Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Tong Thanh Robert NGUYEN, also known as Robert Nguyen, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-10-10
Citations: 144 F. App'x 576
Docket Number: No. 04-4113
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Tong Thanh Robert NGUYEN, also known as Robert Nguyen, Appellant.
Judges: Before ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 144
Pages: 576–577

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Tong Thanh Robert NGUYEN, also known as Robert Nguyen, Appellant.
No. 04-4113.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 4, 2005.
Decided: Oct. 10, 2005.
Janice Marie Lipovsky, Sara Elizabeth Fullerton, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Lincoln, NE, for Appellee.
Dana M. London, Lincoln, NE, for Appellant.
Tong Thanh Robert Nguyen, Lincoln, NE, pro se.
Before ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Tong Thanh Robert Nguyen pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute and possess with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, and the district court sentenced him to 135 months in prison and 5 years of supervised release. On appeal, Nguyen argues the district court should have departed downward under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3 because the seriousness of his criminal history was overstated, and he should be resentenced under United States v. Booker, — U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), because the district court treated the Guidelines as mandatory at his pre-Booker sentencing.
As to the first issue, Nguyen cannot challenge his 135-month prison sentence because he specifically agreed to it in his plea agreement. See United States v. Reyes-Contreras, 349 F.3d 524, 525 (8th Cir.2003) (per curiam); United States v. Nguyen, 46 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir.1995). As to the second issue, Nguyen did not raise a Sixth Amendment objection below, and he cannot demonstrate a reasonable probability the district court would have imposed a lower sentence under advisory Guidelines. See United States v. Pirani, 406 F.3d 543, 552-53 (8th Cir.2005) (en banc), petition for cert. filed, — U.S.L.W. - (U.S. July 27, 2005) (No. 05-5547).
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.