Case Name: David Floyd, Plaintiff in Error, v. State of Florida, Defendant in Error
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1930-11-26
Citations: 100 Fla. 1368
Docket Number: 
Parties: David Floyd, Plaintiff in Error, v. State of Florida, Defendant in Error.
Judges: Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 100
Pages: 1368–1369

Head Matter:
David Floyd, Plaintiff in Error, v. State of Florida, Defendant in Error.
En Banc.
Opinion filed November 26, 1930.
J. McHenry Jones, for Plaintiff in Error;
Fred H. Davis, Attorney General, and Boy Campbell, Assistant', for Defendant in Error.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.—David
Floyd was tried and convicted for breaking and entering a building with intent' to commit a misdemeanor and petty larceny. He was sentenced to a term of three years in the state penitentiary and seeks reversal on writ of error.
The sole question relied on for reversal is the. sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict and judgment. The evidence has been examined and while it is contradictory in the extreme, there is ample positive evidence to support the verdict and it is not made to appear that the jury were influenced by considerations outside the evidence. The facts do not bring this case within the rule announced in Troop v. State, 98 Fla. 385, 123 So. R. 811, 813 or Fuller v. State, 92 Fla. 873, 110 So. R. 528.
Affirmed.
Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.