Case Name: DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES; Boll Weevil Eradication Foundation of Florida, Inc.; and Southeastern Boll Weevil Eradication Foundation, Inc., Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. Roy WARD, J.W. Bauldree, Willie H. Jones, Joe Jones, and Jimmy Jones, Appellees, Cross-Appellants
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-07-17
Citations: 603 So. 2d 33
Docket Number: Nos. 91-03660 and 91-03661
Parties: DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES; Boll Weevil Eradication Foundation of Florida, Inc.; and Southeastern Boll Weevil Eradication Foundation, Inc., Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. Roy WARD, J.W. Bauldree, Willie H. Jones, Joe Jones, and Jimmy Jones, Appellees, Cross-Appellants.
Judges: ERVIN, BOOTH and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 603
Pages: 33–34

Head Matter:
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES; Boll Weevil Eradication Foundation of Florida, Inc.; and Southeastern Boll Weevil Eradication Foundation, Inc., Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. Roy WARD, J.W. Bauldree, Willie H. Jones, Joe Jones, and Jimmy Jones, Appellees, Cross-Appellants.
Nos. 91-03660 and 91-03661.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
July 17, 1992.
Rehearing Denied Sept. 2, 1992.
James R. Kelly, Office of Gen. Counsel, Tallahassee, for appellant/cross-appellee Dept, of Agriculture and Consumer Services.
Robert A. Tucker and Robert L. White, White, Tucker & Cleaves, P.A., Memphis, Tenn., and Roy V. Andrews, Lindsay, Andrews &. Leonard, P.A., Milton, for appellants/cross-appellees Boll Weevil Eradication Foundation of Florida, Inc., and Southeastern Boll Weevil Eradication Foundation, Inc.
C. Thomas Holland, Crestview, for appel-lees/cross-appellants.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This cause is before us on appeal and cross appeal from a nonfinal order holding section 593.114, Florida Statutes (1991), unconstitutional. After entry of the order below, the Legislature amended section 593.114, Florida Statutes. This amendment purportedly affects the basis of the trial court's decision and assessments involved here. Therefore, we vacate the order below holding the statute unconstitutional, and remand to the trial court for reconsideration in light of the recent amendment to section 593.114, Florida Statutes.
We find no merit in the cross appeal and affirm as to that aspect of this case.
Accordingly, the order below is affirmed in part, reversed in part, and the cause remanded for further consideration in the light hereof.
ERVIN, BOOTH and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.
. Ch. 92-23, Law of Fla. (effective March 16, 1992).