Case Name: James A. KUOL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2010-10-26
Citations: 323 S.W.3d 99
Docket Number: No. WD 71222
Parties: James A. KUOL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Division I: JAMES M. SMART, JR., Presiding Judge, and MARK D. PFEIFFER and CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Judges.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 323
Pages: 99–99

Head Matter:
James A. KUOL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 71222.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Oct. 26, 2010.
S. Kathleen (Kate) Webber, Assistant Appellate Defender, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Richard A. Starnes, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before Division I: JAMES M. SMART, JR., Presiding Judge, and MARK D. PFEIFFER and CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Judges.

Opinion:
Order
PER CURIAM:
Appellant, James A. Kuol, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing in the Circuit Court of Clay County. Kuol argues that his plea counsel was constitutionally ineffective. We disagree and affirm in this per curiam order and have provided the parties a memorandum of law explaining our ruling today. Rule 84.16(b).