Case Name: Willie PENNIX, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sgt STANDFORD; Lt Drummond; Office of the Attorney General, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-06-27
Citations: 692 F. App'x 689
Docket Number: No. 17-6259
Parties: Willie PENNIX, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sgt STANDFORD; Lt Drummond; Office of the Attorney General, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 692
Pages: 689–690

Head Matter:
Willie PENNIX, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sgt STANDFORD; Lt Drummond; Office of the Attorney General, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 17-6259
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 22, 2017
Decided: June 27, 2017
Willie Pennix, Appellant Pro Se. Ankush Nayar, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Willie Pennix appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to Defendants in his .42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pennix v. Standford, No. 1:16-cv-01643-RDB, 2017 WL 639225 (D. Md. Feb. 16, 2017). We dispense with oral ar gument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED