Case Name: Clarence J. PERRY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J.P. FULTON, Judge: Norfolk Circuit Court; S. Catherine Dodson, Commonwealth Attorney Norfolk Circuit Court; Walter B. Dalton, Court-Appointed Attorney Norfolk Circuit Court, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-03-06
Citations: 315 F. App'x 487
Docket Number: No. 08-7953
Parties: Clarence J. PERRY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J.P. FULTON, Judge: Norfolk Circuit Court; S. Catherine Dodson, Commonwealth Attorney Norfolk Circuit Court; Walter B. Dalton, Court-Appointed Attorney Norfolk Circuit Court, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 315
Pages: 487–487

Head Matter:
Clarence J. PERRY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J.P. FULTON, Judge: Norfolk Circuit Court; S. Catherine Dodson, Commonwealth Attorney Norfolk Circuit Court; Walter B. Dalton, Court-Appointed Attorney Norfolk Circuit Court, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 08-7953.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 26, 2009.
Decided: March 6, 2009.
Clarence J. Perry, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Clarence J. Perry, Jr., appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1985, 1986 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Perry v. Fulton, No. 2:08-cv-00368-MSD-TEM (E.D.Va. Aug. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.