Case Name: WILLIAM E. BEECHAM, Respondent, v. C. Y. BURNS, City Clerk, Appellant
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1917-10-04
Citations: 34 Cal. App. 804
Docket Number: Civ. No. 2388
Parties: WILLIAM E. BEECHAM, Respondent, v. C. Y. BURNS, City Clerk, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports
Volume: 34
Pages: 804–804

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 2388.
Second Appellate District.
October 4, 1917.]
WILLIAM E. BEECHAM, Respondent, v. C. Y. BURNS, City Clerk, Appellant.
Election Law—Certification of Recall Petition.—Judgment affirmed on the authority of Beecham, v. Bums, ante, p. 754.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Curtis D. Wilbur, Judge.
The facts are similar to those stated in Beecham v. Burns, ante, p. 754, [168 Pac. 1058].
Charles W. Lyon, and Fredericks & Hanna, for Appellant.
Roy A. Linn, Muhleman & Crump, and William M. Humphreys, for Respondent.

Opinion:
THE COURT.
This is said to be an action to compel appellant, as city clerk of the city of Venice, to certify to the sufficiency of a certain recall petition for the recall of one Carlos L. Smart, a trustee of that city. In all respects necessary to be considered for the purposes of a decision, this case is like No. 2387, Beecham v. Burns, ante, p. 754, [168 Pac. 1058], in which our decision is this day filed. Upon the authority of that decision, the judgment in this action is affirmed.