Case Name: Roger BENNETT, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-04-26
Citations: 559 So. 2d 1136
Docket Number: No. 74612
Parties: Roger BENNETT, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: EHRLICH, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 559
Pages: 1136–1136

Head Matter:
Roger BENNETT, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 74612.
Supreme Court of Florida.
April 26, 1990.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Andrea Steffen, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for petitioner.
Robert A. Butterw'orth, Atty. Gen., and David R. Gemmer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for respondent.

Opinion:
McDonald, justice.
In Bennett v. State, 546 So.2d 1192, 1192 (Fla.2d DCA 1989), the district court certified the following question as being of great public interest: "Does section 893.-13(l)(e), Florida Statutes (1987), violate the one subject rule of article III, section 6 of the Florida Constitution?" We answered this question in the negative and held the statute to be constitutional in Burch v. State, 558 So.2d 1 (Fla.1990), and, therefore, approve Bennett.
It is so ordered.
EHRLICH, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.