Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darian Terrence HARRIS, a/k/a Darion Harris, a/k/a Damien Russell, a/k/a Damion Russell, a/k/a Darren Jackson, a/k/a Russell Damior, a/k/a Michael Jones, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-09-21
Citations: 109 F. App'x 583
Docket Number: No. 03-4889
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Darian Terrence HARRIS, a/k/a Darion Harris, a/k/a Damien Russell, a/k/a Damion Russell, a/k/a Darren Jackson, a/k/a Russell Damior, a/k/a Michael Jones, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before LUTTIG and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 109
Pages: 583–583

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Darian Terrence HARRIS, a/k/a Darion Harris, a/k/a Damien Russell, a/k/a Damion Russell, a/k/a Darren Jackson, a/k/a Russell Damior, a/k/a Michael Jones, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 03-4889.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 27, 2004.
Decided Sept. 21, 2004.
Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, G. Alan DuBois, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Frank D. Whitney, United States Attorney, Christine Witcover Dean, Winnie Jordan Reaves, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before LUTTIG and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Darían Terrence Harris was convicted by a jury for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), 924 (2000). He received a 96-month sentence. On appeal, he challenges his conviction, arguing that the district court erred in not allowing him to pursue testimony from Magistrate Clifton Brummitt that would impeach the testimony of Deputy Wade Woody, a Government witness. This Court reviews a district court's evidentiary rulings for abuse of discretion. United States v. Leftenant, 341 F.3d 338, 342 (4th Cir.2003), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 124 S.Ct. 1183, 157 L.Ed.2d 1215 (2004). Having reviewed the material submitted in the joint appendix, particularly the trial transcript, in light of Harris' argument, we find no abuse of discretion.
Accordingly, we affirm Hams' conviction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED