Case Name: Odraye G. JONES, nka Malik Allah-U-Akbar, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Margaret BRADSHAW, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-01-28
Citations: 591 F. App'x 508
Docket Number: No. 07-3766
Parties: Odraye G. JONES, nka Malik Allah-U-Akbar, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Margaret BRADSHAW, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before: COLE, Chief Judge; MOORE and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 591
Pages: 508–508

Head Matter:
Odraye G. JONES, nka Malik Allah-U-Akbar, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Margaret BRADSHAW, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 07-3766.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Jan. 28, 2015.
Before: COLE, Chief Judge; MOORE and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
Odraye G. Jones, an Ohio death row inmate, moves this court to expand its January 30, 2009 order in this capital ha-beas appeal to allow: (1) the district court to consider Jones's pro se motions to remove counsel and waive his lethal injection litigation; and (2) the filing and full consideration of further pleadings to demonstrate cause to excuse the procedural default of various, ineffective assistance of trial counsel claims under Martinez v. Ryan, — U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 1309, 182 L.Ed.2d 272 (2012), and Trevino v. Thaler, — U.S. —, 133 S.Ct. 1911, 185 L.Ed.2d 1044 (2013).
The warden does not oppose Jones's first motion, and we granted a similar motion on September 6, 2012. We now grant this motion as well.
The warden opposes Jones's second motion, filed through counsel, in which he seeks to supplement or amend his pleadings with claims related to the ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Jones contends that there is cause to excuse the procedural default of those claims under the authority of Martinez and Trevino. Our court has not yet decided whether an Ohio habe-as petitioner can show cause to excuse a procedural default under Trevino. See McGuire v. Warden, Chillicothe Corr. Inst., 738 F.3d 741, 751-52 (6th Cir.2013). We therefore grant Jones's second motion to expand the limited remand to allow the filing and full consideration of supplemental or amended pleadings related to the ineffective assistance of trial counsel, and for the district court to consider Jones's contention that there is cause to excuse the procedural default of those claims under Martinez and Trevino.