Case Name: DADELAND FAMILY PLANNING CENTER, INC., Appellant, v. Cynthia D. CASH, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1987-12-08
Citations: 516 So. 2d 84
Docket Number: No. 87-1495
Parties: DADELAND FAMILY PLANNING CENTER, INC., Appellant, v. Cynthia D. CASH, Appellee.
Judges: Before HENDRY, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 516
Pages: 84–84

Head Matter:
DADELAND FAMILY PLANNING CENTER, INC., Appellant, v. Cynthia D. CASH, Appellee.
No. 87-1495.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 8, 1987.
Hoppe & Backmeyer and Terry S. Nelson, Miami, for appellant.
Robert M. Hustead, Homestead, for ap-pellee.
Before HENDRY, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court's determination that appellant failed to demonstrate excusable neglect, see Orlando Partners, Ltd. v. Classic Tour Lines, 492 So.2d 1117 (Fla. 3d DCA), review dismissed, 497 So.2d 1217 (Fla.1986); Bayview Tower Condominium Ass'n, Inc. v. Schweizer, 475 So.2d 982 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), and was therefore not entitled to vacation of the default. The second amended complaint, although not artfully pled, is not fundamentally flawed, Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.120(c), and contains sufficient allegations against appellant to support the trial court's denial. Appellant's remaining point lacks merit.
Affirmed.