Case Name: W.A. Bayer Realtors, Inc., Appellant-Respondent, v. W. E. Pearse, Inc., Respondent-Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1998-12-31
Citations: 256 A.D.2d 1164
Docket Number: 
Parties: W.A. Bayer Realtors, Inc., Appellant-Respondent, v W. E. Pearse, Inc., Respondent-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 256
Pages: 1164–1165

Head Matter:
W.A. Bayer Realtors, Inc., Appellant-Respondent, v W. E. Pearse, Inc., Respondent-Appellant.
[682 NYS2d 363]

Opinion:
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied plaintiffs motion and defendant's cross motion for summary judgment. Because the parties' agreement is ambiguous and "determination of the intent of the parties depends on the credibility of extrinsic evidence or on a choice among reasonable inferences to be drawn from extrinsic evidence," summary judgment is inappropriate (Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. v Wesolowski, 33 NY2d 169, 172).
(Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Livingston County, Cicoria, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Hayes, Balio and Boehm, JJ.