Case Name: JULIA B. GAUSEN et al. v. FRANK J. MOORMANN
Court: Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1897-05
Citations: 5 Ohio N.P. 254
Docket Number: 
Parties: JULIA B. GAUSEN et al. v. FRANK J. MOORMANN.
Judges: 
Reporter: Ohio nisi prius and general term reports
Volume: 5
Pages: 254–255

Head Matter:
(Hamilton County Common Pleas.)
JULIA B. GAUSEN et al. v. FRANK J. MOORMANN.
The administrator of the assignee of a perpetual leasehold is not personally liable to the owner’s of the fee for payment of the rents and taxes covenanted in the lease.
The plaintiffs are the owners of the fee to the property known as the Germania Hotel, which is under a perpetual lease containing covenants to pay rents and taxes, binding upon the lessee, his heirs, executors, administrators and assigns. This lease was assigned to one Wm. Pape, who carried on the hotel business until his death, when he was succeeded in the business by his widow, as administratrix, and subsequently, under authority of the Probate Court, by F. J. Moormann, the present defendant, as administrator de bonis non, who carried on the hotel business for a period of seven months, during wihch time rents accrued to the amount of $1,225 and $305 taxes. Suit was brought by the owners of the fee against Moormaim, as administrator de bonis non, and Moormann, individually.
The question thus presented was as to the individual liability of the administrator of a deceased assignee of a perpetual leasehold containing covenants to pav rents and taxes.

Opinion:
HOLLISTER, J.:
There was no personal liability on the part of the defendant to the plaintiffs. This, for the reason that the estate, divested by the statutes of its chattel qualities, was no longer an asset in the hands of the administrator. The title was in the heir of the deceased, William Pape, subject to the dower rights of his widow, and from the heir the administrator could not take it except for the sole purpose of selling it in the manner prescribed by law to pay the decedent's debts; and he could take the title for this purpose, not as one having any in terest in it, but as a convenient instrument or conduit by whom and through whom the title could be passed from the heir to the purchaser. In this view of the matter the liability to the plaintiffs for rent and taxes attaches to the dowress and the heir as assignees of the lease by operation of law; and .for rents collected by the defendant from portions of the property not used for hotel purposes, he is liable to the heir and dowress, as their agent, or, if such agency is disaffirmed by the minor,then as their tenant.
M. F. Galvin, and E. P. Bradstreet, for plaintiffs.
Wm. L. Avery and F. J. Moormann, contra.
Affirmed by Circuit Court.