Case Name: Yonkers Raceway, Inc., Respondent, v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa., et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1958-06-30
Citations: 6 A.D.2d 846
Docket Number: 
Parties: Yonkers Raceway, Inc., Respondent, v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa., et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 6
Pages: 846–846

Head Matter:
Yonkers Raceway, Inc., Respondent, v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa., et al., Appellants.

Opinion:
Plaintiff is a corporation organized to conduct harness horse race meetings. Its certificate of incorporation provides that its principal business office is located in New York County and that the location at which it is proposed to conduct its business is in Westchester County, both of which locations are required to be stated in the certificate by statute (L. 1940, eh. 254, § 37, as amd.). In this action the place of trial is designated as Westchester County. Defendants' motion, under section 182 of the Civil Practice Act and rule 146 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to change the place of trial from Westchester County to New York County, was denied. The appeal is from the order entered thereon. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Beldock, Murphy, Ughetta and Hallinan, J.J., concur; Nolan, P. J., dissents and votes to reverse the order and to grant the motion, with the following memorandum: I am of the opinion that the residence of plaintiff for purposes of venue is in New York County, where its principal business office is located, according to its certificate of incorporation, and that it may not be held to have an additional residence in Westchester County by virtue of a provision in such certificate that the location at which it is proposed to conduct said business is in that county. The exception to the general rule with respect to residence of corporations for venue purposes appears to be confined to cases involving railroad companies. (Cf. Poland v. United Traction Co., 88 App. Div. 281, affd. 177 N. Y. 557; May v. Bee Line, 180 Misc. 172; Ajax Rubber Co. v. Devine Co., 126 Misc. 341; Hearn v. Farrell Lines, 278 App. Div. 829; Jonas Equities v. 614 E. 14th St. Realty Corp., 282 App. Div. 773.) [9 Misc 2d 412.]