Case Name: Paul CASTILLO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1968-11-27
Citations: 216 So. 2d 38
Docket Number: No. 68-231
Parties: Paul CASTILLO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: LILES, C. J., and PIERCE and HOB-SON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 216
Pages: 38–39

Head Matter:
Paul CASTILLO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 68-231.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.
Nov. 27, 1968.
Milton E. Grusmark and Natalie Baskin, Miami Beach, for appellant.
Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert R. Crittenden, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Affirmed.
LILES, C. J., and PIERCE and HOB-SON, JJ., concur.