Case Name: Alberto BORJAS, Petitioner, v. Judge George A. BRESCHER, Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-05-22
Citations: 579 So. 2d 399
Docket Number: No. 91-1006
Parties: Alberto BORJAS, Petitioner, v. Judge George A. BRESCHER, Respondent.
Judges: LETTS, GUNTHER and FARMER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 579
Pages: 399–400

Head Matter:
Alberto BORJAS, Petitioner, v. Judge George A. BRESCHER, Respondent.
No. 91-1006.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
May 22, 1991.
Calvin Fox of Tauler & Fox, Miami, for petitioner.
Reid S. Baker of Wakefield & Fulmer, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This petition for writ of prohibition to disqualify the trial judge is granted.
Section 38.10, Florida Statutes, sets up the substantive right to seek disqualification of a trial judge. Brown v. St. George Island, Ltd., 561 So.2d 253, 255 (Fla.1990). Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.432 controls the disqualification procedure in civil cases. Id. Where a motion for disqualification fulfills the procedural requirements of that rule, is supported by a verified statement of specific facts that are reasonably sufficient to create a well-founded fear on the part of a party that he or she will not receive a fair trial, and is timely made, it should be granted. Fischer v. Knuck, 497 So.2d 240, 242 (Fla.1986), and cases cited therein.
Here the procedural requirements were met; counsel's affidavit supported the operative facts set forth in the motion, stating specifically how he came to know those facts; and, taken as true, those facts were reasonably sufficient to generate in petitioner a fear of bias on the part of the trial judge. The facts alleged in such a motion must be taken as true when the motion is supported by the required documentation. See, e.g., Gieseke v. Grossman, 418 So.2d 1055, 1057 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).
LETTS, GUNTHER and FARMER, JJ., concur.