Case Name: James Earl SLAUGHTER, Petitioner-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. Phil PARKER, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/Cross-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-11-01
Citations: 467 F.3d 511
Docket Number: Nos. 01-6359/6464
Parties: James Earl SLAUGHTER, Petitioner-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. Phil PARKER, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/Cross-Appellee.
Judges: Before BOGGS, Chief Judge; BATCHELDER and COLE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 467
Pages: 511–514

Head Matter:
James Earl SLAUGHTER, Petitioner-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. Phil PARKER, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/Cross-Appellee.
Nos. 01-6359/6464.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Filed: Nov. 1, 2006.
Marguerite Neill Thomas, Asst. Public Advocate, Department of Public Advocacy, Frankfort, KY, for Petitioner-Appel-lee/Cross-Appellant.
Kathleen K. Schmidt, Pike & Schmidt, Sheperdsville, KY, Rodney McDaniel, Kent T. Young, Nancy S. Roncarti, Asst. Atty. General, Office of the Attorney General, Frankfort, KY, for Respondent-Appellant/Cross-Appellee.
Before BOGGS, Chief Judge; BATCHELDER and COLE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
The court having received a petition for rehearing en banc, and the petition having been circulated not only to the original panel members but also to all other active judges of this court, and less than a majority of the judges having favored the suggestion, the petition for rehearing has been referred to the original panel.
The panel has further reviewed the petition for rehearing and concludes that the issues raised in the petition were fully considered upon the original submission and decision of the cases. Accordingly, the petition is denied.