Case Name: Ronald L. KRETTLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-12-14
Citations: 151 S.W.3d 379
Docket Number: No. ED 83857
Parties: Ronald L. KRETTLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 151
Pages: 379–380

Head Matter:
Ronald L. KRETTLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 83857.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Dec. 14, 2004.
Maleaner Harvey, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Leslie E. McNamara, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Ronald L. Krettler appeals the judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. He contends the trial court lacked jurisdiction to accept his guilty plea because he properly invoked the Uniform Mandatory Disposition of De-tainers Law (UMDDL), sections 217.450-217.485, RSMo 2000, and the State failed to bring the criminal charge against him to trial within the statutory time limit.
Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).