Case Name: IN RE: James Karim MUHAMMAD, aka James Conway, Debtor. James Karim Muhammad, Appellant, v. North Richmond Senior Housing, Inc., Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-12-21
Citations: 671 F. App'x 687
Docket Number: No. 15-60036
Parties: IN RE: James Karim MUHAMMAD, aka James Conway, Debtor. James Karim Muhammad, Appellant, v. North Richmond Senior Housing, Inc., Appellee.
Judges: Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Bankruptcy Reporter
Volume: 568
Pages: 687–688

Head Matter:
IN RE: James Karim MUHAMMAD, aka James Conway, Debtor. James Karim Muhammad, Appellant, v. North Richmond Senior Housing, Inc., Appellee.
No. 15-60036
TJnited States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted December 14, 2016
Filed December 21, 2016
James Karim Muhammad, Pro Se
Steven J. Mehlman, Kenneth D. Schnur, Attorney, Kimball Tirey & St. John LLP, Walnut Creek, CA, for Appellee
Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App, P, 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
James Karim Muhammad appeals pro se from an order of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel ("BAP") dismissing his bankruptcy appeal as untimely. We have jurisdiction under 28- U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de novo. Delaney v. Alexander (In, re Delaney), 29 F.3d 516, 517 (9th Cir. 1994). We affirm.
The BAP correctly dismissed Muhammad's appeal because Muhammad failed to file the notice of appeal with the bankruptcy clerk within 14 'days of entry of the order being appealed as required by Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8002(a)(1). See 11 U.S.C. § 158(c)(2) (an appeal to the BAP or district court from a bankruptcy court must be taken within the time provided by Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8002); Anderson v. Mouradick (In re Mouradick), 13 F.3d 326, 327 (9th Cir. 1994) ("The provisions of Bankruptcy Rule 8002 are jurisdictional...."); see also Ramsey v. Ramsey (In re Ramsey), 612 F.2d 1220, 1223 (9th Cir. 1980) (declining to adopt a "mailbox rule" for Rule 8002(a) appeals).
Muhammad's pending motions are denied as moot.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.