Case Name: Wenzel BELGRAM and Gayle Belgram, Appellants, v. Scott KRUEGER and Cynthia Krueger, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2010-10-15
Citations: 46 So. 3d 120
Docket Number: No. 5D09-1629
Parties: Wenzel BELGRAM and Gayle Belgram, Appellants, v. Scott KRUEGER and Cynthia Krueger, Appellees.
Judges: LAWSON, EVANDER, and COHEN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 46
Pages: 120–120

Head Matter:
Wenzel BELGRAM and Gayle Belgram, Appellants, v. Scott KRUEGER and Cynthia Krueger, Appellees.
No. 5D09-1629.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Oct. 15, 2010.
Cesery L. Bullard, of Bullard Law, Orlando, for Appellant.
Cynthia Krueger and Scott Krueger, Belmont, pro se Appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We conclude, as the trial court did, that the escrow agreement entered into by the parties was clear and unambiguous. See Abis v. Tudin, D.V.M., P.A., 18 So.3d 666 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (whether ambiguity exists is question of law). Based on the undisputed facts in the record, Appellees were entitled to summary judgment.
AFFIRMED.
LAWSON, EVANDER, and COHEN, JJ., concur.