Case Name: Mayada RAYESS, Appellant, v. Joseph BITAR, Appellee.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2018-10-19
Citations: 254 So. 3d 1197
Docket Number: Case No. 5D18-1894
Parties: Mayada RAYESS, Appellant,
v.
Joseph BITAR, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 254
Pages: 1197–1197

Head Matter:
Mayada RAYESS, Appellant,
v.
Joseph BITAR, Appellee.
Case No. 5D18-1894
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Opinion filed October 19, 2018
Mayada Rayess, Orlando, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The former wife, Mayada Rayess, appeals the final judgment dissolving her marriage to the former husband, Joseph Bitar. Because we do not have a transcript of the proceedings below, we cannot address the former wife's contention that the trial court's decision on the issues of alimony and equitable distribution are without evidentiary support. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979). Thus, we must affirm unless the former wife can demonstrate that "fundamental error appears on the face of the appealed order." Murphy v. Murphy, 948 So.2d 864, 865 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007). The former wife has made no such showing in this case.
AFFIRMED.
ORFINGER, TORPY and HARRIS, JJ., concur.