Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. TONY TENUSE HANNA, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1970
Citations: 1 Or. App. 628
Docket Number: C-51481
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. TONY TENUSE HANNA, Appellant.
Judges: Before Schwab, Chief Judge and Langtry and Fogey, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 1
Pages: 628–628

Head Matter:
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. TONY TENUSE HANNA, Appellant.
(C-51481)
J. Marvin Kuhn, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, filed the brief for appellant. With him on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.
Billy L. Williamson, Portland, filed the brief for respondent. With him on the brief was George Yan Hoomissen, District Attorney, Portland.
Before Schwab, Chief Judge and Langtry and Fogey, Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Each of the defendants named, having been found guilty of a felony by a jury, appeals.
The sole contention in each appeal is that under the Constitution of the United States the defendant was entitled to have the jury instructed that to find him guilty the jurors must unanimously agree as to his guilt. This issue has been decided contra to the defendants' contention in State v. Gann, 254 Or 549, 463 P2d 570, handed down by the Oregon Supreme Court on December 19, 1969.
Affirmed.
Neither of these appeals involves a first-degree murder conviction.