Case Name: W. J. CECIL, as Director of Agriculture, etc., Respondent, v. ERNEST GALLO et al., Appellants
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1943-02-15
Citations: 57 Cal. App. 2d 145
Docket Number: Civ. No. 6934
Parties: W. J. CECIL, as Director of Agriculture, etc., Respondent, v. ERNEST GALLO et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports, Second Series
Volume: 57
Pages: 145–146

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 6934.
Third Dist.
Feb. 15, 1943.]
W. J. CECIL, as Director of Agriculture, etc., Respondent, v. ERNEST GALLO et al., Appellants.
Edward T. Taylor for Appellants.
Earl Warren, Attorney General, Wm. T. Sweigert, Assistant Attorney General, W. R. Augustine, Deputy Attorney General, and Jefferson E. Peyser for Respondent.

Opinion:
THE COURT.
Respondent brings this cause before us by way of motion to dismiss the appeal taken by appellants from an order striking out certain portions of defendants' answer to plaintiffs' first amended complaint. The clerk's transcript does not disclose that a final judgment has been entered.
On previous occasions this court has had before it similar questions. See Jordan v. Associated Discount Corp., 10 Cal.App.2d 96 [51 P.2d 1108], and Couch v. McGregor, 19 Cal.App.2d 633 [66 P.2d 159]. We find nothing in the present case to take it out of the well established rule that no appeal lies from such order. (Tedford v. San Diego Electric Ry. Corp., 79 Cal.App. 505 [249 P. 1093]; § 963, Code Civ. Proc.)
Respondent's motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed.