Case Name: In the Matter of the Compensation of Rexi L. Nicholson, Claimant. Rexi L. NICHOLSON, Petitioner, v. SALEM AREA TRANSIT and SAIF Corporation, Respondents
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1994-01-26
Citations: 126 Or. App. 172
Docket Number: 91-03460; CA A76237
Parties: In the Matter of the Compensation of Rexi L. Nicholson, Claimant. Rexi L. NICHOLSON, Petitioner, v. SALEM AREA TRANSIT and SAIF Corporation, Respondents.
Judges: Before Rossman, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Leeson, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 126
Pages: 172–173

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted September 24, 1993,
affirmed January 26,
petition for review allowed May 10, 1994 (319 Or 80)
In the Matter of the Compensation of Rexi L. Nicholson, Claimant. Rexi L. NICHOLSON, Petitioner, v. SALEM AREA TRANSIT and SAIF Corporation, Respondents.
(91-03460; CA A76237)
866 P2d 525
Karen M. Werner argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the brief was Emmons, Kropp, Kryger, Alexander, Egan & Allen.
Steve Cotton, Special Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.
Before Rossman, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Leeson, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board holding that it does not have jurisdiction to review an order of the Director under ORS 656.245(1)(b) concerning the appropriateness of palliative care. We have disposed of most of the issues that claimant raises in Hathaway v. Health Future Enterprises, 125 Or App 549, 865 P2d 503 (1993). Claimant contends that the Board's ruling that claimant has no right to a hearing on palliative care disputes violates the United States and Oregon constitutions. The issue is raised for the first time on review, and we will not address it.
Affirmed.