Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven KINNEY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-12-17
Citations: 358 F. App'x 995
Docket Number: No. 08-10306
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven KINNEY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 358
Pages: 995–996

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven KINNEY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-10306.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 17, 2009.
Filed Dec. 17, 2009.
Nancy J. Koppe, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Robert Lawrence Ellman, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Camille W. Damm, Assistant U.S., Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Nancy J. Koppe, Esquire, Camille W. Damm, Robert Lawrence Ellman, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Steven Kinney, for Defendant-Appellant.
Steven Kinney, Safford, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Steven Kinney appeals pro se from the district court's May 29, 2008, order denying his requests for documents and to unseal a portion of the record. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion when it denied Kinney's post-judgment motions.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.