Case Name: PETER R. ROSTAIN, Respondent, v. PHIL C. KATZ, as Administrator with the Will Annexed, etc., et al., Defendants; ALEXANDER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (a Corporation), Appellant
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1944-02-29
Citations: 63 Cal. App. 2d 839
Docket Number: Civ. No. 3112
Parties: PETER R. ROSTAIN, Respondent, v. PHIL C. KATZ, as Administrator with the Will Annexed, etc., et al., Defendants; ALEXANDER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (a Corporation), Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports, Second Series
Volume: 63
Pages: 839–839

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 3112.
Fourth Dist.
Feb. 29, 1944.]
PETER R. ROSTAIN, Respondent, v. PHIL C. KATZ, as Administrator with the Will Annexed, etc., et al., Defendants; ALEXANDER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (a Corporation), Appellant.
Earle P. Thompson for Appellant.
H. E. Schmidt for Respondent.

Opinion:
BARNARD, P. J.
This is an action to quiet title. The material facts are precisely similar to those in the case of Rostain v. Guggenheim, this day decided, ante, p. 127 [146 P.2d 247] and the issues and questions raised are exactly the same. For the reasons stated in the decision in that case the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Marks, J., and Griffin, J., concurred.