Case Name: Michelle MAUPIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HOWARD COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM; Howard County Board of Education; Restia Whitaker, individually and in his official capacity; Christian J. Callender, individually and in his official capacity; John L. Seibel, individually and in his official capacity; Robyn McDonald, individually and in her official capacity, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-04-01
Citations: 420 F. App'x 227
Docket Number: No. 10-1895
Parties: Michelle MAUPIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HOWARD COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM; Howard County Board of Education; Restia Whitaker, individually and in his official capacity; Christian J. Callender, individually and in his official capacity; John L. Seibel, individually and in his official capacity; Robyn McDonald, individually and in her official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 420
Pages: 227–227

Head Matter:
Michelle MAUPIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HOWARD COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM; Howard County Board of Education; Restia Whitaker, individually and in his official capacity; Christian J. Callender, individually and in his official capacity; John L. Seibel, individually and in his official capacity; Robyn McDonald, individually and in her official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 10-1895.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 24, 2011.
Decided: April 1, 2011.
As Amended on Denial of Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc May 18, 2011.
Michelle Maupin, Appellant Pro Se. Edmund J. O’Meally, Lisa Y. Settles, Hodes, Pessin & Katz, PA, Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michelle Maupin appeals the magistrate judge's order granting summary judgment for the defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Maupin v. Howard Cnty. Bd. of Edue., No. 1:08-cv02203-BPG (D.Md. July 15, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
This case was decided by a magistrate judge with the parties' consent pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2006).