Case Name: ZANE DEVELOPMENT SYND. v. KURTZ and DORMEYER
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1923-09-20
Citations: 1 Ohio Law Abs. 735
Docket Number: No. 1083
Parties: ZANE DEVELOPMENT SYND. v. KURTZ and DORMEYER
Judges: 
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 1
Pages: 735–735

Head Matter:
No. 756
ZANE DEVELOPMENT SYND. v. KURTZ and DORMEYER
Ohio Appeals, 2nd District, Franklin County
No. 1083.
Decided Sept. 20, 1923
This opinion has not been published except in Abstract..
PRACTICE.
Court Rules — Case will not be dismissed in alE instances, where counsel failed to file brief in accordance with court rule.
Attorneys-Vorys, Seymour & Pease, for Zane Development Syndicate; Turner, Calland & Summers, for Kurtz and Dormeyer.

Opinion:
BY THE .COURT.
Epitomized Opinion
This was a hearing on a motion to dismiss a petition in error filed in the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, Ohio. Under Court Rule No. 8, plaintiff-in-error was required to file a brief in the Court of Appeals within a certain length of time. Upon failure of counsel to do this, a motion was filed by tho defendant-in-error to dismiss the case. In overruling the motion, the Court of Appeals held:
1. In view of the importance of this case, the voluminous record and the situation of counsel, the delay of, the brief of counsel for plaintiff-in-error was not so great as to warrant the court in dismissing the ease under Rule No. 8.