Case Name: Jeffrey DUNN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2016-02-12
Citations: 185 So. 3d 694
Docket Number: No. 5D14-4272
Parties: Jeffrey DUNN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: LAWSON, C.J., TORPY.and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 185
Pages: 694–695

Head Matter:
Jeffrey DUNN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D14-4272.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Feb. 12, 2016.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Lisa A. Haskins, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marjorie Vincent-Tripp, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
After' conducting a hearing, the lower court concluded that Appellant violated three conditions of his probation. He only-challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the Condition 5 violation. We affirm. See Bell v. State, 179 So.3d 349 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015). We acknowledge conflict with Queior v. State, 157 So.3d 370 (Fla. 2d DCA), review granted, 171 So.3d 120 (Fla.2015).
Appellant also challenges the imposition of Condition 30 in the probation1 order. Appellee correctly concedes error on this point. Witchard v. State, 68 So.3d 407, 410 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). Accordingly, we strike Condition 30 from the probation order.
AFFIRMED; CONDITION 30 STRICKEN.
LAWSON, C.J., TORPY.and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.