Case Name: Donald Grant, Appellant, v. The City of New York, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1909-02-09
Citations: 194 N.Y. 566
Docket Number: 
Parties: Donald Grant, Appellant, v. The City of New York, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 194
Pages: 566–567

Head Matter:
Donald Grant, Appellant, v. The City of New York, Respondent.
Grant v. City of New York, 122 App. Div. 890, affirmed.
(Argued January 18, 1909;
decided February 9, 1909.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 10, 1907, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term without a jury in an action to recover sa’ary as inspector of police "from' the date of the plaintiff’s illegal dismissal to the date of his reinstatement.
Terence J. McManus, William M. K. Olcott and T. B. Chancellor for appellant.
Francis K. Pendleton, Corporation Counsel (Theodore Connoly and Terence Farley of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion of Ingraham, J., in Appellate Division on previous appeal (111 App. Div. 160).
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, IIiscock and Chase, JJ.