Case Name: Anthony John DUARTE, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Arthur CALDERON, Warden, Respondent-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-01-13
Citations: 120 F. App'x 106
Docket Number: No. 03-57218
Parties: Anthony John DUARTE, Petitioner—Appellee, v. Arthur CALDERON, Warden, Respondent—Appellant.
Judges: Before: BEEZER, HALL, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 120
Pages: 106–106

Head Matter:
Anthony John DUARTE, Petitioner—Appellee, v. Arthur CALDERON, Warden, Respondent—Appellant.
No. 03-57218.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 10, 2005.
Decided Jan. 13, 2005.
Michael Tanaka, Esq., FPDCA-Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner-Appellee.
Kenneth C. Byrne, Esq., Susan S. Kim, Esq., AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondent-Appellant.
Before: BEEZER, HALL, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Warden Arthur Calderon appeals the district court's order granting California state prisoner Anthony John Duarte's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. In supplemental briefing regarding the effect of this court's recent decision in Gibson v. Ortiz, 387 F.3d 812 (2004) (holding that jury instruction on evidence of other prior sexual offenses and accompanying instruction on preponderance of evidence standard violated defendant's due process rights), both parties state that the district court's judgment should be affirmed. We agree. The district court's judgment is
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.