Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sergio MONTES-RAMIREZ, a.k.a. Sergio Ramirez, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-06-27
Citations: 581 F. App'x 652
Docket Number: No. 13-10684
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sergio MONTES-RAMIREZ, a.k.a. Sergio Ramirez, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 581
Pages: 652–653

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sergio MONTES-RAMIREZ, a.k.a. Sergio Ramirez, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-10684.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 25, 2014.
Filed June 27, 2014.
Lynnette Carleen Kimmins, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Matthew J. McGuire, Patagonia, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: HAWKINS, TALLMAN, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Sergio Montes-Ramirez appeals from the district court's judgment and challenges the 12-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Montes-Ramirez contends that the district court procedurally erred by basing his sentence on the clearly erroneous factual determination that his prior conviction was a sexual offense. We review for plain error, see United States v. Valencia-Barragan, 608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th Cir.2010), and find none. The record reflects that the court expressly declined to characterize Montes-Ramirez's prior crime as a sexual offense and imposed the sentence on the basis of Montes-Ramirez's criminal and immigration history.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.