Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Guillermo TORRES-MENCHACA, also known as Guillermo Torres, also known as Guillermo Menchaca Torres, also known as Guillermo Mechaca Torres, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-10-20
Citations: 333 F. App'x 880
Docket Number: No. 09-20350
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Guillermo TORRES-MENCHACA, also known as Guillermo Torres, also known as Guillermo Menchaca Torres, also known as Guillermo Mechaca Torres, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 333
Pages: 880–881

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Guillermo TORRES-MENCHACA, also known as Guillermo Torres, also known as Guillermo Menchaca Torres, also known as Guillermo Mechaca Torres, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-20350
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Oct. 20, 2009.
James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Laura Fletcher Leavitt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Guillermo Torres-Menchaca raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Ayala, 542 F.3d 494, 495 (5th Cir.2008), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 1388, 173 L.Ed.2d 639 (2009), which held that a violation of Texas Penal Code § 21.11(a) constitutes the offense of sexual abuse of a minor, justifying a U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) offense level increase. The Government's motion for summary af-firmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.