Case Name: Arthur BICKART, Appellant, v. UNION BARGE LINE CORPORATION, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1954-02-01
Citations: 209 F.2d 957
Docket Number: No. 11164
Parties: Arthur BICKART, Appellant, v. UNION BARGE LINE CORPORATION, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 209
Pages: 957–958

Head Matter:
Arthur BICKART, Appellant, v. UNION BARGE LINE CORPORATION, Appellee.
No. 11164.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued Jan. 21, 1954.
Decided Feb. 1, 1954.
. Hymen Schlesinger, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellant.
■John R. Bredin; Dalzell, Pringle, Bredin & Martin, Pittsburgh, Pa., for .appellee.
Before McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER and STALEY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The district judge found that the date of appellant's maximum recovery from the injury involved was September 8, 1946; that the amount due him in this action for maintenance and cure was $575,' and that there was ho proof that the massage- and heat applications, self administered, under which further maintenance is claimed' were curative treatments. There is substantial evidence to justify those findings.
The judgment of the district court, 110 F.Supp. 942, will be affirmed.