Case Name: Michael P.L. GREGG-WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EFC TRADE INC.; Duncan M. Anderson; James Herbst; Jennifer Yarnell; Abraham J. Turner; Romi Y. Robinson; Leland M. Caulder, Jr., Defendants-Appellees, and South Carolina Department of Employment and Workforce, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-02-28
Citations: 557 F. App'x 244
Docket Number: No. 13-2266
Parties: Michael P.L. GREGG-WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EFC TRADE INC.; Duncan M. Anderson; James Herbst; Jennifer Yarnell; Abraham J. Turner; Romi Y. Robinson; Leland M. Caulder, Jr., Defendants-Appellees, and South Carolina Department of Employment and Workforce, Defendant.
Judges: Before KEENAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 557
Pages: 244–245

Head Matter:
Michael P.L. GREGG-WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EFC TRADE INC.; Duncan M. Anderson; James Herbst; Jennifer Yarnell; Abraham J. Turner; Romi Y. Robinson; Leland M. Caulder, Jr., Defendants-Appellees, and South Carolina Department of Employment and Workforce, Defendant.
No. 13-2266.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 21, 2014.
Decided: Feb. 28, 2014.
Michael P.L. Gregg-Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. John Stanley Lord, Jr., Foley & Lardner LLP, Orlando, Florida; David Thomas Duff, Duff, White & Turner, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before KEENAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael P.L. Gregg-Wilson appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and Gregg-Wilson's informal brief on appeal, and we conclude that this appeal is frivolous. See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325, 327, 109 S.Ct. 1827,104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989); Gregg-Wilson v. EFC Trade Inc., No. 3:12-cv-02923-TLW (D.S.C. filed Sept. 13, 2013; entered Sept. 16, 2013). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.