Case Name: Donna M. Bruheim, Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner, v. David J. Little, William J. Broesch, Joyce E. Broesch, American Family Mutual Insurance Company of Wisconsin, Earl Conner, and American Standard Insurance Company of Wisconsin, Defendants-Respondents
Court: Wisconsin Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Wisconsin
Decision Date: 1981-06-30
Citations: 103 Wis. 2d 96
Docket Number: No. 79-1607
Parties: Donna M. Bruheim, Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner, v. David J. Little, William J. Broesch, Joyce E. Broesch, American Family Mutual Insurance Company of Wisconsin, Earl Conner, and American Standard Insurance Company of Wisconsin, Defendants-Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Wisconsin Reports Second
Volume: 103
Pages: 96–97

Head Matter:
Donna M. Bruheim, Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner, v. David J. Little, William J. Broesch, Joyce E. Broesch, American Family Mutual Insurance Company of Wisconsin, Earl Conner, and American Standard Insurance Company of Wisconsin, Defendants-Respondents.
Supreme Court
No. 79-1607.
Argued May 1, 1981. —
Decided June 30, 1981.
(Also reported in 307 N.W.2d 276.)
For the petitioner there were briefs and oral argument by Richard A. Heilprin of Madison.
For David J. Little and American Standard Insurance Company of Wisconsin there was a brief by Scott G. Pernitz, John D. Winner and Winner, McCallum, Hendee & Wixson of Madison, and oral argument by Mr. Pernitz.
For American Family Mutual Insurance Company, American Standard Insurance Company of Wisconsin and Earl Conner, there was a brief by John ÉL. Moore, Thomas A. Lockyear and Bell, Metzner & Gierhart, S.C., of Madison, and oral argument by Mr. Moore.
Amicus curiae brief was filed by Eugene 0. Gehl, Bruce A. Schultz and Brynelson, Herrick, Gehl & Bu-caida of Madison, for Wisconsin Insurance Alliance.

Opinion:
WILLIAM G. CALLOW, J.
The issue presented on this review is identical to that presented in Kranzush v. Badger State Mutual Casualty Co., 103 Wis. 2d 56, 307 N.W.2d 256 (1981). That issue is whether a third-party-claimant's complaint, alleging bad faith on the part of the tort-feasor's insurer in failing to negotiate and settle her claim, states a claim upon which relief can be granted. The circuit court for Sauk' county, Hon. James R. Seer-ing presiding, granted the' defendants' motion to dismiss the bad-faith count for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The. court of appeals affirmed .the dismissal, holding that an insurer's settlement practices do not give rise to a bad-faith action in favor of a third-party claimant. Bruheim v. Little, 98 Wis.2d 178, 295 N.W.2d 793 (Ct. App. 1980).
The resolution of this case is controlled by our decision in Kranzush, and in view of our holding in that case, we affirm.
By the Court, — The decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.