Case Name: Romeo Sanchez et al., Respondents, v. Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1994-04-19
Citations: 203 A.D.2d 128
Docket Number: 
Parties: Romeo Sanchez et al., Respondents, v Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 203
Pages: 128–129

Head Matter:
Romeo Sanchez et al., Respondents, v Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority, Appellant.
[610 NYS2d 507]

Opinion:
—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Stecher, J.), entered February 11, 1993, which, after a jury trial, awarded damages of $589,000 to plaintiff Romeo Sanchez, and $200,000 to plaintiff Julia Sanchez, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
In order to submit the issue of intoxication to the jury, it is not sufficient that there be merely some evidence that the plaintiff had been drinking, or that there was " 'alcohol on breath' " (Arroyo v City of New York, 171 AD2d 541, 543). Here, plaintiff denied any alcohol consumption. While various witnesses noted alcohol on plaintiff's breath, this observation, standing alone, as noted, does not warrant the giving of an intoxication charge. Only the emergency room physician pur ported to find that plaintiff was "intoxicated" in his notation in the hospital record. Nevertheless, the physician had no recollection of any erratic or intoxicated behavior, and no such behavior was recorded in the chart. Further, the physician himself defined "intoxicated" in a way which did not require a finding beyond that of "alcohol on breath." Under these circumstances, sufficient evidence did not exist to submit the issue to the jury.
The award of damages did not deviate substantially from what would be reasonable compensation. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Rosenberger, Wallach, Ross and Rubin, JJ.