Case Name: Molina v. United States; Crowley Maritime Corp. et al. v. Zipfel et al.; Halliburton Co. et al. v. Zipfel et al.; In re Sowell; Spiegel v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Company of Chicago et al.; Morris v. Compagnie Maritime des Chargeurs Reunis, S. A., et al.; Fitzgerald v. Montana Department of Family Services et al.; Bell, Individually and dba Wes Outdoor Advertising Co. v. New Jersey et al.; Rose v. Texas; Hyslep et ux. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue; Roberts v. Roberts; Fisher v. Oklahoma; Kyles v. Louisiana; Gardner v. North Carolina; Knox v. Texas; Levert v. Estelle, Warden, et al.; Miranda v. California; May v. Pro-Guard, Inc.; Williams v. Planned Parenthood Federation of America et al.; Trotz, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Trotz v. Lawruk et al., t/a Penn Alto Hotel; Spencer v. Illinois; Trotz v. Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation Board of Review; Foster v. Illinois; Waters v. Neubert et al.; Johnson v. Illinois; McGee v. Randall Division of Textron, Inc., of Grenada, Mississippi; Flores et al. v. Municipality of Carolina
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1988-08-04
Citations: 487 U.S. 1245
Docket Number: No. 87-1122; No. 87-1391; No. 87-1251; No. 87-1492; No. 87-1523; No. 87-1582; No. 87-1601; No. 87-1694; No. 87-1820; No. 87-5425; No. 87-6008; No. 87-6096; No. 87-6196; No. 87-6365; No. 87-6486; No. 87-6746; No. 87-6816; No. 87-6817; No. 87-6863; No. 87-6864; No. 87-6875; No. 87-6905; No. 87-6912; No. 87-6926; No. 87-6959; No. 87-7017
Parties: Molina v. United States, Crowley Maritime Corp. et al. v. Zipfel et al., Halliburton Co. et al. v. Zipfel et al., In re Sowell, Spiegel v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Company of Chicago et al., Morris v. Compagnie Maritime des Chargeurs Reunis, S. A., et al., Fitzgerald v. Montana Department of Family Services et al., Bell, Individually and dba Wes Outdoor Advertising Co. v. New Jersey et al., Rose v. Texas, Hyslep et ux. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Roberts v. Roberts, Fisher v. Oklahoma, Kyles v. Louisiana, Gardner v. North Carolina, Knox v. Texas, Levert v. Estelle, Warden, et al., Miranda v. California, May v. Pro-Guard, Inc., Williams v. Planned Parenthood Federation of America et al., Trotz, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Trotz v. Lawruk et al., t/a Penn Alto Hotel, Spencer v. Illinois, Trotz v. Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Foster v. Illinois, Waters v. Neubert et al., Johnson v. Illinois, McGee v. Randall Division of Textron, Inc., of Grenada, Mississippi, Flores et al. v. Municipality of Carolina,
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 487
Pages: 1245–1246

Head Matter:
August 4, 1988
No.-.
No. 87-1122.
No. 87-1391.
No. 87-1251.
No. 87-1492.
No. 87-1523.
No. 87-1582.
No. 87-1601.
Molina v. United States, Crowley Maritime Corp. et al. v. Zipfel et al., Halliburton Co. et al. v. Zipfel et al., In re Sowell, Spiegel v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Company of Chicago et al., Morris v. Compagnie Maritime des Chargeurs Reunis, S. A., et al., Fitzgerald v. Montana Department of Family Services et al., Bell, Individually and dba Wes Outdoor Advertising Co. v. New Jersey et al., Rose v. Texas, Hyslep et ux. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Roberts v. Roberts, Fisher v. Oklahoma, Kyles v. Louisiana, Gardner v. North Carolina, Knox v. Texas, Levert v. Estelle, Warden, et al., Miranda v. California, May v. Pro-Guard, Inc., Williams v. Planned Parenthood Federation of America et al., Trotz, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Trotz v. Lawruk et al., t/a Penn Alto Hotel, Spencer v. Illinois, Trotz v. Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Foster v. Illinois, Waters v. Neubert et al., Johnson v. Illinois, McGee v. Randall Division of Textron, Inc., of Grenada, Mississippi, Flores et al. v. Municipality of Carolina,

Opinion:
ante, p. 1214;
486 U. S. 1054;
486 U. S. 1054;
484 U. S. 1057;
485 U. S. 1009;
485 U. S. 1022;
ante, p. 1201;
486 U. S. 1001;
No. 87-1694.
No. 87-1820.
No. 87-5425.
No. 87-6008.
No. 87-6096.
No. 87-6196.
No. 87-6365.
No. 87-6486.
No. 87-6746.
No. 87-6816.
No. 87-6817.
No. 87-6863.
No. 87-6864.
No. 87-6875.
No. 87-6905.
No. 87-6912.
No. 87-6926.
No. 87-6959.
No. 87-7017.
486 U. S. 1055;
486 U. S. 1044;
485 U. S. 963;
486 U. S. 1061;
486 U. S. 1027;
486 U. S. 1061;
486 U.. S. 1061;
ante, p. 1207;
486 U. S. 1038;
486 U. S. 1045;
486 U. S. 1047;
ante, p. 1220;
ante, p. 1208;
ante, p. 1208;
486 U. S. 1047;
ante, p. 1209;
486 U. S. 1047;
ante, p. 1209; and
ante, p. 1239. Petitions for rehearing denied.