Case Name: In re the ADOPTION OF O.A.A. B.S.H. and M.H., Respondents, v. J.A. (Natural Father), Appellant A.C. (Mother), Defendant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-11-01
Citations: 174 S.W.3d 718
Docket Number: No. WD 64988
Parties: In re the ADOPTION OF O.A.A. B.S.H. and M.H., Respondents, v. J.A. (Natural Father), Appellant A.C. (Mother), Defendant.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. ULRICH, P.J., PATRICIA A. BRECKENRIDGE and JAMES M. SMART, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 174
Pages: 718–718

Head Matter:
In re the ADOPTION OF O.A.A. B.S.H. and M.H., Respondents, v. J.A. (Natural Father), Appellant A.C. (Mother), Defendant.
No. WD 64988.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Nov. 1, 2005.
Gerald F. McGonagle, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant.
Pamela S. Garrison, Kansas City, MO, Guardian Ad Litem for Respondent, O.A.A.
Sanford P. Krigel, Kansas City, MO, for Respondents, B.S.H. and M.H.
Before ROBERT G. ULRICH, P.J., PATRICIA A. BRECKENRIDGE and JAMES M. SMART, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
J.A. appeals the judgment terminating his parental rights with O.A.A., J.A.'s natural daughter, and granting O.A.A.'s adoption by B.S.H. and M.H., husband and wife, Respondents. On appeal, J.A. argues that the trial court erred in terminating his parental rights pursuant to section 211.447.4(2)(d) because clear, cogent, and convincing evidence that he failed to provide adequate support and care for O.A.A. was not presented.
For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).