Case Name: NEON CITY SIGN & ELECTRIC CO., et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. AUTOZONE, INC., et al., Defendants/Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-02-16
Citations: 986 S.W.2d 510
Docket Number: No. 74660
Parties: NEON CITY SIGN & ELECTRIC CO., et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. AUTOZONE, INC., et al., Defendants/Respondents.
Judges: Before: JAMES R. DOWD, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 986
Pages: 510–511

Head Matter:
NEON CITY SIGN & ELECTRIC CO., et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. AUTOZONE, INC., et al., Defendants/Respondents.
No. 74660.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Feb. 16, 1999.
Kristin F. Whittle, St. Louis,' for plaintiffs/appellants.
Stephen H. Schwartz, Jeffrey L. Rousseau, Brown & James, P.C., St. Louis, for defendants/respondents.
Before: JAMES R. DOWD, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiffs appeal the trial court's judgment dismissing with prejudice his second amended petition. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that no error of law appears. As an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).