Case Name: Ernest C. BRAZZLE, Appellant, v. CITY OF FLORISSANT, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1997-06-27
Citations: 948 S.W.2d 199
Docket Number: No. 71339
Parties: Ernest C. BRAZZLE, Appellant, v. CITY OF FLORISSANT, Respondent.
Judges: Before RHODES RUSSELL, P.J., and SIMON and KAROHL, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 948
Pages: 199–200

Head Matter:
Ernest C. BRAZZLE, Appellant, v. CITY OF FLORISSANT, Respondent.
No. 71339.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
June 27, 1997.
Lawrence J. Altman, Chesterfield, for appellant.
John M. Hessell, Robert J. Golterman, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before RHODES RUSSELL, P.J., and SIMON and KAROHL, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Ernest C. Brazzle, appeals from a judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County in favor of respondent, the City of Florissant, on his claims of age discrimination, handicap discrimination, and retaliation, allegedly resulting in his discharge from the Florissant Police Department.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).