Case Name: Donald A. CROSSLIN, et ux., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Stanford B. WHATLEY d/b/a Fantasia No. 2, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1976-12-06
Citations: 340 So. 2d 648
Docket Number: No. 13067
Parties: Donald A. CROSSLIN, et ux., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Stanford B. WHATLEY d/b/a Fantasia No. 2, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before BOLIN, PRICE and MARVIN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 340
Pages: 648–649

Head Matter:
Donald A. CROSSLIN, et ux., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Stanford B. WHATLEY d/b/a Fantasia No. 2, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13067.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.
Dec. 6, 1976.
En Banc. Rehearing Denied Jan. 10, 1977.
Hamilton & Sermons by Joel M. Sermons, Shreveport, for defendant-appellant.
Lewis Weinstein, Richard C. Goorley, Shreveport, for plaintiff-appellee.
Before BOLIN, PRICE and MARVIN, JJ.

Opinion:
BOLIN, Judge.
Judy Crosslin was stopped and searched when her departure from defendant's clothing store activated a shoplifting warning device. The trial court held the search was unreasonable and awarded plaintiff $350 damages. Defendant appeals and we affirm.
The facts of this case are identical to those in Smith et ux. v. Whatley d/b/a Fantasia No. 2, 338 So.2d 153 (La.App. 2nd Cir., 1976). Plaintiff in that case was accompanied by plaintiff in this case when they were both stopped and searched by employees of defendant. It was stipulated that the testimony in this case would be the same as in Smith and a copy of that transcript of testimony is filed in this record.
For the reasons assigned in Smith v. Whatley, the judgment is affirmed at appellant's cost.