Case Name: Arthur PEOPLES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1988-11-08
Citations: 533 So. 2d 894
Docket Number: No. 88-939
Parties: Arthur PEOPLES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 533
Pages: 894–895

Head Matter:
Arthur PEOPLES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 88-939.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 8, 1988.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and N. Joseph Durant, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Debora J. Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant and appellee agree that the trial court's oral pronouncement of sentence, pursuant to a valid plea bargain, was not reflected in the trial court's written order. We vacate the sentence and remand to the trial court for entry of an order that conforms to the terms of the plea bargain and the oral pronouncement. See Williams v. State, 525 So.2d 458 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).
Sentence vacated; cause remanded with directions.