Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alick BENNER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-09-15
Citations: 74 F. App'x 825
Docket Number: No. 02-10594; D.C. No. CR-01-05253-OWW
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alick BENNER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 74
Pages: 825–825

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alick BENNER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-10594.
D.C. No. CR-01-05253-OWW.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 8, 2003.
Decided Sept. 15, 2003.
Sherrill LaPrade Carvalho, Esq., United States Attorney’s Office, Fresno, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Carolyn D. Phillips, Esq., Fresno, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before PREGERSON, THOMAS and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Alick Benner appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 57-month sentence imposed for committing assault with a dangerous weapon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 113(a)(3). Benner's attorney has filed a brief and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Benner has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Our review of the Anders brief and our independent review of the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no issues requiring further review. Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.