Case Name: Wilbert Wesley LEWIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. W.G. BOUCHER, personally and in his official capacity as a Police Officer for the City of Roanoke, Defendant Appellee, and City of Roanoke; Atlas Gaskins, personally and in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the City of Roanoke, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-09-08
Citations: 73 F. App'x 648
Docket Number: No. 02-2466
Parties: Wilbert Wesley LEWIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. W.G. BOUCHER, personally and in his official capacity as a Police Officer for the City of Roanoke, Defendant Appellee, and City of Roanoke; Atlas Gaskins, personally and in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the City of Roanoke, Defendants.
Judges: Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 73
Pages: 648–648

Head Matter:
Wilbert Wesley LEWIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. W.G. BOUCHER, personally and in his official capacity as a Police Officer for the City of Roanoke, Defendant Appellee, and City of Roanoke; Atlas Gaskins, personally and in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the City of Roanoke, Defendants.
No. 02-2466.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 22, 2003.
Decided Sept. 8, 2003.
Wilbert Wesley Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Kay Dillon, City Attorney’s Office, Roanoke, Virginia; Jim Harold Guynn, Jr., Guynn & Memmer, P.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Wilbert Wesley Lewis appeals the district court's order denying relief in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action, pursuant to the jury's verdict. Lewis has not provided a transcript, and he fails to establish a basis to have a transcript prepared at government expense. 28 U.S.C. § 753(f) (2000). We have reviewed the existing record and find no basis for appellate relief. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. See Lewis v. Boucher, No. CA-00-566-7 (WD.Va. Nov. 27, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.