Case Name: Adam E. YOUNG, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1996-07-23
Citations: 925 S.W.2d 505
Docket Number: No. WD 51392
Parties: Adam E. YOUNG, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before ULRICH, C.J., and FENNER and BRECKENRIDGE, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 925
Pages: 505–506

Head Matter:
Adam E. YOUNG, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 51392.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
July 23, 1996.
Susan L. Hogan, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before ULRICH, C.J., and FENNER and BRECKENRIDGE, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Adam Young appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. He claims the trial court erred in denying his motion because trial counsel was ineffective for refusing to allow him to testify.
Judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).