Case Name: Joseph E. MACON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James M. COX, Jr., Judge; H. Lowery, Attorney; The City of Williamston, North Carolina; State of South Carolina, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-03-28
Citations: 172 F. App'x 555
Docket Number: No. 05-7371
Parties: Joseph E. MACON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James M. COX, Jr., Judge; H. Lowery, Attorney; The City of Williamston, North Carolina; State of South Carolina, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 172
Pages: 555–556

Head Matter:
Joseph E. MACON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James M. COX, Jr., Judge; H. Lowery, Attorney; The City of Williamston, North Carolina; State of South Carolina, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 05-7371.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 23, 2006.
Decided March 28, 2006.
Joseph E. Macon, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Joseph E. Macon appeals the district court's order accepting the recommenda tion of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Macon v. Cox, No. CA-04-1311-6-HFF (D.S.C. June 22, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED