Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Salvador DELGADO-ROMERO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-02-10
Citations: 87 F. App'x 667
Docket Number: No. 02-50484; D.C. No. CR-01-03185-JTM
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Salvador DELGADO-ROMERO, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 87
Pages: 667–667

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Salvador DELGADO-ROMERO, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 02-50484.
D.C. No. CR-01-03185-JTM.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 4, 2004.
Decided Feb. 10, 2004.
Terri K. Flynn, Steven E. Stone, Asst. U.S. Atty., USSD-Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Charles N. Guthrie, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before KOZINSKI, O’SCANNLAIN and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
1. The government's actions regarding the alleged videotape did not constitute "bad faith" and, thus, do not support sanctions. See United States v. Barton, 995 F.2d 931, 936 (9th Cir.1993).
2. Delgado-Romero's waiver of his appeal was "considered and intelligent," and therefore valid. United States v. Arrieta, 224 F.3d 1076, 1079 (9th Cir.2000). He thus cannot collaterally attack his underlying deportation order. Id.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.