Case Name: RAMON ARTURO ESCALDERON, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2009-06-17
Citations: 229 Or. App. 174
Docket Number: A134364
Parties: RAMON ARTURO ESCALDERON, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent.
Judges: Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Brewer, Chief Judge, and Sercombe, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 229
Pages: 174–175

Head Matter:
On petitioner’s petition for reconsideration filed April 29, and respondent’s response to petition for reconsideration filed May 7,
reconsideration allowed; prior disposition (227 Or App 506, 206 P3d 286) adhered to June 17, 2009
RAMON ARTURO ESCALDERON, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent.
Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision
A134364
210 P3d 929
Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, and Elizabeth Corbridge Ranweiler, Deputy Public Defender, Legal Services Division, Office of Public Defense Services, for petition.
John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Jerome Lidz, Solicitor General, and Kristen G. Williams, Assistant Attorney General, for response.
Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Brewer, Chief Judge, and Sercombe, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Petitioner seeks reconsideration of our decision in Escalderon v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision, 227 Or App 506, 206 P3d 286 (2009), asserting that we improperly awarded costs to respondent. We allow reconsideration and, based on Blacknall v. Board of Parole, 223 Or App 294, 196 P3d 20 (2008), rev allowed, 346 Or 65 (2009), adhere to the original result in this case.
Reconsideration allowed; prior disposition adhered to.