Case Name: James Joseph OWENS-EL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-11-14
Citations: 23 F. App'x 889
Docket Number: No. 01-1254
Parties: James Joseph OWENS-EL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 23
Pages: 889–889

Head Matter:
James Joseph OWENS-EL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 01-1254.
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
Nov. 14, 2001.
Before SEYMOUR and McKAY, Circuit Judges, and BRORBY, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER AND JUDGMENT
McKAY, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Mr. Owens-El appeals the district court's dismissal of his Bivens claim and his tort claims brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act. In essence, Mr. Owens-El seeks monetary damages resulting from his allegedly illegal incarceration. Additionally, Mr. Owens-El challenges the district court's denial of standing for Mr. Owens-El to prosecute claims under various criminal statutes.
We have reviewed Mr. Owens-El's claims and the district court's Order and Judgment of Dismissal filed April 9, 2001. We are convinced that the district court's decision is correct. For the same reasons as those stated in the district court's Order and Judgment of Dismissal, we affirm.
The motion to proceed on appeal in for-ma pauperis is granted.
AFFIRMED.
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.