Case Name: Pamela RUPPERT and Jason Ruppert, Appellants, v. RBC CENTURA BANK, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2013-04-10
Citations: 112 So. 3d 563
Docket Number: No. 4D11-2344
Parties: Pamela RUPPERT and Jason Ruppert, Appellants, v. RBC CENTURA BANK, Appellee.
Judges: STEVENSON, GROSS and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 112
Pages: 563–564

Head Matter:
Pamela RUPPERT and Jason Ruppert, Appellants, v. RBC CENTURA BANK, Appellee.
No. 4D11-2344.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
April 10, 2013.
Rehearing Denied May 10, 2013.
Robert P. Lithman of Orshan, Lithman, Seiden, Ramos, Hatton, Huesmann & Fa-jardo, LLP, Coral Gables, for appellants.
N. Alejandra Arroyave and Jeffrey S. Lapin of Lapin & Leichtling, LLP, Coral Gables, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the partial summary judgment of foreclosure of an equitable lien. On remand, we direct the trial court to first resolve the issues raised by the Rup-perts in their affirmative defenses before entering judgment.
We note that generally this court will not accept jurisdiction over "piecemeal appeals." See Flinn v. Flinn, 68 So.3d 424, 425 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (dismissing appeal when party appealed the resolution of one count of a multi-count complaint, and the appealed count was interrelated with the pending counts). We review the summary judgment in this case because it may not be possible to correct the error after the disposition of the entire case. See Fisher v. Tanglewood at Suntree Country Club Condo. Ass'n, 669 So.2d 1050, 1051 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) ("Although this permits piecemeal review, it is the only way to correct an erroneous ruling that may not be subject to correction at a later date.").
Reversed and remanded with instructions.
STEVENSON, GROSS and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.