Case Name: Juan J. Baez-Ferreira, Respondent, v. Luis A. Marte, Appellant, et al., Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2011-07-07
Citations: 86 A.D.3d 434
Docket Number: 
Parties: Juan J. Baez-Ferreira, Respondent, v Luis A. Marte, Appellant, et al., Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 86
Pages: 434–435

Head Matter:
Juan J. Baez-Ferreira, Respondent, v Luis A. Marte, Appellant, et al., Defendants.
[926 NYS2d 291]

Opinion:
The appeal is dismissed because no appeal lies from an order granted on default (see Figiel v Met Food, 48 AD3d 330 [2008]; CPLR 5511). Defendant's remedy was an application to the motion court to vacate the order (see Figiel at 330; CPLR 5015 [a] [1]).
However, were we to reach the merits we would affirm. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Catterson, DeGrasse, Abdus-Salaam and Román, JJ.