Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Louis RIDDICK, a/k/a Fishman, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-10-19
Citations: 333 F. App'x 798
Docket Number: No. 09-6226
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. James Louis RIDDICK, a/k/a Fishman, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 333
Pages: 798–798

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. James Louis RIDDICK, a/k/a Fishman, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 09-6226.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 15, 2009.
Decided: Oct. 19, 2009.
James Louis Riddick, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James Louis Riddick appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Riddick, No. 2:95-cr-00014-BO-4 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 30, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.