Case Name: James HURST, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2010-12-28
Citations: 327 S.W.3d 634
Docket Number: No. WD 70904
Parties: James HURST, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Division Three: JAMES M. SMART, JR., P.J., JOSEPH M. ELLIS, and GARY D. WITT, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 327
Pages: 634–635

Head Matter:
James HURST, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 70904.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Dec. 28, 2010.
Laura Grether Martin, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before Division Three: JAMES M. SMART, JR., P.J., JOSEPH M. ELLIS, and GARY D. WITT, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
James E. Hurst appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing in which he sought to vacate his convictions on two counts of criminal non-support. He claims that the motion court clearly erred in denying his claims that his guilty plea was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent, and that he was denied effective assistance of counsel by the public defender's office. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).