Case Name: Jack Brause et al., Doing Business as Third Ave. Leasing Company, Appellant, v. 2968 Third Avenue, Inc., et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1964-06-04
Citations: 43 Misc. 2d 691
Docket Number: 
Parties: Jack Brause et al., Doing Business as Third Ave. Leasing Company, Appellant, v. 2968 Third Avenue, Inc., et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 43
Pages: 691–692

Head Matter:
Jack Brause et al., Doing Business as Third Ave. Leasing Company, Appellant, v. 2968 Third Avenue, Inc., et al., Respondents.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
June 4, 1964.
Keating & Brodkin (Albert H. Brodkin of counsel), for appellant. Martin A. Jacobs (Richard Steel of counsel), for respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
While the trial court erred in holding that the termination provision of the lease was a " condition " rather than a " conditional limitation " (see, generally, Burnee Corp. v. Uneeda Pure Orange Drink Co., 132 Misc. 435; Ehret Holding Corp. v. Anderson Galleries, 138 Misc. 722), the court properly had jurisdiction of the subject matter so as to reach a decision on the merits.
The judgment should be affirmed, with $25 costs.
Concur — Gold, J. P., Tilzeb and Hofstadter, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, etc.