Case Name: Bennie Lee PEARSON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-04-08
Citations: 616 So. 2d 49
Docket Number: No. 80488
Parties: Bennie Lee PEARSON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 616
Pages: 49–49

Head Matter:
Bennie Lee PEARSON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 80488.
Supreme Court of Florida.
April 8, 1993.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Sheryl J. Lowenthal, Special Appointed Public Defender, Coral Gables, for petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Charles M. Fahlbusch, Asst. Atty. Gen., Hollywood, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have for review Pearson v. State, 603 So.2d 676 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), based on express and direct conflict with Lamont v. State, 610 So.2d 435 (Fla.1992). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. The opinion below is quashed to the extent it is inconsistent with Lamont and remanded for reconsideration.
It is so ordered.
BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.