Case Name: Benjamin H. Roth et al., Copartners under the Name of B. H. Roth & Company, Appellants, v. Milton Zaidenberg, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1944-05-19
Citations: 267 A.D. 978
Docket Number: 
Parties: Benjamin H. Roth et al., Copartners under the Name of B. H. Roth & Company, Appellants, v. Milton Zaidenberg, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 267
Pages: 978–978

Head Matter:
(May 19, 1944.)
Benjamin H. Roth et al., Copartners under the Name of B. H. Roth & Company, Appellants, v. Milton Zaidenberg, Respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The evidence adduced, which was uncontradicted, warranted the decision of Special Term in defendant's favor on the first counterclaim. Some of the findings are somewhat inconsistent, and the first and second conclusions of law requested by plaintiffs should not have been allowed. These may be corrected by settlement of the .order with new findings. The interlocutory judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
Martin, P. J., Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ., concur; Untermyer, J., dissents and votes to reverse and grant a new trial.
Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs. Settle order on notice.