Case Name: Charles E. Keefer v. The Common Council of the City of Hillsdale
Court: Michigan Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Michigan
Decision Date: 1888-05-18
Citations: 70 Mich. 413
Docket Number: 
Parties: Charles E. Keefer v. The Common Council of the City of Hillsdale.
Judges: The other Justices concurred.
Reporter: Michigan Reports
Volume: 70
Pages: 413–413

Head Matter:
Charles E. Keefer v. The Common Council of the City of Hillsdale.
Local option law.
This case is ruled by the opinion In re Hauck, ante, 396.
Mandamus.
Argued May 1, and re-argued May 15, 1888.
Granted May 18, 1888.
Eelator applies for mandamus to compel respondent to approve of his bond as a retail liquor dealer. The facts are-stated In re Hauck, ante, 396, as also the points of counsel.
F. A. Baker, for relator.
Moses Taggart, Attorney General, G. A. Shepard, Prosecuting Attorney, and Guy M. Chester, City Attorney, for respondent.

Opinion:
Champlin, J.
This case is ruled by the opinion filed In re Hauck, ante, 396.
The mandamus will issue to compel the common council to proceed under Act No. 313, Laws of 1887, in such case made and provided.
The other Justices concurred.