Case Name: Joseph Patrick Roman SIMON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James E. HENNING, Facility Chaplain, individual and official capacity; H. Gomez, Facility Commander, individual and official capacity, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-02-27
Citations: 678 F. App'x 598
Docket Number: No. 15-56789
Parties: Joseph Patrick Roman SIMON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James E. HENNING, Facility Chaplain, individual and official capacity; H. Gomez, Facility Commander, individual and official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: GOODWIN, FARRIS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 678
Pages: 598–598

Head Matter:
Joseph Patrick Roman SIMON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James E. HENNING, Facility Chaplain, individual and official capacity; H. Gomez, Facility Commander, individual and official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15-56789
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted February 14, 2017
Filed February 27, 2017
Joseph Patrick Roman Simon, Pro Se
Adam Lee Miederhoff, County Counsel, Office of the County Counsel, San Bernar-dino, CA, for Defendants-Appellees
Before: GOODWIN, FARRIS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
California pretrial detainee Joseph Patrick Roman Simon appeals pro se from the district court's summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies in his § 1983 action relating to his alleged denial of kosher meals and Passover observance. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Williams v. Paramo, 775 F.3d 1182, 1191 (9th Cir. 2015). We vacate and remand.
The district court dismissed Simon's action for failure to exhaust, finding that Simon failed to provide evidence that he was unaware of West Valley Detention Center's grievance procedures in 2012 and 2013. However, Simon provided evidence that the resources available to him during this period failed to explain that he was required to file a second appeal with the facility manager, and that Simon was not otherwise made aware of a second level of appeal. This evidence was sufficient to raise a genuine issue of material fact as to whether administrative remedies were effectively unavailable to Simon. See Ross v. Blake, — U.S. -, 136 S.Ct. 1850, 1859, 195 L.Ed.2d 117 (2016) ("[Wjhen a remedy is . essentially 'unknowable'—so that no ordinary prisoner can make sense of what it demands—then it is also unavailable."). Accordingly, we vacate and remand for further proceedings.
Simon's motion informing the court of retaliatory conduct of jail officials, filed on February 19, 2016, is denied.
VACATED and REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.