Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Miguel MARTINEZ-CARRILLO, aka Andres Miguel Pascual, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-02-28
Citations: 223 F. App'x 599
Docket Number: No. 05-15623
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Miguel MARTINEZ-CARRILLO, aka Andres Miguel Pascual, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 223
Pages: 599–599

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Miguel MARTINEZ-CARRILLO, aka Andres Miguel Pascual, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-15623.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 20, 2007 .
Filed Feb. 28, 2007.
Claire Kiehl Lefkowitz, Esq. Fax, USTU — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Miguel Martinez-Carrillo, California City, CA, pro se.
Before: BEEZER, FERNANDEZ, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges,
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Federal prisoner Miguel Martinez-Carrillo appeals pro se from the district court's judgment denying his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 2253. We review de novo, United States v. Rodrigues, 347 F.3d 818, 823 (9th Cir.2003), and we affirm.
Appellant contends that his 41-month sentence for illegal reentry following removal subsequent to conviction for an aggravated felony is unconstitutional because he did not admit the fact of his prior conviction at the change-of-plea hearing. This contention is foreclosed. See United States v. Weiland, 420 F.3d 1062, 1079 n. 16 (9th Cir.2005); United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411, 415 (9th Cir. 2000).
To the extent that appellant's brief includes contentions not certified for appeal, we construe the contentions as a motion to expand the certificate of appealability, and we deny the motion. See 9th Cir. R. 22-1(e); Hiivala v. Wood, 195 F.3d 1098, 1104-05 (9th Cir.1999) (per curiam).
The Clerk shall serve a copy of this memorandum on appellant individually at his last known address: 790 West Battaglia Road, Eloy, Arizona, 85231.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.