Case Name: Bill WALKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MEMBERS OF CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES, as Individuals and in their Official Capacities; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-05-22
Citations: 180 F. App'x 770
Docket Number: No. 05-35023
Parties: Bill WALKER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. MEMBERS OF CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES, as Individuals and in their Official Capacities; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before B. FLETCHER, TROTT and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 180
Pages: 770–771

Head Matter:
Bill WALKER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. MEMBERS OF CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES, as Individuals and in their Official Capacities; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
No. 05-35023.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 15, 2006.
Decided May 22, 2006.
Bill Walker, Auburn, WA, pro se.
Karen D. Utiger, U.S. Department of Justice Tax Division, Washington, DC, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before B. FLETCHER, TROTT and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Bill Walker appeals pro se the district court's judgment dismissing sua sponte for lack of jurisdiction his action alleging that the Members of Congress, the Treasury Secretary, and the Commissioner of Internal Revenue violated the United States Constitution by failing to call a constitutional convention to consider repeal of the Sixteenth Amendment. Walker sought to hold defendants both civilly and criminally liable, and also sought reparation of federal income taxes that had been "extorted" from him by defendants.
We agree with the district court's determination that it lacked jurisdiction over the action and affirm the dismissal for the reasons stated in the district court's order to show cause, filed on October 8, 2004.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
. Walker's motion to strike the appellees' brief is denied.