Case Name: STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Robert Edward SHAW, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1997-02-12
Citations: 693 So. 2d 582
Docket Number: No. 96-00753
Parties: STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Robert Edward SHAW, Appellee.
Judges: ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and NORTHCUTT, J., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 693
Pages: 582–583

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Robert Edward SHAW, Appellee.
No. 96-00753.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Feb. 12, 1997.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Patricia E. Davenport, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for appellant.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Robert D. Rosen, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for appellee.

Opinion:
BLUE, Judge.
The State appeals the circuit judge's order, entered after trial, declaring section 316.1935(2), Florida Statutes (1995), unconstitutional on the ground of vagueness. Based on the recent authority of State v. Barnes, 686 So.2d 633 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996), we reverse that ruling.
It is not necessary to remand this matter to the trial court for further proceedings. The only matter appealed by the State is addressed by State v. Barnes. Although the trial court entered judgment and sentence on a lesser offense based on its ruling of uneon-stitutionality, the evidence at trial did not support a conviction for the greater offense. Accordingly, we affirm the convictions and sentences as determined and imposed by the trial judge.
Ruling on constitutionality of statute reversed; judgments and sentences affirmed.
ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and NORTHCUTT, J., concur.