Case Name: George K. YOUNG, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of HAWAII; Neil Abercrombie, in His Capacity as Governor of the State of Hawaii; David Mark Louie I, Esquire, in His Capacity as State Attorney General; County of Hawaii, as a Sub-Agency of the State of Hawaii; William P. Kenoi, in His Capacity as Mayor of the County of Hawaii; Hilo County Police Department, as a Sub-Agency of the County of Hawaii; Harry S. Kubojiri, in His Capacity as Chief of Police; John Does, 1-25; Jane Does, 1-25; Doe Corporations, 1-5; Doe Entities, 1-5, Defendants-Appellees.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2019-02-08
Citations: 915 F.3d 681
Docket Number: No. 12-17808
Parties: George K. YOUNG, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
State of HAWAII; Neil Abercrombie, in His Capacity as Governor of the State of Hawaii; David Mark Louie I, Esquire, in His Capacity as State Attorney General; County of Hawaii, as a Sub-Agency of the State of Hawaii; William P. Kenoi, in His Capacity as Mayor of the County of Hawaii; Hilo County Police Department, as a Sub-Agency of the County of Hawaii; Harry S. Kubojiri, in His Capacity as Chief of Police; John Does, 1-25; Jane Does, 1-25; Doe Corporations, 1-5; Doe Entities, 1-5, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 915
Pages: 681–682

Head Matter:
George K. YOUNG, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
State of HAWAII; Neil Abercrombie, in His Capacity as Governor of the State of Hawaii; David Mark Louie I, Esquire, in His Capacity as State Attorney General; County of Hawaii, as a Sub-Agency of the State of Hawaii; William P. Kenoi, in His Capacity as Mayor of the County of Hawaii; Hilo County Police Department, as a Sub-Agency of the County of Hawaii; Harry S. Kubojiri, in His Capacity as Chief of Police; John Does, 1-25; Jane Does, 1-25; Doe Corporations, 1-5; Doe Entities, 1-5, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 12-17808
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
FILED February 8, 2019

Opinion:
Judges Bennett did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.
ORDER
THOMAS, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition in this case shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.