Case Name: Michelle R. WISE, et al., Respondents/Plaintiffs. v. Austin L. MITCHELL, Appellant/Defendant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-02-06
Citations: 39 S.W.3d 531
Docket Number: No. ED 77322
Parties: Michelle R. WISE, et al., Respondents/Plaintiffs. v. Austin L. MITCHELL, Appellant/Defendant,
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J., CRAHAN, J., and DRAPER, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 39
Pages: 531–531

Head Matter:
Michelle R. WISE, et al., Respondents/Plaintiffs. v. Austin L. MITCHELL, Appellant/Defendant,
No. ED 77322.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Feb. 6, 2001.
Rehearing Denied March 19, 2001.
Edgar E. Lim, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Steven W. Edwards, Clayton, MO, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J., CRAHAN, J., and DRAPER, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant Austin Mitchell appeals the judgment sustaining Respondents Michelle and Mary Wise's motion to impose sanctions, strike pleadings, and grant summary judgment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law which would warrant reversal. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum, for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).