Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenneth Eugene MCDANIEL, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-02-25
Citations: 89 F. App'x 825
Docket Number: No. 03-7629
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenneth Eugene MCDANIEL, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 89
Pages: 825–825

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenneth Eugene MCDANIEL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 03-7629.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 19, 2004.
Decided Feb. 25, 2004.
Kenneth Eugene McDaniel, Appellant pro se. Robert James Conrad, Jr., United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Kenneth Eugene McDaniel appeals the district court's order denying his motion to reconsider a prior order denying his motion for specific performance of a plea agreement. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. McDaniel, Nos. CR-94-111; CA-00-90-3MU (W.D.N.C. Sept. 16, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED