Case Name: May against Richardson and others
Court: New York Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1825-02
Citations: 4 Cow. 56
Docket Number: 
Parties: May against Richardson and others.
Judges: 
Reporter: Cowen's Reports
Volume: 4
Pages: 56–57

Head Matter:
May against Richardson and others.
for a bill of particulars beluteajinstüié plaintiff, the movodaformaa rule that the and™ pay the costs of the motion, or that judgment of SH? l°
the 30th September last, an Order for a bill of particulars was made absolute against the plaintiff upon a regular or^er t° show cause, and served on the agent of the plaintiff’s attorney on the 9th October.
A motion was now made for judgment of non-pros; and that the plaintiff pay the costs of this motion,
J. S. Tallmadge, for the motion,
A. C. Paige, contra.

Opinion:
Curia.
Upon an order for a bill of particulars absolute against the plaintiff, the defendant moves this Court, who. make a rule for judgment of non-pros, nisi. As the party disobeying the order is in fault, it is reasonable that he should pay the costs of the motion. In this case, let the plaintiff deliver a bill in 20 days, and pay the costs of this motion or judgment of non-pros may be entered.
Rule accordingly.