Case Name: State v. Barton
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2006-06-22
Citations: 109 Ohio St. 3d 1510
Docket Number: 2003-2036
Parties: State v. Barton.
Judges: O’Donnell, J., would deny the motion to schedule a competency evaluation.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 109
Pages: 1510–1510

Head Matter:
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS
June 22, 2006
[Cite as 06/22/06 Case Announcements, 2006-Ohio-3140.]
MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS
2003-2036.
State v. Barton.

Opinion:
Warren App. No. 03CR20526. This cause came on for further consideration of appellant's motion to schedule a competency evaluation to determine whether the defendant is competent to waive further appeals and his request for a stay of execution so that the competency evaluation can be completed. Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause is remanded to the Court of Common Pleas of Warren County for the following limited purpose:
The court of common pleas is directed to promptly hold an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the defendant's competency to waive further appeals should be psychiatrically evaluated. The court shall further determine whether such decision was voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently made. The trial court should consider any matters reflecting on the defendant's competency submitted by the defense counsel or the state.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that, as soon as the court of common pleas has conducted this evidentiary hearing and made the appropriate findings of fact, the court of common pleas should announce its ruling. Should the trial court rule that a competency evaluation ought to be conducted, R.C. 2945.371, Section (B) should be followed for appointing an examiner to conduct the evaluation; Section (F) should be followed in directing the examiner to consider "all relevant evidence" in completing the evaluation; and Section (G) should be followed for the format and timeframe for the completion of the examiner's report. Any examiner appointed by the trial court should apply the test set forth in State v. Berry (1995), 74 Ohio St.3d 1504, 659 N.E.2d 796, in conducting the psychiatric evaluation. At all times during this limited remand, this court shall retain jurisdiction of this cause. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the appellant's motion for a stay of execution is denied.
O'Donnell, J., would deny the motion to schedule a competency evaluation.