Case Name: WILLIAM DAVIS, Appellant, v. RAMIRO M. GOMEZ, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada
Jurisdiction: Nevada
Decision Date: 1976-11-10
Citations: 92 Nev. 629
Docket Number: No. 8513
Parties: WILLIAM DAVIS, Appellant, v. RAMIRO M. GOMEZ, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Nevada Reports
Volume: 92
Pages: 629–629

Head Matter:
WILLIAM DAVIS, Appellant, v. RAMIRO M. GOMEZ, Respondent.
No. 8513
November 10, 1976
555 P.2d 1228
Stanley W. Pierce, Las Vegas, for Appellant.
Earle W. White, Jr., Las Vegas, for Respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION
Per Curiam:
Appellant contends the trial court erred in finding consideration for modification of a written contract. We disagree.
After reviewing the record, we find substantial evidence supporting that finding and, thus, the judgment is affirmed. J & J Building Contractors, Inc. v. Savage Construction, Inc., 92 Nev. 590, 555 P.2d 488 (1976); Holland Livestock v. B & C Enterprises, 92 Nev. 473, 553 P.2d 950 (1976).
Other issues raised by appellant are without merit and we need not consider them.
Affirmed.