Case Name: KURTELL & COMPANY, Inc., a Florida corporation, and Kurt L. Wallach, Appellants, v. MIAMI TRIBUNE, INC., a Florida corporation, d/b/a Miami Beach Daily Sun, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1967-01-10
Citations: 193 So. 2d 471
Docket Number: No. 66-304
Parties: KURTELL & COMPANY, Inc., a Florida corporation, and Kurt L. Wallach, Appellants, v. MIAMI TRIBUNE, INC., a Florida corporation, d/b/a Miami Beach Daily Sun, Appellee.
Judges: Before PEARSON and CARROLL, JJ., .and LOPEZ, AQUILINO, Jr., Associate Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 193
Pages: 471–471

Head Matter:
KURTELL & COMPANY, Inc., a Florida corporation, and Kurt L. Wallach, Appellants, v. MIAMI TRIBUNE, INC., a Florida corporation, d/b/a Miami Beach Daily Sun, Appellee.
No. 66-304.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
Jan. 10, 1967.
Milton E. Grusmark, Miami Beach, for .appellants.
Scott, McCarthy, Preston & Steel and Dwight Sullivan, Miami, for appellee.
Before PEARSON and CARROLL, JJ., .and LOPEZ, AQUILINO, Jr., Associate Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellants, who were the -plaintiffs in the trial court, appeal a final judgment dismissing their complaint claiming actionable libel by the appellee. Attached to the complaint is a copy of the article claimed to be libelous. The trial judge determined from an examination of the article that the conclusion of law contained in appellants' complaint that the article contained defamatory statements and inferences was not supported by the exhibit. The fact that plaintiffs may not like the way the article was written or what it says about them does not automatically provide the basis for a libel suit. See Mann v. Roosevelt Shop, Inc., Fla. 1949, 41 So.2d 894.
Affirmed.