Case Name: Sandra Lee GARDNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Melvin Charles GARDNER, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-11-21
Citations: 51 F. App'x 681
Docket Number: No. 02-35345; D.C. No. CV-02-00001-AAM
Parties: Sandra Lee GARDNER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Melvin Charles GARDNER, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 51
Pages: 681–682

Head Matter:
Sandra Lee GARDNER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Melvin Charles GARDNER, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 02-35345.
D.C. No. CV-02-00001-AAM.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 18, 2002.
Decided Nov. 21, 2002.
Before REINHARDT, RYMER and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously Ends this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Sandra Lee Gardner appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of her action against her former husband, Melvin C. Gardner, and the district court's denial of her motion for reconsideration.
The district court correctly found that because the claims in Sandra Gardner's complaint were inextricably intertwined with the state court dissolution proceedings, it lacked jurisdiction over the action under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 483 n. 16, 485-86, 103 S.Ct. 1303, 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983); Olson Farms, Inc. v. Barbosa, 134 F.3d 933, 936 (9th Cir.1998).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.