Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jabar Eugene CURRENCE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-08-22
Citations: 290 F. App'x 556
Docket Number: No. 08-7170
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jabar Eugene CURRENCE, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 290
Pages: 556–556

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jabar Eugene CURRENCE, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 08-7170.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 14, 2008.
Decided: Aug. 22, 2008.
Jabar Eugene Currence, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Jabar Eugene Currence appeals the district court's order denying his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000), seeking a reduction to his sentence based on an amendment to the Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we find the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir.2004) (motion under § 3582(c) "is subject to the discretion of the district court"); United States v. Legree, 205 F.3d 724, 727 (4th Cir.2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.