Case Name: William Scott DAVIS, II, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James A. HUNT, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-08-01
Citations: 667 F. App'x 426
Docket Number: No. 15-2476
Parties: William Scott DAVIS, II, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James A. HUNT, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 667
Pages: 426–427

Head Matter:
William Scott DAVIS, II, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James A. HUNT, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 15-2476
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 28, 2016
Decided: August 1, 2016
William Scott Davis, II, Appellant Pro Se. ■
Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
William Scott Davis, Jr., appeals the district court's orders denying his motions to reopen and to amend the judgment in a closed 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. Hunt, No. 5:11-cv-00035-D (E.D.N.C. Sept. 2, 2015; Nov. 23, 2015). We deny Davis' motions to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be fore this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED