Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Timothy Minnerly, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2015-04-01
Citations: 127 A.D.3d 788
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Timothy Minnerly, Appellant.
Judges: Eng, P.J., Mastro, Hall, Miller and LaSalle, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 127
Pages: 788–788

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Timothy Minnerly, Appellant.
[4 NYS3d 538]—

Opinion:
Appeals by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from two sentences of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ferdinand, J.), both imposed October 24, 2012, on the ground that the sentences were excessive.
Ordered that the sentences are affirmed.
The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Maracle, 19 NY3d 925 [2012]; People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claims. However, contrary to the defendant's contention, the sentences imposed were not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).
Eng, P.J., Mastro, Hall, Miller and LaSalle, JJ., concur.