Case Name: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Stanley
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1996-01-10
Citations: 74 Ohio St. 3d 218
Docket Number: No. 95-1672
Parties: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Stanley.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 74
Pages: 218–221

Head Matter:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Stanley.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Stanley (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 218.]
(No. 95-1672
Submitted September 27, 1995
Decided January 10, 1996.)
Geoffrey Stem, Disciplinary Counsel, and Sally Ann Steuk, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Upon review of the record, we concur in the board's findings that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(5), 1-102(A)(6), and 6-101(A)(3), as well as Gov.Bar R. V(9)(D), V(4)(G), and VI. We also agree with the sanction recom mended for this misconduct. Respondent is therefore permanently disbarred from the practice of law in Ohio.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.