Case Name: Dale Frank MAISANO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRANS CAR INC., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-02-25
Citations: 416 F. App'x 605
Docket Number: No. 07-56860
Parties: Dale Frank MAISANO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRANS CAR INC., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 416
Pages: 605–606

Head Matter:
Dale Frank MAISANO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRANS CAR INC., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 07-56860.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 15, 2011.
Filed Feb. 25, 2011.
Dale Frank Maisano, Yuma, AZ, pro se.
Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Dale Frank Maisano, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court's order denying his application to proceed in forma pauperis. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion, O'Loughlin v. Doe, 920 F.2d 614, 616 (9th Cir.1990), and we affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Maisano's application because he failed to submit the required six-month prisoner trust fund account statement. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1139 (9th Cir.2000) ("[P]risoner-plaintiffs seeking to proceed in forma pauperis [must] submit a certified copy of their prisoner trust fund account statement for the previous six months.").
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.