Case Name: In the Matter of Robert S. Kneip, Appellant, v. Elizabeth McWilliams, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2010-03-16
Citations: 71 A.D.3d 895
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Robert S. Kneip, Appellant, v Elizabeth McWilliams, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 71
Pages: 895–895

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Robert S. Kneip, Appellant, v Elizabeth McWilliams, Respondent.
[895 NYS2d 830]

Opinion:
In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court article 6 in which the father petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from stated portions of an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Duffy, J.), entered April 3, 2009.
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
The father concedes that his petition for a writ of habeas corpus was properly dismissed. On appeal, the father only challenges the Family Court's findings of fact and conclusions of law. Thus, the appeal must be dismissed, as findings of fact and conclusions of law are not separately appealable (see Lester & Assoc., P.C. v Eneman, 69 AD 3d 906 [2010]; Meachum v Outdoor World Corp., 273 AD2d 208 [2000]). Skelos, J.P., Santucci, Angiolillo and Chambers, JJ., concur.