Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rodolfo ESQUIVEL-JUAREZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-02-24
Citations: 169 F. App'x 338
Docket Number: No. 04-41117
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rodolfo ESQUIVEL-JUAREZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 169
Pages: 338–338

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rodolfo ESQUIVEL-JUAREZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 04-41117.
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Decided Feb. 24, 2006.
James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, H. Michael Sokolow, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, Rodolfo Esquivel-Juarez, Three Rivers, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Counsel appointed to represent Rodolfo Esquivel-Juarez on appeal from the revocation of supervised release has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Esquivel-Juarez was notified of counsel's request but has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities in this case, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.