Case Name: Eugene L. Mausbach, appellant, v. Deena L. Mausbach, appellee
Court: Nebraska Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Nebraska
Decision Date: 1989-02-24
Citations: 231 Neb. 280
Docket Number: No. 87-150
Parties: Eugene L. Mausbach, appellant, v. Deena L. Mausbach, appellee.
Judges: Hastings, C. J., Grant, and Fahrnbruch, JJ., and Hendrix and Olberding, D. J J.
Reporter: Nebraska Reports
Volume: 231
Pages: 280–280

Head Matter:
Eugene L. Mausbach, appellant, v. Deena L. Mausbach, appellee.
435 N.W.2d 914
Filed February 24, 1989.
No. 87-150.
Jerome J. Ortman for appellant.
David L. Herzog, P.C., for appellee.
Hastings, C. J., Grant, and Fahrnbruch, JJ., and Hendrix and Olberding, D. J J.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The petitioner, Eugene L. Mausbach, appeals the division of property, alimony order, and allowance of an attorney fee in this dissolution proceeding.
As required in cases of this nature, we have reviewed the record de novo to determine whether the district court abused its discretion in dividing the property, granting an amount of alimony, and allowing an attorney fee. See Decker v. Decker, 229 Neb. 347, 426 N.W.2d 533 (1988).
We determine that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in either the division of assets or its award of alimony and attorney fee. Accordingly, the decree of the trial court is affirmed. The request for attorney fees in this court is denied.
Affirmed.