Case Name: Mary LAMAR, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-08-31
Citations: 332 F. App'x 154
Docket Number: No. 08-2396
Parties: Mary LAMAR, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 332
Pages: 154–154

Head Matter:
Mary LAMAR, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 08-2396.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 19, 2009.
Decided: Aug. 31, 2009.
Glen D. Wasserstein, Immigration Law Group, PC, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Michael F. Hertz, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Michelle Gorden LaT-our, Assistant Director, Timothy G. Hayes, Office Of Immigration Litigation, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Petition dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Mary Lamar, a native and citizen of Trinidad and Tobago, seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals reversing the Immigration Judge's decision and denying cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b) (2006). We have reviewed the administrative record and the arguments Lamar raises in her petition and conclude that we are without jurisdiction to review the Board's determination. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i), (D) (2006); Jean v. Gonzales, 485 F.3d 475, 479-80 (4th Cir.2006); Obioha v. Gonzales, 431 F.3d 400, 405 (4th Cir.2005). We accordingly dismiss the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DISMISSED.