Case Name: ROGOWSKI v. BRILL
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1912-01-05
Citations: 132 N.Y.S. 1144
Docket Number: 
Parties: ROGOWSKI v. BRILL.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 132
Pages: 1144–1144

Head Matter:
ROGOWSKI v. BRILL.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
January 5, 1912.)
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Sixth District. Action by Henry Rogowski against Max Brill. From a judgment of the Municipal Court of the City of New York, entered in favor of the plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed, and new trial ordered. See, also, 132 N. Y. Supp. 370. S. C. Sugarman, for appellant. Swan, Beardsley & Moore, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The evidence adduced by the plaintiff is insufficient to overcome the objections sustained by this court in the case of Rogowski v. Brill, 131 N. Y. Supp. 589 (October Appellate Term, 1911). Upon a new trial, the parties may present the issue involved in a manner that will enable the court to determine the circumstances under which the notes were indorsed by the defendant. Judgment reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.