Case Name: Robert J. ALMOND, as natural father, natural guardian and next of friend of Joseph Robert Almond and Robert John Almond, Jr., minors, Petitioner, v. Roger NOBLE, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Joy E. Noble, Respondent; Robert J. ALMOND, as natural father, natural guardian and next of friend of Joseph Robert Almond and Robert John Almond, Jr., minors, Appellant, v. Roger NOBLE, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Joy E. Noble, et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1976-07-23
Citations: 336 So. 2d 696
Docket Number: Nos. 76-435, 76-560
Parties: Robert J. ALMOND, as natural father, natural guardian and next of friend of Joseph Robert Almond and Robert John Almond, Jr., minors, Petitioner, v. Roger NOBLE, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Joy E. Noble, Respondent. Robert J. ALMOND, as natural father, natural guardian and next of friend of Joseph Robert Almond and Robert John Almond, Jr., minors, Appellant, v. Roger NOBLE, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Joy E. Noble, et al., Appellees.
Judges: WALDEN, CROSS, and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 336
Pages: 696–697

Head Matter:
Robert J. ALMOND, as natural father, natural guardian and next of friend of Joseph Robert Almond and Robert John Almond, Jr., minors, Petitioner, v. Roger NOBLE, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Joy E. Noble, Respondent. Robert J. ALMOND, as natural father, natural guardian and next of friend of Joseph Robert Almond and Robert John Almond, Jr., minors, Appellant, v. Roger NOBLE, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Joy E. Noble, et al., Appellees.
Nos. 76-435, 76-560.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
July 23, 1976.
Rehearing Denied Sept. 9, 1976.
Leonard Robbins of Abrams, Anton, Robbins, Resnick & Schneider, Hollywood, for petitioner/appellant.
Jack E. London of the Law Office of Jack E. London, Hollywood, for respondent/ appellee-Noble.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Petiton for Writ of Certiorari in Case No. 76-435 and Interlocutory Appeal in Case No. 76-560 were previously consolidated. Appellee's motion to quash the interlocutory appeal was deferred until disposition of the petition for writ of certiorari. Upon a review of the briefs and record, we determine that the trial judge correctly denied petitioner's motion to intervene and file amendment to complaint.
The Petition for Writ of Certiorari in Case No. 76-435 is denied. Appellee's Motion to Quash Interlocutory Appeal in Case No. 76-560 is granted.
The trial court is affirmed.
WALDEN, CROSS, and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur.