Case Name: Joseph Lee McFADDEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jerry GAINEY, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-04-30
Citations: 520 F. App'x 176
Docket Number: No. 13-6208
Parties: Joseph Lee McFADDEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jerry GAINEY, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before AGEE and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 520
Pages: 176–177

Head Matter:
Joseph Lee McFADDEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jerry GAINEY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 13-6208.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 25, 2013.
Decided: April 30, 2013.
Joseph Lee MeFadden, Appellant Pro Se. David Cornwell Holler, Lee Erter Wilson Holler & Smith, LLC, Sumter, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before AGEE and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Joseph Lee McFadden appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McFadden v. Gainey, No. 4:12-cv-01470-MGL, 2013 WL 427328 (D.S.C. Feb. 4, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.