Case Name: Samuel H. Huxford, Respondent v. Matilda S. Stoddart, Appellant
Court: New York Superior Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1890-06-27
Citations: 26 Jones & S. 584
Docket Number: 
Parties: Samuel H. Huxford, Respondent v. Matilda S. Stoddart, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Reports of cases argued and determined in the Superior Court of the city of New York
Volume: 58
Pages: 584–584

Head Matter:
Samuel H. Huxford, Respondent v. Matilda S. Stoddart, Appellant.
Decided June 27, 1890.
Appeal by defendant from judgment entered in favor of plaintiff upon the verdict of a jury, and from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.
Alexander Thain and George William Hart, Jr., for appellant. Truax & Crandell, for respondent.
Before Freedman and O’Gorman, JJ.

Opinion:
The Court
held (Freedman, J., writing, O'Gorman, J., concurring) that the judgment and order should be affirmed with costs.