Case Name: New York Rapid Transit Corporation, Respondent, v. Bronx Investment Company, Appellant, Impleaded with Another, Defendant. (Action No. 1.)
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1926-03
Citations: 216 A.D. 767
Docket Number: 
Parties: New York Rapid Transit Corporation, Respondent, v. Bronx Investment Company, Appellant, Impleaded with Another, Defendant. (Action No. 1.)
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 216
Pages: 767–767

Head Matter:
New York Rapid Transit Corporation, Respondent, v. Bronx Investment Company, Appellant, Impleaded with Another, Defendant. (Action No. 1.)

Opinion:
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. We hold that the complaint states a cause of action against the appellant, and, for the purposes of this motion, that its allegations support the respondent's contention that the after-acquired property clauses in the mortgages of the Brooklyn Union Elevated Railroad Company and the Kings County_ Elevated Railroad Company do not affect the plaintiff's title to the piece of real estate involved in this action. Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Manning, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.