Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Clyde TOLLIVER, Appellant; Clyde TOLLIVER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-03-14
Citations: 895 S.W.2d 262
Docket Number: Nos. 64862, 66329
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Clyde TOLLIVER, Appellant. Clyde TOLLIVER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before REINHARD, P.J., GRIMM, C.J., and CRAHAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 895
Pages: 262–262

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Clyde TOLLIVER, Appellant. Clyde TOLLIVER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 64862, 66329.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
March 14, 1995.
Talat M. Bashir, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Becky Owenson Kilpatrick, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before REINHARD, P.J., GRIMM, C.J., and CRAHAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals following his conviction by a jury of two counts of abuse of a child, § 568.060 RSMo Cum.Supp.1993. Defendant was sentenced to seven years imprisonment on each count to be served concurrently. Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Defendant, however, has abandoned that appeal by failing to brief any errors pertaining to the denial of post-conviction relief.
All of the points raised in Defendant's direct appeal pertain to evidentiary rulings by the trial court. We find no abuse of discretion or plain error. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).