Case Name: MIDWEST PRECISION CASTINGS COMPANY, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. MICRODYNE, INC., Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-07-11
Citations: 25 S.W.3d 569
Docket Number: No. ED 76681
Parties: MIDWEST PRECISION CASTINGS COMPANY, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. MICRODYNE, INC., Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, P.J. and MARY K HOFF, J. and JAMES A. PUDLOWSKI, S.J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 25
Pages: 569–570

Head Matter:
MIDWEST PRECISION CASTINGS COMPANY, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. MICRODYNE, INC., Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 76681.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
July 11, 2000.
Jack F. Allen, Clayton, for appellant.
E. Darrell Davis, St. Charles, for respondent.
Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, P.J. and MARY K HOFF, J. and JAMES A. PUDLOWSKI, S.J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Microdyne, Inc. appeals the judgment of the trial court granting a motion for a directed verdict in favor of Midwest Precision Castings Company.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).