Case Name: Jonathan Ackerman Coles, appellant, v. City of Newark et al., respondents
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1924-03-03
Citations: 95 N.J. Eq. 775
Docket Number: 
Parties: Jonathan Ackerman Coles, appellant, v. City of Newark et al., respondents.
Judges: Eor affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Min-turn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbaci-i, Campbell, Heppenheimer, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark—11.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 95
Pages: 775–775

Head Matter:
Jonathan Ackerman Coles, appellant, v. City of Newark et al., respondents.
[Decided March 3d, 1924.]
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Baches, whose opinion is reported in 95 N. J. Eq. IS.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Baches.
Eor affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Min-turn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbaci-i, Campbell, Heppenheimer, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark—11.
For reversal—None.