Case Name: Mary E. McKenna, as Administratrix, etc., Appellant, v. The East River Ferry Company, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1889-04-16
Citations: 113 N.Y. 636
Docket Number: 
Parties: Mary E. McKenna, as Administratrix, etc., Appellant, v. The East River Ferry Company, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 113
Pages: 636–637

Head Matter:
Mary E. McKenna, as Administratrix, etc., Appellant, v. The East River Ferry Company, Respondent.
(Argued March 13, 1889;
decided April 16, 1889.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made May 9,. 1887, which affirmed a judgment, entered upon •an order dismissing the complaint, and affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Eugene Burlingame for appellant.
Nathan Bijur for respondent.

Opinion:
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except Ruger, Ch. J., Andrews and Danforth,. JJ., dissenting.
Judgment affirmed.