Case Name: William Yoost, Respondent, v. John Farr, Jr., et al., Individually and as Copartners under the Firm Name of Farr & Co., Appellants
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1935-02-26
Citations: 266 N.Y. 576
Docket Number: 
Parties: William Yoost, Respondent, v. John Farr, Jr., et al., Individually and as Copartners under the Firm Name of Farr & Co., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 266
Pages: 576–577

Head Matter:
William Yoost, Respondent, v. John Farr, Jr., et al., Individually and as Copartners under the Firm Name of Farr & Co., Appellants.
(Argued January 17, 1935;
decided February 26, 1935.)
W. Montague Geer, Jr., William J. Donovan, George S. Leisure and Carl E. Newton for appellants.
I. Maurice Wormser and Nicholas Howard Pinto for respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed, with costs. Held, that the case was submitted to the jury on the theory on which it was tried. No opinion. (See 266 N. Y. 666.)
Concur: Lehman, O'Brien, Hubbs and Loughran, JJ. Dissenting: Crane, Ch. J., and Crouch, J. Not sitting: Finch, J.