Case Name: In the Matter of Earl N. Darrow, an Attorney, Resignor
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1992-11-18
Citations: 183 A.D.2d 369
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Earl N. Darrow, an Attorney, Resignor.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 183
Pages: 369–370

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Earl N. Darrow, an Attorney, Resignor.
Fourth Department,
November 18, 1992
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Gerard M. LaRusso, Buffalo (Vincent J. Scarsella of counsel), for Office of Grievance Committees.
Earl N. Darrow, San Bernardino, resignor pro se.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Per Curiam.
The above-named attorney was admitted to practice by this Court on February 18, 1976 and is currently in good standing. He has submitted an affidavit requesting that this Court accept his resignation from the practice of law in New York State. His affidavit states that he has relocated to the State of California where he now practices law, that he has no intention of returning to practice in this State and that he is resigning because he no longer wishes to maintain his attor ney registration in New York. There are currently no complaints pending against him.
Accordingly, we grant the application and direct that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys.
Denman, P. J., Callahan, Boomer, Green and Pine, JJ., concur.
Resignation accepted and name stricken from roll of attorneys.