Case Name: SARAH DILKS, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. ORLANDO KELSEY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1906-06-18
Citations: 73 N.J.L. 678
Docket Number: 
Parties: SARAH DILKS, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. ORLANDO KELSEY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Judges: For affirmance — The Chancellor, Fort, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Greeij, Gray. 10.
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 73
Pages: 678–678

Head Matter:
SARAH DILKS, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. ORLANDO KELSEY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Argued November 27, 1905
Decided June 18, 1906.
On error to the- Supreme Court.
For the plaintiff in error, Timothy J. Middleton and John J. Crandall.
For the defendant in error, Watkins & Avis.

Opinion:
Per Cueiam.
The judgment of the Supreme Court, affirming the judgment of the Circuit Court, in proceedings under the Landlord and Tenant act, is now affirmed on the grounds stated in the per curiam memorandum filed in the Supreme Court, and reported in 59 Atl. Rep. 897.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Fort, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Greeij, Gray. 10.
For reversal. — None.