Case Name: Sheridan A. GLAZE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rueben Voll GREENE, Attorney; David Lassiter, Jr., Attorney, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-07-06
Citations: 438 F. App'x 224
Docket Number: No. 11-6478
Parties: Sheridan A. GLAZE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rueben Voll GREENE, Attorney; David Lassiter, Jr., Attorney, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 438
Pages: 224–225

Head Matter:
Sheridan A. GLAZE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rueben Voll GREENE, Attorney; David Lassiter, Jr., Attorney, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 11-6478.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 30, 2011.
Decided: July 6, 2011.
Sheridan A. Glaze, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Sheridan A. Glaze appeals the district court's order denying relief on her complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Glaze v. Greene, No. 1:11-cv-00286-LO-TRJ (E.D.Va. Mar. 24, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.