Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jack DOUGLAS, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2011-05-31
Citations: 341 S.W.3d 820
Docket Number: No. WD 72288
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jack DOUGLAS, Appellant.
Judges: Before: MARK D. PFEIFFER, P.J., and THOMAS H. NEWTON and ALOK AHUJA, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 341
Pages: 820–820

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jack DOUGLAS, Appellant.
No. WD 72288.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
May 31, 2011.
Dorothy L. Savory, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
Timothy A. Blackwell, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before: MARK D. PFEIFFER, P.J., and THOMAS H. NEWTON and ALOK AHUJA, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Jack Douglas was convicted of driving with a revoked driver's license. He appeals, arguing that the trial court committed reversible error by allowing hearsay statements into evidence, and that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel due to his attorney's failure to object to certain hearsay statements. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).