Case Name: Germaine Foisy et al., Appellants, v. Penn Aluminum Inc., Respondent, et al., Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1969-01-16
Citations: 31 A.D.2d 783
Docket Number: 
Parties: Germaine Foisy et al., Appellants, v. Penn Aluminum Inc., Respondent, et al., Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 31
Pages: 783–783

Head Matter:
Germaine Foisy et al., Appellants, v. Penn Aluminum Inc., Respondent, et al., Defendant.

Opinion:
Order unanimously reversed and motion denied, without costs. Memorandum: Special Term granted defendant's motion ito dismiss plaintiffs' complaint for failure to prosecute, pursuant to CPLR 3216. Respondent admits that a note of issue was filed just prior to or simultaneous with the making of the motion to dismiss. Under these circumstances the only delay which Special Term could consider was that which occurred since the date of the filing of the note of issue (Giancone v. City of N. Y., 29 A D 2d 756). As we held in Williams v. Baker (29 A D 2d 915) the facts here presented require a denial of the motion to dismiss. (Appeal from order of Onondaga Special Term dismissing complaint.) Present—Bastow, P. J., Goldman, Del Vecchio, Marsh and Henry, JJ.