Case Name: Nautilus Land Owners Corporation, Respondent, v. Stuart Gilbert et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1998-09-28
Citations: 253 A.D.2d 862
Docket Number: 
Parties: Nautilus Land Owners Corporation, Respondent, v Stuart Gilbert et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 253
Pages: 862–862

Head Matter:
Nautilus Land Owners Corporation, Respondent, v Stuart Gilbert et al., Appellants.
[678 NYS2d 513]

Opinion:
In an action pursuant to RPAPL article 15 to determine title to real property, the defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rudolph, J.), entered July 1, 1997, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.
The defendants installed a fence around their property in 1982. That same year, the plaintiffs representative wrote to the defendants to inform them that their newly-installed fence was on the plaintiffs property and should be moved. The defendants never moved the fence. This action, which was commenced approximately 13 years later, is barred by the applicable 10-year Statute of Limitations (see, CPLR 212 [a]). Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Copertino and Florio, JJ., concur.