Case Name: Ihosvanny ALBEAR, Appellant, v. Louis M. HILLMAN-WALLER, as Curator of the Estate of Roberto Albear, Adriana Ulloa, and Royal Park Enterprises, LLC, Appellees.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2019-05-08
Citations: 275 So. 3d 690
Docket Number: No. 3D19-0130
Parties: Ihosvanny ALBEAR, Appellant,
v.
Louis M. HILLMAN-WALLER, as Curator of the Estate of Roberto Albear, Adriana Ulloa, and Royal Park Enterprises, LLC, Appellees.
Judges: Before SALTER, LINDSEY, and HENDON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 275
Pages: 690–691

Head Matter:
Ihosvanny ALBEAR, Appellant,
v.
Louis M. HILLMAN-WALLER, as Curator of the Estate of Roberto Albear, Adriana Ulloa, and Royal Park Enterprises, LLC, Appellees.
No. 3D19-0130
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Opinion filed May 8, 2019
Rehearing Denied June 12, 2019
Andrew M. Kassier, P.A., and Andrew M. Kassier, for appellant.
Armas Bertran Pieri, and J. Alfredo Armas, for appellee Adriana Ulloa.
Before SALTER, LINDSEY, and HENDON, JJ.
ON MOTION TO DISMISS

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Ihosvanny Albear appeals a final judgment entered following a bench trial. Appellees move to dismiss on the basis that, because there is no transcript of the trial below, Albear cannot meet his burden to show error. We agree and affirm because the 15-page final judgment contains numerous factual findings and there is no record of the trial. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) ("When there are issues of fact the appellant necessarily asks the reviewing court to draw conclusions about the evidence. Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory. Without knowing the factual context, neither can an appellate court reasonably conclude that the trial judge so misconceived the law as to require reversal."); see also Cudeiro v. Dep't of Revenue ex rel. Fritz, 99 So.3d 520, 520 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (explaining Starks v. Starks, 423 So.2d 452, 453-54 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) as follows: "without a transcript of the hearing, the appellate court is unable to ascertain whether the lower court erred; noting that '[t]he appellant retains the burden of overcoming the presumption of correctness attributed to a trial court's final judgment. Appellant's burden includes a demonstration of error from the record , which he must supply' " (quoting Kauffmann v. Baker, 392 So.2d 13, 15 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980) ).
Affirmed.
Appellees allege in their motion to dismiss that the parties agreed to try the case without a court reporter "hoping for finality."