Case Name: George B. Raymond, Respondent, v. George F. Davy, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1937-06-17
Citations: 167 Misc. 127
Docket Number: 
Parties: George B. Raymond, Respondent, v. George F. Davy, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 167
Pages: 127–127

Head Matter:
George B. Raymond, Respondent, v. George F. Davy, Appellant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
June 17, 1937.
L. T. Fetzer, for the appellant.
Morrison & Lynn [Charles Roden of counsel], for the respondent.
Affg. 160 Misc. 388.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
While the form of the answer is unimportant on a motion for summary judgment, we think the affidavits justify the conclusion that the answer was sham.
Order and judgment affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
All concur. Present — Lydon, Levy and Frankenthaler, JJ.