Case Name: Vincenzo Piscopo, Respondent, v. National Dry Dock and Repair Company, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1925-03
Citations: 213 A.D. 836
Docket Number: 
Parties: Vincenzo Piscopo, Respondent, v. National Dby Dock and Repaib Company, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 213
Pages: 836–836

Head Matter:
Vincenzo Piscopo, Respondent, v. National Dby Dock and Repaib Company, Appellant.

Opinion:
Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. The technical error in charging the comparative negligence rule was harmless, as there was no evidence upon which a finding of contributory negligence could have been based. (Amato v. New York & Porto Rico Steamship Co., 209 App. Div. 882.) Present—Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Kelby and Young, JJ.