Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ALEJANDRO ADRIAN URENO-ALVAREZ, aka Alejandro Adrian Alvarez, aka Alejandro Ureno Alvarez, aka Ureno Alyandro Alvarez, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2008-05-28
Citations: 220 Or. App. 301
Docket Number: CF060045; A133116
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ALEJANDRO ADRIAN URENO-ALVAREZ, aka Alejandro Adrian Alvarez, aka Alejandro Ureno Alvarez, aka Ureno Alyandro Alvarez, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Sercombe, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 220
Pages: 301–302

Head Matter:
Submitted April 4,
reversed and remanded for entry of a single conviction for first-degree failure to appear and for resentencing May 28, 2008
STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ALEJANDRO ADRIAN URENO-ALVAREZ, aka Alejandro Adrian Alvarez, aka Alejandro Ureno Alvarez, aka Ureno Alyandro Alvarez, Defendant-Appellant.
Umatilla County Circuit Court
CF060045; A133116
185 P3d 556
Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, Legal Services Division, and Meredith Allen, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Michael R. Washington, Senior Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Sercombe, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant signed a release agreement in which he agreed to appear in court on a single date and time for four different pending cases. He failed to appear as required by the release agreement and was charged with two counts of first-degree failure to appear, ORS 162.205, and two counts of second-degree failure to appear, ORS 162.195. After a trial to the court, defendant was convicted on all four counts, and the court entered judgment for four separate convictions. On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court erred in failing to merge the four convictions into a single conviction for first-degree failure to appear, because defendant violated a single release agreement. The state concedes that, under State v. Camarena-Velasco, 207 Or App 19, 139 P3d 979 (2006), the trial court erred in failing to merge the convictions into a single conviction for first-degree failure to appear. We agree and accept the concession.
Reversed and remanded for entry of a single conviction for first-degree failure to appear and for resentencing.