Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ramon MORENO-OROZCO, aka Ramon Mata, aka Ramon Orozco-Moreno, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-12-12
Citations: 156 F. App'x 986
Docket Number: No. 04-10519; D.C. No. CR-03-01088-MHM
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Ramon MORENO-OROZCO, aka Ramon Mata, aka Ramon Orozco-Moreno, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before GOODWIN, W. FLETCHER and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 156
Pages: 986–987

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Ramon MORENO-OROZCO, aka Ramon Mata, aka Ramon Orozco-Moreno, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 04-10519. D.C. No. CR-03-01088-MHM.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 5, 2005.
Decided Dec. 12, 2005.
Gary M. Restaino, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Michael S. Reeves, Esq., Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before GOODWIN, W. FLETCHER and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Ramon Moreno-Orozco appeals from his conviction and 40-month sentence for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Moreno-Orozco has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Moreno-Orozco has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Because our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82-83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), indicates that Moreno-Orozco knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal and was sentenced within the terms of the plea agreement, we enforce the waiver and dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2000) (stating that an appeal waiver is valid when it is entered knowingly and voluntarily); see also United States v. Cardenas, 405 F.3d 1046, 1048 (9th Cir. 2005) (noting that the changes in sentencing law imposed by United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), did not render waiver of appeal involuntary and unknowing).
Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the appeal is DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.