Case Name: Mrs. Edna Latil NICHOLS, Appellant, v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1962-12-11
Citations: 310 F.2d 704
Docket Number: No. 19645
Parties: Mrs. Edna Latil NICHOLS, Appellant, v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 310
Pages: 704–704

Head Matter:
Mrs. Edna Latil NICHOLS, Appellant, v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY, Appellee.
No. 19645.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 11, 1962.
Erwin A. LaRose, Arthur Cobb, Baton Rouge, La., for appellant.
Edward W. Gray, J. H. Percy, Jr., Baton Rouge, La., Percy, Maemurdo & Gray, Baton Rouge, La., for Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co.
Before RIVES, CAMERON and BELL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant having failed to object to the argument now contended to having been prejudicial, and no plain error or abdication of function by the District Judge appearing, the judgment appealed from is affirmed. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Reid, 5th Cir., 1935, 76 F.2d 30; Louisiana & Arkansas Ry. Co. v. Johnson, 5th Cir., 1954, 214 F.2d 290, cert. den. 1954, 348 U.S. 875, 75 S.Ct. 111, 99 L.Ed. 688; Ford v. United Gas Corp., 5th Cir., 1958, 254 F.2d 817, cert. den. 358 U.S. 824, 79 S.Ct. 40, 3 L.Ed.2d 64.