Case Name: Frone Rawls v. The State
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1912-06-26
Citations: 67 Tex. Crim. 556
Docket Number: No. 1960
Parties: Frone Rawls v. The State.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Criminal Reports
Volume: 67
Pages: 556–557

Head Matter:
Frone Rawls v. The State.
No. 1960.
Decided June 26, 1912.
Rehearing granted October 16, 1912.
Decoying Minor—Statement of Facts.
Where the judgment was affirmed because of the absence of a statement of facts, and it was shown on motion for rehearing that the failure of the trial judge to approve the statement of facts arose from no want of diligence on the part of appellant, the judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded. Sargent v. State, 61 Texas Grim. Rep., 34, and other cases.
Appeal from the County Court of Jasper. Tried below before the Hon. W. B. Blackshear.
Appeal from unlawfully decoying a minor from the custody of his guardian; penalty, a fine of $25.
The opinion states the ease.
Garland Smith, for appellant.
G. E. Lane, Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

Opinion:
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
—Appellant was convicted under an information charging her with enticing and decoying a minor from the custody of I. N. Graham, the legally appointed guardian of the minor, whose name was Silas Castle.
What purports to be a statement of facts in the record is signed by the attorneys, but was not approved by the judge. It, therefore, can not be considered. In the absence of a statement of facts we are unable to revise the questions presented, to wit: the want of sufficient evidence and errors of omission and commission in connection with the charge of the court.
With the record in this condition the judgment must be affirmed, and it is accordingly .so ordered.
Affirmed.