Case Name: Artenio Aguilar BEJAR, aka Artemio Aguilar Teja, aka Antonio Aguilar Bejar, Petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-12-14
Citations: 624 F. App'x 554
Docket Number: No. 13-71508
Parties: Artenio Aguilar BEJAR, aka Artemio Aguilar Teja, aka Antonio Aguilar Bejar, Petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: WALLACE, RAWLINSON, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 624
Pages: 554–554

Head Matter:
Artenio Aguilar BEJAR, aka Artemio Aguilar Teja, aka Antonio Aguilar Bejar, Petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 13-71508.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 9, 2015.
Filed Dec. 14, 2015.
Patricia Vargas, Patricia Vargas & Associates, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.
Charles S. Greene, Oil, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
Before: WALLACE, RAWLINSON, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Artenio Aguilar Bejar, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge's decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to consider Aguilar Bejar's due process claim because it is procedural in nature and he failed to raise it to the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.