Case Name: John CUTONILLI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of MARYLAND, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-08-28
Citations: 696 F. App'x 648
Docket Number: No. 17-1667
Parties: John CUTONILLI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of MARYLAND, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 696
Pages: 648–648

Head Matter:
John CUTONILLI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of MARYLAND, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 17-1667
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: August 24, 2017
Decided: August 28, 2017
John Cutonilli, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Holdsworth Bowen, Assistant Attorney General, Pikesville, Maryland, for Appel-lee.
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
John Cutonilli appeals the district court's orders denying his motion to amend his complaint and dismissing his claims challenging the legality of the Maryland Firearm Safety Act of 2013, Md. Code Ann., Crim. L. § 4-301 to 4-306 (West 2017), under Maryland's Constitution and the Second and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Cutonilli v. Maryland, No. 1:15-cv-00629-JKB, 251 F.Supp.3d 920, 2017 WL 1364753 (D. Md. Sept. 29, 2015, Apr. 14, 2017, & May 24, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED