Case Name: UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS, et al., Petitioners, v. U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION and the United States of America, Respondents, Nuclear Utility Backfitting and Reform Group, Intervenor. (Two Cases)
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1988-10-18
Citations: 859 F.2d 237
Docket Number: Nos. 85-1757, 86-1219
Parties: UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS, et al., Petitioners, v. U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION and the United States of America, Respondents, Nuclear Utility Backfitting and Reform Group, Intervenor. (Two Cases)
Judges: Before WALD, Chief Judge, ROBINSON, MIKVA, EDWARDS, RUTH B. GINSBURG, STARR, SILBERMAN, BUCKLEY, WILLIAMS, D.H. GINSBURG and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 859
Pages: 237–240

Head Matter:
UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS, et al., Petitioners, v. U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION and the United States of America, Respondents, Nuclear Utility Backfitting and Reform Group, Intervenor. (Two Cases)
Nos. 85-1757, 86-1219.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Oct. 18, 1988.
William C. Parler, Gen. Counsel, William H. Briggs, Jr., Sol., E. Leo Slaggie, Deputy Sol., G. Paul Bollwerk, III and Steven F. Crockett, Attys., U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Com’n, and Peter R. Steenland, Jr., Chief, Appellate Section and Mark Haag, Atty., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D.C., were on the suggestion for rehearing.

Opinion:
ON RESPONDENTS' SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
Before WALD, Chief Judge, ROBINSON, MIKVA, EDWARDS, RUTH B. GINSBURG, STARR, SILBERMAN, BUCKLEY, WILLIAMS, D.H. GINSBURG and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Respondents' suggestion for rehearing en banc has been circulated to the full Court. The taking of a vote thereon was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the Court in regular active service did not vote in favor of the suggestion. Upon consideration of the foregoing it is
ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the suggestion is denied.
A dissenting statement of Circuit Judge STARR, joined by Circuit Judges WILLIAMS, D.H. GINSBURG and SENTELLE, is attached.
Circuit Judge SILBERMAN did not participate in this matter.