Case Name: ELLIOT M. KATZ; In Defense of Animals, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. UNITED STATES of America; Corbin Lee, Major; Brian O'Neill; Steven Parker, Sergeant; Glynn C. Mallory, Jr., General, Defendants, and Donald Saucier, Private, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-08-23
Citations: 262 F.3d 897
Docket Number: No. 98-16298
Parties: ELLIOT M. KATZ; In Defense of Animals, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. UNITED STATES of America; Corbin Lee, Major; Brian O’Neill; Steven Parker, Sergeant; Glynn C. Mallory, Jr., General, Defendants, and Donald Saucier, Private, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: THOMPSON and GRABER, Circuit Judges, and CARROLL, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 262
Pages: 897–897

Head Matter:
ELLIOT M. KATZ; In Defense of Animals, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. UNITED STATES of America; Corbin Lee, Major; Brian O’Neill; Steven Parker, Sergeant; Glynn C. Mallory, Jr., General, Defendants, and Donald Saucier, Private, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 98-16298.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Filed Aug. 23, 2001
Before: THOMPSON and GRABER, Circuit Judges, and CARROLL, District Judge.
. The Honorable Earl H. Carroll, United States Senior District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
ORDER
By the mandate of the Supreme Court in Saucier v. Katz, 533 U.S.-, 121 S.Ct. 2151, 150 L.Ed.2d 272 (2001), the judgment of this court, 194 F.3d 962, is reversed. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court denying the defendant Saucier's motion for summary judgment is reversed, and the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court's opinion.