Case Name: James S. Woods, Respondent, v. Brooklyn Edison Company, Inc., Appellant, and Annie Fischer and Louis Fischer, Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1929-06
Citations: 227 A.D. 604
Docket Number: 
Parties: James S. Woods, Respondent, v. Brooklyn Edison Company, Inc., Appellant, and Annie Fischer and Louis Fischer, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 227
Pages: 604–604

Head Matter:
James S. Woods, Respondent, v. Brooklyn Edison Company, Inc., Appellant, and Annie Fischer and Louis Fischer, Respondents.

Opinion:
Judgment, as amended, and order denying motion for a new trial unanimously affirmed, with costs. The evidence supports the verdict against appellant and the jury's finding in favor of defendants Fischer was fully permitted by the testimony. These conclusions render unnecessary a determination of the application and effect of section 211-a of the Civil Practice Act. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Kapper and Seeger, JJ.