Case Name: W. E. INGALLS v. NELS HOLMGREN
Court: Minnesota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Minnesota
Decision Date: 1900-10-25
Citations: 81 Minn. 278
Docket Number: Nos. 12,275—(177)
Parties: W. E. INGALLS v. NELS HOLMGREN.
Judges: 
Reporter: Minnesota Reports
Volume: 81
Pages: 278–279

Head Matter:
W. E. INGALLS v. NELS HOLMGREN.
October 25, 1900.
Nos. 12,275—(177).
Assignment of Error.
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Otter Tail county, Searle, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
Affirmed.
James T. McCulloch, for appellant.
Chas. C. Houpt, for respondent.
Reported in 83 N. W. 980.

Opinion:
PER OURIAM.
A verdict having been returned for defendant in the court below, plaintiff moved for a new trial on two grounds: First, that the verdict of the jury was not justified by the evidence and is contrary to law; second, for error in law occurring at the trial, and excepted to by the plaintiff. The motion for a new trial was denied, and plaintiff appealed.
The only assignment of error is as follows: "The court erred in refusing plaintiff a new trial." Under the authority of Stevens v. City of Minneapolis, 42 Minn. 136, 43 N. W. 842, the assignment is wholly insufficient.
Order affirmed.