Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. David Olm, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2017-08-09
Citations: 153 A.D.3d 640
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Olm, Appellant.
Judges: Mastro, J.P., Hall, Cohen and Iannacci, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 153
Pages: 640–641

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Olm, Appellant.
[57 NYS3d 411]

Opinion:
Appeals by the defendant from five judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Chin-Brandt, J., at pleas; Armstrong, J., at sentences), all rendered January 22, 2016, each convicting him of attempted burglary in the third degree (one count as to each Superior Court Information), upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.
Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.
We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on the appeals. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).
Mastro, J.P., Hall, Cohen and Iannacci, JJ., concur.