Case Name: Adolph G. Corrente, Respondent, v. Tuthill Petroleum, Inc., Appellant. (Action No. 1.); Lydia Armocida, Respondent, v. Tuthill Petroleum, Inc., Appellant. (Action No. 2.); Nicholas J. Spano, Respondent, v. Tuthill Petroleum, Inc., Appellant. (Action No. 3.)
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1984-08-06
Citations: 104 A.D.2d 355
Docket Number: 
Parties: Adolph G. Corrente, Respondent, v Tuthill Petroleum, Inc., Appellant. (Action No. 1.) Lydia Armocida, Respondent, v Tuthill Petroleum, Inc., Appellant. (Action No. 2.) Nicholas J. Spano, Respondent, v Tuthill Petroleum, Inc., Appellant. (Action No. 3.)
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 104
Pages: 355–355

Head Matter:
Adolph G. Corrente, Respondent, v Tuthill Petroleum, Inc., Appellant. (Action No. 1.) Lydia Armocida, Respondent, v Tuthill Petroleum, Inc., Appellant. (Action No. 2.) Nicholas J. Spano, Respondent, v Tuthill Petroleum, Inc., Appellant. (Action No. 3.)

Opinion:
— Judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cohalan, J.), entered December 9, 1983, affirmed. No opinion.
Cross appeal by plaintiff Spano dismissed since it was not properly perfected in accordance with the rules of this court (see Cooper v Bosse, 85 AD2d 616; 22 NYCRR 670.8).
Plaintiff Spano is awarded one bill of costs. Titone, J. P., Gibbons, Brown and Niehoff, JJ., concur.