Case Name: ANN LOY ORIGINAL, INC., a Delaware Corporation; Ann Loy Last, an individual, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent, Coldwater Creek, Inc., Real Party in Interest
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-03-12
Citations: 5 F. App'x 746
Docket Number: No. 00-71072; D.C. No. CV-98-07592-FMC(Anx)
Parties: ANN LOY ORIGINAL, INC., a Delaware Corporation; Ann Loy Last, an individual, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent, Coldwater Creek, Inc., Real Party in Interest.
Judges: Before BROWNING, BRUNETTI, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 5
Pages: 746–746

Head Matter:
ANN LOY ORIGINAL, INC., a Delaware Corporation; Ann Loy Last, an individual, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent, Coldwater Creek, Inc., Real Party in Interest.
No. 00-71072.
D.C. No. CV-98-07592-FMC(Anx).
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted March 7, 2001.
Decided March 12, 2001.
Before BROWNING, BRUNETTI, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
Petitioner Ann Loy, Original, Inc. ("ALO") has not satisfied the requirements for mandamus to issue. See Bauman v. United States Dist. Court., 557 F.2d 650, 654-55 (9th Cir.1977). ALO is free to pursue its motion for reconsideration in the district court and therefore has other adequate means of relief. Moreover, ALO has not established, for the purposes of mandamus relief, that the district court clearly erred as a matter of law. The absence of this factor "will always defeat a petition for mandamus." Calderon v. United States Dist. Court., 163 F.3d 530, 534 (9th Cir.1998) (en banc).
Petition DENIED.