Case Name: Charles H. Mead et al., Resp'ts, v. Edgar Hartwell et al., App'lts
Court: New York City Cout
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1894-05-18
Citations: 59 N.Y. St. Rep. 895
Docket Number: 
Parties: Charles H. Mead et al., Resp'ts, v. Edgar Hartwell et al., App’lts.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 59
Pages: 895–895

Head Matter:
New York City Court—General Term.
Filed May 18, 1894.
Charles H. Mead et al., Resp'ts, v. Edgar Hartwell et al., App’lts.

Opinion:
McCarthy, J.
There is nothing in the objection of the appellants ; it is too finely drawn. The summons complies with the order and its intent. The order is therefore affirmed, with costs. All concur.