Case Name: Stanley Francis SILVA, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1968-04-16
Citations: 394 F.2d 3
Docket Number: No. 21978
Parties: Stanley Francis SILVA, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 394
Pages: 3–3

Head Matter:
Stanley Francis SILVA, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 21978.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
April 16, 1968.
Milton W. B. Choy (argued), Honolulu, Hawaii, for appellant.
Michael D. Hong (argued), Asst. U. S. Atty., Yoshimi Hayashi, U. S. Atty., James F. Ventura, Asst. U. S. Atty., Honolulu, Hawaii, for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS, BARNES and HAMLIN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The defendant's in-custody confession was inadmissible for lack of a Miranda-type warning, inasmuch as his trial was commenced post -Miranda. Miranda v. State of Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966).
The judgment of conviction is reversed and the case remanded for a new trial. Johnson v. State of New Jersey, 384 U.S. 719, 721, 86 S.Ct. 1772, 16 L.Ed.2d 882 (1966). Cf. Groshart v. United States, 392 F.2d 172, (9th Cir. 1968).