Case Name: Thomas SKELLEY, Respondent, v. LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, and Reliance National Insurance Company/Heritage Claim Service, Relators
Court: Minnesota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Minnesota
Decision Date: 2006-10-25
Citations: 722 N.W.2d 927
Docket Number: No. A06-1358
Parties: Thomas SKELLEY, Respondent, v. LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, and Reliance National Insurance Company/Heritage Claim Service, Relators.
Judges: 
Reporter: North Western Reporter 2d
Volume: 722
Pages: 927–928

Head Matter:
Thomas SKELLEY, Respondent, v. LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, and Reliance National Insurance Company/Heritage Claim Service, Relators.
No. A06-1358.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
Oct. 25, 2006.

Opinion:
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed June 27, 2006, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that, [s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).
Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Russell A. Anderson Chief Justice