Case Name: Jay PICKARD, Appellant, v. CITY OF VERO BEACH, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-12-15
Citations: 629 So. 2d 957
Docket Number: No. 93-2240
Parties: Jay PICKARD, Appellant, v. CITY OF VERO BEACH, Appellee.
Judges: ANSTEAD, HERSEY and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 629
Pages: 957–957

Head Matter:
Jay PICKARD, Appellant, v. CITY OF VERO BEACH, Appellee.
No. 93-2240.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Dec. 15, 1993.
J. Curtis Boyd of Fee, Bryan & Koblegard, P.A., Fort Pierce, for appellant/Jay Pickard.
Benjamin S. Gross, Asst. City Atty., Vero Beach, for appellee/City of Vero Beach.

Opinion:
FASTRACK APPEAL
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court's entry of summary judgment holding that appellant's vehicle was subject to forfeiture after appellant used the vehicle to travel to a drug store to pick up an illegal drug prescription. See Duckham v. State, 478 So.2d 347 (Fla.1985); In re Forfeiture of 1986 Ford PU, 619 So.2d 337 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). However, the parties agree the appellant is still entitled to have the trial court consider his claim that a forfeiture would violate the prohibition on excessive fines contained in the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution. See Austin v. United States, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 2801, 125 L.Ed.2d 488 (1993). We agree.
Accordingly, we affirm in part and reverse in part and remand for further proceedings consistent herewith.
ANSTEAD, HERSEY and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.