Case Name: KARUK TRIBE OF CALIFORNIA, a federally recognized organization; and Friends of the River Foundation, a California nonprofit organization, Respondents on Review, v. TRI-COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT OF OREGON, Petitioner on Review
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2014-04-17
Citations: 355 Or. 239
Docket Number: CC 080202663; CA A139375; SC S059484
Parties: KARUK TRIBE OF CALIFORNIA, a federally recognized organization; and Friends of the River Foundation, a California nonprofit organization, Respondents on Review, v. TRI-COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT OF OREGON, Petitioner on Review.
Judges: Before Balmer, Chief Justice, and Kistler, Walters, Linder, Landau, and Baldwin, Justices.
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 355
Pages: 239–240

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted March 8, 2012, at the University of Oregon College of Law; resubmitted January 7, 2013,
decision of Court of Appeals and judgment of circuit court affirmed by an equally divided court April 17, 2014
KARUK TRIBE OF CALIFORNIA, a federally recognized organization; and Friends of the River Foundation, a California nonprofit organization, Respondents on Review, v. TRI-COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT OF OREGON, Petitioner on Review.
(CC 080202663; CA A139375; SC S059484)
323 P3d 947
Keith M. Garza, Oak Grove, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner on review,
Thomas M. Christ, Cosgrave, Vergeer Kester LLP, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents on review.
Erin C. Lagesen, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed a brief for amicus curiae State of Oregon. With her on the brief were John R. Kroger, Attorney General, and Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General.
Tracy Pool Reeve, Senior Deputy City Attorney, Portland City Attorney’s Office, filed a brief for amicus curiae League of Oregon Cities.
Before Balmer, Chief Justice, and Kistler, Walters, Linder, Landau, and Baldwin, Justices.
Brewer, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
The decision of the Court of Appeals and the judgment of the circuit court are affirmed by an equally divided court.