Case Name: CENTRAL OIL COMPANY, Inc., et al., Petitioners, v. Richard L. CHENEY et al., Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1971-10-28
Citations: 253 So. 2d 869
Docket Number: No. 40293
Parties: CENTRAL OIL COMPANY, Inc., et al., Petitioners, v. Richard L. CHENEY et al., Respondents.
Judges: ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 253
Pages: 869–872

Head Matter:
CENTRAL OIL COMPANY, Inc., et al., Petitioners, v. Richard L. CHENEY et al., Respondents.
No. 40293.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Oct. 28, 1971.
E. Bradford Miller and Wm. Earl Tucker, of Gibbons, Tucker, McEwen, Smith, Cofer & Taub, Tampa, for petitioner.
William Reece Smith, Jr., Tampa, for Richard L. Cheney and others, as City Council, and Dick Greco as Mayor of the City of Tampa.
John R. Lawson, Jr., of Holland & Knight, Tampa, and Shepard King of McCarthy, Steel, Hector & Davis, Miami, for Joseph I. Sierra and others, and Northeast Acme Plating & Galvanizing Co.
Paul B. Johnson and Richard A. Bokor, of Gregory, Cours, Paniello & Johnson, Tampa, for Roberta Burkes and others, d/b/a Olson’s Kleen Laundry, Gulf Coast Lead Co., Hillsboro Bottled Gas Co.
Albert S. C. Millar, Jr., of Millar & Fal-lin, Jacksonville, for amicus curiae.

Opinion:
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING GRANTED
PER CURIAM.
This cause is before us on petition for rehearing to reconsider our decision quashing the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Second District, reported as Owen v. Cheney, 238 So.2d 650. The decision sought to be reviewed was alleged to conflict with City of Orlando v. Johnson, 160 Fla. 622, 36 So.2d 209 (1948), and City of Orlando v. Natural Gas and Appliance Company, 57 So.2d 853 (Fla.1952).
Rehearing is granted; oral argument is dispensed with. After carefully reconsidering the briefs and the record arising from this cause, we have come to the conclusion that the decision of the District Court is correct.
Accordingly, the writ of certiorari heretofore issued should be, and the same is, hereby discharged, and our original opinion is hereby withdrawn.
It is so ordered.
ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
BOYD, J., dissents and adheres to former opinion filed June 23, 1971.
ROBERTS, C. J., and McCAIN, J., dissent and concur with BOYD, J.