Case Name: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner v. TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 408, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS OF AMERICA, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1962-05-16
Citations: 303 F.2d 444
Docket Number: No. 13747
Parties: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner v. TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 408, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS OF AMERICA, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 303
Pages: 444–445

Head Matter:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner v. TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 408, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS OF AMERICA, Respondent.
No. 13747.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued May 14, 1962.
Decided May 16, 1962.
Melvin Welles, Washington, D. C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Ass. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Jules H. Gordon, Atty., N. L. R. B., on the brief), for petitioner.
Hugh J. Beins, Washington, D. C. (Andrew Zazzali, Newark, N. J., on the brief), for respondent.
Before KALODNER, HASTIE and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The order of the National Labor Relations Board that we are asked to enforce in this case is, in technical contemplation, sufficiently supported by the evidence, though the apparently minimal public or even private significance of the violation evokes wonder that so much has been made of so little. Since we have no authority to impose a rule de minimis upon the Board, the order will be enforced.