Case Name: Walter Toemmes, Plaintiff in Error, vs. J. W. Proctor, Defendant in Error
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1931-09-14
Citations: 102 Fla. 918
Docket Number: 
Parties: Walter Toemmes, Plaintiff in Error, vs. J. W. Proctor, Defendant in Error.
Judges: Whiteield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 102
Pages: 918–918

Head Matter:
Walter Toemmes, Plaintiff in Error, vs. J. W. Proctor, Defendant in Error.
136 So. 622.
Division B.
Decision filed September 14, 1931.
Petition for rebearing denied October 9, 1931.
Blaolcwell & Gray, of Miami, for Plaintiff in Error.
Knight, Pace & Holt, of Miami, for Defendant in Error.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
— Tbe question presented in this case is whether or not the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict rendered, which has the approval of the trial judge who denied a motion for a directed verdict as well as a motion for a new trial. There is found in the record substantial evidence to support the verdict and judgment rendered, and therefore the judgment should be and is hereby affirmed. See 5th Headnote Pillet vs. Erschick, 99 Fla. 484, 126 So. 784.
Affirmed.
Whiteield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.