Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Douglas YARN, Appellant; Douglas VARN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1994-08-23
Citations: 885 S.W.2d 739
Docket Number: Nos. 62686, 64635
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Douglas YARN, Appellant. Douglas VARN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GRIMM, C.J., and CRIST and CARL R. GAERTNER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 885
Pages: 739–739

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Douglas YARN, Appellant. Douglas VARN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 62686, 64635.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Aug. 23, 1994.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Sept. 28, 1994.
Application to Transfer Denied Nov. 22, 1994.
Lester W. Duggan, Jr., St. Charles, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Millie Aulbur, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before GRIMM, C.J., and CRIST and CARL R. GAERTNER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant, Douglas Varn, appeals from his conviction of one count of child abuse and his sentence to eight months incarceration in the St. Louis County Department of Justice Services and a $5,000 fine. He also appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm both judgments.
We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; no error of law appears, and the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgments pursuant to Rule 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).