Case Name: In re the Marriage of James Reginold FAULK, Sr., Husband/Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Patricia Ann FAULK, Wife/Appellee/Cross-Appellant
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1988-10-19
Citations: 532 So. 2d 98
Docket Number: No. 88-460
Parties: In re the Marriage of James Reginold FAULK, Sr., Husband/Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Patricia Ann FAULK, Wife/Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
Judges: ERVIN, WENTWORTH and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 532
Pages: 98–98

Head Matter:
In re the Marriage of James Reginold FAULK, Sr., Husband/Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Patricia Ann FAULK, Wife/Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
No. 88-460.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Oct. 19, 1988.
Michael W. Jones, Gainesville, for husband/appellant/cross-appellee.
Zelda J. Hawk, Gainesville, for wife/ap-pellee/cross-appellant.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We find no merit to any issue raised on appeal or cross-appeal with the exception of the husband's contention that the trial court erred in awarding attorney's fees to the wife. The undisputed evidence reveals that the wife received marital property and income substantially equal to the husband, and thus she is in a position to bear the cost of her attorney's fees. See Cortina v. Cortina, 461 So.2d 964 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
ERVIN, WENTWORTH and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.