Case Name: Terrance Alfonso DUDLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Eddie MILES; Tom Roy; Paige Lemay; Joseph Langevin; Adam Lynch; Officer Rosemary Andrews; John Ratcliffe; John Wing; Craig S. Oseland; Rick Raven; Lcie Stevenson; Jo Earhart; Shannon Reimann; Matthew Peterson; Dan Grzywinski; Michelle Hallman; Mr. Gullette; Frank Barr, in their individual and official capacities, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-03-17
Citations: 597 F. App'x 392
Docket Number: No. 14-2885
Parties: Terrance Alfonso DUDLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Eddie MILES; Tom Roy; Paige Lemay; Joseph Langevin; Adam Lynch; Officer Rosemary Andrews; John Ratcliffe; John Wing; Craig S. Oseland; Rick Raven; Lcie Stevenson; Jo Earhart; Shannon Reimann; Matthew Peterson; Dan Grzywinski; Michelle Hallman; Mr. Gullette; Frank Barr, in their individual and official capacities, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 597
Pages: 392–392

Head Matter:
Terrance Alfonso DUDLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Eddie MILES; Tom Roy; Paige Lemay; Joseph Langevin; Adam Lynch; Officer Rosemary Andrews; John Ratcliffe; John Wing; Craig S. Oseland; Rick Raven; Lcie Stevenson; Jo Earhart; Shannon Reimann; Matthew Peterson; Dan Grzywinski; Michelle Hallman; Mr. Gullette; Frank Barr, in their individual and official capacities, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 14-2885.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 23, 2015.
Filed: March 17, 2015.
Terrance Alfonso Dudley, Lino Lakes, MN, pro se.
Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Terrance Dudley appeals the district court's dismissal of his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1988 complaint for failure to comply with a court order, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). We grant Dudley leave to appeal in forma pauperis, leaving fee collection to the district court. See Henderson v. Norris, 129 F.3d 481, 484-85 (8th Cir.1997) (per curiam). We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion. See Smith v. Gold Dust Casino, 526 F.3d 402, 404-05 (8th Cir.2008). Despite warnings that dismissal could result from his failure to do so, Dudley did not follow the magistrate judge's order to file an amended complaint. See In re Reid, 197 F.3d 318, 320 (8th Cir.1999). We note the dismissal was without prejudice, which leaves Dudley free to refile his claims. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).
. The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Jeanne J. Graham, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.