Case Name: Natalie Groeger et al., Appellants, v. Mifleb Realty Corp., Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1959-10-13
Citations: 9 A.D.2d 684
Docket Number: 
Parties: Natalie Groeger et al., Appellants, v. Mifleb Realty Corp., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 9
Pages: 684–684

Head Matter:
Natalie Groeger et al., Appellants, v. Mifleb Realty Corp., Respondent.

Opinion:
Appeal from an order denying an application for a preference under rule 9 of the Kings County Supreme Court Rules, unless appellant Natalie Groeger consent within a stated time to an examination by a physician designated by the court, in which event the application would be held in abeyance. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. On the basis of the medical proof submitted on the application, a denial of a preference was warranted. In the circumstances, the conditional order appealed from was within the bounds of the court's discretion. (Cf. Cunningham v. Malbin, 8 A D 2d 949.) Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ., concur.