Case Name: BARBARA PLECITY et al., Respondents, v. DAVID I. KEILLY, Appellant
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1940-10-18
Citations: 41 Cal. App. 2d 206
Docket Number: Civ. No. 12578
Parties: BARBARA PLECITY et al., Respondents, v. DAVID I. KEILLY, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports, Second Series
Volume: 41
Pages: 206–207

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 12578.
Second Appellate District, Division Two.
October 18, 1940.]
BARBARA PLECITY et al., Respondents, v. DAVID I. KEILLY, Appellant.
Harrison Weil and Donald E. Ruppe for Appellant.
A. P. Michael Narlian for Respondents.

Opinion:
McCOMB, J.
Respondents move to dismiss the appeal or affirm the judgment on the grounds that the appeal was taken for delay and that the questions on which a decision of the cause depends are so unsubstantial as not to need further argument.
Prior to November 1, 1939, rule V, section 3 of the Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal (213 Cal. xliii) provided for the dismissal of an appeal or the affirmance of a judgment on the grounds of the present motion. However, September 29, 1939, the judicial council abrogated the section of rule V just mentioned, effective as of November 1, 1939. (Taylor v. Parsons, 39 Cal. App. (2d) 336 [102 Pac. (2d) 1096].)
Therefore, the present motion is not well taken and is denied.
Moore, P. J., and Wood, J., concurred.