Case Name: State of Florida, Respondent, and Van Bennett, as Intervening Respondent, Appellants, v Hillsborough County, Florida, Chas. T. Friend, Oscar Ayala, John T. Gunn, E. R. Crum and W. T. Williams, Constituting the Board of County Commissioners of Hillsborough County, Florida, in and on Behalf as Well as for and on Behalf of East Tampa Special Road District Number 2, Hillsborough County, Florida, Appellees
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1925-04-21
Citations: 89 Fla. 378
Docket Number: 
Parties: State of Florida, Respondent, and Van Bennett, as Intervening Respondent, Appellants, v Hillsborough County, Florida, Chas. T. Friend, Oscar Ayala, John T. Gunn, E. R. Crum and W. T. Williams, Constituting the Board of County Commissioners of Hillsborough County, Florida, in and on Behalf as Well as for and on Behalf of East Tampa Special Road District Number 2, Hillsborough County, Florida, Appellees.
Judges: West, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Browne, Terrell and Strum, J. J., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 89
Pages: 378–378

Head Matter:
State of Florida, Respondent, and Van Bennett, as Intervening Respondent, Appellants, v Hillsborough County, Florida, Chas. T. Friend, Oscar Ayala, John T. Gunn, E. R. Crum and W. T. Williams, Constituting the Board of County Commissioners of Hillsborough County, Florida, in and on Behalf as Well as for and on Behalf of East Tampa Special Road District Number 2, Hillsborough County, Florida, Appellees.
En Banc.
Decision Filed April 21, 1925.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; L. L. Parks, Judge.
Chas. B. Parhhill and 8. 8. Sandford, for Appellants;
Mabry, Reaves & Carlton, for Appellees.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.
West, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Browne, Terrell and Strum, J. J., concur.