Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Allan SCHULER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-09-05
Citations: 200 F. App'x 715
Docket Number: No. 05-10779
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Allan SCHULER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: CANBY, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 200
Pages: 715–716

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Allan SCHULER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-10779.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Aug. 17, 2006.
Filed Sept. 5, 2006.
Gary M. Restaino, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Jon M. Sands, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant — Appellant.
Before: CANBY, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
There was sufficient evidence, albeit circumstantial, from which a rational trier of fact could conclude that Appellant Robert Schuler knowingly possessed destructive devices in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5861(d). See United States v. Brady, 579 F.2d 1121, 1127 (9th Cir.1978) ("[C]ircumstantial evidence can be used to prove any fact, in- eluding facts from which another fact is to be inferred.").
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.