Case Name: HAMILTON A. BAUER et al., Appellants, v. LILY M. BAUER et al., Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1927-06-01
Citations: 201 Cal. 770
Docket Number: L. A. No. 8866
Parties: HAMILTON A. BAUER et al., Appellants, v. LILY M. BAUER et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Reports
Volume: 201
Pages: 770–771

Head Matter:
[L. A. No. 8866.
In Bank.
June 1, 1927.]
HAMILTON A. BAUER et al., Appellants, v. LILY M. BAUER et al., Respondents.
Hamilton A. Bauer for Appellants.
J. W. Morin and Morin, Newell & Brown for Respondents.
Devlin & Devlin, Amid Curiae for Appellants.
Hubbard & Johnson and T. W. Hubbard, Amici Curiae for Respondents.

Opinion:
THE COURT.
The preliminary statement made in Hamilton A. Bauer et al. v. Lily M. Bauer et al., ante, p. 267 [256 Pac. 820], is applicable in all respects to the instant case. We therefore adopt the decision formerly rendered in this case, which was vacated upon the order granting the petition for rehearing, as our decision in the instant case. It follows:
"This is an action on behalf of certain heirs and legatees of Emile Baner, deceased, to recover to his estate certain stock of the Occidental Life Insurance Company, which plaintiffs allege was procured by Lloyd C. Bauer, one of the defendants, from Emile Bauer in his lifetime by fraud and undue influence. The principle involved in this case is identical with the principal involved in the case of Hamilton A. Bauer et al. v. Lily M. Bauer et al., ante, p. 267 [256 Pac. 820]. On the authority of that case, therefore, the judgment in this case is affirmed."