Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Luis BARRIOS-BELTRAN, also known as Jose L. Barrios, also known as Jose Luiz Barrios, also known as Jose Barrios-Beltran, also known as Jose Luis Barrios Beltran, also known as Jose Luis Beltran, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-04-29
Citations: 647 F. App'x 374
Docket Number: No. 15-20233
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Luis BARRIOS-BELTRAN, also known as Jose L. Barrios, also known as Jose Luiz Barrios, also known as Jose Barrios-Beltran, also known as Jose Luis Barrios Beltran, also known as Jose Luis Beltran, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 647
Pages: 374–375

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Luis BARRIOS-BELTRAN, also known as Jose L. Barrios, also known as Jose Luiz Barrios, also known as Jose Barrios-Beltran, also known as Jose Luis Barrios Beltran, also known as Jose Luis Beltran, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-20233
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 29, 2016.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, H. Michael Sokolow, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Luis Barrios-Beltran has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Barrios-Beltran has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Barrios-Beltran's response. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th CiR. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cm. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cm. R. 47.5.4.