Case Name: Robert HENNIG, Individually, etc., et al., Petitioners, v. Raymond W. HENNIG, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1966-04-20
Citations: 185 So. 2d 457
Docket Number: No. 34465
Parties: Robert HENNIG, Individually, etc., et al., Petitioners, v. Raymond W. HENNIG, Respondent.
Judges: THORNAL, C. J., O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., and WARREN, Circuit Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 185
Pages: 457–459

Head Matter:
Robert HENNIG, Individually, etc., et al., Petitioners, v. Raymond W. HENNIG, Respondent.
No. 34465.
Supreme Court of Florida.
April 20, 1966.
J. M. Flowers, Miami, for petitioners.
Snyder, Young & Stern and Howard J. Feinberg, North Miami Beach, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this court, and the writ was issued. Argument has been heard and upon further consideration and a careful review of the briefs, we are unable to find sufficient conflict with the decisions of this court or of the other district courts of appeal to vest jurisdiction in this court as required by the Constitution, Article V, Section 4, F.S.A.
The writ therefore must be and it is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
THORNAL, C. J., O'CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., and WARREN, Circuit Judge, concur.
ERVIN, J., dissents with opinion.