Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bradford HALVORSEN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-12-01
Citations: 302 F. App'x 559
Docket Number: No. 08-30028
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bradford HALVORSEN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 302
Pages: 559–560

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bradford HALVORSEN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-30028.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Nov. 18, 2008.
Filed Dec. 1, 2008.
Edward Eric Zink, Esquire, Special Assistant U.S., USBI-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Billings, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
David Merchant, Assistant Federal Public Defender, FDMT-Federal Defenders of Montana, Billings, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, B. FLETCHER and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
On de novo review, we conclude that the probation officers had reasonable suspicion to conduct the search, which was all that Halvorsen's probation conditions required. The district court properly denied Halvorsen's motion to suppress. See United States v. Knights, 534 U.S. 112, 121, 122 S.Ct. 587, 151 L.Ed.2d 497 (2001); United States v. Stokes, 292 F.3d 964, 967 (9th Cir.2002).
AlFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.