Case Name: David WALLS, Respondent, v. J. Russell JONES, Jr., d/b/a Mirage Motor Co., Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-03-28
Citations: 14 S.W.3d 674
Docket Number: No. ED 76128
Parties: David WALLS, Respondent, v. J. Russell JONES, Jr., d/b/a Mirage Motor Co., Appellant.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., and ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 14
Pages: 674–674

Head Matter:
David WALLS, Respondent, v. J. Russell JONES, Jr., d/b/a Mirage Motor Co., Appellant.
No. ED 76128.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
March 28, 2000.
Elaine A. Pudlowski, St. Louis, for appellant.
David J. Rauscher, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., and ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
J. Russell Jones, Jr., d/b/a Mirage Motor Co. (Jones) appeals the trial court's order overruling his motion to set aside the judgment entered in favor of David Walls (Walls). Jones argues the trial court erred in overruling his motion to set aside the judgment because he satisfied the requirements under Rules 74.03 and 74.06.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).