Case Name: Sergey SHISHKIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Angelo DWYER, Immigration Officer, Iea; Ericka Duran, Deportation Officer; Immigration and Customs Enforcement; George Snyder, Warden of Rivers Correctional Institution; Federal Bureau of Prisons; Doe, John, said name being fictitious, it being the intention of plaintiff to designate any and all ICE, BOP, Rivers Officers being responsible for actions described, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-10-15
Citations: 359 F. App'x 361
Docket Number: No. 09-6632
Parties: Sergey SHISHKIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Angelo DWYER, Immigration Officer, Iea; Ericka Duran, Deportation Officer; Immigration and Customs Enforcement; George Snyder, Warden of Rivers Correctional Institution; Federal Bureau of Prisons; Doe, John, said name being fictitious, it being the intention of plaintiff to designate any and all ICE, BOP, Rivers Officers being responsible for actions described, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before MICHAEL and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 359
Pages: 361–362

Head Matter:
Sergey SHISHKIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Angelo DWYER, Immigration Officer, Iea; Ericka Duran, Deportation Officer; Immigration and Customs Enforcement; George Snyder, Warden of Rivers Correctional Institution; Federal Bureau of Prisons; Doe, John, said name being fictitious, it being the intention of plaintiff to designate any and all ICE, BOP, Rivers Officers being responsible for actions described, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 09-6632.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 5, 2009.
Decided: Oct. 15, 2009.
Sergey Shishkin, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MICHAEL and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Sergey Shishkin, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Shishkin v. Dwyer, No. 5:08-hc-02152-H (E.D.N.C. Mar. 18, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.