Case Name: Norman FREEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; R. Blocker, Medical Doctor; Rosario, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-10-02
Citations: 332 F. App'x 926
Docket Number: No. 08-8451
Parties: Norman FREEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; R. Blocker, Medical Doctor; Rosario, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 332
Pages: 926–927

Head Matter:
Norman FREEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; R. Blocker, Medical Doctor; Rosario, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 08-8451.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 29, 2009.
Decided: Oct. 2, 2009.
Norman Freeman, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Norman Freeman appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), and the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2671-2680 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the order of the district court. See Freeman v. United States, No. 9:07-cv-03431-TLW, 2008 WL 4831772 (D.S.C. Oct. 31, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.