Case Name: Erd V. CROWELL, Appellant, v. BAKER OIL TOOLS, Inc., Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1948-01-09
Citations: 165 F.2d 214
Docket Number: No. 11645
Parties: Erd V. CROWELL, Appellant, v. BAKER OIL TOOLS, Inc., Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 165
Pages: 214–214

Head Matter:
Erd V. CROWELL, Appellant, v. BAKER OIL TOOLS, Inc., Appellee.
No. 11645.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Jan. 9, 1948.
Joseph F. Westall, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
Mellin and Hanscom, of San Francisco, Cal. (Oscar A. Mellin, of San Francisco, Cal., of counsel), for appellee.
Before MATHEWS, STEPHENS, and ORR, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The order appealed from is affirmed upon the authority of Kessler v. Eldred, 206 U.S. 285, 27 S.Ct. 611, 51 L.Ed. 1065; Marshall v. Bryant Electric Co., 1 Cir., 185 F. 499; Directoplate Corporation v. Huebner-Bleistein Patents Co., 7 Cir., 44 F.2d 783; Aleograph Co. v. Electrical Research Products, 5 Cir., 82 F.2d 625; General Chemical Co. v. Standard Wholesale Phosphate & Acid Works, 4 Cir., 101 F.2d 178; United States Galvanizing & Plating Equipment Corporation v. Hanson-Van Winkle-Munning Co., 4 Cir., 104 F. 2d 856; Fretwell v. Gillette Safety Razor Co., 4 Cir., 106 F.2d 728.