Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David SERVIN-TERRASAS, a/k/a David Servin, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-12-18
Citations: 624 F. App'x 130
Docket Number: No. 15-7169
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David SERVIN-TERRASAS, a/k/a David Servin, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before GREGORY and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 624
Pages: 130–131

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David SERVIN-TERRASAS, a/k/a David Servin, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-7169.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 15, 2015.
Decided: Dec. 18, 2015.
David Servin-Terrasas, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Andrew Bassford, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before GREGORY and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
David Servin-Terrasas appeals the district court's orders denying his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012), and denying his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See United States v. Mann, 709 F.3d 301, 304-05 (4th Cir.2013) (reviewing the disposition of a § 3582(c)(2) motion for an abuse of discretion); United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir.2010) (holding that the district court does not have authority to reconsider a prior order for a § 3582(c)(2) motion). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's denial of relief. United States v. Servin-Terrasas, No. 4:06-cr-00004-JLK-1 (WD.Va. Mar. 23 and May 5, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Servin-Terrasas' motion to reconsider was also a motion for downward departure.