Case Name: THE STATE, CAROLINE M. DARCY, PROSECUTRIX, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. HENRY G. DARCY ET AL., DEFENDANT IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1889-11
Citations: 52 N.J.L. 222
Docket Number: 
Parties: THE STATE, CAROLINE M. DARCY, PROSECUTRIX, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. HENRY G. DARCY ET AL., DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 52
Pages: 222–222

Head Matter:
THE STATE, CAROLINE M. DARCY, PROSECUTRIX, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. HENRY G. DARCY ET AL., DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
On error to the Supreme Court.
For opinion of the Supreme Court, see 22 Vroom 140.
For the plaintiff in error, Robt. H. McCarter.
For the defendant in error, Joseph Coult.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed,, for the reasons given by that court.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Dixon, Garrison, Knapp, Magie, Yan Syckel, Brown, Clement, Cole, McGregor, Smith, Whitaker. 13.
For reversal—None.