Case Name: Anthony BERRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2011-06-07
Citations: 341 S.W.3d 904
Docket Number: No. ED 94656
Parties: Anthony BERRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 341
Pages: 904–905

Head Matter:
Anthony BERRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 94656.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
June 7, 2011.
Jo Ann Rotermund, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Chris Foster, Atty. Gen., John M. Reeves, Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Anthony Berry (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying, without an eviden-tiary hearing, his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).