Case Name: SZAKAL v. STATE
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1923-06-29
Citations: 1 Ohio Law Abs. 783
Docket Number: No. 524
Parties: SZAKAL v. STATE
Judges: 
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 1
Pages: 783–783

Head Matter:
No. 806
SZAKAL v. STATE
Ohio Appeals, 2nd District, Montgomery County
No. 524.
Decided June 29, 1923
5. INTOXICATING LIQUORS.
Affidavit in the language of the statute relating transporting of liquor, held sufficient.

Opinion:
r THE COURT.
Epitomized Opinion
Szakal was indicted for transporting whiskey in i City of Dayton. As the affidavit under which ; defendant was convicted did not state the places >m which and to which said transportation was d, or explain a failure so to do, the accused imed that it was insufficient. In sustaining the iviction, the Court of Appeals held:
I. The criminal act charged in the affidavit, to/ ;, transport'ng liquor, is definitely set forth in : statute and where the affidavit follows the lan-ige of the statute it is sufficient. (Citing Oras State, decided by Judge Snediker of the Common s Court of Montgomery County.)