Case Name: Donald BRASLOFF, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Paul BEHRENS, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-09-27
Citations: 172 S.W.3d 475
Docket Number: No. ED 85855
Parties: Donald BRASLOFF, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Paul BEHRENS, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J. and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J. and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 172
Pages: 475–475

Head Matter:
Donald BRASLOFF, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Paul BEHRENS, Defendant/Respondent.
No. ED 85855.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Sept. 27, 2005.
Natalia McKinstry, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Matthew J. Sauter, Sauter Sullivan & Evans LLC; St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J. and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J. and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Donald Brasloff (Plaintiff) appeals from the trial court's order and judgment granting Paul Behrens' (Defendant) Motion for Summary Judgment (summary judgment) as to Count TV and Count Y of Plaintiffs petition in favor of Defendant and rendering all other pending motions moot. We affirm the trial court's judgment.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).