Case Name: Esper, Respondent, v. New York El. R. Co. et al., Appellants
Court: New York Superior Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1892-01-11
Citations: 17 N.Y.S. 952
Docket Number: 
Parties: Esper, Respondent, v. New York El. R. Co. et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 17
Pages: 952–953

Head Matter:
Esper, Respondent, v. New York El. R. Co. et al., Appellants.
(Superior Court of Nrno York City, General Term.
January 11, 1892.)
Appeal from special term.
Action by Frederick Esper against the Yew York Elevated Railroad Company and the Manhattan Railway Company to restrain defendants from maintaining and operating their railway in front of plaintiff’s premises.
Argued before Freedman, MoAdam, and Gildersleeve, JJ.
Davies, Short & Townsend, (Julien T. Davies and Joseph E. Lord, of counsel,) for appellants. Peekham & Tyler, (Henry G. Atwater, of counsel,) for respondent.

Opinion:
Gildersleeve, J.
The judgment restrains the defendants from maintaining and operating their elevated railroad in front of the plaintiff's premises, Yo. 987 Third avenue, in the city of Yew York, unless the defendants shall pay or tender to the plaintiff, within a time fixed by the judgment, the sum of ¡>2,850, with interest thereon from October 20, 1890, the day the action carneen to be tried, as payment for the easements appurtenant to said premises* and accept a grant or conveyance of such easements, duly executed by the- plaintiff, and by all persons holding, mortgages on said premises. It also awards to the plaintiff the sum oí $2,249.04 for past damages, together with $283.29, for costs and disbursements. We find no error in the rulings of the court below that call for a reversal of the judgment, and the evidence sustains the findings of the court below, and justifies the judgment rendered. For these reasons the judgment appealed from is affirmed, with costs.