Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles J. PAYTON; Ruby Payton, Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-09-25
Citations: 583 F. App'x 215
Docket Number: No. 14-1143
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles J. PAYTON; Ruby Payton, Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 583
Pages: 215–216

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles J. PAYTON; Ruby Payton, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 14-1143.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 23, 2014.
Decided: Sept. 25, 2014.
Charles James Payton and Ruby Pay-ton, Appellants Pro Se. Bruce R. Ellisen, Curtis Clarence Pett, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Charles J. and Ruby Payton appeal the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of the government in the government's action to reduce Mr. Payton's tax liabilities to judgment, to set aside as fraudulent Mr. Payton's conveyance of his interest in their marital residence to Mrs. Payton, and to foreclose tax liens against the residence and order its sale. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Payton, No. 4:13-cv-00055-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 3, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.