Case Name: KEATOR v. WHITTAKER et al.
Court: Supreme Court of Texas
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1912-02-07
Citations: 143 S.W. 607
Docket Number: 
Parties: KEATOR v. WHITTAKER et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 143
Pages: 607–610

Head Matter:
KEATOR v. WHITTAKER et al.
(Supreme Court of Texas.
Feb. 7, 1912.)
1. Statutes (§ 251 ) — Time Effective — Emergency Clause.
House Bill No. 25, enacted in 1911, creating the Seventh Judicial District, passed on April 3, 1911, became effective on June 9, 1911, notwithstanding the emergency clause.
[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Statutes, Cent. Dig. § 332; Dec. Dig. § 251. ]
2. Courts (§ 52 ) — Transfer of Jurisdiction.
House Bill No. 25, enacted in 1911, creating the Seventh Judicial District for the Court of Civil Appeals out of counties partially theretofore embraced in the Second District, by section 4 provides that the clerk of the Court of Civil Appeals of the Second Judicial District shall, after the act takes effect, prepare and certify transcripts of all orders in the cases then pending in the Second Court of Civil Appeals, taken there by appeal or writ of error from the courts of any of the counties named in section 1, which cases have not theretofore been submitted to the Second Court of Civil Appeals. E'eld, that the statute transferred jurisdiction of all cases unsubmitted to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Second District from counties in the Seventh District to the Court of Civil Appeals of that district at once upon going into effect without any action 'by the clerk of the Court of Civil Appeals of the Second District or by that court; the clerk’s duties in transferring the papers only being ministerial.
[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Courts, Cent. Dig. §§ 18A-192; Dee. Dig. § 52. ]
3. Couets (§ 52 ) — Jurisdiction—Transfer of Cases — Creation of New Districts.
Held, further, that the statute conferred upon the Court of Civil Appeals for the Seventh District jurisdiction of all unsubmitted cases appealed to the court for the Second District from any county embraced in the Seventh District, as well as jurisdiction of cases in Which appeals had been perfected to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Second District, which had not been filed in said court.
[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Courts, Cent. Dig. §§ 184-192; Dec. Dig. § 52. ]
4. Courts (§ 52 ) — Transfer of Jurisdic-tio n — Transcript.
Held, further, that, since the Court of Civil Appeals of the Seventh District had jurisdiction immediately upon the statute becoming operative, the record should be filed in that court, and not in the Court of Civil Appeals for the Second District, though notice of appeal to that court had been filed when the act took effect.
[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Courts, Cent. Dig. §§ 184-192; Dec. Dig. § 52. ]
5. Courts (§ 52 ) — Transfer -of Causes.
Held, further, that though, after the statute took effect, the records of causes theretofore appealed to the Second District should not be filed in that court, but in the court for the Seventh District, the clerk of the court for the Second District could send the papers to the court, for the Seventh District for filing within the time allowed by law for their filing in the proper court; there being no necessity for the court for the Second District to strike the papers from the record.
[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Courts, Cent.' Dig. §§ 184-192; Dec. Dig. § 52. ]
6. Courts (§ 52 ) — Transfer of Jurisdiction — Appeal Bond.
Held, further, that, if an appeal was perfected to the Court of Civil Appeals of the Second District before the statute took effect, the appeal bond and other papers should be framed with reference to that court, and, if not filed therein before the statute took effect, the records should be filed in the court for the Seventh District, and treated as if transferred thereto from the Second District.
[Ed. Note. — F'or other cases, see Courts, Cent. Dig. §§ 184^-192; Dec. Dig. § 52. ]
7. Courts (§ 52 ) — Jurisdiction—Transfer of Causes.
Held, further, that, since the court for the Seventh District had jurisdiction over cases first filed in the court for the Second District and transmitted to it and of cases appealed to the court for the Second District, the record of which was filed in the court for the Seventh District within the proper time, the court for the Seventh District had jurisdiction to hear excuses for not filing a statement of facts in that court within the time required by law.
[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Courts, Cent. Dig. §§ 184-192; Dec. Dig. § 52. ]
Certified Questions from Court of Civil Appeals of Seventh Supreme Judicial District
Action by F. Y. Keator against John A. Whittaker and another. On certified questions to the Supreme Court
Questions answered as stated.
H. B. White and Madden, Trulove & Kim-brough, for plaintiff in error. Cooper, Merrill & Lumpkin and A. T. Cole, for defendants in error.
For other cases see same topic ana section NUMBER in Dec. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key No. Series & Rep’r indexes
For other cases see same topic and section NUMBER in Dec. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key No. Series & Rep’r Indexes

Opinion:
BROWN, C. J.
The Thirty-Second Legislature enacted a statute by which the Seventh District for the Courts of Civil Appeals was created and the organization of a court for that district was provided for, which bill took effect June 9, 1911. The district is composed largely of counties, which were previously embraced in the second district.
This suit was tried in the county court of Donley county, which was then in the second district, and judgment was rendered, and appellant gave notice of appeal to the Court of Civil Appeals of the Second District, executing bond for appeal to that court May 25, 1911. The transcript was prepared and delivered to appellant on June 10, 1911. On July 31, 1911, the appellant filed transcript and briefs in the Court of Civil Appeals of the Seventh District within the time required by law. On September 11th the ap-pellee filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, which the court sustained (140 S. W. 120), and dismissed the appeal, because it had no jurisdiction of the case.
The act which created the seventh district contains this provision: "See. 4. That the clerk of the Court of Civil Appeals of the Second Supreme Judicial District shall, after this act takes effect, forthwith prepare and certify transcripts of all orders in cases then pending in said Second Court of Civil Appeals taken there by appeal or writ of error from the courts of any of the counties named in the first section of this act, which cases have not theretofore been submitted to said Second Court of Civil Appeals," etc.
The honorable Court of Civil Appeals certified to this court these questions:
Question 1: "Did House Bill No. 25 become operative upon its passage or only upon the expiration of 90 days after adjournment of the Legislature? In other words, is the emergency clause of the bill .effective?"
Answer: The bill took effect on June 9, 1911. It became a law on the 3d of April of that year.
Question 2: "Did House Bill No. 25, upon 'becoming operative, by its own force and effect, transfer the jurisdiction of the cases covered by the fourth section thereof to this court? Or did the jurisdiction' remain in the Court of Civil Appeals for the Second District until the clerk of that court performed the duties required of him in the act?
Answer: When it went into effect, the bill transferred the jurisdiction of all un-submitted cases from counties in the Seventh District to the Court of Civil Appeals of that district. The clerk performed only a ministerial act by transmitting the papers.
Question 3: "In this case, the record never having- been filed in the Court of Civil Appeals for the Second District, and no orders ever having been made in it by that court, was there anything to be done by that court or the clerk thereof before jurisdiction attached in this court?"
Answer: No.
Question 4: "Was the jurisdiction in all cases from the counties named in the first section of the act in which notice of-appeal had been given and appeal bond -.filed in the court below, or in which a writ of error had been sued out and writ of error bond filed in the court below prior to the taking effect of the act, and which had not been submitted in said Court of Civil Appeals for the Second District, transferred to this court, or was the jurisdiction transferred only in those cases in which the record had been filed or some motion or application filed in the Court of Civil Appeals for the Second District, invoking some action by it, before the act became operative?"
Answer: The effect of the fourth section of the law, when it went into effect, was to transfer to and confer upon the Court of Civil Appeals of the Seventh District jurisdiction of all unsubmitted eases that had been appealed from any county embraced in the Seventh District; also jurisdiction of all causes in any of said counties in which appeals had been taken and perfected to the said Court of Civil Appeals for the Second District which had not been filed in said court.
Question 5: "Was the jurisdiction of this case after the act became operative in this court, or in the Court of Civil Appeals for the Second District? If in the Second District, what remained to be done before the jurisdiction of this court attached?"
Answer: In the Court of Civil Appeals of the Seventh District.
Question 6: "If this court had jurisdiction of this cause upon the act becoming operative without anything more, did that jurisdiction toll the record so as to require the transcript and statement of facts to be filed in this court? Or was it necessary to file the transcript and statement of facts in the Court of Civil Appeals for the Second District and be transferred?"
Answer: The record and statement of facts should have been filed in the Court of Civil Appeals of the Seventh District. The effect of the act was to put such cases in the same attitude as if they had been filed in the Court of the Second District and transmitted by the clerk thereof to the Court of Seventh District after the act creating the latter court went into effect. It was not necessary that the record should be filed in the.court of-the Second District.
Question 7: "If, after the jurisdiction of this court attached, the transcript or statement of facts or brief or other documents were filed in the Court of Civil Appeals for the Second District, had that court or the clerk thereof any authority to transfer them to this court, so as to make it the duty of this court to receive and file them, or should that court have stricken them out and left the parties to bring them here for the original filing on proper showing?"
Answer: After the law took effect, there was no authority for filing such record in the Court of the Second District, but the clerk of that court might send the papers to the court of the Seventh District, and, if such papers were received and filed in the latter court within the time allowed by law for filing them in the proper court, that would be sufficient. There was no need of any action by the court of Second District.
Question 8: "Because of the language above quoted and which appears in the notice of appeal in this cause, as well as in the body of the appeal bond, was the appeal rendered inoperative, or was the appeal perfected to the proper court of civil appeals by said notice and the filing and approval of said bond?"
Answer: If an appeal was perfected to the Court of Civil Appeals of the Second District before the law took effect, it was proper to frame the bond and other, papers and record with reference to that court, and, if not filed before the act in question took effect, the record should be filed in the court of the Seventh District within the time prescribed by law, and should be treated as if it had been transferred from the Second District.
Question 9: "If it should be held that, after House Bill No. 25 became operative, because of its provisions, the Court of Civil Appeals for the Second District was deprived of all further jurisdiction in causes appealed from the counties named in the first section of that act, except those that had been submitted in the Court of Civil Appeals for the Second District prior to said act becoming operative, has this court the power to hear and determine excuses for not having filed in this court within the proper time a statement of facts, which may not have been filed in this court within 90 days after perfecting the appeal?"
Answer: The court of Seventh District had and has full and complete jurisdiction over cases first filed in the Court of the Second District and then transmitted to the Court of the Seventh District and of cases which were appealed to the former court, but the record filed in proper time in the latter court, and should hear any motion just as if the ease had been-first filed in that court. The Legislature intended to transfer from the Second to the Seventh Court of Civil Appeals all unsubmitted eases pending In tlie former court appealed from counties embraced in tbe Seventh District, and tbe law should be construed so as to effect that purpose. This is not like the case of Gordon et al. v. Rhodes & Daniels (Civ. App.) 104 S. W. 786. The Legislature made no provision in creating the Sixth District for transferring cases pending in other courts. The direction in this law to the clerk to transfer all cases unsubmitted by irresistible implication made the transfer of all such cases.