Case Name: The City National Bank of Hackensack, New Jersey, respondent, v. Antonetta Di Napoli, appellant
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1929-05-20
Citations: 104 N.J. Eq. 494
Docket Number: 
Parties: The City National Bank of Hackensack, New Jersey, respondent, v. Antonetta Di Napoli, appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 104
Pages: 494–494

Head Matter:
The City National Bank of Hackensack, New Jersey, respondent, v. Antonetta Di Napoli, appellant.
[Decided May 20th, 1929.]
Messrs. Hart & Venderwart, for the respondent.
Messrs. Wright, Vander Burgh & McCarty, for the appellant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis, and reported in 101 N. J. Eq. 392.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Teenchaed, Paekeb, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Deae, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.