Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Aurelio MONROY-FERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-12-11
Citations: 83 F. App'x 195
Docket Number: Nos. 02-50058, 03-50105
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Aurelio MONROY-FERNANDEZ, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 83
Pages: 195–196

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Aurelio MONROY-FERNANDEZ, Defendant—Appellant.
Nos. 02-50058, 03-50105.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 8, 2003.
Decided Dec. 11, 2003.
Miriam A. Krinsky, AUSA, Tracy L. Wilkison, Esq., Ronald L. Cheng, Esq., Tracy L. Wilkison, Esq., USLA-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Kathryn A. Young, Esq., FPDCA — Federal Public Defender’s Office (Los Ange-les), Los Angeles, CA, Oswald Parada, FPD, Office of The Federal Public Defenders, Riverside, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before GOODWIN, WALLACE, and MCKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Aurelio Monroy-Fernandez appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 73-month term of imprisonment upon re-sentencing for one count of illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) with an enhancement pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2).
Monroy-Fernandez's attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396,18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and has moved to withdraw as counsel of record on the ground that she has failed to discover any grounds for relief. Monroy-Fernandez has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. We therefore GRANT counsel's motion to withdraw and AFFIRM the district court's judgment.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.