Case Name: Sandra L. MUEGLER, f/k/a Sandra L. Payne, Petitioner/Appellant, v. James Edward PAYNE, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1994-02-01
Citations: 869 S.W.2d 857
Docket Number: No. 63466
Parties: Sandra L. MUEGLER, f/k/a Sandra L. Payne, Petitioner/Appellant, v. James Edward PAYNE, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANE, P.J., and KAROHL and CRAHAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 869
Pages: 857–857

Head Matter:
Sandra L. MUEGLER, f/k/a Sandra L. Payne, Petitioner/Appellant, v. James Edward PAYNE, Respondent/Respondent.
No. 63466.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Feb. 1, 1994.
Frank Joseph Niesen, Jr., St. Louis, Arthur G. Muegler, Jr., Clayton, for petitioner, appellant.
Lawrence G. Gillespie, Eisen, Gillespie, & Hilton, Webster Groves, for respondent, respondent.
Before CRANE, P.J., and KAROHL and CRAHAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner wife appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County in an action to distribute separate property and divide marital property after the parties' marriage was dissolved in Arizona. The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).