Case Name: Harry Rosenberg, Respondent, v. Saul Berman et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1947-11-03
Citations: 272 A.D.2d 1062
Docket Number: 
Parties: Harry Rosenberg, Respondent, v. Saul Berman et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 272
Pages: 1062–1062

Head Matter:
Harry Rosenberg, Respondent, v. Saul Berman et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Opinion:
As transferee of shares of stock, plaintiff seeks judgment directing appellants to account to him for the management and operation of the corporate property and that they be directed to deliver to him certificates of stock now in their possession. Order denying motion of appellants for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs. The existence of the restrictive agreement was conclusively established and, in view of the admitted circumstances, no issue is presented with respect to the application of the doctrine of estoppel. Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur; Nolan, J., not voting.