Case Name: OGDEN ALLIED SERVICES, Alexis Insurance, Appellants, v. Gustavo PANESSO, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-10-28
Citations: 625 So. 2d 997
Docket Number: No. 92-3964
Parties: OGDEN ALLIED SERVICES, Alexis Insurance, Appellants, v. Gustavo PANESSO, Appellee.
Judges: ZEHMER, C.J., and MINER and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 625
Pages: 997–997

Head Matter:
OGDEN ALLIED SERVICES, Alexis Insurance, Appellants, v. Gustavo PANESSO, Appellee.
No. 92-3964.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Oct. 28, 1993.
Henry Fierro and Jay M. Levy, Miami, for appellants.
Jerold Feuer, Miami, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In Ogden Allied Services v. Panesso, 619 So.2d 1024 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993), this court reversed an order of the judge of compensation claims when it found there was error in refusing to allow surveillance films to be introduced into evidence for purposes of impeachment or rebuttal. Here, appellants appeal a final compensation order which awarded wage loss benefits. The order to be reviewed emanated from the same proceedings which resulted in reversal in the prior appeal. Appellee confesses error and agrees that under the circumstances the order must be reversed.
ZEHMER, C.J., and MINER and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.