Case Name: UNION TRUST CO OF DAYTON et v. REPINE
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1934-11-23
Citations: 18 Ohio Law Abs. 206
Docket Number: No 1254
Parties: UNION TRUST CO OF DAYTON et v REPINE
Judges: 
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 18
Pages: 206–207

Head Matter:
UNION TRUST CO OF DAYTON et v REPINE
Ohio Appeals, 2nd Dist, Montgomery Co
No 1254.
Decided Nov 23, 1934
John W. Bricker, Attorney General, Columbus, By Special Counsel H. A. Estabrook, Dayton, and Sidney G.- Kusworm, Dayton, for plaintiffs in error.
Horace J. Boesch, Dayton, and Robert' C. Boesch, Dayton, for defendants in error.

Opinion:
OPINION
By THE COURT
Judgment entry is submitted in this cause without the allowance of interest on the principal sum of the judgment. It is insisted by counsel that the defendant in error is entitled to an additional allowance of interest. Inasmuch as this claim is predicated upon a finding of an amount due from a guardian to its ward, it comes within the provisions of §10933 and 10506-46 GC, and is a claim upon which the Probate Court would, in all probability, charge interest.
We are, therefore, of opinion that in terest should be included, in the judgment entry in this cause and have so provided in the entry which was tendered to the court.