Case Name: L. Grossman Sons, Inc. vs. Samuel S. Crescione & another
Court: Massachusetts Appeals Court
Jurisdiction: Massachusetts
Decision Date: 1976-11-26
Citations: 4 Mass. App. Ct. 855
Docket Number: 
Parties: L. Grossman Sons, Inc. vs. Samuel S. Crescione & another.
Judges: 
Reporter: Massachusetts Appeals Court Reports
Volume: 4
Pages: 855–855

Head Matter:
L. Grossman Sons, Inc. vs. Samuel S. Crescione & another.
November 26, 1976.
Hertz N. Henkoff for the plaintiff.

Opinion:
The "Findings, Rulings and Order for Decree" of the Land Court requiring reformation of a mortgage deed on the ground of mutual mistake, but subject to the right of the defendant trustee in bankruptcy of Samuel S. Crescione, an original mortgagor (see Section 70[c] [3] of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C. § 110[c][3][1970]), were correct and a proper basis for the judgment which was entered. It is unnecessary to repeat the Land Court's careful analysis and discussion. See also Hillside Co-op. Bank v. Cavanaugh, 232 Mass. 157, 161 (1919); In re Cobb, 14 F. Supp. 465 (E.D. Mich. 1936). The plaintiff, a successor to the original mortgagee who had foreclosed the mortgage, is not entitled to a more favorable judgment; and the defendants do not complain of its form or scope. Compare Hillside Co-op. Bank v. Cavanaugh, supra.
Judgment affirmed.