Case Name: Joseph FURROW, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Barry A. BISSON, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-04-19
Citations: 177 F. App'x 671
Docket Number: No. 05-56438
Parties: Joseph FURROW, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Barry A. BISSON, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before: KOZINSKI, RYMER and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 177
Pages: 671–672

Head Matter:
Joseph FURROW, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Barry A. BISSON, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 05-56438.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 10, 2006.
Filed April 19, 2006.
Joseph Furrow, Los Alamitos, CA, pro se.
Barry A. Bisson, Esq., Law Offices of Dat T. Dang, Westminster, CA, pro se.
Before: KOZINSKI, RYMER and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Appellee's letter dated January 27, 2006, is construed as a Motion for Summary Affirmance. A review of the record and the opening brief indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.