Case Name: SUSAN BARTON, Appellant, v. HORACE W. BARTON, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1886
Citations: 1 N.Y. St. Rep. 757
Docket Number: 
Parties: SUSAN BARTON, Appellant, v. HORACE W. BARTON, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 1
Pages: 757–757

Head Matter:
SUSAN BARTON, Appellant, v. HORACE W. BARTON, Respondent.
Amendment of answer and bill of particulars—Order permitting, IN DISCRETION OF COURT—WHEN WILL NOT BE DISTURBED ON APPEAL.
Appeal from an order permitting defendant to amend his answer and bill of particulars.
George F. Langbein, for appellant.
James W. Perry, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The propriety of granting the order was one resting entirely in the direction of the court below, and although the respondent seems to have had unusual latitude, nevertheless we cannot say that the discretion was erroneously exercised or abused.
The provisions of the Code and the spirit of the decisions in regard to amendments are very liberal, and being so are predicate of the design of the lawmakers and expounders to favor what appears best calculated to accomplish the ends of justice in each case. The extra labor imposed by the numerous resorts of the defendant, he may-be called upon to pay for in the future, and doubtless will be if the plaintiff be successful and the counsel fee already allowed be thought insufficient.
For these reasons the order appealed from is affirmed, but without costs to either party.