Case Name: Roz Ben-Zvi, Appellant, v. Kronish Lieb Weiner & Hellman L. L. P. et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2000-12-28
Citations: 278 A.D.2d 167
Docket Number: 
Parties: Roz Ben-Zvi, Appellant, v Kronish Lieb Weiner & Hellman L. L. P. et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 278
Pages: 167–167

Head Matter:
Roz Ben-Zvi, Appellant, v Kronish Lieb Weiner & Hellman L. L. P. et al., Respondents.
[718 NYS2d 328]

Opinion:
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Kapnick, J.), entered July 20, 1999, dismissing the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiffs cause of action for legal malpractice based on defendants' representation of him in a Federal criminal proceeding is precluded by plaintiffs undisturbed conviction on some of the charges in that proceeding, an obstacle that plaintiff cannot avoid by pleading a purported cause of action for breach of contract alleging that defendants failed to perform their contract to represent him with due care (see, Kaplan v Sachs, 224 AD2d 666, lv dismissed and denied 88 NY2d 952). Plaintiffs cause of action for fraud, based on allegations that defendants billed him for services that either were not performed or were overstated, was properly dismissed for failure to satisfy the specificity requirement of CPLR 3016 (b) (see, Callas v Eisenberg, 192 AD2d 349). Plaintiffs cause of action for negligent infliction of emotional distress was properly dismissed for lack of an allegation that defendants' conduct unreasonably and directly endangered his physical safety (see, Wolkstein v Morgenstern, 275 AD2d 635, 637). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Williams, Mazzarelli and Friedman, JJ.