Case Name: Emmitt Antoine ALEXANDER, Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE and Nikkita Benise Houston, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2015-09-30
Citations: 174 So. 3d 1127
Docket Number: No. 1D15-2513
Parties: Emmitt Antoine ALEXANDER, Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE and Nikkita Benise Houston, Appellees.
Judges: ROBERTS, C.J., MARSTILLER and MAKAR, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 174
Pages: 1127–1127

Head Matter:
Emmitt Antoine ALEXANDER, Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE and Nikkita Benise Houston, Appellees.
No. 1D15-2513.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Sept. 30, 2015.
Emmitt Antoine Alexander, pro se Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Inasmuch as a transcript of the administrative proceeding that resulted in the order on appeal cannot be produced due to a malfunction in the recording equipment, we REVERSE and REMAND for a hearing de novo. See N. Dade Sec. Ltd. v. Dep't of State, Div. of Licensing, 530 So.2d 1040 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).
ROBERTS, C.J., MARSTILLER and MAKAR, JJ., concur.