Case Name: John M. WILT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1976-05-25
Citations: 333 So. 2d 556
Docket Number: No. 75-1719
Parties: John M. WILT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ„ and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 333
Pages: 556–556

Head Matter:
John M. WILT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 75-1719.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 25, 1976.
Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and Gerald Hubbart, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Ira N. Loewy, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ„ and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The defendant was convicted of loitering or prowling pursuant to Fla.Stat. § 856.-021. On this appeal, it is urged that the evidence is insufficient. The requirements for a conviction under this statute have been fully discussed in State v. Ecker, Fla. 1975, 311 So.2d 104. Tested against the guidelines set out in that opinion, we hold the evidence was fully sufficient in all particulars. See also B.A.A. v. State, Fla.App. 1976, 333 So.2d 553.
Affirmed.