Case Name: JACOB ROSENTHAL, RESPONDENT, v. JOSEPH ENGEL, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1930-02-03
Citations: 106 N.J.L. 251
Docket Number: 
Parties: JACOB ROSENTHAL, RESPONDENT, v. JOSEPH ENGEL, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 106
Pages: 251–251

Head Matter:
JACOB ROSENTHAL, RESPONDENT, v. JOSEPH ENGEL, APPELLANT.
Submitted May 31, 1929
Decided February 3, 1930.
Por the respondent, David, L. Litwin.
For the appellant, Cohen & Klein.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Black, Campbell, Case, Bodine, Van Buskirk, McC-lennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.