Case Name: J. B. LaCroix & Frere v. Perley R. Eaton
Court: Vermont Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Vermont
Decision Date: 1925-12-05
Citations: 99 Vt. 262
Docket Number: 
Parties: J. B. LaCroix & Frere v. Perley R. Eaton.
Judges: Present: Watson, C. J., Powers, Taylor, Slack, and Butler, JJ.
Reporter: Vermont Reports
Volume: 99
Pages: 262–265

Head Matter:
J. B. LaCroix & Frere v. Perley R. Eaton.
(Two cases, same title, heard together)
November Term, 1924.
Present: Watson, C. J., Powers, Taylor, Slack, and Butler, JJ.
Opinion filed December 5, 1925.
Lawrence, Stafford & Bloomer for the plaintiffs.
Marvelle G. Webber for the defendant.
Opinion in these cases (Supreme Court Nos. 1015a, 1016a) was withdrawn pending decision on motion for reargument therein, and refiled with such decision June 19, 1926.

Opinion:
Butler, J.
The action in each ease is tort, founded on G-. L. 6888, in each of which the plaintiffs seek to recover the amount of a postdated check. They are before us on plaintiffs' exception to the sustaining of defendant's demurrer to the complaints. The cases were argued and submitted with the case of F. E. Lovell v. Perley R. Eaton, reported in 99 Vt. 255, 133 Atl. 742, where the same questions were raised as here involved. The conclusion there reached is controlling. This requires an affirmance of each of the judgments below.
Judgments affirmed and causes remanded.