Case Name: Charles William LEVY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF FAIRFAX, Virginia; Penelope A. Gross, Supervisor of Mason District; Lerner Corporation, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-10-29
Citations: 79 F. App'x 576
Docket Number: No. 03-1791
Parties: Charles William LEVY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF FAIRFAX, Virginia; Penelope A. Gross, Supervisor of Mason District; Lerner Corporation, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 79
Pages: 576–577

Head Matter:
Charles William LEVY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF FAIRFAX, Virginia; Penelope A. Gross, Supervisor of Mason District; Lerner Corporation, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 03-1791.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 23, 2003.
Decided Oct. 29, 2003.
Charles William Levy, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Charles W. Levy appeals the district court's orders dismissing his civil action and denying his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Levy's motion to proceed in forma pauper-is and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Levy v. County of Fairfax, No. CA-03-706-A (E.D. Va. June 11, 2003; filed June 13, 2003 & entered June 16, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.