Case Name: Roy F. Tetor, Respondent, v. Dorothy E. Stansbury, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Reinzi T. Stansbury, Deceased, et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1953-03-20
Citations: 281 A.D. 952
Docket Number: 
Parties: Roy F. Tetor, Respondent, v. Dorothy E. Stansbury, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Reinzi T. Stansbury, Deceased, et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 281
Pages: 952–952

Head Matter:
Roy F. Tetor, Respondent, v. Dorothy E. Stansbury, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Reinzi T. Stansbury, Deceased, et al., Appellants.

Opinion:
Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Memorandum: The proposed amendment setting up section 36 of the Civil Practice Act has no applicability to an action of this character. All concur. (Appeal from an order denying defendants' motion for leave to serve an amended answer.) Present — Taylor, P. J., MeCurn, Vaughan, Kimball and Piper, JJ.