Case Name: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. FRANK GYORI, JR., DEFENDANT-PETITIONER
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 2005-12-29
Citations: 185 N.J. 422
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. FRANK GYORI, JR., DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 185
Pages: 422–422

Head Matter:
887 A.2d 156
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. FRANK GYORI, JR., DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.
Argued November 7, 2005
Decided December 29, 2005.
James H. Maynard argued the cause for appellant (Maynard & Truland, attorneys; Joe B. Truland, Jr., on the brief).
Catherine M. Broderick, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Michael M. Rubbinaccio, Morris County Prosecutor, attorney).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed and the cause remanded to the Superior Court for entry of an order dismissing the indictment substantially for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Wecker reported at 373 N.J.Super. 559, 567-73, 862 A.2d 1178 (App.Div.2004).
For reversal—Justices LONG, LaVECCHIA, ZAZZALI, ALBIN, WALLACE AND RIVERA-SOTO—6.
Opposed—None.
This appeal arises from the denial of defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment, not from a criminal conviction. Judge Wecker concluded that she would "reverse defendant's conviction," State v. Gyori, 373 N.J.Super. at 567, 862 A.2d 1178. Given the procedural posture of this case, however, the proper relief is as ordered here: dismissal of the indictment.