Case Name: Lori HAHN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA N.A., Defendant-Appellee, Maria Loccisano, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-06-04
Citations: 607 F. App'x 55
Docket Number: No. 14-1454
Parties: Lori HAHN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA N.A., Defendant-Appellee, Maria Loccisano, Defendant.
Judges: PRESENT: ROBERT D. SACK, RICHARD C. WESLEY and PETER W. HALL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 607
Pages: 55–55

Head Matter:
Lori HAHN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA N.A., Defendant-Appellee, Maria Loccisano, Defendant.
No. 14-1454.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
June 4, 2015.
Eric M. Baum, Eisenberg &' Baum, LLP, New York, NY, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Alice A. Kokodis, Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP, Boston, MA, for Defendant-Appellee.
PRESENT: ROBERT D. SACK, RICHARD C. WESLEY and PETER W. HALL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
SUMMARY ORDER
Plaintiff Lori Hahn brought suit against her former employer, Bank of America ("BOA" or the "Bank"), under both Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq., and the New York State Human Rights Law ("NYSHRL"), N.Y. Exec. Law § 290, et seq., claiming the Bank discriminated against her on the basis of her national origin, created a hostile work environment, and retaliated against her. for her complaints to the Bank's human resources department. Following discovery, BOA moved for summary judgment and Hahn voluntarily dismissed her discrimination claim. In its March 31, 2014, Memorandum and Opinion, the magistrate judge granted summary judgment for BOA on Hahn's retaliation and hostile work environment claims. Hahn appeals that decision. We affirm for reasons stated by the magistrate judge in her Memorandum and Opinion.
We have considered all of Hahn's arguments and find them to be without merit. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment.