Case Name: Michael J. RAIMONDO, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-04-12
Citations: 652 So. 2d 1269
Docket Number: No. 93-00866
Parties: Michael J. RAIMONDO, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: BLUE and FULMER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 652
Pages: 1269–1270

Head Matter:
Michael J. RAIMONDO, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 93-00866.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
April 12, 1995.
Susan J. Silverman, Sarasota, Specially Appointed Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Susan D. Dunlevy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
THREADGILL, Acting Chief Judge.
The appellant, Michael J. Raimondo, Jr., challenges his judgment and sentence for indirect criminal contempt based on a violation of an injunction for protection issued pursuant to section 784.046, Florida Statutes (1991). Raimondo raises five points on appeal. We find merit in only one. As Raim-ondo argues, and the state concedes, the trial court erred by failing to recite, either orally or in writing, the facts constituting the contempt as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.840(f). See Bryant v. State, 637 So.2d 339 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). We therefore reverse the judgment and remand for entry of a corrected judgment. In all other respects, we affirm.
BLUE and FULMER, JJ., concur.