Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marlin RAINEY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-03-05
Citations: 368 F. App'x 417
Docket Number: No. 09-8049
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Marlin RAINEY, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 368
Pages: 417–417

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Marlin RAINEY, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 09-8049.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 25, 2010.
Decided: March 5, 2010.
Marlin Rainey, Appellant Pro Se. Irvin McCreary Allen, Office of the United States Attorney, Robert Eric Friedman, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Marlin Rainey appeals the district court's order denying his "Request for Nunc Pro Tunc and Amended Judgment." We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Rainey, No. 1:95-cr-00387-TSE-3 (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 21, 2009; entered Oct. 22, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.