Case Name: Larry GRIFFIN, a/k/a Larry Gene Griffin, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1976-07-21
Citations: 335 So. 2d 348
Docket Number: No. 75-341
Parties: Larry GRIFFIN, a/k/a Larry Gene Griffin, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: McNULTY, C. J., and HOBSON and BOARDMAN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 335
Pages: 348–349

Head Matter:
Larry GRIFFIN, a/k/a Larry Gene Griffin, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 75-341.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
July 21, 1976.
James A. Gardner, Public Defender, Sarasota, and William A. Dooley, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert J. Landry, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant was indicted for second-degree murder and charged by information with robbery and auto theft. After trial the jury found the appellant guilty of manslaughter, robbery and auto theft. In this timely appeal appellant contends that the verdicts of manslaughter and robbery are inconsistent with one another, and therefore the sentence for robbery must be set aside and vacated.
This precise issue was recently resolved adversely to appellant's contention by the Supreme Court of Florida in McCloud v. State, Fla.1976, 335 So.2d 257. The supreme court in the cited case recognized that the guilty verdicts for manslaughter and robbery were inconsistent, nevertheless the convictions were affirmed.
The second point on appeal is without merit.
AFFIRMED.
McNULTY, C. J., and HOBSON and BOARDMAN, JJ., concur.