Case Name: Blake & Johnson, Respondents v. Stephen R. Krom, Appellant
Court: New York Superior Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1891-01-05
Citations: 27 Jones & S. 574
Docket Number: 
Parties: Blake & Johnson, Respondents v. Stephen R. Krom, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Reports of cases argued and determined in the Superior Court of the city of New York
Volume: 59
Pages: 574–575

Head Matter:
Blake & Johnson, Respondents v. Stephen R. Krom, Appellant.
Decided January 5, 1891.
Appeal from judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff upon a verdict directed by the trial judge, and from order denying defendant’s motion upon the minutes for a new trial.
Herbert T. Ketcham, for appellant.
Michael H. Cardozo, for respondents.
Before Sedgwick, Ch. J., Freedman and Ingraham, JJ.

Opinion:
The main question involved was as to the sufficiency of the evidence to substantiate a counterclaim. The Court (per Curiam) held the evidence insufficient, and affirmed the judgment and order, with costs.