Case Name: Theodore SWINK, Jr., Employee/Respondent, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Employer/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-06-10
Citations: 108 S.W.3d 127
Docket Number: No. ED 81202
Parties: Theodore SWINK, Jr., Employee/Respondent, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Employer/Appellant.
Judges: Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, C.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., CHARLES B. BLACKMAR, SR. J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 108
Pages: 127–127

Head Matter:
Theodore SWINK, Jr., Employee/Respondent, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Employer/Appellant.
No. ED 81202.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
June 10, 2003.
Patricia A. Hageman, Mark J. O’Toole, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Martin, Malee and Leopold, James M. Martin, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, C.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., CHARLES B. BLACKMAR, SR. J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The City of St. Louis appeals the award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission ("Commission") granting Theodore Swink, Jr. workers' compensation benefits. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the Commission's award is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. A detailed opinion would be of no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a brief memorandum opinion, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision. The award is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).