Case Name: Frank L. PERRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2006-05-03
Citations: 927 So. 2d 228
Docket Number: No. 1D05-3344
Parties: Frank L. PERRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: KAHN, C.J., WOLF and BENTON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 927
Pages: 228–228

Head Matter:
Frank L. PERRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D05-3344.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
May 3, 2006.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Charlie Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Sherri Tolar Rollison, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
A simple "hearsay" objection fails to preserve the argument that one's Sixth Amendment confrontation right has been violated. See Mencos v. State, 909 So.2d 349, 351 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) ("The right of confrontation guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment 'differs from the kind of protection that is afforded by state evidence rules governing the admission of hearsay.' " (quoting Lopez v. State, 888 So.2d 693, 697 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004))).
AFFIRMED.
KAHN, C.J., WOLF and BENTON, JJ., concur.