Case Name: Bertha Adlersheim, Appellant, v. Frank Salzman, Respondent; Berl Adlersheim, Appellant, v. Frank Salzman, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1931-12
Citations: 234 A.D. 840
Docket Number: 
Parties: Bertha Adlersheim, Appellant, v. Frank Salzman, Respondent. Berl Adlersheim, Appellant, v. Frank Salzman, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 234
Pages: 840–840

Head Matter:
Bertha Adlersheim, Appellant, v. Frank Salzman, Respondent. Berl Adlersheim, Appellant, v. Frank Salzman, Respondent.

Opinion:
It may not be said that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. The verdict, however, was clearly against the weight of the evidence. Therefore, the judgment is reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellants to abide the event. Present — Finch, P. J., McAvoy, Martin, O'Malley and Townley, JJ.