Case Name: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Baldwin
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1996-02-28
Citations: 74 Ohio St. 3d 592
Docket Number: No. 95-2529
Parties: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Baldwin.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 74
Pages: 592–593

Head Matter:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Baldwin.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Baldwin (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 592.]
(No. 95-2529
Submitted January 24, 1996
Decided February 28, 1996.)
Geoffrey Stem, Disciplinary Counsel, and Harold F. Craig III, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.
Frank J. Micheli, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We agree with the board's findings and recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.