Case Name: Judy Faye Coggins RAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Matthew TSUNODA; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-08-20
Citations: 235 F. App'x 588
Docket Number: No. 05-56879
Parties: Judy Faye Coggins RAY, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Matthew TSUNODA; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before: O’SCANNLAIN, GRABER, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 235
Pages: 588–588

Head Matter:
Judy Faye Coggins RAY, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Matthew TSUNODA; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
No. 05-56879.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Aug. 20, 2007.
Judy Faye Coggins Ray, Chula Vista, CA, pro se.
Bart J. Miesfeld, Office of the City Attorney, City of Chula Vista, Chula Vista, CA, John G. Madsen, Esq., Liebman Quigley Sheppard & Soulema, San Diego, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, GRABER, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
The panel has voted to withdraw sua sponte the unpublished memorandum disposition filed April 24, 2007, 229 Fed.Appx. 507. A memorandum disposition filed concurrently with this order is filed in its place.
The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 35.
The petition for rehearing en banc is denied.