Case Name: Thomas E. SHARP, Appellant, v. Luis E. BARRETO, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2012-07-18
Citations: 95 So. 3d 321
Docket Number: No. 3D11-1382
Parties: Thomas E. SHARP, Appellant, v. Luis E. BARRETO, Appellee.
Judges: Before SHEPHERD and FERNANDEZ, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 95
Pages: 321–322

Head Matter:
Thomas E. SHARP, Appellant, v. Luis E. BARRETO, Appellee.
No. 3D11-1382.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 18, 2012.
Rehearing Denied Aug. 28, 2012.
Shutts & Bowen and William Jay Palmer, for appellant.
Billbrough & Marks and G. Bart Billb-rough, for appellee.
Before SHEPHERD and FERNANDEZ, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See In re Estate of Paris, 699 So.2d 301 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997) (Stockman requirement is inapplicable to attorney's fee claims in probate proceeding); Levine v. Keaster, 862 So.2d 876 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (appellant must identify the particular allegedly erroneous items of challenged attorney's fees award).