Case Name: Emmanuel DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-06-12
Citations: 46 S.W.3d 671
Docket Number: No. ED 78477
Parties: Emmanuel DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 46
Pages: 671–672

Head Matter:
Emmanuel DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 78477.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
June 12, 2001.
Gwenda R. Robinson, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellants.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Richard A. Starnes, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Emmanuel Davis, appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. He contends his guilty plea was involuntary because his trial attorney provided ineffective assistance by misinforming him about the percent of his sentence he would have to serve before becoming eligible for parole. Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
. All Rule references are to the Missouri Court Rules (2001).