Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shawn James WOODALL, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-06-16
Citations: 184 F. App'x 670
Docket Number: No. 04-50468
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shawn James WOODALL, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: FERNANDEZ, KLEINFELD and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 184
Pages: 670–671

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shawn James WOODALL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 04-50468.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 12, 2006.
Filed June 16, 2006.
Anne K. Perry, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Shawn James Woodall, Fort Dix, NJ, pro se.
Before: FERNANDEZ, KLEINFELD and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Shawn James Woodall appeals pro se from the district court's order revoking his supervised release, sentencing him to 18 months imprisonment, and denying his motion to dismiss.
We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. See United States v. Palomba, 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir.1999) (stating that a defendant lacks standing to challenge a completed sentence); see also Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 14, 118 S.Ct. 978, 140 L.Ed.2d 43 (1998) (holding that revocation of parole does not create collateral consequences sufficient to extend standing beyond expiration of sentence and rejecting as moot a challenge to an allegedly erroneous parole revocation).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.