Case Name: JULIA CONNOLLY, RESPONDENT, v. PALISADES REALTY AND AMUSEMENT COMPANY, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1934-04-12
Citations: 112 N.J.L. 502
Docket Number: 
Parties: JULIA CONNOLLY, RESPONDENT, v. PALISADES REALTY AND AMUSEMENT COMPANY, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 112
Pages: 502–503

Head Matter:
JULIA CONNOLLY, RESPONDENT, v. PALISADES REALTY AND AMUSEMENT COMPANY, APPELLANT.
Submitted February 16, 1934
Decided April 12, 1934.
For the respondent, Thomas J. Stanton.
For the appellant, Walter W. Huhley, Jr.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Trenchard, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Yan Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.