Case Name: ENI Technology Inc., Plaintiff, v. United States, Defendant
Court: United States Court of International Trade
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009
Citations: 33 Ct. Int'l Trade 1775
Docket Number: Consolidated Court No. 05-00170
Parties: ENI Technology Inc., Plaintiff, v. United States, Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Court of International Trade Reports
Volume: 33
Pages: 1775–1776

Head Matter:
662 F.Supp.2d 1359
ENI Technology Inc., Plaintiff, v. United States, Defendant.
Consolidated Court No. 05-00170

Opinion:
JUDGMENT
POGUE, Judge:
Upon reading the parties moving papers for summary judgment and other papers in this proceeding, and upon due deliberation, it is hereby
ORDERED that defendant's classification of the subject RF generators is overruled and defendant's cross-motion for summary judgment is denied in its entirety,
ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is granted as to plaintiff's claim that the "principal use" of the subject RF generators is for plasma processing of semiconductors,
ORDERED that plaintiff's for summary judgment is denied as to plaintiff's claim that all of the subject RF generators are classifiable in subheading 8479.89.84, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States ("HTSUS") (2002-2004).
ORDERED that each of the subject RF generators are classifiable in the HTSUS according to the method or methods of plasma processing in which they were programmed to perform as follows: Models ACG-GB-02 and GHW25A13DF3N01 in subheading 8466.93.85 which relates to etch processing, Model GHW12Z13DF2N01 in subheading 8543.90.10 which relates to physical vapor deposition processing, and Models B-10013-00 and ACG-6B-01 in subheading 8479.89.84 which relates to chemical vapor deposition processing and/or undetermined or multiple processing methods, and
ORDERED that U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall reliqui-date the subject entries and refund, with lawful interest, all duties paid on the subject RF generators.