Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Ryan Orph BOULWARE, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2016-06-28
Citations: 492 S.W.3d 667
Docket Number: WD 78401
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Ryan Orph BOULWARE, Appellant.
Judges: Before Division Two: Victor C. Howard, Presiding Judge, Thomas H. Newton, Judge and Karen King Mitchell, Judge
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 492
Pages: 667–667

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Ryan Orph BOULWARE, Appellant.
WD 78401
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Order filed: June 28, 2016
Christine K. Lesicko, for Respondent.
Samuel E. Buffalo, for Appellant.
Before Division Two: Victor C. Howard, Presiding Judge, Thomas H. Newton, Judge and Karen King Mitchell, Judge

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Ryan Boulware appeals the judgment of convictions and sentences for driving while revoked and resisting arrest. He argues that the trial court abused its discretion in allowing a law enforcement officer to testify that the treads on Boulware's .shoes shared characteristics with the shoeprint he found, in allowing another officer to testify about visits he made to Boulware's residence earlier during the month of Boulware's .crimes, and for overruling Boulware's motion for judgment of acquittal. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, the parties have been provided a memorandum.
The- judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).