Case Name: Stephen Levine et al., Respondents, v. Harriet Feldmann, Appellant. (And Related Actions.)
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2008-01-15
Citations: 47 A.D.3d 686
Docket Number: 
Parties: Stephen Levine et al., Respondents, v Harriet Feldmann, Appellant. (And Related Actions.)
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 47
Pages: 686–686

Head Matter:
Stephen Levine et al., Respondents, v Harriet Feldmann, Appellant. (And Related Actions.)
[848 NYS2d 899]

Opinion:
In an action for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the defendant appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Spinola, J.), entered July 25, 2006, as granted the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment directing specific performance of the contract.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
The plaintiffs established their prima facie entitlement to summary judgment directing specific performance of the contract and, in opposition, the defendant failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment directing specific performance of the contract. Ritter, J.P., Santucci, Miller and Balkin, JJ., concur.