Case Name: John SIMKO, Appellant, v. P.V.M. ASSOCIATES, INC., d/b/a the Center at Palm Beach, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1988-06-15
Citations: 526 So. 2d 218
Docket Number: No. 4-86-3099
Parties: John SIMKO, Appellant, v. P.V.M. ASSOCIATES, INC., d/b/a the Center at Palm Beach, Appellee.
Judges: ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 526
Pages: 218–219

Head Matter:
John SIMKO, Appellant, v. P.V.M. ASSOCIATES, INC., d/b/a the Center at Palm Beach, Appellee.
No. 4-86-3099.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
June 15, 1988.
Alan D. Sackrin of Klein & Tannen, P.A., North Miami Beach, for appellant.
Debra J. Snow and Robert M. Klein of Stephens, Lynn, Chernay & Klein, Miami, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the entry of summary judgment for the appellee because we do not believe the evidence has been sufficiently developed to determine whether the appel-lee is entitled to immunity under the line of cases exemplified by Booher v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc., 468 So.2d 985 (Fla.1985), or barred from asserting such immunity under the line of cases exemplified by Noel v. E. Ecker & Co., 445 So.2d 1142 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).
ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.