Case Name: ANTHIME DOWNING, RESPONDENT, v. OXWELD ACETYLENE COMPANY, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1934-09-27
Citations: 113 N.J.L. 399
Docket Number: 
Parties: ANTHIME DOWNING, RESPONDENT, v. OXWELD ACETYLENE COMPANY, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 113
Pages: 399–399

Head Matter:
ANTHIME DOWNING, RESPONDENT, v. OXWELD ACETYLENE COMPANY, APPELLANT.
Argued May 17, 1934
— Decided September 27, 1934.
Ror the respondent, Edward G. Burice.
Ror the appellant, Kellogg & Chance.

Opinion:
Pee Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Peeskie, Yan Buskibk, Kays, Deae, JJ. 9.
For reversal — Case, Heteield, Wells, JJ. 3.