Case Name: RICKETTS, Plaintiff-Appellant v. FICK et, Defendants-Appellees
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1943-06-15
Citations: 43 Ohio Law Abs. 136
Docket Number: No. 3647
Parties: RICKETTS, Plaintiff-Appellant v. FICK et, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: BARNES, P. J., HORNBECK and GEIGER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 43
Pages: 136–137

Head Matter:
RICKETTS, Plaintiff-Appellant v. FICK et, Defendants-Appellees.
Ohio Appeals, Second District, Franklin County.
No. 3647.
Decided June 15, 1943.
Erastus G. Lloyd, Columbus, for plaintiff-appellant.
Frank J. Cipriano, Columbus, for defendants-appellees.

Opinion:
OPINION
BY THE COURT:
The above-entitled cause is now being determined on the defendants-appellees' application for rehearing.
The application states no specific grounds for rehearing except the request for reconsideration.
Neither does any memoranda accompany the application. It is possible that counsel considers this procedure as essential to application for certification to the Supreme Court. If such be the view, it is in error. The only purpose for the application for rehearing is to call the Court's attention to some matters of substance that may have been overlooked or some obvious errors on factual questions.
The application for rehearing will be overruled.
BARNES, P. J., HORNBECK and GEIGER, JJ., concur.