Case Name: Marcelo MARTINEZ-CEDILLO, AKA Marcelo Martinez, Petitioner, v. William P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2019-05-16
Citations: 923 F.3d 1162
Docket Number: No. 14-71742
Parties: Marcelo MARTINEZ-CEDILLO, AKA Marcelo Martinez, Petitioner,
v.
William P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: THOMAS, Chief Circuit Judge
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 923
Pages: 1162–1162

Head Matter:
Marcelo MARTINEZ-CEDILLO, AKA Marcelo Martinez, Petitioner,
v.
William P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 14-71742
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
FILED MAY 16, 2019
David Belaire Landry, Esquire, Attorney, Law Office of David Landry, San Diego, CA, Eric F. Citron, Goldstein & Russell, P.C., Bethesda, MD, for Petitioner.
Samuel P. Go, Senior Litigation Counsel, Aimee J. Carmichael, Brianne Whelan Cohen, Trial Attorneys, OIL, DOJ - U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COUNSEL, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
David J. Zimmer, Goodwin Procter LLP, Boston, MA, for Amici Curiae IMMIGRANT DEFENSE PROJECT, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS, IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER, NATIONAL IMMIGRANT JUSTICE CENTER, NATIONAL IMMIGRATION PROJECT OF THE NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD.
Kari Elisabeth Hong, Attorney, Boston College Law School, Newton, Philip Torrey, Harvard Immigration and Refugee Clinical Program, Cambridge, MA, for Amicus Curiae IMMIGRATION LAW PROFESSORS, EXPERTS, AND CLINICIANS.
Agency No. AXXX-XX2-169
Before: THOMAS, Chief Circuit Judge
ORDER

Opinion:
The motion to dismiss this appeal as moot is GRANTED, and the order scheduling oral argument following the grant of rehearing en banc is VACATED. The three-judge panel disposition in this case, which was designated as non-precedential on March 13, 2019, is VACATED. The appeal is DISMISSED. Each party will bear its own costs. This order served on the agency shall constitute the mandate of this court.