Case Name: NAYLOR & NAYLOR COMPANY and Transcontinental Insurance Company, Petitioners, v. Emil MALKA and The Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1957-02-13
Citations: 92 So. 2d 632
Docket Number: 
Parties: NAYLOR & NAYLOR COMPANY and Transcontinental Insurance Company, Petitioners, v. Emil MALKA and The Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
Judges: TERRELL, C. J., and HOBSON, DREW and THORNAL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 92
Pages: 632–633

Head Matter:
NAYLOR & NAYLOR COMPANY and Transcontinental Insurance Company, Petitioners, v. Emil MALKA and The Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
Supreme Court of Florida, Division B.
Feb. 13, 1957.
Blackwell, Walker & Gray, Miami, for petitioners.
William Burton, Jr., Drummond Paul, Jr., Miami, Burnis T. Coleman and Rodney Durrance, Tallahassee, for respondents'.-

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The motion to quash the petition for writ of certiorari in this cause has been duly made upon the ground that the order of the full commission sought to be reviewed here does not possess the element of finality which is a prerequisite to judicial review. Upon consideration of said motion and after argument of counsel, the court is of the view that there has been no final administrative determination of the matters in controversy and that, therefore, the motion to quash should be and the same is hereby granted.
TERRELL, C. J., and HOBSON, DREW and THORNAL, JJ., concur.