Case Name: Sylvester HAMILTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-01-26
Citations: 555 So. 2d 969
Docket Number: No. 88-02351
Parties: Sylvester HAMILTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: CAMPBELL, C.J., and RYDER and DANAHY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 555
Pages: 969–970

Head Matter:
Sylvester HAMILTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 88-02351.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Jan. 26, 1990.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender and Lawrence D. Shearer, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and Katherine V. Blanco, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm appellant's conviction for purchase of cannabis on the authority of Blankenship v. State, 545 So.2d 908 (Fla.2d DCA 1989). As in Blankenship we certify to the Florida Supreme Court the following question, which we deem to be of great public importance:
DOES SECTION 893.13, FLORIDA STATUTES (1987), VIOLATE THE ONE SUBJECT RULE OF THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION?
CAMPBELL, C.J., and RYDER and DANAHY, JJ., concur.
Section 893.13, Florida Statutes (1987), as amended by chapter 87-243, Laws of Florida.