Case Name: HOLLOWELL, Appellant, v. CARTER et al, Respondents
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1978-02-13
Citations: 32 Or. App. 597
Docket Number: No. 77-156-L-3, CA 8993
Parties: HOLLOWELL, Appellant, v. CARTER et al, Respondents.
Judges: Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Thornton and Jospeh, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 32
Pages: 597–599

Head Matter:
Submitted on record and briefs January 31,
affirmed February 13, 1978
HOLLOWELL, Appellant, v. CARTER et al, Respondents.
(No. 77-156-L-3, CA 8993)
574 P2d 708
Arthur J. Hollowell, Central Point, filed the briefs for appellant.
John W. Eads, Jr., City Attorney, Medford, filed the brief for respondents.
Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Thornton and Jospeh, Judges.
PER CURIAM.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The dispositive issue in this case is whether a layman has a legal right, by virtue of the justice court statutes, to act as an attorney for another in a municipal court. He does not. Balcom v. Municipal Court, 23 Or App 218, 541 P2d 1307, rev den (1975).
Affirmed.
See Oregon Stale Bar v. Wright, 280 Or 693, 573 P2d 283 (1977).