Case Name: Raymon DENZMORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2016-04-19
Citations: 487 S.W.3d 493
Docket Number: No. ED 103048
Parties: Raymon DENZMORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Philip M. Hess, P.J,, Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J. and Angela T. Quigless, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 487
Pages: 493–494

Head Matter:
Raymon DENZMORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 103048
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Filed: April 19, 2016
Rosalyn Koch, Missouri Public Defender, Woodrail Centre, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, Missouri 65203, John K. Tucci, 720 Olive Street, Suite 1600, St. Louis, Missouri 63101, for Appellant.
Evan J. Buchheim, Assistant Attorney General, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102, for Respondent.
Before Philip M. Hess, P.J,, Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J. and Angela T. Quigless, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Raymon Denzmore (Movant) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an eviden-tiary hearing. On appeal, Movant claims the motion court clearly erred in denying his post-conviction motion because he proved that his trial counsel was ineffective. Specifically, Movant claims his trial counsel was ineffective for (1) failing to call Movant's brother to testify as an alibi witness, and (2) conceding Movant's guilt on two of his charged crimes. Finding no error, we affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and have determined that an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. Rule 30.25(b).