Case Name: Adrienne S. VANCE; Hollis Vance, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-02-04
Citations: 410 F. App'x 591
Docket Number: No. 09-1813
Parties: Adrienne S. VANCE; Hollis Vance, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before AGEE, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 410
Pages: 591–591

Head Matter:
Adrienne S. VANCE; Hollis Vance, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 09-1813.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 19, 2011.
Decided: Feb. 4, 2011.
Harry A. Smith, III, McNeer Highland McMunn & Varner L.C., Elkins, West Virginia, for Appellants. Renatha S. Garner, MacCorkle Lavender & Sweeney PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia; Heather M. Noel, MacCorkle Lavender & Sweeney PLLC, Morgantown, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before AGEE, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Adrienne S. Vance and Hollis Vance appeal the district court's order granting summary judgment to Defendant in this negligence action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Vance v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., No. 2:07-cv-00101-JPB-JSK (N.D. W.Va. June 17, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.