Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darryl Glen RILEY, a/k/a Kendu, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-02-03
Citations: 675 F. App'x 363
Docket Number: No. 16-7408
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darryl Glen RILEY, a/k/a Kendu, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 675
Pages: 363–363

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darryl Glen RILEY, a/k/a Kendu, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-7408
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: January 31, 2017
Decided: February 3, 2017
Darryl Glen Riley, Appellant Pro Se. Heather Hart Mansfield, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Darryl Glen Riley appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Riley's motion. See United States v. Smalls, 720 F.3d 193, 195 (4th Cir. 2013). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. United States v. Riley, No. 3:98-cr-00101-HEH-1 (E.D. Va. Sept. 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED