Case Name: Rickey R. LLOYD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW HANOVER COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT; Lieutenant Murphy; Sidney A. Causey; Chief Parker, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-11-06
Citations: 204 F. App'x 223
Docket Number: No. 06-6994
Parties: Rickey R. LLOYD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW HANOVER COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT; Lieutenant Murphy; Sidney A. Causey; Chief Parker, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 204
Pages: 223–224

Head Matter:
Rickey R. LLOYD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW HANOVER COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT; Lieutenant Murphy; Sidney A. Causey; Chief Parker, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 06-6994.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 31, 2006.
Decided: Nov. 6, 2006.
Rickey R. Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Rickey R. Lloyd appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lloyd v. New Hanover County Sheriff Dep't, No. 5:06-ct-03033-H (E.D.N.C. May 16, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.