Case Name: DUNCAN C. FELLER, Respondent on Review, v. WRIGHT, Petitioner on Review
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1990-05-10
Citations: 310 Or. 58
Docket Number: TC CV88-718; CA A60277; SC S36788
Parties: DUNCAN C. FELLER, Respondent on Review, v. WRIGHT, Petitioner on Review.
Judges: 
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 310
Pages: 58–58

Head Matter:
On petition for review filed January 2,
petition for review allowed and the decision of the Court of Appeals reversed and remanded to the Court of Appeals for further proceedings May 10, 1990
DUNCAN C. FELLER, Respondent on Review, v. WRIGHT, Petitioner on Review.
(TC CV88-718; CA A60277; SC S36788)
790 P2d 1140
Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General and Janet A. Metcalf, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, for petitioner on review.
Kurt C. Bendixsen and Garry L. Reynolds, P. C., Hermiston, for respondent on review.
No appearance contra.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further proceedings in the light of Lane v. Maass, 309 Or 671, 790 P2d 1137 (1990).