Case Name: Mary A. Kunz, Respondent, v. The City of New York, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1914-11-10
Citations: 213 N.Y. 636
Docket Number: 
Parties: Mary A. Kunz, Respondent, v. The City of New York, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 213
Pages: 636–636

Head Matter:
Mary A. Kunz, Respondent, v. The City of New York, Appellant.
(Argued October 19, 1914;
decided November 10, 1914.)
Kunz v. City of N. Y., 155 App. Div. 920, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered March 5, 1913, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through the negligence of defendant in failing to keep a sidewalk in proper repair.
Frank L. Polk, Corporation Counsel (Edward A. Freshman and James D. Bell of counsel), for appellant.
Frederick E. Fishel and Hamilton Anderson for respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment .affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Werner, Chase, Collin, Hogan, Miller and Cardozo, JJ.