Case Name: Lidale R. KELLUM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2018-05-18
Citations: 242 So. 3d 539
Docket Number: No. 1D16–2188
Parties: Lidale R. KELLUM, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Rowe and Winsor, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 242
Pages: 539–540

Head Matter:
Lidale R. KELLUM, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D16-2188
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
May 18, 2018
Henry Sims, Public Defender, Panama City, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Rowe and Winsor, JJ., concur.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Lidale R. Kellum appeals the trial court's denial of his motion seeking postconviction relief based on newly discovered evidence. Because the evidence on which Kellum relied was discoverable at the time of his violation of probation hearing, the trial court properly denied the motion. See Rutherford v. State , 926 So.2d 1100, 1107 (Fla. 2006) (holding that newly discovered evidence must be based on facts that were unknown to the trial court, appellant, and his counsel at the time of trial and that neither the appellant nor his counsel could have discovered the facts through the exercise of due diligence).
AFFIRMED.