Case Name: CHANCE PILKINGTON LIMITED, Pilkington Brothers plc., Appellants, v. VISUAL SCENE, INC., Myron Orlinsky and Peter Patraka and Metro Corp., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1986-05-13
Citations: 488 So. 2d 155
Docket Number: Nos. 86-735, 86-736
Parties: CHANCE PILKINGTON LIMITED, Pilkington Brothers plc., Appellants, v. VISUAL SCENE, INC., Myron Orlinsky and Peter Patraka and Metro Corp., Appellees.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 488
Pages: 155–155

Head Matter:
CHANCE PILKINGTON LIMITED, Pilkington Brothers plc., Appellants, v. VISUAL SCENE, INC., Myron Orlinsky and Peter Patraka and Metro Corp., Appellees.
Nos. 86-735, 86-736.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 13, 1986.
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, William L. Gardner, Robert S. Schlossberg, Washington, D.C., Lowell L. Garrett and Gary S. Koenigsberg, Miami, for appellants.
Bailey & Dawes and Mercedes C. Busto, Beasley, Olle, Downs & Keihner, Miami, Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering and Roger M. Witten, M. Carolyn Cox, Bruce M. Berman, James Sottile, IV, Washington, D.C., for appellees.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Agreeing that the contacts with the State of Florida of both appellant Pilkington Brothers pic. and appellant Chance Pilking-ton Limited were sufficient to warrant the trial court's exercise of personal jurisdiction pursuant to the long-arm statute, we affirm the order denying appellants' motions to dismiss. § 48.193(l)(a), Fla.Stat. (1985); see Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 2174, 85 L.Ed.2d 528 (1985); Waldrip v. Dyal Sales Co., 436 So.2d 418 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Anson v. Lemperuer, 390 So.2d 478 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).
Affirmed.