Case Name: EAGLE OIL & GAS CO., Appellant v. TRO-X, L.P., Appellee; and TRO-X, L.P., Cross-Appellant v. Eagle Oil & Gas Partners, LLC, Cross-Appellee
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 2014-04-24
Citations: 427 S.W.3d 580
Docket Number: No. 11-11-00290-CV
Parties: EAGLE OIL & GAS CO., Appellant v. TRO-X, L.P., Appellee. and TRO-X, L.P., Cross-Appellant v. Eagle Oil & Gas Partners, LLC, Cross-Appellee.
Judges: Panel consists of: WRIGHT, C.J., BAILEY, J„ and McCALL.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 427
Pages: 580–581

Head Matter:
EAGLE OIL & GAS CO., Appellant v. TRO-X, L.P., Appellee. and TRO-X, L.P., Cross-Appellant v. Eagle Oil & Gas Partners, LLC, Cross-Appellee.
No. 11-11-00290-CV.
Court of Appeals of Texas, Eastland.
April 24, 2014.
Brett Kutnick, Deborah G. Hankinson, Jennifer Rangel Stagen, Hankinson LLP, Dallas, John A. Jad Davis, Jacob M. Davidson, Davis, Gerald & Cremer, P.C., Midland, for Appellant.
Rick G. Strange, W. Bruce Williams, W. Clark Lea, Cotton, Bledsoe, Tighe & Dawson, P.C., Midland, for Appellee.
Panel consists of: WRIGHT, C.J., BAILEY, J„ and McCALL.
. Terry McCall, Retired Justice, Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland, sitting by assignment.

Opinion:
OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
PER CURIAM.
TRO-X, L.P. has filed a motion for rehearing in this court. In its motion, TRO-X reaffirms its previous issues and also requests that we correct the opinion and modify the judgment issued in this cause on October 31, 2013. TRO-X takes issue with the following statement from this court's original opinion: "There was never any production on properties covered by the New Prospects Agreement, and the leases were not otherwise kept alive and, ultimately, expired." We agree with TRO-X that the record does not reflect that all of the leases expired, and we issue this opinion to note that correction.
TRO-X additionally requests that this court modify the judgment to reflect that TRO-X is entitled to receive record title to TRO-X's beneficial interests held in trust by Eagle Oil & Gas Co. or, alternatively, that this court remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings. We decline these requests. The record reflects that, at trial, TRO-X did not seek record title of these interests and that TRO-X's pleadings would not support such a judgment. A judgment must be supported by the pleadings. Cunningham v. Parkdale Bank, 660 S.W.2d 810, 813 (Tex.1983); see Ropa Exploration Corp. v. Barash Energy, Ltd., No. 02-11-00258-CV, 2013 WL 2631164, at *13 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth June 13, 2013, pet. denied) (mem. op.).
The motion for rehearing is denied.
WILLSON, J., not participating.