Case Name: Rose Rukasin, Respondent, v. Nathan Harrison, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1921-06
Citations: 198 A.D. 925
Docket Number: 
Parties: Rose Rukasin, Respondent, v. Nathan Harrison, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 198
Pages: 925–925

Head Matter:
Rose Rukasin, Respondent, v. Nathan Harrison, Appellant.

Opinion:
Order of the County Court of Kings county reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and' defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings granted, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that the complaint and bill of particulars charged merely that defendant permitted the alleged defect in the sidewalk in front of his premises to continue, and not at all that he performed any affirmative act which caused the defect. (See Krebs v. Heitmann, 104 App. Div. 173.) Blaekmar, P. J., Mills, Rich, Kelly and Manning, JJ., concur.