Case Name: Noble, Administrator, v. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Company
Court: Appellate Court of Indiana
Jurisdiction: Indiana
Decision Date: 1909-03-18
Citations: 43 Ind. App. 430
Docket Number: No. 6,808
Parties: Noble, Administrator, v. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Company.
Judges: 
Reporter: Indiana Court of Appeals Reports
Volume: 43
Pages: 430–430

Head Matter:
Noble, Administrator, v. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Company.
[No. 6,808.
Filed March 18, 1909.]
Appear. — Motion to Dismiss.■ — Notice.—A motion by appellee to dismiss an appeal will be overruled, where the appellant was given no notice of such motion.
Prom Boone Circuit Court; Samuel B. Artman, Judge.
Action by Benjamin P. Noble, as administrator of the estate of Charles Cattell, deceased, against the Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Company. Prom a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.
On motion to dismiss appeal. (For decision on merits, see — Ind. App. —.) Motion overruled.
M. M. Bachelder, for appellant.
F. Winter and W. H. Latta, for appellee.

Opinion:
Watson, C. J.
The appellee appeared specially herein on February 5, 1909, and filed its motion to dismiss this appeal for the following reasons: (1) This court has no jurisdiction of the appellee in this cause. (2) Appellant has not complied with rule thirty-six of this court. (3) The record in this cause presents no question for the decision of this court.
But appellee has not given appellant any notice of this motion, at least no proof of any notice has been made. Rule fifteen of this court requires that notice of motions of this character must be given the appellant. It has been held that the compliance with this rule will be enforced. Dick v. Mullins (1891), 128 Ind. 365; Elliott, App. Proc., §533; Ewbank's Manual, §199.
The motion to dismiss this appeal is therefore overruled, and the clerk is instructed to tax the costs of said motion against the appellee.