Case Name: In re Steven Donewan CARR, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-08-14
Citations: 581 F. App'x 261
Docket Number: No. 14-1550
Parties: In re Steven Donewan CARR, Petitioner.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 581
Pages: 261–261

Head Matter:
In re Steven Donewan CARR, Petitioner.
No. 14-1550.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 31, 2014.
Decided: Aug. 14, 2014.
Steven Donewan Carr, Petitioner pro se.
Before SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Steven Donewan Carr petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.