Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lorenzo MILLAN-JAIMES, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-04-15
Citations: 61 F. App'x 420
Docket Number: No. 02-10129; D.C. No. CR-01-00896-EHC
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lorenzo MILLAN-JAIMES, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before RYMER, KLEINFELD and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 61
Pages: 420–421

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lorenzo MILLAN-JAIMES, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-10129.
D.C. No. CR-01-00896-EHC.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 7, 2003.
Decided April 15, 2003.
Before RYMER, KLEINFELD and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Lorenzo Millan-Jaimes appeals his 41-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction to illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Millan-Jaimes's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no arguable issues for review, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Millan-Jaimes has filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Our examination of the briefs and independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no issues warranting review. Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.