Case Name: TEAMCARE INFUSION INC., Appellant, v. COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH MANAGEMENT, INC., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2007-10-31
Citations: 970 So. 2d 385
Docket Number: No. 3D06-2223
Parties: TEAMCARE INFUSION INC., Appellant, v. COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH MANAGEMENT, INC., Appellee.
Judges: Before GERSTEN, C.J., and CORTINAS, J., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 970
Pages: 385–385

Head Matter:
TEAMCARE INFUSION INC., Appellant, v. COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH MANAGEMENT, INC., Appellee.
No. 3D06-2223.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 31, 2007.
Alan C. Gold, Miami, for appellant.
Shutts Bowen LLP and Gary M. Bagli-ebter and Sandra Upegui and Temple Fett Kearns, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
Before GERSTEN, C.J., and CORTINAS, J., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The award of sanctions under section 57.105, Florida Statutes (2006), is reversed with directions to deny the application because, as a matter of law, the facts and circumstances of the case do not demonstrate any of the statutory prerequisites for that relief. See Bowen v. Brewer, 936 So.2d 757 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006), review denied, 952 So.2d 1188 (Fla.2007); Connelly v. Old Bridge Vill. Co-Op, Inc., 915 So.2d 652 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Munoz v. City of Miami 853 So.2d 489 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Read v. Taylor, 832 So.2d 219 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). This holding pretermits the discussion of the several other, apparently meritorious, grounds asserted for reversal.
Reversed and remanded.