Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Randall J. BEMIS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-06-09
Citations: 184 F. App'x 627
Docket Number: No. 05-35199
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Randall J. BEMIS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: CANBY, T.G. NELSON and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 184
Pages: 627–628

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Randall J. BEMIS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-35199.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 5, 2006.
Filed June 9, 2006.
Stephen Gunnels, AUSA, Eugene, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Randall J. Bemis, Sheridan, OR, pro se.
Before: CANBY, T.G. NELSON and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
We have reviewed the opening brief. This appeal is appropriate for summary disposition under Ninth Circuit Rule 3-6 because appellant challenges his sentence based on United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), but Booker does not apply to cases on collateral review. United States v. Cruz, 423 F.3d 1119, 1120-21 (9th Cir.2005) (per curiam).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.