Case Name: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Eugene C. BAIN, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-10-26
Citations: 661 So. 2d 1215
Docket Number: No. 85294
Parties: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Eugene C. BAIN, Respondent.
Judges: GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN, HARDING WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 661
Pages: 1215–1216

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Eugene C. BAIN, Respondent.
No. 85294.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Oct. 26, 1995.
Robert A Butterworth, Attorney General; Joan Fowler, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Chief and Georgina Jimenez-Orosa, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for Petitioner.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender; and Ellen Morris and David McPherrin, Assistant Public Defenders, Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, West Palm Beach, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have for review Bain v. State, 650 So.2d 83 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), in which the district court addressed the same question we recently answered in State v. Hamilton, 20 Fla.L.Weekly S465, 660 So.2d 1038 (Fla. Sept. 14, 1995). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 8(b)(3), Fla. Const.
In accordance with our decision in Hamilton, we approve the decision of the district court in this case.
It is so ordered.
GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN, HARDING WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.
. Because of our resolution of this issue we decline to address the other issues raised on review.