Case Name: MARSHALL ROOFING, INC., Appellant, v. Stanley R. GUMBERG, Trustee, Reliance Insurance Company, Old Republic Insurance Company, and Bruce Hollander, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-03-20
Citations: 671 So. 2d 814
Docket Number: No. 95-0587
Parties: MARSHALL ROOFING, INC., Appellant, v. Stanley R. GUMBERG, Trustee, Reliance Insurance Company, Old Republic Insurance Company, and Bruce Hollander, Appellees.
Judges: GLICKSTEIN, DELL and POLEN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 671
Pages: 814–815

Head Matter:
MARSHALL ROOFING, INC., Appellant, v. Stanley R. GUMBERG, Trustee, Reliance Insurance Company, Old Republic Insurance Company, and Bruce Hollander, Appellees.
No. 95-0587.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
March 20, 1996.
Rehearing Denied April 26, 1996.
Wayne W. Pomeroy of Pomeroy & Pomer-oy, P.A., and Rosemary Wilder of Law Offices of Richard A. Sherman, PA, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
Bohdan Neswiacheny and Glenn J. Web-ber of Law Offices of Bohdan Neswiacheny, Fort Lauderdale, for Appellee-Old Republic Insurance Company.
Ted R. Manry, III, and H. Vance Smith of Macfarlane, Ausley, Ferguson and McMullen, Tampa, for Appellee-Reliance Insurance Company.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The pleadings, depositions and affidavits in the record reveal a genuine issue of material fact as to the intention of the subject agreement; namely, whether appellant was contingently to receive monies pursuant to the agreement in addition to the monies being sought by it through its cross-claim. To this extent we reverse the final judgment and remand for non-jury trial of the issue.
We note, however, that on remand, the question of whether appellant was entitled to a reimbursement of insurance premiums is not to be considered, as this issue was not raised by the pleadings or by the parties.
GLICKSTEIN, DELL and POLEN, JJ., concur.