Case Name: Walter S. Davies, Resp't, v Frederick W. Kalbfleisch, App'lt
Court: Brooklyn City Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1894-06-25
Citations: 62 N.Y. St. Rep. 873
Docket Number: 
Parties: Walter S. Davies, Resp’t, v Frederick W. Kalbfleisch, App’lt.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 62
Pages: 873–874

Head Matter:
Brooklyn City Court — General Term.
Filed June 25, 1894.
Walter S. Davies, Resp’t, v Frederick W. Kalbfleisch, App’lt.
Edward V. B. Kissam, for app’lt; W. Bapelyea Davies, for resp’t.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The exceptions at pages 12 and 18 were taken in general language. Counsel, if he claimed that there could be no recovery for use and occupation under the pleadings, should have specifically stated the ground of his objection. Niebuhr v. Schreyer, 135 N. Y. 614; 48 St. Rep. 73. Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs.