Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David ZEBROWSKI, a/k/a Dog, David Stewart, a/k/a Lewis Brady, a/k/a Mad Dog, a/k/a Eric Conrad Smith, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-05-29
Citations: 521 F. App'x 271
Docket Number: No. 13-6257
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David ZEBROWSKI, a/k/a Dog, David Stewart, a/k/a Lewis Brady, a/k/a Mad Dog, a/k/a Eric Conrad Smith, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 521
Pages: 271–271

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David ZEBROWSKI, a/k/a Dog, David Stewart, a/k/a Lewis Brady, a/k/a Mad Dog, a/k/a Eric Conrad Smith, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-6257.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 23, 2013.
Decided: May 29, 2013.
David Zebrowski, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Daniel Cooke, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
David Zebrowski appeals the district court's order denying his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(5) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Zebrowski, No. 3:96-er-00041-JRS-3 (E.D.Va. Jan. 16, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.