Case Name: Medley, Appellant, v. J.H. Williams Industrial Products, Inc. et al., Appellees
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1990-03-07
Citations: 49 Ohio St. 3d 606
Docket Number: No. 88-1937
Parties: Medley, Appellant, v. J.H. Williams Industrial Products, Inc. et al., Appellees.
Judges: Sweeney, Douglas, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 49
Pages: 606–606

Head Matter:
Medley, Appellant, v. J.H. Williams Industrial Products, Inc. et al., Appellees.
[Cite as Medley v. J.H. Williams Indus. Prod., Inc. (1990), 49 Ohio St. 3d 606.]
(No. 88-1937
Submitted January 9, 1990
Decided March 7, 1990.)
Powers & Sobieski, Ralph P. Sobieski and DonaldH. Powers, for appellant.
Kirkland & Ellis, Richard C. Godfrey, Chaim T. Kijfel, Sheila W. Elston, Ulmer & Berne and Marvin L. Karp, for appellees Williams, Polaris, Doede, Dines and Hansmann.
Arthur Young & Company, Patricia A. McGovern, Thompson, Hiñe & Flory, Mark Kennedy and Barry L. Lubow, for appellees Arthur Young, Poison and Keider.

Opinion:
This appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.
Sweeney, Douglas, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Moyer, C.J., Holmes and Wright, JJ., dissent.
Holmes, J., dissenting. I would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.
Moyer, C.J., and Wright, J., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.