Case Name: Sanford Weisburst, Respondent, v. Joanna Dreifus, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2011-11-15
Citations: 89 A.D.3d 536
Docket Number: 
Parties: Sanford Weisburst, Respondent, v Joanna Dreifus, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 89
Pages: 536–536

Head Matter:
Sanford Weisburst, Respondent, v Joanna Dreifus, Appellant.
[932 NYS2d 689]

Opinion:
The court did not abuse its discretion in finding that defendant's underlying motion for an emergency stay contained "false charges [against plaintiff] that were expressed by means of a tortured and very partial rendering of the facts that can only have been deliberately crafted to mislead" and was therefore frivolous within the meaning of 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 (see e.g. Rogovin v Rogovin, 27 AD3d 233 [2006]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Catterson, Moskowitz, Renwick and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.