Case Name: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. HAROLD ROWE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1939-04-21
Citations: 122 N.J.L. 466
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. HAROLD ROWE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 122
Pages: 466–466

Head Matter:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. HAROLD ROWE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Submitted February 17, 1939
Decided April 21, 1939.
For the defendant in error, David T. Wilentz, attorney-general, and Alexander F. Ormsby, assistant attorney-general.
For the plaintiff in error, Thomas Brunetto.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Porter, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Hague, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.