Case Name: BYRNES MILL 206 CORP., et al., Plaintiffs/Respondents. and John V. Harness, Plaintiff/Cross-Appellant, v. CITY OF BYRNES MILL, Ronald Schmidt and Mary Scheble, Appellants/Cross-Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-02-10
Citations: 961 S.W.2d 915
Docket Number: Nos. 72357, 72435
Parties: BYRNES MILL 206 CORP., et al., Plaintiffs/Respondents. and John V. Harness, Plaintiff/Cross-Appellant, v. CITY OF BYRNES MILL, Ronald Schmidt and Mary Scheble, Appellants/Cross-Respondents.
Judges: Before CRANE, P.J., and RHODES RUSSELL and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 961
Pages: 915–915

Head Matter:
BYRNES MILL 206 CORP., et al., Plaintiffs/Respondents. and John V. Harness, Plaintiff/Cross-Appellant, v. CITY OF BYRNES MILL, Ronald Schmidt and Mary Scheble, Appellants/Cross-Respondents.
Nos. 72357, 72435.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Feb. 10, 1998.
Herbert K. Hoffman, Clayton, for appellants.
Charles F. Dufour, Bradley J. Bakula, St. Louis, Bedker, Dufour & Yarbrough, C. Finn Sheehan, High Ridge, for respondents.
Before CRANE, P.J., and RHODES RUSSELL and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a judgment against defendants for malicious prosecution and violations of 42 U.S.C. Sec.1983. There is sufficient evidence to support the judgment. No error of law appears.
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
We further grant Byrnes Mill 206 Corporation's motion for attorneys' fees incurred on appeal in the amount of $5,466.00.