Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James Durham, Also Known as James Duram, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2006-06-27
Citations: 30 A.D.3d 331
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Durham, Also Known as James Duram, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 30
Pages: 331–331

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Durham, Also Known as James Duram, Appellant.
[816 NYS2d 684]

Opinion:
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald A. Zweibel, J.), rendered January 27, 2004, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of attempted robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of 15 years, unanimously affirmed.
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the jury's determinations concerning credibility (see People v Gaimari, 176 NY 84, 94 [1903]).
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.
The arguments raised in defendant's pro se supplemental brief are without merit. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Gonzalez, Sweeny and McGuire, JJ.