Case Name: Swint, Adm'r vs. Central Railroad et al.
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1885
Citations: 1 Ga. L. Rep. 254
Docket Number: 
Parties: Swint, Adm’r vs. Central Railroad et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Georgia Law Reporter
Volume: 1
Pages: 254–255

Head Matter:
Swint, Adm’r vs. Central Railroad et al.
(Jam:, from Chatham. New Trial. Presumptions. '.!> Tore Judge Adams.)

Opinion:
Jackson, C. J.
The presiding judge being dissatisfied with the-verdict, and having granted a first new trial, one ground of'the motion being that the verdict was contrary to law and evidence, this court will not control bis discretion in so doing; nor will it closely scan any views of the law expressed by the judge in granting the new trial, the presumption being that on the second hearing, he will correct his own •errors, if any.
P. H. Brewster; Wr. A.Post; Lester & Eavenel, for plaintiff in error.
Lawton tfc Cunningham; Jos. B. Gumming, for defendants.
Judgment affirmed.