Case Name: United New Jersey Railroad and Canal Company et al., appellants, v. William McCully et al., respondents
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1906-06-18
Citations: 69 N.J. Eq. 844
Docket Number: 
Parties: United New Jersey Railroad and Canal Company et al., appellants, v. William McCully et al., respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 69
Pages: 844–844

Head Matter:
United New Jersey Railroad and Canal Company et al., appellants, v. William McCully et al., respondents.
[Argued June 27th, 28th, 1905.
Decided June 18th, 1906.]
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by yice-Ohancellor Bergen, whose opinion is reported in 68 N. J. Eq. M2.
Mr. Alan II. Strong, for the appellants.
Mr. George T. Parrot, for the respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree in this case is affirmed for the reasons contained in the opinion delivered in the court of chancery by Vice-Chancellor Bergen.
For affirmance—Ti-ie Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Fort, Pitney, Swayze, Reed, Bogert, Vredeneurgii, yROOM^ Gray —10.
For reversal—None.