Case Name: Commonwealth ex rel. Fritchman, Appellant, v. Ceraul
Court: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1960-07-12
Citations: 193 Pa. Super. 7
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 25
Parties: Commonwealth ex rel. Fritchman, Appellant, v. Ceraul.
Judges: Before Rhodes, P. J., Gunther, Wright, Woodside, Ervin, Watkins, and Montgomery, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania Superior Court Reports
Volume: 193
Pages: 7–9

Head Matter:
Commonwealth ex rel. Fritchman, Appellant, v. Ceraul.
Submitted June 17, 1960.
Before Rhodes, P. J., Gunther, Wright, Woodside, Ervin, Watkins, and Montgomery, JJ.
July 12, 1960:
Raymond Fritehman, appellant, in propria persona.
Bernard V. O’Hare, Jr., First Assistant District Attorney, and Andrew L. Herster, Jr., District .Attorney, for appellee.

Opinion:
Opinion
Per Curiam,
The order of the court below dismissing relator's petition for writ of habeas corpus is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Woodring of the Court of Common Pleas of Northampton County, as reported in 21 Pa. D. & C. 2d 357, with a correction that the word "legality" be changed to "regularity," so that the sentence shall read: "A petition for writ of habeas corpus cannot be used to attach the sufficiency or regularity of proceedings prior to the grand jury's true bill (Com. ex rel. Scasserra v. Maroney, 179 Pa. Superior Ct. 150, 154, 115 A. 2d 912).3"