Case Name: JOSEPH LEVI, et al., Respondents v. EDWARD S. NEWHALL, et al., Appellants
Court: New York Superior Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1890-03-04
Citations: 26 Jones & S. 557
Docket Number: 
Parties: JOSEPH LEVI, et al., Respondents v. EDWARD S. NEWHALL, et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Reports of cases argued and determined in the Superior Court of the city of New York
Volume: 58
Pages: 557–557

Head Matter:
JOSEPH LEVI, et al., Respondents v. EDWARD S. NEWHALL, et al., Appellants.
Appeal from ajudgment entered on a referee’s report, practice on, exceptions when unnecessary.—The general ¿erro will consider without an exception the question whether the findings of fact are against the weight of the ■ evidence, but to present that question there must be a certificate of the referee that all of the evidence is in the case.
Before Trtjax and Dugro, JJ.
Decided March 4, 1890.
Appeal from a judgment entered on the report of a referee.
George P. Webster and Allen McDonald, for appellants.
Simpson & Werner, for respondents.

Opinion:
The court affirmed the judgment below, holding, among other things (Truax, J., writing and Dugro, J., concurring), as stated in the head note.