Case Name: Jacqueline M. KINSLER, Appellant, v. DEPAUL HEALTH CENTER, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-09-04
Citations: 54 S.W.3d 709
Docket Number: No. ED 78821
Parties: Jacqueline M. KINSLER, Appellant, v. DEPAUL HEALTH CENTER, Respondent.
Judges: Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 54
Pages: 709–710

Head Matter:
Jacqueline M. KINSLER, Appellant, v. DEPAUL HEALTH CENTER, Respondent.
No. ED 78821.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Sept. 4, 2001.
Stephen G. Bell, Ronald J. Wuebbeling, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Kevin M. Leahy, Moser and Marsalek, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Jacqueline M. Kinsler, appeals the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission in favor of respondent, DePaul Health Center, denying her compensation. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and find the judgment is supported by substantial and competent evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence based on the record as a whole. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).