Case Name: In the Matter of Esther H., Respondent, v. Eddie H., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2010-11-18
Citations: 78 A.D.3d 526
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Esther H., Respondent, v Eddie H., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 78
Pages: 526–527

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Esther H., Respondent, v Eddie H., Appellant.
[910 NYS2d 648]

Opinion:
Order, Family Court, New York County (Carol J. Goldstein, Ref.), entered on or about October 13, 2009, which, upon a determination, after a fact-finding hearing, that respondent committed the family offenses of menacing in the second and third degrees, reckless endangerment in the second degree, disorderly conduct, and harassment in the second degree, granted peti tioner a two-year order of protection against respondent, unanimously modified, on the law, to vacate the finding of harassment in the second degree, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
The Referee having properly struck petitioner's testimony as to a course of harassing conduct committed by respondent that had been alleged and adjudicated in a prior proceeding, the evidence was legally insufficient to establish harassment in the second degree under Penal Law § 240.26 (3) (see People v Wood, 59 NY2d 811, 812 [1983]). The Referee's remaining findings were supported by a fair preponderance of the evidence.
The Referee properly denied respondent's motion for a mistrial based on the ruling that the evidence of a course of harassing conduct would not be considered in the fact-finding determination, because respondent was not prejudiced by that ruling. Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Nardelli, Acosta and DeGrasse, JJ.