Case Name: Steven C. NAUGLE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1987-07-02
Citations: 511 So. 2d 282
Docket Number: No. 69734
Parties: Steven C. NAUGLE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: McDonald, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 511
Pages: 282–282

Head Matter:
Steven C. NAUGLE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 69734.
Supreme Court of Florida.
July 2, 1987.
Rehearing Denied Sept. 9, 1987.
Steven C. Naugle, in pro per.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Candance M. Sunderland, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for respondent.

Opinion:
EHRLICH, Justice.
We have for review Naugle v. State, 497 So.2d 664, 665 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986) in which the Second District Court of Appeal certified the following question:
DOES FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.191(b)(1) APPLY TO PERSONS HELD IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS SOLELY ON THE BASIS OF CHARGES PENDING IN THIS STATE?
We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.
Consistent with our recent decision in State v. Bivona, 496 So.2d 130 (Fla.1986), the district court below concluded that Rule 3.191(b)(1) does so apply. Accordingly, the decision below is approved.
It is so ordered.
McDonald, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.