Case Name: WALKOVIC et, Appellees, v. ABOOD, Appellant
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1950-06-28
Citations: 71 Ohio Law Abs. 397
Docket Number: No. 4105
Parties: WALKOVIC et, Appellees, v. ABOOD, Appellant.
Judges: STEVENS, PJ, HUNSICKER, J, and DOYLE, J, concur.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 71
Pages: 397–398

Head Matter:
WALKOVIC et, Appellees, v. ABOOD, Appellant.
Ohio Appeals, Ninth District, Summit County.
No. 4105.
Decided June 28, 1950.
Knowlton & Wilson, Akron, and R. Bruce Sanderson, Akron, for appellees.
E. F. Trunko, Akron, for appellant.

Opinion:
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
The appellant herein (defendant below) filed his notice of appeal to this court in the instant case on questions of law and fact. An examination of the pleadings discloses that the action in the trial court was not a chancery case but was one in which a money judgment only was sought. The appellees herein (plaintiffs below), Walkovic, et al., have not sought, by motion, to dismiss such appeal .and retain the case as an appeal on questions of law only.
Notwithstanding the failure of appellees to object to the appeal on questions of law and fact, this court, sua sponte, may, in its discretion, determine the appealability of a judgment on questions of law and fact, and may dismiss such appeal and retain the case on questions of law only.
See Hudson v. Hoster et, 37 Abs 240.
We therefore dismiss the appeal on questions of law and fact and retain the instant appeal on questions of law.- ,
We have carefully considered the pleadings, bill of exceptions and briefs filed herein, and find no error prejudicial to the rights of the appellant.
Judgment affirmed.
STEVENS, PJ, HUNSICKER, J, and DOYLE, J, concur.