Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Margaret Lou MORSETTE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-07-09
Citations: 285 F. App'x 401
Docket Number: No. 07-30159
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Margaret Lou MORSETTE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: REINHARDT, LEAVY, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 285
Pages: 401–401

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Margaret Lou MORSETTE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-30159.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 18, 2008.
Filed July 9, 2008.
Joseph E. Thaggard, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Great Falls, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Chad Wright, Esq., Helena, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: REINHARDT, LEAVY, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Margaret Lou Morsette appeals from the 108-month sentence imposed following her guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess methamphetamine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Morsette contends that her sentence is unreasonable because the district court focused most of its 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) analysis on the nature and circumstances of the offense rather than on her personal characteristics. We conclude that the district court did not procedurally err and that the 108-month sentence is substantively reasonable. See Gall v. United, States, — U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 586, 596-98,169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.