Case Name: Thurman Rudolph GOODMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. A. ELLSWORTH, Shift Sergeant/CEO; A. Jones, Floor Deputy; A. Hills, Medical CEO, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-02-16
Citations: 121 F. App'x 532
Docket Number: No. 04-7668
Parties: Thurman Rudolph GOODMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. A. ELLSWORTH, Shift Sergeant/CEO; A. Jones, Floor Deputy; A. Hills, Medical CEO, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 121
Pages: 532–533

Head Matter:
Thurman Rudolph GOODMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. A. ELLSWORTH, Shift Sergeant/CEO; A. Jones, Floor Deputy; A. Hills, Medical CEO, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 04-7668.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 9, 2005.
Decided: Feb. 16, 2005.
Thurman Rudolph Goodman, Appellant pro se.
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Thurman Rudolph Goodman appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Goodman v. Ellsworth, No. CA-04-579, 2005 WL 361879 (E.D.Va. Oct. 6, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED