Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Said Hibrahim, Also Known as Saverino Perez, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2000-03-27
Citations: 270 A.D.2d 499
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Said Hibrahim, Also Known as Saverino Perez, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 270
Pages: 499–499

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Said Hibrahim, Also Known as Saverino Perez, Appellant.
[706 NYS2d 342]

Opinion:
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Flug, J.), rendered April 30, 1997, convicting him of burglary in the second degree and criminal mischief in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the fingerprint which linked him to the burglary established his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and excluded every hypothesis of innocence (see, People v Sparacino, 150 AD2d 814).
The defendant's contention that the jury charge constituted reversible error is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v DeJesus, 245 AD2d 298), and we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.
The defendant's sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Santucci, J. P., Joy, Goldstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.