Case Name: Lee Robert WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doctor STEWART, at Columbus Correctional Institution; Nurse, at Columbus Correctional Institution; Lieutenant Colman, at Columbus Correctional Institution; Ms. Hunt, Superintendent at Columbus Correctional Institution; Director of North Carolina Inmate Medical Records, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-05-10
Citations: 127 F. App'x 677
Docket Number: No. 04-7882
Parties: Lee Robert WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doctor STEWART, at Columbus Correctional Institution; Nurse, at Columbus Correctional Institution; Lieutenant Colman, at Columbus Correctional Institution; Ms. Hunt, Superintendent at Columbus Correctional Institution; Director of North Carolina Inmate Medical Records, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before WILLIAMS, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 127
Pages: 677–678

Head Matter:
Lee Robert WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doctor STEWART, at Columbus Correctional Institution; Nurse, at Columbus Correctional Institution; Lieutenant Colman, at Columbus Correctional Institution; Ms. Hunt, Superintendent at Columbus Correctional Institution; Director of North Carolina Inmate Medical Records, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 04-7882.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 27, 2005.
Decided May 10, 2005.
Lee Robert Williams, Appellant pro se.
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Lee Robert Williams appeals the district court's order dismissing as frivolous his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. The district court's opinion concludes that Williams "has simply constructed a complaint and memorandum which includes page after page of legal terminology without any support of alleged facts, dates, and/or injury." We have carefully reviewed the record and find that the factual allegations contained in paragraph (E) of the memorandum/affidavit supporting Williams's complaint meet the minimum factual requirement of a § 1983 claim.
Accordingly, we vacate the district court's order and remand for further proceedings. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
VACATED AND REMANDED
By this disposition, we indicate no view of the merits of Williams's complaint or the nature of the proceedings that may be appropriate on remand.