Case Name: Rodrigus RASPBERRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-01-10
Citations: 181 S.W.3d 601
Docket Number: No. ED 85901
Parties: Rodrigus RASPBERRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 181
Pages: 601–601

Head Matter:
Rodrigus RASPBERRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 85901.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Jan. 10, 2006.
Irene Earns, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Evan J. Buchheim, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Rodrigus Raspberry ("Movant") appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Marion County denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. In his appeal, Mov-ant argues that the motion court clearly erred when it failed to find that plea counsel rendered ineffective assistance when she misinformed Movant that, if he entered a guilty plea, he would be eligible to serve his sentence in a long-term drug treatment facility and upon successful completion of that program, Movant would be released on probation.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court's decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the award pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).