Case Name: Eyvonne ARTIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U.S. FOODS SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-02-09
Citations: 632 F. App'x 160
Docket Number: No. 15-1477
Parties: Eyvonne ARTIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U.S. FOODS SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before GREGORY, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 632
Pages: 160–161

Head Matter:
Eyvonne ARTIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U.S. FOODS SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 15-1477.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 30, 2015.
Decided: Feb. 9, 2016.
Eyvonne Artis, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Mary Costantino, Karla Grossenbacher, Seyfarth Shaw, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Before GREGORY, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Eyvonne Artis appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to U.S. Foods Service on her claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e to 2000e-17.. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Artis v. U.S. Foods Serv., No. 1:13-cv-02870-JKB (D.Md. Apr. 3, 2015). We deny Artis' motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court, and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.