Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arthur H. GARRISON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-05-08
Citations: 34 F. App'x 98
Docket Number: No. 02-6218
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arthur H. GARRISON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 34
Pages: 98–99

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arthur H. GARRISON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-6218.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 25, 2002.
Decided May 8, 2002.
Arthur H. Garrison, Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr., Office of the United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia; Ruth Elizabeth Plagenhoef, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Arthur H. Garrison seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Garrison's motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Garrison, Nos. CR-97-83; CA-01-332-7 (W.D.Va. filed Jan. 10, 2002 & entered Jan. 11, 2002). We grant Garrison's motion to construe his memorandum as support for his motion for a certificate of appealability and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.