Case Name: STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Miguel Angel Rodriguez DE LA CRUZ, Defendant and Appellant
Court: North Dakota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: North Dakota
Decision Date: 2017-12-07
Citations: 904 N.W.2d 478
Docket Number: No. 20170207
Parties: STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Miguel Angel Rodriguez DE LA CRUZ, Defendant and Appellant
Judges: [¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C. J.
Reporter: North Western Reporter 2d
Volume: 904
Pages: 478–479

Head Matter:
2017 ND 276
STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Miguel Angel Rodriguez DE LA CRUZ, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20170207
Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Filed 12/7/2017
Leah J. Viste, Assistant State’s Attorney, Fargo, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on. brief.
Nicholas D. Thornton and James A. Teigland, Fargo, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
[¶ 1] Miguel Ángel Rodriguez. De La Cruz appealed from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of patronizing a minor for commercial sexual activity. On appeal,- De La Cruz argues the guilty verdict is not supported by sufficient evidence. We conclude the State presented sufficient evidence and summarily affirm the criminal judgment under N.D.R.App,P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C. J.
Jon J. Jensen
Jérod E. Tufte
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers