Case Name: In re the Marriage of Janice Marie TOLIVER (Schumacher), Appellant, v. William Carl TOLIVER, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1981-09-01
Citations: 621 S.W.2d 376
Docket Number: No. WD 32260
Parties: In re the Marriage of Janice Marie TOLIVER (Schumacher), Appellant, v. William Carl TOLIVER, Respondent.
Judges: Before TURNAGE, P. J., and CLARK and LOWENSTEIN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 621
Pages: 376–376

Head Matter:
In re the Marriage of Janice Marie TOLIVER (Schumacher), Appellant, v. William Carl TOLIVER, Respondent.
No. WD 32260.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Sept. 1, 1981.
Donald L. Allen, Lee’s Summit, for appellant.
John J. McFadden, Jr., Kodas, Reed, Gingrich & McFadden, Kansas City, for respondent.
Before TURNAGE, P. J., and CLARK and LOWENSTEIN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
William Toliver filed a motion to reduce the child support he was paying to Janice Marie Toliver Schumacher of $150.00 per month for each of two children. Janice, in turn, filed a motion requesting the amount be increased. The court, after hearing the evidence, ordered the child support payments for each child reduced from $150.00 to $100.00 per month, and overruled Janice's motion. Janice appeals.
A review of the record reveals that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight thereof. An opinion would have no precedential value. Under Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976), the judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
The motion to dismiss the appeal for failure to comply with the rules in the points relied on is overruled.