Case Name: Edward RIEFLE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1993-09-14
Citations: 863 S.W.2d 383
Docket Number: No. 63371
Parties: Edward RIEFLE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 863
Pages: 383–384

Head Matter:
Edward RIEFLE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. 63371.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Sept. 14, 1993.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 19, 1993.
Application to Transfer Denied Nov. 23, 1993.
Dave Hemingway, St. Louis, for mov-ant/appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent/respondent.
Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.-035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been fur'nished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).