Case Name: Biscoe et al. vs. James et al.
Court: Arkansas Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Arkansas
Decision Date: 1849-07
Citations: 10 Ark. 163
Docket Number: 
Parties: Biscoe et al. vs. James et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Arkansas Reports
Volume: 10
Pages: 163–163

Head Matter:
Biscoe et al. vs. James et al.
Part payment of a debt by one joint and several-debtor, after the debí is barred by the statute of limitations, does not revive the debt as to his co-debtor.
The leading English and American eases on this subject reviewed,
íat R. E. Bank vs. Harlficld, 5 Brk. 551, the pari payment was made before the debt was barred. Biscoe •et ■al. vs. Jenkins et alante.
Writ &f Error t& Fmnklin Circuit Court.

Opinion:
Scott, J,
This case is within the rule declared in the case of Henry L. Biscoe et al. vs. W. G. Jenkins et al., ante; and as there is no error in the record, the judgment of the court below must be affirmed.