Case Name: In the Interest of H.S., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1994-08-11
Citations: 640 So. 2d 1238
Docket Number: No. 93-1575
Parties: In the Interest of H.S., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: BARFIELD, MINER and MICKLE, JJ„ concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 640
Pages: 1238–1239

Head Matter:
In the Interest of H.S., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 93-1575.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Aug. 11, 1994.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Lynn A. Williams, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Thomas Falkinburg and Amelia L. Beisner, Asst. Attys. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellant, after pleading nolo conten-dere to the charge of burglary of a dwelling, challenges a subsequent trial court order directing her to pay $7,500 in restitution. We reverse in part and remand for further proceedings.
The amount of restitution ordered to be paid for a native American ceremonial pipe which was taken is not supported by the evidence. We accordingly reverse and remand for another hearing to determine the amount of restitution to be ordered for this item. In all other respects, the order on appeal is affirmed.
Reversed in part and remanded.
BARFIELD, MINER and MICKLE, JJ" concur.
. Appellant's liability was joint and several with that of two co-defendants. See Wilson v. State, 640 So.2d 1238 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) and Teasley v. State, 640 So.2d 1239 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).