Case Name: James Meshach LOMAX, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bobby SHEARIN, Warden; The Reduction in Violence Committee, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-03-01
Citations: 468 F. App'x 340
Docket Number: No. 11-7370
Parties: James Meshach LOMAX, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Bobby SHEARIN, Warden; The Reduction in Violence Committee, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 468
Pages: 340–341

Head Matter:
James Meshach LOMAX, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Bobby SHEARIN, Warden; The Reduction in Violence Committee, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 11-7370.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 27, 2012.
Decided: March 1, 2012.
James Meshach Lomax, Appellant Pro Se. Rex Schultz Gordon, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James Meshach Lomax appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lomax v. Shearin, No. 8:09-cv-02708-DKC, 2011 WL 1792067 (D. Md. May 9, 2011) & (Sept. 30, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.