Case Name: William Gray, Plaintiff in Error, versus Woodbury Storer
Court: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Jurisdiction: Massachusetts
Decision Date: 1813-05
Citations: 9 Tyng 163
Docket Number: 
Parties: William Gray, Plaintiff in Error, versus Woodbury Storer.
Judges: 
Reporter: Massachusetts Reports
Volume: 10
Pages: 172–173

Head Matter:
William Gray, Plaintiff in Error, versus Woodbury Storer.
Error does not lie on a judgment rendered on an agreed statement of facts, submitted by the parties for the opinion and decision of the Court
This was a writ of error, brought to reverse a judgment of this court, rendered February term,’ 1802, between these parties, a report of which was given in the supplement to the second volume of these reports, (p. 565.)
Whitman and Storer for the defendant in error,
[Vide ante, p. 143, Bacon vs. Ward, in note to that case. — Ed.]

Opinion:
Upon inspecting the record, and finding the judgment to have been rendered on a statement of facts agreed by the [*164] * parties, the Court ordered the plaintiff m error to become nonsuit, and he was called accordingly. Davis (Solicitor-General) for the plaintiff in error.
ADDITIONAL NOTE.
[Error does not lie, where the facts proved before the jury are, by consent of par ties, reported by the judge for the opinion of the Court. — Johnson vs. Shed, 21 Pick. 225.
Nor, where a cause is by agreement referred to an auditor, voluntarily chosen by the parties, to report the amount due the plaintiff's, does error lie upon a judgment founded on such report. — Allen vs. Myers, 5 Rawle, 335
But see Smith vs. Moore, 6 Greenl. 274.
See Ward vs. Crenshaw, 4 Yerg. 197__F. H.]
7 Mass. Rep. 380, Alfred vs Saco.