Case Name: Earl HOLLAND, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-12-22
Citations: 982 S.W.2d 789
Docket Number: No. ED 73809
Parties: Earl HOLLAND, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, J., and MARY RHODES RUSSELL, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 982
Pages: 789–789

Head Matter:
Earl HOLLAND, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 73809.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Dec. 22, 1998.
Paul Yarns, St. Louis, for appellant.
John Munson Morris III, John M. Morris, Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, J., and MARY RHODES RUSSELL, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Earl Holland (Movant) appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. On a previous appeal in this case, this Court remanded for an evidentiary hearing. Holland v. State, 954 S.W.2d 660 (Mo.App.1997). Following the hearing, the court issued a judgment denying Movant's motion, specifically finding Mov-ant's testimony to not be credible.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).