Case Name: THE MAYOR AND ALDERMEN OF JERSEY CITY ET AL., DEFENDANTS IN ERROR, v. WILLIAM H. SPEER, CIRCUIT JUDGE, AND LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1910-06-20
Citations: 79 N.J.L. 598
Docket Number: 
Parties: THE MAYOR AND ALDERMEN OF JERSEY CITY ET AL., DEFENDANTS IN ERROR, v. WILLIAM H. SPEER, CIRCUIT JUDGE, AND LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 79
Pages: 598–598

Head Matter:
THE MAYOR AND ALDERMEN OF JERSEY CITY ET AL., DEFENDANTS IN ERROR, v. WILLIAM H. SPEER, CIRCUIT JUDGE, AND LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR.
Argued March 10, 1910 —
Decided June 20, 1910.
On error to Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 49 Vroom 34.
For the Lehigh Valley Railroad Company of New Jersey, plaintiff in error, Charles L. Corbin and Gilbert Collins.
For the New Jersey Warehouse and Guaranty Company, plaintiff in error, James B. Vredenburgh and Albert C. Wall.
For the defendants in error, Warren Dixon.

Opinion:
Per Cueiam.
We agree with the Supreme Court in its construction of the supplement of 1891 to the so-called Martin act (Pamph. L. 1886, p. 149; Gen. Stat., p. 3370; Pamph. L. 1891, p. 393; Gen. Stat., p. 3384, pl. 451), as expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Garrison in that court. We find it unnecessary to pass upon the constitutional question discussed in that opinion.
The judgment under review should be affirmed, with costs.
For affirmance — Ti-ie Chancellor, Chiee Justice; Swayze, Trenchaed, Bergen, Minturn, Bogbrt, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Gray, Congdon, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.