Case Name: Martin J. Cassidy et al., respondents, v. Harry Kruvant et al., appellants
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1925-01-19
Citations: 97 N.J. Eq. 372
Docket Number: 
Parties: Martin J. Cassidy et al., respondents, v. Harry Kruvant et al., appellants.
Judges: For affirmance—Tiie Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskirk, Clark, McG-lennon, Kays, JJ. 13.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 97
Pages: 372–373

Head Matter:
Martin J. Cassidy et al., respondents, v. Harry Kruvant et al., appellants.
[Decided January 19th, 1925.]
Mr. Theodore G-. Hindenlang, for the respondents.
Mr. Harry T. Davimos, for the appellants.

Opinion:
Per Curium.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion hied in' the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.
For affirmance—Tiie Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskirk, Clark, McG-lennon, Kays, JJ. 13.
For reversal—None.