Case Name: Phillip Dyland HOLLAND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1986-01-15
Citations: 484 So. 2d 596
Docket Number: No. 85-2583
Parties: Phillip Dyland HOLLAND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: LETTS, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 484
Pages: 596–596

Head Matter:
Phillip Dyland HOLLAND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 85-2583.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jan. 15, 1986.
Rehearing Denied March 6, 1986.
Phillip Dyland Holland, pro se.
No appearance for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Mr. Holland's motion for post-conviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 was denied without an evidentia-ry hearing. Holland appeals, contending that he was entitled to a hearing under authority of Morgan v. State, 475 So.2d 681 (Fla.1985). Facially, Holland is correct. However our review leaves us convinced that the error was harmless according to applicable criteria and that no purpose would be served by remanding for a hearing. Palmes v. State, 397 So.2d 648 (Fla.1981) and Recinos v. State, 420 So.2d 95 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). See also Section 924.-33, Florida Statutes (1984).
Affirmed.
LETTS, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.