Case Name: Debra CARTER, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Derrick CARTER, Respondent/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-12-26
Citations: 34 S.W.3d 852
Docket Number: No. ED 76758
Parties: Debra CARTER, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Derrick CARTER, Respondent/Appellant.
Judges: Before MOONEY, P.J., SIMON, J., and SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 34
Pages: 852–853

Head Matter:
Debra CARTER, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Derrick CARTER, Respondent/Appellant.
No. ED 76758.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Dec. 26, 2000..
Sandford J. Miller, Michael P. Steeno, Law Office of Miller & Steeno, Clayton, for Appellant.
Michelle S. House-Connaghan, Barbara L. Greenberg, Law Offices of Green, Cor-donnier & House LLP, St. Louis, for Respondent.
Before MOONEY, P.J., SIMON, J., and SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Derrick Carter (Appellant) appeals the trial court's judgment granting Debra Carter's (Respondent) Motion to Modify in part, and denying Appellant's Cross Motion to Modify. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).