Case Name: David Goldman Co., Inc., Appellant, v. Clarence Van Wicklin, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1929-03
Citations: 226 A.D. 724
Docket Number: 
Parties: David Goldman Co., Inc., Appellant, v. Clarence Van Wicklin, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 226
Pages: 724–724

Head Matter:
David Goldman Co., Inc., Appellant, v. Clarence Van Wicklin, Respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment of County Court reversed and judgment of City. Court affirmed, with costs in this court and in County Court to the appellant, on the ground that the act of the plaintiff in returning to the vendee the sum of $500 previously deposited by the vendee with the plaintiff was not a violation of the contract between the plaintiff and defendant, inasmuch as the defendant, having failed to carry out the contract, became obligated thereby to return such deposit to the vendee. All concur. Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Edgeomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.