Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Julio Rodriguez, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2013-08-27
Citations: 21 N.Y.3d 1030
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Julio Rodriguez, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 21
Pages: 1030–1032

Head Matter:
[995 NE2d 178, 972 NYS2d 215]
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Julio Rodriguez, Appellant.
Decided August 27, 2013
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York City (Lisa A. Packard of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York City (Patricia Curran of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.
Defendant failed to preserve his claim that he did not receive 20 days' notice prior to his sex offender designation proceeding as required under Correction Law § 168-n (3). His argument that an adjournment of unspecified duration was required as a matter of due process is similarly unreviewable.
Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.