Case Name: M.W., a Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-04-24
Citations: 596 So. 2d 534
Docket Number: No. 91-1365
Parties: M.W., a Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: GOSHORN, C.J., and COBB and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 596
Pages: 534–534

Head Matter:
M.W., a Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 91-1365.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
April 24, 1992.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Lyle R. Hitchens, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and John W. Foster, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We agree with the defendant that the circumstantial evidence presented by the state on the grand theft count failed to exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence and will not support the conviction. However, the record supports the defendant's conviction for dealing in stolen property.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.
GOSHORN, C.J., and COBB and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.