Case Name: Latoria Brooks, an infant, who sues by Debra Brown, her mother and next friend v. Ronald H. Hunt and Genesis Properties, Inc.; Quamecha Brooks, an infant, who sues by Debra Brown, her mother and next friend v. Ronald H. Hunt and Genesis Properties, Inc.
Court: Richmond Circuit Court
Jurisdiction: Virginia
Decision Date: 2007-08-16
Citations: 73 Va. Cir. 518
Docket Number: Case No. LT-1920; Case No. LT-1921
Parties: Latoria Brooks, an infant, who sues by Debra Brown, her mother and next friend v. Ronald H. Hunt and Genesis Properties, Inc. Quamecha Brooks, an infant, who sues by Debra Brown, her mother and next friend v. Ronald H. Hunt and Genesis Properties, Inc.
Judges: 
Reporter: Virginia Circuit Court Opinions
Volume: 73
Pages: 518–519

Head Matter:
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND
Latoria Brooks, an infant, who sues by Debra Brown, her mother and next friend v. Ronald H. Hunt and Genesis Properties, Inc. Quamecha Brooks, an infant, who sues by Debra Brown, her mother and next friend v. Ronald H. Hunt and Genesis Properties, Inc.
Case No. LT-1920
Case No. LT-1921
August 16, 2007

Opinion:
By Judge T. J. Markow
The parties came on August 9, 2007, for argument on the defendant, Genesis Properties, Inc.'s, Motion for Summary Judgment.
Plaintiffs in these consolidated cases claim that they were injured by lead poisoning while they occupied an apartment leased to their aunt and owned by the defendant. Plaintiffs claim that they were exposed to lead because the landlord failed to comply with the statewide building code commonly referred to as "BOCA." They say that the landlords' violation of BOCA makes them negligent per se.
Defendant counters that the tenant's invitees are owed no duty of care beyond that owed to a tenant and that a landlord owes no duty to a tenant in exclusive possession to maintain a premises. See Oliver v. Cashin, 192 Va. 540, 65 S.E.2d 571 (1951). Plaintiff agrees but says that, under the lease between the defendant and the aunt, defendant:
covenants that the Property shall comply with the requirements of building and housing codes materially affecting health and safety and applicable to the property.
See Lease, Paragraph 4.
Under this covenant, landlord has assumed responsibilities to the tenant beyond its common law duties. Under Oliver v. Cashin, supra, these plaintiff-invitees step into the shoes of their aunt, the tenant, and are owed those duties assumed by the landlord to comply with building and housing codes. It is, therefore, ordered that the defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is overruled.