Case Name: Andrew Sattalich, Appellant, v. Inez Liben, Also Known as Inez Berlin, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1959-02-05
Citations: 17 Misc. 2d 149
Docket Number: 
Parties: Andrew Sattalich, Appellant, v. Inez Liben, Also Known as Inez Berlin, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 17
Pages: 149–150

Head Matter:
Andrew Sattalich, Appellant, v. Inez Liben, Also Known as Inez Berlin, Respondent.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
February 5, 1959.
Robert Meers for appellant.
Tingar \& Liven for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
A civil suit though groundless and ill motivated does not give rise to a cause of action for its prosecution.
The orders should be reversed, with $10 costs, and motion to dismiss the second counterclaim in the answer granted.
Concur — Heoht, J. P., Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ.
Orders reversed, etc.