Case Name: Joseph MARSHALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2013-11-22
Citations: 127 So. 3d 720
Docket Number: No. 5D13-848
Parties: Joseph MARSHALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: EVANDER, COHEN and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 127
Pages: 720–720

Head Matter:
Joseph MARSHALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D13-848.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Nov. 22, 2013.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Eliza Puchalski, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marjorie Vincent-Tripp, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
After a review of the presentence investigation report, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in imposing drug and alcohol treatment related requirements as special conditions of probation. See Biller v. State, 618 So.2d 734 (Fla.1993); Austin v. State, 67 So.3d 403, 406-07 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).
AFFIRMED.
EVANDER, COHEN and WALLIS, JJ., concur.