Case Name: Mark CORRIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Danny TUCKER, Case Manager FCC Petersburg Camp, Virginia; Patricia R. Stansberry, Warden FCI Petersburg, Virginia, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-04-26
Citations: 519 F. App'x 195
Docket Number: No. 12-7967
Parties: Mark CORRIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Danny TUCKER, Case Manager FCC Petersburg Camp, Virginia; Patricia R. Stansberry, Warden FCI Petersburg, Virginia, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 519
Pages: 195–196

Head Matter:
Mark CORRIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Danny TUCKER, Case Manager FCC Petersburg Camp, Virginia; Patricia R. Stansberry, Warden FCI Petersburg, Virginia, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 12-7967.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 28, 2013.
Decided: April 26, 2013.
Mark Corrigan, Appellant Pro Se. Kent Pendleton Porter, Assistant United States Attorney, Daniel Patrick Shean, Office of the United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Mark Corrigan appeals the district court's order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Corrigan v. Tucker, No. 2:11-cv-00178-RAJ-TEM (E.D.Va. Sept. 11, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.