Case Name: FISCHER, Respondent, v. CONHAIM et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1901-06
Citations: 72 N.Y.S. 1102
Docket Number: 
Parties: FISCHER, Respondent, v. CONHAIM et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 72
Pages: 1102–1102

Head Matter:
FISCHER, Respondent, v. CONHAIM et al., Appellants.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
June, 1901.)
Action by Max Fischer against .Joseph Conhaim and others.
H. V. Rutherford, for appellants. J. Wilkenfeld, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The nonpayment of the bonus was by the contract of employment made dependent upon an exercise by the defendants of their reserved right to discharge the plaintiff within the year. He was not discharged, but served the full term, without any expression of dissatisfaction. He was, therefore, entitled to the extra compensation. Judgment <(71 N. Y. Supp. 315) affirmed, with costs.