Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Larry Daniel HARRIS, Defendant-Appellant; United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Eugene Steward, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1999-02-04
Citations: 165 F.3d 1277
Docket Number: Nos. 97-10418, 96-10416
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Larry Daniel HARRIS, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Eugene Steward, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: SCHROEDER, WIGGINS, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 165
Pages: 1277–1283

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Larry Daniel HARRIS, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Eugene Steward, Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 97-10418, 96-10416.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Feb. 4, 1999.
Before: SCHROEDER, WIGGINS, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Order; Dissent by
Judge KOZINSKI.
ORDER
The panel has voted to deny appellants' petition for rehearing and Judge Schroeder has voted to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc. Judges Wiggins and Noonan recommend rejection of the suggestion for rehearing en banc.
The full court was advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc. An active judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en bane. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en bane consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
The petition for rehearing is denied and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is rejected.