Case Name: Joseph J. SWIDERSKI, Appellant, v. CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK OF LEESBURG, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1998-04-24
Citations: 708 So. 2d 689
Docket Number: No. 97-1335
Parties: Joseph J. SWIDERSKI, Appellant, v. CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK OF LEESBURG, Appellee.
Judges: COBB, GOSHORN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 708
Pages: 689–690

Head Matter:
Joseph J. SWIDERSKI, Appellant, v. CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK OF LEESBURG, Appellee.
No. 97-1335.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
April 24, 1998.
Howard S. Marks and Jessica K. Hew of Graham, Clark, Jones, Builder, Pratt & Marks, Winter Park, for Appellant.
Walter S. McLin. and Christopher V. Carlyle of McLin, Burnsed, Morrison, Johnson, Newman & Roy, P.A., Leesburg, for Appel-lee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellant, Joseph Swidersld, appeals from a final judgment rendered on motions to dismiss and for summary judgment filed by the defendant below, Citizens National Bank of Leesburg, against his multi-count complaint. We affirm the trial court's judgment in all respects except for the entry of a summary judgment on Count V of Swider-ski's complaint wherein he alleged that Citizens breached its contract to extend lines of credit to him for two residential developments. Swiderski claims the bank "unilaterally" restricted the number of homes to be financed at a given time before a mutual modification of the contracts whereby Swid-erski agreed to the reduction. As to this count, we find that there was a sufficient factual conflict raised below to preclude summary judgment.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.
COBB, GOSHORN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.