Case Name: Robert EY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2003-11-07
Citations: 870 So. 2d 64
Docket Number: No. 2D03-2811
Parties: Robert EY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: FULMER, KELLY, and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 870
Pages: 64–65

Head Matter:
Robert EY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D03-2811.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Nov. 7, 2003.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Alexander v. State, 830 So.2d 899 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Brown v. State, 827 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); McGee v. State, 684 So.2d 241 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). As this court did in Alexander, 830 So.2d at 899-90, we certify the same question of great public importance, to wit:
WHETHER ALLEGATIONS OF AFFIRMATIVE MISADVICE BY TRIAL COUNSEL ON THE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES OF A DEFENDANT'S PLEA FOR FUTURE CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR IN AN OTHERWISE FACIALLY SUFFICIENT MOTION ARE COGNIZABLE AS AN INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL CLAIM.
Affirmed; question certified.
FULMER, KELLY, and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.