Case Name: John McGHEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee, and Federal Bureau of Prisons; Bryan Moon; M. Lee; G. Ortiz; Robin Hunter-Busker; Nurse Scott, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-07-23
Citations: 535 F. App'x 227
Docket Number: No. 13-6514
Parties: John McGHEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee, and Federal Bureau of Prisons; Bryan Moon; M. Lee; G. Ortiz; Robin Hunter-Busker; Nurse Scott, Defendants.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 535
Pages: 227–227

Head Matter:
John McGHEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee, and Federal Bureau of Prisons; Bryan Moon; M. Lee; G. Ortiz; Robin Hunter-Busker; Nurse Scott, Defendants.
No. 13-6514.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 18, 2013.
Decided: July 23, 2013.
John McGhee, Appellant pro se. David T. Huband, Christina Ann Kelley, Bureau of Prisons, Butner, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
John McGhee appeals the district court's order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1346(b)(1), 2671-2680 (West 2006 & Supp.2013). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McGhee v. United States, No. 5:09-et-03192-BO, 2013 WL 1246851 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 26, 2013). No judge of the en banc court requested a poll on McGhee's motion for en banc hearing. Accordingly, the motion is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.