Case Name: John FELSO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2004-06-23
Citations: 875 So. 2d 786
Docket Number: No. 3D01-3210
Parties: John FELSO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before LEVY, GODERICH, and WELLS, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 875
Pages: 786–787

Head Matter:
John FELSO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D01-3210.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
June 23, 2004.
Weiner & Ratzan and Jeffrey S. Weiner and Mycki Ratzan, Miami, for appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Consuelo Maingot (Ft. Lauderdale), Assistant Attorney General and Melissa Vaughan Rubin, Certified out-of-state practioner, for appellee.
Before LEVY, GODERICH, and WELLS, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant raises two issues on appeal. We affirm the trial court as to both. As to the first issue, concerning the question of the claim of newly discovered evidence, our affirmance is without prejudice to the appellant to file any motion that might be appropriate under Rule 3.850 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure.
In view of the fact that we find that appellant's second point lacks merit, we do not further address it herein.