Case Name: Donna Brown KLINKA, Appellant, v. In re: ESTATE OF John E. BROWN, Appellee.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2017-11-08
Citations: 253 So. 3d 22
Docket Number: No. 3D17–510
Parties: Donna Brown KLINKA, Appellant,
v.
In re: ESTATE OF John E. BROWN, Appellee.
Judges: Before LAGOA, EMAS and SCALES, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 253
Pages: 22–22

Head Matter:
Donna Brown KLINKA, Appellant,
v.
In re: ESTATE OF John E. BROWN, Appellee.
No. 3D17-510
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Opinion filed November 8, 2017
Donna Brown Klinka, in proper person.
Stokes McMillan Antúnez, P.A., and Juan C. Antúnez; Kula & Associates, P.A., and Elliot B. Kula, W. Aaron Daniel and William D. Mueller, for appellee.
Before LAGOA, EMAS and SCALES, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (holding that, given the presumption of correctness of the trial court's ruling, where no transcript is provided to appellate court, then appellate court is unable to conclude that the trial court abused its discretion).