Case Name: Roger B. SANDFORT and Roger E. Sandfort, Appellants, v. PHASE II EMERALD BAY CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Emerald Bay Amenities, Inc., and Patrick Schmickley, Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2017-06-06
Citations: 522 S.W.3d 912
Docket Number: WD 79755
Parties: Roger B. SANDFORT and Roger E. Sandfort, Appellants, v. PHASE II EMERALD BAY CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Emerald Bay Amenities, Inc., and Patrick Schmickley, Respondents.
Judges: Before Division One: Gary.D. Witt, Presiding Judge, Alok Ahuja, Judge and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judge
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 522
Pages: 912–912

Head Matter:
Roger B. SANDFORT and Roger E. Sandfort, Appellants, v. PHASE II EMERALD BAY CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Emerald Bay Amenities, Inc., and Patrick Schmickley, Respondents.
WD 79755
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Order filed: June 6, 2017
Cole D. Bradbury, Osage Beach, for Appellants.
Bradley C. Letterman, Jefferson City, for Respondents.
Before Division One: Gary.D. Witt, Presiding Judge, Alok Ahuja, Judge and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judge

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Roger E. Sandfort and Roger B. Sand-fort appeal- the circuit court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Emerald Bay Condominium Owners Association, Inc.; Emerald Bay Amenities, Inc.; and Patrick Schmickley. on the Sandforts' petition alleging malicious prosecution directed at a previously dismissed • civil suit. The uncontroverted facts establish that the Defendants relied on the advice of their counsel, and the grant of summary judgment is affirmed. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have instead provided a separate memorandum of law to the parties explaining our ruling. Affirmed Rule 84.16(b).