Case Name: THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES (a Municipal Corporation), Appellant, v. SADIE D. GRIFFITH ABBOTT et al., Defendants; LOUISE A. DENKER, Respondent
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1931-05-18
Citations: 114 Cal. App. 756
Docket Number: Civ. No. 7355
Parties: THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES (a Municipal Corporation), Appellant, v. SADIE D. GRIFFITH ABBOTT et al., Defendants; LOUISE A. DENKER, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports
Volume: 114
Pages: 756–757

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 7355.
Second Appellate District, Division Two.
May 18, 1931.]
THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES (a Municipal Corporation), Appellant, v. SADIE D. GRIFFITH ABBOTT et al., Defendants; LOUISE A. DENKER, Respondent.
Erwin P. Werner, City Attorney, and Arthur Loveland and Arthur W. Nordstrom, Deputies City Attorney, for Appellant.
Culver & Nourse for Respondent.

Opinion:
THOMPSON (IRA F.), J.
This is an appeal from an order denying plaintiff's motion to tax costs and with two minor exceptions the facts appearing from the transcript are the same as those in City of Los Angeles, Plaintiff, v. Sadie D. Griffith Abbott, Julia Fanta, etc., et al., Respondents (No. 7369), ante, p. 180 [299 Pac. 807], this day decided. The two exceptions are: (1) The motion to tax costs was based upon three grounds only, the fourth ground, that of attorneys' fees being excessive, being omitted in the instant cause, and (2) the motion was not supported by an affidavit such as is found in the Fanta case, supra. The points of law urged by the appellant, however, are identical and this appeal is determined by the opinion therein.
Order affirmed.
Works, P. J., and Craig, J., concurred.