Case Name: DIRECT TRANSPORT COMPANY OF FLORIDA, INC., a corporation, Direct Equipment Company of Florida, a corporation, Fleet Transport Company of Florida, a corporation, Fleet Management Company, a corporation, Clayton L. Wolfe and David Harden Cochran, Petitioners, v. Clayton RAKASKAS, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1965-06-02
Citations: 176 So. 2d 68
Docket Number: No. 33808
Parties: DIRECT TRANSPORT COMPANY OF FLORIDA, INC., a corporation, Direct Equipment Company of Florida, a corporation, Fleet Transport Company of Florida, a corporation, Fleet Management Company, a corporation, Clayton L. Wolfe and David Harden Cochran, Petitioners, v. Clayton RAKASKAS, Respondent.
Judges: DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 176
Pages: 68–68

Head Matter:
DIRECT TRANSPORT COMPANY OF FLORIDA, INC., a corporation, Direct Equipment Company of Florida, a corporation, Fleet Transport Company of Florida, a corporation, Fleet Management Company, a corporation, Clayton L. Wolfe and David Harden Cochran, Petitioners, v. Clayton RAKASKAS, Respondent.
No. 33808.
Supreme Court of Florida.
June 2, 1965.
Rehearing Denied July 1, 1965.
Ross, Reinhardt & Goodman and Richard M. Gale, Miami, for petitioners.
Dean, Adams & Fischer and Jeanne Hey-ward, Miami, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Because of an apparent jurisdictional conflict of decisions we issued a writ of certiorari, and have heard arguments on jurisdiction and merits.
Upon further careful study of the briefs and record we have concluded that the decision of the District Court does not collide with prior decisions of the Court or other District Courts on the points of law decided.
We find, therefore, that the writ was improvidently issued and it is hereby discharged.
It is so ordered.
DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and O'CONNELL, JJ., concur.