Case Name: Carl E. BRANT, Appellant, v. SWIFT-ECKRICH, INC., dba Armour Swift Eckrich Consumer Products Company, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-04-27
Citations: 6 F. App'x 533
Docket Number: No. 00-3256
Parties: Carl E. BRANT, Appellant, v. SWIFT-ECKRICH, INC., dba Armour Swift Eckrich Consumer Products Company, Appellee.
Judges: Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 6
Pages: 533–533

Head Matter:
Carl E. BRANT, Appellant, v. SWIFT-ECKRICH, INC., dba Armour Swift Eckrich Consumer Products Company, Appellee.
No. 00-3256.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted April 20, 2001.
Decided April 27, 2001.
Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Carl E. Brant appeals the district court's dismissal of Brant's disability-discrimination suit against his former employer. We have reviewed the record and agree Brant did not meet the statutory prerequisites for filing his lawsuit. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(e)(l) (charge of discrimination must be filed with Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) within 180 days of unlawful employment practice); Boersig v. Union Elec. Co., 219 F.3d 816, 821 (8th Cir.2000) (reasonable-accommodation claim was barred because plaintiff filed EEOC charge after time prescribed by § 2000e-5(e)), cert. denied, 581 U.S. 1113, 121 S.Ct. 857, 148 L.Ed.2d 771 (2001). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.