Case Name: State of Nebraska, appellee, v. Kevin L. Laue, appellant
Court: Nebraska Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Nebraska
Decision Date: 1987-05-29
Citations: 225 Neb. 526
Docket Number: No. 86-733
Parties: State of Nebraska, appellee, v. Kevin L. Laue, appellant.
Judges: • Krivosha, C.J., Boslaugh, White, Hastings, Caporale, Shanahan, and Grant, J J.
Reporter: Nebraska Reports
Volume: 225
Pages: 526–526

Head Matter:
State of Nebraska, appellee, v. Kevin L. Laue, appellant.
406 N.W.2d 345
Filed May 29, 1987.
No. 86-733.
Thomas L. Morrissey of Morrissey, Morrissey & Dalluge, for appellant.
Robert M. Spire, Attorney General, and Elaine A. Catlin, for appellee.
• Krivosha, C.J., Boslaugh, White, Hastings, Caporale, Shanahan, and Grant, J J.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This matter came before the court for consideration of appellant's motion for rehearing, which claims that our opinion in State v. Laue, ante p. 57, 402 N.W.2d 313 (1987), erroneously recited at 59, 402 N.W.2d at 315, that the patrol car "had its engine running" when no such evidence appeared in the record, and, further, that we incorrectly recited at 60, 402 N.W.2d at 315, that the trooper said to the defendant, "[I]t didn't quite make it to the ditch."
Upon reexamination of the record, at page 27, line 13, of the bill of exceptions, during cross-examination of the trooper by the appellant's counsel, the question was asked, "Now, in the time it took him to do that you went and got in your car; was you [sic] car — engine already started?" to which the witness responded, "Yes, it was," and at page 18, line 24, the question was asked, "And, the statement was?" and the answer given was "That it didn't quite make it to the ditch."
The court finds that there is no basis in fact, or in law, to support the allegations of the appellant's motion for rehearing.
It is therefore ordered that the motion for rehearing be, and the same is, overruled.
Motion overruled.