Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert PITNER, Defendant-Appellant; UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David M. HANSON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1994-05-04
Citations: 23 F.3d 1497
Docket Number: Nos. 90-10299, 90-10318
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert PITNER, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David M. HANSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: HALL and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges, and BURNS, Senior District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 23
Pages: 1497–1498

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert PITNER, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David M. HANSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 90-10299, 90-10318.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 4, 1994.
J. Frank McCabe, Goorjian & McCabe, San Francisco, CA, for defendant-appellant Robert Pitner.
Juliana Drous, Tamburello, Hanlon & Brescianai, San Francisco, CA, for defendant-appellant David Hanson.
Eric J. Swenson, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Francisco, CA, for plaintiff-appellee.
Before: HALL and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges, and BURNS, Senior District Judge.
The Honorable James M. Bums, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
ORDER
Upon consideration of the Supreme Court's decision in Pitner v. United States, — U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 873, 127 L.Ed.2d 70 (1994), and Hanson v. United States, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 873, 127 L.Ed.2d 70 (1994), we hereby withdraw the opinion, see 979 F.2d 156 (9th Cir.1993), and unpublished memorandum, see Nos. 90-10299, 90-10318 (9th Cir. Nov. 2, 1992), in the above-captioned cases.
Further, we reverse and remand the appellants' cases for a new trial consistent with Ratzlaf v. United States, — U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 655, 126 L.Ed.2d 615 (1994).
REVERSED and REMANDED.