Case Name: THELMA DOUGHTY, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. TUNG-SOL ELECTRIC, INC., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1964-12-14
Citations: 43 N.J. 512
Docket Number: 
Parties: THELMA DOUGHTY, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. TUNG-SOL ELECTRIC, INC., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Judges: For affirmance — Chief Justice WeiNTRAub, and Justices Jaoobs, FkaNcis, Proctok and SohettiNo — 5.
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 43
Pages: 512–513

Head Matter:
THELMA DOUGHTY, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. TUNG-SOL ELECTRIC, INC., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Argued November 17, 1964
Decided December 14, 1964.
Mrs. Sonia Napolitano argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Pindar, McElroy, Connell & Foley, attorneys).
Mr. Louis C. Jacobson argued the cause for the respondent.

Opinion:
Pee CuhiAM.
We granted certification to review the judgment of the Appellate Division reversing the judgment of the County Court and adjudging that Workmen's Compensation benefits be paid to the employee.
The issue is wholly factual and ultimately turned upon conflicting medical testimony. After considering all of the circumstances we are not persuaded that we should disturb the judgment of the Appellate Division and it accordingly is affirmed.
For affirmance — Chief Justice WeiNTRAub, and Justices Jaoobs, FkaNcis, Proctok and SohettiNo — 5.
For reversal — Justices Haul and HaNEMAN — 2.