Case Name: APEX PRINTER ROLLER COMPANY, Appellant, v. BELTSERVICE CORPORATION, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1988-06-21
Citations: 752 S.W.2d 480
Docket Number: No. 53649
Parties: APEX PRINTER ROLLER COMPANY, Appellant, v. BELTSERVICE CORPORATION, Respondent.
Judges: All Judges concur.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 752
Pages: 480–481

Head Matter:
APEX PRINTER ROLLER COMPANY, Appellant, v. BELTSERVICE CORPORATION, Respondent.
No. 53649.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
June 21, 1988.
Robert M. Hunt, St. Louis, for appellant.
James E. Robertson, St. Louis, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a St. Louis County Circuit Court judgment of $36,994.57 with costs for goods sold and delivered. We affirm.
In reviewing a court-tried case under Buie 73.01, we give due deference to the trial court on the issue of the credibility of witnesses, and we must affirm the judgment unless "there is no substantial evidence to support it, unless it is against the weight of the evidence, unless it erroneously declares the law, or unless it erroneously applies the law." Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).
We have reviewed the pleadings and the trial transcript and conclude that there was substantial evidence to support the judgment. No error of law appears and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
All Judges concur.