Case Name: Juan ECHEVARRIA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1984-07-31
Citations: 454 So. 2d 680
Docket Number: Nos. 83-582, 83-583
Parties: Juan ECHEVARRIA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HENDRY and FERGUSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 454
Pages: 680–680

Head Matter:
Juan ECHEVARRIA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Nos. 83-582, 83-583.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 31, 1984.
Rehearing Denied Sept. 10, 1984.
Hutner & Abramson and Stuart Abram-son, Coral Gables, and Bennet Lapidus, Miami, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Carolyn M. Snurkowski, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HENDRY and FERGUSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Having carefully considered the record in this consolidated criminal appeal, the briefs, and the arguments of counsel, we conclude that the errors raised as issues on appeal are either harmless errors, United States v. Hastings, 461 U.S. 499, 103 S.Ct. 1974, 76 L.Ed.2d 96 (1983); Drake v. State, 441 So.2d 1079 (Fla.1983); Palmes v. State, 397 So.2d 648 (Fla.1981), or were not preserved for appellate review by contemporaneous objection below. Sims v. State, 444 So.2d 922 (Fla.1983); Wilson v. State, 436 So.2d 908 (Fla.1983); Steinhorst v. State, 412 So.2d 332 (Fla.1982).
Affirmed.