Case Name: Kelvin SETTLE, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-02-19
Citations: 498 F. App'x 665
Docket Number: No. 12-3277
Parties: Kelvin SETTLE, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before MURPHY, SMITH, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 498
Pages: 665–665

Head Matter:
Kelvin SETTLE, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 12-3277.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 23, 2013.
Filed: Feb. 19, 2013.
Kelvin Settle, Terre Haute, IN, pro se.
Jennifer Winfield, Special, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Saint Louis, MO, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before MURPHY, SMITH, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Federal inmate Kelvin Settle appeals the district court's dismissal of his motion for return of property and denial of his motion to sanction the government. Having carefully reviewed the record, we find no basis for reversal. See 18 U.S.C. § 983(e)(1) (requirements for granting motion to set aside declaration of forfeiture include that moving party did not know or have reason to know of seizure within suf-fieient time to file timely claim); 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (false-statement offense and penalties do not apply to party to judicial proceeding). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny the pending motion.
. The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.