Case Name: In re Application of Carr-Williams
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1992-06-10
Citations: 63 Ohio St. 3d 752
Docket Number: No. 91-2406
Parties: In re Application of Carr-Williams.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 63
Pages: 752–753

Head Matter:
In re Application of Carr-Williams.
[Cite as In re Application of Carr-Williams (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 752.]
(No. 91-2406
Submitted March 17, 1992
Decided June 10, 1992.)
Charles W Kettlewell, for applicant.
Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease and Jonathan R. Vaughn, for the Columbus Bar Association Admissions Committee.
Timothy J. Ucker, Special Investigator, for the Board of Commissioners on Character and Fitness.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Having reviewed the record, we agree with the board's finding that Gail P. Carr-Williams has not established her present eligibility for admission to the practice of law in Ohio. We also agree with the board's recommendation. Therefore, Carr-Williams' application is disapproved, and she may reapply pursuant to the conditions stated by the board.
Order accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.