Case Name: CONNECTICUT FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KIMBELL MILLING COMPANY et al., Defendants-Appellants
Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1964-05-28
Citations: 164 So. 2d 642
Docket Number: No. 1140
Parties: CONNECTICUT FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KIMBELL MILLING COMPANY et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: Before TATE, SAVOY, and CULPEP-PER, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 164
Pages: 642–642

Head Matter:
CONNECTICUT FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KIMBELL MILLING COMPANY et al., Defendants-Appellants.
No. 1140.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Third Circuit.
May 28, 1964.
Rehearing Denied June 17, 1964.
Blanchard, Goldstein, Walker & O’Quin, by Wilton H. Williams, Jr., Shreveport, for defendants-appellants.
Thomas & Friedman, by Gerard F. Thomas, Jr., Gahagan & Gahagan, by Marvin F. Gahagan, Natchitoches, for plaintiff-appellee.
Before TATE, SAVOY, and CULPEP-PER, JJ.

Opinion:
TATE, Judge.
This suit was consolidated for trial and appeal with the companion case of Simpson v. Kimbell Milling Co., 164 So.2d 637 (Docket No. 1138), rendered by us this same date. The present suit is a subrogation claim by the collision insurer of the vehicle driven by Simpson, plaintiff in the companion suit. The present plaintiff insurer's right to recovery, and all issues of the trial and of the appeal, are identical with the issues in the companion Simpson suit. •
For the reasons stated in the companion appeal, the trial court's judgment herein is amended so as to strike out the findings that the defendants were guilty of negligence and that the plaintiff's assured was guilty of contributory negligence; as thus amended, the judgment is affirmed in all other respects. The plaintiff-appellee to pay all costs of this appeal.
Amended and affirmed.