Case Name: Adam L. PERKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOWN OF PRINCEVILLE; Princeville Police Department, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-02-07
Citations: 216 F. App'x 293
Docket Number: No. 06-1501
Parties: Adam L. PERKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOWN OF PRINCEVILLE; Princeville Police Department, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 216
Pages: 293–293

Head Matter:
Adam L. PERKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOWN OF PRINCEVILLE; Princeville Police Department, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 06-1501.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 11, 2006.
Decided: Feb. 7, 2007.
Adam L. Perkins, Appellant Pro Se. Melissa Robin Davis, Alycia Sarah Levy, Cranfill, Sumner & Hartzog, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, Norwood Pitt Blanchard, III, Cranfill, Sumner & Hartzog, LLP, Wilmington, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Adam L. Perkins appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment against Perkins on his claims of religious discrimination and failure to accommodate under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Perkins v. Town of Princeville, No. 4:04-cv-00168-H (E.D.N.C. Apr. 19, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.