Case Name: In the Matter of Lenny V., Appellant. Chautauqua County Attorney, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1998-02-04
Citations: 247 A.D.2d 919
Docket Number: Appeal No. 2
Parties: In the Matter of Lenny V., Appellant. Chautauqua County Attorney, Respondent.
Judges: Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Hayes, Balio and Boehm, JJ.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 247
Pages: 919–919

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Lenny V., Appellant. Chautauqua County Attorney, Respondent.
(Appeal No. 2.)
[668 NYS2d 535]

Opinion:
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Based upon respondent's history of antisocial behavior, truancy and inadequate parental supervision, Family Court properly exercised its discretion in determining that placement at a New York State Division for Youth facility was the "least restrictive available alternative" (Family Ct Act § 352.2 [2] [a]; see, Matter of Katherine W., 62 NY2d 947; Matter of Quentin L., 231 AD2d 890; Matter of Edward V., 204 AD2d 1060). (Appeal from Order of Chautauqua County Family Court, Hartley, J. — Violation of Probation.)
Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Hayes, Balio and Boehm, JJ.