Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. Michael Arthur FLANAGAN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-02-27
Citations: 56 F. App'x 435
Docket Number: No. 01-50504; D.C. No. CR-00-124-DOC
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiffs — Appellees, v. Michael Arthur FLANAGAN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 56
Pages: 435–436

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiffs — Appellees, v. Michael Arthur FLANAGAN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 01-50504.
D.C. No. CR-00-124-DOC.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Feb. 10, 2003.
Decided Feb. 27, 2003.
Before B. FLETCHER and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges, and BURY, District Judge.
The Honorable David C. Bury, District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Michael Arthur Flanagan appeals his jury convictions for,armed bank robbery and using a firearm during a crime of violence, arguing that the district court improperly admitted statements he made following his arrest. These statements were in response to booking questions not reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response. See United States v. Booth, 669 F.2d 1231, 1237 (9th Cir. 1981); see also Rhode Island v. Innis, 446 U.S. 291, 301, 100 S.Ct. 1682, 1689, 64 L.Ed.2d 297 (1980). Moreover, any error by the dis trict court was harmless in light of the substantial, independent, and credible evidence of guilt. United States v. Polanco, 98 F.3d 555, 562 (9th Cir.1996).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or used by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.