Case Name: Cecil TINER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE OF ALABAMA, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1975-04-03
Citations: 510 F.2d 1363
Docket Number: No. 74-3835
Parties: Cecil TINER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE OF ALABAMA, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before THORNBERRY, MORGAN and RONEY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 510
Pages: 1363–1363

Head Matter:
Cecil TINER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE OF ALABAMA, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 74-3835
Summary Calendar.*
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 3, 1975.
Emily Gassenheimer, Montgomery, Ala. (Court appointed), for petitioner-appellant.
William J. Baxley, Atty. Gen., David W. Clark, Asst. Atty. Gen., Montgomery, Ala., for respondent-appellee.
Before THORNBERRY, MORGAN and RONEY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The summary judgment rendered below is vacated and this cause remanded for a hearing to determine whether the appellant deliberately bypassed his state remedies. Should the district court find that appellant did not deliberately bypass such remedies, the constitutional questions presented by the appellant's petition for habeas corpus warrant a full hearing on the merits.