Case Name: DeMARIA v. NETH
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1929-05-31
Citations: 7 Ohio Law Abs. 377
Docket Number: No. 1634
Parties: DeMARIA v NETH
Judges: Funk, PJ, and Washburn, J, concur. Pardee, J, not participating.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 7
Pages: 377–377

Head Matter:
DeMARIA v NETH
Ohio Appeals, 9th Dist, Summit Co
No. 1634.
Decided May 31, 1929
Gurney, Gurney & Gurney, Cleveland and Wm. A. Slater, Akron, for DeMaria.
Dustin, McKeehan, Merrick, Arter & Stewart, Cleveland, for Neth.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
As has been said, there is not a syllable of testimony in the record in reference to said objectionable lines, and there is nothing in the record, except the lines themselves, to suggest any meaning or opinion of the witness or that the jurors probably understood that they were intended to express such opinion of-the witness as is claimed for them; but in any event, from a reading and consideration of the whole record, we are satisfied that if it was error to admit the sketch with the objectionable lines thereon, it was not prejudicial error in this case; and there being no other claim of error, the judgment is affirmed.
Funk, PJ, and Washburn, J, concur. Pardee, J, not participating.