Case Name: Michael David August DURRANT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-03-08
Citations: 752 So. 2d 131
Docket Number: No. 3D99-2391
Parties: Michael David August DURRANT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before JORGENSON, COPE, and LEVY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 752
Pages: 131–132

Head Matter:
Michael David August DURRANT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D99-2391.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 8, 2000.
Michael David August Durrant, in proper person.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before JORGENSON, COPE, and LEVY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We concur with appellate counsel that treatment of this appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), is appropriate in this case. By pro se brief appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence on count four. Assuming this challenge had been made with particularity in the trial court by motion for judgment of acquittal (it was not), it is nonetheless without merit. The evidence was legally sufficient to go to the jury. See State v. Law, 559 So.2d 187 (Fla.1989).
Affirmed.