Case Name: Curtis DONAHUE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2013-03-26
Citations: 394 S.W.3d 498
Docket Number: No. WD 73917
Parties: Curtis DONAHUE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Division I: MARK D. PFEIFFER, Presiding Judge, and VICTOR C. HOWARD and ALOK AHUJA, Judges.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 394
Pages: 498–498

Head Matter:
Curtis DONAHUE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 73917.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
March 26, 2013.
Laura G. Martin, District Defender, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before Division I: MARK D. PFEIFFER, Presiding Judge, and VICTOR C. HOWARD and ALOK AHUJA, Judges.

Opinion:
Order
PER CURIAM:
Curtis Donahue appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Finding no error, we affirm in this per curiam order and have provided the parties a legal memorandum explaining our ruling today. Rule 84.16(b).