Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Louis JONES, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-05-08
Citations: 225 F. App'x 197
Docket Number: No. 06-8061
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. James Louis JONES, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 225
Pages: 197–197

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. James Louis JONES, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 06-8061.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 11, 2007.
Decided: May 8, 2007.
James Louis Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Erik Russell Barnett, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
James Louis Jones appeals the district court's order denying his motion for modification of his sentence. On appeal, Jones abandons the claims raised below and asserts only grounds not presented to the district court. Claims raised initially on appeal are not entitled to appellate review. Muth v. United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir.1993). Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.