Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Reginald SMITH, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-06-11
Citations: 80 S.W.3d 483
Docket Number: No. ED 79713
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Reginald SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 80
Pages: 483–483

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Reginald SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.
No. ED 79713.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
June 11, 2002.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 23, 2002.
Lawrence L. Pratt, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Dora A. Fichter, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Reginald Smith, the defendant, appeals the judgment entered upon his conviction for one count of trafficking in the second degree, in violation of section 195.223 RSMo. (2000). He claims the trial court erred in its denial of his motion to suppress and its admission of the challenged evidence. Upon review of the record, we find that the trial court was not clearly erroneous in denying the defendant's motion. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).