Case Name: Bernard DANIELS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-01-03
Citations: 664 So. 2d 366
Docket Number: No. 95-3138
Parties: Bernard DANIELS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and NESBITT, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 664
Pages: 366–366

Head Matter:
Bernard DANIELS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 95-3138.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan. 3, 1996.
Bernard Daniels, in pro. per.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Paulette R. Taylor, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and NESBITT, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The State concedes error in the trial court's denial of the defendant's motion to correct illegal sentence. The trial court imposed a seven year sentence with a minimum mandatory sentence of three years to be served consecutively to a seven year sentence with no minimum mandatory portion. The state concedes that the sentence with the minimum mandatory provision should have been ordered to be served first in accordance with Palmer v. State, 571 So.2d 567 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). See also Pioquinto v. State, 656 So.2d 552 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Ricardo v. State, 608 So.2d 93 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).
Therefore, we reverse and remand with directions to resentenee the defendant so that the mandatory sentence is served first.
Reversed and remanded with directions.