Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stacie E. LEIPOLD, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-12-15
Citations: 671 F. App'x 763
Docket Number: No. 15-15683 Non-Argument Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stacie E. LEIPOLD, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before ROSENBAUM, JULIE CARNES and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 671
Pages: 763–763

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stacie E. LEIPOLD, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-15683 Non-Argument Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Date Filed: 12/15/2016
Michelle Lee Schieber, Danial Edward Bennett, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Macon, GA, Melvin E. Hyde, Jr., Michael J. Moore, U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Columbus, txA, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Tim Saviello, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Columbus, GA, Christina Lee Hunt, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Macon, GA, Stacie E. Leipold, FCI Tallahassee— Inmate Legal Mail, Tallahassee, FL, for Defendant-Appellant
Before ROSENBAUM, JULIE CARNES and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Jonathan Dodson, appointed counsel for Stacie E. Leipold in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Leipold's conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.