Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Turonn LEWIS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-06-02
Citations: 280 F. App'x 247
Docket Number: No. 08-6415
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Turonn LEWIS, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 280
Pages: 247–248

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Turonn LEWIS, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 08-6415.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 22, 2008.
Decided: June 2, 2008.
Turonn Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Turonn Lewis seeks to appeal his sentence. In criminal cases, the defendant must file the notice of appeal within ten days after the entry of judgment. Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(1)(A). With or without a motion, upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause, the district court may grant an extension of up to thirty days to file a notice of appeal. Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes, 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir.1985).
The district court entered judgment on June 14, 1993. The notice of appeal was filed on December 26, 2007. Because Lewis failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R.App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988).