Case Name: Disciplinary Counsel v. Riek
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2010-12-06
Citations: 127 Ohio St. 3d 1258
Docket Number: No. 2009-2244
Parties: Disciplinary Counsel v. Riek.
Judges: Brown, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 127
Pages: 1258–1258

Head Matter:
Disciplinary Counsel v. Riek.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Riek, 127 Ohio St.3d 1258, 2010-Ohio-6088.]
(No. 2009-2244
Submitted November 29, 2010
Decided December 6, 2010.)

Opinion:
{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, F. Benjamin Riek III, Attorney Registration No. 0022703, last known business address in Shaker Heights, Ohio.
{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of April 12, 2010, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of 18 months with 12 months stayed on condition, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,
{¶ 3} It is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.
{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.
{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Riek, 125 Ohio St.3d 46, 2010-Ohio-1556, 925 N.E.2d 980.
Brown, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.