Case Name: Aaron Van Houten, respondent, v. Mary V. H. Stevenson et al., appellants
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1905-06-26
Citations: 69 N.J. Eq. 835
Docket Number: 
Parties: Aaron Van Houten, respondent, v. Mary V. H. Stevenson et al., appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 69
Pages: 835–835

Head Matter:
Aaron Van Houten, respondent, v. Mary V. H. Stevenson et al., appellants.
[Argued June 23d, 1905.
Decided June 26th, 1905.]
’ On appeal from a decree in chancery based on opinions filed by Vice-Chancellor Stevens and Vice-Chancellor Garrison, whose opinions are reported, respectively, ante p. 626 and in 68 N. J. Bq. 490.
Mr. Preston Stevenson, for the appellants.
Mr. Frederich If. Van Blarcom, for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinions of Vice-Chancellors Stevens and Garrison, delivered in the court of chancery in this canse.
For affirmance—-The Chiee-Justice, Dixon, Garrison, Garretson, Pitney, Swayze, Eeed, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray—12.
For reversal—None.