Case Name: Donald R. NAPPIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2018-10-16
Citations: 559 S.W.3d 114
Docket Number: No. ED 105816
Parties: Donald R. NAPPIER, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Roy L. Richter, P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., Angela T. Quigless, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 559
Pages: 114–114

Head Matter:
Donald R. NAPPIER, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 105816
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Filed: October 16, 2018
Damien De Loyola, Amanda R. Langenheim, Co-Counsel, 920 Main Street, Suite 500, Kansas City, MO. 65203, for appellant.
Julia E. Neidhardt, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO. 65102, for respondent.
Before Roy L. Richter, P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., Angela T. Quigless, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Donald R. Nappier appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15 (2014) motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 84.16(b) (2018).