Case Name: CONCREFORM COMPANY, Inc., et al., Petitioners, v. John VAN DORN et al., Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1968-10-09
Citations: 214 So. 2d 724
Docket Number: No. 37543
Parties: CONCREFORM COMPANY, Inc., et al., Petitioners, v. John VAN DORN et al., Respondents.
Judges: ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, ERVIN and HOPPING, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 214
Pages: 724–725

Head Matter:
CONCREFORM COMPANY, Inc., et al., Petitioners, v. John VAN DORN et al., Respondents.
No. 37543.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Oct. 9, 1968.
Rose & Marlow, Miami, for petitioners.
Jules R. Israel, Miami, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lake-land, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date April 26, 1968.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, records and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
Accordingly, the petition for certorari is denied.
It is so ordered.
ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, ERVIN and HOPPING, JJ., concur.