Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roberto BUSTOS-OCHOA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-04-22
Citations: 714 F.3d 1133
Docket Number: No. 11-50471
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roberto BUSTOS-OCHOA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: D.W. NELSON and DIARMUID F. O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges, and JAMES K. SINGLETON, Senior District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 714
Pages: 1133–1134

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roberto BUSTOS-OCHOA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-50471.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
April 22, 2013.
Bruce R. Castetter, Assistant U.S., Mark R. Rehe, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Zandra Luz Lopez, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
D.C. No. 3:10-cr-04188-DMS-l, Southern District of California, San Diego.
Before: D.W. NELSON and DIARMUID F. O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges, and JAMES K. SINGLETON, Senior District Judge.
The Honorable James K. Singleton, Senior District Judge for the U.S. District Court for Alaska, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
ORDER
The opinion filed in this case on December 18, 2012 [704 F.3d 1053] is hereby amended as follows:
On page 5 [704 F.3d at 1056] of the slip opinion, lines 29-32, delete the following citation: "See 8 U.S.C. § 1229c(a)(l) (noting that aliens deportable under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(1), (2)(A)(iii)—the aggravated felony statute—are not eligible for volun tary departure)." Replace this citation with the following: "See 8 C.F.R. § 1240.26(b)(1) (noting that aliens who have "been convicted of a crime described in section 101(a)(43) of the Act"—the section defining aggravated felonies—are not eligible for voluntary departure); see also 8 U.S.C. § 1229c(e) ("The Attorney General may by regulation limit eligibility for voluntary departure under this section for any class or classes of aliens.")."
With this amendment, the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc. The panel has voted unanimously to deny the petition for rehearing. Judge O'Scannlain has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judges Nelson and Singleton have so recommended. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
The petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED. No further petitions for panel rehearing or for rehearing en banc will be entertained.