Case Name: MAYFLOWER INDUSTRIES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THOR CORPORATION, AN ILLINOIS CORPORATION, AND TELDISCO, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1952-06-16
Citations: 9 N.J. 605
Docket Number: 
Parties: MAYFLOWER INDUSTRIES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THOR CORPORATION, AN ILLINOIS CORPORATION, AND TELDISCO, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 9
Pages: 605–605

Head Matter:
MAYFLOWER INDUSTRIES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THOR CORPORATION, AN ILLINOIS CORPORATION, AND TELDISCO, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Argued June 9, 1952
Decided June 16, 1952.
Mr. Meyer E. Ruback argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Ruback, Albach & Weisman and Mr. Alfred C. Clapp, attorneys).
Mr. Thomas J. Brogan argued the cause for the respondent Thor Corporation.
Mr. Sol D. Kapelsohn argued the cause for the respondent Teldisco, Inc. (Messrs. Kapelsohn, Lerner, Leuchter & Reitman, attorneys).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The orders will be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinions of Judge Erancis in the court below.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Oliphant, Wachenpeld, Burling, Jacobs and Brennan —6.
For reversal — None.