Case Name: Daniel Lee LAGEMANN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1981-07-10
Citations: 400 So. 2d 1041
Docket Number: No. 80-2251
Parties: Daniel Lee LAGEMANN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: HOBSON, Acting C. J., and DANAHY and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 400
Pages: 1041–1041

Head Matter:
Daniel Lee LAGEMANN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 80-2251.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
July 10, 1981.
Lawrence D. Martin of Vega, Brown, Nichols, Stanley & Martin, P.A., Naples, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Michael A. Palecki, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant raises two issues in his appeal from the judgment and sentence entered by the court below. The only issue which warrants action by this court is that involving the sentence of the court. Though the court adjudicated appellant guilty of seven counts, it imposed a general sentence of three years together with a $5,000 fine without specifying a sentence for each offense for which the appellant was found guilty. A general sentence in such a situation violates section 775.021, Florida Statutes (1979). Therefore, the judgments of guilt as to each charge are affirmed, but the case is remanded for the entry of a separate judgment and sentence on each conviction. See Fundak v. State, 362 So.2d 295 (Fla.2d DCA 1978).
HOBSON, Acting C. J., and DANAHY and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.