Case Name: GEE DEE ENTERPRISES, INC., a Corporation, Plaintiff v. RAMESH J. MELWANI, individually and DBA LIBERTY FASHIONS or LIBERTY FASHIONS AND SHOES, Defendants; GEE DEE ENTERPRISES, INC., a Corporation v. UNITED RESOURCES, INC., and LIBERTY SHOES, INC., Defendants
Court: Superior Court of Guam
Jurisdiction: Guam
Decision Date: 1976-12-14
Citations: 1 Guam 378
Docket Number: Civil No. 940-76; Civil No. 941-76
Parties: GEE DEE ENTERPRISES, INC., a Corporation, Plaintiff v. RAMESH J. MELWANI, individually and DBA LIBERTY FASHIONS or LIBERTY FASHIONS AND SHOES, Defendants GEE DEE ENTERPRISES, INC., a Corporation v. UNITED RESOURCES, INC., and LIBERTY SHOES, INC., Defendants
Judges: 
Reporter: Guam Reports
Volume: 1
Pages: 378–378

Head Matter:
GEE DEE ENTERPRISES, INC., a Corporation, Plaintiff v. RAMESH J. MELWANI, individually and DBA LIBERTY FASHIONS or LIBERTY FASHIONS AND SHOES, Defendants GEE DEE ENTERPRISES, INC., a Corporation v. UNITED RESOURCES, INC., and LIBERTY SHOES, INC., Defendants
Civil No. 940-76
Civil No. 941-76
Superior Court of Guam
December 14, 1976

Opinion:
BENSON, Judge
ORDER
This matter came before the court on motion of Liberty Shoes, and was submitted for decision after oral argument on December 10,1976.
The decision of the court is
1) That a 5-day summons is permissible in a case of unlawful detainer.
2) That proper notice to pay or to quit must be served before institution of an unlawful detainer action.
3) That an unlawful detainer cannot be maintained against one not in possession.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion to dismiss be granted as to defendant Liberty Shoes for reason No. 2 above, and also granted as to United Resources for reason No. 3 above.