Case Name: Mary Connolly, petitioner-respondent, v. Guardian Casualty Insurance Company of Buffalo, New York, defendant-appellant
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1934-01-05
Citations: 115 N.J. Eq. 74
Docket Number: 
Parties: Mary Connolly, petitioner-respondent, v. Guardian Casualty Insurance Company of Buffalo, New York, defendant-appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 115
Pages: 74–75

Head Matter:
Mary Connolly, petitioner-respondent, v. Guardian Casualty Insurance Company of Buffalo, New York, defendant-appellant.
[Submitted October 28th, 1933.
Decided January 5th, 1934.]
Messrs. Collins •& Corbin (Edward A. Marhley, of counsel), for the appellant.
Mr. Mario Turtur (Fred E. Shepard, of counsel), for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We affirm the opinion below for the reasons given by YiceChancellor Fallon in his opinion. We have nothing to add excepting this: We have' examined the contention of the
appellant that "the counsel fee allowed to counsel for the respondent is excessive." We think it is not. It was $250, and in the circumstances disclosed by the record was quite justified. The respondent is entitled to costs in this court.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Peeskie, Yan Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.