Case Name: Roger W. HURLBERT, Appellant, v. Wendy NORWALD, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2015-09-08
Citations: 477 S.W.3d 114
Docket Number: No. ED 102320
Parties: Roger W. HURLBERT, Appellant, v. Wendy NORWALD, Respondent.
Judges: Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J. and Angela T. Quigless, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 477
Pages: 114–115

Head Matter:
Roger W. HURLBERT, Appellant, v. Wendy NORWALD, Respondent.
No. ED 102320
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Filed: September 8, 2015
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied November 5, 2015
Application for Transfer Denied December 22, 2015
Jean Ann Maneke, 420 Nichols Rd., Suite 200, Kansas City, MO. 64112, for appellant.
Travis Allen Elliott, 901 St. Louis Street, Suite 600, Springfield, MO. .65806, for respondent.
Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J. and Angela T. Quigless, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
This is a case involving a request for records by Appellant, Roger Hurlbert ("Hurlbert") pursuant to the "Missouri Sunshine Law" (§§ 610.010 et seq., RSMo). Hurlbert appeals the circuit court's dismissal of his petition for permanent injunc-tive relief against Wendy Norwald, the custodian of records for the Warren County Assessor's Office ("Assessor"), and the denial of his motion for leave to file amended petition.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
; Hurlbert filed suit individually, and doing business as Sage, Information Systems.