Case Name: THOR GUARD, INC. a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. CITY OF BOCA RATON, Julio Electric Corporation, a Florida corporation, and Angel Villanueva, Sr., as Personal Representative of the Estate of Angel Villanueva, Jr., deceased, and on behalf of all known beneficiaries, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2012-11-28
Citations: 100 So. 3d 1285
Docket Number: No. 4D11-2339
Parties: THOR GUARD, INC. a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. CITY OF BOCA RATON, Julio Electric Corporation, a Florida corporation, and Angel Villanueva, Sr., as Personal Representative of the Estate of Angel Villanueva, Jr., deceased, and on behalf of all known beneficiaries, Appellees.
Judges: MAY, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and GERBER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 100
Pages: 1285–1285

Head Matter:
THOR GUARD, INC. a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. CITY OF BOCA RATON, Julio Electric Corporation, a Florida corporation, and Angel Villanueva, Sr., as Personal Representative of the Estate of Angel Villanueva, Jr., deceased, and on behalf of all known beneficiaries, Appellees.
No. 4D11-2339.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Nov. 28, 2012.
Thomas E. Tookey of T.E. Tookey, P.A., for appellant.
Edward G. Guedes and Matthew H. Mandel of Weiss Serota Helfman Pastoriza Cole & Boniske, P.L., Coral Gables, for appellee City of Boca Raton.
Shannon P. McKenna of Conroy, Sim-berg, Ganon, Krevans, Abel, Lurvey, Morrow, & Schefer, P.A., Hollywood, for appel-lee Julio Electric Corporation.
Liah C. Catanese of Alan Goldfarb, P.A, Miami, for appellee Angel Villanueva, Sr., as Personal Representative of the Estate of Angel Villanueva, Jr., and on behalf of all known beneficiaries.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm without discussion the defendant supplier's appeal of the final summary judgment in the co-defendant City's favor. We have no jurisdiction to consider the denial of the supplier's motion for summary judgment based on the same arguments which the City raised in its motion for summary judgment; therefore, we cannot address the merits of the supplier's claim at this time. See Am. Nat'l Title & Escrow of Fla., Inc. v. Guarantee Title & Trust Co., 748 So.2d 1054, 1056 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) ("We have no jurisdiction of orders denying motions for summary judgment and therefore cannot address the merits of their claim.").
Affirmed.
MAY, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and GERBER, JJ., concur.