Case Name: In the Interest of R.P.J.G, Juvenile Officer, Respondents, v. L.J.G. (Mother), Appellant, J.K.G., Jr. a/k/a J.G. (Putative Father) and John Doe (Putative Father) Defendants
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2007-12-11
Citations: 240 S.W.3d 197
Docket Number: No. WD 68358
Parties: In the Interest of R.P.J.G, Juvenile Officer, Respondents, v. L.J.G. (Mother), Appellant, J.K.G., Jr. a/k/a J.G. (Putative Father) and John Doe (Putative Father) Defendants.
Judges: Before LOWENSTEIN, P.J., ELLIS and NEWTON, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 240
Pages: 197–198

Head Matter:
In the Interest of R.P.J.G, Juvenile Officer, Respondents, v. L.J.G. (Mother), Appellant, J.K.G., Jr. a/k/a J.G. (Putative Father) and John Doe (Putative Father) Defendants.
No. WD 68358.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Dec. 11, 2007.
Jeanne M. Gordon, Esq., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Scott Hamblin, Esq., Jefferson City, MO, for L.J.G.
Mary J. Browning, Esq., Jefferson City, MO, Guardian for R.P.J.G.
Before LOWENSTEIN, P.J., ELLIS and NEWTON, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Mother appeals the termination of her parental rights with regard to Child. After a thorough review of the record, this court concludes that the trial court's findings are supported by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence, that the termination was in the best interests of Child, and that the rendering court had jurisdiction to enter judgment. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. A memorandum explaining the reasoning behind this decision has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).