Case Name: Mike Mason v. The State
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1937-10-13
Citations: 133 Tex. Crim. 366
Docket Number: No. 18911
Parties: Mike Mason v. The State.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Criminal Reports
Volume: 133
Pages: 366–367

Head Matter:
Mike Mason v. The State.
No. 18911.
Delivered October 13, 1937.
Rehearing Denied December 15, 1937.
The opinion states the case.
Sam J. Hamilton, of Memphis, and Mahan & Broughton, of Childress, for appellant.
Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Attorney, of Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
LATTIMORE, Judge. —
Conviction for violating the Liquor Control Act; punishment, a fine of $350.00 and three months confinement in the county jail.
We are of opinion that the statement in the complaint of the fact that the commissioners court made its order prohibiting the sale of intoxicating liquor in Hall County, after canvassing the vote of the citizens of said county in a local option election held in September, 1911, is a sufficient statement of the fact that the result of said election was to prohibit such sale.
The other, questions raised on this appeal were disposed of in our opinion in the case of Baker v. State, 106 S. W. (2d) 308, followed and approved by Parker v. State, 106 S. W. (2d) 313, and Morris v. State, 106 S. W. (2d) 314.
The other complaint of the - refusal of the court to submit to the jury the question as to whether certain State witnesses were accomplices is disposed of adversely to appellant's com tent!bit'liban opinion in Stevens v. State, No. 18823, this day handed down (page 333 of this volume).
Finding no error in the record, the judgment of the trial court is aifirnied.
Affirmed.