Case Name: Josue EDMONDS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. D. Scott DODRILL, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-08-15
Citations: 17 F. App'x 81
Docket Number: No. 01-6525
Parties: Josue EDMONDS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. D. Scott DODRILL, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 17
Pages: 81–81

Head Matter:
Josue EDMONDS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. D. Scott DODRILL, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 01-6525.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 9, 2001.
Decided Aug. 15, 2001.
Josué Edmonds, pro se.
Before NIEMEYER, DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Josué Edmonds appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Edmonds v. Dodrill, No. CA-01-175-5-BO (E.D.N.C. filed Mar. 6, 2001; entered Mar. 8, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.