Case Name: Patricio NINO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2003-04-23
Citations: 843 So. 2d 347
Docket Number: No. 3D03-482
Parties: Patricio NINO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GREEN and WELLS, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 843
Pages: 347–347

Head Matter:
Patricio NINO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D03-482.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 23, 2003.
Patricio Nino, for appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General and Mark Rosenblatt, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GREEN and WELLS, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
In what we treat as a motion to correct judgment raised by way of a petition for writ of habeas corpus, Patricio Nino asserts that his judgment improperly reflects that he was convicted of a weapons violation in connection with his kidnaping conviction. The kidnaping conviction on the judgment makes reference to both the kid-naping statute, section 787.01, Fla. Stat. (1995), and the weapons and aggravated battery reclassification statute, section 775.087, Fla. Stat. (1995). The state properly concedes that Nino was neither charged with nor convicted of using a weapon or committing an aggravated battery during the kidnaping. For this reason, we remand with directions that the references to section 775.087 be deleted from the judgment. We otherwise find no illegality or impropriety to the judgment and deny the petition.
Petition denied but remanded with directions.