Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Orville B. HOLLIDAY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-08-17
Citations: 9 S.W.3d 619
Docket Number: No. 74192
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Orville B. HOLLIDAY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., C.J., RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 9
Pages: 619–620

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Orville B. HOLLIDAY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 74192.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Northern Division.
Aug. 17, 1999.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 5, 1999.
Kent Denzel, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for defendant-appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Anne E. Hawley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff-respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., C.J., RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of second degree assault in violation of Section 565.060 RSMo. (1994). The judgment also found him to be a prior and persistent offender under Section 558.016 RSMo. (1994). He was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of three years.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).