Case Name: The State ex rel. Carr, Appellant, v. McDonnell, Judge, et al., Appellees
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2009-12-01
Citations: 124 Ohio St. 3d 62
Docket Number: No. 2009-1020
Parties: The State ex rel. Carr, Appellant, v. McDonnell, Judge, et al., Appellees.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 124
Pages: 62–63

Head Matter:
The State ex rel. Carr, Appellant, v. McDonnell, Judge, et al., Appellees.
[Cite as State ex rel. Carr v. McDonnell, 124 Ohio St.3d 62, 2009-Ohio-6165.]
(No. 2009-1020
Submitted November 18, 2009
Decided December 1, 2009.)

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment dismissing the complaint of appellant, Leonard F. Carr, for a writ of prohibition to prevent appellee Judge John P. O'Donnell of the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas from exercising jurisdiction in Carr v. Acacia Country Club Co., Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas case No. CV-635329, and Carr v. Acacia Country Club Co., Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas case No. CV-682363, and a writ of mandamus to command appellees Judge Nancy McDonnell and Judge Eileen A. Gallagher of that court to transfer those cases from the commercial docket of Judge O'Donnell to the docket of Judge Nancy M. Russo.
{¶ 2} Judge O'Donnell does not patently and unambiguously lack jurisdiction to proceed in these cases. See Temp.Sup.R. 1.03 and 1.04; Sup.R. 4(B) and 36. Carr has an adequate remedy by way of appeal from Judge O'Donnell's rulings in the cases to raise his claim that Judge O'Donnell was improperly assigned to them. See Keith v. Bobby, 117 Ohio St.3d 470, 2008-Ohio-1443, 884 N.E.2d 1067, ¶ 14; State ex rel. Key v. Spicer (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 469, 746 N.E.2d 1119 ("a claim of improper assignment of a judge can generally be adequately raised by way of appeal"); State ex rel. Berger v. McMonagle (1983), 6 Ohio St.3d 28, 30, 6 OBR 50, 451 N.E.2d 225 (mandamus and prohibition are not substitutes for appeal to contest alleged improper assignment of judge).
Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Leonard F. Carr, L. Bryan Carr, and Robert P. DeMarco, for appellant.
Benesch, Friedlander, Copian & Aronoff, L.L.P., Robert A. Zimmerman, and Mark D. Tucker, for appellees.