Case Name: Casey HOLMES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2004-04-21
Citations: 870 So. 2d 919
Docket Number: No. 3D03-504
Parties: Casey HOLMES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before GERSTEN, GODERICH and SHEVIN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 870
Pages: 919–920

Head Matter:
Casey HOLMES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D03-504.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 21, 2004.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Marti Rothenberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Roberta G. Mandel, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before GERSTEN, GODERICH and SHEVIN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Casey Holmes appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. We affirm the court's denial of the motion on claim 2. However, we reverse the denial on the remaining claims raised by defendant and remand for further proceedings. The state correctly concedes that these claims are facially sufficient and that the court did not attach portions of the record conclusively refuting the claims. On remand, the court may summarily deny these claims if they are conclusively refuted by the record, and attach those portions of the record to its order, or grant defendant an evidentiary hearing. Peede v. State, 748 So.2d 253 (Fla.1999); Padilla v. State, 861 So.2d 1278 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Lasprilla v. State, 857 So.2d 1011 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).
Reversed and remanded.