Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ratsmy POUNPANYA, aka Jay, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-08-26
Citations: 142 F. App'x 311
Docket Number: No. 03-10015
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ratsmy POUNPANYA, aka Jay, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: FARRIS, NOONAN, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 142
Pages: 311–312

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ratsmy POUNPANYA, aka Jay, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 03-10015.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 4, 2004.
Decided Aug. 26, 2005.
Thomas C. Muehleck, Honolulu, HI, for Plaintiff — Appellee.
Loretta A. Sheehan, Glenn D. Choy, Esq., Honolulu, HI, for Defendant — Appellant.
Before: FARRIS, NOONAN, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
The Supreme Court has vacated this Court's memorandum disposition filed on May 13, 2004, ordering a reconsideration in light of its recent holding in United, States v. Booker. See — U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621, L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). For the reasons set forth therein and in our recent decision in United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (2005) (en banc), Pounpanya's sentence is VACATED and REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.