Case Name: Harry Brammall v. Louis LaRose
Court: Vermont Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Vermont
Decision Date: 1933-05-02
Citations: 105 Vt. 352
Docket Number: 
Parties: Harry Brammall v. Louis LaRose.
Judges: Present: Powers, C. J., Slack, Moulton, Thompson, and Graham, JJ.
Reporter: Vermont Reports
Volume: 105
Pages: 352–353

Head Matter:
Harry Brammall v. Louis LaRose.
February Term, 1933.
Present: Powers, C. J., Slack, Moulton, Thompson, and Graham, JJ.
Opinion filed May 2, 1933.
Clayton H. Kinney for the defendant.
F. G. Hinchey and Fenton, Wing, Morse & Jeffords for the plaintiff.

Opinion:
Moulton, J.
The facts in this case are the same as those in the ease of Annie Brammall v. Louis LaRose, ante page 345, and the decision is the same for the reasons therein given.
Judgment affirmed, and cause remanded.