Case Name: THORNTON BRADLEY v. JAMES JONES
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 1877-01
Citations: 76 N.C. 204
Docket Number: 
Parties: THORNTON BRADLEY v. JAMES JONES.
Judges: 
Reporter: North Carolina Reports
Volume: 76
Pages: 204–205

Head Matter:
THORNTON BRADLEY v. JAMES JONES.
Practice — Supreme Court — Record.
When the record of a case brought up on appeal to this Court is imperfect, the case will bo remanded to the Court below
Civil ActioN to recover possession of land, tried at Eall Term, 1876, of Polii Superior Court, before Schenck, J.
In consequence of an imperfect record there was no decision upon the merits and the case was rema..ded to the Court below.
Messrs. Smith £ Strong, for plaintiff.
Messrs. M. JET. 'Justice and W. J. Montgomery, for defendant..

Opinion:
Reade, J,
There is no complaint'in the record. There is only an amended answer. There is no statement of the case made out by tbe appellant and none by the appellee ; nor is there any agreement that His Honor should make one. There is however a statement by His Honor that it was an action for two parcels ' of land, that the plaintiff offered in evidence a number of deeds, none of which are set out or appended, some of which were admitted as color of title only, .one rejected because not properly proved and registered, that a number of witnesses were introduced as to possession and boundaries, and that he nonsuited the plaintiff. But why he nonsuited him is not stated.
There are no points stated or questions presented for the decision of this Court. It is possible that we might hit upon the matters in dispute, but we cannot jeopardize the rights of the parties upon such records.
The case is remanded, each party paying his own costs in this Court.
Pee, Cx/RiAM. Judgment accordingly.