Case Name: Mary E. CHAMBERS, Appellant v. OFFICE OF the ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al., Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-12-09
Citations: 672 F. App'x 15
Docket Number: No. 16-7090
Parties: Mary E. CHAMBERS, Appellant v. OFFICE OF the ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al., Appellees
Judges: BEFORE: Tatel, Kavanaugh, and Millett, Circuit Judges
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 672
Pages: 15–16

Head Matter:
Mary E. CHAMBERS, Appellant v. OFFICE OF the ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al., Appellees
No. 16-7090
September Term, 2016
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Filed: 12/09/2016
Johnnie L. Johnson, III, Senior Trial Attorney, Law Office of Johnnie Louis Johnson III LLC, Reston, VA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Lucy E. Pittman, Assistant Attorney General, Loren L. AliKhan, Deputy Solicitor General, Todd Sunhwae Kim, Solicitor General, Office of the Attorney General, District of Columbia, Office of the Solicitor General, Washington, DC, for Defendants-Appellees.
BEFORE: Tatel, Kavanaugh, and Millett, Circuit Judges

Opinion:
ORDER
Per Curiam
Upon consideration of the motion for summary affirmance and the response thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion for summary affirmance be denied and, on the court's own motion, that the case be remanded to the district court for reconsideration of its dismissal of the complaint with prejudice and dismissal of the case in light of this court's recent decision in Cohen v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of Columbia, 819 F.3d 476 (D.C. Cir. 2016).
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.