Case Name: Overbagh et al. v. Patrie
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1852-10
Citations: 6 N.Y. 510
Docket Number: 
Parties: *Overbagh et al. v. Patrie.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 6
Pages: 467–467

Head Matter:
*Overbagh et al. v. Patrie.
Appeal from the general term of the Supreme Court, in the third district, where a verdict in favor of the plaintiff had been set aside, and a new trial granted. (Reported below, 8 Barb. 28.)
This was an ejectment for a farm in Coeymans, in the county of Albany, which the plaintiffs claimed in fee. The question presented was the same as that decided in De Peyster v. Michael. There was a verdict, at the circuit, in favor of the plaintiffs, which was set aside by the court at general term, on a motion for a new trial; whereupon, the plaintiffs appealed to this court.
Stevens, for the plaintiff.
Taber, for the defendant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
— Judgment affirmed, for the reasons given in De Peyster v. Michael.