Case Name: GILLIN, Respondent, v. CANARY, Appellant (two cases)
Court: New York City Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1896-10-30
Citations: 41 N.Y.S. 1116
Docket Number: 
Parties: GILLIN, Respondent, v. CANARY, Appellant (two cases).
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 41
Pages: 1116–1116

Head Matter:
GILLIN, Respondent, v. CANARY, Appellant (two cases).
(City Court of New York, General Term.
October 30, 1896.)
Action by Robert F. Gillin against Thomas Canary.
Joseph C. Rosenbaum, for appellant.
Oppenheim & Severance, for respondent.

Opinion:
FITZSIMONS, J.
These two actions were, on motion of the defendant, consolidated and made one action, and he now complains because judgment was rendered against him for the sum of $4,227.50, contending that in no event can a judgment for more than $2,000 be rendered in this court. This question was passed upon adversely to the appellant's contention by this court (Bush v. Abrahams, 2 N. Y. Supp. 391) in a case similar to this one. We have examined the record carefully, and find no reason to question the judgment herein. It is therefore affirmed, with costs. SCHUCHMAN, J., concurs.