Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Holly Neil BENNETT, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-02-23
Citations: 467 F. App'x 232
Docket Number: No. 12-6027
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Holly Neil BENNETT, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 467
Pages: 232–232

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Holly Neil BENNETT, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 12-6027.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 16, 2012.
Decided: Feb. 23, 2012.
Holly Neil Bennett, Appellant Pro Se. Shawn Angus Morgan, Assistant United States Attorney, Clarksburg, West Virginia; Stephen Donald Warner, Assistant United States Attorney, Elkins, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Holly Neil Bennett appeals the district court's order denying relief on Bennett's 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Bennett, No. 1:08-cr-00078-IMK-JSK-2 (N.D.W.Va. Dec. 21, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.