Case Name: Daniel POTTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1998-05-27
Citations: 710 So. 2d 754
Docket Number: No. 97-1259
Parties: Daniel POTTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: STONE, C.J., and FARMER and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 710
Pages: 754–754

Head Matter:
Daniel POTTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 97-1259.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
May 27, 1998.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Marcy K. Allen, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ettie Feistmann, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for ap-pellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The state acknowledges that the written adjudication erroneously reflects that Appellant was found guilty as to count I. The trial court, recognizing that it could not sentence Appellant on both count I and count II, orally adjudicated him guilty only with regard to counts II, III, and IV. We recognize that the court did not sentence Appellant as to count I; nevertheless, we reverse and remand so that the trial court may vacate the adjudication as to count I. In all other respects, the judgment and sentence are affirmed.
STONE, C.J., and FARMER and GROSS, JJ., concur.