Case Name: Cincinnati Bar Association v. Fehler-Schultz
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1992-09-02
Citations: 64 Ohio St. 3d 452
Docket Number: No. 92-417
Parties: Cincinnati Bar Association v. Fehler-Schultz.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 64
Pages: 452–454

Head Matter:
Cincinnati Bar Association v. Fehler-Schultz.
[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Fehler-Schultz (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 452.]
(No. 92-417
Submitted June 2, 1992
Decided September 2, 1992.)
Gates T. Richards, Thomas M. Tepe and Edwin W. Patterson III, for relator.
Charles W. Kettlewell, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We have thoroughly reviewed the record and agree with the board's findings of fact and conclusions of law. We also agree with the board's recommendation and are not persuaded by respondent's objections thereto. Thus, we order that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio, consistent with the board's recommendation. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.