Case Name: Illinois Union Insurance Company, Respondent, v. Assurance Company of America, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2012-06-28
Citations: 19 N.Y.3d 942
Docket Number: 
Parties: Illinois Union Insurance Company, Respondent, v Assurance Company of America, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 19
Pages: 942–943

Head Matter:
[973 NE2d 1289, 950 NYS2d 515]
Illinois Union Insurance Company, Respondent, v Assurance Company of America, Appellant.
Decided June 28, 2012
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Coughlin Duffy LLP, New York City (Robert W. Muilenburg and Steven D. Cantarutti of counsel), for appellant.
Hodgson Russ LLP, Buffalo (Kevin D. Szczepanski and Lisa Bauer of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be modified, without costs, by granting judgment declaring in accordance with this memorandum and, as so modified, affirmed. The certified question should be answered in the negative.
In this insurance coverage dispute, to which California law applies, plaintiff Illinois Union Insurance Company had a duty to defend the insured in the underlying action because Illinois Union did not "eliminate the possibility that the insured's conduct falls within the coverage of the policy" (Montrose Chem. Corp. v Superior Ct., 6 Cal 4th 287, 301, 861 P2d 1153, 1161 [1993]). Under the circumstances of this case, however, we agree with Illinois Union that pursuant to equitable contribution principles, it is entitled to reimbursement from defendant Assurance Company of America for an equal share of the costs associated with Illinois Union's defense of the claims in the underlying action.
Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Grappeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur in memorandum.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order modified, etc.