Case Name: Thomas James HARRELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. George E. CURRIE; James Chapell; Correctional Officer Harris; Correctional Officer Vinson; Sergeant McRae, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-12-05
Citations: 82 F. App'x 85
Docket Number: No. 03-7527
Parties: Thomas James HARRELL, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. George E. CURRIE; James Chapell; Correctional Officer Harris; Correctional Officer Vinson; Sergeant McRae, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 82
Pages: 85–86

Head Matter:
Thomas James HARRELL, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. George E. CURRIE; James Chapell; Correctional Officer Harris; Correctional Officer Vinson; Sergeant McRae, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 03-7527.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 19, 2003.
Decided Dec. 5, 2003.
Thomas James Harrell, Appellant pro se.
Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Thomas James Harrell appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Harrell v. Currie, No. CA-03-597-5 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 17, 2003). We dis pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED