Case Name: Salvador CAMPOS, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-12-28
Citations: 262 F. App'x 69
Docket Number: No. 06-71509
Parties: Salvador CAMPOS, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 262
Pages: 69–70

Head Matter:
Salvador CAMPOS, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 06-71509.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 20, 2007.
Filed Dec. 28, 2007.
M. Yehlen Brooks, Esq., Stockton, CA, for Petitioner.
Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Emily A. Radford, Esq., Melissa Leibman, Esq., DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Salvador Campos, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order dismissing Campos' appeal from an Immigration Judge's decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review Campos' ineffective assistance of counsel claim because he failed to raise it before the BIA and thereby failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004) (explaining that this court lacks jurisdiction to review contentions not raised before the agency).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.