Case Name: G. R. WHITE et al. v. N. MILLER et al.
Court: Texas Courts of Civil Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1936-12-03
Citations: 103 S.W.2d 1075
Docket Number: No. 3449
Parties: G. R. WHITE et al. v. N. MILLER et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 103
Pages: 1075–1075

Head Matter:
G. R. WHITE et al. v. N. MILLER et al.
No. 3449.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. El Paso.
Dec. 3, 1936.
Sam McCollum, of Brady, and Carl Runge, of Mason (Turney, Burges, Cul-well & Pollard, of El Paso, on the brief), for appellants.
Luther Lynn, Harris & Harris and M. E. Sedberry, all of San Angelo, for appel-lees.

Opinion:
WALTHALL, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order overruling a plea of privilege. The case is companion to G. R. White et al. v. C. M. Houston, 103 S.W.(2d) 1073, this day decided. For the reasons stated in the opinion in the companion case, the judgment should be affirmed. There are some differences in the facts shown in the present case but such differences strengthen the view that the notes sued upon and which are payable at Stanton are valid obligations of the partnership of White & Tom.
Affirmed.