Case Name: Commonwealth v. Dugan, Appellant et al.
Court: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1950-07-20
Citations: 167 Pa. Super. 22
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 64
Parties: Commonwealth v. Dugan, Appellant et al.
Judges: Before Rhodes, P. J., Hirt, Reno, Dithrich, Ross and Arnold, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania Superior Court Reports
Volume: 167
Pages: 22–22

Head Matter:
Commonwealth v. Dugan, Appellant et al.
Argued April 10, 1950.
Before Rhodes, P. J., Hirt, Reno, Dithrich, Ross and Arnold, JJ.
N. J. IÁppard and U. G. Yogan, for appellant, submitted a brief.
Marjorie H. Matson, Assistant District Attorney, with her William S. Rahauser, District Attorney and Samuel Strauss, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.
July 20 1950:

Opinion:
Per Curiam,
Appellant Dugan was convicted of the same offense and in the same trial as Flaherty, whose appeal has been disposed of in an opinion filed this day. Dugan raises the same questions which have been completely answered in the Flaherty opinion. A separate opinion is unnecessary.
Judgment and sentence affirmed.