Case Name: Flossie L. GLADFELTER and Kenneth Gladfelter, her husband, and Frances K. Gladfelter, a minor, by her father and next friend, Kenneth Gladfelter, Petitioners, v. Arthur H. LOISELLE, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1964-07-01
Citations: 165 So. 2d 767
Docket Number: No. 33407
Parties: Flossie L. GLADFELTER and Kenneth Gladfelter, her husband, and Frances K. Gladfelter, a minor, by her father and next friend, Kenneth Gladfelter, Petitioners, v. Arthur H. LOISELLE, Respondent.
Judges: DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 165
Pages: 767–767

Head Matter:
Flossie L. GLADFELTER and Kenneth Gladfelter, her husband, and Frances K. Gladfelter, a minor, by her father and next friend, Kenneth Gladfelter, Petitioners, v. Arthur H. LOISELLE, Respondent.
No. 33407.
Supreme Court of Florida.
July 1, 1964.
Sams, Anderson, Alper & Spencer and Sam Daniels, Miami, for petitioners.
Henry Burnett, of Fowler, White, Gillen, Humkey & Trenam, Miami, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
On petitioner's request, writ of certiorari was granted and oral argument authorized pursuant to Article V, Section 4(2) of the Constitution of Florida, F.S.A. because of a certificate of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, that their decision in Loiselle v. Gladfelter, 160 So.2d 740 "passes upon a question of great public interest." After further consideration we hold that the opinion of the District Court, supra, properly disposes of the questions of law presented and is approved by this court.
Accordingly the writ of certiorari heretofore entered is discharged.
DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.