Case Name: NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION, et al., Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al. (Two Cases); Peter G. CRANE, et al., Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al.; NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION, et al. v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Appellants; AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, et al., v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Appellants; Peter G. CRANE, et al., v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1993-09-21
Citations: 3 F.3d 1555
Docket Number: Nos. 92-5085, 92-5139, 92-5170, 92-5235, 92-5236 and 92-5237
Parties: NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION, et al., Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al. (Two Cases). Peter G. CRANE, et al., Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al. NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION, et al. v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Appellants. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, et al., v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Appellants. Peter G. CRANE, et al., v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Appellants.
Judges: Before: MIKVA, Chief Judge, WALD, EDWARDS, SILBERMAN, BUCKLEY, WILLIAMS, D.H. GINSBURG, SENTELLE, HENDERSON, and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 3
Pages: 1555–1568

Head Matter:
NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION, et al., Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al. (Two Cases). Peter G. CRANE, et al., Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al. NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION, et al. v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Appellants. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, et al., v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Appellants. Peter G. CRANE, et al., v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Appellants.
Nos. 92-5085, 92-5139, 92-5170, 92-5235, 92-5236 and 92-5237.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Sept. 21, 1993.
Before: MIKVA, Chief Judge, WALD, EDWARDS, SILBERMAN, BUCKLEY, WILLIAMS, D.H. GINSBURG, SENTELLE, HENDERSON, and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc of the United States and the response thereto have been circulated to the full Court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the Court in regular active service did not vote in favor of the suggestion. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is
ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the suggestion is denied.
Circuit Judge SENTELLE would grant the suggestion for rehearing .en banc.
Separate opinion filed by Circuit Judge STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, concurring in the denial of rehearing en bane.
Separate opinion filed by Circuit Judge SILBERMAN, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc.