Case Name: Earl Reece MUNDAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1987-10-07
Citations: 513 So. 2d 764
Docket Number: No. BO-253
Parties: Earl Reece MUNDAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SMITH, C.J., and WENTWORTH and JOANOS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 513
Pages: 764–765

Head Matter:
Earl Reece MUNDAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. BO-253.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Oct. 7, 1987.
T. Whitney Strickland, Jr., Tallahassee, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Gregory G. Costas, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant appeals raising several issues, only one of which merits discussion. In sentencing appellant, the trial court departed from the recommended range of the guidelines, giving as one of its reasons appellant's status as a habitual offender. Subsequently, the Florida Supreme Court declared this to be an invalid reason for departure in Whitehead v. State, 498 So.2d 863 (Fla.1986). Accordingly, the cause is remanded to the trial court for resentenc-ing. Albritton v. State, 476 So.2d 158 (Fla.1985).
SMITH, C.J., and WENTWORTH and JOANOS, JJ., concur.