Case Name: Patrick W. Cullinan v. Otto Kuch, et al.
Court: New York Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1902-12-26
Citations: 3 Liquor Tax Rep. 56
Docket Number: 
Parties: Patrick W. Cullinan v. Otto Kuch, et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Liquor Tax Law Reports
Volume: 3
Pages: 56–56

Head Matter:
Supreme Court, New York Special Term.
Reported. N. Y. L. J.,..
December 26, 1902.
Patrick W. Cullinan v. Otto Kuch, et al.
William E. Schenclc, for plaintiff.
K acial tC- Carr ere, for defendant.
Page & Eekley, for defendant Kucli.

Opinion:
Keener, J.:
The contention that the bond is void because of a non-compliance with the Liquor Tax Law is not well taken. (Lyman v. Brucker, 26 Misc. 594; 42 App. Div. 624.) The plaintiff is entitled to judgment on the verdict.