Case Name: David Cole Creamery Co., appellee, v. Henry S. McDonald et al., appellants; Kirschbraun & Sons v. McDonald; Bushman Warehouse Co. v. McDonald; Wollstein & Co. v. McDonald; Rosso Fruit Co. v. McDonald; Mid-West Electric Co. v. McDonald; Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. McDonald; Bertschy Garage v. McDonald; Chicago Liquor House v. McDonald; Blotcky v. McDonald; Case Plow Works v. McDonald
Court: Nebraska Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Nebraska
Decision Date: 1915-01-02
Citations: 97 Neb. 513
Docket Number: No. 18,796; No. 18,797; No. 18,798; No. 18,801; No. 18,802; No. 18,803; No. 18,804; No. 18,805; No. 18,806; No. 18,807; No. 18,808
Parties: David Cole Creamery Co., appellee, v. Henry S. McDonald et al., appellants. Kirschbraun & Sons v. McDonald. Bushman Warehouse Co. v. McDonald. Wollstein & Co. v. McDonald. Rosso Fruit Co. v. McDonald. Mid-West Electric Co. v. McDonald. Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. McDonald. Bertschy Garage v. McDonald. Chicago Liquor House v. McDonald. Blotcky v. McDonald. Case Plow Works v. McDonald.
Judges: 
Reporter: Nebraska Reports
Volume: 97
Pages: 513–513

Head Matter:
David Cole Creamery Co., appellee, v. Henry S. McDonald et al., appellants. Kirschbraun & Sons v. McDonald. Bushman Warehouse Co. v. McDonald. Wollstein & Co. v. McDonald. Rosso Fruit Co. v. McDonald. Mid-West Electric Co. v. McDonald. Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. McDonald. Bertschy Garage v. McDonald. Chicago Liquor House v. McDonald. Blotcky v. McDonald. Case Plow Works v. McDonald.
No. 18,796.
No. 18,797.
No. 18,798.
No. 18,801.
No. 18,802.
No. 18,803.
No. 18,804.
No. 18,805.
No. 18,806.
No. 18,807.
No. 18,808.
Filed January 2, 1915.
Appeal from the district court for Douglas county: Willis G. Sears, Judge.
Reversed.
George A. Magney, Charles Hafflce, Benjamin 8. Ba Jeer and John A. Rine, for appellants.
R. M. Sicitzler, contra.

Opinion:
Letton, J.
The point involved in each of the above, entitled cases is identical with that decided in the case of Farmers Co-operative Creamery & Supply Co. v. McDonald, ante, p. 510. Fox the reasons given in that case, the judgment of the district court is
Reversed.