Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Manuel ROJAS-LUVIANO, also known as Manuel Luviano Rojas, also known as Manuel Rojas Luviano, also known as Manuel Luviano-Rojas, also known as Manuel Rojas, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-10-25
Citations: 543 F. App'x 392
Docket Number: No. 12-20462
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Manuel ROJAS-LUVIANO, also known as Manuel Luviano Rojas, also known as Manuel Rojas Luviano, also known as Manuel Luviano-Rojas, also known as Manuel Rojas, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before JOLLY, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 543
Pages: 392–393

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Manuel ROJAS-LUVIANO, also known as Manuel Luviano Rojas, also known as Manuel Rojas Luviano, also known as Manuel Luviano-Rojas, also known as Manuel Rojas, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-20462
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Oct. 25, 2013.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Clinard J. Hanby, Esq., The Woodlands, Manuel Rojas-Luviano, FCI Beaumont Medium, Beaumont, TX, pro se, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before JOLLY, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Manuel Rojas-Luviano has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Rojas-Luviano has not filed a response and has been removed from the United States. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as frivolous, see 5th Cir. R. 42.2, and in part as moot. See United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis, 483 F.3d 381, 382-83 (5th Cir. 2007).
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.