Case Name: Leon L. BIVENS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-02-13
Citations: 813 So. 2d 963
Docket Number: No. 4D01-4259
Parties: Leon L. BIVENS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: KLEIN, SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 813
Pages: 963–963

Head Matter:
Leon L. BIVENS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D01-4259.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb. 13, 2002.
Leon L. Bivens, Miami, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the denial of appellant's rule 3,850 motion and certify as a question of great public importance the same question certified in Major v. State, 790 So.2d 550, 553 (Fla. 3d DCA) review granted, 797 So.2d 586 (Fla.2001).
WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?
KLEIN, SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.