Case Name: In re Richard HAMLETT, Debtor. Richard Hamlett, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Evelyn K. Krippendorf, Trustee, Trustee-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-10-10
Citations: 47 F. App'x 673
Docket Number: No. 02-1390
Parties: In re Richard HAMLETT, Debtor. Richard Hamlett, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Evelyn K. Krippendorf, Trustee, Trustee-Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 47
Pages: 673–674

Head Matter:
In re Richard HAMLETT, Debtor. Richard Hamlett, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Evelyn K. Krippendorf, Trustee, Trustee-Appellee.
No. 02-1390.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 30, 2002.
Decided Oct. 10, 2002.
Gary M. Bowman, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. Evelyn K. Krippendorf, The Krippendorf Firm, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Richard Hamlett appeals the district court's order affirming the bankruptcy court's order denying Hamlett's motion to reconsider a prior order denying his request to file a late notice of appeal. Our review of the record, the parties' briefs, and the opinions below discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Hamlett v. Krippendorf, No. CA-02-60-7 (E.D.Va. Mar. 21, 2002); No. BK-98-2653-7 RKR (Bankr.W.D.Va. Dec. 4, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.