Case Name: Ewart Ulric VANDECRUIZE, a/k/a Ewart Vandercruize, Petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-07-08
Citations: 606 F. App'x 125
Docket Number: No. 15-1085
Parties: Ewart Ulric VANDECRUIZE, a/k/a Ewart Vandercruize, Petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before MOTZ, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 606
Pages: 125–126

Head Matter:
Ewart Ulric VANDECRUIZE, a/k/a Ewart Vandercruize, Petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 15-1085.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 30, 2015.
Decided: July 8, 2015.
Luis C. Diaz, Law Offices of Jay S. Marks, LLC, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Derek C. Julius, Senior Litigation Counsel, Benjamin Mark Moss, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Before MOTZ, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ewart Ulric Yandecruize, a native and citizen of Guyana, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("Board") denying his motion to reopen. We have reviewed the administrative record and Vandecruize's claims and find no abuse of discretion. See INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24, 112 S.Ct. 719, 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992) (setting forth standard of review). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Vandecruize (B.I.A. Dec. 22, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.