Case Name: George E. GOULD, Appellant, v. PAILLARD PRODUCTS, Inc., a corporation, Appellee
Court: District of Columbia Municipal Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Decision Date: 1958-03-31
Citations: 139 A.2d 864
Docket Number: No. 2115
Parties: George E. GOULD, Appellant, v. PAILLARD PRODUCTS, Inc., a corporation, Appellee.
Judges: Before ROVER, Chief Judge, and HOOD and QUINN, Associate Judges.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 139
Pages: 864–864

Head Matter:
George E. GOULD, Appellant, v. PAILLARD PRODUCTS, Inc., a corporation, Appellee.
No. 2115.
Municipal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.
Argued Jan. 13, 1958.
Decided March 31, 1958.
Rehearing Denied April 11, 1958.
George E. Gould, pro se.
Philip Shinberg, Washington, D. C, entered an appearance for appellee, but filed no brief.
Before ROVER, Chief Judge, and HOOD and QUINN, Associate Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant was sued on a judgment of the Municipal Court of the City of New York. He defended on the ground that the New York judgment was invalid. The trial court found against appellant, denied his motion for new trial, and entered judgment against him on October 17, 1956. No^ appeal was taken from the judgment. On August 2, 1957, after appellant had been ordered to answer written interrogatories relating to his assets, he filed a motion for "dismissal" of the judgment. That motion was denied and this appeal is from its denial.
The appeal must be dismissed. Even if there be any merit in appellant's contention regarding the invalidity of the New York judgment, it is now too late to consider it. The question could and should have been brought here by direct appeal from the local judgment entered on the foreign judgment. Time for such appeal has long passed, and the belated motion to dismiss or vacate the judgment presents no question which can be reviewed by this court. MacVey v. MacVey, D.C.Mun.App., 98 A.2d 794.
Appeal dismissed.