Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Michael T. LACY, Appellant; Michael T. LACY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1992-07-21
Citations: 835 S.W.2d 539
Docket Number: Nos. 59625, 61064
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Michael T. LACY, Appellant. Michael T. LACY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 835
Pages: 539–540

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Michael T. LACY, Appellant. Michael T. LACY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 59625, 61064.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
July 21, 1992.
Application to Transfer Denied Sept. 22, 1992.
David C. Hemingway, John Klosterman, Emily Blood, David Bruns, St. Louis, for appellant.
William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Robert Alan Kelly, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Michael Lacy, appeals from his jury trial conviction in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County of one count of sale of cocaine, RSMo § 195.020 (1986), for which he was sentenced to five years' imprisonment. Appellant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentia-ry hearing. We affirm. We have reviewed the transcript, legal files and briefs of the parties and find no error on the part of the trial court. Nor do we find the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the motion court to be clearly erroneous. As we further find that an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm appellant's conviction pursuant to Rule 30.-25(b) and the denial of appellant's Rule 29.15 motion pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our holding.