Case Name: Christina D. PERRY-BEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF NORFOLK, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-02-22
Citations: 412 F. App'x 638
Docket Number: No. 10-1255
Parties: Christina D. PERRY-BEY, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. CITY OF NORFOLK, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 412
Pages: 638–639

Head Matter:
Christina D. PERRY-BEY, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. CITY OF NORFOLK, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 10-1255.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 81, 2011.
Decided: Feb. 22, 2011.
Christina D. Perry-Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Wilbur Jacobs, II, Christian & Barton, LLP, Richmond, Virginia; Melvin Wayne Ringer, City Attorney’s Office, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Christina D. Perry-Bey appeals the district court's order dismissing this action with prejudice for failure to comply with a court order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Perry-Bey v. City of Norfolk, No. 2:08-cv-00100-MSD-DEM (E.D.Va. Apr. 6, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. The motion to expedite is denied as moot.
AFFIRMED.