Case Name: Lovelace Lumber Co. v. Bohler, administratrix, et al.; and vice versa
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1923-12-05
Citations: 31 Ga. App. 296
Docket Number: 14941, 14942
Parties: Lovelace Lumber Co. v. Bohler, administratrix, et al.; and vice versa.
Judges: Luke- and Blood-worth, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 31
Pages: 296–296

Head Matter:
14941, 14942.
Lovelace Lumber Co. v. Bohler, administratrix, et al.; and vice versa.
Decided December 5, 1923.
Trover; from Lincoln superior court—Judge Shurley. July 11, 1923.
Application for certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court.
Burnside & McWhorter, for plaintiff.
Clement JS. Sutton, for defendants.

Opinion:
Broyles, C. J.
1. Under the facts of the case the overruling of the motion for a nonsuit was not error.
2. The jury returned a verdict'for the plaintiff for $500, and the plaintiff made a motion for a new trial which was based upon the usual general grounds only. As there was some evidence to support the verdict, this court is without authority to interfere with the judgment overruling the motion.
Judgment affirmed on main and cross-hills of exceptions.
Luke- and Blood-worth, JJ., concur.