Case Name: Cheek and Others v. Wilson, Administrator
Court: Supreme Court of Indiana
Jurisdiction: Indiana
Decision Date: 1855-12-26
Citations: 7 Ind. 354
Docket Number: 
Parties: Cheek and Others v. Wilson, Administrator.
Judges: 
Reporter: Indiana Reports
Volume: 7
Pages: 354–355

Head Matter:
Cheek and Others v. Wilson, Administrator.
The statute of 1843 -which gave to the widow 150 dollars out of her husband's estate, for which she should not account, was meant as a provision independent of dower, or of bequests contained in a will.
Wednesday, December 26.
APPEAL from the Dearborn Circuit Court.

Opinion:
Perkins, J.—Suit
by Wilson, administrator of Damiel Lynn, deceased, against Elizabeth II. Cheek, formerly Elizabeth II. Lyrm, widow of said Daniel Lynn, deceased, on a promissory note. The surety on the note, and her now husband are sued jointly with her, but the fact is not material to be remembered. A denial of the complaint was put in. The following agreement of counsel presents the only question to be decided.
" The parties agree that if the said Elizabeth H. Cheek, who was the widow of Dcmiel Lynn, senior, deceased, who made his last will and testament, by which he bequeathed certain personal property to the said Elizabeth II, which she has accepted and received, and also a life estate in said real estate described in said will, is entitled to have of said estate 150 dollars in money or property, then there shall be credit allowed on the note on which this suit was brought of 150 dollars, and a judgment for the residue of said note, deducting the credits indorsed, against defendants. And it is further submitted to the Court to determine whether or not the property bequeathed to the said Elizabeth EL by the will, should be considered by the Court as a part of 150 dollars, or equal thereto in value."
D. S. Major and A. Brower, for the appellants.
J. T. Brown, for the appellee.
The statute which governs this case, E. S. 1843, p. 1049, gave to the widow 150 dollars out of her husband's estate, for which she was not bound in any manner to account. We think the sum independent of dower, or bequests in a will. See Kellogg et al. v. Graves et al., 5 Ind. R. 509.
The Court below should have allowed the credit.
Per Curiam.
The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, with instructions to the Circuit Court to allow said credit.