Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hassan Genell HINES, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-10-03
Citations: 698 F. App'x 114
Docket Number: No. 17-6968
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hassan Genell HINES, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 698
Pages: 114–114

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hassan Genell HINES, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 17-6968
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: September 28, 2017
Decided: October 3, 2017
Hassan Genell Hines, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Fesak, Stephen Aubry West, Assistant United States Attorneys, Michael Gordon James, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:-
Hassan Genell Hines appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion as moot. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Hines's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, Hines has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED