Case Name: Lola M. Ross, Appellant, v. AXA Financial, Inc., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2011-10-27
Citations: 88 A.D.3d 626
Docket Number: 
Parties: Lola M. Ross, Appellant, v AXA Financial, Inc., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 88
Pages: 626–626

Head Matter:
Lola M. Ross, Appellant, v AXA Financial, Inc., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.
[931 NYS2d 504]

Opinion:
The court properly admitted the unredacted "aided report" because there was sufficient evidence that plaintiff was the source of the information therein, including the location of the accident (see Martinez v New York City Tr. Auth., 41 AD3d 174, 175 [2007]; see also McDermott v Barker, 20 AD2d 546 [1963]). In light of this and the other evidence presented at trial, the verdict was not contrary to the weight of the evidence. Concur— Andrias, J.P, Sweeny, Acosta, Freedman and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.