Case Name: OMNI HOME FINANCING, INC., A California Corporation; Keith W. Murphy, An Individual; Anthony A. Gaglione, An Individual; David A. Bancroft, An Individual; Omni Home Financing, Inc. 412(I) Defined Benefit Plan, an Employee Benefits Plan Under Erisa, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation; Paul Bannock, an Individual, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-02-23
Citations: 367 F. App'x 792
Docket Number: No. 08-56431
Parties: OMNI HOME FINANCING, INC., A California Corporation; Keith W. Murphy, An Individual; Anthony A. Gaglione, An Individual; David A. Bancroft, An Individual; Omni Home Financing, Inc. 412(I) Defined Benefit Plan, an Employee Benefits Plan Under Erisa, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation; Paul Bannock, an Individual, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: THOMAS and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges, and BEISTLINE, Chief District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 367
Pages: 792–793

Head Matter:
OMNI HOME FINANCING, INC., A California Corporation; Keith W. Murphy, An Individual; Anthony A. Gaglione, An Individual; David A. Bancroft, An Individual; Omni Home Financing, Inc. 412(I) Defined Benefit Plan, an Employee Benefits Plan Under Erisa, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation; Paul Bannock, an Individual, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 08-56431.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Feb. 23, 2010.
Marc Schechter, Esquire, Susan Meter, Esquire, Butterfield Schechter LLP, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
Dan Marmalefsky, David Frank McDowell, Jr., Esquire, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
D.C. No. 3:06-ev-00921-IEG-JMA, Southern District of California, San Diego.
Before: THOMAS and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges, and BEISTLINE, Chief District Judge.
The Honorable Ralph R. Beistline, United States District Judge for the District of Alaska, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
ORDER
Pursuant to stipulation by the parties, and for good cause shown, this case is dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear their respective costs and attorneys' fees. A certified copy of this order sent to the district court shall constitute the mandate.