Case Name: Lovisa Construction Co., Inc., Respondent, v. City of New York, Appellant, and Morse Diesel, Inc., et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1987-02-12
Citations: 69 N.Y.2d 801
Docket Number: 
Parties: Lovisa Construction Co., Inc., Respondent, v City of New York, Appellant, and Morse Diesel, Inc., et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 69
Pages: 801–802

Head Matter:
Lovisa Construction Co., Inc., Respondent, v City of New York, Appellant, and Morse Diesel, Inc., et al., Respondents.
Argued January 14, 1987;
decided February 12, 1987
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Frederick A. O. Schwarz, Jr., Corporation Counsel (Barry P. Schwartz and Fay Leoussis of counsel), for appellant.
Michael P. Goldsmith, Gary M. Axenfeld and Stephen M. Harnik for Lovisa Construction Co., Inc., respondent.
Tony Berman for Sarcon Construction Corp., respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division in Naclerio Contr. Co. v City of New York (116 AD2d 463, affd 69 NY2d 794 [decided herewith]) and the question certified answered in the affirmative.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.