Case Name: Charles Edward BARGE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-01-07
Citations: 747 So. 2d 481
Docket Number: No. 1D99-1024
Parties: Charles Edward BARGE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: JOANOS, MINER and DAVIS, JJ., CONCUR.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 747
Pages: 481–481

Head Matter:
Charles Edward BARGE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D99-1024.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jan. 7, 2000.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; Lori D. Stith and L. Michael Billmeier, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Charles Edward Barge, was found guilty by a jury of nine counts of forgery, nine counts of uttering forgeries, and one count of grand theft. Barge appeals the convictions, claiming, among other issues, that the evidence was insufficient to prove that he forged the checks, and that he therefore could not be convicted of forgery, uttering forgeries and grand theft. Our review of the record indicates that the evidence presented by the State was sufficient to prove that the nine checks were forged, and that Barge uttered them, knowing that they were forged. While the evidence was sufficient to prove that appellant uttered the nine forged checks and committed grand theft, the evidence was insufficient to prove that appellant forged any of the nine checks. See Clark v. State, 737 So.2d 634 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). We therefore reverse the forgery convictions, but affirm in all other respects.
AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part.
JOANOS, MINER and DAVIS, JJ., CONCUR.