Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wilson MATUTE-PINEDA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-05-14
Citations: 97 F. App'x 148
Docket Number: No. 03-10466
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Wilson MATUTE-PINEDA, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 97
Pages: 148–149

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Wilson MATUTE-PINEDA, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 03-10466.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 10, 2004.
Decided May 14, 2004.
Anne E. Mosher, Esq., Christina M. Cabanillas, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Evo A. DeConcini U.S., Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Enrique R. Gonzales, Nogales, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before CANBY, KOZINSKI and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Wilson Matute-Pineda appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 30-month sen tence for re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Matute-Pineda has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Matute-Pineda has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. We therefore GRANT counsel's motion to withdraw and AFFIRM the district court's judgment.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.