Case Name: James WARD, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-08-01
Citations: 903 S.W.2d 659
Docket Number: No. 67426
Parties: James WARD, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 903
Pages: 659–659

Head Matter:
James WARD, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. 67426.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Aug. 1, 1995.
Nancy L. Vincent, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Fernando Bermudez, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant appeals from the motion court's denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).