Case Name: Thomas E. WEBSTER, Appellant, v. CITY OF KEY WEST, Florida, etc., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1999-01-20
Citations: 723 So. 2d 936
Docket Number: No. 97-3308
Parties: Thomas E. WEBSTER, Appellant, v. CITY OF KEY WEST, Florida, etc., Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and JORGENSON and GERSTEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 723
Pages: 936–936

Head Matter:
Thomas E. WEBSTER, Appellant, v. CITY OF KEY WEST, Florida, etc., Appellee.
No. 97-3308
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan. 20, 1999.
Theodore W. Herzog, Key West, for appellant.
Andrea Shaye Margalli and David J. Aud-lin, Jr., Key West, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and JORGENSON and GERSTEN, JJ.

Opinion:
SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.
The appellant seeks review of an adverse final declaratory judgment entered in 1997. We do not reach the merits because the record shows that a similar order of 1991, which entirely disposed of all pending issues and specifically provided that "[sjummary [¡judgment is hereby entered as stated above," was itself a final judgment from which a timely appeal was required, but was not taken. See S.L.T. Warehouse Co. v. Webb, 304 So.2d 97 (Fla.1974); Del Castillo v. Ralor Pharmacy, Inc., 512 So.2d 315 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). Accordingly, the trial court did not have jurisdiction over the cause so as to permit the entry of the judgment purportedly under review. It is therefore vacated and the appeal is dismissed.
. The fact that the 1991 order was titled "Order Granting in Part Petition of City of Key West's Motion for Summary Judgment and Denying Respondent Webster's Motion for Summary Judgment" makes no difference. See Del Castillo, 512 So.2d at 315; Dick v. State, 153 So.2d 844 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963).