Case Name: FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY v. PORTER, et al.
Court: Florida Circuit Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1984-06-19
Citations: 6 Fla. Supp. 2d 141
Docket Number: Case No. 81-252 CA
Parties: FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY v. PORTER, et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Florida Supplement Second
Volume: 6
Pages: 141–142

Head Matter:
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY v. PORTER, et al.
Case No. 81-252 CA
Division A
Seventh Judieial Circuit, St. Johns County
June 19, 1984
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Ron A. Adams, Steel, Hector & Davis, for plaintiff.
Geoffrey B. Dobson for defendants Porter, Maltby and Robinson Improvement Company.
Ronald E. Clark for defendants Porter and Maltby.
Peter D. Webster for defendant Hudson Pulp & Paper Corporation.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
RICHARD O. WATSON, Circuit Judge.
This cause was heard upon Plaintiffs Motion to Strike Defendants' Claim for Business Damages and to Exclude Evidence Thereof.
The Court considered the memorandums and argument of counsel and finds the issue controlled by the case of Florida Power and Light v. First National Bank and Trust Company of Riviera Beach, 448 So.2d 1141 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984) [9 FLW 828], opinion filed April 11th, 1984.
The Court considered Defendants' claim that Section 73.071(3)(b) is unconstitutional. The First National Bank and Trust Company case did not consider the constitutionality of the statute. If the Court were to find the statute unconstitutional, that would eliminate the recovery of business damages. The Court is without authority to add to the statute a nonpublic body as an entity required to pay business damages.
It is therefore,
ORDERED
1. Plaintiff's Motion to Strike is granted.
2. Defendants' claim for business damages set forth in paragraph 2 of Defendants' affirmative defenses and paragraph b of their prayer for relief is stricken.
3. The Court will rule on proffered evidence during the trial upon proper objection.