Case Name: Helen Keller Services for the Blind, Plaintiff, v. 510 Gates Avenue, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, et al., Defendants. Gates Avenue Housing Development Fund Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1994-07-18
Citations: 206 A.D.2d 459
Docket Number: 
Parties: Helen Keller Services for the Blind, Plaintiff, v 510 Gates Avenue, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, et al., Defendants. Gates Avenue Housing Development Fund Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 206
Pages: 459–459

Head Matter:
Helen Keller Services for the Blind, Plaintiff, v 510 Gates Avenue, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, et al., Defendants. Gates Avenue Housing Development Fund Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.
[614 NYS2d 934]

Opinion:
In an action to foreclose on a purchase money mortgage, the third-party defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.), dated December 22, 1992, which denied the third-party defendant's motion to vacate its default in answering the third-party complaint.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
A party seeking to vacate a default must demonstrate a reasonable excuse for the delay and the existence of a meritorious defense (see, Gray v B.R. Trucking Co., 59 NY2d 966; Almodovar v All State Gen. Bldg. & Remodeling Contrs., 166 AD2d 396). The failure by the third-party defendant to demonstrate a legally cognizable reason for its failure to timely submit an answer (see, e.g., Ungar v Holmes Protection, 87 AD2d 589) constituted sufficient cause for the Supreme Court's refusal to vacate its default. Rosenblatt, J. P., Lawrence, Copertino and Joy, JJ., concur.