Case Name: Wall Street Mortgage Bankers, Respondent, v. Socrates Gonzalez, Appellant, et al., Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2015-03-24
Citations: 126 A.D.3d 602
Docket Number: 
Parties: Wall Street Mortgage Bankers, Respondent, v Socrates Gonzalez, Appellant, et al., Defendants.
Judges: Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Friedman, Sweeny, Gische and Kapnick, JJ.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 126
Pages: 602–602

Head Matter:
Wall Street Mortgage Bankers, Respondent, v Socrates Gonzalez, Appellant, et al., Defendants.
[3 NYS3d 596]

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mark Friedlander, J.), entered July 10, 2013, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on its mortgage foreclosure claim against defendant Socrates Gonzalez, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff made a prima facie showing of its right to foreclosure by producing the note, mortgage and evidence of nonpayment, and, in opposition, defendant failed to raise a triable issue regarding his affirmative defenses (see Red Tulip, LLC v Neiva, 44 AD3d 204, 209 [1st Dept 2007], lv dismissed 10 NY3d 741 [2008]). The court properly disregarded the mistake in the pleadings stating that plaintiff was a Delaware corporation (see CPLR 2001), and defendant otherwise failed to establish a triable issue regarding plaintiffs standing.
We have considered defendant's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.
Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Friedman, Sweeny, Gische and Kapnick, JJ.