Case Name: In the Matter of the Compensation of Dale E. Holden, Claimant. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Dale E. HOLDEN, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1992-09-30
Citations: 115 Or. App. 390
Docket Number: 90-11918; CA A72743
Parties: In the Matter of the Compensation of Dale E. Holden, Claimant. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Dale E. HOLDEN, Respondent.
Judges: Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Rossman and De Muniz, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 115
Pages: 390–391

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted July 24,
affirmed September 30, 1992
In the Matter of the Compensation of Dale E. Holden, Claimant. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Dale E. HOLDEN, Respondent.
(90-11918; CA A72743)
838 P2d 643
Karen O’Kasey, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the brief was Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, Portland.
Darris K. Rowell, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Olson, Rowell & Walsh, Salem.
Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Rossman and De Muniz, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
In this workers' compensation case, employer seeks review of an order of the Board affirming the referee's decision to allow claimant's claim for a knee injury. Employer argues that the Board erred in finding that the cause of the injury was work-related and in determining that the claim was supported by objective medical findings. ORS 656.005(7)(a), (19).
Substantial evidence supports the Board's finding that the knee injury was work-related. Additionally, the Board found that claimant's doctor noted claimant's subjective complaints of sharp pain, a catching sensation, particularly with twisting motions and, also, "notable patellar crepitus" in response to motion and internal rotation. The doctor's report constitutes objective findings. Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Ferrer, 114 Or App 471, 835 P2d 949 (1992).
Employer's remaining argument does not require discussion.
Affirmed.