Case Name: Nettie Peck v. Nebraska Loan & Trust Company
Court: Nebraska Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Nebraska
Decision Date: 1897-01-07
Citations: 50 Neb. 227
Docket Number: No. 6976
Parties: Nettie Peck v. Nebraska Loan & Trust Company.
Judges: Ragan, C., having been of counsel, took no part in the consideration of this case.
Reporter: Nebraska Reports
Volume: 50
Pages: 227–228

Head Matter:
Nettie Peck v. Nebraska Loan & Trust Company.
Filed January 7, 1897.
No. 6976.
Review: Transcript: Original Pleadings. The requirement that there shall he a transcript of the proceedings of the district court filed in the supreme court is not complied with by filing the original pleadings with a certified transcript of the record showing the entry of a judgment; and under such circumstances the judgment sought to be reversed, when found from the transcript to have been within the jurisdiction of district court, will he affirmed.
Error from the district court of Adams county. Tried below before Beall, J.
Affirmed.
Capps & Stevens and A. W. Agee, for plaintiff in error.
John A. Casto and J. B. Cessna, contra.

Opinion:
Ryan, O.
There was in this case a judgment in the district court of Adams county in favor of the plaintiff in error for the sum of $425.65, and an order requiring that the clerk of said court pay said judgment with an equal amount of money deposited in his hands for that purpose. The transcript of this judgment shows that it was within the jurisdiction of the said court; indeed, plaintiff in error practically admits this, contending, moreover, that it should have been for a greater sum. By stipulation, the parties brought into this court the original pleadings, certified as such by the clerk of the district court, and there is on file no other means of ascertaining what issues were presented and tried in the district court. It has been repeatedly held that the filing of a certified transcript of the pleadings is jurisdictional, and that where the judgment is one within the jurisdiction of the district court, as shown by a transcript thereof, it will be affirmed. (Moore v. Waterman, 40 Neb., 498; Bell v. Beller, 40 Neb., 501; School District v. Cooper, 44 Neb., 714; Romberg v. Fokken, 47 Neb., 198.) The judgment of the district court is accordingly
Affirmed.
Ragan, C., having been of counsel, took no part in the consideration of this case.