Case Name: Ralph A. BEATON et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Lawton McFARLAND et al., Defendants in Error
Court: Supreme Court of Texas
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1940-01-03
Citations: 134 S.W.2d 1058
Docket Number: No. 7577
Parties: Ralph A. BEATON et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Lawton McFARLAND et al., Defendants in Error.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 134
Pages: 1058–1058

Head Matter:
Ralph A. BEATON et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Lawton McFARLAND et al., Defendants in Error.
No. 7577.
Supreme Court of Texas.
Jan. 3, 1940.
Hamilton, Lipscomb, Wood & Swift, of Dallas, for Beaton.
Touchstone, Wight, Gormley, Strasburger & Price, of Dallas, for Flippen.
Frank Wilson and J. L. Zumwalt, both of Dallas, for defendants in error.

Opinion:
CRITZ, Justice.
The opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals, which is reported at 126 S.W.2d 719, correctly states the record and the law questions involved in this case, and correctly decides such law questions. Fidelity Union Insurance Co. v. Tate Hutchins et al., Tex.Sup., 133 S.W.2d 105.
In the case just cited we, in principle, fully discussed and decided the law questions involved in the retrial of this case. As we interpret it, the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals in this case is in harmony with our opinion in the Hutchins case. We therefore adopt the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals as so interpreted.
The judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals, which reverses the judgment of the 'district court and remands the cause to the district court for trial on its merits, is affirmed.