Case Name: Stanley JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-01-23
Citations: 36 S.W.3d 419
Docket Number: No. ED 77910
Parties: Stanley JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., P.J., MARY RHODES RUSSELL, J„ and TEITELMAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 36
Pages: 419–420

Head Matter:
Stanley JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 77910.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Jan. 23, 2001.
Gwenda R. Robinson, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Stephanie Morrell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., P.J., MARY RHODES RUSSELL, J„ and TEITELMAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief.
The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact and conclusions of law that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).