Case Name: Elijah MARSHALL, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Colie RUSHTON; Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-06-22
Citations: 187 F. App'x 274
Docket Number: No. 06-6103
Parties: Elijah MARSHALL, Jr., Petitioner—Appellant, v. Colie RUSHTON; Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents—Appellees.
Judges: Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 187
Pages: 274–274

Head Matter:
Elijah MARSHALL, Jr., Petitioner—Appellant, v. Colie RUSHTON; Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents—Appellees.
No. 06-6103.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 28, 2006.
Decided: June 22, 2006.
Elijah Marshall, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. William Edgar Salter, III, Office of the Attorney General of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Elijah Marshall, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. Marshall, however, waived his right to appeal by failing timely to file objections to the magistrate judge's recommendation. See Wells v. Shriners Hosp., 109 F.3d 198, 201 (4th Cir.1997). We therefore dismiss the appeal. Id. at 200. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.