Case Name: JIANBIN ZHANG, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-08-29
Citations: 196 F. App'x 177
Docket Number: No. 06-1366
Parties: JIANBIN ZHANG, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 196
Pages: 177–177

Head Matter:
JIANBIN ZHANG, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 06-1366.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 18, 2006.
Decided: Aug. 29, 2006.
Jianbin Zhang, Petitioner Pro Se. James Arthur Hunolt, Kristin Kay Edison, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Jianbin Zhang, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("Board") denying his motion to reconsider its prior order, which adopted and affirmed the immigration judge's denial of his request for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have reviewed the record and the Board's order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reconsider. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2005); Jean v. Gonzales, 435 F.3d 475, 481 (4th Cir.2006). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Zhang, No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ] (B.I.A. Feb. 27, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.