Case Name: George WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael SHEEDY, Warden; Janie W. Rouse; James Blackwell, Major; Kenneth Sharp, Lieutenant; Nurse Hill, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-01-28
Citations: 86 F. App'x 570
Docket Number: No. 03-7755
Parties: George WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael SHEEDY, Warden; Janie W. Rouse; James Blackwell, Major; Kenneth Sharp, Lieutenant; Nurse Hill, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 86
Pages: 570–571

Head Matter:
George WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael SHEEDY, Warden; Janie W. Rouse; James Blackwell, Major; Kenneth Sharp, Lieutenant; Nurse Hill, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 03-7755.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 15, 2004.
Decided Jan. 28, 2004.
George Williams, Appellant pro se. Norma Anne Turner Jett, Early & Ness, Bamberg, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
George Williams appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Williams v. Sheedy, No. CA-03-1439 (D.S.C. filed Oct. 3, 2003 & entered Oct. 7, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED