Case Name: WILLIAM HAYTKO, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM CRABB AND CO., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1952-09-16
Citations: 21 N.J. Super. 330
Docket Number: 
Parties: WILLIAM HAYTKO, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM CRABB AND CO., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 21
Pages: 330–330

Head Matter:
WILLIAM HAYTKO, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM CRABB AND CO., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued September 8, 1952
Decided September 16, 1952.
Before Judges Jayne, Peoctob, and Schettino.
Mr. Marshall Crowley argued the cause fox appellant (Messrs. Toner, Crowley •& Aclcerman, attorneys; Mr. Robert A. Vanderbilt, on the brief).
Mr. Harry Cohn argued the cause for respondent.

Opinion:
The opinion of the court was delivered
Pee Ctjbiam.
We concur in the conclusion expressed by Judge Erancis and reported in 17 N. J. Super. 95 (Co. Ct., Law Div., 1951).
Affirmed.