Case Name: Chauncey Baum, Respondent, v. Stewart-Kerbaugh-Shanley Company, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1914-06-02
Citations: 211 N.Y. 581
Docket Number: 
Parties: Chauncey Baum, Respondent, v. Stewart-Kerbaugh-Shanley Company, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 211
Pages: 581–581

Head Matter:
Chauncey Baum, Respondent, v. Stewart-Kerbaugh-Shanley Company, Appellant.
Baum, v. Stewart-Kerbaugh-Shanley Co., 152 App. Div. 952 affirmed.
(Argued May 12, 1914;
decided June 2, 1914)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered November 4, 1912, modifying and affirming as modified a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover damages to plaintiff’s land and crops alleged to have been occasioned by operations of defendant while engaged in the performance of a contract for public work.
Paul Shipman Andrews for appellant.
George H. Sears and Willis J. Spicer for respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Willard Bartlett, Oh. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan, Miller and Oardozo, JJ.