Case Name: PABST BREWING COMPANY, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. JOHN I. HAAS, INC. and John Barth Incorporated, Plaintiffs Below, Appellees, v. LUPOFRESH, INC., Plaintiff Below, Appellee
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Delaware
Decision Date: 1986-06-17
Citations: 510 A.2d 487
Docket Number: 
Parties: PABST BREWING COMPANY, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. JOHN I. HAAS, INC. and John Barth Incorporated, Plaintiffs Below, Appellees, v. LUPOFRESH, INC., Plaintiff Below, Appellee.
Judges: Before McNEILLY, HORSEY and MOORE, JJ.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 510
Pages: 487–488

Head Matter:
PABST BREWING COMPANY, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. JOHN I. HAAS, INC. and John Barth Incorporated, Plaintiffs Below, Appellees, v. LUPOFRESH, INC., Plaintiff Below, Appellee.
Supreme Court of Delaware.
Submitted: June 17, 1986.
Decided: June 17, 1986.
Peter M. Sieglaff, Potter, Anderson & Corroon, Wilmington, Thomas G.A. Herz and R. Jeffrey Krill (argued), Michael, Best & Friedrich, Milwaukee, Wis., of counsel, for appellant.
Irving Morris and Kevin Gross, Morris and Rosenthal, P.A., Wilmington, Merrill G. Davidoff (argued), David Berger, H. Laddie Montague, Jr., Daniel Berger, and Alan M. Sandals, Berger & Montague, P.C., Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel, for appellees John I. Haas, Inc. and John Barth Incorporated.
John A. Parkins, Jr., Richards, Layton & Finger, Wilmington, Eugene Mittelman (argued), and Robert Fierman, Dreyer and Traub, New York City, of counsel, for ap-pellee Lupofresh, Inc.
Before McNEILLY, HORSEY and MOORE, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
On the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the trial court, see Lupofresh, Inc. v. Pabst Brewing Company, Inc., Del. Super., 505 A.2d 37 (1985), the judgment is hereby
AFFIRMED.