Case Name: James Guy ARNOLD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joshua L. JARRELL, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-03-25
Citations: 61 F. App'x 79
Docket Number: No. 02-7829
Parties: James Guy ARNOLD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joshua L. JARRELL, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 61
Pages: 79–80

Head Matter:
James Guy ARNOLD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joshua L. JARRELL, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 02-7829.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 20, 2003.
Decided March 25, 2003.
James Guy Arnold, Appellant Pro Se. Linda S. Woolf, Kristen Nichole Nesbitt, Goodell, Devries, Leech & Gray, L.L.P., Baltimore, MD, for Appellee.
Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
James Guy Arnold appeals the district court's order denying relief on his civil action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) and 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Arnold v. Jarrell, No. CA-01-3570 (D.Md. Nov. 12, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.