Case Name: The STATE, Respondent, v. Vance Alexander CURLEY and James Pearson, Appellants
Court: Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jurisdiction: South Carolina
Decision Date: 1971-10-20
Citations: 257 S.C. 68
Docket Number: 19002
Parties: The STATE, Respondent, v. Vance Alexander CURLEY and James Pearson, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Carolina Reports
Volume: 257
Pages: 68–69

Head Matter:
19002
The STATE, Respondent, v. Vance Alexander CURLEY and James Pearson, Appellants.
(184 S. E. (2d) 80)
Messrs. Dusenbury & Dusenbury, of Florence for appellants.
Messrs. Daniel R. McLeod, Atty. Gen., and Emmett H. Clair and Robert H. Hood, Asst. Attys. Gen. of Columbia, and Solicitqr T. Kenneth Summerford, of Florence, for respondent.
October 20, 1971.

Opinion:
ORDER
Per Curiam :
It having been determined by the Circuit Court, after an evidentiary hearing conforming with the judgment of this Court heretofore filed (253 S. C. 513, 171 S. E. (2d) 699), that the appellant, Pearson, after receiving the benefit of the procedural safeguards required by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436, 86 S. Ct. 1602, 16 L. Ed. (2d) 694, with respect to the evidence admitted against him, voluntarily and intelligently waived his privilege against self-incrimination, said appellant's conviction is, therefore, affirmed.