Case Name: YOUNG v. GRISWOLD MFG. CO.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1928-04-17
Citations: 25 F.2d 722
Docket Number: No. 3710
Parties: YOUNG v. GRISWOLD MFG. CO.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 25
Pages: 722–722

Head Matter:
YOUNG v. GRISWOLD MFG. CO.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
April 17, 1928.
No. 3710.
Ballard Moore, of Chicago, Ill., Fraley & Paul, of Philadelphia, Pa., and Cheever & Cox, of Chicago, Ill., for appellant.
Hugh C. Lord, of Erie, Pa., for appellee.
Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.
After argument and due consideration had, we find no sufficient ground to warrant our disturbing what we have already decided. As appears by the letter of counsel dated April 30, 1927, the defendants, in advance of the hearing by this court, knew that the infringing dampers were bought by the plaintiff. With that knowledge the case was proceeded in and submitted to our determination on the merits of the patent and infringement thereof by the sale of the dampers bought by the plaintiff. Having thus chanced the decision of the ease, the defendant will not now he heard to question a jurisdiction which it has participated in and invited exercise thereof.
Accordingly the petition is dismissed.