Case Name: Jason W. LANE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Patricia WATSON, Commonwealth Attorney; Steven B. Novey, Lawyer; Robert G. O'Hara, Jr., Judge, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-02-07
Citations: 120 F. App'x 984
Docket Number: No. 04-7881
Parties: Jason W. LANE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Patricia WATSON, Commonwealth Attorney; Steven B. Novey, Lawyer; Robert G. O’Hara, Jr., Judge, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before LUTTIG and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 120
Pages: 984–984

Head Matter:
Jason W. LANE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Patricia WATSON, Commonwealth Attorney; Steven B. Novey, Lawyer; Robert G. O’Hara, Jr., Judge, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 04-7881.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 27, 2005.
Decided: Feb. 7, 2005.
Jason W. Lane, Appellant pro se.
Before LUTTIG and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Jason W. Lane appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Lane v. Watson, No. CA-04-1320 (E.D.Va. Nov. 15, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED