Case Name: Victor Liotta, Appellant, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Albert McQueen, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1969-04-21
Citations: 32 A.D.2d 553
Docket Number: 
Parties: Victor Liotta, Appellant, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Albert McQueen, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 32
Pages: 553–553

Head Matter:
Victor Liotta, Appellant, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Albert McQueen, Respondent.

Opinion:
In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff Victor Liotta appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered April 2, 1968 after a nonjury trial, as limited his recovery to $1,250 plus costs and disbursements. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. In our opinion, the trier of the. facts was warranted in not adopting the opinion of appellant's medical expert as controlling in the case. Considering all the proof elicited upon the trial, the court (sitting without a jury) was free to reject the testimony of appellant's physician both as to the extent of appellant's 1963 injury and the causal relationship between that injury and the March, 1965, accident as unsupported by a preponderance of the credible evidence. Although respondent offered no medical evidence to contradict appellant's claims, the facts of the case raise great doubt as to the truthfulness and accuracy of appellant's own proof. Nor can we say, as a matter of law, that the verdict is inadequate. Brennan, Rabin, Benjamin and Martuscello, JJ., concur; Christ, Acting P. J., not voting.