Case Name: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. David FRYE, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1997-10-02
Citations: 699 So. 2d 1010
Docket Number: No. 90047
Parties: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. David FRYE, Respondent.
Judges: KOGAN, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, HARDING and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 699
Pages: 1010–1010

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. David FRYE, Respondent.
No. 90047.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Oct. 2, 1997.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Lara J. Edelstein, Assistant Attorney General, Fort Lauderdale, for Petitioner.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Kenneth P. Speiller, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have for review Frye v. State, 690 So.2d 629 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997), which expressly and directly conflicts with White v. State, 618 So.2d 354 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Sims v. State, 605 So.2d 997 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); and Martin v. State, 608 So.2d 571 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. In accordance with our decision in State v. Hudson, 698 So.2d 831 (Fla.1997), we approve the decision below.
KOGAN, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, HARDING and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.
WELLS, J., dissents with an opinion in which GRIMES, J., concurs.