Case Name: D. Edmonds, R. B. Edwards, and R. D. Kelly, in behalf of themselves, etc. v. Town of Haskell, Oklahoma, F. N. Shoemaker, as Town Clerk, etc., et al.
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1926-12-13
Citations: 273 U.S. 647
Docket Number: No. 500
Parties: D. Edmonds, R. B. Edwards, and R. D. Kelly, in behalf of themselves, etc. v. Town of Haskell, Oklahoma, F. N. Shoemaker, as Town Clerk, etc., et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 273
Pages: 647–648

Head Matter:
No. 500.
D. Edmonds, R. B. Edwards, and R. D. Kelly, in behalf of themselves, etc. v. Town of Haskell, Oklahoma, F. N. Shoemaker, as Town Clerk, etc., et al.
Motion to dismiss or affirm sub mitted December 6, 1926.
Decided December 13, 1926.
Messrs. Almond B. Cochran, R. C. Allen, and I. J. Underwood for defendants in error, in support of the motion.
Mr. Charles A. Moon for plaintiffs in error, in opposition thereto.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction on the authority of Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U. S. 300, 303; Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 256, 257; Farson, Son and Co. v. Bird, 248 U. S. 268, 271.