Case Name: Owen F. SILVIOUS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The COCA COLA COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-10-31
Citations: 486 F. App'x 364
Docket Number: No. 12-1474
Parties: Owen F. SILVIOUS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The COCA COLA COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 486
Pages: 364–364

Head Matter:
Owen F. SILVIOUS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The COCA COLA COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 12-1474.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 19, 2012.
Decided: Oct. 31, 2012.
Owen F. Silvious, Appellant Pro Se. Adam R. Moore, Shook, Hardy & Bacon, LLP, Kansas City, Missouri; Marc Ellis Williams, Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP, Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Owen F. Silvious appeals the district court's order dismissing his complaint against The Coca Cola Company filed pursuant to the West Virginia Consumer Credit and Protection Act ("WVCCPA"), W. Va.Code Ann. § 46A-6-101 (Lexis Nexis 2006). We have reviewed the record and conclude that Silvious failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, lacked standing, and failed to assert his claims within the applicable four-year statute of limitations. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.