Case Name: Kelly F. SHUPPE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-04-17
Citations: 322 F. App'x 350
Docket Number: No. 08-2145
Parties: Kelly F. SHUPPE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 322
Pages: 350–351

Head Matter:
Kelly F. SHUPPE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 08-2145.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 30, 2009.
Decided: April 17, 2009.
Kelly F. Shuppe, Appellant Pro Se. Tara A. Czekaj, Assistant Regional Counsel, Maija Pelly, Social Security Administration, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Ap-pellee.
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kelly F. Shuppe appeals the district court's order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to affirm the Commissioner's decision denying disability insurance benefits. We must uphold the decision to deny benefits if the decision is supported by substantial evidence and the correct law was applied. See 42 U.S.C.A. § 405(g)(West 2006 & Supp.2008); Craig v. Chater, 76 F.3d 585, 589 (4th Cir.1996). We have reviewed the record and the parties' briefs and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Shuppe v. Commissioner, No. 5:07-cv-00057-FPS-JES, 2008 WL 4296747 (N.D.W.Va. Sept. 18, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.