Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Luis LOPEZ-VILLALOBOS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-08-16
Citations: 104 F. App'x 691
Docket Number: No. 03-50508; D.C. No. CR-03-00362-PA
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jose Luis LOPEZ-VILLALOBOS, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, RAWLINSON and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 104
Pages: 691–692

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jose Luis LOPEZ-VILLALOBOS, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 03-50508.
D.C. No. CR-03-00362-PA.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 9, 2004.
Decided Aug. 16, 2004.
Ronald L. Cheng, Christopher D. Johnson, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Ange-les, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Kathryn A. Young, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for De-fendanfi-Appellant.
Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, RAWLINSON and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Jose Luis Lopez-Villalobos appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 57-month sentence for being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Lopez-Villalobos has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Lopez-Villalobos has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.