Case Name: MARGARET GRANT, PROSECUTOR, v. METROPOLITAN ICE COMPANY, RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1931-01-20
Citations: 9 N.J. Misc. 202
Docket Number: 
Parties: MARGARET GRANT, PROSECUTOR, v. METROPOLITAN ICE COMPANY, RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 9
Pages: 202–202

Head Matter:
MARGARET GRANT, PROSECUTOR, v. METROPOLITAN ICE COMPANY, RESPONDENT.
Submitted October term, 1930
Decided January 20, 1931.
Before Justices Paekee, Campbell and Bodine.
Por the prosecutor, Joseph Goult and Gerald T. Foley.
Por the respondent, Henry Harris.

Opinion:
Pee Cueiam.
This writ brings up for review the judgment of the Common Pleas Court, upon an appeal from the findings of the workmen's compensation bureau, affirming such finding.
The sole question presented appears to be that the finding that the accident arose out of and in the course of employment was not established by competent and sufficient proof, but was based entirely upon hearsay evidence.
Our examination of the proofs causes us to concur in this contention to the extent that in some large measure this is so, and necessarily so, but also that there was corroborative proof, more or less circumstantial, warranting and justifying the findings below upon this point.
The judgment below is therefore affirmed, with costs.