Case Name: William P. ROGERS, Attorney General of the United States, as Successor to the Alien Property Custodian v. SCHERING CORPORATION, a corporation of the State of New Jersey, Appellant. Hexagon Laboratories, Inc., a corporation of the State of New York, Intervenor
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1959-11-05
Citations: 271 F.2d 266
Docket Number: No. 12816
Parties: William P. ROGERS, Attorney General of the United States, as Successor to the Alien Property Custodian v. SCHERING CORPORATION, a corporation of the State of New Jersey, Appellant Hexagon Laboratories, Inc., a corporation of the State of New York, Intervenor.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 271
Pages: 266–266

Head Matter:
William P. ROGERS, Attorney General of the United States, as Successor to the Alien Property Custodian v. SCHERING CORPORATION, a corporation of the State of New Jersey, Appellant Hexagon Laboratories, Inc., a corporation of the State of New York, Intervenor.
No. 12816.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued Oct. 9, 1959.
Decided Nov. 5, 1959.
See also 3 Cir., 262 F.2d 180.
William D. Denson, New York City (Anthony T. Augelli, of Milton McNulty & Augelli, Jersey City, N. J., Irving H. Jurow, Bloomfield, N. J., George B. Finnegan, Jr., of Morgan, Finnegan, Durham & Pine, New York City, on the brief), for appellant.
Montrose H. Massler, New York City (Allan L. Tumarkin, Newark, N. J., Theodore R. Kupferman, New York City, on the brief), for intervenor-appellee.
Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and McLAUGHLIN and STALEY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have examined the lengthy record in this case and have weighed the arguments of the respective parties. We can perceive no error in the decision of the court below and we are of the view that we can add nothing of value to the succinct and careful opinion of Judge Forman. D.C.D.N.J.1958, 165 F.Supp. 295. Accordingly the judgment will be affirmed on his opinion.