Case Name: Revelle LOVING, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Thomas ROY; Kent Grandlienard; David Reishus; Lcie Stevenson; Michael Green; Charles Tobritzhofer; Bradley Gross; Rodney Rivard; Graham Besonen; Nick Ploussard; Aaron Johnson; Micsone Klin; Zackery Nuehring, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-07-25
Citations: 573 F. App'x 607
Docket Number: No. 13-3552
Parties: Revelle LOVING, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Thomas ROY; Kent Grandlienard; David Reishus; Lcie Stevenson; Michael Green; Charles Tobritzhofer; Bradley Gross; Rodney Rivard; Graham Besonen; Nick Ploussard; Aaron Johnson; Micsone Klin; Zackery Nuehring, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before BYE, SMITH, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 573
Pages: 607–608

Head Matter:
Revelle LOVING, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Thomas ROY; Kent Grandlienard; David Reishus; Lcie Stevenson; Michael Green; Charles Tobritzhofer; Bradley Gross; Rodney Rivard; Graham Besonen; Nick Ploussard; Aaron Johnson; Micsone Klin; Zackery Nuehring, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 13-3552.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: July 22, 2014.
Filed: July 25, 2014.
Revelle Loving, Stillwater, MN, pro se.
Jackson Evans, Assistant Attorney General, Attorney General’s Office, Saint Paul, MN, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before BYE, SMITH, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Inmate Revelle Loving appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon de novo review, see Mason v. Corr. Med. Servs., Inc., 559 F.3d 880, 884-85 (8th Cir.2009), we find no basis for reversing the district court's well-reasoned decision, and Loving has offered none. The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Susan Richard Nelson, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Leo I. Brisbois, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
. We decline to consider the new material Loving offers on appeal. See Maxa v. John Alien Life Ins. Co., 972 F.2d 980, 983 (8th Cir.1992).