Case Name: Jeffrey A. FAHRENKAMP, Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, By Gregory F.X. Daly, Collector of Revenue, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-02-21
Citations: 363 S.W.3d 384
Docket Number: No. ED 96787
Parties: Jeffrey A. FAHRENKAMP, Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, By Gregory F.X. Daly, Collector of Revenue, Respondent.
Judges: Before: CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 363
Pages: 384–384

Head Matter:
Jeffrey A. FAHRENKAMP, Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, By Gregory F.X. Daly, Collector of Revenue, Respondent.
No. ED 96787.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Feb. 21, 2012.
Rehearing Denied April 10, 2012.
Jeffrey Fahrenkamp, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Michael D. Stokes, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before: CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Jeffrey Fahrenkamp appeals the trial court's judgment ordering him to pay past-due earnings taxes to the City of St. Louis. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. Rule 84.16(b). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R. Civ. P. (2011), unless otherwise indicated.