Case Name: OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, v. Samuel C. NISSENBAUM, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1982-12-10
Citations: 499 Pa. 224
Docket Number: 
Parties: OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, v. Samuel C. NISSENBAUM, Respondent.
Judges: Before O’BRIEN, C.J., and ROBERTS, NIX, LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT and HUTCHINSON, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 499
Pages: 224–224

Head Matter:
452 A.2d 1020
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, v. Samuel C. NISSENBAUM, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued Oct. 21, 1982.
Decided Dec. 10, 1982.
Stephen H. Serota, Philadelphia, for respondent.
Before O’BRIEN, C.J., and ROBERTS, NIX, LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT and HUTCHINSON, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
There having been issued by this Court a Rule dated February 26, 1982, to show cause why SAMUEL C. NISSENBAUM should not be disbarred from the practice of law, upon consideration of the briefs filed and oral argument presented, it is
ORDERED that the Rule be and is hereby discharged; and it is further
ORDERED that the said SAMUEL C. NISSENBAUM be and is hereby SUSPENDED from the Bar of the Commonwealth for a period of five (5) years commencing June 9, 1978, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.
LARSEN, FLAHERTY and HUTCHINSON, JJ., would disbar.