Case Name: Commonwealth ex rel. Stimer v. Stimer, Appellant
Court: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1927-12-16
Citations: 91 Pa. Super. 586
Docket Number: Appeal No. 376
Parties: Commonwealth ex rel. Stimer v. Stimer, Appellant.
Judges: Before Porter, P. J., Henderson, Trexler, Keller, Linn, Gawthrop and Cunningham, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania Superior Court Reports
Volume: 91
Pages: 586–587

Head Matter:
Commonwealth ex rel. Stimer v. Stimer, Appellant.
Argued December 6,1927.
Before Porter, P. J., Henderson, Trexler, Keller, Linn, Gawthrop and Cunningham, JJ.
Rose and Fischer, for appellant.
No appearance and no printed brief for appellee.
December 16, 1927:

Opinion:
Per Curiam,
A husband appeals from an order requiring him to1 contribute to the support of his wife. He asserts that the court was without jurisdiction because both parties wére living in the same house when complaint was filed and when the order was made. The law is otherwise: Com. v. Nugent, 85 Pa. Superior Ct. 147, 149. The Commonwealth moved to quash the appeal on the ground that it was not taken in time. The order was made February 4, 1927, and the appeal was not taken until November 14, 1927; as the statute requires appeals to be taken within three months, we must grant the motion to quash.
Appeal quashed.