Case Name: HEITMAN PROPERTIES OF MISSOURI, LTD., Appellant, v. THE PASTA HOUSE COMPANY, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-03-14
Citations: 16 S.W.3d 709
Docket Number: No. ED 76071
Parties: HEITMAN PROPERTIES OF MISSOURI, LTD., Appellant, v. THE PASTA HOUSE COMPANY, Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANDALL, P.J. and HOFF, J. and CRIST, S.J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 16
Pages: 709–709

Head Matter:
HEITMAN PROPERTIES OF MISSOURI, LTD., Appellant, v. THE PASTA HOUSE COMPANY, Respondent.
No. ED 76071.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
March 14, 2000.
Rehearing Denied May 10, 2000.
Gallop, Johnson & Newman, L.C., Thomas P. Hohenstein, Joshua M. Avigad, George A. Kiser, St. Louis, for appellant.
James J. Sauter, Stephen B. Evans, Deeba Sauter Herd, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before CRANDALL, P.J. and HOFF, J. and CRIST, S.J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Heitman Properties of Missouri, Ltd. appeals the trial court's judgment and order granting The Pasta House Company's motion for summary judgment.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. Upon de novo review, we find no genuine issue of material fact or error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value.' We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth reasons for our decision. Judgment affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).