Case Name: Paul Daddona et al. v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Stamford
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1966-11-01
Citations: 154 Conn. 728
Docket Number: 
Parties: Paul Daddona et al. v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Stamford
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 154
Pages: 728–728

Head Matter:
Paul Daddona et al. v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Stamford
Milton Turhel, for the appellants (plaintiffs).
Theodore Godlin, for the appellee (defendant).
Argued November 1
decided November 1, 1966

Opinion:
It appearing that the plaintiffs in the above-entitled case have failed to prosecute their appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Fairfield County at Stamford with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed.