Case Name: SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. PINECREST LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Florida Limited Partnership; d/b/a Pinecrest Convalescent Home and Barton D. Weisman, a general partner, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1999-09-13
Citations: 739 So. 2d 733
Docket Number: No. 99-1018
Parties: SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. PINECREST LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Florida Limited Partnership; d/b/a Pinecrest Convalescent Home and Barton D. Weisman, a general partner, Appellees.
Judges: Before NESBITT, SHEVIN and SORONDO, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 739
Pages: 733–734

Head Matter:
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. PINECREST LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Florida Limited Partnership; d/b/a Pinecrest Convalescent Home and Barton D. Weisman, a general partner, Appellees.
No. 99-1018.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Sept. 13, 1999.
Wiederhold, Moses, Bulfin & Rubin and Robert D. Moses, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
McGrane & Nosich and Rhea P. Gross-man, Coral Gables, for appellees.
Before NESBITT, SHEVIN and SORONDO, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the final summary judgment as the trial court properly enforced the insurance policy in accordance with its plain language and entered judgment concerning the attorney's fee issue in favor of appellees. See Wilson v. Wasser, 562 So.2d 339 (Fla.1990); Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Bouchoc, 514 So.2d 52 (Fla.1987); Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. Lamm, 218 So.2d 219 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 225 So.2d 529 (Fla.1969).
Affirmed.