Case Name: Iris MENA, Plaintiff-Appellee, and Jose E. Mena, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SIMI VALLEY; Randy G. Adams; Marvin Hodges; Roy Jones; Vincent Allegra; Alan McCord; Richard Thomas; Ronald Chambers; William Lappin; Arnold Baynard; Jeffrey Dominick; Jack Greenburg; Richard Lamb; Frank Ahlvers; John Adamczyk; Tim Brown, Defendants, and Darin L. Muehler; Robert Brill, Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-01-14
Citations: 354 F.3d 1015
Docket Number: No. 01-56673
Parties: Iris MENA, Plaintiff-Appellee, and Jose E. Mena, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SIMI VALLEY; Randy G. Adams; Marvin Hodges; Roy Jones; Vincent Allegra; Alan McCord; Richard Thomas; Ronald Chambers; William Lappin; Arnold Baynard; Jeffrey Dominick; Jack Greenburg; Richard Lamb; Frank Ahlvers; John Adamczyk; Tim Brown, Defendants, and Darin L. Muehler; Robert Brill, Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: Before: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and ARCHER, Jr. , Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 354
Pages: 1015–1020

Head Matter:
Iris MENA, Plaintiff-Appellee, and Jose E. Mena, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SIMI VALLEY; Randy G. Adams; Marvin Hodges; Roy Jones; Vincent Allegra; Alan McCord; Richard Thomas; Ronald Chambers; William Lappin; Arnold Baynard; Jeffrey Dominick; Jack Greenburg; Richard Lamb; Frank Ahlvers; John Adamczyk; Tim Brown, Defendants, and Darin L. Muehler; Robert Brill, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 01-56673.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Jan. 14, 2004.
James S. Muller, Law Offices of James S. Muller, Los Angeles, CA; and Paul L. Hoffman, Esq., Schonbrun, Desimone, Seplow, Harris and Hoffman, LLP, Venice, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
James S. Muller, Law Offices of James S. Muller, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff.
David L. Nye, Esq., Nye Peabody & Stirling, Santa Barbara, CA, for Defendants.
David L. Nye, Esq., and Karen K. Peabody, Esq., Nye Peabody & Stirling, Santa Barbara, CA, for Defendants-Appellants.
Before: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and ARCHER, Jr. , Circuit Judges.
. The Honorable Glenn L. Archer, Jr., Senior Circuit Judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
ORDER
The panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and the suggestion for rehearing en banc.
The full court was advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the non-recused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
The petition for rehearing and the suggestion for rehearing en banc are denied.