Case Name: STATE BANKING BOARD et al. v. FINGER et al.
Court: Texas Courts of Civil Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1924-06-21
Citations: 264 S.W. 151
Docket Number: No. 1051
Parties: STATE BANKING BOARD et al. v. FINGER et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 264
Pages: 151–151

Head Matter:
STATE BANKING BOARD et al. v. FINGER et al.
(No. 1051.)
(Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Beaumont.
June 21, 1924.
Rehearing Denied in Part and Granted in Part July 7, 1924.)
Appeal from District Court, San Jacinto County; J. L. Manry, Judge.
W. A. Keeling, Atty. Gen., and John W. Goodwin and Walace Hawkins, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellants.
Campbell, Myer & Freeman, of Houston, for appellees.

Opinion:
O'QUINN, J.
In this ease the parties plaintiffs and defendants are the same as in cause No. 1050, entitled State Banking Board et al. v. C. C. James et al., 264 S. W. 145, this day decided by this court. The pleadings of the parties and the facts alleged and proven are similar in every detail, and the questions involved are the same as those in cause No. 1050, and the judgment to the sanie effect.
In cause No. 1050 we stated fully the pleadings and facts and discussed and determined the questions of law controlling the case. As the pleadings here are to the same effect as those in cause No. 1050, and the facts constituting the transactions here are of the same nature and to the same effect as those in cause No. 1050, and the questions involved are identical, and the judgment rendered to the same effect as that in cause No. 1050, there is no good reason for an extended statement of the pleadings and facts shown by the record here, nor for a discussion of the questions involved, and for same we here simply refer to our opinion in said cause No. 1050, and because of our holdings in that case the judgment here is reversed and rendered for appellants.
Reversed and rendered.