Case Name: Harold Bruce, Respondent, v. Woll Bros., Inc., Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1960-10-13
Citations: 8 N.Y.2d 1052
Docket Number: 
Parties: Harold Bruce, Respondent, v. Woll Bros., Inc., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 8
Pages: 1052–1053

Head Matter:
Harold Bruce, Respondent, v. Woll Bros., Inc., Appellant.
Argued October 5, 1960;
decided October 13, 1960.
Isaac C. Donner and Lazaar Henkin for appellant.
Harry Stackell for respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed, with costs. The landlord was privileged under the judgment in the form appealed from to make whatever decorations, repairs, alterations or improvements or additions as were permitted by paragraph 13 in the lease, provided the store frontage or display window as installed by the tenant pursuant to paragraph 39 of the lease was not affected or impaired. No opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster.