Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Soul Martines CRUS, also known as Saul Ruis, also known as Saul Cruz Martinez, also known as Saul Omar Martinez, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-01-02
Citations: 589 F. App'x 256
Docket Number: No. 12-20788
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Soul Martines CRUS, also known as Saul Ruis, also known as Saul Cruz Martinez, also known as Saul Omar Martinez, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 589
Pages: 256–257

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Soul Martines CRUS, also known as Saul Ruis, also known as Saul Cruz Martinez, also known as Saul Omar Martinez, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-20788
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Jan. 2, 2015.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Sucharita Jana, Esq., Bellaire, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Soul Martines Crus has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 886 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Martines Crus has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's briefs and the relevant parts of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw pursuant to Anders is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Counsel's motion to withdraw based on the closing of her law practice is DENIED as unnecessary.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.