Case Name: Curtis D. SHULER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard NEELY, Superintendent, Lanesboro Correctional Institution; C.W. Clark, Supervisor, Food Management, Lanesboro Correctional Institution; J. Bennett, Supervisor, Programs, Lanesboro Correctional Institution, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-08-30
Citations: 445 F. App'x 682
Docket Number: No. 11-6592
Parties: Curtis D. SHULER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Richard NEELY, Superintendent, Lanesboro Correctional Institution; C.W. Clark, Supervisor, Food Management, Lanesboro Correctional Institution; J. Bennett, Supervisor, Programs, Lanesboro Correctional Institution, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 445
Pages: 682–683

Head Matter:
Curtis D. SHULER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Richard NEELY, Superintendent, Lanesboro Correctional Institution; C.W. Clark, Supervisor, Food Management, Lanesboro Correctional Institution; J. Bennett, Supervisor, Programs, Lanesboro Correctional Institution, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 11-6592.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 25, 2011.
Decided: Aug. 30, 2011.
Curtis D. Shuler, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Curtis D. Shuler appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and conclude there is no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Shuler v. Neely, No. 3:11-cv-00182-RJC (W.D.N.C. Apr. 19, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.