Case Name: Ruesch International, Inc., Appellant, v. Martin Mac-Cormack, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1995-12-21
Citations: 222 A.D.2d 343
Docket Number: 
Parties: Ruesch International, Inc., Appellant, v Martin Mac-Cormack, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 222
Pages: 343–343

Head Matter:
Ruesch International, Inc., Appellant, v Martin Mac-Cormack, Respondent.
[635 NYS2d 226]

Opinion:
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lowe, III, J.), entered on or about May 22, 1995, which denied plaintiff's motion to preliminarily enjoin defendant, its former employee, from utilizing allegedly confidential client information, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The customer information that defendant took with him when he left plaintiff's employ but then returned when accused by plaintiff of illegal removal appears to be readily ascertainable from publicly available services and otherwise unqualified for trade secret protection (see, U. S. Reins. Corp. v Humphreys, 205 AD2d 187, 191-192; compare, Leo Silfen, Inc. v Cream, 29 NY2d 387, 393, with Business Intelligence Servs. v Hudson, 580 F Supp 1068, 1072). Accordingly, injunctive relief restraining defendant's use of that information is not available (see, American Broadcasting Cos. v Wolf, 52 NY2d 394, 403-404), unless his physical taking of the materials containing the information can be said to have been "an egregious breach of trust and confidence" while still in plaintiff's employ (Leo Silfen, Inc. v Cream, supra, at 392). At this juncture, such cannot be said (compare, Bruno Co. v Friedherg, 21 AD2d 336). We have considered plaintiff's other arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur — Wallach, J. P., Kupferman, Ross, Williams and Tom, JJ.