Case Name: Helen H. BENNETT, Petitioner, v. John FRATUS, Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1965-08-17
Citations: 177 So. 2d 702
Docket Number: No. 64-651
Parties: Helen H. BENNETT, Petitioner, v. John FRATUS, Respondent.
Judges: Before HENDRY, C. J., and TILLMAN PEARSON and CARROLL, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 177
Pages: 702–703

Head Matter:
Helen H. BENNETT, Petitioner, v. John FRATUS, Respondent.
No. 64-651.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
Aug. 17, 1965.
Dean & Adams and Jeanne Heyward, Miami, for petitioner.
Dermer, Rosen & Mofsky, Miami Beach, for respondent.
Before HENDRY, C. J., and TILLMAN PEARSON and CARROLL, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The petition for certiorari filed herein was denied November 4, 1964, without opinion. Bennett v. Fratus, Fla.App., 168 So.2d 792, Case No. 2. Thereupon petitioner applied to the Supreme Court of Florida for a writ of certiorari directed to this Court. While this latter petition was pending in the Supreme Court of Florida, that court rendered its decision in Crews v. Dobson, 177 So.2d 202, opinion filed July 7, 1965, and its decision in Bennett v. Fratus, 177 So.2d 334, opinion filed July 21, 1965.
The Supreme Court of Florida has now returned jurisdiction of this cause to us for further consideration in the light of the foregoing decisions. See Bennett v. Fratus, Fla., 177 So.2d 336, opinion filed July 21, 1965. See also Florida East Coast Railway Company v. Lewis, Fla.App., 167 So.2d 104.
We hereby vacate our prior order denying the petition for certiorari, and dismiss the petition in the exercise of our discretion not to review the interlocutory order at law which is the subject of the petition. This action is without prejudice to any further action by the trial court consistent with the cases cited above.
It is so ordered.