Case Name: IN THE MATTER OF MILTON YORMARK, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1972-02-07
Citations: 60 N.J. 175
Docket Number: 
Parties: IN THE MATTER OF MILTON YORMARK, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 60
Pages: 175–175

Head Matter:
IN THE MATTER OF MILTON YORMARK, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW.
Argued January 11, 1972
Decided February 7, 1972.
Mr. Frederick C. Vonhof, for the order.
Mr. Milton Yormark, pro se.

Opinion:
Pee Curiam.
The respondent was convicted of criminal offenses in connection with a conspiracy to defraud an insurance carrier. The convictions were affirmed by the Appellate Division, 117 N. J. Super. 313 (1971), and we have denied certification. 60 N. J. 138 (1972).
The misconduct requires an order of disbarment, and it is so ordered.
We are advised that respondent intends to seek further review of the convictions in other tribunals. Should he prevail in those efforts, he may apply to us for reconsideration of this order.
For disbarment—Chief Justice Weinteaub and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctoe, Hall, Schettino and Mountain—7.
Opposed—Hone.