Case Name: REITZER et al. v. MEDINA VALLEY IRR. CO.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1916-12-15
Citations: 237 F. 1020
Docket Number: No. 2980
Parties: REITZER et al. v. MEDINA VALLEY IRR. CO.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter
Volume: 237
Pages: 1020–1020

Head Matter:
REITZER et al. v. MEDINA VALLEY IRR. CO.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
December 15, 1916.
Rehearing Denied January 9, 1917.)
No. 2980.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Texas; Wm. B. Sheppard, Judge.
C. L. Bass, of San Antonio, Tex. (T. T. Vander Hoeven, of San Antonio, Tex., on the brief), for plaintiffs in efcror. Wm. Aubrey, of San Antonio, Tex. (West & McMillan, of San Antonio, Tex., on the brief), for defendant in error.
Before PARDEE and WALKER, Circuit Judges, and FOSTER, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By uncontradieted evidence, admitted on the trial without objection, it was shown that the defendants had estopped themselves to deny the right of the plaintiff to acquire the land in question by condemnation. This fact renders unavailable many of the assignments of error which have been insisted 'on in argument. Our examination of the record in the light of the arguments and briefs has led us to the conclusion that it does not show that any reversible error was committed. The judgment is affirmed.