Case Name: Pedro PEREIRO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-06-21
Citations: 656 So. 2d 278
Docket Number: No. 94-847
Parties: Pedro PEREIRO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and LEVY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 656
Pages: 278–278

Head Matter:
Pedro PEREIRO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 94-847.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
June 21, 1995.
Pedro Pereiro, in pro. per.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Mark C. Katzef, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.
Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and LEVY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
As appellant correctly concedes, the trial court's denial of his motion, filed pursuant to Rule 3.850 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, must be affirmed due to the fact that it failed to contain the oath required by law.
This affirmance, however, is without prejudice to the refiling of a properly sworn motion in the trial court. See Love v. State, 623 So.2d 1221 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).
Affirmed.