Case Name: Brinson v. Sacks, Warden
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1961-05-10
Citations: 172 Ohio St. 256
Docket Number: No. 36829
Parties: Brinson v. Sacks, Warden.
Judges: Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taft, Matthias, Bell, Radcliff and O’Neill, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, New Service
Volume: 172
Pages: 256–257

Head Matter:
Brinson v. Sacks, Warden.
(No. 36829
Decided May 10, 1961.)
Mr. John Brinson, in propria persona.
Mr. Mark McElroy, attorney general, and Mr. Aubrey A. Wendt, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
A parole violator is not entitled to credit for the periods of his declared violations, and, therefore, petitioner has not served the maximum sentence imposed and is not entitled to his release by habeas corpus. Ex parte Gosier, 171 Ohio St., 403; Rigg v. Correction Dept., Parole Board Div., 170 Ohio St., 347.
Petitioner remanded to custody.
Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taft, Matthias, Bell, Radcliff and O'Neill, JJ., concur.
Radcliff, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Herbert, J.