Case Name: Janet Louise WARREN, individually and as natural parent and guardian of Dana Carlotta Warren and Issac Russell Warren, minors, Appellant, v. SHANDS TEACHING HOSPITAL AND CLINICS, INC.; d/b/a Shands Hospital at the University of Florida; Board of Regents, State of Florida d/b/a University of Florida College of Medicine, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1997-10-21
Citations: 700 So. 2d 444
Docket Number: No. 96-2762
Parties: Janet Louise WARREN, individually and as natural parent and guardian of Dana Carlotta Warren and Issac Russell Warren, minors, Appellant, v. SHANDS TEACHING HOSPITAL AND CLINICS, INC.; d/b/a Shands Hospital at the University of Florida; Board of Regents, State of Florida d/b/a University of Florida College of Medicine, Appellees.
Judges: BOOTH, JOANOS and WOLF, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 700
Pages: 444–444

Head Matter:
Janet Louise WARREN, individually and as natural parent and guardian of Dana Carlotta Warren and Issac Russell Warren, minors, Appellant, v. SHANDS TEACHING HOSPITAL AND CLINICS, INC.; d/b/a Shands Hospital at the University of Florida; Board of Regents, State of Florida d/b/a University of Florida College of Medicine, Appellees.
No. 96-2762.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Oct. 21, 1997.
Maria P. Sperando of Gary, Williams, Par-enti, Finney, Lewis, McManus, Watson & Sperando, Fort Pierce, for Appellant.
A. Russell Bobo and Thomas W. Poulton of Bobo, Spicer, Ciotoli,. Fulford, Bocchino, De-Bevoise & Le Clainche, P.A., Orlando, for Appellees.

Opinion:
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING, REHEARING EN BANC OR CERTIFICATION
PER CURIAM.
Appellees have filed a motion for rehearing, rehearing en banc, or in the alternative, for certification of conflict. We deny the motions for rehearing and rehearing en banc, but grant the motion for certification. We certify that our decision in this case, with regard to the applicability of Kozel v. Ostendorf, 629 So.2d 817 (Fla.1993), in the context of late service, is in direct conflict with the decision of the Fourth District in Stahl v. Evans, 691 So.2d 1184 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).
BOOTH, JOANOS and WOLF, JJ., concur.