Case Name: Randall TOWNSEND, Appellant, v. Charles E. LANE, Jr., d/b/a Sabal Marketing, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-09-01
Citations: 659 So. 2d 720
Docket Number: No. 94-1913
Parties: Randall TOWNSEND, Appellant, v. Charles E. LANE, Jr., d/b/a Sabal Marketing, Appellee.
Judges: PETERSON, C.J., and GOSHORN and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 659
Pages: 720–720

Head Matter:
Randall TOWNSEND, Appellant, v. Charles E. LANE, Jr., d/b/a Sabal Marketing, Appellee.
No. 94-1913.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Sept. 1, 1995.
Randall Townsend, Odessa, pro se.
Charles E. Williams, Jr., of Brown & Williams, P.A., Orlando, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. Flemenbaum v. Flemenbaum, 636 So.2d 579 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994) (To entitle a movant to an evidentiary hearing, a rule 1.540(b)(3) motion must specify the fraud and explain why the fraud, if it exists, would entitle the movant to have the judgment set aside); Shienvold v. Habie, 627 So.2d 1203, 1205 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) ("Because appellant did not specifically plead the two grounds that would have formed a basis for relief — fraud and coercion — the trial court correctly dismissed the petition for failure to state a cause of action."), rev. denied, 640 So.2d 1107 (Fla.1994).
AFFIRMED.
PETERSON, C.J., and GOSHORN and HARRIS, JJ., concur.