Case Name: GRAVELLY FORD CANAL COMPANY (a Corporation), Appellant, v. POPE & TALBOT LAND COMPANY (a Corporation), Respondent
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1918-04-09
Citations: 36 Cal. App. 817
Docket Number: Civ. No. 1800
Parties: GRAVELLY FORD CANAL COMPANY (a Corporation), Appellant, v. POPE & TALBOT LAND COMPANY (a Corporation), Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports
Volume: 36
Pages: 817–818

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 1800.
Third Appellate District.
April 9, 1918.]
GRAVELLY FORD CANAL COMPANY (a Corporation), Appellant, v. POPE & TALBOT LAND COMPANY (a Corporation), Respondent.
Parol License—Construction of Canal—Injunction.—Judgment reversed on the authority of Gravelly Ford Canal Co. v. Pope Talbot Land Co., ante, p. 717.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Madera County. Wm. M. Conley, Judge.
The facts are similar to those stated in Gravelly Ford Canal Co. v. Pope & Talbot Land Co., ante, p. 717.
Edward F. Treadwell, for Appellant.
J. W. Dorsey, and W. E. Cashman, for Respondent.

Opinion:
CHIPMAN, P. J.
This is an action in which a temporary injunction was granted in the same case as No. 1801, in which latter a permanent injunction was granted. Apparently the matter was heard upon the same record in both cases, except certain maps are found in No. 1800 not attached to the record in No. 1801.
We have considered the questions involved in dealing with the permanent injunction in No. 1801, which would seem to make it unnecessary to consider at any length the questions involved in No. 1800, for they are practically the same in both cases.
On the authority of the case No. 1801, the judgment is reversed.
Hart, J., and Burnett, J., concurred.
A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court June 6, 1918.