Case Name: William O'BRIEN, Appellant, v. Michael BUDDECKE, et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-11-17
Citations: 608 So. 2d 542
Docket Number: Nos. 91-2633, 91-2877
Parties: William O’BRIEN, Appellant, v. Michael BUDDECKE, et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and GODERICH, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 608
Pages: 542–542

Head Matter:
William O’BRIEN, Appellant, v. Michael BUDDECKE, et al., Appellees.
Nos. 91-2633, 91-2877.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 17, 1992.
Perse & Ginsberg and Ed Perse, Ratiner & Glinn, Miami, for appellant.
Arthur J. Morburger, Weinstein, Bavly & Moon, Miami, for appellees.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and GODERICH, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Holmes v. Redland Constr. Co., 557 So.2d 911 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Kinya v. Lifter, Inc., 489 So.2d 92 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 496 So.2d 142 (Fla. 1986); Barth v. Florida State Constr. Serv., Inc., 363 So.2d 199 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), cert. denied, 368 So.2d 1362 (Fla. 1979).