Case Name: MIDWEST SPECIAL SURGERY, P.C., Petitioner/Appellant, v. HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT PUBLISHING CO., Employer/Respondent, and AIG Property Casualty Co., Insurer/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2017-03-21
Citations: 514 S.W.3d 60
Docket Number: No. ED 104706
Parties: MIDWEST SPECIAL SURGERY, P.C., Petitioner/Appellant, v. HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT PUBLISHING CO., Employer/Respondent, and AIG Property Casualty Co., Insurer/Respondent.
Judges: Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Colleen Dolan, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 514
Pages: 60–60

Head Matter:
MIDWEST SPECIAL SURGERY, P.C., Petitioner/Appellant, v. HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT PUBLISHING CO., Employer/Respondent, and AIG Property Casualty Co., Insurer/Respondent.
No. ED 104706
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Filed: March 21, 2017
Corey D. Jackson, Columbia, MO, for Appellant
Jay C. Lory, St. Louis, MO, for Respondents
Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Colleen Dolan, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Midwest Special Surgery (Appellant) appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) denying Appellant's Application for Payment of Additional Reimbursement of Medical Fees as untimely filed. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the Commission's decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence upon the whole record. Hampton v. Big Boy Steel Erection, 121 S.W.3d 220, 222 (Mo.banc 2003). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).