Case Name: TERRY D. McCLANAHAN, Appellant, v. Jean HILL, Superintendent, Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2005-05-25
Citations: 200 Or. App. 9
Docket Number: CV00-0145; A112913
Parties: TERRY D. McCLANAHAN, Appellant, v. Jean HILL, Superintendent, Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution, Respondent.
Judges: Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Linder and Ortega, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 200
Pages: 9–10

Head Matter:
Submitted on record and briefs April 1,
affirmed May 25,
petition for review denied October 20,2005 (339 Or 450)
TERRY D. McCLANAHAN, Appellant, v. Jean HILL, Superintendent, Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution, Respondent.
CV00-0145; A112913
112 P3d 456
Terry D. McClanahan filed the briefs pro se for petitioner.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Daniel J. Casey, Assistant Attorney General, filed the briefs for respondent.
Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Linder and Ortega, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Petitioner appeals from the post-conviction court's denial of his petition for post-conviction relief, making several arguments in his appellate brief. We reject those arguments without discussion. Petitioner also has filed a supplemental brief in which he asserts that the stipulated departure sentence on his conviction for first-degree manslaughter is unconstitutional under Blakely v. Washington, 542 US 296, 124 S Ct 2531, 159 L Ed 2d 403 (2004), and Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 US 466, 120 S Ct 2348, 147 L Ed 2d 435 (2000).
We reject petitioner's argument because the principles announced by the Court in Blakely and Apprendi do not apply retroactively in a collateral proceeding such as this one. Page v. Palmateer, 336 Or 379, 84 P3d 133, cert den, _US_, 125 S Ct 205 (2004); Makinson v. Lampert, 199 Or App 418, 112 P3d 365 (2005); see also Schriro v. Summerlin, 542 US 348, 124 S Ct 2519, 159 L Ed 2d 442 (2004) (jury trial right set forth in Apprendi does not apply retroactively in collateral proceedings).
Affirmed.