Case Name: Maria Dolores VASQUEZ, et al., Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-06-11
Citations: 234 F. App'x 532
Docket Number: No. 06-71769
Parties: Maria Dolores VASQUEZ, et al., Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 234
Pages: 532–532

Head Matter:
Maria Dolores VASQUEZ, et al., Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 06-71769.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 5, 2007.
Filed June 11, 2007.
Peter A. Hosharian, Esq., Law Office of Peter A. Hosharian, Montebello, CA, for Petitioners.
Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, William C. Erb, Jr., Esq., DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: LEAVY, RYMER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Maria Dolores Vasquez and her daughter Lourdes Jomaly Vasquez Barrios, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' adoption and affirmance of an immigration judge's denial of their application for cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review petitioners' challenge to the agency's discretionary hardship determination. Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir. 2005).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.