Case Name: Randy and Vickie POHLMANN, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. William NEEL, Fiducial Franchises, Inc., and Neelco, Inc., Defendants/Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2011-07-05
Citations: 342 S.W.3d 928
Docket Number: No. ED 95247
Parties: Randy and Vickie POHLMANN, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. William NEEL, Fiducial Franchises, Inc., and Neelco, Inc., Defendants/Respondents.
Judges: Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 342
Pages: 928–929

Head Matter:
Randy and Vickie POHLMANN, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. William NEEL, Fiducial Franchises, Inc., and Neelco, Inc., Defendants/Respondents.
No. ED 95247.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
July 5, 2011.
John Campbell, Erich Vieth, St. Louis, MO, for appellants.
Jill R. Rembusch, Thomas E. Manns, St. Louis, MO, Arthur L. Pressman, Boston, MA, for respondents.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The plaintiffs appeal from the trial court's denial of their motion for class-action certification. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have fur nished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(5).