Case Name: Russell WENGLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1992-07-21
Citations: 832 S.W.2d 339
Docket Number: No. 60579
Parties: Russell WENGLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 832
Pages: 339–339

Head Matter:
Russell WENGLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 60579.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
July 21, 1992.
Emily N. Blood, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Russell Wengler, appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
We have reviewed the transcript, the legal file and the briefs of the parties and find that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. As we further find that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a full opinion, we affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our holding.