Case Name: Joan Learn et al., Appellants, v. Bicentennial Wagon Train, Respondent, and Norman Deep, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Aitkin Kynette, Inc., et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents. (And Another Third-Party Action.)
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1982-06-10
Citations: 56 N.Y.2d 883
Docket Number: 
Parties: Joan Learn et al., Appellants, v Bicentennial Wagon Train, Respondent, and Norman Deep, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Aitkin Kynette, Inc., et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents. (And Another Third-Party Action.)
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 56
Pages: 883–884

Head Matter:
Joan Learn et al., Appellants, v Bicentennial Wagon Train, Respondent, and Norman Deep, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Aitkin Kynette, Inc., et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents. (And Another Third-Party Action.)
Decided June 10, 1982
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Robert M. Ginsberg for appellants.
Leonard A. Sheft and Richard T. Farrell for Norman Deep, respondent.
John T. Pellini and Stanford Kaplan for Aitkin Kynette, Inc., and another, respondents.
McCaffrey & Condon for Village of Tarrytown and another, respondents.

Opinion:
opinion of the court
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed, with costs. The Appellate Division correctly ruled that Pfaffenbach v White Plains Express Corp. (17 NY2d 132) was not applicable to the facts of this case.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtlek and Meyer. Taking no part: Judge Fuchsberg.