Case Name: SENICK v. UNITED STATES
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1921-02-17
Citations: 271 F. 918
Docket Number: No. 1862
Parties: SENICK v. UNITED STATES.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter
Volume: 271
Pages: 918–918

Head Matter:
SENICK v. UNITED STATES.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
February 17, 1921.)
No. 1862.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond; Edmund Waddill, Jr., Judge.
Frank Senick was convicted of violating Harrison Narcotic Act, § 1, as amended by Revenue Act 1918, § 1006 (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, § 6287g), and he brings error.
Affirmed.
R. T. Thorp and J. L. Broudy, both of Norfolk, Va., for plaintiff in error.
Hiram M. Smith, Sp. Asst. U. S. Atty., of Richmond, Va.
Before KNAPP and WOODS, Circuit Judges, and ROSE, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In so far as the questions which the plaintiff in error seeks here to raise are of substance, they have been answered adversely to his contentions by our opinion in Pierriero v. United States, 271 Fed. 912, handed down at this term.
Affirmed-