Case Name: Charles WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-09-04
Citations: 824 So. 2d 1050
Docket Number: No. 4D01-1305
Parties: Charles WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: WARNER, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 824
Pages: 1050–1050

Head Matter:
Charles WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D01-1305.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Sept. 4, 2002.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Jennifer Brooks, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Susan Odzer Hugentu-gler, Assistant Attorney General, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Although the prosecutor made an unobjected to misstatement of law in closing argument, we conclude that the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt when viewed in the context of the entire closing argument; the considerable number of times during argument where the prosecutor made the correct statement of law; the court's instructions that what the lawyers say is neither evidence nor argument; and the court's proper instructions of the law. See Almeida v. State, 748 So.2d 922, 927 (Fla.1999).
WARNER, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.