Case Name: Sherman Clayton MONTGOMERY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Matthew G. EWEND, Neuro-Surgeon at UNC-Chapel Hill, North Carolina, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-07-24
Citations: 191 F. App'x 182
Docket Number: No. 06-6055
Parties: Sherman Clayton MONTGOMERY, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Matthew G. EWEND, Neuro-Surgeon at UNC-Chapel Hill, North Carolina, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 191
Pages: 182–182

Head Matter:
Sherman Clayton MONTGOMERY, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Matthew G. EWEND, Neuro-Surgeon at UNC-Chapel Hill, North Carolina, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 06-6055.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 20, 2006.
Decided: July 24, 2006.
Sherman Clayton Montgomery, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Sherman Clayton Montgomery appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Montgomery v. Ewend, No. CA-05-673-5 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 30, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.