Case Name: Margie Ann ERNST, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Edward Paul ERNST, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-08-22
Citations: 910 S.W.2d 261
Docket Number: No. 66571
Parties: Margie Ann ERNST, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Edward Paul ERNST, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before PUDLOWSKI, P.J., and CRANDALL and KAROHL, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 910
Pages: 261–261

Head Matter:
Margie Ann ERNST, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Edward Paul ERNST, Defendant/Appellant.
No. 66571.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District.
Aug. 22, 1995.
Motions for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Sept. 25, 1995.
Application to Transfer Denied Dec. 19, 1995.
Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss Overruled Dec. 19, 1995.
Jeffrey S. Pauli, Clayton, for appellant.
Theodore S. Schechter, Michael L. Schechter, Philip E. Adams, Schechter & Watkins, P.C., Clayton, for respondent.
Before PUDLOWSKI, P.J., and CRANDALL and KAROHL, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal of the dissolution decree ending a twenty-eight year marriage. Husband challenges the division of property, maintenance award to wife and order requiring him to pay wife's attorneys fees. We have carefully considered the trial court's findings and the record and find no error. The lower court considered all of the relevant factors in deciding the issues and there is substantial evidence on the record to support its decision. Therefore, we discern no jurisprudential value in issuing an extended legal opinion. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been furnished with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order.