Case Name: COMPANIA DE SEGUROS CONDOR, S.A., Appellant, v. COPENHAGEN REINSURANCE COMPANY (U.K.) LTD, et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2004-04-14
Citations: 879 So. 2d 1242
Docket Number: No. 3D03-2655
Parties: COMPANIA DE SEGUROS CONDOR, S.A., Appellant, v. COPENHAGEN REINSURANCE COMPANY (U.K.) LTD, et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before GERSTEN, GODERICH, and FLETCHER, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 879
Pages: 1242–1243

Head Matter:
COMPANIA DE SEGUROS CONDOR, S.A., Appellant, v. COPENHAGEN REINSURANCE COMPANY (U.K.) LTD, et al., Appellees.
No. 3D03-2655.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 14, 2004.
Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied Aug. 11, 2004.
Horr, Novak & Skipp, P.A., and Patrick E. Novak, and Stephanie H. Wylie, Miami, for appellant.
Fertig and Gramling, and Darlene M. Lidondici (Fort Lauderdale); Meckler Bul-ger & Tilson, and Michael S. Loeffler and Charlotte S. Kormendy, for appellees.
Before GERSTEN, GODERICH, and FLETCHER, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We reverse determining the trial court lacked personal jurisdiction over the case. See Venetian Salami Co. v. Parthenais, 554 So.2d 499 (Fla.1989); Ganiko v. Ganiko, 826 So.2d 391 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); Christus St. Joseph's Health Sys. v. Witt Biomedical Corp., 805 So.2d 1050 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); Bruzzone Roldos v. Americargo Lines, Inc., 698 So.2d 1368 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).
Reversed and remanded.