Case Name: The County of DeSoto, State of Florida, and M. H. Harrison, C. E. McRae, F. E. Platt, Albert Carlton and H. J. Downing, Composing the Board of County Commissioners of the County of DeSoto, State of Florida, Plaintiffs in Error, v. The State of Florida ex rel. The County of Charlotte, State of Florida, Defendant in Error
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1929-03-19
Citations: 97 Fla. 373
Docket Number: 
Parties: The County of DeSoto, State of Florida, and M. H. Harrison, C. E. McRae, F. E. Platt, Albert Carlton and H. J. Downing, Composing the Board of County Commissioners of the County of DeSoto, State of Florida, Plaintiffs in Error, v. The State of Florida ex rel. The County of Charlotte, State of Florida, Defendant in Error.
Judges: Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Bupord, J. J., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 97
Pages: 373–373

Head Matter:
The County of DeSoto, State of Florida, and M. H. Harrison, C. E. McRae, F. E. Platt, Albert Carlton and H. J. Downing, Composing the Board of County Commissioners of the County of DeSoto, State of Florida, Plaintiffs in Error, v. The State of Florida ex rel. The County of Charlotte, State of Florida, Defendant in Error.
Division B.
Decision filed March 19, 1929.
R. E. Brown, for Plaintiffs in Error;
J. H. Hancock and Cooper, Knight, Adair, Cooper & Osborne, for Defendant in Error.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and arguments of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered, and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and-the same is hereby affirmed.
Affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Bupord, J. J., concur.