Case Name: Icelene BROWN et al., Petitioners, v. The CITY OF DAYTONA BEACH, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1973-12-05
Citations: 286 So. 2d 547
Docket Number: No. 43,552
Parties: Icelene BROWN et al., Petitioners, v. The CITY OF DAYTONA BEACH, Respondent.
Judges: CARLTON, C. J„ and BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 286
Pages: 547–548

Head Matter:
Icelene BROWN et al., Petitioners, v. The CITY OF DAYTONA BEACH, Respondent.
No. 43,552.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Dec. 5, 1973.
Morris W. Milton of Minnis, Williams & Milton, St. Petersburg, for petitioners.
John C. Chew, City Atty. and H. Pope Hamrick, Jr. of Kinsey, Vincent, Pyle & Williams, Daytona Beach, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.
It is so ordered.
CARLTON, C. J" and BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
ERVIN, J., dissents with opinion.