Case Name: Marty L. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. S.P. HUNT, Program Coordinator; McInteer, Captain of Security, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-11-08
Citations: 204 F. App'x 324
Docket Number: No. 06-7508
Parties: Marty L. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. S.P. HUNT, Program Coordinator; McInteer, Captain of Security, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 204
Pages: 324–325

Head Matter:
Marty L. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. S.P. HUNT, Program Coordinator; McInteer, Captain of Security, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 06-7508.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 31, 2006.
Decided: Nov. 8, 2006.
Marty L. Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Marty L. Williams appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Hunt, No. 2:06-cv-00337-RAJ (E.D.Va. Aug. 22, 2006). We deny Williams' motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED