Case Name: Lawrence Putnick et al., Respondents, v. H.M.C. Associates et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, and Electronic Business Systems Corporation, Appellant, et al., Defendants. Turner Telecommunications System Corporation, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant, et al., Third-Party Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1993-10-21
Citations: 197 A.D.2d 763
Docket Number: 
Parties: Lawrence Putnick et al., Respondents, v H.M.C. Associates et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, and Electronic Business Systems Corporation, Appellant, et al., Defendants. Turner Telecommunications System Corporation, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant, et al., Third-Party Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 197
Pages: 763–763

Head Matter:
Lawrence Putnick et al., Respondents, v H.M.C. Associates et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, and Electronic Business Systems Corporation, Appellant, et al., Defendants. Turner Telecommunications System Corporation, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant, et al., Third-Party Defendants.
[602 NYS2d 727]

Opinion:
—Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Conway, J.), entered July 31, 1992 in Albany County, which, inter alia, granted plaintiffs' motion to confirm/restore this matter to the trial calendar.
We affirm. Plaintiffs have conceded that this matter was in fact struck from the trial calendar in January 1991 and, based upon our review of the record as a whole, we are unable to conclude that Supreme Court abused its discretion in restoring it.
Weiss, P. J., Mikoll, Yesawich Jr. and Crew III, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.