Case Name: WALKER v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1929-02-27
Citations: 14 S.W.2d 1026
Docket Number: No. 12350
Parties: WALKER v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 14
Pages: 1026–1027

Head Matter:
WALKER v. STATE.
(No. 12350.)
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Feb. 27, 1929.
See, also, 6 S.W.(2d) 765.
W. A. Johnson and W. A. Anderson, both of San' Angelo, for appellant
A. A. Dawson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
LATTIMORE, J.
Conviction for theft; punishment, two years in the penitentiary.
The record shows that appellant's motion for new trial was overruled July 7, 1928, at which time notice of appeal was given. The statement of facts and bills of exception here in were filed November 1, 1928, tbis being 116 days after the notice of appeal was given. We pretermit discussion of the validity of any orders' extending the time for filing such papers. Under the terms of article 760, O. 0. P., no time can be given under any circumstances longer than 90 days, savp in case of disagreement between counsel and when the statement of facts is prepared by the court. No such facts appear here.
The state moves to strike out the statement of facts and bills of exception. The motion is well taken. The indictment correctly charges the theft of property of the value of more than $50, and is followed by the judgment and sentence.
No error appearing, the judgment will be affirmed.