Case Name: Ronald G. BAILEY-EL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. B.G. COMPTON; Federal Bureau of Prisons, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-12-15
Citations: 115 F. App'x 644
Docket Number: No. 04-7260
Parties: Ronald G. BAILEY-EL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. B.G. COMPTON; Federal Bureau of Prisons, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 115
Pages: 644–645

Head Matter:
Ronald G. BAILEY-EL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. B.G. COMPTON; Federal Bureau of Prisons, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 04-7260.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 9, 2004.
Decided Dec. 15, 2004.
Ronald G. Bailey-El, Appellant pro se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Ronald G. Bailey-El, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bailey-El v. Compton, No. CA-03-806-7-SGW (W.D.Va. filed June 17, 2004 & entered June 18, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED