Case Name: IN RE: Kevin HOLLAND, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-04-28
Citations: 687 F. App'x 285
Docket Number: No. 17-1354
Parties: IN RE: Kevin HOLLAND, Petitioner.
Judges: Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 687
Pages: 285–285

Head Matter:
IN RE: Kevin HOLLAND, Petitioner.
No. 17-1354
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 25, 2017
Decided; April 28, 2017
Kevin Holland, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kevin Holland petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED