Case Name: Shedrick SYKES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2016-06-21
Citations: 492 S.W.3d 630
Docket Number: No. ED 103339
Parties: Shedrick SYKES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Roy L. Richter, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 492
Pages: 630–630

Head Matter:
Shedrick SYKES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 103339
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
FILED: June 21, 2016
Rosalynn Koch, Woodrail Centre, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney . General, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65203, for Respondent.
Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Roy L. Richter, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Shedrick Sykes appeals from the motion court's entry of judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his amended Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. Ño error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this ease would serve no jurisprudential or.precedential purpose. We have, however, provided- a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).