Case Name: Stuart A. MCKEEVER v. William P. BARR, Attorney General
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2020-01-21
Citations: 140 S. Ct. 597
Docket Number: No. 19-307
Parties: Stuart A. MCKEEVER
v.
William P. BARR, Attorney General
Judges: 
Reporter: Supreme Court Reporter
Volume: 140
Pages: 597–598

Head Matter:
Stuart A. MCKEEVER
v.
William P. BARR, Attorney General
No. 19-307
Supreme Court of the United States.
Decided January 21, 2020
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

Opinion:
Statement of Justice BREYER respecting the denial of certiorari.
In the decision below, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit held that a district court could not authorize the release of grand jury information except as specifically enumerated in Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e). 920 F.3d 842, 850 (2019). That decision is in conflict with the decisions of several other Circuits, which have indicated that district courts retain inherent authority to release grand jury material in other appropriate cases. See, e.g., Carlson v. United States , 837 F.3d 753, 766-767 (C.A.7 2016) ; In re Craig , 131 F.3d 99, 105 (C.A.2 1997) ; In re Hastings , 735 F.2d 1261, 1271-1272 (C.A.11 1984). It also appears to conflict with the considered views of the Rules Committee. See Advisory Committee Minutes on Crim. Rules 7 (Apr. 22-23 2012), https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/fr_import/criminal-min-04-2012.pdf.
Whether district courts retain authority to release grand jury material outside those situations specifically enumerated in the Rules, or in situations like this, is an important question. It is one I think the Rules Committee both can and should revisit.