Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Randy Joe AMELUNKE, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-03-07
Citations: 894 S.W.2d 231
Docket Number: No. 65769
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Randy Joe AMELUNKE, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 894
Pages: 231–232

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Randy Joe AMELUNKE, Defendant/Appellant.
No. 65769.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
March 7, 1995.
Craig Allen Johnston, Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Traci J. Sanders, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals his conviction from a bench trial for the offense of manufacturing more than five grams of marijuana, a controlled substance, § 195.211, RSMo Cum. Supp.1992. Defendant claims that evidence was seized pursuant to a search warrant in which the affidavit in support was insufficient to establish probable cause for the issuance of the warrant, and, therefore, the evidence should not have been admitted. We affirm the trial court. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no prece-dential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. Rule 30.25(b).