Case Name: Charles T. LEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-11-21
Citations: 670 F. App'x 777
Docket Number: No. 16-1675
Parties: Charles T. LEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 670
Pages: 777–777

Head Matter:
Charles T. LEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 16-1675
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: October 31, 2016
Decided: November 21, 2016
Charles T. Lee, Appellant Pro Se. Dustin Matthew Dow, John Bruce Lewis, Baker & Hostetler, LLP, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Charles T. Lee appeals the district court's order granting the Appellee's motion for summary judgment and dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lee v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co., No. 1:13-cv-00004-MR-DSC, 187 F.Supp.3d 623, 2016 WL 2746626 (W.D.N.C. May 11, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED