Case Name: A. E. EATON, Respondent, v. THE OREGON RAILWAY & NAVIGATION COMPANY, Appellant
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1890-06-21
Citations: 19 Or. 397
Docket Number: 
Parties: A. E. EATON, Respondent, v. THE OREGON RAILWAY & NAVIGATION COMPANY, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 19
Pages: 397–397

Head Matter:
[Filed June 21, 1890.]
A. E. EATON, Respondent, v. THE OREGON RAILWAY & NAVIGATION COMPANY, Appellant.
Appeal from Union county: Jas. A. Fee, judge.
W. W. Cotton and Gilbert & Snow, for Appellant.
E. Ealaitn and T. H. Crawford, for Respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The points raised and decided in the preceding cases—Eaton v. O. R'y & N. Co., ante, p. 391—render it unnecessary to consider the main questions suggested by this record. In the views there expressed the instructions were not prejudicial, and the judgment must be affirmed.