Case Name: Robert E. KELTNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Holmes R. SHAVER, individually and as President of the Wood County Commission; David A. Couch, individually and as member of the Wood . County Commission; Robert K. Tebay, individually and as member of the Wood County Commission; Keith Litton, individually and as a duly appointed officer of the Wood County Commission; Michael Balzano; Louis Balzano, d/b/a Eddies Auto Parts Company, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-02-21
Citations: 29 F. App'x 177
Docket Number: No. 01-2370
Parties: Robert E. KELTNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Holmes R. SHAVER, individually and as President of the Wood County Commission; David A. Couch, individually and as member of the Wood . County Commission; Robert K. Tebay, individually and as member of the Wood County Commission; Keith Litton, individually and as a duly appointed officer of the Wood County Commission; Michael Balzano; Louis Balzano, d/b/a Eddies Auto Parts Company, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 29
Pages: 177–177

Head Matter:
Robert E. KELTNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Holmes R. SHAVER, individually and as President of the Wood County Commission; David A. Couch, individually and as member of the Wood . County Commission; Robert K. Tebay, individually and as member of the Wood County Commission; Keith Litton, individually and as a duly appointed officer of the Wood County Commission; Michael Balzano; Louis Balzano, d/b/a Eddies Auto Parts Company, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 01-2370.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 14, 2002.
Decided Feb. 21, 2002.
Robert E. Keltner, Pro Se. Mark William Browning, Shuman, McCluskey & Sheer, P.L.L.C., Charleston, West Virginia; David Edward Schumacher, Schumacher, Francis & Nelson, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Robert E. Keltner appeals two separate district court orders granting the Appellees' motions for summary judgment on his civil action alleging that various vehicles were improperly removed from his property. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Keltner v. Shaver; No. CA-00-1162-6 (S.D.W.Va. filed Oct. 12, 2001; entered Oct. 15, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.