Case Name: Tom BOOKER et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. R. B. HATCH, Defendant in Error
Court: Texas Courts of Civil Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1927-02-17
Citations: 291 S.W. 1119
Docket Number: No. 7037
Parties: Tom BOOKER et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. R. B. HATCH, Defendant in Error.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 291
Pages: 1119–1119

Head Matter:
Tom BOOKER et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. R. B. HATCH, Defendant in Error.
(No. 7037.)
(Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Austin.
Feb. 17, 1927.
Rehearing Denied March 9, 1927.)
Ross Huffmaster,' of Kaufman, for plaintiffs in. error.
Wynne & Wynne, of Kaufman, for defendant in error.
Writ of error dismissed for want of jurisdiction April 27, 1927.

Opinion:
McCLENDON, C. J.
Suit by defendants in error, referred to as plaintiffs, against plaintiffs in error, referred to as defendants, in trespass to try title to recover a 10-acre tract of land. Trial to jury upon special issues. Verdiet and judgment for plaintiffs. Defendants seek review by writ of error. Plaintiffs have presented no assignment of error in their briefs, as the rules of briefing require. We have examined the record, anj it presents no fundamental error, if in fact any error at all. The trial court's judgment is accordingly affirmed.