Case Name: Commonwealth v. Truitt, Appellant
Court: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1978-04-13
Citations: 255 Pa. Super. 622
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 687
Parties: Commonwealth v. Truitt, Appellant.
Judges: HOFFMAN, J., dissented on the grounds that the support order of the lower court is excessive. He would remand to re-evaluate the needs and relative incomes and assets of the parties.
Reporter: Pennsylvania Superior Court Reports
Volume: 255
Pages: 622–623

Head Matter:
387 A.2d 920
Commonwealth v. Truitt, Appellant.
Argued September 15, 1977.
James M. Potter, with him Liever, Hyman & Potter, for appellant;
Bernard Mendelsohn, with him Baskin, Mendelsohn & Leisawitz, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Opinion:
Order affirmed.
HOFFMAN, J., dissented on the grounds that the support order of the lower court is excessive. He would remand to re-evaluate the needs and relative incomes and assets of the parties.
WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.