Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Randolph E. DAWSON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-02-07
Citations: 26 F. App'x 347
Docket Number: No. 01-7521
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Randolph E. DAWSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 26
Pages: 347–348

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Randolph E. DAWSON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 01-7521.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 31, 2002.
Decided Feb. 7, 2002.
Randolph E. Dawson, Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MIC}IAEL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Randolph E. Dawson appeals from the district court's order denying his "Motion for Writ of Mandamus." We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Dawson, No. CR-99-88 (E.D.Va. Aug. 17, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.