Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rolando BLAS DE LA ROSA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-07-19
Citations: 523 F. App'x 691
Docket Number: No. 12-16075
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rolando BLAS DE LA ROSA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before CARNES, BARKETT and HILL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 523
Pages: 691–691

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rolando BLAS DE LA ROSA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-16075
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
July 19, 2013.
Patricia D. Barksdale, Arnold B. Cors-meier, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Jacksonville, FL, Robert E. O’Neill, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Roland Falcon, Law Office of Roland Falcon, Jacksonville, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before CARNES, BARKETT and HILL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Roland Falcon, appointed counsel for Rolando Blas de la Rosa in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and De la Rosa's conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.