Case Name: Glen BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1989-12-05
Citations: 783 S.W.2d 428
Docket Number: No. 56191
Parties: Glen BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 783
Pages: 428–429

Head Matter:
Glen BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 56191.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Dec. 5, 1989.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 11, 1990.
Dorothy Mae Hirzy, Sp. Public Defender, James S. McKay, St. Louis, for appellant.
William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Glen Brown, appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court dismissed movant's motion as untimely because it was not filed before June 30, 1988. Rule 29.15(m). The time limits as to when a Rule 29.15 motion must be filed are constitutional. Day v. State, 770 S.W.2d 692, 696[3] (Mo.banc 1989). The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(j). An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).