Case Name: ARTHUR L. KUGEL, RESPONDENT, v. CHARLES M. RIEDELL, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1932-05-16
Citations: 109 N.J.L. 268
Docket Number: 
Parties: ARTHUR L. KUGEL, RESPONDENT, v. CHARLES M. RIEDELL, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 109
Pages: 268–269

Head Matter:
ARTHUR L. KUGEL, RESPONDENT, v. CHARLES M. RIEDELL, APPELLANT.
Submitted October 30, 1931 —
Decided May 16, 1932.
For the respondent, Milton M. Unger.
For the appellant, Harrison & Roche.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — -Pabkee, Campbell, Case, Bodine, Donges, Yan Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.