Case Name: Sydney Cheryl SUTTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-11-04
Citations: 298 F. App'x 245
Docket Number: No. 08-1380
Parties: Sydney Cheryl SUTTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 298
Pages: 245–245

Head Matter:
Sydney Cheryl SUTTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 08-1380.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 22, 2008.
Decided: Nov. 4, 2008.
Charles E. Monteith, Jr., Shelli H. Rice, Monteith & Rice, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Roy Cooper, Attorney General for North Carolina, Victoria L. Voight, Special Deputy Attorney General, Sonya Calloway-Durham, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Sydney Cheryl Sutton appeals the district court's order granting Defendant summary judgment on her retaliation claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000), and the North Carolina Whistleblower Act, N.C. Gen.Stat. § 126-85 (2005). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sutton v. North Carolina Dep't of Labor, No. 5:06-cv-00S08-FL (E.D.N.C. filed Feb. 28, 2008; entered March 3, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.