Case Name: Ernesto FERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-06-21
Citations: 760 So. 2d 300
Docket Number: No. 3D98-1122
Parties: Ernesto FERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and LEVY and GREEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 760
Pages: 300–301

Head Matter:
Ernesto FERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D98-1122.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
June 21, 2000.
Julio Gutierrez, Miami, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Christine E. Zahralban and Roberta Mandel, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and LEVY and GREEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Rejecting both of the defendant's contentions on appeal, we conclude that a proposed instruction on the defense of voluntary intoxication was properly rejected, see Jacobs v. State, 396 So.2d 1113 (Fla.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 933, 102 S.Ct. 430, 70 L.Ed.2d 239 (1981), and that the evidence was sufficient to support the burglary conviction.
Affirmed.