Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Jaime TOLENTINO-TAVERA, Defendant - Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-02-19
Citations: 56 F. App'x 398
Docket Number: No. 02-10276; D.C. No. CR-01-00137-DWH
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Jaime TOLENTINO-TAVERA, Defendant — Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 56
Pages: 398–399

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Jaime TOLENTINO-TAVERA, Defendant — Appellant.
No. 02-10276.
D.C. No. CR-01-00137-DWH.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 14, 2003.
Decided Feb. 19, 2003.
Before TROTT, RYMER, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Jaime Tolentino-Tavera challenges the district court's use of Ninth Circuit Model Criminal Jury Instruction 9.2. We have previously approved the use of this instruction. United States v. Barajas-Mon-tiel, 185 F.3d 947, 953-54 (9th Cir.1999). We have also held that actual transportation under 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii) is a general, not specific, intent crime. United States v. Ramirez-Martinez, 273 F.3d 903, 914 (9th Cir.2001). Accordingly, there was no error.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.