Case Name: Titus THOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer ALLGOOD; Officer Vine; George Gregory, Hearing Officer; CCMS Willis; Officer Hawkins; Officer Robe; Officer Jerome; Sgt. Smith; Sgt. Oliver; Officer K. Brown; Sgt. D. Anderson, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-06-01
Citations: 433 F. App'x 168
Docket Number: No. 11-6105
Parties: Titus THOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer ALLGOOD; Officer Vine; George Gregory, Hearing Officer; CCMS Willis; Officer Hawkins; Officer Robe; Officer Jerome; Sgt. Smith; Sgt. Oliver; Officer K. Brown; Sgt. D. Anderson, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 433
Pages: 168–168

Head Matter:
Titus THOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer ALLGOOD; Officer Vine; George Gregory, Hearing Officer; CCMS Willis; Officer Hawkins; Officer Robe; Officer Jerome; Sgt. Smith; Sgt. Oliver; Officer K. Brown; Sgt. D. Anderson, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 11-6105.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 26, 2011.
Decided: June 1, 2011.
Titus Thomas, Appellant Pro Se.
Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Titus Thomas appeals the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil rights complaint for failing to comply with the court's earlier order requiring him to particularize and amend his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Thomas v. Allgood, No. 8:10-cv-03134-AW (D.Md. Dec. 23, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.