Case Name: Matthew Otis CHARLES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Troy WILLIAMSON, Warden, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-09-04
Citations: 73 F. App'x 642
Docket Number: No. 03-6682
Parties: Matthew Otis CHARLES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Troy WILLIAMSON, Warden, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 73
Pages: 642–643

Head Matter:
Matthew Otis CHARLES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Troy WILLIAMSON, Warden, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 03-6682.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 28, 2003.
Decided Sept. 4, 2003.
Matthew Otis Charles, Appellant pro se. Michael Lee Keller, Office of the United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Matthew Otis Charles, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition styled as an application under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. See Charles v. Williamson, No. CA-03-104-5 (S.D.W.Va. Apr. 11, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.