Case Name: Ricky MURKS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-12-26
Citations: 52 F. App'x 821
Docket Number: No. 01-5688
Parties: Ricky MURKS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before BATCHELDER and MOORE, Circuit Judges; and FORESTER, Chief District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 52
Pages: 821–822

Head Matter:
Ricky MURKS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 01-5688.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Dec. 26, 2002.
Before BATCHELDER and MOORE, Circuit Judges; and FORESTER, Chief District Judge.
The Honorable Karl S. Forester, United States Chief District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
ORDER
Pro se federal prisoner Ricky Murks appeals a district court judgment that denied his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The parties have expressly waived oral argument pursuant to Rule 34(j)(3), Rules of the Sixth Circuit, and we agree that oral argument is not necessary. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
We affirm the district court's judgment. Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), may not be applied retroactively in an initial § 2255 motion. Goode v. United States, 305 F.3d 378, - slip op. at 5 (6th Cir.2002).