Case Name: Ryshod Monteke MERCER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2013-12-31
Citations: 428 S.W.3d 660
Docket Number: No. WD 75896
Parties: Ryshod Monteke MERCER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Division Four: JAMES E. WELSH, Chief Judge, Presiding, ALOK AHUJA, Judge and CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 428
Pages: 660–661

Head Matter:
Ryshod Monteke MERCER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 75896.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Dec. 31, 2013.
Laura G. Martin, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
Todd T. Smith, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before Division Four: JAMES E. WELSH, Chief Judge, Presiding, ALOK AHUJA, Judge and CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Ryshod Mercer appeals from the motion court's denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The motion asserted that Mercer received ineffective assistance of counsel in that his attorney assured Mercer that the trial court would sentence him to probation. Mercer claims that he was entitled to a hearing on the Rule 24.035 motion because it alleged facts, not conclusions, that were not refuted by the record and that, if true, would entitled him to relief. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).