Case Name: UNITED STATES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hilario Mateo Pedro Antonio SANCHEZ, aka Gustavo Sanchez-Lopez, aka Sayas, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-12-20
Citations: 462 F. App'x 698
Docket Number: No. 10-50532
Parties: UNITED STATES, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Hilario Mateo Pedro Antonio SANCHEZ, aka Gustavo Sanchez-Lopez, aka Sayas, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 462
Pages: 698–698

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Hilario Mateo Pedro Antonio SANCHEZ, aka Gustavo Sanchez-Lopez, aka Sayas, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 10-50532.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 19, 2011.
Filed Dec. 20, 2011.
David Michael Herzog, Assistant U.S., Michael J. Raphael, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los An-geles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Robison D. Harley, Jr., Esquire, Santa Ana, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Hilario Mateo Pedro Ant Sanchez, pro se.
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Hilario Sanchez appeals his conviction by guilty plea and sentence for conspiracy to harbor and conceal illegal aliens in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(l)(A)(v)(I). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Sanchez's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Sanchez with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. We dismiss in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2000).
Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.