Case Name: BOROUGH OF NEW SHREWSBURY, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. BLOCK 105, LOT 11, ET ALS., DEFENDANTS, AND HERBERT HARVEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1970-10-07
Citations: 111 N.J. Super. 550
Docket Number: 
Parties: BOROUGH OF NEW SHREWSBURY, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. BLOCK 105, LOT 11, ET ALS., DEFENDANTS, AND HERBERT HARVEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 111
Pages: 550–550

Head Matter:
BOROUGH OF NEW SHREWSBURY, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. BLOCK 105, LOT 11, ET ALS., DEFENDANTS, AND HERBERT HARVEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued September 15, 1970
Decided October 7, 1970.
Before Judges Lewis, Matthews and Mintz.
Mrs. Sylvia B. Pressler argued the cause for appellant Herbert Harvey.
Mr. Martin M. Barger argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Reussille, Cornwell, Mausner & Carotenuto, attorneys) .

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The questions raised on this appeal are affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Lane in his opinion for the Chancery Division reported at 104 N. J. Super. 360, and his oral opinions of January 30, 1969 and March 7, 1969.