Case Name: In the Matter of the Marriage of LIEUALLEN, Appellant, and LIEUALLEN, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1981-08-03
Citations: 53 Or. App. 432
Docket Number: No. 22,558, CA 18260
Parties: In the Matter of the Marriage of LIEUALLEN, Appellant, and LIEUALLEN, Respondent.
Judges: Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Thornton and Van Hoomissen, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 53
Pages: 432–432

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted May 27,
affirmed August 3, 1981
In the Matter of the Marriage of LIEUALLEN, Appellant, and LIEUALLEN, Respondent.
(No. 22,558, CA 18260)
631 P2d 1391
Garry L. Reynolds, Hermiston, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Morrison, Reynolds & Bloom, P.C., Hermiston.
W. Eugene Hallman, Pendleton, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Mautz & Hallman, Pendleton.
Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Thornton and Van Hoomissen, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The trial court's division of the property was equitable given the duration of the marriage and the parties' contributions to it. We will not modify a property division unless we are convinced we can make a significantly preferable disposition. Frishkoff and Frischkoff, 45 Or App 1033, 610 P2d 831 (1980).
Affirmed. No costs to either party.