Case Name: The Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. R. Co., plaintiff in error, v. Robert James, defendant in error
Court: Nebraska Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Nebraska
Decision Date: 1889-03-20
Citations: 26 Neb. 194
Docket Number: 
Parties: The Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. R. Co., plaintiff in error, v. Robert James, defendant in error.
Judges: The other Judges concur.
Reporter: Nebraska Reports
Volume: 26
Pages: 194–194

Head Matter:
The Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. R. Co., plaintiff in error, v. Robert James, defendant in error.
[Filed March 20, 1889.]

Opinion:
Maxwell, J.
The facts in this case are substantially the same as in the case of the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. R. Co. v. James, just decided, and the same judgment will be entered.
The judgment of the district court is therefore affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
The other Judges concur.