Case Name: Constanza S. ECHEVERRI, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Luis Enrique Parra, deceased, for the benefit of Claudia Parra, surviving minor child, Carolina Parra, surviving minor child, Juan Enrique Parra, surviving minor child, and the Estate of Luis Enrique Parra; Luis Sierra, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Marta Quiseno, deceased, Appellants, v. SAGA BAY COMPANY d/b/a Saga Lounge, a corporation; James B. Burgin, and Wayne William Warner, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-10-05
Citations: 624 So. 2d 416
Docket Number: Nos. 92-2611, 92-2588
Parties: Constanza S. ECHEVERRI, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Luis Enrique Parra, deceased, for the benefit of Claudia Parra, surviving minor child, Carolina Parra, surviving minor child, Juan Enrique Parra, surviving minor child, and the Estate of Luis Enrique Parra; Luis Sierra, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Marta Quiseno, deceased, Appellants, v. SAGA BAY COMPANY d/b/a Saga Lounge, a corporation; James B. Burgin, and Wayne William Warner, Appellees.
Judges: Before NESBITT, BASKIN and COPE, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 624
Pages: 416–417

Head Matter:
Constanza S. ECHEVERRI, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Luis Enrique Parra, deceased, for the benefit of Claudia Parra, surviving minor child, Carolina Parra, surviving minor child, Juan Enrique Parra, surviving minor child, and the Estate of Luis Enrique Parra; Luis Sierra, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Marta Quiseno, deceased, Appellants, v. SAGA BAY COMPANY d/b/a Saga Lounge, a corporation; James B. Burgin, and Wayne William Warner, Appellees.
Nos. 92-2611, 92-2588.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 5, 1993.
Rossman & Baumberger, Cooper & Wolfe and Marc Cooper and David H. Pollack, Smith & Gellman, Miami, Russo, Talisman & Moylan and Shiela Moylan, Coconut Grove, for appellants.
David R. Howland, Coral Gables, and Philip Glatzer, Miami, for appellees.
Before NESBITT, BASKIN and COPE, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court's orders dismissing the action against James Burgin. The complaint fails to state a cause of action against Burgin, individually, for violation of section 768.125, Florida Statutes (1989). See Ellis v. N.G.N. of Tampa, Inc., 586 So.2d 1042 (Fla.1991); McDaniel v. Sheffield, 431 So.2d 230 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 440 So.2d 352 (Fla.1983).
Affirmed.