Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. KEVIN RAY SONS, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2002-06-12
Citations: 182 Or. App. 257
Docket Number: PR090049; A110194
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. KEVIN RAY SONS, Appellant.
Judges: Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Linder and Wollheim, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 182
Pages: 257–258

Head Matter:
Submitted on record and briefs May 3,
reversed June 12, 2002
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. KEVIN RAY SONS, Appellant.
PR090049; A110194
47 P3d 931
Craig P. Colby and Wall & Colby filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General, and Rolf C. Moan, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Linder and Wollheim, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant was found guilty of exceeding the maximum speed limit, ORS 811.123, and fined $100. On appeal, he asserts that the trial court erred in concluding that he violated ORS 811.123 because no evidence was presented at trial that defendant was the registered owner of the car that was photographed exceeding the speed limit. The state concedes that reversal is required, because this case is factually indistinguishable from State v. Clay, 332 Or 327, 29 P3d 1101 (2001). We agree and accept the state's concession.
Reversed.