Case Name: Michael I. ROSE, Appellant, v. Rona ROSE, and Leinoff & Lemos, P.A., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2005-04-20
Citations: 898 So. 2d 1216
Docket Number: No. 3D04-405
Parties: Michael I. ROSE, Appellant, v. Rona ROSE, and Leinoff & Lemos, P.A., Appellee.
Judges: Before GREEN, RAMIREZ, and SUAREZ, JJ. :
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 898
Pages: 1216–1216

Head Matter:
Michael I. ROSE, Appellant, v. Rona ROSE, and Leinoff & Lemos, P.A., Appellee.
No. 3D04-405.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 20, 2005.
Martin A. Feigenbaum, Miami, for appellant.
Nancy A. Hass (FtLauderdale), for ap-pellee.
Before GREEN, RAMIREZ, and SUAREZ, JJ. :

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Miller v. Scobie, 152 Fla. 328, 11 So.2d 892, 894 (1943)("We do not deny the right of litigants to settle controversies out of court but any such settlement without the knowledge or notice to counsel and the payment of their fees is fraud on them whether there was an intent to do so or not."); Knott v. Knott, 395 So.2d 1196, 1199 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Young v. Young, 322 So.2d 594, 596 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975).