Case Name: Ramon AVITIA-NUNEZ, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-09-03
Citations: 75 F. App'x 597
Docket Number: No. 02-71849; INS No. A76-702-972
Parties: Ramon AVITIA-NUNEZ, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 75
Pages: 597–598

Head Matter:
Ramon AVITIA-NUNEZ, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.
No. 02-71849.
INS No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 25, 2003.
Decided Sept. 3, 2003.
James M. Byrne, Esq., Elhaam Hashemi, Byrne, Bogue & Byrne, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.
Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, San Francisco, CA, Papú Sandhu, Emily A. Rad-ford, Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before GRABER, WARDLAW, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
This case raises the same issues as Padilla v. Ashcroft, 334 F.3d 921 (9th Cir.2003). For the reasons stated in that opinion, the petition is DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.