Case Name: Frederick Hamilton BANKS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles RATLEDGE; Mark Hornak; David Hicton; Robert Cessar; United States Marshals Service; Jefferson B. Sessions III, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-02-02
Citations: 710 F. App'x 177
Docket Number: No. 17-7355
Parties: Frederick Hamilton BANKS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles RATLEDGE; Mark Hornak; David Hicton; Robert Cessar; United States Marshals Service; Jefferson B. Sessions III, Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 710
Pages: 177–177

Head Matter:
Frederick Hamilton BANKS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles RATLEDGE; Mark Hornak; David Hicton; Robert Cessar; United States Marshals Service; Jefferson B. Sessions III, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 17-7355
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: January 30, 2018
Decided: February 2, 2018
Frederick Hamilton Banks, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Frederick Hamilton Banks appeals the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition, as well as its Order denying Banks' self-styled . motion to vacate that order and judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's orders. See Banks v. Ratledge, No. 5:16-hc-02219-D (E.D.N.C. Aug. 14, 2017 & Oct. 10, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED