Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Zachary T. Guerin, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2017-02-09
Citations: 28 N.Y.3d 1152
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Zachary T. Guerin, Appellant.
Judges: Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia concur; Judge Wilson taking no part.
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 28
Pages: 1152–1153

Head Matter:
[71 NE3d 555, 49 NYS3d 64]
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Zachary T. Guerin, Appellant.
Submitted January 10, 2017;
decided February 9, 2017
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Zachary T Guerin, appellant pro se.
Lori P. Rieman, District Attorney, Little Valley (William Preston Marshall of counsel), and Musacchio & Pyle, Esqs., Gowanda (James A. Musacchio of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the County Court should be affirmed.
Defendant Zachary T. Guerin challenges his conviction for trespassing on private property in violation of Environmental Conservation Law § 11-2113 (1). The law requires that the property be posted with warning signs bearing the name and address of the property owner (ECL 11-2111 [2]). Since defendant did not raise below his specific challenge that the People's evidence of the location of 32 compliant signs is deficient, this claim is unpreserved and beyond our review (see People v Hines, 97 NY2d 56, 62 [2001]). To the extent defendant argues that evidence of one noncompliant sign undermined the People's case, the claim is similarly not within our powers of review (CPL 470.15 [5]; People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 349 [2007]).
Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia concur; Judge Wilson taking no part.
Order affirmed, in a memorandum.
Includes only applications that were granted.