Case Name: Louise Magnotti v. Elizabeth O'Brasky et al.
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1970-02-05
Citations: 159 Conn. 607
Docket Number: 
Parties: Louise Magnotti v. Elizabeth O’Brasky et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 159
Pages: 607–608

Head Matter:
Louise Magnotti v. Elizabeth O’Brasky et al.
Alcorn, House, Thim, Ryan and Shapiro, Js.
Argued February 5
decided February 5, 1970
Andrew D. Dawson, for the appellant (plaintiff).
John C. Flanagan, with whom, on the brief, was Peter C. Dorsey, for the appellees (defendants).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The sole issue raised on this appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying the motion by the plaintiff to set aside the verdict as inadequate. The plaintiff's claims of injury and damages were strongly contested. It was the function of the jury to determine the credibility of the witnesses and the weight to be accorded their testimony. There is nothing in the record to indicate that the verdict returned was not reasonably reached upon a proper consideration of all the evidence.
There is no error.