Case Name: Peek v. Kemp, Warden; City of Newport, Kentucky, et al. v. Iacobucci, dba Talk of the Town, et al.; Walker v. Illinois; Whaley v. United States; Stich v. Stich; Clissuras v. City of New York et al.; Miller v. California; Singleton v. Frey, Superintendent, Missouri Eastern Correctional Center; In re Magoon; In re Parrish; Ely v. More Than 20 FBI Agents et al.; Zaky v. United States Veterans Administration et al.; Chambers v. Industrial Commission of Illinois et al.; In re Johl; Butler v. Texas
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1987-01-12
Citations: 479 U.S. 1047
Docket Number: No. 85-7111; No. 86-139; No. 86-277; No. 86-404; No. 86-424; No. 86-474; No. 86-5320; No. 86-5410; No. 86-5414; No. 86-5448; No. 86-5456; No. 86-5493; No. 86-5529; No. 86-5547; No. 86-5559
Parties: Peek v. Kemp, Warden, City of Newport, Kentucky, et al. v. Iacobucci, dba Talk of the Town, et al., Walker v. Illinois, Whaley v. United States, Stich v. Stich, Clissuras v. City of New York et al., Miller v. California, Singleton v. Frey, Superintendent, Missouri Eastern Correctional Center, In re Magoon, In re Parrish, Ely v. More Than 20 FBI Agents et al., Zaky v. United States Veterans Administration et al., Chambers v. Industrial Commission of Illinois et al., In re Johl, Butler v. Texas,
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 479
Pages: 1047–1047

Head Matter:
No. 85-7111.
No. 86-139.
No. 86-277.
No. 86-404.
No. 86-424.
No. 86-474.
No. 86-5320.
No. 86-5410.
No. 86-5414.
No. 86-5448.
No. 86-5456.
No. 86-5493.
No. 86-5529.
No. 86-5547.
No. 86-5559.
Peek v. Kemp, Warden, City of Newport, Kentucky, et al. v. Iacobucci, dba Talk of the Town, et al., Walker v. Illinois, Whaley v. United States, Stich v. Stich, Clissuras v. City of New York et al., Miller v. California, Singleton v. Frey, Superintendent, Missouri Eastern Correctional Center, In re Magoon, In re Parrish, Ely v. More Than 20 FBI Agents et al., Zaky v. United States Veterans Administration et al., Chambers v. Industrial Commission of Illinois et al., In re Johl, Butler v. Texas,

Opinion:
ante, p. 989;
ante, p. 92;
ante, p. 995;
ante, p. 962;
ante, p. 946;
ante, p. 933;
ante, p. 989;
ante, p. 934;
ante, p. 928;
ante, p. 928;
ante, p. 1009;
ante, p. 937;
ante, p. 952;
ante, p. 947; and
ante, p. 946. Petitions for rehearing denied.