Case Name: Randy WILLIAMS; Mary Williams, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. APAC ATLANTIC, INC.; APAC, Inc.; APAC Carolina Inc., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-06-24
Citations: 384 F. App'x 264
Docket Number: No. 10-1237
Parties: Randy WILLIAMS; Mary Williams, Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. APAC ATLANTIC, INC.; APAC, Inc.; APAC Carolina Inc., Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 384
Pages: 264–265

Head Matter:
Randy WILLIAMS; Mary Williams, Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. APAC ATLANTIC, INC.; APAC, Inc.; APAC Carolina Inc., Defendants—Appellees.
No. 10-1237.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 17, 2010.
Decided: June 24, 2010.
Randy Williams, Mary Williams, Appellants Pro Se. Clayton Monroe Custer, Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Randy and Mary Williams appeal the district court's order granting summary judgment to the Defendants on the Williams's civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Plaintiffs' motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. APAC Atlantic, Inc., No. 3:08-cv-03432-JFA, 2010 WL 569735 (D.S.C. Feb. 11, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.