Case Name: Cassel Goorin v. The Allegheny Traction Company, and Pittsburg & Birmingham Traction Co., Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1897-01-04
Citations: 179 Pa. 333
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 62
Parties: Cassel Goorin v. The Allegheny Traction Company, and Pittsburg & Birmingham Traction Co., Appellant.
Judges: Before Sterrett, C. J., Green, Williams, McCollum, Mitchell, Dean and Fell, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 179
Pages: 333–334

Head Matter:
Cassel Goorin v. The Allegheny Traction Company, and Pittsburg & Birmingham Traction Co., Appellant.
January 4,1897:
Argued Oct. 28, 1896.
Appeal, No. 62, Oct. T., 1896, by defendant, Pittsburg & Birmingham Traction Company, from judgment of C. P. No. 3, Allegheny Co., Feb. T., 1895, on verdict for plaintiff.
Before Sterrett, C. J., Green, Williams, McCollum, Mitchell, Dean and Fell, JJ.
Affirmed.
Trespass for personal injuries.
The facts appear by the preceding case.
A. W. Duff, for Pittsburg & Birmingham Traction Co.,
cited Pitts. & Conn. R. R. v. McClurg, 56 Pa. 294; Herstine v. Lehigh R. R., 151 Pa. 255; Holden v. P. R. R., 169 Pa. 16; Dean v. P. R. R., 129 Pa. 521; Bunting v. Hogsett, 139 Pa. 376.
Joseph Stadtfeld, for appellee.

Opinion:
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Sterrett,
This case was argued with Goorin v. The Allegheny Traction Co., Appellant, and the Pittsburg & Birmingham Traction Co., No. 60, Oct. T., 1896, ante, 327, in which an opinion has just been filed. Both appeals are from the same judgment and involve substantially the same questions. For reasons given in the opinion referred to, we think the judgment should not be disturbed. There is nothing in either of the specifications that calls for further comment.
Judgment affirmed.