Case Name: Ernesto POUX, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FCI BENNETTSVILLE SC, SSLT Mailroom; FCI Bennettsville SC, Shu Officers; FCI Bennettsville SC, C Unit Manager; J. Edwards, Lt.; S. Morrison, Lt.; Ms. T. Lewis, Lt.; D. Hudson, Lt.; MS. S. Cartwright; John Does, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-03-18
Citations: 418 F. App'x 157
Docket Number: No. 10-7675
Parties: Ernesto POUX, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FCI BENNETTSVILLE SC, SSLT Mailroom; FCI Bennettsville SC, Shu Officers; FCI Bennettsville SC, C Unit Manager; J. Edwards, Lt.; S. Morrison, Lt.; Ms. T. Lewis, Lt.; D. Hudson, Lt.; MS. S. Cartwright; John Does, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 418
Pages: 157–157

Head Matter:
Ernesto POUX, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FCI BENNETTSVILLE SC, SSLT Mailroom; FCI Bennettsville SC, Shu Officers; FCI Bennettsville SC, C Unit Manager; J. Edwards, Lt.; S. Morrison, Lt.; Ms. T. Lewis, Lt.; D. Hudson, Lt.; MS. S. Cartwright; John Does, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 10-7675.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 15, 2011.
Decided: March 18, 2011.
Ernesto Poux, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ernesto Poux, Jr. seeks to appeal the district court's text order entered November 19, 2010, granting Defendants' motion to stay discovery. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Poux seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.