Case Name: Berton K. CURTIS, Appellant, v. Lawton CHILES, etc., et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-03-02
Citations: 594 So. 2d 858
Docket Number: No. 91-1561
Parties: Berton K. CURTIS, Appellant, v. Lawton CHILES, etc., et al., Appellees.
Judges: WIGGINTON, BARFIELD and WOLF, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 594
Pages: 858–858

Head Matter:
Berton K. CURTIS, Appellant, v. Lawton CHILES, etc., et al., Appellees.
No. 91-1561.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
March 2, 1992.
Berton K. Curtis, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Gypsy Bailey, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court's denial of the petition for writ of habeas corpus, because the grounds for relief asserted in the petition should have been presented to the trial court in a timely filed motion for post-conviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See State v. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District, 569 So.2d 439 (Fla.1990); Mack v. State, 586 So.2d 1266 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Hickman v. State, 581 So.2d 942 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Washington v. State, 576 So.2d 973 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).
WIGGINTON, BARFIELD and WOLF, JJ., concur.