Case Name: Emerson A. Phelps, Resp't, v. The Metropolitan El. R. Co. and The Manhattan R. Co., App'lts
Court: New York Superior Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1892-01-11
Citations: 42 N.Y. St. Rep. 958
Docket Number: 
Parties: Emerson A. Phelps, Resp’t, v. The Metropolitan El. R. Co. and The Manhattan R. Co., App’lts.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 42
Pages: 958–959

Head Matter:
Emerson A. Phelps, Resp’t, v. The Metropolitan El. R. Co. and The Manhattan R. Co., App’lts.
Appeal from a judgment entered upon the report of a referee.
Davies & Sapallo, for app’lts; B. M. Felt, for resp’t.

Opinion:
McAdam, J.
The judgment restrains the defendants from maintaining the elevated railway structure in front of the premises known as No. 94 Sixth avenue, unless the defendants, within a time specified, pajr the plaintiff $1,200 for a release of the'easement and $400 damages. The evidence satisfactorily sustains the findings of the referee and warrants the judgment rendered. _ No errors were committed during the trial which require a reversal, and the judgment appealed from must he affirmed, with costs.
Freedman and Gildersleeve, JJ., concur.