Case Name: MAHIN v. MAHIN
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1936-07-22
Citations: 169 So. 665
Docket Number: 
Parties: MAHIN v. MAHIN.
Judges: WHITFIELD, C. J., and ELLIS, TERRELL, BROWN, BUFORD, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter
Volume: 169
Pages: 665–665

Head Matter:
MAHIN v. MAHIN.
Supreme Court of Florida.
July 22, 1936.
Rehearing Denied Sept. 10, 1936.
Fielding & Duncan and Adkins & Ar-now, all of Gainesville, for appellant.
Scruggs & Sobol and Fred D. Bryant, all of Gainesville, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said order. It is therefore considered, ordered, and de.creed by the court that the said order of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed on the authority of Braswell v. Downs, 11 Fla. 62; McCamy v. Payne, 94 Fla. 209, 113 So. 712.
WHITFIELD, C. J., and ELLIS, TERRELL, BROWN, BUFORD, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.