Case Name: Mary Frances MCCLINTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. F. SCHUMACHER & COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-05-16
Citations: 131 F. App'x 911
Docket Number: No. 05-1039
Parties: Mary Frances MCCLINTON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. F. SCHUMACHER & COMPANY, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 131
Pages: 911–912

Head Matter:
Mary Frances MCCLINTON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. F. SCHUMACHER & COMPANY, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 05-1039.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 29, 2005.
Decided: May 16, 2005.
Mary Frances McClinton, Appellant pro se.
Ingrid Blackwelder Erwin, Franklin Greene, Jackson Lewis, L.L.P., Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Mary Frances McClinton appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant in her civil action alleging discrimination in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See McClinton v. F. Schumacher & Co., No. CA-04-738-22BD (D.S.C. Dec. 15, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED