Case Name: Herman Gursslin, Respondent, v. Mildred Helenboldt and Carl Helenboldt, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1940-06-28
Citations: 259 A.D. 1064
Docket Number: 
Parties: Herman Gursslin, Respondent, v. Mildred Helenboldt and Carl Helenboldt, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 259
Pages: 1064–1064

Head Matter:
Herman Gursslin, Respondent, v. Mildred Helenboldt and Carl Helenboldt, Appellants.

Opinion:
Judgment and order reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellants to abide the event. Memorandum: It was prejudicial error to permit plaintiff's expert medical witness to testify over defendants' objection and exception to matters shown by the X-rays without introducing the X-ray pictures in evidence. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an automobile negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Harris and McCurn, JJ.