Case Name: Benji BRUNO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-08-30
Citations: 679 So. 2d 56
Docket Number: No. 95-00420
Parties: Benji BRUNO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and LAZZARA and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 679
Pages: 56–57

Head Matter:
Benji BRUNO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 95-00420.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Aug. 30, 1996.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Jeffrey M. Pearlman, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ronald Napolitano, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Benji Bruno challenges his sentence as well as certain conditions of probation and costs imposed after his conviction for burglary. We affirm his sentence and the conditions of probation. The state agrees the $2.00 cost imposed pursuant to section 943.25(13), Florida Statutes (1993), was not orally pronounced at sentencing and no statutory authority was given for the imposition of the $25.00 administrative cost. Therefore, we remand this ease to the trial court with instructions to strike these costs from the judgment and sentence. In all other re spects the judgment and sentence are affirmed.
ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and LAZZARA and QUINCE, JJ., concur.