Case Name: George SINKS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-10-12
Citations: 661 So. 2d 303
Docket Number: No. 84832
Parties: George SINKS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 661
Pages: 303–304

Head Matter:
George SINKS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 84832.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Oct. 12, 1995.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender and Margaret Good-Earnest, Assistant Public Defender, Chief, Appellate Division, Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, West Palm Beach, for Petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; Joan Fowler, Senior Assistant Attorney General; and Melynda L. Melear and Sara B. Mayer, Assistant Attorneys General, West Palm Beach, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have for review Sinks v. State, 646 So.2d 229 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994), in which the district court addressed the same question we recently answered in Gilyard v. State, 653 So.2d 1024 (Fla.1995). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.
In accordance with our decision in Gilyard, we approve Sinks' sentence to the extent that it combines incarceration and community control because neither the recommended range nor the permitted range was phrased in the disjunctive. However, this sentence impermissibly exceeds a one-cell increase from the original guideline range cell. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14); Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d 838 (Fla.1989). We therefore remand to the trial court to reduce the sentence by the amount it exceeds the next higher cell. Id. Sinks does not have to be present for resentencing.
It is so ordered.
GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.