Case Name: Claude Wyant v. Emma Russell
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1923-12-26
Citations: 2 Ohio Law Abs. 6
Docket Number: No. 17841
Parties: Claude Wyant v. Emma Russell.
Judges: Marshall, C. J., Wanamaker, Jones, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ., concur.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 2
Pages: 6–6

Head Matter:
No. 3
WYANT v. RUSSELL
No. 17841
Claude Wyant v. Emma Russell.
Error to Lucas Court of Appeals. See p. 4.
841 — NEW TRIAL — Postponement of statutory date from which time for error proceeding begins to run, not affected by a new post dated order overruling motion for new trial
—Abuse of discretion not presumed, but must appear from record.

Opinion:
ROBINSON, J.
1. Abuse of discretion will not be presumed but must appear from the record.
2. The granting of a motion, after judgment, to vacate a former order of the court overruling a motion for a new trial, and an entry of a new order overruling the motion for a new trial, are not effective to postpone the date from' which the statute limiting the time within which a proceeding in error may be commenced begins to run, where the judgmént upon the verdict antedates such entry and has not been vacated.
Judgment affirmed.
Marshall, C. J., Wanamaker, Jones, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ., concur.