Case Name: The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Bernie APPLEBAUM and Howard Salus, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1974-06-04
Citations: 296 So. 2d 591
Docket Number: No. 74-212
Parties: The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Bernie APPLEBAUM and Howard Salus, Appellees.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, C. J., and HEN-DRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 296
Pages: 591–592

Head Matter:
The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Bernie APPLEBAUM and Howard Salus, Appellees.
No. 74-212.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
June 4, 1974.
Rehearing Denied July 17, 1974.
Richard E. Gerstein, State Atty., and Joseph Durant, Asst. State Atty., for appellant.
Ronald I. Strauss, Neil Chonin and Michael Tarre, Miami, for appellees.
Before BARKDULL, C. J., and HEN-DRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is an interlocutory appeal by the State, seeking to reverse an order suppressing certain conversations between the defendants in the criminal proceeding and a prosecution witness.
The conversations occurred after the State had filed an information and issued a capias, but prior to the time it had arrested the defendants or notified them of the proceedings. We reverse upon the reasoning found in Parnell v. State, Fla.App.1969, 218 So.2d 535 and in Scaldeferri v. State, Fla.App.1974, 294 So.2d 407, and hold that the trial judge erred in suppressing the conversations of February 15, 1973, and return the matter to the trial court for further proceedings.
Reversed and remanded, with directions.
. It is noted that the cited case was decided subsequent to the order of the trial court on the motion to suppress, which is the subject matter of the instant appeal.