Case Name: SUSSMAN, Appellant, v. ROSENBLUM, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1899-05-02
Citations: 58 N.Y.S. 1150
Docket Number: 
Parties: SUSSMAN, Appellant, v. ROSENBLUM, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 58
Pages: 1150–1150

Head Matter:
SUSSMAN, Appellant, v. ROSENBLUM, Respondent.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
May 2, 1899.)
Actiop by Sarah Sussman against James Rosenblum.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The present rule is that pleadings should be construed with reasonable liberality. So construed, we are of opinion that the counterclaim intended to charge an assault arising out oí the same affray for which the defendant is sued by the plaintiff. The interlocutory judgment should be affirmed, with costs to the respondent to abide the final event of the action.