Case Name: STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JACQUELINE AGNES PARSLOW
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 2000-10-24
Citations: 60 Conn. App. 533
Docket Number: AC 19523
Parties: STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JACQUELINE AGNES PARSLOW
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Appellate Reports
Volume: 60
Pages: 533–534

Head Matter:
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JACQUELINE AGNES PARSLOW
(AC 19523)
Landau, Zarella and O’Connell, Js.
Submitted on briefs September 11
officially released October 24, 2000
Kevin M. Johnson filed a brief for the appellant (defendant).
Mark S. Solak, state’s attorney, Lisa A. Riggione, senior assistant state’s attorney, and Roger Caridad, assistant state’s attorney, filed a brief for the appel-lee (state).

Opinion:
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
The defendant, Jacqueline Agnes Par-slow, appeals from the judgment of conviction of reckless endangerment in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-64 and criminal mischief in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-117. On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly denied her motion for judgment of acquittal because there was insufficient evidence to sustain the jury's verdict.
We have fully reviewed and considered the record and the parties' briefs. The appeal rests on fact-bound issues. The verdict of the jury is supported by the evidence and the inferences that reasonably may be drawn therefrom. See State v. Miller, 59 Conn. App. 406, 412, 757 A.2d 69 (2000). Having applied the appropriate standard of review, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The judgment is affirmed.