Case Name: Edward Michael O'BRIEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VISA USA, INC.; Visa International, Inc.; Capital One Financial Corporation, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-03-21
Citations: 225 F. App'x 677
Docket Number: No. 05-56887
Parties: Edward Michael O’BRIEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VISA USA, INC.; Visa International, Inc.; Capital One Financial Corporation, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 225
Pages: 677–678

Head Matter:
Edward Michael O’BRIEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VISA USA, INC.; Visa International, Inc.; Capital One Financial Corporation, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 05-56887.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 12, 2007.
Filed March 21, 2007.
Edward Michael O’Brien, Santa Barbara, CA, pro se.
Before: KOZINSKI, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Edward Michael O'Brien appeals pro se from the district court's order dismissing for failure to prosecute his action against various financial institutions. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion, Oyama v. Sheehan (In re Sheehan), 253 F.3d 507, 511 (9th Cir.2001), and we affirm.
O'Brien contends the district court abused its discretion by dismissing his action for failure to prosecute. This contention is unpersuasive because O'Brien did not establish that he served process on any defendant within 120 days of filing his complaint. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m) (providing a plaintiff with 120 days to serve process); see also Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(h)(1) (describing the manner of effecting proper service upon a corporation).
O'Brien's remaining contentions are also unpersuasive.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.