Case Name: JIMMIE FRATERRIGO v. ATHA MAE FRATERRIGO
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1944-06-27
Citations: 154 Fla. 652
Docket Number: 
Parties: JIMMIE FRATERRIGO v. ATHA MAE FRATERRIGO
Judges: BUFORD, C. J., CHAPMAN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 154
Pages: 652–653

Head Matter:
JIMMIE FRATERRIGO v. ATHA MAE FRATERRIGO
18 So. (2nd) 539
June Term, 1944
June 27, 1944
Division A
Albert D’Ar^a, for appellant.
Minardi & Lucarelli, for appellee.

Opinion:
TERRELL, J.:
This appeal is from a final decree granting a divorce restoring complainant's maiden name and declaring her to be the owner of a certain business known as the Roxy Bar. It is contended that the final decree was void because the service was defective and jurisdiction over the defendant was never acquired.
The record has. been examined "and since the question of jurisdiction was not raised until after final decree, we think State ex rel. Lorenz v. Lorenz, 149 Fla. 625, 6 So. (2nd) 620; Walker v. Carver, 93 Fla. 337, 112 So. 45; and State ex rel. Gore v. Chillingworth, 126 Fla. 645, 171 So. 649, conclude the case contrary to appellant's contention.
Affirmed.
BUFORD, C. J., CHAPMAN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.