Case Name: Edward Charles SCHLEGEL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1968-04-09
Citations: 208 So. 2d 835
Docket Number: No. 67-618
Parties: Edward Charles SCHLEGEL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 208
Pages: 835–835

Head Matter:
Edward Charles SCHLEGEL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 67-618.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
April 9, 1968.
Rehearing Denied May, 1, 1968.
Bernard A. Wieder, Miami Beach, for appellant.
Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen. and Arthur L. Rothenberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellant was convicted in the Criminal Court of Record of leaving the scene of an accident resulting in personal injury and property damage. His contention here is that the evidence was not sufficient to identify him as the driver of the automobile involved. We consider the evidence of identity to be sufficient. See Hyman v. State, 152 Fla. 446, 12 So.2d 437 (1943). See also the principle set forth in Beck v. State, 142 Fla. 524, 195 So. 143 (1940).
Affirmed.