Case Name: Michael PENNINGTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1994-08-19
Citations: 641 So. 2d 187
Docket Number: No. 93-2898
Parties: Michael PENNINGTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: HARRIS, C.J., and DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 641
Pages: 187–187

Head Matter:
Michael PENNINGTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 93-2898.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Aug. 19, 1994.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Nancy Ryan, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Kellie A. Nielan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The sentence in this case is violative of the dictates of Thompson v. State, 638 So.2d 116 (Fla. 5th DCA June 3, 1994) and must be vacated. Upon remand appellant must be given the option to withdraw his guilty plea should the court intend to depart from the sentencing guidelines. Finally, it is apparent the court's written community control order is different from the judge's oral pronouncements.
SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED.
HARRIS, C.J., and DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ., concur.