Case Name: State of Nebraska, appellee, v. James F. Gilman, appellant
Court: Nebraska Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Nebraska
Decision Date: 1967-02-24
Citations: 181 Neb. 390
Docket Number: No. 36406
Parties: State of Nebraska, appellee, v. James F. Gilman, appellant.
Judges: Heard before White, C. J., Carter, Spencer, Boslaugh, Smith, McCown, and Newton, JJ.
Reporter: Nebraska Reports
Volume: 181
Pages: 390–391

Head Matter:
State of Nebraska, appellee, v. James F. Gilman, appellant.
148 N. W. 2d 847
Filed February 24, 1967.
No. 36406.
No appearance for appellant.
Clarence A. H. Meyer, Attorney General, and Homer G. Hamilton, for appellee.
Heard before White, C. J., Carter, Spencer, Boslaugh, Smith, McCown, and Newton, JJ.

Opinion:
Smith, J.
Defendant was charged with operating a motor vehicle after suspension of his operator's license without reinstatement, second offense. An appeal having been taken to the district court, a jury found him guilty. The court determined that the violation was a second offense, and it imposed sentence. Defendant contends on appeal that the court erred in overruling a motion in arrest of judgment and in denying probation.
The complaint was unverified, but defendant first raised the question by the motion after verdict. A defective verification is subject to a motion to quash or a plea in abatement. A defendant who pleads the general issue without raising the question, however, waives the defect. See, § 29-610, 29-1808, 29-1812, 29-2104, and 29-2105, R. R. S. 1943; State v. Ninneman, 179 Neb. 729, 140 N. W. 2d 5; Morrow v. State, 140 Neb. 592, 300 N. W. 843; Davis v. State, 31 Neb. 247, 47 N. W. 854. Overruling defendant's motion was correct.
The action of the district court in imposing sentence and denying probation will not be disturbed on appeal unless the record shows an abuse of discretion. State v. Steinhausen, 180 Neb. 778, 145 N. W. 2d 584. The sentence in the present case was clearly within judicial discretion.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.