Case Name: STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JOEL TUCKER
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1999-05-18
Citations: 248 Conn. 668
Docket Number: SC 16032
Parties: STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JOEL TUCKER
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 248
Pages: 668–669

Head Matter:
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JOEL TUCKER
(SC 16032)
Borden, Berdon, Norcott, Katz and McDonald, Js.
Argued April 22
officially released May 18, 1999
James A. Shanley, Jr., special public defender, for the appellant (defendant).
Stephen J. Sedensky III, senior assistant state’s attorney, with whom, on the brief, was Jonathan C. Benedict, state’s attorney, for the appellee (state).

Opinion:
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
After examining the record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted.
The appeal is dismissed.
We granted the defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the judgment of the Appellate Court; State v. Tucker, 50 Conn. App. 506, 719 A.2d 1170 (1998); limited to the following issue: "Did the Appellate Court, properly conclude that General Statutes (Rev. to 1995) § 53-21 was not unconstitutionally vague as applied to the defendant's conduct?" State v. Tucker, 247 Conn. 928, 719 A.2d 1170 (1998).