Case Name: ELIZABETH VAN SICKELL, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. ABE MARGOLIS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1970-03-02
Citations: 55 N.J. 355
Docket Number: 
Parties: ELIZABETH VAN SICKELL, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. ABE MARGOLIS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 55
Pages: 355–355

Head Matter:
ELIZABETH VAN SICKELL, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. ABE MARGOLIS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Argued February 17, 1970
Decided March 2, 1970.
Mr. Raymond C. Oonnell argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Gonnell & Andre'Sahes, attorneys).
Mr. Adolph A. Romei argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Romei & Bernstein, attorneys).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion per curiam in the Appellate Division, 109 N. J. Super. 14.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Hane-man — 7.
For reversal — None.