Case Name: John J. BOWMAN, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Anya KOVSLEK; Joel Ziegler; G. Esparza; Robert Trybus; Jeffrey Duranko; Robert Roff; Matthew Geyer; Eric Elza; Dane Zimmerman; Brian Callihan; Veronica Fernandez; Kenny Adams; D. Shaw, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-12-19
Citations: 458 F. App'x 268
Docket Number: No. 11-2068
Parties: John J. BOWMAN, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Anya KOVSLEK; Joel Ziegler; G. Esparza; Robert Trybus; Jeffrey Duranko; Robert Roff; Matthew Geyer; Eric Elza; Dane Zimmerman; Brian Callihan; Veronica Fernandez; Kenny Adams; D. Shaw, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 458
Pages: 268–269

Head Matter:
John J. BOWMAN, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Anya KOVSLEK; Joel Ziegler; G. Esparza; Robert Trybus; Jeffrey Duranko; Robert Roff; Matthew Geyer; Eric Elza; Dane Zimmerman; Brian Callihan; Veronica Fernandez; Kenny Adams; D. Shaw, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 11-2068.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 15, 2011.
Decided: Dec. 19, 2011.
John J. Bowman, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Alan McGonigal, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Ap-pellees.
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
John J. Bowman appeals the district court's order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bowman v. Kovslek, No. 1:10-cv-00106-IMK-JSK, 2011 WL 3667557 (N.D.W.Va., Aug. 22, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.