Case Name: Alecia Y. FARLEY; Marvin A. Farley, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; Bank of America, N.A., as Successor by Merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-09-11
Citations: 615 F. App'x 804
Docket Number: No. 15-1733
Parties: Alecia Y. FARLEY; Marvin A. Farley, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; Bank of America, N.A., as Successor by Merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 615
Pages: 804–804

Head Matter:
Alecia Y. FARLEY; Marvin A. Farley, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; Bank of America, N.A., as Successor by Merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15-1733.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 9, 2015.
Decided: Sept. 11, 2015.
Alecia Y. Farley; Marvin A. Farley, Appellants Pro Se. Michael T. Hosmer, McGuirewoods, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina; Jontille Dionne Ray, McGuire-woods, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Ap-pellees.
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Alecia Y. Farley and Marvin A. Farley appeal the district court's order denying certain pretrial motions and a final order granting Defendants' motions to dismiss the Farleys' civil complaint and to impose non-monetary sanctions, namely, a prefil-ing injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Farley v. Bank of Am., N.A., No. 3:14-cv-00568-JRS, 2015 WL 3651165 (E.D. Va. Oct. 28, 2014; June 11, 2015). We grant the Farleys' motion to file a corrected informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.