Case Name: Charles M. KEENAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank HALL, Director Oregon Department of Corrections, et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1998-02-11
Citations: 135 F.3d 1318
Docket Number: No. 94-35726
Parties: Charles M. KEENAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank HALL, Director Oregon Department of Corrections, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 135
Pages: 1318–1318

Head Matter:
Charles M. KEENAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank HALL, Director Oregon Department of Corrections, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 94-35726.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Feb. 11, 1998.
Before: SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING AND REJECTING EN BANC REQUEST
ORDER
The opinion, Slip op. 5571, filed May 8, 1996 [83 F.3d 1083] is amended as follows: add a footnote to "major difference between the conditions for the general prison population and the segregated population" in line 2 on page 5578 [83 F.3d at 1089] of the Slip op.: "The Court expressed it thusly: 'Based on a comparison between inmates inside and outside disciplinary segregation, the State's actions in placing [Sandin] there for 30 days did not work a major disruption in his environment.' Sandin at 486,115 S.Ct. at 2301."
With this change, Judges Schroeder and Fletcher have voted to deny the petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for rehearing en bane. Judge Rymer voted to grant the petition for rehearing and to accept the suggestion for rehearing en banc.
The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc and no judge of the court has requested a vote on it. Fed. R.App. P. 35(b).
Ihe petition tor rehearing is demed anc the suggestion for rehearing en banc is re jected.