Case Name: James L. SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-08-01
Citations: 197 S.W.3d 236
Docket Number: No. WD 66053
Parties: James L. SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Presiding Judge, ROBERT G. ULRICH, Judge, and RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 197
Pages: 236–236

Head Matter:
James L. SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 66053.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Aug. 1, 2006.
Irene C. Karens, Public Defender Office, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Shaun Mackelprang & Dora A. Fichter, Office of Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Presiding Judge, ROBERT G. ULRICH, Judge, and RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
James Scott appeals the motion court's denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief from his guilty-plea conviction for attempt to manufacture methamphetamine. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record, and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).