Case Name: James McFARLAND, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2008-06-10
Citations: 254 S.W.3d 910
Docket Number: No. ED 90568
Parties: James McFARLAND, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 254
Pages: 910–911

Head Matter:
James McFARLAND, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 90568.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
June 10, 2008.
Gwenda R. Robinson, District Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Shaun J. Maekelprang, Roger W. Johnson, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, James McFarland, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).