Case Name: Angela BERNHARDT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOS ANGELES COUNTY; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-06-17
Citations: 101 F. App'x 244
Docket Number: No. 04-55385; D.C. No. CV-99-10121-GHK
Parties: Angela BERNHARDT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOS ANGELES COUNTY; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before KOZINSKI, LEAVY, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 101
Pages: 244–245

Head Matter:
Angela BERNHARDT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOS ANGELES COUNTY; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 04-55385. D.C. No. CV-99-10121-GHK.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 15, 2004.
Decided June 17, 2004.
Michael R. Mitchell, Woodland Hills, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Lauren M. Black, Office of the County Counsel, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants Appellee.
Before KOZINSKI, LEAVY, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Angela Bernhardt appeals the district court's order denying her motion to modify a preliminary injunction entered pursuant to this court's instructions in a prior appeal. See Bernhardt v. Los Angeles County, 339 F.3d 920, 932 (9th Cir.2003). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1). The appeal comes to this panel pursuant to 9th Cir. R. 3-3, the previous panel having declined jurisdiction.
Our review of an order regarding a preliminary injunction is "limited and deferential," and the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to expand the preliminary injunction. Southwest Voter Registration Educ. Project v. Shelley, 344 F.3d 914, 917-18 (9th Cir.2003) (en banc). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.