Case Name: Standard Film Service Company, Appellant, v. Alexander Film Corporation, Defendant, Impleaded with Stoll Film Co., Ltd., and Others, Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1925-05
Citations: 214 A.D. 701
Docket Number: 
Parties: Standard Film Service Company, Appellant, v. Alexander Film Corporation, Defendant, Impleaded with Stoll Film Co., Ltd., and Others, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 214
Pages: 701–702

Head Matter:
Standard Film Service Company, Appellant, v. Alexander Film Corporation, Defendant, Impleaded with Stoll Film Co., Ltd., and Others, Respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
The orders appealed from should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, without prejudice to an action at law for such damages as may have been sustained, on the authority of Black v. Vanderbilt (70 App. Div. 16); Perrin v. Smith (135 id. 127); Low v. Swartwout (171 id. 725) Gosselin Corp. v. Mario Tapparelli Fu Pietro of America, Inc. (191 id. 580; affd., 229 N. Y. 596), where the second question certified to the Court of Appeals was: " If the complaint herein does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action in equity, is the defendant entitled to judgment sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the complaint? " which the Court of Appeals answered in the affirmative. Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Finch, McAvoy and Martin, JJ. In each case': Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, without prejudice to an action at law for such damages as may have been sustained.