Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff- Appellee, v. William Gene SCRIBNER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-11-21
Citations: 300 F. App'x 589
Docket Number: No. 06-30239
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff— Appellee, v. William Gene SCRIBNER, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 300
Pages: 589–589

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff— Appellee, v. William Gene SCRIBNER, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 06-30239.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 13, 2008.
Filed Nov. 21, 2008.
James P. Hagarty, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Yakima, WA, for PlaintiffAppellee.
Lana C. Glenn, Esq., Law Offices of Lana C. Glenn, Spokane, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
William Gene Scribner appeals from the 140-month sentence imposed after he was resentenced following a limited remand pursuant to United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Scribner contends that the district court erred at resentencing by failing to consider his request for a downward departure based on sentencing entrapment. We conclude that the district court did not err in this respect because Scribner failed to renew his entrapment arguments at resentencing. See United States v. Matthews, 278 F.3d 880, 885-86 (9th Cir.2002) (en banc); see also United States v. Si, 343 F.3d 1116,1128 (9th Cir.2003).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.