Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. David Alejandro GOMEZ-RAMIREZ, true name David Alejandro Salinas-Velasquez, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-02-15
Citations: 460 F. App'x 446
Docket Number: No. 11-40709
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. David Alejandro GOMEZ-RAMIREZ, true name David Alejandro Salinas-Velasquez, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING, JOLLY, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 460
Pages: 446–446

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. David Alejandro GOMEZ-RAMIREZ, true name David Alejandro Salinas-Velasquez, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-40709
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Feb. 15, 2012.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, H. Michael Sokolow, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before KING, JOLLY, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent David Alejandro Gomez-Ramirez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Gomez-Ramirez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected thei'em. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.