Case Name: SCUNGIO BORST & ASSOCIATES v. 410 SHURS LANE DEVELOPERS, LLC and Kenworth II, LLC and Robert DeBolt Petition of Scungio Borst & Associates
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2015-07-28
Citations: 120 A.3d 298
Docket Number: 
Parties: SCUNGIO BORST & ASSOCIATES v. 410 SHURS LANE DEVELOPERS, LLC and Kenworth II, LLC and Robert DeBolt Petition of Scungio Borst & Associates.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 120
Pages: 298–299

Head Matter:
SCUNGIO BORST & ASSOCIATES v. 410 SHURS LANE DEVELOPERS, LLC and Kenworth II, LLC and Robert DeBolt Petition of Scungio Borst & Associates.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
July 28, 2015.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 28th day of July, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue as set forth by Petitioner is:
Did the lower court commit an error of law or abuse its discretion in granting summary judgment to [Robert] DeBolt under [the Contractor and Subcontractor Payment Act ("CASPA"), 73 P.S. § 501 et seq.], where: (a) CASPA makes the owner [ (410 Shurs Lane Developers, LLC) ] and the "agent of the owner acting with the owner's authority" (DeBolt) liable to contractors such as [Petitioner], (b) DeBolt is a fifty percent owner of [410 Shurs Lane Developers], (c) [Petitioner] consistently dealt with DeBolt and received his authorizations for change orders, (d) [Petitioner] never received payment for the change orders, and (e) [Petitioner's] construction of CASPA is consistent with the courts' construction of the Wage Payment and Collection Law[, 43 P.S. § 260.1 et seq.Jl