Case Name: Khidr ABDUL-KHABIR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. D. STEARNS, Sergeant, Hampton Roads Regional Jail; E. Taylor, Captain, Hampton Roads Regional Jail; David Simons, Assistant Superintendent, Hampton Roads Regional Jail; C. Poe, Sergeant (Classification) Hampton Roads Regional Jail; Roy W. Cherry, Superintendent, Hampton Roads Regional Jail, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-11-15
Citations: 50 F. App'x 173
Docket Number: No. 02-7424
Parties: Khidr ABDUL-KHABIR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. D. STEARNS, Sergeant, Hampton Roads Regional Jail; E. Taylor, Captain, Hampton Roads Regional Jail; David Simons, Assistant Superintendent, Hampton Roads Regional Jail; C. Poe, Sergeant (Classification) Hampton Roads Regional Jail; Roy W. Cherry, Superintendent, Hampton Roads Regional Jail, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 50
Pages: 173–174

Head Matter:
Khidr ABDUL-KHABIR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. D. STEARNS, Sergeant, Hampton Roads Regional Jail; E. Taylor, Captain, Hampton Roads Regional Jail; David Simons, Assistant Superintendent, Hampton Roads Regional Jail; C. Poe, Sergeant (Classification) Hampton Roads Regional Jail; Roy W. Cherry, Superintendent, Hampton Roads Regional Jail, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 02-7424.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 7, 2002.
Decided Nov. 15, 2002.
Khidr Abdul-Khabir, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Khidr Abdul-Khabir appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Abdub-Khabir v. Steams, No. CA-02-708-2 (E.D.Va. Sept. 18, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.