Case Name: A. P. GILBERT and W. R. KUKER v. J. H. HOWARD and A. LYON et al.
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 1909-04-07
Citations: 150 N.C. 789
Docket Number: 
Parties: A. P. GILBERT and W. R. KUKER v. J. H. HOWARD and A. LYON et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: North Carolina Reports
Volume: 150
Pages: 789–790

Head Matter:
A. P. GILBERT and W. R. KUKER v. J. H. HOWARD and A. LYON et al.
(Filed 7 April, 1909.)
In this case no error was found on appeal, and the rights of the parties were determined in a former appeal (147 N. C., 314).
Appeal by defendants from J ones, J., at October Term, 1908, of Dueham.
Fuller & Reade, Aycock & Winston and Bryant & Brogden for plaintiffs.
Bramham & Brawley for defendants.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
We agree with, counsel for appellant that the matter- involved "is largely a question of construction and interpretation of the written agreement" between the parties.
We further agree with counsel for appellees that "When this case came before the Court (147 N. C., 314) before, the contract sued on was interpreted" and the rights of the parties to it were determined.
The matters presented on this appeal are entirely of fact, and in the trial we find
No Error.