Case Name: Michael HOOEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. William BROWN, Community Center Manager, Bureau of Prisons, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-05-07
Citations: 277 F. App'x 717
Docket Number: No. 07-35667
Parties: Michael HOOEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. William BROWN, Community Center Manager, Bureau of Prisons, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 277
Pages: 717–718

Head Matter:
Michael HOOEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. William BROWN, Community Center Manager, Bureau of Prisons, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 07-35667.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 5, 2008.
Filed May 7, 2008.
Stephen R. Sady, Esq., FPDOR — Federal Public Defender’s Office, Portland, OR, for Petitioner-Appellant.
Scott Erik Asphaug, United States Attorney’s Office, Portland, OR, for Respondent-Appellee.
Before: TALLMAN, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this ease suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Michael Hooey appeals the district court's denial of his federal habeas corpus petition. We dismiss the petition as moot.
At the time Hooey filed his petition, he was confined to the Jackson County Transition Center ("JCTC") in Phoenix, Oregon. In his petition, he asks that the Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") allow him to serve the remainder of his sentence in home confinement. The petition also demands that the BOP provide him with medical treatment for his leukemia.
The passage of time has provided Hooey with everything he seeks in his petition. After he filed his petition, the BOP guaranteed him the medical care he was seeking. On August 30, 2007, he completed his term of confinement at JCTC and is now on supervised release living at home. His petition is therefore moot. See In re Bur-rell, 415 F.3d 994, 998 (9th Cir.2005) (holding that a court cannot grant any effectual relief and an appeal is moot where a plain tiff has already received all the relief he sought).
DISMISSED AS MOOT.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.