Case Name: William Venetsanos, Defendant Below, Appellant, vs. George Pappas, Complainant Below, Appellee
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Delaware
Decision Date: 1934-03-07
Citations: 20 Del. Ch. 453
Docket Number: 
Parties: William Venetsanos, Defendant Below, Appellant, vs. George Pappas, Complainant Below, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Delaware Chancery Reports
Volume: 20
Pages: 453–453

Head Matter:
William Venetsanos, Defendant Below, Appellant, vs. George Pappas, Complainant Below, Appellee.
Supreme Court,
On Appeal, March 7, 1934.
Layton, C. J., and Harrington, Richards, Rodney, and Reinhardt, JJ., sitting.
Charles L. Terry, Jr., for appellant.
William Prickett, and William M. Hope, for appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Chancellor in Pappas v. Venetsanos, 19 Del. Ch. 347, 167 A. 842. The assignments of error are concerned with conclusions of fact which ought not to be disturbed except upon a clear showing of error in the conception and interpretation of the testimony. From a close examination of the lengthy record we are satisfied that the Chancellor's conclusions were fully warranted. The decree is accordingly affirmed.