Case Name: Steven E. TARPLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank B. BISHOP, Jr., Warden; William S. Bohrer, Security Chief; Thomas L. Sawyers, Unit Manager; William L. Thomas, Sgt.; Sharon L. Lipsccob, Co II, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-01-31
Citations: 675 F. App'x 305
Docket Number: No. 16-7086
Parties: Steven E. TARPLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank B. BISHOP, Jr., Warden; William S. Bohrer, Security Chief; Thomas L. Sawyers, Unit Manager; William L. Thomas, Sgt.; Sharon L. Lipsccob, Co II, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and KEENAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 675
Pages: 305–306

Head Matter:
Steven E. TARPLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank B. BISHOP, Jr., Warden; William S. Bohrer, Security Chief; Thomas L. Sawyers, Unit Manager; William L. Thomas, Sgt.; Sharon L. Lipsccob, Co II, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-7086
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: January 12, 2017
Decided: January 31, 2017
Steven E. Tarpley, Appellant Pro Se. Nichole Cherie Gatewood, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and KEENAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Steven E. Tarpley appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tarpley v. Bishop, No. 1:15-cv-02049-GLR (D. Md. Aug. 2, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED