Case Name: THEODORE MURNICK AND MAXINE MURNICK, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF ASBURY PARK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1983-12-12
Citations: 193 N.J. Super. 1
Docket Number: 
Parties: THEODORE MURNICK AND MAXINE MURNICK, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF ASBURY PARK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 193
Pages: 1–1

Head Matter:
THEODORE MURNICK AND MAXINE MURNICK, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF ASBURY PARK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Submitted October 25, 1983
Decided December 12, 1983.
Before Judges BOTTER, PRESSLER and O’BRIEN.
Hannoch, Weisman, Stern, Besser, Berkowitz & Kinney, P.A., for appellants (Cari G. Weisenfeld and Paul H. Brownstein, of counsel and on the brief).
Rosenblum & Rosenblum, for respondent (Edward G. Rosenblum, of counsel and on the brief).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The judgment appealed from is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Andrew's reported opinion, 5 N.J.Tax 406 (1983).