Case Name: Herman Apfelbaum, Inc., Appellant, v. Abraham Keizer & Bro., Inc., Defendant, and Abraham Keizer and Another, Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1929-02-28
Citations: 133 Misc. 722
Docket Number: 
Parties: Herman Apfelbaum, Inc., Appellant, v. Abraham Keizer & Bro., Inc., Defendant, and Abraham Keizer and Another, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 133
Pages: 722–722

Head Matter:
Herman Apfelbaum, Inc., Appellant, v. Abraham Keizer & Bro., Inc., Defendant, and Abraham Keizer and Another, Respondents.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
February 28, 1929.
Maurice Rose, for the appellant.
Samuel Hettinger, for the respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Apart from the provisions of section 374-a of the Civil Practice Act, which did not go into effect until September first following the trial, the evidence sufficed to permit the introduction in evidence as against the individual defendants of the entries in the books of account of the defendant corporation affecting the assigned accounts. (Leonard v. Faber, 52 App. Div. 495, 499; Hotopp v. Huber, 160 N. Y. 524, 529, 530.)
Judgment and orders reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.
All concur; present, Lydon, Callahan and Peters, JJ.