Case Name: Joseph D. and Monica H. Corcoran v. Village of Bennington et al
Court: Vermont Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Vermont
Decision Date: 1968-12-04
Citations: 127 Vt. 323
Docket Number: 
Parties: Joseph D. and Monica H. Corcoran v. Village of Bennington et al
Judges: Present: Shangraw, Barney, Smith, Keyser, JJ., and Larrow, Supr. J.
Reporter: Vermont Reports
Volume: 127
Pages: 323–323

Head Matter:
Joseph D. and Monica H. Corcoran v. Village of Bennington et al
[ 248 A.2d 730 ]
October Term, 1968
Present: Shangraw, Barney, Smith, Keyser, JJ., and Larrow, Supr. J.
Opinion Filed December 4, 1968
Loveland & Hackel for the Petitioner.
Milton Pinsker, Esq., for the Petitionees.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This is a petition for mandamus. The argument in support of the demurrer filed by the defendants was based on facts and matters not pleaded. It also developed at the hearing before this Court that the plaintiffs had not joined a party concededly essential. In view of these shortcomings, the matter ought not to be disposed of in its present situation.
The demurrer is overruled, with leave to the defendants to file additional pleadings within fifteen days of this entry, if they be so advised.
Leave is also afforded the plaintiffs to file such additional or responsive pleadings, including the citing in of any necessary additional parties, as they may be advised, not later than thirty days after this entry.