Case Name: DRUM v. DRUM
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1926-07-13
Citations: 121 Okla. 123
Docket Number: No. 17262
Parties: DRUM v. DRUM.
Judges: 
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 121
Pages: 123–124

Head Matter:
DRUM v. DRUM.
No. 17262
Opinion Filed July 13, 1926.
Hargis & Yarbrough and O. L. Williams, for plaintiff in error.
G. B. Sturgell, S. T. Carman, Lydick & McPherren, and M. E. Jordan, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is .a divorce action. Defendant in error was decreed a divorce by the district court ofi Osage county on the 21st day of November, 1925. On the 24th day of November, 1925, plaintiff in error filed a motion for a new trial, and also filed no tice of intenticn to appeal, as provided in divorce actions. On the 7th day of December, 1925, motion for a new trial was overruled and plaintiff in error gave notice of appeal and was given 60 days in which to serve case-made, which expired on the 5th day of February, 1926. Case-made was served on the 5th day of March, 1926, one month after the time for service had expired. A case-made served after the expiration.-of the time for service is a nullity and confers no jurisdiction on the Supreme Court to review the appeal. The appeal is dismissed.