Case Name: Everett BAKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2003-09-19
Citations: 854 So. 2d 828
Docket Number: No. 5D03-2689
Parties: Everett BAKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: THOMPSON, MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 854
Pages: 828–828

Head Matter:
Everett BAKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D03-2689.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Sept. 19, 2003.
Everett Baker, Lake Butler, pro se.
No appearance for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Everett Baker appeals the summary denial of his rule 3.850 motion and his amended motion. We affirm.
Mr. Everett was tried and convicted of solicitation to deliver cocaine and tampering with physical evidence. He asserts that his trial counsel was ineffective in his representation in four different ways. Without detailing each of the claims, what is quite clear is that in each instance Mr. Everett has failed to allege specific facts that are not conclusively rebutted by the record, and which demonstrate a deficiency in performance that prejudiced the defense. See Jones v. State, 845 So.2d 55, 65 (Fla.2003).
AFFIRMED.
THOMPSON, MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.