Case Name: Otis SANDUSKY, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee
Court: Kentucky Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Kentucky
Decision Date: 1954-11-12
Citations: 272 S.W.2d 802
Docket Number: 
Parties: Otis SANDUSKY, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 272
Pages: 802–803

Head Matter:
Otis SANDUSKY, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky.
Nov. 12, 1954.
Shumate & Shumate and Thomas D. Shu-mate, Richmond, for appellant.
J. D. Buckman, Jr., Atty. Gen., Wm. F. Simpson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We are affirming the judgment in this case for a $50 fine and 60 days in jail because we think (1) the use of the word '.'liquor" in the warrant was sufficient to inform the-appellánt of the nature of the charge against him; and (2) the affidavit in support of the search warrant was regular on its face.
The motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.