Case Name: Richard NAGEL, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-07-13
Citations: 763 So. 2d 319
Docket Number: No. SC96900
Parties: Richard NAGEL, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 763
Pages: 319–320

Head Matter:
Richard NAGEL, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. SC96900.
Supreme Court of Florida.
July 13, 2000.
Charles W. Musgrove, West Palm Beach, FL, for Petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Celia A. Terenzio, Bureau Chief, and Joseph A. Tringali, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, FL, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have for review Nagel v. State, 789 So.2d 1242 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), because it cited as controlling authority Goodwin v. State, 721 So.2d 728 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), approved in part, disapproved in part, 751 So.2d 537 (Fla.1999). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418, 420 (Fla.1981). We quash the decision below and remand for further proceedings in light of our opinion in Goodwin v. State, 751 So.2d 537 (Fla.1999).
It is so ordered.
SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
WELLS, C.J., dissents.