Case Name: Robert F. MUNSCH, M.D., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. James L. LEMON, John C. Lemon, and Lemon-Gonzalez, L.L.P., Defendants/Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-10-08
Citations: 97 S.W.3d 6
Docket Number: No. ED 80622
Parties: Robert F. MUNSCH, M.D., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. James L. LEMON, John C. Lemon, and Lemon-Gonzalez, L.L.P., Defendants/Respondents.
Judges: Before PAUL J. SIMON, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., J., and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 97
Pages: 6–6

Head Matter:
Robert F. MUNSCH, M.D., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. James L. LEMON, John C. Lemon, and Lemon-Gonzalez, L.L.P., Defendants/Respondents.
No. ED 80622.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Oct. 8, 2002.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 14, 2003.
Application for Transfer Denied March 4, 2003.
Before PAUL J. SIMON, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., J., and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff appeals from the trial court's entry of summary judgment in defendants' favor on plaintiffs claim for malicious prosecution. No error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).