Case Name: Kevin HANKINS, Appellant/Plaintiff, v. CINCINNATI, INC., Respondent/Defendant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2009-03-31
Citations: 280 S.W.3d 169
Docket Number: No. ED 91226
Parties: Kevin HANKINS, Appellant/Plaintiff, v. CINCINNATI, INC., Respondent/Defendant.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 280
Pages: 169–169

Head Matter:
Kevin HANKINS, Appellant/Plaintiff, v. CINCINNATI, INC., Respondent/Defendant.
No. ED 91226.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
March 31, 2009.
Alan S. Mandel, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Patrick J. Phillips, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Kevin Hankins appeals from the judgment of the trial court following a jury verdict in favor of defendant Cincinnati, Inc., which found both Hankins and Cincinnati to be zero percent at fault, awarding no damages to Hankins. Finding no error, we affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).