Case Name: Herman Eugene JONES, Plaintiff in Error, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Defendant in Error
Court: Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1969-10-01
Citations: 461 P.2d 975
Docket Number: No. A-15566
Parties: Herman Eugene JONES, Plaintiff in Error, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Defendant in Error.
Judges: BRETT, P. J., and BUSSEY, J., concur.
Reporter: Pacific Reporter 2d
Volume: 461
Pages: 975–975

Head Matter:
Herman Eugene JONES, Plaintiff in Error, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Defendant in Error.
No. A-15566.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.
Oct. 1, 1969.
Herman Eugene Jones, pro se.
Joseph Humphrey, Dist. Atty., Stephens County, for respondent.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
NIX, Judge.
We have carefully reviewed the petition filed in this cause, and find that Humphries v. State (Dist. Ct. of Garvin County), Okl. Cr., 416 P.2d 169, is decisive herein, where it was stated:
"Where the record affirmatively shows that an accused knew and understood his right to counsel and competently and intelligently waived this right and entered a plea of guilty, with full knowledge of the consequences of such plea, the requirements of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States making obligatory the provisions of the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States upon the states have been fully complied with and application for Habeas Corpus will be denied."
In the instant case, the record completely negates the claim of petitioner, and it is apparent that he was denied none of his constitutional rights. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is, accordingly, denied.
BRETT, P. J., and BUSSEY, J., concur.