Case Name: BENJAMIN APPLESTEIN, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. UNITED BOARD AND CARTON CORPORATION, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND SAUL L. EPSTEIN AND INTERSTATE CONTAINER CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS; MARTHA U. BEUERLEIN, ETC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. UNITED BOARD & CARTON CORP., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND SAUL L. EPSTEIN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1960-06-13
Citations: 33 N.J. 72
Docket Number: 
Parties: BENJAMIN APPLESTEIN, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. UNITED BOARD AND CARTON CORPORATION, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND SAUL L. EPSTEIN AND INTERSTATE CONTAINER CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. MARTHA U. BEUERLEIN, ETC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. UNITED BOARD & CARTON CORP., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND SAUL L. EPSTEIN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 33
Pages: 72–73

Head Matter:
BENJAMIN APPLESTEIN, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. UNITED BOARD AND CARTON CORPORATION, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND SAUL L. EPSTEIN AND INTERSTATE CONTAINER CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. MARTHA U. BEUERLEIN, ETC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. UNITED BOARD & CARTON CORP., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND SAUL L. EPSTEIN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Argued June 6, 1960
Decided June 13, 1960.
Mr. Daniel O. Easen argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. Easen, Schnitzer & Easen, attorneys; Mr. Morris M. Schnitzer, of counsel).
Mr. David Friedenberg argued the cause for the respondents Francis X. Conway, et al. (Mr. Maurice O. Brigadier, attorney).
Mr. Philip J. Albert argued the cause for the respondent Benjamin Applestein (Messrs. Levy, Levy & Albert, attorneys) .
Mr. Isadore Olauberman argued the case for the respondent United Board & Carton Corporation (Mr. Sheldon A. Weiss, on the brief).
Mr. Raymond Ghasan argued the cause for the respondents Martha U. Beuerlein, et al. (Messrs. Levy, Lenicen & Margulies, attorneys; Mr. Seymour Margulies, of counsel).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons given in the opinion of Judge Kilkenny in the court below.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weinteaub, and Justices Burling, Jacobs, Erancis, Proctor, Hall and Schettino--7.
For reversal — None.