Case Name: GARY E. WIMER, Respondent, v. PENNSYLVANIA EMPLOYEES BENEFIT TRUST FUND (PEBTF), Petitioner
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2006-09-14
Citations: 908 A.2d 268
Docket Number: Appeal No. 65 WAL 2005
Parties: GARY E. WIMER, Respondent, v. PENNSYLVANIA EMPLOYEES BENEFIT TRUST FUND (PEBTF), Petitioner.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 908
Pages: 268–269

Head Matter:
GARY E. WIMER, Respondent, v. PENNSYLVANIA EMPLOYEES BENEFIT TRUST FUND (PEBTF), Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Sept. 14, 2006.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 14th day of September 2006, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted limited to the following issues:
Did the Superior Court err as a matter of law when it concluded that Appellee Gary E. Wimer ("Wimer") was not required to exhaust his contractual remedies under the PEBTF's governing plan documents?
Did the Superior Court err as a matter of law when it concluded that the PEBTF's right to subrogation is determined as of the date when it reimbursed Wimer's medical expenses and therefore concluded that the PEBTF should be denied the right of subrogation for any medical payments made on Wimer's behalf after January 1,1998?