Case Name: KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION, Movant v. Clinton Chadwell CARTER KBA Member No. 90756, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Kentucky
Jurisdiction: Kentucky
Decision Date: 2016-08-25
Citations: 493 S.W.3d 840
Docket Number: 2016-SC-000261-KB
Parties: KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION, Movant v. Clinton Chadwell CARTER KBA Member No. 90756, Respondent
Judges: All sitting. All concur.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 493
Pages: 840–840

Head Matter:
KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION, Movant v. Clinton Chadwell CARTER KBA Member No. 90756, Respondent
2016-SC-000261-KB
Supreme Court of Kentucky.
August 25, 2016.

Opinion:
OPINION AND ORDER
Respondent, Clinton Chadwell Carter, was admitted to the practice of law in the Commonwealth, of. Kentucky on June 16, 2005. His bar roster address is 200 S. Lawrence St., Montgomery, AL 36104, and his Kentucky Bar Association (KBA) member number is 90756.
As explained in an order of Public Censure entered April 15, 2016, the Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Tennessee found:
[the Respondent] engaged in thé unauthorized practice of law by representing a client in Tennessee after his license had béen administratively suspended. [Respondent] failed to file á certificate of good faith in a medical malpractice action he filed which was fatal to the case. [Respondent] failed to inform his client of the dismissal of the lawsuit for a period- of over six months.
The Court found Respondent guilty of the following violations of the Tennessee Rules of Professional Conduct: 1.1 (requirement to provide competent representation); 1.4 (requirement to promptly provide the client with necessary information and promptly respond to the client's reasonable requests for information); 3.1 (requiring reasonable due diligence prior to filing and/or defending a claim); 5.5 (illegally engaging in the practice of law); 8.4(a) (requirement that an attorney not violate nor attempt to violate the rules of professional conduct); and 8.4(d) (engaging in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice).
In its order of Public Censure, the Supreme Court of Tennessee imposed a public reprimand. Pursuant to SCR 3.435(4), Respondent is subject to identical reciprocal discipline in the Commonwealth of Kentucky unless he proves by substantial evidence: (a) a lack of jurisdiction or fraud in the Tennessee disciplinary action, or (b) that his misconduct warrants substantially different discipline in this Commonwealth.
On May 20, 2016, the KBA filed a petition for reciprocal discipline pursuant to SCR 3.435. On May 24, 2016, this Court ordered the following:
Within twenty (20) days of the date of the entry of this order, Respondent is ordered to show cause why he should not be publicly reprimanded, as consistent with an order of identical discipline from the Supreme Court of Tennessee.
Respondent failed to comply with the May-24, 2016, order.
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that Respondent, Clinton Chadwell Carter, KBA Member Number 90756, is publicly reprimanded, as consistent with an order of identical discipline from the Supreme Court of Tennessee, effective from the entry of this opinion and order.
/s/ John D. Minton, Jr. CHIEF JUSTICE
All sitting. All concur.