Case Name: UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, Appellant, v. DIVERSIFIED WATER SYSTEMS CORPORATION and Virgil Lepar, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1984-12-26
Citations: 460 So. 2d 1013
Docket Number: No. 84-885
Parties: UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, Appellant, v. DIVERSIFIED WATER SYSTEMS CORPORATION and Virgil Lepar, Appellees.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 460
Pages: 1013–1013

Head Matter:
UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, Appellant, v. DIVERSIFIED WATER SYSTEMS CORPORATION and Virgil Lepar, Appellees.
No. 84-885.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 26, 1984.
Charles B. Atwood, III, and Theresa E. Dalba, Miami, for appellant.
Fowler, White, Burnett, Hurley, Banick & Strickroot and Michael J. Murphy and Michael Kennedy, Miami, for appellees.
Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the summary judgment entered in favor of the defendants Diversified Water Systems Corporation and Virgil Le-par upon a holding that the evidence before the trial court does not establish, as a matter of law, an accord and satisfaction. See Redding v. Powell, 452 So.2d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); see also Miller-Dunn Co. v. Green, 154 Fla. 72, 16 So.2d 637 (1944).
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.