Case Name: Frederick BAILEY et al., Petitioners, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1994-02-10
Citations: 631 So. 2d 304
Docket Number: No. 81621
Parties: Frederick BAILEY et al., Petitioners, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 631
Pages: 304–304

Head Matter:
Frederick BAILEY et al., Petitioners, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 81621.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Feb. 10, 1994.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Chief, Appellate Div., Second Judicial Circuit, Tallahassee, for petitioners.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., James W. Rogers, Asst. Atty. Gen., Bureau Chief, Criminal Appeals, and Gypsy Bailey, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We review State v. Bailey, 614 So.2d 1224 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993), on the ground that the district court declared a statute valid. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.
On the authority of Brown v. State, 629 So.2d 841 (Fla.1994), the decision under review is hereby quashed and the case remanded for further proceedings consistent with this Court's opinion in Brown.
It is so ordered.
BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.