Case Name: Alicia WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STEAK 'N SHAKE, INC., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-12-04
Citations: 623 F. App'x 307
Docket Number: No. 15-5522
Parties: Alicia WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STEAK ‘N SHAKE, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before: GRIFFIN and KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judges; CLELAND, District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 623
Pages: 307–308

Head Matter:
Alicia WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STEAK ‘N SHAKE, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 15-5522.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Dec. 4, 2015.
Before: GRIFFIN and KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judges; CLELAND, District Judge.
The Honorable Robert H. Cleland, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal in which the appellant does not purport to identify any error by the district court. Alicia Williams worked for Steak 'N Shake for almost seven years. Eventually they fired her. She brought this lawsuit pro se, asserting claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12112, and state law. The district court granted summary judgment to Steak 'N Shake on all of Williams's claims because she had no evidence to support them. Now represented by counsel on appeal, Williams does not identify any specific error by the district court or even describe the actual proceedings below. Instead her brief to this court is a meditation upon the putative injuries that court rules and procedures inflict upon pro se litigants. Williams therefore provides us with no lawful basis upon which to grant her relief.
The district court's judgment is affirmed.