Case Name: In re Samuel Wade DOOLEY, Relator
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 2010-02-23
Citations: 306 S.W.3d 414
Docket Number: No. 05-09-01061-CV
Parties: In re Samuel Wade DOOLEY, Relator.
Judges: Before Chief Justice WRIGHT and Justices O’NEILL and MURPHY.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 306
Pages: 414–414

Head Matter:
In re Samuel Wade DOOLEY, Relator.
No. 05-09-01061-CV.
Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.
Feb. 23, 2010.
Samuel Wade Dooley, Midway TX, pro se.
Michael R. Casillas, Dallas Dist. Atty., Dallas, TX, for Real Party in Interest.
Before Chief Justice WRIGHT and Justices O’NEILL and MURPHY.

Opinion:
NUNC PRO TUNC OPINION
Opinion by
Justice MURPHY.
On September 3, 2009, relator filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris, but did not file a petition for writ of mandamus. On September 23, 2009, we sent relator a letter informing him that we would take no action on his motion until a petition was filed. Although we have received occasional correspondence from relator, no petition has been filed to date. Accordingly, we DISMISS this case. Any petition for writ of mandamus filed by relator in the future will be filed under a new cause number.