Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George BENNETT, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-08-05
Citations: 42 F. App'x 626
Docket Number: No. 02-6578
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George BENNETT, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 42
Pages: 626–626

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George BENNETT, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-6578.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 25, 2002.
Decided Aug. 5, 2002.
George Bennett, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin H. White, Jr., Office of the United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
George Bennett appeals the district court's order denying his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)(2) (West 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Bennett, No. CR-94-189 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 27, 2002). We deny Bennett's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.