Case Name: Elmer A. ZUNIGA-SANTANA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Patricia R. STANSBERRY, Warden, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-06-26
Citations: 187 F. App'x 268
Docket Number: No. 05-7794
Parties: Elmer A. ZUNIGA-SANTANA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Patricia R. STANSBERRY, Warden, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 187
Pages: 268–268

Head Matter:
Elmer A. ZUNIGA-SANTANA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Patricia R. STANSBERRY, Warden, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 05-7794.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 22, 2006.
Decided: June 26, 2006.
Elmer A. Zuniga-Santana, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Elmer A. Zuniga-Santana, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Zuniga-Santana v. Stansberry, No. CA-05-488-5 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 28, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.