Case Name: Henry PATRICK, Petitioner, v. FAIRCLOTH BUICK COMPANY, Sally Smith and Virginia Massaro, as Administratrix of the Estate of Joseph Massaro, Deceased, Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1967-05-17
Citations: 198 So. 2d 825
Docket Number: No. 35477
Parties: Henry PATRICK, Petitioner, v. FAIRCLOTH BUICK COMPANY, Sally Smith and Virginia Massaro, as Administratrix of the Estate of Joseph Massaro, Deceased, Respondents.
Judges: THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 198
Pages: 825–825

Head Matter:
Henry PATRICK, Petitioner, v. FAIRCLOTH BUICK COMPANY, Sally Smith and Virginia Massaro, as Administratrix of the Estate of Joseph Massaro, Deceased, Respondents.
No. 35477.
Supreme Court of Florida.
May 17, 1967.
McClain, Thompson, Turbiville, White & Davis, J. A. McClain, Jr., E. B. Rood, Tittsworth & Tittsworth, Tampa, for petitioner.
Fowler, White, Collins, Gillen, Humkey & Trenam and James E. Thompson, Tampa, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition for writ of certiorari we have been asked to review the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Second District, in the case of Patrick v. Faircloth Buick Company, 185 So.2d 522.
The petition reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court and we issued the writ and have heard oral argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the decisions relied upon by the Petitioner present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. The writ is discharged.
It is so ordered.
THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
THORNAL, C. J., DREW, J., and Mc-MULLEN, Circuit Judge, dissent.