Case Name: Bernard J. CARL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BERNARDJCARL.COM; Fabrice Marchisio; Cotty Vivant Marchisio & Lauzeral, Defendants-Appellees, and NS Holding, Inc., f/k/a Network Solutions, Incorporated; John Doe # 1; John Doe # 2, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-09-07
Citations: 445 F. App'x 639
Docket Number: No. 11-1457
Parties: Bernard J. CARL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BERNARDJCARL.COM; Fabrice Marchisio; Cotty Vivant Marchisio & Lauzeral, Defendants-Appellees, and NS Holding, Inc., f/k/a Network Solutions, Incorporated; John Doe # 1; John Doe # 2, Defendants.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 445
Pages: 639–640

Head Matter:
Bernard J. CARL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BERNARDJCARL.COM; Fabrice Marchisio; Cotty Vivant Marchisio & Lauzeral, Defendants-Appellees, and NS Holding, Inc., f/k/a Network Solutions, Incorporated; John Doe # 1; John Doe # 2, Defendants.
No. 11-1457.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 19, 2011.
Decided: Sept. 7, 2011.
Bernard J. Carl, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Bernard J. Carl appeals the district court's judgment awarding Carl $20,000 in punitive damages. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Carl v. BernardJCarl.com, No. 1:07-cv-01128-TSE-TRJ (E.D.Va. Apr. 14, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.