Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George Lawrence ANDREWS, also known as Larry Andrews, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-11-09
Citations: 153 F. App'x 943
Docket Number: No. 05-50398
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George Lawrence ANDREWS, also known as Larry Andrews, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before REAVLEY, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 153
Pages: 943–943

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George Lawrence ANDREWS, also known as Larry Andrews, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-50398.
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Decided Nov. 9, 2005.
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Judy Fulmer Madewell, Federal Public Defender’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before REAVLEY, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, George Lawrence Andrews raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Scroggins, 411 F.3d 572, 576-77 (5th Cir.2005), which held that the Due Process Clause does not bar the application of Justice Breyer's remedy opinion in United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), when resentencing defendants in light of Booker. The Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.