Case Name: Bruce LEVITT v. FAIRFIELD RESORTS, INC., et al.
Court: Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jurisdiction: Maryland
Decision Date: 2004-09-15
Citations: 383 Md. 209
Docket Number: No. 65
Parties: Bruce LEVITT v. FAIRFIELD RESORTS, INC., et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Maryland Reports
Volume: 383
Pages: 209–210

Head Matter:
857 A.2d 1128
Bruce LEVITT v. FAIRFIELD RESORTS, INC., et al.
No. 65,
Sept. Term, 2004.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Sept. 15, 2004.
Mihcael C. Worsham, Forest Hills, Scott C. Borison, Legg Law Firm, LLC, Frederick, for appellant.
Scott McIntosh, Karin M. Miller, John F. Dienelt, John J. Dwyer, Piper Rudnick L.L.P., Washington, DC, Vernon Scott Bailey, Asst. Atty. Gen., Baltimore, for appellees.
Submitted before BELL, C.J., RAKER, WILNER, CATHELL, HARRELL, BATTAGLIA, JOHN C. ELDRIDGE, (Retired, Specially Assigned), JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM ORDER
The Court having considered and granted the petition for a writ of certiorari in the above captioned case, it is this 15th day of September, 2004,
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the judgment of the Circuit Court for Montgomery County be, and it is hereby, vacated, and the case is remanded to the Circuit Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinions in Levitt v. Fax.com, Inc., 383 Md. 141, 857 A.2d 1089 (No. 21, September Term, 2003, filed September 13, 2004) and Ponte Architects, Ltd. v. Investors' Alert, Inc., 382 Md. 689, 857 A.2d 1 (2004). Costs to be paid by the DefendantAppellee, Fairfield Resorts, Inc.
/s/ ROBERT M. BELL
Chief Judge