Case Name: ATLANTIC CITY v. RUDOLPH FANSLAR, PROSECUTOR
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1904-02-23
Citations: 70 N.J.L. 491
Docket Number: 
Parties: ATLANTIC CITY v. RUDOLPH FANSLAR, PROSECUTOR.
Judges: Before Justices Fort arid Pitney.
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 70
Pages: 491–492

Head Matter:
ATLANTIC CITY v. RUDOLPH FANSLAR, PROSECUTOR.
Argued November 5, 1903
Decided February 23, 1904.
On certiorari to the recorder of Atlantic City.
Before Justices Fort arid Pitney.
For the prosecutor, John O. Peed.
For the defendant, Harry Wootton.

Opinion:
The opinion oí the court was delivered by
Port, J.
The conviction in this case is affirmed for the reasons given in Atlantic City v. Feretti, decided at the present term.
The offence in this case was that the prosecutor did "charge more than the legal fare for conveying a passenger from one point to another in said city."
The regulation is fixed by the same ordinance as that sustained as reasonable in the Feretti case. Atlantic City v. Fonsler, ante p. 125.
There was abundant evidence to sustain the conviction in, this case.
The conviction is affirmed, with costs.