Case Name: Ronald Jean-Louis et al., Respondents, v. 345 Riverside Drive Apartment Corp., Appellant. (And a Third-Party Action.)
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1999-03-23
Citations: 259 A.D.2d 402
Docket Number: 
Parties: Ronald Jean-Louis et al., Respondents, v 345 Riverside Drive Apartment Corp., Appellant. (And a Third-Party Action.)
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 259
Pages: 402–402

Head Matter:
Ronald Jean-Louis et al., Respondents, v 345 Riverside Drive Apartment Corp., Appellant. (And a Third-Party Action.)
[687 NYS2d 104]

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered on or about December 3, 1997, which granted plaintiffs' motion to restore the action to the trial calendar, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The action, which was marked off the calendar after an unanswered calendar call, was properly restored to the calendar upon plaintiffs' attorney's affirmation that he never received notice from the court of the missed calendar call, and court records consistent with the possibility that such notice was misdirected to plaintiffs' former attorney. Significantly, plaintiffs were busily engaged in significant pretrial activity with third-party defendant during the period that the case was off the calendar. The merit of the action is sufficiently demonstrated by the verified complaint, of which the motion court was free to take judicial notice. Nor is there any indication of prejudice to defendant attributable to the off-calendar status of the action. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Williams and Wallach, JJ.