Case Name: STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. BENJAMIN MORRIS, Defendant
Court: Montana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Montana
Decision Date: 2007-02-23
Citations: 340 Mont. 20
Docket Number: Cause No. DC-06-160C
Parties: STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. BENJAMIN MORRIS, Defendant,
Judges: Chairperson, Hon. Randal I. Spaulding, Member, Hon. Katherine Irigoin and Member, Hon. Stewart Stadler.
Reporter: Montana Reports
Volume: 340
Pages: 20–20

Head Matter:
Done in open Court this 8th day of February, 2007.
DATED this 23rd day of February, 2007.
STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. BENJAMIN MORRIS, Defendant,
Cause No. DC-06-160C
DECISION

Opinion:
On October 4, 2006, the defendant was sentenced to the following: Count I: Five (5) years in the Montana State Prison for the offense of Criminal Possession of Dangerous Drugs, a felony; and Count II: A commitment to the Gallatin County Detention Center for a term of six (6) months for the offense of Criminal Possession of Drug Paraphernalia, a misdemeanor. Counts I & II shall run concurrently with each other, with the sentence imposed in Cause No. DC-06-184C, and with any other sentence previously imposed.
On February 8, 2007, the defendant's application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
The defendant was present and was represented by Eric Olson. The state was not represented.
Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.
Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that "the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive." (§46-18-904(3), MCA).
The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.
Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.
Chairperson, Hon. Randal I. Spaulding, Member, Hon. Katherine Irigoin and Member, Hon. Stewart Stadler.