Case Name: CITY OF DARDENNE PRAIRIE, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. CORA BOPP LIMITED PARTNERSHIP et al., Defendants/Appellants
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2010-09-07
Citations: 323 S.W.3d 64
Docket Number: No. ED 93590
Parties: CITY OF DARDENNE PRAIRIE, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. CORA BOPP LIMITED PARTNERSHIP et al., Defendants/Appellants.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J. and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 323
Pages: 64–65

Head Matter:
CITY OF DARDENNE PRAIRIE, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. CORA BOPP LIMITED PARTNERSHIP et al., Defendants/Appellants.
No. ED 93590.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Sept. 7, 2010.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 13, 2010.
Application for Transfer Denied Nov. 16, 2010.
Patricia Harrison, Kevin M. O’Keefe, Stephanie E. Karr, Co-Counsel, Clayton, MO, for Appellant.
David Taylor Hamilton, Nicholas Komo-roski, Hazelwood & Weber, St. Charles, MO, for Respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J. and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The City of O'Fallon appeals from the trial court's judgment entered upon a consent judgment between the City of Dard-enne Prairie and the Cora Bopp Limited Partnership (the Partnership) involving the determination of competing annexation claims over property owned by the Partnership.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value or serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).