Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Scott Reed WILLIAMSON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-09-29
Citations: 447 F. App'x 507
Docket Number: No. 11-6588
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Scott Reed WILLIAMSON, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 447
Pages: 507–508

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Scott Reed WILLIAMSON, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 11-6588.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 13, 2011.
Decided: Sept. 29, 2011.
Scott Reed Williamson, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Scott Reed Williamson appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 8582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Williamson, No. 1:02-cr-00192-WLO-2 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 31, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.