Case Name: E. LEONARD FRYLING AND HARRY F. FRYLING, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. HOWARD RUSS AND WARREN K. RUSS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1934-05-24
Citations: 113 N.J.L. 160
Docket Number: 
Parties: E. LEONARD FRYLING AND HARRY F. FRYLING, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. HOWARD RUSS AND WARREN K. RUSS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 113
Pages: 160–161

Head Matter:
E. LEONARD FRYLING AND HARRY F. FRYLING, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. HOWARD RUSS AND WARREN K. RUSS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Argued May 22, 1934
— Decided May 24, 1934.
For the defendants-appellants, Howard Faslwood.
For the plaintiffs-respondents, French, Richards & Bradley (Floyd H. Bradley).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
From an examination of the record in this case it is apparent that there were fact questions presented which were sub mitted by the trial judge to the jury in a charge that was faultless so far as any question is presented for our determination.
The judgment is affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Ciiiee Justice, Teen-chard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Dear, JJ. 12.
For reversal — Hone.