Case Name: Bobbye Sikes WICKE, Appellant, v. Joan T. SIKES, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-10-23
Citations: 828 So. 2d 495
Docket Number: No. 1D02-2633
Parties: Bobbye Sikes WICKE, Appellant, v. Joan T. SIKES, Appellee.
Judges: ERVIN, BARFIELD and WOLF, JJ„ concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 828
Pages: 495–495

Head Matter:
Bobbye Sikes WICKE, Appellant, v. Joan T. SIKES, Appellee.
No. 1D02-2633.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Oct. 23, 2002.
Bobbye Sikes Wicke, pro se.
T. Sol Johnson, Milton, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Having considered the appellant's response to this Court's order of September 11, 2002, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The order on appeal, Order Granting Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment and Respondent's Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs, dated April 29, 2002, is not a final order and the appeal was prematurely taken where this order does not in fact dispose of the case. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.110(m) (2002). "An order which merely grants a motion for summary judgment without more, is not an appealable final order." McQuaig v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 789 So.2d 1215, 1215 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). The appellant s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.
DISMISSED.
ERVIN, BARFIELD and WOLF, JJ" concur.