Case Name: PALMA PLAZA OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant, v. CUMMINGS & LOCKWOOD, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1998-02-25
Citations: 706 So. 2d 1376
Docket Number: No. 97-2185
Parties: PALMA PLAZA OWNERS’ ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant, v. CUMMINGS & LOCKWOOD, Appellee.
Judges: WARNER, POLEN and FARMER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 706
Pages: 1376–1377

Head Matter:
PALMA PLAZA OWNERS’ ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant, v. CUMMINGS & LOCKWOOD, Appellee.
No. 97-2185.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb. 25, 1998.
Rehearing and Reconsideration Denied April 1, 1998.
Geoffrey B. Marks of Cole White & Billb-rough, Miami, for appellant.
No brief filed for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the order denying the motion to dissolve the temporary injunction. The appellee failed to show irreparable harm. See Dep't of Transp. v. Kountry Kitchen of Key Largo, Inc., 645 So.2d 1086 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). Moreover, there does not appear to be such a likelihood of success based upon the condominium documents involved in this case to justify a temporary injunction.
Although challenges to the sufficiency of an injunction are generally not allowed on a motion to dissolve, where the injunction was issued ex parte, this rule would not apply. Cf. Hunter v. Dennies Contracting Co., 693 So.2d 615 (Fla. 2d DCA1997). In the instant case, notice was given to an officer of the appellant who admitted that he was aligned with the interests of the appellee in this action. Moreover, no evidence was taken at the hearing on the temporary injunction. Instead, affidavits were relied on. Thus, we consider that the hearing on the original injunction was held with improper notice.
WARNER, POLEN and FARMER, JJ., concur.