Case Name: Gino BISCARO, et al., Petitioners, v. EUCLID 1610, INC., etc., et al., Respondents.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2018-09-20
Citations: 255 So. 3d 485
Docket Number: No. 3D18-0388
Parties: Gino BISCARO, et al., Petitioners,
v.
EUCLID 1610, INC., etc., et al., Respondents.
Judges: Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and SUAREZ, and LINDSEY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 255
Pages: 485–485

Head Matter:
Gino BISCARO, et al., Petitioners,
v.
EUCLID 1610, INC., etc., et al., Respondents.
No. 3D18-0388
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Opinion filed September 20, 2018
Law Offices of Marina Barturen, and Marina Barturen, for appellants/petitioners.
Bello & Martinez, PLLC, and Joel A. Bello and Ian Illych Martinez, Coral Gables, for appellees/respondents.
Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and SUAREZ, and LINDSEY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We treat this appeal as a petition for certiorari pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.100, and deny the petition. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 1979) ; Blue Star Palms, LLC v. LED Trust, LLC, 128 So.3d 36 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012).