Case Name: STELLMAN v. BUSHEY
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1914-02-03
Citations: 69 Or. 124
Docket Number: 
Parties: STELLMAN v. BUSHEY.
Judges: Mr. Justice Burnett dissents.
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 69
Pages: 124–125

Head Matter:
Submitted on briefs January 14,
decided February 3, 1914.
STELLMAN v. BUSHEY.
(138 Pac. 256.)
From Marion: William Galloway, Judge.
This is a suit by John Stellman against W. M. Bushey, as county judge of Marion County, Oregon; J. T. Beckwith and W. H. Goulet, as county commissioners of said county. From a decree in favor of plaintiff, defendants appeal.
Reversed.
Submitted on briefs without argument, under the proviso of Rule 18 of the Supreme Court: 56 Or. 622 (117 Pac. xi).
For appellants there was a brief over the names of Mr. Ernest R. Ringo, District Attorney, Mr. Isaac H. Van Winlcle and Mr. Wm. H. Trindle.
For respondent there was a brief over the names of Messrs. Carson & Brown and Messrs. McNary, Smith é Shields.
In Banc.

Opinion:
Mr. Justice Eakin
delivered the opinion of the court.
This is a suit to enjoin the County Court of Marion County from declaring the result of a local option election in the City of Salem. The questions involved are similar to those presented in Wiley v. Reasoner, ante, p. 103 (138 Pac. 250), just decided. Every question raised by this appeal is disposed of by tbe opinion in the latter case, and reference is made to that opinion as controlling in tbis case.
Tbe decree is reversed. Reversed.
Mr. Justice Burnett dissents.