Case Name: Barry CHAZIN, Appellant v. Marilyn BROOKS; The District Attorney of the County of Philadelphia; The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-04-28
Citations: 523 F.3d 387
Docket Number: No. 07-1068
Parties: Barry CHAZIN, Appellant v. Marilyn BROOKS; The District Attorney of the County of Philadelphia; The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania.
Judges: Before: SLOVITER, JORDAN, and ALARCÓN , Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 523
Pages: 387–387

Head Matter:
Barry CHAZIN, Appellant v. Marilyn BROOKS; The District Attorney of the County of Philadelphia; The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania.
No. 07-1068.
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Argued April 16, 2008.
Opinion Filed April 28, 2008.
Michael J. Kelly, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellant.
Joshua S. Goldwert, Office of District Attorney, Philadelphia, PA, for Marilyn Brooks; The District Attorney of the County of Philadelphia; The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania.
Before: SLOVITER, JORDAN, and ALARCÓN , Circuit Judges.
Honorable Arthur L. Alarcon, Senior Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
JUDGMENT ORDER
DOLORES K. SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.
After consideration of the briefs and oral argument in the above case, the appeal is dismissed because appellant has failed to state a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000).