Case Name: ALEXANDER O. ZAMBORY v. LOUIS CSIPO
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1925-03-24
Citations: 3 N.J. Misc. 322
Docket Number: 
Parties: ALEXANDER O. ZAMBORY v. LOUIS CSIPO.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 3
Pages: 322–322

Head Matter:
ALEXANDER O. ZAMBORY v. LOUIS CSIPO.
Decided March 24, 1925.
Before Justices Trenchard, Minturn and Lloyd.
Pot the petitioner, Thomas Brown.

Opinion:
Per Curiam. .
Our consideration of the alleged verbal inaccuracies contained in the opinion filed in tills cause, and alleged'as a basis for a rehearing, has not convinced us that there is anything of sufficient materiality or substance contained therein to change our views as expressed in the opinion upon the legal questions involved, as presented in the facts contained in the briefs.
Where nothing can be gained of benefit to the applicant, neither a new trial nor a rehearing will be awarded. Van Dyke v. Van Dyke, 17 N. J. L. 478.
The petition, therefore, will be denied.