Case Name: Thomas GODFREY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1987-05-12
Citations: 506 So. 2d 1158
Docket Number: No. 85-1849
Parties: Thomas GODFREY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, BASKIN, and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 506
Pages: 1158–1158

Head Matter:
Thomas GODFREY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 85-1849.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 12, 1987.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Marti Rothenberg, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Michael J. Neimand, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before BARKDULL, BASKIN, and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the order of the trial court requiring restitution since it is apparent from the record that restitution was not contemplated by the plea agreement. See G.H. v. State, 414 So.2d 1135, 1137 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); see also Pollock v. Bryson, 450 So.2d 1183 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984) (where plea agreement contemplated the restitution ordered, defendant is estopped from raising alleged illegality of the condition); Dent v. State, 432 So.2d 163 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (same).
Reversed.