Case Name: In the interest of R.B., a Minor, Y.M.B, Appellant, v. Juvenile Officer of St. Louis County, Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-08-28
Citations: 53 S.W.3d 256
Docket Number: No. ED 78311
Parties: In the interest of R.B., a Minor, Y.M.B, Appellant, v. Juvenile Officer of St. Louis County, Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., J., and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 53
Pages: 256–257

Head Matter:
In the interest of R.B., a Minor, Y.M.B, Appellant, v. Juvenile Officer of St. Louis County, Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 78311.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Aug. 28, 2001.
Laura E. Sidel, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Cynthia Harcourt, Family Court of St. Louis County, Clayton, MO, for respondent..
Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., J., and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Mother appeals from the judgment terminating her parental rights with regard to her minor child, R.B. On appeal Mother challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting termination of her parental rights under Section 211.447.4(2) RSMo 2000 (permitting termination of rights when child has been found abused or neglected) and under Section 211.447.2(2) RSMo 2000 (permitting termination of rights when child has been found abandoned). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file and transcript. We find that the judgment is supported by clear, cogent and convincing evidence, and does not erroneously declare or erroneously apply the law. A written opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, furnished the parties with a brief memorandum for their use only, stating the reasons for this order. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).