Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Melvin E. HOWARD, a/k/a Mu, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-11-23
Citations: 352 F. App'x 827
Docket Number: No. 09-6987
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Melvin E. HOWARD, a/k/a Mu, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 352
Pages: 827–827

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Melvin E. HOWARD, a/k/a Mu, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 09-6987.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 17, 2009.
Decided: Nov. 23, 2009.
Melvin E. Howard, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Melvin E. Howard appeals the district court's order granting his motion for reduction of sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We find no reversible error and we thus affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Howard, No. 5:95-cr-00123-BO-10 (E.D.N.C. May 20, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.