Case Name: Richard E. MILLER, Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee; Gertrude BRANNUM, Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1954-05-13
Citations: 212 F.2d 809
Docket Number: Nos. 11986, 11987
Parties: Richard E. MILLER, Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. Gertrude BRANNUM, Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 212
Pages: 809–810

Head Matter:
Richard E. MILLER, Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. Gertrude BRANNUM, Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
Nos. 11986, 11987.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued April 26, 1954.
Decided May 13, 1954.
Mr. Frank D. Reeves, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Curtis P. Mitchell, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellants.
Mr. Samuel J. L’Hommedieu, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Leo A. Rover, U. S. Atty., and Lewis A. Carroll and Arthur J. McLaughlin, Asst. U. S. Attys., Washing ton, D. C., were on the brief, for appel-lee. Mr. William J. Peck, Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., at time record was filed, entered an appearance for ap-pellee.
Before BAZELON, WASHINGTON and DANAHER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellants in these consolidated appeals were jointly tried and convicted for violations of the lottery laws. Their claims for reversal rest upon the contention that the trial court erred in denying their motions to suppress certain evidence obtained by police in the course of executing warrants to search the premises of appellant Miller and for his arrest Appellants vigorously assert that the warrants were issued without sufficient probable cause.
We think the motions were properly denied. The convictions are therefore
Affirmed.
. 22 D.C.Code 1951, § 1501, 1502.