Case Name: Richard Adams et al., Respondents, v. "Horace" Acker, Individually and Trading Under the Name of "Horace" Acker Realty Co., et al., Defendants, and Norman Levy et al., Appellants; Fernley Realty Corp. et al., ThirdParty Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Grand Union Company, Third-Party Respondent, et al., Third-Party Defendants
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1977-10-06
Citations: 42 N.Y.2d 1050
Docket Number: 
Parties: Richard Adams et al., Respondents, v "Horace” Acker, Individually and Trading Under the Name of "Horace” Acker Realty Co., et al., Defendants, and Norman Levy et al., Appellants. Fernley Realty Corp. et al., ThirdParty Plaintiffs-Appellants, v Grand Union Company, Third-Party Respondent, et al., Third-Party Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 42
Pages: 1050–1050

Head Matter:
Richard Adams et al., Respondents, v "Horace” Acker, Individually and Trading Under the Name of "Horace” Acker Realty Co., et al., Defendants, and Norman Levy et al., Appellants. Fernley Realty Corp. et al., ThirdParty Plaintiffs-Appellants, v Grand Union Company, Third-Party Respondent, et al., Third-Party Defendants.
Submitted July 25, 1977;
decided October 6, 1977

Opinion:
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed, with $20 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements, upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution (see CPLR 5602; Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, § 11, p 42).