Case Name: Melissa DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-12-12
Citations: 208 S.W.3d 343
Docket Number: No. ED 87524
Parties: Melissa DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 208
Pages: 343–344

Head Matter:
Melissa DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 87524.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Dec. 12, 2006.
Gwenda R. Robinson (Public Defender), St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Melissa Davis (Davis) appeals the Judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County (Court), the Honorable Larry L. Kendrick presiding. Davis pled guilty to three counts of Forgery, Section 570.090.1. The Court sentenced Davis, as a persistent felony offender under Section 558.016, to three concurrent eight year imprisonment terms. Davis filed a pro se Rule 24.035 motion, which the Court denied without an evidentiary hearing.
On appeal, Davis argues that the Court erred when it denied her Rule 24.035 motion. Davis claims she pled facts, not refuted by the record, which indicate that her plea counsel failed to discuss sentence enhancement and parole ineligibility with her before the guilty plea. We have re viewed the briefs and the Record on Appeal, and find no error of law in this case. Thus, a written opinion would have no precedential value. The Judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).