Case Name: Adele Mancini and Vincenzo Mancini, Respondents, v. John Unso, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of John Unso & Son, and Others, Defendants, and Wilson & Co., Inc., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1941-11-24
Citations: 263 A.D. 742
Docket Number: 
Parties: Adele Mancini and Vincenzo Mancini, Respondents, v. John Unso, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of John Unso & Son, and Others, Defendants, and Wilson & Co., Inc., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 263
Pages: 742–742

Head Matter:
Adele Mancini and Vincenzo Mancini, Respondents, v. John Unso, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of John Unso & Son, and Others, Defendants, and Wilson & Co., Inc., Appellant.

Opinion:
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained as the result of consumption of pork infected with trichina, and for loss of services and for expenses, order, in so far as it grants plaintiffs' motion for examination before trial of defendant Wilson & Co., Inc., modified on the law by striking therefrom item " c " with respect to the scope of the examination of said defendant, and by striking from item " b " the word " might " and inserting in place thereof the words " was intended to." As so modified, the order, in so far as appealed from, is affirmed, without costs; the examination to proceed on five days notice. There is no allegation in the complaint which would make item " c " a material subject of inquiry. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.