Case Name: In re the Marriage of Virginia H. DOHERTY, Petitioner/Respondent, v. John G. DiMARIANO, Respondent/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-06-20
Citations: 19 S.W.3d 740
Docket Number: No. ED 76484
Parties: In re the Marriage of Virginia H. DOHERTY, Petitioner/Respondent, v. John G. DiMARIANO, Respondent/Appellant.
Judges: Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 19
Pages: 740–740

Head Matter:
In re the Marriage of Virginia H. DOHERTY, Petitioner/Respondent, v. John G. DiMARIANO, Respondent/Appellant.
No. ED 76484.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
June 20, 2000.
Spencer E. Williams, St. Louis, for appellant.
Mary Ann Weems, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
John G. DiMariano ("Appellant') appeals from a judgment of the St. Louis County Circuit Court modifying custody provisions and child support. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and affirm the trial court's judgment. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(1).