Case Name: State v. Lomax
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2002-01-28
Citations: 94 Ohio St. 3d 1444
Docket Number: 99-889
Parties: State v. Lomax.
Judges: Douglas, J., would also appoint counsel.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 94
Pages: 1444–1444

Head Matter:
Monday, January 28, 2002
MOTION DOCKET
99-889.
State v. Lomax.

Opinion:
Sandusky C.P. No. 96CR448. This cause is pending before the court as a death penalty appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Sandusky County. Upon consideration of the motion for recusal of the Sandusky County Prosecutor's Office,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for recusal be, and hereby is, granted.
Douglas, J., would also appoint counsel.
Moyer, C. J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., dissent.
Resnick, J., not participating.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the oral argument scheduled in this case for January 29, 2002, be postponed until further order of the court.
Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., dissent.
Resnick, J., not participating.