Case Name: Howard E. McPHERSON, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Norma McPHERSON, Appellee/Cross-Appellant
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2001-10-10
Citations: 796 So. 2d 1230
Docket Number: No. 4D00-1688
Parties: Howard E. McPHERSON, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Norma McPHERSON, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
Judges: KLEIN, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 796
Pages: 1230–1230

Head Matter:
Howard E. McPHERSON, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Norma McPHERSON, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
No. 4D00-1688.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Oct. 10, 2001.
David J. Schottenfeld of David J. Schot-tenfeld, P.A., Plantation, for appellant.
Robert L. Bogen of Law Offices of Brav-erman & Rossi, Boca Raton, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This case involves a seven and a half year marriage between a sixty-seven year old husband and a sixty-five year old wife. The marriage was the second for the husband and the fifth for the wife. We affirm the trial court's well crafted final judgment in all respects but one — we remand to correct a mathematical error in the cash equalization payment ordered by the court as part of the equitable distribution scheme. The payment should have been $96,379 rather than $93,379. See Banton v. Parker-Banton, 756 So.2d 155, 156 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (remanding, in part, to correct mathematical error).
KLEIN, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.