Case Name: Charlotte GREENBARG, Appellant, v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-05-11
Citations: 618 So. 2d 760
Docket Number: No. 92-2643
Parties: Charlotte GREENBARG, Appellant, v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, Appellee.
Judges: Before BASKIN, JORGENSON and GODERICH, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 618
Pages: 760–760

Head Matter:
Charlotte GREENBARG, Appellant, v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, Appellee.
No. 92-2643.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 11, 1993.
Fitzgerald, Charlip, Delagado, Befeler & Portuondo and David Charlip, Miami, for appellant.
Robert A. Ginsburg, County Atty., and R.A. Cuevas, Jr., Asst. County Atty., for appellee.
Before BASKIN, JORGENSON and GODERICH, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the final summary judgment in favor of Metropolitan Dade County Board of County Commissioners for two reasons. First, we find that the public was provided reasonable notice of the Board meeting, and the public hearing, § 166.041, Fla.Stat. (1989); § 125.001, Fla.Stat. (1989); see Yarbrough v. Young, 462 So.2d 515 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); second, we find no impropriety in the Board continuing its meeting until the early morning hours. See State ex rel. Walden v. Vanosdal, 131 Ind. 388, 31 N.E. 79 (1892).
Affirmed.