Case Name: STATE of Missouri ex rel. Steven BARNETT, Appellant, v. John DOE and Jane Doe, Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-09-07
Citations: 143 S.W.3d 655
Docket Number: No. ED 84349
Parties: STATE of Missouri ex rel. Steven BARNETT, Appellant, v. John DOE and Jane Doe, Respondents.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 143
Pages: 655–655

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri ex rel. Steven BARNETT, Appellant, v. John DOE and Jane Doe, Respondents.
No. ED 84349.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Sept. 7, 2004.
Jean Huff, Ellisville, MO, for appellant.
Steven Barnett, Pro Se Appellant.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Steven Barnett appeals from the trial court's judgment dismissing his criminal complaint because it was not signed by the Prosecuting Attorney or Attorney General.
We have reviewed Barnett's brief and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No errors of law appear. An extended opinion reciting the facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. Judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).