Case Name: David Potter, trustee, &c., appellant, v. Mary Alice Nixon, administratrix, et al., respondents
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1914-03-16
Citations: 82 N.J. Eq. 661
Docket Number: 
Parties: David Potter, trustee, &c., appellant, v. Mary Alice Nixon, administratrix, et al., respondents.
Judges: For affirmance—The Chiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Congdon, White, Heppenheimer—13.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 82
Pages: 661–661

Head Matter:
David Potter, trustee, &c., appellant, v. Mary Alice Nixon, administratrix, et al., respondents.
[Submitted December 6th, 1913.
Decided March 16th, 1914.]
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Learning, whose opinion is reported in 81 N. J. Eq. (11 Buck,.) 888.
Messrs. Hampton & Fithian, for the appellant.
Mr. Walter H. Bacon, for Mary Alice Nixon, administratrix, respondent.
Mr. John B. B. Nixon, for Mary Nixon Everett, executrix, &c., respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning.
For affirmance—The Chiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Congdon, White, Heppenheimer—13.
For reversal—None.