Case Name: Kristin OBERHELLMANN, Respondent, v. Elmer OBERHELLMANN, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-11-28
Citations: 910 S.W.2d 837
Docket Number: No. 67459
Parties: Kristin OBERHELLMANN, Respondent, v. Elmer OBERHELLMANN, Appellant.
Judges: Before REINHARD, P.J., KAROHL, J., and RONNIE L. WHITE, Senior Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 910
Pages: 837–837

Head Matter:
Kristin OBERHELLMANN, Respondent, v. Elmer OBERHELLMANN, Appellant.
No. 67459.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Nov. 28, 1995.
Richard E. Schwartz, James E. Parrot, St. Louis, for appellant.
Catalina Margarita Alvarez, Clayton, for respondent.
Before REINHARD, P.J., KAROHL, J., and RONNIE L. WHITE, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Elmer C. Oberhellmann appeals from orders pendente lite and the denial of his motion to extend the time for discovery in this dissolution of marriage action. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by an extended written opinion. The parties have been furnished, for their information only, a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgments of the trial court are affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).