Case Name: Kelvin L. MURRAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1980-04-02
Citations: 382 So. 2d 765
Docket Number: No. 79-1839
Parties: Kelvin L. MURRAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SCHEB, Acting C. J., and OTT and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 382
Pages: 765–765

Head Matter:
Kelvin L. MURRAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 79-1839.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
April 2, 1980.
Jack 0. Johnson, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.,
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Michael J. Kotler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Section 39.111(6)(d), Florida Statutes (1979), requires that a trial court, when imposing adult sanctions on a juvenile convicted of a crime, make findings of fact and set forth reasons showing those sanctions to be in conformity with the criteria of Section 39.111(6)(c). The record here reveals that the trial judge failed to refer to all of the six criteria mentioned in that section when he sentenced appellant.
We affirm, the judgment of the trial court, but vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing pursuant to Section 39.-111(6). See Proctor v. State, 373 So.2d 450 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979); Johnson v. State, 371 So.2d 556 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).
SCHEB, Acting C. J., and OTT and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.