Case Name: James Rogers, Respondent v. James McGay, Impleaded, Appellant
Court: New York Superior Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1889-04-15
Citations: 24 Jones & S. 610
Docket Number: 
Parties: James Rogers, Respondent v. James McGay, Impleaded, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Reports of cases argued and determined in the Superior Court of the city of New York
Volume: 56
Pages: 610–610

Head Matter:
James Rogers, Respondent v. James McGay, Impleaded, Appellant.
Decided April 15, 1889.
Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff.
Hastings & Southworth, for appellant. James A. Deering, for respondent.
Before Sedgwick, Ch. J., Truax and Dugro, JJ.

Opinion:
This appeal involved only a question of fact. The Court held (Dugro, J., writing, Sedgwick, Ch. J., and Truax, J., concurring) " that the judgment should be affirmed."