Case Name: Harold S. HOBSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cyrus S. EATON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1971-06-28
Citations: 455 F.2d 517
Docket Number: No. 20883
Parties: Harold S. HOBSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cyrus S. EATON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 455
Pages: 517–517

Head Matter:
Harold S. HOBSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cyrus S. EATON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 20883.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
June 28, 1971.
James J. Schiller, Cleveland, Ohio, Marshman, Snyder & Seeley, Cleveland, Ohio, William F. Snyder, Cleveland, Ohio, on brief, for appellant.
Sidney D. L. Jackson, Jr., Cleveland, Ohio, Gary L. Bryenton, Richard R. Hollington, Jr., Baker, Hostetler & Patterson, Cleveland, Ohio, counsel of record, for appellee.
Before EDWARDS, CELEBREZZE and PECK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER.
This case coming on for consideration on the record on appeal and on the briefs and oral arguments of counsel, and it appearing that the substantial issues attempted to be raised on this appeal were resolved in a previous appeal (Hobson v. Eaton, 399 F.2d 781 (6th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 928, 89 S.Ct. 1189, 22 L.Ed.2d 459 (1969)), and the Court having concluded that such additional issues as are attempted to be raised are without merit,
It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court, 327 F.Supp. 74, be and it hereby is affirmed.