Case Name: John C. Herrmann, Appellant, v. Bernard Schlenger, Respondent, and Lillian S. Schlenger, Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1929-03
Citations: 226 A.D. 682
Docket Number: 
Parties: John C. Herrmann, Appellant, v. Bernard Schlenger, Respondent, and Lillian S. Schlenger, Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 226
Pages: 682–683

Head Matter:
John C. Herrmann, Appellant, v. Bernard Schlenger, Respondent, and Lillian S. Schlenger, Defendant.

Opinion:
Order, in so far as it denies motion to strike out the first separate and distinct defense in the second amended answer and to dismiss the counterclaim, reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion in these respects granted, with ten dollars costs, with leave to respondent to plead over within ten days. Said defense is insufficient in law, and the counterclaim does not state facts sufficient to eon-., stitute a cause of action. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Seeger, Carswell and Seudder, JJ., concur.