Case Name: Larry G. BROWN, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-02-20
Citations: 43 S.W.3d 390
Docket Number: No. ED 76602
Parties: Larry G. BROWN, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before MARY K. HOFF, C.J. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and CHARLES B. BLACKMAR, S.J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 43
Pages: 390–390

Head Matter:
Larry G. BROWN, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 76602.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Feb. 20, 2001.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 29, 2001.
Application to Transfer Denied May 29, 2001.
Kent Denzel, Assistant Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Susan K. Glass, Assistant Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before MARY K. HOFF, C.J. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and CHARLES B. BLACKMAR, S.J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Larry G. Brown (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error is without merit. The motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
The parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).