Case Name: Luckenbill v. Midwestern Indemn. Co.
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2001-10-10
Citations: 93 Ohio St. 3d 1300
Docket Number: 01-1678
Parties: Luckenbill v. Midwestern Indemn. Co.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney,' Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 93
Pages: 1300–1300

Head Matter:
Wednesday, October 10, 2001
MERIT DOCKET
01-1678.
Luckenbill v. Midwestern Indemn. Co.

Opinion:
Darke App. No. 01CA1536. On order certifying the following conflict to the Supreme Court:
"Does a provision in a policy of homeowner's liability insurance that requires the insured to provide notice to the insurer before settling a claim on which the insurer has rights of subrogation, and which conditions the insurer's duty to provide coverage on the insured's compliance with that notice provision, likewise apply to any uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage which is impressed on the homeowner's policy as a matter of law pursuant to R.C. 3937.18?"
The court determines that no conflict exists within the meaning of S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(2)(B). This cause is therefore dismissed.
Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney,' Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Douglas and Cook, JJ., dissent.