Case Name: SMITH et ux, Petitioners, v. OREGON LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1972-12-08
Citations: 11 Or. App. 485
Docket Number: 
Parties: SMITH et ux, Petitioners, v. OREGON LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION, Respondent.
Judges: Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Foley and Fort, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 11
Pages: 485–485

Head Matter:
Argued November 30,
affirmed December 8, 1972,
petition for review denied January 17, 1973
SMITH et ux, Petitioners, v. OREGON LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION, Respondent.
503 P2d 521
R. W. Kitson, Portland, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Rader & Batson, Portland.
Al J. Lane, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Lee Johnson, Attorney General, and John W. Osburn, Solicitor General, Salem.
Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Foley and Fort, Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Perry v. Oregon Liquor Commission, 180 Or 495, 177 P2d 406 (1947).