Case Name: Ignatzio GIULIANO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN FCI WILLIAMSBURG, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-09-30
Citations: 540 F. App'x 202
Docket Number: No. 13-6978
Parties: Ignatzio GIULIANO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN FCI WILLIAMSBURG, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 540
Pages: 202–203

Head Matter:
Ignatzio GIULIANO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN FCI WILLIAMSBURG, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 13-6978.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 26, 2013.
Decided: Sept. 30, 2013.
Ignatzio Giuliano, Appellant Pro Se.
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ignatzio Giuliano, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2013) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in for-ma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Giuliano v. Warden, No. 6:13-cv-00311-MBS, 2013 WL 2470962 (D.S.C. June 7, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.