Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel NICHERIE, aka Seal A, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-09-07
Citations: 395 F. App'x 338
Docket Number: No. 09-50305
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Daniel NICHERIE, aka Seal A, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, O’SCANNLAIN and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 395
Pages: 338–338

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Daniel NICHERIE, aka Seal A, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 09-50305.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 30, 2010.
Filed Sept. 7, 2010.
Jason Paul Gonzalez, Assistant U.S., Michael J. Raphael, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Kenneth M. Stern, Esquire, Law Offices of Kenneth M. Stern, Woodland Hills, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, O’SCANNLAIN and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
The district court never issued a ruling on Nicherie's request for the funds held in the attorney client trust accounts and the bail bond. Until it does, the matter is still pending before the district court and we have no jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (granting "jurisdiction of appeals from all final decisions of the district courts"); Jacobsen v. U.S. Postal Serv., 993 F.2d 649, 662 (9th Cir.1992).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.