Case Name: Marco FRANKLIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2010-04-13
Citations: 308 S.W.3d 266
Docket Number: No. ED 92946
Parties: Marco FRANKLIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J. and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 308
Pages: 266–266

Head Matter:
Marco FRANKLIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 92946.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District. Division Three
April 13, 2010.
Lisa M. Stroup, Saint Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Karen L. Kramer, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J. and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Marco Franklin appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Franklin argues he was denied his right to effective assistance of counsel. The motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).