Case Name: Mrs. Emma TYNER et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. John L. KEITH, Defendant in Error
Court: Texas Commission of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1929-02-13
Citations: 13 S.W.2d 687
Docket Number: No. 1174-5159
Parties: Mrs. Emma TYNER et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. John L. KEITH, Defendant in Error.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 13
Pages: 687–687

Head Matter:
Mrs. Emma TYNER et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. John L. KEITH, Defendant in Error.
(No. 1174-5159.)
Commission of Appeals of Texas, Section A.
Feb. 13, 1929.
James H. Rachford, of Beaumont, for plaintiffs in error.
E. L. Nall, King & Jackson, Leon Sonfield, and A. L. Calhoun, all of Beaumont, and J. W. Williams, of Port Arthur, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
HARVEY, P. J.
The facts of this ease are similar to those in the case of Mrs. Emma Tyner et al. v. John La Coste, 13 S.W.(2d) 685, this day decided; and. the same questions of law are presented in the two cases. Our holdings in that case control the disposition of this case. We therefore recommend that the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals affirming the judgment of the trial court herein be affirmed.
CURETON, C. J.
Judgments of the district court and Court of Civil Appeals both affirmed, as recommended by the Commission of Appeals.