Case Name: ABOGADO v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1918-11-20
Citations: 206 S.W. 527
Docket Number: No. 5201
Parties: ABOGADO v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 206
Pages: 527–527

Head Matter:
ABOGADO v. STATE.
(No. 5201.)
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Nov. 20, 1918.)
Criminad Daw &wkey;>1099(ll) — Appeal—Statement of Fact — Verification—Certificate.
A so-called statement of facts, not verified either by agreement of the attorneys or certificate of the trial judge, is wanting in statutory essentials.
Appeal from District Court, El Paso County; W. D. Howe, Judge.
Leonardo Abogado was convicted of theft, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
E. B. Hendricks, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Opinion:
MORROW, J.
Appellant is sentenced to confinement in the penitentiary for a period of 5 years for theft of property over the value of $50.
We find no bill of exceptions bringing to our attention any complaint of the action of the trial court in the conduct of the case. There is filed with the record a paper denominated a "statement of facts." It is not verified, either by agreement of the attorneys or certificate of the trial judge, and is consequently wanting in statutory essentials. In the absence of a statement -of facts or bills of exception, there is nothing presented for review.
The judgment is affirmed.