Case Name: Corey LOVE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-11-09
Citations: 9 S.W.3d 677
Docket Number: No. ED 75781
Parties: Corey LOVE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J., PAUL J. SIMON, J., and JAMES R. DOWD, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 9
Pages: 677–677

Head Matter:
Corey LOVE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 75781.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Nov. 9, 1999.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 5, 2000.
Application for Transfer Denied Feb. 22, 2000.
Annette Llewellyn, Asst. Sp. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Wade Thomas, Assistant Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J., PAUL J. SIMON, J., and JAMES R. DOWD, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Corey Love, ("movant"), appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County overruling his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant was convicted, after a jury trial, of trafficking in the second degree, section 195.223, RSMo 1994. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcripts, and find the judgment is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.