Case Name: Patsy N. SAKUMA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF the TROPICS AT WAIKELE, by it's Board of Directors and James S. Kometani, Commissioner, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-10-05
Citations: 398 F. App'x 286
Docket Number: No. 09-17448
Parties: Patsy N. SAKUMA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF the TROPICS AT WAIKELE, by it’s Board of Directors and James S. Kometani, Commissioner, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: WALLACE, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 398
Pages: 286–287

Head Matter:
Patsy N. SAKUMA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF the TROPICS AT WAIKELE, by it’s Board of Directors and James S. Kometani, Commissioner, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 09-17448.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 22, 2010.
Filed Oct. 5, 2010.
Patsy N. Sakuma, Los Angeles, CA, pro se.
Kevin Paul Hisami Sumida, Esquire, Sumida & Tsuchiyama, L.L.C., Honolulu, HI, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: WALLACE, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
The district court properly dismissed Patsy N. Sakuma's ("Sakuma") action as moot because her condominium had been sold and there was no longer a controversy as to which effective relief could be granted. See Vill. of Gambell v. Babbitt, 999 F.2d 403, 406 (9th Cir.1993).
Sakuma's remaining contentions are unpersuasive.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.