Case Name: Jemal DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2007-06-26
Citations: 226 S.W.3d 898
Docket Number: No. ED 88642
Parties: Jemal DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J. and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 226
Pages: 898–899

Head Matter:
Jemal DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 88642.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
June 26, 2007.
Jessica M. Hathaway, Saint Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Joshua N. Corman, Assistant Attor ney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J. and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Jemal Davis appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting for the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).