Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pedro MARTINEZ-PATRICIO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-06-03
Citations: 64 F. App'x 406
Docket Number: No. 02-7652
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pedro MARTINEZ-PATRICIO, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 64
Pages: 406–406

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pedro MARTINEZ-PATRICIO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-7652.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 29, 2003.
Decided June 3, 2003.
Pedro Martinez-Patricio, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Hale Levin, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Pedro Martinez-Patricio seeks to appeal the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's report and recommendation and denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Martinez-Patricio has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.