Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Robert M. FAST, Defendant-Appellee. Vicky, Child Pornography Victim, Interested party-Appellant. In re Vicky, Child Pornography Victim, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-08-28
Citations: 765 F.3d 877
Docket Number: Nos. 12-2752, 12-2769
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Robert M. FAST, Defendant-Appellee. Vicky, Child Pornography Victim, Interested party-Appellant. In re Vicky, Child Pornography Victim, Petitioner.
Judges: Before MURPHY, BENTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 765
Pages: 877–877

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Robert M. FAST, Defendant-Appellee. Vicky, Child Pornography Victim, Interested party-Appellant. In re Vicky, Child Pornography Victim, Petitioner.
Nos. 12-2752, 12-2769.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 20, 2014.
Filed: Aug. 28, 2014.
Rehearing Denied Oct. 17, 2014.
Steven A. Russell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, argued, Lincoln, NE, Nancy A. Svoboda, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, argued, Omaha, NE, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Robert M. Fast, argued, Petersburg, VA, pro se.
Jennifer L. Gilg, Federal Public Defender’s Office, argued, Omaha, NE, Michael Hansen, Assistant, Federal Public Defender’s Office, argued, Lincoln, NE, for Defendant-Appellee.
Paul Cassell, argued, Salt Lake City, UT, Carol Lynn Hepburn, argued, Seattle, WA, James R. Marsh, Marsh Law Firm, argued, White Plains, N.Y., for Interested party-Appellant/Petitioner.
Before MURPHY, BENTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This case is on remand from the Supreme Court of the United States. Vicky, Child Pornography Victim v. Fast, — U.S.—, 134 S.Ct. 1934, 188 L.Ed.2d 955 (2014). Robert M. Fast pled guilty to receiving and distributing child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(2). Vicky challenged the district court's restitution order. This court dismissed her appeal, finding that the defendant must "proximately cause the victim's losses." In re Vicky, Child Pornography Victim, 709 F.3d 712, 721 (8th Cir.2013). The Supreme Court vacated this court's judgment and remanded for further consideration in light of Paroline v. United States, — U.S.—, 134 S.Ct. 1710, 188 L.Ed.2d 714 (2014). In Paroline, the Court found that 18 U.S.C. § 2259 requires "restitution in an amount that comports with the defendant's relative role in the causal process that underlies the victim's general losses." Paroline, 134 S.Ct. at 1727.
*
The case is remanded to the district court for further consideration in light of Paroline.