Case Name: State ex rel. McCaffrey v. Mahoning Cty. Prosecutor's Office
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2011-03-02
Citations: 128 Ohio St. 3d 1416
Docket Number: 2010-1642
Parties: State ex rel. McCaffrey v. Mahoning Cty. Prosecutor’s Office.
Judges: 
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 128
Pages: 1416–1416

Head Matter:
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS
March 2, 2011
[Cite as 03/02/2011 Case Announcements #2, 2011-Ohio-918.]
MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS
2010-1642.
State ex rel. McCaffrey v. Mahoning Cty. Prosecutor’s Office.

Opinion:
In Mandamus. On respondents' motion to supplement their motion to stay or in the alternative, motion for protective order, it is ordered that the motion to supplement is granted.
On respondents' supplemented motion to stay the case pending the resolution of State v. Cafaro, Mahoning C.P. No. 2010 CR 800A-I or, in the alternative, motion for protective order filed by respondent Mahoning County Prosecuting Attorney Paul J. Gains and Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys Linette Stratford and Gina Bricker, it is ordered that the motion is denied.
On respondents' motion for extension of time to respond to discovery, it is ordered that the motion is denied.
On respondents' motion for a protective order to limit the depositions to stenographic means only, or in the alternative, to limit dissemination and use of the depositions, it is ordered that the motion is denied.