Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Matthew Lane DRENNEN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-06-14
Citations: 100 F. App'x 891
Docket Number: No. 04-6006
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Matthew Lane DRENNEN, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 100
Pages: 891–891

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Matthew Lane DRENNEN, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 04-6006.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 26, 2004.
Decided: June 14, 2004.
Matthew Lane Drennen, Appellant pro se.
Paul3 Thomas Camilletti, Office of the United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Matthew Lane Drennen appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Drennen, No. CR-95-27-5 (N.D.W.Va. Oct. 9, 2003); see also United States v. Capers, 61 F.3d 1100, 1109 (4th Cir.1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED