Case Name: James RIFFIN, Debtor-Appellant, v. Mark Jerome FRIEDMAN, Trustee-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-09-13
Citations: 446 F. App'x 614
Docket Number: No. 11-1172
Parties: James RIFFIN, Debtor-Appellant, v. Mark Jerome FRIEDMAN, Trustee-Appellee.
Judges: Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 446
Pages: 614–615

Head Matter:
James RIFFIN, Debtor-Appellant, v. Mark Jerome FRIEDMAN, Trustee-Appellee.
No. 11-1172.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 31, 2011.
Decided: Sept. 13, 2011.
James Riffin, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Jerome Friedman, DLA Piper U.S. LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James Riffin appeals the district court's order affirming the bankruptcy court's order granting the Trustee's motion for approval of a settlement agreement, to cooperate to obtain access to a letter of credit, and to modify, as necessary, the automatic stay, 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Riffin v. Friedman, Nos. 1:10-cv-02618-CCB; 10-11248-DK (D.Md. Feb. 7, 2011). We dis pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.