Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Nanette Sue LITHERLAND, Appellant.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2018-02-20
Citations: 541 S.W.3d 13
Docket Number: No. ED 105130
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent,
v.
Nanette Sue LITHERLAND, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 541
Pages: 13–13

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent,
v.
Nanette Sue LITHERLAND, Appellant.
No. ED 105130
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Filed: February 20, 2018
Ellen H. Flottman, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J. and Sherri B. Sullivan and Kurt S. Odenwald, JJ.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Nannette Litherland appeals from the judgment entered on her conviction following a jury trial for first-degree murder and first-degree assault. Finding no reasonable probability that the jury would have reached a different conclusion but for the challenged testimony, we affirm.
An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).