Case Name: Cindy Winfield, Respondent, v. Monticello Senior Housing Associates, Appellant, et al., Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2016-02-09
Citations: 136 A.D.3d 451
Docket Number: 
Parties: Cindy Winfield, Respondent, v Monticello Senior Housing Associates, Appellant, et al., Defendant.
Judges: Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Moskowitz, Richter and Gische, JJ.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 136
Pages: 451–452

Head Matter:
(February 9, 2016)
Cindy Winfield, Respondent, v Monticello Senior Housing Associates, Appellant, et al., Defendant.
[24 NYS3d 503]—

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Anil C. Singh, J.), entered April 9, 2015, which denied defendant Monticello Senior Housing Associates' motion for summary judgment as untimely, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying defendant's motion as untimely (Fine v One Bryant Park, LLC, 84 AD3d 436, 437 [1st Dept 2011]). Defendant filed its motion after the deadline set forth in the April 6, 2012 preliminary conference order. That deadline is controlling, given that there is no subsequent order or directive explicitly providing otherwise (see Freire-Crespo v 345 Park Ave. L.P., 122 AD3d 501, 502 [1st Dept 2014]). The action's conversion to e-filing on February 16, 2012, approximately two months before the order, does not warrant a different result. Further, Supreme Court properly determined that defendant failed to provide good cause for its delay in moving for summary judgment (see Brill v City of New York, 2 NY3d 648, 652-653 [2004]).
We have considered defendant's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.
Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Moskowitz, Richter and Gische, JJ.