Case Name: In re Andrew Clifford MOORE, Debtor. George E. McDermott, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Andrew Clifford Moore, Defendant-Appellee. In re Andrew Clifford Moore, Debtor. George E. McDermott, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Andrew Clifford Moore, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-01-23
Citations: 2 F. App'x 304
Docket Number: Nos. 00-1888, 00-2034
Parties: In re Andrew Clifford MOORE, Debtor. George E. McDermott, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Andrew Clifford Moore, Defendant-Appellee. In re Andrew Clifford Moore, Debtor. George E. McDermott, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Andrew Clifford Moore, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 2
Pages: 304–305

Head Matter:
In re Andrew Clifford MOORE, Debtor. George E. McDermott, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Andrew Clifford Moore, Defendant-Appellee. In re Andrew Clifford Moore, Debtor. George E. McDermott, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Andrew Clifford Moore, Defendant-Appellee.
Nos. 00-1888, 00-2034.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 18, 2001.
Decided Jan. 23, 2001.
George E. McDermott, pro se. Andrew Clifford Moore, pro se.
Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In appeal No. 00-1888, George McDermott appeals from the district court's order denying his motion challenging the reassignment of his case and requesting that Judge Messitte recuse himself from McDermott's case. Because McDermott failed to allege any partiality arising from an extrajudicial source, In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 827 (4th Cir.1987), we affirm the district court's order denying the motion.
Appeal No. 00-2034 is McDermott's appeal from the district court's order affirming the bankruptcy court's order entering a final decree and dismissing Andrew Moore's Chapter 11 bankruptcy case. We have reviewed the record and the district court's memorandum opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McDermott v. Moore, No. CA-00-190PJM; BK-88-42746 (D.Md. July 24, 2000). We deny McDermott's motion for a directed verdict and his motion to recuse three judges from this appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.