Case Name: Marie Schmidt, respondent, v. Albert A. Raphael, trustee, et al., appellants
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1920-10-21
Citations: 92 N.J. Eq. 240
Docket Number: 
Parties: Marie Schmidt, respondent, v. Albert A. Raphael, trustee, et al., appellants.
Judges: For affirmance—Ti-ie Ci-iiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalis ch, Black, Katzenbaci-i, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner—13.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 92
Pages: 240–240

Head Matter:
Marie Schmidt, respondent, v. Albert A. Raphael, trustee, et al., appellants.
[Decided October 21st, 1920.]
On appeal from,,a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Lewis, and reported in 91 N. J. Eq. 386.
Messrs. McDermott & Enright, for the respondent.
Messrs. Dam, Tamblyn & Golyer, for the appellants.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis.
For affirmance—Ti-ie Ci-iiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalis ch, Black, Katzenbaci-i, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner—13.
For reversal—None.