Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. ROOSEVELT JENKINS, Appellant
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1967-03-15
Citations: 246 Or. 280
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. ROOSEVELT JENKINS, Appellant.
Judges: Before McAllister, J., Presiding, and O’Connell, Goodwin and Fort, Justices.
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 246
Pages: 280–281

Head Matter:
Argued March 8,
affirmed March 15, 1967
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. ROOSEVELT JENKINS, Appellant.
424 P. 2d 894
Oscar D. Eowlett, Portland, argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant.
Jacob B. Tamer, Deputy District Attorney, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was George Van Hoomissen, District Attorney, Portland.
Before McAllister, J., Presiding, and O’Connell, Goodwin and Fort, Justices.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals from a burglary conviction, contending that the court erred in excluding certain evidence.
No offer of proof was made and consequently, even if the evidence was admissible, we have no way of determining whether the exclusion of the evidence was prejudicial to defendant.
The judgment is affirmed.