Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shane Travis WARRANT, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-02-26
Citations: 314 F. App'x 85
Docket Number: No. 08-30192
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Shane Travis WARRANT, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: BEEZER, FERNANDEZ, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 314
Pages: 85–85

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Shane Travis WARRANT, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 08-30192.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 18, 2009.
Filed Feb. 26, 2009.
Paulette Lynn Stewart, Assistant U.S., USHE-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Helena, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Andrew J. Nelson, Esquire, Mudd Nelson, Missoula, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: BEEZER, FERNANDEZ, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Shane Travis Warrant appeals from the district court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Warrant contends that the district court erred when it denied his motion to suppress because evidence obtained during a traffic stop was seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment. Warrant waived the right to appeal this issue when he entered an unconditional guilty plea. See United States v. Lopez-Armenta, 400 F.3d 1173, 1175 (9th Cir.2005).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.