Case Name: Marva MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri and Missouri Department of Social Services, Division of Youth Services, Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2016-03-01
Citations: 482 S.W.3d 826
Docket Number: No. ED 102738
Parties: Marva MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri and Missouri Department of Social Services, Division of Youth Services, Respondents.
Judges: Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 482
Pages: 826–827

Head Matter:
Marva MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri and Missouri Department of Social Services, Division of Youth Services, Respondents.
No. ED 102738
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Filed: March 1, 2016
Marva Miller, Pro Se, 1224 Fairview Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, for Appellant.
Chris Foster, Attorney General, Jillian Meek Mueller, Assistant Attorney General, Philip Sholtz, P.O. Box 861, St. Louis, Missouri 63188, for Respondents.
Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Marva Miller appeals the summary judgment entered by the trial court in favor of defendant Missouri Department of Social Services ("DSS") on her claims of employment discrimination under the Missouri Human Rights Act (the "MHRA") and retaliation under the Workers' Compensation statute. Because Miller fails to present a plausible account of facts indicating that unlawful discrimination or retaliation occurred in this case, we find that the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of DSS. Accordingly, we affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and have determined that an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).