Case Name: Robert L. POHLMAN, Jr. and Elizabeth H. Pohlman et al., Appellant, v. AQUA CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPERS, LTD., an Alabama Limited Liability Company, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2008-09-15
Citations: 992 So. 2d 288
Docket Number: No. 1D08-3454
Parties: Robert L. POHLMAN, Jr. and Elizabeth H. Pohlman et al., Appellant, v. AQUA CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPERS, LTD., an Alabama Limited Liability Company, Appellee.
Judges: BENTON, POLSTON, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 992
Pages: 288–289

Head Matter:
Robert L. POHLMAN, Jr. and Elizabeth H. Pohlman et al., Appellant, v. AQUA CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPERS, LTD., an Alabama Limited Liability Company, Appellee.
No. 1D08-3454.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Sept. 15, 2008.
Michael C. Rayboun and Vicki Gordon Kaufman, of Anchors Smith Grimsley, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Stephen A. Pitre of Clark, Partington, Hart, Larry, Bond <& Stackhouse, Pensacola, and Clifford W. Sanborn, III, Panama City, and Robert D. Segall of Copeland, Franco, Screws & Gill, P.A., Montgomery, Alabama, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellants brought this appeal seeking review of an "Order of Dismissal of Counts I and II (Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act)," entered on June 12, 2008. This order granted appellee's motion to dismiss two of the three counts of the appellants' complaint upon the trial court's determination that the purchase contract upon which they were based did not create an illusory commitment to construct a condominium unit within two years from the date of the contract. Therefore, the trial court concluded that the purchase contract was exempt from the requirements of the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1701, et seq. The order left pending a claim for breach of contract, as well as counterclaims for specific performance and breach of contract, all involving the purchase contract that was at issue in the dismissed claims. Because the claims addressed by the order on appeal overlap and are interrelated with the pending claims, this appeal is premature. Massachusetts Life Ins. Co. v. Crapo, 918 So.2d 393 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).
DISMISSED.
BENTON, POLSTON, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.