Case Name: Daniel GOODIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2017-10-24
Citations: 531 S.W.3d 106
Docket Number: No. ED 104939
Parties: Daniel GOODIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Lisa P. Page, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Philip M. Hess, J. ■
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 531
Pages: 106–106

Head Matter:
Daniel GOODIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 104939
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
FILED: October 24, 2017
FOR APPELLANT: Timothy Forneris, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101.
FOR RESPONDENT: JOSHUA D. HAWLEY, Robert J. (Jeff) Bartholomew, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.
Before Lisa P. Page, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Philip M. Hess, J. ■

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Daniel Goodin ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief, without an evidentiary hearing. Mov-ant pleaded guilty to the class B felony of first-degree burglary, in violation of Section 569.160 (RSMo. 2000). Movant was sentenced to ten years' imprisonment. We affirm the motion court's judgment.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been 'furnished with a memorandum for their' information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).