Case Name: Kevin C. McKINNEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-09-18
Citations: 384 S.W.3d 344
Docket Number: No. ED 98344
Parties: Kevin C. McKINNEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., KURT S. ODENWALD, J., and LISA VAN AMBURG, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 384
Pages: 344–345

Head Matter:
Kevin C. McKINNEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 98344.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Sept. 18, 2012.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 23, 2012.
Application for Transfer Denied Dec. 18, 2012.
Kevin C. McKinney, East St. Louis, IL, pro se, for appellant.
Jennifer A. Wideman, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., KURT S. ODENWALD, J., and LISA VAN AMBURG, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Kevin McKinney (Movant) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County dismissing his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief and denying his request for an evidentiary hearing. Mov-ant asserts that the motion court clearly erred in dismissing his claims on the grounds that his motion was: (1) untimely, and (2) not cognizable because he had not been delivered to the Missouri Department of Corrections (DOC).
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court's decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).