Case Name: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Cordova
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1993-08-04
Citations: 67 Ohio St. 3d 25
Docket Number: No. 92-2192
Parties: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Cordova.
Judges: A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 67
Pages: 25–28

Head Matter:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Cordova.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Cordova (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 25.]
(No. 92-2192
Submitted February 10, 1993
Decided August 4, 1993.)
J. Warren Bettis, Disciplinary Counsel, and Karen B. Hull, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.
Mark H. Aultman, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We concur in the findings of misconduct by the board. However, we differ with the board's recommendation. We order instead that respondent be publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Moyer, C.J., and Wright, J., dissent.