Case Name: Inocencio Zamorano HERNANDEZ, Employee, v. FANTOM WIRE, INC. and State Fund Mutual Insurance Company, Respondents, and Specialty Staff, Inc., Self-Insured, claims administered by Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Relators
Court: Minnesota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Minnesota
Decision Date: 2007-03-01
Citations: 728 N.W.2d 81
Docket Number: No. A06-2260
Parties: Inocencio Zamorano HERNANDEZ, Employee, v. FANTOM WIRE, INC. and State Fund Mutual Insurance Company, Respondents, and Specialty Staff, Inc., Self-Insured, claims administered by Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Relators.
Judges: 
Reporter: North Western Reporter 2d
Volume: 728
Pages: 81–82

Head Matter:
Inocencio Zamorano HERNANDEZ, Employee, v. FANTOM WIRE, INC. and State Fund Mutual Insurance Company, Respondents, and Specialty Staff, Inc., Self-Insured, claims administered by Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Relators.
No. A06-2260.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
March 1, 2007.
Hon. Debra Wilson.
Scott A. Teplinsky, Katz, Manka, Teplin-sky, Due & Sobol, Ltd., Minneapolis, MN, for Respondent Hernandez.
Steven T. Scharfenberg, Lynn, Schar-fenberg & Associates, Minneapolis, MN, for Respondents.
John H. Guthmann, Trisha A. Vicario, Hansen, Dordell, Bradt, Odlaug & Bradt, PLLP, St. Paul, MN, for Relators.

Opinion:
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed October 31, 2006, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that, [s]ummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).
BY THE COURT:
/s/Paul H. Anderson Associate Justice