Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerry Lee IMES, Jr., Defendant Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1996-07-05
Citations: 91 F.3d 1210
Docket Number: No. 95-30025
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerry Lee IMES, Jr., Defendant Appellant.
Judges: Before: FLETCHER, NOONAN, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 91
Pages: 1210–1211

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerry Lee IMES, Jr., Defendant Appellant.
No. 95-30025.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
July 5, 1996.

Opinion:
ORDER
Before: FLETCHER, NOONAN, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
The opinion and dissent filed April 5,1996, slip op. 4175, and reported at 80 F.3d 1309 (9th Cir.1996), are withdrawn in light of the parties' agreement that the conviction should be vacated because the jury was erroneously instructed. A memorandum disposition is filed in their place, and the petition for re hearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc are dismissed as moot.