Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lashonda R. GREEN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-08-20
Citations: 108 F. App'x 447
Docket Number: No. 03-10508
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lashonda R. GREEN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: PREGERSON and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges, and RHOADES, District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 108
Pages: 447–448

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lashonda R. GREEN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 03-10508.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Aug. 12, 2004.
Decided Aug. 20, 2004.
Wes R. Porter, Esq., Jimmy Chen, Matthew J. Rinka, Esq., United States Attor neys Office, Honolulu, HI, for PlaintiffAppellee.
William Mallory Kent, Esq., Jacksonville, FL, for Defendani>-Appellant.
Before: PREGERSON and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges, and RHOADES, District Judge.
The Honorable John S. Rhoades, Sr., Senior Judge, United States District Cotut for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
The government did not breach its plea agreement with defendant. See United States v. Benchimol, 471 U.S. 453, 455, 105 S.Ct. 2103, 85 L.Ed.2d 462 (1985) (per curiam). Defendant waived the right to appeal her sentence, and we therefore dismiss her appeal. Because defendant's waiver also precludes us from considering her argument based on Blakely v. Washington, — U.S.-, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), we deny her motion for supplemental briefing.
APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.