Case Name: In the Matter of Jacob L., an Infant. Chasitiy P., Appellant; Administration for Children's Services, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2014-10-14
Citations: 121 A.D.3d 502
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Jacob L., an Infant. Chasitiy P., Appellant; Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent.
Judges: Concur — Tom, J.E, Sweeny, Renwick, Andrias and Clark, JJ.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 121
Pages: 502–502

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Jacob L., an Infant. Chasitiy P., Appellant; Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent.
[994 NYS2d 122]

Opinion:
Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Clark V Richardson, J.), entered on or about November 7, 2013, upon a fact-finding that appellant mother neglected the subject child, and order of fact-finding, same court and Judge, entered on or about October 2, 2013, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court properly determined that petitioner proved by a preponderance of the evidence that appellant had neglected the subject child by reason of her untreated mental condition and failure to provide adequate supervision and guardianship, which placed the child's physical, mental, and emotional condition at imminent risk of becoming impaired (see Matter of Immanuel C.-S. [Debra C.], 104 AD3d 615 [1st Dept 2013]). The hospital records and the expert witnesses' testimony indicate that the mother suffers from, among other things, psychosis, bipolar disorder and paranoia, as evidenced by her beliefs that she is a famous actress, and someone is hacking into her computer. The mother testified to multiple extended hospitalizations for mental illness, and the record demonstrated her lack of insight into her illness and repeated relapses due to her noncompliance with treatment and prescribed medication (see Matter of Naomi S. [Hadar S.], 87 AD3d 936 [1st Dept 2011], lv denied 18 NY3d 804 [2012]).
Eetitioner was not obligated to prove that the child suffered past or present harm, since the evidence demonstrated that he was at risk of harm based on demonstrable conduct by the mother (see Matter of Nassau County Dept. of Social Servs. v Denise J., 87 NY2d 73, 79 [1995]).
Concur — Tom, J.E, Sweeny, Renwick, Andrias and Clark, JJ.