Case Name: STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Glenn Michael TUPICA, Appellee; STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Linda Ellen McCRANIE and Ramona Bantle, Appellees; STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Glenn Michael TUPICA, Linda Ellen McCranie, and Randi Lou Carhart, Appellees; STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Glenn Michael TUPICA, Ramona Bantle and Linda Ellen McCranie, Appellees; STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Glenn Michael TUPICA, Appellee; STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Rayno Oliver HONKA, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1983-06-08
Citations: 432 So. 2d 738
Docket Number: Nos. 82-1811, 82-1836 to 82-1838, 82-2005 and 82-2111
Parties: STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Glenn Michael TUPICA, Appellee. STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Linda Ellen McCRANIE and Ramona Bantle, Appellees. STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Glenn Michael TUPICA, Linda Ellen McCranie, and Randi Lou Carhart, Appellees. STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Glenn Michael TUPICA, Ramona Bantle and Linda Ellen McCranie, Appellees. STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Glenn Michael TUPICA, Appellee. STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Rayno Oliver HONKA, Appellee.
Judges: DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and HERSEY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 432
Pages: 738–738

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Glenn Michael TUPICA, Appellee. STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Linda Ellen McCRANIE and Ramona Bantle, Appellees. STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Glenn Michael TUPICA, Linda Ellen McCranie, and Randi Lou Carhart, Appellees. STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Glenn Michael TUPICA, Ramona Bantle and Linda Ellen McCranie, Appellees. STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Glenn Michael TUPICA, Appellee. STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Rayno Oliver HONKA, Appellee.
Nos. 82-1811, 82-1836 to 82-1838, 82-2005 and 82-2111.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
June 8, 1983.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James P. McLane, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Philip J. Padovano, Tallahassee, and Richard B. Mateer, P.A., Boca Raton, for appel-lees Tupica and Carhart.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Shedd v. State, 358 So.2d 1117 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 83 S.Ct. 407, 9 L.Ed.2d 441 (1963).
DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and HERSEY, JJ., concur.