Case Name: CITY OF LAS VEGAS, NEVADA, a Municipal Corporation, Appellant, v. CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS, NEVADA, a Municipal Corporation, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada
Jurisdiction: Nevada
Decision Date: 1978-11-10
Citations: 94 Nev. 705
Docket Number: No. 9462
Parties: CITY OF LAS VEGAS, NEVADA, a Municipal Corporation, Appellant, v. CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS, NEVADA, a Municipal Corporation, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Nevada Reports
Volume: 94
Pages: 705–706

Head Matter:
CITY OF LAS VEGAS, NEVADA, a Municipal Corporation, Appellant, v. CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS, NEVADA, a Municipal Corporation, Respondent.
No. 9462
November 10, 1978
585 P.2d 1349
Albright & McGimsey, Las Vegas, for Appellant.
John P. Fadgen, City Attorney, North Las Vegas, for Respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION
Per Curiam:
In County of Clark v. City of North Las Vegas, 89 Nev. 10, 504 P.2d 1326 (1973), this court declared void an attempt by North Las Vegas to annex certain property. In Sunrise Manor v. City of North Las Vegas, 91 Nev. 713, 541 P.2d 1102(1975), this court determined that because de facto annexation had occurred, North Las Vegas could nevertheless retain tax revenues derived before we declared the annexation void.
In our view, the latter holding controls this case. Although appellant City of Las Vegas here argues that it was not technically a party, when we made our determination of de facto annexation, and therefore was not bound by it, we do not believe the facts appellant now offers to prove would or should alter our prior ruling in any event.
Accordingly, the district court's order granting summary judgment is affirmed.