Case Name: MORRISS-BUICK COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. H. H. HUSS, Defendant in Error
Court: Texas Commission of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1938-02-23
Citations: 113 S.W.2d 891
Docket Number: No. 1720—6998
Parties: MORRISS-BUICK COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. H. H. HUSS, Defendant in Error.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 113
Pages: 891–891

Head Matter:
MORRISS-BUICK COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. H. H. HUSS, Defendant in Error.
No. 1720—6998.
Commission of Appeals of Texas, Section B.
Feb. 23, 1938.
R. T. Bailey, of Dallas, for plaintiff in error. '
Young, Blakley, Cooper -& Armstrong, Flaskell H. Cooper, Hoyet A. Armstrong, and Joe Utay, all of Dallas, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
MARTIN, Commissioner.
This is a companion case to that of Morriss-Buick Co. v. Pondrom, Tex.Com.App., 113 S.W.2d 889. The law questions, with one exception, are identical in the two cases.
Judgments of the trial court and Court of Civil Appeals are reversed and. cause remanded.
Opinion adopted by the Supreme Court.