Case Name: In re Lemoyne VENEY, a/k/a Victor Demaris, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-10-22
Citations: 621 F. App'x 191
Docket Number: No. 15-1900
Parties: In re Lemoyne VENEY, a/k/a Victor Demaris, Petitioner.
Judges: Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 621
Pages: 191–191

Head Matter:
In re Lemoyne VENEY, a/k/a Victor Demaris, Petitioner.
No. 15-1900.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 20, 2015.
Decided: Oct. 22, 2015.
Lemoyne Veney, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Lemoyne Veney petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.