Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Franklin Ternoois, III, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2017-06-09
Citations: 151 A.D.3d 1779
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Franklin Ternoois, III, Appellant.
Judges: Present — Garni, J.P., Curran, Troutman, Winslow and Scudder, JJ.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 151
Pages: 1779–1780

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Franklin Ternoois, III, Appellant.
[53 NYS3d 868]

Opinion:
Appeal from a judgment of the Wayne County Court (Dennis M. Kehoe, J.), rendered September 23, 2014. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of sexual abuse in the first degree.
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of sexual abuse in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.65 [3]), defendant contends that County Court abused its discretion in denying his request to adjudicate him a youthful offender. We reject that contention. " The determination . . . whether to grant . . . youthful offender status rests within the sound discretion of the court and depends upon all the attending facts and circumstances of the case' " (People v Dawson, 71 AD3d 1490, 1490 [2010], lv denied 15 NY3d 749 [2010]). Here, the record reflects that the court considered the relevant facts and circumstances in denying defendant's request. Significantly, the record establishes that defendant twice violated the terms of interim probation that the court imposed between the time of the plea and sentencing (see People v Lewis, 128 AD3d 1400, 1401 [2015], lv denied 25 NY3d 1203 [2015]; People v Kocher, 116 AD3d 1301, 1301-1303 [2014]). We therefore conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's request.
Present — Garni, J.P., Curran, Troutman, Winslow and Scudder, JJ.