Case Name: In the Matter of the Claim of Yetta Sandberg against Seymour Dress Co., Inc., et al., Respondents. State Industrial Board, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1926-01-22
Citations: 242 N.Y. 497
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Claim of Yetta Sandberg against Seymour Dress Co., Inc., et al., Respondents. State Industrial Board, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 242
Pages: 497–498

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Claim of Yetta Sandberg against Seymour Dress Co., Inc., et al., Respondents. State Industrial Board, Appellant.
(Argued January 11, 1926;
decided January 22, 1926.)
Albert Ottinger, Attorney-General {E. C. Aiken of counsel), for appellant.
William H. Hokhkiss for respondents.

Opinion:
Order affirmed, with costs against State Industrial Board, on ground that section 13 of the Workmen's Compensation Law does not permit an award to the employee for medical treatment, etc., furnished by the employer.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ.