Case Name: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Robert James FLARIDA, aka Fred Stone; et al., Defendant- Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-08-29
Citations: 142 F. App'x 976
Docket Number: No. 02-50065
Parties: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Robert James FLARIDA, aka Fred Stone; et al., Defendant— Appellant.
Judges: Before: PREGERSON, BEEZER, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 142
Pages: 976–976

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Robert James FLARIDA, aka Fred Stone; et al., Defendant— Appellant.
No. 02-50065.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Aug. 29, 2005.
Elana Shavit Artson, Esq., USLA — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Eric T. Smith, Esq., Orange, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: PREGERSON, BEEZER, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
In our unpublished disposition, we affirmed Flarida's conviction for mail fraud, wire fraud, and money laundering. United States v. Flarida, 97 Fed. Appx. 794 (9th Cir.2004). The Supreme Court vacated the disposition and remanded to this court for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Flarida v. United States, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 1051, 160 L.Ed.2d 997 (2005). We remand to the district court for further proceedings in light of United States v. Booker, — U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005) and United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). In all other respects, our prior decision remains in full force and effect.