Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James ERWIN, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1996-03-06
Citations: 78 F.3d 232
Docket Number: No. 94-1766
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James ERWIN, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge; KENNEDY, MARTIN, MILBURN, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, MOORE, and COLE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 78
Pages: 232–233

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James ERWIN, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 94-1766.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
March 6, 1996.
Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge; KENNEDY, MARTIN, MILBURN, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, MOORE, and COLE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
Prior report: 71 F.3d 218.
A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this ease en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:
The effect of the granting of a hearing en bane shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.
The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.