Case Name: William G. DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-02-22
Citations: 21 S.W.3d 864
Docket Number: No. ED 76282
Parties: William G. DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., J„ and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 21
Pages: 864–864

Head Matter:
William G. DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 76282.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Feb. 22, 2000.
Nancy L. Vincent, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen.,. Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., J„ and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, William G. Davis, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).