Case Name: J. C. TURNER LUMBER CO. et al. v. WILSON & BENNETT AND REYNOLDS & ROGERS et al.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1922-10-14
Citations: 283 F. 1021
Docket Number: No. 3795
Parties: J. C. TURNER LUMBER CO. et al. v. WILSON & BENNETT AND REYNOLDS & ROGERS et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter
Volume: 283
Pages: 1021–1022

Head Matter:
J. C. TURNER LUMBER CO. et al. v. WILSON & BENNETT AND REYNOLDS & ROGERS et al.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
October 14, 1922.)
No. 3795.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Georgia; Beverly D. Evans, Judge. Suit by Frank N. Snell and another against the J. C. Turner Lumber Company and others. From a decree (Snell v. Frank Snell Sawmill Co., 271 Fed. 698) in favor of Wilson & Bennett and others, on their petition for an allowance of fees, the defendant named and others appeal.
Affirmed.
E. K. Wilcox, of Val-dosta, Ga., and Samuel Silbiger, of Brooklyn, N. Y., for appellants. Max Isaac, of Brunswick, Ga., for appellees.
Before WALKER, BRYAN, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In effect the decree appealed from was one allowing to solicitors of a party to the suit a stated fee out of a fund to the bringing of which into court the services rendered by those solicitors contributed, the party represented by them being, by a decree of the court in the case, a beneficiary of such fund. We are of opinion that the record does not show any reversible error. The decree is affirmed.