Case Name: SHAPTER v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; DE CRANO v. SAME; AMES v. SAME; KING v. SAME; SWIFT v. SAME
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1902-05-27
Citations: 115 F. 1021
Docket Number: Nos. 806-810
Parties: SHAPTER v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO. DE CRANO v. SAME. AMES v. SAME. KING v. SAME. SWIFT v. SAME.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter
Volume: 115
Pages: 1021–1021

Head Matter:
SHAPTER v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO. DE CRANO v. SAME. AMES v. SAME. KING v. SAME. SWIFT v. SAME.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 27, 1902.)
Nos. 806-810.
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of California.
Page, McOutcheon, Harding & Knight, for plaintiffs in error.
Franklin K. Lane and Geo. W. Lane, for defendants in error.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Upon authority of Mather v. City and County of San Francisco (No. 739) 115 Fed. 37, decided by the circuit court of appeals, Ninth circuit, March 3, 1902, ordered, judgments of circuit court reversed, with costs, and cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this court in the case of Mather v. City and County of San Francisco, supra.