Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Daniel Davis, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2015-04-22
Citations: 127 A.D.3d 1104
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Daniel Davis, Appellant.
Judges: Eng, P.J., Dillon, Chambers and Barros, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 127
Pages: 1104–1104

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Daniel Davis, Appellant.
[5 NYS3d 890]

Opinion:
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cohen, J.), rendered April 22, 2013, convicting him of burglary in the third degree and criminal mischief in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the testimony of a police officer impermissibly bolstered the complainant's testimony (see People v Trowbridge, 305 NY 471 [1953]) is without merit (see People v Brown, 120 AD3d 710 [2014]; People v Santiago, 265 AD2d 351, 352 [1999]).
The defendant's contention that the verdict was repugnant is unpreserved for appellate review, as he failed to raise this issue before the jury was discharged (see People v Alfaro, 66 NY2d 985, 987 [1985]; People v Boley, 116 AD3d 965, 966 [2014]; People v Jackson, 101 AD3d 1153 [2012]; People v Shamsiddeen, 98 AD3d 694 [2012]). In any event, this contention is without merit (see People v Dorvilier, 122 AD3d 642 [2014]).
Eng, P.J., Dillon, Chambers and Barros, JJ., concur.