Case Name: Grace Da Rin, Respondent, v. Rose Cardone, as Executrix of Maria Cardone, Deceased, et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1960-11-23
Citations: 28 Misc. 2d 511
Docket Number: 
Parties: Grace Da Rin, Respondent, v. Rose Cardone, as Executrix of Maria Cardone, Deceased, et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 28
Pages: 511–512

Head Matter:
Grace Da Rin, Respondent, v. Rose Cardone, as Executrix of Maria Cardone, Deceased, et al., Appellants.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
November 23, 1960.
Irving Segal and Sidney Advocate for appellants.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
No adequate excuse for failure to move to restore the case within the one-year period provided in subdivision (c) of rule XV of the Rules of the City Court of the City of New York was given. Therefore no discretion existed to grant the relief.
The. order should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied.
Concur — Hecht, J. P., Steuer and Tilzeb, JJ.
Order reversed, etc.