Case Name: The Toledo Terminal Rd. Co., Appellant, v. Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, Appellee
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1962-03-28
Citations: 173 Ohio St. 251
Docket Number: No. 37284
Parties: The Toledo Terminal Rd. Co., Appellant, v. Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, Appellee.
Judges: Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Kerns and O’Neill, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, New Service
Volume: 173
Pages: 251–252

Head Matter:
The Toledo Terminal Rd. Co., Appellant, v. Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, Appellee.
(No. 37284
Decided March 28, 1962.)
Messrs. Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, Mr. Robert B. Gos-line and Mr. John W. Hackett, Jr., for appellant.
Mr. Mark McElroy, attorney general, Mr. DeForest Mellon, Mr. Herbert T. Maher and Mr. Andrew R. Sarisky, for appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The appellant contends that the order of the commission is unreasonable, unlawful, an abuse of discretion and contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence.
The record contains conflicting testimony and evidence supporting the contentions of both parties. Ordinarily this court will not substitute its judgment on questions of fact for that of the commission. It does not appear from an examination of the record that the order of the commission is against the manifest weight of the evidence or is otherwise unlawful or unreasonable. The order is, therefore, affirmed.
Order affirmed.
Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Kerns and O'Neill, JJ., concur.
Kerns, J., of the Second Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Herbert, J.