Case Name: James W. ATKINS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1986-01-28
Citations: 481 So. 2d 1300
Docket Number: No. 86-68
Parties: James W. ATKINS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before BASKIN, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 481
Pages: 1300–1300

Head Matter:
James W. ATKINS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 86-68.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan. 28, 1986.
James W. Atkins, in pro. per.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before BASKIN, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
DANIEL S. PEARSON, Judge.
The trial judge's disposition of the defendant's Rule 3.850 motion is a model that is too rarely seen: he has attached to his order denying relief the plea agreement and plea colloquy which, taken together, conclusively show that the defendant's claim that he was promised six years imprisonment and received twenty-two years instead is totally without merit.
Affirmed.