Case Name: McCULLOUGH, Respondent, v. McCULLOUGH, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1972-07-27
Citations: 10 Or. App. 502
Docket Number: No. 366-836
Parties: McCULLOUGH, Respondent, v. McCULLOUGH, Appellant.
Judges: Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Langtry and Thornton, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 10
Pages: 502–503

Head Matter:
Submitted on briefs July 11,
affirmed July 27,
petition for rehearing denied September 14, 1972
McCULLOUGH, Respondent, v. McCULLOUGH, Appellant.
(No. 366-836)
499 P2d 832
Otis E. McCullough, Portland, filed the brief pro se.
No appearance by respondent.
Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Langtry and Thornton, Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This case has been submitted on a brief prepared and personally filed by the defendant husband. The plaintiff wife has not answered. We have a transcript and a complete record before us which we have thoroughly reviewed. The trial court made a decree granting a divorce to the plaintiff, distributing the property in what we consider to be an equitable manner, and requiring the defendant to pay $100 per month alimony. They were married for nine years. She is 61 years old and disabled and he is about five years younger, and earning around $400 per month, plus receiving $70 per month as a veterans' pension. Our review of the record indicates that the court's decree was reasonable.
Affirmed.