Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Quentin E. WALKER, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2014-09-02
Citations: 439 S.W.3d 851
Docket Number: No. ED 99475
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Quentin E. WALKER, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, C.J., LISA S. VAN AMBURG, J., and GLORIA CLARK RENO, SP. J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 439
Pages: 851–851

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Quentin E. WALKER, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 99475.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Sept. 2, 2014.
Timothy J. Forneris, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Dora Fichter, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, C.J., LISA S. VAN AMBURG, J., and GLORIA CLARK RENO, SP. J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Quentin Walker ('Walker") appeals from the judgment of conviction by the trial court, after a jury found him guilty of one count of attempted burglary in the first degree and one count of property damage in the second degree.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. We find no plain error. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).