Case Name: Johnathon IRONS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-04-23
Citations: 72 S.W.3d 619
Docket Number: No. ED 79633
Parties: Johnathon IRONS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 72
Pages: 619–620

Head Matter:
Johnathon IRONS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent.
No. ED 79633.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
April 23, 2002.
Gwenda R. Robertson, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Andrea Mazza Follett, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Johnathon Irons (Movant) appeals from a judgment denying his request for post-conviction relief under Rule 29.15 following an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court's judgment is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All rale references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2002, unless otherwise indicated.