Case Name: H. T. MAHONEY, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendent-Appellee; Ruby Thelma Loftis PIERCE, etc., Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1964-12-17
Citations: 339 F.2d 605
Docket Number: Nos. 15819, 15820
Parties: H. T. MAHONEY, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendent-Appellee. Ruby Thelma Loftis PIERCE, etc., Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 339
Pages: 605–605

Head Matter:
H. T. MAHONEY, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendent-Appellee. Ruby Thelma Loftis PIERCE, etc., Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
Nos. 15819, 15820.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
Dec. 17, 1964.
H. Calvin Walter, Knoxville, Tenn., Walter, Gilbertson & Claiborne, Knoxville, Tenn., of counsel, for appellants.
J. F. Bishop, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., John W. Douglas, Asst. Atty. Gen., Morton Hollander, Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., John H. Reddy, U. S. Atty., Knoxville, Tenn., on brief, for appellee.
Before WEICK, Chief Judge, PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge, and McALLISTER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
These appeals came on to be heard and v?ere submitted to the Court on oral arguments, briefs and records.
The issues raised are largely factual in nature and received careful consideration in the District Court. We think there was substantial evidence to support the findings of fact of the District Judge and they are not eleai'ly erroneous.
The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed for the reasons and upon the ground set forth in the excellent opinion of Chief Judge Robert L. Taylor, reported in 220 F.Supp. 823,.