Case Name: Jorge Armando DAVILA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2012-02-15
Citations: 80 So. 3d 423
Docket Number: No. 2D11-2021
Parties: Jorge Armando DAVILA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: WALLACE, KHOUZAM, and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 80
Pages: 423–424

Head Matter:
Jorge Armando DAVILA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D11-2021.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Feb. 15, 2012.
Grisel Ybarra, Miami, for Appellant.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Jorge Armando Davila appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm. See Barrios-Cruz v. State, 63 So.3d 868 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011). As in Barrios-Cruz, 63 So.3d at 870, we hold that Padilla v. Kentucky, - U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), does not apply retroactively in postconviction proceedings, and we certify to the Florida Supreme Court the following question of great public importance pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(a)(2)(A)(v):
SHOULD THE RULING IN Padilla v. Kentucky, - U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), BE APPLIED RETROACTIVELY IN POSTCONVICTION PROCEEDINGS?
Affirmed; question certified.
WALLACE, KHOUZAM, and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.