Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. David James, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1999-11-01
Citations: 266 A.D.2d 236
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David James, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 266
Pages: 236–236

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David James, Appellant.
[699 NYS2d 418]

Opinion:
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Berry, J.), rendered July 29, 1997, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant was found in his motel room with a packet of $20 bills on his person and a few feet away from two partially-open tissue papers containing 28 tinfoil packages of cocaine. Also present in the room were loose pieces of aluminum foil, a razor with cocaine residue on it, and a second packet of $20 bills.
The trial court was correct in charging the presumption of knowing possession pursuant to Penal Law § 220.25 (2), as the defendant was in close proximity to the cocaine and there was sufficient evidence to establish that the substance was being prepared for packaging (see, People v Frazier, 138 AD2d 401; People v Staley, 123 AD2d 407; People v McCall, 137 AD2d 561). Applying this presumption of possession, which was not rebutted, the evidence was legally sufficient to support the defendant's conviction.
The trial court properly allowed expert testimony regarding the packaging of cocaine, since this subject is not within the knowledge of the average juror (see, People v Vaughan, 187 AD2d 685; People v Gallego, 155 AD2d 687).
The defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, without merit. Thompson, J. P., Joy, McGinity and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.