Case Name: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. MATTHEW J. HALE, JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1972-09-19
Citations: 120 N.J. Super. 469
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. MATTHEW J. HALE, JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 120
Pages: 469–470

Head Matter:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. MATTHEW J. HALE, JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Submitted September 11, 1972
Decided September 19, 1972.
.Before Judges Coldestek, Leonabd and Halpebn.
Mr. George H. Barbour, attorney for appellant.
Mr. George F. Kugler, Jr., Attorney. General of New Jersey, attorney for respondent (Mr. Fred H. Eumpf, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel and on the brief).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons expressed by Judge Martino, 116 N. J. Super. 106 (Law Div. 1971).