Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Katherine Anne HOOVER; John F. Tomasic, No pending federal criminal charges, Claimants-Appellants, and $88,029.08, more or less, in United States Currency; $27,671.50, more or less, in United States Currency, Defendants, and Margaret E. Lupher; Diane E. Shafer, M.D., Claimants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-08-26
Citations: 538 F. App'x 330
Docket Number: No. 12-2443
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Katherine Anne HOOVER; John F. Tomasic, No pending federal criminal charges, Claimants-Appellants, and $88,029.08, more or less, in United States Currency; $27,671.50, more or less, in United States Currency, Defendants, and Margaret E. Lupher; Diane E. Shafer, M.D., Claimants.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 538
Pages: 330–331

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Katherine Anne HOOVER; John F. Tomasic, No pending federal criminal charges, Claimants-Appellants, and $88,029.08, more or less, in United States Currency; $27,671.50, more or less, in United States Currency, Defendants, and Margaret E. Lupher; Diane E. Shafer, M.D., Claimants.
No. 12-2443.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 22, 2013.
Decided: Aug. 26, 2013.
Katherine Anne Hoover and John F. Tomasic, Appellants Pro Se. Fred B. Westfall, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Betty Adkins Pullin, Office of the United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Katherine Anne Hoover and John F. Tomasic appeal the district court's order accepting the magistrate judge's recommendations and entering judgment in favor of the Government in these civil forfeiture proceedings. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. $88,029.08, No. 2:10-cv-01087, 2012 WL 4499084 (S.D.W.Va. Sept. 28, 2012). We further deny Appellants' motion to submit newly discovered information and their request for oral argument. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.