Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymundo GAVINO-MARISCAL, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-02-14
Citations: 519 F. App'x 964
Docket Number: No. 12-10276
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymundo GAVINO-MARISCAL, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 519
Pages: 964–965

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymundo GAVINO-MARISCAL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-10276.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 11, 2013.
Filed Feb. 14, 2013.
Christina Marie Cabanillas, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Florence Bruemmer, Law Offices of Florence M. Bruemmer, PC, Anthem, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Raymundo Gavino-Mariscal appeals from the district court's judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 120-month sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A)®; and 846; and conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(l)(A)(ii)(II); and 846. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Gavino-Mariscal's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Gavino-Mariscal the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Gavino-Mariscal has waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346,102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir.2009). We accordingly dismiss the appeal. See id. at 988.
Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.
disposition is not appropriate for publication and except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.