Case Name: In the Interest of T.M.D., Jr. and T.M.D., minors. Juvenile Officer, Petitioner/Respondent, v. B.J.W., Respondent, and T.M.D., Respondent/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-04-05
Citations: 159 S.W.3d 523
Docket Number: Nos. ED 85066, ED 85067
Parties: In the Interest of T.M.D., Jr. and T.M.D., minors. Juvenile Officer, Petitioner/Respondent, v. B.J.W., Respondent, and T.M.D., Respondent/Appellant.
Judges: Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 159
Pages: 523–523

Head Matter:
In the Interest of T.M.D., Jr. and T.M.D., minors. Juvenile Officer, Petitioner/Respondent, v. B.J.W., Respondent, and T.M.D., Respondent/Appellant.
Nos. ED 85066, ED 85067.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
April 5, 2005.
Chris N. Weiss, Jackson, MO, for appellant.
Matthew J. Koetting, Cape Girardeau, MO, for respondent Juvenile Officer.
Jeffrey P. Dix, Jackson, MO, Guardian Ad Litem.
Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Father appeals from the trial court's judgments terminating his parental rights to his two minor children pursuant to Section 211.447 RSMo (2000). The judgments are supported by substantial evidence and are not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgments are affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).