Case Name: Candy Ann TURBEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2004-10-28
Citations: 884 So. 2d 1157
Docket Number: No. 1D02-5192
Parties: Candy Ann TURBEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: POLSTON, J., Concurs; ERVIN, J., Dissents with opinion.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 884
Pages: 1157–1160

Head Matter:
Candy Ann TURBEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D02-5192.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Oct. 28, 2004.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Anne H. Dunlap, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Charles A. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Charlie McCoy, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
BARFIELD, J.
In this appeal Candy Ann Turben contends she was set up by the prosecutor to answer a question in such a manner as to allow the introduction of evidence not otherwise admissible against her. She asserts that the question asked, when considered in the context of the interrogation on cross examination, should have been viewed differently by the trial judge. This was a discretionary call with which we will not interfere.
AFFIRMED.
POLSTON, J., Concurs; ERVIN, J., Dissents with opinion.