Case Name: Gerry C. DUBOSE, Appellant, v. Jennifer L. CAREY; John D. Kelly; Hanft, Fride, O'Brien, Harries, Swelbar & Burns, P.A., Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-06-08
Citations: 326 F. App'x 408
Docket Number: No. 09-1050
Parties: Gerry C. DUBOSE, Appellant, v. Jennifer L. CAREY; John D. Kelly; Hanft, Fride, O’Brien, Harries, Swelbar & Burns, P.A., Appellees.
Judges: Before RILEY, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 326
Pages: 408–409

Head Matter:
Gerry C. DUBOSE, Appellant, v. Jennifer L. CAREY; John D. Kelly; Hanft, Fride, O’Brien, Harries, Swelbar & Burns, P.A., Appellees.
No. 09-1050.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: June 4, 2009.
Filed: June 8, 2009.
Gerry C. DuBose, Brooklyn Park, MN, pro se.
Steven Wayne Schneider, Schneider Law Office, Duluth, MN, for Appellees.
Before RILEY, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Nearly two years after this court affirmed the adverse judgment in Gerry Du-Bose's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Jennifer Carey, John Kelly, and their law firm, see DuBose v. Carey, 204 Fed.Appx. 579 (8th Cir.2006) (unpublished per cu-riam), DuBose filed a motion for relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b), restating theories he had advanced earlier without success. The district court denied DuBose's motion, finding it untimely and without merit. He appeals, and, following careful review, we find no abuse of discretion. See Middleton v. McDonald, 388 F.3d 614, 616 (8th Cir.2004) (standard of review).
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.