Case Name: Will Glickman et al., Respondents, v. Lawrence N. Kasha et al., Individually and as Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Kasha-McKenna Productions, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1965-05-25
Citations: 23 A.D.2d 846
Docket Number: 
Parties: Will Glickman et al., Respondents, v. Lawrence N. Kasha et al., Individually and as Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Kasha-McKenna Productions, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 23
Pages: 846–846

Head Matter:
Will Glickman et al., Respondents, v. Lawrence N. Kasha et al., Individually and as Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Kasha-McKenna Productions, Appellants.

Opinion:
Judgment in favor of plaintiffs affirmed, with $50 costs to respondents. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.; Steuer, J.,. dissents upon the ground that the evidence is insufficient to establish that the dramatization rights were available and does establish that the agreement in suit was conditioned upon their being available