Case Name: Richardson, Appellant, v. Frick Company, Inc.
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1938-01-31
Citations: 329 Pa. 148
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 73
Parties: Richardson, Appellant, v. Frick Company, Inc.
Judges: Before Kephart, C. J., Schaefer, Maxey, Drew, Linn and Stern, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 329
Pages: 148–149

Head Matter:
Richardson, Appellant, v. Frick Company, Inc.
Argued January 12, 1938.
Before Kephart, C. J., Schaefer, Maxey, Drew, Linn and Stern, JJ.
Abraham, Wernielc, for appellant.
Wármele Potter Scott, Knot» Henderson and Ballard, Spahr, Andrews & Ingersoll, for appellee, were not heard.
January 31, 1938:

Opinion:
Per Curiam,
We are all agreed that the action of the court below in entering judgment n. o. v. was correct. Appellant's evidence failed to establish a commission contract with appellee. A review of the record shows that all the testimony of appellant is utterly inconsistent with the existence of the alleged contract. As the parties alone are interested in the facts, it is unnecessary to detail the evidence and their contentions.
Judgment affirmed.