Case Name: WILLIAM J. FLANAGAN, Appellant, v. FRANK C. SYKES et al., Respondents
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1924-10-22
Citations: 69 Cal. App. 793
Docket Number: Civ. No. 4982
Parties: WILLIAM J. FLANAGAN, Appellant, v. FRANK C. SYKES et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports
Volume: 69
Pages: 793–793

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 4982.
First Appellate District, Division One.
October 22, 1924.]
WILLIAM J. FLANAGAN, Appellant, v. FRANK C. SYKES et al., Respondents.
Sloss, Ackerman & Bradley for Appellant.
George Lull, City Attorney, and Maurice T. Booling, Jr.,j Assistant City Attorney, for Respondents.

Opinion:
St. SURE, J.
The question involved in this case is in1 all respects similar to that in Hurley v. Sykes et al., ante, p. 310 [231 Pac. 748], Upon the authority of that case it is ordered that the judgment be reversed and that a decree be entered in favor of appellant, with the direction that the writ issue.
Tyler, P. J., and Knight, J., concurred.