Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marco Antonio PINTO-LORENZO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-08-05
Citations: 286 F. App'x 503
Docket Number: No. 07-50466
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marco Antonio PINTO-LORENZO, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 286
Pages: 503–503

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marco Antonio PINTO-LORENZO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-50466.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 22, 2008.
Filed Aug. 5, 2008.
Michael J. Raphael, Esq., Bruce Searby, Esq., USLA-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Michael Tanaka, Esq., FPDCA-Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: B. FLETCHER, THOMAS, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Marco Pinto-Lorenzo appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to being an illegal alien found in the United States after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1826(a). He contends that the district court plainly erred by adding a criminal history point under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.1(e) on the ground that he committed the instant offense after his release from jail on a prior conviction, even though in fact he committed the offense before his release from custody. This argument was not presented to the district court. We vacate the sentence and remand for the district court to consider Pinto-Lorenzo's argument regarding § 4A 1.1(e).
VACATED and REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.