Case Name: Jessie ROYSTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NHP MANAGEMENT COMPANY; Apartment Investment & Management Company, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-05-16
Citations: 34 F. App'x 145
Docket Number: No. 01-2193
Parties: Jessie ROYSTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NHP MANAGEMENT COMPANY; Apartment Investment & Management Company, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 34
Pages: 145–145

Head Matter:
Jessie ROYSTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NHP MANAGEMENT COMPANY; Apartment Investment & Management Company, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 01-2193.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 30, 2002.
Decided May 16, 2002.
Edith A. Lawson-Jackson, E.A. Lawson-Jackson & Associates, Bowie, Maryland, for Appellant. Jonathan W. Greenbaum, Adrian V. Nelson, II, Gina Janeiro Lisher, Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky & Popeo, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, and WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Jessie Royster appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to Defendants in this action brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, and 42 U.S.C.A. § 1981 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Royster v. NHP Management Co., No. CA-00-290-L (D.Md. Sept. 13, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.