Case Name: Pearlena HARRIS, Donald Perry and Marlowe Davis, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. The CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Freeman Bosley, Jr., William C. Duffe and Ronald Smith, Defendants/Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1997-06-10
Citations: 946 S.W.2d 765
Docket Number: No. 71372
Parties: Pearlena HARRIS, Donald Perry and Marlowe Davis, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. The CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Freeman Bosley, Jr., William C. Duffe and Ronald Smith, Defendants/Respondents.
Judges: Before CRAHAN, P.J., and GRIMM and HOFF, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 946
Pages: 765–766

Head Matter:
Pearlena HARRIS, Donald Perry and Marlowe Davis, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. The CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Freeman Bosley, Jr., William C. Duffe and Ronald Smith, Defendants/Respondents.
No. 71372.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
June 10, 1997.
Robert K. Sweeney, Brian A. Speetor, St. Louis, for plaintiffs/appellants.
Jacqueline Davis, Tyrone A. Tabora, Edward James Hanlon, St. Louis, for defendants/respondents.
Before CRAHAN, P.J., and GRIMM and HOFF, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellants, Building Inspectors and Building Inspector Supervisors of the Building Division of the City of St. Louis, appeal the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis upholding the pay classifications set forth in Ordinance No. 62657. Appellants claim that Sections 1 and 2 of the ordinance as they relate to Appellants violate Article XVIII § 2(b) of the Charter of the City of St. Louis. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An opinion reciting the facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. We affirm in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).