Case Name: Brenda P. LOWDER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HARTFORD LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee, and Group Benefit Plan; Farmer's Telephone Cooperative, Incorporated, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-05-11
Citations: 128 F. App'x 339
Docket Number: No. 04-1594
Parties: Brenda P. LOWDER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HARTFORD LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant— Appellee, and Group Benefit Plan; Farmer’s Telephone Cooperative, Incorporated, Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 128
Pages: 339–339

Head Matter:
Brenda P. LOWDER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HARTFORD LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant— Appellee, and Group Benefit Plan; Farmer’s Telephone Cooperative, Incorporated, Defendants.
No. 04-1594.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 27, 2005.
Decided: May 11, 2005.
Chalmers C. Johnson, Chalmers Johnson Law Firm, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellant.
Debbie W. Harden, Katherine T. Lange, Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Ap-pellee.
Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Brenda P. Lowder appeals the district court's order denying relief on her claim seeking disability benefits from a plan governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Lowder v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co., No. CA-02-1355-4-23 (D.S.C. Mar. 24, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED