Case Name: Angeline WASHICK, Petitioner, v. MAISEL'S ARTHUR RESTAURANT and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1964-04-15
Citations: 162 So. 2d 899
Docket Number: No. 33227
Parties: Angeline WASHICK, Petitioner, v. MAISEL’S ARTHUR RESTAURANT and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
Judges: DREW, C. J., and THORNAL, O’CON-NELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 162
Pages: 899–900

Head Matter:
Angeline WASHICK, Petitioner, v. MAISEL’S ARTHUR RESTAURANT and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
No. 33227.
Supreme Court of Florida.
April 15, 1964.
Richard A. Sicking and Kaplan, Ser, Abrams & O’Malley; Miami, for petitioner.
Berson, Barnes, & Inman, Orlando, for Maisel’s Arthur Restaurant; Patrick H. Mears and Paul E. Speh, Tallahassee, for Florida Industrial Commission, respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida In dustrial Commission bearing date November 27, 1963.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
DREW, C. J., and THORNAL, O'CON-NELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.