Case Name: Barbara HUSS; Rodney Huss, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. John Overton GAYDEN, M.D.; Memphis Obstetrics and Gynecological Association PC, Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-10-14
Citations: 585 F.3d 823
Docket Number: No. 04-60962
Parties: Barbara HUSS; Rodney Huss, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. John Overton GAYDEN, M.D.; Memphis Obstetrics and Gynecological Association PC, Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 585
Pages: 823–833

Head Matter:
Barbara HUSS; Rodney Huss, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. John Overton GAYDEN, M.D.; Memphis Obstetrics and Gynecological Association PC, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 04-60962.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Oct. 14, 2009.
As Revised Oct. 15, 2009.
Ralph E. Chapman, Chapman, Lewis & Swan, Clarksdale, MS, John H. Daniels, III, Dyer, Dyer, Jones & Daniels, Green-ville, MS, Jane Horne Myers Virden, Chapman, Lewis & Swan, Madison, MS, for Barbara and Rodney Huss.
Mark Priestly Caraway, Meta S. Copeland, Wise, Carter, Child & Caraway, Jackson, MS, for Defendants-Appellants.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion June 10, 2009, 5th Cir., 571 F.3d 442)
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Petition for Panel Rehearing is DENIED. Judge Higginbotham dissents from the panel's denial of rehearing.
The court was polled at the request of one of the members of the court. A majority of the judges who are in regular active service and not disqualified not having voted in favor of rehearing en banc (Fed. R.App. P. 35 and 5th Cir. R. 35), the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is likewise DENIED. Judge Higginbotham and Judge Elrod have authored dissenting opinions, which are attached. Upon the filing of this order, the clerk shall issue the mandate forthwith. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b).