Case Name: CAPUTO, Respondent, v. CAPUTO, Respondent, LAWRENCE, aka Bachman, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1981-07-06
Citations: 53 Or. App. 83
Docket Number: No. 77-11-86, CA 19376
Parties: CAPUTO, Respondent, v. CAPUTO, Respondent, LAWRENCE, aka Bachman, Appellant.
Judges: Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Thornton and Van Hoomissen, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 53
Pages: 83–84

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted April 22,
affirmed July 6, 1981
CAPUTO, Respondent, v. CAPUTO, Respondent, LAWRENCE, aka Bachman, Appellant.
(No. 77-11-86, CA 19376)
630 P2d 418
Keith R. Swensen, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Thorpe and Swensen, Portland.
Anthony Barker, Portland, argued the cause for respondent James Bruce Caputo. William W. Shatzer, Portland, filed the brief for respondent James Bruce Caputo. With him on the brief was Douglas H. Steams, P.C., Portland.
Charles W. Camese, Portland, waived appearance for respondent James Caputo.
Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Thornton and Van Hoomissen, Judges.
PER CURIAM.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This appeal presents purely a fact question which is to be resolved by a determination of the relative credibility of the parties and their respective witnesses. The trial judge resolved this issue and we agree with that determination.
Affirmed.