Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Terrence CROSS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-01-21
Citations: 361 F. App'x 494
Docket Number: No. 09-7825
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Terrence CROSS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 361
Pages: 494–494

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Terrence CROSS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-7825.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 14, 2010.
Decided: Jan. 21, 2010.
William Terrence Cross, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
William Terrence Cross appeals the district court's order denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b)(4) motion to void his criminal judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We note that Cross attempted to use a civil rule to attack his criminal judgment and that he has submitted the federal jurisdiction argument numerous times and has not demonstrated error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. United States v. Cross, No. 2:03-cr-00010-RBS-l (E.D.Va. Sept. 3, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.