Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Cruz REGIN-LUCANO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-02-17
Citations: 168 F. App'x 176
Docket Number: No. 04-50106
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Cruz REGIN-LUCANO, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 168
Pages: 176–177

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Cruz REGIN-LUCANO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 04-50106.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 13, 2006.
Filed Feb. 17, 2006.
Carla Bressler, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Jeremy D. Warren, Esq., Law Offices of Jeremy D. Warren, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Cruz Regin-Lucano appeals from the 46-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for importation of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 952 and 960. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
The parties agree that because the district court sentenced Regin-Lucano at a time when the United States Sentencing Guidelines were mandatory, a limited remand pursuant to United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc), is appropriate.
REMANDED. MANDATE TO ISSUE FORTHWITH.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.