Case Name: JOHN S. KINSEY, RESPONDENT, v. SOLOMON BUTZ ET AL., APPELLANTS
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1926-10-18
Citations: 103 N.J.L. 197
Docket Number: 
Parties: JOHN S. KINSEY, RESPONDENT, v. SOLOMON BUTZ ET AL., APPELLANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 103
Pages: 197–197

Head Matter:
JOHN S. KINSEY, RESPONDENT, v. SOLOMON BUTZ ET AL., APPELLANTS.
Submitted May 28, 1926
Decided October 18, 1926.
For the appellants, William, P. Braun.
For the respondent, William C. Gebhardt & Son.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trenchard, Kalisch, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.