Case Name: The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, v. Zaidee Hunt, Plaintiff in Error
Court: Illinois Appellate Court
Jurisdiction: Illinois
Decision Date: 1911-10-03
Citations: 162 Ill. App. 628
Docket Number: Gen. No. 15,800
Parties: The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, v. Zaidee Hunt, Plaintiff in Error.
Judges: 
Reporter: Illinois Appellate Court Reports
Volume: 162
Pages: 628–629

Head Matter:
The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, v. Zaidee Hunt, Plaintiff in Error.
Gen. No. 15,800.
Municipal Court—when without jurisdiction, of criminal cause. The Municipal Court of the city of Chicago has no jurisdiction to entertain a prosecution for an infamous crime.
Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Frederick L. Fake, Jr., Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1909.
Reversed.
Opinion on rehearing filed October 3, 1911.
Charles M. Thomson, for plaintiff in error.
John E. W. Watman, for defendant in error; Otto B. Schram, of counsel.

Opinion:
Mr. Presiding Justice Baldwin
delivered the opinion of the court.
A criminal complaint was filed against plaintiff in error in the Municipal Court of Chicago, charging her with larceny of several small articles of an aggregate value of $2.75 from Bothschild & Company on the 3rd day of July, 1909.
About the middle of that month, she waived a jury and was tried before one of the judges of that court, who found her guilty of the charge, and imposed a sentence of imprisonment for one day in the county jail, together with a fine of $4.50 and costs. This judgment and sentence she seeks to reverse in this court, urging, in argument, principally the ground that the evidence fails to sustain the conviction.
In the case of People v. Russell, 245 Ill. 268, our Supreme Court held that the offense here charged against plaintiff in error, and of which she was convicted, is an infamous crime, and can only be prosecuted upon indictment by a grand jury. Under this decision, the Municipal Court was without jurisdiction in this case, and, therefore, the judgment must he reversed.
Reversed.