Case Name: In the Matter of the Compensation of Lester M. Gibson, Claimant. ROSEBURG FOREST PRODUCTS, Petitioner, v. Lester M. GIBSON, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1993-03-17
Citations: 118 Or. App. 734
Docket Number: WCB 91-02736; CA A75862
Parties: In the Matter of the Compensation of Lester M. Gibson, Claimant. ROSEBURG FOREST PRODUCTS, Petitioner, v. Lester M. GIBSON, Respondent.
Judges: Before Rossman, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Leeson, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 118
Pages: 734–734

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted February 19,
reversed and remanded March 17, 1993
In the Matter of the Compensation of Lester M. Gibson, Claimant. ROSEBURG FOREST PRODUCTS, Petitioner, v. Lester M. GIBSON, Respondent.
(WCB 91-02736; CA A75862)
848 P2d 145
Adam T. Stamper and Cowling & Heysell, Medford, filed the brief for petitioner.
J. Michael Casey argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Doblie & Associates, Portland.
Before Rossman, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Leeson, Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Reversed and remanded. SAIF v. Herron, 114 Or App 64, 836 P2d 131, rev den 315 Or 271 (1992).