Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Leroy Keith, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1959-03-13
Citations: 5 N.Y.2d 1037
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Leroy Keith, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 5
Pages: 1037–1039

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Leroy Keith, Appellant.
Argued October 16, 1958;
reargued February 23, 1959;
decided March 13, 1959.
Herbert S. Siegal and Solon S. Kane for appellant.
Daniel V. Sullivan, District Attorney (Irving Anolik, Walter E. Dillon and Andrew C. McCarthy of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
Upon reargument, judgment of conviction affirmed in the folloAving memorandum: ' ' Assuming that the alleged dying declaration of the victim, a copy of which has been furnished to counsel for appellant, was made in expectation of immediate death and after hope of recovery had been abandoned, it is so unclear and self contradictory that one cannot know that the person who took this stenographic statement was actually in communication with the dying man, who could not speak, and is supposed to have responded to questions merely by shaking his head affirmatively or negatively. If the statement is of any significance, it tends to implicate defendant in the crime charged rather than to exculpate him. Although the Trial Judge should have directed that this statement be produced for the inspection of counsel for the defendant during the trial, failure to do so or omission to receive it in evidence could not have prejudiced defendant." No opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Conway and Judges Desmond, Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis and Burke.