Case Name: Dino DiCienzo et al., Respondents, v. Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency, Respondent. The Niagara Venture, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2009-06-05
Citations: 63 A.D.3d 1664
Docket Number: Appeal No. 2
Parties: Dino DiCienzo et al., Respondents, v Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency, Respondent. The Niagara Venture, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 63
Pages: 1664–1664

Head Matter:
Dino DiCienzo et al., Respondents, v Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency, Respondent. The Niagara Venture, Appellant.
(Appeal No. 2.)
[879 NYS2d 745]

Opinion:
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Richard C. Kloch, Sr., A.J.), entered June 23, 2008. The order denied the motion of The Niagara Venture for leave to reargue or renew the denial of its motion to intervene.
It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.
Same memorandum as in DiCienzo v Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency (63 AD3d 1663 [2009]). Present—Centra, J.P, Peradotto, Pine and Gorski, JJ.