Case Name: Ellis v. Hatchew
Court: Michigan Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Michigan
Decision Date: 2009-07-10
Citations: 483 Mich. 1132
Docket Number: No. 138083
Parties: Ellis v Hatchew,
Judges: Kelly, C.J., and Cavanagh and Hathaway, JJ. We would reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals because we are not persuaded that the trial court erred when it denied defendant’s motion for summary disposition. When the facts are viewed in a light most favorable to plaintiff, there were disputed issues of material fact relating to the applicability of the open and obvious danger doctrine.
Reporter: Michigan Reports
Volume: 483
Pages: 1132–1132

Head Matter:
Ellis v Hatchew,
No. 138083;

Opinion:
Leave to Appeal Denied July 10, 2009:
Court of Appeals No. 279930.
Kelly, C.J., and Cavanagh and Hathaway, JJ. We would reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals because we are not persuaded that the trial court erred when it denied defendant's motion for summary disposition. When the facts are viewed in a light most favorable to plaintiff, there were disputed issues of material fact relating to the applicability of the open and obvious danger doctrine.