Case Name: Charles A. DUNN, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doctor TESSEMA; Razaak Eniola, Doctor; Prison Health Services, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-01-05
Citations: 212 F. App'x 210
Docket Number: No. 06-7632
Parties: Charles A. DUNN, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doctor TESSEMA; Razaak Eniola, Doctor; Prison Health Services, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 212
Pages: 210–211

Head Matter:
Charles A. DUNN, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doctor TESSEMA; Razaak Eniola, Doctor; Prison Health Services, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 06-7632.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 21, 2006.
Decided: Jan. 5, 2007.
Charles A. Dunn, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Donald Joseph Crawford, Aldelman, Sheff & Smith, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Charles A. Dunn, Sr., appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Dunn's motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dunn v. Tessema, No. 8:06-cv-00573-RWT (D. Md. filed Sept. 7, 2006; entered Sept. 8, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.