Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Teddy Leroy BAILEY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-05-02
Citations: 223 F. App'x 807
Docket Number: No. 06-6356
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Teddy Leroy BAILEY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 223
Pages: 807–807

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Teddy Leroy BAILEY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-6356.
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
May 2, 2007.
Jay Farber, Office of the United States Attorney, Oklahoma City, OK, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Teddy Leroy Bailey, Texarkana, TX, pro se.
Before BRISCOE, McKAY, and McCONNELL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER AND JUDGMENT
MICHAEL W. McCONNELL, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Teddy Leroy Bailey filed what he styled an "Independent Bill In Equity For Relief from Judgment and Action In Aequitas Et In Personam" challenging his previously imposed sentence. The United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma correctly dismissed this action for want of jurisdiction. That judgment is AFFIRMED. Appellant's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). This case is therefore submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R.App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.