Case Name: In re Salsbury
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1955-10-26
Citations: 164 Ohio St. 229
Docket Number: No. 34388
Parties: In re Salsbury.
Judges: Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Stewart, Bell and Taet, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, New Service
Volume: 164
Pages: 229–230

Head Matter:
In re Salsbury.
(No. 34388
Decided October 26, 1955.)
Mr. William J. Butterfield, for appellee petitioner.
Mr. Harry Friberg, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. Donald Bradley, for appellant respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The Court of Appeals was in error in ordering petitioner released from custody in the habeas corpus proceeding. The remedy for review of any errors or irregularities in the conduct of the proceeding in which petitioner was refused release from jail is by appeal and not by a habeas corpus proceeding, since the committing court had jurisdiction of the subject matter and the person of petitioner. Ellis v. State, 158 Ohio St., 489, 110 N. E. (2d), 179.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and petitioner remanded to custody.
Judgment reversed.
Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Stewart, Bell and Taet, JJ., concur.