Case Name: Arthur BRITT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2016-10-07
Citations: 200 So. 3d 801
Docket Number: No. 1D15-2827
Parties: Arthur BRITT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ROBERTS, C.J., WETHERELL, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 200
Pages: 801–802

Head Matter:
Arthur BRITT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D15-2827.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Oct. 7, 2016.
Diana L. Johnson of Johnson and Lufra-no, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Virginia Chester Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Based on the State's proper concession of error, we reverse and remand for resen-tencing on Counts I and II in accordance with Williams v. State, 186 So.3d 989 (Fla.2016), which held that consecutive mandatory minimum terms under the 10-20-Life statute are permissible but not mandatory where, as here, the defendant shot at multiple victims. In all other respects, we affirm.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED and REMANDED in part.
ROBERTS, C.J., WETHERELL, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.