Case Name: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McClure
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1996-01-17
Citations: 74 Ohio St. 3d 310
Docket Number: No. 95-1666
Parties: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McClure.
Judges: Douglas, Weight, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 74
Pages: 310–314

Head Matter:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McClure.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. McClure (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 310.]
(No. 95-1666
Submitted September 27, 1995
Decided January 17, 1996.)
Geoffrey Stem, Disciplinary Counsel, and Sally Ann Steuk, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.
David Bernard McClure, pro se.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Upon review of the record, we agree that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(6) and 6-101(A)(3), as well as Gov.Bar R. V(4)(G) and X as charged in Counts I through IV of the complaint. We also agree with the sanction recommended by the board. Accordingly, respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for two years; however, both years of the sanction period are suspended and respondent is placed on probation under the conditions established by the board. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Douglas, Weight, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Moyer, C.J., and Cook, J., dissent.