Case Name: W.T., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2018-10-03
Citations: 255 So. 3d 509
Docket Number: No. 3D17-904
Parties: W.T., a juvenile, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and SALTER and LOGUE, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 255
Pages: 509–510

Head Matter:
W.T., a juvenile, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D17-904
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Opinion filed October 3, 2018
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Natasha Baker-Bradley, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Kayla H. McNab, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and SALTER and LOGUE, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The officer had reasonable suspicion to stop Appellant and the other two juveniles given the be-on-the-look-out transmission, the juveniles' geographic and temporal proximity to the armed robbery, the match between the suspects' reported descriptions and the juveniles' appearances, and the juveniles' behavior when approached; and, once the firearm was discovered, the officer had probable cause to arrest. Therefore, the officer was engaged in the execution of a legal duty when Appellant knocked him to the ground in an apparent attempt to escape. W.T.'s convictions are affirmed. See § 776.051, 784.07, 843.01, Fla. Stat.; Sosnowski v. State, 245 So.3d 885 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018) ; State v. Roy, 944 So.2d 403 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).
Affirmed.