Case Name: Edna V. Cavanaugh vs. The Connecticut Company
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1930-03-03
Citations: 110 Conn. 698
Docket Number: 
Parties: Edna V. Cavanaugh vs. The Connecticut Company.
Judges: Wheeler, C. J., Maltbie, Haines, Hinman and Banks, Js.
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 110
Pages: 698–698

Head Matter:
Edna V. Cavanaugh vs. The Connecticut Company.
Third Judicial District, Bridgeport,
October Term, 1929.
Wheeler, C. J., Maltbie, Haines, Hinman and Banks, Js.
Argued October 31st, 1929
decided March 3d, 1930.
Israel J. Cohn, for the appellant (plaintiff).
Seth W. Baldwin, for the appellee (defendant).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We cannot hold upon the evidence under the rule announced in Rosenthal v. New York, N. H. & H. R. Co., 88 Conn. 65, 89 Atl. 888, as amplified, explained and followed in Belledeau v. Connecticut Co., ante, p. 625, 149 Atl. 127, that the trial court erred in setting-aside the verdict.'
'There is no error.