Case Name: Jose Luis Cruz ALVAREZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-10-22
Citations: 400 F. App'x 266
Docket Number: No. 09-73343
Parties: Jose Luis Cruz ALVAREZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: O’SCANNLAIN, TALLMAN and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 400
Pages: 266–267

Head Matter:
Jose Luis Cruz ALVAREZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 09-73343.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 19, 2010.
Filed Oct. 22, 2010.
Nicholas W. Marchi, Carney & Marchi, PS, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner.
Gregory Darrell Mack, Esquire, Senior Litigation Counsel, Oil, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, TALLMAN and BEA, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Petitioner Jose Luis Cruz Alvarez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge's ("IJ") denial of a motion for continuance regarding his application for cancellation of removal. Our jurisdic tion is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition for review.
The IJ did not abuse his discretion in denying Alvarez's motion for a continuance because Alvarez did not demonstrate good cause. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.29; see Sandoval-Luna v. Mukasey, 526 F.3d 1243, 1247 (9th Cir.2008) (reviewing for abuse of discretion).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.