Case Name: In the Matter of Philip Savory et al., Appellants, against S. Howard Cohen et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents. Donald Brooks et al., Interveners, Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1939-10-17
Citations: 281 N.Y. 715
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Philip Savory et al., Appellants, against S. Howard Cohen et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents. Donald Brooks et al., Interveners, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 281
Pages: 715–716

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Philip Savory et al., Appellants, against S. Howard Cohen et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents. Donald Brooks et al., Interveners, Respondents.
Argued September 28, 1939;
decided October 17, 1939.
Henry B. Lamm and Joseph Pinckney for appellants.
William C. Chanler, Corporation Counsel {Loren C. Berry and Paxton Blair of counsel), for Board of Elections, respondent.
Reuel M. Jordan and Darwin W. Telesford for Donald Brooks, respondent. .

Opinion:
Appeal dismissed, without costs, on the ground the question is academic. No opinion.
Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ. Taking no part: O'Brien, J.