Case Name: Daniel Neal McINTOSH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1988-12-14
Citations: 537 So. 2d 115
Docket Number: No. 88-46
Parties: Daniel Neal McINTOSH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: DANAHY, A.C.J., and PARKER, J., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 537
Pages: 115–115

Head Matter:
Daniel Neal McINTOSH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 88-46.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Dec. 14, 1988.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 27, 1989.
David T. Weisbrod, Tampa, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Candance M. Sunderland, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
HALL, Judge.
We have examined the record and determine that the trial judge intended to depart from the guidelines sentence on the basis of the appellant's repeated violations of probation and community control and that this is a valid reason justifying the departure. See Burton v. State, 513 So.2d 245 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).
DANAHY, A.C.J., and PARKER, J., concur.