Case Name: Dianna PETERMAN; B.P., A Minor Child, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Pat CAUSEY; Elizabeth Spillman; Melinda Norman; Richard Gentry; Alicia Storie; Heather Hennessee; Casey Puett; Aimee Fairchild; John Boyd; Robert Brady; C.V. Morris; Ralph D. Yount; Alan Lecroy; Laura Gentry; Unknown, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-05-28
Citations: 521 F. App'x 211
Docket Number: No. 13-1338
Parties: Dianna PETERMAN; B.P., A Minor Child, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Pat CAUSEY; Elizabeth Spillman; Melinda Norman; Richard Gentry; Alicia Storie; Heather Hennessee; Casey Puett; Aimee Fairchild; John Boyd; Robert Brady; C.V. Morris; Ralph D. Yount; Alan Lecroy; Laura Gentry; Unknown, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 521
Pages: 211–212

Head Matter:
Dianna PETERMAN; B.P., A Minor Child, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Pat CAUSEY; Elizabeth Spillman; Melinda Norman; Richard Gentry; Alicia Storie; Heather Hennessee; Casey Puett; Aimee Fairchild; John Boyd; Robert Brady; C.V. Morris; Ralph D. Yount; Alan Lecroy; Laura Gentry; Unknown, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 13-1338.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 23, 2013.
Decided: May 28, 2013.
Dianna Peterman, B.P., Appellants Pro Se.
Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Dianna Peterman and B.P., a minor child, appeal the district court's order denying relief on them 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2006) complaint and remanding child custody proceedings to state court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Peterman v. Causey, No. 5:13-cv-00029-RLV, 2013 WL 878308 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 8, 2013). We also deny Peterman's motion for a stay of the state court proceedings. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.