Case Name: KEITH MACHINERY CORPORATION, A NEW YORK CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THE BOROUGH OF SOUTH PLAINFIELD AND JOHN BORI, TAX COLLECTOR, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1966-06-17
Citations: 91 N.J. Super. 469
Docket Number: 
Parties: KEITH MACHINERY CORPORATION, A NEW YORK CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THE BOROUGH OF SOUTH PLAINFIELD AND JOHN BORI, TAX COLLECTOR, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 91
Pages: 469–469

Head Matter:
KEITH MACHINERY CORPORATION, A NEW YORK CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THE BOROUGH OF SOUTH PLAINFIELD AND JOHN BORI, TAX COLLECTOR, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued June 13,1966
Decided June 17, 1966.
Before Judges Conford, Kilkenny and Leonard.
Mr. John T. Keefe argued the cause for appellants (Mr. Edward J. Santoro, attorney).
Mr. Robert Silver argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Bilder, Bilder, Silver & McCurley, attorneys).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons stated by Judge Gerofsky in his opinion.