Case Name: Alton JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-10-16
Citations: 828 So. 2d 1054
Docket Number: Nos. 2D02-3810 to 2D01-3812
Parties: Alton JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ALTENBERND, WHATLEY, and NORTHCUTT, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 828
Pages: 1054–1054

Head Matter:
Alton JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Nos. 2D02-3810 to 2D01-3812.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Oct. 16, 2002.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Alton Jackson challenges the trial court's order summarily denying his' motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm.
In his motion, Jackson alleged that his plea was involuntary because defense counsel affirmatively misadvised him regarding the future sentencing-enhancing effects of the plea in regard to an as yet uncommitted crime. In Stansel v. State, 825 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), we held that this claim is not cognizable in a rule 3.850 motion. We certify the same question that we certified in Stansel. We affirm, without discussion, any other issues raised by Jackson in his motion.
ALTENBERND, WHATLEY, and NORTHCUTT, JJ., Concur.