Case Name: THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. RUDOLPH F. HARNED, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1905-06-12
Citations: 72 N.J.L. 353
Docket Number: 
Parties: THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. RUDOLPH F. HARNED, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Judges: Before Gummere, Chief Justice, and Justices Fort and Garretson.
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 72
Pages: 353–353

Head Matter:
THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. RUDOLPH F. HARNED, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Argued February 21, 1905
Decided June 12, 1905.
On error to Burlington Quarter Sessions.
Before Gummere, Chief Justice, and Justices Fort and Garretson.
For the plaintiff in error, Sherrerd Depue and Samuel Kalisch, and Samuel Pennington Rotan (of the Pennsylvania bar).
For the defendant in error, Samuel A. Atkinson, Theodore Baches and Robert PL. McCarter, attorney-general.

Opinion:
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Fort, J.
This case is determined by the opinion in the case of State v. Davis, decided at this present term. ,The only difference in the two cases is that the defendant in this case shot at a pigeon as a target and missed it. He intended to hit it. He did not. Such shooting, under the statute, is a misdemeanor.
The judgment is affirmed.