Case Name: E. L. LONG v. STATE
Court: Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1920-10-02
Citations: 17 Okla. Crim. 739
Docket Number: No. A-3378
Parties: E. L. LONG v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: Oklahoma Criminal Reports
Volume: 17
Pages: 739–739

Head Matter:
E. L. LONG v. STATE.
No. A-3378.
Opinion Filed October 2, 1920.
(192 Pac. 428.)
Appeal from District Court, Tulsa County; N. E. McNeill, Judge.
E. L. Long was convicted' of a second violation of the prohibitory liquor law, and he appeals.
Reversed.
See, also, 192 Pac. 427.
P. P. Nelson, John S. Hale, D. M. Martindale, and R. K. Robertson, for plaintiff in error.
S. P. Freeling, Atty. Gen., and W. C. Hall, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM..
Plaintiff in error, E. L. Long, was convicted of having on the 9th day of October, 1917, intoxicating liquors in his possession with the intent to sell the same and alleging said offense to be the second offense, said defendant having been convicted in the county court of Tulsa county on the 11th day of May, 1917, of the same offense. Prom the judgment rendered on the verdict he appeals. This is a companion case of Long v. State, 17 Okla. Cr.-, 192 Pac. 427. this day decided. The Attorney General has filed a confession of error based on the same exceptions, and the judgment must be reversed on the authority of McAlester v. State, 16 Okl. Cr. 70, 180 Pac. 718.
Accordingly the judgment is reversed.