Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Claude T. YOUNG, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-05-20
Citations: 131 F. App'x 945
Docket Number: No. 04-4850
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Claude T. YOUNG, Jr., Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before LUTTIG and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 131
Pages: 945–945

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Claude T. YOUNG, Jr., Defendant—Appellant.
No. 04-4850.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 4, 2005.
Decided May 20, 2005.
Mary Lou Newberger, Federal Public Defender, Jonathan D. Byrne, Appellate Counsel, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. Kasey Warner, United States Attorney, Stephanie L. Ojeda, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before LUTTIG and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Claude T. Young, Jr., appeals the district court's order revoking his supervised release and imposing a thirty-day term of imprisonment to be followed by thirty-five months of supervised release. We have reviewed the parties' briefs and the joint appendix and find that the district court did not abuse its discretion in revoking Young's supervised release. See United States v. Pregent, 190 F.3d 279, 282 (4th Cir.1999) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Young, No. CR-97-144 (S.D.W.Va. Sept. 23, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED