Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Philip William McKINNEY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1971-12-17
Citations: 466 F.2d 1403
Docket Number: No. 71-1563
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Philip William McKINNEY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 466
Pages: 1403–1403

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Philip William McKINNEY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 71-1563.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Dec. 17, 1971.
Bertrand B. Pogrebin, Mineóla, N. Y., for defendant-appellant; Rains, Pogrebin & Scher, Mineóla, N. Y., Jack D. Young, Kimble, Schapiro, Stevens, Harcha & Young, Portsmouth, Ohio, on brief.
James F. Cook, Asst. U. S. Atty., Lexington, Ky., for plaintiff-appellee; Eugene E. Siler, Jr., U. S. Atty., Lexington, Ky., on brief.
Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and WEICK and CELEBREZZE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
In the previous appeal of this case we affirmed the judgment of the District Court but remanded for the purpose of reconsidering the five-year-sentence which was the maximum sentence provided by statute, because we were of the view that it was excessive and out of proportion to the offense. We retained jurisdiction to consider the sentence imposed upon the remand. United States v. McKinney, 427 F.2d 449 (6th Cir. 1970).
Upon remand, the District Court imposed the same maximum sentence. The Court, however, did not have the benefit of our subsequent decision in United States v. Daniels, 446 F.2d 967 (6th Cir. 1971).
We again remand for further consideration of the sentence in the light of Daniels.