Case Name: Barry P. GRASS, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Karen L. Grass; James L. Grass; Jennifer L. Grass; Michael R. Grass, Plaintiffs, v. EASTERN ASSOCIATED COAL COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee, and Nohl A. Braun, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-03-27
Citations: 222 F. App'x 267
Docket Number: No. 06-2064
Parties: Barry P. GRASS, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Karen L. Grass; James L. Grass; Jennifer L. Grass; Michael R. Grass, Plaintiffs, v. EASTERN ASSOCIATED COAL COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee, and Nohl A. Braun, Defendant.
Judges: Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 222
Pages: 267–268

Head Matter:
Barry P. GRASS, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Karen L. Grass; James L. Grass; Jennifer L. Grass; Michael R. Grass, Plaintiffs, v. EASTERN ASSOCIATED COAL COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee, and Nohl A. Braun, Defendant.
No. 06-2064.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 22, 2007.
Decided: March 27, 2007.
Barry P. Grass, Appellant Pro Se. Sara Ellen Hauptfuehrer, Steptoe & Johnson, Clarksburg, West Virginia; Thomas John Hurney, Jr., Erin R. Stankewicz, Jackson & Kelly, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Barry P. Grass appeals the district court's orders accepting the magistrate judge's recommendations and denying relief in his civil action alleging claims against his former employer and physician. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Grass v. Eastern Assoc. Coal. Co., No. 2:05-cv-00496, 2006 WL 771911 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 23, 2006; filed Aug. 28, 2006, 2006 WL 2527810 & entered Aug. 30, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.