Case Name: Mark E. ANDREWS, On Behalf of Himself and others Similarly Situated v. TRANS UNION CORPORATION
Court: Louisiana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 2006-04-17
Citations: 926 So. 2d 495
Docket Number: No. 2005-C-2562
Parties: Mark E. ANDREWS, On Behalf of Himself and others Similarly Situated v. TRANS UNION CORPORATION.
Judges: VICTORY, J. Concurs in the Denial of the Writ and Assigns Reasons.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 926
Pages: 495–496

Head Matter:
Mark E. ANDREWS, On Behalf of Himself and others Similarly Situated v. TRANS UNION CORPORATION.
No. 2005-C-2562.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
April 17, 2006.
VICTORY, J. Concurs in the Denial of the Writ and Assigns Reasons.

Opinion:
VICTORY, J.,
concurring.
While I believe there may be some problems with the class definition adopted by the district court, my decision to concur in the denial of this writ is affected by the statement made by class counsel in its opposition to defendant's writ to this court that it intends "upon remand, to request the trial court judge to modify the class definition, out of an abundance of caution, to ameliorate Judge Murray's concerns."