Case Name: Elaine DEROUIN, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. DISCOVER BANK, Defendant/Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2017-12-12
Citations: 543 S.W.3d 57
Docket Number: No. ED 105664
Parties: Elaine DEROUIN, Plaintiff/Appellant,
v.
DISCOVER BANK, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 543
Pages: 57–58

Head Matter:
Elaine DEROUIN, Plaintiff/Appellant,
v.
DISCOVER BANK, Defendant/Respondent.
No. ED 105664
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Filed: December 12, 2017
Application for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied January 30, 2018
Application for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 3, 2018
Nicholas G. Higgins, Eureka, MO, for Plaintiff/Appellant.
Christopher M. Hohn, Matthew D. Guletz, St. Louis, MO, for Defendant/Respondent.
Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Elaine DeRouin (DeRouin) appeals from the trial court's judgment granting Discover Bank's (Discover) Motion to Dismiss Count II of DeRouin's Amended Petition asserting a claim pursuant to the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act, Sections 407.010 to 407.130. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not err in granting Discover's motion and dismissing Count II of DeRouin's Amended Petition. Fenlon v. Union Elec. Co., 266 S.W.3d 852, 854 (Mo. App. E.D. 2008). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
DeRouin's Motion for Attorney's Fees on Appeal is denied.