Case Name: Jos. SCHLITZ BREWING CO., Appellant, v. E. A. JOHNSON and A. H. Gould, Doing Business as Chattanooga Beer Distributors, Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1941-11-07
Citations: 123 F.2d 1016
Docket Number: No. 8733
Parties: Jos. SCHLITZ BREWING CO., Appellant, v. E. A. JOHNSON and A. H. Gould, Doing Business as Chattanooga Beer Distributors, Appellees.
Judges: Before HICKS, ALLEN, and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 123
Pages: 1016–1017

Head Matter:
Jos. SCHLITZ BREWING CO., Appellant, v. E. A. JOHNSON and A. H. Gould, Doing Business as Chattanooga Beer Distributors, Appellees.
No. 8733.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Nov. 7, 1941.
Corrigan & Backus and Francis H. Parson, all of Milwaukee, Wis., John A. Chambliss, of Chattanooga, Tenn., and Kenneth F. Webster, of Milwaukee, Wis., for appellant.
Phil B. Whitaker, W. C. Smith, and W. M. Haynes, all of Chattanooga, Tenn., for appellees.
Before HICKS, ALLEN, and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
It appearing from consideration of the record, oral argument and briefs in this cause that the judgment of the District Court entered on the verdict of a jury was correct, for the reasons stated by the District Court in its opinion filed on motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial (33 F.Supp. 176), the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.