Case Name: James L. BLUM, Respondent, v. Joe RAMBLER and Mary L. Rambler a.k.a. Mary Blum, a.k.a. Mary Rambler-Blum, a.k.a. Mariah Newell, Appellants
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-09-27
Citations: 172 S.W.3d 500
Docket Number: No. WD 64394
Parties: James L. BLUM, Respondent, v. Joe RAMBLER and Mary L. Rambler a.k.a. Mary Blum, a.k.a. Mary Rambler-Blum, a.k.a. Mariah Newell, Appellants.
Judges: Before RONALD R. HOLLIGER, P.J., ROBERT G. ULRICH and JOSEPH M. ELLIS, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 172
Pages: 500–501

Head Matter:
James L. BLUM, Respondent, v. Joe RAMBLER and Mary L. Rambler a.k.a. Mary Blum, a.k.a. Mary Rambler-Blum, a.k.a. Mariah Newell, Appellants.
No. WD 64394.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Sept. 27, 2005.
John A. Lozano, Harrisonville, MO, for Appellants.
Lynn K. Ballew, Harrisonville, MO, for Respondent.
Before RONALD R. HOLLIGER, P.J., ROBERT G. ULRICH and JOSEPH M. ELLIS, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Joe and Mary Rambler appeal the judgment of the trial court in favor of James Blum on his claims for declaratory judgment, partnership dissolution, and accounting. They contend that the trial court's findings that farm real estate and other real estate and personal property were partnership property and were acquired by the partnership was contrary to the parties' written partnership agreement and violated section 358.080. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).