Case Name: Rome City School District, Respondent, v. New York Telephone Company et al., Defendants, and Automatic Conservation of Energy, Inc., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1994-09-30
Citations: 207 A.D.2d 966
Docket Number: Appeal No. 3
Parties: Rome City School District, Respondent, v New York Telephone Company et al., Defendants, and Automatic Conservation of Energy, Inc., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 207
Pages: 966–966

Head Matter:
Rome City School District, Respondent, v New York Telephone Company et al., Defendants, and Automatic Conservation of Energy, Inc., Appellant.
(Appeal No. 3.)
[617 NYS2d 657]

Opinion:
—Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs (see, Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988; see also, CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Tenney, J.—Amended Answer.) Present —Green, J. P., Pine, Fallon, Callahan and Davis, JJ.