Case Name: Joseph HATTING and Mary Hatting, Respondents, v. James R. BAUMGARTNER, Mary Ann Baumgartner, and Floyd Wiggins, Appellants
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1988-08-30
Citations: 757 S.W.2d 285
Docket Number: No. WD 39936
Parties: Joseph HATTING and Mary Hatting, Respondents, v. James R. BAUMGARTNER, Mary Ann Baumgartner, and Floyd Wiggins, Appellants.
Judges: Before TURNAGE, P.J., and SHANGLER and MANFORD, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 757
Pages: 285–285

Head Matter:
Joseph HATTING and Mary Hatting, Respondents, v. James R. BAUMGARTNER, Mary Ann Baumgartner, and Floyd Wiggins, Appellants.
No. WD 39936.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Aug. 30, 1988.
Rehearing Denied Oct. 4, 1988.
D. James Mariea of Whitlow, Riley, Mar-iea & Dunlap, P.C., Fulton, for appellants.
Joe D. Holt of Holt, Mays and Brady, Fulton, for respondents.
Before TURNAGE, P.J., and SHANGLER and MANFORD, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Appellants appeal from a decree of the trial court finding respondents to have a prescriptive easement of a roadway across appellants' property and restraining and enjoining appellants from interfering with respondents' peaceful use of this roadway.
The order is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).