Case Name: Leo TOBY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2005-12-22
Citations: 917 So. 2d 309
Docket Number: No. 1D05-3926
Parties: Leo TOBY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ERVIN, DAVIS and LEWIS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 917
Pages: 309–310

Head Matter:
Leo TOBY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D05-3926.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Dec. 22, 2005.
Bill White, Public Defender; Ward L. Metzger, Assistant Public Defender; Jacksonville, for Appellant.
Charlie Crist, Attorney General; Thomas D. Winokur, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The lower court found appellant guilty of direct criminal contempt without first affording appellant an opportunity to present excusing or mitigating circumstances, as is required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.830. Because the trial court did not strictly comply with the provisions of Rule 3.830, we reverse without prejudice to the institution of proper contempt proceedings. See Garrett v. State, 876 So.2d 24, 25-26 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).
ERVIN, DAVIS and LEWIS, JJ., concur.