Case Name: ALBERT G. LUCHSINGER, Executor, etc., Petitioner, v. JAMES ROLPH, Jr., et al., Respondents
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1922-07-11
Citations: 58 Cal. App. 789
Docket Number: Civ. No. 4320
Parties: ALBERT G. LUCHSINGER, Executor, etc., Petitioner, v. JAMES ROLPH, Jr., et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports
Volume: 58
Pages: 789–789

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 4320.
First Appellate District, Division Two.
July 11, 1922.]
ALBERT G. LUCHSINGER, Executor, etc., Petitioner, v. JAMES ROLPH, Jr., et al., Respondents.
Municipal Corporations—Recovery of Taxes Paid Under Protest —Payment of Judgment—Levy of Tax-—Constitutional Law.— Peremptory writ of mandate issued on the authority of Oscar Beyman Brother (a Corporation) v. Edwin C. Bath et al., ante, p. 499.
PROCEEDING in Mandamus to require the levy and collection of a tax. sufficient to pay a judgment against a municipality. Writ granted.
The facts are the same as those stated in the opinion in Oscar Hey man & Brother (a Corporation) v. Edwin C. Bath et al., ante, p. 499.
Keyes & Erskine for Petitioner.
George Lull, City Attorney, and Maurice T. Dooling, Jr., Assistant City Attorney, for Respondents.

Opinion:
THE COURT.
Let a peremptory writ issue as prayed on the authority of Oscar Heyman & Brother (a Corporation) v. Edwin C. Bath et al., ante, p. 499 [208 Pac. 981].
A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on September 7, 1922.
All the Justices present concurred.
Richards, J., pro tern., and Myers, J., pro tern., were acting.