Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesus GAXIOLA-PERALTA, aka Candelario Rios-Castro, aka Jesus Gaxiola, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-06-17
Citations: 134 F. App'x 219
Docket Number: No. 04-10197; D.C. No. CR-03-02085-CKJ
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesus GAXIOLA-PERALTA, aka Candelario Rios-Castro, aka Jesus Gaxiola, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KLEINFELD, TASHIMA, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 134
Pages: 219–220

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesus GAXIOLA-PERALTA, aka Candelario Rios-Castro, aka Jesus Gaxiola, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 04-10197.
D.C. No. CR-03-02085-CKJ.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 14, 2005.
Decided June 17, 2005.
Fred W. Slaughter, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Thomas E. Higgins, Jr., Esq., Law Offices of Thomas E. Higgins Jr., Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before KLEINFELD, TASHIMA, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Jesus Gaxiola-Peralta appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 55-month sentence for re-entry into the United States after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Gaxiola-Peralta has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Gaxiola-Peralta has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief.
Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and, in light of the valid appeal waiver contained in the plea agreement, this appeal is DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.