Case Name: Ralph NADER, Candidate for President of the United States; Stephen E. Smaha; Suzanne Russo; and Lucretia Krause, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Geoffrey S. CONNOR, Secretary of State for the State of Texas, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-10-06
Citations: 388 F.3d 137
Docket Number: No. 04-50901
Parties: Ralph NADER, Candidate for President of the United States; Stephen E. Smaha; Suzanne Russo; and Lucretia Krause, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Geoffrey S. CONNOR, Secretary of State for the State of Texas, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before DeMOSS, DENNIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 388
Pages: 137–138

Head Matter:
Ralph NADER, Candidate for President of the United States; Stephen E. Smaha; Suzanne Russo; and Lucretia Krause, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Geoffrey S. CONNOR, Secretary of State for the State of Texas, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 04-50901.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Oct. 6, 2004.
James Carter Linger (argued), Tulsa, OK, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
Edward Donald Burbaeh (argued), Kathlyn C. Wilson, Matthew F. Stowe, Austin, TX, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before DeMOSS, DENNIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Plaintiffs-Appellants Ralph Nader, et al., appeal from the district court's decision denying their First and Fourteenth Amendment constitutional challenges to the Texas Election Code, specifically sections 192.32(a), 192.32(b)(3)(A), 192.32(c), and 192.32(d). Essentially for the reasons as well stated in the district court's memorandum opinion, Nader v. Connor, 332 F.Supp.2d 982 (W.D.Tex.2004), we AFFIRM that court's final judgment declar ing the challenged Texas Election Code provisions legal and constitutional.
AFFIRMED.