Case Name: BAUMAN et al, Petitioners on Review, v. GITTELSOHN et al, Respondents on Review
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1984-03-27
Citations: 296 Or. 663
Docket Number: TC CC-82-329; CA A28899; SC S30134
Parties: BAUMAN et al, Petitioners on Review, v. GITTELSOHN et al, Respondents on Review.
Judges: PER CURIAM
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 296
Pages: 663–665

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted March 5,
reversed and remanded March 27, 1984
BAUMAN et al, Petitioners on Review, v. GITTELSOHN et al, Respondents on Review.
(TC CC-82-329; CA A28899; SC S30134)
678 P2d 1226
J. Michael Alexander, Salem, filed petition for petitioner’s on review. With him on the petition was Burt, Swanson, Lathen, Alexander & McCann, Salem.
Jeanyse R. Snow, Astoria, argued the cause for respondents on review. With her on the brief were Jerry K. McCallister and MacDonald, McCallister & Snow, Astoria.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
The Court of Appeals dismissed petitioner's appeal because petitioner failed to serve notice of appeal upon the clerk of the trial court as required by ORS 19.023(2)(b). In McQuary v. Bel Air Convalescent Home, Inc., 296 Or 653, 678 P2d 1222 (1984), we hold that service of the notice of appeal on court reporters and clerks of trial courts, though required by ORS 19.023(2), is not "jurisdictional" under ORS 19.033(2). See also Spielman v. First Interstate Bank, 296 Or 660, 678 P2d 1226 (1984).
We therefore reverse the dismissal of the appeal and remand the case to the Court of Appeals for further proceedings.