Case Name: Carla BOUCHERIE, Appellant, v. ULTRAFLO CORPORATION and Division of Employment Security, Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2009-04-14
Citations: 280 S.W.3d 781
Docket Number: No. ED 91363
Parties: Carla BOUCHERIE, Appellant, v. ULTRAFLO CORPORATION and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.
Judges: Before KURT S. ODENWALD, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 280
Pages: 781–782

Head Matter:
Carla BOUCHERIE, Appellant, v. ULTRAFLO CORPORATION and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.
No. ED 91363.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
April 14, 2009.
Terry R. Rottler, St. Genevieve, MO, for appellant.
Ultraflo Corporation, St. Louis, MO, pro se.
Shelly A. Kintzel, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before KURT S. ODENWALD, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Carla Boucherie ("Claimant") appeals from a decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying her unemployment benefits. Claimant contends that the Commission erred in affirming the decision of the Appeals Tribunal denying her unemployment benefits because the record lacks substantial and competent evidence that she was properly discharged for misconduct. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the Commission's judgment that Claimant voluntarily left her employment is supported by substantial competent evidence. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).