Case Name: Disciplinary Counsel v. Lehmkuhl
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2014-05-23
Citations: 139 Ohio St. 3d 1235
Docket Number: No. 2012-1719
Parties: Disciplinary Counsel v. Lehmkuhl.
Judges: O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 139
Pages: 1235–1235

Head Matter:
Disciplinary Counsel v. Lehmkuhl.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Lehmkuhl, 139 Ohio St.3d 1235, 2014-Ohio-2172.]
(No. 2012-1719
Submitted May 20, 2014
Decided May 23, 2014.)

Opinion:
{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Phillip Douglas Lehmkuhl, Attorney Registration No. 0021246, last known business address in Mt. Vernon, Ohio.
{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of March 27, 2014, wherein the court suspended respondent from the practice of law until respondent paid all costs and accrued interest in full, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A).
{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.
{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.
O'Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O'Neill, JJ., concur.