Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Chris W. PAIGE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-02-10
Citations: 120 F. App'x 412
Docket Number: No. 04-2674
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Chris W. PAIGE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Present: JACOBS, CALABRESI, Circuit Judges, and RAKOFF, District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 120
Pages: 412–413

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Chris W. PAIGE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 04-2674.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Feb. 10, 2005.
Elizabeth D. Mann, Assistant Federal Public Defender, District of Northern New York and Vermont, Burlington, VT (Alexander Bunin, Federal Public Defender, and Molly Corbett, Research and Writing Specialist, on the brief), for Appellant.
David V. Kirby, Acting United States Attorney, District of Vermont, Burlington, VT (Barbara A. Master son, Assistant United States Attorney, on the brief), for Appellee.
Present: JACOBS, CALABRESI, Circuit Judges, and RAKOFF, District Judge.
The Honorable Jed Rakoff of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
SUMMARY ORDER
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the case be REMANDED for further proceedings.
Chris W. Paige, Jr. appeals from a judgment entered on May 6, 2004 in the United States District Court for the District of Vermont (Sessions, III, C.J.), convicting him by guilty plea of engaging in an unlawful interstate firearm transaction and unlawfully possessing a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(5), (g)(3). Paige was sentenced to 30 months' imprisonment on each count, to run concurrently, two years' supervised release, and a $200 special assessment.
1. The district court did not err in calculating Paige's Guidelines sentence. See United States v. Spurgeon, 117 F.3d 641, 644 (2d Cir.1997).
2. Paige's sentence violated the Sixth Amendment. See United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 755-56, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).
For the foregoing reasons, this case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this Court's opinion in United States v. Crosby, No. 03-1675, 397 F.3d 103, 2005 U.S.App. LEXIS 1699 (2d Cir. Feb. 2, 2005).