Case Name: Terry A. GANDY, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of David Charles Gandy, deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Neal Patrick ROBEY, c/o Stafford County Sheriffs Office, Defendant-Appellant, and Commonwealth of Virginia; Charles E. Jett, c/o Stafford County Sheriffs Office; John Does 1-25; Jane Does 1-25; Joseph D. Pittman; David M. Rohrer, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-03-21
Citations: 418 F. App'x 247
Docket Number: No. 10-1903
Parties: Terry A. GANDY, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of David Charles Gandy, deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Neal Patrick ROBEY, c/o Stafford County Sheriffs Office, Defendant-Appellant, and Commonwealth of Virginia; Charles E. Jett, c/o Stafford County Sheriffs Office; John Does 1-25; Jane Does 1-25; Joseph D. Pittman; David M. Rohrer, Defendants.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 418
Pages: 247–248

Head Matter:
Terry A. GANDY, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of David Charles Gandy, deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Neal Patrick ROBEY, c/o Stafford County Sheriffs Office, Defendant-Appellant, and Commonwealth of Virginia; Charles E. Jett, c/o Stafford County Sheriffs Office; John Does 1-25; Jane Does 1-25; Joseph D. Pittman; David M. Rohrer, Defendants.
No. 10-1903.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 24, 2011.
Decided: March 21, 2011.
Jeff W. Rosen, Lisa Ehrich, Pender & Coward, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellant. Peter C. Grenier, Andre M. Gregorian, Bode & Grenier, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Neal Patrick Robey appeals a district court order denying his motion for summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity, arguing that even under the version of the facts assumed by the district court, the law was not clearly established at the time of the acts underlying this suit that Robey's use of lethal force was unconstitutional. Because the district court considered only whether a factual dispute made summary judgment inappropriate, there is no legal issue that would support appellate jurisdiction. See Iko v. Shreve, 585 F.3d 225, 237 (4th Cir.2008). We therefore dismiss Robey's appeal.
DISMISSED.