Case Name: Office of Disciplinary Counsel et al. v. Nentwick
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1999-02-10
Citations: 84 Ohio St. 3d 491
Docket Number: No. 98-1323
Parties: Office of Disciplinary Counsel et al. v. Nentwick.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 84
Pages: 491–496

Head Matter:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel et al. v. Nentwick.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Nentwick (1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 491.]
(No. 98-1323
Submitted October 28, 1998
Decided February 10, 1999.)
Jonathan E. Coughlan, Disciplinary Counsel, and Lori J. Brown, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator Office of Disciplinary Counsel.
Mark A. Hutson and Frederic E. Naragon, for relator Columbiana County Bar •Association.
R. Eric Kibler, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We adopt the findings of the board and its conclusions, except the conclusion that in the MacKall matter respondent violated DR 7-102(A)(2) (knowingly advancing a claim or defense unwarranted under existing law), which the board erroneously characterized as "failing to carry out a contract of employment." We also adopt the recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby permanently disbarred from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs are taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.