Case Name: Alfred R. Tooker et al., complainants, v. Rose Maple et al., defendants
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1921-10-14
Citations: 93 N.J. Eq. 224
Docket Number: 
Parties: Alfred R. Tooker et al., complainants, v. Rose Maple et al., defendants.
Judges: For affirmance — Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Katzenbact-i, I-Ieppent-ieimer, Gardner — 8.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 93
Pages: 224–224

Head Matter:
Alfred R. Tooker et al., complainants, v. Rose Maple et al., defendants.
[Decided October 14th, 1921.]
On appeal from a decree of the court, of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Backes., and reported in!9B N. J. Eg. 3J+0.
Appeal of Walter J. Vreeland et al.
Messrs. Collins & Corbin, for the complainants.
Messrs. Coult & Woodruff, Mr. Carl Saenger and Mr. William A. Lord, for the defendants.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.
For affirmance — Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Katzenbact-i, I-Ieppent-ieimer, Gardner — 8.
For reversal — Tiie Chief-Justice, Swayze, Kalisci-i, Williams, Van Buskirk — 5.