Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Yulian CARILLO-TAMAYO, a/k/a Frank, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-02-26
Citations: 633 F. App'x 192
Docket Number: No. 15-7783
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Yulian CARILLO-TAMAYO, a/k/a Frank, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 633
Pages: 192–192

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Yulian CARILLO-TAMAYO, a/k/a Frank, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-7783.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 23, 2016.
Decided: Feb. 26, 2016.
Yulian Carillo-Tamayo, Appellant Pro Se. Stanley D. Ragsdale, Jane Barrett Taylor, Assistant United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Yulian Carillo-Tamayo appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Carillo-Tamayo, No. 5:12-cr-00563-MBS-2 (D.S.C. Oct. 26, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.