Case Name: DAVIS, Director General of Railroads, v. FERD-BRENNER LUMBER CO., Inc.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1925-02-07
Citations: 4 F.2d 390
Docket Number: No. 4426
Parties: DAVIS, Director General of Railroads, v. FERD-BRENNER LUMBER CO., Inc.
Judges: Before WALKER, and BRYAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 4
Pages: 390–390

Head Matter:
DAVIS, Director General of Railroads, v. FERD-BRENNER LUMBER CO., Inc.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
February 7, 1925.
Rehearing Denied March 10, 1925.)
No. 4426.
Appeal and error <§=501(2, 3), 548(1) — No questions presented for review, where record shows no exceptions, evidence is not preserved by bill of exceptions, and assignments relate only to judgment.
Where record showed no exceptions to rulings on pleadings or evidence, and evidence on which judgment- was based was not presented by bill of exceptions or otherwise, and where assignments related only to judgment, held, nothing was presented for review.
. In Error to the District Court of the United States for Western District of Louisiana; Rufus E. Foster,. Judge.
Action by James C. Davis, Director General of Railroads, against the Ferd-Brenner Lumber Company, Inc. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
Affirmed,
S. L. Richey, of Alexandria, La., and A. L. Burford, of Texarkana, Ark. (Thornton, Gist & Richey, of Alexandria, La., on the brief), for plaintiff in error.
Nauman S. Scott, of' Alexandria, La. (Hakenyos & Scott, of Alexandria, La., on the brief), for defendant in error.
Before WALKER, and BRYAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This ease was tried by the District Judge, a jury being waived in writing. There was no exception to any ruling on the pleadings, or to the admission or rejection of evidence, during the progress of the trial. The evidence upon which the. judgment was based is not presented by a bill of exceptions or otherwise. The assignments relate only to the judgment. In this state of the record, nothing is presented for review. Bank of Waterproof v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. (C. C. A.) 299 F. 478.
The judgment is affirmed.