Case Name: Ruth OLASCOAGA, a minor, by and through her Next Friend, Ismael OLASCOAGA, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Jams Lee BILDERBACK, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2011-06-07
Citations: 352 S.W.3d 367
Docket Number: No. ED 95081
Parties: Ruth OLASCOAGA, a minor, by and through her Next Friend, Ismael OLASCOAGA, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Jams Lee BILDERBACK, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 352
Pages: 367–368

Head Matter:
Ruth OLASCOAGA, a minor, by and through her Next Friend, Ismael OLASCOAGA, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Jams Lee BILDERBACK, Defendant/Respondent.
No. ED 95081.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
June 7, 2011.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 20, 2011.
John H. Marshall, Jennifer Suttmoeller, Leonard P. Cervantes, St. Louis, MO, For Plaintiff/Appellant.
Jeffrey K. Suess, Heather J. Hayes, St. Louis, MO, For Defendant/Respondent.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Ruth Olascoaga, a minor, by and through her Next Friend, Ismael Olascoa-ga, appeals from the trial court's judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of Janis Lee Bilderback in an automobile-pedestrian collision case. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not err in submitting its verdict director. Boggs ex rel. Boggs v. Lay, 164 S.W.3d 4, 20 (Mo.App.E.D.2005). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).