Case Name: NANCY STRUMPH, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. SCHERING CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1993-07-13
Citations: 133 N.J. 33
Docket Number: 
Parties: NANCY STRUMPH, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. SCHERING CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 133
Pages: 33–35

Head Matter:
626 A.2d 1090
NANCY STRUMPH, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. SCHERING CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Argued March 2, 1993
Decided July 13, 1993.
Russell L. Hewit argued the cause for appellant (Dughi and Hewit, attorneys; Mr. Hewit, Christopher J. Christie, and Mary Elizabeth Gazi, on the briefs).
Earl G. Kauffman, a member of the Pennsylvania bar, argued the cause for respondent (Jack E. Milkis, attorney; Mr. Kauffman and Mr. Milkis, on the brief).
John B. Kearney submitted a brief on behalf of amicus curiae Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association (Kenney & Kearney, attorneys).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is reversed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Skillman's dissenting opinion for the Appellate Division, reported at 256 N.J.Super. 309, 323, 606 A.2d 1140 (1992).