Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jesse James SNIDER, Appellant; Jesse James SNIDER, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-01-13
Citations: 959 S.W.2d 922
Docket Number: Nos. 67194, 70961
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jesse James SNIDER, Appellant. Jesse James SNIDER, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before AHRENS, P.J., and CRANDALL and KAROHL, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 959
Pages: 922–923

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jesse James SNIDER, Appellant. Jesse James SNIDER, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 67194, 70961.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Jan. 13, 1998.
Raymund J. Capelovitch, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Cristi A. Ingalsbe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before AHRENS, P.J., and CRANDALL and KAROHL, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals after sentencing on four counts of forgery, Section 570.090.1(4) RSMo 1986 and denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. The only issues presented relate to the Rule 29.15 appeal. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment. Judg ments affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b)and 84.16(b).