Case Name: Amy HINMAN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2014-01-16
Citations: 132 So. 3d 1114
Docket Number: No. SC12-2501
Parties: Amy HINMAN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: POLSTON, C.J., and PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 132
Pages: 1114–1114

Head Matter:
Amy HINMAN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. SC12-2501.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Jan. 16, 2014.
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, Maria E. Lauredo, Chief Assistant Public Defender, and Howard K. Blumberg, Assistant Public Defender, Miami, FL, for Petitioner.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, FL, Richard L. Polin, Bureau Chief Criminal Appeals, and Keri T. Jo-sesph, Assistant Attorney General, Miami, FL, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the Third District Court of Appeal in State v. Hinman, 100 So.3d 220 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we have determined that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss this review proceeding.
It is so ordered.
POLSTON, C.J., and PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.
LEWIS, J., dissents.