Case Name: Leonard E. WIMMER, D.O., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. DEACONESS HEALTH SYSTEM, d/b/a Deaconess Hospital-West Campus, a corporation, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1996-03-05
Citations: 917 S.W.2d 625
Docket Number: No. 68634
Parties: Leonard E. WIMMER, D.O., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. DEACONESS HEALTH SYSTEM, d/b/a Deaconess Hospital-West Campus, a corporation, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before SMITH, P.J., and GARY GAERTNER and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 917
Pages: 625–626

Head Matter:
Leonard E. WIMMER, D.O., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. DEACONESS HEALTH SYSTEM, d/b/a Deaconess Hospital-West Campus, a corporation, Defendant/Respondent.
No. 68634.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
March 5, 1996.
William K. Holland, St. Louis, for appellant.
Teresa Dale Pupillo, Roger K. Heiden-reich, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before SMITH, P.J., and GARY GAERTNER and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Leonard E. Wimmer, appeals from the trial court's entry of summary judgment in favor of respondent, Deaconess Health System, d/b/a Deaconess Hospital— West Campus, on appellant's claim for damages arising from respondent's alleged breach of contract. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence, and no error of law appears. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the circuit court's order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum solely for the use of the parties here involved has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.