Case Name: HUBBARD-RAGSDALE COMPANY v. Charles M. DEAN, Collector of Internal Revenue for the First District of Ohio
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1926-10-15
Citations: 15 F.2d 1013
Docket Number: No. 4693
Parties: HUBBARD-RAGSDALE COMPANY v. Charles M. DEAN, Collector of Internal Revenue for the First District of Ohio.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 15
Pages: 1013–1014

Head Matter:
HUBBARD-RAGSDALE COMPANY v. Charles M. DEAN, Collector of Internal Revenue for the First District of Ohio.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
October 15, 1926.)
No. 4693.
For opinion below, see 15 F.(2d) 410.
Norwood J. Utter, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for plaintiff in error.
Haveth E. Man, U. S. Atty., and Simon Ross, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Judgment of the Distriet Court affirmed, upon the authority of Law v. United States, 266 U. S. 494, 45 S. Ct. 175, 69 L. Ed. 401; Fleischman v. United States, 270 U. S. 349, 46 S. Ct. 284, 70 L. Ed. 624; United States v. Gordin (C. C. A. 6) 9 F. (2d) 394.