Case Name: George C. DREOS, Appellant, v. Joseph SITNICK and Michael Agriesti, Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1962-10-18
Citations: 309 F.2d 232
Docket Number: No. 16973
Parties: George C. DREOS, Appellant, v. Joseph SITNICK and Michael Agriesti, Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 309
Pages: 232–233

Head Matter:
George C. DREOS, Appellant, v. Joseph SITNICK and Michael Agriesti, Appellees.
No. 16973.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued Oct. 18, 1962.
Decided Oct. 18, 1962.
Petition for Rehearing En Banc Denied En Banc Nov. 20, 1962.
George C. Dreos, appellant pro se.
Joseph Sitnick, Washington, D. C., with whom Joseph B. Calandriello, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for ap-pellees.
Before Bastían, Burger and Wright, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is a paid appeal from a judgment of the District Court dismissing appellant's complaint in a libel suit.
On the record before us, the appeal should be dismissed as frivolous, and an order to that end will be entered.
Appeal dismissed as frivolous.