Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Richard J. EICHELBERGER, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-04-12
Citations: 160 S.W.3d 417
Docket Number: No. ED 83872
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Richard J. EICHELBERGER, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 160
Pages: 417–417

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Richard J. EICHELBERGER, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 83872.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
April 12, 2005.
Irene C. Earns, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Deborah Daniels, Alison K. Brown, co-counsel, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant, Richard Eichelberger, appeals from the judgment entered pursuant to his conviction by a jury of second degree trafficking, in violation of Section 195.223 RSMo (2000), for which he was sentenced to ten years imprisonment. He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence as to quantity and asserts the trial court erred in: (1) overruling his motions for judgment of acquittal at the close of the State's case and at the close of all the evidence; (2) submitting the case to the jury; (3) accepting the verdict of guilty; and (4) sentencing him to a term of ten years imprisonment.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. A detailed opinion would be of no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a brief memorandum opinion, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).