Case Name: Irena Bakst et al., Plaintiffs, v. Valentina Lauer et al., Defendants. Irena Bakst et al., Respondents, v. Michael Lauer, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1993-06-08
Citations: 194 A.D.2d 338
Docket Number: 
Parties: Irena Bakst et al., Plaintiffs, v Valentina Lauer et al., Defendants. Irena Bakst et al., Respondents, v Michael Lauer, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 194
Pages: 338–338

Head Matter:
Irena Bakst et al., Plaintiffs, v Valentina Lauer et al., Defendants. Irena Bakst et al., Respondents, v Michael Lauer, Appellant.
[598 NYS2d 954]

Opinion:
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (C. Beauchamp Ciparick, J.), entered December 8, 1992, which denied defendant-appellant's motion for partial summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Issues of fact exist whether the substituted notes discharged appellant's obligation on the guarantee by significantly modifying the terms of the note (Reiss & Son v Silver Colt Realty Assocs., 184 AD2d 205), and how the irregular interest payments were to be applied. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Carro, Kupferman and Rubin, JJ.