Case Name: Kenneth A. CRUM, Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-10-19
Citations: 146 S.W.3d 455
Docket Number: No. WD 63815
Parties: Kenneth A. CRUM, Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Respondent.
Judges: Before THOMAS H. NEWTON, Presiding Judge, HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, Judge, and RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 146
Pages: 455–456

Head Matter:
Kenneth A. CRUM, Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Respondent.
No. WD 63815.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Oct. 19, 2004.
Richard Brent Hankins, Kansas City, for Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, William Ryan Kennedy, Office of Attorney General, Jefferson City, for Respondent.
Before THOMAS H. NEWTON, Presiding Judge, HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, Judge, and RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
Kenneth Crum appeals from the judgment sustaining the Director of Revenue's administrative sanction of his driver's license pursuant to section 302.535 (2001), RSMo. He raises two points. First, he argues that the arresting officer lacked probable cause to believe that Crum was driving his vehicle in an intoxicated condition. Secondly, he contends that the trial court ignored "alcohol curve" expert testimony that Crum's alcohol level at the time of arrest could have been below .08.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no prec-edential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).