Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rafael CASTANON-ESPITIA, aka Trigger, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-03-04
Citations: 369 F. App'x 809
Docket Number: No. 08-50438
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rafael CASTANON-ESPITIA, aka Trigger, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 369
Pages: 809–810

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rafael CASTANON-ESPITIA, aka Trigger, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-50438.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 16, 2010.
Filed March 4, 2010.
Michael J. Raphael, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Jacob J.H. Yim, Special Assistant U.S., Robert Andre Rabbani, Assistant U.S., United States Attorney Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Rafael Castanon-Espitia, California City, CA, pro se.
Davina T. Chen, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Rafael Castanon-Espitia appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 57-month sentence for being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Casta-non-Espitia's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.