Case Name: Roberto Funes TERCERO, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-06-02
Citations: 280 F. App'x 552
Docket Number: No. 07-2264
Parties: Roberto Funes TERCERO, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 280
Pages: 552–553

Head Matter:
Roberto Funes TERCERO, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Respondent.
No. 07-2264.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: May 26, 2008.
Filed: June 2, 2008.
Sandrine Lisk, Immigration Law Office, Wichita, KS, for Petitioner.
Kevin J. Conway, Karen Yolanda Drummond, Richard M. Evans, Assistant Director, Thomas W. Hussey, Justin Robert Markel, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Karl V. Kozad, U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service, Kansas City, MO, Lori Scialabba, U.S. Department of Justice, Executive Office for Immigration Review, Office of General Counsel, Falls Church, VA, for Respondent.
Before BYE, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
[UNPUBLISHED]
PER CURIAM.
Roberto Funes Tercero, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), which affirmed an Immigration Judge's (IJ's) denial of withholding of removal based on Tercero's failure to show that he had suffered past persecution or that it was more likely than not he would be persecuted if returned to Guatemala.
Upon careful review, we conclude that the BIA's decision is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. See Ming Ming Wijono v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 868, 872 (8th Cir.2006) (standard of review). The IJ gave specific and eonvinc ing reasons for disbelieving Tereero's testimony regarding past and likely future persecution on account of his Mayan ethnicity. See Mamana v. Gonzales, 436 F.3d 966, 968-69 (8th Cir.2006). Further, the then current Country Report on Human Rights Practices in Guatemala indicated that the Guatemalan government had taken steps to curb discrimination and to protect the rights of the indigenous population. Cf. Pascual v. Mukasey, 514 F.3d 483, 488 (6th Cir.2007) (rejecting asylum claim based on Mayan ethnicity).
Accordingly, we deny the petition.
. Tercero does not challenge the denial of his request for asylum or relief under the Convention Against Torture.