Case Name: NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Elois C. BAXTER, Defendant-Appellant, and The Summit Community Association, Inc.; The United States of America, Acting by and through its agency, The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-12-21
Citations: 706 F. App'x 799
Docket Number: No. 17-2028
Parties: NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Elois C. BAXTER, Defendant-Appellant, and The Summit Community Association, Inc.; The United States of America, Acting by and through its agency, The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Defendants.
Judges: Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 706
Pages: 799–799

Head Matter:
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Elois C. BAXTER, Defendant-Appellant, and The Summit Community Association, Inc.; The United States of America, Acting by and through its agency, The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Defendants.
No. 17-2028
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: December 19, 2017
Decided: December 21, 2017
Elois C. Baxter, Appellant Pro Se. Travis Emil Menk, BROCK & SCOTT, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Elois C. Baxter seeks to appeal the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation and remanding this removed action to state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. "[A] district court may remand a case . for lack of subject matter jurisdiction at any time, and such an order is not reviewable." Doe v. Blair, 819 F.3d 64, 66-67 (4th Cir. 2016) (citations omitted); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), (d) (2012). Because we lack jurisdiction to review the district court's order, we dismiss this appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the máterials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process,
DISMISSED