Case Name: Susan DIAL, et al., Petitioners, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1999-12-16
Citations: 752 So. 2d 555
Docket Number: No. 95,507
Parties: Susan DIAL, et al., Petitioners, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 752
Pages: 555–555

Head Matter:
Susan DIAL, et al., Petitioners, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 95,507.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Dec. 16, 1999.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Cherry Grant, Assistant Public Defender, Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, West Palm Beach, Florida, for Petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Celia Terenzio, Bureau Chief, West Palm Beach, and' Leslie T. Campbell, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, Florida, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PARIENTE, J.
We have for review State v. Dial 730 So.2d 813 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), which expressly and directly conflicts with the opinions in State v. Holland, 689 So.2d 1268 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), and State v. Perry, 716 So.2d 327 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. For reasons expressed in our opinion in Hayes v. State, 750 So.2d 1 (Fla.1999), the decision of the Fourth District is hereby quashed. We remand to the district court for proceedings consistent with this opinion. It is so ordered.
HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.