Case Name: Albert COOPER and Tivan Johnson, Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1994-06-21
Citations: 638 So. 2d 200
Docket Number: Nos. 93-933, 93-932
Parties: Albert COOPER and Tivan Johnson, Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and LEVY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 638
Pages: 200–201

Head Matter:
Albert COOPER and Tivan Johnson, Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Nos. 93-933, 93-932.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
June 21, 1994.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Robert Finlay and Neil Rose, Sp. Asst. Public Defenders, for appellants.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Linda S. Katz, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and LEVY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
No reversible error has been demonstrated in the trial proceedings which culminated in the convictions entered below. Specifically, we find no deficiency in the standard Miranda rights form utilized by the Metro-Dade Police Department, see California v. Prysock, 453 U.S. 355, 101 S.Ct. 2806, 69 L.Ed.2d 696 (1981), and that, in the light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt, any arguable error in the admission of evidence or the argument of the prosecutor was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986). We do agree that the formal judgments entered against the defendants should be corrected to reflect that the charges contained in count V were dismissed on motion of the state.
Affirmed as modified.