Case Name: Kevin Campise, Appellant, v. Sherman Cohen et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2003-02-27
Citations: 302 A.D.2d 332
Docket Number: 
Parties: Kevin Campise, Appellant, v Sherman Cohen et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 302
Pages: 332–333

Head Matter:
Kevin Campise, Appellant, v Sherman Cohen et al., Respondents.
[754 NYS2d 878]

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.), entered on or about September 25, 2001, which, to the extent appealed from, denied that branch of plaintiff's motion seeking summary judgment as to liability on his Labor Law § 240 (1) claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court properly denied plaintiff summary judgment as to liability on his Labor Law § 240 (1) claim since the evidence submitted on the motion raises triable issues of fact as to whether plaintiff's fall and injury were attributable in some measure to the inadequacy of the ladder as a safety device for his work (see Grogan v Norlite Corp., 282 AD2d 781 [2001]; Weber v 1111 Park Ave. Realty Corp., 253 AD2d 376 [1998]). Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Lerner and Mar-low, JJ.