Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Harry Revo, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1965-01-14
Citations: 15 N.Y.2d 743
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Harry Revo, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 15
Pages: 743–744

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Harry Revo, Appellant.
Argued December 2, 1964;
decided January 14, 1965.
Ira H. Holley for appellant.
Frank S. Hogan, District Attorney (Alan Frederick Leibowitz and H. Richard Uviller of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment reversed and information dismissed upon the ground that the single film which remains in the record is not obscene within the holdings of the United States Supreme Court in Jacobellis v. Ohio (378 U. S. 184); Grove Press v. Gerstein (378 U. S. 577); Tralins v. Gerstein (378 U. S. 576); Kingsley Pictures Corp. v. Regents (360 U. S. 684); Times Film Corp. v. City of Chicago (355 U. S. 35); One, Inc., v. Olesen (355 U. S. 371), and Manual Enterprises v. Day (370 U. S. 478).
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi and Bergan.