Case Name: Terrick M. CROSBY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2005-09-28
Citations: 911 So. 2d 258
Docket Number: No. 3D05-1688
Parties: Terrick M. CROSBY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before LEVY, GERSTEN, and SUAREZ, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 911
Pages: 258–259

Head Matter:
Terrick M. CROSBY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D05-1688.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Sept. 28, 2005.
Terrick M. Crosby, in proper person.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, for appellee.
Before LEVY, GERSTEN, and SUAREZ, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal of an Order summarily denying a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). This Court must reverse any Order summarily denied unless the postconviction Record, see Fla. RApp. P. 9.141(b)(2)(A), conclusively establishes that the appellant is not entitled to relief. See id.; see also Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D).
Because the Record before us fails to make the required showing, we reverse the Order on appeal and remand for an evi-dentiary hearing, or for the attachment of Record excerpts conclusively showing that the appellant is not entitled to relief. See id.; see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(d).
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.