Case Name: MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Milliet K. LANHAM, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-06-27
Citations: 187 F. App'x 277
Docket Number: No. 05-2329
Parties: MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Milliet K. LANHAM, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 187
Pages: 277–278

Head Matter:
MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Milliet K. LANHAM, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-2329.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 31, 2006.
Decided: June 27, 2006.
Scott B. Elkind, Elkind & Shea, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Appellant. Nell B. Strachan, Venable, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Milliet K. Lanham appeals the district court's orders granting summary judgment against her in this civil action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act and denying her motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Lanham, No. CA-04-3868-WDQ (D. Md. Sept. 19 & Oct. 27, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED