Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Glafiro GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-04-20
Citations: 228 F. App'x 645
Docket Number: No. 05-10676
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Glafiro GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 228
Pages: 645–646

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Glafiro GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-10676.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted: April 16, 2007 .
Filed: April 20, 2007.
Kathleen A. Servatius, Esq., USF—Office of the U.S. Attorney, Fresno, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Gary L. Huss, Esq., Wild Carter & Tip-ton A Professional Corporation, Fresno, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Glafiro Gonzalez appeals from his jury-trial conviction and 300-month sentence for aiding and abetting, conspiracy and distribution of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 2, 846 and 841(a)(1), respectively. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Gonzalez's counsel has filed a brief stating that he finds no meritorious issues for review, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Appellant has filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Our examination of the briefs and our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no arguable issues for review on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.