Case Name: Cornelius W. McDaniel v. Mary A. Mattingly
Court: Supreme Court of Indiana
Jurisdiction: Indiana
Decision Date: 1881-03-29
Citations: 1 Ind. L. Rep. 129
Docket Number: 
Parties: Cornelius W. McDaniel v. Mary A. Mattingly.
Judges: 
Reporter: Indiana Law Reporter
Volume: 1
Pages: 129–130

Head Matter:
Cornelius W. McDaniel v. Mary A. Mattingly.
Bill of Exceptions—Affidavits.—Affidavits must be made a part of the record by a bill of exceptions.
Filed March 29, 1881.
Appeal from Daviess.
O’Neall & Hefron, for appellants,
cited Graham & W. on New Trials, 1048; Humphreys v. Klick, 49 Ind. 190; Bains v. Ballou, 57 Ind. 79, as to admissions of party in regard to cumulative evidence.
W. R. Gardiner and S. H. Taylor, for appellee.

Opinion:
Opinion of the court by
Mr. Justice Woods.
The affidavits on which the appellant claims a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence are not made a part of the record by a bill of exceptions. Counsel claim no other error. The judgment must, therefore, be affirmed.
Williams v. Potter, (at this term); Matlock v. Todd, 19 Ind. 130; Horton v. Wilson, 25 Ind. 316; Burnett v. Overton, 67 Ind. 557; Fryherger v. Perkins, 66 Ind. 19; Burlin v. Oglesbee etal., 65 Ind. 308; Buskirk's Practice, 241.
Judgment affirmed with costs.