Case Name: Edward A. Sullivan, Jr. et al. v. Dorothy M. Spicer et al.
Court: Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Jurisdiction: Rhode Island
Decision Date: 1975-04-15
Citations: 114 R.I. 945
Docket Number: Appeal No. 73-255
Parties: Edward A. Sullivan, Jr. et al. v. Dorothy M. Spicer et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Rhode Island Reports
Volume: 114
Pages: 945–945

Head Matter:
Appeal No. 73-255.
Edward A. Sullivan, Jr. et al. v. Dorothy M. Spicer et al.
Letts, Quinn & Licht, Richard A. Licht, Alan S. Flink, for Edward A. Sullivan, Jr. Gunning, LaFazia & Gnys, Inc., Richard T. Linn, for defendants.

Opinion:
Petition for reargument is denied. The defendants based their petition for reargument on the ground that they had not waived the question as to whether or not the plaintiff's appeal should be dismissed because of failure to file a transcript as required by Super. R. Civ. P. 75(b). Assuming that the defendants are correct, this issue examined and considered and found without merit.