Case Name: MICHAEL HURLEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. THE CITY OF TRENTON ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1902-03-03
Citations: 67 N.J.L. 350
Docket Number: 
Parties: MICHAEL HURLEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. THE CITY OF TRENTON ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 67
Pages: 350–351

Head Matter:
MICHAEL HURLEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. THE CITY OF TRENTON ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR.
Argued December 4 and 5, 1901
Decided March 3, 1902.
On error to the Supreme Court.
For the plaintiffs in error, Charles E. Bird and John Rellstab.
For the defendant in error, James J. Cahill and John H. Backes.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Mr. Justice Fort. 37 Vroom 538.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Collins, Hendrickson, Pitney, Krueger, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees. 11
For reversal — Garretson, Vroom. 2.