Case Name: SKYLINK AVIATION, INC., Appellant, v. ST. CHARLES COUNTY, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-05-18
Citations: 991 S.W.2d 214
Docket Number: No. 75154
Parties: SKYLINK AVIATION, INC., Appellant, v. ST. CHARLES COUNTY, Respondent.
Judges: Before JAMES R. DOWD, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 991
Pages: 214–215

Head Matter:
SKYLINK AVIATION, INC., Appellant, v. ST. CHARLES COUNTY, Respondent.
No. 75154.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
May 18, 1999.
David M. Dare, Daniel E. Herren, Her-rén, Dare & Streett, St. Louis, for appellant.
Mary Stewart Tansey, Asst. County Counselor, St. Charles, for respondent.
Before JAMES R. DOWD, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Skylink Aviation, Inc. ("Skylink") appeals from a judgment granting St. Charles County's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. On appeal, Skylink argues that the trial court erred in (1) denying its motion for leave to file second amended petition after the judgment was entered, and (2) holding that Skylink failed to allege circumstances that are special or extraordinary so that the theory of promissory estoppel would apply.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and record on appeal and no error of law exists. No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an extended opinion reciting detailed facts and restating principles of law. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).