Case Name: JOSEPH MULLEN VS. EDWARD F. SANBORN
Court: Baltimore City Court
Jurisdiction: Maryland
Decision Date: 1895-11-22
Citations: 1 Balt. C. Rep. 541
Docket Number: 
Parties: JOSEPH MULLEN VS. EDWARD F. SANBORN.
Judges: 
Reporter: Baltimore city reports, comprising opinions of the various courts of Baltimore city since 1888...
Volume: 1
Pages: 541–542

Head Matter:
BALTIMORE CITY COURT
Filed November 22, 1895.
JOSEPH MULLEN VS. EDWARD F. SANBORN.
Messrs. Henry C. Kennard and Rufus W. Applegarth for plaintiff.
Messrs. Bernard Carter and John Hinkley for defendant.

Opinion:
PHELPS, J.
The Court is of the opinion:
1. That the petition for removal was filed in time.
2. This not being a case where "special bail" is required, the law does not require the bond to be conditional for the party's "appearing and entering special bail."
3. The party has the right at this stage to remove, and the question of res adjudieata (as to the validity of process), as well as all other issues involved, must necessarily be left to the jurisdiction invoked.