Case Name: Henry William TELLES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF STANISLAUS; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-10-06
Citations: 669 F. App'x 471
Docket Number: No. 14-15032
Parties: Henry William TELLES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF STANISLAUS; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 669
Pages: 471–472

Head Matter:
Henry William TELLES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF STANISLAUS; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 14-15032
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted September 27, 2016
Filed October 06, 2016
Henry William Telles, Pro Se
Eric Daniel Farrar, Law Offices of Daniel Farrar, Turlock, CA, for Defendant-Appellee
Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument, See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Henry William Telles appeals pro se from the district court's judgment follow ing a jury trial in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging Fourth Amendment violations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
We cannot review any of Telles' contentions challenging his jury trial because Telles has failed to provide the relevant pre-trial and trial transcripts required to review the alleged errors. See Fed. R. App. P. 10(b)(2); Syncom Capital Corp. v. Wade, 924 F.2d 167, 169-70 (9th Cir. 1991) (dismissing appeal by pro se appellant for failure to provide trial transcripts).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.