Case Name: In re Johnny Lee GORE, a/k/a Manager, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-04-23
Citations: 519 F. App'x 154
Docket Number: No. 13-1357
Parties: In re Johnny Lee GORE, a/k/a Manager, Petitioner.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 519
Pages: 154–155

Head Matter:
In re Johnny Lee GORE, a/k/a Manager, Petitioner.
No. 13-1357.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 18, 2013.
Decided: April 23, 2013.
Johnny Lee Gore, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Johnny Lee Gore petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district court to rule on a motion filed March 26, 2002, during the course of Gore's criminal proceedings. Gore was eventually convicted and a judgment was entered November 20, 2002. We conclude that Gore is not entitled to mandamus relief.
Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402, 96 S.Ct. 2119, 48 L.Ed.2d 725 (1976); United States v. Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir.1988).
The relief sought by Gore is not available by way of mandamus, as his criminal case is closed. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.