Case Name: Sharon GORDON, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Michael BABCOCK, Defendant/Appellant, and Nocturne Enterprises, Inc., et al., Defendants
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-10-11
Citations: 181 S.W.3d 86
Docket Number: No. ED 85563
Parties: Sharon GORDON, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Michael BABCOCK, Defendant/Appellant, and Nocturne Enterprises, Inc., et al., Defendants.
Judges: Before NANNETTE A. BAKER, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 181
Pages: 86–87

Head Matter:
Sharon GORDON, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Michael BABCOCK, Defendant/Appellant, and Nocturne Enterprises, Inc., et al., Defendants.
No. ED 85563.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Oct. 11, 2005.
Application for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 29, 2005.
Application for Transfer Denied Jan. 31, 2006.
Charles W. Gray, St. Charles, MO, for Appellant.
William Laird Hetlage, Lawrence Gerard Gillespie — co-counsel, Clayton, MO, for Respondent.
Before NANNETTE A. BAKER, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Michael Babcock (Appellant) appeals from a trial court judgment denying Appellant's Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Appellant's Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment because the motion does not state facts constituting a meritorious defense and does not show good cause. Hinton v. Proctor & Schwartz, Inc., 99 S.W.3d 454, 458 (Mo.App. E.D.2003); Rule 74.05(d). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R. Civ. P.2004, unless otherwise indicated.