Case Name: In re Jong Gil KIM; Jung W. Kim, Debtors. CHO HUNG BANK, a Korean corporation, Appellee, v. Jong Gil KIM; Jung W. Kim, aka Jung Wha Kim aka Jung W. Cho Kim dba Gill & Company, Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1995-08-23
Citations: 62 F.3d 1511
Docket Number: No. 94-55308
Parties: In re Jong Gil KIM; Jung W. Kim, Debtors. CHO HUNG BANK, a Korean corporation, Appellee, v. Jong Gil KIM; Jung W. Kim, aka Jung Wha Kim aka Jung W. Cho Kim dba Gill & Company, Appellants.
Judges: Before: THOMPSON, LEAVY, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 62
Pages: 1511–1511

Head Matter:
In re Jong Gil KIM; Jung W. Kim, Debtors. CHO HUNG BANK, a Korean corporation, Appellee, v. Jong Gil KIM; Jung W. Kim, aka Jung Wha Kim aka Jung W. Cho Kim dba Gill & Company, Appellants.
No. 94-55308.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 11, 1995 .
Decided Aug. 23, 1995.
David Zweig, Los Angeles, CA, for appellants.
Henry Gweon, Law Offices of Jang W. Lee, Los Angeles, CA, for appellee.
Before: THOMPSON, LEAVY, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for submission on the record and briefs and without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a) and Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4.

Opinion:
ORDER
The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel held that fraudulently inducing a creditor's extension of the due date for repayment of a loan was sufficient under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2) to support a claim of nondischargeability against a debtor in bankruptcy, and it was not necessary for the creditor to show that "new money" was lent to the debtor. We agree. The opinion of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel in In re Kim, 163 B.R. 157 (9th Cir. BAP 1994) is hereby adopted as the opinion of this Court.
AFFIRMED.