Case Name: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Deona EMBRY, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-11-14
Citations: 588 So. 2d 995
Docket Number: No. 76199
Parties: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Deona EMBRY, Respondent.
Judges: SHAW, C.J. and OVERTON, McDonald, barkett, grimes, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 588
Pages: 995–995

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Deona EMBRY, Respondent.
No. 76199.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Nov. 14, 1991.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Stephen A. Baker, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for petitioner.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender and Andrea Norgard, Asst. Public Defender, Tenth Judicial Circuit, Bartow, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have for review State v. Embry, 563 So.2d 147 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990), which certified the same question answered by this Court in Hunter v. State, 586 So.2d 319 (Fla. 1991). The opinion under review is quashed, and we remand this cause for reconsideration in light of Hunter.
It is so ordered.
SHAW, C.J. and OVERTON, McDonald, barkett, grimes, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.