Case Name: NEW YORK HARBOR DRY DOCK CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1927-04-04
Citations: 18 F.2d 778
Docket Number: No. 192
Parties: NEW YORK HARBOR DRY DOCK CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES.
Judges: Before HOUGH, MANTON, and SWAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 18
Pages: 778–779

Head Matter:
NEW YORK HARBOR DRY DOCK CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
April 4, 1927.
No. 192.
Duncan & Mount, of New York City (Cecil Page and Bussell T. Mount, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Emory B. Buckner, U. S. Atty., of New York City (Walter Sehaffner, Sp. Asst.. U. S. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), for the United States.
Before HOUGH, MANTON, and SWAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PEB CURIAM.
Libelant repaired and reconditioned a steamship belonging to the United States, but at the time under charter to United States Mail Steamship Company, Inc., a corporation now insolvent if not defunct. The charterer was an intending purchaser, and had agreed with the United States as owner to pay for the expected reconditioning. Knowing or having the opportunity of knowing these facts, libelant contracted in writing with charterer for the said repairs and reconditioning, and, not having been paid in full, brought this suit under the Suits in Admiralty Act (Comp. St. § 1251%-1251:J4Z) to enforce payment by the owner.
We perceive no material difference between the facts at bar and those in Morse, etc., Co. v. United States (C. C. A.) 1 F.(2d) 233; and under United States v. Carver, 260 U. S. 482, 43 S. Ct. 181, 67 L. Ed. 361, there can be no lien.
There is a strong moral obligation upon the government to pay this admittedly just claim, but there is no legal liability.
Decree affirmed, without costs.