Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HSIN-YU CHEN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-11-14
Citations: 206 F. App'x 719
Docket Number: No. 05-10687
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HSIN-YU CHEN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: LEAVY, GOULD, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 206
Pages: 719–719

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HSIN-YU CHEN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-10687.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 6, 2006.
Filed Nov. 14, 2006.
Karon V. Johnson, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Hagatna, GU, for PlaintiffAppellee.
Howard Trapp, Esq., Hagatna, GU, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: LEAVY, GOULD, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Hsin-Yu Chen appeals the three-year sentence imposed following her conviction for alien smuggling. She contends that the district court erred in ruling that it lacked authority under 18 U.S.C. § 3561(a) to impose a sentence of probation because the three-year mandatory minimum sentencing provision of 18 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(ii) does not expressly preclude a sentence of probation within the meaning of § 3561(a)(2). This contention is foreclosed by United States v. Mueller, 463 F.3d 887 (9th Cir.2006).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.