Case Name: Nathan HAWKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-08-12
Citations: 116 S.W.3d 660
Docket Number: No. ED 82030
Parties: Nathan HAWKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, C.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J. and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 116
Pages: 660–660

Head Matter:
Nathan HAWKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 82030.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Southern Division.
Aug. 12, 2003.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Sept. 24, 2003.
Nancy A. McKerrow, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Adriane Dixon Crouse, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, C.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J. and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Nathan Hawkins appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the determination of the motion court is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would be of no precedential value. We affirm the judgment for the reasons set forth in the motion court's comprehensive findings of fact and conclusions of law. Rule 84.16(b).