Case Name: PLUM CREEK MARKETING, INC. ("PCM"), Plum Creek Timber Company, Inc. ("PCT"), Plum Creek Timberlands, L.P., ("PC Timberlands"), Thomas Reed ("Reed"), Jon Rashleigh ("Rashleigh") and Ben Dow ("Dow"), Appellants, v. WILLISTON TIMBER COMPANY, INC., Williston Trucking Company, LC, Pineearth Forestry, Inc. and Derby Gold Pine Shavings Company, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2013-10-11
Citations: 122 So. 3d 995
Docket Number: No. 1D13-3920
Parties: PLUM CREEK MARKETING, INC. ("PCM"), Plum Creek Timber Company, Inc. ("PCT"), Plum Creek Timberlands, L.P., ("PC Timberlands"), Thomas Reed ("Reed"), Jon Rashleigh ("Rashleigh") and Ben Dow ("Dow"), Appellants, v. WILLISTON TIMBER COMPANY, INC., Williston Trucking Company, LC, Pineearth Forestry, Inc. and Derby Gold Pine Shavings Company, Appellees.
Judges: ROBERTS and SWANSON, JJ., concur;
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 122
Pages: 995–996

Head Matter:
PLUM CREEK MARKETING, INC. ("PCM"), Plum Creek Timber Company, Inc. ("PCT"), Plum Creek Timberlands, L.P., ("PC Timberlands"), Thomas Reed ("Reed"), Jon Rashleigh ("Rashleigh") and Ben Dow ("Dow"), Appellants, v. WILLISTON TIMBER COMPANY, INC., Williston Trucking Company, LC, Pineearth Forestry, Inc. and Derby Gold Pine Shavings Company, Appellees.
No. 1D13-3920.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Oct. 11, 2013.
Christopher J. Greene and Joseph D. Pickles, of Purcell, Flanagan, Hay <& Greene, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellants.
Mike Piscitelli, of Vezina, Lawrence & Piscitelli, Fort Lauderdale, for Appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM..
Upon consideration of appellants' response to the Court's order of August 29, 2013, the Court has determined that the order on appeal is not within the scope of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(C)(iv). See Westwood One, Inc. v. Flight Express, Inc., 940 So.2d 1241, 1243 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (holding that order striking motion to compel arbitration on procedural grounds was not an appeal-able order). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
ROBERTS and SWANSON, JJ., concur;
MAKAR, J., concurs with written opinion.