Case Name: Peter Madjorous v. State of Ohio
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1925
Citations: 3 Ohio Law Abs. 660
Docket Number: No. 19118
Parties: Peter Madjorous v. State of Ohio.
Judges: Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen and Kinkade, JJ., concur. Robinson, J., not participating.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 3
Pages: 660–660

Head Matter:
No. 889
No. 19118
Peter Madjorous v. State of Ohio.
Error to the Court of Appeals of Summit county.
531. FINES—Prohibition against remission of, is valid exercise of legislative power, and does not invalidate the operative provisions of 6212-17 GC.

Opinion:
MARSHALL, C. J.
The prohibition against remission of fines and suspension of sentence provided in section 6212-17, General Code, is a valid exercise of legislative power and does not invalidate the operative provisions of that section.
Judgment affirmed.
Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen and Kinkade, JJ., concur. Robinson, J., not participating.