Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Daniel Ernest ACOSTA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-06-19
Citations: 473 F. App'x 374
Docket Number: No. 11-50529
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Daniel Ernest ACOSTA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 473
Pages: 374–374

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Daniel Ernest ACOSTA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-50529
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
June 19, 2012.
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Graham Baker, Esq., Law Office of Graham Baker, P.L.L.C., San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Daniel Ernest Acosta has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Acosta has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.