Case Name: Betty Marie Kunzie, appellant, v. Edward George Kunzie, appellee
Court: Nebraska Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Nebraska
Decision Date: 1987-02-20
Citations: 224 Neb. 756
Docket Number: No. 85-598
Parties: Betty Marie Kunzie, appellant, v. Edward George Kunzie, appellee.
Judges: Krivosha, C.J., Boslaugh, White, Hastings, Caporale, Shanahan, and Grant, JJ.
Reporter: Nebraska Reports
Volume: 224
Pages: 756–756

Head Matter:
Betty Marie Kunzie, appellant, v. Edward George Kunzie, appellee.
401 N.W.2d 164
Filed February 20, 1987.
No. 85-598.
Gregory N. Lohr, for appellant.
Kurt A. Hohenstein of Rager & Hohenstein, for appellee.
Krivosha, C.J., Boslaugh, White, Hastings, Caporale, Shanahan, and Grant, JJ.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The petitioner wife, Betty Marie Kunzie, appeals from the decree dissolving her marriage to the respondent husband, Edward George Kunzie, on the bases that the trial court erred in its property division, in failing to award alimony, and in the amount of the attorney fee awarded to her. Having reviewed the record de novo as we are required to do, we conclude that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in any regard.
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.
Affirmed.