Case Name: Cosmos Shipping Company, Inc. v. United States
Court: United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1972-11-02
Citations: 60 C.C.P.A. 9
Docket Number: No. 5495, C.A.D. 1072
Parties: Cosmos Shipping Company, Inc. v. United States
Judges: Before Markey, Chief Judge, Rich, Almond, Baldwin, and Lane, Associate Judges
Reporter: Court of Customs and Patent Appeals Reports
Volume: 60
Pages: 9–10

Head Matter:
467 F. 2d 1359
Cosmos Shipping Company, Inc. v. United States
(No. 5495, C.A.D. 1072)
United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals,
November 2, 1972
JJurson L. Schweller, attorney of record, for appellant.
.Barlington Wood, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Andrew P. Vance, Chief, Customs Section, James Caffenteis for the United States.
[Oral argument October 4„ 1972 by Mr. Sehweller ana ;Mr. Caffentzis],
Before Markey, Chief Judge, Rich, Almond, Baldwin, and Lane, Associate Judges

Opinion:
Pee Curiam.
This is an appeal from the decision and judgment of the United States Customs Court, Third Division, 67 Cust. Ct. 281, C.D. 4285 (1971), overruling appellant's protest against the classification of the imported tubes of toothpaste as cosmetics and other toilet preparations, not containing alcohol, under TSUS item 46.P40, rather than as •duty-free- samples, valued not over $1 each, to be iised in the United States only for soliciting orders for products, of foreign. countries under TSUS item 860.30. .
Finding no reversible error below, we affirm- the judgment of the Customs Court.