Case Name: Mary Mulligan, as Administratrix of the Estate of Bernard Mulligan, Deceased, Respondent, v. Bernard Wetchler et al., Defendants, and City of New York, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1972-07-07
Citations: 30 N.Y.2d 951
Docket Number: 
Parties: Mary Mulligan, as Administratrix of the Estate of Bernard Mulligan, Deceased, Respondent, v. Bernard Wetchler et al., Defendants, and City of New York, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 30
Pages: 951–951

Head Matter:
Mary Mulligan, as Administratrix of the Estate of Bernard Mulligan, Deceased, Respondent, v. Bernard Wetchler et al., Defendants, and City of New York, Appellant.
Submitted June 26, 1972;
decided July 7, 1972.
W. Bernard Richland for motion.
J. Lee Rankin, Corporation Counsel (Bernard Burstein of counsel), opposed.

Opinion:
Motion granted and the appeal dismissed, with costs and $10 costs of motion, upon the grounds that the Appellate Division order did not direct modification of the judgment appealed from in a substantial respect and that defendant is not aggrieved by the modification (CPLR 5601, subd. [a], par. [iii]; and see Weinberg v. Wishweg Realty Corp., 29 N Y 2d 648; Amadeus, Inc. v. State of New York, 29 N Y 2d 634; and that the dissent is not upon a stated question of law (CPLR 5601, subd. [a], par. [i]).