Case Name: Marine Trust Company, complainant-respondent, v. Levi David et al., defendants, and Dorothy A. Davis et al., defendants-appellants
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1932-05-16
Citations: 110 N.J. Eq. 424
Docket Number: 
Parties: Marine Trust Company, complainant-respondent, v. Levi David et al., defendants, and Dorothy A. Davis et al., defendants-appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 110
Pages: 424–424

Head Matter:
Marine Trust Company, complainant-respondent, v. Levi David et al., defendants, and Dorothy A. Davis et al., defendants-appellants.
[Submitted February 12th, 1932.
Decided May 16th, 1932.]
Mr. John C. Reed, for the defendants-appellants.
Messrs. Babcock & Champion, for the complainant-respondent.
Messrs. Brenner & Kresch, for the respondent Lillie A. Kasten.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The order appealed from overruling objections to, and ratifying and confirming the sale by the sheriff is affirmed because it appears that the property was sold for the best price obtainable at the time of sale, which price was not shown to have been grossly inadequate. Further it is not shown that there was any fraud, accident, mistake, or irregularity in the proceedings to render the sale ineffectual.
The decree appealed from is affirmed, with costs.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Teenchaed, Paeicee, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Yan Buskiek, Kays, Heteield, Deae, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.