Case Name: Claude PEARSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2004-06-25
Citations: 875 So. 2d 795
Docket Number: No. 2D04-1201
Parties: Claude PEARSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: WHATLEY, SALCINES, and STRINGER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 875
Pages: 795–796

Head Matter:
Claude PEARSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D04-1201.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
June 25, 2004.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Wright v. State, 864 So.2d 1153 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (en bane). As this court did in Wright, we certify direct conflict with Kirtsey v. State, 855 So.2d 177 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Hernandez v. State, 825 So.2d 513 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Bingham v. State, 813 So.2d 1021 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); Thames v. State, 769 So.2d 448 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Hampton v. State, 764 So.2d 829 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); and Macias v. State, 614 So.2d 1216 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993).
Affirmed; conflict certified.
WHATLEY, SALCINES, and STRINGER, JJ., concur.