Case Name: MYRTIE C. VAN KEUREN, ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM, PLAINTIFF, v. ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL., DEFENDANTS
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1931-11-09
Citations: 9 N.J. Misc. 1118
Docket Number: 
Parties: MYRTIE C. VAN KEUREN, ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM, PLAINTIFF, v. ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 9
Pages: 1118–1118

Head Matter:
MYRTIE C. VAN KEUREN, ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM, PLAINTIFF, v. ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
Argued October 6, 1931
Decided November 9, 1931.
Before Justices Tbenchaed, Daly and Donges.
Eor the application, Hobart & Minard.
Contra, Alexander Simpson.

Opinion:
Pee Ctjeiam.
Plaintiff has a verdict and defendants seek a rule to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside and a new trial granted.
Upon consideration of the matters presented, we conclude that the application for a rule to show cause should be denied.
The application is denied, with costs.