Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. ROBERT JAMES BETTS, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1977-10-24
Citations: 31 Or. App. 377
Docket Number: No. 76A-2315, CA 8538
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. ROBERT JAMES BETTS, Appellant.
Judges: Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Thornton and Tanzer, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 31
Pages: [377]–[379]

Head Matter:
Submitted on records and briefs September 28,
affirmed October 24, 1977
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. ROBERT JAMES BETTS, Appellant.
(No. 76A-2315, CA 8538)
570 P2d 114
Robert P. Coblens, La Grande, filed the brief for appellant.
James A. Redden, Attorney General, and Al J. Laue, Solicitor General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Thornton and Tanzer, Judges.
PER CURIAM.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The defendant, having been convicted upon trial to the court of a traffic crime, appeals, contending there was no evidence sufficient to make a question of fact. The testimony of one of the witnesses, if believed, was sufficient to support a finding of guilty. The trial court apparently believed that witness.
Affirmed.