Case Name: State ex rel. The Cincinnati Enquirer v. Cincinnati
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1995-08-15
Citations: 73 Ohio St. 3d 1433
Docket Number: 95-677
Parties: State ex rel. The Cincinnati Enquirer v. Cincinnati.
Judges: 
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 73
Pages: 1433–1433

Head Matter:
Tuesday, August 15, 1995
MOTION DOCKET
95-677.
State ex rel. The Cincinnati Enquirer v. Cincinnati.

Opinion:
In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. On August 7,1995, respondent filed a merit brief that was due August 3, 1995. S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(1)(C) prohibits the filing of a brief that is not timely tendered for filing. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the merit brief be, and hereby is, stricken, and that, accordingly, the stipulation for extension of time to file a reply brief also be, and hereby is, stricken.