Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Freddy S. CAMPBELL, a/k/a Freddy, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-10-18
Citations: 450 F. App'x 299
Docket Number: No. 11-6914
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Freddy S. CAMPBELL, a/k/a Freddy, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 450
Pages: 299–300

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Freddy S. CAMPBELL, a/k/a Freddy, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 11-6914.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 13, 2011.
Decided: Oct. 18, 2011.
Freddy S. Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. John J. Frail, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Ap-pellee.
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Freddy S. Campbell appeals the district court's order denying his motion for recon sideration of its previous order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. As the district court lacked the authority to grant reconsideration of its previous order, United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 130 S.Ct. 3530, 177 L.Ed.2d 1110 (2010), we affirm the district court's order denying reconsideration. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.