Case Name: Whyte (Harriet) by guardian ad litem, Respondent, vs. Lindblom and another, Appellants
Court: Wisconsin Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Wisconsin
Decision Date: 1934-09-11
Citations: 216 Wis. 27
Docket Number: 
Parties: Whyte (Harriet) by guardian ad litem, Respondent, vs. Lindblom and another, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Wisconsin Reports
Volume: 216
Pages: 27–28

Head Matter:
Whyte (Harriet) by guardian ad litem, Respondent, vs. Lindblom and another, Appellants.
May 9
September 11, 1934.
For the appellants there were briefs by Hammond & Jones of Kenosha, and oral argument by Walter W. Hammond.
For the respondent there was a brief by Randall, Cavanagh, Stephenson & Mittelstaed of Kenosha, and oral argument by Roy S. Stephenson.

Opinion:
The following opinion was filed June 5, 1934:
Fairchild, J.
The facts in this case are set forth in the companion case of Jessel S. Whyte v. Lindblom, ante, p. 21, 255 N. W. 265, 256 N. W. 244. The driver of the car failed to make proper observations before entering an intersection, and is guilty of a failure to maintain a proper lookout. The rule in the companion case controls this case. The judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and a new trial granted.
By the Court. — Judgment reversed, and cause remanded with directions to grant a new trial.