Case Name: Joseph H. Newins et al., App'lts, v. H. Eckford Rose, Resp't
Court: New York Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1895-05-13
Citations: 66 N.Y. St. Rep. 871
Docket Number: 
Parties: Joseph H. Newins et al., App'lts, v. H. Eckford Rose, Resp’t.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 66
Pages: 871–872

Head Matter:
Joseph H. Newins et al., App'lts, v. H. Eckford Rose, Resp’t.
Sup. Ct., 2 D.,
May 13, 1895.
George F. Stackpole, for app’ts; Arington H. Carman, for resp’t.

Opinion:
Cullen, J.
I vote to affirm, without opinion. The testimony of Seaman that he did not sell the goods to defendant was erroneously admitted against •defendant's objection and exceptions, and was a mere statement of conclusion. He did not state wliat the transaction was, nor deny defendant's statement, that nothing was said between them reserving the goods plaintiffs had sold Seaman.