Case Name: Commonwealth of VIRGINIA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Simon BANKS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-02-03
Citations: 120 F. App'x 973
Docket Number: No. 04-7399
Parties: Commonwealth of VIRGINIA, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Simon BANKS, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 120
Pages: 973–973

Head Matter:
Commonwealth of VIRGINIA, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Simon BANKS, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 04-7399.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 12, 2005.
Decided: Feb. 3, 2005.
Simon Banks, Appellant pro se.
Elliott Casey, Commonwealth’s Attorney’s Office, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Simon Banks appeals from the district court's order dismissing his petition for removal of a state criminal prosecution against him and denying his motion for reconsideration. While the district court properly concluded it lacked jurisdiction over the case, see City of Greenwood, MS. v. Peacock, 384 U.S. 808, 827-28, 86 S.Ct. 1800, 16 L.Ed.2d 944 (1966), the proper disposition upon a determination of the lack of subject matter jurisdiction is to remand the case to the state court, rather than dismiss the action. See 28 U.S.C. § 1446(c)(3), (4), 1447(c) (2000); see, e.g., Virginia v. Wallace, 357 F.2d 105, 106 (4th Cir.1966) (affirming district court order remanding criminal prosecution to state court).
Accordingly, we vacate the district court's dismissal order and the order denying reconsideration and remand this case to the district court with instructions to remand the case to the state court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
VACATED AND REMANDED