Case Name: In the Matter of Julius L. Rosenthal, an Attorney, Appellant; Charles J. W. Meisel et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1938-01-11
Citations: 276 N.Y. 676
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Julius L. Rosenthal, an Attorney, Appellant; Charles J. W. Meisel et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 276
Pages: 676–676

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Julius L. Rosenthal, an Attorney, Appellant; Charles J. W. Meisel et al., Respondents.
Argued December 9, 1937;
decided January 11, 1938.
Irving I. Goldsmith for appellant.
Charles J. W. Meisel and Bernard J. Ferguson, petitioners, respondents.

Opinion:
Order affirmed. Any application for mitigation of the rigor of the punishment must be addressed to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Appellate Division. No opinion.
Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O'Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ.