Case Name: TUTTLE et al. v. GUADALUPE-BLANCO RIVER AUTHORITY et al.
Court: Supreme Court of Texas
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1943-10-27
Citations: 174 S.W.2d 589
Docket Number: No. 16180
Parties: TUTTLE et al. v. GUADALUPE-BLANCO RIVER AUTHORITY et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 174
Pages: 589–589

Head Matter:
TUTTLE et al. v. GUADALUPE-BLANCO RIVER AUTHORITY et al.
No. 16180.
Supreme Court of Texas.
Oct. 27, 1943.
Brewer, Matthews, Nowlin & Macfar-lane, of San Antonio, for petitioners.
E. M. Cape and Tom G. Oliver, Jr., both of San Marcos, Fred H. Blundell, of Lock-hart, and D. W. Glasscock, W. S. Gideon, and A. J. Wirtz, all of Austin, for respondents.

Opinion:
CRITZ, Justice.
At a former day in this term of court we "Refused For Want of Merit" application for writ of error No. 27098, filed by the above-named petitioners against the above-named respondents. Such application for writ of error is now before us on motion for rehearing filed by the petitioners in the application. Such motion is No. 16180.
We "Refused For Want of Merit" the application for writ of error in this case because we were of the opinion that the Court of Civil Appeals correctly held that the plaintiffs who brought this suit in the district court were, and are, without lawful authority to bring or maintain the same. We are still of that opinion. Since we hold that the parties who brought this suit were, and are, without authority to bring or maintain it, we do not consider it proper for us to express an opinion on its merits. We therefore do not do so.
It is ordered that the motion for rehearing above mentioned be, and the same is hereby, overruled.