Case Name: Michael L. JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LIEBER CI; Perry CI Warden Larry Cartledge; Assoc Warden Florence Mauney; Richard L. Turner, SCDC Disciplinary Hearing Officer; D Filmore, Inmate Classification Committee. Chairperson; SCDC Inmate Grievance Branch Headqtrs; Perry Correctional Institution; SC Department of Corrections, Individually, and in their official Capacities, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-12-23
Citations: 589 F. App'x 118
Docket Number: No. 14-7162
Parties: Michael L. JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LIEBER CI; Perry CI Warden Larry Cartledge; Assoc Warden Florence Mauney; Richard L. Turner, SCDC Disciplinary Hearing Officer; D Filmore, Inmate Classification Committee. Chairperson; SCDC Inmate Grievance Branch Headqtrs; Perry Correctional Institution; SC Department of Corrections, Individually, and in their official Capacities, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 589
Pages: 118–119

Head Matter:
Michael L. JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LIEBER CI; Perry CI Warden Larry Cartledge; Assoc Warden Florence Mauney; Richard L. Turner, SCDC Disciplinary Hearing Officer; D Filmore, Inmate Classification Committee. Chairperson; SCDC Inmate Grievance Branch Headqtrs; Perry Correctional Institution; SC Department of Corrections, Individually, and in their official Capacities, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 14-7162.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 18, 2014.
Decided: Dec. 23, 2014.
Michael L. Jones, Appellant Pro Se. James Adam Russell, Charles Franklin Turner, Jr., Willson Jones Carter & Bax-ley, P.A., Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael L. Jones appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Jones' 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jones v. Lieber Corr. Inst, No. 2:13-ev-02034-JFA, 2014 WL 3687414 (D.S.C. July 23, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.