Case Name: Bar Association of Greater Cleveland v. Bogomolny
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1984-04-18
Citations: 10 Ohio St. 3d 110
Docket Number: D.D. No. 83-24
Parties: Bar Association of Greater Cleveland v. Bogomolny.
Judges: Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J.P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 10
Pages: 110–111

Head Matter:
Bar Association of Greater Cleveland v. Bogomolny.
[Cite as Bar Assn, of Greater Cleveland v. Bogomolny (1984), 10 Ohio St. 3d 110.]
(D.D. No. 83-24
Decided April 18, 1984.)
Messrs. Walter, Haverfield, Buescher & Chockley, Mr. F. Wilson Chockley, Jr., Mr. Edward J. Maher, McDonald, Hopkins & Hardy Co., L.P.A., and Mr. Timothy D. McDonald, for relator.
Messrs. Calfee, Halter & Griswold, Mr. Michael L. Miller and Mr. Richard J. Cusick, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Under the facts presented, a finding of guilty on two counts of violating the Sherman Act constitutes misconduct under DR 1-102(A)(3) and (A)(4). The fact that the respondent entered a plea of nolo contendere to the allegations makes it no less a violation under the Disciplinary Rules.
Having reviewed the evidence and the objections filed on behalf of the respondent, this court determines that the respondent violated the aforestated Disciplinary Rules. Accordingly, we concur in the recommendation of the board of commissioners.
Therefore, it is the judgment of this court that respondent, Richard Joseph Bogomolny, be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law.
Judgment accordingly.
Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J.P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.