Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jon Jerald HAMMILL, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-09-07
Citations: 489 F. App'x 357
Docket Number: No. 11-15248
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jon Jerald HAMMILL, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before BARKETT, PRYOR and HILL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 489
Pages: 357–358

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jon Jerald HAMMILL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-15248
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Sept. 7, 2012.
Judy K. Hunt, Robert E. O’Neill, Lynn Riedel, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, Glenn Irwin Chernigoff, U.S. Department of Justice-Criminal Division. Henry Parker Van Dyck, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Howard C. Anderson, John Leonard Ba-dalamenti, Rosemary Cakmis, Donna Lee Elm, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Orlando, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before BARKETT, PRYOR and HILL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
John Badalamenti, appointed counsel for Jon Hammill in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Hammill's conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.