Case Name: Daniel K. OGLESBY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-05-24
Citations: 168 S.W.3d 605
Docket Number: No. ED 84837
Parties: Daniel K. OGLESBY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 168
Pages: 605–606

Head Matter:
Daniel K. OGLESBY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 84837.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
May 24, 2005.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 18, 2005.
Application for Transfer Denied Aug. 30, 2005.
Amy M. Bartholow, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Deborah Daniels, Karen L. Kramer, Asst. Attys. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Daniel K. Oglesby, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties and find that the motion court's judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).