Case Name: In the Matter of the Viguerie Company, Appellant, v. Basil A. Paterson, as Secretary of State of the State of New York, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1984-06-07
Citations: 62 N.Y.2d 871
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Viguerie Company, Appellant, v Basil A. Paterson, as Secretary of State of the State of New York, Respondent.
Judges: Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 62
Pages: 871–873

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Viguerie Company, Appellant, v Basil A. Paterson, as Secretary of State of the State of New York, Respondent.
Argued May 7, 1984;
decided June 7, 1984
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Stuart A. Jackson, Ronald L. Mayers and Thadd A. Blizzard for appellant.
Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (.Ronald Cohen, Peter H. Schiff and Daniel L. Kurtz of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (94 AD2d 672), to which we add, the inhibiting effect of which petitioner complains is precisely what the Legislature intended and is well within its police power.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.