Case Name: Leo J. DOLAN, Jr. and Cherie M. Dolan, H/W, v. HURD MILLWORK COMPANY, INC., Bentley Homes, Ltd., Garvin Mitchell Corporation, Chadwell Associates, L.P., Chadwell Realty, Inc., Harrison Community Association, Petition of: Leo J. Dolan, Jr.
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2017-09-11
Citations: 170 A.3d 1040
Docket Number: No. 168 MAL 2017
Parties: Leo J. DOLAN, Jr. and Cherie M. Dolan, H/W, v. HURD MILLWORK COMPANY, INC., Bentley Homes, Ltd., Garvin Mitchell Corporation, Chadwell Associates, L.P., Chadwell Realty, Inc., Harrison Community Association, Petition of: Leo J. Dolan, Jr.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 170
Pages: 1040–1040

Head Matter:
Leo J. DOLAN, Jr. and Cherie M. Dolan, H/W, v. HURD MILLWORK COMPANY, INC., Bentley Homes, Ltd., Garvin Mitchell Corporation, Chadwell Associates, L.P., Chadwell Realty, Inc., Harrison Community Association, Petition of: Leo J. Dolan, Jr.
No. 168 MAL 2017
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
September 11, 2017

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 11th day of September, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issues, rephrased for clarity, are:
(1) What is the proper role of an appellate court in reviewing a non-jury decision where it deems the Pa. R.A.P. 1925(a) opinion inadequate but the trial judge is no longer available to provide a supplemental opinion?
(2) If the appellate court is required to reach the merits of the trial court's decision, what are the appropriate scope and standard of review?