Case Name: The State ex rel. May, Appellant, v. Cissell, Clerk, et al., Appellees
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1995-08-09
Citations: 73 Ohio St. 3d 46
Docket Number: Nos. 95-546 and 95-547
Parties: The State ex rel. May, Appellant, v. Cissell, Clerk, et al., Appellees.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 73
Pages: 46–47

Head Matter:
The State ex rel. May, Appellant, v. Cissell, Clerk, et al., Appellees.
[Cite as State ex rel. May v. Cissell (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 46.]
(Nos. 95-546 and 95-547
Submitted June 21, 1995
Decided August 9, 1995.)
Morris May, pro se.
Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Christian J. Schaefer, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellees.

Opinion:
The judgments of the court of appeals dismissing the complaints for writs of mandamus are affirmed on the basis that appellant possesses an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law to correct the trial court records via App.R. 9(E). See State ex rel. Howard v. Ferreri (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 587, 592, 639 N.E.2d 1189, 1194-1195, and cases cited therein.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.