Case Name: Harold W. NIELSON, #204559, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dr. George BETO, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1972-12-26
Citations: 470 F.2d 1177
Docket Number: No. 72-2956
Parties: Harold W. NIELSON, #204559, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dr. George BETO, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 470
Pages: 1177–1177

Head Matter:
Harold W. NIELSON, #204559, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dr. George BETO, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 72-2956
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 26, 1972.
Harold W. Nielson, pro se.
Crawford Martin, Atty. Gen., Robert Darden, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., for respondent-appellee.
Before THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, and INGRAHAM, Circuit Judges.
Rule 18, 5 Cir.; See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part. I.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Harold W. Nielson appeals the denial of his petition for habeas corpus.
For our prior opinion in this case, see Nielson v. Beto, 5 Cir., 1971, 444 F.2d 517.
For the benefit of the record, the grounds asserted in the petition for ha-beas corpus relief were:
(1) Ineffective assistance of counsel; (2) the applicant was not represented by counsel at arraignment; (3) court appointed counsel was not allowed adequate time to prepare for trial.
Upon examination of the thorough written report of the Magistrate, recommending that relief be denied, and the judgment of the District Court approving the same, and upon consideration of the briefs and record, we are of the opinion that the judgment of the District Court must be, and it is,
Affirmed.