Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Javier SANCHEZ-SANCHEZ, a.k.a. Edgar Garcia Suarez, a.k.a. Edgar Sanchez Suarez, a.k.a. Julio Cesar Deconstancia, a.k.a. Hoskar Rangel, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-05-24
Citations: 132 F. App'x 321
Docket Number: No. 04-12585; D.C. Docket No. 03-00748 CR-1-1
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Javier SANCHEZ-SANCHEZ, a.k.a. Edgar Garcia Suarez, a.k.a. Edgar Sanchez Suarez, a.k.a. Julio Cesar Deconstancia, a.k.a. Hoskar Rangel, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 132
Pages: 321–322

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Javier SANCHEZ-SANCHEZ, a.k.a. Edgar Garcia Suarez, a.k.a. Edgar Sanchez Suarez, a.k.a. Julio Cesar Deconstancia, a.k.a. Hoskar Rangel, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 04-12585.
D.C. Docket No. 03-00748 CR-1-1.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
May 24, 2005.
Yonette Sam-Buchanan, Amy Levin Weil, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Nicole Marie Kaplan, Stephanie Kearns, Federal Public Defender, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before TJOFLAT and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges and LIMBAUGH, District Judge.
Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See 11th Cir. R. 36-1.
. 11th Cir. R. 36-1 provides:
When the court determines that any of the following circumstances exist:
(a) judgment of the district court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous;
(b) the evidence in support of a juiy verdict is sufficient;
(c) the order of an administrative agency is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole;
(d) summary judgment, directed verdict, or judgment on the pleadings is supported by the record;
(e) judgment has been entered without a reversible error of law; and an opinion would have no precedential value, the judgment or order may be affirmed or enforced without opinion.