Case Name: Ricky SWEET, Appellant, v. Alicia Monique TUCKER, Appellee.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2019-01-07
Citations: 260 So. 3d 1191
Docket Number: No. 1D18-356
Parties: Ricky SWEET, Appellant,
v.
Alicia Monique TUCKER, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 260
Pages: 1191–1191

Head Matter:
Ricky SWEET, Appellant,
v.
Alicia Monique TUCKER, Appellee.
No. 1D18-356
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
January 7, 2019
Ricky Sweet, pro se, Appellant.
No appearance for Appellee.

Opinion:
B.L. Thomas, C.J.
On December 20, 2017, the trial court issued an order of recusal in Appellant's case, and subsequently issued an order denying Appellant's motion to dissolve injunction, without prejudice to refile.
In the order of recusal, the judge indicated that he was aware of the grounds for recusal at the hearing on Appellant's motion, but still issued the order denying Appellant's motion after the hearing. We therefore vacate the order denying Appellant's motion to dissolve injunction and remand to the trial court for a new hearing on the motion. See Lance Block, P.A. v. Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart and Shipley, P.A. , 85 So.3d 1122, 1124 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (vacating order and remanding where trial judge "may well have known of the grounds for the recusal order when he entered the order" at issue) (footnote removed).
Wetherell and Winsor, JJ., concur.