Case Name: In re THOMPSON
Court: Supreme Court of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1896-08-04
Citations: 5 Cal. Unrep. 414
Docket Number: Crim. No. 170
Parties: In re THOMPSON.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Unreported Cases
Volume: 5
Pages: 414–415

Head Matter:
In re THOMPSON.
Crim. No. 170;
August 4, 1896.
45 Pac. 1034.
Attorney—Proceeding to Remove—Appeal.—An appeal by the accuser in a proceeding to remove one from his office of attorney and counselor is not contemplated by the law, and will therefore be dismissed.
APPEAL from Superior Court, Sonoma County.
Proceeding to remove It. K. Thompson from the office of attorney and counselor at law. The proceedings were dismissed on objection to the sufficiency of the accusation, and It. B. Tappan, the accuser, appeals.
Dismissed.
M. W. Simpson for appellant; H. C. Gesford for respondent.
Cited and followed in Hatter of Danford, 157 Cal. 431, 108 Pac. 325, where this point was raised along with a number of others.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Motion to dismiss appeal granted, upon the ground that an appeal by the accuser in such a proceeding is not contemplated by law.