Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Godofredo MARTINEZ-LUVIANOS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-08-18
Citations: 612 F. App'x 797
Docket Number: No. 14-10783
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Godofredo MARTINEZ-LUVIANOS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before JOLLY, GRAVES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 612
Pages: 797–798

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Godofredo MARTINEZ-LUVIANOS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 14-10783
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 18, 2015.
James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Jerry Van Beard, Esq., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Dallas, TX Helen Miller Liggett, Esq., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Lubbock, TX for Defendant-Appellant.
Before JOLLY, GRAVES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Godofredo Martinez-Luvianos has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Martinez-Luvianos has not filed a response, has completed the confinement portion of his sentence, and has been removed from the United States. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presenta no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as frivolous, see 5th Cm. R. 42.2, and in part as moot, see United States v. Rosenbaums-Alanis, 483 F.3d 381, 382-83 (5th Cir.2007).
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.