Case Name: ARLEN PORTER SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF OREGON, acting by and through the Department of Corrections and the Oregon State Police, Defendant-Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2009-11-04
Citations: 231 Or. App. 661
Docket Number: 02C12218; A141457
Parties: ARLEN PORTER SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF OREGON, acting by and through the Department of Corrections and the Oregon State Police, Defendant-Respondent.
Judges: Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Armstrong, Judge, and Rosenblum, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 231
Pages: 661–662

Head Matter:
Submitted October 2,
reversed November 4, 2009
ARLEN PORTER SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF OREGON, acting by and through the Department of Corrections and the Oregon State Police, Defendant-Respondent.
Marion County Circuit Court
02C12218; A141457
220 P3d 444
Arlen Porter Smith filed the briefs pro se.
John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Jerome Lidz, Solicitor General, and Samuel A. Kubernick, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Armstrong, Judge, and Rosenblum, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Plaintiff appeals a supplemental judgment for filing fees that previously had been deferred. On appeal, plaintiff contends that the court erred in entering the supplemental judgment without making a determination that he had the ability to pay the fees. The state concedes that the trial court erred in that regard. We agree and accept that concession. See State ex rel Baker v. Cook, 171 Or App 719, 16 P3d 1184 (2000) (citing former ORS 21.605(1)(a) (1999), repealed by Or Laws 2007, ch 493, § 18, 18a; holding that the trial court erred in imposing an obligation to pay previously deferred filing fees).
Reversed.