Case Name: Genevieve Coffey, Respondent, v. William Brodsky, Individually and Doing Business as Broad-Sky Properties, Appellant, et al., Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2000-12-04
Citations: 278 A.D.2d 191
Docket Number: 
Parties: Genevieve Coffey, Respondent, v William Brodsky, Individually and Doing Business as Broad-Sky Properties, Appellant, et al., Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 278
Pages: 191–191

Head Matter:
Genevieve Coffey, Respondent, v William Brodsky, Individually and Doing Business as Broad-Sky Properties, Appellant, et al., Defendant.
[716 NYS2d 902]

Opinion:
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for injury to real property, the defendant, William Brodsky, individually and d/b/a Broad-Sky Properties, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rock-land County (Bergerman, J.), dated December 3, 1999, which granted the plaintiffs motion to add Rockhill Building Corporation as an additional defendant.
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
The appellant, William Brodsky, individually and d/b/a Broad-Sky Properties is not aggrieved by the order which granted the plaintiffs motion to add Rockhill Building Corporation as an additional defendant under the relation-back doctrine (see, Poulard v Papamihlopoulos, 254 AD2d 266). Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed. Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Sullivan and McGinity, JJ., concur.