Case Name: George E. CROW, Appellant, v. OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee; J. E. (Bill) DECKER and George E. Crow, Appellants, v. John KLINGLER, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1950-01-06
Citations: 178 F.2d 404
Docket Number: Nos. 12855, 12936
Parties: George E. CROW, Appellant, v. OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee. J. E. (Bill) DECKER and George E. Crow, Appellants, v. John KLINGLER, Appellee.
Judges: Before McCORD, and WALLER, Circuit Judges, and RICE, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 178
Pages: 404–404

Head Matter:
George E. CROW, Appellant, v. OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee. J. E. (Bill) DECKER and George E. Crow, Appellants, v. John KLINGLER, Appellee.
Nos. 12855, 12936.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
Jan. 6, 1950.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 3, 1950.
J. W. Hassell, Dallas, Tex., F. Neilson Rogers, Sherman, Tex., for appellants.
W. C. Gowan, Dallas, Tex., for appellees.
Before McCORD, and WALLER, Circuit Judges, and RICE, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
These two appeals have been consolidated by the court upon motion of the parties, since they present substantially similar issues of law and fact.
From a careful consideration of the records in both cases, and of each and every specification of error relied upon by appellants, we conclude that no new or novel question is here presented, and that the judgments in both appeals should be affirmed upon authority of McDonald v. Mabee, 243 U.S. 90, 37 S.Ct. 343, 61 L.Ed. 608, L.R.A.1917F, 458, and Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U.S. 714, 24 L.Ed. 565. See also, Simon v. Southern Ry. Co., 236 U.S. 115, 116, 35 S.Ct. 255, 59 L.Ed. 492.