Case Name: Shellman PETERSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1987-04-07
Citations: 505 So. 2d 16
Docket Number: No. 85-1582
Parties: Shellman PETERSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before HUBBART, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 505
Pages: 16–17

Head Matter:
Shellman PETERSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 85-1582.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Tird Distrhict.
April 7, 1987.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and James H. Greason, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Richard L. Polin, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Jeri L. Weintraub, Certified Legal Intern, for appellee.
Before HUBBART, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the defendant's convictions for first-degree murder and robbery with a firearm upon a holding that the claimed error that the trial court unduly restricted the defendant's cross-examination of his accomplice was not preserved for review by an appropriate proffer of the intended testimony. See Silveira-Hemandez v. State, 495 So.2d 914 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); A. McD. v. State, 422 So.2d 336 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Ketrow v. State, 414 So.2d 298 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982).
Affirmed.