Case Name: UNDER SEAL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNDER SEAL; Under Seal, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-02-23
Citations: 467 F. App'x 236
Docket Number: No. 11-2286
Parties: UNDER SEAL, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. UNDER SEAL; Under Seal, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 467
Pages: 236–237

Head Matter:
UNDER SEAL, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. UNDER SEAL; Under Seal, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 11-2286.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 21, 2012.
Decided: Feb. 23, 2012.
Under Seal, Appellant Pro Se. Craig Wittman, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The pro se plaintiff/relator in this qui tarn suit appeals the district court's orders dismissing his action and denying his subsequent motions to reconsider its ruling. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, though we grant the Plaintiffs pending motion to seal, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.