Case Name: Mark J. FELDMAN and Mark J. Feldman, P.A., Appellants, v. Donald L. FARBER, P.A., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1983-10-11
Citations: 438 So. 2d 202
Docket Number: No. 83-1402
Parties: Mark J. FELDMAN and Mark J. Feldman, P.A., Appellants, v. Donald L. FARBER, P.A., Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HENDRY and FERGUSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 438
Pages: 202–202

Head Matter:
Mark J. FELDMAN and Mark J. Feldman, P.A., Appellants, v. Donald L. FARBER, P.A., Appellee.
No. 83-1402.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 11, 1983.
Mark J. Feldman, Miami, for appellants.
Podhurst, Orseck, Parks, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow & Olin, and Joel D. Eaton, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HENDRY and FERGUSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Based on appellee's confession of error, that an injunction is not a proper remedy in an action at law where monetary damages will adequately compensate, Supreme Service Station Corp. v. Telecredit Service Center, Inc., 424 So.2d 844 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Digaeteno v. Perotti, 374 So.2d 1015 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), we reverse and remand.
Reversed and remanded.