Case Name: In re: Rodney H. WILLIAMS, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-06-21
Citations: 186 F. App'x 334
Docket Number: No. 06-6844
Parties: In re: Rodney H. WILLIAMS, Petitioner.
Judges: Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 186
Pages: 334–335

Head Matter:
In re: Rodney H. WILLIAMS, Petitioner.
No. 06-6844.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 15, 2006.
Decided: June 21, 2006.
Rodney H. Williams, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Rodney H. Williams petitions for a writ of error pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) (2000) and Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Williams claims the July 29, 2003, opinion issued in his direct appeal relied upon perjurous statements in the record. Because Williams does not have a right to the relief sought, we deny relief. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of error. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.