Case Name: Almeda E. Daynard, Respondent, v. Amaziah Daynard et al., Defendants, and Merton E. Sixbury et al., Appellants
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1915-12-17
Citations: 216 N.Y. 736
Docket Number: 
Parties: Almeda E. Daynard, Respondent, v. Amaziah Daynard et al., Defendants, and Merton E. Sixbury et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 216
Pages: 736–736

Head Matter:
Almeda E. Daynard, Respondent, v. Amaziah Daynard et al., Defendants, and Merton E. Sixbury et al., Appellants.
Daynard v. Daynard, 159 App. Div. 934, affirmed.
(Argued December 1, 1915;
decided December 17, 1915.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered November 17, 1913, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action brought against the heirs, legatees and devisees of Luther Daynard, deceased, to enforce specific performance of an alleged oral contract to devise to the plaintiff, his wife, his real property.
John Conboy and Jerome B. Cooper for appellants.
Fred B. Pitcher for respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hiscocic, Collin, Cuddebaok, Cardozo, Seabury and Pound, JJ.