Case Name: Alexander Wasylenko, Plaintiff, v. Dimitri Frysky, Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1927-10-08
Citations: 130 Misc. 716
Docket Number: 
Parties: Alexander Wasylenko, Plaintiff, v. Dimitri Frysky, Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 130
Pages: 716–716

Head Matter:
Alexander Wasylenko, Plaintiff, v. Dimitri Frysky, Defendant.
Supreme Court, Westchester County,
October 8, 1927.
Wallace & Wallace, for the plaintiff.
David Qorfinkel, for the defendant.

Opinion:
Lynch, J.
This is a motion under rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice for judgment on the pleadings. The plaintiff has instituted an action to recover damages for slander.
An examination of the complaint discloses that the only alleged slanderous words charged against the defendant are that he informed the public officials that the plaintiff had violated the provisions of the National Prohibition Act (41 U. S. Stat. at Large, 305; U. S. Code, tit. 27). It is difficult to conceive how under any circumstances such words could be construed as slanderous. If it be true that the society in question illegally had liquor, it was the duty of the citizens to inform the government of that fact and thus prevent the violation of our laws. If the defendant gave this information, he was doing nothing more than what a good citizen should have done under like circumstances. The law certainly will not hold words slanderous if it charges the person with the performance of a lawful duty.
The defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings will be granted.