Case Name: Bobby L. SCOTT, Melissa Thompson, Individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ING CLARION PARTNERS, LLC, Individually and d.b.a. Gables Residential Trust, Gables Residential Services, Inc., Lions Gables Realty Limited Partnership, Gables Gp, Inc., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-01-23
Citations: 262 F. App'x 983
Docket Number: No. 07-12407
Parties: Bobby L. SCOTT, Melissa Thompson, Individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ING CLARION PARTNERS, LLC, Individually and d.b.a. Gables Residential Trust, Gables Residential Services, Inc., Lions Gables Realty Limited Partnership, Gables Gp, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before HULL and PRYOR, Circuit Judges, and MOORE, District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 262
Pages: 983–983

Head Matter:
Bobby L. SCOTT, Melissa Thompson, Individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ING CLARION PARTNERS, LLC, Individually and d.b.a. Gables Residential Trust, Gables Residential Services, Inc., Lions Gables Realty Limited Partnership, Gables Gp, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 07-12407.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Jan. 23, 2008.
Halsey G. Knapp, Jr., Mary Lillian Walker, Kevin H. Hudson, Foltz Martin, LLC, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
Steven G. Brody, McKee Nelson LLP, New York, NY, Robert P. Hein, Fowler, Hein, Cheatwood, Passino & Williams, P.A., Dan S. McDevitt, Justin Clay Jeffries, King & Spalding, LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before HULL and PRYOR, Circuit Judges, and MOORE, District Judge.
Honorable K. Michael Moore, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Florida, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
After review and oral argument, the Court concludes that Appellants Bobby L. Scott and Melissa Thompson, proceeding individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, have not shown any reversible error in the district court's orders dated October 31, 2006 and May 7, 2007. Thus, the Court affirms those orders.
AFFIRMED.