Case Name: In re MARRIAGE OF Deborah Sue GEGG/MACKLIN and James E. Macklin, Jr. Deborah Sue Gegg/Macklin, Petitioner/Respondent, v. James E. Macklin, Jr., Respondent/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-01-30
Citations: 36 S.W.3d 442
Docket Number: No. ED 76734
Parties: In re MARRIAGE OF Deborah Sue GEGG/MACKLIN and James E. Macklin, Jr. Deborah Sue Gegg/Macklin, Petitioner/Respondent, v. James E. Macklin, Jr., Respondent/Appellant.
Judges: Before MARY K. HOFF, C.J., CRANE, J. and ROBERT E. CRIST, Sr. J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 36
Pages: 442–443

Head Matter:
In re MARRIAGE OF Deborah Sue GEGG/MACKLIN and James E. Macklin, Jr. Deborah Sue Gegg/Macklin, Petitioner/Respondent, v. James E. Macklin, Jr., Respondent/Appellant.
No. ED 76734.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Jan. 30, 2001.
P. Daniel Billington, Baylard, Billington & Dempsey, P.C., Union, MO, for respondent.
David L. Hoven, Vincent & Hoven, P.C., Union, MO, for appellant.
Before MARY K. HOFF, C.J., CRANE, J. and ROBERT E. CRIST, Sr. J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a decree of dissolution of marriage. The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carrón, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).