Case Name: Manuel Fernandes et al. v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Bridgeport et al.
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1991-04-18
Citations: 218 Conn. 909
Docket Number: 
Parties: Manuel Fernandes et al. v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Bridgeport et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 218
Pages: 909–909

Head Matter:
Manuel Fernandes et al. v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Bridgeport et al.
Decided April 18, 1991
J. Roger Shull, in support of the petition.

Opinion:
The plaintiffs' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 24 Conn. App. 49, is granted, limited to the following issues:
"1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court should not have sustained the appeal because there had been no material change of circumstances since the denial of a previous application concerning the same property?
"2. Was the record before the Appellate Court adequate for the purpose of considering the plaintiffs' claim that the variance was granted in violation of certain provisions of the Bridgeport zoning regulations?"