Case Name: Margots KAPACS Plaintiff-Appellant v. Anita JUREVICA, et al. Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-02-09
Citations: 676 F. App'x 610
Docket Number: No. 16-1885
Parties: Margots KAPACS Plaintiff-Appellant v. Anita JUREVICA, et al. Defendants-Appellees
Judges: Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 676
Pages: 610–610

Head Matter:
Margots KAPACS Plaintiff-Appellant v. Anita JUREVICA, et al. Defendants-Appellees
No. 16-1885
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: February 7, 2017
Filed: February 9, 2017
Margots Kapacs, Pro Se
Lawrence Herman Crosby, Jay Olson, Crosby & Associates, Saint Paul, MN, for Defendants-Appellees Anita Jurevica, Lawrence Herman Crosby, Jay Olson
Andrew Tweeten, Assistant Attorney General, Attorney General’s Office, Saint Paul, MN, for Defendants-Appellees Judge Martha Holton Dimick, Minnesota Court of Appeals
Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Margots Kapacs appeals after the district court dismissed his pro se complaint alleging violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act. Upon careful review, we conclude the action was properly dismissed for the reasons stated in the district court's order. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommenda-tíons of the Honorable Franklin L, Noel, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.