Case Name: Harold D. HOLDER, Sr., and Dur-O-Matic Water Heaters, Inc., Appellants, v. Lawrence M. TALLEY, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-12-28
Citations: 629 So. 2d 1001
Docket Number: No. 93-1640
Parties: Harold D. HOLDER, Sr., and Dur-O-Matic Water Heaters, Inc., Appellants, v. Lawrence M. TALLEY, Appellee.
Judges: Before JORGENSON, COPE and LEVY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 629
Pages: 1001–1002

Head Matter:
Harold D. HOLDER, Sr., and Dur-O-Matic Water Heaters, Inc., Appellants, v. Lawrence M. TALLEY, Appellee.
No. 93-1640.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 28, 1993.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 28, 1994.
DuBosar & Davidson and Holly Davidson, Boca Raton, for appellants.
Robert Ader, Miami, for appellee.
Before JORGENSON, COPE and LEVY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In view of the fact that the record reflects a conflict between the note in question and the "second addendum" that purportedly related to the said note, we hold that it was error for the trial court to have granted the summary judgment entered below. Accordingly, the summary judgment is reversed. This reversal is without prejudice to the ap-pellee filing a renewed motion for summary judgment at a future date, such as after the filing of an affidavit by Mrs. Talley disavow ing any interest in any note of which the appellant is the maker.
Reversed.