Case Name: John C. AMIS, Jr., Appellant, v. Henry HARRIS, Arthur Church, Susan K. Cross, Roger Robinson, Glen Wilcox, James O. Butler, Eunice Harris and Frank B. Watson, Jr., and John Doe (City of Fort Myers), Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1985-12-18
Citations: 480 So. 2d 188
Docket Number: No. 85-1149
Parties: John C. AMIS, Jr., Appellant, v. Henry HARRIS, Arthur Church, Susan K. Cross, Roger Robinson, Glen Wilcox, James O. Butler, Eunice Harris and Frank B. Watson, Jr., and John Doe (City of Fort Myers), Appellees.
Judges: RYDER, C.J., and DANAHY and FRANK, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 480
Pages: 188–189

Head Matter:
John C. AMIS, Jr., Appellant, v. Henry HARRIS, Arthur Church, Susan K. Cross, Roger Robinson, Glen Wilcox, James O. Butler, Eunice Harris and Frank B. Watson, Jr., and John Doe (City of Fort Myers), Appellees.
No. 85-1149.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Dec. 18, 1985.
John C. Amis, Jr., pro se.
Gerald W. Pierce of Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, P.A., Fort Myers, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The instant appeal is dismissed. The appellant has sought review of the trial court's order dismissing with prejudice five counts of an eight count amended complaint. Each of the dismissed counts is interrelated with and originates in the same factual setting giving rise to the three remaining counts which were also dismissed but with leave again to amend. Neal v. Matherson, 410 So.2d 596 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). The record discloses the appellant filed a second amended complaint, also challenged by a motion to dismiss, approximately one week prior to the filing of the notice of appeal. In the event the appellant appeals from a final order, the questions presented in the appeal we now dismiss may be reasserted. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.130(g).
RYDER, C.J., and DANAHY and FRANK, JJ., concur.