Case Name: Janet Marie YOUNG et al., Appellants, v. Dale A. BOYLE and Anabelle L. Boyle, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1976-11-19
Citations: 340 So. 2d 939
Docket Number: No. 76-1060
Parties: Janet Marie YOUNG et al., Appellants, v. Dale A. BOYLE and Anabelle L. Boyle, Appellees.
Judges: MAGER, C. J., and CROSS and DOW-NEY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 340
Pages: 939–940

Head Matter:
Janet Marie YOUNG et al., Appellants, v. Dale A. BOYLE and Anabelle L. Boyle, Appellees.
No. 76-1060.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Nov. 19, 1976.
Edna L. Caruso, of D’Aiuto, Dean, Anderson, Morgan, Ringers & Walker, Orlando, for appellants.
James A. Sisserson of Nance & Caccia-tore, Melbourne, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Upon review of the briefs and record in this cause we are of the opinion that the learned trial court erred in entering a partial summary judgment against the defendants on the issue of liability. See DeCleir v. Clark, 269 So.2d 691 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972). As pointed out in DeCleir, supra, whether the defendant driver's explanation is sufficient to overcome the presumption of negligence (where the defendant driver's vehicle strikes the rear of another vehicle) is a matter which under the totality of the cir cumstances in this cause was within the exclusive province of the jury. Accordingly, the order of partial summary judgment is vacated and set aside and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.
MAGER, C. J., and CROSS and DOW-NEY, JJ., concur.