Case Name: In The Matter of the Application of G. Harry JACKSON for an Order Pursuant to the United States Arbritation Act of February 12, 1925, 43 Stat. 886, 9 U.S.C.A. § I et seq., confirming an Arbitration Award under a Contract originally between Smith & Bird, Assignor of G. Harry Jackson, and Kentucky River Mills, Inc. G. Harry JACKSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. KENTUCKY RIVER MILLS, Inc., Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1948-11-24
Citations: 170 F.2d 703
Docket Number: No. 77, Docket 21108
Parties: In The Matter of the Application of G. Harry JACKSON for an Order Pursuant to the United States Arbritation Act of February 12, 1925, 43 Stat. 886, 9 U.S.C.A. § I et seq., confirming an Arbitration Award under a Contract originally between Smith & Bird, Assignor of G. Harry Jackson, and Kentucky River Mills, Inc. G. Harry JACKSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. KENTUCKY RIVER MILLS, Inc., Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 170
Pages: 703–703

Head Matter:
In The Matter of the Application of G. Harry JACKSON for an Order Pursuant to the United States Arbritation Act of February 12, 1925, 43 Stat. 886, 9 U.S.C.A. § I et seq., confirming an Arbitration Award under a Contract originally between Smith & Bird, Assignor of G. Harry Jackson, and Kentucky River Mills, Inc. G. Harry JACKSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. KENTUCKY RIVER MILLS, Inc., Respondent-Appellee.
No. 77, Docket 21108.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Nov. 24, 1948.
Emmet, Marvin & Martin, of New York City (George W. Martin, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
White & Case, of New York City (Orison S. Marden and Edgar E. Barton, of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.
Before SWAN, CHASE, and FRANK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Order affirmed on the opinion below, 77 F.Supp. 53.