Case Name: Ulyses BLANCH v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1926-01-20
Citations: 279 S.W. 1117
Docket Number: No. 9820
Parties: Ulyses BLANCH v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 279
Pages: 1117–1117

Head Matter:
Ulyses BLANCH v. STATE.
(No. 9820.)
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Jan. 20, 1926.)
J. T. Buckley, of Longview, for appellant.
Sam D. Stinson, State’s Atty., of Austin, and Nat Gentry, Jr., Asst. State’s Atty., of Tyler, for the State.

Opinion:
HAWKINS, J.
Conviction is for assault with intent to murder. Punishment is two years in the penitentiary. The record is without objections to the charge of the court, and, contains no bills of exception. The only matter for review is whether the evidence supports the verdict and judgment. It appears unnecessary to detail the evidence. The case turned upon the question of the identity of appellant as the party doing the shooting upon which the prosecution was predicated. If believed, the evidence of the state was sufficient to authorize the jury in concluding that appellant was the party who committed the assault. The conflict in the evidence has been settled in favor of the state. We are unauthorized to disturb the verdict under the facts before us. The judgment is affirmed.