Case Name: David P. FARLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Glenn ROSE; Wayne Jarnison; Betty Kiefin; Jim Johnson, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-01-26
Citations: 2 F. App'x 378
Docket Number: No. 00-2066
Parties: David P. FARLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Glenn ROSE; Wayne Jarnison; Betty Kiefin; Jim Johnson, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 2
Pages: 378–378

Head Matter:
David P. FARLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Glenn ROSE; Wayne Jarnison; Betty Kiefin; Jim Johnson, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 00-2066.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 16, 2001.
Decided Jan. 26, 2001.
David P. Farley, pro se.
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
David P. Farley appeals the district court's order dismissing his suit under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2) (West Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the-reasoning of the district court. See Farley v. Rose, No. CA-00-552-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Aug. 7, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.