Case Name: Alfred W. RICCO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1984-02-08
Citations: 445 So. 2d 627
Docket Number: No. 82-2571
Parties: Alfred W. RICCO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ANSTEAD, C.J., and HURLEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 445
Pages: 627–627

Head Matter:
Alfred W. RICCO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 82-2571.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb. 8, 1984..
Rehearing Denied March 14, 1984.
Dorothy M. Walker of Walker & Vetrick, Belle Glade, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Lydia M. Valenti, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Defendant's conviction and sentence for manslaughter are affirmed on the authority of Dolan v. State, 85 So.2d 139 (Fla.1956). In reaching this decision, we have also concluded that the state's use of the defendant's grand jury testimony did not constitute fundamental error. Consequently, the various errors assigned to this point cannot be asserted on appeal due to the defendant's failure to object properly at trial. See Castor v. State, 365 So.2d 701 (Fla.1978).
ANSTEAD, C.J., and HURLEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.