Case Name: John THOMAS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2015-06-09
Citations: 463 S.W.3d 463
Docket Number: No. ED 101603
Parties: John THOMAS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent.
Judges: Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 463
Pages: 463–464

Head Matter:
John THOMAS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent.
No. ED 101603
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Filed: June 9, 2015
Amanda Page Faerber, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Movant/Appellant.
Rachel S. Flaster, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent/Respondent.
Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
John Thomas appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Brooks v. State, 242 S.W.3d 705, 708 (Mo.banc 2008). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P. 2013, unless otherwise noted.