Case Name: Pedro J. SENTENO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-09-08
Citations: 768 So. 2d 523
Docket Number: No. 2D99-3708
Parties: Pedro J. SENTENO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and WHATLEY, J., and DANAHY, PAUL W., (Senior) Judge, Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 768
Pages: 523–523

Head Matter:
Pedro J. SENTENO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D99-3708.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Sept. 8, 2000.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Richard J. Sanders, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robert J. Krauss, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Chief of Criminal Law, Tampa, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the sentence entered in this case on remand from the first appeal. See Senteno v. State, 737 So.2d 1120 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). We reverse the judgment entered on remand' as to count six because that judgment does not comply with the opinion that we issued in the first appeal. On remand, the trial court shall enter a new judgment accurately stating the convictions permitted by our last opinion.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and WHATLEY, J., and DANAHY, PAUL W., (Senior) Judge, Concur.