Case Name: Timothy PORTER v. Peter SANGILLO d/b/a Mutual Building and Construction Company
Court: Maine Supreme Judicial Court
Jurisdiction: Maine
Decision Date: 1981-12-07
Citations: 437 A.2d 855
Docket Number: 
Parties: Timothy PORTER v. Peter SANGILLO d/b/a Mutual Building and Construction Company.
Judges: Before McKUSICK, C. J., and GOD-FREY, NICHOLS, ROBERTS, CARTER, VIOLETTE and WATHEN, JJ.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 437
Pages: 855–855

Head Matter:
Timothy PORTER v. Peter SANGILLO d/b/a Mutual Building and Construction Company.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.
Argued Sept. 17, 1981.
Decided Dec. 7, 1981.
Kim Matthews (orally), Portland, for plaintiff.
Robert A. Burgess, Rae Ann French, Asst. Attys. Gen., Consumer and Antitrust Division, Augusta, amicus curiae.
Robert A. Cohen, Portland, for defendant.
Before McKUSICK, C. J., and GOD-FREY, NICHOLS, ROBERTS, CARTER, VIOLETTE and WATHEN, JJ.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
In the second count of his complaint the Plaintiff asserted that under 11 M.R.S.A. § 2-316(5)(a) the Defendant's sale to him of materials and labor to insulate the walls of the Plaintiff's home not only breached an implied warranty but also constituted a per se violation of the Unfair Trade Practices Act. Our recent opinion in State v. Ford Motor Company, Me., 436 A.2d 866 (1981) addressed this issue and is controlling here.
The entry is:
Appeal denied.
Judgment affirmed.
All concurring.