Case Name: THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. MARY GARDOWSKI, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1928-06-22
Citations: 105 N.J.L. 249
Docket Number: 
Parties: THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. MARY GARDOWSKI, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 105
Pages: 249–249

Head Matter:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. MARY GARDOWSKI, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Argued May 17, 1928
Decided June 22, 1928.
For the plaintiff in error, William Reich.
For the defendant in error, George M. Hillman.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Minturn, Katzenbach, White, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Dear, JJ. 9.
For reversal — None.