Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Joshua Lee BRADFORD, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-02-19
Citations: 513 F. App'x 408
Docket Number: No. 12-40373
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Joshua Lee BRADFORD, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING, CLEMENT, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 513
Pages: 408–409

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Joshua Lee BRADFORD, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-40373
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Feb. 19, 2013.
Maureen Clancy Smith, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Sherman, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Seth Kretzer, Law Offices of Seth Kret-zer, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before KING, CLEMENT, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Joshua Lee Bradford has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Bradford has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal pres ents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.