Case Name: Teresa SHEEHAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, a municipal corporation; Heather Fong, in her capacity as Chief of Police for the City and County of San Francisco; Kimberly Reynolds, individually, and in her capacity as police officer for the City and County of San Francisco; Katherine Holder, individually, and in her capacity as police officer for the City and County of San Francisco, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-07-14
Citations: 793 F.3d 1009
Docket Number: No. 11-16401
Parties: Teresa SHEEHAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, a municipal corporation; Heather Fong, in her capacity as Chief of Police for the City and County of San Francisco; Kimberly Reynolds, individually, and in her capacity as police officer for the City and County of San Francisco; Katherine Holder, individually, and in her capacity as police officer for the City and County of San Francisco, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: JOHN T. NOONAN, SUSAN P. GRABER and RAYMOND C. FISHER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 793
Pages: 1009–1009

Head Matter:
Teresa SHEEHAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, a municipal corporation; Heather Fong, in her capacity as Chief of Police for the City and County of San Francisco; Kimberly Reynolds, individually, and in her capacity as police officer for the City and County of San Francisco; Katherine Holder, individually, and in her capacity as police officer for the City and County of San Francisco, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 11-16401.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
July 14, 2015.
John L. Burris, Esquire, Ayana Alyce Cuevas-Curry, The Law Offices of John L. Burris, Oakland, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Peter Julian Keith, Deputy City, San Francisco City Attorney’s Office, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: JOHN T. NOONAN, SUSAN P. GRABER and RAYMOND C. FISHER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
In our previous opinion, Sheehan v. City & County of San Francisco, 743 F.3d 1211 (9th Cir.2014), we affirmed in part and vacated in part the judgment of the district court. In City & County of San Francisco v. Sheehan, — U.S.-, 135 S.Ct. 1765, 191 L.Ed.2d 856 (2015), the Supreme Court reversed our judgment in part and remanded to this court for further proceedings. Under these decisions, the district court properly granted summary judgment to the defendants on Shee-han's Fourth Amendment claims but, as explained in Parts III and IV of our previous opinion, erred by granting- summary judgment to the defendants on Sheehan's Americans with Disabilities Act and state law claims. We therefore affirm in part and vacate in part the judgment of the district court and remand to the district court for further proceedings. Each party shall bear its own costs on appeal.
AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART AND REMANDED.