Case Name: IN RE: Michael NORWOOD, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-01-11
Citations: 672 F. App'x 212
Docket Number: No. 16-3865
Parties: IN RE: Michael NORWOOD, Petitioner
Judges: Before: MCKEE, JORDAN and RESTREPO, Circuit Judges
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 672
Pages: 212–212

Head Matter:
IN RE: Michael NORWOOD, Petitioner
No. 16-3865
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P. December 1, 2016
(Opinion filed: January 11, 2017)
Michael Norwood, Pro Se
Mark E. Coyne, Esq., Office of United States Attorney, Newark, NJ, Norman Gross, Esq., Office of United States Attorney, Camden, NJ, for Respondent
Before: MCKEE, JORDAN and RESTREPO, Circuit Judges

Opinion:
OPINION
PER CURIAM
Michael Norwood filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the District Court to rule on his amended motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The District Court denied that motion on November 28, 2016. Thus, because Nor-wood has received all of the relief he requested, his petition is now moot. We will therefore dismiss it. See Blanciak v. Allegheny Ludlum Corp., 77 F.3d 690, 698-99 (3d Cir. 1996).
This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent.