Case Name: Clarence STERLING, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1999-03-12
Citations: 728 So. 2d 340
Docket Number: No. 98-1866
Parties: Clarence STERLING, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: MINER, ALLEN and KAHN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 728
Pages: 340–341

Head Matter:
Clarence STERLING, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 98-1866
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
March 12, 1999.
Stanley H. Griffis, III, of the Law Offices of Victor Lawson Hulslander, Gainesville, for petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carolyn J. Mosley, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Because petitioner did not file a notice of expiration of speedy trial as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191(h), he is not entitled to discharge. See Dabkowski v. State, 711 So.2d 1219 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) and Clark v. State, 698 So.2d 1274 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). In addition, this court has held that prohibition is not an appropriate proceeding for determining disputed issues of fact or to review the sufficiency of the evidence to support the trial court's findings-on which the order denying discharge is based. McKinney v. Yawn, 625 So.2d 885 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). Accordingly, the petition for writ of prohibition is DENIED.
MINER, ALLEN and KAHN, JJ., concur.