Case Name: Keith A. SHRUM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2007-08-31
Citations: 965 So. 2d 198
Docket Number: No. 5D06-1606
Parties: Keith A. SHRUM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: TORPY, LAWSON and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 965
Pages: 198–199

Head Matter:
Keith A. SHRUM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D06-1606.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Aug. 31, 2007.
Rehearing Denied Oct. 3, 2007.
Keith A. Shrum, Lake Butler, pro se.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Ap-pellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant challenges the summary denial of his motion to withdraw plea filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.170(0- We affirm the summary denial in all respects except Appellant's contention that the fine imposed was in violation of the plea agreement. The plea agreement is not in the record on appeal. When we ordered that it be filed, the lower court clerk was unable to locate it. Therefore, Appellant's contention that the fine violated the plea agreement has not been refuted by the record. On remand, the lower court is directed to conduct an evi-dentiary hearing on this point or attach portions of the record that conclusively refute the claim.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part and REMANDED.
TORPY, LAWSON and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
. Although the plea agreement is not in the record on appeal, Appellant furnished the court with what he purports to be a copy of the plea agreement. The document is not signed by a judge but does bear the purported signature of the assistant state attorney. Whether the document is authentic will have to be determined by the trial court on remand.