Case Name: Jamie FAULKNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-05-09
Citations: 366 S.W.3d 85
Docket Number: No. ED 96985
Parties: Jamie FAULKNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 366
Pages: 85–86

Head Matter:
Jamie FAULKNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 96985.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
May 9, 2012.
Andrew E. Zleit, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Chris Foster, Atty. Gen., Shaun J. Mackelprang, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Jamie Faulkner appeals the motion court's denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorándum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2) & (6).