Case Name: Brenda Louise DYE, Appellant, v. Elliott Hoyt DYE, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-05-30
Citations: 18 S.W.3d 555
Docket Number: No. ED 76625
Parties: Brenda Louise DYE, Appellant, v. Elliott Hoyt DYE, Respondent.
Judges: Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 18
Pages: 555–556

Head Matter:
Brenda Louise DYE, Appellant, v. Elliott Hoyt DYE, Respondent.
No. ED 76625.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
May 30, 2000.
Aaron S. Dubin, Clayton, for appellant.
Elliott Hoyt Dye, Granite City, IL, pro se.
Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Brenda Louise Dye appeals the trial court's denial of her motion to modify the parties' decree of dissolution. We find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(1).