Case Name: In the Matter of the Application of the Attorney-General of the State of New York, Respondent. Ludwig C. A. K. Martens, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1926-05-04
Citations: 242 N.Y. 595
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Application of the Attorney-General of the State of New York, Respondent. Ludwig C. A. K. Martens, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 242
Pages: 595–596

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Application of the Attorney-General of the State of New York, Respondent. Ludwig C. A. K. Martens, Appellant.
(Submitted April 5, 1926;
decided May 4, 1926.)
Charles Recht and Osmond K. Fraenkel for appellant.
Albert Ottinger, Attorney-General (.Robert P. Beyer of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
Order affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the former adjudication on the application of the appellant for the return of the security is binding on the parties and prevents them from litigating over again the same issue. (Williams v. Barkley, 165 N. Y. 48.)
Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ.