Case Name: Robert L. PERKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald G. WATSON; Estate of Priscilla P. Watson, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-12-01
Citations: 155 F. App'x 714
Docket Number: No. 05-1789
Parties: Robert L. PERKINS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Donald G. WATSON; Estate of Priscilla P. Watson, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 155
Pages: 714–715

Head Matter:
Robert L. PERKINS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Donald G. WATSON; Estate of Priscilla P. Watson, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 05-1789.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 22, 2005.
Decided: Dec. 1, 2005.
Robert L. Perkins, Appellant Pro Se. Norman Barrett Smith, Smith, James, Rowlett & Cohen, L.L.P., Greensboro, North Carolina; Philip Edward Berger, the Berger Law Firm, Eden, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Robert L. Perkins appeals the magistrate judge's order granting Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Perkins v. Watson, No. CA-04-988-1-RAE (M.D.N.C. June 17, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).