Case Name: James BROOKER a/k/a, Roosevelt Brister, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1997-10-08
Citations: 699 So. 2d 1046
Docket Number: No. 96-3169
Parties: James BROOKER a/k/a, Roosevelt Brister, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before NESBITT, COPE and FLETCHER, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 699
Pages: 1046–1046

Head Matter:
James BROOKER a/k/a, Roosevelt Brister, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 96-3169.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 8, 1997.
Nathaniel L. Barone, Jr., for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Doquyen T. Nguyen, Assistant Attorney General, and Douglas J. Glaid, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
Before NESBITT, COPE and FLETCHER, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Upon review of the plea colloquy and sentencing order, we conclude that the plea agreement was for a sentence as a habitual violent felony offender, including the mandatory minimum sentences associated therewith. See § 775.084(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1988); Brister v. State, 622 So.2d 552, 553 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). That being so, the mandatory minimum sentences were within the legal authority of the court to impose. The order denying motion to correct illegal sentence is affirmed.