Case Name: The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Tucker, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1996-11-06
Citations: 77 Ohio St. 3d 49
Docket Number: No. 95-2168
Parties: The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Tucker, Appellant.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Stratton, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 77
Pages: 49–50

Head Matter:
The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Tucker, Appellant.
[Cite as State v. Tucker (1996), 77 Ohio St.3d 49.]
(No. 95-2168
Submitted September 10, 1996
Decided November 6, 1996.)
Gregory A White, Lorain County Prosecuting Attorney, and Lisa A. Locke Graves, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
Homer Tucker, pro se.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
As we held previously, Tucker has failed to show good cause for not filing his complaint about appellate representation within ninety days of journalization of the appellate judgment. See State v. Tucker, 73 Ohio St.3d 152, 652 N.E.2d 720. Moreover, Tucker has not demonstrated "a genuine issue as to whether [he] was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel on appeal" as required by App.R. 26(B)(5). Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Stratton, JJ., concur.