Case Name: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. WOLF ENVELOPE COMPANY (an Ohio Corporation); COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Jennie LITTMAN; COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Alan L. LITTMAN; COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Elsa L. SELDEN; COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Rhoda L. AFFELDER; COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Harry F. AFFELDER; COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Doris L. LUX. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. ESTATE of Nathan I. DRYFOOS, Deceased, The First National Bank of Miami, Executor
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1952-07-21
Citations: 197 F.2d 864
Docket Number: Nos. 11639-11646
Parties: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. WOLF ENVELOPE COMPANY (an Ohio Corporation). COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Jennie LITTMAN. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Alan L. LITTMAN. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Elsa L. SELDEN. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Rhoda L. AFFELDER. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Harry F. AFFELDER. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Doris L. LUX. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. ESTATE of Nathan I. DRYFOOS, Deceased, The First National Bank of Miami, Executor.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 197
Pages: 864–864

Head Matter:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. WOLF ENVELOPE COMPANY (an Ohio Corporation). COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Jennie LITTMAN. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Alan L. LITTMAN. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Elsa L. SELDEN. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Rhoda L. AFFELDER. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Harry F. AFFELDER. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Doris L. LUX. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. ESTATE of Nathan I. DRYFOOS, Deceased, The First National Bank of Miami, Executor.
Nos. 11639-11646.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
July 21, 1952.
Ellis N. Slack, Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
Daniel W. Loeser, Irwin N. Loeser, Cleveland, Ohio, Mooney, Hahn, Loeser, Keough & Freedheim, Gleveland, Ohio, of ■counsel, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
It Is ordered that the petition for review in each of the above-entitled cases be dismissed pursuant to motion of counsel for petitioner. 17 T.C. 471.