Case Name: Miguel LAGO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-07-02
Citations: 582 So. 2d 118
Docket Number: No. 90-1334
Parties: Miguel LAGO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before HUBBART, COPE, and GERSTEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 582
Pages: 118–119

Head Matter:
Miguel LAGO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 90-1334.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 2, 1991.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Maria Brea Lipinski, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Patricia Ann Ash, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before HUBBART, COPE, and GERSTEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Miguel Lago, appeals his sentences for robbery with a firearm, unlawful possession of a firearm while engaged in a criminal offense, and grand theft. We affirm.
Appellant's sole contention on appeal is that the trial court erred in sentencing appellant to a term in excess of the sentencing guidelines. We find no error.
The trial court gave written contemporaneous reasons for appellant's departure sentence. At least three of the four given reasons were valid. See Brown v. State, 569 So.2d 1223 (Fla.1990); State v. Jones, 530 So.2d 53 (Fla.1988); Evans v. State, 528 So.2d 125 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Braggs v. State, 522 So.2d 536 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Keys v. State, 500 So.2d 134 (Fla.1986); see also Lipscomb v. State, 573 So.2d 429 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).
Affirmed.
HUBBART and GERSTEN, JJ., concur.