Case Name: William F. Barclay, respondent, v. Charles Roome Parmele Company, appellant
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1907-01-02
Citations: 71 N.J. Eq. 769
Docket Number: 
Parties: William F. Barclay, respondent, v. Charles Roome Parmele Company, appellant.
Judges: For affirmance—Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Eeed, Trenohard, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill—14.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 71
Pages: 769–769

Head Matter:
William F. Barclay, respondent, v. Charles Roome Parmele Company, appellant.
[Argued June 26th, 1906.
Decided January 2d, 1907.]
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery, advised by Vice-Chancellor Emery, whose opinion is reported in 70 N. J. Fq. (J/. Robb.) @18.
iliessrs. Guild, hum & Tamblyn and Mr. Arthur A. Mickell (of the New York bar), for the appellant.
Messrs. Goult, Howell & Sm,iih and Mr. Henry W. Goodrich, for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:.
The decree of the court of chancery is affirmed, for the reasons given by Vice-Chancellor Emery in the court below.
For affirmance—Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Eeed, Trenohard, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill—14.
For reversal—None.