Case Name: JOHN TRICOLO, RESPONDENT, v. DONATO CENTALANZA AND RAFFAELE CENTALANZA, APPELLANTS
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1925-05-18
Citations: 101 N.J.L. 570
Docket Number: 
Parties: JOHN TRICOLO, RESPONDENT, v. DONATO CENTALANZA AND RAFFAELE CENTALANZA, APPELLANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 101
Pages: 570–570

Head Matter:
JOHN TRICOLO, RESPONDENT, v. DONATO CENTALANZA AND RAFFAELE CENTALANZA, APPELLANTS.
Argued March 20, 1925
Decided May 18, 1925.
■ Por the appellants, Thomas Brunetto.
Por the respondent, Gaetano Belfaito.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Our examination of this case has led up to the conclusion that a right result was reached in the court below upon the facts, and, therefore, the judgment under review herein should be affirmed.
For affirmance — -The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.