Case Name: In re OLDS et al.
Court: United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1870-08-31
Citations: 18 F. Cas. 644
Docket Number: 
Parties: In re OLDS et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Cases
Volume: 18
Pages: 644–644

Head Matter:
Case No. 10,484.
In re OLDS et al.
[4 N. B. R. 146; (Quarto 37).]
District Court, W. D. Michigan.
Aug. 31, 1870.
Bankruptcy — Costs—Payment by Assignee.
Where bankrupts (involuntary) complied with all the requirements of the bankrupt law |of 1867 (14 Stat. 517)], filed a petition for their discharge, there being funds in the hands of the assignee, and the final dividend not having been declared, the following question arose: “Whether the costs incurred upon the petition of bankrupts for their discharge, the hearing on said petition, publication of notice of hearing, etc., shall be paid out of the funds in the assignee’s hands belonging to the estate of said bankrupts, or by the bankrupts themselves.” — held, the as-signee, when he has funds, should pay the costs.
[Cited in Re Elmendorf, 9 Fed. 546.]
[In the matter of M. Olds, W. Olds, and L. Olds, involuntary bankrupts.]
At Kalamazoo, in said district, on the 31st day of August, A. D. 1870.
Before J. DAVIDSON BURNS, Register in Bankruptcy:
I, (he above-named register, do hereby certify that, in the course of the proceedings in said cause before me, the said bankrupts [M. Olds, W. Olds, and L. Olds] have filed a petition for their discharge; a hearing has been had thereon, no opposition has been made by any creditor to the granting of discharge; two of the bankrupts have taken the oath required by section 29 of the bankrupt act, and I have made certificate of conformity, and report in favor of their discharge. This is involuntary case, and there are funds in the hands of the assignee, the final dividend not having been declared. The following question pertinent to the proceedings has arisen, and I have been requested to certify the same to the district judge, for his opinion thereon,, to wit: “Whether the costs incurred upon petition of bankrupts for their discharge, the hearing on said petition, publication of notice of hearing, etc., shall be paid by the assignee out of funds in his hands belonging to the estate of said bankrupts, or by the bankrupts themselves.” In my opinion the assignee, when he has funds, should pay such costs. The bankrupts having, by force of law, surrendered all their property to be disposed of for the benefit of their creditors, it seems just and right that the avails of such property shall, so far as necessary, be used to give the bankrupts that relief which, upon conformity to the requirements of the law, they are entitled to claim, viz., a discharge from their debts. The case would be different if creditors successfully opposed the granting of a discharge, but when no opposition is made, and the bankrupts in all things conform to their duty under the act, they should not be deprived of the discharge which (unless the costs thereof shall be paid by the assignee out of the estate funds) they may not have the pecuniary ability to obtain. Section 28 of the bankrupt act provides that in the order for a dividend, the following claims shall be entitled to priority and to be first paid in full: First, the fees, costs, and expenses of suits, and the several proceedings in bankruptcy under this act. The proceedings on petition for discharge are certainly “proceedings in bankruptcy.”
[Reprinted by permission.]

Opinion:
WITHEY, District Judge.
The decision of the register, J. Davidson Burns, Esq., certified above, is approved.