Case Name: Kayi GOUDEAGBE, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-11-07
Citations: 700 F. App'x 286
Docket Number: No. 17-1245
Parties: Kayi GOUDEAGBE, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 700
Pages: 286–287

Head Matter:
Kayi GOUDEAGBE, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 17-1245
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: October 19, 2017
Decided: November 7, 2017
Jay S. Marks, LAW OFFICES OF JAY S. MARKS, LLC, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Chad A. Readier, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Greg D. Mack, Senior Litigation Counsel, Leslie McKay, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kayi Goudeagbe, a native and citizen of Togo, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her motion to reopen. Gou-deagbe's motion was untimely filed, and the Board declined to exercise its sua sponte authority to reopen her proceedings.
We lack jurisdiction to review how the Board exercises its sua sponte discretion. See Lawrence v. Lynch, 826 F.3d 198, 206-07 (4th Cir. 2016); Mosere v. Mukasey, 652 F.3d 397, 400-01 (4th Cir. 2009). We therefore dismiss the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DISMISSED