Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Augustus Charles BOBO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1981-08-03
Citations: 652 F.2d 453
Docket Number: Nos. 80-7100, 80-7238
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Augustus Charles BOBO, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 652
Pages: 453–453

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Augustus Charles BOBO, Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 80-7100, 80-7238
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Unit B
Aug. 3, 1981.
Augustus Charles Bobo, pro se.
Bill L. Barnett, Asst. U. S. Atty., Birmingham, Ala., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, KRAV-ITCH and HATCHETT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The district court correctly denied appellant's motion to vacate sentence, 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Appellant was tried and convicted under the same indictment involved in U. S. v. Kennington, 650 F.2d 544 (1981), and the decision in that case controls this case.
As in Kennington, the district court must amend the sentence to delete the special parole term imposed under 21 U.S.C. § 846. Bifulco v. U. S., 447 U.S. 381, 100 S.Ct. 2247, 65 L.Ed.2d 205 (1980). At the same time in the judgment of conviction the court should delete the erroneous reference to 21 U.S.C. § 341 because appellant contends this reference causes difficulty with the parole board.
AFFIRMED with instructions.