Case Name: NORMANDY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CITY OF PASADENA HILLS, et al., Defendants/Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-11-17
Citations: 979 S.W.2d 941
Docket Number: No. 73660
Parties: NORMANDY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CITY OF PASADENA HILLS, et al., Defendants/Respondents.
Judges: Before PAUL J. SIMON, P.J., and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 979
Pages: 941–941

Head Matter:
NORMANDY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CITY OF PASADENA HILLS, et al., Defendants/Respondents.
No. 73660.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Nov. 17, 1998.
Darold E. Crotzer, Jr., Charles L. Ford, Sandra A. Padgett, Crotzer and Ford, Clayton, for appellant.
Kevin M. O’Keefe, Corinne N. Darvish, Uthoff, Graeber, Bobinette & O’Keefe, St. Louis, for respondents.
Before PAUL J. SIMON, P.J., and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Normandy School District (Normandy) appeals from a judgment entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County dismissing its petition for declaratory judgment against the City of Pasadena Hills, J. Scott Livingston, the city's mayor, and Lesa Meierotto, Ley-land Thomas, Jeannine Bennet, and James Floyd, members of the city's Board of Aider-men (collectively City). We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that no error of law appears. Because an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum solely for the use of the parties involved has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.