Case Name: The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Mary HILL, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-09-17
Citations: 585 So. 2d 504
Docket Number: No. 91-292
Parties: The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Mary HILL, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and GODERICH, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 585
Pages: 504–504

Head Matter:
The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Mary HILL, Appellee.
No. 91-292.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Sept. 17, 1991.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Barbara Arlene Fink, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Rosa C. Figarola, Asst. Public Defender, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and GODERICH, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Because, as the appellee concedes, the trial court lacked the authority to deviate from the three year minimum mandatory sentence required by section 893.13(1)(e)1, Florida Statutes (1989); State v. Rodriguez, 585 So.2d 504 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); State v. Padron, 580 So.2d 903 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); State v. Baez-Acuna, 559 So.2d 1298 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), the sentence is vacated and the cause remanded for further proceedings. The defendant shall be granted the opportunity to withdraw the guilty plea which was based upon the offer of a reduced sentence. Padron, 580 So.2d 903; Baez-Acuna, 559 So.2d at 1298.