Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Straughn Samuel GORMAN, Claimant-Appellee, and $167,070.00 in United States Currency, Defendant; United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, Straughn Samuel Gorman, Claimant-Appellant, v. $167,070.00 in United States Currency, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-09-14
Citations: 870 F.3d 963
Docket Number: Nos. 15-16600; 15-17103; No. 15-16694
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Straughn Samuel GORMAN, Claimant-Appellee, and $167,070.00 in United States Currency, Defendant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, Straughn Samuel Gorman, Claimant-Appellant, v. $167,070.00 in United States Currency, Defendant.
Judges: Before: REINHARDT and BERZON, Circuit Judges, and MONTGOMERY, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 870
Pages: 963–963

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Straughn Samuel GORMAN, Claimant-Appellee, and $167,070.00 in United States Currency, Defendant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, Straughn Samuel Gorman, Claimant-Appellant, v. $167,070.00 in United States Currency, Defendant.
Nos. 15-16600
15-17103
No. 15-16694
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
SEPTEMBER 14, 2017
Gregory William Addington, Esquire, Assistant U.S. Attorney, USRE—Office of the US Attomey-Reno , Reno, NV, Plaintiff-Appellant.
Michael V. Cristalli, Gentile Cristalli Miller Armeni Savarese, Las Vegas, NV, Vincent Savarese, III, Esquire, Attorney, Vincent Savarese, Las Vegas, NV, for Claimant-Appellee.
Mahesha Subbaraman, Subbaraman PLLC, Minneapolis, MN 55402, for Ami-cus Curiae.
Before: REINHARDT and BERZON, Circuit Judges, and MONTGOMERY, District Judge.
The Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
ORDER
The opinion filed on June 12, 2017, United States v. Gorman, 859 F.3d 706 (9th Cir. 2017), is hereby amended to include Case Number 15-16694, the caption of which was inadvertently omitted from our original opinion.