Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Malcolm Reid McDONALD, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-04-29
Citations: 324 F. App'x 667
Docket Number: No. 08-30323
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Malcolm Reid McDONALD, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: GRABER, GOULD, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 324
Pages: 667–668

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Malcolm Reid McDONALD, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-30323.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 13, 2009.
Filed April 29, 2009.
Elizabeth A. Horsman, Esquire, Office of the U.S. Attorneys, Helena,- MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Evangelo Arvanetes, Assistant Federal Public Defender, FDMT — Federal Defend ers of Montana, Great Falls, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: GRABER, GOULD, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Malcolm Reid McDonald appeals from the 33-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for misuse of a social security number, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 408(a)(7)(B), and aggravated identity theft, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028A(a)(l). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
McDonald contends that his sentence is unreasonable because the district court failed to consider the sentencing factors listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) and because the sentence is greater than necessary. We conclude that the district court did not commit procedural error, and that the sentence is substantively reasonable. See United States v. Stoterau, 524 F.3d 988, 999-1002 (9th Cir.2008).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.