Case Name: Frederick Sackett, Respondent, v. Jacob Lippman et al., Appellants
Court: New York City Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1894-10
Citations: 10 Misc. 776
Docket Number: 
Parties: Frederick Sackett, Respondent, v. Jacob Lippman et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 10
Pages: 776–776

Head Matter:
CITY COURT OF NEW YORK
GENERAL TERM,
OCTOBER, 1894.
Frederick Sackett, Respondent, v. Jacob Lippman et al., Appellants.
Appeal from judgment in favor of plaintiff.
Gcmtor da Van Sehaioh, for respondent.
Einste'm da Townsend, for appellants.

Opinion:
Fitzsimons, J.
The testimony not only is sufficient to" sustain the verdict, but in our judgment preponderates in plaintiff's favor.
The judgment is, therefore, affirmed, with costs.
Newburger, J., concurs.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.