Case Name: Sammie WHITE, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-09-01
Citations: 978 S.W.2d 23
Docket Number: No. 73029
Parties: Sammie WHITE, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before SIMON, P.J., and CRANE and MOONEY, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 978
Pages: 23–24

Head Matter:
Sammie WHITE, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 73029.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Sept. 1, 1998.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 26, 1998.
Dave Hemingway, Asst. Sp. Public Defender, St. Louis, for movant-appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jill C. LaHue, Asst Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before SIMON, P.J., and CRANE and MOONEY, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Sammie White (Movant) appeals from the judgment dismissing his Rule 24.085 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant pleaded guilty to unlawful use of a weapon and received a suspended imposition of sentence with two years of probation. He concedes that he was released from his probation and was neither convicted of a felony nor delivered to the Missouri Department of Corrections. Rule 24.035 provides a remedy only for persons "convicted of a felony on a plea of guilty and delivered to the custody of the department of corrections.... " Unless these conditions are met, the motion court is without jurisdiction to entertain the motion. Barna v. State, 918 S.W.2d 417, 418 (Mo.App. E.D.1996); Hopkins v. State, 802 S.W.2d 956, 958 (Mo.App. W.D.1991). Therefore, we conclude the motion court's dismissal is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value and we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).