Case Name: Sigifredo Molina et al., Respondents, v. Mendon Leasing Corp. et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2000-04-27
Citations: 271 A.D.2d 385
Docket Number: 
Parties: Sigifredo Molina et al., Respondents, v Mendon Leasing Corp. et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 271
Pages: 385–386

Head Matter:
Sigifredo Molina et al., Respondents, v Mendon Leasing Corp. et al., Appellants.
[708 NYS2d 283]

Opinion:
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lowe, III, J.), entered August 23, 1999, which, in this personal injury action, granted plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend the complaint to increase the ad damnum and for an order transferring this action from Civil Court to Supreme Court, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
In the absence of prejudice to the defendant, a motion to amend the ad damnum clause should generally be granted (Loomis v Civetta Corinno Constr. Corp., 54 NY2d 18, 21-22; Sahdala v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 251 AD2d 70). Accordingly, as no prejudice attributable to the amendment proposed by plaintiffs was shown by defendants, the motion court's grant of the requested relief should be affirmed. We have reviewed defendants' remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Mazzarelli, J. P., Ellerin, Lerner, Rubin and Andrias, JJ.