Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michel WITHERS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-12-16
Citations: 83 F. App'x 238
Docket Number: No. 03-50136; D.C. No. CR-97-01085-R-01
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michel WITHERS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 83
Pages: 238–239

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michel WITHERS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 03-50136.
D.C. No. CR-97-01085-R-01.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 8, 2003.
Decided Dec. 16, 2003.
Ronald L. Cheng, Christopher M. Bran-win, USLA-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Michel Withers, pro se, Adelanto, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before GOODWIN, WALLACE, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Federal prisoner Michel Withers appeals pro se the denial of his motion for production of wiretap orders and affidavits. We lack jurisdiction to review this non-appealable order. Cf. 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.