Case Name: Anthony J. Kadysewski, Petitioner v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Respondent
Court: Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1980-01-22
Citations: 48 Pa. Commw. 629
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 2134 C.D. 1978
Parties: Anthony J. Kadysewski, Petitioner v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Respondent.
Judges: before Judges Blatt, Craig and MácPhail, sitting as a panel of three.
Reporter: Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court Reports
Volume: 48
Pages: 629–630

Head Matter:
Anthony J. Kadysewski, Petitioner v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Respondent.
Argued November 14, 1979,
before Judges Blatt, Craig and MácPhail, sitting as a panel of three.
Terrance J. Herron, for petitioner.
Charles G. Hasson, Assistant Attorney General, with him, Edward G. Biester, Jr., Acting Attorney General, for respondent.
January 22, 1980:

Opinion:
Opinion by
Judge Blatt,
Anthony J. Kadysewski (claimant) appeals from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) which denied him benefits under Section 402(b)(1) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. §802(b)(l), for voluntarily terminating his employment without cause of a necessitous and compelling nature. He is a transportation planner/engineer, and he argues that he was forced to resign because his employer required him to perform administrative and clerical jobs which were not within his agreed-upon job description. There is substantial evidence, however, to support the finding of the Board that "the claimant's actual duties substantially conformed to those which had been agreed upon." We will therefore affirm the order of the Board. See, e.g,, Shriner v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 42 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 368, 400 A.2d 934 (1979).
Order
And Now, this 22nd day of January, 1980, the order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review in the above-captioned matter is hereby affirmed.
This decision was reached prior to the expiration of the term of office of Judge DiSalle.