Case Name: In Re: Kodilinye Ogonna OJUKWU, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-02-16
Citations: 365 F. App'x 470
Docket Number: No. 09-2168
Parties: In Re: Kodilinye Ogonna OJUKWU, Petitioner.
Judges: Before MICHAEL, DUNCAN, and , DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 365
Pages: 470–470

Head Matter:
In Re: Kodilinye Ogonna OJUKWU, Petitioner.
No. 09-2168.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 8, 2010.
Decided: Feb. 16, 2010.
Kodilinye Ogonna Ojukwu, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before MICHAEL, DUNCAN, and , DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Petition dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kodilinye Ogonna Ojukwu has filed a petition for an original writ of habeas corpus challenging his ongoing detention and raising Fourth Amendment search and seizure issues related to his ongoing criminal trial in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland.
Because Ojukwu is not currently incarcerated within the Fourth Circuit, we lack jurisdiction to entertain the petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241(a) (2006) (providing that a § 2241 petition must be filed in the district or circuit of incarceration); In re Jones, 226 F.3d 328, 332 (4th Cir.2000). Moreover, because the issues that Ojukwu seeks to raise may be adequately addressed through pretrial motions at his criminal trial, we find that it would not serve the interest of justice to transfer the petition to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. See 28 U.S.C. § 1631 (2006). We therefore deny the motion for leavé to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DISMISSED.