Case Name: DISKEN et al. v. TOPLITZ et al.
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1909-12-03
Citations: 119 N.Y.S. 1123
Docket Number: 
Parties: DISKEN et al. v. TOPLITZ et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 119
Pages: 1123–1123

Head Matter:
DISKEN et al. v. TOPLITZ et al.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
December 3, 1909.)
Appeal from Special Term, New York County. Action by Loretta N. Dis-ten and others against Harry L. Toplitz and others. From the judgment, defendants appeal.
Modified, and, as modified, affirmed.
Charles Goldzier, for appellants.
John Frankenheimer, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The judgment appealed from •should be modified, by deducting from the recovery of the plaintiffs 8165 allowed for replastering on account of leakage, and also by deducting the interest allowed on plaintiffs' recovery. As so modified, the judgment should he affirmed, without costs.