Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Demetrius Shawndale RUDISILL, a/k/a Cat, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-06-25
Citations: 474 F. App'x 264
Docket Number: No. 12-6132
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Demetrius Shawndale RUDISILL, a/k/a Cat, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 474
Pages: 264–264

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Demetrius Shawndale RUDISILL, a/k/a Cat, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 12-6132.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 21, 2012.
Decided: June 25, 2012.
Demetrius Shawndale Rudisill, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Demetrius Shawndale Rudisill appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. United States v. Rudisill, 3:05-cr-00390-RJC-5 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 18, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.