Case Name: Darryl GREEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patrick CONROY, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-04-30
Citations: 33 F. App'x 132
Docket Number: No. 02-6185
Parties: Darryl GREEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patrick CONROY, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 33
Pages: 132–133

Head Matter:
Darryl GREEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patrick CONROY, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 02-6185.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 18, 2002.
Decided April 30, 2002.
Darryl Green, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Darryl Green appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint and dismissing without prejudice the complaint insofar as if could be construed as having been filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's memorandum and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Green v. Conroy, No. CA-02-92-DKC (D.Md. Jan. 17, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.