Case Name: Nellie Danahay, appellee, v. Mary Polak et al., appellants: E. H. Luikart, Receiver, appellee
Court: Nebraska Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Nebraska
Decision Date: 1934-04-10
Citations: 126 Neb. 662
Docket Number: No. 28697
Parties: Nellie Danahay, appellee, v. Mary Polak et al., appellants: E. H. Luikart, Receiver, appellee.
Judges: Heard before Goss, C. J., Rose, Good, Eberly, Day and Paine, JJ., and Redick, District Judge.
Reporter: Nebraska Reports
Volume: 126
Pages: 662–663

Head Matter:
Nellie Danahay, appellee, v. Mary Polak et al., appellants: E. H. Luikart, Receiver, appellee.
Filed April 10, 1934.
No. 28697.
Davis & Vogeltanz, for appellants.
E. S. Sehiefelbein, J. H. Barry, J. F. Berggren, F. C. Radke, Barlow Nye and G. E. Price, contra.
Heard before Goss, C. J., Rose, Good, Eberly, Day and Paine, JJ., and Redick, District Judge.

Opinion:
Redick, District Judge.
This is an action on a bond by the holder thereof, Nellie Danahay, plaintiff, against the makers thereof, Frank J. and Mary Polak, this being the third case in a series of three cases involving somewhat similar facts and governed by the same rules of law. In the first of these cases, Davis v. Polak, ante, p. 640, will be found a general statement of the pleadings and evidence, as well as the evidence with reference to the bond involved herein.
This case is ruled by the principles announced in the opinion in Davis v. Polak, ante, p. 640, and no further discussion will be made, and for the reasons therein announced the judgment of the district court is affirmed as to the bond sued upon; that part of the decree denying defendants a preferential claim is reversed, with instructions to the district court to enter a decree allowing such claim in accordance with this opinion.
Affirmed in part, and reversed in part.
Paine, J., dissents for reasons stated in his dissent to Davis v. Polak.