Case Name: Francis Dent, App'lt, v. The Society of the Friars Minor of the Order of St. Francis, Resp't
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1891-12-14
Citations: 41 N.Y. St. Rep. 472
Docket Number: 
Parties: Francis Dent, App’lt, v. The Society of the Friars Minor of the Order of St. Francis, Resp’t.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 41
Pages: 472–472

Head Matter:
Francis Dent, App’lt, v. The Society of the Friars Minor of the Order of St. Francis, Resp’t.
(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department,
Filed December 14, 1891.)
Depositions—Intebbogatobies.
Questions not pertinent or relevant to the issue should not be permitted to be inserted in the interrogatories to be annexed to a commission.
Appeal from order disallowing certain cross-interrogatories to witnesses to be examined on commission at Rome, Italy.
Francis Dent, app’lt in person; Bliss & Schley, for resp’t

Opinion:
Dykman, J.
This is an appeal from an order of the special term disallowing certain. cross-interrogatories to witnesses to be examined on commission at Rome, in Italy.
The action is for the recovery of damages for the deprivation of the plaintiff of his support and maintenance as a priest and of his rights and privileges as a member of the Custodia of Buffalo of the Order of Friars Minor of the Strict Observance, incorporated as the Society of Friars Minor of the Order of St. Francis, and a perusal of the pleadings shows plainly that the rejected interrogatories are immaterial to any question which can be litigated upon the trial of this action.
Under the provisions of the Code either party must be allowed to insert in the interrogatories to be annexed to a commission for the examination of witnesses any question pertinent to the issue which he proposes, and the converse of this rule is easily deduced, that a party must not be allowed to insert in such interrogatories any question not pertinent to the issue.
It is true the question of relevancy and materiality might be reserved until the trial, but it is equally true that impertinent and irrelevant interrogatories should never be propounded.
An examination of the questions disallowed at the special term shows them to be objectionable in many respects, and we thinlc they were properly rejected. ,
The order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Barnard, P. J., and Pratt, J., concur.