Case Name: Eugene H. Duffy, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, et al., Appellants, v. James W. Wetzler et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1999-09-16
Citations: 93 N.Y.2d 1035
Docket Number: 
Parties: Eugene H. Duffy, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, et al., Appellants, v James W. Wetzler et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 93
Pages: 1035–1036

Head Matter:
Eugene H. Duffy, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, et al., Appellants, v James W. Wetzler et al., Respondents.
Submitted September 13, 1999;
decided September 16, 1999

Opinion:
Appeal, insofar as taken from that part of the Appellate Division order that affirmed so much of Supreme Court's order as denied appellants' cross motion to amend the complaint and dismissed appellants' appeal from so much of Supreme Court's order as denied appellants' motion for reargument, dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that such part of the Appellate Division order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; appeal otherwise dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.