Case Name: Fred NEISTAT, et al., Defendants/Appellants, v. R. JACOBS, Plaintiff/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-04-18
Citations: 896 S.W.2d 723
Docket Number: No. 65785
Parties: Fred NEISTAT, et al., Defendants/Appellants, v. R. JACOBS, Plaintiff/Respondent.
Judges: Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 896
Pages: 723–723

Head Matter:
Fred NEISTAT, et al., Defendants/Appellants, v. R. JACOBS, Plaintiff/Respondent.
No. 65785.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
April 18, 1995.
Alan Scott Mandel, St. Louis, for appellant.
Richard Jacobs, St. Louis, pro se.
Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendants, Fred and Carol Neistat, appeal from a jury verdict in favor of Plaintiff, Richard Jacobs, on his petition for negligence and breach of contract. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find no error of law. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).