Case Name: Roy Lee PALMER, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES JUDICIAL BRANCH, et al. Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-01-16
Citations: 54 F. App'x 503
Docket Number: No. 02-5262
Parties: Roy Lee PALMER, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES JUDICIAL BRANCH, et al. Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 54
Pages: 503–503

Head Matter:
Roy Lee PALMER, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES JUDICIAL BRANCH, et al. Appellees.
No. 02-5262.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Jan. 16, 2003.
Before GINSBURG, Chief Judge; SENTELLE and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's order filed June 7, 2002, be affirmed. The court correctly held that appellant may not pursue this damages action because his sentence has not been invalidated in a habeas or similar proceeding. See, e.g., Edwards v. Balisok, 520 U.S. 641, 117 S.Ct. 1584, 137 L.Ed.2d 906 (1997); Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994); Razzoli v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 230 F.3d 371 (D.C.Cir .2000).
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.