Case Name: The State v. Keegan
Court: Iowa Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Iowa
Decision Date: 1888-03-10
Citations: 74 Iowa 145
Docket Number: 
Parties: The State v. Keegan.
Judges: 
Reporter: Iowa Reports
Volume: 74
Pages: 145–146

Head Matter:
The State v. Keegan.
Criminal Law : jury trial : verdiot by agreement. The defendant on a charge of larceny pleaded not guilty, and a jury was impaneled. Thereupon, by agreement between the district attorney and defendant, the jury returned a verdict of guilty. Held that this was equivalent to an admission by defendant of his guilt in open court and in the "presence of the jury, and that the verdict could not be disturbed on the ground that it was not the result of a trial by jury.
Appeal from Blade Hawlc District Court. — Hon. C. F. Couch, Judge.
Filed, March 10, 1888.
Indictment for larceny from the person of another. Trial by jury, verdict of guilty, judgment, and the defendant appeals.
J. 8. Darling, for appellant.
A. J. Baiter, Attorney General, for the State.

Opinion:
Servers, C. J.
The defendant pleaded not guilty, and a jury was impaneled to try such issue. Thereupon, by agreement between the district attorney and the defendant, the jury returned the following verdict: "We, the jury, find the defendant guilty of larceny from the person of another, as charged in the indictment," and on such verdict judgment was pronounced. It is said an issue of fact arises on a plea of not guilty, and that such issue must be tried by a jury. Code, secs. 4349, 4350. It is further said that a trial is a judicial examination of the issues, whether of law or fact, and, therefore, it is contended that the verdict was not rendered in accordance with the law, and is void. We are not prepared to concur in this proposition. To all intents and purposes the defendant admitted his guilt in open court and in the presence of the jury. This presumption must be indulged in the absence of any showing to the contrary. Besides this, it does not appear that no evidence was introduced. In effect the defendant, with a plea of not guilty on file, admitted his guilt; and, as this was done in open court, the jury were fully warranted in acting upon such admission and finding the verdict. Under the admission made, it was the only verdict the jury could have found, and the fact that the form was agreed upon between the state and defendant is immaterial.
Affirmed.