Case Name: William G. KING, Sr., Appellant, v. Adelia T. KING, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-12-20
Citations: 553 So. 2d 396
Docket Number: No. 88-2967
Parties: William G. KING, Sr., Appellant, v. Adelia T. KING, Appellee.
Judges: GLICKSTEIN, WALDEN and WARNER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 553
Pages: 396–397

Head Matter:
William G. KING, Sr., Appellant, v. Adelia T. KING, Appellee.
No. 88-2967.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Dec. 20, 1989.
William G. King, Sr., Riviera Beach, pro se.
Susan M. Seigle of Gay, Ramsey & Lewis, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The pro se appellant asserts as error the trial court's failure to grant his motion to dismiss this dissolution action. The appel-lee takes the position that the motion was evidentiary and directed to the merits of the ease. However, it was not set for hearing before the trial court, nor did appellant appear at the final judgment hearing to assert his position. Since the error, if any, was not preserved in the trial court, we must affirm. Palmer v. Thomas, 284 So.2d 709 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973).
GLICKSTEIN, WALDEN and WARNER, JJ., concur.