Case Name: KNECHT v. THE CITY OF CINCINNATI
Court: Ohio Circuit Court
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1899-01
Citations: 18 Ohio C.C. 875
Docket Number: 
Parties: KNECHT v. THE CITY OF CINCINNATI.
Judges: Before Smith, Swing and Cox, JJ.
Reporter: Reports of cases argued and determined in the circuit courts of Ohio
Volume: 18
Pages: 875–875

Head Matter:
(First Circuit — Hamilton Co., O., Circuit Court
Jan. Term, 1899.)
Before Smith, Swing and Cox, JJ.
KNECHT v. THE CITY OF CINCINNATI.
Intention to improve street — Notice—
The plaintiff in this case sought to set aside the assessment against his property for the improvement of Beeckman street on the ground that he received no notice of the intention to improve, and he had”no knowledge of the aotual improvement.
Peck & Shafer, for Plaintiff.
Corporation counsel, contra.

Opinion:
Swing, J.
The question raised in this case was determined in Schmidt v. Elmwood Place, 15 O. 0., 851. And after hearing the argument in this oase, and considering the authorities cited, we adhere to the ruling then made, and judgment will be entered in this case accordingly.