Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. William H. STANLEY, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1997-02-25
Citations: 941 S.W.2d 668
Docket Number: No. 69793
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. William H. STANLEY, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 941
Pages: 668–668

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. William H. STANLEY, Defendant/Appellant.
No. 69793.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Feb. 25, 1997.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 31, 1997.
Dave Hemingway, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for defendanVappellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Jacquelyn K. Hamra, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for plaintiff/respondent.
Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals after he was convicted by a jury of one count of possession of a controlled substance, § 195.202, RSMo 1994. The court found defendant to be a prior offender and sentenced him to a prison term of four years. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).