Case Name: Chairty Lane FURR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2017-03-20
Citations: 212 So. 3d 544
Docket Number: CASE NO. 1D14-0308
Parties: Chairty Lane FURR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ROBERTS, C.J., WOLF and LEWIS, JJ., CONCUR.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 212
Pages: 544–545

Head Matter:
Chairty Lane FURR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CASE NO. 1D14-0308
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Opinion filed March 20, 2017.
Andy Thomas, Public Defender-, and Mark V. Murray, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Giselle D. Lylen, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
PER CURIAM.
We originally reversed the appellant's conviction for manslaughter with a firearm based on this Court's decision in Floyd v. State, 151 So.3d 452 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (Floyd I). Thereafter, the Florida Supreme Court quashed our opinion in Floyd I and remanded for reconsideration upon appli cation of its decision in State v. Floyd, 186 So.3d 1013 (Fla. 2016) (Floyd II).
Applying Floyd II, we find that the jury instructions given in the instant case did not amount to fundamental error. Although we did not previously address it, we also reject the appellant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The appellant's judgment and sentence is AFFIRMED.
ROBERTS, C.J., WOLF and LEWIS, JJ., CONCUR.