Case Name: Carmen SUAREZ-SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BAC HOME LOAN SERVICING, LP; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-03-21
Citations: 512 F. App'x 722
Docket Number: No. 11-17509
Parties: Carmen SUAREZ-SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BAC HOME LOAN SERVICING, LP; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 512
Pages: 722–723

Head Matter:
Carmen SUAREZ-SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BAC HOME LOAN SERVICING, LP; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 11-17509.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 12, 2013.
Filed March 21, 2013.
Carmen Suarez-Smith, Las Vegas, NV, pro se.
Steven Shervorski, Ariel Edward Stern, Esquire, Akerman Senterfitt LLP, Heidi Parry Stern, Reisman Sorokac, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Carmen Suarez-Smith appeals pro se from the district court's order dismissing her complaint with leave to amend in her action arising out of foreclosure proceedings. We must raise the question of our jurisdiction sua sponte. WMX Tech., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1183, 1135 (9th Cir.1997) (en banc). We dismiss for lack of appellate jurisdiction.
The district court dismissed Suarez-Smith's complaint with leave to amend by November 14, 2011. Rather than filing an amended complaint or obtaining a final order of dismissal from the district court, Suarez-Smith filed a notice of appeal. We therefore lack jurisdiction. See id. at 1135-37 (a district court's dismissal that expressly grants leave to amend is not final, and a further district court determination must be obtained before such a case becomes appealable).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.