Case Name: Donald Weingart, Respondent, v. Directoire Restaurant, Inc., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1973-11-13
Citations: 75 Misc. 2d 1004
Docket Number: 
Parties: Donald Weingart, Respondent, v. Directoire Restaurant, Inc., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 75
Pages: 1004–1004

Head Matter:
Donald Weingart, Respondent, v. Directoire Restaurant, Inc., Appellant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
November 13, 1973.
Glatzer, Glatzer & Davis (Harold Glatzer of counsel), for appellant. Williamson <& Williamson (Kenneth Williamson, Martin I. Samuels and Paul Heyman of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The agreed statement of facts was insufficient to permit a determination of the issues. The express, implied or apparent authority of Buster Douglas, and the question of whether plaintiff acted with reasonable prudence are matters which should be fully explored at a trial.
The judgment should be reversed and new trial ordered with ~$30 costs to abide the event; appeal from decision dismissed.
Concur — Fine, J. P., Lupiano and Quinn, JJ.
Judgment reversed, etc.