Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert T. MITRIONE and Marla A. Devore, Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-08-26
Citations: 142 F. App'x 925
Docket Number: Nos. 02-4222, 02-4224
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert T. MITRIONE and Marla A. Devore, Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: Before ROVNER, EVANS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 142
Pages: 925–925

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert T. MITRIONE and Marla A. Devore, Defendants-Appellants.
Nos. 02-4222, 02-4224.
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Aug. 26, 2005.
Patrick Hansen, Linda L. Mullen, Springfield, IL, Office of the United States Attorney, Rock Island, IL, for PlaintiffAppellee.
Cathy A. Pilkington, Chicago, IL, Thomas M. Dawson, Leavenworth, KS, for Defendants-Appellants.
Before ROVNER, EVANS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
After our limited remand under United States v. Paladino, 401 F.3d 471, 483-84 (7th Cir.2005), the district judge concluded, unequivocally, that knowledge about the advisory status of the sentencing guidelines would not have affected her decision. She would have imposed the same sentence as originally imposed on both Robert Mitrione and Marla DeVore. Those sentences, we conclude, could not be viewed as unreasonable. Accordingly, the defendants' objections to their sentences are rejected, and the judgments under appeal are AFFIRMED.