Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DREXEL RAE HASKINS, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1993-07-14
Citations: 121 Or. App. 671
Docket Number: 9105-0915A; CA A73553
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DREXEL RAE HASKINS, Appellant.
Judges: Before Rossman, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Leeson, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 121
Pages: 671–672

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted May 28,
affirmed July 14,
reconsideration denied September 29,
petition for review denied November 30, 1993 (318 Or 98)
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DREXEL RAE HASKINS, Appellant.
(9105-0915A; CA A73553)
855 P2d 667
Sally L. Avera, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.
Janet A. Klapstein, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.
Before Rossman, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Leeson, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant was charged with burglary in the first degree and aggravated theft. ORS 164.225; ORS 164.057. Pursuant to plea negotiations, defendant pled no contest to the burglary offense, and the state dismissed the theft charge. Defendant's sentence resulted from the agreement, and we may not review her claim of error that the departure sentence imposed was not supported by substantial and compelling reasons. ORS 138.222(2)(d); State v. Adams, 315 Or 359, 847 P2d 397 (1993); State v. Tanner, 121 Or App 104, 854 P2d 941 (1993); State v. Kilborn, 120 Or App 462, 852 P2d 935 (1993); State v. Johnston, 120 Or App 165, 851 P2d 1156 (1993).
Affirmed.