Case Name: In re the SOMERVILLE RAILROAD TIE TREATMENT PLANT
Court: Texas Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 2007-07-10
Citations: 339 S.W.3d 377
Docket Number: No. 07-0380
Parties: In re the SOMERVILLE RAILROAD TIE TREATMENT PLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 339
Pages: 377–378

Head Matter:
In re the SOMERVILLE RAILROAD TIE TREATMENT PLANT.
No. 07-0380.
Texas Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.
July 10, 2007.

Opinion:
THE MOTION FOR TRANSFER IN THE FOLLOWING MULTIDIS-TRICT LITIGATION CASE IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS FOLLOWS:
PER CURIAM.
Having considered the materials filed by the parties in the captioned matter, the panel is not persuaded that the two trial judges handling these cases in Tarrant and Burleson Counties have made significant inconsistent rulings or failed to protect witnesses or parties from inconvenience or duplicative discovery or that such rulings are likely in the future. The motion for transfer is therefore denied without prejudice to file a second motion if the judges issue inconsistent rulings on significant issues or if they do not protect witnesses and parties from duplicative discovery demands or other inconvenience.