Case Name: EHIK v. PIPER; and vice versa
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1970-09-25
Citations: 122 Ga. App. 499
Docket Number: 45338, 45343
Parties: EHIK v. PIPER; and vice versa.
Judges: Hall, P. J., Deen and Evans, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 122
Pages: 499–499

Head Matter:
45338, 45343.
EHIK v. PIPER; and vice versa.
Argued May 6, 1970
Decided September 25, 1970.
Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy, Eugene G. Partain, E. A. Simpson, Jr., for appellant.
Murphy, McFarland & Turoff, Martin McFarland, for appellee.

Opinion:
Per curiam.
These appeals are from orders denying a motion for summary judgment filed by both the plaintiff and the defendant. The trial judge certified that the orders should be subject to review. Plaintiff sued for damages growing out of a collision between the automobile he was driving and an automobile driven by the son of the defendant.
There being a genuine issue on one or more material facts, the trial court did not err in overruling both motions for summary judgment.
Judgments affirmed.
Hall, P. J., Deen and Evans, JJ., concur.