Case Name: L.R. WRIGHT; Gary Wright, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-02-28
Citations: 172 F. App'x 13
Docket Number: No. 05-2157
Parties: L.R. WRIGHT; Gary Wright, Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 172
Pages: 13–14

Head Matter:
L.R. WRIGHT; Gary Wright, Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 05-2157.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 23, 2006.
Decided: Feb. 28, 2006.
L.R. Wright, and Gary Wright, Appellants Pro Se.
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
L.R. Wright and Gary Wright appeal the district court's order dismissing their complaint without prejudice for failing to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Wright v. Transportation Security Admin., No. CA-05-1048-1 (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 30, 2005, entered Oct. 3, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.