Case Name: In the Matter of the Marriage of CROSS, Appellant, and CROSS, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1986-04-02
Citations: 78 Or. App. 315
Docket Number: 79-3-134; CA A34376
Parties: In the Matter of the Marriage of CROSS, Appellant, and CROSS, Respondent.
Judges: Before Gillette, Presiding Judge Pro Tempore, Joseph, Chief Judge, and Van Hoomissen, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 78
Pages: 315–316

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted October 7, 1985,
decree modified, remanded for further proceedings April 2,
reconsideration denied May 23,
petition for review denied June 17, 1986 (301 Or 240)
In the Matter of the Marriage of CROSS, Appellant, and CROSS, Respondent.
(79-3-134; CA A34376)
715 P2d 1129
Ronald I. Gevurtz, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Gevurtz & Menashe, Robert K. Udziela and Pozzi, Wilson, Atchison, O’Leary & Conboy, Portland.
Nancy Tauman, Oregon City, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief was Hibbard, Caldwell, Bowerman, Schultz & Hergert, Oregon City.
Before Gillette, Presiding Judge Pro Tempore, Joseph, Chief Judge, and Van Hoomissen, Judge.
PER CURIAM
Van Hoomissen, J., dissenting.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
On de novo review, we determine that the best interests of the children dictate that they be placed in permanent custody of the father. The trial court's decree is modified accordingly. The matter is remanded for determination of visitation and support, if any.
Decree modified; custody of children awarded to father; remanded for further proceedings. Costs to appellant.