Case Name: Walter Delaney BOOKER, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M. E. ENGELKE, Director of Food Services; N. Gregg, State Dietitian; H. Ponton, Regional Administrator, Western; L. Fleming, Warden; M. Broyles, Fomb; Q. Reynolds, Unit Manager; J. Combs, Assistant Warden; Bryant, Sergeant; Chow Hall Officers, C and D side; Witt, Correctional Officer; M. Elam, Regional Administrator, Western, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-10-12
Citations: 669 F. App'x 166
Docket Number: No. 16-6428
Parties: Walter Delaney BOOKER, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M. E. ENGELKE, Director of Food Services; N. Gregg, State Dietitian; H. Ponton, Regional Administrator, Western; L. Fleming, Warden; M. Broyles, Fomb; Q. Reynolds, Unit Manager; J. Combs, Assistant Warden; Bryant, Sergeant; Chow Hall Officers, C and D side; Witt, Correctional Officer; M. Elam, Regional Administrator, Western, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 669
Pages: 166–167

Head Matter:
Walter Delaney BOOKER, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M. E. ENGELKE, Director of Food Services; N. Gregg, State Dietitian; H. Ponton, Regional Administrator, Western; L. Fleming, Warden; M. Broyles, Fomb; Q. Reynolds, Unit Manager; J. Combs, Assistant Warden; Bryant, Sergeant; Chow Hall Officers, C and D side; Witt, Correctional Officer; M. Elam, Regional Administrator, Western, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-6428
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted; September 22, 2016
Decided: October 12, 2016
Walter Delaney Booker, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Before AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Walter Delaney Booker, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a preliminary injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the motion for injunctive relief and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Booker v. Engelke, No. 7:16-cv-00084-JLK-RSB (W.D. Va. Mar. 2, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this eourt and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED