Case Name: Contel Credit Corporation, Appellee, v. Rosenblatt, d.b.a. Orwell Coach Lines, Appellant
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1988-05-16
Citations: 43 Ohio App. 3d 113
Docket Number: No. 53813
Parties: Contel Credit Corporation, Appellee, v. Rosenblatt, d.b.a. Orwell Coach Lines, Appellant.
Judges: Nahra, C.J., and Ann McMana-MON, J., concur.
Reporter: Ohio Appellate Reports, Third Series
Volume: 43
Pages: 113–113

Head Matter:
Contel Credit Corporation, Appellee, v. Rosenblatt, d.b.a. Orwell Coach Lines, Appellant.
(No. 53813 —
Decided May 16, 1988.)
Dennis R. Toed, for appellee.
Daniel M. Roth, for appellant.

Opinion:
Markus, J.
Defendant presents ten assigned errors. However, his brief contains nothing more than a list of the proposed errors. He has failed to comply with App. R. 12(A), which requires an appellant to brief and argue each assigned error separately. Therefore, we summarily reject the defendant's appeal. Further, pursuant to App. R. 23, we direct that appellant shall pay appellee $100 toward appellee's attorney fees in defending a frivolous appeal.
Judgment accordingly.
Nahra, C.J., and Ann McMana-MON, J., concur.