Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Michael Zaro, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1992-01-09
Citations: 179 A.D.2d 384
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Zaro, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 179
Pages: 384–384

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Zaro, Appellant.

Opinion:
The hearing court properly refused to suppress testimony of a prompt showup identification by a token booth clerk who had witnessed the robbery and gave the police a detailed and accurate description of defendant. Prompt showup identifications by witnesses following a defendant's arrest at or near the crime scene are desirable to guard against mistakes and the showup procedure employed herein certainly was not unduly suggestive (People v Duuvon, 77 NY2d 541). In any event, there was, as the court found, an independent source for the witness's in-court identification (see, People v McMahon, 167 AD2d 137, 138). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Milonas, Asch and Rubin, JJ.