Case Name: BARKER v. FORREST
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1910-03-08
Citations: 26 Okla. 12
Docket Number: No. 433
Parties: BARKER v. FORREST.
Judges: All the Justices concur.
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 26
Pages: 12–12

Head Matter:
BARKER v. FORREST.
No. 433.
Opinion Filed March 8, 1910.
(108 Pac. 407.)
APPEAL AND ERROR — Failure to File Briefs — Dismissal. Where no .briefs have been filed by the plaintiff in error, in accordance with rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi), a motion having -been made after notice that the appeal be dismissed on that ground, and no response having been made thereto giving a satisfactory reason for such failure to comply with such rule, the appeal will be dismissed.-
('Syllabus by the Court.)
Error from District Court, Canadian County; Joseph G. Lowe, Judge.
Action between E. B. B.arker and R. B, Forrest. From the judgment, Barker brings error.
Dismissed.
W. A. Maurer and Don C. Smith, for plaintiff in error.
R. B. Forrest, pro se.

Opinion:
WILLIAMS, J.
The appeal in this case was lodged in this court on October 1, 1908, and the case was regularly assigned for trial at the regular January, 1910, term, which began January 11, 1910. Prior to the time that said case was reached on the calendar, to wit, on January 18, 1910, the defendant in error moved that the appeal be dismissed, for the reason that the plaintiff in error had not prepared and served a brief upon the defendant in error, in compliance with rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi). The plaintiff in error having had due service of the filing of said motion, and not having responded thereto, and no brief having been filed in this ease, the motion is accordingly sustained, and the appeal dismissed.
All the Justices concur.