Case Name: Irving Bauer, Plaintiff, v. 873 45th Street Corp. et al., Defendants. (Action No. 1.); 873 45th Street Corp., Appellant, v. Irving Bauer, Individually and Doing Business as B. B. Management Company, Respondent. (Action No. 2.)
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1982-12-06
Citations: 91 A.D.2d 600
Docket Number: 
Parties: Irving Bauer, Plaintiff, v 873 45th Street Corp. et al., Defendants. (Action No. 1.) 873 45th Street Corp., Appellant, v Irving Bauer, Individually and Doing Business as B. B. Management Company, Respondent. (Action No. 2.)
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 91
Pages: 600–600

Head Matter:
Second Department,
December, 1982
(December 6, 1982)
Irving Bauer, Plaintiff, v 873 45th Street Corp. et al., Defendants. (Action No. 1.) 873 45th Street Corp., Appellant, v Irving Bauer, Individually and Doing Business as B. B. Management Company, Respondent. (Action No. 2.)

Opinion:
— Appeal by 873 45th Street Corporation from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bellard, J.), dated May 20,1982, which denied its motion to vacate a conditional order of preclusion and to compel Irving Bauer to accept its bill of particulars. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Appellant failed to set forth facts showing either a meritorious cause of action or that its inordinate delay in moving to vacate its default was excusable (see Barash v Micucci, 49 NY2d 594; Abramowitz v Berger, 20 AD2d 903; Pakula v Rodin, 66 AD2d 658). Weinstein, J. P., Gulotta, Niehoff and Rubin, JJ., concur.