Case Name: John I. BUFF, Defendant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-09-10
Citations: 98 S.W.3d 569
Docket Number: No. ED 80529
Parties: John I. BUFF, Defendant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent.
Judges: Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 98
Pages: 569–569

Head Matter:
John I. BUFF, Defendant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent.
No. ED 80529.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Sept. 10, 2002.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Feb. 20, 2003.
Application for Transfert Denied April 1, 2003.
James W. Schottel, Law Firm Schottel & Associates. P.C., St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Stephanie Morrell, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
John I. Buff (Appellant) appeals from the trial court's judgment denying his Rule 29.15 Pro Se Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence and Judgment (hereinafter Rule 29.15 motion) without a hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the trial court's decision is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2002, unless otherwise indicated.