Case Name: Kenneth SCHNEIDER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2013-10-22
Citations: 411 S.W.3d 871
Docket Number: No. ED 99247
Parties: Kenneth SCHNEIDER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 411
Pages: 871–871

Head Matter:
Kenneth SCHNEIDER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 99247.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Oct. 22, 2013.
Ellen H. Flottman, Columbia, MO, for Movant/Appellant.
Todd T. Smith, Karen L. Kramer, Jefferson City, MO, for RespondenVRespon-dent.
Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Kenneth Schneider appeals from the motion court's denial, following an eviden-tiary hearing, of his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 24.035. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2011, unless otherwise indicated.