Case Name: Manuel MONTES-HERNANDEZ, a.k.a. Simon Pedro Ramirez, a.k.a. Simon Pedro Ramirez-Cruz, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-03-25
Citations: 514 F. App'x 666
Docket Number: No. 12-71007
Parties: Manuel MONTES-HERNANDEZ, a.k.a. Simon Pedro Ramirez, a.k.a. Simon Pedro Ramirez-Cruz, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 514
Pages: 666–667

Head Matter:
Manuel MONTES-HERNANDEZ, a.k.a. Simon Pedro Ramirez, a.k.a. Simon Pedro Ramirez-Cruz, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 12-71007.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 12, 2013.
Filed March 25, 2013.
Simon Pedro Ramirez-Cruz, Lancaster, CA, pro se.
Brendan Paul Hogan, Esquire, OIL, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
Before: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Manuel Montes-Hernandez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge's decision denying him a continuance. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the agency's denial of a continuance. Ahmed v. Holder, 569 F.3d 1009, 1012 (9th Cir.2009). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.
The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Montes-Hernandez's request for a continuance for failure to show good cause where Montes-Hernandez had already been granted three continuances for the purpose of preparing and filing a U visa application. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.29 (an immigration judge may grant a motion for a continuance for good cause shown); Ahmed, 569 F.3d at 1012-14.
To the extent Montes-Hernandez seeks review of the agency's denial of bond, we lack jurisdiction to review this decision. See 8 U.S.C. § 1226(e).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.