Case Name: C. D. FRASER v. L. G. RAYMOND et al.
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1928-03-13
Citations: 124 Or. 542
Docket Number: 
Parties: C. D. FRASER v. L. G. RAYMOND et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 124
Pages: 542–542

Head Matter:
Submitted on brief by appellant and argued by respondents March 8,
affirmed March 13, 1928.
C. D. FRASER v. L. G. RAYMOND et al.
(264 Pac. 1119.)
For appellant there was a brief over the name of Mr. Frank H. Beeves.
For respondents there was a brief over the names of Mr. John P. Hannon and Messrs. Murdoch & Crum, with an oral argument by Mr. V. D. Dusenbury.

Opinion:
PEE CUEIAM.
This is an appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to the amended complaint and dismissing the action.
W'e have carefully considered the allegations of the complaint and find that it states no cause of action. The demurrer was, therefore, properly sustained and the judgment is affirmed.
Aefirmed.