Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ponciano Bautista ARELLANO, also known as Ponciano Arellano Bautista, also known as Ponciano Bautista-Arellanos, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-08-22
Citations: 579 F. App'x 247
Docket Number: No. 14-20038
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ponciano Bautista ARELLANO, also known as Ponciano Arellano Bautista, also known as Ponciano Bautista-Arellanos, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before REAVLEY, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 579
Pages: 247–247

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ponciano Bautista ARELLANO, also known as Ponciano Arellano Bautista, also known as Ponciano Bautista-Arellanos, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 14-20038
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 22, 2014.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, H. Michael Sokolow, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, Ponciano Bautista Arellano, Cl Big Spring, Big Spring, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before REAVLEY, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ponciano Bautista Arellano has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Arellano has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.