Case Name: Bruce LaVINE, as next friend of James LaVINE; James LaVine, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. BLAINE SCHOOL DISTRICT, a municipal corporation; Tim Haney; Dan Newell; Karen Mulholland, Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-01-29
Citations: 279 F.3d 719
Docket Number: No. 00-35303
Parties: Bruce LaVINE, as next friend of James LaVINE; James LaVine, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. BLAINE SCHOOL DISTRICT, a municipal corporation; Tim Haney; Dan Newell; Karen Mulholland, Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: Before: B. FLETCHER and FISHER, Circuit Judges, and SCHWARZER, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 279
Pages: 719–731

Head Matter:
Bruce LaVINE, as next friend of James LaVINE; James LaVine, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. BLAINE SCHOOL DISTRICT, a municipal corporation; Tim Haney; Dan Newell; Karen Mulholland, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 00-35303.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Jan. 29, 2002.
Before: B. FLETCHER and FISHER, Circuit Judges, and SCHWARZER, District Judge.
Honorable William W Schwarzer, Senior District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
Order; Dissent by Judge REINHARDT; Dissent by Judge KLEINFELD
ORDER
The panel has unanimously voted to deny appellees' petition for rehearing filed August 3, 2001. Judge Fisher voted to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc, and Judge Fletcher and Judge Schwarzer recommended rejection of the suggestion for rehearing en banc.
The full court was advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc. An active judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35(b).
The petition for rehearing is denied and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is rejected.