Case Name: ST. LOUIS TIN & SHEET METAL WORKING CO. v. THE UNITED STATES
Court: United States Court of Claims
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1926-05-24
Citations: 62 Ct. Cl. 277
Docket Number: No. B-185
Parties: ST. LOUIS TIN & SHEET METAL WORKING CO. v. THE UNITED STATES
Judges: Graham, Judge; Booth, Judge; and Campbell, Chief Justice, concur.
Reporter: United States Court of Claims Reports
Volume: 62
Pages: 277–281

Head Matter:
ST. LOUIS TIN & SHEET METAL WORKING CO. v. THE UNITED STATES
[No. B-185.
Decided May 24, 1926]
Mr. M. Walton Hendry for the plaintiff.
Mr. Edwin S. McCrary, with whom was Mr. Assistant Attorney General Herman J. Galloway, for the defendant.

Opinion:
Hat, Juclge,
delivered the opinion of the court:
This case arises under the Dent Act, 40 Stat. 1272, and is for the amount of $13,581.47 by reason of an agreement alleged to have been entered into between the plaintiff and the United States.
In the first place it does not appear that the officer of the United States who is alleged to have made the contract had any authority to contract on the part of the United States, or to incur any liability on the part of the Government for or on account of the bread tins or the materials for their manufacture.
Under the decision in Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. v. United States, 261 U. S. 592, the plaintiff has no right to recover.
The evidence shows that the materials were used by the plaintiff in its commercial business, and if there was any loss suffered by the plaintiff it is not shown what the loss was.
The petition of the plaintiff must be dismissed. It is so ordered.
Graham, Judge; Booth, Judge; and Campbell, Chief Justice, concur.