Case Name: In re: Richard E. SNYDER; In re: Marion B. Snyder, Debtors. Richard E. Snyder; Marion B. Snyder, Appellants, v. EMC Mortgage Corporation, Appellee; In re: Richard E. Snyder; In re: Marion B. Snyder, Debtors. Richard E. Snyder; Marion B. Snyder, Appellants, v. Ellen W. Cosby, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-03-11
Citations: 123 F. App'x 112
Docket Number: No. 04-2308, 04-2309
Parties: In re: Richard E. SNYDER; In re: Marion B. Snyder, Debtors. Richard E. Snyder; Marion B. Snyder, Appellants, v. EMC Mortgage Corporation, Appellee. In re: Richard E. Snyder; In re: Marion B. Snyder, Debtors. Richard E. Snyder; Marion B. Snyder, Appellants, v. Ellen W. Cosby, Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Bankruptcy Reporter
Volume: 325
Pages: 112–113

Head Matter:
In re: Richard E. SNYDER; In re: Marion B. Snyder, Debtors. Richard E. Snyder; Marion B. Snyder, Appellants, v. EMC Mortgage Corporation, Appellee. In re: Richard E. Snyder; In re: Marion B. Snyder, Debtors. Richard E. Snyder; Marion B. Snyder, Appellants, v. Ellen W. Cosby, Appellee.
No. 04-2308, 04-2309.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 23, 2005.
Decided March 11, 2005.
Richard E. Snyder, Marion B. Snyder, Appellants pro se. R. Martin Caskey, Law Offices of Martin Caskey, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM.
In these consolidated appeals, Richard E. Snyder and Marion B. Snyder appeal the district court's order affirming the decisions of the bankruptcy court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Snyder v. EMC Mortgage Corp., Nos. CA-03-1840-1-BEL; CA-03-1841-1-BEL (D.Md. Sept. 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED