Case Name: STATE EX REL. Raymond MITCHELL v. STATE of Louisiana
Court: Louisiana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 2018-02-02
Citations: 234 So. 3d 876
Docket Number: No. 2016-KH-1730
Parties: STATE EX REL. Raymond MITCHELL v. STATE of Louisiana
Judges: 
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 234
Pages: 876–876

Head Matter:
STATE EX REL. Raymond MITCHELL v. STATE of Louisiana
No. 2016-KH-1730
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
2/2/2018

Opinion:
ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS
PER CURIAM:
h Denied. Relator's convictions and sentences became final in 2012, and he does not provide a copy of the application for post-conviction relief filed in the district court. He fails to offer proof that his application was timely filed in the district court or that an exception to the time limitation applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.
Relator has now fully litigated two applications for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.