Case Name: Oscar Lee TAYLOR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patricia R. STANSBERRY; Harley Lappin; P. Guanja, Regional Director; A. Gonzales, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-09-13
Citations: 200 F. App'x 177
Docket Number: No. 06-6325
Parties: Oscar Lee TAYLOR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patricia R. STANSBERRY; Harley Lappin; P. Guanja, Regional Director; A. Gonzales, Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 200
Pages: 177–177

Head Matter:
Oscar Lee TAYLOR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patricia R. STANSBERRY; Harley Lappin; P. Guanja, Regional Director; A. Gonzales, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 06-6325.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 31, 2006.
Decided: Sept. 13, 2006.
Oscar Lee Taylor, Appellant Pro Se.
Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Oscar Lee Taylor, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Taylor v. Stansberry, No. 5:06-hc-00023-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 3, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.