Case Name: William PEARSON Appellant, v. ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES, LTD., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-01-12
Citations: 751 So. 2d 125
Docket Number: No. 3D98-2773
Parties: William PEARSON Appellant, v. ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES, LTD., Appellee.
Judges: Before JORGENSON, COPE, and FLETCHER, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 751
Pages: 125–126

Head Matter:
William PEARSON Appellant, v. ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES, LTD., Appellee.
No. 3D98-2773.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan. 12, 2000.
Stuart H. Share, Miami, and Mark T. Packo, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
Hicks & Anderson and Mark Hicks and Dinah S. Stein, Miami; Canning & Murray, Miami, for appellee.
Before JORGENSON, COPE, and FLETCHER, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Clement v. Rousselle Corp., 372 So.2d 1156, 1158 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)("A defendant who has answered with a general denial, is entitled to prove, and to argue to the jury, that the accident was due solely to the negligence of a person not party to the suit."), cert. denied, 383 So.2d 1191 (Fla.1980).