Case Name: Kathaleen F. HALL v. Catherine F. PHILLIPS
Court: Texas Courts of Civil Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1929-10-23
Citations: 21 S.W.2d 754
Docket Number: No. 3294
Parties: Kathaleen F. HALL v. Catherine F. PHILLIPS.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 21
Pages: 754–754

Head Matter:
Kathaleen F. HALL v. Catherine F. PHILLIPS.
(No. 3294.)
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Amarillo.
Oct. 23, 1929.
Rehearing Denied Nov. 20, 1929.
Fred E. Young and Cooper & Bumpkin, all of Amarillo, and W. M. Harris, of Dallas, for plaintiff in error.
Wm. F. Nix, of Amarillo, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
HALL, C. J.
We find that this action id based upon a contract in all things identical with the contract sued upon in cause No. 3295, 21 S.W.(2d) 750, between the same parties, this day decided by us, except that different property is involved. Parties plaintiff and defendant are the same in both suits, and the propositions advanced by plaintiff in error in her brief are the same propositions urged and decided in cause No. 3295.
The property involved in this suit is described as lot 21 in block 8 in the Gables addition to the city of Amarillo.
For the reasons stated in cause No. 3295, the .judgment of the trial court in this case is affirmed.