Case Name: Greeson v. St. Louis Union Trust Company
Court: Arkansas Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Arkansas
Decision Date: 1922-12-11
Citations: 156 Ark. 246
Docket Number: 
Parties: Greeson v. St. Louis Union Trust Company.
Judges: 
Reporter: Arkansas Reports
Volume: 156
Pages: 246–247

Head Matter:
Greeson v. St. Louis Union Trust Company.
Opinion delivered December 11, 1922.
Mortgage — foreclosure-suability of purchaser. — The liability of a purchaser at mortgage foreclosure sale for taxes due on the land depends upon whether the taxes were due on the day of sale, not the day of confirmation of the sale; the mortgagor being liable for taxes due on the former date, and the purchaser for taxes subsequently due.
Appeal from Nevada Chancery Court; James D. Shaver, Chancellor;
reversed.
McMillan £ McMillan, for 'appellants.
The purchaser should pay the taxes. Crawford & Moses’ Digest, §§ 10023, 10056; 135 Ark. 279; 123 Ark. 18; 99 Ark. 324; 77 Ark. 216; 20 Cyc. 1362; 105 Ark. 261; 53 Ark. 110; 30 Ohio St. 436.
Tompkins, McRae £ Tompkins, for appellees.
The deed was not effective until confirmed. Crawford & Moses’ Digest, § 1512; 53 Ark. 445; 34 Ark. 346; 69 Ark. 119; 127 Ark. 153; Jones on Mortgages (7th ed.) 1661, 1666; 43 111. 327. The party receiving rents and profits must pay taxes. 12 Amer. L. Rep. 411.
McMillan £ McMillan, for appellants, in reply.
The deed dates from the date of sale. 99 Ark. 324; 135 Ark. 279; 77 Ark. 216; 137 Ark. 153; 27 Ark. 463; 16 R. C. L. § 106; 59 U. S. Rep. 540; 86 Ark. 258. •

Opinion:
Humphreys, J.
This . suit was commenced in. the Nevada Chancery Court by appellees against appellants to recover a personal judgment against M. W. Greeson for $8,192.86, and to foreclose a mortgage lien on certain lands in said county given by Greeson and wife to secure same. Jas. G. Clark, who purchased Greeson's equity in the land, was made a party defendant. A judgment and decree of foreclosure against the lands to satisfy same was obtained on the 7th day of October, 1921. Pursuant to the order of sale, the duly appointed commissioner, A. S. McGough, sold the land at public sale on December 3, 1921, at which sale Louis Suckle, being the highest bidder, purchased the land for $11,000. The sale was confirmed and the purchase money paid to the commissioner on April 6, 1922. Thereupon Jas. G. Clark and M. W. Greeson filed an intervention asking that, after paying the cost and amount due appellee, the surplus-be paid to Jas. G. Clark. The court denied the intervention in part, ordering that the surplus be paid to Clark after paying costs, the amount due appellee, and the taxes for the year 1921. From that part of the decree ordering the commissioner to pay the 1921 taxes on said land out of the proceeds of the sale appellants have duly prosecuted an appeal to this court.
Appellants contend that the court erred in ordering the taxes paid out of the proceeds of the sale. The sale occurred on December 3, 1921. On that date the taxes were not due and payable. It is true that the sale was not confirmed until April 6, 1921, but the date of sale, and not confirmation thereof, governs as to whether the purchaser or mortgagor at judicial sales shall be charged with the taxes. Under our statutes the mortgagor is chargeable with the State, county and municipal taxes due and payable' on the day the land is bid in, and the purchaser is chargeable with the taxes which become due and payable at a subsequent date. Miners Bank of Joplin v. Churchill, ante p. 191. The court erred in ordering the 1921 taxes paid out of the proceeds of the sale.
The decree is therefore reversed and the cause is remanded, with directions to enter judgment in favor of James G. Clark" for $421.27, with 6 per cent, interest from April 6,1922, same being the amount of the 1921 taxes.