Case Name: HOOD v. WALLACE
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1899-10-30
Citations: 97 F. 983
Docket Number: No. 1,222
Parties: HOOD v. WALLACE.
Judges: Before CALDWELL, SANBORN, and THAYER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter
Volume: 97
Pages: 983–983

Head Matter:
HOOD v. WALLACE.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
October 30, 1899.)
No. 1,222.
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Kansas.
For opinion below, see 89 Fed. 11. C. N.
Sterry (Eugene Hagan and I. E. Lambert, on the brief), for plaintiff in error.
W. C. Cochran (J. McD. Trimble and W. H. Wallace, on the brief), for defendant in error.
Before CALDWELL, SANBORN, and THAYER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
THAYER, Circuit Judge.
This case was submitted at the same time, by the same counsel, on the same argument, and involves the same questions, which have been considered and decided in the preceding case of Lantry v. Wallace (C. C. A.) 97 Fed. 865. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment in the ease in hand is affirmed; Judge SANBORN dissenting.