Case Name: Mark A. WARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WAVY BROADCASTING, INCORPORATED; Lin Television Corporation, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-02-10
Citations: 86 F. App'x 662
Docket Number: No. 03-1772
Parties: Mark A. WARD, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. WAVY BROADCASTING, INCORPORATED; Lin Television Corporation, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 86
Pages: 662–662

Head Matter:
Mark A. WARD, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. WAVY BROADCASTING, INCORPORATED; Lin Television Corporation, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 03-1772.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 26, 2003.
Decided Feb. 10, 2004.
Mark A. Ward, Appellant pro se. William McCardell Furr, Willcox & Savage, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before LUTTIG, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Mark A. Ward appeals the district court's order holding him in civil contempt of its September 30, 2002 pre-filing injunction order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ward v. WAVY Broad., Inc., No. CA-99-461-2 (E.D. Va. filed June 17, 2003 & entered June 18, 2003). We deny Ward's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED