Case Name: S.D., Appellant, v. C.A.T., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2004-02-20
Citations: 866 So. 2d 188
Docket Number: No. 2D03-302
Parties: S.D., Appellant, v. C.A.T., Appellee.
Judges: WHATLEY, KELLY, and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 866
Pages: 188–188

Head Matter:
S.D., Appellant, v. C.A.T., Appellee.
No. 2D03-302.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Feb. 20, 2004.
Edward J. Page, Henry G. Gyden, and Robert E. Biasotti of Carlton Fields, St. Petersburg, for Appellant.
Alexander Caballero, Tampa, and Ingrid Anderson, Clearwater, of Sessums, Mason & Black, P.A., for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
All issues raised by S.D. are either without merit or subject to the law of the case doctrine. See S.D. v. C.A.T., 761 So.2d 1242 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). Accordingly, the only issue on remand is the determination of the amount of child support.
Affirmed.
WHATLEY, KELLY, and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.