Case Name: William LANE, Petitioner, v. PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and the Florida Industrial Commission, an Administrative Agency, Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1969-04-23
Citations: 222 So. 2d 19
Docket Number: No. 38340
Parties: William LANE, Petitioner, v. PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and the Florida Industrial Commission, an Administrative Agency, Respondents.
Judges: ROBERTS, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 222
Pages: 19–21

Head Matter:
William LANE, Petitioner, v. PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and the Florida Industrial Commission, an Administrative Agency, Respondents.
No. 38340.
Supreme Court of Florida.
April 23, 1969.
Jack H. Cohen, of Law Office of David Goldman, Miami, for petitioner.
Jerry V. Wilkey, Miami, Patrick H. Mears and J. Franklin Garner, Tallahassee, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date February 4, 1969.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is, therefore, denied.
Petitioner's application for attorney's fees is also denied.
ROBERTS, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
ERVIN, C. J., dissents with Opinion.