Case Name: F. W. Crary, Respondent, v. Edward M. Greenleaf, Appellant
Court: Washington Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Washington
Decision Date: 1925-02-19
Citations: 133 Wash. 694
Docket Number: No. 18490
Parties: F. W. Crary, Respondent, v. Edward M. Greenleaf, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Washington Reports
Volume: 133
Pages: 694–695

Head Matter:
[No. 18490.
En Banc.
February 19, 1925.]
F. W. Crary, Respondent, v. Edward M. Greenleaf, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Gilliam, J., entered October 4, 1923, upon findings in favor o£ the plaintiff, in an action on contract, tried to the court.
Dismissed.
Hastings & Stedman (Donald G. Graham, of counsel), for appellant.
Allen & Griffith, Tucker & Hyland, and F. W. Crary, for respondent.
Reported in 233 Pac. 1117.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
F. W. Crary recovered a money judgment in the superior court against Edward M. Greenleaf and New Amsterdam Casualty Company. Thereafter Edward M. Greenleaf gave notice of appeal and attempted to make it effectual by giving what pur ports to be an appeal and supersedeas bond with only the New Amsterdam Casualty Company surety thereon, it being one of the judgment debtors. Respondent, F. W. Crary, has moved to dismiss the appeal for the reason that no appeal bond with surety or sureties as required by law has been furnished or filed.
The case is in all respects similar in principle to the case of Den Bleyker v. King County, 108 Wash. 687, 185 Pac. 613, and for the reasons therein expressed, which are applicable here, the motion to dismiss the appeal must be and it is hereby granted.