Case Name: L. R. THOMAS and J. H. ANDERSEN, Copartners, Doing Business Under the Firm Name of THOMAS & ANDERSEN and G. F. HANSBEOUGH, Respondents, v. D. W. STANDROD & COMPANY, Bankers, E. W. PORTER, Commissioner of Finance, and K. L. SCOTT, His Deputy, Appellants
Court: Idaho Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Idaho
Decision Date: 1926-10-11
Citations: 43 Idaho 157
Docket Number: 
Parties: L. R. THOMAS and J. H. ANDERSEN, Copartners, Doing Business Under the Firm Name of THOMAS & ANDERSEN and G. F. HANSBEOUGH, Respondents, v. D. W. STANDROD & COMPANY, Bankers, E. W. PORTER, Commissioner of Finance, and K. L. SCOTT, His Deputy, Appellants.
Judges: Wm. E. Lee, C. J., and Budge and Givens, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Idaho Reports
Volume: 43
Pages: 157–158

Head Matter:
(October 11, 1926.)
L. R. THOMAS and J. H. ANDERSEN, Copartners, Doing Business Under the Firm Name of THOMAS & ANDERSEN and G. F. HANSBEOUGH, Respondents, v. D. W. STANDROD & COMPANY, Bankers, E. W. PORTER, Commissioner of Finance, and K. L. SCOTT, His Deputy, Appellants.
[249 Pac. 900.]
Thomas & Andersen and G. F. Hansbrough, for Eespondents.
Eoy L. Black, for Appellants.
Counsel rely upon authorities cited by them in Hansbrough v. D. W. Standrod & Co., ante, p. 119.

Opinion:
LEE, District Judge.
This case is controlled in principle by the decision just announced in G. F. Hansbrough v. D. W. Standrod & Company, a Corporation, and F. W. Porter, Commissioner of Finance, ante, p. 119, 249 Pac. 897.
The judgment should be affirmed as to the award of #2,500 but reversed as to the declaration of a trust and the imposition of a lien on the bank's massed assets and the case remanded with instructions to enter judgment declaring a lien in respondents' favor upon the specific stock, ordering the same to be sold and any deficiency to be satisfied by the commissioner out of the funds subject to the provisions of subdivision 4, sec. 13, c. 42, of the Session Laws of 1921.
Wm. E. Lee, C. J., and Budge and Givens, JJ., concur.