Case Name: Michael A. WHITE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-10-23
Citations: 58 S.W.3d 895
Docket Number: No. ED 79324
Parties: Michael A. WHITE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 58
Pages: 895–895

Head Matter:
Michael A. WHITE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 79324.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Oct. 23, 2001.
Irene C. Karns, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Shaun J. Mackelprang, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Michael White, appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing. He contends his plea attorney provided ineffective assistance by failing to file a motion to suppress. Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).