Case Name: Lee WILSON, d/b/a Lee Wilson Company, Appellant, v. C. E. ROBINSON, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1958-07-03
Citations: 104 So. 2d 124
Docket Number: No. 57-474
Parties: Lee WILSON, d/b/a Lee Wilson Company, Appellant, v. C. E. ROBINSON, Appellee.
Judges: CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 104
Pages: 124–124

Head Matter:
Lee WILSON, d/b/a Lee Wilson Company, Appellant, v. C. E. ROBINSON, Appellee.
No. 57-474.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
July 3, 1958.
Hudson, McNutt, Campbell, Isom & Reariclc, Miami, for appellant.
Pruitt & Pruitt, Miami, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed upon the rule stated in American Mercantile Co. v. Circular Advertising Co., 71 Fla. 522, 71 So. 607, 608, to the effect that when testimony for a defendant was uncertain and not sufficient to sustain a verdict for the defendant, there was no error in directing a verdict for the plainjiff who successfully carried the burden of proof on the issues presented.
Affirmed.
CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.