Case Name: Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, Appellant, and Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, Intervening Appellant, v. Public Utility Commission, Appellee, and The Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania, and The Philadelphia Electric Company, Intervening Appellees
Court: Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1971-04-13
Citations: 2 Pa. Commw. 68
Docket Number: 
Parties: Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, Appellant, and Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, Intervening Appellant, v. Public Utility Commission, Appellee, and The Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania, and The Philadelphia Electric Company, Intervening Appellees.
Judges: before President Judge Bowman and Judges Crumlish, Jr., Kramer, Wilkinson, Jr., Manderino, Mencer and Rogers.
Reporter: Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court Reports
Volume: 2
Pages: 68–70

Head Matter:
Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, Appellant, and Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, Intervening Appellant, v. Public Utility Commission, Appellee, and The Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania, and The Philadelphia Electric Company, Intervening Appellees.
Argued February 11, 1971,
before President Judge Bowman and Judges Crumlish, Jr., Kramer, Wilkinson, Jr., Manderino, Mencer and Rogers.
. J., F.reedley, Hunsicker, Jr., with him Lewis H. Tan Dusen, Jr., ■ David P, Bruton, and Drinker, Biddle & .Beath,)Tor. appellant Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority.
Herbert G. Zahn, Assistant Attorney General, with him Bobert W. Gunliffe,. Deputy Attorney General, for intervening appellant.
_ Man B. Squires, Assistant Counsel,, with him Edward Munce, Acting Counsel, for Public Utility Commission, appellee. .
E. Everett Mather, with him John B. King and Donald F. _ Clarke, for Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania, intervening appellee..
Donald Blanken, with him Eugene J. Bradley and Vincent- P. McDevitt, for Philadelphia Electric Company, intervening appellee.
April 13, 1971:

Opinion:
Opinion by
Judge Wilkinson,
This case. was. consolidated for argument with the appeal of the City of Philadelphia in No. 996 Transfer Docket 1970. On argument, all parties agreed that the ultimate result of both appeals would bé controlled by the decision in the City of Philadelphia appeal. Accordingly, the motion to quash the appeal of SEPTA has been dismissed for the reasons set forth in the appeal of the City of Philadelphia at No. 996 Transfer Docket 1970, and we enter the following
OEDEE
The appeal of Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority is sustained and paragraphs 21 and 22 of the Commission's order dated June 1, 1970, are vacated and set aside and the City of Philadelphia is hereby relieved of any duty to reimburse Philadelphia Electric Company or The Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania 75% of the costs herein referred to.
Motion to quash appeal dismissed.