Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jorge Luis ACOSTA-HERNANDEZ, also known as Juan Quintana, also known as Juan Carlos Quintana, also known as Juan Martinez, also known as Juan Beltran, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-10-25
Citations: 252 F. App'x 617
Docket Number: No. 06-51543
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jorge Luis ACOSTA-HERNANDEZ, also known as Juan Quintana, also known as Juan Carlos Quintana, also known as Juan Martinez, also known as Juan Beltran, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 252
Pages: 617–618

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jorge Luis ACOSTA-HERNANDEZ, also known as Juan Quintana, also known as Juan Carlos Quintana, also known as Juan Martinez, also known as Juan Beltran, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-51543
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Oct. 25, 2007.
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Jorge Luis Acosta-Hernandez, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jorge Luis Acosta-Hernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Acosta-Hernandez has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel's brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cm. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.