Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jerry WARE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-02-21
Citations: 676 F. App'x 381
Docket Number: No. 16-11077
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jerry WARE, Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before JOLLY, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 676
Pages: 381–382

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jerry WARE, Defendant-Appellant
No. 16-11077
Conference Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed February 21, 2017
James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Jerry Ware, Pro Se
Before JOLLY, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Jerry Ware has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ware has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Ware's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant parts of the record reflected therein, as well as Ware's response. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir, R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cm. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.