Case Name: Leonard J. KLAY, M.D., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Ian K. COOK, Dr., Defendant-Appellant, Cigna Defendants, Cigna Healthcare of Texas, Inc., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-10-07
Citations: 295 F. App'x 956
Docket Number: No. 05-17170
Parties: Leonard J. KLAY, M.D., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Ian K. COOK, Dr., Defendant-Appellant, Cigna Defendants, Cigna Healthcare of Texas, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 295
Pages: 956–956

Head Matter:
Leonard J. KLAY, M.D., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Ian K. COOK, Dr., Defendant-Appellant, Cigna Defendants, Cigna Healthcare of Texas, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 05-17170.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Oct. 7, 2008.
David Henry Pollack, Law Office of David H. Pollack, LLC, Miami, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Eduardo W. Gonzalez, Thomas R. Julin, Hunton & Williams, Miami, FL, Dianne M. Keppler, Hunton & Williams LLP, Washington, DC, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, ANDERSON, Circuit Judge, and COHILL, District Judge.
Honorable Maurice B. Cohill, Jr., United States District Judge for the Western District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
After oral argument and careful consideration, we readily conclude that the judgment of the district court is due to be affirmed. For the reasons discussed at oral argument, we conclude that the notice of the class action settlement amply satisfied the requirements of due process. We also conclude that Dr. Cook failed to preserve in the district court his argument that some of his claims were not "finally adjudicated" and thus should have been excluded from the claims released by the settlement agreement.
AFFIRMED.