Case Name: Harry Rothstein, Appellant, v. W. T. Grant Company, Respondent-Appellant, and Arthur R. Hackman et al., Copartners Doing Business as Hackart Construction Co., Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1958-05-26
Citations: 6 A.D.2d 722
Docket Number: 
Parties: Harry Rothstein, Appellant, v. W. T. Grant Company, Respondent-Appellant, and Arthur R. Hackman et al., Copartners Doing Business as Hackart Construction Co., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 6
Pages: 722–722

Head Matter:
Harry Rothstein, Appellant, v. W. T. Grant Company, Respondent-Appellant, and Arthur R. Hackman et al., Copartners Doing Business as Hackart Construction Co., Respondent.

Opinion:
In an action by an employee of a subcontractor engaged in the alteration of a building against the lessee of said building and the general contractor, the lessee served a cross complaint for judgment over against the general contractor, alleging active negligence. At the close of the entire ease, the court dismissed the complaint and the cross complaint. The employee appeals from so much of the judgment entered thereon and from so much of the amended judgment as dismissed the complaint, and the lessee appeals from so much of said amended judgment as dismissed its cross complaint. Amended judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Appeal from original judgment dismissed, without costs. Present — Wenzel, Acting P. J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.