Case Name: Mildred ARTERBURN et al., Appellants, v. Manche EMBERTON et al., Appellees
Court: Kentucky Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Kentucky
Decision Date: 1960-06-10
Citations: 336 S.W.2d 333
Docket Number: 
Parties: Mildred ARTERBURN et al., Appellants, v. Manche EMBERTON et al., Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 336
Pages: 333–333

Head Matter:
Mildred ARTERBURN et al., Appellants, v. Manche EMBERTON et al., Appellees.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky.
June 10, 1960.
Robert C. Carter, Marion Vance, Glasgow, for appellants.
Paul Carter, Abe Carter, Tompkinsville, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is a motion for appeal from a judgment declaring that Fred Walden took a fee simple title to lands devised under the will of his father. The words of the will were, to "Fred Walden my son and his heirs."
There is nothing in the will indicating any ambiguity in this language and in the absence of a contrary intent shown therein, the word "heirs" is a word of limitation and not of purchase. Fischer v. Steepler et al., 152 Ky. 317, 153 S.W. 420. Therefore the named devisee took a fee simple estate. Borders v. Skiles, 295 Ky. 670, 175 S.W.2d 353. (In Bell v. Holdbrook, 299 Ky. 843, 187 S.W.2d 433, it was stated that the rule was thoroughly established, although the opinion referred to two statutes whose applicability is questionable.)
The Chancellor correctly ruled that appellants could not introduce extrinsic evidence to show the testator intended to designate "children" when he used the word "heirs."
The motion for appeal is denied and the judgment stands affirmed.