Case Name: IN the INTEREST OF Jane DOE. William Pryatel, M.D., Petitioner and Appellee v. Jane Doe, Respondent and Appellant
Court: North Dakota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: North Dakota
Decision Date: 2017-09-20
Citations: 902 N.W.2d 504
Docket Number: No. 20170322
Parties: IN the INTEREST OF Jane DOE William Pryatel, M.D., Petitioner and Appellee v. Jane Doe, Respondent and Appellant
Judges: [¶ 2] Gerald W.'VandeWalle, C.J.
Reporter: North Western Reporter 2d
Volume: 902
Pages: 504–505

Head Matter:
2017 ND 228
IN the INTEREST OF Jane DOE William Pryatel, M.D., Petitioner and Appellee v. Jane Doe, Respondent and Appellant
No. 20170322
Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Filed 9/20/2017
KaraE. Brinster, Special Assistant Attorney General, Jamestown, ND, for petitioner and appellee; on brief.
Andrew Marquart, Fargo, ND, for respondent and appellant; on brief. : '

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
[¶ 1] Jane Doe appealed the district court's order for hospitalization and involuntary treatment with medication. She argues the district court erred in finding her mentally ill and requiring treatment. She also argues the district court erred in granting the request to treat with medications. We conclude the district court's findings are supported by clear and convincing evidence and are not clearly erroneous. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶ 2] Gerald W.'VandeWalle, C.J.
Jon J. Jensen
Jerod E. Tufte
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers <