Case Name: STATE of Arizona ex rel. Robert K. CORBIN, County Attorney for Maricopa County, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT of the State of Arizona IN AND FOR the COUNTY OF MARICOPA; Morris Rozar, Judge of the Superior Court of the State of Arizona in and for the County of Maricopa, Division No. 18; William Henry HULL, real party in Interest, Respondents
Court: Arizona Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Arizona
Decision Date: 1968-06-11
Citations: 103 Ariz. 339
Docket Number: No. 9325
Parties: STATE of Arizona ex rel. Robert K. CORBIN, County Attorney for Maricopa County, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT of the State of Arizona IN AND FOR the COUNTY OF MARICOPA; Morris Rozar, Judge of the Superior Court of the State of Arizona in and for the County of Maricopa, Division No. 18; William Henry HULL, real party in Interest, Respondents.
Judges: McFARLAND, C. J., UDALL, V. C. J., and STRUCKMEYER, BERNSTEIN and LOCKWOOD, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Arizona Reports
Volume: 103
Pages: 339–339

Head Matter:
442 P.2d 83
STATE of Arizona ex rel. Robert K. CORBIN, County Attorney for Maricopa County, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT of the State of Arizona IN AND FOR the COUNTY OF MARICOPA; Morris Rozar, Judge of the Superior Court of the State of Arizona in and for the County of Maricopa, Division No. 18; William Henry HULL, real party in Interest, Respondents.
No. 9325.
Supreme Court of Arizona. In Banc.
June 11, 1968.
Robert K. Corbin, County Atty. for Maricopa County, and Larry L. Debus, Deputy County Atty., Phoenix, for petitioner.
Stewart & Pickrell, Phoenix, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The application for the writ of prohibition is granted and the writ is made permanent. Rule 142, Rules of Criminal Procedure, 17 A.R.S.; State v. Intogna, 101 Ariz. 275, 419 P.2d 59; State v. Woolery, 93 Ariz. 76, 378 P.2d 751.
McFARLAND, C. J., UDALL, V. C. J., and STRUCKMEYER, BERNSTEIN and LOCKWOOD, JJ., concur.