Case Name: Harvey LAURIA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-12-08
Citations: 210 F. App'x 616
Docket Number: No. 05-55282
Parties: Harvey LAURIA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before: GOODWIN, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 210
Pages: 616–617

Head Matter:
Harvey LAURIA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 05-55282.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 4, 2006.
Filed Dec. 08, 2006.
Harvey Lauria, Los Angeles, CA, pro se.
Thomas Quinn, Esq., Nokes, Davis, & Quinn, Laguna Beach, CA, Lewis P. Per-ling, Esq., Kilpatrick Stockton, LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before: GOODWIN, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Harvey Lauria appeals pro se the grant of an unopposed motion for summary judgment in favor of Equifax Information Services, LLC. We review the grant of summary judgment de novo. See Buono v. Norton, 371 F.3d 543, 545 (9th Cir.2004). We affirm. Equifax met its burden to show that there was an absence of evidence to support Lauria's claim of negligent and willful violation of the California Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act, Cal. Civil Code § 1785.1 et seq. See Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 2553, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986). Lauria failed to present specific admissible evidence to create a genuine issue of material fact for trial. Id., 477 U.S. at 324, 106 S.Ct. at 2553.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.