Case Name: Thomas WILSON and Carolyn Wilson, Appellees, v. James P. FERRELL, individually and officially of Hudson County Prosecutor's Office; William J. Flannery, individually and officially of the Hudson County Prosecutor's Office; John Hill, individually and officially of the Hudson County Prosecutor's Office; George F. Accomondo, individually and officially of the Port Authority Police Department; James O'Neill, individually and officially of the Port Authority Police Department, Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1984-07-13
Citations: 738 F.2d 637
Docket Number: No. 83-1952
Parties: Thomas WILSON and Carolyn Wilson, Appellees, v. James P. FERRELL, individually and officially of Hudson County Prosecutor’s Office; William J. Flannery, individually and officially of the Hudson County Prosecutor’s Office; John Hill, individually and officially of the Hudson County Prosecutor’s Office; George F. Accomondo, individually and officially of the Port Authority Police Department; James O’Neill, individually and officially of the Port Authority Police Department, Appellants.
Judges: Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 738
Pages: 637–638

Head Matter:
Thomas WILSON and Carolyn Wilson, Appellees, v. James P. FERRELL, individually and officially of Hudson County Prosecutor’s Office; William J. Flannery, individually and officially of the Hudson County Prosecutor’s Office; John Hill, individually and officially of the Hudson County Prosecutor’s Office; George F. Accomondo, individually and officially of the Port Authority Police Department; James O’Neill, individually and officially of the Port Authority Police Department, Appellants.
No. 83-1952.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Argued March 5, 1984.
Decided July 13, 1984.
James L. Mann, II, Columbia, S.C. (Mann & Rickborn, Columbia, S.C., James M. Shoemaker, Jr., Frank S. Holleman, III, Wyche, Burgess, Freeman & Parham, Greenville, S.C., on brief), for appellants,
Fletcher N. Smith, Jr., Greenville, S.C. (Theo W. Mitchell, Mitchell, Smith & Pauling, Greenville, S.C., on brief), for appellees.
Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Upon further consideration of the facts, issues, and course of proceedings to date in this action, we are of opinion that permission to appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) was improvidently granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
We have been advised that the claims of the Wilsons against appellants Accomondo and O'Neill have been settled, but do not act on their motion for dismissal under Fed.R.App.P. 42(b) because the entire appeal has been dismissed. The parties should notify the district court of their settlement agreement for entry of an appropriate order in that court.