Case Name: Giacomo A. TESORIERO, Appellant, v. Kathleen D. TESORIERO, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-01-03
Citations: 665 So. 2d 377
Docket Number: No. 94-3652, 94-3653 and 95-0586
Parties: Giacomo A. TESORIERO, Appellant, v. Kathleen D. TESORIERO, Appellee.
Judges: DELL, FARMER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 665
Pages: 377–378

Head Matter:
Giacomo A. TESORIERO, Appellant, v. Kathleen D. TESORIERO, Appellee.
No. 94-3652, 94-3653 and 95-0586.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jan. 3, 1996.
Giacomo A. Tesonero, pro se.
Kathleen D. Tesonero, pro se.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm both the final judgment of dissolution of marriage and the later order holding appellant in contempt. There is an error, however, in the Income Deduction Order. Although the text of paragraph 1 correctly states that the deduction is to be made biweekly, the calculations at the end of the paragraph incorrectly state weekly. On remand, the trial court shall correct this error.
DELL, FARMER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.