Case Name: UNITED STATES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alice WOODS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-06-05
Citations: 10 F. App'x 623
Docket Number: No. 00-10422; D.C. No. CR-97-00015-FRZ
Parties: UNITED STATES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alice WOODS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before PREGERSON, FERNANDEZ, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 10
Pages: 623–624

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alice WOODS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 00-10422.
D.C. No. CR-97-00015-FRZ.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 14, 2001.
Decided June 5, 2001.
Before PREGERSON, FERNANDEZ, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Alice Woods appeals from the revocation of her supervised release and the court's imposition of a 15 month sentence. Woods contends that the district court erred by ruling that the exclusionary rule did not apply to supervised release revocation hearings. Wood's contention is foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Hebert, 201 F.3d 1103 (9th Cir.2000). To the extent that Woods contends that Hebert was wrongly decided, we cannot reconsider or overrule the decision of a prior panel. See United States v. Gay, 967 F.2d 322, 327 (9th Cir.1992).
AFFIRMED.
. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.