Case Name: CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTS CORPORATION and C. P. C. Chemical & Plastics Corporation, a Florida Corporation, Appellees, v. DI-NOC CHEMICAL ARTS, INC., Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1965-03-11
Citations: 343 F.2d 166
Docket Number: No. 9774
Parties: CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTS CORPORATION and C. P. C. Chemical & Plastics Corporation, a Florida Corporation, Appellees, v. DI-NOC CHEMICAL ARTS, INC., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 343
Pages: 166–166

Head Matter:
CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTS CORPORATION and C. P. C. Chemical & Plastics Corporation, a Florida Corporation, Appellees, v. DI-NOC CHEMICAL ARTS, INC., Appellant.
No. 9774.
United States Court of. Appeals Fourth Circuit.
Argued March 2, 1965.
Decided March 11, 1965.
H. Stephen Madsen, Cleveland, Ohio (Joseph T. Gorman, Kent, Ohio, A. Baron Holmes III, Charleston, S. C., Baker, Hostetler & Patterson, Cleveland, Ohio, and Hagood, Rivers & Young, Charleston, S. C., on brief), for appellant.
Don G. Nicholson, Miami, Fla., and Ernest F. Hollings, Charleston, S. C. (Hollings & Hawkins, Charleston, S. C., and Nicholson, Howard & Brawner, Miami, Fla., on brief), for appellees.
Before BRYAN and J. SPENCER BELL, Circuit Judges, and HUTCHE-SON, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying a foreign corporate defendant's motions to dismiss the action for lack of in personam jurisdiction and for improper venue or, in the alternative, to transfer the case under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1404(a) to the-Northern District of Ohio.
The court's order was based upon the complaint, exhibits attached thereto, and affidavits. We agree that at this stage of the case, the motions were properly denied. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
. Jurisdiction is based on 28 U.S.C.A. § 1292(b).