Case Name: Jack Pulichene, Respondent, v. Frank Nightingale, Rose Marie Stoddard, Defendants, and Paul Pulichene, Appellant. (Action No. 1.); Jack Pulichene, Respondent, v. Frank Nightingale, Rose Marie Stoddard, Defendants, and Paul Pulichene, Appellant. (Action No. 2.); Mary Pulichene, Respondent, v. Frank Nightingale, Rose Marie Stoddard, Defendants, and Paul Pulichene, Appellant. (Action No. 3.)
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1935-12
Citations: 246 A.D. 775
Docket Number: 
Parties: Jack Pulichene, Respondent, v. Frank Nightingale, Rose Marie Stoddard, Defendants, and Paul Pulichene, Appellant. (Action No. 1.) Jack Pulichene, Respondent, v. Frank Nightingale, Rose Marie Stoddard, Defendants, and Paul Pulichene, Appellant. (Action No. 2.) Mary Pulichene, Respondent, v. Frank Nightingale, Rose Marie Stoddard, Defendants, and Paul Pulichene, Appellant. (Action No. 3.)
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 246
Pages: 775–775

Head Matter:
Jack Pulichene, Respondent, v. Frank Nightingale, Rose Marie Stoddard, Defendants, and Paul Pulichene, Appellant. (Action No. 1.) Jack Pulichene, Respondent, v. Frank Nightingale, Rose Marie Stoddard, Defendants, and Paul Pulichene, Appellant. (Action No. 2.) Mary Pulichene, Respondent, v. Frank Nightingale, Rose Marie Stoddard, Defendants, and Paul Pulichene, Appellant. (Action No. 3.)

Opinion:
Three actions for damages arising out of an automobile collision. By stipulation they were consolidated and tried together. Appeal by defendant Paul Pulichene from the judgment and also from the order denying his motion for a new trial. Judgment and order of the County Court of Dutchess county unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present— Young, Hagarty, Davis and Johnston, JJ.; Lazansky, P. J., not voting.