Case Name: Goldenson v. Lawrence
Court: New York City Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1892-10
Citations: 1 Misc. 2
Docket Number: No. 2
Parties: Goldenson v. Lawrence,
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 1
Pages: 2–2

Head Matter:
Goldenson v. Lawrence,
No. 2.
(City Court of New York—General Term,
October, 1892.)
Where on appeal from an order, resettling a former order, the facts are disputed, the certificate of the judge who granted the order, as to what. occurred before him, is conclusive.
Appeal from an order made May 31,1892, resettling former order, etc.
Goodrich, Deady & Goodrich, for defendants (appellants).
Demid leventritt, for plaintiff (respondent).

Opinion:
Ehrlich, Ch. J.
Where the facts are undisputed, the court on appeal may direct the resettlement of a case or order to conform to the facts. New York, Rubber Co. v. Rothery, 112 N. Y. 592; Second Appeal, 119 id. 633; Gleason v. Smith, 34 Hun, 547; Healey v. Terry, 26 N. Y. St. Repr. 929.
But here the facts are disputed. The certificate of the judge as to what occurred before him must be accepted as conclusive. Green v. Shute, 26 N. Y. St. Repr. 114; Healey v. Terry, 26 id. 929. This rule applies to the present contention (Smith v. Grant, 11 Civ. Proc. Rep. 354), and requires that the order appealed from must be affirmed with costs.
Van Wyck and McCarthy, JJ, concur.
Order affirmed.