Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tony HOEY, a/k/a Sld Dft 13, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-12-26
Citations: 491 F. App'x 447
Docket Number: No. 12-7354
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tony HOEY, a/k/a Sld Dft 13, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 491
Pages: 447–447

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tony HOEY, a/k/a Sld Dft 13, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-7354.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 20, 2012.
Decided: Dec. 26, 2012.
Tony Hoey, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Lee Edwards, Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorneys, Jill West-moreland Rose, Office of the United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina; Adam Christopher Morris, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Tony Hoey appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Hoey, No. 4:96-cr-00053-MR-13 (W.D.N.C. June 6, 2012; Aug. 3, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.