Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michelle Hardin MASSEY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-07-08
Citations: 328 F. App'x 178
Docket Number: No. 09-6616
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michelle Hardin MASSEY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 328
Pages: 178–178

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michelle Hardin MASSEY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-6616.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 19, 2009.
Decided: July 8, 2009.
Michelle Hardin Massey, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michelle Hardin Massey appeals the district court's order denying her motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006)0001. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Massey, No. 3:00-cr-00210-GCM-CH-3 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 12, 2009)USCA. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.