Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesse A. Leon GUERRERO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-09-22
Citations: 143 F. App'x 900
Docket Number: No. 04-10558
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jesse A. Leon GUERRERO, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: REINHARDT, RYMER, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 143
Pages: 900–901

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jesse A. Leon GUERRERO, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 04-10558.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 12, 2005.
Decided Sept. 22, 2005.
Marivic P. David, Hagatna, GU, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Louie J. Yanza, Esq., Vernier & Maher, LLP, Hagatna, GU, for Defendanb-Appellant.
Before: REINHARDT, RYMER, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Jesse A. Leon Guerrero appeals the district court's judgment imposing an 18-months sentence following the revocation of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Appellant contends that the district court failed to adequately set forth its reasons for departing from the recommended guideline range upon the revocation of his supervised release. However, upon review, we conclude that the district court's reasons are sufficiently specific for this Court to conduct a meaningful review, and the district court did not err. See United States v. Montenegro-Rojo, 908 F.2d 425, 427-28 (9th Cir.1990). To the extent appellant is challenging the district court's reasoning for the departure, we conclude that there was a basis for district court's decision, and the district court did not abuse its discretion. See United States v. Musa, 220 F.3d 1096, 1101 (9th Cir.2000).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.