Case Name: Melicia LYTLE, Employee/Claimant/Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Employer/Respondent, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri, as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Additional Party/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-03-20
Citations: 365 S.W.3d 254
Docket Number: No. ED 97210
Parties: Melicia LYTLE, Employee/Claimant/Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Employer/Respondent, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri, as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Additional Party/Respondent.
Judges: Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J. and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 365
Pages: 254–255

Head Matter:
Melicia LYTLE, Employee/Claimant/Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Employer/Respondent, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri, as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Additional Party/Respondent.
No. ED 97210.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
March 20, 2012.
Kurt C. Hoener, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Thomas J. Goeddel, Atty. For City of St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.
Michael T. Finneran, St. Louis, MO, for Second Injury Fund.
Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J. and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Melicia Lytle appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming and incorporating the decision of the Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") in the Division of Workers' Compensation denying compensation. The Commission's decision was supported by competent and substantial evidence in the record.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The decision of the Commission is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).