Case Name: People of State of Illinois, City of Chicago, Defendant in Error, v. Earl Wilson and Marie Johnson, Plaintiffs in Error
Court: Illinois Appellate Court
Jurisdiction: Illinois
Decision Date: 1952-06-18
Citations: 347 Ill. App. 399
Docket Number: Gen. Nos. 45,701, 45,702
Parties: People of State of Illinois, City of Chicago, Defendant in Error, v. Earl Wilson and Marie Johnson, Plaintiffs in Error.
Judges: 
Reporter: Illinois Appellate Court Reports
Volume: 347
Pages: 399–400

Head Matter:
People of State of Illinois, City of Chicago, Defendant in Error, v. Earl Wilson and Marie Johnson, Plaintiffs in Error.
Gen. Nos. 45,701, 45,702.
Opinion filed June 18, 1952.
Released for publication July 17, 1952.
Maurice Scott, Jr., of Chicago, for plaintiffs in error; Maurice Scott, Jr., of Chicago, of counsel.
John S. Boyle, State’s Attorney of Cook County, of Chicago, for defendants in error; John T. Gallagher, Rudolph L. Janega, Arthur F. Manning, William J. McGah, Jr., and James A. Condon, Assistant State’s Attorneys, all of Chicago, of counsel.

Opinion:
Mr. Justice Lews
delivered the opinion of the court.
Plaintiffs in Error, Earl Wilson and Marie Johnson, were each charged with possession of narcotics. A jury trial in the municipal court of Chicago resulted in a finding that each of plaintiffs in error was guilty in the manner and form as charged in the information. The abstract of records shows the verdict of the jury and the punishment fixed by it. It does not show the entry in the municipal court of any judgment. Where, as here, the abstract fails to show any judgment entered by the trial court, there is nothing to review. Sellers v. Puritan Product Co., 217 Ill. App. 617.
For the reasons given, the writ of error is dismissed.
Writ of error dismissed.
Kilby, P. J. and Feinberg, J., concur.