Case Name: BRIDGES v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1915-03-03
Citations: 174 S.W. 1048
Docket Number: No. 3453
Parties: BRIDGES v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 174
Pages: 1048–1048

Head Matter:
BRIDGES v. STATE.
(No. 3453.)
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
March 3, 1915.)
4-Ppeal from San Augustine County Court; Wm. McDonald, Special Judge.
E. D. Bridges was convicted of selling liquor in a prohibition county, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
C. C. McDonald, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the-State.

Opinion:
HARPER, J.
Appellant was convicted of making a sale of liquor in a prohibition county, and his punishment assessed at 20 days' imprisonment in the county jail and a fine of $100.
There are no bills of exception in the record. No special charges were requested, and there is no complaint of the charge of the court as given. So the only thing we can consider is, Will the testimony sustain the verdict? If the jury believed the testimony of Zack Alvis, and it appears they did, it clearly showed a sale of whisky by appellant to Alvis.
The judgment is therefore affirmed.