Case Name: Antonio L. GOMEZ; et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-08-21
Citations: 72 F. App'x 730
Docket Number: No. 03-15425; D.C. No. CV-02-00381-JMR
Parties: Antonio L. GOMEZ; et al., Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 72
Pages: 730–731

Head Matter:
Antonio L. GOMEZ; et al., Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
No. 03-15425. D.C. No. CV-02-00381-JMR.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 11, 2003.
Decided Aug. 21, 2003.
Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, HAWKINS and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Antonio L. Gomez and Brenda L. Gomez appeal pro se the district court's dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction of their tax refund lawsuit against the United States.
The district court correctly determined that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over appellants' action, because they failed to fully prepay the amount of taxes assessed to them. 26 U.S.C. § 7422(a); 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(1); Latch v. United States, 842 F.2d 1031, 1033 (9th Cir.1988).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.