Case Name: Mark GOETTE, Marsha Goette and Lois Moody, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MASP, INC., and Richard Arver Stranger, Defendants-Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1996-03-26
Citations: 922 S.W.2d 812
Docket Number: No. 68316
Parties: Mark GOETTE, Marsha Goette and Lois Moody, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MASP, INC., and Richard Arver Stranger, Defendants-Respondents.
Judges: Before CRAHAN, P.J., and CRANDALL and DOWD, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 922
Pages: 812–812

Head Matter:
Mark GOETTE, Marsha Goette and Lois Moody, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MASP, INC., and Richard Arver Stranger, Defendants-Respondents.
No. 68316.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
March 26, 1996.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 30,1996.
Application to Transfer Denied June 25,1996.
Anthony L. Anderson, Clayton, for appellants.
Sam P. Rynearson, Susan M. Moore, St. Louis, for respondents.
Before CRAHAN, P.J., and CRANDALL and DOWD, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiffs appeal the circuit court's denial of their motion nunc pro tunc and their motion for Rehearing or to Alter or Amend Judgment. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).