Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Derrick Lamar WARREN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-05-30
Citations: 10 F. App'x 577
Docket Number: No. 00-10318; D.C. No. CR-99-40254-DLJ
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Derrick Lamar WARREN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before PREGERSON, FERNANDEZ, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 10
Pages: 577–578

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Derrick Lamar WARREN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 00-10318.
D.C. No. CR-99-40254-DLJ.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 14, 2001.
Decided May 30, 2001.
Before PREGERSON, FERNANDEZ, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Derrick Lamar Warren appeals his guilty plea conviction for one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Warren contends that 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) is unconstitutional under the Commerce Clause in light of United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549, 115 S.Ct. 1624, 131 L.Ed.2d 626 (1995), United States v. Morrison, 529 U.S. 598, 120 S.Ct. 1740, 146 L.Ed.2d 658 (2000), and Jones v. United States, 529 U.S. 848, 120 S.Ct. 1904, 146 L.Ed.2d 902 (2000). As Warren concedes, however, this court's rejection of that ar gument in United States v. Jones, 231 F.3d 508, 514-15 (9th Cir.2000) is dispositive.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
. Warren's request for an initial hearing en banc is denied as untimely. See Fed. R.App. P. 35(c).