Case Name: Christopher J. MULLE, Appellant, v. Earl R. STIEFEL and Gertrude M. Stiefel, his wife, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1972-09-20
Citations: 267 So. 2d 38
Docket Number: No. 71-1101
Parties: Christopher J. MULLE, Appellant, v. Earl R. STIEFEL and Gertrude M. Stiefel, his wife, Appellees.
Judges: REED, C. J., and WALDEN and MA-GER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 267
Pages: 38–38

Head Matter:
Christopher J. MULLE, Appellant, v. Earl R. STIEFEL and Gertrude M. Stiefel, his wife, Appellees.
No. 71-1101.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Sept. 20, 1972.
A. N. Spence, Miami, for appellant.
James A. Scott, of Saunders, Curtis, Ginestra, & Gore, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Our review of this appeal leads us to conclude that in the interest of justice, the final judgment should be reversed and the appellant accorded a new trial in light of Hutchison v. Tompkins, Fla.App.1972, 259 So.2d 129 — which was decided after the final judgment was rendered. On remand, the trial court shall permit the parties to make such amendments to their pleadings as they may be advised.
Reversed and remanded with instructions.
REED, C. J., and WALDEN and MA-GER, JJ., concur.