Case Name: Michelle VANALSTINE and Matthew Vanalstine, as Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Charles Vanalstine, Appellants, v. PALMS WEST HOSPITAL, L.P., Alberto Marante, M.D., Sudhira Kulatunga, M.D., and Florida Pediatric Critical Care, P.A., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2012-06-27
Citations: 90 So. 3d 990
Docket Number: No. 4D10-4850
Parties: Michelle VANALSTINE and Matthew Vanalstine, as Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Charles Vanalstine, Appellants, v. PALMS WEST HOSPITAL, L.P., Alberto Marante, M.D., Sudhira Kulatunga, M.D., and Florida Pediatric Critical Care, P.A., Appellees.
Judges: POLEN, GROSS, JJ., and BLOOM, BETH F., Associate Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 90
Pages: 990–990

Head Matter:
Michelle VANALSTINE and Matthew Vanalstine, as Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Charles Vanalstine, Appellants, v. PALMS WEST HOSPITAL, L.P., Alberto Marante, M.D., Sudhira Kulatunga, M.D., and Florida Pediatric Critical Care, P.A., Appellees.
No. 4D10-4850.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
June 27, 2012.
Philip M. Burlington and Nichole J. Se-gal of Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A., West Palm Beach; Barry Carothers of Scott, Harris, Bryan, Barra & Jorgensen, P.A., Palm Beach Gardens; and Helen Stratigakos of Law Office of Helen Strati-gakos, Tampa, for appellants.
Donna M. Krusbe of Billing, Cochran, Lyles, Mauro & Ramsey, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee Palms West Hospital.
Mark Hicks, Dinah Stein and Shannon Kain of Hicks, Porter, Ebenfeld <& Stein, P.A., Miami; and Fann & Petruccelli, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellees Alberto Marante, M.D., Sudhira Kulatunga, M.D., and Florida Pediatric Critical Care, P.A.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This case arises from the death of a child. The parents sued a pharmacist and pharmacy for negligence in formulating and dispensing a prescription; they also sued various medical providers for malpractice in their treatment of the child for the condition caused by his ingestion of the prescription drugs. The parents settled with the pharmacist and the pharmacy and executed releases. The trial court granted the medical providers' motions for summary judgment based on the wording of the releases.
We reverse. Read as a whole, the releases "expressly reserved" the right to pursue causes of action against the medical providers for the damages resulting from their negligence when they settled with the pharmacy and pharmacist. Cf. Broz v. Rodriguez, 891 So.2d 1205, 1208 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (holding that where release against initial tortfeasor failed "to expressly reserve any rights against the subsequent tortfeasor physician," the plaintiff was barred from further pursuing her claim against the subsequent tortfeasor); see Baudo v. Bon Secours Hospital/Villa Maria Nursing Center, 684 So.2d 211 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).
POLEN, GROSS, JJ., and BLOOM, BETH F., Associate Judge, concur.