Case Name: In the Matter of the Will of Abby E. Laytin, Deceased
Court: New York Surrogate's Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1896-01
Citations: 1 Gibb. Surr. 496
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Will of Abby E. Laytin, Deceased.
Judges: 
Reporter: Gibbons' Surrogate's Reports
Volume: 1
Pages: 496–498

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Will of Abby E. Laytin, Deceased.
(Surrogate’s Court, New York County,
Filed January, 1896.)
1. Will — Revocation.
A proceeding to revoke probate is instituted by the filing of the petition, within the statutory time, and citations may issue thereafter from time to time to bring in necessary parties.
2. Same — Neglect to proceed.
Neglect of the petitioner to proceed further after filing the petition is not ground for dismissal, as the executor may, in such case, apply for citations.
Application by the surviving executor to dismiss a proceeding for the revocation of probate.
S. M. & D. E. Meeker, for executor; T'hos. W. Eitzgerald, for petitioners.

Opinion:
Arnold, S.
This is an application on the part of the surviving executor of the will to dismiss a proceeding for revocation of the probate thereof.
The petitioners in the latter proceeding filed their petition on the last day allowed for that purpose by section 2648. of the Code, and certain persons, and corporations were therein stated •to be legatees named in the will, and a citation to such parties and to the surviving executor of the deceased, as required by section 2649 of the Code, was accordingly issued, and served upon several of them. Three of the persons so named in the citation had, however, died prior to the filing of the petition, and their personal representatives were not, as such, cited, as provided in the last mentioned section. One other party named in the citation was not served with the same, she having removed from the State.
On the return of the citation a motion was. made on the part •of the executor of the will to dismiss the proceeding, upon the .ground that the petition was filed too late; that the citation should have been served upon all parties required by law to be •cited within sixty days after the petition was filed, and that this had not been done. This motion was denied, upon the authority of Matter of Gouraud, 95 N. Y. 256; but the petitioners were admonished to proceed diligently to bring in the omitted parties. No order was entered on this decision, but, four weeks after it was announced, the petitioners obtained an order for a supplemental citation directed to such persons, but no such citation was then or has since been taken out, and those parties, have not been brought into this proceeding.
The present motion to dismiss the proceeding was made after two months had elapsed from the time this supplemental citation was ordered, and upon the ground of laches on the part of the petitioners in not bringing in these additional parties.' Sup plemental citations are alleged by sncb petitioners to have been issued- to two- other persons not served with the original citation, or not named therein; but such citations have not been returned to this office, nor have any proofs of service of same been filed. The petitioners have failed to- bring all necessary parties before the court, and if that fact could afford sufficient ground for granting this application I should be disposed to grant it; but the language of the Court of Appeals in Matter of Gouraud, supra, seems clearly to hold that, if the petition for revocation of probate is filed within the time limited by law, the contest is then instituted, and that citations may issue at any time, or from time to time thereafter, to the necessary parties; and it is the duty of the Surrogate to issue the same (Code, sec. 2481, subd. 2), and, before proceeding upon the petition, to adjourn the hearing until all necessary parties are cited, notified or appear. If the petitioner does not make the necessary application, the executor, if he desires the allegations of the petition to be disposed of, can have the proper citations issued. In effect the mere failure of the petitioner to proceed further after filing the petition does not make the petition of no effect, or afford ground for its dismissal. I am therefore constrained to hold that I cannot dismiss the proceeding in its present stage.
Application denied.