Case Name: Jerry C. PULLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jim RUBENSTEIN, Commissioner; Thomas McBride, Warden; Michael Coleman, Deputy Warden; Patricia Hanshaw, Mailroom Supervisor; Stacy Thomas, Inmate Accounts Trustee; Rita Dunlap, Trustee Clerk; Sheila Hosey, Law Librarian, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-08-03
Citations: 103 F. App'x 755
Docket Number: No. 03-7530
Parties: Jerry C. PULLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jim RUBENSTEIN, Commissioner; Thomas McBride, Warden; Michael Coleman, Deputy Warden; Patricia Hanshaw, Mailroom Supervisor; Sta cy Thomas, Inmate Accounts Trustee; Rita Dunlap, Trustee Clerk; Sheila Hosey, Law Librarian, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 103
Pages: 755–756

Head Matter:
Jerry C. PULLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jim RUBENSTEIN, Commissioner; Thomas McBride, Warden; Michael Coleman, Deputy Warden; Patricia Hanshaw, Mailroom Supervisor; Sta cy Thomas, Inmate Accounts Trustee; Rita Dunlap, Trustee Clerk; Sheila Hosey, Law Librarian, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 03-7530.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 29, 2004.
Decided: Aug. 3, 2004.
Jerry C. Pulley, Appellant pro se.
Charles Patrick Houdyschell, Jr., West Virginia Division of Corrections, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Jerry C. Pulley appeals the district court's order accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000), based on Pulley's failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Pulley also appeals the magistrate judge's orders denying his motions to amend the complaint and for the appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court, see Pulley v. Rubenstein, No. CA-02-1217-5 (S.D.W.Va. Feb. 17, 2004), and by the magistrate judge, see id. (Dec. 10, 2002; Mar. 10, 2003; Aug. 12, 2003). We deny Pulley's motion for the appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED