Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fredy Yovani HERNANDEZ-MALDONADO, a.k.a. Fredy Guanny Hernandez, a.k.a. Fredy Y. Hernandez, a.k.a. Fredy Yovani Hernandez, a.k.a. Fredy Yovani Hernandez-Maldonado, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-04-18
Citations: 687 F. App'x 581
Docket Number: No. 16-10158
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fredy Yovani HERNANDEZ-MALDONADO, a.k.a. Fredy Guanny Hernandez, a.k.a. Fredy Y. Hernandez, a.k.a. Fredy Yovani Hernandez, a.k.a. Fredy Yovani Hernandez-Maldonado, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 687
Pages: 581–582

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fredy Yovani HERNANDEZ-MALDONADO, a.k.a. Fredy Guanny Hernandez, a.k.a. Fredy Y. Hernandez, a.k.a. Fredy Yovani Hernandez, a.k.a. Fredy Yovani Hernandez-Maldonado, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-10158
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 11, 2017
Filed April 18, 2017
Erica MeCallum, Assistant U.S. Attorney, USTU-Office of the US Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Fredy Yovani Hernandez-Maldonado appeals from the district court's judgment and challenges the 25-month sentence imposed on remand following his guilty-plea conviction for reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Hernandez-Maldonado's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Hernandez-Maldonado the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provid ed by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.