Case Name: William JOLLEY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2007-06-12
Citations: 226 S.W.3d 257
Docket Number: No. ED 86812
Parties: William JOLLEY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 226
Pages: 257–257

Head Matter:
William JOLLEY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 86812.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
June 12, 2007.
Jo Ann Rotermund, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Evan J. Buchheim, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, William Jolley, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because he proved that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to call his mother to testify at his criminal trial.
The motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).