Case Name: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WAGONER COUNTY, Oklahoma, Plaintiff in Error, v. STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION OF the State of OKLAHOMA, Defendant in Error
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1961-06-13
Citations: 363 P.2d 256
Docket Number: No. 39361
Parties: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WAGONER COUNTY, Oklahoma, Plaintiff in Error, v. STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION OF the State of OKLAHOMA, Defendant in Error.
Judges: WILLIAMS, C. J., BLACKBIRD, V. C. J., and WELCH, DAVISON, HALLEY, JOHNSON and BERRY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Pacific Reporter 2d
Volume: 363
Pages: 256–257

Head Matter:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WAGONER COUNTY, Oklahoma, Plaintiff in Error, v. STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION OF the State of OKLAHOMA, Defendant in Error.
No. 39361.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
June 13, 1961.
James B: Martin, County Atty., Wagoner County, Wagoner, for plaintiff in error.
Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., Fred Hansen, First Asst. Atty. Gen., L. G. Hy-den, Asst. Atty. Gen., Albert Lynn, Gen. Counsel, Oklahoma Tax Commission, Ed Armstrong, Asst. Counsel, Oklahoma Tax Commission, Oklahoma City, for defendant in error.
Otjen & Carter, by Frank Carter, Enid, for Oklahoma Farm Bureau, amicus curiae.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff in error appeals from the same order of the State Board of Equalization that was appealed from in other cases, including Cause No. 39321. Okl., 363 P.2d 242. As to Wagoner County, here involved, the order required the same respective percentages of increase in valuations for rural and urban property that it required in the county involved in the cited case.
There is no material difference between the arguments advanced herein by plaintiff in error and those urged under three of the appellant's propositions for reversal in Cause No. 39321. We, therefore, apply what was therein said concerning those arguments, to the arguments of plaintiff in error herein, and adopt, by reference, those pronouncements as our opinion in this case.
Affirmed, and, as in the cited case, the period for the filing of a petition for rehearing is hereby reduced to 10 days.
WILLIAMS, C. J., BLACKBIRD, V. C. J., and WELCH, DAVISON, HALLEY, JOHNSON and BERRY, JJ., concur.
IRWIN, J., concurs specially.
JACKSON, J., dissents.