Case Name: Scott B. ALTIZER; J. Richard Drewery; Susan A. Camper, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF ROANOKE, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-10-22
Citations: 78 F. App'x 301
Docket Number: No. 03-1429
Parties: Scott B. ALTIZER; J. Richard Drewery; Susan A. Camper, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF ROANOKE, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before WIDENER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 78
Pages: 301–301

Head Matter:
Scott B. ALTIZER; J. Richard Drewery; Susan A. Camper, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF ROANOKE, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 03-1429.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 3, 2003.
Decided Oct. 22, 2003.
Terry N. Grimes, Terry N. Grimes, P.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellants. William M. Hackwork, Elizabeth K. Dillon, City of Roanoke, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WIDENER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Scott B. Altizer, J. Richard Drewery, and Susan A. Camper appeal the district court's order granting summary judgment to Defendant in this Title VII action alleging discriminatory failure to promote. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Altizer v. City of Roanoke, Civ.A. 7:02CV00484, 2003 WL 1456514 (W.D.Va. Mar 21, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.