Case Name: Nathaniel WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. James BRAY, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1966-12-21
Citations: 193 So. 2d 230
Docket Number: No. 364
Parties: Nathaniel WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. James BRAY, Appellee.
Judges: ANDREWS, Acting C. J., WALDEN, J., and TROWBRIDGE, C. PFEIFFER, Associate Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 193
Pages: 230–230

Head Matter:
Nathaniel WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. James BRAY, Appellee.
No. 364.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.
Dec. 21, 1966.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 18, 1967.
Norman C. Roettger, Jr., of Fleming, O’Bryan & Fleming, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
J. Jay Simons and Sheldon J. Schlesinger of Simons & Schlesinger, Hollywood, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The defendant, Nathaniel Williams, appeals an order granting plaintiff, James Bray, a new trial. We have reviewed the briefs and the record and find that the court did not abuse its discretion in granting a new trial. Cloud v. Fallis, Fla.1959, 110 So.2d 669; Collins Fruit Company v. Giglio, Fla.App.1966, 184 So.2d 447. As the granting of a new trial was proper there is no ' need to discuss the remaining points raised on appeal.
Affirmed.
ANDREWS, Acting C. J., WALDEN, J., and TROWBRIDGE, C. PFEIFFER, Associate Judge, concur.