Case Name: George HICKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-07-31
Citations: 972 S.W.2d 656
Docket Number: No. 73868
Parties: George HICKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before HOFF, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 972
Pages: 656–656

Head Matter:
George HICKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 73868.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
July 31, 1998.
Rosalynn Koch, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah' W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breek K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before HOFF, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, George Hicks, appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, following appellant's conviction for delivery of a controlled substance, RSMo section 195.211 (1994).
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcript and find the motion court's judgment is not clearly erroneous. As no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion, we affirm the judgement pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).