Case Name: Gary D. HICKS; Clyde Casey; Jean Casey, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. WILSHIRE CREDIT CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-01-07
Citations: 261 F. App'x 551
Docket Number: No. 07-1287
Parties: Gary D. HICKS; Clyde Casey; Jean Casey, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. WILSHIRE CREDIT CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 261
Pages: 551–552

Head Matter:
Gary D. HICKS; Clyde Casey; Jean Casey, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. WILSHIRE CREDIT CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 07-1287.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 30, 2007.
Decided Jan. 7, 2008.
M. Albert Figinski, John A. Pica, Jr., Michael W. Reed, Thomas P. Kelly, Law Offices of Peter G. Angelos, PC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellants. Brian L. Moffet, Gordon, Feinblatt, Rothman, Hoffberger & Hollander, LLC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Gary Hicks, Clyde Casey, and Jean Casey appeal the district court's order denying their motion to remand and granting Wilshire Credit Corporation's Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the parties' briefs and the record on appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court at the hearing held on February 26, 2007. Hicks v. Wilshire Credit Corp., No. 8:06-cv-02195-RWT (D.Md. Feb. 26, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.