Case Name: In re Nathalie ROYOT, Veronique Marty, Celine Moguen, and Guillaume Jarry
Court: Louisiana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 2003-01-10
Citations: 834 So. 2d 427
Docket Number: No. 2002-OB-2623
Parties: In re Nathalie ROYOT, Veronique Marty, Celine Moguen, and Guillaume Jarry.
Judges: 
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 834
Pages: 427–428

Head Matter:
In re Nathalie ROYOT, Veronique Marty, Celine Moguen, and Guillaume Jarry.
No. 2002-OB-2623.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Jan. 10, 2003.

Opinion:
In re Royot, Nathalie; Marty, Vero-nique; Moguen, Celine; Jarry, Guill-aume; — Plaintiffs); Applying for Permission to Take Bar Examination.
Not considered. As to petitioners Na-thalie Royot, Veronique Marty, and Celine Moguen, there has been no showing that their qualifications for admission have changed since this Court denied their prior applications. In the absence of such a showing, this Court will not consider a new application from these petitioners. As to petitioner Guillaume Jarry, the application is premature, as there is no indication petitioner has applied for admission to the Committee on Bar Admissions. See Supreme Court Rule XVII.