Case Name: Lawrence TUCKER, JR., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2004-12-29
Citations: 889 So. 2d 1010
Docket Number: No. 2D03-3786
Parties: Lawrence TUCKER, JR., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ALTENBERND, C.J., and FULMER and WHATLEY, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 889
Pages: 1010–1011

Head Matter:
Lawrence TUCKER, JR., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D03-3786.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Dec. 29, 2004.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and William L. Sharwell, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and C. Suzanne Bechard, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Ap-pellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Lawrence Tucker, Jr., appeals an order revoking his probation. His attorney filed an Anders brief, noting only one minor issue of merit in that the order of revoca tion includes grounds for revocation that were not announced by the trial court. The affidavit of violation filed in all of Mr. Tucker's pending trial court cases alleged thirteen different violations, but the trial court focused on one new law violation at the hearing. The written order of revocation erroneously lists all thirteen violations when the oral pronouncement concerned only condition five. Accordingly, we affirm the order of violation and the resulting sentences, but order the trial court to strike all conditions referenced in the order of revocation except for condition five.
Affirmed with instructions.
ALTENBERND, C.J., and FULMER and WHATLEY, JJ., Concur.
. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).