Case Name: Barry ANDERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2001-09-26
Citations: 796 So. 2d 1205
Docket Number: No. 4D01-1070
Parties: Barry ANDERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: DELL, WARNER and FARMER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 796
Pages: 1205–1205

Head Matter:
Barry ANDERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D01-1070.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Sept. 26, 2001.
Barry Anderson, Raiford, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and David M. Schultz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Barry Anderson appeals the summary denial of his post-conviction motion. We find that further proceedings are required on one of his allegations.
The allegation that Anderson's trial counsel failed to investigate potential defense witness Derrick Harvey stated a legally sufficient claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. See Cohens v. State, 775 So.2d 336 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (claim of failure to investigate or call an exculpatory witness presents a prima facie case of entitlement to relief for ineffective assistance of counsel, unless rebutted by evidence in the record or testimony at an evidentiary hearing).
According to Anderson's motion, Harvey's testimony would have been that State witness Lisa Cornwell admitted to him that she did not really witness the crime, but had felt pressured by the police to say that she did. The portion of the record relied upon by the trial court does not conclusively refute Anderson's allegations.
Accordingly, we reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing on this claim only. The denial order is affirmed in all other respects.
DELL, WARNER and FARMER, JJ., concur.