Case Name: Kathryn DUVALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HONEYWELL TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INCORPORATED, a Delaware Corporation; Honeywell International, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-06-23
Citations: 282 F. App'x 227
Docket Number: No. 08-1304
Parties: Kathryn DUVALL, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. HONEYWELL TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INCORPORATED, a Delaware Corporation; Honeywell International, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 282
Pages: 227–227

Head Matter:
Kathryn DUVALL, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. HONEYWELL TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INCORPORATED, a Delaware Corporation; Honeywell International, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 08-1304.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 19, 2008.
Decided: June 23, 2008.
Kathryn Duvall, Appellant Pro Se. Margaret League Boylston, Peters, Murdaugh, Parker, Eltzroth & Detrick, PA, Hampton, South Carolina, Benjamin Phillip Glass, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, PC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Kathryn Duvall appeals the district court's order granting Defendant's summary judgment motion on her defamation claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. See Duvall v. Honeywell Tech. Solutions, Inc., No. 2:06-cv-03544-CWH, 2008 WL 350999 (D.S.C. filed Feb. 6, 2008; entered Feb. 8, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Although Duvall summarily requests an order redacting all of her personal information and work history from the court's records, as well as an order sealing the court's records, because she has not established she is entitled to this relief, we deny Duvall's requests.