Case Name: BLAKEY vs. SAUNDERS
Court: Supreme Court of Missouri
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1846-01
Citations: 9 Mo. 733
Docket Number: 
Parties: BLAKEY vs. SAUNDERS.
Judges: 
Reporter: Missouri Reports
Volume: 9
Pages: 733–734

Head Matter:
BLAKEY vs. SAUNDERS.
The sci.fa. to revive a judgment, set out the judgment as follows: “As well the sum of $1,200, a certain debt, as the sum of $248 for his damages which he had sustained, as well by reason of the detention of that debt as for Ms costs,” ^-c. On the issue upon the thepU-iof nul tiel record, the record offered in evidence shewed a recovery of $1,200 debt, £2-18 damages and cosis. Held, to be a fatal variance on the plea.
APPEAL from Greene Circuit Court.

Opinion:
Scott, J.,
delivered the opinion of the court.
Saunders, the appellee, executor of Wm. Saunders, deceased, sued out a scire facias to revive in his own name, a judgment recovered in the Greene Circuit Court, by Wm. Saunders in his lifetime, against James W. Blakey, the appellant. The scire facias recites that, "Whereas at a circuit court held within and for the county of Greene, on the 3d Monday after the fourth Monday of April, A. D. 1843, a certain Wm. Saunders recovered against a certain James W. Blakey, late of said county, as well the sum of $1,200, a certain debt, as the sum of $248 for his damages, which he had sustained as well by reason of the detention of that debt as for his costs, by him about his suit in that behalf expended," &c. On the trial of the issue on the plea of nu l tiel record, the record of the judgment was read in evidence, from which it appeared that Saunders recovered judgment against Blakey for $1,200 debt, $248 damages and for costs. The record was objected to as evidence, but the objection was overruled and judgment was rendered against Blakey, the appellant.
There was a manifest variance between the scire facias, reciting that the sum of $248 included as well the damages as the costs, and the record read in evidence, showing that the sum of $248 was for the damages only, and that there was a further judgment for costs. The variance is fatal, the defendant having put the record in issue by his plea of nul tiel record; Bibbins, vs. Noxon, 4 Wend. 207.
The other Judges concurring, the judgment will be reversed and cause remanded.