Case Name: Lawrence DIGGS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BALTIMORE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Defendant-Appellee, and Baltimore County; Kevin Kamenetz, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-06-13
Citations: 654 F. App'x 131
Docket Number: No. 15-2298
Parties: Lawrence DIGGS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BALTIMORE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Defendant-Appellee, and Baltimore County; Kevin Kamenetz, Defendants.
Judges: Before AGEE, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 654
Pages: 131–132

Head Matter:
Lawrence DIGGS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BALTIMORE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Defendant-Appellee, and Baltimore County; Kevin Kamenetz, Defendants.
No. 15-2298
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 19, 2016
Decided: June 13, 2016
' Lawrence Diggs, Appellant Pro Se. Edmund J. O’Meally, Andrew G. Scott, Pessin Katz Law, P.A., Towson, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before AGEE, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Lawrence Diggs appeals the district court's order granting Baltimore County Public Schools' motion' for summary judgment and closing his civil action that raised claims of employment discrimination, hostile work environment, and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. § 621-634 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Diggs v. Bd. of Educ. of Baltimore Cty., No. 1:14-cv-00715-RDB, 2015 WL 5604278 (D. Md. Sept. 23, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.