Case Name: Theresa Sgarlata, Respondent, v. City of Schenectady, Appellant. (Action No. 1.); Theresa Sgarlata, Respondent, v. City of Schenectady, Appellant. (Action No. 2.)
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1937-03-03
Citations: 250 A.D. 789
Docket Number: 
Parties: Theresa Sgarlata, Respondent, v. City of Schenectady, Appellant. (Action No. 1.) Theresa Sgarlata, Respondent, v. City of Schenectady, Appellant. (Action No. 2.)
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 250
Pages: 789–791

Head Matter:
Third Department,
March, 1937.
(March 3, 1937.)
Theresa Sgarlata, Respondent, v. City of Schenectady, Appellant. (Action No. 1.) Theresa Sgarlata, Respondent, v. City of Schenectady, Appellant. (Action No. 2.)

Opinion:
McNamee, Crapser and Heffeman, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., dissents, with an opinion.
Rhodes, J.
I concur in the dissenting opinion of Presiding Justice Hill. The evidence does not establish that the inadequate culvert caused or contributed to the damage to plaintiff.