Case Name: Justin L. WILLIAMS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2017-11-07
Citations: 535 S.W.3d 761
Docket Number: ED 104763
Parties: Justin L. WILLIAMS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 535
Pages: 761–761

Head Matter:
Justin L. WILLIAMS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
ED 104763
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Filed: November 7, 2017
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied December 19, 2017
Kevin B. Gau, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 68101, For Mov-ant/Appellant.
Karen L. Kramer, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 66102, For Respondent/Respondent.
Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Justin L. Williams appeals from the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing on one of two claims. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k); Little v. State, 427 S.W.3d 846, 850 (Mo. App. E.D. 2014). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the decision pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. 2014, unless otherwise indicated.