Case Name: Donald O. KING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1978-02-03
Citations: 354 So. 2d 944
Docket Number: No. 77-697
Parties: Donald O. KING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: HOBSON, Acting C. J., and OTT and DANAHY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 354
Pages: 944–944

Head Matter:
Donald O. KING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 77-697.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Feb. 3, 1978.
Jack 0. Johnson, Public Defender, Bar-tow, and Stephen 0. Rushing, Asst. Public Defender, and Stephannie DaCosta, Legal Intern, Tampa, for appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert J. Landry, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the judgment of the trial court. However we agree with appellant that there are imperfections in his judgment and sentence. The present sentence does not specify the amount of credit for time served as Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1975), requires. Brooks v. State, 349 So.2d 794 (Fla.2d DCA 1977). Moreover, the phrase "at hard labor" in the sentence is improper. Brooks v. State, supra. Finally, the judgment states that appellant entered a plea of guilty to the charge when in fact a jury found him guilty. We remand the case for correction of judgment and sentence, and appellant need not be present at that time.
HOBSON, Acting C. J., and OTT and DANAHY, JJ., concur.