Case Name: Benjamin A. Norton et al., Resp'ts, v. James W. Matthews et al., App'lts
Court: New York Superior Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1895-01-07
Citations: 64 N.Y. St. Rep. 878
Docket Number: 
Parties: Benjamin A. Norton et al., Resp’ts, v. James W. Matthews et al., App’lts.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 64
Pages: 878–878

Head Matter:
Benjamin A. Norton et al., Resp’ts, v. James W. Matthews et al., App’lts.
Supr. Ct.,
January 7, 1895.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The appellants have failed to print the evidence given upon the trial by the parties, the findings of fact made by the learned trial judge must be deemed to have been made upon sufficient evidence. The only ques tian raised by the appeal, therefore, is whether the conclusions of law are warranted by the facts as found. Upon á careful consideration of this question we think they are. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs, upon the opinion filed below.