Case Name: Elijah DOLAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-01-09
Citations: 212 F. App'x 191
Docket Number: No. 06-1212
Parties: Elijah DOLAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 212
Pages: 191–191

Head Matter:
Elijah DOLAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 06-1212.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 27, 2006.
Decided: Jan. 9, 2007.
Roger D. Forman, Forman & Huber, L.C., Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. Donna L. Calvert, Regional Chief Counsel, William B. Reeser, Supervisory Regional Counsel, Joyce M.J. Gordon, Assistant Regional Counsel, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Charles T. Miller, Acting United States Attorney, Carol A. Casto, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Elijah Dolan appeals the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's report and affirming the Commissioner's denial of disability insurance benefits. We must uphold the decision to deny benefits if the decision is supported by substantial evidence and the correct law was applied. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2000); Craig v. Chater, 76 F.3d 585, 589 (4th Cir.1996). We have thoroughly reviewed the administrative record and the parties' briefs and find no reversible error. Accordingly, vre affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Dolan v. Barnhart, No. 2:03-0208 (S.D.W.Va. Jan. 5, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.