Case Name: Jamise Jermaine CALLOWAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY JAIL CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-09-13
Citations: 243 F. App'x 320
Docket Number: No. 07-15305
Parties: Jamise Jermaine CALLOWAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY JAIL CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 243
Pages: 320–321

Head Matter:
Jamise Jermaine CALLOWAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY JAIL CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 07-15305.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 10, 2007.
Filed Sept. 13, 2007.
Jamise Jermaine Calloway, Vacaville, CA, pro se.
Gregory C. Harvey, Bernard L. Knapp, Esq., Office of County Counsel, Martinez, CA, W. David Walker, Craddick, Candland and Conti, Danville, CA Trace O. Maiorino, Esq., Office of the California Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: PREGERSON, KOZINSKI and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. RApp. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
A review of the response to the court's June 12, 2007 order to show cause and the opening brief indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.
All pending motions are denied as moot.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.