Case Name: Wayne Allen KELLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1984-02-24
Citations: 445 So. 2d 701
Docket Number: No. 83-1169
Parties: Wayne Allen KELLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: HOBSON, A.C.J., and RYDER and LE-HAN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 445
Pages: 701–702

Head Matter:
Wayne Allen KELLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 83-1169.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Feb. 24, 1984.
Jerry Hill, Public Defender, and L.S. Al-perstein, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Davis G. Anderson, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in not admitting the proffered testimony which would have been cumulative. See Sheppard v. State, 322 So.2d 628 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Smith v. State, 320 So.2d 420 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975).
HOBSON, A.C.J., and RYDER and LE-HAN, JJ., concur.