Case Name: Wesley E. Parsons vs. Philadelphia, Wilmington and Baltimore Railroad Company
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Jurisdiction: Delaware
Decision Date: 1894-02
Citations: 2 Marv. 379
Docket Number: 
Parties: Wesley E. Parsons vs. Philadelphia, Wilmington and Baltimore Railroad Company.
Judges: 
Reporter: Delaware Reports
Volume: 16
Pages: 379–379

Head Matter:
Wesley E. Parsons vs. Philadelphia, Wilmington and Baltimore Railroad Company.
New Castle County,
February Term, 1894.
Practice. Jury.—Where a special jury is asked for and a list of names submitted by the prothonotary, and, the case being continued at the next trial, a special jury is again asked, the prothonotary is not confined to the old list.
Higgins, for the plaintiff.
Gray and Ward, for the defendant.

Opinion:
This case was upon the trial list for the November term; 1893, and when it was called á special jury was asked and the prothonotary submitted a list of names. Later in the term, the case was continued until the February term following. At the latter term a venire was asked for, by the defendant. The question was raised, whether the prothonotary was confined to the old list, and the Court ruled that he was not.