Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lamatavous Regtez COLLINS, a/k/a Red, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-08-27
Citations: 538 F. App'x 340
Docket Number: No. 13-7049
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lamatavous Regtez COLLINS, a/k/a Red, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 538
Pages: 340–340

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lamatavous Regtez COLLINS, a/k/a Red, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-7049.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 22, 2013.
Decided: Aug. 27, 2013.
Lamatavous Regtez Collins, Appellant Pro Se. Stanley D. Ragsdale, John David Rowell, Assistant United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Lamatavous Regtez Collins appeals the district court's order denying his second motion for a new trial and denying his motion for the return of forfeited property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we deny leave to proceed under the Criminal Justice Act, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Collins, No. 1:10-cr-00466-MBS-3 (D.S.C. June 24, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.