Case Name: Russell SNELLING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1988-12-08
Citations: 534 So. 2d 902
Docket Number: No. 87-2080
Parties: Russell SNELLING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: JOANOS and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 534
Pages: 902–903

Head Matter:
Russell SNELLING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 87-2080.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Dec. 8, 1988.
Michael E. Allen, Public Defender, and Carl S. McGinnes, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Bradford L. Thomas, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

Opinion:
WIGGINTON, Judge.
We affirm. State v. Pentaude, 500 So.2d 526 (Fla.1987). Although a majority of the reasons for departure were erroneous, we are convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the trial court would have departed on the basis of Pentaude and the egregious nature of the underlying reasons for appellant's violation of probation. Albritton v. State, 476 So.2d 158 (Fla.1985).
JOANOS and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.