Case Name: Leocadie Schaad, Resp't, v. George M. Edebohls, App'lt
Court: New York Superior Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1894-07-02
Citations: 62 N.Y. St. Rep. 873
Docket Number: 
Parties: Leocadie Schaad, Resp’t, v. George M. Edebohls, App’lt.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 62
Pages: 873–873

Head Matter:
Leocadie Schaad, Resp’t, v. George M. Edebohls, App’lt.
Barrington & Shannon, for app’lt; 0. B. Boyd, for resp’t.

Opinion:
Freedman, J.
The complaint states but one cause of action, and it is sufficiently definite and certain. If the defendant had complained of the prolixity and redundancy of the complaint, he might have met with better success. What he real'y sought to obtain was the particulars of certain allegations, and his remedy for that purpose was by motion for a bill of particulars. The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.