Case Name: BETTY REED, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JOHN SLAUGHTER, CONSTANCE SLAUGHTER AND SLAUGHTER'S BETTER CLEANERS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND COUNTY OF ESSEX, DIVISION OF WELFARE, AND STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, DEFENDANTS
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1987-03-19
Citations: 217 N.J. Super. 214
Docket Number: 
Parties: BETTY REED, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JOHN SLAUGHTER, CONSTANCE SLAUGHTER AND SLAUGHTER’S BETTER CLEANERS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND COUNTY OF ESSEX, DIVISION OF WELFARE, AND STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, DEFENDANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 217
Pages: 214–215

Head Matter:
BETTY REED, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JOHN SLAUGHTER, CONSTANCE SLAUGHTER AND SLAUGHTER’S BETTER CLEANERS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND COUNTY OF ESSEX, DIVISION OF WELFARE, AND STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Submitted February 24, 1987—
Decided March 19, 1987.
Beforé Judges ANTELL and LONG.
David H. Ben-Asher, Essex County Counsel, attorney for appellant Essex County Division of Welfare (Allen Zaks, Assistant County Counsel, of counsel and Allan C. Stephens, Assistant County Counsel, on the brief).
W. Cary Edwards, Attorney General, attorney for respondent Department of Human Services (Dorothy J. Donnelly, Deputy Attorney General, on the statement).
Norman A. Maranz, attorney for respondent Betty Reed (Norman A. Maranz on the brief).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The determination under review is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated by Judge Yanoff (Retired on Recall) in his formal written opinion of June 6,1986 for the Law Division, 213 N.J.Super. 123.