Case Name: Stephen SATCHER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. David WILSON, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-01-30
Citations: 674 F. App'x 324
Docket Number: No. 16-7180
Parties: Stephen SATCHER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. David WILSON, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 674
Pages: 324–325

Head Matter:
Stephen SATCHER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. David WILSON, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 16-7180
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: January 20, 2017
Decided: January 30, 2017
Stephen Satcher, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Campbell Altmeyer, Tara Noel Tighe, Assistant United States Attorneys,. Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Stephen D. Satcher, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order declining to adopt the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Satcher's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Satcher v. Wilson, No. 5:15-cv-00152-FPS-JES, 2016 WL 4098550 (N.D. W. Va. July 29, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED