Case Name: In the Matter of Naomi Roxann Young, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. NAOMI ROXANN YOUNG, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2006-05-31
Citations: 206 Or. App. 229
Docket Number: 0506-66659; A129328
Parties: In the Matter of Naomi Roxann Young, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. NAOMI ROXANN YOUNG, Appellant.
Judges: Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Sehuman and Ortega, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 206
Pages: 229–230

Head Matter:
Submitted on record and briefs April 7,
reversed May 31, 2006
In the Matter of Naomi Roxann Young, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. NAOMI ROXANN YOUNG, Appellant.
0506-66659; A129328
136 P3d 76
Lance D. Perdue filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Stacey RJ Guise, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Sehuman and Ortega, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
In this mental commitment case, appellant contends that the evidence in the record is insufficient to establish that she is presently unable to provide for her own basic needs because of her mental disorder. ORS 426.005(l)(d). The state concedes that the evidence does not establish the grounds for the order of commitment that was entered in this case. On de novo review, we agree and accept the concession.
Reversed.