Case Name: Kenneth STUDWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHIEF WARDEN; Page Tunr; Unit Wilmouth; Counselor McLauran; Dr. Holaran, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-02-13
Citations: 55 F. App'x 712
Docket Number: No. 03-6049
Parties: Kenneth STUDWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHIEF WARDEN; Page Tunr; Unit Wilmouth; Counselor McLauran; Dr. Holaran, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 55
Pages: 712–713

Head Matter:
Kenneth STUDWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHIEF WARDEN; Page Tunr; Unit Wilmouth; Counselor McLauran; Dr. Holaran, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 03-6049.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 6, 2003.
Decided Feb. 13, 2003.
Kenneth Studwell, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Kenneth Studwell appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Studwell v. Chief Warden, No. CA-02-298 (E.D.Va. Dec. 11, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.