Case Name: Frederick Hamilton BANKS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY; Counselor Jackson; Bruce Pearson; Harley Lappin; Larry Randle; Constance Reese; Chaplain Holsten; Chaplain Williams; Correctional Officer Johnson; Jerry Barber, Correctional Officer; Gerald Bratcher; Mccutchon; Southerland; Katheryn Lawson, Doctor; Christopher Curry; Mildred Greer; Eden White; Counselor Griffen; Cameron Lindsey; Marc Renda; Art Roberts; Julie Nicklin; Walter Harris; D. Green; Denise Brewer; Patricia R. Stansberry; Chaplain Zickefoose; Chaplain Robinson, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-10-14
Citations: 333 F. App'x 734
Docket Number: No. 09-6096
Parties: Frederick Hamilton BANKS, Petitioner—Appellant, v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY; Counselor Jackson; Bruce Pearson; Harley Lappin; Larry Randle; Constance Reese; Chaplain Holsten; Chaplain Williams; Correctional Officer Johnson; Jerry Barber, Correctional Officer; Gerald Bratcher; Mccutchon; Southerland; Katheryn Lawson, Doctor; Christopher Curry; Mildred Greer; Eden White; Counselor Griffen; Cameron Lindsey; Marc Renda; Art Roberts; Julie Nicklin; Walter Harris; D. Green; Denise Brewer; Patricia R. Stansberry; Chaplain Zickefoose; Chaplain Robinson, Respondents—Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 333
Pages: 734–735

Head Matter:
Frederick Hamilton BANKS, Petitioner—Appellant, v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY; Counselor Jackson; Bruce Pearson; Harley Lappin; Larry Randle; Constance Reese; Chaplain Holsten; Chaplain Williams; Correctional Officer Johnson; Jerry Barber, Correctional Officer; Gerald Bratcher; Mccutchon; Southerland; Katheryn Lawson, Doctor; Christopher Curry; Mildred Greer; Eden White; Counselor Griffen; Cameron Lindsey; Marc Renda; Art Roberts; Julie Nicklin; Walter Harris; D. Green; Denise Brewer; Patricia R. Stansberry; Chaplain Zickefoose; Chaplain Robinson, Respondents—Appellees.
No. 09-6096.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 20, 2009.
Decided: Oct. 14, 2009.
Frederick Hamilton Banks, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Frederick Hamilton Banks appeals the district court's order denying his petition for writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Banks v. United States Attorney, No. 5:08-hc-02117-BO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 31, 2008). Although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.