Case Name: HILTON INTERNATIONAL CO., etc., et al., Appellants, v. ROBOBAR, INC., etc., et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1997-02-26
Citations: 689 So. 2d 1149
Docket Number: No. 96-1511
Parties: HILTON INTERNATIONAL CO., etc., et al., Appellants, v. ROBOBAR, INC., etc., et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before NESBITT, GODERICH and SORONDO, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 689
Pages: 1149–1150

Head Matter:
HILTON INTERNATIONAL CO., etc., et al., Appellants, v. ROBOBAR, INC., etc., et al., Appellees.
No. 96-1511.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 26, 1997.
Rehearing Denied April 9, 1997.
Anderson, Moss, Sherouse & Petros; Hicks, Anderson & Blum and lia J. Klion, Miami, for appellants.
Armstrong & Mejer and Timothy Armstrong, Coral Gables, for appellees.
Before NESBITT, GODERICH and SORONDO, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Hyatt Corp. v. Howarth, 678 So.2d 823, 824 n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)("We may not, under the abuse of discretion standard, simply supplant [the trial court's decision to either grant or deny a motion to dismiss on forum non conveniens grounds] with this court's preference on a de novo review of the same venue factors.").