Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Charles TINER, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-09-04
Citations: 61 S.W.3d 274
Docket Number: No. ED 78383
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Charles TINER, Appellant.
Judges: Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 61
Pages: 274–274

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Charles TINER, Appellant.
No. ED 78383.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Sept. 4, 2001.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 31, 2001.
Application for Transfer Denied Dec. 18, 2001.
Henry B. Robertson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Robert P. McCulloch, Pros. Atty., Carolyn C. Woods, Asst. Pros. Atty., Clayton, MO, for respondent.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Charles W. Tiner ("Defendant") appeals his conviction of assault in the third degree. Defendant argues that the trial court erred by proceeding to a bench trial of this misdemeanor case because Defendant did not knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waive his constitutional and statutory right to jury trial. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a brief memorandum, for their use only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).