Case Name: Travis LIKE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-06-17
Citations: 108 S.W.3d 748
Docket Number: No. ED 82114
Parties: Travis LIKE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before PAUL J. SIMON, P.J. and GARY M. GAERTNER, SR. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 108
Pages: 748–749

Head Matter:
Travis LIKE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 82114.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
June 17, 2003.
Craig A. Johnston, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Dora A. Fichter, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before PAUL J. SIMON, P.J. and GARY M. GAERTNER, SR. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Travis Like (movant) appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief -without an evidentia-ry hearing.
Our review of the record on appeal reveals that the motion court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion reciting detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).