Case Name: Anthony D. KING, Petitioner- Appellant, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; M. Mitchell, Warden, Edgefield, in official capacity, Respondents - Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-07-30
Citations: 329 F. App'x 504
Docket Number: No. 09-6644
Parties: Anthony D. KING, Petitioner— Appellant, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; M. Mitchell, Warden, Edgefield, in official capacity, Respondents — Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 329
Pages: 504–504

Head Matter:
Anthony D. KING, Petitioner— Appellant, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; M. Mitchell, Warden, Edgefield, in official capacity, Respondents — Appellees.
No. 09-6644.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 23, 2009.
Decided: July 30, 2009.
Anthony D. King, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Anthony King, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See King v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, No. 9-09-cv-00323-HMH, 2009 WL 764948 (D.S.C. Mar. 24, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.