Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gokhan BERGAL, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-04-26
Citations: 647 F. App'x 198
Docket Number: No. 16-6071
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gokhan BERGAL, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 647
Pages: 198–199

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gokhan BERGAL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-6071.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 21, 2016.
Decided: April 26, 2016.
Gokhan Bergal, Appellant Pro Se. Andrea L. Smith, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appel-lee.
Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Gokhan Bergal appeals the district court's order denying his motion for an extension of time to appeal the court's August 6, 2015, order denying his motions for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). Bergal did not seek an extension of time until November 13, nearly two months after the expiration of the excusable neglect period. See Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(1)(A), (4); cf. Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988) (holding that prisoner's notice of appeal is deemed filed on date he delivered it to prison officials for mailing to court). Because the district court was without authority to grant Ber-gal's motion, we affirm the court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.