Case Name: Clarence LEFLORA, Jr., an Individual, Appellant, v. ROYAL AMERICAN MANAGEMENT, INC., a Florida Profit Corporation, Appellee.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2018-12-12
Citations: 260 So. 3d 515
Docket Number: No. 3D17-1767
Parties: Clarence LEFLORA, Jr., an Individual, Appellant,
v.
ROYAL AMERICAN MANAGEMENT, INC., a Florida Profit Corporation, Appellee.
Judges: Before LAGOA, SCALES, and LINDSEY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 260
Pages: 515–515

Head Matter:
Clarence LEFLORA, Jr., an Individual, Appellant,
v.
ROYAL AMERICAN MANAGEMENT, INC., a Florida Profit Corporation, Appellee.
No. 3D17-1767
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Opinion filed December 12, 2018
Goldberg & Rosen, P.A., and Judd G. Rosen, Zachary D. Bodenheimer, and Khristopher R. Salado, for appellant.
Cole Scott & Kissane, P.A., and Kathryn L. Ender, and Maria D. Vera, for appellee.
Before LAGOA, SCALES, and LINDSEY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Carbonell v. BellSouth Telcomms., Inc., 675 So.2d 705 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) ("A party seeking a continuance bears the burden of showing, by affidavit, the existence and availability of other evidence, its relevance, the efforts taken to produce it, and that any failure to do so is not the result of the movant's inexcusable delay." (citing Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510(f) ) ).