Case Name: Freddy CURIEL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Amy MILLER, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-08-25
Citations: 798 F.3d 1209
Docket Number: No. 11-56949
Parties: Freddy CURIEL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Amy MILLER, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 798
Pages: 1209–1210

Head Matter:
Freddy CURIEL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Amy MILLER, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 11-56949.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Aug. 25, 2015.
Jan Burns Norman, Attorney at Law, Davis, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.
Freddy Curiel, pro se.
Kyle Niki Shaffer, Deputy Attorney General, Kevin Vienna, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Angela Borzachillo, Office of the Attorney General, San Diego, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Opinion:
ORDER
THOMAS, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Judge Pregerson did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.