Case Name: Atrin STRONG, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-12-09
Citations: 122 S.W.3d 704
Docket Number: No. ED 82586
Parties: Atrin STRONG, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., and MARY R. RUSSELL, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 122
Pages: 704–704

Head Matter:
Atrin STRONG, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 82586.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Dec. 9, 2003.
Robert W. Lundt, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Dora A. Fichter, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., and MARY R. RUSSELL, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Atrin Strong ("Movant") appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).