Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Juan MARTINEZ-SALGADO, also known as Juan Salgado Martinez, also known as Juan Martinez Salgado, also known as Juan S. Martinez, also known as Luciano Escopa, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-02-02
Citations: 710 F. App'x 636
Docket Number: No. 17-20247 Summary Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Juan MARTINEZ-SALGADO, also known as Juan Salgado Martinez, also known as Juan Martinez Salgado, also known as Juan S. Martinez, also known as Luciano Escopa, Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before REAVLEY, PRADO, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 710
Pages: 636–636

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Juan MARTINEZ-SALGADO, also known as Juan Salgado Martinez, also known as Juan Martinez Salgado, also known as Juan S. Martinez, also known as Luciano Escopa, Defendant-Appellant
No. 17-20247 Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed February 2, 2018
Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Juan Martinez-Salgado, Pro Se
Before REAVLEY, PRADO, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Martinez-Salgado has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Martinez-Salgado has not fíled a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cm. R. 47,5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cm. R. 47.5.4,