Case Name: STATE of Louisiana, Appellee, v. George J. ALEXANDER, Appellant
Court: Louisiana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1976-03-29
Citations: 329 So. 2d 181
Docket Number: No. 57213
Parties: STATE of Louisiana, Appellee, v. George J. ALEXANDER, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 329
Pages: 181–181

Head Matter:
STATE of Louisiana, Appellee, v. George J. ALEXANDER, Appellant.
No. 57213.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
March 29, 1976.
Philip E. O’Neill, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, Kenner, for defendant-appellant.
William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Connick, Dist. Atty., Louise S. Korns, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

Opinion:
TATE, Justice.
The defendant was convicted of simple burglary, La.R.S. 14:62, and sentenced to four years at hard labor. He appeals.
No assignments of error were made in the trial court. In the absence of an assignment of error filed in the trial court within the time specified or continued by the trial judge, La.C.Cr.P. arts. 844 (1974), 916 (1974), this court's review is limited to error discoverable by inspection of the pleadings and proceedings and without reference to the evidence. La.C.Cr.P. art. 920 (1974); State v. Shillow, 310 So.2d 102 (La. 1975). Our examination of the record discloses no such patent error.
Accordingly, we affirm the conviction and sentence.
AFFIRMED.
. By brief, we are informed that no objections were made during the trial. Furthermore, as the minutes show, written motions to suppress evidence, confession, and identification were withdrawn when the State informed the court that it had no physical evidence, statements, or identification testimony. An assignment of error must be based on an objection made at the time of occurrence or upon the trial court's ruling on a written motion. See La.C.Cr.P. art. 841 (1974).