Case Name: Peter Daniel SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1981-03-04
Citations: 395 So. 2d 575
Docket Number: No. 80-425
Parties: Peter Daniel SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: DAUKSCH, C. J., and COBB, J., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 395
Pages: 575–576

Head Matter:
Peter Daniel SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 80-425.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
March 4, 1981.
Rehearing Denied March 26, 1981.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Brynn Newton, Asst. Public Defender, Day-tona Beach, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Edward M. Chew, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dayto-na Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
COWART, Judge.
Appellant appeals from a verdict of guilty and from the sentence imposed claiming that the trial court erred in denying his motions for judgments of acquittal made during trial because the evidence was insufficient to establish a prima facie case of the crime charged and that the trial court erred in sustaining the state's objection to a statement appellant's trial counsel made in closing argument.
A verdict is not appealable. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(b)(1) and § 924.06(1), Fla.Stat. (1979). The points raised on ap peal relate to the final judgment adjudicating guilt, which was not appealed, but not to the legality of the sentence. As to the verdict this appeal is dismissed. The sentence is
AFFIRMED.
DAUKSCH, C. J., and COBB, J., concur.