Case Name: Jimmy Lee WARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2018-06-06
Citations: 244 So. 3d 1129
Docket Number: No. 4D16–1193
Parties: Jimmy Lee WARD, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 244
Pages: 1129–1130

Head Matter:
Jimmy Lee WARD, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D16-1193
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
[June 6, 2018]
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Peggy Natale, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Joseph D. Coronato, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
A simple addition error on appellant's sentencing scoresheet led the state, defendant, and the trial judge to believe that appellant's lowest permissible sentence was 99.45 months instead of 57.45 months. The scoresheet error is not harmless because the record does not conclusively show that the judge would have sentenced the defendant to the same 99.45 month prison term, having stated that he was not inclined to "go against" the scoresheet. See Brooks v. State , 969 So.2d 238, 241 (Fla. 2007) ("When scoresheet error is presented . any error is harmless if the record conclusively shows that the trial court would have imposed the same sentence using a correct scoresheet.") (emphasis in original). We therefore reverse and remand to the circuit court for resentencing.
Gerber, C.J., Gross and Conner, JJ., concur.