Case Name: Mary Raleigh, as Administratrix of the Estate of Dennis Raleigh, Deceased, Appellant, v. John B. Payne, as United States Director-General of Railways, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1922-02-03
Citations: 232 N.Y. 617
Docket Number: 
Parties: Mary Raleigh, as Administratrix of the Estate of Dennis Raleigh, Deceased, Appellant, v. John B. Payne, as United States Director-General of Railways, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 232
Pages: 617–618

Head Matter:
Mary Raleigh, as Administratrix of the Estate of Dennis Raleigh, Deceased, Appellant, v. John B. Payne, as United States Director-General of Railways, Respondent.
Negligence — carriers—ferries — driver of wagon thrown from seat and hilled while a passenger on a ferryboat — alleged defective condition of planking — insufficiency of evidence to warrant recovery.
Raleigh v. Hines, 194 App. Div. 592, affirmed.
(Argued January 18, 1922;
decided February 3, 1922.)
Appeal from a judgment,' entered February 21, 1921, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and directing a dismissal of the complaint in an action to recover for the death of plaintiff’s intestate alleged to have been occasioned through the negligence of the defendant. The complaint alleged that decedent was a passenger on the ferryboat Rochester, on a truck drawn by four horses which he was driving and that while said ferryboat was attached to the pier or slip at Weehawken, N. J., deceased was thrown from his seat on the truck to the deck of the ferryboat and killed, due to the negligence and carelessness of the defendant and its employees in permitting the planks composing the deck of said ferryboat to remain in a defective and worn condition and to be insecurely fastened and to remain in that condition with knowledge thereof and in failing to maintain a suitable inspection of the condition of said planks. The Appellate Division held that there was no sufficient evidence to show that the defective condition of the planks was the cause of decedent’s fall.
Alfred M. Bailey and Martin Bourke for appellant.
William Mann and Alex S. Lyman for respondent.

Opinion:
judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ. Absent: Hogan, J.