Case Name: In the Matter of Lucot, Inc., Appellant, v. Hortense W. Gabel, as City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator, Respondent; In the Matter of Natken Realty Corp., Appellant, v. Hortense W. Gabel, as City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator, Respondent; In the Matter of Jerome R. Jakubovitz, Doing Business under the Name of J. R. J. Management Co., Appellant, v. Hortense W. Gabel, as City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator, Respondent; In the Matter of Jerome R. Jakubovitz, Doing Business under the Name of J. R. J. Management Co., Appellant, v. Hortense W. Gabel, as City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1965-02-04
Citations: 15 N.Y.2d 774
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Lucot, Inc., Appellant, v. Hortense W. Gabel, as City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator, Respondent. In the Matter of Natken Realty Corp., Appellant, v. Hortense W. Gabel, as City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator, Respondent. In the Matter of Jerome R. Jakubovitz, Doing Business under the Name of J. R. J. Management Co., Appellant, v. Hortense W. Gabel, as City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator, Respondent. In the Matter of Jerome R. Jakubovitz, Doing Business under the Name of J. R. J. Management Co., Appellant, v. Hortense W. Gabel, as City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 15
Pages: 774–776

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Lucot, Inc., Appellant, v. Hortense W. Gabel, as City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator, Respondent. In the Matter of Natken Realty Corp., Appellant, v. Hortense W. Gabel, as City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator, Respondent. In the Matter of Jerome R. Jakubovitz, Doing Business under the Name of J. R. J. Management Co., Appellant, v. Hortense W. Gabel, as City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator, Respondent. In the Matter of Jerome R. Jakubovitz, Doing Business under the Name of J. R. J. Management Co., Appellant, v. Hortense W. Gabel, as City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator, Respondent.
Argued January 12, 1965;
decided February 4, 1965.
Bernard Buchwald, Harry Bigman, Barry A. Tessler and Peter P. Kenny for appellants.
Beatrice Shainswit for respondent.
Robert E. Herman and Jack Sobell for Division of Housing and Community Renewal, amicus curiœ.
Joseph G. Blum and Louis Haimoff for Picon Holding Corporation and others, amici curiœ.

Opinion:
In each proceeding: Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi and Bergan.