Case Name: Alberto Ramos, Appellant, v. City of New York et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2003-08-07
Citations: 307 A.D.2d 819
Docket Number: 
Parties: Alberto Ramos, Appellant, v City of New York et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 307
Pages: 819–819

Head Matter:
Alberto Ramos, Appellant, v City of New York et al., Respondents.
[762 NYS2d 807]

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Jerry Crispino, J.), entered December 11, 2002, which denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of defendant's liability for malicious prosecution, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The issues of fact identified in this Court's prior order reinstating the cause of action for malicious prosecution (285 AD2d 284 [2001]) remain unresolved on the instant record (cf. Parkin v Cornell Univ., 78 NY2d 523, 529 [1991]; Munoz v City of New York, 18 NY2d 6 [1966]; Martin v City of Albany, 42 NY2d 13 [1977]). Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Andrias and Lerner, JJ.