Case Name: Thomas L. Fenn vs. William H. Fenn, Edward D. Noyes, Horace Manning, Trustees et als.
Court: Maine Supreme Judicial Court
Jurisdiction: Maine
Decision Date: 1931-07-30
Citations: 130 Me. 520
Docket Number: 
Parties: Thomas L. Fenn vs. William H. Fenn, Edward D. Noyes, Horace Manning, Trustees et als.
Judges: 
Reporter: Maine Reports
Volume: 130
Pages: 520–521

Head Matter:
Thomas L. Fenn vs. William H. Fenn, Edward D. Noyes, Horace Manning, Trustees et als.
Cumberland County.
Decided July 30, 1931.

Opinion:
This report of this cause in equity, brought to obtain a construction of the will of William H. Fenn, late of Portland, Maine, deceased, must be discharged. Of the thirty-seven defendants, individual and representative, sixteen only appear, answer and agree to this report. Twenty-one defendants failed to appear, the bill is taken pro confesso against them and the cause reported without their agreement.
George C. Otto and Frederick R. Dyer, for plaintiff.
John F. Dana, Eugene L. Bodge, John B. Kehoe, for defendants.
This Law Court has jurisdiction to determine causes in equity certified on report only when the presiding Justice is of opinion, and so certifies, that a question of law is involved of sufficient importance or doubt to justify the same, and the parties agree thereto. R. S., Chap. 91, Sec. 56; Baker v. Johnson, 41 Me., 15; Whittemore v. Russell, 78 Me., 337. Defendants in default in an equity action under a decree pro confesso are still parties and have some rights. Unless all parties agree to a report of the cause in which they are joined, we think it is the duty of the sitting Justice to hear the evidence and make such rules, orders or decrees thereon as the law of the case requires. Under this procedure, any party aggrieved has the right of exception and appeal reserved to him and the rights of all other parties are left unimpaired. Report discharged.