Case Name: Michael PEREZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2013-09-18
Citations: 122 So. 3d 429
Docket Number: No. 3D11-3250
Parties: Michael PEREZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SHEPHERD, C.J., and WELLS and LAGOA, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 122
Pages: 429–429

Head Matter:
Michael PEREZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D11-3250.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Sept. 18, 2013.
Opinion on Rehearing Oct. 9, 2013.
Michael Perez, in proper person.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Joanne Diez, Assistant Attorney General, for petitioner.
Before SHEPHERD, C.J., and WELLS and LAGOA, JJ.

Opinion:
ON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of Petitioner's Motion, we certify the following question to our supreme court as one of great public importance:
HOW SHOULD MANIFEST INJUSTICE BE DEFINED FOR PURPOSES OF A CLAIM OF NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE AFTER A GUILTY PLEA?
Certification granted.
SHEPHERD, C.J., and WELLS and LAGOA, JJ., concur.