Case Name: Nasra M. ARAFAT, Appellant, v. Mohamed JHALIL, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2013-01-09
Citations: 105 So. 3d 601
Docket Number: No. 4D11-4722
Parties: Nasra M. ARAFAT, Appellant, v. Mohamed JHALIL, Appellee.
Judges: MAY, C.J., GROSS and GERBER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 105
Pages: 601–601

Head Matter:
Nasra M. ARAFAT, Appellant, v. Mohamed JHALIL, Appellee.
No. 4D11-4722.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jan. 9, 2013.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 19, 2013.
Nasra M. Arafat, Coral Springs, pro se.
Mohamed Jhalil, Sunrise, pro se.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979) ("Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.").
MAY, C.J., GROSS and GERBER, JJ., concur.