Case Name: Isagani Pilotin MADRIAGA, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Anthony KANE, Warden, Respondent-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-01-10
Citations: 263 F. App'x 563
Docket Number: No. 06-56133
Parties: Isagani Pilotin MADRIAGA, Petitioner—Appellee, v. Anthony KANE, Warden, Respondent—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 263
Pages: 563–565

Head Matter:
Isagani Pilotin MADRIAGA, Petitioner—Appellee, v. Anthony KANE, Warden, Respondent—Appellant.
No. 06-56133.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted. Oct. 17, 2007.
Filed Jan. 10, 2008.
Davina T. Chen, Esq., FPDCA-Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner-Appellee.
Karl T. Terp, Alana Cohen Butler, Esq., AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, San Diego, CA, for Respondent-Appellant.
Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, McKEOWN, Circuit Judge and JONES, District Judge.
The Honorable Robert E. Jones, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
For the reasons given by the district court, the evidence wasn't sufficient to support petitioner's conviction. In holding otherwise, the California Court of Appeal unreasonably applied Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979). See Juan H. v. Allen, 408 F.3d 1262, 1274-75 (9th Cir.2005).
AFFIRMED. tied to recover consequential damages based on Colorado LLC's alleged breach of contract, where Washington LLC did not inform Colorado LLC at time of contracting that third-party would terminate its relationship with Washington LLC or that its relationship was in jeopardy in the event of a breach.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.