Case Name: EXCISE BOARD OF KAY COUNTY v. CHICAGO, R. I. & P. RY. CO.
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1932-02-02
Citations: 155 Okla. 34
Docket Number: No. 22245
Parties: EXCISE BOARD OF KAY COUNTY v. CHICAGO, R. I. & P. RY. CO.
Judges: LESTER, C. J., CLARK, Y. C. .7., and RILEY, HBENER, OüLLISON, SWIN-DALL, McNEILL, and KORNEGAY, JL, concur.
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 155
Pages: 34–35

Head Matter:
EXCISE BOARD OF KAY COUNTY v. CHICAGO, R. I. & P. RY. CO.
No. 22245.
Opinion Filed Feb. 2, 1932.
Bruce Potter, Co. Atty., for plaintiff in error.
AA. R Bleakmore, W. L. Farmer, John Barry, and Robert E. Lee, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
ANDREWS, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the Court of Tax Review in favor of the protestant, Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company, and against the excise board of Kay county, Okla., involving appropriations and levies made by the excise board of Kay county for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1931.
The parties hereto have stipulated and agreed that the decision of this court in cause No. 22128, Caddo County, Oklahoma, Company (this day rendered)' T55 Okla. 82, 7 P. (2d) 800, shall be controlling herein. Pursuant to that stipulation, the law as announced in that case is applied and, pursuant thereto, the judgment of the Court of Tax Review is affirmed.
LESTER, C. J., CLARK, Y. C. .7., and RILEY, HBENER, OüLLISON, SWIN-DALL, McNEILL, and KORNEGAY, JL, concur.