Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Tyrone La-Shun MARSHALL, Appellant; STATE of Missouri, Appellant, v. Tyrone L. MARSHALL, Defendant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1996-12-03
Citations: 934 S.W.2d 338
Docket Number: Nos. WD 52239, CR0195-045719F
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Tyrone La-Shun MARSHALL, Appellant. STATE of Missouri, Appellant, v. Tyrone L. MARSHALL, Defendant.
Judges: Before ELLIS, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and LAURA DENVIR STITH, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 934
Pages: 338–338

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Tyrone La-Shun MARSHALL, Appellant. STATE of Missouri, Appellant, v. Tyrone L. MARSHALL, Defendant.
Nos. WD 52239, CR0195-045719F.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Dec. 3, 1996.
As Modified Dec. 24, 1996.
Rosalyn Koch, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Joanne E. Joiner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for Respondent.
Before ELLIS, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and LAURA DENVIR STITH, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Convicted by a jury of possession of a controlled substance, and sentenced as a pri- or offender, the defendant sought to suppress his incriminating statements to police after having sought counsel. Trial court was correct in overruling suppression since defendant voluntarily instigated further discussion with police. Affirmed Rule 30.25(b).