Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William HERRING, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-07-22
Citations: 534 F. App'x 192
Docket Number: No. 13-6279
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William HERRING, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 534
Pages: 192–193

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William HERRING, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-6279.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 18, 2013.
Decided: July 22, 2013.
William Herring, Appellant, pro se. Christopher John Romano, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
William Herring appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a reduction in his sentence based on Amendment 750 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (2011). We have reviewed the record and hold the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the relief Herring sought. See United States v. Munn, 595 F.3d 183, 186 (4th Cir.2010) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Herring, No. l:10-cr- 00336-CCB-14 (D.Md. Feb. 8, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.