Case Name: In re CONSTITUTIONALITY OF FRAZIER-LEMKE ACT. GALLOWAY v. UNION TRUST CO.
Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1934-12-08
Citations: 9 F. Supp. 575
Docket Number: 
Parties: In re CONSTITUTIONALITY OF FRAZIER-LEMKE ACT. GALLOWAY v. UNION TRUST CO.
Judges: Before MARTINEAU and RAGON, District Judges.
Reporter: Federal Supplement
Volume: 9
Pages: 575–575

Head Matter:
In re CONSTITUTIONALITY OF FRAZIER-LEMKE ACT. GALLOWAY v. UNION TRUST CO.
District Court, E. D. Arkansas, W. D.
Dec. 8, 1934.
J. A. Comer, of Little Rock, Ark., for bankrupt.
Rose, Hemingway, Cantrell & Lough-borough (by A. W. Dobyns), of Little Rock, Ark., for Union Trust Co., .objecting creditor.
Before MARTINEAU and RAGON, District Judges.

Opinion:
MARTINEAU, District Judge.
Only the constitutionality of the FrazierLemke Act (Bankr. Act § 75 (s), 11 USCA § 203 (s) is involved at this time.
No appellate court has passed upon this question. In a very able and comprehensive opinion, delivered November 14, 1934, by Judge Dawson of the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky, in Re William W. Radford, Sr., 8 F.Supp. 489, the constitutionality of the act was upheld. The reasoning of that decision is sound in my opinion and is adopted here.
Decrees upholding the Frazier-Lemke Act may be entered in all cases where its validity is attacked.
RAGON, District Judge, concurs in this holding.