Case Name: CITY OF PORTAGE DES SIOUX, Respondent, v. Paul MORTON, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-06-27
Citations: 26 S.W.3d 294
Docket Number: No. ED 75819
Parties: CITY OF PORTAGE DES SIOUX, Respondent, v. Paul MORTON, Appellant.
Judges: Before MARY RHODES RUSSELL, C.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and CHARLES BLACKMAR, Sr.J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 26
Pages: 294–294

Head Matter:
CITY OF PORTAGE DES SIOUX, Respondent, v. Paul MORTON, Appellant.
No. ED 75819.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
June 27, 2000.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 3, 2000.
Application for Transfer Denied Oct. 3, 2000.
William James O’Herin, Florissant, for appellant.
Stephen A. Martin, St. Charles, for respondent.
Before MARY RHODES RUSSELL, C.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and CHARLES BLACKMAR, Sr.J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Paul Morton ("Morton") appeals the judgment in favor of the City of Portage Des Sioux ("City") enjoining him from maintaining a nuisance on his property and awarding City attorneys' fees and monetary sanctions pursuant to Rule 55.03 and Section 514.205 RSMo 1994.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The judgment is supported by substantial and competent evidence in the record and is not against the weight of the evidence. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, furnished the parties with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).