Case Name: James Lee SHIELDS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2015-10-06
Citations: 476 S.W.3d 305
Docket Number: No. ED 102063
Parties: James Lee SHIELDS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J. and Angela T. Quigless, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 476
Pages: 305–305

Head Matter:
James Lee SHIELDS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 102063
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Filed: October 6, 2015
Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied November 25, 2015
James L. Shields — Pro Se, Potosí Correctional Center, 11593 State Highway O, Mineral Point, Missouri 63660, for Appellant.
Dora A. Fiehter, Assistant Attorney General, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102, for Respondent.
Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J. and Angela T. Quigless, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
James Shields (Movant) appeals the motion court's denial of his pro se "Re-Open Motion for Post-Conviction Relief and a Amended Motion Due to Abandonment of Counsel." Movant raises multiple arguments regarding abandonment of trial counsel and post-conviction appellate counsel, as well as his entitlement to a Rule 29.15 evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying post-conviction relief. An extended, opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. Rule 84.16(b).