Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raheim Antone CARTER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-08-21
Citations: 245 F. App'x 673
Docket Number: No. 06-30555
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raheim Antone CARTER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: KLEINFELD, SILVERMAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 245
Pages: 673–674

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raheim Antone CARTER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-30555.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 13, 2007.
Filed Aug. 21, 2007.
Frank R. Papagni, Jr., Esq., USEU— Office of the U.S. Attorney, Eugene, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Kelly R. Beckley, Esq., Eugene, OR, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: KLEINFELD, SILVERMAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Raheim Antone Carter appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for conspiracy to commit bank robbery and bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 and 2113(a). We dismiss the appeal.
When Carter entered into the plea agreement with the government, he waived his right to appeal from the district court's entry of judgment and the imposition of a sentence provided that the sentence was consistent with his plea agreement. Because Carter was sentenced to a range within the plea agreement, his appeal waiver is enforceable. See United States v. Jeronimo, 398 F.3d 1149, 1152-53 (9th Cir.2005); see also United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182-83 (9th Cir.2000).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.