Case Name: Seaford et al., Appellees, v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2005-10-26
Citations: 106 Ohio St. 3d 430
Docket Number: No. 2005-0172
Parties: Seaford et al., Appellees, v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Appellant.
Judges: Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 106
Pages: 430–430

Head Matter:
Seaford et al., Appellees, v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Appellant.
[Cite as Seaford v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co., 106 Ohio St.3d 430, 2005-Ohio-5407.]
(No. 2005-0172
— Submitted August 23, 2005
— Decided October 26, 2005.)
Brent Coon & Associates, Christopher J. Hickey, and Mary Brigid Sweeney; Kevin E. McDermott, for appellees.
Gallagher, Sharp, Fulton & Norman, Kevin C. Alexandersen, Monica A. Sansalone, and Holly M. Olarczuk-Smith, for appellant.

Opinion:
{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals on the issue raised in appellant's Proposition of Law No. IV is reversed on the authority of Hess v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co., 106 Ohio St.3d 389, 2005-Ohio-5408, 835 N.E.2d 679, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for application of Hess.
Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor and O'Donnell, JJ., concur.
Moyer, C.J., and Lanzinger, J., dissent.