Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Erik REDEEMER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-03-17
Citations: 319 F. App'x 809
Docket Number: No. 07-15837
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Erik REDEEMER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before BARKETT and FAY, Circuit Judges, and TRAGER, District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 319
Pages: 809–810

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Erik REDEEMER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-15837
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
March 17, 2009.
Richard F. Della Fera, Entin & Della Fera, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Laura Thomas Rivero, Anne R. Schultz, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Carol E. Herman, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Before BARKETT and FAY, Circuit Judges, and TRAGER, District Judge.
Honorable David G. Trager, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
At the oral argument session, Erik Redeemer, through counsel, stipulated that he has abandoned and waived any argument regarding whether there was sufficient evidence for a reasonable factfinder to conclude that he either actually or constructively possessed a firearm as a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). Accordingly, his conviction is affirmed.
As to sentencing, the government concedes that the crime of carrying a concealed weapon is not a "violent felony" for purposes of the Armed Career Criminal Act ("ACCA"), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). Thus, the only remaining issue is whether Redeemer's felony conviction for a violation of Tennessee's escape statute, T.C.A. § 39-16-605 (1993), qualifies as a "violent felony" for purposes of the ACCA. The parties have stipulated that in order to address this issue it is appropriate to remand this case to the district court for further fact finding regarding the circumstances of Redeemer's escape conviction, in light of Chambers v. United States, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 687, 172 L.Ed.2d 484 (2009). Accordingly, we vacate Redeemer's sentence and remand for further proceedings.
AFFIRMED in part; VACATED and REMANDED in part.