Case Name: Paul Cleveland THOMPSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M. WADE, Sheriff; D. Royal, Supervisor Classification; Mr. Walker, Classification and others to be named later; Deputy Ferguson, Defendants-Appellees, and Gene M. Johnson, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections (DOC) in their individual and official capacities; Henrico County Municipality, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-06-01
Citations: 433 F. App'x 153
Docket Number: No. 11-6233
Parties: Paul Cleveland THOMPSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M. WADE, Sheriff; D. Royal, Supervisor Classification; Mr. Walker, Classification and others to be named later; Deputy Ferguson, Defendants-Appellees, and Gene M. Johnson, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections (DOC) in their individual and official capacities; Henrico County Municipality, Defendants.
Judges: Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 433
Pages: 153–154

Head Matter:
Paul Cleveland THOMPSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M. WADE, Sheriff; D. Royal, Supervisor Classification; Mr. Walker, Classification and others to be named later; Deputy Ferguson, Defendants-Appellees, and Gene M. Johnson, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections (DOC) in their individual and official capacities; Henrico County Municipality, Defendants.
No. 11-6233.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 26, 2011.
Decided: June 1, 2011.
Paul Cleveland Thompson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Lisa H. Leiner, Harman, Claytor, Corrigan & Wellman, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Paul Cleveland Thompson appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no . reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thompson v. Wade, No. 2:10-cv-00174-RBS-TEM (E.D.Va. Jan. 18, 2011). We deny Thompson's motion for a declaratory judgment and for a preliminary and a permanent injunction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.