Case Name: David WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. COLOR ART OFFICE INTERIORS, INC., and Division of Employment Security, Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2009-12-15
Citations: 299 S.W.3d 335
Docket Number: No. ED 93173
Parties: David WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. COLOR ART OFFICE INTERIORS, INC., and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 299
Pages: 335–335

Head Matter:
David WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. COLOR ART OFFICE INTERIORS, INC., and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.
No. ED 93173.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Dec. 15, 2009.
Susan L. Thurmer, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Rachel M. Lewis, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
David Washington appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying his unemployment benefits. We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal, and we conclude that the Commission's decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record, and no error of law appears.
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).