Case Name: Dorothy M. LAINESSE, Petitioner, v. ST. CLAIRS CAFETERIA and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1966-03-23
Citations: 184 So. 2d 423
Docket Number: No. 34935
Parties: Dorothy M. LAINESSE, Petitioner, v. ST. CLAIRS CAFETERIA and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
Judges: THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 184
Pages: 423–424

Head Matter:
Dorothy M. LAINESSE, Petitioner, v. ST. CLAIRS CAFETERIA and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
No. 34935.
Supreme Court of Florida.
March 23, 1966.
Richard L. Seidel, Miami, for petitioner.
Lewis F. Cohen, Miami, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date October 27, 1965.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition for writ of certiorari and the petition for attorney's fees are both denied.
It is so ordered.
THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and ERVIN, JJ., concur.