Case Name: Griffith et al. v. Smith et al.
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1923-06-07
Citations: 155 Ga. 720
Docket Number: No. 3415
Parties: Griffith et al. v. Smith et al.
Judges: All the Justices concur.
Reporter: Georgia Reports
Volume: 155
Pages: 720–720

Head Matter:
Griffith et al. v. Smith et al.
No. 3415.
June 7, 1923.
Description, and counseFs names, as in case next before.

Opinion:
Hill, J.'
In this ease a distress warrant was sworn out by the defendants against the plaintiffs, based on the rent contract involved in the case of Griffith v. Smith, this day decided. The trial judge directed a verdict on the pleadings, after proof was submitted as to the amount of rent due. The rulings m the above-stated case are controlling here; and it follows that the court did not err in directing a verdict for the plain.tiffs. Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.