Case Name: W. Howard Bronsdon, respondent, v. William F. Shupe, appellant
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1926-02-01
Citations: 99 N.J. Eq. 449
Docket Number: 
Parties: W. Howard Bronsdon, respondent, v. William F. Shupe, appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 99
Pages: 449–449

Head Matter:
W. Howard Bronsdon, respondent, v. William F. Shupe, appellant.
[Decided February 1st, 1926.]
Mr. Lichtenstein & Lichtenstein, for the respondent.
Mr. Harry Augenbliclc, for the appellant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will he affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Griffin.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Teenchaed, Pakkee, Mintubn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gaednee, Van Buskibk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.