Case Name: ELMO LAW, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada
Jurisdiction: Nevada
Decision Date: 1970-03-05
Citations: 86 Nev. 161
Docket Number: No. 6033
Parties: ELMO LAW, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Nevada Reports
Volume: 86
Pages: 161–162

Head Matter:
ELMO LAW, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.
No. 6033
March 5, 1970
466 P.2d 656
James D. Santini, Public Defender, and Robert G. Legakes, Deputy Public Defender, Clark County, for Appellant.
Harvey Dickerson, Attorney General, George E. Franklin, Jr., District Attorney, and Addeliar D. Guy, Deputy District Attorney, Clark County, for Respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION
Per Curiam:
The briefs and the record on appeal having been given full consideration, and finding that there is substantial competent evidence in the record to support the jury verdict below, and that the appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error, the respondent's motion to dismiss this appeal is granted, and this appeal is dismissed. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Sanchez v. State, 85 Nev. 95, 450 P.2d 793 (1969).