Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. WALTER FRED McPHERSON Appellant
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1968-07-24
Citations: 250 Or. 601
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. WALTER FRED McPHERSON Appellant.
Judges: Before Perry, Chief Justice and Sloan and Goodavin, Justices.
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 250
Pages: 601–602

Head Matter:
Argued July 12,
affirmed July 24, 1968
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. WALTER FRED McPHERSON Appellant.
444 P. 2d 5
Allen L. Fallgren, Hillsboro, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Brink & Moore, Hillsboro.
Richard Smurthwaite, District Attorney, Hillsboro, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.
Before Perry, Chief Justice and Sloan and Goodavin, Justices.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this appeal we are asked to re-examine our decision in State v. Carlton, 1963, 233 Or 296, 378 P2d 557, in respect to a thief being charged with receiving and concealing stolen property. We decline to do so. In this case the indictment was charged in the conjunctive. "Proof of any one of the acts charged was sufficient to make out the offense." State v. Soasey, 1964, 237 Or 167, 171, 390 P2d 190, 192. There was such proof in the case.
Judgment affirmed.