Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joseph Elioff, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2017-07-07
Citations: 152 A.D.3d 1158
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph Elioff, Appellant.
Judges: Present — Smith, J.P., Garni, NeMoyer, Curran and Troutman, JJ.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 152
Pages: 1158–1159

Head Matter:
Fourth Department,
July, 2017
(July 7, 2017)
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph Elioff, Appellant.
[54 NYS3d 915]

Opinion:
Appeal from a judg ment of the Onondaga County Court (Thomas J. Miller, J.), rendered March 21, 2014. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of rape in the first degree.
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of rape in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.35 [3]). We agree with defendant that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid because " 'the minimal inquiry made by County Court [during the plea proceeding] was insufficient to establish that the court engage [d] . . . defendant in an adequate colloquy to ensure that the waiver of the right to appeal was a knowing and voluntary choice' " (People v Williams, 136 AD3d 1280, 1281 [2016], lv denied 27 NY3d 1141 [2016], lv denied 29 NY3d 954 [2017]). Nevertheless, contrary to defendant's contention, we conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh and severe.
Present — Smith, J.P., Garni, NeMoyer, Curran and Troutman, JJ.