Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leonard Antonio ENRIQUEZ-VALDES, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-08-11
Citations: 192 F. App'x 907
Docket Number: No. 05-13971
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leonard Antonio ENRIQUEZ-VALDES, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before BARKETT, CARNES and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 192
Pages: 907–907

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leonard Antonio ENRIQUEZ-VALDES, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-13971
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Aug. 11, 2006.
Anne R. Schultz, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Richard L. Rosenbaum, Law Offices of Richard L. Rosenbaum, Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before BARKETT, CARNES and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Richard L. Rosenbaum, counsel for Leonard Antonio Enriquez-Valdes in this appeal after resentencing, has moved to withdraw from further representation of appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Valdes's sentences are AFFIRMED.
. We previously affirmed Valdes's convictions, but vacated the judgment and remanded for resentencing. See United States v. Garcia, 405 F.3d 1260, 1265, 1274-76 (11th Cir.2005).