Case Name: LOUIS ROSS v. STATE
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1924-06-28
Citations: 2 Ohio Law Abs. 535
Docket Number: 
Parties: LOUIS ROSS v. STATE
Judges: 
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 2
Pages: 535–535

Head Matter:
No. 532
LOUIS ROSS v. STATE
Ohio Appeals, 7th Dist., Mahoning County
Decided June 28, 1924
Published Only in Ohio Law Abstract
333. CRIMINAL LAW — 1. There is no prejudicial error in charging a jury in a first degree murder that the jury must find the defendant struck the blow for the purpose of causing death.
2. It is not reversable error to charge “the fact that he used this bat and struck this man over the head, malice would be inferred from that.” Although a mistaken statement of the rule>.
Attorneys — Moore, Barnum & Hammond, for Ross; H. H. Hull, Pros. Atty., for State; all of Youngstown.

Opinion:
FARR, J.
Error proceedings to reverse a judgment sentencing Ross after being indicted and found guilty of first degree murder upon grounds that the charge to the jury was prejudicial and the judgment is against the weight of the evidence as to premeditation and deliberation. On Sept. 16, Ross had attempted to stop a quarrel between Gordon and Farrari, whereupon Farrari slapped and kicked him, and threatened to kill him. On Sept. 19, Ross invited Farrari into his house with others and while drinking, Ross and Farrari quarreled, whereupon Ross hit Farrari over the head with a ball bat and killed him. Later in the day, Ross dismembered the body, and buried it, warning his children not to say anything to anybody. In affirming the judgment below, the court held:
1. The charge to the jury that it must be proven "that he purposely inflicted the blow which caused the death" is not error.
2. There is sufficient testimony that the jury might well find there was both premeditation and deliberation.
3. There was no reversible error in the charge, although several parts were criticized.