Case Name: Bachus et al., Appellants, v. Loral Corporation, Appellee
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1993-09-15
Citations: 67 Ohio St. 3d 300
Docket Number: No. 91-2365
Parties: Bachus et al., Appellants, v. Loral Corporation, Appellee.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Wright and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 67
Pages: 300–301

Head Matter:
Bachus et al., Appellants, v. Loral Corporation, Appellee.
[Cite as Bachus v. Loral Corp. (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 300.]
(No. 91-2365
Submitted April 6, 1993
Decided September 15, 1993.)
Michael F. Colley Co., L.P.A., Michael F. Colley, David I. Shroyer and David K. Frank, for appellants.
Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs and Charles E. Pierson, for appellee.
Ronald D. Major, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers.

Opinion:
On April 6, 1993, this matter was submitted to the court upon briefs and oral argument. On July 1, 1993, Civ.R. 34(D) became effective.
The court determines that the issue presented in this case has been disposed of with the adoption of Civ.R. 34(D) and that the issue is therefore moot.
Therefore, case No. 91-2365 is hereby dismissed.
Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Wright and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Douglas, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.