Case Name: THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. LAWRENCE RUGLIO, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1923-09-28
Citations: 99 N.J.L. 307
Docket Number: 
Parties: THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. LAWRENCE RUGLIO, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 99
Pages: 307–308

Head Matter:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. LAWRENCE RUGLIO, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Argued June 21, 1923
Decided September 28, 1923.
On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 98 N. J. L. 13.
Por the plaintiff in error, Wilbur A. Heisley.
Por the defendant in error, John 0. Bigelow.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Gummere in the Supreme Court.
: For affirmance — The Chancellor, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Van Bus-kirk, JJ. 8.
For reversal — Parker, Kalisch, JJ. 2.