Case Name: Larry James GRANT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-05-08
Citations: 561 So. 2d 11
Docket Number: No. 89-782
Parties: Larry James GRANT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before NESBITT, BASKIN and GODERICH, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 561
Pages: 11–12

Head Matter:
Larry James GRANT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 89-782.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 8, 1990.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Joseph C. Brock, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Angelica D. Zayas, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before NESBITT, BASKIN and GODERICH, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Larry James Grant appeals his convictions and sentences for three counts of armed robbery. We affirm the convictions, but reverse and remand for resentencing.
We find no merit in Grant's challenges to his convictions. Medina v. State, 466 So.2d 1046 (Fla.1985); Borges v. State, 459 So.2d 459 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Nelson v. State, 395 So.2d 176 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); Eichholz v. Pepo Petroleum Co., Inc., 475 So.2d 1244 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 476 So.2d 673 (Fla.1985), review denied, 484 So.2d 8 (Fla.1986); State v. Coney, 272 So.2d 550 (Fla. 1st DCA), cert. discharged, 294 So.2d 82 (Fla.1973). We agree, however, that the trial court erred in departing from the recommended sentencing guidelines without providing written reasons, Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla.1990), and resentencing within the guidelines is required on remand. Pope.
Convictions affirmed; remanded for re-sentencing.