Case Name: James Nares, Respondent, et al., Plaintiff, v. M & W Waterproofing et al., Appellants
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2004-09-21
Citations: 3 N.Y.3d 698
Docket Number: 
Parties: James Nares, Respondent, et al., Plaintiff, v M & W Waterproofing et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 3
Pages: 698–699

Head Matter:
James Nares, Respondent, et al., Plaintiff, v M & W Waterproofing et al., Appellants.
Submitted July 6, 2004;
decided September 21, 2004

Opinion:
Motion by NTJ Associates for leave to appeal from the March 9, 2004 Appellate Division order dismissed upon the ground that the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution (see Whitfield v City of New York, 90 NY2d 777, 780-781 [1997]). Motion by M & W Waterproofing for leave to appeal from the April 8, 2004 amended judgment of Supreme Court dismissed as untimely (see Whitfield v City of New York, 90 NY2d 777, 781 [1997]).