Case Name: In the Matter of Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, Appellant, v. Town of Tonawanda Assessor et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1996-11-08
Citations: 233 A.D.2d 920
Docket Number: Appeal No. 1
Parties: In the Matter of Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, Appellant, v Town of Tonawanda Assessor et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 233
Pages: 920–920

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, Appellant, v Town of Tonawanda Assessor et al., Respondents.
(Appeal No. 1.)
[649 NYS2d 871]

Opinion:
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted respondents' motion to settle the record on appeal and did not improperly limit the record on respondents' appeals. The contention of petitioner that the court erred in denying its cross motion to resettle a prior order by failing to include certain case law has not been preserved for our review. We note, in any event, that "an order denying a motion to resettle a substantive portion of a previous order is not appeal-able" (Gifaldi v Dumont Co., 172 AD2d 1025, 1026). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Glownia, J.—Settle Record.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Fallon, Callahan and Doerr, JJ.