Case Name: Brandon L. WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2019-02-19
Citations: 567 S.W.3d 305
Docket Number: No. ED 106308
Parties: Brandon L. WILSON, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Roy L. Richter, P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., Angela T. Quigless, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 567
Pages: 305–306

Head Matter:
Brandon L. WILSON, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 106308
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Filed: February 19, 2019
Kristina S. Olson, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO. 63101, for appellant.
Richard A. Starnes, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO. 65102, for respondent.
Before Roy L. Richter, P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., Angela T. Quigless, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Brandon L. Wilson ("Movant") appeals from the judgment of the motion court, denying his Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief motion following an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, Movant argues trial counsel was ineffective for introducing evidence that the victim identified Movant from a photographic lineup, and for eliciting evidence of Movant's prior arrests. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find the motion court did not clearly err. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to MO. R. CIV. P. 84.16(b) (2018).