Case Name: James Dow VANDIVERE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patricia R. STANSBERRY, Warden of FCC Petersburg Medium, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-09-02
Citations: 332 F. App'x 26
Docket Number: No. 09-6615
Parties: James Dow VANDIVERE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patricia R. STANSBERRY, Warden of FCC Petersburg Medium, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 332
Pages: 26–26

Head Matter:
James Dow VANDIVERE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patricia R. STANSBERRY, Warden of FCC Petersburg Medium, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 09-6615.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 26, 2009.
Decided: Sept. 2, 2009.
James Dow Vandivere, Appellant Pro Se.
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James Dow Vandivere, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition and the district court's order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Vandivere v. Stansberry, No. 2:09-cv-00037-JBF-TEM, (E.D. Va. Feb. 6, 2009 & March 16, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.