Case Name: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THOMAS McKINLAY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1968-01-04
Citations: 51 N.J. 25
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THOMAS McKINLAY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 51
Pages: 25–25

Head Matter:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THOMAS McKINLAY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Argued December 18,1967
Decided January 4,1968.
Mr. Sidney B. Kaufman for appellant (Messrs. Sheldon & Kaufman, attorneys).
Mr. David J. Hughes for respondent (Mr. Leo Kaplowitz, attorney).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division, 98 N. J. Super. 280, 237 A. 2d 274.
For affirmance—Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Prancis, Proctor, Goldmann, Schettino and Haneman—7.
For reversal—None.