Case Name: CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Clair D. FOSTER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1986-09-16
Citations: 716 S.W.2d 491
Docket Number: No. 50926
Parties: CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Clair D. FOSTER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 716
Pages: 491–491

Head Matter:
CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Clair D. FOSTER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 50926.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Sept. 16, 1986.
Clair D. Foster, pro se.
John J. Morton, William R. Werner, Jennifer H. Fisher, St. Louis, for plaintiff-respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant, who was convicted of municipal ordinance violations, appeals from an order dismissing his applications for trial de novo in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis. We affirm. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).