Case Name: David WICHERN, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Leesa STUCKEY, Cross-Petitioner/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-01-25
Citations: 10 S.W.3d 596
Docket Number: No. ED 75775
Parties: David WICHERN, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Leesa STUCKEY, Cross-Petitioner/Respondent.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 10
Pages: 596–596

Head Matter:
David WICHERN, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Leesa STUCKEY, Cross-Petitioner/Respondent.
No. ED 75775.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Jan. 25, 2000.
Thomas J. Piatchek, St. Louis, for appellant.
Gale L. Toko, St. Louis, for respondent Stuckey.
Robert N. Hamilton, Kruse, Reinker & Hamilton, L.L.C., Clayton, for respondent guardian ad litem.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Father appeals from the trial court's judgment denying his motion to modify the custody provisions of a paternity judgment and granting mother's cross-motion to modify. The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. Murphy v. Carrón, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).
No jurisdictional purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).