Case Name: Abraham Ellis, Plaintiff in Error, v. State of Florida, Defendant in Error
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1926-06-11
Citations: 92 Fla. 12
Docket Number: 
Parties: Abraham Ellis, Plaintiff in Error, v. State of Florida, Defendant in Error.
Judges: Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 92
Pages: 12–12

Head Matter:
Abraham Ellis, Plaintiff in Error, v. State of Florida, Defendant in Error.
Division B.
Decision filed June 11, 1926.
Clifton D. Benson, John H. Bishop and B. E. Carey, for Plaintiff in Error;
J. B. Johnson, Attorney General, and H. E. Carter, Assistant, for the State.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court - that the said judgment of the Circuit Court, be and the same is hereby affirmed on authority of the opinion in Shaw v. The State of Florida, 88 Fla. 320, 102, South. Rep. 550.
Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.