Case Name: Joel P. GORDON, Appellant, v. FORTUNE SAVINGS BANK, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-05-16
Citations: 561 So. 2d 30
Docket Number: No. 89-2775
Parties: Joel P. GORDON, Appellant, v. FORTUNE SAVINGS BANK, Appellee.
Judges: WALDEN, GUNTHER and GARRETT, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 561
Pages: 30–30

Head Matter:
Joel P. GORDON, Appellant, v. FORTUNE SAVINGS BANK, Appellee.
No. 89-2775.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
May 16, 1990.
Martin H. Colin of Altman & Colin, Lake Worth, for appellant.
Paul F. Probst of Larson, Conklin, Stanley & Probst, P.A., Clearwater, for appel-lee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the summary final judgment entered in favor of Plaintiff, Fortune Savings Bank, and against Defendant, Joel P. Gordon, because there exists a genuine issue of material fact which precludes entry of summary judgment as a matter of law. That issue is whether or not Fortune Savings Bank was a holder in due course as concerns the promissory note in question that was assigned to it. Seinfeld v. Commercial Bank & Trust, 405 So.2d 1039 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).
REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent herewith.
WALDEN, GUNTHER and GARRETT, JJ., concur.