Case Name: Marc B. GOODMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PRAXAIR, INCORPORATED; Praxair Services, Incorporated, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-04-12
Citations: 471 F. App'x 133
Docket Number: No. 11-1440
Parties: Marc B. GOODMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PRAXAIR, INCORPORATED; Praxair Services, Incorporated, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 471
Pages: 133–134

Head Matter:
Marc B. GOODMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PRAXAIR, INCORPORATED; Praxair Services, Incorporated, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 11-1440.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 29, 2012.
Decided: April 12, 2012.
Marc B. Goodman, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Bess, Vedder Price, PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Marc B. Goodman appeals the district court's order granting partial summary judgment for Defendants, the jury's verdict in favor of Defendants, and the district court's order denying his post-judgment motion for judgment as a matter of law in his breach of contract suit. We have thoroughly reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Goodman v. Praxair, Inc., No. 1:04-cv00391-MJG (D. Md. Apr. 2, 2008; Mar. 18, 2009; Nov. 24, 2009; Mar. 30, 2011). We find no basis to recuse the district judge and accordingly deny Goodman's motion that seeks such relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.