Case Name: ASIA APPAREL, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Garrett CUNNEEN; Storm Jenkins, Defendants-Appellants, and Ripswear, Incorporated; John Does, 1-10, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-04-02
Citations: 320 F. App'x 159
Docket Number: No. 08-1957
Parties: ASIA APPAREL, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Garrett CUNNEEN; Storm Jenkins, Defendants-Appellants, and Ripswear, Incorporated; John Does, 1-10, Defendants.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 320
Pages: 159–159

Head Matter:
ASIA APPAREL, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Garrett CUNNEEN; Storm Jenkins, Defendants-Appellants, and Ripswear, Incorporated; John Does, 1-10, Defendants.
No. 08-1957.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 25, 2009.
Decided: April 2, 2009.
Garrett Cunneen, Storm Jenkins, Appellants Pro Se. James Daniel Bishop, Bishop, Capitano & Moss, PA, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Garrett Cunneen and Storm Jenkins appeal the district court's order granting Asia Apparel's motion to dismiss specified claims without prejudice and for summary judgment of claims remaining. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Asia Apparel, LLC v. Cunneen, No. 3:02-cv-00469-GCM, 2008 WL 2949244 (W.D.N.C. July 30, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.