Case Name: Toledo Bar Association v. Christensen
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1996-11-06
Citations: 77 Ohio St. 3d 71
Docket Number: No. 96-1427
Parties: Toledo Bar Association v. Christensen.
Judges: Mover, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Stratton, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 77
Pages: 71–72

Head Matter:
Toledo Bar Association v. Christensen.
[Cite as Toledo Bar Assn. v. Christensen (1996), 77 Ohio St.3d 71.]
(No. 96-1427
Submitted September 10, 1996
Decided November 6, 1996.)
Deborah K. Rump and Harold M. Steinberg, for relator.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We adopt the findings of fact of the board. Further, we conclude that respondent has engaged in conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness to practice law in violation of DR 1-102(A)(6) by (1) undertaking the representation of Good when he had failed to comply with the registration requirements of Gov.Bar R. VI, (2) failing to comply with the sanctions imposed for not meeting the continuing legal education requirements of Gov.Bar R. X, and (3) failing to cooperate with the grievance investigation as required by Gov.Bar R. V(4)(G). Therefore, respondent is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Mover, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Stratton, JJ., concur.
Cook, J., dissents.
Douglas, J., not participating.