Case Name: In re Maloney
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2002-08-16
Citations: 96 Ohio St. 3d 307
Docket Number: No. 2001-1726
Parties: In re Maloney.
Judges: Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 96
Pages: 307–307

Head Matter:
In re Maloney.
[Cite as In re Maloney, 96 Ohio St.3d 307, 2002-0hio-4214.]
(No. 2001-1726
Submitted and decided August 16, 2002.)
Scott E. Knox, for appellant Richard Clark Maloney.
Jillian S. Davis and Raymond V. Vasvari, Jr., for amicus curiae American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio Foundation, in support of appellant.
Heather C. Sawyer and Susan J. Becker, for amici curiae Ohio Psychological Association, National Association of Social Workers and its Ohio Chapter, American Public Health Association, American Counseling Association, Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc., and Ohio Human Rights Bar Association, in support of appellant.
David R. Langdon, urging affirmance for amicus curiae American Family Association of Ohio.

Opinion:
{¶ 1} Oral argument is cancelled.
{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of In re Bicknell, 96 Ohio St.3d 76, 2002-0hio-3615, 771 N.E.2d 846.
Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Moyer, C.J., and Cook, J., would order the parties to show cause why this cause should not be decided on the authority of In re Bicknell.
Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.