Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark Edward ROWLEY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-06-07
Citations: 651 F. App'x 968
Docket Number: No. 15-12965
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark Edward ROWLEY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 651
Pages: 968–969

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark Edward ROWLEY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-12965
Non-Argument Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Date Filed: 06/07/2016
Adam W. Overstreet, Gregory A. Bor-denkircher, Kenyen Ray Brown, Sinan Ka-layoglu, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Mobile, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Mark Edward Rowley, Montgomery, AL, Pro Se.
Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
William Hughes, appointed counsel for Mark Rowley in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and Rowley's conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.