Case Name: Michael DIPIETRO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. FIRST ALLIED SECURITIES, INC., Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-10-27
Citations: 669 F. App'x 927
Docket Number: No. 14-16913
Parties: Michael DIPIETRO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. FIRST ALLIED SECURITIES, INC., Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before: GRABER and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT, District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 669
Pages: 927–928

Head Matter:
Michael DIPIETRO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. FIRST ALLIED SECURITIES, INC., Respondent-Appellee.
No. 14-16913
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted October 17, 2016 San Francisco, California
Filed October 27, 2016
Marie Claire Mirch, Esquire, Attorney, Kevin J. Mirch, Attorney, Mirch Law Firm LLP, San Diego, NV, for Petitioner-Appellant
Edwin Allen Barkel, Esquire, Attorney, Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP, Phoenix, AZ, Michael Schwartzberg, Win-get Spadafora & Schwartzberg LLP, New York, NY, for Respondent-Appellee
Before: GRABER and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT, District Judge.
The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Michael DiPietro appeals the district court's order denying DiPietro's petition to vacate or modify the arbitration award and confirming the arbitration award. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court's decision to confirm an arbitration award. New Regency Prods., Inc. v. Nippon Herald Films, Inc., 501 F.3d 1101, 1105 (9th Cir. 2007). We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its Order filed on October 1, 2014.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.