Case Name: A. McInturff et al. v. The City of Hutchinson et al.
Court: Kansas Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Kansas
Decision Date: 1906-11-10
Citations: 74 Kan. 898
Docket Number: No. 15,160
Parties: A. McInturff et al. v. The City of Hutchinson et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Kansas Reports
Volume: 74
Pages: 898–899

Head Matter:
A. McInturff et al. v. The City of Hutchinson et al.
No. 15,160.
(87 Pac. 887.)
Error from Reno district court; Peter J. Galle, judge.
Opinion filed November 10, 1906.
Affirmed.
George A. Vandeveer, and F. L. Martin, for plaintiffs in error; Hettinger Bros., of counsel.
A. C. Malloy, for defendant in error the City of Hutchinson, and Prigg & Williams for defendant in error the Kansas Bitulithic Company.

Opinion:
Per Curiam,:
This was a suit to enjoin the performance of a contract to pave a part of 'a street in the city of Hutchinson. The contract is similar in its provisions to the one involved in Bunker v. Hutchinson, ante, p. 651. That case was disposed of on a demurrer to plaintiff's petition, while in this case a temporary injunction was refused after a hearing. The decision in the Bunker case fairly covers the legal propositions in this case, and nothing is found in the testimony which takes it out of the rule of that decision.
The judgment is therefore affirmed.