Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ralph E. BRAZEL, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-11-24
Citations: 353 F. App'x 389
Docket Number: No. 09-12979
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ralph E. BRAZEL, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 353
Pages: 389–390

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ralph E. BRAZEL, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-12979
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Nov. 24, 2009.
Ralph E. Brazel, Jr., Jesup, GA, pro se.
Judy K. Hunt, United States Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Before BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Leonard E. Clark, appointed counsel for Ralph Brazel, Jr., has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's denial of § 3582(c)(2) relief is AFFIRMED. •