Case Name: Phillip ADLINGTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-06-03
Citations: 599 So. 2d 1047
Docket Number: No. 92-0861
Parties: Phillip ADLINGTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: HERSEY, STONE and POLEN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 599
Pages: 1047–1047

Head Matter:
Phillip ADLINGTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 92-0861.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
June 3, 1992.
Rehearing Denied June 26, 1992.
Phillip Adlington, pro se.
No appearance for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court order denying appellant's motion to correct an illegal sentence. The motion was filed under both rule 3.800(a) and rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. However, we note that the motion was not properly filed under rule 3.850, as the oath provided only that the information was true to the best of the affiant's knowledge. See Scott v. State, 464 So.2d 1171 (Fla.1985). Therefore, in this appeal we have not considered those issues cognizable under a properly sworn 3.850 motion since the trial court could have denied relief on the improper jurat ground alone.
HERSEY, STONE and POLEN, JJ., concur.