Case Name: Donald Kenneth FETTERLY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. David PASKETT, Warden, Idaho State Prisons; and Jim Jones, Attorney General of the State of Idaho, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1994-01-24
Citations: 15 F.3d 1472
Docket Number: No. 90-35627
Parties: Donald Kenneth FETTERLY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. David PASKETT, Warden, Idaho State Prisons; and Jim Jones, Attorney General of the State of Idaho, Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: Before: SCHROEDER, LEAVY, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 15
Pages: 1472–1484

Head Matter:
Donald Kenneth FETTERLY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. David PASKETT, Warden, Idaho State Prisons; and Jim Jones, Attorney General of the State of Idaho, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 90-35627.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Jan. 24, 1994.
Amended March 8, 1994.
Before: SCHROEDER, LEAVY, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
The panel has voted to deny appellees' petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc.
The full court was advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc. An active judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter faded to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en bane consideration. Fed.RApp.P. 35. Judges Kozinski, Hall, and Wiggins would grant the suggestion for rehearing en banc.
The petition for rehearing is denied and the suggestion for rehearing en bane is rejected.