Case Name: Marcos BONIA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2016-08-26
Citations: 197 So. 3d 1280
Docket Number: No. 5D15-2492
Parties: Marcos BONIA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: LAWSON, C.J., ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 197
Pages: 1280–1280

Head Matter:
Marcos BONIA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D15-2492.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Aug. 26, 2016.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Jacqueline Rae Luker, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison Leigh Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant challenges the order summarily denying his motion for return of property. The State properly concedes error in that the trial court did not address the applicability of section 705.105, Florida Statutes. See Davis v. State, 63 So.3d 888, 889 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011) (holding that lower court must attach records to establish property was seized as evidence to support summary denial of motion for return of property pursuant to section 705.105); Stevenson v. State, 688 So.2d 962 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) (reversing denial of motion for return . of property pursuant to section 705.105 where- record did. not establish statute applied).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
LAWSON, C.J., ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ., concur.