Case Name: James Dennis GRAY, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Susan Ann GRAY, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2013-02-13
Citations: 391 S.W.3d 911
Docket Number: No. ED 98135
Parties: James Dennis GRAY, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Susan Ann GRAY, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and LISA VAN AMBURG, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 391
Pages: 911–911

Head Matter:
James Dennis GRAY, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Susan Ann GRAY, Defendant/Respondent.
No. ED 98135.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Feb. 13, 2013.
Heidi Casey Speath, Clayton, MO, for appellant.
James E. Robertson, Clayton, MO, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and LISA VAN AMBURG, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff appeals from an adverse judgment in a court-tried case. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).