Case Name: Farrel PRIDE and Burlington Northern Commercial Properties, Inc., Appellants, v. C.A.T. DEVELOPMENT, L.P., Rick Thompson and Barbar Thompson, Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-10-12
Citations: 4 S.W.3d 595
Docket Number: No. ED 75850
Parties: Farrel PRIDE and Burlington Northern Commercial Properties, Inc., Appellants, v. C.A.T. DEVELOPMENT, L.P., Rick Thompson and Barbar Thompson, Respondents.
Judges: Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 4
Pages: 595–595

Head Matter:
Farrel PRIDE and Burlington Northern Commercial Properties, Inc., Appellants, v. C.A.T. DEVELOPMENT, L.P., Rick Thompson and Barbar Thompson, Respondents.
No. ED 75850.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Oct. 12, 1999.
Casserly Jones, St. Louis, for appellant.
Samantha Harris, Columbia, for respondent.
Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellants Farrel Pride ("Pride") and Burlington Northern Commercial Properties, Inc. ("BNCP") appeal from the denial of a motion to set aside a default judgment in favor of Respondents C.A.T. Development, L.P., Rick Thompson, and Barbara Thompson (collectively referred to as "C.A.T."). Pride and BNCP claim that their motion showed good cause for the default and demonstrated the existence of a meritorious defense. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).