Case Name: Mathew MUSLADIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Anthony LAMARQUE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-10-21
Citations: 427 F.3d 647
Docket Number: No. 03-16653
Parties: Mathew MUSLADIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Anthony LAMARQUE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before REINHARDT, THOMPSON, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 427
Pages: 647–653

Head Matter:
Mathew MUSLADIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Anthony LAMARQUE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 03-16653.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Oct. 21, 2005.
David W. Fermino, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.
Gregory A. Ott, Esq., Office of the California Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, for RespondenNAppellee.
Before REINHARDT, THOMPSON, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
The petition for panel rehearing is DENIED.
The full court was advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc. A judge of the court requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonreeused active judges in favor of en banc reconsideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35. The request for rehearing en banc is DENIED.