Case Name: John B. Winston, Respondent, v. Mezzanine Investments, L.P., et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1994-04-28
Citations: 203 A.D.2d 206
Docket Number: 
Parties: John B. Winston, Respondent, v Mezzanine Investments, L.P., et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 203
Pages: 206–206

Head Matter:
John B. Winston, Respondent, v Mezzanine Investments, L.P., et al., Appellants.
[612 NYS2d 854]

Opinion:
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Elliott Wilk, J.), entered August 3, 1993, which denied defendants' motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
We agree with the IAS Court that the word "cumulative", as used in the definition of the term "Priority Return" in the limited partnership agreement, is ambiguous and its intended meaning cannot be construed as a matter of law. Concur— Rosenberger, J. P., Ross, Rubin, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.