Case Name: In re: Reynoldo DESAMOUR, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-05-27
Citations: 132 F. App'x 419
Docket Number: No. 05-1666
Parties: In re: Reynoldo DESAMOUR, Petitioner.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 132
Pages: 419–420

Head Matter:
In re: Reynoldo DESAMOUR, Petitioner.
No. 05-1666.
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Submitted Under Rule 21, Fed: R.App. P. March 11, 2005.
Decided May 27, 2005.
Reynold Desamour, Elkton FCI, Lisbon, OH, pro se.
Barbara J. Cohan, Office of United States Attorney, Philadelphia, PA, for Respondent.
Before Chief Judge SCIRICÁ, WEIS and GARTH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
OPINION
PER CURIAM.
Reynoldo Desamour has filed a mandamus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651, seeking to compel the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to rule on his motion filed pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b). It appears that the District Court has recently entered an order disposing of his Rule 60 motion. Accordingly, the petition for a writ of mandamus will be denied as moot. Desamour may, of course, challenge the District Court's disposition of his Rule 60(b) motion by filing a timely notice of appeal in accordance with the dictates of Rules 3 and 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.