Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John Nettingham, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1962-11-19
Citations: 17 A.D.2d 979
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John Nettingham, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 17
Pages: 979–979

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John Nettingham, Appellant.

Opinion:
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County, rendered April 22,1960 after a jury trial, convicting him of (a) possession of a narcotic with intent to sell; and (b) sale of a narcotic (Penal Law, § 1751, subds. 1, 2), and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. In the absence of objection on constitutional grounds, or inquiry indicating that the lawfulness of the alleged search and seizure is questioned, the defendant, on an appeal, may not take advantage of the determination in Mapp v. Ohio (367 U. S. 643). (See People v. Loria, 10 N Y 2d 368; People v. Friola, 11 N Y 2d 157; People v. O'Neill, 11 N Y 2d 148.) Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.