Case Name: In the Matter of Lindsay Jenkins, Petitioner, v. Thomas J. Dufficy et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2016-02-10
Citations: 136 A.D.3d 818
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Lindsay Jenkins, Petitioner, v Thomas J. Dufficy et al., Respondents.
Judges: Balkin, J.P., Chambers, Cohen and Maltese, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 136
Pages: 818–818

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Lindsay Jenkins, Petitioner, v Thomas J. Dufficy et al., Respondents.
[24 NYS3d 524]

Opinion:
— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent Thomas J. Dufficy, true name Timothy J. Dufficy, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Queens County, to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale of that court entered August 10, 2015, in an action entitled First Am. Intl. Bank v Jenkins, filed under index No. 9748/11, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.
Ordered that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,
Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.
The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act, and only where there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought (see Matter of Legal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County v Scheinman, 53 NY2d 12, 16 [1981]). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.
Balkin, J.P., Chambers, Cohen and Maltese, JJ., concur.