Case Name: Shelley BRINSON, Petitioner, v. MIMS & THOMAS MANUFACTURING CO., Employer, Bituminous Casualty Corporation, Carrier, and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1966-05-04
Citations: 186 So. 2d 495
Docket Number: No. 35008
Parties: Shelley BRINSON, Petitioner, v. MIMS & THOMAS MANUFACTURING CO., Employer, Bituminous Casualty Corporation, Carrier, and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
Judges: THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 186
Pages: 495–496

Head Matter:
Shelley BRINSON, Petitioner, v. MIMS & THOMAS MANUFACTURING CO., Employer, Bituminous Casualty Corporation, Carrier, and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
No. 35008.
Supreme Court of Florida.
May 4, 1966.
Joseph Rosenkrantz, Theodore M. Trush-in, Miami Beach and F. Perry Odom of Er-vin, Pennington, Varn & Jacobs, Tallahassee, for petitioner.
Rose & Marlow, Miami, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date November 17, 1965.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essen-" tial requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
The petition for attorney's fees is also denied.
It is so ordered.
THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, O'CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.