Case Name: Peter Hay, Resp't, v. Rosalie Muller, App'lt
Court: New York City Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1893
Citations: 56 N.Y. St. Rep. 902
Docket Number: 
Parties: Peter Hay, Resp’t, v. Rosalie Muller, App’lt.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 56
Pages: 902–903

Head Matter:
Peter Hay, Resp’t, v. Rosalie Muller, App’lt.
Appeal from judgment entered on verdict in favor of plaintiff.
F. J. Bischoff, for app’lt; Paul Wilcox, for resp’t.

Opinion:
Ehrlich, O. J.
The complaint sets forth a sufficient cause of action, and the proofs sufficiently established title in the plaintiff, value, demand, and re fusal, before suit brought, to send the case to the jury. They found on all the issues in favor of the plaintiff. No error was committed to the prejudice of the defendant. The case was fully tried, and intelligently submitted to the jury. The judgment must be affirmed, with costs.