Case Name: THOMAS GRAVES, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. BURNS, LANE & RICHARDSON, RESPONDENT-APPELLANTTHOMAS GRAVES, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. BURNS, LANE & RICHARDSON, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1933-05-15
Citations: 110 N.J.L. 607
Docket Number: 
Parties: THOMAS GRAVES, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. BURNS, LANE & RICHARDSON, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 110
Pages: 607–607

Head Matter:
THOMAS GRAVES, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. BURNS, LANE & RICHARDSON, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Submitted February 17, 1933
Decided May 15, 1933.
For the defendant-appellant, Collins & Corbin (Edward A. Marlcley).
For the petitioner-respondent, Arthur C. Dunn.

Opinion:
Pee Curiam.
The evidence examined abundantly supports the findings of the Supreme Court. The judgment is therefore affirmed, for the reasons stated in the per curiam opinion of the Supreme Court reported supra.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Heher, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.