Case Name: Trevor K. SALLER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2015-05-12
Citations: 461 S.W.3d 849
Docket Number: No. ED 101844
Parties: Trevor K. SALLER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Mary K. . Hóff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 461
Pages: 849–850

Head Matter:
Trevor K. SALLER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 101844
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
FILED: May 12, 2015
Trevor K. Sailer, Pro Se, # 1185401, S.C.C.C., 255 S. Highway 32, Licking, MO 65542, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Adam Stephen Rowley, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MÓ 65102, for respondent.
Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Mary K. . Hóff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Trevor K. Sailer (Movant) appeals from the motion court's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Judgment (judgment) on Movant's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct the Judgment and Sentence denying Movant's Rule 24.035 claims for post-conviction relief (PCR Motion) following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).