Case Name: Theodore Thomas WAGNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Angle Smith; Fnu Lnu, Inmate, unknown at this time, Plaintiffs, v. CHARLESTON COUNTY JAIL; Unknown Officers, in their individual and official capacities, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-07-28
Citations: 192 F. App'x 229
Docket Number: No. 06-6252, 06-6354
Parties: Theodore Thomas WAGNER, Plaintiff — Appellant, and Angle Smith; Fnu Lnu, Inmate, unknown at this time, Plaintiffs, v. CHARLESTON COUNTY JAIL; Unknown Officers, in their individual and official capacities, Defendants— Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 192
Pages: 229–230

Head Matter:
Theodore Thomas WAGNER, Plaintiff — Appellant, and Angle Smith; Fnu Lnu, Inmate, unknown at this time, Plaintiffs, v. CHARLESTON COUNTY JAIL; Unknown Officers, in their individual and official capacities, Defendants— Appellees.
No. 06-6252, 06-6354.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 19, 2006.
Theodore Thomas Wagner, Appellant Pro Se. Hugh Willcox Buyck, Darren K. Sanders, Buyck Law Firm, Charleston, South Carolina; Robert Gerald Chambers, Jr., Turner & Padgett, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Theodore Thomas Wagner appeals the magistrate judge's order denying his motion for an extension of time to serve process on unidentified Defendants and the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge and the district court. Wagner v. Charleston County Jail, No. 3:05-cv-01435-GRA (D.S.C. filed Jan. 9, 2006 & entered Jan. 10, 2006; filed Feb. 2, 2006 & entered Feb. 3, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED