Case Name: JOHN ANTONACCI VS. FRISBIE PIE COMPANY
Court: Connecticut Superior Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1935-10-15
Citations: 3 Conn. Supp. 21
Docket Number: File #48275
Parties: JOHN ANTONACCI VS. FRISBIE PIE COMPANY
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Supplement
Volume: 3
Pages: 21–22

Head Matter:
JOHN ANTONACCI VS. FRISBIE PIE COMPANY
Superior Court Fairfield County
File #48275
Present: Hon. ERNEST A. INGLIS, Judge.
Finklestone & Finklestone, Attorneys for the Plaintiff.
Shapiro, Goldstein & Brody, Attorneys for the Defendant.
MEMORANDUM FILED OCTOBER 15, 1935.

Opinion:
INGLIS, J.
The second count of the case clearly sounds in contract. It alleges a breach of the implied warranty of fitness.
In order to recover thereon it must appear therefore that there was privity of contract between the plaintiff and the defendant.
Burkhardt vs. Armour & Co., 115 Conn. 249.
It appears that the contract of sale of the pie in question was between Jennie Mastrianni and Patsy Antonacci. It is not alleged that Mastrianni was the agent of the defendant nor that Patsy Antonacci was the agent of the plaintiff, nor does privity of contract between the plaintiff and. defendant appear in any other way.
The demurrer is therefore sustained on all grounds stated.