Case Name: In the Matter of Raymond B.
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1973-08-27
Citations: 42 A.D.2d 842
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Raymond B.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 42
Pages: 842–842

Head Matter:
(August 27, 1973)
In the Matter of Raymond B.

Opinion:
Motion (1) for leave to appeal from two orders, Family Court, of the State of New York, Bronx County, entered on August 3 and August 7, 1973, denying dismissal of the petition for insufficiency and for failure to establish reasonable cause, and (2) for a stay of proceedings and parole of the respondent, denied. The interim relief affixed to the notice of motion is vacated and respondent is remanded to the custody of the Family Court, Bronx County. Although the evidence developed at the hearing of August 7, 1973, leaves much to be desired, it suffices — but barely — to hold respondent until September 20, 1973. On that date a fact-finding proceeding will be held. People ex rel. Guggenheim v. Mueci (32 N Y 2d 307) authorizes the use of hearsay evidence in establishing probable cause to hold the juvenile pending fact-finding. Here, the uncontested fact that a murder occurred supplements the hearsay. The procedure mandated by sections 747 and 748 of the Family Court Act has been observed; the evidence below complied with the guidelines, established by Administrative Judge Florence Kelly, that Judge Breitel cited approvingly in People ex rel. Guggenheim v. Mueci (supra). In view of the foregoing, and mindful of the nature of the offense and respondent's involvement — albeit not in the actual stabbing — the parole application is denied. And, leave to appeal is withheld because, in the event of an adverse final disposition, the court can then exercise its review powers. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Nunez, Lane, Steuer and Capozzoli, JJ.