Case Name: J. Howard ARNOLD, Appellant, v. William J. McGUINESS, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1968-08-05
Citations: 400 F.2d 392
Docket Number: No. 21814
Parties: J. Howard ARNOLD, Appellant, v. William J. McGUINESS, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 400
Pages: 392–392

Head Matter:
J. Howard ARNOLD, Appellant, v. William J. McGUINESS, Appellee.
No. 21814.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
Aug. 5, 1968.
Rehearing Denied Sept. 23, 1968.
J. Howard Arnold (argued), Berkeley, Cal., for appellant.
Thomas J. Fennone (argued), Deputy County Counsel, Richard J. Moore, County Counsel, Oakland, Cal., for appel-lee.
Before JERTBERG and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges, and FOLEY, District Judge .
Roger D. Foley, District of Nevada, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
We have carefully considered appellant's assignments of error and they have no merit. We agree with and adopt the decision of the district court. We also reaffirm this Court's prior decisions, wherein J. Howard Arnold was twice before this Court as the appellant.
Affirmed.
. See Memorandum and Order filed February 2, 1967, Arnold v. McGuiness, U.S. D.O. N.D.Calif., 289 F.Supp. 210.
. See Arnold v. Bostick, 9 Cir., 1964, 339 F.2d 879, cert. den. 382 U.S. 858, 86 S. Ct. 113, 15 L.Ed.2d 96; unreported Order in Arnold v. McGuiness, 9 Cir., 1966, No. 20617, cert. den. 386 U.S. 996, 87 S.Ct. 1315, 18 D.Ed.2d 343.