Case Name: Fortino Salazar v. The State
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1925-10-14
Citations: 102 Tex. Crim. 189
Docket Number: No. 9693
Parties: Fortino Salazar v. The State.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Criminal Reports
Volume: 102
Pages: 189–190

Head Matter:
Fortino Salazar v. The State.
No. 9693.
Delivered October 14, 1925.
Rehearing granted State November 11, 1925.
No brief filed by appellant.
Tom Garrard, State’s Attorney, and Grover C. Morris, Assistant State’s Attorney, for the State.

Opinion:
MORROW, Presiding Judge.
The offense is assault to murder; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of seven years.
From the transcript before us, it appears that the trial took place before a special judge. The Statute requires that before a special judge shall enter upon his duties, he shall take the oath of office required by the Constitution, and his selection and the fact that the oath of office has been administered to him shall be entered upon the minutes of the court as a part of the record in the cause. Upon this subject the present record is silent. That it is essential that the oath of office be taken and that the record reveal it has often been declared by this court. See Smith v. State, 24 Texas Crim. App. 290; Reed v. State, 55 Texas Crim. Rep. 138; 114 S. W. Rep. 834; Dawes v. State, 222 S. W. Rep. 560.
As the matter is presented, we have no choice but to order a reversal of the judgment, which is accordingly done.
Reversed and remanded.