Case Name: Rodney Victor HARRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Angi Nicole MORRIS, Attorney At Law; Gilmer, Sadler, Ingram, Sutherland & Hutton, L.L.P., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-05-11
Citations: 96 F. App'x 883
Docket Number: No. 03-2500
Parties: Rodney Victor HARRIS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Angi Nicole MORRIS, Attorney At Law; Gilmer, Sadler, Ingram, Sutherland & Hutton, L.L.P., Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 96
Pages: 883–883

Head Matter:
Rodney Victor HARRIS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Angi Nicole MORRIS, Attorney At Law; Gilmer, Sadler, Ingram, Sutherland & Hutton, L.L.P., Defendants—Appellees.
No. 03-2500.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 23, 2004.
Decided May 11, 2004.
Rodney Victor Harris, Appellant pro se. Jim Harold Guynn, Jr., Guynn, Memmer & Dillon, P.C., Roanoke, Virginia; Phillip Verne Anderson, Kevin Osborne Barnard, Frith, Anderson & Peake, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Rodney Victor Harris appeals the district court's order dismissing his complaint alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) and state law. We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny Harris's motions for a stay, to supplement the record with circuit court transcripts, and for a continuance, and we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Harris v. Morris, No. CA-03-560-7 (W.D.Va. Nov. 14, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED