Case Name: ROUNDS & PORTER LUMBER CO. v. SHERRY et al.
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1933-02-14
Citations: 162 Okla. 76
Docket Number: No. 22465
Parties: ROUNDS & PORTER LUMBER CO. v. SHERRY et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 162
Pages: 76–77

Head Matter:
ROUNDS & PORTER LUMBER CO. v. SHERRY et al.
No. 22465.
Opinion Filed Feb. 14, 1933.
Hudson & Hudson, for plaintiff in error.
E. G. Wilson and Roy Sherry, for defendants in error.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
On the 15th day of June, 1931, appellant filed petition in error with case-made attached, appealing from a judgment entered in favor of defendant in district court of Tulsa county, Okla., under date of December 18, 1930. Motion to dismiss this appeal was filed June 25, 1931, and response thereto July 20, 1931; a reply to the response was filed on the same date. The motion to dismiss urges, first, that no notice of appeal was given; and second, that the case-made was not served and settled within any extension of time under the law.
Movant cited the case of Minnetonka Oil Co. v. Cleveland Vitrified Brick Co., 48 Okla. 156, 149 P. 1136, the syllabus of which is as follows:
"It is not necessary to file a motion for new trial before bringing to this court for review a ruling of the court sustaining an objection to the introduction of any evidence and judgment dismissing the case."
See, to the same effect, the case of Clapper v. Putnam Co., 70 Okla. 99, 158 P. 297. It is the order of the court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the judgment of the lower court affirmed.