Case Name: Maxi Dinga SOPO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Ice Field Office Director, Atlanta Region, Stewart DC Warden, Respondents-Appellees.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-05-17
Citations: 890 F.3d 952
Docket Number: No. 14-11421
Parties: Maxi Dinga SOPO, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Ice Field Office Director, Atlanta Region, Stewart DC Warden, Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: Before: JILL PRYOR and HULL, Circuit Judges, and CONWAY, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 890
Pages: 952–954

Head Matter:
Maxi Dinga SOPO, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Ice Field Office Director, Atlanta Region, Stewart DC Warden, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 14-11421
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
May 17, 2018
David Charles Frederick, Joshua D. Branson, Kellogg Hansen Todd Figel & Frederick, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Petitioner-Appellant.
Hans Harris Chen, J. Max Weintraub, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Jeffrey S. Robins, U.S. Department of Justice, OIL-District Court Section, Washington, DC, Michael J. Moore, U.S. Attorney, Pope McGlamry Kilpatrick Morrison & Norwood, PC, Atlanta, GA, Sheetul S. Wall, U.S. Attorney's Office, Columbus, GA, for Respondent-Appellee U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL.
Jeffrey S. Robins, U.S. Department of Justice, OIL-District Court Section, Washington, DC, Michael J. Moore, U.S. Attorney, Pope McGlamry Kilpatrick Morrison & Norwood, PC, Atlanta, GA, Sheetul S. Wall, U.S. Attorney's Office, Columbus, GA, for Respondents-Appellees SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ICE FIELD OFFICE DIRECTOR, ATLANTA REGION, STEWART DC WARDEN.
Michael K.T. Tan, Judy Rabinovitz, ACLU Foundation, New York, NY, for Amicus Curiae AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION.
Eunice Hyunhye Cho, Southern Poverty Law Center, Atlanta, GA, Rebecca Sharpless, University of Miami School of Law, Coral Gables, FL, Michael S. Vastine, St. Thomas University School of Law, Miami Gardens, FL, for Amicus Curiae ALABAMA COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT JUSTICE.
Rebecca Sharpless, University of Miami School of Law, Coral Gables, FL, for Amicus Curiae 31 SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCHERS AND PROFESSORS, ET AL.
Before: JILL PRYOR and HULL, Circuit Judges, and CONWAY, District Judge.
Honorable Anne C. Conway, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Florida, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
BY THE COURT:
On June 15, 2016, this Court published a decision vacating the district court's March 4, 2014, order dismissing Appellant's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for habeas corpus and remanded. Sopo v. U.S. Att'y Gen., 825 F.3d 1199 (11th Cir. 2016). On August 8, 2016, Appellees' filed a petition for panel rehearing, which we stayed pending the Supreme Court's decision in Jennings v. Rodriguez, - U.S. -, 138 S.Ct. 830, 200 L.Ed.2d 122 (2018), which issued on February 27, 2018. Following the issuance of Rodriguez, we directed the parties to file supplemental briefing addressing that decision's impact on this case. Those briefs have not been filed yet.
Instead, the Appellees' filed a motion to dismiss this appeal as moot and vacate this Court's above June 15, 2016 published decision. Appellees assert that Sopo was removed from the United States on January 24, 2018 and is no longer detained in immigration custody. As such, Appellees assert that Sopo's challenge to his immigration detention is now moot and request that we dismiss this appeal as moot and vacate our June 15, 2016 decision.
In a response to the Appellees' motion, Appellant notes that he received a bond hearing shortly after our June 15, 2016 published decision and confirms that he was removed from the United States in January 2018. Appellant further "agrees that his appeal in this case has become moot," and states that he "does not oppose vacatur of the panel's decision."
Appellees' motion to dismiss this appeal as moot is GRANTED. Our June 15, 2016, published decision is hereby VACATED, and the appeal is DISMISSED AS MOOT.