Case Name: Bobby Bernard BRADSHAW, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2014-10-14
Citations: 148 So. 3d 831
Docket Number: No. 1D14-0724
Parties: Bobby Bernard BRADSHAW, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: VAN NORTWICK, PADOVANO, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 148
Pages: 831–831

Head Matter:
Bobby Bernard BRADSHAW, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D14-0724.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Oct. 14, 2014.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Office of the Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Bobby Bradshaw seeks review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) of the judgment of and sentence entered against him on one count each of sale and possession of cocaine, in violation of sections 893.13(l)(a)(l), and 893.13(6)(a), Florida Statutes, respectively, following his open plea of nolo contendere. Our review of the record reveals only one reversible error: the imposition in the written sentence of a $100 "Appointed Counsel Attorney Fee," pursuant to section 938.29, Florida Statutes. The trial court failed to inform the defendant, as required by the statute, of his right to a hearing to dispute the amount of the indigent legal assistance lien created by the imposition of the cost of defense. See § 938.29(l)(a) and (6), Fla. Stat.; Sharpe v. State, 115 So.3d 1021, 1022 (Fla. 1st-DCA 2013); Colson v. State, 114 So.3d 415, 417 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013); Youman v. State, 112 So.3d 693, 694 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013); DeSalvo v. State, 107 So.3d 1185, 1186-87 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).
Accordingly, we reverse the $100 Appointed Counsel Attorney Fee. On remand, the trial court may reimpose the fee if it follows the correct procedure in doing so. In all other respects, the judgment and sentence are affirmed.
VAN NORTWICK, PADOVANO, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.