Case Name: Jones et al. v. Bradford, Sheriff, et al.
Court: Appellate Court of Indiana
Jurisdiction: Indiana
Decision Date: 1901-05-28
Citations: 27 Ind. App. 698
Docket Number: No. 3,768
Parties: Jones et al. v. Bradford, Sheriff, et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Indiana Court of Appeals Reports
Volume: 27
Pages: 698–698

Head Matter:
Jones et al. v. Bradford, Sheriff, et al.
[No. 3,768.
Filed May 28, 1901.]
From Grant Circuit Court; H. J. Paulus, Judge.
Action by Lydia A. Jones and others against Cassius C. Bradford and others to enjoin the sale of real estate. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiffs appeal.
Affirmed.
W. H. Carroll and G. D. Dean, for appellants.
R. T. St. John and W. H. Charles, for appellees.

Opinion:
Black, C. J.
— Under an assignment that the court erred in overruling their motion for a new trial, appellants have discussed the evidence; but there can be no decision upon the merits, for the reason that the evidence is not presented by a bill of exceptions, an ineffectual attempt being made to bring it into the record by the method provided in the sixth section of the act of 1899. Acts 1899, p. 384. See Adams v. State, 156 Ind. 596; Anderson v. Lake Shore, etc., R. Co., 26 Ind. App. 196; Shirk v. Lingeman, 26 Ind. App. 630; Horner v. Clark, ante, 6.
Judgment affirmed.