Case Name: Robin WEAVER, Petitioner, v. LANCASTER NEWSPAPERS INC., Intelligencer Journal and Oscar Lee Brownstein, Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2006-04-04
Citations: 895 A.2d 527
Docket Number: 
Parties: Robin WEAVER, Petitioner, v. LANCASTER NEWSPAPERS INC., Intelligencer Journal and Oscar Lee Brownstein, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 895
Pages: 527–528

Head Matter:
Robin WEAVER, Petitioner, v. LANCASTER NEWSPAPERS INC., Intelligencer Journal and Oscar Lee Brownstein, Respondents.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
April 4, 2006.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 4th day of April, 2006, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, LIMITED to the question of whether, under this Court's decision in O'Donnell v. Philadelphia Record Co., 356 Pa. 307, 51 A.2d 775 (1947), Respondent Brownsteiris alleged actions in granting permission, in the post-complaint timeframe, to a third party to republish the disputed letter to the editor, con stitutes sufficient circumstantial evidence of actual malice for the cause of action against Respondent Brownstein to survive his motion for summary judgment.