Case Name: HIGBY DEVELOPMENT, LLC, Petitioner v. John SARTOR, J. Russell Yerkes, Yerkes Associates, Inc., Lee Ledbetter, Norman Vutz, Daniel Keogh, Uday Patankar and Marietta M. Marquart, Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2010-03-23
Citations: 605 Pa. 456
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 540 MAL 2008
Parties: HIGBY DEVELOPMENT, LLC, Petitioner v. John SARTOR, J. Russell Yerkes, Yerkes Associates, Inc., Lee Ledbetter, Norman Vutz, Daniel Keogh, Uday Patankar and Marietta M. Marquart, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 605
Pages: 456–456

Head Matter:
991 A.2d 305
HIGBY DEVELOPMENT, LLC, Petitioner v. John SARTOR, J. Russell Yerkes, Yerkes Associates, Inc., Lee Ledbetter, Norman Vutz, Daniel Keogh, Uday Patankar and Marietta M. Marquart, Respondents.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
March 23, 2010.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 23rd day of March, 2010, it appearing that the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County erred in granting Respondents' preliminary objections as to Petitioner's intentional tort claims on the basis that Petitioner had failed adequately to allege willful misconduct, and it further appearing that the Commonwealth Court erred in affirming that determination, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, the Order of the Commonwealth Court dated July 14, 2008 is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County to reinstate Petitioner's intentional tort claims.