Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Franklin FIELDS, Defendant/Appellant; Franklin FIELDS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1993-08-24
Citations: 859 S.W.2d 274
Docket Number: Nos. 60955, 63078
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Franklin FIELDS, Defendant/Appellant. Franklin FIELDS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 859
Pages: 274–274

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Franklin FIELDS, Defendant/Appellant. Franklin FIELDS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Nos. 60955, 63078.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Aug. 24, 1993.
Susan K. Eckles, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Rudolph R. Rhodes, IV, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of second degree burglary, § 569.170, RSMo 1986, and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.-16(b).