Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tyler Dwayne WADDLE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-01-09
Citations: 708 F. App'x 634
Docket Number: No. 17-12022 Non-Argument Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tyler Dwayne WADDLE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILSON, JORDAN and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 708
Pages: 634–635

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tyler Dwayne WADDLE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 17-12022 Non-Argument Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
(January 9, 2018)
Peter J. Sholl, U.S. Attorney Service— Middle District of Florida, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Nicole Valdes Hardin, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Tampa, FL, Donna Lee Elm, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Orlando, FL, for Defendant-Appellant
Tyler Dwayne Waddle, Pro Se
Before WILSON, JORDAN and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Robert Godfrey, appointed counsel for Tyler Waddle in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Waddle's conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.