Case Name: Porter C. Baker, appellee, v. James H. Casselman et al., appellants
Court: Nebraska Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Nebraska
Decision Date: 1930-12-16
Citations: 120 Neb. 876
Docket Number: No. 27437
Parties: Porter C. Baker, appellee, v. James H. Casselman et al., appellants.
Judges: Heard before Goss, C. J., Rose, Dean, Good, Thompson, Eberly and Day, JJ.
Reporter: Nebraska Reports
Volume: 120
Pages: 876–877

Head Matter:
Porter C. Baker, appellee, v. James H. Casselman et al., appellants.
Filed December 16, 1930.
No. 27437.
R. O. Canaday and Allen G. Fisher, for appellants.
Morrow & Morrow, contra:
Heard before Goss, C. J., Rose, Dean, Good, Thompson, Eberly and Day, JJ.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Plaintiff brought this action in the district court for Scotts Bluff county to recover for damages alleged to have been suffered by reason of the issuance of a temporary restraining order and injunction in an action wherein James H. Casselman was plaintiff and Porter C. Baker and one Wallace Beatty were defendants. Upon trial in the district court a verdict was returned in favor of plaintiff for the sum of $900, and from a judgment thereon defendants have appealed, and plaintiff has filed a cross-appeal.
We have carefully examined the record and find the same to be free from prejudicial error. The judgment of the district court is therefore
Affirmed.