Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jason Paul ROBERTS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-10-18
Citations: 669 F. App'x 746
Docket Number: No. 16-10404 Conference Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jason Paul ROBERTS, Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 669
Pages: 746–746

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jason Paul ROBERTS, Defendant-Appellant
No. 16-10404 Conference Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Date Filed: 10/18/2016
James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
James Matthew Wright, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Amarillo, TX, for Defendant-Appellant
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Jason Paul Roberts raises issues that are foreclosed by United States v. Schofield, 802 F.3d 722 (5th Cir. 2015). In Schofield, 802 F.3d at 729-31, we held that a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1470 qualified as a sex offense for purposes of the Sex Offender Registration Notification Act (SORNA) and that SORNA's residual clause is not ambiguous or unconstitutionally vague. Accordingly, Roberts's motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.