Case Name: FONAR CORPORATION, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Dr. Edward L. EYERMAN, Jr., Defendant/Appellant, and Mid-Western Medical Leasing of St. Louis, Inc., Intervenor/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-11-14
Citations: 910 S.W.2d 772
Docket Number: No. 67180
Parties: FONAR CORPORATION, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Dr. Edward L. EYERMAN, Jr., Defendant/Appellant, and Mid-Western Medical Leasing of St. Louis, Inc., Intervenor/Appellant.
Judges: Before AHRENS, P. J., and PUDLOWSKI and GRIMM, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 910
Pages: 772–773

Head Matter:
FONAR CORPORATION, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Dr. Edward L. EYERMAN, Jr., Defendant/Appellant, and Mid-Western Medical Leasing of St. Louis, Inc., Intervenor/Appellant.
No. 67180.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Nov. 14, 1995.
Anthony G. Tumminello, Tumminello & Associates, St. Louis, for appellant.
Rollin J. Moerschel, V. Scott Williams, St. Charles, for respondent.
Before AHRENS, P. J., and PUDLOWSKI and GRIMM, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
In this court tried ease, defendant and intervenor appeal from the trial court's judgment in favor of plaintiff on all counts. Plaintiff sued defendant on a promissory note signed by defendant. Defendant counterclaimed and appellant Mid-Western Medical Leasing intervened, both claiming defendant should be released from the promissory note and an additional $30,000 paid to plaintiff by intervenor should be returned.
The trial court's judgment in this case is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence.' Murphy v. Carrón, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). A written opinion would have no precedential value and would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information explaining the reasons for this order. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in compliance with Rule 84.16(b).