Case Name: Kathleen C. BENISON and Christopher Benison, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. George ROSS, President of Central Michigan University in His individual and Official Capacity, et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-11-13
Citations: 771 F.3d 331
Docket Number: No. 13-2554
Parties: Kathleen C. BENISON and Christopher Benison, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. George ROSS, President of Central Michigan University in His individual and Official Capacity, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: BEFORE: MOORE, SUTTON, and ALARCÓN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 771
Pages: 331–332

Head Matter:
Kathleen C. BENISON and Christopher Benison, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. George ROSS, President of Central Michigan University in His individual and Official Capacity, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 13-2554.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Nov. 13, 2014.
BEFORE: MOORE, SUTTON, and ALARCÓN, Circuit Judges.
The Honorable Arthur L. Alarcon, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
ORDER
The court received a petition for rehearing en banc. The original panel has reviewed the petition for rehearing and concludes that the issues raised in the petition were fully considered upon the original submission and decision of the ease. The petition then was circulated to the full court. No judge has requested a vote on the suggestion for rehearing en banc.
Therefore, the petition is denied. Judge Alarcon would grant rehearing for the reasons stated in his dissent.