Case Name: Dora Rubenstein et al., Respondents, v. Bernard R. Silbert, Defendant. (Action No. 1.); Dora Rubenstein et al., Respondents, v. Incorporated Village of Valley Stream, Appellant. (Action No. 2.)
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1952-02-25
Citations: 279 A.D. 878
Docket Number: 
Parties: Dora Rubenstein et al., Respondents, v. Bernard R. Silbert, Defendant. (Action No. 1.) Dora Rubenstein et al., Respondents, v. Incorporated Village of Valley Stream, Appellant. (Action No. 2.)
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 279
Pages: 878–879

Head Matter:
Dora Rubenstein et al., Respondents, v. Bernard R. Silbert, Defendant. (Action No. 1.) Dora Rubenstein et al., Respondents, v. Incorporated Village of Valley Stream, Appellant. (Action No. 2.)

Opinion:
The affidavit in support of the motion shows no facts which should lead the court in its discretion to override the provisions of section 341-e of the Village Law. (Bagan v. Fritz, 274 App. Div. 1082.) Carswell, Acting P. J., Adel, Wenzel, MacCrate and Schmidt, JJ., concur. [200 Misc. 399.]