Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Herlitz M. VANZIE, a.k.a. Stevie Wilburn, a.k.a. Santonien Flowers, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-05-28
Citations: 325 F. App'x 903
Docket Number: No. 08-15260
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Herlitz M. VANZIE, a.k.a. Stevie Wilburn, a.k.a. Santonien Flowers, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 325
Pages: 903–904

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Herlitz M. VANZIE, a.k.a. Stevie Wilburn, a.k.a. Santonien Flowers, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-15260
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
May 28, 2009.
Patricia D. Barksdale, Dineen A. Baker, Jacksonville, FL, David Paul Rhodes, A. Brian Albritton, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Herlitz M. Vanzie, Atlanta, GA, pro se.
Before BLACK, MARCUS and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
W. Charles Fletcher, appointed counsel for Herlitz M. Vanzie in this 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED* and the district court's denial of § 3582(c)(2) relief is AFFIRMED.
. Vanzie's pro se Motion to Deny Ander's Brief Filed by Court-appointed Counsel and Motion to Substitute Counsel is denied.