Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. COLE W. CONKLIN, Defendant-Appellant; STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ANDREW JOHN PATRICK BETTS, Defendant-Appellant; STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ERIK ROBERT LAND, aka Eric Robert Land, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2007-09-26
Citations: 215 Or. App. 293
Docket Number: 04C47611; A127226; 04C-50598; A127272; 04C-47610; A127635
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. COLE W. CONKLIN, Defendant-Appellant. STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ANDREW JOHN PATRICK BETTS, Defendant-Appellant. STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ERIK ROBERT LAND, aka Eric Robert Land, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Armstrong and Rosenblum, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 215
Pages: 293–295

Head Matter:
On appellants’ and respondent’s joint petition for reconsideration filed August 30,
reconsideration allowed; former opinion (214 Or App 80, 162 P3d 364) modified and adhered to as modified; former disposition withdrawn; in A127226 and A127635, convictions for violation of former ORS 475.999(1) (2003) vacated and remanded for entry of convictions for violation of ORS 475.840, and for resentencing; inA127272, conviction for violation of former ORS 475.999(1) (2003) vacated and remanded for entry of conviction for violation of ORS 475.840, and for resentencing; otherwise affirmed September 26, 2007
STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. COLE W. CONKLIN, Defendant-Appellant. STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ANDREW JOHN PATRICK BETTS, Defendant-Appellant. STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ERIK ROBERT LAND, aka Eric Robert Land, Defendant-Appellant.
Marion County Circuit Court
04C47611; A127226 (Control)
Marion County Circuit Court
04C-50598; A127272
Marion County Circuit Court
04C-47610; A127635
168 P3d 1158
Rebecca A. Duncan, Chief Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, and Jonathan H. Fussner, Attorney-In-Charge, Criminal Appeals Unit, for petition.
Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Armstrong and Rosenblum, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
In these consolidated criminal cases, both parties jointly request reconsideration of our prior opinion, State v. Conklin, 214 Or App 80, 162 P3d 364 (2007), noting that our dispositional paragraph failed to order a remand for resentencing in two of the three consolidated cases involved in this appeal. We modify the disposition of the case as follows in order to correct that oversight:
Reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified and adhered to as modified; former disposition withdrawn. In A127226 and A127635, convictions for violation of former ORS 475.999(1) (2003) vacated and remanded for entry of convictions for violation of ORS 475.840, and for resentencing. In A127272, conviction for violation of former ORS 475.999(1) (2003) vacated and remanded for entry of conviction for violation of ORS 475.840, and for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.