Case Name: HAYES v. McGILL
Court: Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jurisdiction: South Carolina
Decision Date: 1921-06-30
Citations: 116 S.C. 375
Docket Number: 10676
Parties: HAYES v. McGILL.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Carolina Reports
Volume: 116
Pages: 375–376

Head Matter:
10676
HAYES v. McGILL.
(108 S. E. 150)
Appeal and Eekok — Each Exception Must Contain Complete Assignment. — Under Rule 5 of the Supreme Court (104 S. C. 525) each exception must contain a complete assignment of error, and a mere reference therein to any other exception, then or previously taken, or requested charge! will not be considered.
Before McIvER, J., York. --.
Appeal dismissed.
Action by W. G. Hayes against J. Mason McGill. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant appeals.
Mr: J. S. Brice, for appellant,
cites: Express warranty : 35 Cyc. 372-4: Implied warranty: 105 S. C. 273. Express warranty excludes implied warranty: 35 Cyc. 392; 112 S. C. 422.
Mr. W. W. Letuis, for respondent,
cites: Express warrant excludes implied warranty: 112 S. C. 422.
June 30, 1921.

Opinion:
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Chief Justice Gary.
This statement appears in the record:
"This was an action brought by the respondent, W. G. Hayes, for the purpose of recovering the sum of $1,600 from the appellant, from whom respondent alleged he had purchased a certain truck, and that the appellant had guaranteed that the truck was sound and in good condition, and practically new; and that respondent, relying on the express warranty of the plaintiff, bought said truck, and afterwards discovered that it was worn out, and only good for old junk; and as there had been a complete failure of this warranty the respondent asked that he might be allowed to return the truck to'appellant and recovery the purchase price of $1,600."
The jury rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $1,600 and the defendant appealed on five exceptions. They, however, cannot be considered, as the appellant has failed to comply with the requirements of Rule 5 of this Court (90 S. E. vii), which is as follows:
"Each excéption must contain a concise statement of one proposition of law or fact, which this Court is asked to review. ' Bqch exception must contain within itself, a complete assignment of error, and a mere reference therein to any other exception then or previously taken, or request to charge, will not be considered."
Appeal dismissed.