Case Name: Robert WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2008-03-25
Citations: 977 So. 2d 733
Docket Number: No. 1D07-2948
Parties: Robert WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: BENTON, LEWIS, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 977
Pages: 733–733

Head Matter:
Robert WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D07-2948.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
March 25, 2008.
Robert Williams, pro se, Appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Terry P. Roberts, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellant has appealed an order denying what appears to be a second rule 3.850 motion in which he raises two claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel, one claim of prosecutorial misconduct, and one claim of an illegal sentence due to the trial court's sentencing him to a six-year split sentence of three years' imprisonment to be followed by three years' probation for third-degree felony convictions. We affirm the trial court's summary denial of the claims of ineffective assistance and prosecutorial misconduct. However, the appellant's claim challenging the six-year split sentence appears to have merit since the statutory maximum for a third-degree felony is five years. See § 775.082(3)(d), Fla. Stat. (2004). Along with the other three claims, the trial court denied the illegal sentence claim as successive and, to support its ruling, attached a December 2006 order indicating that the appellant had raised claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel in a previous rule 3.850 motion. The record does not indicate that the appellant had previously raised the illegal sentence claim. As such, the trial court erred in determining it was successive. Therefore, we treat the illegal sentence claim as having been filed pursuant to rule 3.800(a), see Robinson v. State, 916 So.2d 974 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005), and remand for the trial court to address the merits of this claim. See Weeks v. State, 696 So.2d 1319 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).
AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART.
BENTON, LEWIS, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.