Case Name: Curlee SHERMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ORANGEBURG MENTAL HEALTH, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-09-20
Citations: 109 F. App'x 567
Docket Number: No. 04-1580
Parties: Curlee SHERMAN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. ORANGEBURG MENTAL HEALTH, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 109
Pages: 567–567

Head Matter:
Curlee SHERMAN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. ORANGEBURG MENTAL HEALTH, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 04-1580.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 25, 2004.
Decided Sept. 20, 2004.
Curlee Sherman, Appellant pro se.
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 86(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Curlee Sherman appeals the district court's judgment adopting the magistrate judge's order that dismissed his complaint pursuant to a previously entered prefiling review order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sherman v. Orangeburg Mental Health, No. CA-04-585-5 (D.S.C. filed Apr. 22, 2004, entered Apr. 23, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED