Case Name: GUY T. KELLEY, IRENE R. KELLEY, LOUIS TERRANA, ROBERT H. BOYD, FRANK B. MONROE, NAN SMITH, THELMA STRAIGHT, AGNES THOMAS, HOMER CHARLES and MELVIN TUFFO, Appellants, v. WILLIAM RAGGIO, C. W. (BUD) YOUNG, TED BERRUM and ROBERT GALLI, Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada
Jurisdiction: Nevada
Decision Date: 1960-03-31
Citations: 76 Nev. 157
Docket Number: No. 4236
Parties: GUY T. KELLEY, IRENE R. KELLEY, LOUIS TERRANA, ROBERT H. BOYD, FRANK B. MONROE, NAN SMITH, THELMA STRAIGHT, AGNES THOMAS, HOMER CHARLES and MELVIN TUFFO, Appellants, v. WILLIAM RAGGIO, C. W. (BUD) YOUNG, TED BERRUM and ROBERT GALLI, Respondents.
Judges: Badt and Pike, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Nevada Reports
Volume: 76
Pages: 157–157

Head Matter:
GUY T. KELLEY, IRENE R. KELLEY, LOUIS TERRANA, ROBERT H. BOYD, FRANK B. MONROE, NAN SMITH, THELMA STRAIGHT, AGNES THOMAS, HOMER CHARLES and MELVIN TUFFO, Appellants, v. WILLIAM RAGGIO, C. W. (BUD) YOUNG, TED BERRUM and ROBERT GALLI, Respondents.
No. 4236
March 31, 1960
350 P.2d 724
Gray & Young, of Reno, for Appellants.
William J. Raggio, District Attorney, Washoe County, of Reno, for Respondents.
Roger D. Foley, Attorney General, and John A. Porter, Deputy Attorney General, Amici Curiae.

Opinion:
OPINION
By the Court,
McNamee, C. J.:
This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing a complaint to enjoin the enforcement of NRS 651.040 upon the ground of its unconstitutionality.
It is conceded that the identical principles of law presented herein were urged in the case of Viale v. Foley, No. 4235, 76 Nev. 149, 350 P.2d 721, the opinion in which has been handed down today. The decision in that case is determinative of the issues here involved.
Affirmed.
Badt and Pike, JJ., concur.