Case Name: THE GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, Relator, v. Honorable Samuel P. WILLSON, Chief Justice, et al., Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Texas
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1932-01-06
Citations: 45 S.W.2d 554
Docket Number: Motion No. 9935
Parties: THE GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, Relator, v. Honorable Samuel P. WILLSON, Chief Justice, et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 45
Pages: 554–554

Head Matter:
THE GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, Relator, v. Honorable Samuel P. WILLSON, Chief Justice, et al., Respondents.
Motion No. 9935.
Supreme Court of Texas.
Jan. 6, 1932.
Touchstone, Wight, Gormley & Price and Robert B. Holland, all of Dallas, for relator.^

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The relator has a complete remedy secured by writ of error by articles 1$21 and 1728, Rev. Stat. Mandamus will no longer lie to require the Court of Civil Appeals to certify the question of conflict in this character of case; the former practice was based on the absence of such remedy. International & G. N. R. Co. v. Pleasants, 116 Tex. 568, 296 S. W. 282.
The motion for leave to file petition for mandamus is therefore refused.