Case Name: Tracy WILD, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2010-09-21
Citations: 320 S.W.3d 244
Docket Number: No. ED 94535
Parties: Tracy WILD, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 320
Pages: 244–245

Head Matter:
Tracy WILD, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 94535.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Sept. 21, 2010.
Ellen H. Flottman, Columbia, MO, for movant/appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, John W. Grant-ham, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent/respondent.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Tracy Wild (Appellant) appeals from the motion court's judgment dismissing with prejudice her Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 24.035 motion for postconviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court did not clearly err in dismissing Appellant's motion as untimely. Rule 24.035(b); Thomas v. State, 249 S.W.3d 234, 238 (Mo.App. E.D.2008). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).