Case Name: T.L.D., a Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2019-03-29
Citations: 266 So. 3d 881
Docket Number: Case No. 5D18-1315
Parties: T.L.D., a Child, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 266
Pages: 881–881

Head Matter:
T.L.D., a Child, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Case No. 5D18-1315
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Opinion filed March 29, 2019
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Ailene S. Rogers, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kristen L. Davenport, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See State v. Raleigh , 686 So.2d 621, 622-23 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996) (rejecting argument that section 800.04, Florida Statutes, is unconstitutional as applied to defendant because it precluded the defense of consent of minor victim, observing that "[i]t cannot be of any constitutional or logical significance to the child victim if the perpetrator is only seventeen-sixteen . or ten").
WALLIS, LAMBERT, and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.