Case Name: Freehold Investments, Appellant, v. Geoffrey Richstone, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1974-03-21
Citations: 34 N.Y.2d 612
Docket Number: 
Parties: Freehold Investments, Appellant, v. Geoffrey Richstone, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 34
Pages: 612–613

Head Matter:
Freehold Investments, Appellant, v. Geoffrey Richstone, Respondent.
Argued February 13, 1974;
decided March 21, 1974.
Ralph H. Wiener for appellant.
Robert P. Baron for respondent.

Opinion:
Order reversed, without costs, and the order of the Appellate Term reinstated in the following memorandum: The evidence persuasively demonstrates, as a matter of law, that the alterations were sufficiently substantial to constitute a significant injury to the reversion, entitling appellant landlord to possession of the premises.
Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Rabin. Taking no part: Judge Stevens.