Case Name: Manuel Vetti, Jr., Respondent, v. Aubin Contracting & Renovation et al., Defendants, and Hunt Bros. Contractors, Inc., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2003-06-13
Citations: 306 A.D.2d 874
Docket Number: Appeal No. 2
Parties: Manuel Vetti, Jr., Respondent, v Aubin Contracting & Renovation et al., Defendants, and Hunt Bros. Contractors, Inc., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 306
Pages: 874–875

Head Matter:
Manuel Vetti, Jr., Respondent, v Aubin Contracting & Renovation et al., Defendants, and Hunt Bros. Contractors, Inc., Appellant.
(Appeal No. 2.)
[761 NYS2d 903]

Opinion:
—Appeal from a judgment of Supreme Court, Herkimer County (Daley, J.), entered July 31, 2002, which awarded plaintiff a money judgment against defendant Hunt Bros. Contractors, Inc. upon a decision of the court.
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and a new trial is granted.
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment entered in favor of plaintiff against Hunt Bros. Contractors, Inc. (defendant) following a bench trial, defendant contends that Supreme Court erred in admitting in evidence the petrographic analysis and accompanying test results. We agree. That document was hearsay, and plaintiff made no showing that the document was subject to an exception to the hearsay rule (see Wagman v Bradshaw, 292 AD2d 84, 87-88 [2002]; Serra v City of New York, 215 AD2d 643, 644 [1995]). The error cannot be deemed harmless because plaintiff's expert relied upon that document in forming his opinion, and the court rendered its verdict based upon the information contained in that document and based upon the expert's opinion (cf. CPLR 2002). We therefore reverse the judgment and grant a new trial. Present — Pine, J.P., Hurlbutt, Gorski, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.