Case Name: Mirta L. De ARCE, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Luis Angel Diaz De Arce, Appellant, v. Ignacio PEREZ and Wilfredo Perez, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-09-07
Citations: 623 So. 2d 829
Docket Number: No. 92-1409
Parties: Mirta L. De ARCE, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Luis Angel Diaz De Arce, Appellant, v. Ignacio PEREZ and Wilfredo Perez, Appellees.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and HUBBART, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 623
Pages: 829–830

Head Matter:
Mirta L. De ARCE, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Luis Angel Diaz De Arce, Appellant, v. Ignacio PEREZ and Wilfredo Perez, Appellees.
No. 92-1409.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Sept. 7, 1993.
Grover, Ciment, Weinstein, Stauber & Friedman, Miami Beach, Hardy & Bissett and G. William Bissett, Miami, for appellant.
Conroy, Simberg & Lewis, Robert I. Buchsbaum and Dale L. Friedman, Hollywood, for appellees.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and HUBBART, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Fisher v. Shenandoah Gen. Constr. Co., 498 So.2d 882 (Fla.1986); Hoyt v. Corbett, 559 So.2d 98, 100 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 569 So.2d 1278 (Fla.1990); Weller v. Reitz, 419 So.2d 739 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); Pino v. Lopez, 361 So.2d 192 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 365 So.2d 714 (Fla.1978); Freeman v. Equilease Corp., 346 So.2d 619 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Sherman v. Weintraub, 132 So.2d 421 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.510(e); § 440.09(1), Fla.Stat. (1989).