Case Name: McDONALD v. DOOLEY et al.
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1936-09-29
Citations: 177 Okla. 507
Docket Number: No. 25902
Parties: McDONALD v. DOOLEY et al.
Judges: McNEILL, C. X, OSBORN, V. O. X, and BAYLESS, CORN, and GIBSON, XT., concur.
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 177
Pages: 507–508

Head Matter:
McDONALD v. DOOLEY et al.
No. 25902.
Sept. 29, 1936.
Stanley B. Catlett, for plaintiff in error.
Monnet & Savage, for defendants in error.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This cause was tried and a judgment rendered for the defendants, denying the application of the plaintiff for a new trial. The plaintiff prosecuted an appeal and filed his petition in error on September 29, 1934, and on June 29, 1935, filed his brief, whieh reasonably sustains the allegations of his petition in error.
Defendant in error has filed no brief nor offered any excuse for such failure. The cause is therefore reversed and remanded, with directions to the trial court to grant a new trial.
McNEILL, C. X, OSBORN, V. O. X, and BAYLESS, CORN, and GIBSON, XT., concur.