Case Name: Steven A. GOYNES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joel CAVAZOS, Police Officer (in his individual and official capacity); Timothy Santos, Police Officer (in his individual and official capacity); The City of Norfolk, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-10-20
Citations: 584 F. App'x 182
Docket Number: No. 14-1556
Parties: Steven A. GOYNES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joel CAVAZOS, Police Officer (in his individual and official capacity); Timothy Santos, Police Officer (in his individual and official capacity); The City of Norfolk, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 584
Pages: 182–183

Head Matter:
Steven A. GOYNES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joel CAVAZOS, Police Officer (in his individual and official capacity); Timothy Santos, Police Officer (in his individual and official capacity); The City of Norfolk, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 14-1556.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 16, 2014.
Decided: Oct. 20, 2014.
Steven A. Goynes, Appellant Pro Se. Melvin Wayne Ringer, City Attorney’s Office, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Steven A. Goynes appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Goynes v. Cavazos, No. 2:13-cv-00542-AWA-LRL (E.D.Va. May 8, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.