Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 1215 LITTLE CREEK ROAD, Chester, Maryland 21619, with all buildings, appurtenances, and improvements thereon, Defendant, v. Lamont Vincent Pollard, Claimant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-02-20
Citations: 218 F. App'x 252
Docket Number: No. 06-1813
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. 1215 LITTLE CREEK ROAD, Chester, Maryland 21619, with all buildings, appurtenances, and improvements thereon, Defendant, v. Lamont Vincent Pollard, Claimant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 218
Pages: 252–252

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. 1215 LITTLE CREEK ROAD, Chester, Maryland 21619, with all buildings, appurtenances, and improvements thereon, Defendant, v. Lamont Vincent Pollard, Claimant—Appellant.
No. 06-1813.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 15, 2007.
Decided: Feb. 20, 2007.
Lamont Vincent Pollard, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Charles Kay, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Lamont Vincent Pollard appeals the district court's order granting the Government's motion for summary judgment, finding certain real property subject to forfeiture, and the court's order denying Pollard's motion to stay and to alter/amend judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Pollard, No. 1:05-cv-01531-CCB (D. Md. Feb. 28, 2006; June 26, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.