Case Name: Nathaniel DAVIS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2018-08-14
Citations: 553 S.W.3d 899
Docket Number: No. ED 105844
Parties: Nathaniel DAVIS, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Mary K. Hoff, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 553
Pages: 899–900

Head Matter:
Nathaniel DAVIS, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 105844
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
FILED: August 14, 2018
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: Amy Elizabeth Lowe, Office of the State Public Defender, 1000 West Nifong, Bldg. 7, Ste. 100, Columbia, MO 65203.
ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Julia Elizabeth Neidhardt, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.
Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Mary K. Hoff, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Nathaniel Davis appeals from the motion court's "Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Order and Judgment" denying his Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentences, which alleged ineffective assistance of counsel, following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).