Case Name: Hungerford v. State
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2010-04-14
Citations: 124 Ohio St. 3d 1539
Docket Number: 2010-0291
Parties: Hungerford v. State.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., would not accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. X.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 124
Pages: 1539–1539

Head Matter:
2010-0291.
Hungerford v. State.

Opinion:
Lake App. No. 2008-L-073, 2009-Ohio-6997. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I-IV, VII, IX, and X; cause held for the decision in 2008-2502, State v. Bodyke, Huron App. Nos. H-07-040, H-07-041, and H-07-042, 2008-Ohio-6387; and briefing schedule stayed.
Moyer, C.J., would not accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. X.
Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, and O'Donnell, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. V, VI, and VIII.
O'Connor and Cupp, JJ., would not accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. VII.
Lanzinger, J., not participating.