Case Name: O'REILLY, Respondent, v. STEPHENS, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1900-11-27
Citations: 67 N.Y.S. 1141
Docket Number: 
Parties: O’REILLY, Respondent, v. STEPHENS, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 67
Pages: 1141–1141

Head Matter:
O’REILLY, Respondent, v. STEPHENS, Appellant.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
November 27, 1900.)
Action by Marie F. O’Reilly against Olin, J. Stephens. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
Affirmed.
Arthur Knox, for appellant.
Maurice Mayer, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We do not think that the circumstances adverted to by the defendant's counsel respecting the conduct of the trial justify the criticism made by him. They certainly cannot be said to have operated to the prejudice of his client, in view of the fact that the plaintiff's evidence respecting the defendant's liability is absolutely without contradiction. Judgment affirmed, with costs.