Case Name: Andrea Cortes, Respondent, v. Alfred Donaldson et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2017-03-08
Citations: 148 A.D.3d 771
Docket Number: 
Parties: Andrea Cortes, Respondent, v Alfred Donaldson et al., Appellants.
Judges: Rivera, J.R, Austin, Roman, Hinds-Radix and Connolly, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 148
Pages: 771–772

Head Matter:
Andrea Cortes, Respondent, v Alfred Donaldson et al., Appellants.
[47 NYS3d 911]

Opinion:
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Martin, J.), dated December 21, 2015, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The defendants met their prima facie burden of showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345 [2002]; Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). The defendants submitted competent medical evidence establishing, prima facie, that the alleged injury to the cervical region of the plaintiff's spine did not constitute a serious injury under either the permanent consequential limitation of use or significant limitation of use categories of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see Staff v Yshua, 59 AD3d 614 [2009]).
In opposition, however, the plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact as to whether she sustained a serious injury to the cervical region of her spine under the permanent consequential limitation of use and significant limitation of use categories of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see Perl v Meher, 18 NY3d 208, 218-219 [2011]).
Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Rivera, J.R, Austin, Roman, Hinds-Radix and Connolly, JJ., concur.