Case Name: Daryl N. Clark, Respondent, v. City of Rome et al., Defendants, and Dominick Corigliano, Individually and as an Officer, Agent and Employee of City of Rome, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2001-12-21
Citations: 289 A.D.2d 965
Docket Number: 
Parties: Daryl N. Clark, Respondent, v City of Rome et al., Defendants, and Dominick Corigliano, Individually and as an Officer, Agent and Employee of City of Rome, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 289
Pages: 965–965

Head Matter:
Daryl N. Clark, Respondent, v City of Rome et al., Defendants, and Dominick Corigliano, Individually and as an Officer, Agent and Employee of City of Rome, Appellant.
[738 NYS2d 261]

Opinion:
Order unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated at Supreme Court, Parker, J. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Parker, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Green, Pine, Hayes and Hurlbutt, JJ.