Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. David A. CONRAD, Appellant; David A. CONRAD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1997-03-18
Citations: 941 S.W.2d 766
Docket Number: No. 68421
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. David A. CONRAD, Appellant. David A. CONRAD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 941
Pages: 766–766

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. David A. CONRAD, Appellant. David A. CONRAD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 68421.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
March 18, 1997.
David L. Simpson, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Lisa A. Fischer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, David A. Conrad, appeals the judgment of conviction for two counts of sodomy, RSMo § 566.060 (1994), entered by the Circuit Court of Lewis County after a jury trial. Appellant also appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment of conviction is supported by sufficient evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. We further find the judgment denying the Rule 29.15 motion is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).