Case Name: REGENCY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. MATSON INSURANCE AND BONDING, INC., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-10-29
Citations: 587 So. 2d 676
Docket Number: No. 91-105
Parties: REGENCY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. MATSON INSURANCE AND BONDING, INC., Appellee.
Judges: Before FERGUSON, LEVY and GERSTEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 587
Pages: 676–676

Head Matter:
REGENCY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. MATSON INSURANCE AND BONDING, INC., Appellee.
No. 91-105.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 29, 1991.
Kluger, Peretz, Kaplan, & Berlin and Alan J. Kluger, Miami, for appellant.
Touby Smith DeMahy & Drake and Kenneth R. Drake, Miami, for appellee.
Before FERGUSON, LEVY and GERSTEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
A review of the record reflects sufficient evidence, including reasonable inferences that may properly be drawn therefrom, so as to entitle the appellant to have its case submitted to a jury for the determination of the questions of fact. See Brown v. Sims, 538 So.2d 901 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Hernandez v. Motrico, Inc., 370 So.2d 836 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). Accordingly, it was error for the trial court to grant the appellee's Motion for Directed Verdict.
Reversed.