Case Name: Crystalline S. BAILEY, Appellant, v. ANCHOR PACKAGING, etc., Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2000-06-29
Citations: 216 F.3d 720
Docket Number: No. 99-4272
Parties: Crystalline S. BAILEY, Appellant, v. ANCHOR PACKAGING, etc., Appellee.
Judges: Before WOLLMAN and BEAM, Circuit Judges, and PANNER, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 216
Pages: 720–720

Head Matter:
Crystalline S. BAILEY, Appellant, v. ANCHOR PACKAGING, etc., Appellee.
No. 99-4272.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: June 14, 2000.
Filed: June 29, 2000.
Larry Joe Steele, Walnut Ridge, AR, argued, for Appellant.
Robert F. Thompson, Branch & Thompson, Paragould, AR, argued, for Appellee.
Before WOLLMAN and BEAM, Circuit Judges, and PANNER, District Judge.
. The Honorable Owen M. Panner, United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff Crystalline S. Bailey appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment for defendant Anchor Packaging on plaintiffs employment discrimination claims. We have reviewed the matter de novo and conclude that the evidence, considered in the light most favorable to Bailey, shows that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Treanor v. MCI Telecomm. Corp., 200 F.3d 570, 573 (8th Cir.2000). The district court correctly ruled that defendant took prompt and appropriate remedial action after plaintiff complained that a co-worker had sexually harassed her. See Sens a v. Nestle U.S.A. Co., 181 F.3d 958, 967 (8th Cir.1999).
We affirm the judgment of the district court.
. The Honorable Heniy Woods, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.