Case Name: Little Bill or Maquiqui, Appellant, v. Jessie A. Dyslin et al., Respondents
Court: Washington Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Washington
Decision Date: 1911-08-25
Citations: 64 Wash. 697
Docket Number: No. 9315
Parties: Little Bill or Maquiqui, Appellant, v. Jessie A. Dyslin et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Washington Reports
Volume: 64
Pages: 697–697

Head Matter:
[No. 9315.
Department Two.
August 25, 1911.]
Little Bill or Maquiqui, Appellant, v. Jessie A. Dyslin et al., Respondents.
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Clifford, J., entered May 21, 1910, upon findings in favor of the defendants, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action of ejectment
Affirmed.
-27. D. Wilcox and Wesley Lloyd, for appellant.
Boyle, WarJyurton & Brockway and J. J. Anderson, for respondents.
Reported in 117 Pac. 487.

Opinion:
Pee Cubiam.
This action was commenced by Little Bill or Maquiqui, against Jessie A. Dyslin and others, to recover possession of' certain Puyallup Indian land in Pierce county. Prom a judgment in favor of the defendants, the plaintiff has appealed.
The issues here raised involve the same questions presented on appeal in the cause of Little Bill v. Swanson, ante p. 650, 117 Pac. 481. Upon the authority of the opinion in that cause, filed on this date, the judgment herein is affirmed.