Case Name: Eddie BURGESS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-09-20
Citations: 660 So. 2d 415
Docket Number: No. 95-2427
Parties: Eddie BURGESS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: GUNTHER, C.J., and DELL and KLEIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 660
Pages: 415–415

Head Matter:
Eddie BURGESS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 95-2427.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Sept. 20, 1995.
Eddie Burgess, Raiford, pro se appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Joan Fowler, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appel-lee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Because of the recent decision in State v. Callaway, 658 So.2d 983 (Fla.1995), which was published after the trial court's denial of defendant's untimely rule 3.850 motion, the state concedes that defendant is now entitled to have the motion granted so that he can be resenteneed in accordance with Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 278, 130 L.Ed.2d 195 (1994) (consecutive habitual felony offender sentences for multiple offenses arising out of the same criminal episode are not authorized by statute).
Reversed.
GUNTHER, C.J., and DELL and KLEIN, JJ., concur.