Case Name: Anthony STEVENSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-06-12
Citations: 46 S.W.3d 680
Docket Number: No. ED 78406
Parties: Anthony STEVENSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 46
Pages: 680–680

Head Matter:
Anthony STEVENSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 78406.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
June 12, 2001.
Ellen H. Flottman, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Evan J. Buchheim, Asst. Public Defender, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
A jury found appellant Anthony Stevenson (Movant) guilty of three counts of second degree assault of a law enforcement officer in violation of section 565.082.1, RSMo 2000 and three counts of armed criminal action in violation of section 571.015, RSMo 2000. This court affirmed Movant's direct appeal of the judgment. State v. Stevenson, 998 S.W.2d 120 (Mo.App. E.D.1999). He now appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).