Case Name: CITY OF CLARENCE, Respondent, v. Edwin P. BROCKLEMEYER, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1997-07-15
Citations: 948 S.W.2d 274
Docket Number: No. 70586
Parties: CITY OF CLARENCE, Respondent, v. Edwin P. BROCKLEMEYER, Appellant.
Judges: Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHABD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 948
Pages: 274–275

Head Matter:
CITY OF CLARENCE, Respondent, v. Edwin P. BROCKLEMEYER, Appellant.
No. 70586.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
July 15, 1997.
Loramel Patricia Shurtleff, Private Attorney, Columbia, for appellant.
James McConnell, Private Attorney, Shel-byville, for respondent.
Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHABD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Edwin P. Broeklemeyer, appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Shelby County entered after a jury found him guilty of violating Clarence City Ordinance 357, prohibiting abandoned or derelict vehicles from being left on private property and declaring the same to be a nuisance. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum, explaining the reasons for our decision, is attached solely for the use of the parties involved.