Case Name: George MARTIN, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1929-06-06
Citations: 33 F.2d 1022
Docket Number: No. 18
Parties: George MARTIN, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error.
Judges: Before COTTERAL, PHILLIPS, and MeDERMOTT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 33
Pages: 1022–1022

Head Matter:
George MARTIN, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
June 6, 1929.
No. 18.
George Martin, pro se.
Frank Lee, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Muskogee, Okl.
Before COTTERAL, PHILLIPS, and MeDERMOTT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The order of the District Court, overruling the motion of the plaintiff in error for a consideration of his special plea of limitations to .the indictment, and for a vacation of the judgment in this cause, is affirmed, on the authority of Martin v. Biddle (C. C. A.) 16 F.(2d) 118, and U. S. v. Mayer, 235 U. S. 55, 35 S. Ct. 16, 59 L. Ed. 129.
Affirmed.