Case Name: Marcos Xavier RAMIREZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. OREGON ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-05-12
Citations: 325 F. App'x 573
Docket Number: No. 08-35232
Parties: Marcos Xavier RAMIREZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. OREGON ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 325
Pages: 573–574

Head Matter:
Marcos Xavier RAMIREZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. OREGON ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 08-35232.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 4, 2009.
Filed May 12, 2009.
Michael Robert Levine, Law Office of Michael R. Levine, Portland, OR, for Petitioner-Appellant.
Ryan P. Kahn, Assistant Attorney General, AGOR-Office of the Oregon Attorney General, Salem, OR, for Respondent-Ap-pellee.
Before: W. FLETCHER, BEA, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Marcos Xavier Ramirez appeals the district court's denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The district court did not err when it denied Ramirez's petition because the state court's denial of post-conviction relief to Ramirez was not "objectively unreasonable." Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 409, 120 S.Ct. 1495, 146 L.Ed.2d 389 (2000). Ramirez failed to show that his attorney's performance was deficient even though his attorney did not object when the prosecutor listed a witness's incentives for telling the truth on the stand. See Strickland, v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.