Case Name: John THOMPSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Harry F. CONNICK, in His Official Capacity as District Attorney and in His Individual Capacity; Eric Dubelier, in His Official Capacity as Assistant District Attorney; James Williams, in His Official Capacity as Assistant District Attorney; Eddie Jordan, in His Official Capacity as District Attorney; Orleans Parish District Attorney's Office, Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-05-18
Citations: 426 F. App'x 247
Docket Number: No. 10-30035
Parties: John THOMPSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Harry F. CONNICK, in His Official Capacity as District Attorney and in His Individual Capacity; Eric Dubelier, in His Official Capacity as Assistant District Attorney; James Williams, in His Official Capacity as Assistant District Attorney; Eddie Jordan, in His Official Capacity as District Attorney; Orleans Parish District Attorney’s Office, Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 426
Pages: 247–247

Head Matter:
John THOMPSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Harry F. CONNICK, in His Official Capacity as District Attorney and in His Individual Capacity; Eric Dubelier, in His Official Capacity as Assistant District Attorney; James Williams, in His Official Capacity as Assistant District Attorney; Eddie Jordan, in His Official Capacity as District Attorney; Orleans Parish District Attorney’s Office, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 10-30035.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
May 18, 2011.
Michael L. Banks, Esq., J. Gordon Cooney, Jr., Esq., Managing Senior Counsel, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, L.L.P., Philadelphia, PA, Robert S. Glass, Esq., Glass & Reed, Carol A. Kolinchak, Juvenile Justice Project of Louisiana, Nicholas Joseph Trenticosta, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Fred L. Herman, Esq., Law Offices of Fred L. Herman, Donna Rau Andrieu, Assistant District Attorney, District Attorney’s Office, New Orleans, LA, for Defendants-Appellants.
Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The defendants challenge an award of supplemental attorney's fees and costs. In Connick v. Thompson, — U.S.-, 131 S.Ct. 1350, 179 L.Ed.2d 417 (2011), the Court reversed this court's affirmance, see Thompson v. Connick, 578 F.3d 293 (5th Cir.2009) (en banc) (per curiam) (affirming by equally divided court), of the district court's award of damages and fees. The parties have submitted letter briefs, on request, and agree that the award of supplemental fees should be reversed. This court has now remanded the underlying action for entry of judgment. See Thompson v. Connick, — F.3d -, 2011 U.S.App. LEXIS 9758 (5th Cir. May 13, 2011) (en banc) (per curiam).
The award of supplemental fees and costs is therefore REVERSED, and this matter is REMANDED for further proceedings, if any, that may be required.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.