Case Name: FABRICA DE FIDEOS RIVOLI, S.A., Appellant, v. FAMEX INVESTMENTS LIMITED, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2017-07-19
Citations: 225 So. 3d 312
Docket Number: No. 3D17-10
Parties: FABRICA DE FIDEOS RIVOLI, S.A., Appellant, v. FAMEX INVESTMENTS LIMITED, Appellee.
Judges: Before LAGOA, SCALES and LUCK, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 225
Pages: 312–312

Head Matter:
FABRICA DE FIDEOS RIVOLI, S.A., Appellant, v. FAMEX INVESTMENTS LIMITED, Appellee.
No. 3D17-10
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Opinion filed July 19, 2017.
Dorta Law, and Matías R., Dorta, for appellant.
Jones & Adams, P.A, and Matthew L. Jones, for appellee.
Before LAGOA, SCALES and LUCK, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Fabrica de Fideos Rivoli, S.A., the defendant below, appeals a non-final order denying its motion to dismiss the instant action for lack of personal jurisdiction. Concluding that the trial court correctly applied the two-prong test for determining whether personal jurisdiction may be exercised over a nonresident defendant, we affirm. See Venetian Salami Co. v. Parthenais, 554 So.2d 499, 502 (Fla. 1989) (providing that personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant exists where: (1) the complaint alleges sufficient jurisdictional facts to satisfy Florida's long-arm statute, section 48.193 of the Florida Statutes; and (2) the nonresident defendant has sufficient minimum contacts with Florida to satisfy constitutional due process concerns).
Affirmed.