Case Name: RUSSELL et v. UNITED STATES
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1926-05-14
Citations: 4 Ohio Law Abs. 585
Docket Number: Nos. 4473-75
Parties: RUSSELL et v. UNITED STATES
Judges: 
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 4
Pages: 585–586

Head Matter:
RUSSELL et v. UNITED STATES
U. S. Appeals, 6th Circuit
Nos. 4473-75.
Decided May 14, 1926

Opinion:
KNAPPEN, C. J.
Joshua E. Russell and others were convicted in the District Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Ohio of conspiracy to withdraw from a distillery warehouse a large amount of whisky, and unlawfully possess, transport, accept, receive and sell such whisky; and to defraud the United States of taxes thereon.
Error was prosecuted to the judgment of conviction by the defendants; and the Circuit Court of Appeals held:
1. In federal courts, the judge may express an opinion on the facts to the jury provided no general rule of law is incorrectly stated and the jury is given to understand that they are not bound by the judge's opinion.
2. In stating his opinion as to credibility of a witness, it is not improper for the judge to cite testimony in supporting his opinion.
3. This court will not assume that the trial judge emphasized certain words so as to give them coercive effect, such words being on their face, proper.
Attorneys — Day & Day, Joseph C. Breitenstein, Cleveland, Charles S. Druggan, Columbus, for Russell et; A. E. Bernsteen & Miles E. Evans, Cleveland, for United States.
4. The court exercised its sound discretion in allowing a witness to claim the privilege of refusing to testify on ground that he might tend to incriminate himself; and the witness is not required to show how the incrimination might occur for to do so might render the privilege valueless.
Judgment affirmed.