Case Name: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Heffernan
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1991-10-24
Citations: 62 Ohio St. 3d 1208
Docket Number: No. 90-2090
Parties: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Heffernan.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 62
Pages: 1208–1208

Head Matter:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Heffernan.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Heffernan (1991), 62 Ohio St.3d 1208.]
(No. 90-2090
Submitted and decided October 24, 1991.)

Opinion:
On Petition for Reinstatement.
This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Edward A. Heffernan.
The court coming now to consider its order of April 3, 1991, suspending respondent, Edward A. Heffernan, from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of six months pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(7)(c), finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24). Therefore,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that Edward A. Heffernan be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent comply with the registration requirements of Gov.Bar R. VI.
For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Heffernan (1991), 58 Ohio St.3d 260, 569 N.E.2d 1027.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.