Case Name: CAMPION v. CARL
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1958-04-16
Citations: 213 Or. 262
Docket Number: 
Parties: CAMPION v. CARL
Judges: Before Perry, Chief Justice, and Lusk, Warner and Sloan, Justices.
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 213
Pages: 262–263

Head Matter:
Argued April 10,
affirmed April 16, 1958
CAMPION v. CARL
324 P. 2d 474
Otto B. STcopil, Jr., Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was C. William Dobson, Salem.
Bruce Spaulding, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Mautz, Souther, Spaulding, Denecke & Kinsey and Gordon Moore, Portland.
Before Perry, Chief Justice, and Lusk, Warner and Sloan, Justices.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The plaintiff and appellant brought action against defendant for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained in an automobile accident. The defendant by his answer, among other things, pleaded that plaintiff for a valuable consideration had, sub sequent to the accident, settled with the defendant and had thereby released and discharged him from any and all claims arising therefrom, praying for an order enjoining the plaintiff from proceeding further in the prosecution of her action for damages. Plaintiff filed a reply seeking a decree cancelling the release because of alleged fraud. By stipulation the issues raised by the answer and reply were heard by the court sitting in equity. Prom a decree favorable to the defendant and enjoining plaintiff in her law action, the plaintiff appeals.
Our examination of the record indicates no reversible error and we, therefore, affirm the decree.
Costs to neither party.