Case Name: Robert LEE, Sr., Appellant v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1986-08-11
Citations: 492 So. 2d 470
Docket Number: No. BK-168
Parties: Robert LEE, Sr., Appellant v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: WIGGINTON, and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 492
Pages: 470–470

Head Matter:
Robert LEE, Sr., Appellant v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. BK-168.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Aug. 11, 1986.
Michael E. Allen, Public Defender, and Kenneth L. Hosford, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Kurt L. Barch, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a conviction and sentence for burglary of a conveyance and theft of a firearm. Appellant's attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), representing to the Court that, in his professional judgment, no reversible error appears and that he cannot in good conscience present an argument in support of the defendant's appeal. Accordingly, appellant was permitted to file a pro se brief in which he asserts that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict. We disagree and find the evidence sufficient. From our review of the record, we can discern no other arguable issue.
AFFIRMED.
WIGGINTON, and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.
MILLS, J., dissents with written opinion.