Case Name: Vicki A. FLANIGAN, Respondent, v. David W. FLANIGAN, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2011-11-15
Citations: 356 S.W.3d 339
Docket Number: No. ED 95283
Parties: Vicki A. FLANIGAN, Respondent, v. David W. FLANIGAN, Appellant.
Judges: Before: CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 356
Pages: 339–339

Head Matter:
Vicki A. FLANIGAN, Respondent, v. David W. FLANIGAN, Appellant.
No. ED 95283.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Nov. 15, 2011.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Dec. 22, 2011.
Application for Transfer Denied Jan. 31, 2012.
Lawrence G. Gillespie, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Byron Cohen, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before: CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
David W. Flanigan appeals from the trial court's judgment dissolving his marriage to Vicki A. Flanigan (Wife). He challenges the trial court's order awarding to Wife $2,000 per month for modifiable maintenance. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion in determining the amount of the maintenance award. Atchley v. Atchley, 334 S.W.3d 709, 712 (Mo.App. E.D.2011). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2011).