Case Name: Blaylock v. Hackel et al.
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1928-03-14
Citations: 166 Ga. 160
Docket Number: No. 6381
Parties: Blaylock v. Hackel et al.
Judges: All the Jusliees eonour.
Reporter: Georgia Reports
Volume: 166
Pages: 160–160

Head Matter:
Blaylock v. Hackel et al.
No. 6381.
March 14, 1928.
Miln&r & Farlcas, for plaintiff. 8. B. Lippilt, for defendants.

Opinion:
Gilbert, J.
This was an equitable petition seeking to reform a deed. The exception is to a judgment overruling a motion for new trial, one of the grounds of which complained that the court erred in directing a verdict. Held:
1. The evidence did not demand direction of a verdict. On the contrary there was the issue of fact, to be determined by the jury, of whether or not the land conveyed by the deed was sold by the acre or by the tract.
2. The grounds of the motion contained in the amendment neither show error nor require mention.
Judgment reversed.
All the Jusliees eonour.