Case Name: Alex M. Hamburg, Respondent, v. Archibald Douglas and Others, Individually, and Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Douglas, Armitage & Holloway, and G. R. Kinney Co., Inc., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1942-05-11
Citations: 264 A.D. 777
Docket Number: 
Parties: Alex M. Hamburg, Respondent, v. Archibald Douglas and Others, Individually, and Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Douglas, Armitage & Holloway, and G. R. Kinney Co., Inc., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 264
Pages: 777–777

Head Matter:
Alex M. Hamburg, Respondent, v. Archibald Douglas and Others, Individually, and Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Douglas, Armitage & Holloway, and G. R. Kinney Co., Inc., Appellants.

Opinion:
Action to recover damages from defendants for their alleged malicious interference with contracts which plaintiff had with certain third persons. Order denying defendants' motion to require plaintiff further to amend his complaint by joining others as parties defendant, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.