Case Name: Todd M. JACK, MS, PhD, Trustee, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. President Cutler DAWSON, Defendant-Appellee; Todd M. Jack, MS, PhD, Trustee, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. President Cutler Dawson, Defendant-Appellee; Todd M. Jack, MS, PhD, Trustee, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Cutler Dawson, President, Navy Federal Credit Union, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-09-03
Citations: 343 F. App'x 934
Docket Number: Nos. 09-1626, 09-1721, 09-1757
Parties: Todd M. JACK, MS, PhD, Trustee, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. President Cutler DAWSON, Defendant—Appellee. Todd M. Jack, MS, PhD, Trustee, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. President Cutler Dawson, Defendant—Appellee. Todd M. Jack, MS, PhD, Trustee, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Cutler Dawson, President, Navy Federal Credit Union, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before MICHAEL and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 343
Pages: 934–934

Head Matter:
Todd M. JACK, MS, PhD, Trustee, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. President Cutler DAWSON, Defendant—Appellee. Todd M. Jack, MS, PhD, Trustee, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. President Cutler Dawson, Defendant—Appellee. Todd M. Jack, MS, PhD, Trustee, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Cutler Dawson, President, Navy Federal Credit Union, Defendant—Appellee.
Nos. 09-1626, 09-1721, 09-1757.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 26, 2009.
Decided Sept. 3, 2009.
Todd M. Jack, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MICHAEL and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Todd M. Jack appeals the district court's orders dismissing these actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2006) for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jack v. Dawson, Nos. 5:09-cv-00031-gec, 5:09-cv-00038-gec, and 5:09-cv-00044-gec (W.D.Va. filed May 20, entered May 21, 2009); 2009 WL 1649702 (June 11, 2009); filed June 22, entered June 23, 2009. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.