Case Name: LOUISE LANGE, Respondent v. THE MANHATTAN RAILWAY COMPANY, et al., Appellants
Court: New York Superior Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1892-07-05
Citations: 29 Jones & S. 455
Docket Number: 
Parties: LOUISE LANGE, Respondent v. THE MANHATTAN RAILWAY COMPANY, et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Reports of cases argued and determined in the Superior Court of the city of New York
Volume: 61
Pages: 455–456

Head Matter:
LOUISE LANGE, Respondent v. THE MANHATTAN RAILWAY COMPANY, et al., Appellants.
Trial—Defendants should not be allowed to prove their defence on the cross-examination of plaintiff before plaintiff rests.
Before Dugro and Gildersleeve, JJ.
Decided July 5, 1892.
Appeal by defendants from judgment entered upon verdict in plaintiff’s favor and from an order denying motion for a new trial. The action was brought to recover damages to the use of plaintiff’s premises caused by the maintenance and operation of defendants’ elevated railroad in sixth avenue in front thereof.
Davies, Short & Townsend, for appellants.
Byram L. Winters, attorney, and Edward S. Clinch of counsel, for respondent.

Opinion:
The Court (Dugro, J., writing, Gildersleeve, J., concurring)
affirmed the judgment and order, with costs.