Case Name: McFall and Another v. Wilson and Others, in Error
Court: Supreme Court of Indiana
Jurisdiction: Indiana
Decision Date: 1842-11
Citations: 6 Blackf. 260
Docket Number: 
Parties: * McFall and Another v. Wilson and Others, in Error.
Judges: 
Reporter: Blackford
Volume: 6
Pages: 276–276

Head Matter:
* McFall and Another v. Wilson and Others, in Error.

Opinion:
TO a plea of failure of consideration, m a suit on a promissory note, a general replication that the consideration had not failed as alleged, is sufficient. Farmer v. Fairman, 5 Blackf., 257.
If the assignment of a patent right be not recorded in the office of the Secretary of State of the United States, a note given to the assignee for such right is invalid for the want of consideration. Higgins v. Strong et al., 4 Blackf., 182.
If a declaration on a promissory, note contain the common counts, and there be judgment by default- for the plaintiff^ there must be a writ of inquiry, unless the parties submit, the case to the Court, or a nolle prosequi be entered as to the common counts. , Wood v. Lemon, 1 Blackf., 198, note.
The same point was decided in Wingate v. Ellis, at this term.