Case Name: Joseph B. Crampton, Doing Business as Crampton Realty Company, Appellant, v. Morris Bowers et al., Individually and as Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Bowers & Effron, et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1957-10-28
Citations: 4 A.D.2d 884
Docket Number: 
Parties: Joseph B. Crampton, Doing Business as Crampton Realty Company, Appellant, v. Morris Bowers et al., Individually and as Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Bowers & Effron, et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 4
Pages: 884–884

Head Matter:
(October 28, 1957)
Joseph B. Crampton, Doing Business as Crampton Realty Company, Appellant, v. Morris Bowers et al., Individually and as Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Bowers & Effron, et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Opinion:
Appeal from a resettled order granting respondents' motion, pursuant to section 124 of the Civil Practice Act, to cancel a notice of pendency of action upon the giving of an undertaking. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Bienstoak v. Nista Constr. Co. (225 App. Div. 534), relied on by appellant was decided prior to the amendment of section 124 in 1930. (Cf. 63rd St. Theatres v. Mansion Estates, 137 Mise. 285, affd. 230 App. Div. 827.) Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Murphy, Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.