Case Name: Jesse J. HILL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2017-10-27
Citations: 228 So. 3d 730
Docket Number: Case No. 5D16-3961
Parties: Jesse J. HILL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: COHEN, C.J., and EVANDER and BERGER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 228
Pages: 730–730

Head Matter:
Jesse J. HILL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Case No. 5D16-3961
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Opinion filed October 27, 2017
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Steven N. Gosney, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Lori N. Hagan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Ap-pellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We' affirm Jesse Hill's convictions, but remand for the entry of a proper nunc pro tunc order finding Hill competent to stand trial. See Francis v. State, 65 So.3d 103 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011) (holding that where trial court made oral findings that defendant was competent but failed to enter written order of competency, proper remedy was to affirm judgment and -remand case to trial court for entry of nunc pró tunc order finding defendant competent to stand trial).
AFFIRMED; REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS TO ENTER PROPER NUNC PRO TUNC ORDER.
COHEN, C.J., and EVANDER and BERGER, JJ., concur.