Case Name: Jerry R. MEADE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carole WALLACE, Warden; D.L. Graham, Assistant Warden; Braden Fom, Food Service Supervisor, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-02-03
Citations: 120 F. App'x 495
Docket Number: No. 04-7479
Parties: Jerry R. MEADE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Carole WALLACE, Warden; D.L. Graham, Assistant Warden; Braden Fom, Food Service Supervisor, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before LUTTIG and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 120
Pages: 495–496

Head Matter:
Jerry R. MEADE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Carole WALLACE, Warden; D.L. Graham, Assistant Warden; Braden Fom, Food Service Supervisor, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 04-7479.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 27, 2005.
Decided Feb. 3, 2005.
Jerry R. Meade, Appellant pro se.
Before LUTTIG and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Jerry R. Meade appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The district court properly required exhaustion of administrative remedies under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) (2000). Because Meade did not exhaust administrative remedies, the court's dismissal of the action, without prejudice, was not an abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED