Case Name: MRS. ELOISE B. MULLEN v. E. D. GREEN REALTY CO. (K. S. BIGGERS, Intervener and Third Opponent)
Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1932-05-04
Citations: 19 La. App. 641
Docket Number: No. 4315
Parties: MRS. ELOISE B. MULLEN v. E. D. GREEN REALTY CO. (K. S. BIGGERS, Intervener and Third Opponent)
Judges: 
Reporter: Louisiana Court of Appeals Reports
Volume: 19
Pages: 641–642

Head Matter:
No. 4315
Second Circuit (Second Division)
MRS. ELOISE B. MULLEN v. E. D. GREEN REALTY CO. (K. S. BIGGERS, Intervener and Third Opponent)
(May 4, 1932. Opinion and Decree.)
■ Dimick & Hamilton, of Shreveport, attorneys for plaintiff, appellee.
Foster, Hall, Barret & Smith, of Shreveport, attorneys for intervener and third opponent, appellant.

Opinion:
STEPHENS, J.
The plaintiff obtained a judgment against the defendant and caused to be issued a writ of fieri facias on October 14, 1931, and to be seized thereunder a promissory mortgage note in the sum of $475, executed by Mary Waterman Evans, to the order of herself and by her endorsed in blank.
The note was seized while in the possession of Texas Lumber Company, Incorporated, as the property of defendant, B. D. Green Realty Company, Incorporated.
After the seizure, K. S. Biggers filed an intervention and third opposition, claiming to be the owner of the note by assignment from the defendant, E. D. Green Realty Company,. Incorporated, the pledgor, subject to the rights of the pledgee, the Texas Lumber Company, Incorporated; the assignment of the rights and interests of the former owner and pledgor, the defendant, E. D. Green Realty Company, .Incorporated, having been notified to the Texas Lumber Company, Incorporated, the pledgee, prior to the date of seizure.
Plaintiff filed an exception of no cause or right of action to the intervention and third opposition, which was sustained by the trial court. The intervener appealed from that judgment.
By consent of counsel, the judgment sustaining the exception of no cause of action is reversed and annulled, and the case is ordered remanded to the trial court for further proceeding according to law.