Case Name: The BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF PENNSYLVANIA v. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, Appellant, at No. 59. Appeal of David M. BARASCH, Consumer Advocate, at No. 58
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1989-01-25
Citations: 520 Pa. 114
Docket Number: Appeals Nos. 58 and 59 E.D. Appeal Dkt. 1988
Parties: The BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF PENNSYLVANIA v. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, Appellant, at No. 59. Appeal of David M. BARASCH, Consumer Advocate, at No. 58.
Judges: Before LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, ZAPPALA, PAPADAKOS and STOUT, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 520
Pages: 114–115

Head Matter:
552 A.2d 1046
The BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF PENNSYLVANIA v. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, Appellant, at No. 59. Appeal of David M. BARASCH, Consumer Advocate, at No. 58.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued Jan. 18, 1989.
Decided Jan. 25, 1989.
David M. Barasch, Consumer Advocate, Daniel Clearfield, Asst. Consumer Advocate, for appellant in No. 58.
John A. Levin, Asst. Counsel, Camp Hill, Bohdan R. Pankiw, Deputy Chief Counsel, Daniel P. Delaney, Chief Counsel, Harrisburg, for appellant in No. 59.
Thomas L. Welch, Daniel E. Monagle, Richard D. Spiegelman, Gerard J. St. John, Irving R. Segal, Philadelphia, for Bell Tel. Co. of Pa. at Nos. 58 and 59.
Peter A. Rohrbach, for U.S. Sprint at Nos. 58 and 59.
Edward J. Riehl, King of Prussia, for Business Users Group at Nos. 58 and 59.
John A. Levin, Camp Hill, Bohdan R. Pankiw, Daniel P. Delaney, Harrisburg, for Pa. Public Utility Com’n at No. 58.
Before LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, ZAPPALA, PAPADAKOS and STOUT, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Appeals dismissed as having been improvidently granted.
NIX, C.J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
ZAPPALA, J., dissents.