Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ismael MAYA-PIZANO, AKA Ismael Maya Pizano, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-10-17
Citations: 699 F. App'x 629
Docket Number: No. 17-10130
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ismael MAYA-PIZANO, AKA Ismael Maya Pizano, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, REINHARDT, and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 699
Pages: 629–629

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ismael MAYA-PIZANO, AKA Ismael Maya Pizano, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 17-10130
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted October 12, 2017 San Francisco, California
Filed October 17, 2017
Katherine Lydon, Assistant U.S. Attorney, USSAC—Office of the US Attorney, Sacramento, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Noa Eva Oren, FPDCA—Federal Public Defender’s Office (Sacramento) Sacramento, CA, for Defendant-Appellant
Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, REINHARDT, and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
The Honorable Kathleen M. O'Malley, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Ismael Maya-Pizano appealed the district court's sentence prior to our decision in United States v. Martinez-Lopez, 864 F.3d 1034 (9th Cir. 2017). Maya-Pizano concedes that Martinez-Lopez forecloses his appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the sentence.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.