Case Name: Wallace Edward PHANEUF, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-03-08
Citations: 557 So. 2d 685
Docket Number: No. 89-66
Parties: Wallace Edward PHANEUF, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: COBB and PETERSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 557
Pages: 685–686

Head Matter:
Wallace Edward PHANEUF, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 89-66.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
March 8, 1990.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Barbara L. Condon, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
GRIFFIN, Judge.
This is an appeal from a guideline departure sentence. The reasons given for de parture were based on probation violations and are invalid. Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d 838 (Fla.1989); Ree v. State, 14 F.L.W. 565, — So.2d - (Fla. Nov. 16, 1989). Accordingly, the defendant's sentence is vacated and the cause remanded for resentencing within the guidelines.
Sentence VACATED; case REMANDED for resentencing.
COBB and PETERSON, JJ., concur.