Case Name: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Shields et al., Appellants
Court: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1927-10-20
Citations: 91 Pa. Super. 484
Docket Number: Appeal No. 323
Parties: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Shields et al., Appellants.
Judges: Before Porter, P. J., Henderson, Trexler, Keller, Lcnn, Gawthrop and Cunningham, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania Superior Court Reports
Volume: 91
Pages: 484–485

Head Matter:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Shields et al., Appellants.
Argued October 4, 1927.
Before Porter, P. J., Henderson, Trexler, Keller, Lcnn, Gawthrop and Cunningham, JJ.
G. Harry Differ, and with him Gitas. J. Reilly, for appellants.
A. A. Vosburg, and with him John J. Owens and William K. Bastían, District Attorney, for appellee.
October 20, 1927:

Opinion:
Opinion by
Keller, J.,
The defendant Shields appeals from an order striking off a nolle prosequi entered by direction of the Court of Quarter Sessions after an appeal had been taken by the Commonwealth from the order directing its entry. See Com. v. Shields, 89 Pa. Superior Ct. 266. The appeal must he quashed as the order appealed from is interlocutory. The effect of such an order is very much like that ensuing on an order striking off judgment of non-suit in civil actions, which has been held not to be reviewable as error: Szmigel v. Director General, 266 Pa. 573; Heilman v. McKinstry, 18 Pa. Superior Ct. 70.
An appeal will not lie from the order complained of until a final judgment has been entered in the case: Com. v. Weber, 63 Pa. Superior Ct. 75.
Appeal quashed.