Case Name: Leontis KALE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-09-27
Citations: 767 So. 2d 1269
Docket Number: No. 3D00-1207
Parties: Leontis KALE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and SHEVIN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 767
Pages: 1269–1269

Head Matter:
Leontis KALE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D00-1207.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Sept. 27, 2000.
Leontis Kale, in proper person.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and SHEVIN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Although the trial judge denied the defendant's 3.850 motion on the erroneous ground that it was untimely filed, we affirm on the authority of section 39.059(7)(d), Florida Statutes (1995). See Cargle v. State, No. SC92031, slip op. at 7 & n. 2, — So.2d-,-& n. 2, 2000 WL 1353726 (Fla. Sept.21, 2000) (majority opinion); id. at 8-10, at-(Pariente, J., concurring).