Case Name: Nathaniel CATO, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1993-09-07
Citations: 860 S.W.2d 400
Docket Number: No. 63414
Parties: Nathaniel CATO, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 860
Pages: 400–400

Head Matter:
Nathaniel CATO, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 63414.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Sept. 7, 1993.
Elizabeth Haines, St. Louis,' for movant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Nathaniel Cato, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The judgments of conviction which movant sought to vacate were for sixteen counts of robbery in the first degree and thirteen counts of armed criminal action. Movant was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to concurrent terms of imprisonment of twenty-five years on each count.
The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value.
The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).