Case Name: Dwayne L. EHRLICH, Appellant, v. Sharon L. EHRLICH, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-01-12
Citations: 537 So. 2d 164
Docket Number: No. 88-1191
Parties: Dwayne L. EHRLICH, Appellant, v. Sharon L. EHRLICH, Appellee.
Judges: SHARP, C.J., and COBB, J., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 537
Pages: 164–165

Head Matter:
Dwayne L. EHRLICH, Appellant, v. Sharon L. EHRLICH, Appellee.
No. 88-1191.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Jan. 12, 1989.
James R. Dressier, Cocoa Beach, for appellant.
Stephanie L. Dacosta, Cocoa Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
DAUKSCH, Judge.
This is an appeal from a marriage dissolution judgment. Just before trial of the issues, the attorneys announced that an agreement had been effected between the parties. At that point the lawyers and the judge attempted to put on the record the substance of the purported agreement. There is a distinct indication from this record that appellant was not in accord with all the terms of the supposed agreement. In particular it is noted that appellant was unwilling to agree to pay alimony to appellee after she remarried. There is no basis in the law for the payment of support alimony after remarriage of the recipient. Kirchman v. Kirchman, 389 So.2d 327 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).
The judgment is affirmed in all respects except the support and property awards and dispositions. We remand for trial on those matters.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.
SHARP, C.J., and COBB, J., concur.