Case Name: FREELANCE ENTERTAINMENT, LLC; J.B. Hunt; Pamela Rushing, Individually, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Harry SANDERS; J.L. Williams, Tommy Southerland; Joe Brooks; Leroy Brooks, In their Official Capacities as members of the Board of Supervisors of Lowndes County, Mississippi, C.B. "Butch Howard", In his Official Capacity as Sheriff of Lowndes County, Mississippi, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-10-25
Citations: 111 F. App'x 343
Docket Number: No. 04-60282
Parties: FREELANCE ENTERTAINMENT, LLC; J.B. Hunt; Pamela Rushing, Individually, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Harry SANDERS; J.L. Williams, Tommy Southerland; Joe Brooks; Leroy Brooks, In their Official Capacities as members of the Board of Supervisors of Lowndes County, Mississippi, C.B. “Butch Howard”, In his Official Capacity as Sheriff of Lowndes County, Mississippi, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 111
Pages: 343–343

Head Matter:
FREELANCE ENTERTAINMENT, LLC; J.B. Hunt; Pamela Rushing, Individually, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Harry SANDERS; J.L. Williams, Tommy Southerland; Joe Brooks; Leroy Brooks, In their Official Capacities as members of the Board of Supervisors of Lowndes County, Mississippi, C.B. “Butch Howard”, In his Official Capacity as Sheriff of Lowndes County, Mississippi, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 04-60282.
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Decided Oct. 25, 2004.
Michael Francis Pleasants, Pleasants Law Firm, Memphis, TN, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Timothy Cecil Hudson, Sims & Sims, Allison Pritchard Kizer, Columbus, MS, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before REAVLEY, WIENER and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The district court correctly determined that the motion for attorney's fees was untimely. See Romaguera v. Gegenheimer, 162 F.3d 893 (5th Cir.1998). Thus, the judgment is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.