Case Name: Will Claybrook v. The State
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1923-04-04
Citations: 95 Tex. Crim. 88
Docket Number: No. 7163
Parties: Will Claybrook v. The State.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Criminal Reports
Volume: 95
Pages: 88–90

Head Matter:
Will Claybrook v. The State.
No. 7163.
Decided April 4, 1923.
1. —Transporting Intoxicating Liquor — Companion Case.
Where the facts are identical and the legal questions the same as raised in the companion case, and there settled adversely to appellant’s contention, the judgment must be affirmed.
2. —Same—Rehearing—Confession—Arrest—Motion for New Trial. .
If there be anything in the record presenting objection to any testimony claimed to be in the nature of a confession, this court has been unable to find it, and there was nothng to show that the appellant was under arrest and unwarned, and there was no error; besdes, questions raised only in the motion for a new trial will not be considered in the absence of a bill of exceptions.
Appeal from the District Court of Kuox. Tried below before the Honorable J. H. Milam.
Appeal from a conviction of transporting intoxicating liquor; penalty, one and one-half years imprisonment in the penitentiary.
The opinion states the case.
A. G. Nicholson and Cecil Storey, for appellant.
R. G. Storey, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Opinion:
HAWKINS, Judge.
— Conviction is for the unlawful transportation of intoxicating liquors with a punishment of one and one-half years confinement in the penitentiary.
This is a companion ease to Land v. State, 93 Texas Crim. Rep., 470, and Glover v. State, 94 Texas Crim. Rep., —, both reported in 247 S. W. Rep., on pages 554 and 556. The facts are identical, and the legal questions the same as raised in Land's case, and there settled adversely to appellant's contention. The objection to certain testimony as being violative of the statute on confessions (Code Cr. Proc. Art. 810) which called for reversal of Glover's case was not raised in the instant one, leaving this in all respects like Land's and demands a similar disposition.
The judgment is accordingly affirmed.
Affirmed.