Case Name: In re Born Islam RUSH, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-11-16
Citations: 622 F. App'x 187
Docket Number: No. 15-3029
Parties: In re Born Islam RUSH, Petitioner.
Judges: Before: McKEE, Chief Judge, GARTH and BARRY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 622
Pages: 187–187

Head Matter:
In re Born Islam RUSH, Petitioner.
No. 15-3029.
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R.App. P. Sept. 3, 2015.
Filed: Nov. 16, 2015.
Born Islam Rush, Fairton FCI, Fairton, NJ, pro se.
Before: McKEE, Chief Judge, GARTH and BARRY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
OPINION
PER CURIAM.
Pro se petitioner Born Rush filed a petition for writ of mandamus requesting that we direct the District Court to rule upon his then-pending petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Soon thereafter, the District Court disposed of Rush's § 2241 petition, dismissing it in part and denying it in part. Because the District Court granted Rush the relief he requested in his mandamus petition — a decision on his § 2241 petition — his mandamus petition has been rendered moot. See, e.g., Blanciak v. Allegheny Ludlum Corp., 77 F.3d 690, 698-99 (3d Cir.1996). Accordingly, we will dismiss Rush's mandamus petition.
This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent.