Case Name: David E. ROLAND, Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, State of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2016-03-15
Citations: 482 S.W.3d 881
Docket Number: No. ED 103137
Parties: David E. ROLAND, Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, State of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Roy L. Richter, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 482
Pages: 881–881

Head Matter:
David E. ROLAND, Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, State of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 103137
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
FILED: March 15, 2016
Attorney For Appellant: David Edward Roland, 14779 Audrain Road 815, Mexico, Missouri 65265.
Attorney For Respondent: Rachel M. Jones, Missouri Department of Revenue, P.O. Box 475, 301 W. High Street, Jefferson City,„MO 65105-0475.
Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Roy L. Richter, J.

Opinion:
. . ORDER
PER CURIAM'
David E, Roland (Driver) appeals from the trial court's judgment upholding the decision of the Director of Revenue of the State of Missouri to deny Driver's application for a new Missouri license, pursuant to Section 544.046 RSMo 2000. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case "would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision, We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
. Unless otherwise indicated, all further statutory references are to RSMo 2000 as amend-0>