Case Name: Floyd Thomas KENNEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-12-31
Citations: 611 So. 2d 575
Docket Number: No. 92-544
Parties: Floyd Thomas KENNEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: MINER and KAHN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 611
Pages: 575–577

Head Matter:
Floyd Thomas KENNEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 92-544.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Dec. 31, 1992.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Sara D. Baggett, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this appeal of a criminal conviction, we must reject appellant's contention that the trial court failed to conduct the inquiry required by Nelson v. State, 274 So.2d 256 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973). While appellant expressed dissatisfaction with his lawyer during the trial, such dissatisfaction was based solely upon a claim that the lawyer had not made adequate visits to the jail. Appellant raised no instance of incompetence or inadequacy in the lawyer's handling of the defense. Since no error is shown, the convictions and sentences are affirmed. Watts v. State, 593 So.2d 198 (Fla.1992), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 3006, 120 L.Ed.2d 881 (1992); Johnson v. State, 560 So.2d 1239 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).
MINER and KAHN, JJ., concur.
ALLEN, J., dissents with written opinion.