Case Name: George Walter CARLISLE, Jr., Appellant, v. ST. CHARLES COMMUNITY COLLEGE, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-02-01
Citations: 407 F. App'x 980
Docket Number: No. 10-2505
Parties: George Walter CARLISLE, Jr., Appellant, v. ST. CHARLES COMMUNITY COLLEGE, Appellee.
Judges: Before MELLOY, GRUENDER, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 407
Pages: 980–981

Head Matter:
George Walter CARLISLE, Jr., Appellant, v. ST. CHARLES COMMUNITY COLLEGE, Appellee.
No. 10-2505.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 21, 2011.
Filed: Feb. 1, 2011.
George Walter Carlisle, Jr., St. Louis, MO, pro se.
Michelle H. Basi, Celynda L. Brasher, Tueth & Keeney, St. Louis, MO, for Appellee.
Before MELLOY, GRUENDER, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
[UNPUBLISHED]
PER CURIAM.
George Carlisle, Jr., appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment in his employment discrimination action against St. Charles Community College. This court lacks jurisdiction to review the summary judgment order because this appeal is untimely as to the final judgment, and Carlisle's post-judgment motion for relief from judgment was not filed in time to toll the time to appeal. See Dill v. Gen. Am. Life Ins. Co., 525 F.3d 612, 619-20 (8th Cir.2008). This court finds no abuse of discretion in the district court's decision to deny the post-judgment motion. See Arnold, v. Wood, 238 F.3d 992, 998 (8th Cir.2001) (standard of review).
Accordingly, we affirm.
. The Honorable Donald J. Stohr, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.