Case Name: Reginald WHITE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1991-06-28
Citations: 811 S.W.2d 68
Docket Number: No. 59368
Parties: Reginald WHITE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 811
Pages: 68–68

Head Matter:
Reginald WHITE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 59368.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
June 28, 1991.
J. Gregory Mermelstein, Columbia, for appellant.
William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Andrea K. Spillars, Millie Aulbur, Asst. Attys. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
This appeal results from the dismissal of appellant's, Reginald White's, motion for post conviction relief under Rule 24.035. Appellant sought to vacate his convictions resulting from guilty pleas to one count of burglary in the first degree, RSMo § 569.-160 (1986), and one count of rape, RSMo § 566.030 (1986), due to ineffectiveness of counsel. Appellant's motion was dismissed on grounds of untimeliness and lack of verification. We fail to find that the trial court was clearly erroneous in their dismissal of appellant's claim and therefore affirm the judgment. Day v. State, 770 S.W.2d 692, 695 (Mo. banc 1989).
We have also determined that an extended opinion would have no precedential value and affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Both parties have been furnished with a supplemental memorandum, solely for their own information, stating the reasons for this order.