Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Warren Lamont LITTLE, a/k/a Pete, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-02-14
Citations: 3 F. App'x 122
Docket Number: No. 00-7454
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Warren Lamont LITTLE, a/k/a Pete, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINS, DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 3
Pages: 122–122

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Warren Lamont LITTLE, a/k/a Pete, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 00-7454.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 8, 2001.
Decided Feb. 14, 2001.
Warren Lamont Little, pro se. David Bernard Smith, Greensboro, NC, for appellee.
Before WILKINS, DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Warren Lamont Little appeals from the district court's order denying his Fed. R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Little, No. CR-95-146 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 19, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.