Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Lynette Acevedo, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2016-06-14
Citations: 140 A.D.3d 494
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lynette Acevedo, Appellant.
Judges: Concur — Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Webber and Gesmer, JJ.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 140
Pages: 494–495

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lynette Acevedo, Appellant.
[32 NYS3d 484]

Opinion:
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce Allen, J.), rendered January 4, 2013, as amended March 15, 2013, December 15, 2014 and January 7, 2015, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the first degree (two counts) and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing her to an aggregate term of six years, unanimously affirmed.
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007])- The element of serious physical injury was satisfied by evidence objectively supporting the jury's finding that the knife wound inflicted by defendant caused serious and protracted disfigurement, consisting of a scar on the victim's neck (see People v McKinnon, 15 NY3d 311, 315-316 [2010]). Photographs taken shortly before trial, the jury's view of the scar, medical testimony, testimony from the victim and reasonable inferences to be drawn from the evidence support the conclusion that the scar was prominent and distressing, and that it remained so at the time of trial, years after the crime (see e.g. People v Cruz, 131 AD3d 889, 889 [1st Dept 2015], Iv denied 26 NY3d 1108 [2016]).
Concur — Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Webber and Gesmer, JJ.