Case Name: Edwin SCOTT, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-05-25
Citations: 759 So. 2d 683
Docket Number: No. SC95615
Parties: Edwin SCOTT, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 759
Pages: 683–684

Head Matter:
Edwin SCOTT, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. SC95615.
Supreme Court of Florida.
May 25, 2000.
Kathleen M. Williams, Federal Public Defender, and Kenneth M. Swartz, Supervisory Assistant Federal Public Defender, Miami, Florida, for Petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Michael J. Neimand, Assistant Attorney General, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have for review Scott v. State, 729 So.2d 533 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999), which is a per curiam decision citing to Peart v. State, 705 So.2d 1059 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), quashed, 756 So.2d 42 (Fla.2000). See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418 (Fla.1981). However, we have determined that jurisdiction was improvidently granted; thus, the case is hereby dismissed.
It is so ordered.
HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
ANSTEAD, J., dissents.