Case Name: Gerald William DICKERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1973-11-23
Citations: 285 So. 2d 699
Docket Number: No. 72-1042
Parties: Gerald William DICKERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: OWEN, C. J., and WALDEN and CROSS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 285
Pages: 699–699

Head Matter:
Gerald William DICKERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 72-1042.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Nov. 23, 1973.
Rehearing Denied Dec. 17, 1973.
Kenneth A. Studstill, of Twyford & Studstill, Titusville, for appellant, and Gerald William Dickerson, in pro. per.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Thomas M. Carney, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
On the basis of our review of the briefs and record on appeal, we are of the opinion that the motion for post-conviction relief contains sufficient allegations to entitle appellant to an evidentiary hearing under Rule 3.850, FRCrP, 33 F.S.A., on the issue of insanity at the time of trial, as such allegation is not conclusively refuted by the record. Blackman v. State, 256 So.2d 18 (Fla.App.1971). See also Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). Cf. Fast v. State, 221 So.2d 203 (Fla.App.1969);. Estrella v. State, 215 So.2d 489 (Fla.App.1968); Thomas v. State, 210 So.2d 488 (Fla.App.1968); Estevez v. State, 206 So.2d 697 (Fla.App. 1968); Marti v. State, 163 So.2d 506 (Fla.App.1964); and Sampson v. State, 158 So.2d 771 (Fla.App.1963).
Accordingly, the order appealed is reversed and the cause is remanded to grant an evidentiary hearing.
OWEN, C. J., and WALDEN and CROSS, JJ., concur.