Case Name: Michael J. FREYMUTH and Donna Freymuth, Respondents/Plaintiffs, v. WOODRUN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, d/b/a Norco Development Company, Appellant/Defendant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1993-09-21
Citations: 861 S.W.2d 203
Docket Number: No. 62612
Parties: Michael J. FREYMUTH and Donna Freymuth, Respondents/Plaintiffs, v. WOODRUN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, d/b/a Norco Development Company, Appellant/Defendant.
Judges: Before GRIMM, P.J., and CARL R. GAERTNER and AHRENS, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 861
Pages: 203–203

Head Matter:
Michael J. FREYMUTH and Donna Freymuth, Respondents/Plaintiffs, v. WOODRUN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, d/b/a Norco Development Company, Appellant/Defendant.
No. 62612.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Sept. 21, 1993.
David M. Korum, Jones, Korum & Jones, Clayton, for appellanVdefendant.
Irwin M. Roitman, Clayton, for respondents/plaintiffs.
Before GRIMM, P.J., and CARL R. GAERTNER and AHRENS, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant Woodrun Development Corp., d/b/a Norco Development Company (builder) appeals the trial court's judgment awarding Michael and Donna Freymuth (purchasers) $9,832.93 on their amended petition and awarding builder $3,146.44 on its counterclaim.
After a thorough review of the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties, we have determined that the judgment of the trial court is reviewable under Rule 73.01, is supported by substantial evidence, and is not against the weight of the evidence. Rule 73.01; Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976). We also find that an opinion would have no precedential value.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).