Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wenley McCLAREN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-04-23
Citations: 224 F. App'x 258
Docket Number: No. 06-7915
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wenley McCLAREN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 224
Pages: 258–258

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wenley McCLAREN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-7915.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 19, 2007.
Decided: April 23, 2007.
Wenley McClaren, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Wenley McClaren appeals the district court's order denying his motion for correction of an illegal sentence pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant McClaren's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. McClaren, No. 3:90-cr-00007-WCB (N.D.W.Va. Oct. 30, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.