Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Stephen BOWDEN, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2015-11-24
Citations: 481 S.W.3d 563
Docket Number: No. ED 101805
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Stephen BOWDEN, Appellant.
Judges: Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Patricia L. Cohen, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 481
Pages: 563–563

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Stephen BOWDEN, Appellant.
No. ED 101805
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
Filed: November 24, 2015
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied January 4, 2016
Application for Transfer Denied March 1, 2016
Srikant Chigurupati, Assistant Public Defender, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.
Evan J. Buchheim, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 66102, for respondent.
Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Patricia L. Cohen, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Stephen Bowden (Defendant) appeals the judgment of conviction that the Circuit Court of the City of' St. Louis entered after finding Defendant guilty of leaving the scene of a motor vehicle accident. Defendant claims the trial court abused its discretion in admitting hearsay testimony relating to the estimated cost of repairs for the damaged .vehicle.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court's decision was not dearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value.- We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the- use of the parties' setting .forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).