Case Name: Arlen of Nanuet, Inc., et al., Appellants, v. State of New York, Respondent; Bernard S. Siegel et al., Respondents, v. State of New York, Respondent; Lake Nanuet Corporation, Respondent, v. State of New York, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1964-10-21
Citations: 22 A.D.2d 722
Docket Number: Claim No. 39972; Claim No. 40099; Claim No. 42265
Parties: Arlen of Nanuet, Inc., et al., Appellants, v. State of New York, Respondent. Bernard S. Siegel et al., Respondents, v. State of New York, Respondent. Lake Nanuet Corporation, Respondent, v. State of New York, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 22
Pages: 722–722

Head Matter:
Arlen of Nanuet, Inc., et al., Appellants, v. State of New York, Respondent. Bernard S. Siegel et al., Respondents, v. State of New York, Respondent. Lake Nanuet Corporation, Respondent, v. State of New York, Respondent.
(Claim No. 39972.)
(Claim No. 40099.)
(Claim No. 42265.)

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We find no reason to disturb the exercise of discretion by the Court of Claims in directing joint trial of the claim of the fee owners and that of the tenants, arising out of appropriations for highway purposes; nor do we perceive any ground for appellants' apprehension that upon a joint trial the court will necessarily adopt the measure of damage which appellants consider to be eiToneous, and as to which we express no opinion. Order affirmed, with one bill of costs to respondents. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.