Case Name: In the Matter of Morris H. Siegel, Respondent, against Harold J. Crawford, a Justice of the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Respondent. Mae Harding, Intervener, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1943-11-24
Citations: 291 N.Y. 723
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Morris H. Siegel, Respondent, against Harold J. Crawford, a Justice of the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Respondent. Mae Harding, Intervener, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 291
Pages: 723–724

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Morris H. Siegel, Respondent, against Harold J. Crawford, a Justice of the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Respondent. Mae Harding, Intervener, Appellant.
Submitted November 15, 1943;
decided November 24, 1943.
Lawrence 8. Timen for motion.
E. F. W. Wildermuth opposed.

Opinion:
Motion denied, without costs and without prejudice to a new application to dismiss the appeal upon proof that the service of the notice of appeal was not made within sixty days after service of entry of the order appealed from, or within the period permitted by section 592, subdivision 5-a of the Civil Practice Act.