Case Name: Spencer UTSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of SOUTH CAROLINA; Mayor of Bishopville, in individual and official capacity; Appellate Court; Sally Elliott, Attorney General; Lieber Death Row; Governor, in individual and official capacity; United States Supreme Court; President Obama, in individual and official capacity, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-06-06
Citations: 474 F. App'x 127
Docket Number: No. 12-6144
Parties: Spencer UTSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of SOUTH CAROLINA; Mayor of Bishopville, in individual and official capacity; Appellate Court; Sally Elliott, Attorney General; Lieber Death Row; Governor, in individual and official capacity; United States Supreme Court; President Obama, in individual and official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 474
Pages: 127–128

Head Matter:
Spencer UTSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of SOUTH CAROLINA; Mayor of Bishopville, in individual and official capacity; Appellate Court; Sally Elliott, Attorney General; Lieber Death Row; Governor, in individual and official capacity; United States Supreme Court; President Obama, in individual and official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 12-6144.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 31, 2012.
Decided: June 6, 2012.
Spencer Utsey, Appellant Pro Se.
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Spencer Utsey appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Utsey v. South Carolina, No. 8:11-cv-02264-JMC (D.S.C. Dec. 1, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.