Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Curtis BASKETT, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1993-05-25
Citations: 855 S.W.2d 429
Docket Number: No. 62537
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Curtis BASKETT, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before AHRENS, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 855
Pages: 429–429

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Curtis BASKETT, Defendant/Appellant.
No. 62537.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
May 25, 1993.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied June 23, 1993.
Henry W. Cummings, St. Charles, for defendant/appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Hugh L. Marshall, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff/respondent.
Before AHRENS, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of conspiracy to commit first degree robbery, § 564.016, RSMo 1986. He was sentenced by the court as a class X offender to a term of six years' imprisonment. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no prece-dential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).