Case Name: Samuel Pollock, Appellant, v. Central Fish Company, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1918-10-29
Citations: 224 N.Y. 641
Docket Number: 
Parties: Samuel Pollock, Appellant, v. Central Fish Company, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 224
Pages: 641–641

Head Matter:
Samuel Pollock, Appellant, v. Central Fish Company, Respondent.
Pollock v. Central Fish Co., 173 App. Div. 967, affirmed.
(Argued October 14, 1918;
decided October 29, 1918.)
Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 19, 1916, unanimously affirming a judgment in favor of defendant, entered upon a verdict. The action was by an employee, under a written contract, for damages for wrongful discharge. The defense admitted the contract and the discharge, and relied solely upon justification owing to plaintiff’s alleged misconduct.
Abraham H. Sarasohn for appellant.
Anson Beard for respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Hogan, Cardozo, Pound; McLaughlin and Andrews, JJ.