Case Name: ETHEL M. DORRANCE ET AL., PROSECUTORS-APPELLANTS, v. J. H. THAXER-MARTIN, STATE TAX COMMISSIONER, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1936-04-30
Citations: 116 N.J.L. 362
Docket Number: 
Parties: ETHEL M. DORRANCE ET AL., PROSECUTORS-APPELLANTS, v. J. H. THAXER-MARTIN, STATE TAX COMMISSIONER, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 116
Pages: 362–363

Head Matter:
ETHEL M. DORRANCE ET AL., PROSECUTORS-APPELLANTS, v. J. H. THAXER-MARTIN, STATE TAX COMMISSIONER, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Argued February 4, 1936 —
Decided April 30, 1936.
For the appellants, John Milton and William A. Schnader (of the Pennsylvania bar).
For the respondent, David T. Wilentz, Duane E. Minard and George S. Hobart.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion per curiam filed in the Supreme Court.