Case Name: Walt PATTERSON, et al. v. Hon. John B. ROBBINS
Court: Arkansas Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Arkansas
Decision Date: 1988-05-16
Citations: 295 Ark. 511
Docket Number: 88-108
Parties: Walt PATTERSON, et al. v. Hon. John B. ROBBINS
Judges: 
Reporter: Arkansas Reports
Volume: 295
Pages: 511–513

Head Matter:
Walt PATTERSON, et al. v. Hon. John B. ROBBINS
88-108
749 S.W.2d 330
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Opinion delivered May 16, 1988
Claudia Driver, Asst. General Counsel, for appellant Dep’t of Human Services; and Robert Depper, for appellants Robert E. Smith and Verdia Smith.
No response.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The petitioners contend that the Probate Court of Garland County lacks jurisdiction of an adoption petition because the persons seeking to adopt are foster parents who lack standing. Although the petitioners are correct in noting that Ark. Code Ann. § 9-9-210(a)(3) (1987) provides that a petition for adoption shall state "the date the petitioner acquired custody of the minor and of placement of the minor and the name of the person placing the minor; and a statement as to how petitioner acquired custody of the minor," we do not interpret that language having to do with the contents of the petition as meaning that a person who does not have custody and with whom the child has not been "placed" has no standing. Standing to adopt is conferred by Ark. Code Ann. § 9-9-204 (1987), and that statute does not exclude persons who have served as foster parents of the minor to be adopted.
In addition, Ark. Code Ann. § 9-9-207 (1987) gives the probate court authority to decide the issue raised by the foster parents whether the Department of Human Services, as legal guardian of the minor, has unreasonably withheld its consent to adopt. The foster parents' rights in that respect are not subject exclusively to the department's policies, the Arkansas Administrative Procedure Act, Ark. Code Ann. §25-15-201 through 25-15-214 (1987), and circuit court review.
Petition for writ of prohibition denied.