Case Name: JEFFREY ROMANOWSKI, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TOWNSHIP OF BRICK, A BODY POLITIC AND CORPORATE IN LAW, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND ROBERT FORRESTER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TOWNSHIP OF BRICK, A BODY POLITIC AND CORPORATE IN LAW, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1983-11-22
Citations: 192 N.J. Super. 79
Docket Number: 
Parties: JEFFREY ROMANOWSKI, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TOWNSHIP OF BRICK, A BODY POLITIC AND CORPORATE IN LAW, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND ROBERT FORRESTER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TOWNSHIP OF BRICK, A BODY POLITIC AND CORPORATE IN LAW, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 192
Pages: 79–80

Head Matter:
JEFFREY ROMANOWSKI, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TOWNSHIP OF BRICK, A BODY POLITIC AND CORPORATE IN LAW, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND ROBERT FORRESTER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TOWNSHIP OF BRICK, A BODY POLITIC AND CORPORATE IN LAW, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Submitted September 19, 1983
Decided November 22, 1983.
Before Judges ARD, MORTON I. GREENBERG and TRAUT-WEIN.
Russo, Courtney & Foster, for appellant Township of Brick (Joseph L. Foster on the brief).
Shebell & Schibell, for respondent Jeffrey Romanowski (Raymond P. Shebell on the brief).
Novins, Farley, Grossman & York, for respondent Robert Forrester (Kenneth R. Pentony on the brief).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Havey in his opinion of February 8, 1982. 185 N.J.Super. 197 (Law Div.1982).
Affirmed.