Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Israel Lara AVILA, also known as Jorge Camacho Guiterrez, also known as Misael Lara-Avila, also known as Ismael Daniel Medina, also known as Juan Daniel Lara Avila, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-02-27
Citations: 713 F. App'x 366
Docket Number: No. 17-20196 Summary Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Israel Lara AVILA, also known as Jorge Camacho Guiterrez, also known as Misael Lara-Avila, also known as Ismael Daniel Medina, also known as Juan Daniel Lara Avila, Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 713
Pages: 366–366

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Israel Lara AVILA, also known as Jorge Camacho Guiterrez, also known as Misael Lara-Avila, also known as Ismael Daniel Medina, also known as Juan Daniel Lara Avila, Defendant-Appellant
No. 17-20196 Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed February 27, 2018
Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Israel Lara Avila, Pro Se
Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Israel Lara Avila has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Avila has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Avila's response. We agree with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cíe. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.