Case Name: Walter KNIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-02-21
Citations: 593 So. 2d 1202
Docket Number: Nos. 90-02161, 90-03576
Parties: Walter KNIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SCHOONOVER, C.J., and FRANK and PARKER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 593
Pages: 1202–1202

Head Matter:
Walter KNIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Nos. 90-02161, 90-03576.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Feb. 21, 1992.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Deborah K. Brueckheimer, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Marc E. Brandes, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, and Sue R. Henderson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Walter Knight raises three sentencing issues in this appeal. Only one has merit. We strike the condition of probation imposed by the trial court that Knight show respect to officers connected with the criminal justice system. We conclude that condition is too vague to inform Knight of what conduct is acceptable or unacceptable. Further, because that condition of probation had not been orally pronounced by the trial court, it is not properly a part of the sentence. See Muro v. State, 589 So.2d 1048 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).
SCHOONOVER, C.J., and FRANK and PARKER, JJ., concur.