Case Name: FLOYD HAMLET, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada
Jurisdiction: Nevada
Decision Date: 1968-12-09
Citations: 84 Nev. 699
Docket Number: No. 5570
Parties: FLOYD HAMLET, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Nevada Reports
Volume: 84
Pages: 699–700

Head Matter:
FLOYD HAMLET, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.
No. 5570
December 9, 1968
447 P.2d 492
James D. Santini, Public Defender, and George D. Frame, Deputy Public Defender, Clark County, for Appellant.
Harvey Dickerson, Attorney General, George F. Franklin, Jr., District Attorney, and George H. Spizzirri, Deputy District Attorney, Clark County, for Respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION
Per Curiam:
We are asked to set aside the appellant's conviction for possession of heroin on the ground that the prosecutor referred to the fact that the appellant, at about the same time he was arrested for that crime, also was arrested for possession of narcotics paraphernalia, a separate and distinct offense. Such a reference was made by the prosecutor during his opening statement, and again during jury summation, each time without objection by defense counsel. When testimony was offered on the point, objection was interposed by defense counsel, sustained by the court, and the jury admonished to disregard. The evidence of appellant's guilt is overwhelming. In this context we are unable to find prejudicial error.
Affirmed.