Case Name: Mark David SWANN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William W. SONDERVAN, Commissioner of Corrections; Robert Kupec, Warden, Eastern Correctional Institution; George Kaloroumakis; Ronald Dryden; Captain Flag; Lieutenant Matthews, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-02-20
Citations: 3 F. App'x 153
Docket Number: No. 00-7634
Parties: Mark David SWANN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William W. SONDERVAN, Commissioner of Corrections; Robert Kupec, Warden, Eastern Correctional Institution; George Kaloroumakis; Ronald Dryden; Captain Flag; Lieutenant Matthews, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 3
Pages: 153–153

Head Matter:
Mark David SWANN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William W. SONDERVAN, Commissioner of Corrections; Robert Kupec, Warden, Eastern Correctional Institution; George Kaloroumakis; Ronald Dryden; Captain Flag; Lieutenant Matthews, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 00-7634.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 9, 2001.
Decided Feb. 20, 2001.
Mark David Swann, pro se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Sharon Stanley Street, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, MD, for appellees.
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Mark David Swann appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Swann v. Sondervan, No. CA-00-1705 (D.Md. Nov. 3, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.