Case Name: BLAKE et al., Appellants, v. GERKEN, Respondent
Court: New York City Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1901-05
Citations: 71 N.Y.S. 1133
Docket Number: 
Parties: BLAKE et al., Appellants, v. GERKEN, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 71
Pages: 1133–1133

Head Matter:
BLAKE et al., Appellants, v. GERKEN, Respondent.
(City Court of New York, General Term.
May, 1901.)
Appeal from a judgment dismissing tbe plaintiffs’ complaint. Hardy & Shellabarger (Charles J. Hardy, of counsel), for appellants. H. Aplington (J. A. Stitt, of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We think the trial justice erred in his dismissal of the complaint. The undisputed evidence was that work was done and materials furnished, for which plaintiffs were entitled to at least nominal compensation. This judgment must be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide event of action. Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide event. •