Case Name: George M. KUBSKI and Nayda Kubski, his wife, Appellants, v. Conrad W. SCHAEFER, et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1984-05-02
Citations: 448 So. 2d 1254
Docket Number: No. 83-912
Parties: George M. KUBSKI and Nayda Kubski, his wife, Appellants, v. Conrad W. SCHAEFER, et al., Appellees.
Judges: ANSTEAD, C.J., and LETTS and BERA-NEK, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 448
Pages: 1254–1255

Head Matter:
George M. KUBSKI and Nayda Kubski, his wife, Appellants, v. Conrad W. SCHAEFER, et al., Appellees.
No. 83-912.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
May 2, 1984.
Stephen R. Koons of McGee, Jordan, Shuey, Koons, Schroeder & Morris, Lake Worth, for appellants.
William G. Shofstall, Jr. of Casey & McBane, West Palm Beach, and Max Rud-mann of Martin Zevin, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. We are in no position to disturb the findings of fact of the trial judge made in the face of conflicting evidence as to the existence and extent of termite infestation in appellees' house and the related issue as to the valid cost of repair of any such damage. We also find no error by the trial court in allowing the appellee property owner to testify as to the existence and extent of termite infestation in the house.
ANSTEAD, C.J., and LETTS and BERA-NEK, JJ., concur.