Case Name: David Anderson McCRAY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1985-10-01
Citations: 475 So. 2d 1344
Docket Number: No. 84-2749
Parties: David Anderson McCRAY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 475
Pages: 1344–1345

Head Matter:
David Anderson McCRAY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 84-2749.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 1, 1985.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Lionel Barnet and James H. Greason, Sp. Asst. Public Defenders, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Mark J. Ber-kowitz, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Possession of a firearm while engaged in a criminal offense is not a necessarily-lesser-included offense of first-degree murder, and therefore, the separate convictions of the defendant for those crimes are affirmed. See State v. Boivin (Fla.1985) (Case No. 64,368, opinion filed August 29, 1985) (possession of a firearm during commission of a felony, first-degree murder); State v. Baker, 456 So.2d 419 (Fla.1984) (use of a firearm during commission of a felony, first-degree murder); State v. Gibson, 452 So.2d 553 (Fla.1984) (on rehearing) (use or display of a firearm during commission of a felony, armed robbery).
Affirmed.