Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Libellant, Appellee, v. 20 CASES, MORE OR LESS, EACH CONTAINING 48 PACKAGES OF AN ARTICLE LABELLED IN PART: (Pkg.) "BUITONI 20% PROTEIN SPAGHETTI NET WGT. 8 OZ." Buitoni Foods Corp. (Formerly Buitoni Products, Inc.), Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1956-01-03
Citations: 228 F.2d 912
Docket Number: No. 11688
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Libellant, Appellee, v. 20 CASES, MORE OR LESS, EACH CONTAINING 48 PACKAGES OF AN ARTICLE LABELLED IN PART: (Pkg.) “BUITONI 20% PROTEIN SPAGHETTI NET WGT. 8 OZ.” Buitoni Foods Corp. (Formerly Buitoni Products, Inc.), Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 228
Pages: 912–912

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Libellant, Appellee, v. 20 CASES, MORE OR LESS, EACH CONTAINING 48 PACKAGES OF AN ARTICLE LABELLED IN PART: (Pkg.) “BUITONI 20% PROTEIN SPAGHETTI NET WGT. 8 OZ.” Buitoni Foods Corp. (Formerly Buitoni Products, Inc.), Appellant.
No. 11688.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued Dec. 8, 1955.
Decided Jan. 3, 1956.
William Poole, Wilmington, . Del. (Berl, Potter & Anderson, Wilmington, Del., Parker H. Jones, Washington, D. C., on the brief), for appellant.
Leonard D. Hardy, Sp. Asst, to U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C. (Warren Olney, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., Leonard G. Hag-ner, U. S. Atty., Wilmington, Dei, Alvin L. Gottlieb, Attorney Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Washington, D. C., H. Newton White, Asst. U. S. Atty., Wilmington, Dei, on the brief), for appellee.
Stephen E. Hamilton, Jr., Wilmington, Dei (H. Thomas Austern, Hamilton Carothers, Washington, D. C., of counsel), for National Macaroni Manufacturers Ass’n, amicus curiae.
Before McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this libel for the misbranding of an article of food brought under 21 U.S.C.A. § 343(g) (1) the opinions of Chief Judge Leahy in the district court completely and correctly dispose of the case.
The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.
. 130 F.Supp. 715.