Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roy G. DRISCOLL, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-06-20
Citations: 233 F. App'x 388
Docket Number: No. 06-10876
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roy G. DRISCOLL, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 233
Pages: 388–388

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roy G. DRISCOLL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-10876
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
June 20, 2007.
Richard Bratton Roper, III, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Jason Douglas Hawkins, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Roy G. Driscoll has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Driscoll has filed a response. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Driscoll's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. See United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir.2006). Our independent review of the record, counsel's brief, and Driscoll's response discloses no non-frivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.