Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MONTE SHANE SMITH, aka Shane Monte Smith, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2008-09-10
Citations: 222 Or. App. 325
Docket Number: CFH050267; A133878
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MONTE SHANE SMITH, aka Shane Monte Smith, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Armstrong, Judge, and Rosenblum, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 222
Pages: 325–326

Head Matter:
Submitted August 1,
reversed and remanded September 10, 2008
STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MONTE SHANE SMITH, aka Shane Monte Smith, Defendant-Appellant.
Umatilla County Circuit Court
CFH050267; A133878
193 P3d 61
Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, Legal Services Division, and Anne F. Munsey, Senior Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Karla H. Ferrall, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Armstrong, Judge, and Rosenblum, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance, former ORS 475.992(4) (2003), renumbered as ORS 475.840(3) (2005), arguing that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence a laboratory report pursuant to ORS 475.235 identifying as methamphetamine a substance found during a search of defendant. In this case, the laboratory report was the only evidence admitted at trial concerning the nature of the substance. The state concedes that defendant is entitled to a reversal in light of the holding of State v. Birchfield, 342 Or 624, 157 P3d 216 (2007). We agree and accept the state's concession.
Reversed and remanded.