Case Name: Roy NATVIK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-02-28
Citations: 574 So. 2d 1230
Docket Number: No. 90-856
Parties: Roy NATVIK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: W. SHARP, J., concurs.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 574
Pages: 1230–1231

Head Matter:
Roy NATVIK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 90-856.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Feb. 28, 1991.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Paolo G. Annino, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Belle B. Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
GRIFFIN, Judge.
We affirm the lower court. However, in accordance with Flowers v. State, 567 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990), we certify to the supreme court the following question:
DO FLORIDA'S UNIFORM SENTENCING GUIDELINES REQUIRE THAT LEGAL CONSTRAINT POINTS BE ASSESSED FOR EACH OFFENSE COMMITTED WHILE UNDER LEGAL CONSTRAINT?
AFFIRMED.
W. SHARP, J., concurs.
COWART, J., dissents with opinion.