Case Name: Commonwealth v. DelMarmol, Appellant; Commonwealth v. Scanlon, Appellant
Court: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1969-11-13
Citations: 215 Pa. Super. 484
Docket Number: Appeals, Nos. 689 and 741
Parties: Commonwealth v. DelMarmol, Appellant. Commonwealth v. Scanlon, Appellant.
Judges: Before Wright, P.J., Watkins, Montgomery, Jacobs, Hoeeman, Spaulding, and Cercone, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania Superior Court Reports
Volume: 215
Pages: 484–487

Head Matter:
Commonwealth v. DelMarmol, Appellant. Commonwealth v. Scanlon, Appellant.
Argued September 15, 1969.
Before Wright, P.J., Watkins, Montgomery, Jacobs, Hoeeman, Spaulding, and Cercone, JJ.
Edward E. Kane, with him Bean, DeAngelis, Tredinnich & Giangiulio, for appellant.
James P. Geoghegan, for appellant.
Richard A. Devlin, Assistant District Attorney, with him Paul W. Tressler, Assistant District Attorney, and Milton 0. Moss, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.
November 13, 1969:

Opinion:
Opinion
Per Curiam
(on each appeal),
Judgment of sentence affirmed, and the defendant is directed to appear in the court below at such time as he may be there called, and that he be by that court committed until he has complied with the sentence, or any part thereof which has not been performed at the time the appeal was made a supersedeas.