Case Name: Larry Earl RAWLINSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1972-05-23
Citations: 262 So. 2d 239
Docket Number: No. 71-1054
Parties: Larry Earl RAWLINSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 262
Pages: 239–239

Head Matter:
Larry Earl RAWLINSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 71-1054.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 23, 1972.
Philip J. Mandina, Miami, for appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.
Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellant was found guilty by a jury of two counts of robbery. He was adjudicated and sentenced to ten years imprisonment on each count to run concurrently. The proof of guilt is clearly sufficient.
On this appeal, two points are presented. The first challenges the admission of certain evidence. The point is not well taken under the rule stated in Karl v. David Ritter, Sportservice, Inc., Fla.App.1964, 164 So.2d 23. The second point is likewise unavailing because of the rule stated in State v. Melendez, Fla.1971, 244 So.2d 137.
Affirmed.