Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julius NESBITT, a/k/a Butch, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-07-01
Citations: 609 F. App'x 144
Docket Number: No. 15-6274
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Julius NESBITT, a/k/a Butch, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before DUNCAN and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and'DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 609
Pages: 144–145

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Julius NESBITT, a/k/a Butch, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-6274.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 23, 2015.
Decided: July 1, 2015.
Julius Nesbitt, Appellant Pro Se. Emmanuel Joseph Ferguson, Office of the United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before DUNCAN and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and'DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Julius Nesbitt appeals the district court's order denying his motion to correct the court's amended criminal judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. To the extent the district court's oral pronouncements at sentencing created any ambiguity, we find that its written judgment unambiguously clarified its intent. See United States v. Osborne, 345 F.3d 281, 283 n. 1 (4th Cir. 2003) (holding that when the sentencing transcript is ambiguous, we look to written criminal judgment to resolve ambiguity). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.