Case Name: City of Paterson, complainant-respondent, v. East Jersey Water Company, defendant-appellant
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1910-11-14
Citations: 77 N.J. Eq. 588
Docket Number: 
Parties: City of Paterson, complainant-respondent, v. East Jersey Water Company, defendant-appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 77
Pages: 588–588

Head Matter:
City of Paterson, complainant-respondent, v. East Jersey Water Company, defendant-appellant.
[Argued July 6th and 7th, 1910.
Decided November 14th, 1910.]
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Emery, whose opinion is reported in 74 N. J. Eq. (4 Buch.) 49.
Mr. Thomas F. Medran, for the respondent.
Messrs. Collins & Corbin, for the appellant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed bjr Vice-Chancellor Emery in the court below.
For affirmance — The Chirp-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Voohhees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgb, Vroom, Dill — 12.
For reversal — None.