Case Name: James Byron GOODSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-12-04
Citations: 608 So. 2d 943
Docket Number: No. 92-185
Parties: James Byron GOODSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: COWART and DIAMANTES, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 608
Pages: 943–944

Head Matter:
James Byron GOODSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 92-185.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Dec. 4, 1992.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and John S. Lynch, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Nancy Ryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
COBB, Judge.
Affirmed. As in Butler v. State, 608 So.2d 33 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992) we certify as being of great public importance the following question to our supreme court:
WHETHER THE CHAPTER 89-280 AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 775.-084(1)(A)1, FLORIDA STATUTES (1989), WERE UNCONSTITUTIONAL PRIOR TO THEIR REENACTMENT AS PART OF THE FLORIDA STATUTES, BECAUSE THEY WERE IN VIOLATION OF THE SINGLE SUBJECT RULE OF THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION.
We note that the supreme court has accepted jurisdiction to answer this question. McCall v. State, 593 So.2d 1052 (Fla.1992).
AFFIRMED; QUESTION CERTIFIED.
COWART and DIAMANTES, JJ., concur.