Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nathan Wane HERRINGTON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-09-23
Citations: 294 F. App'x 310
Docket Number: No. 07-10057
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nathan Wane HERRINGTON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 294
Pages: 310–311

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nathan Wane HERRINGTON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-10057.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 8, 2008.
Filed Sept. 23, 2008.
Christina Brown, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Arthur L. Allen, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Nathan Wane Herrington appeals from the 168-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for four counts of bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Herrington contends that the district court erred by treating the Sentencing Guidelines as presumptively reasonable and by affording them more weight than the other sentencing factors under 18 U.S.C. § 8553(a). We conclude that the district court did not commit procedural error and that the sentence is substantively reasonable. See Gall v. United States, — U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 586, 597, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); see also United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 995-96 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.