Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Omar HERNANDEZ-CABRERA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-07-31
Citations: 42 F. App'x 923
Docket Number: No. 01-10478; D.C. No. CR-01-00161-ROS
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Omar HERNANDEZ-CABRERA, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 42
Pages: 923–923

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Omar HERNANDEZ-CABRERA, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 01-10478.
D.C. No. CR-01-00161-ROS.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 22, 2002.
Decided July 31, 2002.
Before BROWNING, KOZINSKI, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Omar Hernandez-Cabrera appeals from his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Hernandez-Cabrera's has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating there are no arguable issues for review and seeking to withdraw as counsel of record. Hernandez-Cabrera has not filed a pro se supplemental brief. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no issues for review. Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.