Case Name: The State, Plaintiff, vs. Groh, Defendant
Court: Wisconsin Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Wisconsin
Decision Date: 1926-03-09
Citations: 189 Wis. 440
Docket Number: 
Parties: The State, Plaintiff, vs. Groh, Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Wisconsin Reports
Volume: 189
Pages: 440–441

Head Matter:
The State, Plaintiff, vs. Groh, Defendant.
February 13
March 9, 1926.
For the plaintiff there was a brief by the Attorney General, Eugene Wengert, district attorney of Milwaukee county, George A. Bozvman, special assistant district attorney, and C. Stanley Perry, assistant district attorney; and the cause was argued orally by Mr. Bozvman and Mr. Perry.

Opinion:
Stevens, J.
The questions here presented were considered and determined in Degutes v. State, ante, p. 435, 207 N. W. 948.
yBy the Court. — The first question certified is answered that sentence should be imposed under sec. 343.182 of the Statutes.
The second question is answered Yes.