Case Name: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Mark WALLACE, Respondent; Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Mark Green, Respondent; Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Mark Green a/k/a Mark Wallace, Respondent; Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Mark Wallace, Respondent; Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Mark Wallace, Respondent; Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Mark Wallace, Respondent; Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. James Smith, Respondent; Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Mark Wallace, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2013-03-22
Citations: 64 A.3d 620
Docket Number: 
Parties: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Mark WALLACE, Respondent. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Mark Green, Respondent. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Mark Green a/k/a Mark Wallace, Respondent. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Mark Wallace, Respondent. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Mark Wallace, Respondent. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Mark Wallace, Respondent. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. James Smith, Respondent. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Mark Wallace, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 64
Pages: 620–620

Head Matter:
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Mark WALLACE, Respondent. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Mark Green, Respondent. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Mark Green a/k/a Mark Wallace, Respondent. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Mark Wallace, Respondent. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Mark Wallace, Respondent. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Mark Wallace, Respondent. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. James Smith, Respondent. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Mark Wallace, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
March 22, 2013.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 22nd day of March, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Did Superior Court err by holding in a published opinion that an incarcerated career criminal has a due process right to a hearing at which the trial court must determine — on a charge by charge basis — whether over a hundred prior criminal charges against him should be expunged?
The issue will be SUBMITTED on briefs.