Case Name: Demetrius TRICE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-08-29
Citations: 25 S.W.3d 690
Docket Number: No. ED 77100
Parties: Demetrius TRICE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before: ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., P.J., MARY RHODES RUSSELL, J., and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 25
Pages: 690–691

Head Matter:
Demetrius TRICE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 77100.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Aug. 29, 2000.
Raymund J. Capelovitch, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Linda Lemke, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before: ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., P.J., MARY RHODES RUSSELL, J., and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Demetrius Trice (Movant) appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion without a hearing. We affirmed Movant's convictions for forcible rape, section 566.030, RSMo 1994, and armed criminal action, section 571.015, RSMo 1994, on direct appeal. State v. Trice, 976 S.W.2d 602 (Mo.App. E.D.1998). Movant now challenges the failure of his counsel to object to evidence of other crimes.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).