Case Name: Harold SCHWARTZ and Rita Schwartz, his wife, Appellants, v. H. MAIMIN CO., INC., and Custom Building Corporation of Broward, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1988-04-13
Citations: 523 So. 2d 1224
Docket Number: No. 87-0003
Parties: Harold SCHWARTZ and Rita Schwartz, his wife, Appellants, v. H. MAIMIN CO., INC., and Custom Building Corporation of Broward, Appellees.
Judges: HERSEY, C.J., and DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 523
Pages: 1224–1224

Head Matter:
Harold SCHWARTZ and Rita Schwartz, his wife, Appellants, v. H. MAIMIN CO., INC., and Custom Building Corporation of Broward, Appellees.
No. 87-0003.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
April 13, 1988.
Rehearing Denied May 20, 1988.
Arnold R. Ginsberg of Horton, Perse & Ginsberg and Ansel Simon & Cohn, Miami, for appellants.
Richard A. Sherman of Richard A. Sherman, P.A., and Wayne W. Pomeroy of Pom-eroy, Pomeroy & Pomeroy, Fort Lauder-dale, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the summary final judgment entered in favor of Defendant, H. Maimin Co., Inc., and remand for further proceedings. We do this because there is existent a genuine issue of material fact which pre-eludes summary disposition. That issue is the date of the delivery of the fabric cutting machine in question, which date triggers the running and applicability of section 95.031(2), Florida Statutes (1985).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
HERSEY, C.J., and DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.