Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Appellant, v. Jai T. SCOTT, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-05-14
Citations: 81 S.W.3d 594
Docket Number: No. WD 59977
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Appellant, v. Jai T. SCOTT, Respondent.
Judges: Before LISA WHITE HARDWICK, Presiding Judge, JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge, and RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 81
Pages: 594–595

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Appellant, v. Jai T. SCOTT, Respondent.
No. WD 59977.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
May 14, 2002.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 2, 2002.
Application for Transfer Denied Aug. 27, 2002.
John Maurice Schilmoeller, Appellate Defender Office, Kansas City, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, John Munson Morris, Sara L. Trow-er, Office of Attorneys General, Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before LISA WHITE HARDWICK, Presiding Judge, JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge, and RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
Appellant Jai T. Scott appeals his conviction of the class A felony of Trafficking in the Second Degree, § 195.223, RSMo 1994. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no prec-edential or jurisprudential value. Howev er, the parties have been furnished -with a memorandum opinion for their information only setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).