Case Name: Charles HEEGER, Emily Heeger, Albert Heeger, and Ruth Heeger, Appellants, v. Benjamin LAMKE, Ethel Lamke, Daniel Strait, Deborah Strait, Margie Jonell Berger, and Margaret Berger, Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1989-05-23
Citations: 770 S.W.2d 747
Docket Number: No. 55196
Parties: Charles HEEGER, Emily Heeger, Albert Heeger, and Ruth Heeger, Appellants, v. Benjamin LAMKE, Ethel Lamke, Daniel Strait, Deborah Strait, Margie Jonell Berger, and Margaret Berger, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 770
Pages: 747–747

Head Matter:
Charles HEEGER, Emily Heeger, Albert Heeger, and Ruth Heeger, Appellants, v. Benjamin LAMKE, Ethel Lamke, Daniel Strait, Deborah Strait, Margie Jonell Berger, and Margaret Berger, Respondents.
No. 55196.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
May 23, 1989.
Timothy J. Melenbrink, Union, for appellants.
Lamke, Benjamin, Ethel, & Strait, Daniel, Union, for respondents.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from the trial court's judgment in a quiet title action. The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).