Case Name: UNITED STATES of America v. Christopher ERWIN, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-12-31
Citations: 779 F.3d 620
Docket Number: No. 13-3407
Parties: UNITED STATES of America v. Christopher ERWIN, Appellant.
Judges: Present: McKEE, Chief Judge, RENDELL, AMBRO, FUENTES, SMITH, FISHER, CHAGARES, JORDAN, HARDIMAN, GREENAWAY, VANASKIE, and KRAUSE, and NYGAARD , Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 779
Pages: 620–622

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America v. Christopher ERWIN, Appellant.
No. 13-3407.
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Dec. 31, 2014.
Mark E. Coyne, Esq., Office of United States Attorney, Newark, NJ, Norman Gross, Esq., Office of United States Attorney, Camden, NJ, for United States of America.
Jeffrey M. Brandt, Esq., Robinson & Brandt, Covington, KY, for Appellant.
Present: McKEE, Chief Judge, RENDELL, AMBRO, FUENTES, SMITH, FISHER, CHAGARES, JORDAN, HARDIMAN, GREENAWAY, VANASKIE, and KRAUSE, and NYGAARD , Circuit Judges.
Pursuant to Third Circuit I.O.P. 9.5.3., Judge Nygaard's vote is limited to panel rehearing.

Opinion:
MICHAEL A. CHAGARES, Circuit Judge.
The petition for rehearing filed by appellant in the above-entitled case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court and to all the other available circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service, and no judge who concurred in the decision having asked for rehearing, and a majority of the judges of the circuit in regular service not having voted for rehearing, the petition for rehearing by the panel and the Court en banc, is denied.
Judges Rendell, Ambro, Greenaway, and Vanaskie would have granted the petition for rehearing en banc.
OPINION SUR REHEARING