Case Name: LEEDY et ux. v. O'CONNELL
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1935-05-13
Citations: 161 So. 385
Docket Number: 
Parties: LEEDY et ux. v. O’CONNELL,
Judges: ELLIS, P. J., and TERRELL and BUFORD, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter
Volume: 161
Pages: 385–385

Head Matter:
LEEDY et ux. v. O’CONNELL,
Supreme Court of Florida, Division B.
May 13, 1935.
Baker & Thornal, of Orlando, for appellants.
Bridges & Bridges, of Orlando, for appel-lee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said decree; it is therefore considered, ordered, and adjudged by the court that the said decree of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.
ELLIS, P. J., and TERRELL and BUFORD, JJ., concur.