Case Name: In the Matter of Shawn Cornwall, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2001-10-25
Citations: 287 A.D.2d 911
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Shawn Cornwall, Petitioner, v Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 287
Pages: 911–912

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Shawn Cornwall, Petitioner, v Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.
[731 NYS2d 561]

Opinion:
—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit violent conduct and assault on a staff member. The misbehavior report related that petitioner had been escorted from his cell in manacles to facilitate a routine cell frisk. Once the search had been completed, petitioner refused to return to his cell and struck one of the escorting correction officers under the left eye with his cuffed hands. Four additional officers were needed to subdue petitioner and return him to his cell. Introduced in evidence at the disciplinary hearing were the misbehavior report and the testimony of the correction officer who was the author of the report and who had been the victim of petitioner's assault. This was sufficient to constitute substantial evidence supporting the determination of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Hinckson v Selsky, 259 AD2d 812, lv dismissed 94 NY2d 782). Petitioner's contention that he was denied the right to present documentary evidence in the form of a videotape of the incident in question is meritless as the record discloses that such a tape does not exist (see, Matter of Mena v Goord, 275 AD2d 828; Matter of Donato v Duncan, 272 AD2d 767, 768). Petitioner's remaining contentions, including his assertion of Hearing Officer bias, have been examined and found to be either without merit or unpreserved for our review.
Cardona, P. J., Peters, Spain, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.