Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Emile HENRY, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-04-26
Citations: 165 S.W.3d 498
Docket Number: No. ED 84803
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Emile HENRY, Appellant.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 165
Pages: 498–499

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Emile HENRY, Appellant.
No. ED 84803.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
April 26, 2005.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied June 30, 2005.
Stephen Reynolds, Clayton, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Leslie E. McNamara, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Emile Henry ("defendant") appeals the judgment on his conviction of two counts of robbery in the first degree. Defendant claims that the trial court erred in allowing certain closing argument by the prosecutor, and in allowing evidence of defendant's uncharged misconduct.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).