Case Name: Withrow v. Williams; Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Sac and Fox Nation; Monroe Auto Equipment Co. v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW), Monroe Auto Equipment Company Unit of Local 878, In re McDonald; Seltzer v. Office of Personnel Management; DiNola v. Stewart et al.; Holly v. True, Warden, et al.; Beaumont et al. v. United States; Vey v. Wolfe, Attorney General of Pennsylvania; Hughes v. Borgert, Warden; Mix v. City of Hazel Park et al.; Morrison v. Estelle, Warden; Raphlah v. Texas, In re Harris; Watts v. Mazurkiewicz, Warden, et al.; Dempsey v. Harshbarger, Attorney General of Massachusetts
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1993-06-28
Citations: 509 U.S. 933
Docket Number: No. 91-1030; No. 92-259; No. 92-1512; No. 92-1551; No. 92-1565; No. 92-1724; No. 92-7249; No. 92-7893; No. 92-7955; No. 92-7958; No. 92-7974; No. 92-8009; No. 92-8092; No. 92-8103; No. 92-8107; No. 92-8259
Parties: Withrow v. Williams, Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Sac and Fox Nation, Monroe Auto Equipment Co. v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricul tural Implement Workers of America (UAW), Monroe Auto Equipment Company Unit of Local 878, In re McDonald, Seltzer v. Office of Personnel Management, DiNola v. Stewart et al., Holly v. True, Warden, et al., Beaumont et al. v. United States, Vey v. Wolfe, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, Hughes v. Borgert, Warden, Mix v. City of Hazel Park et al., Morrison v. Estelle, Warden, Raphlah v. Texas, In re Harris, Watts v. Mazurkiewicz, Warden, et al., Dempsey v. Harshbarger, Attorney General of Massachusetts,
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 509
Pages: 933–934

Head Matter:
No. 91-1030.
No. 92-259.
No. 92-1512.
Withrow v. Williams, Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Sac and Fox Nation, Monroe Auto Equipment Co. v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricul tural Implement Workers of America (UAW), Monroe Auto Equipment Company Unit of Local 878, In re McDonald, Seltzer v. Office of Personnel Management, DiNola v. Stewart et al., Holly v. True, Warden, et al., Beaumont et al. v. United States, Vey v. Wolfe, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, Hughes v. Borgert, Warden, Mix v. City of Hazel Park et al., Morrison v. Estelle, Warden, Raphlah v. Texas, In re Harris, Watts v. Mazurkiewicz, Warden, et al., Dempsey v. Harshbarger, Attorney General of Massachusetts,

Opinion:
507 U. S. 680; 508 U. S. 114; 508 U. S. 931; 508 U. S. 905; 508 U. S. 911; 508 U. S. 961; 508 U. S. 914; 507 U. S. 1054; 508 U. S. 918; 508 U. S. 918; 508 U. S. 919; 508 U. S. 920; 508 U. S. 922; 508 U. S. 905; 508 U. S. 923; and 508 U. S. 943.
No. 92-1551.
No. 92-1565.
No. 92-1724.
No. 92-7249.
No. 92-7893.
No. 92-7955.
No. 92-7958.
No. 92-7974.
No. 92-8009.
No. 92-8092.
No. 92-8103.
No. 92-8107.
No. 92-8259.
Petitions for rehearing denied.