Case Name: Bertha Baumann, appellant, v. Reginald B. Naugle et al., respondents
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1925-09-29
Citations: 98 N.J. Eq. 687
Docket Number: 
Parties: Bertha Baumann, appellant, v. Reginald B. Naugle et al., respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 98
Pages: 687–687

Head Matter:
Bertha Baumann, appellant, v. Reginald B. Naugle et al., respondents.
[Decided September 29th, 1925.]
Mr. Earl A. Merrill, for the appellant.
Mr. Augustus G. Nash, for the respondents.

Opinion:
Pee Cuetam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan.
For affirmance- — The Chiee-Justice, Parker, Minturn, Kaltsoh, Black, Katzenbaoi-i, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Bus kirk, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.