Case Name: In the Interest of B.V., B.V., K.V., and B.V., minors Juvenile Officer, Petitioner/Respondent, v. F.V., Respondent, and K.V., Respondent/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2010-03-16
Citations: 307 S.W.3d 683
Docket Number: No. ED 92886
Parties: In the Interest of B.V., B.V., K.V., and B.V., minors Juvenile Officer, Petitioner/Respondent, v. F.V., Respondent, and K.V., Respondent/Appellant.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 307
Pages: 683–683

Head Matter:
In the Interest of B.V., B.V., K.V., and B.V., minors Juvenile Officer, Petitioner/Respondent, v. F.V., Respondent, and K.V., Respondent/Appellant.
No. ED 92886.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
March 16, 2010.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 19, 2010.
David R. Crosby, Hillsboro, MO, for appellant.
Scott T. Summers, Hillsboro, MO, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Mother appeals from the judgment of the trial court terminating her parental rights to her four minor children. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).