Case Name: Cleveland SANDERS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-08-20
Citations: 107 F. App'x 357
Docket Number: No. 04-6979
Parties: Cleveland SANDERS, Petitioner—Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 107
Pages: 357–357

Head Matter:
Cleveland SANDERS, Petitioner—Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 04-6979.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 12, 2004.
Decided Aug. 20, 2004.
Cleveland Sanders, Appellant pro se. Susan Rawls Edwards, Nexsen Pruett, Columbia, South Carolina; T. Lowndes Pope, Roy F. Laney, Riley, Pope & Laney, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Cleveland Sanders appeals the district court's orders accepting the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying his motions for a preliminary injunction and default judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sanders v. South Carolina Dep't of Corr., No. CA-03-1127-6-25AK (D.S.C. May 24, 2004); Sanders v. South Carolina Dep't of Corr., No. CA-03-1127-6-25AK (D.S.C. filed March 24, 2004 & entered March 25, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED