Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ricardo RAMIREZ-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-04-16
Citations: 518 F. App'x 324
Docket Number: No. 12-10725
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ricardo RAMIREZ-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 518
Pages: 324–324

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ricardo RAMIREZ-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-10725
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 16, 2013.
James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Jerry Van Beard, Esq., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Dallas, TX, Helen Miller Liggett, Esq., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Lubbock, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Ricardo RamireznRodriguez raises arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Newson, 515 F.3d 374, 377-78 (5th Cir.2008), which held that the Government may decline to move for an additional one-point reduction under United States Sentencing Guidelines § 3El.l(b) based on the defendant's refusal to waive his right to appeal. The Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, its alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.