Case Name: Paula MELLEY, Appellant, v. MARINER'S WAY ASSOCIATION, INC. and David Hemingway, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2017-11-01
Citations: 229 So. 3d 831
Docket Number: No. 4D16-2795
Parties: Paula MELLEY, Appellant, v. MARINER’S WAY ASSOCIATION, INC. and David Hemingway, Appellees.
Judges: Gerber, C.J., May and Levine, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 229
Pages: 831–832

Head Matter:
Paula MELLEY, Appellant, v. MARINER’S WAY ASSOCIATION, INC. and David Hemingway, Appellees.
No. 4D16-2795
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
[November 1, 2017]
Robert Rivas of Sachs Sax Caplan, P.L., Tallahassee, for appellant.
Kathryn L. Ender of Cole, Scott & Kis-sane, P.A., Miami, for appellee Mariner’s Way Association, Inc.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Appellant sought a declaratory judgment against Mariner's Way Association relating to the expansion of her boat dock. After years of litigation, the Association moved to dismiss the complaint as moot, stating that it was no longer contesting the dock modifications. Over appellant's objection, the trial court dismissed the complaint and entered a final judgment in corporating the Association's unilateral stipulation.
A trial court's discretion is limited when it "essentially enters a declaratory judgment as to one or more significant, disputed issues while describing the judgment as an order of dismissal." Ribaya v. Bd. of Trs. of City Pension Fund for Firefighters & Police Officers in City of Tampa, 162 So.3d 348, 354 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015). Additionally, "it is difficult for a trial court to justify its discretionary act of dismissal at that stage [of ruling on a motion to dismiss] unless the parties have made stipulations or concessions on the record[.]" Id. at 353.
In the instant case, the Associations unilateral stipulation did not afford appellant all of the relief she sought inasmuch as the relief in the stipulation did not cover all items pled in the third amended complaint. As such, we find the trial court erred in entering the dismissal, and we reverse and remand for further proceedings. Because the Association no longer contests the main issue in the complaint— the dock modifications—this case should be able to be resolved expeditiously on remand;..
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
Gerber, C.J., May and Levine, JJ., concur.