Case Name: Bakari Darnell MACKEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Conrad M. GRABER and US Attorney's Office, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-06-10
Citations: 654 F. App'x 290
Docket Number: No. 14-15886
Parties: Bakari Darnell MACKEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Conrad M. GRABER and US Attorney’s Office, Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: Before: WALLACE, SCHROEDER, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 654
Pages: 290–290

Head Matter:
Bakari Darnell MACKEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Conrad M. GRABER and US Attorney’s Office, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 14-15886
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted April 12, 2016 San Francisco, California
FILED June 10, 2016
Francisco Leon, Esquire, Attorney, Law Office of Francisco Leon, Tucson, AZ, for Petitioner-Appellant.
Bakari Darnell Mackey, Pro Se.
Denise Ann Faulk, Esquire, U.S. Attorney, USTU—Office of the US Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Respondents-Appellees.
Before: WALLACE, SCHROEDER, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Bakari Mackey appeals from the district court's- judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. Mackey asserts that his due process rights were violated by failures of his inmate representative and the prison discipline hearing officer's denial of his right to call witnesses on his behalf at a prison disciplinary hearing. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we review the district court judgment de novo. United States v. Lemoine, 546 F.3d 1042, 1046 (9th Cir. 2008).
We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its order filed on April 7, 2014, adopting the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
. Mackey's pending pro se motion for judicial notice is denied as moot.