Case Name: Samuel WILCHER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1973-05-23
Citations: 277 So. 2d 562
Docket Number: No. 72-220
Parties: Samuel WILCHER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: HOBSON, A. C. J., McNULTY, J., and PIERCE, J. (Ret.), concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 277
Pages: 562–563

Head Matter:
Samuel WILCHER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 72-220.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
May 23, 1973.
Walter R. Talley, Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and David Luther Woodward, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
While this appeal was pending in this court, the Supreme Court of Florida rendered its opinion in Mancini v. State, Fla. 1973, 273 So.2d 371, receding from the limitation in State v. Wright, Fla. 1969, 224 So.2d 300, and State v. Owens, Fla.1970, 233 So.2d 389.
In light of Mancini, supra, we have thereupon carefully examined the entire record on file here on behalf of appellant Wilcher, considered the sufficiency of the evidence, and find nothing to justify a reversal of the judgment appealed. Accordingly, the judgment is thereupon
Affirmed.
HOBSON, A. C. J., McNULTY, J., and PIERCE, J. (Ret.), concur.