Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stephen Earl COOK, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-10-18
Citations: 203 F. App'x 152
Docket Number: No. 05-50605
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stephen Earl COOK, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: T.G. NELSON, W. FLETCHER, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 203
Pages: 152–153

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stephen Earl COOK, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-50605.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 16, 2006.
Filed Oct. 18, 2006.
Lee S. Arian, Esq., Becky S. Walker, Esq., Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Ap-pellee.
Stephen Earl Cook, Los Angeles, CA, pro se.
Before: T.G. NELSON, W. FLETCHER, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Stephen Earl Cook appeals from the district court's order revoking his super vised release and imposing a one-year term of imprisonment.
Cook's counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating that she finds no meritorious issues for review.
When Cook completed his sentence upon revocation of supervised release, there ceased to be a case or controversy. See United States v. Palomba, 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir.1999). Accordingly, this appeal is moot. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 14, 118 S.Ct. 978, 140 L.Ed.2d 43 (1998); Palomba, 182 F.3d at 1123 & n. 3.
We GRANT counsel's motion to withdraw.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.