Case Name: Melvis PALMER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2016-11-01
Citations: 501 S.W.3d 910
Docket Number: No. ED103613
Parties: Melvis PALMER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J, and Colleen Dolan, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 501
Pages: 910–911

Head Matter:
Melvis PALMER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED103613
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISON TWO.
Filed: November 1, 2016
Ellen H. Flottman, Columbia, MO, for Plaintiff/Appellant.
Colette E. Neuner, Jefferson City, MO, for Defendant/Respondent.
Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J, and Colleen Dolan, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Melvis Palmer (Defendant) appeals from the motion court's denial of his Rule 24.035 motion alleging there was an insufficient factual basis for the court to accept his plea of guilty to assault in the first degree and sexual assault. We have reviewed thé briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's denial of Defendant's motion was not clearly erroneous. Morrow v. State, 21 S.W.3d 819, 822 (Mo. banc 2000); Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment of the motion court.