Case Name: Mary I. Reinbolt v. Joseph F. Reinbolt
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1925
Citations: 3 Ohio Law Abs. 298
Docket Number: No. 18691
Parties: Mary I. Reinbolt v. Joseph F. Reinbolt.
Judges: T..^?nes’ Matthias, Day, and Allen, JJ., concur. Kmkade, J., not participating.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 3
Pages: 298–298

Head Matter:
No. 18691
Mary I. Reinbolt v. Joseph F. Reinbolt.
Error to the Court of Appeals of Sandusky county.
857. NUNC PRO TUNC ENTRIES—Court cannot make after term, except to make entry truthful.—And not to alter its conclusion.

Opinion:
ROBINSON, J.
1. The power of the trial court to make an entry nunc pro tunc after term, does not extend beyond the power to make the journal entry speak the truth.
,2. A trial court is without power to alter his conclusion by nunc pro tunc entry at a term subsequent to the term of the original entry.
Judgment affirmed.
T..^?nes' Matthias, Day, and Allen, JJ., concur. Kmkade, J., not participating.