Case Name: Harry Heizman et al., Appellants, v. Long Island Lighting Company et al., Defendants, and Philip F. Lindner et al., Doing Business as North East Communications Contracting, et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1998-12-17
Citations: 92 N.Y.2d 1012
Docket Number: 
Parties: Harry Heizman et al., Appellants, v Long Island Lighting Company et al., Defendants, and Philip F. Lindner et al., Doing Business as North East Communications Contracting, et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 92
Pages: 1012–1013

Head Matter:
Harry Heizman et al., Appellants, v Long Island Lighting Company et al., Defendants, and Philip F. Lindner et al., Doing Business as North East Communications Contracting, et al., Respondents.
Submitted October 19, 1998;
decided December 17, 1998

Opinion:
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order denying the motion for reargument or, in the alternative, leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, dismissed upon the ground that the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.