Case Name: Ferdinand Poltl, Respondent, v. Joseph Caracciolo and Andrew M. O'Connor, Appellants, Impleaded with Others, Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1923-02
Citations: 205 A.D. 894
Docket Number: 
Parties: Ferdinand Poltl, Respondent, v. Joseph Caracciolo and Andrew M. O’Connor, Appellants, Impleaded with Others, Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 205
Pages: 894–894

Head Matter:
Ferdinand Poltl, Respondent, v. Joseph Caracciolo and Andrew M. O’Connor, Appellants, Impleaded with Others, Defendants.

Opinion:
Judgment reversed on the law and in the exercise of our discretion, and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. We are of opinion that the amendment to the answer, sought by the defense, should have been allowed. (See Rules Civ. Prac., rule 166.) Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Kapper, JJ., concur.