Case Name: In the Matter of the Application of John H. Meehan and Others, Respondents, for an Order against Joseph D. McGoldrick, as Comptroller of the City of New York and as Successor of Frank J. Taylor, Fiorello H. LaGuardia, as Mayor, and Others, Constituting the Board of Estimate of the City of New York, and The Board of Estimate of The City of New York, as Successor of the Board of Estimate and Apportionment of The City of New York, and Almerindo Portfolio, as Treasurer of the Department of Finance of The City of New York, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1938-12-16
Citations: 255 A.D. 994
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Application of John H. Meehan and Others, Respondents, for an Order against Joseph D. McGoldrick, as Comptroller of the City of New York and as Successor of Frank J. Taylor, Fiorello H. LaGuardia, as Mayor, and Others, Constituting the Board of Estimate of the City of New York, and The Board of Estimate of The City of New York, as Successor of the Board of Estimate and Apportionment of The City of New York, and Almerindo Portfolio, as Treasurer of the Department of Finance of The City of New York, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 255
Pages: 994–994

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Application of John H. Meehan and Others, Respondents, for an Order against Joseph D. McGoldrick, as Comptroller of the City of New York and as Successor of Frank J. Taylor, Fiorello H. LaGuardia, as Mayor, and Others, Constituting the Board of Estimate of the City of New York, and The Board of Estimate of The City of New York, as Successor of the Board of Estimate and Apportionment of The City of New York, and Almerindo Portfolio, as Treasurer of the Department of Finance of The City of New York, Appellants.

Opinion:
Appeal by defendants from a final order granting an application of the petitioners, employed in the County Court of Bongs county, for an order under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, directing the defendants to include in the budget of the city of New York for the year 1938 and the first half of 1939 appropriations in an amount fixed by the county clerk of Kings county as the petitioners' salaries for the said period instead of a lesser amount previously fixed by the city appropriating agencies. Final order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (Matter of Wingate v. Taylor, 166 Misc. 13; affd. sub nom. Matter of People ex rel. Wingate v. Taylor, 254 App. Div. 749; affd. sub nom. Matter of Wingate v. McGoldrick, 279 N. Y. 246; Matter of Hetherington v. Taylor, 254 App. Div. 859; Matter of Rosenthal v. McGoldrick, Id. 859. See Matter of Tevlin v. McGoldrick, post, p. 994, decided herewith.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ.