Case Name: Francis H. Townsend, Respondent, v. Mary Van Buskirk et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Julia Mary Snell
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1900-06
Citations: 52 A.D. 624
Docket Number: 
Parties: Francis H. Townsend, Respondent, v. Mary Van Buskirk et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Julia Mary Snell.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 52
Pages: 624–624

Head Matter:
Francis H. Townsend, Respondent, v. Mary Van Buskirk et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Julia Mary Snell.

Opinion:
The statute overlooked by counsel can be brought to the attention of the Special Term upon'the new trial, which has been ordered. All the rights of the plaintiff may thus be preserved. The omission is not deemed a sufficient reason for granting a new argument after a lapse of two and a half years and after so great a change as has taken place in the constitution of this court. Motion for reargument denied.