Case Name: Edith Kane, Resp't, v. The Metropolitan Railway Co. et al., App'lts
Court: New York Superior Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1891-12-17
Citations: 41 N.Y. St. Rep. 956
Docket Number: 
Parties: Edith Kane, Resp’t, v. The Metropolitan Railway Co. et al., App’lts.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 41
Pages: 956–956

Head Matter:
Edith Kane, Resp’t, v. The Metropolitan Railway Co. et al., App’lts.
Appeal from judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff.
Davies & Rapallo, for app’lts; J. A. Weeks, for resp’t.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We have carefully examined the record. The findings were intelligently passed upon, according to prevailing practice, and we have failed to discover any error in the rulings which requires a new trial.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.