Case Name: Omega Casting Corp., Respondent, v. Graphic Arts Mutual Insurance Company, Appellant, et al., Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2000-03-21
Citations: 270 A.D.2d 126
Docket Number: 
Parties: Omega Casting Corp., Respondent, v Graphic Arts Mutual Insurance Company, Appellant, et al., Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 270
Pages: 126–127

Head Matter:
Omega Casting Corp., Respondent, v Graphic Arts Mutual Insurance Company, Appellant, et al., Defendant.
[705 NYS2d 44]

Opinion:
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Kapnick, J.), entered on or about December 18, 1998, inter alia, denying defendant-appellant's cross motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The subject policy of insurance issued by defendant insurer to plaintiff jewelry manufacturer limits the insurer's liability thereunder for loss occasioned by the theft of the insured's "pattern[s]" to- $2,500. Because it is not clear, as a matter of law, that limitation should apply where the insured's loss is attributable to theft of its jewelry "model[s]," summary judgment was properly denied. The affidavits of jewelry manufacturers submitted by plaintiff were sufficient to raise a triable question as to whether the terms "model" and "pattern", when understood from the insured's perspective as a jewelry manufacturer, were, in fact, interchangeable as defendant-appellant contends. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Ellerin and Saxe, JJ.