Case Name: RICHARD SZCZAPA v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., ET AL.
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 2004-02-24
Citations: 267 Conn. 666
Docket Number: SC 16942
Parties: RICHARD SZCZAPA v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., ET AL.
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 267
Pages: 666–667

Head Matter:
RICHARD SZCZAPA v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., ET AL.
(SC 16942)
Borden, Norcott, Katz, Vertefeuille and Zarella, Js.
Argued January 15
—officially released February 24, 2004
Neil Johnson, for the appellant (plaintiff).
Karen K. Clark, with whom, on the brief, was Richard J. Kenny, for the appellee (named defendant).

Opinion:
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
The plaintiff, Richard Szczapa, appeals, following our grant of certification, from the order of the Appellate Court granting the motion of the named defendant, United Parcel Service, Inc., to dismiss the appeal of the plaintiff from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the named defendant. We granted the plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal limited to the following issue: "Did the Appellate Court properly dismiss this appeal?" Szczapa v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 262 Conn. 952, 817 A.2d 111 (2003).
After examining the entire record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted.
The appeal is dismissed.