Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Priscilla Lee RASCO, also known as Priscilla Rasco, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-02-21
Citations: 677 F. App'x 181
Docket Number: No. 16-50358 Conference Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Priscilla Lee RASCO, also known as Priscilla Rasco, Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before JOLLY, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 677
Pages: 181–181

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Priscilla Lee RASCO, also known as Priscilla Rasco, Defendant-Appellant
No. 16-50358 Conference Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed February 21, 2017
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Priscilla Lee Rasco, Pro Se
Before JOLLY, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Priscilla Lee Rasco has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rasco has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cíe. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir, R. 47.5.4.