Case Name: Kenny Layne HILLMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1994-04-29
Citations: 636 So. 2d 181
Docket Number: No. 93-1677
Parties: Kenny Layne HILLMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: DIAMANTIS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 636
Pages: 181–181

Head Matter:
Kenny Layne HILLMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 93-1677.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
April 29, 1994.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and James T. Cook, Asst. Public Defender, Day-tona Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Rebecca Roark Wall, Asst. Atty, Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
W. SHARP, Judge.
Hillman appeals a special condition of his three-year probationary sentence, after he pled nolo contendere to burglary of a structure. Hillman argues the trial court erred in setting a provision which requires restitution to be payable at a rate determined by his probation officer. We reverse because this court has held that it is improper for anyone other than a judge to set a payment schedule for amounts owed in restitution. Casto v. State, 615 So.2d 792 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Boss v. State, 613 So.2d 525 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993).
Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the trial court to set a payout rate on the restitution.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
DIAMANTIS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
. Section 810.02(3), Fla.Stat. (1989)