Case Name: In re Steven Rollins SCOTT, d/b/a Steve R. Scott & Assoc., f/d/b/a Tempo Centre, 811 Barton, Debtor. Steven Rollins SCOTT, d/b/a Steve R. Scott & Assoc., f/d/b/a Tempo Centre, 811 Barton, Plaintiff, v. RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION as Receiver of Southwest Federal Savings Association, Defendant
Court: United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Texas
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1994-01-21
Citations: 162 B.R. 1004
Docket Number: Bankruptcy No. 91-51178-C; Adv. No. 91-5168-C
Parties: In re Steven Rollins SCOTT, d/b/a Steve R. Scott & Assoc., f/d/b/a Tempo Centre, 811 Barton, Debtor. Steven Rollins SCOTT, d/b/a Steve R. Scott & Assoc., f/d/b/a Tempo Centre, 811 Barton, Plaintiff, v. RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION as Receiver of Southwest Federal Savings Association, Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Bankruptcy Reporter
Volume: 162
Pages: 1004–1004

Head Matter:
In re Steven Rollins SCOTT, d/b/a Steve R. Scott & Assoc., f/d/b/a Tempo Centre, 811 Barton, Debtor. Steven Rollins SCOTT, d/b/a Steve R. Scott & Assoc., f/d/b/a Tempo Centre, 811 Barton, Plaintiff, v. RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION as Receiver of Southwest Federal Savings Association, Defendant.
Bankruptcy No. 91-51178-C.
Adv. No. 91-5168-C.
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas, San Antonio Division.
Jan. 21, 1994.

Opinion:
ORDER WITHDRAWING OPINION
LEIF M. CLARK, Bankruptcy Judge.
This court issued a decision in the foregoing adversary proceeding, denying the motion of the RTC to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and entering findings and conclusions in support of a judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The decision is published at 157 B.R. 297. Since the publication of that decision, the parties have entered into a global settlement, incident to which a plan of reorganization has now been confirmed. One aspect of the settlement was the request of the parties that this court withdraw the above-referenced decision, a request that this court granted, in the interests of furthering the settlement. Accordingly, it is the order of this court that the Decision and Order on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment, be and the same is hereby vacated and withdrawn.
So ORDERED.