Case Name: William Scott DAVIS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Attorney Richard DURHAM, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-08-01
Citations: 667 F. App'x 421
Docket Number: No. 16-1525
Parties: William Scott DAVIS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Attorney Richard DURHAM, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 667
Pages: 421–422

Head Matter:
William Scott DAVIS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Attorney Richard DURHAM, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 16-1525
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 28, 2016
Decided: August 1, 2016
William Scott Davis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
William Scott Davis, Jr;, appeals the district court's order denying six motions in his closed 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. Durham, No. 5:11-cv-00036-H (E.D.N.C. Apr. 5, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED