Case Name: CITY OF JACKSON, Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Randolph C. FARRAR and Mary C. Farrar, Defendants/Appellants
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-06-30
Citations: 26 S.W.3d 334
Docket Number: No. ED 75920
Parties: CITY OF JACKSON, Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Randolph C. FARRAR and Mary C. Farrar, Defendants/Appellants.
Judges: Before MARY RHODES RUSSELL, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 26
Pages: 334–335

Head Matter:
CITY OF JACKSON, Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Randolph C. FARRAR and Mary C. Farrar, Defendants/Appellants.
No. ED 75920.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Southern Division.
June 30, 2000.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 24, 2000.
Application for Transfer Denied Oct. 3, 2000.
Walter S. Drusch, Jr., Lowes & Drusch Law Office, Cape Girardeau, for appellant.
Mary Eftink Boner, Jackson, for respondent.
Before MARY RHODES RUSSELL, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Randolph and Mary Farrar (collectively Appellants) appeal a Special Judgment ordering them to pay the City of Jackson a special tax bill in the amount of $6,185.09, including interest, attorney fees and court costs, for the paving of Gloria Street. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's ruling was not against the weight of the evidence. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).