Case Name: Luis STABINSKI, et al., Appellants, v. CLEMDOR ENTERPRISES, INC., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-01-29
Citations: 574 So. 2d 1134
Docket Number: No. 90-638
Parties: Luis STABINSKI, et al., Appellants, v. CLEMDOR ENTERPRISES, INC., Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and FERGUSON and COPE, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 574
Pages: 1134–1134

Head Matter:
Luis STABINSKI, et al., Appellants, v. CLEMDOR ENTERPRISES, INC., Appellee.
No. 90-638.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan. 29, 1991.
Rehearing Denied March 19, 1991.
Stabinski & Funt, Mark L. Goldman, for appellants.
Therrel Baisden & Meyer Weiss and Bruce E. Lazar and Cindy S. Vova, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and FERGUSON and COPE, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The trial court's construction of the parties' agreement as to each of the two particulars involved in this case is supported by the record. We are therefore bound to affirm the judgment below. Clark v. Clark, 79 So.2d 426 (Fla.1955); Hodder v. Hodder, 414 So.2d 9 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Pershing Industs., Inc. v. Shupnick, 325 So.2d 410 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976), cert. denied, 330 So.2d 21 (Fla.1976); Rylander v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 302 So.2d 478 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974).