Case Name: Gray, Appellant, v. City of Pittsburgh
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1892-02-01
Citations: 147 Pa. 354
Docket Number: Appeal No. 48
Parties: Gray, Appellant, v. City of Pittsburgh.
Judges: Before Paxson, C. J., Stebbett, Gbeen, Williams, McCollum, Mitchell and Heydbick, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 147
Pages: 354–355

Head Matter:
Gray, Appellant, v. City of Pittsburgh.
Constitutional law — Aot of May 16,1891.
The act of May 16, 1891, P. L. 71, is constitutional. See Donley v. Pittsburgh, supra.
Argued Jan. 22, 1892.
Appeal No. 48, Oct. T., 1892, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. No. 1, Allegheny Co., March T., 1892, No. 262, dismissing a bill in equity.
Before Paxson, C. J., Stebbett, Gbeen, Williams, McCollum, Mitchell and Heydbick, JJ.
Bill in equity by Cyrus S. Gray and Maggie J. Gray, his wife, against the city of Pittsburgh. The facts were similar to those in Donley v. Pittsburgh, supra.
Johns MeOleave, J. M. Swearingen and O. A. O'Brien, for appellants.
D. T. Watson and W. C. Moreland, with them T. D. Carnahan, for appellee.
February 1, 1892.

Opinion:
Per Curiam,
All of the Questions presented by this appeal have been disposed of in Donley's Appeal, decided herewith.
The decree is affirmed and the appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellants.