Case Name: SPENCER v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1913-05-21
Citations: 157 S.W. 479
Docket Number: 
Parties: SPENCER v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 157
Pages: 479–479

Head Matter:
SPENCER v. STATE.
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
May 21, 1913.)
Criminal Law (§ 1097 ) — Appeal—Record— Statement of Facts — Necessity.
The denial of a motion for a new trial on the ground that the verdict is contrary to the law and the evidence cannot be reviewed on appeal, in the absence of a statement of facts.
[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2862, 2864, 2926, 2934, 2938, 2939, 2941, 2942, 2947; Dec. Dig. § 1097. ]
Appeal from Criminal District Court, Dallas County; Robt. B. Seay, Judge.
Ed. Spencer was convicted of burglary, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
For other cases see same topic and section NUMBER in Dec. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key-No. Series & Rep’r Indexes

Opinion:
HARPER, J.
Appellant was convicted of burglary, and his punishment assessed at four years' confinement in the penitentiary.
The only ground in the motion for a new trial assigns that the verdict is contrary to the law and the evidence. No statement of facts accompanies the record; consequently we cannot review this ground.
The judgment is affirmed.