Case Name: Rupert Cash, Respondent, v. Hector Abraham, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2013-04-03
Citations: 105 A.D.3d 690
Docket Number: 
Parties: Rupert Cash, Respondent, v Hector Abraham, Appellant.
Judges: Angiolillo, J.E, Balkin, Austin and Miller, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 105
Pages: 690–690

Head Matter:
Rupert Cash, Respondent, v Hector Abraham, Appellant.
[961 NYS2d 593]

Opinion:
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bayne, J), dated September 14, 2012, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The defendant met his prima facie burden of showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345 [2002]; Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). The defendant submitted competent medical evidence establishing, prima facie, that the alleged injuries to the lumbar region of the plaintiffs spine and to his right knee did not constitute serious injuries within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see Staff v Yshua, 59 AD3d 614 [2009]).
In opposition, however, the plaintiff submitted evidence raising triable issues of fact as to whether he sustained a serious injury to the lumbar region of his spine (see Perl v Meher, 18 NY3d 208, 218-219 [2011]). Thus, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Angiolillo, J.E, Balkin, Austin and Miller, JJ., concur.