Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Keith POLLOCK, Appellant; Keith POLLOCK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-08-08
Citations: 903 S.W.2d 677
Docket Number: No. 64050
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Keith POLLOCK, Appellant. Keith POLLOCK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before SMITH, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and RHODES, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 903
Pages: 677–677

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Keith POLLOCK, Appellant. Keith POLLOCK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 64050.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Aug. 8, 1995.
Barbara Hoppe, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
fleremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Traci J. Sanders, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before SMITH, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and RHODES, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Keith Pollock, appeals from his jury-trial convictions for class A felony assault in the first degree, RSMo § 565.050 (1994), armed criminal action, RSMo § 571.015 (1994), and burglary in the first degree, RSMo § 569.160 (1994). Appellant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evi-dentiary hearing. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the convictions are supported by the evidence and not against the weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. We further find the denial of appellant's Rule 29.15 motion is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the circuit court's judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b). A memorandum solely for the use of the parties involved has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.