Case Name: Peter CAPAZZI, Appellant, v. Sadith Mendoza GOLDBERG, f/k/a/ Sadith Mendoza, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2004-11-10
Citations: 885 So. 2d 1039
Docket Number: No. 3D04-573
Parties: Peter CAPAZZI, Appellant, v. Sadith Mendoza GOLDBERG, f/k/a/ Sadith Mendoza, Appellee.
Judges: Before LEVY, GERSTEN, and FLETCHER, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 885
Pages: 1039–1040

Head Matter:
Peter CAPAZZI, Appellant, v. Sadith Mendoza GOLDBERG, f/k/a/ Sadith Mendoza, Appellee.
No. 3D04-573.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 10, 2004.
Sheldon Zipkin, North Miami Beach, for appellant.
Robert D. Slewett, North Miami Beach, and Steven K. Schwartz, Boca Raton, for appellee.
Before LEVY, GERSTEN, and FLETCHER, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Because one or more issues of material fact exist, summary judgment was improper. See Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966). In particular, paragraph 7 of the trial court's order and its use of equivocal language indicates issues of fact to be determined. Accordingly, we reverse the order granting summary judgment and remand for further proceedings. See Moore v. Morris, 475 So.2d 666 (Fla.1985).
Reversed and remanded.