Case Name: Thelma H. COOPER, Appellant, v. Arthur L. PERPER, Appellee
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1956-07-11
Citations: 88 So. 2d 615
Docket Number: 
Parties: Thelma H. COOPER, Appellant, v. Arthur L. PERPER, Appellee.
Judges: TERRELL, Acting Chief Justice, and ROBERTS, THORNAL and O’CON-NELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 88
Pages: 615–616

Head Matter:
Thelma H. COOPER, Appellant, v. Arthur L. PERPER, Appellee.
Supreme Court of Florida, Special Division B.
July 11, 1956.
Rosenhouse & Rosenhouse, Miami, for appellant.
Wicker & Smith, Miami, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to Rule 38 of the rules of this court, 31 F.S.A., and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;
It is accordingly Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the motion to affirm the judg ment appealed from be, and the same is hereby granted, and the judgment is
Affirmed.
TERRELL, Acting Chief Justice, and ROBERTS, THORNAL and O'CON-NELL, JJ., concur.