Case Name: SAMUEL P. HUNT, RESPONDENT, v. BOROUGH OF HADDON HEIGHTS, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1918-01-31
Citations: 91 N.J.L. 696
Docket Number: 
Parties: SAMUEL P. HUNT, RESPONDENT, v. BOROUGH OF HADDON HEIGHTS, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 91
Pages: 696–696

Head Matter:
SAMUEL P. HUNT, RESPONDENT, v. BOROUGH OF HADDON HEIGHTS, APPELLANT.
Submitted December 10, 1917
Decided January 31, 1918.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 90 N. J. L. 35.
For the respondent, Cyrus D. Marter.
For the appellant, Jess & Rogers.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Garrison in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.