Case Name: Stephanie Davis AMBUSH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF FREDERICK, A Body Corporate and Politic; Randy McClement, Mayor, Frederick City Government, Individually and in his Official Capacity; Richard B. Weldon, Jr., Individually and in his Official Capacity; Kathryn Nicolato, Individually and in her Official Capacity, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-09-26
Citations: 447 F. App'x 481
Docket Number: No. 11-1192
Parties: Stephanie Davis AMBUSH, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. CITY OF FREDERICK, A Body Corporate and Politic; Randy McClement, Mayor, Frederick City Government, Individually and in his Official Capacity; Richard B. Weldon, Jr., Individually and in his Official Capacity; Kathryn Nicolato, Individually and in her Official Capacity, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 447
Pages: 481–482

Head Matter:
Stephanie Davis AMBUSH, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. CITY OF FREDERICK, A Body Corporate and Politic; Randy McClement, Mayor, Frederick City Government, Individually and in his Official Capacity; Richard B. Weldon, Jr., Individually and in his Official Capacity; Kathryn Nicolato, Individually and in her Official Capacity, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 11-1192.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 12, 2011.
Decided: Sept. 26, 2011.
Willie J. Mahone, Frederick, Maryland, for Appellant. Kevin M. Kraham, Erik C. Johnson, Littler Mendelson P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Stephanie Davis Ambush appeals the district court's orders dismissing her various state and Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment procedural and substantive due process claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. See Ambush v. City of Frederick, No. 1:10-cv-01953-WDQ, 2011 WL 232031 (D.Md. Jan. 24, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.