Case Name: Marianne FENZL, Respondent, v. James GERHARDT, et al., Appellants, v. MAGNA BANK, f/k/a Landmark Bank of St. Charles, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-01-10
Citations: 892 S.W.2d 767
Docket Number: No. 63774
Parties: Marianne FENZL, Respondent, v. James GERHARDT, et al., Appellants, v. MAGNA BANK, f/k/a Landmark Bank of St. Charles, Respondent.
Judges: Before AHRENS, P.J., and KAROHL and CRANE, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 892
Pages: 767–767

Head Matter:
Marianne FENZL, Respondent, v. James GERHARDT, et al., Appellants, v. MAGNA BANK, f/k/a Landmark Bank of St. Charles, Respondent.
No. 63774.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Jan. 10, 1995.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Feb. 22, 1995.
William James O’Herin, Florissant, for appellant.
Brian E. McGovern, McCarthy, Leonard, Kaemmerer, Owen, Laderman & Lamkin, Chesterfield, for respondent.
Before AHRENS, P.J., and KAROHL and CRANE, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
In this court-tried case, defendants appeal from judgments in favor of plaintiff in consolidated suits on a promissory note and for damages for fraud and misrepresentation.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).