Case Name: SUMMUM, a corporate sole and church, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PLEASANT GROVE CITY, a municipal corporation; Jim Danklef, Mayor; Mark Atwood, City Council Member; Cindy Boyd, City Council Member; Mike Daniels, City Council Member; Darold McDade, City Council Member; Jeff Wilson, City Council Member; Carol Harmer, former City Council Member; G. Keith Corry, former City Council Member; Frank Mills, City Administrator, Defendants-Appellees; and Summum, a corporate sole and church, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Duchesne City, a governmental entity; Clinton Park, Mayor of Duchesne City; Yordys Nelson; Nancy Wager; Paul Tanner; Darwin McKee; Jeannie Mecham, city council members, Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-08-24
Citations: 499 F.3d 1170
Docket Number: Nos. 06-4057, 05-4162, 05-4168, 05-4272 & 05-4282
Parties: SUMMUM, a corporate sole and church, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PLEASANT GROVE CITY, a municipal corporation; Jim Danklef, Mayor; Mark Atwood, City Council Member; Cindy Boyd, City Council Member; Mike Daniels, City Council Member; Darold McDade, City Council Member; Jeff Wilson, City Council Mem ber; Carol Harmer, former City Council Member; G. Keith Corry, former City Council Member; Frank Mills, City Administrator, Defendants-Appellees. and Summum, a corporate sole and church, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Duchesne City, a governmental entity; Clinton Park, Mayor of Duchesne City; Yordys Nelson; Nancy Wager; Paul Tanner; Darwin McKee; Jeannie Mecham, city council members, Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellants.
Judges: Before TACHA, Chief Judge, KELLY, HENRY, BRISCOE, LUCERO, MURPHY, HARTZ, O’BRIEN, McConnell, tymkoyich, GORSUCH, and HOLMES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 499
Pages: 1170–1182

Head Matter:
SUMMUM, a corporate sole and church, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PLEASANT GROVE CITY, a municipal corporation; Jim Danklef, Mayor; Mark Atwood, City Council Member; Cindy Boyd, City Council Member; Mike Daniels, City Council Member; Darold McDade, City Council Member; Jeff Wilson, City Council Mem ber; Carol Harmer, former City Council Member; G. Keith Corry, former City Council Member; Frank Mills, City Administrator, Defendants-Appellees. and Summum, a corporate sole and church, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Duchesne City, a governmental entity; Clinton Park, Mayor of Duchesne City; Yordys Nelson; Nancy Wager; Paul Tanner; Darwin McKee; Jeannie Mecham, city council members, Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellants.
Nos. 06-4057, 05-4162, 05-4168, 05-4272 & 05-4282.
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
Aug. 24, 2007.
James L. Harris, Jr., Brian M. Barnard, Utah Legal Clinic, Salt Lake City, UT, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Francis J. Manion, Geoffrey R. Surtees, American Center for Law & Justice, New Hope, KY, Edward L. White, III, Thomas More Law Center, Ann Arbor, MI, Meb W. Anderson, Stirba & Associates, Salt Lake City, UT, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before TACHA, Chief Judge, KELLY, HENRY, BRISCOE, LUCERO, MURPHY, HARTZ, O’BRIEN, McConnell, tymkoyich, GORSUCH, and HOLMES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
These matters are before the court on two separate petitions for rehearing, both with en banc suggestions, filed by the ap-pellees. The petitions were filed separately and correspond to the two opinions issued in these appeals on April 17, 2007.
The requests for panel rehearing are denied by the original panel which decided these cases.
The en bane petitions were transmitted to all of the judges of the court who are in regular active service. A poll was requested. Through an equally divided vote, the decisions of the panel will stand. See Fed. R.App. P. 35(a); 10th Cir. R. 35.5 (noting that a majority of the active judges of the court may order rehearing en banc). Accordingly, the en banc requests are denied. Judges Lucero, O'Brien, McConnell, Tym-kovich, Gorsuch and Holmes would grant rehearing en banc. Judges Lucero and McConnell have filed dissents to the denial. They are attached and incorporated in this order. Judge Gorsuch has joined in Judge McConnell's dissent. Judge Tacha, writing separately, has responded. That response is also incorporated in this order.