Case Name: David DEHART, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-01-17
Citations: 363 S.W.3d 133
Docket Number: No. ED 96682
Parties: David DEHART, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 363
Pages: 133–134

Head Matter:
David DEHART, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 96682.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District.
Jan. 17, 2012.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 1, 2012.
Application for Transfer Denied May 1, 2012.
Lisa M. Stroup, St. Louis, MO, for Mov-ani/Appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, Dora A. Fichter, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent/Respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
David Dehart (Appellant) appeals from the motion court's order and judgment denying his Motion to Reopen his post- conviction proceedings. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court's denial of Appellant's Motion to Reopen was not clearly erroneous. Gehrke v. State, 280 S.W.3d 54, 56 (Mo. banc 2009). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).