Case Name: Emile McFORD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2007-01-10
Citations: 948 So. 2d 60
Docket Number: No. 3D06-1181
Parties: Emile McFORD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before RAMIREZ, SUAREZ, and LAGOA, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 948
Pages: 60–61

Head Matter:
Emile McFORD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D06-1181.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan. 10, 2007.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 19, 2007.
Emile McFord, in proper person.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Robin F. Hazel, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before RAMIREZ, SUAREZ, and LAGOA, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Emile McFord appeals the trial court's summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. McFord's double-jeopardy claim is legally insufficient and conclusively refuted by the record before us. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850; Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D), Walls v. State, 926 So.2d 1156 (Fla.2006). In addition, McFord has already challenged his plea agreement violation and sentence on appeal and failed to raise the alleged double-jeopardy issue. See McFord v. State, 877 So.2d 874 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's order denying McFord's motion for post-conviction relief.
Affirmed.