Case Name: Orlando Minetto et al., Respondents, v. George Maragliano, Appellant, et al., Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1985-04-29
Citations: 110 A.D.2d 890
Docket Number: 
Parties: Orlando Minetto et al., Respondents, v George Maragliano, Appellant, et al., Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 110
Pages: 890–890

Head Matter:
Orlando Minetto et al., Respondents, v George Maragliano, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Opinion:
Under the circumstances, it was a proper exercise of discretion for Special Term to conclude that the delay in service of the reply to the counterclaim was excusable and that the reply was meritorious (see, CPLR 2005; Sanders & Assoc. v Hague Dev. Corp., 100 AD2d 964). Mollen, P. J., Titone, Thompson and Lawrence, JJ., concur.