Case Name: Thomas L. Salisbury, Defendant in Error, v. Edmund Wright et al., Plaintiffs in Error
Court: Supreme Court of Missouri
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1865-03
Citations: 35 Mo. 481
Docket Number: 
Parties: Thomas L. Salisbury, Defendant in Error, v. Edmund Wright et al., Plaintiffs in Error.
Judges: Judge Bay concurs.
Reporter: Missouri Reports
Volume: 35
Pages: 481–482

Head Matter:
Thomas L. Salisbury, Defendant in Error, v. Edmund Wright et al., Plaintiffs in Error.
Practice. — No point saved for the action of the court.
Error to Court of Common Pleas of St. Louis County.
M. L. Gray, for defendant in error.
E. Peacock, for plaintiffs in error.

Opinion:
Dryden, Judge
delivered the opinion of the court.'
In this case the defendants below moved the court to set aside the judgment by default, because of the insufficiency of the service of the process on two of the defendants. The refusal of the court to sustain his motion is the only error assigned. The decision upon the motion was not excepted to. There is no bill of exceptions in the record. There is therefore no ground for the interference of this court.
Let the judgment be affix'med.
Judge Bay concurs.