Case Name: The State ex rel. Sharon, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellee and Cross-Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1998-07-08
Citations: 82 Ohio St. 3d 330
Docket Number: No. 95-2036
Parties: The State ex rel. Sharon, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellee and Cross-Appellant.
Judges: Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 82
Pages: 330–332

Head Matter:
The State ex rel. Sharon, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellee and Cross-Appellant.
[Cite as State ex rel. Sharon v. Indus. Comm. (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 330.]
(No. 95-2036
Submitted May 12, 1998
Decided July 8, 1998.)
Hochman & Roach Co., L.P.A., Gary D. Plunkett and Theresa M. Muhic, for appellant and cross-appellee.
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Steven P. Fixler, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee and cross-appellant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
On authority of State ex rel. Fultz v. Indus. Comm. (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 327, 631 N.E.2d 1057, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.