Case Name: C. H. THURMAN et al., etc., Appellants, v. LUCY A. RICHARDS, etc., Respondent
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1926-07-24
Citations: 79 Cal. App. 793
Docket Number: Civ. No. 3093
Parties: C. H. THURMAN et al., etc., Appellants, v. LUCY A. RICHARDS, etc., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports
Volume: 79
Pages: 793–794

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 3093.
Third Appellate District.
July 24, 1926.]
C. H. THURMAN et al., etc., Appellants, v. LUCY A. RICHARDS, etc., Respondent.
Orville C. Pratt, Jr., and George F. Jones for Appellants.
W. B. Rothe, District Attorney, and Bond & Deirup for Respondent.
Hill, Morgan & Bledsoe as Amici Curiae.

Opinion:
THE COURT.
For the reasons stated in the opinion in the case of McDonald v. Richards, ante, p. 1 [248 Pac. 1049], the judgment appealed from is affirmed.