Case Name: Charles MEDINA; Moses Wallace; Ophero Jones; Renaldo Magbual, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Ted SAKAI; Wesley Mun, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-01-18
Citations: 25 F. App'x 634
Docket Number: No. 00-17380. D.C. No. CV-99-00876-SOM
Parties: Charles MEDINA; Moses Wallace; Ophero Jones; Renaldo Magbual, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Ted SAKAI; Wesley Mun, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 25
Pages: 634–635

Head Matter:
Charles MEDINA; Moses Wallace; Ophero Jones; Renaldo Magbual, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Ted SAKAI; Wesley Mun, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 00-17380. D.C. No. CV-99-00876-SOM.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 16, 2002.
Decided Jan. 18, 2002.
Before GOODWIN, NOONAN, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
ORDER
For the reasons given by the district court in its thorough Order dated Novem ber 1, 2000, Granting Defendants Ted Sakai and Wesley Man's Motion for Summary Judgment, we affirm the decision of that court.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publi cation and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.