Case Name: Otto Geisenheim, et al., respondents, v. Charles C. Dodge, et al., appellants
Court: New York Superior Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1884-12-08
Citations: 19 Jones & S. 536
Docket Number: 
Parties: Otto Geisenheim, et al., respondents, v. Charles C. Dodge, et al., appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Reports of cases argued and determined in the Superior Court of the city of New York
Volume: 51
Pages: 536–536

Head Matter:
Otto Geisenheim, et al., respondents, v. Charles C. Dodge, et al., appellants.
Decided December 8, 1884.
Appeal from judgment.
Dill & Chandler, for appellants.
Baldwin & Blackmar, for respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
None of the appellants' exceptions are well taken. The judgment is right, and must be affirmed with costs, on the opinion of the referee, which correctly disposed of the questions involved. Before Sedgwick, Ch. J., Van Vorst and Freedman, JJ. (See ante, p. 169).