Case Name: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald Charles BROCK, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-03-05
Citations: 5 F. App'x 708
Docket Number: No. 00-50067; D.C. No. CR-99-390-HLH
Parties: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald Charles BROCK, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before LEAVY, THOMAS, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 5
Pages: 708–709

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald Charles BROCK, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 00-50067.
D.C. No. CR-99-390-HLH.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 12, 2001.
Decided March 5, 2001.
Before LEAVY, THOMAS, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Donald Charles Brock appeals his conviction, pursuant to a guilty plea, and sen tence for mail fraud, and aiding and abetting in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1841 and 2. Brock's attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and has moved to withdraw as counsel of record. Brock did not file a pro se supplemental brief. Having conducted an independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we conclude that there are no arguable appellate issues. Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is
AFFIRMED.
. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.