Case Name: LENTON CONSTRUCTION CO., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM HILL AND AINA HILL, HIS WIFE, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS CO-PARTNERS TRADING AS W. HILL CO., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1949-10-17
Citations: 3 N.J. 40
Docket Number: 
Parties: LENTON CONSTRUCTION CO., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM HILL AND AINA HILL, HIS WIFE, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS CO-PARTNERS TRADING AS W. HILL CO., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 3
Pages: 40–41

Head Matter:
LENTON CONSTRUCTION CO., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM HILL AND AINA HILL, HIS WIFE, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS CO-PARTNERS TRADING AS W. HILL CO., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Argued October 10, 1949
Decided October 17, 1949.
Mr. Theodore Rabinowitz argued the cause for the appellant (Mr. Charles Rubenstein, attorney. Mr. Bernard S. Glide, on the brief).
Mr. L. Stanley Ford argued the cause for the respondents (Messrs. Ford & Taylor, attorneys).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Judgment in this case was entered in the Superior Court, Law Division, on December 13, 1948. Upon appeal to the Appellate Division a unanimous judgment of affirmance was entered May 23, 1949. 4 N. J. Super. 66. Thereafter notice of appeal to this court was filed. The case is not one in which an appeal to this court as of right exists under article YI, section Y, paragraph 1 of the Constitution of 1947 or under Bule 1:2-l, and the appeal is accordingly dismissed.
For dismissal—Chief Justice Yandeebilt, and Justices Case, Hei-iee, OliphajStt, Wacíieneeld, Büelistg and Ackeesoet—7.
Opposed—None.