Case Name: Marco ANAYA, Appellant, v. Amy ANAYA, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2008-08-08
Citations: 987 So. 2d 806
Docket Number: No. 5D07-3477
Parties: Marco ANAYA, Appellant, v. Amy ANAYA, Appellee.
Judges: PLEUS and LAWSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 987
Pages: 806–807

Head Matter:
Marco ANAYA, Appellant, v. Amy ANAYA, Appellee.
No. 5D07-3477.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Aug. 8, 2008.
Francisco Colon, Jr., Maitland, for Appellant.
No Appearance for Appellee.

Opinion:
COHEN, J.
Marco Anaya challenges the imputation of income and equitable distribution scheme contained in a final judgment of dissolution. He contends that the trial court failed to make the required findings of fact to support either determination. However, he did not bring these alleged inadequacies to the attention of the trial court by filing a motion for rehearing. A party may not complain about "inadequate findings in a dissolution case unless the alleged defect was brought to the trial court's attention in a motion for rehearing." Mathieu v. Mathieu, 877 So.2d 740, 741 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); see also Matajek v. Skowronska, 927 So.2d 981, 987 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). Accordingly, Anaya has failed to preserve these issues for appellate review.
AFFIRMED.
PLEUS and LAWSON, JJ., concur.