Case Name: Ozzie B. COLLINS, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-03-10
Citations: 963 S.W.2d 476
Docket Number: No. 71349
Parties: Ozzie B. COLLINS, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before CRAHAN, C.J., and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, J., and GERALD M. SMITH, Senior Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 963
Pages: 476–476

Head Matter:
Ozzie B. COLLINS, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 71349.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
March 10, 1998.
Susan Kister, Clayton, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Barbara K. Chesser, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before CRAHAN, C.J., and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, J., and GERALD M. SMITH, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record provided on this appeal, and have also taken notice of the record from appellant's trial and original consolidated appeal. The motion court's judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears.
An extended opinion would have no pre-cedential value. We have, however, furnished the parties with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).