Case Name: The State of Ohio, Appellant, v. Jacot, Appellee
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1995-02-15
Citations: 71 Ohio St. 3d 1217
Docket Number: No. 93-1182
Parties: The State of Ohio, Appellant, v. Jacot, Appellee.
Judges: Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Petree, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 71
Pages: 1217–1217

Head Matter:
The State of Ohio, Appellant, v. Jacot, Appellee.
[Cite as State v. Jacot (1995), 71 Ohio St.3d 1217.]
(No. 93-1182
Submitted January 10, 1995
Decided February 15, 1995.)
Keith A. Shearer, Wayne County Prosecuting Attorney, and Daniel R. Lutz, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.
Eberhart & Buytendyk Co., L.P.A., and Michael G. Buytendyk, for appellee.
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, Richard A. Cordray, State Solicitor, and Simon B. Karas, Deputy Chief Counsel, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Attorney General.

Opinion:
This cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.
Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Petree, JJ., concur.
Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, J., dissent and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.
Charles R. Petree, J., of the Tenth Appellate District, sitting for Cook, J.