Case Name: In the Matter of the Application of The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, Relative to Acquiring Title, etc., to East One Hundred and Sixty-first Street, etc., from Elton Avenue to Mott Avenue, in the Twenty-third Ward of the City of New York, etc. The City of New York, Appellant; The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1909-12
Citations: 135 A.D. 912
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Application of The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, Relative to Acquiring Title, etc., to East One Hundred and Sixty-first Street, etc., from Elton Avenue to Mott Avenue, in the Twenty-third Ward of the City of New York, etc. The City of New York, Appellant; The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 135
Pages: 912–913

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Application of The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, Relative to Acquiring Title, etc., to East One Hundred and Sixty-first Street, etc., from Elton Avenue to Mott Avenue, in the Twenty-third Ward of the City of New York, etc. The City of New York, Appellant; The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Respondent.
Eminent domain-—property sulyeol to approbation— New York city—railroad lands.
Appeal from a judgment entered on the 23d day of October, 1907, upon the decision of the Special Term dismissing the proceeding so far as it attempts to acquire certain property of the New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company in this proceeding. Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the opinion of the court below. (Reported in 52 Mise. Rep. 596.)

Opinion:
Present —Ingraham, McLaughlin, Laughlin, Houghton and Scott, JJ. (Ingraham and Scott, JJ., dissented).