Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert BIGNEY, a.k.a. Robert G. Bigney, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-09-15
Citations: 697 F. App'x 654
Docket Number: No. 17-11311 Non-Argument Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert BIGNEY, a.k.a. Robert G. Bigney, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MARTIN, ANDERSON, and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 697
Pages: 654–654

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert BIGNEY, a.k.a. Robert G. Bigney, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 17-11311 Non-Argument Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
(September 15, 2017)
Lisa A. Hirsch, Jason Wu, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Wifredo A. Ferrer, Emily M. Smachetti, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, Carmen M. Lineberger, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Fort Pierce, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Michael Caruso, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Miami, FL, Fletcher Peacock, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Fort Pierce, FL, for Defendant-Appellant
Before MARTIN, ANDERSON, and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM;
Robert Bigney appeals his 24-month total sentence imposed after the district court revoked his term of supervised release, To the extent he challenges the district court's- guideline calculation, we do not review Bigney's claim because he waived that argument at sentencing. Furthermore, Bigney's sentences were substantively reasonable: they were within his guideline range, and the court considered the relevant sentencing factors and the parties' arguments—including those about Bigney's ADHD—at sentencing.
AFFIRMED.