Case Name: Jerry HARRY, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Leonard SCHWALBERT, Deceased, Defendant, Samuel Rauls, Personal Representative of the Estate of Leonard Schwalbert, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1992-05-19
Citations: 829 S.W.2d 129
Docket Number: No. 59593
Parties: Jerry HARRY, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Leonard SCHWALBERT, Deceased, Defendant, Samuel Rauls, Personal Representative of the Estate of Leonard Schwalbert, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 829
Pages: 129–129

Head Matter:
Jerry HARRY, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Leonard SCHWALBERT, Deceased, Defendant, Samuel Rauls, Personal Representative of the Estate of Leonard Schwalbert, Respondent.
No. 59593.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
May 19, 1992.
David P. Spitznagel, Kirkwood, for plaintiff, appellant.
John W. Hammon, Hillsboro, for respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendant. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).