Case Name: Ronald BURSTON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2014-03-18
Citations: 424 S.W.3d 483
Docket Number: No. ED 99735
Parties: Ronald BURSTON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Lisa S. VAN AMBURG, P.J., PATRICIA L. COHEN, J., and PHILIP M. HESS, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 424
Pages: 483–484

Head Matter:
Ronald BURSTON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 99735.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
March 18, 2014.
Gwenda R. Robinson, Missouri Public Defenders Office, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before Lisa S. VAN AMBURG, P.J., PATRICIA L. COHEN, J., and PHILIP M. HESS, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Ronald Burston (Movant) appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. In his sole point on appeal, Movant asserts that counsel rendered ineffective assistance by fail ing to inform Movant of a four-year sentence plea offer. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court did not clearly err in denying post-conviction relief. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).