Case Name: Rosser, solicitor-general, et al. v. Lam Amusement Co. et al.
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1938-03-10
Citations: 185 Ga. 725
Docket Number: No. 12155
Parties: Rosser, solicitor-general, et al. v. Lam Amusement Co. et al.
Judges: All the Justices concur.
Reporter: Georgia Reports
Volume: 185
Pages: 725–726

Head Matter:
Rosser, solicitor-general, et al. v. Lam Amusement Co. et al.
No. 12155.
March 10, 1938.

Opinion:
Atkinson, Presiding Justice.
The allegations of the petition as set forth in the accompanying statement of facts, show a cause of action for injunctive relief. Rose Theater v. Lilly, 185 Ga. 53 (193 S. E. 866); Atkinson v. Lam Amusement Co., 185 Ga. 379 (195 S. E. 156). The judge erred in sustaining the demurrer to the petition and dismissing the action. See Thompson v. Atlanta, 178 Ga. 281 (2) (172 S. E. 915).
Judgment reversed.
All the Justices concur.
Maddox, Matthews & Owens, for plaintiff.
Lanham & Parker and Wright & Covington, for defendant.