Case Name: Viola Aguero, appellant, v. Alonzo Aguero, respondent
Court: New Jersey Court of Chancery
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1931-02-02
Citations: 107 N.J. Eq. 505
Docket Number: 
Parties: Viola Aguero, appellant, v. Alonzo Aguero, respondent.
Judges: For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Daly, Donges, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 14.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 107
Pages: 505–505

Head Matter:
Viola Aguero, appellant, v. Alonzo Aguero, respondent.
[Submitted October term, 1930.
Decided February 2d, 1931.]
Messrs. Coolc & Stout, for the appellant.
Mr. Ward Kremer, for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The appellant was the petitioner in the court below seeking a divorce on the ground of extreme cruelty. The bill was dismissed and the present appeal resulted.
Our examination of the case and of the grounds of appeal discloses that a question of fact only was presented by the proofs, and we cannot say that the conclusion reached by the learned vice-chancellor was erroneous.
The decree is affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Daly, Donges, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.