Case Name: In the Matter of Mark H. Maddocks, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MARK H. MADDOCKS, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2002-10-16
Citations: 184 Or. App. 390
Docket Number: MC 020001; A117221
Parties: In the Matter of Mark H. Maddocks, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MARK H. MADDOCKS, Appellant.
Judges: Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Linder and Wollheim, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 184
Pages: 390–391

Head Matter:
Submitted on record and briefs September 6,
reversed October 16, 2002
In the Matter of Mark H. Maddocks, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MARK H. MADDOCKS, Appellant.
MC 020001; A117221
56 P3d 463
Kent A. Anderson filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General, and David F. Coursen, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Linder and Wollheim, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Appellant appeals from a judgment continuing his commitment to the Mental Health Division. The state concedes that the record does not demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that appellant currently meets the criteria for "mentally ill" set forth in ORS 426.005. We agree and therefore accept the state's concession.
Reversed.