Case Name: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Darrell MYERS, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2016-02-03
Citations: 131 A.3d 480
Docket Number: 
Parties: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Darrell MYERS, Respondent.
Judges: Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 131
Pages: 480–480

Head Matter:
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Darrell MYERS, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Feb. 3, 2016.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 3rd day of February, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
Did the Superior Court err in holding, in a published decision, that a warrant was required to obtain blood for a chemical test where . the officer had probable cause to believe that the [Respondent] was driving under the influence of alcohol or a controlled substance, and [Respondent], did not affirmatively refuse consent?
Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.