Case Name: WORKMAN & SONS, INC., Respondent, v. RANDOLPH, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1989-05-17
Citations: 96 Or. App. 639
Docket Number: 65-688; CA A50094
Parties: WORKMAN & SONS, INC., Respondent, v. RANDOLPH, Appellant.
Judges: Before Graber, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 96
Pages: 639–640

Head Matter:
Submitted on record and briefs April 24,
affirmed; additional judgment awarded to respondent May 17, 1989
WORKMAN & SONS, INC., Respondent, v. RANDOLPH, Appellant.
(65-688; CA A50094)
773 P2d 26
Richard W. Todd, Beaverton, filed the brief for appellant.
Frederick S. Carman and Karpstein & Verhulst, P.C., Hillsboro, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Graber, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant appeals from a judgment for plaintiff in this action for money due on an account. None of his arguments has any merit, and we find that he had no probable cause for taking the appeal. Accordingly, we affirm and impose a ten percent penalty, pursuant to ORS 19.160. Broyles v. Brown, 295 Or 795, 671 P2d 94 (1983).
Affirmed; additional judgment of $696 awarded to respondent.