Case Name: Novella J. MCKEEVER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-03-15
Citations: 416 F. App'x 321
Docket Number: No. 10-1648
Parties: Novella J. MCKEEVER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 416
Pages: 321–322

Head Matter:
Novella J. MCKEEVER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 10-1648.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 10, 2011.
Decided: March 15, 2011.
Charles Henry Cuthbert, Jr., Cuthbert Law Offices, Petersburg, Virginia, for Appellant. Eric Kressman, Regional Chief Counsel, Stephen Giacchino, Supervisory Attorney, Ameenah Lloyd, Assistant Regional Counsel, Social Security Adminis tration, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Neil H. MacBride, United States Attorney, Robin Perrin Meier, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Novella J. McKeever appeals the district court's order affirming the Commissioner's decision to deny McKeever a period of disability and disability insurance benefits. We must uphold the decision to deny benefits if the decision is supported by substantial evidence and the correct law was applied. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2006); Johnson v. Barnhart, 484 F.3d 650, 653 (4th Cir.2005) (per curiam). We have thoroughly reviewed the parties' briefs, the administrative record, and the materials submitted in the joint appendix, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See McKeever v. Comm'r of Soc. See., No. 3:09-cv-00339-JRS, 2010 WL 1528562 (E.D. Va. April 14, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.