Case Name: Roland DAVIS, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-07-22
Citations: 110 S.W.3d 872
Docket Number: No. ED 82170
Parties: Roland DAVIS, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, Jr., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 110
Pages: 872–872

Head Matter:
Roland DAVIS, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Defendant/Respondent.
No. ED 82170.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District. Division Three.
July 22, 2003.
Roland Davis, Licking, pro se.
Patricia A. Hageman, Edward J. Han-lon, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, Jr., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Roland Davis appeals from the judgment dismissing his negligence action. He asserts that the statute of limitations should not apply. No error of law appears and an opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have, however, been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).