Case Name: John D. COOPER, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Don DARR & Don Darr Pontiac, Inc., Defendants/Appellants, and Diestelkamp Construction Co., Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-05-02
Citations: 897 S.W.2d 212
Docket Number: No. 66920
Parties: John D. COOPER, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Don DARR & Don Darr Pontiac, Inc., Defendants/Appellants, and Diestelkamp Construction Co., Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before AHRENS, P.J., and GRIMM and KAROHL, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 897
Pages: 212–212

Head Matter:
John D. COOPER, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Don DARR & Don Darr Pontiac, Inc., Defendants/Appellants, and Diestelkamp Construction Co., Defendant/Respondent.
No. 66920.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
May 2, 1995.
Thomas J. Casey, Jonathan E. Fortman, Casey & Meyerkord, St. Louis, for appellant.
Patricia A. Manhart, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before AHRENS, P.J., and GRIMM and KAROHL, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff, John Cooper, appeals after summary judgment in favor of defendant, Dies-telkamp Construction Co., on his personal injury claim.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).