Case Name: Tommy CARVER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Boyd BENNETT; Utilization Review Board; Doctor Campbell; Robert Uhren, M.D.; David R. Mitchell, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-11-25
Citations: 353 F. App'x 859
Docket Number: No. 09-7637
Parties: Tommy CARVER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Boyd BENNETT; Utilization Review Board; Doctor Campbell; Robert Uhren, M.D.; David R. Mitchell, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 353
Pages: 859–859

Head Matter:
Tommy CARVER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Boyd BENNETT; Utilization Review Board; Doctor Campbell; Robert Uhren, M.D.; David R. Mitchell, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 09-7637.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 17, 2009.
Decided: Nov. 25, 2009.
Tommy Carver, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Tommy Carver appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Carver v. Bennett, No. 1:09-cv-00283-GCM (W-D.N.C. Aug. 14, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.