Case Name: CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA, etc., Petitioner, v. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, etc., Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2001-11-08
Citations: 800 So. 2d 236
Docket Number: No. SC00-1764
Parties: CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA, etc., Petitioner, v. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, etc., Respondent.
Judges: WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 800
Pages: 236–236

Head Matter:
CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA, etc., Petitioner, v. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, etc., Respondent.
No. SC00-1764.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Nov. 8, 2001.
Thomas R. Bolf of Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster & Russell, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Petitioner.
Robert A. Ginsburg, Miami-Dade County Attorney, and Thomas Goldstein, Assistant County Attorney, Miami, FL, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted review in Miami-Dade County v. City National Bank, 761 So.2d 368 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), based on alleged express and direct conflict with the Second District Court of Appeal's decision in Hodges v. Division of Administration, 323 So.2d 275 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975). Upon further consideration, however, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted in this case. Therefore, we dismiss review of this cause.
It is so ordered.
WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., concur.