Case Name: Peter S. Scott, respondent, v. John E. Curtis et al., appellants
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1926-05-17
Citations: 99 N.J. Eq. 890
Docket Number: 
Parties: Peter S. Scott, respondent, v. John E. Curtis et al., appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 99
Pages: 890–893

Head Matter:
Peter S. Scott, respondent, v. John E. Curtis et al., appellants.
[Decided May 17th, 1926.]
Mr. Charles A. Otto, for the respondent.
Mr. Merritt Lane, for the appellants.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Teefchaed, Pabkee, Mintubn, Kalisoh, Black, Katzehbach, Campbell, White, Gabdkee, Van Buskiek, McGlekkon, Kays, HetFIELD, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.