Case Name: SAGAMORE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Lonnell WALKER, Sr., d/b/a Walker Insurance Agency, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-03-19
Citations: 70 S.W.3d 631
Docket Number: No. ED 79301
Parties: SAGAMORE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Lonnell WALKER, Sr., d/b/a Walker Insurance Agency, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before GEORGE W. DRAPER III, P.J. and MARY R. RUSSELL, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 70
Pages: 631–632

Head Matter:
SAGAMORE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Lonnell WALKER, Sr., d/b/a Walker Insurance Agency, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 79301.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
March 19, 2002.
Randall J. Reinker, Jennifer R. Piper, Kruse, Reinker & Hamilton, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
John E. Toma, Jr., Richard L. Saville, Jr., St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before GEORGE W. DRAPER III, P.J. and MARY R. RUSSELL, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Lonnell Walker, Sr., d/b/a Walker Insurance Agency (Walker) appeals the trial court's judgment granting Respondent, Sagamore Insurance Company's (Sagamore) motion to enforce settlement.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).