Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Antoine NELSON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-01-23
Citations: 262 F. App'x 589
Docket Number: No. 07-40545
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Antoine NELSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING, DAVIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 262
Pages: 589–590

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Antoine NELSON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-40545
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Jan. 23, 2008.
David Haskell Henderson, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Texas, Beaumont, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Frank Warren Henderson, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Defender’s Office, Eastern District of Texas, Tyler, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before KING, DAVIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Antoine Nelson appeals his sentence following his guilty-plea for assaulting an employee of the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 111(a)(1) & (b). Nelson's sole argument on appeal is that the district court erred in applying U.S.S.G. § 2A2.2 based on its finding that the boiling water thrown by Nelson onto a corrections officer was a "dangerous weapon" under the Guidelines. Nelson argues that under § 2A2.2 a "dangerous weapon" refers only to "instruments" and not to substances, such as water. Nelson does not refute, however, the district court's finding that the assault caused serious bodily injuries.
Nelson has failed to demonstrate any error in the district court's finding that the hot water, in the manner used and in light of the injuries sustained, was a "dangerous weapon" under § 2A2.2. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.