Case Name: William Tyndall, Appellant, v. Robert J. Garlick, and George Rezac, Appellees
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1926-02-24
Citations: 91 Fla. 319
Docket Number: 
Parties: William Tyndall, Appellant, v. Robert J. Garlick, and George Rezac, Appellees.
Judges: Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 91
Pages: 319–320

Head Matter:
William Tyndall, Appellant, v. Robert J. Garlick, and George Rezac, Appellees.
Division B.
Decision Filed February 24, 1926.
M. S. Bobst and W. F. Brown, for Appellant;
Shutts & Bowen, for Appellees.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.