Case Name: In re Randolph Harris AUSTIN, a/k/a Randolph Harris, a/k/a Matarbus Raynard Fewell, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-12-23
Citations: 548 F. App'x 943
Docket Number: No. 13-2042
Parties: In re Randolph Harris AUSTIN, a/k/a Randolph Harris, a/k/a Matarbus Raynard Fewell, Petitioner.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 548
Pages: 943–943

Head Matter:
In re Randolph Harris AUSTIN, a/k/a Randolph Harris, a/k/a Matarbus Raynard Fewell, Petitioner.
No. 13-2042.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 17, 2013.
Decided: Dec. 23, 2013.
Randolph Harris Austin, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Randolph Harris Austin petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.