Case Name: Theodore A. AVELLONE, Appellant, v. Susan E. AVELLONE n/k/a Susan E. Rice, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2007-07-24
Citations: 960 So. 2d 910
Docket Number: No. 1D06-5219
Parties: Theodore A. AVELLONE, Appellant, v. Susan E. AVELLONE n/k/a Susan E. Rice, Appellee.
Judges: DAVIS, PADOVANO, and HAWKES, . JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 960
Pages: 910–911

Head Matter:
Theodore A. AVELLONE, Appellant, v. Susan E. AVELLONE n/k/a Susan E. Rice, Appellee.
No. 1D06-5219.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
July 24, 2007.
Theodore A. Avellone, pro se, Appellant.
Joshua D. Zelman and Patricia M. Durst of Durst, Harnden & Zelman, PL, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellee, the former wife, seeks review of the trial court's Order Awarding Attorney's Fees pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.400(c). In Avellone v. Avellone, 951 So.2d 80 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007), we affirmed the trial court's order denying the motion for contempt and to enforce the Marital Settlement Agreement filed by Appellant, the former husband. In accordance with our order granting Ap-pellee's motion for appellate attorney's fees, the trial court held a hearing to determine the amount. In its order, the trial court found that fifty hours was a reasonable amount of time to spend representing Appellee on appeal and that $200 per hour was a reasonable hourly fee, for a total reasonable fee of $10,000. The trial court then subtracted the $4,000 retainer paid by Appellee from the $10,000 and ordered that Appellant pay the sum of $6,000 to Appellee's attorney. Appellee moved for clarification and argued that the trial court's order penalized her for paying the retainer. The trial court denied the motion without explanation. This review followed.
Because we are unable to discern from the face of the trial court's order why it deducted the $4,000 retainer and ordered that Appellant only pay $6,000, we REVERSE the order and REMAND for further proceedings.
DAVIS, PADOVANO, and HAWKES, . JJ., concur.