Case Name: William Columbus SMITH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patricia R. STANSBERRY, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-04-20
Citations: 126 F. App'x 137
Docket Number: No. 04-7906
Parties: William Columbus SMITH, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Patricia R. STANSBERRY, Warden, Respondent—Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 126
Pages: 137–137

Head Matter:
William Columbus SMITH, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Patricia R. STANSBERRY, Warden, Respondent—Appellee.
No. 04-7906.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 14, 2005.
Decided April 20, 2005.
William Columbus Smith, Appellant pro se.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
William C. Smith appeals the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Smith v. Stansberry, No. CA-04-557-5-FL (E.D.N.C. Oct. 28, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED