Case Name: Joseph A. Napoletan et al., Appellants, v. State of New York, Respondent; Donald J. Keeler et al., Appellants, v. State of New York, Respondent; Marcus J. Youmans, as Administrator with the Will Annexed of Conrad C. Mesick, Deceased, et al., Appellants, v. State of New York, Respondent; Marcus J. Youmans, as Administrator with the Will Annexed of Conrad C. Mesick, Deceased, et al., Appellants, v. State of New York, Respondent; Marcus J. Youmans, as Administrator with the Will Annexed of Conrad C. Mesick, Deceased, et al., Appellants, v. State of New York, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1955-07-08
Citations: 309 N.Y. 656
Docket Number: Claim No. 30732; Claim No. 30836; Claim No. 30792; Claim No. 30791; Claim No. 30837
Parties: Joseph A. Napoletan et al., Appellants, v. State of New York, Respondent. Donald J. Keeler et al., Appellants, v. State of New York, Respondent. Marcus J. Youmans, as Administrator with the Will Annexed of Conrad C. Mesick, Deceased, et al., Appellants, v. State of New York, Respondent. Marcus J. Youmans, as Administrator with the Will Annexed of Conrad C. Mesick, Deceased, et al., Appellants, v. State of New York, Respondent. Marcus J. Youmans, as Administrator with the Will Annexed of Conrad C. Mesick, Deceased, et al., Appellants, v. State of New York, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 309
Pages: 656–657

Head Matter:
Joseph A. Napoletan et al., Appellants, v. State of New York, Respondent. Donald J. Keeler et al., Appellants, v. State of New York, Respondent. Marcus J. Youmans, as Administrator with the Will Annexed of Conrad C. Mesick, Deceased, et al., Appellants, v. State of New York, Respondent. Marcus J. Youmans, as Administrator with the Will Annexed of Conrad C. Mesick, Deceased, et al., Appellants, v. State of New York, Respondent. Marcus J. Youmans, as Administrator with the Will Annexed of Conrad C. Mesick, Deceased, et al., Appellants, v. State of New York, Respondent.
(Claim No. 30732.)
(Claim No. 30836.)
(Claim No. 30792.)
(Claim No. 30791.)
(Claim No. 30837.)
Argued April 14, 1955;
decided July 8, 1955.
Richmond D. Moot for appellants.
Jacob K. Javits, Attorney-General {Henry 8. Manley and Richard H. Shepp of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
In each claim, the appeal from the judgment — which constitutes the appealable paper — dismissed, with costs, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is presented. No opinion.
Concur: Conway, Ch. J., Desmond, Dye, Fuld, Fboessel, Van Voobhis and Bubke, JJ.