Case Name: Jimmy L. KING v. STATE of Arkansas
Court: Arkansas Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Arkansas
Decision Date: 1995-09-25
Citations: 321 Ark. 617
Docket Number: CR 95-884
Parties: Jimmy L. KING v. STATE of Arkansas
Judges: 
Reporter: Arkansas Reports
Volume: 321
Pages: 617–617

Head Matter:
Jimmy L. KING v. STATE of Arkansas
CR 95-884
906 S.W.2d 306
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Opinion delivered September 25, 1995
Thomas A. Potter, for appellant.
No response.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Jimmy L. King moves for a rule on the clerk to file the record in his appeal. In the circumstances presented, we treat the motion as one for a belated appeal. The record has been refused because the notice of appeal was not filed in a timely manner. It was more than 30 days after a new trial motion was deemed denied pursuant to Ark. R. App. P. 4(c).
Mr. King's counsel Thomas A. Potter acknowledges that the notice of appeal was untimely and by affidavit he assumes full responsibility for the error. The failure of counsel to perfect an appeal in a criminal case constitutes a denial of effective assistance of counsel and is good cause for granting a belated appeal. Gay v. State, 288 Ark. 589, 707 S.W.2d 320 (1986). A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.