Case Name: Kim E. FENDER, an individual and National Freezers, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellants, v. The CITY OF MIAMI, a political subdivision of the State of Florida; Sergio Rodriguez, as Director of the Planning, Building, and Zoning Department of the City of Miami; Juan Gonzalez, as Zoning Administrator of the City of Miami; Teresita Fernandez, as Chief, Hearing Boards Division, Planning, Building and Zoning Department of the City of Miami; The City of Miami Zoning Board, a board of the City of Miami and Tarmac Florida, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-01-24
Citations: 666 So. 2d 596
Docket Number: No. 95-3181
Parties: Kim E. FENDER, an individual and National Freezers, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellants, v. The CITY OF MIAMI, a political subdivision of the State of Florida; Sergio Rodriguez, as Director of the Planning, Building, and Zoning Department of the City of Miami; Juan Gonzalez, as Zoning Administrator of the City of Miami; Teresita Fernandez, as Chief, Hearing Boards Division, Planning, Building and Zoning Department of the City of Miami; The City of Miami Zoning Board, a board of the City of Miami and Tarmac Florida, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, COPE and GODERICH, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 666
Pages: 596–597

Head Matter:
Kim E. FENDER, an individual and National Freezers, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellants, v. The CITY OF MIAMI, a political subdivision of the State of Florida; Sergio Rodriguez, as Director of the Planning, Building, and Zoning Department of the City of Miami; Juan Gonzalez, as Zoning Administrator of the City of Miami; Teresita Fernandez, as Chief, Hearing Boards Division, Planning, Building and Zoning Department of the City of Miami; The City of Miami Zoning Board, a board of the City of Miami and Tarmac Florida, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.
No. 95-3181.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan. 24, 1996.
Shubin & Bass and John K. Shubin, Miami, for appellants.
A. Quinn Jones, III and Warren Bittner, Miami; Jorden, Burt, Berenson & Johnson and Frank Burt, Miami, for appellees.
Before BARKDULL, COPE and GODERICH, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Irvine v. Duval County Planning Comm'n, 495 So.2d 167 (Fla.1986), remanded, 504 So.2d 1265 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Shevin ex rel. State v. Public Service Comm'n, 333 So.2d 9 (Fla.1976); Dawson v. Saada, 608 So.2d 806 (Fla.1992), remanded, 612 So.2d 728 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Florida Mining & Materials Corp. v. City of Port Orange, 518 So.2d 311 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987), review denied, 528 So.2d 1181 (Fla.1988); Florida East Coast Ry. Co. v. State Land and Water Adjudicatory Comm'n., 464 So.2d 1361 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); B.S. Enterprises, Inc. v. Dade County, 342 So.2d 117 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).