Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Moses Padro, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1990-02-08
Citations: 75 N.Y.2d 820
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Moses Padro, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 75
Pages: 820–821

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Moses Padro, Appellant.
Argued January 4, 1990;
decided February 8, 1990
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Myron Beldock and Lee F. Bantle for appellant.
Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney (Patrick J. Hynes and Donald J. Siewert of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed. A postverdict motion made pursuant to CPL 330.30 is not, by itself, ordinarily sufficient to preserve a "question of law" within the meaning of CPL 470.05 (2) and inasmuch as defendant failed to make appropriate objections during trial, the points presented by defendant are not preserved for review in this court.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa. Taking no part: Judge Alexander.