Case Name: In re INGRAM'S GUARDIANSHIP. JOHNSON et al. v. NELSON et al.
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1925-01-20
Citations: 105 Okla. 296
Docket Number: No. 15116
Parties: In re INGRAM’S GUARDIANSHIP. JOHNSON et al. v. NELSON et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 105
Pages: 296–296

Head Matter:
In re INGRAM’S GUARDIANSHIP. JOHNSON et al. v. NELSON et al.
No. 15116
Opinion Filed Jan. 20, 1925.
Appeal and Error — Dismissal—Removal of Property by Foreign Guardian — Minor Becoming of Age Pending Appeal.
When a minor becomes of age while an appejal is pending involving the right of foreign guardians to remove his property out of the state and out of the custody of the local guardians, and plaintiffs in error file motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the minor has become of age, the motion will be sustained and the appeal dismissed.
(Syllabus by Tkreadgill, G.)
Commissioners’1 Opinion, Division No. 3.
Note.— See under (1) 4C. J. p. 584.
Error from District Court, Muskogee County; William H. Zwiek, Judge.
Probate proceedings by Campbell C. Johnson and Minerva Jones, as foreign guardians of Leonard D. Ingram, a minor, to remove personal property of minor from the state. Judgment denying the application to remove the property and the plaintiffs appeal.
Appeal dismissed.
Wesley, Atkins & Chandler, for plaintiffs in error.
Glenn Alcorn, P. E. Gumm, and T. PI. Davidson, for defendants in error.

Opinion:
Opinion hy
THREADGIDL, O.
Plaintiffs in error have filed motion to dismiss the appeal in the above cause on the) ground that Leonard D. Ingram, the minor, has reached his majority since the appeal was lodged in this court, and since the question involved was the right of the guardian appointed in Washington, D. G., to remove moneys of the minor from the jurisdiction of the court and the custody of his guardians in this stat^, and this question being settled by the majority of the minor the same is moot in this! court.
We think this is correct, the motion should be sustained and the appeal should be dismissed, at the cost of the plaintiffs in error.
By the Court: It is so ordered.