Case Name: Arnie C. DIENOFF, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. COMMUNITY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT OF THE COUNTY OF ST. LOUIS, Kathleen Burkett, Lillian Kent, and William Klinghammer, Defendants/Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1997-08-05
Citations: 949 S.W.2d 288
Docket Number: No. 71669
Parties: Arnie C. DIENOFF, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. COMMUNITY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT OF THE COUNTY OF ST. LOUIS, Kathleen Burkett, Lillian Kent, and William Klinghammer, Defendants/Respondents.
Judges: Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and DOWD, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 949
Pages: 288–288

Head Matter:
Arnie C. DIENOFF, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. COMMUNITY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT OF THE COUNTY OF ST. LOUIS, Kathleen Burkett, Lillian Kent, and William Klinghammer, Defendants/Respondents.
No. 71669.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Six.
Aug. 5, 1997.
Kenneth H. Gilbert, St. Louis, for plaintiff/appellant.
Joseph A. Lott, Clayton, for defendants/respondents.
Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and DOWD, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
Plaintiff appeals from the judgment dismissing his petition for injunctive and declaratory relief. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).