Case Name: STATE of Florida ex rel. Dr. Karl F. ROLLER, Petitioner, v. Dr. Edward K. WALKER, Dr. James C. Fulton, Dr. A. C. Wilhelm, Jr., Dr. B. E. Tedeson, and Dr. David P. Sloan, comprising the Florida State Board of Optometry, Respondents
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1969-04-09
Citations: 221 So. 2d 764
Docket Number: No. 2232
Parties: STATE of Florida ex rel. Dr. Karl F. ROLLER, Petitioner, v. Dr. Edward K. WALKER, Dr. James C. Fulton, Dr. A. C. Wilhelm, Jr., Dr. B. E. Tedeson, and Dr. David P. Sloan, comprising the Florida State Board of Optometry, Respondents.
Judges: WÁLDEN, C. J., and McCAIN and REED, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 221
Pages: 764–765

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida ex rel. Dr. Karl F. ROLLER, Petitioner, v. Dr. Edward K. WALKER, Dr. James C. Fulton, Dr. A. C. Wilhelm, Jr., Dr. B. E. Tedeson, and Dr. David P. Sloan, comprising the Florida State Board of Optometry, Respondents.
No. 2232.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.
April 9, 1969.
Rehearing Denied May 14, 1969.
Robert G. DuVal, North Miami, for petitioner.
Charnelle H. Summers, Jr., and Edward P. Swan, Miami, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is a petition for a writ of certiorari to review a decision of the Florida Board of Optometry revoking the petitioner's license and certificate of registration to practice the profession of optometry in the State of Florida. We have reviewed the record and the briefs presented by the parties. We conclude that the hoard acted within its jurisdiction and complied with the essential requirements of law and founded its decision on competent substantial evidence. For this reason the writ of certio-rari is denied. Rapid Delivery Service, Inc. v. Carter, Fla. 1960, 123 So.2d 553.
WÁLDEN, C. J., and McCAIN and REED, JJ., concur.