Case Name: Michael SPENCE, et al., Appellants, v. Jeremiah W. (Jay) NIXON, Attorney General, et al., Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-04-09
Citations: 75 S.W.3d 838
Docket Number: No. WD 60516
Parties: Michael SPENCE, et al., Appellants, v. Jeremiah W. (Jay) NIXON, Attorney General, et al., Respondents.
Judges: Before HOWARD, P.J., BRECKENRIDGE and NEWTON, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 75
Pages: 838–838

Head Matter:
Michael SPENCE, et al., Appellants, v. Jeremiah W. (Jay) NIXON, Attorney General, et al., Respondents.
No. WD 60516.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
April 9, 2002.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 28, 2002.
Michael W. Spence, Farmington, pro se.
Terry A. Norton, Farmington, pro se.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Troy Allen, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondents.
Before HOWARD, P.J., BRECKENRIDGE and NEWTON, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Michael W. Spence, Terry A. Norton, Matthew J. Cook, and David B. White, inmates incarcerated in Farmington Correctional Center, appeal the trial court's dismissal of their "Class Action Petition for Declaratory Judgment." The appellants raise four points of error on appeal. The first three points do not comply with Rule 84.04(d) and, having reviewed them for plain error, this court finds that no plain error has occurred. In the appellants' fourth point, they contend that the trial court erred in dismissing their petition because they sufficiently stated a claim for declaratory relief. This court finds that the appellants' petition fails to establish a justiciable controversy. Since a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment of the trial court dismissing the petition is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).