Case Name: Joshua Barrett SHAPIRO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mark Douglas STILES, City Attorney, Office of the City Attorney of Virginia Beach, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-07-29
Citations: 389 F. App'x 309
Docket Number: No. 09-2278
Parties: Joshua Barrett SHAPIRO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mark Douglas STILES, City Attorney, Office of the City Attorney of Virginia Beach, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 389
Pages: 309–310

Head Matter:
Joshua Barrett SHAPIRO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mark Douglas STILES, City Attorney, Office of the City Attorney of Virginia Beach, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 09-2278.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 22, 2010.
Decided: July 29, 2010.
Joshua Barrett Shapiro, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Joshua Barrett Shapiro appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Shapiro v. Stiles, No. 2:09-cv-00344-MSD-FBS (E.D.Va. Oct. 30, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.