Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Benny NELSON, Appellant; Benny NELSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1993-01-19
Citations: 844 S.W.2d 595
Docket Number: Nos. 60040, 61525
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Benny NELSON, Appellant. Benny NELSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 844
Pages: 595–595

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Benny NELSON, Appellant. Benny NELSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 60040, 61525.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Jan. 19, 1993.
Elizabeth Haines, David C. Hemingway, St. Louis, for appellant.
William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Robert Alan Kelly, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondént.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant Benny Nelson (Defendant) appeals from his conviction and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentia-ry hearing. We affirm per Rule 84.16(b) and Rule 30.25(b). No error of law appears and Defendant's post-conviction claim is refuted by the record. An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.