Case Name: Christopher ELDERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-10-09
Citations: 381 S.W.3d 382
Docket Number: No. ED 97534
Parties: Christopher ELDERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., PATRICIA L. COHEN, J., and KURT S. ODENWALD, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 381
Pages: 382–383

Head Matter:
Christopher ELDERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 97534.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Oct. 9, 2012.
Gwenda R. Robinson, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Dora A. Fichter, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., PATRICIA L. COHEN, J., and KURT S. ODENWALD, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Christopher Elders (Movant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant claims that the motion court clearly erred in denying his claim that plea counsel provided ineffective assistance by coercing him to plead guilty.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court's decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).