Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Keith BILLINGSLEY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-03-09
Citations: 315 F. App'x 457
Docket Number: No. 08-8609
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Keith BILLINGSLEY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 315
Pages: 457–458

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Keith BILLINGSLEY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-8609.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 26, 2009.
Decided: March 9, 2009.
Keith Billingsley, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Leo Fahey, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appel-lee.
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Keith Billingsley appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Billingsley, No. 1:03-cr-00395-JCC-3 (E.D.Va., Dec. 2, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.