Case Name: Adam A. JAMISON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harold DEE (Commissioner's Disciplinary Hearing Officer for the New York State Dept. of Corr. Serv.); Donald Selsky, Dir. Sec. Housing, N.Y.S. Dept. of Corr. Services (Appeals Disciplinary Officer of NYS Dept. of Corr. Services), Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-02-20
Citations: 4 F. App'x 81
Docket Number: No. 00-0186
Parties: Adam A. JAMISON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harold DEE (Commissioner's Disciplinary Hearing Officer for the New York State Dept. of Corr. Serv.); Donald Selsky, Dir. Sec. Housing, N.Y.S. Dept. of Corr. Services (Appeals Disciplinary Officer of NYS Dept. of Corr. Services), Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Present KEARSE, LEVAL and KATZMANN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 4
Pages: 81–81

Head Matter:
Adam A. JAMISON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harold DEE (Commissioner's Disciplinary Hearing Officer for the New York State Dept. of Corr. Serv.); Donald Selsky, Dir. Sec. Housing, N.Y.S. Dept. of Corr. Services (Appeals Disciplinary Officer of NYS Dept. of Corr. Services), Defendants-Appellees.
No. 00-0186.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Feb. 20, 2001.
Adam A. Jamison, Collins, NY, pro se.
Ann P. Zybert, Ass’t Sol. Gen., N.Y., NY, for appellees.
Present KEARSE, LEVAL and KATZMANN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
SUMMARY ORDER
This cause came on to be heard on the record from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and was submitted by plaintiff pro se and by counsel for defendants.
ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is now hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of said District Court be and it hereby is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Stein's Opinion and Order dated April 26, 2000.
We have considered all of plaintiffs contentions on this appeal and have found them to be without merit. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.