Case Name: ERIC MICHAEL AKERS, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1994-02-02
Citations: 126 Or. App. 265
Docket Number: CA A68021
Parties: ERIC MICHAEL AKERS, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent.
Judges: Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds, Judge, and Durham, Judge pro tempore.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 126
Pages: 265–266

Head Matter:
Submitted on record and briefs December 23, 1993,
affirmed February 2, 1994
ERIC MICHAEL AKERS, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent.
(CA A68021)
866 P2d 527
Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, and Lawrence J. Hall, Deputy Public Defender, filed the brief for petitioner.
Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Harrison Latto, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds, Judge, and Durham, Judge pro tempore.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision that imposed as a condition of parole that he not have contact with a particular person. He asserts that there is not substantial evidence to support imposition of the condition. We have reviewed the record, including evidence not disclosed to petitioner, and conclude that there is evidence justifying the imposition of the condition. He also challenges the refusal of the Board to disclose to him a letter it considered in imposing the condition. The withholding of the letter was not error. Flowers v. Board of Parole, 124 Or App 331, 862 P2d 1312 (1993).
Affirmed.