Case Name: Elton WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Eric D. WILSON, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-10-21
Citations: 543 F. App'x 307
Docket Number: No. 13-6995
Parties: Elton WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Eric D. WILSON, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before AGEE, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 543
Pages: 307–308

Head Matter:
Elton WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Eric D. WILSON, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 13-6995.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 17, 2013.
Decided: Oct. 21, 2013.
Elton Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Lynn Watt, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia; Michael Alan Rot-ker, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Appellee.
Before AGEE, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Elton Williams, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Williams' 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2013) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in for-ma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Wilson, No. 2:11-cv-00488-RBS-LRL (E.D.Va. filed May 6, 2013; entered May 7, 2013). We further deny Williams' motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.