Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Paul A. Orane, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1989-03-10
Citations: 148 A.D.2d 949
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Paul A. Orane, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 148
Pages: 949–950

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Paul A. Orane, Appellant.

Opinion:
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant forfeited his claim that the court abused its discretion in denying his motion to disqualify the District Attorney's office when he entered a guilty plea to the indictment (People v Manzo, 99 AD2d 817; see, People v Taylor, 65 NY2d 1, 5-6; People v Stephens, 122 AD2d 606, 608, Iv denied 68 NY2d 817). Were we to address defendant's claim, we would find it lacking in merit (see, Matter of Schumer v Holtzman, 60 NY2d 46; People v Shinkle, 51 NY2d 417; Matter of Relin v Celli, 134 AD2d 960). (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Maloy, J. — robbery, first degree, and other charges.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Boomer, Green and Davis, JJ.