Case Name: Donald Rhue HEIDBREDER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-08-13
Citations: 603 So. 2d 674
Docket Number: No. 91-1930
Parties: Donald Rhue HEIDBREDER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ZEHMER, WOLF and KAHN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 603
Pages: 674–674

Head Matter:
Donald Rhue HEIDBREDER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 91-1930.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Aug. 13, 1992.
Rehearing Denied Sept. 21, 1992.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Bradley R. Bischoff, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of conviction of attempted first degree murder is affirmed, there being no abuse of discretion by the trial court in excluding the specific testimony identified in Appellant's brief.
We likewise affirm Appellant's sentence. The trial court's decision to use the category 1 scoresheet rather than the category 9 scoresheet when sentencing Appellant is consistent with this court's decision in Hayles v. State, 596 So.2d 1236 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). As in Hayles, we certify direct conflict with Tarawneh v. State, 588 So.2d 1006 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).
AFFIRMED.
ZEHMER, WOLF and KAHN, JJ., concur.