Case Name: Jeffrey SERVIDIO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sergeant PITTMAN; Sergeant Price, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-09-15
Citations: 668 F. App'x 522
Docket Number: No. 16-6696
Parties: Jeffrey SERVIDIO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sergeant PITTMAN; Sergeant Price, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 668
Pages: 522–523

Head Matter:
Jeffrey SERVIDIO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sergeant PITTMAN; Sergeant Price, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-6696
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: September 13, 2016
Decided: September 15, 2016
Jeffrey Servidio, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly D. Grande, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before TRAXLER, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jeffrey Servidio seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion for appointment of counsel. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Servidio seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny Servidio's motion for appointment of counsel on appeal and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED