Case Name: UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. SIDES
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1913-12-01
Citations: 231 U.S. 213
Docket Number: No. 683
Parties: UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. SIDES.
Judges: Mu. Justice Hughes dissents.
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 231
Pages: 213–214

Head Matter:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. SIDES.
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF COLORADO.
No. 683.
Submitted October 14, 1913.
Decided December 1, 1913.
Decided on the authority of Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. Snow, ante, p. 204.
133 Pac. Rep. 1040, reversed.
The facts are stated in the opinion
Mr. N. H. Loomis, Mr. C. C. Dorsey and Mr. E. I. Thayer for plaintiff in error.
Mr: Milton Smith, Mr. Charles R. Brock and Mr. W. H. ' Ferguson for defendants in error.

Opinion:
Mr. Justice McKenna
delivered the opinion of the court.
Action in ejectment, brought by plaintiff in error, called here plaintiff, .against defendants in error, here called defendants, in the District Court of Arapahoe County, State of Colorado.
Except' as to the description of the land the complaint is substantially the same as that in No. 682 and presents the same legal rights and titles. Defendant Sides demurred to the complaint-; Scherrer denied-being in possession of the land and disclaimed any claim to it. The demurrer was overruled and Scherrer answered, setting up defenses which are in substance the same as in No. 682. To the defenses plaintiff filed demurrers, which were abstained. Sides elécted to plead no further and the case coming on for trial and certain facts being agreed upon as testified to, objection to the materiality of which was made, motions to dismiss and for judgment were also made and overruled. Judgment was entered for plaintiff. It was reversed by the Supreme Court of the State, for the reasons stated in its opinion in Snow v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., that is, No. 682, ante, p. 204, 133 Pac. Rep. 1040.
This. case was submitted with No. 682, involves the same questions and is determined by its decision.-
Judgment reversed and cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith.
Mu. Justice Hughes dissents.
-' Mr. Justice Holmes and Mr. Justice. Pitney took no part in the decision.