Case Name: Bernard McFADDEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Anthony J. PADULA, Warden; Charles M. Condon, Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-01-19
Citations: 2 F. App'x 251
Docket Number: No. 00-7465
Parties: Bernard McFADDEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Anthony J. PADULA, Warden; Charles M. Condon, Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 2
Pages: 251–252

Head Matter:
Bernard McFADDEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Anthony J. PADULA, Warden; Charles M. Condon, Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 00-7465.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 11, 2001.
Decided Jan. 19, 2001.
Bernard McFadden, pro se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, SC, for appellees.
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Bernard McFadden seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. McFadden v. Padula, No. CA-99-3933-324BC (D.S.C. Sept. 28, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.