Case Name: HALL v. SWART
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1912-03-11
Citations: 193 F. 1020
Docket Number: No. 1,082
Parties: HALL v. SWART.
Judges: Before PRITCHARD, Circuit Judge, and DAYTON and ROSE, District Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter
Volume: 193
Pages: 1020–1020

Head Matter:
HALL v. SWART.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
March 11, 1912.)
No. 1,082.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Frank S. Appleman (Arden Howell, on the brief), for appellant.
Frederick S. Stitt (R. S. & A. B. Lacey, on the brief), for appellee.
Before PRITCHARD, Circuit Judge, and DAYTON and ROSE, District Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellant was complainant below. She said that the appellee had infringed claim 6 of letters patent No. 730.647, issued June 9, 1903, to Haynie and Halí. The learned judge below dismissed her bill. He held that, in view of the prior art, the combination described in the claim in question was without patentable novelty. We are of the same opinion. Affirmed.