Case Name: Amy HABIE, Petitioner, v. Joseph HABIE, a/k/a Jose Habie, a/k/a Joey Habie, a/k/a Jose Habie Nigrin, Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-11-25
Citations: 614 So. 2d 1116
Docket Number: No. 92-2608
Parties: Amy HABIE, Petitioner, v. Joseph HABIE, a/k/a Jose Habie, a/k/a Joey Habie, a/k/a Jose Habie Nigrin, Respondent.
Judges: ANSTEAD and HERSEY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 614
Pages: 1116–1116

Head Matter:
Amy HABIE, Petitioner, v. Joseph HABIE, a/k/a Jose Habie, a/k/a Joey Habie, a/k/a Jose Habie Nigrin, Respondent.
No. 92-2608.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Nov. 25, 1992.
A. Matthew Miller of Miller, Schwartz & Miller, P.A., and Litman, Muchnick, Was-serman & Hartman, Hollywood, for petitioner.
Leon R. Margules of Entin, Schwartz & Margules, P.A., Miami, for respondent.

Opinion:
GUNTHER, Judge.
Although we deny the petition for writ of certiorari on the grounds of mootness, we note the peculiar circumstances of this case and acknowledge that they may form the basis of proper issues on plenary appeal. In particular, the guardian ad litem's ex parte application to the trial court for appointment of his own brother, a psychologist residing in Pennsylvania, to assist in evaluating the living situation of the children located in Guatemala, and the petitioner's contention that the ex parte application was made after the guardian and his brother had completed their evaluation of the children, if true, are questionable events which may give rise to reversible error.
DENIED.
ANSTEAD and HERSEY, JJ., concur.