Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John Fred WOOLARD and Dempsey A. Bruner, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1993-05-04
Citations: 990 F.2d 819
Docket Number: No. 92-7006
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John Fred WOOLARD and Dempsey A. Bruner, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILLIAMS, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 990
Pages: 819–822

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John Fred WOOLARD and Dempsey A. Bruner, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 92-7006.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
May 4, 1993.
Andrew McBride, Alexandria, VA, Jay T. Golden, Asst. U.S. Atty., George Phillips; U.S. Atty., Biloxi, MS, Robert Erickson, Deputy Chief, Crim. Div. Appellate See., Dept, of Justice, Washington, DC, for plaintiff-appellant.
John H. Holdridge, Miss, and La. Capital Trial Assistance Proj., New Orleans, LA, James L. Davis, III, Gulfport, MS (Court-appointed), Merrida P. Coxwell, Jr., Jackson, MS (Court-appointed), for Woolard.
Chester D. Nicholson, Gulfport, MS, Dennis Sweet, III, Jackson, MS (Court-appointed), for Bruner.

Opinion:
ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion January 11, 1993, 5 Cir., 1993, 981 F.2d 756)
Before WILLIAMS, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Treating the suggestion for rehearing en banc as a petition for panel rehearing, the petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. The judges in regular active service of this Court having been polled at the request of one of said judges and a majority of said judges not having voted in favor of it (Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and Local Rule 35), the suggestion for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.