Case Name: James STEADMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CRYSTAL GATEWAY MARRIOTT, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-05-20
Citations: 63 F. App'x 152
Docket Number: No. 02-2447
Parties: James STEADMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CRYSTAL GATEWAY MARRIOTT, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 63
Pages: 152–152

Head Matter:
James STEADMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CRYSTAL GATEWAY MARRIOTT, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 02-2447.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 15, 2003.
Decided May 20, 2003.
James Steadman, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Bredehoft, Venable, Baetjer & Howard, Vienna, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
PER CURIAM.
James Steadman appeals the district court's order granting Crystal Gateway Marriott's motion to dismiss and dismissing Steadman's complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Steadman v. Crystal Gateway Marriott, No. CA-02-1230-A (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 15, 2002; entered Nov. 20, 2002). We deny Steadman's motion titled "motion for rehearing" requesting permission to file additional briefs and for oral argument. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.