Case Name: Locust Club of Rochester et al., Appellants, v. City of Rochester et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1968-09-26
Citations: 22 N.Y.2d 894
Docket Number: 
Parties: Locust Club of Rochester et al., Appellants, v. City of Rochester et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 22
Pages: 894–894

Head Matter:
Locust Club of Rochester et al., Appellants, v. City of Rochester et al., Respondents.
Submitted September 24, 1968;
decided September 26, 1968.

Opinion:
Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there were presented and necessarily passed upon questions under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Plaintiffs argued that the ordinance creating the Police Advisory Board violated due process requirements in that the standards or norms of action were indefinite and vague ; denied equal protection under the law to police officers; permitted Bills of Attainder contrary to article I of the Constitution; and violated the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution. The Court of Appeals held plaintiffs' constitutional rights were not violated. [See 22 N Y 2d 802.]