Case Name: ASSOCIATED GAS DISTRIBUTORS, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent. And Consolidated Cases
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Decision Date: 1990-03-30
Citations: 283 U.S. App. D.C. 212
Docket Number: No. 88-1385
Parties: ASSOCIATED GAS DISTRIBUTORS, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent. And Consolidated Cases.
Judges: Before WALD, Chief Judge; MIKVA, EDWARDS, RUTH BADER GINSBURG, SILBERMAN, BUCKLEY, WILLIAMS, D.H. GINSBURG, SENTELLE and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Volume: 283
Pages: 212–214

Head Matter:
898 F.2d 809
ASSOCIATED GAS DISTRIBUTORS, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent. And Consolidated Cases.
No. 88-1385.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
March 30, 1990.
Before WALD, Chief Judge; MIKVA, EDWARDS, RUTH BADER GINSBURG, SILBERMAN, BUCKLEY, WILLIAMS, D.H. GINSBURG, SENTELLE and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The Suggestions for Rehearing En Banc of the various parties have been circulated to the full court. The taking of a vote was requested only on the issue of whether the equitable sharing mechanism mandated by respondent in Order No. 500. violates the filed rate doctrine. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular, active service did not vote in favor of rehearing en banc. Upon consideration of the foregoing it is
ORDERED by the Court en banc that all of the suggestions are denied.
Circuit Judges D.H. GINSBURG and CLARENCE THOMAS did not participate in this order.
A statement of Circuit Judge STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc is attached.
A statement of Chief Judge WALD dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc, joined by Circuit Judges MIKVA and HARRY T. EDWARDS, is also attached.