Case Name: STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. BRYAN HINDMAN, Defendant
Court: Montana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Montana
Decision Date: 2009-08-06
Citations: 354 Mont. 52
Docket Number: CAUSE NO. DC-06-434
Parties: STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. BRYAN HINDMAN, Defendant,
Judges: Chairperson, Hon. Stewart Stadler, Member, Hon. Blair Jones and Member, Richard Simonton.
Reporter: Montana Reports
Volume: 354
Pages: 52–53

Head Matter:
From: The District Court of the 4th Judicial District. County of Missoula.
STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. BRYAN HINDMAN, Defendant,
CAUSE NO. DC-06-434 DECISION

Opinion:
On January 28, 2009, the defendant was sentenced for violation of the conditions of a suspended sentence to a commitment to the Department of Corrections for a term of eighteen (18) years, with fourteen (14) years, six (6) months suspended, for the offense of Sexual Assault, a felony. The Court recommends that Defendant be placed in a Sexual Offender Treatment Program as soon as possible followed by a Pre-Release Program that is not located in the Missoula area.
On August 6, 2009, the defendant's application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
The defendant was present and was represented by Ethan Lerman. The state was not represented.
Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.
Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that "the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive." (§46-18-904(3), MCA).
The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.
Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.
Done in open Court this 6th day of August, 2009.
DATED this 20th day of August, 2009.
Chairperson, Hon. Stewart Stadler, Member, Hon. Blair Jones and Member, Richard Simonton.