Case Name: Rush v. Atlanta Railway and Power Company, and vice versa
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1902-03-12
Citations: 114 Ga. 949
Docket Number: 
Parties: Rush v. Atlanta Railway and Power Company, and vice versa.
Judges: All the Justices concurring, except Little, J., absent.
Reporter: Georgia Reports
Volume: 114
Pages: 949–949

Head Matter:
Rush v. Atlanta Railway and Power Company, and vice versa.
Submitted February 17,
Decided March 12, 1902.
Action for damages. Before Judge Calhoun. City court of Atlanta. July 1, 1901.
Peter F. Smith, for plaintiff. Payne & Tye, for defendant.

Opinion:
Xewis, J.
The grounds of the motion for a new trial containing special assignments of error were not approved by the trial judge. The alleged newly discovered evidence, even if not impeaching in character, was not such as to authorize this court to interfere with the discretion of the court below in overruling the motion for a new trial. The evidence fully warranted the verdict, and the court did not err in refusing to set the same aside.
Judgment on main bill of exceptions affirmed ; cross-bill dismissed.
All the Justices concurring, except Little, J., absent.