Case Name: The State, ex rel. Fant, Appellant, v. Arn, Supt., Ohio Reformatory for Women, Appellee
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1986-01-08
Citations: 21 Ohio St. 3d 53
Docket Number: No. 85-602
Parties: The State, ex rel. Fant, Appellant, v. Arn, Supt., Ohio Reformatory for Women, Appellee.
Judges: Celebrezze, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 21
Pages: 53–53

Head Matter:
The State, ex rel. Fant, Appellant, v. Arn, Supt., Ohio Reformatory for Women, Appellee.
[Cite as State, ex rel. Fant, v. Arn (1986), 21 Ohio St. 3d 53.]
(No. 85-602
Decided January 8, 1986.)
Henry J. Fant, pro se.
Anthony J. Celebrezze, Jr., attorney general, and Wendy Wonnell, for respondent.

Opinion:
The judgment of the court of appeals (case No. 14-84-28) dismissing relator's complaint in mandamus as moot is hereby affirmed on the authority of State, ex rel. Gantt, v. Coleman (1983), 6 Ohio St. 3d 5.
Celebrezze, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.