Case Name: J. F. Farley, Receiver of The Mid-West Mutual Insurance Company, Appellant, v. N. R. Adriance et al., Appellees; J. F. Farley, Receiver of The Mid-West Mutual Insurance Company, Appellant, v. George T. Adkison et al., Appellees
Court: Kansas Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Kansas
Decision Date: 1927-12-10
Citations: 124 Kan. 598
Docket Number: No. 27,612; No. 27,632
Parties: J. F. Farley, Receiver of The Mid-West Mutual Insurance Company, Appellant, v. N. R. Adriance et al., Appellees. J. F. Farley, Receiver of The Mid-West Mutual Insurance Company, Appellant, v. George T. Adkison et al., Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Kansas Reports
Volume: 124
Pages: 598–598

Head Matter:
No. 27,612.
J. F. Farley, Receiver of The Mid-West Mutual Insurance Company, Appellant, v. N. R. Adriance et al., Appellees. J. F. Farley, Receiver of The Mid-West Mutual Insurance Company, Appellant, v. George T. Adkison et al., Appellees.
No. 27,632.
(261 Pac. 1116.)
Opinion filed December 10, 1927.
Richard E. Bird, of Wichita, for the appellant.
G. R. Gard, of Iola, A. E. Morgan, J. Sidney Nye, both of Newton, Al F. Williams, Don H'. Elleman, both of Columbus, C..L. Aikman, Walter F. Mc-Ginis, Jr., both of El Dorado, Guy L. Hursh, of Topeka, Lee Bond, C. F. W. Dossier, both of Leavenworth, A. C. Malloy, R. C. Davis, W. H. White, all of Hutchinson, David Ritchie, of Salina, C. J. Conlon, of Atchison, E. L. Foulke, R. R. Vermilion, C. A..Matson, W. D. Jochems, P. D. Gardiner, Graham Campbell, Earl Blake, Arch F. Williams, George Siefkin, ail of Wichita, L. D. Moore and Harold W. Herrick, both of Winfield, for the appellees.

Opinion:
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hopkins, J.:
The action was one by the receiver of The Mid-West Mutual Insurance Company against some three thousand of its policyholders, residing in many counties of the state, to recover from each a sum equal to one annual premium on his policy. The questions presented are similar to those considered in Hall v. Hall, 124 Kan. 466, 260 Pac. 645. The decision in that case is controlling here.
The judgment is affirmed.