Case Name: Leonard BOLDEN, Respondent, v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, Petitioner
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2006-03-29
Citations: 895 A.2d 526
Docket Number: 
Parties: Leonard BOLDEN, Respondent, v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, Petitioner.
Judges: Justice BALDWIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 895
Pages: 526–526

Head Matter:
Leonard BOLDEN, Respondent, v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
March 29, 2006.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 29th day of March 2006, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted. The parties are directed to address the following issue:
Whether the Commonwealth Court erred in affirming the trial court's decision that a door closing mechanism on a train is a "part and appurtenance" within the meaning of the Locomotive Inspection Act (LIA) in determining strict liability for an injury sustained by a railroad employee?
Justice BALDWIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.