Case Name: HUMANA MEDICAL PLAN, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WESTERN HERITAGE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-01-25
Citations: 880 F.3d 1284
Docket Number: No. 15-11436
Parties: HUMANA MEDICAL PLAN, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WESTERN HERITAGE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, HULL , MARCUS, WILSON, WILLIAM PRYOR, MARTIN, JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, JILL PRYOR, and NEWSOM, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 880
Pages: 1284–1300

Head Matter:
HUMANA MEDICAL PLAN, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WESTERN HERITAGE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-11436
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
01/25/2018
Michael P. Abate, Dinsmore & Shohl, LLP, LOUISVILLE, KY, Jeffrey T. Kuntz, Daniel Alter, GrayRobinson, PA, FORT LAUDERDALE, FL, Eileen Kuo, Thomas H. Lawrence, Russell & Oliver, PLC, MEMPHIS, TN, Caroline L. Schiff, Humana, Inc., CHICAGO, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee. ‘
Anthony John Russo, Lewis F..Collins, Jr., William Philip Schoel, Butler Weih-muller Katz Craig, LLP, TAMPA, FL, Neil H. Selman, Selman Breitman, LOS ANGELES, CA, Jennifer J. Capabianco, Selman Breitman, LLP, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
David Joseph Farber, King & Spalding, LLP, WASHINGTON, DC, Amicus Curiae for THE MARC COALITION, THE PROPERTY CASUALTY INSURERS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA.
Ryan Lee Woody, Matthiesen Wickert & Lehrer, SC, HARTFORD, WI, John David Kolb, Gibson Kolb, PLC, LOUISVILLE, KY, Amicus Curiae for THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SUBROGATION PROFESSIONALS, AMERICA’S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS,
Frank Carlos Quesada, MSP Law Firm, MIAMI, FL, Amicus Curiae for MSP RECOVERY, LLC.
Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, HULL , MARCUS, WILSON, WILLIAM PRYOR, MARTIN, JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, JILL PRYOR, and NEWSOM, Circuit Judges.
Judge Frank Hull participated in the en banc poll that was conducted in this case before taking senior status on December 31, 2017.
Judge Julie Carnes recused herself and did not participate in the en banc poll.

Opinion:
BY THE COURT:
A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges in active service on this Court having voted against granting a rehearing en banc, it is ORDERED that this case will not be reheard en banc.