Case Name: Bernard M. Bloom, as Kings County Surrogate, et al., Appellants, v. Matthew T. Crosson, as Chief Administrator of the Courts of the State of New York, Respondent, et al., Defendant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1993-10-07
Citations: 82 N.Y.2d 768
Docket Number: 
Parties: Bernard M. Bloom, as Kings County Surrogate, et al., Appellants, v Matthew T. Crosson, as Chief Administrator of the Courts of the State of New York, Respondent, et al., Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 82
Pages: 768–771

Head Matter:
[624 NE2d 175, 603 NYS2d 991]
Bernard M. Bloom, as Kings County Surrogate, et al., Appellants, v Matthew T. Crosson, as Chief Administrator of the Courts of the State of New York, Respondent, et al., Defendant.
Argued September 2, 1993;
decided October 7, 1993
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Cahn Wishod Wishod & Lamb, Melville (Richard C. Cahn, Eugene L. Wishod, Scott M. Karson, Frederick Eisenbud and Howard M. Miller of counsel), for appellants.
Michael Colodner, New York City, and John Eiseman, Stephen E. Gross, Lawrence K. Marks and Kenneth Falk for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, and certified question answered in the negative for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice A. Franklin Mahoney at the Appellate Division (183 AD2d 341).
Concur: Judges Simons, Titone, Hancock, Jr., Bellacosa and Smith. Taking no part: Chief Judge Kaye and Judge Levine.