Case Name: Malcom Maxwell RYIDU-X, a/k/a Richard Janey, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARYLAND DIVISION OF CORRECTION; Western Correctional Institution; John Doe, Inmate Commissary Supervisor; Maryland Correctional Institution-Hagerstown; Lee Ann Crawford, Office Secretary II; Maureen Reid, Case Management Supervisor; John Doe, Keefe employee who processes inmate requests; Tony Unknown, Inmate Commissary Supervisor for MCI-H; Keefe Commissary Network, LLC., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-11-20
Citations: 622 F. App'x 284
Docket Number: No. 15-7110
Parties: Malcom Maxwell RYIDU-X, a/k/a Richard Janey, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARYLAND DIVISION OF CORRECTION; Western Correctional Institution; John Doe, Inmate Commissary Supervisor; Maryland Correctional Institution-Hagerstown; Lee Ann Crawford, Office Secretary II; Maureen Reid, Case Management Supervisor; John Doe, Keefe employee who processes inmate requests; Tony Unknown, Inmate Commissary Supervisor for MCI-H; Keefe Commissary Network, LLC., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 622
Pages: 284–284

Head Matter:
Malcom Maxwell RYIDU-X, a/k/a Richard Janey, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARYLAND DIVISION OF CORRECTION; Western Correctional Institution; John Doe, Inmate Commissary Supervisor; Maryland Correctional Institution-Hagerstown; Lee Ann Crawford, Office Secretary II; Maureen Reid, Case Management Supervisor; John Doe, Keefe employee who processes inmate requests; Tony Unknown, Inmate Commissary Supervisor for MCI-H; Keefe Commissary Network, LLC., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15-7110.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 17, 2015.
Decided: Nov. 20, 2015.
Malcom Maxwell Ryidu-X, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Office of The Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Malcom Maxwell Ryidu-X seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing some, but not all, of his claims brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Ryidu-X seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny Ryidu-X's motion for preliminary injunction and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.