Case Name: UNITED STATES of America v. Harold KONIGSBERG, Anthony Stassi, Joseph Lucignano, Edward Skowron, Armand Colianni, Alias Artie Colianni, Ignazio Denaro, Alias Ignatius Denaro, Alias Mr. Ignatius, Angelo Bruno Annaloro, Alias Angelo Bruno, Alias A. B. Joseph Lucignano, Appellant; UNITED STATES of America v. Harold KONIGSBERG, Anthony Stassi, Joseph Lucignano, Edward Skowron, Armand Colianni, Alias Artie Colianni, Ignazio Denaro, Alias Ignatius Denaro, Alias Mr. Ignatius, Angelo Bruno Annaloro, Alias Angelo Bruno, Alias A. B. Edward Skowron, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1966-01-27
Citations: 354 F.2d 1007
Docket Number: Nos. 15224, 15225
Parties: UNITED STATES of America v. Harold KONIGSBERG, Anthony Stassi, Joseph Lucignano, Edward Skowron, Armand Colianni, Alias Artie Colianni, Ignazio Denaro, Alias Ignatius Denaro, Alias Mr. Ignatius, Angelo Bruno Annaloro, Alias Angelo Bruno, Alias A. B. Joseph Lucignano, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America v. Harold KONIGSBERG, Anthony Stassi, Joseph Lucignano, Edward Skowron, Armand Colianni, Alias Artie Colianni, Ignazio Denaro, Alias Ignatius Denaro, Alias Mr. Ignatius, Angelo Bruno Annaloro, Alias Angelo Bruno, Alias A. B. Edward Skowron, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 354
Pages: 1007–1007

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America v. Harold KONIGSBERG, Anthony Stassi, Joseph Lucignano, Edward Skowron, Armand Colianni, Alias Artie Colianni, Ignazio Denaro, Alias Ignatius Denaro, Alias Mr. Ignatius, Angelo Bruno Annaloro, Alias Angelo Bruno, Alias A. B. Joseph Lucignano, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America v. Harold KONIGSBERG, Anthony Stassi, Joseph Lucignano, Edward Skowron, Armand Colianni, Alias Artie Colianni, Ignazio Denaro, Alias Ignatius Denaro, Alias Mr. Ignatius, Angelo Bruno Annaloro, Alias Angelo Bruno, Alias A. B. Edward Skowron, Appellant.
Nos. 15224, 15225.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued Oct. 4,1965.
Decided Jan. 27, 1966.
Michael A. Querques, and Daniel E. Isles, Orange, N. J., for appellants.
J. Shane Creamer, First Asst. U. S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., Drew J. T. O’Keefe, U. S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee.
Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and MARIS and STALEY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have examined carefully each point raised by the defendants-appellants and the testimony given before the grand jury by Zavod and Kaplan has been read and weighed in the light of the record of the trial. See United States v. Boyance, 329 F.2d 372 (3 Cir. 1964) and United States v. Bertucci, 333 F.2d 292 (3 Cir. 1964). We find no error in the proceedings in the court below. Consequently the judgments of conviction will be affirmed.