Case Name: Darryl L. RICHARDSON, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NATION DIRECTOR OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS; Director Vamc-Hampton; Dr. Huffler; Head Nurse-Diet V.A. Kitchen; Vinson Maniford, Director V.A.-Vocational Rehabilitation; Counselor Rick Sweat, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-01-22
Citations: 267 F. App'x 211
Docket Number: No. 07-1955
Parties: Darryl L. RICHARDSON, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NATION DIRECTOR OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS; Director Vamc-Hampton; Dr. Huffier; Head Nurse-Diet V.A. Kitchen; Vinson Maniford, Director V.A.-Vocational Rehabilitation; Counselor Rick Sweat, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 267
Pages: 211–211

Head Matter:
Darryl L. RICHARDSON, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NATION DIRECTOR OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS; Director Vamc-Hampton; Dr. Huffier; Head Nurse-Diet V.A. Kitchen; Vinson Maniford, Director V.A.-Vocational Rehabilitation; Counselor Rick Sweat, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 07-1955.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 17, 2008.
Decided: Jan. 22, 2008.
Darryl L. Richardson, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Darryl L. Richardson, Sr., appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil action without prejudice for failure to pay the required filing fee. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Richardson v. Nat'l Dir. of Dep't of Veterans Affairs, No. 4:06-cv-00008-WDK (E.D. Va. filed July 27, 2007 & entered July 30, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.