Case Name: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Martin
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1994-06-22
Citations: 69 Ohio St. 3d 468
Docket Number: No. 94-492
Parties: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Martin.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 69
Pages: 468–470

Head Matter:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Martin.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Martin (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 468.]
(No. 94-492
Submitted April 19, 1994
Decided June 22, 1994.)
Geoffrey Stem, Disciplinary Counsel, and Sally Ann Steuk, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.
Charles W. Kettlewell, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We have reviewed the record and concur in the board's findings and recommendation, except for the proposed credit for respondent's interim suspension. Therefore, we find that Linda Sue Martin violated DR 1-102(A)(3) and (6), and she is hereby suspended from the practice of law for one year, with the last six months of that period to be stayed in favor of the probation period and conditions recommended by the board. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.