Case Name: David S. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ANDREW CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-03-05
Citations: 31 F. App'x 491
Docket Number: No. 01-15346; D.C. No. CV-99-00800-GEB(JFM)
Parties: David S. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ANDREW CORPORATION, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 31
Pages: 491–492

Head Matter:
David S. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ANDREW CORPORATION, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 01-15346. D.C. No. CV-99-00800-GEB(JFM).
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Feb. 13, 2002 .
Decided March 5, 2002.
Before WALLACE, KOZINSKI and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Williams's need for leave was foreseeable and he did not give the notice required by the California Family Rights Act. See Cal. Gov't Code § 12945.2(h). Because we affirm the grant of summary judgment against Williams, his request for leave to file a jury demand is moot.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.