Case Name: Wayne Ernest BARKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dr. Joseph TAYLOR; Ann Sweeten, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-04-09
Citations: 226 F. App'x 390
Docket Number: No. 06-41034
Parties: Wayne Ernest BARKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dr. Joseph TAYLOR; Ann Sweeten, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 226
Pages: 390–391

Head Matter:
Wayne Ernest BARKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dr. Joseph TAYLOR; Ann Sweeten, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 06-41034
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 9, 2007.
Wayne Ernest Barker, Rusk, TX, pro se.
Before JONES, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Wayne Ernest Barker, Texas prisoner # 900987, appeals the district court's dismissal of his pro se and in forma pauperis civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Barker argues that the Texas Department of Criminal Justice grievance procedures were unavailable at the time of his injury. Alternatively, Barker asserts that he should be exempt from the § 1997e exhaustion requirement due to his physical and mental problems.
The Supreme Court recently held "that failure to exhaust is an affirmative defense under the PLRA, and that inmates are not required to specially plead or demonstrate exhaustion in their complaints." Jones v. Bock, — U.S.—,—, 127 S.Ct. 910, 921, 166 L.Ed.2d 798 (2007). Under Jones, the district court erred by dismissing the case because Barker did not demonstrate in his pleadings that he had exhausted his claims.
Accordingly, the district court's judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded for further proceedings.
VACATED AND REMANDED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.