Case Name: George WICKER, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1983-10-28
Citations: 445 So. 2d 583
Docket Number: No. 83-272
Parties: George WICKER, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: BOARDMAN and SCHEB, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 445
Pages: 583–585

Head Matter:
George WICKER, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 83-272.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Oct. 28, 1983.
Rehearing En Banc Denied Feb. 15, 1984.
Jerry Hill, Public Defender, Bartow, and Deborah K. Brueckheimer, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Diane Barrs, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
OTT, Chief Judge.
George Wicker, Jr., appeals from the judgments and sentences resulting from his jury convictions of armed burglary with assault and involuntary sexual battery. We find no merit to the points raised by appellant on appeal, except for those relating to certain aspects of the sentences.
First, the sentences do not reflect jail credit for time served, as required by section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1981). Accordingly, we remand for a determination of whether appellant is entitled to receive credit for time served. If so, such credit should be included in the sentence. See Wicker v. State, 438 So.2d 398 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Wicker v. State, 438 So.2d 399 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983).
Second, the trial court erred in retaining jurisdiction over one-third of each of the consecutive sentences imposed. Wicker; Wicker; Adams v. State, 435 So.2d 953 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). Therefore, we strike each of the special provisions for retention of jurisdiction and remand to the trial court with directions to reconsider the period of retention in accordance with section 947.16(3), Florida Statutes (1981).
We therefore AFFIRM appellant's convictions and REMAND for correction and reconsideration of the sentences in a manner consistent with this opinion.
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.
BOARDMAN and SCHEB, JJ., concur.