Case Name: Fults v. Paul
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1891-03
Citations: 14 N.Y.S. 4
Docket Number: 
Parties: Fults v. Paul.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 14
Pages: 4–5

Head Matter:
Fults v. Paul.
(Supreme Court, General Term, Fifth Department.
March, 1891.)
■ Appeal—Weight' op Evidence—Sufficiency op Case.
A finding of fact will not be reviewed on appeal, where the case does not show that it contains all the evidence given on the trial.
Appeal from judgment on report of referee.
Action by Henry H. Fults against Wilbur Paul, as administrator, etc., and others. The complaint was dismissed as to defendant Paul, and plaintiff appeals.
Argued before Dwight, P. J., and Macomber and Corlett, JJ.
J. F. Dorthy, for appellant.
J. W. Dinniny, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This was a creditors' bill to set aside a conveyance of land as in fraud of the plaintiff. The only question presented by this appeal is-that of the fraudulent intent of the respondent's intestate, and that question is, by statute, one of fact, and not of law. 2 Rev. St. p. 137, § 4. The case on. this appeal—which was submitted at the last term without oral argument— nowhere shows that it contains all the evidence given on the trial, and we cannot, therefore, review the referee's finding on the question of fact. The judgment must be affirmed. Judgment appealed from affirmed, with costs.