Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dominic Antonio MARSHALL, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-12-29
Citations: 117 F. App'x 295
Docket Number: No. 04-4360
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Dominic Antonio MARSHALL, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 117
Pages: 295–295

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Dominic Antonio MARSHALL, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 04-4360.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 8, 2004.
Decided Dec. 29, 2004.
Robert L. Jenkins, Jr., Bynum & Jenkins, P.L.L.C., Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney, Michael J. Elston, Assistant United States Attorney, Natalie A. Voris, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Dominic Antonio Marshall appeals the district court's judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict finding him guilty of conspiring to distribute 50 grams or more of crack cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (2000), and distributing 50 grams or more of crack cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (2000). On appeal, Marshall challenges the district court's denial of his oral motion for acquittal made pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 29(a). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.