Case Name: Lloyd ROBERTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard Ollen BROADWELL, III; Marry Goodman, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-10-20
Citations: 620 F. App'x 183
Docket Number: No. 15-7039
Parties: Lloyd ROBERTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard Ollen BROADWELL, III; Marry Goodman, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 620
Pages: 183–183

Head Matter:
Lloyd ROBERTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard Ollen BROADWELL, III; Marry Goodman, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15-7039.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 15, 2015.
Decided: Oct. 20, 2015.
Lloyd Roberts, Appellant Pro Se.
Nathan Douglas Childs, Elizabeth Pharr McCullough, Young Moore & Henderson, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina; Donna Elizabeth Tanner, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Lloyd Roberts appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Roberts v. Broadwell, No. 5:12-ct-03207-F (E.D.N.C. June 23, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.