Case Name: WALTER R. HOBLITZELL, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, AND CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. W. FRANCK HOWARD, WILLIAM C. HOBLITZELL, H. O. B. MOTORS, INC., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, JOHN E. TOOLAN AND JOSEPH J. SEAMAN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS AND CROSS-APPELLANTS
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1955-03-28
Citations: 18 N.J. 104
Docket Number: 
Parties: WALTER R. HOBLITZELL, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, AND CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. W. FRANCK HOWARD, WILLIAM C. HOBLITZELL, H. O. B. MOTORS, INC., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, JOHN E. TOOLAN AND JOSEPH J. SEAMAN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS AND CROSS-APPELLANTS.
Judges: For affirmance — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Heher, Wachenfeld, Jacobs and Brennan — 5.
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 18
Pages: 104–104

Head Matter:
WALTER R. HOBLITZELL, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, AND CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. W. FRANCK HOWARD, WILLIAM C. HOBLITZELL, H. O. B. MOTORS, INC., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, JOHN E. TOOLAN AND JOSEPH J. SEAMAN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS AND CROSS-APPELLANTS.
Argued March 21, 1955 —
Decided March 28, 1955.
Mr. George F. Hetfield argued the cause for the plaintiff-appellant, cross-respondent (Messrs. Hetfield and Het field, attorneys).
Mr. Meyer F. Ruback argued the cause for the defendants-respondents, cross-appellants, W. Franck Howard, William C. Hoblitzell, John E. Toolan and Joseph G. Seaman (Messrs. Ruback, Albach and Weisman, attorneys).
Mr. Daniel G. Kasen argued the cause for the defendant-respondent, cross-appellant, H. O. B. Motors, Inc., (Messrs. Kasen, Schnitzer and Kasen, attorneys).

Opinion:
Pee Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Ereund in the court below.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Heher, Wachenfeld, Jacobs and Brennan — 5.
For affirmance of disallowance of counsel fees to plaintiff and for reversal with instructions to enter judgment for defendants — Justices Oliphant and Burling — 2.