Case Name: David SNYDER, Renee Snyder and Allan Snyder, Appellants, v. VOLKSWAGEN OF AMERICA, INC. and Audi A.G., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-02-06
Citations: 574 So. 2d 1161
Docket Number: No. 89-3001
Parties: David SNYDER, Renee Snyder and Allan Snyder, Appellants, v. VOLKSWAGEN OF AMERICA, INC. and Audi A.G., Appellees.
Judges: WARNER and POLEN, JJ., and SHAHOOD, GEORGE A., Associate Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 574
Pages: 1161–1162

Head Matter:
David SNYDER, Renee Snyder and Allan Snyder, Appellants, v. VOLKSWAGEN OF AMERICA, INC. and Audi A.G., Appellees.
No. 89-3001.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb. 6, 1991.
Rehearing Denied March 12, 1991.
Thomas James O’Grady of Law Office of Thomas James O’Grady, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellants.
Peter L. Wechsler, Scott M. Sarason, and Wendy F. Lumish of Rumberger, Kirk, Caldwell, Cabaniss, Burke & Wechsler, Miami, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We find no merit in the five issues raised by appellants before this court on appeal. We write, however, to dispose of a sixth issue raised for the first time in appellants' reply brief.
An issue raised for the first time on appeal in appellants' reply brief, even though properly preserved for appeal, will not be considered by this court. St. Regis Paper Co. v. R.D. Hill, 198 So.2d 365 (Fla. 1st DCA 1967); Pursell v. Sumter Electric Co-Operative, 169 So.2d 515 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964). Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.210(d) provides that a reply brief "shall contain argument in response and rebuttal to argument presented in the answer brief." Without strict adherence to this rule, the appellees are left unable to respond in writing to new issues presented by the appellants, and the filing deadline imposed on the appellants for their initial brief is rendered meaningless.
AFFIRMED.
WARNER and POLEN, JJ., and SHAHOOD, GEORGE A., Associate Judge, concur.