Case Name: The State, ex rel. Danford, Appellant, v. Karl, Mayor, et al., Appellees
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1967-02-08
Citations: 9 Ohio St. 2d 79
Docket Number: No. 40315
Parties: The State, ex rel. Danford, Appellant, v. Karl, Mayor, et al., Appellees.
Judges: Taft, O. J., Zimmeeman, Matthias, O’Neill, Schneidee and Beown, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Second Series
Volume: 9
Pages: 79–80

Head Matter:
The State, ex rel. Danford, Appellant, v. Karl, Mayor, et al., Appellees.
(No. 40315
Decided February 8, 1967.)
Mr. Jas. Slater Gibson, for appellant.
Mr. Robert Dorrell and Messrs. Reams, Bretherton Neipp, for appellees.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Relator has a plain and adequate remedy by way of mandatory injunction which he could have sought in the Court of Common Pleas.
A writ of mandamus must not be issued where there is a plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. State, ex rel. Central Service Station, Inc., v. Masheter, Dir. of Ewys., 7 Ohio St. 2d 1; State, ex rel. Sibarco Corp., v. City of Berea, 7 Ohio St. 2d 85.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Taft, O. J., Zimmeeman, Matthias, O'Neill, Schneidee and Beown, JJ., concur.