Case Name: Richard J. DEMPSEY, Appellant, v. LAW FIRM OF CAUTHEN & ODHAM, P.A., David E. Cauthen, Timothy S. Keough, Rudolph Leo Hardick, Michael Hardick, and Montgomery Goodrich, singly, jointly, and severally, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2003-06-03
Citations: 846 So. 2d 1197
Docket Number: No. 5D03-509
Parties: Richard J. DEMPSEY, Appellant, v. LAW FIRM OF CAUTHEN & ODHAM, P.A., David E. Cauthen, Timothy S. Keough, Rudolph Leo Hardick, Michael Hardick, and Montgomery Goodrich, singly, jointly, and severally, Appellees.
Judges: THOMPSON, C.J., PLEUS and PALMER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 846
Pages: 1197–1197

Head Matter:
Richard J. DEMPSEY, Appellant, v. LAW FIRM OF CAUTHEN & ODHAM, P.A., David E. Cauthen, Timothy S. Keough, Rudolph Leo Hardick, Michael Hardick, and Montgomery Goodrich, singly, jointly, and severally, Appellees.
No. 5D03-509.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
June 3, 2003.
Richard J. Dempsey, Cape Canaveral, pro se.
Jamie Billotte Moses of Fisher, Rush-mer, Werrenrath, Dickson, Talley & Dunlap, P.A., Orlando, for Appellees, Law Firm of Cauthen & Odham, P.A., David S. Cauthen, and Timothy S. Keough.
Mark S. Peters of Eisenmenger, Berry & Peters, P.A., Melbourne, for Appellees Michael Hardick and Rudolph Leo Har-dick.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Fla. RApp. P. 9.315(a).
THOMPSON, C.J., PLEUS and PALMER, JJ., concur.