Case Name: In the Matter of H. L., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. H. L., Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2013-02-27
Citations: 255 Or. App. 503
Docket Number: C110083MC; A150466
Parties: In the Matter of H. L., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. H. L., Appellant.
Judges: Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Nakamoto, Judge, and Egan, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 255
Pages: 503–504

Head Matter:
Submitted January 4,
reversed February 27, 2013
In the Matter of H. L., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. H. L., Appellant.
Washington County Circuit Court
C110083MC; A150466
296 P3d 1289
Susan D. Isaacs filed the brief for appellant.
Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General, and Jamie K. Contreras, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Nakamoto, Judge, and Egan, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. In her first assignment of error, she contends that the state failed to prove, by clear and convincing evidence, that, because of a mental disorder, she is unable to provide for her basic personal needs. ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state's concession, and reverse on that basis. Accordingly, we do not address appellant's other assignment of error, in which she argues that the trial court erred in not allowing her to testify at the commitment hearing.
Reversed.