Case Name: Pernorris TAYLOR, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DAILY PLANET; Mr. Malven, Defendants-Appellees; Pernorris Taylor, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Department of Social Services; Karen Junger, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-02-06
Citations: 26 F. App'x 322
Docket Number: Nos. 01-2311, 01-2417
Parties: Pernorris TAYLOR, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DAILY PLANET; Mr. Malven, Defendants-Appellees. Pernorris Taylor, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Department of Social Services; Karen Junger, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 26
Pages: 322–323

Head Matter:
Pernorris TAYLOR, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DAILY PLANET; Mr. Malven, Defendants-Appellees. Pernorris Taylor, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Department of Social Services; Karen Junger, Defendants-Appellees.
Nos. 01-2311, 01-2417.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 31, 2002.
Decided Feb. 6, 2002.
Pernorris Taylor, Sr., Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Pernorris Taylor appeals from two district court orders dismissing without prejudice his civil complaints for failure to comply with Fed.R.Civ.P. 8, which requires a short, plain statement of the facts giving rise to each claim. Because Taylor can amend his complaints in both cases by compliance with Rule 8, and a dismissal without prejudice is generally unappealable, we dismiss the appeal. Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir.1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.