Case Name: Matthew Louis JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DARR, Correctional Officer, Captain of the Prison, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-06-21
Citations: 530 F. App'x 661
Docket Number: No. 12-55532
Parties: Matthew Louis JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DARR, Correctional Officer, Captain of the Prison, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before: TALLMAN, M. SMITH, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 530
Pages: 661–662

Head Matter:
Matthew Louis JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DARR, Correctional Officer, Captain of the Prison, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 12-55532.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 18, 2013.
Filed June 21, 2013.
Matthew Louis Johnson, Soledad, CA, pro se.
Bryan Kao, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before: TALLMAN, M. SMITH, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
California state prisoner Matthew Louis Johnson appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1117 (9th Cir.2003), and affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Johnson's action without prejudice because Johnson failed to exhaust the prison grievance procedures concerning his claims. See Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 93-95, 126 S.Ct. 2378, 165 L.Ed.2d 368 (2006) (holding that "proper exhaustion" is mandatory and requires adherence to administrative procedural rules).
Darr's request for judicial notice is denied.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.