Case Name: Diane WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HUNTINGTON BANCSHARES, INC., an Ohio corporation, d.b.a. Huntington National Bank, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-03-22
Citations: 220 F. App'x 957
Docket Number: No. 06-13489
Parties: Diane WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HUNTINGTON BANCSHARES, INC., an Ohio corporation, d.b.a. Huntington National Bank, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before BLACK, WILSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 220
Pages: 957–957

Head Matter:
Diane WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HUNTINGTON BANCSHARES, INC., an Ohio corporation, d.b.a. Huntington National Bank, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 06-13489
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
March 22, 2007.
Diane Williams, Gulfport, FL, pro se.
Marc L. Fleischauer, Porter Wright Morris & Arthur, LLP, Columbus, OH, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before BLACK, WILSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Diane Williams, a black female proceeding pro se, appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of her employer, Huntington National Bank on her claims of race discrimination brought pursuant to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a), 42 U.S.C. § 1981, and the Florida Civil Rights Act, Fla. Stat. § 760.10. Williams asserts the Bank discriminated against her on the basis of her race because it "demoted" her from a part-time Personal Banker position to a part-time Teller position at the Central Plaza branch. After a de novo review, we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's well-reasoned order of May 22, 2006.
AFFIRMED.
. Williams also makes reference to retaliation, and gender and age discrimination. The complaint alleged only racial discrimination, thus, because Williams' complaint presented one particular claim and was adjudicated on the basis of that claim, consideration of these other issues is inappropriate. See Narey v. Dean, 32 F.3d 1521, 1526 (11th Cir.1994) (stating issues not argued in the district court are generally not considered on appeal).