Case Name: Irving Frankel, Respondent, v. Peerless Sugar Co., Inc., Respondent, and City of New York, Defendant-Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1943-10-22
Citations: 181 Misc. 5
Docket Number: 
Parties: Irving Frankel, Respondent, v. Peerless Sugar Co., Inc., Respondent, and City of New York, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 181
Pages: 5–5

Head Matter:
Irving Frankel, Respondent, v. Peerless Sugar Co., Inc., Respondent, and City of New York, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
October 22, 1943.
Ignatius M. Wilkinson, Corporation Counsel (Daniel A. Riordan of counsel), for defendant-appellant.
Edythe Widdi for plaintiff-respondent.
Charles G. Hill for defendant-respondent.

Opinion:
Memorandum
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed, with twenty-five dollars costs. Appeal from judgment in favor of the defendant Peerless $ugar Co., Inc., dismissed.
The judgment in favor of the defendant Peerless Sugar Co., Inc., is not appealable by the defendant City of New York. (Price v. Ryan, 255 N. Y. 16; Ward v. Iroquois Gas Corp., 258 N. Y. 124; Epstein v. National Transportation Co., 287 N. Y. 456.)
MacCratb, MoCooiy and Steinbrink, JJ., concur.