Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sarah Darlene SONNIER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-10-25
Citations: 203 F. App'x 624
Docket Number: No. 05-30787
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sarah Darlene SONNIER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 203
Pages: 624–624

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sarah Darlene SONNIER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-30787
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Oct. 25, 2006.
Camille Ann Domingue, Brett L. Gray-son, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Rebecca L. Hudsmith, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Sarah Darlene Sonnier, federal prisoner # 11903-035, pleaded guilty to interstate travel in aid of unlawful activity and was sentenced to 57 months of imprisonment and two years of supervised release. She appeals the district court's denial of the 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion challenging her sentence. The district court granted a certificate of appealability. Sonnier argues that her sentence was imposed in violation of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), and that Booker applies retroactively on collateral review. Sonnier concedes that her argument is foreclosed by circuit precedent, but raises it to preserve further review. In United States v. Gentry, 432 F.3d 600, 604 (5th Cir.2005), we held that Booker is not retroactively applicable to initial § 2255 motions.
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.