Case Name: Henry Nordlinger, Resp't, v. Morris Levine, App'lt
Court: New York Court of Common Pleas
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1892-03-07
Citations: 45 N.Y. St. Rep. 52
Docket Number: 
Parties: Henry Nordlinger, Resp’t, v. Morris Levine, App’lt.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 45
Pages: 52–52

Head Matter:
Henry Nordlinger, Resp’t, v. Morris Levine, App’lt.
(New York Common Pleas, General Term,
Filed March 7, 1892.)
Appeal—Reabgtjment.
A motion for reargument of an appeal in the common pleas will not be entertained unless presented, at farthest, to the term next succeeding that at which the appeal was decided.
Motion for reargument.
Goodhart & Phillips, for the motion; Guggenheimer & TJntermyer, opposed.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
application is too late. By the settled practice of the court a motion for a reargument will not be entertained unless presented, at farthest, to the term next succeeding that at which the appeal was decided. Independently, however, •of this formal objection, the motion is without merit.
Eeargument denied, with costs.
Bookstaver, Bischoff and Pryor, JJ., concur.