Case Name: Venna L. SPENCER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MORNINGSIDE POLICE DEPARTMENT; Town of Morningside, MD, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-11-27
Citations: 51 F. App'x 423
Docket Number: No. 02-1953
Parties: Venna L. SPENCER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MORNINGSIDE POLICE DEPARTMENT; Town of Morningside, MD, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 51
Pages: 423–423

Head Matter:
Venna L. SPENCER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MORNINGSIDE POLICE DEPARTMENT; Town of Morningside, MD, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 02-1953.
United States Court of Appeal's, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 21, 2002.
Decided Nov. 27, 2002.
Yenna L. Spencer, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Karp, Allen, Karpinski, Bryant & Karp, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Venna Spencer appeals the district court's order granting Defendants' motion for summary judgment in this employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Spencer v. Momingside Police Dep't, No. CA-01-3746-PJM (D.Md. July 30, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.