Case Name: JINGXIN YE, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-06-22
Citations: 234 F. App'x 727
Docket Number: No. 05-71798
Parties: JINGXIN YE, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 234
Pages: 727–728

Head Matter:
JINGXIN YE, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 05-71798.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 5, 2007.
Filed June 22, 2007.
Jingxin Ye, Rowland Heights, CA, pro se.
CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: LEAVY, RYMER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Jingxin Ye, a native and citizen of China, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' denial of his motion for reconsideration of its decision affirming an immigration judge's denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. He contends that the Board erred in affirming the finding that he was not credible. The Board did not abuse its discretion in denying reconsideration of its affirmance of the adverse credibility finding. See Oh v. Gonzales, 406 F.3d 611, 612 (9th Cir.2005). We therefore deny the petition for review.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.