Case Name: Wilkerson, Appellant, v. Mitchell, Warden, Appellee
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1999-10-13
Citations: 87 Ohio St. 3d 52
Docket Number: No. 99-1033
Parties: Wilkerson, Appellant, v. Mitchell, Warden, Appellee.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 87
Pages: 52–52

Head Matter:
Wilkerson, Appellant, v. Mitchell, Warden, Appellee.
[Cite as Wilkerson v. Mitchell (1999), 87 Ohio St.3d 52.]
(No. 99-1033
Submitted September 15, 1999
Decided October 13, 1999.)
Randolph D. Wilkerson, pro se.
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Michele M. Schoeppe, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. Wilkerson's claims challenge the validity and sufficiency of his indictment and are not cognizable in habeas corpus. See Shie v. Leonard (1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 160, 161, 702 N.E.2d 419, 420. Moreover, Wilkerson's robbery convictions were based on an indictment expressly charging him with those offenses.
Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.