Case Name: Smith Bros. Plumbing Co., Plaintiff, v. Engine Air Service, Inc., Appellant; Monroe Miller, Respondent, et al., Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1952-05-05
Citations: 279 A.D. 1082
Docket Number: 
Parties: Smith Bros. Plumbing Co., Plaintiff, v. Engine Air Service, Inc., Appellant; Monroe Miller, Respondent, et al., Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 279
Pages: 1082–1082

Head Matter:
Smith Bros. Plumbing Co., Plaintiff, v. Engine Air Service, Inc., Appellant; Monroe Miller, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Opinion:
The County Court had jurisdiction to try respondent's claim (Civ. Prac. Act, § 69). The facts established that respondent did not fully perform the employment agreement, in that the commitment procured was not unconditional and was not in accordance with the mortgage loan described in the employment agreement. Johnston, Acting P. J., Adel, Wenzel, MacCrate and Schmidt, JJ., concur. [See 280 App. Div. 806.]