Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Howard D. FRAZIER, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-11-22
Citations: 176 S.W.3d 212
Docket Number: No. WD 63502
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Howard D. FRAZIER, Appellant.
Judges: Before SMITH, C.J., ULRICH and HARDWICK, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 176
Pages: 212–212

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Howard D. FRAZIER, Appellant.
No. WD 63502.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Nov. 22, 2005.
Ruth Sanders, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before SMITH, C.J., ULRICH and HARDWICK, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Howard Frazier was convicted by jury of first-degree murder and armed criminal action. On appeal, he contends the trial court abused its discretion in allowing the State to present a police officer's testimony that improperly bolstered the testimony of another witness for the prosecution.
Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find that Frazier suffered no prejudice from the error asserted. Accordingly, the convictions are affirmed. The parties have been provided with a Memorandum further explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose.
AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).