Case Name: Gerald T. PRICE, Appellant, v. CYBERTEL CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY, Respondent, and Gensub, Inc., Cellular Mobile Systems of Missouri, Inc., Cybertel Corporations and Crown Castle GT Company, LLC, Defendants
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2010-02-02
Citations: 302 S.W.3d 781
Docket Number: No. ED 92762
Parties: Gerald T. PRICE, Appellant, v. CYBERTEL CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY, Respondent, and Gensub, Inc., Cellular Mobile Systems of Missouri, Inc., Cybertel Corporations and Crown Castle GT Company, LLC, Defendants.
Judges: Before KURT S. ODENWALD, P.J., GEORGE W. DRAPER III, and PATRICIA L. COHEN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 302
Pages: 781–782

Head Matter:
Gerald T. PRICE, Appellant, v. CYBERTEL CELLULAR TELEPHONE COMPANY, Respondent, and Gensub, Inc., Cellular Mobile Systems of Missouri, Inc., Cybertel Corporations and Crown Castle GT Company, LLC, Defendants.
No. ED 92762.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Feb. 2, 2010.
Randall D. Sherman, Hillsboro, MO, for Appellant.
Eric D. Martin, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.
Before KURT S. ODENWALD, P.J., GEORGE W. DRAPER III, and PATRICIA L. COHEN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Gerald T. Price (hereinafter, "Landlord") appeals from the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of CyberTel Cellular Telephone Company and Crown Castle GT Co. (hereinafter and collectively referred to as "Tenant") interpreting the provisions of a lease permitting Tenant to assign its rights with respect to a wireless communications tower. Landlord raises three points on appeal.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).