Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Isabel Linda WARREN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-07-19
Citations: 235 F. App'x 436
Docket Number: No. 05-50407
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Isabel Linda WARREN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: LEAVY, THOMAS, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 235
Pages: 436–437

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Isabel Linda WARREN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-50407.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 9, 2007 .
Filed July 19, 2007.
Becky S. Walker, Esq., Mark C. Krause, Esq., USLA — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
FPDCA — Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: LEAVY, THOMAS, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Isabel Linda Warren appeals from her guilty-plea conviction and 120-month sen tenee imposed for possession with intent to distribute cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Warren has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Warren did not file a pro se supplemental brief. The government filed notice that it would not be filing an answering brief.
Our review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provid ed by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.