Case Name: Nancy Carol ROBERTS, individually and as the personal representative of the estate of James Arnold Roberts, deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kelly J. Reed, Steven D. Clark; Lloyd E. Hedberg and Blanche M. Hedberg, husband and wife, Defendants, and TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT, By and Through the Idaho Transportation Board, Defendant-Respondent
Court: Idaho Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Idaho
Decision Date: 1992-03-20
Citations: 121 Idaho 723
Docket Number: No. 19705
Parties: Nancy Carol ROBERTS, individually and as the personal representative of the estate of James Arnold Roberts, deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kelly J. Reed, Steven D. Clark; Lloyd E. Hedberg and Blanche M. Hedberg, husband and wife, Defendants, and TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT, By and Through the Idaho Transportation Board, Defendant-Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Idaho Reports
Volume: 121
Pages: 723–723

Head Matter:
827 P.2d 1174
Nancy Carol ROBERTS, individually and as the personal representative of the estate of James Arnold Roberts, deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kelly J. Reed, Steven D. Clark; Lloyd E. Hedberg and Blanche M. Hedberg, husband and wife, Defendants, and TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT, By and Through the Idaho Transportation Board, Defendant-Respondent.
No. 19705.
Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, Feb. 1992 Term.
March 20, 1992.
Imhoff & Lynch, Boise, for plaintiff-appellant. Patrick D. Furey argued, Boise.
Hon. Larry EchoHawk, Atty. Gen., and Hall, Farley, Oberrecht & Blanton, Boise, for defendant-respondent. Donald J. Farley argued, Boise.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Nancy Carol Roberts appealed the trial court's summary judgment dismissing her claims for personal injuries and for the wrongful death of her husband. We assigned the case to the Court of Appeals, which reversed and remanded. Roberts v. Transportation Department, 121 Idaho 727, 827 P.2d 1178 (Ct.App.1991). The De-' partment of Transportation requested review of the decision of the Court of Appeals, which we granted.
We have reviewed and considered the briefs, the record, the transcript, and the opinion of the Court of Appeals. We have also listened to and considered the oral arguments presented to us. Based on this review and consideration, we concur with the decision of the Court of Appeals.
We award costs, but not attorney fees, to appellant on review.