Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Robert J. Irwin, Jr., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1990-10-05
Citations: 166 A.D.2d 924
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert J. Irwin, Jr., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 166
Pages: 924–925

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert J. Irwin, Jr., Appellant.

Opinion:
On reargument, judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed and matter remitted to Niagara County Court for further proceedings, in accordance with the following memorandum: On February 2, 1990, we affirmed the judgment entered upon a plea of guilty convicting defendant of two counts of attempted sodomy in the first degree and two counts of sodomy in the second degree. Subsequently, we granted defendant's pro se motion for reargument. On reargument, defendant contends that he was improperly convicted of two counts of attempted sodomy in the first degree.
Our review of the transcript of the plea minutes shows that, although the District Attorney and defendant entered into a plea agreement whereby defendant would plead guilty to two counts of attempted sodomy in the first degree and two counts of sodomy in the second degree in satisfaction of a 74-count indictment, the court asked defendant how he pleaded to two counts of attempted sodomy in the second degree as well as two counts of sodomy in the second degree. The certificate of conviction recites that defendant was convicted of two counts of attempted sodomy in the first degree and two counts of sodomy in the second degree, and defendant was sentenced accordingly.
Because defendant did not plead to attempted sodomy in the first degree, we modify the judgment of conviction by reducing the two convictions for attempted sodomy in the first degree to attempted sodomy in the second degree and by vacating the sentences imposed thereon, and we remit the matter to County Court for resentencing on those counts.
Because the District Attorney did not consent to the acceptance of a plea to attempted sodomy in the second degree, the court should entertain a motion by the People, should the People be so disposed, to vacate the plea and set aside the conviction in its entirety (see, People v Farrar, 52 NY2d 302, 307-308). (Appeal from judgment of Niagara County Court, DiFlorio, J.—attempted sodomy, first degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.