Case Name: Thomas A. LEE, III, Louise Mack and Louie Hampton, et al., v. Howard J. SHAW, John R. Shaw, Jr., et al., Appellants
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2007-02-23
Citations: 948 So. 2d 1038
Docket Number: No. 5D06-1046
Parties: Thomas A. LEE, III, Louise Mack and Louie Hampton, et al., v. Howard J. SHAW, John R. Shaw, Jr., et al., Appellants,
Judges: GRIFFIN, ORFINGER and LAWSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 948
Pages: 1038–1039

Head Matter:
Thomas A. LEE, III, Louise Mack and Louie Hampton, et al., v. Howard J. SHAW, John R. Shaw, Jr., et al., Appellants,
No. 5D06-1046.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Feb. 23, 2007.
Robert W. Bauer, of Clayton-Johnston, P.A., Gainesville, for Appellant.
John R. Stiefel, Jr., and Bethany Ray Reichard, of Holbrook, Akel, Cold, Stiefel & Ray, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We are bound to agree with appellants that the affidavit offered in support of the motion for summary judgment was insufficient for the trial court to determine the legal and factual issues contained in the judgment, including the conclusion that the property at issue is not subject to partition.
On this record, we express no opinion concerning whether the property is subject to partition in whole or in part. Nor can we conclude on this record whether the appointment of a commission is required.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
GRIFFIN, ORFINGER and LAWSON, JJ., concur.