Case Name: Benjamin William FAWLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gene JOHNSON, Director, Department of Corrections; Larry Huffman, Western Regional Director; R.C. Mathena, Warden, Keen Mountain Correctional Center; Mr. D. Vass, Treatment Program Supervisor; Ms. Rife, Protective Custody Unit Counselor, Defendants-Appellees, and Other Jane and John Doe Officials and Staff, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-02-21
Citations: 466 F. App'x 187
Docket Number: No. 11-7147
Parties: Benjamin William FAWLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gene JOHNSON, Director, Department of Corrections; Larry Huffman, Western Regional Director; R.C. Mathena, Warden, Keen Mountain Correctional Center; Mr. D. Vass, Treatment Program Supervisor; Ms. Rife, Protective Custody Unit Counselor, Defendants-Appellees, and Other Jane and John Doe Officials and Staff, Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 466
Pages: 187–188

Head Matter:
Benjamin William FAWLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gene JOHNSON, Director, Department of Corrections; Larry Huffman, Western Regional Director; R.C. Mathena, Warden, Keen Mountain Correctional Center; Mr. D. Vass, Treatment Program Supervisor; Ms. Rife, Protective Custody Unit Counselor, Defendants-Appellees, and Other Jane and John Doe Officials and Staff, Defendants.
No. 11-7147.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 27, 2012.
Decided: Feb. 21, 2012.
Benjamin William Fawley, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Benjamin William Fawley appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fawley v. Johnson, No. 7:09-cv-00041-JLK, 2011 WL 3240537 (WD.Va. July 28, 2011). We deny Fawley's motion for an evidentiary hearing and deny as moot Fawley's motions seeking leave to file his informal briefs without exhibits and without serving Appellees. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.