Case Name: Rose Weylard, Respondent, v. William H. Kirchner, Appellant; Emil Weylard, Respondent, v. William H. Kirchner, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1915-10
Citations: 170 A.D. 961
Docket Number: 
Parties: Rose Weylard, Respondent, v. William H. Kirchner, Appellant. Emil Weylard, Respondent, v. William H. Kirchner, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 170
Pages: 961–961

Head Matter:
Rose Weylard, Respondent, v. William H. Kirchner, Appellant. Emil Weylard, Respondent, v. William H. Kirchner, Appellant.
Appeals from judgments of the County Court; Bronx county, entered in the Bronx county clerk’s office on the 26th day of February, 1915, upon verdicts, and also from orders entered on the 6th day of March, 1915, denying motions for new trial.

Opinion:
Per Curiam :
The judgment and order in each ease are reversed, with costs, on the ground that there was no evidence to sustain thejfinding of the jury that the defendant was guilty of negligence, and that finding is reversed and the complaint dismissed, with costs. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. In each case judgment and order reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.