Case Name: Jeffrey FOERSTER and Taunya Foerster, Appellants, v. REGENT BANK, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2013-04-03
Citations: 110 So. 3d 526
Docket Number: No. 4D12-1037
Parties: Jeffrey FOERSTER and Taunya Foerster, Appellants, v. REGENT BANK, Appellee.
Judges: STEVENSON, CIKLIN and GERBER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 110
Pages: 526–526

Head Matter:
Jeffrey FOERSTER and Taunya Foerster, Appellants, v. REGENT BANK, Appellee.
No. 4D12-1037.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
April 3, 2013.
Mark Perlman of Mark Perlman, P.A., Hallandale Beach, for appellants.
Suzanne M. McLean of Webber, Hinden, McLean & Arbeiter, P.A., Pembroke Pines, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellants Jeffrey and Taunya Foerster, defendants below, appeal a final summary judgment of foreclosure in favor of Appel-lee Regent Bank. We reverse the summary judgment because there remains a genuine issue of material fact regarding whether appellee complied with the condition precedent contained in the mortgage to provide pre-suit notice of acceleration. See Finnegan v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co., 96 So.3d 1093, 1094 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (reversing summary judgment as letters sent to appellant were not properly considered on motion for summary judgment and bank's affidavit did not address compliance with pre-suit notice of default).
Reversed.
STEVENSON, CIKLIN and GERBER, JJ., concur.