Case Name: Kelvin REED, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2006-03-17
Citations: 927 So. 2d 954
Docket Number: No. 5D05-1741
Parties: Kelvin REED, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SHARP, W., PALMER, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 927
Pages: 954–954

Head Matter:
Kelvin REED, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D05-1741.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
March 17, 2006.
Rehearing Denied May 9, 2006.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Tomislav D. Golik, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeffrey R. Casey, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Chandler v. State, 702 So.2d 186, 197-198 (Fla.1997) (recognizing prior consistent statements are considered non-hearsay if the following conditions are met: the person who made the prior consistent statement testifies at trial and is subject to cross-examination concerning that statement; and the statement is offered to rebut an express or implied charge of improper influence, motive, or recent fabrication, citing Rodriguez v. State, 609 So.2d 493, 499 (Fla.1992)).
SHARP, W., PALMER, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.