Case Name: Stamatis SOUYOUTZIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M/V GEORGIOS K, her engines, tackle, apparel, etc., et al., Defendants, United States Marshal, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1976-01-16
Citations: 525 F.2d 1197
Docket Number: No. 75-1924
Parties: Stamatis SOUYOUTZIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M/V GEORGIOS K, her engines, tackle, apparel, etc., et al., Defendants, United States Marshal, Appellee.
Judges: Before GODBOLD, DYER and MORGAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 525
Pages: 1197–1197

Head Matter:
Stamatis SOUYOUTZIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M/V GEORGIOS K, her engines, tackle, apparel, etc., et al., Defendants, United States Marshal, Appellee.
No. 75-1924.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Jan. 16, 1976.
Hillord H. Hinson, Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appellant.
Edward B. McDonough, Jr., U. S. Atty., Jack Shepherd, Asst. U. S. Atty., Houston, Tex., Morton Hollander, Mark Mutterperl, Leonard Schaitmann, Appellate Section, Civ. Div., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Before GODBOLD, DYER and MORGAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Without prepayment of costs pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 1916, Souyoutzis filed a suit in rem for wages against the M/V Georgios K. Relying on 28 U.S.C.A. § 1921, the Marshal refused to execute the warrant of attachment without a deposit for costs to be incurred. The district court denied relief. We affirm for the reasons explicated in Araya v. McLelland, 5 Cir. 1976, 525 F.2d 1194.
Affirmed.