Case Name: IN RE: Shapat Ahdawan NABAYA, a/k/a Norman Abbott, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-12-15
Citations: 706 F. App'x 127
Docket Number: No. 17-2257
Parties: IN RE: Shapat Ahdawan NABAYA, a/k/a Norman Abbott, Petitioner.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 706
Pages: 127–128

Head Matter:
IN RE: Shapat Ahdawan NABAYA, a/k/a Norman Abbott, Petitioner.
No. 17-2257
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: November 16, 2017
Decided: December 15, 2017
Shapat Ahdawan Nabaya, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit,
PER CURIAM:'
Shapat Ahdawan Nabaya petitions for a writ of error under the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) (2012) seeking the dismissal of the criminal charges against him. He also seeks release on bail pending appeal. We conclude that Nabaya is not entitled to relief.
Federal courts "may issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of their respective jurisdictions and agreeable to the usages and principles of law." 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) (2012). However, petitioners may not obtain relief under § 1651(a) when there is another available remedy. See United States v. Swaby, 855 F.3d 233, 238 (4th Cir. 2017); United States v. Torres, 282 F.3d 1241, 1245 (10th Cir. 2002), Because Nabaya may assert his claims following entry of a final judgment by the dis trict court, relief under § 1651(a) is not warranted.
Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of error and deny Nabaya's motion for release pending appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED