Case Name: Michael Dietz, Respondent, v. Alfred Weisthal, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1928-03-15
Citations: 131 Misc. 597
Docket Number: 
Parties: Michael Dietz, Respondent, v. Alfred Weisthal, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 131
Pages: 597–598

Head Matter:
Michael Dietz, Respondent, v. Alfred Weisthal, Appellant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
March 15, 1928.
Becht & Glaser, for the appellant.
Benjamin B. Weinberg, for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Defendant's counsel having been actually engaged in the trial of a case in the Supreme Court and having presented an affidavit to the court, defendant was entitled to an adjournment.
The order opening the default is modified by striking out the terms imposed, and as so modified is affirmed, with ten dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.
All concur; present, Lydon, Levy and Crain, JJ.