Case Name: Phyllis E. TOSTON, Appellant, v. MISSOURI DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-02-07
Citations: 125 F. App'x 82
Docket Number: No. 04-1737
Parties: Phyllis E. TOSTON, Appellant, v. MISSOURI DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Appellee.
Judges: Before BYE, RILEY, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 125
Pages: 82–83

Head Matter:
Phyllis E. TOSTON, Appellant, v. MISSOURI DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Appellee.
No. 04-1737.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 4, 2005.
Decided Feb. 7, 2005.
Phyllis E. Toston, pro se.
Maureen C. Beekley, Attorney General’s Office, St. Louis, MO, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before BYE, RILEY, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Phyllis Toston appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment in this Title VII action Toston brought against her former employer, the Missouri Division of Employment Security. Following careful review, we agree with the district court that Toston presented nothing in support of her bare allegation that her employer's legitimate reason for terminating her—poor performance—was a pretext for race discrimination, see Riggs v. Kansas City Mo. Pub. Sch. Dist., 385 F.3d 1164, 1166 (8th Cir.2004), or retaliation, see Griffith v. City of Des Moines, 387 F.3d 733, 738 (8th Cir.2004). In addition, to the extent she pleaded a hostile-work-environment claim, Toston failed to show harassment pervasive or severe enough to affect a term, condition, or privilege of her employment. See id. at 739. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Henry E. Autrey, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.