Case Name: Andrew Adema, Plaintiff, v. R.L.S. Equipment Co., Inc., et al., Defendants. R.L.S. Equipment Co., Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Knapp Farms, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1992-12-30
Citations: 188 A.D.2d 1083
Docket Number: 
Parties: Andrew Adema, Plaintiff, v R.L.S. Equipment Co., Inc., et al., Defendants. R.L.S. Equipment Co., Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v Knapp Farms, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 188
Pages: 1083–1083

Head Matter:
Andrew Adema, Plaintiff, v R.L.S. Equipment Co., Inc., et al., Defendants. R.L.S. Equipment Co., Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v Knapp Farms, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

Opinion:
Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly struck the first affirmative defense to the third-party complaint and the counterclaim asserted in the third-party answer (see, CPLR 3211 [a] [7]; Dole v Dow Chem. Co., 30 NY2d 143). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Mordue, J. — Dismiss Affirmative Defenses.) Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Balio, Fallon and Davis, JJ.