Case Name: Floyd HUBBERT, Petitioner, v. JOE REINERTSON, INC., the Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1969-11-19
Citations: 228 So. 2d 275
Docket Number: No. 38518
Parties: Floyd HUBBERT, Petitioner, v. JOE REINERTSON, INC., the Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
Judges: ERVIN, C. J., THORNAL and CARLTON, JJ., and JOHN J. CREWS, Jr., Circuit Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 228
Pages: 275–276

Head Matter:
Floyd HUBBERT, Petitioner, v. JOE REINERTSON, INC., the Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
No. 38518.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Nov. 19, 1969.
Jerome H. Wolfson, Miami, for petitioner.
H. Jack Miller of Lally, Miller & Hodges, Miami, Patrick H. Mears and J. Franklin Garner, Tallahassee, for respondent.

Opinion:
ROBERTS, Justice.
Our consideration of the record, briefs and arguments in this cause leads us to the conclusion that the order of the Judge of Industrial Claims is supported by com petent substantial evidence and comports with the essential requirements of law. United States Casualty Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co., 55 So.2d 741 (Fla. 1951). The Industrial Commission, therefore, was in error when it reversed the order. Hence the ruling of the Industrial Commission of March 14, 1969 is quashed with directions to reinstate the order of the Judge of Industrial Claimed dated June 24, 1968.
It is so ordered.
ERVIN, C. J., THORNAL and CARLTON, JJ., and JOHN J. CREWS, Jr., Circuit Judge, concur.