Case Name: Andrew KONCZAL, Employee, v. HAGE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and General Casualty Insurance Company, Respondents (A09-1594), Relators (A09-1595), and Fairview Health Services, Relator (A09-1594), Respondent (A09-1595)
Court: Minnesota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Minnesota
Decision Date: 2010-01-04
Citations: 776 N.W.2d 171
Docket Number: Nos. A09-1594, A09-1595
Parties: Andrew KONCZAL, Employee, v. HAGE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and General Casualty Insurance Company, Respondents (A09-1594), Relators (A09-1595), and Fairview Health Services, Relator (A09-1594), Respondent (A09-1595).
Judges: 
Reporter: North Western Reporter 2d
Volume: 776
Pages: 171–171

Head Matter:
Andrew KONCZAL, Employee, v. HAGE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and General Casualty Insurance Company, Respondents (A09-1594), Relators (A09-1595), and Fairview Health Services, Relator (A09-1594), Respondent (A09-1595).
Nos. A09-1594, A09-1595.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
Jan. 4, 2010.
Robin Simpson, Radd Kulseth, Aafedt, Forde, Gray, Monson & Hager, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for relators (A09-1595).
Roderick C. Cosgriff, Gregory G. Hea-cox, Heacox, Hartman, Koshmrl, Cosgriff & Johnson, P.A., St. Paul, MN, for relators (A09-1594).

Opinion:
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed July 30, 2009, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that "[sjummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view," doing no more than establishing the law of the case).
BY THE COURT:
/a/ G. Barry Anderson Associate Justice