Case Name: ISAAC N. QUIMBY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. MARY ANN KING, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1881-06
Citations: 43 N.J.L. 454
Docket Number: 
Parties: ISAAC N. QUIMBY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. MARY ANN KING, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 43
Pages: 454–455

Head Matter:
ISAAC N. QUIMBY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. MARY ANN KING, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
Error to Hudson Circuit.
For the plaintiff in error, 8. B. Ransom.
For the defendant in error, Collins & Corbin.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judge, in accordance with the directions of the one hundred and thirty-eighth section of the Practice act, amended the pleadings for the purpose of determining, in the existing suit, the real question in controversy between the parties. There was no error in this, and consequently there was no error in the refusal to charge complained of, which was correct in view of the amendment.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Dixon, Parker, Reed, Van Syckel, Clement, Cole, Dodd, Green, Whittaker. 11.
For reversal—None.