Case Name: FAULKNER ADVERTISING ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NISSAN MOTOR CORPORATION IN U.S.A. Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1990-09-27
Citations: 917 F.2d 790
Docket Number: No. 89-1548
Parties: FAULKNER ADVERTISING ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NISSAN MOTOR CORPORATION IN U.S.A. Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 917
Pages: 790–790

Head Matter:
FAULKNER ADVERTISING ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NISSAN MOTOR CORPORATION IN U.S.A. Defendant-Appellee.
No. 89-1548.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Sept. 27, 1990.
Robert Gene Levy, Frank, Bernstein, Conaway & Goldman, Baltimore, Md. (Berryl A. Speert, Harry J. Katrichis, A. David Demiray, on brief), for plaintiff-appellant.
John J. Hanson, Gibson, Dunn & Crutch-er, Los Angeles, Cal. (Peter Sullivan, Robert W. Denton, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Los Angeles, Cal., Lewis A. Noonberg, H. Mark Stichel, Piper & Marbury, Baltimore, Md., on brief), for defendant-appellee.

Opinion:
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING WITH SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING IN BANC
The appellee's petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in banc were submitted to the Court. A majority of judges having voted in a requested poll of the Court to grant rehearing in banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the rehearing in banc is granted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall be calendared for argument at the February, 1991 session of Court. Within ten days of the date of this order four additional copies of appellant's briefs, five additional copies of appellees briefs, four additional copies of appellant's reply brief shall be filed and appellee will file ten additional copies of the joint appendix.