Case Name: Claude Horsford et al., Respondents, v. Yvonne Bacott, Appellant, and "John Doe" et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2007-02-22
Citations: 8 N.Y.3d 874
Docket Number: 
Parties: Claude Horsford et al., Respondents, v Yvonne Bacott, Appellant, and “John Doe” et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 8
Pages: 874–875

Head Matter:
[864 NE2d 615, 832 NYS2d 485]
Claude Horsford et al., Respondents, v Yvonne Bacott, Appellant, and “John Doe” et al., Respondents.
Decided February 22, 2007
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Legal Aid Society, New York City {Alan Canner and Afua Atta-Mensah of counsel), for appellant.
Gary J. Wachtel, New York City, for Claude Horsford and another, respondents.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and certified question answered in the affirmative. The Appellate Division correctly concluded that the factual determination on which the Civil Court judgment was based is supported by sufficient evidence.
Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.