Case Name: Christopher SESTITO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. J.M. HEIRWATER, c/o Stafford County Sheriff's Department, Defendant-Appellant, and Aquia Harbour, Incorporated, a Virginia Corporation; Aquia Harbour Property Owners Association, Inc.; S.C. Debrular, c/o Aquia Harbour Police Department, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-05-13
Citations: 378 F. App'x 258
Docket Number: No. 09-1819
Parties: Christopher SESTITO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. J.M. HEIRWATER, c/o Stafford County Sheriff’s Department, Defendant-Appellant, and Aquia Harbour, Incorporated, a Virginia Corporation; Aquia Harbour Property Owners Association, Inc.; S.C. Debrular, c/o Aquia Harbour Police Department, Defendants.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 378
Pages: 258–258

Head Matter:
Christopher SESTITO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. J.M. HEIRWATER, c/o Stafford County Sheriff’s Department, Defendant-Appellant, and Aquia Harbour, Incorporated, a Virginia Corporation; Aquia Harbour Property Owners Association, Inc.; S.C. Debrular, c/o Aquia Harbour Police Department, Defendants.
No. 09-1819.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 22, 2010.
Decided: May 13, 2010.
Alexander Francuzenko, Zachary A. Kitts, Cook, Kitts & Francuzenko, PLLC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellant. Herbert S. Rosenblumj Herbert S. Rosenblum, A Professional Corporation, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Deputy Sheriff J.M. Heirwater appeals the district court's order denying him qualified immunity and denying his motion for summary judgment in the civil action filed against him. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sestito v. Heirwater, No. 1:09-cv-00065-TSE-IDD (E.D. Va. filed July 10, 2009 & entered July 15, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.