Case Name: Max J. Roth, Resp't, v. Metropolitan Street Railway Company, App'lt
Court: New York Court of Common Pleas
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1895-06-27
Citations: 68 N.Y. St. Rep. 113
Docket Number: 
Parties: Max J. Roth, Resp’t, v. Metropolitan Street Railway Company, App’lt.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 68
Pages: 113–114

Head Matter:
Max J. Roth, Resp’t, v. Metropolitan Street Railway Company, App’lt.
(New York Common Pleas, General Term,
Filed June 27, 1895.)
Negligence — Contmbutoby.
Where, in an action to recover damages sustained through a collision with a cable car, the performance of the legal duty to observe the condition of the tracks was made impossible by the plaintiff's own act, he is guilty of contributory negligence.
Appeal from a judgment for plaintiff.
Henry A. Robinson, for app’lt; J. B. Sabine, for resp’t.

Opinion:
Bischoff, J.
— This action was brought to recover for injuries-, to plaintiff's wagon, sustained when in collision with one of the defendant's cable cars. The inevitable inference to be drawn from the plaintiff's evidence is that his servant, in charge of the wagon, was chargeable with contributory negligence; hence the recovery below is not tobe sustained. From the testimony of the plaintiff's driver it appears that after crossing the defendant's track, at the outer edge of a curve, he drew up his wagon by the side of the-track in order that two cars, coming from opposite directions, might pass him, it being his intention to recross the tracks. His wagon was loaded with trunks, piled in such a manner that his view on either side was cut off, and he was able only to observe-what passed in front. This being his situation, he listened for the sound of a gong, the signal of warning given from the defendant's cars when deemed requisite, and, hearing no sound, he-suddenly turned his horse upon the track, and the wagon was collided with by a car approaching from the rear. There was no-evidence that the defendant's servants were required by law to continuously sound the gong when the track was unobstructed, and it was the duty of the plaintiff's driver to look for approaching danger before attempting to cross the tracks. ' In this case negligence was predicable of the manner in which the wagon was loaded, since thereby performance of the legal duty to observe the condition of the tracks was made impossible by the act of the party upon whom the duty was imposed.
The judgment must be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with. costs to abide the event.
All concur.