Case Name: Jean ALABRE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Brian CLEMENS, I/O, Deputy Chief Judicial Marshal, Lawrence J. Callahan, Chief Judicial Marshal, I/O, State of Connecticut Judicial Branch, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-07-01
Citations: 328 F. App'x 56
Docket Number: No. 08-3651-cv
Parties: Jean ALABRE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Brian CLEMENS, I/O, Deputy Chief Judicial Marshal, Lawrence J. Callahan, Chief Judicial Marshal, I/O, State of Connecticut Judicial Branch, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: PRESENT: Hon. B.D. PARKER, Hon. RICHARD C. WESLEY, Circuit Judges, and Hon. MIRIAM GOLDMAN CEDARBAUM, District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 328
Pages: 56–56

Head Matter:
Jean ALABRE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Brian CLEMENS, I/O, Deputy Chief Judicial Marshal, Lawrence J. Callahan, Chief Judicial Marshal, I/O, State of Connecticut Judicial Branch, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 08-3651-cv.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
July 1, 2009.
Josephine S. Miller, Danbury, CT for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Antoría D. Howard, Assistant Attorney General, for Richard Blumenthal, Attorney General for the State of Connecticut, Hartford, CT, for Defendants-Appellees.
PRESENT: Hon. B.D. PARKER, Hon. RICHARD C. WESLEY, Circuit Judges, and Hon. MIRIAM GOLDMAN CEDARBAUM, District Judge.
The Honorable Miriam Goldman Cedarbaum, United States District Judge, Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
SUMMARY ORDER
Plaintiff-Appellant Jean Alabre ("Ala-bre") appeals from a June 19, 2008 judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Nevas, J.). The district court granted the summary judgment motion of Defendants-Appellees Brian Clemens ("Clemens"), Lawrence Callahan ("Callahan"), and the Judicial Branch of the State of Connecticut ("Judicial Branch") and dismissed Alabre's claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress and employment discrimination pursuant to Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution and Connecticut law. We assume the parties' familiarity with the underlying facts, procedural history and issues on appeal.
We AFFIRM for substantially the same the reasons stated by the district court in its thoughtful opinion.