Case Name: Joseph Nicolatte v. The State
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1919-04-23
Citations: 85 Tex. Crim. 245
Docket Number: No. 5375
Parties: Joseph Nicolatte v. The State.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Criminal Reports
Volume: 85
Pages: 245–245

Head Matter:
Joseph Nicolatte v. The State.
No. 5375.
Decided April 23, 1919.
Robbery—Statement of Facts—practice on Appeal.
In the absence of a statement of fact and a bill of exceptions to the action of the court, overruling the application for a continuance and motion for new trial, judgment below must be affirmed.
Appeal from the District Court of Bexar. Tried below before the Hon. W. S. Anderson, judge.
Appeal from a conviction of robbery with firearms; penalty, ten years imprisonment in the penitentary.
The opinion states the ease.
No brief on file for appellant.
E. A. Berry, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Opinion:
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
Appellant was convicted of robbery with firearms, his punishment being assessed at ten years confinement in the penitentiary.
Application for continuance contained in the record cannot be considered, first, because no statement of facts accompanies the transcript, and, second, there was no bill of exceptions reversed to the action of the court overruling the application.
The motion for new trial suggests some errors in regard to the court's charge as given, and the refusal to give appellant's requested instructions. In the condition of the record the matters urged in the motion for new trial cannot be considered or revised.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.