Case Name: Janine BAIN, Appellant, v. Linda HILL, as personal representative of the Estate of Raymond E. LeDuc, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1994-07-05
Citations: 639 So. 2d 178
Docket Number: No. 94-302
Parties: Janine BAIN, Appellant, v. Linda HILL, as personal representative of the Estate of Raymond E. LeDuc, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and JORGENSON and GODERICH, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 639
Pages: 178–179

Head Matter:
Janine BAIN, Appellant, v. Linda HILL, as personal representative of the Estate of Raymond E. LeDuc, Appellee.
No. 94-302.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 5, 1994.
William A. Greenberg, Fern Park, for appellant.
Carlson & Bales and Curtis Carlson and Julie A. Moxley, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and JORGENSON and GODERICH, JJ.

Opinion:
SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from an order admitting a will to probate after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
The conclusion below that the testator signed at the "end" of his will, § 732.-502(l)(a)l, Fla.Stat. (1993), is squarely supported by Bradley v. Bradley, 371 So.2d 168 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), in which, incredibly, the testator signed the will at the same erroneous place on the same Rameo form as Mr. LeDuc. We also reject the alternative claim that the attestation of the will was insufficient under section 732.502(l)(b) & (c) because there was evidence that at least one of the witnesses signed before the testator. Even if this were the ease, we agree with Waldrep v. Goodwin, 230 Ga. 1, 196 S.E.2d 432 (1973) that so long as (a) the witnesses saw the testator sign the will and (b) they signed it in his presence and that of each other, the order in which this occurred makes no difference. As the court stated:
[T]here can be no fraud when [as in the present case] all parties sit at the same table and affix their signatures in the presence of each other regardless of who signs first.
Waldrep, 195 S.E.2d at 435; accord In re Estate of Lee, 225 Cal.App.2d 578, 37 Cal.Rptr. 572 (1964); Conway v. Conway, 14 Ill.2d 461, 153 N.E.2d 11 (1958); Hopson v. Ewing, 353 S.W.2d 203 (Ky.App.1961); Wilkinson v. White, 8 Utah 2d 336, 334 P.2d 564 (1959).
Affirmed.
. Execution of wills. — Every will must be in writing and executed as follows:
(l)(a) Testator's signature.—
1. The testator must sign the will at the end; or
2. The testator's name must be subscribed at the end of the will by some other person in the testator's presence and by his direction.
(b) Witnesses. — The testator's:
1. Signing, or
2. Acknowledgment:
a. That he has previously signed the will, or
b. That another person has subscribed the testator's name to it,
must be in the presence of at least two attesting witnesses.
(c) Witnesses' signatures. — The attesting witnesses must sign the will in the presence of the testator and in the presence of each other....
§ 732.502, Fla.Stat. (1993).
. Ibid.