Case Name: Carol M. LAWRENCE, Appellant, v. CURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2000-02-18
Citations: 204 F.3d 807
Docket Number: No. 99-1704
Parties: Carol M. LAWRENCE, Appellant, v. CURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI, Appellee.
Judges: Before: McMILLIAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 204
Pages: 807–812

Head Matter:
Carol M. LAWRENCE, Appellant, v. CURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI, Appellee.
No. 99-1704.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 17, 1999.
Filed Feb. 18, 2000.
Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied May 3, 2000.
Lisa S. Van Amburg, St. Louis, MO, argued, for Appellant.
Colly J. Durley, Columbia, MO, argued (Michael R. Tripp, on the brief), for Appel-lee.
Before: McMILLIAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.
Judge McMillian would grant the petition.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Carol M. Lawrence appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment to the Curators of the University of Missouri (Curators) on Lawrence's sex discrimination claim. Having reviewed the record, we conclude Lawrence is not entitled to relief. We agree with the district court's analysis that there is no substantial evidence in the record tending to show the Curators' decision for denying Lawrence's application for promotion and tenure was a pretext for sex discrimination. We thus conclude the district court correctly granted summary judgment, and we affirm for the reasons stated in its ruling without further discussion. See 8th Cir.R. 47B.