Case Name: E. E. MILLS, Individually and E. E. Mills, doing business as Mills Auction Market, Petitioner, v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY, a corporation, Abdallah Katiba, and C. E. Mills, Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1965-10-27
Citations: 179 So. 2d 346
Docket Number: No. 34238
Parties: E. E. MILLS, Individually and E. E. Mills, doing business as Mills Auction Market, Petitioner, v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY, a corporation, Abdallah Katiba, and C. E. Mills, Respondents.
Judges: THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 179
Pages: 346–347

Head Matter:
E. E. MILLS, Individually and E. E. Mills, doing business as Mills Auction Market, Petitioner, v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY, a corporation, Abdallah Katiba, and C. E. Mills, Respondents.
No. 34238.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Oct. 27, 1965.
Savage & Krim, and George John Miller, Ocala, for petitioner.
Lazonby, Dell, Graham, Willcox & Barber, Gainesville, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Upon the filing of the petition for certi-orari in this case there was an apparent conflict between the decision of the District Court of Appeal and decisions of this court and other District Courts of Appeal so the matter was set for argument on jurisdiction and merits.
After hearing the arguments for petitioner and respondents and making an intensive study of the record and briefs, we now conclude that no such conflict exists as to vest jurisdiction in this court under Sec. 4, Art. V of the Constitution, F.S.A., so the petition for certiorari is—
Denied.
THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, O'CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.