Case Name: James R. BLACK, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2014-08-26
Citations: 439 S.W.3d 298
Docket Number: No. ED 100433
Parties: James R. BLACK, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and PHILIP M. HESS, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 439
Pages: 298–298

Head Matter:
James R. BLACK, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 100433.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Aug. 26, 2014.
Susan Kreher Roach, Clayton, MO, for appellant.
Deborah C.M. Henry, Stewart, Mittle-man, Heggie, Henry & Albín, LLC, Clayton, MO, for respondent.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and PHILIP M. HESS, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
James R. Black (Movant) appeals from the motion court's Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (judgment) on Mov-ant's Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence denying Movant's Rule 29.15 claims for post-conviction relief. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).