Case Name: 80-12 Astoria Blvd. Corp., Appellant, v. William C. Emmanuel & Son, Inc., et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1989-06-05
Citations: 151 A.D.2d 456
Docket Number: 
Parties: 80-12 Astoria Blvd. Corp., Appellant, v William C. Emmanuel & Son, Inc., et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 151
Pages: 456–456

Head Matter:
80-12 Astoria Blvd. Corp., Appellant, v William C. Emmanuel & Son, Inc., et al., Respondents.

Opinion:
In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Santucci, J.), dated May 11, 1988, which denied its motion for summary judgment.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.
We find, as did the Supreme Court, that triable issues of fact exist as to whether the premises were insured at the time of the fire. This pivotal issue cannot be determined on the basis of the conflicting motion papers. Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Kunzeman and Balletta, JJ., concur.