Case Name: In the Matter of the Compensation of Gayle J. Williams, Claimant. SAIF CORPORATION and Southcoast Lumber Co., Petitioners, v. Gayle J. WILLIAMS, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1993-10-20
Citations: 124 Or. App. 203
Docket Number: 91-10443; CA A76540
Parties: In the Matter of the Compensation of Gayle J. Williams, Claimant. SAIF CORPORATION and Southcoast Lumber Co., Petitioners, v. Gayle J. WILLIAMS, Respondent.
Judges: Before Rossman, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Leeson, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 124
Pages: 203–204

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted April 23,
reversed as to attorney fees; affirmed as to penalty October 20, 1993,
reconsideration denied January 19,
petition for review pending 1994
In the Matter of the Compensation of Gayle J. Williams, Claimant. SAIF CORPORATION and Southcoast Lumber Co., Petitioners, v. Gayle J. WILLIAMS, Respondent.
(91-10443; CA A76540)
861 P2d 1025
David L. Runner, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for petitioners. On the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Julie K. Bolt, Special Assistant Attorney General.
Edward J. Harri argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Malagon, Moore, Johnson, Jensen & Correll.
Before Rossman, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Leeson, Judges.
PER CURIAM
De Muniz, J., concurring.
Rossman, P. J., dissenting.

Opinion:
De MUNIZ, J.,
concurring.
I agree with the majority for the reasons stated in my concurrence in SAIF v. Allen, 124 Or App 183, 861 P2d 1018 (1993).