Case Name: State of Connecticut v. Alexander J. Vasel
Court: Connecticut Circuit Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1963-02-28
Citations: 24 Conn. Supp. 319
Docket Number: File No. MV 16-3886
Parties: State of Connecticut v. Alexander J. Vasel
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Supplement
Volume: 24
Pages: 319–320

Head Matter:
State of Connecticut v. Alexander J. Vasel
Appellate Division of the Circuit Court
File No. MV 16-3886
Argued November 30, 1962
decided February 28, 1963
James N. Egan, of Hartford, for the appellant (defendant).
Richard P. Heffernan, prosecuting attorney, for the appellee (state).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The defendant was found guilty of operating an automobile while under the influence of intoxicating liquor (General Statutes §14-227) and has appealed from the judgment rendered, assigning as error that he was not, upon all the evidence, guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, and that the judgment was contrary to law and against the evidence.
There was no request for a finding of facts and no finding was made. See Cir. Ct. Eule 7.31.1. A transcript of the evidence was presented for the purpose of this appeal.
The defendant did not file a brief in accordance with Circuit Court Eule 7.45.1. No claim of error, not presented in a written brief duly filed, need be considered. Cir. Ct. Eule 7.47.3. The defendant having failed to file a brief, the appeal is dismissed.
There is no error.
Kinmonth, Dearington and Jacobs, Js., participated in this decision.