Case Name: Oliver M. BOND and Herta R. Bond, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. OCTAGON PROCESS, INC., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1991-03-28
Citations: 926 F.2d 1573
Docket Number: No. 90-8898
Parties: Oliver M. BOND and Herta R. Bond, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. OCTAGON PROCESS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, DUBINA, Circuit Judge, and HENDERSON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 926
Pages: 1573–1574

Head Matter:
Oliver M. BOND and Herta R. Bond, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. OCTAGON PROCESS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 90-8898.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
March 28, 1991.
E. Freeman Leverett, Heard, Leverett, Adams and Phelps, P.C., Elberton, Ga., for plaintiffs-appellants.
Carl R. Woodward, III, Carella, Byrne, Bain, Gilfillan, Cecehi & Stewart, Roseland, N.J. and Peter J. Anderson, Peterson, Dillard, Young Self & Asselin, Atlanta, Ga., for defendant-appellee.
Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, DUBINA, Circuit Judge, and HENDERSON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of the district court is affirmed on the basis of the district court's dispositive opinion, which is reported as Bond v. Octagon Process, Inc., 745 F.Supp. 710 (M.D.Ga.1990).
AFFIRMED.