Case Name: MAYOR AND ALDERMEN OF JERSEY CITY, RESPONDENT, v. SIMON BLUM, COLLECTOR OF TAXES, ET AL., APPELLANTS
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1925-01-19
Citations: 101 N.J.L. 220
Docket Number: 
Parties: MAYOR AND ALDERMEN OF JERSEY CITY, RESPONDENT, v. SIMON BLUM, COLLECTOR OF TAXES, ET AL., APPELLANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 101
Pages: 220–220

Head Matter:
MAYOR AND ALDERMEN OF JERSEY CITY, RESPONDENT, v. SIMON BLUM, COLLECTOR OF TAXES, ET AL., APPELLANTS.
Argued October 29, 1924
Decided January 19, 1925.
Por the respondent, Thomas J. Brogan.
Eor the appellants, Nathaniel G. Tams.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review will be modified, for the reasons and to the extent stated at length in an opinion promulgated at the present term, in a case in which the same litigants were involved.
For reversal — Black, Yak Buskiek, Kays, JJ. 3.
For modification — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Paekee, Mintuen, Katzenbach, Lloyd, Claek, JJ. 7.