Case Name: Joseph Edward EVANS, Appellant, v. Robert F. KENNEDY, Individually and as Attorney General of the United States, J. Edgar Hoover, Individually and as Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, James W. Kelly, Jr., Individually and as Mayor of East Orange, New Jersey, and Hugh Addonizio, Individually and as Mayor of Newark, New Jersey
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1966-05-19
Citations: 359 F.2d 856
Docket Number: No. 15728
Parties: Joseph Edward EVANS, Appellant, v. Robert F. KENNEDY, Individually and as Attorney General of the United States, J. Edgar Hoover, Individually and as Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, James W. Kelly, Jr., Individually and as Mayor of East Orange, New Jersey, and Hugh Addonizio, Individually and as Mayor of Newark, New Jersey.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 359
Pages: 856–857

Head Matter:
Joseph Edward EVANS, Appellant, v. Robert F. KENNEDY, Individually and as Attorney General of the United States, J. Edgar Hoover, Individually and as Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, James W. Kelly, Jr., Individually and as Mayor of East Orange, New Jersey, and Hugh Addonizio, Individually and as Mayor of Newark, New Jersey.
No. 15728.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Submitted May 5, 1966.
Decided May 19, 1966.
Joseph Edward Evans, pro se.
Norman E. Schull, Asst. City Counsel, East Orange, N. J., for James W. Kelly, Jr.
Matthew J. Scola, Asst. U. S. Atty., Newark, N. J. (David M. Satz, Jr., U. S. Atty., Newark, N. J., on the brief), for Robert F. Kennedy and J. Edgar Hoover.
William H. Walls, Asst. Corporation Counsel, Newark, N. J. (Norman N. Schiff, Corporation Counsel, City of Newark, Newark, N. J., on the brief), for Hugh Addonizio.
Before STALEY, Chief Judge, and KALODNER and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This appeal was fixed for argument before this court on May 5, 1966. Proper notice was given to the appellant of the date and time for argument. At the appointed time, the appellees appeared by their attorneys; appellant failed to so appear. The court thereupon inquired of the attorneys for the appellees whether they were willing to submit the case on briefs. They agreed to this.
The court has carefully examined the briefs of the parties and the record in the district court. It can find no error.
The order of the district court will be affirmed.