Case Name: Chavis ZEIGLER, et al., Petitioners, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2007-04-05
Citations: 955 So. 2d 532
Docket Number: No. SC06-589
Parties: Chavis ZEIGLER, et al., Petitioners, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: LEWIS, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 955
Pages: 532–532

Head Matter:
Chavis ZEIGLER, et al., Petitioners, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. SC06-589.
Supreme Court of Florida.
April 5, 2007.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender and Phil Patterson and Robert D. Baker, Assistant Public Defenders, Second Judicial Circuit, Tallahassee, FL, for Petitioner.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Robert R. Wheeler, Bureau Chief Criminal Appeals, and Daniel A. David, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, FL, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted review of the decision in Zeigler v. State, 922 So.2d 384 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006), based on alleged express and direct conflict with State v. Diaz, 850 So.2d 435 (Fla.2003), Moody v. State, 842 So.2d 754 (Fla.2003), and Fitzpatrick v. State, 900 So.2d 495 (Fla.2005). Upon further consideration, we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss this review proceeding.
It is so ordered.
LEWIS, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.