Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John VALENTI and Charles Corces, Defendants, Times Publishing Company, Intervenor-Appellant. In re TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1993-08-24
Citations: 999 F.2d 1425
Docket Number: Nos. 92-3125, 92-3128
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John VALENTI and Charles Corces, Defendants, Times Publishing Company, Intervenor-Appellant. In re TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY, Petitioner.
Judges: Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, and CARNES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 999
Pages: 1425–1430

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John VALENTI and Charles Corces, Defendants, Times Publishing Company, Intervenor-Appellant. In re TIMES PUBLISHING COMPANY, Petitioner.
Nos. 92-3125, 92-3128.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Aug. 24, 1993.
George K. Rahdert, Rahdert & Anderson, St. Petersburg, FL, for intervenor-appellant.
Vicki Johnson, Asst. U.S. Atty., U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for plaintiff-appel-lee.
Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, and CARNES, Circuit Judges.
Judge Black recused herself and did not participate in this decision.

Opinion:
ON SUA SPONTE CONSIDERATION OF REHEARING EN BANC
PER CURIAM:
A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the reconsideration of his cause en banc, and a majority of the judges in active service not having voted in favor of it, Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.