Case Name: Franklin CURTIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2004-02-27
Citations: 870 So. 2d 186
Docket Number: No. 2D03-2330
Parties: Franklin CURTIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: FULMER and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 870
Pages: 186–186

Head Matter:
Franklin CURTIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D03-2330.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Feb. 27, 2004.
Rehearing Denied March 23, 2004.

Opinion:
DAVIS, Judge.
Franklin Curtis challenges the order denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus. While habeas corpus is not the proper vehicle to address the claims raised by Curtis, they are cognizable in a motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. It is apparent from the trial court's analysis that it treated Curtis' claims as if they were raised in a postconviction motion. Accordingly, finding no error, we affirm without discussion.
Affirmed.
FULMER and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.