Case Name: Justo CARABALLO, et ux., Appellants, v. RIVERHOUSE APARTMENTS CO., et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-07-05
Citations: 545 So. 2d 516
Docket Number: No. 89-357
Parties: Justo CARABALLO, et ux., Appellants, v. RIVERHOUSE APARTMENTS CO., et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before HUBBART, LEVY and GERSTEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 545
Pages: 516–516

Head Matter:
Justo CARABALLO, et ux., Appellants, v. RIVERHOUSE APARTMENTS CO., et al., Appellees.
No. 89-357.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 5, 1989.
Grimmett & Korthals and Ralph L. McGrath, Jr., Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.
Wicker, Smith, Blomqvist, Tutan, O’Hara, McCoy, Graham & Lane and Shelley H. Leinicke, Fort Lauderdale, for appel-lees.
Before HUBBART, LEVY and GERSTEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. City of Boca Raton v. Mattef, 91 So.2d 644 (Fla.1956) (en banc); Stewart v. Texas Co., 67 So.2d 653 (Fla.1953); Florida Power and Light Co. v. Lively, 465 So.2d 1270 (Fla. 3d DCA) (en banc), pet. for review denied, 476 So.2d 674 (Fla.1985); Dougherty v. Hernando County, 419 So.2d 679 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); Zipkin v. Rubin Construction Co., 418 So.2d 1040 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Marks v. Delcastillo, 386 So.2d 1259 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); State ex rel. Boyles v. Sinter, 363 So.2d 357 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978).