Case Name: Inalvis CASERO, Appellant, v. Edith B. MARTINEZ, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2003-03-19
Citations: 844 So. 2d 663
Docket Number: No. 3D02-1271
Parties: Inalvis CASERO, Appellant, v. Edith B. MARTINEZ, Appellee.
Judges: Before COPE, GERSTEN and WELLS, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 844
Pages: 663–663

Head Matter:
Inalvis CASERO, Appellant, v. Edith B. MARTINEZ, Appellee.
No. 3D02-1271.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 19, 2003.
Rehearing Denied May 14, 2003.
Joseph F. Lopez, Coral Gables, for appellant.
Hinshaw & Culbertson and Gina E. Caruso and Nickolas C. Berry, for appellee.
Before COPE, GERSTEN and WELLS, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The summary judgment is affirmed on authority of Spector v. Ahrenholz, 107 So.2d 34, 36 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958); see also Mills v. Mills, 112 So.2d 298 (Fla. 2d DCA 1959); Rappaport v. Kalstein, 156 Fla. 722, 24 So.2d 301 (1946). It is our view that the trial court correctly applied the principles described in those decisions to the case now before us.
Affirmed.