Case Name: Ann ENGLE, Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. ANN, Cindy Shaw, and David Dinter, Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2014-03-25
Citations: 425 S.W.3d 223
Docket Number: No. ED 100223
Parties: Ann ENGLE, Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. ANN, Cindy Shaw, and David Dinter, Respondents.
Judges: Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., KURT S. ODENWALD, J., and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 425
Pages: 223–223

Head Matter:
Ann ENGLE, Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. ANN, Cindy Shaw, and David Dinter, Respondents.
No. ED 100223.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
March 25, 2014.
Benjamin Todd Aranda, Aranda Law Firm, PC, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Keith K. Cheung, Edward James Sluys, Co-Counsel, and Steven Walter Garrett, Co-Counsel for City of St. Ann, Cindy Shaw and David Dinter, Curtis, Heinz, Barrett & O’Keefe, Clayton, MO, for respondent.
Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., KURT S. ODENWALD, J., and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Ann Engle appeals from the judgment granted in favor of City of St. Ann, Cindy Shaw, and David Dinter on their motion to dismiss the cause of action for failure to state a claim. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).