Case Name: The State ex rel. Mirlisena v. Hamilton County Board of Elections
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1993-09-14
Citations: 67 Ohio St. 3d 445
Docket Number: No. 93-1435
Parties: The State ex rel. Mirlisena v. Hamilton County Board of Elections.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Wright, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 67
Pages: 445–449

Head Matter:
The State ex rel. Mirlisena v. Hamilton County Board of Elections.
[Cite as State ex rel. Mirlisena v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Elections (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 445.]
(No. 93-1435
Submitted September 13, 1993
Decided September 14, 1993.)

Opinion:
This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration of relator's request for oral argument and the motion of Hamilton County Conservative Forum for leave to file brief amicus curiae,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the request for oral argument be, and the same is hereby, denied.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the motion for leave to file brief amicus curiae be, and the same is hereby, granted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that a writ be, and the same is hereby, denied, consistent with the opinion to follow.
Moyer, C.J., Wright, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur.
A.W. Sweeney, Douglas and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.