Case Name: DiJoseph Petition
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1958-10-16
Citations: 394 Pa. 19
Docket Number: No. 194 Miscellaneous Docket No. 11
Parties: DiJoseph Petition.
Judges: Before Jones, C. J., Bell, Musmanno, Jones and.Cohen, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 394
Pages: 19–31

Head Matter:
DiJoseph Petition.
Argued October 3, 1958.
Before Jones, C. J., Bell, Musmanno, Jones and.Cohen, JJ.
October 16, 1958:
J. William Bitter, Jr., First Assistant District Attorney, with him Bernard E. BiJoseph, District Attorney, for petitioner.
Samuel Strauss, with him P. Richard Thomas, for Pennsylvania District Attorneys’ Association, amicus curiae.
William L. O’Hey, Jr., with him Henderson, Wetherhill & O’Hey, for Ethel Kravitz, intervenor.
Thomas B. McBride, Attorney General, as amicus curiae.

Opinion:
Opinion
Per Curiam,
' A majority of the court is of the opinion that the District Attorney should not be required to make available before tidal for examination and inspection by Ethel Kravitz and her counsel photographs of fingerprints, if any, in the possession of the District Attorney. The order of the court below is amended accordingly.
Order amended; rule discharged and writ of prohibition refused.