Case Name: Union Dime Savings Bank, Respondent, v. Joseph Frohlich et al., Doing Business as Fredericks Delicatessen, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1977-05-09
Citations: 57 A.D.2d 862
Docket Number: 
Parties: Union Dime Savings Bank, Respondent, v Joseph Frohlich et al., Doing Business as Fredericks Delicatessen, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 57
Pages: 862–862

Head Matter:
Union Dime Savings Bank, Respondent, v Joseph Frohlich et al., Doing Business as Fredericks Delicatessen, Appellants.

Opinion:
In a proceeding, inter alia, to evict a tenant, the appeal (by permission) is from an order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court for the Ninth and Tenth Judicial Districts, dated September 22, 1976, which reversed a judgment of the District Court, Nassau County, Third District, in favor of the appellant tenants and awarded possession and a money judgment to the respondent landlord. Order affirmed, with costs. The appellant tenants were not physically expelled or excluded from the demised premises. Therefore, a partial, actual eviction had not occurred. The tenants cannot claim a constructive eviction since at no time did they abandon the premises. Hopkins, J. P., Margett, Damiani and Rabin, JJ., concur.