Case Name: Kim BROWN; David Brown, H/W, Appellants v. MUHLENBERG TOWNSHIP; Board of Supervisors of Muhlenberg Township; Muhlenberg Township Police Department; Robert M. Flanagan, individually and/or as Chief of Police of Muhlenberg Township; Robert D. Eberly, individually and/or as Patrolman of Muhlenberg Township; Harley Smith, individually and/or as Chief of Police of Muhlenberg Township
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-11-15
Citations: 273 F.3d 390
Docket Number: No. 00-1846
Parties: Kim BROWN; David Brown, H/W, Appellants v. MUHLENBERG TOWNSHIP; Board of Supervisors of Muhlenberg Township; Muhlenberg Township Police Department; Robert M. Flanagan, individually and/or as Chief of Police of Muhlenberg Township; Robert D. Eberly, individually and/or as Patrolman of Muhlenberg Township; Harley Smith, individually and/or as Chief of Police of Muhlenberg Township
Judges: Present: BECKER, Chief Judge, SLOVITER, MANSMANN, SCIRICA, NYGAARD, ALITO, ROTH, McKEE, BARRY, AMBRO, FUENTES, GARTH and STAPLETON , Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 273
Pages: 390–391

Head Matter:
Kim BROWN; David Brown, H/W, Appellants v. MUHLENBERG TOWNSHIP; Board of Supervisors of Muhlenberg Township; Muhlenberg Township Police Department; Robert M. Flanagan, individually and/or as Chief of Police of Muhlenberg Township; Robert D. Eberly, individually and/or as Patrolman of Muhlenberg Township; Harley Smith, individually and/or as Chief of Police of Muhlenberg Township
No. 00-1846.
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Nov. 15, 2001.
Present: BECKER, Chief Judge, SLOVITER, MANSMANN, SCIRICA, NYGAARD, ALITO, ROTH, McKEE, BARRY, AMBRO, FUENTES, GARTH and STAPLETON , Circuit Judges.
As to panel rehearing only.
As to panel rehearing only.

Opinion:
The petition for rehearing filed by ap-pellee. Robert D. Eberly, in the above-entitled case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court and to all the other available circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service, and no judge who concurred in the decision having asked for rehearing, and a majority of the circuit judges of the circuit in regular service not having voted for rehearing, the petition for rehearing by the panel and the Court en banc, is denied.