Case Name: Lillie Mae CRAWFORD, Petitioner, v. Samuel BARON and Ethel Baron, Respondents; Lillie Mae CRAWFORD, Appellant, v. Samuel BARON and Ethel Baron, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1970-08-18
Citations: 238 So. 2d 311
Docket Number: Nos. 70-513, 70-537
Parties: Lillie Mae CRAWFORD, Petitioner, v. Samuel BARON and Ethel Baron, Respondents. Lillie Mae CRAWFORD, Appellant, v. Samuel BARON and Ethel Baron, Appellees.
Judges: Before PEARSON, C. J., and HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 238
Pages: 311–311

Head Matter:
Lillie Mae CRAWFORD, Petitioner, v. Samuel BARON and Ethel Baron, Respondents. Lillie Mae CRAWFORD, Appellant, v. Samuel BARON and Ethel Baron, Appellees.
Nos. 70-513, 70-537.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Aug. 18, 1970.
Charles J. Bodner, Miami, for petitioner-appellant.
Bette S. Baron, North Miami, Smith, Mandler, Smith & Parker, Miami Beach, for respondents-appcllees.
Before PEARSON, C. J., and HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Number 70-513 is a petition for certio-rari. Number 70-537 is an interlocutory appeal. Both proceedings seek review of an order setting the cause for a non-jury trial.
On June 19, 1970, we entered an order staying all appellate proceedings in these causes and temporarily relinquishing jurisdiction to the trial court to consider a possible stipulation of the parties. The parties have been unable to arrive at a stipulation. We therefore rescind our order of June 19, 1970, and reassume jurisdiction over this cause.
Appellant has demonstrated that she was entitled to a jury trial. See Hightower v. Bigoney, Fla. 1963, 156 So.2d 501, 17 A.L.R. 3d 1308, and the respondents-appellees have admitted error. Therefore the relief sought by the petitioner-appellant is hereby granted and the order under review is hereby reversed.
Reversed.