Case Name: Melvin Eugene ROBINSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dwight CRANFORD; Melissa D. Pelfrey; James G. Harris, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-04-24
Citations: 69 F. App'x 108
Docket Number: No. 03-6433
Parties: Melvin Eugene ROBINSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dwight CRANFORD; Melissa D. Pelfrey; James G. Harris, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 69
Pages: 108–108

Head Matter:
Melvin Eugene ROBINSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dwight CRANFORD; Melissa D. Pelfrey; James G. Harris, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 03-6433.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 17, 2003.
Decided April 24, 2003.
Melvin Eugene Robinson, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Melvin Eugene Robinson appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Robinson v. Cranford, No. CA-03-145-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 27, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.