Case Name: Dwight Lorell TROUTMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2001-02-07
Citations: 779 So. 2d 574
Docket Number: No. 2D99-5019
Parties: Dwight Lorell TROUTMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: PARKER, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL, MONTEREY, (Senior) Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 779
Pages: 574–574

Head Matter:
Dwight Lorell TROUTMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D99-5019.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Feb. 7, 2001.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and William L. Sharwell, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sonya Roebuck Hor-belt, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

Opinion:
SALCINES, Judge.
Dwight Lorrell Troutman appeals his convictions for sale or delivery and possession of cocaine. We affirm without comment except to note that one issue he raised involved the sufficiency of the Far-etta inquiry regarding the warnings of the disadvantages and dangers of self-representation. Although we find the inquiry sufficient in the present case, we commend, to trial judges, the comments to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.111 which provide an excellent colloquy which can be followed when a Faretta inquiry is implicated.
Affirmed.
PARKER, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL, MONTEREY, (Senior) Judge, concur.
. Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975).