Case Name: J. FRANK BROOKS, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF ORANGE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1972-12-04
Citations: 61 N.J. 576
Docket Number: 
Parties: J. FRANK BROOKS, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF ORANGE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 61
Pages: 576–577

Head Matter:
J. FRANK BROOKS, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF ORANGE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Argued November 20, 1972
Decided December 4, 1972.
Mr. Samuel A. Gennet argued the cause for appellants (Mr. John Methfessel, on the brief; Messrs. Gennet and Methfessel, attorneys).
Mr. Maurice B. McLaughlin argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Galvin and McLaughlin, attorneys).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Certification was granted in this matter, 60 N. J. 514 (1972), and also in J. H. M. Realty Corp. v. Town of Belleville, 60 N. J. 471 (1972), also decided this day, 61 N. J. 577, to permit consideration of the doctrine of Reimann v. Monmouth Consolidated Water Co., 9 N. J. 134 (1952), and Sydney Grossman Hotel Corp. v. Lakewood Water Co., 27 N. J. 91 (1958). We are not persuaded to depart from those decisions and hence the judgment herein is affirmed.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub, Justices Hall and Mountain, and Judges Conford, Sullivan and Lewis —6
For reversal — None.