Case Name: In the Matter of the Application of William McGovern, Respondent, for a Mandamus Order against Theodore Toplitz and Others, as Commissioners of Civil Service of the City of Long Beach, and Others, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1934-12
Citations: 243 A.D. 530
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Application of William McGovern, Respondent, for a Mandamus Order against Theodore Toplitz and Others, as Commissioners of Civil Service of the City of Long Beach, and Others, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 243
Pages: 530–530

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Application of William McGovern, Respondent, for a Mandamus Order against Theodore Toplitz and Others, as Commissioners of Civil Service of the City of Long Beach, and Others, Appellants.

Opinion:
Application by petitioner for a mandamus order directing respondents to reinstate him in his position as foreman in the water department of the city of Long Beach. On the trial of an alternative mandamus order the questions of fact were determined in favor of petitioner. Appellants claim that he is barred by laches from the relief to wMch he would otherwise be entitled. Peremptory mandamus order unanimously affirmed, with costs, as a matter of law and not in the exercise of discretion. No opimon. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.