Case Name: Theodore J. Marcus, Individually, as a Shareholder and in the Right of Millwork Trading Co., Ltd., Appellant, v. Millwork Trading Co., Ltd., et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1994-10-20
Citations: 208 A.D.2d 448
Docket Number: 
Parties: Theodore J. Marcus, Individually, as a Shareholder and in the Right of Millwork Trading Co., Ltd., Appellant, v Millwork Trading Co., Ltd., et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 208
Pages: 448–448

Head Matter:
Theodore J. Marcus, Individually, as a Shareholder and in the Right of Millwork Trading Co., Ltd., Appellant, v Millwork Trading Co., Ltd., et al., Respondents.
[618 NYS2d 1017]

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered June 1, 1994, which, inter alia, granted defendants' motion to compel arbitration, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
The issue of plaintiff's status as a shareholder in defendant Millwork Trading Co. (see, Blatt v Socket, 199 AD2d 451), and plaintiff's derivative claim against defendant Darling (see, Maresca v La Certosa, 172 AD2d 725), both fall within the scope of the broad arbitration clause contained in the shareholders' agreement. The action was also properly stayed against defendant Fung since plaintiff's claims against him raise issues similar to those against defendant Darling (see, Brown v V&R Adv., 112 AD2d 856, 861, affd 67 NY2d 772). Concur—Carro, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman, Ross and Williams, JJ.