Case Name: J. L. JOSEPH et al., Petitioners, v. Jesse JAMES, State Treasurer, et al., Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Texas
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1945-01-31
Citations: 185 S.W.2d 974
Docket Number: No. A-151
Parties: J. L. JOSEPH et al., Petitioners, v. Jesse JAMES, State Treasurer, et al., Respondents.
Judges: SHARP, J., dissenting.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 185
Pages: 974–975

Head Matter:
J. L. JOSEPH et al., Petitioners, v. Jesse JAMES, State Treasurer, et al., Respondents.
No. A-151.
Supreme Court of Texas.
Jan. 31, 1945.
Rehearing Denied March 28, 1945.
Kuykendall, Bauknight, Mann & Stevenson and F. L. Kuykendall, all of Austin, for petitioners.
Grover Sellers, Atty. Gen., Gerald C. Mann, former Atty. Gen., of Dallas, and Gaynor Kendall, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondents.

Opinion:
ALEXANDER, Chief Justice.
J. L. Joseph and others, who are engaged as hairdressers and cosmetologists in the State of Texas, brought this suit against the Honorable Jesse James, State Treasurer, and others to enjoin the transfer of fuiids from the "Board of Cosmetology Fund" to the General Revenue Fund, as provided for in Acts of 1943, 48th Leg., ch. 313, p. 469, Vernon's Ann.Civ.St. arts. 4385a, 6687b § 15. The trial court rendered judgment for plaintiffs, holding that the above-mentioned Act was unconstitutional, and enjoining the transfer of such funds. The Court of Civil Appeals reversed the judgment of the trial court and rendered judgment for the defendants. 179 S.W.2d 411.
In the companion case of Gulf Insurance Company et al. v. Jesse James, State Treas urer, et al., 185 S.W.2d 966, we have held that Section 2 of the Act of 1943, 48th Leg., ch. 313, p. 469, which authorized the transfer of these funds to the General Revenue Fund, was unconstitutional. Since the Act which authorized the transfer of the funds is unconstitutional, the trial court properly enjoined the transfer of said funds.
The judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals is reversed, and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
SHARP, J., dissenting.