Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Antonio MOCTEZUMA-BARRAGAN, also known as Mario Sanchez-Garcia, also known as Jose Moctezuma-Barragan, also known as Jose Moctezuma-Baragan, also known as Cleofas Moctezuma-Barragan, also known as Rodolfo Castillo, also known as Pedro Garcia, also known as Juan Gonzales, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-01-10
Citations: 672 F. App'x 482
Docket Number: No. 16-40223 Summary Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Antonio MOCTEZUMA-BARRAGAN, also known as Mario Sanchez-Garcia, also known as Jose Moctezuma-Barragan, also known as Jose Moctezuma-Baragan, also known as Cleofas Moctezuma-Barragan, also known as Rodolfo Castillo, also known as Pedro Garcia, also known as Juan Gonzales, Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 672
Pages: 482–483

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Antonio MOCTEZUMA-BARRAGAN, also known as Mario Sanchez-Garcia, also known as Jose Moctezuma-Barragan, also known as Jose Moctezuma-Baragan, also known as Cleofas Moctezuma-Barragan, also known as Rodolfo Castillo, also known as Pedro Garcia, also known as Juan Gonzales, Defendant-Appellant
No. 16-40223 Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed January 10, 2017
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Jose Antonio Moctezuma-Barragan, Pro Se
Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Antonio Moctezuma-Bar-ragan has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Moctezuma-Barragan has not filed a response. We have reviewed the relevant portions of the record as well as counsel's Anders brief, Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 28(j) letter, and response to our directive for clarification. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.