Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Shango BEY, a/k/a, Stanley Boyd, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-10-29
Citations: 91 S.W.3d 645
Docket Number: No. WD 60775
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Shango BEY, a/k/a, Stanley Boyd, Appellant.
Judges: Before JAMES M. SMART., JR., Presiding Judge, ROBERT G. ULRICH, Judge, and RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 91
Pages: 645–646

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Shango BEY, a/k/a, Stanley Boyd, Appellant.
No. WD 60775.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Oct. 29, 2002.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Dec. 24, 2002.
Ellen H. Flottman, State Public Defender Office, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Andrea Mazza Follett, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before JAMES M. SMART., JR., Presiding Judge, ROBERT G. ULRICH, Judge, and RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
Shango Bey appeals his conviction of committing violence to a correctional officer. RSMO 217.385. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).