Case Name: William Garlock, App'lt, v. Samuel Markham, Resp't
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1890-04-11
Citations: 31 N.Y. St. Rep. 263
Docket Number: 
Parties: William Garlock, App’lt, v. Samuel Markham, Resp’t.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 31
Pages: 263–268

Head Matter:
William Garlock, App’lt, v. Samuel Markham, Resp’t.
(Supreme Court, General Term, Fifth Department,
Filed April 11, 1890.)
Negotiable paper—Fraud—Bona ride holder.
In an action upon a note made upon the purchase by defendant of Bohemian oats, upon fraudulent representations, and which had been purchased by plaintiff before maturity for value, the evidence was conflicting as to whether plaintiff knew of the fraud at the time of the purchase, but there was evidence to show that he had frequently stated that the whole scheme was a fraud. Meld, that a verdict for defendant would not be disturbed.
(Corlett, J., dissents).
Appeal from judgment in favor of defendant, entered upon a verdict, and from order denying motion for a new trial.
Action upon a promissory note made by defendant.
The facts appear in the opinion of Judge Corlett.
Garloch & Beach, for app’lt; John Desmond, for resp’t

Opinion:
Per Curiam
Judgment and order appealed from affirmed. See memorandum in case of Matson v. Blossom, ante, 228.
Dwight, P. J., and Macomber, J., concur.