Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Arthur A. SMITH, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2008-10-14
Citations: 266 S.W.3d 333
Docket Number: No. ED 90639
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Arthur A. SMITH, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before BOOKER T. SHAW, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and MARY K HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 266
Pages: 333–334

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Arthur A. SMITH, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 90639.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Oct. 14, 2008.
Nancy A. McKerrow, Ellen H. Flottman, co-counsel, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, Cory Lee Atkins, co-counsel, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before BOOKER T. SHAW, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and MARY K HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant Arthur Smith appeals the trial court's conviction on two counts of second-degree domestic assault (§ 565.073). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude that the trial court did not err. No prece-dential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).