Case Name: ALBERT GRANOWITZ, RESPONDENT, v. HAY FOUNDRY AND IRON WORKS, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1932-10-17
Citations: 109 N.J.L. 394
Docket Number: 
Parties: ALBERT GRANOWITZ, RESPONDENT, v. HAY FOUNDRY AND IRON WORKS, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 109
Pages: 394–394

Head Matter:
ALBERT GRANOWITZ, RESPONDENT, v. HAY FOUNDRY AND IRON WORKS, APPELLANT.
Argued May 23, 1932 —
Decided October 17, 1932.
For the respondent, Samuel Greenstone.
For the appellant, Heine & Laird.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion died in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Teenchakd, Lloyd, Bodustb, Donges, Beogan, Yan Btjskiek, Kays, Deae, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.