Case Name: Derek JARVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEDEX OFFICE & PRINT SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-10-23
Citations: 334 F. App'x 571
Docket Number: No. 09-1299
Parties: Derek JARVIS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. FEDEX OFFICE & PRINT SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 334
Pages: 571–571

Head Matter:
Derek JARVIS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. FEDEX OFFICE & PRINT SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 09-1299.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 20, 2009.
Decided: Oct. 23, 2009.
Derek Jarvis, Appellant Pro Se. David Samuel Panzer, Eric C. Rowe, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Washington, DC, for Appel-lee.
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Derek Jarvis appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jarvis v. FedEx Office & Print Serv., No. 8:08-cv-01694-DKC (D.Md. Mar. 10, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.