Case Name: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Daniel Clarence FRY, Petitioner
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2001-07-25
Citations: 778 A.2d 623
Docket Number: 
Parties: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Daniel Clarence FRY, Petitioner.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 778
Pages: 623–624

Head Matter:
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Daniel Clarence FRY, Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
July 25, 2001.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
AND NOW, this 25th day of July, 2001, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, the order of the Superior Court is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for consideration on the merits. See Union Electric Corp. v. Bd. of Property Assessment, 560 Pa. 481, 746 A.2d 581 (2000) (allowing a nunc pro tunc appeal where the failure to comply with the timeliness requirement was caused by an administrative body's misstatement of the deadline for filing an appeal); Commonwealth v. Coolbaugh, 770 A.2d 788 (Pa.Super.2001) (allowing an untimely appeal from the revocation of probation where the trial court misinformed the defendant of the appeal filing deadline).