Case Name: State, ex rel. Joe Shelby Riley, v. Wm. M. Rowlett, of Tampa; Thos. W. Hutson, of Miami; S. E. Driskell, of Jacksonville; James E. Crump, of Winter Haven; H. A Day, of Orlando; J. M. Mann, of Lake Butler; Eugene G. Peek, of Ocala; C. E. Tumlin, of Miami; S. G Hollingsworth, of Bradenton; and J. D. Raborn, of Trenton
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1936-02-07
Citations: 125 Fla. 577
Docket Number: 
Parties: State, ex rel. Joe Shelby Riley, v. Wm. M. Rowlett, of Tampa; Thos. W. Hutson, of Miami; S. E. Driskell, of Jacksonville; James E. Crump, of Winter Haven; H. A Day, of Orlando; J. M. Mann, of Lake Butler; Eugene G. Peek, of Ocala; C. E. Tumlin, of Miami; S. G Hollingsworth, of Bradenton; and J. D. Raborn, of Trenton.
Judges: Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 125
Pages: 577–578

Head Matter:
State, ex rel. Joe Shelby Riley, v. Wm. M. Rowlett, of Tampa; Thos. W. Hutson, of Miami; S. E. Driskell, of Jacksonville; James E. Crump, of Winter Haven; H. A Day, of Orlando; J. M. Mann, of Lake Butler; Eugene G. Peek, of Ocala; C. E. Tumlin, of Miami; S. G Hollingsworth, of Bradenton; and J. D. Raborn, of Trenton.
170 So. 317.
Opinion Filed February 7, 1936.
Elmer R. Jones, for Relator;
John W. Prunty, for Respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
— In this case the record has been examined and the questions involved found to be identical with those raised in State of Florida, ex rel. Henry Sbordy, v. Wm. M. Rowlett, et al., decided January 15, 1936. It follows that the Writ of Prohibition must be and is hereby awarded on authority of the opinion and judgment in the last mentioned case.
It is' so ordered.
Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.
Brown, J., dissents.