Case Name: Ronald David ATKINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-12-14
Citations: 570 So. 2d 1147
Docket Number: No. 90-389
Parties: Ronald David ATKINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SMITH, NIMMONS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 570
Pages: 1147–1147

Head Matter:
Ronald David ATKINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 90-389.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Dec. 14, 1990.
Barbara M. Linthicum, Public Defender, P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Bradley R. Bischoff, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm on both issues raised by appellant. As to the constitutional attack upon Section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1988 Supp.), we affirm on the authority of Smith v. State, 567 So.2d 55 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Arnold v. State, 566 So.2d 37 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Roberts v. State, 559 So.2d 289 (Fla. 2d DCA), dismissed, 564 So.2d 488 (Fla.1990); King v. State, 557 So.2d 899 (Fla. 5th DCA), review denied, 564 So.2d 1086 (Fla.1990). Cf. Barber v. State, 564 So.2d 1169 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).
We also reject appellant's arguments on the second issue relating to alleged procedural irregularities in connection with the imposition of the habitual offender sentence.
AFFIRMED.
SMITH, NIMMONS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.