Case Name: Stephanie L. NICKOLAN-BARRON, Appellant, v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2003-11-25
Citations: 859 So. 2d 594
Docket Number: No. 1D03-0660
Parties: Stephanie L. NICKOLAN-BARRON, Appellant, v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, Appellee.
Judges: BOOTH, BENTON and LEWIS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 859
Pages: 594–595

Head Matter:
Stephanie L. NICKOLAN-BARRON, Appellant, v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, Appellee.
No. 1D03-0660.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nov. 25, 2003.
Stephanie L. Nickolan-Barron, pro se, for Appellant.
John D. Maher, Deputy General Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We hold that appellant's facsimile transaction report, which indicates that appellant's fax, i.e., her notice of appeal, was successfully transmitted to the Office of Appeals at the Agency for Workforce Innovation within the applicable time frame, constituted sufficient evidence that appellant timely faxed her notice of appeal. See Reynolds v. SV Cent. Dania Props., Inc., 849 So.2d 1181, 1182-83 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Espanioly v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 768 So.2d 1230, 1230 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); cf. Mendelsohn v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 851 So.2d 208, 209 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). Accordingly, we reverse the Unemployment Appeals Commission's order affirming the appeals referee's determination that the appeal was untimely and remand for further proceedings.
REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.
BOOTH, BENTON and LEWIS, JJ., concur.