Case Name: Maurice Handman, Respondent, v. Parfums Lengyel, Ltd., Defendant, and George Lengyel et al., Appellants
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1947-05-23
Citations: 297 N.Y. 475
Docket Number: 
Parties: Maurice Handman, Respondent, v. Parfums Lengyel, Ltd., Defendant, and George Lengyel et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 297
Pages: 475–477

Head Matter:
Maurice Handman, Respondent, v. Parfums Lengyel, Ltd., Defendant, and George Lengyel et al., Appellants.
Argued April 17, 1947;
decided May 23, 1947.
Joseph 11. Miller for appellants.
Benjamin G. Ritman, Myron M. Fineman and Horace M. Gohen for respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment of the Appellate Division, insofar as it affirms the judgment of the Trial Term dismissing the counterclaim in defendants' second amended answer, affirmed, with costs. Appeal from that part of the judgment of the Appellate Division which affirms the order and judgment of the Trial Term granting plaintiff's motion to discontinue the action, dismissed, without costs, on the ground that such part of the judgment does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. (Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Hydrex Co., 214 N. Y. 622; Symington v. Symington, 244 N. Y. 553.) No opinion.
Concur: Loitghran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thacher, Dye and Fuld, JJ.