Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Jeremy GRANT, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2015-11-10
Citations: 474 S.W.3d 604
Docket Number: No. ED 102506
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Jeremy GRANT, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before Lisa S. Van Amburg, C.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 474
Pages: 604–605

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Jeremy GRANT, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 102506
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
Filed: November 10, 2015
Daniel. N. McPherson, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for Plaintiff/Respondent.
Andrew E. Zleit, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for Defendant/Appellant.
Before Lisa S. Van Amburg, C.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Jeremy Grant (Appellant) appeals from the trial court's judgment finding him guilty of one court of tampering with a motor vehicle. We have reviewed the briefs' of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not err in denyihg Appellant's motion to suppress evidence. State v. Grayson, 336 S.W.3d 138, 142 (Mo. banc 2011). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties -for their use only, We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b). .