Case Name: Cincinnati Bar Association v. Arnold
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2001-09-14
Citations: 93 Ohio St. 3d 1205
Docket Number: No. 98-2663
Parties: Cincinnati Bar Association v. Arnold.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 93
Pages: 1205–1206

Head Matter:
Cincinnati Bar Association v. Arnold.
[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Arnold (2001), 93 Ohio St.3d 1205.]
(No. 98-2663
Submitted August 28, 2001
Decided September 14, 2001.)

Opinion:
This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of a petition for reinstatement by respondent, S. Richard Arnold, a.k.a. Stuart Richard Arnold. In accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(10)(F), respondent's petition for reinstatement was referred to the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline. The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline filed its Final Report in this court on July 3, 2001, recommending that S. Richard Arnold, a.k.a. Stuart Richard Arnold, be reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. No objections to the Final Report were filed.
The court now considers its order of March 31, 1999, indefinitely suspending respondent, S. Richard Arnold, a.k.a. Stuart Richard Arnold, from the practice of law pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(2). On consideration thereof and the Final Report of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the respondent, S. Richard Arnold, a.k.a. Stuart Richard Arnold, Attorney Registration No. 0012733, last known address in Cincinnati, Ohio, be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that respondent be taxed the costs of these proceedings in the amount of $1,144.99, less the deposit of $500, for a total balance due of $644.99, which costs shall be payable to this court on or before ninety days from the date of this order, by certified check or money order. It is further ordered that if these costs are not paid in full on or before ninety days from the date of this order, interest at the rate of ten percent per annum shall accrue as of ninety days from the date of this order, on the balance of unpaid board costs. It is further ordered that if costs are not paid in full on or before ninety days from the date of this order, respondent may be found in contempt and may be suspended until costs, including any accrued interest, are paid in full.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.
For earlier case, see Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Arnold (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 294, 707 N.E.2d 1104.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.