Case Name: Alice R. Taft, as executrix, &c., respondent, v. Mary Bely et al., appellants
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1924-10-20
Citations: 96 N.J. Eq. 673
Docket Number: 
Parties: Alice R. Taft, as executrix, &c., respondent, v. Mary Bely et al., appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 96
Pages: 673–673

Head Matter:
Alice R. Taft, as executrix, &c., respondent, v. Mary Bely et al., appellants.
[Decided October 20th, 1924.]
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Griffin, whose opinion is reported in 96 N. J. Eq. im.
Messrs. Benny & Gruden, for the respondent.
Mr. Aaron A. Melnik er, for the appellant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Griffin.
For affirmance — Kalisch, Katzehbach, Campbell, White, Vah Buskirk, Clark, McGlekkoh—7.
For reversal—The Chief-Justice, Trestchard, Parker. Mikturk, Black, Llotd, Eats—7.