Case Name: State ex rel. Ohio Heritage Dev. Co. v. Portage Cty. Bd. of Elections
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2000-10-24
Citations: 90 Ohio St. 3d 1446
Docket Number: 00-1830
Parties: State ex rel. Ohio Heritage Dev. Co. v. Portage Cty. Bd. of Elections.
Judges: Motee, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 90
Pages: 1446–1446

Head Matter:
Tuesday, October 24, 2000
MERIT DOCKET
00-1830.
State ex rel. Ohio Heritage Dev. Co. v. Portage Cty. Bd. of Elections.

Opinion:
In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition regarding an expedited election matter and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the writ of prohibition be, and hereby is, denied.
Motee, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Pfeifer, J., would deny the writ based on laches.