Case Name: Vicki A. LINDSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HIGHWOODS REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; HRLP NC VA, L.P.; Highwoods Properties, Inc.; Western Industries-South, LLC; John Doe # 1, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-05-28
Citations: 521 F. App'x 203
Docket Number: No. 12-2527
Parties: Vicki A. LINDSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HIGHWOODS REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; HRLP NC VA, L.P.; Highwoods Properties, Inc.; Western Industries-South, LLC; John Doe # 1, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 521
Pages: 203–203

Head Matter:
Vicki A. LINDSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HIGHWOODS REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; HRLP NC VA, L.P.; Highwoods Properties, Inc.; Western Industries-South, LLC; John Doe # 1, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 12-2527.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 23, 2013.
Decided: May 28, 2013.
Vicki A. Lindsey, Appellant Pro Se. Alison Wright Feehan, Kutak Rock, LLP, Richmond, Virginia; Janeen Beth Koch, Kalbaugh, Pfund & Messersmith, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Vicki A. Lindsey appeals from the district court's orders denying her three separate Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motions seeking reconsideration of the district court's order granting summary judgment for the Defendants in her action alleging premises liability and negligent application of a banned substance. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lindsey v. Highwoods Realty Ltd. P'ship, No. 3:ll-cv-00447-HEH-DJN (E.D.Va. Dec. 5, 2012, Jan. 3, 2013, & Jan. 31, 2013). We deny Lindsey's motion to supplement the record on appeal and her motion to recuse several judges of this court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.