Case Name: Jesse James JETER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PALMETTO HEALTH, doing business as Palmetto Health Internal Medicine Center, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-03-29
Citations: 515 F. App'x 234
Docket Number: No. 13-1018
Parties: Jesse James JETER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PALMETTO HEALTH, doing business as Palmetto Health Internal Medicine Center, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before DUNCAN, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 515
Pages: 234–234

Head Matter:
Jesse James JETER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PALMETTO HEALTH, doing business as Palmetto Health Internal Medicine Center, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 13-1018.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 26, 2013.
Decided: March 29, 2013.
Jesse James Jeter, Appellant Pro Se. Mason Abram Summers, Richardson, Plowden & Robinson, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before DUNCAN, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jesse James Jeter appeals the district court's order accepting in part the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment against Jet-er's claims, which arose under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C.A. § 12101-12213 (West 2005 & Supp.2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jeter v. Palmetto Health, No. 3:10-cv-02832-CMC, 2012 WL 6521454 (D.S.C. Dec. 14, 2012). To the extent that Jeter's informal reply brief contains a motion to amend a motion that he had previously filed in the district court, we deny his request. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.