Case Name: In the Matter of Roberta KIMMEL, Debtor, William B. Rooz, Appellant, v. Roberta Kimmel, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-11-25
Citations: 302 F. App'x 518
Docket Number: No. 08-60004
Parties: In the Matter of Roberta KIMMEL, Debtor, William B. Rooz, Appellant, v. Roberta Kimmel, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 302
Pages: 518–518

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Roberta KIMMEL, Debtor, William B. Rooz, Appellant, v. Roberta Kimmel, Appellee.
No. 08-60004.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Oct. 23, 2008.
Filed Nov. 25, 2008.
Maxwell Phoenix Keith, San Francisco, CA, for Appellant.
John G. Warner, Esquire, Corte Madera, CA, for Appellee.
Before: BRUNETTI, ARCHER, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
The Honorable Glenn L. Archer, Jr., United States Circuit Judge for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
William B. Rooz ("Rooz") appeals the judgment of the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel ("BAP") affirming the bankruptcy court's dismissal of Rooz's complaint following the grant of Roberta Kimmel's Rule 12(c) motion for judgment on the pleadings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158, and we affirm.
The Bankruptcy Panel, affirming the bankruptcy court, ruled that Rooz's claim under California's Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act was barred by the discharge injunction of 11 U.S.C. § 524(a)(3). We affirm for the reasons stated in the BAP's opinion filed November 8, 2007.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.