Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nemecio Benitez NOZARIO, a/k/a Amigo, a/k/a Demecio, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-12-01
Citations: 403 F. App'x 789
Docket Number: No. 10-7045
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nemecio Benitez NOZARIO, a/k/a Amigo, a/k/a Demecio, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 403
Pages: 789–790

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nemecio Benitez NOZARIO, a/k/a Amigo, a/k/a Demecio, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-7045.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 18, 2010.
Decided: Dec. 1, 2010.
Nemecio Benitez Nozario, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Nemecio Benitez Nozario appeals the district court's orders denying his motion to compel the Government to file a Fed. R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion, and his subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Nozario, No. 5:06-cr-00285-F-3 (E.D.N.C. June 24 & July 15, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.