Case Name: James FENNER, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. PULITZER PUBLISHING COMPANY, Appellant/Cross-Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1993-11-16
Citations: 864 S.W.2d 955
Docket Number: No. 62915
Parties: James FENNER, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. PULITZER PUBLISHING COMPANY, Appellant/Cross-Respondent.
Judges: Before CARL R. GAERTNER, P.J., and CRANE and CRAHAN, JJ. '
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 864
Pages: 955–956

Head Matter:
James FENNER, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. PULITZER PUBLISHING COMPANY, Appellant/Cross-Respondent.
No. 62915.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Nov. 16, 1993.
David S. Ware, St. Louis, for appellant.
John J. Larsen, Jr., St. Louis, for respondent.
J. Patrick Chassaing, Keith K. Cheung, St. Louis, for Treasurer of Mo. as custodian of the Second Injury Fund.
Before CARL R. GAERTNER, P.J., and CRANE and CRAHAN, JJ. '

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
These appeals arise out of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's award in a worker's compensation claim. Both the claimant, James Fenner, and the employer, Pulitzer Publishing Company, appeal from the Commission's award. These appeals were consolidated into this action. We affirm the Commission's award.
An opinion reciting detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no prec-edential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only. This memorandum sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed according to Rule 84.16(b).