Case Name: C. Pavlou, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Gaetano Gargano et al., Defendants. (Action No. 1.); Cardon Brick Corp., Appellant, v. Frank Cusimano et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant. (Action No. 2.); Gaetano Gargano et al., Third-Party PlaintiffsRespondents, v. Carmine Sirico et al., Third-Party DefendantsAppellants. (Action No. 3.)
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1996-06-24
Citations: 228 A.D.2d 632
Docket Number: 
Parties: C. Pavlou, Inc., Plaintiff, v Gaetano Gargano et al., Defendants. (Action No. 1.) Cardon Brick Corp., Appellant, v Frank Cusimano et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant. (Action No. 2.) Gaetano Gargano et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents, v Carmine Sirico et al., Third-Party DefendantsAppellants. (Action No. 3.)
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 228
Pages: 632–632

Head Matter:
C. Pavlou, Inc., Plaintiff, v Gaetano Gargano et al., Defendants. (Action No. 1.) Cardon Brick Corp., Appellant, v Frank Cusimano et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant. (Action No. 2.) Gaetano Gargano et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents, v Carmine Sirico et al., Third-Party DefendantsAppellants. (Action No. 3.)
[644 NYS2d 994]

Opinion:
The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in relieving the default of the third-party plaintiffs in responding to the third-party defendants' notice to admit (see, CPLR 3123, 2005; Gutenplan v Dauman, 154 AD2d 337). O'Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.