Case Name: Holton v. The State
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1923-01-11
Citations: 29 Ga. App. 387
Docket Number: 14056
Parties: Holton v. The State.
Judges: Luhe and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 29
Pages: 387–387

Head Matter:
14056.
Holton v. The State.
Decided January 11, 1923.
Indictment for manufacture of liquor; from Treutlen superior court — Judge Graham. November 4, 1922.
George B. Davis, W. J. Wallace, for plaintiff in error.
M. H. Boyer, solicitor-general, Saffold & Stallings, contra.

Opinion:
Broyles, C. J.
1. Under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court a ground of a motion for a new trial, complaining of the admission of documentary evidence, cannot be considered, where the documentary evidence is not set forth in -the ground nor attached as an exhibit thereto. This ruling disposes of the first ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial.
2. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, the alleged newly discovered evidence is-merely impeaching in its character, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Luhe and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.