Case Name: KING INSTRUMENTS CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Luciano PEREGO and Tapematic, Defendant/Cross-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1995-07-10
Citations: 59 F.3d 163
Docket Number: Nos. 91-1125, 91-1132
Parties: KING INSTRUMENTS CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Luciano PEREGO and Tapematic, Defendant/Cross-Appellants.
Judges: Before ARCHER, Chief Judge, RICH, NIÉS, NEWMAN, MAYER, MICHEL, PLAGER, LOURIE, CLEVENGER, RADER, SCHALL, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 59
Pages: 163–163

Head Matter:
KING INSTRUMENTS CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Luciano PEREGO and Tapematic, Defendant/Cross-Appellants.
Nos. 91-1125, 91-1132.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
July 10, 1995.
David J. Brezner, Richard F. Trecartin and Richard P. Doyle, Jr., Flehr, Hohbach, Test, Albritton & Herbert, San Francisco, CA, were on the brief for plaintiff-appellant. Also on the brief was Nicholas A. Pandiscio, Schiller, Pandiscio & Kusmer, of Cambridge, MA, of counsel.
Edgar H. Haug, Adam L. Brookman and Mary Ann G. Mullen, Curtis, Morris & Safford, P.C., New York City, were on the brief for defendant/cross-appellants.
Before ARCHER, Chief Judge, RICH, NIÉS, NEWMAN, MAYER, MICHEL, PLAGER, LOURIE, CLEVENGER, RADER, SCHALL, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The appeals, having originally been submitted to a panel of the court and, thereafter, it having been ordered that the appeals should be decided en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the appeals shall be decided by the panel to which they were originally submitted.