Case Name: Lucy B. Pound et al., complainants-appellants, v. Henry W. Pleister, defendant-respondent
Court: New Jersey Court of Chancery
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1931-02-02
Citations: 107 N.J. Eq. 577
Docket Number: 
Parties: Lucy B. Pound et al., complainants-appellants, v. Henry W. Pleister, defendant-respondent.
Judges: For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Daly, Van Bus-kirk, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 12.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 107
Pages: 577–577

Head Matter:
Lucy B. Pound et al., complainants-appellants, v. Henry W. Pleister, defendant-respondent.
[Argued May 26th, 1930.
Decided February 2d, 1931.]
Mr. Earl A. Merrill, for the appellants.
■ ■ No appearance, for the respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This is an action for specific performance and the learned vice-chancellor dismissed the bill of complaint, from which decree so advised the complainant below appeals.
Without going into details it is sufficient to say that we conclude that the opinion of this court in Lennig v. Ocean City Association, 41 N. J. Eq. 606, is controlling and for that reason the decree below is affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Daly, Van Bus-kirk, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.