Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lemoyne VENEY, a/k/a Victor Demaris, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-06-29
Citations: 667 F. App'x 66
Docket Number: No. 16-6468
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lemoyne VENEY, a/k/a Victor Demaris, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 667
Pages: 66–66

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lemoyne VENEY, a/k/a Victor Demaris, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-6468
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 23, 2016
Decided: June 29, 2016
Lemoyne Veney, Appellant Pro Se. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Tamera Lynn Fine, Assistant United States Attorney, Paul Nitze, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding ' precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Lemoyne Veney seeks to appeal the district court's order denying several motions Veney filed in his pending 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) proceeding. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Veney seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED