Case Name: Constance Jeanne SAMMARCO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PRINCE GEORGE PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-02-11
Citations: 556 F. App'x 200
Docket Number: No. 13-2202
Parties: Constance Jeanne SAMMARCO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PRINCE GEORGE PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 556
Pages: 200–200

Head Matter:
Constance Jeanne SAMMARCO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PRINCE GEORGE PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 13-2202.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 28, 2014.
Decided: Feb. 11, 2014.
Constance Jeanne Sammarco, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Judah Baror, Linda Hitt Thatcher, THATCHER LAW FIRM, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are. not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Constance Jeanne Sammarco appeals the district court's order dismissing for failure to state a claim her complaint asserting violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. § 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2006 & Supp.2013), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 621 to 634 (2012). Sammarco asserted claims that her employer subjected her to disparate treatment based on her race and age, a hostile work environment, and retaliation for protected activities. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. Sammarco v. Prince George Pub. Sch., No. l:13-cv-01079-CCB, 2013 WL 5274277 (D.Md. Sept. 16, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.