Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Omar Jermel DIXON, a/k/a O Dixon, a/k/a Omar Dixon-El, a/k/a Omar Jermel Dixon-El, a/k/a Omar Germal Dixon, a/k/a Omar Jermal Dixon, a/k/a Omar Jermel Dixon El, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-10-18
Citations: 669 F. App'x 646
Docket Number: No. 16-6492
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Omar Jermel DIXON, a/k/a O Dixon, a/k/a Omar Dixon-El, a/k/a Omar Jermel Dixon-El, a/k/a Omar Germal Dixon, a/k/a Omar Jermal Dixon, a/k/a Omar Jermel Dixon El, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 669
Pages: 646–646

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Omar Jermel DIXON, a/k/a O Dixon, a/k/a Omar Dixon-El, a/k/a Omar Jermel Dixon-El, a/k/a Omar Germal Dixon, a/k/a Omar Jermal Dixon, a/k/a Omar Jermel Dixon El, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-6492
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: October 13, 2016
Decided: October 18, 2016
Omar Jermel Dixon, Appellant Pro Se. Brian R. Hood, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appel-lee.
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Omar Jermel Dixon appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2012) motion for reduction of his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find ho reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Dixon, No. 3:02-cr-00209-JRS-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 10, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED