Case Name: LA RUE INVESTMENT COMPANY v. NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY and Another
Court: Minnesota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Minnesota
Decision Date: 1910-06-24
Citations: 111 Minn. 539
Docket Number: Nos. 16,641—(103)
Parties: LA RUE INVESTMENT COMPANY v. NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY and Another.
Judges: 
Reporter: Minnesota Reports
Volume: 111
Pages: 539–539

Head Matter:
LA RUE INVESTMENT COMPANY v. NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY and Another.
June 24, 1910.
Nos. 16,641—(103).
Application to the district court for St. Louis county to have the title to certain land registered. The answer of the Northern Pacific Railway Company was similar to the answer filed by it in the Gridley case (supra, page 281). The facts were stipulated. The terms of the conveyance from applicants’ remote grant- or were similar to those in the deed considered in the Gridley case. The proceeding was heard before Cant, J., who decreed that the La Rue Investment Company was the owner of the land subject to a certain right of way conveyed -to a steel company in 1893. Prom the order so entered, defendant Northern Pacific Railway Company appealed.
Affirmed.
Washburn, Bailey & Mitchell, for appellant.
Marion Douglas, for respondent.
Reported in 126 N. W. 899.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This case involves the same questions as the case of Gridley v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co., supra, page 281, 126 N. W. 897.
Judgment affirmed.