Case Name: Terrance RUTTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1997-08-27
Citations: 698 So. 2d 1304
Docket Number: No. 95-3712
Parties: Terrance RUTTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: DELL and STEVENSON, JJ., and MUIR, CELESTE H., Associate Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 698
Pages: 1304–1304

Head Matter:
Terrance RUTTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 95-3712.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Aug. 27, 1997.
Rehearing Denied Oct. 7, 1997.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Margaret Good-Earnest, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carol Cobourn Asbury, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm. The trial court did not err when it denied appellant's request for additional peremptory challenges after it denied his challenges of four jurors for cause. See Farina v. State, 679 So.2d 1151 (Fla.1996). The admission of witness Marian Demario's testimony constituted, at most, harmless error in light of the cumulative evidence presented at trial. See Heuss v. State, 660 So.2d 1052, 1057 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), approved, 687 So.2d 823 (Fla.1996). Finally, appellant's argument that the trial court erred in admitting statements by the victims is without merit. See Denny v. State, 617 So.2d 323, 325 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993).
AFFIRMED.
DELL and STEVENSON, JJ., and MUIR, CELESTE H., Associate Judge, concur.