Case Name: All Florida Land Company, Peninsular Exploration Company, All Southern Investment Corporation, Gulf Exploration Company, Florida Corporations; J. Ray Arnold, J. B. Arnold and R. L. Arnold, Petitioners, v. Thomas, Manor, Inc., a Florida Corporation, and The Aetna Casualty & Surety Company at Hartford, Connecticut, a Corporation, Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1941-04-08
Citations: 146 Fla. 564
Docket Number: 
Parties: All Florida Land Company, Peninsular Exploration Company, All Southern Investment Corporation, Gulf Exploration Company, Florida Corporations; J. Ray Arnold, J. B. Arnold and R. L. Arnold, Petitioners, v. Thomas, Manor, Inc., a Florida Corporation, and The Aetna Casualty & Surety Company at Hartford, Connecticut, a Corporation, Respondents.
Judges: Whitfield, Chapman and Thomas, J. J., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 146
Pages: 564–567

Head Matter:
All Florida Land Company, Peninsular Exploration Company, All Southern Investment Corporation, Gulf Exploration Company, Florida Corporations; J. Ray Arnold, J. B. Arnold and R. L. Arnold, Petitioners, v. Thomas, Manor, Inc., a Florida Corporation, and The Aetna Casualty & Surety Company at Hartford, Connecticut, a Corporation, Respondents.
1 So. (2nd) 567
En Banc
Opinion Filed April 8, 1941
Rehearing Denied April 25, 1941
McKgy, Macfarlane, Jackson & Ferguson, for Petitioners;
James Kytle Williams, for Respondents.

Opinion:
Adams, J.
This case comes to this Court by petition for writ of certiorari to review the correctness of an order of the Circuit Court of Dade County transferring the case from the equity side of the court to the Civil Court of Record of Dade County.
The order was entered upon authority of Section 75, Chapter 14658, General Laws of 1931, otherwise known as the 1931 Chancery Act.
In the order of transfer the chancellor retained "jurisdiction for the purposes of administering equity as between the plaintiffs in the event of recovery of a judgment on the common law side, and that this said equity cause stand stayed pending the prosecution of the cause of action hereby transferred."
The chancellor's authority was derived solely from Section 75 supra. Necessarily he was without authority to exceed the statute. If there was anything stated for equitable cognizance then the court should have jealously guarded its jurisdiction for all lawful purposes. The statute contemplates that only in cases where the suit was erroneously brought on the equity side, that it should be transferred and does not contemplate the splitting of one law suit to make two.
We hold the order otherwise correct. The writ is directed to issue with instructions to the circuit court to delete the words quoted above.
Whitfield, Chapman and Thomas, J. J., concur.
Brown, C. J., Terrell and Buford; J. dissent.