Case Name: The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Durr, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1997-02-19
Citations: 77 Ohio St. 3d 444
Docket Number: No. 96-1581
Parties: The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Durr, Appellant.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 77
Pages: 444–445

Head Matter:
The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Durr, Appellant.
[Cite as State v. Durr (1997), 77 Ohio St.3d 444.]
(No. 96-1581
Submitted December 11, 1996
Decided February 19, 1997.)
Stephanie Tubbs Jones, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Carmen M. Marino, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
David H. Bodiker, Ohio Public Defender, and William S. Lazarow, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying appellant's application for reopening. Appellant has failed to establish the existence of a colorable claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel under Strickland v. Washington (1984), 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674. We further reject appellant's propositions of law raised before this court for the same reasons articulated by the court of appeals.
Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.