Case Name: Perry Dean MASON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-10-18
Citations: 834 So. 2d 224
Docket Number: No. 2D01-3839
Parties: Perry Dean MASON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ALTENBERND, WHATLEY, and NORTHCUTT, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 834
Pages: 224–224

Head Matter:
Perry Dean MASON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D01-3839.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Oct. 18, 2002.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Perry Dean Mason challenges the trial court's order summarily denying his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm.
In his motion, Mason alleged that his plea was involuntary because defense counsel affirmatively misadvised him regarding the future sentencing-enhancing effects of the plea in regard to an as yet uncommitted crime. In Stansel v. State, 825 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), we held that this claim is not cognizable in a rule 3.850 motion. We certify the same question that we certified in Stansel. We affirm, without discussion, any other issues raised by Mason in his motion.
ALTENBERND, WHATLEY, and NORTHCUTT, JJ., Concur.