Case Name: Ronald Satish EMRIT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARYLAND STATE BAR ASSOCIATION; United States Department of Education; American Bar Association; National Conference of Bar Examiners, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-12-17
Citations: 624 F. App'x 115
Docket Number: No. 15-2131
Parties: Ronald Satish EMRIT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARYLAND STATE BAR ASSOCIATION; United States Department of Education; American Bar Association; National Conference of Bar Examiners, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before GREGORY and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 624
Pages: 115–115

Head Matter:
Ronald Satish EMRIT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARYLAND STATE BAR ASSOCIATION; United States Department of Education; American Bar Association; National Conference of Bar Examiners, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15-2131.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 15, 2015.
Decided: Dec. 17, 2015.
Ronald Satish Emrit, Appellant Pro Se.
Before GREGORY and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ronald Satish Emrit appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. Emrit v. Md. State Bar Ass'n., No. 1:15-cv-02548-JKB (D.Md. filed Sept. 10, 2015 & entered Sept. 11, 2015); see Shailendra Kumar, P.A. v. Dhanda, 426 Md. 185, 43 A.3d 1029, 1039-41 (2012) (addressing tolling). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions, are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.