Case Name: Mary Ann DUNOPE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARCELORMITTAL STEEL, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-04-28
Citations: 569 F. App'x 148
Docket Number: No. 13-2272
Parties: Mary Ann DUNOPE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARCELORMITTAL STEEL, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 569
Pages: 148–149

Head Matter:
Mary Ann DUNOPE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARCELORMITTAL STEEL, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 13-2272.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 24, 2014.
Decided: April 28, 2014.
Mary Ann Dunope, Appellant Pro Se. Raymond Charles Baldwin, Christine Mary Costantino, Seyfarth Shaw, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Bradley K. Shafer, Swartz Campbell, LLC, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Mary Ann Dunope appeals the district court's orders dismissing her complaint alleging employment discrimination claims under the ADA and ERISA violations and denying her motion to alter or amend the dismissal order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dunope v. Arcelor-Mittal S.A., No. 5:13-cv-00058-JPB-JES (N.D.W.Va. Aug. 14 & Sept. 19, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.