Case Name: William E. Uptegrove et al., Respondents, v. The Central Railroad Co. of New Jersey, Appellant
Court: New York City Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1895-11
Citations: 14 Misc. 460
Docket Number: 
Parties: William E. Uptegrove et al., Respondents, v. The Central Railroad Co. of New Jersey, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 14
Pages: 460–460

Head Matter:
William E. Uptegrove et al., Respondents, v. The Central Railroad Co. of New Jersey, Appellant.
(City Court of New York
General Term,
November, 1895.)
Where each, side moves for a direction of a verdict in his favor, this constitutes a submission of the law and facts to the court for its. determination. . "
Appeal from judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, entered upon a. verdict directed by ,the court.
I)e Borest^Brothers, for appellant. ''
M.'P. O' Gonnor, for .respondent. >'

Opinion:
McOabthy, J.
Both sides having moved for á direction of a verdict, left the question of law and fact to the trial, justice'to determine.
We have examined the facts vei'y carefully and under Park v. Preston, 108 N. Y. 434, 487, think the judgment should be .affirmed, and, so ordered, with costs. See Jennings v. Grand Trunk Railway of Ganada, 127 N. Y. 449.
Fitzsimons, J., concurs:
judgment affirmed, with costs.