Case Name: ARLETH, Respondent, v. SILER et ux, Appellants
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1981-02-09
Citations: 50 Or. App. 391
Docket Number: No. A7812-20330, CA 17560
Parties: ARLETH, Respondent, v. SILER et ux, Appellants.
Judges: Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Thornton and Van Hoomissen, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 50
Pages: 391–392

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted January 19,
affirmed February 9,
reconsideration denied April 9,
petition for review denied May 5, 1981 (291 Or 1)
ARLETH, Respondent, v. SILER et ux, Appellants.
(No. [ AXXXX-XXXXX ], CA 17560)
622 P2d 1156
Deane Stemdale Bennett, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief was Robert L. McKee, Portland.
Larry Dawson, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.
Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Thornton and Van Hoomissen, Judges.
PER CURIAM.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant's brief does not comply with Rule 7.19 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. We decline to consider the appeal.
Affirmed.