Case Name: Franklin W. NOOE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2006-05-04
Citations: 930 So. 2d 579
Docket Number: No. SC05-514
Parties: Franklin W. NOOE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: PARIENTE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 930
Pages: 579–580

Head Matter:
Franklin W. NOOE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. SC05-514.
Supreme Court of Florida.
May 4, 2006.
Michael H. Lambert, Daytona Beach, FL, for Petitioner.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, FL, Barbara C. Davis, Douglas T. Squire, and Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorneys General, Daytona Beach, FL, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We originally accepted jurisdiction to review Nooe v. State, 892 So.2d 1135 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005), pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution. Upon further consideration, we have determined that jurisdiction was improvidently granted because State v. Diaz, 814 So.2d 466 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002), was decided on the issue of the statute of limitations pursuant to section 812.035(10), Florida Statutes (1995), and the present case was decided on the basis of the aggregation provision in section 812.012(9)(c), Florida Statutes (2001). Accordingly, express and direct conflict does not exist, and this review proceeding is hereby dismissed.
It is so ordered.
PARIENTE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.
LEWIS, J., dissents.
. This provision was renumbered to be section 812.012(10)(c) in 2005.