Case Name: Maria Lurdes PEREIRA, Appellant v. CITIBANK, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-09-16
Citations: 433 F. App'x 3
Docket Number: No. 11-7025
Parties: Maria Lurdes PEREIRA, Appellant v. CITIBANK, Appellee.
Judges: BEFORE: SENTELLE, Chief Judge, and TATEL and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 433
Pages: 3–4

Head Matter:
Maria Lurdes PEREIRA, Appellant v. CITIBANK, Appellee.
No. 11-7025.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Sept. 16, 2011.
Maria Lurdes Pereira, Washington, DC, pro se.
BEFORE: SENTELLE, Chief Judge, and TATEL and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief and appendix filed by the appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's order filed March 18, 2011, be affirmed. The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing appellant's complaint without prejudice for failure to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a), which requires "a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief." See Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C.Cir.2004).
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.