Case Name: EAST COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, Appellant, v. FRUITLAND FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-07-16
Citations: 138 S.W.3d 728
Docket Number: No. ED 80495
Parties: EAST COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, Appellant, v. FRUITLAND FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, Respondent.
Judges: Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 138
Pages: 728–728

Head Matter:
EAST COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, Appellant, v. FRUITLAND FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, Respondent.
No. ED 80495.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
July 16, 2002.
William Patrick Cronan, Rocheport, MO, for appellant.
James E. Mello, Jeffery T. McPherson, Armstrong Teasdale LLP, St. Louis, MO, for Nordenia USA, Inc.
Albert C. Lowes, Cape Girardeau, MO, for Fruitland Fire Protection District.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
East County Fire Protection District ("Plaintiff') appeals the judgment dismissing its claim against Fruitland Fire Protection District ("Defendant") for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief, and the judgment granting Nordenia Industries ("Intervenor") its motion to intervene. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. A detailed opinion would be of no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a brief memorandum opinion, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).