Case Name: Isaac A. GATHINGS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2013-05-28
Citations: 399 S.W.3d 514
Docket Number: No. ED 98692
Parties: Isaac A. GATHINGS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr. P.J. and Roy L. Richter and Angela T. Quigless, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 399
Pages: 514–515

Head Matter:
Isaac A. GATHINGS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 98692.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
May 28, 2013.
Emmett D. Queener, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Todd T. Smith, Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr. P.J. and Roy L. Richter and Angela T. Quigless, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Isaac Gathings ("Movant") appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant argues the motion court clearly erred in denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief because his plea counsel was ineffective for assuring him that if he entered an open plea of guilty, he would receive probation.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).