Case Name: Antoinne STEWART, Employee/Appellant, v. SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE, Employer/Respondent, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2014-11-25
Citations: 451 S.W.3d 300
Docket Number: No. ED 101366 and ED 101323
Parties: Antoinne STEWART, Employee/Appellant, v. SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE, Employer/Respondent, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent.
Judges: Before Angela T. Quigless, C.J., Patricia L. Cohen, J., and Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 451
Pages: 300–301

Head Matter:
Antoinne STEWART, Employee/Appellant, v. SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE, Employer/Respondent, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent.
No. ED 101366 and ED 101323
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION FIVE
Filed: November 25, 2014
Rehearing Denied December 30, 2014
John J. Ammann, St. Louis University Legal Clinic, 10 N. Tucker Blvd., St. Louis, Missouri 63101, for Appellant.
Christine K. Lesicko, P.O. Box 59, Jefferson City, Missouri 65104, for Respondent Division of Employment Security.
Paula Finlay, 909 Chestnut, Room 3550, St. Louis, Missouri 63101, for Respondent Southwestern Bell Telephone.
Before Angela T. Quigless, C.J., Patricia L. Cohen, J., and Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Employee Antoinne Stewart appeals the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission ("Commission") determining that he is ineligible for employment benefits. We affirm the Commission's order.
No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).