Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Guadalupe MARTINEZ FLORES, also known as J. Guadalupe Martinez, also known as Guadalupe J. Martinez, also known as J. Guadalupe Martinez-Flores, also known as Guadalupe Martinez, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-06-19
Citations: 471 F. App'x 380
Docket Number: No. 11-20585
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Guadalupe MARTINEZ FLORES, also known as J. Guadalupe Martinez, also known as Guadalupe J. Martinez, also known as J. Guadalupe Martinez-Flores, also known as Guadalupe Martinez, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 471
Pages: 380–380

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Guadalupe MARTINEZ FLORES, also known as J. Guadalupe Martinez, also known as Guadalupe J. Martinez, also known as J. Guadalupe Martinez-Flores, also known as Guadalupe Martinez, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-20585
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
June 19, 2012.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Lourdes Rodriguez, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Guadalupe Martinez Flores (Martinez) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Martinez has not filed a response and has been removed from the United States. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as frivolous, see 5th Cir. R. 42.2, and in part as moot. See United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis, 483 F.3d 381, 382-83 (5th Cir. 2007).
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.