Case Name: Frank A. TESTA, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE o/b/o Laura TESTA, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2016-03-02
Citations: 186 So. 3d 614
Docket Number: No. 4D15-1988
Parties: Frank A. TESTA, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE o/b/o Laura TESTA, Appellee.
Judges: TAYLOR, DAMOORGIAN and GERBER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 186
Pages: 614–615

Head Matter:
Frank A. TESTA, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE o/b/o Laura TESTA, Appellee.
No. 4D15-1988.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
March 2, 2016.
Frank A. Testa, Fort Lauderdale, pro se.
Pamela Jo .Bondi, Attorney General, and William H. Branch, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We. affirm without discussion the circuit court's orders: (1) granting the Department of Revenue's motion for civil contempt against the father; and (2) denying the father's motion to vacate the contempt order and motion for rehearing. The father's argument that the circuit court erred in entering an order barring him from further pro se filing already was addressed in our case no. . 4D15-1914, in which the father petitioned, for a writ of certiorari. We granted the father's petition and quashed the order, with directions to issue an order to show cause and afford the father a réasonable time to' respond before determining whether the sanction is appropriate. Testa v. Testa, 171 So.3d 244, 244-45 (Fla. 4th -DCA 2015).
Affirmed.
TAYLOR, DAMOORGIAN and GERBER, JJ., concur.