Case Name: PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY v. Carlyle REYNOLDS et al.; PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY v. Arthur WISCOMBE et al.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1955-08-05
Citations: 230 F.2d 953
Docket Number: Nos. 4877, 4879-4906
Parties: PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY v. Carlyle REYNOLDS et al. PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY v. Arthur WISCOMBE et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 230
Pages: 953–953

Head Matter:
PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY v. Carlyle REYNOLDS et al. PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY v. Arthur WISCOMBE et al.
Nos. 4877, 4879-4906.
United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.
Aug. 5, 1955.
Rayburn L. Foster, Harry D. Turner, George L. Sneed and James G. Williams, Jr., Bartlesville, Okl., and Clair M. Senior, Salt Lake City, Utah, for appellant.
Olin Wellborn, III, Vernon Barrett, and Frank C. Hubbard, Los Angeles, Cal., Ray Dillman and R. Earl Dillman, Roosevelt, Utah, and Hugh W. Colton, Vernal, Utah, for appellees.
Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and HUXMAN and MURRAH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Judgments reversed and remanded, pursuant to stipulation on authority of cases, Phillips Petroleum Company v. Heber A. Peterson (Phillips Petroleum Company v. Haslem), 10 Cir., 218 F.2d 926.