Case Name: State of Florida ex rel. C. J. Clark, Plaintiff in Error, v. E. D. Vaughn, Chief of Police, City of St. Petersburg, Defendant in Error
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1926-11-22
Citations: 92 Fla. 963
Docket Number: 
Parties: State of Florida ex rel. C. J. Clark, Plaintiff in Error, v. E. D. Vaughn, Chief of Police, City of St. Petersburg, Defendant in Error.
Judges: Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 92
Pages: 963–964

Head Matter:
State of Florida ex rel. C. J. Clark, Plaintiff in Error, v. E. D. Vaughn, Chief of Police, City of St. Petersburg, Defendant in Error.
Division B.
Opinion Filed November 22, 1926.
James F. Bickers, for Plaintiff in Error;
Booth & Hobson, A. 8. Bradley and Mabry, Reaves & Carlton, for Defendant in Error.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The writ of error in this case was issued on the 17th day of May, 1926, and was made returnable to the 10th day of June, 1926. This was in compliance with Section 3580, Rev. Gen. Statutes. of Fla., and also complied with the view expressed by this Court in the case of Carter v. State, 65 Fla. 347.
In the case of Gillooley, Appellant, v. Vaughn et al., Appellee, in opinion filed at this term of the Court, this Court held that ordinance 422-a, the validity of which is here questioned, appeared to be valid in all respects.
The order of the Circuit Court remanding the petitioner to the custody of E. D. Vaughn, as Chief of Police of the City of St. Petersburg, is now affirmed upon the authority of the opinion in the case of Gillooley v. Vaughn, filed at this term of the Court.
Affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Brown, C. J., and Ellis and Strum, J. J., concur in the opinion.