Case Name: Peter F. Campbell, Respondent and Appellant, v. Nelson H. Tunnicliff, Appellant and Respondent; Thomas A. Campbell, Respondent and Appellant, v. Nelson H. Tunnicliff, Appellant and Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1919-11-25
Citations: 227 N.Y. 623
Docket Number: 
Parties: Peter F. Campbell, Respondent and Appellant, v. Nelson H. Tunnicliff, Appellant and Respondent. Thomas A. Campbell, Respondent and Appellant, v. Nelson H. Tunnicliff, Appellant and Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 227
Pages: 623–623

Head Matter:
Peter F. Campbell, Respondent and Appellant, v. Nelson H. Tunnicliff, Appellant and Respondent. Thomas A. Campbell, Respondent and Appellant, v. Nelson H. Tunnicliff, Appellant and Respondent.
Reported below, 185 App. Div. 506.
(Submitted November 17, 1919;
decided November 25, 1919.)
Motion in each of the above-entitled actions to dismiss the appeal of plaintiff from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 20, 1919, modifying and affirming as modified a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
The motions were made upon the ground of failure to file the required undertakings.
Francis S. Quinn for motions.
Leon N. Futter opposed.

Opinion:
Motions denied, without costs and undertaking filed and served November 11, 1919, deemed permitted under-section 1303 of the Code of Civil Procedure.