Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Ernesto CASTILLO, aka, et al., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-03-19
Citations: 31 F. App'x 548
Docket Number: No. 01-10548; D.C. No. CR-00-00440-SOM
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. David Ernesto CASTILLO, aka, et al., Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 31
Pages: 548–549

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. David Ernesto CASTILLO, aka, et al., Defendant—Appellant.
No. 01-10548. D.C. No. CR-00-00440-SOM.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 11, 2002 .
Decided March 19, 2002.
Before FARRIS, W. FLETCHER and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
David Ernesto Castillo appeals from the 84-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for unlawful re-entry of a convicted felon into the United States without consent, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.
Castillo contends that, in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), his sentence was improperly enhanced on the basis of prior aggravated felony convictions which were not charged in the indictment, submitted to the jury nor proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Castillo acknowledges that this argument is foreclosed by United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 966, 121 S.Ct. 1503, 149 L.Ed.2d 388 (2001) and that he raises the contention to preserve it for further appeal. Thus, we do not consider it further.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.