Case Name: GREEN v. GREEN et al.
Court: Texas Courts of Civil Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1926-02-10
Citations: 282 S.W. 900
Docket Number: No. 7497
Parties: GREEN v. GREEN et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 282
Pages: 900–903

Head Matter:
GREEN v. GREEN et al.
(No. 7497.)
(Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.
Feb. 10, 1926.
Rehearing Denied March 31, 1926.)
Emmett B. Cocke, Ben H. Kelly, and A. L. Matlock, all of San Antonio, for plaintiff in error.
W. H. Blanton, of San Antonio, Midkiff & Green; of Gonzales, and Taliaferro, Cunningham & Moursund, of San Antonio, for defendants in error.
Writ of error granted May 26, 1926.

Opinion:
On Motion to Dismiss.
COBBS, J.
Defendants in error move to dismiss this cause for want of jurisdiction on the ground that prior to the filing of the petition for writ of error the Legislature had passed chapter 18 of the General Laws of the Regular Session of the Thirty-Ninth Legislature, amending article 2078 of the Revised Civil Statutes of 1911, so as to omit the right to procure revision by means of writ of error, and which act had gone into effect 90 days after March 19, 1925, and was therefore in full force and effect prior to the filing of the petition and bond herein.
This contention cannot be sustained. A similar motion was made in the case of J. L. Chapman v. G. R. Morrison et al., 278 S. W. 236, opinion delivered December 9, 1925. The opinion was delivered by our Chief Justice, Fly. So convincing is that opinion that it was cited 'with approval and specially followed by the Amarillo Court of Civil Appeals in Globe Indemnity Co. v. E. O. Barnes, 280 S. W. 275. The opinion of that court was delivered on the 13th of January, 1926, by Justice Randolph. Justice Randolph refers to opinions of other Courts of Appeals, not seen by us, holding the same view and overruling all such motions. So these holdings preserve intact the right to bring up by writs of error such causes, as though the article had not been amended.
The motion to dismiss the writ of error for want of jurisdiction is therefore overruled.