Case Name: In re RICOH COMPANY, LTD. PATENT LITIGATION. Synopsys, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ricoh Company, Ltd., Defendant-Appellant; Ricoh Company, Ltd., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Aeroflex Incorporated, Ami Semiconductor, Inc., Matrox Electronic Systems, Ltd., Matrox Graphics, Inc., Matrox International, Inc., Matrox Tech, Inc., and Aeroflex Colorado Springs, Inc., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-03-18
Citations: 413 F. App'x 277
Docket Number: No. 2011-1199
Parties: In re RICOH COMPANY, LTD. PATENT LITIGATION. Synopsys, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ricoh Company, Ltd., Defendant-Appellant. Ricoh Company, Ltd., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Aeroflex Incorporated, Ami Semiconductor, Inc., Matrox Electronic Systems, Ltd., Matrox Graphics, Inc., Matrox International, Inc., Matrox Tech, Inc., and Aeroflex Colorado Springs, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 413
Pages: 277–278

Head Matter:
In re RICOH COMPANY, LTD. PATENT LITIGATION. Synopsys, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ricoh Company, Ltd., Defendant-Appellant. Ricoh Company, Ltd., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Aeroflex Incorporated, Ami Semiconductor, Inc., Matrox Electronic Systems, Ltd., Matrox Graphics, Inc., Matrox International, Inc., Matrox Tech, Inc., and Aeroflex Colorado Springs, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 2011-1199.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
March 18, 2011.

Opinion:
ON MOTION
ORDER
The parties jointly move for a stay of the briefing schedule until after this Court issues its decision in the' related appeal (2010-1415), concerning the district court's grant of summary judgment of noninfringement.
We note that the court's decision in 2010-1415 issued on March 8, 2011.
Accordingly,
It Is Ordered That:
The motion is granted to the extent that the appellant's opening brief is due within 60 days of the date of filing of this order.