Case Name: Thomas Lattie MCLAMB, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patricia R. STANSBERRY, Warden, LSCI Butner, North Carolina, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-06-06
Citations: 133 F. App'x 77
Docket Number: No. 04-7814
Parties: Thomas Lattie MCLAMB, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Patricia R. STANSBERRY, Warden, LSCI Butner, North Carolina, Respondent—Appellee.
Judges: Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 133
Pages: 77–77

Head Matter:
Thomas Lattie MCLAMB, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Patricia R. STANSBERRY, Warden, LSCI Butner, North Carolina, Respondent—Appellee.
No. 04-7814.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 25, 2005.
Decided June 6, 2005.
Thomas Lattie McLamb, Appellant pro se.
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Thomas Lattie McLamb, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See McLamb v. Stansberry, No. CA-04-600-5-FL (E.D.N.C. Oct. 19, 2004). We grant McLamb's motion to file a document styled as a formal brief, and we have considered the arguments therein. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED