Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Leslie Keith BLOXOM, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-01-24
Citations: 709 F. App'x 312
Docket Number: No. 17-30365 Summary Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Leslie Keith BLOXOM, Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 709
Pages: 312–313

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Leslie Keith BLOXOM, Defendant-Appellant
No. 17-30365 Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed January 24, 2018
Camille Ann Domingue, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA, Cristina Walker, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Louisiana, Shreveport, LA, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee
Leslie Keith Bloxom, Pro Se
Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Leslie Keith Bloxona has moved for leave to -withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Bloxom has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for. appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
The record, however, shows that the amended judgment incorrectly states that Bloxom was sentenced under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), and that the district court did not enter an amended written statement of reasons. We therefore REMAND to the district court for correction of these clerical errors. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 36.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.