Case Name: Albert Ritchie, as Receiver, etc., App'lt, v. Seaboard National Bank, Resp't
Court: New York Court of Common Pleas
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1895-04-01
Citations: 66 N.Y. St. Rep. 357
Docket Number: 
Parties: Albert Ritchie, as Receiver, etc., App’lt, v. Seaboard National Bank, Resp’t.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 66
Pages: 357–358

Head Matter:
Albert Ritchie, as Receiver, etc., App’lt, v. Seaboard National Bank, Resp’t.
(New York Common Pleas, General Term,
Filed April 1, 1895.)
Trial—Preferred cause.
A cause cannot tie preferred, under § 793 of the Code, where no notice of trial has been served.
Appeal from so much of an order as denied the motion for a preference of the cause.
William D. Tyndall, for app’lt; Herman Asron, for resp’t.

Opinion:
Bischoff, J.
The determination below that the plaintiff's motion for a preference should be denied is clearly to be supported. In order that the right to a preference under section 791 of the Code of Civil Procedure may be preserved and successfully invoked, it is essential that the party desiring the preference " serve upon the opposite party, with his notice of trial, a notice that an application will be made to the court at the opening thereof, tor leave to move the same as a preferred cause." Code Civ. Proc. § 793. In the present case, no notice of trial having ever been served, it results that the plaintiff's failure to comply with the' statutory requirements deprived him of the benefit sought to be availed of. Fox v. Quinn, 12 Supp. 725.
Order affirmed, with costs.