Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Reynol Villarreal SALINAS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-03-09
Citations: 595 F. App'x 453
Docket Number: No. 13-20199
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Reynol Villarreal SALINAS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 595
Pages: 453–454

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Reynol Villarreal SALINAS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-20199.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 9, 2015.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Joanne Marie Musick, Musick & Musick, L.L.P., Houston, TX, Reynol Villarreal Salinas, FDC Oakdale, Oakdale, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Reynol Villarreal Salinas has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Villarreal Salinas has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Villarreal Salinas's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 123, 190 L.Ed.2d 94 (2014).
We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Villarreal Salinas's response. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.