Case Name: Daniel W. JOHNSON v. STATE of Arkansas
Court: Arkansas Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Arkansas
Decision Date: 2000-06-01
Citations: 341 Ark. 523
Docket Number: CR 00-476
Parties: Daniel W. JOHNSON v. STATE of Arkansas
Judges: 
Reporter: Arkansas Reports
Volume: 341
Pages: 523–523

Head Matter:
Daniel W. JOHNSON v. STATE of Arkansas
CR 00-476
17 S.W.3d 499
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Opinion delivered June 1, 2000
The James Law Firm, by: Steven R. McNeely and William O. “Bill” James, Jr., for appellant.
Mark Pryor, Att’y Gen., by: C. Joseph Cordi, Jr., Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
[1] Appellant Danny W Johnson has filed a petition AM. review pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 1-2 and 2-4, stating that he is entitled to a review because the Arkansas Court of Appeals erroneously affirmed appellant's second-degree murder conviction for noncompliance with our abstracting requirements. We have determined that review is proper on the issue of whether appellant's conviction was properly affirmed for noncompliance with Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-2. Because determination of this issue involves the interpretation and application of Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2, we grant review on this question only.