Case Name: Blatt Appeal
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1964-05-27
Citations: 414 Pa. 449
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 303
Parties: Blatt Appeal.
Judges: Before Bell, C. J., Jones, Eagen, O’Brien and Roberts, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 414
Pages: 449–451

Head Matter:
Blatt Appeal.
Argued May 25, 1964.
Before Bell, C. J., Jones, Eagen, O’Brien and Roberts, JJ.
Philip P. Kalodner, with him Gregory M. Harvey, for appellants.
Abraham E. Freedman, with him Benjamin R. Donolow, for Democratic County Executive Committee of Philadelphia, appellee.
Levy Anderson, First Deputy City Solicitor, with him Edward G. Bauer, Jr., City Solicitor, for County Board of Elections.
May 27, 1964:

Opinion:
Opinion
Per Curiam,
We are all of the opinion that a challenge to an absentee ballot which gives as the basis therefor one of the grounds enumerated in §1308 of the Pennsylvania Election Code, June 3, 1937, P. L. 1333, added, March 6,1951, P. L. 3, §11, as amended, August 13, 1963, P. L. 707, §24, 25 P.S. §3146.8 (Supp. 1963), and is substantially in the language thereof, is sufficient to require that a hearing be held thereon in conformity with that section of the Code. There is no requirement in the Election Code that a challenge to an absentee ballot be supported, at the time of challenge or prior to hearing, by an affidavit or memorandum. Furthermore, this record discloses a sufficient and adequate challenge under the law to require a hearing by the Board of Elections on the validity of the challenged ballots.
The order below is reversed and the County Board of Elections is directed to hold a hearing on each challenged absentee ballot in conformity with the provisions of §1308 of the Election Code, as amended.
Mr. Justice Musmanno and Mr. Justice Cohen took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.