Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Matthew Joseph KELLEY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-12-13
Citations: 706 F. App'x 118
Docket Number: No. 17-4447
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Matthew Joseph KELLEY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 706
Pages: 118–119

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Matthew Joseph KELLEY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 17-4447
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: December 12, 2017
Decided: December 13, 2017
Benjamin T. Stepp, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellant. Maxwell B, Cauthen, III, Assistant United ■ States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Matthew Joseph Kelley pled guilty without a written plea agreement to possession of an unregistered firearm, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5841, 5861(d) (2012), and was sentenced to 46 months in prison. Kelley appeals. His attorney has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), questioning whether the sentence is reasonable but stating that there are no meritorious issues for appeal. Kelley was advised of his right to .file a pro se brief but has not filed such a brief. We affirm.
We first conclude that Kelley's guilty plea was knowing and voluntary. Kelley stated at the Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 hearing that he was not under the influence of drugs or alcohol, was 28 years old, had an eleventh-grade education, and understood the nature of the proceedings. He expressed complete satisfaction with his attorney's services. A factual basis for the plea was presented to the court, Kelley stated that the factual basis was accurate, and he admitted his guilt. Finally, the district court complied with the requirements of Rule 11,
With respect to sentencing, the court properly calculated Kelley's Guidelines range, considered the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) (2012) sentencing factors and the arguments of the parties, and provided a sufficiently individualized assessment based on the facts of the case. We hold that the within-Guidelines sentence is procedurally and substantively reasonable. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); United States v. Carter, 564 F.3d 325, 330 (4th Cir. 2009).
Pursuant to Anders, we have reviewed the entire record and have found no meritorious issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm Kelley's conviction and sentence. This court requires that counsel inform Kelley, in writing, of the right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If Kelley requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel's motion must state that a copy thereof was served on Kelley. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED