Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Martin VICTOR, Jr., also known as Steak, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-08-07
Citations: 694 F. App'x 345
Docket Number: No. 17-30096 Summary Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Martin VICTOR, Jr., also known as Steak, Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before WIENER, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 694
Pages: 345–345

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Martin VICTOR, Jr., also known as Steak, Defendant-Appellant
No. 17-30096 Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
August 7, 2017
Camille Ann Domingue, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Martin Victor, Jr., Pro Se
Before WIENER, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Martin Victor, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Victor has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Victor's response. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivo-lous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.