Case Name: STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Louis DEISROTH and Richard Noyes, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-12-22
Citations: 630 So. 2d 1165
Docket Number: Nos. 91-03731, 91-03749
Parties: STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Louis DEISROTH and Richard Noyes, Appellees.
Judges: CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and PARKER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 630
Pages: 1165–1166

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Louis DEISROTH and Richard Noyes, Appellees.
Nos. 91-03731, 91-03749.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Dec. 22, 1993.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee; Katherine V. Blanco and David R. Gemmer, Asst. Attys. Gen., Tampa, for appellant.
Robert M. Johnson, Tampa, for appellee Deisroth.
Ronnie G. Crider, Clearwater, for appellee Noyes.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Because these two appeals involve the same question of law, they are hereby consolidated. The State of Florida challenges an order excluding breath test results from these prosecutions for driving under the influence. We reverse on the authority of State v. Folsom, 630 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993) and State v. Berger, 605 So.2d 488 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).
CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and PARKER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.