Case Name: NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. WRENCH PRESS, LLC, Defendant/Respondent, and Petar Grgic and Biscrica Grgic, Defendants/Appellants, and Edwin-Claude, Inc., Defendant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2017-03-14
Citations: 513 S.W.3d 384
Docket Number: No. ED 104721
Parties: NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. WRENCH PRESS, LLC, Defendant/Respondent, and Petar Grgic and Biscrica Grgic, Defendants/Appellants, and Edwin-Claude, Inc., Defendant.
Judges: Before Philip M. Hess, C.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 513
Pages: 384–385

Head Matter:
NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. WRENCH PRESS, LLC, Defendant/Respondent, and Petar Grgic and Biscrica Grgic, Defendants/Appellants, and Edwin-Claude, Inc., Defendant.
No. ED 104721
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FIVE.
Filed: March 14, 2017
Richard K. Dowd, St. Louis, MO, for appellants.
Stephen G. Bell, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before Philip M. Hess, C.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
In this interpleader action brought by Nautilus Insurance Company regarding certain insurance proceeds, defendants Pe-tar and Biscrica Grgic appeal the trial court's determination that defendant Wrench Press, LLC, was the only defendant entitled to the interpleaded funds. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(5).