Case Name: IN RE APPLICATION FOR PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BY DAN ROSS AS NEXT FRIEND ON BEHALF OF MICHAEL B. ROSS IN RE APPLICATION FOR PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BY THE OFFICE OF THE CHIEF PUBLIC DEFENDER AS NEXT FRIEND ON BEHALF OF MICHAEL B. ROSS
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 2005-01-25
Citations: 272 Conn. 674
Docket Number: SC 17342; SC 17343
Parties: IN RE APPLICATION FOR PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BY DAN ROSS AS NEXT FRIEND ON BEHALF OF MICHAEL B. ROSS IN RE APPLICATION FOR PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BY THE OFFICE OF THE CHIEF PUBLIC DEFENDER AS NEXT FRIEND ON BEHALF OF MICHAEL B. ROSS
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 272
Pages: 674–675

Head Matter:
IN RE APPLICATION FOR PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BY DAN ROSS AS NEXT FRIEND ON BEHALF OF MICHAEL B. ROSS IN RE APPLICATION FOR PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BY THE OFFICE OF THE CHIEF PUBLIC DEFENDER AS NEXT FRIEND ON BEHALF OF MICHAEL B. ROSS
(SC 17342) (SC 17343)
Sullivan, C. J., andNorcott, Vertefeuille, Zarella, Lavery, FotiandDranginis, Js.
Argued January 21
—officially released January 25, 2005
Jon L. Schoenhom, for the plaintiff in error (petitioner Dan Ross).
Temmy Ann Pieszak, chief of habeas corpus services, with whom was Adele V. Patterson, assistant public defender, for the plaintiff in error (petitioner office of the chief public defender).
Harry Weller, supervisory assistant state’s attorney, with whom were Kevin T. Kane, state’s attorney, and Michael O’Hare, supervisory assistant state’s attorney, and, on the brief, Robert J. Scheinblum, assistant state’s attorney, sand Jessica Probolus, special deputy assistant state’s attorney, for defendant in error (respondent commissioner of correction).
Edward J. Gavin filed a brief for the Connecticut Criminal Defense Lawyers Association as amicus curiae.
On January 25, 2005, this decision was released as a slip opinion.

Opinion:
Opinion
ZARELLA, J.
The motions for stay of execution filed by the plaintiffs in error are dismissed as moot. A full opinion will follow in due course.
In this opinion SULLIVAN, C. J., and VERTEFEUILLE and FOTI, Js., concurred.