Case Name: Jerry Iannucci et al., Respondents, v. Board of Supervisors of the County of Washington, Appellant, and State of New York, Respondent; Saratogian, Inc., et al., Respondents, v. Board of Supervisors of the County of Saratoga, Appellant; State of New York et al., Respondents, and Harry D. Snyder, Jr., as Supervisor of the City, of Saratoga Springs, Intervenor-Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1967-06-01
Citations: 19 N.Y.2d 1014
Docket Number: 
Parties: Jerry Iannucci et al., Respondents, v. Board of Supervisors of the County of Washington, Appellant, and State of New York, Respondent. Saratogian, Inc., et al., Respondents, v. Board of Supervisors of the County of Saratoga, Appellant; State of New York et al., Respondents, and Harry D. Snyder, Jr., as Supervisor of the City, of Saratoga Springs, Intervenor-Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 19
Pages: 1014–1014

Head Matter:
Jerry Iannucci et al., Respondents, v. Board of Supervisors of the County of Washington, Appellant, and State of New York, Respondent. Saratogian, Inc., et al., Respondents, v. Board of Supervisors of the County of Saratoga, Appellant; State of New York et al., Respondents, and Harry D. Snyder, Jr., as Supervisor of the City, of Saratoga Springs, Intervenor-Respondent.
Submitted May 31, 1967;
decided June 1, 1967.

Opinion:
Motion by the Towns of Huntington, Babylon, Brookhaven, Islip and Smithtown for leave to file a brief amici curies, for an order setting the appeals down for reargument and for permission to participate in the reargument granted only to the extent that a brief amici curies may be filed; otherwise, motion denied.