Case Name: Booss et al. v. Mihan
Court: New York Superior Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1893
Citations: 4 Misc. 614
Docket Number: 
Parties: Booss et al. v. Mihan.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 4
Pages: 614–614

Head Matter:
Booss et al. v. Mihan.
Appeal by plaintiffs from an order vacating an order theretofore obtained by them by default referring the issues to a referee to hear and determine the same.
Henry Grasse, for plaintiffs (appellants).
Stephen O. Baldwin, for defendant (respondent).

Opinion:
Fbeedmaet, J.
Upon their complaint the plaintiffs seek to recover from the defendant the amount of certain over payments made by the plaintiffs to the defendant on account of labor and services rendered, and obtained by the defendant by means of deceit and false and fraudulent representations. The cause of action thus set forth is not referable, and that being so the defendant's answer cannot make -it referable. Moreover, the reply shows that the counterclaim set up in the answer does not involve the examination of a long account.
The order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Geigebioh, J., concurs.
Order affirmed, with costs.