Case Name: Jim HARVEY, R. Rochelle Burns, Petitioners, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF ELECTIONS AND ETHICS, Respondent, Janice Jackson, Intervenor
Court: District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Decision Date: 1991-01-15
Citations: 584 A.2d 55
Docket Number: Nos. 90-1197, 90-1203
Parties: Jim HARVEY, R. Rochelle Burns, Petitioners, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF ELECTIONS AND ETHICS, Respondent, Janice Jackson, Intervenor.
Judges: Before ROGERS, Chief Judge, and NEWMAN, FERREN, BELSON, TERRY, STEADMAN, SCHWELB, FARRELL and WAGNER, Associate Judges.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 584
Pages: 55–56

Head Matter:
Jim HARVEY, R. Rochelle Burns, Petitioners, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF ELECTIONS AND ETHICS, Respondent, Janice Jackson, Intervenor.
Nos. 90-1197, 90-1203.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Jan. 15, 1991.
Richard E. Messick and Roger S. Ballen-tine, Washington, D.C., for petitioner Harvey.
R. Rochelle Burns, pro se.
William H. Lewis, Washington, D.C., with whom Alice P. McCrory was on the brief, for respondent.
Maurice Joseph, Washington, D.C., for intervenor.
Before ROGERS, Chief Judge, and NEWMAN, FERREN, BELSON, TERRY, STEADMAN, SCHWELB, FARRELL and WAGNER, Associate Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
On consideration of respondent's petition for rehearing en banc; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, it is
ORDERED that the petition for rehearing en banc is denied.