Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alander L. JACOB, Defendan-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-12-10
Citations: 84 F. App'x 781
Docket Number: No. 03-30208; D.C. No. CR-98-00076-1-HA
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alander L. JACOB, Defendan-Appellant.
Judges: Before GOODWIN, WALLACE, and MCKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 84
Pages: 781–782

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alander L. JACOB, Defendan-Appellant.
No. 03-30208.
D.C. No. CR-98-00076-1-HA.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 8, 2003.
Decided Dec. 10, 2003.
J. Richard Scruggs, Esq., USPO — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Mark O. Hatfield U.S. Courthouse, Portland, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Alander L. Jacob, pro se, Federal Correctional Institution, Three Rivers, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before GOODWIN, WALLACE, and MCKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Alander L. Jacob appeals the district court's denial of his motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36. We have jurisdiction over this final judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and affirm the district court's order.
Because Mr. Jacob's claim was not the proper subject of a Rule 36 motion, the district court correctly determined that it lacked jurisdiction to resentence Mr-. Jacob. See United States v. Penna, 319 F.3d 509, 513 (9th Cir.2003); United States v. Kaye, 739 F.2d 488, 490 (9th Cir.1984).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.