Case Name: In the Matter of the Claim of Charlotte Bogold, Respondent, against Bogold Brothers, Inc., et al., Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1927-05-20
Citations: 245 N.Y. 574
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Claim of Charlotte Bogold, Respondent, against Bogold Brothers, Inc., et al., Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 245
Pages: 574–575

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Claim of Charlotte Bogold, Respondent, against Bogold Brothers, Inc., et al., Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent.
(Argued May 9, 1927;
decided May 20, 1927.)
William E. Lyons, Barnett Cohen and Frank J. O’ Neill for appellants.
Philip A. Sullivan for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The Appellate Division has remitted the claim to the State Industrial Board merely to reinstate the award to respondent in accordance with the opinions of the Appellate Division. No further hearing is contemplated. Appellant on the argument stipulates for such award in case of affirmance. The order may be regarded as a final order or an order for anew trial with stipulation for judgment absolute and subject to review in this court.
The order should be affirmed, with costs.
Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrews, Lehman and O'Brien, JJ., concur; Kellogg, J., not sitting.
Order affirmed, etc.