Case Name: IN RE: Henry Earl MILLER, a/k/a Stef, a/k/a Stefan, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-02-27
Citations: 712 F. App'x 342
Docket Number: No. 18-1007
Parties: IN RE: Henry Earl MILLER, a/k/a Stef, a/k/a Stefan, Petitioner.
Judges: Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 712
Pages: 342–343

Head Matter:
IN RE: Henry Earl MILLER, a/k/a Stef, a/k/a Stefan, Petitioner.
No. 18-1007
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: February 22, 2018
Decided: February 27, 2018
Henry Earl Miller, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Henry Earl Miller petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and motion for bond pending resolution of his habeas motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we' grant leavé to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED