Case Name: Rienoehl v. Huonker, City Clerk, et al.
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1902-04-01
Citations: 66 Ohio St. 657
Docket Number: No. 7263
Parties: Rienoehl v. Huonker, City Clerk, et al.
Judges: Williams, C. J., Burket, Spear, Davis, Shauck and Price, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, New Service
Volume: 66
Pages: 657–657

Head Matter:
No. 7263.
Rienoehl v. Huonker, City Clerk, et al.
(Decided April 1, 1902.)
Error to the Circuit Court of Clark county.
Mr. J. K. Mower and Mr. D. F. Beinoehl, for plaintiff in error.
Mr. I). Z GdMner, city solicitor, for defendants in error.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed on the ground that the request should have been made of the solicitor in office,, and not of his predecessor; and on the further ground that injunction is not the proper remedy. The remedy is quo warranto.
Williams, C. J., Burket, Spear, Davis, Shauck and Price, JJ., concur.