Case Name: Rose Mirabile et al., Appellants, v. Albert Profy et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1983-06-13
Citations: 95 A.D.2d 800
Docket Number: 
Parties: Rose Mirabile et al., Appellants, v Albert Profy et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 95
Pages: 800–800

Head Matter:
Rose Mirabile et al., Appellants, v Albert Profy et al., Respondents.

Opinion:
— In a medical malpractice action, plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lerner, J.), dated August 24, 1982, as dismissed their complaint against defendant Profy for lack of jurisdiction over said defendant. Judgment affirmed, insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. (See Chalk v Catholic Med. Center of Brooklyn & Queens, 58 AD2d 822; Glickman v Horowitz, 66 AD2d 814.) Mollen, P. J., Weinstein, Brown and Rubin, JJ., concur.