Case Name: Louis Stieglitz, Respondent, v. Milo M. Belding, Jr., Appellant
Court: New York City Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1897-04
Citations: 20 Misc. 714
Docket Number: 
Parties: Louis Stieglitz, Respondent, v. Milo M. Belding, Jr., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 20
Pages: 714–714

Head Matter:
Louis Stieglitz, Respondent, v. Milo M. Belding, Jr., Appellant.
Appeal-from a judgment-in favor of'plaintiff, and from order denying á-motion for a new trial. - ' '•' : '.
Lexow, Mackellar & Wells, for appellant.
Cardoza & Nathan, for respondent.

Opinion:
Fitzsimons, J.
The demurrer was properly sustained, Knoor v. Bates, 12 Misc. Rep. 396; 14 id. 501; Ralli v. Hillyer, 15 id. 692.
The order and judgment appealed from is, therefore, affirmed, with costs to-the respondent.
McCarthy and Oonlan, JJ., concur,"
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.