Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Louis RAMIREZ, III, aka Seal F, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-10-18
Citations: 203 F. App'x 144
Docket Number: No. 05-50825
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Louis RAMIREZ, III, aka Seal F, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: T.G. NELSON, W. FLETCHER and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 203
Pages: 144–144

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Louis RAMIREZ, III, aka Seal F, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-50825.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 16, 2006.
Filed Oct. 18, 2006.
Becky S. Walker, Esq., Ellyn M. Lindsay, Esq., USLA-Office of the U.S. Attorney Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Roger S. Hanson, Esq., Law Offices of Roger S. Hanson, Santa Ana, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: T.G. NELSON, W. FLETCHER and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Louis Ramirez, III, appeals from the restitution order imposed following his conviction for mail and wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2, 1341, 1343 and 2326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Ramirez contends that the district court violated his Sixth Amendment rights by ordering restitution in an amount that exceeded what was supported by the jury's verdict. This contention is foreclosed by United States v. Bussell, 414 F.3d 1048, 1060 (9th Cir.2005) (restitution orders are unaffected by the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005)).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.