Case Name: Helen M. BLOOD, Appellant, v. Ole A. PEARSON, H. L. Richards, and B. J. McGlynn, individually, Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1942-01-13
Citations: 124 F.2d 787
Docket Number: No. 12106
Parties: Helen M. BLOOD, Appellant, v. Ole A. PEARSON, H. L. Richards, and B. J. McGlynn, individually, Appellees.
Judges: Before GARDNER, SANBORN, and WOODROUGH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 124
Pages: 787–787

Head Matter:
Helen M. BLOOD, Appellant, v. Ole A. PEARSON, H. L. Richards, and B. J. McGlynn, individually, Appellees.
No. 12106.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Jan. 13, 1942.
Vance E. Skahen, of Minneapolis, Minn., for appellant.
Carsten L. Jacobson, Asst. City Atty., of Minneapolis, Minn., for appellee Ole A. Pearson.
Victor E. Anderson, U. S. Atty., of St. Paul, Minn. (Russell C. Rosenquest, Asst. U. S. Atty., of St. Paul, Minn., on the brief), for appellees H. L. Richards and B. J. McGlynn.
Before GARDNER, SANBORN, and WOODROUGH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
This is a companion case of Love v. Chandler et al., 124 F.2d 785, and was argued and submitted to this Court at the same time.
The complaint of the appellant, which was dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, was substantially similar to that considered in the Love case. Upon the authority of the decision of this Court in that case, which has been filed this day, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.