Case Name: Clare Fowler, Respondent, v. Trataros Construction, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, and RWKS Transit, Inc., et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents-Appellants. New York Acoustics, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant-Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2004-04-05
Citations: 6 A.D.3d 385
Docket Number: 
Parties: Clare Fowler, Respondent, v Trataros Construction, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, and RWKS Transit, Inc., et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents-Appellants. New York Acoustics, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant-Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 6
Pages: 385–386

Head Matter:
Clare Fowler, Respondent, v Trataros Construction, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, and RWKS Transit, Inc., et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents-Appellants. New York Acoustics, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant-Respondent.
[773 NYS2d 896]

Opinion:
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the third- party and second third-party defendant, New York Acoustics, Inc., appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Weiss, J.), dated October 3, 2002, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the third party and second third-party complaints, and the defendants RWKS Transit, Inc., Impulse Enterprises of New York, Inc., and F&V/V&R/M&W Joint Venture, cross-appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of the same order as denied their cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
There are issues of fact requiring the denial of summary judgment. Prudenti, P.J., Smith, Goldstein and Crane, JJ., concur.