Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Walter Ernesto ESCOBAR-MENDOZA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-02-24
Citations: 606 F. App'x 159
Docket Number: No. 14-40796
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Walter Ernesto ESCOBAR-MENDOZA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before DAVIS, ELROD, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 606
Pages: 159–160

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Walter Ernesto ESCOBAR-MENDOZA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 14-40796
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Feb. 24, 2015.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, H. Michael Sokolow, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before DAVIS, ELROD, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Walter Ernesto Eseobar-Mendoza raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Rodriguez-Escareno, 700 F.3d 751, 753-54 (5th Cir. 2012), which held that the sentence en hancement provided for in U.S.S.G. , § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(i) applies to a conviction for the federal crime of conspiracy to commit a federal drug trafficking offense. The unopposed motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cm. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under tire limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.