Case Name: Josephine M. Bogle, Appellant, v. City of New York, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1949-04-20
Citations: 299 N.Y. 620
Docket Number: 
Parties: Josephine M. Bogle, Appellant, v. City of New York, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 299
Pages: 620–621

Head Matter:
Josephine M. Bogle, Appellant, v. City of New York, Respondent.
Argued April 11, 1949;
decided April 20, 1949.
Louis J. Merrell and Sidney M. Wittner for appellant.
JohnP. McGrath, Corporation Counsel (Joseph J. Lucchi and Seymour B. Quel of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We cannot say, as a matter of law, on this record that there is no room for the exercise of discretion. The Appellate .Division having reversed the order of the Special Term and denied the motion upon questions of law, we accordingly reverse the order appealed from and remit the matter to that court for compliance with section 602 of the Civil Practice Act.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the matter remitted to that court for compliance with section 602 of the Civil Practice Act, without costs.
Loughban, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fund and Bromley, JJ., concur.
Order reversed, etc.