Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Carlos WILLIS, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-01-09
Citations: 34 S.W.3d 871
Docket Number: No. ED 76976
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Carlos WILLIS, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., P.J., and MARY RHODES RUSSELL and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 34
Pages: 871–872

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Carlos WILLIS, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 76976.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Jan. 9, 2001.
Douglas R. Hoff, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., P.J., and MARY RHODES RUSSELL and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant Carlos Willis appeals the judgment of conviction entered for possession of a controlled substance in violation of Section 195.202, RSMo 1994. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).