Case Name: Rodolfo VELASQUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC; Fannie Mae, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-01-06
Citations: 465 F. App'x 636
Docket Number: No. 11-15090
Parties: Rodolfo VELASQUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC; Fannie Mae, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 465
Pages: 636–637

Head Matter:
Rodolfo VELASQUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC; Fannie Mae, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 11-15090.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 19, 2011.
Filed Jan. 6, 2012.
Rodolfo Velasquez, Vallejo, CA, pro se. Sung-Min Christopher Yoo, Esquire, Al-varadoSmith, APC, Santa Ana, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, Velasquez’s request for oral argument is denied.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Rodolfo Velasquez appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing his action arising out of foreclosure proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 656 F.3d 1034, 1040 (9th Cir.2011). We affirm.
We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its order entered on January 10, 2011, dismissing Velasquez's action.
Velasquez's remaining contentions are unpersuasive.
We do not consider Velasquez's contentions raised for the first time on appeal. See Smith v. Marsh, 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir.1999).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.