Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. GERALD LAUREN FRIES, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2003-02-19
Citations: 186 Or. App. 564
Docket Number: 01-01-30663; A114950
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. GERALD LAUREN FRIES, Appellant.
Judges: Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Kistler and Schuirtan, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 186
Pages: 564–565

Head Matter:
Submitted on record and briefs January 14,
vacated in part; remanded in part; otherwise affirmed February 19, 2003
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. GERALD LAUREN FRIES, Appellant.
01-01-30663; A114950
63 P3d 1269
Steve Lindsey filed the brief for appellant. With him on the brief was Des & Shannon Connall, LLP.
David J. Amesbury, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.
Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Kistler and Schuirtan, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
In accordance with a plea agreement, defendant pleaded guilty to one count of manufacturing a controlled substance within 1,000 feet of a school, ORS 475.999(1), and one count of possession of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992(5). He appeals the portion of the sentence that ordered the forfeiture of 16 firearms that the police found during a search of his residence. The state concedes that the record is insufficient to support the forfeiture, and we agree. Former ORS 166.280(1) (1999), repealed by Or Laws 2001, ch 666, § 56; State v. Berg, 122 Or App 573, 857 P2d 909 (1993).
As part of the plea agreement defendant agreed that, if the trial court did not order forfeiture of the firearms, he would pay a $2,500 fine. The state suggests that we should remand the case so that the court may consider whether to modify the sentence in accordance with that agreement. Again, we agree.
Order forfeiting firearms vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.