Case Name: Roberto G. ORDONEZ-MEDINA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2006-12-27
Citations: 944 So. 2d 550
Docket Number: No. 3D05-88
Parties: Roberto G. ORDONEZ-MEDINA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before WELLS and SUAREZ, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 944
Pages: 550–551

Head Matter:
Roberto G. ORDONEZ-MEDINA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D05-88.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 27, 2006.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Gwendolyn Powell Braswell, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Angel L. Fleming, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before WELLS and SUAREZ, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Irizarry v. State, 905 So.2d 160 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (trial court's ruling on a motion for judgment of acquittal is affirmed on appeal if a rational trier of fact could find the existence of the elements of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt), review denied, 917 So.2d 194 (Fla.2005); Lee v. State, 869 So.2d 1251 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) (admission of hearsay harmless beyond a reasonable doubt where it was cumulative of other evidence).