Case Name: Jennifer M. MCGOWAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ABM JANITORIAL SERVICES, Northeast, Inc.; Ursula Baskett, Defendants-Appellees, and ABM Janitorial Services-North Central, Inc.; ABM Janitorial Services-Mid-Atlantic, Inc., Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-02-06
Citations: 464 F. App'x 153
Docket Number: No. 11-1840
Parties: Jennifer M. MCGOWAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ABM JANITORIAL SERVICES, Northeast, Inc.; Ursula Baskett, Defendants-Appellees, and ABM Janitorial Services-North Central, Inc.; ABM Janitorial Services-Mid-Atlantic, Inc., Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 464
Pages: 153–153

Head Matter:
Jennifer M. MCGOWAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ABM JANITORIAL SERVICES, Northeast, Inc.; Ursula Baskett, Defendants-Appellees, and ABM Janitorial Services-North Central, Inc.; ABM Janitorial Services-Mid-Atlantic, Inc., Defendants.
No. 11-1840.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 31, 2012.
Decided: Feb. 6, 2012.
Jennifer M. McGowan, Appellant Pro Se. Michael R. Ward, Morris & Morris, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
In this personal injury action, removed to federal court under the court's diversity jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (2006), Jennifer M. McGowan appeals the district court's order granting Defendants' Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Having reviewed the district court's ruling de novo, Taylor v. Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc., 658 F.3d 402, 408 (4th Cir.2011), we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McGowan v. ABM Janitorial Servs., No. 2:10-cv-00388-MSD-DEM, 2011 WL 2604107 (E.D. Va. filed June 29 & entered June 30, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.