Case Name: HAVERHILL BOX BOARD CO., Respondent, v. COY, HUNT & CO., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1905-11-24
Citations: 95 N.Y.S. 1134
Docket Number: 
Parties: HAVERHILL BOX BOARD CO., Respondent, v. COY, HUNT & CO., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 95
Pages: 1134–1135

Head Matter:
HAVERHILL BOX BOARD CO., Respondent, v. COY, HUNT & CO., Appellant.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
November 24, 1905.)
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Second District. Action by the Haverhill Box Board Company against Coy, Hunt & Co. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
Affirmed.
Robinson & Robinson, for appellant.
James S. Lehmaier, for respondent.

Opinion:
MacLEAN, J.
Upon their admissions made at the trial, recovery for goods manufactured and delivered was properly awarded against the defendants, who, having the affirmative on their counterclaim for failure to fill certain other orders, by introducing depositions taken on plaintiff's behalf of witnesses whom they specifically adopted as their own, offered sufficient to sustain the finding by the learned trial justice that such unfilled orders were accepted only conditionally. Judgment affirmed, with costs.