Case Name: Joseph MITCHELL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-05-15
Citations: 278 F. App'x 714
Docket Number: No. 07-17065
Parties: Joseph MITCHELL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, THOMAS and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 278
Pages: 714–714

Head Matter:
Joseph MITCHELL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 07-17065.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 12, 2008.
May 15, 2008.
Joseph Mitchell, Soledad, CA, pro se.
Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, THOMAS and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
A review of the record and the response to this court's March 14, 2008 order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Appellant is not in the custody of the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement ("ICE"). He therefore cannot challenge ICE's action or inaction regarding his removal. See Campos v. INS, 62 F.3d 311, 314 (9th Cir.1995).
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.
All pending motions are denied as moot.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.