Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Luis NAVARRETE-BERMUDEZ, also known as Luis Robles-Rivas, also known as Jose Nava-Bermudez, also known as Gregorio Gonzalez, also known as Jose Luis Beruman, also known as Jose Bermudez-Nava, also known as Gregorio Rodriguez-Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-12-19
Citations: 454 F. App'x 343
Docket Number: No. 11-50380
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Luis NAVARRETE-BERMUDEZ, also known as Luis Robles-Rivas, also known as Jose Nava-Bermudez, also known as Gregorio Gonzalez, also known as Jose Luis Beruman, also known as Jose Bermudez-Nava, also known as Gregorio Rodriguez-Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 454
Pages: 343–343

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Luis NAVARRETE-BERMUDEZ, also known as Luis Robles-Rivas, also known as Jose Nava-Bermudez, also known as Gregorio Gonzalez, also known as Jose Luis Beruman, also known as Jose Bermudez-Nava, also known as Gregorio Rodriguez-Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-50380
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 19, 2011.
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Judy Fulmer Madewell, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Henry Joseph Bemporad, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before KING, HAYNES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Luis Navarrete-Bermudez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Navarrete-Bermudez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.