Case Name: Keyse G. JAMA, Appellee, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General of the United States, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-03-25
Citations: 362 F.3d 1117
Docket Number: No. 04-1127
Parties: Keyse G. JAMA, Appellee, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General of the United States, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 362
Pages: 1117–1118

Head Matter:
Keyse G. JAMA, Appellee, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General of the United States, Appellant.
No. 04-1127.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
March 25, 2004.
Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied May 19, 2004.
Jeffrey John Keyes, Kevin M. Magnu-son, Briggs & Morgan, Minneapolis, MN, for Petitioner-Appellee.
Keyse G. Jama, Minnesota Correctional Facility, Rush City, MN, pro se.
Lonnie F. Bryan, Asst. U.S. Attorney, Minneapolis, MN, David J. Kline, Christine A. Bither, Greg D. Mack, Washington, DC, for Respondent-Appellant.
Judge Bye would grant the petition for rehearing en banc.

Opinion:
JUDGMENT
The district court's judgment ordering the release of petitioner under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is reversed because the district court erred in concluding that "there is no significant likelihood of removal in the reasonably foreseeable future." See Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 701, 121 S.Ct. 2491, 150 L.Ed.2d 653 (2001). The United States Supreme Court has granted certio-rari in Mr. Jama's immigration case, and we believe that the Court will decide the case in a reasonable time and that it would be wrong to conclude that there is no significant likelihood that the government will prevail.