Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Antonio BEAVER, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-03-10
Citations: 963 S.W.2d 474
Docket Number: No. 72675
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Antonio BEAVER, Appellant.
Judges: Before AHRENS, P.J., and CRANDALL and KAROHL, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 963
Pages: 474–474

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Antonio BEAVER, Appellant.
No. 72675.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
March 10, 1998.
Gwenda R. Robinson, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Angel M. Woodruff, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before AHRENS, P.J., and CRANDALL and KAROHL, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals after sentence on charge of robbery first degree, section 569.020 RSMo 1994. The trial court did not err in overruling motions to suppress identification testimony and did not err, plain or otherwise, in permitting a police office to testify regarding any differences in a physical description of the robber and of defendant. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The sentence as a prior offender to run concurrent with an existing sentence is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).