Case Name: Harold R. LOVE, Appellant, v. Raymond L. SPRINGER, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1949-12-06
Citations: 179 F.2d 239
Docket Number: No. 10947
Parties: Harold R. LOVE, Appellant, v. Raymond L. SPRINGER, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 179
Pages: 239–240

Head Matter:
Harold R. LOVE, Appellant, v. Raymond L. SPRINGER, Appellee.
No. 10947.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
Dec. 6, 1949.
Harold R. Love, Minneapolis, Minn., pro se.
David C. Walls, John A. Fulton, Louisville, Ky., for appellee.
Before HICKS, Chief Judge, and SI-MONS and ALLEN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
It appearing that the conditions upon which we granted additional time to the ap pellant for perfecting his record on appeal have not been complied with and that no additional time has been requested within the period of permitted compliance,
It is ordered that the appeal be and it is hereby dismissed.