Case Name: Don A. DAILEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-07-06
Citations: 137 S.W.3d 548
Docket Number: No. WD 62709
Parties: Don A. DAILEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before RONALD R. HOLLIGER, P.J., ROBERT G. ULRICH, and JAMES M. SMART, JR., JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 137
Pages: 548–549

Head Matter:
Don A. DAILEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 62709.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
July 6, 2004.
Irene Earns, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.
Deborah Daniels, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before RONALD R. HOLLIGER, P.J., ROBERT G. ULRICH, and JAMES M. SMART, JR., JJ.

Opinion:
Order
PER CURIAM.
Don Dailey appeals the denial of his pro se Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing based on the assertion that the motion court erred in not conducting a hearing to determine whether he had been abandoned by post-conviction counsel. We affirm by summary order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).