Case Name: Gamil R. HANNA, individually, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF HOLLYWOOD, FLORIDA, Alfred Stabile, individually, Patrick Floyd, individually, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-06-04
Citations: 481 F. App'x 475
Docket Number: No. 11-13589
Parties: Gamil R. HANNA, individually, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF HOLLYWOOD, FLORIDA, Alfred Stabile, individually, Patrick Floyd, individually, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before TJOFLAT, BARKETT and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 481
Pages: 475–475

Head Matter:
Gamil R. HANNA, individually, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF HOLLYWOOD, FLORIDA, Alfred Stabile, individually, Patrick Floyd, individually, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 11-13589
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
June 4, 2012.
David M. Goldstein, Ergio I. Fernandez, David M. Goldstein, PA, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Tracy Ann Lyons, Office of the City Attorney, Hollywood, FL, Daniel L. Abbott, Daniel A. Seigel, Weiss Serota Helf-man Pastoriza Cole & Boniske, PL, Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Defendants-Appel-lees.
Before TJOFLAT, BARKETT and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Gamil R. Hanna appeals the district court's order of July 5, 2011, denying his motion to vacate the district court's order of February 22, 2011, dismissing his second amended complaint and to reopen the case. The issue for this court to decide is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying Hanna's motion to vacate. We conclude that the district court did not and therefore affirm.
AFFIRMED.