Case Name: CUSHMAN AND WAKEFIELD OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC., Appellant/Third Party Defendant, v. SAVERS FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, Appellee/Third Party Plaintiff, and Connecticut Savings Bank, Heritage Savings & Loan Association, Connecticut National Bank, and First Home Savings, Appellees, Third Party Plaintiffs
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1987-12-02
Citations: 519 So. 2d 25
Docket Number: No. 87-1781
Parties: CUSHMAN AND WAKEFIELD OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC., Appellant/Third Party Defendant, v. SAVERS FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, Appellee/Third Party Plaintiff, and Connecticut Savings Bank, Heritage Savings & Loan Association, Connecticut National Bank, and First Home Savings, Appellees, Third Party Plaintiffs.
Judges: RYDER and FRANK, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 519
Pages: 25–26

Head Matter:
CUSHMAN AND WAKEFIELD OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC., Appellant/Third Party Defendant, v. SAVERS FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, Appellee/Third Party Plaintiff, and Connecticut Savings Bank, Heritage Savings & Loan Association, Connecticut National Bank, and First Home Savings, Appellees, Third Party Plaintiffs.
No. 87-1781.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Dec. 2, 1987.
On Motion for Rehearing or Clarification Jan. 20, 1988.
Edward K. Cheffy of Frost & Jacobs, Naples, and Patrick J. O’Connor, Anita B. Weinstein, and Michael Minsker of Cozen and O’Connor, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.
O.H. Storey, III, of Hoover, Jacobs & Storey, Little Rock, Ark., and Robert E. Doyle, Jr., of Asbell, Hains, Doyle and Pickworth, Naples, and Alice Blackwell White of Broad and Cassel, Maitland, for appellee Savers Federal.
Frank X. Kowalski, Jr., and Patricia A. Thomson of Gillette, Pilón and Richman, P.A., Naples, for appellees Connecticut Sav. Bank, et al.

Opinion:
SCHEB, Acting Chief Judge.
Appellant Cushman and Wakefield of Pennsylvania, Inc. (Cushman), challenges a nonfinal order denying its motion to dismiss appellee Savers Federal Savings and Loan Association's complaint pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.140(b)(2). The trial court determined that it could exercise personal jurisdiction over Cush-man, basing its ruling solely on section 48.193(l)(f), Florida Statutes (1985), since it found Cushman was engaged in service activities in this state.
In Aetna Life and Casualty Co. v. Therm-O-Disc, Inc., 511 So.2d 992 (Fla. 1987), the Florida Supreme Court held that there is no personal jurisdiction under section 48.193(l)(f) arising out of an act committed outside this state where the complained of act caused financial injury within the state but caused no personal injury or physical property damage within the state. Aetna was decided subsequent to the trial judge's order in this case, and it compels reversal of the trial court's order. Therefore we do not reach the merits of Cush-man's argument regarding whether or not it had minimum contacts with the State of Florida.
Reversed.
RYDER and FRANK, JJ., concur.