Case Name: NEW YORK & PORTO RICO S. S. CO. et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1940-07-03
Citations: 116 F.2d 799
Docket Number: 
Parties: NEW YORK & PORTO RICO S. S. CO. et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
Judges: Before SWAN, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and PATTERSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 116
Pages: 799–799

Head Matter:
NEW YORK & PORTO RICO S. S. CO. et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
July 3, 1940.
See, also, 36 F.Supp. 190.
Burlingham, Veeder, Clark & Ilupper, of New York City, for plaintiffs.
Harold M. Kennedy, U. S. Atty., of Brooklyn, N. Y., and William E. Collins, Sp. Asst, to U. S. Atty. and Dist. Counsel of U. S. Maritime Commission, of New York City, for defendants.
Before SWAN, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and PATTERSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Although it appears clear that the District Court lacks jurisdiction, we deny the motion because (1) the District Judge has not been made a party and (2) this Court lacks jurisdiction under the doctrine of In re Heilbroner, 2 Cir., 69 F.2d 643.