Case Name: EDWARD AGACINSKI vs. CITY OF MERIDEN
Court: Connecticut Superior Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1941-10-07
Citations: 10 Conn. Supp. 25
Docket Number: File No. 61040
Parties: EDWARD AGACINSKI vs. CITY OF MERIDEN
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Supplement
Volume: 10
Pages: ?–26

Head Matter:
EDWARD AGACINSKI vs. CITY OF MERIDEN
Superior Court New Haven County
File No. 61040
MEMORANDUM FILED OCTOBER 7, 1941.
Edward M. Rosenthal, of Meriden, and David M. Reilly, of New Haven, for the Plaintiff.
Watrous, Gumbart & Corbin, of New Haven, for the Defendant.

Opinion:
DICKENSON, J.
The complaint alleges in substance that' the injury was caused by a defective condition of a sidewalk .made "more dangerous and defective... .due to an accumulation of ice and snow. ." and, later in the complaint, that "as a direct and proximate result of the aforesaid defective •condition of the sidewalk" the plaintiff was injured.
The complaint is general enough to support recovery for an injury arising out of the condition of the pavement with .snow and ice not an essential contributory cause and the defective condition the real proximate cause. Frechette vs. City of New Haven, 104 Conn. 83, 90, 91.
The demurrer is therefore overruled.