Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Hubert HOLMES, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-06-02
Citations: 967 S.W.2d 725
Docket Number: Nos. WD 52081, WD 54502
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Hubert HOLMES, Appellant.
Judges: Before ELLIS, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and RIEDERER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 967
Pages: 725–725

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Hubert HOLMES, Appellant.
Nos. WD 52081, WD 54502.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
June 2, 1998.
Kent Denzel, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Seth A. Albín, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for Respondent.
Before ELLIS, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and RIEDERER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant-Movant was convicted of robbery first degree, armed criminal action, resisting arrest, and possession of a controlled substance. On direct appeal he seeks reversal, under plain error, for the prosecutor's closing argument. In his Rule 29.15 appeal he asserts counsel was incompetent for failure to object in closing argument, and for failing to seek a change of venue based on pretrial publicity. Judgments affirmed. Rule 30.25(b) and Rule 84.16(b).