Case Name: U.S. SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Miles LEVITES, individually and as natural guardian of Jennifer Levites, a minor, Hazel Levites, individually and as natural guardian of Jennifer Levites, a minor, Jeffrey Kessler, as natural guardian and parent of Zachary Kessler, Katherine Reich, as natural guardian and parent of Jerome Hughes, Derone Haller, and Richard Haller, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-08-11
Citations: 625 So. 2d 1232
Docket Number: Nos. 92-2135, 92-2861
Parties: U.S. SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Miles LEVITES, individually and as natural guardian of Jennifer Levites, a minor, Hazel Levites, individually and as natural guardian of Jennifer Levites, a minor, Jeffrey Kessler, as natural guardian and parent of Zachary Kessler, Katherine Reich, as natural guardian and parent of Jerome Hughes, Derone Haller, and Richard Haller, Appellees.
Judges: ANSTEAD and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., and BIRKEN, ARTHUR M., Associate Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 625
Pages: 1232–1233

Head Matter:
U.S. SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Miles LEVITES, individually and as natural guardian of Jennifer Levites, a minor, Hazel Levites, individually and as natural guardian of Jennifer Levites, a minor, Jeffrey Kessler, as natural guardian and parent of Zachary Kessler, Katherine Reich, as natural guardian and parent of Jerome Hughes, Derone Haller, and Richard Haller, Appellees.
Nos. 92-2135, 92-2861.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Aug. 11, 1993.
Opinion Clarifying on Rehearing Oct. 20, 1993.
Betsey E. Gallagher and Gail Leverett of Kubicki, Draper, Gallagher & McGrane, P.A., Miami, for appellant.
Joseph S. Kashi of Sperry, Shapiro & Ka-shi, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellees-Lev-ites.
Richard A. Kupfer of Richard A. Kupfer, P.A., and Allen E. Rossin of Cone and Cone, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellees-Lev-ites.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the summary final judgment on the authority of Abrams v. General Insurance Co., Inc., 508 So.2d 436 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in summarily deciding that the appellee-insureds did not make a material misrepresentation in their application for insurance by failing to disclose that their teenage daughter would be driving one of the insured vehicles. Based upon the conflicting evidence in the record before us, we conclude that there is a disputed issue of fact as to the alleged misrepresentation that cannot be properly resolved by summary judgment.
Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings in accord herewith.
ANSTEAD and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., and BIRKEN, ARTHUR M., Associate Judge, concur.