Case Name: STATE EX REL. Eric PAYTON v. STATE of Louisiana
Court: Louisiana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 2018-02-09
Citations: 235 So. 3d 1098
Docket Number: No. 2016-KH-1795
Parties: STATE EX REL. Eric PAYTON v. STATE of Louisiana
Judges: 
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 235
Pages: 1098–1098

Head Matter:
STATE EX REL. Eric PAYTON v. STATE of Louisiana
No. 2016-KH-1795
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
2/9/2018

Opinion:
ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF OUACHITA
• PER CURIAM:
|, Denied. On the showing made, relator is not entitled to an out-of-time appeal. See State v. Counterman, 475 So.2d 336 (La. 1985). By pleading guilty unconditionally, he waived all non-jurisdictional defects in the proceedings leading to his conviction, State v. Crosby, 338 So.2d 584, 586 (La. 1976), and relator cannot appeal or seek review of a sentence imposed in conformity with a plea agreement. La.C.Cr.P, art. 881.2(A)(2).
Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application [^applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.