Case Name: Joseph B. GRIGGS, Petitioner, v. CAPITOL MACHINE WORKS, INC., an Active Texas Corporation, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Texas
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1985-11-06
Citations: 701 S.W.2d 238
Docket Number: No. C-4291
Parties: Joseph B. GRIGGS, Petitioner, v. CAPITOL MACHINE WORKS, INC., an Active Texas Corporation, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 701
Pages: 238–238

Head Matter:
Joseph B. GRIGGS, Petitioner, v. CAPITOL MACHINE WORKS, INC., an Active Texas Corporation, Respondent.
No. C-4291.
Supreme Court of Texas.
Nov. 6, 1985.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 15, 1986.
Stephen Nagle & Associates, Stephen Nagle, Austin, for petitioner.
Brown, Maroney, Rose Barber & Dye, Ronald D. Wamsted, Austin, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this summary judgment, Joseph Griggs, the non-movant, failed to comply with our holding in City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin Authority, 589 S.W.2d 671 (Tex.1979). No response was made to the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Capitol Machine Works, Inc. Consequently, Griggs may not be heard to argue in this court a point he did not present first to the trial court. Clear Creek, 589 S.W.2d at 678.
The trial court granted summary judgment for Capitol Machine Works, Inc., and the court of appeals affirmed the trial court's judgment. 690 S.W.2d 287. For the reasons stated, we refuse the application for writ of error, no reversible error. This disposition should not be construed as a ruling on any point of error brought to this court by Petitioner Griggs.