Case Name: HOFFMANN, Plaintiff, and ROTH, Appellant, v. STOLL et al, Respondents
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1988-01-13
Citations: 89 Or. App. 258
Docket Number: 8611-07067; CA A44238
Parties: HOFFMANN, Plaintiff, and ROTH, Appellant, v. STOLL et al, Respondents.
Judges: Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Newman and Deits, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 89
Pages: 258–259

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted December 16, 1987,
affirmed January 13,
reconsideration denied March 25,
petition for review allowed April 19, 1988 (305 Or 576)
HOFFMANN, Plaintiff, and ROTH, Appellant, v. STOLL et al, Respondents.
(8611-07067; CA A44238)
748 P2d 180
Stuart K. Cohen, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Timothy E. Brophy and Bernard, Kneeland, Crawford & Brophy, Portland.
Thomas M. Christ, Portland, argued the cause for respondent Delbert Stoll. With him on the brief was Mitchell, Lang & Smith, Portland.
Thomas W. Brown, Portland, argued the cause for respondent Richard W. Hagadorn. With him on the brief was Cosgrave, Kester, Crowe, Gidley & Lagesen, Portland.
Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Newman and Deits, Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Affirmed. Saechao v. Matsakoun, 78 Or App 340, 717 P2d 165, rev dismissed 302 Or 155 (1986).
Newman, J., dissenting.