Case Name: Benjamin Smusch, Respondent, v. Joseph Ravitch et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1900-12
Citations: 33 Misc. 766
Docket Number: 
Parties: Benjamin Smusch, Respondent, v. Joseph Ravitch et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 33
Pages: 766–766

Head Matter:
Benjamin Smusch, Respondent, v. Joseph Ravitch et al., Appellants.
Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, fourth district, borough of Manhattan.
Nicholas Aleinikoff, for appellants.
Jacob Rieger, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The testimony in this case is insufficient to establish a conversion. The defendants did not exercise acts of dominion over the chattels in question to the exclusion of plaintiffs rights as owner, and judgment should have been awarded to the defendants.
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide the event.
Present: Beekmaw, P. J., Giegerich and O'Gormaw, JJ.
Judgment reversed and new- trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide event.