Case Name: Gilbert v. Eigner
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1914-03-24
Citations: 90 Ohio St. 406
Docket Number: No. 13965
Parties: Gilbert v. Eigner.
Judges: Johnson, Donai-iue, Wanamaker, Newman and Wilkin, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, New Service
Volume: 90
Pages: 406–406

Head Matter:
No. 13965.
Gilbert v. Eigner.
Decided March 24, 1914.
Error to Circuit Court of Portage county.
Messrs. Siddall & Hanselman, for plaintiff in error.
Mr. C. H. Curtiss, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed. See journal entry.
It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said circuit court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed; upon the first error assigned by the circuit court for reversal of the judgment, to-wit: That "the court erred in sustaining questions propounded to Peter W. Eigner, as follows : What do you say as to what the usual, ordinary commission is for the sale of secondhand electric machines?' and also, What would you say it was?' " This court finds from the record that no other error intervened in the trial of said cause in the common pleas court.
Johnson, Donai-iue, Wanamaker, Newman and Wilkin, JJ., concur.