Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Alford Horsford, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2009-12-17
Citations: 68 A.D.3d 556
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alford Horsford, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 68
Pages: 556–557

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alford Horsford, Appellant.
[889 NYS2d 844]

Opinion:
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury's determinations concerning credibility and identification, including its resolution of alleged inconsistencies in testimony. The identification was particularly reliable because the undercover officer followed defendant after the sale and led the field team to him. Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Mazzarelli, Nardelli, Acosta and Román, JJ.