Case Name: Audrey MUDD, Appellant, v. Joseph MUDD, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-06-24
Citations: 112 S.W.3d 439
Docket Number: No. ED 81344
Parties: Audrey MUDD, Appellant, v. Joseph MUDD, Respondent.
Judges: Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 112
Pages: 439–439

Head Matter:
Audrey MUDD, Appellant, v. Joseph MUDD, Respondent.
No. ED 81344.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
June 24, 2003.
Rehearing Denied Aug. 13, 2003.
Harold Johnson, Mitchell Johnson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Henry Gerhardt, St. Charles, MO, for respondent.
Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Wife, Audrey Mudd, appeals from the judgment of the trial court modifying the decree of dissolution of her marriage to husband, Joseph Mudd.
We have reviewed the record on appeal and find that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties, however, have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth, the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).