Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wendell Edward BETANCOURT, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-10-07
Citations: 145 F. App'x 422
Docket Number: No. 05-6693
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wendell Edward BETANCOURT, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 145
Pages: 422–423

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wendell Edward BETANCOURT, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-6693.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 29, 2005.
Decided Oct. 7, 2005.
Wendell Edward Betancourt, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Wendell E. Betancourt appeals for the second time the district court's December 13, 2004, order denying his motion for recusal. We deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal as duplicative because this court previously disposed of his first appeal from the same order. See United States v. Betancourt, 128 Fed. Appx. 335 (4th Cir.2005) (unpublished). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED