Case Name: George Barrett, as Administrator of the Estate of Camille Barrett, Deceased, et al., Appellants, v. Kasco Construction Co., Inc., Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1982-06-08
Citations: 56 N.Y.2d 830
Docket Number: 
Parties: George Barrett, as Administrator of the Estate of Camille Barrett, Deceased, et al., Appellants, v Kasco Construction Co., Inc., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 56
Pages: 830–832

Head Matter:
George Barrett, as Administrator of the Estate of Camille Barrett, Deceased, et al., Appellants, v Kasco Construction Co., Inc., Respondent.
Decided June 8, 1982
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Andrew M. Harrison and Morris J. Eisen for appellants.
Leo Rothbard for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed, with costs. We cannot say, as a matter of law, that the Appellate Division abused its discretion by deeming defendant's answer amended to include the affirmative defense of res judicata on a motion for summary judgment. Furthermore, although the prior judgment of Supreme Court does not specifically recite that it is "on the merits", that judgment should be given res judicata effect in order to prevent the plaintiff from circumventing the preclusion decree (cf. Palmer v Fox, 28 AD2d 968, affd 22 NY2d 667).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.