Case Name: Keith CAMPBELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J.C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-01-22
Citations: 709 F. App'x 208
Docket Number: No. 17-2197
Parties: Keith CAMPBELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J.C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 709
Pages: 208–208

Head Matter:
Keith CAMPBELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J.C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 17-2197
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: January 18, 2018
Decided: January 22, 2018
Keith Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. Mar-yan Alexander, Brigitte Joelle Smith, WILSON ELSER MOSKOWITZ EDEL-MAN & DICKER LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Keith Campbell appeals the magistrate judge's order denying his motion to withdraw the stipulation of dismissal of his negligence action. After the parties reached a settlement agreement, Campbell unsuccessfully moved to reopen the case, asserting that he had felt undue pressure to settle. For the first time on appeal, Campbell challenges the propriety of comments made by a different magistrate judge during a settlement conference. This claim is unpreserved and, in any event, lacks evidentiary support. Because Campbell proffers no viable challenge to the enforceability of the settlement agreement, we affirm the magistrate judge's order. See Campbell v. J.C. Penney Corp., No. 8:16-cv-03820-WGC (D. Md. Sept. 18, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (2012) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73.