Case Name: RSL COM U.S.A., INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Neil SOLLINGER and One Step Billing, Inc., Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-12-21
Citations: 23 F. App'x 81
Docket Number: No. 01-7536
Parties: RSL COM U.S.A., INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Neil SOLLINGER and One Step Billing, Inc., Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 23
Pages: 81–81

Head Matter:
RSL COM U.S.A., INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Neil SOLLINGER and One Step Billing, Inc., Defendants-Appellants.
No. 01-7536.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Dec. 21, 2001.
Peter Ticktin, Scholl, Ticktin, Boca Ra-ton, FL, for Appellants.
Andrew B. Messite, Reed Smith, N.Y., NY, for Appellee.
Present KEARSE, WINTER, and CALABRESI, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
SUMMARY ORDER
This cause came on to be heard on the record from the United -States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and was argued by counsel.
ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is now hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of said District Court be and it hereby is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Martin's Opinion and Order dated December 18, 2000, and his Opinion and Order dated April 4, 2001. The pertinent contract provision is unambiguous for the reasons stated in the December 18, 2000 Opinion and Order.
We have considered all of defendants' contentions on this appeal and have found them to be without merit. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.