Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ipolito CAMPOS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-05-03
Citations: 225 F. App'x 192
Docket Number: No. 07-6209
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Ipolito CAMPOS, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 225
Pages: 192–192

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Ipolito CAMPOS, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 07-6209.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 26, 2007.
Decided: May 3, 2007.
Ipolito Campos, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Evan DePadilla, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Ap-pellee.
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Ipolito Campos appeals the district court's order denying his self-styled motion to "Invok[e] the Inherent Equity Jurisdiction of this Court as Recognized in the Savings Clause of F.R.C.P. 60(b)," after Campos rejected the district court's notice and attempt to construe Campos' motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United, States v. Campos, No. 2:03-cr-00032-HCM, 2006 WL 3760061 (E.D.Va. Dec. 18, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.