Case Name: John LEBON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert KUPEC, Warden; Maryland Parole Commission; State of Maryland Department of Corrections; Eastern Correctional Institution; Correctional Medical Service, Incorporated; Robert Abbott, Dr., D.D.S.; J.E. Brown, Dr., D.D.S.; Richard Ward, Dr.; A.B. Corbin, L.P.N.; Rob Alderman, P.A., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-02-11
Citations: 29 F. App'x 138
Docket Number: No. 01-7783
Parties: John LEBON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert KUPEC, Warden; Maryland Parole Commission; State of Maryland Department of Corrections; Eastern Correctional Institution; Correctional Medical Service, Incorporated; Robert Abbott, Dr., D.D.S.; J.E. Brown, Dr., D.D.S.; Richard Ward, Dr.; A.B. Corbin, L.P.N.; Rob Alderman, P.A., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 29
Pages: 138–139

Head Matter:
John LEBON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert KUPEC, Warden; Maryland Parole Commission; State of Maryland Department of Corrections; Eastern Correctional Institution; Correctional Medical Service, Incorporated; Robert Abbott, Dr., D.D.S.; J.E. Brown, Dr., D.D.S.; Richard Ward, Dr.; A.B. Corbin, L.P.N.; Rob Alderman, P.A., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 01-7783.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 31, 2002.
Decided Feb. 11, 2002.
John Lebon, Appellant Pro Se. David Phelps Kennedy, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland; Donald Joseph Crawford, Godard, West & Adelman, P.C., Rockville, Maryland; Kristin L. Kremer, Mason, Ketterman & Cawood, P.A., Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
John Lebon appeals the district court's order quashing an earlier show cause order and requiring defendant EMSA Correctional Care, Inc. to file a status report regarding the actions taken to alleviate the health care claims enumerated by Lebon in his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable.
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appeal-able interlocutory or collateral order.
We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.