Case Name: Albert Reitman, Respondent, v. Morris Neulander, Impleaded, etc., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1899-10
Citations: 29 Misc. 753
Docket Number: 
Parties: Albert Reitman, Respondent, v. Morris Neulander, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 29
Pages: 753–753

Head Matter:
Albert Reitman, Respondent, v. Morris Neulander, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment, in favor of the plaintiff, rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of Eew York, fourth district, borough of Manhattan.
Henry L. Franklin, for appellant.
Eo appearance for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Guriam.
The record in this case, as in that of Reitman v. Neulander, 29 Misc. Rep. 752, shows that the defendant Eeulander, who alone appeals, is a resident of the county of Kings. The Municipal Court, fourth district, borough of Manhattan, was, therefore, without jurisdiction of the person of the defendant, and the judgment must, consequently, be reversed. Tyroler v. Gummersbach, 28 Misc. Rep. 151; Semmer Glass Co. v. Nassau Show Case Co., Id. 577.
Present: Freedman, P. J.; MaoLean and Leventritt, JJ.
Judgment reversed, with costs to appellant.