Case Name: DADE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Appellant, v. Elva A. McCAHILL, a widow, et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1959-08-24
Citations: 114 So. 2d 9
Docket Number: No. 59-124
Parties: DADE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Appellant, v. Elva A. McCAHILL, a widow, et al., Appellees.
Judges: HORTON, C. J., and PEARSON and CARROLL, CHAS., JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 114
Pages: 9–10

Head Matter:
DADE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Appellant, v. Elva A. McCAHILL, a widow, et al., Appellees.
No. 59-124.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
Aug. 24, 1959.
Rehearing Denied Sept. 4, 1959.
Darrey A. Davis and Thomas C. Brit-ton, Miami, for appellant.
Walter J. Migoski, Miami, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appeal in this case challenges that part of a judgment in eminent domain which is for certain attorney's fees allowed to the attorney for appellees, based on a directed verdict therefor. The facts and questions involved are similar to those raised and considered on the cross-appeal in Romy v. Dade County, Fla.App. 1959, 114 So.2d 8, decided this date. On authority of that case the judgment is reversed in part, that is, as to the allowance of such attorney fees, and the cause remanded for a new trial only as to the said attorney fees.
It is so ordered.
HORTON, C. J., and PEARSON and CARROLL, CHAS., JJ., concur.