Case Name: Howard Earl HOOVER, Appellant, v. James B. KIRBY and Daniel B. REPLOGLE, Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1925-02-02
Citations: 4 F.2d 287
Docket Number: No. 1712
Parties: Howard Earl HOOVER, Appellant, v. James B. KIRBY and Daniel B. REPLOGLE, Appellees.
Judges: Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, ROBB, Associate Justice, and BARBER, Judge of the United States Court of Customs Appeals.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 4
Pages: 287–287

Head Matter:
Howard Earl HOOVER, Appellant, v. James B. KIRBY and Daniel B. REPLOGLE, Appellees.
(Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.
Submitted January 15, 1925.
Decided February 2, 1925.)
No. 1712.
Donald M. Carter, of Chicago, 111., and J. S. Barker, of Washington, D. C., for appellant.
D. B. Replogle, of Berkeley, Cal., for appellees.
Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, ROBB, Associate Justice, and BARBER, Judge of the United States Court of Customs Appeals.

Opinion:
ROBB, Associate Justice.
This interference involves substantially the same question determined in the preceding interference, No. 1711, 4 F.(2d) 287, just decided, and was so considered by the Patent Office. For the reasons stated in the other decision, we affirm the decision here.
Affirmed.
Petition for rehearing denied February 21,1925.