Case Name: Irwin ZUCKERMAN, et al., Appellants, v. CITIBANK, N.A., etc., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-06-11
Citations: 580 So. 2d 886
Docket Number: Nos. 89-2446, 90-13
Parties: Irwin ZUCKERMAN, et al., Appellants, v. CITIBANK, N.A., etc., Appellees.
Judges: Before NESBITT, BASKIN and COPE, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 580
Pages: 886–886

Head Matter:
Irwin ZUCKERMAN, et al., Appellants, v. CITIBANK, N.A., etc., Appellees.
Nos. 89-2446, 90-13.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
June 11, 1991.
Rehearing Denied July 16, 1991.
Miller and Russell, Coral Gables, Kron-gold, Bass & Todd, Daniels & Hicks, and Angela Flowers, Miami, for appellants.
Podhurst, Orseck, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow, Olin & Perwin, and Joel Eaton, Miami, for appellees.
Before NESBITT, BASKIN and COPE, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Kaminester, 400 So.2d 804, 807 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Ed Skoda Ford, Inc. v. P & P Paint & Body Shop, Inc., 277 So.2d 818, 819 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 284 So.2d 395 (Fla.1973); Arrow Beef Corp. v. Dutkin, 183 So.2d 862 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966); Jones v. Royal Palm Ice Co., 145 So.2d 887, 888 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962), cert. denied, 155 So.2d 552 (Fla.1963).