Case Name: The State ex rel. Vansuch, Appellee, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1998-11-10
Citations: 83 Ohio St. 3d 558
Docket Number: No. 96-957
Parties: The State ex rel. Vansuch, Appellee, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellant.
Judges: Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 83
Pages: 558–560

Head Matter:
The State ex rel. Vansuch, Appellee, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellant.
[Cite as State ex rel Vansuch v. Indus. Comm. (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 558.]
(No. 96-957
Submitted September 29, 1998
Decided November 10, 1998.)
Elliott, Heller, Maas, Moro & Magill Co., L.P.A., and C. Douglas Ames, for • appellee.
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, Mary Ann O. Rini and Mark E. Mastrangelo, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The issue presented today was decided previously in State ex rel. Liposchak v. Indus. Comm. (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 194, 652 N.E.2d 753. We find that the court of appeals correctly applied Liposchak in this case, and, accordingly, we affirm the judgment of that court.
Judgment affirmed.
Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.
Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., dissent.