Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DOE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-10-21
Citations: 662 F. App'x 515
Docket Number: No. 15-50344
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DOE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: TASHIMA, WARDLAW, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 662
Pages: 515–518

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DOE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-50344
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted September 1, 2016 Pasadena, California
Filed October 21, 2016
Helen H. Hong, Daniel Earl Zipp, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, Office of the US Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee.
Richard E. Lerner, Richard E. Lerner, New York, NY, for Intervenor-Pending RICHARD E. LERNER.
Frederick M, Oberlander, The Law Office of Frederick M Oberlander, Montauk,' NY, for Intervenor-Pending FREDERICK M. OBERLANDER.
Sarah E. Sloviter, Esquire, Attorney, Law Office of Sarah E. Sloviter, Jami Lynn Ferrara, Attorney, Law Office of Jami L. Ferrara, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: TASHIMA, WARDLAW, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Doe appeals the district court's denial of the parties' joint motion to seal an order denying a further reduction in sentence. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we reverse.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.