Case Name: CINCINNATI MILACRON, LTD., Appellant, v. M/V AMERICAN LEGEND, her engines, boilers, etc., and United States Lines, Inc., Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1986-11-06
Citations: 804 F.2d 837
Docket Number: No. 85-1183
Parties: CINCINNATI MILACRON, LTD., Appellant, v. M/V AMERICAN LEGEND, her engines, boilers, etc., and United States Lines, Inc., Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 804
Pages: 837–837

Head Matter:
CINCINNATI MILACRON, LTD., Appellant, v. M/V AMERICAN LEGEND, her engines, boilers, etc., and United States Lines, Inc., Appellees.
No. 85-1183.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Argued Oct. 7, 1986.
Decided Nov. 6, 1986.
James D. Skeen (David W. Skeen, Constable, Alexander, Daneker & Skeen, on brief), for appellant.
John H. West, III (Roann Nichols, Ober, Kaler, Grimes & Shriver, on brief), for appellees.
Before WINTER, RUSSELL, WIDENER, HALL, PHILLIPS, SPROUSE, ERVIN, CHAPMAN, WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, sitting en banc.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
On rehearing of this appeal en banc, the judgment of the district court is affirmed for reasons stated in the dissent to the superseded panel decision. See Cincinnati Milacron, Ltd. v. M/V American Legend, 784 F.2d 1161, 1166 (4th Cir.1986) (dissenting opinion).
Chief Judge Winter and Judge Ervin dissent and would reverse for reasons stated in the superseded opinion for the panel majority. See id. at 1162.
AFFIRMED.