Case Name: Garland P. PARLIER, et ux., et al., Appellants, v. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-05-28
Citations: 622 So. 2d 479
Docket Number: Nos. 91-18 to 91-20, 91-22 to 91-28 and 91-30
Parties: Garland P. PARLIER, et ux., et al., Appellants, v. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Appellees.
Judges: GRIFFIN, J., and POUND, F.R. Jr., Associate Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 622
Pages: 479–481

Head Matter:
Garland P. PARLIER, et ux., et al., Appellants, v. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Appellees.
Nos. 91-18 to 91-20, 91-22 to 91-28 and 91-30.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
May 28, 1993.
Opinion Granting Rehearing Aug. 20, 1993.
Patrice A. Talisman and David B. Paku-la, of Robles & Gonzales, and Daniels & Talisman, P.A., Miami, for appellants.
Robert A. Hannah and Henry W. Jewett, II of Hannah, Marsee, Beik & Yoght, Orlando, for appellee, Owens-Illinois, Inc.
Timothy Clark of Law Office of Timothy Clark, Miami, Ronnie H. Walker of Ronnie H. Walker, P.A., Orlando, for appellee, U.S. Mineral Products Co.
Jonathan C. Hollingshead and Susan B. Collingwood of Fisher, Rushmer, Werren-rath, Keiner, Wack & Dickson, P.A., Orlando, for appellee, W.R. Grace & Co.
Wendy F. Lumish and Amy M. Uber of Rumberger, Kirk, Caldwell, Cabaniss, Burke & Wechsler, Miami, for appellee, Foster Wheeler Corp.
M. Stephen Smith and Marie P. Monte-fusco of Rumberger, Kirk, Caldwell, Ca- baniss, Burke & Wechsler, Miami, for ap-pellee, Anchor Packing Co.
James E. Tribble of Blackwell & Walker, P.A., Miami, for appellee, Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp.
Louise H. McMurray, Stephens, Lynn, Klein & McNicholas, P.A., of Louise H. McMurray, P.A., Miami, arííl Susan J. Cole, of Blair & Cole, P.A., Coral Gables, for appellees Pittsburgh Corning Corp., Fibre-board Corp. and Keene Corp.
No Appearance for appellee, Eagle-Picher.

Opinion:
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT
HARRIS, Judge.
In accordance with W.R. Grace & Co.— Connecticut v. Parlier, 614 So.2d 500 (Fla.1993), this cause is remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings consistent therewith, including consideration of whether some of appellees waived reliance on the 120 day rule in Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.070(j) by failing to raise the defense in their responsive pleadings or motions.
REMANDED for further proceedings.
GRIFFIN, J., and POUND, F.R. Jr., Associate Judge, concur.