Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. JASON O'DELL HUGHES, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1993-07-14
Citations: 121 Or. App. 675
Docket Number: CF91-0222; CA A72414
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. JASON O’DELL HUGHES, Appellant.
Judges: Before Rossman, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Leeson, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 121
Pages: 675–676

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted May 28,
affirmed July 14,
reconsideration denied September 29,
petition for review denied November 30, 1993 (318 Or 98)
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. JASON O’DELL HUGHES, Appellant.
(CF91-0222; CA A72414)
855 P2d 667
Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.
Janet A. Metcalf, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Ann Michelle (Micky) Feusse, Certified Law Student, Salem.
Before Rossman, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Leeson, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Pursuant to plea negotiations, defendant pled guilty to two counts of robbery in the first degree and two counts of kidnapping in the second degree, ORS 164.415; ORS 163.225, and the state dismissed four other counts. He challenges the consecutive sentences imposed on the kidnapping convictions, arguing that there was no evidence to support the court's finding that the commission of kidnapping was not merely incidental to the robbery. ORS 137.123.
We do not address defendant's assignment of error. There is no review of a sentence that has resulted from an agreement, as defendant's sentence did here. ORS 138.222 (2)(d); State v. Adams, 315 Or 359, 847 P2d 397 (1993); State v. Tanner, 121 Or App 104, 854 P2d 941 (1993); State v. Kilborn, 120 Or App 462, 852 P2d 935 (1993); State v. Johnston, 120 Or App 165, 851 P2d 1196 (1993).
Affirmed.