Case Name: Floyd Thomas KENNEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-03-09
Citations: 650 So. 2d 1136
Docket Number: No. 94-2137
Parties: Floyd Thomas KENNEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: MICKLE, LAWRENCE, and BENTON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 650
Pages: 1136–1136

Head Matter:
Floyd Thomas KENNEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 94-2137.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
March 9, 1995.
Kenney, appellant pro se.
No appearance for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
On appeal from summary denial of a motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, we affirm with respect to nine claims. On the authority of Wilson v. State, 647 So.2d 185 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) and Gill v. State, 632 So.2d 660 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994), however, we reverse for further proceedings on appellant's claim that he would have been acquitted if his lawyer had not prevented his testimony. See Fla. R.App.P. 9.140(g). On remand, appellant is also entitled to further consideration of his claim that he would have accepted offers for negotiated pleas that his lawyer allegedly failed to communicate to him. Id.; Wilson; Young v. State, 608 So.2d 111, 113 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).
MICKLE, LAWRENCE, and BENTON, JJ., concur.