Case Name: STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Movant, v. Leo C. PINKSTON, Defendant.
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 2018-02-27
Citations: 179 A.3d 1053
Docket Number: M–806 September Term 2017; 080118
Parties: STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Movant,
v.
Leo C. PINKSTON, Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 179
Pages: 1053–1053

Head Matter:
STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Movant,
v.
Leo C. PINKSTON, Defendant.
M-806 September Term 2017
080118
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
February 27, 2018
ORDER

Opinion:
The Court having determined that the appeal raises an issue of public importance that is capable of repetition yet evades review, it is ORDERED that the motion to dismiss is denied; and it is further
ORDERED that, with the agreement of defendant and the State, the trial court is authorized to proceed with sentencing.