Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Ines MARTINEZ-VARGAS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-03-22
Citations: 682 F. App'x 348
Docket Number: No. 16-41001 Summary Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Ines MARTINEZ-VARGAS, Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 682
Pages: 348–349

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Ines MARTINEZ-VARGAS, Defendant-Appellant
No. 16-41001 Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed March 22, 2017
Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Jose Ines Martinez-Vargas, Pro Se
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Ines Martinez-Vargas has moved for leave to -withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (6th Cir. 2011). Martinez-Vargas has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 6th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.