Case Name: Sarah Bornstein vs. R. H. White Company
Court: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Jurisdiction: Massachusetts
Decision Date: 1927-03-24
Citations: 259 Mass. 34
Docket Number: 
Parties: Sarah Bornstein vs. R. H. White Company.
Judges: 
Reporter: Massachusetts Reports
Volume: 259
Pages: 34–35

Head Matter:
Sarah Bornstein vs. R. H. White Company.
Suffolk.
March 22. 1927.
March 24, 1927.
Present: Rügg, C.J., Pierce, Carroll, Wait, & Sanderson, JJ,
C. M. Pratt, for the defendant.
J. T. Cassidy, for the. plaintiff.

Opinion:
Rugg, C.J.
This is an action of tort by one, who was in a retail store to make a purchase, to recover compensation for injuries sustained by slipping upon a marble stairway. Her testimony was "that as she started up the first step she saw a man about ten steps up with a mop; that he was mopping coming down the stairway . . . that she proceeded up the stairway and noticed nothing before she fell; that she slipped on the fifth step . . . that as she fell she noticed a wet spot on the surface of the fifth step which was four or five, or six inches across . . . that she didn't notice any other step wet." The plaintiff also introduced evidence to the effect that porters were employed by the defendant to keep the store clean, for which they used brooms, brushes, mops and dusters. There was no evidence of negligence on the part of the defendant. There was nothing to show that the mop used by the defendant's servant was a wet mop and not a dry mop, and there was nothing to warrant an inference that the wet spot was caused by the defendant or had been upon the step any appreciable length of time. The case is governed by Zugbie v. J. R. Whipple Co. 230 Mass: 19, Sheehan v. Holland, 231 Mass. 246, Towne v. Waltham Watch Co. 247 Mass. 390, O'Brien v. Boston Elevated Railway, 250 Mass. 192, and Mascary v. Boston Elevated Railway, 258 Mass. 524.
Exceptions sustained.
Judgment for defendant.