Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Leonel Garcia JUAREZ, also known as Leonel Juarez Garcia, also known as Leonel Garcia-Juarez, also known as Leonel Garcia, also known as Leonel J. Garcia, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-02-17
Citations: 461 F. App'x 388
Docket Number: No. 11-20401
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Leonel Garcia JUAREZ, also known as Leonel Juarez Garcia, also known as Leonel Garcia-Juarez, also known as Leonel Garcia, also known as Leonel J. Garcia, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before HIGGINBOTHAM, GARZA, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 461
Pages: 388–389

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Leonel Garcia JUAREZ, also known as Leonel Juarez Garcia, also known as Leonel Garcia-Juarez, also known as Leonel Garcia, also known as Leonel J. Garcia, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-20401
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Feb. 17, 2012.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Timothy William Crooks, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, GARZA, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Leonel Garcia Juarez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. Cali fornia, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United, States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Garcia Juarez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.