Case Name: In the Matter of R. L. A., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. R. L. A., Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2009-06-17
Citations: 229 Or. App. 180
Docket Number: 071171720; A137834
Parties: In the Matter of R. L. A., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. R. L. A., Appellant.
Judges: Before Wollheim, Presiding Judge, and Brewer, Chief Judge, and Riggs, Senior Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 229
Pages: 180–181

Head Matter:
Submitted May 18,
reversed June 17,2009
In the Matter of R. L. A., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. R. L. A., Appellant.
Multnomah County Circuit Court
071171720; A137834
210 P3d 928
Lance D. Perdue filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Linda Wicks, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Wollheim, Presiding Judge, and Brewer, Chief Judge, and Riggs, Senior Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Appellant was originally committed to the Mental Health Division on the grounds that he was unable to provide for his basic personal needs and that he was dangerous to others. ORS 426.005(l)(d)(A), (B). In the current proceeding, he was recommitted for a period not to exceed 90 days on the ground that he was still mentally ill and in need of further treatment. See ORS 426.301(1) (setting out grounds for recommitment). On appeal, appellant contends that the trial court erred in recommitting him, because the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence to support his recommitment. The state concedes the error and, on de novo review, we agree and accept the concession.
Reversed.