Case Name: Samuel SHAW, Petitioner, v. Elizabeth SHAW, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-04-18
Citations: 816 So. 2d 540
Docket Number: No. SC00-1577
Parties: Samuel SHAW, Petitioner, v. Elizabeth SHAW, Respondent.
Judges: WELLS, C.J., and HARDING, ANSTEAD, and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 816
Pages: 540–546

Head Matter:
Samuel SHAW, Petitioner, v. Elizabeth SHAW, Respondent.
No. SC00-1577.
Supreme Court of Florida.
April 18, 2002.
Diane H. Tutt and Sharon C. Degnan of Diane H. Tutt, P.A., Plantation, FL, for Petitioner.
Abbe Cohn of Abbe Cohn, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, FL; and Nancy W. Gregoire of Bunnell, Woulfe, Kirschbaum, Keller & McIntyre, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We granted review of Shaw v. Shaw, 760 So.2d 981 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), based on apparent conflict with Williams v. Williams, 690 So.2d 601 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). Upon examination of the record, we have determined that jurisdiction was granted improvidently. Accordingly, because we find no alternative basis for jurisdiction, this cause is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
WELLS, C.J., and HARDING, ANSTEAD, and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
LEWIS, J., dissents with an opinion, in which SHAW, J., concurs.
PARIENTE, J., recused.