Case Name: Christopher M. HUTCHINSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Alton BASKERVILLE, Warden PCC, Virginia Parole Board, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-03-15
Citations: 5 F. App'x 299
Docket Number: No. 00-7306
Parties: Christopher M. HUTCHINSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Alton BASKERVILLE, Warden PCC, Virginia Parole Board, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 5
Pages: 299–300

Head Matter:
Christopher M. HUTCHINSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Alton BASKERVILLE, Warden PCC, Virginia Parole Board, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 00-7306.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 8, 2001.
Decided March 15, 2001.
Brent Alan Jackson, Jackson, Pickus & Associates, P.C., Richmond, VA, for appellant. Richard Carson Vorhis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for appellee.
Before DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Christopher M. Hutchinson seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Hutchinson v. Baskerville, No. CA-99-1675-AM (E.D.Va. Aug. 10, 2000); see Warren v. Baskerville, 233 F.3d 204, 206-08 (4th Cir.2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.