Case Name: Harold SMITH and Public Service Mutual Insurance Company, a New York Corporation, Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, for the Use and Benefit of DADE COUNTY, Appellee; Michael Lee CHAMBERS and Public Service Mutual Insurance Company, a New York corporation, Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, for the Use and Benefit of DADE COUNTY, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1975-06-10
Citations: 314 So. 2d 161
Docket Number: Nos. 74-1772, 74-1773
Parties: Harold SMITH and Public Service Mutual Insurance Company, a New York Corporation, Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, for the Use and Benefit of DADE COUNTY, Appellee. Michael Lee CHAMBERS and Public Service Mutual Insurance Company, a New York corporation, Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, for the Use and Benefit of DADE COUNTY, Appellee.
Judges: Before PEARSON, HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 314
Pages: 161–162

Head Matter:
Harold SMITH and Public Service Mutual Insurance Company, a New York Corporation, Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, for the Use and Benefit of DADE COUNTY, Appellee. Michael Lee CHAMBERS and Public Service Mutual Insurance Company, a New York corporation, Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, for the Use and Benefit of DADE COUNTY, Appellee.
Nos. 74-1772, 74-1773.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
June 10, 1975.
Stone, Sostchin & Koss, Miami, for appellants.
Richard E. Gerstein, State’s Atty., and Milton Robbins, Asst. State’s Atty., for ap-pellee.
Before PEARSON, HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
These appeals, by a surety bonding company, are from orders of the circuit court denying the company's motion to vacate es-treature of bonds. We affirm upon a holding that the record does not show that the appellant presented to the trial court the grounds now urged as the basis of these appeals. See Paul v. Kanter, Fla.App.1963, 155 So.2d 402, 403.
Affirmed.