Case Name: Jacqueline YATES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WAL-MART STORES, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-11-15
Citations: 112 F. App'x 318
Docket Number: No. 04-1727
Parties: Jacqueline YATES, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. WAL-MART STORES, INCORPORATED, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 112
Pages: 318–319

Head Matter:
Jacqueline YATES, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. WAL-MART STORES, INCORPORATED, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 04-1727.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 18, 2004.
Decided Nov. 15, 2004.
Stephen A. Markey, III, Amy M. Kusk, the Law Offices of Stephen A. Markey, III, P.C., Towson, Maryland, for Appellant. Christopher R. Dunn, Decaro, Do-ran, Siciliano, Gallagher & Deblasis, LLP, Lanham, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Jacqueline Yates appeals the district court's orders granting summary judgment to Defendant in this personal injury action and denying Yates' motion to alter or amend the judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Yates v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., No. CA-03-2804-AMD (D. Md. May 11 & May 18, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED