Case Name: Patrick OKOEGWALE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Miles E. LONG, Warden; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-02-21
Citations: 31 F. App'x 418
Docket Number: No. 01-15923; D.C. No. CV-99-01730-KJD/LRL
Parties: Patrick OKOEGWALE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Miles E. LONG, Warden; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 31
Pages: 418–418

Head Matter:
Patrick OKOEGWALE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Miles E. LONG, Warden; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
No. 01-15923. D.C. No. CV-99-01730-KJD/LRL.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 11, 2002.
Decided Feb. 21, 2002.
Before B. FLETCHER, T.G. NELSON, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Patrick Okoegwale appeals pro se the district court's Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal of his action under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12112 ("ADA"), alleging that he was discharged due to his diabetes. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Zimmerman v. City of Oakland, 255 F.3d 734, 737 (9th Cir.2001), and affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Okoegwale's ADA claim because he failed to exhaust his administrative remedies before filing this action in district court. See Santa Maria v. Pac. Bell, 202 F.3d 1170, 1176 (9th Cir.2000).
Okoegwale's remaining contentions lack merit.
Appellee Thompson's request for attorneys fees and costs is denied without prejudice to filing a separate motion. See Fed. R.App. P. 38; 9th Cir. R. 39-1.6.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.