Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Hugo DIAZ-BARAJAS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-06-16
Citations: 68 F. App'x 46
Docket Number: No. 01-10203; D.C. No. CR-00-01503-FRZ
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Juan Hugo DIAZ-BARAJAS, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 68
Pages: 46–47

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Juan Hugo DIAZ-BARAJAS, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 01-10203.
D.C. No. CR-00-01503-FRZ.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 9, 2003.
Decided June 16, 2003.
Before RYMER, THOMAS and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Juan Hugo Diaz-Barajas appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 46-month sentence for illegal reentry of a previously deported alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Diaz-Barajas' counsel has filed a brief stating that he finds no meritorious issues for review, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Appellant has filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Our examination of the briefs and our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no arguable issues for review on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.