Case Name: Victor Rivera, Respondent, v. Rumax Reality Corporation, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1939-02-17
Citations: 256 A.D. 277
Docket Number: 
Parties: Victor Rivera, Respondent, v. Rumax Reality Corporation, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 256
Pages: 277–278

Head Matter:
Victor Rivera, Respondent, v. Rumax Reality Corporation, Appellant.
First Department,
February 17, 1939.
Robert E. Perm of counsel [Joseph E. Greenberg, attorney], for the appellant.
Mark L. Giller, for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Upon the newly-discovered evidence of the president and bookkeeper of the plaintiff's employer that the plaintiff was at work at the time of the alleged accident and for a considerable time thereafter, the motion for a new trial should have been granted.
The determination of the Appellate Term and the judgment and order of the Municipal Court should be reversed and the motion for a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant in all courts to abide the event.
Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, TJntermyer and Cohn, JJ.
Determination of the Appellate Term and judgment and order of the Municipal Court unanimously reversed, and the motion for a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant in all courts to abide the event.