Case Name: HAMILTON et al. v. POLK
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1954-03-11
Citations: 211 F.2d 51
Docket Number: No. 11878
Parties: HAMILTON et al. v. POLK.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 211
Pages: 51–51

Head Matter:
HAMILTON et al. v. POLK.
No. 11878.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued Feb. 23, 1954.
Decided March 11, 1954.
Messrs. Warren E. Magee and Paul J. Sedgwick, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. R. Logan Hollowell and Vaden S. Pitts, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellants.
Mr. Joseph D. Bulman, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Sidney M. Goldstein and Curtis P. Mitchell, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for ap-pellee.
Before BAZELON, WASHINGTON and DANAHER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellants seek reversal of a judgment entered against them in a personal injury suit. We find no merit either in their main contention that the trial court abused its discretion in denying their motions to set aside the jury's verdict and to grant a new trial on the grounds of fraud and newly discovered evidence, or in the other contentions urged for reversal.
The judgment is therefore
Affirmed.