Case Name: Sue Bagwell HENDRIX, Claimant/Appellant, v. FOUR PROCESS, LTD., Employer/Respondent, and Federated Mutual Ins. Co., Insurer/Respondent, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri, as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Additional Party/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-11-28
Citations: 34 S.W.3d 208
Docket Number: No. ED 77807
Parties: Sue Bagwell HENDRIX, Claimant/Appellant, v. FOUR PROCESS, LTD., Employer/Respondent, and Federated Mutual Ins. Co., Insurer/Respondent, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri, as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Additional Party/Respondent.
Judges: Before MOONEY, P.J., SIMON, J., and SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 34
Pages: 208–209

Head Matter:
Sue Bagwell HENDRIX, Claimant/Appellant, v. FOUR PROCESS, LTD., Employer/Respondent, and Federated Mutual Ins. Co., Insurer/Respondent, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri, as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Additional Party/Respondent.
No. ED 77807.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Nov. 28, 2000.
Alfred J. Rathert, Fenton, for appellant.
Edward Thomas Liese, Lee Bonine Schaefer, Mary Jennifer Sommers, St. Louis, for respondents.
Before MOONEY, P.J., SIMON, J., and SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Sue Bagwell Hendrix ("Hendrix") appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission ("Commission") affirming the decisions of the Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") denying two separate workers' compensation claims filed by Hendrix. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the Commission's decision is not unsupported by substantial evidence or clearly contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence. Landers v. Chrysler Corp., 963 S.W.2d 275, 279 (Mo.App. E.D.1997). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).