Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Shannon SMITH, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-01-02
Citations: 34 S.W.3d 859
Docket Number: No. ED 77018
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Shannon SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOONEY, P.J., SIMON and SULLIVAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 34
Pages: 859–860

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Shannon SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.
No. ED 77018.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Jan. 2, 2001.
Nancy L. Vincent, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before MOONEY, P.J., SIMON and SULLIVAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Shannon Smith ("Defendant") appeals from a judgment of conviction for first-degree assault, class B felony, Section 565.050 RSMo (1994), and for felonious restraint, Section 565.120, for which Defendant was sentenced to two concurrent terms of seven years. Defendant alleges the trial court erred in denying her motion for judgment of acquittal because the State did not present sufficient evidence to support either conviction. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude there is sufficient evidence from which a reasonable trier of fact might have found Defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Shinn, 921 S.W.2d 70, 72-73 (Mo.App. E.D.1996). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).
. All statutory references are to RSMo (1994) unless otherwise specified.