Case Name: Patricia J. NOLAN, Employee/Respondent, v. FLAT RIVER GLASS CO., Employer/Appellant, and Zurich American Insurance CO., Insurer/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-03-26
Citations: 71 S.W.3d 262
Docket Number: No. ED 79763
Parties: Patricia J. NOLAN, Employee/Respondent, v. FLAT RIVER GLASS CO., Employer/Appellant, and Zurich American Insurance CO., Insurer/Appellant.
Judges: Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 71
Pages: 262–262

Head Matter:
Patricia J. NOLAN, Employee/Respondent, v. FLAT RIVER GLASS CO., Employer/Appellant, and Zurich American Insurance CO., Insurer/Appellant.
No. ED 79763.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
March 26, 2002.
James F. Malone, Malone & Associates, St. Louis, for Respondent.
Stephen Mcmanus, Jennifer Greene, Mcanany, Van Cleve & Phillips, St. Louis, for Appellants.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Flat River Glass Company appeals from a Final Award Allowing Compensation (Final Award) of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) modifying the Award and Decision of the Administrative Law Judge as to the type of disability benefits awarded to Patricia J. Nolan. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the Commission's Final Award is supported by competent and substantial evidence and is not clearly contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence. Landers v. Chrysler Corp., 963 S.W.2d 275, 279 (Mo.App. E.D.1997). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).