Case Name: CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST AND, SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND, and Howard McDougall, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. KROGER COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-02-02
Citations: 241 F.3d 842
Docket Number: No. 99-2257, 99-3014
Parties: CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST AND, SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND, and Howard McDougall, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. KROGER COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WOOD, Jr., COFFEY, RIPPLE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 241
Pages: 842–842

Head Matter:
CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST AND, SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND, and Howard McDougall, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. KROGER COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 99-2257, 99-3014.
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Argued Feb. 17, 2000.
Decided Feb. 2, 2001.
Before WOOD, Jr., COFFEY, RIPPLE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
The court, on its own motion, corrects an error in the text of the original opinion. See Central States, Areas Pension Fund v. Kroger, 226 F.3d 903 (7th Cir.2000). On page 910 of the published opinion, column 2, line 6, the term "de novo" ought to read "deferentially." As the remainder of the court's discussion makes clear, the correct standard was applied in the opinion and this slip of the pen did not impact the court's analysis or the result in the case.