Case Name: Thomas A. NORDBROK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, Powhatan R & CC; Dillman, Warden; EPPS, Capt.; Srgnt Bynum, Srgnt.; The officer on duty, C/O, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-10-26
Citations: 621 F. App'x 227
Docket Number: No. 15-6721
Parties: Thomas A. NORDBROK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, Powhatan R & CC; Dillman, Warden; EPPS, Capt.; Srgnt Bynum, Srgnt.; The officer on duty, C/O, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 621
Pages: 227–227

Head Matter:
Thomas A. NORDBROK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, Powhatan R & CC; Dillman, Warden; EPPS, Capt.; Srgnt Bynum, Srgnt.; The officer on duty, C/O, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15-6721.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 20, 2015.
Decided: Oct. 26, 2015.
Thomas A. Nordbrok, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Thomas A. Nordbrok appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice for failure to comply with a court order. Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure permits a district court to dismiss an action based on a plaintiffs failure to comply with any order. Where a litigant has ignored a district court's express warning that noncompliance will result in dismissal, it is appropriate for the court to dismiss the case. See Ballard v. Carlson, 882 F.2d 98, 95-96 (4th Cir.1989). Based on our review of the record in this case, we find no reversible error. We therefore affirm the district court's order. Nordbrok v. Dep't of Corr., No. 2:14-cv-00533-AWA-DEM (E.D.Va. Apr. 20, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. •
AFFIRMED.