Case Name: William BRUNNER, Petitioner, v. James R. McDONOUGH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2007-08-14
Citations: 965 So. 2d 176
Docket Number: No. 1D06-3819
Parties: William BRUNNER, Petitioner, v. James R. McDONOUGH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Respondent.
Judges: BARFIELD, ALLEN, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 965
Pages: 176–176

Head Matter:
William BRUNNER, Petitioner, v. James R. McDONOUGH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Respondent.
No. 1D06-3819.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Aug. 14, 2007.
Rehearing Denied Oct. 2, 2007.
William Brunner, pro se, for Petitioner.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Joy A. Stubbs, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner seeks certiorari review of the circuit court's denial of his petition for writ of mandamus. Specifically, petitioner challenges the circuit court's order imposing a lien on his inmate trust account and its determination that he was provided with all process due during his prison disciplinary proceeding.
Since the underlying action constitutes a collateral criminal proceeding, the circuit court did not have statutory authority to impose a lien for court costs and filing fees. See Schmidt v. Crusoe, 878 So.2d 361, 367 (Fla.2003); Crosby v. Fla. Parole Comm'n, 949 So.2d 1181, 1183 (Fla. 1 DCA 2007). Therefore, we GRANT this petition for writ of certiorari inasmuch as it contested the circuit court's order imposing a lien and QUASH such order. However, we conclude that Petitioner's due process claims are without merit. Consequently, we DENY that portion of the petition alleging due process violations.
BARFIELD, ALLEN, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.