Case Name: Hunter LEVI, Appellant, v. AEROTEK, INC., Defendant, Division of Employment Security, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-09-19
Citations: 204 S.W.3d 667
Docket Number: No. WD 66743
Parties: Hunter LEVI, Appellant, v. AEROTEK, INC., Defendant, Division of Employment Security, Respondent.
Judges: Before JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Presiding Judge, ROBERT G. ULRICH, Judge and RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 204
Pages: 667–668

Head Matter:
Hunter LEVI, Appellant, v. AEROTEK, INC., Defendant, Division of Employment Security, Respondent.
No. WD 66743.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Sept. 19, 2006.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 31, 2006.
Hunter Levi, Overland Park, KS, pro se.
Marilyn Green, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Presiding Judge, ROBERT G. ULRICH, Judge and RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Hunter Levi appeals from an order issued by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying his application for unemployment benefits pursuant to § 288.050 based upon a finding that he left his employment with Aerotek, Inc. voluntarily and without good cause attributable to his work or his employer. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the Commission s order is supported by sufficient competent evidence in the record, that the Commission acted within its powers, that the decision was not procured by fraud, and that the facts found by the Commission support the award. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).