Case Name: Manuel Antonio GONZALEZ, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. T. MASON; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-12-04
Citations: 357 F. App'x 835
Docket Number: No. 08-16440
Parties: Manuel Antonio GONZALEZ, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. T. MASON; et al., DefendantsAppellees.
Judges: Before: SKOPIL, LEAVY, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 357
Pages: 835–836

Head Matter:
Manuel Antonio GONZALEZ, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. T. MASON; et al., DefendantsAppellees.
No. 08-16440.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 20, 2009.
Filed Dec. 4, 2009.
Manuel Antonio Gonzalez, III, Soledad, CA, pro se.
Lisa Sciandra, Office of the Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: SKOPIL, LEAVY, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Manuel Antonio Gonzalez III, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We affirm.
DISCUSSION
The Prison Litigation Reform Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), requires that a prisoner exhaust available administrative remedies before bringing a federal action concerning prison conditions. Griffin v. Arpaio, 557 F.3d 1117, 1119 (9th Cir.2009). The exhaustion must be "proper," meaning that all steps the prison requires must be satisfied. Id.
We agree with the district court that Gonzalez failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. Moreover, the district court did not clearly err in finding that Gonzalez was not prevented from filing prison grievances. See Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1119-20 (9th Cir.2003) ("In deciding a motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust nonjudicial remedies, the court may . decide disputed issues of fact."). Finally, there is no merit to Gonzalez's contention that he exhausted his claims because prison officials otherwise had "notice" of his complaints. See Marella v. Terhune, 568 F.3d 1024, 1027 (9th Cir.2009) (noting prisoners must "complete the administrative review process in accordance with the applicable procedural rules") (quoting Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 88, 126 S.Ct. 2378, 165 L.Ed.2d 368 (2006)).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
. Gonzales submitted documents on appeal that were not part of the record below. Ap-pellees' motion to strike those documents from the record on appeal is granted.