Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose PINEDA-GALLEGOS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-08-31
Citations: 344 F. App'x 363
Docket Number: No. 08-30437
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose PINEDA-GALLEGOS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: WALLACE, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 344
Pages: 363–364

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose PINEDA-GALLEGOS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-30437.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 20, 2009.
Filed Aug. 31, 2009.
Timothy Racicot, Esquire, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
John Rhodes, Esquire, Assistant Federal Public Defender, FDMT — Federal Defenders of Montana, Missoula, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: WALLACE, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Jose Pineda-Gallegos appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Pineda-Galle-gos contends that the district court erred by failing to consider that the lack of a "fast-track" program in the District of Montana creates an unwarranted sentencing disparity contrary to the requirements of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(6). Pineda-Galle-gos acknowledges that his contention is foreclosed by United States v. Gonzalez-Zotelo, 556 F.3d 736, 740-41 (9th Cir.2009), and that he raises it to preserve it for potential future review.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.