Case Name: SORG et al., Appellants, v. WELLS, Respondent
Court: South Dakota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: South Dakota
Decision Date: 1914-01-12
Citations: 33 S.D. 142
Docket Number: 
Parties: SORG et al., Appellants, v. WELLS, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Dakota Reports
Volume: 33
Pages: 142–142

Head Matter:
SORG et al., Appellants, v. WELLS, Respondent.
(144 N. W. 918.)
Appeal — Briefs—No Assignments of Error — Affirmance.
Where appellant’s brief -contains no assignments of error, there is nothing for 'consideration by the appellate court; and the judgment will be affirmed.
(Opinion filed January 12, 1914.)
Appea-l from Circuit 'Court, Spink County. Hon. A uva ETayuor, Judge.
Action 'by S. Jennie Sorg and' others against William Wells. From a judgment for defendant, and from an order denying a new trial, plaintiffs, -appeal.
Affirmed.
See, also, 32 S. D. 157, 142 N. W. 179.
M. Moriarty, for Appellants.
Sterling and Clark, for Respondent.

Opinion:
WHITING, J.
We gather -from appellants' brief thait the appeal herein- is from- the judgment of the trial count, and- also from an order 'denying a new trial. The purported bill of exceptions herein was by this court, upon motion of respondent, stricken from the record. There is left nothing upon wh-ioh the order denying- a new ¡trial -can be reviewed. Appellant's brief contains no assignments of erors, and thus, presents no matter for our consideration; furthermore, the discussion contained in'their brief relates entirely to matters that could only be -considered' upon a record properly settled by the trial court.
The judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.