Case Name: Wendell CILLIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF YOUTH SERVICES, Walter Wood, in his individual capacity, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-04-28
Citations: 178 F. App'x 950
Docket Number: No. 05-15659
Parties: Wendell CILLIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF YOUTH SERVICES, Walter Wood, in his individual capacity, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before DUBINA, CARNES and HILL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 178
Pages: 950–950

Head Matter:
Wendell CILLIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF YOUTH SERVICES, Walter Wood, in his individual capacity, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 05-15659
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
April 28, 2006.
Donald Gordon Madison, Montgomery, AL, for Appellant.
Frederic A. Bolling, Michael E. Gurley, Camille L. Edwards, Thomas, Means, Gil-lis & Seay, P.C., Birmingham, AL, Christopher K. Whitehead, H. Lewis Gillis, Thomas, Means, Gillis & Seay, P.C., Montgomery, AL, for Appellees.
Before DUBINA, CARNES and HILL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appellant-plaintiff Wendell Cillie (Cillie) appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the appellees-defendants Alabama Department of Youth Services (DYS), and J. Walter Wood (Wood), and against Cillie's claims arising under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, (deemed abandoned after conceded by him), and against Cillie's race, gender and retaliation claims brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq.
After carefully reviewing the record on appeal and reading the parties' briefs, we affirm this appeal for the reasons stated in the thorough and well-reasoned memorandum opinion of the Honorable R. David Proctor, filed on August 31, 2005, finding that there are no material factual disputes and that the defendants were entitled to judgment as a matter of law regarding Cillie's federal claims. The judgment by the district court of the same date granting summary judgment to defendants is
AFFIRMED.