Case Name: Alejandro LOPEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles GREINER, Superintendent, Greenhaven Correctional Facility, Defendant, Elliot Spitzer, Attorney General, State of New York, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-12-21
Citations: 159 F. App'x 320
Docket Number: No. 04-3767
Parties: Alejandro LOPEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles GREINER, Superintendent, Greenhaven Correctional Facility, Defendant, Elliot Spitzer, Attorney General, State of New York, RespondentAppellee.
Judges: PRESENT: Hon. GUIDO CALABRESI, Hon. ROBERT A. KATZMANN, and Hon. PETER W. HALL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 159
Pages: 320–321

Head Matter:
Alejandro LOPEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles GREINER, Superintendent, Greenhaven Correctional Facility, Defendant, Elliot Spitzer, Attorney General, State of New York, RespondentAppellee.
No. 04-3767.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Dec. 21, 2005.
Ira Mickenberg (Lloyd Epstein), Epstein & Weil, New York, NY., for Appellant, of counsel.
Mark Dwyer, Assistant District Attorney, for Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney New York County, New York, N.Y., for Appellee.
PRESENT: Hon. GUIDO CALABRESI, Hon. ROBERT A. KATZMANN, and Hon. PETER W. HALL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
SUMMARY ORDER
Alejandro Lopez, an inmate at Greenhaven Correctional Facility, petitions for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at his New York state trial, because his attorney failed to move to suppress the fruits of an allegedly illegal warrant. We assume the parties' familiarity with the relevant facts and the specification of issues on appeal.
We affirm the disposition of the district court for substantially the reasons given in its careful decision. Having considered each of Appellant's arguments and found them to be without merit, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.