Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ruel BROWN, a.k.a. King David, a.k.a. KD, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-04-02
Citations: 559 F. App'x 971
Docket Number: No. 13-11891
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ruel BROWN, a.k.a. King David, a.k.a. KD, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before PRYOR, MARTIN and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 559
Pages: 971–972

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ruel BROWN, a.k.a. King David, a.k.a. KD, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-11891
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
April 2, 2014.
Peggy Morris Ronca, Daniel C. Irick, Orlando, FL, I. Randall Gold, Robert E. O’Neill, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Angela B. Wright, Law Offices of Angela B. Wright, PA, Tampa, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before PRYOR, MARTIN and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Angela Wright, appointed counsel for Ruel Brown in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Brown's convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.