Case Name: Mark SCHIMPF, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1998-09-16
Citations: 717 So. 2d 165
Docket Number: No. 98-2290
Parties: Mark SCHIMPF, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: WARNER, POLEN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 717
Pages: 165–165

Head Matter:
Mark SCHIMPF, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 98-2290.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Sept. 16, 1998.
Mark Sehimpf, Perry, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Elaine Thompson, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for ap-pellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant claimed in his motion to correct sentence that his total split sentence of four years of imprisonment followed by four years of probation for the third degree felony of grand theft exceeded the five year statutory maximum and was therefore illegal. See Davis v. State, 661 So.2d 1193, 1196 (Fla. 1995). While the state agreed, the trial court mistakenly entered an order correcting a different sentence, which was ordered to run concurrently with the illegal sentence.
We remand the case for the trial court to resentence appellant in connection with Count I of case number 94-1044. The new sentence for that count shall not exceed five years.
WARNER, POLEN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.