Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Carlos Alberto ESQUIVEL, also known as Roman Perez-Ramirez, also known as Jojan Velasques, also known as Jojan Velasquez, also known as Juan Jose Esquivel, also known as Johan Velasquez, also known as Carlos Canales, also known as Carlos Esquivel Lopez, also known as Carlos Esquovela, also known as Jose Juan Esquivel, also known as Carlos Esquivel, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-06-19
Citations: 471 F. App'x 380
Docket Number: No. 11-20593
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Carlos Alberto ESQUIVEL, also known as Roman Perez-Ramirez, also known as Jojan Velasques, also known as Jojan Velasquez, also known as Juan Jose Esquivel, also known as Johan Velasquez, also known as Carlos Canales, also known as Carlos Esquivel Lopez, also known as Carlos Esquovela, also known as Jose Juan Esquivel, also known as Carlos Esquivel, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 471
Pages: 380–381

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Carlos Alberto ESQUIVEL, also known as Roman Perez-Ramirez, also known as Jojan Velasques, also known as Jojan Velasquez, also known as Juan Jose Esquivel, also known as Johan Velasquez, also known as Carlos Canales, also known as Carlos Esquivel Lopez, also known as Carlos Esquovela, also known as Jose Juan Esquivel, also known as Carlos Esquivel, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-20593
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
June 19, 2012.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Margaret Christina Ling, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Molly Estelle Odom, Esq., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Carlos Alberto Esquivel has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Esquivel has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.