Case Name: La'Tila D. ABBOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARKETSTAR CORP., Defendant-Appellee, and Phillipe Aquilina; Marketing Werks; Cynthia Snoot; Rosalin H. Hall-Smith; EEOC, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-03-27
Citations: 563 F. App'x 227
Docket Number: No. 13-2442
Parties: La’Tila D. ABBOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARKETSTAR CORP., Defendant-Appellee, and Phillipe Aquilina; Marketing Werks; Cynthia Snoot; Rosalin H. Hall-Smith; EEOC, Defendants.
Judges: Before GREGORY, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 563
Pages: 227–228

Head Matter:
La’Tila D. ABBOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARKETSTAR CORP., Defendant-Appellee, and Phillipe Aquilina; Marketing Werks; Cynthia Snoot; Rosalin H. Hall-Smith; EEOC, Defendants.
No. 13-2442.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 25, 2014.
Decided: March 27, 2014.
La’Tila D. Abbott, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Eugene Blue, Ray, Quinney & Nebeker, PC, Salt Lake City, Utah; Tillman J. Breckenridge, Reed Smith, LLP, Washington, DC; Betty S.W. Graumlich, Robert Miltz Luck, III, Reed Smith, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before GREGORY, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
La'Tila D. Abbott appeals the district court's order dismissing her civil action alleging employment discrimination. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Abbott v. MarketStar, No. 3:13-cv-00143-HEH-MHL, 2013 WL 5561617 (E.D.Va. Oct. 8, 2013). We deny Abbott's pending petitions for mandamus, for a jury trial, and to enjoin a non-party from filing documents in this appeal, and her pending motion to suppress, and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.