Case Name: Marion BEASLEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. D.G. WOOD, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-04-24
Citations: 274 F. App'x 284
Docket Number: No. 07-7541
Parties: Marion BEASLEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. D.G. WOOD, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 274
Pages: 284–285

Head Matter:
Marion BEASLEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. D.G. WOOD, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 07-7541.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 3, 2008.
Decided: April 24, 2008.
Marion Beasley, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Bulluck Ricci, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Marion Beasley, Jr., appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. Beasley v. Wood, No. 1:05-cv-00850-NCT (M.D.N.C. Sept. 21, 2007). Moreover, although not specifically addressed by the district court, Beasley's claim under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, Pub. L. No. 106-274, 114 Stat. 804, 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc-1 (a) (2000) ("RLUIPA"), may be dismissed for the same reasons as his § 1983 claim. See Lovelace v. Lee, 472 F.3d 174, 185-86 (4th Cir.2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.