Case Name: PARIS L. TAYLOR, Appellant, v. Manfred (Fred) MAASS, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1994-02-02
Citations: 126 Or. App. 269
Docket Number: 93C12083; CA A80771
Parties: PARIS L. TAYLOR, Appellant, v. Manfred (Fred) MAASS, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 126
Pages: 269–269

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted January 10,
affirmed February 2, 1994
PARIS L. TAYLOR, Appellant, v. Manfred (Fred) MAASS, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, Respondent.
(93C12083; CA A80771)
866 P2d 526
Garrett A. Richardson argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Multnomah Defenders.
Youlee Y. You argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.
Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and Riggs, Judge, and Durham, Judge pro tempore.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Affirmed. Allen v. Maass, 124 Or App 195, 859 P2d 1205 (1993).