Case Name: Dack DAUGHERTY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2019-04-02
Citations: 570 S.W.3d 680
Docket Number: No. ED 106714
Parties: Dack DAUGHERTY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 570
Pages: 680–680

Head Matter:
Dack DAUGHERTY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 106714
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Filed: April 2, 2019
FOR APPELLANTS: Randall Brachman, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101.
FOR RESPONDENTS: Mary Highland Moore, Eric Schmitt, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.
Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Dack Daugherty appeals the denial without an evidentiary hearing of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief based on a single allegation of ineffective assistance of counsel. We find no clear error because Daugherty failed to plead facts not refuted by the record warranting relief. Thus, no evidentiary hearing was required.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).