Case Name: Robert L. Rook et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. 60 Key Centre, Inc., et al., Respondents; 60 Key Centre, Inc., ThirdParty Plaintiff, v. Aluma Systems Corporation, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent; Burke Company, Fourth-Party Plaintiff, v. Frank L. Ciminelli Construction Co., Inc., FourthParty Defendant-Respondent; Mobile Materials Handling Equipment, Ltd., Fourth-Party Plaintiff, v. Frank L. Ciminelli Construction Co., Inc., et al., Fourth-Party DefendantsRespondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1997-05-30
Citations: 239 A.D.2d 928
Docket Number: Appeal No. 2
Parties: Robert L. Rook et al., Appellants-Respondents, v 60 Key Centre, Inc., et al., Respondents. 60 Key Centre, Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff, v Aluma Systems Corporation, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent. Burke Company, Fourth-Party Plaintiff, v Frank L. Ciminelli Construction Co., Inc., Fourth-Party Defendant-Respondent. Mobile Materials Handling Equipment, Ltd., Fourth-Party Plaintiff, v Frank L. Ciminelli Construction Co., Inc., et al., Fourth-Party Defendants-Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 239
Pages: 928–928

Head Matter:
Robert L. Rook et al., Appellants-Respondents, v 60 Key Centre, Inc., et al., Respondents. 60 Key Centre, Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff, v Aluma Systems Corporation, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent. Burke Company, Fourth-Party Plaintiff, v Frank L. Ciminelli Construction Co., Inc., Fourth-Party Defendant-Respondent. Mobile Materials Handling Equipment, Ltd., Fourth-Party Plaintiff, v Frank L. Ciminelli Construction Co., Inc., et al., Fourth-Party Defendants-Respondents.
(Appeal No. 2.)
[661 NYS2d 578]

Opinion:
Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs and motion granted. Same Memorandum as in Rook v 60 Key Centre (239 AD2d 926 [decided herewith]). (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Whelan, J.—Preclusion.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Balio, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.