Case Name: Herbert A. KASTEN, Jr., Appellant, v. Maryanne HASTEN, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1996-07-30
Citations: 926 S.W.2d 549
Docket Number: No. 68612
Parties: Herbert A. KASTEN, Jr., Appellant, v. Maryanne HASTEN, Respondent.
Judges: Before GERALD M. SMITH, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 926
Pages: 549–549

Head Matter:
Herbert A. KASTEN, Jr., Appellant, v. Maryanne HASTEN, Respondent.
No. 68612.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
July 30, 1996.
James M. Smith. Huck, Hasten & Smith, St. Louis, for appellant.
Richard W. Fischer, Clayton, for respondent.
Before GERALD M. SMITH, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Husband appeals, and Wife cross-appeals, from the judgment of dissolution of their marriage.
The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo.banc 1976)[1-3]. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).