Case Name: Donald Henry RIPLEY, James Robert Ripley, Lawrence Fitzgerald Ripley, Suzanne Ripley Kranc and John Noel Ripley, as personal representatives, etc., Appellants, v. Charles F. SIMPSON, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1980-10-17
Citations: 389 So. 2d 7
Docket Number: No. UU-54
Parties: Donald Henry RIPLEY, James Robert Ripley, Lawrence Fitzgerald Ripley, Suzanne Ripley Kranc and John Noel Ripley, as personal representatives, etc., Appellants, v. Charles F. SIMPSON, Appellee.
Judges: ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., BOOTH and SHAW, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 389
Pages: 7–7

Head Matter:
Donald Henry RIPLEY, James Robert Ripley, Lawrence Fitzgerald Ripley, Suzanne Ripley Kranc and John Noel Ripley, as personal representatives, etc., Appellants, v. Charles F. SIMPSON, Appellee.
No. UU-54.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Oct. 17, 1980.
William E. Bond, Jr., of Wells, Brown & Brady, P. A., Pensacola, for appellants.
Earl L. Lewis and Roy V. Andrews, of Lindsay & Andrews, Milton, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the trial court concerning this land dispute is based on substantial competent evidence and inferences which may justifiably be drawn from that evidence. There are conflicts in the evidence, and inferences which may have sustained a judgment for appellants, but we will not substitute our view of the evidence for that of the trial judge.
AFFIRMED.
ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., BOOTH and SHAW, JJ., concur.