Case Name: Claudia Sanchez GLOVER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-11-14
Citations: 153 F. App'x 910
Docket Number: No. 05-1666
Parties: Claudia Sanchez GLOVER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 153
Pages: 910–911

Head Matter:
Claudia Sanchez GLOVER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 05-1666.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 26, 2005.
Decided: Nov. 14, 2005.
Claudia Sanchez Glover, Appellant Pro Se. John Walter Sippel, Jr., Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland; Sherri Lanette Evans, Office of the United States Attorney, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Before TRAXLER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Claudia Sanchez Glover appeals a district court order denying her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court order and affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. See Glover v. Secretary, HHS, No. CA-04-693-CCB (D.Md. May 2, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
This court does not have jurisdiction to review the March 4, 2005 order dismissing Glover's complaint because Glover failed to file a timely notice of appeal from that order. When the United States or its officer or agency is a party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty days after the entry of the district court's final judgment or order, Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corr., 434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978). The district court's order of dismissal was entered on the docket on March 4, 2005. Glover's motion for reconsideration did not toll the sixty day period because it was not filed within ten days of the March 4 order. See Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(4). Glover's notice of appeal was filed on June 6, 2005, or beyond the sixty day appeal period from the March 4, 2005 order.