Case Name: RETTA J. PEMBERTON v. CHARLES B. COPPOCK et al.
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1928-04-03
Citations: 125 Or. 315
Docket Number: 
Parties: RETTA J. PEMBERTON v. CHARLES B. COPPOCK et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 125
Pages: 315–315

Head Matter:
(Argued March 26,
affirmed April 3,
rehearing denied May 22, 1928.
RETTA J. PEMBERTON v. CHARLES B. COPPOCK et al.
(265 Pac. 1117.)
For appellant there was a brief over the name of Mr. John H. McNary, with an oral argument by Mr. William H. Trindle.
For respondent there was a brief and oral arguments by Mr. Guy 0. Smith and Mr. Walter G. Wins-low.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have considered all of the points raised by appellant as well as the testimony offered by the parties. From consideration of the law and the testimony we are of the unanimous opinion that error was not committed.
The decree is affirmed. Aeeirmed.