Case Name: ESTELLE M. WEINER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT CROSS-APPELLANT, v. HOWARD M. WEINER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT CROSS-RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1974-01-08
Citations: 126 N.J. Super. 155
Docket Number: 
Parties: ESTELLE M. WEINER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT CROSS-APPELLANT, v. HOWARD M. WEINER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT CROSS-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 126
Pages: 155–155

Head Matter:
ESTELLE M. WEINER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT CROSS-APPELLANT, v. HOWARD M. WEINER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT CROSS-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued December 19, 1973
Decided January 8, 1974.
Before Judges Leonard, Allcorn and Crahay.
Mr. Howard M. Weiner, appellant-cross-respondent, argued the cause pro se.
Mr. Edward D. McKirdy argued the cause for the respondent-cross-appellant (Messrs. McKirdy and Riskin, P.A., attorneys.)

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment of the Chancery Division is affirmed essentially for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Polow.