Case Name: Janice Ann REBHAN, Appellant, v. Thomas E. REYNOLDS, D.D.S., P.A., and Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-12-07
Citations: 570 So. 2d 1120
Docket Number: No. 90-01237
Parties: Janice Ann REBHAN, Appellant, v. Thomas E. REYNOLDS, D.D.S., P.A., and Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, Appellees.
Judges: LEHAN, A.C.J., and HALL and PARKER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 570
Pages: 1120–1120

Head Matter:
Janice Ann REBHAN, Appellant, v. Thomas E. REYNOLDS, D.D.S., P.A., and Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, Appellees.
No. 90-01237.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Dec. 7, 1990.
Janice Ann Rebhan, pro se.
Geri Atkinson-Hazelton, Gen. Counsel, Unemployment Appeals Com’n, Tallahassee, for appellee Unemployment Appeals Com’n.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the decision of the Unemployment Appeals Commission which upheld the decision of the appeals referee denying unemployment benefits to appellant. There was a substantial conflict in the evidence presented which the appeals referee resolved in favor of the employer. While appellant disputed the employer's evidence on the issues of misconduct, this court cannot substitute its judgment for that of the appeals referee on disputed issues of fact. See Kinlaw v. Unemployment Appeals Commission, 417 So.2d 802 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982). Therefore, the order appealed from is affirmed.
LEHAN, A.C.J., and HALL and PARKER, JJ., concur.