Case Name: Earl A. ERNST, Appellant, v. A. G. CLEMENS and H. G. McBride, and A. G. Clemens and H. G. McBride, doing business as Ideal Manufacturing Company, Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1952-03-20
Citations: 195 F.2d 735
Docket Number: No. 12323
Parties: Earl A. ERNST, Appellant, v. A. G. CLEMENS and H. G. McBride, and A. G. Clemens and H. G. McBride, doing business as Ideal Manufacturing Company, Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 195
Pages: 735–735

Head Matter:
Earl A. ERNST, Appellant, v. A. G. CLEMENS and H. G. McBride, and A. G. Clemens and H. G. McBride, doing business as Ideal Manufacturing Company, Appellees.
No. 12323.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
March 20, 1952.
Alan Franklin, Los Angeles, Cal. (J. Calvin Brown, Los Angeles, Cal., of counsel), for appellant.
Herbert A. Huebner, Richard M. Worrel, Fresno, Cal., for appellees.
Before STEPHENS, BONE and ORR, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We granted a rehearing in this case at which counsel were permitted to expand arguments presented at the original hearing. In our first opinion, 9 Cir., 185 F.2d 231, we noted our reasons for affirming the decision of the lower court. The entire record has been carefully reexamined as a result of which we conclude that our original decision was correct