Case Name: Calvin Phalon WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1999-05-19
Citations: 731 So. 2d 865
Docket Number: No. 98-2849
Parties: Calvin Phalon WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before GODERICH, FLETCHER and SORONDO, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 731
Pages: 865–865

Head Matter:
Calvin Phalon WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 98-2849.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 19, 1999.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Robert Godfrey and Beth C. Weitzner, Assistant Public Defenders, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Terri León-Benner, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before GODERICH, FLETCHER and SORONDO, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by revoking the defendant's probation. However, as the State properly concedes, the order of revocation must be vacated, and the cause remanded with directions for entry of a written order of revocation that conforms to the trial court's oral pronouncements. Fairman v. State, 576 So.2d 948, 950 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).
Affirmed, in part; reversed, in part, and remanded with directions.
. At the revocation of probation hearing, the trial court specifically stated that although the defendant had been arrested, it was not finding a violation of the condition that requires the defendant to live at liberty without violating any law. In contrast, the written order of revocation reflects that the defendant violated this condition.