Case Name: Tina GORDON, a minor, by and through her next friend, Sophia MARTIN, and Dareisha Brandon, a minor, by and through her next friend, Sophia Martin, Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-06-18
Citations: 77 S.W.3d 709
Docket Number: No. ED 80464
Parties: Tina GORDON, a minor, by and through her next friend, Sophia MARTIN, and Dareisha Brandon, a minor, by and through her next friend, Sophia Martin, Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before GEORGE W. DRAPER III, P.J. and MARY R. RUSSELL, J. and MARY K HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 77
Pages: 709–710

Head Matter:
Tina GORDON, a minor, by and through her next friend, Sophia MARTIN, and Dareisha Brandon, a minor, by and through her next friend, Sophia Martin, Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 80464.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
June 18, 2002.
Patricia A. Hageman, City Counselor, Edward J. Hanlon and Michael F. Stelzer, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Devereaux, Stokes, Nolan, Rutledge & Fernandez, P.C., Michael D. Stokes, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before GEORGE W. DRAPER III, P.J. and MARY R. RUSSELL, J. and MARY K HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
City of St. Louis (Defendant) appeals from a judgment in the amount of $311,913.00 rendered against it in an action for personal injuries brought by Tina Gordon and Dareisha Brandon, minors, by and through their next friend, Sophia Martin, (Plaintiffs) arising out of the death of their mother, Anita Martin!
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).