Case Name: Ernest BLACKWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-03-31
Citations: 964 S.W.2d 249
Docket Number: No. 72420
Parties: Ernest BLACKWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before AHRENS, P.J., and CRANDALL and KAROHL, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 964
Pages: 249–250

Head Matter:
Ernest BLACKWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 72420.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
March 31, 1998.
Dave Hemingway, Asst; Sp. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jill C. LaHue, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before AHRENS, P.J., and CRANDALL and KAROHL, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant appeals from the judgment entered denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal and find the motion court's judgment is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).