Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Craig William FRAZIER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-08-16
Citations: 668 F. App'x 262
Docket Number: No. 15-30135
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Craig William FRAZIER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 668
Pages: 262–263

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Craig William FRAZIER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-30135
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted August 12, 2016
Filed August 16, 2016
Jessica Anne Betley, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Carl E. Rostad, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Great Falls, MT, Leif Johnson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Billings, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Craig William Frazier, Pro Se
Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument, See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Frazier appeals from the district court's order denying his "Rule 60(b) and 3582 Motion to Reduce Sentence." Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Frazier's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Frazier the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R, 36-3.