Case Name: STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Daniel Wyne RHAMY, Defendant-Appellant.
Court: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2018-11-07
Citations: 431 P.3d 103
Docket Number: A165295; A165294 (Control)
Parties: STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Daniel Wyne RHAMY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and DeVore, Judge, and James, Judge.
Reporter: Pacific Reporter 3d
Volume: 431
Pages: 103–103

Head Matter:
STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Daniel Wyne RHAMY, Defendant-Appellant.
A165295
A165294 (Control)
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Submitted September 7, 2018.
November 7, 2018
Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Erik Blumenthal, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.
Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Peenesh Shah, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and DeVore, Judge, and James, Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant challenges a probation condition, imposed in each of these consolidated cases, that prohibits him from applying for or using a registry identification card pursuant to the Oregon Medical Marijuana Act (OMMA). He argues that, under ORS 137.542(2), the conditions of supervision for an OMMA registry cardholder "must be imposed in the same manner as the conditions of supervision of a person sentenced to probation related to prescription drugs," and that the court's unqualified prohibition on his participation in the OMMA-in the absence of any findings to justify that special condition-violates that statute. The state concedes that the trial court erred in imposing the condition and that, because it appeared for the first time in the judgments, ordinary preservation requirements are excused. We agree with the state in both respects, and we remand each case for resentencing.
Remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.