Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dwain D. WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-12-18
Citations: 548 F. App'x 606
Docket Number: No. 13-12440
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dwain D. WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILSON, HILL and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 548
Pages: 606–606

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dwain D. WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-12440
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Dec. 18, 2013.
John Alexander Romano, Mi Yung Claire Park, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, James N. Crane, Leah E. McEwen, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Albany, GA, Michael J. Moore, Michelle Lee Schieber, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Macon, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Dwain D. Williams, Tucson, AZ, pro se.
Before WILSON, HILL and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Ingrid Driskell, counsel for Dwain Williams has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion is GRANTED, and Williams's sentences are AFFIRMED.