Case Name: Claire Sugg, Respondent, v. George Wandling, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1928-12-31
Citations: 250 N.Y. 517
Docket Number: 
Parties: Claire Sugg, Respondent, v. George Wandling, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 250
Pages: 517–517

Head Matter:
Claire Sugg, Respondent, v. George Wandling, Appellant.
(Argued December 7, 1928;
decided December 31, 1928.)
Joseph Schotlland for appellant.
Maurice B. Blumenthal and Daniel W. Blumenthal for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The findings of fact support the conclusions of law made at Special Term. There are no exceptions whatever to these findings or conclusions. There are no requests to find. There are no exceptions to the admission or rejection of evidence which deserve consideration. Under these circumstances we cannot consider the questions which the appellant seeks to raise before us.
The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrews, Lehman, Kellogg and O'Brien, JJ., concur.
Judgment affirmed.