Case Name: In the Matter of Laurel Convalescent Home, Inc., Appellant, v. County of Westchester, Department of Social Services, Defendant, and A. Harry Kupersmith, Respondent; A. Harry Kupersmith, Respondent, v. Laurel Convalescent Home, Inc., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1976-11-29
Citations: 54 A.D.2d 983
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Laurel Convalescent Home, Inc., Appellant, v County of Westchester, Department of Social Services, Defendant, and A. Harry Kupersmith, Respondent. A. Harry Kupersmith, Respondent, v Laurel Convalescent Home, Inc., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 54
Pages: 983–983

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Laurel Convalescent Home, Inc., Appellant, v County of Westchester, Department of Social Services, Defendant, and A. Harry Kupersmith, Respondent. A. Harry Kupersmith, Respondent, v Laurel Convalescent Home, Inc., Appellant.

Opinion:
In (1) a proceeding to fix an attorney's lien and (2) an action to recover for legal services, Laurel Convalescent Home, Inc., appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated April 6, 1976, which, after a nonjury trial, is in favor of respondent A. Harry Kupersmith and against it. Judgment affirmed, with costs. In view of the services rendered and the results achieved, the retainer agreement was not oppressive. The trial court was familiar with the quality of the services rendered; its conclusion as to the propriety of the fee is entitled to great weight. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Damiani and Titone, JJ., concur.