Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. FRANK JOHN STUART, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1987-07-22
Citations: 86 Or. App. 538
Docket Number: 84-2497 & 84-1693; CA A40383 & A40497
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. FRANK JOHN STUART, Appellant.
Judges: Before Warden, Presiding Judge, and Van Hoomissen and Rossman, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 86
Pages: 538–539

Head Matter:
Submitted on record and briefs June 8,
affirmed July 22,
reconsideration denied August 28, petition for review denied September 22, 1987 (304 Or 186)
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. FRANK JOHN STUART, Appellant.
(84-2497 & 84-1693; CA A40383 (Control) & A40497)
739 P2d 74
Frank John Stuart, Salem, filed the brief pro se for appellant.
Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General and Douglas F. Zier, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Warden, Presiding Judge, and Van Hoomissen and Rossman, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant appeals his convictions for attempted murder and assault in the first degree. He contends, inter alia, that the trial court erred in failing to "merge" his convictions for purposes of conviction and sentencing. He did not raise the merger issue below. We will not consider it, because his assignment raises no new and different facets of the merger problem, and that any failure to merge would not result in egregious error. See State v. Corpuz, 49 Or App 811, 820-21, 621 P2d 604 (1980); State v. Applegate, 39 Or App 17, 23, 591 P2d 371, rev den 287 Or 301 (1979).
We have considered defendant's other assignments, that the trial court erred in refusing to suppress his statements, in admitting prior bad acts evidence and in imposing a minimum term of imprisonment based on his use of a firearm during the crime, and conclude that they lack merit.
Affirmed.