Case Name: Wayne Newton PHELPS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee
Court: Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1972-11-15
Citations: 503 P.2d 885
Docket Number: No. A-17717
Parties: Wayne Newton PHELPS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.
Judges: BRETT, J., concurs.
Reporter: Pacific Reporter 2d
Volume: 503
Pages: 885–886

Head Matter:
Wayne Newton PHELPS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.
No. A-17717.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.
Nov. 15, 1972.
Elliott Howe, Tulsa, for appellant.
Larry Derryberry, Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

Opinion:
OPINION
BUSSEY, Presiding Judge:
Appellant, Wayne Newton Phelps, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged, tried, and convicted in the District Court of Tulsa County, Oklahoma for the offense of Shooting With Intent to Kill; his punishment was fixed at a term of not less than seven (7) years nor more than ten (10) years imprisonment and from said judgment and sentence, a timely appeal has been perfected to this Court.
This cause was lodged in this Court on September 12, 1972. No brief was filed nor was an extension of time in. which to file a brief requested, thereafter. On October 31, 1972, by order of this Court, the cause was summarily submitted for opinion in accordance with the rules of this Court.
We have consistently held that where the defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction and no briefs are filed in support of the petition in error, this Court will examine the records only for fundamental error. If none appears of record, the judgment will be affirmed. Hendricks v. State, Okl.Cr, 497 P.2d 425.
We have carefully examined the record and reviewed the testimony and petition in error in the instant case and find no fundamental error. The record discloses that defendant was afforded a fair and impartial trial and the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict of the jury. There being no apparent error in the record on appeal, it is the opinion of this Court that the judgment and sentence should be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.
BRETT, J., concurs.