Case Name: Linda Anderson NEWTON, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Michael K. TAYLOR, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-08-19
Citations: 113 S.W.3d 244
Docket Number: Nos. ED 82252, ED 82523
Parties: Linda Anderson NEWTON, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Michael K. TAYLOR, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 113
Pages: 244–245

Head Matter:
Linda Anderson NEWTON, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Michael K. TAYLOR, Defendant/Appellant.
Nos. ED 82252, ED 82523.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Aug. 19, 2003.
Daniel E. Wilke, Wilke & Wilke, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Michael R. Gibbons, Gibbons, Gibbons & Howard, P.C., Kirkwood, MO, for respondent.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant, Michael Taylor, appeals the trial court's judgment denying his motion to set aside a default judgment. We find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).