Case Name: George ROBINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-11-28
Citations: 34 S.W.3d 208
Docket Number: No. ED 77366
Parties: George ROBINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER, III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 34
Pages: 208–208

Head Matter:
George ROBINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 77366.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Nov. 28, 2000.
Jennifer S. Walsh, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER, III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
George Robinson (Movant) appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29 .15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirmed Movant's convictions for first degree assault, section 565.050, RSMo 1994, and armed criminal action, section 571.015, RSMo 1994, on direct appeal. State v. Robinson, 970 S.W.2d 840 (Mo.App. E.D.1998).
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).