Case Name: INTERCONDOMINIUM GROUP, INC., Appellant/Cross Appellee, v. Milton F. STEINHARDT and Esther Steinhardt, Appellees/Cross Appellants
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1986-07-09
Citations: 490 So. 2d 1344
Docket Number: No. 85-982
Parties: INTERCONDOMINIUM GROUP, INC., Appellant/Cross Appellee, v. Milton F. STEINHARDT and Esther Steinhardt, Appellees/Cross Appellants.
Judges: DOWNEY and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 490
Pages: 1344–1345

Head Matter:
INTERCONDOMINIUM GROUP, INC., Appellant/Cross Appellee, v. Milton F. STEINHARDT and Esther Steinhardt, Appellees/Cross Appellants.
No. 85-982.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
July 9, 1986.
Rehearing Denied July 31, 1986.
L. Martin Reeder, Jr., of Steel, Hector, Davis, Bums & Middleton, West Palm Beach, for appellant/cross appellee.
Sidney A. Stubbs, Jr., and Marjorie Gada-rian Graham, of Jones & Foster, West Palm Beach, for appellees/cross appellants.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We reverse and remand for a new trial with directions that the trial court consider any additional evidence submitted by either side as to the meaning of paragraph 11 of the lease in issue. We believe that the trial court erred in finding that the provisions of paragraph 11 were unambiguous. At any new trial the parties should also be given the opportunity to present evidence on any other claims or issues raised in the pleadings.
DOWNEY and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.
GLICKSTEIN, J., concurs specialty with opinion.