Case Name: FLEETWOOD ENTERPRISES, INC.; Fleetwood Homes of Mississippi, Inc.; Georgia-Pacific Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. William P. GASKAMP, Jr., individually, and as next friends for William P. Gaskamp, III, Derek S. Gaskamp and Brooke A. Gaskamp, Minors; Shannon Gaskamp, individually, and as next friends for William P. Gaskamp, III, Derek S. Gaskamp and Brooke A. Gaskamp, Minors, Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-08-21
Citations: 303 F.3d 570
Docket Number: No. 01-20334
Parties: FLEETWOOD ENTERPRISES, INC.; Fleetwood Homes of Mississippi, Inc.; Georgia-Pacific Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. William P. GASKAMP, Jr., individually, and as next friends for William P. Gaskamp, III, Derek S. Gaskamp and Brooke A. Gaskamp, Minors; Shannon Gaskamp, individually, and as next friends for William P. Gaskamp, III, Derek S. Gaskamp and Brooke A. Gaskamp, Minors, Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: Before JOLLY, SMITH and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 303
Pages: 570–571

Head Matter:
FLEETWOOD ENTERPRISES, INC.; Fleetwood Homes of Mississippi, Inc.; Georgia-Pacific Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. William P. GASKAMP, Jr., individually, and as next friends for William P. Gaskamp, III, Derek S. Gaskamp and Brooke A. Gaskamp, Minors; Shannon Gaskamp, individually, and as next friends for William P. Gaskamp, III, Derek S. Gaskamp and Brooke A. Gaskamp, Minors, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 01-20334.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 21, 2002.
Lionel Mark Schooler, Jackson Walker, Houston, TX, Micahel S. Simpson, Jackson Walker, Austin, TX, for Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc. and Fleetwood Homes of Mississippi, Inc.
Stuart Victor Kusin, Randall W. Wilson, Susman Godfrey, Houston, TX, for Georgia Pacific Corp.
David James Sacks, Kathleen H. Boll, Sacks & Associates, Cletus P. Ernster, III, Taylor, David & Ernster, Houston, TX, for Defendants-Appellants.

Opinion:
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC
Before JOLLY, SMITH and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The Petition for Rehearing is DENIED and no member of this panel nor judge in regular active service on the court having requested that the court be polled on Rehearing En Banc, (Fed. R.App. P. and. 5th Cir. R. 35) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is also DENIED. Nevertheless, we supplement our previous opinion in this case, 280 F.3d 1069 (5th Cir.2002), to note that on remand the district court may consider whether a stay of the nonarbitra-ble claims is appropriate under § 3 of the Federal Arbitration Act.