Case Name: Korrol Manufacturing Co., Inc., Appellant, v. Mae Mandula, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1943-05-25
Citations: 180 Misc. 379
Docket Number: 
Parties: Korrol Manufacturing Co., Inc., Appellant, v. Mae Mandula, Respondent
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 180
Pages: 379–380

Head Matter:
Korrol Manufacturing Co., Inc., Appellant, v. Mae Mandula, Respondent
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
May 25, 1943.
Emmet L. Holbrook for appellant.
Nathan Cooper for respondent.
See, also, Mandula v. Korrol Mfg. Co., Inc., 180 Misc. 378. — [Rep.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Plaintiff established and proved a prima facie case of fraud and deceit. It was therefore error to dismiss the complaint at the end of plaintiff's case and to direct judgment for the defendant.
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event. Appeal from order dismissed.
Shientag, Rosenman and McLaughlin, JJ., concur.