Case Name: Robert Earl VANCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Nfn IRBY, Officer; Nfn Rhodes, Sergeant; J. Williams, Sergeant; Officer McDaniel, Defendants-Appellees, and Perry Correctional Institution, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-12-07
Citations: 157 F. App'x 618
Docket Number: No. 05-6522
Parties: Robert Earl VANCE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Nfn IRBY, Officer; Nfn Rhodes, Sergeant; J. Williams, Sergeant; Officer McDaniel, Defendants—Appellees, and Perry Correctional Institution, Defendant.
Judges: Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 157
Pages: 618–618

Head Matter:
Robert Earl VANCE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Nfn IRBY, Officer; Nfn Rhodes, Sergeant; J. Williams, Sergeant; Officer McDaniel, Defendants—Appellees, and Perry Correctional Institution, Defendant.
No. 05-6522.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 22, 2005.
Decided Dec. 7, 2005.
Robert Earl Vance, Appellant Pro Se. William Benson Darwin, Jr., Ginger Dee Goforth, Holcombe, Bomar, Gunn & Bradford, P.A., Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Robert Earl Vance appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Vance v. Irby, No. CA-03-3826-8-27 (D.S.C. Mar. 29, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED