Case Name: Billy Joe BEASLEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-11-13
Citations: 569 So. 2d 525
Docket Number: No. 90-838
Parties: Billy Joe BEASLEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before NESBITT, COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 569
Pages: 525–525

Head Matter:
Billy Joe BEASLEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 90-838.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 13, 1990.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Elliot H. Scherker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Jacqueline M. Valdespino, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before NESBITT, COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The State confesses error with respect to the sentence imposed on defendant Beasley after revocation of Beasley's probation. The State and the defense agree that the sentence could not exceed the one-cell increase provided by Rule 3.701(d)(14), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. See Ree v. State, 565 So.2d 1329, 1331 (Fla.1990) (opinion on rehearing). The parties disagree on what was the maximum of the permitted range pursuant to Rule 3.701(d)(14). This appears to be attributable to scoring or computational errors in the guidelines scoresheet. We therefore reverse the sentencing order and remand for resentencing pursuant to Rule 3.701(d)(14) on a corrected scoresheet.