Case Name: FILTROL CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. The SLICK CORPORATION et al., Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1970-08-04
Citations: 428 F.2d 826
Docket Number: No. 25405
Parties: FILTROL CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. The SLICK CORPORATION et al., Appellants.
Judges: Before CHAMBERS and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges, and POWELL, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 428
Pages: 826–826

Head Matter:
FILTROL CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. The SLICK CORPORATION et al., Appellants.
No. 25405.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Aug. 4, 1970.
Everett B. Clary (argued), of O’Melveny & Myers, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
Moses Lasky (argued), of Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges, and POWELL, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The decision of the district court granting a temporary injunction is affirmed. The provisions seem reasonable as intermediate relief.
We do not reach the question of whether the provisions of the temporary injunction would be appropriate if there ultimately is found to be a violation of the Clayton Act.