Case Name: George Allen JOHNSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1976-02-10
Citations: 328 So. 2d 33
Docket Number: No. 75-16
Parties: George Allen JOHNSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before PEARSON, HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 328
Pages: 33–33

Head Matter:
George Allen JOHNSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 75-16.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 10, 1976.
Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and Paul Morris, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Margarita G. Esquiroz, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, and Roy Kahn, Legal Intern, for ap-pellee.
Before PEARSON, HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The defendant appeals an order denying his motion for relief pursuant to CrPR 3.-850. The single point presented on appeal urges that the trial court erred because the record did not conclusively refute defendant's allegation of ineffectiveness of counsel at sentencing. This point was not included in petitioner's written motion for relief but it appears that it was the only point which was presented or argued to the trial judge. The motion was denied.
It is our view that the record, which shows that the defendant 1) pleaded guilty to eleven felonies including charges of grand larceny, larceny of an automobile, burglary and several counts of robbery and 2) received a sentence of only ten years in the state prison, conclusively refutes the charge that defendant was not adequately represented at the time of sentencing. See Caplinger v. State, Fla.App.1973, 271 So.2d 780.
Affirmed.