Case Name: Edward H. SATERSTAD, Petitioner v. Joshua D. LOCK, Goldberg, Katzman & Shipman, P.C., Kathy Murray, Skip Gochenour, Courtney L. Kishel and James, Smith, Dietterick & Connelly, LLP, Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2017-12-04
Citations: 175 A.3d 984
Docket Number: No. 375 MAL 2017
Parties: Edward H. SATERSTAD, Petitioner v. Joshua D. LOCK, Goldberg, Katzman & Shipman, P.C., Kathy Murray, Skip Gochenour, Courtney L. Kishel and James, Smith, Dietterick & Connelly, LLP, Respondents
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 175
Pages: 984–984

Head Matter:
Edward H. SATERSTAD, Petitioner v. Joshua D. LOCK, Goldberg, Katzman & Shipman, P.C., Kathy Murray, Skip Gochenour, Courtney L. Kishel and James, Smith, Dietterick & Connelly, LLP, Respondents
No. 375 MAL 2017
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
December 4, 2017

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 4th day of December, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal and Application for Leave to File Reply Brief are DENIED.