Case Name: William Teplitzky, Appellant, v. William Lippman and Another, Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1932-03-25
Citations: 143 Misc. 244
Docket Number: 
Parties: William Teplitzky, Appellant, v. William Lippman and Another, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 143
Pages: 244–244

Head Matter:
William Teplitzky, Appellant, v. William Lippman and Another, Respondents.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
March 25, 1932.
Levine & Gold [Irving Levine of counsel], for the appellant.
Louis Cohn, for the respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Service of the summons by leaving it at the office of the Secretary of State in the city of New York, coupled with compliance by plaintiff with the other provisions of section 52 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law (as amd. by Laws of 1930, chap. 57), sufficed to give the court jurisdiction of the defendants. (Stoibor v. Marinacci, 142 Misc. 345; affd., 235 App. Div. 714.)
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.
All concur; present, Lydon, Frankenthaler andUntermyer, JJ.