Case Name: Wilma Ann O'BRIEN and Patrick M. O'Brien, her husband, Appellants, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., a Delaware corporation, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-12-13
Citations: 684 So. 2d 306
Docket Number: No. 96-00193
Parties: Wilma Ann O’BRIEN and Patrick M. O’Brien, her husband, Appellants, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., a Delaware corporation, Appellee.
Judges: ALTENBERND and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 684
Pages: 306–306

Head Matter:
Wilma Ann O’BRIEN and Patrick M. O’Brien, her husband, Appellants, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., a Delaware corporation, Appellee.
No. 96-00193.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Dec. 13, 1996.
Charles J. Morachnick and Desma L. West, Seminole, and Elizabeth P. Weimer, Clearwater, for Appellants.
Vincent M. D’Assaro and Hunter A. Hall of D’Assaro and Hall, P.A., Maitland, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PATTERSON, Acting Chief Judge.
In this slip-and-fall action, the trial court granted final summary judgment in favor of Wal-Mart. We reverse.
A defendant moving for summary judgment in a negligence case must show that there is no negligence or that the sole proximate cause of the injury was the negligence of the plaintiff. To establish that there was no negligence, Wal-mart must demonstrate that it owed no duty to Mrs. O'Brien or that it did not breach a duty which it owed. See Bryant v. Lucky Stores, Inc., 577 So.2d 1347 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). Because there are material issues of fact in this regard which the trier of fact must resolve, we reverse the final summary judgment and remand for further proceedings.
. Reversed and remanded.
ALTENBERND and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.