Case Name: L. Seville PARKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert CHAMBLISS; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-10-06
Citations: 399 F. App'x 208
Docket Number: No. 08-16215
Parties: L. Seville PARKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert CHAMBLISS; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 399
Pages: 208–209

Head Matter:
L. Seville PARKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert CHAMBLISS; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 08-16215.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 13, 2010.
Filed Oct. 6, 2010.
L. Seville Parks, ELY, NV, pro se.
Kristen R. Geddes, Deputy Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General, Carson City, NV, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
L. Seville Parks, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to comply with a court order to amend his complaint. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 640 (9th Cir.2002). We affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Parks's action for failure to comply with a court order where the district court described the inadequacies of Parks's complaint and gave him ample time to amend, and Parks failed to pursue the case for over six months without providing any reason for the delay. See id. at 642-43.
Parks's remaining contentions are unpersuasive.
To the extent that there are any outstanding motions, they are denied.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.