Case Name: Ralph BLANCO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1994-05-13
Citations: 636 So. 2d 588
Docket Number: No. 93-298
Parties: Ralph BLANCO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: HARRIS, C.J., and COBB and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 636
Pages: 588–588

Head Matter:
Ralph BLANCO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 93-298.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
May 13, 1994.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Lyle Hitchens, Asst. Public Defender, Dayto-na Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Barbara Arlene Fink, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We reverse because we conclude the trial court applied the incorrect standard when denying a new trial based upon newly discovered evidence. On remand, the court shall reconsider the motion and apply the standard set forth by the supreme court in Jones v. State, 591 So.2d 911 (Fla.1991).
We find no merit in appellant's remaining point on appeal.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
HARRIS, C.J., and COBB and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.