Case Name: Clive HOFFMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Derrick WADSWORTH, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-06-19
Citations: 37 F. App'x 673
Docket Number: No. 02-6646
Parties: Clive HOFFMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Derrick WADSWORTH, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 37
Pages: 673–673

Head Matter:
Clive HOFFMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Derrick WADSWORTH, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 02-6646.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted June 13, 2002.
Decided June 19, 2002.
Clive Hoffman, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Clive Hoffman appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we. affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Hoffman v. Wadsworth, No. CA-01-851-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Apr. 10, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.