Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lesa R. FULLER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-11-17
Citations: 300 F. App'x 250
Docket Number: No. 08-4465
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Lesa R. FULLER, Defendant— Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 300
Pages: 250–250

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Lesa R. FULLER, Defendant— Appellant.
No. 08-4465.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 23, 2008.
Decided: Nov. 17, 2008.
Troy N. Giatras, The Giatras Law Firm, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. Charles T. Miller, United States Attorney, Susan M. Robinson, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Lesa R. Fuller pled guilty to embezzlement under 18 U.S.C. § 656 (2006) and was sentenced to twenty-one months of imprisonment. On appeal, Fuller alleges that the district court erred by enhancing her sentence by two levels for abusing a position of trust under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual ("USSG") § 3B1.3 (2007). For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
We find no clear error in the district court's decision to impose the enhancement. United States v. Gordon, 61 F.3d 263, 269 (4th Cir.1995) (providing standard). The record reveals that Fuller's position of being a "personal banker" clearly aided her crime and provided her with authority beyond "an ordinary bank teller." USSG § 3B1.3, comment, (n.l). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.