Case Name: Adi Miriama NAYADA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-12-06
Citations: 22 F. App'x 844
Docket Number: No. 00-71336; I & NS No. A71-949-145
Parties: Adi Miriama NAYADA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 22
Pages: 844–845

Head Matter:
Adi Miriama NAYADA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.
No. 00-71336.
I & NS No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Oct. 10, 2001.
Decided Dec. 6, 2001.
Before PREGERSON and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and WEINER, Senior District Judge.
The Honorable Charles Weiner, Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Petitioner Nayada ("Nayada") petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") decision affirming the Immigration Judge's ("IJ") denial of her application for asylum. Nayada's evidence of past persecution includes a single incident of police questioning regarding her political affiliation, and villagers telling her father of threats of rape against Nayada. Nayada has failed to present evidence of past persecution or fear of future persecution sufficient to compel a finding contrary to that of the IJ. See Chebchoub v. I.N.S., 257 F.3d 1038, 1042 (9th Cir.2001).
PETITION DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.