Case Name: DOROTHY BEVETT MANN AND MAISIE MOBLEY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. VICTOR SHELZI, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1949-07-01
Citations: 4 N.J. Super. 316
Docket Number: 
Parties: DOROTHY BEVETT MANN AND MAISIE MOBLEY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. VICTOR SHELZI, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 4
Pages: 316–318

Head Matter:
DOROTHY BEVETT MANN AND MAISIE MOBLEY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. VICTOR SHELZI, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued June 13, 1949
Decided July 1, 1949.
Before Judges McGeehan, Donges and Colie.
Mr. Hymen B. Mintz (Messrs. Mintz & Herships, attorneys) argued the cause for the plaintiffs-appellants.
Mr. Nicholas Conover English (Messrs. McCarter, English & Studer, attorneys) argued the cause for the defendant-respondent.

Opinion:
Pee Curiam.
The judgment under appeal is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Hartshorne in the Essex County Court. In the construction of a similar statute in New York, the same result was reached. Gruber v. Wilson et al, 276 N. Y. 135, 11 N. E. 2d 568 (Court of Appeals 1937); 125 A. L. R. 457, 473.