Case Name: Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Respondent, v. Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1983-07-07
Citations: 59 N.Y.2d 1021
Docket Number: 
Parties: Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Respondent, v Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 59
Pages: 1021–1023

Head Matter:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Respondent, v Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company, Appellant.
Decided July 7, 1983
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Norman H. Dachs for appellant.
A. Paul Goldblum for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (93 AD2d 814). This being an action between carriers for a declaratory judgment as to the division of responsibility between them, the reasoning of Chrysler Leasing Corp. v Public Administrator, N. Y. County (85 AD2d 410) is not apposite.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons.