Case Name: Austin SKINNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Naseer MOBASHAR, Physician; B.C. Elliott, Psychiatrist; M. Altizer, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-05-29
Citations: 63 F. App'x 769
Docket Number: No. 03-6181
Parties: Austin SKINNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Naseer MOBASHAR, Physician; B.C. Elliott, Psychiatrist; M. Altizer, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 63
Pages: 769–769

Head Matter:
Austin SKINNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Naseer MOBASHAR, Physician; B.C. Elliott, Psychiatrist; M. Altizer, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 03-6181.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 18, 2003.
Decided May 29, 2003.
Austin Skinner, Appellant Pro Se. Jim Harold Guynn, Jr., Guynn & Memmer, P.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
PER CURIAM:
Austin Skinner appeals the district court's order dismissing with prejudice his claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000), and dismissing without prejudice any and all state law claims implicated by the pleadings. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Skinner v. Mobashar, No. CA-01-915-7 (W.D.Va. Dec. 17, 2002). Skinner's motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.