Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wainsworth Marcellus HALL, a/k/a Unique, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-10-22
Citations: 334 F. App'x 540
Docket Number: No. 09-7257
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Wainsworth Marcellus HALL, a/k/a Unique, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 334
Pages: 540–540

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Wainsworth Marcellus HALL, a/k/a Unique, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 09-7257.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 15, 2009.
Decided: Oct. 22, 2009.
Wainsworth Marcellus Hall, Appellant Pro Se. Howard Jacob Zlotnick, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Wainsworth Marcellus Hall appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hall, No. 2:93-cr-00162-RAJ-1 (E.D. Va. June 22, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.