Case Name: Lonnie SNELLING, Appellant, v. Lloyd STEPHENSON, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1991-10-29
Citations: 818 S.W.2d 722
Docket Number: No. 58744
Parties: Lonnie SNELLING, Appellant, v. Lloyd STEPHENSON, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 818
Pages: 722–722

Head Matter:
Lonnie SNELLING, Appellant, v. Lloyd STEPHENSON, Respondent.
No. 58744.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Oct. 29, 1991.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 18, 1991.
Application to Transfer Denied Dec. 17, 1991.
Lonnie Snelling, pro se.
Lloyd Stephenson, pro se.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
This is an action in slander. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered in favor of defendant after a court tried case. The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).