Case Name: DORAL II CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, Respondent v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, PENNSYLVANIA HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION, Petitioner
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2002-05-07
Citations: 569 Pa. 192
Docket Number: Petition No. 507 EAL 2001
Parties: DORAL II CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, Respondent v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, PENNSYLVANIA HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION, Petitioner.
Judges: 
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 569
Pages: 192–193

Head Matter:
801 A.2d 1207
DORAL II CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, Respondent v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, PENNSYLVANIA HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION, Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
May 7, 2002.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 7th day of May, 2002, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby granted, limited to the following issue:
Did the Commonwealth Court err in concluding that the accommodation the Zaslows requested was not reasonable because it did not comply with the Building Code and "endangered the safety of the other condominium residents and public in general by narrowing the stairway," when the parties could have applied for a variance from the Building Code and there was no credited evidence in the record that the installed chair lift would, in fact, pose a safety hazard?