Case Name: Robert Keith KEEFER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1981-05-05
Citations: 397 So. 2d 1181
Docket Number: No. 80-965
Parties: Robert Keith KEEFER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ and FERGUSON, JJ., and EZELL, BOYCE F., Jr. (Ret.), Associate Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 397
Pages: 1181–1181

Head Matter:
Robert Keith KEEFER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 80-965.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 5, 1981.
J. Edward Worton, Key West, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Joel D. Rosen-blatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ and FERGUSON, JJ., and EZELL, BOYCE F., Jr. (Ret.), Associate Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellant claims error in a jury instruction that possession of cannabis is a lesser included offense of the crime of sale or delivery as charged in the information. We find both (a) that Keefer did not preserve the alleged error for appellate review, see Carter v. State, 380 So.2d 541 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980), cert. denied, 388 So.2d 1110 (Fla.1980); Thompson v. State, 368 So.2d 670 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), and cases cited; and (b) that, as was squarely held in the case of his co-defendant, Bradshaw v. State, (Fla. 3d DCA Case No. 80-966, opinion filed, February 10, 1981), his contention is substantively incorrect on the facts involved below.
Affirmed.