Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Richard Daniel GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-08-14
Citations: 695 F. App'x 79
Docket Number: No. 15-40817
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Richard Daniel GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before STEWART, Chief Judge, and JONES and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 695
Pages: 79–79

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Richard Daniel GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant
No. 15-40817
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed August 14, 2017
Paula Camille Offenhauser, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Richard Daniel Garcia, Pro Se
Before STEWART, Chief Judge, and JONES and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The panel entered a limited remand in this case in an opinion dated August 1, 2017. Upon receipt of the district court's order dated August 7, 2017, the panel now files this supplement to our prior opinion. The' district court order states that the district court "did not consider new information in the Addendum to deny Garcia's motion" for a 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) sentence reduction. The denial of the sentence reduction was based on Garcia's past criminal history and his continued threat to public safety. Therefore, as the court did not consider the new evidence in the Addendum, there was no error. Therefore we AFFIRM the district court.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.