Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Bobby D. RIDENOUR, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2014-11-25
Citations: 448 S.W.3d 874
Docket Number: No. ED 100472
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Bobby D. RIDENOUR, Appellant.
Judges: Before Patricia L. Cohen, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Robert M. Clayton III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 448
Pages: 874–874

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Bobby D. RIDENOUR, Appellant.
No. ED 100472
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION FOUR
Filed: November 25, 2014
Amanda Faerber, Assistant Public Defender, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.
Karen Kramer, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.
Before Patricia L. Cohen, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Robert M. Clayton III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Bobby Ridenour (Defendant) appeals the judgment of conviction entered after a jury found him guilty of robbery in the first degree, burglary in the first degree, and two counts of armed criminal action. Defendant claims the trial court erred in accepting the jury's verdict and convicting him of first-degree burglary because the State produced insufficient evidence to establish that Defendant entered the victim's apartment for the purpose of committing the crime of first-degree robbery.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).