Case Name: Kenneth DAILEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-12-19
Citations: 41 S.W.3d 494
Docket Number: No. ED 77952
Parties: Kenneth DAILEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN and GEORGE W. DRAPER, III, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 41
Pages: 494–494

Head Matter:
Kenneth DAILEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 77952.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Dec. 19, 2000.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Feb. 22, 2001.
Application to Transfer Denied April 24, 2001.
Mark A. Grothoff, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Karen L. Kramer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN and GEORGE W. DRAPER, III, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Kenneth Dailey appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief -without a hearing in that his appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to raise various claims on appeal.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcripts and find the motion's court decision was not clearly erroneous because trial counsel's failure to object constituted trial strategy. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).