Case Name: State ex rel. Nicastro v. Stralka
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1999-01-04
Citations: 84 Ohio St. 3d 1456
Docket Number: 98-2710
Parties: State ex rel. Nicastro v. Stralka.
Judges: Douglas, Acting C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 84
Pages: 1456–1456

Head Matter:
Monday, January 4, 1999
MERIT DOCKET
98-2710.
State ex rel. Nicastro v. Stralka.

Opinion:
In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
Douglas, Acting C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Lundberg Stratton, J., concurs because prohibition is an improper remedy.
Cook, J., dissents and would grant an alternative writ.
Moyer, C.J., not participating.