Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Angel Rafael HERNANDEZ-AMAYA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-10-22
Citations: 617 F. App'x 370
Docket Number: No. 15-40440
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Angel Rafael HERNANDEZ-AMAYA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 617
Pages: 370–371

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Angel Rafael HERNANDEZ-AMAYA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-40440
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Oct. 22, 2015.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, H. Michael Sokolow, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Angel Rafael Hernandez-Amaya raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Rodriguez, 711 F.3d 541, 562-63 & n. 28 (5th Cir.2013) (en banc), in which we held that the generic, contemporary definition of "sexual abuse of a minor" does not require a four-year age-differential between the victim and the perpetrator. He also raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Elizondo-Hernandez, 756 F.3d 779, 781-82 (5th Cir.2014), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 135 S.Ct. 1011, 190 L.Ed.2d 881 (2015), which held that the Texas offense of indecency with a child by contact satisfied the generic definition of "sexual abuse of minor." Accordingly, the motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.