Case Name: STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Rickey Lane POPE and Stanley Hurst, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-11-16
Citations: 569 So. 2d 1371
Docket Number: Nos. 89-3333, 89-3358
Parties: STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Rickey Lane POPE and Stanley Hurst, Appellees.
Judges: WENTWORTH, MINER and WOLF, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 569
Pages: 1371–1371

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Rickey Lane POPE and Stanley Hurst, Appellees.
Nos. 89-3333, 89-3358.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nov. 16, 1990.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Edward C. Hill, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellant.
Gary Baker, Callahan, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We decline to extend the defense of recantation to the charge of tampering with physical evidence. We therefore reverse that portion of the trial court's order dismissing the tampering charge based on suc^ defense and affirm the order of dismissal in all other respects,
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.
WENTWORTH, MINER and WOLF, JJ., concur.