Case Name: Darron Jermaine JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CRANFORD, Defendant-Appellee, and Harrington; Estridge; Roberson; Smith; Young; Barrett; Hanson; Warden; Dycus; Rivera, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-12-20
Citations: 671 F. App'x 225
Docket Number: No. 16-7306
Parties: Darron Jermaine JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CRANFORD, Defendant-Appellee, and Harrington; Estridge; Roberson; Smith; Young; Barrett; Hanson; Warden; Dycus; Rivera, Defendants.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 671
Pages: 225–226

Head Matter:
Darron Jermaine JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CRANFORD, Defendant-Appellee, and Harrington; Estridge; Roberson; Smith; Young; Barrett; Hanson; Warden; Dycus; Rivera, Defendants.
No. 16-7306
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: December 15, 2016
Decided: December 20, 2016
Darron Jermaine Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Vanessa N. Totten, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Ap-pellee.
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Darron Jermaine Jones appeals the district court's order granting Defendant Cranford's motion to dismiss Jones' 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2012) action against Cran-ford. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jones v. Cranford, No. 3:15-cv-00028-FDW (W.D.N.C. Aug. 24, 2016). We deny Jones' motion for default judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED