Case Name: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. FULGENCIO GONZALEZ-MONASTERIO (A/K/A FULGENCIO G. MONASTERIO, DANIEL CRUZ, FOLENCEO GONZALEZ, WILFREDO GONZALEZ, FULGENCIO GONZALEZMONASTERIO, DAVID MENDEZ, FULGENCIO MONASTERIO, FULGENCIO MONESTESIO, FULGENZIA O. GONSALEZ, AND FOLENCO GONZALEZ), DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT; STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. BERNARDO MARTINEZ (A/K/A BERNARDO MARTINEZ, AND ODILON VELASQUEZ), DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 2017-03-27
Citations: 228 N.J. 335
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. FULGENCIO GONZALEZ-MONASTERIO (A/K/A FULGENCIO G. MONASTERIO, DANIEL CRUZ, FOLENCEO GONZALEZ, WILFREDO GONZALEZ, FULGENCIO GONZALEZMONASTERIO, DAVID MENDEZ, FULGENCIO MONASTERIO, FULGENCIO MONESTESIO, FULGENZIA O. GONSALEZ, AND FOLENCO GONZALEZ), DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. BERNARDO MARTINEZ (A/K/A BERNARDO MARTINEZ, AND ODILON VELASQUEZ), DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 228
Pages: 335–335

Head Matter:
157 A.3d 414
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. FULGENCIO GONZALEZ-MONASTERIO (A/K/A FULGENCIO G. MONASTERIO, DANIEL CRUZ, FOLENCEO GONZALEZ, WILFREDO GONZALEZ, FULGENCIO GONZALEZMONASTERIO, DAVID MENDEZ, FULGENCIO MONASTERIO, FULGENCIO MONESTESIO, FULGENZIA O. GONSALEZ, AND FOLENCO GONZALEZ), DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. BERNARDO MARTINEZ (A/K/A BERNARDO MARTINEZ, AND ODILON VELASQUEZ), DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
MARCH 27, 2017

Opinion:
ORDER
This matter having been duly considered by the Court;
It is ORDERED that to provide guidance to the trial court on remand, the Appellate Division's decision is summarily modified as follows. The trial court did not err — as the Appellate Division concluded — in instructing the jury on principles of accomplice liability concerning the charge of hindering apprehension, N.J.S.A. 2C:29-3.
The Court having determined that certification was improvidently granted as to all other issues presented in this appeal;
It is ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.