Case Name: The Honorable W. F. Blanton, as County Judge of Dade County, Florida, and Judge of the County Judge's Court, Dade County, Florida, Vernon C. Seaver and George Border, Plaintiffs in Error, vs. The State of Florida, ex rel. Biscayne Beach Theatre, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Defendant in Error
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1932-07-26
Citations: 106 Fla. 272
Docket Number: 
Parties: The Honorable W. F. Blanton, as County Judge of Dade County, Florida, and Judge of the County Judge’s Court, Dade County, Florida, Vernon C. Seaver and George Border, Plaintiffs in Error, vs. The State of Florida, ex rel. Biscayne Beach Theatre, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Defendant in Error.
Judges: Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Terrell and Brown, J.J., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 106
Pages: 272–274

Head Matter:
The Honorable W. F. Blanton, as County Judge of Dade County, Florida, and Judge of the County Judge’s Court, Dade County, Florida, Vernon C. Seaver and George Border, Plaintiffs in Error, vs. The State of Florida, ex rel. Biscayne Beach Theatre, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Defendant in Error.
143 So. 226.
En Banc.
Opinion filed July 26, 1932.
STmtts (& Bowen and A. W. Woore, for Plaintiffs in Error;
Loftin, Stohes <& Calhins, John P. Stohes and Albert B. Bernstein, for Defendant in Error.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This case is before us on writ of erro'r to a judgment in prohibition entered by the Circuit Court of Dade County prohibiting W. F. Blanton as County Judge from proceeding in the trial and disposition of an action in unlawful detainer pending in the County Judge's Court wherein certain pleas had been filed, which pleas raised the question of title to the lands involved in that suit and asserted certain equities on behalf of the defendant therein.
The judgment of the Circuit Court should be affirmed on authority of the opinions and judgments in the cases of South Florida Amusement etc. Co. v. Blanton, 95 Fla. 885, 116 Sou. 869; Hewitt vs. State ex rel., 101 Fla. 807, 135 Sou. 130; and State ex rel. vs. Hutchins, 101 Fla. 773, 135 Sou. 298 and cases cited in those opinions and it is so ordered.
Affirmed.
Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Terrell and Brown, J.J., concur.
Davis, J., concurs specially.
Ellis, J., dissents.