Case Name: Howard MEREDITH, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. State of OREGON; Bruce A. Warner, Director of Oregon Department of Transportation; Jimmy L. Odom, Outdoor Advertising Technician, Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-04-18
Citations: 326 F.3d 1030
Docket Number: No. 01-35869
Parties: Howard MEREDITH, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. State of OREGON; Bruce A. Warner, Director of Oregon Department of Transportation; Jimmy L. Odom, Outdoor Advertising Technician, Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: Before: D.W. NELSON, THOMPSON and RICHARD A. PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 326
Pages: 1030–1030

Head Matter:
Howard MEREDITH, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. State of OREGON; Bruce A. Warner, Director of Oregon Department of Transportation; Jimmy L. Odom, Outdoor Advertising Technician, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 01-35869.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 1, 2002.
Filed Feb. 27, 2003.
Amended April 18, 2003.
Janet A. Metcalf, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Salem, OR, for the defendants-appellants.
Russell L. Baldwin, Lincoln City, OR, for the plaintiff-appellee.
Before: D.W. NELSON, THOMPSON and RICHARD A. PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
ORDER
The Opinion in this case, reported at 321 F.3d 807 (9th Cir.2003), is amended as follows:
1. Delete the paragraph on pages 815-16 that begins "We have held that we have jurisdiction ." and ends "Thomas v. Nakatani, 309 F.3d 1203, 1207-08 (9th Cir.2002)."
2. Delete the word "Similarly" in the first line of the first full paragraph on page 816 and replace it with the words "For instance."
It is further ordered that no petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc shall be filed in response to this order.