Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. RONALD LYLE BEAVERS, Appellant; STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. RONALD LYLE BEAVERS, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1992-10-21
Citations: 115 Or. App. 752
Docket Number: DCR89-12591; CA A71612 (Control); 91-985, CA A71613
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. RONALD LYLE BEAVERS, Appellant. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. RONALD LYLE BEAVERS, Appellant.
Judges: Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Joseph, Chief Judge, and Durham, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 115
Pages: 752–753

Head Matter:
Submitted on record and briefs September 18,
CA A71613 affirmed; CA A71612 remanded for resentencing and otherwise affirmed October 21, 1992
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. RONALD LYLE BEAVERS, Appellant. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. RONALD LYLE BEAVERS, Appellant.
(DCR89-12591; CA A71612 (Control))
(91-985, CA A71613)
(Cases Consolidated for Appeal)
838 P2d 644
Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, and David C. Degner, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, filed the brief for appellant.
Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Janet A. Klapstein, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Joseph, Chief Judge, and Durham, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant was convicted of felony driving while suspended (DWS), and his probation on an earlier theft conviction was revoked. Although he has appealed in both cases by a single notice of appeal, he assigns no error to the judgment in the DWS case. In the theft case, he asserts that the trial court lacked the authority to modify a previously ordered, but unexecuted, jail sentence by ordering that it be served consecutively to an unrelated prison sentence. The state concedes that defendant is correct, and we accept the concession.
CA A71613 affirmed; CA A71612 remanded for resentencing and otherwise affirmed.