Case Name: James J. HUNDLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ronald REVISH, Probation Officer; Aaron Sumpter, Probation Officer; John Doe, District Supervisor, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-08-06
Citations: 390 F. App'x 254
Docket Number: No. 10-6542
Parties: James J. HUNDLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ronald REVISH, Probation Officer; Aaron Sumpter, Probation Officer; John Doe, District Supervisor, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 390
Pages: 254–254

Head Matter:
James J. HUNDLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ronald REVISH, Probation Officer; Aaron Sumpter, Probation Officer; John Doe, District Supervisor, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 10-6542.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 27, 2010.
Decided: Aug. 6, 2010.
James J. Hundley, Appellant Pro Se.
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James J. Hundley appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hundley v. Revish, No. 1:10-cv-00068-LMB-IDD (E.D.Va. filed Mar. 31, 2010; entered Apr. 1, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.