Case Name: ONE FORD ROADSTER AUTOMOBILE et al. v. STATE ex rel. SAYE, Co. Atty.
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1922-11-28
Citations: 87 Okla. 285
Docket Number: No. 10905
Parties: ONE FORD ROADSTER AUTOMOBILE et al. v. STATE ex rel. SAYE, Co. Atty.
Judges: KANE, JOHNSON, McNEILL, MILLER, and KENNAMER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 87
Pages: 285–285

Head Matter:
ONE FORD ROADSTER AUTOMOBILE et al. v. STATE ex rel. SAYE, Co. Atty.
No. 10905
Opinion Filed Nov. 28, 1922.
(Syllabus.)
Appeal and Error — Reversal on Confession of Error.
Where the defendant in error files a confession of error, the judgment of the trial court will be reversed.
Error from County Court, Jefferson County ; E. L. Dillard, County Judge.
Action by the State of Oklahoma, on the relation of Ben F. Saye, County Attorney, for the forfeiture of one Ford roadster automobile. Sam Kennedy interpleaded in said case. Judgment for plaintiff, and Kennedy, appeals.
Reversed and remanded.
Bridges & Vertrees and J. H. Harper, for plaintiff in error.
George F. Short, Atty. Gen., 'and N. W. Gore, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.

Opinion:
NICHOLSON, J.
This action was brought in the county court of Jefferson county by the county attorney of said county, praying the forfeiture of one Ford roadster automobile, which, it was alleged, was being used by Sam Kennedy to convey intoxicating liquor in Jefferson county, in violation of the statutes of the state.
Sam Kennedy filed his interplea in said cause, in which he alleged that he was the owner of said automobile and denied that the same was purchased, kept, or used for the purpose of violating any of the prohibitory laws of the state, and demanded that the issues of fact and property rights be tried by a jury.
A trial by jury was denied, and judgment of forfeiture rendered, from which this appeal was perfected.
The Attorney General, for the defendant in error, has filed a confession of error, and suggested that the judgment be reversed, and for this reason the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded for a new trial.
KANE, JOHNSON, McNEILL, MILLER, and KENNAMER, JJ., concur.