Case Name: Daniel Webster HILL, Plaintiff- Appellant, v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, Inc.; Tiffany Bennett; Tricia Baker, CMS/Rep, Defendants - Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-08-03
Citations: 329 F. App'x 391
Docket Number: No. 08-7670
Parties: Daniel Webster HILL, Plaintiff— Appellant, v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, Inc.; Tiffany Bennett; Tricia Baker, CMS/Rep, Defendants — Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 329
Pages: 391–392

Head Matter:
Daniel Webster HILL, Plaintiff— Appellant, v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, Inc.; Tiffany Bennett; Tricia Baker, CMS/Rep, Defendants — Appellees.
No. 08-7670.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 30, 2009.
Decided: Aug. 3, 2009.
Daniel Webster Hill, Appellant Pro Se. Philip Melton Andrews, Katrina J. Dennis, Kramon & Graham, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Daniel Webster Hill appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment to Defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) suit. On appeal, Hill asserts that the district court erred in denying his request for appointment of counsel, misled him into believing counsel had been appointed, and improperly scheduled the due date for his reply brief to the motion for summary judgment. Our review of the record reveals that the district court acted properly and did not abuse its wide discretion in such matters. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense .with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.