Case Name: David Epstein, Respondent, v. Nellie Goldsmith and Lewis Goldsmith, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1914-12
Citations: 165 A.D. 967
Docket Number: 
Parties: David Epstein, Respondent, v. Nellie Goldsmith and Lewis Goldsmith, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 165
Pages: 967–967

Head Matter:
David Epstein, Respondent, v. Nellie Goldsmith and Lewis Goldsmith, Appellants.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, entered on the 30th day of November, 1914, denying a motion to make the complaint more definite and certain, and to strike out certain allegations as redundant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
The order appealed from should be modified as follows: First: The complaint should be made more definite and certain; (1) paragraphs 3 and 4, by specifying with more and sufficient particularity when defendant Lewis is claimed to have fraudulently transferred the property therein described; (3) by specifying in similar manner the character of the transfers to and source of title of said Lewis to said property; (3) paragraph 8, by similarly specifying to whom the property and moneys with which the bonds were purchased belonged. Second. The entire 9th paragraph should be stricken out as irrelevant. As so modified the order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellants. ' Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Order modified as directed in opinion, and as modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellants. Order to be settled on notice.