Case Name: Key Bank of Southeastern New York, N. A., Respondent, v. Sidney Pal et al., as Trustees of the Tamara Trust, et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1985-04-08
Citations: 110 A.D.2d 686
Docket Number: 
Parties: Key Bank of Southeastern New York, N. A., Respondent, v Sidney Pal et al., as Trustees of the Tamara Trust, et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 110
Pages: 686–686

Head Matter:
Key Bank of Southeastern New York, N. A., Respondent, v Sidney Pal et al., as Trustees of the Tamara Trust, et al., Appellants.

Opinion:
Special Term properly granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in the sum of $166,152.03. It is uncontested that defendants owed plaintiff that sum. Furthermore, the asserted defenses of novation, accord and satisfaction, and equitable estoppel are without merit (see, Fuller v Kemp, 138 NY 231; Donemore Clothing Co. v Shapiro, 202 NYS 258; Cantasano v Courtney, 98 Misc 623; McLaughlin v Gillings, 18 Misc 56). Titone, J. P., Bracken, Rubin and Lawrence, JJ., concur.