Case Name: Ernest Fiedler, appellant, vs. Ferdinand Suydam et al., respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1848-06
Citations: 4 How. Pr. 447
Docket Number: 
Parties: Ernest Fiedler, appellant, vs. Ferdinand Suydam et al., respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Howard's Practice Reports
Volume: 4
Pages: 447–447

Head Matter:
Ernest Fiedler, appellant, vs. Ferdinand Suydam et al., respondents.
—Decree affirmed.
Gr. H. Mumford, for appellant;
E. Darwin Smith, for respondents.

Opinion:
This was a cause of claims to surplus moneys brought into court. No particular principle was settled by the decision. It was a question of priority of claims and the amount of interest to be allowed on the surplus, under a certain stipulation with the bank where it was deposited, and who were assignees to the second hen upon the fund. (Not reported.)