Case Name: Alex Thomas HUNT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. E.E. WRIGHT, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-01-17
Citations: 1 F. App'x 249
Docket Number: No. 00-6897
Parties: Alex Thomas HUNT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. E.E. WRIGHT, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 1
Pages: 249–249

Head Matter:
Alex Thomas HUNT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. E.E. WRIGHT, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 00-6897.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 11, 2001.
Decided Jan. 17, 2001.
Alex Thomas Hunt, pro se. Eugene Paul Murphy, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for appel-lee.
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Alex Thomas Hunt seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeala-bility and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Hunt v. Wright, No. CA-99-795-AM (E.D.Va. filed June 5, 2000; entered June 7, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.