Case Name: Rekala MORRISON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2017-11-22
Citations: 230 So. 3d 623
Docket Number: Case No. 2D17-909
Parties: Rekala MORRISON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: KELLY, CRENSHAW, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 230
Pages: 623–623

Head Matter:
Rekala MORRISON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Case No. 2D17-909
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Opinion filed November 22, 2017
Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Richard P. Albertine, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this Anders appeal, we affirm Reka-la Morrison's judgments and sentences and the revocation of her probation. However, the order of revocation of probation entered on February 21, 2017, nunc pro tunc to February 16, 2017, does not identify the conditions found to be violated. We remand solely for entry of a corrected revocation order specifying the conditions of probation that Ms. Morrison violated. See Huggins v. State, 216 So.3d 785, 785 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017); Greene v. State, 919 So.2d 684, 685 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) ("A proper order of revocation will identify the specific conditions of probation violated by the defendant." (citing Greer v. State, 831 So.2d 1261, 1262 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002))).
Affirmed; remanded with directions.
KELLY, CRENSHAW, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).