Case Name: Anthony R. BAKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-08-18
Citations: 622 So. 2d 193
Docket Number: No. 92-2082
Parties: Anthony R. BAKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and KLEIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 622
Pages: 193–194

Head Matter:
Anthony R. BAKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 92-2082.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Aug. 18, 1993.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Susan D. Cline, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Dawn S. Wynn, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a final judgment of conviction and sentence for violating a domestic violence injunction. At a hearing, the trial court pronounced appellant guilty of indirect criminal contempt. However, the final judgment does not contain a recital of the facts constituting the contempt, contrary to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.840(a)(6), nor were sufficient oral findings made at the hearing to satisfy the rule. Gidden v. State, 613 So.2d 457 (Fla.1993). Accordingly, the judgment and sentence are reversed and the cause remanded for entry of a corrected judgment and sentence.
ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and KLEIN, JJ., concur.