Case Name: J. H. CLARK and Wife, M. J. CLARK, v. C. A. BROADWAY
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 1922-06-02
Citations: 183 N.C. 680
Docket Number: 
Parties: J. H. CLARK and Wife, M. J. CLARK, v. C. A. BROADWAY.
Judges: 
Reporter: North Carolina Reports
Volume: 183
Pages: 680–681

Head Matter:
J. H. CLARK and Wife, M. J. CLARK, v. C. A. BROADWAY.
(Filed 2 June, 1922.)
Appeal by defendant from Daniels, J., at November Term, 1921, of LeNOIR, in an action to determine the true location of the boundary line between the lands of plaintiffs and the defendant.
From a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiffs, the defendant appealed.
Moore & Groom, and Gowper, Whitaker & Allen for plaintiffs.
Bouse & Bouse for defendant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This was a proceeding by adjacent landowners to settle a dispute as to the true location of the dividing line between their -respective properties. The land claimed by the feme plaintiff is known as a part of the Council Hooten lands, and the land claimed by the defendant is known as the Jesse "W. Broadway land. Both tracts are located in Oontentnea Neck Township, Lenoir County.
J. W. Grainger purchased the Hooten lands in 1891 and conveyed same to feme plaintiff in 1900. The same J. W. Grainger purchased the 'Broadway land in 1890, and conveyed this land to defendant's predecessor in title in the year 1903.
Counsel on both sides have filed interesting and elaborate briefs •, but, .as we view the contentions of the parties, the case seems to have been tried in substantial conformity to the law 'appertaining to the facts, and -we have found no ruling or action on the part of the learned judge which would warrant a reversal or an order for a new trial. The verdict and .judgment will be upheld.
No error.