Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Angel PEREZ-FIERRO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-11-26
Citations: 256 F. App'x 96
Docket Number: No. 07-50114
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jose Angel PEREZ-FIERRO, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: TROTT, W. FLETCHER and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 256
Pages: 96–97

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jose Angel PEREZ-FIERRO, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 07-50114.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 13, 2007.
Filed Nov. 26, 2007.
Eugene S. Litvinoff, Esq., USSD-Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
John R. Fielding, Jr., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: TROTT, W. FLETCHER and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Jose Angel Perez-Fierro appeals from the revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Perez-Fierro contends that the revocation proceedings violated his right to due process because he did not receive written notice of the conditions of supervised release. We disagree. The district court gave Perez-Fierro actual notice orally at his original sentencing hearing that he was forbidden from reentering or attempting to reenter the United States illegally. We conclude that the district court's alleged failure to give written notice did not violate due process. See United States v. Ortega-Brito, 311 F.3d 1136, 1138 (9th Cir.2002).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.