Case Name: John BLANKENSHIP, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Charles HUCKSTEP, d/b/a HUCKSTEP OIL COMPANY, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-12-05
Citations: 911 S.W.2d 672
Docket Number: No. 67909
Parties: John BLANKENSHIP, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Charles HUCKSTEP, d/b/a HUCKSTEP OIL COMPANY, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANE, C.J., SIMON, J., and CHARLES B. BLACKMAR, Senior Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 911
Pages: 672–672

Head Matter:
John BLANKENSHIP, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Charles HUCKSTEP, d/b/a HUCKSTEP OIL COMPANY, Defendant/Respondent.
No. 67909.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Dec. 5, 1995.
Jeffrey P. Hine, Oliver, Oliver & Waltz, P.C., Cape Girardeau, for appellant.
Walter S. Drusch, Lowes & Druseh, Cape Girardeau, for respondent.
Before CRANE, C.J., SIMON, J., and CHARLES B. BLACKMAR, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant claiming that a genuine issue as to a material fact existed. We affirm.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).