Case Name: Patrick CHERISMA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2001-08-01
Citations: 789 So. 2d 1247
Docket Number: No. 4D00-400
Parties: Patrick CHERISMA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: POLEN, C.J., STONE and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 789
Pages: 1247–1247

Head Matter:
Patrick CHERISMA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D00-400.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Aug. 1, 2001.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Karen E. Ehrlich, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melynda L. Melear, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court's order revoking appellant's probation. The evidence presented at the hearing supports the finding that appellant violated his probation by setting up the armed robbery of his employer. The trial court erred in finding appellant guilty of Count II of the amended violation probation affidavit, since no evidence was presented concerning that armed robbery. Nonetheless, the other armed robbery violation is more than substantial enough to warrant revocation, so we do not remand the case for reconsideration by the trial court. See Kiess v. State, 642 So.2d 1141, 1142 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).
POLEN, C.J., STONE and GROSS, JJ., concur.