Case Name: In the Interest of A.D.J. and D.L.J., each a child, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-09-18
Citations: 586 So. 2d 451
Docket Number: Nos. 90-2797, 90-2798
Parties: In the Interest of A.D.J. and D.L.J., each a child, Appellee.
Judges: BOOTH, WOLF and KAHN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 586
Pages: 451–452

Head Matter:
In the Interest of A.D.J. and D.L.J., each a child, Appellee.
Nos. 90-2797, 90-2798.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Sept. 18, 1991.
Rehearing Denied Oct. 24, 1991.
Daniel A. Smith, Jacksonville, for appellant.
John L. Sullivan, HRS, Jacksonville, for appellee.
Melissa P. Webb, Smith & Hulsey, Jacksonville, for guardian ad litem.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The trial court did not err in denying the motion for recusal, Moser v. Coleman, 460 So.2d 385 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), or in finding clear and convincing evidence to support the termination of appellant's parental rights. In the Interest of D.J.S. and J.S.G., 563 So.2d 655, 662 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990) (en banc). Accordingly, the order under review is affirmed.
BOOTH, WOLF and KAHN, JJ., concur.