Case Name: Kevin SNODGRASS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. S.L. MESSER; M.L. Counts, Inmate Hearing Officer at ROSP; C. Bishop, C/O at ROSP; E.R. Barksdale, Warden at ROSP; J. Bentley, Investigator at ROSP; Joe Fannin, Lieutenant at ROSP; Tori Raiford, Unit Manager at ROSP; Garry A. Adams, Lieutenant at ROSP; Harold Clark, Director of VA. DOC, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-08-01
Citations: 694 F. App'x 157
Docket Number: No. 17-6360
Parties: Kevin SNODGRASS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. S.L. MESSER; M.L. Counts, Inmate Hearing Officer at ROSP; C. Bishop, C/O at ROSP; E.R. Barksdale, Warden at ROSP; J. Bentley, Investigator at ROSP; Joe Fannin, Lieutenant at ROSP; Tori Raiford, Unit Manager at ROSP; Garry A. Adams, Lieutenant at ROSP; Harold Clark, Director of VA. DOC, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 694
Pages: 157–158

Head Matter:
Kevin SNODGRASS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. S.L. MESSER; M.L. Counts, Inmate Hearing Officer at ROSP; C. Bishop, C/O at ROSP; E.R. Barksdale, Warden at ROSP; J. Bentley, Investigator at ROSP; Joe Fannin, Lieutenant at ROSP; Tori Raiford, Unit Manager at ROSP; Garry A. Adams, Lieutenant at ROSP; Harold Clark, Director of VA. DOC, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 17-6360
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 27, 2017
Decided: August 1, 2017
Kevin Snodgrass, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appel-lees.
Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER. CURIAM:
Kevin Snodgrass, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the rea sons stated by the district court. Snodgrass v. Messer, No. 7:16-cv-00050-EKD-RSB, 2017 WL 975992 (W.D. Va. Mar. 10, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not hid the decisional process,
AFFIRMED