Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pascual GARNICA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-12-02
Citations: 404 F. App'x 359
Docket Number: No. 10-10578
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pascual GARNICA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before BARKETT, MARCUS and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 404
Pages: 359–359

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pascual GARNICA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-10578
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Dec. 2, 2010.
Stacie B. Harris, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Judy K. Hunt, A. Brian Albritton, Sijmon Alexander Gaugush, David Paul Rhodes, United States Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Daniel Lawrence Castillo, Law Office of Daniel L. Castillo, Tampa, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Pascual Garnica, Coleman, FL, pro se.
Before BARKETT, MARCUS and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Daniel L. Castillo, appointed counsel for Pascual Garnica in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Garnica's conviction and sentence under Count One are AFFIRMED.