Case Name: Nordbanken AB, Formerly Known as Nordbanken, Respondent, v. Old Road Development Company et al., Defendants, and Adam Backstrom, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1997-02-24
Citations: 236 A.D.2d 595
Docket Number: 
Parties: Nordbanken AB, Formerly Known as Nordbanken, Respondent, v Old Road Development Company et al., Defen dants, and Adam Backstrom, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 236
Pages: 595–596

Head Matter:
Nordbanken AB, Formerly Known as Nordbanken, Respondent, v Old Road Development Company et al., Defen dants, and Adam Backstrom, Appellant.
[654 NYS2d 675]

Opinion:
—In an action to foreclose both a first and second mortgage, the defendant Adam Backstrom appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Fredman, J.), entered January 22, 1996, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was for summary judgment against him.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiff summary judgment against the defendant Adam Backstrom since, upon the plaintiffs making out a prima facie case, that defendant failed to present any genuine factual issues which would preclude summary relief (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557). O'Brien, J. P., Thompson, Joy and Goldstein, JJ., concur.