Case Name: DOHERTY et al, Petitioners, v. OREGON WATER RESOURCES DIRECTOR et al, Respondents
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1988-10-12
Citations: 93 Or. App. 352
Docket Number: CA A40087
Parties: DOHERTY et al, Petitioners, v. OREGON WATER RESOURCES DIRECTOR et al, Respondents.
Judges: Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Warren and Rossman, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 93
Pages: 352–354

Head Matter:
On petitioners’ petition for reconsideration filed August 10,
reconsideration allowed, former opinion (92 Or App 22, 758 P2d 865) clarified and adhered to October 12, 1988
DOHERTY et al, Petitioners, v. OREGON WATER RESOURCES DIRECTOR et al, Respondents.
(CA A40087)
762 P2d 330
Argued and submitted June 12,1987.
William F. Schroeder and Larry A. Sullivan, Vale, for petition.
No appearance contra.
Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Warren and Rossman, Judges.
BUTTLER, P. J.

Opinion:
BUTTLER, P. J.
On petitioners' petition for review of our decision, 92 Or App 22, 758 P2d 865 (1988), we allow reconsideration, ORAP 10.10, and write for the purpose of clarifying the basis for affirming that the Director's decision establishing the Butter Creek critical ground water area and six subareas. We add only that, whether or not we agree with it, the Director's decision is supported by substantial evidence on the whole record. ORS 183.482(8) (c); Younger v. City of Portland, 305 Or 346, 752 P2d 262 (1988).
Reconsideration allowed; former opinion clarified and adhered to.