Case Name: In the Matter of D.K., Appellant, v. Gladys Carrion, as Commissioner of the New York State Office of Children and Family Services, et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2015-03-18
Citations: 126 A.D.3d 900
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of D.K., Appellant, v Gladys Carrion, as Commissioner of the New York State Office of Children and Family Services, et al., Respondents.
Judges: Mastro, J.P., Dillon, Hall and Miller, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 126
Pages: 900–901

Head Matter:
In the Matter of D.K., Appellant, v Gladys Carrion, as Commissioner of the New York State Office of Children and Family Services, et al., Respondents.
[2 NYS3d 918]

Opinion:
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York State Office of Children and Family Services denying the petitioner's application to expunge a sealed, unfounded report maintained by the New York State Central Register of Child Abuse and Maltreatment, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Warhit, J.), dated December 16, 2013, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The petitioner filed a petition pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination denying his application to expunge a sealed, unfounded report maintained by the New York State Central Register of Child Abuse and Maltreatment. The Supreme Court denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.
The agency's determination to deny the petitioner's request to expunge the sealed, unfounded report, on the basis that he failed to present clear and convincing written evidence affirmatively refuting the allegations in the report, was not arbitrary and capricious or an abuse of discretion (see Social Services Law § 422 [5] [c]; Matter of Williamson v New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs., 112 AD3d 730 [2013]; Matter of Anonymous v New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs., 53 AD3d 810, 812 [2008]; cf. Matter of Jan V. v State of N.Y. Off. of Children & Family Servs., 38 AD3d 912 [2007]).
The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.
Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding (see CPLR 7803).
Mastro, J.P., Dillon, Hall and Miller, JJ., concur.