Case Name: Stoddard, agent, etc., v. Churchill Line
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1927-11-16
Citations: 37 Ga. App. 347
Docket Number: 18312
Parties: Stoddard, agent, etc., v. Churchill Line.
Judges: Luhe <md Bloodworth, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 37
Pages: 347–349

Head Matter:
18312.
Stoddard, agent, etc., v. Churchill Line.
Decided November 16, 1927.

Opinion:
Broyles, C. J.
The ease, by consent of both parties, was submitted to the court, without the intervention of a jury, upon an agreed statement of facts, and the court did not err in rendering a judgment in favor of the defendant, or thereafter in refusing to grant a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Luhe <md Bloodworth, JJ., concur.
H. Mercer Jordan, Robert L. Golding, for plaintiff, cited: 128 Ga. 628 (4); Id. 695; 15 Ga. App. 678 (2); 141 Ga. 565 (2).
Stephens & Stephens, for defendant, cited: Civil Code (1910), § 4266, 4227; 16 Ga. App. 636.