Case Name: Aji Paul EASWARANKUDYIL; Ninu Kurian, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. Mark J. HAZUDA, Director, Nebraska Service Center, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services; Alejandro Mayorkas, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services; Eric H. Holder, Jr., U.S. Attorney General; Rand Beers, Acting Secretary, Department Of Homeland Security, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-04-20
Citations: 600 F. App'x 254
Docket Number: No. 14-10690
Parties: Aji Paul EASWARANKUDYIL; Ninu Kurian, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. Mark J. HAZUDA, Director, Nebraska Service Center, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services; Alejandro Mayorkas, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services; Eric H. Holder, Jr., U.S. Attorney General; Rand Beers, Acting Secretary, Department Of Homeland Security, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 600
Pages: 254–254

Head Matter:
Aji Paul EASWARANKUDYIL; Ninu Kurian, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. Mark J. HAZUDA, Director, Nebraska Service Center, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services; Alejandro Mayorkas, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services; Eric H. Holder, Jr., U.S. Attorney General; Rand Beers, Acting Secretary, Department Of Homeland Security, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 14-10690
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 20, 2015.
Scott Eric Bratton, Margaret W. Wong, Margaret Wong & Associates Co., L.P.A., Cleveland, OH, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
Angie Lee Henson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Dallas, TX, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
For the reasons set forth in its Order of May 19, 2014, the district court's Final Judgment of May 19, 2014 is, in all respects, AFFIRMED. See 5th Cir. R. 47.6.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.