Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Jesus SANCHEZ-SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-05-19
Citations: 97 F. App'x 765
Docket Number: No. 03-30277
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Jesus SANCHEZ-SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 97
Pages: 765–766

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Jesus SANCHEZ-SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 03-30277.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 10, 2004.
Decided May 19, 2004.
James Peters, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Boise, ID, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Samuel Richard Rubin, Boise, ID, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: CANBY, ROZINSRI and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Jose Jesus Sanchez-Sanchez appeals his sentence of 46 months imposed following his guilty plea to illegal reentry of an alien deported subsequent to an aggravated felony conviction, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
Sanchez-Sanchez contends that the district court improperly concluded that it did not have discretion to grant a downward departure based on the fact that his predicate felony offense was outside the "heart land" of cases subject to a sixteen-level enhancement under United States Sentencing Guidelines § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A), and that his criminal history was over-represented. We disagree. Our review of the record indicates that the district court was aware of its authority to depart downward, but concluded that a departure was not warranted given Sanchez-Sanchez's criminal history and behavior. Because the district court recognized its authority to depart downward, but declined to do so, we cannot review the district court's decision. See United States v. Romero, 293 F.3d 1120, 1126-27 (9th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1144, 123 S.Ct. 948, 154 L.Ed.2d 844 (2003).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.