Case Name: DROTT v. BATEMAN & HARPER
Court: Hamilton County Circuit Court
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1899-01
Citations: 20 Ohio C.C. 711
Docket Number: 
Parties: DROTT v. BATEMAN & HARPER.
Judges: Before Adams, Douglass and Voorhees, JJ.
Reporter: Reports of cases argued and determined in the circuit courts of Ohio
Volume: 20
Pages: 711–711

Head Matter:
(First Circuit—Hamilton Co., O., Cir’t Court
Jan. Term, 1899.)
Before Adams, Douglass and Voorhees, JJ.
[Of the Fifth Circuit, sitting in the First Cirouit.]
DROTT v. BATEMAN & HARPER.
Partnership — Pirmname — A firmname showing the surname of the partners only is not a fictitious name within meaning of the act of February 13, 1896 (92 O.L., 25).
(See s. c., 42 B., 1, 27); Af. in Czatt v. Case, 43 W. L. B.,*77.
Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton county.
S. T. Crawford, for Plaintiff in Error.
Alfred Q. Allen, for Defendants.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
A firm name showing the surnames only of the partners, is not a fictitious name, nor a designation not showing the names of the partners within the meaning of the act of February 13, 1896, 92 O. L., 25, requiring every firm doing business under a fictitious name to file and publish a certificate showing the full names and residences of its members.