Case Name: LUTHER KOUNTZE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE PROPRIETORS OF THE MORRIS AQUEDUCT ET AL., DEFENDANTS IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1896-03
Citations: 58 N.J.L. 695
Docket Number: 
Parties: LUTHER KOUNTZE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE PROPRIETORS OF THE MORRIS AQUEDUCT ET AL., DEFENDANTS IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 58
Pages: 695–695

Head Matter:
LUTHER KOUNTZE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE PROPRIETORS OF THE MORRIS AQUEDUCT ET AL., DEFENDANTS IN ERROR.
On error.
For the plaintiff in error, Alfred Mills.
For the defendants in error, Henry C. Pitney, Jr.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The legal questions involved in this ease were, we think, rightly dealt with in the opinion of the Supreme Court. The matters of fact decided in that court are not subject to review in the Court of Errors.
The judgment below must be affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief • Justice, Depue, Dixon, Gummere, Ludlow, Barkalow, Bogert, Nixon. 9.
For reversal—None.