Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Samuel E. BAKER, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-10-20
Citations: 333 F. App'x 894
Docket Number: No. 09-40358
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Samuel E. BAKER, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 333
Pages: 894–894

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Samuel E. BAKER, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-40358
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Oct. 20, 2009.
James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, H. Michael Sokolow, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Samuel E. Baker, Jr., raises arguments that under the law of the case doctrine are foreclosed. See United States v. Agofsky, 516 F.3d 280, 283 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 64, 172 L.Ed.2d 61 (2008). The appellant's unopposed motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.