Case Name: Samuel Joseph, Appellant, v. Nathan Anthony and Others, Respondents. (Action No. 1.); Nathan Anthony and Others, Respondents, v. Saul Joseph, Defendant. (Action No. 2.)
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1931-10
Citations: 234 A.D. 663
Docket Number: 
Parties: Samuel Joseph, Appellant, v. Nathan Anthony and Others, Respondents. (Action No. 1.); Nathan Anthony and Others, Respondents, v. Saul Joseph, Defendant. (Action No. 2.)
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 234
Pages: 663–663

Head Matter:
Samuel Joseph, Appellant, v. Nathan Anthony and Others, Respondents. (Action No. 1.); Nathan Anthony and Others, Respondents, v. Saul Joseph, Defendant. (Action No. 2.)

Opinion:
— Order affirmed, with ten doEars costs and disbursements. The eonsohdation of actions Nos. ] and 2 would prejudice a substantial right of respondents, to wit, a speedy trial. Present — Finch, P. J., McAvoy, Martin, O'MaEey and Townley, JJ.