Case Name: Brent DUCHSHERER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-07-31
Citations: 50 S.W.3d 928
Docket Number: No. WD 58930
Parties: Brent DUCHSHERER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before EDWIN H. SMITH, P.J., and HOWARD and HOLLIGER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 50
Pages: 928–929

Head Matter:
Brent DUCHSHERER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 58930.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
July 31, 2001.
Emmett D. Queener, Assistant Public Defender, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Evan J. Buchheim, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before EDWIN H. SMITH, P.J., and HOWARD and HOLLIGER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Brent Duchsherer appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. He alleges that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because there was no factual basis for his guilty plea to felony nonsupport of a child under § 568.040 RSMo 1994.
Finding the motion court's ruling on the Rule 24.035 motion is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous, we affirm by this summary order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). We have provided a memorandum to the parties explaining the reasons for our decision.