Case Name: Dante CRAIG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. A.F. HERNANDEZ, Lieutenant; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-05-03
Citations: 430 F. App'x 617
Docket Number: No. 09-15904
Parties: Dante CRAIG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. A.F. HERNANDEZ, Lieutenant; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 430
Pages: 617–617

Head Matter:
Dante CRAIG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. A.F. HERNANDEZ, Lieutenant; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 09-15904.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 5, 2011.
Filed May 3, 2011.
Dante Craig, Delano, CA, pro se.
Before: B. FLETCHER, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
California state prisoner Dante Craig appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that prison officials violated his Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment rights when they housed him with a documented enemy. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.2000). We affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Craig's action because the second amended complaint failed to allege any specific facts showing that he was entitled to relief. See Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555, 127 S.Ct. 1955, 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007) (a complaint must go beyond "labels and conclusions, and a formulaic recitation of the elements of a cause of action," and provide the grounds for entitlement to relief).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.