Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sidney Derrod EVANS, a/k/a Dooley, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-08-09
Citations: 390 F. App'x 273
Docket Number: No. 10-6641
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sidney Derrod EVANS, a/k/a Dooley, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 390
Pages: 273–273

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sidney Derrod EVANS, a/k/a Dooley, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-6641.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 27, 2010.
Decided: Aug. 9, 2010.
Sidney Derrod Evans, Appellant Pro Se. Darryl James Mitchell, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Ap-pellee.
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Sidney Derrod Evans appeals the district court's order granting his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Evans, No. 2:02-cr-00225-JBF-2 (E.D.Va. filed Mar. 26, 2010 & entered Mar. 29, 2010); see also Dillon v. United States, -U.S.-, 130 S.Ct. 2683, 177 L.Ed.2d 271 (2010) (holding that United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), does not apply to § 3582(c)(2) proceedings). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.