Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darryl Lamonte HERNDON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-06-19
Citations: 37 F. App'x 673
Docket Number: No. 02-6648
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darryl Lamonte HERNDON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 37
Pages: 673–674

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darryl Lamonte HERNDON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-6648.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted June 13, 2002.
Decided June 19, 2002.
Darryl Lamonte Herndon, Appellant Pro Se. Craig Jon Jacobsen, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Darryl Lamonte Herndon seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Hern don, Nos. CR-99-58; CA-01-148-7 (W.D.Va. Mar. 15, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.