Case Name: OLIVE H. ADAMS vs. DAVID C. ADAMS
Court: Connecticut Superior Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1936-09-22
Citations: 4 Conn. Supp. 154
Docket Number: File #50020
Parties: OLIVE H. ADAMS vs. DAVID C. ADAMS
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Supplement
Volume: 4
Pages: 154–155

Head Matter:
OLIVE H. ADAMS vs. DAVID C. ADAMS
Superior Court New Haven County
File #50020
Present: Hon. NEWELL JENNINGS, Judge.
Lyman H. Steele, Attorney for the Plaintiff.
MEMORANDUM FILED SEPTEMBER 22, 1936.

Opinion:
JENNINGS, J.
The case of Davis vs. Davis, 119 Conn. 194, cited to sustain the plaintiff's contention, is not in point. That case turned upon the existence or non-existence of an intent to be married. The facts in that case showed conclusively that no such intent existed.
That is not the situation here. The parties were infatuated with each other, talked over the idea of getting married beforehand, and deliberately decided on the step which they subsequently carried out. It is a clear case of married in haste, repent at leisure.
The complaint is dismissed.