Case Name: DOMINICK A. D'ONOFRIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PHYLLIS D'ONOFRIO, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1976-10-14
Citations: 144 N.J. Super. 352
Docket Number: 
Parties: DOMINICK A. D’ONOFRIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PHYLLIS D’ONOFRIO, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 144
Pages: 352–353

Head Matter:
DOMINICK A. D’ONOFRIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PHYLLIS D’ONOFRIO, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued October 6, 1976
Decided October 14, 1976.
Before Judges Lora, Crane and Michels.
Mr. LeBoy D. Safro argued the cause for appellant.
Mr. George D. Rosenthal argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Rosenthal and Rubinowitz, attorneys; Mr. Jerome L. Rubinowitz on the brief).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We affirm substantially for the reasons expressed in the written, opinion of Judge Pressler, 144 N. J. Super. 200 (Ch. Div. 1976).