Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Vincent Pernell KYLE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-02-28
Citations: 468 F. App'x 326
Docket Number: No. 11-7705
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Vincent Pernell KYLE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 468
Pages: 326–326

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Vincent Pernell KYLE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-7705.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 23, 2012.
Decided: Feb. 28, 2012.
Vincent Pernell Kyle, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Randall Ramseyer, Assistant United States Attorney, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Vincent Pernell Kyle appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Kyle, No. 1:08-cr-00035-GMW-PMS-4 (W.D.Va. Dec. 6, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.