Case Name: HIGH PERFORMANCE STL, Appellant, v. DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2017-11-07
Citations: 534 S.W.3d 402
Docket Number: WD 80566
Parties: HIGH PERFORMANCE STL, Appellant, v. DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Respondent.
Judges: Before Division One: Cynthia L.-Martin, Presiding Judge, James Edward Welsh, ' ' Judge and Karen King Mitchell, Judge
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 534
Pages: 402–402

Head Matter:
HIGH PERFORMANCE STL, Appellant, v. DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Respondent.
WD 80566
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
ORDER FILED: November 7, 2017
Rehearing Denied December 14, 2017
William F. Whealen, Jr., St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Bart A, Matanic, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before Division One: Cynthia L.-Martin, Presiding Judge, James Edward Welsh, ' ' Judge and Karen King Mitchell, Judge

Opinion:
ORDER
Per curiam:
High Performance STL'appeals from a decision by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, which found that workers engaged as volleyball coaches performed services for High Performance in "employment," and for "wages," within the meaning of sections 288.034 and 288.036, respectively. High Performance argues that there was not sufficient competent evidence in the record to support the Commission's decision. We affirm the Commission's decision. Rule 84.16(b). '