Case Name: In re James RIFFIN, Debtor, James Riffin, Debtor-Appellant, v. Patapsco Bank, Creditor-Appellee, Mark J. Friedman, Trustee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-08-01
Citations: 474 F. App'x 94
Docket Number: No. 12-1257
Parties: In re James RIFFIN, Debtor, James Riffin, Debtor-Appellant, v. Patapsco Bank, Creditor-Appellee, Mark J. Friedman, Trustee.
Judges: Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 474
Pages: 94–94

Head Matter:
In re James RIFFIN, Debtor, James Riffin, Debtor-Appellant, v. Patapsco Bank, Creditor-Appellee, Mark J. Friedman, Trustee.
No. 12-1257.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 26, 2012.
Decided: Aug. 1, 2012.
James Riffin, Appellant Pro Se. Robert S. Glushakow, Nolan, Plumhoff & Williams, Chartered, Towson, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James Riffin appeals the district court's orders: (1) granting the Appellee's unopposed motion to dismiss Riffin's appeal from the bankruptcy court's order; and (2) denying his motion for reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Riffin v. Patapsco Bank (In re James Riffin), No. 1:11-cv-03203-CCB (D. Md. Nov. 10, 2011; Jan. 25, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.