Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. TRAVIS CHARLES WILSON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2016-12-07
Citations: 282 Or. App. 717
Docket Number: 12C49583, 14C44145; A159196 (Control), A159197
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. TRAVIS CHARLES WILSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Tookey, Judge, and Shorr, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 282
Pages: 717–718

Head Matter:
Submitted September 2,
reversed and remanded December 7, 2016
STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. TRAVIS CHARLES WILSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Marion County Circuit Court
12C49583, 14C44145; A159196 (Control), A159197
385 P3d 1233
Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Ingrid A. MacFarlane, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.
Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Jonathan N. Schildt, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Tookey, Judge, and Shorr, Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
In these consolidated appeals, defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for felon in possession of a firearm in Case No. 14C44145 and a judgment revoking his probation in Case No. 12C49583. He assigns error to the trial court's denial of his suppression motion in Case No. 14C44145 and its revocation of his probation in Case No. 12C49583 based on the conviction in Case No. 14C44145.
In Case No. 14C44145, defendant moved to suppress evidence that an Oregon State Police trooper discovered during a traffic stop, which led to the charge of felon in possession of a firearm, ORS 166.270. After the trial court denied the motion, defendant entered a conditional plea of guilty to that charge, reserving his right to appeal the trial court's ruling on the suppression motion. See ORS 135.335(3). In Case No. 12C49583, defendant admitted to violating his probation based on his plea to the felon-in-possession charge in Case No. 14C44145, and the court revoked his probation. The state concedes that the trial court erred in denying defendant's suppression motion and, consequently, that both judgments must be reversed and remanded. We agree, accept the state's concession, and reverse and remand.
Reversed and remanded.
A second charge, for possession of methamphetamine, ORS 475.894, was later dismissed.