Case Name: Michael SAUNCHEGRAW, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Julie SAUNCHEGRAW, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-04-09
Citations: 77 S.W.3d 644
Docket Number: No. ED 79365
Parties: Michael SAUNCHEGRAW, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Julie SAUNCHEGRAW, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before GEORGE W. DRAPER III, P.J. and MARY R. RUSSELL, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 77
Pages: 644–645

Head Matter:
Michael SAUNCHEGRAW, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Julie SAUNCHEGRAW, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 79365.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
April 9, 2002.
Cordell & Cordell, P.C., Scott C. Trout, Michael P. Cohan, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Carmody MacDonald, John E. Hilton, Joyce M. Capshaw, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before GEORGE W. DRAPER III, P.J. and MARY R. RUSSELL, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Michael Saunchegraw (Husband) appeals from the trial court's dissolution of marriage judgment awarding maintenance to Julie Saunchegraw (Wife) and regarding the division of marital property. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).