Case Name: Earl L. CRAMER, Petitioner, v. BROEDELL PLUMBING SUPPLY, et al., Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-06-13
Citations: 675 So. 2d 118
Docket Number: No. 86709
Parties: Earl L. CRAMER, Petitioner, v. BROEDELL PLUMBING SUPPLY, et al., Respondents.
Judges: KOGAN, C.J., and OVERTON, GRIMES, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 675
Pages: 118–118

Head Matter:
Earl L. CRAMER, Petitioner, v. BROEDELL PLUMBING SUPPLY, et al., Respondents.
No. 86709.
Supreme Court of Florida.
June 13, 1996.
Alex Lancaster and Amy L. Sergent of Lancaster and Eure, P.A., Sarasota, and Claire Hamner Matturro, Cairo, Georgia, for Petitioner.
James G. Trope and Elizabeth J. Muller of Florida Employers Insurance Service Corporation, Sarasota, for Respondents.
Edward A. Dion, General Counsel and David C. Hawkins, Senior Attorney, Tallahassee, for Intervenor, Department of Labor and Employment Security, Division of Workers’ Compensation.

Opinion:
SHAW, Justice.
We have for review Cramer v. Brodell Plumbing Co., 661 So.2d 122 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995), wherein the district court certified:
Whether section [440.15(3)(b)4.d.], Florida Statutes (1991), is subject to and comports with the requirements of Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act?
We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We have already answered in the affirmative. See Barry v. Burdines, 675 So.2d 587 (Fla.1996). We approve Cramer.
It is so ordered.
KOGAN, C.J., and OVERTON, GRIMES, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.