Case Name: In the Matter of the Claim of Christopher J. Salo, Respondent. Yvon Mau Wines, Inc., Appellant; John E. Sweeney, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1998-02-26
Citations: 247 A.D.2d 808
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Claim of Christopher J. Salo, Respondent. Yvon Mau Wines, Inc., Appellant; John E. Sweeney, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Judges: Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Carpinello, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 247
Pages: 808–809

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Claim of Christopher J. Salo, Respondent. Yvon Mau Wines, Inc., Appellant; John E. Sweeney, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
[669 NYS2d 405]

Opinion:
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 14, 1996, which ruled that Yvon Mau Wines, Inc. was liable for unemployment insurance contributions on remuneration paid to claimant and those similarly situated.
Claimant was a salesperson for Yvon Mau Wines, Inc. (hereinafter YMW), a wine distributor. Substantial evidence supports the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board's conclusion that YMW exercised sufficient direction and control over the work of claimant and other persons similarly situated to establish their status as YMW's employees and not independent contractors (see, Matter of Rivera [State Line Delivery Serv. — Roberts], 69 NY2d 679, cert denied 481 US 1049). YMW set claimant's commission rate, established his monthly sales goal, paid claimant biweekly as a draw on his commission and continued to do so even when claimant did not earn enough commission to cover his draw. YMW also paid claimant $75 per week for business expenses and covered 50% of claimant's monthly health insurance premium. Additionally, YMW set the price for its wines, provided claimant with sales leads and, after customer orders were placed, handled all shipping and invoicing matters. While a contrary conclusion could be reached on the record evidence, inasmuch as we find substantial evidence to support the Board's decision that an employer-employee relationship exists, it will not be disturbed (see, Matter of Concourse Ophthalmology Assocs. [Roberts], 60 NY2d 734, 736).
Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Carpinello, JJ., concur.
Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.