Case Name: Sartwell & a. v. Mack
Court: New Hampshire Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Hampshire
Decision Date: 1900-12
Citations: 70 N.H. 636
Docket Number: 
Parties: Sartwell & a. v. Mack.
Judges: Peaslee, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
Reporter: New Hampshire Reports
Volume: 70
Pages: 636–636

Head Matter:
Coös,
Dec., 1900.
Sartwell & a. v. Mack.
Assumpsit, to recover $155.38 for goods sold and delivered. Facts found by a referee. The defendant sought to recoup damages resulting from the inferior quality of goods sold to him by the plaintiffs at an earlier date. The damages were assessed at •$119.80. Subject to the plaintiffs’ exception, the court allowed the defendant to amend by pleading set-off, and ordered judgment for the plaintiffs for $35,53.
Jason U. Dudley, for the plaintiffs.
Thomas E. Johnson, for the defendant.

Opinion:
Pike, J.
It does not appear that the plaintiffs objected at the time to the trial of the defendant's cause, -arising out of the former sale. Nor is there any suggestion that the trial was not fair, or that the plaintiffs- have been prejudiced by the course pursued. It is now too late for the plaintiffs to object.
Exception overruled.
Peaslee, J., did not sit: the others concurred.