Case Name: William C. Glass, petitioner-respondent, v. Euphemia M. Glass, defendant-appellant
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1926-05-17
Citations: 99 N.J. Eq. 884
Docket Number: 
Parties: William C. Glass, petitioner-respondent, v. Euphemia M. Glass, defendant-appellant,
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 99
Pages: 884–884

Head Matter:
William C. Glass, petitioner-respondent, v. Euphemia M. Glass, defendant-appellant,
[Submitted February 13th, 1926.
Decided May 17th, 1926.]
Mr. Merritt Lane and Messrs. Peck, Davis & Gray, for the appellant.
Messrs. Tiffany, Brugler & Wittreich (Mr. G. Earle Brugler, of counsel), for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We have examined with care the evidence in this case, in the light of the argument of counsel, and are satisfied that the decree is fully supported by the evidence and is right. The decree will therefore be affirmed.
For affirmance — Tebhci-iakd, Paekee, Kalisch, Black, Katzefbach, Campbell, White, Gaedfeb, Vaf Buskiek, MoGlekfof, Kays, Heteield, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.