Case Name: RIDLEY'S-THE OLD CHAMBERS STREET CANDY MANUFACTORY, RESPONDENT, v. JAMES B. BROCKHURST, APPELLANT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1914-10-16
Citations: 86 N.J.L. 697
Docket Number: 
Parties: RIDLEY’S—THE OLD CHAMBERS STREET CANDY MANUFACTORY, RESPONDENT, v. JAMES B. BROCKHURST, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 86
Pages: 697–698

Head Matter:
RIDLEY’S—THE OLD CHAMBERS STREET CANDY MANUFACTORY, RESPONDENT, v. JAMES B. BROCKHURST, APPELLANT.
Submitted July 6, 1914
Decided October 16, 1914.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, in which the following per curiam was filed :
“We think the court properly declined to nonsuit the plaintiff. The plaintiff submitted proof, without objection, that it was a corporation.
“There was no finding of fact as to where the contract in suit was made. The presumption in such case is that the necessary fact was found, i. e.. that it was not a New Jersey contract.
• “There is no merit in the objection that the judgment should have been only for the excess of the payment into court. The statute relied upon (Farnph. L. 1904. p. 241) contemplates a judgment for the amount found due.
“The judgment will he affirmed, with costs.”
For the appellant, Adolf L. Engeilce.
For the respondent, I-Iartshornc, Jnsley & Lealce.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review will ho affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Kaliscu, Black, Bogert, Yre-DENBURGH, TERHUNE, HEPPENHEIMER. WILLIAMS, JJ. 12.
For reversed — None.