Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Vincent RUTHERFORD, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-01-21
Citations: 362 F. App'x 373
Docket Number: No. 09-6966
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Vincent RUTHERFORD, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 362
Pages: 373–374

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Vincent RUTHERFORD, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 09-6966.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 17, 2009.
Decided: Jan. 21, 2010.
Vincent Rutherford, Appellant Pro Se. C. Nicks Williams, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Vincent Rutherford appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduc tion of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Rutherford, No. 1:02-cr-00049-GCM-1 (W.D.N.C. May 21, 2009). We deny Rutherford's motion to strike sentencing enhancement and request for evidentiary hearing and incorporated memorandum of law, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.