Case Name: Mrs. Mary Borck, widow of Thomas C. PATIN, et al. v. Huey STOCKSTILL et al.
Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1975-07-08
Citations: 315 So. 2d 875
Docket Number: No. 10267
Parties: Mrs. Mary Borck, widow of Thomas C. PATIN, et al. v. Huey STOCKSTILL et al.
Judges: Before LANDRY, BLANCHE and YELVERTON, JJ., concurring.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 315
Pages: 875–875

Head Matter:
Mrs. Mary Borck, widow of Thomas C. PATIN, et al. v. Huey STOCKSTILL et al.
No. 10267.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.
July 8, 1975.
Frans J. Labranche, New Orleans, for appellants.
Duncan S. IJemp, III, Hammond, for defendant-appellee, Stockstill.
Edward B. Dufreche, Ponchatoula, for defendant-appellee, Thibodeaux.
Charles M. Cassidy, Franklinton, for defendant-appellee, Con-Plex.
Sharon P. Frazier and Robert J. Jones, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Highway Dept., Baton Rouge, for appellees.
Before LANDRY, BLANCHE and YELVERTON, JJ., concurring.

Opinion:
BLANCHE, Judge.
For the reasons set forth in our opinion in "Mrs. Mary Borck, widow of Thomas C. Patin, et al. v. Huey Stockstill, et al.," being No. 10,266, La.App., 315 So.2d 868 the granting of the peremptory exception of prescription in Suit No. 42,639 (appellate No. 10,267), in favor of the defendants Huey Stockstill, Huey Stockstill, Inc., and W. J. Thibodeaux, Jr., against the plaintiffs therein, Mrs. Mary Borck, widow of Thomas C. Patin, et al., dismissing the plaintiffs' entire suit is hereby reversed.
However, that portion of the judgment in this suit which sustained the defendants' peremptory exception of prescription regarding the trespass and damages occurring to the plaintiffs on November 25, 1971, is hereby affirmed.
All costs of this appeal are to be paid by defendants.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.