Case Name: IN RE: CAPITAL OPTIONS, LLC, Debtor, Capital Options, LLC, Appellant, v. C. Dennis Loomis; et al., Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-01-10
Citations: 708 F. App'x 481
Docket Number: No. 16-60053
Parties: IN RE: CAPITAL OPTIONS, LLC, Debtor, Capital Options, LLC, Appellant, v. C. Dennis Loomis; et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before: WALLACE, CALLAHAN, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Bankruptcy Reporter
Volume: 580
Pages: 481–482

Head Matter:
IN RE: CAPITAL OPTIONS, LLC, Debtor, Capital Options, LLC, Appellant, v. C. Dennis Loomis; et al., Appellees.
No. 16-60053
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted October 17, 2017 San Francisco, California
Filed January 10, 2018
H. Lee Horner, Jr., Esquire, Goldstein, Horner & Horner, Cortaro, AZ, for Appellant
Steven D. Jerome, Attorney, Snell & Wilmer L.L.P., Phoenix, AZ, for Appellees C. Dennis Loomis, Baker Hostetler, LLP
.Warren John Stapleton, Esquire, Attorney, Osborn Maledon, PA, Phoenix, AZ, for Appellee George H. Goldsmith
Before: WALLACE, CALLAHAN, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
This is an appeal by Capital Options, LLC (Capital) from the Bankruptcy Court's order denying confirmation of a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization that was to be funded by the proceeds of' Capital's adversary proceedings against George H. Goldsmith and G2, LLC. The Bankruptcy Court, having dismissed Capital's adversary proceeding with prejudice, found the reorganization plan to be infeasible under 11 U.S.C. § 1129(a), and also dismissed the administrative, proceeding.
The denial of confirmation of a Chapter 11 reorganization plan is reviewed for abuse of discretion. See In re Marshall, 721 F.3d 1032, 1045 (9th Cir. 2013). In a contemporaneously filed memorandum disposition in In re Capital Options, LLC, No. 15-60054, we affirm the Bankruptcy Court's dismissal of the Capital's adversary proceeding. As this confirms the Bankruptcy Court's determination that the reorganization plan was infeasible, the Bankruptcy Court's denial of the confirmation plan is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.