Case Name: Hollice LaFLEUR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1997-04-16
Citations: 773 So. 2d 562
Docket Number: No. 96-669
Parties: Hollice LaFLEUR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and JORGENSON and SHEVIN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 773
Pages: 562–562

Head Matter:
Hollice LaFLEUR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 96-669.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 16, 1997.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Louis Campbell, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Douglas Gurnic (Fort Lauderdale), Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and JORGENSON and SHEVIN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from the resentencing required by LaFleur v. State, 661 So.2d 346 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). While the appellant's only substantive point, that the successor sentencing judge should have been disqualified, has no merit, we agree with both parties that the sentencing documents should be clarified so as to reflect unequivocally that the minimum mandatory term imposed for counts I, II, and III are concurrent not only with each other, but, with those imposed for counts IV and V. LaFleur, 661 So.2d at 349-50. The cause is remanded solely to accomplish this purpose.
Affirmed, remanded.
. LaFleur need not be present at the post-remand proceedings below.