Case Name: New York Bank Note Co., App'lt, v. Hamilton Bank-Note Engraving & Printing Co., Resp't
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1894-10-12
Citations: 63 N.Y. St. Rep. 873
Docket Number: 
Parties: New York Bank Note Co., App’lt, v. Hamilton Bank-Note Engraving & Printing Co., Resp’t.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 63
Pages: 873–873

Head Matter:
New York Bank Note Co., App’lt, v. Hamilton Bank-Note Engraving & Printing Co., Resp’t.
(Supreme Court,_ General Term, First Department,
October 12, 1894.)

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Without considering the merits of this action, we think that the special term was right in deferring the relief sought until after the questions at issue could be disposed of upon the merits at the trial. The order appealed from is affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.