Case Name: Kathleen BROWN, Appellant, v. CENTRAL DISTRICT ALARM, INC. and Division of Employment Security, Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2015-11-17
Citations: 476 S.W.3d 310
Docket Number: No. ED 102802
Parties: Kathleen BROWN, Appellant, v. CENTRAL DISTRICT ALARM, INC. and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.
Judges: Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J. and Angela T. Quigless, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 476
Pages: 310–310

Head Matter:
Kathleen BROWN, Appellant, v. CENTRAL DISTRICT ALARM, INC. and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.
No. ED 102802
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Filed: November 17, 2015
Kathleen, Brown — Pro Se, 6519 Fyler Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri 63139, for Appellant.
Larry Raymond Ruhmanri, 421 East Dunklin Street, PO Box 59, Jefferson City, Missouri 65104, Kevin A. Sullivan, Sauter Sullivan, LLC, 3415 Hampton Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri 63189, Michael' Knepper, Simon Passanante, P.C., 701 Market Street, Suite 1450, St. Louis, Missouri 63101, for Respondent.
Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J. and Angela T. Quigless, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Kathleen Brown appeals the Labor and Industrial Commission's decision denying her unemployment benefits. In a single point on appeal, Brown argues that the Commission erred in determining that she did not act in good faith when voluntarily terminating her employment.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and have determined that an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. Rule 84.16(b).