Case Name: HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COASTAL FAIRFIELD COUNTY, INC. v. Kim LANHAM et al.
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 2016-06-21
Citations: 141 A.3d 937
Docket Number: No. 37940.
Parties: HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COASTAL FAIRFIELD COUNTY, INC.
v.
Kim LANHAM et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 141
Pages: 937–938

Head Matter:
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COASTAL FAIRFIELD COUNTY, INC.
v.
Kim LANHAM et al.
No. 37940.
Appellate Court of Connecticut.
Argued March 2, 2016.
Decided June 21, 2016.
Kim Lanham, self-represented, the appellant (named defendant).
Barbara M. Schellenberg, Bridgeport, with whom, on the brief, was Vincent M. Marino, Middletown, for the appellee (plaintiff).
ALVORD, PRESCOTT and MULLINS, Js.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The defendant Kim Lanham appeals from the judgment of strict foreclosure, rendered by the trial court, in favor of the plaintiff, Habitat for Humanity of Coastal Fairfield County, Inc. After reviewing and considering the record in this case, including the briefs and arguments of the parties on appeal, we conclude that the court properly rendered a judgment of strict foreclosure. There is no error.
The judgment is affirmed and the case is remanded to the trial court for the purpose of setting new law days.