Case Name: William Bradford DILLINGHAM, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1972-05-23
Citations: 262 So. 2d 241
Docket Number: No. 71-1240
Parties: William Bradford DILLINGHAM, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before BARKDULL C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 262
Pages: 241–242

Head Matter:
William Bradford DILLINGHAM, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 71-1240.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 23, 1972.
Ray Glist, Alvin E. Entin and Howard F. Ullman, Miami, for appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and J. Robert Olian, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before BARKDULL C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on the authority of Nickels v. State, 90 Fla. 659, 106 So. 479; Holland v. State, 129 Fla. 363, 176 So. 169; Victor v. State, 141 Fla. 508, 193 So. 762; Payton v. State, Fla.App.1967, 200 So.2d 255; Feldman v. State, Fla.App.1968, 212 So.2d 21; Baker v. State, Fla.1970, 241 So.2d 683; see also: Miller v. United States, 5th Cir. 1942, 126 F.2d 771; Conyers v. Wainwright, S.D.Fla.1970, 309 F.Supp. 1101.