Case Name: Edward A. Schmidt, Appellant, v. Massapequa Company, Inc., and Others, Defendants, Impleaded with Gould & Newman and Louis Levy, Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1933-12
Citations: 240 A.D. 1011
Docket Number: 
Parties: Edward A. Schmidt, Appellant, v. Massapequa Company, Inc., and Others, Defendants, Impleaded with Gould & Newman and Louis Levy, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 240
Pages: 1011–1011

Head Matter:
Edward A. Schmidt, Appellant, v. Massapequa Company, Inc., and Others, Defendants, Impleaded with Gould & Newman and Louis Levy, Respondents.

Opinion:
Order in so far as an appeal is taken therefrom reversed on the law and the facts and the parts thereof directing a reference and appointing a referee struck out, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant. On the facts disclosed it does not appear that respondent Levy or respondents Gould and Newman had a valid retaining lien as counsel for the attorney of record for plaintiff, who retained control of the action. They have elected to proceed against plaintiff and his attorney by action; and under those circumstances, with the ultimate rights of the parties a matter of doubt, the court will not lend its summary powers to settling a dispute which may be determined by the more orderly method of trial. Young, Kapper, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents as to respondent Levy on the ground that the filing of the undertaking waived the right of appeal.