Case Name: Eric JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Marvin RANDOLPH; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-01-15
Citations: 54 F. App'x 286
Docket Number: No. 02-15600; D.C. No. CV-00-06013
Parties: Eric JOHNSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Marvin RANDOLPH; et al., Defendants—Appellees,
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 54
Pages: 286–286

Head Matter:
Eric JOHNSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Marvin RANDOLPH; et al., Defendants—Appellees,
No. 02-15600.
D.C. No. CV-00-06013.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 13, 2003.
Decided Jan. 15, 2003.
Before BEEZER, KLEINFELD and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument, and denies Johnson’s request for oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
California state prisoner Eric Johnson appeals pro se the district court's judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1117, No. 00-16568 (9th Cir.2003), and we affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Johnson's action because it was clear from the face of his complaint that he failed to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing suit. See McKinney v. Carey, 311 F.3d 1198, 1199-1200 (9th Cir.2002) (per curiam).
We lack jurisdiction to consider the district court's order denying Johnson's post-judgment motion for reconsideration because Johnson failed to file an amended notice of appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(4)(B)®.
We deny Johnson's motion for appointment of counsel.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.