Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. WILLIAM MATTHEW MORTIMORE, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1988-11-23
Citations: 94 Or. App. 179
Docket Number: B71-526; CA A47988
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. WILLIAM MATTHEW MORTIMORE, Appellant.
Judges: Before Warden, Presiding Judge, and Graber, Judge, and Van Hoomissen, Judge pro tempore.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 94
Pages: 179–180

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted August 24,
affirmed November 23, 1988
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. WILLIAM MATTHEW MORTIMORE, Appellant.
(B71-526; CA A47988)
764 P2d 960
Charles M. Gudger, III, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.
Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.
Before Warden, Presiding Judge, and Graber, Judge, and Van Hoomissen, Judge pro tempore.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant raises objections to conditions of probation imposed by the trial court. Assuming that those conditions are reviewable, in the trial court, we will not consider them for the first time on appeal. State v. Kidd, 61 Or App 292, 656 P2d 391 (1983).
Affirmed.