Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Harry Gilberto PIOQUINTO-NARCIZO, also known as Giovanni Perez-Hernandez, also known as Harry Gilberto Perez, Defendant-Appellant; United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Harry Pioquinto-Narcizco, also known as Giovani Perez-Hernandez, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-04-20
Citations: 376 F. App'x 372
Docket Number: Nos. 09-10749, 09-10750
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Harry Gilberto PIOQUINTO-NARCIZO, also known as Giovanni Perez-Hernandez, also known as Harry Gilberto Perez, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Harry Pioquinto-Narcizco, also known as Giovani Perez-Hernandez, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before SMITH, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 376
Pages: 372–372

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Harry Gilberto PIOQUINTO-NARCIZO, also known as Giovanni Perez-Hernandez, also known as Harry Gilberto Perez, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Harry Pioquinto-Narcizco, also known as Giovani Perez-Hernandez, Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 09-10749, 09-10750
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 20, 2010.
Amanda R. Burch, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Lubbock, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Kevin Joel Page, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Dallas, TX, David E. Sloan, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Lubbock, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Harry Gilberto Pioquinto-Narcizco, Oakdale, LA, pro se.
Before SMITH, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Harry Gilberto Pioquinto-Narcizco has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Pio-quinto-Narcizco has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel's brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEALS ARE DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.