Case Name: The STATE of Louisiana, William Kimball, H.M. Kimball, Jr., and Elizabeth Kimball Lewis, Individually and as Representatives of a Class of Those Similarly Situated v. SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, L.P., et al.; The State of Louisiana and XCL, Ltd., et al., Individually and as Representatives of a Class of Those Similarly Situated v. Wiltel, Inc., et al.
Court: Louisiana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 2005-12-09
Citations: 916 So. 2d 1057
Docket Number: No. 2005-C-1190
Parties: The STATE of Louisiana, William Kimball, H.M. Kimball, Jr., and Elizabeth Kimball Lewis, Individually and as Representatives of a Class of Those Similarly Situated v. SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, L.P., et al. The State of Louisiana and XCL, Ltd., et al., Individually and as Representatives of a Class of Those Similarly Situated v. Wiltel, Inc., et al.
Judges: KIMBALL, J., recused.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 916
Pages: 1057–1057

Head Matter:
The STATE of Louisiana, William Kimball, H.M. Kimball, Jr., and Elizabeth Kimball Lewis, Individually and as Representatives of a Class of Those Similarly Situated v. SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, L.P., et al. The State of Louisiana and XCL, Ltd., et al., Individually and as Representatives of a Class of Those Similarly Situated v. Wiltel, Inc., et al.
No. 2005-C-1190.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Dec. 9, 2005.

Opinion:
In re Sprint Communications Co. L.P. et al.; US Telecom, Incorporated; UTEL-COM, Inc.; UCOM, Inc.; — Defendant(s); Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of W. Baton Rouge, 18th Judicial District Court Div. C, Nos. 26,834, 26,304; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No(s). 2003 CA 1264, 2003 CA 1265.
Denied.
KIMBALL, J., recused.
CALOGERO, C.J., would grant the writ.
KNOLL, J., would grant the writ.