Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Russell Kenton COLEMAN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-10-21
Citations: 397 F. App'x 995
Docket Number: No. 08-41325
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Russell Kenton COLEMAN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 397
Pages: 995–996

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Russell Kenton COLEMAN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-41325
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Oct. 21, 2010.
Traci Lynne Kenner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tyler, TX, Tracey M. Batson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Plano, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Frank Warren Henderson, Esq., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Office of the Federal Defender, Frisco, TX, Bernard John Shealy, Federal Defender’s Office, Beaumont, TX, G. Patrick Black, Federal Public Defender, Amy R. Blalock, Attorney, Federal Defender’s Office, Tyler, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Russell Kenton Coleman, Oakdale, LA, pro se.
Before KING, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Russell Kenton Coleman has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Coleman has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel's brief, and Coleman's response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Coleman's motion to proceed pro se on appeal is DENIED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.