Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. David Snell, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2002-07-22
Citations: 296 A.D.2d 558
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Snell, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 296
Pages: 558–559

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Snell, Appellant.
[745 NYS2d 705]

Opinion:
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Flaherty, J.), rendered January 18, 2001, convicting him of criminal trespass in the second degree, petit larceny, and criminal mischief in the fourth degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see People v Hirsch, 280 AD2d 612; People v Vasquez, 131 AD2d 523; People v Hall, 89 AD2d 898). Moreover, resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the trier of fact, which saw and heard the witnesses (see People v Gaimari, 176 NY 84, 94). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record (see People v Garafolo, 44 AD2d 86, 88). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]). O'Brien, J.P., Friedmann, McGinity and H. Miller, JJ., concur.