Case Name: Tamika BEVERLY, Claimant/Respondent, v. MAY CREDIT CENTER, Employer/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-12-18
Citations: 62 S.W.3d 729
Docket Number: No. ED 79527
Parties: Tamika BEVERLY, Claimant/Respondent, v. MAY CREDIT CENTER, Employer/Appellant.
Judges: Before GEORGE W. DRAPER III, P.J. and MARY R. RUSSELL, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 62
Pages: 729–729

Head Matter:
Tamika BEVERLY, Claimant/Respondent, v. MAY CREDIT CENTER, Employer/Appellant.
No. ED 79527.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Dec. 18, 2001.
Shelley A. Wilson, Simon & Early, P.C., St. Louis, MO, attorney for appellant.
Ray B. Marglous, St. Louis, MO, attorney for respondent.
Before GEORGE W. DRAPER III, P.J. and MARY R. RUSSELL, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, May Gredit Center (Employer), appeals from the final award of the Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) in this workers' compensation case. Employer contests the Commission's finding that Tamika Beverly sustained a 7.5 percent body as a whole permanent partial disability.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the Commission did not abuse its discretion. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).