Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carl Benit COOPER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-10-21
Citations: 48 F. App'x 427
Docket Number: No. 02-7126
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carl Benit COOPER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 48
Pages: 427–428

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carl Benit COOPER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-7126.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 10, 2002.
Decided: Oct. 21, 2002.
Carl Benit Cooper, Appellant Pro Se. Lee Ellis Berlinsky, Office of the United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Carl Benit Cooper appeals the district court's order denying his motion filed under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Cooper, No. CR-95-206 (D.S.C. filed July 15, 2002; entered July 16, 2002). We deny Cooper's motion for general relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.