Case Name: H. Cecil JACKSON, respondent, v. REDFERN COMPANY, Limited, appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1915-12-24
Citations: 156 N.Y.S. 1128
Docket Number: 
Parties: H. Cecil JACKSON, respondent, v. REDFERN COMPANY, Limited, appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 156
Pages: 1128–1128

Head Matter:
H. Cecil JACKSON, respondent, v. REDFERN COMPANY, Limited, appellant.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
December 24, 1915.)

Opinion:
Order, in so far as appealed from, reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion in its entirety granted, with $10 costs, upon the ground that, according to the well-settled practice as established by many decisions, the defendant is entitled to have a full bill of particulars as asked for in the notice of motion. See American Woolen Co. of New York v. Altkrug, 137 App. Div. 621, 122 N. Y. Supp. 394; Rhodes v. Adams, 113 App. Div. 304, 98 N. Y. Supp. 913; Dempsey v. Bergen County Traction Co., 74 App. Div. 474, 77 N. Y. Supp. 456; Dwyer v. Slattery, 118 App. Div. 345, 103 N. Y. Supp. 433; Hoareau v. Schwartzkopf, 142 App. Div. 69, 70, 126 N. Y. Supp. 448; and Havholm v. Whale Creek Iron Works, 159 App. Div. 578, at 582, 144 N. Y. Supp. 833. Jenks, P. J., and Stapleton, Mills, Rich, and Putnam, JJ., concur.