Case Name: James Antonio SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2016-08-23
Citations: 504 S.W.3d 101
Docket Number: No. ED 103172
Parties: James Antonio SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 504
Pages: 101–101

Head Matter:
James Antonio SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 103172
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Filed: August 23, 2016
Timothy Forneris, Missouri Public Defender Office, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Nathan J. Aquino, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
James Antonio Smith appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an eviden-tiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).