Case Name: In the Matter of New York State Teachers' Retirement System, Respondent, v. Robert Z. Srogi, as Commissioner of Assessment of the City of Syracuse, et al., Appellants
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1982-05-06
Citations: 56 N.Y.2d 690
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of New York State Teachers’ Retirement System, Respondent, v Robert Z. Srogi, as Commissioner of Assessment of the City of Syracuse, et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 56
Pages: 690–692

Head Matter:
In the Matter of New York State Teachers’ Retirement System, Respondent, v Robert Z. Srogi, as Commissioner of Assessment of the City of Syracuse, et al., Appellants.
Decided May 6, 1982
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
David M. Garber, Corporation Counsel (Eleanor Theodore of counsel), for appellants.
Harry L. Du Brin, Jr., and Karl E. Nisoff for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (84 AD2d 912).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.