Case Name: Ira H. LaFleur et ux. v. William Zelenko et al.
Court: Vermont Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Vermont
Decision Date: 1928-11-26
Citations: 101 Vt. 414
Docket Number: 
Parties: Ira H. LaFleur et ux. v. William Zelenko et al.
Judges: Present:. Watson, C. J., Powers, Slack, Moulton, and Chase, JJ.
Reporter: Vermont Reports
Volume: 101
Pages: 414–415

Head Matter:
Ira H. LaFleur et ux. v. William Zelenko et al.
November Term, 1928.
Present:. Watson, C. J., Powers, Slack, Moulton, and Chase, JJ.
Opinion filed November 26, 1928.
J ones & J ones for the defendants.
Wayne C. Bosworth and Ira H. LaFleur for the plaintiffs.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This is an appeal, together with a bill of exceptions therein, by the defendants from a decree under the mandate of this Court in LaFleur et ux. v. Zelenko et al., 101 Vt. 64, 141 Atl. 603. The appeal is based on the ground that no specific route of the right of way in question was designated therein. But as the decree seems to be in accordance with the mandate of this Court the exceptions are overruled, the appeal is dismissed, without prejudice however and without costs, and cause remanded.
Let the defendants, if so advised, apply to the court of chancery for such relief as they may be entitled to in accordance with the procedure marked out in Stevens v. McRae, 97 Vt. 76, 81-82, 122 Atl. 892.
By order of Court.