Case Name: BAKERSFIELD & KERN ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY (a Corporation), Petitioner, v. GEORGE W. HAY et al., Respondents
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1915-12-31
Citations: 29 Cal. App. 793
Docket Number: Civ. No. 1933
Parties: BAKERSFIELD & KERN ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY (a Corporation), Petitioner, v. GEORGE W. HAY et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports
Volume: 29
Pages: 793–793

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 1933.
Second Appellate District.
December 31, 1915.]
BAKERSFIELD & KERN ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY (a Corporation), Petitioner, v. GEORGE W. HAY et al., Respondents.
Referendum Petition—Election—City of Bakersfield.—Writ of mandate denied on the authority of Bakersfield # Kern Electric By. Go. v. Kay, ante, p. 289.
APPLICATION for a writ of mandate.
The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion in Bakersfield & Kern Electric By. Go. v. Hay, ante, p. 289-,
Short & Sutherland, and Borton & Theile, for Petitioner.
E. F. Brittan, and Walter Osborn, for Respondents.

Opinion:
THE COURT.
In response to an alternative writ issued herein, the respondents have filed a general demurrer. The facts are the same and the questions presented for decision are the same as in Bakersfield tfe Kern Electric Ry. Co. v. Hay (Civil No. 1934), ante, p. 289 [155 Pac. 132], petition for writ of prohibition, in which decision has been filed this day. For the reasons stated in the opinion filed in that case the demurrer is sustained and the application for peremptory writ of mandate herein is denied.