Case Name: STERN et v. BEVERLY CO.
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1926-07-16
Citations: 4 Ohio Law Abs. 620
Docket Number: No. 19983
Parties: STERN et v. BEVERLY CO.
Judges: 
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 4
Pages: 620–620

Head Matter:
STERN et v. BEVERLY CO.
No. 19983.
Supreme Court
Dock. July 16, 1926;
4 Abs. 493.
Attorneys — C. K. Friedman and P. H. Taylor for Stem; Kirkbride, McCabe & Boesel for Company; all of Toledo.

Opinion:
This action was brought originally in the Lucas Common Pleas by The Beverley Company against Adolph Stern and Isadore Ginsberg upon an account.
It appears that the subject of the account was a car load of cots upon which Stern and Ginsberg had received many complaints. The sale hal been made by sample.
The judgment of the Common Pleas in favor of the Company was affirmed by the Court of Appeals.
Plaintiffs in error contend:
1. That the court erred in excluding certain exhibits consisting of defective cots which had been returned.
2. That it is proper to sue for breach of a warranty of fitness rather than to rely upon a suit for failure of the merchandise to conform to the sample.