Case Name: DANIEL A. PALLADINO, RESPONDENT, v. ANDREA RAIO ET AL., APPELLANTS
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1928-10-15
Citations: 105 N.J.L. 246
Docket Number: 
Parties: DANIEL A. PALLADINO, RESPONDENT, v. ANDREA RAIO ET AL., APPELLANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 105
Pages: 246–246

Head Matter:
DANIEL A. PALLADINO, RESPONDENT, v. ANDREA RAIO ET AL., APPELLANTS.
Argued May 23, 1928
Decided October 15, 1928.
For the respondent, Fugene Liotta.
For the appellants, Egidio W. Mascia.

Opinion:
Pee Cueiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Teenchabd, Paekee, Mintubn, Ka-LISCH, KaTZENBACH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, YAH BuSKIEK, Mc-Glennon, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.