Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesus SOTO-NAVARRO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-08-16
Citations: 44 F. App'x 268
Docket Number: No. 01-10554; D.C. No. CR-01-00538-FRZ
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jesus SOTO-NAVARRO, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 44
Pages: 268–269

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jesus SOTO-NAVARRO, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 01-10554.
D.C. No. CR-01-00538-FRZ.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 12, 2002 .
Decided Aug. 16, 2002.
Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, TASHIMA and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Jesus Soto-Navarro appeals his conviction, pursuant to a guilty plea, and sentence for conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846.
Soto-Navarro's attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and has moved to withdraw as counsel of record. Soto-Navarro has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Because our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), indicates that the plea agreement, including the waiver of the right to appeal, was entered knowingly and voluntarily, United States v. Aguilar-Muniz, 156 F.3d 974, 976 (9th Cir.1998), we enforce the waiver, grant counsel's motion to withdraw, and dismiss the appeal.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.