Case Name: Carl J. HACH, Appellant, v. Marty C. ANDERSON, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-08-08
Citations: 191 F. App'x 511
Docket Number: No. 05-2379
Parties: Carl J. HACH, Appellant, v. Marty C. ANDERSON, Appellee.
Judges: Before MURPHY, BYE, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 191
Pages: 511–512

Head Matter:
Carl J. HACH, Appellant, v. Marty C. ANDERSON, Appellee.
No. 05-2379.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 3, 2006.
Decided: Aug. 8, 2006.
Carl J. Hach, Sandstone, MN, pro se.
Paul Anthony Murphy, Richard New-berry, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Minneapolis, MN, for Appellee.
Before MURPHY, BYE, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
[UNPUBLISHED]
PER CURIAM.
Federal inmate Carl J. Hach appeals the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, in which he challenged two prison disciplinary violations and the resulting loss of good-time credit. The district court held that the finding of guilt on the first violation was supported by some evidence, and that Hach had procedurally defaulted his challenge to the second violation by not timely exhausting his administrative remedies. After carefully reviewing the record and the parties' submissions on appeal, we conclude the district court's judgment was correct. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Susan Richard Nelson, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.