Case Name: CITY OF ATLANTA v. HOTELS.COM, L.P. et al.
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 2009-06-01
Citations: 298 Ga. App. 144
Docket Number: A07A1376
Parties: CITY OF ATLANTA v. HOTELS.COM, L.P. et al.
Judges: Blackburn, P. J., and Doyle, J., concur.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 298
Pages: 144–145

Head Matter:
A07A1376.
CITY OF ATLANTA v. HOTELS.COM, L.P. et al.
(679 SE2d 382)
Decided June 1, 2009.
Pope, McGlamry, Kilpatrick, Morrison & Norwood, Charles N. Pope, R. Timothy Morrison, Powell Goldstein, John R. Bielema, Jr., Jerry L. DeLoach, for appellant.

Opinion:
BERNES, Judge.
In City of Atlanta v. Hotels.com, L.P., 288 Ga. App. 391 (654 SE2d 166) (2007), we affirmed the trial court's dismissal of this case based on the City of Atlanta's failure to exhaust available administrative remedies. However, in City of Atlanta v. Hotels.com, L.P., 285 Ga. 231 (674 SE2d 898) (2009), the Supreme Court of Georgia vacated the judgment of this Court and held that the City of Atlanta's claim for declaratory judgment regarding the applicability of the City's Hotel or Motel Occupancy Tax Ordinance, § 146-76 et seq., to online travel companies should not have been dismissed by the trial court based on the City's failure to exhaust administrative remedies, but instead should have been resolved on its merits. Accordingly, our prior judgment is vacated, the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this Court, and we remand the case to the trial court with the direction that it adjudicate the City's claim for declaratory judgment as to the applicability of the Hotel or Motel Occupancy Tax Ordinance.
Judgment vacated and case remanded with direction.
Blackburn, P. J., and Doyle, J., concur.
Bondurant, Mixson & Elmore, Emmet J. Bondurant, Jones Day, Edward K. Smith, for appellees.
Susan J. Moore, Ted C. Baggett, amici curiae.