Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Carlos ROSARIO-RAMOS, also known as Carlos Rosario, also known as Carlos Rosario Ramos, also known as David Torres Mosqueda, also known as David Torres, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-04-16
Citations: 564 F. App'x 56
Docket Number: No. 13-20245
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Carlos ROSARIO-RAMOS, also known as Carlos Rosario, also known as Carlos Rosario Ramos, also known as David Torres Mosqueda, also known as David Torres, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before PRADO, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 564
Pages: 56–57

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Carlos ROSARIO-RAMOS, also known as Carlos Rosario, also known as Carlos Rosario Ramos, also known as David Torres Mosqueda, also known as David Torres, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-20245
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 16, 2014.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee.
Andrew J. Williams, Kingwood, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before PRADO, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Carlos Rosario-Ramos has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Rosario-Ramos has not filed a- response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.