Case Name: TAMIAMI ABSTRACT AND TITLE COMPANY, a Florida Corporation, Appellant, v. Fernando RAVELO and Yolanda Gultasca Ravelo, his wife, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1977-08-30
Citations: 349 So. 2d 758
Docket Number: No. 76-1616
Parties: TAMIAMI ABSTRACT AND TITLE COMPANY, a Florida Corporation, Appellant, v. Fernando RAVELO and Yolanda Gultasca Ravelo, his wife, Appellees.
Judges: Before HENDRY, C. J., and PEARSON and BARKDULL, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 349
Pages: 758–758

Head Matter:
TAMIAMI ABSTRACT AND TITLE COMPANY, a Florida Corporation, Appellant, v. Fernando RAVELO and Yolanda Gultasca Ravelo, his wife, Appellees.
No. 76-1616.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Aug. 30, 1977.
Fogle, Connely & Cook, Miami, for appellant.
Knight, Peters, Hoeveler, Pickle, Niem-oeller & Flynn and Gene H. Auvil, Miami, for appellees.
Before HENDRY, C. J., and PEARSON and BARKDULL, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Tampa & Jacksonville Railway Company v. Catts, 79 Fla. 235, 85 So. 364 (1920); Scheuer v. Balik, 130 Fla. 255, 177 So. 731 (1937); Shaw v. Hamm, 133 Fla. 722, 183 So. 19 (1938); Matousek v. Cooper, 111 So.2d 65 (Fla.2nd D.C.A.1959); Horowitz v. United National Corporation, 324 So.2d 189 (Fla.3rd D.C.A.1975).