Case Name: Charles A. LALIBERTE, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Charles E. SAMUELS, Jr., Director of Bureau of Prisons; Christopher Nickrenz, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-12-02
Citations: 670 F. App'x 910
Docket Number: No. 16-2497
Parties: Charles A. LALIBERTE, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Charles E. SAMUELS, Jr., Director of Bureau of Prisons; Christopher Nickrenz, Defendants-Appellees
Judges: Before SHEPHERD, ARNOLD, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 670
Pages: 910–910

Head Matter:
Charles A. LALIBERTE, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Charles E. SAMUELS, Jr., Director of Bureau of Prisons; Christopher Nickrenz, Defendants-Appellees
No. 16-2497
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: November 29, 2016
Filed: December 2, 2016
Charles A. LaLiberte, Kansas City, MO, pro se.
Jeffrey P. Ray, Asst. U.S, Atty., Kansas City, MO (Tammy Dickinson, U.S. Atty., on the brief), for appellees
Before SHEPHERD, ARNOLD, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Charles LaLiberte appeals after the district court dismissed his pro se complaint. Upon careful review, we find no reason to reverse the dismissal order because, among other reasons, we agree with the district court that it had no personal jurisdiction over defendants. See World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson, 444 U.S. 286, 291-92, 100 S.Ct. 669, 62 L.Ed.2d 490 (1980) (nonresident defendant must have minimum contacts such that suit "does not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice"); Miller v. Nippon Carbon Co., 528 F.3d 1087, 1090-91 (8th Cir. 2008) (de novo review). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Stephen R. Bough, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.