Case Name: B & O RADIO, INCORPORATED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1936-04-02
Citations: 116 N.J.L. 301
Docket Number: 
Parties: B & O RADIO, INCORPORATED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 116
Pages: 301–304

Head Matter:
B & O RADIO, INCORPORATED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Submitted October 25, 1935 —
Decided April 2, 1936.
For the appellant, Haines & Chanalis and Patrick J. Maloney.
For the respondent, Carey & Lane, Robert Carey and Harry Lane.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We agree with the conclusions of Judge Smith that the ease is within the holdings of this court in Domestic Electric Co., Inc., v. Mezzaluna, 109 N. J. L. 574, and Russ Distributing Corp. v. Litchman, 111 Id. 21. To these cases may be added that of Smyth Sales Corp. v. Norfolk Building and Loan Association, 116 Id. 293.
For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Chief Justice, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Hetfield, Deae, WolfsKeil, Raffeety, JJ. 9.
For reversal — Bodine, Hehee, Peeskie, Wells, JJ. 4.