Case Name: Clinton H. Blake, et al., appellants, v. Isidor Rosenthal, et al., respondents; Edmund W. Converse, et al., appellants, v. Isidor Rosenthal, et al., respondents; Henry Lewis, et al., appellants, v. Isidor Rosenthal, et al., respondents
Court: New York Superior Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1882-12-30
Citations: 17 Jones & S. 532
Docket Number: 
Parties: Clinton H. Blake, et al., appellants, v. Isidor Rosenthal, et al., respondents; Edmund W. Converse, et al., appellants, v. Isidor Rosenthal, et al., respondents; Henry Lewis, et al., appellants, v. Isidor Rosenthal, et al., respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Reports of cases argued and determined in the Superior Court of the city of New York
Volume: 49
Pages: 532–532

Head Matter:
Clinton H. Blake, et al., appellants, v. Isidor Rosenthal, et al., respondents; Edmund W. Converse, et al., appellants, v. Isidor Rosenthal, et al., respondents; Henry Lewis, et al., appellants, v. Isidor Rosenthal, et al., respondents.
Decided December 30, 1882.
Appeal by the plaintiffs in each <of the above entitled actions from the judgment dismissing the complaint upon the merits.
Marsh, Wilson & Wallace, for appellants. Richard S. Newcomb, for respondents.

Opinion:
Opinion by Freedman, J.; Sedgwick, Ch. J., and Russell, J., concur. Judgments appealed from severally affirmed, with costs.