Case Name: George C. Winchester, Resp't, v. T. Quincy Brown, App'lt
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1889-07-09
Citations: 26 N.Y. St. Rep. 154
Docket Number: 
Parties: George C. Winchester, Resp’t, v. T. Quincy Brown, App’lt.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 26
Pages: 154–154

Head Matter:
George C. Winchester, Resp’t, v. T. Quincy Brown, App’lt.
(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department,
Filed July 9, 1889.)
Undertaking — Appeal.
When an order for substitution of an undertaking is granted, and the surety fails to justify, the order on appeal should be affirmed, hut without costs. Daniels, J., dissenting.
Appeal from an order allowing an undertaking as security for costs, executed by the Fidelity and Casualty Company, to be substituted for a preceding undertaking proposed to be given in the action.
Henry Schmitt, for app’lt; A. W. Otis and T. S. Moore, for resp’t.

Opinion:
Van Brunt, P. J.
We see no error in allowing the substitution of the undertaking in question, but as in our judgment the substituted surety has failed to justify, the order should be affirmed without costs.
Brady, J., concurs.