Case Name: COLLECTOR OF REVENUE OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Missouri, et al, Respondent, v. Anthony and Beth DANIELE, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-06-26
Citations: 53 S.W.3d 211
Docket Number: No. ED 78952
Parties: COLLECTOR OF REVENUE OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Missouri, et al, Respondent, v. Anthony and Beth DANIELE, Appellant.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER, III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 53
Pages: 211–211

Head Matter:
COLLECTOR OF REVENUE OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Missouri, et al, Respondent, v. Anthony and Beth DANIELE, Appellant.
No. ED 78952.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
June 26, 2001.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 9, 2001.
Application for Transfer Denied Sept. 25, 2001.
Edward B. Nangle, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
William L. Sauerwein, Clayton, MO, Anthony J. Sestric, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER, III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Anthony and Beth Daniele and the St. Louis City Collector of Revenue appeal from the trial court's judgment granting Stanley and Gloria Gardocki's motion to set aside a sheriffs sale and relief from a default judgment in a land tax foreclosure suit. Stanley and Gloria Gardocki appeal the trial court's judgment ordering them to pay attorneys' fees and appraisal expenses.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcripts and find the trial court's decision was not an abuse of discretion. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).