Case Name: Samuel CALIXTE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2017-10-18
Citations: 228 So. 3d 150
Docket Number: No. 4D17-0069
Parties: Samuel CALIXTE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Ciklin, Conner'And Klingensmith, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 228
Pages: 150–150

Head Matter:
Samuel CALIXTE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D17-0069
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
[October 18, 2017]
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Benjamin Eisenberg, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melynda Melear, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
CONCESSION OF ERROR
Per Curiam.
On appeal, Appellant argues the trial court erred by imposing an upward departure sentence without articulating any grounds to justify the departure at re-sentencing. Based on the State's proper concession of error, we agree that the trial court erred by not articulating any findings to. support departure from .the permitted deviated sentence range as recommended by the original sentencing guidelines. See Bryant v. State, 148 So.3d 1251, 1256 (Fla. 2014) (citing Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554, 555 (Fla. 1990)); Boynton v. State, 473 So.2d 703, 704 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), approved, 478 So.2d 351 (Fla. 1985). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for resentencing.
Reversed and Remanded.
Ciklin, Conner'And Klingensmith, JJ., concur.