Case Name: Amelia Gallo ARZOUMANIAN and Mark Puzant Arzoumanian, Appellants, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee Under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, Dated as of October 1, 2002, Among Credit-Based Asset Servicing and Securitization LLC, PPT ABS LLC, Litton Loan Servicing LP and U.S. Bank National Association, PPT Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2002-1, Without Recourse, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2007-11-01
Citations: 967 So. 2d 1020
Docket Number: No. 4D06-4561
Parties: Amelia Gallo ARZOUMANIAN and Mark Puzant Arzoumanian, Appellants, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee Under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, Dated as of October 1, 2002, Among Credit-Based Asset Servicing and Securitization LLC, PPT ABS LLC, Litton Loan Servicing LP and U.S. Bank National Association, PPT Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2002-1, Without Recourse, Appellee.
Judges: KLEIN, STEVENSON and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 967
Pages: 1020–1021

Head Matter:
Amelia Gallo ARZOUMANIAN and Mark Puzant Arzoumanian, Appellants, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee Under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, Dated as of October 1, 2002, Among Credit-Based Asset Servicing and Securitization LLC, PPT ABS LLC, Litton Loan Servicing LP and U.S. Bank National Association, PPT Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2002-1, Without Recourse, Appellee.
No. 4D06-4561.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Nov. 1, 2007.
Jennifer S. Carroll of the Law Offices of Jennifer S. Carroll, P.A., Palm Beach Gardens, for appellants.
No appearance for appellee.

Opinion:
Order on Motion To Relinquish Jurisdiction
PER CURIAM.
Counsel for appellants, who has been recently retained, has filed a motion to relinquish jurisdiction to the trial court in order for appellants to file a motion for relief from judgment under rule 1.540. Because relinquishment of jurisdiction for consideration of a rule 1.540 motion results in delay, we do not routinely grant motions to relinquish for this purpose unless we have been furnished a copy of the rule 1.540 motion. We accordingly deny this motion without prejudice to appellants filing their rule 1.540 motion in the trial court, and then filing a motion for relinquishment in this court, with a copy of the rule 1.540 motion attached.
KLEIN, STEVENSON and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.