Case Name: Hale v. Chatham
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1955-02-25
Citations: 91 Ga. App. 519
Docket Number: 35549
Parties: Hale v. Chatham.
Judges: Gardner, P. J., and Carlisle, J., concur.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 91
Pages: 519–520

Head Matter:
35549.
Hale v. Chatham.

Opinion:
Townsend, J.
An action brought by a real-estate broker to recover damages for breach of an alleged contract for commissions is subject to general demurrer when, it fails to allege that the broker has fully complied with the license laws of this State. (Regarding the necessity for license, see Code § 84-1413.) It is immaterial whether the point was argued and considered in the trial court or not. Cline v. Crane, 90 Ga. App. 192 (82 S. E. 2d 175); Mayo v. Lynes, 80 Ga. App. 4 (55 S. E. 2d 174); Moody v. Foster, 74 Ga. App. 829 (3) (41 S. E. 2d 560). Accordingly, the petition here by a real-estate broker, seeking to recover commissions on an alleged exclusive listing contract, but failing to allege that the broker was legally licensed as such, was subject to general demurrer, and the trial court erred in overruling the same.
Gardner, P. J., and Carlisle, J., concur.
Decided February 25, 1955.
Fraser & Shelfer, for plaintiff in error.
Wright, Oxford & Love, Clifford Oxford, contra.
Judgment reversed.