Case Name: Abe Frank, Doing Business as A. B. Frank, Respondent, v. Pennsylvania Railroad, Appellant, et al., Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1962-04-12
Citations: 35 Misc.2d 179
Docket Number: 
Parties: Abe Frank, Doing Business as A. B. Frank, Respondent, v. Pennsylvania Railroad, Appellant, et al., Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 35
Pages: 179–179

Head Matter:
Abe Frank, Doing Business as A. B. Frank, Respondent, v. Pennsylvania Railroad, Appellant, et al., Defendant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
April 12, 1962.
BleaMey, Platt, Schmidt, Hart & Fritz (Dennis P. Donovan and Michael J. Shalley of counsel), for appellant. Zelman <& Zelman (Benjamin M. Zelman of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
It was an improvident exercise of discretion to deny an application for interrogatories to obtain essential testimony of two witnesses residing outside the State when the defendant found that they would not appear for trial as anticipated.
The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and motion granted.
Concur — Hoestadter, J. P., Gold and Capozzoli, JJ.
Order reversed, etc.