Case Name: Randy L. THOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HELMS, Mulliss, Wicker PLLC; James G. Middlebrooks; Mark W. Johnson, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-12-11
Citations: 305 F. App'x 57
Docket Number: No. 08-1764
Parties: Randy L. THOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HELMS, Mulliss, Wicker PLLC; James G. Middlebrooks; Mark W. Johnson, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 305
Pages: 57–58

Head Matter:
Randy L. THOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HELMS, Mulliss, Wicker PLLC; James G. Middlebrooks; Mark W. Johnson, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 08-1764.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 10, 2008.
Decided: Dec. 11, 2008.
Randy L. Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas William Ey, Jr., McGuirewoods, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Randy L. Thomas appeals the district court's order denying relief on his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion filed in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thomas v. Helms, Mulliss, Wicker PLLC, No. 3:07-cv-00052-GCM, 2008 WL 2512900 (W.D.N.C. June 19, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.