Case Name: R.H.H., Petitioner/Respondent, v. N.L.S., Respondent/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2014-06-17
Citations: 434 S.W.3d 114
Docket Number: No. ED 100550
Parties: R.H.H., Petitioner/Respondent, v. N.L.S., Respondent/Appellant.
Judges: Before MARY K. HOFF, P. J., KURT S. ODENWALD, J., and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 434
Pages: 114–114

Head Matter:
R.H.H., Petitioner/Respondent, v. N.L.S., Respondent/Appellant.
No. ED 100550.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
June 17, 2014.
Christopher Gerard Scholz, Scholz, Loos, Palmer, Siebers & Duesterhaus, LLP, Quincy, IL, for Appellant.
John Gravatt McIntosh, De Coster Law, Montieello, MO, for Juveniles.
Jeffrey Robert Curl, Curl & Hark, LLC, Hannibal, MO, for Respondent.
Before MARY K. HOFF, P. J., KURT S. ODENWALD, J., and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
N.L.S. appeals from the court's Judgment of the Full Order of Child Protection (Full Order of Child Protection) temporarily awarding custody of T.N.H. and C.L.H. to R.H.H. and prohibiting N.L.S. from engaging in certain conduct for the duration of the Full Order of Child Protection. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).