Case Name: MASON v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1937-10-13
Citations: 110 S.W.2d 1153
Docket Number: No. 18911
Parties: MASON v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 110
Pages: 1153–1154

Head Matter:
MASON v. STATE.
No. 18911.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Oct. 13, 1937.
Rehearing Denied Dec. 15, 1937.
S.am J. Hamilton, of Memphis, and Ma-han & Broughton, of Childress, for appellant. .
Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
LATTIMORE, Judge.
Conviction for violating the Liquor Control Act (Vernon's Ann.P.C. art. 666 — 1 et seq.); punishment, a fine of $350 and three months' confinement in the county jail.
We are of opinion that the statement in the complaint of the fact that the commissioners' court made its order prohibiting the sale of intoxicating liquor in Hall county, after canvassing the vote of the citizens of said county in a local option election held in September 191 J, is a sufficient statement of the fact that the result of said election was to prohibit such sale.'
The other questions raised on this appeal were disposed of in our opinion in the case of Baker v. State, 106 S.W.2d 308, followed and approved by Parker v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 106 S.W.2d 313, and Morris v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 106 S.W.2d 314.
The other complaint of the refusal of' the court to submit to the jury the question as to whether certain state witnesses were accomplices is disposed of adversely to appellant's contention in an opinion in Stevens v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 110 S.W.2d 906, this day handed down.
Finding no error in the record, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.