Case Name: James J. Mead, Appellant, v. Karen E. Bloom et al., Defendants, and Hallman-Adkins Chevrolet, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1984-05-17
Citations: 62 N.Y.2d 788
Docket Number: 
Parties: James J. Mead, Appellant, v Karen E. Bloom et al., Defendants, and Hallman-Adkins Chevrolet, Respondent.
Judges: Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Meyer, Simons and Kaye. Judge Wachtler dissents and votes to reverse in an opinion.
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 62
Pages: 788–796

Head Matter:
James J. Mead, Appellant, v Karen E. Bloom et al., Defendants, and Hallman-Adkins Chevrolet, Respondent.
Argued March 29, 1984;
decided May 17, 1984
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Richard T. Farrell, Paul William Beltz and Anne M. Beltz for appellant.
Dale Thuillez and Joseph DeMarie for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the opinion by Justice James H. Boomer at the Appellate Division (94 AD2d 423).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Meyer, Simons and Kaye. Judge Wachtler dissents and votes to reverse in an opinion.