Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Anthony W. ESPOSITO, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2009-01-20
Citations: 280 S.W.3d 102
Docket Number: No. ED 90831
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Anthony W. ESPOSITO, Appellant.
Judges: Before KURT S. ODENWALD, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 280
Pages: 102–102

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Anthony W. ESPOSITO, Appellant.
No. ED 90831.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Jan. 20, 2009.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 10, 2009.
Application for Transfer Denied May 5, 2009.
Kent Denzel, Office of the Missouri Public Defender, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Richard A. Starnes, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before KURT S. ODENWALD, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Anthony Esposito appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Lincoln County, following a jury trial, convicting him of one count of attempt to manufacture a controlled substance, in violation of Section 195.211, RSMo 2000, and one count of possession of a controlled substance, in violation of Section 195.202. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
. All subsequent statutory citations are to RSMo 2000, unless otherwise indicated.