Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leroy Maurice DEVEAUX, a/k/a Leroy Dover, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-03-04
Citations: 313 F. App'x 595
Docket Number: No. 08-7117
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leroy Maurice DEVEAUX, a/k/a Leroy Dover, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 313
Pages: 595–596

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leroy Maurice DEVEAUX, a/k/a Leroy Dover, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-7117.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 26, 2009.
Decided: March 4, 2009.
Leroy Maurice Deveaux, Appellant Pro Se. William Kenneth Witherspoon, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, SC, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. .
Unpublished opinions are not binding-precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Leroy Maurice Deveaux appeals from the district court's orders granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence based on the crack cocaine amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines and denying reconsideration. The district court reduced Deveaux's sentence to the minimum of the amended Guidelines range. Deveaux asserts that the district court erred in failing to further reduce his sentence. Deveaux's argument is foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir.2009). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's orders. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED