Case Name: Graham P. BARNHART, Petitioner-Appellant, v. E. L. MAXWELL, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1967-01-12
Citations: 371 F.2d 583
Docket Number: No. 17195
Parties: Graham P. BARNHART, Petitioner-Appellant, v. E. L. MAXWELL, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 371
Pages: 583–584

Head Matter:
Graham P. BARNHART, Petitioner-Appellant, v. E. L. MAXWELL, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 17195.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
Jan. 12, 1967.
Graham P. Barnhart, in pro. per.
William B. Saxbe, Atty. Gen., Leo J. Conway, Asst. Atty. Gen., Columbus, Ohio, for appellee.
Before WEICK, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and CELEBREZZE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is a habeas corpus case. The facts are stated in some detail in Barn-hart v. Maxwell, 2 Ohio St.2d 308, 208 N.E.2d 752.
The district court denied the writ without a hearing, on the ground that the petitioner alleged no facts or details to indicate in what manner he contends he is restrained illegally of his liberty. In the absence of such allegations, an evi-dentiary hearing is not required. Reams v. Davis, 333 F.2d 430 (C.A. 6); Loum v. Underwood, 262 F.2d 866 (C.A. 6).
Affirmed.