Case Name: Mark I. BEDFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gordon F. ERBY, Clerk, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-01-12
Citations: 628 F. App'x 198
Docket Number: No. 15-7154
Parties: Mark I. BEDFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gordon F. ERBY, Clerk, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 628
Pages: 198–198

Head Matter:
Mark I. BEDFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gordon F. ERBY, Clerk, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 15-7154.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 28, 2015.
Decided: Jan. 12, 2016.
Mark I. Bedford, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff W. Rosen, Pender & Coward, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Mark Ivan Bedford appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bedford v. Erby, No. 2:14-cr-00280-RAJ-TEM (E.D.Va. June 30, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.