Case Name: The State of Ohio v. Clem Corwin
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1922
Citations: 1 Ohio Law Abs. 134
Docket Number: No. 17756
Parties: The State of Ohio v. Clem Corwin.
Judges: Marshall, C. J. Hough, Robinson, Jones, Matthias and Clark, JJ., concur.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 1
Pages: 134–134

Head Matter:
No. 17756.
The State of Ohio v. Clem Corwin.
On Exceptions of the Prosecuting Attorney of Seneca County, Ohio.
CRIMINAL LAW — Acquittal for rape does not preclude second prosecution for rape with consent.

Opinion:
WANAMAKER, J.:
Where one is tried upon a charge of rape with force and violence, under Section 12413, General Code, and upon trial is acquitteed of such charge, and thereafter he is indicted under Section 12414, General Code, charging rape with consent, and interposes a plea of former jeopardy to the second indictment, such plea upon demurrer of the state should be overruled. (State v. Rose, 89 Ohio St., 383, approved and followed.)
Exceptions sustained.
Marshall, C. J. Hough, Robinson, Jones, Matthias and Clark, JJ., concur.