Case Name: Stanley Orr et al. v. S. M. N. Marrs et al.
Court: Supreme Court of Texas
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1932-07-06
Citations: 122 Tex. 53
Docket Number: Application No. 18892
Parties: Stanley Orr et al v. S. M. N. Marrs et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Reports
Volume: 122
Pages: 53–54

Head Matter:
Stanley Orr et al v. S. M. N. Marrs et al.
Application No. 18892.
Decided July 6, 1932.
(52 S. W., 2d Series, 53.)
Woolworth & Baker, of Carthage, for plaintiffs in error.
Brachfield & Wolfe, of Henderson, for defendants in error.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The question as to whether or not the bonds involved in this suit could have been abrogated or can-celled by authority of an election and vote of the people, held for that purpose, is not before us, and we express no opinion upon that question. We have, therefore, dismissed the application for writ of error under the statute for want of jurisdiction.