Case Name: Eulice GUEVARA-RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2006-07-07
Citations: 932 So. 2d 1227
Docket Number: No. 2D05-4110
Parties: Eulice GUEVARA-RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: DAVIS and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 932
Pages: 1227–1227

Head Matter:
Eulice GUEVARA-RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D05-4110.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
July 7, 2006.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Megan Olson, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Diana K. Bock, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

Opinion:
CANADY, Judge.
In this appeal briefed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Eulice Guevara-Rodriguez challenges her convictions and sentences for interference with child custody, giving a false name, having no valid vehicle registration, grand theft of a motor vehicle, possession .of drug paraphernalia, false imprisonment, and driving with a suspended license after prior violations. We affirm Guevara-Rodriguez's convictions without comment. We also affirm the sentences as imposed.
We write only to point out that the State's concession of error as to the imposition of the $3 teen court cost was erroneous. Guevara-Rodriguez failed to preserve that issue because she did not raise the matter at the sentencing hearing or file a motion to correct sentencing error pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b).
Affirmed.
DAVIS and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.