Case Name: GREAT WEST CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, an Oregon corporation, Appellant, v. MARTIN CORPORATION, an Oregon corporation, Michael L. Martin, Jinny R. Martin And Aquatic Designs, Inc., an Oregon corporation, Respondents; MARTIN CORPORATION, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. JACKSON SCHOOL VILLAGE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Third-Party Defendant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2001-02-21
Citations: 172 Or. App. 490
Docket Number: 9607-05717; CA A100353
Parties: GREAT WEST CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, an Oregon corporation, Appellant, v. MARTIN CORPORATION, an Oregon corporation, Michael L. Martin, Jinny R. Martin And Aquatic Designs, Inc., an Oregon corporation, Respondents. MARTIN CORPORATION, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. JACKSON SCHOOL VILLAGE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Third-Party Defendant.
Judges: Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Linder and Brewer, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 172
Pages: 490–493

Head Matter:
On appellant’s petition for reconsideration filed November 14, and respondents’ response to petition for reconsideration filed December 5, 2000,
reconsideration allowed and disposition (170 Or App 616, 13 P3d 1016) withdrawn; reversed and remanded for entry of judgment in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $58,775.66 and for further proceedings on remaining equitable claims February 21, 2001
GREAT WEST CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, an Oregon corporation, Appellant, v. MARTIN CORPORATION, an Oregon corporation, Michael L. Martin, Jinny R. Martin And Aquatic Designs, Inc., an Oregon corporation, Respondents. MARTIN CORPORATION, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. JACKSON SCHOOL VILLAGE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Third-Party Defendant.
(9607-05717; CA A100353)
19 P3d 954
M. Elizabeth Duncan and Greene & Markley, P.C., for petition.
G. Kenneth Shiroishi, Brenda K. Baumgart, and Dunn Carney Allen Higgins & Tongue, contra.
Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Linder and Brewer, Judges.
LANDAU, P. J.

Opinion:
LANDAU, P. J.
Plaintiff petitions for reconsideration of our opinion, Great West Construction Co. v. Martin Corp., 170 Or App 616, 13 P3d 1016 (2000), in which we reversed judgment of the trial court and remanded the case for entry of judgment in favor of plaintiff on its breach of contract claim. Plaintiff seeks clarification of the effect of our opinion on unresolved equitable claims against other defendants. Plaintiff points out that, in its briefing on appeal, it did ask this court to reverse on the contract claim and to remand for further proceedings on the equitable claims that essentially had been rendered moot by the trial court's disposition of the contract claim. Plaintiff is correct.
Reconsideration allowed and disposition withdrawn; reversed and remanded for entry of judgment in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $58,775.66 and for further proceedings on remaining equitable claims.