Case Name: ALICE DESCHAMPS AND DESIRE JOSEPH DESCHAMPS, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. L. BAMBERGER & CO., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1943-02-08
Citations: 129 N.J.L. 517
Docket Number: 
Parties: ALICE DESCHAMPS AND DESIRE JOSEPH DESCHAMPS, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. L. BAMBERGER & CO., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 129
Pages: 517–518

Head Matter:
ALICE DESCHAMPS AND DESIRE JOSEPH DESCHAMPS, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. L. BAMBERGER & CO., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Argued October 22, 1942
Decided February 8, 1943.
For the respondents, John W. McGeehan, Jr.
For the appellant, George F. Lahey, Jr.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court, with the reservation, however, that we do not consider or pass upon the points argued in the briéf of appellant respecting alleged error committed by the trial court in certain rulings on evidence made during the course of the trial, and alleged error contained in the submission of the matter to the jury, for the reason that these points are not properly set forth in the grounds of appeal. Booth v. Keegan, 108 N. J. L. 538.
The judgment appealed from is affirmed.
For affirmance—Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Dear, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 8.
For reversal—The Chancellor, Case, Colie, Wells, JJ. 4.