Case Name: Mark HAYES, Claimant/Appellant, v. MCDONNELL DOUGLAS CORP., Employer/Respondent, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2010-10-19
Citations: 323 S.W.3d 97
Docket Number: No. ED 94602
Parties: Mark HAYES, Claimant/Appellant, v. MCDONNELL DOUGLAS CORP., Employer/Respondent, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent.
Judges: Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 323
Pages: 97–97

Head Matter:
Mark HAYES, Claimant/Appellant, v. MCDONNELL DOUGLAS CORP., Employer/Respondent, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent.
No. ED 94602.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Oct. 19, 2010.
Mark Hayes, St. Louis, MO, Acting pro se.
Robert G. Pennell, Manchester, MO, for Employer/Respondent.
Bart A. Matanic, Division of Employment Security, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Mark Hayes (Claimant) appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's (Commission) decision finding that he was disqualified from unemployment benefits. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the Commission's decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence. Section 288.210 RSMo 2006. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).