Case Name: William C. SCHERWITZ, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1994-10-13
Citations: 644 So. 2d 85
Docket Number: No. 82006
Parties: William C. SCHERWITZ, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: GRIMES, C.J., OVERTON, SHAW and HARDING, JJ., and MeDONALD, Senior Justice, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 644
Pages: 85–85

Head Matter:
William C. SCHERWITZ, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 82006.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Oct. 13, 1994.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Lyle Hitchens, Asst. Public Defender, Seventh Judicial Circuit, Daytona Beach, for petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Belle B. Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have for review Scherwitz v. State, 618 So.2d 793 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993), because of conflict with Graham v. State, 559 So.2d 343 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), on the issue of whether in resentencing a defendant after revocation of probation or community control, a court has authority to revise a guidelines score-sheet to include prior convictions that were mistakenly omitted from the original through no fault of the defendant. We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution.
In Roberts v. State, 644 So.2d 81 (Fla.1994), this Court has rejected the rationale of Graham and resolved the issue in the instant case adversely to Scherwitz's position. Therefore, we approve the decision below.
It is so ordered.
GRIMES, C.J., OVERTON, SHAW and HARDING, JJ., and MeDONALD, Senior Justice, concur.
KOGAN, J., dissents with an opinion.