Case Name: Jay GUSS, Respondent/Employee, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Appellant/Employer
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-12-26
Citations: 63 S.W.3d 684
Docket Number: No. ED 79580
Parties: Jay GUSS, Respondent/Employee, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Appellant/Employer.
Judges: Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, J., and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 63
Pages: 684–685

Head Matter:
Jay GUSS, Respondent/Employee, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Appellant/Employer.
No. ED 79580.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Dec. 26, 2001.
Daniel J. Harlan, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
James F. Malone, Paul K. Petraborg, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, J., and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
General Motors Corporation, employer, appeals from an award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission granting claimant, Jay Gus, workers' compensation benefits due to an injury that he sustained while employed by General Motors Corp. Employer asserts the commission erred because claimant failed to prove medical causation. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. The award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. An opinion would have no precedential value.
The award is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).