Case Name: Dontez Lamont SIMUEL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-04-13
Citations: 92 F. App'x 971
Docket Number: No. 03-7763
Parties: Dontez Lamont SIMUEL, Petitioner—Appellant, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Respondent—Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 92
Pages: 971–971

Head Matter:
Dontez Lamont SIMUEL, Petitioner—Appellant, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Respondent—Appellee.
No. 03-7763.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 31, 2004.
Decided: April 13, 2004.
Dontez Lamont Simuel, Appellant pro se.
Clarence Joe DelForge, III, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Dontez Lamont Simuel seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Simuel has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We deny Simuel's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED