Case Name: John M. MERRETT, Solomon Clayton, Jr., Cecelia A. Clayton, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. James T. MOORE, Commissioner, FDLE, Leonard Mellon, Exec. Director, Florida Dept. of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles, Lawrence Crow, Chief, Lakeland Police Dept., Jerald Vaughn, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1996-02-26
Citations: 77 F.3d 1304
Docket Number: No. 93-2510
Parties: John M. MERRETT, Solomon Clayton, Jr., Cecelia A. Clayton, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. James T. MOORE, Commissioner, FDLE, Leonard Mellon, Exec. Director, Florida Dept. of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles, Lawrence Crow, Chief, Lakeland Police Dept., Jerald Vaughn, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 77
Pages: 1304–1308

Head Matter:
John M. MERRETT, Solomon Clayton, Jr., Cecelia A. Clayton, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. James T. MOORE, Commissioner, FDLE, Leonard Mellon, Exec. Director, Florida Dept. of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles, Lawrence Crow, Chief, Lakeland Police Dept., Jerald Vaughn, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 93-2510.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Feb. 26, 1996.
Edward W. Stafman, Stafman & Friedlan-der, Tallahassee, FL, for appellants.
Charlie McCoy, James A. Peters, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dept, of Legal Affairs, Tallahassee, FL, for Mellon, Butterworth and Dempsey.
John P. Booth, Asst. General Counsel, Charlie McCoy, Fla. Dept, of Law Enforcement, Tallahassee, FL, for Moore & Dempsey.
Reynolds E. Pitts, Jr., Fuller, Johnson & Farrell, P.A., Pensacola, FL, Patrick J. Farrell, Robert W. Ritsch, Fuller, Johnson & Farrell, P.A., Tallahassee, FL, for Cities of Lakeland, Mailtand & Largo Police Depts., Crow, Doyle, Vaughn and Ervin.

Opinion:
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The Court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the Court and a majority of the Circuit Judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor of it (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; 'Eleventh Circuit Rule 35-5), the Suggestion of Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.