Case Name: DIZICK, Appellant, v. UMPQUA COMMUNITY COLLEGE, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1978-11-06
Citations: 37 Or. App. 55
Docket Number: No. 75-273, CA 7429
Parties: DIZICK, Appellant, v. UMPQUA COMMUNITY COLLEGE, Respondent.
Judges: Before Schwab, Chief Judge, Johnson and Roberts, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 37
Pages: 55–57

Head Matter:
On remand from Oregon Supreme Court September 29, 1978,
argued September 27, 1977,
affirmed November 6,
reconsideration denied December 5, 1978,
petition for review allowed January 16, 1979
DIZICK, Appellant, v. UMPQUA COMMUNITY COLLEGE, Respondent.
(No. 75-273, CA 7429)
585 P2d 1148
Robert M. Stults, Judge Pro Tempore.
Dean Heiling, Roseburg, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Heiling & McIntosh, Roseburg.
Eldon F. Caley, Roseburg, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Long, Neuner, Dole, Caley & Kolberg, Roseburg.
Before Schwab, Chief Judge, Johnson and Roberts, Judges.
JOHNSON, J.

Opinion:
JOHNSON, J.
This case was remanded to this court by the Supreme Court for reconsideration. In light of the decision in McBride v. Magnuson, 282 Or 433, 578 P2d 1259 (1978), we conclude that the majority and concurring opinions reported in Dizick v. Umpqua Community College, 33 Or App 559, 577 P2d 534 (1978), are not inconsistent with McBride. We adhere to our original decision.
Affirmed.