Case Name: Reginald E. JARVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-06-23
Citations: 282 F. App'x 259
Docket Number: No. 07-1994
Parties: Reginald E. JARVIS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 282
Pages: 259–259

Head Matter:
Reginald E. JARVIS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 07-1994.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 19, 2008.
Decided: June 23, 2008.
Phillip R. Kete, General Counsel, AFGE Local 1923, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Larry D. Adams, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Reginald E. Jarvis appeals the district court's order granting Defendant's summary judgment motion on his race discrimination claim, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jarvis v. Astrue, No. 1:05-cv-02950-CCB, 2007 WL 2332694 (D.Md. July 31, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.