Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Michael MAXWELL, Appellant; Michael MAXWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1997-01-07
Citations: 936 S.W.2d 869
Docket Number: No. 66814
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Michael MAXWELL, Appellant. Michael MAXWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 936
Pages: 869–869

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Michael MAXWELL, Appellant. Michael MAXWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 66814.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Jan. 7, 1997.
Judith C. LaRose, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Michael Maxwell, appeals the judgment of conviction for delivery of a con-troEed substance, RSMo § 195.211 (Cum. Supp.1990), entered by the Circuit Court of Ralls County after a jury trial. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment of conviction is supported by sufficient evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
. As appellant's brief raises no issues pertaining to the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion, his appeal from that judgment is deemed abandoned. State v. Gaines, 807 S.W.2d 678 n. 1 (Mo.App. E.D.1991).