Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Lee WEINBERG, Appellant; UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. David Alfred SCHEFFLER, Appellant; UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Teri Ann VOLPIN, Appellant; UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Karen DUNCAN, Appellant; UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Pamela DONALDSON, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1970-12-23
Citations: 436 F.2d 416
Docket Number: No. 26903, Misc. Nos. 5484-5487
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Lee WEINBERG, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. David Alfred SCHEFFLER, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Teri Ann VOLPIN, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Karen DUNCAN, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Pamela DONALDSON, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 436
Pages: 416–418

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Lee WEINBERG, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. David Alfred SCHEFFLER, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Teri Ann VOLPIN, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Karen DUNCAN, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Pamela DONALDSON, Appellant.
No. 26903, Misc. Nos. 5484-5487.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Dec. 23, 1970.
Concurring Opinion Jan. 11, 1971.
Jerald E. Olson, Asst. U. S. Atty., Seattle, Wash., for appellants.
Warren H. Ploeger, James E. Nelson, J. Fred Simpson, Seattle, Wash., for ap-pellee.
Before HAMLEY and HUFSTED-LER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The motions of the above-named appellants for admission to bail pending disposition of their appeals from district court orders adjudging them to be in civil contempt of court for refusing to testify before a Federal Grand Jury presently convened in Tucson, Arizona, and committing them to the custody of the United States Marshal for the District of Arizona for the life of the grand jury sitting at Tucson, or until March 31, 1971, whichever occurs first, or until such time as they purge themselves of the contempt, is granted.
Each of the named appellants shall be immediately released on his or her own recognizance or, in the discretion of the district court, released into the custody of one of his or her attorneys, pending disposition of their appeals, Provided, that this order is subject to reconsideration upon request of the United States filed on or before January 4, 1971.