Case Name: Donna L. CRENSHAW, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-10-13
Citations: 661 So. 2d 400
Docket Number: No. 94-2909
Parties: Donna L. CRENSHAW, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: PETERSON, C.J., and SHARP, W., J., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 661
Pages: 400–401

Head Matter:
Donna L. CRENSHAW, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 94-2909.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Oct. 13, 1995.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Daisy G. Clements, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Steven J. Guardiano, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

Opinion:
COBB, Judge.
After careful review, this court finds the appellant's initial argument, that the trial court erred when sentencing on Case Numbers 93-2915 and 94-1338 because it failed to utilize a single guidelines score-sheet for both offenses, to be without merit. Wood v. State, 655 So.2d 212 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (utilizing 1994 scoresheet for new substantive offense and 1993 scoresheet for prior forgery offense where probation had been revoked). See also Heath v. State, 656 So.2d 527 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (trial court did not err when it used two guideline scoresheets, one for offenses committed in 1993, and an other for offenses committed in 1994). § 921.001(4)(b)l., 2., Fla.Stat. (Supp.1994).
We agree, however, that the 1994 score-sheet was not as comprehensive as is contemplated by Rule 3.702(d)(1), Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure. As such, the sentence in Case Number 94-1338 is reversed and remanded for a corrected scoresheet and re-sentencing.
•REVERSED AND REMANDED.
PETERSON, C.J., and SHARP, W., J., concur.