Case Name: Rodney SHARP, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-08-28
Citations: 53 S.W.3d 252
Docket Number: No. ED 78706
Parties: Rodney SHARP, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 53
Pages: 252–253

Head Matter:
Rodney SHARP, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 78706.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Aug. 28, 2001.
Mary S. Choi, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Susan L. Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for Respondent.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Rodney Sharp, appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24 .035 mo tion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. He contends his plea attorney provided ineffective assistance by failing to investigate a motion to suppress. Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2001, unless otherwise indicated.