Case Name: Donald ARNOLD, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2007-11-20
Citations: 239 S.W.3d 130
Docket Number: No. ED 89148
Parties: Donald ARNOLD, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 239
Pages: 130–130

Head Matter:
Donald ARNOLD, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 89148.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Nov. 20, 2007.
Jessica M. Hathaway, Saint Louis, MO, for Movant/Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary H. Moore, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent/Respondent.
Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Donald Arnold (Movant) appeals from the motion court's denial, after an eviden-tiary hearing, of Movant's Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant was convicted, following a jury trial, of one count of first-degree assault, and one count of armed criminal action.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. Unless otherwise indicated, all rule citations are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2006.
. This Court affirmed Movant's convictions in State v. Arnold, 173 S.W.3d 691 (Mo.App. E.D.2005).