Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNDER SEAL, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-03-05
Citations: 368 F. App'x 417
Docket Number: No. 09-7889
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. UNDER SEAL, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 368
Pages: 417–418

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. UNDER SEAL, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 09-7889.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 18, 2010.
Decided: March 5, 2010.
Under Seal, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth Michel Smith, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Under Seal appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a reduction in sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Under Seal, No. 3:01-cr-00019-GCM-1 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 29, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.