Case Name: Robert J. BARKER and Jane Barker, Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-09-15
Citations: 976 S.W.2d 603
Docket Number: No. 73112
Parties: Robert J. BARKER and Jane Barker, Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before PUDLOWSKI, B.J., and CRANDALL and AHRENS, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 976
Pages: 603–603

Head Matter:
Robert J. BARKER and Jane Barker, Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant/Appellant.
No. 73112.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Sept. 15, 1998.
Idaline L. Hall, St. Louis, for appellant.
Mark A. Ludwig, Douglas W. Hennon, Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before PUDLOWSKI, B.J., and CRANDALL and AHRENS, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
In this negligence action, Union Electric Company (UE) appeals from the denial of its motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict or for a New Trial brought after a jury verdict and judgment for respondents, Robert J. Barker and Jane Barker (Barkers).
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss Appeal and for Damages for Frivolous Appeal is denied.