Case Name: In re: Eddie GAMBLE, Sr., Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-07-13
Citations: 478 F. App'x 759
Docket Number: No. 12-1319
Parties: In re: Eddie GAMBLE, Sr., Petitioner.
Judges: Before MOTZ, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 478
Pages: 759–759

Head Matter:
In re: Eddie GAMBLE, Sr., Petitioner.
No. 12-1319.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 13, 2012.
Decided: July 13, 2012.
Eddie Gamble, Sr., Petitioner Pro Se.
Before MOTZ, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Eddie Gamble, Sr., petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2000 & Supp.2012) petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court's docket reveals that the district court entered an order denying § 2241 relief without prejudice on May 29, 2012. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Gamble's case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pau-peris. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.