Case Name: James REYLAND, Respondent, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, State of Missouri, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-12-26
Citations: 63 S.W.3d 679
Docket Number: No. ED 79137
Parties: James REYLAND, Respondent, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, State of Missouri, Appellant.
Judges: Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 63
Pages: 679–680

Head Matter:
James REYLAND, Respondent, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, State of Missouri, Appellant.
No. ED 79137.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Dec. 26, 2001.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Bernabé A. Icaza, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for appellant.
Jeffrey L. Ringling, St. Ann, MO, for respondent.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The Missouri Director of Revenue ("Director") appeals the judgment setting aside the revocation of James Reyland's ("Driver") driving privileges for refusing to submit to a chemical test. Director argues that the judgment is unsupported by substantial evidence and is against the weight of the evidence. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a brief memorandum, for their use only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).