Case Name: Fowler v. Menard, Inc
Court: Michigan Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Michigan
Decision Date: 2016-04-29
Citations: 499 Mich. 908
Docket Number: No. 152519; Court of Appeals No. 310890
Parties: Fowler v Menard, Inc,
Judges: 
Reporter: Michigan Reports
Volume: 499
Pages: 908–908

Head Matter:
Order Granting Oral Argument in Case Pending on Application for Leave to Appeal Entered April 29, 2016:
Fowler v Menard, Inc,
No. 152519; Court of Appeals No. 310890.

Opinion:
The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order including, among the issues to be briefed, whether the crosswalk installed by the defendant had a special aspect that could create liability for even an open and obvious hazard, and whether such a special aspect can exist if the condition is not unreasonably dangerous. See Hoffner v Lanctoe, 492 Mich 450, 455 (2012); Lugo v Ameritech Corp, Inc, 464 Mich 512, 517 (2001). The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.