Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Lee NOBLES, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1975-09-24
Citations: 522 F.2d 1274
Docket Number: No. 73-2280
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Lee NOBLES, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before ELY and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges, and ENRIGHT, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 522
Pages: 1274–1275

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Lee NOBLES, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 73-2280.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Sept. 24, 1975.
Nicholas R. Allis, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Los Angeles, Cal. (argued), for defendant-appellant.
Darrell McIntyre, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffappellee.
The Honorable William B. Enright, United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
OPINION
Before ELY and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges, and ENRIGHT, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Pursuant to the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, dated June 23, 1975, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed. United States v. Nobles, 422 U.S. 225, 95 S.Ct. 2160, 45 L.Ed.2d 141 (1975), rev'g United States v. Brown, 501 F.2d 146, 150-157 (9th Cir. 1974). The panel has reconsidered all issues raised by the appellant, and finds no grounds for reversal.