Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert JACKSON, Sr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-05-20
Citations: 519 F. App'x 668
Docket Number: No. 12-10765
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert JACKSON, Sr., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before BARKETT, MARCUS and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 519
Pages: 668–669

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert JACKSON, Sr., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-10765.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
May 20, 2013.
Susan Hollis Rothstein-Youakim, Robert E. O’Neill, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, Robert Edward Bodnar, Jr., Peggy Morris Ronca, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Orlando, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Tracy N. DaCruz, Rosemary Cakmis, Donna Lee Elm, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Orlando, FL, for Defendant Appellant.
Robert Jackson, Sr., Butner, NC, pro se.
Before BARKETT, MARCUS and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
BY THE COURT:
Tracy N. DaCruz, appointed counsel for Robert Jackson, Sr., in this appeal of the district court's denial of Jackson's motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the denial of Jackson's § 3582(c)(2) motion is AFFIRMED.