Case Name: Steven BEASLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2006-05-04
Citations: 927 So. 2d 1026
Docket Number: No. 1D04-3220
Parties: Steven BEASLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: KAHN, C.J., WOLF, and BENTON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 927
Pages: 1026–1027

Head Matter:
Steven BEASLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D04-3220.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
May 4, 2006.
George F. Schaefer, Esquire of the Law Office of George F. Schaefer, San Diego, CA, for Appellant.
Charlie Crist, Attorney General; Bryan Jordan, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See King v. State, 628 So.2d 486, 488 (Fla.1993); Taylor v. State, 640 So.2d 1127, 1133 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) ("Improper prosecutorial comment is subject to a harmless error analysis, and will give rise to reversal of a conviction only if the comment is so prejudicial that it vitiates the entire trial."). See also Proctor v. State, 901 So.2d 994, 995 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) ("[Tjhis court would not be able to address the [scrivener's] errors because, absent the trial court's ruling on a rule 3.800(b)(2) motion, these errors were not preserved. See Brannon v. State, 850 So.2d 452, 456 (Fla.2003).").
KAHN, C.J., WOLF, and BENTON, JJ., concur.