Case Name: Carey E. FAKES, Employee-Respondent, v. WHITTAKER CONSTRUCTION, INC., Employer-Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-02-26
Citations: 69 S.W.3d 141
Docket Number: No. ED 79826
Parties: Carey E. FAKES, Employee-Respondent, v. WHITTAKER CONSTRUCTION, INC., Employer-Appellant.
Judges: Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 69
Pages: 141–142

Head Matter:
Carey E. FAKES, Employee-Respondent, v. WHITTAKER CONSTRUCTION, INC., Employer-Appellant.
No. ED 79826.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Feb. 26, 2002.
Thomas B. Tobin, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
David S. Schmidt, O’Fallon, MO, for respondent.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The employer, Whittaker Construction, Inc., appeals from a worker's compensation award issued by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission.
The order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).