Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Maximiliano JIMENEZ-MEJIA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-09-21
Citations: 697 F. App'x 403
Docket Number: No. 15-11243 Summary Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Maximiliano JIMENEZ-MEJIA, Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 697
Pages: 403–404

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Maximiliano JIMENEZ-MEJIA, Defendant-Appellant
No. 15-11243 Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed September 21, 2017
James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Maximiliano Jimenez-Mejia, Pro Se
Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Maximiliano Jimenez-Mejia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Jimenez-Mejia has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as frivolous, see 5th Cir. R. 42.2, and in part as moot based on Jimenez-Mejia's completion of the prison term imposed and the absence of a term of supervised release due to his revocation, see United States v. Heredia-Holguin, 823 F.3d 337, 340 (5th Cir. 2016) (en banc).
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.