Case Name: IN the INTEREST OF: M.M.L., A Minor
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2016-08-30
Citations: 497 S.W.3d 353
Docket Number: No. ED 103963
Parties: IN the INTEREST OF: M.M.L., A Minor.
Judges: Before James M. Dowd, P.J., Kurt S. Odenwald, J., and Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 497
Pages: 353–354

Head Matter:
IN the INTEREST OF: M.M.L., A Minor.
No. ED 103963
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District. Division Four.
Filed: August 30, 2016
Christopher M. Braeske, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Chimene Y. Laskley, Atty. for Juvenile Officer, Clayton, MO, Crista L. Chenow-eth-Beracha, Guardian Ad Litem, Brent-wood, MO, Richard J. Childress, Atty. for MO Dept, of Soc. Serv., St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.
Before James M. Dowd, P.J., Kurt S. Odenwald, J., and Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
J.N.L. ("Mother") appeals the juvenile court's judgment terminating her parental rights to her son, M.M.L. ("Child"). Mother raises two points on appeal: 1) there was insufficient evidence to support the juvenile court's finding that Mother neglected Child; and 2) there was insufficient evidence to support the juvenile court's finding that termination of Mother's parental rights was in the best interest of Child. Finding that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, we affirm.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for then-information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).