Case Name: Disciplinary Counsel v. Stollings
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2007-06-26
Citations: 114 Ohio St. 3d 1208
Docket Number: No. 2006-1146
Parties: Disciplinary Counsel v. Stollings.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 114
Pages: 1208–1208

Head Matter:
Disciplinary Counsel v. Stollings.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Stollings, 114 Ohio St.3d 1208, 2007-Ohio-3395.]
(No. 2006-1146
Submitted June 19, 2007
Decided June 26, 2007.)

Opinion:
{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Jerry Chad Stollings, Attorney Registration No. 0073342, last known business address in Paulding, Ohio.
{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of November 1, 2006, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of six months, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,
{¶ 3} It is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.
{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.
{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Stollings, 111 Ohio St.3d 155, 2006-Ohio-5345, 855 N.E.2d 479.
Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Lanzinger and Cupp, JJ., concur.