Case Name: Joseph F. ADA; Felix P. Camacho, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. GOVERNMENT OF GUAM; Guam Election Commission, and its commissioners; Joseph F. Mesa, Commissioner; Joseph T. Duenas, Commissioner; Frederick J. Horecky, Commissioner; Douglas B. Moylan, Commissioner; Rosanna D. San Miguel, Commissioner; Leonila L.G. Herrero, Commissioner, Defendants, and Carl T.C. Gutierrez; Madeleine Z. Bordallo, Real Parties in Interest-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2000-03-06
Citations: 204 F.3d 1003
Docket Number: No. 98-17306
Parties: Joseph F. ADA; Felix P. Camacho, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. GOVERNMENT OF GUAM; Guam Election Commission, and its commissioners; Joseph F. Mesa, Commissioner; Joseph T. Duenas, Commissioner; Frederick J. Horecky, Commissioner; Douglas B. Moylan, Commissioner; Rosanna D. San Miguel, Commissioner; Leonila L.G. Herrero, Commissioner, Defendants, and Carl T.C. Gutierrez; Madeleine Z. Bordallo, Real Parties in Interest-Appellants.
Judges: Before: NOONAN and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI, Court of International Trade Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 204
Pages: 1003–1003

Head Matter:
Joseph F. ADA; Felix P. Camacho, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. GOVERNMENT OF GUAM; Guam Election Commission, and its commissioners; Joseph F. Mesa, Commissioner; Joseph T. Duenas, Commissioner; Frederick J. Horecky, Commissioner; Douglas B. Moylan, Commissioner; Rosanna D. San Miguel, Commissioner; Leonila L.G. Herrero, Commissioner, Defendants, and Carl T.C. Gutierrez; Madeleine Z. Bordallo, Real Parties in Interest-Appellants.
No. 98-17306.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
March 6, 2000.
Before: NOONAN and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI, Court of International Trade Judge.
The Honorable Jane A. Restani, Judge of the United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
The Supreme Court having reversed our decision, 179 F.3d 672 (9th Cir.1999), and remanded for proceedings consistent with its opinion, the order of the District Court of Guam is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court.