Case Name: Carlos OSORIO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1983-10-04
Citations: 438 So. 2d 935
Docket Number: No. 82-1720
Parties: Carlos OSORIO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before HENDRY, HUBBART and JOR-GENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 438
Pages: 935–935

Head Matter:
Carlos OSORIO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 82-1720.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 4, 1983.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Paul & Thomson and Samuel A. Terilli, Special Asst. Public Defenders, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Calianne P. Lantz, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before HENDRY, HUBBART and JOR-GENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court's denial of the defendant's motion to suppress upon a holding that the evidence, while conflicting, was sufficient for the trial court to conclude that the defendant possessed a sufficient knowledge of the English language to give a valid consent.
We have considered the other issues raised by the appellant and find them to be without merit. See State v. Millwood, 430 So.2d 563 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Login v. State, 394 So.2d 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).
Affirmed.