Case Name: Edith BOTTOM, Appellant, v. Charles Yancy BYBEE et al., Appellees
Court: Kentucky Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Kentucky
Decision Date: 1962-06-15
Citations: 358 S.W.2d 542
Docket Number: 
Parties: Edith BOTTOM, Appellant, v. Charles Yancy BYBEE et al., Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 358
Pages: 542–542

Head Matter:
Edith BOTTOM, Appellant, v. Charles Yancy BYBEE et al., Appellees.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky.
June 15, 1962.
Leonard E. Wilson, Jamestown, for appellant.
Bell, Orr & Reynolds, Charles Reynolds, Bowling Green, Fred Faulkner, Jr., Camp-bellsville, for appellees.

Opinion:
WILLIAMS, Judge.
Following opening statement to the jury by counsel for appellant, the Green Circuit Court directed a verdict for the ap-pellees. On appeal to this Court appellant designated only certain parts of the record, and did not serve with the designation a concise statement of points on which she intended to rely. Appellees' motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground a concise statement of points was not served was overruled by this Court. The appellees now argue that the points raised on the appeal are such that, had they been advised of them, they would have filed a counter-designation and brought up other portions of the record. They again insist that the appeal should be dismissed. Upon reconsideration, we agree.
In Knight v. Resolute Insurance Company, Ky., 321 S.W.2d 255, we said:
"Inasmuch as appellant has designated only certain parts of the record in the case for inclusion in the record on appeal, we are dismissing the appeal for failure to serve with the designation a concise statement of points as is required by CR 75.04."
Taylor v. Warman, Ky., 331 S.W.2d 899; Wallace v. Walters & Keene Motor Company, Ky, 280 S.W.2d 493.
Wherefore, the appeal is dismissed.