Case Name: Edmundo LUNA, Appellant, v. TOTAL MORTGAGE, LTD., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1988-11-15
Citations: 533 So. 2d 900
Docket Number: No. 88-1719
Parties: Edmundo LUNA, Appellant, v. TOTAL MORTGAGE, LTD., Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 533
Pages: 900–901

Head Matter:
Edmundo LUNA, Appellant, v. TOTAL MORTGAGE, LTD., Appellee.
No. 88-1719.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 15, 1988.
Alec Ross, North Miami Beach, for appellant.
Koppen, Watkins, Partners & Associates and Curtis J. Herbert, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellee has confessed error. Because appellee failed to refute appellant's affirmative defenses or to establish their legal insufficiency, genuine issues of material fact remain unresolved. Consequently, the trial court erred in entering final summary judgment. See First Nat 'l Entertainment Corp. v. Brumlik, 531 So.2d 403 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Mathews v. Dime Sav. Bank of New York, 507 So.2d 1196 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Aroll v. ITT Commercial Fin. Corp., 496 So.2d 1011 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); O'Neal v. Brady, 476 So.2d 294 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.