Case Name: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ARTURO R. WHYTE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT; STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. FITZ G. BYFIELD, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT; STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BARRINGTON AIRD, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1993-08-02
Citations: 133 N.J. 481
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ARTURO R. WHYTE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. FITZ G. BYFIELD, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BARRINGTON AIRD, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 133
Pages: 481–482

Head Matter:
628 A.2d 287
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ARTURO R. WHYTE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. FITZ G. BYFIELD, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BARRINGTON AIRD, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Argued May 4, 1993
Decided August 2, 1993.
Joshua P. Cohn, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant (John J. Fahy, Bergen County Prosecutor, attorney).
Michael Chazen, Designated Counsel, argued the cause for respondent Arturo R. Whyte (Zulima V. Farber, Public Defender, attorney).
Terry Shaw, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for respondent Fitz G. Byfield (Zulima V. Farber, Public Defender, attorney).
James W. Donnelly, Designated Counsel, argued the cause for respondent Barrington Aird (Zulima V. Farber, Public Defender, attorney).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 265 N.J.Super. 518, 628 A.2d 340 (1992).