Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Randolph CLARK, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1996-08-13
Citations: 926 S.W.2d 725
Docket Number: No. 67836
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Randolph CLARK, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 926
Pages: 725–725

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Randolph CLARK, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 67836.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District. Division One.
Aug. 13, 1996.
Brian E. Zink, St. Charles, for appellant.
Matt Thornhill, Dennis R. Chassaniol, II, Asst. Pros. Attys., St. Charles County, St. Charles, for respondent.
Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals from the judgments entered pursuant to jury convictions for driving while intoxicated, § 577.010, RSMo 1986, and failure to drive within a single lane, § 304.015, RSMo 1986. He was sentenced in accordance with the jury recommendation to seven days' imprisonment for the driving while intoxicated conviction and received a monetary fine for the single lane conviction. We affirm. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).