Case Name: Manuel BAKER, Appellant, v. Celia RADOW, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1960-01-07
Citations: 274 F.2d 751
Docket Number: No. 15147
Parties: Manuel BAKER, Appellant, v. Celia RADOW, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 274
Pages: 751–752

Head Matter:
Manuel BAKER, Appellant, v. Celia RADOW, Appellee.
No. 15147.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued Dec. 21, 1959.
Decided Jan. 7, 1960.
Mr. Allan C. Swingle, Washington, D. C. , for appellant.
Mr. Arthur S. Feld, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Joseph D. Bulman and Sidney M. Goldstein, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellee.
Before Prettyman, Chief Judge, and Bazelon and Bastían, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment against him in appellee's suit for damages resulting from an automobile collision. His primary point, that the court erred in refusing to direct a verdict in his favor, rests on his contention that some of the testimony against him was inherently incredible. We find no error.
Affirmed.