Case Name: Carol Ann VOISIN, Appellant, v. Stephen L. VOISIN, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2001-05-30
Citations: 794 So. 2d 649
Docket Number: No. 2D00-3926
Parties: Carol Ann VOISIN, Appellant, v. Stephen L. VOISIN, Appellee.
Judges: PARKER, A.C.J., and CASANUEVA, J., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 794
Pages: 649–649

Head Matter:
Carol Ann VOISIN, Appellant, v. Stephen L. VOISIN, Appellee.
No. 2D00-3926.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
May 30, 2001.
Ann O’Hern of Brasfield, Fuller, Freeman, Lovell & O’Hern, P.A., St. Peters-burg, for Appellant.
Vicki L. Kaufholz, Clearwater, for Ap-pellee.

Opinion:
NORTHCUTT, Judge.
Carol Voisin disputes a child support order that imputed income to her at a level she contended she had never earned. Because the record does not include a transcript of the evidentiary hearing or a stipulated statement of the evidence and proceedings pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b)(4), we are compelled to affirm. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979); Lynn v. Allstar Steakhouse & Sports Bar, Inc., 736 So.2d 722 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).
Affirmed.
PARKER, A.C.J., and CASANUEVA, J., Concur.