Case Name: GREAT AMERICAN ASSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sharon K. ELLIOTT, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Douglas R. Elliott, deceased, Mary Ann Hooper, Defendants-Appellants, William Robert Elliott, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-03-01
Citations: 511 F. App'x 868
Docket Number: No. 12-11775
Parties: GREAT AMERICAN ASSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sharon K. ELLIOTT, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Douglas R. Elliott, deceased, Mary Ann Hooper, Defendants-Appellants, William Robert Elliott, Defendant.
Judges: Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, MARTIN and FAY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 511
Pages: 868–869

Head Matter:
GREAT AMERICAN ASSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sharon K. ELLIOTT, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Douglas R. Elliott, deceased, Mary Ann Hooper, Defendants-Appellants, William Robert Elliott, Defendant.
No. 12-11775.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
March 1, 2013.
Ronald L. Kammer, Melissa A. Gillinov, Maureen G. Pearcy, Hinshaw & Culbertson, LLP, Coral Gables, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Stephen Charles Bullock, Brannon Brown Haley & Bullock, PA, Lake City, FL, Chad S. Roberts, Spohrer & Dodd, PL, Jacksonville, FL, Jack W. Shaw, Jr., Attorney at Law, Winter Park, FL, for Defendants-Appellants.
Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, MARTIN and FAY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
This appeal involves the determination of whether a farm and ranch insurance policy affords coverage for alleged injuries and damages resulting from the insured's murder of appellants' mother, mutilation and burning of her corpse, and disposition of her remains. Appellee Great American Assurance Company ("Great American") brought a declaratory judgment action seeking a declaration from the district court that it had no duty to defend or indemnify William Robert Elliott ("Elliott") for an underlying lawsuit brought against him by his siblings in Florida State Court. The jury returned a verdict against Elliott and awarded damages in excess of $1 million. On appeal, Florida's District Court of Appeals ruled Elliott was entitled to a directed verdict on the negligent infliction of emotional distress claim and vacated the damages awarded as to that count. The property damage award was $100,000 for both siblings combined. The siblings each currently hold a final judgment against Elliott in the amount of $284,191.00.
We review de novo the district court's interpretation of an insurance policy because it is a matter of law. Admiral Ins. Co. v. Feit Mgmt. Co., 321 F.3d 1326, 1328 (11th Cir.2003). We also review de novo the district court's order granting summary judgment. Penley v. Eslinger, 605 F.3d 843, 848 (11th Cir.2010).
After reviewing the record, and reading the parties' briefs, we affirm the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Great American based upon its well-reasoned order filed on March 6, 2012.
AFFIRMED.