Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marvell Lemon TULLOS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-10-01
Citations: 249 F. App'x 653
Docket Number: No. 06-30539
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marvell Lemon TULLOS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 249
Pages: 653–654

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marvell Lemon TULLOS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-30539.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 24, 2007.
Filed Oct. 1, 2007.
Aine Ahmed, Esq., US Attorney’s Office, Spokane, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Bryan P. Whitaker, Spokane, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Marvell Lemon Tullos appeals from the 120-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(l)(A)(ii). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Tullos contends that the district court erred by determining that he did not qualify for safety-valve relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f) and U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2. We disagree, and conclude that the district court did not clearly err in determining that Tullos did not meet his burden of establishing that he had truthfully provided to the government all information and evidence he had concerning the conspiracy. See United States v. Mejia-Pimental, 477 F.3d 1100, 1105-06 (9th Cir.2007).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.