Case Name: Samuel PAUDA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-01-06
Citations: 647 So. 2d 1077
Docket Number: Nos. 94-1076, 94-1077
Parties: Samuel PAUDA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: COBB and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 647
Pages: 1077–1078

Head Matter:
Samuel PAUDA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Nos. 94-1076, 94-1077.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Jan. 6, 1995.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and James T. Cook, Asst. Public Defender, Day-tona Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Ann M. Childs, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
DAUKSCH, Judge.
This is an appeal from a sentence wherein appellant was given improper consecutive enhanced sentences. Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993), cert. den., — U.S.—, 115 S.Ct. 278, 130 L.Ed.2d 195 (1994); Brooks v. State, 630 So.2d 527 (Fla.1993); Horn v. State, 642 So.2d 1209 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). Without giving notice, the appellant, over his objection, was required to pay a public defender "lien." See Fontenont v. State, 631 So.2d 379 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Jones v. State, 623 So.2d 627 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Smith v. State, 622 So.2d 638 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). Appellee confesses error by "acknowledging the holdings" of the pertinent case law.
SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.
COBB and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.