Case Name: G.M., the mother, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2018-10-10
Citations: 254 So. 3d 508
Docket Number: No. 4D18-2398
Parties: G.M., the mother, Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 254
Pages: 508–508

Head Matter:
G.M., the mother, Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.
No. 4D18-2398
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
[October 10, 2018]
Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, and Richard G. Bartmon, Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Fourth District, for appellant.
Andrew Feigenbaum of the Department of Children and Families, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
G.M., the mother, appeals an order requiring her to submit to a psychological evaluation as part of her case plan. The order does not contain the requisite findings that the mother's mental health was "in controversy" and that "good cause" was shown, see § 39.407(15) Fla. Stat. (2018) ; Fla. R. Juv. P. 8.250(b), nor does the record support such a finding, see Wade v. Wade , 124 So.3d 369, 374-75 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) ; Gasparino v. Murphy , 352 So.2d 933, 935 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977). We accept the state's concession of error and reverse and remand for the trial court to strike the psychological evaluation from the mother's case plan in the disposition order.
Reversed and remanded with instructions.
Gross, Taylor, and Levine, JJ., concur.