Case Name: June WOMBLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SEABOARD SYSTEM RAILROAD, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1986-11-19
Citations: 804 F.2d 635
Docket Number: No. 86-3402
Parties: June WOMBLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SEABOARD SYSTEM RAILROAD, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 804
Pages: 635–635

Head Matter:
June WOMBLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SEABOARD SYSTEM RAILROAD, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 86-3402
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Nov. 19, 1986.
Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied Dec. 22, 1986.
Kattman, Eshelman & MacLennan, John F. MacLennan, Jacksonville, Fla., for plaintiff-appellant.
Taylor, Moseley & Joyner, James F. Moseley, Jacksonville, Fla., for defendantappellee.
Before GODBOLD, VANCE and JOHNSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The plaintiff-appellant, an employee of the Seaboard System Railroad, defendantappellee, was terminated from her employment in December 1985. She filed a civil action in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida claiming lost wages, insurance benefits, retirement benefits, and the other benefits to which she, as an employee, was entitled. The district court dismissed the case without prejudice holding that a non-union employee, such as the plaintiff, was entitled to pursue, and therefore required to pursue, her administrative remedies as provided by the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 151, et seq.
On the basis of Andrews v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co., 406 U.S. 320, 92 S.Ct. 1562, 32 L.Ed.2d 95 (1972); Rader v. United Transportation Union, 718 F.2d 1012 (11th Cir.1983), and Thomas v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis R. Co., 185 F.2d 614 (6th Cir.1950), the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.