Case Name: Ann G. Pennington, Respondent, v. Edmund Ziman, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1961-05-29
Citations: 13 A.D.2d 769
Docket Number: 
Parties: Ann G. Pennington, Respondent, v. Edmund Ziman, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 13
Pages: 769–769

Head Matter:
Ann G. Pennington, Respondent, v. Edmund Ziman, Appellant.

Opinion:
Order entered on July 28, 1960, denying defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint under rule 106 and subdivision 4 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellant, and the motion granted, with $10 costs, with leave, however, for the plaintiff-respondent to replead, if so advised, upon a showing by allegation of ultimate facts that a rescission of the agreement would accomplish some proper purpose, since equity will not suffer the making of a vain arder. (Cf. Sivakoff v. Sivakoff, 280 App. Div. 106, 108.) Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.