Case Name: Edna Coakley, an Infant, by William R. Coakley, Her Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. Willard E. Wheelock, Improperly Sued Herein as William E. Wheelock, Respondent; William R. Coakley, Appellant, v. Willard E. Wheelock, Improperly Sued Herein as William E. Wheelock, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1933-12
Citations: 240 A.D. 1001
Docket Number: 
Parties: Edna Coakley, an Infant, by William R. Coakley, Her Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. Willard E. Wheelock, Improperly Sued Herein as William E. Wheelock, Respondent. William R. Coakley, Appellant, v. Willard E. Wheelock, Improperly Sued Herein as William E. Wheelock, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 240
Pages: 1001–1001

Head Matter:
Edna Coakley, an Infant, by William R. Coakley, Her Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. Willard E. Wheelock, Improperly Sued Herein as William E. Wheelock, Respondent. William R. Coakley, Appellant, v. Willard E. Wheelock, Improperly Sued Herein as William E. Wheelock, Respondent.

Opinion:
— Order granting motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution reversed upon the law and the facts, without costs, and motion denied, without costs, upon the ground that the discretion was not wisely exercised upon this record. In view of the foregoing decision the appeal from the order dated September 27, 1932, is dismissed, without costs. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.