Case Name: RIVER CITY RESTORATION, INC., Respondent, v. Richard V. NELSON and Joanna R. Nelson, Appellants
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-05-26
Citations: 968 S.W.2d 263
Docket Number: No. 72230
Parties: RIVER CITY RESTORATION, INC., Respondent, v. Richard V. NELSON and Joanna R. Nelson, Appellants.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., P.J., and SIMON and HOFF, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 968
Pages: 263–264

Head Matter:
RIVER CITY RESTORATION, INC., Respondent, v. Richard V. NELSON and Joanna R. Nelson, Appellants.
No. 72230.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
May 26, 1998.
Eugene Portman, Francis E. Pennington, James R. Dankenbring, Clayton, for appellants.
Gregory F. Hoffmann, Clayton, for respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., P.J., and SIMON and HOFF, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Richard V. and Joanna R. Nelson (Nelsons) appeal from judgment in favor of River City Restoration, Inc. (River City). Nelsons argue the court erred in entering judgment: (1) on an improper measure of damages; and (2) denying return of the amount overpaid to River City.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).