Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Mitchael O. SMITH, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2016-11-01
Citations: 502 S.W.3d 88
Docket Number: No. ED103957
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Mitchael O. SMITH, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Colleen Dolan, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 502
Pages: 88–89

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Mitchael O. SMITH, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED103957
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Filed: November 1, 2016
Richard A. Starnes, Jefferson City, MO, for Plaintiff/Respondent
William J. Swift, Woodrail Centre, Columbia, for Defendant/Appellant
Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Colleen Dolan, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Mitchael 0. Smith appeals from the trial court's judgment convicting him of possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's denial of Appellant's motion to suppress was supported by substantial evidence. State v. Ross, 254 S.W.3d 267, 272 (Mo. App. E.D. 2008). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).