Case Name: Jessie WILCOX, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1994-10-19
Citations: 643 So. 2d 129
Docket Number: No. 94-777
Parties: Jessie WILCOX, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and LEVY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 643
Pages: 129–130

Head Matter:
Jessie WILCOX, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 94-777.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 19, 1994.
Honey Hartman, Miami, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Consuelo Maingot, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and LEVY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The trial judge's conclusion, rendered after the evidentiary hearing required by Wilcox v. State, 622 So.2d 132 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993), that the appellant's trial counsel was not ineffective with respect to the decision for him not to testify, is supported by the record and is therefore affirmed. We reject Wilcox's argument that the hearing should have encompassed an additional claim that counsel failed to preserve an issue concerning the prosecutor's final argument because, on the face of the 3.850 motion itself, the point is without merit.
Affirmed.