Case Name: Ruth A. Conklin v. M. A. Burdick
Court: Illinois Appellate Court
Jurisdiction: Illinois
Decision Date: 1880-04-02
Citations: 6 Ill. App. 153
Docket Number: 
Parties: Ruth A. Conklin v. M. A. Burdick.
Judges: 
Reporter: Illinois Appellate Court Reports
Volume: 6
Pages: 153–154

Head Matter:
Ruth A. Conklin v. M. A. Burdick.
Error will rot always reverse. — Although several erroneous instructions were given, yet this court is of opinion that substantial justice has been done, and affirms the judgment.'
Error to the City Court of Alton; the Hon. H. S. Baber, Judge, presiding.
Opinion filed April 2, 1880.
Mr. J. H. Yager, for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Alexander W. Hope, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
There can be no question that several erroneous instructions were given to the jury on the the trial of this cause. We think, however, upon a careful examination of all the evidence in the record, substantial justice was done by the verdict of the jury, and that a different verdict could not, under the evidence, have been permitted to stand.
The judgment is therefore affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.