Case Name: MEMPHIS PLANNED PARENTHOOD, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Don SUNDQUIST, Governor, of the State of Tennessee, et al., Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1999-08-13
Citations: 184 F.3d 600
Docket Number: No. 97-6239
Parties: MEMPHIS PLANNED PARENTHOOD, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Don SUNDQUIST, Governor, of the State of Tennessee, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: BEFORE: KEITH, NELSON, and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 184
Pages: 600–608

Head Matter:
MEMPHIS PLANNED PARENTHOOD, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Don SUNDQUIST, Governor, of the State of Tennessee, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
No. 97-6239.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Aug. 13, 1999.
BEFORE: KEITH, NELSON, and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
The court having received a petition for rehearing en banc, and the petition having been circulated not only to the original panel members but also to all other active judges of this court, and less than a majority of the judges having favored the sug- gestión, the petition for rehearing has been referred to the original panel.
The panel has further reviewed the petition for rehearing and concludes that the issues raised in the petition were fully-considered upon the original submission and decision of the case. Accordingly, the petition is denied.