Case Name: Rafael YEE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2017-03-30
Citations: 214 So. 3d 540
Docket Number: No. SC15-1925
Parties: Rafael YEE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: LABARGA, C.J., and CANADY, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur. QUINCE, J., dissents with an opinion, in which PARIENTE and LEWIS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 214
Pages: 540–541

Head Matter:
Rafael YEE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. SC15-1925
Supreme Court of Florida.
[March 30, 2017]
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Jonathan Greenberg, Assistant Public Defender, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami, Florida, for Petitioner
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida; and Richard L. Polin, Bureau Chief, and Keri T. Joseph, Assistant Attorney General, Miami, Florida, for Respondent ■ •

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted review of the decision in State v. Yee, 177 So.3d 72, 73-74 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015), based on conflict jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. After hearing oral argument, we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted and dismiss the petition.
It is so ordered.
LABARGA, C.J., and CANADY, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur. QUINCE, J., dissents with an opinion, in which PARIENTE and LEWIS, JJ., concur.
NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.