Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Reginald K. CANTLY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-04-19
Citations: 422 F. App'x 369
Docket Number: No. 10-11104
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Reginald K. CANTLY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 422
Pages: 369–370

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Reginald K. CANTLY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-11104
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 19, 2011.
Delonia Anita Watson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Fort Worth, TX for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Kevin Joel Page, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Reginald K. Cantly presents arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Hampton, 633 F.3d 334, 337-42 & n. 4 (5th Cir.2011), which held that 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) does not require aggregation of imprisonment imposed upon revocation of supervised release. The Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, its alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DE NIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.