Case Name: Harley David CROSBY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY; South Carolina Highway Patrol; James C. Filyaw, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-06-22
Citations: 691 F. App'x 783
Docket Number: No. 17-1236
Parties: Harley David CROSBY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY; South Carolina Highway Patrol; James C. Filyaw, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 691
Pages: 783–784

Head Matter:
Harley David CROSBY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY; South Carolina Highway Patrol; James C. Filyaw, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 17-1236
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 20, 2017
Decided: June 22, 2017
Harley David Crosby, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Thomas Dorsel, Sandra J. Senn, SENN LEGAL, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Harley David Crosby appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) claim and remanding the remaining claims to the state court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Crosby v. South Carolina Dep't of Pub. Safety, 2:15-cv-01455-RMG, 2017 WL 398352 (D.S.C. Jan. 30, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED