Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sherif Safwat EZZAT, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-07-02
Citations: 328 F. App'x 276
Docket Number: No. 09-6301
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sherif Safwat EZZAT, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 328
Pages: 276–277

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sherif Safwat EZZAT, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-6301.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 15, 2009.
Decided: July 2, 2009.
Michael S. Nachmanoff, Federal Public Defender, Darren J. Johnson, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Dana J. Boente, Acting United States Attorney, Lawrence J. Leiser, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Sherif Safwat Ezzat appeals the district court's order granting his motion for sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006), but denying his request for a reduction below the range of imprisonment suggested by the reconfigured guidelines as a result of Amendment 706 to the Sentencing Guidelines. See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual, App. C. Amend. 706. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm based on our recent decision in United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir.2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.