Case Name: Nathaniel Burt and Thomas M. Locke, Receivers, v. The Real Estate Exchange of Philadelphia, George H. Becker, George W. Carson, Henry Clay, William C. Stoever, Martin H. Stutzbach et al. Martin Stutzbach's Appeal
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1896-05-28
Citations: 175 Pa. 623
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 394
Parties: Nathaniel Burt and Thomas M. Locke, Receivers, v. The Real Estate Exchange of Philadelphia, George H. Becker, George W. Carson, Henry Clay, William C. Stoever, Martin H. Stutzbach et al. Martin Stutzbach’s Appeal.
Judges: Before Steerett, C. J., Green, Williams, McCollum, Mitchell, Dean and Fell, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 175
Pages: 623–623

Head Matter:
Nathaniel Burt and Thomas M. Locke, Receivers, v. The Real Estate Exchange of Philadelphia, George H. Becker, George W. Carson, Henry Clay, William C. Stoever, Martin H. Stutzbach et al. Martin Stutzbach’s Appeal.
May 28, 1896:
Argued Jan. 6, 1896.
Appeal, No. 394, Jan. T., 1894, by Martin H. Stutzbach, from decree of C. P. No. 3, Phila. Co., Dec. T., 1890, No. 353, on bill in equity.
Before Steerett, C. J., Green, Williams, McCollum, Mitchell, Dean and Fell, JJ.
Affirmed.

Opinion:
Opinion by
Mr. Justice McCollum,
It is impossible to distinguish tins case from Stoever's appeal from the same decree, just decided, supra, p. 619. For the reasons stated in the opinion filed in Stoever's appeal the decree is affirmed and the appeal is dismissed at the cost of the appellant.