Case Name: ENSLEY, Appellant, v. FITZWATER, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1982-01-25
Citations: 55 Or. App. 737
Docket Number: No. 77-12-324, CA 19525
Parties: ENSLEY, Appellant, v. FITZWATER, Respondent.
Judges: Before Joseph, Chief Judge, Warden, Judge, and Holman, Senior Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 55
Pages: 737–739

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted October 19, 1981,
appeal dismissed January 25,
reconsideration denied March 11,
petition for review allowed April 6, 1982 (292 Or 825)
See later issue Oregon Reports
ENSLEY, Appellant, v. FITZWATER, Respondent.
(No. 77-12-324, CA 19525)
639 P2d 716
Gilah Tenenbaum, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.
Nancy S. Tauman, Oregon City, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief was Hibbard, Caldwell, Canning, Bowerman & Schultz, Oregon City.
Before Joseph, Chief Judge, Warden, Judge, and Holman, Senior Judge.
HOLMAN, S. J.
Holman, S. J., vice Warren, J.

Opinion:
HOLMAN, S. J.
Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal as follows:
"Plaintiff-Appellant Clifford O. Ensley hereby gives Notice of Appeal from the order granting defendant's motion for summary judgment, dated October 27, 1980, and the order denying plaintiffs motion for rehearing and motion to set aside the order granting defendant's motion for a summary judgment, "
The order of October 27, 1980, which is appealed from, recites as follows:
"IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant's motion for summary judgment is granted in its entirety."
The second order (November 3, 1980), which is appealed from, recites as follows:
"ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED AS FOLLOWS:
"1. Plaintiffs motion for rehearing and motion to set aside the order granting defendant's motion for summary judgment is hereby denied.
"2. Defendant's Order for summary judgment in favor of defendant is hereby granted."
After the entry of the two orders above set forth, the trial court entered a judgment order dated November 3, 1980, as follows:
"ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that judgment shall be entered herein in favor of the defendant and for defendant's costs and disbursements incurred herein in the sum of $__
"IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall take nothing."
The orders ruling on the motions were not final orders and were, therefore, not appealable. ORS 19.010. There was no appeal taken from the judgment and, therefore, the appeal is dismissed.