Case Name: David BOXLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2011-11-15
Citations: 352 S.W.3d 683
Docket Number: No. ED 95794
Parties: David BOXLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 352
Pages: 683–683

Head Matter:
David BOXLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 95794.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Nov. 15, 2011.
Jessica M. Hathaway, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Dora A. Fichter, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
David Boxley ("Movant") appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The order of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).