Case Name: In the Interest of: L.R., Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-04-10
Citations: 559 So. 2d 389
Docket Number: No. 88-1862
Parties: In the Interest of: L.R., Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before BASKIN, FERGUSON and GERSTEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 559
Pages: 389–389

Head Matter:
In the Interest of: L.R., Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 88-1862.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 10, 1990.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Robin W. Faber, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Mark Dunn, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before BASKIN, FERGUSON and GERSTEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The state having failed to establish a prima facie case against L.R. and having failed to exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence, Jaramillo v. State, 417 So.2d 257 (Fla.1982); J.W. v. State, 467 So.2d 796 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); P.R. v. State, 460 So.2d 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), we reverse the adjudication of delinquency for grand theft of an automobile and the order of restitution; we remand with directions to discharge appellant.
Reversed and remanded.