Case Name: State of Connecticut v. Roger D. Cawthra
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1992-12-22
Citations: 29 Conn. App. 919
Docket Number: 10596
Parties: State of Connecticut v. Roger D. Cawthra
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Appellate Reports
Volume: 29
Pages: 919–919

Head Matter:
State of Connecticut v. Roger D. Cawthra
(10596)
Dupont, C. J., Daly and Foti, Js.
Argued December 2
decision released December 22, 1992
Helena P. Walton, with whom were William H. Narwold and William H. Bright, Jr., for the appellant (defendant).
Marjorie Allen Dauster, deputy assistant state’s attorney, with whom, on the brief, were John M. Bailey, state’s attorney, and Joan Alexander, assistant state’s attorney, for the appellee (state).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The state concedes and we agree that the instructions of the trial court constitute reversible error.
The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded for a new trial.