Case Name: Dequilla WALKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG SCHOOLS, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-02-22
Citations: 366 F. App'x 459
Docket Number: No. 09-2358
Parties: Dequilla WALKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG SCHOOLS, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before GREGORY and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 366
Pages: 459–460

Head Matter:
Dequilla WALKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG SCHOOLS, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 09-2358.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 10, 2010.
Decided: Feb. 22, 2010.
Dequilla Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Mary H. Crosby, Keith Michael Wedding-ton, Parker, Poe, Adams & Bernstein, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Ap-pellee.
Before GREGORY and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Dequilla Walker appeals a district court order and judgment dismissing her complaint against the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools. We have reviewed the record and the opinion and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See Walker v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools, No. 3:09-cv-00035-RJC-DCK, 2009 WL 3762971 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 9, 2009). We also find the magistrate judge did not abuse his discretion in denying Walker's motion to amend the complaint. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED