Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Darrell LARIMORE, Appellant; Darrell LARIMORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1994-09-13
Citations: 883 S.W.2d 115
Docket Number: Nos. 61761, 64591
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Darrell LARIMORE, Appellant. Darrell LARIMORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANE, P.J., GRIMM, C.J., and CRANDALL, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 883
Pages: 115–116

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Darrell LARIMORE, Appellant. Darrell LARIMORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 61761, 64591.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Sept. 13, 1994.
Gary E. Brotherton, Matthew J. O’Connor, Public Defenders, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Traci J. Sanders, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before CRANE, P.J., GRIMM, C.J., and CRANDALL, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Darrell Larimore appeals his conviction for second degree burglary, in violation of § 569.170 RSMo (1986), and stealing, in violation of § 570.030 RSMo (1986). Larimore also appeals from an order denying his 29.15 motion on the merits after an evidentiary hearing. The motion court's judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b) and Rule 84.16(b).