Case Name: Daniel EPSTEIN and Max Brooks, Appellants, v. Alfred DENOWITZ, Esquire, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1986-04-16
Citations: 487 So. 2d 365
Docket Number: No. 85-1404
Parties: Daniel EPSTEIN and Max Brooks, Appellants, v. Alfred DENOWITZ, Esquire, Appellee.
Judges: DOWNEY, WALDEN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 487
Pages: 365–365

Head Matter:
Daniel EPSTEIN and Max Brooks, Appellants, v. Alfred DENOWITZ, Esquire, Appellee.
No. 85-1404.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
April 16, 1986.
Rehearing Denied May 7, 1986.
Robert H. Dolman, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.
Jesse S. Faerber of Fenster and Faerber, P.A., Plantation, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the order dismissing appellant's complaint with prejudice and remand with instructions to allow appellants leave to amend their complaint if they are so advised. County School Board v. K.D. Hedin Construction, 382 So.2d 90 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Osborne v. Delta Maintenance and Welding, Inc., 365 So.2d 425 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978); L.C. Morris, Inc., v. Allison, 277 So.2d 28 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973).
Reversed and Remanded.
DOWNEY, WALDEN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.