Case Name: Michael BOLEN, Respondent, v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2015-06-23
Citations: 473 S.W.3d 152
Docket Number: No. ED 101342
Parties: Michael BOLEN, Respondent, v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant.
Judges: Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 473
Pages: 152–152

Head Matter:
Michael BOLEN, Respondent, v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant.
No. ED 101342
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
FILED: June 23, 2015
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied August 13, 2015
Application for Transfer Denied October 27, 2015
Booker T. Shaw, David Allen Dick, Co-Counsel, Thomas Everett Jones, Co-Counsel, Thompson Coburn, One US Bank Plaza, St. Louis, MO 63101, Attorney for Appellant.
Nelson Gregory Wolff, Jacob Charles Murov, Michael Armin Wolff, Jerome J. Schlichter — all Co-Counsel, Schlicter, Bo-gard & Denton, 100 S. 4th Street, Suite 900, St. Louis, MO 63102, Attorney for Respondent.
Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
BNSF Railway Company appeals from the trial court's judgment after a jury entered a unanimous verdict in favor of Michael Bolen on his petition filed under the Federal Employers' Liability Act. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).