Case Name: Manhattan Novelty Corp. v. United States
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1967-07-03
Citations: 59 Cust. Ct. 595
Docket Number: R.D. 11328
Parties: Manhattan Novelty Corp. v. United States
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Volume: 59
Pages: 595–596

Head Matter:
(R.D. 11328)
Manhattan Novelty Corp. v. United States
(Decided July 3, 1967)
Lane, Young & Fox for tie plaintiff.
Carl Eardley, Acting Assistant Attorney General, for tie defendant.

Opinion:
Ford, Judge:
The proper value for dutiable purposes of certain tape recorders covered by the above appeals for a reappraisement is before the court for determination.
The parties hereto have entered into a stipulation of fact wherein it has been agreed as follows:
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise covered by the above appeals for reap-praisement consists of tape recorders exported from J apan subsequent to February 27,1958.
That said tape recorders are not identified in the Final List published by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54521, effective February 27, 1958; and that the said merchandise was entered for consumption subsequent to February 27,1958.
That on or about the date of exportation of the said merchandise, the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold, or, in the absence of sales, offered for sale in the principal markets of J apan, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, was the appraised value, less the buying commission, as stated on the invoices.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the above appeals for reappraisement may be submitted for decision upon this stipulation.
Upon the record before the court, I find and hold that export value as that value is defined in section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956,91 Treas. Dec. 295, T.D. 54165, is the proper basis of value for the tape recorders in issue and that said value is the appraised value, net packed, less the buying commission, as stated on the invoices.
Judgment will be entered accordingly.