Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Dominique JOHNSON, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2013-11-05
Citations: 412 S.W.3d 914
Docket Number: No. ED 98447
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Dominique JOHNSON, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before LISA S. VAN AMBURG, P.J., PATRICIA L. COHEN, J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, JR.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 412
Pages: 914–915

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Dominique JOHNSON, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 98447.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Nov. 5, 2013.
Edward Thompson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Karen Kramer, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before LISA S. VAN AMBURG, P.J., PATRICIA L. COHEN, J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, JR.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Dominique Johnson appeals from the judgment entered upon a jury's verdict convicting him of first-degree robbery, section 569.020, RSMo (2000), and armed criminal action, section 571.015, RSMo (2000). On appeal, Johnson contends the trial court plainly erred in failing to: (1) redact from the evidence submitted to the jury references to an additional robbery in a tape of the police interrogation of Defendant and (2) read Jury Instructions Nos. 1 and 2 at the commencement of trial. We find no plain error and affirm.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).