Case Name: Constance D. Kreindler, Appellant-Respondent, v. Irving Trust Company et al., Respondents, and Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam & Roberts et al., Respondents-Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1966-10-21
Citations: 26 A.D.2d 878
Docket Number: 
Parties: Constance D. Kreindler, Appellant-Respondent, v. Irving Trust Company et al., Respondents, and Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam & Roberts et al., Respondents-Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 26
Pages: 878–878

Head Matter:
Constance D. Kreindler, Appellant-Respondent, v. Irving Trust Company et al., Respondents, and Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam & Roberts et al., Respondents-Appellants.

Opinion:
Motion for reargument granted, without costs. On reargument the court adheres to its original decision. As respects the fiduciary's attorneys' right to compensation, recourse must be had in the first instance at least to the provisions of Article VI of the trust agreement, and we clearly held that CPLR 8303 (subd. [a], par. 4) was inapplicable at this juncture. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur.