Case Name: Pauline IM; et al., Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-06-19
Citations: 350 F. App'x 101
Docket Number: No. 05-70027
Parties: Pauline IM; et al., Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: B. FLETCHER, SILER, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 350
Pages: 101–101

Head Matter:
Pauline IM; et al., Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 05-70027.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
June 19, 2009.
Emmanuel Eke Enyinwa, Esquire, Law Office of Emmanuel Enyinwa, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioners.
Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Blair O’Connor, Assistant Director, OIL, Donald E. Keener, Esquire, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice Civil Division/Office of Immigration, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: B. FLETCHER, SILER, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
The Honorable Eugene E. Siler, Jr., Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
ORDER
The pending petition for rehearing en banc is DISMISSED as moot in light of the simultaneous filing of a memorandum disposition replacing the previously withdrawn opinion in this matter. The parties may file new petitions as to the memorandum disposition for rehearing or rehearing en banc in accordance with the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.