Case Name: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, et al., Defendants-Appellants
Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1991-08-07
Citations: 586 So. 2d 1390
Docket Number: No. 90-60
Parties: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: Before STOKER, LABORDE and KNOLL, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 586
Pages: 1390–1390

Head Matter:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
No. 90-60.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.
Aug. 7, 1991.
Raligh Newman, Lake Charles, for plaintiff s-appellees.
Stockwell, Sievert, Viccellio, Clements & Shaddock, David L. Bateman, Lake Charles, for defendants-appellants.
Raggio, Cappel, Chozen & Berniard, Thomas L. Raggio, Lake Charles, for defendant-appellee — Sopac.
Before STOKER, LABORDE and KNOLL, JJ.

Opinion:
STOKER, Judge.
This is a companion suit to Corbello v. Southern Pacific Transportation Company, 586 So.2d 1383 (La.App. 3d Cir.1991). For the reasons assigned in Corbello v. Southern Pacific Transportation Company, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. Costs of this appeal are assessed one-half to plaintiffs-appellees and one-half to defendant-appellant.
AFFIRMED.
KNOLL, J., concurs and assigns written reasons.