Case Name: CHARLES W. BATTLE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THE GENERAL CELLULOSE COMPANY, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1958-04-28
Citations: 26 N.J. 488
Docket Number: 
Parties: CHARLES W. BATTLE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THE GENERAL CELLULOSE COMPANY, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 26
Pages: 488–488

Head Matter:
CHARLES W. BATTLE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THE GENERAL CELLULOSE COMPANY, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Argued March 31, 1958
Decided April 28, 1958.
See also 23 N. J. 538.
Mr. Robert Schur (of the Uew York Bar) argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Messrs. Leavitt, Tall&y & Krevshy, attorneys; Mr. Fayette N. • Talley, of counsel).
Mr. Harry A. Margolis argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Mr. Max L. Rosenstein, attorney).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Examination of the record presented to us does not disclose any basis for a determination that the trial court mistakenly exercised his discretion in granting the qualified order for the taking of the deposition of the plaintiff.
The order is affirmed.
For affirmance—Chief Justice Weintbaub, and Justices Heher, Wacheneeld, Burling, Jacobs, Ebancis and Proctor—7.
For reversal—Done.