Case Name: SCHICK v. CINCINNATI (City); Imbus v. Same; and Hull v. Same
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1926-07-29
Citations: 4 Ohio Law Abs. 739
Docket Number: Nos. 20022-23-24
Parties: SCHICK v. CINCINNATI (City) Imbus v. Same and Hull v. Same
Judges: 
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 4
Pages: 739–739

Head Matter:
SCHICK v. CINCINNATI (City) Imbus v. Same and Hull v. Same
Nos. 20022-23-24.
Supreme Court
Dock. July 29, 1926;
4 Abs. 525.
Attorneys — W. J. Schick for plaintiffs herein; E. F. Alexander and C. S. Bell for City; all of Cincinnati.

Opinion:
_ The question herein involved is a constitutional one relating to the interpretation of 4227-2-3 GC. relative to ordinances and resolutions that are subject to referendum.