Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. BRUCE ALLEN BOURRIE, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1989-02-22
Citations: 95 Or. App. 379
Docket Number: CF85-223; CA A48244
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. BRUCE ALLEN BOURRIE, Appellant.
Judges: Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Newman and Deits, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 95
Pages: 379–380

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted October 28,1988,
remanded for order vacating minimum sentence; otherwise affirmed February 22, 1989
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. BRUCE ALLEN BOURRIE, Appellant.
(CF85-223; CA A48244)
768 P2d 446
Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.
Christine Chute, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.
Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Newman and Deits, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant was found guilty of delivery of a controlled substance and the court imposed a sentence of 10 years, suspended its execution and placed defendant on probation for five years. Later, the court revoked probation and ordered that
"defendant shall be committed to the Correctional Division [sic] for a period of ten (10) years, with a seventeen (17) month minimum."
Defendant first argues that the court abused its discretion when it revoked his probation. There is no merit to that assignment.
He also contends that the court had no authority to modify the sentence previously imposed by adding the minimum term. The state concedes error. We agree. State v. Stevens, 253 Or 563, 456 P2d 494 (1969); State v. Mossman, 75 Or App 385, 706 P2d 203 (1985).
Remanded for an order vacating the minimum sentence; otherwise affirmed.