Case Name: In the Matter of Clyde R. JAMES, Bankrupt. In the Matter of Michael W. CEDOR, Bankrupt. James H. RIGGS, Trustee and Appellant, v. Clyde R. JAMES, Bankrupt and Appellee; Edward M. WALSH, Trustee and Appellant, v. Michael W. CEDOR, Bankrupt and Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1972-12-22
Citations: 470 F.2d 996
Docket Number: Nos. 72-1483, 72-2311
Parties: In the Matter of Clyde R. JAMES, Bankrupt. In the Matter of Michael W. CEDOR, Bankrupt. James H. RIGGS, Trustee and Appellant, v. Clyde R. JAMES, Bankrupt and Appellee. Edward M. WALSH, Trustee and Appellant, v. Michael W. CEDOR, Bankrupt and Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 470
Pages: 996–996

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Clyde R. JAMES, Bankrupt. In the Matter of Michael W. CEDOR, Bankrupt. James H. RIGGS, Trustee and Appellant, v. Clyde R. JAMES, Bankrupt and Appellee. Edward M. WALSH, Trustee and Appellant, v. Michael W. CEDOR, Bankrupt and Appellee.
Nos. 72-1483, 72-2311.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Dec. 22, 1972.
Burton I. Meyer (argued), of Glicks-berg, Kushner & Goldberg, Harvey W. Hoffman, San Francisco, Cal., Robert R. Barton, Oakland, Cal., for appellants.
Thomas R. Adams (argued), Peter H. Reid, Ralph L. Jacobson, Legal Aid Society of San Mateo County, Daly City, Cal., Hansen, Jaffe & Weiss, San Francisco, Cal., for appellees.
Lynn Anderson Roller, (argued), of Newmark & Roller, Lafayette, Cal., for amicus curiae.
Before BARNES, ROELSCH and ELY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The challenged Orders of the District Court are affirmed upon the authority of Lines v. Frederick, 400 U.S. 18, 91 S.Ct. 113, 27 L.Ed.2d 124 (1970), and the carefully reasoned opinion of District Judge Wollenberg. In re Cedor, 337 F.Supp. 1103 (D.C.N.D.Cal.1972).
We cannot see that our opinion in any way conflicts with In re Aveni, 458 F.2d 972 (6th Cir. 1972). There, a clearly different problem was presented.