Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jean Ronel DOR, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-03-04
Citations: 313 F. App'x 596
Docket Number: No. 08-6903
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jean Ronel DOR, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 313
Pages: 596–597

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jean Ronel DOR, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-6903.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 26, 2009.
Decided: March 4, 2009.
Brian Joseph Kornbrath, Federal Public Defender, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellant. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorneys, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jean Ronel Dor appeals the district court's order granting in part and denying in part his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion and no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Dor, No. 3:04-cr-00067-JPB-DJJ-1 (N.D.W.Va. May 28, 2008); see United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247, 257 (4th Cir.2009). We deny Dor's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED