Case Name: Daniel Cunningham, Respondent v. The Manhattan Railway Company, et al., Appellants
Court: New York Superior Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1891-03-02
Citations: 27 Jones & S. 577
Docket Number: 
Parties: Daniel Cunningham, Respondent v. The Manhattan Railway Company, et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Reports of cases argued and determined in the Superior Court of the city of New York
Volume: 59
Pages: 577–577

Head Matter:
Daniel Cunningham, Respondent v. The Manhattan Railway Company, et al., Appellants.
Decided March 2, 1891.
Appeal from judgment entered on the findings and decision óf a judge on a trial at special term before the court without a jury.
Davies & Rapallo, for appellants.
Leo C. Dessar, for respondent.
Before Truax and Dugro, JJ.

Opinion:
The main question involved was as to the sufficiency of the evidence to uphold the judgment. The Court (Truax, J., writing, Dugro, J., concurring) held the evidence insufficient and reversed the judgment and ordered a new trial, with costs to the appellants to abide the event,'