Case Name: FIRST NAT. BANK OF BRIDGEPORT v. AIKEN et ux.
Court: Supreme Court of Texas
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1918-12-02
Citations: 206 S.W. 928
Docket Number: No. 3076
Parties: FIRST NAT. BANK OF BRIDGEPORT v. AIKEN et ux.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 206
Pages: 928–928

Head Matter:
FIRST NAT. BANK OF BRIDGEPORT v. AIKEN et ux.
(No. 3076.)
(Supreme Court of Texas.
Dec. 2, 1918.)
Error to Court of Civil Appeals of Second Supreme Judicial District.
Action by the First National Bank of Bridgeport against W. J. Aiken and wife. Judgment for plaintiff by default was reformed and affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals (198 S. W. 1017), and plaintiff brings error.
Affirmed.
McMurray & Gettys, of Decatur, and H. E. Lobdell, of Bridgeport, for plaintiff in error.
Bumpass & Crumbaugh, of Terrell, for defendants in error.

Opinion:
PHILLIPS, O. J.
This case is ruled by the decision in Rod River National Bank v. Ferguson, 206 S. W. 923, the question presented being the same.
The judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals is affirmed.