Case Name: HARRY D. SCHADEL, RESPONDENT, v. IGNATZ HONIG, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1926-10-18
Citations: 103 N.J.L. 203
Docket Number: 
Parties: HARRY D. SCHADEL, RESPONDENT, v. IGNATZ HONIG, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 103
Pages: 203–203

Head Matter:
HARRY D. SCHADEL, RESPONDENT, v. IGNATZ HONIG, APPELLANT.
Submitted May 28, 1926
Decided October 18, 1926.
For the appellant, Michael Breitkopf.
For the respondent, Frank G. Turner.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trenchard, KaLISCH, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.