Case Name: Heckler Electric Company, Inc., Respondent, v. Board of Education, Union Free School District No. 7, Town of North Hempstead, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1961-10-30
Citations: 14 A.D.2d 816
Docket Number: 
Parties: Heckler Electric Company, Inc., Respondent, v. Board of Education, Union Free School District No. 7, Town of North Hempstead, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 14
Pages: 816–816

Head Matter:
Heckler Electric Company, Inc., Respondent, v. Board of Education, Union Free School District No. 7, Town of North Hempstead, Appellant.

Opinion:
We are in accord with the determination at Special Term that the allegations of the complaint, which are pleaded pursuant to section 3813 of the Education Law, are conclusory, but that such conclusory allegations are nevertheless expressly authorized by the statute. Hence, we are of the opinion that the motion by defendant pursuant to rule 102 of the Rules of Civil Practice was properly denied, as was defendant's motion pursuant to rule 90. We have passed on no other question. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.