Case Name: BMAB EAST TOWER, INC., Appellant, v. TESTWELL CRAIG LABORATORIES AND CONSULTANTS, INC., et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2003-01-15
Citations: 835 So. 2d 1211
Docket Number: No. 3D02-1507
Parties: BMAB EAST TOWER, INC., Appellant, v. TESTWELL CRAIG LABORATORIES AND CONSULTANTS, INC., et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before GERSTEN, GREEN, and FLETCHER, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 835
Pages: 1211–1211

Head Matter:
BMAB EAST TOWER, INC., Appellant, v. TESTWELL CRAIG LABORATORIES AND CONSULTANTS, INC., et al., Appellees.
No. 3D02-1507.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan. 15, 2003.
Isicoff, Ragatz & Koenigsberg and Eric D. Isicoff, Miami, and Louis Perfetti Durante, for appellant.
Moore & Goodman and Bruce A. Goodman (Ft.Lauderdale), for appellees.
Before GERSTEN, GREEN, and FLETCHER, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
After reviewing the record, we conclude that appellant's amended complaint against appellees is not barred by the statute of limitations because it relates back to the date of filing of the fourth-party complaint. See McKee v. Fort Lauderdale Produce Co., 503 So.2d 412 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), rev. denied, 513 So.2d 1061 (Fla.1987); Gatins v. Sebastian Inlet Tax Dist., 453 So.2d 871 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.