Case Name: David LAWRENCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1969-11-24
Citations: 419 F.2d 1326
Docket Number: No. 26767
Parties: David LAWRENCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 419
Pages: 1326–1326

Head Matter:
David LAWRENCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 26767.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
Nov. 24, 1969.
Rehearing Denied and Rehearing En Banc Denied Jan. 12, 1970.
Certiorari Denied April 6, 1970.
See 90 S.Ct. 1281.
David Lawrence, pro se.
Paul E. Gifford, Miami, Fla. (Ct. Apptd.), for appellant.
Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen. of Florida, Miami, Fla., Arden M. Siegendorf, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, Fla., for appellee.
Before RIVES, BELL, and DYER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
This appeal, filed sixty three days after the denial of the petition for writ of habeas corpus, is dismissed. See Allen v. Wainwright, 5 Cir., 1967, 384 F.2d 745. There is no showing that the failure ,to file the notice of appeal within the extended time period of 30 days provided under Rule 4(a), Federal Rules Appellate Procedure, was attributable to anyone other than appellant. We thus deem the case of Fallen v. United States, 1964, 378 U.S. 139, 84 S.Ct. 1689, 12 L.Ed.2d 760, to be inapplicable.
As ,to appellant's right to file an additional petition for writ on the same or other grounds in the District Court, see Sanders v. United States, 1963, 373 U.S. 1, 83 S.Ct. 1068, 10 L.Ed.2d 148.
Appeal dismissed.
. This appeal was dismissed by order of this court dated September 25, 1968. Lawrence v. Wainwright, 5 Cir., 1968, 401 F.2d 177. That order was vacated on November 20, 1968. The court then ordered that the motion be carried with the ease for disposition. Council was appointed to represent appellant. Lawrence v. Wainwright, 5 Cir., 1968, 404 F.2d 614.