Case Name: Claud Smith, Plaintiff in Error, v. R. D. Reams, Defendant in Error
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1940-03-01
Citations: 145 Fla. 535
Docket Number: 
Parties: Claud Smith, Plaintiff in Error, v. R. D. Reams, Defendant in Error.
Judges: Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 145
Pages: 535–535

Head Matter:
Claud Smith, Plaintiff in Error, v. R. D. Reams, Defendant in Error.
194 So. 618
Division B
Opinion Filed March 1, 1940
Errol S. Wittes, for Plaintiff in Error;
C. P. Diamond and S'. N. Smith, for Defendant in Error.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur.
Buford, J., concurs in opinion and judgment.
Chief Justice Terrell not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.