Case Name: Maria R. BARRERA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Patricia GETTY, Ph.D., Acting Division Director; Beverly Fallik, Ph.D., Acting Branch Chief; Nancy Kennedy, Dr., P.H. Senior Public Health Advisor; Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; United States of America, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-12-23
Citations: 358 F. App'x 405
Docket Number: No. 09-2098
Parties: Maria R. BARRERA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Patricia GETTY, Ph.D., Acting Division Director; Beverly Fallik, Ph.D., Acting Branch Chief; Nancy Kennedy, Dr., P.H. Senior Public Health Advisor; Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; United States of America, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 358
Pages: 405–406

Head Matter:
Maria R. BARRERA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Patricia GETTY, Ph.D., Acting Division Director; Beverly Fallik, Ph.D., Acting Branch Chief; Nancy Kennedy, Dr., P.H. Senior Public Health Advisor; Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; United States of America, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 09-2098.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 17, 2009.
Decided: Dec. 23, 2009.
Maria R. Barrera, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Harold Barnard, Allen F. Loucks, Assistant United States Attorneys, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Maria R. Barrera appeals the district court's order granting Defendants' motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Barrera v. Getty, No. 8:08-cv-03347-PJM, 2009 WL 2499381 (D.Md. Aug. 13, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.