Case Name: Pere Marquette Railroad Company v. Donnelly; Same v. Swanson; Same v. Leslie; Same v. Bellasty; Same v. Locush; Same v. Baker; Same v. Grund; Same v. Martenson; Same v. Aho; Same v. Wonries; Same v. Phillips
Court: Appellate Court of Indiana
Jurisdiction: Indiana
Decision Date: 1905-06-30
Citations: 36 Ind. App. 705
Docket Number: No. 5,257; No. 5,258; No. 5,259; No. 5,260; No. 5,261; No. 5,262; No. 5,263; No. 5,264; No. 5,265; No. 5,266; No. 5,267
Parties: Pere Marquette Railroad Company v. Donnelly. Same v. Swanson. Same v. Leslie. Same v. Bellasty. Same v. Locush. Same v. Baker. Same v. Grund. Same v. Martenson. Same v. Aho. Same v. Wonries. Same v. Phillips.
Judges: 
Reporter: Indiana Court of Appeals Reports
Volume: 36
Pages: 705–706

Head Matter:
Pere Marquette Railroad Company v. Donnelly. Same v. Swanson. Same v. Leslie. Same v. Bellasty. Same v. Locush. Same v. Baker. Same v. Grund. Same v. Martenson. Same v. Aho. Same v. Wonries. Same v. Phillips.
[No. 5,257.] [No. 5,258.] [No. 5,259.] [No. 5,260.] [No. 5,261.] [No. 5,262.] [No. 5,263.] [No. 5,264.] [No. 5,265.] [No. 5,266.] [No. 5,267.
All filed June 30, 1905.
Rehearings denied November 2, 1905.]
From Laporte Superior Court; Harry B. Tuthill, Judge.
Suits against the Pere Marquette Railroad Company. From decrees against defendant it appeals.
Affirmed.
M. T. Krueger and James F. Gallaher, for appellant.
C. R. & J. B. Collins, for appellees.

Opinion:
Robinson, J.
The errors assigned and argued in the briefs of counsel in each of the preceding eleven eases are the same as those in Pere Maquette R. Co. v. Smith (1905), ante, 439, and upon the authority of that case and the case of Pare Marquette R. Co. v. Baertz (1905), ante, 439, the judgment of the trial court in each of said cases is affirmed.