Case Name: L. E. WATERMAN CO. v. STANDARD DRUG CO. et al.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1915-05-14
Citations: 222 F. 1023
Docket Number: No. 2615
Parties: L. E. WATERMAN CO. v. STANDARD DRUG CO. et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter
Volume: 222
Pages: 1023–1023

Head Matter:
L. E. WATERMAN CO. v. STANDARD DRUG CO. et al.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
May 14, 1915.)
No. 2615.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Ohio. Suit in equity by the D. E. Waterman Company against the Standard Drug Company for the infringement of trade-mark. Decree for complainant, granting a permanent injunction. Subsequently a rule- entered against defendant and Sol Teller as its agent to show cause why attachment should not issue against them for contempt for violation of the injunction was discharged, but on appeal the order was reversed. 202 Fed. 167. On a second hearing a similar order was entered, from which complainant appeals.
Affirmed.
Walter B. Raymond, of New York City, for appellant.
T. II. Bushneil and J. A. Chamberlain, both of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellees.

Opinion:
PUR CURIAM.
This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, and was argued by counsel; and the appellant having, in our view of the present record, failed to show that appellee Teller was an officer, agent, servant, or employe' of the Standard Drug Company, or was otherwise so identified with the company as to justify the conclusion that he was under its control, at any of the times in question herein, the decree below will have to be affirmed, as it hereby is, with costs.