Case Name: In the Matter of the Claim of Ella McNeill, Appellant. Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York, Respondent. Lillian Roberts, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of the Claim of Dorothy Hauptman, Appellant. Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York, Respondent. Lillian Roberts, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent. (Proceeding No. 2.)
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1983-02-23
Citations: 58 N.Y.2d 959
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Claim of Ella McNeill, Appellant. Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York, Respondent. Lillian Roberts, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of the Claim of Dorothy Hauptman, Appellant. Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York, Respondent. Lillian Roberts, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent. (Proceeding No. 2.)
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 58
Pages: 959–962

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Claim of Ella McNeill, Appellant. Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York, Respondent. Lillian Roberts, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of the Claim of Dorothy Hauptman, Appellant. Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York, Respondent. Lillian Roberts, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent. (Proceeding No. 2.)
Decided February 23, 1983
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Gerald A. Dwyer for appellants.
Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Frederick M. Paola of counsel), for Lillian Roberts, as Industrial Commissioner, respondent.
Frederick A. O. Schwarz, Jr., Corporation Counsel (Fay Leoussis of counsel), for Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York, respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), orders affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (88 AD2d 1050).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons.