Case Name: Thomas M. EDDY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2011-03-08
Citations: 333 S.W.3d 530
Docket Number: No. ED 95097
Parties: Thomas M. EDDY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 333
Pages: 530–531

Head Matter:
Thomas M. EDDY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 95097.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
March 8, 2011.
Lisa M. Stroup, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Dora A. Fichter, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Thomas M. Eddy (Movant), alleging he received ineffective assistance from his plea counsel, appeals from the motion court's Judgment & Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law denying his motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find Movant is entitled to no relief on appeal. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential or precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the trial court's judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).