Case Name: All New York Auto Corp. et al., Respondents, v. Renault, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1961-12-14
Citations: 15 A.D.2d 467
Docket Number: 
Parties: All New York Auto Corp. et al., Respondents, v. Renault, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 15
Pages: 467–467

Head Matter:
All New York Auto Corp. et al., Respondents, v. Renault, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Opinion:
The essence of the action is the claimed substantial legal damage sustained by the plaintiffs by reason of the expenditure of vast sums in furtherance of an alleged franchise agreement, which plaintiffs assert was wrongfully terminated by defendant. The information sought is essential to defendant in preparing its ease for trial. (City Messenger Sen. of Hollywood v. Powers Photoengraving Co., 7 A D 2d 213.) Concur — Rabin, J. P., McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.;