Case Name: COUNTY OF CLARK, a Political Subdivision of the State of Nevada; JAMES G. RYAN, JAMES A. BRENNAN, MYRON LEAVITT, ROBERT N. BROADBENT and TOM WIESNER, County Commissioners of Clark County, Appellants, v. IRENE LUCAS, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada
Jurisdiction: Nevada
Decision Date: 1975-04-28
Citations: 91 Nev. 263
Docket Number: No. 7651
Parties: COUNTY OF CLARK, a Political Subdivision of the State of Nevada; JAMES G. RYAN, JAMES A. BRENNAN, MYRON LEAVITT, ROBERT N. BROADBENT and TOM WIESNER, County Commissioners of Clark County, Appellants, v. IRENE LUCAS, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Nevada Reports
Volume: 91
Pages: 263–264

Head Matter:
COUNTY OF CLARK, a Political Subdivision of the State of Nevada; JAMES G. RYAN, JAMES A. BRENNAN, MYRON LEAVITT, ROBERT N. BROADBENT and TOM WIESNER, County Commissioners of Clark County, Appellants, v. IRENE LUCAS, Respondent.
No. 7651
April 28, 1975
534 P.2d 499
George Holt, District Attorney, Peter N. Reynolds, Deputy District Attorney, and Victor W. Priebe, Deputy District Attorney, Clark County, for Appellants.
Lee and Beasey, of Las Vegas, for Respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION
Per Curiam:
Irene Lucas was first employed by the Clark County Clerk in June 1965. Her services at all times were apparently satisfactory. For a period of three years prior to this lawsuit she was assigned as the court clerk of one of the judicial departments in the Eighth Judicial District.
On January 20, 1970, while emotionally upset over a lost document involved in a difficult trial in her department, later to be completely absolved of blame, she wrote a letter of resignation which was delivered to the County Clerk, her superior. Although the County Clerk at some later date wrote her acceptance of the purported resignation, intervening events and conversations cast doubt upon the resignation or at least indicated withdrawal of it before it was accepted. She was not, however, permitted to return to work.
Mrs. Lucas sued the county for lost pay and other damages and was awarded judgment for $11,371.50. The trial court determined on the facts presented that she had not been properly notified of the acceptance of the resignation as required and thus the court found she was wrongfully discharged.
Where a trial court sitting without a jury makes a determination upon conflicting evidence that determination will not be disturbed on appeal if it is suported by substantial evidence. Fletcher v. Fletcher, 89 Nev. 540, 516 P.2d 103 (1973).
The findings of the trial court in this case are supported by substantial evidence.
Affirmed.
See County of Clark Personnel Manual, July 21, 1969.