Case Name: Chase MARCONI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-11-06
Citations: 254 F. App'x 542
Docket Number: No. 06-4263
Parties: Chase MARCONI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before JOHN L. COFFEY, Circuit Judge, KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge and MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 254
Pages: 542–542

Head Matter:
Chase MARCONI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 06-4263.
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Argued Oct. 3, 2007.
Decided Nov. 6, 2007.
Barry A. Schultz, Evanston, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Karen L. Sayón, Social Security Administration, Office of The General Counsel, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before JOHN L. COFFEY, Circuit Judge, KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge and MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
Chase Marconi applied for Disability Insurance Benefits ("DIB"), alleging that he suffers from a mental impairment that became disabling before June 30, 2002, the date his disability insurance lapsed. The issue on appeal is whether the Social Security Administration applied the law correctly and relied on substantial evidence in concluding that Marconi was not disabled as of the date he was last insured. Because the administrative law judge ("ALJ") correctly applied the law in finding that Marconi did not have a severe impairment and substantial evidence supports this finding, we affirm.