Case Name: Toledo Bar Association v. Rust
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1996-02-28
Citations: 74 Ohio St. 3d 635
Docket Number: No. 95-2128
Parties: Toledo Bar Association v. Rust.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Wright, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 74
Pages: 635–637

Head Matter:
Toledo Bar Association v. Rust.
[Cite as Toledo Bar Assn. v. Rust (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 635.]
(No. 95-2128
Submitted December 6, 1995
Decided February 28, 1996.)
Joseph L. Wittenberg; Paul D. Giha; Frank W. Cubboh, Jr. & Associates and Guy T. Barone, for relator.
Marshall & Melhom and Richard M. Kerger, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Upon review of the record, we concur in the board's findings of misconduct, but we consider public reprimand a sufficient sanction. Respondent is therefore publicly reprimanded for his violations of DR 5-105(A) and (B) and 9-102(A). Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Wright, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.
Douglas and Resnick, JJ., not participating.