Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Harold SCOTT, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-09-28
Citations: 9 S.W.3d 624
Docket Number: No. ED 75006
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Harold SCOTT, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS and ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 9
Pages: 624–624

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Harold SCOTT, Defendant-Appellant.
No. ED 75006.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Sept. 28, 1999.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 5, 2000.
Application for Transfer Denied Feb. 22, 2000.
Nancy L. Vincent, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Wade Thomas, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS and ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Harold Scott (Defendant) appeals from a judgment of conviction on two counts of first-degree robbery, Section 569.020, RSMo 1994; one count of first-degree assault, Section 565.050, RSMo 1994; and three counts of armed criminal action, Section 571.015, RSMo 1994. Defendant was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to six concurrent terms of thirty years' imprisonment.
We have reviewed the' briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).