Case Name: In the Matter of J. Jay VANDERGRIFT. Marjorie Holmes Vandergrift, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1965-03-04
Citations: 341 F.2d 921
Docket Number: No. 14999
Parties: In the Matter of J. Jay VANDERGRIFT. Marjorie Holmes Vandergrift, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 341
Pages: 921–921

Head Matter:
In the Matter of J. Jay VANDERGRIFT. Marjorie Holmes Vandergrift, Appellant.
No. 14999.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued Feb. 19, 1965.
Decided March 4, 1965.
Howard I. Scott and Kountz, Fry & Meyer, Pittsburgh, Pa. (A. E. Kountz, Lawrence B. Niemann, Tice F. Ryan, Jr., and Ryan, Newman Geer & Goldring, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.
Henry C. Herchenroether, Jr., Pittsburgh, Pa. (Alter, Wright & Barron, Pittsburgh, Pa., James F. McMullan, Clark, Ladner, Fortenbaugh & Young, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for ap-pellees.
Before KALODNER and SMITH, Circuit Judges, and KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
On review of the record we find no error.
The Order of the District Court will be affirmed for the reasons so well stated in the Opinion of Judge Wilson reported at 232 F.Supp. 857 (W.D.Pa.1964).