Case Name: Fortunata Mastrobuono, Respondent, v. Brooklyn Home Heating Corporation and Others, Defendants, and Leo Eisemann and Gerard N. Lemon, Copartners, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Gerard Commercial Company, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1930-03
Citations: 228 A.D. 848
Docket Number: 
Parties: Fortunata Mastrobuono, Respondent, v. Brooklyn Home Heating Corporation and Others, Defendants, and Leo Eisemann and Gerard N. Lemon, Copartners, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Gerard Commercial Company, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 228
Pages: 848–848

Head Matter:
Fortunata Mastrobuono, Respondent, v. Brooklyn Home Heating Corporation and Others, Defendants, and Leo Eisemann and Gerard N. Lemon, Copartners, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Gerard Commercial Company, Appellants.

Opinion:
Order denying motion to strike out denial in plaintiff's reply and for judgment on the pleadings affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. We are of opinion that the issue of prior adjudication should be determined upon facts to be elicited at a trial. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Kapper, Hagarty and Seudder, JJ., concur.