Case Name: Dwayne DELESTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Warden Mildred RIVERA, Federal Correctional Institution Estill; Carlton, Federal Correctional Institution Estill Camp Administrator; Lieutenant Yates; Lieutenant Bowen; Lieutenant Vincent; Lieutenant Buckler; Chief of Security Captain Norm, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-06-06
Citations: 474 F. App'x 118
Docket Number: No. 12-6280
Parties: Dwayne DELESTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Warden Mildred RIVERA, Federal Correctional Institution Estill; Carlton, Federal Correctional Institution Estill Camp Administrator; Lieutenant Yates; Lieutenant Bowen; Lieutenant Vincent; Lieutenant Buckler; Chief of Security Captain Norm, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 474
Pages: 118–119

Head Matter:
Dwayne DELESTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Warden Mildred RIVERA, Federal Correctional Institution Estill; Carlton, Federal Correctional Institution Estill Camp Administrator; Lieutenant Yates; Lieutenant Bowen; Lieutenant Vincent; Lieutenant Buckler; Chief of Security Captain Norm, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 12-6280.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 31, 2012.
Decided: June 6, 2012.
Dwayne Deleston, Appellant Pro Se.
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Dwayne Deleston appeals the district court's order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Deleston v. Rivera, No. 6:11-cv-02968-DCN, 2012 WL 135416 (D.S.C. Jan. 17, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.