Case Name: Morris KING, Employee/Appellant, v. COUNTY DISPOSAL, INC., Employer/Respondent, and State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., Insurer/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1994-06-21
Citations: 877 S.W.2d 719
Docket Number: No. 65379
Parties: Morris KING, Employee/Appellant, v. COUNTY DISPOSAL, INC., Employer/Respondent, and State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., Insurer/Respondent.
Judges: Before GRIMM, P.J., and CARL R. GAERTNER and AHRENS, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 877
Pages: 719–719

Head Matter:
Morris KING, Employee/Appellant, v. COUNTY DISPOSAL, INC., Employer/Respondent, and State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., Insurer/Respondent.
No. 65379.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
June 21, 1994.
Harry James Nichols, St. Louis, for appellant.
James B. Kennedy, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before GRIMM, P.J., and CARL R. GAERTNER and AHRENS, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant-Employee appeals the award of the Labor and Industrial Commission contending the award of worker's compensation benefits for permanent partial disability and for unpaid medical expenses was inadequate. The Commission's award was supported by competent and substantial evidence. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information setting forth the reasons for which the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's award is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).