Case Name: BERNARD THOMAS WALKER, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada
Jurisdiction: Nevada
Decision Date: 1975-08-26
Citations: 91 Nev. 528
Docket Number: No. 7999
Parties: BERNARD THOMAS WALKER, Appellant, v THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Nevada Reports
Volume: 91
Pages: 528–528

Head Matter:
BERNARD THOMAS WALKER, Appellant, v THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.
No. 7999
August 26, 1975
539 P.2d 461
Morgan D. Harris, Public Defender, and Joseph T. Born-venture, Chief Deputy Public Defender, Clark County, for Appellant.
Robert List, Attorney General, Carson City; George E. Holt, District Attorney, and Sherman H. Simmons, Deputy District Attorney, Clark County, for Respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION
Per Curiam:
The sole issue on this appeal is whether there was sufficient evidence to sustain the lower court's discretionary act of revoking appellant's probation and executing the original sentence.
The record reflects proof of at least five substantive violations by appellant of the terms and conditions of his probation agreement. While appellant attempted to offer mitigating evidence in his own defense, none of the violations were denied. There was more than ample evidence to justify the court's action. See Lewis V. State, 90 Nev. 436, 529 P.2d 796 (1974).