Case Name: Raleigh Industries of America, Inc. v. United States; Bert Scheuer, Inc. v. United States; Otto C. Ling & Son, Inc. v. United States; Otto C. Ling & Son, Inc. v. United States; Beacon Cycle & Sporting Goods Co. v. United States
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1968-10-02
Citations: 61 Cust. Ct. 653
Docket Number: No. P68/421; protest 58/4180 (Charleston); No. P68/422; protest 59/20177-S (New York); No. P68/423; protests 60/11731, etc. (New York); No. P68/424; protests 61/175,1, etc. (New York); No. P68/425; protest 61/2562 (Milwaukee)
Parties: Raleigh Industries of America, Inc. v. United States,
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Volume: 61
Pages: 653–653

Head Matter:
Before The Second Division,
October 2, 1968
No. P68/421.
protest 58/4180 (Charleston).
No. P68/422.
protest 59/20177-S (New York).
No. P68/423.
protests 60/11731, etc. (New York).
No. P68/424.
protests 61/175,1, etc. (New York).
No. P68/425.
protest 61/2562 (Milwaukee).
Raleigh Industries of America, Inc. v. United States,
Bert Scheuer, Inc. v. United States,
Otto C. Ling & Son, Inc. v. United States,
Otto C. Ling & Son, Inc. v. United States,
Beacon Cycle & Sporting Goods Co. v. United States,

Opinion:
Rao, C. J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of bicycles, with or without tires having wheels in diameter (measured to the outer circumference of the tire) over 25 inches, weighing less than 36 pounds complete without accessories, and not designed for use with tires having a cross-sectional diameter exceeding 1% inches and that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. Schmidt Pritchard & Co., Mangano Oyeles Co. (47 CCPA 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.