Case Name: Phu TRAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-02-17
Citations: 965 S.W.2d 300
Docket Number: No. 71725
Parties: Phu TRAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GRIMM, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 965
Pages: 300–300

Head Matter:
Phu TRAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 71725.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Feb. 17, 1998.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 20, 1998.
Application for Transfer Denied May 26, 1998.
Dave Hemingway, Asst. Sp. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Meghan J. Stephens, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before GRIMM, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Phu Tran, Movant, appeals from the judgment entered denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal and find the motion court's judgment is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).