Case Name: Gregory ESPARZA, Petitioner-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. Betty MITCHELL, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/Cross-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-11-17
Citations: 80 F. App'x 997
Docket Number: Nos. 00-4615, 01-3025
Parties: Gregory ESPARZA, Petitioner-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. Betty MITCHELL, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/Cross-Appellee.
Judges: BEFORE: MERRITT, SUHRHEINRICH and DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 80
Pages: 997–998

Head Matter:
Gregory ESPARZA, Petitioner-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. Betty MITCHELL, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/Cross-Appellee.
Nos. 00-4615, 01-3025.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Nov. 17, 2003.
Jeffry F. Kelleher, Cleveland, OH, Angela Wilson Miller, Columbus, OH, for Petitioner-Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
Paul L. Nelson, Federal Public Defenders Office, Grand Rapids, MI, David M. Porter, Sacramento, CA, for Amicus Curiae.
Charles L. Wille, Attorney General’s Office of Ohio, Columbus, OH, for Respondenh-Appellant/Cross-Appellee.
BEFORE: MERRITT, SUHRHEINRICH and DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
Having received the Supreme Court's opinion decided November 3, 2003, in the above-entitled case which reverses and remands the case for "further proceedings consistent with this opinion," we hereby remand the case to the District Court for reconsideration in light of the Supreme Court's opinion.
Accordingly, it is so ORDERED.