Case Name: Kathleen WRIGHT, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Millard B. WRIGHT, Appellee/Cross-Appellant
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1987-06-30
Citations: 509 So. 2d 334
Docket Number: No. 86-22
Parties: Kathleen WRIGHT, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Millard B. WRIGHT, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL, HENDRY, HUBBART, NESBITT, BASKIN, DANIEL S. PEARSON, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 509
Pages: 334–334

Head Matter:
Kathleen WRIGHT, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Millard B. WRIGHT, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
No. 86-22.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
June 30, 1987.
Mark E. Pollack, Miami, for appellant/cross-appellee.
Fred E. Glickman, Miami, for appel-lee/cross-appellant.
Elizabeth S. Baker, South Miami, for the National Organization for Women, as ami-cus curiae.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL, HENDRY, HUBBART, NESBITT, BASKIN, DANIEL S. PEARSON, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The court hereby certifies to the Supreme Court of Florida that this cause passes upon the following question of great public importance:
May the trial court consider the wife's forfeiture of alimony upon remarriage as a factor in determining "whether alimony will be awarded and the amount of alimony," upon dissolution of the subsequent marriage?