Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. David VASQUEZ-LARA, also known as Victor Luna, also known as Victor Acosta Luna, also known as David Velasquez Lara, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-01-11
Citations: 507 F. App'x 374
Docket Number: No. 11-11226
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. David VASQUEZ-LARA, also known as Victor Luna, also known as Victor Acosta Luna, also known as David Velasquez Lara, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING, CLEMENT, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 507
Pages: 374–375

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. David VASQUEZ-LARA, also known as Victor Luna, also known as Victor Acosta Luna, also known as David Velasquez Lara, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-11226
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Jan. 11, 2013.
Nancy E. Larson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Fort Worth, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Jerry Van Beard, Esq., Laura S. Harper, Esq., Assistant Federal Public Defenders, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before KING, CLEMENT, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent David Vasquez-Lara has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Vasquez-Lara has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.