Case Name: The STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Stanley STEINBRECHER, Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1981-02-03
Citations: 393 So. 2d 66
Docket Number: No. 81-83
Parties: The STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Stanley STEINBRECHER, Respondent.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 393
Pages: 66–67

Head Matter:
The STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Stanley STEINBRECHER, Respondent.
No. 81-83.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 3, 1981.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 20, 1981.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Anthony C. Musto, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.
Jack Nageley, Miami Beach, for respondent.
Before SCHWARTZ, BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Although we are unaware of any authority to support the trial judge's ruling declining to limit polygraph testimony, and we do not approve his decision, we decline to entertain the state's petition for certiora-ri because review by certiorari of pre-trial evidentiary rulings appears inappropriate. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(c).