Case Name: Akzo Salt, Inc., Appellant, v. Admr., Ohio Bureau of Employment Services, Appellee
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1996-07-03
Citations: 75 Ohio St. 3d 1223
Docket Number: No. 95-1253
Parties: Akzo Salt, Inc., Appellant, v. Admr., Ohio Bureau of Employment Services, Appellee.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Stratton, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 75
Pages: 1223–1223

Head Matter:
Akzo Salt, Inc., Appellant, v. Admr., Ohio Bureau of Employment Services, Appellee.
[Cite as Akzo Salt, Inc. v. Ohio Bur. of Emp. Serv. (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 1223.]
(No. 95-1253
Submitted May 22, 1996
Decided July 3, 1996.)
Willacy & LoPresti, Timothy A. Marcovy, Aubrey B. Willacy and M. Scott Young, for appellant.
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, Betsey Nims Friedman and Frank J. Reed, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

Opinion:
The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Stratton, JJ., concur.
Cook, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.