Case Name: John W. Barwell, Incorporated, complainant-appellant, v. C. Wallace Vail, receiver, &c., defendant-respondent
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1932-10-17
Citations: 111 N.J. Eq. 431
Docket Number: 
Parties: John W. Barwell, Incorporated, complainant-appellant, v. C. Wallace Vail, receiver, &c., defendant-respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 111
Pages: 431–431

Head Matter:
John W. Barwell, Incorporated, complainant-appellant, v. C. Wallace Vail, receiver, &c., defendant-respondent.
[Submitted May 27th, 1932.
Decided October 17th, 1932.]
Messrs. Pitney, Hardin & Skinner, for the appellant.
Mr. George B. Bailey, for the respondent.

Opinion:
Pee Cueiam.
The decree under review will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan.
For affirmance — The Chanoelloe, Teenchaed, Paekee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Beogan, Van Buskiek, Kays, Deae, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.