Case Name: HARRY MICHLER, RESPONDENT, v. NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY COMPANY, INCORPORATED, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1928-05-14
Citations: 104 N.J.L. 663
Docket Number: 
Parties: HARRY MICHLER, RESPONDENT, v. NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY COMPANY, INCORPORATED, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 104
Pages: 663–663

Head Matter:
HARRY MICHLER, RESPONDENT, v. NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY COMPANY, INCORPORATED, APPELLANT.
Submitted February 17, 1928
Decided May 14, 1928.
Eor the respondent, William Simon.
Eor the appellant, Harley, Gox & Walburg.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Kalisch in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Black, Campbell, White, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.