Case Name: Arthur Leroy LARK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-06-12
Citations: 599 So. 2d 289
Docket Number: No. 91-2206
Parties: Arthur Leroy LARK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 599
Pages: 289–290

Head Matter:
Arthur Leroy LARK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 91-2206.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
June 12, 1992.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Lyle Hitchens, Asst. Public Defender, Day-tona Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Belle B. Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
COBB, Judge.
After a review of the record and briefs, we can discern only one issue which requires our attention. As the defendant correctly points out, and the state conceded, an extra forty-two points were assessed on the sentencing guideline score-sheet for legal constraint. The deduction of these points alters the recommended range and the permitted range creating the appearance of a departure sentence without written reasons.
Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed and the sentence is vacated and remanded to the trial court for resentencing as a departure sentence or for resentencing within the guidelines. State v. Betancourt, 552 So.2d 1107 (Fla.1989).
AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED.
PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.