Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hector Saul ESTRADA-RAMOS, a.k.a. Hector Estrada-Ramos, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-04-18
Citations: 687 F. App'x 583
Docket Number: No. 16-10238
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hector Saul ESTRADA-RAMOS, a.k.a. Hector Estrada-Ramos, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 687
Pages: 583–583

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hector Saul ESTRADA-RAMOS, a.k.a. Hector Estrada-Ramos, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-10238
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 11, 2017
Filed April 18, 2017
Erica McCallum, Assistant U.S. Attorney, USTU—Office of the US Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Hector Saul Estrada-Ramos, Pro Se
Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Hector Saul Estrada-Ramos appeals from the district court's judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 37-month sentence for attempted reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Estrada-Ramos's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Estrada-Ramos the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Estrada-Ramos waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss the appeal. See id. at 988.
We remand the case to the district court with instructions to correct the judgment to reflect the correct offense of conviction, attempted reentry of a removed alien.
Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED; REMANDED to correct the judgment.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.