Case Name: In the Interest of J.D.R., J.D.R., and J.D.T., Minors, Petitioners/Respondents, v. S.T., Respondent/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-03-07
Citations: 17 S.W.3d 566
Docket Number: No. ED 76878
Parties: In the Interest of J.D.R., J.D.R., and J.D.T., Minors, Petitioners/Respondents, v. S.T., Respondent/Appellant.
Judges: Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, Jr., P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and ROBERT E. CRIST, Sr. J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 17
Pages: 566–566

Head Matter:
In the Interest of J.D.R., J.D.R., and J.D.T., Minors, Petitioners/Respondents, v. S.T., Respondent/Appellant.
No. ED 76878.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
March 7, 2000.
Rehearing Denied May 24, 2000.
Douglas S. Pribble, St. Louis, for appellant.
Rita M. Montgomery, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, Jr., P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and ROBERT E. CRIST, Sr. J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Mother, S.T., appeals from the judgment of the trial court terminating her parental rights to her three children, J.D.R., J.D.R. and J.D.T.
We have reviewed the record on appeal and find the judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error' of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).