Case Name: CHARLES A. CORIELL, APPELLANT, v. BOROUGH OF DUNELLEN ET AL., RESPONDENTS
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1939-09-22
Citations: 123 N.J.L. 264
Docket Number: 
Parties: CHARLES A. CORIELL, APPELLANT, v. BOROUGH OF DUNELLEN ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 123
Pages: 264–265

Head Matter:
CHARLES A. CORIELL, APPELLANT, v. BOROUGH OF DUNELLEN ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Argued May 19, 1939
Decided September 22, 1939.
For the appellant, Joseph J. Mutnik.
For the respondents, Henry Handelman.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.