Case Name: Ladale HOWARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-12-08
Citations: 627 So. 2d 605
Docket Number: No. 93-02162
Parties: Ladale HOWARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SCHOONOVER, AC.J., and PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 627
Pages: 605–605

Head Matter:
Ladale HOWARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 93-02162.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Dec. 8, 1993.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The denial of the defendant's motion for belated appeal is affirmed without prejudice to a timely, successive motion for belated appeal containing the necessary allegations under oath. See Gilliam v. State, 611 So.2d 90 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).
SCHOONOVER, AC.J., and PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.