Case Name: Clarence T. FOX, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Eric HOLDER, In his official capacity; Federal Bureau of Prisons, In its official capacity; Warden Darlene Drew, In her official capacity, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-10-05
Citations: 397 F. App'x 839
Docket Number: No. 10-6692
Parties: Clarence T. FOX, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Eric HOLDER, In his official capacity; Federal Bureau of Prisons, In its official capacity; Warden Darlene Drew, In her official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 397
Pages: 839–839

Head Matter:
Clarence T. FOX, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Eric HOLDER, In his official capacity; Federal Bureau of Prisons, In its official capacity; Warden Darlene Drew, In her official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 10-6692.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 28, 2010.
Decided: Oct. 5, 2010.
Clarence T. Fox, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Clarence T. Fox, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2010) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fox v. Holder, No. 2:10-cv-00780-HFF, 2010 WL 1755654 (D.S.C. Apr. 29, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.