Case Name: Peter F. Lynch, Respondent, v. George D. Bailey et al., Doing Business as Touche, Niven, Bailey & Smart, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1951-11-27
Citations: 279 A.D. 650
Docket Number: 
Parties: Peter F. Lynch, Respondent, v. George D. Bailey et al., Doing Business as Touche, Niven, Bailey & Smart, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 279
Pages: 650–650

Head Matter:
Peter F. Lynch, Respondent, v. George D. Bailey et al., Doing Business as Touche, Niven, Bailey & Smart, Appellants.

Opinion:
Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Callahan, J., dissents and votes to reverse and deny the motion in the following memorandum: In the prior action, the plaintiff sought an injunction as well as declaratory judgment and he might have secured damages in that suit and the judgment is, therefore, res judicata. [See post, p. 789.]