Case Name: Jimmy D. COVINGTON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Theodis BECK, Respondent-Appellee. Jimmy D. Covington, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Theodis Beck, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-09-06
Citations: 45 F. App'x 276
Docket Number: Nos. 02-6870, 02-6921
Parties: Jimmy D. COVINGTON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Theodis BECK, Respondent-Appellee. Jimmy D. Covington, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Theodis Beck, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 45
Pages: 276–277

Head Matter:
Jimmy D. COVINGTON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Theodis BECK, Respondent-Appellee. Jimmy D. Covington, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Theodis Beck, Respondent-Appellee.
Nos. 02-6870, 02-6921.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 29, 2002.
Decided Sept. 6, 2002.
Jimmy D. Covington, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Wallace-Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Ap-pellee.
Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Jimmy D. Covington seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2002). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeals on the reasoning of the district court. Covington v. Beck, No. CA-01-968-1 (M.D.N.C. filed May 20, 2002 & entered May 21, 2002; June 3, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.