Case Name: Gay Eugene BLANKENSHIP, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Doug MITCHELL, Superintendent, Craggy Correctional, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-08-30
Citations: 196 F. App'x 225
Docket Number: No. 06-6433
Parties: Gay Eugene BLANKENSHIP, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Doug MITCHELL, Superintendent, Craggy Correctional, Respondent—Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 196
Pages: 225–226

Head Matter:
Gay Eugene BLANKENSHIP, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Doug MITCHELL, Superintendent, Craggy Correctional, Respondent—Appellee.
No. 06-6433.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 24, 2006.
Decided: Aug. 30, 2006.
Gay Eugene Blankenship, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge III, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Gay Eugene Blankenship, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.
Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court's final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corr., 434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (1960)).
The district court's judgment was entered on the docket on January 20, 2006. The notice of appeal, which Blankenship himself dated February 26, 2006, was late. Because Blankenship has failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED