Case Name: Shareef JADALLAH, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-11-22
Citations: 177 S.W.3d 866
Docket Number: No. ED 85473
Parties: Shareef JADALLAH, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 177
Pages: 866–866

Head Matter:
Shareef JADALLAH, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 85473.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Nov. 22, 2005.
Lisa M. Stroup, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Deborah Daniels, Shaun J. Mackel-prang, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Shareef Jadallah, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by coercing him into testifying at trial.
The motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).