Case Name: Ex Parte Bailey Cross
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1926-06-09
Citations: 105 Tex. Crim. 52
Docket Number: No. 10317
Parties: Ex Parte Bailey Cross.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Criminal Reports
Volume: 105
Pages: 52–53

Head Matter:
Ex Parte Bailey Cross.
No. 10317.
Delivered June 9, 1926.
Sam D. Stinson, State’s Attorney, and Robert M. Lyles, Assistant State’s Attorney, for the State.

Opinion:
HAWKINS, Judge.
Relator presents to this court an original application for habeas corpus contending that a judgment condemning him to serve nineteen years in the penitentiary for the offense of robbery with firearms is void because the sentence failed to follow the law relative to indeterminate sentences, and diréct his imprisonment for not less than five nor more than nineteen years. This is an attempt to collaterally attack the judgment which we think is not void but subject to correction by direct proceeding in the trial court.
The writ is denied.
Writ denied.