Case Name: Daniel F. WALSH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-01-19
Citations: 754 So. 2d 742
Docket Number: No. 3D99-2913
Parties: Daniel F. WALSH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before JORGENSON, COPE and LEVY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 754
Pages: 742–742

Head Matter:
Daniel F. WALSH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D99-2913.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan. 19, 2000.
Rehearing Denied March 29, 2000.
Daniel Walsh, in proper person.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Frank J. Ingrassia, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before JORGENSON, COPE and LEVY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Daniel F. Walsh appeals an order denying postconviction relief, in which he claims that he does not qualify as a habitual offender because a North Carolina conviction should not have been counted as a predicate offense. A review of this court's records discloses that this exact claim was rejected by this court in Walsh v. State, 727 So.2d 936 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). This court's earlier ruling is dispositive.
Affirmed.