Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Anthony Gerald WHITE, Sr., a/k/a Tony, Defendant - Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-07-27
Citations: 329 F. App'x 484
Docket Number: No. 09-6017
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Anthony Gerald WHITE, Sr., a/k/a Tony, Defendant — Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 329
Pages: 484–485

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Anthony Gerald WHITE, Sr., a/k/a Tony, Defendant — Appellant.
No. 09-6017.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 23, 2009.
Decided: July 27, 2009.
Anthony Gerald White, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Jane Meadowcroft Erisman, Christopher John Romano, Assistant United States Attorneys, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Gerald White, Sr., seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of a prior order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2009) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006); Reid v. Angelone, 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir.2004). A certificate of appeal-ability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that White has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeala-bility and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.