Case Name: The State ex rel. Lawhorn, Appellee, v. White, Mayor, et al., Appellants
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1993-08-18
Citations: 67 Ohio St. 3d 158
Docket Number: No. 92-1555
Parties: The State ex rel. Lawhorn, Appellee, v. White, Mayor, et al., Appellants.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 67
Pages: 158–159

Head Matter:
The State ex rel. Lawhorn, Appellee, v. White, Mayor, et al., Appellants.
[Cite as State ex rel. Lawhorn v. White (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 158.]
(No. 92-1555
Submitted May 18, 1993
Decided August 18, 1993.)
Anthony Lawhorn, pro se.
Danny R. Williams, Director of Law, and Pamela A. Pfleger Walker, Assistant Director of Law, for appellants.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Appellants argue that the court of appeals erred by neither considering their claims that certain records were exempt from public release nor performing the requisite in camera inspection of disputed records. We agree. The case is remanded to the court of appeals to consider respondents' exemption claims and to perform the required in camera inspection of disputed records. State ex rel. Natl. Broadcasting Co. v. Cleveland (1988), 38 Ohio St.3d 79, 526 N.E.2d 786, paragraph four of the syllabus; State ex rel. Natl. Broadcasting Co. v. Cleveland (1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 77, 80-81, 566 N.E.2d 146, 150.
The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded as set forth in this opinion.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded.
Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur.
Pfeifer, J., dissents.