Case Name: Paul Watson Enterprises, Inc. v. Miller and Smith Land, Inc.
Court: Fairfax County Circuit Court
Jurisdiction: Virginia
Decision Date: 1992-02-23
Citations: 27 Va. Cir. 139
Docket Number: Case No. (Law) 108599
Parties: Paul Watson Enterprises, Inc. v. Miller and Smith Land, Inc.
Judges: 
Reporter: Virginia Circuit Court Opinions
Volume: 27
Pages: 139–139

Head Matter:
CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY
Paul Watson Enterprises, Inc. v. Miller and Smith Land, Inc.
February 23, 1992
Case No. (Law) 108599

Opinion:
By Judge Rosemarie Annunziata
The matter before the Court is Plaintiff Paul Watson Enterprises, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the alternative, to Strike the Affirmative Defenses of the Defendant Miller and Smith Land, Inc. For the purposes of summary judgment, the Court is limited to the pleadings in this case and cannot consider the documents attached to the summary judgment motion filed by the plaintiff. Va. Sup. Ct. R. 3:18; see Janney v. Rappahannock Area Community Services Bd., 14 Va. Cir. 249, 250 (1988); Consolidated Healthcare v. Overseas Partners, Inc., 14 Va. Cir. 241, 242 (1988). After reviewing the pleadings, I find that a material fact remains in dispute as to whether the plaintiff had a real estate license at the time it contracted and performed the services for the defendant. Accordingly, the motion for summary judgment is denied.