Case Name: Manuel Domingo NAMUR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-05-29
Citations: 561 So. 2d 472
Docket Number: No. 89-1876
Parties: Manuel Domingo NAMUR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before COPE, GERSTEN and GODERICH, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 561
Pages: 472–473

Head Matter:
Manuel Domingo NAMUR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 89-1876.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 29, 1990.
Barbara S. Levenson, Coral Gables, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Ivy Ginsberg, and Jacqueline Valdespino, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.
Before COPE, GERSTEN and GODERICH, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 92 S.Ct. 2182, 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972); Brown v. State, 428 So.2d 250 (Fla.), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1209, 103 S.Ct. 3541, 77 L.Ed.2d 1391 (1983); Dodd v. State, 537 So.2d 626 (Fla.3d DCA 1988); Wale v. State, 397 So.2d 738 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Hively v. State, 336 So.2d 127 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976).