Case Name: John C. MONTUE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael E. PATTERSON; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-05-25
Citations: 10 F. App'x 534
Docket Number: No. 99-17229; D.C. # CV-98-2099-FCD(JFM)
Parties: John C. MONTUE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael E. PATTERSON; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before PREGERSON, FERNANDEZ, and WARD LAW, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 10
Pages: 534–534

Head Matter:
John C. MONTUE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael E. PATTERSON; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 99-17229.
D.C. # CV-98-2099-FCD(JFM).
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 14, 2001.
Decided May 25, 2001.
Before PREGERSON, FERNANDEZ, and WARD LAW, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
John C. Montue, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) as frivolous and malicious. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo dismissals pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). See Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.2000). We affirm the dismissal for the reasons stated in the Findings and Recommendations filed on June 9, 1999 and adopted by the district court by order of July 1, 1999.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.