Case Name: Wade BARKER, Appellant, v. Brenda BARKER, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2003-03-07
Citations: 838 So. 2d 704
Docket Number: No. 5D02-1027
Parties: Wade BARKER, Appellant, v. Brenda BARKER, Appellee.
Judges: PETERSON, PALMER and TORPY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 838
Pages: 704–705

Head Matter:
Wade BARKER, Appellant, v. Brenda BARKER, Appellee.
No. 5D02-1027.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
March 7, 2003.
Madonna H. Whittaker, Altamonte Springs, for Appellant.
No appearance for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Wade Barker appeals a final judgment awarding him custody of the parties' two minor children, B.F.B. and K.A.B. He alleges, inter alia, that the trial court's judgment confused the names of the two children, that there were omissions on the visitation schedule attached to the final judgment and that the court further erred in not entering an income deduction order. Brenda Barker does not dispute these claims.
We affirm the trial court's custody determination and reverse for correction of judgment in regard to the names of the two children and the omissions on the visitation schedule. We further direct the trial court to file an income deduction order against the mother pursuant to section 61.1301, Florida Statutes (2002).
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART.
PETERSON, PALMER and TORPY, JJ., concur.