Case Name: WILSON vs. CIRCUIT JUDGE (Wayne); CUNEO vs. CIRCUIT JUDGE (Wayne); OTERI vs. CIRCUIT JUDGE (Wayne); ORR & LAMBENHEIMER CO. vs. CIRCUIT JUDGE (Wayne); MOBILE FRUIT & TRADING Co. vs. CIRCUIT JUDGE (Wayne)
Court: Michigan Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Michigan
Decision Date: 1895-11-05
Citations: 1 McGrath 80
Docket Number: No. 15154; No. 15155; No. 15156; No. 15157; No. 15158
Parties: WILSON vs. CIRCUIT JUDGE (Wayne), CUNEO vs. CIRCUIT JUDGE (Wayne), OTERI vs. CIRCUIT JUDGE (Wayne), ORR & LAMBENHEIMER CO. vs. CIRCUIT JUDGE (Wayne), MOBILE FRUIT & TRADING Co. vs. CIRCUIT JUDGE (Wayne),
Judges: 
Reporter: Mandamus cases decided in the Supreme court of Michigan
Volume: 1
Pages: 80–84

Head Matter:
WILSON vs. CIRCUIT JUDGE (Wayne), CUNEO vs. CIRCUIT JUDGE (Wayne), OTERI vs. CIRCUIT JUDGE (Wayne), ORR & LAMBENHEIMER CO. vs. CIRCUIT JUDGE (Wayne), MOBILE FRUIT & TRADING Co. vs. CIRCUIT JUDGE (Wayne),
No. 15154. No. 15155. No. 15156. No. 15157. No. 15158.

Opinion:
To vacate orders quashing writs of capias ad respondendum, because of tbe alleged insufficiency of the affidavits upon which the orders to hold to bail were based.
Granted November 5, 1895, with costé in each case.
These orders were entered in cases commenced against Phillip Curro, (see preceding case No. 80), upon like charges, except that in these no charge was made as to misrepresentations when the goods were purchased.