Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fausto MEDINA-MEZA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-11-21
Citations: 300 F. App'x 590
Docket Number: No. 07-10412
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Fausto MEDINA-MEZA, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 300
Pages: 590–591

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Fausto MEDINA-MEZA, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 07-10412.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 13, 2008.
Filed Nov. 21, 2008.
Lynne Ingram, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Nancy L. Hinchcliffe, Esquire, Phoenix, AZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Fausto Medina-Meza, Florence, AZ, pro se.
Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Fausto Medina-Meza appeals from the 120-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(l)(A)(vii), and 846. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we dismiss.
Medina-Meza contends the appeal waiver in his plea agreement is not enforceable because his sentence is not consistent with the plea agreement. We conclude that the appeal waiver is enforceable, and we dismiss this appeal. See United States v. Navarro-Botello, 912 F.2d 318, 321 (9th Cir.1990); see also United States v. Franco-Lopez, 312 F.3d 984, 991 (9th Cir.2002).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.