Case Name: AMATEUR ATHLETIC FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES, Relator, v. Leonard E. HOFFMAN, Jr., Visiting Judge, County Court at Law No. 4 of Dallas County, Texas, Respondent
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1994-12-16
Citations: 893 S.W.2d 602
Docket Number: No. 05-94-01852-CV
Parties: AMATEUR ATHLETIC FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES, Relator, v. Leonard E. HOFFMAN, Jr., Visiting Judge, County Court at Law No. 4 of Dallas County, Texas, Respondent.
Judges: Before BAKER, CHAPMAN and WHITTINGTON, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 893
Pages: 602–604

Head Matter:
AMATEUR ATHLETIC FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES, Relator, v. Leonard E. HOFFMAN, Jr., Visiting Judge, County Court at Law No. 4 of Dallas County, Texas, Respondent.
No. 05-94-01852-CV.
Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.
Dec. 16, 1994.
Blair G. Francis, Dallas, TX, for relator.
Ronald Z. Aland, Dallas, TX, for respondent.
Before BAKER, CHAPMAN and WHITTINGTON, JJ.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BAKER, Justice.
Respondent, a visiting judge sitting in the County Court of Law No. 4 of Dallas County, Texas, denied Relator's timely filed objection to Respondent as a visiting judge. Relator requests we order Respondent to vacate all orders he entered after Relator filed its objection and disqualify himself from any further proceedings in the underlying litigation. Once a party makes a timely objection to a visiting judge, .the assigned judge's disqualification is mandatory. We conditionally grant the writ.
FACTS
In this case, the record reflects Relator filed a timely objection to Respondent's assignment as a visiting judge to hear a matter involving Relator's pending case. Respondent overruled Relator's objection and over the objection proceeded to hear the Real Party In Interest's motion. The Respondent later entered orders based upon the hearing.
APPLICATION OF LAW TO FACTS
The applicable law is clear and settled. Once a party makes a timely objection, the assigned judge's disqualification is mandatory. Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 74.053(a)-(c) (Vernon Supp.1994); Rubin v. Hoffman, 843 S.W.2d 658, 659 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1992, orig. proceeding); Lewis v. Leftwich, 775 S.W.2d 848, 851 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1989, orig. proceeding).
An objection is timely under the government code if made before the assigned judge, sitting on the bench and in open court, calls the case to hearing or to trial. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 74.053(c) (Vernon Supp. 1994); Rubin, 843 S.W.2d at 659; Lewis, 775 S.W.2d at 850.
Any later order issued by the assigned judge is a nullity. Rubin, 843 S.W.2d at 659; Lewis, 775 S.W.2d at 851. Because the assigned judge's orders are void, a Relator can secure mandamus relief without showing he has no adequate remedy at law. Rubin, 843 S.W.2d at 659; Lewis, 775 S.W.2d at 851.
The record shows that Relator's objection was timely. Any order Respondent entered as the assigned judge is a nullity. We conditionally grant Relator's petition for writ of mandamus.