Case Name: CTIA-THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA; Christine Daniel, City Manager of Berkeley, California, in her official capacity, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-10-11
Citations: 873 F.3d 774
Docket Number: No. 16-15141
Parties: CTIA-THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA; Christine Daniel, City Manager of Berkeley, California, in her official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, MORGAN B. CHRISTEN, and MICHELLE T. FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 873
Pages: 774–777

Head Matter:
CTIA-THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA; Christine Daniel, City Manager of Berkeley, California, in her official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-15141
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Filed October 11, 2017
D.C. No. 3:15-cv-02529-EMC
Theodore B. Olson (argued), Helgi C. Walker, Jacob T. Spencer, and Samantha A, Daniels, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Washington, D.C.; Joshua S, Lipshutz and Joshua D. Dick, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP, San Francisco, California; for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Lester Lawrence" Lessig, III (argued), Cambridge, Massachusetts; Amanda Sha-nor, New Haven, Connecticut; Savith Iyen-gar, - Deputy City Attorney; Zach Cowan, City - Attorney; Berkeley City Attorney’s Office, Berkeley, California; for. Defendants-Appellants.
Robert Corn-Revere and Ronald G. London, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, Washington, D.C., for Amicus1 Curiae The Association of National Advertisers, Inc.
Claire Woods and Michael E. Wall, San Francisco, California; as and for Amicus Curiae Natural Resources Defense Council.
Pratik A. Shah, James E. Tysse, and Raymond P. Tolentino, Akin Gump Strauss-Hauer & Feld LLP, Washington, D.C.; Kathryn Comerford Todd and Warren Postman, U.S. Chamber Litigation Center Inc., Washington, D.C.; for Amicus Curiae Chamber of Commerce of the United' States.
Richard P. Bress, Melissa Arbus Sherry, Michael E. Bérn, and George C. Chipev, Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, D.C.; James K. Lynch and Marcy C. Prie-deman, Latham & Watkins LLP, San Francisco, California; for Amicus Curiae American Beverage Association.
Before: WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, MORGAN B. CHRISTEN, and MICHELLE T. FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Concurrence by Judges W. Fletcher and Christen;
Dissent by
Judge Wardlaw
ORDER
Judge W. Fletcher and Judge Christen' have voted to deny the Appellant's petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc, filed May 5, 2017. Judge Friedland voted to grant both.
A judge of the court called for a vote on the petition for rehearing en banc. A vote was taken, and a majority of the' noh-recused active judges of the court failed to vote for en banc rehearing. Fed. R. App. P. 35(f).
The petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc, filed May 5, 2017, are DENIED.