Case Name: Anna C. Polatschek, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Bernard Polatschek, Deceased, Respondent, v. City of New York, Appellant, Caristo Construction Corp., Respondent-Appellant, and Trio Industries, Inc., Respondent; City of New York, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Schumacher & Farley Plumbing and Heating, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1973-11-21
Citations: 33 N.Y.2d 795
Docket Number: 
Parties: Anna C. Polatschek, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Bernard Polatschek, Deceased, Respondent, v. City of New York, Appellant, Caristo Construction Corp., Respondent-Appellant, and Trio Industries, Inc., Respondent. City of New York, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Schumacher & Farley Plumbing and Heating, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 33
Pages: 795–798

Head Matter:
Anna C. Polatschek, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Bernard Polatschek, Deceased, Respondent, v. City of New York, Appellant, Caristo Construction Corp., Respondent-Appellant, and Trio Industries, Inc., Respondent. City of New York, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Schumacher & Farley Plumbing and Heating, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
Argued October 12, 1973;
decided November 21, 1973.
Normcm Redlich, Corporation Counsel (Irving Germ and ■Stanley Buchsbaum of counsel), for City of New York, appellant.
Asher Marcus and Peter James Johnson for Caristo Construction Corp., respondent-appellant.
William F. McNulty, Albert P. Thill and Anthony J. McNulty for Trio Industries, Inc., respondent.
Normán Goldsmith and Donald Miller for plaintiff-respondent.
Arnold Davis, Herbert Lasky and Philip Waters for third-party defendant-respondent.

Opinion:
On the appeal by the City of New York: Order affirmed, with costs to the prevailing parties; no opinión.
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Breitel, Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones and Wachtler.
On the appeal by Caristo Construction Corp.: Appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that appellant is not aggrieved by the 'modification at the Appellate Division (CPLR 5601, subd. [a], par. [iii]).