Case Name: ESTATE OF Royal B. NEWMAN, and Rebecca E/ Newman, Personal Representative of the Estate of Royal B. Newman, and Trustee of the Royal B. Newman Trust, Appellants, v. Joann S. NEWMAN, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2003-11-26
Citations: 859 So. 2d 1291
Docket Number: No. 3D03-672
Parties: ESTATE OF Royal B. NEWMAN, and Rebecca E/ Newman, Personal Representative of the Estate of Royal B. Newman, and Trustee of the Royal B. Newman Trust, Appellants, v. Joann S. NEWMAN, Appellee.
Judges: Before COPE, SHEVIN and RAMIREZ, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 859
Pages: 1291–1292

Head Matter:
ESTATE OF Royal B. NEWMAN, and Rebecca E/ Newman, Personal Representative of the Estate of Royal B. Newman, and Trustee of the Royal B. Newman Trust, Appellants, v. Joann S. NEWMAN, Appellee.
No. 3D03-672.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 26, 2003.
Greene, Smith & Associates, P.A.,; Paula Revene, Miami; Bonnie J. Helms, Key West, for appellants.
Gerald V. Walsh, Coral Springs, for ap-pellee.
Before COPE, SHEVIN and RAMIREZ, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The Estate of Royal B. Newman appeals a final judgment determining that the property settlement agreement between the decedent former husband, and the ap- pellee former wife, retained its character as property settlement agreement subsequent to the parties' execution of an addendum to that agreement in 1992. We conclude that the trial court's findings, entered after an evidentiary hearing, are supported by the record and correctly characterize the agreement. See Salomon v. Salomon, 196 So.2d 111 (Fla.1967); Karch v. Karch, 445 So.2d 1077 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).
Affirmed.