Case Name: ARMSTRONG v. ARMSTRONG
Court: Texas Courts of Civil Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1938-11-18
Citations: 121 S.W.2d 1025
Docket Number: No. 1854
Parties: ARMSTRONG v. ARMSTRONG.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 121
Pages: 1025–1025

Head Matter:
ARMSTRONG v. ARMSTRONG.
No. 1854.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Eastland.
Nov. 18, 1938.
E. A. Martin, of Longview, for appellant.
Sadler & Lattimore, of Longview, for appellee. • ■

Opinion:
GRISSOM, Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment granting appellee a divorce. The statement of facts and transcript were filed in the Court of Civil Appeals at Tex-arkana November 16, 1937. The case was transferred to this court by order of the' Supreme Court. The cause was submitted in this court September 30, 1938.
Appellant has failed to file assignments of errors and briefs as required by Court of Civil Appeals Rule 38. No effort to show good cause -for such failure has been made. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed by this court on its own motion. Court of Civil Appeals Rule 38; Du Bose v. Mercantile Bank & Trust Co. of Texas, Tex.Civ.App., 67 S.W.2d 1066; Harding v. Stith, Tex.Civ.App., 88 S.W.2d 528; Sisk v. Steves Sash & Door Co., Tex.Civ.App., 89 S.W.2d 788; Trustees of Dist. No. 26 v. County Board, etc., Tex.Civ.App., 89 S.W.2d 1041; Williamson v. Pulliam, Tex.Civ.App., 89 S.W.2d 799; Miller v. Banks, Tex.Civ.App., 276 S.W. 768; Tsutomu Dyo v. Smith, Tex.Civ.App., 249 S.W. 541; Prairie Oil & Gas Co. v. Curry, Tex.Civ.App., 251 S.W. 559; 3 Tex.Jur. 926.
The appeal is dismissed.