Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Gabriel Fierros GARCIA, also known as Gabriel Fierros-Garcia, also known as Gabriel Fierros, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-10-17
Citations: 583 F. App'x 317
Docket Number: No. 13-20588
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Gabriel Fierros GARCIA, also known as Gabriel Fierros-Garcia, also known as Gabriel Fierros, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 583
Pages: 317–317

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Gabriel Fierros GARCIA, also known as Gabriel Fierros-Garcia, also known as Gabriel Fierros, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-20588
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Oct. 17, 2014.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Gabriel Fierros Garcia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Fierros Garcia has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nohfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cm. R. 42.2. .
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.