Case Name: Terrance BATES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1992-10-13
Citations: 863 S.W.2d 616
Docket Number: No. 61723
Parties: Terrance BATES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 863
Pages: 616–616

Head Matter:
Terrance BATES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. 61723.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Oct. 13, 1992.
Dave Hemingway, St. Louis, for movant-appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant appeals from the denial without an evidentiary hearing of his Rule 24.035 motion. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).