Case Name: PODMORE, Appellant, v. BANK FOR SAVINGS, Respondent
Court: New York City Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1900-04-05
Citations: 63 N.Y.S. 1114
Docket Number: 
Parties: PODMORE, Appellant, v. BANK FOR SAVINGS, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 63
Pages: 1114–1114

Head Matter:
PODMORE, Appellant, v. BANK FOR SAVINGS, Respondent.
(City Court of New York, General Term.
April 5, 1900.)
Action by one Podmore, administrator, against the Bank for Savings. From an order requiring plaintiff to give security for costs, he appeals. Reversed. Michael Schapp and Edward Hymes, for appellant. Strong & for

Opinion:
HASCALL, J.
Before arguing this appeal upon its merits, a motion to dismiss the same was brought to the attention of the court upon general grounds, the principal one of which was alleged loches, and a subsidiary one of which appears to be indisposition of the respondent to accept inevitable results. That motion is denied. Under the decision of the appellate term in Pod-more v. Bank, 62 N. Y. Supp. 526, upon authority of Parsley v. Rodgers, 44 App. Div. 139, 61 N. Y. Supp. 1015, which of course bind us, the order appealed from cannot stand. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements of appeal. ;
McCARTHY, J., concurs.