Case Name: Natalie JOHNSON-LEE; Dean Zimmerman; Eric Makela; Shane Price; Tom Taylor; Lisa Crockett; Travis Lee; Pauline Thomas; Lani Hogan; Stephen Goodell; Brady Baker; Steven Wash; Ken Bradley; Cam Gordon, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS, Defendants/Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-03-03
Citations: 170 F. App'x 15
Docket Number: No. 04-4203
Parties: Natalie JOHNSON-LEE; Dean Zimmerman; Eric Makela; Shane Price; Tom Taylor; Lisa Crockett; Travis Lee; Pauline Thomas; Lani Hogan; Stephen Goodell; Brady Baker; Steven Wash; Ken Bradley; Cam Gordon, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS, Defendants/Appellee.
Judges: Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, WOLLMAN, and BYE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 170
Pages: 15–16

Head Matter:
Natalie JOHNSON-LEE; Dean Zimmerman; Eric Makela; Shane Price; Tom Taylor; Lisa Crockett; Travis Lee; Pauline Thomas; Lani Hogan; Stephen Goodell; Brady Baker; Steven Wash; Ken Bradley; Cam Gordon, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS, Defendants/Appellee.
No. 04-4203.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 12, 2005.
Decided: March 3, 2006.
Larry B. Leventhal, Randall Morris, David L. Garelick, Leventhal & Associates, Michael C. Hager, Minneapolis, MN, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
Clifford M. Greene, Kevin G. Ross, Pamela Lee Vanderwiel, Greene & Espel, Minneapolis, MN, for Defendants-Appellee.
Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, WOLLMAN, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiffs appeal the district court's grant of summary judgment dismissing their claims against the City of Minneapolis alleging its Redistricting Commission's Redistricting Plan violated various provisions of Minneapolis's City Charter as well as Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (42 U.S.C. § 1973-1973p); 42 U.S.C. § 1983; and the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. Having reviewed the record and the parties' submissions de novo, Lerohl v. Friends of Minn. Sinfonia, 322 F.3d 486, 488 (8th Cir.2003), we conclude an extensive discussion is not warranted. The district court has provided a comprehensive and well-reasoned opinion addressing the issues raised by the parties, and we have nothing to add to the analysis. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court for the reason's stated in its memorandum opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.