Case Name: Marvin D. HEDGER, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1978-04-04
Citations: 564 S.W.2d 938
Docket Number: No. 39339
Parties: Marvin D. HEDGER, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: CLEMENS, P. J., and SMITH, J., concur.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 564
Pages: 938–938

Head Matter:
Marvin D. HEDGER, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 39339.
Missouri Court of Appeals, St. Louis District, Division One.
April 4, 1978.
O. J. Gibson, Jr., Cape Girardeau, for movant-appellant.
John D. Ashcroft, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Opinion:
McMillian, Judge.
Appellant appeals from an order of the circuit court denying, without an evidentia-ry hearing, his Rule 27.26, V.A.M.R., motion. Appellant asserts that the trial court abused its discretion in failing to grant an evidentiary hearing because allegations and issues of fact presented in his motion were sufficient as a matter of law. We disagree and affirm.
We have reviewed the record of the guilty plea and read the briefs of the parties. The facts alleged in support of appellant's grounds for relief are refuted by the record made at the time of his plea of guilty to the charge and his answers given therein to the court. Smith v. State, 513 S.W.2d 407 (Mo. banc 1974); Hogshooter v. State, 514 S.W.2d 109 (Mo.App.1974); and Collins v. State, 556 S.W.2d 225 (Mo.App.1977).
Any further discussion of appellant's allegations would not have any precedential value, and would only serve to lengthen this opinion.
Judgment affirmed.
CLEMENS, P. J., and SMITH, J., concur.