Case Name: FULLER v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1931-04-01
Citations: 37 S.W.2d 1037
Docket Number: No. 14213
Parties: FULLER v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 37
Pages: 1037–1037

Head Matter:
FULLER v. STATE.
No. 14213.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
April 1, 1931.
Rehearing Denied April 29, 1931.
J. S. Bracewell and Chas. B. Spiner, both of Houston, for appellant.
O’Brien Stevens, Cr. Dist. Atty., and E. T. Branch, both of Houston, and Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
CHRISTIAN, J.
The offense is robbery; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for five years.
The record is before us without a statement of facts. In the absence of a statement of facts we find one question calling for review. Appellant filed a motion to quash the indictment on the ground that the check alleged to have been taken from the injured party was not sufficiently described. An examination of the indictment discloses that the description of the check is .substantially the same as that contained in the indictment in the case of Freddie Fuller v. State (Tex.. Cr. App.) 37 S.W.(2d) 1034, this day decided. In that case we held the description sufficient.
The judgment is affirmed.
PER CURIAM.
The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.