Case Name: BERTHA SCHRAMM AND GEORGE SCHRAMM, PLAINTIFFS'-RESPONDENTS, v. ARSENAL ESSO STATION, DEPENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND KRAUSZER'S VENDING, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1973-11-20
Citations: 63 N.J. 593
Docket Number: 
Parties: BERTHA SCHRAMM AND GEORGE SCHRAMM, PLAINTIFFS’RESPONDENTS, v. ARSENAL ESSO STATION, DEPENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND KRAUSZER’S VENDING, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 63
Pages: 593–593

Head Matter:
BERTHA SCHRAMM AND GEORGE SCHRAMM, PLAINTIFFS’RESPONDENTS, v. ARSENAL ESSO STATION, DEPENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND KRAUSZER’S VENDING, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Argued November 5, 1973
Decided November 20, 1973.
Mr. Herbert Klein argued the cause for appellant Kraus-zer’s Vending, Inc. (Messrs. Krieger and Klein, attorneys; Mr. William J. Poilinger on the brief).
Mr. Philip M. Lustbader argued the cause for respondent Arsenal Esso Station. (Philip M. Lustbader, David Lust-bader, a Professional Corporation, attorneys).

Opinion:
Pee Cubiam.
The judgment is affirmed substantally for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division. Schramm v. Arsenal Esso Station and Krauszer's Vending, Inc., reported at 124 N. J. Super. 135 (App. Div. 1973).
For affirmance — Justices Jacobs, Hall, Sullivan, Pash-man and Clieeoed and Judge Coneokd — 6.
Opposed — Hone.