Case Name: Jose F. REUTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Paula PRICE, Lcws-C Adult Protection Agency; David A. Engle, Director, Washington County Department of Social Services; Ann Bushong, Case Manager Supervisor, Washington County Department of Social Services; Lynn M. Smith, Case Manager, Washington County Department of Social Services; Judy Varroan; Alice Sendindiver, Department of Social Services; Washington County Supervisors, Gregory I. Snook, President; John Doe; Jane Doe, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-11-22
Citations: 155 F. App'x 646
Docket Number: No. 05-1900
Parties: Jose F. REUTER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Paula PRICE, Lcws-C Adult Protection Agency; David A. Engle, Director, Washington County Department of Social Services; Ann Bushong, Case Manager Supervisor, Washington County Department of Social Services; Lynn M. Smith, Case Manager, Washington County Department of Social Services; Judy Varroan; Alice Sendindiver, Department of Social Services; Washington County Supervisors, Gregory I. Snook, President; John Doe; Jane Doe, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 155
Pages: 646–647

Head Matter:
Jose F. REUTER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Paula PRICE, Lcws-C Adult Protection Agency; David A. Engle, Director, Washington County Department of Social Services; Ann Bushong, Case Manager Supervisor, Washington County Department of Social Services; Lynn M. Smith, Case Manager, Washington County Department of Social Services; Judy Varroan; Alice Sendindiver, Department of Social Services; Washington County Supervisors, Gregory I. Snook, President; John Doe; Jane Doe, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 05-1900.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 17, 2005.
Decided: Nov. 22, 2005.
Jose F. Reuter, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Jose F. Reuter appeals the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Reuter v. Price, No. CA-05-1996-CCB (D.Md. Aug. 4, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED