Case Name: Moe Hirsch et al., Appellants, v. Peekskill Ranch, Inc., et al., Defendants, and Richard W. Fulfree, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1985-07-08
Citations: 112 A.D.2d 191
Docket Number: 
Parties: Moe Hirsch et al., Appellants, v Peekskill Ranch, Inc., et al., Defendants, and Richard W. Fulfree, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 112
Pages: 191–192

Head Matter:
Moe Hirsch et al., Appellants, v Peekskill Ranch, Inc., et al., Defendants, and Richard W. Fulfree, Respondent.

Opinion:
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.), dated July 26, 1984, which directed that a hearing be conducted to determine the receiver's claim for reimbursement for necessary expenditures.
Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
An order directing a judicial hearing to aid in the disposi tion of a motion does not affect a substantial right (see, CPLR 5701 [a] [2] [v]) and therefore is not appealable as of right (see, De Santis v De Santis, 107 AD2d 734; Warner v Warner, 88 AD2d 639; Bagdy v Progresso Foods Corp., 86 AD2d 589). Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Niehoff and Rubin, JJ., concur.