Case Name: Sheila E. BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BERKLEY STAFFING, LLC; Metro Machine Corp.; General Dynamics Corp., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-09-26
Citations: 539 F. App'x 286
Docket Number: No. 13-1305
Parties: Sheila E. BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BERKLEY STAFFING, LLC; Metro Machine Corp.; General Dynamics Corp., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 539
Pages: 286–287

Head Matter:
Sheila E. BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BERKLEY STAFFING, LLC; Metro Machine Corp.; General Dynamics Corp., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 13-1305.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 24, 2013.
Decided: Sept. 26, 2013.
Sheila E. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Elaine Inman Hogan, Howard W. Martin, Jr., Crenshaw Ware & Martin, PLC, Norfolk, Virginia; Jocelyn Renee Cuttino, Morgan Lewis & Bockius, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Sheila E. Brown appeals the district court's order dismissing her civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Berkley Staffing, LLC, No. 2:12-cv-00564-MSD-TEM (E.D.Va. Feb. 4, 2013). We deny Berkley Staffing, LLC's motion to strike Brown's informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.