Case Name: Christopher RICHARDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William MUSE, Chairman; Harold W. Clarke, Director, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-08-12
Citations: 611 F. App'x 787
Docket Number: No. 15-6404
Parties: Christopher RICHARDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William MUSE, Chairman; Harold W. Clarke, Director, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 611
Pages: 787–787

Head Matter:
Christopher RICHARDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William MUSE, Chairman; Harold W. Clarke, Director, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15-6404.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 28, 2015.
Decided: Aug. 12, 2015.
Christopher Richards, Appellant Pro Se. James Milburn Isaacs, Jr., Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Richards appeals the district court's order granting Defendants summary judgment in Richards' 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Specifically, we observe that Richards' claims with respect to the application of Virginia's three-strikes provision are time-barred, and that he has failed to sufficiently allege any related equal protection claims in his complaint. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. See Richards v. Muse, No. l:13-cv-01472-CMH-JFA, 2015 WL 853886 (E.D.Va. Feb. 26, 2015). . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.