Case Name: James D. BALDWIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-08-28
Citations: 374 S.W.3d 397
Docket Number: No. WD 74009
Parties: James D. BALDWIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Division Two: JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Presiding Judge, ALOK AHUJA, Judge and MARK D. PFEIFFER, Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 374
Pages: 397–398

Head Matter:
James D. BALDWIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 74009.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Aug. 28, 2012.
Susan E. Summers, for Appellant.
Richard A. Starnes, for Respondent.
Before Division Two: JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Presiding Judge, ALOK AHUJA, Judge and MARK D. PFEIFFER, Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Appellant James D. Baldwin appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evi-dentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. A formal, published opinion would have no jurisprudential value; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).