Case Name: WALTER SEDOVIC ARCHITECT, P.C., Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant, v. John A. ALESANDRO, et al., Defendants-Counterclaimants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-01-16
Citations: 237 F.3d 693
Docket Number: No. 99-9463
Parties: WALTER SEDOVIC ARCHITECT, P.C., Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant, v. John A. ALESANDRO, et al., Defendants-Counterclaimants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 237
Pages: 693–693

Head Matter:
WALTER SEDOVIC ARCHITECT, P.C., Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant, v. John A. ALESANDRO, et al., Defendants-Counterclaimants-Appellees.
No. 99-9463.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Jan. 16, 2001.

Opinion:
Present KEARSE, JACOBS and CABRANES, Circuit Judges.
Counsel for certain defendants-counter-claimants-appellees having informed this Court in or about November 2000 that the above action has been settled,
And this Court having unsuccessfully requested the parties to file a stipulation of discontinuance of the appeal, which was scheduled to be heard on January 10, 2001,
And this Court having telephoned the office of Philip Furgang, Furgang & Ad-war ("Furgang"), counsel of record for plaintiff-counterclaim-defendant-appellant ("plaintiff'), and having eventually been informed by Furgang that the matter has been settled and that written confirmation would be forthcoming from Kevin J. O'Neill, Gogic, Byrne & O'Neill ("O'Neill"), another firm representing plaintiff,
And O'Neill, having sent this Court a letter dated January 5, 2001, stating that this appeal has been rendered moot because the matter has been settled, and attaching a copy of a stipulation of dismissal filed in the district court and so-ordered by that court on December 4, 2000,
It is hereby ordered that the appeal be and it hereby is dismissed with prejudice.