Case Name: GEORGE MICHAEL UMTUCH, Appellant, v. BOARD OF PAROLE, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1991-10-30
Citations: 109 Or. App. 481
Docket Number: 90-C12069, 90-C-12069; CA A67210, A67370
Parties: GEORGE MICHAEL UMTUCH, Appellant, v. BOARD OF PAROLE, Respondent.
Judges: Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Joseph, Chief Judge, and Deits, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 109
Pages: 481–482

Head Matter:
Submitted on record and appellant’s brief August 27,
reversed and remanded for new trial October 30, 1991
GEORGE MICHAEL UMTUCH, Appellant, v. BOARD OF PAROLE, Respondent.
(90-C12069, 90-C-12069; CA A67210 (Control), A67370)
818 P2d 1300
Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, and Stephen J. Bedor, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, filed the brief for appellant.
Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem, waived appearance for respondent.
Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Joseph, Chief Judge, and Deits, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
In this habeas corpus action, the trial court, on its own motion after the writ was issued, dismissed it before defendant had filed a return. The state has conceded by a letter waiving its appearance that that was error. Bird v. Maass, 104 Or App 271, 800 P2d 792 (1990). We accept the concession.
Reversed and remanded for a new trial.
There are 2 appellate case numbers, because 2 notices of appeal were filed by different counsel.