Case Name: THE STATE, JAMES DUFFY, PROSECUTOR, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. EUGENE BRITTON, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1886-03
Citations: 48 N.J.L. 371
Docket Number: 
Parties: THE STATE, JAMES DUFFY, PROSECUTOR, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. EUGENE BRITTON, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 48
Pages: 371–371

Head Matter:
THE STATE, JAMES DUFFY, PROSECUTOR, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. EUGENE BRITTON, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
Error to the Supreme Court. For opinion of the Supreme Court see 18 Vroom 251.
For the plaintiff in error, H. M. Nevius.
For the defendant in error, W. A. Heisley.

Opinion:
The Chancellor.
The judgment of the Supreme Court in this case should be affirmed, for the reasons given by that court.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Dixon, Knapp, Mague, Parker, Reed, Van Syckel, Brown, Clement, Cole, McG-regíor, Paterson, Whitaker. 14.
For reversal—Hone.