Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Duvall HUCKS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-03-11
Citations: 30 F. App'x 259
Docket Number: No. 01-7540
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Duvall HUCKS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before LUTTIG, DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 30
Pages: 259–259

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Duvall HUCKS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 01-7540.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 30, 2002.
Decided March 11, 2002.
Duvall Hueks, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Suzanne Skalla, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before LUTTIG, DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Duvall Hueks seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hucks, Nos. CR-95-267-AW; CA-00-2970-AW (D.Md. Aug. 28, 2001). We deny Hueks' Motion Pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 12(b)(2). United States v. Kinter, 235 F.3d 192, 199-201 (4th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 937, 121 S.Ct. 1393, 149 L.Ed.2d 316 (2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Upon review of the entire record, we reject all of Hueks' claims concerning an alleged conflict of interest on the part of his first counsel.