Case Name: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Soucek
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1988-05-25
Citations: 37 Ohio St. 3d 42
Docket Number: No. D.D. 87-27
Parties: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Soucek.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas and H. Brown, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 37
Pages: 42–43

Head Matter:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Soucek.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Soucek (1988), 37 Ohio St. 3d 42.]
No. D.D. 87-27
Submitted February 16, 1988
Decided May 25, 1988.
J. Warren Bettis, disciplinary counsel, and Charles T. Brown, for relator.
Jonathan H. Soucek, pro se.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This court finds that respondent violated the Disciplinary Rules indicated by the board. However, we find the sanction recommended was not appropriate when compared to the misconduct committed. Accordingly, respondent is hereby ordered indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas and H. Brown, JJ., concur.
Wright, J., dissents.