Case Name: John PHILLIPS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-01-27
Citations: 311 F. App'x 14
Docket Number: No. 08-16498
Parties: John PHILLIPS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: O’SCANNLAIN, SILVERMAN and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 311
Pages: 14–14

Head Matter:
John PHILLIPS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 08-16498.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 20, 2009.
Filed Jan. 27, 2009.
John Phillips, Oakland, CA, pro se.
Rachel Wagner, Esquire, Office of The City Attorney, Oakland, CA, Michael T. Pyle, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Francisco, CA, Jill T. Bowers, Esquire, AGCA— Office of The California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Defendants-Appel-lees.
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, SILVERMAN and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Upon review of the record and appellant's response to this court's order to show cause, this court hereby summarily affirms the district court's final judgment. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (summary affir-manee appropriate where result is clear from face of record).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.