Case Name: NICHOLAS TARZIA v. GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA COMPANY ET AL.
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1999-05-03
Citations: 248 Conn. 920
Docket Number: 
Parties: NICHOLAS TARZIA v. GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA COMPANY ET AL.
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 248
Pages: 920–920

Head Matter:
NICHOLAS TARZIA v. GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA COMPANY ET AL.
The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16099.
Michael T. Bologna, in support of the petition.
Decided May 3, 1999

Opinion:
The third party defendant Samuel Heyman's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 52 Conn. App. 136 (AC 16676), is granted, limited to the following issues:
"1. Did the Appellate Court properly enforce the twenty day time limit of General Statutes § 52-102a for asserting a claim against an impleaded party?
"2. Did the Appellate Court properly hold that the trial court abused its discretion by refusing to allow an untimely 'assertion of claim' to be 'amended' into a negligence complaint after the jury had been selected?"
CALLAHAN, C. J., and MCDONALD, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.