Case Name: Kerger v. Dentsply Internatl., Inc.
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2011-06-17
Citations: 128 Ohio St. 3d 1525
Docket Number: 2011-0514
Parties: Kerger v. Dentsply Internatl., Inc.
Judges: 
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 128
Pages: 1525–1525

Head Matter:
2011-0514.
Kerger v. Dentsply Internatl., Inc.

Opinion:
Cuyahoga App. No. 94430, 2011-Ohio-84. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right.
Upon review of Jack Bierig's motion for admission pro hac vice, the motion was untimely. Pursuant to S.Ct.Prae.R. 1.2, the motion for admission pro hac vice shall be filed with the first document the attorney files. The requirement is waived in this instance, and it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted.