Case Name: Elizabeth Birch and Others, Appellants, v. Rosalie M. Loyd, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1895-02
Citations: 91 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 609
Docket Number: 
Parties: Elizabeth Birch and Others, Appellants, v. Rosalie M. Loyd, Respondent.
Judges: Brown, P. J., and Pratt, J., concurred.
Reporter: Supreme Court Reports (Hun)
Volume: 91
Pages: 609–609

Head Matter:
Elizabeth Birch and Others, Appellants, v. Rosalie M. Loyd, Respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment and order denying motion for a new trial on the minutes affirmed, with costs, and order denying motion for a new trial on newly-discovered evidence affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.—
Dykman, J.:
There are three appeals in this case, one from the judgment entered upon the verdict in favor of the defendant after a trial at the Circuit, one from the order denying a motion for a new trial upon- the minutes of the court, and one from an order denying a motion for a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence, and the appeals are all entirely destitute of merit. Justice has been done, and the judgment and order denying the motion for a new trial on the minutes should be affirmed, with costs, and the order denying the motion for a new trial upon newly-discovered evidence should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, without an opinion.
Brown, P. J., and Pratt, J., concurred.