Case Name: Marka C. WARD, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2016-10-25
Citations: 502 S.W.3d 78
Docket Number: No. ED 103569
Parties: Marka C. WARD, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 502
Pages: 78–79

Head Matter:
Marka C. WARD, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 103569
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
FILED October 25, 2016
Timothy J. Forneris, Missouri Public Defender Office, St. Louis, MO, Attorney for Appellant
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Dora A. Fichter, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorney for Respondent
Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Marka C. Ward (Movant) appeals from the motion court's Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on Movant's Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence denying Movant's Rule 29,15 claims for post-conviction relief. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).