Case Name: JANE PANKIEWICZ, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. NEW JERSEY BELL TELEPHONE CO., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1968-11-14
Citations: 105 N.J. Super. 287
Docket Number: 
Parties: JANE PANKIEWICZ, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. NEW JERSEY BELL TELEPHONE CO., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 105
Pages: 287–293

Head Matter:
JANE PANKIEWICZ, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. NEW JERSEY BELL TELEPHONE CO., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued October 8,1968
Decided November 14, 1968.
Gaulkin, S. J. A. D. dissented.
Before Judges G-aulicin, Collester and Labrecque.
Mr. Andrew Lawrie argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Lawrie and Jennings, attorneys).
Mr. Robert A. Shaw argued the cause for respondent [Messrs. O’Brien, Devlin & Shaw, attorneys).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
In this proceeding for workmen's com-
pensation death benefits, which resulted from the death of petitioner's husband by heart attack, both the judge of compensation and the County Court judge in a 'de novo review, found that decedent's death was causally related to his work effort. We conclude that the findings of the County Court could reasonably have been reached on sufficient credible evidence present in the record, considering the proofs as a whole. Close v. Kordulak Bros., 44 N. J. 589, 599 (1965).
Affirmed.