Case Name: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. CANNON MFG. CORPORATION et al.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1949-10-12
Citations: 177 F.2d 197
Docket Number: No. 12142
Parties: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. CANNON MFG. CORPORATION et al.
Judges: Before GOODRICH and POPE, Circuit Judges and HALL, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 177
Pages: 197–197

Head Matter:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. CANNON MFG. CORPORATION et al.
No. 12142.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
Oct. 12, 1949.
David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, Owsley Vose, Frederick U. Reel and Mozart G. Ratner, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
David H. Cannon, Los Angeles, Cal. (Reed E. Callister, Los Angeles, Cal., of counsel), for respondent.
Before GOODRICH and POPE, Circuit Judges and HALL, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This case presents no new issue of law-under the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq. The sole question is whether the findings of fact by the Board are supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole. We have no doubt that they are. The Board's order is not improper under the circumstances and there is no reason to modify or set it aside in whole or in part.
The respondents complain of delay in seeking enforcement. While delay in deciding labor disputes is not to be encouraged, the respondents cannot complain as they could have sought immediate review under Section 10(f) of the Act.
The enforcement order will be granted.