Case Name: Daniel BAKER, Petitioner/Respondent, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Respondent/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2014-11-18
Citations: 448 S.W.3d 361
Docket Number: No. ED 101232
Parties: Daniel BAKER, Petitioner/Respondent, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Respondent/Appellant.
Judges: Before Sherri B.-Sullivan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 448
Pages: 361–361

Head Matter:
Daniel BAKER, Petitioner/Respondent, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Respondent/Appellant.
No. ED 101232
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION TWO
Filed: November 18, 2014
Adam S. Rowley, Assistant Attorney General, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65109, for appellant.
Travis L. Noble, Jr., Sindel, Sindel & Noble, 8000 Maryland Avenue, Suite 350, Clayton, Missouri 63105, for respondent.
Before Sherri B.-Sullivan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
The Director of Revenue (the Director) appeals the trial court's judgment reinstating the driver's license of Daniel Baker (Petitioner). The Director claims that the trial court erred as a matter of law by reinstating Petitioner's driving privileges because Petitioner did not properly invoke his request for counsel, in that the officer did not hear Petitioner's request. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and have determined that an extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).