Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tecarlos Derille SMITH, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-09-16
Citations: 332 F. App'x 856
Docket Number: No. 09-7277
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tecarlos Derille SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 332
Pages: 856–857

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tecarlos Derille SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-7277.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 10, 2009.
Decided: Sept. 16, 2009.
Tecarlos Derille Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Tecarlos Derille Smith appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Smith, No. 7:04-cr-00040-FL-1 (E.D.N.C. July 1, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.