Case Name: David J. RAWLINS; Jacqueline A. Rawlins, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, a federal agency; Hector V. Barreto, in his official capacity as Administrator of the United States Small Business Administration, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-06-17
Citations: 36 F. App'x 635
Docket Number: No. 01-15365; D.C. No. CV-98-02199-FCD
Parties: David J. RAWLINS; Jacqueline A. Rawlins, Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, a federal agency; Hector V. Barreto, in his official capacity as Administrator of the United States Small Business Administration, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 36
Pages: 635–636

Head Matter:
David J. RAWLINS; Jacqueline A. Rawlins, Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, a federal agency; Hector V. Barreto, in his official capacity as Administrator of the United States Small Business Administration, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 01-15365.
D.C. No. CV-98-02199-FCD.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 10, 2002 .
Decided June 17, 2002.
Before O’SCANNLAIN, BERZON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Hector V. Barreto is substituted for Aida Alvarez as Administrator of the United States Small Business Administration pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
David J. and Jacqueline A. Rawlins, husband and wife, appeal the district court's summary judgment in favor of the United States Small Business Administration in their action seeking declaratory and in-junctive relief. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge's Findings and Recommendations filed on November 7, 2000, and adopted in the district court's order of December 20, 2000.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.