Case Name: State of Connecticut v. Stanford L. Frye
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1992-03-05
Citations: 221 Conn. 917
Docket Number: 
Parties: State of Connecticut v. Stanford L. Frye
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 221
Pages: 917–918

Head Matter:
State of Connecticut v. Stanford L. Frye

Opinion:
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 26 Conn. App. 472, is granted, limited to the following issues:
"1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant's request for hybrid representation did not require a proper canvass regarding waiver of his right to counsel?
Decided March 5, 1992
Neal Cone, assistant public defender, in support of the petition.
Frederick W. Fawcett, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
"2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant's exception to the trial court's jury instructions, regarding the absence of a limiting instruction on the defendant's criminal record, was inadequate to preserve that issue for appeal?"