Case Name: Cheryl SCHWENDER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ERIE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-12-28
Citations: 158 F. App'x 488
Docket Number: No. 05-1483
Parties: Cheryl SCHWENDER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ERIE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant — Appellee.
Judges: Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 158
Pages: 488–488

Head Matter:
Cheryl SCHWENDER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ERIE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant — Appellee.
No. 05-1483.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 22, 2005.
Decided Dec. 28, 2005.
Cheryl Schwender, Appellant Pro Se. James Downey Lamp, Sheryl Ann Rucker, Lamp, Odell, Bartram, Levy & Trautwein, PLLC, Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Cheryl Schwender appeals from the district court's orders denying her motion and renewed motion for a more definite response and denying relief in her civil action in which she asserted that her insurance company engaged in unfair insurance practices in determining that she was at fault in an automobile accident. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Schwender v. Erie Ins. Co., No. CA-03-94-5 (N.D.W. Va. Apr. 1 & 5, 2005). We deny Erie Insurance Company's motion for sanctions and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED