Case Name: Ogdensburgh & Lake Champlain R. Co. v. The Nashua & Lowell R. Co.
Court: United States Circuit Court for the District of New Hampshire
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1881-02-24
Citations: 5 F. 882
Docket Number: 
Parties: Ogdensburgh & Lake Champlain R. Co. v. The Nashua & Lowell R. Co.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter
Volume: 5
Pages: 882–882

Head Matter:
Ogdensburgh & Lake Champlain R. Co. v. The Nashua & Lowell R. Co.
(Circuit Court, D. New Hampshire.
February 24, 1881.)
In Equity. Demurrer.
Sidney Bartlett and Wallace Hachett, for plaintiff.
F. A. Brooks, for defendants.

Opinion:
The bill in this case- is like that passed upon in Ogdensburgh & Lake Champlain R. Co. v. Boston & Lowell R. Corp., 4 Fed. Rep. 64, and has not been amended to meet the objections sustained in that case.
The order must therefore must be: Demurrer sustained.