Case Name: TYMBER SKAN ON THE LAKE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Charles E. PETERMAN and Carol A. Peterman, his wife, Jerald R. Coomes and Connie Coomes, his wife, and Charles E. Bender, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-01-17
Citations: 591 So. 2d 681
Docket Number: No. 91-1111
Parties: TYMBER SKAN ON THE LAKE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Charles E. PETERMAN and Carol A. Peterman, his wife, Jerald R. Coomes and Connie Coomes, his wife, and Charles E. Bender, Appellees.
Judges: COBB, COWART and GRIFFIN, JJ„ concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 591
Pages: 681–681

Head Matter:
TYMBER SKAN ON THE LAKE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Charles E. PETERMAN and Carol A. Peterman, his wife, Jerald R. Coomes and Connie Coomes, his wife, and Charles E. Bender, Appellees.
No. 91-1111.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Jan. 17, 1992.
Robert 0. Marks and Bruce E. Chapin of O’Neill, Chapin, Marks, Liebman, Popper & Cooper, Orlando, for appellant.
John A. Leklem of Sparks, Cooper & Leklem, P.A., Orlando, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We find no error in the instant appeal except for the failure of the trial court to make specific findings of fact regarding the assessment of a reasonable attorney's fee for the original defendants below (Peterman, et al.) as required by Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1985). In otherwise affirming the instant appeal, we do not imply any individual liability of unit owners in the Tymber Skan on the Lake Homeowners Association for any judgment entered below against the Association, and counsel for the appellees at oral argument conceded that such would not be the case.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED.
COBB, COWART and GRIFFIN, JJ" concur.