Case Name: Clarence DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-03-29
Citations: 652 So. 2d 929
Docket Number: No. 94-1477
Parties: Clarence DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: BOOTH, LAWRENCE and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 652
Pages: 929–929

Head Matter:
Clarence DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 94-1477.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
March 29, 1995.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Stephen R. White, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Clarence Davis (Davis) appeals from his sentence, claiming his judgment and sentencing guidelines scoresheet were never corrected to reflect the fact that attempted armed robbery with a firearm is a second-degree rather than a first-degree felony. The State properly admitted the clerical error below, and admits the error on appeal. § 812.13(2)(a), 777.04(4)(d), Fla.Stat. (1993). Davis also contends the scoresheet incorrectly scored the charge that was nolle prossed as part of a negotiated plea agreement. While we agree with Davis' arguments on appeal, we note that these clerical errors do not affect the substance of his negotiated plea and sentence. Accordingly, we affirm Davis' judgment and sentence but remand with instructions that the clerical errors in the judgment and scoresheet be corrected.
BOOTH, LAWRENCE and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.