Case Name: Creditanstalt Investment Bank AG et al., Appellants, v. Chadbourne & Parke LLP, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2007-04-03
Citations: 39 A.D.3d 201
Docket Number: 
Parties: Creditanstalt Investment Bank AG et al., Appellants, v Chadbourne & Parke LLP, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 39
Pages: 201–203

Head Matter:
First Department,
April, 2007
(April 3, 2007)
Creditanstalt Investment Bank AG et al., Appellants, v Chadbourne & Parke LLP, Respondent.
[831 NYS2d 705]

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara R. Kapnick, J.), entered November 23, 2005, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, declared that plaintiffs waived the attorney-client privilege as to legal advice they received regarding compliance of their Russian operation with Russian tax laws and licensure requirements, affirmed, without costs.
Defendant sufficiently demonstrated that the advice it gave in the course of its allegedly negligent representation was framed, in this malpractice action, as the sole cause of plaintiffs' injury in Russia. Invasion of the attorney-client privilege is necessary, under these circumstances, to determine the validity of such claims, and is vital to the defense (see Orco Bank v Proteinas Del Pacifico, 179 AD2d 390 [1992]).
We have considered plaintiffs' remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Williams, Catterson and Malone, JJ.