Case Name: Fredrick NELSON, Appellant, v. NORDSTROM, INC., and Division of Employment Security, Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-09-04
Citations: 382 S.W.3d 192
Docket Number: No. ED 98019
Parties: Fredrick NELSON, Appellant, v. NORDSTROM, INC., and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., C.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 382
Pages: 192–193

Head Matter:
Fredrick NELSON, Appellant, v. NORDSTROM, INC., and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.
No. ED 98019.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Sept. 4, 2012.
John J. Ammann, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Kenneth Paul Carp, Clayton, MO, for respondent Nordstrom, Inc.
Ninion S. Riley, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent Division of Employment Security.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., C.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Fredrick Nelson ("Claimant") appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the dismissal of his claim for unemployment benefits because Claimant failed to participate in the scheduled hearing before the appeals tribunal. We find the Commission did not err in affirming the dismissal of Claimant's appeal. We affirm.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).