Case Name: LETO, Respondent, v. SMITH, Appellant (two cases)
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1899-10-25
Citations: 60 N.Y.S. 1142
Docket Number: 
Parties: LETO, Respondent, v. SMITH, Appellant (two cases).
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 60
Pages: 1142–1142

Head Matter:
LETO, Respondent, v. SMITH, Appellant (two cases).
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
October 25, 1899.)
Actions by August L. Leto and Celestine Leto, respectively, against William R. Smith. There was a judgment ior plaintiff in each action, and defendant appeals.
Reversed.
James R. Bowen, for appellant.
Charles F. Bliss, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The record failing to show that the defendant resides within the jurisdiction of the municipal court, the judgment must be reversed. Tyroler v. Gummersbach, 28 Misc. Rep. 151, 59 N. Y. Supp. 266, 319. Judgment reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs in each case to the appellant to abide the event.