Case Name: WEBSTER v. PULLMAN CO
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1936-12-02
Citations: 23 Ohio Law Abs. 210
Docket Number: No 15547
Parties: WEBSTER v PULLMAN CO
Judges: BARNES, PJ, HORNBECK and CRAIG, JJ, (2nd Dist) sitting by designation.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 23
Pages: 210–211

Head Matter:
WEBSTER v PULLMAN CO
Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist, Cuyahoga Co.
No 15547.
Decided Dec 2, 1936
Day, Young & Veach, Cleveland, and Miller, Thompson & Dunbar, for appellants. John H. McNeal, Cleveland, for appellees.
BARNES, PJ, HORNBECK and CRAIG, JJ, (2nd Dist) sitting by designation.
See also 22 Abs 670.

Opinion:
OPINION
By THE COURT
Application has been made to this court to enter upon its journal entry an order finding that its judgment in the above entitled cause is in conflict with the judgment pronounced by the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Judicial District in the case of Levin v Jacoby Brothers, Inc. (Unreported), decided May 8, 1936, (22 Abs 353), and also in conflict, with the judgment pronounced by the same court in the case of Thomas v Veering (18 Abs 343), decided October 1, 1934.
It is the universal practice of this court to lend every aid possible to have our decisions reviewed by the Supreme Court. However, the application to certify 011 the ground of conflict requires a judicial determination as to whether or not conflict exists. Measured by this standard we are unable to find such conflict. The application to certify will be overruled.
BARNES and HORNBECK, JJ, concur. CRAIG, PJ, not participating.