Case Name: Fred KLOSENBERG, Petitioner, v. James RAINWATER, Judge of the County Court, Dade County Florida, and Cathy Lynn Klosenberg, Respondents
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1982-03-16
Citations: 410 So. 2d 1009
Docket Number: No. 81-2632
Parties: Fred KLOSENBERG, Petitioner, v. James RAINWATER, Judge of the County Court, Dade County Florida, and Cathy Lynn Klosenberg, Respondents.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 410
Pages: 1009–1009

Head Matter:
Fred KLOSENBERG, Petitioner, v. James RAINWATER, Judge of the County Court, Dade County Florida, and Cathy Lynn Klosenberg, Respondents.
No. 81-2632.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 16, 1982.
Ephraim Collins, Margate, for petitioner.
Robert A. Ginsburg, County Atty. and Roy Wood, Asst. County Atty., Broad & Cassel and H. Jack Klingensmith, Bay Harbor, for respondents.
Before SCHWARTZ, BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Because the administrative orders of the chief judge, which assigned the respondent county court judge to preside over specified circuit court proceedings designated as "A.F.D.C., U.R.E.S.A. and uncontested paternity" cases, manifestly did not include Dade County Circuit Court Case No. 77-42100 FC 02, the respondent lacks jurisdiction further to consider that cause, and is prohibited from doing so. 25 Fla.Jur. Prohibition § 18,40 (1959); see, Martinez v. Demers, 410 So.2d 5 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981). We are certain that it will not be necessary to issue a formal judgment in prohibition.
Prohibition granted.
. This action of course is without prejudice to any proceedings before the appropriate circuit court judge or a master designated by that court.