Case Name: Moore et al. v. Carey, guardian
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1903-11-28
Citations: 119 Ga. 91
Docket Number: 
Parties: Moore et al. v. Carey, guardian.
Judges: All the Justices concur.
Reporter: Georgia Reports
Volume: 119
Pages: 91–92

Head Matter:
Moore et al. v. Carey, guardian.
Argued. October 30,
Decided November 28, 1903.

Opinion:
Turnes, J.
1. " While a trial judge may, within the restrictions prescribed in the Civil Code, § 5331, direct a verdict, this court will in no case overrule as erroneous a refusal to do so." Kelly v. Strouse, 116 Ga. 873.
2. The present case is controlled by the rule of practice above announced.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.
Complaint for land. Before Judge Lewis. Taliaferro superior •c'ourt. February term, 1903.
, Hawes Cloud and Colley & Sims, for plaintiffs in error.
Samuel H. Sibley, contra.