Case Name: Clarence D. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-07-12
Citations: 532 F. App'x 414
Docket Number: No. 13-1551
Parties: Clarence D. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 532
Pages: 414–415

Head Matter:
Clarence D. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 13-1551.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 24, 2013.
Decided: July 12, 2013.
Clarence D. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Clarence D. Johnson appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Johnson v. Wells Fargo, No. l:13-cv 00419-LMB-IDD (E.D.Va. Apr. 10, 2013). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.