Case Name: Armene KAYE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-04-14
Citations: 95 F. App'x 151
Docket Number: No. 02-1854
Parties: Armene KAYE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 95
Pages: 151–152

Head Matter:
Armene KAYE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 02-1854.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
April 14, 2004.
Beth M. Rivers, Jeanne E. Mirer, Pitt, Dowty, McGehee, Mirer & Palmer, Royal Oak, MI, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Lawrence J. Murphy, Elizabeth Wells Skaggs, Varnum, Riddering, Schmidt & Howlett, Grand Rapids, MI, Richard D. Fries, Varnum, Riddering, Schmidt & Howlett, Kalamazoo, MI, for DefendantAppellee.
Before KENNEDY, DAUGHTREY and COLE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
OPINION
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff, Armene Kaye, appeals the District Court's grant of summary judgment in this employment discrimination action. Plaintiff contends that defendant, Daimler-Chrysler Corporation, violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Michigan's Elliot-Larsen Civil Rights Act by discriminating against her on the basis of her gender and retaliating against plaintiff for complaining to her supervisor by inappropriately transferring plaintiff to a previous job position.
After reviewing the briefs and the record in this case, we believe that the District Court's comprehensive and thorough opinion adequately addresses all of the issues plaintiff raises on appeal. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the District Court's grant of summary judgment based on the reasoning in the District Court's opinion.