Case Name: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. LEON O. HART, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1915-03-25
Citations: 87 N.J.L. 329
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. LEON O. HART, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 87
Pages: 329–330

Head Matter:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. LEON O. HART, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Submitted July 10, 1914—
Decided March 25, 1915.
On error to the Supreme Court, in which court the following per curiam was filed:
“Per curiam—The indictment in this case must be quashed. The case cannot be distinguished from State v. Nugent, 48 Vroom 157.”
Eor ilie plaintiff in error, Harlan Besson and Mark Townsend, Jr.
Eor the defendant in error, Robert H. Hudspeth, prosecutor of the pleas.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The court being equally divided in opinion, the judgment under review must be affirmed.
For affirmance—The Ci-iiee Justice, Parker, Minturn, Kalisct-i, Bogeet, Vredenburgh, Williams, JJ. 7.
For reversal—The Chancellor, Garrison, Trenohard,' Black, White, Terhune, Hepeenheimer, JJ. 7.