Case Name: John LaBOVE et ux., Petitioners, v. The CITY OF GROVES, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Texas
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1980-10-29
Citations: 608 S.W.2d 162
Docket Number: No. B-9737
Parties: John LaBOVE et ux., Petitioners, v. The CITY OF GROVES, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 608
Pages: 162–162

Head Matter:
John LaBOVE et ux., Petitioners, v. The CITY OF GROVES, Respondent.
No. B-9737.
Supreme Court of Texas.
Oct. 29, 1980.
Rehearing Denied Dec. 10, 1980.
Louis Dugas, Jr., Orange, for petitioners.
Weller, Wheelus & Green, Michael R. McGown, Beaumont, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This cause was filed by John LaBove and wife to recover damages from the City of Groves as a result of their automobile striking a manhole cover in a city street. The trial court granted City's motion for summary judgment because of the failure of petitioners to give the notice required by the City Ordinance. The court of civil appeals affirmed. 602 S.W.2d 395.
In Roberts v. Haltom City, 543 S.W.2d 75 (Tex.1976), we held that a city may be estopped by the conduct of its officials from asserting failure of compliance with the notice of claim requirement of the city ordinance. That issue is not presented here because petitioners did not plead or otherwise raise the issue of estoppel in a written answer or response to City's motion for summary judgment. See Rule 166-A(c), Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, as amended effective January 1, 1978; City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin Authority, 589 S.W.2d 671 (Tex.1979).
The application for writ of error is refused, no reversible error.