Case Name: WILLIAM M. GOYDEN, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, JUDICIARY, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1992-05-20
Citations: 128 N.J. 54
Docket Number: 
Parties: WILLIAM M. GOYDEN, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, JUDICIARY, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: For affirmance — Justices CLIFFORD, POLLOCK, O’HERN and GARIBALDI — 4.
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 128
Pages: 54–58

Head Matter:
607 A.2d 622
WILLIAM M. GOYDEN, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, JUDICIARY, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
Argued March 16, 1992
Decided May 20, 1992.
Gary E. Adams argued the cause for appellant (Pellettieri, Rabstein and Altman, attorneys; Gary E. Adams and E. Elizabeth Sweetser, on the brief).
Michael O’Brien, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Mary C. Jacobson, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 256 KJ.Super. 438, 607 A2d 651 (1991).