Case Name: The State of Ohio, Appellant, v. Gray, Appellee
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1998-12-30
Citations: 84 Ohio St. 3d 214
Docket Number: No. 98-2159
Parties: The State of Ohio, Appellant, v. Gray, Appellee.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Douglas, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 84
Pages: 214–215

Head Matter:
The State of Ohio, Appellant, v. Gray, Appellee.
[Cite as State v. Gray (1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 214.]
(No. 98-2159
Submitted November 10, 1998
Decided December 30, 1998.)
Mark E. Mulligan, Ottawa County Prosecuting Attorney, and Paul Skaff, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.

Opinion:
The certification of conflict by the Court of Appeals for Ottawa County is accepted.
The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Cook (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570.
The trial court's finding that Daniel Gray is a sexual predator is reinstated.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Resnick, J., not participating.