Case Name: Andrew James ROSEMAN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-09-19
Citations: 585 So. 2d 1184
Docket Number: No. 91-1759
Parties: Andrew James ROSEMAN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: DAUKSCH, COBB and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 585
Pages: 1184–1185

Head Matter:
Andrew James ROSEMAN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 91-1759.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Sept. 19, 1991.
Andrew James Roseman, Raiford, pro se.
No Appearance for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner is in prison for armed robbery, burglary, grand theft and grand theft auto and has filed a motion for leave to apply for Writ of Error Coram Nobis, alleging that he has discovered new evidence regarding his conviction. His claim of newly discovered evidence must be raised in the trial court under a Rule 3.850 motion. See Richardson v. State, 546 So.2d 1037 (Fla.1989). The motion for leave to proceed is denied, without prejudice to file a Rule 3.850 motion in the trial court.
WRIT DENIED.
DAUKSCH, COBB and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.