Case Name: Gertrude D. Hawes, Respondent, v. Oliver J. Wells, Appellant, Impleaded with Eliza C. Dunlop and Henry H. Snedeker
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1910-03
Citations: 137 A.D. 906
Docket Number: 
Parties: Gertrude D. Hawes, Respondent, v. Oliver J. Wells, Appellant, Impleaded with Eliza C. Dunlop and Henry H. Snedeker.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 137
Pages: 906–906

Head Matter:
Gertrude D. Hawes, Respondent, v. Oliver J. Wells, Appellant, Impleaded with Eliza C. Dunlop and Henry H. Snedeker.
. Appeal by the defendant Oliver J. Wells from an order entered herein o.n the 2d day of December, 1909, granting plaintiff’s motion to strike out certain portions of the answer of said defendant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
We recently held that this complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute-a cause of action. (See Hawes v. Dunlop, No, 1, 136 App. Div. 629.) Any answer is good enough for a bad complaint. Therefore this answer was good enough. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars Costs. Present — Clarke, McLaughlin, Laughlin, Scott and Dowling, JJ. Order reversed, with tén dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.