Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven FLOREZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-06-20
Citations: 231 F. App'x 400
Docket Number: No. 06-51222
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven FLOREZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 231
Pages: 400–400

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven FLOREZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-51222
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
June 20, 2007.
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Robert R. Harris, El Paso, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Steven Florez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Florez has filed a response and a motion for a writ of coram nobis. The motion for writ of coram nobis is DENIED. Our independent review of the record, counsel's brief, and Florez's response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Florez's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. See United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir.2006). Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.