Case Name: Maurice PATTERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-09-25
Citations: 55 S.W.3d 888
Docket Number: No. ED 79128
Parties: Maurice PATTERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 55
Pages: 888–888

Head Matter:
Maurice PATTERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 79128.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Sept. 25, 2001.
Mark A. Grothoff, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Stacy L. Anderson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Maurice Patterson, appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
. All Rule references are to the Missouri Court Rules (2001).