Case Name: John Edward INMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-11-16
Citations: 154 F. App'x 355
Docket Number: No. 05-1377
Parties: John Edward INMAN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 154
Pages: 355–355

Head Matter:
John Edward INMAN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 05-1377.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 2, 2005.
Decided: Nov. 16, 2005.
Charles K. McCotter, Jr., Mccotter, Ashton & Smith, P.A., New Bern, North Carolina, for Appellant. Frank D. Whitney, United States Attorney, Anne M. Hayes, Neal I. Fowler, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
John Edward Inman appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil action under the Federal Tort Claims Act for injuries he received in a single vehicle accident on a national forest road. The district court concluded it lacked subject matter jurisdiction under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and the discretionary function and independent contractor exceptions to the FTCA. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Inman v. United States, No. CA-03-49-4-H (E.D.N.C. Feb. 9, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED