Case Name: Violet GOODWIN, Appellant, v. CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-12-20
Citations: 444 F. App'x 926
Docket Number: No. 11-2657
Parties: Violet GOODWIN, Appellant, v. CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY, Appellee.
Judges: Before MURPHY, ARNOLD, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 444
Pages: 926–926

Head Matter:
Violet GOODWIN, Appellant, v. CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY, Appellee.
No. 11-2657.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 15, 2011.
Filed: Dec. 20, 2011.
Violet Goodwin, Omaha, NE, pro se.
Abigail M. Moland, McGrath & North, Omaha, NE, for Appellee.
Before MURPHY, ARNOLD, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Violet Goodwin appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment in her Title VI discrimination action, in which she alleged that the defendant University had discriminated against her in its law school admissions process. Upon careful de novo review, this court concludes the judgment of the district court was correct for the reasons stated in the district court's order. See Tusing v. Des Moines Indep. Cmty. Sch. Dist., 639 F.3d 507, 514 (8th Cir.2011) (standard of review). See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.