Case Name: THE TOWN OF KEARNY ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. THE MAYOR AND ALDERMEN OF JERSEY CITY ET AL., DEFENDANTS IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1910-06-20
Citations: 79 N.J.L. 599
Docket Number: 
Parties: THE TOWN OF KEARNY ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. THE MAYOR AND ALDERMEN OF JERSEY CITY ET AL., DEFENDANTS IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 79
Pages: 599–599

Head Matter:
THE TOWN OF KEARNY ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. THE MAYOR AND ALDERMEN OF JERSEY CITY ET AL., DEFENDANTS IN ERROR.
Argued March 15, 1910 —
Decided June 20, 1910.
On error to Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 49 Vroom 77.
Eor the plaintiffs in error, Robert H. McCarter, Edward Kenny and Gilbert Collins.
Eor the defendants in error, James B. Vredenburgh, Albert C. Wall and Warren Dixon.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Swayze in the Supreme Court.
We reserve, however, any expression of view upon the question whether Jersey City ivas, within the meaning of the act (Pamph. L. 1897, p. 232), the owner of water works. To that question the Supreme Court gave a negative answer. We find it unnecessary to deal with the question.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Garrison, Trenoi-iard, Bergen, Vooriiees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Gray, Dill, Congdon, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.