Case Name: CITIBANK, N.A., Respondent, v. Chris CACIOPPO, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2013-10-22
Citations: 411 S.W.3d 867
Docket Number: No. WD 75927
Parties: CITIBANK, N.A., Respondent, v. Chris CACIOPPO, Appellant.
Judges: Before Division Three: KAREN KING MITCHELL, Presiding Judge, and LISA WHITE HARDWICK and GARY D. WITT, Judges.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 411
Pages: 867–868

Head Matter:
CITIBANK, N.A., Respondent, v. Chris CACIOPPO, Appellant.
No. WD 75927.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Oct. 22, 2013.
Michael H. Berman and J. Brock Row-att, Kansas City, MO, for respondent.
James L. Baker and Bruce E. Strauss, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
Before Division Three: KAREN KING MITCHELL, Presiding Judge, and LISA WHITE HARDWICK and GARY D. WITT, Judges.

Opinion:
Order
PER CURIAM:
Chris Cacioppo appeals the trial court's judgment entered in favor of CitiBank, N.A., on its claims for breach of contract and account stated, resulting from defaulted credit obligations on a business credit account issued by CitiBank in Cacioppo's name. Cacioppo argues that the trial court's judgment is not supported by substantial evidence insofar as there was no evidence that Cacioppo, rather than Tera-source (the business he worked for), was the account holder and therefore primarily responsible for complying with the terms of the credit agreement. Because the evidence and reasonable inferences derived therefrom support the trial court's judgment, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).