Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edna Gorham BEY, a/k/a Ghyllian Bell, a/k/a Edna Gorham, a/k/a Edna Rosser-El, a/k/a Jateyah Ali, a/k/a Edna Bey, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-06-18
Citations: 529 F. App'x 313
Docket Number: No. 13-6350
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edna Gorham BEY, a/k/a Ghyllian Bell, a/k/a Edna Gorham, a/k/a Edna Rosser-El, a/k/a Jateyah Ali, a/k/a Edna Bey, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 529
Pages: 313–313

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edna Gorham BEY, a/k/a Ghyllian Bell, a/k/a Edna Gorham, a/k/a Edna Rosser-El, a/k/a Jateyah Ali, a/k/a Edna Bey, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-6350.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 13, 2013.
Decided: June 18, 2013.
Edna Gorham Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Stuart A. Berman, James Andrew Crowell, IV, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Edna Gorham Bey seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on her 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.
We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bey has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.