Case Name: Lamark FRANKLIN, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2008-01-29
Citations: 244 S.W.3d 769
Docket Number: No. ED 89289
Parties: Lamark FRANKLIN, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., BOOKER T. SHAW, J., and KURT S. ODENWALD, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 244
Pages: 769–770

Head Matter:
Lamark FRANKLIN, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 89289.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Jan. 29, 2008.
Timothy Forneris, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Shaun Mackelprang, Lisa M. Kennedy, co-counsel, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., BOOKER T. SHAW, J., and KURT S. ODENWALD, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant Lamark Franklin appeals from the motion court's judgment denying, after a hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion for post conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude that the trial court did not clearly err. Rule 29.15(k). No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).