Case Name: Martin S. YATES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2003-02-07
Citations: 836 So. 2d 1096
Docket Number: No. 5D02-1313
Parties: Martin S. YATES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: PLEUS and PALMER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 836
Pages: 1096–1097

Head Matter:
Martin S. YATES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D02-1313.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Feb. 7, 2003.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Marvin F. Clegg, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Charlie J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Ap-pellee.

Opinion:
HARRIS, C., Senior Judge,
Appellant argues, and the State concedes, that there is a conflict between the oral sentencing and the judgment of sentence. The cause is remanded to the trial court to correct the judgment.
REVERSED and REMANDED for correction.
PLEUS and PALMER, JJ., concur.