Case Name: Barbara Lindsey CURRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Nancy A. BERRYHILL, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant-Appellee, and J. Heinbockei; Adam Steifer; Brian M. Ricci; Office of Disability Adjudication and Review; Fiona Lazimi, Defendants, and Social Security Administration, Party-in-Interest
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-03-16
Citations: 680 F. App'x 248
Docket Number: No. 16-1627
Parties: Barbara Lindsey CURRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Nancy A. BERRYHILL, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant-Appellee, and J. Heinbockei; Adam Steifer; Brian M. Ricci; Office of Disability Adjudication and Review; Fiona Lazimi, Defendants, and Social Security Administration, Party-in-Interest.
Judges: Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge,
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 680
Pages: 248–248

Head Matter:
Barbara Lindsey CURRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Nancy A. BERRYHILL, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant-Appellee, and J. Heinbockei; Adam Steifer; Brian M. Ricci; Office of Disability Adjudication and Review; Fiona Lazimi, Defendants, and Social Security Administration, Party-in-Interest.
No. 16-1627
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 14, 2017
Decided: March 16, 2017
Barbara Lindsey Curry, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Drum, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellee.
Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge,

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Barbara Lindsey Curry appeals the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's report and recommendation and affirming the Social Security Administration's decision to deny Curry disability benefits. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Curry's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, Curry has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. .We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED