Case Name: Garrett Edward HUNTER, III, Petitioner-Appellant, v. D.L. HOBBS, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-05-23
Citations: 34 F. App'x 958
Docket Number: No. 02-6328
Parties: Garrett Edward HUNTER, III, Petitioner-Appellant, v. D.L. HOBBS, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 34
Pages: 958–958

Head Matter:
Garrett Edward HUNTER, III, Petitioner-Appellant, v. D.L. HOBBS, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 02-6328.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 16, 2002.
Decided May 23, 2002.
Garrett Edward Hunter, III, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller, Office of the United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Garrett Edward Hunter, III, appeals the district court's order affirming the magistrate judge's order denying his motion for an extension of time to file objections to the magistrate judge's recommendation in his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders. 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.