Case Name: Nuan Wal CHOY, Petitioner, v. PEKIN RESTAURANT, LaSalle National Insurance Company and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1969-09-24
Citations: 226 So. 2d 804
Docket Number: No. 38836
Parties: Nuan Wal CHOY, Petitioner, v. PEKIN RESTAURANT, LaSalle National Insurance Company and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
Judges: ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, CARLTON and ADKINS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 226
Pages: 804–804

Head Matter:
Nuan Wal CHOY, Petitioner, v. PEKIN RESTAURANT, LaSalle National Insurance Company and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
No. 38836.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Sept. 24, 1969.
Peter S. Schwedocfc of the Law Offices of Howard N. Pelzner, Miami, for petitioner.
Rose & Marlow, Miami, Patrick H. Mears and J. Franklin 'Garner, Tallahassee, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date June 26, 1969.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
Accordingly, the petitions for certiorari and attorney's fee are hereby denied.
It is so ordered.
ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, CARLTON and ADKINS, JJ., concur.