Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gustavo REYES, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-07-26
Citations: 191 F. App'x 620
Docket Number: No. 05-10368
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Gustavo REYES, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: ALARCÓN, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 191
Pages: 620–620

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Gustavo REYES, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 05-10368.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 24, 2006.
Filed July 26, 2006.
Dawrence W. Rice, Jr., Esq., USF— Office of the U.S. Attorney, Fresno, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Carolyn D. Phillips, Esq., Fresno, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: ALARCÓN, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Gustavo Reyes appeals from his jury-trial conviction and 78-month sentence for possession with intent to distribute cocaine base and marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Reyes has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Reyes filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Our independent review of the briefs and the record, pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief.
Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.