Case Name: Oscar SYGER, Appellant, v. Moises KRIGER, Appellee.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2019-03-13
Citations: 271 So. 3d 136
Docket Number: No. 3D18-0450
Parties: Oscar SYGER, Appellant,
v.
Moises KRIGER, Appellee.
Judges: Before SALTER, and MILLER, JJ., and LEBAN, Senior Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 271
Pages: 136–137

Head Matter:
Oscar SYGER, Appellant,
v.
Moises KRIGER, Appellee.
No. 3D18-0450
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Opinion filed March 13, 2019
Arthur J. Morburger, Miami, for appellant.
Kluger, Kaplan, Silverman, Katzen & Levine, P.L., Jason R. Marks, Miami and Ashley P. Frankel, for appellee.
Before SALTER, and MILLER, JJ., and LEBAN, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Valdes v. GAB Robins N. Am., Inc., 924 So.2d 862, 866 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) ("It is axiomatic that a plaintiff in a malicious prosecution case must, as an essential element of that cause of action, establish that the prior litigation giving rise to the malicious prosecution suit ended with a 'bona fide termination' in that party's favor.") (quoting Doss v. Bank of Am., N.A., 857 So.2d 991, 994 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) ); see also Union Oil of Cal., Amsco Div. v. Watson, 468 So.2d 349, 353 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) ("Where dismissal is on technical grounds, for procedural reasons, or any other reason not inconsistent with the guilt of the accused, it does not constitute a favorable termination.").