Case Name: LOMAS MORTGAGE USA, Creditor-Appellant, v. Daniel WIESE; Sue Ann Wiese, Debtors-Appellees; LOMAS MORTGAGE USA, Creditor, and Federal National Mortgage Association, Creditor-Appellee, v. Daniel WIESE; Sue Ann Wiese, Debtors-Appellants; GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Noel G. CERVANTES; Arnel J. Cervantes, Defendants-Appellees; GOLDOME REALTY CREDIT CORP., Creditor-Appellant, v. Mark Christian SAUGSTAD, f/dba/ Construction and Equipment; Kathleen Celeste Saugstad, Debtors-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1993-07-26
Citations: 998 F.2d 764
Docket Number: Nos. 91-35924, 91-35950, 91-36082, 91-36173
Parties: LOMAS MORTGAGE USA, Creditor-Appellant, v. Daniel WIESE; Sue Ann Wiese, Debtors-Appellees. LOMAS MORTGAGE USA, Creditor, and Federal National Mortgage Association, Creditor-Appellee, v. Daniel WIESE; Sue Ann Wiese, Debtors-Appellants. GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Noel G. CERVANTES; Arnel J. Cervantes, Defendants-Appellees. GOLDOME REALTY CREDIT CORP., Creditor-Appellant, v. Mark Christian SAUGSTAD, f/dba/ Construction and Equipment; Kathleen Celeste Saugstad, Debtors-Appellees.
Judges: Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Bankruptcy Reporter
Volume: 156
Pages: 764–764

Head Matter:
LOMAS MORTGAGE USA, Creditor-Appellant, v. Daniel WIESE; Sue Ann Wiese, Debtors-Appellees. LOMAS MORTGAGE USA, Creditor, and Federal National Mortgage Association, Creditor-Appellee, v. Daniel WIESE; Sue Ann Wiese, Debtors-Appellants. GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Noel G. CERVANTES; Arnel J. Cervantes, Defendants-Appellees. GOLDOME REALTY CREDIT CORP., Creditor-Appellant, v. Mark Christian SAUGSTAD, f/dba/ Construction and Equipment; Kathleen Celeste Saugstad, Debtors-Appellees.
Nos. 91-35924, 91-35950, 91-36082, 91-36173.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
July 26, 1993.
As Amended Sept. 15, 1993.
Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
The orders of the district court appealed from are vacated, and the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Nobleman v. American Savings Bank, 508 U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 2106, 124 L.Ed.2d 228.(1993).
Debtors' "Motion to Consider One Point on Remand" is DENIED, without prejudice to their raising it in the district court or bankruptcy court on remand from this court.