Case Name: Leviton et al. v. United States
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1952-05-12
Citations: 343 U.S. 946
Docket Number: No. 326
Parties: Leviton et al. v. United States.
Judges: Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion certiorari should be granted.
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 343
Pages: 946–949

Head Matter:
No. 326,
Misc.
Leviton et al. v. United States.
Sidney Feldshuh for Levitón; John Logan O’Donnell for Markowitz; and David E. Scoll for Blumenfeld, petitioners. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Mclnerney, Beatrice Rosenberg and Murry Lee Randall for the United States.
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion certiorari should be granted.

Opinion:
Memorandum filed by Mr. Justice Frankfurter.
Memorandum of
Mr. Justice Frankfurter.
This seems to me to be another instance where it becomes helpful to an understanding of the exercise of the Court's discretionary jurisdiction in granting or denying certiorari, to indicate the kind of question that did not commend itself to at least four Justices as appropriate for review by this Court. Several questions were raised by the petition for certiorari. It suffices to indicate the nature of only one, which can be most helpfully conveyed by giving the views of the Court of Appeals and of the dissenting opinion. 193 F. 2d 848.