Case Name: Ethel WORK, Appellant, v. The GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC., a corporation, and Ideal Mutual Insurance Company, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1981-05-21
Citations: 398 So. 2d 1016
Docket Number: No. YY-462
Parties: Ethel WORK, Appellant, v. The GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC., a corporation, and Ideal Mutual Insurance Company, Appellees.
Judges: ERVIN, J., and LILES, WOODIE A. (Retired), and PEARSON, TILLMAN (Retired), Associate Judges, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 398
Pages: 1016–1017

Head Matter:
Ethel WORK, Appellant, v. The GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC., a corporation, and Ideal Mutual Insurance Company, Appellees.
No. YY-462.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
May 21, 1981.
Charles J. Kahn, Jr., and R. P. Warfield, Pensacola, for appellant.
Robert P. Gaines, and David T. Johnson, Jr., Pensacola, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Our examination of the record shows that the nonexistence of genuine issues of material fact has not been established, and the entry of the summary judgment for. Appel-lees was in error. See Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
ERVIN, J., and LILES, WOODIE A. (Retired), and PEARSON, TILLMAN (Retired), Associate Judges, concur.