Case Name: David R. CORBIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Judge Talmadge BAGGETT; Billy West, District Attorney; The Williford Law Firm; Ellen Hancock, Trial Administrator of the Court; Christa Baker, Trial Administrator of the Court, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-09-28
Citations: 697 F. App'x 258
Docket Number: No. 17-1665
Parties: David R. CORBIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Judge Talmadge BAGGETT; Billy West, District Attorney; The Williford Law Firm; Ellen Hancock, Trial Administrator of the Court; Christa Baker, Trial Administrator of the Court, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 697
Pages: 258–259

Head Matter:
David R. CORBIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Judge Talmadge BAGGETT; Billy West, District Attorney; The Williford Law Firm; Ellen Hancock, Trial Administrator of the Court; Christa Baker, Trial Administrator of the Court, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 17-1665
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: September 26, 2017
Decided: September 28, 2017
David R. Corbin, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
David R. Corbin seeks to appeal the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.
Parties are accorded 30 days after the entry of the district court's final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). "[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement." Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007).
The district court's order was entered on the docket on April 21, 2017. The notice of appeal was filed on May 24, 2017. Because Corbin failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED