Case Name: ST. LOUIS COUNTY, Missouri, Plaintiff, v. B.A.P. INCORPORATED, Defendant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-03-09
Citations: 14 S.W.3d 596
Docket Number: No. 74164
Parties: ST. LOUIS COUNTY, Missouri, Plaintiff, v. B.A.P. INCORPORATED, Defendant.
Judges: Before JAMES A. PUDLOWSKI, P.J., KENT E. KAROHL, J., and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 14
Pages: 596–597

Head Matter:
ST. LOUIS COUNTY, Missouri, Plaintiff, v. B.A.P. INCORPORATED, Defendant.
No. 74164.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
March 9, 1999.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 12 and June 3, 1999.
Murry A. Marks, St. Louis, for appellant.
John A. Ross, Clayton, for respondent.
Before JAMES A. PUDLOWSKI, P.J., KENT E. KAROHL, J., and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant was charged by information with promotion of obscene material, section 706.070 S.L.C.R.O. The trial court found defendant guilty and assessed punishment at a $1,000 fine. Defendant appeals the judgment on his conviction. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).