Case Name: Jonathan BOLLS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VIRGINIA BOARD OF BAR EXAMINERS, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-02-13
Citations: 464 F. App'x 131
Docket Number: No. 11-2115
Parties: Jonathan BOLLS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VIRGINIA BOARD OF BAR EXAMINERS, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 464
Pages: 131–131

Head Matter:
Jonathan BOLLS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VIRGINIA BOARD OF BAR EXAMINERS, Defendant-Appellee.
This case was not selected for publication in the Federal Reporter
UNPUBLISHED
No. 11-2115.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 9, 2012.
Decided: Feb. 13, 2012.
Jonathan Bolls, Appellant Pro Se. Catherine Crooks Hill, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Jonathan Bolls appeals the district court's order dismissing his complaint challenging the constitutionality of the Appellee's rules governing release of a failed applicant's essay examination. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bolls v. Virginia Board of Bar Examiners, 811 F.Supp.2d 1260 (E.D.Va.2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.