Case Name: Kimberly Laray GRICE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JACKSON-MADISON COUNTY GENERAL HOSPITAL, a/k/a West Tennessee Healthcare, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-06-27
Citations: 570 F. App'x 539
Docket Number: No. 13-6568
Parties: Kimberly Laray GRICE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JACKSON-MADISON COUNTY GENERAL HOSPITAL, a/k/a West Tennessee Healthcare, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before: SUTTON and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges; and SARGUS, District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 570
Pages: 539–540

Head Matter:
Kimberly Laray GRICE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JACKSON-MADISON COUNTY GENERAL HOSPITAL, a/k/a West Tennessee Healthcare, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 13-6568.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
June 27, 2014.
Before: SUTTON and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges; and SARGUS, District Judge.
The Honorable Edmund A. Sargus, Jr., United States District Judge for the Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Kimberly Grice appeals the district court's order granting defendant's motion for summary judgment. We review the district court's determination de novo. See Keith v. Cnty. of Oakland, 703 F.3d 918, 923 (6th Cir.2013).
After carefully reviewing the record, the parties' briefs, and the applicable law, we find no error in the district court's judgment. The reasoning that supports the judgment was clearly and persuasively articulated by the district court, and our issuance of a detailed written opinion would be unduly duplicative and serve no jurisprudential purpose. We therefore af firm the district court's judgment for the reasons stated in that court's opinion. See Grice v. Jackson-Madison Cnty. Gen. Hosp. Dist., 981 F.Supp.2d 719 (W.D.Tenn. 2013).
The judgment of the district court is affirmed.