Case Name: Homer OVERLY (Citizen of Florida), Appellant, v. Elmer OVERLY, and Elmer Overly, Trustee (Citizen of Pennsylvania), Overly Manufacturing Company, a Corporation of Pennsylvania (a Citizen of Pennsylvania), Alice R. WEHE and Herbert W. Wehe, Individuals (citizens of Pennsylvania)
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1946-12-27
Citations: 158 F.2d 384
Docket Number: No. 9198
Parties: Homer OVERLY (Citizen of Florida), Appellant, v. Elmer OVERLY, and Elmer Overly, Trustee (Citizen of Pennsylvania), Overly Manufacturing Company, a Corporation of Pennsylvania (a Citizen of Pennsylvania), Alice R. WEHE and Herbert W. Wehe, Individuals (citizens of Pennsylvania).
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 158
Pages: 384–385

Head Matter:
Homer OVERLY (Citizen of Florida), Appellant, v. Elmer OVERLY, and Elmer Overly, Trustee (Citizen of Pennsylvania), Overly Manufacturing Company, a Corporation of Pennsylvania (a Citizen of Pennsylvania), Alice R. WEHE and Herbert W. Wehe, Individuals (citizens of Pennsylvania).
No. 9198.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Argued Dec. 20, 1946.
Decided Dec. 27, 1946.
Robert VanderVoort, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellant.
Elder W. Marshall, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellees.
Before GOODRICH and McLAUGH-LIN, Circuit Judges, and MURPHY, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is an action to establish an alleged oral trust in personal property. The District Court, 65 F.Supp. 174, found against the plaintiff and this finding is the subject of appeal. The questions involved are wholly those of fact; the parties have no substantial dispute on the legal points. We have examined the record upon the matters concerning which the appellant claims that the conclusions of the trial court were clearly erroneous. The facts do not, in our opinion, bear out the claim. The judgment is therefore affirmed.