Case Name: In re Lucy Mazurek PILCH, aka Lucy M. Mazurek, Debtor, Lucy Mazurek Pilch, aka Lucy M. Mazurek, Appellant, v. Rose E. Bareham Chapter 7 Trustee; Salomon Brothers Realty Corporation; Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-08-28
Citations: 332 F. App'x 314
Docket Number: No. 08-2066
Parties: In re Lucy Mazurek PILCH, aka Lucy M. Mazurek, Debtor, Lucy Mazurek Pilch, aka Lucy M. Mazurek, Appellant, v. Rose E. Bareham Chapter 7 Trustee; Salomon Brothers Realty Corporation; Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, Appellees.
Judges: Before MARTIN, RYAN, and SUTTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Bankruptcy Reporter
Volume: 417
Pages: 314–315

Head Matter:
In re Lucy Mazurek PILCH, aka Lucy M. Mazurek, Debtor, Lucy Mazurek Pilch, aka Lucy M. Mazurek, Appellant, v. Rose E. Bareham Chapter 7 Trustee; Salomon Brothers Realty Corporation; Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, Appellees.
No. 08-2066.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Aug. 28, 2009.
Cynthia Marie Law, Lansing, MI, for Appellant.
John J. Bursch, Stephen B. Grow, Nicole Lynn Mazzocco, Warner, Norcross & Judd, Grand Rapids, MI, Mark Edward Bredow, Potestivo & Associates, Rochester Hills, MI, Justin F. Carter, Potestivo & Associates, Grand Rapids, MI, for Appel-lees.
Before MARTIN, RYAN, and SUTTON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
RYAN, Circuit Judge.
Lucy Mazurek Pilch, aka Lucy M. Mazu-rek, a bankruptcy debtor and unsuccessful petitioner in a bankruptcy adversary proceeding, appealed the bankruptcy court's decision to the district court. The district court held: 1) it is without jurisdiction to entertain Pilch's appeal of the bankruptcy court's order overruling her objection to a creditor's amended proof of claim; and 2) the Trastee, Rose E. Bareham's compensation was not calculated improperly. We find no error in the district court's decision.
Moreover, the district court judge, Honorable Gordon J. Quist, prepared a well-reasoned opinion that thoroughly discusses and analyzes each issue presented to this court. Because we cannot improve upon the reasoning in Judge Quist's excellent opinion, we adopt his opinion as our own.
Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.