Case Name: Schenley Industries, Inc., Respondent, et al., Plaintiff, v. Martini & Rossi Corporation et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants. (And a Third-Party Action.)
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1989-04-04
Citations: 73 N.Y.2d 987
Docket Number: 
Parties: Schenley Industries, Inc., Respondent, et al., Plaintiff, v Martini & Rossi Corporation et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants. (And a Third-Party Action.)
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 73
Pages: 987–987

Head Matter:
Schenley Industries, Inc., Respondent, et al., Plaintiff, v Martini & Rossi Corporation et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants. (And a Third-Party Action.)
Submitted January 30, 1989;
decided April 4, 1989

Opinion:
Motion for leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as affirmed the dismissal of the third-party complaint against Meshulam Riklis denied; motion for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the remainder of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.