Case Name: Jeremy CLEVELAND, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-09-04
Citations: 377 S.W.3d 611
Docket Number: No. ED 96830
Parties: Jeremy CLEVELAND, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., C.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 377
Pages: 611–611

Head Matter:
Jeremy CLEVELAND, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 96830.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Sept. 4, 2012.
Jo Ann Rotermund, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Todd T. Smith, LLM, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., C.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Jeremy Cleveland appeals from the motion court's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Judgment (judgment) denying his Rule 24.035 Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence and Request for Evidentiary Hearing, alleging ineffective assistance of his plea counsel. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).