Case Name: Khadirah Ma'at T. EL-BEY; Asaru Alim N.T. El-Bey, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF RALEIGH POLICE DEPARTMENT; J.S. Varnell; David Shelton; A.J. Moser; M.J. Corso, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-11-17
Citations: 453 F. App'x 384
Docket Number: No. 11-2026
Parties: Khadirah Ma’at T. EL-BEY; Asaru Alim N.T. El-Bey, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF RALEIGH POLICE DEPARTMENT; J.S. Varnell; David Shelton; A.J. Moser; M.J. Corso, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 453
Pages: 384–385

Head Matter:
Khadirah Ma’at T. EL-BEY; Asaru Alim N.T. El-Bey, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF RALEIGH POLICE DEPARTMENT; J.S. Varnell; David Shelton; A.J. Moser; M.J. Corso, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 11-2026.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 15, 2011.
Decided: Nov. 17, 2011.
Khadirah Ma’at T. El-Bey and Asaru Alim N.T. El-Bey, Appellants Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Khadirah Ma'at T. El-Bey and Asaru Alim N.T. El-Bey appeal the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing their complaint as untimely. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. El-Bey v. Raleigh Police Dep't, No. 5:11-cv-00275-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 22, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.