Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TUNICA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants-Appellants, and The State of Mississippi et al., Defendants-Appellants; J. W. DRIVER et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. TUNICA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1971-03-23
Citations: 440 F.2d 377
Docket Number: No. 30580
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TUNICA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants-Appellants, and The State of Mississippi et al., Defendants-Appellants. J. W. DRIVER et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. TUNICA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 440
Pages: 377–378

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TUNICA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants-Appellants, and The State of Mississippi et al., Defendants-Appellants. J. W. DRIVER et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. TUNICA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants-Appellants.
No. 30580.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 23, 1971.
Rehearing Denied and Rehearing En Banc Denied April 19, 1971.
John W. Dulaney, Jr., Tunica, Miss., for Tunica.
William A. Allain, James Rankin, Asst. Attys. Gen. of Miss., A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. of Miss., Ed Davis Noble, Jr., Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen. of Miss., for the State.
H. M. Ray, U. S. Atty., Oxford, Miss., Ben Krage, Civil Rights Div., Jerris Leonard, Asst. Atty. Gen., Brian K. Landsberg, Atty., Hugh W. Fleischer, Daniel F. Rinzel, U. S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for United States.
Robert J. Kelly, Batesville, Miss., for J. W. Driver.
Before GEWIN, BELL, and ALDISERT , Circuit Judges.
Of the Third Circuit, setting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The opinion of the district court in this matter is reported. United States of America v. Tunica County School District, N.D. Miss., 1970, 323 F.Supp. 1019. We affirm for the reasons set forth therein. We note that the question and manner of recovering the salaries which were wrongfully paid to the resigning teachers will require further handling on the part of the district court. Our affirmance in no wise restricts the discretion of the district court in the matter of the recovery and as to the questions which will be attendant thereto.
Affirmed.