Case Name: MEYERS et al., Appellants, v. STIX et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Common Pleas
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1894-05-17
Citations: 28 N.Y.S. 1144
Docket Number: 
Parties: MEYERS et al., Appellants, v. STIX et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 28
Pages: 1144–1144

Head Matter:
MEYERS et al., Appellants, v. STIX et al., Respondents.
(Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.
May 17, 1894.)
Action by George H. Meyers and another against Lena Stix and another. Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the general term of the city court. 28 N. Y. Supp. 90.
Argued before BOOKSTAVER, BISCHOFF, and PRYOR, JJ.
Charles Meyers, for appellants.
Samuel W. Weiss, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We see little or no difference between the facts as presented on the former trial (reported in 13 N. Y. Supp. 301) and upon this. On the former appeal we held that there was a trilateral agreement between the parties, and we see no reason to recede from that, upon the facts presented in this. We think, therefore, this judgment is proper, and should be affirmed, with costs.