Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jose Velez, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2015-01-15
Citations: 124 A.D.3d 468
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Velez, Appellant.
Judges: Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, Andrias, Moskowitz and Richter, JJ.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 124
Pages: 468–469

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Velez, Appellant.
[1 NYS3d 87] —

Opinion:
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Steven Lloyd Barrett, J.), rendered December 12, 2012, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of enterprise corruption and promoting gambling in the first degree, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of IV2 to 4V2 years, unanimously affirmed. The matter is remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).
The court properly denied defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea (see People v Frederick, 45 NY2d 520 [1978]). The record establishes that defendant's plea was knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily entered. Defendant's claims that the attorney who represented him at the time of the plea rendered ineffective assistance, and that defendant was under the influence of medication, were conclusory, unsubstantiated and contradicted by the record. The court properly relied on its familiarity with the plea allocution and other proceedings. The prior attorney negotiated a favorable disposition (see People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404 [1995]), and neither defendant nor his new attorney cast any doubt on the prior attorney's effectiveness.
There was nothing improper about the court's participation in the plea bargaining process, which, in any event, led to terms more favorable to defendant than the People had offered.
Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, Andrias, Moskowitz and Richter, JJ.