Case Name: Steven Martell COLLINS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Bertram RICE; Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-07-07
Citations: 451 F.3d 1092
Docket Number: No. 01-56958
Parties: Steven Martell COLLINS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Bertram RICE; Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: Before CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, SIDNEY R. THOMAS, and RICHARD A. PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 451
Pages: 1092–1092

Head Matter:
Steven Martell COLLINS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Bertram RICE; Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 01-56958.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Filed July 7, 2006.
Steven Martell Collins, Blythe, CA, pro se.
Karyn H. Bucur, Attorney at Law, La-guna Hills, CA, Erika Denice Jackson, Esq., AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondents-Appellees.
Before CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, SIDNEY R. THOMAS, and RICHARD A. PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
Pursuant to the opinion of the Supreme Court in Rice v. Collins, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 969, 163 L.Ed.2d 824 (2006), the judgment of the district court is affirmed. The mandate shall issue forthwith.