Case Name: Dan H. Elkind, Respondent, v. City of New Rochelle, Respondent, and Esther R. Freedman et al., Proposed Intervenors-Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1957-01-28
Citations: 3 A.D.2d 676
Docket Number: 
Parties: Dan H. Elkind, Respondent, v. City of New Rochelle, Respondent, and Esther R. Freedman et al., Proposed Intervenors-Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 3
Pages: 676–677

Head Matter:
Dan H. Elkind, Respondent, v. City of New Rochelle, Respondent, and Esther R. Freedman et al., Proposed Intervenors-Appellants.

Opinion:
In an action to declare invalid a part of an article of the Charter of the City of New Rochelle, four residents of said city appeal from an order which denied their motion for permission to intervene as parties defendant but granted them permission to participate solely as amici curia. Order affirmed, without costs. ao opinion. Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.