Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Alonza RUFUS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-04-10
Citations: 518 F. App'x 168
Docket Number: No. 13-6006
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Alonza RUFUS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 518
Pages: 168–169

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Alonza RUFUS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-6006.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 28, 2013.
Decided: April 10, 2013.
Michael Alonza Rufus, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Drake, William Kenneth Wither-spoon, Assistant United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael Alonza Rufus appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a writ of error coram nobis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. See United States v. Rufus, No. 3:02-cr-00550-MBS-1 (D.S.C. Dec. 11, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.