Case Name: Kaleab GEBREWOLDE, a/k/a Kaleab Grewolde, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-11-04
Citations: 400 F. App'x 718
Docket Number: No. 09-2028
Parties: Kaleab GEBREWOLDE, a/k/a Kaleab Grewolde, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, GREGORY, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 400
Pages: 718–718

Head Matter:
Kaleab GEBREWOLDE, a/k/a Kaleab Grewolde, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 09-2028.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 18, 2010.
Decided: Nov. 4, 2010.
James Feroli, Immigrant and Refugee Appellate Center, Alexandria, Virginia, for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division, Terri J. Sca-dron, Assistant Director, Office of Immigration Litigation, Wendy Benner-León, Trial Attorney, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, GREGORY, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Petition granted and remanded by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kaleab Gebrewolde, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("Board") dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge's order finding he was not credible and denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and withholding of removal under the Convention Against Torture ("CAT"). The Court grants the petition for review and remands to the Board for reconsideration of Gebre-wolde's claims in light of Kourouma v. Holder, 588 F.3d 234 (4th Cir.2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION GRANTED AND REMANDED.