Case Name: H. Jolsen's Taendstikfabrikker Enebak and Byrn, Respondents, v. Horace K. Thurber et al. Appellants
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1890-02-25
Citations: 118 N.Y. 684
Docket Number: 
Parties: H. Jolsen’s Taendstikfabrikker Enebak and Byrn, Respondents, v. Horace K. Thurber et al. Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 118
Pages: 684–685

Head Matter:
H. Jolsen’s Taendstikfabrikker Enebak and Byrn, Respondents, v. Horace K. Thurber et al. Appellants.
(Argued January 16, 1890;
decided February 25, 1890.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made June 20, 1887, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a verdict.
This action was brought to recover damages for alleged breach of a contract to purchase all of the matches plaintiff could manufacture and ship in eight months following receipt of order.
At the close of the evidence defendants moved for a dismissal of the complaint on the ground, among others, that no such contract as alleged had been proved.
The motion was denied.
The court here, after a full examination and discussion of the evidence, reach the conclusion that the motion should have been granted.
E. More for appellants.
August Reymert for respondents.

Opinion:
Brown, J.,
reads for reversal and new trial.
All concur, Potter and Bradley, JJ., in result.
Judgment reversed.