Case Name: Rodney HARRIS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-04-06
Citations: 131 S.W.3d 853
Docket Number: No. ED 82460
Parties: Rodney HARRIS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, C.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 131
Pages: 853–854

Head Matter:
Rodney HARRIS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 82460.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
April 6, 2004.
Amanda R. Schehr, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Andrea Kaye Spillars, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, C.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Rodney Harris (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant contends he entered his guilty plea to first-degree robbery unknowingly because his counsel failed to inform him that he would be required to serve 85 percent of the prison term before becoming eligible for parole.
Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2003, unless otherwise indicated.