Case Name: John Carrol REYNOLDS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1957-06-29
Citations: 306 S.W.2d 134
Docket Number: No. 29151
Parties: John Carrol REYNOLDS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 306
Pages: 134–134

Head Matter:
John Carrol REYNOLDS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
No. 29151.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
June 29, 1957.
Rehearing Denied Oct. 16, 1957.
See also, 294 S..W.2d 108.
W. T. Briggs, Port Arthur, for appellant.
Feagin W. Windham, Dist. Atty., Charles L. Ford, Jr., Asst. Dist. Atty., Orange, and Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
DICE, Commissioner.
Appellant was convicted under Art. 802c, Vernon's Ann.P.C., of murder by accident and mistake while driving intoxicated and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for 2 years.
The statement of facts appearing in the record is not shown to have been filed with the clerk of the trial court within 90 days after notice of appeal was given.
Art. 759a, Sec. 4, Vernon's Ann. C.C.P., provides that a statement of facts shall be filed within 90 days after notice of appeal has been given. The statement of facts, not having been filed within the 90-day period provided by statute, cannot be considered. Tarwater v. State, 160 Tex.Cr.R. 59, 265 S.W.2d 83, 267 S.W.2d 410; and Scales v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 272 S.W.2d 118.
In the absence of a statement of facts which can be considered, we are not in position to pass upon the questions presented by appellant pertaining to the admissibility of and sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction. Hankins v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 294 S.W.2d 850.
The indictment, as well as all other matters of procedure, appears regular; therefore, nothing is presented for review.
The judgment is affirmed.
Opinion approved by the Court.