Case Name: In re: Guetatchew FIKROU, Debtor; Guetatchew Fikrou, Appellant, v. Devin Derham-Burk, Chapter 13 Trustee; et al., Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-04-15
Citations: 32 F. App'x 494
Docket Number: No. 01-15160, NC-00-01106-RYGR; BAP No. NC-00-01106-RyGR
Parties: In re: Guetatchew FIKROU, Debtor. Guetatchew Fikrou, Appellant, v. Devin Derham-Burk, Chapter 13 Trustee; et al., Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 32
Pages: 494–495

Head Matter:
In re: Guetatchew FIKROU, Debtor. Guetatchew Fikrou, Appellant, v. Devin Derham-Burk, Chapter 13 Trustee; et al., Appellees.
No. 01-15160, NC-00-01106-RYGR.
BAP No. NC-00-01106-RyGR.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 8, 2002 .
Decided April 15, 2002.
Before BROWNING, KLEINFELD, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, appellant’s request for oral argument is denied.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Guetatchew Fikrou appeals pro se the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's ("BAP") affirmance of the bankruptcy court's summary judgment in favor of defendants in his adversary action, which challenged the transfer of property. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We independently review the BAP decision. See United States v. Battley (In re Kimura), 969 F.2d 806, 810 (9th Cir.1992). We review for clear error the bankruptcy court's findings of fact, and we review de novo its conclusions of law. See id. We affirm for the reasons stated in the BAP's memorandum disposition filed December 20, 2000.
Fikrou's remaining contentions are without merit.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.