Case Name: William TANNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-04-26
Citations: 652 So. 2d 1295
Docket Number: No. 95-0327
Parties: William TANNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: STONE, KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 652
Pages: 1295–1296

Head Matter:
William TANNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 95-0327.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
April 26, 1995.
William Tanner, Sanderson, pro se appellant.
Robert Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Patricia Ann Ash, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, William Tanner, seeks review of an order of the trial court which summarily denied his motion filed pursuant to Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.850. The order denying the motion was filed without an evidentiary hearing but it incorporated by reference the state's response to the motion which attached portions of the trial record. Because we do not find that the allegations of the motion were either legally insufficient or conclusively disproved by the portions of the record which were incorporated into the order, we reverse and remand. The trial court may either conduct an evidentiary hearing or attachment of those portions of the record which conclusively disprove the allegations of the motion.
STONE, KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.