Case Name: Kimberly YOUNG, Appellant, v. DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2014-07-29
Citations: 444 S.W.3d 491
Docket Number: Nos. WD 76691, WD 76692, WD 76693
Parties: Kimberly YOUNG, Appellant, v. DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Respondent.
Judges: Before Division Two: VICTOR C. HOWARD, Presiding Judge, JAMES E. WELSH, Judge and ANTHONY REX GABBERT, Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 444
Pages: 491–492

Head Matter:
Kimberly YOUNG, Appellant, v. DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Respondent.
Nos. WD 76691, WD 76692, WD 76693.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
July 29, 2014.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Sept. 2, 2014.
Application for Transfer Denied Oct. 28, 2014.
Kimberly Young, Appellant Pro-se.
Sara H. Harrison, for Respondent.
Before Division Two: VICTOR C. HOWARD, Presiding Judge, JAMES E. WELSH, Judge and ANTHONY REX GABBERT, Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Kimberly Young appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission ("Commission") affirming the Division of Employment Security Appeals Tribunal's ("Appeals Tribunal") decision to deny her unemployment benefits. In her sole point on appeal, Ms. Young claims that the Commission erred in affirming the decision of the Appeals Tribunal because her claim "was a EUC08 and not a regular UI claim[,]" and "[t]he Tribunal did not give a pamphlet concerning this hearing!,] . [t]he Agency failed to give a written notice [that] the appellant could fully understand!,] . gave no appeals information in its determination!, and] . failed to give a notice every week for the ineligibility!.]" Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).