Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Eddie WILLIAMS, Appellant; Eddie WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1997-04-15
Citations: 943 S.W.2d 831
Docket Number: Nos. 68019, 70461
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Eddie WILLIAMS, Appellant. Eddie WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before RHODES RUSSELL, P.J., and SIMON and KAROHL, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 943
Pages: 831–832

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Eddie WILLIAMS, Appellant. Eddie WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 68019, 70461.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
April 15, 1997.
Deborah B. Wafer, District Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Becky Owenson Kilpatrick, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before RHODES RUSSELL, P.J., and SIMON and KAROHL, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Eddie Williams appeals from his conviction of two counts of second degree assault in violation of § 565.060, RSMo 1994, and two counts of armed criminal action in violation of § 571.015, RSMo 1994. Defendant also appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing.
The judgments of the trial court and motion court are affirmed. Rule 84.16(b) and 30.25(b). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our holdings.