Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Randall Lee CONRAD, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-08-22
Citations: 668 F. App'x 53
Docket Number: No. 16-6264
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Randall Lee CONRAD, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 668
Pages: 53–53

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Randall Lee CONRAD, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-6264
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: August 18, 2016
Decided: August 22, 2016
Randall Lee Conrad, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Randall Lee Conrad appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Conrad, No. 1:04-cr-00297-NCT-1 (M.D.N.C. filed Jan. 11 & entered Jan. 12, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED