Case Name: John H. Wiegman et al., Appellants, v. Ichitaro Morimura et al., Respondents
Court: New York City Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1894
Citations: 9 Misc. 715
Docket Number: 
Parties: John H. Wiegman et al., Appellants, v. Ichitaro Morimura et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 9
Pages: 715–715

Head Matter:
John H. Wiegman et al., Appellants, v. Ichitaro Morimura et al., Respondents.
Appeal from a judgment in favor of defendants.
Ten Eyck & Remington, for appellants.
Lehmaier & Williams, for respondents.

Opinion:
Fitzsimons, J.
The trial justice was right in dismissing the complaint.
There is no evidence showing that the defendants in any way were responsible for the acts of the constable.
It does not appear that the levy made by him was instigated or suggested by the defendants or any other person acting for them; besides, it does not appear that the plaintiffs were copartners, a necessary thing to be shown in this case because of the allegation in the complaint that plaintiffs are copartners and its denial by the defendants' answer.
For these and the other reasons which- induced the trial 'justice to dismiss the complaint the judgment must be affirmed, with costs.
Conlan, J., concurs.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.