Case Name: Robert WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2018-02-07
Citations: 238 So. 3d 282
Docket Number: Nos. 4D17–3513; 4D17–3514
Parties: Robert WASHINGTON, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 238
Pages: 282–282

Head Matter:
Robert WASHINGTON, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Nos. 4D17-3513
4D17-3514
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
[February 7, 2018]
Robert Washington, Indiantown, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Robert Washington appeals the denial of his rule 3.850 motion, as well as the trial court's order prohibiting him from filing future pro se pleadings unless signed by a member of the Florida Bar. We sua sponte consolidate the cases for review and affirm both orders. The trial court properly treated Washington's habeas petition as a successive and untimely rule 3.850 motion. Further, the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it issued the sanction order barring further pro se filings from Washington. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(n).
Affirmed .
Gerber, C.J., May and Levine, JJ., concur.