Case Name: Arturo PEREZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1997-06-18
Citations: 695 So. 2d 851
Docket Number: No. 95-2651
Parties: Arturo PEREZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before LEVY and GODERICH, JJ., and BARKDULL, Senior Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 695
Pages: 851–852

Head Matter:
Arturo PEREZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 95-2651.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
June 18, 1997.
Arturo Perez, in proper person.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Keith S. Kromash, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before LEVY and GODERICH, JJ., and BARKDULL, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
Corrected Opinion
PER CURIAM.
On motion for clarification, the previous opinion of this court filed April 16, 1997, is vacated and withdrawn, and the corrected opinion is substituted.
As the State properly concedes, because the defendant's prosecutions for armed burglary and grand theft were not commenced within the appropriate statute of limitations period, the judgments and sentences for these counts must be vacated. Maguire v. State, 453 So.2d 438, 440 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).
The remaining point raised by the defendant lacks merit. Therefore, the defendant's remaining convictions are affirmed.
Affirmed, in part; vacated, in part, and remanded.