Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marco ALCAZAR, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-11-16
Citations: 154 F. App'x 606
Docket Number: No. 04-50096
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Marco ALCAZAR, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 154
Pages: 606–607

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Marco ALCAZAR, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 04-50096.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 8, 2005.
Decided Nov. 16, 2005.
Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Marco Alcazar appeals the 121-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 and 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a).
Because appellant was sentenced under mandatory Sentencing Guidelines, we remand for further proceedings consistent with United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez, 419 F.3d 906, 916 (9th Cir.2005) (extending Ame line's limited remand procedure to cases involving non-constitutional error under United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005)).
REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.