Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ramiro LOPEZ-AGUIRRE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-08-19
Citations: 343 F. App'x 217
Docket Number: No. 08-10054
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ramiro LOPEZ-AGUIRRE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: KLEINFELD, M. SMITH, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 343
Pages: 217–218

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ramiro LOPEZ-AGUIRRE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-10054.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 11, 2009.
Filed Aug. 19, 2009.
Jeffrey Schenk, Assistant U.S., Barbara Valliere, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Jose, CA, for Plaintiff-Ap-pellee.
Katherine Alfieri, Esquire, Law Office of Katherine Alfieri, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: KLEINFELD, M. SMITH, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Ramiro Lopez-Aguirre appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 65-month sentence imposed for illegal reentry following deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Lopez-Aguirre's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.