Case Name: Walter C. EWERS, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, Jack Jeter, Plaintiff, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF the COUNTY OF CURRY and Anita C. Merrill and Michael C. Gattis, individually, and in their official capacities as members of the Board of Curry County Commissioners, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1987-03-13
Citations: 813 F.2d 1583
Docket Number: Nos. 84-2437, 84-2477
Parties: Walter C. EWERS, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, Jack Jeter, Plaintiff, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF the COUNTY OF CURRY and Anita C. Merrill and Michael C. Gattis, individually, and in their official capacities as members of the Board of Curry County Commissioners, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees.
Judges: Before HOLLOWAY, Chief Judge, BARRETT, Circuit Judge, and SAM, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 813
Pages: 1583–1583

Head Matter:
Walter C. EWERS, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, Jack Jeter, Plaintiff, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF the COUNTY OF CURRY and Anita C. Merrill and Michael C. Gattis, individually, and in their official capacities as members of the Board of Curry County Commissioners, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees.
Nos. 84-2437, 84-2477.
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
March 13, 1987.
Before HOLLOWAY, Chief Judge, BARRETT, Circuit Judge, and SAM, District Judge.
Of the District of Utah, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
Appellee's petition for rehearing is granted. Judge Barrett voted to deny the petition.
Rehearing is limited to appellee Ewers' challenge to the district court's summary judgment dismissing his claimed property interest. The parties are requested to address this court's discussion of the property interest claim set forth in Ewers v. Board of County Commissioners of Curry County, 802 F.2d 1242, 1250 (10th Cir.1986), and the applicability of Bailey v. Kirk, 777 F.2d 567 (10th Cir.1985).
Appellee Ewers' brief is due March 27, 1987. Appellants' response is due April 10, 1987.