Case Name: MICHAEL SUMMERHALDER, Petitioner, v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1988-05-11
Citations: 91 Or. App. 170
Docket Number: 07-87-309; CA A45469
Parties: MICHAEL SUMMERHALDER, Petitioner, v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, Respondent.
Judges: Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Newman and Deits, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 91
Pages: 170–171

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted April 28,
fine vacated; order otherwise affirmed May 11, 1988
MICHAEL SUMMERHALDER, Petitioner, v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, Respondent.
(07-87-309; CA A45469)
753 P2d 958
Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.
Jan Londahl, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Scott McAlister, Assistant Attorney General, Salem.
Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Newman and Deits, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Petitioner seeks review of a final order of the Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary which found him guilty of a disciplinary rule and imposed a $100 fine. He argues that there is not sufficient evidence to support the finding of guilty. There is. He also contends that the fine is unlawful. It is. Watson v. OSP, 90 Or App 85, 750 P2d 1188 (1988).
Fine vacated; order otherwise affirmed.