Case Name: WASHINGTON v. DAWSON
Court: United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1846-04-07
Citations: 29 F. Cas. 345
Docket Number: 
Parties: WASHINGTON v. DAWSON.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Cases
Volume: 29
Pages: 345–345

Head Matter:
Case No. 17,227.
WASHINGTON v. DAWSON.
[1 Hayw. & H. 236.]
Circuit Court, District of Columbia.
April 7, 1846.
Justice of the Peace — Attachment fob Contempt.
Under Act Md. 1791, c. 68, § 8, an attachment for contempt can be issued against a witness who reiuses to obey a summons issued by a justice of the peace.
Attachment for contempt.
In this case John T. Wright was summoned to attend before justice of the peace John D. Clark and disobeyed the summons, whereupon the justice issued an attachment against Wright on the day of trial. It was issued under Act Md. 1791, c. 68, § 8, returnable before the circuit court now in session. John T. Wright was brought before the court by John W. Dexter, the constable to whom the attachment was directed.
Mr. Bradley, attorney for the corporation,
said it was exceedingly desirable that the court should make a decision with reference to the present case that would settle the point, as many witnesses summoned to give testimony before the justices had refused to attend, under the idea that they were not legally bound to hbey the summons.
[Reported by John A. Hayward, Esq., and Geo. C. Hazleton, Esq.]
Act 1791, c. 68, § 8: Where witnesses do not attend according to summons, the justice before whom such witness ought to have attended shall enforce obedience to his process by attachment of contempt, to be returnable before the justices of the next county court, who shall take cognizance thereof and shall at their discretion fine the offender any sum not exceeding 20s. current money for every such offence, to be applied towards the county charge. 1 Herty’s Laws Md. p. 488; Thomp. Dig. 260.

Opinion:
The Honorable Judges MOB-SELL
and DUNLOP concurred in the opinion expressed at the bar; that the practice should be established, and witnesses should know that it was their duty to yield obedience to the summons of the constituted authorities.