Case Name: Duck v. Liberty Mills, Inc., et al.
Court: Mississippi Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Mississippi
Decision Date: 1963-02-18
Citations: 246 Miss. 434
Docket Number: No. 42589
Parties: Duck v. Liberty Mills, Inc., et al.
Judges: McGehee, G. J., and Ethridge, Rodgers and Jones, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Mississippi Reports
Volume: 246
Pages: 434–436

Head Matter:
Duck v. Liberty Mills, Inc., et al.
No. 42589
February 18, 1963
149 So. 2d 849
Calvin B. Wells, Natchez, for appellant.
Daniel, Coker & Horton, Jackson, for appellees.

Opinion:
Gillespie, J.
(Hn 1) The attorney-referee, the full commission, and the circuit court all denied compensation to appellant. The question was one of fact whether appellant sustained her injuries on the- job o.r elsewhere. The testimony was in conflict and there was substantial evidence to support the commission's finding against claimant. The substantial evidence rule has been stated and applied so many times, as evidenced by tbe long list of cases cited in Dnnn's Workmen's Compensation, Sec. 179, 1963 Cumulative Supplement, that further illustration of tbe. rule is not needed. Tbe order of tbe commission is affirmed.
Affirmed.
McGehee, G. J., and Ethridge, Rodgers and Jones, JJ., concur.