Case Name: ROSE DROTAR ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL., RESPONDENTS
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1939-09-22
Citations: 123 N.J.L. 201
Docket Number: 
Parties: ROSE DROTAR ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 123
Pages: 201–201

Head Matter:
ROSE DROTAR ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Argued May 24, 1939
Decided September 22, 1939.
For the appellants, Kenneth J. Dawes.
For the respondents, John A. Hartpence and B. Thorn Lord.

Opinion:
Pee Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker, in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 12.
For reversal — Hone.