Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Enrique Alfonso GAYLE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-05-10
Citations: 473 F. App'x 234
Docket Number: No. 12-6097
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Enrique Alfonso GAYLE, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 473
Pages: 234–235

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Enrique Alfonso GAYLE, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 12-6097.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 3, 2012.
Decided: May 10, 2012.
Enrique Alfonso Gayle, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Enrique Alfonso Gayle appeals the district court's order denying his motion for correction of clerical error in the criminal judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 36. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Gayle, No. 2:90-cr-00105-HCM-TEM-2 (E.D. Va. filed Dec. 19, 2011; entered Dec. 21, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.