Case Name: Disciplinary Counsel v. Hofelich
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2008-07-28
Citations: 119 Ohio St. 3d 1205
Docket Number: No. 2007-0748
Parties: Disciplinary Counsel v. Hofelich.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 119
Pages: 1205–1205

Head Matter:
Disciplinary Counsel v. Hofelich.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Hofelich, 119 Ohio St.3d 1205, 2008-Ohio-4083.]
(No. 2007-0748
Submitted July 21, 2008
Decided July 28, 2008.)

Opinion:
{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, James Hofelich, Attorney Registration No. 0033009, last known business address in Westlake, Ohio.
{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of August 29, 2007, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of six months, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,
{¶ 3} It is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.
{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.
{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Hofelich, 115 Ohio St.3d 14, 2007-Ohio-4269, 873 N.E.2d 821.
Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.