Case Name: KEY ENTERPRISES OF DELAWARE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VENICE HOSPITAL, Sammett Corporation and Medicare Patient Aids Center, Defendants-Appellees, Gulf Area Diversified Services, et al., Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1992-11-10
Citations: 979 F.2d 806
Docket Number: No. 89-3086
Parties: KEY ENTERPRISES OF DELAWARE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VENICE HOSPITAL, Sammett Corporation and Medicare Patient Aids Center, Defendants-Appellees, Gulf Area Diversified Services, et al., Defendants.
Judges: Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 979
Pages: 806–807

Head Matter:
KEY ENTERPRISES OF DELAWARE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VENICE HOSPITAL, Sammett Corporation and Medicare Patient Aids Center, Defendants-Appellees, Gulf Area Diversified Services, et al., Defendants.
No. 89-3086.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Nov. 10, 1992.
Christopher K. Kay, Michael J. Beaudine, Orlando, Fla., Anthony E. De Resta, Morris, Manning & Martin, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellant.
Herbert T. Schwartz, Reinman, Harrell, Graham, Mitchell & Wattwood, Melbourne, Fla., for Venice Hosp., Medicare Patient AIDS Center.
Lynn Snyder, William G. Kopit, Washington, D.C., for Sammett Corp., Medicare Patient AIDS Center.
William G. Kopit, Florida Hosp. Assoc., Tallahassee, Fla., for appellees.
Senior U.S. Circuit Judge Thomas A. Clark has elected to participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(c).

Opinion:
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.