Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ricardo Antonio De LOS SANTOS-MORA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-08-02
Citations: 15 F. App'x 125
Docket Number: No. 01-6470
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ricardo Antonio De LOS SANTOS-MORA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 15
Pages: 125–126

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ricardo Antonio De LOS SANTOS-MORA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 01-6470.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 26, 2001.
Decided Aug. 2, 2001.
Ricardo Antonio De Los Santos-Mora, pro se. Robert Edward Bradenham, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, VA, for appellee.
Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Ricardo Antonio De Los Santos-Mora seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny De Los Santos-Mora's motions for a certificate of appealability and to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. De Los Santos-Mora, No. CR-96-49 (E.D.Va. Feb. 15, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.