Case Name: Leroy M. THURSTON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Herbert BESKINS; Steve Bennett; Helen P. Parrish, Defendants-Appellees, and Bill Moore; Jesse Franklin, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-05-10
Citations: 96 F. App'x 877
Docket Number: No. 04-1006
Parties: Leroy M. THURSTON, Jr., Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Herbert BESKINS; Steve Bennett; Helen P. Parrish, Defendants—Appellees, and Bill Moore; Jesse Franklin, Defendants.
Judges: Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 96
Pages: 877–877

Head Matter:
Leroy M. THURSTON, Jr., Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Herbert BESKINS; Steve Bennett; Helen P. Parrish, Defendants—Appellees, and Bill Moore; Jesse Franklin, Defendants.
No. 04-1006.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 8, 2004.
Decided May 10, 2004.
Leroy M. Thurston, Jr., Appellant pro se. Linda Davis Frith, Frith, Anderson & Peake, Roanoke, Virginia; James Morton Bowling, Iv, St. John, Bowling & Lawrence, Charlottesville, Virginia; Kevin Robert Huennekens, Maloney, Huennekens, Parks, Gecker & Parsons, Richmond, Virginia; Peter John Barrett, Kutak Rock, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Leroy M. Thurston, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying relief on his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Thurston's motion for counsel and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Thurston v. Beskins, No. CA-03-61 (W.D.Va. Nov. 24, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED