Case Name: ANTONIO GRANDI ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. NICOLA BRUNETTI, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1917-03-15
Citations: 90 N.J.L. 679
Docket Number: 
Parties: ANTONIO GRANDI ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. NICOLA BRUNETTI, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 90
Pages: 679–679

Head Matter:
ANTONIO GRANDI ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. NICOLA BRUNETTI, APPELLANT.
Argued March 15, 1917
Decided March 15, 1917.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, in which the following per curiam was filed:
“The reasons for appeal present for our determination either matters of fact, which are not brought before us for consideration on a merely appellate proceeding, or matters of law which have long been settled in this state, and settled adversely to the contention of appellant’s counsel.
“The judgment under review will be affirmed.”
For the respondents, Themistocles M. Ungaro.
For the appellant, Gaelano M. Belfatto.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment tinder review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Bergen, Minturn, Kaltscit, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, JJ. 10.
For reversal—TSTone.