Case Name: Lonnie SNELLING, Appellant, v. Willie C. HEMPHILL, Jr., et al., Respondents.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2019-02-26
Citations: 568 S.W.3d 558
Docket Number: ED 106817
Parties: Lonnie SNELLING, Appellant,
v.
Willie C. HEMPHILL, Jr., et al., Respondents.
Judges: Before: Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Colleen Dolan, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 568
Pages: 558–559

Head Matter:
Lonnie SNELLING, Appellant,
v.
Willie C. HEMPHILL, Jr., et al., Respondents.
ED 106817
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
Filed: February 26, 2019
Lonnie Snelling, Pro Se, 1518 79th Street, St. Louis, MO 63130, for appellant.
Ellsworth D. Ware III, 4144 Lindell Blvd., Suite 126, St. Louis, MO 63108, for respondent.
Before: Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Colleen Dolan, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Lonnie Snelling appeals the denial of his motion to amend or to enter a nunc pro tunc judgment for an order reviving a judgment. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).