Case Name: The Union Square Bank of the City of New York, Resp't, v. Theodor Reichmann, Impl'd, App'lt
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1893-05-12
Citations: 53 N.Y. St. Rep. 352
Docket Number: 
Parties: The Union Square Bank of the City of New York, Resp't, v. Theodor Reichmann, Impl’d, App’lt.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 53
Pages: 352–353

Head Matter:
The Union Square Bank of the City of New York, Resp't, v. Theodor Reichmann, Impl’d, App’lt.
(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department,
Filed May 12, 1893.)
Appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate a warrant of attachment.
A. W. Kent, for app’lt; Fromme Bros., for resp’t

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The order appealed from should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, for the reasons stated in the opinion in the case of Hanover Nat. Bank v. Stebbins (decided herewith.)
Van Brunt, P. J., and Follett, J., concur.