Case Name: TONEFF v. STATE
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1926-08-22
Citations: 4 Ohio Law Abs. 754
Docket Number: No. 20066
Parties: TONEFF v. STATE
Judges: 
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 4
Pages: 754–755

Head Matter:
TONEFF v. STATE
No. 20066.
Supreme Court
Dock. Aug. 22, 1926;
4 Abs. 590.

Opinion:
Toneff contends in the Supreme Court that where a witness suddenly coming upon a co-conspirator, while latter is operating a still, declarations made concerning the operations and ownership of the still are not admissible in evidence.
Attorneys — Stahl & Price, Toledo, for Ton-eff; Don. Bell, Pros. Atty, Port Clinton, for State.