Case Name: SULLIVAN, LONG AND HAGERTY et al., Petitioners, v. Charles B. ROBERTSON et al., Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1965-07-21
Citations: 177 So. 2d 471
Docket Number: No. 34284
Parties: SULLIVAN, LONG AND HAGERTY et al., Petitioners, v. Charles B. ROBERTSON et al., Respondents.
Judges: THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 177
Pages: 471–471

Head Matter:
SULLIVAN, LONG AND HAGERTY et al., Petitioners, v. Charles B. ROBERTSON et al., Respondents.
No. 34284.
Supreme Court of Florida.
July 21, 1965.
Rodney Durrance and John McQuigg, ■of Shackleford, Farrior, Stallings, Glos & Evans, Tampa, for petitioners.
Calvin J. Faucett, Tampa, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date March' 1, 1965.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.
THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, O'CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.