Case Name: VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS et, Plaintiff-Appellants, v. SWEENEY, Sheriff et, Defendant-Appellee
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1952-06-23
Citations: 64 Ohio Law Abs. 288
Docket Number: No. 22457
Parties: VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS et, Plaintiff-Appellants, v. SWEENEY, Sheriff et, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: (HUNSICKER, PJ, DOYLE, J, of the 9th District; METCALF, J, of the 4th District, sitting by designation in the 8th District.)
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 64
Pages: 288–288

Head Matter:
VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS et, Plaintiff-Appellants, v. SWEENEY, Sheriff et, Defendant-Appellee.
Ohio Appeals, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County.
No. 22457.
Decided June 23, 1952.
(HUNSICKER, PJ, DOYLE, J, of the 9th District; METCALF, J, of the 4th District, sitting by designation in the 8th District.)
Phillip Bartell, Cleveland, for plaintiff-appellants.
Saul S. Danaceau, Roland Baskin, Cleveland, for defendantappellee.

Opinion:
OPINION
By THE COURT:
This is an action for declaratory judgment, whereby plaintiffs sought to have their rights determined in the operation of a "Bingo" game and to restrain the defendants from interfering with the operation thereof.
Defendants demurred to the amended petition, which demurrer was sustained by the Common Pleas Court and the amended petition was dismissed. From this judgment the appeal stands on questions of law.
The parties were favored with an exhaustive and well written opinion by the trial court, and this court adopts the reasoning and conclusions therein reached. See also: Driskill v. City of Cincinnati, 66 Oh Ap 372, and that part of Borchard's Declaratory Judgments, page 40, quoted with approval on page 375 of the Driskill case.
None of the four separate assignments of error are well made; there is no prejudicial error herein, and the judgment is affirmed. Exceptions noted. Order see journal.
HUNSICKER, PJ, DOYLE, J, METCALF, J, concur.