Case Name: Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. De Forest Radio Telephone & Telegraph Co.; and Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. et al. v. United States et al.
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1928-10-29
Citations: 278 U.S. 562
Docket Number: No. 35; No. 36
Parties: Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. De Forest Radio Telephone & Telegraph Co.; and Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. et al. v. United States et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 278
Pages: 562–562

Head Matter:
No. 35.
No. 36.
Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. De Forest Radio Telephone & Telegraph Co.; and Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. et al. v. United States et al.
Argued October 18, 19, 1928.
Decided October 29, 1928.
Mr. Frederick H. Wood, with whom Messrs. Drury W. Cooper, Thomas Ewing, and Alfred McCormack were, on the brief, for petitioners.
Mr. Charles E. Hughes, with whom Messrs. Thomas G. Haight, Samuel E. Darby, Jr., and William B. Ballard were- on the brief, for respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
Affirmed on the authority of Morgan v. Daniels, 153 U. S. 120; Victor Talking Machine Co. v. Brunswick Balke Collender Co., 273 U. S. 670.