Case Name: Hendrik W. VIETOR, Appellant, v. Margaret A. SILL and George M. Crandall, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1973-01-15
Citations: 272 So. 2d 173
Docket Number: No. 72-245
Parties: Hendrik W. VIETOR, Appellant, v. Margaret A. SILL and George M. Crandall, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.
Judges: WALDEN, OWEN, and MAGER, JJ„ concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 272
Pages: 173–174

Head Matter:
Hendrik W. VIETOR, Appellant, v. Margaret A. SILL and George M. Crandall, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.
No. 72-245.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jan. 15, 1973.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 12, 1973.
G. H. Martin, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
No appearance for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The primary law of this case was established via interlocutory appeal in our opinion reported as Vietor v. Sill, Fla.App.1971, 243 So.2d 198, when it was stated at page 199:
"There is no requirement of a binding contract between the apartment seller and a third party to activate the other apartment owners' preemptive rights under the agreement. When the defendant notified the other owners of her 'intention' to sell and the terms and conditions demanded, the other apartment owners then became entitled to buy on those terms. And when one of them agreed to the stated terms and conditions and tendered performance, the defendant became obligated to sell."
An examination of the record and particularly the terms of the appealed final judgment reveals that the able trial judge misapprehended the effect of this holding and thereafter imposed a larger and different burden upon plaintiff. All circumstances considered, it is our opinion that the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded with respectful instructions to enter judgment in favor of the plaintiff as prayed.
Reversed and remanded, with instructions.
WALDEN, OWEN, and MAGER, JJ" concur.