Case Name: Donna STUCCHIO, Appellant, v. Leslie R. HUFFSTETLER, Jr., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1997-04-04
Citations: 690 So. 2d 753
Docket Number: No. 96-2655
Parties: Donna STUCCHIO, Appellant, v. Leslie R. HUFFSTETLER, Jr., Appellee.
Judges: DAUKSCH and W. SHARP, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 690
Pages: 753–754

Head Matter:
Donna STUCCHIO, Appellant, v. Leslie R. HUFFSTETLER, Jr., Appellee.
No. 96-2655.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
April 4, 1997.
Yveline F. Paul of Paul & Associates, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.
Leslie R. Huffstetler, Jr., Spring Hill, pro se.

Opinion:
GOSHORN, Judge.
Donna Stuechio appeals the order dismissing Counts I and III of her third amended complaint with prejudice. She contends, correctly, that the court impermissibly considered matters outside the four corners of the complaint in deciding the motion to dismiss. See Cazares v. Church of Scientolo gy of California, Inc., 444 So.2d 442 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). Further, defenses to the action may not be considered in deciding a motion to dismiss. Pizzi v. Central Bank & Trust Co., 250 So.2d 895 (Fla.1971). Thus, while the ruling may ultimately prove correct, it was error to decide the merits of the case on a dismissal motion.
REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.
DAUKSCH and W. SHARP, JJ., concur.