Case Name: Jerome MULLINS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2011-08-17
Citations: 66 So. 3d 1091
Docket Number: No. 3D10-2475
Parties: Jerome MULLINS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SHEPHERD and SUAREZ, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 66
Pages: 1091–1091

Head Matter:
Jerome MULLINS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D10-2475.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Aug. 17, 2011.
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, and Stephen J. Weinbaum, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Michael W. Mervine, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SHEPHERD and SUAREZ, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Hill v. State, 549 So.2d 179, 182 (Fla.1989) (failure to present constitutional argument grounded on due process to trial court procedurally bars appellant from presenting argument on appeal); State v. Fernandez, 546 So.2d 791 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989) (approving a "cash for weight" agreement in which the amount of the confidential informant's fee was based upon the amount of drugs involved.)