Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Karl Earl BEAMON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-02-04
Citations: 309 F. App'x 788
Docket Number: No. 08-7954
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Karl Earl BEAMON, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 309
Pages: 788–788

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Karl Earl BEAMON, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 08-7954.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 7, 2009.
Decided: Feb. 4, 2009.
Karl Earl Beamon, Appellant Pro Se. James Ashford Metcalfe, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before TRAXLER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Karl Earl Beamon appeals the district court's order denying his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Beamon, No. 4:99-cr-00004-JBF-l (E.D.Va. Aug. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.