Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Larry CHAPMAN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-05-25
Citations: 131 F. App'x 961
Docket Number: No. 05-6047
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Larry CHAPMAN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 131
Pages: 961–961

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Larry CHAPMAN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-6047.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 19, 2005.
Decided May 25, 2005.
Larry Chapman, Appellant pro se. Kevin Frank McDonald, Office of the United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, W. Walter Wilkins, Office of the United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Larry Chapman appeals the district court's order denying his motion for production of documents. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Chapman, No. CR-99-209 (D.S.C. Oct. 29, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
We decline to address the issue with respect to United States v. Booker, - U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), as Chapman raises it for the first time in his informal brief and it is inapplicable to his case.