Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raul MARTINEZ-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-09-20
Citations: 19 F. App'x 587
Docket Number: No. 00-30177; D.C. No. CR-00-00070-MJP
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raul MARTINEZ-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before HUG, PREGERSON, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 19
Pages: 587–587

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raul MARTINEZ-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 00-30177.
D.C. No. CR-00-00070-MJP.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 10, 2001.
Decided Sept. 20, 2001.
Before HUG, PREGERSON, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Raul Martinez-Garcia appeals his conviction by guilty plea and sentence for one count of illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Martinez-Garcia's attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and a motion to withdraw on the ground that he does not believe the appeal has merit. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), reveals no arguable issues. Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.