Case Name: Bobby MURRAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-06-17
Citations: 602 So. 2d 583
Docket Number: No. 91-1450
Parties: Bobby MURRAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ANSTEAD and WARNER, JJ„ concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 602
Pages: 583–584

Head Matter:
Bobby MURRAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 91-1450.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
June 17, 1992.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Gary Caldwell, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Melynda Melear, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm appellant's conviction but reverse the sentence. On remand, the trial court shall make specific findings on the record pursuant to sections 775.084(1)(a) and 775.084(3)(d), Florida Statutes (1989), to support the habitual offender sentence. See Walker v. State, 462 So.2d 452 (Fla.1985) (failure to object in trial court to habitual offender sentence without statutory findings does not bar defendant from raising issue on direct appeal from sentence); King v. State, 580 So.2d 169 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) (en banc) (upon remand from defective habitual offender sentence, trial court is free to reimpose habitual offender sentence upon compliance with re quirement for statutory findings); Bryant v. State, 602 So.2d 682 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992) (same).
We also adopt the question certified in Van Bryant as one of great public importance.
CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.
ANSTEAD and WARNER, JJ" concur.
FARMER, J., specially concurs with opinion.