Case Name: Kevin HARMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2010-04-20
Citations: 308 S.W.3d 306
Docket Number: No. ED 93461
Parties: Kevin HARMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 308
Pages: 306–307

Head Matter:
Kevin HARMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 93461.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
April 20, 2010.
Timothy Forneris, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Jamie Pamela Rasmussen, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Kevin Harman (Movant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Francois County denying, without an evi-dentiary hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).