Case Name: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. VINCENZO PISCITELLI ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1937-04-30
Citations: 118 N.J.L. 182
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. VINCENZO PISCITELLI ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 118
Pages: 182–182

Head Matter:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. VINCENZO PISCITELLI ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR.
Argued February 3, 1937
Decided April 30, 1937.
For the defendant in error, Charles M. Morris.
For the plaintiffs in error, John E. Toolan.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.