Case Name: SAM HOGAN and WALT COOK v. STATE
Court: Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1913-06-28
Citations: 9 Okla. Crim. 739
Docket Number: No. A-1752
Parties: SAM HOGAN and WALT COOK v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: Oklahoma Criminal Reports
Volume: 9
Pages: 739–739

Head Matter:
SAM HOGAN and WALT COOK v. STATE.
No. A-1752.
Opinion Filed June 28, 1913.
Appeal from Garfield County Court; Winfield Scott, Judge..
Sam Hogan and Walt Cook were convicted of unlawfully selling intoxicating liquors and appeal.
Affirmed.
W. O. Cromwell, for plaintiff in error.
Chas. West, Atty. Gen., Smith C. Matson, and E. G. Spilman, Asst. Attys. Gen., for the State.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This appeal is prosecuted from a conviction had in the county court of Garfield county, on the 2ith day of April, 1912. •The verdict of the jury, omitting the formal parts, is as follows: "We the jury empaneled and sworn to try the issues in the above entitled cause, do, upon our oaths, find the defendants guilty as charged in the information, and assess the punishment of Sam Hogan at ninety days in the county jail and a fine of two hundred and fifty dollars and assess the punishment of Walt Cook at one hundred and eighty days in the county jail and a fine of five hundred dollars. (Signed) Jos. M. McCoy, Foreman."
An appeal was taken by filing in this court June 1st, 1912, a petition in error with case-made. The questions presented have heretofore been passed upon and determined adversely to the contentions of the learned counsel for plaintiffs in error. It is sufficient to say that the guilt of the plaintiffs in error was satisfactorily proven, and no testimony was offered in this behalf. Finding nothing that would justify a reversal, the judgments of conviction are hereby affirmed and the causo remanded to the county court of Garfield county, with direction to enforce its sentence therein.