Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Sarnie Jay LOUIS, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2014-03-11
Citations: 429 S.W.3d 479
Docket Number: No. ED 99838
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Sarnie Jay LOUIS, Appellant.
Judges: Before LISA S. VAN AMBURG, P.J., PATRICIA L. COHEN, J., and PHILIP M. HESS, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 429
Pages: 479–480

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Sarnie Jay LOUIS, Appellant.
No. ED 99838.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
March 11, 2014.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 14, 2014.
Application for Transfer Denied May 27, 2014.
Samuel E. Buffaloe, Assistant Public Defender, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before LISA S. VAN AMBURG, P.J., PATRICIA L. COHEN, J., and PHILIP M. HESS, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Sarnie Louis (Defendant) appeals the judgment of conviction entered after a jury found him guilty of driving while his license was revoked. Defendant contends the trial court abused its discretion in admitting an exhibit containing his entire driving record and permitting the jury to review the exhibit during deliberations. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the judgment in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).