Case Name: UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Specialist Four Gregory D. SANDERS, [ XXX-XX-XXXX ], United States Army, Appellant
Court: United States Army Court of Military Review
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1985-02-28
Citations: 19 M.J. 979
Docket Number: No. SPCM 19863
Parties: UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Specialist Four Gregory D. SANDERS, [ XXX-XX-XXXX ], United States Army, Appellant.
Judges: Before WOLD, NAUGHTON and COHEN, Appellate Military Judges.
Reporter: West's Military Justice Reporter
Volume: 19
Pages: 979–980

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Specialist Four Gregory D. SANDERS, [ XXX-XX-XXXX ], United States Army, Appellant.
No. SPCM 19863.
U.S. Army Court of Military Review.
28 Feb. 1985.
Major Robert M. Ott, JAGC, Major Stephen R. Dooley, JAGC, and Captain Paul E. Conrad, JAGC, were on the pleadings for appellant.
Colonel James Kucera, JAGC, Lieutenant Colonel John T. Edwards, JAGC, Major Patrick M. Flachs, JAGC, and Captain Daniel N. Veiling, JAGC, were on the pleadings for appellee.
Before WOLD, NAUGHTON and COHEN, Appellate Military Judges.
. Judge Robert E. Cohen took final action on this case prior to his retirement from active service.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
NAUGHTON, Judge:
Appellant contends that he was prejudiced by the sentence limitation terms of the pretrial agreement which were operative only if a punitive discharge was adjudged. In light of United States v. Castleberry, 18 M.J. 826 (ACMR 1984), and United States v. Holmes, 17 M.J. 830 (ACMR), pet. denied, 18 M.J. 438 (CMA 1984), we find this contention to be without merit. Such provisions are not violative of public policy. We have considered the remaining assignments of error and find them to be without merit.
The findings of guilty and the sentence are affirmed.
Judge COHEN concurs.