Case Name: Kenneth PEMBLETON, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-10-31
Citations: 30 S.W.3d 250
Docket Number: No. ED 77263
Parties: Kenneth PEMBLETON, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., PAUL J. SIMON and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 30
Pages: 250–250

Head Matter:
Kenneth PEMBLETON, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 77263.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Oct. 31, 2000.
Daniel H. Mohs, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Shaun J. Mackelprang, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., PAUL J. SIMON and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Kenneth Pembleton, appeals from a judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing.
The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(2).