Case Name: Arthur M. HARRISON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1962-12-11
Citations: 311 F.2d 224
Docket Number: No. 14929
Parties: Arthur M. HARRISON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 311
Pages: 224–224

Head Matter:
Arthur M. HARRISON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 14929.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
Dec. 11, 1962.
Robert Dorrell, Toledo, Ohio (Reams, Bretherton & Neipp, Toledo, Ohio, on the brief), for appellant.
Carl V. Bruggeman, Toledo, Ohio (Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, John W. Hackett, Jr., Toledo, Ohio, on the brief), for appellee.
Before McALLISTER and WEICK, Circuit Judges, and BOYD, District Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER.
This cause came on to be heard on the briefs, argument of counsel, and the full record in the case;
And it appearing after due consideration thereof that the action of the District Judge in granting defendant-appellee's motion to dismiss the complaint of plaintiff-appellant herein for failure to state a claim upon which the relief sought could be granted constitutes no reversible error;
It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the District Court be and the same is hereby affirmed.