Case Name: IN the INTEREST OF: A.L. and R.Y.; Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. T.A.L., Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2017-03-28
Citations: 514 S.W.3d 90
Docket Number: WD 80058
Parties: IN the INTEREST OF: A.L. and R.Y.; Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. T.A.L., Appellant.
Judges: Before Division Two: Cynthia L. Martin, Presiding Judge, Lisa White Hardwick, Judge and Alok Ahuja, Judge
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 514
Pages: 90–90

Head Matter:
IN the INTEREST OF: A.L. and R.Y.; Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. T.A.L., Appellant.
WD 80058
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
ORDER FILED: March 28, 2017
Lori A. Fluegel and A. Renae Adamson, Kansas City, MO, for respondent.
Kelle C. Burmeister Gilmore, Independence, MO, for appellant.
Before Division Two: Cynthia L. Martin, Presiding Judge, Lisa White Hardwick, Judge and Alok Ahuja, Judge

Opinion:
ORDER
Per curiam:
T.A.L. appeals from a judgment terminating her parental rights over her children, A.L. and R.Y. Mother argues that the trial court's findings were not supported by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence. Mother also contends that the trial court abused its discretion in finding that termination of parental rights was in the children's best interests. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).