Case Name: I.J.S. Fabrics, Inc., Appellant, v. Dan River, Inc., Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1982-05-13
Citations: 56 N.Y.2d 755
Docket Number: 
Parties: I.J.S. Fabrics, Inc., Appellant, v Dan River, Inc., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 56
Pages: 755–756

Head Matter:
I.J.S. Fabrics, Inc., Appellant, v Dan River, Inc., Respondent.
Submitted April 1, 1982;
decided May 13, 1982
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Martin W. Fogel for appellant.
Donald L. Kreindler and Jeffrey S. Kaplan for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order should be affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (81 AD2d 525). We but add that, under the circumstances of this case, once the parties had agreed to the deletion of the warranty clause and the appellant on that basis had accepted respondent's sales note, whether the respondent still retained and thereafter exercised its right to accept the sales note at its home office would be a question for the arbitrator(s) (cf. Matter of Prime [Jonas], 38 NY2d 570; Matter of Weinrott [Carp], 32 NY2d 190).
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.