Case Name: Francis E. Larkin et al., appellants, v. James H. Wikoff et al., defendant-respondents
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1910-11-14
Citations: 77 N.J. Eq. 589
Docket Number: 
Parties: Francis E. Larkin et al., appellants, v. James H. Wikoff et al., defendant-respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 77
Pages: 589–589

Head Matter:
Francis E. Larkin et al., appellants, v. James H. Wikoff et al., defendant-respondents.
[Argued July 8th and 11th, 1910.
Decided November 14th, 1910.]
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Walker, whose opinion is reported in 75 N. J. Eq. (5 Buch.) 462.
Mr. John V. B. Wicoff, for the defendant-respondents.
Mr. Adrian S. Appelget, for the appellants.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
So much of the decree as is involved in this appeal will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed by Vice-Chancellor Walker in the court below.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parke?, Bergen, Voori-iees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Dill, Congdon — 13.
For reversal — None.