Case Name: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Neal Lamont PATTON, Petitioner
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2008-06-27
Citations: 952 A.2d 1166
Docket Number: 
Parties: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Neal Lamont PATTON, Petitioner.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 952
Pages: 1166–1166

Head Matter:
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Neal Lamont PATTON, Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
June 27, 2008.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 27th day of June, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:
Whether the per se rule of DeJesus applies in non-capital cases; if not, was the within request improper and prejudicial?