Case Name: FISHER v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1911-03-08
Citations: 135 S.W. 564
Docket Number: 
Parties: FISHER v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 135
Pages: 564–565

Head Matter:
FISHER v. STATE.
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
March 8, 1911.)
Criminal Law (§ 1144 ) — Appeal—Review— Presumptions.
In the absence of a statement of facts on appeal, the presumption is that the court charged the law applicable to the facts produced in evidence.
[Ed. Note. — Eor other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 3016-3037; Dec. Dig. § 1144. ]
Appeal from District Court, Hunt County; R. L. Porter, Judge.
Johnnie Eisher was convicted of passing a forged instrument, and appeals.
Affirmed.
C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
For other cases see same topic and section NUMBER in Dec. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key No. Series & Kep’r Indexes

Opinion:
HARPER, J.
Appellant was tried and convicted at the October term of the district court of Hunt county, being charged with passing a forged instrument.
There is neither a statement of facts nor bills of exception in the record. The indictment charges the defendant with passing a forged instrument. The charge submits this offense to the jury. In the absence of a statement of facts, the presumption is that the court charged the law applicable to the facts introduced in evidence.
The judgment is affirmed.