Case Name: WYNNE v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1914-10-21
Citations: 170 S.W. 149
Docket Number: No. 3257
Parties: WYNNE v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 170
Pages: 149–150

Head Matter:
WYNNE v. STATE.
(No. 3257.)
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Oct. 21, 1914.)
Criminal Law (§ 1038*) — Appeal-Presentation Below — Instructions.
Objections to instructions in a criminal case cannot be considered on appeal, when not presented below at the proper time.
[Ed. Note. — Por other cases, see Criminal-Law, Cent. Dig. § 2646; Dec. Dig. § 1038.*].
Appeal from District Court, Walker County; S. W. Dean, Judge.
Arthur Wynne was convicted of stealing cattle and appeals.
Affirmed.
C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Opinion:
PRENDERGAST, P. J.
Appellant was convicted of the theft of cattle and the lowest punishment assessed.
The court gave a correct and apt charge to the jury. There is no bill of exceptions in the record. The only assignments in the motion for new trial are: First. The verdict was contrary to the law and evidence. We have carefully read the evidence and it is amply sufficient to sustain the conviction. Second. He attempts to complain of certain paragraphs of the court's charge. No objection whatever is shown to have been made to the charge at the proper time. The only complaint is made in the motion for new trial. Therefore, this complaint cannot be considered.
The judgment is therefore affirmed.