Case Name: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL MEDICAL HOSPITAL OF MODESTO, INC., d/b/a Doctors Hospital of Modesto, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1975-11-26
Citations: 528 F.2d 938
Docket Number: No. 74-2636
Parties: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL MEDICAL HOSPITAL OF MODESTO, INC., d/b/a Doctors Hospital of Modesto, Respondent.
Judges: Before BROWNING and TRASK, Circuit Judges, and SWEIGERT, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 528
Pages: 938–941

Head Matter:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL MEDICAL HOSPITAL OF MODESTO, INC., d/b/a Doctors Hospital of Modesto, Respondent.
No. 74-2636.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Nov. 26, 1975.
Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied Feb. 10, 1976.
Marjorie Gofreed (argued), N. L. R. B., San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner.
James J. Meyers (argued), Littler, Mendelson & Fastiff, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent.
Honorable William T. Sweigert, Senior United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
OPINION
Before BROWNING and TRASK, Circuit Judges, and SWEIGERT, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
The reasons for the Board's order are briefly but adequately stated in its decisions in this unfair labor practice proceeding (210 NLRB No. 117) and the underlying representation proceeding. They have support in the record and reflect a reasonable interpretation of the statute. See NLRB v. Staiman Bros., 466 F.2d 564, 566 (3rd Cir. 1972); NLRB v. Pacific Gamble Robinson Co., 438 F.2d 112, 113 (9th Cir. 1971); Westchester Plastics of Ohio, Inc. v. NLRB, 401 F.2d 903, 908 (6th Cir. 1968); Trailmobile Division Pullman, Inc. v. NLRB, 379 F.2d 419, 423 (5th Cir. 1967).
The Board's order will be enforced.