Case Name: Mark Reese THOMPSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2012-03-29
Citations: 83 So. 3d 1002
Docket Number: No. 1D11-2623
Parties: Mark Reese THOMPSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: WOLF, PADOVANO, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 83
Pages: 1002–1002

Head Matter:
Mark Reese THOMPSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D11-2623.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
March 29, 2012.
Mark Reese Thompson, pro se, Appellant; Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender, Office of the Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm appellant's judgment and sentence but remand for the trial court to correct the written order of revocation to specify the condition of probation appellant violated. The revocation order states that he violated all of the conditions alleged, but the record shows that the state had dropped two of the three charges. See Nickolas v. State, 66 So.3d 1077 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).
WOLF, PADOVANO, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.