Case Name: Cecelia MARTINEZ, Employee/Claimant, v. INCARNATE WORD HOSPITAL, Employer/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-11-01
Citations: 175 S.W.3d 201
Docket Number: No. ED 86213
Parties: Cecelia MARTINEZ, Employee/Claimant, v. INCARNATE WORD HOSPITAL, Employer/Respondent.
Judges: Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J. and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J. and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 175
Pages: 201–202

Head Matter:
Cecelia MARTINEZ, Employee/Claimant, v. INCARNATE WORD HOSPITAL, Employer/Respondent.
No. ED 86213.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Nov. 1, 2005.
Thomas C. DeVoto, DeVoto & Benbe-nek, LLC, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Kevin M. Leahy, Catherine S. Salmon, and Catherine Vale Jochens, Moser and Marsalek, PC, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J. and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J. and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Cecilia Martinez (Claimant) appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) affirming the award of the administrative law judge and denying compensation because Incarnate Word Hospital was not liable for mental injuries Claimant allegedly suffered.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The Commission's award is supported by sufficient competent and substantial evidence in the record as a whole. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth our reasons for the order affirming the Commission's award pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).