Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Desmond BURNETT, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-04-17
Citations: 466 F. App'x 381
Docket Number: No. 11-60272
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Desmond BURNETT, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 466
Pages: 381–381

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Desmond BURNETT, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-60272
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 17, 2012.
Scott F. Leary, Esq., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Oxford, MS, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Kevin J. Payne, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Oxford, MS, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Desmond Burnett pleaded guilty to distributing methamphetamine and possessing with intent to distribute in excess of 5 grams of cocaine base. In his sole issue on appeal, he contends that the district court erred by refusing to apply the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010(FSA) to his sentence. His argument is foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Tickles, 661 F.3d 212, 215 (5th Cir.2011), petitions for cert. filed (Dec. 15, 2011) (No. 11-8028) and (Dec. 27, 2011) (No. 11-8268), which held that the FSA does not apply retroactively to defendants whose sentencing occurred after the FSA's effective date but whose offenses occurred before the effective date. Although the Supreme Court has recently granted certiorari in two Seventh Circuit cases that held that the FSA does not apply retroactively, our precedent is nevertheless binding. See United States v. Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.3d 804, 808 n. 1 (5th Cir.2008).
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.