Case Name: Bradly M. CUNNINGHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James SCHARF; P. Skovold; Mindy Richardson, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-03-29
Citations: 6 F. App'x 648
Docket Number: No. 97-36011; D.C. No. CV-96-01678
Parties: Bradly M. CUNNINGHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James SCHARF; P. Skovold; Mindy Richardson, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before LEAVY, THOMAS, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 6
Pages: 648–648

Head Matter:
Bradly M. CUNNINGHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James SCHARF; P. Skovold; Mindy Richardson, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 97-36011. D.C. No. CV-96-01678.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 12, 2001 .
Decided March 29, 2001.
Before LEAVY, THOMAS, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, we deny appellant’s request for oral argument.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Bradly Cunningham, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing with prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to state a claim. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo and affirm. See Barnett v. Centoni, 31 F.3d 813, 816 (9th Cir.1994) (per curiam); see also Wash.Rev.Stat. § 4.24.470.
AFFIRMED.
. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.