Case Name: Emil HORWITZ, Appellant, v. FOOD TOWN, INCORPORATED and Elmo Harelson, Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1966-11-07
Citations: 367 F.2d 584
Docket Number: No. 22979
Parties: Emil HORWITZ, Appellant, v. FOOD TOWN, INCORPORATED and Elmo Harelson, Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 367
Pages: 584–584

Head Matter:
Emil HORWITZ, Appellant, v. FOOD TOWN, INCORPORATED and Elmo Harelson, Appellees.
No. 22979.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
Nov. 7, 1966.
R. Boatner Howell, Jr., Baton Rouge, La., Hyman R. Friedman, New York City, for appellant.
Hamlet D. May, Baton Rouge, La., for appellees.
Before JONES and COLEMAN, Circuit Judges, and CHRISTENBERRY, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This was a diversity action by a real estate broker licensed under the laws of New York, but not licensed under the laws of Louisiana, for a brokerage fee. The District Court granted summary judgment for the defendants. Its opinion is reported at 241 F.Supp. 1. We are of the view that Woods v. Interstate Realty Company, 337 U.S. 535, 69 S.Ct. 1235, 93 L.Ed. 1524 (1949) is controlling and the Judgment must be
Affirmed.