Case Name: George R. Barker, Respondent, v. Robert P. Tamarin, Appellant, et al., Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2000-04-10
Citations: 271 A.D.2d 467
Docket Number: 
Parties: George R. Barker, Respondent, v Robert P. Tamarin, Appellant, et al., Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 271
Pages: 467–467

Head Matter:
George R. Barker, Respondent, v Robert P. Tamarin, Appellant, et al., Defendant.
[706 NYS2d 904]

Opinion:
—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of a fiduciary duty, the defendant Robert T. Tamarin appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Cusick, J.), entered April 27, 1999, as denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The appellant failed to establish a prima facie case of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see, Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557). Thus, his motion was properly denied. Bracken, J. P., Ritter, Santucci and S. Miller, JJ., concur.