Case Name: ROBERT COLLINS SMITH, Petitioner, v. ROBERT McCARTHY, as Director of Motor Vehicles, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1960-06-02
Citations: 54 Cal. 2d 863
Docket Number: L. A. No. 25806
Parties: ROBERT COLLINS SMITH, Petitioner, v. ROBERT McCARTHY, as Director of Motor Vehicles, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Reports
Volume: 54
Pages: 863–863

Head Matter:
353 F.2d 293]
[L. A. No. 25806.
In Bank.
June 2, 1960.]
ROBERT COLLINS SMITH, Petitioner, v. ROBERT McCARTHY, as Director of Motor Vehicles, Respondent.
Robert J. North for Petitioner.
Stanley Mosk, Attorney General, E. G. Funke, Assistant Attorney General, Warren H. Deering and Arthur de Goede, Deputy Attorneys General, for Respondent.

Opinion:
THE COURT.
This proceeding presents the same problem as that disposed of in Hough v. McCarthy, ante, p. 273 [5 Cal.Rptr. 668, 353 P.2d 276], and Sauer v. McCarthy, ante, p. 295 [5 Cal.Rptr. 682, 353 P.2d 290], decided this day, and those decisions are controlling here.
The alternative writ of mandate is discharged, and a peremptory writ is denied.