Case Name: Tanya L. MARCHWINSKI, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Douglas E. HOWARD, in his Official Capacity as Director of the Family Independence Agency of Michigan, A Governmental Department of the State of Michigan, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-01-21
Citations: 319 F.3d 258
Docket Number: No. 00-2115
Parties: Tanya L. MARCHWINSKI, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Douglas E. HOWARD, in his Official Capacity as Director of the Family Independence Agency of Michigan, A Governmental Department of the State of Michigan, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: MARTIN, Chief Judge; BOGGS, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, MOORE, COLE, CLAY, GILMAN, GIBBONS, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 319
Pages: 258–259

Head Matter:
Tanya L. MARCHWINSKI, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Douglas E. HOWARD, in his Official Capacity as Director of the Family Independence Agency of Michigan, A Governmental Department of the State of Michigan, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 00-2115.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Jan. 21, 2003.
Before: MARTIN, Chief Judge; BOGGS, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, MOORE, COLE, CLAY, GILMAN, GIBBONS, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(a) provides as follows:
"The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal."
Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.
It is further ORDERED that the appellant and appellees file a supplemental brief not later than Monday, February 17, 2003.