Case Name: Charles Isaac WILSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant Does, All other inmates similarly situated, Plaintiff v. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Defendant Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections; State Fire Marshall, Defendants-Appellees State of Arkansas, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-04-23
Citations: 600 F. App'x 1013
Docket Number: No. 15-1003
Parties: Charles Isaac WILSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant Does, All other inmates similarly situated, Plaintiff v. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Defendant Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections; State Fire Marshall, Defendants-Appellees State of Arkansas, Defendant.
Judges: Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 600
Pages: 1013–1014

Head Matter:
Charles Isaac WILSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant Does, All other inmates similarly situated, Plaintiff v. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Defendant Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections; State Fire Marshall, Defendants-Appellees State of Arkansas, Defendant.
No. 15-1003.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: April 13, 2015.
Filed: April 23, 2015.
Charles Isaac Wilson, Jr., Grady, Alt, pro se.
Charles Lyford, Attorney General’s Office, Little Rock, AR, for Defendants-Ap-pellees.
Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
. Wendy Kelley has been appointed to serve as Director of the Arkansas Department of Correction, and is substituted as appellee pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Arkansas inmate Charles Wilson brought an action claiming that conditions at the Cummins Unit of the Arkansas Department of Correction did not comply with relevant safety standards. The district court denied preliminary injunctive relief, and this interlocutory appeal followed. After careful review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion, for the reasons discussed by the court in its opinion. See Dataphase Sys., Inc. v. C L Sys., Inc., 640 F.2d 109, 113 (8th Cir.1981). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable H. David Young, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.