Case Name: Makez KIMBLE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2009-05-26
Citations: 283 S.W.3d 311
Docket Number: No. ED 91962
Parties: Makez KIMBLE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before: KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., MARY HOFF, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 283
Pages: 311–312

Head Matter:
Makez KIMBLE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 91962.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern Distinct, Division Four.
May 26, 2009.
Gwencla Renee’ Robinson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Mary H. Moore, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before: KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., MARY HOFF, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Makez Kimble, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance of counsel by misinforming him regarding the sentence he would receive.
The motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for them information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).