Case Name: Peter ARSENEAULT, a minor by his parents and next friends Joseph and Jane ARSENEAULT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-11-26
Citations: 51 F. App'x 412
Docket Number: No. 02-1793
Parties: Peter ARSENEAULT, a minor by his parents and next friends Joseph and Jane ARSENEAULT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 51
Pages: 412–413

Head Matter:
Peter ARSENEAULT, a minor by his parents and next friends Joseph and Jane ARSENEAULT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 02-1793.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 7, 2002.
Decided Nov. 26, 2002.
Peter Arseneault, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Ellen McGowan, Siciliano, Ellis, Dyer & Boccarosse, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Peter Arseneault, by his next friends and parents, Joseph and Jane Arseneault, appeal the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Prince William County School Board on his claim that the School Board denied him a free appropriate public education in violation of the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act (IDEA), 20 U.S.C. § 1400-1487 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Arseneault v. Prince William County Sch. Bd. No. CA-01-725-A (E.D. Va. June 7, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.