Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. George McMahon, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1998-02-02
Citations: 247 A.D.2d 409
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v George McMahon, Appellant.
Judges: Sullivan, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Florio, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 247
Pages: 409–410

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v George McMahon, Appellant.
[668 NYS2d 470]

Opinion:
Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Orange County (Berry, J.), both rendered April 1, 1996, convicting him of attempted burglary in the second degree, under Indictment Nos. 94-00578 and 94-00579 (one count under each indictment) upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences. The appeals bring up for review the denial by the same court, after a hearing held in the County Court, Sullivan County (Kane, J.), of those branches of the defendant's omnibus motions which were to suppress physical evidence.
Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.
The defendant failed to establish a reasonable expectation of privacy in the property that was the subject of the search. Therefore, he is without standing to contest the validity of that search and the resulting seizure of physical evidence found inside the subject premises (see, People v Ponder, 54 NY2d 160; People v Crisano, 247 AD2d 403 [decided herewith]).
In view of the foregoing, we have no occasion to consider the defendant's remaining contentions.
Sullivan, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Florio, JJ., concur.