Case Name: In the Matter of R. S., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. R. S., Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2013-11-27
Citations: 259 Or. App. 653
Docket Number: 130463688; A154234
Parties: In the Matter of R. S., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. R. S., Appellant.
Judges: Before Schuman, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Duncan, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 259
Pages: 653–654

Head Matter:
Submitted October 4,
reversed November 27, 2013
In the Matter of R. S., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. R. S., Appellant.
Multnomah County Circuit Court
130463688; A154234
315 P3d 446
Garrett A. Richardson and Multnomah Defenders, Inc., filed the brief for appellant.
Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General, and David B. Thompson, Senior Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Schuman, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Duncan, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that, contrary to the trial court's ruling, the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that she is unable to provide for her basic needs because of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state's concession, and reverse.
Reversed.