Case Name: Louis Berger, Appellant, v. Max Cohen, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1908-02
Citations: 124 A.D. 928
Docket Number: 
Parties: Louis Berger, Appellant, v. Max Cohen, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 124
Pages: 928–928

Head Matter:
Louis Berger, Appellant, v. Max Cohen, Respondent.

Opinion:
In the absence of express stipulation on the subject, the parties must be deemed to have intended that the delivery of the plans by the plaintiff and the payment therefor by the defendant should be concurrent acts. The plaintiff proved the preparation of the plans and a tender thereof to the defendant upon payment of the plaintiff's services therefor. The defense of non-performance was, therefore; not available. (Scott v. Miller, 114 App. Div. 6.) Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event. Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.