Case Name: Emma Ana CABRERA-VALADEZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-03-16
Citations: 224 F. App'x 668
Docket Number: No. 06-73317
Parties: Emma Ana CABRERA-VALADEZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: CANBY, TROTT and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 224
Pages: 668–668

Head Matter:
Emma Ana CABRERA-VALADEZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 06-73317.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 12, 2007 .
Filed March 16, 2007.
Theodore A. Mahr, Esq., Moses Lake, WA, for Petitioner.
Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, San Francisco, CA, Immigration and Naturalization Service Office of the District Counsel, Seattle, WA, OIL, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: CANBY, TROTT and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Emma Ana Cabrera-Valadez petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") decision finding her removable under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(C)(ii) for falsely representing herself as a citizen of the United States.
Petitioner was ordered to show cause why the petition for review should not be summarily denied. In her response, petitioner admits that she falsely represented herself to being a United States citizen, as she admitted before the BIA, but asserts that she should be eligible for a waiver. The charge of inadmissibility under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(C)(ii), however, is not waivable. See Pichardo v. INS, 216 F.3d 1198, 1201 (9th Cir.2000). Accordingly, the petition for review is denied.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.