Case Name: Raymond R. Wortendyke, trustee, &c., complainant-appellant, v. Louis Rayot et al., defendants-respondents
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1917-09-13
Citations: 88 N.J. Eq. 344
Docket Number: 
Parties: Raymond R. Wortendyke, trustee, &c., complainant-appellant, v. Louis Rayot et al., defendants-respondents.
Judges: For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Beroten, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner — 13.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 88
Pages: 344–344

Head Matter:
Raymond R. Wortendyke, trustee, &c., complainant-appellant, v. Louis Rayot et al., defendants-respondents.
[Decided September 13th, 1917.]
Mr. Alexander J. Higgins, for the appellant.
Mr. J. Emil Walscheid, for the respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will he affirmed, for the reasons given by Vice-Chancellor Griffin in the opinion filed in the court below, and reported in 87 N. J. Eq. 159.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Beroten, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner — 13.
For reversal — None.