Case Name: Clarence LYLES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Willie SCOTT, Warden; Gaddy Lassiter; S. Knight, Health Administrator; Wayne H. Calabrese, Defendants-Appellees, and Wackenhut Correctional Corporation, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-10-06
Citations: 202 F. App'x 632
Docket Number: No. 06-6552
Parties: Clarence LYLES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Willie SCOTT, Warden; Gaddy Lassiter; S. Knight, Health Administrator; Wayne H. Calabrese, Defendants-Appellees, and Wackenhut Correctional Corporation, Defendant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 202
Pages: 632–633

Head Matter:
Clarence LYLES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Willie SCOTT, Warden; Gaddy Lassiter; S. Knight, Health Administrator; Wayne H. Calabrese, Defendants-Appellees, and Wackenhut Correctional Corporation, Defendant.
No. 06-6552.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 28, 2006.
Decided: Oct. 6, 2006.
Clarence Lyles, Appellant Pro Se. James Redfern Morgan, Jr., Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, P.L.L.C., Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Clarence Lyles appeals the district court's order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Holly v. Scott, 434 F.3d 287 (4th Cir.2006) (Bivens action may not be brought against individual officers in a privately-run federal correctional facility such as Rivers Correctional Institution). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order dismissing Lyles' complaint. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.