Case Name: ASHLAND OIL, INC., a Kentucky corporation; Bell Fuels, Inc., a Nevada corporation; Jasper County Farm Bureau Cooperative Association, an Indiana corporation; and Marathon Petroleum Company, an Ohio corporation, Appellants (Plaintiffs Below), v. TOY REX ARNETT, Jr.; Rena Arnett, his wife; Thomas Arnett; Super Payless Gas, Inc., an Indiana corporation; and Charles Arnett, Appellees (Defendants Below)
Court: Court of Appeals of Indiana
Jurisdiction: Indiana
Decision Date: 1986-11-24
Citations: 500 N.E.2d 228
Docket Number: No. 3-885A216
Parties: ASHLAND OIL, INC., a Kentucky corporation; Bell Fuels, Inc., a Nevada corporation; Jasper County Farm Bureau Cooperative Association, an Indiana corporation; and Marathon Petroleum Company, an Ohio corporation, Appellants (Plaintiffs Below), v. TOY REX ARNETT, Jr.; Rena Arnett, his wife; Thomas Arnett; Super Payless Gas, Inc., an Indiana corporation; and Charles Arnett, Appellees (Defendants Below).
Judges: STATON, P.J., and GARRARD, J., concur.
Reporter: North Eastern Reporter 2d
Volume: 500
Pages: 228–228

Head Matter:
ASHLAND OIL, INC., a Kentucky corporation; Bell Fuels, Inc., a Nevada corporation; Jasper County Farm Bureau Cooperative Association, an Indiana corporation; and Marathon Petroleum Company, an Ohio corporation, Appellants (Plaintiffs Below), v. TOY REX ARNETT, Jr.; Rena Arnett, his wife; Thomas Arnett; Super Payless Gas, Inc., an Indiana corporation; and Charles Arnett, Appellees (Defendants Below).
No. 3-885A216.
Court of Appeals of Indiana, Third District.
Nov. 24, 1986.
Robert S. Nesbitt, Fisher and Nesbitt, Rensselaer, Stephen J. Schostok, Melbourne A. Noel, Jr., Richard G. Siegel, Brad A. Levin, Laser, Schostok, Kolman & Frank, Chicago, for appellants.
Karen L. Hughes, Larry Evans, Barbara A. Young, Hoeppner, Wagner & Evans, Valparaiso, for appellees.

Opinion:
OPINION ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
HOFFMAN, Judge.
On petition for rehearing plaintiffs assert error in the Appellate Court decision of August 28, 1986, 496 N.E.2d 1313, in that Vurpillat et al. v. Zehner et al. (1891), 2 Ind.App. 397, 28 N.E. 556 was incorrectly characterized as an Indiana Supreme Court opinion. This erroneous characterization was brought to the attention of the Court prior to the issuance of the opinion. Regretfully, uncorrected copies of the opinion were sent to the attorneys and the trial judge. However, a correct copy was sent to West Publishing Company, the official Indiana Cases publisher.
The petition for rehearing is denied.
STATON, P.J., and GARRARD, J., concur.