Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julio MEDINA-MENDOZA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-11-22
Citations: 51 F. App'x 201
Docket Number: No. 01-50249; D.C. No. CR-98-00904-CBM-01
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Julio MEDINA-MENDOZA, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 51
Pages: 201–202

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Julio MEDINA-MENDOZA, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 01-50249.
D.C. No. CR-98-00904-CBM-01.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Nov. 18, 2002.
Nov. 22, 2002.
Before REINHARDT, RYMER, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Julio Medina-Mendoza appeals from his conviction and sentence for illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Medina-Mendoza's counsel has filed a motion pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating there are no arguable issues for review and seeking to withdraw as counsel of record. Mendoza has not filed a pro se supplemental brief. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no issues for review. Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.