Case Name: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Gerald GARZONE, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2010-10-14
Citations: 607 Pa. 324
Docket Number: No. 237 EAL 2010
Parties: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Gerald GARZONE, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 607
Pages: 324–325

Head Matter:
6 A.3d 499
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Gerald GARZONE, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Oct. 14, 2010.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 14th day of October 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as phrased by Petitioner, is:
Did the Superior Court err in removing the cost of employing county detectives and assistant district attorneys from the trial court's discretion to impose prosecution expenses on a convicted offender?
The Petition of Respondent Gerald Garzone seeking consolidation of his action with that of his brother and Co-Respondent, Louis Garzone, is also GRANTED.