Case Name: Samuel Stern, Plaintiff, v. Solomon Krautman, Also Known as Elias Krautman, and Others, Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1922-09
Citations: 119 Misc. 288
Docket Number: 
Parties: Samuel Stern, Plaintiff, v. Solomon Krautman, Also Known as Elias Krautman, and Others, Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 119
Pages: 288–288

Head Matter:
Samuel Stern, Plaintiff, v. Solomon Krautman, Also Known as Elias Krautman, and Others, Defendants.
Supreme Court, New York Special Term,
September, 1922.
Pleading — when cannot be amended as of course — Civil Pr. Act, § 244.
Since section 244 of the Civil Practice Act went into effect a pleader has not the right to amend as of course within twenty days after the service of the answer or reply to his original pleading.
Motion for leave to serve an amended complaint.
Charles L. Hoffman and Henry A. Friedman, for plaintiff.
Max Silverstein, for defendants.
See Laws of 1923, chap. 12, in effect February 27, 1923.

Opinion:
Wasservogel, J.
Plaintiff overlooks an important change effected by section 244 of the Civil Practice Act, relating to the service of amended pleadings as a matter of course. Under section 542 of the Code of Civil Procedure the right to amend as a matter of course was permitted, first, within twenty days after the service of a party's own pleading, and, second, within twenty days after an answer, demurrer or reply thereto was served. Under section 244 of the Civil Practice Act, however, the second period has been eliminated and the pleader has not now the right to amend as a matter of course within twenty days after the service of the answer or reply to his original pleading. It, therefore, follows that the plaintiff is in default in serving the amended complaint. The motion will, however, be granted to the extent of giving leave to plaintiff to serve an amended complaint upon payment of ten dollars costs within ten days.
Ordered accordingly.