Case Name: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. AERO ENGINEERING CORPORATION, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1970-12-02
Citations: 433 F.2d 1311
Docket Number: No. 29614
Parties: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. AERO ENGINEERING CORPORATION, Respondent.
Judges: Before JONES, GEWIN and CLARK, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 433
Pages: 1311–1311

Head Matter:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. AERO ENGINEERING CORPORATION, Respondent.
No. 29614.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 2, 1970.
Rehearing Denied and Rehearing En Banc Denied Feb. 16, 1971.
Clifford W. Potter, Regional Director, N.L.R.B., Houston, Tex., Warren M. Davison, Washington, D. C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, John I. Taylor, Jr., Atty., N. L. R. B., for petitioner.
James V. Carroll, III, Andrews, Kurth, Campbell & Jones, Houston, Tex., for respondent.
Before JONES, GEWIN and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The National Labor Relations Board made findings that the respondent, Aero Engineering Corporation, was in violation of section 8(a) (5) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act for refusing to bargain with a union which it found to represent a group of the respondent's employees. The Board entered an order directing the respondent to cease and desist from violations of the Act, to bargain when requested, and to post appropriate notices. The Board seeks enforcement of its order. There is substantial evidence on the record as a whole to sustain the Board's findings and the law requires that its order be enforced. A discussion of the facts and of the pertinent law would not serve as an aid to the decision of future controversies. The order of the Board will be enforced.