Case Name: Kelsey D. BARTLETT, Appellant, v. Dr. Robert E. WEIMER et al., Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1957-04-16
Citations: 244 F.2d 955
Docket Number: No. 13063
Parties: Kelsey D. BARTLETT, Appellant, v. Dr. Robert E. WEIMER et al., Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 244
Pages: 955–956

Head Matter:
Kelsey D. BARTLETT, Appellant, v. Dr. Robert E. WEIMER et al., Appellees.
No. 13063.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
April 16, 1957.
Kelsey D. Bartlett, Toledo, Ohio, pro se.
Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, Toledo, Ohio, Wm. Saxbe, Huntington Carlile and Thomas L. Startzman, Columbus, Ohio, Robert O. Stout, Marion, Ohio, for appellees.
Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and McALLISTER and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel for appel-lees, and Kelsey D. Bartlett, appellant in propria persona, and the court being duly advised,
Now therefore, It is Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the order of the district court sustaining a motion for an order quashing service of process upon appellees and dismissing the action as to them, be affirmed upon the authority of Marten v. Holbrook, C.C.N.D.Cal., 157 F. 716; Whittington v. Johnston, D.C., 102 F.Supp. 352, affirmed, 5 Cir., 201 F.2d 810; and Kenney v. Fox, 6 Cir., 232 F.2d 288, relied upon by Judge Kloeb in his order sustaining appellees' motion.