Case Name: In the Matter of Robert McKeown, Appellant, v. Glenn Goord, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional Services, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1999-10-28
Citations: 265 A.D.2d 760
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Robert McKeown, Appellant, v Glenn Goord, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 265
Pages: 760–760

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Robert McKeown, Appellant, v Glenn Goord, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional Services, Respondent.
[697 NYS2d 708]

Opinion:
—Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Teresi, J.), entered November 20, 1998 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent denying his request for merit time allowance.
Petitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging respondent's determination finding that petitioner was not eligible for merit time allowance (see, Correction Law § 803 [3]) due to his "refusal to participate in programs/treatment recommended by department staff". Supreme Court dismissed the petition on the ground that petitioner failed to exhaust his administrative remedies in that he did not file a grievance with respect to the denial of merit time. Petitioner appeals.
Respondent concedes, and we agree, that inasmuch as the record indicates that petitioner had inquired into the review process and was informed that there was no grievance procedure available, it was error to dismiss the petition for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Accordingly, the matter should be remitted to Supreme Court to address the merits.
Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Spain, Carpinello and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the facts, without costs, petition reinstated and matter remitted to the Supreme Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court's decision.