Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eric J. MONTGOMERY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-07-27
Citations: 192 F. App'x 687
Docket Number: No. 05-10630
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Eric J. MONTGOMERY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: ALARCÓN, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 192
Pages: 687–688

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Eric J. MONTGOMERY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-10630.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 24, 2006.
Decided July 27, 2006.
Office of the U.S. Attorney, Fresno, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Mark A. Lizarraga, Fresno, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: ALARCÓN, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Eric J. Montgomery appeals the district court's order affirming the magistrate judge's denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized after he was stopped at an information station operated by the Bureau of Land Management in the Paradise Recreation Area. Montgomery contends that his Fourth Amendment rights were violated because the primary purpose of the information station was to address criminal wrongdoing, and because the gravity of the public concerns served by the stops at the station and the degree to which the stops advanced the public interest did not outweigh the severity of the interference with individual liberty. These contentions are foreclosed by United States v. Faulkner, 450 F.3d 466 (9th Cir.2006).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.