Case Name: David Cronin, as Overseer, etc., Respondent, v. Willard F. Stoddard, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1882-01
Citations: 33 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 245
Docket Number: 
Parties: David Cronin, as Overseer, etc., Respondent, v. Willard F. Stoddard, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Supreme Court Reports (Hun)
Volume: 33
Pages: 245–245

Head Matter:
David Cronin, as Overseer, etc., Respondent, v. Willard F. Stoddard, Appellant.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed. Held, that the three rules were sufficiently proved, without the testimony of Luce. The commitment was immaterial and was properly excluded; the other questions in the case are controlled by Cronin v. Gandy (16 Hun, 520).