Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark Anthony HOUGH, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-01-15
Citations: 306 F. App'x 823
Docket Number: No. 08-7522
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Mark Anthony HOUGH, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 306
Pages: 823–823

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Mark Anthony HOUGH, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 08-7522.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 18, 2009.
Decided: Jan. 15, 2009.
Mark Anthony Hough, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Mark Anthony Hough appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion for reduction of his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hough, No. 4:02-cr-00471-TLW-3 (D.S.C. filed July 21, 2008; entered July 22, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.