Case Name: Dale Joseph DUNN, Appellant, v. Kathleen Dionn DUNN, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-08-06
Citations: 81 S.W.3d 722
Docket Number: No. ED 79957
Parties: Dale Joseph DUNN, Appellant, v. Kathleen Dionn DUNN, Respondent.
Judges: Before GEORGE W. DRAPER III, P.J., MARY R. RUSSELL, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 81
Pages: 722–723

Head Matter:
Dale Joseph DUNN, Appellant, v. Kathleen Dionn DUNN, Respondent.
No. ED 79957.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Aug. 6, 2002.
Charles P. Todt, Clayton, MO, for Appellant.
Michael A. Turken, Turken & Associates, St. Charles, MO, for Respondent.
Jane Ellen Tomich, Knight & Tomich, St. Charles, MO, Co-Counsel for Respondent.
Before GEORGE W. DRAPER III, P.J., MARY R. RUSSELL, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Dale Joseph Dunn (hereinafter, "Father") appeals the judgment of dissolution awarding Kathleen Dione Dunn (hereinafter, "Mother") custody of the parties' minor children. Father argues the trial court erred when it granted sole custody of the children to Mother in Michigan and awarded excessive child support to Mother.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The judgment is supported by substantial and competent evidence in the record and is not against the weight of the evidence. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).