Case Name: McKinley O'NEAL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1984-02-08
Citations: 444 So. 2d 1142
Docket Number: No. AT-179
Parties: McKinley O’NEAL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ERVIN, C.J., and LARRY G. SMITH and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 444
Pages: 1142–1143

Head Matter:
McKinley O’NEAL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. AT-179.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Feb. 8, 1984.
Gwendolyn N. Spivey, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Barbara Ann Butler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jacksonville, for ap-pellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
REVERSED. Donald v. State, 442 So.2d 271 (Fla. 1st DCA, 1983); Phillips v. State, 438 So.2d 886 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). Pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.030(a)(2)(A)(v), we certify to the Florida Supreme Court the following question as one of great public importance:
Is a circuit court deprived of subject-matter jurisdiction when the caption of the charging document charges the defendant[s] with felony petit theft and the body thereof cites the proper Florida Statute, § 812.014(2)(c), but the text of the charge alleges the value of the property to be less than $100 and does not specify the substantive elements of two prior petit theft convictions?
ERVIN, C.J., and LARRY G. SMITH and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.