Case Name: Dorothy ROSE v. Richard ROSE
Court: Maine Supreme Judicial Court
Jurisdiction: Maine
Decision Date: 1987-02-23
Citations: 521 A.2d 300
Docket Number: 
Parties: Dorothy ROSE v. Richard ROSE.
Judges: Before McKUSICK, C.J., and NICHOLS, WATHEN, GLASSMAN, SCOLNIK and CLIFFORD, JJ.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 521
Pages: 300–301

Head Matter:
Dorothy ROSE v. Richard ROSE.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.
Argued Jan. 5, 1987.
Decided Feb. 23, 1987.
Murray, Plumb & Murray, David P. Silk, Ellen C. Ballou (orally), Portland, for plaintiff.
Reef, Jordan & Hrycay, Norman S. Reef, Lillian B. Kennedy (orally), Portland, for defendant.
Before McKUSICK, C.J., and NICHOLS, WATHEN, GLASSMAN, SCOLNIK and CLIFFORD, JJ.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
In this divorce action on the appeal of Dorothy Rose from a judgment of the District Court, Portland, the Superior Court, Cumberland County, vacated the judgment of the District Court and remanded the matter to that court for another hearing on all issues. Richard Rose appealed and Dorothy Rose cross-appealed from the judgment of the Superior Court. Because that judgment is not final for purposes of appeal and this case does not fall within any of the recognized exceptions for which interlocutory appeals may be brought, we conclude that the appeal and cross-appeal must be dismissed as premature. See Luchetti v. Luchetti, 445 A.2d 675, 676 (Me.1982); MacDougall v. MacDougall, 408 A.2d 783, 784 (Me.1979).
The entry is: Appeal and cross-appeal dismissed.
All concurring.