Case Name: John Hemingway et al., Appellants, v. Diedrich C. Oldenberg, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1900-06
Citations: 31 Misc. 782
Docket Number: 
Parties: John Hemingway et al., Appellants, v. Diedrich C. Oldenberg, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 31
Pages: 782–783

Head Matter:
John Hemingway et al., Appellants, v. Diedrich C. Oldenberg, Respondent.
Appeal by the plaintiffs from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan, rendered-in favor of the defendant upon a trial had before the court without a jury.
Oscar J. Hochstadter, for appellants.
Edward Herrmann, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The record is barren of an exception, and the questions presented by this appeal relate solely to the facts. The main question contested at the trial was whether the safe in suit was included in the sale of the plaintiffs' business to the defendant. The testimony with respect to this point is conflicting, but the trial justice having found in favor of the defendant, we see no reason for disturbing his conclusion.
Present: Beekman, P. J., Giegerich and O'Gorman, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.