Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MITCHELL E. HUTCHINSON, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1984-02-08
Citations: 66 Or. App. 970
Docket Number: 10-82-00745; CA A28272
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MITCHELL E. HUTCHINSON, Appellant.
Judges: Before Warden, Presiding Judge, and Van Hoomissen and Young, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 66
Pages: 970–971

Head Matter:
On Court of Appeals’ own motion to dismiss,
appeal dismissed February 8,
appeal reinstated April 25, 1984 (68 Or App 57)
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MITCHELL E. HUTCHINSON, Appellant.
(10-82-00745; CA A28272)
675 P2d 1112
Edward E. Hill and Larry O. Gildea, P. C., represented appellant.
James E. Mountain, Jr., Solicitor General, and Stephen F. Peifer, Assistant Attorney General, represented respondent.
Rex Armstrong, Stephen Kanter and Charles F. Hinkle, American Civil Liberties’ Union Foundation of Oregon, Inc., Portland, amicus curiae.
Before Warden, Presiding Judge, and Van Hoomissen and Young, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
On our own motion we dismiss the appeal in this case, because we lack jurisdiction to decide it. ORS 19.023(2) (c) requires service of the notice of appeal on the trial court reporter when, as here, a transcript is designated. ORS 19.026(1) requires that service be made within 30 days after entry of the judgment appealed from. ORS 19.033(2) makes compliance with ORS 19.023 and ORS 19.026 jurisdictional and provides that compliance with those sections cannot be waived or extended. ORS 138.185(2) makes the provisions of ORS 19.033 applicable in criminal cases.
The order appealed from was entered on April 18, 1983. From defendant's motion to supplement the record, filed September 23, 1983, it appears that two court reporters were not served with either the notice or the amended notice of appeal. Because those court reporters were not served, we lack jurisdiction to consider the appeal. Custom Haro. Oregon v. Smith Truck & Tractor, 66 Or App 127, 672 P2d 1364 (1983).
Appeal dismissed.
We had previously granted appellant's motion to supplement the record to include transcripts from the two reporters not previously served. Because we now dismiss, that ruling is moot.