Case Name: Darlene Lackey HALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORTH CAROLINA, State of; Alexander County Sheriffs Department; Richard Talbert Hall; Ricky Minton; Sara Elizabeth Mecimore; Western Piedmont Council of Governments; Alexander County Department of Social Services; Cleda Graham; Steven J. Jolly; Deborah B. Jolly; Caldwell County Sheriffs Department, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-11-25
Citations: 302 F. App'x 224
Docket Number: No. 08-1726
Parties: Darlene Lackey HALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORTH CAROLINA, State of; Alexander County Sheriffs Department; Richard Talbert Hall; Ricky Minton; Sara Elizabeth Mecimore; Western Piedmont Council of Governments; Alexander County Department of Social Services; Cleda Graham; Steven J. Jolly; Deborah B. Jolly; Caldwell County Sheriffs Department, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 302
Pages: 224–224

Head Matter:
Darlene Lackey HALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORTH CAROLINA, State of; Alexander County Sheriffs Department; Richard Talbert Hall; Ricky Minton; Sara Elizabeth Mecimore; Western Piedmont Council of Governments; Alexander County Department of Social Services; Cleda Graham; Steven J. Jolly; Deborah B. Jolly; Caldwell County Sheriffs Department, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 08-1726.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 20, 2008.
Decided: Nov. 25, 2008.
Darlene Lackey Hall, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Darlene Lackey Hall appeals the district court's order summarily dismissing her complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000) for failure to state a claim, for lack of jurisdiction, and as frivolous. In her informal appellate brief, Hall failed to challenge the district court's reasons supporting the denial of relief. Accordingly, Hall has waived appellate review of those issues. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b) ("The Court will limit its review to the issues raised in the informal brief."). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.