Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bryan Gene BERRYMAN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-12-17
Citations: 115 F. App'x 240
Docket Number: No. 04-40696
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bryan Gene BERRYMAN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 115
Pages: 240–240

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bryan Gene BERRYMAN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 04-40696.
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Decided Dec. 17, 2004.
Michelle S. Englade, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Beaumont, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Frank Warren Henderson, Amy R. Blalock, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Tyler, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Bryan Gene Berryman pleaded guilty pursuant to a written plea agreement to receipt of child pornography. He was sentenced to 57 months of imprisonment, three years of supervised release, and a $100 special assessment. Berryman argues for the first time on appeal that the district court erred in enhancing his sentence based on facts that were not found by a jury or admitted by Berryman. He contends that, in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Blakely v. Washington, — U.S.-, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), such enhancements violate the Fifth and Sixth Amendments. As Berryman acknowledges, this issue is foreclosed. See United States v. Pineiro, 377 F.3d 464, 473 (5th Cir.2004), petition for cert. filed (U.S. July 14, 2004) (No. 04-5263).
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.