Case Name: Bob LOKEY et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. H. L. RICHARDSON, etc., et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1976-09-09
Citations: 540 F.2d 1022
Docket Number: No. 74-1256
Parties: Bob LOKEY et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. H. L. RICHARDSON, etc., et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 540
Pages: 1022–1022

Head Matter:
Bob LOKEY et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. H. L. RICHARDSON, etc., et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 74-1256.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Sept. 9, 1976.
Bob Lokey in pro per.
Evelle J. Younger, Atty. Gen. of Cal., San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellees.
Before BROWNING, ELY and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
Because the legal and factual considerations relevant to the decision of this case' in light of Montanye v. Haymes, - U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 2543, 49 L.Ed.2d-(1976), and Meachum v. Fano, -U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 2532, 49 L.Ed.2d-(1976), were not addressed by the parties or the district court, the summary judgment, reversed by the Court of Appeals, 9 Cir., 527 F.2d 949, with certiorari granted by the Supreme Court, - U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 3186, 49 L.Ed.2d -, is vacated and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent with those decisions.