Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. KENNETH RAT WALKER, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1972-01-06
Citations: 7 Or. App. 570
Docket Number: No. 101930
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. KENNETH RAT WALKER, Appellant.
Judges: Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Langtry and Thornton, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 7
Pages: 570–570

Head Matter:
Argued December 2, 1971,
reversed and remanded January 6, 1972
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. KENNETH RAT WALKER, Appellant.
(No. 101930)
492 P2d 801
Allan H. Coons, Eugene, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Coons & Malagon, Eugene.
John W. Osburn, Solicitor General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Lee Johnson, Attorney General, Salem.
Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Langtry and Thornton, Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This case presents the same question as State v. Bishop, 7 Or App 558, 492 P2d 509 (1972). For the reasons stated in Bishop, we conclude: (1) the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to grant a motion to exclude witnesses in that the record contains no reason for this refusal; and (2) we cannot affirmatively say that the defendant was not prejudiced thereby.
Reversed and remanded.