Case Name: J. B. Brintnell, Appellant, vs. H. T. Eckles and Mary D. Eckles, his wife, Appellees
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1931-02-06
Citations: 101 Fla. 816
Docket Number: 
Parties: J. B. Brintnell, Appellant, vs. H. T. Eckles and Mary D. Eckles, his wife, Appellees.
Judges: Strum, C.J., and . Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J.J., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 101
Pages: 816–816

Head Matter:
J. B. Brintnell, Appellant, vs. H. T. Eckles and Mary D. Eckles, his wife, Appellees.
En Banc.
Decision filed February 6, 1931.
Petition for rehearing denied February 27, 1931.
Collins, Collins & Lmnpkin, for Appellant;
Frank L. Butts, for Appellees.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This is a motion to advance for early consideration and disposition. It does not come within the rule to advance but by its terms it may be treated as a motion to quash. It is so treated and is granted on authority of Norfleet Holding Company vs. Price, filed February 5, 1931.
Strum, C.J., and . Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J.J., concur.