Case Name: Dorothy C. ELLIOTT, Individually and as Co-Personal Representative of the Estate of Archie Elliott, III; Archie Elliott, Jr., Individually and as Co-Personal Representative of the Estate of Archie Elliott, III, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Jason LEAVITT, Police Officer for District Heights, MD, Defendant-Appellant, and Prince George'S County, Maryland; David B. Mitchell, Prince George's County Police Chief; Wayne Cheney, Police Officer; City Of District Heights, MD; Michael Conboy, Police Chief for District Heights, MD, Defendants; Dorothy C. ELLIOTT, Individually and as Co-Personal Representative of the Estate of Archie Elliott, III; Archie Elliott, Jr., Individually and as Co-Personal Representative of the Estate of Archie Elliott, III, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Wayne CHENEY, Police Officer, Defendant-Appellant, and Jason Leavitt, Police Officer for District Heights, MD; Prince George's County, Maryland; David B. Mitchell, Prince George's County Police Chief; City of District Heights, MD; Michael Conboy, Police Chief for District Heights, MD, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1997-01-24
Citations: 105 F.3d 174
Docket Number: Nos. 96-1150, 96-1151
Parties: Dorothy C. ELLIOTT, Individually and as Co-Personal Representative of the Estate of Archie Elliott, III; Archie Elliott, Jr., Individually and as Co-Personal Representative of the Estate of Archie Elliott, III, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Jason LEAVITT, Police Officer for District Heights, MD, Defendant-Appellant, and Prince George'S County, Maryland; David B. Mitchell, Prince George's County Police Chief; Wayne Cheney, Police Officer; City Of District Heights, MD; Michael Conboy, Police Chief for District Heights, MD, Defendants. Dorothy C. ELLIOTT, Individually and as Co-Personal Representative of the Estate of Archie Elliott, III; Archie Elliott, Jr., Individually and as Co-Personal Representative of the Estate of Archie Elliott, III, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Wayne CHENEY, Police Officer, Defendant-Appellant, and Jason Leavitt, Police Officer for District Heights, MD; Prince George's County, Maryland; David B. Mitchell, Prince George's County Police Chief; City of District Heights, MD; Michael Conboy, Police Chief for District Heights, MD, Defendants.
Judges: Judge K.K. HALL, Judge MURNAGHAN, Judge ERVIN, and Judge MICHAEL join in this dissent.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 105
Pages: 174–184

Head Matter:
Dorothy C. ELLIOTT, Individually and as Co-Personal Representative of the Estate of Archie Elliott, III; Archie Elliott, Jr., Individually and as Co-Personal Representative of the Estate of Archie Elliott, III, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Jason LEAVITT, Police Officer for District Heights, MD, Defendant-Appellant, and Prince George'S County, Maryland; David B. Mitchell, Prince George's County Police Chief; Wayne Cheney, Police Officer; City Of District Heights, MD; Michael Conboy, Police Chief for District Heights, MD, Defendants. Dorothy C. ELLIOTT, Individually and as Co-Personal Representative of the Estate of Archie Elliott, III; Archie Elliott, Jr., Individually and as Co-Personal Representative of the Estate of Archie Elliott, III, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Wayne CHENEY, Police Officer, Defendant-Appellant, and Jason Leavitt, Police Officer for District Heights, MD; Prince George's County, Maryland; David B. Mitchell, Prince George's County Police Chief; City of District Heights, MD; Michael Conboy, Police Chief for District Heights, MD, Defendants.
Nos. 96-1150, 96-1151.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Jan. 24, 1997.

Opinion:
ORDER
A member of the Court requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard en bane. A majority of the judges in active service voted that it should not be reheard en banc.
Judges Hall, Murnaghan, Ervin, Michael, and Motz voted for rehearing en banc. Chief Judge Wilkinson, and Judges Russell, Widener, Wilkins, Niemeyer, Hamilton, Luttig, and Williams voted against rehearing en banc.
Chief Judge Wilkinson filed an opinion concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc, in which Judges Russell, Widener, Wilkins, Niemeyer, Luttig, and Williams joined. Judge Motz filed an opinion dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc, in which Judges Hall, Murnaghan, Ervin, and Michael joined.
The suggestion for rehearing en banc is hereby denied. Entered at the direction of Chief Judge Wilkinson for the Court.