Case Name: Luis Alfredo LUCIANO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2008-06-13
Citations: 983 So. 2d 759
Docket Number: No. 5D07-601
Parties: Luis Alfredo LUCIANO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: LAWSON and COHEN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 983
Pages: 759–760

Head Matter:
Luis Alfredo LUCIANO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D07-601.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
June 13, 2008.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Marvin F. Clegg, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Brigid E. Collins, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Ap-pellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant raises three points on appeal, only two of which merit discussion. Appellant challenges his convictions for shooting from a vehicle and shooting into an occupied vehicle on double jeopardy grounds. The State concedes that our panel decision in Lopez-Vazquez v. State, 931 So.2d 231 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006), compels reversal, although the State urges that we recede from this precedent. The State also concedes Appellant's second point — the lack of evidentiary support for the award of investigative costs.
Accordingly, we remand this cause with instructions that the trial court vacate one of the shooting convictions and the award of investigative costs. Upon remand, the trial court may re-impose such costs upon appropriate motion and proof.
We certify conflict with Valdes v. State, 970 So.2d 414 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007), rev. granted, 975 So.2d 430, 2008 WL 599838 (Fla.2008).
AFFIRMED IN PART AND REMANDED; CONFLICT CERTIFIED.
LAWSON and COHEN, JJ., concur.
TORPY, J., concurs and concurs specially with opinion.
. § 790.15(2), Fla. Stat. (2006).
. § 790.19, Fla. Stat. (2006).