Case Name: Leland M. HOAGLAND, petitioner, Appellant, v. STATE of Minnesota, Respondent
Court: Minnesota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Minnesota
Decision Date: 1995-11-02
Citations: 539 N.W.2d 392
Docket Number: No. C3-95-563
Parties: Leland M. HOAGLAND, petitioner, Appellant, v. STATE of Minnesota, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: North Western Reporter 2d
Volume: 539
Pages: 392–392

Head Matter:
Leland M. HOAGLAND, petitioner, Appellant, v. STATE of Minnesota, Respondent.
No. C3-95-563.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
Nov. 2, 1995.
Mark D. Nyvold, Special Assistant State Public Defender, St. Paul, for Appellant.
Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Minnesota Attorney General, St. Paul, Michael 0. Freeman, Hennepin County Attorney, Beverly J. Wolfe, Assistant County Attorney, Minneapolis, for Respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the order of the district court dated March 2,1995, denying defendant, Leland M. Hoagland, a new trial after a remand hearing pursuant to Hoagland v. State, 518 N.W.2d 531 (Minn. 1994) be, and the same is, affirmed. The trial court on remand concluded, on the basis of detailed findings, that the state had met its burden of proving that the state would be unduly prejudiced by having to retry the case. Affirmed.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Alan C. Page Alan C. Page Associate Justice