Case Name: Theodore J. BRUECKMANN, Appellant, v. HARRIS PROPERTIES, INC., etc., et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1988-01-20
Citations: 518 So. 2d 467
Docket Number: No. 4-86-3114
Parties: Theodore J. BRUECKMANN, Appellant,v. HARRIS PROPERTIES, INC., etc., et al., Appellees.
Judges: DELL, WALDEN and STONE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 518
Pages: 467–467

Head Matter:
Theodore J. BRUECKMANN, Appellant,v. HARRIS PROPERTIES, INC., etc., et al., Appellees.
No. 4-86-3114.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jan. 20, 1988.
James C. Blecke and Susan S. Lemer, Miami, and Richard H. Willits of Easley, Massa & Willits, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Shelley H. Leinicke of Wicker, Smith, Blomqvist, Tutan, O’Hara, McCoy, Graham & Lane, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.
Glenn J. Webber of Ligman, Martin, Shi-ley, Neswiacheny & Evans, Fort Lauder-dale, for appellee Bullet Const.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Theodore J. Brueckmann, was a workman at a construction site. He was personally injured there when a wall toppled. He sued several defendants for damages. The trial court entered summary final judgment against Brueckmann. He appeals.
Upon review of the record and appellate advice, we are of the opinion that it was error to enter summary judgment in favor of Bonaventure, owner-builder, because there were genuine issues of material fact as to the status of Bonaventure, which status would impact upon Bonaventure's liability to Brueckmann. There were issues as to the cause of the topple and the negligence of Bonaventure.
We reverse the summary judgment in favor of Bonaventure and remand for further proceedings.
We affirm the summary judgment in favor of Bullet Construction, Inc.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part and REMANDED.
DELL, WALDEN and STONE, JJ., concur.