Case Name: David BRIGHAM, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. CITY OF TOWN & COUNTRY, et al., Defendants/Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-02-09
Citations: 990 S.W.2d 23
Docket Number: No. 74004
Parties: David BRIGHAM, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. CITY OF TOWN & COUNTRY, et al., Defendants/Respondents.
Judges: Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, J., and RHODES RUSSELL, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 990
Pages: 23–24

Head Matter:
David BRIGHAM, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. CITY OF TOWN & COUNTRY, et al., Defendants/Respondents.
No. 74004.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Feb. 9, 1999.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 6, 1999.
Application to Transfer Denied June 1, 1999.
Merle L. Silverstein, Sanford J. Boxer-man, Clayton, for appellants.
Kenneth J. Heinz, Steven W. Garrett, St. Louis, for respondents.
Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, J., and RHODES RUSSELL, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Landowners appeal from the trial court's granting of summary judgment to defendant City of Town & Country on their petition challenging City's ordinance closing a private road, and seeking injunc-tive relief, declaratory relief, and damages. No error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value.
However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).