Case Name: Dean Earl Hammel, appellant, v. Transit Authority of the City of Omaha, doing business as Metro Area Transit, appellee
Court: Nebraska Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Nebraska
Decision Date: 1990-07-06
Citations: 235 Neb. 702
Docket Number: No. 88-831
Parties: Dean Earl Hammel, appellant, v. Transit Authority of the City of Omaha, doing business as Metro Area Transit, appellee.
Judges: Hastings, C.J., Boslaugh, White, Caporale, Shanahan, Grant, and Fahrnbruch, J J.
Reporter: Nebraska Reports
Volume: 235
Pages: 702–702

Head Matter:
Dean Earl Hammel, appellant, v. Transit Authority of the City of Omaha, doing business as Metro Area Transit, appellee.
457 N.W.2d 274
Filed July 6, 1990.
No. 88-831.
David F. Eaton and James E. Schaefer, of Gallup & Schaefer, for appellant.
Timothy M. Kenny and Sandra L. Maass, of Abrahams, Kaslow & Cassman, for appellee.
Hastings, C.J., Boslaugh, White, Caporale, Shanahan, Grant, and Fahrnbruch, J J.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Upon consideration of the record, briefs, and recommendation of the Appellate Division of the District Court, we determine that the record supports a finding that the negligence of the plaintiff-appellant was more than slight when compared to the negligence, if any, of the defendant-appellee, which was less than gross, and accordingly the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.