Case Name: FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. William TURNER, Defendant/Appellant, v. Netco, Inc., Third-Party Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-11-29
Citations: 179 S.W.3d 313
Docket Number: No. ED 85947
Parties: FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. William TURNER, Defendant/Appellant, v. Netco, Inc., Third-Party Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before NANNETTE A. BAKER, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 179
Pages: 313–314

Head Matter:
FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. William TURNER, Defendant/Appellant, v. Netco, Inc., Third-Party Defendant/Respondent.
No. ED 85947.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Nov. 29, 2005.
Raymond Howard Jr., St. Loras, MO, for appellant.
Adam Ronald Lorenz, Clayton, MO, for Fidelity National Title Insurance Company.
Dennis Robert Chassaniol II, St. Charles, MO, for NETCO, Inc.
Before NANNETTE A. BAKER, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
William Turner (Appellant) appeals from the summary judgments entered by the trial court in favor of Fidelity National Title Insurance Company and NETCO, Inc. (collectively Respondents). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that there are no issues of material fact and Respondents were entitled to judgment as a mat ter of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided ,a memorandum setting forth the reasons for-our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgments pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).