Case Name: Willie HOSKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1994-01-11
Citations: 867 S.W.2d 720
Docket Number: No. 63149
Parties: Willie HOSKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 867
Pages: 720–720

Head Matter:
Willie HOSKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 63149.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Jan. 11, 1994.
Willie Hoskins, pro se.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Traci J. Sanders, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
We find the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant's motion for postcon-viction relief as successive and untimely. Rule 29.15(k) and (m). We further find an opinion in this case would have no prece-dential purpose and affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum has been issued to the parties for their use only.