Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Askia J. COLEMAN, Appellant; Askia J. COLEMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-03-28
Citations: 895 S.W.2d 637
Docket Number: Nos. 64149, 66495
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Askia J. COLEMAN, Appellant. Askia J. COLEMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before REINBARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 895
Pages: 637–637

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Askia J. COLEMAN, Appellant. Askia J. COLEMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 64149, 66495.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
March 28, 1995.
Rose M. Wibbenmeyer, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., David G. Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before REINBARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals from the judgment entered pursuant to his conviction by a jury of unlawful possession of cocaine in violation of § 195.202 RSMo 1994, for which he was sentenced to two years imprisonment. In his sole point on appeal, Defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find Defendant's contention to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
. Defendant also filed a separate appeal from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after evidentiary hearing. However, Defendant makes no assignment of error with respect to that ruling and the appeal is therefore deemed abandoned.