Case Name: VICTOR VINCENT KIENTZ, Respondent, v. ARTHUR O'DELL HARRIS, Appellant
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1953-05-15
Citations: 117 Cal. App. 2d 810
Docket Number: Civ. No. 8417
Parties: VICTOR VINCENT KIENTZ, Respondent, v. ARTHUR O’DELL HARRIS, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports, Second Series
Volume: 117
Pages: 810–811

Head Matter:
256 P.2d 995]
[Civ. No. 8417.
Third Dist.
May 15, 1953.]
VICTOR VINCENT KIENTZ, Respondent, v. ARTHUR O’DELL HARRIS, Appellant.
Hoge & Fenton, Verne Summers and Bronson, Bronson & McKinnon for Appellant.
C. Ray Robinson for Respondent.

Opinion:
VAN DYKE, P. J.
In Kientz v. Harris, 3 Civil No. 8418 (ante, p. 787 [257 P.2d 41]) we held that upon the facts stated the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction in this court to entertain the same. Motion to dismiss this appeal has been made upon the same ground. The facts in each case as to jurisdiction are identical. There is no need, therefore, to file an extended opinion herein.
Upon the authority of that case, the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal herein is dismissed.
Peek, J., and Sehottky, J., concurred.