Case Name: Marquicio JOHNSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2017-06-06
Citations: 520 S.W.3d 513
Docket Number: No. ED 104252
Parties: Marquicio JOHNSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Philip M. Hess, C.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., Robin Fulton, Sp.J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 520
Pages: 513–513

Head Matter:
Marquicio JOHNSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 104252
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, SOUTHERN DIVISION.
Filed: June 6, 2017
FOR APPELLANT: Srikant Chigurupati, Missouri Public Defender’s Office, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101.
FOR RESPONDENT: Daniel N. McPherson, Assistant. Attorney General, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.
Before Philip M. Hess, C.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., Robin Fulton, Sp.J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Marquicio Johnson (Movant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Movant argues that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object and request a mistrial after a juror allegedly fell asleep during Movant's trial. Finding no error, we affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and have determined that an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. Rule 84.16(b).