Case Name: George S. Gans, Respondent, v. Marvin G. Connally, Individually, Appellant, and Marvin G. Connally, Archibald H. Whan and Harry M. Smith, Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of A. H. Whan & Company, Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1929-02
Citations: 225 A.D. 897
Docket Number: 
Parties: George S. Gans, Respondent, v. Marvin G. Connally, Individually, Appellant, and Marvin G. Connally, Archibald H. Whan and Harry M. Smith, Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of A. H. Whan & Company, Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 225
Pages: 897–897

Head Matter:
George S. Gans, Respondent, v. Marvin G. Connally, Individually, Appellant, and Marvin G. Connally, Archibald H. Whan and Harry M. Smith, Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of A. H. Whan & Company, Defendants.

Opinion:
Order denying motion of defendant Connally for a further bill of particulars modified by directing that plaintiff furnish particulars of the services that he claims were to be rendered by defendant Connally or the other defendants, of the services actually rendered, and of the years or periods covered by income taxes for which refunds were to be sought and were actually obtained. As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Seeger, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur.