Case Name: Robert Lee ALEXANDER, Plaintiff in Error, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Defendant in Error
Court: Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1968-09-04
Citations: 444 P.2d 855
Docket Number: No. A-14467
Parties: Robert Lee ALEXANDER, Plaintiff in Error, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Defendant in Error.
Judges: NIX, P. J., and BRETT, J., concur.
Reporter: Pacific Reporter 2d
Volume: 444
Pages: 855–856

Head Matter:
Robert Lee ALEXANDER, Plaintiff in Error, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Defendant in Error.
No. A-14467.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.
Sept. 4, 1968.
Dennis L. Pope, Enid, for plaintiff in error.
G. T. Blankenship, Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.

Opinion:
BUSSEY, Judge.
Robert Lee Alexander was charged, tried, and convicted in the District Court of Garfield County for the crime of Grand Larceny, and his punishment fixed at three years in the penitentiary at McAlester, Oklahoma. From that judgment and sentence he has appealed to this Court.
This cause was lodged in this Court on October 12, 1967. Brief was due to be filed by November 12, 1967; however, no brief was filed, nor an extension of time in which to file a brief requested. Therefore, on December 28, 1967, by order of this Court, the cause was summarily submitted for opinion in accordance with Rules Six and Nine of this Court.
This Court has repeatedly held that where the defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction and no briefs are filed in support of the petition in error, this Court will examine the records only for fundamental error. If none appears of record, the judgment will be affirmed. See McVicker v. State, Okl.Cr., 437 P.2d 457.
This Court has carefully examined the record and reviewed the testimony in the instant case and finds no fundamental error. The record discloses that the defendant was afforded a fair and impartial trial and the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict of the jury. There being no apparent error in the record on appeal, it is the opinion of this Court that the judgment and sentence be affirmed.
NIX, P. J., and BRETT, J., concur.