Case Name: Michael A. ANDERSON, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION and Florida Department of Corrections, Respondents
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2008-01-31
Citations: 974 So. 2d 505
Docket Number: No. 1D07-4893
Parties: Michael A. ANDERSON, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION and Florida Department of Corrections, Respondents.
Judges: WEBSTER, BENTON, and POLSTON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 974
Pages: 505–505

Head Matter:
Michael A. ANDERSON, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION and Florida Department of Corrections, Respondents.
No. 1D07-4893.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jan. 31, 2008.
Michael A. Anderson, pro se, Petitioner.
Kim M. Fluharty, General Counsel, and Bradley R. Bischoff, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Parole Commission; Kathleen Von Hoene, General Counsel; Beverly Brewster, Assistant General Counsel, and Monica Ryan, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The circuit court issued its order on petitioner's petition for writ of mandamus without affording adequate time for petitioner to file a reply to the Department of Corrections' response. The circuit court received petitioner's reply after the final order disposing of the mandamus petition had been entered. Accordingly, the petition for writ of certiorari is granted, and the order of the circuit court is quashed. Bard v. Wolson, 687 So.2d 254 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). The cause is remanded to the circuit court to dispose of the mandamus petition after review of that petition, the responses, and the timely replies.
PETITION GRANTED.
WEBSTER, BENTON, and POLSTON, JJ., concur.