Case Name: Joseph Senn, Respondent, v. William H. Welch and Etta Welch, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1927-05
Citations: 220 A.D. 800
Docket Number: 
Parties: Joseph Senn, Respondent, v. William H. Welch and Etta Welch, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 220
Pages: 800–800

Head Matter:
Joseph Senn, Respondent, v. William H. Welch and Etta Welch, Appellants.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that while the exclusion of defendant's statement that he had no knowledge of the frozen condition of the plumbing was error, his testimony as a whole made his claim in that regard clearly manifest so that no harm followed. The verdict is based on a fair conflict of evidence and should not under such circumstances be disturbed. All concur. Present — Hubbs, P. J., Clark, Sears, Taylor and Sawyer, JJ.