Case Name: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Mark Thomas WARDELL, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1994-09-22
Citations: 642 So. 2d 745
Docket Number: No. 83280
Parties: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Mark Thomas WARDELL, Respondent.
Judges: GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, HARDING and WELLS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 642
Pages: 745–745

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Mark Thomas WARDELL, Respondent.
No. 83280.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Sept. 22, 1994.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Wesley Heidt, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for petitioner.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender and Kenneth Witts, Asst. Public Defender, Day-tona Beach, for respondent.

Opinion:
KOGAN, Justice.
We have for review Wardell v. State, 631 So.2d 1130, 1131 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994), in which the district court certified the following question as being of great public importance:
MUST A TRIAL COURT, UPON REVOCATION OF PROBATION, CREDIT PREVIOUS TIME SERVED ON PROBATION TOWARD ANY NEWLY-IMPOSED TERM OF PROBATION SO THAT THE TOTAL PROBATIONARY TERM IS SUBJECT TO THE STATUTORY MAXIMUM FOR A SINGLE OFFENSE?
We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4) of the Florida Constitution.
We have answered the same question in the affirmative State v. Summers, 642 So.2d 742 (Fla.1994). Because the decision under review is in harmony with our decision in Summers, we approve it.
It is so ordered.
GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, HARDING and WELLS, JJ., concur.