Case Name: Anthony Fred MARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer C. BLINKLEY, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-02-21
Citations: 555 F. App'x 264
Docket Number: No. 13-7694
Parties: Anthony Fred MARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer C. BLINKLEY, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 555
Pages: 264–264

Head Matter:
Anthony Fred MARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer C. BLINKLEY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 13-7694.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 19, 2014.
Decided: Feb. 21, 2014.
Anthony Fred Martin, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Fred Martin appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Martin v. Blinkley, No. 4:13—cv-01568-DCN, 2013 WL 5316345 (D.S.C. Sept. 20, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.