Case Name: Wellela HIRPASSA, Individually and as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Brook T. Genet and for the use of R.B., a minor, and B.B., a minor, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY GOVERNMENT; Delvon Montue, CPL; Troy Wallace, CPL; Louis Williams, CPL; Thomas Hammill, CPL; Asmorem Berhe; Adrien Lyle Robinson, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-12-30
Citations: 406 F. App'x 739
Docket Number: No. 10-1828
Parties: Wellela HIRPASSA, Individually and as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Brook T. Genet and for the use of R.B., a minor, and B.B., a minor, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY GOVERNMENT; Delvon Montue, CPL; Troy Wallace, CPL; Louis Williams, CPL; Thomas Hammill, CPL; Asmorem Berhe; Adrien Lyle Robinson, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before DUNCAN, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 406
Pages: 739–739

Head Matter:
Wellela HIRPASSA, Individually and as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Brook T. Genet and for the use of R.B., a minor, and B.B., a minor, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY GOVERNMENT; Delvon Montue, CPL; Troy Wallace, CPL; Louis Williams, CPL; Thomas Hammill, CPL; Asmorem Berhe; Adrien Lyle Robinson, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 10-1828.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 14, 2010.
Decided: Dec. 30, 2010.
Wellela Hirpassa, Appellant Pro Se. Tonia Yvetta Belton-Gofreed, Associate County Attorney, Upper Marlboro, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before DUNCAN, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Wellela Hirpassa appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of the Defendants on Hirpassa's complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hirpassa v. Prince George's County, No. 8:09-cv-02631-RWT, 2010 WL 2730651 (D.Md. July 9, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.