Case Name: Precious Scarborough, Appellant, v. Federated Department Stores, Inc., et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2012-02-14
Citations: 92 A.D.3d 752
Docket Number: 
Parties: Precious Scarborough, Appellant, v Federated Department Stores, Inc., et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 92
Pages: 752–753

Head Matter:
Precious Scarborough, Appellant, v Federated Department Stores, Inc., et al., Respondents.
[938 NYS2d 804]

Opinion:
Contrary to the plaintiffs contention, the jury verdict on the issue of damages finding that she sustained no damages for future pain and suffering and future medical expenses was based on a fair interpretation of the evidence and, thus, was not contrary to the weight of the evidence (see Lolik v Big V Supermarkets, 86 NY2d 744 [1995]; Querin v Scotti, 89 AD3d 713 [2011]; DeVito v Oi Ying Ho, 25 AD3d 750, 752 [2006]; Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129, 134 [1985]). Mastro, A.PJ., Angiolillo, Eng and Cohen, JJ., concur.