Case Name: Michael J. CURTIN and Erica Curtin, Appellants, v. The HARTFORD INSURANCE GROUP, a Foreign Corporation, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-08-14
Citations: 677 So. 2d 1002
Docket Number: No. 95-0923
Parties: Michael J. CURTIN and Erica Curtin, Appellants, v. The HARTFORD INSURANCE GROUP, a Foreign Corporation, Appellee.
Judges: KLEIN and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 677
Pages: 1002–1003

Head Matter:
Michael J. CURTIN and Erica Curtin, Appellants, v. The HARTFORD INSURANCE GROUP, a Foreign Corporation, Appellee.
No. 95-0923.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Aug. 14, 1996.
Keith M. Krasnove of The Krasnove Law Firm, P.A., Coral Springs, for appellants.
Judith W. Simmons and Mark M. Scha-baeker of Frank, Schabacker, Gramling, Simmons & Dunlap, Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
FARMER, Judge.
We reverse the summary judgment in this case upon a conclusion that a deposition on file demonstrated triable issues of fact. Moreover, the record establishes that the opponent of the motion had not completed discovery, especially a deposition of an employee of the moving party which had been rescheduled at the request of the movant for a day after the hearing on the motion. In this latter regard, we find this case indistinguishable from our recent decision in Lubarsky v. Sweden House Properties of Boca Raton Inc., 673 So.2d 975 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
REVERSED.
KLEIN and GROSS, JJ., concur.