Case Name: MARIE SCHNITZIUS v. FISHER PAPER BOX COMPANY
Court: Minnesota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Minnesota
Decision Date: 1909-05-28
Citations: 108 Minn. 522
Docket Number: Nos. 16,097—(116)
Parties: MARIE SCHNITZIUS v. FISHER PAPER BOX COMPANY.
Judges: 
Reporter: Minnesota Reports
Volume: 108
Pages: 522–522

Head Matter:
MARIE SCHNITZIUS v. FISHER PAPER BOX COMPANY.
May 28, 1909.
Nos. 16,097—(116).
Action in the district court for Hennepin county to recover $5,050 damages for injuries received while working in defendant’s factory. The answer stated that the injuries were caused by plaintiff’s negligence or the negligence of a fellow servant. The case was tried before Holt, J., who directed a verdict in favor of defendant. Prom an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, she appealed.
Affirmed.
Bdward M. Bash and Dodge é Tautges, for appellant.
Price Wichersham, for respondent.
Reported in 121 N. W. 1134.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Action for personal injuries, in which, after plaintiff had rested her case, the court directed a verdict for defendant, and plaintiff appealed from an order denying a new trial. A careful examination of the record discloses no evidence of negligence on the part of defendant, and the action of the court below was therefore proper. A discussion of the evidence would serve no useful purpose as a precedent, and we content ourselves with the statement that it has been fully considered with the result stated. The rule of res ipsa loquitur has no application to the facts presented.
Order affirmed.