Case Name: MEAD v. MEAD
Court: Michigan Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Michigan
Decision Date: 1902-06-27
Citations: 131 Mich. 309
Docket Number: Docket No. 28
Parties: MEAD v. MEAD.
Judges: Moore, Grant, and Montgomery, JJ., concurred. Long, J., did not sit.
Reporter: Michigan Reports
Volume: 131
Pages: 309–309

Head Matter:
MEAD v. MEAD.
Divorce — Evidence—Appeal.
A decree dismissing a bill for divorce, held to have been justified by the testimony.
Appeal from Calhoun; Winsor, J.
Submitted June 6, 1902.
(Docket No. 28.)
Decided June 27, 1902.
Bill by Sarah A. Mead against Carey A. Mead for a divorce. From a decree dismissing the bill, complainant appeals.
Affirmed.
Miller & Miller (Clement Smith, of counsel), for complainant.

Opinion:
Hooker, C. J.
We are of the opinion that the decree of the learned circuit judge, dismissing the complainant's bill, was justified by the testimony, and should not be dis-' turbed. As the case involves no disputed question of law, it is unnecessary to say more.
The decree is affirmed.
Moore, Grant, and Montgomery, JJ., concurred. Long, J., did not sit.