Case Name: PURDY v. WINTERS' ESTATE
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1916-10-27
Citations: 85 Or. 188
Docket Number: 
Parties: PURDY v. WINTERS’ ESTATE.
Judges: Mr. Chief Justice McBride and Mr. Justice Bean not sitting.
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 85
Pages: 188–194

Head Matter:
Motion to dismiss appeal allowed October 27, 1916.
Rebearing on motion to dismiss appeal argued July 10, opinion dismissing appeal sustained July 17, 1917.
PURDY v. WINTERS’ ESTATE.
(159 Pac. 1091; 166 Pac. 536.)
ON REHEARING.
Appeal and Error — Decisions Reviewable — Order Relating to New Trial.
1. Where a final decree was entered dismissing a suit with prejudice, a motion subsequently filed to set aside such decree and asking for an order changing venue, amounted to a motion for a new trial, and an order denying such motion was not appealable, and motion to dismiss an appeal therefrom will be sustained.
From Multnomah: Henry E. McGinn, Judge.
On motion to dismiss appeal.
Motion allowed. Appeal dismissed.
Mr. Cicero M. Idlemcm and Mr. John P. Winter, for the motion.
Mr. Will E. Purdy, propria persona, contra.

Opinion:
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Moore.
This is a motion to dismiss an appeal. A judgment in a former action between these parties, rendered in favor of the defendants, was affirmed on appeal: Purdy v. Wmters' Estate, 79 Or. 614 (156 Pac. 285). When the mandate went down the plaintiff commenced another action wherein the complaint set forth substantially the charges made in the former action. A demurrer to the complaint herein was sustained and the action dismissed without prejudice, from which latter judgment the plaintiff again appeals. Believing that the questions here involved have been fully litigated and finally determined by this court, the appeal should be dismissed and it is so ordered. Dismissed.
Former opinion sustained on rehearing July 17, 1917.