Case Name: Barbara Lindsey CURRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THOMAS BUILT BUS INC., Defendant-Appellee, and Adam Steifer; Matthew Flatlow; Vanessa, Paralegal; Equal Employment Opportunity Commission; Industrial Commission; Dr. Michaux Kilapatrick; North Carolina Department of Commerce, Division of Employment Security Adjudication Unit, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-07-31
Citations: 694 F. App'x 134
Docket Number: No. 17-1296
Parties: Barbara Lindsey CURRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THOMAS BUILT BUS INC., Defendant-Appellee, and Adam Steifer; Matthew Flatlow; Vanessa, Paralegal; Equal Employment Opportunity Commission; Industrial Commission; Dr. Michaux Kilapatrick; North Carolina Department of Commerce, Division of Employment Security Adjudication Unit, Defendants.
Judges: Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 694
Pages: 134–135

Head Matter:
Barbara Lindsey CURRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THOMAS BUILT BUS INC., Defendant-Appellee, and Adam Steifer; Matthew Flatlow; Vanessa, Paralegal; Equal Employment Opportunity Commission; Industrial Commission; Dr. Michaux Kilapatrick; North Carolina Department of Commerce, Division of Employment Security Adjudication Unit, Defendants.
No. 17-1296
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 27, 2017
Decided: July 31, 2017
Barbara Lindsey Curry, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Allen Bright, OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Greenville, South Carolina; Brodie Davis Erwin, Kevin Scott Joyner, OGLE-' TREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Barbara Lindsey Curry appeals the district court's order granting Defendant's motion for summary judgment in this civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Curry v. Thomas Built Bus Inc., No. 1:15-cv-00992-CCE-LPA (M.D.N.C. Mar. 3, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
To the extent that Curry seeks to raise new claims on appeal related to her resignation settlement or workers compensation, she fails to demonstrate that exceptional circumstances warrant consideration of those claims. See Pomomo v. United States, 814 F.3d 681, 686 (4th Cir. 2016) ("Absent exceptional circumstances we do not consider issues raised for the first time on appeal." (ellipsis omitted)).