Case Name: SAMUEL W. STEWART, Executor of the Last Will and Testament of JOHN R. PARK, Deceased, Respondent, v. ANNIE F. A. HILTON, Appellant
Court: Utah Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Utah
Decision Date: 1902-07-21
Citations: 25 Utah 160
Docket Number: No. 1369
Parties: SAMUEL W. STEWART, Executor of the Last Will and Testament of JOHN R. PARK, Deceased, Respondent, v. ANNIE F. A. HILTON, Appellant.
Judges: MINEE, C. J., and BASKIN, I., concur.
Reporter: Utah Reports
Volume: 25
Pages: 160–161

Head Matter:
SAMUEL W. STEWART, Executor of the Last Will and Testament of JOHN R. PARK, Deceased, Respondent, v. ANNIE F. A. HILTON, Appellant.
No. 1369.
(69 Pac. 1134.)
(Decided July 21, 1902.)
Appeal from the Third District Court, Salt Lake County.— Son. W. 0. Sail, Judge.
Action by the executor of the last will of John R. Park, deceased, to quiet title to certain property of which disposition was made in the will and in which property the defendant claimed an interest as widow of the deceased. From a decree in favor of the plaintiff, the defendant appealed.
Reversed on authority of Hilton v. Roylance, 25 Utah 129.
N. V. Jones, Bsg., and Messrs. Powers, Straup & Lvpp-man for appellant.
Messrs. Bennett, Sutherland, Van. Gott & Allison, Messrs. Pierce, Oritchlow & Barrette and Messrs. Stewart & Stewaa-t for respondent.

Opinion:
BARTCH, J.
This action was brought by the executor of the last will and testament of John R. Park, deceased, against the defendant, to quiet title to certain property of which disposition was made in the will, and in which property defendant claims an interest as widow of the deceased.
The defendant herein was the plaintiff in the case of Hil ton v. Roylance, 25 Utah 129, 69 Pac. 660, decided at tbe present term. Tbe evidence admitted in that case was practically tbe same as in this. Tbe decisive legal questions presented herein were involved and decided therein. Therefore, for our opinion and decision of tbe points here presented, we refer to that case, and, in accordance therewith, this case must be reversed, with costs, and remanded, with instructions to tbe court below to proceed in conformity with that opinion.
It is so ordered.
MINEE, C. J., and BASKIN, I., concur.