Case Name: Radha SIMHADRI, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK, State University College at Buffalo, and Chadwick Nye, Defendants-Appellants, Barbara Weitzner-Lin and Nancy Russell, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-08-20
Citations: 42 F. App'x 528
Docket Number: Docket No. 01-9304
Parties: Radha SIMHADRI, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK, State University College at Buffalo, and Chadwick Nye, Defendants-Appellants, Barbara Weitzner-Lin and Nancy Russell, Defendants.
Judges: PRESENT: JACOBS, CABRANES and F.I. PARKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 42
Pages: 528–528

Head Matter:
Radha SIMHADRI, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK, State University College at Buffalo, and Chadwick Nye, Defendants-Appellants, Barbara Weitzner-Lin and Nancy Russell, Defendants.
Docket No. 01-9304.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Aug. 20, 2002.
Robert M. Goldfarb, Assistant Solicitor General (Daniel Smirlock, Deputy Solicitor General, of counsel; Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, on the brief), Office of the Attorney General of the State of New York, Albany, NY, for Appellant.
Sheila G. Graziano, Buffalo, NY, for Ap-pellees.
PRESENT: JACOBS, CABRANES and F.I. PARKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
SUMMARY ORDER
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of said District Court be and hereby is AFFIRMED.
Defendants timely appeal from an amended judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York entered on October 2, 2001 pursuant to a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff on her Equal Pay Act claim. Defendants also appeal from an order entered on September 30, 2001 denying their motion for judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(b) and their motion for a new trial pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59.
Because we discern no error on the part of the District Court, the October 2, 2001 amended judgment and September 30, 2001 order of the District Court are hereby AFFIRMED.