Case Name: Carl DAVIS, Terry Davis, Richard Dale Davis, Donald R. Davis, and Doris Jean McCoy, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. James L. SCHULZE, Personal Representative of the Estate of William Schulze, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-06-18
Citations: 77 S.W.3d 708
Docket Number: No. ED 80293
Parties: Carl DAVIS, Terry Davis, Richard Dale Davis, Donald R. Davis, and Doris Jean McCoy, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. James L. SCHULZE, Personal Representative of the Estate of William Schulze, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., P.J., and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 77
Pages: 708–709

Head Matter:
Carl DAVIS, Terry Davis, Richard Dale Davis, Donald R. Davis, and Doris Jean McCoy, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. James L. SCHULZE, Personal Representative of the Estate of William Schulze, Defendant/Respondent.
No. ED 80293.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
June 18, 2002.
John T. Bruere, Troy, MO, for appellant.
Thomas B. Burkemper, Troy, MO, for respondent.
Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., P.J., and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiffs, Carl Davis, Terry Davis, Richard Dale Davis, Donald R. Davis, and Doris Jean McCoy, appeal from the trial court's judgment finding in favor of Defendant William Schulze on Plaintiffs' petition for conversion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
. William Schulze died on April 26, 2002, and James L. Schulze, William Schulze's personal representative, has been substituted as a party-