Case Name: State of Ohio v. Hearne
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1926
Citations: 4 Ohio Law Abs. 774
Docket Number: No. 19667
Parties: State of Ohio v. Hearne.
Judges: Marshall, CJ., Jones and Allen, JJ., concur.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 4
Pages: 774–774

Head Matter:
No. 19667
State of Ohio v. Hearne.

Opinion:
DAY, J.
Upon trial under an indictment charging "unlawfully, falsely making, forging and counterfeiting a certain check" with intent to defraud, and the uttering and publishing thereof, proof that the offense consisted in the defendant forging the name of the payee on the back of such check, with intent to defraud and uttering and publishing the same with like intent, does not constitute such a variance as to justify a directed verdict of not guilty.
Exceptions sustained.
Marshall, CJ., Jones and Allen, JJ., concur.