Case Name: In the Matter of the Claim of Catherine Marincel, Respondent, v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company et al., Appellants. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1976-12-20
Citations: 40 N.Y.2d 1032
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Claim of Catherine Marincel, Respondent, v Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 40
Pages: 1032–1033

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Claim of Catherine Marincel, Respondent, v Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.
Argued November 19, 1976;
decided December 20, 1976
John C. Fish for appellants.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Henriette Frieder, Ruth Kessler Toch and Daniel Polansky of counsel), for Workmen’s Compensation Board, respondent.

Opinion:
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (50 AD2d 630).
Concur: Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchs-berg and Cooke. Taking no part: Chief Judge Breitel.