Case Name: Anthony FORNEY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-02-27
Citations: 594 So. 2d 305
Docket Number: No. 76900
Parties: Anthony FORNEY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, barkett, grimes, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 594
Pages: 305–306

Head Matter:
Anthony FORNEY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 76900.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Feb. 27, 1992.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Jeffrey L. Anderson, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Melvina Racey Flaherty, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have for review Forney v. State, 567 So.2d 60 (Fla. 4th D.C.A.1990), which certified the same question recently answered by the Court in Barfield v. State, 594 So.2d 259 (Fla.1992). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We quash the opinion below and remand for reconsideration in light of Barfield.
It is so ordered.
SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, barkett, grimes, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.