Case Name: IN RE: Tony Alforenzo WALKER, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-12-07
Citations: 706 F. App'x 109
Docket Number: No. 17-2001
Parties: IN RE: Tony Alforenzo WALKER, Petitioner.
Judges: Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 706
Pages: 109–110

Head Matter:
IN RE: Tony Alforenzo WALKER, Petitioner.
No. 17-2001
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: October 19, 2017
Decided: December 7, 2017
Tony Alforenzo Walker, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Tony Alforenzo Walker petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly' delayed in ruling on his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for relief from the court's judgment dismissing Walker's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion as untimely. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court's, docket reveals that the district court denied Walker's Rule 60(b) motion on October 16, 2017. United States v. Walker, No. 2:93-cr-00084-AWA-1 (E.D. Va. Oct. 16, 2017). Because the district court has recently decided Walker's motion, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED