Case Name: W. T. RAWLEIGH CO. v. CLARK et al.
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1926-12-14
Citations: 120 Okla. 301
Docket Number: No. 15713
Parties: W. T. RAWLEIGH CO. v. CLARK et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 120
Pages: 301–302

Head Matter:
W. T. RAWLEIGH CO. v. CLARK et al.
No. 15713
Opinion Filed Dec. 14, 1926.
T. M. Robinson, for .plaintiff in error.
P. K. Morrill .and P. Mounts, for defendants in error1.

Opinion:
Opinion by
DICKSON, O.
This case was tried in the district court of Jackson county on July 12, 1922, resulting in a judgment for the defendant. The plaintiff perfected its appeal to this court by filing its petition in error with case-made attached thereto on April 5, 1924. On January 3. 1925, the plaintiff in error filed its brief. On March 9, 1925, a stipulation was filed in said cause, to the effect that this case be continued pending the final decision in this court of T. J. Sparkman v. W. T. Rawleigh Co. (14284). Said cause was finally disposed of on April 13, 1926, 117 Okla. 235, 245 Pac. 828.
On July 20, 1926, the defendants in error were, by the order of this court, directed to file tlielr brief on or before September 15, 1926. This order has not been complied with and no excuse is offered or has been given therefor.
We have examined the errors assigned in the brief of the plaintiff in error and the abstract of the record upon which they are predicated and the grounds for reversal urged appear to be well taken.
In these circumstances we are not required to search the records for reasons why the judgment should be upheld or for authorities in support of the judgment appealed from. Under the authority of Miles v. Bird, 41 Okla. 428, 138 Pac. 789, and Walker v. Robinson, 66 Okla. 56, 166 Pac. 1042, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded to the district court of Jackson county for a new trial.
By the Court: It is so>ordered.