Case Name: Casitdel WOOTEN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2018-10-16
Citations: 559 S.W.3d 114
Docket Number: No. ED 105810
Parties: Casitdel WOOTEN, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 559
Pages: 114–115

Head Matter:
Casitdel WOOTEN, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 105810
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Filed: October 16, 2018
Randall Brachman, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Movant/Appellant.
Garrick F. D. Aplin, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent/Respondent.
Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Casitdel Wooten appeals the motion court's judgment dismissing his Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and we conclude the motion court did not err. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).