Case Name: Zahid CHOUDHRY and Zakia Choudhry, his wife, Appellants, v. U-HAUL, CO. OF FLORIDA; Latasha Martin and Cedric Maultsby, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2005-10-11
Citations: 911 So. 2d 1287
Docket Number: Nos. 1D04-3573, 1D04-5009
Parties: Zahid CHOUDHRY and Zakia Choudhry, his wife, Appellants, v. U-HAUL, CO. OF FLORIDA; Latasha Martin and Cedric Maultsby, Appellees.
Judges: BENTON, VAN NORTWICK and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 911
Pages: 1287–1287

Head Matter:
Zahid CHOUDHRY and Zakia Choudhry, his wife, Appellants, v. U-HAUL, CO. OF FLORIDA; Latasha Martin and Cedric Maultsby, Appellees.
Nos. 1D04-3573, 1D04-5009.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Oct. 11, 2005.
Carl Scott Schuler and Brian J. Lee of the Law Offices of Carl Scott Schuler, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellants.
Edward McCarthy, III and Robert E. Pinder of Rogers Towers, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Zahid Choudhry and his wife, Zakia Choudhry, appeal two final orders, one granting summary judgment for the defendant, U-Haul Company of Florida, and the other granting summary judgment for the defendants, Latasha Martin and Cedric Maultsby. We reject the defendants' argument that the injury in this case was too remote to support an action based on a claim of negligence. Because the issue of forseeability, as it relates to causation, involved a factual question for the jury, the defendants were not entitled to judgments as a matter of law.
Reversed.
BENTON, VAN NORTWICK and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.