Case Name: In the Matter of Long Island Lighting Company, Respondent, v. Assessor of the Town of Brookhaven et al., Appellants. Shoreham Wading River Central School District, Intervenor-Appellant. (Proceeding No. 1.); In the Matter of Long Island Lighting Company, Respondent, v. Assessor of the Town of Brookhaven et al., Appellants. Shoreham Wading River Central School District, Intervenor-Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.)
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1988-05-16
Citations: 140 A.D.2d 523
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Long Island Lighting Company, Respondent, v Assessor of the Town of Brookhaven et al., Appellants. Shoreham Wading River Central School District, Intervenor-Appellant. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Long Island Lighting Company, Respondent, v Assessor of the Town of Brookhaven et al., Appellants. Shoreham Wading River Central School District, Intervenor-Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.)
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 140
Pages: 523–523

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Long Island Lighting Company, Respondent, v Assessor of the Town of Brookhaven et al., Appellants. Shoreham Wading River Central School District, Intervenor-Appellant. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Long Island Lighting Company, Respondent, v Assessor of the Town of Brookhaven et al., Appellants. Shoreham Wading River Central School District, Intervenor-Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.)

Opinion:
We find that the Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in denying the motion for a stay of the instant proceedings. Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Brown and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.