Case Name: Greg H. HOELTING and Stephanie Hoelting, Appellants, v. CITY OF WELDON SPRING, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-02-22
Citations: 162 S.W.3d 109
Docket Number: No. ED 84409
Parties: Greg H. HOELTING and Stephanie Hoelting, Appellants, v. CITY OF WELDON SPRING, Respondent.
Judges: Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 162
Pages: 109–109

Head Matter:
Greg H. HOELTING and Stephanie Hoelting, Appellants, v. CITY OF WELDON SPRING, Respondent.
No. ED 84409.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Feb. 22, 2005.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 19, 2005.
Application for Transfer Denied May 31, 2005.
Harold G. Johnson, St. Ann, MO, for Appellant.
Robert M. Wohler, O’Fallon, MO, for Respondent.
Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Greg and Stephanie Hoelting (collectively referred to as "the Hoeltings") appeal the judgment entered following a bench trial in favor of the City of Weldon Spring ('Weldon Spring") concerning the special Neighborhood Improvement District (NID) tax assessment as well as their claim for attorney fees. On appeal, the Hoeltings argue the trial court erred (1) in ruling they had to pay Weldon Spring's NID tax assessment because Weldon Spring failed to show that they received a benefit and (2) in failing to award attorney fees to the Hoeltings. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).