Case Name: Eddie INGRAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sergeant GRIFFIN, Shift Commander; Correctional Officer Kepler, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-03-02
Citations: 220 F. App'x 170
Docket Number: No. 05-7779
Parties: Eddie INGRAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sergeant GRIFFIN, Shift Commander; Correctional Officer Kepler, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 220
Pages: 170–170

Head Matter:
Eddie INGRAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sergeant GRIFFIN, Shift Commander; Correctional Officer Kepler, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 05-7779.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 14, 2007.
Decided: March 2, 2007.
Eddie Ingram, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Eddie Ingram appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record, considered the Supreme Court's recent decision in Jones v. Bock, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 910, 166 L.Ed.2d 798 (2007), and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ingram v. Griffin, No. CA-05-622-2 (E.D.Va. Oct. 21, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.