Case Name: The Knickerbocker Life Insurance Company, Appellant, v. George T. Patterson, Assignee, etc., et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1878-11-12
Citations: 75 N.Y. 589
Docket Number: 
Parties: The Knickerbocker Life Insurance Company, Appellant, v. George T. Patterson, Assignee, etc., et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 75
Pages: 589–590

Head Matter:
The Knickerbocker Life Insurance Company, Appellant, v. George T. Patterson, Assignee, etc., et al., Respondents.
(Argued October 1, 1878;
decided November 12, 1878.)
The complaint in this action alleged, in substance, that plaintiff executed to McDonald, Dillout & Company, a corporation organized under the laws of this State, certain premises in the city of New York for the term of five years from May 1, 1874. That the lease was assigned by said corporation to defendant Patterson, who entered into possession February 20, 1875, and continued in possession until May 1, 1875. The action was to recover a quarter’s rent falling due by the terms of the lease on that day.
It appeared that on February 15, 1875, said corporation having became insolvent, an agreement was entered into, in which plaintiff and defendant and the other creditors of the company joined, advising an assignment by it for the benefit of creditors, and which provided that the rent then due and which should accrue on the lease up to May 1, 1875, should be deemed a valid claim against the company, and should be paid pro rata under the contemplated assignment. The creditors executing it agreed to accept the amount they should receive under the assignment “ in full satisfaction of their respective claims against the company.” An assignment was made as contemplated by the agreement February 21, 1875, and in pursuance of the request of the creditors, Patterson accepted the trust primarily as appointee and agent of the creditors. Held, that Patterson could not be charged personally as assignee of the lease, also that the fact that the assignment was set aside as void under the statute, did not impose such liability, as it would be in contravention of the agreement.
F. C. Cantine for appellant.
J. Hampden Dougherty for respondent.

Opinion:
Andrews, J.,
reads for affirmance.
All concur, except Miller and Earl, JJ., absent. Judgment affirmed.