Case Name: Charles W. Clackett et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Laurel Mills Company, Respondents, v. Max Kleppel et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Kleppel & Perlman, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1944-06-26
Citations: 268 A.D. 796
Docket Number: 
Parties: Charles W. Clackett et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Laurel Mills Company, Respondents, v. Max Kleppel et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Kleppel & Perlman, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 268
Pages: 796–796

Head Matter:
Charles W. Clackett et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Laurel Mills Company, Respondents, v. Max Kleppel et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Kleppel & Perlman, Appellants.

Opinion:
Order denying motion by defendants to dismiss the amended complaint upon the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to'appellants to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Close, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Lewis and Aldrich, JJ., concur.