Case Name: HAROLD CALIGUIRE, AS ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM FOR THE ESTATE OF VINCENT CALIGUIRE AND HAROLD CALIGUIRE, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CITY OF UNION CITY IN THE COUNTY OF HUDSON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1969-02-03
Citations: 53 N.J. 182
Docket Number: 
Parties: HAROLD CALIGUIRE, AS ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM FOR THE ESTATE OF VINCENT CALIGUIRE AND HAROLD CALIGUIRE, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CITY OF UNION CITY IN THE COUNTY OF HUDSON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 53
Pages: 182–182

Head Matter:
HAROLD CALIGUIRE, AS ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM FOR THE ESTATE OF VINCENT CALIGUIRE AND HAROLD CALIGUIRE, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CITY OF UNION CITY IN THE COUNTY OF HUDSON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Argued January 20, 1969
Decided February 3, 1969.
Mr. Robert J. Garluccio argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant.
Mr. Robert J. Wall argued the cause for defendant-respondent {Mr. Thomas J. Kilcoyne, on the brief).

Opinion:
The opinion of the court was delivered
Per Curiam.
The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed for the reasons given in the majority opinion 101 N. J. Super. 210 {App. Div. 1967).
For affirmance—Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctor, Hall and Haneman—6.
For reversal—None.