Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ernest BROWN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-11-10
Citations: 112 F. App'x 920
Docket Number: No. 04-7299
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ernest BROWN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 112
Pages: 920–920

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ernest BROWN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 04-7299.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 4, 2004.
Decided: Nov. 10, 2004.
Ernest Brown, Appellant pro se.
Jamie M. Bennett, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Ernest Brown appeals the district court's order denying without prejudice the motion for reconsideration of the denial of the motion for a certificate of appeal-ability. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Brown, No. CR-97-15-MJG (D.Md. July 16, 2004). To the extent Brown seeks reconsideration in this court of the denial of the motion for a certificate of appealability, we deny reconsideration. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED