Case Name: William Anderson and Robert Barry, Partners, etc., Plaintiffs in Error, v. The Inhabitants of the City of Bordentown, N. J.
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1912-01-15
Citations: 223 U.S. 714
Docket Number: No. 803
Parties: William Anderson and Robert Barry, Partners, etc., Plaintiffs in Error, v. The Inhabitants of the City of Bordentown, N. J.
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 223
Pages: 714–714

Head Matter:
No. 803.
William Anderson and Robert Barry, Partners, etc., Plaintiffs in Error, v. The Inhabitants of the City of Bordentown, N. J.
In error to .the.Court of Errors and Appeals of the State of New Jersey.
Motion to dismiss submitted January 9, 1912.
Decided January 15, 1912.
Mr. E. A'. Armstrong for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Frederic D. McKenney, Mr. J. Spalding Flannery and Mr. William Hitz for the defendant in error.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Writ of error dismissed
for the want of jurisdiction. St. Paul &c. R. R. Co. v. County of Todd, 142 U. S. 282; St. Paul Gas Light Co. v. St. Paul, 181 U. S. 142; New Orleans Water Works Co. v. Louisiana, 185 U. S. 336, 350, and cases cited; Hamblin v. Western Land Co., 147 U. S. 531; Farrell v. O'Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Los Angeles Farming & Milling Co. v. Los Angeles, 217 U. S. 217, 226.