Case Name: In the Matter of the Claim for Compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Law of William T. Priestley, Appellant, against H. Hentz & Co. and Another, Respondents. State Industrial Board, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1931-11
Citations: 234 A.D. 804
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Claim for Compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Law of William T. Priestley, Appellant, against H. Hentz & Co. and Another, Respondents. State Industrial Board, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 234
Pages: 804–805

Head Matter:
Third Department,
November, 1931.
In the Matter of the Claim for Compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Law of William T. Priestley, Appellant, against H. Hentz & Co. and Another, Respondents. State Industrial Board, Respondent.
Affd., 258 N. Y. 618.

Opinion:
Appeal from a decision of the State Industrial Board noticed on November 15, 1930.
Decision affirmed, on the authority of Harby v. Marwell Bros., Inc. (203 App. Div. 525; affd., 235 N. Y. 504); Matter of Jakeway v. Bauer Co. (218 App. Div. 302); Davidson v. Pansy Waist Co. (240 N. Y. 584). All concur, except Hill, J., who dissents, with an opinion.