Case Name: Arnold BOCKAR, Appellant, v. Albert SAKOLSKY, et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-07-16
Citations: 592 So. 2d 251
Docket Number: No. 90-2683
Parties: Arnold BOCKAR, Appellant, v. Albert SAKOLSKY, et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before FERGUSON, JORGENSON and GERSTEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 592
Pages: 251–252

Head Matter:
Arnold BOCKAR, Appellant, v. Albert SAKOLSKY, et al., Appellees.
No. 90-2683.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 16, 1991.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 18, 1992.
Lane S. Abraham, Miami, for appellant.
Lapidus & Frankel and Richard L. Lapi-dus, Miami, for appellees.
Before FERGUSON, JORGENSON and GERSTEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Arnold Bockar appeals from a final summary judgment in an action for breach of contract and for fraud. We affirm.
Only salaried real estate salespersons who do not receive commissions for the sale or lease of real property may sue for compensation earned without being a licensed real estate salesperson or broker. See Department of Bus. Reg. v. Smith, 471 So.2d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); § 475.-011(2), Fla.Stat. (1987).
Affirmed.
JORGENSON and GERSTEN, JJ., concur.