Case Name: In re Judy Kay MISKELL, Petitioner. Judy Kay Miskell, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Conrad W. Varner, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-02-27
Citations: 511 F. App'x 272
Docket Number: Nos. 12-2521, 12-2549
Parties: In re Judy Kay MISKELL, Petitioner. Judy Kay Miskell, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Conrad W. Varner, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before AGEE and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 511
Pages: 272–272

Head Matter:
In re Judy Kay MISKELL, Petitioner. Judy Kay Miskell, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Conrad W. Varner, Defendant-Appellee.
Nos. 12-2521, 12-2549.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 21, 2013.
Decided: Feb. 27, 2013.
Judy Kay Miskell, Petitioner/Appellant Pro Se. Melvin F. O’Brien, Dickie, McCamey & Chilcote, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before AGEE and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Judy Kay Miskell appeals the district court's order denying her Rule 59 motion. Miskell has also petitioned for a writ of prohibition and filed a motion to stay. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court, deny the petition for a writ of prohibition, and deny the motion to stay. Miskell v. Varner, No. 3:12-cv-00052-GMG-DJJ (N.D.W.Va. Dec. 12, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
No. 12-2521 PETITION DENIED.
No. 12-2549 AFFIRMED.