Case Name: In the Matter of D. K., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. D. K., Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2014-09-04
Citations: 265 Or. App. 334
Docket Number: 134205; A156070
Parties: In the Matter of D. K., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. D. K., Appellant.
Judges: Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and DeVore, Judge, and Garrett, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 265
Pages: 334–335

Head Matter:
Submitted June 6,
reversed September 4, 2014
In the Matter of D. K., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. D. K., Appellant.
Lincoln County Circuit Court
134205; A156070
335 P3d 317
Garrett A. Richardson, and Multnomah Defenders, Inc., filed the brief for appellant.
Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General, and Rebecca M. Auten, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and DeVore, Judge, and Garrett, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her for a period not to exceed 180 days pursuant to ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that, contrary to the trial court's ruling, the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that she is a danger to herself and unable to provide for her basic needs because of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(l)(e)(A), (B). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient for involuntary commitment under either basis and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state's concession, and reverse.
Reversed.
Our disposition obviates the need to address appellant's other assignment of error.