Case Name: FREDERICK HINDERER, vs. MR. & MRS. F. E. HAINES
Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1908-02-10
Citations: 5 Teiss. 193
Docket Number: No. 4351 and 4426
Parties: FREDERICK HINDERER, vs. MR. & MRS. F. E. HAINES.
Judges: 
Reporter: Decisions, Court of Appeal, parish of Orleans (Teissier)
Volume: 5
Pages: 193–195

Head Matter:
No. 4351 and 4426.
(Court of Appeal, Parish of Orleans.)
FREDERICK HINDERER, vs. MR. & MRS. F. E. HAINES.
1. As a general r.ule no injury can 'be considered irreparable when the damage or loss occasioned by the act complained of can be made good or repaired by the payment of money.
2. Where an interlocutory judgment does not cause an irreparable injury no appeal lies therefrom.
]. A motion-to dissolve a writ of provisional seizure on the .ground that the lease and rent notes sued on were not signed by de fendant cannot be viewed as a dilatory exception or as a peremptory exception relative to form.
Appeal from Civil District Court, Division “C.”
Rehearing refused, February 10, 1908.
Merrick & Lewis & P. Gensler & R. J. Schwartz, Plaintiff and Appellee.
A. J. Rossi, Theo. Cotonio, Defendant and Appellant.

Opinion:
MOORE, J.
This is an appeal from an order of Court directing the sale of certain property provisionally seized, the sale having been ordered in accordance with Act No. 94 of 1900, and • at the request of plaintiff, on the ground that the property provisionally seized was of a perishable nature and subject to be lost or deterioated in value pending the suit.
The motion to dismiss is based on the ground that the -interlocutory order works no irreparable injury.
The motion must prevail.
If the defendant, who is the appellant here, should be successful in the suit and the writ of provisional seizure should be dissolved, the injury which he may sustain by the sale of his property thus provoked, would be compensable in money hence the injury would not be irreparable. It is well settled that as, a general rule, no injury can be considered irreparable where the damage or loss occasioned by the act complained of can be made good or repaired by the payment of money. State ex rel, Certing vs. Judge 104 La. 79; Schwan et al., vs. Schwan 52 A. 1193. The appeal is dismissed.