Case Name: SIMON v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1913-06-11
Citations: 158 S.W. 285
Docket Number: 
Parties: SIMON v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 158
Pages: 285–285

Head Matter:
SIMON v. STATE.
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
June 11, 1913.)
Criminal Law (§ 1090*) — Questions Reviewable — Statement off Facts — Bill of Exceptions.
In the absence of a statement of facts or bill of exceptions, questions raised by a motion for new trial cannot be considered on appeal.
[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2653, 2789, 2803-2822, 2825-2827, 2927, 2928, 2948, 3204; Dec. Dig. § 1090.*]
Appeal from District Court, Tarrant County; R. H. Buck, Judge.
Max Simon was convicted of burglary, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Opinion:
PRENDERGAST, J.
Appellant was convicted of burglary under a proper indictment and charge. There is no statement of facts or bill of exception. No question is raised by the motion for new trial which we can consider in the absence of a statement of facts and bill of exception.
The judgment is affirmed.