Case Name: State, ex rel. Universal Realty Co., v. Brown, Secretary of State
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1925-06-16
Citations: 113 Ohio St. 698
Docket Number: No. 19037
Parties: State, ex rel. Universal Realty Co., v. Brown, Secretary of State.
Judges: Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Robinson, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, New Service
Volume: 113
Pages: 698–698

Head Matter:
State, ex rel. Universal Realty Co., v. Brown, Secretary of State.
(No. 19037
Decided June 16, 1925.)
Mr. William W. Bosensweig, for relator.
Mr. G. G. Grabbe, attorney general; Mr. H. H. Griswold, and Mr. G. 8. Younger, for respondent.

Opinion:
The court finds that the plaintiff is not entitled to a writ of mandamus as prayed for in the petition, for the reason that the transaction is one in which other persons are concerned and other interests involved, and the relief sought cannot be afforded by a writ of mandamus.
Writ denied.
Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Robinson, JJ., concur.