Case Name: Richard McNEIL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-06-28
Citations: 165 S.W.3d 558
Docket Number: No. ED 84805
Parties: Richard McNEIL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 165
Pages: 558–559

Head Matter:
Richard McNEIL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 84805.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
June 28, 2005.
Gwenda R. Robinson, District Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Deborah Daniels, Lisa M. Kennedy, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Richard McNeil, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits after an evidentiary hearing his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).