Case Name: Smith & Reilay against Hudson
Court: New York Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1823-10
Citations: 1 Cow. 430
Docket Number: 
Parties: Smith & Reilay against Hudson.
Judges: 
Reporter: Cowen's Reports
Volume: 1
Pages: 430–430

Head Matter:
Smith & Reilay against Hudson.
Where the sheriff, upon a Ji. fa. sold 3 Emdf3 but in the¡ certificate mistake!1 omitted to mention parcels^ the^ court ordered hi™certificate! according to the fact.
The Sheriff of Rensselaer, under a fi. fa. issued in this ’ J f . cause, had sold three parcels of land, belonging to the defendant, to Reilay, one of the plaintiffs, but in the certificate of sale which he had made and filed,, by-mistake, had omitted to mention one of these parcels.

Opinion:
T/tc Court, on motion, in behalf of Reilay, ordered the Sheriff to amend his certificate, by inserting therein, that he had also sold the parcel omitted,
R.ule accordingly.