Case Name: HEINZE et al. v. SUPERIOR TRANSPORT CO.
Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1950-12-06
Citations: 96 F. Supp. 479
Docket Number: Civ. No. 6359
Parties: HEINZE et al. v. SUPERIOR TRANSPORT CO.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Supplement
Volume: 96
Pages: 479–479

Head Matter:
HEINZE et al. v. SUPERIOR TRANSPORT CO.
Civ. No. 6359.
United States District Court N. D. Ohio, W. D.
Dec. 6, 1950.
Marshall, Melhorn, Bloch & Belt, Toledo, Ohio, for plaintiffs.
Zachman, Boxell & Torbet, Toledo, Ohio, Smith, Klein & Blumberg, Toledo, Ohio, for defendant.

Opinion:
KLOEB, District Judge.
The motion of the defendant for an order requiring a more definite statement of the claim of plaintiff is overruled as to all specifications therein.
It appears to the Court that the complaint fairly and fully discloses a cause of action, and that the matters inquired into in the motion more properly constitute evidence that may become known to the defendant through the application of one or more of the methods of discovery provided in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.
An order is drawn accordingly.