Case Name: Tamara HULSEY, Employee/Appellant, v. FIRST LODGING OF FOREST PARK, Employer/Respondent, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-12-18
Citations: 389 S.W.3d 234
Docket Number: No. ED 98508
Parties: Tamara HULSEY, Employee/Appellant, v. FIRST LODGING OF FOREST PARK, Employer/Respondent, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent.
Judges: Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, J. and LISA S. VAN AMBURG, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 389
Pages: 234–234

Head Matter:
Tamara HULSEY, Employee/Appellant, v. FIRST LODGING OF FOREST PARK, Employer/Respondent, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent.
No. ED 98508.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Dec. 18, 2012.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 22, 2013.
John J. Ammann, St. Louis University Legal Clinic, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Ninion S. Riley, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent, Division of Employment Security.
First Lodging of Forest Park, St. Louis, MO, pro se.
Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, J. and LISA S. VAN AMBURG, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Tamara Hulsey appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying her unemployment benefits. Claimant contends the Commission erred in finding her appeal was untimely filed with the Appeals Tribunal and she lacked good cause for her untimely filing.
The order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).