Case Name: Ruth Louise WILLIAMS and Edward Smith, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Agnes BAMBAUER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1972-02-10
Citations: 455 F.2d 160
Docket Number: No. 71-3043
Parties: Ruth Louise WILLIAMS and Edward Smith, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Agnes BAMBAUER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 455
Pages: 160–160

Head Matter:
Ruth Louise WILLIAMS and Edward Smith, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Agnes BAMBAUER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 71-3043
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Feb. 10, 1972.
Frank S. Thackston, Jr., Frank W. Hunger, Lake, Tindall & Hunger, Green-ville, Miss., for defendant-appellant.
Fountain D. Dawson, Greenville, Miss., Francis S. Bowling, William F. Coleman, Jackson, Miss., for plaintiffs-appellees.
Before BELL, DYER and CLARK, Circuit Judges.
Rule 18, 5 Cir.; See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
This appeal involves judgments rendered after a non-jury trial of two consolidated diversity suits for damages arising out of the same automobile accident. The opinion of the district court contains the findings of fact and conclusions of law and is reported. Williams v. Bambauer, N.D.Miss.1971, 325 F. Supp. 716. The findings of fact are not clearly erroneous, nor does any error in law appear. The judgments are therefore due to be and they are
Affirmed.