Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Dwayne CHANDLER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-08-18
Citations: 331 F. App'x 332
Docket Number: No. 08-41368
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Dwayne CHANDLER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 331
Pages: 332–332

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Dwayne CHANDLER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-41368.
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 18, 2009.
Ernest Gonzalez, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Plano, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Sunshine Swallers, Katine & Nechman, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Dwayne Chandler, Yazoo City, MS, pro se.
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Dwayne Chandler has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Chandler has filed a response. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Chandler's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; such claims generally "cannot be resolved on direct appeal when they have not been raised before the district court since no opportunity existed to develop the record on the merits of the allegations." United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir.2006) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Our independent review of the record, counsel's brief, and Chandler's response discloses no nonfrivo-lous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Chandler's motion for appointment of substitute counsel is DENIED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5'm Cm R. 47.5.4.