Case Name: JOSEPH HIRSCHBERG, RESPONDENT, v. BENJAMIN FLUSSER, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1918-10-11
Citations: 92 N.J.L. 515
Docket Number: 
Parties: JOSEPH HIRSCHBERG, RESPONDENT, v. BENJAMIN FLUSSER, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 92
Pages: 515–515

Head Matter:
JOSEPH HIRSCHBERG, RESPONDENT, v. BENJAMIN FLUSSER, APPELLANT.
Submitted July 8, 1918
Decided October 11, 1918.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 91 N. J. L. 66.
Eor the appellant, Samuel Roessler.
Eor the respondent, Philip J. Schotland.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner. JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.