Case Name: William D. HOPPER and Elaine Hopper, his wife, Appellants, v. Michelle R. RENO and Susanne Reno, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2001-02-28
Citations: 778 So. 2d 1065
Docket Number: No. 4D99-1450
Parties: William D. HOPPER and Elaine Hopper, his wife, Appellants, v. Michelle R. RENO and Susanne Reno, Appellees.
Judges: WARNER, C.J., POLEN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 778
Pages: 1065–1065

Head Matter:
William D. HOPPER and Elaine Hopper, his wife, Appellants, v. Michelle R. RENO and Susanne Reno, Appellees.
No. 4D99-1450.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb. 28, 2001.
Rehearing Denied March 28, 2001.
Millard C. Glancy of Law Office of Millard C. Glancy, Coral Springs, for appellants.
David P. Pakula of Fazio, Dawson, Di-Salvo, Cannon, Abers, Podrecca & Fazio, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
As the jury found the accident at issue was not a legal cause of appellant's injury, the error, if any, in the jury instructions regarding the amount of damages was harmless. See § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (1999). The denial of the motion to amend to allege property damages is also harmless because the property damages had already been paid. See id.
Affirmed.
WARNER, C.J., POLEN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.