Case Name: Nicholas R. McCARTHY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. The PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1955-11-23
Citations: 227 F.2d 382
Docket Number: No. 108, Docket 23725
Parties: Nicholas R. McCARTHY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. The PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 227
Pages: 382–383

Head Matter:
Nicholas R. McCARTHY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. The PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 108, Docket 23725.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued Nov. 9, 1955.
Decided Nov. 23, 1955.
David J. Mountan, Jr., New York City (Conboy, Hewitt, O’Brien & Board-man, New York City, on the brief), for def endant-app ellant.
Seymour Schwartz, New York City (Bromsen & Gammerman, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff-appel-lee.
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
There was sufficient evidence to present an issue for the jury in support of plaintiff's contention that the operator of the electric baggage truck might have chosen a safe path on the other side of the station platform, instead of the course he followed — next the train discharging and receiving passengers. See, e. g., Callaghan v. City of New York, 283 App.Div. 388, 128 N.Y.S.2d 206.
Affirmed.