Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas Joseph ISBELL, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-06-05
Citations: 522 F. App'x 204
Docket Number: No. 13-6121
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas Joseph ISBELL, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 522
Pages: 204–204

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas Joseph ISBELL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-6121.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 30, 2013.
Decided: June 5, 2013.
Thomas J. Isbell, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Ap-pellee.
Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Thomas J. Isbell appeals the district court's order denying a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Isbell, No. 5:06-cr-00022-RLV-DSC-18 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 15, 2013) We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.