Case Name: Kevin MOORE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-08-17
Citations: 145 S.W.3d 849
Docket Number: No. ED 83378
Parties: Kevin MOORE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before MARY R. RUSSELL, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 145
Pages: 849–850

Head Matter:
Kevin MOORE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 83378.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Aug. 17, 2004.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 6, 2004.
S. Kristina Starke, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Andrea Kay Spillars, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before MARY R. RUSSELL, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Kevin Moore, appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion, without an evidentiary hearing. Movant was previously convicted, after a jury trial, of kidnapping, four counts of forcible sodomy, forcible rape and attempted forcible rape.
The judgment of the trial court in the Rule 29.15 proceeding is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).