Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Manuel Mendoza HERNANDEZ, also known as Jose Manuel Mendoza-Hernandez, also known as Jose Hernandez, also known as Emanurl Hernandez Arteca, also known as Marino Sanches Vasquez, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-08-20
Citations: 539 F. App'x 401
Docket Number: No. 12-20686
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Manuel Mendoza HERNANDEZ, also known as Jose Manuel Mendoza-Hernandez, also known as Jose Hernandez, also known as Emanurl Hernandez Arteca, also known as Marino Sanches Vasquez, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 539
Pages: 401–402

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Manuel Mendoza HERNANDEZ, also known as Jose Manuel Mendoza-Hernandez, also known as Jose Hernandez, also known as Emanurl Hernandez Arteca, also known as Marino Sanches Vasquez, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-20686
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 20, 2013.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Sarah Beth Landau, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Manuel Mendoza Hernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Mendoza Hernandez has been released from prison and has been removed from the United States. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as frivolous, see 5th CiR. R. 42.2, and in part as moot, see United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis, 483 F.3d 381, 382-83 (5th Cir.2007).
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.