Case Name: Lipman's, Inc., Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent
Court: United States Board of Tax Appeals
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1928-10-30
Citations: 13 B.T.A. 1274
Docket Number: Docket No. 15093
Parties: Lipman’s, Inc., Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Reports of the United States Board of Tax Appeals
Volume: 13
Pages: 1274–1276

Head Matter:
Lipman’s, Inc., Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent.
Docket No. 15093.
Promulgated October 30, 1928.
Charles H. Sachs, Esq., for the petitioner.
T. M. Mather, Esq., for the respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION.
Lowe :
The question in this case is whether or not the debts alleged to have been ascertained as worthless in 1920 and 1921, respectively, are deductible from gross income under section 214 (a) (7) of the Revenue Act of 1918, and the corresponding section in the 1921 Act.
The 1918 Act prescribes as deductible "Debts ascertained to be worthless and charged off within the taxable year."
The evidence in this case is far from convincing that petitioner determined in 1920 that the contracts, aggregating $9,490.60, were, worthless. Those accounts were credited to a reserve account, which retained them in its asset accounts.
The accounts aggregating $7,255.23, which petitioner claims now should be allowed as a deduction in 1921, seem never to have been treated by it as worthless until December, 1924 — not even carried to the reserve account, and hence, under section 234 (a) (5) of the 1921 Act, they are not deductible.
However, should the question of ascertainment of worthlessness be waived, the debts were not charged off in the taxable years, not until December, 1924. The statute is clear and specific on this point, and must be followed.
Judgment will be entered for the respondent.