Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Appellant, v. WILLIAM THOMAS EHRLE, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1985-07-10
Citations: 74 Or. App. 358
Docket Number: 84-601-C, 84-658-C; CA A32673
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Appellant, v. WILLIAM THOMAS EHRLE, Respondent.
Judges: Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Van Hoomissen and Young, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 74
Pages: 358–359

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted December 20, 1984,
affirmed July 10, 1985
STATE OF OREGON, Appellant, v. WILLIAM THOMAS EHRLE, Respondent.
(84-601-C, 84-658-C; CA A32673)
701 P2d 1056
Brenda J. Peterson, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and James E. Mountain, Jr., Solicitor General, Salem.
David E. Groom, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.
Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Van Hoomissen and Young, Judges.
PER CURIAM
Van Hoomissen, J., dissenting.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
The state appeals a trial court order that sustained defendant's demurrer to two indictments for multiple counts of robbery in the first degree, ORS 164.415, on the ground that the indictments show on their face that the Statute of Limitations, ORS 131.125(2) (a), had run. The trial court was correct. See State v. Livingston, 73 Or App 551, 699 P2d 1131 (1985).
Affirmed.