Case Name: The State, ex rel. The Hall China Co., Appellant, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellee. (Two cases.)
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1964-06-17
Citations: 176 Ohio St. 349
Docket Number: Nos. 38594 and 38595
Parties: The State, ex rel. The Hall China Co., Appellant, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellee. (Two cases.)
Judges: Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, New Service
Volume: 176
Pages: 349–350

Head Matter:
The State, ex rel. The Hall China Co., Appellant, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellee. (Two cases.)
(Nos. 38594 and 38595
Decided June 17, 1964.)
Messrs. Vorys, Safer, Seymour & Pease, Mr. Russell P. Herrold, Jr., Messrs. Squire, Sanders S Dempsey and Mr. William C. Hartman, for appellant.
Mr. William B. Saxbe, attorney general, Mr. Robert M. Duncan and Mr. Robert N. Wistner, for appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The Industrial Commission, a fact-finding administrative agency, has made factual determinations in these causes. This court cannot say, from an examination of the records, that the commission abused its discretion in making such findings. A clear legal right to writs of mandamus has not been established.
The judgments of the Court of Appeals are affirmed.
Judgments affirmed.
Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O'Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur.