Case Name: P. Vincent Nee et al., Appellants, v. New York State Community Housing and Renewal Agency et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1977-03-21
Citations: 56 A.D.2d 904
Docket Number: 
Parties: P. Vincent Nee et al., Appellants, v New York State Community Housing and Renewal Agency et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 56
Pages: 904–904

Head Matter:
P. Vincent Nee et al., Appellants, v New York State Community Housing and Renewal Agency et al., Respondents.

Opinion:
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review two determinations of the respondent New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (sued herein as the New York State Community Housing and Renewal Agency) which, after a hearing, granted rent increases to the respondent housing companies, petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered December 23, 1976, which dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Special Term correctly dismissed the petition. Whether viewed under the substantial evidence or the arbitrary and capricious test, the determinations made were proper (see Matter of Fuller v Urstadt, 28 NY2d 315; Matter of Sullo [Goodwin], NYU, June 25, 1976, p 5, col 6). Margett, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Titone and O'Connor, JJ., concur.