Case Name: NED K. FINKELSTEIN, RESPONDENT, v. HERMAN GEISMAR, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1918-05-03
Citations: 92 N.J.L. 251
Docket Number: 
Parties: NED K. FINKELSTEIN, RESPONDENT, v. HERMAN GEISMAR, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 92
Pages: 251–251

Head Matter:
NED K. FINKELSTEIN, RESPONDENT, v. HERMAN GEISMAR, APPELLANT.
Submitted March 25, 1918
Decided May 3, 1918.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 91 N. J. L. 46.
For the respondent, McDermott & Enright.
For the appellant, Weller & Lichtenstein.

Opinion:
Pee Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, JJ. 11.
For reversal — ISTone.