Case Name: Kevin L. PERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BRISTOL MEYER SQUIB, a public corporation; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-02-25
Citations: 31 F. App'x 445
Docket Number: No. 01-55181; D.C. No. CV-99-01099-IEG
Parties: Kevin L. PERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BRISTOL MEYER SQUIB, a public corporation; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 31
Pages: 445–445

Head Matter:
Kevin L. PERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BRISTOL MEYER SQUIB, a public corporation; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 01-55181. D.C. No. CV-99-01099-IEG.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 11, 2002.
Decided Feb. 25, 2002.
Before B. FLETCHER, T.G. NELSON, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Kevin L. Perry appeals pro se the district court's denial of his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a Rule 60(b) motion, Allmerica Fin. Life Ins. & Annuity Co. v. Llewellyn, 139 F.3d 664, 665 (9th Cir.1997), and we affirm because none of the applicable grounds for relief exists in this case, see Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah County v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1263 (9th Cir.1993).
Perry's additional contentions lack merit.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.