Case Name: CHRISTMAN v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1922-12-13
Citations: 245 S.W. 916
Docket Number: No. 7367
Parties: CHRISTMAN v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 245
Pages: 916–916

Head Matter:
CHRISTMAN v. STATE.
(No. 7367.)
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Dec. 13, 1922.)
Criminal law <&wkey;1094 — Conviction on a plea of guilty not set aside, where accused was cautioned as to the consequences of plea, and no error appears in record.
Where jjlaintiff, after being warned by the court of the consequences of his act as directed by statute, in pleading guilty to the charge of burglary, and the indictment is regular, and there is no statement of facts or bill of exceptions, his conviction will not be set aside, where no error appears in the record.
<&wkey;>For other oases see same topic and KEY-NUMBEK in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes-
Appeal from District Court, Collin County; F. E. Wilcox, Judge.
Albert Christman, alias J. E. Moore, was convicted of burglary on a plea of guilty, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
R. G. Storey, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Opinion:
LATTIMORE,' J.
Appellant was convicted in the district court of Collin county of the offense- of burglary, and his punishment fixed at three years in the penitentiary.
The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. By it we are informed that, after being duly warned by the court below of the consequences of his act as is directed by statute, appellant entered his plea of guilty before the jury of the offense, and hisi punishment was fixed as aforesaid.
The indictment charged burglary in the usual form, and, no error appearing in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.