Case Name: William Crooks, Appellant, v. Georgetown Transfer Company, Respondent
Court: Washington Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Washington
Decision Date: 1925-02-25
Citations: 133 Wash. 182
Docket Number: No. 18951
Parties: William Crooks, Appellant, v. Georgetown Transfer Company, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Washington Reports
Volume: 133
Pages: 182–183

Head Matter:
[No. 18951.
Department One.
February 25, 1925.]
William Crooks, Appellant, v. Georgetown Transfer Company, Respondent.
Appeal (11)—Nature and Grounds—Existence of Actual Controversy. No appeal lies from an order taxing costs.
Appeal from an order of the superior court for Pierce county, Clifford, J., entered August 25, 1924, taxing costs in favor of the defendant, in an action in tort.
Dismissed.
P. L. Pendleton and M. J. Gordon, for appellant.
Murphy & Kumm, for respondent.
Reported in 233 Pac. 1118.

Opinion:
Askren, J.
This is an appeal from an order of the trial court taxing costs in favor of the Georgetown Transfer Company, a corporation, in the second trial of an action the merits of which have been before this court on three different occasions, and are reported in 119 Wash. 154, 205 Pac. 419; 125 Wash. 563, 216 Pac. 869; and 130 Wash. 88, 226 Pac. 262.
At the outset we are met by a motion of respondent to dismiss the appeal. The motion must be granted.
We have held in a long line of decisions that this court will not take jurisdiction of a cause simply to determine who shall pay costs in the controversy. Smith v. Palmer, 38 Wash. 276, 80 Pac. 460; Wilson v. Fraser, 67 Wash. 347, 121 Pac. 829; White v. Stout, 72 Wash. 62, 121 Pac. 917; Vollman v. Industrial Workers of the World, 79 Wash. 192, 140 Pac. 337; Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. Hamilton, 80 Wash. 51, 141 Pac. 199; State v. Furth, 82 Wash. 665, 144 Pac. 907; Carstens & Earles v. Seattle, 84 Wash. 88, 146 Pac. 381, Ann. Cas. 1917A 1070; Standard Fire Ins. Co. v. Fishback, 86 Wash. 225, 145 Pac. 945; Holly-Mason Hardware Co. v. Schnatterly, 111 Wash. 29, 189 Pac. 545.
The appeal is therefore dismissed.
Tolman, C. J., Main, Bridges, and Parker, JJ., concur.