Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MICHAEL SCOTT LEGORE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2011-02-16
Citations: 240 Or. App. 807
Docket Number: CR0801040; A143287
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MICHAEL SCOTT LEGORE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Armstrong, Judge, and Duncan, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 240
Pages: 807–808

Head Matter:
Submitted January 7,
reversed and remanded February 16, 2011
STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MICHAEL SCOTT LEGORE, Defendant-Appellant.
Clackamas County Circuit Court
CR0801040; A143287
247 P3d 1280
Garrett A. Richardson and Multnomah Defenders, Inc., filed the brief for appellant.
John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Matthew J. Lysne, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Armstrong, Judge, and Duncan, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for first-degree unlawful sexual penetration, ORS 163.411, and first-degree sexual abuse, ORS 163.427, contending that "[t]he court erred by admitting a medical diagnosis of sexual abuse that was made without any confirmatory physical evidence." A statement of the facts would not benefit the bench, the bar, or the public. The state concedes that "the trial court committed reversible error under OEC 403 in light of State v. Southard, 347 Or 127, 218 P3d 104 (2009)[,] when it admitted the testimony of a nurse practitioner" in which "she diagnosed the victim as 'highly concerning' for sexual abuse." We agree and accept the concession.
Reversed and remanded.