Case Name: Diane FUNFAR & others v. TOWN OF FALMOUTH & another.
Court: Massachusetts Appeals Court
Jurisdiction: Massachusetts
Decision Date: 2018-04-27
Citations: 103 N.E.3d 772
Docket Number: 17–P–1048
Parties: Diane FUNFAR & others
v.
TOWN OF FALMOUTH & another.
Judges: 
Reporter: North Eastern Reporter 3d
Volume: 103
Pages: 772–772

Head Matter:
Diane FUNFAR & others
v.
TOWN OF FALMOUTH & another.
17-P-1048
Appeals Court of Massachusetts.
Entered: April 27, 2018.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28
Barry Funfar and Linda Ohkagawa.
Falmouth zoning board of appeals.

Opinion:
The plaintiffs brought this case pursuant to G. L. c. 40A, § 17, challenging a decision of the Falmouth zoning board of appeals (ZBA), and seeking an order temporarily ceasing the operation of a wind turbine known as "Wind 2." Summary judgment entered in the defendants' favor, in part under the doctrine of laches. In a separate case, Falmouth v. Falmouth Zoning Bd. of Appeals, No. 1472CV00003 (Barnstable County), a different judge of the Superior Court affirmed the ZBA's decision that Wind 2 (and its sister turbine, Wind 1) constitute a nuisance, and permanently ordered that the turbines cease operation. That decision was not appealed and has become final. As a result, the relief sought by the plaintiffs in this case has already been obtained. We accordingly vacate the judgment in this case, and order the entry of a new judgment dismissing this case as moot. See Aquacultural Research Corp. v. Austin, 88 Mass. App. Ct. 631, 636 (2015).
So ordered.
Vacated.