Case Name: VERRET ET AL. vs. CLAVE
Court: Louisiana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1841-04
Citations: 18 La. 36
Docket Number: 
Parties: VERRET ET AL. vs. CLAVE.
Judges: 
Reporter: Louisiana Reports
Volume: 18
Pages: 36–37

Head Matter:
VERRET ET AL. vs. CLAVE.
APPEAL PROM THE CITT COURT OP HEW ORLEAHS,
Appeal solely for delay, and judgment affirmed with the maximum of damage?. •
This is an action against the maker of a promissory note, to which there was no defence.
Final judgment was rendered on the plaintiff’s showing. The defendant appealed.
Qrandmont, for the plaintiff.
Preau, contra.

Opinion:
Garland, J.
delivered the opinion of the court.
This is a suit on a promissory note ; the defendant permitted a judgment by default to be taken and made final, and took an appeal. He has not stated any reason why the judgment should he reversed, we therefore consider it as an appeal .taken solely for delay; and order, and decree, that the judgment of the court he affirmed with costs, and ten per cent, .damages.