Case Name: Fred E. CHRISTIAN, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. ST. LOUIS BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS, et al., Defendants/Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2013-02-13
Citations: 391 S.W.3d 915
Docket Number: No. ED 98469
Parties: Fred E. CHRISTIAN, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. ST. LOUIS BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS, et al. Defendants/Respondents.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J„ and LISA S. VAN AMBURG, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 391
Pages: 915–916

Head Matter:
Fred E. CHRISTIAN, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. ST. LOUIS BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS, et al. Defendants/Respondents.
No. ED 98469.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Feb. 13, 2013.
Frederick E. Christian, St. Louis, MO, pro se.
Karin Krohn Schute, St. Louis, MO, Gloria Jean Loyd Rose, Co-Counsel, Clayton, MO, for Respondents.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J„ and LISA S. VAN AMBURG, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Fred E. Christian (Christian) appeals pro se from the judgment granting the motion of the St. Louis Board of Police Commissioners, et. al. (Board) for Judgment on the Pleadings, or, Alternatively, for Summary Judgment and dismissing Christian's cause of action with prejudice. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).