Case Name: Phillip John WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2005-05-27
Citations: 902 So. 2d 340
Docket Number: No. 2D04-1203
Parties: Phillip John WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SALCINES and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 902
Pages: 340–340

Head Matter:
Phillip John WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D04-1203.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
May 27, 2005.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Judith Ellis, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard M. Fishkin, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Ap-pellee.

Opinion:
LaROSE, Judge.
Phillip John Wilson appeals his conviction and sentence for possession of Al-prazolam. We affirm the judgment and sentence, with one exception. We strike the $1000 fine imposed under section 775.083(l)(c), Florida Statutes (2003), and remand for correction of the written order assessing fines and costs.
The trial court orally pronounced a fine of $100 under section 775.083(l)(c). The trial court also pronounced other fines and costs not at issue on appeal and stated: "The total [is] $951." The written order reflects a fine of $1000 and a total of $1951 in fines and costs.
The written order must comport with the trial court's oral pronouncement. See Mills v. State, 765 So.2d 153, 154 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). The error was properly preserved by a motion filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2), which was denied. Accordingly, we remand this cause to the trial court with directions to conform the written order assessing fines and costs to the oral pronouncement.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
SALCINES and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.