Case Name: Jeffrey HUDACEK, Claimant/Respondent, v. ST. LOUIS COUNTY, Employer/Appellant, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-03-23
Citations: 130 S.W.3d 720
Docket Number: No. ED 83206
Parties: Jeffrey HUDACEK, Claimant/Respondent, v. ST. LOUIS COUNTY, Employer/Appellant, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent.
Judges: Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 130
Pages: 720–720

Head Matter:
Jeffrey HUDACEK, Claimant/Respondent, v. ST. LOUIS COUNTY, Employer/Appellant, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent.
No. ED 83206.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
March 23, 2004.
Jeffrey Hudacek, St. Louis, MO, Claimant Acting pro se.
Patricia Redington, County Counselor, Luke El Meiners, Clayton, MO, for appellant.
Alan J. Downs, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Employer, St. Louis County, appeals from an order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission finding claimant, Jeffrey Hudacek, eligible for unemployment benefits.
The order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).