Case Name: MATTIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. VANCIL, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1949-03-02
Citations: 54 Ohio Law Abs. 496
Docket Number: No. 2043
Parties: MATTIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. VANCIL, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: MILLER, PJ, HORNBECK and WISEMAN, JJ, concur.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 54
Pages: 496–496

Head Matter:
MATTIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. VANCIL, Defendant-Appellant.
Ohio Appeals, Second District, Montgomery County.
No. 2043.
Decided March 2, 1949.
Arthur W. Meyring, Dayton, for plaintiff-appellee. „
D. H. Wysong, Dayton, for defendant-appellant.

Opinion:
OPINION
By THE COURT:
Submitted on motion of plaintiff-appellee to dismiss the appeal on questions of law and fact on the ground that it is not a chancery action. An examination of the record discloses that this is a civil action for the recovery of money only. The motion to dismiss the appeal on questions of law and fact will be sustained. The case will be retained as an appeal on questions of law.
The court orders a bill of exceptions, assignments of error and briefs to be filed in conformity to the provisions of Supplement to Rule VII.
Counsel will draw the proper entry.
MILLER, PJ, HORNBECK and WISEMAN, JJ, concur.