Case Name: Angel JOMOLLA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2009-09-16
Citations: 19 So. 3d 415
Docket Number: No. 3D09-1442
Parties: Angel JOMOLLA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before GERSTEN and CORTIÑAS, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 19
Pages: 415–415

Head Matter:
Angel JOMOLLA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D09-1442.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Sept. 16, 2009.
Angel Jomolla, in proper person.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before GERSTEN and CORTIÑAS, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Reyes v. State, 920 So.2d 1171 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (holding that where results would not have been different but for counsel's error, the defendant has not proven prejudice as required under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984)); see also Jomolla v. State, 990 So.2d 1234, 1238 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (finding that the State did not argue the erroneous theory or rely upon it in the prosecution's case).