Case Name: HARRY GOLDKLANG, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1974-10-22
Citations: 66 N.J. 7
Docket Number: 
Parties: HARRY GOLDKLANG, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 66
Pages: 7–7

Head Matter:
HARRY GOLDKLANG, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Argued October 8, 1974
Decided October 22, 1974.
Mr. James A. Robottom argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Haskins, Robottom and Hack, attorneys).
Mr. Samuel H. Davis argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Dubowsky and Davis, attorneys).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the majority of the Appellate Division.
Two members of the Court would reverse substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Meanor in his dissent reported at 130 N. J. Super. 307 (1974).
For affirmance — Chief Justice Hughes and Justices Jacobs, Sullivan and Pashman and Judge Conford — 5.
For reversal — Justices Hall and Clifford — 2.