Case Name: David L. BISHOP, et al., Respondents, v. CHARLES F. VATTEROTT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-01-26
Citations: 988 S.W.2d 541
Docket Number: No. 73816
Parties: David L. BISHOP, et al., Respondents, v. CHARLES F. VATTEROTT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Appellant.
Judges: Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, J., and MARY RHODES RUSSELL, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 988
Pages: 541–542

Head Matter:
David L. BISHOP, et al., Respondents, v. CHARLES F. VATTEROTT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Appellant.
No. 73816.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Jan. 26, 1999.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 6, 1999.
S. Francis Baldwin, St. Ann, MO, for appellant.
Katherine L. Butler, Patrick S. Butler, Eureka, MO, for respondent.
Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, J., and MARY RHODES RUSSELL, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Construction company appeals the trial court's order denying its Motion to Proceed with Arbitration on homeowners' breach of contract claim. No error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).