Case Name: A.R. LANDMARK CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., Appellant/Respondent, v. HS2D INVESTORS, LTD., d/b/a Waterway Gas, Respondent/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-12-19
Citations: 916 S.W.2d 804
Docket Number: Nos. WD 50258, WD 50338
Parties: A.R. LANDMARK CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., Appellant/Respondent, v. HS2D INVESTORS, LTD., d/b/a Waterway Gas, Respondent/Appellant.
Judges: Before LAURA DENVIR STITH, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and HANNA, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 916
Pages: 804–805

Head Matter:
A.R. LANDMARK CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., Appellant/Respondent, v. HS2D INVESTORS, LTD., d/b/a Waterway Gas, Respondent/Appellant.
Nos. WD 50258, WD 50338.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Dec. 19, 1995.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 30, 1996.
Application to Transfer Denied March 26, 1996.
Ken R. Battis, Fairway, Kan., and Stephen Jay Dennis, Westwood, Kan., for appellant.
Stanley E. Goldstein, Clayton, for respondent.
Before LAURA DENVIR STITH, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and HANNA, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The jury returned a verdict in favor of appellant, A.R. Landmark Construction Company, Inc., for $100,000. A.R. Landmark Construction Company, Inc. appeals the denial of its motion for prejudgment in terest. Defendant, HS2D Investors, Ltd., d/b/a Waterway Gas, maintains in its cross-appeal that the verdict was so grossly excessive as to indicate bias and prejudice. No precedential value would be served by a published opinion. A memorandum setting forth the reasons for the court's decision has been provided the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).