Case Name: Eunice E. Thomas et al., Respondents, v. City of New York, Defendant, and Mine Safety Appliances Co., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1977-12-01
Citations: 60 A.D.2d 514
Docket Number: 
Parties: Eunice E. Thomas et al., Respondents, v City of New York, Defend ant, and Mine Safety Appliances Co., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 60
Pages: 514–515

Head Matter:
Eunice E. Thomas et al., Respondents, v City of New York, Defend ant, and Mine Safety Appliances Co., Appellant.

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on February 8, 1977, inter alia, denying the motion of defendant Mine Safety Appliances Co. for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The court at Special Term denied appellant's motion for summary judgment based on the affirmative defense of the Statute of Limitations. Our affirmance indicates that such affirmative defense as respects the plaintiff widow will be tried along with the other issues. (Cf. Bannon v Bannon, 270 NY 484.) Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Capozzoli, Lane and Markewich, JJ.