Case Name: Carlos J. MATTOS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-04-03
Citations: 560 So. 2d 261
Docket Number: No. 89-2134
Parties: Carlos J. MATTOS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 560
Pages: 261–262

Head Matter:
Carlos J. MATTOS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 89-2134.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 3, 1990.
Rehearing Denied May 24, 1990.
Bierman, Shohat & Loewy and Ira N. Loewy and Donald I. Bierman, Thornton Rothman & Ernas and David Rothman, Miami, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Richard L. Polin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
A petitioner is not entitled to relief from a judgment of conviction on a writ of cor-am nobis where the facts upon which the petition is based were known to the petitioner when the judgment was entered. Smith v. State, 400 So.2d 956 (Fla.1981); Hallman v. State, 371 So.2d 482 (Fla.1979); State v. Brick, 490 So.2d 1330 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 496 So.2d 142 (Fla.1986).
Affirmed.