Case Name: NILDA HALL v. STATE OF MARYLAND
Court: Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jurisdiction: Maryland
Decision Date: 1976-12-09
Citations: 278 Md. 712
Docket Number: No. 38
Parties: NILDA HALL v. STATE OF MARYLAND
Judges: 
Reporter: Maryland Reports
Volume: 278
Pages: 712–712

Head Matter:
NILDA HALL v. STATE OF MARYLAND
[No. 38,
September Term, 1976.]
Decided December 9, 1976.
The cause was argued before Murphy, C. J., and Singley, Smith, Digges, Levine, Eldridge and Orth, JJ.
John P. Rue, II, with whom were Dorsey & Rue on the brief, for appellant.
John A. Austin, Assistant Attorney General, with whom were Francis B. Burch, Attorney General, and Clarence W. Sharp, Assistant Attorney General, on the brief, for appellee.

Opinion:
ORDER
The court having granted certiorari in the above entitled case for the limited purpose of determining whether Maryland Code (1957, 1976 Repl. Vol.), Article 27, Section 152 is unconstitutional as being in violation of Article 46 of the Maryland Declaration of Rights and otherwise in conflict with State statutes relating to discriminatory employment practices, and it now appearing that the record in this case is inadequate to permit the Court to properly consider these issues, it is this 9th day of December, 1976
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the writ of . certiorari be, and it is hereby, dismissed with, costs, petition having beén improvidently granted.