Case Name: William STOKES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-07-03
Citations: 581 So. 2d 651
Docket Number: No. 89-2589
Parties: William STOKES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: LETTS, GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 581
Pages: 651–651

Head Matter:
William STOKES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 89-2589.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
July 3, 1991.
John J. Anastasio of John J. Anastasio, P.A., Port St. Lucie, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Sylvia H. Alonso and Melynda Me-lear, Asst. Attys. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The only issue warranting discussion is the trial court's failure to enter written reasons for departing from the sentencing guidelines. We reverse in accordance with Ree v. State, 565 So.2d 1329 (Fla.1990) and Savory v. State, 576 So.2d 339 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). On remand, the trial court may not depart from the sentencing guideline sentence. Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla.1990).
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; REMANDED.
LETTS, GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.