Case Name: David M. POMERANCE, et al., Petitioners, v. HOMOSASSA SPECIAL WATER DISTRICT, etc., Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2001-04-12
Citations: 783 So. 2d 1056
Docket Number: No. SC00-912
Parties: David M. POMERANCE, et al., Petitioners, v. HOMOSASSA SPECIAL WATER DISTRICT, etc., Respondent.
Judges: WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 783
Pages: 1056–1056

Head Matter:
David M. POMERANCE, et al., Petitioners, v. HOMOSASSA SPECIAL WATER DISTRICT, etc., Respondent.
No. SC00-912.
Supreme Court of Florida.
April 12, 2001.
Karen 0. Gaffney, Inverness, FL, for Petitioners.
Jack A. Moring of Myers and Moring, P.A., Crystal River, Florida; and Sidney F. Ansbaeher of Upchurch, Bailey & Up-church, P.A., St. Augustine, FL, for Respondent.
Frank A. Shepherd, Miami, FL, for Pacific Legal Foundation, Amicus Curiae.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted review of the decision of the district court of appeal in Pomerance v. Homosassa Special Water District, 755 So.2d 732 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000), based on express and direct conflict with the decision in Lake County v. Water Oak Management Corp., 695 So.2d 667 (Fla.1997). Upon further consideration, we find that review was improvidently granted. Accordingly, this review proceeding is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.