Case Name: Kathleen A. FERRERO, Appellant, v. Frank A. FERRERO, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1983-11-22
Citations: 441 So. 2d 1152
Docket Number: No. 82-2177
Parties: Kathleen A. FERRERO, Appellant, v. Frank A. FERRERO, Appellee.
Judges: Before HENDRY, HUBBART and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 441
Pages: 1152–1152

Head Matter:
Kathleen A. FERRERO, Appellant, v. Frank A. FERRERO, Appellee.
No. 82-2177.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 22, 1983.
Gersten & Vitale and Mark L. Deutsch, Miami, for appellant.
Young, Stern & Tannenbaum and Glen Rafkin, North Miami Beach, for appellee.
Before HENDRY, HUBBART and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Finding that reasonable persons could differ as to the propriety of the trial court's action, it follows that no abuse of discretion has been shown, and the judgment may not be disturbed. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197, 1203 (Fla.1982). See Price v. Price, 389 So.2d 666 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).
Affirmed.