Case Name: DYER CO. v. MERGENS
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1923-02-19
Citations: 1 Ohio Law Abs. 283
Docket Number: No. 4220
Parties: DYER CO. v. MERGENS
Judges: 
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 1
Pages: 283–283

Head Matter:
No. 242
DYER CO. v. MERGENS
Ohio Court of Appeals, Cuyahoga County
No. 4220.
Feb. 19, 1923
This opinion has not been published except in Abstract.
ERROR — (1) Verdict not manifestly against the weight of the evidence and will not be disturbed.
Error to Municipal Court of Cleveland
Attorneys — Thompson, Hiñe & Flory, for Dyer Co.; M. Y. Yost, for Mergens.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Epitomized Opinion
Mergens recovered $300 from the Dyer Co. in the lower court and a motion for a new trial being overruled, error is prosecuted to this court to reverse said judgment.
Held by Court of Appeals in affirming judgment of Municipal Court:
1.When the only question involved in a case is the weight of the evidence, unless the judgment is manifestly against the weight of the evidence, it will not be revrsed.