Case Name: Johnny Michael PERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Barb MORRONE; Juanita Staten; Richard Perry; Ric Morrone; Mabel Smith; Wayne County Sheriffs Department; City of Kenova, West Virginia; Jim Perry; David Perry; Dorothy Perry; Mildred Mitchell-Bateman Hospital, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-03-14
Citations: 123 F. App'x 117
Docket Number: No. 04-2461
Parties: Johnny Michael PERRY, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Barb MORRONE; Juanita Staten; Richard Perry; Ric Morrone; Mabel Smith; Wayne County Sheriffs Department; City of Kenova, West Virginia; Jim Perry; David Perry; Dorothy Perry; Mildred Mitchell-Bateman Hospital, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 123
Pages: 117–118

Head Matter:
Johnny Michael PERRY, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Barb MORRONE; Juanita Staten; Richard Perry; Ric Morrone; Mabel Smith; Wayne County Sheriffs Department; City of Kenova, West Virginia; Jim Perry; David Perry; Dorothy Perry; Mildred Mitchell-Bateman Hospital, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 04-2461.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 10, 2005.
Decided: March 14, 2005.
Johnny Michael Perry, Appellant pro se.
Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Johnny Michael Perry appeals the district court's order accepting the recom mendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil actions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Perry v. Morrone, Nos. CA-04-792; Ca-04-793; CA-04-794; CA-04-795; CA-04-796; CA-04-797; CA-04-798; CA-04-799; CA-04-810; CA-04-1080; CA-04-1111 (S.D.W. Va. filed Nov. 3, 2004; entered Nov. 4, 2004 and Nov. 5, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED