Case Name: Karien Pichardo, Appellant, v. Robin Johnson, Respondent, et al., Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2015-01-13
Citations: 124 A.D.3d 452
Docket Number: 
Parties: Karien Pichardo, Appellant, v Robin Johnson, Respondent, et al., Defendants.
Judges: Concur — Tom, J.P, Friedman, Acosta, Saxe and Kapnick, JJ.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 124
Pages: 452–453

Head Matter:
Karien Pichardo, Appellant, v Robin Johnson, Respondent, et al., Defendants.
[997 NYS2d 903]—

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered July 29, 2013, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied plaintiffs motion to amend the complaint, and sua sponte dismissed the complaint as against defendant Robin Johnson, unanimously modified, on the law, the complaint reinstated as against defendant Johnson, and otherwise affirmed, without costs
The court properly denied the motion for leave to amend the complaint because the proposed amendment was lacking in merit (see e.g. Sharon Ava & Co. v Olympic Tower Assoc., 259 AD2d 315 [1st Dept 1999]). Plaintiff sought to assert claims against defendant Johnson in her individual capacity, but none of the allegations establish that Johnson acted outside the scope of her employment.
Johnson did not move to dismiss the claims against her in her official capacity as principal of the school where plaintiff was a probationary teacher and the court should not have dismissed them sua sponte (see e.g. Purvi Enters., LLC v City of New York, 62 AD3d 508, 509 [1st Dept 2009]).
Concur — Tom, J.P, Friedman, Acosta, Saxe and Kapnick, JJ.