Case Name: Mary L. BATTLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.; Chase Home Finance, Inc., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-04-26
Citations: 375 F. App'x 328
Docket Number: No. 09-2387
Parties: Mary L. BATTLE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.; Chase Home Finance, Inc., Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 375
Pages: 328–329

Head Matter:
Mary L. BATTLE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.; Chase Home Finance, Inc., Defendants—Appellees.
No. 09-2387.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 22, 2010.
Decided: April 26, 2010.
Mary L. Battle, Appellant Pro Se. Frank Kenneth Friedman, Woods Rogers, PLC, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Mary L. Battle appeals the district court's*order dismissing her civil complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Battle v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 2:09-cv-00462-RAJ-FBS (E.D.Va. Nov. 20, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.