Case Name: Lowell Lamb & Company, Inc., Respondent, v. Albert Herskovits et al., Copartners under the Firm Name of Albert Herskovits & Son, Appellants
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1924-05-13
Citations: 238 N.Y. 572
Docket Number: 
Parties: Lowell Lamb & Company, Inc., Respondent, v. Albert Herskovits et al., Copartners under the Firm Name of Albert Herskovits & Son, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 238
Pages: 572–573

Head Matter:
Lowell Lamb & Company, Inc., Respondent, v. Albert Herskovits et al., Copartners under the Firm Name of Albert Herskovits & Son, Appellants.
Appeal — reversal by Appellate Division and direction for entry of interlocutory judgment —■ appeal to Court of Appeals dismissed.
Lamb & Co., Inc., v. Herskovits & Son, 204 App. Div. 407, appeal dismissed.
(Argued April 14, 1924;
decided May 13, 1924.)
Appeal from a judgment, entered March 23,1923, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, reversing a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term and directing entry of an interlocutory judgment in favor of plaintiff and appointing a referee to compute and report the amount of plaintiff’s damages.
Isidor E. Schlesinger, Robert E. Tinsley and Harry J. Moskowitz for appellants.
Louis Joffe and Joseph Joffe for respondent.

Opinion:
Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ. Not sitting: Lehman, J.