Case Name: JAY M. ACKLEY, APPELLANT, v. JAMES NORCROSS ET AL., RESPONDENTS
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1940-01-25
Citations: 124 N.J.L. 133
Docket Number: 
Parties: JAY M. ACKLEY, APPELLANT, v. JAMES NORCROSS ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 124
Pages: 133–133

Head Matter:
JAY M. ACKLEY, APPELLANT, v. JAMES NORCROSS ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Submitted October 27, 1939
Decided January 25, 1940.
For the appellant, William C. Gotshalk.
For the respondents, Albert H. Woodruff.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Porter in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Trenchard, Case, Bodine, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.