Case Name: In the Matter of Colleen Kane-Dabu, Appellant, v. Ferdinand Dabu, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2002-09-30
Citations: 297 A.D.2d 815
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Colleen Kane-Dabu, Appellant, v Ferdinand Dabu, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 297
Pages: 815–816

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Colleen Kane-Dabu, Appellant, v Ferdinand Dabu, Respondent.
[747 NYS2d 809]

Opinion:
The Family Court, although, in effect, finding that it had jurisdiction, providently exercised its discretion in determining that New York is an inconvenient forum for resolution of the issues raised in the proceeding (see Domestic Relations Law § 75-h).
The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit. Altman, J.P., Goldstein, H. Miller and Rivera, JJ., concur.