Case Name: U.S. v. Brett M. Gaskill
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-01-27
Citations: 73 M.J. 207
Docket Number: No. 14-0134/AR
Parties: U.S. v. Brett M. Gaskill.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Military Justice Reporter
Volume: 73
Pages: 207–207

Head Matter:
Monday, January 27, 2014
No. 14-0134/AR.
U.S. v. Brett M. Gaskill.

Opinion:
CCA 20110028. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, and in light of United States v. Lubasky, 68 M.J. 260 (C.A.A.F.2010), we note that the proper victim in Specifications 2, 3, and 4 of Charge V was the merchant who provided the goods and services upon false pretenses, not the debit cardholder/Soldier. However, the charge sheet, stipulation of fact, and providence inquiry focused on the three Soldiers as victims, and there was no discussion on the record of whether the merchants were victimized. See Lubasky, 68 M.J. at 263. Accordingly, it is ordered that said petition is granted on the following issue:
WHETHER APPELLANT COMMITTED LARCENIES OF THE PROPERTY OF THREE SOLDIERS BY USING THEIR BANK CARDS WITHOUT AUTHORITY.
The decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is reversed as to Specifications 2, 3, and 4 of Charge V, and the findings of guilty as to those specifications are set aside. The remaining findings are affirmed. The record is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army for remand to the Court of Criminal Appeals. That court may either dismiss Specifications 2, 3, and 4 of Charge V and reassess the sentence based on the affirmed findings, or it may order a rehearing on the affected specifications and the sentence. [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]