Case Name: Ronald SCHAMING and Loretta Schaming, Individually and as husband and wife, Petitioners, v. SIMKINS INDUSTRIES, INC., a Connecticut Corporation, and John Sweeney, Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1977-03-10
Citations: 343 So. 2d 834
Docket Number: No. 49382
Parties: Ronald SCHAMING and Loretta Schaming, Individually and as husband and wife, Petitioners, v. SIMKINS INDUSTRIES, INC., a Connecticut Corporation, and John Sweeney, Respondents.
Judges: OVERTON, C. J., and ADKINS, ENGLAND, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and KARL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 343
Pages: 834–835

Head Matter:
Ronald SCHAMING and Loretta Schaming, Individually and as husband and wife, Petitioners, v. SIMKINS INDUSTRIES, INC., a Connecticut Corporation, and John Sweeney, Respondents.
No. 49382.
Supreme Court of Florida.
March 10, 1977.
Eugene C. Heiman, of Heiman & Hei-man, Miami, for petitioners.
Knight, Peters, Hoeveler, Pickle, Niem-oeller & Flynn, and Jeanne Heyward, Miami, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ. Upon further consideration of the cause, we conclude that no direct conflict of decisions exists as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.
It is so ordered.
OVERTON, C. J., and ADKINS, ENGLAND, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and KARL, JJ., concur.
BOYD, J., dissents.