Case Name: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MATTHEW LANISH, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1969-06-02
Citations: 54 N.J. 93
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MATTHEW LANISH, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 54
Pages: 93–93

Head Matter:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MATTHEW LANISH, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Argued May 9, 1969
Decided June 2, 1969.
Mr. Remo M. Groce, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General, attorney).
Mr. Victor Friedman argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Louis A. Smith on the brief).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Sullivan in the Appellate Division, 103 N. J. Super. 441.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Haneman. — 7.
For reversal — None.