Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Lorse WEATHERSPOON, Defendant/Appellant; Lorse WEATHERSPOON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-03-28
Citations: 895 S.W.2d 644
Docket Number: Nos. 65516, 66937
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Lorse WEATHERSPOON, Defendant/Appellant. Lorse WEATHERSPOON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 895
Pages: 644–645

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Lorse WEATHERSPOON, Defendant/Appellant. Lorse WEATHERSPOON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Nos. 65516, 66937.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
March 28, 1995.
Gary E. Brotherton, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Fernando Bermudez, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of first degree burglary, § 569.160, RSMo 1994. He also appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of eiTor are without merit; no error of law appears. The judgment of the motion court is not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).