Case Name: C.M.D. & K.D.D, by their next friend, Sean C. DESMOND and Sean C. Desmond, Individually, Respondents, v. Wendy Dawn BLUMHORST, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2008-09-30
Citations: 265 S.W.3d 349
Docket Number: No. WD 68402
Parties: C.M.D. & K.D.D, by their next friend, Sean C. DESMOND and Sean C. Desmond, Individually, Respondents, v. Wendy Dawn BLUMHORST, Appellant.
Judges: Before JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Presiding Judge, and JOSEPH P. DANDURAND, Judge, and RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 265
Pages: 349–349

Head Matter:
C.M.D. & K.D.D, by their next friend, Sean C. DESMOND and Sean C. Desmond, Individually, Respondents, v. Wendy Dawn BLUMHORST, Appellant.
No. WD 68402.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Sept. 30, 2008.
James P. Barton, Jr., Marshall, MO, for appellant.
Sean C. Desmond, Lee’s Summit, MO, pro se, for respondent.
Before JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Presiding Judge, and JOSEPH P. DANDURAND, Judge, and RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Wendy Dawn Blumhorst (Mother) appeals the judgment in favor of Sean Desmond (Father) on the basis that it does not conform to the parties' agreement as to the splitting of child tax credits and abatement of child support during the summer. On appeal, Mother argues that the transcript reflects an agreement as to custody and visitation only. Having carefully considered Mother's contentions on appeal, we find no basis for reversing the decision of the trial court. A published formal opinion would have no precedential value, and the parties have been provided with a memorandum explaining the reasoning of the court. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).