Case Name: Theodore MacARTHUR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1999-08-25
Citations: 739 So. 2d 681
Docket Number: No. 99-1297
Parties: Theodore MacARTHUR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before JORGENSON, LEVY, and GERSTEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 739
Pages: 681–682

Head Matter:
Theodore MacARTHUR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 99-1297.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Aug. 25, 1999.
Theodore MacArthur, in proper person.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Michael J. Neimand, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before JORGENSON, LEVY, and GERSTEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Christopher v. State, 489 So.2d 22, 24 (Fla.1986)("It is well established that a court may refuse to address those issues contained in a motion for post-conviction relief that were raised on direct appeal or could have been raised on direct appeal"), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1077, 108 S.Ct. 1057, 98 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1988); Duncan v. State, 728 So.2d 1237 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); MacArthur v. State, 668 So.2d 692 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Anderson v. State, 467 So.2d 781 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (holding that trial counsel is not deemed ineffective bécause of strategic decisions made during trial).