Case Name: Armando Cruz AGUILAR, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-11-06
Citations: 80 F. App'x 600
Docket Number: No. 02-71118
Parties: Armando Cruz AGUILAR, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.
Judges: Before: BRIGHT, O’SCANNLAIN, and MCKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 80
Pages: 600–601

Head Matter:
Armando Cruz AGUILAR, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.
No. 02-71118.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 4, 2003.
Decided Nov. 6, 2003.
Robert A. Espinoza, Santa Fe Springs, CA, for Petitioner.
Regional Counsel, Western Region, Laguna Niguel, CA, Los Angeles District Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, San Francisco, CA, Douglas E. Ginsburg, and Edward C. Durant, Esq., DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: BRIGHT, O’SCANNLAIN, and MCKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
The Honorable Myron H. Bright, United States Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
The record confirms that, before his trip to Mexico, Aguilar received notice that the INS had issued a final denial of his application for temporary resident status. Aguilar was not granted advance parole and later attempted to reenter the United States with an invalid entry document. The INS properly placed Aguilar in exclusion proceedings. See Landon v. Plasencia, 459 U.S. 21, 28, 103 S.Ct. 321, 74 L.Ed.2d 21 (1982).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.