Case Name: Axel Anderson, Respondent, v. Garfield Taylor, et al., Defendants, Garfield Taylor, Appellant
Court: Washington Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Washington
Decision Date: 1929-06-06
Citations: 152 Wash. 532
Docket Number: No. 21795
Parties: Axel Anderson, Respondent, v. Garfield Taylor, et al., Defendants, Garfield Taylor, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Washington Reports
Volume: 152
Pages: 532–533

Head Matter:
[No. 21795.
Department One.
June 6, 1929.]
Axel Anderson, Respondent, v. Garfield Taylor, et al., Defendants, Garfield Taylor, Appellant.
F. L. Morgan, for appellant.
J. W. Graham, for respondent.
Reported in 278 Pac. 412.

Opinion:
Per Curiam
Respondent opens his brief with several motions to strike, and to dismiss on the record as presented here, one of which, unfortunately for appellant, must be granted.
The notice of appeal from the entire judgment entered on September-29, 1928, was dated October 4, 1928, and filed in the office of the clerk of the lower court on October 6, 1928. The bond on appeal was executed October 11,1928, and filed in the office of the clerk of the lower court on October 13, 1928.
The bond was filed too late under the provisions of Eem. Oomp. Stat., § 1721.
Appellant cannot be heard to contradict the recitals of his own record oh appeal as to attempting to mail the bond within the time required by law. The attempted showing, however, does not show that the bond was actually received by the clerk within the statutory time.
The case is therefore ruled by our decisions in Watson v. Dumas, 125 Wash. 574, 216 Pac. 848 (a very parallel case) and Glesin v. Glesin, 125 Wash. 339, 216 Pac. 353.
The late rules of court, relating to appellate procedure, Eule X, 140 Wash, xlii (Eem. 1927 Sup., §308-10) have, made no change therein.
The appeal is therefore dismissed.