Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony AALUND, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-01-27
Citations: 164 F. App'x 640
Docket Number: No. 05-30111
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Anthony AALUND, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: RAWLINSON and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges, and BURNS, District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 164
Pages: 640–640

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Anthony AALUND, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 05-30111.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 25, 2006.
Decided Jan. 27, 2006.
Earl Allan Hicks, Esq., Spokane, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Lana C. Glenn, Esq., Law Office of Lana C.C. Glenn, Spokane, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: RAWLINSON and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges, and BURNS, District Judge.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
The Honorable Lariy A. Bums, United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
We have jurisdiction to review the district court's consideration of Aalund's prior convictions for purposes of determining his criminal history category under the United States Sentencing Guidelines. See United States v. Dominguez, 316 F.3d 1054, 1056 (9th Cir.2003).
The district court did not err in considering Aalund's prior convictions in its criminal history calculation, because those convictions have not been reversed or expunged. See United States v. Guthrie, 931 F.2d 564, 571-573 (9th Cir.1991); see also United States v. Young, 988 F.2d 1002, 1004 (9th Cir.1998).
SENTENCE AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.