Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Randle Porter COOKE, Respondent-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-12-18
Citations: 624 F. App'x 126
Docket Number: No. 15-7199
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Randle Porter COOKE, Respondent-Appellant.
Judges: Before GREGORY and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 624
Pages: 126–127

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Randle Porter COOKE, Respondent-Appellant.
No. 15-7199.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 15, 2015.
Decided: Dec. 18, 2015.
James B. Craven, III, Durham, North Carolina, for Appellant. Michael Breden-berg, Special Assistant United States Attorney, G. Norman Acker, III, Matthew Fesak, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Seth Morgan Wood, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before GREGORY and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM;
Randle Porter Cooke appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a review hearing. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Cooke, No. 5:09-hc-02034-FL (E.D.N.C. July 8, 2015). We deny Cooke's motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.