Case Name: Betty Louise HARRINGTON, Appellant, v. Marshall C. HARRINGTON, Appellee
Court: District of Columbia Municipal Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Decision Date: 1958-10-28
Citations: 145 A.2d 288
Docket Number: No. 2254
Parties: Betty Louise HARRINGTON, Appellant, v. Marshall C. HARRINGTON, Appellee.
Judges: Before ROVER,. Chief Judge, and HOOD and QUINN, Associate Judges.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 145
Pages: 288–288

Head Matter:
Betty Louise HARRINGTON, Appellant, v. Marshall C. HARRINGTON, Appellee.
No. 2254.
Municipal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.
Argued Sept. 22, 1958.
Decided Oct. 28, 1958.
Julius Poms, Washington, D. C., with whom Sidney S. Sachs and Lewis Jacobs, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellant.
Katherine M. Staley, Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Before ROVER,. Chief Judge, and HOOD and QUINN, Associate Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The background for this appeal may be found in our opinion in Harrington v. Harrington, D.C.Mun.App., 145 A.2d 121. While the main appeals were pending the wife moved to have the husband adjudged in contempt for failure to make payments for support of the child, and also moved for judgment against the husband for the arrears in such payments. The trial court denied the motions and this appeal was taken from that denial. In the light of our opinion on the main appeals we find no error in this appeal.
Affirmed.