Case Name: BOND, guardian, et al. v. CURD et al.
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1928-08-16
Citations: 166 Ga. 717
Docket Number: No. 6353
Parties: BOND, guardian, et al. v. CURD et al.
Judges: All the Justices concur.
Reporter: Georgia Reports
Volume: 166
Pages: 717–719

Head Matter:
BOND, guardian, et al. v. CURD et al.
No. 6353.
August 16, 1928.
B. Noel Steed and J. A. McFarland, for plaintiffs.
G. N. King, for defendants.

Opinion:
Atkinson, J.
On the issue of the plaintiffs' right to injunction the controlling question depends upon the authority of the executors, under a proper construction of the will, to manage and control the property during the life of Clarence H. Douglas. So much of the will as is material to this question is to be found in items three, five, six, seven, and nine of the will, which are set out in the statement of facts. Under a proper construction the executors were authorized to manage and control the realty at least during the incapacity of Clarence H. Douglas; and the order of the court was not erroneous in so far as it refused a temporary injunction.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.