Case Name: In re Andrew H. HUBER, Louis N. Gastinel, and Pamela J. Bjorkman
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-12-20
Citations: 160 F. App'x 972
Docket Number: No. 05-1101
Parties: In re Andrew H. HUBER, Louis N. Gastinel, and Pamela J. Bjorkman.
Judges: Before MAYER, Circuit Judge, FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and BRYSON, Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 160
Pages: 972–972

Head Matter:
In re Andrew H. HUBER, Louis N. Gastinel, and Pamela J. Bjorkman.
No. 05-1101.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Dec. 20, 2005.
Before MAYER, Circuit Judge, FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and BRYSON, Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Andrew H. Huber, Louis N. Gastinel, and Pamela J. Bjorkman appeal the decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, Ex Parte Huber, Appeal No. 07/819,040 (June 30, 2004), which affirmed the rejection of claims 24, 28, 33, and 34 as indefinite under 35 U.S.C. § 112,112; and the rejection of claims 1, 6, 16, and 22-35 as lacking an adequate written description under 35 U.S.C. § 112, 111. We affirm on the basis of the board's opinion.