Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kevin Jay CROFT, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-12-02
Citations: 302 F. App'x 664
Docket Number: No. 05-30358
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kevin Jay CROFT, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 302
Pages: 664–665

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kevin Jay CROFT, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-30358.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 24, 2008.
Filed Dec. 2, 2008.
Eric B. Wolff, USBI-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Billings, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Kenneth R. Olson, Esq., Olson Law Office, Great Falls, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Kevin Jay Croft appeals from the 90-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and distribution of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 846, possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and distribution of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). In light of the valid appeal waiver, we dismiss.
Croft contends that the appeal waiver in his plea agreement is not enforceable. We conclude that the appeal waiver was knowing and voluntary, see United States v. Navarro-Botello, 912 F.2d 318, 320-22 (9th Cir.1990), and that the waiver precludes our review of Croft's remaining contentions, see United States v. Bibler, 495 F.3d 621, 623-24 (9th Cir.2007).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.