Case Name: Michael A. MUSTO, Appellant, v. BELL SOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, a Georgia corporation, and Recovery Specialists, Inc., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1999-09-29
Citations: 741 So. 2d 637
Docket Number: No. 98-1729
Parties: Michael A. MUSTO, Appellant, v. BELL SOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, a Georgia corporation, and Recovery Specialists, Inc., Appellees.
Judges: DELL, POLEN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 741
Pages: 637–638

Head Matter:
Michael A. MUSTO, Appellant, v. BELL SOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, a Georgia corporation, and Recovery Specialists, Inc., Appellees.
No. 98-1729.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Sept. 29, 1999.
Donald P. Kohl of Donald P. Kohl, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Michele L. McNichol of Katz, Barron, Squitero, Faust & Berman, P.A., Miami, for appellees.

Opinion:
ON APPELLEES' MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION
PER CURIAM.
We grant appellees' motion for certification and certify the following question to be of great public importance:
IN DETERMINING WHEN THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS BEGINS TO RUN ON THE COMMON LAW TORT OF CREDIT SLANDER, SHOULD COURTS APPLY THE "SINGLE PUBLICATION RULE" AT ISSUE IN WAGNER, NUGENT, JOHNSON, ROTH, ROMANO, ERIK- SON & KUPFER, P.A. v. FLANAGAN, 629 So.2d 113 (Fla.1993), OR THE "MULTIPLE PUBLICATION RULE?"
DELL, POLEN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.