Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stanley A. SLUPKOWSKI, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-10-07
Citations: 333 F. App'x 706
Docket Number: No. 09-6904
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stanley A. SLUPKOWSKI, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 333
Pages: 706–706

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stanley A. SLUPKOWSKI, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-6904.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 29, 2009.
Decided: Oct. 7, 2009.
Stanley A. Slupkowski, Appellant Pro Se. David T. Huband, Bureau of Prisons, Butner, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Stanley A. Slupkowski seeks to appeal the district court's order scheduling a hearing on his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4246 (2006). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Slupkowski seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.