Case Name: PHILADELPHIA DRESS JOINT BOARD, an Unincorporated Association by William Ross, Trustee Ad Litem, Affiliated with the International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, v. Jesse J. ROSINSKY, Individually and Trading as H. H. Rosinsky & Company, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1956-01-19
Citations: 229 F.2d 438
Docket Number: No. 11717
Parties: PHILADELPHIA DRESS JOINT BOARD, an Unincorporated Association by William Ross, Trustee Ad Litem, Affiliated with the International Ladies’ Garment Workers’ Union, v. Jesse J. ROSINSKY, Individually and Trading as H. H. Rosinsky & Company, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 229
Pages: 438–438

Head Matter:
PHILADELPHIA DRESS JOINT BOARD, an Unincorporated Association by William Ross, Trustee Ad Litem, Affiliated with the International Ladies’ Garment Workers’ Union, v. Jesse J. ROSINSKY, Individually and Trading as H. H. Rosinsky & Company, Appellant.
No. 11717.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued Jan. 12, 1956.
Decided Jan. 19, 1956.
James L. Price, Philadelphia, Pa., (Richman, Price & Jamieson, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.
M. Herbert Syme, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee.
Before MARIS, KALODNER and STALEY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This was a suit under section 9 of title 9, United States Code, to enforce an award rendered in an arbitration proceeding between the parties. The defendant's motion to dismiss the action was properly denied by the district court upon the authority of Tenney Engineering, Inc., v. United Electrical Radio & Machine Workers of America, 3 Cir., 1953, 207 F.2d 450. Subsequently the district court entered judgment for the plaintiff and the defendant appeals. We have examined the defendant's contentions raised on this appeal and find them to be without merit. They are fully discussed in the opinion of the district court filed by Judge Lord, 134 F.Supp. 607, and we are in agreement with what is there said. No further discussion of them here is necessary.
The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.