Case Name: Bradford TYNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1978-11-06
Citations: 363 So. 2d 1165
Docket Number: No. KK-419
Parties: Bradford TYNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SMITH, Acting C. J., and ERVIN and MELVIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 363
Pages: 1165–1165

Head Matter:
Bradford TYNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. KK-419.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nov. 6, 1978.
Bradford Tyner, in pro. per.
No appearance for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appeal from a denial of a motion to vacate a judgment and sentence, pursuant to Rule 3.850, Fla.R.Crim.P. Appellant contends that a substitute judge sentenced him without becoming familiar with the case and that, therefore, the sentence is invalid.
This issue could have been raised on direct appeal and, thus, cannot be raised with a motion to vacate or set aside a judgment and conviction. Von Eberstein v. State, 270 So.2d 444 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972). Accordingly, the order of the trial court is AFFIRMED.
SMITH, Acting C. J., and ERVIN and MELVIN, JJ., concur.