Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Luis Rodriguez RODRIGUEZ, also known as Jose Luis Rodriguez-Rodriguez, also known as Jose Luis Rodriguez, also known as Jose L. Rodriguez, also known as Jose Rodriguez-Rodriguez, also known as Joe Rodriguez, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-02-15
Citations: 411 F. App'x 752
Docket Number: No. 10-20008
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Luis Rodriguez RODRIGUEZ, also known as Jose Luis Rodriguez-Rodriguez, also known as Jose Luis Rodriguez, also known as Jose L. Rodriguez, also known as Jose Rodriguez-Rodriguez, also known as Joe Rodriguez, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before HIGGINBOTHAM, GARZA, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 411
Pages: 752–753

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Luis Rodriguez RODRIGUEZ, also known as Jose Luis Rodriguez-Rodriguez, also known as Jose Luis Rodriguez, also known as Jose L. Rodriguez, also known as Jose Rodriguez-Rodriguez, also known as Joe Rodriguez, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-20008
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Feb. 15, 2011.
James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Laura Fletcher Leavitt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendanb-Appellant.
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, GARZA, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Luis Rodriguez Rodriguez (Rodriguez) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Rodriguez has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel's brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.