Case Name: William HILL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS FOR the EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA; Chuck Rosenberg; T.S. Ellis, III; E. Blair Brown; Elizabeth Suarez, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-10-09
Citations: 249 F. App'x 977
Docket Number: No. 07-6229
Parties: William HILL, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS FOR the EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA; Chuck Rosenberg; T.S. Ellis, III; E. Blair Brown; Elizabeth Suarez, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 249
Pages: 977–978

Head Matter:
William HILL, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS FOR the EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA; Chuck Rosenberg; T.S. Ellis, III; E. Blair Brown; Elizabeth Suarez, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 07-6229.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 21, 2007.
Decided: Oct. 9, 2007.
William Hill, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
William Hill appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hill v. United States Attorneys for the Eastern Dist. of Va., No. l:07-cv-00052-LMB (E.D.Va. Jan. 30, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.