Case Name: GROCERY MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION, et al., Petitioners v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent Growth Energy, Intervenor
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-01-15
Citations: 704 F.3d 1005
Docket Number: Nos. 10-1380, 10-1414, 11-1002, 11-1046, 11-1072, 11-1086
Parties: GROCERY MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION, et al., Petitioners v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent Growth Energy, Intervenor.
Judges: Before: SENTELLE, Chief Judge; HENDERSON, ROGERS, TATEL, GARLAND BROWN, GRIFFITH, and KAVANAUGH , Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 704
Pages: 1005–1008

Head Matter:
GROCERY MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION, et al., Petitioners v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent Growth Energy, Intervenor.
Nos. 10-1380, 10-1414, 11-1002, 11-1046, 11-1072, 11-1086.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Jan. 15, 2013.
Before: SENTELLE, Chief Judge; HENDERSON, ROGERS, TATEL, GARLAND BROWN, GRIFFITH, and KAVANAUGH , Circuit Judges.
Circuit Judge Garland did not participate in this matter.
Circuit Judge Kavanaugh would grant the petitions. A statement by Circuit Judge Kava-naugh dissenting from the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc is attached.

Opinion:
ORDER
The petition of the American Petroleum Institute and the Food Petitioners for rehearing en banc; the petition of the Engine Products Group for rehearing en banc; and the petition of American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers and International Liquid Terminals Association for rehearing en banc, and the responses to the petitions were circulated to the full court, and a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges eligible to participate did not vote in favor of the petitions. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is
ORDERED that the petitions be denied.