Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alejandro OLIVER-LOZANO, Also Known as Alejandro Oliver, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-02-15
Citations: 633 F. App'x 285
Docket Number: No. 15-41049
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alejandro OLIVER-LOZANO, Also Known as Alejandro Oliver, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before REÁVLEY, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 633
Pages: 285–286

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alejandro OLIVER-LOZANO, Also Known as Alejandro Oliver, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-41049
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Feb. 15, 2016.
William Richardson Tatum, Esq., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Sherman, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Aejandro Oliver-Lozano, Washington, MS, pro se.
Denise S. Benson, Esq., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Defender’s Office, Sherman, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before REÁVLEY, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Alejandro Oliver-Lozano has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Oliver-Lozano has filed a response.
The record is not sufficiently developed for a fair evaluation of Oliver-Lozano's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, as to which we express no view. We decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir.2014).
We have examined counsel's brief, relevant portions of the record reflected therein, and Oliver-Lozano's response. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R, 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.