Case Name: Stanley W. DERING, Defendant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1994-03-15
Citations: 872 S.W.2d 137
Docket Number: No. 64748
Parties: Stanley W. DERING, Defendant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINBARD and CRIST, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 872
Pages: 137–137

Head Matter:
Stanley W. DERING, Defendant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent.
No. 64748.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
March 15, 1994.
Rosalynn Koch, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for defendant/appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Cheryl A. Caponegro, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff/respondent.
Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINBARD and CRIST, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).