Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Glenny DIFO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-09-10
Citations: 615 F. App'x 666
Docket Number: No. 15-10029
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Glenny DIFO, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 615
Pages: 666–666

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Glenny DIFO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-10029
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Sept. 10, 2015.
C. Brock Brockington, John Andrew Horn, Lawrence R. Sommerfeld, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Esther Panitch, The Panitch Law Group, PC, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Esther Panitch, appointed counsel for Glenny Difo in this direct criminal filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Difo's conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.