Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard GRAVELY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-10-19
Citations: 333 F. App'x 792
Docket Number: No. 09-6693
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Richard GRAVELY, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 333
Pages: 792–792

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Richard GRAVELY, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 09-6693.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 15, 2009.
Decided: Oct. 19, 2009.
Richard Gravely, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Grimes Johnston, Assistant United States Attorney, Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Richard Gravely appeals the district court's order adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying Gravely's Fed.R.Crim.P. 35 motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Gravely, No. 3:94-cr-00082-1, 2009 WL 981836 (S.D.W.Va. Apr. 9, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.