Case Name: James M. FRIERY, Plaintiff- Appellant, v. LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT; et al., Defendants- Appellees, and Office of Civil Rights; et al., Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-07-27
Citations: 329 F. App'x 173
Docket Number: No. 01-56016
Parties: James M. FRIERY, Plaintiff— Appellant, v. LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT; et al., Defendants— Appellees, and Office of Civil Rights; et al., Defendants.
Judges: Before: O’SCANNLAIN, RYMER and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 329
Pages: 173–173

Head Matter:
James M. FRIERY, Plaintiff— Appellant, v. LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT; et al., Defendants— Appellees, and Office of Civil Rights; et al., Defendants.
No. 01-56016.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted April 6, 2006.
Filed July 27, 2009.
Gary G. Kreep, United States Justice Foundation, Ramona, CA, Richard D. Ack-erman, Lively & Ackerman, Temecula, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Gregory L. Vinson, Peter W. James, Baker & Hostetler, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-appellees.
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, RYMER and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
On June 9, 2009, the appellant was ordered within 21 days to move for a voluntary dismissal or show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for mootness or lack of jurisdiction. Because the 21 days have expired without any response from the appellant, we DISMISS the appeal for failure to prosecute pursuant to 9th Cir. R. 42-1.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.