Case Name: Virginia TAMBUNAN, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-01-18
Citations: 264 F. App'x 640
Docket Number: No. 04-71867
Parties: Virginia TAMBUNAN, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 264
Pages: 640–641

Head Matter:
Virginia TAMBUNAN, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 04-71867.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 14, 2008.
Filed Jan. 18, 2008.
Kaaren L. Barr, Esq., Seattle, WA, for Petitioner.
Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, James E. Grimes, Esq., Mary Jane Candaux, Esq., DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: HALL, O’SCANNLAIN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Virginia Tambunan, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' decision affirming without opinion an Immigration Judge's denial of her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture.
Tambunan failed to exhaust the claims presented in her petition for review. See Zara v. Ashcroft, 383 F.3d 927, 930-31 (9th Cir.2004). Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for review. See id.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.