Case Name: Terrance MASSEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. State of MARYLAND; Richard B. Rosenblatt, Director of Patuxent Institution, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-02-27
Citations: 30 F. App'x 112
Docket Number: No. 01-8087
Parties: Terrance MASSEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. State of MARYLAND; Richard B. Rosenblatt, Director of Patuxent Institution, Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 30
Pages: 112–112

Head Matter:
Terrance MASSEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. State of MARYLAND; Richard B. Rosenblatt, Director of Patuxent Institution, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 01-8087.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 14, 2002.
Decided Feb. 27, 2002.
Terrance Massey, pro se.
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Terrance Massey seeks to appeal the district court's order and order on reconsideration denying relief on his second petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). Massey never received authorization to file a second § 2254 petition, and consequently, the district court lacked authority to act on Massey's second petition. See 28 U.S.C.A. § 2244(b) (West 1994 & Supp.2001). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See Massey v. Maryland, No. CA-01-3086-MJG (D. Md. filed Nov. 7, 2001, entered Nov. 8, 2001; filed Nov. 30, 2001, entered Dec. 3, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.
DISMISSED.