Case Name: Phillipsburg National Bank and Trust Company, complainant-respondent, v. William Y. Rush and Bertha A. Rush, his wife, and Ridgway & Pfeffer, Incorporated, defendants-appellants
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1936-01-31
Citations: 119 N.J. Eq. 387
Docket Number: 
Parties: Phillipsburg National Bank and Trust Company, complainant-respondent, v. William Y. Rush and Bertha A. Rush, his wife, and Ridgway & Pfeffer, Incorporated, defendants-appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 119
Pages: 387–390

Head Matter:
Phillipsburg National Bank and Trust Company, complainant-respondent, v. William Y. Rush and Bertha A. Rush, his wife, and Ridgway & Pfeffer, Incorporated, defendants-appellants.
[Argued October term, 1935.
Decided January 31st, 1936.]
Messrs. Wall, Haight, Carey & Hartpence, for the defendants-appellants William Y. Rush et ux.
Mr. Clarence Walters, for the complainant-respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
From an examination of the record in this case, we are satisfied that the conclusions of the vice-chancellor are supported by the proofs.
The decree appealed from is affirmed, with costs.
For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 12.
For reversal—None.