Case Name: Kevin Ewing TUGGLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-06-30
Citations: 108 S.W.3d 783
Docket Number: No. WD 61482
Parties: Kevin Ewing TUGGLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before HOWARD, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and HARDWICK, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 108
Pages: 783–783

Head Matter:
Kevin Ewing TUGGLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 61482.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
June 30, 2003.
Mark A. Grothoff, Assistant Public Defender, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Nicole E. Gorovsky, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before HOWARD, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and HARDWICK, JJ.

Opinion:
Order
PER CURIAM.
Kevin Ewing Tuggle appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 postconviction motion. In his sole point on appeal, Tuggle contends the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because he was denied effective assistance of counsel in that his trial counsel failed to object to numerous leading questions by the State during direct examination of its witnesses.
Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).