Case Name: Oscar PADILLA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-10-15
Citations: 485 F. App'x 266
Docket Number: No. 08-75145
Parties: Oscar PADILLA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: RAWLINSON, MURGUIA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 485
Pages: 266–267

Head Matter:
Oscar PADILLA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 08-75145.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 9, 2012.
Filed Oct. 15, 2012.
Richard Flores Lemus, Esquire, Law Offices of Richard F. Lemus, Fullerton, CA, for Petitioner.
Ann M. Welhaf, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: RAWLINSON, MURGUIA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Oscar Padilla, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge's removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Gil v. Holder, 651 F.3d 1000, 1002 (9th Cir.2011), and we deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not err in determining that Padilla may not impute his father's lawful permanent residence for purposes of meeting the requirements of 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a)(2). See Sawyers v. Holder, 684 F.3d 911 (9th Cir.2012) (per curiam).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.