Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeffrey RICKMAN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-06-19
Citations: 185 F. App'x 679
Docket Number: No. 05-30312
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jeffrey RICKMAN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: FERNANDEZ, KLEINFELD, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 185
Pages: 679–680

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jeffrey RICKMAN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-30312.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 12, 2006.
Decided June 19, 2006.
Kurt Alme, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Billings, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Michael Donahue, Federal Defenders of Montana, Helena, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: FERNANDEZ, KLEINFELD, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Jeffrey Rickman appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 42-month sentence for mail fraud and money laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341 and 1957.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Rickman has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief was filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no grounds for relief. Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.