Case Name: WORKS COUNCIL (BETRIEBSVER-TRETUNG) 86 CEG; Fritz Frank; Bernd Guckenbiehl; Manfred Kraus; Kurt Matheis; Horst-Walter Neu; Wolfgang Siegfried; Karl-Heinz Stass; R&W Flammann GMBH, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE; Dr. James G. Roche, Secretary of the Air Force, Defendants-Appellees, and World Service Alliance, GMBH, Intervenor/Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-10-08
Citations: 77 F. App'x 176
Docket Number: No. 00-1123
Parties: WORKS COUNCIL (BETRIEBSVER-TRETUNG) 86 CEG; Fritz Frank; Bernd Guckenbiehl; Manfred Kraus; Kurt Matheis; Horst-Walter Neu; Wolfgang Siegfried; Karl-Heinz Stass; R&W Flammann GMBH, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE; Dr. James G. Roche, Secretary of the Air Force, Defendants-Appellees, and World Service Alliance, GMBH, Intervenor/Defendant.
Judges: Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 77
Pages: 176–177

Head Matter:
WORKS COUNCIL (BETRIEBSVER-TRETUNG) 86 CEG; Fritz Frank; Bernd Guckenbiehl; Manfred Kraus; Kurt Matheis; Horst-Walter Neu; Wolfgang Siegfried; Karl-Heinz Stass; R&W Flammann GMBH, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE; Dr. James G. Roche, Secretary of the Air Force, Defendants-Appellees, and World Service Alliance, GMBH, Intervenor/Defendant.
No. 00-1123.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Argued Sept. 23, 2003.
Decided Oct. 8, 2003.
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have considered the record and the briefs and, upon oral argument, are of opinion there is no reversible error in this case.
The judgment of the district court is accordingly
AFFIRMED.