Case Name: Ra Khem THOTH, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Lena Mae BRADLEY, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-10-05
Citations: 7 S.W.3d 457
Docket Number: No. ED 74368
Parties: Ra Khem THOTH, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Lena Mae BRADLEY, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 7
Pages: 457–457

Head Matter:
Ra Khem THOTH, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Lena Mae BRADLEY, Defendant/Respondent.
No. ED 74368.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Oct. 5, 1999.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied. Dec. 1, 1999.
Application for Transfer Denied Jan. 26, 2000.
Joseph L. Bauer, Jr., Michael L. Nep-ple, Bauer & Baebler, St. Louis, for appellant.
Carl D. Kraft, Kraft & Harfst, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff appeals from the trial court's entry of judgment in defendant's favor in accord with the jury verdict in plaintiffs negligence action. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).