Case Name: ROSE FOLK ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. HACKENSACK WATER COMPANY, RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1939-04-21
Citations: 122 N.J.L. 381
Docket Number: 
Parties: ROSE FOLK ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. HACKENSACK WATER COMPANY, RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 122
Pages: 381–382

Head Matter:
ROSE FOLK ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. HACKENSACK WATER COMPANY, RESPONDENT.
Submitted February 17, 1939
Decided April 21, 1939.
For the appellant, Nathan Baker.
For the respondent, Samuel W. Zerman.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.