Case Name: Lloyd Steven LANE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Juanita H. BAKER; Jewyl E. Dunn; Regina Brooks; Charles L. Mann, Sr.; Elbert T. Buck, Jr., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-04-11
Citations: 223 F. App'x 290
Docket Number: No. 06-7738
Parties: Lloyd Steven LANE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Juanita H. BAKER; Jewyl E. Dunn; Regina Brooks; Charles L. Mann, Sr.; Elbert T. Buck, Jr., Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 223
Pages: 290–291

Head Matter:
Lloyd Steven LANE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Juanita H. BAKER; Jewyl E. Dunn; Regina Brooks; Charles L. Mann, Sr.; Elbert T. Buck, Jr., Defendants—Appellees.
No. 06-7738.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 28, 2007.
Decided: April 11, 2007.
Lloyd Steven Lane, Appellant Pro Se. James Philip Allen, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Lloyd Steven Lane appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lane v. Baker, No. 5:05-ct-00212-H (E.D.N.C. Sept. 12, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.