Case Name: Edmund D. McAden, Respondent, v. Olympic Amusement Company, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1922-01
Citations: 200 A.D. 884
Docket Number: 
Parties: Edmund D. McAden, Respondent, v. Olympic Amusement Company, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 200
Pages: 884–884

Head Matter:
Edmund D. McAden, Respondent, v. Olympic Amusement Company, Appellant.

Opinion:
Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that it was error to charge that as to plaintiff's disorderly conduct, it was obligatory upon the defendant to prove that by a fair preponderance of evidence. All concur, except Kruse, P. J., and Davis, J., who dissent and vote for affirmance.