Case Name: Petition of COLBURN. In re MLLE. LEMAUD, Inc.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1926-12-31
Citations: 16 F.2d 780
Docket Number: No. 2048, Original
Parties: Petition of COLBURN. In re MLLE. LEMAUD, Inc.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 16
Pages: 780–781

Head Matter:
Petition of COLBURN. In re MLLE. LEMAUD, Inc.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
December 31, 1926.)
No. 2048, Original.
A. B. Tolman, of Lynn, Mass., for petitioner.
Samuel J. Freedman, of Boston, Mass., for respondent.
Before BINGHAM, JOHNSON, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
JOHNSON, Circuit Judge.
This is a petition to revise in matter of law the decree of the District Court of the United States, for the District of Massachusetts (13 F.[2d] 208), vacating an order of the referee in. bankruptcy, and directing the trustee in bankruptcy to pay to the petitioner $200 for rent of the premises described in the petition for 16 days during which they were occupied by a receiver.
On September 9, 1922, an involuntary petition in bankruptcy was filed against Mile. Lemaud, Inc. The record does not disclose when there was an adjudication upon the petition, but presumably at the date of the.appointment of a receiver, October 10, 1922.
The petitioner is the owner of the premises occupied by the bankrupt, under a lease from him which contained a provision that, in case the lessee should be declared a bankrupt, the lessor might enter upon the demised premises and repossess the same.
The receiver entered into possession of the demised premises on October 12, 1922, and disposed of the stock there, continuing his possession for this purpose until October 28, 1922, and then vacating.
The lessor did not enter upon lessee's being adjudicated a bankrupt, as he might have done, but on November 18,1922, filed a claim for rent from the date of filing the petition, September 9, 1922, down to the time when the premises were vacated by the receiver. This claim was allowed by the referee, but upon review the District Court held that the petitioner was entitled to recover rent for only the time the premises were occupied by the receiver.
The record does not disclose -that the receiver made any agreement with the landlord respecting payment of rent during his occupancy, nor that the trustee elected to take over the lease as beneficial to the bankrupt estate. It is the law in this circuit that the lease was not terminated' by bankruptcy without an entry by the lessor for the purpose of repossessing the premises under the terms of the lease. While the bankrupt's stock was in the custody of the bankruptcy court from the date of the filing of the petition, the bankrupt continued to be in possession of the demised premises under the lease, and bound by its covenants. In re Ells (D. C.) 98 F. 967. The lessor was entitled to reasonable rent for the use and occupation of the premises by the receiver, usually the rent reserved in the lease, unless that is unreasonable. In re Adams Cloak, Suit & Fur House (D. C.) 199 F. 337. In the Matter of Crawford Plummer Co. (D. C.) 253 F. 76; Fleming v. Noble et al. (C. C. A.) 250 F. 733; Gardner v. Gleason (C. C. A.) 259 F. 755.
The order of the District Court is affirmed, with costs in this court to the trustee in bankruptcy.