Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Craig Allen LADWIG, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-01-27
Citations: 435 F.3d 1147
Docket Number: No. 04-30393
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Craig Allen LADWIG, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before GOULD and BERZON, Circuit Judges, and SCHWARZER, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 435
Pages: 1147–1148

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Craig Allen LADWIG, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 04-30393.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Jan. 27, 2006.
Stephanie J. Lister, Esq., USSP — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Spokane, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Christina L. Hunt, Esq., FPDWA — Federal Public Defender’s Office, Spokane, WA, for Defendanb-Appellant.
Before GOULD and BERZON, Circuit Judges, and SCHWARZER, District Judge.
The Honorable William W Schwarzer, Senior United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
ORDER
In our opinion of December 27, 2005, we retained jurisdiction and directed the parties to provide supplemental briefing on whether either wished to pursue a limited remand under United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). Because both parties have responded that they do not seek an Ameline remand, and other sentencing issues were resolved in our prior opinion, we now AFFIRM Lad-wig's sentence, and direct the Clerk to issue the mandate after the time for filing a Petition for Rehearing or Petition for Rehearing En Banc has expired.