Case Name: Dorothy Maedl, Respondent, v. International Railway Company, Appellant, and Martin Baldis, Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1940-05-22
Citations: 259 A.D. 980
Docket Number: 
Parties: Dorothy Maedl, Respondent, v. International Railway Company, Appellant, and Martin Baldis, Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 259
Pages: 980–980

Head Matter:
Dorothy Maedl, Respondent, v. International Railway Company, Appellant, and Martin Baldis, Defendant.

Opinion:
Judgment and orders affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Crosby, P. J., and Taylor, J., who dissent and vote for reversal on the facts and for granting a new trial on the ground that the verdict as to appellant's negligence is against the weight of the evidence. (The judgment is for plaintiff in a railway negligence action. The orders deny motions for a new trial.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and Harris, JJ.