Case Name: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. VAN DE KAMP'S HOLLAND-DUTCH BAKERIES, Inc.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1946-03-26
Citations: 154 F.2d 828
Docket Number: No. 10949
Parties: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. VAN DE KAMP’S HOLLAND-DUTCH BAKERIES, Inc.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 154
Pages: 828–828

Head Matter:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. VAN DE KAMP’S HOLLAND-DUTCH BAKERIES, Inc.
No. 10949.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
March 26, 1946.
For former opinion, see 152 F.2d 818.
David A. Morse, General Counsel, Malcolm F. Halliday, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, Joseph B. Robison, and Eleanor Schwartzbach, Attys., NLRB., all of Washington, D. C., and Maurice J. Nicoson, Regional Atty., of Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner.
Guy T. Graves, of Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent.
Before STEPHENS, BONE, and ORR, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this case we refused to decree enforcement of the Board's general cease and desist order 1(b).
There was no specific objection to cease and desist order 1(b) made before the Board. The general exceptions to all the requirements recommended by the trial examiner and to those of the Board's order do not satisfy the provision of Section 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 160(e). This requires objection before the Board to the specific portion of its order complaint of to give the circuit court of appeals power to consider it. National Labor Relations Board v. Cheney California Lumber Company, 66 S.Ct. 553; Marshall Field & Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 318 U.S. 253, 256, 63 S.Ct. 585, 87 L.Ed. 744.
We order our decree of January 7, 1946, modified to include the enforcement of paragraph 1(b) of the Board's order.