Case Name: Disciplinary Counsel v. Bunstine
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2016-04-29
Citations: 146 Ohio St. 3d 1229
Docket Number: Nos. 2012-2049 and 2014-1392
Parties: Disciplinary Counsel v. Bunstine.
Judges: O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 146
Pages: 1229–1230

Head Matter:
Disciplinary Counsel v. Bunstine.
2016-Ohio-2735.]
(Nos. 2012-2049 and 2014-1392
— Submitted April 26, 2016
— Decided April 29, 2016.)

Opinion:
{¶ 1} These causes came on for further consideration upon the filing of applications for reinstatement by respondent, Edward Royal Bunstine, Attorney Registration No. 0030127, last known business address in Chillicothe, Ohio.
{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of August 28, 2013, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year with six months stayed on condition, and its order of September 16, 2015, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of six months, finds that respondent has substantially complied with those orders and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24).
{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.
{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2).
O'Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O'Neill, JJ., concur.