Case Name: UNITED STATES Of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Larry Wollie GREEN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-11-20
Citations: 492 F. App'x 694
Docket Number: No. 11-3354
Parties: UNITED STATES Of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Larry Wollie GREEN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge, JOHN DANIEL TINDER, Circuit Judge, and DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 492
Pages: 694–695

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES Of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Larry Wollie GREEN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-3354.
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 19, 2012.
Decided Nov. 20, 2012.
Jonathan H. Koenig, Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Milwaukee, WI, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Jonathan E. Hawley, Federal Public Defender, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Peoria, IL, A. Brian Threlkeld, Attorney, Office Of the Federal Public Defender, Urbana, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Larry W. Green, Waukesha, WI, pro se.
Before WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge, JOHN DANIEL TINDER, Circuit Judge, and DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
Larry Wollie Green pleaded guilty to distributing heroin. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(C). In his plea agreement, he waived his right to appeal his conviction or sentence except for claims that (1) the punishment exceeds the statu tory maximum, (2) the sentencing court relied on a constitutionally impermissible factor, or (3) his lawyer was ineffective. The district court sentenced Green to ten years' imprisonment. Green filed a notice of appeal, but his appointed counsel believes that the appeal is frivolous and seeks to withdraw. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Green has not responded to his lawyer's submission. See Cir. R. 51(b).
Counsel advises us that Green does not wish to challenge his guilty plea, so counsel's brief properly omits any discussion about the plea colloquy or the voluntariness of the plea. See United States v. Konczak, 683 F.3d 348, 349 (7th Cir.2012); United States v. Knox, 287 F.3d 667, 670-71 (7th Cir.2002).
As counsel concludes, Green's broad appeal waiver makes this appeal frivolous. Green's sentence is below the statutory maximum, see 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1), and the district court did not rely on any unconstitutionally impermissible factor when it imposed Green's sentence. Moreover, any claim of ineffective assistance of counsel would more properly be presented on collateral review, where the record could be more fully developed. See Massaro v. United States, 538 U.S. 500, 504-05, 123 S.Ct. 1690, 155 L.Ed.2d 714 (2003); United States v. Harris, 394 F.3d 543, 557-58 (7th Cir.2005). Because an appeal waiver stands or falls with the guilty plea, United States v. Sakellarion, 649 F.3d 634, 639 (7th Cir.2011); United States v. Cole, 569 F.3d 774, 776 (7th Cir.2009), Green's appeal waiver must be enforced.
The motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the appeal is DISMISSED.