Case Name: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Marc PERFETTO, Petitioner
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2018-02-27
Citations: 182 A.3d 435
Docket Number: No. 455 EAL 2017
Parties: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent
v.
Marc PERFETTO, Petitioner
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 182
Pages: 435–435

Head Matter:
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent
v.
Marc PERFETTO, Petitioner
No. 455 EAL 2017
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
February 27, 2018
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 27th day of February, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are:
(1) Whether [the] Superior Court erred in determining that [the] Philadelphia Municipal Court - Traffic Division has sole jurisdiction over summary traffic offenses even when those charges are part of a single incident which also includes a misdemeanor and/or felony charges? Is this decision in conflict with 18 Pa.C.S. § 110, the 2002 amendment thereto removing jurisdiction as an element of the offense, its constitutional underpinnings, and decisions of this Court?
(2) Where the lower [c]ourt dismissed the prosecution under 18 Pa.C.S. § 110 because all the prongs of the test for dismissal under that statute were met, did the trial [c]ourt properly dismiss the charges?