Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pedro GONZALEZ-CARRILLO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1969-08-04
Citations: 411 F.2d 1057
Docket Number: No. 23189
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pedro GONZALEZ-CARRILLO, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 411
Pages: 1057–1057

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pedro GONZALEZ-CARRILLO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 23189.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
Aug. 4, 1969.
Roger M. Hughes, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.
Edwin L. Miller, Jr., U. S. Atty., Joseph A. Milchen, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for appellee.
Before HAMLEY and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges, and BYRNE, District Judge.
Honorable William M. Byrne, United States sitting by designation. District Judge, Central District of California,

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The opinion heretofore filed in this case is withdrawn, and the following opinion is substituted in its place:
Appellant was convicted of violating 21 U.S.C. § 176a. He drove a car across the border from Mexico into the United States. There were 110 bricks of marihuana concealed in the car. Appellant claimed that he did not know that the marihuana was there, and on appeal argues that the evidence is insufficient to support a finding that he did know. We hold that the evidence is sufficient. Rodriguez-Gonzalez v. United States, 9 Cir., 1967, 378 F.2d 256, 259; Aguilar v. United States, 9 Cir., 1966, 363 F.2d 379.
Affirmed.