Case Name: Immanuel GILCHRIST, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2005-04-15
Citations: 898 So. 2d 1210
Docket Number: No. 2D05-56
Parties: Immanuel GILCHRIST, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: DAVIS, KELLY, and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 898
Pages: 1210–1210

Head Matter:
Immanuel GILCHRIST, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D05-56.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
April 15, 2005.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Carter v. State, 786 So.2d 1173 (Fla.2001); Alexander v. State, 830 So.2d 899 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Brown v. State, 827 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); McGee v. State, 684 So.2d 241 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). As this court did in Alexander, 830 So.2d at 899-900, we certify the same question of great public importance:
ARE ALLEGATIONS OF AFFIRMATIVE MISADVICE BY TRIAL COUNSEL ABOUT THE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES OF A DEFENDANT'S PLEA FOR FUTURE CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR IN AN OTHERWISE FACIALLY SUFFICIENT MOTION COGNIZABLE AS AN INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL CLAIM?
Affirmed; question certified.
DAVIS, KELLY, and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.