Case Name: Praxedes DeCESPEDES and Gladys DeCespedes, and Frieda Castillo, Petitioners, v. PRUDENCE MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY OF CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1967-09-20
Citations: 202 So. 2d 561
Docket Number: No. 36203
Parties: Praxedes DeCESPEDES and Gladys DeCespedes, and Frieda Castillo, Petitioners, v. PRUDENCE MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY OF CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, Respondents.
Judges: CALDWELL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and O’CON-NELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 202
Pages: 561–561

Head Matter:
Praxedes DeCESPEDES and Gladys DeCespedes, and Frieda Castillo, Petitioners, v. PRUDENCE MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY OF CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, Respondents.
No. 36203.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Sept. 20, 1967.
Richard H. Reynolds and Horton & Schwartz, Miami, for petitioners.
Hawkesworth & Kay, Miami, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, in this cause has been certified to this court as one passing upon a question of great public interest. The decision certified to us is reported at 193 So.2d 224.
After hearing oral argument of the parties and fully considering the record and briefs, we have determined that the opinion of the district court correctly decides the question involved therein. Therefore the decision contained in the subject opinion is approved.
It is so ordered.
CALDWELL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and O'CON-NELL, JJ., concur.
DREW, J., dissents with opinion.
ERVIN, J., dissents and agrees with DREW, J.