Case Name: STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Gerald M. TROTTER, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-06-28
Citations: 677 So. 2d 35
Docket Number: No. 95-2559
Parties: STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Gerald M. TROTTER, Appellee.
Judges: DAUKSCH and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 677
Pages: 35–35

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Gerald M. TROTTER, Appellee.
No. 95-2559.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
June 28, 1996.
Rehearing Denied July 30, 1996.
Barry Richard of Greenberg, Traurig, Hoffman, Lipoff, Rosen & Quentel, Tallahassee, for Appellant State of Florida and Ami-cus Curiae, The Florida Bar.
William G. Dayton, Dade City, for Appel-lee.

Opinion:
GOSHORN, Judge.
Pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(b)(4)(A), we accept the following certified question from the county court as one of great public importance:
WHETHER SECTION 454.23, FLORIDA STATUTES (1995) IS VOID AS BEING UNCONSTITUTIONALLY VAGUE?
In answering this question in the negative, we align ourselves with the First District Court of Appeal and adopt the reasoning of Judge Mickle's scholarly opinion in State v. Foster, — So.2d -, 21 Fla. L. Weekly D533 (Fla. 1st DCA Feb. 28,1996).
REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.
DAUKSCH and HARRIS, JJ., concur.