Case Name: George Reiner and Co., Inc., Appellant, v. Arnold Schwartz, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1975-11-20
Citations: 50 A.D.2d 688
Docket Number: 
Parties: George Reiner and Co., Inc., Appellant, v Arnold Schwartz, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 50
Pages: 688–688

Head Matter:
George Reiner and Co., Inc., Appellant, v Arnold Schwartz, Respondent.

Opinion:
— Motion for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted, without costs. The facts found by Special Term have been considered and affirmed. Pursuant tó CPLR 5713, this court certifies that the following question of law, decisive of the correctness of its determination, has arisen, which in its opinion ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals: "Did Special Term err as a matter of law in granting defendant's motion to dismiss the cause of action set forth in the complaint on the ground that the court lacked jurisdiction of the person of the defendant?" Herlihy, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Main and Reynolds, JJ., concur.