Case Name: Rufus S. MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-10-10
Citations: 567 So. 2d 1041
Docket Number: No. 90-1190
Parties: Rufus S. MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SHIVERS, C.J., JOANOS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 567
Pages: 1041–1042

Head Matter:
Rufus S. MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 90-1190.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Oct. 10, 1990.
Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Gypsy Bailey, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. Huff v. State, 566 So.2d 945 (Fla. 1st DCA, 1990); Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315. We certify the following question to the supreme court as one of great public importance:
DOES A DOUBLE JEOPARDY VIOLATION RESULT FROM THE IMPOSITION OF A PROBATIONARY SPLIT SENTENCE WHEN THE LEGISLATURE HAS NOT EXPLICITLY AUTHORIZED THAT DISPOSITION IN THE SENTENCING ALTERNATIVES FOR SECTION 921.087, FLORIDA STATUTES?
SHIVERS, C.J., JOANOS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.