Case Name: Michael R. REED, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-10-04
Citations: 172 S.W.3d 925
Docket Number: No. ED 85448
Parties: Michael R. REED, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 172
Pages: 925–926

Head Matter:
Michael R. REED, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 85448.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Oct. 4, 2005.
Lisa M. Stroup, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Deborah Daniels, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Michael Reed ("Movant") appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. In his appeal, Mov-ant argues that the motion court clearly erred when it failed to find that plea counsel rendered ineffective assistance when he: (1) misinformed Movant as to the amount of time Movant would have to serve as a result of pleading guilty; (2) misinformed Movant as to the applicability of Section 558.019.3 RSMo 2000; and (3) badgered Movant into pleading guilty.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court's decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the award pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).