Case Name: Harold D'O. Baker et al., Respondents, v. William R. Kohler et al., Defendants, and Paul Mishkin et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2002-12-17
Citations: 300 A.D.2d 135
Docket Number: 
Parties: Harold D’O. Baker et al., Respondents, v William R. Kohler et al., Defendants, and Paul Mishkin et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 300
Pages: 135–135

Head Matter:
Harold D’O. Baker et al., Respondents, v William R. Kohler et al., Defendants, and Paul Mishkin et al., Appellants.
[ 751 NYS2d 472 ]

Opinion:
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Lippmann, J.), entered March 27, 2002, which granted plaintiffs' motion to preclude defendant Paul Mishkin from appearing as counsel on behalf of appellants, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Inasmuch as defendant Mishkin, an attorney, has already been called as a witness at trial and is likely to testify again, he was properly precluded from undertaking, in midtrial, to represent appellants by the expedient of having himself designated "of counsel" to the law firm acting as appellants' counsel (see Feygin v Martell, 283 AD2d 304, 305; Zweig v Safeco Ins. Co. of Am., 125 AD2d 205, 206-207; see also Chang v Chang, 190 AD2d 311, 318). Concur — Tom, J.P., Buckley, Friedman, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.