Case Name: Waldo FENNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bill BELL, Mayor; Patrick Baker; Steven W. Chalmers; Ronald Hodge; Lee Russ; Stephen Mihaich; Bev Council; Jeff Lamb; R.H. Shepherd; B.D. Reitz; Timothy Stanhope; M.K. Bond; Lawrence Campbell; Mrs. Shannon Tucker; Mrs. Daniel Bruno; Michael S. Ferguson; Orlando Hudson, Judge; Payne, Magistrate; T.A. Drew, Magistrate; Anthony Moss; Dr. Oxley, Chief Executive Officer; Renee Gorby; Elaine Bushfan, Chief Justice; Tracey E. Cline; Michael Nifong, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-04-26
Citations: 375 F. App'x 362
Docket Number: No. 09-2348
Parties: Waldo FENNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bill BELL, Mayor; Patrick Baker; Steven W. Chalmers; Ronald Hodge; Lee Russ; Stephen Mihaich; Bev Council; Jeff Lamb; R.H. Shepherd; B.D. Reitz; Timothy Stanhope; M.K. Bond; Lawrence Campbell; Mrs. Shannon Tucker; Mrs. Daniel Bruno; Michael S. Ferguson; Orlando Hudson, Judge; Payne, Magistrate; T.A. Drew, Magistrate; Anthony Moss; Dr. Oxley, Chief Executive Officer; Renee Gorby; Elaine Bushfan, Chief Justice; Tracey E. Cline; Michael Nifong, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 375
Pages: 362–362

Head Matter:
Waldo FENNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bill BELL, Mayor; Patrick Baker; Steven W. Chalmers; Ronald Hodge; Lee Russ; Stephen Mihaich; Bev Council; Jeff Lamb; R.H. Shepherd; B.D. Reitz; Timothy Stanhope; M.K. Bond; Lawrence Campbell; Mrs. Shannon Tucker; Mrs. Daniel Bruno; Michael S. Ferguson; Orlando Hudson, Judge; Payne, Magistrate; T.A. Drew, Magistrate; Anthony Moss; Dr. Oxley, Chief Executive Officer; Renee Gorby; Elaine Bushfan, Chief Justice; Tracey E. Cline; Michael Nifong, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 09-2348.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 22, 2010.
Decided: April 26, 2010.
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Waldo Fenner appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, as modified, and dismissing his civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fenner v. Bell, No. l:08-cv-00367-TDS-DPD, 2009 WL 6372547 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 13, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIMED.