Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Richard JACOBS, Defendant/Appellant; Richard JACOBS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1994-03-08
Citations: 874 S.W.2d 506
Docket Number: Nos. 62831, 64519
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Richard JACOBS, Defendant/Appellant. Richard JACOBS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before GRIMM, P.J., CARL R. GAERTNER and AHRENS, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 874
Pages: 506–507

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Richard JACOBS, Defendant/Appellant. Richard JACOBS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Nos. 62831, 64519.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
March 8, 1994.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 7, 1994.
Application to Transfer Denied May 26, 1994.
Michael A. Gross, St. Louis, for defendant/appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff/respondent.
Before GRIMM, P.J., CARL R. GAERTNER and AHRENS, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
A jury convicted defendant of felony stealing in violation of § 570.030, RSMo 1986. The court sentenced defendant to pay a fine of $1000. Defendant raises three points on direct appeal. He also raises two points concerning the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgments are affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).