Case Name: WILFRED TANTUM, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CHARLES D. BINZ, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1982-10-18
Citations: 91 N.J. 426
Docket Number: 
Parties: WILFRED TANTUM, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CHARLES D. BINZ, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 91
Pages: 426–426

Head Matter:
WILFRED TANTUM, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CHARLES D. BINZ, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Argued September 28, 1982
Decided October 18, 1982.
Laurence M. McHeffey argued the cause for appellant (Hanlon, Dempsey & McHeffey, attorneys).
Hugh Porter argued the cause for respondent (Enright, Porter & Lenney, attorneys).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Botter, reported at 186 N.J.Super. 296, 302 (1981).
For reversal — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, SCHREIBER, HANDLER, POLLOCK and O'HERN —6.
For affirmance —None.