Case Name: Clarence DiBlasi v. Theodore Brown et al.
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1988-11-07
Citations: 17 Conn. App. 803
Docket Number: 6144
Parties: Clarence DiBlasi v. Theodore Brown et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Appellate Reports
Volume: 17
Pages: 803–804

Head Matter:
Clarence DiBlasi v. Theodore Brown et al.
(6144)
Dupont, C. J., Spallone and Foti, Js.
Argued October 14
decision released November 7, 1988
Michael A. D’Amico, for the appellant (defendant Carol Russo).
Denise Derby, for the appellee (plaintiff).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The defendant Carol Russo's claims of error implicate the fact finding function of the trial court. We will not retry the case. Our review fails to disclose that the factual findings of the court were clearly erroneous in view of the evidence and pleadings in the whole record, or that the decision was otherwise erroneous in law. Practice Book § 4061.
There is no error.