Case Name: In the Matter of Tristan E. Ragsdale, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. TRISTAN E. RAGSDALE, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2006-12-06
Citations: 209 Or. App. 592
Docket Number: 05374-MC; A129912
Parties: In the Matter of Tristan E. Ragsdale, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. TRISTAN E. RAGSDALE, Appellant.
Judges: Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Armstrong and Rosenblum, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 209
Pages: 592–593

Head Matter:
Submitted on record and briefs October 6,
reversed December 6, 2006
In the Matter of Tristan E. Ragsdale, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. TRISTAN E. RAGSDALE, Appellant.
05374-MC; A129912
149 P3d 211
James A. Palmer filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Laura S. Anderson, Senior Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Armstrong and Rosenblum, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Appellant in this mental commitment case appeals a judgment committing him to the Mental Health Division for treatment for a period of time not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. The trial court found that appellant suffers from a mental disorder and is dangerous to others. A discussion of the facts would be of no benefit to the bench and bar. The state concedes that the record lacks clear and convincing evidence that defendant's mental illness has caused him to be dangerous to others. We find the state's concession to be well-founded and therefore accept it.
Reversed.