Case Name: Michael J. FINGAR and E. Neal Bonavia, Appellants, v. Roger A. LEVINE and Laura E. Levine, his wife, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1983-04-19
Citations: 429 So. 2d 840
Docket Number: No. 82-1318
Parties: Michael J. FINGAR and E. Neal Bonavia, Appellants, v. Roger A. LEVINE and Laura E. Levine, his wife, Appellees.
Judges: Before HENDRY, BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 429
Pages: 840–841

Head Matter:
Michael J. FINGAR and E. Neal Bonavia, Appellants, v. Roger A. LEVINE and Laura E. Levine, his wife, Appellees.
No. 82-1318.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 19, 1983.
Michael J. Fingar, Miami, for appellants.
Mark Perlman, Fort Lauderdale, for ap-pellees.
Before HENDRY, BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the trial court in favor of the appellees on the appellants' action for specific performance of a contract to sell real estate is affirmed upon a holding that the contract, as the trial court correctly concluded, lacked the clarity, definiteness, and certainty required for specific performance, see, e.g., Bay Club, Inc. v. Brickell Bay Club, Inc., 293 So.2d 137 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974), and that these deficiencies were not overcome by any evidence which would support a contrary conclusion, notwith standing that the appellants were placed on notice of the necessity of presenting such evidence and failed to avail themselves of the opportunity to do so.
Affirmed.