Case Name: Tinya CHERNEY v. NORTH CAROLINA ZOOLOGICAL PARK.
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 2008-03-07
Citations: 657 S.E.2d 352
Docket Number: No. 606A04-3.
Parties: Tinya CHERNEY
v.
NORTH CAROLINA ZOOLOGICAL PARK.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Eastern Reporter 2d
Volume: 657
Pages: 352–352

Head Matter:
Tinya CHERNEY
v.
NORTH CAROLINA ZOOLOGICAL PARK.
No. 606A04-3.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
March 7, 2008.
Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 185 N.C.App. ___, 648 S.E.2d 242 (2007), affirming a decision and order entered by the North Carolina Industrial Commission on 28 April 2006. Heard in the Supreme Court 12 February 2008.
Knott & Berger, L.L.P., by Joe Thomas Knott, III, Bruce W. Berger, and Kenneth R. Murphy, III, Raleigh, for plaintiff-appellant.
Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by William H. Borden, Special Deputy Attorney General, for defendant-appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals affirming the Industrial Commission's decision and order is reversed. This case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the Industrial Commission for entry of a new decision and order in accordance with the premises liability standard articulated in Nelson v. Freeland, 349 N.C. 615, 507 S.E.2d 882 (1998) and applied subsequently in Martishius v. Carolco Studios, Inc., 355 N.C. 465, 562 S.E.2d 887 (2002). The Commission shall enter its new decision and order on the record as it exists without taking additional evidence.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Justices NEWBY and TIMMONS-GOODSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.