Case Name: Wailes Dove-Hermiston Corporation, Appellant, v. Walworth Company
Court: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1930-04-18
Citations: 99 Pa. Super. 19
Docket Number: Appeal No. 11
Parties: Wailes Dove-Hermiston Corporation, Appellant, v. Walworth Company.
Judges: Before Trexler, P. J., Keller, Linn, Gawthrop, Cunningham, Baldrige and Grape, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania Superior Court Reports
Volume: 99
Pages: 19–20

Head Matter:
Wailes Dove-Hermiston Corporation, Appellant, v. Walworth Company.
Argued April 17,1930.
Before Trexler, P. J., Keller, Linn, Gawthrop, Cunningham, Baldrige and Grape, JJ.
Edward G. Bothwell, of Morris, Walker, Bothwell & Harrison, for appellant.
Frederick Shoemaker, and with him William F. Knoell, of Shoemaker & Knoell, for appellee.
April 18, 1930:

Opinion:
Per Curiam,
This appeal is from an order refusing judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. After reading the pleadings, and considering argument of counsel, we cannot say it is "clear and free from doubt" that the court below erred in refusing judgment; following the usual course pursued in such cases, we shall not disturb the orders appealed from; nor shall we discuss the applicable rules of law, till an opportunity is had fully to develop the facts at trial: Philadelphia v. Merchant & Evans Co., 289 Pa. 578; Hulton v. Union Ice & C. S. Co., 291 Pa. 447; Jaffe v. Lipsky Bros., 291 Pa. 470, and Real Estate-Land Title & Tr. Co., Executor, v. Fidelity Mutual L. I. Co., 2'95 Pa. 90.
The order appealed from is affirmed.