Case Name: George B. WATSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1997-11-21
Citations: 702 So. 2d 584
Docket Number: No. 96-01517
Parties: George B. WATSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: PARKER, C.J., and PATTERSON and BLUE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 702
Pages: 584–584

Head Matter:
George B. WATSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 96-01517.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Nov. 21, 1997.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Allyn Giambalvo, Assistant Public Defender, Clearwater, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robert J. Krauss, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Ap-pelleel

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this appeal filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), the public defender has suggested that the trial court erred by accepting George B. Watson's guilty plea because of a possible double jeopardy issue. Watson waived his right to direct appeal by failing to make an express reservation of the right to appeal the double jeopardy issue. See Ford v. State, 556 So.2d 483, 484 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). We note that Watson can raise this issue by collateral review. See id.
Accordingly, we affirm without prejudice to Watson to raise the double jeopardy issue by collateral review.
PARKER, C.J., and PATTERSON and BLUE, JJ., concur.