Case Name: In re Sherman HOWARD, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-08-14
Citations: 475 F. App'x 341
Docket Number: Misc. No. 126
Parties: In re Sherman HOWARD, Petitioner.
Judges: Before LOURIE, SCHALL, and DYK, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 475
Pages: 341–342

Head Matter:
In re Sherman HOWARD, Petitioner.
Misc. No. 126.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Aug. 14, 2012.
Marshall D. White, Esq., Law Office of Marshall D. White, San Antonio, TX, for Sherman Howard.
B. Chad Bungard, Esq., General Counsel, Merit Systems Protection Board, Washington, DC, for Merit Systems Protection Board.
Before LOURIE, SCHALL, and DYK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ON PETITION
PER CURIAM.
ORDER
Sherman Howard submits a petition for a writ of mandamus directing the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) to comply with this court's July 6, 2011 remand order in Howard v. Department of the Air Force, Appeal No.2010-3177, and for an award of attorney fees and costs associated with filing the petition under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). The MSPB responds. Howard replies.
On April 26, 2012, the MSPB issued an Opinion and Order in Howard's appeal, ordering the Department of the Air Force to, inter alia, cancel his removal and pay him back pay, interest, and other benefits due.
Howard has not shown entitlement to EAJA fees and costs related to this petition.
Accordingly,
It Is Ordered That:
(1) The petition for writ of mandamus is denied as moot.
(2) The request for attorney fees and costs incurred in association with this petition is denied.