Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel WOODS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-05-04
Citations: 324 F. App'x 229
Docket Number: No. 08-8602
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel WOODS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 324
Pages: 229–230

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel WOODS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-8602.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 23, 2009.
Decided: May 4, 2009.
Daniel Woods, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Daniel Woods appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Woods, No. 3:05-cr-00025-JPB-JES-1 (N.D.W.Va. Dec. 8, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.