Case Name: FRANK FRANKO, RESPONDENT, v. OHIO CHEMICAL AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1931-04-17
Citations: 107 N.J.L. 518
Docket Number: 
Parties: FRANK FRANKO, RESPONDENT, v. OHIO CHEMICAL AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 107
Pages: 518–519

Head Matter:
FRANK FRANKO, RESPONDENT, v. OHIO CHEMICAL AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY, APPELLANT.
Submitted October 31, 1930
Decided April 17, 1931.
For the respondent, Samuel Greenstone.
For the appellant, Collins & Corbin.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam, in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chiee Justice, Parker, Campbell, Bodine, Daly, Donges, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.