Case Name: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, COMPLAINANT-RESPONDENT, v. ONEIDA MOTOR FREIGHT, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT; STATE OF NEW JERSEY, COMPLAINANT-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM H. MERRITT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1953-11-23
Citations: 28 N.J. Super. 329
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, COMPLAINANT-RESPONDENT, v. ONEIDA MOTOR FREIGHT, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, COMPLAINANT-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM H. MERRITT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 28
Pages: 329–329

Head Matter:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, COMPLAINANT-RESPONDENT, v. ONEIDA MOTOR FREIGHT, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, COMPLAINANT-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM H. MERRITT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued November 16, 1953
Decided November 23, 1953.
Before Judges Eastwood, Jayne and Fsancis.
Mr. Frank J. Gimino, Assistant County Prosecutor, argued the cause for the complainant-respondent (Mr. Frederick T. Law, County Prosecutor, attorney).
Mr. Reuben P. Goldstein argued the cause for the defendants-appellants.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Tenenbaum reported in 27 N. J. Super. 125 (Cty. Ct. 1953).