Case Name: BRODSKY, Respondent, v. METROPOLITAN ST. RY. CO., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1901-06
Citations: 72 N.Y.S. 1095
Docket Number: 
Parties: BRODSKY, Respondent, v. METROPOLITAN ST. RY. CO., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 72
Pages: 1095–1096

Head Matter:
BRODSKY, Respondent, v. METROPOLITAN ST. RY. CO., Appellant.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
June, 1901.)
Action by Morris Brodsky against the Metropolitan Street Railway Company.
H. A. Robinson (G. Glenn 'Worden, of counsel), for appellant. Isidor Cohn, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Although the evidence 'might well lead to a different conclusion from' rthat reached by the learned justice in the court below, it was", nevertheless, conflicting, and there is not a preponderance in defendant's favor sufficiently strong to warrant this court in disturbing the verdict. Judgment affirmed, with costs.