Case Name: STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Dana Scott SCHLIEVE, Defendant and Appellant
Court: North Dakota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: North Dakota
Decision Date: 2018-10-11
Citations: 918 N.W.2d 386
Docket Number: No. 20180108
Parties: STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Dana Scott SCHLIEVE, Defendant and Appellant
Judges: 
Reporter: North Western Reporter 2d
Volume: 918
Pages: 386–387

Head Matter:
STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Dana Scott SCHLIEVE, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20180108
Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Filed October 11, 2018
Faye A. Jasmer, Assistant State's Attorney, Grand Forks, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Kiara C. Kraus-Parr, Grand Forks, ND, for defendant and appellant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Dana Schlieve appealed a district court judgment revoking his probation and sentencing him to five years imprisonment. Schlieve argues the district court erred by not explicitly referencing which sentencing factors under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-32-04 were considered. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). State v. Gonzalez , 2011 ND 143, ¶ 8, 799 N.W.2d 402 (a trial court need not explicitly reference the factors listed under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-32-04 and the factors do not constitute an exclusive list of all a trial court may consider in fixing a criminal sentence).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Jerod E. Tufte
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Zane Anderson, S.J.
[¶3] The Honorable Zane Anderson, S. J., sitting in place of Jensen, J., disqualified.