Case Name: CHARLES HORTMAN, APPELLANT, v. J. H. MORRIS COMPANY, RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1933-01-05
Citations: 110 N.J.L. 15
Docket Number: 
Parties: CHARLES HORTMAN, APPELLANT, v. J. H. MORRIS COMPANY, RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 110
Pages: 15–15

Head Matter:
CHARLES HORTMAN, APPELLANT, v. J. H. MORRIS COMPANY, RESPONDENT.
Argued October 25, 1932
Decided January 5, 1933.
For the appellant, Frank I. Casey.
For the respondent, James J. McGoogan.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court, and printed in 10 N. J. Mis. R. 262.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Brogan, Heher, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.