Case Name: CONNOR v. BAYNE, et al.
Court: Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jurisdiction: Maryland
Decision Date: 1959-04-15
Citations: 219 Md. 506
Docket Number: No. 181
Parties: CONNOR v. BAYNE, et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Maryland Reports
Volume: 219
Pages: 506–507

Head Matter:
CONNOR v. BAYNE, et al.
[No. 181,
September Term, 1958.]
Decided April 15, 1959.
Motion for rehearing filed May 13, 1959, denied May 14, 1959.
The cause was argued before Bruñe, C. J., and Henderson, Hammond and Prescott, JJ.
Johnson Bowie, with whom was Maurice W. Baldwin on the brief, for appellant.
Phillips L. Goldsborough, III, with whom were Clater W. Smith, Jr., and Clark, Smith & Prendergast on the brief, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER Curiam.
The point here raised on motion for summary judgment as to whether Code (1957), Art. 93, Sec. 112, is a remedial or substantive statute of limitations, is the same as that raised on demurrer and decided in Chandlee v. Shockley, 219 Md. 493. We regard that case as controlling.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.