Case Name: Albert Mechtold, Respondent, v. William S. Tilford, as Building Inspector of the Town of Oyster Bay, et al., Defendants, and Jean V. Kessler et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1955-05-09
Citations: 285 A.D. 1164
Docket Number: 
Parties: Albert Mechtold, Respondent, v. William S. Tilford, as Building Inspector of the Town of Oyster Bay, et al., Defendants, and Jean V. Kessler et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 285
Pages: 1164–1165

Head Matter:
Albert Mechtold, Respondent, v. William S. Tilford, as Building Inspector of the Town of Oyster Bay, et al., Defendants, and Jean V. Kessler et al., Appellants.

Opinion:
-In an action by a taxpayer, pursuant to section 51 of the General Municipal Law, to enjoin the construction of a certain dwelling house, defendants other than the Town of Oyster Bay and its building inspector appeal from an order dated July 22, 1954, granting plaintiff's motion for an injunction pendente lite and denying the motion of the appealing defendants to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and from an order of resettlement dated August 17, 1954. Resettled order dated August 17, 1954, modified by striking out of the paragraph which grants the injunction everything beginning with the words "and are further enjoined" and ending with the words "in question". As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. Respondent's motion papers sought an injunction only with respect to the construction of one particular dwelling, consistent with the cause of action set forth in the complaint. The injunction should not have been made to extend to thirty-two additional constructions. Appeal from order dated July 22, 1954, dismissed, without costs. That order was superseded by the order of resettlement. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Beldock and Ughetta, JJ., concur. [205 Misc. 1063.]