Case Name: Igor Benfeld et al., Plaintiffs, v. Fleming Properties, LLC, Defendant, and Bay Homes Realty, Inc., et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents. Rostislav Galkin et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2007-03-27
Citations: 38 A.D.3d 814
Docket Number: 
Parties: Igor Benfeld et al., Plaintiffs, v Fleming Properties, LLC, Defendant, and Bay Homes Realty, Inc., et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents. Rostislav Galkin et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 38
Pages: 814–815

Head Matter:
Igor Benfeld et al., Plaintiffs, v Fleming Properties, LLC, Defendant, and Bay Homes Realty, Inc., et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents. Rostislav Galkin et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellants.
[831 NYS2d 338]

Opinion:
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of warranty, the third-party defendants, Rostislav Galkin and Dinara Galkina, appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (McMahon, J.), dated May 2, 2006, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint, with leave to renew after the completion of discovery.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the motion for summary judgment with leave to renew after the completion of discovery (see CPLR 3211 [d]; 3212 [f]). Mastro, J.P, Florio, Garni and McCarthy, JJ., concur.