Case Name: Mario BALLARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doctor WILLIAMS, DefendantAppellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-02-27
Citations: 56 F. App'x 193
Docket Number: No. 02-7924
Parties: Mario BALLARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doctor WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 56
Pages: 193–194

Head Matter:
Mario BALLARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doctor WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 02-7924.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 20, 2003.
Decided Feb. 27, 2003.
Mario Ballard, Appellant Pro Se.
Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Mario Ballard appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Ballard v. Williams, No. CA-02-830-7 (W.D.Va. July 18, 2002; Nov. 25, 2002). We deny Ballard's motion for hearing en banc and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.