Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas E. SMITH, Jr., a/k/a Anthony Young, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-11-26
Citations: 547 F. App'x 230
Docket Number: No. 13-7419
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas E. SMITH, Jr., a/k/a Anthony Young, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 547
Pages: 230–230

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas E. SMITH, Jr., a/k/a Anthony Young, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-7419.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 21, 2013.
Decided: Nov. 26, 2013.
Thomas E. Smith, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin L. Hatch, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia; Paulo Custodio Palugod, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Thomas E. Smith, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying Smith's various motions in his closed criminal case and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Smith, No. l:03-cr-00245-TSE-l (E.D. Va. Mar. 13 & Aug. 15, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.