Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Stacey A. LANNERT, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-09-19
Citations: 905 S.W.2d 929
Docket Number: No. 63563
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Stacey A. LANNERT, Appellant.
Judges: Before CRAHAN, P.J., and CRANDALL and DOWD, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 905
Pages: 929–930

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Stacey A. LANNERT, Appellant.
No. 63563.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Sept. 19, 1995.
Ellen H. Flottman, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Traci J. Sanders, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before CRAHAN, P.J., and CRANDALL and DOWD, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appealed her judgments of conviction by a jury of first degree murder, § 565.020, RSMo 1986, and armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo 1986, as well as the denial of her Rule 29.15 Motion for post-conviction relief. See State v. Lannert, 889 S.W.2d 131 (Mo.App.E.D.1994). We affirmed in all respects except we remanded for a gender-Batson hearing. Id. at 135. The trial court denied her objection that the State impermissibly used its preemptory strikes in a gender-biased manner. Defendant claims this was error. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. Rule 30.25(b).