Case Name: CADILLAC MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. OWENS
Court: Michigan Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Michigan
Decision Date: 1969-02-27
Citations: 16 Mich. App. 235
Docket Number: Docket No. 4,404
Parties: CADILLAC MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. OWENS
Judges: BEFORE: Lesinski, C. J., and J. H. Gtllis and Beer, JJ.
Reporter: Michigan appeals reports; cases decided in the Michigan Court of Appeals.
Volume: 16
Pages: 235–236

Head Matter:
CADILLAC MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. OWENS
Appeal from Common Pleas Court of Detroit, Henry J. Szymanski, J.
Submitted Division 1 November 13, 1968, at Detroit.
(Docket No. 4,404.)
Decided February 27, 1969.
Declaration by Cadillac Mutual Insurance Company, a foreign corporation, as subrogee of Cecil P. Dunn, and Cecil P. Dunn against Florence Y. Owens, who eross-complains against plaintiffs, for automobile negligence. Judgment for defendant on plaintiff’s declaration and judgment of damages for defendant on tbe cross-declaration. Plaintiffs appeal.
Affirmed.
Sugar, Schwartz & Silver (Stephen N. Ross, of counsel), for plaintiffs.
Prosser, Cowell, Renner & Molineaux, for defendant.
BEFORE: Lesinski, C. J., and J. H. Gtllis and Beer, JJ.
Cireuit Judge, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
In a non jury trial, at the conclusion of proofs, the trial court entered a judgment of no cause of action on plaintiffs' declaration and a judgment in favor of defendant Owens on her cross- declaration for damages in an automobile negligence action.
On appeal, plaintiffs challenge the trial court's finding that plaintiff Dunn's wife was negligent and that defendant Florence Owens was not.
A review of the record discloses evidentiary support for the trial court's findings. The appellants have failed to demonstrate to this Court that the action of the trial court in denying judgment for plaintiffs and entering a judgment in favor of defendant was clearly erroneous.
Affirmed. Costs to appellee.