Case Name: Ned N. CARY, Jr., Morning Star Baptist Church, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sterling PERRY, James City County Police; Michael McGinty, Commonwealth of Virginia; Shawn Miller, Anheuser-Bush Incorporated; Anheuser-Busch, Incorporated, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-11-15
Citations: 254 F. App'x 167
Docket Number: No. 07-1459
Parties: Ned N. CARY, Jr., Morning Star Baptist Church, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Sterling PERRY, James City County Police; Michael McGinty, Commonwealth of Virginia; Shawn Miller, Anheuser-Bush Incorporated; Anheuser-Busch, Incorporated, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 254
Pages: 167–167

Head Matter:
Ned N. CARY, Jr., Morning Star Baptist Church, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Sterling PERRY, James City County Police; Michael McGinty, Commonwealth of Virginia; Shawn Miller, Anheuser-Bush Incorporated; Anheuser-Busch, Incorporated, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 07-1459.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 6, 2007.
Decided: Nov. 15, 2007.
Ned N. Cary, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Leo Paul Rogers, Jr., James City County Attorney, Williamsburg, Virginia; Jeff Wayne Rosen, Lisa Ehrich, Pender & Coward, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Leonard C. Heath, Jr., Jones, Blechman, Woltz & Kelly, PC, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Ned N. Cary, Jr. appeals the district court's order dismissing this action challenging Cary's termination from employment and imposing monetary sanctions and a prefiling injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cary v. Perry, No. 4:05-cv-00047 (E.D.Va. Apr. 2, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
The district court dismissed Sheriff Perry on statute of limitations and res judicata grounds. We affirm his dismissal on limitations grounds only. We note, moreover, that he was not alleged to have played any role in Cary's termination.