Case Name: Charles CLARK et al., Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1973-04-03
Citations: 275 So. 2d 571
Docket Number: No. 72-726
Parties: Charles CLARK et al., Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ., and SACK, MARTIN, Associate Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 275
Pages: 571–572

Head Matter:
Charles CLARK et al., Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 72-726.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 3, 1973.
Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender and John Lipinski, Asst. Public Defender, for appellants.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ., and SACK, MARTIN, Associate Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
These appellants were tried jointly and found guilty of robbery by a jury. They were each sentenced to a term of twenty years in the State Penitentiary.
lt is their contention on appeal that the trial court erred in denying their motions for a mistrial and a severance.
We have carefully considered appellants' points in the light of the record on appeal and briefs and have concluded that they are without merit and that no reversible error has been made to appear. Kelly v. State, Fla.App.1967, 202 So.2d 901; Reis v. State, Fla.App.1971, 248 So.2d 666; Woodside v. State, Fla.App.1968, 206 So.2d 426; Washington v. State, Fla.App. 1968, 210 So.2d 290.
Affirmed.