Case Name: THOSE CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS OF LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO. 1361, et al., Appellants, v. FLORIDA LONGHORN, INC., a corporation, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1970-01-27
Citations: 230 So. 2d 725
Docket Number: Nos. 69-25, 69-115
Parties: THOSE CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS OF LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO. 1361, et al., Appellants, v. FLORIDA LONGHORN, INC., a corporation, Appellee.
Judges: Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and SWANN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 230
Pages: 725–725

Head Matter:
THOSE CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS OF LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO. 1361, et al., Appellants, v. FLORIDA LONGHORN, INC., a corporation, Appellee.
Nos. 69-25, 69-115.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
Jan. 27, 1970.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 20, 1970.
Fowler, White, Collins, Gillen, Humkey & Trenam, and Reginald M. Hayden, Jr., Miami, for appellants.
Sams, Anderson, Alper & Spencer, Horton & Schwartz, Miami, for appellee.
Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and SWANN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By these consolidated appeals, the defendants seek review and reversal of an amended final judgment rendered for the plaintiffs, Florida Longhorn, Inc., after a non-jury trial.
Appellants argue that the trial court erred in making four separate findings of fact on which his conclusions of law and liability were based.
We have carefully examined the record on appeal and reviewed the seven page final judgment entered by the learned trial judge and find it to be a clear and lucid opinion and decision which is supported by competent, substantial evidence in the record on appeal.
It is, therefore,
Affirmed.