Case Name: James W. TAYLOR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patricia R. STANSBERRY, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-05-03
Citations: 178 F. App'x 272
Docket Number: No. 05-7718
Parties: James W. TAYLOR, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Patricia R. STANSBERRY, Warden, Respondent—Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 178
Pages: 272–273

Head Matter:
James W. TAYLOR, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Patricia R. STANSBERRY, Warden, Respondent—Appellee.
No. 05-7718.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 27, 2006.
Decided: May 3, 2006.
James W. Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Ap-pellee.
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
James W. Taylor, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Taylor v. Stansberry, No. CA-04-678-5 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 27, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED