Case Name: HAYNER v. BURNS et ux
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1962-04-04
Citations: 230 Or. 379
Docket Number: 
Parties: HAYNER v. BURNS et ux
Judges: Before McAllister, Chief Justice, and Warner, Sloan and O’Connell, Justices.
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 230
Pages: 379–380

Head Matter:
Argued March 5,
affirmed April 4, 1962
HAYNER v. BURNS et ux
370 P. 2d 235
Bruce J. Manley, Medford, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was John M. Ross, Medford.
Ervin B. Hogan, Medford, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Frohnmayer, Lowry, Hogan & Deatherage, Medford.
Before McAllister, Chief Justice, and Warner, Sloan and O’Connell, Justices.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In his abstract and brief plaintiff states that this is a proceeding in equity for the dissolution of a partnership and an accounting. It was claimed that plaintiff and defendant Robert Burns formed a partnership to exploit some mining claims in Colorado.
At the conclusion of the trial and later by a written opinion, the trial court found a complete lack of any evidence sustaining plaintiff's claim. We agree with the court. The record is devoid of any evidence to establish a claim of right of any kind in favor of plaintiff against defendants. The facts are of interest only to the parties. They do not justify statement here.
Decree affirmed.