Case Name: Rigoberto M. CALVO, Appellant, v. FLORIDA COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY, et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-03-06
Citations: 672 So. 2d 847
Docket Number: No. 96-68
Parties: Rigoberto M. CALVO, Appellant, v. FLORIDA COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY, et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before NESBITT, LEVY and GREEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 672
Pages: 847–848

Head Matter:
Rigoberto M. CALVO, Appellant, v. FLORIDA COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY, et al., Appellees.
No. 96-68.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 6, 1996.
De La 0, Marko & Wang and David E. Marko, Miami; McFarlain, Wile, Cassedy & Jones and Robert A. McNeely, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Miller & Martin and Ronald G. Ingham and Thomas A. Swafford, Chattanooga, TN, for appellees.
Before NESBITT, LEVY and GREEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the order of the Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission disqualifying the claimant from receiving benefits. Rigoberto Calvo exercised poor judgment in failing to correctly fill out the Merchandising Report to reflect the actual times and order in which he serviced various establishments. This isolated occurrence of such poor judgment, however, does not rise to the level of misconduct required under section 443.036(26)(a) of the Florida Statutes. See Betancourt v. Sun Bank Miami, 672 So.2d 37, (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) and cases cited therein.
Reversed.