Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Appellant, v. BRUCE DOUGLAS HALL, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1981-11-09
Citations: 54 Or. App. 679
Docket Number: No. G-81-14, CA A21111
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Appellant, v. BRUCE DOUGLAS HALL, Respondent.
Judges: Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Roberts and Young, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 54
Pages: 679–680

Head Matter:
Submitted on record and briefs October 2.
reversed and remanded for trial November 9, 1981
STATE OF OREGON, Appellant, v. BRUCE DOUGLAS HALL, Respondent.
(No. G-81-14, CA A21111)
635 P2d 681
Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, Salem, William F. Gary, Solicitor General, and Thomas H. Denney, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for appellant.
Daniel W. Seitz and Cegavske & Seitz, Roseburg, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Roberts and Young, Judges.
PER CURIAM.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The state appeals a trial court order suppressing evidence seized pursuant to a warrant. The trial court found the affidavit in support of the warrant insufficient. We find the challenged affidavit establishes probable cause. See United States v. Ventresca, 380 US 102, 85 S Ct 741, 13 L Ed 2d 684 (1965); United States v. Allen, 588 F2d 1100, 1106 (5th Cir), cert den sub nom Perkins v. United States, 441 US 965, 99 S Ct 2415, 60 L Ed 2d 1071 (1979).
Reversed and remanded for trial.