Case Name: Amstutz v. King et al.
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1921-06-21
Citations: 103 Ohio St. 674
Docket Number: Nos. 16285 and 16286
Parties: Amstutz v. King et al.
Judges: Marshall, C. J., Robinson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, New Service
Volume: 103
Pages: 674–674

Head Matter:
Amstutz v. King et al.
Physician and patient — •Malpractice — Cause of action accrues, when — Statute of limitations — Section 11225, General Code.
(Nos. 16285 and 16286
Decided June 21, 1921.)
Error to the Court of Appeals of Stark county.
Mr. B. F. Enos and Messrs. Webber & Turner, for plaintiffs in error.
Messrs. Hart & Koehler and Messrs. Lynch, Day, Fimple & Lynch, for defendants in error.
Messrs. Smith, Baker, Effler, Allen & Eastman, amici curiae in Case No. 16286.

Opinion:
Judgments affirmed on authority of Gillette v. Tucker, 67 Ohio St., 106, and Bowers v. Santee, 99 Ohio St., 361.
Judgments affirmed.
Marshall, C. J., Robinson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.
Johnson, Hough and Wanamaker, JJ., dissent.