Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Walter McKinney, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1981-06-22
Citations: 82 A.D.2d 895
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Walter McKinney, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 82
Pages: 895–895

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Walter McKinney, Appellant.

Opinion:
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Rosenblatt, J.), rendered August 21,1979, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third and seventh degrees, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. The defendant failed to preserve for review the error claimed in the jury charge with respect to agency. We therefore find the alleged error to have been waived (see People v Darrisaw, 49 NY2d 786; People v Benoit, 72 AD2d 648). We see no reason to consider the claim of error in the interest of justice. The defendant concedes the diligent efforts made by the People to locate the informer, whose disappearance was not attributable to the People. He has failed, however, to demonstrate that the missing informer, a longtime friend, would have provided material and relevant testimony tending to exculpate the defendant. As a result, his claim that dismissal of the indictment is required is without foundation (see People v Maneiro, 49 NY2d 769; People v Santiago, 44 NY2d 924; People u Jenkins, 41 NY2d 307). Mollen, P.J., Hopkins, Titone and Weinstein, JJ., concur.