Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Elzbieta Malgorzata BUGAJSKA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-11-21
Citations: 155 F. App'x 296
Docket Number: No. 04-50204; D.C. No. CR-02-00344-SVW-01
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Elzbieta Malgorzata BUGAJSKA, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before WALLACE, LEAVY, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 155
Pages: 296–297

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Elzbieta Malgorzata BUGAJSKA, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 04-50204.
D.C. No. CR-02-00344-SVW-01.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 8, 2005.
Decided Nov. 21, 2005.
Andrew Cowan, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
William C. Melcher, Melcher, Melcher & Melcher, Woodland Hills, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before WALLACE, LEAVY, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Elzbieta Malgorzata Bugajska appeals the 121-month sentence imposed after her guilty-plea conviction to wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343; mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341; impersonation of a United States judge, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 912, 2; unlawful transfer of identification documents, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028(a)(2); use of a false passport, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1542; possession of false naturalization documents, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1426(c); and possession of false immigration documents, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1546(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
We remand the sentence for further proceedings consistent with United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084 (9th Cir. 2005) (en banc).
REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.