Case Name: Howard D. ABRAMOWITZ, Appellant, v. Wilber M. BRUCKER, Secretary of the Department of the Army, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1957-04-26
Citations: 243 F.2d 834
Docket Number: No. 13587
Parties: Howard D. ABRAMOWITZ, Appellant, v. Wilber M. BRUCKER, Secretary of the Department of the Army, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 243
Pages: 834–834

Head Matter:
Howard D. ABRAMOWITZ, Appellant, v. Wilber M. BRUCKER, Secretary of the Department of the Army, Appellee.
No. 13587.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued April 11, 1957.
Decided April 26, 1957.
W-it of Certiorari Granted June 17, 1957.
See 77 S.Ct. 1383.
Mr. Victor Rabinowitz, New York City, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court with whom Mr. David Rein, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellant.
Asst. Atty. Gen. George C. Doub, Messrs. Oliver Gasch, U. S. Atty., Paul A. Sweeney, Donald B. MacGuineas and Howard E. Shapiro, Attys., Dept, of Justice, submitted on the brief for appellee.
Before BAZELON, FAHY and DANAHER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We are agreed that Harmon v. Brucker, 1957, 100 U.S.App.D.C. -, 243 F.2d 613, is controlling here. If the question were open, Judge Bazelon would reverse for the reasons stated in his dissent in Harmon and Judge Fahy would wish to consider the question anew.
Affirmed.