Case Name: Franciene Hofmann, Respondent, v. Max H. Hofmann et al., Defendants, and Sunwood Homes, Inc., et al., Appellants. (Eleven other actions.)
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1940-07-24
Citations: 283 N.Y. 730
Docket Number: 
Parties: Franciene Hofmann, Respondent, v. Max H. Hofmann et al., Defendants, and Sunwood Homes, Inc., et al., Appellants. (Eleven other actions.)
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 283
Pages: 730–731

Head Matter:
Franciene Hofmann, Respondent, v. Max H. Hofmann et al., Defendants, and Sunwood Homes, Inc., et al., Appellants. (Eleven other actions.)
Argued June 10, 1940;
decided July 24, 1940.
Louis Rivkin and Jay Leo Rothschild for appellants.
Arthur H. Ellis and L. Edward Masin for respondents.

Opinion:
Judgments modified by striking out the provision for reformation of the deeds and, as modified, affirmed, with costs to the respondents. The representations contained in the advertisements coupled with the oral representations entitle the plaintiffs to injunctive relief against the defendants but furnish no ground for the reformation of the contract. No opinion.
Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Finch, Rippey, Sears and Conway, JJ. Taking no part: Lewis, J.