Case Name: MATTOX et al. v. CONDO
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 2003-06-05
Citations: 261 Ga. App. 519
Docket Number: A03A0734
Parties: MATTOX et al. v. CONDO.
Judges: Ellington, J., concurs. Blackburn, P. J., concurs specially and concurs in the judgment only.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 261
Pages: 519–521

Head Matter:
A03A0734.
MATTOX et al. v. CONDO.
(583 SE2d 193)

Opinion:
Phipps, Judge.
While driving a truck for his employer, D H Supply Company, Carlos Mattox ran a red light and struck a car driven by Wendy Condo. Condo sued Mattox and D H Supply in the State Court of Fulton County, seeking to enforce a settlement agreement she had reached with an independent insurance claims adjustor. Defendants moved to dismiss or transfer the case based on improper venue. The trial court entered final judgment for Condo, implicitly denying defendants' motion. On appeal, defendants argue that the undisputed evidence of record shows that venue was not proper in Fulton County. We agree, and we therefore reverse and remand for transfer to the appropriate court.
Venue in civil cases generally lies in the county where the defendant resides. In a breach of contract action against a corporation, venue is proper in the county "where the contract to be enforced was made or is to be performed, if the corporation has an office and transacts business in that county."
Condo's complaint alleged that Mattox was a resident of Gwin-nett County and that D H Supply's registered agent for service was in Gwinnett County. The complaint further alleged that "venue in Gwinnett County is proper." In defendants' answers, Mattox admitted residing in Gwinnett County and D H Supply admitted that its registered agent could be served there. Both defendants raised the defense of improper venue. With their motion to dismiss or transfer, defendants included a sworn affidavit from D H Supply's president and chief operating officer, who averred that D H Supply is located in Gwinnett County and does not have an office in Fulton County. Thus, the evidence in the record shows without contradiction that Mattox lives in Gwinnett County and that D H Supply has its registered agent and an office there and has no office in Fulton County. Accordingly, venue was not proper in Fulton County, and the trial court erred by denying defendants' motion.
Condo argues that the trial court's venue ruling must be affirmed if there is any evidence to support it. She points out that the trial court held a motion hearing, and she claims that because defendants failed to have that hearing transcribed, we must presume that evidence was presented there to support the court's venue ruling.
We agree that an "any evidence" standard of review would apply to factual findings by the trial court, but the record contains no such findings. Although the court issued a written order stating that it "has jurisdiction over the terms of the contract," that order did not directly mention venue, and it neither included factual findings nor referred to any evidence concerning venue. Defendants assert that the motion hearing was not evidentiary in nature, and nothing in the record shows otherwise. The court's order directing the parties to appear for the hearing referred to it as a "Motion Hearing, regarding Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce Settlement." The order said nothing about the presentation of evidence or, for that matter, about defendants' motion to dismiss or transfer for improper venue. While Condo asks us to speculate that she presented evidence at the hearing supporting a conclusion that venue was proper in Fulton County, she does not deny the essential facts — that Mattox lives in Gwinnett County and D H Supply's office is there. On the contrary, she pled those facts in her complaint.
We therefore reverse the trial court's judgment and remand the case for transfer to the appropriate county. In light of this ruling, we need not address defendants' second claim of error.
Judgment reversed and case remanded with direction.
Ellington, J., concurs. Blackburn, P. J., concurs specially and concurs in the judgment only.
Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. II, Par. VI.
OCGA § 14-2-510 (b) (2).
See Barnes v. Destiny Indus., 185 Ga. App. 630, 631 (365 SE2d 488) (1988) (venue in breach of contract action against corporation was not proper in county where corporation had no office, even if contract had been made there).
See McLendon v. Albany Warehouse Co., 203 Ga. App. 865, 866 (2) (418 SE2d 130) (1992).
See Barnes, supra; Hopkins v. Baker, 258 Ga. App. 14, 15 (1) (572 SE2d 716) (2002).