Case Name: Lowell et al. v. Rice
Court: Colorado Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Colorado
Decision Date: 1909-09
Citations: 46 Colo. 471
Docket Number: No. 5752
Parties: Lowell et al. v. Rice.
Judges: Mr. Justice Campbell and Mr. Justice Musser concur.
Reporter: Colorado Reports
Volume: 46
Pages: 471–472

Head Matter:
[No. 5752.]
Lowell et al. v. Rice.
1. Appeal — Abstract of the Record — Error assigned upon tbe denial of a motion for a new trial will not be considered unless tbe motion is set out in tbe printed abstract. — (472)
2. Where the Facts Will Be Examined — A finding upon conflicting evidence will not be disturbed. — (472)
Appeal from Denver County Court — Hon. Charles McCall, Judge.
Mr. E. M. Sabin, for plaintiff in error.
Mr. W. E. Clabk, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
Chiee Justice Steele
delivered the opinion of the court:
Upon the appeal to the county court, judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff. The assignments of error-relate to the sufficiency of the evidence, the overruling of the motion for a new trial, and the rejection of certain testimony.
The refusal of the court to receive testimony offered by the defendant was clearly not prejudicial.
The motion for a new trial is not found in the abstract; and as there was a conflict in the evidence, we shall affirm the judgment. Affirmed.
Mr. Justice Campbell and Mr. Justice Musser concur.