Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Matthew B. RANDOLPH, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-05-22
Citations: 367 S.W.3d 157
Docket Number: No. ED 96703
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Matthew B. RANDOLPH, Appellant.
Judges: Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J. and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 367
Pages: 157–157

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Matthew B. RANDOLPH, Appellant.
No. ED 96703.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
May 22, 2012.
Gary E. Brotherton, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Karen L. Kramer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J. and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Matthew Randolph appeals the judgment entered upon a jury's verdict convicting him of one count of statutory rape of a child under fourteen years of age and two counts of statutory sodomy with a child under fourteen years of age. We find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in precluding Dr. Ann Duncan from providing expert testimony about interviewing techniques used on H.A. or on the credibility of late disclosures, nor did the court err in allowing Mrs. Randolph's testimony about photos she found on Randolph's computer. We affirm.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).