Case Name: Charles Anthony CAPO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1978-10-19
Citations: 363 So. 2d 410
Docket Number: No. JJ-449
Parties: Charles Anthony CAPO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SMITH, Acting C. J., ERVIN, J. and MASON, ERNEST E., Associate Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 363
Pages: 410–411

Head Matter:
Charles Anthony CAPO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. JJ-449.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Oct. 19, 1978.
Charles Anthony Capo, in pro. per., for appellant.
No appearance for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant seeks review of the summary denial of his motion to vacate, set aside or correct the judgment of conviction for battery of a law enforcement officer (Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.850). We agree with the trial court's conclusion that the allegations in the motion were insufficient to entitle appellant to an evidentiary hearing. Appellant's assertion that he was entitled to relief because of the alleged incompetency of his privately retained counsel is without merit. Such contention does not set forth a ground for post-conviction relief. See Cappetta v. Wainwright, 203 So.2d 609 (Fla.1967); Harden v. State, 352 So.2d 576 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); Crespo v. State, 339 So.2d 697 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). Similarly, appellant's contention that the trial judge was biased against him was insufficient to require an evidentiary hearing. See Wilson v. Renfroe, 91 So.2d 857 (Fla.1956). Accordingly, the order appealed from is AFFIRMED.
SMITH, Acting C. J., ERVIN, J. and MASON, ERNEST E., Associate Judge, concur.