Case Name: Donald WICKERHAM, Claimant/Appellant, v. INTEGRAM-ST. LOUIS SEATING, INC., Employer, and Manpower, Inc., Employer/Respondent, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri, as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Additional Party
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-01-21
Citations: 94 S.W.3d 446
Docket Number: No. ED 81004
Parties: Donald WICKERHAM, Claimant/Appellant, v. INTEGRAM-ST. LOUIS SEATING, INC., Employer, and Manpower, Inc., Employer/Respondent, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri, as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Additional Party.
Judges: Before PAUL J. SIMON, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., J. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 94
Pages: 446–447

Head Matter:
Donald WICKERHAM, Claimant/Appellant, v. INTEGRAM-ST. LOUIS SEATING, INC., Employer, and Manpower, Inc., Employer/Respondent, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri, as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Additional Party.
No. ED 81004.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Jan. 21, 2003.
C. Marshall Friedman, Kenneth E. Rudd, Thomas P. McDermott, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Christopher T. Archer, Archer & Associates, L.L.C., St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Mary Jennifer Sommers, St. Louis, MO, for additional party. ■
Before PAUL J. SIMON, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., J. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Claimant appeals from the Temporary or Partial Award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, finding his previous employer not liable for paying compensation. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. No error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished, for their information only, with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).