Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael S. TOKARSKI, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-04-24
Citations: 60 F. App'x 986
Docket Number: No. 03-6277
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael S. TOKARSKI, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 60
Pages: 986–987

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael S. TOKARSKI, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 03-6277.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 17, 2003.
Decided April 24, 2003.
Michael S. Tokarski, Appellant pro se. Damon A. King, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Michael S. Tokarski seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Tokarski has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.