Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Brian BURNEY, Defendant/Appellant.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2018-08-14
Citations: 553 S.W.3d 891
Docket Number: No. ED 105631
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent,
v.
Brian BURNEY, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Mary K. Hoff, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 553
Pages: 891–892

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent,
v.
Brian BURNEY, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 105631
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
FILED: August 14, 2018
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: Jeff Christian Schneider, Office of the State Public Defender, 1000 West Nifong, Bldg. 7, Ste. 100, Columbia, MO 65203.
ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Robert Jefferson Bartholomew, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.
Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Mary K. Hoff, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Brian Burney ("Defendant") appeals from the judgment upon his convictions after a bench trial for one count of aggravated stalking, in violation of Section 565.225.3 RSMo 2000 and one count of second degree sexual misconduct, in violation of Section 566.095. Defendant was sentenced to concurrent sentences of four years of imprisonment on the aggravated stalking count and fifteen days on the sexual misconduct count, and the trial court retained jurisdiction, directing Defendant to complete 120 days of shock incarceration pursuant to Section 559.115. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
Unless otherwise indicated, all further statutory references are to RSMo 2000 as amended.