Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose PAREDES-RODRIGUEZ, also known as Victor Manuel Alonzo-Lopez, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-03-27
Citations: 683 F. App'x 275
Docket Number: No. 16-40472 Summary Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose PAREDES-RODRIGUEZ, also known as Victor Manuel Alonzo-Lopez, Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 683
Pages: 275–276

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose PAREDES-RODRIGUEZ, also known as Victor Manuel Alonzo-Lopez, Defendant-Appellant
No. 16-40472 Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed March 27, 2017
Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Jose Paredes-Rodríguez, Pro Se
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Paredes-Rodríguez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed an initial brief and a supplemental brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Paredes-Rodriguez filed a response to counsel's initial brief but declined to file a response to the supplemental brief. We have reviewed counsel's briefs, Paredes-Rodriguez's response, and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cíe. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.