Case Name: Andre RHODES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ELECTRONIC DATA SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-02-15
Citations: 267 F. App'x 565
Docket Number: No. 07-16425
Parties: Andre RHODES, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. ELECTRONIC DATA SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before: WALLACE, LEAVY and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 267
Pages: 565–565

Head Matter:
Andre RHODES, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. ELECTRONIC DATA SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 07-16425.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 11, 2008 .
Filed Feb. 15, 2008.
Andre Rhodes, Sacramento, CA, pro se.
Baker & Hostetler LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Stephen C. Sutton, Esq., Jenkens & Gilchrist, Cleveland, OH, for DefendantAppellee.
Before: WALLACE, LEAVY and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
A review of the record and the responses to the order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.
All pending motions are denied as moot.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.