Case Name: Dorothea Nagle, respondent, v. Harry Conard et al., appellants
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1912-06-20
Citations: 80 N.J. Eq. 253
Docket Number: 
Parties: Dorothea Nagle, respondent, v. Harry Conard et al., appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 80
Pages: 253–253

Head Matter:
Dorothea Nagle, respondent, v. Harry Conard et al., appellants.
[Argued March 7th, 1912.
Decided June 20th, 1912.]
On appeal from -a decree of the court of chancery advised by Yiee-Chaneellor Howell, whose opinion is reported in 79 N. J. Eq. (9 Buch.) 124.
Mr. Frank J. Iliggins, Mr. Thomas Brown and Messrs. Woodbridge & March> for the respondent.
Mr. Adrian Lyon, for the appellants.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Yice-Chancellor Howell.
' For affirmance—The Ci-iiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Kalisoh, Bogert, Ykedenburgei, Vroom, Congdon, White, Treacy—15.
For reversal—Hone.