Case Name: UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Eulalia FIGUEIREDO, Relator-Appellant, v. DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION OF PORT OF NEW YORK, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1953-04-16
Citations: 202 F.2d 958
Docket Number: No. 214, Docket 22646
Parties: UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Eulalia FIGUEIREDO, Relator-Appellant, v. DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION OF PORT OF NEW YORK, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 202
Pages: 958–958

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Eulalia FIGUEIREDO, Relator-Appellant, v. DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION OF PORT OF NEW YORK, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 214, Docket 22646.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued April 7, 1953.
Decided April 16, 1953.
The relator appeals from dismissal of a ■writ of habeas corpus sued out to test the .legality of her detention for deportation.
Blanch Freedman and Gloria Agrin, New York City, for appellant.
Myles J. Lane, U. S. Atty., William J. Sexton, Asst. U. S. Atty., Louis Steinberg, Dist. Counsel, and Max Blau and Lester .Friedman, Attorneys, Immigration and Naturalization Service, New York City, of counsel, for appellee.
Before SWAN, Chief Judge, and CLARK and FRANK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellant's contentions that section 22 of the Subversive Control Act of 1950, 64 Stat. 987, 1006, is unconstitutional are sufficiently answered in Harisiades v. Shaughnessy, 342 U.S. 580, 72 S.Ct. 512, 96 L.Ed. 586 and Heikkila v. Barber, 73 S.Ct. 603. On the authority of those decisions the judgment is affirmed. Our mandate will be issued forthwith.