Case Name: Margaret Loughlin, Respondent, v. City of New York, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1946-05-13
Citations: 270 A.D. 941
Docket Number: 
Parties: Margaret Loughlin, Respondent, v. City of New York, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 270
Pages: 941–941

Head Matter:
Margaret Loughlin, Respondent, v. City of New York, Appellant.

Opinion:
Action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered as a consequence of a fall on a wet subway platform. Plaintiff recovered a judgment and defendant appeals. Judgment reversed on the law, with costs, and the complaint dismissed on the law, with costs. The findings of fact implicit in the verdict are affirmed. No negligence on the part of the defendant was established. (Brand V. Inter-borough B. T. Go., 249 App. Div. 630, affd. 273 N. Y. 658; Abair v. City of New York, 295 N. Y. 789; Boettcher v. Dowling, 270 N. Y. 557.) The case.of Bordes v. Murray (284 N. Y. 761) is not to the contrary and may be distinguished on its facts. Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Aldrich and Nolan, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 1025.]