Case Name: OAKWOOD REALTY CO. v. NOLTE; SAME v. SYMMES; SAME v. WILDERMLTH
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1926-08-18
Citations: 4 Ohio Law Abs. 755
Docket Number: Nos. 20061-63
Parties: OAKWOOD REALTY CO. v. NOLTE SAME v. SYMMES SAME v. WILDERMLTH
Judges: 
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 4
Pages: 755–756

Head Matter:
OAKWOOD REALTY CO. v. NOLTE SAME v. SYMMES SAME v. WILDERMLTH
Nos. 20061-63.
Supreme Court
Dock. Aug. 18, 1926;
4 Abs. 575.
Attorneys — James & Coolidge for pltf; Bowman & Shively for defts; all of Dayton.

Opinion:
The question herein involved is whether a covenant contained in a uniform deed to lots in a subdivision to the effect that grantor land company agrees to pave "that portion of the street abutting on said lot" can be construed to include not only street of the subdivision abutting the lot at the time of the deed was executed, but also a street subsequently established outside the subdivision, but abutting the lots on the edge of subdivision.