Case Name: In re the Marriage of Norma Faye MONTENEGRO, Respondent, v. George E. MONTENEGRO, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-06-08
Citations: 14 S.W.3d 625
Docket Number: No. 73962
Parties: In re the Marriage of Norma Faye MONTENEGRO, Respondent, v. George E. MONTENEGRO, Appellant.
Judges: Before HOFF, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, and MARY RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 14
Pages: 625–625

Head Matter:
In re the Marriage of Norma Faye MONTENEGRO, Respondent, v. George E. MONTENEGRO, Appellant.
No. 73962.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
June 8, 1999.
Thomas E. Osterholt, Jr., Francis X. Neuner, Jr., Dankenbring, Greiman, Os-terholt & Hoffman, P.C., St. Louis, for appellant.
Karen S. Little, O’Fallon, for respondent.
Before HOFF, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, and MARY RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, George E. Montenegro ("husband"), appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, dissolving his marriage to respondent, Norma Faye Montenegro. Husband contends the court lacked personal jurisdiction over him. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcript and find the judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).