Case Name: Irene HITCHENS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carolyn W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-12-29
Citations: 627 F. App'x 238
Docket Number: No. 15-1066
Parties: Irene HITCHENS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carolyn W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 627
Pages: 238–238

Head Matter:
Irene HITCHENS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carolyn W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 15-1066.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 30, 2015.
Decided: Dec. 29, 2015.
William Lee Davis, III, Lumberton, North Carolina, for Appellant. Thomas G. Walker, United States Attorney, R.A. Renter, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, David N. Mervis, Special Assistant United. States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Irene Hitchens appeals the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation and upholding the Commissioner's denial of Hitchens' applications for disability benefits and supplemental security income. Our review of the Commissioner's determination is limited to evaluating whether the findings are supported by substantial evidence and whether the correct law was applied. See Mascio v. Colvin, 780 F.3d 632, 634 (4th Cir.2015).
We have thoroughly reviewed the parties' briefs, the administrative record, and the joint appendix, and we discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. Hitchens v. Colvin, No. 7:13-cv-00040-FL, 2014 WL 6977765 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 9, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. '
AFFIRMED.