Case Name: V.O. CROSS and Dorothy M. Cross, his wife, James V. Risher, and others, Appellants, v. TOWN OF INGLIS, Florida, a municipal corporation, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-02-15
Citations: 557 So. 2d 156
Docket Number: No. 89-1107
Parties: V.O. CROSS and Dorothy M. Cross, his wife, James V. Risher, and others, Appellants, v. TOWN OF INGLIS, Florida, a municipal corporation, Appellee.
Judges: THOMPSON, ZEHMER and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 557
Pages: 156–157

Head Matter:
V.O. CROSS and Dorothy M. Cross, his wife, James V. Risher, and others, Appellants, v. TOWN OF INGLIS, Florida, a municipal corporation, Appellee.
No. 89-1107.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Feb. 15, 1990.
George Ortiz of Perry & Ortiz, P.A., Ocala, for appellants.
Hala Mary Ayoub of Fowler, White, Gil-len, Boggs, Villareal and Banker, P.A., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The plaintiffs below timely appeal orders setting aside a default entered against the defendant Town of Inglis and dismissing appellants' amended complaint with prejudice. We affirm. No error occurred in the court's decision to set aside the default. In dismissing the amended complaint the court relied upon City of Orlando v. Orange County, 309 So.2d 16 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975), affirmed Orange County v. City of Orlando, 327 So.2d 7 (Fla.1976). The amended complaint clearly seeks to challenge or question the town's boundaries and appellants' attempts to distinguish the instant case from City of Orlando are unconvincing. Accordingly, we affirm the dismissal.
AFFIRMED.
THOMPSON, ZEHMER and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.