Case Name: Madeline HALL, Petitioner, v. The MIAMI BEACH FIRST NATIONAL BANK et al., Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1965-10-12
Citations: 179 So. 2d 98
Docket Number: No. 34439
Parties: Madeline HALL, Petitioner, v. The MIAMI BEACH FIRST NATIONAL BANK et al., Respondents.
Judges: THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 179
Pages: 98–98

Head Matter:
Madeline HALL, Petitioner, v. The MIAMI BEACH FIRST NATIONAL BANK et al., Respondents.
No. 34439.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Oct. 12, 1965.
L. Barry Keyfetz and Kaplan, Ser, Abrams & O’Malley, Miami, for petitioner.
Lally, Miller & Hodges, Miami, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date April 26, 1965.
We find thit oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
The petition for attorneys' fees is denied.
It is so ordered.
THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and ERVIN, JJ., concur.