Case Name: Walter A. INGRAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-12-09
Citations: 609 So. 2d 166
Docket Number: No. 92-03249
Parties: Walter A. INGRAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and HALL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 609
Pages: 166–166

Head Matter:
Walter A. INGRAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 92-03249.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Dec. 9, 1992.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Ingram appeals the dismissal of his post-conviction relief motion. We affirm. The trial court properly dismissed Ingram's motion because it did not comply with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.987. We also find that the claims Ingram raises to support his motion are without merit.
Affirmed.
SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and HALL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.