Case Name: Charles J. KOHLHOFER, Appellant, v. BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1952-12-12
Citations: 200 F.2d 560
Docket Number: No. 11604
Parties: Charles J. KOHLHOFER, Appellant, v. BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 200
Pages: 560–560

Head Matter:
Charles J. KOHLHOFER, Appellant, v. BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellee.
No. 11604.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
Dec. 12, 1952.
Manuel Zimmerman, Toledo, Ohio, for appellant.
Joel Rhinefort, Toledo, Ohio, for appel-lee.
Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and ALLEN and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This case having been considered on the record, briefs and oral arguments of counsel for respective parties;
And the Court being of the opinion that considering the testimony in the list most favorable to the appellant, it was not error for the District Judge to direct a verdict for the appellee; Detroit, Toledo & Ironton R. Company v. Rohrs, 114 Ohio St. 493, 151 N.E. 714; Woodworth, Admx. v. New York Central R. Company, 149 Ohio St. 543, 80 N.E.2d 142; Baltimore & Ohio R. Company v. Joseph, 6 Cir., 112 F.2d 518, certiorari denied 312 U.S. 682, 61 S.Ct. 551, 85 L.Ed. 1121, rehearing denied 312 U.S. 714, 61 S.Ct. 710, 85 L.Ed. 1144; Detroit, Toledo & Ironton R. Company v. Yeley, 6 Cir., 165 F.2d 375,
It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and is affirmed.