Case Name: Elizabeth CALLAN, Plaintiff-Appellant v. DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, as Trustee for the Certificateholders of Dover Mortgage Capital 2005-a Corporation, Grantor Trust Certificate, Series 2005-A, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-06-10
Citations: 654 F. App'x 171
Docket Number: No. 15-20709
Parties: Elizabeth CALLAN, Plaintiff-Appellant v. DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, as Trustee for the Certificateholders of Dover Mortgage Capital 2005-a Corporation, Grantor Trust Certificate, Series 2005-A, Defendant-Appellee
Judges: Before KING, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 654
Pages: 171–172

Head Matter:
Elizabeth CALLAN, Plaintiff-Appellant v. DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, as Trustee for the Certificateholders of Dover Mortgage Capital 2005-a Corporation, Grantor Trust Certificate, Series 2005-A, Defendant-Appellee
No. 15-20709
Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Date Filed: 06/10/2016
Ira D. Joffe, Bellaire, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Steven A. Leyh, Argie Dafhis Brame, Leyh, Payne & Mallia, P.L.L.C., Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before KING, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Elizabeth Callan appeals the district court's denial of her motion to alter or amend a judgment under Rule 59(e). The challenged order of March 21, 2015 declared only that Deutsche Bank's hen and power of sale over Callan's residential property were not barred by the statute of limitations. Both parties now agree that the same lien was released and discharged by the mortgage servicer on November 26, 2014. Because the lien that was the subject of the challenged order no longer exists, neither party has a "personal stake in the outcome" of any additional litigation on this issue. Lewis v. Cont'l Bank Corp., 494 U.S. 472, 478, 110 S.Ct. 1249, 108 L.Ed.2d 400 (1990). We find no case or controversy to address, so this appeal is DISMISSED as moot.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not Be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.