Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Terence Devon SCOTT, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-02-23
Citations: 467 F. App'x 230
Docket Number: No. 11-7685
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Terence Devon SCOTT, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 467
Pages: 230–231

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Terence Devon SCOTT, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 11-7685.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 16, 2012.
Decided: Feb. 23, 2012.
Terence Devon Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Craig Jon Jacobsen, I, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Terence Devon Scott appeals the district court's order denying his motion to reduce his sentence and its subsequent order denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Scott, No. 6:05-cr-00015-NKM-2 (W.D.Va. Nov. 17, 2011); 2011 WL 6257514 (Dec. 15, 2011) We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.