Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Luis QUINTERO-ARIAS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-01-07
Citations: 307 F. App'x 60
Docket Number: No. 08-50275
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Luis QUINTERO-ARIAS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 307
Pages: 60–61

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Luis QUINTERO-ARIAS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-50275.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 17, 2008.
Filed Jan. 7, 2009.
Joseph S. Green, Esquire, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Timothy Robert Garrison, Trial, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Jose Luis Quintero-Arias appeals from the four-month sentence imposed following the revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Quintero-Arias contends that his sentence is unreasonable because the district court relied upon the impermissible factor of "just punishment," set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(2)(A), in formulating the sentence. We disagree. The record indicates that the district court did not impose the sentence based primarily on an impermissible factor. We therefore conclude that the sentence is reasonable. See United States v. Miqbel, 444 F.3d 1173, 1182-83 (9th Cir.2006); see also United States v. Simtob, 485 F.3d 1058, 1063-64 (9th Cir.2007).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.