Case Name: CALLADAY v. McKINSEY et al.
Court: United States Circuit Court for the District of Ohio
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1850-07
Citations: 4 F. Cas. 1073
Docket Number: 
Parties: CALLADAY v. McKINSEY et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Cases
Volume: 4
Pages: 1073–1073

Head Matter:
Case No. 2,318.
CALLADAY v. McKINSEY et al.
[5 McLean, 166.]
Circuit Court, D. Ohio.
July Term, 1850.
Practice — Continuance.
Swan & Andrews, for plaintiff.
Mr. Thurman, for defendant.
[Reported by Hon. John McLean, Circuit Justice.]

Opinion:
Since the commencement of this suit, the defendant, who claims under a tax title, filed his bill in the state court against the lessor of the plaintiff, a non-resident, and by publication, procured a decree of the title, no notice being given to the party nor his counsel in the case, of which the defendant had full notice. With the view of reversing this decree in the state-court, the counsel for plaintiff moved a continuance.
On the facts stated, the court continued the cause.