Case Name: Timothy J. Farnham, Respondent, v. Aaron L. Kittinger, Defendant, and Consolidated Rail Corporation et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1990-12-21
Citations: 168 A.D.2d 923
Docket Number: Appeal No. 2
Parties: Timothy J. Farnham, Respondent, v Aaron L. Kittinger, Defendant, and Consolidated Rail Corporation et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 168
Pages: 923–924

Head Matter:
Timothy J. Farnham, Respondent, v Aaron L. Kittinger, Defendant, and Consolidated Rail Corporation et al., Appellants.
(Appeal No. 2.)

Opinion:
— Appeal from order, insofar as it reserved decision on defendants' motions for summary judgment, unanimously dismissed, and order otherwise affirmed without costs. Same memorandum as in Cobb v Kittinger ([appeal No. 1] 168 AD2d 923 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Chautauqua County, Ricotta, J. —summary judgment.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.