Case Name: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. ANNA KUDELKA, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1927-01-31
Citations: 103 N.J.L. 506
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. ANNA KUDELKA, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 103
Pages: 506–506

Head Matter:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. ANNA KUDELKA, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Submitted October 29, 1926
Decided January 31, 1927.
For the defendant in error, Albert H. Holland.
For the plaintiff in error, Elmer W. Romine.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Minturn, Black, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.