Case Name: ANDREW MUDRI, RESPONDENT, v. UNITED ENGINEERS AND CONSTRUCTORS, INCORPORATED, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1933-12-07
Citations: 112 N.J.L. 17
Docket Number: 
Parties: ANDREW MUDRI, RESPONDENT, v. UNITED ENGINEERS AND CONSTRUCTORS, INCORPORATED, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 112
Pages: 17–17

Head Matter:
ANDREW MUDRI, RESPONDENT, v. UNITED ENGINEERS AND CONSTRUCTORS, INCORPORATED, APPELLANT.
Submitted October 13, 1933
Decided December 7, 1933.
For the appellant, Henry H. Fryling.
For the respondent, Joseph F. A. Bubacky.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion filed in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Case, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Yan Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.