Case Name: NORTHERN TRUST COMPANY, N.A. Thomas A. Leonard and Raymond L. Leonard, as Personal Representatives of the Estate of Talbert Armlon Leonard, Jr., Appellants, v. PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-10-03
Citations: 552 So. 2d 1123
Docket Number: Nos. 86-2954, 86-3083 and 88-3074
Parties: NORTHERN TRUST COMPANY, N.A. Thomas A. Leonard and Raymond L. Leonard, as Personal Representatives of the Estate of Talbert Armlon Leonard, Jr., Appellants, v. PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 552
Pages: 1123–1123

Head Matter:
NORTHERN TRUST COMPANY, N.A. Thomas A. Leonard and Raymond L. Leonard, as Personal Representatives of the Estate of Talbert Armlon Leonard, Jr., Appellants, v. PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.
Nos. 86-2954, 86-3083 and 88-3074.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 3, 1989.
Rehearing Denied Dec. 12, 1989.
Stinson, Lyons, Gerlin & Bustamante, Daniels and Hicks and Ralph 0. Anderson, Miami, for appellants.
Steel, Hector & Davis and Joseph P. Kloek, Jr. and John W. Little III, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
ON MOTION TO REVIEW ORDER ENFORCING MANDATE
PER CURIAM.
The trial court was entirely correct in entering final judgment for the insurer upon the opinion and mandate in Provident Life & Acc. Ins. v. Leonard, 526 So.2d 721 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) because the effect of our reversal of the original final summary judgment and affirmance of the cross-appeal necessarily foreclosed all issues embraced in the counterclaims of the insured. For this reason, we deny the insured's motion to review order enforcing the mandate of this court.
Motion denied.