Case Name: Pietro BIEZER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-09-23
Citations: 117 S.W.3d 677
Docket Number: No. ED 81214
Parties: Pietro BIEZER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 117
Pages: 677–678

Head Matter:
Pietro BIEZER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent.
No. ED 81214.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Sept. 23, 2003.
Kent Denzel, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., & Patrick Morgan, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Pietro Biezer appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. The trial court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have, however, been provided with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).