Case Name: Cornelius R. WOODS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Steven HILL; Ralph Wylie; Doyle Cox; Curtis E. Smith; Sherman Smith; Gary Pegram; Shaundra Patterson; Beverly McClain; Donald Petrisko; William Myles; Luther Hill; Robert Hill; Dennis Hawkins; Kevin Kiddy; Todd Hill; Does 1-20, inclusively; Joseph Brooks, Defendants-Appellees, v. United States of America, Movant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-10-06
Citations: 151 F. App'x 235
Docket Number: No. 05-6656
Parties: Cornelius R. WOODS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Steven HILL; Ralph Wylie; Doyle Cox; Curtis E. Smith; Sherman Smith; Gary Pegram; Shaundra Patterson; Beverly McClain; Donald Petrisko; William Myles; Luther Hill; Robert Hill; Dennis Hawkins; Kevin Kiddy; Todd Hill; Does 1-20, inclusively; Joseph Brooks, Defendants—Appellees, v. United States of America, Movant—Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 151
Pages: 235–236

Head Matter:
Cornelius R. WOODS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Steven HILL; Ralph Wylie; Doyle Cox; Curtis E. Smith; Sherman Smith; Gary Pegram; Shaundra Patterson; Beverly McClain; Donald Petrisko; William Myles; Luther Hill; Robert Hill; Dennis Hawkins; Kevin Kiddy; Todd Hill; Does 1-20, inclusively; Joseph Brooks, Defendants—Appellees, v. United States of America, Movant—Appellee.
No. 05-6656.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 29, 2005.
Decided Oct. 6, 2005.
Cornelius R. Woods, Appellant Pro Se. Debra Jean Prillaman, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 86(c).
PER CURIAM:
Cornelius R. Woods seeks to appeal the magistrate judge's order denying without prejudice Woods' motion for appointment of counsel in this Bivens action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Woods seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971).