Case Name: RUTH W. WALTERS et al. v. DOCK COMMISSION
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1926-04-13
Citations: 126 Or. 487
Docket Number: 
Parties: RUTH W. WALTERS et al. v. DOCK COMMISSION.
Judges: Rand, C. J., and Coshow and McBride, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 126
Pages: 487–518

Head Matter:
On motion to dismiss appeal.
Motion denied April 13, 1926,
argued on the merits March 1, affirmed April 24. Motion to recall mandate denied September 25, 1928.
RUTH W. WALTERS et al. v. DOCK COMMISSION.
(266 Pac. 634; 270 Pac. 778.)
For the motion, Mr. Arthur I. Moulton and Mr. William P. Lord.
Contra, Mr. W. P. LaBoche, Mr. J. B. Ofner and Messrs. Lonergan & Wagner.

Opinion:
McBRIDE, C. J.
This is a motion to dismiss an appeal for the alleged reason that the transcript was not filed within the time required by law. The transcript, now on file, indicates that an undertaking on appeal was filed June 17th. No objection being made thereto, the appeal was perfected on June 22d. Appellant then had thirty days to file its transcript, which time would have expired on July 22d. The record further shows that on July 8th an order was made allowing twenty days' additional time within which to file the transcript, which taken in connection with the time already granted would have carried the right to file the transcript to August 11th; that on July 27th an order wms made granting thirty days' additional time in which to file the transcript, and that on August 27th, 1925, an order was duly granted allowing a further thirty days' additional time, which, taken with the time not yet expired, would carry the right of appeal to October 10th. The transcript on appeal was filed September 12, 1925, which was within the time allowed and the various extensions. It is averred that the orders of extension are too indefinite to identify the judgment concerning which such extensions were granted, and, while they are not as definite as might be desired, we think they are sufficient.
The motion to dismiss is denied, and the appellant will have twenty days from the date of the denial of this motion within which to file its brief.
Motion to Dismiss Denied.