Case Name: Christopher Dana McNALLY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent; Albert ROBERTS, III, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1984-02-24
Citations: 445 So. 2d 703
Docket Number: No. 84-250
Parties: Christopher Dana McNALLY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent. Albert ROBERTS, III, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: BOARDMAN, A.C.J., and DANAHY and LEHAN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 445
Pages: 703–703

Head Matter:
Christopher Dana McNALLY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent. Albert ROBERTS, III, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 84-250.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Feb. 24, 1984.
John M. Edman, St. Petersburg, for petitioner Albert Roberts, III.
James D. Eckert, St. Petersburg, for petitioner Christopher McNally.
James T. Russell, State Atty., Russell K. Bausch, Asst. State Atty., Clearwater, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari is denied. Petitioners will have an adequate remedy, if necessary, by plenary appeal to the circuit court and then by petition for writ of certiorari to this court after the conclusion of all proceedings in the trial court.
BOARDMAN, A.C.J., and DANAHY and LEHAN, JJ., concur.