Case Name: In the Matter of R. A., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. R. A., Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2013-05-30
Citations: 256 Or. App. 852
Docket Number: 120768154; A152295
Parties: In the Matter of R. A., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. R. A., Appellant.
Judges: Before Schuman, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Duncan, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 256
Pages: 852–853

Head Matter:
Submitted April 5,
reversed May 30, 2013
In the Matter of R. A., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. R. A., Appellant.
Multnomah County Circuit Court
120768154; A152295
302 P3d 482
Garrett A. Richardson and Multnomah Defenders, Inc., filed the brief for appellant.
Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General, and Inge D. Wells, Senior Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Schuman, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Duncan, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that, contrary to the trial court's ruling, the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that he is a danger to himself because of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(1)(e). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state's concession, and reverse.
Reversed.