Case Name: Beatrice Schneider, Appellant, v. Harold Schneider, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1933-02
Citations: 238 A.D. 792
Docket Number: 
Parties: Beatrice Schneider, Appellant, v. Harold Schneider, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 238
Pages: 792–793

Head Matter:
Beatrice Schneider, Appellant, v. Harold Schneider, Respondent.

Opinion:
Order and judgment unanimously affirmed. The findings of fact in the decision supporting the judgment of September 23, 1930, were all essential. They were based on issues tendered by the plaintiff's own pleadings and proof. The scope of those findings was not lessened by the affirmance of them by this court in connection with an opinion that indicated in some respects narrower reasons for such affirmance. [See 232 App. Div. 71.] If it were deemed important that these findings should be narrowed, an appropriate request for such relief should have been made, and, if improvidently denied, further relief by appeal was available to the plaintiff. Plaintiff did not pursue that remedy and, therefore, she may not again litigate the same questions through the medium of her first, second and third defenses in her amended reply. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell, Seudder and Davis, JJ.