Case Name: WOODROW A. TURNQUIST, d.b.a. W-S METAL STAMPING COMPANY, v. MALCO PRODUCTS, INC.
Court: Minnesota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Minnesota
Decision Date: 1973-05-25
Citations: 296 Minn. 521
Docket Number: No. 43602
Parties: WOODROW A. TURNQUIST, d.b.a. W-S METAL STAMPING COMPANY, v. MALCO PRODUCTS, INC.
Judges: Heard before Knutson, C. J., and Peterson, Todd, and MacLaughlin, JJ.
Reporter: Minnesota Reports
Volume: 296
Pages: 521–521

Head Matter:
WOODROW A. TURNQUIST, d.b.a. W-S METAL STAMPING COMPANY, v. MALCO PRODUCTS, INC.
207 N. W. 2d 706.
May 25, 1973
No. 43602.
Wangensteen & Associates and Theo. Wangensteen, Jr., for appellant.
Warst, Bundlie, Carroll & Crouch and Donald R. Bundlie, for respondents.
Heard before Knutson, C. J., and Peterson, Todd, and MacLaughlin, JJ.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Plaintiff appeals from a denial of his motion for a new trial on the issue of damages only. He alleges that the trial court improperly failed to submit the issue of future loss of profits to the jury. The jury returned a verdict of $10,000 for plaintiff. We affirm.
We have examined the records and proceedings herein and have considered the issues raised by plaintiff and hold that the trial court properly instructed the jury pursuant to the theory under which the lawsuit was tried and plaintiff was not entitled to an instruction regarding future loss of profits.
Affirmed.