Case Name: Charles CHATFIELD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-04-26
Citations: 814 So. 2d 1217
Docket Number: No. 1D00-4568
Parties: Charles CHATFIELD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ALLEN, C.J., MINER and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 814
Pages: 1217–1217

Head Matter:
Charles CHATFIELD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D00-4568.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
April 26, 2002.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; Glen P. Gifford, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; Bryan Jordan, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
On this direct appeal following resen-tencing pursuant to Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000), appellant argues that his primary offense of sexual battery on a child age twelve or older but less than eighteen by a familial custodian in violation of section 794.011(8)(b), Florida Statutes (1997), should have been scored as a Level 7, rather than a Level 9, offense. He alleges, further, that the error resulted in an improper departure sentence without written reasons. The state concedes that the outcome of this appeal is controlled by our recent decision in Holt v. State, 808 So.2d 290 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). Accordingly, as in Holt, we reverse and remand for resentencing scoring the primary offense as a Level 7 offense pursuant to the 1994 guidelines.
REVERSED and REMANDED, with directions.
ALLEN, C.J., MINER and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.