Case Name: Nathaniel BARNES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-02-21
Citations: 167 F. App'x 957
Docket Number: No. 05-2141
Parties: Nathaniel BARNES, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 167
Pages: 957–958

Head Matter:
Nathaniel BARNES, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 05-2141.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 16, 2006.
Decided: Feb. 21, 2006.
Donald Gist, DeAndrea Gist Benjamin, Gist Law Firm, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. Vance J. Bettis, Gignilliat, Savitz & Bettis, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Nathaniel Barnes appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief in this civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Barnes v. South Carolina Dep't of Trans., No. CA-03-2296-3 (D.S.C. Sept. 16, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED