Case Name: Robert H. WRIGHT, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John GOODRICH, Deputy, Jerald Watson, Defendant-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-04-12
Citations: 685 F. App'x 731
Docket Number: No. 16-16281
Parties: Robert H. WRIGHT, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John GOODRICH, Deputy, Jerald Watson, Defendant-Appellants.
Judges: Before WILSON and BLACK Circuit Judges, and RESTANI, Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 685
Pages: 731–731

Head Matter:
Robert H. WRIGHT, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John GOODRICH, Deputy, Jerald Watson, Defendant-Appellants.
No. 16-16281
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
(April 12, 2017)
Craig Thomas Jones, The Orlando Firm, LLC, Decatur, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Russell A. Britt, Kenneth Drew Jones, Hall Booth Smith, PC, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellant
Before WILSON and BLACK Circuit Judges, and RESTANI, Judge.
Honorable Jane A. Restani, Judge for the United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
After careful review of the briefs and the record, and having the benefit of oral argument, we find no reversible error. We have considered all of John Goodrich and Jerald Watson's specifications of error, reviewing de novo the following:
1. Whether the district court erred in denying Watson and Goodrich qualified immunity on Robert Wright's Fourth Amendment claim?
2. Whether the district court erred in in denying Watson and Goodrich official immunity on Robert Wright's parallel state law claim?
The decision of the district court is
AFFIRMED.