Case Name: JOSEPH BARON ET UX versus ROBERT A. FORSYTH, JOHN PATTERSON, AND CHARLES LABADIE, ALEXIS LABADIE, FRANÇOIS LABADY, ANTOINE LABADIE, ARCHANGE JONES, WILLIAM JONES, MONIQUE CADOTTE, FRANÇOIS CADOTTE, CECILE LeDUC AND LOUIS LeDUC, HEIRS OF ALEXIS LABADIE, DECEASED
Court: Michigan Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Michigan
Decision Date: 1824
Citations: 3 Blume Sup. Ct. Trans. 326
Docket Number: 
Parties: JOSEPH BARON ET UX versus ROBERT A. FORSYTH, JOHN PATTERSON, AND CHARLES LABADIE, ALEXIS LABADIE, FRANÇOIS LABADY, ANTOINE LABADIE, ARCHANGE JONES, WILLIAM JONES, MONIQUE CADOTTE, FRANÇOIS CADOTTE, CECILE LeDUC AND LOUIS LeDUC, HEIRS OF ALEXIS LABADIE, DECEASED
Judges: 
Reporter: Transactions of the Supreme Court of the territory of Michigan
Volume: 3
Pages: 326–326

Head Matter:
JOSEPH BARON ET UX versus ROBERT A. FORSYTH, JOHN PATTERSON, AND CHARLES LABADIE, ALEXIS LABADIE, FRANÇOIS LABADY, ANTOINE LABADIE, ARCHANGE JONES, WILLIAM JONES, MONIQUE CADOTTE, FRANÇOIS CADOTTE, CECILE LeDUC AND LOUIS LeDUC, HEIRS OF ALEXIS LABADIE, DECEASED

Opinion:
Journal Entries (1824-26): Journal3: (1) Motion for decree pro confesso *p. 509. Journal 4: (2) Motion to take bill as confessed, continued MS p. 72; (3) death suggested, bill dismissed MS p. 105.
Papers in File: (i) Bill of complaint and two affidavits, allowance of injunction; (2) recognizance; (3) precipe for writ of subpoena and for writ of injunction; (4) writ of injunction and return; (5) writ of subpoena and return.
Chancery Case 34 of 1823.