Case Name: PEPLOE, Respondent, v. CONNERS, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1900-03-05
Citations: 63 N.Y.S. 1114
Docket Number: 
Parties: PEPLOE, Respondent, v. CONNERS, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 63
Pages: 1114–1114

Head Matter:
PEPLOE, Respondent, v. CONNERS, Appellant.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
March 5, 1900.)
Action by John W. Peploe against Thomas J. Conners. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The record shows that the trial justice found that the plaintiff had done the work in a thorough, workmanlike manner, and therefore the questions propounded to defendant's experts which were disallowed by the trial justice became immaterial. If the work was in fact finished as required by the contract, the questions above referred to were unnecessary. Judgment affirmed, with costs.