Case Name: In the Matter of the Application of Isadore Rosenbloom for Admission to Practice as an Attorney and Counselor at Law. (From the State of New Jersey.)
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1936-02
Citations: 247 A.D. 725
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Application of Isadore Rosenbloom for Admission to Practice as an Attorney and Counselor at Law. (From the State of New Jersey.)
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 247
Pages: 725–725

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Application of Isadore Rosenbloom for Admission to Practice as an Attorney and Counselor at Law. (From the State of New Jersey.)

Opinion:
Assuming the New Jersey rule limits the practice of the law in that State to residents, it is indicated that appEcant misunderstood the meaning of the rule. He says that during the last five months of his " actual practice " in New Jersey, court matters were handled for him, by his brother. However, it appearing that, while a resident of this State, he practiced law in New Jersey during five months which were at the end of the five-year period required for practice in the sister State, his application must be denied for the same reason that it is denied in Matter of Rotolo [ante, p. 724], decided herewith. Application denied. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ.