Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Henry Francisco Espin FERRERA, also known as Henry Francisco Espinal-Ferrera, also known as Henry Francisco Espinal Ferrara, also known as Henry Francisc Espinal-Ferrera, also known as Henry Francisco, also known as Henry Espinal Francisco, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-04-17
Citations: 469 F. App'x 404
Docket Number: No. 11-20090
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Henry Francisco Espin FERRERA, also known as Henry Francisco Espinal-Ferrera, also known as Henry Francisco Espinal Ferrara, also known as Henry Francisc Espinal-Ferrera, also known as Henry Francisco, also known as Henry Espinal Francisco, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 469
Pages: 404–404

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Henry Francisco Espin FERRERA, also known as Henry Francisco Espinal-Ferrera, also known as Henry Francisco Espinal Ferrara, also known as Henry Francisc Espinal-Ferrera, also known as Henry Francisco, also known as Henry Espinal Francisco, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-20090
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 17, 2012.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Neal Davis, III, Esq., Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Henry Francisco Espin Ferrera has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Espin Ferrera has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th CiR. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.