Case Name: Cecil G. SALAZAR, Appellant, v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, and City of West Palm Beach, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-06-12
Citations: 674 So. 2d 937
Docket Number: No. 95-3237
Parties: Cecil G. SALAZAR, Appellant, v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, and City of West Palm Beach, Appellees.
Judges: GLICKSTEIN, WARNER and POLEN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 674
Pages: 937–938

Head Matter:
Cecil G. SALAZAR, Appellant, v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, and City of West Palm Beach, Appellees.
No. 95-3237.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
June 12, 1996.
Mark F. Carbonell and Isidro M. Garcia, Vassallo & Garcia, P.A., Lake Worth, for appellant.
John D. Maher, Tallahassee, for appellee— Unemployment Appeals Commission.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the UAC's decision denying benefits and remand with direction to reinstate the award made by the appeals referee. It is not the role of the UAC to modify or add facts. See Palmere v. Computerland, 626 So.2d 1114 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); David Clark & Assoc., Inc. v. Kennedy, 390 So.2d 149 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).
GLICKSTEIN, WARNER and POLEN, JJ., concur.