Case Name: Rickey W. BOMAR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HOKE, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-08-22
Citations: 195 F. App'x 129
Docket Number: No. 06-1274
Parties: Rickey W. BOMAR, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. HOKE, INCORPORATED, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 195
Pages: 129–130

Head Matter:
Rickey W. BOMAR, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. HOKE, INCORPORATED, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 06-1274.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 7, 2006.
Decided: Aug. 22, 2006.
Rickey W. Bomar, Appellant Pro Se. Wade Edward Ballard, Matthew J. Gilley, Ford & Harrison, LLP, Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Rickey W. Bomar seeks to appeal from the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge in part and dismissing Bomar's complaint without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Because Bomar could remedy his complaint's dismissal by amending the complaint to clarify his claims and the basis for federal jurisdiction, the district court's order is not reviewable. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1067 (4th Cir.1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.