Case Name: Michael E. ALLEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. A.A. LAMARQUE; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-03-20
Citations: 32 F. App'x 393
Docket Number: No. 01-16133; D.C. No. CV-01-00341-MMC
Parties: Michael E. ALLEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. A.A. LAMARQUE; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 32
Pages: 393–393

Head Matter:
Michael E. ALLEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. A.A. LAMARQUE; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
No. 01-16133.
D.C. No. CV-01-00341-MMC.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 11, 2002.
Decided March 20, 2002.
Before CANBY, BEEZER, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Michael E. Allen, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's judgment dismissing his action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for failure to state a claim. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.2000), and affirm, see Frost v. Agnos, 152 F.3d 1124, 1130 (9th Cir.1998); Sanchez v. Vild, 891 F.2d 240, 242 (9th Cir. 1989).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.