Case Name: Raymond Rodriquez ESPINOZA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee; Henry ESPINOZA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1987-10-21
Citations: 738 S.W.2d 669
Docket Number: Nos. 002-84, 003-84
Parties: Raymond Rodriquez ESPINOZA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. Henry ESPINOZA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
Judges: DUNCAN, J., joins.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 738
Pages: 669–673

Head Matter:
Raymond Rodriquez ESPINOZA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. Henry ESPINOZA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
Nos. 002-84, 003-84.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.
Oct. 21, 1987.
Ward Casey, Fort Worth, Joseph A. Connors, III, McAllen, for appellant.
John B. Holmes, Jr., Dist. Atty. and James C. Brough, Charley Davidson and Don Smyth, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, Robert Huttash, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
OPINION
MILLER, Judge.
Appellants were convicted by a jury of aggravated robbery. Punishment was assessed by the trial court at twenty years confinement and a fine of ten thousand dollars each. On appeal the Fourteenth Court of Appeals reversed the convictions. Espinoza v. State, 662 S.W.2d 745 (Tx.App.—Houston (14th), 1983).
We have reviewed the issues and find upon reconsideration that this petition was improvidently granted. It is therefore ordered dismissed. See Grigsby v. State, 653 S.W.2d 43 (Tex.Cr.App.1983).