Case Name: Nathan Andrew GROVES; Joel Stroud, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DARLINGTON SOUTH CAROLINA, the CITY OF, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-12-08
Citations: 457 F. App'x 230
Docket Number: No. 11-1298
Parties: Nathan Andrew GROVES; Joel Stroud, Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. DARLINGTON SOUTH CAROLINA, the CITY OF, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 457
Pages: 230–231

Head Matter:
Nathan Andrew GROVES; Joel Stroud, Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. DARLINGTON SOUTH CAROLINA, the CITY OF, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 11-1298.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 9, 2011.
Decided: Dec. 8, 2011.
Joel F. Stroud, Joel F. Stroud, Chesterfield, South Carolina, for Appellants. J. Scott Kozacki, Willcox, Buyck & Williams, P.A., Florence, South Carolina, for Appel-lee.
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
The Appellants, Nathan Andrew Groves and Joel Flake Stroud, appeal the district court's order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment in favor of the Appel-lee and rendering the Appellee's pending motions moot, and the magistrate judge's order denying the Appellants' motion to transfer the case to another division of the district court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's and magistrate judge's orders. We also deny the Appellants' motion to expedite the decision as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.