Case Name: Francis LUKEFAHR, Petitioner, v. POINT EAST DEVELOPERS et al., Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1968-06-26
Citations: 212 So. 2d 4
Docket Number: No. 37337
Parties: Francis LUKEFAHR, Petitioner, v. POINT EAST DEVELOPERS et al., Respondents.
Judges: ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 212
Pages: 4–5

Head Matter:
Francis LUKEFAHR, Petitioner, v. POINT EAST DEVELOPERS et al., Respondents.
No. 37337.
Supreme Court of Florida.
June 26, 1968.
L. Barry Keyfetz, of Ser, Greenspahn, Keyfetz & Gallagher, Miami, for petitioner.
Blackwell, Walker & Gray, G. W. O’Grady, Miami, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review two orders of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing dates February 26, 1968, and April 17, 1968.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petitions, records and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petitions for certiorari and for attorneys' fees are therefore denied.
It is so ordered.
ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.