Case Name: In the Matter of A. W., Appellant
Court: District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Decision Date: 1976-01-30
Citations: 353 A.2d 686
Docket Number: No. 10397
Parties: In the Matter of A. W., Appellant.
Judges: Before FICKLING and NEBEKER, Associate Judges, and PAIR, Associate Judge, Retired.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 353
Pages: 686–696

Head Matter:
In the Matter of A. W., Appellant.
No. 10397.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Argued Jan. 30, 1976.
Decided Jan. 30, 1976.
Concurring Opinion Feb. 9, 1976.
W. Anthony Fitch, Washington, D. C., for appellant.
Ted P. Gerarden, Asst. Corp. Counsel, Washington, D. C., for appellee. Louis P. Robbins, Acting Corp. Counsel, Richard W. Barton, and Michael J. Dowd, Jr., Asst. Corp. Counsels, Washington, D. C., for ap-pellee.
Before FICKLING and NEBEKER, Associate Judges, and PAIR, Associate Judge, Retired.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
This interlocutory appeal came on for consideration on the record from the Superior Court, appellant's memorandum of law and motion for summary reversal of the order of the trial court on appeal herein and the court heard argument of counsel. Upon consideration thereof, it is
Ordered that appellant's motion be denied, and it is
Further ordered, there being no showing of an abuse of discretion by the trial judge, that the order on appeal herein be, and the same hereby is, affirmed.