Case Name: In the Matter of the Application of Dr. Gustavo G. E. De Luca, Petitioner, Appellant, for an Order to Compel James Byrne and Others, Being Members of the Board of Regents of the University of the State of New York, Defendants, Respondents, to Indorse His Italian Medical License or Diploma as a License to Practice Medicine in the State of New York, Pursuant to Section 51 of the Education Law
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1939-01-11
Citations: 256 A.D. 859
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Application of Dr. Gustavo G. E. De Luca, Petitioner, Appellant, for an Order to Compel James Byrne and Others, Being Members of the Board of Regents of the University of the State of New York, Defendants, Respondents, to Indorse His Italian Medical License or Diploma as a License to Practice Medicine in the State of New York, Pursuant to Section 51 of the Education Law.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 256
Pages: 859–860

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Application of Dr. Gustavo G. E. De Luca, Petitioner, Appellant, for an Order to Compel James Byrne and Others, Being Members of the Board of Regents of the University of the State of New York, Defendants, Respondents, to Indorse His Italian Medical License or Diploma as a License to Practice Medicine in the State of New York, Pursuant to Section 51 of the Education Law.

Opinion:
This is an appeal by the petitioner from an order denying petitioner's application for an order directing the respondents to indorse his Italian license to practice medicine by virtue of the authority conferred upon the Regents by subdivision 3 of section 51 of the Education Law. The Board after carefully examining all the evidence before it decided that the evidence submitted was not satisfyingly sufficient to warrant such indorsement but offered the petitioner the right to take medical licensing examinations. An examination of the entire record shows that there is no question of fact for review, the facts being admitted, and it also shows that the action of the Board of Regents was not arbitrary, unfair or capricious and, therefore, the order appealed from is affirmed. Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, MeNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ. [168 Mise. 841.]