Case Name: RONALD LEROY TEAL, Appellant, v. George H. BALDWIN, Superintendent, Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2001-05-23
Citations: 174 Or. App. 395
Docket Number: CV98-0354; A104201
Parties: RONALD LEROY TEAL, Appellant, v. George H. BALDWIN, Superintendent, Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution, Respondent.
Judges: Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Landau, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 174
Pages: 395–396

Head Matter:
Submitted on remand from the Oregon Supreme Court July 13, 2000,
reversed and remanded May 23, 2001
RONALD LEROY TEAL, Appellant, v. George H. BALDWIN, Superintendent, Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution, Respondent.
CV98-0354; A104201
25 P3d 416
Marc Geller for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General, and Judy C. Lucas, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Landau, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
This case comes before the court on remand from the Oregon Supreme Court in the light of its opinion in Hamel v. Johnson, 330 Or 180, 998 P2d 661 (2000). In this case, the trial court granted the state's motion to dismiss plaintiffs petition for a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that a 1997 Board order extending plaintiffs parole release date rendered moot plaintiffs challenge to a 1995 Board order. We dismissed the appeal on the same mootness grounds. Under Hamel, plaintiffs challenge to the 1995 Board order is not moot. Accordingly, the case must be remanded for consideration of the merits of plaintiffs claim.
Reversed and remanded.