Case Name: SHASTA COUNTY v. BALAKLALA CONSOL. COPPER CO.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1922-01-09
Citations: 278 F. 158
Docket Number: No. 3762
Parties: SHASTA COUNTY v. BALAKLALA CONSOL. COPPER CO.
Judges: Before GILBERT, ROSS, and HUNT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter
Volume: 278
Pages: 158–158

Head Matter:
SHASTA COUNTY v. BALAKLALA CONSOL. COPPER CO.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
January 9, 1922.
Rehearing Denied February 20, 1922.)
No. 3762.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Second Division of the Northern District of California; Frank H. Rudkin, Judge.
Suit by the Balaklala Consolidated Copper Company against Shasta County. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
Affirmed.
Jesse W. Carter, Dist. Atty., of Redding, Cal., and Morrison, Dunne & Brebeck, of San Francisco, Cal. (Edward Hohfeld, of San Francisco, Cal., of counsel), for plaintiff in error.
F. J. Solinsky, of San Francisco, Cal., W. D. Tillotson, of Redding, Cal., and C. W. Durbrow, of San Francisco, Cal., for defendant in error.
Before GILBERT, ROSS, and HUNT, Circuit Judges.
Certiorari denied 258 U. S. —, 42 Sup. Ct. 462, 463, 66 L Ed —.

Opinion:
HUNT, Circuit Judge.
Upon authority of County of Shasta v. Mountain Copper Co., Limited, 278 Fed. 155, the decree of the District Court is affirmed.
Affirmed.