Case Name: Monlogni Clement MITOKPE, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-08-02
Citations: 235 F. App'x 117
Docket Number: No. 06-2236
Parties: Monlogni Clement MITOKPE, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 235
Pages: 117–118

Head Matter:
Monlogni Clement MITOKPE, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 06-2236.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 18, 2007.
Decided: Aug. 2, 2007.
Irena I. Karpinski, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Carol Federighi, Senior Litigation Counsel, Stacey I. Young, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Monlogni Clement Mitokpe, a native and citizen of Togo, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reopen. We have reviewed the record and the Board's order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen on the ground that it was untimely filed. See 8 U.S.C.A. § 1229a(e)(7)(C) (West 2005 & Supp.2007) (establishing a ninety-day time limitation for filing a motion to reopen); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2) (2007) (same); INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24, 112 S.Ct. 719, 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992) (setting forth standard of review).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.