Case Name: John S. HAGER, Jr., and Francis Hager, his wife, Appellants, v. Fred WALDRON and Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, a corporation, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1972-12-15
Citations: 270 So. 2d 395
Docket Number: No. 71-1100
Parties: John S. HAGER, Jr., and Francis Hager, his wife, Appellants, v. Fred WALDRON and Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, a corporation, Appellees.
Judges: CROSS and MAGER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 270
Pages: 395–395

Head Matter:
John S. HAGER, Jr., and Francis Hager, his wife, Appellants, v. Fred WALDRON and Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, a corporation, Appellees.
No. 71-1100.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Dec. 15, 1972.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 10, 1973,
Timothy P. Poulton of Deschler, Reed, Mowry & Poulton, Boca Raton, for appellants.
Steven R. Berger of Carey, Dwyer, Austin, Cole & Selwood, P. A., Miami, for ap-pellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellants-plaintiffs, John S. Hager and Francis Hager, appeal a summary final judgment entered in favor of appellees-defendants, Fred Waldron and Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, in an action for damages arising out of an automobile-horse collision. We have reviewed the record in the light of the points raised on appeal, and reverse.
We do so because we find that a genuine issue as to a material fact exists as to whether the appellee-defendant, Fred Wal-dron, agreed to board the horse, and as to whether the appellee-defendant, Fred Waldron, was negligent in maintaining and operating the pasture. Such circumstance bars use of the summary judgment procedure. Holl v. Talcott, Fla.1966, 191 So.2d 40; Hartnett v. Fowler, Fla.1957, 94 So.2d 724; Enes v. Baker, Fla.1952, 58 So.2d 551.
Reversed and remanded.
CROSS and MAGER, JJ., concur.
WALDEN, J., dissents, without opinion.