Case Name: Malik Jimer WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2016-11-09
Citations: 203 So. 3d 1020
Docket Number: No. 2D14-1732
Parties: Malik Jimer WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: LaROSE and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 203
Pages: 1020–1021

Head Matter:
Malik Jimer WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D14-1732.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Nov. 9, 2016.
Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Christopher E. Cosden, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Elba Caridad Martin-Scho-maker, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

Opinion:
BY ORDER OF THE COURT.
Appellant's motion to stay mandate and motion for reconsideration is denied. On its own motion, this court withdraws the prior per curiam affirmance dated March 16, 2016, and substitutes the following opinion. No further motions for rehearing will be entertained.
KELLY, Judge.
Malik Jimer Williams appeals from his convictions and sentences for first-degree murder and attempted murder. Williams was seventeen years old when he committed the offenses. He raises two issues in this appeal, neither of which require reversal. However, we write to explain why we have affirmed his sentences.
The trial court sentenced Williams to thirty-five years in prison, with a twenty-five-year mandatory minimum term, for the first-degree murder. He also received a sentence of twenty-five years in prison, with a twenty-five-year mandatory minimum term, followed by ten years of probation for the attempted murder. Williams argues he is entitled to be resentenced under chapter 2014-220, Laws of Florida, even though his offenses were committed before the effective date of the new law. We disagree. In Horsley v. State, 160 So.3d 393, 395 (Fla.2015), the supreme court held that all juvenile homicide offenders whose sentences are unconstitutional under Miller v. Alabama, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012), are entitled to be sentenced under chapter 2014-220. Miller prohibits mandatory life-without-parole sentences for juvenile homicide offenders. 132 S.Ct. at 2469. Williams received a sentence of thirty-five years on his conviction for first-degree murder, therefore, his sentence is not unconstitutional under Miller, and he is not entitled to be resentenced under the new law.
In Henry v. State, 175 So.3d 675, 680 (Fla.2015), the court held that Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010), which prohibits life-without-parole sentences for juvenile non-homicide offenders, applies to lengthy term-of-years sentences that do not provide juvenile nonhomicide offenders with a meaningful opportunity for release during their lifetimes. A juvenile nonhomicide offender whose sentence is not unconstitutional under Graham is not entitled to resentencing under the new law. See Williams v. State, 197 So.3d 569, 572 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016). In this case, Williams was sentenced to twenty-five years, with a twenty-five-year mandatory minimum, on his conviction for attempted murder. This sentence is not a de facto life sentence, and therefore is not unconstitutional under Graham. See id. (holding that a sentence of fifty years with a twenty-year mandatory minimum was not a de facto life sentence and did not violate Graham).
Accordingly, we affirm Williams' convictions and sentences.
LaROSE and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.