Case Name: Monty E. WRIGHT, a/k/a Monty E. Hamlor, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William W. MUSE, Chairman; Virginia Parole Board, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-03-05
Citations: 558 F. App'x 330
Docket Number: No. 13-7825
Parties: Monty E. WRIGHT, a/k/a Monty E. Hamlor, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William W. MUSE, Chairman; Virginia Parole Board, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 558
Pages: 330–331

Head Matter:
Monty E. WRIGHT, a/k/a Monty E. Hamlor, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William W. MUSE, Chairman; Virginia Parole Board, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 13-7825.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 27, 2014.
Decided: March 5, 2014.
Monty Wright, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
UNPUBLISHED
PER CURIAM:
Monty E. Wright appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint without prejudice as frivolous, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
We conclude that the order is final and ap-pealable as no amendment to the complaint could cure the defects identified by the district court. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir.1993).