Case Name: Steven M. Paris et al., Respondents, v. Carl N. Reiss, Doing Business as CNR Commercial & Residential Services, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1997-09-30
Citations: 242 A.D.2d 979
Docket Number: 
Parties: Steven M. Paris et al., Respondents, v Carl N. Reiss, Doing Business as CNR Commercial & Residential Services, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 242
Pages: 979–979

Head Matter:
Steven M. Paris et al., Respondents, v Carl N. Reiss, Doing Business as CNR Commercial & Residential Services, Appellant.
[664 NYS2d 697]

Opinion:
Motion to extend time to perfect appeal denied with leave to renew on or before October 30, 1997, upon an affidavit demonstrating a reasonable excuse for the delay and an intent to perfect the appeal within a reasonable time. Memorandum: 22 NYCRR 1000.13 (f) provides that, in support of a motion to extend the time to perfect an appeal, "the appellant shall submit an affidavit demonstrating a reasonable excuse for the delay and an intent to perfect the appeal within a reasonable time." The affidavit of counsel stating merely that the parties have agreed to an extension does not comport with 22 NYCRR 1000.13 (f). Present—Pine, J. P., Law-ton, Hayes, Wisner and Balio, JJ.