Case Name: Michelle Melino, Appellant, v. Rhonda L. Lauster et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1993-11-22
Citations: 82 N.Y.2d 828
Docket Number: 
Parties: Michelle Melino, Appellant, v Rhonda L. Lauster et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 82
Pages: 828–830

Head Matter:
[625 NE2d 589, 605 NYS2d 4]
Michelle Melino, Appellant, v Rhonda L. Lauster et al., Respondents.
Decided November 22, 1993
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Lewis & Stanzione, Catskill (Ralph C. Lewis, Jr., of counsel), for appellant.
Edward B. Downey, Albany, and Kris T. Jackstadt for respondents.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (195 AD2d 653).
Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Hancock, Jr., Bellacosa, Smith and Levine.