Case Name: D.O., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. T.B., R.B. AND B.R.B., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1998-12-29
Citations: 317 N.J. Super. 323
Docket Number: 
Parties: D.O., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. T.B., R.B. AND B.R.B., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 317
Pages: 323–324

Head Matter:
722 A.2d 114
D.O., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. T.B., R.B. AND B.R.B., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued December 2, 1998
Decided December 29, 1998.
Before Judges KING, WALLACE and NEWMAN.
David J. Weaver argued the cause for appellant (Trapasso, Dolan & Hollander, attorneys; John D. Williams, on the brief).
S.M. Chris Franzblau argued the cause for respondents (Franzblau Dratch, attorneys; Mr. Franzblau, on the brief).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm Judge Conforti's decision dismissing the complaint for the reasons expressed in his written opinion of November 7, 1997. He soundly exercised his discretion in rejecting plaintiffs claimed right to subject involuntarily his alleged adult offspring to genetic blood testing. See M.F. v. N.H., 252 N.J.Super. 420, 429, 599 A.2d 1297 (App.Div.1991); see also Michael H. v. Gerald D., 491 U.S. 110, 124, 109 S.Ct. 2333, 105 L.Ed.2d 91, 106 (1989).