Case Name: Lennell HOLLOMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Judge BROWN, Judge, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-09-24
Citations: 332 F. App'x 887
Docket Number: No. 09-6510
Parties: Lennell HOLLOMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Judge BROWN, Judge, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 332
Pages: 887–888

Head Matter:
Lennell HOLLOMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Judge BROWN, Judge, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 09-6510.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 26, 2009.
Decided: Sept. 24, 2009.
Lennell Holloman, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Lennell Holloman appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Holloman v. Brown, No. 2:09-cv-00020-RBS-TEM (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 21, 2009; entered Jan. 22, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.