Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Carl Anderson, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1993-04-19
Citations: 192 A.D.2d 665
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carl Anderson, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 192
Pages: 665–665

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carl Anderson, Appellant.
[598 NYS2d 716]

Opinion:
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lonschein, J.), rendered April 9, 1991, convicting him of burglary in the second degree and petit larceny, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We agree that errors were made by the trial court during the cross-examination of the complaining witness, and during the charge to the jury. However, in light of the strong identification testimony of the complainant, we conclude that the errors, even when considered cumulatively, were harmless (see, People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230).
We find that the sentence is not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Eiber, J. P., O'Brien, Ritter and Copertino, JJ., concur.