Case Name: Michael B. WOOLMAN, Appellant, v. State of NEBRASKA; Jon Bruning, Attorney General for Nebraska, Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-05-03
Citations: 469 F. App'x 484
Docket Number: No. 12-1139
Parties: Michael B. WOOLMAN, Appellant, v. State of NEBRASKA; Jon Bruning, Attorney General for Nebraska, Appellees.
Judges: Before BYE, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 469
Pages: 484–484

Head Matter:
Michael B. WOOLMAN, Appellant, v. State of NEBRASKA; Jon Bruning, Attorney General for Nebraska, Appellees.
No. 12-1139.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: April 30, 2012.
Filed: May 3, 2012.
Michael B. Woolman, Lincoln, NE, prose.
Before BYE, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Michael Woolman appeals the district court's preservice dismissal of his complaint without prejudice. Upon careful de novo review, we find no basis for reversal. See Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir.2000) (per curiam) (standard of review); see also Stone v. Harry, 364 F.3d 912, 914 (8th Cir.2004) (while pro se complaint should be liberally construed, it still must allege facts to support claims advanced; court will not supply facts or construct legal theory for plaintiff).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cm. R. 47B. We also deny Woolman's pending motion to compel discovery.
. The Honorable Laurie Smith Camp, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.