Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Sandy Rogers, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1989-10-06
Citations: 154 A.D.2d 924
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Sandy Rogers, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 154
Pages: 924–924

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Sandy Rogers, Appellant.

Opinion:
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant's contention that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel; viewing together the evidence, the law, and the circumstances of the case, we find that meaningful representation was provided (see, People v Satterfield, 66 NY2d 796, 798-800; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 146-147). We also reject his contention that his sentence was harsh and excessive. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Doyle, J. — criminal sale of controlled substance, third degree.) Present — Denman, J. P., Green, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.