Case Name: Kalu DIOGU, Plaintiff-Appellant v. FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.; Motorola, Inc., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-09-12
Citations: 242 F. App'x 231
Docket Number: No. 06-50743
Parties: Kalu DIOGU, Plaintiff-Appellant v. FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.; Motorola, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 242
Pages: 231–231

Head Matter:
Kalu DIOGU, Plaintiff-Appellant v. FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.; Motorola, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 06-50743.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Sept. 12, 2007.
Kalu Diogu, Diogu Law Firm, Houston, TX, pro se.
Brian S. Greig, Thomas Andrew Nesbitt, Sarah Renee Holland, Fulbright & Jaworski, Austin, TX, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Having considered the briefs, argument by counsel, and pertinent parts of the record, and essentially for the reasons stated by the district court, the judgment is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.