Case Name: Joseph POWELL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2010-02-16
Citations: 303 S.W.3d 163
Docket Number: No. ED 92406
Parties: Joseph POWELL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 303
Pages: 163–164

Head Matter:
Joseph POWELL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 92406.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Feb. 16, 2010.
Alexandra Johnson, Saint Louis, MO, for Movant/Appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jayne T. Woods, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent/Respondent.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Joseph Powell appeals from the motion court's denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.15. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2007, unless otherwise indicated.