Case Name: Alexander Furgison and wife adsm. Joseph Robinson
Court: New York Court of Chancery
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1823-10-29
Citations: 1 Hopk. Ch. 8
Docket Number: 
Parties: Alexander Furgison and wife adsm. Joseph Robinson.
Judges: 
Reporter: Hopkins' Chancery Reports
Volume: 1
Pages: 8–9

Head Matter:
Alexander Furgison and wife adsm. Joseph Robinson.
1823. Oct. 29.
After appearance to an injunction bill, a copy is to be served on the defendant, without delay; and if not done, the defendant may move to dissolve the injunction.
The neglect of the solicitor, is the neglect of liis client.
Mr. RADCLIFF for defendants.
This was a motion to dissolve the injunction issued in this cause, on an affidavit, stating that the subpoena was served on the defendants in the month of x July last, and that their appearance was duly entered the first day of August thereafter; and notice thereof was duly served on the complainant’s solicitor. But that the complainant’s Solicitor had neglected to serve on the defendant’s solicitor á copy of the bill.
Mr. Emmet for the complainants.
The neglect of the solicitor to serve a copy of the bill ought not to prejudice his client. The statute makes it the duty of the solicitor to serve a copy of the bill, and the proceedings ought to be against him. These proceedings are to enforce despatch and as an offer of a copy of the bill has, since the notice of this motion, been made to the defendants, the application ought to be dismissed.

Opinion:
But by the court :
The neglect of the solicitor, is the neglect of his client. It can not be tolerated, that the complainant, after he has obtained an injunction, should prevent its dissolution by refusing or neglecting to deliver a copy of the bill. If the defendant appears, it is the duty of the complainant's solicitor to serve him with a copy of the bill without delay.
For the neglect of the complainant to serve such copy in season, the injunction must be dissolved.
Order accordingly.