Case Name: Shawn D. MOORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-04-17
Citations: 46 S.W.3d 583
Docket Number: No. ED 78114
Parties: Shawn D. MOORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J., CRAHAN and DRAPER JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 46
Pages: 583–583

Head Matter:
Shawn D. MOORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 78114.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
April 17, 2001.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied June 5, 2001.
Lisa M. Stroup, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Stephanie Morrell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J., CRAHAN and DRAPER JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURLAM.
Appellant Shawn Moore ("Movant") appeals the judgment denying, after an evi-dentiary hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct the judgment or sentence. Movant asserts the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion as he was deprived of his constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel.
The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties, however, have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).