Case Name: Jorge Vincente PALOMINO-AGREDA, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-12-26
Citations: 305 F. App'x 390
Docket Number: No. 05-71353
Parties: Jorge Vincente PALOMINO-AGREDA, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 305
Pages: 390–391

Head Matter:
Jorge Vincente PALOMINO-AGREDA, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 05-71353.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 17, 2008.
Filed Dec. 26, 2008.
Sara M. MeVicker, Esquire, Salgado & Associates, PLLC, Luis F. Salgado, Esquire, Washington, DC, for Petitioner.
Janet A. Bradley, Esquire, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, CAC-Distriet Counsel, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
Before: WALLACE, TROTT, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Jorge Vincente Palomino-Agreda, a native and citizen of Peru, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge's removal order. We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review the agency's discretionary denial of PalominoAgreda's application for adjustment of status. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)©; Bazua-Cota v. Gonzales, 466 F.3d 747, 748 (9th Cir.2006) (per curiam).
We also lack jurisdiction to consider Palomino-Agreda's remaining contentions because he failed to exhaust them before the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.