Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Olegario ASTUDILLO, also known as Chirro, also known as Nanche, also known as Jesus Hernandez, also known as Javier Gabriel Carachure, also known as Olegario Hernandez Astudillo, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-08-09
Citations: 667 F. App'x 868
Docket Number: No. 15-51105 Summary Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Olegario ASTUDILLO, also known as Chirro, also known as Nanche, also known as Jesus Hernandez, also known as Javier Gabriel Carachure, also known as Olegario Hernandez Astudillo, Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before JOLLY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges,
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 667
Pages: 868–869

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Olegario ASTUDILLO, also known as Chirro, also known as Nanche, also known as Jesus Hernandez, also known as Javier Gabriel Carachure, also known as Olegario Hernandez Astudillo, Defendant-Appellant
No. 15-51105 Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Date Filed: 08/09/2016
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Olegario Astudillo, Pro Se.
Before JOLLY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges,

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Olegario Astudillo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Astudillo has filed a response. The record is not suffi ciently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Astudillo's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Astudillo's response. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, Astudillo's motion for appointment of new counsel is DENIED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.