Case Name: In re ARNOLD R. et al.
Court: Maine Supreme Judicial Court
Jurisdiction: Maine
Decision Date: 1984-07-05
Citations: 477 A.2d 737
Docket Number: 
Parties: In re ARNOLD R. et al.
Judges: Before McKUSICK, C.J., and NICHOLS, ROBERTS, WATHEN, GLASSMAN and SCOLNIK, JJ.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 477
Pages: 737–737

Head Matter:
In re ARNOLD R. et al.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.
Argued June 6, 1984.
Decided July 5, 1984.
Robert Marks (orally), Coopers Mills, for appellant Willard R.
James Eastman Smith, Asst. Atty. Gen. (orally), Augusta, for appellee.
Stephen Hayes (orally), Augusta, Guardian ad litem.
Before McKUSICK, C.J., and NICHOLS, ROBERTS, WATHEN, GLASSMAN and SCOLNIK, JJ.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
In this appeal the father of Arnold R. and three other children challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the District Court findings in terminating his parental rights pursuant to 22 M.R.S.A. § 4055(1)(B)(2) (Supp.1983-1984). After independently reviewing the District Court record, we conclude that the Court's findings are rationally supported by clear and convincing evidence. See In Re Merton R., 466 A.2d 1268, 1269 (Me.1983).
The entry is:
Judgment affirmed.
All concurring.