Case Name: Latif RASHE'D, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gene JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections; Fred Schilling, Medical Director, Virginia Department of Corrections; Layton Lester, Warden, James River Correctional Center; William V. Purcell, Physician, James River Correctional Center; B. Ragland, Assistant Warden, James River Correctional Center, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-04-26
Citations: 375 F. App'x 358
Docket Number: No. 09-7667
Parties: Latif RASHE’D, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Gene JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections; Fred Schilling, Medical Director, Virginia Department of Corrections; Layton Lester, Warden, James River Correctional Center; William V. Purcell, Physician, James River Correctional Center; B. Ragland, Assistant Warden, James River Correctional Center, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 375
Pages: 358–359

Head Matter:
Latif RASHE’D, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Gene JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections; Fred Schilling, Medical Director, Virginia Department of Corrections; Layton Lester, Warden, James River Correctional Center; William V. Purcell, Physician, James River Correctional Center; B. Ragland, Assistant Warden, James River Correctional Center, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 09-7667.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 22, 2010.
Decided: April 26, 2010.
Latif Rashe’d, Appellant Pro Se.
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Latif Rashe'd appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee or to apply to proceed in forma pauperis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. As the district court dismissed Rashe'd's complaint without prejudice, his remedy is to refile his complaint along with an application to proceed in forma pauperis or submit the required filing fee. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rashe'd v. Johnson, No. l:09-cv-00571-AJT-IDD (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 3, 2009 & entered Aug. 5, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.