Case Name: Edella JOHNSON (a/k/a Edella Robinson a/k/a Edella Robinson Johnson), Eric Johnson, Individually and on Behalf of other Similarly Situated Former and Current Homeowners in Pennsylvania, Petitioners v. PHELAN HALLINAN & SCHMIEG, LLP, Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2019-05-30
Citations: 212 A.3d 499
Docket Number: No. 11 WAL 2019
Parties: Edella JOHNSON (a/k/a Edella Robinson a/k/a Edella Robinson Johnson), Eric Johnson, Individually and on Behalf of other Similarly Situated Former and Current Homeowners in Pennsylvania, Petitioners
v.
PHELAN HALLINAN & SCHMIEG, LLP, Respondents
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 212
Pages: 499–499

Head Matter:
Edella JOHNSON (a/k/a Edella Robinson a/k/a Edella Robinson Johnson), Eric Johnson, Individually and on Behalf of other Similarly Situated Former and Current Homeowners in Pennsylvania, Petitioners
v.
PHELAN HALLINAN & SCHMIEG, LLP, Respondents
No. 11 WAL 2019
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
May 30, 2019
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 30th day of May, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED to the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity is:
Did the Superior Court err in determining the mortgage at issue was not a "residential mortgage" and that petitioners are therefore not entitled to seek damages pursuant to 41 P.S. § 406 and 502?