Case Name: Luke Holland v. State
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1936-03-03
Citations: 123 Fla. 142
Docket Number: 
Parties: Luke Holland v. State.
Judges: Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Buford, and Davis, J. J., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 123
Pages: 142–143

Head Matter:
Luke Holland v. State.
166 So. 468.
Opinion Filed March 3, 1936.
H. V. McClellan, for Plaintiff in Error;
Cary D. Landis, Attorney General, and Roy Campbell, Assistant, for the State.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
In this case the indictment charged manslaughter in two counts, viz.: (1) by culpable negligence in operating an automobile; (2) in operating an automobile while intoxicated. The jury found the defendant guilty on the second count. While the evidence tends strongly to sus tain the charge of culpable negligence in the first count, the evidence does not prove that the defendant committed the unlawful act tuhile intoxicated under the second count of the indictment. As' the effect of the verdict is to acquit the defendant on the first count and as the evidence does not prove the charge stated in the second count of the indictment, the judgment should be and is reversed for a new trial on the second count of the indictment.
It is so ordered.
Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Buford, and Davis, J. J., concur.
Ellis, P. J., and Brown, J., dissent.