Case Name: Christine M. LOCKETTE, Plaintiff-Appellant v. DR. MIRACLE LLC; Solo Laboratories Inc.; King Beauty Distributor Corporation, Defendants-Appellees Sarah Cho, Movant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-10-11
Citations: 491 F. App'x 771
Docket Number: No. 12-2123
Parties: Christine M. LOCKETTE, Plaintiff-Appellant v. DR. MIRACLE LLC; Solo Laboratories Inc.; King Beauty Distributor Corporation, Defendants-Appellees Sarah Cho, Movant-Appellee.
Judges: Before MURPHY, ARNOLD, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 491
Pages: 771–771

Head Matter:
Christine M. LOCKETTE, Plaintiff-Appellant v. DR. MIRACLE LLC; Solo Laboratories Inc.; King Beauty Distributor Corporation, Defendants-Appellees Sarah Cho, Movant-Appellee.
No. 12-2123.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 5, 2012.
Filed: Oct. 11, 2012.
Christine M. Lockette, St. Louis, MO, pro se.
Jacqueline M. Kinder, Jessica A. Powers, Russell F. Watters Brown & James, Luke Baumstark, Lisa Larkin, Steven Sanders, Williams & Venker, St. Louis, MO, for Defendants-Appellees.
Sarah Cho, St. Louis, MO, pro se.
Before MURPHY, ARNOLD, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Christine Lockette appeals the district court's order dismissing her complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Upon careful de novo review, see Knutson v. City of Fargo, 600 F.3d 992, 995 (8th Cir.2010) (dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction reviewed de novo), we find no basis for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Audrey G. Fleissig, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.