Case Name: NOAH'S ARK CHRISTIAN CHILD CARE CENTER, INC. and Strassburger McKenna Gutnick & Potter, Trustee v. ZONING HEARING BOARD OF WEST MIFFLIN v. Borough of West Mifflin and Second Baptist Church of Homestead, Petition of Borough of West Mifflin
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2004-05-04
Citations: 851 A.2d 831
Docket Number: 
Parties: NOAH’S ARK CHRISTIAN CHILD CARE CENTER, INC. and Strassburger McKenna Gutnick & Potter, Trustee v. ZONING HEARING BOARD OF WEST MIFFLIN v. Borough of West Mifflin and Second Baptist Church of Homestead, Petition of Borough of West Mifflin.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 851
Pages: 831–831

Head Matter:
NOAH’S ARK CHRISTIAN CHILD CARE CENTER, INC. and Strassburger McKenna Gutnick & Potter, Trustee v. ZONING HEARING BOARD OF WEST MIFFLIN v. Borough of West Mifflin and Second Baptist Church of Homestead, Petition of Borough of West Mifflin.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
May 4, 2004.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
AND NOW, this 4th day of May, 2004, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, LIMITED to the following issue:
Whether the Commonwealth Court committed an error of law by failing to follow its own standard of review in appeals of zoning board decisions where the local zoning board made findings of fact and conclusions of law based on substantial evidence of record and the Commonwealth Court improperly substituted its own judgment as a reviewing court in place of the local zoning board as the trier of fact in weighing evidence and making determinations of credibility?
The matter is to be SUBMITTED.