Case Name: A. C. KING et al., Appellants, v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY et al., Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1963-11-06
Citations: 323 F.2d 1005
Docket Number: No. 20299
Parties: A. C. KING et al., Appellants, v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY et al., Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 323
Pages: 1005–1006

Head Matter:
A. C. KING et al., Appellants, v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY et al., Appellees.
No. 20299.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
Nov., 6, 1963.
Rehearing Denied D.ec. 11, 1963.
Ernest D. Jackson, Sr., Jacksonville, Fla., for appellants.
« William H. Adams, III, Jacksonville, Fla., Richard R. Lyman, Toledo, Ohio, William H. Maness, Jacksonville, Fla. (Mahoney, Hadlow, Chambers & Adams, Jacksonville, Fla., Mulholland, Hickey & Lyman, Toledo, Ohio, of counsel), for appellees.
Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and JONES and BELL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellants, who were employees of the appellee Railroad Company, brought a suit against the Railroad and a Union, of which the appellants were members, claiming that the Railroad and the Union had unlawfully abolished their jobs. The district court denied relief and this Court affirmed. Britton v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company, 5th Cir. 1962, 303 F.2d 274. In remanding to the district court, this Court authorized the filing of an amended complaint. The amended complaint was filed. Mo tions for summary judgment were made by the Railroad and the Union. The district court granted summary judgment against the appellants, holding, as it and this Court had held on the former appeal, that exclusive jurisdiction was in the Railway Adjustment Board. We see no difference between the factual situation under the original complaint and that which is before us on this appeal as would call for a different result than was reached when the cause was before us earlier. The judgment of the district court is
Affirmed.