Case Name: In the Interest of M.F. & D.F., Plaintiff, A.F., (Natural Mother), Appellant, D.C. (Natural Father), Defendant, v. JUVENILE OFFICER, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-08-14
Citations: 372 S.W.3d 923
Docket Number: Nos. WD 74469, WD 74470
Parties: In the Interest of M.F. & D.F., Plaintiff, A.F., (Natural Mother), Appellant, D.C. (Natural Father), Defendant, v. JUVENILE OFFICER, Respondent.
Judges: Before Division Two: VICTOR C. HOWARD, Presiding Judge, KAREN KING MITCHELL, Judge and CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 372
Pages: 923–923

Head Matter:
In the Interest of M.F. & D.F., Plaintiff, A.F., (Natural Mother), Appellant, D.C. (Natural Father), Defendant, v. JUVENILE OFFICER, Respondent.
Nos. WD 74469, WD 74470.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Aug. 14, 2012.
Gillis C. Leonard, for Appellant.
Jill R. Creed, for Respondent.
Before Division Two: VICTOR C. HOWARD, Presiding Judge, KAREN KING MITCHELL, Judge and CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
A.F. appeals from the judgments of the trial court terminating her parental rights to her children, M.F. and D.F., pursuant to section 211.447.5(8), RSMo Cum.Supp. 2011. She contends that clear, cogent, and convincing evidence did not support the trial court's finding under section 211.447.7(4) that there are no additional services which would be likely to bring about lasting parental adjustment enabling a return of the children to Mother within an ascertainable period of time. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).