Case Name: Keith B. SHAMBERGER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; America's Servicing Company, d/b/a Asc; Shapiro Brown & Alt, LLP, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-04-21
Citations: 567 F. App'x 183
Docket Number: No. 13-2514
Parties: Keith B. SHAMBERGER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; America’s Servicing Company, d/b/a Asc; Shapiro Brown & Alt, LLP, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 567
Pages: 183–183

Head Matter:
Keith B. SHAMBERGER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; America’s Servicing Company, d/b/a Asc; Shapiro Brown & Alt, LLP, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 13-2514.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 17, 2014.
Decided: April 21, 2014.
Keith B. Shamberger, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Keith B. Shamberger appeals the district court's order dismissing his pro se complaint against Defendants after a review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. Shamberger v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 3:13-cv-00645-JAG, 2013 WL 6019248 (E.D.Va. Nov. 13, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.