Case Name: Joseph W. VERRETT, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL MOTORS AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-04-03
Citations: 683 F. App'x 225
Docket Number: No. 16-7214
Parties: Joseph W. VERRETT, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL MOTORS AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 683
Pages: 225–226

Head Matter:
Joseph W. VERRETT, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL MOTORS AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 16-7214
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 30, 2017
Decided: April 3, 2017
Joseph W. Verrett, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Joseph W. Verrett, Sr., seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing his civil complaint without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). Because Verrett may be able to remedy the deficiencies identified by the district court by filing an amended complaint stating sufficient facts to support his claims, the order Verrett seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Goode v. Central Va. Legal Aid Soc'y, 807 F.3d 619, 623-24 (4th Cir. 2015); Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and remand the case to the district court with instructions to allow Verrett to file an amended complaint. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED AND REMANDED