Case Name: Melvin THIESSEN, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, United Automobile Workers of America, Local 882, International Union, United Automobile Workers of America, Defendants-Appellees, International Union, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-11-03
Citations: 148 F. App'x 919
Docket Number: No. 04-15208
Parties: Melvin THIESSEN, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, United Automobile Workers of America, Local 882, International Union, United Automobile Workers of America, Defendants-Appellees, International Union, Defendant.
Judges: Before: TJOFLAT and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges, and LAWSON, District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 148
Pages: 919–919

Head Matter:
Melvin THIESSEN, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, United Automobile Workers of America, Local 882, International Union, United Automobile Workers of America, Defendants-Appellees, International Union, Defendant.
No. 04-15208.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Nov. 3, 2005.
Lorna Sills Katica, Katica & Associates, LLC, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Sarah T. Holloway, Lisa Combs Jern, Sutherland, Asbill & Brennan, Atlanta, GA, Lesley A. Troope, Nakamura, Quinn & Walls, Decatur, GA, for DefendantsAppellees.
Before: TJOFLAT and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges, and LAWSON, District Judge.
Honorable Hugh Lawson, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Georgia, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
AFFIRMED. See 11th Cir. R. 36-1.
. 11th Cir. R. 36-1 provides:
When the court determines that any of the following circumstances exist:
(a) judgment of the district court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous;
(b) the evidence in support of a jury verdict is sufficient;
(c) the order of an administrative agency is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole;
(d) summary judgment, directed verdict, or judgment on the pleadings is supported by the record;
(e) judgment has been entered without a reversible error of law; and an opinion would have no precedential value, the judgment or order may be affirmed or enforced without opinion.