Case Name: James Anthony PRIMUS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bryan STIRLING, SCDC Director; Tiffany N. Richardson, ODC, Defendants-Appellees, and Mr. William Byars, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-09-26
Citations: 583 F. App'x 250
Docket Number: No. 14-7163
Parties: James Anthony PRIMUS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bryan STIRLING, SCDC Director; Tiffany N. Richardson, ODC, Defendants-Appellees, and Mr. William Byars, Defendant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 583
Pages: 250–251

Head Matter:
James Anthony PRIMUS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bryan STIRLING, SCDC Director; Tiffany N. Richardson, ODC, Defendants-Appellees, and Mr. William Byars, Defendant.
No. 14-7163.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 23, 2014.
Decided: Sept. 26, 2014.
James Anthony Primus, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James Anthony Primus appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Primus' motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pri mus v. Stirling, No. 4:13-cv-00768-JFA (D.S.C. July 29, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.