Case Name: Noah BOLDON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1999-03-23
Citations: 740 So. 2d 15
Docket Number: No. 98-3341
Parties: Noah BOLDON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: ALLEN, WEBSTER and VAN NORTWICK, JJ„ concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 740
Pages: 15–16

Head Matter:
Noah BOLDON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 98-3341.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
March 23, 1999.
Noah Boldon, pro se, petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Noah Boldon petitions this court for a writ of mandamus, complaining of the trial court's failure to rule on his motion to withdraw his plea. However, it appears that the motion was made at a time when petitioner was represented by counsel in the trial court and therefore the trial judge was within his discretion to treat the motion as a nullity and disregard it. Smith v. State, 444 So.2d 542, 547 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).
The petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.
ALLEN, WEBSTER and VAN NORTWICK, JJ" concur.