Case Name: Patrick Timothy JEFFERS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. C. ALLEN, Warden of Haynesville C.C., Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-12-12
Citations: 671 F. App'x 140
Docket Number: No. 16-6510
Parties: Patrick Timothy JEFFERS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. C. ALLEN, Warden of Haynesville C.C., Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. '
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 671
Pages: 140–140

Head Matter:
Patrick Timothy JEFFERS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. C. ALLEN, Warden of Haynesville C.C., Respondent-Appellee.
No. 16-6510
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: November 21, 2016
Decided: December 12, 2016
Patrick Timothy Jeffers, Appellant Pro Se. Craig Stallard, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. '

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. -
PER CURIAM:
Patrick Timothy Jeffers seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of ap-pealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.
We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Jeffers has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Jeffers' motion to appoint counsel and motion for a temporary stay, deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED