Case Name: Wylie MILLS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Buddy BLACKBURN; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-04-21
Citations: 274 F. App'x 563
Docket Number: No. 07-35666
Parties: Wylie MILLS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Buddy BLACKBURN; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 274
Pages: 563–564

Head Matter:
Wylie MILLS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Buddy BLACKBURN; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
No. 07-35666.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 15, 2008.
Filed April 21, 2008.
Wylie Mills, Yakima, WA, pro se.
Buddy Blackburn, Union Gap, WA, pro se.
Robert C. Tenney, Esq., Andrew W. Heinz, Esq., Meyer Fluegge & Tenney, PS, Yakima, WA, for City of Yakima.
Michael Barry Tierney, Esq., Mercer Island, WA, for City of Selah.
John T. Philipsborn, Esq., San Francisco, CA, for United Mexican States.
Before: B. FLETCHER, FISHER and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
This is an appeal from the district court's dismissal without prejudice for failure to identify a basis for federal subject matter jurisdiction in the first amended complaint.
The Clerk shall file the motions to reinstate the appeal, received on January 22, 2008 and April 1, 2008. The motions to reinstate the appeal are granted. The court's December 31, 2007 order is vacated.
The court has reviewed the record, the opening brief, and the response to the court's November 15, 2007 order to show cause. This review shows that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.
All pending motions are denied as moot.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.