Case Name: Anthony Lee McNAIR, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Chiquita R. Bryant, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF WILMINGTON, Defendant-Appellee; Anthony L. McNair, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. City of Rocky Mount Police Department; City of Rocky Mount, Defendants-Appellees; Anthony L. McNair, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. S.C. Hicks; N.B. Newsome; C. Lawance; Robert A. Evan, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-05-02
Citations: 520 F. App'x 220
Docket Number: Nos. 13-1293, 13-1307, 13-1308
Parties: Anthony Lee McNAIR, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Chiquita R. Bryant, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF WILMINGTON, Defendant-Appellee. Anthony L. McNair, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. City of Rocky Mount Police Department; City of Rocky Mount, Defendants-Appellees. Anthony L. McNair, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. S.C. Hicks; N.B. Newsome; C. Lawance; Robert A. Evan, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 520
Pages: 220–220

Head Matter:
Anthony Lee McNAIR, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Chiquita R. Bryant, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF WILMINGTON, Defendant-Appellee. Anthony L. McNair, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. City of Rocky Mount Police Department; City of Rocky Mount, Defendants-Appellees. Anthony L. McNair, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. S.C. Hicks; N.B. Newsome; C. Lawance; Robert A. Evan, Defendants-Appellees.
Nos. 13-1293, 13-1307, 13-1308.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 22, 2013.
Decided: May 2, 2013.
Anthony Lee McNair, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Anthony Lee McNair appeals the district court's orders adopting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaints under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McNair v. City of Wilmington, No. 4:12-cv-00276-FL (E.D.N.C. Feb. 27, 2013); McNair v. City of Rocky Mount Police Dep't, No. 4:12-cv-00275-FL (E.D.N.C. Feb. 27, 2013); McNair v. Hicks, No. 4:12-CV-00274-FL (E.D.N.C. Feb. 27, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.