Case Name: Lloyd A. WRIGHT, Appellant, v. MORGAN & MORGAN, P.A. and John Dill, Esquire, Individually and as an Attorney of Morgan & Morgan, P.A., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2016-12-22
Citations: 205 So. 3d 889
Docket Number: Case No. 5D16-387
Parties: Lloyd A. WRIGHT, Appellant, v. MORGAN & MORGAN, P.A. and John Dill, Esquire, Individually and as an Attorney of Morgan & Morgan, P.A., Appellees.
Judges: LAWSON, C.J., SAWAYA and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 205
Pages: 889–889

Head Matter:
Lloyd A. WRIGHT, Appellant, v. MORGAN & MORGAN, P.A. and John Dill, Esquire, Individually and as an Attorney of Morgan & Morgan, P.A., Appellees.
Case No. 5D16-387
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Opinion filed December 22, 2016
Lloyd A. Wright, Ormond Beach, pro se.
Richard Burton Bush, and Audra M. Bryant, of Bush, & Augspurger, Tallahassee, for Appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
After careful consideration, we affirm the trial court's entry of final summary judgment. See Sheppard v. State, 151 So.3d 1154, 1171-74 (Fla. 2014); Reaves v. State, 826 So.2d 932, 943-44 (Fla. 2002); Moua v. Pittullo, Howington, Barker, Abernathy, LLP, 228 Cal.App.4th 107, 116-17, 174 Cal.Rptr.3d 662 (2014).
AFFIRMED.
LAWSON, C.J., SAWAYA and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.