Case Name: In the Matter of the Application of E. R. BALL for a Writ of Habeas Corpus
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1932-11-10
Citations: 127 Cal. App. 433
Docket Number: Crim. No. 2246
Parties: In the Matter of the Application of E. R. BALL for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports
Volume: 127
Pages: 433–434

Head Matter:
[Crim. No. 2246.
Second Appellate District, Division Two.
November 10, 1932.]
In the Matter of the Application of E. R. BALL for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.
Leland S. Bower for Petitioner.
Arthur T. George, Ira H. Rowell and Roderick B. Cassidy for Respondent.

Opinion:
THOMPSON (IRA F.), J.
The petitioner was adjudged by the Railroad Commission of the State of California to be guilty of contempt for failure to obey an order of that body rendered April 27, 1931, requiring him to desist from engaging in the freight transportation business as a common carrier thereof. It is alleged in the petition that petitioner was not engaged in that business as a common carrier but only as a private carrier. However, it was found by the Commission that the petitioner has 1 ' continued to operate and conduct the business of operating automobile trucks for the transportation of property as a common carrier, for compensation, over the public highways of this state, and specifically between Los Angeles and contiguous territory, on the one hand, and certain oil fields in the San Joaquin valley, on the other hand between September 15 and December 31, 1931, inclusive, and subsequent thereto." It is to be noted in this connection that the Supreme Court of California denied the petition of E. R. Ball for the writ of certiorari to review the action of the Commission in punishing him for this contempt. (See minutes of Supreme Court for July 25, 1932, vol. 84 Cal. Dec., Book No. 4401, Case No. L. A. 13782, 127 Cal. App. 433 [15 Pac. (2d) 862].) Hence it is apparent that the decision has become final and the law of the case has been established. Since petitioner's entire argument is built upon the assumed foundation that he was operating as a private carrier, nothing further remains to be said.
Writ discharged. Petitioner remanded tó the custody of the sheriff of Los Angeles County. .
Works, P. J., and Stephens, J., pro tem., concurred.