Case Name: Nathan Bijur, appellant, v. Standard Distilling and Distributing Company, respondent
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1911-06-19
Citations: 78 N.J. Eq. 582
Docket Number: 
Parties: Nathan Bijur, appellant, v. Standard Distilling and Distributing Company, respondent.
Judges: For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Voori-iees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Congdon, Sullivan — 11.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 78
Pages: 582–582

Head Matter:
Nathan Bijur, appellant, v. Standard Distilling and Distributing Company, respondent.
[Argued March 9th, 1911.
Decided June 19th, 1911.]
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Emery, whose opinion is reported in 74 N. J. Eq. (4 Buch.) 546.
Mr. Benjamin N. Cardoza (of the New York bar), for the appellant.
Mr. Levy Mayer (of the Illinois bar), for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Emery.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Voori-iees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Congdon, Sullivan — 11.
For reversal — None.