Case Name: ANTHONY R. DeMARCO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. FRANCIS ESTLOW, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1952-09-22
Citations: 21 N.J. Super. 356
Docket Number: 
Parties: ANTHONY R. DeMARCO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. FRANCIS ESTLOW, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 21
Pages: 356–356

Head Matter:
ANTHONY R. DeMARCO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. FRANCIS ESTLOW, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued September 15, 1952
Decided September 22, 1952.
Before Judges MoGbbhan, Btgelow and Smalley. .
Mr. James D. Stoclcwell argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Bleakly, Stoclcwell •& Zinlc, attorneys).
Mr. James M. Davis, Jr., argued the cause for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated by Judge Haneman in his opinion filed in the Chancery Division and reported in 18 N. J. Super. 30.