Case Name: NEW SOUTH INVESTMENTS, INC., Appellant, v. Albert I. HAIMES and Harold B. Haimowitz, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1983-11-23
Citations: 440 So. 2d 693
Docket Number: No. AS-150
Parties: NEW SOUTH INVESTMENTS, INC., Appellant, v. Albert I. HAIMES and Harold B. Haimowitz, Appellees.
Judges: MILLS, THOMPSON and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 440
Pages: 693–693

Head Matter:
NEW SOUTH INVESTMENTS, INC., Appellant, v. Albert I. HAIMES and Harold B. Haimowitz, Appellees.
No. AS-150.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nov. 23, 1983.
John F. Callender of Turner, Ford & Cal-lender, Jacksonville, for appellant.
Ellis E. Neder, Jacksonville, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
New South Investments, Inc. appeals an order dismissing, with prejudice, its second amended complaint for a real estate broker's commission. We reverse.
The second amended complaint for a real estate broker's commission sufficiently alleges a cause of action as required by Rule 1.110(b), Fla.R.Civ.P. Accordingly, the order of dismissal is reversed and the cause is remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
MILLS, THOMPSON and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.