Case Name: RUBY PINKNEY AND MICHELLE PINKNEY, APPELLANTS-APPELLANTS, v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF INSTITUTIONS AND AGENCIES, DIVISION OF WELFARE, ET AL., RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1975-04-15
Citations: 68 N.J. 178
Docket Number: 
Parties: RUBY PINKNEY AND MICHELLE PINKNEY, APPELLANTS-APPELLANTS, v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF INSTITUTIONS AND AGENCIES, DIVISION OF WELFARE, ET AL., RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 68
Pages: 178–178

Head Matter:
RUBY PINKNEY AND MICHELLE PINKNEY, APPELLANTS-APPELLANTS, v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF INSTITUTIONS AND AGENCIES, DIVISION OF WELFARE, ET AL., RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.
Argued April 15, 1975
Decided April 15, 1975.
Mr. Alan S. Ziegler argued the cause for appellants, (Mr. Donald W. Buff, Newark Legal Services, attorney.)
Mr. Stephen Slcillman, Assistant Attorney General, and Mr. Francis P. Meehan, counsel for Essex County Welfare Board, argued the cause for respondents, (Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney.)

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The dismissal by the Appellate Division is vacated, and the matter is remanded for a "fair hearing" before the Division of Public Welfare during the week of April 28, 1975. The matter is to be accelerated for argument before the Appellate Division after the "fair hearing" before the Division of Public Welfare.
For remandmenl — Justices Mountain, Sullivan, Pashman, Clifford and Schreiber and Judge Conford — 6.
Opposed — None.