Case Name: Mr. and Mrs. Floyd BROCK, individually and as next friend of Rachel Brock, a minor, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. MERRELL DOW PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1989-09-08
Citations: 884 F.2d 167
Docket Number: No. 88-2311
Parties: Mr. and Mrs. Floyd BROCK, individually and as next friend of Rachel Brock, a minor, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. MERRELL DOW PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, REAVLEY, POLITZ, KING, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, and DUHE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 884
Pages: 167–170

Head Matter:
Mr. and Mrs. Floyd BROCK, individually and as next friend of Rachel Brock, a minor, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. MERRELL DOW PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 88-2311.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Sept. 8, 1989.
Robert M. Dato, Santa Monica, Cal., O.J. Weber, Mehaffey, Weber, Keigh & Gonsou-lin, Beaumont, Tex., and Ramey, Flock, Hutchins, Jeffus, McClendon & Crawford, P.C., Tyler, Tex., for defendant-appellant.
Thomas H. Bleakley, Detroit, Mich., W. James Kronzer, and Richard Warren Mi-thoff, Houston, Tex., for plaintiffs-appel-lees.
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, REAVLEY, POLITZ, KING, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, and DUHE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
PER CURIAM:
The judges in regular active service of this court having been polled at the request of one of them, and a majority of the judges having voted against granting rehearing en banc in this case (Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and Local Rule 35), the suggestion for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.