Case Name: Davada C. LOUGHLIN; D.C.L., Davada C. Loughlin for D.C.L., a minor; Britt S. Moore, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. VANCE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES; Linda Fry, Director at Vance County Department of Social Services; Rene Betancourt, Social Work Supervisor at Vance County Department of Social Services; Latoya M. Harris, Case worker, Child Services at Vance County Department of Social Services; Vance County, Defendants-Appellees, and North Carolina Department of Health and Human Resources, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-09-11
Citations: 615 F. App'x 809
Docket Number: No. 15-1435
Parties: Davada C. LOUGHLIN; D.C.L., Davada C. Loughlin for D.C.L., a minor; Britt S. Moore, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. VANCE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES; Linda Fry, Director at Vance County Department of Social Services; Rene Betancourt, Social Work Supervisor at Vance County Department of Social Services; Latoya M. Harris, Case worker, Child Services at Vance County Department of Social Services; Vance County, Defendants-Appellees, and North Carolina Department of Health and Human Resources, Defendant.
Judges: Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 615
Pages: 809–809

Head Matter:
Davada C. LOUGHLIN; D.C.L., Davada C. Loughlin for D.C.L., a minor; Britt S. Moore, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. VANCE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES; Linda Fry, Director at Vance County Department of Social Services; Rene Betancourt, Social Work Supervisor at Vance County Department of Social Services; Latoya M. Harris, Case worker, Child Services at Vance County Department of Social Services; Vance County, Defendants-Appellees, and North Carolina Department of Health and Human Resources, Defendant.
No. 15-1435.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 9, 2015.
Decided: Sept. 11, 2015.
Davada C. Loughlin, D.C.L., Britt S. Moore, Appellants Pro Se. Sonny Sade Haynes, Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, PLLC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Appellants seek to appeal the district court's order accepting in part the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Loughlin v. Vance Cty. Dep't of Soc. Servs., No. 5:14-cv-00219-FL (E.D.N.C. April 1" 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.