Case Name: In re William HALL; Eleanor Hall, Debtors. James RIGBY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William HALL; Eleanor Hall, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1994-11-30
Citations: 41 F.3d 502
Docket Number: No. 91-35934
Parties: In re William HALL; Eleanor Hall, Debtors. James RIGBY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William HALL; Eleanor Hall, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: SKOPIL, ALARCON and BEEZER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 41
Pages: 502–502

Head Matter:
In re William HALL; Eleanor Hall, Debtors. James RIGBY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William HALL; Eleanor Hall, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 91-35934.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Nov. 30, 1994.
Before: SKOPIL, ALARCON and BEEZER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
The opinion filed July 29, 1993 and reported at 1 F.3d 853 (1993) is withdrawn. With the opinion vacated, the petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc is moot. The parties may file a renewal of the petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc upon the filing of a new decision by the court.