Case Name: Maurice BETHEA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTHEASTERN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, a/k/a Robeson County Memorial Hospital, Incorporated, a/k/a Baker-Thompson Memorial Hospital, Incorporated, a/k/a Southeastern General Hospital, Incorporated, a/k/a Southeastern Regional Medical Center, Incorporated; Bruce B. Bergstresser, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-05-02
Citations: 61 F. App'x 887
Docket Number: No. 02-1751
Parties: Maurice BETHEA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTHEASTERN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, a/k/a Robeson County Memorial Hospital, Incorporated, a/k/a Baker-Thompson Memorial Hospital, Incorporated, a/k/a Southeastern General Hospital, Incorporated, a/k/a Southeastern Regional Medical Center, Incorporated; Bruce B. Bergstresser, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 61
Pages: 887–888

Head Matter:
Maurice BETHEA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTHEASTERN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, a/k/a Robeson County Memorial Hospital, Incorporated, a/k/a Baker-Thompson Memorial Hospital, Incorporated, a/k/a Southeastern General Hospital, Incorporated, a/k/a Southeastern Regional Medical Center, Incorporated; Bruce B. Bergstresser, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 02-1751.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 16, 2003.
Decided May 2, 2003.
Daniel F. Read, Durham, North Carolina, for Appellant. James Bernard Spears, Jr., Jerry Howard Walters, Jr., Haynsworth, Baldwin, Johnson & Greaves, L.L.C., Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Maurice Bethea appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of the Defendants, thereby dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bethea v. Southeastern Regional Medical Center, No. CA-01-62-7-F (E.D.N.C. June 6, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED