Case Name: INVESTOR'S MORTGAGE & GUARANTEE CO. vs. MARY DE GAEMO, ET UX.
Court: Connecticut Superior Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1935-06-25
Citations: 2 Conn. Supp. 63
Docket Number: File #47721
Parties: INVESTOR’S MORTGAGE & GUARANTEE CO. vs. MARY DE GAEMO, ET UX.
Judges: Present: Hon. JOHN A. CORNELL, Judge.
Reporter: Connecticut Supplement
Volume: 2
Pages: 63–64

Head Matter:
INVESTOR’S MORTGAGE & GUARANTEE CO. vs. MARY DE GAEMO, ET UX.
Superior Court Fairfield County
File #47721
Present: Hon. JOHN A. CORNELL, Judge.
Dwyer Smith, Attorneys for the Plaintiff.
MEMORANDUM FILED JUNE 25, 1935.

Opinion:
CORNELL, J.
Among the other pre-requisites prescribed for the entering of a Summary Judgment is that the affidavit contain a statement to the effect that the affiant believe there is no defense to the action. Practice Book, #53.
There is not such a statement in the affidavit accompanying the motion in this instance.
Under the circumstances here, would not a judgment by default be in order? See Practice Books #47 and #187.
The instant motion is denied for the reason stated, supra.