Case Name: Jose FERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-09-18
Citations: 825 So. 2d 1061
Docket Number: No. 3D01-2641
Parties: Jose FERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GREEN and RAMIREZ, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 825
Pages: 1061–1061

Head Matter:
Jose FERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D01-2641.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Sept. 18, 2002.
Jose Fernandez, in proper person.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Meredith L. Balo, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GREEN and RAMIREZ, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
After an evidentiary hearing, the trial court denied the defendant's claim for post-conviction relief on the asserted ground of ineffectiveness of trial counsel. The order is affirmed on the basis of the trial court's comprehensive, well-reasoned and well-supported order. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); Anderson v. State, 467 So.2d 781 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), pet. for review dismissed, 475 So.2d 693 (Fla.1985).