Case Name: Joe E. MOORE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2004-06-09
Citations: 874 So. 2d 727
Docket Number: No. 3D04-963
Parties: Joe E. MOORE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before COPE, FLETCHER and RAMIREZ, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 874
Pages: 727–727

Head Matter:
Joe E. MOORE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D04-963.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
June 9, 2004.
Joe E. Moore, in proper person.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, for appellee.
Before COPE, FLETCHER and RAMIREZ, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Johnson v. State, 763 So.2d 283, 284-85 (Fla.2000) ("Prior to the amendments produced by chapter 95-182, robbery was one of the qualifying offenses which allowed a trial court to sentence a defendant as a habitual violent felony offender. See § 775.084(l)(b)l.c., Fla. Stat. (1993). Thus, Johnson would have qualified as a habitual violent felony offender prior to the amendments reflected in chapter 95-182.... In sum, we find that Johnson was not affected by the passage of chapter 95-182.").