Case Name: Walter Glinka, Appellant, v. The Sun Indemnity Company of New York, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1935-04
Citations: 244 A.D. 724
Docket Number: 
Parties: Walter Glinka, Appellant, v. The Sun Indemnity Company of New York, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 244
Pages: 724–725

Head Matter:
Walter Glinka, Appellant, v. The Sun Indemnity Company of New York, Respondent.

Opinion:
In an action brought pursuant to section 109 of the Insurance Law, order dismissing complaint on the ground that it appears on the face thereof that it faEs to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action reversed on the law, with ten doEars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, with leave to the defendant to answer within ten days from the entry of the order herein. The motion to dismiss the complaint is not timely within rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice. The plaintiff is free to serve an amended complaint if so advised. Hagarty, Carswell, Seudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.