Case Name: James M. BROCCO; Olga Brocco, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Ricky SAVAGE, Defendant-Appellee, and Ed Woodard; County of Fairfax, Virginia; the Fitness Company; Hyatt Corporation, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-11-28
Citations: 22 F. App'x 202
Docket Number: No. 01-1824
Parties: James M. BROCCO; Olga Brocco, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Ricky SAVAGE, Defendant-Appellee, and Ed Woodard; County of Fairfax, Virginia; the Fitness Company; Hyatt Corporation, Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 22
Pages: 202–202

Head Matter:
James M. BROCCO; Olga Brocco, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Ricky SAVAGE, Defendant-Appellee, and Ed Woodard; County of Fairfax, Virginia; the Fitness Company; Hyatt Corporation, Defendants.
No. 01-1824.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 19, 2001.
Decided Nov. 28, 2001.
Victor M. Glasberg, Kelly M. Baldrate, Victor M. Glasberg & Associates, Alexandria, VA; Henry W. Asbill, William B. Moffitt, Asbill, Junkin, Moffitt & Boss, Chtd., Washington, DC, for appellants. David J. Fudala, Fairfax, VA, for appellee.
Before WIDENED and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
James and Olga Broceo appeal the district court's order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Brocco v. Savage, No. CA-00-1685-A (E.D.Va. May 18, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.