Case Name: Andrew Cortez CRATER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. George M. GALAZA, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-12-06
Citations: 508 F.3d 1261
Docket Number: No. 05-17027
Parties: Andrew Cortez CRATER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. George M. GALAZA, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before: MELVIN BRUNETTI, DIARMUID F. O’SCANNLAIN, and STEPHEN S. TROTT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 508
Pages: 1261–1270

Head Matter:
Andrew Cortez CRATER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. George M. GALAZA, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 05-17027.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Dec. 6, 2007.
Victor S. Haltom, Esq., Sacramento, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.
Brian Means, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.
Before: MELVIN BRUNETTI, DIARMUID F. O’SCANNLAIN, and STEPHEN S. TROTT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
The panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge of the court requested a vote on whether to rehear the case en banc. However, the en banc call failed to receive a majority of votes of the nonre-cused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
The petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc are denied.