Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Ernest Frederick HODGES, Jr., Defendant - Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-09-24
Citations: 294 F. App'x 46
Docket Number: No. 08-6809
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Ernest Frederick HODGES, Jr., Defendant — Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 294
Pages: 46–46

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Ernest Frederick HODGES, Jr., Defendant — Appellant.
No. 08-6809.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 22, 2008.
Decided: Sept. 24, 2008.
Ernest Frederick Hodges, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Andrew Bassford, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Ernest Frederick Hodges, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court order denying his motion for discovery in his previously closed criminal case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hodges, No. 7:05-cr-00040-sgw-1 (W.D.Va. Nov. 30, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.