Case Name: David S. PHILLIPS, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2009-12-15
Citations: 298 S.W.3d 925
Docket Number: No. ED 92511
Parties: David S. PHILLIPS, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 298
Pages: 925–926

Head Matter:
David S. PHILLIPS, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Defendant/Respondent.
No. ED 92511.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Dec. 15, 2009.
Borengasser & Marler, Benjamin Bor-engasser, Todd R. Marler, Lake St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Johnathan H. Hale, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
David S. Phillips (Driver) appeals from the trial court's judgment sustaining the revocation of his driving privileges by the Director of Revenue (the Director) pursuant to the Director's authority under Section 577.041 h We affirm.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
. All statutory references are to RSMo.2007 Cum.Supp., unless otherwise indicated.