Case Name: Richard D. NAVARRO, Respondent v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, Petitioner
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2018-12-18
Citations: 199 A.3d 339
Docket Number: No. 396 MAL 2018
Parties: Richard D. NAVARRO, Respondent
v.
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, Petitioner
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 199
Pages: 339–339

Head Matter:
Richard D. NAVARRO, Respondent
v.
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, Petitioner
No. 396 MAL 2018
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
December 18, 2018
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 18th day of December, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Did the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court err when it reversed a decision of the Pennsylvania Office of the Attorney General upholding a decision of the Pennsylvania State Police to deny a firearms background check, based on a failure of the ALJ to determine if a firearm had moved in interstate commerce, when the statute, 18 Pa.C.S. § 6111.1(e), does not require such a finding?