Case Name: LIBERTY TRUCKING, INC., and Charles Ross, Jr., Appellants, v. Patrick W. JOYNER, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2009-02-19
Citations: 8 So. 3d 380
Docket Number: No. 1D08-0112
Parties: LIBERTY TRUCKING, INC., and Charles Ross, Jr., Appellants, v. Patrick W. JOYNER, Appellee.
Judges: KAHN and BENTON, JJ, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 8
Pages: 380–380

Head Matter:
LIBERTY TRUCKING, INC., and Charles Ross, Jr., Appellants, v. Patrick W. JOYNER, Appellee.
No. 1D08-0112.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Feb. 19, 2009.
Rehearing Denied May 20, 2009.
E.T. Fernandez, III, and Sorena S. Fal-lin, of Fernandez Trial Lawyers, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellants.
William D. Keith and John Thom Cardil-lo, of Cardillo, Keith & Bonaquist, P.A., Naples, for Appellee.

Opinion:
BROWNING, J.
AFFIRMED. See Lamb v. Matetzschk, 906 So.2d 1037, 1044 (Fla.2005) (Pariente, C.J., concurring) ("[Wjhere the liability of one defendant is based on vicarious liability and the issue of vicarious liability is undisputed, apportionment of the offer between the active tortfeasor and the vicarious tortfeasor is problematic because the liability of both defendants is not apportioned but is coextensive.... No matter how clever a defendant or plaintiff might be in attempting to frame an offer, the reality is that there is no rational method to apportion fault.").
KAHN and BENTON, JJ, concur.