Case Name: Eresch et al. v. Hines
Court: Colorado Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Colorado
Decision Date: 1950-10-30
Citations: 122 Colo. 588
Docket Number: No. 16,362
Parties: Eresch et al. v. Hines.
Judges: 
Reporter: Colorado Reports
Volume: 122
Pages: 588–589

Head Matter:
No. 16,362.
Eresch et al. v. Hines.
(25 P. [2d] 59)
Decided October 30, 1950.
Rehearing denied November 20, 1950.
Mr. Thornton H. Thomas, Jr., for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. Frank A. Safranek, Mr. George M. Gibson, for defendant in error.
En Banc.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Mr. Chief Justice Hilliard did not participate in the consideration of this cause.
Mr. Justice Hays, Mr. Justice Alter and Mr. Justice Holland are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed, whereas, Mr. Justice Jackson, Mr. Justice Stone and Mr. Justice Moore think that it should be reversed.
The judgment, therefore, must be affirmed by operation of law because of an evenly divided court, and no good purpose would be served by a statement of the issues or the reasons for the conclusions of the several members of the court. Rule 118 (f), R.C.P. Colo.
Judgment affirmed.