Case Name: The FORT BELKNAP INDIAN COMMUNITY OF the FORT BELKNAP INDIAN RESERVATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF MONTANA, Robert L. Robinson, individually and as Administrator, Gambling Control Division, Department of Justice, State of Montana; Stan Stephens, individually and as Governor, State of Montana; Marc Racicot, individually and as Attorney General, State of Montana, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1996-06-07
Citations: 84 F.3d 1222
Docket Number: No. 94-35126
Parties: The FORT BELKNAP INDIAN COMMUNITY OF the FORT BELKNAP INDIAN RESERVATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF MONTANA, Robert L. Robinson, individually and as Administrator, Gambling Control Division, Department of Justice, State of Montana; Stan Stephens, individually and as Governor, State of Montana; Marc Racicot, individually and as Attorney General, State of Montana, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: BEEZER and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges, and ORRICK, Senior District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 84
Pages: 1222–1222

Head Matter:
The FORT BELKNAP INDIAN COMMUNITY OF the FORT BELKNAP INDIAN RESERVATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF MONTANA, Robert L. Robinson, individually and as Administrator, Gambling Control Division, Department of Justice, State of Montana; Stan Stephens, individually and as Governor, State of Montana; Marc Racicot, individually and as Attorney General, State of Montana, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 94-35126.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
June 7, 1996.
James L. Vogel, Hardin, Montana, for plaintiff-appellant.
Joseph P. Mazurek, Attorney General, and Deanne L. Sandholm, Assistant Attorney General, Helena, Montana, for defendants-appellees.
Before: BEEZER and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges, and ORRICK, Senior District Judge.
The Honorable William H. Orrick, Senior United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
ORDER
The judgment of this court, 39 F.3d 1186 (Table), is vacated. For the reasons stated by the Supreme Court in Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida, — U.S.-, 116 S.Ct. 1114, 134 L.Ed.2d 252 (1996), we affirm the judgment of the district court.
AFFIRMED.