Case Name: Joan P. GROVE, Petitioner v. PORT AUTHORITY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, Respondent Joan P. Grove, Petitioner v. Port Authority of Allegheny County, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2018-08-31
Citations: 193 A.3d 343
Docket Number: No. 127 WAL 2018; No. 128 WAL 2018
Parties: Joan P. GROVE, Petitioner
v.
PORT AUTHORITY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, Respondent
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 193
Pages: 343–343

Head Matter:
Joan P. GROVE, Petitioner
v.
PORT AUTHORITY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, Respondent
Joan P. Grove, Petitioner
v.
Port Authority of Allegheny County, Respondent
No. 127 WAL 2018
No. 128 WAL 2018
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
August 31, 2018
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 31st day of August, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Did the Commonwealth Court misapprehend basic fundamentals of tort law by holding that the failure to give a per se negligence charge where the jury still found [Petitioner] to be negligent even without the benefit of such charge was somehow relevant to the apportionment of factual cause?