Case Name: BRADLEY v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1911-03-08
Citations: 136 S.W. 446
Docket Number: 
Parties: BRADLEY v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 136
Pages: 446–447

Head Matter:
BRADLEY v. STATE.
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
March 8, 1911.
On Rehearing, March 29, 1911.
On Further Motion for Rehearing, April 19, 1911.)
1. Bail (§ 65 ) — Appeal — Recognizance — Sufficiency.
An appeal must be dismissed where the recognizance does not show that accused has been convicted of any offense, or that any punishment has been assessed against him.
[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Bail, Cent. Dig. § 285; Dec. Dig. § 65. ]
2. Ceiminal Law (§ 1056*) — Appeal—Questions Reviewable.
In a misdemeanor case, accused must except to the instructions at the time, and must ask additional instructions, and, unless he does so, the instructions will not be reviewed on appeal unless radically wrong.
[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. 2668, 2670; Dec. Dig. § 1056.*]
On Further Motion for Rehearing.
3. Criminal Law (§ 1133*) — Appeai^Ques-tions Reviewable.
Accused in a misdemeanor case may not for the first time raise the question on rehearing that the court erred in not charging on circumstantial evidence.
[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Lawf Cent. Dig. § 2984; Dec. Dig. § 1133.*]
Appeal from Scurry County Court; C. R. Buchanan, Judge.
R. T. Bradley was convicted of larceny, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
Payne & Perkins, for appellant. C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
For other cases see same topic and section NUMBER in Dec. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key No. Series & Rep’r Indexes

Opinion:
HARPER, J.
The appellant was tried in the county court of Scurry county, charged with the offense of theft of property under $50 in value.
The Assistant Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal because of the insufficiency of the recognizance, in that the recognizance does not show that defendant has been convicted of any offense, or that any punishment has been assessed against him. The recognizance not being in the form required by law, and not containing in substance the necessary allegations, the motion is sustained, and this cause is dismissed.