Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Vincent Bullock, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1999-12-28
Citations: 267 A.D.2d 175
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Vincent Bullock, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 267
Pages: 175–176

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Vincent Bullock, Appellant.
[700 NYS2d 675]

Opinion:
—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered February 21, 1995, convicting defendant, upon his pleas of guilty, of three counts of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to three concurrent terms of 7 to 14 years, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant's ineffective assistance claim is based on factual assertions dehors the record and thus would require a motion pursuant to CPL 440.10. To the extent defendant's claim can be reviewed on the instant record, we find that defendant received meaningful representation (see, People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404).
We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion. Concur — Tom, J. P., Wallach, Lerner, Saxe and Buckley, JJ.