Case Name: Hans Homburger, Respondent, v. Lazar Levitin et al., Appellants, and Semyon Pomirchy, Respondent. (Action No. 1. ); Semyon Pomirchy, Respondent, v. Lazar Levitin et al., Appellants, and Hans Homburger, Respondent. (Action No. 2. )
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1987-02-02
Citations: 127 A.D.2d 565
Docket Number: 
Parties: Hans Homburger, Respondent, v Lazar Levitin et al., Appellants, and Semyon Pomirchy, Respondent. (Action No. 1. ) Semyon Pomirchy, Respondent, v Lazar Levitin et al., Appellants, and Hans Homburger, Respondent. (Action No. 2. )
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 127
Pages: 565–565

Head Matter:
Hans Homburger, Respondent, v Lazar Levitin et al., Appellants, and Semyon Pomirchy, Respondent. (Action No. 1. ) Semyon Pomirchy, Respondent, v Lazar Levitin et al., Appellants, and Hans Homburger, Respondent. (Action No. 2. )

Opinion:
In actions, inter alia, for the dissolution of a partnership, the defendants Lazar Levitin and Ocean Parkway Medical Building, a limited partnership, appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.), dated February 24, 1986, which denied their cross motion for a protective order.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs to the respondent Pomirchy, payable by the appellants.
Under the circumstances of this case, Special Term did not abuse its discretion in directing discovery and inspection of the items in question (see, Homburger v Levitin, 114 AD2d 885). Mangano, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Fiber, JJ., concur.