Case Name: Ruth FLOYD, Employee/Appellant, v. McMILLAN/McGRAW-HILL, Employer/Respondent, and Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co., Insurer/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1997-12-16
Citations: 957 S.W.2d 500
Docket Number: No. 72284
Parties: Ruth FLOYD, Employee/Appellant, v. McMILLAN/McGRAW-HILL, Employer/Respondent, and Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co., Insurer/Respondent.
Judges: Before AHRENS, P.J., and CRANDALL and KAROHL, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 957
Pages: 500–501

Head Matter:
Ruth FLOYD, Employee/Appellant, v. McMILLAN/McGRAW-HILL, Employer/Respondent, and Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co., Insurer/Respondent.
No. 72284.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Dec. 16, 1997.
Appleton, Kretmar, Beatty & Stolze, Evan J. Beatty, St. Louis, for appellant.
Law Offices of James W. Reeves, Jeffrey J. Estes, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before AHRENS, P.J., and CRANDALL and KAROHL, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission is supported by substantial and competent evidence. An extended opinion would not have precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).