Case Name: William Scott DAVIS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. W. Earl BRITT; James C. Fox; James C. Dever, III; Louise W. Flanagan; Terrence W. Boyle; Malcolm J. Howard; James C. Gates; Rebecca Beach Smith, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-05-30
Citations: 690 F. App'x 842
Docket Number: No. 17-1119
Parties: William Scott DAVIS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. W. Earl BRITT; James C. Fox; James C. Dever, III; Louise W. Flanagan; Terrence W. Boyle; Malcolm J. Howard; James C. Gates; Rebecca Beach Smith, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 690
Pages: 842–842

Head Matter:
William Scott DAVIS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. W. Earl BRITT; James C. Fox; James C. Dever, III; Louise W. Flanagan; Terrence W. Boyle; Malcolm J. Howard; James C. Gates; Rebecca Beach Smith, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 17-1119
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted; May 25, 2017
Decided: May 30, 2017
William Scott Davis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
William Scott Davis, Jr., appeals the district court's order rejecting his post-judgment filings as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. Britt, No. 5:16-ct-03211-BA (E.D.N.C. Dec. 12, 2016). We deny all of Davis' pending motions, including his motions to remand and to appoint a guardian ad litem. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED