Case Name: WALNUT STREET ASSOCIATES, INC., Petitioner v. BROKERAGE CONCEPTS, INC. and Kimberly Macrone, Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2010-03-12
Citations: 990 A.2d 724
Docket Number: 
Parties: WALNUT STREET ASSOCIATES, INC., Petitioner v. BROKERAGE CONCEPTS, INC. and Kimberly Macrone, Respondents.
Judges: Justice ORIE MELVIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 990
Pages: 724–725

Head Matter:
WALNUT STREET ASSOCIATES, INC., Petitioner v. BROKERAGE CONCEPTS, INC. and Kimberly Macrone, Respondents.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
March 12, 2010.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 12th day of March 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:
Did the Superior Court err in adopting and applying Restatement (Second) of Torts § 772(a), and holding that truthful statements could not form the basis of a claim for tortious interference with contractual relations?
Justice ORIE MELVIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.