Case Name: Sven Grasshoff, Respondent, v. Aaron Etra, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2016-01-19
Citations: 135 A.D.3d 574
Docket Number: 
Parties: Sven Grasshoff, Respondent, v Aaron Etra, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 135
Pages: 574–575

Head Matter:
Sven Grasshoff, Respondent, v Aaron Etra, Appellant.
[22 NYS3d 857]

Opinion:
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered October 30, 2014, in favor of plaintiff, in the total amount of $192,895.60, pursuant to an order, same court and Justice, which, to the extent appealed from, granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on his conversion cause of action, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from aforesaid order, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment.
Plaintiff established his prima facie entitlement to summary judgment on his conversion claim by submitting deposition testimony, financial transfer documents and correspondences showing that he transferred his personal funds into an apparent escrow account maintained by defendant, that defendant intentionally retransferred those funds to a different individual without plaintiffs permission, and that the transfer effectively deprived plaintiff of the funds, which were never recovered (see State of New York v Seventh Regiment Fund, 98 NY2d 249, 259-260 [2002]; Colavito v New York Organ Donor Network, Inc., 8 NY3d 43, 49-50 [2006]). In opposition, defendant failed to raise a triable issue of fact.
We have considered defendant's remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Tom, J.P., Friedman, Saxe and Kapnick, JJ.