Case Name: Charles L. YOUNG, Petitioner, v. Walter COLBATH, et al., Respondents
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-03-21
Citations: 559 So. 2d 1217
Docket Number: No. 90-0622
Parties: Charles L. YOUNG, Petitioner, v. Walter COLBATH, et al., Respondents.
Judges: DOWNEY, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 559
Pages: 1217–1217

Head Matter:
Charles L. YOUNG, Petitioner, v. Walter COLBATH, et al., Respondents.
No. 90-0622.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
March 21, 1990.
Rehearing Denied April 12, 1990.
Charles L. Young, West Palm Beach, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Patricia G. Lampert, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By order dated March 9, 1990, this court determined that the pleading filed by petitioner, entitled petition for writ of prohibition, should be treated as a petition for writ of mandamus. Now upon further consideration of the pro se petition, as amended, and the response, we are of the opinion that correctly the petition should be denominated as petition for writ of prohibition and, accordingly, that part of the order dated March 9, 1990, providing otherwise is hereby rescinded.
The amended petition of writ of prohibition is
DENIED.
DOWNEY, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.