Case Name: Steven HAYWOOD, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2017-11-14
Citations: 544 S.W.3d 249
Docket Number: No. ED 104883
Parties: Steven HAYWOOD, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 544
Pages: 249–250

Head Matter:
Steven HAYWOOD, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 104883
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Filed: November 14, 2017
Randall Brachman, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Movant/Appellant.
Dora A. Fichter, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent/Respondent.
Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Steven Haywood appeals from the motion court's judgment denying, following an evidentiary hearing, his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.15. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. 2015, unless otherwise indicated.