Case Name: ARMOUR & COMPANY, RESPONDENT, v. MAYOR AND ALDERMEN OF JERSEY CITY ET AL., APPELLANTS
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1928-02-06
Citations: 104 N.J.L. 432
Docket Number: 
Parties: ARMOUR & COMPANY, RESPONDENT, v. MAYOR AND ALDERMEN OF JERSEY CITY ET AL., APPELLANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 104
Pages: 432–432

Head Matter:
ARMOUR & COMPANY, RESPONDENT, v. MAYOR AND ALDERMEN OF JERSEY CITY ET AL., APPELLANTS.
Argued October 31, 1927
Decided February 6, 1928.
For the respondent, John Milton.'
For the appellants, Thomas J. Brogan.

Opinion:
Pee Cueiam;.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Teenchabd, Mintubn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbaci-i, Lloyd, White, Van Buskiek, McG-lennon, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, JJ. 13.
.For reversal — None.