Case Name: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. EDITH M. RUSSELL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1975-11-24
Citations: 137 N.J. Super. 219
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. EDITH M. RUSSELL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 137
Pages: 219–219

Head Matter:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. EDITH M. RUSSELL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Supei’ior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Submitted November 12, 3975
Decided November 24, 1975.
Before Judges Matthews, Lora and Morgan.
Mr. Donald L. Garber, attorney for appellant.
Mr. Joseph C. Woodcock, Jr., Bergen County Prosecutor, attorney for respondent (Mr. Robert A. Bresin, Assistant Prosecutor, on the brief).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We affirm substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Pressler for the Bergen County Court which is reported at 135 N. J. Super. 154 (Law Div. 1975). See also, State v. Bucich, 134 N. J. Super. 111 (App. Div. 1975), certif. den. 68 N. J. 280 (1975).