Case Name: JAMES FRANCIS MORGAN, BY HIS NEXT FRIEND AND MOTHER, BESSIE HICKSTEIN MORGAN, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT, v. SUSINO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, PROSECUTOR-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1944-03-23
Citations: 131 N.J.L. 329
Docket Number: 
Parties: JAMES FRANCIS MORGAN, BY HIS NEXT FRIEND AND MOTHER, BESSIE HICKSTEIN MORGAN, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT, v. SUSINO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, PROSECUTOR-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 131
Pages: 329–330

Head Matter:
JAMES FRANCIS MORGAN, BY HIS NEXT FRIEND AND MOTHER, BESSIE HICKSTEIN MORGAN, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT, v. SUSINO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, PROSECUTOR-APPELLANT.
Argued February 3, 1944
Decided March 23, 1944.
For the respondent, Hodes & Hodes (Irving L. Hodes).
For the appellant, Thomas J. Brett and Edwin Joseph O’Brien.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for tlie reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Chief Justice in the Supreme Court; reserving, however, any expression as to the rights of an unborn child not within the statutory provision. See Stemmer v. Kline, 128 N. J. L. 455.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Case, Donges, Perskie, Porter, Dear, Hague, Thompson, Dill, JJ. 10.
For reversal — Heiier, Wells, Raeeerty, JJ. 3.