Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Rodney HATCHETT a/k/a Rodney Hayes, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-08-05
Citations: 111 S.W.3d 569
Docket Number: No. WD 61237
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Rodney HATCHETT a/k/a Rodney Hayes, Appellant.
Judges: Before LOWENSTEIN, P.J., and SMART and EDWIN H. SMITH, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 111
Pages: 569–570

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Rodney HATCHETT a/k/a Rodney Hayes, Appellant.
No. WD 61237.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Aug. 5, 2003.
Andrew A. Schroeder, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Dora A. Fichter, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before LOWENSTEIN, P.J., and SMART and EDWIN H. SMITH, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Rodney Hatchett appeals the judgment of his conviction, after a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Jackson County, for one count of robbery in the first degree, § 569.020; and one count of armed criminal action (ACA), § 571.015. As a result of his convictions, the appellant was sentenced to concurrent prison terms in the Missouri Department of Corrections of fifteen years for robbery and five years for ACA.
In his sole point on appeal, the appellant claims that the trial court plainly erred in failing to sua sponte grant him a new trial because the prosecutor was guilty of pros-ecutorial misconduct in intentionally misrepresenting the appellant's prior felony convictions to the jury.
Affirmed. Rule 80.25(b).