Case Name: Charles D. FREEMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-02-26
Citations: 594 So. 2d 834
Docket Number: No. 91-01722
Parties: Charles D. FREEMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: DANAHY, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and PARKER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 594
Pages: 834–835

Head Matter:
Charles D. FREEMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 91-01722.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Feb. 26, 1992.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Stephen Krosschell, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Davis G. Anderson, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the judgment and sentence. However, in our review of the record, we find no written order to conform to the trial court's oral pronouncement imposing a fee for the public defender service at the sentencing hearing. We, therefore, remand this case to the trial court to correct the judgment and sentence to conform with its oral pronouncement.
DANAHY, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and PARKER, JJ., concur.