Case Name: Latasha Lorraine ASKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STARTING POINT; Heather Quenault; Maria Roundtree; Larry Wiseburn, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-10-20
Citations: 585 F. App'x 4
Docket Number: No. 14-1844
Parties: Latasha Lorraine ASKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STARTING POINT; Heather Quenault; Maria Roundtree; Larry Wiseburn, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 585
Pages: 4–4

Head Matter:
Latasha Lorraine ASKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STARTING POINT; Heather Quenault; Maria Roundtree; Larry Wiseburn, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 14-1844.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 16, 2014.
Decided: Oct. 20, 2014.
. Latasha Lorraine Askins, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Edward Justice, Jr., Joseph Jakob Kennedy, Turner Padget Graham & Laney, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Latasha Lorraine Askins appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellees on Askins' complaint alleging employment discrimination. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Askins v. Starting Point, No. 4:12-cv-03547-RBH, 2014 WL 4063036 (D.S.C. Aug. 14, 2014). We also deny Askins' motion to assign counsel.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.