Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. CARL HERBERT PALMER, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1979-03-12
Citations: 39 Or. App. 207
Docket Number: No. T-8947G, CA 12087
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. CARL HERBERT PALMER, Appellant.
Judges: Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Buttler and Joseph, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 39
Pages: 207–209

Head Matter:
Argued March 1,
affirmed March 12, 1979
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. CARL HERBERT PALMER, Appellant.
(No. T-8947G, CA 12087)
591 P2d 426
Milo Pope, Milton-Freewater, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Gary Luisi, Milton-Freewater.
Mary J. Deits, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were James A. Redden, Attorney General, and Walter L. Barrie, Solicitor General, Salem.
Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Buttler and Joseph, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Rule 5.11 of the Rules for Appeals from District Courts, Or Adv Sh, Vol. 76, No. 40 (January 1,1977), provides:
"Briefs, in referring to evidence, shall make appropriate reference to the location of the evidence. In the case of audio records, the references shall set out the particular tape number, cue number and numerical counter reading in this form: A. R. Tape No. _, Cue No. _, at _ [numerical counter location]. "
Appellant's brief does not comply with this rule.
Affirmed.
Now Rule 25.15 of the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Rules of Appellate Procedure (March 1, 1979).