Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James CABACCANG, Defendant-Appellant; United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard T. Cabaccang, Defendant-Appellant; United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roy Toves Cabaccang, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-08-26
Citations: 341 F.3d 905
Docket Number: Nos. 98-10159, 98-10195, 98-10203
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James CABACCANG, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard T. Cabaccang, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roy Toves Cabaccang, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, KOZINSKI, O’SCANNLAIN, KLEINFELD, HAWKINS, GRABER, McKEOWN, W. FLETCHER, FISHER, PAEZ and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 341
Pages: 905–906

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James CABACCANG, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard T. Cabaccang, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roy Toves Cabaccang, Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 98-10159, 98-10195, 98-10203.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Filed Aug. 26, 2003.
Kathleen A. Felton, Lisa Simotas, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Elizabeth A. Fisher, Honolulu, HI, Rory K. Little, Hasting College of Law, San Francisco, CA, Arthur E. Ross, Sarah Courageous, Honolulu, HI, for Defendant-Appellant.
Roy Toves Cabaccang, USP-Leavenworth, Leavenworth, KS, pro se.
Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, KOZINSKI, O’SCANNLAIN, KLEINFELD, HAWKINS, GRABER, McKEOWN, W. FLETCHER, FISHER, PAEZ and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Order; Special Concurrence by Judge GRABER; Dissent by Judge KOZINSKI
ORDER
In United States v. Cabaccang, 332 F.3d 622, 637(9th Cir.2003), we remanded Roy Cabaccang's conviction on Count I for reconsideration in light of our holding that he did not violate 21 U.S.C. § 952. We now GRANT appellants' motion for clarification as to Count VI, and we remand that count to the district court. If the district court affirms Roy Cabaccang's conviction on Count I, his conviction and sentence on Count VI shall stand. If the district court reverses the conviction on Count I, it shall reconsider Roy Cabaccang's sentence on Count VI. We DENY appellants' motion to remand the remaining counts, including Count II, to the district court.