Case Name: In Re: Jimmie Craig DANIELS, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-12-03
Citations: 403 F. App'x 831
Docket Number: No. 10-1459
Parties: In Re: Jimmie Craig DANIELS, Petitioner.
Judges: Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 403
Pages: 831–831

Head Matter:
In Re: Jimmie Craig DANIELS, Petitioner.
No. 10-1459.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 18, 2010.
Decided: Dec. 3, 2010.
Jimmie Craig Daniels, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jimmie Craig Daniels petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2010) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court's docket reveals that the district court has denied Daniels' § 2255 motion. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Daniels' case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny Daniels' motion for release. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.