Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Curtis JOHNSON, a/k/a Curt, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-04-28
Citations: 568 F. App'x 263
Docket Number: No. 13-7884
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Curtis JOHNSON, a/k/a Curt, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 568
Pages: 263–264

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Curtis JOHNSON, a/k/a Curt, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-7884.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 24, 2014.
Decided: April 28, 2014.
James Curtis Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. J. Frank Bradsher, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
James Curtis Johnson appeals the district court's order denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 8582 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Johnson, No. 5:01-cr-00090-H-l (E.D.N.C. Nov. 7, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.