Case Name: Corliss LAMONT, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF MOTOR VEHICLES and R. L. Polk & Co., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1967-12-12
Citations: 386 F.2d 449
Docket Number: No. 205, Docket 31595
Parties: Corliss LAMONT, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF MOTOR VEHICLES and R. L. Polk & Co., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 386
Pages: 449–450

Head Matter:
Corliss LAMONT, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF MOTOR VEHICLES and R. L. Polk & Co., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 205, Docket 31595.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued Nov. 28, 1967.
Decided Dec. 12, 1967.
Leonard Boudin, New York City (Ra-binowitz & Boudin, Victor Rabinowitz, New York City, David Rein, Washington, D. C., and Joan Goldberg, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant.
Mortimer Sattler, New York City (Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen., of the State of New York, Samuel A. Hirsho-witz, First Asst. Atty. Gen., and Joel Lewittes, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellee, Commissioner of Motor Vehicles.
Wyllys S. Newcomb, New York City (Royall, Koegel, Rogers & Wells, John M. O’Hara and Guy C. Quinlan, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-ap-pellee, R. L. Polk & Co.
Before MOORE, SMITH and HAYS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
We affirm for substantially the reasons contained in the opinion of Judge Frankel reported at 269 F.Supp. 880 (S.D.N.Y.1967).