Case Name: William E. HARDEE, Appellant, v. Rose Marie HARDEE, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2005-03-04
Citations: 894 So. 2d 1082
Docket Number: No. 1D04-5630
Parties: William E. HARDEE, Appellant, v. Rose Marie HARDEE, Appellee.
Judges: WEBSTER, PADOVANO and HAWKES, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 894
Pages: 1082–1082

Head Matter:
William E. HARDEE, Appellant, v. Rose Marie HARDEE, Appellee.
No. 1D04-5630.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
March 4, 2005.
Wendy S. Loquasto, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Daniel T. O’Connell, Gainesville, for Ap-pellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the appellant's response to the Court's order of January 24, 2005, the Court has determined that the appellant's untimely motion for rehearing did not delay rendition of the underlying final judgment. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.530(b); Fla. R.App. P. 9.020(h). Thus, the notice of appeal was insufficient to timely invoke the Court's jurisdiction. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed as untimely.
WEBSTER, PADOVANO and HAWKES, JJ., concur.