Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Vincent D. Cardone, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1986-10-07
Citations: 68 N.Y.2d 829
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Vincent D. Cardone, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 68
Pages: 829–830

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Vincent D. Cardone, Appellant.
Argued September 3, 1986;
decided October 7, 1986
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Charles R. Katz and Richard L. Baumgarten for appellant.
Robert C. Noonan, Special Prosecutor, for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of County Court should be affirmed.
We agree that the Trial Judge did not err in refusing to charge the defense of justification pursuant to Penal Law § 35.05 (1). That statute provides in part that conduct which would otherwise constitute an offense is justifiable and not criminal when "[s]uch conduct is required or authorized by law or by a judicial decree". Defendant's belief that his conduct was authorized does not warrant submission of a justification charge to the jury (compare, Model Penal Code §3.03 [3] [a]).
We have considered defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.
Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr., concur.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.