Case Name: CITY OF ST. LOUIS to use of UNION SAND & MATERIAL COMPANY Respondent, v. HILL-O'MEARA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY et al., Appellants
Court: St. Louis Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1913-07-16
Citations: 176 Mo. App. 656
Docket Number: 
Parties: CITY OF ST. LOUIS to use of UNION SAND & MATERIAL COMPANY Respondent, v. HILL-O’MEARA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY et al., Appellants.
Judges: Reynolds, P. J., and Nortoni, J., concur.
Reporter: Missouri Appeal Reports
Volume: 176
Pages: 656–657

Head Matter:
CITY OF ST. LOUIS to use of UNION SAND & MATERIAL COMPANY Respondent, v. HILL-O’MEARA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY et al., Appellants.
St. Louis Court of Appeals,
July 16, 1913.
City of St. Louis to use of Contracting & Supply Company v. Hill-O’Mera' Construction Company, 175 Mo. App. 555, followed.
Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court..—Hon. W. - . B. Homer, Judge.
Aeeirjued.
Robert E. Collins for appellants.
Bloch S Sullivan for respondents.

Opinion:
ALLEN, J.
This is an action npon the same bond as that sued upon in City of St. Louis to the use and for the benefit of the Contracting & Supply Company v. Hill-O'Meara Construction Company et al., decided at this term, 175 Mo. App. 555. The same questions of law are involved as in the case just referred to, and the parties through their counsel have stipulated that • in the event of the affirmance by this conrt of the judgment of the circuit court of the city of St. Louis rendered in City of St. Louis to the use and for the benefit of the Contracting & Supply Company v. Hill-O'Meara Construction Company, supra, then the judgment of the circuit court herein shall be affirmed.
Inasmuch as this court has affirmed the judgment in said Contracting & Supply Company case, and pursuant to the terms of the stipulation before us, the judgment herein should be affirmed. It is so ordered.
Reynolds, P. J., and Nortoni, J., concur.