Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Vance Marcel GIBSON, a/k/a Reginald Hilton Belton, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-11-02
Citations: 486 F. App'x 381
Docket Number: No. 12-6912
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Vance Marcel GIBSON, a/k/a Reginald Hilton Belton, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 486
Pages: 381–381

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Vance Marcel GIBSON, a/k/a Reginald Hilton Belton, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-6912.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 20, 2012.
Decided: Nov. 2, 2012.
Vance Marcel Gibson, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Hairston, Robert Michael Hamilton, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, NC, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Vance Marcel Gibson appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a reduction of sentence based on Amendment 750 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (2011). We have reviewed the record and conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See United States v. Stewart, 595 F.3d 197, 200 (4th Cir.2010). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Gibson, No. 6:93-cr-00211-TDS-1 (M.D.N.C. May 9, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.