Case Name: Alexander H. BRADLEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Jon Ozmit; Mark Price, Major; A.J. Padula, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-06-29
Citations: 385 F. App'x 345
Docket Number: No. 10-1339
Parties: Alexander H. BRADLEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Jon Ozmit; Mark Price, Major; A.J. Padula, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 385
Pages: 345–346

Head Matter:
Alexander H. BRADLEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Jon Ozmit; Mark Price, Major; A.J. Padula, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 10-1339.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 24, 2010.
Decided: June 29, 2010.
Alexander H. Bradley, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Roy F. Laney, Thomas Lowndes Pope, Heath McAMn Stewart, III, Riley, Pope & Laney, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Alexander H. Bradley, Jr., appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants in his complaint alleging that he was terminated from his employment in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981, 1983 (2006), and South Carolina law. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bradley v. South Carolina Dep't of Corr., No. 3:08-cv-02510-JFA (D.S.C. Mar. 5, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.