Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Randy James JANGULA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-05-18
Citations: 473 F. App'x 595
Docket Number: Nos. 11-30334, 11-30335
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Randy James JANGULA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 473
Pages: 595–595

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Randy James JANGULA, Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 11-30334, 11-30335.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 15, 2012.
Filed May 18, 2012.
Rebekah J. French, Assistant U.S., Carl E. Rostad, Assistant U.S., USGF-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Great Falls, MT, Leif Johnson, Assistant U.S., USBI-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Billings, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
David F. Ness, Assistant Federal Public Defender, FDMT-Federal Defenders of Montana, Great Falls, MT, for Defendants Appellant.
Before: CANBY, GRABER, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
In these consolidated cases, Randy James Jangula appeals from the consecutive 12-month sentences imposed following revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Jangula contends that his aggregate sentence is substantively unreasonable. In light of the totality of the circumstances and the sentencing factors enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e), the sentence is substantively reasonable. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 993 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.