Case Name: Carl WASILESKI, former attorney for Russell J. Warga, and Russell J. Warga, Appellants, v. Shannon D. WARGA, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2004-03-11
Citations: 867 So. 2d 1220
Docket Number: No. 1D02-2439
Parties: Carl WASILESKI, former attorney for Russell J. Warga, and Russell J. Warga, Appellants, v. Shannon D. WARGA, Appellee.
Judges: BARFIELD, KAHN and HAWKES, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 867
Pages: 1220–1221

Head Matter:
Carl WASILESKI, former attorney for Russell J. Warga, and Russell J. Warga, Appellants, v. Shannon D. WARGA, Appellee.
No. 1D02-2439.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
March 11, 2004.
Carl Wasileski, Titusville, and Russell K. Ramey, Panama City, for Appellants.
Samuel T. Adams, Panama City, for Ap-pellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We find no abuse of discretion in the trial court's determination to impose attorney's fees pursuant to section 57.105, Florida Statutes. We do, however, find error in the apportionment of fees. Accordingly, we vacate that portion of the order and remand with directions that the order require the "attorney's fee to be paid to the [former wife] in equal amounts by the [former husband] and the [former husband's] attorney." § 57.105(1), Fla. Stat. (1999).
AFFIRMED.
BARFIELD, KAHN and HAWKES, JJ., concur.