Case Name: Robert LAUTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-06-22
Citations: 691 F. App'x 789
Docket Number: No. 17-1304
Parties: Robert LAUTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 691
Pages: 789–789

Head Matter:
Robert LAUTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 17-1304
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 20, 2017
Decided: June 22, 2017
Robert Lauter, Appellant Pro Se.
Richard J. Cromwell, MCGUIRE-WOODS, LLP, Norfolk, Virginia, for Ap-pellee.
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Robert Lauter appeals the district court's order dismissing his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lauter v. GlaxoSmithKline, No. 2:16-cv-00716-AWA-RJK (E.D. Va. Mar. 3, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED