Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Don D. NELSON, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-12-30
Citations: 130 S.W.3d 597
Docket Number: No. WD 61612
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Don D. NELSON, Appellant.
Judges: Before VICTOR C. HOWARD, P.J., HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, and JAMES M. SMART, JR., JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 130
Pages: 597–597

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Don D. NELSON, Appellant.
No. WD 61612.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Dec. 30, 2003.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 2, 2004.
Application for Transfer Denied April 27, 2004.
Craig Allan Johnston, State Public Defender, Columbia, for Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Karen L. Kramer, Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, for Respondent.
Before VICTOR C. HOWARD, P.J., HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, and JAMES M. SMART, JR., JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
A jury convicted Don Nelson of one count each of robbery, § 569.020, attempted robbery, § 564.011 and 569.020, and kidnapping, § 565.110, two counts of attempted forcible sodomy, § 564.011 and 566.060, and four counts of armed criminal action, § 571.015. The trial court sentenced him to seventy-eight years' imprisonment.
Nelson argues two points on appeal. First, he contends that the trial court's submission of both attempted sodomy counts to the jury constituted double jeopardy. Second, he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his kidnapping conviction.
Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).