Case Name: OREGONIANS IN ACTION, Petitioner, v. LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION, Respondent, and McKAY CREEK VALLEY ASSOCIATION, Intervenor
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1997-03-26
Citations: 147 Or. App. 342
Docket Number: CAA91720
Parties: OREGONIANS IN ACTION, Petitioner, v. LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION, Respondent, and McKAY CREEK VALLEY ASSOCIATION, Intervenor.
Judges: Before Riggs, Presiding Judge, and Landau and Leeson, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 147
Pages: 342–343

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted February 24,
reversed and remanded March 26, 1997
OREGONIANS IN ACTION, Petitioner, v. LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION, Respondent, and McKAY CREEK VALLEY ASSOCIATION, Intervenor.
(CAA91720)
936 P2d 372
David J. Hunnicutt argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.
Stephanie L. Striffler, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.
F. Blair Batson argued the cause and filed the brief for intervenor.
Before Riggs, Presiding Judge, and Landau and Leeson, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Petitioner seeks review of an enforcement order of the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) that required Washington County to apply provisions of OAR 660-33-120, -130, and -135 to applications for dwellings in conjunction with farm use. Those rules have been declared invalid in respects that are dispositive here. Lane County v. LCDC, 138 Or App 635, 644-45, 910 P2d 414, adhered to 140 Or App 368, 914 P2d 1114, rev allowed 324 Or 305 (1996). We therefore reverse the enforcement order and remand for reconsideration in the light of Lane County. Petitioner makes two other assignments of error that assert alternate grounds for reversal. We have reviewed those assignments of error and hold them to be without merit.
Reversed and remanded.