Case Name: CITY OF PITTSBURGH, Respondent v. FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, Fort Pitt Lodge No. 1, Petitioner
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2019-01-16
Citations: 200 A.3d 937
Docket Number: No. 293 WAL 2018
Parties: CITY OF PITTSBURGH, Respondent
v.
FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, Fort Pitt Lodge No. 1, Petitioner
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 200
Pages: 937–937

Head Matter:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, Respondent
v.
FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, Fort Pitt Lodge No. 1, Petitioner
No. 293 WAL 2018
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
January 16, 2019
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 16th day of January, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Did the Commonwealth Court ignore this Supreme Court's existing mandate to defer to a grievance arbitrator's straightforward interpretation of contract language by mislabeling her award the construction of an equitable result, thereby weakening the general assembly's intent for Act 111 awards to create a final and binding resolution of contract disputes?