Case Name: Wilbur GLASS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-07-25
Citations: 30 S.W.3d 190
Docket Number: No. ED 76642
Parties: Wilbur GLASS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER, III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 30
Pages: 190–191

Head Matter:
Wilbur GLASS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 76642.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
July 25, 2000.
Annette Llewellyn, Asst. Sp. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Gregory L. Barnes, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER, III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Wilbur Glass, ("appellant"), appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after a hearing. Appellant previously appealed his Rule 24.035 motion after it was denied without a hearing. We reversed and remanded for an evidentiary hearing in Glass v. State, 957 S.W.2d 483 (Mo.App.E.D.1997). The motion court again denied his motion after the mandated hearing. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our deci sion. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).