Case Name: James JONES; Sharon Jones, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF FREDERICK, Maryland; Loumis Gene Alston; Diana Marie Kimmel; Debbie Shankie; James Hiram Kippe, Jr., Defendants-Appellees, and Frederick County, Maryland; State of Maryland; Scott L. Rolle; Charles J. Smith; Frederick City Police Department, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-11-24
Citations: 301 F. App'x 291
Docket Number: No. 08-1855
Parties: James JONES; Sharon Jones, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF FREDERICK, Maryland; Loumis Gene Alston; Diana Marie Kimmel; Debbie Shankie; James Hiram Kippe, Jr., Defendants-Appellees, and Frederick County, Maryland; State of Maryland; Scott L. Rolle; Charles J. Smith; Frederick City Police Department, Defendants.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 301
Pages: 291–292

Head Matter:
James JONES; Sharon Jones, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF FREDERICK, Maryland; Loumis Gene Alston; Diana Marie Kimmel; Debbie Shankie; James Hiram Kippe, Jr., Defendants-Appellees, and Frederick County, Maryland; State of Maryland; Scott L. Rolle; Charles J. Smith; Frederick City Police Department, Defendants.
No. 08-1855.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 5, 2008.
Decided: Nov. 24, 2008.
Patrick Joseph Christmas, Stephen M. Gensemer, Justin Gregory Nunzio, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Appellants. David Bruce Stratton, Jordan Coyne & Savits, Washington, D.C.; Kirsten E. Keating, Ballard, Spahr, Andrews & Ingersoll, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Debbie Shankie, James Hiram Kippe, Jr., Appellees Pro Se.
Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
James and Sharon Jones appeal a district court order granting summary judgment to the City of Frederick and Loumis Gene Alston and dismissing their civil rights complaint concerning James Jones' mistaken arrest for a crime and dismissing their state law claims arising from the same incident. We have reviewed the record and the district court's memorandum opinion and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See Jones v. City of Frederick, Md., No. l:07-cv-03010-AMD, 2008 WL 2509411 (D.Md. June 19, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.