Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos L. CARPENTER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-07-06
Citations: 137 F. App'x 909
Docket Number: No. 04-2270
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos L. CARPENTER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before CUDAHY, EASTERBROOK, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 137
Pages: 909–910

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos L. CARPENTER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 04-2270.
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
July 6, 2005.
K. Tate Chambers, Office of the United States Attorney, Peoria, IL, for PlaintiffAppellee.
Carlos L. Carpenter, Terre Haute, IN, Pro se.
Joseph M. Borsberry, Reynolds, Murphy & Associates, Peoria, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before CUDAHY, EASTERBROOK, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Order
Our decision of May 6, 2005, affirmed Carpenter's conviction while reserving final disposition of the sentence. On a limited remand under United States v. Paladino, 401 F.3d 471 (7th Cir.2005), the district judge stated that he would have imposed a lower sentence had he realized that he possesses additional discretion.. Both sides have filed memoranda asking us to remand for resentencing. Accordingly, as the parties have agreed, the sentence is vacated and the case is remanded for re-sentencing.