Case Name: STATE OF NEVADA, On Relation of Its BOARD OF PAROLE COMMISSIONERS, Appellant, v. THE HONORABLE SEYMORE BROWN, Police Judge, Municipal Court, In and For the City of Las Vegas, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada
Jurisdiction: Nevada
Decision Date: 1976-10-28
Citations: 92 Nev. 602
Docket Number: No. 8982
Parties: STATE OF NEVADA, On Relation of Its BOARD OF PAROLE COMMISSIONERS, Appellant, v. THE HONORABLE SEYMORE BROWN, Police Judge, Municipal Court, In and For the City of Las Vegas, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Nevada Reports
Volume: 92
Pages: 602–603

Head Matter:
STATE OF NEVADA, On Relation of Its BOARD OF PAROLE COMMISSIONERS, Appellant, v. THE HONORABLE SEYMORE BROWN, Police Judge, Municipal Court, In and For the City of Las Vegas, Respondent.
No. 8982
October 28, 1976
555 P.2d 846
Robert List, Attorney General, and David B. Small, Deputy Attorney General, Carson City, for Appellant.
' Carl E. Lovell, City Attorney, and Gerald Welt, Deputy City Attorney, Las Vegas, for Respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION
Per Curiam:
Under the Rules of Appellate Procedure, respondent was required to serve and file his answering brief on or before October 17, 1976. The brief was neither filed within the allotted time nor has any explanation been tendered for respondent's failure to comply with the requirements of the rules.
Accordingly, under the authority of, and for the same reasons stated in, Kitchen Factors, Inc. v. Brown, 91 Nev. 308, 535 P.2d 677 (1975), we elect to treat the omission as a confession of error.
The order of the district court is reversed and we remand this proceeding to the district court with instructions to grant appellant's petition for the extraordinary writ of mandamus to compel respondent to dismiss misdemeanor charges in cause No. 21181, styled: "City of Las Vegas v. Hampton."