Case Name: Jelinek v. Abbott Laboratories
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2014-05-16
Citations: 138 Ohio St. 3d 1499
Docket Number: 2014-0481
Parties: Jelinek v. Abbott Laboratories.
Judges: 
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 138
Pages: 1499–1499

Head Matter:
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS
May 16, 2014
[Cite as 05/16/2014 Case Announcements, 2014-Ohio-2085.]
MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS
2014-0481.
Jelinek v. Abbott Laboratories.

Opinion:
Franklin App. No. 11AP-996, 2013-Ohio-1675. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal.
Upon consideration of the motion for admission pro hac vice of James F. Hurst, Derek J. Sarafa, Steffen N. Johnson, and Samantha Maxfield, it is ordered by the court that the motion is denied for failure to comply with S.Ct.Prac.R. 2.02(B)(1), which permits pro hac vice admission only on motion of the attorney seeking admission.
Counsel may file renewed motions for pro hac vice admission that comply with S.Ct.Prac.R. 2.02(B)(1) no later than 30 days from the date of this entry.