Case Name: McCALL v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1929-01-16
Citations: 18 S.W.2d 172
Docket Number: No. 12134
Parties: McCALL v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 18
Pages: 172–176

Head Matter:
McCALL v. STATE.
(No. 12134.)
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Jan. 16, 1929.
Rehearing Denied May 22, 1929.
On Application for Leave to File Second Motion for Rehearing June 26, 1929.
P. G. Vaughn, of Beaumont, for appellant.
A. A. Dawson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State..

Opinion:
LATTIMORE, J.
Conviction for aggravated assault; punishment, a fine of $500 and 12 months in the county jail.
It is to be regretted that this record is in such shape that we .cannot consider the statement of facts and hills of exception. The appellant's motion for new trial was overruled on April 28, 1928, on which date notice of appeal was given. The trial court on that date made an order granting to appellant 90 days from the adjournment of the court in which to file statement of facts and bills of exception. The court adjourned on May 26, 1928. The statement of facts and hills of exception were filed herein on August 8, 1928. This was too late.
Trial courts are without power to grant longer than 90 days from the day of the overruling of appellant's motion for new trial and the giving of notice of appeal, in which to file statement of facts and bills of exception. Article 760, Vernon's C. C. P. 1925; Brown v. State, 104 Tex. Cr. R. 479, 284 S. W. 586; Balo v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 9 S.W. (2d) 737; Picarino v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 8 S.W. (2d) 142.
Appellant was indicted for assault to murder and upon trial given the punishment above stated. The indictment appears to be in conformity with law, and is followed by the charge of the court, the verdict, and judgment.
No error appearing, the judgment will be affirmed.