Case Name: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent, v. Alma MACK, Petitioner
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2000-12-20
Citations: 564 Pa. 2
Docket Number: Petition No. 915 Eastern District Allocatur 1999
Parties: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent, v. Alma MACK, Petitioner.
Judges: 
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 564
Pages: 2–2

Head Matter:
764 A.2d 1
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent, v. Alma MACK, Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Dec. 20, 2000.
Glen H. Ridenour II, Philadelphia, for petitioner.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
AND NOW, this 20th day of December, 2000, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, limited to the following issue:
Did the Superior Court err in affirming the trial court's denial of Petitioner's motion to suppress evidence seized as a result of the search of her luggage, based on the court's determination that Petitioner validly consented to the search of her luggage when, after confining her in the airport security office, the police told her that she could consent to an immediate search or they would get a warrant?