Case Name: Kerwin D. SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-02-14
Citations: 358 S.W.3d 587
Docket Number: No. ED 96557
Parties: Kerwin D. SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J. and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 358
Pages: 587–587

Head Matter:
Kerwin D. SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 96557.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Feb. 14, 2012.
Maleaner Harvey, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Dora A. Fichter, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J. and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Kerwin Scott appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying Scott's request for post-conviction relief. We affirm.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum sét-ting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).