Case Name: Candace Leann DUNCAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2013-12-18
Citations: 128 So. 3d 875
Docket Number: No. 2D12-1840
Parties: Candace Leann DUNCAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: WALLACE and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 128
Pages: 875–875

Head Matter:
Candace Leann DUNCAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D12-1840.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Dec. 18, 2013.
Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and John C. Fisher, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Anne Sheer Weiner, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appel-lee.

Opinion:
KELLY, Judge.
Candace Leann Duncan challenges her conviction and sentence for grand theft from a dwelling. After having carefully reviewed the record in this circumstantial evidence case, we conclude that the State did not meet its burden to offer evidence that was inconsistent with Duncan's reasonable hypothesis of innocence. See State v. Law, 559 So.2d 187, 188 (Fla.1989); Linn v. State, 921 So.2d 830, 834 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). Accordingly, we reverse Duncan's conviction for grand theft and the final judgment of restitution.
Reversed.
WALLACE and BLACK, JJ., Concur.