Case Name: MATLOCK v. MATLOCK
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1915-07-13
Citations: 77 Or. 50
Docket Number: 
Parties: MATLOCK v. MATLOCK.
Judges: Mr. Justice Harris took no part in the consideration of this cause.
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 77
Pages: 50–51

Head Matter:
Rehearing granted November 14, 1914, reargued February 15,
former opinion sustained July 13, 1915.
(See 72 Or. 330.)
MATLOCK v. MATLOCK.
(150 Pac. 261.)
From Lane: Lawrence T. Harris, Judge.
For appellant there was a brief over the names of Mr. J. M. Pipes, Mr. Lark Bilyeu, and Messrs. Woodcock & Smith, with oral arguments by Mr. Pipes and Mr. Bilyeu.
For respondent there was a brief over the names of Mr. W. H. Wilson and Messrs. Thompson & Hardy, with oral arguments by Mr. Wilson and Mr. C. A. Hardy.
Department 1.

Opinion:
Opinion
Per Curiam.
A rehearing of this canse was granted, but upon a reconsideration of the question involved we conclude the former opinion should be adhered to; and it is so ordered. Former Opinion Sustained.
Mr. Justice Harris took no part in the consideration of this cause.