Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Joseph McANDREW, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-04-25
Citations: 470 F. App'x 801
Docket Number: No. 11-14795
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Joseph McANDREW, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 470
Pages: 801–801

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Joseph McANDREW, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-14795
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
April 25, 2012.
Linda Julin McNamara, Colleen D. Murphy-Davis, Robert E. O’Neill, Josephine W. Thomas, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Mary A. Mills, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Tampa, FL, Rosemary Cakmis, Craig L. Crawford, Donna Lee Elm, Adam Scott Tanenbaum, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Orlando, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before BARKETT, PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
James Joseph McAndrew appeals his sentence of 720 months of imprisonment for knowingly possessing child pornography that was transported in interstáte commerce, 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B), and knowingly . receiving child pornography that was transported in interstate commerce, id. § 2252A(a)(2). McAndrew argues that the government materially breached its written plea agreement to recommend a sentence within the advisory guideline range. See United States v. Johnson, 132 F.3d 628, 631 (11th Cir.1998). The government confesses error. The government concedes that, at resentencing, it breached the plea agreement by asking the district court to sentence McAndrew above the guideline range to the maximum term of imprisonment. We vacate and remand this case for a new sentencing hearing before a different district court judge.
VACATED AND REMANDED.