Case Name: Brittanie STANLEY, Appellant, v. GREAT GLAM, INC.; Great Glam Store 1 Inc.; and Great Glam Store 2 Inc., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2014-06-11
Citations: 161 So. 3d 457
Docket Number: No. 2D13-2647
Parties: Brittanie STANLEY, Appellant, v. GREAT GLAM, INC.; Great Glam Store 1 Inc.; and Great Glam Store 2 Inc., Appellees.
Judges: ALTENBERND, SILBERMAN, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 161
Pages: 457–458

Head Matter:
Brittanie STANLEY, Appellant, v. GREAT GLAM, INC.; Great Glam Store 1 Inc.; and Great Glam Store 2 Inc., Appellees.
No. 2D13-2647.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
June 11, 2014.
Ronald W. Fraley of The Fraley Firm, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.
Christina C. Hebert, Tampa, for Appel-lees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Brittanie Stanley appeals a final judgment that was entered based on the trial court's earlier decision to dismiss a claim of pregnancy discrimination under the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, which is codified at sections 760.01 through 760.11 and section 509.092 of the Florida Statutes. The limited issue of law in this case turns on whether section 760.10(l)(a), Florida Statutes (2012), prohibits discrimination on the basis of pregnancy by an employer in Florida. In a recent decision, the Florida Supreme Court interpreted section 760.10(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2011), as prohibiting discrimination by an employer on the basis of pregnancy. See Delva v. Cont'l Grp., Inc., 137 So.3d 371 (Fla.2014). Accordingly, we reverse the final judgment and remand for further proceedings.
Reversed and remanded.
ALTENBERND, SILBERMAN, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.