Case Name: State of New Hampshire v. Ralph Crossen
Court: New Hampshire Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Hampshire
Decision Date: 1975-03-31
Citations: 115 N.H. 137
Docket Number: No. 6984
Parties: State of New Hampshire v. Ralph Crossen
Judges: 
Reporter: New Hampshire Reports
Volume: 115
Pages: 137–138

Head Matter:
Hillsborough
No. 6984
State of New Hampshire v. Ralph Crossen
March 31, 1975
Warren B. Rudman, attorney general, and Edward N. Damon, attorney, by brief for the State.
Ralph Crossen, pro se, by brief.

Opinion:
Memorandum Opinion
Defendant was convicted in a jury trial in which he was represented by counsel of two counts of selling a controlled drug. Defendant's exceptions were reserved and transferred by Cann, J-
A review of the transcript does not support the claim of the defendant that he did not receive a fair trial. The claim that newly discovered evidence warrants a new trial should be addressed to the superior court. RSA 491:7 (Supp. 1973); State v. Long, 90 N.H. 103, 107, 4 A.2d 865, 868 (1939).
Exceptions overruled.