Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Dominic HOLMES, Appellant; Dominic HOLMES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1994-06-14
Citations: 877 S.W.2d 687
Docket Number: Nos. 61448, 64805
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Dominic HOLMES, Appellant. Dominic HOLMES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 877
Pages: 687–687

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Dominic HOLMES, Appellant. Dominic HOLMES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 61448, 64805.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
June 14, 1994.
Robert E. Steele, Jr., St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
This is a consolidated appeal of Defendant's appeals from his conviction for first degree robbery and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. An opinion addressing Defendant's direct appeal would serve no jurisprudential purpose. Nor would an opinion addressing the appeal from the denial of his 29.15 motion serve a prece-dential purpose. We have provided the parties a memorandum for their use only detailing our reasons for affirmance.
Judgments affirmed pursuant to Rules 30.-25(b) and 84.16(b).