Case Name: John Wayne SPELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1999-01-15
Citations: 731 So. 2d 9
Docket Number: No. 97-00572
Parties: John Wayne SPELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: PARKER, C.J., and QUINCE, PEGGY A., Associate Judge, Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 731
Pages: 9–11

Head Matter:
John Wayne SPELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 97-00572.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Jan. 15, 1999.
Rehearing Denied April 20, 1999.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Patricia A. Paterson, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ann Pfeiffer Corcoran, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
John Wayne Spell challenges the imposition of forty victim injury points on the scoresheet prepared on resentencing after his violation of community control. Because we find that the trial court should have corrected Spell's scoresheet by deletion of the victim injury points, we reverse.
Spell relies on this court's opinion in Wright v. State, 707 So.2d 385 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), to advance his argument that a scoresheet error is reviewable at resen-tencing after a community control violation, even when there was no objection at the original sentencing. This case is indistinguishable from Wright; therefore, Spell must be sentenced under a scoresheet that does not include these victim injury points.
We recognize that this decision is in conflict with the First District Court of Appeal's opinion in Fitzhugh v. State, 698 So.2d 571 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). In Fitz-hugh the defendant, citing Karchesky, challenged the imposition of forty points for victim injury on his original guidelines scoresheet. In reliance on State v. Montague, 682 So.2d 1085 (Fla.1996), the court affirmed the imposition of the points, reasoning that "an appeal from re-sentencing following violation of probation is not the proper time to assert an error in the original scoresheet."
Therefore, we reverse the sentence imposed and remand for resentencing with a corrected scoresheet.
PARKER, C.J., and QUINCE, PEGGY A., Associate Judge, Concur.
ALTENBERND, J., dissents with opinion.
. Karchesky v. State, 591 So.2d 930 (Fla. 1992).