Case Name: BOARD OF PHARMACY OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF, v. BENJAMIN R. FAUNCE, DEFENDANT; BOARD OF PHARMACY OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF, v. EDWARD L. STOCKTON, DEFENDANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1928-04-19
Citations: 6 N.J. Misc. 385
Docket Number: 
Parties: BOARD OF PHARMACY OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF, v. BENJAMIN R. FAUNCE, DEFENDANT. BOARD OF PHARMACY OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF, v. EDWARD L. STOCKTON, DEFENDANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 6
Pages: 385–385

Head Matter:
BOARD OF PHARMACY OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF, v. BENJAMIN R. FAUNCE, DEFENDANT. BOARD OF PHARMACY OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF, v. EDWARD L. STOCKTON, DEFENDANT.
Submitted January 27, 1928
Decided April 19, 1928.
Before Justices Trenchard, Kalisch and Katzenbach.
For the plaintiff, Edward L. Katzenbach, attorney-general.
For the defendants, Robert Peacock.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
These cases have been argued together. Both defendants were charged with the violation of section 2 of an act entitled "An act to regulate the practice of pharmacy in this state." 3 Gomp. Stat., p. 3944.
The defendants were both convicted in the small cause court, but on appeal to the Common Pleas, that court granted a nonsuit.
We consider that the legal propriety of that action is fairly debatable, and a writ of certiorari is granted in each case.