Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Arthur STALLINGS, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-06-29
Citations: 998 S.W.2d 128
Docket Number: No. 75027
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Arthur STALLINGS, Appellant.
Judges: Before JAMES A. PUDLOWSKI, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, Jr., and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 998
Pages: 128–128

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Arthur STALLINGS, Appellant.
No. 75027.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
June 29, 1999.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 29, 1999.
Application for Transfer Denied Sept. 21, 1999.
Jennifer S. Walsh, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Karen Pope Butler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before JAMES A. PUDLOWSKI, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, Jr., and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant Arthur Stallings appeals the judgment and sentence entered following his jury convictions for first degree robbery and armed criminal action in violation of sections 569.020 and 571.015, RSMo 1994, respectively. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).