Case Name: Mel MARIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Alersia McMANUS, in their personal capacities, jointly and severally; Kate Hetherington, in their personal capacities, jointly and severally; Howard Community College, in their personal capacities, jointly and severally; Allied-Barton, LLC, in their personal capacities, jointly and severally, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-01-07
Citations: 589 F. App'x 158
Docket Number: No. 14-1893
Parties: Mel MARIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Alersia McMANUS, in their personal capacities, jointly and severally; Kate Hetherington, in their personal capacities, jointly and severally; Howard Community College, in their personal capacities, jointly and severally; Allied-Barton, LLC, in their personal capacities, jointly and severally, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before KING, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 589
Pages: 158–159

Head Matter:
Mel MARIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Alersia McMANUS, in their personal capacities, jointly and severally; Kate Hetherington, in their personal capacities, jointly and severally; Howard Community College, in their personal capacities, jointly and severally; Allied-Barton, LLC, in their personal capacities, jointly and severally, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 14-1893.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 22, 2014.
Decided: Jan. 7, 2015.
Mel Marin, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Charles Brousaides, Carney, Kelehan, Bresler, Bennett & Scherr, LLP, Columbia, Maryland; Bruce Darren Burns, Carney, Kelehan, Bresler, Bennett & Scherr, LLP, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before KING, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Mel Marin seeks to appeal the district court's order directing him to provide completed service forms and summons and the court's order dismissing his civil complaint without prejudice for failure to comply with its instructions. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Marin v. McManus, No. 1:14— cv-02014-RDB (D. Md. filed June 30, 2014 & entered July 1,. 2014; July 31, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.