Case Name: Wilfred LUECKE, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Donald HECK, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-02-21
Citations: 892 S.W.2d 824
Docket Number: No. 66133
Parties: Wilfred LUECKE, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Donald HECK, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 892
Pages: 824–825

Head Matter:
Wilfred LUECKE, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Donald HECK, Defendant/Appellant.
No. 66133.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Feb. 21, 1995.
James L. Thomas, Waynesville, for appellant.
Wilfred Luecke, pro se.
Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals from the trial court's order which dismissed his "Trial De Novo . for failure to prosecute" and reinstated a previous judgment in favor of plaintiff as to plaintiffs claim and defendant's counterclaim. We affirm. No error of law appears and an extended opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).