Case Name: Joe David BARNARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Billy Joe DURHAM, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-02-26
Citations: 88 F. App'x 641
Docket Number: No. 03-7899
Parties: Joe David BARNARD, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Billy Joe DURHAM, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 88
Pages: 641–642

Head Matter:
Joe David BARNARD, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Billy Joe DURHAM, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 03-7899.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 19, 2004.
Decided Feb. 26, 2004.
Joe David Barnard, Appellant pro se.
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Joe David Barnard appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Barnard v. Durham, No. CA-03-3321-6-20BI (D.S.C. Nov. 24, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade quately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED