Case Name: In the Interest of D.H. Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. S.H. (Father), Appellant, T.E. (Mother), Defendant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-09-12
Citations: 200 S.W.3d 606
Docket Number: No. WD 66531
Parties: In the Interest of D.H. Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. S.H. (Father), Appellant, T.E. (Mother), Defendant.
Judges: Before ULRICH, P.J., SMITH and HARDWICK, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 200
Pages: 606–607

Head Matter:
In the Interest of D.H. Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. S.H. (Father), Appellant, T.E. (Mother), Defendant.
No. WD 66531.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Sept. 12, 2006.
Paul M. Tancredi, Kansas City, MO, for appellant S.H.
William R. Jackson, III, Kansas City, MO, for respondent Juvenile Officer.
Michelle R. Meier, Kansas City, MO, Co-Counsel for respondent.
William C. Pevestroff, Jr., Independence, MO, for defendant T.E.
Katherine J. Rodgers, Kansas City, MO, Attorney and Guardian for D.H.
Before ULRICH, P.J., SMITH and HARDWICK, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
S.H. (Father) appeals from the judgment terminating parental rights to his son, D.H. Father contends the evidence was insufficient to support the termination of his parental rights on grounds of abandonment, abuse and neglect, and the failure to rectify conditions of a potentially harmful nature. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we affirm the judgment, finding clear, cogent, and convincing evidence to support the termination on grounds of abandonment.
We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision because a published opinion would have no precedential value.
AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).