Case Name: 68TH STREET APTS., INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, ET AL., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CASIMIRO LAURICELLA, D/B/A CASS ELECTRIC CO., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT; CASIMIRO LAURICELLA, D/B/A CASS ELECTRIC CO., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. INTROCASO CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. AND RALPH L. INTROCASO, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1977-05-13
Citations: 150 N.J. Super. 47
Docket Number: 
Parties: 68TH STREET APTS., INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, ET AL., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CASIMIRO LAURICELLA, D/B/A CASS ELECTRIC CO., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. CASIMIRO LAURICELLA, D/B/A CASS ELECTRIC CO., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. INTROCASO CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. AND RALPH L. INTROCASO, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 150
Pages: 47–48

Head Matter:
68TH STREET APTS., INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, ET AL., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CASIMIRO LAURICELLA, D/B/A CASS ELECTRIC CO., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. CASIMIRO LAURICELLA, D/B/A CASS ELECTRIC CO., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. INTROCASO CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. AND RALPH L. INTROCASO, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued April 26, 1977
Decided May 13, 1977.
Before Judges Lynch, Milmed and Antell.
Mr. Antranig Aslanian, Jr. argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Gigante & Aslanian, attorneys).
Mr. Howard M. Nashel argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Platoff, Heftler, Harker & Nashel, attorneys).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The portions of the order for judgment under review are affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Gaulkin in his opinion reported at 142 N. J. Super. 546 (Law Div. 1976).