Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rohan St. Joseph KEATING, a/k/a Charles Joe, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-10-17
Citations: 297 F. App'x 205
Docket Number: No. 08-6989
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Rohan St. Joseph KEATING, a/k/a Charles Joe, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 297
Pages: 205–205

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Rohan St. Joseph KEATING, a/k/a Charles Joe, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 08-6989.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 14, 2008.
Decided: Oct. 17, 2008.
Rohan St. Joseph Keating, Appellant Pro Se. Carol M. Marx, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Scott W. Putney, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before KING, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Rohan St. Joseph Keating appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Keating, No. 2:93-cr-00066-HCM-2 (E.D. Va. filed May 5, 2008; entered May 7, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.