Case Name: Patrick A. JONES, Petitioner-Appellant v. John B. FOX, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-12-12
Citations: 453 F. App'x 471
Docket Number: No. 11-40215
Parties: Patrick A. JONES, Petitioner-Appellant v. John B. FOX, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before JONES, Chief Judge, and HAYNES and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 453
Pages: 471–471

Head Matter:
Patrick A. JONES, Petitioner-Appellant v. John B. FOX, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 11-40215
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 12, 2011.
Patrick Alexander Jones, USP McCreary, Pine Knot, KY, pro se.
Before JONES, Chief Judge, and HAYNES and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Patrick A. Jones, federal prisoner # 60763-080, was convicted of three charges related to crack cocaine and was sentenced to serve life in prison. He appeals the district court's denial of the 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition he filed to challenge the collection of the $3000 fine and $300 special assessment he was ordered to pay in connection with his convictions. We review the district court's factual findings for clear error and issues of law de novo. See Jeffers v. Chandler, 253 F.3d 827, 830 (5th Cir.2001).
Consistent with his arguments in the district court, Jones maintains that the setting of a payment schedule for his fine and assessment by the BOP amounted to an unconstitutional delegation of the sentencing court's authority. The sentencing court ordered him to pay a certain sum as a fine and provided that this sum was to be paid immediately. See 18 U.S.C. 3572(d). Consequently, there was no unconstitutional delegation of judicial authority. Jones's contention that the penalties imposed upon him pursuant to the Inmate Financial Responsibility Program have constitutional significance likewise fails, as none of these punishments "imposes atypical and significant hardship on [him] in relation to the ordinary incidents of prison life." Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 483-84, 115 S.Ct. 2293, 132 L.Ed.2d 418 (1995) (citations omitted).
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.