Case Name: SOUTH ALABAMA MEDICAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION, Appellant v. GNOSIS S.P.A., Gnosis Bioresearch S.A., Gnosis U.S.A., Inc., Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-04-26
Citations: 818 F.3d 1380
Docket Number: Nos. 2014-1778, 2014-1780, 2014-1781
Parties: SOUTH ALABAMA MEDICAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION, Appellant v. GNOSIS S.P.A., Gnosis Bioresearch S.A., Gnosis U.S.A., Inc., Appellees.
Judges: Before PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, LOURIE, DYK, MOORE, O’MALLEY, REYNA, WALLACH, TARANTO, CHEN, HUGHES, and STOLL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 818
Pages: 1380–1382

Head Matter:
SOUTH ALABAMA MEDICAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION, Appellant v. GNOSIS S.P.A., Gnosis Bioresearch S.A., Gnosis U.S.A., Inc., Appellees.
Nos. 2014-1778, 2014-1780, 2014-1781.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
April 26, 2016.
Thomas J. Parker, Alston & Bird LLP, New York, NY, for appellant. Also represented by Deepro Mukerjee, Yi Wen Wu; Jitendra Malik, Durham, NC; Kirk T. Bradley, Charlotte, NC; Peter Rogalskyj, Law Office of Peter Rogalskyj,. Livonia, NY.
Joseph Cwik, Amin Talati & Upadhye, LLC, Chicago, IL, for appellees. Also represented by Jonathan Jacob Krit.
Before PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, LOURIE, DYK, MOORE, O’MALLEY, REYNA, WALLACH, TARANTO, CHEN, HUGHES, and STOLL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
O'MALLEY, Circuit Judge, with whom WALLACH and STOLL, Circuit Judges, join, concur in the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge, dissents from the denial of the' petition for rehearing en banc.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant South-Alabama Medical Science Foundatioii filed a petition for rehearing en 'banc. A response to' the petition was invited by the court and filed by the appellees Gnosis S.p.A., Gnosis Biore-search S.A., and Gnosis U.S.A:, Inc. -
The petition was referred to the1 panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition and response were referred to the circuit judges who are in' regular active service. A poll was reguested, taken, and failed.
Upon consideration thereof,
It Is Ordered That:
The petition' for rehearing en banc is' denied.
The mandate of the court will issue on May 3, 2016.