Case Name: Marvin FACTOR and Kathleen Factor, Petitioners, v. BICYCLE TECHNOLOGY INC., Specialized Bicycle Components and Shimano Industrial Co., Ltd. v. GIANT MANUFACTURING CO., Respondent, and City of Philadelphia
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1997-04-16
Citations: 547 Pa. 459
Docket Number: Petition No. 665 E.D. Alloc. Dkt. 1996
Parties: Marvin FACTOR and Kathleen Factor, Petitioners, v. BICYCLE TECHNOLOGY INC., Specialized Bicycle Components and Shimano Industrial Co., Ltd. v. GIANT MANUFACTURING CO., Respondent, and City of Philadelphia.
Judges: 
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 547
Pages: 459–459

Head Matter:
691 A.2d 459
Marvin FACTOR and Kathleen Factor, Petitioners, v. BICYCLE TECHNOLOGY INC., Specialized Bicycle Components and Shimano Industrial Co., Ltd. v. GIANT MANUFACTURING CO., Respondent, and City of Philadelphia.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
April 16, 1997.
David F. Binder, Philadelphia, for Petitioner.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 16th day of April, 1997, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to whether the trial court erred by refusing to strike the testimony of respondent's expert witness. This case is to be scheduled for oral argument.