Case Name: SAVE NORTH BAY VILLAGE, etc., et al., Appellants, v. Beatris M. ARGUELLES, City Clerk, and the City of North Bay Village, Gabrielle Nashtessler, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1998-10-01
Citations: 718 So. 2d 365
Docket Number: No. 98-2322
Parties: SAVE NORTH BAY VILLAGE, etc., et al., Appellants, v. Beatris M. ARGUELLES, City Clerk, and the City of North Bay Village, Gabrielle Nashtessler, Appellees.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and GERSTEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 718
Pages: 365–366

Head Matter:
SAVE NORTH BAY VILLAGE, etc., et al., Appellants, v. Beatris M. ARGUELLES, City Clerk, and the City of North Bay Village, Gabrielle Nashtessler, Appellees.
No. 98-2322.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 1, 1998.
Geller, Geller, Garfinkel and Fisher and Joseph S. Geller, Hollywood; Sale & Kuehne and Benedict P. Kuehne, Miami, for appellants.
Nagin, Gallop and Figueredo and Earl G. Gallop, Miami; David H. Nevel, Miami Beach, for appellees.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and GERSTEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Upon the conclusion that the trial court correctly upheld the validity of the amendment to the North Bay Village City charter approved by the electorate on May 12, 1998, which clarified and arguably expanded an existing restriction on term limits for members of the City Commission, see Burdick v. Takushi 504 U.S. 428, 112 S.Ct. 2059, 119 L.Ed.2d 245 (1992); Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General — Limited Political Terms, 592 So.2d 225 (Fla.1991); Miami Heat Ltd. Partnership v. Leahy, 682 So.2d 198 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Myers v. Hawkins, 362 So.2d 926, 934 n. 28 (Fla.1978), the judgment under review is
Affirmed.