Case Name: Maria FRANCO-WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-05-11
Citations: 96 F. App'x 533
Docket Number: No. 02-74393, INS A76-689688
Parties: Maria FRANCO-WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before WALLACE, KOZINSKI and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 96
Pages: 533–534

Head Matter:
Maria FRANCO-WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 02-74393, INS [ AXX-XXXXXX ].
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 15, 2004.
Decided May 11, 2004.
Martin Resendez Guajardo, Esq., Law Office of Martin Resendez Guajardo, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.
Regional Counsel, Western Region, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, San Francisco, CA, Elizabeth A. Kessler, Esq., Donald E. Keener, Esq., Michelle E. Gorden, Attorney, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before WALLACE, KOZINSKI and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
1. We deny Franco-Williams' petition for the reasons stated by the Board of Immigration Appeals in its disposition.
2. We deny Franco-Williams' motion to supplement the administrative record, as the supplement is unnecessary to our decision.
PETITION DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.