Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Dante CARSON, also known as Tae Carson, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-06-17
Citations: 572 F. App'x 291
Docket Number: No. 13-30774
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Dante CARSON, also known as Tae Carson, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING, HAYNES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 572
Pages: 291–291

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Dante CARSON, also known as Tae Carson, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-30774
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
June 17, 2014.
Duane A. Evans, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Kevin G. Boitmann, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Diane Hollenshead Copes, Esq., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, New Orleans, LA,, for Plaintiff-Ap-pellee.
Mark David Plaisance, Esq., Thibodaux, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before KING, HAYNES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Dante Carson has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Carson has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th CiR. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.