Case Name: Braun Equipment Company, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Meli Borelli Associates, Respondent, and Credit Suisse, Appellant, et al., Defendant. (And a Third-Party Action.)
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1995-10-19
Citations: 220 A.D.2d 311
Docket Number: 
Parties: Braun Equipment Company, Inc., Plaintiff, v Meli Borelli Associates, Respondent, and Credit Suisse, Appellant, et al., Defendant. (And a Third-Party Action.)
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 220
Pages: 311–312

Head Matter:
Braun Equipment Company, Inc., Plaintiff, v Meli Borelli Associates, Respondent, and Credit Suisse, Appellant, et al., Defendant. (And a Third-Party Action.)
[632 NYS2d 549]

Opinion:
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered June 9, 1995, which, insofar as appealed from, granted defendant Meli Borelli Associates' motion to compel arbitration, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The only litigation activity of defendant-respondent was the service of routine pleadings, with no more detail than was minimally necessary, and which, under the circumstances, did not constitute particularized assertions of any right to substantive relief. Thus, the IAS Court correctly determined that defendant-respondent had not waived its right to arbitration since it had not "actively participated" in the litigation process and therefore had not "manifested an affirmative acceptance of the judicial process" (Jorge v Sutton, 134 AD2d 573, Iv denied 71 NY2d 807). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Kupferman, Williams and Tom, JJ.