Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Julius WHITE, Appellant.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2018-03-20
Citations: 541 S.W.3d 717
Docket Number: No. ED 105200
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent,
v.
Julius WHITE, Appellant.
Judges: Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 541
Pages: 717–718

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent,
v.
Julius WHITE, Appellant.
No. ED 105200
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
FILED: March 20, 2018
Laquetta S. Ruston, 3156 Pershall Rd., Suite 112, St. Louis, MO 63136, for appellant.
Joshua Hawley, Garrick Aplin, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.
Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Julius White ("White") appeals from the trial court's judgment, entered after a jury found him guilty of second-degree robbery. On appeal, White argues that the State presented insufficient evidence to support his conviction. Because the State offered evidence that White stole money from Victim and bit Victim to accomplish the theft, the jury heard sufficient evidence to support White's second-degree-robbery conviction.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).