Case Name: Scott D. CLABOURNE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles L. RYAN, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-08-01
Citations: 868 F.3d 753
Docket Number: No. 09-99022
Parties: Scott D. CLABOURNE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles L. RYAN, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before: MARSHA S. BERZON, RICHARD R. CLIFTON, and SANDRA S. IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 868
Pages: 753–758

Head Matter:
Scott D. CLABOURNE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles L. RYAN, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 09-99022
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Filed August 1, 2017
D.C. No. 4:03~cv-00542-RCC
S.'Jonathan Young, Williamson & Young PC, Tucson, Arizona, for Petitioner-Appellant.
Jeffrey A. Zick (argued), Jacinda A. La-num, and Amy Pignatella Cain, Assistant Attorneys General; Lacey Stover Gard and Kent Cattani, Capital Litigation Section Chief Counsel; Mark Brnovich, Attorney General; Office of the Attorney General, Tucson, Arizona; for Respondent-Appellee.
Before: MARSHA S. BERZON, RICHARD R. CLIFTON, and SANDRA S. IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
: Concurrence by Judges CLIFTON and IKUTA; ':
Dissent by
Judge BERZON
ORDER
Judges Clifton and Ikuta have voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judge Berzon has voted to grant the petition for panel rehearing.
Judge Ikuta has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Clifton so recommends. Judge Berzon has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc.
The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc, and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35.
The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are therefore DENIED.