Case Name: SOLOMON v. GLICKMAN
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1932-07-12
Citations: 140 Or. 364
Docket Number: 
Parties: SOLOMON v. GLICKMAN
Judges: Bean, C. J., Brown and Campbell, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 140
Pages: 364–364

Head Matter:
Argued June 28;
reversed July 12;
rehearing denied September 14,1932
SOLOMON v. GLICKMAN
(12 P. (2d) 1018)
Samuel B. Weinstein, of Portland, for appellant.
Leo Levenson and Ous J..Solomon, both of Portland (Nicholas Jaureguy, of Portland, on the brief), for respondent.

Opinion:
BELT, J.
This action is based on a promissory note. The defendant answered alleging among other things a counterclaim for rentals. The court sustained a plea of res ad judicata to such counterclaim and judgment was had in favor of plaintiff on the note. The correctness of the ruling of the court depends upon whether the judgment offered in evidence to support the plea of res adjudicata is void or voidable. Having this day held in Glickman v. Solomon that the judgment therein was merely voidable and, therefore, not subject to collateral attack, it follows that the judgment in the instant case is affirmed.
Bean, C. J., Brown and Campbell, JJ., concur.