Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Johnny Noe APARICIOABARCA, also known as Johnny Noe Aparcio, also known as Jonny Noe Aparicio-Abarea, also known as Jonny Noe Aparicio, also known as Johnny Noe Aparcio-Abarca, also known as Jonny Noe Aparicio Abarca, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-10-22
Citations: 620 F. App'x 313
Docket Number: No. 14-41223
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Johnny Noe APARICIOABARCA, also known as Johnny Noe Aparcio, also known as Jonny Noe Aparicio-Abarea, also known as Jonny Noe Aparicio, also known as Johnny Noe Aparcio-Abarca, also known as Jonny Noe Aparicio Abarca, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 620
Pages: 313–314

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Johnny Noe APARICIOABARCA, also known as Johnny Noe Aparcio, also known as Jonny Noe Aparicio-Abarea, also known as Jonny Noe Aparicio, also known as Johnny Noe Aparcio-Abarca, also known as Jonny Noe Aparicio Abarca, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 14-41223
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Oct. 22, 2015.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Philip G. Gallagher, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Johnny Noe Aparicioabarca has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Apar-icioabarca has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Aparicioabarca's response. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. If Aparicioabarca wishes to challenge the Attorney General's decision regarding the calculation of his sentence, he must first exhaust his administrative remedies through the Bureau of Prisons and then may file a habeas corpus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. See United States v. Gabor, 905 F.2d 76, 78 (5th Cir.1990). Counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.