Case Name: State of Nebraska, ex rel. Frank Shaffer, v. Henry E. Bowman et al.
Court: Nebraska Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Nebraska
Decision Date: 1895-09-17
Citations: 45 Neb. 752
Docket Number: No. 4160
Parties: State of Nebraska, ex rel. Frank Shaffer, v. Henry E. Bowman et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Nebraska Reports
Volume: 45
Pages: 752–753

Head Matter:
State of Nebraska, ex rel. Frank Shaffer, v. Henry E. Bowman et al.
Filed September 17, 1895.
No. 4160.
Mandamus. A writ of mandamus will issue only when the right to require the performance of the desired act is clear.
Original application for mandamus.
Writ denied.
William Leese and F. B. Beall, for relator.
C. C. Flansburg and J. G. Thompson, contra.

Opinion:
Ryan, C.
This application for a mandamus was filed April 8,1890. The relator in his petition alleged that the city of Alma in the year 1890 was a city of the second class, containing more than one thousand inhabitants; that said city was made up of three wards; that on the-first Tuesday of April, 1890, the relator was a candidate for the office of councilman of the first ward and received the same number of votes as did the candidate opposing him; and that the respondents, who were judges of the election in the said ward, had duly delivered to the city clerk of Alma the ballots cast and poll books used in said first ward election without having previously determined by ballot which candidate should serve as councilman from the first ward. The prayer was for a writ of mandamus requiring the respondents to assemble forthwith and determine the aforesaid tie vote by ballot and certify the result to the city clerk and council of said city. By their answer filed October 2,1891, the respondents alleged that they had never been requested to determine the said tie vote until the poll books and ballots had passed out of the hands of themselves as election judges. We have been cited to no statute which in terms makes provision for the above' contingency. Section 45, ohapter 26, Compiled Statutes, provides that where the tie is between two persons, who are candidates for a township office the clerk shall notify both to appear at his office at a given time to determine the same by lot before the board and that the certificate of election shall be given accordingly. If the above proceedings prescribed by the chapter entitled "Elections" are by analogy to be deemed applicable to elections in cities of the class to which Alma belongs, as probably they should be, the petition should have stated that the city clerk had taken the step above indicated before a decision could be required by lot, and, even then, the general powers of the judges of election would not so nearly correspond to those of the board as would the powers of the city council. The writ is denied.
Writ denied.