Case Name: David P. FARLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles F. McDARRIS, Attorney for C.A.S.A., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-02-21
Citations: 29 F. App'x 175
Docket Number: No. 01-2213
Parties: David P. FARLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles F. McDARRIS, Attorney for C.A.S.A., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 29
Pages: 175–175

Head Matter:
David P. FARLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles F. McDARRIS, Attorney for C.A.S.A., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 01-2213.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 14, 2002.
Decided Feb. 21, 2002.
David P. Farley, Pro Se.
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
David P. Farley, a North Carolina inmate, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp.2000) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Farley v. McDarris, No. CA-01-580-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 20 & Sept. 25, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.