Case Name: Matteo Nania, Respondent, v. Metropolitan Transit Authority et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2015-01-29
Citations: 124 A.D.3d 552
Docket Number: 
Parties: Matteo Nania, Respondent, v Metropolitan Transit Authority et al., Appellants.
Judges: Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Friedman, Andrias, Gische and Kapnick, JJ.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 124
Pages: 552–552

Head Matter:
Matteo Nania, Respondent, v Metropolitan Transit Authority et al., Appellants.
[998 NYS2d 634]—

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (George J. Silver, J.), entered August 20, 2013, which granted plaintiffs motion for reargument and, upon reargument, denied defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Under the circumstances presented, where the parties offered conflicting versions as to how the accident occurred, the court properly found that triable issues of fact and credibility precluded the dismissal of the action (see Odikpo v American Tr., Inc., 72 AD3d 568 [1st Dept 2010]; Elamin v Roberts Express, 290 AD2d 291 [1st Dept 2002]).
We have considered defendants' remaining arguments and find them unavailing.
Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Friedman, Andrias, Gische and Kapnick, JJ.