Case Name: Ferenc K. CSABAI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARTEK BIOSCIENCES CORPORATION; Henry Linsert, Jr.; Richard J. Radmer; Thomas C. Fisher; Jerome C. Keller; Peter L. Buzy; George P. Barker; Jules Blake; Ann L. Johnson; Douglas J. MacMaster; John H. Mahar; Sandra Panem; Eugene H. Rotherg; William D. Smart; James Flatt; Robert J. Flanagan, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-06-24
Citations: 385 F. App'x 298
Docket Number: No. 10-1110
Parties: Ferenc K. CSABAI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARTEK BIOSCIENCES CORPORATION; Henry Linsert, Jr.; Richard J. Radmer; Thomas C. Fisher; Jerome C. Keller; Peter L. Buzy; George P. Barker; Jules Blake; Ann L. Johnson; Douglas J. MacMaster; John H. Mahar; Sandra Panem; Eugene H. Rotherg; William D. Smart; James Flatt; Robert J. Flanagan, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 385
Pages: 298–299

Head Matter:
Ferenc K. CSABAI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARTEK BIOSCIENCES CORPORATION; Henry Linsert, Jr.; Richard J. Radmer; Thomas C. Fisher; Jerome C. Keller; Peter L. Buzy; George P. Barker; Jules Blake; Ann L. Johnson; Douglas J. MacMaster; John H. Mahar; Sandra Panem; Eugene H. Rotherg; William D. Smart; James Flatt; Robert J. Flanagan, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 10-1110.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 17, 2010.
Decided: June 24, 2010.
Ferenc K. Csabai, Appellant Pro Se. Mark D. Gately, Scott R. Haiber, Andrea William Trento, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ferenc K. Csabai appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to Defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Csabai v. Martek Biosciences Corp., No. 1:09-cv-02280-CCB, 2009 WL 5206477 (D.Md. Dec. 23, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.