Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael J. SMITH, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-08-30
Citations: 196 F. App'x 229
Docket Number: No. 06-6603
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Michael J. SMITH, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 196
Pages: 229–230

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Michael J. SMITH, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 06-6603.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 24, 2006.
Decided: Aug. 30, 2006.
Michael J. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Rae McKeel, Office of the United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Michael J. Smith appeals the district court's order denying his motion to compel a Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Smith, No. 4:01-cr-00067-JBF-AL (E.D.Va. Mar. 7, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED