Case Name: Monahan Cattle Company, a Nebraska corporation, appellee, v. Leo Goodwin et al., appellants
Court: Nebraska Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Nebraska
Decision Date: 1978-12-13
Citations: 201 Neb. 845
Docket Number: No. 42096
Parties: Monahan Cattle Company, a Nebraska corporation, appellee, v. Leo Goodwin et al., appellants.
Judges: Heard before Spencer, C. J., Pro Tem., Boslaugh, McCown, Clinton, Brodkey, and White, JJ., and Kuns, Retired District Judge.
Reporter: Nebraska Reports
Volume: 201
Pages: 845–846

Head Matter:
Monahan Cattle Company, a Nebraska corporation, appellee, v. Leo Goodwin et al., appellants.
272 N. W. 2d 774
Filed December 13, 1978.
No. 42096.
Stubbs & Metz, for appellants.
Reddish, Curtiss & Moravek, and Thomas A. Danehey, for appellee Monahan Cattle Company.
Heard before Spencer, C. J., Pro Tem., Boslaugh, McCown, Clinton, Brodkey, and White, JJ., and Kuns, Retired District Judge.

Opinion:
Spencer, C. J., Pro Tem.
This action is brought under sections 57-228 through 57-231, R. R. S. 1943, to extinguish the severed mineral interests owned of record by the defendants, and to vest the title to them in the plaintiff. The question presented is the constitutionality of these statutes as retroactively applied against these defendants. The trial court canceled the interest and vested title in the plaintiff. We reverse.
The issues involved herein are identical to those in Wheelock and Manning OO Ranches, Inc. v. Heath, Nos. 42118 and 42119, ante p. 835, 272 N. W. 2d 768 (1978). This case is therefore controlled by our decision therein that sections 57.-228, 57-229, 57-230, and 57-231, R. R. S. 1943, are unconstitutional insofar as those statutes may be interpreted to be retroactive in their operation.
The judgment of the District Court is reversed and the cause is remanded for the reasons stated.
Reversed and remanded.