Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jacob FENTON, also known as Solo, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-12-17
Citations: 548 F. App'x 297
Docket Number: No. 13-10135
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jacob FENTON, also known as Solo, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before DAVIS, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 548
Pages: 297–297

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jacob FENTON, also known as Solo, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-10135
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 17, 2013.
James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Dallas, TX, Matthew John Guide, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Mark R. Danielson, Attorney, Mansfield, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before DAVIS, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Jacob Fenton has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Fenton has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.