Case Name: Christopher ESTES, Claimant-Appellant, v. BOMMARITO HYUNDAI ISUZU, Employer-Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1996-12-24
Citations: 936 S.W.2d 590
Docket Number: No. 70466
Parties: Christopher ESTES, Claimant-Appellant, v. BOMMARITO HYUNDAI ISUZU, Employer-Respondent.
Judges: Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 936
Pages: 590–590

Head Matter:
Christopher ESTES, Claimant-Appellant, v. BOMMARITO HYUNDAI ISUZU, Employer-Respondent.
No. 70466.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Dec. 24, 1996.
Sheldon Weinstein, St. Louis, for claimant-appellant.
Steven R. Sharp, St. Louis, for employer-respondent.
Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Christopher Estes appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the Administrative Law Judge's denial of benefits. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detañed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).