Case Name: Carl A. WARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-09-15
Citations: 976 S.W.2d 599
Docket Number: No. 73652
Parties: Carl A. WARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before PUDLOWSKI, P.J., and CRANDALL and AHRENS, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 976
Pages: 599–599

Head Matter:
Carl A. WARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 73652.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Sept. 15, 1998.
Ellen H. Flottman, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before PUDLOWSKI, P.J., and CRANDALL and AHRENS, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Carl A. Ward, appeals from the denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Ward was charged by indictment with first degree robbery, Section 569.020, RSMo 1994. A jury found Ward guilty of robbery and he was sentenced to a term of fifteen years. This court affirmed the conviction. State v. Ward, 943 S.W.2d 792 (Mo.App. 1997). Ward filed an amended Rule 29.15 motion for postrconviction relief that the motion court denied. He appeals from the denial of his 29.15 motion. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).