Case Name: Edd C. BLACKWOOD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1992-12-16
Citations: 842 S.W.2d 695
Docket Number: No. 941-91
Parties: Edd C. BLACKWOOD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 842
Pages: 695–696

Head Matter:
Edd C. BLACKWOOD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
No. 941-91.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.
Dec. 16, 1992.
Bruce R. Hardesty, Austin, for appellant.
John B. Holmes, Jr., Dist. Atty. and Kathleen Braddock, Asst. Dist. Atty., Houston, Robert Huttash, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
OPINION ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
PER CURIAM.
Appellant was surety on a bond for Ronald Lynn Nash. The trial court ordered the bond forfeited and entered a final judgment against appellant and others in the amount of $110,645. This judgment was affirmed. Nash v. State, 811 S.W.2d 698 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th] 1991).
Appellant filed a petition for discretionary review of this opinion. The petition was granted October 16, 1991, to determine the effect of Matyastik v. State, 811 S.W.2d 102 (Tex.Cr.App.1991), on the validity of Article 22.16(a), V.A.C.C.P. Appellant has now filed a motion to dismiss his petition. We grant appellant's motion.
Appellant's petition for discretionary review is dismissed.