Case Name: Edward J. Fuchs, complainant. v. M. Casewell Heine, as receiver, &c., et al., defendants
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1923-10-17
Citations: 97 N.J. Eq. 548
Docket Number: 
Parties: Edward J. Fuchs, complainant. v. M. Casewell Heine, as receiver, &c., et al., defendants.
Judges: For affirmance—Ti-ie Chiee-Justioe, Trenohard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 15.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 97
Pages: 548–552

Head Matter:
Edward J. Fuchs, complainant. v. M. Casewell Heine, as receiver, &c., et al., defendants.
[Decided October 17th, 1923.]
Mr. Otto A. Siiefel, for the appellant.
Messrs. Bilder & Bilder and Mr. M. Gasewell Seine, for the respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the oiiinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Church.
For affirmance—Ti-ie Chiee-Justioe, Trenohard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 15.
For reversal—None.