Case Name: JOYCE et ux, Appellants, v. PEARCE et al, Respondents
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1982-03-15
Citations: 56 Or. App. 398
Docket Number: No. 18-326, CA A21408
Parties: JOYCE et ux, Appellants, v. PEARCE et al, Respondents.
Judges: Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, Joseph, Chief Judge, and Young, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 56
Pages: 398–399

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted February 12,
affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded with instructions March 15,
reconsideration denied April 29, petition for review denied May 18, 1982 (293 Or 146)
JOYCE et ux, Appellants, v. PEARCE et al, Respondents.
(No. 18-326, CA A21408)
641 P2d 1170
C. E. Hodges, Jr., Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellants.
Ivan J. Vesely, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents.
Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, Joseph, Chief Judge, and Young, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
This is a quiet title proceeding in which the trial court quieted title to the property in question in defendants. Plaintiffs appeal, assigning as error, inter alia, the trial court's failure to award them $848.11, together with interest thereon, from defendants in repayment of certain taxes paid on the disputed property. The defendants concede that they are obligated to repay to plaintiffs a prorated sum, the exact amount of which they do not acknowledge. In light of defendants' concession, the decree is reversed as to that matter only, and the cause is remanded with instructions to award plaintiffs a prorated sum as restitution for monies expended in paying taxes on the property, the exact amount of said award to be computed by the trial court. In all other respects, the decree is affirmed.