Case Name: Cincinnati Bar Association v. Wolosin
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1995-03-22
Citations: 71 Ohio St. 3d 611
Docket Number: No. 94-1375
Parties: Cincinnati Bar Association v. Wolosin.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 71
Pages: 611–614

Head Matter:
Cincinnati Bar Association v. Wolosin.
[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Wolosin (1995), 71 Ohio St.3d 611.]
(No. 94-1375
Submitted January 10, 1995
Decided March 22, 1995.)
Rebecca K. Kaye and Thomas R. Smith, for relator.
Kondritzer, Gold, Frank & Crowley Co., L.P.A., and Mark R. Naegel, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We have thoroughly reviewed the record and agree with the board's findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Respondent is therefore suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for two years, but the suspension is stayed, and respondent is placed on probation under the conditions set by the board. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.