Case Name: In the Matter of M. M., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. M. M., Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2012-04-25
Citations: 249 Or. App. 519
Docket Number: MC040020I; A145690
Parties: In the Matter of M. M., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. M. M., Appellant.
Judges: Before Schuman, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Nakamoto, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 249
Pages: 519–520

Head Matter:
Submitted March 2,
reversed April 25, 2012
In the Matter of M. M., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. M. M., Appellant.
Umatilla County Circuit Court
MC040020I; A145690
277 P3d 624
Michael Breiling filed the brief for appellant.
John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General, and Laura S. Anderson, Senior Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Schuman, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Nakamoto, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that he is a danger to others or unable to provide for his basic needs because of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(1)(e). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state's concession, and reverse.
Reversed.