Case Name: Claude Narracci, Respondent, v. John D. Brigati et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2008-12-09
Citations: 57 A.D.3d 632
Docket Number: 
Parties: Claude Narracci, Respondent, v John D. Brigati et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 57
Pages: 632–633

Head Matter:
Claude Narracci, Respondent, v John D. Brigati et al., Appellants.
[868 NYS2d 544]

Opinion:
A vehicle operated by the plaintiffs decedent collided with a vehicle operated by the defendant John D. Brigati and owned by the defendant White Fost Growers, Inc., at the intersection of Third Avenue and West Fulaski Road in Huntington. The plaintiffs decedent was traveling on Third Avenue, which was governed by a stop sign at its intersection with West Fulaski Road. The defendant driver was traveling on West Pulaski Road, which was not governed by a traffic control signal at its intersection with Third Avenue.
The defendants failed to submit evidence sufficient to establish their' entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]). Although the decedent's direction of travel was governed by a stop sign, triable issues of fact exist as to the facts surrounding the accident and whether the defendant driver was free of negligence (see Virzi v Fraser, 51 AD3d 784 [2008]; Campbell-Lopez v Cruz, 31 AD3d 475 [2006]; Hernandez v Bestway Beer & Soda Distrib., 301 AD2d 381 [2003]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendants' motion for summary judgment. Fisher, J.P., Angiolillo, Dickerson and Belen, JJ., concur.