Case Name: FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF ARCHITECTURE, Appellant, v. Edward T. WEINER, Appellee
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1979-12-06
Citations: 377 So. 2d 705
Docket Number: No. 55544
Parties: FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF ARCHITECTURE, Appellant, v. Edward T. WEINER, Appellee.
Judges: ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, ALDERMAN and McDONALD, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 377
Pages: DCCLXXXV–DCCLXXXV

Head Matter:
FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF ARCHITECTURE, Appellant, v. Edward T. WEINER, Appellee.
No. 55544.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Dec. 6, 1979.
James C. Rinaman, Jr., and Gerald W. Weedon of Marks, Gray, Conroy & Gibbs, Jacksonville, for appellant.
M. Stephen Turner and Cass D. Vickers of Thompson, Wadsworth, Messer, Turner & Rhodes, Tallahassee, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This cause is before the Court on appeal of a final decree in mandamus rendered by the Circuit Court of the Second Judicial Circuit, in and for Leon County, Florida. The court held section 467.08(a)(b)5, Florida Statutes (1971), unconstitutional on the authority of Wasserman v. Florida State Board of Architecture, 361 So.2d 792 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla.Const.
On November 15, we reversed the decision of the district court of appeal in Was-serman, and as the purported unconstitutionality of the statute in question was the sole basis for the issuance of the peremptory writ of mandamus, it must be and hereby is vacated, and the case remanded.
It is so ordered.
ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, ALDERMAN and McDONALD, JJ., concur.
ENGLAND, C. J., and SUNDBERG, J., dissent for the reasons expressed in Justice Sundberg's dissent in our Wasserman decision.