Case Name: Nathaniel E. DOZIER, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Henry PARKER; William A. Robertson, Jr.; Joseph A. Leming, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-09-14
Citations: 332 F. App'x 847
Docket Number: No. 09-1560
Parties: Nathaniel E. DOZIER, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Henry PARKER; William A. Robertson, Jr.; Joseph A. Leming, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 332
Pages: 847–847

Head Matter:
Nathaniel E. DOZIER, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Henry PARKER; William A. Robertson, Jr.; Joseph A. Leming, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 09-1560.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 10, 2009.
Decided: Sept. 14, 2009.
Nathaniel E. Dozier, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Charles Richard Cranwell, Cranwell Moore & Emick, PLC, Roanoke, Virginia, Mark Quentin Emick, Jr., Cranwell Moore & Emick, PLC, Vinton, Virginia, for Ap-pellees.
Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Nathaniel E. Dozier, Jr., appeals the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his civil action against Henry Parker and William A. Robertson, Jr., members of the Board of Supervisors of Prince George County, Virginia, and Joseph A. Leming, a former member. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dozier v. Parker, No. 3:09-cv-00019-JRS, 2009 WL 1147916 (E.D.Va. Apr. 22, 2009). We deny the Appellees' motion to dismiss the appeal or disregard Dozier's informal reply brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.