Case Name: In re The Marriage of Frederick O. BAKER, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Lela V. BAKER, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1989-10-03
Citations: 778 S.W.2d 9
Docket Number: No. 55521
Parties: In re The Marriage of Frederick O. BAKER, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Lela V. BAKER, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 778
Pages: 9–9

Head Matter:
In re The Marriage of Frederick O. BAKER, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Lela V. BAKER, Respondent/Respondent.
No. 55521.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Southern Division.
Oct. 3, 1989.
Herbert A. Kasten, Jr., Ste. Genevieve, for petitioner/appellant.
Raymond A. Bruntrager, St. Louis, for respondent/respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from the trial court's judgment in a motion to modify a dissolution decree. The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo.banc 1976).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).