Case Name: William SOMMERVILLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jody DOBSON, Officer; James Ledbetter, Lieutenant, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-11-02
Citations: 452 F. App'x 402
Docket Number: No. 11-1334
Parties: William SOMMERVILLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jody DOBSON, Officer; James Ledbetter, Lieutenant, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 452
Pages: 402–402

Head Matter:
William SOMMERVILLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jody DOBSON, Officer; James Ledbetter, Lieutenant, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 11-1334.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 25, 2011.
Decided: Nov. 2, 2011.
Todd M. Gaynor, Taylor & Walker, PC, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellant. Kenneth T. Cuccinelli II, Attorney General of Virginia, E. Duncan Getchell, Solicitor General of Virginia, Wesley G. Russell, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, Catherine Crooks Hill, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Jeff W. Rosen, Lisa Eh-rich, Pender & Coward, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
William Sommerville appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sommerville v. Dobson, No. 4:10-cv-00067-JBF-FBS (E.D.Va. Mar. 8, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.