Case Name: Adam Farkas v. Albert M. Sadler et al.
Court: Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Jurisdiction: Rhode Island
Decision Date: 1976-12-20
Citations: 117 R.I. 958
Docket Number: Appeal No. 75-30
Parties: Adam Farkas v. Albert M. Sadler et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Rhode Island Reports
Volume: 117
Pages: 958–959

Head Matter:
Appeal No. 75-30.
Adam Farkas v. Albert M. Sadler et al.

Opinion:
Case is assigned to the calendar for February 7, 1977, 9:30 a.m. for oral argument. The plaintiff will be expected to show cause why his appeal should not be summarily disposed of because of this Court's previous statement that in situations such as this the court will not disturb a finding of the trial justice unless he was clearly wrong. Labree v. Major 111, R.I. 657, 306 A.2d 808 (1973). He should also be prepared to discuss in what man ner the trial justice overlooked or misconceived material evidence on a material point and was clearly wrong. Malinowski v. Zalzal, 113 R.I. 90, 317 A.2d 875 (1974).
Adam Farkas, pro se, plaintiff. Keenan, Bice, Dolan, Reardon & Kiernan, James A. Currier, Hanson, Curran, Bowen & Parks, Kenneth R. Neal, for defendants.