Case Name: CANFIELD et al. v. BELL et al.
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1915-06-15
Citations: 47 Okla. 622
Docket Number: No. 4841
Parties: CANFIELD et al. v. BELL et al.
Judges: All the Justices concur.
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 47
Pages: 622–623

Head Matter:
CANFIELD et al. v. BELL et al.
No. 4841.
Opinion Filed June 15, 1915.
(149 Pac. 1088.)
- APPEAL AND ERKÜK — 'Case-Matte—Failure ío File and Certify— Dismissal. Where the purported case-made was not filed in the oiiit-e of the clerk of the court in which the trial was had, and same is not properly certified as a transcript of the record, the appeal will he dismissed.
(Syllabus by the Court.)
Error from County Court, Pawnee County; Fred S. Liscum, Judge.
Action between H. C. Canfield and others and James Bell and others. From the judgment the parties first mentioned bring error.
Dismissed.
McNeill & McNeill, for plaintiffs in error.
Redmond S. Cole, for defendants in error.

Opinion:
HARDY, J.
This case comes on upon motion to dismiss appeal, because: (1) The case-made was not filed in the court below; (2) the certificate of the judge who tried the case was never attested by the clerk of the county court; and (3) the certificate of the alleged case-made does not affirmatively show that it contains a full, true, and correct transcript of the record in said cause.
It does not appear that the case-made was ever filed in the office of the clerk of the trial court, as required by section 5242, Rev. Laws 1910, and, in the absence of a request for leave to withdraw case-made and file same as required by said statute, it will be stricken from the files of this court; and, not being properly certified as a transcript, the petition in error is dismissed. Abbott .v Rogers, 35 Okla. 189, 128 Pac. 908; Peck v. Stephens, 35 Okla. 468, 130 Pac. 276; Montemat v. Johnson, 42 Okla. 443, 141 Pac. 779.
All the Justices concur.