Case Name: RE: AMENDMENT TO RULE 410, SOUTH CAROLINA APPELLATE COURT RULES
Court: Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jurisdiction: South Carolina
Decision Date: 2017-03-30
Citations: 419 S.C. 411
Docket Number: Appellate Case No. 2017-000219
Parties: RE: AMENDMENT TO RULE 410, SOUTH CAROLINA APPELLATE COURT RULES
Judges: 
Reporter: South Carolina Reports
Volume: 419
Pages: 411–412

Head Matter:
798 S.E.2d 444
RE: AMENDMENT TO RULE 410, SOUTH CAROLINA APPELLATE COURT RULES
Appellate Case No. 2017-000219
Supreme Court of South Carolina.
March 30, 2017

Opinion:
ORDER
The South Carolina Bar has filed a petition to amend Rule 410, SCACR, to reclassify certain federal administrative law judges as Administrative Law Judge Members by eliminating the requirement that those judges primarily perform their duties within the State of South Carolina. We grant the Bar's request to amend Rule 410(h)(1)(F), SCACR, to provide as follows:
(F) Administrative Law Judge or Workers' Compensation Commission Member. This class shall include any member who is a judge on the South Carolina Administrative Law Court, is a federal administrative law judge or is a South Carolina Workers' Compensation Commissioner.
The amendment is effective immediately; however, members reclassified by this amendment are not entitled to any refund of license fees for License Year 2017.
/s/Donald W. Beatty, C.J.
/s/John W. Kittredge, J.
/s/Kaye G. Hearn, J.
/s/John Cannon Few, J.
/s/George C. James, Jr" J.