Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cedric O'Neal BUTLER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-05-27
Citations: 380 F. App'x 312
Docket Number: No. 10-6169
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cedric O’Neal BUTLER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 380
Pages: 312–312

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cedric O’Neal BUTLER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-6169.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 20, 2010.
Decided: May 27, 2010.
Cedric O’Neal Butler, Appellant Pro Se. Stanley Duane Ragsdale, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Cedric O'Neal Butler appeals the district court's order denying his motion to compel the Government to file a Fed. R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion on his behalf. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Butler, No. 1:05-cr-01220-MBS-1 (D.S.C. Jan. 13, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.