Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James CABACCANG, Defendant-Appellant; United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard T. Cabaccang, Defendant-Appellant; United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roy Toves Cabaccang, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-11-06
Citations: 309 F.3d 1209
Docket Number: Nos. 98-10159, 98-10195 and 98-10203
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James CABACCANG, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard T. Cabaccang, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roy Toves Cabaccang, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 309
Pages: 1209–1210

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James CABACCANG, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard T. Cabaccang, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roy Toves Cabaccang, Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 98-10159, 98-10195 and 98-10203.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Nov. 6, 2002.
Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.The three-judge panel memorandum disposition shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.