Case Name: Jerome Abrams, Respondent, v. Luxor Lincoln-Mercury, Inc., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1958-02-06
Citations: 11 Misc. 2d 875
Docket Number: 
Parties: Jerome Abrams, Respondent, v. Luxor Lincoln-Mercury, Inc., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 11
Pages: 875–875

Head Matter:
Jerome Abrams, Respondent, v. Luxor Lincoln-Mercury, Inc., Appellant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
February 6, 1958.
Daniel Rosen for appellant.
I. Jonas Speciner and Sol Calvin King for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The attempt by plaintiff to establish that defendant had allegedly defrauded a purchaser [of an automobile] other than the plaintiff and the testimony and colloquy that ensued with respect thereto, as well as other gratuitous remarks by the court concerning the alleged reason for objections by defendant's counsel, constitute prejudicial error.
In addition, defendant was entitled to an unequivocal charge that absent one of the elements of the alleged fraud, a cause of action in fraud was not made out.
The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellant.
Hecht, J. P., Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ., concur.
Judgment reversed, etc.