Case Name: Royal Mack SUMMERVILLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1982-01-20
Citations: 408 So. 2d 836
Docket Number: No. 81-784
Parties: Royal Mack SUMMERVILLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: LETTS, C. J., and HERSEY and DELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 408
Pages: 836–836

Head Matter:
Royal Mack SUMMERVILLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 81-784.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jan. 20, 1982.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Tatjana Ostapoff, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, and Royal Mack Porter, a/k/a Summerville, Lake Butler, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert L. Bogen, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on the authority of State v. Sylvester, 401 So.2d 1123 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). We recognize that State v. Sylvester is in direct conflict with Carson v. Bishop, 378 So.2d 882 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).
LETTS, C. J., and HERSEY and DELL, JJ., concur.