Case Name: Larry WILKES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-01-15
Citations: 64 S.W.3d 880
Docket Number: Nos. ED 79566, ED 79671
Parties: Larry WILKES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, Jr., P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 64
Pages: 880–881

Head Matter:
Larry WILKES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Nos. ED 79566, ED 79671.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Jan. 15, 2002.
Larry Wilkes, Jefferson City, MO, pro se.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Nicole E. Gorovsky, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, Jr., P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Larry Wilkes, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties and find that the motion court's judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).