Case Name: Balthazar Dornbach et al., Resp'ts, v. John Hahn, App'lt
Court: Brooklyn City Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1893-10-23
Citations: 56 N.Y. St. Rep. 904
Docket Number: 
Parties: Balthazar Dornbach et al., Resp’ts, v. John Hahn, App’lt.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 56
Pages: 904–904

Head Matter:
Filed October 23, 1893.
Balthazar Dornbach et al., Resp’ts, v. John Hahn, App’lt.
August P. Wagener, app’lt; Frank Obernier, for resp’ts.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The appellant has not, by oral argument or printed points, called our attention to any exception or ground upon which he claims that this judgment should be reversed. He has simply submitted the appeal book. Our examination of the case discloses no reason for a reversal. Judgment must be affirmed, with costs.