Case Name: In re Michael Anthony DOMINGOS, Relator
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 2003-10-08
Citations: 129 S.W.3d 584
Docket Number: No. 05-03-01458-CV
Parties: In re Michael Anthony DOMINGOS, Relator.
Judges: Before Justices WRIGHT, MOSELEY, and RICHTER.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 129
Pages: 584–584

Head Matter:
In re Michael Anthony DOMINGOS, Relator.
No. 05-03-01458-CV.
Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.
Oct. 8, 2003.
Brad M. Lamorgese, Cooper & Scully, P.C., Dallas, for relator.
Teresa G. Sanchez, Parker & Montgomery, George Parker, George Parker & Associates, McKinney, Jeffrey Kyle Short, Plano, for real party in interest.
Before Justices WRIGHT, MOSELEY, and RICHTER.

Opinion:
OPINION AND ORDER
Opinion by Justice MOSELEY.
Relator contends the trial judge erred in entering visitation orders. Based on the record presented, we conclude relator has failed to show himself entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, relator's motion for immediate temporary relief and petition for writ of mandamus are DENIED. See Tex.R.App. P. 52.8(a).
The Court hereby notifies relator and relator's counsel that on its own initiative the Court is considering imposing sanctions against relator and relator's counsel for filing a petition that is clearly groundless, brought solely for delay, or grossly misstates or omits obvious or important material facts, or for filing a record that is clearly misleading. Tex.R.App. P. 52.11. The relator and relator's counsel are ORDERED to file a response no later than October 17, 2003 addressing why sanctions should not be imposed.