Case Name: W. J. Brown and S. A. Brown, Appellants, v. Rebecca Tindel, Horace Tindel, Charlie Tindel and Claud Tindel, a Partnership Doing Business Under the Style and Firm Name of A. S. Tindel & Son, Appellees
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1922-11-18
Citations: 84 Fla. 582
Docket Number: 
Parties: W. J. Brown and S. A. Brown, Appellants, v. Rebecca Tindel, Horace Tindel, Charlie Tindel and Claud Tindel, a Partnership Doing Business Under the Style and Firm Name of A. S. Tindel & Son, Appellees.
Judges: Taylor, Whitfield, Ellis and West, J. J. concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 84
Pages: 582–582

Head Matter:
W. J. Brown and S. A. Brown, Appellants, v. Rebecca Tindel, Horace Tindel, Charlie Tindel and Claud Tindel, a Partnership Doing Business Under the Style and Firm Name of A. S. Tindel & Son, Appellees.
Decision Filed November 18, 1922.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Holmes County; D. J. Jones, Judge.
J. Henry Buttram, for Appellants;
Mathis & Weeks, for Appellees.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Taylor, Whitfield, Ellis and West, J. J. concur.
Browne, C. J.,.not participating.