Case Name: URBIETA OIL, INC., Appellant, v. Vivianna RUIZ, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2016-03-02
Citations: 186 So. 3d 617
Docket Number: No. 3D15-704
Parties: URBIETA OIL, INC., Appellant, v. Vivianna RUIZ, Appellee.
Judges: Before ROTHENBERG, EMAS and FERNANDEZ, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 186
Pages: 617–618

Head Matter:
URBIETA OIL, INC., Appellant, v. Vivianna RUIZ, Appellee.
No. 3D15-704.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 2, 2016.
Duane Morris LLP, Scott D. Kravetz and Richard D. Shane, for appellant.
Rodier & Rodier and Brian M. Rodier, Hallandale, for appellee.
Before ROTHENBERG, EMAS and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Koster v. Sullivan, 160 So.3d 385 (Fla.2015); Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC v. Gibraltar Private Bank & Trust Co., 162 So.3d 1058, 1060 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015)(stating "[i]f the return [of service] is regular on its face, then the service of process is presumed to be valid and the party challenging service has the burden of overcoming that presumption by clear and convincing evidence.")(quoting Koster, 160 So.3d at 389).