Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Dominic Pullano, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1992-07-14
Citations: 185 A.D.2d 628
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dominic Pullano, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 185
Pages: 628–629

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dominic Pullano, Appellant.

Opinion:
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: By pleading guilty, defendant forfeited his claim that the Grand Jury proceedings were defective because evidence obtained pursuant to an unlawful wiretap (see, People v Chiarenza, 185 AD2d 679 [decided herewith]; Peo ple v Candella, 171 AD2d 329) was presented to the Grand Jury (see, People v Kazmarick, 52 NY2d 322, 326).
We decline defendant's request that we modify, in the interest of justice, the one-year imprisonment term imposed by the sentencing court. (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J.—Conspiracy, 3rd Degree.) Present —Denman, P. J., Pine, Balio, Fallon and Doerr, JJ.