Case Name: WATKINS v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1911-03-15
Citations: 135 S.W. 568
Docket Number: 
Parties: WATKINS v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 135
Pages: 568–569

Head Matter:
WATKINS v. STATE.
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
March 15, 1911.)
Criminal Law (§ 1094*) — Appeal—Affirmance — Insufficient Record.
A conviction must be affirmed, where there is no motion for new trial or bill of exceptions in the record, and nothing in the record on which reversal is asked.
[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Dec. Dig. § 1094.*]
Appeal from District Court, El Paso County; James R. Harper, Judge.
Ed. Watkins, alias Ed. Liggins, was convicted of burglary, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Opinion:
DAVIDSON, P. J.
Appellant was convicted of burglary; his punishment being assessed at five years' confinement In the penitentiary.
The record is before us without a motion for new trial or bill of exceptions. There is nothing pointed out in the record upon which appellant bases a ground for reversal.
As the record is presented, the judgment is affirmed.