Case Name: State, Plaintiff, vs. Farber and others, Defendants
Court: Wisconsin Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Wisconsin
Decision Date: 1927-12-09
Citations: 194 Wis. 455
Docket Number: 
Parties: State, Plaintiff, vs. Farber and others, Defendants.
Judges: Eschweiler and Crownhart, JJ., dissent.
Reporter: Wisconsin Reports
Volume: 194
Pages: 455–455

Head Matter:
State, Plaintiff, vs. Farber and others, Defendants.
November 12
December 9, 1927.
For the plaintiff there was a brief by Frank B. Keefe, district attorney of Winnebago county, the Attorney General, and J. E. Messerschmidi, assistant attorney general, and oral argument by Mr. Keefe and Mr. Messer schmidi.
For the defendants there was a brief by Reilly & O’Brien of Fond du Lac, and oral argument by /. E. O’Brien.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This is a companion case to State v. Van Brocklin, ante, p. 441, 217 N. W. 277. The defendants were convicted of violations of the prohibition law, and the trial court certified to this court a question substantially similar to that certified and considered in State v. Van Brocklin. That case is decisive of this, and the question is answered in the affirmative.
Eschweiler and Crownhart, JJ., dissent.