Case Name: Ashley KINGSMORE, Petitioner/Respondent, v. James STAUB, Respondent/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2014-10-14
Citations: 445 S.W.3d 680
Docket Number: No. ED 100842
Parties: Ashley KINGSMORE, Petitioner/Respondent, v. James STAUB, Respondent/Appellant.
Judges: Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and PHILIP M. HESS, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 445
Pages: 680–680

Head Matter:
Ashley KINGSMORE, Petitioner/Respondent, v. James STAUB, Respondent/Appellant.
No. ED 100842.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Oct. 14, 2014.
Sophya Qureshi Raza, Christopher D. Vanderbeek, Kara D. Helmuth, St. Louis, MO, for Petitioner/Respondent.
Stephen J. Bardol, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent/Appellant.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and PHILIP M. HESS, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
James Staub appeals from the trial court's judgment granting the request of Ashley Kingsmore to relocate with their minor child (Child). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the trial court was supported by substantial evidence, was not against the weight of the evidence, and did not erroneously declare or apply the law. Ratteree v. Will, 258 S.W.3d 864, 867-68 (Mo.App.E.D.2008). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil 84.16(b).