Case Name: The FLORIDA BAR RE: ADVISORY OPINION-Shore v. Wall, et al.
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2018-10-04
Citations: 265 So. 3d 447
Docket Number: No. SC17-1510
Parties: The FLORIDA BAR RE: ADVISORY OPINION-Shore
v.
Wall, et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 265
Pages: 447–456

Head Matter:
The FLORIDA BAR RE: ADVISORY OPINION-Shore
v.
Wall, et al.
No. SC17-1510
Supreme Court of Florida.
October 4, 2018
Kellie D. Scott, Chair, Jeffrey T. Picker, and William A. Spillias, Standing Committee on Unlicensed Practice of Law, Tallahassee, Florida, for Petitioner
Kevin P. Tynan of Richardson & Tynan, P.L.C., on behalf of Jupiter Asset Recovery, LLC and Jeffrey Paine, Tamarac, Florida; Amy L. Dilday, Starlett M. Massey, and Jonathan D. Kaplan of McCumber, Daniels, Buntz, Hartig, Puig, & Ross, P.A., on behalf of Global Discoveries, Ltd., Tampa, Florida, Responding

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
James Wall filed with the Standing Committee on the Unlicensed Practice of Law (Standing Committee) a request for issuance of an advisory opinion pursuant to the procedures set forth in Rule Regulating the Florida Bar 10-9.1 and this Court's opinion in Goldberg v. Merrill Lynch Credit Corp. , 35 So.3d 905 (Fla. 2010). In the request, Wall alleged that Jeffrey Paine and his company, Jupiter Asset Recovery, LLC (collectively "JAR"), engaged in the unlicensed practice of law in connection with JAR's attempt to recover surplus funds from the Manatee County Clerk of Court's registry on Wall's behalf. The Standing Committee held a public hearing where it considered live and written testimony, see Rule Regulating the Florida Bar 10-9.1(f), and ultimately filed with this Court a proposed advisory opinion concluding that JAR's conduct, as alleged by Wall and if taken as true, would constitute the unlicensed practice of law.
After the Standing Committee's proposed advisory opinion was filed, interested parties were permitted to file briefs in support of or in opposition to the proposed advisory opinion. See R. Regulating Fla. Bar 10-9.1(g)(3). JAR and Global Discoveries, Ltd., filed briefs in opposition to the proposed advisory opinion; the Standing Committee filed a response to the briefs. After considering the proposed opinion and the briefs of the interested parties, the Court approves the proposed advisory opinion as set forth in the appendix to this opinion.
It is so ordered.
PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, LABARGA and LAWSON, JJ., concur.
CANADY, C.J., dissents with an opinion.
We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const.; R. Regulating Fla. Bar 10-9.1(g).
References in the Appendix to TABS A, B, and C, are to the attachments to the proposed advisory opinion originally filed by the Standing Committee in this case on August 15, 2017.