Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Larry Dane BOYKIN, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-04-18
Citations: 686 F. App'x 267
Docket Number: No. 16-41096 Conference Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Larry Dane BOYKIN, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before KING, HAYNES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 686
Pages: 267–267

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Larry Dane BOYKIN, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
No. 16-41096 Conference Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed April 18, 2017
Milton Andrew Stover, Esq., U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Texas, Plano, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Larry Dane Boykin, Jr., Pro Se
Before KING, HAYNES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Larry Dane Boykin, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Boy-kin has filed a response, but he did not challenge the validity of his appeal waiver. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Boykin's response. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.