Case Name: NATHAN ROSENBERG, APPELLANT, v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1926-04-01
Citations: 102 N.J.L. 724
Docket Number: 
Parties: NATHAN ROSENBERG, APPELLANT, v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 102
Pages: 724–724

Head Matter:
NATHAN ROSENBERG, APPELLANT, v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, RESPONDENT.
Argued February 4, 1920
Decided April 1, 1926.
For the appellant, Kalisch & Kalisch.
For the respondent, Frank G. Turner.

Opinion:
Pee Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme' Court.
For affirmance — Trenchard, Kalisch, Katzenbach, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.