Case Name: Brown v. The State
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1924-05-14
Citations: 32 Ga. App. 355
Docket Number: 15424
Parties: Brown v. The State.
Judges: Luke cmd Bloodworth, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 32
Pages: 355–356

Head Matter:
15424.
Brown v. The State.

Opinion:
Broyles, C. J.
1. The exclusion of certain love letters that the female alleged to have been seduced by the defendant wrote to á third person after the alleged seduction was not error. See, in this connection, Keller v. State, 102 Ga. 506 (7) (31 S. E. 92); Davis v. State, 31 Ga. App. 523 (3) (121 S. E. 136).
Decided May 14, 1924.
Indictment for seduction; from Gwinnett superior court — Judge Russell. January 26, 1924.
I. L. Oakes, 0. A. Nix, for plaintiff in error.
Pemberton Cooley, solicitor-general, Kelley & Kelley, contra.
2. The verdict was authorized by the evidence and the overruling of the motion for a new trial was not error.
Judgment affirmed.
Luke cmd Bloodworth, JJ., concur.