Case Name: Dorothy S. TOWNE, Esquire, d/b/a Dottie Towne, Attorney at Law, and David Webster, Appellants, v. VAKA LAW GROUP, P.L., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2017-02-22
Citations: 216 So. 3d 674
Docket Number: Case No. 2D16-3171
Parties: Dorothy S. TOWNE, Esquire, d/b/a Dottie Towne, Attorney at Law, and David Webster, Appellants, v. VAKA LAW GROUP, P.L., Appellee.
Judges: KELLY and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 216
Pages: 674–674

Head Matter:
Dorothy S. TOWNE, Esquire, d/b/a Dottie Towne, Attorney at Law, and David Webster, Appellants, v. VAKA LAW GROUP, P.L., Appellee.
Case No. 2D16-3171
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Opinion filed February 22, 2017
Dottie Towne, Tampa, for Appellants.
John V. Trujillo, Jr., Tampa, for Appel-lee.

Opinion:
VILLANTI, Chief Judge.
Dorothy Towne and David Webster appeal various orders underlying a default judgment of liability entered in favor of Vaka Law Group, P.L., in an action for breach of contract arising from a retention agreement. We have jurisdiction over the order denying Appellants' motion for order compelling arbitration and motion to stay judicial proceedings pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(C)(iv). Because Towne waived her right to arbitration, we affirm the order denying her motion to stay and compel arbitration. We also affirm the order denying Webster's motion to stay and compel arbitration.
Appellants also seek review of various other orders entered prior to the order denying their motion to stay and compel arbitration. To the extent that Towne seeks review of the denial of her motion for judgment on the pleadings, we must dismiss the appeal as we do not have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.130; Zaremba v. Harbison, 462 So.2d 80, 81 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). To the extent that Towne seeks review of the denial of her motion to vacate the default judgment of liability, we must also dismiss the appeal as we do not have jurisdiction. See Bryant v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 182 So.3d 927, 929-30 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016). Finally, to the extent that Towne seeks review of the issuance of the clerk's default, we affirm because the propriety of that default has not been preserved for review. See Shelden v. Shelden, 63 So.3d 78, 81 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011).
Affirmed in part; dismissed in part.
KELLY and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.
. We are not convinced that Webster was a proper party to the action below, and as such, a proper party to this appeal. However, because we affirm, we do not reach this issue.