Case Name: COCKRELL v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1950-02-22
Citations: 227 S.W.2d 216
Docket Number: No. 24637
Parties: COCKRELL v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 227
Pages: 216–216

Head Matter:
COCKRELL v. STATE.
No. 24637.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Feb. 22, 1950.
H. J. Brice, Snyder,, C. C. McDonald, Wichita Rails, for appellant.
George P. .Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
•. HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.
Conviction ;was for driving a motor vehicle on a public .highway in-.Scurry County while intoxicated. A jury found appellant guilty and assessed the punishment at a fine of $500.00.
Prosecution was by complaint and information, both of which were filed on June 11, 1949. The-offense is alleged to have occurred on June 11, 1949. There is no- allegation in the information that the offense was committed, before the information was filed. This defect is fatal. The trial -court should have sustained appellant's motion to quash the information. See Art. 414, C.C. P., Sub. 6; Branch's Ann.Tex.P.C., Sec. .433, p. 230 and cases cited therein; Phariss v. State, 136 Tex.Cr.R. 504, 126 S.W.2d 981; Id., 137 Tex.Cr.R. 98, 128 S.W.2d 415; Cobb v. State, 139 Tex.Cr.R. 337, 139 S.W.2d 272; Hoot v. State, 149 Tex.Cr.R. 316, 194 S.W.2d 97; Martini v. State, 150 Tex.Cr.R. 155, 199 S.W.2d 784; Id., Tex.Cr.App., 205 S.W.2d 988.
Tlie complaint is not subject to the defect pointed out in the information. If the State so desires a new information based on the complaint could be filed. Under the record as it now appears it is imperative that the judgment bé reversed and the cause remanded, with the further order that the prosecution -be dismissed under the present information.