Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Clement Burford, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1984-11-13
Citations: 105 A.D.2d 752
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Clement Burford, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 105
Pages: 752–752

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Clement Burford, Appellant.

Opinion:
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (McMahon, J.), rendered December 28,1982, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and unlawful imprisonment in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Judgment affirmed.
The jury's verdict, which found defendant guilty of unlawful imprisonment in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree but acquitted him of kidnapping in the first degree, was not repugnant in view of the elements of the crimes as charged (People v Tucker, 55 NY2d 1). In any event, the defendant's claim of a repugnant verdict was not preserved for appellate review as his counsel failed to raise an objection thereto at trial (CPL 470.05; People v Satloff, 56 NY2d 745; People v Figueroa, 96 AD2d 515).
We do not find error in the admission of expert testimony regarding the existence of gunpowder stains on the towel which the defendant used to cover the gun. Although the complainant was unable to state whether the towel was wrapped around the gun at the time it was fired by the defendant, there was evidence in the record upon which one could conclude that the towel was in close proximity to the gun at that time. Weinstein, J. P., Brown, Boyers and Eiber, JJ., concur.