Case Name: MABEL KOSTURKO ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, v. JAMES ANTON WISSE, DEFENDANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1929-10-21
Citations: 7 N.J. Misc. 912
Docket Number: 
Parties: MABEL KOSTURKO ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, v. JAMES ANTON WISSE, DEFENDANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 7
Pages: 912–912

Head Matter:
MABEL KOSTURKO ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, v. JAMES ANTON WISSE, DEFENDANT.
Submitted May term, 1929
Decided October 21, 1929.
Before Gummeee, Chief Justice, and Justices Kalisch and Campbell.
Eor the rule, Peter J. McGinnis.
Oontra, Jacob Schneider.

Opinion:
Pee Cueiam.
This was an action seeking to recover damages alleged to have been caused by the negligent operation of a motor car by the defendant. The trial of the issue resulted in a verdict in favor of the defendant below.
By the present rule the plaintiffs seek to have such finding against them set aside for the reason, as urged, that it is against the weight of the evidence.
We conclude that the proofs presented such a question as not to warrant the setting aside of the settlement thereof and finding thereon by the jury.
The rule is therefore discharged.