Case Name: Samuel B. Schweitzer, Respondent, v. Max Mindlin, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1928-05-11
Citations: 248 N.Y. 560
Docket Number: 
Parties: Samuel B. Schweitzer, Respondent, v. Max Mindlin, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 248
Pages: 560–561

Head Matter:
Samuel B. Schweitzer, Respondent, v. Max Mindlin, Appellant.
(Argued April 30, 1928;
decided May 11, 1928.)
Lyman A. Spalding, Arthur McCausland and William J. Nolan for appellant.
George Eilperin and Habeeb Abokair for respondent.

Opinion:
Order of Appellate Division and that of Special Term reversed and defendant's motion for judgment granted, with costs in all courts. Question certified answered in the negative. Held, that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action in that it fails to state any facts from which an inference of negligence is possible.
Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrew's, Lehman, Kellogg and O'Brien, JJ.