Case Name: Antonio WOODSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-07-13
Citations: 998 S.W.2d 815
Docket Number: No. 74749
Parties: Antonio WOODSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before JAMES A. PUDLOWSKI, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and ROBERT E. CRIST, Senior Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 998
Pages: 815–816

Head Matter:
Antonio WOODSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 74749.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
July 13, 1999.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Sept. 1, 1999.
Deborah B. Wafer, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Krista D. Boston, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before JAMES A. PUDLOWSKI, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and ROBERT E. CRIST, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant appeals denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. He was convicted after a jury trial of first degree robbery, section 569.020, RSMo 1994, two counts of first degree assault, section 565.050, RSMo 1994, and two counts of armed criminal action, section 571.015, RSMo 1994. Mov-ant was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to five concurrent terms of twenty years imprisonment. Movant alleges his trial counsel was ineffective in failing to call witnesses.
The findings of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).