Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sedgwick JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-10-25
Citations: 535 F. App'x 534
Docket Number: No. 03-1322
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sedgwick JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before RICHARD D. CUDAHY, Circuit Judge, ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge, and ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 535
Pages: 534–534

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sedgwick JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 03-1322.
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Oct. 25, 2013.
David E. Bindi, Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, Plaintiff-Ap-pellee.
Joseph P. Franklin, Rancho Mirage, CA, Defendant-Appellant.
Before RICHARD D. CUDAHY, Circuit Judge, ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge, and ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
We issued a limited remand in this case to inquire whether the district court would impose the same 360-month sentence on Sedgwick Johnson if it knew the full extent of its discretion. After considering both parties' positions, the district court has responded that it would reimpose the same sentence. Accordingly, there was no plain error in Johnson's sentence, see United States v. Paladino, 401 F.3d 471, 484 (7th Cir.2005), and the judgment of the district court is Affirmed.