Case Name: Rose GIORDANO, Appellant, v. Mario GIORDANO, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1961-02-06
Citations: 126 So. 2d 602
Docket Number: No. 59-720
Parties: Rose GIORDANO, Appellant, v. Mario GIORDANO, Appellee.
Judges: HORTON, C. J., and PEARSON and CARROLL, CHAS., JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 126
Pages: 602–603

Head Matter:
Rose GIORDANO, Appellant, v. Mario GIORDANO, Appellee.
No. 59-720.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District
Feb. 6, 1961.
Murray Z. Klein and Julius H. Erstling, Miami, for appellant.
Rothenberg, Burris & Englander, Miami Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The plaintiff, husband, was granted a decree of divorce and the defendant and counterclaimant, wife, appealed. Each party charged the other with desertion. Because of the involved factual background which covered the actions of the parties during a thirty-year period, the case presents some difficulty. However, upon review, the ultimate question is whether there was sufficient evidence to sustain the decree and we conclude that the evidence viewed in its most favorable light can be so construed. E.g., Schuberth v. Schuberth, Fla.1951, 52 So.2d 332; Monsalvatge v. Monsalvatge, 153 Fla. 763, 15 So.2d 838.
Affirmed.
HORTON, C. J., and PEARSON and CARROLL, CHAS., JJ., concur.