Case Name: Brobst v. City of Williamsport, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1910-02-16
Citations: 227 Pa. 596
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 406
Parties: Brobst v. City of Williamsport, Appellant.
Judges: Before Fell, C. J., Mestrezat, Elkin, Stewart and Moschzisker, JJ. ■
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 227
Pages: 596–597

Head Matter:
Brobst v. City of Williamsport, Appellant.
Argued Feb. 16, 1910.
Appeal, No. 406,
Jan. T., 1909, by, defendant, from judgment of C. P. Lycoming Co., Sept. T.,-1908, No. 452, on verdict for plaintiff in case of William MiBrobst v. The City of Williamsport.
Before Fell, C. J., Mestrezat, Elkin, Stewart and Moschzisker, JJ. ■
Affirmed.
Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries. .
Frank P. Cummings, city solicitor, for appellant.
Charles J. Reilly, for appellee.

Opinion:
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Stewart,
March 28, 1910:
The questions raised in this appeal are the same as those raised in No. 405, January Term, 1909, ante, p. 591. The ap pellee here recovered in the court below for injuries received in the same accident that was the basis of recovery in that case. Both cases were argued together, the facts and the law governing being the same in each. For the reasons stated in the opinion filed in No. 405, January Term, 1909, the assignments of error in this case are overruled, and the judgment is affirmed.