Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. DeLaunte BOZEMAN, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2015-06-16
Citations: 466 S.W.3d 38
Docket Number: ED 100971
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. DeLaunte BOZEMAN, Appellant.
Judges: Before Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J. and Robert G. Dowd, Jr. and Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 466
Pages: 38–39

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. DeLaunte BOZEMAN, Appellant.
ED 100971
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Filed: June 16, 2015
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 28, 2015
Lisa M. Stroup, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for Appellant.
Chris A. Koster, Attorney General, Mary H. Moore, Asst. Attorney General, P. O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899, for Respondent.
Before Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J. and Robert G. Dowd, Jr. and Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
DeLaunte Bozeman ("Defendant") appeals from the judgment of the trial court upon his convictions for two counts of first-degree assault, Section 565.050, RSMo 2000, and two counts of armed criminal action, Section 571.015. Defendant contends the trial court: (1) erred in denying his motions for judgment of acquittal; and (2) plainly erred in allowing the State to ask in voir dire about a difference between "indentification" and "description."
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the trial court did not err or abuse its discretion. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
. All further statutory references are to RSMo 2000.