Case Name: LING JIANG, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-11-28
Citations: 302 F. App'x 534
Docket Number: No. 05-77291
Parties: LING JIANG, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 302
Pages: 534–534

Head Matter:
LING JIANG, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 05-77291.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 24, 2008.
Filed Nov. 28, 2008.
Claire H. Kim, Esq., Law Offices of Claire H. Kim, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.
Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, San Francisco, CA, Barry J. Pettinato, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Ling Jiang, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings conducted in absentia. We dismiss the petition for review.
The petition for review is not timely as to the BIA order addressing ineffective assistance of counsel, so we lack jurisdiction over Jiang's ineffective assistance claims. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1258 (9th Cir.1996). Because we cannot consider Jiang's only challenge to the BIA's dispositive finding that her motion was numerically barred, we need not consider her remaining contentions.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.