Case Name: Mary USHER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ATLANTA TRANSIT SYSTEM, INC., Third-Party-Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1972-02-08
Citations: 454 F.2d 728
Docket Number: No. 71-2890
Parties: Mary USHER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ATLANTA TRANSIT SYSTEM, INC., Third-Party-Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 454
Pages: 728–728

Head Matter:
Mary USHER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ATLANTA TRANSIT SYSTEM, INC., Third-Party-Defendant-Appellant.
No. 71-2890
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Feb. 8, 1972.
Rehearing Denied March 7, 1972.
Dent Aeree, Atlanta, Ga., for Atlanta Transit System.
John W. Stokes, Jr., U. S. Atty., Beverly Bates, Asst. U. S. Atty., R. Beverly Irwin, Atlanta, Ga., for Mary Usher.
Cullen M. Ward, Frank M. Eldridge, Atlanta, Ga., for Mrs. Bowden and Miss Jones and others.
Before THORNBERRY, COLEMAN and INGRAHAM, Circuit Judges.
Rule 18, 5th Cir.,; See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

Opinion:
BY THE COURT;
It appears from the record in this case that the United States has dismissed its appeal, that Atlanta Transit System, Inc., has suffered no legal consequences from the judgment below as it has been given full credit for the amount it has paid pursuant to a previous state court judgment between it and the plaintiff-appellee, and that there now remains no actual controversy between and among the parties. This appeal is dismissed as moot.
Appeal dismissed.