Case Name: Wayne Earl WILSON, Plaintiff in Error, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Defendant in Error
Court: Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1966-06-01
Citations: 415 P.2d 179
Docket Number: No. A-13933
Parties: Wayne Earl WILSON, Plaintiff in Error, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Defendant in Error.
Judges: NIX and BRETT, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Pacific Reporter 2d
Volume: 415
Pages: 179–180

Head Matter:
Wayne Earl WILSON, Plaintiff in Error, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Defendant in Error.
No. A-13933.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.
June 1, 1966.
Carl A. Back, Tulsa, for plaintiff in error.
Charles Nesbitt, Atty. Gen. of Oklahoma, Hugh H. Collum, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BUSSEY, Presiding Judge.
Wayne Earl Wilson was charged, tried and convicted of the offense of Reckless Driving in the Municipal Criminal Court of the City of Tulsa, Oklahoma. Judgment and sentence fixing his punishment at ten days confinement in the county jail was entered on the 9th day of December, 1965. Petition in Error, with casemade attached, was filed with the Clerk of this Court on the 1st day of March, 1966. Thereafter, the State of Oklahoma, by and through its Attorney General, filed a Motion to Dismiss said attempted appeal for the reason that a written notice of intent to appeal and request for casemade was not filed at the time of rendition of judgment and sentence or within ten days thereafter.
We have carefully examined the record and find that the same does not contain a written notice of intent to appeal and request for casemade as required by 22 O.S.A. § 1060, effective May, 1965. In accordance with Masters v. State, Okl.Cr., 408 P.2d 801, we must sustain the State's Motion to Dismiss. Appeal dismissed.
NIX and BRETT, JJ., concur.