Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis Angel BOTELLO, a.k.a. Juan Rodriguez-Jimenez, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-02-23
Citations: 468 F. App'x 791
Docket Number: Nos. 11-30222, 11-30224
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis Angel BOTELLO, a.k.a. Juan Rodriguez-Jimenez, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 468
Pages: 791–791

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis Angel BOTELLO, a.k.a. Juan Rodriguez-Jimenez, Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 11-30222, 11-30224.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 21, 2012.
Filed Feb. 23, 2012.
Pamela Jackson Byerly, Assistant U.S., USSP-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Spokane, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Matthew Campbell, Assistant Federal Public Defender, FPDWA-Federal Public Defender’s Office, Spokane, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
In these consolidated appeals, Luis Angel Botello appeals from the 63-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being an alien in the United States after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and from the six-month concurrent sentence imposed following revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm
Botello contends his sentences are substantively unreasonable. The within-Guidelines sentences are substantively reasonable in light of the totality of the circumstances and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) and 3583(e). See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992-93 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.