Case Name: Robert FANNING, Betty Fanning, and Bobby Fanning, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Edward H. ANDRES, M.D., et al., Defendants/Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1994-03-08
Citations: 874 S.W.2d 506
Docket Number: No. 64557
Parties: Robert FANNING, Betty Fanning, and Bobby Fanning, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Edward H. ANDRES, M.D., et al., Defendants/Respondents.
Judges: Before GRIMM, P.J., and CARL R. GAERTNER and AHRENS, JJ. '
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 874
Pages: 506–506

Head Matter:
Robert FANNING, Betty Fanning, and Bobby Fanning, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Edward H. ANDRES, M.D., et al., Defendants/Respondents.
No. 64557.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
March 8, 1994.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 7, 1994.
Application to Transfer Denied May 26, 1994.
John C. Milholland, Harrisonville, Donald L. Schlapprizzi, St. Louis, for plaintiffs/appellants.
Ronald R. McMillin, Jefferson City, for defendants/respondents.
Before GRIMM, P.J., and CARL R. GAERTNER and AHRENS, JJ. '

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiffs' filed a pleading which they labeled "Petition for Damages for Tortious Interference with Contracts." The trial court sustained defendants' motions to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action and dismissed the petition with prejudice.
No error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. Rule 84.-16(b).
The trial court's judgment is affirmed.