Case Name: In re Dwayne DELESTON, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-06-04
Citations: 522 F. App'x 195
Docket Number: No. 13-1296
Parties: In re Dwayne DELESTON, Petitioner.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 522
Pages: 195–195

Head Matter:
In re Dwayne DELESTON, Petitioner.
No. 13-1296.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 30, 2013.
Decided: June 4, 2013.
Dwayne Deleston, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Dwayne Deleston petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) motion and two related Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motions. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pau-peris, deny the motion to compel, and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.