Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Dana Williams, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1990-06-04
Citations: 162 A.D.2d 488
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dana Williams, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 162
Pages: 488–488

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dana Williams, Appellant.

Opinion:
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dunkin, J.), rendered March 20, 1984, convicting him of sexual abuse in the first degree and assault in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, the third and fourth counts of the indictment are dismissed, without prejudice to the People to re-present any appropriate charges to another Grand Jury (see, People v Beslanovics, 57 NY2d 726), and a new trial is ordered with respect to the remaining counts.
Reversal of the defendant's judgment of conviction is mandated by our prior holding, made on the appeal of the codefendant Vincent Dunlap, with whom the defendant was jointly tried, that the prosecutor's summation was so highly inflammatory and prejudicial as to deprive the defendants of a fair trial (see, People v Dunlap, 138 AD2d 393).
Because a new trial is required, we do not reach the defendant's remaining contention. Mangano, P. J., Lawrence, Balletta and O'Brien, JJ., concur.