Case Name: PUTERBAUGH v. PUTERBAUGH
Court: Michigan Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Michigan
Decision Date: 1934-10-23
Citations: 269 Mich. 167
Docket Number: Docket No. 82; Calendar No. 37,836
Parties: PUTERBAUGH v. PUTERBAUGH.
Judges: Nelson Sharpe, C. J. and Potter, Fead, Wiest, Bittzel, Bushnell, and Edward M. Sharpe, JJ., concurred.
Reporter: Michigan Reports
Volume: 269
Pages: 167–168

Head Matter:
PUTERBAUGH v. PUTERBAUGH.
Divorce—Appeal and Error—Record—Assault.
Decree granting wife divorce, custody of children, alimony and support money is affirmed on appeal where no good reason is disclosed by the record for disturbing it' and circuit court found charge that husband had committed a reprehensible and wholly unjustifiable assault upon her was sustained by the testimony.
Appeal from Sanilac; Boomhower (Xenophon A.), J.
Submitted June 8, 1934.
(Docket No. 82, Calendar No. 37,836.)
Decided October 23, 1934.
Bill by Ethel Puterbaugh against Ryerson Puterbaugh. for divorce on ground of extreme cruelty. Cross-bill by defendant for divorce on ground of extreme cruelty. Decree for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
Affirmed.
C. Warner Rigney (Robert W. McKenzie, of counsel), for plaintiff.
Paul Woodivorth, for defendant.

Opinion:
North, J.
This is an appeal by the defendant husband from a decree granting a divorce from the bonds of matrimony to the wife, awarding her custody of three minor children born of the marriage, and also awarding plaintiff alimony and support for the children.
Plaintiff charg-ed defendant with extreme cruelty. Defendant in a cross-bill likewise charged plaintiff with extreme cruelty. The parties were married in September, 1925. They separated approximately seven years later. The wife left the home, took the three minor children with her and returned to the home of her parents. The case was heard in open court nearly a year after the separation. There is decided conflict in the testimony given by and in behalf of the respective parties. Because it would serve no purpose we forego detailed review. Suffice it to say that since the parties and their witnesses appeared in person before the trial judge he was in a far better position than we to determine relative credibility of the litigants and witnesses; and on this record we are content to accept his decision. Plaintiff charges that her husband committed upon her a most reprehensible and wholly unjustifiable assault, and the circuit judge found this charge sustained by the testimony. Careful review of this record discloses no good reason for disturbing the decree granting the divorce or the provisions therein contained as to custody of children, alimony and support money. There is no merit in defendant's complaint relative to plaintiff having been permitted by the circuit judge to amend her bill of complaint. The decree granted is affirmed, with costs to appellee.
Nelson Sharpe, C. J. and Potter, Fead, Wiest, Bittzel, Bushnell, and Edward M. Sharpe, JJ., concurred.