Case Name: Karen R. HENDERSON, Respondent, v. Russell B. MARTIN, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-09-04
Citations: 53 S.W.3d 621
Docket Number: No. WD 58638
Parties: Karen R. HENDERSON, Respondent, v. Russell B. MARTIN, Appellant.
Judges: Before THOMAS H. NEWTON, P.J., HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, and JAMES M. SMART, JR., JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 53
Pages: 621–621

Head Matter:
Karen R. HENDERSON, Respondent, v. Russell B. MARTIN, Appellant.
No. WD 58638.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Submitted July 10, 2001.
Decided Sept. 4, 2001.
Karen R. Henderson, pro se.
James C. Thompson, Richmond, MO, for Respondent.
Before THOMAS H. NEWTON, P.J., HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, and JAMES M. SMART, JR., JJ.

Opinion:
Order
PER CURIAM:
Russell B. Martin appeals the judgment in his dissolution case, contending the trial court erred in denying his motion for writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum, denying his motion for attorney's fees pendente lite, failing to timely rule on his motions, and failing to recuse himself.
Having considered the arguments, and finding that Martin has demonstrated no basis for granting relief, we affirm the judgment by summary order. A formal opinion would have no jurisprudential value. A memorandum is furnished to the parties explaining the basis of our decision. Judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).