Case Name: In re RED FROG EVENTS, LLC, Relator
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 2013-01-14
Citations: 391 S.W.3d 341
Docket Number: No. 05-13-00037-CV
Parties: In re RED FROG EVENTS, LLC, Relator.
Judges: Before Justices MOSELEY, FRANCIS and Fillmore.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 391
Pages: 341–342

Head Matter:
In re RED FROG EVENTS, LLC, Relator.
No. 05-13-00037-CV.
Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.
Jan. 14, 2013.
Ben Martin, John Robert Howie, Jr., Dallas, TX, for appellant.
Monroe Gaddy Wells, Jay R. Downs, Dallas, TX, for appellee.
Before Justices MOSELEY, FRANCIS and Fillmore.

Opinion:
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice FILLMORE.
In this original mandamus proceeding, relator contends the trial court abused its discretion by compelling relator to produce documents relator asserts are irrelevant, overbroad, and not reasonably calculated to lead to admissible evidence. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion by compelling production of the documents. See Tex.R.App. P. 52.8(a); In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex.2004) (orig. proceeding); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex.1992) (orig. proceeding).
We DENY relator's petition for writ of mandamus.