Case Name: UNITED FARM WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ARIZONA AGRICULTURAL EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD, et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1984-05-08
Citations: 733 F.2d 78
Docket Number: No. 80-5777
Parties: UNITED FARM WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ARIZONA AGRICULTURAL EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 733
Pages: 78–78

Head Matter:
UNITED FARM WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ARIZONA AGRICULTURAL EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 80-5777.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 8, 1984.
Ellen J. Eggers, Keene, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants.
Neil Vincent Wake, Beus, Gilbert, Wake & Morrill, Phoenix, Ariz., for defendantsappellees.
Before FERGUSON, NELSON, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
The court sitting en banc has affirmed the judgment of the district court that the Arizona Agricultural Employment Relations Act is facially constitutional, 727 F.2d 1475.
The court did not determine whether the Act is constitutional as applied in any specific instance.
The case is remanded to the district court with directions to permit the plaintiffs to amend their complaint to raise any issues not determined by the March 14, 1984 decision of the court sitting en banc.
AFFIRMED AND REMANDED for further proceedings.