Case Name: In the Matter of the Compensation of CROWLEY, Petitioner, v. PUBLISHERS PAPER COMPANY, et al, Respondents
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1980-09-22
Citations: 48 Or. App. 235
Docket Number: WCB No. 78-1274, CA 17125
Parties: In the Matter of the Compensation of CROWLEY, Petitioner, v. PUBLISHERS PAPER COMPANY, et al, Respondents.
Judges: Before Joseph, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Warren, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 48
Pages: 235–235

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted August 11,
affirmed September 22, 1980
In the Matter of the Compensation of CROWLEY, Petitioner, v. PUBLISHERS PAPER COMPANY, et al, Respondents.
(WCB No. 78-1274, CA 17125)
616 P2d 581
Robert K. Udziela, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Pozzi, Wilson, Atchison, Kahn & O’Leary, Portland.
Margaret H. Leek Leiberan, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With her on the brief was Lang, Klein, Wolf, Smith, Griffith & Hallmark, Portland.
Before Joseph, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Warren, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Claimant failed to prove that his work activity for this employer caused his underlying disease to worsen or that a change in his condition, if there was any, caused him disability or time loss or required medical services. Weller v. Union Carbide, 288 Or 27, 602 P2d 259 (1979). Moreover, even if his proof had satisfied the Wellertests, his work for this employer was not the last injurious exposure. Inkley v. Forest Fiber Products Co., 288 Or 337, 605 P2d 1175 (1980).
Affirmed.