Case Name: Sutton Investing Corporation, Respondent, v. City of Syracuse, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2004-11-19
Citations: 12 A.D.3d 1201
Docket Number: 
Parties: Sutton Investing Corporation, Respondent, v City of Syracuse, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 12
Pages: 1201–1201

Head Matter:
Sutton Investing Corporation, Respondent, v City of Syracuse, Appellant.
[784 NYS2d 436]

Opinion:
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Robert J. Nicholson, J.), entered March 5, 2003. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint.
It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs.
Memorandum: Defendant limited its appeal to that part of an order denying its motion seeking to dismiss the complaint on the ground that plaintiff failed to serve a written verified claim prior to commencement of the action. Because Supreme Court granted plaintiffs cross motion for leave to amend the complaint and for leave to serve a late notice of claim, issues involving the original complaint are moot (see Chalasani v Neuman, 64 NY2d 879, 880 [1985]; Baker v 16 Sutton Place Apt. Corp., 2 AD3d 119, 120 [2003]). Present—Pigott, Jr., PJ., Pine, Scudder, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.