Case Name: The State, ex rel. Harris Graphics Corporation, Appellee, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1988-12-30
Citations: 40 Ohio St. 3d 419
Docket Number: No. 88-1794
Parties: The State, ex rel. Harris Graphics Corporation, Appellee, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellant.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Locher, Holmes, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 40
Pages: 419–420

Head Matter:
The State, ex rel. Harris Graphics Corporation, Appellee, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellant.
[Cite as State, ex rel. Harris Graphics Corp., v. Indus. Comm. (1988), 40 Ohio St. 3d 419.]
(No. 88-1794
Submitted December 28, 1988
Decided December 30, 1988. )
Seeley, Savidge & Aussem and Thomas M. Carolin, for appellee.
Anthony J. Celebrezze, Jr., attorney general, Jenice R. Golson, Michael L. Squillace and Merl H. Wayman, for appellant.
Bruce R. Rose, for Zivota Pantic.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Per our decision in State, ex rel. Eaton Corp., v. Lancaster (1988), 40 Ohio St. 3d 404, 534 N.E. 2d 46, with which this cause was consolidated on November 23, 1988, we find that the commission abused its discretion in continuing temporary total disability compensation despite its own finding that the respondent's condition had become permanent. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed. The commission is ordered to hold further proceedings consistent with State, ex rel. Eaton Corp.
Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., Locher, Holmes, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.
Sweeney and Douglas, JJ., concur separately.