Case Name: In re MARRIAGE OF Daniel GREEN, Jr. and Jeannette Marie Green. Daniel GREEN, Jr., Petitioner/Appellant, v. Jeannette Marie GREEN, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1993-10-26
Citations: 863 S.W.2d 674
Docket Number: Nos. 63060, 63357
Parties: In re MARRIAGE OF Daniel GREEN, Jr. and Jeannette Marie Green. Daniel GREEN, Jr., Petitioner/Appellant, v. Jeannette Marie GREEN, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANE, P.J., and KAROHL and CRAHAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 863
Pages: 674–674

Head Matter:
In re MARRIAGE OF Daniel GREEN, Jr. and Jeannette Marie Green. Daniel GREEN, Jr., Petitioner/Appellant, v. Jeannette Marie GREEN, Respondent/Respondent.
Nos. 63060, 63357.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Oct. 26, 1993.
Nathan Cohen, St. Louis, for petitioner, appellant.
Arthur Friedman, Cynthia Tolan, Friedman, Weitzman & Friedman, St. Louis, for respondent, respondent.
Before CRANE, P.J., and KAROHL and CRAHAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
This is a consolidated appeal from the trial court's orders sustaining respondent's motion to modify and motion for attorney's fees pending appeal. The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).