Case Name: Nathan SHERROD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1996-02-20
Citations: 915 S.W.2d 795
Docket Number: No. WD 51032
Parties: Nathan SHERROD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before SPINDEN, P.J., and BERREY and LAURA DENVIR STITH, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 915
Pages: 795–795

Head Matter:
Nathan SHERROD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 51032.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Feb. 20, 1996.
Rose M. Wibbenmeyer, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General; Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Special Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before SPINDEN, P.J., and BERREY and LAURA DENVIR STITH, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Nathan Sherrod pled guilty to the Class B felony of sale of a controlled substance in violation of Section 195.211, RSMo 1994. He was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to a term of imprisonment of seven years. He filed a Rule 24.035 motion to vacate the judgment and sentence, which was denied as untimely. Mr. Sherrod appeals, contending that the 90-day time limit for filing a motion under Rule 24.035 violates his due process rights because it arbitrarily denies him reasonable access to post-conviction relief.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. Finding no error, we affirm. Because a published opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential value, we affirm by this summary order under Rule 84.16. In addition, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth our reasoning.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).