Case Name: Orlando Rapheal CLARK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer HARRISON, Defendant-Appellee, and Boyd Bennett; Lawrence Solomon, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-08-06
Citations: 390 F. App'x 258
Docket Number: No. 10-6447
Parties: Orlando Rapheal CLARK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer HARRISON, Defendant-Appellee, and Boyd Bennett; Lawrence Solomon, Defendants.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 390
Pages: 258–258

Head Matter:
Orlando Rapheal CLARK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer HARRISON, Defendant-Appellee, and Boyd Bennett; Lawrence Solomon, Defendants.
No. 10-6447.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 27, 2010.
Decided: Aug. 6, 2010.
Orlando Rapheal Clark, Appellant Pro Se. James Philip Allen, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Ap-pellee.
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Orlando Rapheal Clark appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Clark v. Harrison, No. 5:08-ct-03114-D (E.D.N.C. Mar. 12, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.