Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert J. KUHN, Jose C. Davila, and Doyle E. Huckabee, Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1981-02-23
Citations: 638 F.2d 17
Docket Number: No. 80-1207
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert J. KUHN, Jose C. Davila, and Doyle E. Huckabee, Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: Before GEE, RUBIN and RANDALL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 638
Pages: 17–17

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert J. KUHN, Jose C. Davila, and Doyle E. Huckabee, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 80-1207
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Unit A
Feb. 23, 1981.
James Daniel (Jay) Doyle, III, Austin, Tex., for defendant-appellant Davilla.
Albert A. Pena, III, Corpus Christi, Tex., for defendant-appellant Huckabee.
Richard Witte Alexander, Austin, Tex., for defendant-appellant Kuhn.
LeRoy Morgan Jahn, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion Nov. 5, 1980, 5 Cir., 629 F.2d 1087)
Before GEE, RUBIN and RANDALL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
In our original opinion, we decided the merits of this attempted Abney -type appeal on the assumption that we had jurisdiction to do so, expressly reserving that question. Since then it has been determined that we lack such jurisdiction. United States v. Becton, 632 F.2d 1294 (5th Cir. 1980). What we earlier wrote on the merits is therefore of no effect. We withdraw it. The appeal is
DISMISSED.
. Abney v. United States, 431 U.S. 651, 97 S.Ct. 2034, 52 L.Ed.2d 651 (1977).