Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael L. MOORE, a/k/a Gadget, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-09-29
Citations: 447 F. App'x 511
Docket Number: No. 11-6683
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael L. MOORE, a/k/a Gadget, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before AGEE, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 447
Pages: 511–512

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael L. MOORE, a/k/a Gadget, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-6683.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 13, 2011.
Decided: Sept. 29, 2011.
Michael L. Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Raymond Edward Patricco, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before AGEE, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael L. Moore appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Moore, No. 1:97-cr-00362-JCC-1 (ED.Va. Oct. 7, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.