Case Name: Emmett Madison GRAHAM, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Patricia R. Stansberry, RespondentsAppellees. Emmett Madison Graham, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. United States of America; Patricia R. Stansberry, RespondentsAppellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-02-22
Citations: 218 F. App'x 240
Docket Number: Nos. 06-7677, 06-7726
Parties: Emmett Madison GRAHAM, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Patricia R. Stansberry, Respondents-Appellees. Emmett Madison Graham, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. United States of America; Patricia R. Stansberry, Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 218
Pages: 240–241

Head Matter:
Emmett Madison GRAHAM, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Patricia R. Stansberry, Respondents-Appellees. Emmett Madison Graham, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. United States of America; Patricia R. Stansberry, Respondents-Appellees.
Nos. 06-7677, 06-7726.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 15, 2007.
Decided: Feb. 22, 2007.
Emmett Madison Graham, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Emmett Madison Graham, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition, motion for reconsideration, and motion for a certificate of appealability. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Graham v. United States, No. 5:06-hc-02076-FL (E.D.N.C. June 5, 2006; Sept. 6 & 28, 2006). We deny Graham's motions for an injunction, to appoint counsel, and for a certificate of appealability. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.