Case Name: In the Matter of S. M. T., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. S. M. T., Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2008-10-15
Citations: 223 Or. App. 248
Docket Number: 050766701; A129432
Parties: In the Matter of S. M. T., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. S. M. T., Appellant.
Judges: Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Schuman, Judge, and Ortega, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 223
Pages: 248–249

Head Matter:
Submitted September 5,
reversed October 15, 2008
In the Matter of S. M. T., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. S. M. T., Appellant.
Multnomah County Circuit Court
050766701; A129432
195 P3d 470
Susan D. Isaacs filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Michael R. Washington, Senior Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Schuman, Judge, and Ortega, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Appellant seeks reversal of the trial court's order of civil commitment, arguing that the evidence was not clear and convincing that, because of her mental disorder, she is a danger to herself or unable to provide for her basic needs. ORS 426.005(1)(d). The state concedes the error. On de novo review, State v. Miller, 198 Or App 153, 155, 107 P3d 683 (2005), we agree that the evidence is legally insufficient to support an order of civil commitment.
Reversed.