Case Name: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Louis GARZONE, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2010-10-14
Citations: 6 A.3d 500
Docket Number: 
Parties: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Louis GARZONE, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 6
Pages: 500–500

Head Matter:
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Louis GARZONE, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Oct. 14, 2010.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 14th day of October 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as phrased by Petitioner, is:
Did the Superior Court err in removing the cost of employing county detectives and assistant district attorneys from the trial court's discretion to impose prosecution expenses on a convicted offender?
This matter is to be consolidated with Commonwealth v. Gerald Garzone, — Pa. -, 6 A.3d 499 (2010).