Case Name: DADE COUNTY, Florida, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, and Urban J. Albury, William A. Daniel, John D. Ferguson, Vernon C. Holloway, Francis Lavigne, John M. Monahan, Richard R. Peeples, John D. Shires, Jr., Harold A. Silvers, as and constituting the duly appointed and acting Board of Electrical Examiners in and for Dade County, Florida, Petitioners, v. STATE of Florida ex rel. Harry GREENBERG, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1961-01-18
Citations: 126 So. 2d 147
Docket Number: 
Parties: DADE COUNTY, Florida, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, and Urban J. Albury, William A. Daniel, John D. Ferguson, Vernon C. Holloway, Francis Lavigne, John M. Monahan, Richard R. Peeples, John D. Shires, Jr., Harold A. Silvers, as and constituting the duly appointed and acting Board of Electrical Examiners in and for Dade County, Florida, Petitioners, v. STATE of Florida ex rel. Harry GREENBERG, Respondent.
Judges: THOMAS, C. J., and TERRELL, HOB-SON, ROBERTS, and DREW, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 126
Pages: 147–147

Head Matter:
DADE COUNTY, Florida, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, and Urban J. Albury, William A. Daniel, John D. Ferguson, Vernon C. Holloway, Francis Lavigne, John M. Monahan, Richard R. Peeples, John D. Shires, Jr., Harold A. Silvers, as and constituting the duly appointed and acting Board of Electrical Examiners in and for Dade County, Florida, Petitioners, v. STATE of Florida ex rel. Harry GREENBERG, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Jan. 18, 1961.
Darrey A. Davis and William G. Dreis-bach, Miami, for petitioners.
R. K. Bell, Miami, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We noted probable jurisdiction of this cause and set the case for argument on the questions of jurisdiction and the merits. Upon further consideration of the matter after hearing oral argument, we are of the view that the subject decision of the District Court of Appeal, 120 So.2d 625, is not in direct conflict with any decision of another District Court of Appeal or of this Court on the same point or points of law, and that, therefore, the writ of cer-tiorari heretofore granted was improvidently issued.
Writ of certiorari quashed.
THOMAS, C. J., and TERRELL, HOB-SON, ROBERTS, and DREW, JJ., concur.