Case Name: CHARLES L. HOWK, Respondent, v. TALMADGE ECKERT, Impleaded, etc., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1874
Citations: 9 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 113
Docket Number: 
Parties: CHARLES L. HOWK, Respondent, v. TALMADGE ECKERT, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Supreme Court Reports (Hun)
Volume: 9
Pages: 113–113

Head Matter:
CHARLES L. HOWK, Respondent, v. TALMADGE ECKERT, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon the report of a referee.
This action was brought upon a promissory note. The General Term held, that the defendant was induced to give the note by false representations and menaces, in settlement of a felony, and that, as the plaintiff was not a bona fide purchaser, without notice, he could not recover.
William Lounsbery, for the appellant.
A. Schoonmaker, Jr., for the respondent.

Opinion:
Opinion by Boardman, J.
Miller, P. J., and Bockes, J., concurred.
Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event.