Case Name: FONG POY et al., Petitioners, v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1941-12-08
Citations: 124 F.2d 398
Docket Number: No. 9865
Parties: FONG POY et al., Petitioners, v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Respondent.
Judges: Before GARRECHT, HANEY, and STEPHENS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 124
Pages: 398–398

Head Matter:
FONG POY et al., Petitioners, v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Respondent.
No. 9865.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Dec. 8, 1941.
Elliott Johnson, of Oakland, Cal., for petitioners.
W. T. Kelley, Chief Counsel, Federal Trade Commission, of Washington, D. C., for respondent.
Before GARRECHT, HANEY, and STEPHENS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The default of petitioners in depositing the estimated expense of printing the transcript of record herein having been noted, and petitioners having indicated by letter that the petition to review herein has been abandoned, it is ordered, pursuant to provisions of 15 U.S.C.A. § 45(c), that a decree' of this Court be filed and entered herein affirming the order of the Federal Trade Commission, and commanding obedience to the terms of such order of said Commission.