Case Name: Ryan J. SIMMONS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2017-09-15
Citations: 226 So. 3d 362
Docket Number: Case No. 2D16-3871
Parties: Ryan J. SIMMONS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: MORRIS and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 226
Pages: 362–363

Head Matter:
Ryan J. SIMMONS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Case No. 2D16-3871
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Opinion filed September 15, 2017.
Ryan J. Simmons, pro se.

Opinion:
LaROSE, Chief Judge.
Ryan J. Simmons, pro se, appeals the postconviction court's order summarily denying his motion for return of property. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2); Bolden v. State, 875 So.2d 780, 782 n.3 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). The postconviction court denied the motion as untimely but failed to attach the judgment and sentence. We reverse and remand for the postconviction court to attach portions of the record that conclusively refute Mr. Simmons' claim or hold an evidentiary hearing on the matter. See Almeda v. State, 959 So.2d 806, 809 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) ("[I]f the circuit court deemed the motion's allegations to be facially sufficient, the circuit court should have either attached portions of the record that conclusively refuted Mr. Almeda's claim or held an evidentiary hearing."); Stevens v. State, 929 So.2d 1197, 1197 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006).
Reversed and remanded with instructions.
MORRIS and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.