Case Name: Kirtis LEWIS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2015-12-08
Citations: 486 S.W.3d 382
Docket Number: No. ED 102548
Parties: Kirtis LEWIS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before Lisa S. Van Amburg, C.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 486
Pages: 382–383

Head Matter:
Kirtis LEWIS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 102548
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
Filed: December 8, 2015
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied February 11, 2016
Application for Transfer Denied May 3, 2016
Kevin B. Gau, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for Movant/Ap-pellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for Respondent/Respondent.
Before Lisa S. Van Amburg, C.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Kirtis Lewis appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Brooks v. State, 242 S.W.3d 705, 708 (Mo.banc 2008). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. Mo. R. Crim. P. 2013.