Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Justin MARSHALL, a/k/a WJ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-10-21
Citations: 670 F. App'x 76
Docket Number: No. 16-6882
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Justin MARSHALL, a/k/a WJ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 670
Pages: 76–76

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Justin MARSHALL, a/k/a WJ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-6882
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: October 18, 2016
Decided: October 21, 2016
William Justin Marshall, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Barrett Taylor, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina; Leesa Washington, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
William Justin Marshall appeals the district court's order dismissing his pro se 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Marshall, No. 3:06-cr-00562-CMC-1 (D.S.C. June 14, 2016).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not' aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED