Case Name: In the Matter of Rudolph M. Klenosky, Appellant, v. New York City Police Department et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1981-03-31
Citations: 53 N.Y.2d 685
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Rudolph M. Klenosky, Appellant, v New York City Police Department et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 53
Pages: 685–686

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Rudolph M. Klenosky, Appellant, v New York City Police Department et al., Respondents.
Decided March 31, 1981
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Rudolph M. Klenosky, appellant pro se.
Allen G. Schwartz, Corporation Counsel (Joan E. Handler of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On summary consideration, order affirmed, without costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (75 AD2d.793; see, also, Tdbankin v Codd, 40 NY2d 893).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.