Case Name: Janice Wolk GRENADIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BWW LAW GROUP, LLC, f/k/a Bierman, Geesing, Ward & Wood, LLC; Howard N. Bierman; Equity Trustees, LLC; Mark R. Galbraith; Wells Fargo; Bank of America, f/k/a LaSalle Bank N.A., as successor-in-interest, Jointly and Severally, in their Official and Personal Capacities; Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, Jointly and Severally, in their Official and Personal Capacities, Defendants-Appellees; Janice Wolk Grenadier, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BWW Law Group, LLC, f/k/a Bierman, Geesing, Ward & Wood, LLC; Howard N. Bierman; Equity Trustees, LLC; Mark R. Galbraith; Wells Fargo; Bank of America, f/k/a LaSalle Bank N.A., as successor-in-interest, Jointly and Severally, in their Official and Personal Capacities; Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, Jointly and Severally, in their Official and Personal Capacities, Defendants-Appellees, and Bank of America, f/k/a LaSalle Bank N.A., Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-09-13
Citations: 668 F. App'x 502
Docket Number: No. 16-1048, No. 16-1088
Parties: Janice Wolk GRENADIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BWW LAW GROUP, LLC, f/k/a Bierman, Geesing, Ward & Wood, LLC; Howard N. Bierman; Equity Trustees, LLC; Mark R. Galbraith; Wells Fargo; Bank of America, f/k/a LaSalle Bank N.A., as successor-in-interest, Jointly and Severally, in their Official and Personal Capacities; Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, Jointly and Severally, in their Official and Personal Capacities, Defendants-Appellees. Janice Wolk Grenadier, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BWW Law Group, LLC, f/k/a Bierman, Geesing, Ward & Wood, LLC; Howard N. Bierman; Equity Trustees, LLC; Mark R. Galbraith; Wells Fargo; Bank of America, f/k/a LaSalle Bank N.A., as successor-in-interest, Jointly and Severally, in their Official and Personal Capacities; Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, Jointly and Severally, in their Official and Personal Capacities, Defendants-Appellees, and Bank of America, f/k/a LaSalle Bank N.A., Defendant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 668
Pages: 502–503

Head Matter:
Janice Wolk GRENADIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BWW LAW GROUP, LLC, f/k/a Bierman, Geesing, Ward & Wood, LLC; Howard N. Bierman; Equity Trustees, LLC; Mark R. Galbraith; Wells Fargo; Bank of America, f/k/a LaSalle Bank N.A., as successor-in-interest, Jointly and Severally, in their Official and Personal Capacities; Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, Jointly and Severally, in their Official and Personal Capacities, Defendants-Appellees. Janice Wolk Grenadier, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BWW Law Group, LLC, f/k/a Bierman, Geesing, Ward & Wood, LLC; Howard N. Bierman; Equity Trustees, LLC; Mark R. Galbraith; Wells Fargo; Bank of America, f/k/a LaSalle Bank N.A., as successor-in-interest, Jointly and Severally, in their Official and Personal Capacities; Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, Jointly and Severally, in their Official and Personal Capacities, Defendants-Appellees, and Bank of America, f/k/a LaSalle Bank N.A., Defendant.
No. 16-1048, No. 16-1088
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: August 31, 2016
Decided: September 13, 2016
Janice Wolk Grenadier, Appellant Pro Se. Syed Mohsin Reza, Mary Catherine Zinsner, TROUTMAN SANDERS, LLP, Tysons Corner, Virginia; Nathaniel Patrick Lee, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Tysons Corner, Virginia; Robert Ryan Michael, BWW LAW GROUP, LLC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Janice Wolk Grenadier appeals the district court's orders denying her motions for a writ of error and for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Grenadier v. BWW Law Group, LLC, No. 1:14-cv-00827-LMB-TCB, 2015 WL 11111067 (E.D. Va. Nov. 17, 2015; Dec. 23, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED