Case Name: In the Matter of M. Q., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. M. Q., Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2013-11-27
Citations: 259 Or. App. 651
Docket Number: 301211442; A151813
Parties: In the Matter of M. Q., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. M. Q., Appellant.
Judges: Before Schuman, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Duncan, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 259
Pages: 651–652

Head Matter:
Submitted October 4,
reversed November 27, 2013
In the Matter of M. Q., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. M. Q., Appellant.
Lane County Circuit Court
301211442; A151813
314 P3d 1003
James A. Palmer filed the brief for appellant.
Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General, and Erin C. Lagesen, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Schuman, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Duncan, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that, contrary to the trial court's ruling, the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence any of the bases for commitment under ORS 426.005. The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state's concession, and reverse.
Reversed.