Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Israel SAENZ, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-01-09
Citations: 213 F. App'x 293
Docket Number: No. 06-40880
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Israel SAENZ, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 213
Pages: 293–294

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Israel SAENZ, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-40880.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Jan. 9, 2007.
Israel Saenz, Jr., Pollock, LA, pro se.
Jose A Flores, Jr., U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Laredo, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
In this case filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, the district court entered a final judgment dismissing the action on April 5, 2006. On April 20, 2006, the petitioner filed a pro se notice of appeal from the final judgment. In his request for a certificate of appealability, the petitioner noted that the district court failed to address one of the issues in his motion. On May 15, 2006, the district court entered an order vacating its earlier final judgment dismissing the case and restoring the case on the docket.
The district court was divested of jurisdiction by the filing of a timely notice of appeal. See Alvestad v. Monsanto Co., 671 F.2d 908, 911 n. 2 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1070, 103 S.Ct. 489, 74 L.Ed.2d 632 (1982). This court has received a request from the district court to remand the case so that it can address the remaining issue in the § 2255 motion. We remand the case to the district court to reenter its judgment and conduct such further proceedings as may be necessary. See Willie v. Continental Oil Co., 746 F.2d 1041, 1046 (5th Cir.1984), vacated by grant of rehearing en banc, 760 F.2d 87 (5th Cir.1985), on rehearing, 784 F.2d 706 (5th Cir.1986) (en banc). See also Travelers Ins. Co. v. Liljeberg Enterprises, Inc., 38 F.3d 1404, 1407 n. 3 (5th Cir.1994) (citing panel opinion in Willie). We do not retain jurisdiction.
REMANDED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.