Case Name: Edurado B. RAMIREZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-09-19
Citations: 566 So. 2d 939
Docket Number: No. 90-1928
Parties: Edurado B. RAMIREZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and WARNER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 566
Pages: 939–940

Head Matter:
Edurado B. RAMIREZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 90-1928.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Sept. 19, 1990.
Edurado B. Ramirez, Belle Glade, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Joan Fowler, Asst. State Atty., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The trial court summarily denied appellant's 3.850 motion on the ground that although the motion was under oath, the appellant had incorporated four pages of facts which were not under oath, citing Daniels v. State, 450 So.2d 601 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). However, unlike Daniels, the factual recitation here was not part of a separate pleading but was part of the motion itself, being a lengthy recitation of the facts upon which the motion was based. The verification clause states that all facts set forth are true and correct. Thus, the motion properly comports with Scott v. State, 464 So.2d 1171 (Fla.1985), and summary denial based on Daniels was error. This cause is therefore reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and WARNER, JJ., concur.