Case Name: ERIC SHELBY, Petitioner, v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1989-05-24
Citations: 96 Or. App. 739
Docket Number: A-2-88-139; CA A48013
Parties: ERIC SHELBY, Petitioner, v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, Respondent.
Judges: Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Newman and Deits, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 96
Pages: 739–740

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted April 10,
fine vacated; otherwise affirmed May 24,
reconsideration denied August 18,
petition for review denied September 19, 1989 (308 Or 382)
ERIC SHELBY, Petitioner, v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, Respondent.
(A-2-88-139; CA A48013)
773 P2d 1364
Steven H. Gorham, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.
Douglas F. Zier, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.
Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Newman and Deits, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Petitioner seeks review of a final order of the Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary that found that he had violated two disciplinary rules and imposed, inter alia, a $100 fine. He first contends that there is not sufficient evidence to support the finding of guilty. There is. However, respondent concedes, and we agree, that the fine is invalid. Watson v. OSP, 90 Or App 85, 750 P2d 1188 (1988). His remaining contentions do not warrant discussion.
Fine vacated; otherwise affirmed.