Case Name: David Falconer, complainant-appellant, v. Ricker Realty Company et al., defendants-respondents
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1935-01-10
Citations: 117 N.J. Eq. 452
Docket Number: 
Parties: David Falconer, complainant-appellant, v. Ricker Realty Company et al., defendants-respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 117
Pages: 452–453

Head Matter:
David Falconer, complainant-appellant, v. Ricker Realty Company et al., defendants-respondents.
[Submitted October 26th, 1934.
Decided January 10th, 1935.]
Mr. Nathan Rabinowitz and Mr. Isadore Rabinowitz, for the complainant-appellant.
Mr. John O. Benson, for the defendants-respondents.

Opinion:
Pee Cueiam.
This is an appeal from a decree of the court of chancery, advised by Vice-Chancellor Bigelow, dismissing the bill of complaint which sought an injunction to prevent the defendants-respondents from obstructing the natural flow of the waters of a stream at a point above lands of complainant-appellant. The vice-chancellor held that the proofs adduced by the appellant failed to sustain the cause of action set out in the hill of complaint.
A careful consideration of the evidence leads us to the conclusion that the court below was correct in the finding on the facts, and the decree should be affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Paekee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Dohges, Hehee, Peeskie, Van Buskiek, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, JJ. 13.
For reversal — -None.