Case Name: Angela HARPER; et al., Plaintiffs, Angela Harper, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO HOLDINGS INC.; Pelican Cigar Co.; Wal-Mart Stores Inc.; R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.; Schlesingers Wholesalers & Automotive Cigarette Service Inc.; Wal-Mart Louisiana LLC, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-07-17
Citations: 190 F. App'x 395
Docket Number: No. 05-30657
Parties: Angela HARPER; et al., Plaintiffs, Angela Harper, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO HOLDINGS INC.; Pelican Cigar Co.; Wal-Mart Stores Inc.; R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.; Schlesingers Wholesalers & Automotive Cigarette Service Inc.; Wal-Mart Louisiana LLC, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before JOLLY, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 190
Pages: 395–396

Head Matter:
Angela HARPER; et al., Plaintiffs, Angela Harper, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO HOLDINGS INC.; Pelican Cigar Co.; Wal-Mart Stores Inc.; R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.; Schlesingers Wholesalers & Automotive Cigarette Service Inc.; Wal-Mart Louisiana LLC, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 05-30657.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Decided July 17, 2006.
Jennifer Ann Jones, Jones Law Firm, Cameron, LA, Kenneth E. Badon, The Ba-don Law Firm, Clayton Arthur Larsh Davis, James D. Cain, Lundy & Davis, Lake Charles, LA, for Plaintiffs and Plaintiff-Appellant.
Dennis Leo Murphy, Jones Day, Cleveland, OH, James R. Nieset, Plauche, Smith & Nieset, Lake Charles, LA, Sean Patrick Costello, Jones Day, Atlanta, GA, David Alexander Young, Office of the Attorney General for the State of Louisiana, Baton Rouge, LA, John E. McElligott, Jr., Davidson, Meaux, Sonnier & McElligott, Lafayette, LA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before JOLLY, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
AFFIRMED. See 5th Cir R. 47.6.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.