Case Name: Antwone D. IRVING, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2013-04-16
Citations: 397 S.W.3d 538
Docket Number: No. ED 98889
Parties: Antwone D. IRVING, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 397
Pages: 538–539

Head Matter:
Antwone D. IRVING, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 98889.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
April 16, 2013.
Lisa M. Stroup, St. Louis, MO, for Mov-ant/Appellant.
Andrew C. Hooper, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent/Respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Antwone D. Irving appeals from the motion court's denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.15. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2011, unless otherwise indicated.