Case Name: Paul Christopher ORTIZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2011-06-03
Citations: 62 So. 3d 684
Docket Number: No. 5D10-2498
Parties: Paul Christopher ORTIZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SAWAYA, TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 62
Pages: 684–685

Head Matter:
Paul Christopher ORTIZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D10-2498.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
June 3, 2011.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and George D.E. Burden, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Ap-pellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Smith v. State, 59 So.3d 1107 (Fla.2011), (juror's surname, without more, is insufficient to trigger inquiry as to whether strike was exercised for discriminatory reason); Carratelli v. State, 961 So.2d 312, 318 (Fla.2007) (preservation of challenge to potential juror requires more than one objection; when trial court denies or grants peremptory challenge, objecting party must renew and reserve objection béfore jury is sworn).
SAWAYA, TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.