Case Name: George W. MOSHER, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-08-19
Citations: 113 S.W.3d 239
Docket Number: No. ED 81794
Parties: George W. MOSHER, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., and MARY R. RUSSELL, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 113
Pages: 239–240

Head Matter:
George W. MOSHER, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 81794.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Aug. 19, 2003.
Ellen H. Flottmann, Lawrence Pratt, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
John Munson Morris III, Richard A. Starnes, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., and MARY R. RUSSELL, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
George W. Mosher, Jr., ("Movant"), appeals the order denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without a hearing. Movant asserts his counsel was ineffective because he failed to present Movant's medical records to prove his emotional status or his social security records to prove his financial status to the sentencing court.
We have reviewed the parties' briefs and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.085(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. However, we have provided the parties with a memorandum, for their use only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).