Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Roe Harold LANCE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1978-01-19
Citations: 561 S.W.2d 446
Docket Number: No. 10636
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Roe Harold LANCE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: All concur.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 561
Pages: 446–447

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Roe Harold LANCE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10636.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Springfield District.
Jan. 19, 1978.
John D. Ashcroft, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff-respondent.
Ted M. Henson, Jr., Scott & Henson, Poplar Bluff, for defendant-appellant.

Opinion:
BILLINGS, Chief Judge.
A Stoddard County jury convicted defendant of first degree robbery and fixed his punishment at 25 years imprisonment. Defendant's motion for new trial was overruled and the court granted allocution, rendered judgment and pronounced sentence.
The transcript filed herein shows that in entering judgment the clerk omitted the offense for which defendant was convicted. Rule 27.11, V.A.M.R., requires the judgment entered to state "briefly the offense for which such conviction shall have been had . . . ." See: State v. Lance, 561 S.W.2d 445 (Mo.App.1978); State v. Wilke, 560 S.W.2d 601 (Mo.App.1978); State v. Shipman, 560 S.W.2d 603 (Mo.App.1978).
Defendant's appeal is ordered held in abeyance and the cause is remanded to the trial court for entry of judgment as required by Rule 27.11. Upon receipt of a supplemental transcript containing the proper judgment, the appeal will be re-submitted. State v. Wilke, supra.
It is so ordered.
Remanded with directions.
All concur.