Case Name: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v. Benjamin and Julia F. MAHLER, Respondents
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1956-01-03
Citations: 228 F.2d 903
Docket Number: No. 9, Docket 23480
Parties: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v. Benjamin and Julia F. MAHLER, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 228
Pages: 903–904

Head Matter:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v. Benjamin and Julia F. MAHLER, Respondents.
No. 9, Docket 23480.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued Dec. 14, 1955.
Decided Jan. 3, 1956.
H. Brian Holland, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ellis N. Slack, Hilbert P. Zarky and George F. Lynch, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., for petitioner.
Benjamin Mahler, New York City, for respondents.
Robert Ash, Washington, D. C., as amicus curiae.
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and MEDINA and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We agree with and shall follow the decisions made on the precise point at issue here by our brethren of the Third, Fourth and Ninth Circuits. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Stockly, 3 Cir., 221 F.2d 745, affirming Stockly v. Commissioner, 22 T.C. 28; Hofferbert v. Marshall, 4 Cir., 200 F.2d 648, affirming Marshall v. Hofferbert, D.C.Md., 108 F.Supp. 350; Ford v. Commissioner, 9 Cir., 217 F.2d 886, adopting the reasoning expressed in the opinion of Judge (now Chief Judge) Murdock in the Stockly case, supra, after review by the entire Tax Court.
Affirmed.