Case Name: Derek N. JARVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The PAPER SOURCE, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-02-25
Citations: 556 F. App'x 272
Docket Number: No. 13-2368
Parties: Derek N. JARVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The PAPER SOURCE, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 556
Pages: 272–273

Head Matter:
Derek N. JARVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The PAPER SOURCE, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 13-2368.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 20, 2014.
Decided: Feb. 25, 2014.
Derek N. Jarvis, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Joseph Flaherty, Joon Hwang, Littler Mendelson PC, McLean, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Derek N. Jarvis appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil complaint alleging employment discrimination be cause he failed to serve Defendant within 120 days of filing his complaint, in violation of Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m). We find no abuse of discretion by the district court for dismissing the complaint under Rule 4(m). See Shao v. Link Cargo (Taiwan) Ltd., 986 F.2d 700, 708 (4th Cir.1993) (providing review standard). Finding no reversible error, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jarvis v. The Paper Source, No. 1:12-cv-01454-CMH-TRJ (E.D.Va. Oct. 28, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.