Case Name: GREEN, Appellant, v. C & H CONTRACTORS, INC. et al, Respondents
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1981-07-20
Citations: 53 Or. App. 187
Docket Number: 79-3502-L-2; CA A20064
Parties: GREEN, Appellant, v. C & H CONTRACTORS, INC. et al, Respondents.
Judges: Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Warren, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 53
Pages: 187–188

Head Matter:
Submitted on record and briefs June 5,
appeal dismissed July 20, 1981
GREEN, Appellant, v. C & H CONTRACTORS, INC. et al, Respondents.
(79-3502-L-2; CA A20064)
631 P2d 794
Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, John R. McCulloch, Jr., Solicitor General, William F. Gary, Deputy Solicitor General, and James C- Rhodes, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for appellant.
Brian L. Pocock, Eugene, filed the brief for respondents.
Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Warren, Judges.
PER CURIAM.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of the individual defendants entered after those defendants' demurrer to the complaint had been sustained and plaintiff declined to plead further.
Apparently, the issue intended to be presented on appeal is whether plaintiff's complaint stated a cause of action under ORS 656.735(4), which provides:
"(4) When a noncomplying employer is a corporation, such corporation and the officers and directors thereof shall be jointly and severally liable for any civil penalties assessed under this section and any claim costs incurred under ORS 656.054."
However, nowhere in the appellant's brief are the relevant allegations of the complaint set forth verbatim, and neither is the defendant's demurrer to that complaint set forth. There is no abstract. Appellant's brief does not conform to Rules 7.19 or 7.25, Rules of Appellate Procedure, and we decline to consider the error assigned. See State v. Mendenhall, 53 Or App 174, 631 P2d 791 (1981).
Appeal dismissed.