Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. Darron J. MURPHY, Sr., Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee, and Jennifer L. Baker, Defendant, Cross-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-06-09
Citations: 134 F. App'x 97
Docket Number: Nos. 04-2032, 04-2293, 04-2309
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. Darron J. MURPHY, Sr., Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee, and Jennifer L. Baker, Defendant, Cross-Appellee.
Judges: Before ROVNER, EVANS, and SYKES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 134
Pages: 97–98

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. Darron J. MURPHY, Sr., Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee, and Jennifer L. Baker, Defendant, Cross-Appellee.
Nos. 04-2032, 04-2293, 04-2309.
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
June 9, 2005.
Ralph M. Friederich, Office of the United States Attorney, Fairview Heights, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
James J. Gomric, Belleville, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before ROVNER, EVANS, and SYKES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
In the opinion we issued on May 4, 2005, we gave Darron J. Murphy, Sr. and Jennifer Baker 14 days in which to advise us whether they wanted a limited remand to the district court pursuant to the procedure announced in United States v. Paladino, 401 F.3d 471 (7th Cir.2005). Both defendants have responded, Baker in the affirmative and Murphy in the negative. Accordingly, we ORDER that Baker's case be REMANDED to Judge Murphy for the limited purposes specified in Paladino. The judge should tell us whether the sentence Baker received would be different now that the federal sentencing guidelines are advisory, not mandatory. As to Mr. Murphy's case, our final mandate will issue in due course.