Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. William Paul Miele, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1968-05-06
Citations: 30 A.D.2d 539
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. William Paul Miele, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 30
Pages: 539–539

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. William Paul Miele, Appellant.

Opinion:
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 18, 1967, dismissed. An order denying a motion for resentence is not appealable (People v. Holmes, 27 A D 2d 843). Further, coram nobis is not a proper remedy to raise the question of an improperly accepted guilty plea where the facts giving rise to such claim appear on the face of the record (see People v. Sadness, 300 N. Y. 69). In any event, if the merits of defendant's claim were properly before us,, we would hold that his version of the circumstances surrounding the commission of attempted grand larceny in the second degree, to which he offered to plead guilty, did establish his guilt thereof (cf. People v. Serrano, 15 N Y 2d 304). Beldock, P. J., Christ, Rabin, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.