Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Noel BRAVO-SOSA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-08-17
Citations: 144 F. App'x 658
Docket Number: No. 03-10510
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Noel BRAVO-SOSA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: KLEINFELD, TASHIMA, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 144
Pages: 658–659

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Noel BRAVO-SOSA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 03-10510.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 14, 2004.
Decided Aug. 17, 2005.
Thomas E. Flynn, AUSA, USSAC—Office of the U.S. Attorney, Sacramento, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Lindsay Anne Weston, Esq., Lindsay A. Weston Attorney at Law, Davis, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: KLEINFELD, TASHIMA, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
ORDER and MEMORANDUM
The Memorandum Disposition filed on October 22, 2004, is WITHDRAWN and replaced with the following Memorandum Disposition:
Noel Bravo-Sosa appeals the 293-month sentence imposed following his jury-trial conviction for three counts of distribution of cocaine and one count of possession with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
We remand for the limited purpose of allowing the district court to determine whether the district court would have imposed a materially different sentence had it known that the Guidelines were advisory rather than mandatory. See United States v. Hermoso-Garcia, 413 F.3d 1085, 1089-90 (9th Cir.2005).
REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.