Case Name: F. R. Patch Manufacturing Company, respondent, v. William A. Gahagan Company et al., appellants
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1921-09-30
Citations: 93 N.J. Eq. 223
Docket Number: 
Parties: F. R. Patch Manufacturing Company, respondent, v. William A. Gahagan Company et al., appellants.
Judges: For affirmance — Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalis oil, Black, Katzenbach, Heppeni-ieimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Bus-kirk — 14.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 93
Pages: 223–223

Head Matter:
F. R. Patch Manufacturing Company, respondent, v. William A. Gahagan Company et al., appellants.
[Decided September 30th, 1921.]
-On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Griffin, whose opinion is reported in 98 N. J. Eq. 7-8.
Mr. Leon. Abbeit. fox the respondent.
Mr. Robert Carey, for the appellants.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Griffin.
For affirmance — Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalis oil, Black, Katzenbach, Heppeni-ieimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Bus-kirk — 14.
For reversal — None.