Case Name: F. M. Whaley v. The State
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1924-05-28
Citations: 98 Tex. Crim. 131
Docket Number: No. 8453
Parties: F. M. Whaley v. The State.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Criminal Reports
Volume: 98
Pages: 131–132

Head Matter:
F. M. Whaley v. The State.
No. 8453.
Decided May 28, 1924.
Rehearing denied June 27, 1924.
1. —Swindling—Practice on Appeal — Statement of Facts.
In the absence of a statement of facts and bills of exception nothing is present case, the motion for rehearing must be overruled.
2. —Same—Rehearing—Information—Arrest of Judgment.
Where the information was in approved form, and the authorities cited by appellant that the information is insufficient have no application to the present case, the motion for rehearing must be overruled.
Appeal from the County Court of Tarrant. Tried below before the Honorable P. W. Seward.
Appeal from a conviction of misdemeanor swindling; penalty, a fine of $25.00 and five days confinement in the county jail.
The opinion states the case.
Alexander & Baldwin, for appellant.
— On question of insufficiency of information: Moore v. State, 197 S. W. Rep., 728; Farmer v. State, 213 id., 669; Luce v. State, 224 id., 1095; Mathews v. State, 48 id., 189; McGinty v. State, 245 id., 924; Osborne v. State, 245 id., 928; Pospishel v. State, 255 S. W. Rep., 738.
Tom Garrard, Attorney for the State and Grover G. Morris, Assistant Attorney for the State.

Opinion:
HAWKINS, Judge.
— Conviction is for misdemeanor swindling with punishment assessed at a fine of $25 and five days confinement in the county jail.
The record contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exception. In such condition nothing is presented for review.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.