Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Scott L. GRASS, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-10-09
Citations: 250 F. App'x 193
Docket Number: No. 06-3840
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Scott L. GRASS, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 250
Pages: 193–194

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Scott L. GRASS, Appellant.
No. 06-3840.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 4, 2007.
Filed: Oct. 9, 2007.
James E. Brown, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
Jane Pansing Brown, Asst. U.S. Atty., Kansas City, MO, for appellee.
Before BYE, RILEY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.
[UNPUBLISHED]

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Scott L. Grass appeals the 235-month prison sentence the district court imposed after he pleaded guilty to distributing more than 500 grams of methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), and 846. In a brief filed under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Grass's counsel seeks to withdraw raising as a possible issue whether the sentence is unreasonable or violative of the Eighth Amendment.
Grass pleaded guilty pursuant to a plea agreement that contained a waiver of his right to appeal the sentence. We will enforce the appeal waiver here. The record reflects that Grass understood and voluntarily accepted the terms of the plea agreement, including the appeal waiver; the appeal falls within the scope of the waiver; and no injustice would result. See United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir.2003) (en banc) (discussing enforceability of appeal waiver); United States v. Estrada-Bahena, 201 F.3d 1070, 1071 (8th Cir.2000) (per curiam) (enforcing appeal waiver in Anders case). Even if his Eighth Amendment argument could be deemed to fall within the appeal waiver's exception for an "illegal sentence," that argument has no merit. See United States v. Atteberry, 447 F.3d 562, 565 (8th Cir. 2006) (Eighth Amendment forbids only extreme sentences that are grossly disproportionate to crime; sentence within statutory limits is generally not subject to Eighth Amendment review).
Having reviewed the record independently pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), for any nonfrivolous issue not covered by the waiver, we find none. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal, and we grant counsel's motion to withdraw.
. The Honorable Otrie D. Smith, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.