Case Name: Chad BROWN, Eric Lowe, T. Zenon Pharmaceuticals LLC, d.b.a. Pharmacy Matters, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF FLORIDA, INC., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-02-06
Citations: 456 F. App'x 854
Docket Number: No. 11-14013
Parties: Chad BROWN, Eric Lowe, T. Zenon Pharmaceuticals LLC, d.b.a. Pharmacy Matters, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF FLORIDA, INC., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 456
Pages: 854–855

Head Matter:
Chad BROWN, Eric Lowe, T. Zenon Pharmaceuticals LLC, d.b.a. Pharmacy Matters, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF FLORIDA, INC., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-14013
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Feb. 6, 2012.
Anthony Paduano, Jordan D. Becker, Paduano & Weintraub LLP, New York, NY, Craig D. Stein, Stein & Stein, Palm Beach, FL, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
Timothy J. Conner, Jennifer A. Mansfield, Holland & Knight, LLP, Jacksonville, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The district court, in a comprehensive order dated August 8, 2011, granted appel-lee's motion to stay this action under the Colorado Rivet! doctrine pending the final disposition of an action in an Iowa state court in which appellant Pharmacy Matters, a mail-order pharmacy, is seeking payment for blood factors it provided appellants Brown and Lowe — the same pay ment it seeks to recover in this lawsuit. Appellants appeal the stay order, arguing that the district court abused its discretion in granting the stay; that is, it applied the Colorado River factors erroneously and the facts it found with respect to those factors are clearly erroneous.
We disagree. The August 8 order demonstrates that the district court correctly applied the Colorado River factors and that the findings of fact it made with respect to the factors is supported by the record. Hence, granting the stay did not constitute an abuse of discretion.
AFFIRMED.
. See Colorado River Water Conseivation Dist. v. United States, 424 U.S. 800, 96 S.Ct. 1236, 47 L.Ed.2d 483 (1976).