Case Name: Jules PAUL, Appellant, v. Jennifer CHARLES, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-05-24
Citations: 816 So. 2d 837
Docket Number: No. 5D01-2249
Parties: Jules PAUL, Appellant, v. Jennifer CHARLES, Appellee.
Judges: THOMPSON, C.J., SAWAYA and PLEUS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 816
Pages: 837–837

Head Matter:
Jules PAUL, Appellant, v. Jennifer CHARLES, Appellee.
No. 5D01-2249.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
May 24, 2002.
Sharon Lee Stedman of Cabaniss, Smith, Toole & Wiggins, P.L., Maitland, for Appellant.
No Appearance for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979) (holding that "[i]n appellate proceedings the decision of the trial court has the presumption of correctness and the burden is on the appellant to demonstrate error."); Prymus v. Prymus, 753 So.2d 742 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (stating that without a transcript or proper substitute of the final hearing below "the presumption of correctness which attaches to this final judgment remains intact and we can find no abuse of discretion in this regard.").
THOMPSON, C.J., SAWAYA and PLEUS, JJ., concur.