Case Name: In the Matter of the Compensation of Alfonso Carranza-Romero, Claimant. SAIF CORPORATION and Hazel Dell Orchards, Petitioners, v. Alfonso CARRANZA-ROMERO, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1999-07-07
Citations: 161 Or. App. 658
Docket Number: WCB 97-05388; CA A101469
Parties: In the Matter of the Compensation of Alfonso Carranza-Romero, Claimant. SAIF CORPORATION and Hazel Dell Orchards, Petitioners, v. Alfonso CARRANZA-ROMERO, Respondent.
Judges: Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Deits, Chief Judge, and Armstrong, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 161
Pages: 658–659

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted February 11,
remanded for reconsideration July 7,1999
In the Matter of the Compensation of Alfonso Carranza-Romero, Claimant. SAIF CORPORATION and Hazel Dell Orchards, Petitioners, v. Alfonso CARRANZA-ROMERO, Respondent.
(WCB 97-05388; CA A101469)
987 P2d 529
David L. Runner argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioners.
Bruce D. Smith argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.
Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Deits, Chief Judge, and Armstrong, Judge.
PER CURIAM
Deits, C. J., vice Warren, P. J., retired.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Employer seeks review of a Workers' Compensation Board order that affirmed an award of temporary disability compensation. The Board relied on its decision in Kenneth P. Bundy, 48 Van Natta 2501 (1996), which we subsequently reversed. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Bundy, 159 Or App 44, 978 P2d 385 (1999). Whether our decision in Bundy will affect the determination of claimant's entitlement to temporary disability compensation is not apparent from the record before us. Consequently, we remand to the Board for reconsideration in light of our decision in Bundy.
Remanded for reconsideration.