Case Name: ANNA HOLLINGSHEAD ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. NICODEMUS ZEMKOSKI ET AL., APPELLANTS
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1936-01-31
Citations: 116 N.J.L. 178
Docket Number: 
Parties: ANNA HOLLINGSHEAD ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. NICODEMUS ZEMKOSKI ET AL., APPELLANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 116
Pages: 178–178

Head Matter:
ANNA HOLLINGSHEAD ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. NICODEMUS ZEMKOSKI ET AL., APPELLANTS.
Submitted October 25, 1935 —
Decided January 31, 1936.
For the respondents, Jacob Gold and David Raskin.
For the appellants, James H. Sanderson and Abraham I. Feltman.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.