Case Name: Phillip GOODWIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2007-09-18
Citations: 233 S.W.3d 234
Docket Number: No. ED 89016
Parties: Phillip GOODWIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J. and GLENN A. NORTON, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 233
Pages: 234–235

Head Matter:
Phillip GOODWIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 89016.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Sept. 18, 2007.
S. Kristina Starke, Assistant Public Defender, Saint Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jaime Wilson Corman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J. and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Phillip Goodwin appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Goodwin argues that his trial counsel was ineffective in cross-examining three of the State's witnesses. The motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
. All references to Rules are to Missouri Supreme Court Rules (2007).