Case Name: FAMILY SNACKS, INC. d/b/a Guy's Foods, Employer/Appellant, v. Sheryl CRADER, Employee/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-12-08
Citations: 982 S.W.2d 759
Docket Number: No. ED 74418
Parties: FAMILY SNACKS, INC. d/b/a Guy’s Foods, Employer/Appellant, v. Sheryl CRADER, Employee/Respondent.
Judges: Before HOFF, P.J. and GARY M. GAERTNER and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 982
Pages: 759–760

Head Matter:
FAMILY SNACKS, INC. d/b/a Guy’s Foods, Employer/Appellant, v. Sheryl CRADER, Employee/Respondent.
No. ED 74418.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Dec. 8, 1998.
W. Terrence Kilroy, Richard M. Paul, III, Linda J. Sheppard, Shughart Thomson & Kilroy, P.C., Kansas City, for appellant.
Aan J. Downs, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before HOFF, P.J. and GARY M. GAERTNER and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Family Snacks, Inc. d/b/a Guy's Foods (Employer) appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's (Commission) award of unemployment benefits to Sheryl Crader (Employee).
We have reviewed the brief of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. The Commission's award is supported by substantial and competent evidence on the whole record. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).