Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alfonso Eduardo NINOV, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1972-05-09
Citations: 458 F.2d 1360
Docket Number: No. 72-1062
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alfonso Eduardo NINOV, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 458
Pages: 1360–1360

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alfonso Eduardo NINOV, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 72-1062
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
May 9, 1972.
Rehearing Denied June 1, 1972.
Before BELL, DYER and CLARK, Circuit Judges.
Rule 18, 5 Cir., Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed. See Local Rule 21. The statements of Armenteros inculpating Ninov made during the commission of the crime were properly admitted into evidence, given the independent evidence of concert of action between the two. Migliore v. United States, 5 Cir., 1969, 409 F.2d 786; United States v. Williams, 9 Cir., 1970, 435 F.2d 642; United States v. Bey, 3 Cir., 1971, 437 F.2d 188. In addition, there is no merit in the assignments of error based on an alleged insufficiency of the evidence.
. See N. L. R. B. v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966.