Case Name: Clifton PITTS, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Cross-Appellant
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2001-05-16
Citations: 787 So. 2d 195
Docket Number: No. 2D99-3912
Parties: Clifton PITTS, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
Judges: SALCINES and STRINGER, JJ„ Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 787
Pages: 195–196

Head Matter:
Clifton PITTS, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
No. 2D99-3912.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
May 16, 2001.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and William L. Sharwell, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and John M. Klawikofsky, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Clifton Pitts appeals his convictions for burglary of an unoccupied dwelling and criminal mischief. We see no reversible error and, therefore, affirm. The State cross-appeals from the trial court's failure to impose a prison releasee reoffender sentence. We affirm based on the supreme court's recent decision in State v. Huggins, 26 Fla. L. Weekly S174, — So.2d —, 2001 WL 278107 (Fla. Mar. 22, 2001) (holding that Prison Releasee Reoffender Punishment Act does not apply to burglary of an unoccupied dwelling).
Affirmed.
SALCINES and STRINGER, JJ" Concur.
BLUE, A.C.J., Concurs specially with opinion.