Case Name: Arthur MANNING, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2011-03-22
Citations: 334 S.W.3d 922
Docket Number: No. ED 94695
Parties: Arthur MANNING, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before ROY L. RICHTER, C.J., KENNETH M. ROMINES, J., and DAVID ASH, Sp. J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 334
Pages: 922–923

Head Matter:
Arthur MANNING, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 94695.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
March 22, 2011.
Jessica M. Hathaway, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Roster, Atty. Gen., Jayne T. Woods, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before ROY L. RICHTER, C.J., KENNETH M. ROMINES, J., and DAVID ASH, Sp. J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Arthur Manning appeals the motion court's denial of his 29.15 motion to vacate judgment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).