Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Damien NELSON, a/k/a Griz, a/k/a Grizzle, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-08-02
Citations: 235 F. App'x 113
Docket Number: No. 07-6849
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Damien NELSON, a/k/a Griz, a/k/a Grizzle, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before TRAXLER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 235
Pages: 113–113

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Damien NELSON, a/k/a Griz, a/k/a Grizzle, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 07-6849.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 20, 2007.
Decided: Aug. 2, 2007.
Damien Nelson, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Spodick Healey, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before TRAXLER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Damien Nelson appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Nelson, No. 3:95-cr-00051-nkm (W.D.Va. May 10, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.