Case Name: Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Account of the Long Island Loan and Trust Company as Trustee Under a Trust for the Benefit of Lillie G. Sloan Created by the Last Will and Testament of Stephen Garretson, Deceased
Court: New York Surrogate's Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1913-01
Citations: 79 Misc. 176
Docket Number: 
Parties: Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Account of the Long Island Loan and Trust Company as Trustee Under a Trust for the Benefit of Lillie G. Sloan Created by the Last Will and Testament of Stephen Garretson, Deceased.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 79
Pages: 176–177

Head Matter:
Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Account of the Long Island Loan and Trust Company as Trustee Under a Trust for the Benefit of Lillie G. Sloan Created by the Last Will and Testament of Stephen Garretson, Deceased.
(Surrogate’s Court, Kings County,
January, 1913.)
Executors and administrators — costs and expenses of annual accounting — annual accounting of trustee.
The costs and expenses of an annual accounting by a testamentary trustee should be borne by the income unless they have been incurred in the administration, preservation or increase of the principal.
Proceeding upon the judicial settlement of the account of a trustee.
George S. Ingraham, for accounting trustee.
Charles D. Ridgway, special guardian for infant remaindermen.

Opinion:
Ketcham, S.
In an annual accounting of a trustee the costs and expenses should be borne by the income unless they have been incurred in the administration, preservation or increase of the principal.
The cases of Chisholm v. Hammersley, 113 App. Div. 565; Robertson v. De Brulatour, 188 N. Y. 301, wontain nothing to the contrary.
The first case arose under a deed of trust. There was, therefore, no need of an annual accounting and no danger that the principal might be seriously impaired by the costs of many successive accountings. The action was brought for the final adjustment of the trust both as to income and principal and the only question litigated was whether, the entire fund was large enough to justify full commissions to each trustee. The burden of the inquiry almost wholly concerned the principal fund.
In the other case, the conflict was between the life tenant and the remainderman under a testamentary trust, as to whether certain accretions of stock left by the testator belonged to the life tenant or the remainderman, .and each party to the controversy prevailed in part. Both appealed and it was apparently only the costs of such appeal which the. court considered. The direction that each party to the appeal should have costs thereof and that the same should be assessed upon the capital " in order that the burden might be equitably borne " affords no guide.for the present purpose.
Let the expenses of making the account and the costs to be awarded be paid from the income.
Decreed accordingly.