Case Name: Charles SIDOTE, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1926-12-07
Citations: 15 F.2d 1019
Docket Number: No. 4676
Parties: Charles SIDOTE, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 15
Pages: 1019–1019

Head Matter:
Charles SIDOTE, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
December 7, 1926.)
No. 4676.
Henry A. Pollack, of Cleveland, Ohio (Mooney, McCormack, Roth & Pollack, of Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for plaintiff in error.
Mr. John B. Osmun, Asst. U. S. A.tty., of Cleveland, Ohio (A. E. Bemsteen, of Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for the United States.
Before DENISON and MOORMAN, Circuit Judges, and HOUGH, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. The counts for possession and sale were supported by substantial evidence; and the single sentence was permissible under these counts without reference to the nuisance count.