Case Name: EDMUND WILSON, ATTORNEY-GENERAL, APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM H. O'NEILL, RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1914-05-08
Citations: 86 N.J.L. 377
Docket Number: 
Parties: EDMUND WILSON, ATTORNEY-GENERAL, APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM H. O’NEILL, RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 86
Pages: 377–377

Head Matter:
EDMUND WILSON, ATTORNEY-GENERAL, APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM H. O’NEILL, RESPONDENT.
Argued March 13, 1914
Decided May 8, 1914.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 85 N. J. L. 92.
Bor the appellant, Nelson B. OasMll.
Bor the respondent, Borden T>. Whiling.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Cítancelloii, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Bogert, Yredenburgii, White, Heppenheimer, JJ. 10.
For reversal — Hone.