Case Name: Hiram E. Budd et al., complainants and appellants, v. The Camden Horse Railroad Company et al., defendants and respondents
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1902-06-23
Citations: 63 N.J. Eq. 804
Docket Number: 
Parties: Hiram E. Budd et al., complainants and appellants, v. The Camden Horse Railroad Company et al., defendants and respondents.
Judges: For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Collins, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Bogert, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees, Vroom—14.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 63
Pages: 804–805

Head Matter:
Hiram E. Budd et al., complainants and appellants, v. The Camden Horse Railroad Company et al., defendants and respondents.
[Filed June 23d, 1902.]
Mr. Francis D. Weaver, for the appellants.
Mr. Edward Ambler Armstrong, for the'respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated by Vice-Chancellor Grey in the opinion filed in the court below. See 16 Dick. Ch. Rep. 543.
For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Collins, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Bogert, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees, Vroom—14.
For reversal—None.