Case Name: Eugene BICKLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-10-31
Citations: 204 S.W.3d 688
Docket Number: No. ED 87103
Parties: Eugene BICKLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GEORGE W. DRAPER III, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., J., and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 204
Pages: 688–689

Head Matter:
Eugene BICKLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 87103.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Oct. 31, 2006.
S. Kristina Starke, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Daniel N. McPherson, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondents.
Before GEORGE W. DRAPER III, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., J., and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Eugene Bickley ("Movant"), appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his amended Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Following a jury trial, Movant was convicted of one count of first degree murder, section 565.020, RSMo 1996, and one count of armed criminal action, section 571.015. Movant was sentenced as a prior offender to concurrent sentences of life without parole and life, respectively. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.
. All statutory references are to RSMo 1996 unless otherwise indicated.