Case Name: George BRIDGES, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jerry R. TOWNSEND, Assistant Warden; Eliza S. Willis, Treatment Program Supervisor; M.K. Lefevers, NCC Unit Manager, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-11-24
Citations: 623 F. App'x 105
Docket Number: No. 15-7189
Parties: George BRIDGES, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jerry R. TOWNSEND, Assistant Warden; Eliza S. Willis, Treatment Program Supervisor; M.K. Lefevers, NCC Unit Manager, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 623
Pages: 105–106

Head Matter:
George BRIDGES, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jerry R. TOWNSEND, Assistant Warden; Eliza S. Willis, Treatment Program Supervisor; M.K. Lefevers, NCC Unit Manager, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15-7189.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 19, 2015.
Decided: Nov. 24, 2015.
George Bridges, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Margaret Hoehl O’Shea, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:-
George Bridges, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bridges v. Townsend, No. 2:12-ev-00703-MSD-TEM (E.D.Va. filed July 2, 2015, entered July 6, 2015). We- dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.