Case Name: Roger CLAUSEN, Appellant, v. NORTH CENTRAL BLOOD SERVICES, formerly known as St. Paul Regional Blood Services, a division of the American Red Cross, a foreign corporation; Immanuel-St. Joseph's Hospital, a division of the Mayo Health System, Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-01-09
Citations: 1 F. App'x 566
Docket Number: No. 00-1103
Parties: Roger CLAUSEN, Appellant, v. NORTH CENTRAL BLOOD SERVICES, formerly known as St. Paul Regional Blood Services, a division of the American Red Cross, a foreign corporation; Immanuel-St. Joseph’s Hospital, a division of the Mayo Health System, Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 1
Pages: 566–566

Head Matter:
Roger CLAUSEN, Appellant, v. NORTH CENTRAL BLOOD SERVICES, formerly known as St. Paul Regional Blood Services, a division of the American Red Cross, a foreign corporation; Immanuel-St. Joseph’s Hospital, a division of the Mayo Health System, Appellees.
No. 00-1103.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 28, 2000.
Decided Jan. 9, 2001.
Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, HANSEN, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Roger Clausen appeals from the District Court's grant of summary judgment to defendants in his action against North Central Blood Services and Immanuel-St. Joseph's Hospital under theories of negligence, strict liability, breach of warranty, and negligent misrepresentation.
To establish each of his pleaded claims, Clausen had to demonstrate that contaminated blood was the proximate cause of his injury. After de novo review, we conclude the judgment was proper because the un-controverted evidence clearly demonstrated an absence of causation. See Dulany v. Carnahan, 132 F.3d 1234, 1237 (8th Cir. 1997) (standard of review); Smith v. Brut-ger Co., 569 N.W.2d 408, 423-14 (Minn. 1997) (negligent misrepresentation); Johnson v. Minnesota, 553 N.W.2d 40, 49 (Minn.1996) (negligence); Drager by Gutz-man v. Aluminum Indus. Corp., 495 N.W.2d 879, 882 (Minn.App.1993) (strict products liability); Craft Tool & Die Co. v. Payne, 385 N.W.2d 24, 26 (Minn.App.1986) (breach of warranty). We also conclude the District Court did not abuse its discretion in denying Clausen's motion for a continuance. See Dulany, 132 F.3d at 1238 (standard of review); United States v. Light, 766 F.2d 394, 397-98 (8th Cir. 1985) (per curiam) (nonmoving party must show that opposition is meritorious, and must affirmatively demonstrate how postponement of ruling will enable him to rebut moving party's showing of absence of genuine issue of fact).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Hon. James M. Rosenbaum, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Hon. Franklin L. Noel, Chief Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.