Case Name: Malevis E. DE LEON, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, United States Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-02-14
Citations: 264 F. App'x 284
Docket Number: No. 07-1080
Parties: Malevis E. DE LEON, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, United States Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 264
Pages: 284–284

Head Matter:
Malevis E. DE LEON, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, United States Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 07-1080.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 11, 2008.
Decided: Feb. 14, 2008.
Frederic W. Schwartz, Jr., Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Leslie McKay, Senior Litigation Counsel, Lindsay B. Glauner, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Malevis E. De Leon, a native and citizen of Columbia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("Board") dismissing her appeal from the immigration judge's denial of her motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board's order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in upholding the denial of De Leon's motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(1)(iv) (2007). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: De Leon, No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ] (B.I.A. Jan. 17, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.