Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wendell Ray MULLIKEN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-12-16
Citations: 83 F. App'x 243
Docket Number: No. 03-30249; D.C. No. CR-94-00182-MJP
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Wendell Ray MULLIKEN, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 83
Pages: 243–243

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Wendell Ray MULLIKEN, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 03-30249.
D.C. No. CR-94-00182-MJP.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 8, 2003.
Decided Dec. 16, 2003.
U.S. Attorney, USSE-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee.
Michael Craig Nance, Law Office of Michael Nance, Seattle, WA, for Defendants Appellant.
Before GOODWIN, WALLACE and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Wendell Ray Mulliken appeals the judgment revoking his supervised release and imposing a 120-day prison sentence. We dismiss this appeal as moot because Mul-liken has completed serving his entire sentence, and thus lacks standing to raise any challenge to it. See United States v. Pa-lomba, 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir.1999) (citing Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 118 S.Ct. 978,140 L.Ed.2d 43 (1998)).
Accordingly, the motion of Michael Nance, Esq. to withdraw as counsel of record is GRANTED and the appeal is DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.