Case Name: William L. CHANDLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. B.J. ROBERTS, Sheriff, Defendant-Appellee, and George M. Rogers, III, Attorney at Law; Anthon Bell, Commonwealth Attorney, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-05-29
Citations: 573 F. App'x 286
Docket Number: No. 14-6138
Parties: William L. CHANDLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. B.J. ROBERTS, Sheriff, Defendant-Appellee, and George M. Rogers, III, Attorney at Law; Anthon Bell, Commonwealth Attorney, Defendants.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 573
Pages: 286–287

Head Matter:
William L. CHANDLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. B.J. ROBERTS, Sheriff, Defendant-Appellee, and George M. Rogers, III, Attorney at Law; Anthon Bell, Commonwealth Attorney, Defendants.
No. 14-6138.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 22, 2014.
Decided: May 29, 2014.
William L. Chandler, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Lawrence Dumville, Norris & St. Clair P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
William L. Chandler appeals the district court's orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2012), and he has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Chandler's motion to proceed in for-ma pauperis, we affirm the district court's orders. Chandler v. Roberts, No. 1:13-cv-01115-GBL-IDD (E.D. Va. Oct. 28, 2013; Dec. 19, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.