Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Tony HARRIS, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2007-05-09
Citations: 221 S.W.3d 450
Docket Number: No. ED 88354
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Tony HARRIS, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., and MARY K. HOFF, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 221
Pages: 450–451

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Tony HARRIS, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 88354.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
May 9, 2007.
Jessica M. Hathaway, Office of the State Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Joshua N. Corman; Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., and MARY K. HOFF, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Tony Harris (Defendant) appeals from the trial court's judgment and sentence imposed after a jury found him guilty of one count of first-degree robbery, in violation of Section 569.020; one count of attempted first-degree robbery, in violation of Section 564.011; and two counts of armed criminal action, in violation of Section 571.015. After finding beyond a reasonable doubt that Defendant was a prior and persistent offender, subject to an enhanced term of imprisonment, the trial court sentenced Defendant to concurrent terms of fifteen years on the robbery count, fifteen years on the attempted robbery count, and five years on each of the armed criminal action counts. This appeal follows.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
. All statutory references are to RSMo 2000, unless otherwise indicated.