Case Name: In the Interest of M.M.H., a minor. In the Interest of C.E.C., a minor. In the Interest of J.C.C., a minor. In the Interest of I.M.H., a minor. Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. C.V.H., Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-04-18
Citations: 16 S.W.3d 721
Docket Number: Nos. ED 76099-ED 76102
Parties: In the Interest of M.M.H., a minor. In the Interest of C.E.C., a minor. In the Interest of J.C.C., a minor. In the Interest of I.M.H., a minor. Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. C.V.H., Appellant.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., J. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 16
Pages: 721–722

Head Matter:
In the Interest of M.M.H., a minor. In the Interest of C.E.C., a minor. In the Interest of J.C.C., a minor. In the Interest of I.M.H., a minor. Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. C.V.H., Appellant.
Nos. ED 76099-ED 76102.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
April 18, 2000.
Robin Ransom Vannoy, Family Court of St. Louis County, St. Louis, for respondent.
John R. Bird, St. Louis, for appellant.
Rene’ E. Lusser, Lusser, Hughes & Lusser, St. Louis, guardian ad litem of juveniles.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., J. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
In this consolidated appeal, mother appeals from the judgments of the trial court terminating her parental rights to her four minor children. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo.1976).
Am opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).