Case Name: CROFOTT, NIELSEN & CO. v. McKINNEY et al.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1945-03-15
Citations: 148 F.2d 371
Docket Number: No. 10868
Parties: CROFOTT, NIELSEN & CO. v. McKINNEY et al.
Judges: Before DENMAN, STEPHENS, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 148
Pages: 371–372

Head Matter:
CROFOTT, NIELSEN & CO. v. McKINNEY et al.
No. 10868.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
March 15, 1945.
Harold W. Mattingly, of Los Angeles, Cal., and Joshua R. H. Potts and Eugene Vincent Clarke, both of Chicago, 111., for appellant.
Avery M. Blount and Betty B. Gillette, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees.
Before DENMAN, STEPHENS, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant contends that the evidence of the use of appellant's patent as substantially against the public interest does not support the finding to that effect. We do not agree.
The judgment appealed from is affirmed.