Case Name: D. K. Dickinson, J. H. Dickinson, O. H. Denny and C. A. Vincent, Plantiffs in Error, vs. Frederick W. Raichl, Defendant in Error
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1932-04-15
Citations: 105 Fla. 11
Docket Number: 
Parties: D. K. Dickinson, J. H. Dickinson, O. H. Denny and C. A. Vincent, Plantiffs in Error, vs. Frederick W. Raichl, Defendant in Error.
Judges: 
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 105
Pages: 11–12

Head Matter:
D. K. Dickinson, J. H. Dickinson, O. H. Denny and C. A. Vincent, Plantiffs in Error, vs. Frederick W. Raichl, Defendant in Error.
140 So. 787.
Division B.
Decision filed April 15, 1932.
Robert T. Dewell, W. H. Brewton and George P. Garrett, for Plaintiffs in Error;
George W. Dayton, for Defendant in Error.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to' the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed. See Bailey vs. Inman, decided present term.
Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.