Case Name: Jandson Realty Corp., Appellant, v. Patricia Rogers, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2002-06-07
Citations: 192 Misc. 2d 505
Docket Number: 
Parties: Jandson Realty Corp., Appellant, v Patricia Rogers, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 192
Pages: 505–506

Head Matter:
[747 NYS2d 135]
Jandson Realty Corp., Appellant, v Patricia Rogers, Respondent.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
June 7, 2002
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Andrew M. Romano, Yonkers, for appellant. Westchester/Putnam Legal Services, White Plains (Barbara Finkelstein and Judith B. Studebaker of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order affirmed without costs.
The record indicates that it was the longstanding practice of the prior owner to accept rent payments from the Department of Social Services (DSS) on behalf of tenant and indeed that this had been the practice from the inception of the tenancy six years before the commencement of this proceeding. Where, as here, the premises is rent stabilized, the prior owner's agreement from the commencement of the tenancy to accept DSS payments formed a condition of the tenancy which could not be unilaterally altered or withdrawn by either the prior or the current owner (see, Rent Stabilization Code [9 NYCRR] § 2503.5 [a]; Matter of Byrd v Nilson, DHCR Docket No. PK910001RV, Dec. 11, 2001; cf., Flumaj v Ferry, NYLJ, Mar. 5, 1996, at 29, col 5 [App Term, 9th & 10th Jud Dists] [where there is no history of acceptance of DSS payments by an owner, the owner is not required to accept such payments]). Inasmuch as the default in rent involved here was engendered by landlord's improper refusal to comply with the DSS requirements for the payment of rent, the petition is dismissed (Starrett City v Hamilton, NYLJ, Feb. 21, 1991, at 27, col 6 [App Term, 2d & 11th Jud Dists]).
Floyd, P.J., and Doyle, J., concur; Colabella, J., taking no part.