Case Name: NEW BRUNSWICK MOTOR TRUST SALES, INCORPORATED, APPELLANT, v. HARRY W. SCOTT, RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1935-10-09
Citations: 115 N.J.L. 520
Docket Number: 
Parties: NEW BRUNSWICK MOTOR TRUST SALES, INCORPORATED, APPELLANT, v. HARRY W. SCOTT, RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 115
Pages: 520–520

Head Matter:
NEW BRUNSWICK MOTOR TRUST SALES, INCORPORATED, APPELLANT, v. HARRY W. SCOTT, RESPONDENT.
Submitted May 31, 1935
Decided October 9, 1935.
For the appellant, Richard M. Glassner.
For the respondent, Harry Levin.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.