Case Name: REAGAN et al. v. DOUGHERTY
Court: Supreme Court of New Mexico
Jurisdiction: New Mexico
Decision Date: 1936-09-29
Citations: 40 N.M. 439
Docket Number: No. 4144
Parties: REAGAN et al. v. DOUGHERTY.
Judges: SADLER, C. J., and HUDSPETH, BICKLEY, and ZINN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: New Mexico Reports
Volume: 40
Pages: 439–442

Head Matter:
62 P.(2d) 810
REAGAN et al. v. DOUGHERTY.
No. 4144.
Supreme Court of New Mexico.
Sept. 29, 1936.
Rehearing Denied Dec. 7,1936.
James A. Hall and Carl A. Hatch, both of Clovis, for appellant.
Mayes & Rowley, of Clovis, for appel-lees.

Opinion:
BRICE, Justice.
From a judgment for $1,300 in favor of appellees (plaintiffs below) in a suit against appellant (defendant below) to recover a commission for the sale of real estate, this appeal has been prosecuted.
The appellant saved no record in the district court upon which to base an appeal; requested neither findings of fact nor conclusions of law; and does not contend fundamental error was committed by the trial court.
The district court made findings of fact,, which, together with the admitted facts, amply support the judgment. No objection thereto was made, nor any exception taken.
We have often decided that under such a state of the record no relief can be granted here.
The judgment of the -district court will be affirmed.
It is so ordered.
SADLER, C. J., and HUDSPETH, BICKLEY, and ZINN, JJ., concur.