Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donnell COPPEDGE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-12-23
Citations: 589 F. App'x 103
Docket Number: No. 14-7293
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donnell COPPEDGE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 589
Pages: 103–104

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donnell COPPEDGE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 14-7293.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 18, 2014.
Decided: Dec. 23, 2014.
Donnell Coppedge, Appellant Pro Se. Rudulf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Shailika S. Kotiya, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina; William Glenn Perry, Office of the United States Attorney, Green-ville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Donnell Coppedge appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a new sentencing hearing. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Coppedge, No. 4:09-cr-00054-F-l (E.D.N.C. Aug. 1, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.