Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas R. FARRUGIA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-07-13
Citations: 234 F. App'x 780
Docket Number: Nos. 06-10344, 06-10521
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas R. FARRUGIA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 234
Pages: 780–780

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas R. FARRUGIA, Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 06-10344, 06-10521.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 9, 2007 .
Filed July 13, 2007.
Kevin P. Rooney, Esq., USF—Office of the U.S. Attorney, Fresno, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Thomas R. Farrugia, Terre Haute, IN, pro se.
Before: LEAVY, THOMAS and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). The request for oral argument is denied.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Thomas R. Farrugia appeals pro se from the district court's orders denying his motions to compel the government to 1) perform tests on certain trial exhibits; 2) provide samples of the exhibits to attorney Cheryl Sturm for testing; and 3) provide him with documents related to the exhibits.
Farrugia's motion for an extension of time to file the reply brief is granted. The Clerk shall file the brief and supplemental excerpts of record received on May 23, 2007.
The district court properly concluded that Farrugia's motions are unrelated to any actions currently pending. Accordingly, the district court's orders denying the motions and denying the motion for reconsideration are affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.