Case Name: In the Matter of D. R. B., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. D. R. B., Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2013-03-20
Citations: 255 Or. App. 740
Docket Number: 11664MC; A150388
Parties: In the Matter of D. R. B., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. D. R. B., Appellant.
Judges: Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Sercombe, Judge, and Hadlock, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 255
Pages: 740–741

Head Matter:
Submitted February 1,
reversed March 20, 2013
In the Matter of D. R. B., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. D. R. B., Appellant.
Jackson County Circuit Court
11664MC; A150388
298 P3d 639
Susan D. Isaacs filed the brief for appellant.
Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General, and Jake J. Hogue, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Sercombe, Judge, and Hadlock, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Appellant seeks reversal of the trial court's judgment committing him as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. In his second assignment of error, he contends that the trial court erred in concluding that he is a danger to others as a result of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the record does not contain legally sufficient evidence to support the involuntary commitment and that the trial court's judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state's concession, and reverse on that basis. Accordingly, we do not address appellant's first and third assignments of error.
Reversed.
In particular, "the state concedes that the trial court erred in relying on [certain] hearsay statements for their truth, and basing its decision on those statements."