Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Lindell BLACK, Appellant; Lindell BLACK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1996-12-03
Citations: 935 S.W.2d 83
Docket Number: No. 68167
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Lindell BLACK, Appellant. Lindell BLACK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 935
Pages: 83–84

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Lindell BLACK, Appellant. Lindell BLACK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 68167.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Dec. 3, 1996.
Renae Adamson, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Christine M. Blegen, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Lindell Black, appeals the judgment of conviction for unlawful use of a weapon, RSMo § 571.030.1(4) (Cum.Supp. 1993), entered by the Circuit Court of St. Francois County after a jury trial, and appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment of conviction is supported by sufficient evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. We further find the judgment denying the Rule 29.15 motion is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.