Case Name: In the Matter of D. G., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. D. G., Defendant-Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2009-11-18
Citations: 232 Or. App. 210
Docket Number: 081171962; A140724
Parties: In the Matter of D. G., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. D. G., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Sercombe, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 232
Pages: 210–211

Head Matter:
Submitted October 2,
reversed November 18, 2009
In the Matter of D. G., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. D. G., Defendant-Appellant.
Multnomah County Circuit Court
081171962; A140724
221 P3d 801
Rebecca Carter filed the brief for appellant.
John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Jerome Lidz, Solicitor General, and Christina M. Hutchins, Senior Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Sercombe, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing Trim as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that he is unable to provide for his basic needs because of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(1)(d). The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. On de novo review of the record, we accept the state's concession and reverse.
Reversed.