Case Name: HENRY GROTE v. MRS. CHARLES STANLEY ROGERS; HELEN RIDDLE v. SAME; J. FRANK RIDDLE v. SAME
Court: Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jurisdiction: Maryland
Decision Date: 1930-03-13
Citations: 158 Md. 695
Docket Number: Nos. 29, 30, 31
Parties: HENRY GROTE v. MRS. CHARLES STANLEY ROGERS. HELEN RIDDLE v. SAME. J. FRANK RIDDLE v. SAME.
Judges: 
Reporter: Maryland Reports
Volume: 158
Pages: 695–696

Head Matter:
HENRY GROTE v. MRS. CHARLES STANLEY ROGERS. HELEN RIDDLE v. SAME. J. FRANK RIDDLE v. SAME.
[Nos. 29, 30, 31,
January Term, 1930.]
Decided March 13th, 1930.
The causes were argued, together with'that next preceding, before Bond, C. J., TJrner, Adkins, Oekutt, Digges, and Parke, JJ.
Palmer R. Nickerson and 0forge Ross Veazey, with whom was Edwvn W. Wells on the brief, for the appellants.
Fendall Marbv/i'y, for the appellee.

Opinion:
A per curiam opinion was delivered as follows:
For the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the case of Sophie Grote v. Mrs. Charles Stanley Rogers, being No. 28 on the docket of the present term, the similar orders in the cases of Henry Grote, Helen Riddle and J. Frank Riddle, against the same appellee, being Eos. 29, 30 and 31, on the docket of the present term, and involving the same question, are hereby affirmed with costs.