Case Name: John S. STRITZINGER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA; Vernon Wright, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-05-20
Citations: 649 F. App'x 320
Docket Number: No. 14-2356
Parties: John S. STRITZINGER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA; Vernon Wright, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 649
Pages: 320–320

Head Matter:
John S. STRITZINGER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA; Vernon Wright, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 14-2356.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 18, 2016.
Decided: May 20, 2016.
John S. Stritzinger, Appellant Pro Se.
Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
John S. Stritzinger appeals the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation and dismissing his complaint without prejudice for failing to comply with a court order. On appeal, we confíne our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Stritzinger's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, Stritzinger has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. Accordingly, we grant Stritzinger leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny the motion to remand, and affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
We conclude that Stritzinger timely filed his notice of appeal, See Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988).