Case Name: In the Matter of the Marriage of COPENHAVER, Appellant - Cross-Respondent, and COPENHAVER, Respondent - Cross-Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1984-08-01
Citations: 69 Or. App. 333
Docket Number: 81 608; CA A29466
Parties: In the Matter of the Marriage of COPENHAVER, Appellant - Cross-Respondent, and COPENHAVER, Respondent - Cross-Appellant.
Judges: Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, Joseph, Chief Judge, and Buttler, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 69
Pages: 333–334

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted July 9,
remanded for further proceedings August 1, 1984
In the Matter of the Marriage of COPENHAVER, Appellant - Cross-Respondent, and COPENHAVER, Respondent - Cross-Appellant.
(81 608; CA A29466)
687 P2d 1086
James K. Belknap, Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant - cross-respondent.
Jack L. Kennedy, Portland, argued the cause for respondent - cross-appellant. With him on the brief were Susan E. Watts and Kennedy, King, Zimmer & O’Malley, Portland.
Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, Joseph, Chief Judge, and Buttler, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
This is a dissolution of marriage case. Husband is a circuit court judge. His financial circumstances — and, thus, the merits of this case — may have been significantly altered by an enactment of Or Laws 1983, ch 770, but it is not possible on this record to determine just what the effect of that measure is. This is, therefore, the rare case in which, in order to do justice between the parties, remand is necessary. See Sands and Sands, 64 Or App 570, 669 P2d 358 (1983).
Remanded for further proceedings. Costs to neither party.