Case Name: Emma DONALD, Appellant, v. BEATRICE CHEESE and Division of Employment Security, Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-07-11
Citations: 21 S.W.3d 895
Docket Number: No. ED 77130
Parties: Emma DONALD, Appellant, v. BEATRICE CHEESE and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J., PAUL J. SIMON, J., and JAMES R. DOWD, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 21
Pages: 895–896

Head Matter:
Emma DONALD, Appellant, v. BEATRICE CHEESE and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.
No. ED 77130.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
July 11, 2000.
Emma Donald, St. Louis, pro se.
Larry R. Ruhmann, St. Louis, for respondents.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J., PAUL J. SIMON, J., and JAMES R. DOWD, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Emma Donald, ("claimant"), appeals the judgment of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission in favor of respondents, Beatrice Cheese and Division of Employment Security, ("respondents"), finding claimant was disqualified for unemployment benefits because she left work with her employer voluntarily, without good cause attributable to her work or her employer. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcripts, and find the denial of benefits is supported by substantial and competent evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence based on the record as a whole. Claimant failed to meet her burden of proof, i.e., she failed to show a right to benefits. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).