Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Demont WAITES, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-11-21
Citations: 206 S.W.3d 378
Docket Number: No. ED 87289
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Demont WAITES, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 206
Pages: 378–379

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Demont WAITES, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 87289.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Nov. 21, 2006.
Nancy A. McKerrow, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, Stephanie Mor-rell, co-counsel, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Demont Waites appeals from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of one count of first-degree murder, three counts of first-degree assault, four counts of armed criminal action, and one count of second-degree robbery. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not err, plainly or otherwise, nor did it abuse its discretion. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).