Case Name: Larry D. ELLIS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2008-01-15
Citations: 244 S.W.3d 197
Docket Number: No. ED 89563
Parties: Larry D. ELLIS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 244
Pages: 197–198

Head Matter:
Larry D. ELLIS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 89563.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Jan. 15, 2008.
S. Kristina Starke, Saint Louis, MO, for movant/appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Evan J. Buchheim, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent/respondent.
Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Larry D. Ellis appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 29.15 postcon-viction relief motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. White v. State, 57 S.W.3d 341, 343 (Mo.App. E.D.2001). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).