Case Name: Gerald W. BEREUTER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-01-10
Citations: 890 S.W.2d 417
Docket Number: No. 65850
Parties: Gerald W. BEREUTER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before REINHARD, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 890
Pages: 417–418

Head Matter:
Gerald W. BEREUTER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. 65850.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Jan. 10, 1995.
Gerald W. Bereuter, pro se.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before REINHARD, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant appeals the denial of his "Motion to Correct Sentence by Order Nunc Pro Tunc". We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).