Case Name: The State ex rel. Gibson, Appellant, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellees
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1998-07-01
Citations: 82 Ohio St. 3d 293
Docket Number: No. 95-2084
Parties: The State ex rel. Gibson, Appellant, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellees.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 82
Pages: 293–296

Head Matter:
The State ex rel. Gibson, Appellant, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellees.
[Cite as State ex rel. Gibson v. Indus. Comm. (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 293.]
(No. 95-2084
Submitted May 27, 1998
Decided July 1, 1998.)
William P. Bringman Co., L.P.A., and William P. Bringman, for appellant.
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and William A. Thorman III, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission.
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur and Brian D. Hall, Special Counsel, and John J. Biancamano, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Ohio State University.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
State ex rel. Draganic v. Indus. Comm. (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 461, 663 N.E.2d 929, held that the commission was not bound by a prior interlocutory order of PTD compensation. The commission did not, therefore, abuse its discretion in denying further PTD compensation on this basis.
We also find that the commission's order adequately explains the reasoning, thereby complying with State ex rel. Noll v. Indus. Comm. (1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 203, 567 N.E.2d 245. Because Noll compliance negates any right to relief under State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666, claimant's request for relief consistent with Gay is not well taken.
Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Douglas, J., dissents.