Case Name: CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY CO., Plaintiff in Error, v. Katherine LINSTEAD, Executrix, Defendant in Error
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1926-11-09
Citations: 14 F.2d 1021
Docket Number: No. 4626
Parties: CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY CO., Plaintiff in Error, v. Katherine LINSTEAD, Executrix, Defendant in Error.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 14
Pages: 1021–1021

Head Matter:
CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY CO., Plaintiff in Error, v. Katherine LINSTEAD, Executrix, Defendant in Error.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
November 9, 1926.)
No. 4626.
Frank M. Tracy, of Cincinnati, Ohio (Galvin & Tracy, of Cincinnati, Ohio, on the brief), for plaintiff in error.
John W. Cowell, of Cincinnati, Ohio (Ratterman & Cowell, of Cincinnati, Ohio, on the brief), for defendant in error.
Before DENISON, DONAHUE, and MOORMAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We are unable effectively to distinguish the facts of this ease from those of Hull v. Philadelphia, etc., Ry., 252 U. S. 475, 40 S. Ct. 358, 64 L. Ed. 670, an opinion which apparently was not brought to the attention of the trial court. It thus becomes necessary to reverse the judgment and remand for further proceedings. We express no opinion as to whether an amendment pursuant to the rule of the Kinney Case, 260 U. S. 340, 43 S. Ct. 122, 67 L. Ed. 294, can be allowed in the trial court, if now desired.