Case Name: John PFINGSTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-07-06
Citations: 995 S.W.2d 526
Docket Number: No. 74992
Parties: John PFINGSTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., C.J., JAMES A. PUDLOWSKI, J. and KENT E. KAROHL, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 995
Pages: 526–526

Head Matter:
John PFINGSTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 74992.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
July 6, 1999.
Jennifer S. Walsh, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Shaun J. Mackelprang, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., C.J., JAMES A. PUDLOWSKI, J. and KENT E. KAROHL, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
John Pfingston (Movant) files this appeal contesting the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. Movant pled guilty to first degree robbery in violation of section 569.020, RSMo 1994. We have reviewed the -briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).