Case Name: Marcel D. THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2016-01-20
Citations: 183 So. 3d 479
Docket Number: No. 4D14-1130
Parties: Marcel D. THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: WARNER, MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 183
Pages: 479–480

Head Matter:
Marcel D. THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D14-1130.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jan. 20, 2016.
Antony, P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, and Louis G. Carres,. Special Assistant Conflict Counsel, Office of. Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi', Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Laura Fisher, Assistant Attorney General, West'Palm Beach, for ap-pellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant challenges his sentence, arguing that the trial court's. written order, finding six violations of probation, does not match the court's oral pronouncement, which found only that Appellant "violated [probation] by .committing the criminal of fense of robbery with a firearm." "Where a trial court's written sentencing order conflicts with the oral pronouncement, the oral pronouncement controls." Santiago v. State, 133 So.3d 1159, 1167 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014). The State concedes that the written order does not match the oral pronouncement. As the written order finds violations of probation not included in the oral pronouncement, the written order must be corrected.
We affirm the imposition of costs, as these had been imposed in the original sentencing proceeding. The court did not have to orally impose them again at the sentencing for the violation of probation.
Affirmed and remanded for correction in conformance with the oral pronouncement.
WARNER, MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.
. As Appellant's other arguments lack merit, we decline to address them.