Case Name: Frank J. GARLAND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ernest LEVERING, c/o Balto Stevedore; David P. Hartman; David Hartman, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-05-26
Citations: 380 F. App'x 299
Docket Number: No. 10-1100
Parties: Frank J. GARLAND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ernest LEVERING, c/o Balto Stevedore; David P. Hartman; David Hartman, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 380
Pages: 299–300

Head Matter:
Frank J. GARLAND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ernest LEVERING, c/o Balto Stevedore; David P. Hartman; David Hartman, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 10-1100.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 20, 2010.
Decided: May 26, 2010.
Frank J. Garland, Appellant Pro Se. Michael J. Collins, Michael J. Collins, PC, Highland, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Frank J. Garland appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to Ernest Levering and David P. Hartman on Garland's claim of race discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Garland v. Levering, No. l:09-cv-00941-RDB, 2010 WL 148322 (D.Md. Jan. 12, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.