Case Name: Louise M. NACHAND and William Mehler, Two of the Defendants Named in Pleadings Heretofore Filed in Behalf of Mrs. Bertha Pottinger and Others, in Behalf of Themselves and All Others Assessed in This Action, Appellants, v. A. M. ANDERSON, Receiver of National Bank of Kentucky, an Insolvent National Banking Association, Organized Under the Laws of the United States, Louisville, Kentucky, the Louisville Trust Company, Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1945-10-11
Citations: 151 F.2d 695
Docket Number: No. 10043
Parties: Louise M. NACHAND and William Mehler, Two of the Defendants Named in Pleadings Heretofore Filed in Behalf of Mrs. Bertha Pottinger and Others, in Behalf of Themselves and All Others Assessed in This Action, Appellants, v. A. M. ANDERSON, Receiver of National Bank of Kentucky, an Insolvent National Banking Association, Organized Under the Laws of the United States, Louisville, Kentucky, the Louisville Trust Company, Appellees.
Judges: Before HICKS, ALLEN and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 151
Pages: 695–695

Head Matter:
Louise M. NACHAND and William Mehler, Two of the Defendants Named in Pleadings Heretofore Filed in Behalf of Mrs. Bertha Pottinger and Others, in Behalf of Themselves and All Others Assessed in This Action, Appellants, v. A. M. ANDERSON, Receiver of National Bank of Kentucky, an Insolvent National Banking Association, Organized Under the Laws of the United States, Louisville, Kentucky, the Louisville Trust Company, Appellees.
No. 10043.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Oct. 11, 1945.
R. Ruthenburg, of Louisville, Ky., for appellants.
Nichols, Wood, Marx & Ginter, of Cincinnati, Ohio, and Alfred C. Krieger and Ogden, Galphin, Tarrant & Street, all of Louisville, Ky.,c for appellees.
Before HICKS, ALLEN and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This cause was heard on the transcript of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel, and it appearing that there is no reversible error upon the record, it is therefore ordered and adjudged that the order appealed from be and the same is in all things affirmed.