Case Name: In re CONFIDENTIAL PARTY
Court: Louisiana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 2016-02-26
Citations: 184 So. 3d 1270
Docket Number: No. 2015-B-2319
Parties: In re CONFIDENTIAL PARTY.
Judges: KNOLL, J., would conditionally reject ■ the consént discipline.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 184
Pages: 1270–1271

Head Matter:
In re CONFIDENTIAL PARTY.
No. 2015-B-2319.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Feb. 26, 2016.

Opinion:
ORDER
[ Considering the Joint Petition for Consent Discipline filed by respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel,
IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Petition for Consent Discipline be and hereby is rejected pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 20. '
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter be remanded for consideration of the previously filed formal charges.
NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA, this 26th day of February, 2016.
FOR THE-COURT:
/s/ John L. Weimer /s/ Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana
KNOLL, J., would conditionally reject the consént discipline.
CLARK, J., would conditionally reject the consent discipline.