Case Name: Jay S. WANDER and Roy L. Wander, Individually and as co-personal representative of the Estate of Arnold Wander, Deceased, Appellants, v. George L. MOXON d/b/a George L. Moxon, Esquire; Thomas (Thomas A.) & Associates, P.A., a Florida Professional Association; Thomas A. Thomas, Jr.; and Frank Thomas II, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-09-29
Citations: 624 So. 2d 409
Docket Number: No. 92-2414
Parties: Jay S. WANDER and Roy L. Wander, Individually and as co-personal representative of the Estate of Arnold Wander, Deceased, Appellants, v. George L. MOXON d/b/a George L. Moxon, Esquire; Thomas (Thomas A.) & Associates, P.A., a Florida Professional Association; Thomas A. Thomas, Jr.; and Frank Thomas II, Appellees.
Judges: ANSTEAD, FARMER and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 624
Pages: 409–409

Head Matter:
Jay S. WANDER and Roy L. Wander, Individually and as co-personal representative of the Estate of Arnold Wander, Deceased, Appellants, v. George L. MOXON d/b/a George L. Moxon, Esquire; Thomas (Thomas A.) & Associates, P.A., a Florida Professional Association; Thomas A. Thomas, Jr.; and Frank Thomas II, Appellees.
No. 92-2414.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Sept. 29, 1993.
James A.-Herb, Boca Raton, for appellants.
Arthur M. Wolff, Law Offices of Arthur M. Wolff, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees Frank Thomas, II and Thomas (Thomas A.) & Associates, P.A.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiffs appeal a final cost judgment in favor of defendant Frank Thomas, II entered following a final summary judgment for the defendants/appellees, Frank Thomas, II and Thomas (Thomas A.) & Associates, P.A.
This court reversed the final summary judgment as to defendants Frank Thomas, II and Thomas (Thomas A.) & Associates, P.A. and remanded the cause with instructions to allow the plaintiffs to present evidence in support of their claims. Wander v. Moxon, 619 So.2d 979 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). Accordingly, the cost judgment is reversed and this cause remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
ANSTEAD, FARMER and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.