Case Name: George BRUTCHER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2011-02-08
Citations: 333 S.W.3d 516
Docket Number: No. ED 94068
Parties: George BRUTCHER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before: ROY L. RICHTER, C.J., KENNETH M. ROMINES, J., and JOHN BERKEMEYER, Sp. J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 333
Pages: 516–517

Head Matter:
George BRUTCHER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 94068.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Feb. 8, 2011.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 10, 2011.
Timothy Forneris, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, James Farnsworth, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before: ROY L. RICHTER, C.J., KENNETH M. ROMINES, J., and JOHN BERKEMEYER, Sp. J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
George Brutcher (Brutcher) appeals the Judgment of the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, the Honorable M. Edward Williams, presiding. A jury convicted Brutcher of one count of Felonious Restraint, Section 565.120 ; one count of Resisting Arrest, Section 575.150; one count of Assault of a Law Enforcement Officer, Section 565.082, one count of Class A First-Degree Assault, Section 565.050; two counts of First-Degree Burglary, Section 569.160; five counts of Armed Criminal Action, Section 571.015; one count of Victim Tampering, Section 575.270; one count of Class B First-Degree Assault, Section 565.050; and one count of Unlawful Use of a Weapon, Section 571.030. The Court sentenced Brutcher to life plus 109 years incarceration.
On appeal, Brutcher argues that the motion court erred in denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We have reviewed the briefs and the Record on Appeal, and find no error of law in this case. Thus, a written opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
AFFIRMED.
. All statutory references are to RSMo (2004).