Case Name: Cynthia KLUTSE, Appellant, v. Harold ROSE, etc., et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-04-09
Citations: 577 So. 2d 699
Docket Number: No. 90-1912
Parties: Cynthia KLUTSE, Appellant, v. Harold ROSE, etc., et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before BASKIN, COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 577
Pages: 699–699

Head Matter:
Cynthia KLUTSE, Appellant, v. Harold ROSE, etc., et al., Appellees.
No. 90-1912.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 9, 1991.
Teresa M. Pooler, Miami, for appellant.
Adorno & Zeder and Raoul G. Cantero, III, and Gloria L. Johnson, Coconut Grove, Carmen Dominguez Frick, Miami, for ap-pellees.
Before BASKIN, COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Based on the evidence presented, the trial court had ample basis on whiclj to conclude that the best interests of the children required denial of visitation at this time. See Adams v. Adams, 376 So.2d 1204, 1205 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert, denied, 388 So.2d 1109 (Fla.1980). The order under review is affirmed.