Case Name: TOWNSHIP OF MAHWAH, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, CROSS-RESPONDENTS, v. BERGEN COUNTY BOARD OF TAXATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, CROSS-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1983-06-20
Citations: 190 N.J. Super. 84
Docket Number: 
Parties: TOWNSHIP OF MAHWAH, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, CROSS-RESPONDENTS, v. BERGEN COUNTY BOARD OF TAXATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, CROSS-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 190
Pages: 84–85

Head Matter:
TOWNSHIP OF MAHWAH, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, CROSS-RESPONDENTS, v. BERGEN COUNTY BOARD OF TAXATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, CROSS-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued May 9, 1983
Decided June 20, 1983.
Before Judges ARD, KING and McELROY.
Brian T. Campion argued the cause on behalf of appellants (Breslin & Breslin, attorneys, E. Carter Corriston, of counsel).
Harry Haushalter, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause on behalf of respondent Bergen County Board of Taxation (Irwin I. Kilmmelman, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; James J. Ciancia, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel).
Jacob Schneider argued the cause on behalf of respondents Township of Teaneck and Werner H. Schmid (Schneider, Schneider & Balt, attorneys).
Anthony D. Andora argued the cause on behalf of respondents Boroughs of Cresskill, Closter, Fort Lee, Demarest and Little Ferry (Andora, Palmisano, DeCotiss & Harris, attorneys; John J. Langan, Jr., Jonathan N. Harris and Anthony D. Andora, on the brief).
Joseph S. DiMaria argued the cause for the Borough of Paramus, amicus curiae.
Stuart R. Koenig argued the cause for the Township of Cedar Grove, amicus curiae (Stickel & Koenig, attorneys).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Tax Court is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge Evers. 3 N.J.Tax 513 (1981). See also Newark Superior Officers Ass'n v. Newark, 187 N.J.Super. 390 (App.Div.1982).
Affirmed.