Case Name: Richard Wayne SEARS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jeffrey DILLMAN, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-10-09
Citations: 541 F. App'x 329
Docket Number: No. 13-6835
Parties: Richard Wayne SEARS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jeffrey DILLMAN, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 541
Pages: 329–329

Head Matter:
Richard Wayne SEARS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jeffrey DILLMAN, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 13-6835.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 16, 2013.
Decided: Oct. 9, 2013.
Richard Wayne Sears, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Paul Murphy, Office Of The Attorney General Of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Richard Wayne Sears seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000).
We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Sears has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.