Case Name: Jean Claude NANA, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-10-12
Citations: 698 F. App'x 753
Docket Number: No. 17-1337
Parties: Jean Claude NANA, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III Respondent.
Judges: Before KEENAN, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 698
Pages: 753–753

Head Matter:
Jean Claude NANA, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III Respondent.
No. 17-1337
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: September 21, 2017
Decided: October 12, 2017
Godwill C. Tachi, THE TACHI LAW FIRM, LLC, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Petitioner. Chad A. Readier, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Jessica E. Burns, Senior Litigation Counsel, Juria L. Jones, Office of Immigration- Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Before KEENAN, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jean Claude Nana, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("Board") dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge's denial of his requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript of Nana's merits hearing and all supporting evidence. We conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial evidence supports the Board's decision, see INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. In re Nana, (B.I.A. Feb. 17, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED