Case Name: Arthur C. Platt, Appellant, v. Seymour W. Bonsall et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1913-11-18
Citations: 209 N.Y. 584
Docket Number: 
Parties: Arthur C. Platt, Appellant, v. Seymour W. Bonsall et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 209
Pages: 584–585

Head Matter:
Arthur C. Platt, Appellant, v. Seymour W. Bonsall et al., Respondents.
Platt v. Bonsall, 143 App. Div. 112, appeal dismissed.
(Argued October 31, 1918 ;
decided November 18, 1913.)
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered February 1Í, 1911, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and granting a new trial in an action for malicious prosecution.
The following questions were certified: “First. Did the trial court err in denying defendants’ motion for nonsuit made upon the ground that there was prohable cause for bringing the action for conversion ?
“ Second. Was the admission in evidence of the judgment roll and the judge’s charge to the jury in the Federal court action hurtful error and ground for reversal ?
“ Third. Was it error for the trial court to allow plaintiff to prove the amount of profits drawn from the business during the plaintiff’s connection with it ? ”
Robert B. Honeyman and A. Parker Smith for appellant.
Adam K. Strieker for respondents.

Opinion:
Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Culler, Ch. J., Gray, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase, Hogar and Miller, JJ.