Case Name: In the Matter of Charles Shattenkirk et al., Appellants, v. Michael Finnerty, as Budget Director of the State of New York, et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1984-06-29
Citations: 62 N.Y.2d 949
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Charles Shattenkirk et al., Appellants, v Michael Finnerty, as Budget Director of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.
Judges: Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 62
Pages: 949–951

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Charles Shattenkirk et al., Appellants, v Michael Finnerty, as Budget Director of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.
Argued June 7, 1984;
decided June 29, 1984
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Bartley J. Costello, III, John J. Ciavardoni and William F. Sheehan for appellants.
Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Peter H. Schiff and Alan W. Rubenstein of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the opinion by Presiding Justice A. Franklin Mahoney at the Appellate Division (97 AD2d 51).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.