Case Name: Harold Kartinganer and Another, Copartners, etc., Appellants, v. Joseph Cohn and Another, Individually and as Copartners, Trading as Cohn & Kaplan, and Cohn & Kaplan, Inc., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1927-06-30
Citations: 129 Misc. 910
Docket Number: 
Parties: Harold Kartinganer and Another, Copartners, etc., Appellants, v. Joseph Cohn and Another, Individually and as Copartners, Trading as Cohn & Kaplan, and Cohn & Kaplan, Inc., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 129
Pages: 910–911

Head Matter:
Harold Kartinganer and Another, Copartners, etc., Appellants, v. Joseph Cohn and Another, Individually and as Copartners, Trading as Cohn & Kaplan, and Cohn & Kaplan, Inc., Respondents.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
June 30, 1927.
Samuel Horowitz, for the appellants.
Maxwell E. Lopin, for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The retention of the check, marked " in full," for an unreasonable length of time will be deemed an acceptance of the condition on which the payment was made. (Patten v. Lynett, 133 App. Div. 746.)
• Judgment affirmed, with twenty-five dollars costs.
All concur; present, Bum?, Levy and Crain, JJ.