Case Name: Ruben CARRAZANA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-05-15
Citations: 816 So. 2d 804
Docket Number: No. 3D01-2477
Parties: Ruben CARRAZANA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before LEVY, SORONDO and RAMIREZ, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 816
Pages: 804–804

Head Matter:
Ruben CARRAZANA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D01-2477.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 15, 2002.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Robert Kalter, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Linda S. Katz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before LEVY, SORONDO and RAMIREZ, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The state concedes that the judgment adjudicating defendant guilty of direct criminal contempt and sentence of incarceration failed to include a recital of the facts upon which the adjudication of guilt was based, as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.830. Accordingly, the convictions and sentences are vacated and the cause is remanded for the trial court, if it wishes, to conduct further proceedings in accordance with the rule. See Alvis v. State, 764 So.2d 859 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).