Case Name: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Jesse James TISDALE, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1986-08-21
Citations: 492 So. 2d 1071
Docket Number: No. 67,787
Parties: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Jesse James TISDALE, Respondent.
Judges: McDonald, C.J., and BOYD, OVER-TON and BARKETT, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 492
Pages: 1071–1071

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Jesse James TISDALE, Respondent.
No. 67,787.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Aug. 21, 1986.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Kevin Kitpa-trick Carson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for petitioner.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender and Daniel J. Schafer, Asst. Public Defender, Seventh Judicial Circuit, Daytona Beach, for respondent.

Opinion:
ADKINS, Justice.
In Tisdale v. State, 475 So.2d 1331 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985), the court vacated Tisdale's sentence, finding error in the trial court's application of the guidelines in effect at the time of sentencing rather than at the time of the crime's commission. We have jurisdiction based on conflict. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.
In State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985), we found that the guidelines in effect at the time of sentencing may properly be applied to determine a defendant's sentence. See State v. Taft, 487 So.2d 1068 (Fla.1986).
We therefore quash the opinion here under review.
It is so ordered.
McDonald, C.J., and BOYD, OVER-TON and BARKETT, JJ., concur.
EHRLICH, J., concurs specially with an opinion.
SHAW, J., dissents with an opinion.