Case Name: Wright WADDELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1993-09-28
Citations: 863 S.W.2d 6
Docket Number: No. 63415
Parties: Wright WADDELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 863
Pages: 6–6

Head Matter:
Wright WADDELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 63415.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Sept. 28, 1993.
S. Paige Canfield, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jennifer A. Glancy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
We find the findings of fact issued by the motion court in overruling Defendant's 24.-035 motion were not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. We further find an opinion would have no precedential value and affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum has been issued to the parties for their use only.