Case Name: Carl Lee ROBINSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R. WELLMAN; Frank O'Neal; Marvin Polk; Eddie McKoy; B. Correll, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-07-26
Citations: 234 F. App'x 70
Docket Number: No. 07-6667
Parties: Carl Lee ROBINSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R. WELLMAN; Frank O’Neal; Marvin Polk; Eddie McKoy; B. Correll, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 234
Pages: 70–70

Head Matter:
Carl Lee ROBINSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R. WELLMAN; Frank O’Neal; Marvin Polk; Eddie McKoy; B. Correll, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 07-6667.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 18, 2007.
Decided: July 26, 2007.
Carl Lee Robinson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth F. Parsons, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before MICHAEL and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Carl Lee Robinson, Jr., appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, and denying his motion for preliminary injunction, motion to amend his complaint and requests for discovery as moot. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Robinson v. Wellman, No. 5:06-ct-03102 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 12, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.