Case Name: The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Pedro PEREZ, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1986-07-22
Citations: 491 So. 2d 339
Docket Number: Nos. 85-2802, 85-2804
Parties: The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Pedro PEREZ, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUB-BART and BASKIN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 491
Pages: 339–339

Head Matter:
The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Pedro PEREZ, Appellee.
Nos. 85-2802, 85-2804.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 22, 1986.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Charles M. Fahlbusch, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.
Armando A. Perez, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUB-BART and BASKIN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The state appeals from an order suppressing evidence in a probation violation proceeding. We reject the state's contention that the exclusionary rule does not apply to probation violation hearings. State v. Cross, 487 So.2d 1056 (Fla.1986). We reverse the order suppressing the evidence, however, because the unrebutted evidence before the trial court established that the search of the bag was accomplished with defendant Perez's consent. Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218, 93 S.Ct. 2041, 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973); Burke v. State, 465 So.2d 1337 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985).
Reversed and remanded.