Case Name: M.I.F. Securities Company et al., Respondents, v. R.C. Stamm & Co., Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1983-11-29
Citations: 60 N.Y.2d 936
Docket Number: 
Parties: M.I.F. Securities Company et al., Respondents, v R.C. Stamm & Co., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 60
Pages: 936–938

Head Matter:
M.I.F. Securities Company et al., Respondents, v R.C. Stamm & Co., Appellant.
Decided November 29, 1983
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Peter R. Celia for appellant.
Stephen R. Steinberg and Judith B. Yaeger for respondents.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Joseph P. Sullivan at the Appellate Division (94 AD2d 211) except so much thereof as holds that the individual members of Stamm partnership may not demand arbitration between MIF and Stamm partnership, an issue which we deem it unnecessary to reach or consider.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.