Case Name: James A. Deering, Appellant, v. Sarah M. Starr, Respondent
Court: New York Superior Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1886-12-30
Citations: 22 Jones & S. 554
Docket Number: 
Parties: James A. Deering, Appellant, v. Sarah M. Starr, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Reports of cases argued and determined in the Superior Court of the city of New York
Volume: 54
Pages: 554–555

Head Matter:
James A. Deering, Appellant, v. Sarah M. Starr, Respondent.
Decided December 30, 1886.
Appeal by plaintiff from judgment and from order denying motion for new trial, made upon the minutes. Lewis Sanders, for appellant, Albert Matthews, for respondent.
Before Sedgwick, Ch. J., Freedman and Ingraham, JJ.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
"Judgment- and order affirmed, with costs! An irregularity in the form of the judgment should be corrected. The judgment is as if a verdict had been directed. In fact, upon the trial the complaint was dismissed."