Case Name: Roberto HERNANDEZ-ARAIZA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-06-14
Citations: 523 F. App'x 465
Docket Number: No. 06-74419
Parties: Roberto HERNANDEZ-ARAIZA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: REINHARDT, RAWLINSON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 523
Pages: 465–465

Head Matter:
Roberto HERNANDEZ-ARAIZA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 06-74419.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 13, 2013.
Filed June 14, 2013.
Alejandro Garcia, Law Offices of Alejandro Garcia, Commerce, CA, for Petitioner.
OIL, David V. Bernal, Assistant Director, Liza Murcia, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
Before: REINHARDT, RAWLINSON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
ORDER
In light of our opinion in Young v. Holder, 697 F.3d 976 (9th Cir.2012) (en banc), we remand this matter to the BIA to permit Hernandez-Araiza to provide additional evidence supporting his contention that he was not convicted of a controlled substances offense.
A copy of this order, served on the agency, shall serve as the mandate of this court.
REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.