Case Name: James C. McDANIEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. APPRAISAL INSTITUTE, a Corporation Organized Under the Laws of the State of Illinois, fka American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers of the National Association of Realtors; Dan W. Mahoney, Husband; Susan Mahoney; Wife; Sanders Solot, Husband; Ruth-Jean Solot, Wife, et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1997-09-16
Citations: 127 F.3d 1135
Docket Number: No. 94-17158
Parties: James C. McDANIEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. APPRAISAL INSTITUTE, a Corporation Organized Under the Laws of the State of Illinois, fka American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers of the National Association of Realtors; Dan W. Mahoney, Husband; Susan Mahoney; Wife; Sanders Solot, Husband; Ruth-Jean Solot, Wife, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 127
Pages: 1135–1135

Head Matter:
James C. McDANIEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. APPRAISAL INSTITUTE, a Corporation Organized Under the Laws of the State of Illinois, fka American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers of the National Association of Realtors; Dan W. Mahoney, Husband; Susan Mahoney; Wife; Sanders Solot, Husband; Ruth-Jean Solot, Wife, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 94-17158.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Sept. 16, 1997.

Opinion:
ORDER
The concurring opinion, filed June 30, 1997 [117 F.3d 421], is amended as follows:
Delete the first full sentence on Slip Opinion page 7592 [117 F.3d at 424], starting with "The Institute ." and replace it with: "The Institute only accepts between two and seven percent of its candidates, and MAI appraisers get over 90% of the commercial business in Southern Arizona."
With the above amendment, the appellant's petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc is DENIED. The appellee's petition for rehearing is also DENIED.