Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Courtney Markee GILMORE, a/k/a Dust, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-10-20
Citations: 620 F. App'x 193
Docket Number: No. 15-7279
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Courtney Markee GILMORE, a/k/a Dust, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 620
Pages: 193–193

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Courtney Markee GILMORE, a/k/a Dust, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-7279.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 15, 2015.
Decided: Oct. 20, 2015.
Courtney Markee Gilmore, Appellant Pro Se. Stacey Denise Haynes, Stanley D. Ragsdale, Assistant United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appel-lee.
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Courtney Markee Gilmore appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under Guidelines Amendment 782. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Gilmore, No. 3:09-cr-00501-JFA-6 (D.S.C. July 29, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED,