Case Name: John R. Linton et al., Respondents, v. Muhammad Nawaz et al., Appellants
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2010-04-06
Citations: 14 N.Y.3d 821
Docket Number: 
Parties: John R. Linton et al., Respondents, v Muhammad Nawaz et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 14
Pages: 821–822

Head Matter:
[926 NE2d 593, 900 NYS2d 239]
John R. Linton et al., Respondents, v Muhammad Nawaz et al., Appellants.
Decided April 6, 2010
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Baker, McEvoy, Morrissey & Moskovits, P.C., New York City (Stacy R. Seldin of counsel), for appellants.
Law Offices of Mark S. Gray, New York City (Peter J. Eliopoulos of counsel), for respondents.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative.
In this personal injury case in which a taxi struck the plaintiff, the evidence plaintiff proffered relating to injuries to his right shoulder and lumbosacral spine raised a triable question of fact as to whether he suffered a serious injury that was causally related to the accident under the permanent consequential limitation of use of a body organ or member and/or significant limitation of a body function or system criteria (see Insurance Law § 5102 [d]). Since plaintiff established that at least some of his injuries meet the "no-fault" threshold, it is unnecessary to address whether his proof with respect to other injuries he allegedly sustained would have been sufficient to withstand defendants' motion for summary judgment.
Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur in memorandum.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, etc.