Case Name: Norma HUNDELT, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Craig T. HUNDELT, Respondent/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1997-04-08
Citations: 943 S.W.2d 310
Docket Number: No. 70034
Parties: Norma HUNDELT, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Craig T. HUNDELT, Respondent/Appellant.
Judges: Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 943
Pages: 310–310

Head Matter:
Norma HUNDELT, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Craig T. HUNDELT, Respondent/Appellant.
No. 70034.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
April 8, 1997.
Paul H. Schramm, Schramm & Pines, Clayton, for appellant.
James J. Leightner, Diekman & Leight-ner, Clayton, for respondent.
Thea Anne Sherry, Catalona & Sherry, Clayton, Guardian Ad Litem.
Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Craig T. Hundelt, appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis dissolving his marriage to respondent, Norma Hundelt, wherein the trial court ordered him to pay her $122 a month as periodic maintenance. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the decision of the trial court was supported by substantial evidence, was not against the weight of the evidence, and did not erroneously declare or apply the law. As no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal opinion, we affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).