Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Richard WISHOM, Appellant; Richard WISHOM, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1992-08-18
Citations: 833 S.W.2d 894
Docket Number: Nos. 59786, 60892
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Richard WISHOM, Appellant. Richard WISHOM, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 833
Pages: 894–895

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Richard WISHOM, Appellant. Richard WISHOM, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 59786, 60892.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Aug. 18, 1992.
John Klosterman, Henry B. Robertson, Brian N. Brown, St. Louis, for appellant.
William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Hugh L. Marshall, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Richard Wishom, appeals from his conviction in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis of second degree murder, RSMo § 565.021 (1986), and armed criminal action, RSMo § 571.015 (1986), for which he was sentenced to consecutive terms of life imprisonment and ten years' imprisonment respectively. Appellant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal files, and the transcript and find no error on the part of the trial court. In addition, we find the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. As we further find that an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value, we affirm appellant's conviction pursuant to Rule 30.25(b), and the denial of appellant's Rule 29.15 motion pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our holding.