Case Name: David L. JONES, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-03-02
Citations: 132 S.W.3d 896
Docket Number: No. ED 82634
Parties: David L. JONES, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 132
Pages: 896–896

Head Matter:
David L. JONES, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Defendant/Respondent.
No. ED 82634.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
March 2, 2004.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 1, 2004.
Application for Transfer Denied May 25, 2004.
Frankel, Rubin, Bond, Dubin, Siegel & Klein, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Patricia A. Hageman, City Counselor, Ed Hanlon, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
David L. Jones appeals from the judgment entered following a jury verdict awarding him $17,440.64, but assessing seventy percent fault to Jones in his personal injury action against the City of St. Louis, effectively reducing his award to $5,233.92. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. The evidence in support of the jury verdict is not insufficient. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the trial court's judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).