Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jay Emmitt BAKER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-02-14
Citations: 410 F. App'x 646
Docket Number: No. 10-6783
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jay Emmitt BAKER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 410
Pages: 646–646

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jay Emmitt BAKER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-6783.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 27, 2011.
Decided: Feb. 14, 2011.
Jay Emmitt Baker, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jay Emmitt Baker appeals the district court's order denying his motion to reconsider the court's order denying his motion to compel the Government to file a Fed. R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion for a reduction in sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Baker, No. 4:07-cr-00642-TLW-l (D.S.C. Nov. 16, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.