Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Nadine Carr, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1994-09-26
Citations: 207 A.D.2d 901
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Nadine Carr, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 207
Pages: 901–902

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Nadine Carr, Appellant.
[616 NYS2d 995]

Opinion:
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Patterson, J.), rendered February 21, 1992, convicting her of assault in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, reckless endangerment in the first degree, endangering the welfare of a child, and assault in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review her contention that the evidence adduced at trial was legally insufficient to establish that she possessed the mental culpability necessary to commit the crimes charged, and that, in furtherance thereof, she solicited, requested, commanded, importuned, or intentionally aided the principal (see, People v Logan, 74 NY2d 859; People v Bynum, 70 NY2d 858; People v Clarke, 195 AD2d 569). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).
The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Balletta, J. P., O'Brien, Copertino and Florio, JJ., concur.