Case Name: STATE OF FLORIDA, for the Use and Benefit of WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY, a division of Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WESLEY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1972-02-01
Citations: 453 F.2d 1366
Docket Number: No. 30693
Parties: STATE OF FLORIDA, for the Use and Benefit of WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY, a division of Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WESLEY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 453
Pages: 1366–1367

Head Matter:
STATE OF FLORIDA, for the Use and Benefit of WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY, a division of Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WESLEY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 30693.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Feb. 1, 1972.
Richard E. Reckson, Eugene C. Hei-man, of Heiman & Crary, Miami, Fla., for plaintiff-appellant.
Martin E. Segal, Donald W. Stobs, Jr., Wesley G. Carey, Edward A. Perse, Patton, Kanner, Nadeau, Segal & Stobs, Miami, Fla., for defendants-appellees Wesley and Aetna.
Before TUTTLE, WISDOM and IN-GRAHAM, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
We are in agreement with the well considered memorandum opinion of the district court, State of Florida v. Wesley Construction Company, 316 F.Supp. 490 (S.D.Fla., 1970), and its judgment is affirmed.