Case Name: INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA (UAW); James Ward; Marshall Hunt; Richard Gordon, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. KELSEY-HAYES COMPANY; TRW Automotive Holdings Corporation; Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation, Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-09-22
Citations: 872 F.3d 388
Docket Number: No. 15-2285
Parties: INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA (UAW); James Ward; Marshall Hunt; Richard Gordon, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. KELSEY-HAYES COMPANY; TRW Automotive Holdings Corporation; Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation, Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: Béfore: GILMAN, GIBBONS, and STRANCH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 872
Pages: 388–393

Head Matter:
INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA (UAW); James Ward; Marshall Hunt; Richard Gordon, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. KELSEY-HAYES COMPANY; TRW Automotive Holdings Corporation; Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 15-2285
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Decided and Filed: September 22, 2017
ARGUED: Gregory V. Mersol, BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellants. William Wertheimer, LAW OFFICE OF WILLIAM WERTHEIMER, Bingham Farms, Michigan, for Appel-lees. ON BRIEF: Gregory ,V. Mersol, BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellants. William Wer-theimer, LAW OFFICE OF WILLIAM WERTHEIMER, Bingham Farms, Michigan, Stuart M. Israel, John G. Adam, LEGGHIO & ISRAEL, P.C., Royal Oak, Michigan, for Appellees.
Béfore: GILMAN, GIBBONS, and STRANCH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
GIBBONS, J.
(pp. 388-89), delivered a concurrence to the denial of rehearing en
banc. SUTTON, J. (pg. 389-90), delivered a concurrence to the denial of rehearing en banc. GRIFFIN, J. (pp. 390-93), delivered a dissent to the denial of rehearing en banc, in which GILMAN, J., joined.
ORDER
The court received a petition for rehearing en banc. The original panel has reviewed the petition for rehearing and concludes that the issues raised in the petition were fully considered upon the original submission and decision on the cases. The petition then was circulated to the full court. Less than a majority of the judges voted in favor of rehearing en bane.
Therefore, the petition is denied. Judge Gilman would grant rehearing for the reasons stated in his dissent,' and also joins Judge Griffin's dissent.
. Judge White recused herself from participation in this ruling.