Case Name: R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Appellant, v. Sherri HUBBIRD, etc., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2016-06-01
Citations: 194 So. 3d 502
Docket Number: No. 3D14-3090
Parties: R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Appellant, v. Sherri HUBBIRD, etc., Appellee.
Judges: Before WELLS, SALTER and SCALES, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 194
Pages: 502–503

Head Matter:
R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Appellant, v. Sherri HUBBIRD, etc., Appellee.
No. 3D14-3090.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
June 1, 2016.
King & Spalding and William L. Durham II and Chad A. Peterson, Atlanta, GA, and Scott Michael Edson and Jeffrey S. Bucholtz, Washington, D.C., for appellant.
The Ferraro Law Firm and James L. Ferraro, Juan P. Bauta II, Paulo R. Lima and Allan B. Kaiser, for appellee.
Before WELLS, SALTER and SCALES, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. BMW of N. Am. v. Gore, 517 U.S. 559, 116 S.Ct. 1589, 134 L.Ed.2d 809 (1996); Soffer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 187 So.3d 1219 (Fla.2016).