Case Name: Abdo H. Alkaifi, Respondent, v. Celestial Church of Christ Calvary Parish, Appellant, et al., Defendant. Martin Hoffman, Intervenor-Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2007-10-09
Citations: 44 A.D.3d 695
Docket Number: 
Parties: Abdo H. Alkaifi, Respondent, v Celestial Church of Christ Calvary Parish, Appellant, et al., Defendant. Martin Hoffman, Intervenor-Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 44
Pages: 695–696

Head Matter:
Abdo H. Alkaifi, Respondent, v Celestial Church of Christ Calvary Parish, Appellant, et al., Defendant. Martin Hoffman, Intervenor-Respondent.
[842 NYS2d 722]

Opinion:
22] In an actionto foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Celestial Church of Christ Calvary Parish appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Agate, J.), dated May 19, 2006, which, upon remittitur from this Court (see Alkaifi v Celestial Church of Christ Calvary Parish, 24 AD3d 476 [2005]), after a hearing, denied those branches of its motion which were, in effect, to set aside a foreclosure sale conducted on February 8, 2002, and to vacate the referee's deed in foreclosure.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to the plaintiff-respondent and the intervenor-respondent.
By order dated April 7, 2004, the Supreme Court denied the appellant's motion, inter alia, to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale dated June 5, 2000, in effect, to set aside a foreclosure sale conducted on February 8, 2002, and to vacate the referee's deed in foreclosure. In Alkaifi v Celestial Church of Christ Calvary Parish (24 AD3d 476 [2005]), we modified the order and remitted the matter for a hearing to resolve disputed factual issues and for a new determination as to whether there exists a basis to set aside the foreclosure sale and to vacate the referee's deed in foreclosure. At the hearing, the appellant failed to demonstrate that the disputed factual issues should be resolved in its favor. Accordingly, the Supreme Court, upon remittitur, properly determined that there was no basis to set aside the foreclosure sale and the referee's deed in foreclosure. Rivera, J.P., Ritter, Santucci and Dillon, JJ., concur.