Case Name: Peyton Kyle MCANELLY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2017-10-03
Citations: 529 S.W.3d 925
Docket Number: No. ED 104970
Parties: Peyton Kyle MCANELLY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before James M. Dowd, C.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and Sherri B. Sullivan, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 529
Pages: 925–925

Head Matter:
Peyton Kyle MCANELLY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 104970
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FIVE.
Filed: October 3, 2017
Gwenda R. Robinson, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.
Joshua D. Hawley, Atty. Gen., Daniel N. McPherson, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.
Before James M. Dowd, C.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and Sherri B. Sullivan, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Peyton McAnelly appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no prec-edential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2)&(5).