Case Name: Dion Wyvis COLEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carolyn TUCKER, LPN; J. Castanza; Dr. Scott, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-05-02
Citations: 127 F. App'x 112
Docket Number: No. 04-7966
Parties: Dion Wyvis COLEMAN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Carolyn TUCKER, LPN; J. Castanza; Dr. Scott, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 127
Pages: 112–113

Head Matter:
Dion Wyvis COLEMAN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Carolyn TUCKER, LPN; J. Castanza; Dr. Scott, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 04-7966.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 22, 2005.
Decided: May 2, 2005.
Dion Wyvis Coleman, Appellant pro se.
Donna L. Foster, Rodney Kyle Adams, Anne Catherine Cardea, Leclair Ryan, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Dion Wyvis Coleman appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Coleman v. Tucker, No. CA-03-131-2 (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 16, 2004 & entered Nov. 17, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED