Case Name: Jasmine BOLDEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2019-04-16
Citations: 571 S.W.3d 699
Docket Number: No. ED 106734
Parties: Jasmine BOLDEN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Colleen Dolan, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 571
Pages: 699–700

Head Matter:
Jasmine BOLDEN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 106734
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
Filed: April 16, 2019
Maleaner R. Harvey, 1010 Market St. Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Movant/Appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Defendant/Respondent.
Before Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Colleen Dolan, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Jasmine Bolden ("Movant") appeals the motion court's denial of her Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief motion without an evidentiary hearing. Movant offers one point on appeal. Finding that Movant has failed to demonstrate that the motion court clearly erred in denying her Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing, we affirm the judgment of the motion court.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).