Case Name: STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Curtis FREEMAN, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-06-17
Citations: 599 So. 2d 1053
Docket Number: No. 91-2402
Parties: STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Curtis FREEMAN, Appellee.
Judges: HERSEY, DELL and POLEN, JJ„ concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 599
Pages: 1053–1054

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Curtis FREEMAN, Appellee.
No. 91-2402.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
June 17, 1992.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and John Tiedemann, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Paul E. Petillo, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court's dismissal of the information as being overly broad as to the time frame charged. See State v. Jones, 539 So.2d 535 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Our affirmance is without prejudice to the state filing a new information with the time frame more narrowly drawn.
AFFIRMED.
HERSEY, DELL and POLEN, JJ" concur.