Case Name: ARNOLD v. TRAUBERMAN et al
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1923-06-16
Citations: 2 Ohio Law Abs. 664
Docket Number: No. 2182
Parties: ARNOLD v. TRAUBERMAN et al
Judges: 
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 2
Pages: 664–664

Head Matter:
No. 695
ARNOLD v. TRAUBERMAN et al
No. 2182.
June 16, 1923
Ohio Appeals, 1st Dist., Hamilton County
915. PERSONAL INJURIES — Verdict held proper under circumstances of case.
Attorneys — Taft & Taft, for Arnold; De Camp, Sutphin & Brumleve, for Trauberman et al; all of Cincinnati.

Opinion:
HAMILTON, J.
Epitomized Opinion
Published Only in Ohio Law Abstract
Trauberman brought an action in the Muni-vipal Court of Cincinnati for personal injuries which he claimed were caused by the negligence of one Arnold and one Huber. The plaintiff claimed that the cars of the two defendants collided at a street intersection and that Huber's car was forced upon the sidewalk against defendant. Plaintiff recovered a verdict for $300 against Arnold alone. The Municipal Court reduced this to $24)0 and entered judgment for the plaintiff. Arnold prosecuted error. In sustaining the judgment of the lower court, the Court of Appeals held:
1. That there was no prejudicial error in the record which would justify a new trial and moreover, that the verdict was not manifestly against the weight of the evidence.