Case Name: One Ten West Fortieth Associates, Respondent, v. Isabel Ardee, Inc., et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2015-01-22
Citations: 124 A.D.3d 500
Docket Number: 
Parties: One Ten West Fortieth Associates, Respondent, v Isabel Ardee, Inc., et al., Appellants.
Judges: Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Renwick, DeGrasse, Manzanet-Daniels and Gische, JJ.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 124
Pages: 500–500

Head Matter:
One Ten West Fortieth Associates, Respondent, v Isabel Ardee, Inc., et al., Appellants.
[998 NYS2d 620] —

Opinion:
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen A. Rakower, J.), entered March 3, 2014, awarding plaintiff landlord the total sum of $46,437.23 against both defendants and further awarding plaintiff the total sum of $19,671.72 against defendant tenant Isabel Ardee, Inc., unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order (same court and Justice), entered February 24, 2014, which granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, and denied defendants' cross motion for summary judgment, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment.
The parties' actions, which included tenant taking possession, landlord cashing the security deposit, and tenant making authorized renovations to the premises, all sufficiently evidenced the parties' intent to convey an interest in the real estate sufficient to constitute "delivery" (219 Broadway Corp. v Alexander's, Inc., 46 NY2d 506, 511-512 [1979]). Given that the lease was valid, tenant was liable for the unpaid rent sought. Further, pursuant to the express terms of the guaranty, guarantor was liable for attorney's fees for this action.
Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Renwick, DeGrasse, Manzanet-Daniels and Gische, JJ.