Case Name: Tripo Krstovic, Appellant, v. Charles H. Van Buren and Samuel W. Day, Copartners, Doing Business under the Name and Style of C. H. Van Buren & Co., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1920-11
Citations: 194 A.D. 942
Docket Number: 
Parties: Tripo Krstovic, Appellant, v. Charles H. Van Buren and Samuel W. Day, Copartners, Doing Business under the Name and Style of C. H. Van Buren & Co., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 194
Pages: 942–942

Head Matter:
Tripo Krstovic, Appellant, v. Charles H. Van Buren and Samuel W. Day, Copartners, Doing Business under the Name and Style of C. H. Van Buren & Co., Respondents.

Opinion:
Judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the evidence, including the correspondence between the defendants and Kline, presented a question for the consideration of the jury. All concur.