Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Donald Van Schoick, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1993-11-19
Citations: 198 A.D.2d 907
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Donald Van Schoick, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 198
Pages: 907–908

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Donald Van Schoick, Appellant.
[604 NYS2d 455]

Opinion:
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his challenge to the factual sufficiency of the plea allocution (see, People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665). In any event, his argument is without merit. Defendant committed forgery in the second degree by signing a fingerprint card with a false name. It is irrelevant whether the card was blank when signed (see, People v Moore, 171 AD2d 1051, lv denied 77 NY2d 998; People v Hennessy, 133 AD2d 174; People v Kirk, 115 AD2d 758, affd 68 NY2d 722). (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Harvey, J. — Forgery, 2nd Degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Green, Fallon, Boomer and. Davis, JJ.