Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. HARRY PRINCETON HENDERSON, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1982-07-14
Citations: 58 Or. App. 220
Docket Number: No. C81-04-32253, CA A21767
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. HARRY PRINCETON HENDERSON, Appellant.
Judges: Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Warden an Young, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 58
Pages: 220–221

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted March 29,
affirmed July 14, 1982
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. HARRY PRINCETON HENDERSON, Appellant.
(No. C81-04-32253, CA A21767)
647 P2d 988
Steven H. Gorham, Salem, argued the cause and file the brief for appellant.
William F. Nessly, Jr., Assistant Attorney General Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on th brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, an William F. Gary, Solicitor General, Salem.
Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Warden an Young, Judges.
PER CURIAM.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is a criminal case in which defendant was convicted of the crime of robbery in the second degree. Defendant assigns five separate errors on appeal. Pour do not require discussion. The fifth was decided adversely to defendant's position in State v. Freeland, 58 Or App 163, 647 P2d 966 (1982).
Affirmed.