Case Name: Craig Robins et al., Respondents, v. Adrian Noveck, Also Known as Andrew Noveck and Andy Noveck, et al., Defendants, and Joseph Feiler et al., Appellants; Joseph Feiler et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. "John Doe", Being the Person Occupying Apartment 3-L, 2621 Palisade Ave., Bronx, New York, Third-Party Defendant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1984-10-11
Citations: 63 N.Y.2d 833
Docket Number: 
Parties: Craig Robins et al., Respondents, v Adrian Noveck, Also Known as Andrew Noveck and Andy Noveck, et al., Defendants, and Joseph Feiler et al., Appellants. Joseph Feiler et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs, v “John Doe”, Being the Person Occupying Apartment 3-L, 2621 Palisade Ave., Bronx, New York, Third-Party Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 63
Pages: 833–835

Head Matter:
Craig Robins et al., Respondents, v Adrian Noveck, Also Known as Andrew Noveck and Andy Noveck, et al., Defendants, and Joseph Feiler et al., Appellants. Joseph Feiler et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs, v “John Doe”, Being the Person Occupying Apartment 3-L, 2621 Palisade Ave., Bronx, New York, Third-Party Defendant.
Argued September 13, 1984;
decided October 11, 1984
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Irving Anolik for appellants.
Kenneth J. Gould for respondents.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (99 AD2d 441).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.