Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Crandale WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-03-26
Citations: 562 F. App'x 155
Docket Number: No. 13-7913
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Crandale WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 562
Pages: 155–155

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Crandale WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-7913.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 6, 2014.
Decided: March 26, 2014.
Michael Crandale Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Robert J. Higdon, Jr., Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael Crandale Williams appeals the district court's order granting his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) and reducing his sentence to the low end of his amended Guidelines range. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. See United States v. Williams, No. 2:95-cr-00009-H-l (E.D.N.C. Nov. 7, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Williams contends he is entitled to a further reduction.