Case Name: Joseph R. PROFFITT, D. V. M., Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF VETERINARY MEDICINE, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1981-05-19
Citations: 399 So. 2d 39
Docket Number: No. 80-2152
Parties: Joseph R. PROFFITT, D. V. M., Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF VETERINARY MEDICINE, Appellee.
Judges: Before HUBBART, C. J., and BARK-DULL and FERGUSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 399
Pages: 39–39

Head Matter:
Joseph R. PROFFITT, D. V. M., Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF VETERINARY MEDICINE, Appellee.
No. 80-2152.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 19, 1981.
Paul A. Lehrman, Richard B. Bush, Tallahassee, Roger McClelland, Key West, for appellant.
Boyd, Harris & Smith, Tallahassee, for appellee.
Before HUBBART, C. J., and BARK-DULL and FERGUSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. We find the Board properly reviewed the entire record and accepted the hearing officer's findings of fact, adding as additional facts only those admitted to by appellant in the record. The Board acted within its discretion in determining the disciplinary penalty. § 120.57(l)(b)(9), Fla. Stat. (1979); § 120.68(10), Fla.Stat. (1979); § 474.214, Fla.Stat. (1979). Florida Real Estate Comm'n v. Webb, 367 So.2d 201 (Fla.1978); McDonald v. Department of Banking and Finance, 346 So.2d 569 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977), cert. denied, 346 So.2d 1256 (Fla.1977).