Case Name: HOROWITZ, Appellant, v. SMITH, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1901-06
Citations: 72 N.Y.S. 1108
Docket Number: 
Parties: HOROWITZ, Appellant, v. SMITH, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 72
Pages: 1108–1108

Head Matter:
HOROWITZ, Appellant, v. SMITH, Respondent.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
June, 1901.)
Action by Adolph Horowitz against Charles F. Smith.
J. R. Tressider, for appellant. J. 15. Brodsky, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
A review of the testimony shows that the court below, upon conflicting evidence as to the status and authority of Skinner, found in favor of the defendant. That conclusion necessarily resulted in a judgment for the defendant, and we are disinclined to disturb it, in face of the conflict in the proofs. Judgment affirmed, with costs.