Case Name: Mark Tulis, Appellant, v. Nyack Hospital, Respondent, et al., Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2000-04-24
Citations: 271 A.D.2d 684
Docket Number: 
Parties: Mark Tulis, Appellant, v Nyack Hospital, Respondent, et al., Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 271
Pages: 684–684

Head Matter:
Mark Tulis, Appellant, v Nyack Hospital, Respondent, et al., Defendant.
[706 NYS2d 470]

Opinion:
—In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Sherwood, J.), dated May 20, 1999, which granted the motion of the defendant Nyack Hospital to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it as time-barred.
Ordered that the order is reversed, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated insofar as asserted against the respondent.
A prior medical malpractice action had been timely commenced by Frederick Drobin against the defendants. That action was subsequently dismissed on the ground that he lacked the capacity to sue as his causes of action vested in the bankruptcy trustee. Within six months after the prior action was dismissed, the plaintiff, Mark Tulis, commenced this action in a representative capacity on behalf of Drobin's bankruptcy estate. We agree with the plaintiff that the six-month extension embodied in CPLR 205 (a) applies and, therefore, this action was erroneously dismissed as time-barred (see, Carrick v Central Gen. Hosp., 51 NY2d 242, 252; George v Mt. Sinai Hosp., 47 NY2d 170, 179; Pinto v Ancona, 262 AD2d 472). O'Brien, J. P., Altman, Friedmann, McGinity and Smith, JJ., concur.