Case Name: EAST COAST CAPITAL INVESTMENT, LLC, et al., Appellants, v. NAIMA GROUP, LLC, Appellee.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2019-05-29
Citations: 274 So. 3d 484
Docket Number: No. 3D18-535
Parties: EAST COAST CAPITAL INVESTMENT, LLC, et al., Appellants,
v.
NAIMA GROUP, LLC, Appellee.
Judges: Before EMAS, C.J., and FERNANDEZ and SCALES, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 274
Pages: 484–485

Head Matter:
EAST COAST CAPITAL INVESTMENT, LLC, et al., Appellants,
v.
NAIMA GROUP, LLC, Appellee.
No. 3D18-535
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Opinion filed May 29, 2019
Dieppa Law Firm, P.A., and Eduardo E. Dieppa, III, Hialeah, for appellants.
Escalante Yormack Law, PLLC, and Francisco J. Escalante and Adam J. Yormack, for appellee.
Before EMAS, C.J., and FERNANDEZ and SCALES, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (holding that the appellate court should affirm the trial court's judgment where "the record brought forward by the appellant is inadequate to demonstrate reversible error"); Dabas v. Boston Invr's. Grp., Inc., 231 So.3d 542, 546 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (concluding that the borrower's due process rights were not violated where the borrower's counsel received notice of, and participated fully at, a non-evidentiary hearing without objection and without seeking a continuance of the hearing).