Case Name: Clyde MARTIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-11-15
Citations: 662 So. 2d 767
Docket Number: No. 95-0738
Parties: Clyde MARTIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: GLICKSTEIN, POLEN and KLEIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 662
Pages: 767–767

Head Matter:
Clyde MARTIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 95-0738.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Nov. 15, 1995.
Clyde Martin, Arcadia, pro se, appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Edward Giles, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appel-lee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Clyde Martin appeals the denial of his motion for relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We issued an order to the state to show cause why this case should not be reversed for further proceedings solely on the issue of whether appellant's counsel improperly waived his right to testify against his express wishes.
Considering the state's response and the record, we conclude that the response and the attachments to the trial court's order denying relief do not conclusively refute appellant's claim. We therefore reverse and remand for the trial court to either conduct an evidentiary hearing as to this issue, or attach portions of the record that show appellant is not entitled to relief.
REVERSED.
GLICKSTEIN, POLEN and KLEIN, JJ., concur.