Case Name: JAMES GOODMAN ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. FRANK H. EGGERS, JUDGE, ETC., RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1934-05-04
Citations: 113 N.J.L. 33
Docket Number: 
Parties: JAMES GOODMAN ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. FRANK H. EGGERS, JUDGE, ETC., RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 113
Pages: 33–33

Head Matter:
JAMES GOODMAN ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. FRANK H. EGGERS, JUDGE, ETC., RESPONDENT.
Submitted February 16, 1934
— Decided May 4, 1934.
For the appellants, Raslcin & Hornstein.
For the respondent, James A. Hamill.

Opinion:
Pee Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Hehee, Yan Buskirk, Heteield, Dear, Dill, JJ. 8.
For reversal — Parker, Lloyd, Perskie, Kays, Wells, JJ. 5.