Case Name: Bricia Azalia VELASCO, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-12-18
Citations: 84 F. App'x 839
Docket Number: No. 02-73574; Agency No. A76-679-688
Parties: Bricia Azalia VELASCO, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before GOODWIN, WALLACE, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 84
Pages: 839–840

Head Matter:
Bricia Azalia VELASCO, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 02-73574.
Agency No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 8, 2003.
Decided Dec. 18, 2003.
Martin Resendez Guajardo, Esq., Law Office of Martin Resendez Guajardo, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.
Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, OfSce of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Linda S. Wernery, Esq., John M. McAdams, Jr., U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before GOODWIN, WALLACE, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Brida Azalia Velasco, native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' summary affirmance of the Immigration Judge's ("IJ") denial of her application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 to review a purely legal determination, and we review de novo. See Montero-Martinez v. Ashcroft, 277 F.3d 1137, 1144-45 (9th Cir. 2002).
The IJ properly found that Velasco was ineligible for cancellation of removal because she failed to establish ten years of continuous physical presence in the United States. See id. at 1145.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.