Case Name: DAVIS PARKS, INC., Appellant, v. POOLE ENGINEERING COMPANY OF FORT WALTON BEACH, a Florida corporation, Appellee; DAVIS PARKS, INC., Appellant, v. James WORLEY, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1971-12-23
Citations: 255 So. 2d 713
Docket Number: Nos. P-80, P-81
Parties: DAVIS PARKS, INC., Appellant, v. POOLE ENGINEERING COMPANY OF FORT WALTON BEACH, a Florida corporation, Appellee. DAVIS PARKS, INC., Appellant, v. James WORLEY, Appellee.
Judges: CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 255
Pages: 713–714

Head Matter:
DAVIS PARKS, INC., Appellant, v. POOLE ENGINEERING COMPANY OF FORT WALTON BEACH, a Florida corporation, Appellee. DAVIS PARKS, INC., Appellant, v. James WORLEY, Appellee.
Nos. P-80, P-81.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Dec. 23, 1971.
James E. Moore of Moore & Crump, Niceville, and Charles D. Stewart, Fort Walton Beach, for appellant.
James W. Middleton, Virginia Searcy Barr, and Smith & Tolton, for Walton Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant seeks review of the adverse final judgments rendered in favor of appel-lees in each of the above-entitled causes. The principal question preserved on appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgments here challenged.
In our review of the issues presented for decision, we have given due consideration to the applicable principle that a judgment of the trial court reaches the appellate court clothed with a presumption of correctness. The record reveals that although the testimony is conflicting in some material respects, it contains substantial evidence to support the findings made and conclusions reached by the trial court. It is not the province of this court to substitute its judgment for that of the trier of the facts. These findings will not be disturbed in the absence of a clear showing that the trial court committed error or the evidence demonstrates that the conclusions reached are erroneous.
The judgments appealed are respectively affirmed.
CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
. Old Equity Life Insurance Company v. Levenson (Fla.App.1965) 177 So.2d 50; Stoller v. Jaffe (Fla.App.1961) 125 So. 2d 310.