Case Name: 116th Street Realty Partnership, Appellant, v. City of New York, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2005-05-05
Citations: 18 A.D.3d 226
Docket Number: 
Parties: 116th Street Realty Partnership, Appellant, v City of New York, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 18
Pages: 226–227

Head Matter:
116th Street Realty Partnership, Appellant, v City of New York, Respondent.
[794 NYS2d 368]

Opinion:
Determination of the New York City Tax Appeals Tribunal, dated September 15, 2003, which affirmed the denial of petitioner's motion to vacate the dismissal of its challenge to a real property tax assessment, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding dismissed, without costs.
Petitioner's arguments are for the most part improperly raised for the first time in the instant CPLR article 78 proceeding, and we decline to address them (see e.g. Matter of Frangos v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 10 AD3d 562 [2004], lv dismissed 4 NY3d 759 [2005]). The denial of vacatur was not an abuse of discretion in view of petitioner's multiple deviations from the clear instructions provided by the agency, including that it provide an excuse for its default at the administrative law judge level (see generally Time Warner City Cable v Tri State Auto, 5 AD3d 153 [2004], lv dismissed 3 NY3d 656 [2004]). Concur—Buckley, P.J., Saxe, Nardelli, Williams and Catterson, JJ.