Case Name: Todd M. JACK, M.S., Ph.D., Trustee, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William STUBBLEFIELD, Ph.D., County Commissioner of Berkeley County, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-09-09
Citations: 342 F. App'x 902
Docket Number: No. 09-1758
Parties: Todd M. JACK, M.S., Ph.D., Trustee, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. William STUBBLEFIELD, Ph.D., County Commissioner of Berkeley County, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before MICHAEL and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 342
Pages: 902–902

Head Matter:
Todd M. JACK, M.S., Ph.D., Trustee, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. William STUBBLEFIELD, Ph.D., County Commissioner of Berkeley County, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 09-1758.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 28, 2009.
Decided: Sept. 9, 2009.
Todd M. Jack, Appellant pro Se.
Before MICHAEL and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Todd M. Jack appeals the district court's order dismissing this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jack v. Stubblefield, No. 5:09-cv-00046-gec, 2009 WL 1809931 (W.D.Va. filed June 22, entered June 23, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.