Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Albert HUNT, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-06-17
Citations: 108 S.W.3d 727
Docket Number: No. ED 81501
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Albert HUNT, Appellant.
Judges: Before MARY R. RUSSELL, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 108
Pages: 727–727

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Albert HUNT, Appellant.
No. ED 81501.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
June 17, 2003.
Gwenda R. Robinson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Anne E. Edgington, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before MARY R. RUSSELL, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Alfred Hunt ("Hunt") appeals the judgment on his conviction of one count of sale of a controlled substance in violation of section 195.211 RSMo (2000). Hunt claims the trial court abused its discretion in admitting testimony concerning the arrest of a female present at the scene. Additionally, Hunt claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal because the state failed to present sufficient evidence to establish that Hunt was the person who committed the crime of sale of a controlled substance.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).