Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Lamarr CRAIG, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2017-06-27
Citations: 529 S.W.3d 326
Docket Number: No. ED 104217
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Lamarr CRAIG, Appellant.
Judges: Before James M. Dowd, P.J., Kurt S. Odenwald, J., and Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 529
Pages: 326–326

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Lamarr CRAIG, Appellant.
No. ED 104217
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
Filed: June 27, 2017
FOR APPELLANT: Andrew E. Zleit, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101.
FOR RESPONDENT: Josh Hawley, Christine Katherine Lesicko, 221 West High Street, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.
Before James M. Dowd, P.J., Kurt S. Odenwald, J., and Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Lemarr Craig appeals his convictions by a St. Louis City jury of first-degree assault, discharging a firearm from a vehicle, and two counts of armed criminal action arising out of the shooting of Richmond Johnson ("Victim"). Craig raises two points on appeal: 1) the trial court erred in denying his motion for. judgment of acquittal and motion for new trial because there was insufficient evidence to support his convictions due to Victim's testimony at trial that Craig was not the shooter; and 2) the trial court abused its discretion in precluding the defense from questioning Victim about any bias or expectation of leniency Victim had related to Victim's pending criminal case in St. Louis County. Finding no error, we affirm. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25.