Case Name: Robert LUISI, et al., Petitioners, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1994-10-27
Citations: 644 So. 2d 87
Docket Number: No. 82067
Parties: Robert LUISI, et al., Petitioners, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 644
Pages: 87–88

Head Matter:
Robert LUISI, et al., Petitioners, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 82067.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Oct. 27, 1994.
Alan H. Schreiber, Public Defender, and Stacey J. Pastel, Asst. Public Defender, Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Richard L. Rosen-baum of Law Offices of Richard L. Rosen-baum, Fort Lauderdale, and Rhonda Rogers of Law Offices of Rhonda Rogers, Hollywood, for petitioners.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Joan Fowler, Sr. Asst. Atty. Gen., and James J. Carney, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have for review State v. Luisi, 619 So.2d 308 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993), which certified the same questions of great public importance we answered in Carino v. State, 635 So.2d 9 (Fla.1994). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. Based on the answers provided in Carino, the decision below is approved.
It is so ordered.
GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.