Case Name: Rodney Lee RODIS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA; Warden, FCI-Butner, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-03-20
Citations: 470 F. App'x 163
Docket Number: No. 12-6112
Parties: Rodney Lee RODIS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA; Warden, FCI-Butner, Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 470
Pages: 163–163

Head Matter:
Rodney Lee RODIS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA; Warden, FCI-Butner, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 12-6112.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 15, 2012.
Decided: March 20, 2012.
Rodney Lee Rodis, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Paul Murphy, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Rodney Lee Rodis seeks to appeal the magistrate judge's order outlining procedural and clerical directives. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Rodis seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.