Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Jeffery CALHOUN, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-10-15
Citations: 87 S.W.3d 902
Docket Number: No. ED 80079
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Jeffery CALHOUN, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 87
Pages: 902–902

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Jeffery CALHOUN, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 80079.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Oct. 15, 2002.
Douglas Robert Hoff, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Anne E. Engington, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Jeffery Calhoun (Defendant) appeals from a judgment of conviction of attempted possession of a controlled substance. Defendant alleges trial court error in overruling his objection to a portion of the prosecutor's closing argument. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion. State v. Storey, 40 S.W.3d 898, 910 (Mo. banc 2001). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).