Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Suhaily CASTILLO, Defendant-Appellant; United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Suhaily Castillo-Maldonado, True Name Suhaily Maribeth Castillo-Maldonado, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-04-10
Citations: 562 F. App'x 218
Docket Number: Nos. 13-40766, 13-40778
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Suhaily CASTILLO, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Suhaily Castillo-Maldonado, True Name Suhaily Maribeth Castillo-Maldonado, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before JOLLY, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 562
Pages: 218–218

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Suhaily CASTILLO, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Suhaily Castillo-Maldonado, True Name Suhaily Maribeth Castillo-Maldonado, Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 13-40766, 13-40778
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 10, 2014.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Seth Kretzer, Law Offices of Seth Kret-zer, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before JOLLY, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Suhaily Castillo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Castillo has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeals present no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeals are DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Or. R. 47.5.4.