Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. George MORGAN, Appellant; George MORGAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-06-27
Citations: 900 S.W.2d 281
Docket Number: Nos. 63216, 66961
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. George MORGAN, Appellant. George MORGAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before SMITH, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and WHITE, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 900
Pages: 281–281

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. George MORGAN, Appellant. George MORGAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 63216, 66961.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
June 27, 1995.
Judith C. LaRose, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before SMITH, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and WHITE, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals from his conviction by a jury of two counts of sodomy and one count of rape and his sentence as a prior offender to consecutive fifteen year prison terms for each count. He also appeals from denial of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion without evidentiary hearing. No error of law appears, the verdict is supported by the evidence, and the issues raised by the defendant are without merit. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment on the rule 29.15 motion is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous, no error of law appears, and an opinion would have no precedential value.
Judgments on direct appeal and on Rule 29.15 appeal are affirmed. Rules 30.25(b), 84.16(b).