Case Name: CARDELL, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY AND J. RICHARD HUDANICH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE TOWNSHIP OF MADISON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION IN THE COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND MANZO CONTRACTING CO., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1969-06-06
Citations: 54 N.J. 151
Docket Number: 
Parties: CARDELL, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY AND J. RICHARD HUDANICH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE TOWNSHIP OF MADISON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION IN THE COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND MANZO CONTRACTING CO., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 54
Pages: 151–152

Head Matter:
CARDELL, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY AND J. RICHARD HUDANICH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE TOWNSHIP OF MADISON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION IN THE COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND MANZO CONTRACTING CO., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Argued June 4, 1969
Decided June 6, 1969.
Mr. Stewart M. Mutt argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Mutt and Berkow, attorneys).
Mr. Marc J. Gordan and Mr. Mark L. Stanton argued the cause for respondents.

Opinion:
Pee Cueiam.
The judgment is reversed for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Labrecque in the Appellate Division.
For reversal — Chief Justice Weinteaub and Justices Jacobs, Feanois, Peoctoe, Hall, Schettino and HaneMAN-7.
For affirmance — None.