Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Moises HUIZAR-FLORES, a.k.a. Moises Flores Huizar, a.k.a. Moises Huizar, a.k.a. Moses Huizar, a.k.a. Ranato Huizar, a.k.a. Moises Huizar-Martinez, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-02-05
Citations: 592 F. App'x 608
Docket Number: No. 14-10012
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Moises HUIZAR-FLORES, a.k.a. Moises Flores Huizar, a.k.a. Moises Huizar, a.k.a. Moses Huizar, a.k.a. Ranato Huizar, a.k.a. Moises Huizar-Martinez, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 592
Pages: 608–609

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Moises HUIZAR-FLORES, a.k.a. Moises Flores Huizar, a.k.a. Moises Huizar, a.k.a. Moses Huizar, a.k.a. Ranato Huizar, a.k.a. Moises Huizar-Martinez, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 14-10012.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 30, 2014.
Filed Feb. 5, 2015.
Mark S. Kokanovich, USPX-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Florence Bruemmer, Law Offices of Florence M. Bruemmer, PC, Anthem, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Moisés Huizar-Flores, Pecos, TX, pro se.
Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Moisés Huizar-Flores appeals from the district court's judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 46-month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Huizar-Flores's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Huizar-Flores the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Huizar-Flores has waived his right to appeal his reentry of a removed alien conviction and 46-month sentence. Because the record discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the appeal waiver, we dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir.2009).
Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.