Case Name: Teresa NELSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHOCTAW COUNTY CITY OF HUGO HOSPITAL Authority a/k/a Choctaw Memorial Hospital and Rural Healthcare of Oklahoma, Inc. a/k/a Lane Frost Health and Rehabilitation Center, Defendants-Appellees
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 2013-06-27
Citations: 304 P.3d 745
Docket Number: No. 110,734
Parties: Teresa NELSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHOCTAW COUNTY CITY OF HUGO HOSPITAL Authority a/k/a Choctaw Memorial Hospital and Rural Healthcare of Oklahoma, Inc. a/k/a Lane Frost Health and Rehabilitation Center, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: COLBERT, C.J., REIF, V.C.J., KAUGER, WATT, EDMONDSON, COMBS, GURICH, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Pacific Reporter 3d
Volume: 304
Pages: 745–745

Head Matter:
2013 OK 58
Teresa NELSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHOCTAW COUNTY CITY OF HUGO HOSPITAL Authority a/k/a Choctaw Memorial Hospital and Rural Healthcare of Oklahoma, Inc. a/k/a Lane Frost Health and Rehabilitation Center, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 110,734.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
June 27, 2013.

Opinion:
ORDER OF SUMMARY DISPOSITION
T1 Rule 1.201 of the Oklahoma Supreme Court Rules provides that "[iln any case in which it appears that a prior controlling appellate decision is dispositive of the appeal, the court may summarily affirm or reverse, citing in its order of summary disposition this rule and the controlling decision." Okla. S.Ct. Rule 1.201.
2 After reviewing the record in this case, THE COURT FINDS that our recent decisions in Wall v. Marouk, 2013 OK 36, 302 P.3d 775 and Douglas v. Cox Retirement Properties, 2013 OK 37, 302 P.3d 789, dispose of the issues in this case.
13 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the trial court's dismissal of this case is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings. DONE BY ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT IN CONFERENCE THIS 27th day of June, 2018.
COLBERT, C.J., REIF, V.C.J., KAUGER, WATT, EDMONDSON, COMBS, GURICH, JJ., concur.
WINCHESTER & TAYLOR, JJ., dissent.