Case Name: State of Connecticut v. Larson Jackson
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1990-02-01
Citations: 20 Conn. App. 824
Docket Number: 8185
Parties: State of Connecticut v. Larson Jackson
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Appellate Reports
Volume: 20
Pages: 824–824

Head Matter:
State of Connecticut v. Larson Jackson
(8185)
Spallone, Daly and Nqkcott, Js.
Argued January 5
decision released February 1, 1990
Michael A. Fitzpatrick, special public defender, for the appellant (defendant).
Richard F. Jacobson, assistant state’s attorney, with whom were Donald A. Browne, state’s attorney, and C. Robert Satti, Jr., assistant state’s attorney, for the appellee (state).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The defendant appeals his conviction, after a jury trial, of violation of the state dependency producing drug law; General Statutes § 21a-278 (b); and claims that the trial court committed reversible error denying his motion to suppress illegally seized evidence.
Our review of the record and briefs, in light of our holdings in State v. Oliver, 17 Conn. App. 108, 550 A.2d 316 (1988); State v. Rodriguez, 14 Conn. App. 574, 542 A.2d 342 (1988); and State v. Williamson, 10 Conn. App. 532, 524 A.2d 655, cert. denied, 204 Conn. 801, 525 A.2d 965 (1987); clearly indicates that the defendant's averment of error is without merit.
There is no error.