Case Name: In the INTEREST OF D.V.A. Julie Lawyer, Assistant State's Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee v. D.V.A., Respondent and Appellant
Court: North Dakota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: North Dakota
Decision Date: 2018-12-06
Citations: 920 N.W.2d 454
Docket Number: No. 20180166
Parties: In the INTEREST OF D.V.A.
Judges: 
Reporter: North Western Reporter 2d
Volume: 920
Pages: 454–454

Head Matter:
In the INTEREST OF D.V.A.
Julie Lawyer, Assistant State's Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee
v.
D.V.A., Respondent and Appellant
No. 20180166
Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Filed December 6, 2018
Ryan A. Keefe (on brief), Assistant State's Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for petitioner and appellee.
Kent M. Morrow (on brief), Bismarck, ND, for respondent and appellant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
[¶ 1] D.V.A. appeals from a district court order denying his petition for discharge from treatment and finding he remains a sexually dangerous individual. D.V.A. argues the district court erred in denying his application for discharge because the order is not supported by sufficient evidence that he would likely engage in further acts of sexually predatory conduct placing others in danger under N.D.C.C. § 25-03.3-01(9). The district court's findings of fact and order are supported by clear and convincing evidence, and we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Jon J. Jensen
Jerod E. Tufte