Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Vladimir KOTLYARENKO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-07-28
Citations: 195 F. App'x 563
Docket Number: No. 05-10403
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Vladimir KOTLYARENKO, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: ALARCÓN, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 195
Pages: 563–563

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Vladimir KOTLYARENKO, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 05-10403.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 24, 2006.
Filed July 28, 2006.
Karen D. Beausey, AUSA, Audra S. Ibarra, Esq., USSF — Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Francisco, CA, for PlaintiffAppellee.
Ted W. Cassman, Esq., Arguedas, Cassman & Headley, LLP, Berkeley, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: ALARCÓN, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Vladimir Kotlyarenko appeals from the district court's order denying the motion to withdraw his guilty plea. We dismiss the appeal.
A review of the record indicates that Kotlyarenko knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal the conviction, the judgment, and orders of the court and was sentenced within the terms of the plea agreement. We therefore enforce the waiver and dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2000) (stating that an appeal waiver is valid when it is entered knowingly and voluntarily).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.