Case Name: Belinda WILLIAMS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-12-20
Citations: 180 S.W.3d 50
Docket Number: No. ED 85990
Parties: Belinda WILLIAMS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., BOOKER T. SHAW, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 180
Pages: 50–50

Head Matter:
Belinda WILLIAMS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 85990.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Dec. 20, 2005.
Lisa M. Stroup, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Deborah Daniels, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., BOOKER T. SHAW, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Belinda Williams, appeals from the judgment denying her Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that her trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance during cross-examination of movant's daughter.
The motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).