Case Name: In the Matter of the Application of William A. Carroll, Petitioner, Respondent, against S. Howard Cohen and Others, Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Defendants, and Henry Vander Velde, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1941-10-29
Citations: 262 A.D. 481
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Application of William A. Carroll, Petitioner, Respondent, against S. Howard Cohen and Others, Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Defendants, and Henry Vander Velde, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 262
Pages: 481–482

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Application of William A. Carroll, Petitioner, Respondent, against S. Howard Cohen and Others, Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Defendants, and Henry Vander Velde, Appellant.
First Department,
October 29, 1941.
Daniel J. Downing, for the appellant.
John T. Dooling, for the respondent.
Russell Lord Tarbox, for the Board of Elections of the City of New York.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The petitions herein were sufficient. They contained a statement that the signers were duly qualified voters who had registered to vote in the borough of Manhattan, city of New York, within eighteen months previous to the filing of the petition. In this respect the petitions differed from those considered in Matter of Goldberg v. Cohen (257 App. Div. 675; affd., 281 N. Y. 776). As we indicated in the case cited, there is no express requirement in the statute that the address of registration be given.
The order appealed from should be reversed and the motion denied.
Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion denied.