Case Name: In the Matter of the Marriage of CONDON, Respondent, and CONDON, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1984-11-14
Citations: 70 Or. App. 725
Docket Number: 81-1869-E; CA A31569
Parties: In the Matter of the Marriage of CONDON, Respondent, and CONDON, Appellant.
Judges: Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Van Hoomissen and Young, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 70
Pages: 725–726

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted November 5,
reversed November 14,1984
In the Matter of the Marriage of CONDON, Respondent, and CONDON, Appellant.
(81-1869-E; CA A31569)
690 P2d 1121
Donald H. Coulter, Grants Pass, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Myrick, Coulter, Sea-graves, Myrick & Adams, Grants Pass.
Walter L. Cauble, Grants Pass, waived appearance for respondent.
Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Van Hoomissen and Young, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
The trial court's holding that defendant was in indirect contempt is not supported by adequate findings. See State ex rel v. Bassett, 166 Or 628, 113 P2d 432, 114 P2d 546 (1941); State ex rel Hiers v. Strain, 56 Or App 402, 642 P2d 315 (1982).
Reversed. Costs to appellant.