Case Name: 1995 Birchall Avenue LLC, Appellant, v. Lekhram Boodhoo et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2015-05-14
Citations: 128 A.D.3d 504
Docket Number: 
Parties: 1995 Birchall Avenue LLC, Appellant, v Lekhram Boodhoo et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 128
Pages: 504–504

Head Matter:
1995 Birchall Avenue LLC, Appellant, v Lekhram Boodhoo et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.
[7 NYS3d 897]

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth L. Thompson, Jr., J.), entered on or about August 14, 2014, which, inter alia, denied plaintiffs motion seeking the appointment of a temporary receiver, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court properly denied plaintiffs motion for the appointment of a temporary receiver pursuant to CPLR 6401. Plaintiff failed to make a clear evidentiary showing warranting the drastic remedy of appointment of a receiver (see Moran v Moran, 77 AD3d 443, 445 [1st Dept 2010]). Plaintiffs argument that it was it was not required to make the showing of necessity mandated by CPLR 6401 (a) because the mortgage should be construed under Real Property Law § 254 (10) to authorize the appointment of a receiver, was not properly raised below (see Dannasch v Bifulco, 184 AD2d 415, 417 [1st Dept 1992]). Concur — Friedman, J.P., Saxe, Richter and ManzanetDaniels, JJ.