Case Name: MECHANICS NATIONAL BANK OF BURLINGTON COUNTY, A NATIONAL BANKING ASSOCIATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. JAMES C. BRADY, JR., COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF BANKING, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND FIDELITY BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1972-11-06
Citations: 61 N.J. 514
Docket Number: 
Parties: MECHANICS NATIONAL BANK OF BURLINGTON COUNTY, A NATIONAL BANKING ASSOCIATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. JAMES C. BRADY, JR., COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF BANKING, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND FIDELITY BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 61
Pages: 514–515

Head Matter:
MECHANICS NATIONAL BANK OF BURLINGTON COUNTY, A NATIONAL BANKING ASSOCIATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. JAMES C. BRADY, JR., COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF BANKING, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND FIDELITY BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Argued October 11, 1972
Decided November 6, 1972.
Mr. William F. Tompkins argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Lum, Biunno & Tompkins, attorneys; Mr. Walter J. Fessler, on the brief).
Mr. Stephen Skillman, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent, James C. Brady, Jr. (Mr. George F. Kugler, Jr., Attorney General, attorney; Mr. Charles A. Terribile, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).
Mr. Edward Suski, Jr. argued the cause for respondent, Fidelity Bank and Trust Company (Messrs. Wilinski, Coruzzi & Suski, attorneys).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment of the Appellate Division, 121 N. J. Super. 62, is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in its opinion.
For affirmance — -Chief Justice Weintraub, Justices Jacobs, Proctor, Hall and Mountain, and Judge Conford — 6.
For reversal — None.