Case Name: In re Application of Parry
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1995-03-30
Citations: 72 Ohio St. 3d 75
Docket Number: No. 95-354
Parties: In re Application of Parry.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 72
Pages: 75–77

Head Matter:
In re Application of Parry.
[Cite as In re Application of Parry (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 75.]
(No. 95-354
Submitted March 21, 1995
Decided March 30, 1995.)
Charles W. Kettlewell, for the applicant.
Harris, McClellan, Binan & Cox and John D. Hvizdos; Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease and Charles A. Schneider, for the Admissions Committee of the Columbus Bar Association.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We have reviewed the record in this case and agree with the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Parry is not approved for admission to the practice of law in Ohio. However, irrespective of filing deadlines, Parry may reapply for admission and to take the July 1995 bar examination, the approval of which applications shall remain subject to a favorable evaluation of Parry's character and fitness.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.