Case Name: Al Raino, Respondent, v. Dominick C. Valardo, Appellant; Betty McCullough, Respondent, v. Dominick C. Valardo, Appellant; Ambrose Curley, Respondent, v. Dominick C. Valardo, Appellant; William Curley, Respondent, v. Dominick C. Valardo, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1930-01
Citations: 228 A.D. 730
Docket Number: 
Parties: Al Raino, Respondent, v. Dominick C. Valardo, Appellant. Betty McCullough, Respondent, v. Dominick C. Valardo, Appellant. Ambrose Curley, Respondent, v. Dominick C. Valardo, Appellant. William Curley, Respondent, v. Dominick C. Valardo, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 228
Pages: 730–730

Head Matter:
Al Raino, Respondent, v. Dominick C. Valardo, Appellant. Betty McCullough, Respondent, v. Dominick C. Valardo, Appellant. Ambrose Curley, Respondent, v. Dominick C. Valardo, Appellant. William Curley, Respondent, v. Dominick C. Valardo, Appellant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The summons was served April 5, 1928. There was no extension of time to serve the complaint and no attempt to serve until January 11, 1929. At that time defendant refused to accept service. On the record here to delay application for leave to serve the complaint until October 19, 1929, was inexcusable. The order should not have been granted. Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman, Davis, Whitmyer and Hasbrouck, JJ., concur. Order reversed, on the law and facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.