Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marsha KING, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-02-03
Citations: 675 F. App'x 355
Docket Number: No. 16-7318
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marsha KING, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 675
Pages: 355–356

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marsha KING, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-7318
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: January 31, 2017
Decided: February 3, 2017
Marsha King, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Westley Haynie, Assistant United States Attorney, Joseph Kosky, Office of the United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Marsha King appeals the district court's orders denying her "Motion To Stay Restitution Until Release From Incarceration and To Set Schedule Payments for Assessment Fine" and her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. King, No. 2:14-cr-00065-RAJ-DEM-1 (E.D. Va. Sept. 6 & Sept. 15, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED