Case Name: Brodie L. Duke, Appellant, v. Daniel O'Dell et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1906-02-27
Citations: 184 N.Y. 555
Docket Number: 
Parties: Brodie L. Duke, Appellant, v. Daniel O’Dell et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 184
Pages: 555–555

Head Matter:
Brodie L. Duke, Appellant, v. Daniel O’Dell et al., Respondents.
Duke v. O’Dell, 100 App. Div. 517, affirmed.
(Argued February 13, 1906;
decided February 27, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 1, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term.
William F. Goldbeclc for appellant.
Richard Reid Rogers and Paul D. Gramath for respondents.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ. Absent: Cullen; Ch. J.