Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Herman Lee INGRAM, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-08-21
Citations: 475 F. App'x 928
Docket Number: No. 12-6840
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Herman Lee INGRAM, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 475
Pages: 928–928

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Herman Lee INGRAM, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 12-6840.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 16, 2012.
Decided: Aug. 21, 2012.
Herman Lee Ingram, Appellant Pro Se. Olivia L. Norman, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Herman Lee Ingram appeals the district court's order denying his motion seeking a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error, given that Ingram is ineligible for the reduction that he seeks. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. United States v. Ingram, No. 3:05-cr-00361-HEH-1 (E.D.Va. Apr. 17, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.