Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Miguel Angel IMBODEN-VALLEJO, also known as Luis Fernando Pineda, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-02-22
Citations: 681 F. App'x 303
Docket Number: No. 16-40866
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Miguel Angel IMBODEN-VALLEJO, also known as Luis Fernando Pineda, Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before JOLLY, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 681
Pages: 303–303

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Miguel Angel IMBODEN-VALLEJO, also known as Luis Fernando Pineda, Defendant-Appellant
No. 16-40866
Conference Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed February 22, 2017
Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Miguel Angel Imboden-Vallejo, Pro Se
Before JOLLY, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Miguel Angel Imboden-Valle-jo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Imboden-Vallejo has submitted an unauthorized appellate brief, which we construe as a motion for leave to file an out-of-time response and GRANT.
We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record re-fleeted therein, as well as Imboden-Valle-jo's response. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cm. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.