Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kelly George STANBACK, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-09-14
Citations: 616 F. App'x 57
Docket Number: No. 15-6969
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kelly George STANBACK, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 616
Pages: 57–58

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kelly George STANBACK, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-6969.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 9, 2015.
Decided: Sept. 14, 2015.
Kelly George Stanback, Appellant Pro Se. Grayson A. Hoffman, Jeb Thomas Ter-rien, Assistant United States Attorneys, Elizabeth G. Wright, Office of the United States Attorney, Harrisonburg, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kelly George Stanback appeals the district court's order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Stanback, No. 5:02-cr-30020-SGW-1 (W.D.Va. filed June 8 and entered June 9, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Although the district court granted Stanbaclc's § 3582 motion, the reduction granted by the court did not reduce Stanback's sentence to the full extent he requested.