Case Name: NATE KNUTZEN, Appellant, v. BENNING, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1988-04-13
Citations: 90 Or. App. 434
Docket Number: 86-C12429; CA A44305
Parties: NATE KNUTZEN, Appellant, v. BENNING, Respondent.
Judges: Before Warden, Presiding Judge, and Van Hoomissen and Graber, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 90
Pages: 434–435

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted February 24,
appeal dismissed April 13, 1988
NATE KNUTZEN, Appellant, v. BENNING, Respondent.
(86-C12429; CA A44305)
752 P2d 354
Steven H. Gorham, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.
John A. Reuling, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.
Before Warden, Presiding Judge, and Van Hoomissen and Graber, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Petitioner appeals from a denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus by which he challenged the authority of the court to commit him to the Oregon State Hospital in a juvenile court proceeding. At oral argument, his counsel advised us that petitioner is no longer in the hospital, and, since then, counsel for defendant has advised us that petitioner had been released from the hospital and that the juvenile court has terminated his wardship. Because defendant no longer has custody of petitioner, any order to require defendant to deliver petitioner to the court or release him would be futile. Therefore, his appeal must be dismissed. White v. Gladden, 209 Or 53, 63, 303 P2d 226 (1956); Rahm v. Keeney, 83 Or App 266, 730 P2d 1297 (1986).
Appeal dismissed.