Case Name: Conrad METZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-02-08
Citations: 154 S.W.3d 537
Docket Number: No. WD 63249
Parties: Conrad METZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before: NEWTON, P.J., LOWENSTEIN and HOLLIGER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 154
Pages: 523–523

Head Matter:
Conrad METZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 63249.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Feb. 8, 2005.
Rebecca L. Kurz, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant.
Deborah Daniels, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before: NEWTON, P.J., LOWENSTEIN and HOLLIGER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant-Appellant Conrad Metz appeals the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. This court has reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. Finding no reversible error, this court affirms the denial of the post-trial motion. Because a published opinion reciting the facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential value, this court affirms by summary order under Rule 84.16(b).
Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).