Case Name: ALBERT E. KILLEEN et al., Petitioners, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; HENRY SACHS, Real Party in Interest
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1958-04-29
Citations: 159 Cal. App. 2d 807
Docket Number: Civ. No. 23106
Parties: ALBERT E. KILLEEN et al., Petitioners, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; HENRY SACHS, Real Party in Interest.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports, Second Series
Volume: 159
Pages: 807–808

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 23106.
Second Dist., Div. Three.
Apr. 29, 1958.]
ALBERT E. KILLEEN et al., Petitioners, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; HENRY SACHS, Real Party in Interest.
Richard A. Perkins and Arnerich, Del Valle & Sinatra for Petitioners.
No appearance for Respondent.
S. L. Kurland and Robert Green for Real Party in Interest.

Opinion:
THE COURT.
Upon the hearing pursuant to the alternative writ of prohibition heretofore issued herein the matter was argued and submitted. The alternative writ is discharged and a peremptory writ is denied for the reason that it has not been made to appear to the satisfaction of this court that the order confirming the ex parte appointment of a receiver of the property described in the petition herein was in excess of the discretionary powers of the court and the additional fact that the petitioner has an adequate remedy through his pending appeal from said order.