Case Name: Mark L. CLAYTON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-05-20
Citations: 105 S.W.3d 857
Docket Number: No. ED 81545
Parties: Mark L. CLAYTON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before MARY R. RUSSELL, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 105
Pages: 857–858

Head Matter:
Mark L. CLAYTON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 81545.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
May 20, 2003.
Gwenda R. Robinson, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Nicole E. Gorovsky, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before MARY R. RUSSELL, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Mark L. Clayton, appeals from the judgment denying his request for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035. Movant contends his counsel was ineffective for assuring him that he would receive only three years for first degree robbery and armed criminal action and this false assurance rendered his guilty plea involuntary.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. However, we have provided the parties with a memorandum, for their use only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).