Case Name: Anthony K. MACK, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2016-02-09
Citations: 482 S.W.3d 449
Docket Number: No. ED 102763
Parties: Anthony K. MACK, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before Lisa S. Van Amburg, C.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 482
Pages: 449–450

Head Matter:
Anthony K. MACK, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 102763
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
Filed: February 9, 2016
Lisa M. Stroup, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Mov-ant/Appellant.
Dora A. Fichter, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent/Respondent.
Before Lisa S. Van Amburg, C.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Anthony K. Mack appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.15. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and .the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth ,the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
, All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. 2014, unless otherwise indicated.