Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edgar Lamar SCOTT, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-11-13
Citations: 21 F. App'x 774
Docket Number: No. 00-50469; D.C. No. CR-99-00962-CBM-01
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Edgar Lamar SCOTT, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 21
Pages: 774–774

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Edgar Lamar SCOTT, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 00-50469.
D.C. No. CR-99-00962-CBM-01.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 5, 2001.
Decided Nov. 13, 2001.
Before KLEINFELD, McKEOWN, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Edgar Scott appeals his conviction, pursuant to a guilty plea, and sentence for armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) & (d). Scott's attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and has moved to withdraw as counsel of record. Scott did not file a pro se supplemental brief. Having conducted an independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we conclude that there are no arguable appellate issues. Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.