Case Name: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. SAMUEL KRIS HUNT
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 2014-12-19
Citations: 367 N.C. 700
Docket Number: No. 195PA11-2
Parties: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. SAMUEL KRIS HUNT
Judges: Justice HUNTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Reporter: North Carolina Reports
Volume: 367
Pages: 700–701

Head Matter:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. SAMUEL KRIS HUNT
No. 195PA11-2
(Filed 19 December 2014)
Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals,_N.C. App._, 728 S.E.2d 409 (2012), on remand from this Court, 365 N.C. 432, 722 S.E.2d 484 (2012), finding no error in part and vacating in part a judgment entered on 8 October 2009 by Judge Edwin G. Wilson, Jr. in Superior Court, Randolph County, and remanding for resentencing. On 7 March 2013, the Supreme Court allowed the State’s petition for discretionary review of an additional issue. Heard in the Supreme Court on 18 November 2013. Following oral argument, the Court op 9 December 2013 ordered supplemental briefing on one issue. Determined on the supplemental briefs without further oral argument pursuant to Rule 30(f) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Elizabeth J. Weese and Anne M. Middleton, Assistant Attorneys General, for the Stateappellee/appellant.
M. Alexander Chams for defendant-appellant/appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
On defendant's appeal arising from the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed. The State's petition for discretionary review as to an additional issue was improvidently allowed.
AFFIRMED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED IN PART.
Justice HUNTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.