Case Name: Sinclair Refining Company, Respondent, v. H. C. Roulston, Inc., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1935-01
Citations: 243 A.D. 639
Docket Number: 
Parties: Sinclair Refining Company, Respondent, v. H. C. Roulston, Inc., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 243
Pages: 639–639

Head Matter:
Sinclair Refining Company, Respondent, v. H. C. Roulston, Inc., Appellant.

Opinion:
— Action for damages to the plaintiff's building by reason of the defendant's carelessness in the operation of a motor truck which, it is claimed, was driven with violence off the public highway and against plaintiff's building. Defendant's motion for a bill of particulars was denied by the Special Term because the printed forms used on said motion contain many matters having no relevancy to the plaintiff's cause of action. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, without prejudice to a renewal of said motion by the defendant upon proper papers. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.