Case Name: Shirley Venoya REMMERT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-11-07
Citations: 670 F. App'x 584
Docket Number: No. 15-16471
Parties: Shirley Venoya REMMERT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: LEAVY, GRABER, and • CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 670
Pages: 584–584

Head Matter:
Shirley Venoya REMMERT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15-16471
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted October 25, 2016
Filed November 7, 2016
Shirley Venoya Remmert, Pro Se
Before: LEAVY, GRABER, and • CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. ' See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Shirley Venoya Remmert appeals pro se from the district court's order denying her leave to file a complaint under a vexatious litigant order. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion the application of a vexatious litigant order. Moy v. United States, 906 F.2d 467, 469 (9th Cir. 1990). We affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Remmert leave to file a complaint against defendants because Remmert attempted to file the complaint in violation of a vexatious litigant ordered entered against her. See id.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.