Case Name: William David HAHN, Appellant, v. Erica HAHN, Brooke Hahn, Alan Weinstein, as Trustee, Wayne Kaplan, and Wayne Kaplan, P.A., Appellees.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2019-04-10
Citations: 270 So. 3d 410
Docket Number: No. 4D17-3919
Parties: William David HAHN, Appellant,
v.
Erica HAHN, Brooke Hahn, Alan Weinstein, as Trustee, Wayne Kaplan, and Wayne Kaplan, P.A., Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 270
Pages: 410–410

Head Matter:
William David HAHN, Appellant,
v.
Erica HAHN, Brooke Hahn, Alan Weinstein, as Trustee, Wayne Kaplan, and Wayne Kaplan, P.A., Appellees.
No. 4D17-3919
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
[April 10, 2019]
Meah Rothman Tell of Meah Rothman Tell, P.A., Lauderhill, for appellant.
John P. Seiler and Steven A. Wahlbrink of the Law Offices of Seiler, Sautter, Zaden, Rimes & Wahlbrink, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees Erica Hahn and Brooke Hahn.
Wayne Kaplan of Wayne Kaplan, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellees Wayne Kaplan and Wayne Kaplan, P.A.

Opinion:
Weiss, Daliah H., Associate Judge.
Appellant raises multiple points on appeal. Points one, two, and five, as numbered in appellant's brief, pertain to Erica and Brooke Hahn. Points three, four, six, and seven address Wayne Kaplan and Wayne Kaplan, P.A. On all issues involving the Hahns, we affirm without discussion. On the remaining issues concerning Wayne Kaplan and Wayne Kaplan, P.A., we dismiss the appeal due to the pendency of a counterclaim in the lower court. See Mendez v. W. Flagler Family Ass'n , 303 So.2d 1, 5 (Fla. 1974).
Affirmed in part; dismissed in part .
Warner and Gross, JJ., concur.