Case Name: In re Martin GONZALEZ and Mario Arroyo, Relators
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 2013-02-04
Citations: 391 S.W.3d 679
Docket Number: No. 05-13-00112-CV
Parties: In re Martin GONZALEZ and Mario Arroyo, Relators.
Judges: Before Justices MOSELEY, FRANCIS and FILLMORE.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 391
Pages: 679–680

Head Matter:
In re Martin GONZALEZ and Mario Arroyo, Relators.
No. 05-13-00112-CV.
Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.
Feb. 4, 2013.
Vincent Ndukwe, Jean Lee, Dallas, for appellants.
Gabriella Bendslev, Dallas, and John B. Worley, Rande K. Herrell, Austin, for ap-pellee.
Before Justices MOSELEY, FRANCIS and FILLMORE.

Opinion:
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice MOSELEY.
Relators contend the trial judge erred in granting a motion for new trial. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relators have not shown they are entitled to the relief requested. See Tex. R.App. P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex.1992) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator's petition for writ of mandamus.