Case Name: Terry K. PLEASANT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. G. GALAZA; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-01-15
Citations: 54 F. App'x 285
Docket Number: No. 02-15478; D.C. No. CV-00-07177-AWI
Parties: Terry K. PLEASANT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. G. GALAZA; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 54
Pages: 285–286

Head Matter:
Terry K. PLEASANT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. G. GALAZA; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
No. 02-15478.
D.C. No. CV-00-07177-AWI.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 13, 2003.
Decided Jan. 15, 2003.
Before BEEZER, KLEINFELD, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Terry K. Pleasant, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging prison conditions violated his federal and state constitutional rights. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Zimmerman v. City of Oakland, 255 F.3d 734, 737 (9th Cir.2001), and we affirm.
The district court properly dismissed the action without prejudice because Pleasant failed to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing suit. See Booth v. Churner, 532 U.S. 731, 741, 121 S.Ct. 1819, 149 L.Ed.2d 958 (2001); McKinney v. Carey, 311 F.3d 1198, 1199 (9th Cir.2002) (per curiam).
The district court properly denied his motion for reconsideration because Pleasant did not present adequate grounds for relief. See Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah County v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262-64 (1993).
We express no opinion on the merits of Pleasant's claims should he choose to refile.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.