Case Name: The Public National Bank of New York, Respondent, v. Rotterdamsche Bankvereeniging, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1926-10
Citations: 218 A.D. 701
Docket Number: 
Parties: The Public National Bank of New York, Respondent, v. Rotterdamsche Bankvereeniging, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 218
Pages: 701–701

Head Matter:
The Public National Bank of New York, Respondent, v. Rotterdamsche Bankvereeniging, Appellant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The complaint as we view it is based upon the theory of one contract. So construing it, the order appealed from is correct and should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to defendant to answer upon payment of said costs and ten dollars costs of motion at Special Term. Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Merrell, McAvoy and Burr, JJ. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendant to answer within twenty days from service of order upon payment of said costs and ten dollars costs of motion at Special Term.