Case Name: William WEINTRAUB, Appellant, v. Janet WEINTRAUB, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-05-03
Citations: 756 So. 2d 1092
Docket Number: No. 3D98-2214
Parties: William WEINTRAUB, Appellant, v. Janet WEINTRAUB, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and GREEN, JJ. -
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 756
Pages: 1092–1092

Head Matter:
William WEINTRAUB, Appellant, v. Janet WEINTRAUB, Appellee.
No. 3D98-2214.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 3, 2000.
Abrams, Etter & Marks, P.A., and Brenda Abrams, Miami, for appellant.
James M. Schiff, Miami; Langbein & Langbein, P.A., and Evan J. Langbein, Aventura, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and GREEN, JJ. -

Opinion:
On Motion for Rehearing Denied
COPE, J.
By motion for rehearing, the father argues that we have misapprehended Roshkind v. Roshkind, 717 So.2d 545 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), and asks that we take judicial notice of the Fourth District Court of Appeal record in that case. We decline to do so. See Hillsborough County Board of County Commissioners v. Public Employees Relations Commission, 424 So.2d 132, 134 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). We rely on the face of the Roshkind opinion as written.
Rehearing denied.