Case Name: Swaisgood, Appellee, v. Puder et al.; Verizon North, Inc., Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2008-07-02
Citations: 118 Ohio St. 3d 445
Docket Number: No. 2007-0442
Parties: Swaisgood, Appellee, v. Puder et al.; Verizon North, Inc., Appellant.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 118
Pages: 445–445

Head Matter:
Swaisgood, Appellee, v. Puder et al.; Verizon North, Inc., Appellant.
[Cite as Swaisgood v. Puder, 118 Ohio St.3d 445, 2008-Ohio-3177.]
(No. 2007-0442
Submitted May 21, 2008
Decided July 2, 2008.)
Murray & Murray Co., L.P.A., Charles M. Murray, and William H. Bartle, for appellee.
Thompson Hiñe, L.L.P., Andrew H. Cox, and William J. Hubbard, for appellant.

Opinion:
{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Turner v. Ohio Bell Tel. Co., 118 Ohio St.3d 215, 2008-Ohio-2010, 887 N.E.2d 1158.
Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
O'Donnell, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Turner v. Ohio Bell Tel. Co.