Case Name: MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, WORKERS COMPENSATION CARRIER, Appellant, v. Leotis BROWN, Carlisle Construction Company, Inc., Coutinho Construction Company, Inc., etc., et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-04-18
Citations: 559 So. 2d 111
Docket Number: No. 88-3200
Parties: MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, WORKERS COMPENSATION CARRIER, Appellant, v. Leotis BROWN, Carlisle Construction Company, Inc., Coutinho Construction Company, Inc., etc., et al., Appellees.
Judges: GLICKSTEIN, GUNTHER and GARRETT, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 559
Pages: 111–111

Head Matter:
MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, WORKERS COMPENSATION CARRIER, Appellant, v. Leotis BROWN, Carlisle Construction Company, Inc., Coutinho Construction Company, Inc., etc., et al., Appellees.
No. 88-3200.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
April 18, 1990.
Neil J. Hayes of Neil J. Hayes, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Philip M. Burlington of Edna L. Caruso, P.A., and Moses Baker, Jr., of Searcy & Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the order which determined appellant's worker's compensation lien and remand with direction to conduct an eviden-tiary hearing upon proper written notice.
The panel which heard this appeal has concluded the issue of inadequate notice to be dispositive and has not reached the remaining issue.
GLICKSTEIN, GUNTHER and GARRETT, JJ., concur.