Case Name: Audrey PRIESTER, Appellant, v. Sarah M. RATLIEFF, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-12-28
Citations: 572 So. 2d 1003
Docket Number: No. 89-2166
Parties: Audrey PRIESTER, Appellant, v. Sarah M. RATLIEFF, Appellee.
Judges: ANSTEAD and STONE, JJ., and FENNELLY, JOHN E., Associate Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 572
Pages: 1003–1004

Head Matter:
Audrey PRIESTER, Appellant, v. Sarah M. RATLIEFF, Appellee.
No. 89-2166.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Dec. 28, 1990.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 8, 1991.
Gary Roberts of Cone & Roberts, P.A., and Philip M. Burlington of Edna L. Caruso, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Daniel M. Bachi of Sellars, Supran, Cole, Marion & Espy, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. We find no error by the trial court in concluding that the issue as to the cause of the accident in question should be decided by the jury in light of all the circumstances shown to have prevailed at the time. See Tellechea v. Coca Cola Bottling Co. of Miami, Inc., 530 So.2d 1083 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).
ANSTEAD and STONE, JJ., and FENNELLY, JOHN E., Associate Judge, concur.