Case Name: Middleton v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1995-03-20
Citations: 71 Ohio St. 3d 1498
Docket Number: 94-2399
Parties: Middleton v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision.
Judges: 
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 71
Pages: 1498–1498

Head Matter:
94-2399.
Middleton v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision.

Opinion:
Board of Tax Appeals, No. 94-P-158. On March 6, 1995, appellant filed a reply brief pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. VI(3). On March 20, 1995, appellant filed a motion to strike the merit brief of amicus curiae in support of the position of appellees. It appears to the court that appellant's motion to strike is, in substance, a reply brief and, as such, does not comply with S.CtPrac.R. VI(3). Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, effective March 21, 1995, that appellant's motion to strike be, and hereby is, stricken.