Case Name: Samuel COLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-07-29
Citations: 110 S.W.3d 890
Docket Number: No. WD 61292
Parties: Samuel COLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before: ULRICH, P.J., and HOWARD and NEWTON, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 110
Pages: 890–891

Head Matter:
Samuel COLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 61292.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
July 29, 2003.
Susan L. Hogan, Appellate District Defender, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Karen L. Kramer, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before: ULRICH, P.J., and HOWARD and NEWTON, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Samuel Cole appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. In his sole point on appeal, Cole alleges the hearing court clearly erred in denying his Rule 24.035 motion because he was denied effective assistance of counsel in that counsel induced him to plead guilty by telling him he would return to prison with an additional ten-year sentence if he did not plead guilty in exchange for probation. As a result, Cole argues his guilty plea was not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary.
Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).