Case Name: Carl Merton IRONS, II, Petitioner-Appellee, U.S. Attorney General, Intervenor, v. Tom L. CAREY, Warden, Respondent-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-11-06
Citations: 506 F.3d 951
Docket Number: No. 05-15275
Parties: Carl Merton IRONS, II, Petitioner-Appellee, U.S. Attorney General, Intervenor, v. Tom L. CAREY, Warden, Respondent-Appellant.
Judges: Before: STEPHEN REINHARDT, JOHN T. NOONAN, and FERDINAND F. FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 506
Pages: 951–956

Head Matter:
Carl Merton IRONS, II, Petitioner-Appellee, U.S. Attorney General, Intervenor, v. Tom L. CAREY, Warden, Respondent-Appellant.
No. 05-15275.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Nov. 6, 2007.
Ann C. McClintock, Esq., FPDCA— Federal Public Defender’s Office, Sacramento, CA, for Petitioner-Appellee.
Nina Swift Goodman, Attorney, Bob Erickson, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division/Appellate Section, Washington, DC, for Intervenor.
Ronald S. Matthias, AGCA — Office of the California Attorney General, Oakland, CA, Patrick J. Whalen, Esq., Pamela B. Hooley, Esq., AGCA — Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Respondent-Appellant.
Before: STEPHEN REINHARDT, JOHN T. NOONAN, and FERDINAND F. FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Order; Dissent by Judge KLEINFELD.
ORDER
The panel has voted to deny the petitions for rehearing and petitions for rehearing en banc.
The full court was advised of the petitions for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonre-cused active judges in favor of en banc reconsideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35.
The petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc are denied.