Case Name: Paula M. WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-04-25
Citations: 177 F. App'x 326
Docket Number: No. 05-1221
Parties: Paula M. WILSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 177
Pages: 326–326

Head Matter:
Paula M. WILSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 05-1221.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 7, 2006.
Decided April 25, 2006.
Paula M. Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Finarelli, Ann Stone, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Paula M. Wilson appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to the Defendant and dismissing her gender discrimination claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Wilson v. North Carolina Dep't of Correction, No. CA-03-228-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 28, 2005). Additionally, as the materials contained in the "Appendix" to Wilson's informal appellate brief were not presented, in their entirety, to the district court, we grant the Defendant's motion to strike and so strike the "Appendix" from the record. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.