Case Name: NILS PAULSON et Ux. v. FRED H. HENRICI et Ux.
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1929-02-05
Citations: 128 Or. 414
Docket Number: 
Parties: NILS PAULSON et Ux. v. FRED H. HENRICI et Ux.
Judges: 
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 128
Pages: 414–415

Head Matter:
Argued January 30,
affirmed February 5,
rehearing denied February 26, 1929.
NILS PAULSON et Ux. v. FRED H. HENRICI et Ux.
(274 Pac. 313.)
For appellants there was a brief over the names of Mr. W. L. Mulvey and Mr. B. F. Lindas.
For respondents there was a brief over the name of Messrs. Clark, Bkulason & Clark, with an oral argument by Mr. A. E. Clark.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is a suit to restrain a continuing trespass to real property. The transcript of evidence is not here. The complaint unquestionably states a cause of suit. There is, therefore, no question which we can review. It follows that the decree of the lower court in favor of plaintiffs is affirmed.
Affirmed.