Case Name: Marguerite A. McLaughlin, Respondent, v. George Gushue, Inc., Appellant. Christian Mydland and Regina Sabella, Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1929-12
Citations: 228 A.D. 647
Docket Number: 
Parties: Marguerite A. McLaughlin, Respondent, v. George Gushue, Inc., Appellant. Christian Mydland and Regina Sabella, Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 228
Pages: 647–647

Head Matter:
Marguerite A. McLaughlin, Respondent, v. George Gushue, Inc., Appellant. Christian Mydland and Regina Sabella, Defendants.

Opinion:
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. While plaintiff vyas not entitled to summary judgment under rule 113, the action not being one to recover liquidated damages, it clearly appears that she was entitled to relief under rules 109 and 112,* since the defense was insufficient in law, and in light thereof the denial was sham. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Seeger and Seudder, JJ., concur.