Case Name: Charles MOYER and Donna Moyer; Individually and as Personal Representatives of the Estates of Judy and Ronald Moyer; and Leisurecraft, Inc., Petitioners v. TELEDYNE CONTINENTAL MOTORS, INC., Teledyne Inc., Superior-air Parts, Inc., Piedmont Hawthorne Aviations, Inc. a/k/a Piedmont Aviation Services, Inc., Piedmont/Hawthorne Aviation, Inc., and/or Piedmont Hawthorne Aviation, LLC., and Divco, Inc., Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2011-01-25
Citations: 11 A.3d 960
Docket Number: 
Parties: Charles MOYER and Donna Moyer; Individually and as Personal Representatives of the Estates of Judy and Ronald Moyer; and Leisurecraft, Inc., Petitioners v. TELEDYNE CONTINENTAL MOTORS, INC., Teledyne Inc., Superior-air Parts, Inc., Piedmont Hawthorne Aviations, Inc. a/k/a Piedmont Aviation Services, Inc., Piedmont/Hawthorne Aviation, Inc., and/or Piedmont Hawthorne Aviation, LLC., and Divco, Inc., Respondents.
Judges: Madame Justice Orie Melvin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 11
Pages: 960–960

Head Matter:
Charles MOYER and Donna Moyer; Individually and as Personal Representatives of the Estates of Judy and Ronald Moyer; and Leisurecraft, Inc., Petitioners v. TELEDYNE CONTINENTAL MOTORS, INC., Teledyne Inc., Superior-air Parts, Inc., Piedmont Hawthorne Aviations, Inc. a/k/a Piedmont Aviation Services, Inc., Piedmont/Hawthorne Aviation, Inc., and/or Piedmont Hawthorne Aviation, LLC., and Divco, Inc., Respondents.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Jan. 25, 2011.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 25th day of January, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the following issue, as stated by Petitioners:
Did the Superior Court improperly afford blanket immunity to manufacturers for negligence and strict liability in their written instructions under GARA's rolling provision under the guise of fostering a non-existent federal policy to vindicate rights of manufacturers over those of accident victims?
The Application for Leave to File Reply to The Answers of Respondents is hereby denied as moot.
Madame Justice Orie Melvin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.