Case Name: Eugene W. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-09-05
Citations: 238 F. App'x 992
Docket Number: No. 07-1308
Parties: Eugene W. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 238
Pages: 992–993

Head Matter:
Eugene W. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 07-1308.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 30, 2007.
Decided: Sept. 5, 2007.
Eugene W. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Anita K. Henry, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Eugene W. Johnson appeals the district court order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting the Government's motion to dismiss Johnson's civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the district court's reasoning that Johnson did not exhaust his administrative remedies under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 2675(a) (2000). See Johnson v. United States, No. 2:05-cv-00522-WDK (E.D.Va. Mar. 19, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.