Case Name: Harold HENDERSON v. Fred D. DAVIS III, Judge
Court: Arkansas Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Arkansas
Decision Date: 1991-11-04
Citations: 307 Ark. 170
Docket Number: 91-93
Parties: Harold HENDERSON v. Fred D. DAVIS III, Judge
Judges: 
Reporter: Arkansas Reports
Volume: 307
Pages: 170–171

Head Matter:
Harold HENDERSON v. Fred D. DAVIS III, Judge
91-93
816 S.W.2d 612
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Opinion delivered November 4, 1991
Appellant, pro se.
No response.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The petitioner, Harold Henderson, asks the court to reconsider his motion to have the Attorney General print his pro se brief. This court has twice denied the same motion on June 17, 1991, and again on October 14, 1991.
This is a civil case and Henderson has not made the requisite showing that his suit has merit. See Glick v. Lockhart, 218 Ark. 417, 706 S.W.2d 178 (1986).
The appellant continues to file pleadings in this court concerning the printing of his pro se brief, which are without merit and which are burdensome to the administrative affairs of the court. The clerk is therefore directed to dismiss this motion for reconsideration and to accept no further filings by Harold Henderson in this regard.
It is so ordered.