Case Name: LAURA LEIGH BOONE (STOTT) BROMHAL v. E. GREGORY STOTT
Court: North Carolina Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 1991-01-15
Citations: 101 N.C. App. 428
Docket Number: No. 9010DC572
Parties: LAURA LEIGH BOONE (STOTT) BROMHAL v. E. GREGORY STOTT
Judges: Judges ORR and GREENE concur.
Reporter: North Carolina Court of Appeals Reports
Volume: 101
Pages: 428–429

Head Matter:
LAURA LEIGH BOONE (STOTT) BROMHAL v. E. GREGORY STOTT
No. 9010DC572
(Filed 15 January 1991)
Appeal and Error § 105 (NCI4th)— domestic action — orders— interlocutory — appeal dismissed
An appeal was dismissed as interlocutory where defendant attempted to appeal from orders awarding plaintiff attorney’s fees on her motion to compel answers to interrogatories and requests for admission, denying defendant’s request for attorney’s fees on his motion to compel answers to interrogatories and requests for admission, and ruling by partial summary judgment that the parties’ separation agreement was valid but leaving the damages issue for later determination.
Am Jur 2d, Appeal and Error §§ 47, 50, 53, 135.
APPEAL by defendant from orders entered 4, 12, 17 January 1990 and 6 March 1990 by Judge Jerry W. Leonard in WAKE County District Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 5 December 1990.
Brady, SchilawsJci, Earls and Ingram, by Michael F. Schilawski, for plaintiff appellee.
Jack P. Gulley for defendant appellant.

Opinion:
PHILLIPS, Judge.
The parties were formerly wife and husband. Plaintiff's action seeks the specific enforcement of their separation agreement. Defendant's appeal is from orders that —
(a) awarded plaintiff attorney's fees on her motion to compel answers to her interrogatories and requests for admission;
(b) denied defendant's requests for attorney's fees on his motions to compel answers to his interrogatories and requests for admission;
(c) ruled by partial summary judgment that the parties' separation agreement is valid but left the damages issue for determination later.
The appeal is unauthorized and we dismiss it. All the orders are interlocutory; none will deprive defendant of a substantial right that would be lost if the orders are not reviewed before final judgment. G.S. 1-277; G.S. 7A-27; Waters v. Qualified Personnel, Inc., 294 N.C. 200, 240 S.E.2d 338 (1978).
Appeal dismissed.
Judges ORR and GREENE concur.