Case Name: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. CONOCO PLASTICS, a Division of Continental Oil Company (Formerly Monroe Manufacturing Company, a Division of Continental Oil Company), Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1970-10-27
Citations: 433 F.2d 985
Docket Number: No. 29669
Parties: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. CONOCO PLASTICS, a Division of Continental Oil Company (Formerly Monroe Manufacturing Company, a Division of Continental Oil Company), Respondent.
Judges: Before GEWIN, GOLDBERG and DYER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 433
Pages: 985–986

Head Matter:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. CONOCO PLASTICS, a Division of Continental Oil Company (Formerly Monroe Manufacturing Company, a Division of Continental Oil Company), Respondent.
No. 29669
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Oct. 27, 1970.
John J. A. Reynolds, Jr., Director, N. L. R. B., Memphis, Tenn., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D. C., Leonard M, Wagman, Robert E. Williams, Attys., N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
William J. Threadgill, Taylor B. Smith, Threadgill & Smith, Columbus, Miss., for respondent.
Before GEWIN, GOLDBERG and DYER, Circuit Judges.
Rule 18, 5th Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5th Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409 Part I.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The National Labor Relations Board here petitions for enforcement of a supplemental bargaining order issued against Conoco Plastics, a division of Continental Oil Company. After an evidentiary hearing conducted by a trial examiner, the Board found that Conoco had violated section 8(a) (1) and (5) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(a) (1), (5). It ordered the company to cease and desist from the unfair labor practice, to bargain collectively with the union which the Board had certified as the exclusive bargaining representative of Conoeo's over-the-road truckdrivers, and to post appropriate notices. 177 N.L.R.B. No. 124. Considering the record as a whole, we conclude that there was substantial evidence to support the Board's supplemental decision and bargaining order. See Home Town Foods, Inc. v. NLRB, 5 Cir. 1969, 416 F.2d 392, 394; NLRB v. Golden Age Beverage Co., 5 Cir. 1969, 415 F.2d 26, 29, 32. Therefore, the Board's supplemental order is
Enforced.
. In a previous action, this Court set aside a Board order issued against Monroe Manufacturing Company (now Conoco Plastics), a division of Continental Oil Company, and remanded the case to the Board for a hearing on certain issues. Monroe Mfg. Co., Div. of Continental Oil Co. v. NLRB, 5 Cir. 1968, 403 F.2d 197, setting aside 167 N.L.R.B. 1074. Subsequently the Board held a trial examiner's hearing on the merits and issued a supplemental decision and order. National Labor Relations Act § 10(b), (c), 29 U.S. C.A. § 160(b), (c).
. General Drivers, Salesmen and Ware-housemen's Local Union No. 984, an affiliate of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America.