Case Name: AUH-HAHNEMANN, Petitioner, v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (Ersie ABEJO), Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2006-07-27
Citations: 906 A.2d 531
Docket Number: No. 938 MAL 2003
Parties: AUH-HAHNEMANN, Petitioner, v. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (Ersie ABEJO), Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 906
Pages: 531–532

Head Matter:
AUH-HAHNEMANN, Petitioner, v. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (Ersie ABEJO), Respondents.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
July 27, 2006.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 27th day of July 2006, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is denied.
Mr. Justice Saylor dissents, as he views the Commonwealth Court's present holding, which precludes Employer from requesting an IRE based upon its failure to make such a request within the sixty-day time limitation of Section 306(a.2)(l), see 77 P.S. 511.2(1), as inconsistent with the reasoning of Gardner v. WCAB (Genesis Health Ventures), 585 Pa. 366, 382-84, 888 A.2d 758, 768 (2005).