Case Name: In re Michael MORGAN, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-06-10
Citations: 717 F.3d 1186
Docket Number: No. 13-11175
Parties: In re Michael MORGAN, Petitioner.
Judges: Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS, WILSON, PRYOR, MARTIN and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 717
Pages: 1186–1202

Head Matter:
In re Michael MORGAN, Petitioner.
No. 13-11175.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
June 10, 2013.
Chet Kaufman, Randolph Patterson Murrell, Fed. Pub. Defenders, Tallahassee, FL, for Petitioner.
Herbert Stanley Lindsey, Pamela C. Marsh, U.S. Attys., Tallahassee, FL, for United States of America, Successive Habeas Respondent.
Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS, WILSON, PRYOR, MARTIN and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
BY THE COURT:
The court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the Court and a majority of the Circuit Judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor of it (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure), the Suggestion of Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.