Case Name: DIVISION OF LAND MANAGEMENT, Petitioner v. Elroy J. SMITH, Respondent
Court: Oneida Tribal Judicial System, Trial Court
Jurisdiction: Tribal Jurisdictions
Decision Date: 2010-01-15
Citations: 10 Am. Tribal Law 110
Docket Number: No. 09-TC-020
Parties: DIVISION OF LAND MANAGEMENT, Petitioner v. Elroy J. SMITH, Respondent.
Judges: Judicial Officers MARY ADAMS, SANDRA SKENADORE, and LELAND WIGG-NINHAM, presiding.
Reporter: West's American Tribal Law Reporter
Volume: 10
Pages: 110–110

Head Matter:
DIVISION OF LAND MANAGEMENT, Petitioner v. Elroy J. SMITH, Respondent.
No. 09-TC-020.
Oneida Tribal Judicial System, Trial Court.
Jan. 15, 2010.
Judicial Officers MARY ADAMS, SANDRA SKENADORE, and LELAND WIGG-NINHAM, presiding.

Opinion:
Decision
This case has come before the Oneida Tribal Judicial System, Trial Court.
I Background
This case involves a request for the foreclosure of the property located at 1327 Baumgart Road, Green Bay, Wisconsin.
On March 25, 2009 Petitioner, Division of Land Management, filed a foreclosure complaint against Respondent, Elroy J. Smith, claiming a debt owed in the amount of $5,053.52.
A Pre-trial hearing was scheduled for April 30, 2009. At the Pre-trial the parties submitted a Stipulation and Order for Settlement. The court granted the party's Stipulation.
On July 29, 2009 Petitioner filed a Motion to Reopen Contested Case. A trial was scheduled for September 15, 2009 at 900 a.m. At the trial Petitioner requested a Motion to Stay the foreclosure to allow Respondent additional time to cure his debt. If this debt is not cured this case may proceed into a foreclosure hearing scheduled for November 10, 2009.
On November 10, 2009 at the hearing, Petitioner requested a 30-day Stay because the Respondent is ill. In addition, Petitioner will be amending their complaint to project an accurate obligation for Respondents.
On December 22, 2009 the parties requested a 30-day Stay the eviction to allow Respondent additional time to cure his debt. If this debt is not cured this case may proceed to a foreclosure hearing scheduled for January 26, 2010.
On January 14, 2010 Petitioner submitted a Motion to Dismiss without prejudice.
II Decision
The court grants Petitioner's Motion to Dismiss without prejudice.