Case Name: Carl KLUNK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U.S. COST, INCORPORATED; Parsons Management Consultants, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-04-11
Citations: 223 F. App'x 254
Docket Number: No. 06-1926
Parties: Carl KLUNK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U.S. COST, INCORPORATED; Parsons Management Consultants, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 223
Pages: 254–254

Head Matter:
Carl KLUNK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U.S. COST, INCORPORATED; Parsons Management Consultants, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 06-1926.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 28, 2007.
Decided: April 11, 2007.
Dean E. Wanderer, Dean E. Wanderer & Associates, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellant. Gregory J. Digel, Holland & Knight, LLP, Atlanta, Georgia; Kathleen M. Williams, Epstein, Becker & Green, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Carl Klunk appeals the district court's order dismissing this action with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(d). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated from the bench by the district court. Klunk v. U.S. Cost, Inc., No. 1:05-cv-01262-TSE (E.D.Va. July 21, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.