Case Name: MARY IRENE BALDIE, Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION (a Corporation) et al., Respondents
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1950-05-18
Citations: 97 Cal. App. 2d 614
Docket Number: Civ. No. 14350
Parties: MARY IRENE BALDIE, Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION (a Corporation) et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports, Second Series
Volume: 97
Pages: 614–614

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 14350.
First Dist., Div. Two.
May 18, 1950.]
MARY IRENE BALDIE, Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION (a Corporation) et al., Respondents.
(See former opinion in this case, 97 Cal.App.2d 70, 217 P.2d 111.)
Jonathan H. Rowell for Appellant.
Frank V. Kington for Respondents.

Opinion:
THE COURT.
Counsel have asked us to clarify the apportionment of costs on the two appeals. Under the Rules on Appeal (rule 26(a)) the prevailing party is entitled to his costs. These appeals were presented on one clerk's and one reporter's transcript and one set of briefs. However the pleadings, evidence and arguments are separate. Respondent Pacheco is entitled to costs against appellant on his appeal and appellant is entitled to costs on the Bullock appeal. The costs should be apportioned on the basis of the portions of the transcripts and briefs devoted to each case.