Case Name: B. W. Acuff v. The State
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1922-11-08
Citations: 92 Tex. Crim. 548
Docket Number: No. 7175
Parties: B. W. Acuff v. The State.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Criminal Reports
Volume: 92
Pages: 548–548

Head Matter:
B. W. Acuff v. The State.
No. 7175.
Decided November 8, 1922.
Theft — Felony—Indictment—Grand Jury.
Where the grand jury which found and returned the indictment in the instant case had been illegally selected, the said indictment is invalid, and the prosecution must be dismissed. Following Russell v. State, 92 Texas Crim. Rep., 93, 242 S. W. Rep., 240, and other cases.
Appeal from the District Court of Wichita. Tried below before the Honorable P. A. Martin.
Appeal from a conviction of felony theft; penalty, five years imprisonment in the penitentiary.
The opinion states the case.
No brief on file for appellant.
R. G. Storey, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Opinion:
HAWKINS, Judge.
— Appellant was indicted for felony theft. Upon trial he was convicted, and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the penitentiary for five years.
Attack was made upon the indictment because returned by an illegal grand jury. The indictment was returned by the same grand jury, the selection and organization of which we had occasion to consider in Russell v. State, 92 Texas Crim. Rep., 93, 242 S. W. Rep., 240, Saulter v. State, 92 Texas Crim. Rep., 96, 242 S. W. Rep., 242. We refer to those cases for our reason for holding the said grand jury to have been illegally selected, and the indictments returned thereby invalid. For the same reasons the judgment in this case must be reversed and the prosecution dismissed, and it is so ordered.
Dismissed.