Case Name: S. Stroock & Co., Inc., Respondent, v. Joseph Lichtenthal, Inc., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1928-12
Citations: 225 A.D. 732
Docket Number: 
Parties: S. Stroock & Co., Inc., Respondent, v. Joseph Lichtenthal, Inc., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 225
Pages: 732–732

Head Matter:
S. Stroock & Co., Inc., Respondent, v. Joseph Lichtenthal, Inc., Appellant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We believe the defendant should be given an opportunity to frame his pleadings so as to present the alleged defenses and counterclaims set forth in the proposed amended answer. We do not, however, depart from our former opinion on the merits (224 App. Div. 19). The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion granted. Present — Dowling, P. J., Finch, McAvoy, Martin and O'Malley, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted.