Case Name: In the Matter of the WELFARE OF M.S.E., Child
Court: Minnesota Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Minnesota
Decision Date: 1986-06-17
Citations: 389 N.W.2d 523
Docket Number: No. C1-86-84
Parties: In the Matter of the WELFARE OF M.S.E., Child.
Judges: Heard, considered, and decided by LESLIE, P.J., and FOLEY and WOZNIAK, JJ.
Reporter: North Western Reporter 2d
Volume: 389
Pages: 523–523

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the WELFARE OF M.S.E., Child.
No. C1-86-84.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
June 17, 1986.
Stefan A. Tolin, Minneapolis, for M.S.E.
John Mac Gibbon, Sherburne Co. Atty., Kim E. Branded, Asst. Co. Atty., Elk River, for respondent.
Heard, considered, and decided by LESLIE, P.J., and FOLEY and WOZNIAK, JJ.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The facts of this case are adequately stated in Edwards v. Commissioner of Public Safety, 381 N.W.2d 27 (Minn.Ct.App.1986).
In Edwards, this court held that the arresting officer had probable cause to believe appellant was driving under the influence. Id. at 30. We affirm that decision.
We also held in Edwards that there was sufficient evidence to support the finding that appellant was driving under the influence. Id. We also affirm that decision.
Finally, appellant contends that his constitutional right against self-incrimination was violated when the officer asked him if he was driving without giving a Miranda warning. Such a contention is meritless. See State v. Herem, 384 N.W.2d 880 (Minn.1986); State v. Kline, 351 N.W.2d 388 (Minn.Ct.App.1984).
DECISION
The trial court is affirmed.