Case Name: The State of Ohio, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. Henderson, Appellee and Cross-Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1993-05-12
Citations: 66 Ohio St. 3d 1219
Docket Number: No. 92-1004
Parties: The State of Ohio, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. Henderson, Appellee and Cross-Appellant.
Judges: A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 66
Pages: 1219–1219

Head Matter:
The State of Ohio, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. Henderson, Appellee and Cross-Appellant.
[Cite as State v. Henderson (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 1219.]
(No. 92-1004
Submitted April 6, 1993
Decided May 12, 1993.)
Stephanie Tubbs Jones, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and George Rukovena, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant and crossappellee.
Hyman Friedman, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and Beverly J. Pyle, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee and cross-appellant.

Opinion:
The appeal and cross-appeal are dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.
A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Moyer, C.J., dissents, and would affirm on the issue of murder, but would reverse on the issue of forgery and tampering with records.