Case Name: UNION BANK OF ROCHESTER v. SHERWOOD et al.
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1898-06-18
Citations: 53 N.Y.S. 1117
Docket Number: 
Parties: UNION BANK OF ROCHESTER v. SHERWOOD et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 53
Pages: 1117–1117

Head Matter:
UNION BANK OF ROCHESTER v. SHERWOOD et al.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
June 18, 1898.)
Action by the Union Bank of Rochester against Frederick A. Sherwood, impleaded, etc.

Opinion:
No opinion. Motion for leave to appeal to the court of appeals granted, and the following questions certified to that court, viz.:-(1) Was the defendant Sherwood a bona fidepurchaser for value, not having delivered all the notes of Bolton, which he agreed to deliver, prior to his receiving notice that the sale to Mm and Mrs. Bolton was claimed to be in fraud of creditors? (2) The trial court having found that said bill of sale of August 2, 1893,. was fraudulent and void, in so far as it transferred property to Mrs. Bolton, does it follow, as a matter of law, from the findings and from, the undisputed facts in the case, that said bill' of sale was fraudulent as to both vendees, named therein?