Case Name: U.S. v. Colin M. Jameson
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-01-19
Citations: 71 M.J. 104
Docket Number: No. 12-0136/AR
Parties: U.S. v. Colin M. Jameson.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Military Justice Reporter
Volume: 71
Pages: 104–105

Head Matter:
No. 12-0136/AR.
U.S. v. Colin M. Jameson.

Opinion:
CCA 20090908. Review granted on following issue:
WHERE A SPECIFICATION CHARGED UNDER ARTICLE 134, UCMJ, FAILS TO STATE AN OFFENSE UNDER UNITED STATES v. FOS- LER, 70 M.J. 225 (C.A.A.F. 2011), BY NOT INCLUDING THE TERMINAL ELEMENTS FOR CLAUSE 1 OR 2, CAN AN ACCUSED PROVIDENTLY PLEAD GUILTY TO SUCH A SPECIFICATION WHERE HE FAILS TO OBJECT TO THE SPECIFICATION AT TRIAL, WHERE THE MILITARY JUDGE ADVISES THE ACCUSED OF THE TERMINAL ELEMENTS DURING THE PROVIDENCE INQUIRY, AND THE ACCUSED ADMITS TO ALL THE ELEMENTS?
No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.