Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. De'Juan Anderko WATKINS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-10-06
Citations: 397 F. App'x 853
Docket Number: No. 10-7039
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. De’Juan Anderko WATKINS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 397
Pages: 853–854

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. De’Juan Anderko WATKINS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-7039.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 28, 2010.
Decided: Oct. 6, 2010.
De’Juan Anderko Watkins, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Gordon James, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
De'Juan Anderko Watkins appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a writ of audita querela. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Watkins, No. 7:02-cr-00106-F-1 (E.D.N.C. July 12, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.