Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Armando PAREDES-MUNOZ, also known as Ramon Paredes, also known as Armando Padres, Defendant-Appellant UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Armando PAREDES-MUNOZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-10-25
Citations: 544 F. App'x 468
Docket Number: Nos. 13-10104, 13-10108
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Armando PAREDES-MUNOZ, also known as Ramon Paredes, also known as Armando Padres, Defendant-Appellant UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Armando PAREDES-MUNOZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before JOLLY, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 544
Pages: 468–469

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Armando PAREDES-MUNOZ, also known as Ramon Paredes, also known as Armando Padres, Defendant-Appellant UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Armando PAREDES-MUNOZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 13-10104, 13-10108
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Oct. 25, 2013.
James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney U.S. Attorney’s Office, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Jason Douglas Hawkins, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Dallas, TX, Peter Michael Fleury, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Fort Worth, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before JOLLY, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Armando Paredes-Munoz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Pa-redes-Munoz has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that these consolidated appeals present no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEALS ARE DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.