Case Name: INVERSIONES ARMADENI, S.A., Appellant, v. Jose TEJEDO, Jr., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1997-09-24
Citations: 700 So. 2d 416
Docket Number: No. 96-3149
Parties: INVERSIONES ARMADENI, S.A., Appellant, v. Jose TEJEDO, Jr., Appellee.
Judges: Before COPE, GERSTEN and SHEVIN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 700
Pages: 416–416

Head Matter:
INVERSIONES ARMADENI, S.A., Appellant, v. Jose TEJEDO, Jr., Appellee.
No. 96-3149.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Sept. 24, 1997.
Rehearing Denied Nov. 5, 1997.
Mark A. Marder, Miami, for appellant.
Jose M. Cervera, Miami, for appellee.
Before COPE, GERSTEN and SHEVIN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the summary judgment entered in favor of the appellee. A genuine issue of material fact exists as to the date the appellant knew or should have known of the existence of the fraudulent concealment action, and thus summary judgment is precluded. See Nardone v. Reynolds, 333 So.2d 25 (Fla.1976); Brugiere v. Credit Commerciale France, 679 So.2d 875 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Grossman v. Greenberg, 619 So.2d 406 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 629 So.2d 133 (Fla. 1993).
Reversed.