Case Name: Carl L. MULLINGS, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-06-12
Citations: 655 So. 2d 1305
Docket Number: No. 94-2785
Parties: Carl L. MULLINGS, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Appellees.
Judges: WOLF, WEBSTER and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 655
Pages: 1305–1305

Head Matter:
Carl L. MULLINGS, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Appellees.
No. 94-2785.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
June 12, 1995.
Carl L. Mullings, pro se.
No appearance for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, an inmate in the state prison system, seeks review of a final order summarily denying his petition for writ of mandamus. We conclude that the allegations contained in appellant's petition are sufficient to establish a prima facie case, and to shift the burden of going forward to appellees. Holcomb v. Department of Corrections, 609 So.2d 751 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). Accordingly, we reverse, and remand with directions that the trial court issue an alternative writ and conduct such further proceedings as may prove necessary.
REVERSED and REMANDED, with directions.
WOLF, WEBSTER and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.