Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Horacio AVILES-DELGADO, aka Cirilo Santa Maria-Martinez, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-12-12
Citations: 158 F. App'x 57
Docket Number: No. 05-10127
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Horacio AVILES-DELGADO, aka Cirilo Santa Maria-Martinez, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: GOODWIN, W. FLETCHER, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 158
Pages: 57–57

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Horacio AVILES-DELGADO, aka Cirilo Santa Maria-Martinez, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 05-10127.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 5, 2005.
Decided Dec. 12, 2005.
Robert A. Bork, Esq., USLV-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Arthur L. Allen, Esq., FPDNV-Federal Public Defender’s Office, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: GOODWIN, W. FLETCHER, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Horacio Aviles-Delgado appeals from his sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for unlawful reentry of deported alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).
Aviles-Delgado contends that the district court violated his constitutional rights in enhancing his sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) and § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C) of the advisory Sentencing Guidelines based on prior criminal convictions that were neither proved beyond a reasonable doubt to a jury nor admitted as part of the guilty plea and that Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), is no longer good law. This contention is foreclosed by United States v. Weiland, 420 F.3d 1062, 1079 n. 16 (9th Cir.2005).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.