Case Name: NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA, Appellant, v. Roxana DIAZ-PAEZ and Wilfredo Fife, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1987-02-10
Citations: 502 So. 2d 74
Docket Number: No. 86-950
Parties: NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA, Appellant, v. Roxana DIAZ-PAEZ and Wilfredo Fife, Appellees.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 502
Pages: 74–75

Head Matter:
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA, Appellant, v. Roxana DIAZ-PAEZ and Wilfredo Fife, Appellees.
No. 86-950.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 10, 1987.
Merritt, Sikes & Craig, P.A., and William L. Summers, Miami, for appellant.
Arthur J. Morburger, Miami, for appel-lees.
Before BARKDULL, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We agree with the appellant, National Union, that the factual issue of a knowing rejection of uninsured motorist coverage remains in this case. It was error, therefore, for the trial court to have granted summary judgment. See Commercial Union Ins. Co. v. Velazquez, 464 So.2d 210 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.