Case Name: Anna L. SAMPSON & Ruth L. Sampson, Appellants, v. CITY OF BRENTWOOD & Pace-Brentwood Partners, L.L.C., Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-03-16
Citations: 135 S.W.3d 443
Docket Number: No. ED 83388
Parties: Anna L. SAMPSON & Ruth L. Sampson, Appellants, v. CITY OF BRENTWOOD & Pace-Brentwood Partners, L.L.C., Respondents.
Judges: Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, C.J., MARY R. RUSSELL, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 135
Pages: 443–444

Head Matter:
Anna L. SAMPSON & Ruth L. Sampson, Appellants, v. CITY OF BRENTWOOD & Pace-Brentwood Partners, L.L.C., Respondents.
No. ED 83388.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
March 16, 2004.
Rehearing Denied May 13, 2004.
Coggan R. Mills, Clayton, MO, for appellants.
Joann Sandifer, Clayton, MO, for respondents.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, C.J., MARY R. RUSSELL, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Anna Sampson and Ruth Sampson (hereinafter and collectively, "Sampson") appeal from the trial court's judgment dismissing their petition with prejudice for failing to state a cognizable claim upon which relief could be granted. Sampson raises two points on appeal. First, Sampson argues the trial court erred in dismissing her petition because it sufficiently pleaded a cause of action for fraudulent concealment. Second, Sampson argues the petition adequately pleaded the City of Brentwood bestowed a gift of a public street to Paee-Brentwood Partners LLP in violation of the Missouri Constitution.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcript on appeal and find no error. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion, only for the use of the parties, setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).