Case Name: MATSON, Appellant, v. RETRIEVER TOWING, INC., Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1981-11-02
Citations: 54 Or. App. 558
Docket Number: No. 205-192, CA A20397
Parties: MATSON, Appellant, v. RETRIEVER TOWING, INC., Respondent.
Judges: Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Roberts and Young, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 54
Pages: 558–559

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted June 24,
affirmed November 2, 1981
MATSON, Appellant, v. RETRIEVER TOWING, INC., Respondent.
(No. 205-192, CA A20397)
635 P2d 409
Nathan D. Sanders, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were Frank J. Dixon and Sanders & Dixon, Portland.
Steven D. Stadum, Certified Law Student, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Michael A. Lewis and Ragen, Roberts, O’Scannlain, Robertson & Neill, Portland.
Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Roberts and Young, Judges.
PER CURIAM.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is an action for conversion. The trial court granted defendant's motion for a directed verdict on the ground that plaintiff had failed to prove his case by a preponderance of the evidence.
The record on appeal includes a tape cassett audio record. Plaintiff's brief when referring to or reciting evidence fails to make reference to the location of the evidence in the audio record. That violates Rule 25.15, Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Rules of Appellate Procedure. We will not search the tape.
Affirmed.