Case Name: Commonwealth v. Jones, Appellant
Court: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1968-03-21
Citations: 212 Pa. Super. Ct. 173
Docket Number: Appeals, Nos. 251 to 258
Parties: Commonwealth v. Jones, Appellant.
Judges: Before Wright, P. J., Watkins, Montgomery, Jacobs, Hoffman, Spaulding, and Hannum, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania Superior Court Reports
Volume: 212
Pages: 173–174

Head Matter:
Commonwealth v. Jones, Appellant.
Argued March 21, 1968.
Before Wright, P. J., Watkins, Montgomery, Jacobs, Hoffman, Spaulding, and Hannum, JJ.
John J. Cannon, for appellant.
Vram Redurian, Jr., Assistant District Attorney, with him Ralph B. D’lorio, Assistant District Attorney, William R. Toal, First Assistant District Attorney, and Stephen J. McEwen, Jr., District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.
March 21, 1968:

Opinion:
Opinion
Per Curiam,
In the instant case, our Court granted leave to file this appeal nunc pro tunc. It appears, however, that post-trial motions have not been filed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Commonwealth v. Grillo, 208 Pa. Superior Ct. 444, 222 A. 2d 427 (1966). Accordingly, this case is remanded to the lower court to allow appellant to file post-trial motions nunc pro tunc. Should the said post-trial motions be dismissed, appellant shall have the right to appeal nunc pro tunc.