Case Name: Cairo D. RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a Municipality, Defendant, and Lee Zorne, individually; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-08-04
Citations: 71 F. App'x 733
Docket Number: No. 02-56774; D.C. No. CV-99-13441-ABC
Parties: Cairo D. RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a Municipality, Defendant, and Lee Zorne, individually; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before SKOPIL, FERGUSON, and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 71
Pages: 733–733

Head Matter:
Cairo D. RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a Municipality, Defendant, and Lee Zorne, individually; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
No. 02-56774. D.C. No. CV-99-13441-ABC.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 13, 2003.
Decided Aug. 4, 2003.
Before SKOPIL, FERGUSON, and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Cairo D. Rodriguez appeals from the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the City of Los Angeles, dismissing his second amended complaint alleging discrimination, violation of civil rights, racketeering, and other claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and our review is de novo. See Weiner v. San Diego County, 210 F.3d 1025, 1028 (9th Cir.2000).
For the reasons set forth in the district court's comprehensive order entered on June 25, 2002, we affirm the summary judgment.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.