Case Name: Charles SWIFT, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Wadie THOMAS; Matthew Kahler, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-10-21
Citations: 669 F. App'x 814
Docket Number: No. 16-3200
Parties: Charles SWIFT, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Wadie THOMAS; Matthew Kahler, Defendants-Appellees
Judges: Before WOLLMAN, ARNOLD, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 669
Pages: 814–815

Head Matter:
Charles SWIFT, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Wadie THOMAS; Matthew Kahler, Defendants-Appellees
No. 16-3200
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: October 20, 2016
Filed: October 21, 2016
Charles Swift, Pro Se.
Before WOLLMAN, ARNOLD, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Charles Swift appeals after the district court dismissed, without prejudice, his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint requesting that the district court impose directions upon a state-court judge. Upon careful review, and for the reasons stated by the district court, we conclude that the dismissal was proper. See Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) dismissal is reviewed de novo).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska,