Case Name: In Re Nomination Paper of Marakay ROGERS, Christina Valente and Carl J. Romanelli as Candidates of an Independent Political Body for Governor, Lieutenant Governor and U.S. Senator in the General Election of November 7, 2006. William R. Caroselli, Fred R. Levin, Daniel J. Anders and Peter D. Winebrake. Appeal of Carl Romanelli
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2006-10-04
Citations: 907 A.2d 503
Docket Number: 
Parties: In Re Nomination Paper of Marakay ROGERS, Christina Valente and Carl J. Romanelli as Candidates of an Independent Political Body for Governor, Lieutenant Governor and U.S. Senator in the General Election of November 7, 2006. William R. Caroselli, Fred R. Levin, Daniel J. Anders and Peter D. Winebrake. Appeal of Carl Romanelli.
Judges: Justice SAYLOR files a dissenting statement.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 907
Pages: 503–504

Head Matter:
In Re Nomination Paper of Marakay ROGERS, Christina Valente and Carl J. Romanelli as Candidates of an Independent Political Body for Governor, Lieutenant Governor and U.S. Senator in the General Election of November 7, 2006. William R. Caroselli, Fred R. Levin, Daniel J. Anders and Peter D. Winebrake. Appeal of Carl Romanelli.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Oct. 4, 2006.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The Order of the Commonwealth Court is hereby AFFIRMED. This order is entered without prejudice to the Appellant to seek review of the pending Order of the Commonwealth Court imposing a final order of costs. In Re Nomination Paper of Ralph Nader, 905 A.2d 450, 457 (2006). We further direct that the Commonwealth Court's final order assessing costs reference by category and amount assessed as well as a statement of rationale behind the imposition of these costs.
Justice SAYLOR files a dissenting statement.