Case Name: Israel CUEVAS-ALARCON, Petitioner v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-07-02
Citations: 608 F. App'x 433
Docket Number: No. 14-2283
Parties: Israel CUEVAS-ALARCON, Petitioner v. Loretta E. LYNCH Respondent.
Judges: Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 608
Pages: 433–434

Head Matter:
Israel CUEVAS-ALARCON, Petitioner v. Loretta E. LYNCH Respondent.
No. 14-2283.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: June 29, 2015.
Filed: July 2, 2015.
Daniel Vondra, Cole & Vondra, Iowa City, IA, for Petitioner.
Jessica Dawgert, Karen Yolanda Drum-mond, Carl H. Mcintyre, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
. Loretta E. Lynch has been appointed to serve as Attorney General of the United States, and is substituted as respondent pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Israel Cuevas-Alarcon petitions for review of an order issued by the Department of Homeland Security reinstating a prior removal order against him. For reversal, Cuevas-Alarcon argues that the reinstate ment violates due process because the underlying removal order is legally deficient. This challenge is not properly before us: the prior removal order "is not subject to being reopened or reviewed," see 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a)(5), and Cuevas-Alarcon has not raised any colorable constitutional or legal claim appropriate for appellate review, see Molina Jerez v. Holder, 625 F.3d 1058, 1062, 1067-68 (8th Cir.2010) (describing limited appellate jurisdiction to review reinstatement order; mere recitation of constitutional or legal terms is insufficient to invoke jurisdiction).
Accordingly, the petition is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.