Case Name: Robert Allan UNGER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Derrick ASTON, Commonwealth Attorney, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-01-23
Citations: 709 F. App'x 214
Docket Number: No. 17-7221
Parties: Robert Allan UNGER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Derrick ASTON, Commonwealth Attorney, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 709
Pages: 214–215

Head Matter:
Robert Allan UNGER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Derrick ASTON, Commonwealth Attorney, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 17-7221
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: January 18, 2018
Decided: January 23, 2018
■ Robert Allan Unger,. Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Robert Allan Unger appeals the district court's order dismissing his complaint. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Unger's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, Unger has forfeited appellate review - of the court's order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) ("The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief."). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED