Case Name: WATKINS v. MINTER et al.
Court: Texas Courts of Civil Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1916-02-03
Citations: 184 S.W. 368
Docket Number: No. 968
Parties: WATKINS v. MINTER et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 184
Pages: 368–368

Head Matter:
WATKINS v. MINTER et al.
(No. 968.)
(Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Texarkana.
Feb. 3, 1916.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 16, 1916.)
Appeal from District Court, Hopkins County; R. L. Porter, Judge.
Action by J. C. Watkins against L. B. Minter and others. Erom a judgment for defendants sustaining general demurrer to petition and dismissing the case, plaintiff appealed, and questions presented were certified to the Supreme Court. Questions answered (180 S, W. 227).
Reversed and remanded.
J. H. Beavers and Harris, Suiter & Britton, all of Winnsboro, for appellant. D. Thornton, of Sulphur Springs, for appellees. '

Opinion:
HODGES, J.
This appeal is from a judgment sustaining a general demurrer to the appellant's amended original petition and dismissing the case. The questions presented on appeal were certified to the Supreme Court in April, 1912. They have recently been answered in an opinion which will be found in Watkins v. Minter, 180 S. W. 227. The answer returned necessitates a reversal of the judgment and a remand of the cause, and it will be, accordingly, so ordered. It is unnecessary for us to add anything to what is said in the opinion of the Supreme Court.