Case Name: Earl D. SHOBE, Appellant, v. STATE Of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2011-12-20
Citations: 354 S.W.3d 672
Docket Number: No. ED 96181
Parties: Earl D. SHOBE, Appellant, v. STATE Of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 354
Pages: 672–672

Head Matter:
Earl D. SHOBE, Appellant, v. STATE Of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 96181.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Dec. 20, 2011.
Craig A. Johnston, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Daniel N. McPherson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Earl D. Shobe appeals the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the parties' briefs and the record on appeal. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no prec-edential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2).