Case Name: Inocente M. MARTINEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-12-11
Citations: 831 So. 2d 820
Docket Number: No. 3D01-1069
Parties: Inocente M. MARTINEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and LEVY and GREEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 831
Pages: 820–820

Head Matter:
Inocente M. MARTINEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D01-1069.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 11, 2002.
Inocente M. Martinez, in proper person.
Richard E. Doran, Attorney General and Paulette R. Taylor, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and LEVY and GREEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The trial judge properly dismissed the defendant's Rule 3.850 motion without prejudice because of his failure to sign the motion and thus to provide the verification required by Rule 3.850(c). See Groover v. State, 703 So.2d 1035 (Fla.1997).
Affirmed.