Case Name: Mason Shoe Manufacturing Company, Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, v. Firstar Bank Eau Claire, NA, as Trustee of the Victor T. Mason Revocable Trust Dated October 1, 1993, and Bernice Mason, Defendants-Co-Appellants, Richard Mason and Thomas Mason, Defendants-Appellants; Bernice M. Mason, Plaintiff, Thomas J. Mason and Richard P. Mason, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. John A. Lubs, Jane M. Lubs, William M. Scobie, Rosemary M. Scobie, Robert J. Allen, Paul B. Mason, Jr., David E. Frasch and Mason Shoe Manufacturing Company, Defendants-Respondents-Petitioners; Firstar Bank Eau Claire NA, Estate of Victor T. Mason and Mason Revocable Grantor Trust, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Mason Shoe Manufacturing Company, John A. Lubs, Jane M. Lubs, William M. Scobie, Rosemary M. Scobie, Paul B. Mason, Jr. and David E. Frasch, Defendants-Respondents-Petitioners
Court: Wisconsin Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Wisconsin
Decision Date: 1999-06-29
Citations: 227 Wis. 2d 244
Docket Number: No. 97-2053
Parties: Mason Shoe Manufacturing Company, Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, v. Firstar Bank Eau Claire, NA, as Trustee of the Victor T. Mason Revocable Trust Dated October 1, 1993, and Bernice Mason, Defendants-Co-Appellants, Richard Mason and Thomas Mason, Defendants-Appellants. Bernice M. Mason, Plaintiff, Thomas J. Mason and Richard P. Mason, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. John A. Lubs, Jane M. Lubs, William M. Scobie, Rosemary M. Scobie, Robert J. Allen, Paul B. Mason, Jr., David E. Frasch and Mason Shoe Manufacturing Company, Defendants-Respondents-Petitioners. Firstar Bank Eau Claire NA, Estate of Victor T. Mason and Mason Revocable Grantor Trust, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Mason Shoe Manufacturing Company, John A. Lubs, Jane M. Lubs, William M. Scobie, Rosemary M. Scobie, Paul B. Mason, Jr. and David E. Frasch, Defendants-Respondents-Petitioners.
Judges: ¶ 2. JUSTICE JON P. WILCOX did not participate.
Reporter: Wisconsin Reports Second
Volume: 227
Pages: 244–248

Head Matter:
Mason Shoe Manufacturing Company, Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, v. Firstar Bank Eau Claire, NA, as Trustee of the Victor T. Mason Revocable Trust Dated October 1, 1993, and Bernice Mason, Defendants-Co-Appellants, Richard Mason and Thomas Mason, Defendants-Appellants. Bernice M. Mason, Plaintiff, Thomas J. Mason and Richard P. Mason, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. John A. Lubs, Jane M. Lubs, William M. Scobie, Rosemary M. Scobie, Robert J. Allen, Paul B. Mason, Jr., David E. Frasch and Mason Shoe Manufacturing Company, Defendants-Respondents-Petitioners. Firstar Bank Eau Claire NA, Estate of Victor T. Mason and Mason Revocable Grantor Trust, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Mason Shoe Manufacturing Company, John A. Lubs, Jane M. Lubs, William M. Scobie, Rosemary M. Scobie, Paul B. Mason, Jr. and David E. Frasch, Defendants-Respondents-Petitioners.
Supreme Court
No. 97-2053.
Filed June 29, 1999.
(Also reported in 596 N.W.2d 373.)
For the defendants-respondents-petitioners & plaintiff-respondent-petitioner there was a brief by Daniel W. Hildebrand and DeWitt, Ross & Stevens, S.C., Madison; Steven R. Cray and Wiley, Wahl, Colbert, Norseng, Cray & Herrell, S.C., Chippewa Falls; Eric J. Magnuson, William P. Wassweiler and Rider, Bennett, Egan & Arundel, L.L.P., Minneapolis, MN.
For the defendants-appellants & plaintiffs-appellants there was a brief by Richard W. Pitzner, Stephen L. Morgan and Murphy & Desmond, S.C., Madison.
For the defendants-co-appellants & plaintiff-appellants there were briefs by C. Vernon Howard, James F. Gebhart and Stroud, Stroud, Willink, Thompson & Howard, Madison.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
¶ 1. On May 18, 1998 this court granted a petition for review of a published court of appeals' decision, see Mason Shoe Mfg. Co. v. Firstar Bank Eau Claire, 217 Wis. 2d 715, 579 N.W.2d 789 (Ct. App. 1998), filed on behalf of Mason Shoe Manufacturing Company. The parties have filed a joint stipulation for dismissal and vacatur informing the court that they have reached an agreement disposing of all of the issues which were raised or might have been raised in the litigation. The parties ask this court to vacate the decisions of the court of appeals and the circuit court and remand the cases to the circuit court for entry of a judgment dismissing the cases with prejudice. The court concludes that, in this particular case, it is appropriate to honor the parties' request.
By the Court. — The decisions of the court of appeals and the circuit court are summarily vacated.
¶ 2. JUSTICE JON P. WILCOX did not participate.