Case Name: Joseph KIRZHNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PUREPOWER TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-04-15
Citations: 566 F. App'x 239
Docket Number: No. 13-2285
Parties: Joseph KIRZHNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PUREPOWER TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before KING, GREGORY, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 566
Pages: 239–240

Head Matter:
Joseph KIRZHNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PUREPOWER TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 13-2285.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 31, 2014.
Decided: April 15, 2014.
Joseph Kirzhner, Appellant Pro Se. Jade Cobb Murray, Littler Mendelson PC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before KING, GREGORY, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Joseph Kirzhner appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to PurePOWER Technologies LLC on his complaint asserting violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. § 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2006 & Supp. 2013). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Krizhner v. PurePOWER Technologies LLC, No. 3:12-cv-01802-MBS (D.S.C. Sept. 23, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.