Case Name: IN RE COMPLAINT AGAINST JOSEPH F. NARDIELLO, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW, OF UNPROFESSIONAL CONDUCT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1929-01-16
Citations: 7 N.J. Misc. 139
Docket Number: 
Parties: IN RE COMPLAINT AGAINST JOSEPH F. NARDIELLO, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW, OF UNPROFESSIONAL CONDUCT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 7
Pages: 139–139

Head Matter:
IN RE COMPLAINT AGAINST JOSEPH F. NARDIELLO, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW, OF UNPROFESSIONAL CONDUCT.
Submitted December 3, 1928
Decided January 16, 1929.
Before Justices Tbenchabd, Kalisch and Katzenbach.
Eor the applicant, Jacob L. Newman.

Opinion:
Peb Cubiam.
The petitioner was disbarred by the Supreme Court by rule entered January 17th, 1928. This application for a rehearing we think must be denied, for the reason, among others, that relief of the applicant should be obtained, if at all, by the procedure outlined in In re Meyer, 127 Atl Rep. 698, and In re Harris, 88 N. J. L. 18.
The petition will be denied, but without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to take the course indicated in the cited cases.