Case Name: RELIABLE FINANCE COMPANY v. James H. R RHODES et al
Court: Arkansas Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Arkansas
Decision Date: 1972-07-10
Citations: 252 Ark. 1077
Docket Number: 5-5963
Parties: RELIABLE FINANCE COMPANY v. James H. R RHODES et al
Judges: 
Reporter: Arkansas Reports
Volume: 252
Pages: 1077–1077

Head Matter:
RELIABLE FINANCE COMPANY v. James H. R RHODES et al
5-5963
483 S.W. 2d 187
Opinion delivered July 10, 1972
[Rehearing denied August 28, 1972.]
Wayne Jewell, for appellant.
James J. Calloway and Denver L. Thornton, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
In disposing of this rather complicated case the trial court made seven separate findings, some of law, some of fact, some of mixed law and fact. The decree of the chancellor is not abstracted and therefore we are left without the benefit of those conclusions. The omissioh violates our Rule 9 (d) because an abstract of thé decree in this case is "necessary to an understanding of all questions presented to this court for decision..."Tudor v. Tudor, 247 Ark. 822, 448 S.W. 2d 17 (1969); Weir v. Hill, 237 Ark. 922, 377 S.W. 2d 178 (1964); Pyramid Life Ins. Co. v. Hamilton, 237 Ark. 797, 376 S.W. 2d 555 (1964); Davidson v. Messing, 214 Ark. 227, 215 S.W. 2d 138 (1949); Ransom v. Warner, 193 Ark. 1179, 103 S.W. 2d 629 (1937).
Affirmed under Rule 9 (d).