Case Name: Marshall Christopher LONG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1986-11-26
Citations: 498 So. 2d 570
Docket Number: No. 84-1369
Parties: Marshall Christopher LONG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SHARP and COWART, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 498
Pages: 570–571

Head Matter:
Marshall Christopher LONG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 84-1369.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Nov. 26, 1986.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Lucinda H. Young, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Sean Daly, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
DAUKSCH, Judge.
This matter is before this court after remand "for consideration in light of DiGuilio." Long v. State, 494 So.2d 213 (Fla.1986).
It is our determination that there is a reasonable possibility the prosecutor's comments, see original opinion Long v. State, 469 So.2d 1 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985), were such that the error affected the verdict and that appellant is entitled to a new trial. So, the judgment is reversed and this cause remanded for new trial.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
SHARP and COWART, JJ., concur.
. State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).