Case Name: Daniel Perez ECHEVERRIA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1975-06-24
Citations: 519 F.2d 1373
Docket Number: No. 73-2186
Parties: Daniel Perez ECHEVERRIA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 519
Pages: 1373–1374

Head Matter:
Daniel Perez ECHEVERRIA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.
No. 73-2186.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
June 24, 1975.
Robert B. Johnston, California Rural Legal Assistance, El Centro, Cal., for petitioner.
Harry D. Steward, U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., Henry Petersen, Asst. Atty. Gen., Crim. Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Bernard Hornbach, Atty., Immigration and Naturalization Service, San Francisco, Cal., Joseph Sureck, Regional Atty., Immigration and Naturalization Service, Terminal Island, San Pedro, Cal., for respondent.
Before DUNIWAY, HUFSTEDLER and TRASK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
On February 27, 1974, in the above case, No. 73-2186, we reversed the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals upon the authority of Lee Fook Chuey v. INS, 9 Cir., 1970, 439 F.2d 244.
The Supreme Court on March 31, 1975, in No. 73-1917, granted certiorari, vacated the judgment and remanded the case to us for further consideration in the light of Reid v. INS, 420 U.S. 619, 95 S.Ct. 1164, 43 L.Ed.2d 501 (1975).
In all material respects, this case is like the case of Guel-Perales v. INS, 9 Cir., 1975, 519 F.2d 1372, decided today. In response to the remand of the Supreme Court, and for the reasons stated in Guel-Perales, we conclude that the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals must be, and it is
Affirmed.