Case Name: Tommie Jake WILLIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1994-07-29
Citations: 640 So. 2d 1188
Docket Number: No. 93-1970
Parties: Tommie Jake WILLIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: DAUKSCH, PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 640
Pages: 1188–1188

Head Matter:
Tommie Jake WILLIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 93-1970.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
July 29, 1994.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Anne Moorman Reeves, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Willis contends that the trial court erred in imposing conditions of probation in the written judgment and sentence which were not orally pronounced at sentencing. We reverse the sentence and remand for resolution of the discrepancy. See Cleveland v. State, 617 So.2d 1166 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
DAUKSCH, PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.