Case Name: WELLS v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1916-03-29
Citations: 184 S.W. 509
Docket Number: No. 4008
Parties: WELLS v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 184
Pages: 509–510

Head Matter:
WELLS v. STATE.
(No. 4008.)
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
March 29, 1916.)
Cbiminal Daw <&wkey;1090(l) — Statement op Facts and Bill op Exceptions — Necessity.
In the absence of statement of facts or bill of exceptions, no question is raised for review on appeal in a criminal case.
[Ed. Note. — For other oases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2653, 2805-2807, 2825-2827, 3204; Dec. Dig. &wkey;1090(l).]
Appeal from Criminal District Court, Dallas County; Robt. B. Seay, Judge.
Robert Wells was convicted of robbery, and he appeals.
Judgment affirmed.
C. C. McDonald, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Opinion:
PRENDERGAST, P. J.
This is an appeal from a conviction of robbery, without a state ment of facts or a bill of exceptions. In the absence of these, no question is raised, which can be reviewed.
The judgment is affirmed.
<®ss>For other cases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes