Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. William GUTIERREZ, also known as Jose Ubence Gutierrez, also known as Jose Gutierrez, also known as Jose Ubence-Gutierrez, also known as Enrique Medina, also known as William Guiterrez, also known as Jose U. Gutierrez, also known as Alexes Gutierrez, also known as William Venturta-Gutierrez, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-01-05
Citations: 674 F. App'x 393
Docket Number: No. 15-20595 Summary Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. William GUTIERREZ, also known as Jose Ubence Gutierrez, also known as Jose Gutierrez, also known as Jose Ubence-Gutierrez, also known as Enrique Medina, also known as William Guiterrez, also known as Jose U. Gutierrez, also known as Alexes Gutierrez, also known as William Venturta-Gutierrez, Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 674
Pages: 393–393

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. William GUTIERREZ, also known as Jose Ubence Gutierrez, also known as Jose Gutierrez, also known as Jose Ubence-Gutierrez, also known as Enrique Medina, also known as William Guiterrez, also known as Jose U. Gutierrez, also known as Alexes Gutierrez, also known as William Venturta-Gutierrez, Defendant-Appellant
No. 15-20595 Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed January 5, 2017
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
William Gutierrez, Pro Se
Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent William Gutierrez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gutierrez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R, 47.5.4.