Case Name: Thomas Mulligan, Respondent, v. Harry A. Rausch, Jr., et al., Appellants, and Agostino Cervone, M.D., et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2011-11-09
Citations: 89 A.D.3d 811
Docket Number: 
Parties: Thomas Mulligan, Respondent, v Harry A. Rausch, Jr., et al., Appellants, and Agostino Cervone, M.D., et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 89
Pages: 811–812

Head Matter:
Thomas Mulligan, Respondent, v Harry A. Rausch, Jr., et al., Appellants, and Agostino Cervone, M.D., et al., Respondents.
[932 NYS2d 360]

Opinion:
The Supreme Court properly determined there were triable issues of fact requiring the denial of the appellants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them. Rivera, J.E, Eng, Belen and Austin, JJ., concur.