Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gerald FELTON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-12-21
Citations: 259 F. App'x 557
Docket Number: No. 07-6876
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gerald FELTON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 259
Pages: 557–558

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gerald FELTON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-6876.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 3, 2007.
Decided: Dec. 21, 2007.
Gerald Felton, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Gerald Felton appeals the district court's order denying his motion under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)(2) (West 2005) to reduce his sentence based on Amendment 505 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Our review discloses that a prior motion by Felton to reduce sentence based on Amendment 505 was unsuccessful. Moreover, Felton's claim to reduce his sentence in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), is without merit. See United States v. Rodriguez-Pena, 470 F.3d 431, 433 (1st Cir. 2006). Finally, we find that Lopez v. Gonzales, 549 U.S. 47, 127 S.Ct. 625, 166 L.Ed.2d 462 (2006), cited by Felton, does not support modification of his sentence.
We accordingly affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.