Case Name: Larry JORDAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION; Emilio Pagan, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-02-28
Citations: 56 F. App'x 197
Docket Number: No. 03-6083
Parties: Larry JORDAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION; Emilio Pagan, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 56
Pages: 197–198

Head Matter:
Larry JORDAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION; Emilio Pagan, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 03-6083.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 20, 2003.
Decided Feb. 28, 2003.
Larry Jordan, Appellant Pro Se.
Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Larry Jordan appeals from the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action for failure to comply with the court's order directing Jordan to amend his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. In the briefing order, Jordan was warned that this court would not consider issues not specifically raised in his informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Nonetheless, Jordan's informal brief does not challenge the grounds for the district court's dismissal of his complaint, but instead addresses the merits of his claims. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.