Case Name: David T. CLENNEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer V.R. SWARTZ, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-10-22
Citations: 620 F. App'x 206
Docket Number: No. 15-1535
Parties: David T. CLENNEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer V.R. SWARTZ, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 620
Pages: 206–206

Head Matter:
David T. CLENNEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer V.R. SWARTZ, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 15-1535.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 20, 2015.
Decided: Oct. 22, 2015.
David T. Clenney, Appellant Pro Se. Karen L. Gibbons, Jamie Marie Greenz-weig, David Isaac Klass, Fairfax County Attorney’s Office, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
David T. Clenney appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Clenney v. Swartz, No. 1:14-cv-01702-GBL-MSN (E.D.Va. Apr. 24, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.