Case Name: Moodie v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1951-05-21
Citations: 367 Pa. 493
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 138
Parties: Moodie v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Appellant.
Judges: Before Steen, Steaene, Jones, Ladnee and Chidsey, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 367
Pages: 493–503

Head Matter:
Moodie v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Appellant.
Argued April 13, 1951.
Before Steen, Steaene, Jones, Ladnee and Chidsey, JJ.
J. B. S. Carter, with him Guy W. Rogers, Jr. and Evans, Bayard & Frick, for appellant.
James F. Masterson, with him G. Fred DiBona, for appellee.
May 21, 1951:

Opinion:
Opinion
Per Curiam,
' The question of the defendant's negligence is indeed a close one. But, a majority of the members of the court who heard the argument of this appeal are of the opinion that the case could not properly have been taken from the jury. Consequently, the learned court below was correct in refusing the defendant's motion for judgment n.o.v. The judgment for the plaintiff is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Guerin for the court en banc.
Judgment affirmed.