Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Brian Robert GILL, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-07-15
Citations: 583 F. App'x 653
Docket Number: No. 13-80210
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Brian Robert GILL, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: ALARCÓN, KLEINFELD, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 583
Pages: 653–653

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Brian Robert GILL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-80210.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 9, 2014.
Filed July 15, 2014.
Helen J. Brunner, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Thomas Merton Woods, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Corey Endo, FPDWA-Federal Public Defender’s Office, Seattle, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: ALARCÓN, KLEINFELD, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Brian Gill appeals the district court's order continuing the terms of his supervised release without modification. We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3742 and 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.
Gill challenges a condition of his supervised release that requires him to abide by all rules and lifestyle restrictions imposed by his therapist as part of his sexual-deviancy treatment program. He argues, as he did below, that this condition imper-missibly delegates the district court's judicial authority to Gill's therapist.
Gill, however, raised this challenge for the first time in a memorandum asking the district court to modify the conditions of his supervised release. Congress has "limited the manner in which a defendant may challenge the legality of a supervised release condition to: (1) direct appeal, (2) § 2255 habeas corpus relief, and (3) . [a] Rule 35(c) motion." United States v. Gross, 307 F.3d 1043, 1044 (9th Cir.2002).
A district court may not modify the conditions of a defendant's supervised release based on the defendant's claim that a certain condition is illegal. Id. Accordingly, the district court did not err in ordering Gill's supervised release to continue without modification.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.