Case Name: Maykel Omar PERDOMO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2007-03-07
Citations: 960 So. 2d 11
Docket Number: No. 3D06-594
Parties: Maykel Omar PERDOMO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before COPE, C.J., and CORTIÑAS and ROTHENBERG, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 960
Pages: 11–12

Head Matter:
Maykel Omar PERDOMO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D06-594.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 7, 2007.
Martin J. Beguiristain, Miami, for appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General and Laura Moszer, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before COPE, C.J., and CORTIÑAS and ROTHENBERG, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm as the defendant's Motion for Discharge did not, as a matter of law, constitute a "Notice of Expiration of Speedy Trial Time" as contemplated by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191(p)(2). Clark v. State, 698 So.2d 1274, 1275 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).
Affirmed.