Case Name: Juan R. DURRUTHY; Juana Durruthy, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MTC FINANCIAL, INC., DBA Trustee Corps; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-12-26
Citations: 708 F. App'x 392
Docket Number: No. 17-55512
Parties: Juan R. DURRUTHY; Juana Durruthy, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MTC FINANCIAL, INC., DBA Trustee Corps; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 708
Pages: 392–392

Head Matter:
Juan R. DURRUTHY; Juana Durruthy, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MTC FINANCIAL, INC., DBA Trustee Corps; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 17-55512
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted December 18, 2017
Filed December 26, 2017
Juan R. Durruthy, Pro Se
Juana Durruthy, Pro Se
Jan T. Chilton, Attorney, Severson & Werson APC, San Francisco, CA, Kerry W. Franich, Severson & Werson, Irvine, CA, for Defendants-Appellees
Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Juan R. Durruthy and Juana Durruthy appeal pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing their action alleging federal claims for failure to pay the filing fee after denying their motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
Because the Durruthys have failed to address on appeal how the district court erred in dismissing their action, they have waived their challenge to the district court's dismissal for failure to pay the filing fee. See Smith v. Marsh, 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999) ("[0]n appeal, arguments not raised by a party in its opening brief are deemed waived.").
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.