Case Name: Michael KING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2016-03-29
Citations: 187 So. 3d 955
Docket Number: NO. 1D15-5039
Parties: Michael KING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: LEWIS and THOMAS, JJ., concur; MAKAR, J., concurring with opinion.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 187
Pages: 955–956

Head Matter:
Michael KING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
NO. 1D15-5039.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
March 29, 2016.
Michael King, pro se, Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appéllant challenges the denial of his postconviction motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). In his motion, Appellant argued that the trial court improperly authorized the Department of Corrections ("DOC") to determine whether his gain-time should be forfeited after he was found in violation of his probation. He alleged that despite the fact that DOC did not have the authority to forfeit his gain-time based upon the date of his offense, it was nonetheless forfeited. The trial court summarily denied the mo-tion. We hereby, affirm, as this-claim is not cognizable pursuant to rule 3.800(a). See Dep't of Corrections v. Mattress, 686 So.2d 740, 741 (Fla. 6th DCA 1997).
AFFIRMED.
LEWIS and THOMAS, JJ., concur; MAKAR, J., concurring with opinion.