Case Name: Samuel Friedman vs. Rachael Friedman
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1929-11-25
Citations: 110 Conn. 696
Docket Number: 
Parties: Samuel Friedman vs. Rachael Friedman.
Judges: Wheels®, C. J., Maltbie, Haines, Hinman and Banks, Js.
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 110
Pages: 696–697

Head Matter:
Samuel Friedman vs. Rachael Friedman.
First Judicial District, Hartford,
October Term, 1929.
Wheels®, C. J., Maltbie, Haines, Hinman and Banks, Js.
Argued October 1st
decided November 25th, 1929.
James B. Henry, for the appellant (plaintiff).
Aaron Nassau, with whom, on the brief, was Francis P. Rohrmayer, for the appellee (defendant).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This is an action brought by the plaintiff to compel the defendant, his wife, to account for certain sums of money and the proceeds of certain notes which he claims to have delivered to her for safekeeping. The finding disproves his claim that any of these sums or the notes were given to the defendant under circumstances such that she is under a legal liability to account for them. He seeks many corrections in the finding, but none of the changes sought which would have a material bearing upon the question of the defendant's liability can be granted.
There is no error.