Case Name: Jerome Julius BROWN, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard D. FAIRBANK, Capital One Bank, CEO, DefendantAppellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-08-23
Citations: 538 F. App'x 299
Docket Number: No. 13-1257
Parties: Jerome Julius BROWN, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard D. FAIRBANK, Capital One Bank, CEO, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 538
Pages: 299–299

Head Matter:
Jerome Julius BROWN, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard D. FAIRBANK, Capital One Bank, CEO, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 13-1257.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 9, 2013.
Decided: Aug. 23, 2013.
Jerome Julius Brown, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Jerome Julius Brown, Sr. seeks to appeal the magistrate judge's order denying his motion. The district court previously dismissed his proposed complaint without prejudice. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Brown seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.