Case Name: Edin MUJADZIC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doug SERA, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-09-01
Citations: 332 F. App'x 437
Docket Number: No. 07-35594
Parties: Edin MUJADZIC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doug SERA, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before: WALLACE, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 332
Pages: 437–438

Head Matter:
Edin MUJADZIC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doug SERA, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 07-35594.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 20, 2009.
Filed Sept. 1, 2009.
Edin Mujadzic, Beaverton, OR, pro se.
Doug Sera, Happy Valley, OR, pro se.
Before: WALLACE, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Edin Mujadzic appeals pro se from the district court's order dismissing his action against a former coworker under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir.1998) (order). We affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Mujadzic's action because individual employees cannot be held liable under Title VII. See Miller v. Maxwell's Int'l Inc., 991 F.2d 583, 587-88 (9th Cir.1993) (explaining that Title VII limits civil liability to the employer).
Mujadzic's remaining contentions are unpersuasive.
Mujadzic's "Motion to Payback Money by 6-22-2009" is denied.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.