Case Name: David Earl WATTLETON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-08-28
Citations: 696 F. App'x 652
Docket Number: No. 17-6329
Parties: David Earl WATTLETON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 696
Pages: 652–653

Head Matter:
David Earl WATTLETON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 17-6329
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: August 24, 2017
Decided: August 28, 2017
David Wattleton, Appellant Pro Se.
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
David Wattleton appeals the district court's order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed,2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wat-tleton v. Lynch, No. 6:16-ct-03063-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 28, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. ,
AFFIRMED