Case Name: JULIUS S. DRESSER, Respondent, v. THE BOATMEN'S FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1888-01
Citations: 54 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 153
Docket Number: 
Parties: JULIUS S. DRESSER, Respondent, v. THE BOATMEN’S FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.
Judges: Follett and Majbtin, JJ., concurred.
Reporter: Supreme Court Reports (Hun)
Volume: 54
Pages: 153–153

Head Matter:
JULIUS S. DRESSER, Respondent, v. THE BOATMEN’S FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.
An appeal from, an order denying a motion for a new trial presents nothing for review unless the grounds of the motion are stated.
Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered in Oneida county upon tbe verdict of a jury, and also from an order denying a motion for a new trial made therein.
The court at General Term, in reference to the appeal from the order denying the motion for a new trial, said: “ The defendant’s motion for a new trial presents no grounds upon which a review may proceed, as no order is presented {Matthews v. Meyberg, 63 N. Y., 656; Dart v. Gillies, 14 J. & S., 560; Howard v. Hayes, 15 id., 89; affirmed,90 N. Y., 643), and the motion does not state the grounds upon which it was made; nothing is before us for review so far as defendant’s motion for a new trial is concerned
I D. Garfield, for the appellant.
Good/win c& Swan, for the respondent.

Opinion:
Opinion by
Haedin, P. J.;
Follett and Majbtin, JJ., concurred.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.