Case Name: Lonnie SNELLING, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA, INC., Lou Fusz Motor Company, and General Motors Corporation, Defendants/Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-05-04
Citations: 996 S.W.2d 605
Docket Number: No. 75160
Parties: Lonnie SNELLING, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA, INC., Lou Fusz Motor Company, and General Motors Corporation, Defendants/Respondents.
Judges: Before: MARY K. HOFF, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, J. and RHODES RUSSELL, J. .
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 996
Pages: 605–605

Head Matter:
Lonnie SNELLING, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA, INC., Lou Fusz Motor Company, and General Motors Corporation, Defendants/Respondents.
No. 75160.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
May 4, 1999.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied June 3, 1999.
Application for Transfer Denied Aug. 24, 1999.
Lonnie.Snelling, St. Louis, pro se.
Chuck N. Chionuma, Kansas City, Jay L. Kanzler, Jr., Louis J. Basso, St. Louis, for respondents.
Before: MARY K. HOFF, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, J. and RHODES RUSSELL, J. .

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Lonnie Snelling ("plaintiff') appeals the judgment dismissing his petition with prejudice as the claims therein were barred under principles of res judicata.
Plaintiffs brief fails to comply with Rule 84.04. Therefore, nothing is preserved for review. See Luft v. Schoenhoff, 935 S.W.2d 685, 687 (Mo.App.1996); Snelling v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 859 S.W.2d 755, 756 (Mo.App.1993).
Respondents' motions to dismiss are denied. Plaintiffs motion to strike respondents' briefs is also denied.
Appeal dismissed.