Case Name: Windisch, Appellant, v. First Camden Nat. Bank & Trust Co.
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1932-02-03
Citations: 306 Pa. 194
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 369
Parties: Windisch, Appellant, v. First Camden Nat. Bank & Trust Co.
Judges: Before Frazer, C. J., Simpson, Kephart, Schaefer, Maxey and Drew, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 306
Pages: 194–195

Head Matter:
Windisch, Appellant, v. First Camden Nat. Bank & Trust Co.
Argued January 7,1932.
Before Frazer, C. J., Simpson, Kephart, Schaefer, Maxey and Drew, JJ.
February 3, 1932:
H. James Sautter, with him Raymond J. Sicer, for appellant.
Richard Kingsbury Stevens, of Stradley, Ronon, Stevens & Denby, for appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam,
We are of opinion that this is not a ease "clear and free from doubt," this being so, the order discharging the rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense is affirmed: Colonial Securities Co. v. Levy et al. (No. 2), 302 Pa. 329, 331; Sharples v. Northampton Trans. Co., 303 Pa. 211, 212; Chelten Avenue Building Corp. v. Mayer, 306 Pa. 225; Penna. Co. for Insurances, etc., v. Bergson, 307 Pa. 44.
The order of the court below is affirmed.