Case Name: ROBERT H. WILLIAMS, RESPONDENT, v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1922-06-19
Citations: 97 N.J.L. 585
Docket Number: 
Parties: ROBERT H. WILLIAMS, RESPONDENT, v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 97
Pages: 585–585

Head Matter:
ROBERT H. WILLIAMS, RESPONDENT, v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT.
Submitted April 13, 1922
Decided June 19, 1922.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 96 N. J. L. 350.
For the respondent, Alexander Simpson.
For the appellant, Wall, Haight, Carey & Hartpence.

Opinion:
Pee Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Swayze, Parker, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheiwer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 12.
For reversal — Kone.