Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Dominique WHITFIELD, Defendant-Appellant.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FIVE
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2018-04-03
Citations: 544 S.W.3d 305
Docket Number: No. ED 105178
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent,
v.
Dominique WHITFIELD, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 544
Pages: 305–306

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent,
v.
Dominique WHITFIELD, Defendant-Appellant.
No. ED 105178
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FIVE.
Filed: April 3, 2018
Kevin L. Schriener, 141 N. Meramec Avenue, Suite 314, Clayton, MO 63105, for appellant.
Joshua D. Hawley, Atty. Gen., Evan J. Buchheim, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.
Before James M. Dowd, C.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and Anthony Rex Gabbert, Sp.J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
The defendant, Dominique Whitfield, appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis following his conviction by a jury of voluntary manslaughter, in violation of section 565.023 RSMo. (2000 & Supp. 2014), and armed criminal action, in violation of section 571.015 RSMo. (2016). The trial court imposed the jury's recommended sentences of fifteen years of imprisonment for voluntary manslaughter and four years for armed criminal action, and ordered the sentences served concurrently. Finding no error, we affirm.
An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.
We affirm the trial court's judgment. Rule 30.25(b).