Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jack Daniel NADEAU, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1971-05-11
Citations: 442 F.2d 362
Docket Number: No. 26007
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jack Daniel NADEAU, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 442
Pages: 362–362

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jack Daniel NADEAU, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 26007.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 11, 1971.
John E. Thorne, of Thorne, Stanton, Clopton, Herz & Stanek, San Jose, Cal., for appellant.
James L. Browning, Jr., U. S. Atty., Jerrold M. Ladar, Chief, Crim. Div., James L. Hazard, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.
Before MERRILL and ELY, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, District Judge.
Honorable William J. Jameson, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appellant's contention that his conscientious objector claim should have been considered by his local board is disposed of by Ehlert v. United States, 401 U.S. -, 91 S.Ct. 1319, 28 L.Ed.2d 625 (1971).
His contention that the local board was improperly constituted is disposed of by United States v. Nix, 437 F.2d 746 (9th Cir. 1971); United States v. Wallace, 435 F.2d 12, 14-15 (9th Cir. 1970).
Judgment affirmed.