Case Name: SOUTH CAROLINA STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT v. ISTHMIAN S. S. CO.
Court: Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jurisdiction: South Carolina
Decision Date: 1947-06-06
Citations: 210 S.C. 422
Docket Number: 15956
Parties: SOUTH CAROLINA STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT v. ISTHMIAN S. S. CO.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Carolina Reports
Volume: 210
Pages: 422–423

Head Matter:
15956
SOUTH CAROLINA STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT v. ISTHMIAN S. S. CO.
(43 S. E. (2d) 138)
Messrs. Moore & Mouson, of Charleston, for Appellant, cite:
Mr. John M. Daniel, Attorney General, of Columbia, and Messrs. Huger Sinkler and Augustine T. Smythe, of Charleston, for Respondent, cite:
June 6, 1947.
Messrs. Moore & Mouson, of Charleston, in Reply, for Appellant, cite:

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Judgment upon the appeal of The South Carolina State Highway Department, plaintiff in this action, against Isthmian Steamship Company, defendant, and respondent in that appeal but appellant here, was filed this day. 43 S. E. (2d) 132. It holds that the Company waived its objections to the jurisdiction of the Court of Common Pleas for Charleston County. That court finally overruled such objections and the Company, defendant below, excepted and seeks review of that action in this appeal. But whether there was error has become a moot question by reason of the result of the prior appeal. Under these circumstances the appeal is dismissed. 3 Am. Jur. 308 et seq., Appeal and Error, Sec. 733; 4 C. J. S., Appeal and Error, Sec. 1362, p. 1967 et seq.) Wallingford & Russell v. Benson, 17 S. C. 591; Cantwell v. Williams, 35 S. C. 602,44 S. E.. 549; Burgess v. Crumpton, 93 S. C. 562, 77 S. E. 356; Page v. Page, 167 N. C. 350, 83 S. E. 627.