Case Name: Edna S. Wilson et al., complainants-appellants, v. George L. Vogel, defendant-respondent
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1918-03-04
Citations: 88 N.J. Eq. 598
Docket Number: 
Parties: Edna S. Wilson et al., complainants-appellants, v. George L. Vogel, defendant-respondent.
Judges: For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker; Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor — 13.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 88
Pages: 598–598

Head Matter:
Edna S. Wilson et al., complainants-appellants, v. George L. Vogel, defendant-respondent.
[Decided March 4th, 1918.]
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Lane, whose opinion is reported in 87 N. J. Fq. S8J/..
Messrs. Riker & Riker, for the appellants.
Mr. Arthur R. Denman, for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lane.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker; Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor — 13.
For reversal — None.