Case Name: Shaefer, Appellant, v. Minor et al.
Court: High Court of Errors and Appeals of Mississippi
Jurisdiction: Mississippi
Decision Date: 1835-01
Citations: 1 Howard 218
Docket Number: 
Parties: Shaefer, Appellant, v. Minor et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Mississippi Reports
Volume: 2
Pages: 218–219

Head Matter:
Shaefer, Appellant, v. Minor et al.
In an action upon a bond, tbe condition of the bond set forth was, “ that the defendant shall pay the condemnation moneys or render his tody in execution,” and the plaintiff assigned for breach, that the defendant did not perforin the condemnation of the court, by the payment of the amount of the judgment: Held, that the assignment of breach was not good, it should have been like the condition in the alternative.
ACTION of debt in the circuit court of Claiborne county, by Abraham K. 'Shaefer, assignee of the coroner of said county, against William B. Minor et al, on a bail bond. The condition of the bond declared on, is in these words: “in case the said Minor shall be cast in the said suit, if. the said Minor shall pay and satisfy the condemnation of the court, or render his body in execution of the same, or on failure thereof, that the said, &c., shall do it for him, then this obligation to be void,” &c. The breach of the bond assigned, by which it is said to have become forfeited, is, “ that the said Minor hath not complied with the tenor of his said bond, in this that he hath not abided by, or performed the order and judgment of the circuit court, by paying and satisfying the said judgment, &c., whereby, &c.”
The defendant below demurred, and for cause of demurrer, assigned:
That the declaration is defective, in not averring a breach in the alternative like the condition of the bond. The court sustained the demurrér and judgment for the defendant. An appeal was prosecuted.
Martin, for appellant.
Iresh, contra.

Opinion:
Mr. Chief Justice Shakke.y
delivered the opinion of the court.
This action was instituted on a bond given to replevy property taken by attachment; the bond is substantially a special bail bond, and is said not to conform to the statute.
The tenth section of the attachment law, provides, that property attached may be replevied, by giving bond and surety to .the sheriff or officer levying the attachment, and the condition of the bond is, that the party shall appear at the next term of the circuit court, and abide by and perform the judgment of the court. This is substantially the condition of a bail'bond, and it is entirely probable that the section referred to, contemplates nothing more than a bail bond as the property attached is thereby relieved, and it becomes a.proceeding against the person.
It is not necessary to examine as to the validity of the bond. If it be good, thfe declaration on it is bad, and afforded a good ground for the court below to sustain the demurrer. The condition of the bond as set out is, that the defendant shall pay the condemnation of the court, or render his body in execution. The condition is in the alternative, either that he should perform the one or the other of the terms, and the performance of either would, of course, be a compliance with the condition, and discharge the obligation and release the sureties. The plaintiff has assigned for a breach, that Minor did not perform the condemnation of the court by the payment of the amount of the judgment, but has not averred the non-performance of the alternative. It may be, for any thing that appears in the declaration, that Minor did render his body in execution, in strict pursuance of his undertaking; and if so, the condition was performed. The plaintiff should also have assigned as a breach that Minor had not rendered his body in execution.
•The judgment of the court below must be affirmed.