Case Name: James Lisk GADDY, Appellant, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1982-06-18
Citations: 416 So. 2d 836
Docket Number: No. AH-293
Parties: James Lisk GADDY, Appellant, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION, Appellee.
Judges: SHIVERS, J., and CAWTHON, VICTOR M., Associate Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 416
Pages: 836–837

Head Matter:
James Lisk GADDY, Appellant, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION, Appellee.
No. AH-293.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
June 18, 1982.
Rehearing Denied July 26, 1982.
James Lisk Gaddy, pro se.
Catherine L. Dickson, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Tallahassee, for appellee.

Opinion:
MILLS, Judge.
We affirm the Commission's determination of Gaddy's presumptive parole release date (PPRD). The record reveals that Gad-dy was advised of the aggravating factors used in determining his PPRD and he signed the examiner's report.
There was no error in aggravating Gaddy's PPRD for multiple separate offenses even if he was given concurrent sentences. Florida Administrative Code Rule 23-19.01(5); Florida Administrative Code Rule 23-19.01(5), note 7.
Also, there was no error in classifying Gaddy's offense as a "Category VI, Greatest (Most Serious — I)," because "If an offense can be classified under more than one category, the most serious applicable category is to be used." Florida Administrative Code Rule 23-19.05, note 3.
SHIVERS, J., and CAWTHON, VICTOR M., Associate Judge, concur.