Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Miguel GUIZAR, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-05-19
Citations: 63 F. App'x 396
Docket Number: No. 01-50607; D.C. No. CR-01-00923-L-02
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Juan Miguel GUIZAR, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before PREGERSON, REINHARDT and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 63
Pages: 396–397

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Juan Miguel GUIZAR, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 01-50607.
D.C. No. CR-01-00923-L-02.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 12, 2003.
Decided May 19, 2003.
Before PREGERSON, REINHARDT and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Juan Miguel Guizar appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 78-month sentence for importing cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 952 and 960. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Guizar's counsel has filed a brief stating that she finds no meritorious issues for review, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our examination of the brief and our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 88-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 800 (1988), disclose no arguable issues for review on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.