Case Name: Gregory RICE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Richard BENNETT, Clerk, Defendant - Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-09-24
Citations: 294 F. App'x 47
Docket Number: No. 08-7029
Parties: Gregory RICE, Plaintiff — Appellant, v. Richard BENNETT, Clerk, Defendant — Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 294
Pages: 47–48

Head Matter:
Gregory RICE, Plaintiff — Appellant, v. Richard BENNETT, Clerk, Defendant — Appellee.
No. 08-7029.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 16, 2008.
Decided: Sept. 24, 2008.
Gregory Rice, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Gregory Rice appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rice v. Bennett, No. 8:08-cv-01015-PJM (D. Md. filed June 2, 2008 & entered June 3, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.