Case Name: David Laron TASH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Derral G. ADAMS, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-08-04
Citations: 140 F. App'x 744
Docket Number: No. 03-16290; D.C. No. CV-02-06233-SMS
Parties: David Laron TASH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Derral G. ADAMS, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before O’SCANNLAIN, CALLAHAN and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 140
Pages: 744–744

Head Matter:
David Laron TASH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Derral G. ADAMS, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 03-16290.
D.C. No. CV-02-06233-SMS.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 1, 2005.
Decided Aug. 4, 2005.
Katherine Hart, Esq., Law Office of Katherine Hart, Fresno, CA, for Petitioner — Appellant.
Raymond Brosterhous, II, AGCA — Office of the California Attorney General (SAC) Department of Justice, Sacramento, CA, for Respondent — Appellee.
Before O’SCANNLAIN, CALLAHAN and BEA, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
California state prisoner David Laron Tash appeals the district court's order denying his motion to stay proceedings in his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 case pending exhaustion of other claims in state court.
The order Tash seeks to appeal is not final and appealable. See, e.g., National Distrib. Agency v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 117 F.3d 432, 433 (9th Cir.1997). Accordingly, we dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253; cf. Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections of Ill., 434 U.S. 257, 265, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.