Case Name: In re: BRADLEES STORES, INC., Debtor, LEADING MANUFACTURER PTE. LTD., Tung Mung Textile Co(S) PTE. Ltd., Lekim Textile Industries PTE. Ltd., and Maxlin Garments SDN. BHD., Appellants, v. BRADLEES STORES, INC., Bradlees, Inc., and New Horizons of Yonkers, Inc. Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-10-17
Citations: 78 F. App'x 166
Docket Number: No. 03-5007
Parties: In re: BRADLEES STORES, INC., Debtor, LEADING MANUFACTURER PTE. LTD., Tung Mung Textile Co(S) PTE. Ltd., Lekim Textile Industries PTE. Ltd., and Maxlin Garments SDN. BHD., Appellants, v. BRADLEES STORES, INC., Bradlees, Inc., and New Horizons of Yonkers, Inc. Appellees.
Judges: Present: MESKILL, KATZMANN, and RAGGI, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Bankruptcy Reporter
Volume: 301
Pages: 166–166

Head Matter:
In re: BRADLEES STORES, INC., Debtor, LEADING MANUFACTURER PTE. LTD., Tung Mung Textile Co(S) PTE. Ltd., Lekim Textile Industries PTE. Ltd., and Maxlin Garments SDN. BHD., Appellants, v. BRADLEES STORES, INC., Bradlees, Inc., and New Horizons of Yonkers, Inc. Appellees.
No. 03-5007.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Oct. 17, 2003.
Robert E. Michael, Robert E. Michael & Associates PLLC, New York, New York, for Appellants.
Adam C. Rogoff, John H. Bae, Nathan A. Haynes, Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, New York, New York, for Ap-pellees.
Present: MESKILL, KATZMANN, and RAGGI, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
SUMMARY ORDER
This cause came to be heard on the record from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and was submitted by counsel for appellants and appellee.
ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Pauley's Memorandum and Order, dated January 9, 2003.
We have considered all of appellant's contentions on this appeal and have found them to be without merit. The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.