Case Name: Harold Jerome THORNTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Terry O'BRIEN, Warden; Brinson, Lieutenant, Agent formerly known as Brenson; J. Squires, Officer, Agent formerly known as John Doe # 1; A. Crawford, Counselor, Agent formerly known as John Doe # 2, DefendantsAppellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-12-24
Citations: 549 F. App'x 177
Docket Number: No. 13-7539
Parties: Harold Jerome THORNTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Terry O’BRIEN, Warden; Brinson, Lieutenant, Agent formerly known as Brenson; J. Squires, Officer, Agent formerly known as John Doe # 1; A. Crawford, Counselor, Agent formerly known as John Doe # 2, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 549
Pages: 177–178

Head Matter:
Harold Jerome THORNTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Terry O’BRIEN, Warden; Brinson, Lieutenant, Agent formerly known as Brenson; J. Squires, Officer, Agent formerly known as John Doe # 1; A. Crawford, Counselor, Agent formerly known as John Doe # 2, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 13-7539.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 19, 2013.
Decided: Dec. 24, 2013.
Harold Jerome Thornton, Appellant Pro Se. Jarod James Douglas, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Harold Jerome Thornton appeals the district court's order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thornton v. O'Brien, No. 5:12-cv-00074-FPS-JSK (N.D.W.Va. Aug. 21, 2013). We deny Thornton's motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.