Case Name: Rod FIELDS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-11-15
Citations: 666 So. 2d 554
Docket Number: No. 95-485
Parties: Rod FIELDS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before BASKIN, COPE and GODERICH, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 666
Pages: 554–554

Head Matter:
Rod FIELDS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 95-485.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 15, 1995.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 7, 1996.
De la 0, Marko & Wang and Miguel M. de la 0, Miami, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Wanda Raiford, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before BASKIN, COPE and GODERICH, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
After a careful review of the record, we find that the trial court did not abuse its broad discretion regarding the admissibility of evidence. Jent v. State, 408 So.2d 1024, 1029 (Fla.1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1111, 102 S.Ct. 2916, 73 L.Ed.2d 1322 (1982). Additionally, if there was any error in the admission of this evidence, that error was harmless in light of the solid eyewitness identification of the defendant. State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).
Affirmed.