Case Name: Jin RIE, an individual d.b.a. East West Institute, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Alan L. ROSEN, an individual; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-11-19
Citations: 255 F. App'x 176
Docket Number: No. 07-55342
Parties: Jin RIE, an individual d.b.a. East West Institute, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Alan L. ROSEN, an individual; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before: McKEOWN, TALLMAN and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 255
Pages: 176–176

Head Matter:
Jin RIE, an individual d.b.a. East West Institute, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Alan L. ROSEN, an individual; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
No. 07-55342.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 13, 2007.
Filed Nov. 19, 2007.
Jin Rie, Los Angeles, CA, pro se.
Alan L. Rosen, Esq., Rosen & Loeb, Sherman Oaks, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: McKEOWN, TALLMAN and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
A review of appellant's response to the court's order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.