Case Name: Michael Alonza RUFUS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-07-07
Citations: 667 F. App'x 379
Docket Number: No. 16-6120
Parties: Michael Alonza RUFUS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 667
Pages: 379–380

Head Matter:
Michael Alonza RUFUS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 16-6120
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 29, 2016
Decided: July 7, 2016
Michael Alonza Rufus, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael Alonza Rufus appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Rufus v. United States, No. 6:15-cv-02127-MBS (D.S.C. Jan. 4, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and- legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED