Case Name: Roosevelt TURNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Vernon HOUSEWRIGHT, et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1985-12-26
Citations: 779 F.2d 29
Docket Number: No. 85-1608
Parties: Roosevelt TURNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Vernon HOUSEWRIGHT, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before ANDERSON, and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges, and TASHIMA, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 779
Pages: 29–29

Head Matter:
Roosevelt TURNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Vernon HOUSEWRIGHT, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 85-1608.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 14, 1985.
Decided Dec. 26, 1985.
N. Patrick Flanagan, III, Appellate Federal Public Defender, Reno, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.
Thomas P. Wright, Dist. Atty. Gen., Carson City, Nev., for defendants-appellees.
Before ANDERSON, and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges, and TASHIMA, District Judge.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R. App.P. 34(a) and Ninth Circuit Rule 3(f).
The Honorable A. Wallace Tashima, United States District Judge, Central District of California, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Roosevelt Turner appeals from the district court's denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. After reviewing the record, we are satisfied that the district court's denial of habeas relief was correct. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's well-reasoned opinion. 599 F.Supp. 1358 (D.Nev.1984).