Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Oliver SNEED, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-08-02
Citations: 474 F. App'x 902
Docket Number: No. 12-6857
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Oliver SNEED, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 474
Pages: 902–903

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Oliver SNEED, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-6857.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 26, 2012.
Decided: Aug. 2, 2012.
Oliver Sneed, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Gurney Wingate Grant, II, Norval George Metcalf, Assistant United States Attorneys, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Oliver Sneed, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying his motion to compel the Government to file a Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Sneed, No. 3:08-cr-00296-REP-2 (E.D.Va. Apr. 20, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.