Case Name: De Ross Dailey, Respondent, v. Daniel H. Stoll, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1912-10
Citations: 152 A.D. 954
Docket Number: 
Parties: De Ross Dailey, Respondent, v. Daniel H. Stoll, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 152
Pages: 954–954

Head Matter:
De Ross Dailey, Respondent, v. Daniel H. Stoll, Appellant.

Opinion:
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., and Foote, J., who dissented upon the grounds: First, that service Of notice under the Employers' Liability Act was not' waived,- and, second, that if the bolt was improperly suspended, it Was a detail of the work for which defendant was not liable.
See Labor Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 31; Laws of 1909, chap. 36), § 201, as amd, by Laws of 1910,' chap. 352.— [Rkp, •