Case Name: In the Matter of the Application for an Order to Strike from the Enrollment Book of the Twenty-seventh Election District of the Twenty-fifth Assembly District in the County of New York the name of John McGuire. Landon T. Davies, Appellant; John R. Voorhis and Others, Commissioners of the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1907-02-15
Citations: 117 A.D. 637
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Application for an Order to Strike from the Enrollment Book of the Twenty-seventh Election District of the Twenty-fifth Assembly District in the County of New York the name of John McGuire. Landon T. Davies, Appellant; John R. Voorhis and Others, Commissioners of the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 117
Pages: 637–638

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Application for an Order to Strike from the Enrollment Book of the Twenty-seventh Election District of the Twenty-fifth Assembly District in the County of New York the name of John McGuire. Landon T. Davies, Appellant; John R. Voorhis and Others, Commissioners of the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents.
First Department,
February 15, 1907.
Appeal by the applicant, Landon T. Davies, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Mew York Special Term and entered in the office of. the clerk of the county of Mew York on the 23d day of Movember, 1906, denying the appellant’s application to strike thena^ne of John McGuire from the enrollment book of the twenty-seventh election district of the twenty-fifth Assembly district in the county óf Mew York.
James H. Hickey, for the appellant.
Theodore Connoly, for the respondents.
See Matter of Titus (ante, p. 631).— [Rep.

Opinion:
Laughlin, J.:
The material facts presented by this-record'differ from those preented in the Matter of Titus (117 App. Div. 621), argued and decided herewith, only in that the affiant, who asserts the, facts positively, resided next door'on the same avenue to the number from whicli the elector enrolled, and consequently the opinion in that iqatter is decisive of this appeal. - , • .
It follows that the order should be affirmed upon the authority of . the opinion in Matter of Titus.
Pattebson, P. J., concurred; Clarke and Ingraham, JJ., dissented.