Case Name: Clarissa Urias INZUNZA, aka Clariza Urias-Inzunza, Petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-04-18
Citations: 648 F. App'x 682
Docket Number: No. 13-72341
Parties: Clarissa Urias INZUNZA, aka Clariza Urias-Inzunza, Petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: D.W. NELSON, O’SCANNLAIN, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 648
Pages: 682–682

Head Matter:
Clarissa Urias INZUNZA, aka Clariza Urias-Inzunza, Petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 13-72341.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 12, 2016.
Filed April 18, 2016.
Clariza Urias-Inzunza, Matthew Harrison Green, Esquire, Law Offices of Matthew H. Green, Tucson, AZ, for Petitioner.
Tim Ramnitz, Trial, OIL, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
Before: D.W. NELSON, O’SCANNLAIN, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
ORDER
Urias Inzunza petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' decision that she was not entitled to a favorable exercise of discretion in connection with her application for cancellation of removal. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i) precludes judicial review of such a determination.
PETITION DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Circuit Rule 36-3.