Case Name: Charles H. Babcock and George C. Foster, d/b/a/ New York Drafting Institute, Appellants, Respondents, v. Thomas Russo, Respondent, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1940-03-28
Citations: 173 Misc. 771
Docket Number: 
Parties: Charles H. Babcock and George C. Foster, d/b/a/ New York Drafting Institute, Appellants, Respondents, v. Thomas Russo, Respondent, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 173
Pages: 771–772

Head Matter:
Charles H. Babcock and George C. Foster, d/b/a/ New York Drafting Institute, Appellants, Respondents, v. Thomas Russo, Respondent, Appellant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
March 28, 1940.
Reuben 8. Levins, for the appellants, respondents.
David M. Berger, for the respondent, appellant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The failure to receive the license required by section 66-a of the Education Law prior to the making of the contract did not in the circumstances render the contract unenforeible.
Order denying plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment reversed, with ten dollars costs to plaintiffs, and motion granted.
Order denying defendant's motion for summary judgment affirmed.
All concur. Present — McCook, Hammeb and Milleb, JJ.