Case Name: SOUTHERN OREGON BARTER FAIR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON; Jackson County Board of Commissioners; Jackson County Sheriffs Department; Ric Holt; Jack Walker; Sue Kupillas; Robert Kennedy, Defendants, and State of Oregon, Defendant-intervenor-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-03-24
Citations: 401 F.3d 1124
Docket Number: No. 02-35560
Parties: SOUTHERN OREGON BARTER FAIR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON; Jackson County Board of Commissioners; Jackson County Sheriffs Department; Ric Holt; Jack Walker; Sue Kupillas; Robert Kennedy, Defendants, and State of Oregon, Defendant-intervenor-Appellee.
Judges: Before: ALARCÓN, RAWLINSON, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 401
Pages: 1124–1129

Head Matter:
SOUTHERN OREGON BARTER FAIR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON; Jackson County Board of Commissioners; Jackson County Sheriffs Department; Ric Holt; Jack Walker; Sue Kupillas; Robert Kennedy, Defendants, and State of Oregon, Defendant-intervenor-Appellee.
No. 02-35560.
United States Gourt of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
March 24, 2005.
Christina Hutchins, Office of the Oregon Attorney General, Salem, OR, for Defendant-intervenor-Appellee.
Before: ALARCÓN, RAWLINSON, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
Judges Rawlinson and Bybee have voted to deny' the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge Alarcon so recommends.
The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc, and the matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
The petition for panel rehearing en banc, filed July 21, 2004, is DENIED.