Case Name: Norberto QUITO, Appellant, v. COMPANIA DE VAPORES OCEAN BREEZE S.A. and Ulysses Cruise, Inc., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1999-10-27
Citations: 743 So. 2d 1178
Docket Number: No. 98-947
Parties: Norberto QUITO, Appellant, v. COMPANIA DE VAPORES OCEAN BREEZE S.A. and Ulysses Cruise, Inc., Appellees.
Judges: Before COPE, GREEN, and SORONDO, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 743
Pages: 1178–1180

Head Matter:
Norberto QUITO, Appellant, v. COMPANIA DE VAPORES OCEAN BREEZE S.A. and Ulysses Cruise, Inc., Appellees.
No. 98-947.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 27, 1999.
Charles R. Lipcon, Miami; Cooper & Wolfe, P.A., and Sharon L. Wolfe, and Nancy C. Ciampa, Miami, for appellant.
James M. Walker, Miami; Hicks & Anderson, P.A. and James E. Tribble, Tallahassee, for appellee.
Before COPE, GREEN, and SORONDO, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Our review of the record leads us to the conclusion that the jury's verdict and judgment are fully supported by competent evidence; and that the claimed error was harmless at best. See § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (1995); Stecher v. Pomeroy, 253 So.2d 421, 422 (Fla.1971); Chrysler v. Department of Prof'l Reg., 627 So.2d 31, 34-35 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Scurry v. State, 490 So.2d 223, 224 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Arlen House E., Inc. v. Lowenstern, 364 So.2d 87, 88 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). We therefore affirm the judgment under review.
Affirmed.
GREEN and SORONDO, JJ., concur.