Case Name: NANCY STRUBE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF ILLINOIS (T.I.L.) INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A THE TRAVELERS COMPANIES, WEBSTER M. GRIMM AND C.I.A.P.N.J., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1995-12-06
Citations: 142 N.J. 570
Docket Number: 
Parties: NANCY STRUBE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF ILLINOIS (T.I.L.) INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A THE TRAVELERS COMPANIES, WEBSTER M. GRIMM AND C.I.A.P.N.J., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 142
Pages: 570–570

Head Matter:
667 A.2d 188
NANCY STRUBE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF ILLINOIS (T.I.L.) INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A THE TRAVELERS COMPANIES, WEBSTER M. GRIMM AND C.I.A.P.N.J., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Argued October 23, 1995 —
Decided December 6, 1995.
Craig J. Hubert argued the cause for appellant {Brotman & Graziano, attorneys; Mr. Hubert and Dennis S. Brotman, of counsel and on the brief).
Michele M. Fox argued the cause for respondent The Travelers Indemnity Company of Illinois, etc. (Kenney & Kearney, attorneys; Ms. Fox and Ralph R. Smith, 3rd, on the brief).
C. Edward Speidel argued the cause for respondent Webster H. Grimm, improperly pleaded as Webster M. Grimm {Golden, Rothschild, Spagnola & DiFazio, attorneys).
Marc L. Dembling argued the cause for respondent C.I.A.P.N.J. {Berlin, Kaplan, Dembling & Burke, attorneys).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Baime's opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 277 N.J.Super. 236, 649 A.2d 624 (1994).