Case Name: CARWILE v. FRAZIER et al.
Court: Texas Courts of Civil Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1919-03-08
Citations: 209 S.W. 781
Docket Number: No. 8076
Parties: CARWILE v. FRAZIER et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 209
Pages: 781–781

Head Matter:
CARWILE v. FRAZIER et al.
(No. 8076.)
(Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Dallas.
March 8, 1919.)
1. Appeal and Error <&wkey;548(5) — Assignments oe Error — Exclusion of Evidence —Bills of Exception.
Assignments of error, complaining of exclusion of evidence to require consideration by the Court of Civil Appeals, must be supported by bills of exception to the action of the trial court.
2. Appeal and Error &wkey;655(2) — Bills of \Exception Filed Late — Striking.
"Bills of exception, filed long after the time granted for filing, -cannot be considered by the Court of Civil Appeals, and will be stricken out.
Appeal from District Court, Neill County; Horton B. Porter, Judge.
Suit by W. L. Carwile against A. M. Frazier and others. From judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.
Affirmed.
Will M. Martin, of Hillsboro, for appellant.
W. C. Wear and J. J. Averitte, both of Hillsboro, for appellees.

Opinion:
RAINEY, C. J.
Appellant brought this suit against appellees to' foreclose a lien on a certain town lot, and to recover a personal judgment against A. M. Frazier on a tax levy for paving a street in Hillsboro. A trial resulted in a judgment in favor of appellees, from which this appeal is taken.
The appellant has presented only three assignments of error, all of which complaint of the court for sustaining the objection to the introduction of evidence offered by appellant. These assignments, to require consideration by this court, must be supported by bills of exception to the court's action. The records show that bills wfere filed below, but the appellees object to consideration of said bills, because same were not filed within the limit of extension of the time granted by the trial court for the filing of same. Upon examination we find that the record shows that said bills of exception were filed long after the time granted for filing same, and they cannot be considered, and same will be stricken out, and the assignments not considered, which leaves no assignments for this court to act upon; therefore the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
©soFor other cases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes