Case Name: MARTIN E. RAY et al., Petitioners, v. CALIFORNIA HOME BUILDING LOAN COMPANY, etc., et al., Respondents
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1935-05-31
Citations: 7 Cal. App. 2d 275
Docket Number: Civ. No. 9890
Parties: MARTIN E. RAY et al., Petitioners, v. CALIFORNIA HOME BUILDING LOAN COMPANY, etc., et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports, Second Series
Volume: 7
Pages: 275–276

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 9890.
First Appellate District, Division One.
May 31, 1935.]
MARTIN E. RAY et al., Petitioners, v. CALIFORNIA HOME BUILDING LOAN COMPANY, etc., et al., Respondents.
Ellis, Lyman & Steindorf for Petitioners.
No appearance for Respondents.

Opinion:
THE COURT.
Ordinarily mcun4amus will not lie to compel a transfer of corporate stock; a suit in equity is the proper remedy. There is nothing contained in the petition to show that this remedy is inadequate. (Spangenberg v. Western Heavy Hardware & Iron Co., 166 Cal. 284 [135 Pac. 1127].) The petition is denied.