Case Name: Douglas Lee SMALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHIEF OF POLICE; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-05-31
Citations: 20 F. App'x 629
Docket Number: No. 00-16084; D.C. No. CV-98-01819-SMM
Parties: Douglas Lee SMALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHIEF OF POLICE; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 20
Pages: 629–629

Head Matter:
Douglas Lee SMALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHIEF OF POLICE; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 00-16084.
D.C. No. CV-98-01819-SMM.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 14, 2001.
Decided May 31, 2001.
Before PREGERSON, FERNANDEZ, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Douglas Lee Smith, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court's order denying his motion to vacate the district court's judgment dismissing his complaint. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion and affirm. See Plotkin v. Pacific Tel. & Tel. Co., 688 F.2d 1291,1292-93 (9th Cir.1982).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.