Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas Johnson SEAY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1971-08-25
Citations: 446 F.2d 1399
Docket Number: No. 71-1629
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas Johnson SEAY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 446
Pages: 1399–1399

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas Johnson SEAY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 71-1629
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 25, 1971.
Harry Wilters, Jr., Bay Minette, Ala. (Court-appointed), for defendant-appellant.
Irwin W. Coleman, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., C. S. White-Spunner, Jr., U. S. Atty., Mobile, Ala., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before BELL, AINSWORTH and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges.
Rule 18, 5th Cir.; See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Responding to the mandate of this court on a prior appeal, United States v. Seay, 432 F.2d 395 (5th Cir. 1970), the District Court has conducted an evi-dentiary hearing and entered findings of fact as to the knowledge possessed by the Mobile, Alabama, police at the time they booked Seay for vagrancy and took his fingerprints, and has concluded that there was probable cause for the said arrest. The record in this court has been supplemented by these additional proceedings and findings.
We' have reviewed the supplemental record. The findings of the District Court are not plainly erroneous. They are affirmed, with the consequence that the conviction of Seay, held on the prior appeal to be otherwise subject to af-firmance, must be, and hereby is, affirmed.