Case Name: Tamara Joan HAEG, Respondent, v. SEKO WORLDWIDE d/b/a Vast Logistics, Relator, and Minnesota Assigned Risk Plan, adm'd by Berkley Risk Administrators, Respondent, and Regions Hospital, St. Paul Radiology, North Memorial Ambulance Service, and Twin City Anesthesia Associates, Intervenors
Court: Minnesota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Minnesota
Decision Date: 2007-05-30
Citations: 732 N.W.2d 200
Docket Number: No. A07-258
Parties: Tamara Joan HAEG, Respondent, v. SEKO WORLDWIDE d/b/a Vast Logistics, Relator, and Minnesota Assigned Risk Plan, adm’d by Berkley Risk Administrators, Respondent, and Regions Hospital, St. Paul Radiology, North Memorial Ambulance Service, and Twin City Anesthesia Associates, Intervenors.
Judges: 
Reporter: North Western Reporter 2d
Volume: 732
Pages: 200–201

Head Matter:
Tamara Joan HAEG, Respondent, v. SEKO WORLDWIDE d/b/a Vast Logistics, Relator, and Minnesota Assigned Risk Plan, adm’d by Berkley Risk Administrators, Respondent, and Regions Hospital, St. Paul Radiology, North Memorial Ambulance Service, and Twin City Anesthesia Associates, Intervenors.
No. A07-258.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
May 30, 2007.
Gary L. Meyer, Meyer, Puklich, Merriam & Johnson, Eden Prairie, MN, for Respondent.
Kris A. Wittwer, Stewart, Zlimen & Jungers, Ltd., Minneapolis, MN, for Relator/Respondent.
Roderick C. Cosgriff, Heacox, Hartman, Koshmrl, Cosgriff, & Johnson, P.A., Saint Paul, MN, for Intervenors.

Opinion:
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed January 4, 2007, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that [s]ummary af-firmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).
BY THE COURT:
/s/Sam Hanson Associate Justice