Case Name: In the Matter of the Suspension of the Driving Privileges of: McEUEN, Respondent, v. MOTOR VEHICLES DIVISION, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1985-09-18
Citations: 75 Or. App. 334
Docket Number: 84-1984-E; CA A35227
Parties: In the Matter of the Suspension of the Driving Privileges of: McEUEN, Respondent, v. MOTOR VEHICLES DIVISION, Appellant.
Judges: Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Van Hoomissen and Young, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 75
Pages: 334–335

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted June 19,
reversed and remanded with instructions September 18,
reconsideration denied November 1, petition for review denied December 10, 1985 (300 Or 367)
In the Matter of the Suspension of the Driving Privileges of: McEUEN, Respondent, v. MOTOR VEHICLES DIVISION, Appellant.
(84-1984-E; CA A35227)
706 P2d 184
Robert M. Atkinson, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and James E. Mountain, Jr., Solicitor General, Salem.
Michael L. Mowrey, Grants Pass, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were R. Daniel Simcoe, and Burrows, Simcoe & Mowrey, Grants Pass.
Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Van Hoomissen and Young, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
The Motor Vehicles Division appeals from the order of the circuit court that reversed its administrative suspension of petitioner's driving privileges for refusal to take a breath test. The trial court held that the suspension was invalid, because petitioner was not informed he had a right to an independent test if his blood alcohol level was less than .08 percent. We reverse and reinstate Division's order of suspension. Wimmer v. Motor Vehicles Division, 75 Or App 287, 706 P2d 182 (1985).