Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Toby C. PATTERSON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-05-06
Citations: 406 F.3d 1095
Docket Number: No. 00-30306
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Toby C. PATTERSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: NOONAN, TASHIMA, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 406
Pages: 1095–1102

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Toby C. PATTERSON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 00-30306.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 6, 2005.
Nancy D. Cook, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Coeur d’Alene, ID, Alan G. Burrow, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Boise, ID, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Gerald R. Smith, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Spokane, WA, for De-fendanb-Appellant.
Before: NOONAN, TASHIMA, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER: Dissent by Judge KOZINSKI; Dissent by Judge KLEINFELD.
ORDER
The panel has voted to deny the petition for panel, rehearing, with Judge Tallman voting to grant it. Judge Tallman votes to grant the petition for rehearing en banc. Judges Noonan and Tashima recommend that the petition for rehearing en banc be denied. A judge of the court requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc, but the matter failed to receive a majority of th.e votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc rehearing.
The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED.