Case Name: Vernon ELLIOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kathleen J. ELLIOTT, Defendant-Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-09-07
Citations: 999 S.W.2d 753
Docket Number: No. ED 74694
Parties: Vernon ELLIOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kathleen J. ELLIOTT, Defendant-Respondent.
Judges: Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 999
Pages: 753–753

Head Matter:
Vernon ELLIOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kathleen J. ELLIOTT, Defendant-Respondent.
No. ED 74694.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Sept. 7, 1999.
William M. Spieler, St. Louis, for appellant.
Alan D. Arand, Union, for respondent.
Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Vernon Elliott appeals from an Amended Judgment/Decree of Dissolution of Marriage entered by the Family Court of the County of St. Louis. We find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value.
We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).