Case Name: Susan M. NEWTON, Appellant, v. LIONEL PLAYWORLD and Crawford & Company, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-03-07
Citations: 557 So. 2d 247
Docket Number: No. 89-1686
Parties: Susan M. NEWTON, Appellant, v. LIONEL PLAYWORLD and Crawford & Company, Appellees.
Judges: ERVIN, WENTWORTH and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 557
Pages: 247–247

Head Matter:
Susan M. NEWTON, Appellant, v. LIONEL PLAYWORLD and Crawford & Company, Appellees.
No. 89-1686.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
March 7, 1990.
John T. Fryback, Bradenton, for appellant.
John J. O’Riordan, Sarasota, for appel-lees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant filed a notice of appeal from a final order of the judge of compensation claims (JCC). Appellant then informed this court, by way of a motion to remand, that the tapes of the final hearing could not be transcribed. Jurisdiction was relinquished for 30 days to allow the parties to prepare a statement of the evidence, pursuant to Rule 9.200(b)(4), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Appellant now files a motion for remand for trial de novo showing that the parties are unable to reconstruct the record. Ap-pellee has no objection to the motion. The JCC has certified that a statement of the evidence cannot be prepared. Accordingly, the final order of the JCC is vacated and the cause is remanded for a hearing de novo. Arnold Lumber Co. v. Harris, 469 So.2d 786 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).
ERVIN, WENTWORTH and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.