Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles Benjamin BIBBS, III, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-08-02
Citations: 478 F. App'x 753
Docket Number: No. 12-6560
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles Benjamin BIBBS, III, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 478
Pages: 753–754

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles Benjamin BIBBS, III, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-6560.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 26, 2012.
Decided: Aug. 2, 2012.
Charles Benjamin Bibbs, III, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Bradenham, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Charles Benjamin Bibbs, III, appeals the district court's order granting his motion for modification of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Bibbs, No. 4:05-cr-00032-AWA-FBS-l (E.D.Va. Mar. 14, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.