Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Clyde ROWE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-04-02
Citations: 272 F. App'x 372
Docket Number: No. 07-11014
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Clyde ROWE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 272
Pages: 372–373

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Clyde ROWE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-11014
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 2, 2008.
Rick Calvert, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Jason Douglas Hawkins, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Clyde Rowe raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Hinson, 429 F.3d 114, 119 (5th Cir.2005), which held that a defendant is not entitled to a jury trial to determine whether the terms of supervised release have been violated. The Government's motion for summary af- firmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.