Case Name: Edward Harold SCHAD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles L. RYAN, Arizona Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-03-04
Citations: 709 F.3d 855
Docket Number: No. 07-99005
Parties: Edward Harold SCHAD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles L. RYAN, Arizona Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before: THOMAS, Circuit Judge and Capital Case Coordinator.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 709
Pages: 855–861

Head Matter:
Edward Harold SCHAD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles L. RYAN, Arizona Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 07-99005.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
March 4, 2013.
Kelley J. Henry, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender, Nashville, TN, Denise Irene Young, Den ise I. Young, Tucson, AZ, for Petitioner-Appellant.
Jon Anderson, Esquire, Assistant Attorney General, Arizona Attorney General’s Office, Phoenix, AZ, for Respondent-Appellee.
Before: THOMAS, Circuit Judge and Capital Case Coordinator.

Opinion:
AMENDED ORDER
The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc. Pursuant to the rules applicable to capital cases in which an execution date has been scheduled, a deadline was set by which any judge could request a vote on whether the panel's orders should be reheard en banc.
A judge requested a vote on whether to hear the panel's orders en banc, and a vote was conducted. A majority of the active, non-recused judges eligible to vote on the en banc call voted against rehearing the panel's orders en banc. Therefore, the petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED. No further petitions for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc will be entertained. En banc proceedings with respect to the orders are concluded. The panel will issue a separate order concerning the petition for panel rehearing.