Case Name: The NATIONAL BENEVOLENT Association Of The Christian Church (Disciples Of Christ), Reorganized Debtors d/b/a Disciples Benevolent Services and State of Missouri, ex rel. Chris Koster, Attorney General of Missouri, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-04-17
Citations: 370 S.W.3d 889
Docket Number: No. ED 96951
Parties: The NATIONAL BENEVOLENT Association Of The Christian Church (Disciples Of Christ), Reorganized Debtors d/b/a Disciples Benevolent Services and State of Missouri, ex rel. Chris Koster, Attorney General of Missouri, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 370
Pages: 889–889

Head Matter:
The NATIONAL BENEVOLENT Association Of The Christian Church (Disciples Of Christ), Reorganized Debtors d/b/a Disciples Benevolent Services and State of Missouri, ex rel. Chris Koster, Attorney General of Missouri, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP, Defendant/Respondent.
No. ED 96951.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
April 17, 2012.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 29, 2012.
Application for Transfer Denied Aug. 14, 2012.
Gray, Ritter & Graham, P.C., Don M. Downing, Patrick J. Hagerty, Kaitlin A., Chris Roster, Attorney General, Robert E. Carlson, Assistant Attorney General, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Armstrong Teasdale LLP, Harold L. Lowenstein, Richard B. Scherrer, Steven N. Cousins, Lisa M. Wood, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The National Benevolent Association of the Christian Church, Reorganized Debtors d/b/a Disciples Benevolent Services and State of Missouri, ex rel. Chris Roster, Attorney General of Missouri (collectively Plaintiffs) appeal from the grant of summary judgment in favor of Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP on Plaintiffs' claim for legal malpractice. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value or serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).