Case Name: William Joe RIFE, Petitioner-Appellee, v. R.G. "Dick" GODBEHERE, Sheriff, Maricopa County; and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona, and The Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Respondents-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1987-07-27
Citations: 825 F.2d 185
Docket Number: No. 86-2146
Parties: William Joe RIFE, Petitioner-Appellee, v. R.G. “Dick” GODBEHERE, Sheriff, Maricopa County; and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona, and The Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Respondents-Appellants.
Judges: Before CHOY, PREGERSON and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 825
Pages: 185–185

Head Matter:
William Joe RIFE, Petitioner-Appellee, v. R.G. “Dick” GODBEHERE, Sheriff, Maricopa County; and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona, and The Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Respondents-Appellants.
No. 86-2146.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
July 27, 1987.
Richard D. Coffinger, Glendale, Ariz., for petitioner-appellee.
Louis Frank Dominguez, Phoenix, Ariz., for respondents-appellants.
Before CHOY, PREGERSON and CANBY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
The opinion in the above case filed on April 7, 1987, is hereby amended as follows:
On page 5 of the slip opinion, 3 lines from the bottom of the page, [814 F.2d at 565 col. 1, 5 lines up from bottom] following the sentence which ends with the phrase "did not pose a 'serious risk' to the union." add the following footnote:
In 1984 Congress amended 18 U.S.C. § 1(3), increasing the maximum fine for a federal petty offense committed by an individual from $500 to $5,000. Criminal Fine Enforcement Act of 1984, Pub.L. No. 98-596, § 8, 98 Stat. 3134, 3138 (1984).
The 1984 amendments are to apply to offenses committed after December 31, 1984. Criminal Fine Enforcement Act of 1984, Pub.L. No. 98-596, § 10, 98 Stat. 3134, 3138 (1984). Because Rife was charged with crimes committed between the dates of June 2, 1983 and December 2, 1983, the 1984 amendments are not relevant to the outcome of this case.