Case Name: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Gregory G. GEISS, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2012-04-12
Citations: 88 So. 3d 111
Docket Number: No. SC11-1512
Parties: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Gregory G. GEISS, Respondent.
Judges: CANADY, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 88
Pages: 111–112

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Gregory G. GEISS, Respondent.
No. SC11-1512.
Supreme Court of Florida.
April 12, 2012.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, FL, and Kristen L. Davenport and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorneys General, Daytona Beach, FL, for Petitioner.
Angela Meriah Park and Ernest L. Chang, Melbourne, FL, for Respondent.
James T. Miller, Jacksonville, FL, Sonya Rudenstine, Gainesville, FL, and Michael Ufferman, Tallahassee, FL, on behalf of Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (FACDL), as Amicus Curiae.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the Fifth District Court of Appeal in State v. Geiss, 70 So.3d 642, 652 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011), in which the district court passed upon a question certified by it to be of great public importance. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. After further consideration, we have determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, we dismiss this review proceeding.
It is so ordered.
CANADY, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.