Case Name: The JAMES GROUP, INC., Respondent, v. FORM, FUNCTION, & FINESSE, INC., Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1996-02-06
Citations: 915 S.W.2d 764
Docket Number: No. 67500
Parties: The JAMES GROUP, INC., Respondent, v. FORM, FUNCTION, & FINESSE, INC., Appellant.
Judges: Before CRANE, C.J., SIMON, J., and BLACKMAR, Senior Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 915
Pages: 764–765

Head Matter:
The JAMES GROUP, INC., Respondent, v. FORM, FUNCTION, & FINESSE, INC., Appellant.
No. 67500.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Feb. 6, 1996.
David T. Hamilton, Saale, Bailey & Hamilton, L.C., St. Peters, for Appellant.
Paul W. Kopsky, Edwards J. Miller, Kop-sky & Associates, Chesterfield, for Respondent.
Before CRANE, C.J., SIMON, J., and BLACKMAR, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Form, Function & Finesse, Inc. appeals from the judgment in favor of respondent, The James Group, Inc., on its petition on account and on appellant's counterclaim for breach of contract and warranty.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find that no error of law appears. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum solely for the use of the parties involved has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.