Case Name: Joshua EPPS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2011-03-02
Citations: 55 So. 3d 710
Docket Number: No. 1D10-1263
Parties: Joshua EPPS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: KAHN and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 55
Pages: 710–711

Head Matter:
Joshua EPPS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D10-1263.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
March 2, 2011.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and David P. Gauldin, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Charlie McCoy, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
CLARK, J.
Challenging his conviction under section 790.23(l)(a), Florida Statutes, for possession of a firearm by convicted felon, the appellant contends that the statute violates his right to bear arms pursuant to the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. While acknowledging that the statute has been upheld against prior constitutional challenges in cases such as Nelson v. State, 195 So.2d 853 (Fla.1967), the appellant maintains that the statute will no longer survive scrutiny in light of more recent decisions of the United States Supreme Court in District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570, 128 S.Ct. 2783, 171 L.Ed.2d 637 (2008), and McDonald v. City of Chicago, - U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 3020, 177 L.Ed.2d 894 (2010). In those cases the Supreme Court ruled that certain enactments in other jurisdictions, which broadly precluded the general populations there from possessing handguns, violated the Second Amendment in connection with the right to keep and use firearms within the home for self-defense. But that is not the circumstance under which the appellant was convicted in the present case. Furthermore, in both Heller and McDonald the Court expressly stated that the rulings in those cases should not be viewed as casting doubt on "prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons...." Heller and McDonald thus do not undermine the Florida rulings in cases such as Nelson, with regard to the constitutionality of section 790.23(l)(a). See also Leon-Estrada v. Secretary, Dep't of Corrections, 2010 WL 3069475 (M.D.Fla. August 4, 2010). The appellant's conviction under section 790.23(l)(a) is therefore AFFIRMED.
KAHN and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.