Case Name: Gary W. EVANS and Lawrence W. Osborne, Appellants, v. Tommie R. BELL, as Supervisor of Elections for the Consolidated City of Jacksonville, Duval County, Florida, and Victoria Lewis, an Individual and Treasurer of Taxpayers for Reform in Municipal Management, a Political Organization, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-01-08
Citations: 677 So. 2d 306
Docket Number: No. 95-2596
Parties: Gary W. EVANS and Lawrence W. Osborne, Appellants, v. Tommie R. BELL, as Supervisor of Elections for the Consolidated City of Jacksonville, Duval County, Florida, and Victoria Lewis, an Individual and Treasurer of Taxpayers for Reform in Municipal Management, a Political Organization, Appellees.
Judges: JOANOS, MICKLE and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 677
Pages: 306–306

Head Matter:
Gary W. EVANS and Lawrence W. Osborne, Appellants, v. Tommie R. BELL, as Supervisor of Elections for the Consolidated City of Jacksonville, Duval County, Florida, and Victoria Lewis, an Individual and Treasurer of Taxpayers for Reform in Municipal Management, a Political Organization, Appellees.
No. 95-2596.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jan. 8, 1996.
T.A. “Tad” Delegal, III, and B. Kenneth Vickers, Jacksonville, for Appellants.
Fred D. Franklin, Jr., General Counsel; Bruce Page, Assistant General Counsel, Office of General Counsel, Jacksonville, for Ap-pellee Bell.
William L. Durden, Jacksonville, for Ap-pellee Lewis.
Michael R. Yokan, Jacksonville, for Amicus Curiae Robert Flowers, Lee Jones, David Morris, Patrick O’Conner and Greg Young-blood.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Gary W. Evans and Lawrence W. Osborne, residents, voters and municipal employees of the City of Jacksonville, seek to reverse a final summary judgment declaring valid the results of the election of May 9, 1995, in which the Jacksonville electorate approved an amendment to Article 17 of the Jacksonville City Charter that established an appointed, rather than elected, Civil Service Board. Because the material facts are not in dispute and in its lengthy and thoughtful final summary judgment the trial court correctly applied the law, we affirm.
JOANOS, MICKLE and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.