Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jemel D. COLEMAN, Appellant.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2018-08-14
Citations: 553 S.W.3d 892
Docket Number: No. ED 105558
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent,
v.
Jemel D. COLEMAN, Appellant.
Judges: Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J. and Mary K. Hoff, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 553
Pages: 892–892

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent,
v.
Jemel D. COLEMAN, Appellant.
No. ED 105558
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Filed: August 14, 2018
FOR APPELLANT: Gwenda R. Robinson, Missouri Public Defender's Office, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101.
FOR RESPONDENT: Gregory L. Barnes, Assistant Attorney General, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.
Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J. and Mary K. Hoff, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Jemel Coleman ("Appellant") appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis convicting him of seven felonies. In point one, Appellant argues the trial court erred by submitting jury instructions that provided for accomplice liability because there was insufficient evidence to support an inference that Appellant was an accomplice to another's crime. In point two, Appellant argues the trial court erred by declining to dismiss two armed criminal action charges predicated on unlawful use of a firearm charges.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the trial court did not err in submitting jury instructions or by declining to dismiss the armed criminal action charges predicated on unlawful use of the firearms charges. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. Rule 30.25(b).