Case Name: UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Private (E-1) Darcelle G. WORDLOW (aka Darcelle G. Greene), [ XXX-XX-XXXX ], United States Army, Appellant
Court: United States Army Court of Military Review
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1985-02-28
Citations: 19 M.J. 981
Docket Number: SPCM 20018
Parties: UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Private (E-1) Darcelle G. WORDLOW (aka Darcelle G. Greene), [ XXX-XX-XXXX ], United States Army, Appellant.
Judges: Before WOLD, NAUGHTON and COHEN, Appellate Military Judges.
Reporter: West's Military Justice Reporter
Volume: 19
Pages: 981–983

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Private (E-1) Darcelle G. WORDLOW (aka Darcelle G. Greene), [ XXX-XX-XXXX ], United States Army, Appellant.
SPCM 20018.
U.S. Army Court of Military Review.
28 Feb. 1985.
Lieutenant Colonel Paul J. Luedtke, JAGC, Captain L. Sue Hayn, JAGC, and Captain Barry Rothman, JAGC, were on the pleadings for appellant.
Colonel James Kucera, JAGC, Lieutenant Colonel John T. Edwards, JAGC, Captain Thomas E. Booth, JAGC, and Captain Leonard L. Lucey, JAGC, were on the pleadings for appellee.
Before WOLD, NAUGHTON and COHEN, Appellate Military Judges.
. Judge Robert E. Cohen took final action on this case prior to his retirement from active service.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
NAUGHTON, Judge:
Appellant contends that he was prejudiced by the sentence limitation terms of the pretrial agreement which were operative only if a punitive discharge was adjudged. In light of United States v. Castleberry, 18 M.J. 826 (ACMR 1984), and United States v. Holmes, 17 M.J. 830 (ACMR), pet. denied, 18 M.J. 438 (CMA 1984), we find this contention to be without merit. Such provisions are not violative of public policy.
Appellant also contends that the convening authority erred in failing to grant appellant administrative credit for pretrial confinement served. See United States v. Allen, 17 M.J. 126 (CMA 1984). We need not now rule on this matter. See United States v. Clark, 17 M.J. 431 (CMA 1984) (summary disposition).
The findings of guilty and the sentence are affirmed.
Judge COHEN concurs.