Case Name: MARTIN COUNTY CONSERVATION ALLIANCE, et al., Petitioners, v. MARTIN COUNTY, et al., Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2013-05-09
Citations: 122 So. 3d 243
Docket Number: No. SC11-2455
Parties: MARTIN COUNTY CONSERVATION ALLIANCE, et al., Petitioners, v. MARTIN COUNTY, et al., Respondents.
Judges: POLSTON, C.J., and LEWIS, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ„ concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 122
Pages: 243–243

Head Matter:
MARTIN COUNTY CONSERVATION ALLIANCE, et al., Petitioners, v. MARTIN COUNTY, et al., Respondents.
No. SC11-2455.
Supreme Court of Florida.
May 9, 2013.
Richard Joseph Grosso, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, for Petitioners.
Stephen Fry, County Attorney and David A. Acton, Senior Assistant County Attorney, Stuart, FL; William L. Hyde, Tallahassee, Florida and Jack J. Aiello, West Palm Beach, FL; and Richard E. Shine, Lathika Mary Thomas, and Sherry A. Spiers, Tallahassee, FL, for Respondents.
David A. Theriaque and S. Brent Spain, of Theriaque & Spain, Tallahassee, FL, for Amicus Curiae American Planning Assocation, Florida Chapter.
Kathy Grünewald, Cindy Huddleston, and Anne Swelick, Tallahassee, FL and Valory Greenfield, Miami, FL; Christopher Michael Jones and Peter P. Sleas-man, Newberry, FL; Randall Challen Berg, Jr., Miami, FL; and Jodi Siegel and Gabriela M. Ruiz, Gainesville, FL, for Ami-cus Curiae Florida Legal Services, Inc., Florida Institutional Legal Services, Inc., Florida Justice Institute, Inc., and Southern Legal Counsel, Inc.
Thomas W. Reese, St. Petersburg, FL, for Amicus Curiae Florida Wildlife Federation.
Edith E. Sheeks, Senior Attorney, Tallahassee, FL and David A. Boyer, Managing Attorney, Hollywood, FL, for Amicus Curiae Disability Rights Florida.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the First District Court of Appeal in Martin County Conservation Alliance v. Martin County, 73 So.3d 856 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. After further consideration, we have determined that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss this review proceeding.
It is so ordered.
POLSTON, C.J., and LEWIS, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ" concur.
PARIENTE, J., did not participate.
QUINCE, J., recused.