Case Name: Scott SCHUTZA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COURTESY CHEVROLET CENTER, a California Corporation, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-07-10
Citations: 693 F. App'x 625
Docket Number: No. 15-55631
Parties: Scott SCHUTZA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COURTESY CHEVROLET CENTER, a California Corporation, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before: GRABER, BYBEE, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 693
Pages: 625–626

Head Matter:
Scott SCHUTZA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COURTESY CHEVROLET CENTER, a California Corporation, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 15-55631
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted February 6, 2017 Pasadena, California
Filed July 10, 2017
Russell Clive Handy, Esquire, Mark D. Potter, Esquire, Potter Handy LLP, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant
Scot Claus, Dickinson Wright/Mariscal Weeks, Phoenix, AZ, Lann G. McIntyre, Esquire, Attorney, Lewis Brisbois Bis-gaard <& Smith LLP, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellee
Christopher Chen-Hsin Wang, Attorney, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division/Appellate Section, Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae United States of America
Before: GRABER, BYBEE, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes that this case is suitable for decision without oral argument, Fed. R. App, P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
We vacate th'e district court's dismissal of this action, and we remand for reconsideration in light of Karczewski v. DCH Mission Valley, LLC, No. 15-55633.
VACATED and REMANDED. Costs on appeal awarded to Plaintiff.
BYBEE, Circuit Judge,
acquiescing dubitante:
I acquiesce dubitante for the reasons articulated in my separate opinion in Karczewski v. DCH Mission Valley, LLC, No. 15-55633.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.