Case Name: William PEOPLES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2005-02-23
Citations: 894 So. 2d 307
Docket Number: No. 3D05-65
Parties: William PEOPLES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before COPE, RAMIREZ, and WELLS, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 894
Pages: 307–307

Head Matter:
William PEOPLES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D05-65.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 23, 2005.
William Peoples, in proper person.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, for appellee.
Before COPE, RAMIREZ, and WELLS, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Cooper v. State, 817 So.2d 934 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (holding that a claim that a notice of intent to habitualize is not sufficiently specific must be raised in a.Rule 3.850 motion).