Case Name: Patricia HUELSMANN, Employee/Appellant, v. DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION, Employer/Respondent, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri, Custodian for the Second Injury Fund, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1994-09-27
Citations: 883 S.W.2d 578
Docket Number: No. 65574
Parties: Patricia HUELSMANN, Employee/Appellant, v. DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION, Employer/Respondent, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri, Custodian for the Second Injury Fund, Respondent.
Judges: Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 883
Pages: 578–578

Head Matter:
Patricia HUELSMANN, Employee/Appellant, v. DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION, Employer/Respondent, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri, Custodian for the Second Injury Fund, Respondent.
No. 65574.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Sept. 27, 1994.
Carla G. McBride, Kessler & Kessler, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Vicky L. Anthony, Asst. Atty. Gen., Cape Girardeau, for respondent.
Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Claimant appeals the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) denying her claim against employer and the Second Injury Fund. We affirm. The award of the Commission is supported by substantial and competent evidence. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.-16(b).