Case Name: MORTON'S MARKET, INC.; J & J Produce and Deli, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GUSTAFSON'S DAIRY, INC., Defendant, Borden, Inc.; T.G. Lee Foods, Inc., et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2000-05-05
Citations: 211 F.3d 1224
Docket Number: No. 98-2498
Parties: MORTON’S MARKET, INC.; J & J Produce and Deli, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GUSTAFSON’S DAIRY, INC., Defendant, Borden, Inc.; T.G. Lee Foods, Inc., et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, HILL, Senior Circuit Judge, and COOK , Senior District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 211
Pages: 1224–1224

Head Matter:
MORTON’S MARKET, INC.; J & J Produce and Deli, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GUSTAFSON’S DAIRY, INC., Defendant, Borden, Inc.; T.G. Lee Foods, Inc., et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 98-2498.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
May 5, 2000.
Leonard Egan, Washington, DC, Joel C. Meredith, Daniel B. Allanoff, Meredith, Cohen, Greenfogel & Skirnick, Philadelphia, PA, Michael J. Freed, Much Shelist Freed Denenberg & Ament, P.C., Chicago, IL, Morris Weinberg, Jr., Zuckerman, Spaeder, Taylor & Evans, Tampa, FL, for Morton’s Market, Inc.
Carey P. DeDeyn, Patricia B. Cunningham, Sutherland, Asbill & Brennan, Atlanta, GA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, HILL, Senior Circuit Judge, and COOK , Senior District Judge.
Honorable Julian Abele Cook, Jr., Senior U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
BY THE COURT:
This case is before the court upon plaintiffs Motion for Clarification, filed on January 10, 2000. Defendant Pet, Inc. filed its response on January 20, 2000. The motion is GRANTED to the following extent: the Clerk is directed to amend the opinion entered in this case on December 20, 1999, and published at 198 F.3d 823 by (1) adding a phrase and a sentence to the end of the second sentence in Part III, which shall read as follows:
As to Pet, we hold that it effectively withdrew from the conspiracy in 1985 and, as to it, these actions are not timely-filed unless the statute was equitably tolled by fraudulent concealment. If so, Pet would be liable for any price-fixing activity prior to its withdrawal.
and (2) amending the holding, which now reads "AFFIRM IN PART, REVERSE IN PART and REMAND" to "REVERSE and REMAND," all as shown on pages 839-40 of the opinion. The motion is DENIED in all other respects.