Case Name: BURR against FAIRHOLME
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1812-09
Citations: 3 N.J.L. 965
Docket Number: 
Parties: BURR against FAIRHOLME.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 3
Pages: 520–520

Head Matter:
BURR against FAIRHOLME.
OR CERTIORARI.
The cause below had been referred to referees. The referees reported a sum due to the plaintiff ;■ and also that a certain promissory note belonged to one of the parties. It was contended on the part of the plaintiff in certiorari, that this report was erroneous, and could not be supported by reason of the clause respecting the promissory note.

Opinion:
By the Court.
We think that circumstance does not destroy the report.
Judgment affirmed.