Case Name: Fidel Eladio DIAZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-11-05
Citations: 588 So. 2d 71
Docket Number: No. 91-1703
Parties: Fidel Eladio DIAZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and NESBITT, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 588
Pages: 71–71

Head Matter:
Fidel Eladio DIAZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 91-1703.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 5, 1991.
Fidel Eladio Diaz, in pro. per.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and NESBITT, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the summary denial of the defendant's motion for post-conviction relief because his motion is not in the prescribed form as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.987. Scott v. State, 464 So.2d 1171 (Fla.1985).
Affirmed without prejudice.