Case Name: Nathaniel MORELAND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-12-05
Citations: 570 So. 2d 445
Docket Number: No. 89-0180
Parties: Nathaniel MORELAND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: HERSEY, C.J., and LETTS and DELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 570
Pages: 445–445

Head Matter:
Nathaniel MORELAND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 89-0180.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Dec. 5, 1990.
Harry G. Robbins, North Miami Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Lynn G. Waxman, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm. Appellant filed a motion for relief in the trial court pursuant to Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, which was dismissed because of the pend-ency of this appeal. Our affirmance is without prejudice to the filing of a renewed motion in the trial court for appropriate relief. See Dickerson v. State, 509 So.2d 1390 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).
HERSEY, C.J., and LETTS and DELL, JJ., concur.