Case Name: Lorraine HESSLER, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Robert Hessler, Appellant, v. T & N, PLC, f/k/a Turner & Newall, pic, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1994-10-05
Citations: 642 So. 2d 851
Docket Number: No. 93-2834
Parties: Lorraine HESSLER, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Robert Hessler, Appellant, v. T & N, PLC, f/k/a Turner & Newall, pic, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and LEVY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 642
Pages: 851–851

Head Matter:
Lorraine HESSLER, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Robert Hessler, Appellant, v. T & N, PLC, f/k/a Turner & Newall, pic, Appellee.
No. 93-2834.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 5, 1994.
David M. Lipman and Daniel A. Brown, Miami, for appellant.
Spohrer Wilner & Maxwell and Norwood S. Wilner, Jacksonville, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and LEVY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellant has failed to demonstrate error or abuse of discretion in (a) the trial court's exclusion of proposed rebuttal testimony, see Rhodes v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co., 528 So.2d 459 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Driscoll v. Morris, 114 So.2d 314 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959), or (b) any ruling as to the elements of the plaintiff's strict liability claim. See Gideon v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 761 F.2d 1129 (5th Cir.1985).
Affirmed.