Case Name: David E. BROWN, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Michael T. MALONEY, et al., Defendants, Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-07-27
Citations: 104 F. App'x 759
Docket Number: No. 03-1521
Parties: David E. BROWN, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Michael T. MALONEY, et al., Defendants, Appellees.
Judges: Before TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge, STAHL, Senior Circuit Judge, and LYNCH, Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 104
Pages: 759–760

Head Matter:
David E. BROWN, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Michael T. MALONEY, et al., Defendants, Appellees.
No. 03-1521.
United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
July 27, 2004.
David E. Brown, on brief, pro se.
Nancy Ankers White, Special Assistant Attorney General, and Kevin A. Anahory, Legal Division, Department of Correction, on brief, for appellees.
Before TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge, STAHL, Senior Circuit Judge, and LYNCH, Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
After carefully considering the briefs and record on appeal, we affirm for substantially the reasons stated by the district court. Among other considerations, the appellant failed to state a claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act, 42 U.S.C. § 749; Parker v. Universidad de Puerto Rico, 225 F.3d 1, 4 (1st Cir.2000). The court did not abuse its discretion in denying his second motion to amend his complaint. Mirpuri v. ACT Mfg., Inc., 212 F.3d 624 (1st Cir. 2000).
Affirmed. 1st Cir. R. 27(c).