Case Name: Carla Louise LYONS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Nancy BERRYHILL, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-06-30
Citations: 692 F. App'x 880
Docket Number: No. 15-17322
Parties: Carla Louise LYONS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Nancy BERRYHILL, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before: SCHROEDER and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges, and PIERSOL, District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 692
Pages: 880–881

Head Matter:
Carla Louise LYONS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Nancy BERRYHILL, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 15-17322
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted on the Briefs June 12, 2017 San Francisco, California
Filed June 30, 2017
Mark Ross Caldwell, Mark Caldwell, P.C., Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellant
Jordan Dylan Goddard, Esquire, Assistant Regional Counsel, Michael Reid Tun-ick, Assistant Regional Counsel, SSA—Social Security Administration, Office of the General Counsel, Seattle, WA, for Defendant-Appellee
Before: SCHROEDER and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges, and PIERSOL, District Judge.
This panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument, See Fed. R, App, P. 34(a)(2).
The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Carla Lyons ("Lyons") appeals from the district court's decision remanding for further proceedings in Lyons' action for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. We review the district court's decision to remand for further proceedings for abuse of discretion, Treichler v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin., 775 F.3d 1090, 1098 (9th Cir. 2014), and we affirm.
The Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") denied Lyons disability insurance benefits upon concluding, at step two of the five-step sequential evaluation process, that Lyons' impairments were non-severe. The ALJ did not develop the record regarding steps three, four, and five. Given the lack of analysis beyond step two, we affirm the district court's decision to remand to the ALJ for further administrative proceedings.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.