Case Name: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Camera
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1994-03-23
Citations: 68 Ohio St. 3d 478
Docket Number: No. 93-2180
Parties: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Camera.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 68
Pages: 478–479

Head Matter:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Camera.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Camera (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 478.]
(No. 93-2180
Submitted December 7, 1993
Decided March 23, 1994.)
Geoffrey Stem, Disciplinary Counsel, and Harald Craig III, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.
Mark H. Aultman, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We adopt the findings of fact' and conclusions of law of the board. However, we indefinitely suspend respondent from the practice of law without credit for time served. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Douglas, J., dissents.,
Douglas, J., dissenting.
I respectfully dissent. I would concur with the recommendations of the board.