Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald Elbert LEWIS, a/k/a Peptone, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-12-20
Citations: 671 F. App'x 215
Docket Number: No. 16-7113
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald Elbert LEWIS, a/k/a Peptone, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 671
Pages: 215–215

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald Elbert LEWIS, a/k/a Peptone, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-7113
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: December 15, 2016
Decided: December 20, 2016
Donald Elbert Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Seth Morgan Wood, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Donald Elbert Lewis appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for reconsideration of the court's November 2015 order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of his sentence based on Amendment 782 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 234 (4th Cir. 2010) (a district court has no authority to reconsider its decision on a sentence reduction motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED