Case Name: Lucile Pero, Plaintiff in Error v. Charles J. Corley, Defendant in Error
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1924-05-07
Citations: 87 Fla. 448
Docket Number: 
Parties: Lucile Pero, Plaintiff in Error v. Charles J. Corley, Defendant in Error.
Judges: Whitfield, P. J., and West and Terrell, J. J., concur..
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 87
Pages: 448–448

Head Matter:
Lucile Pero, Plaintiff in Error v. Charles J. Corley, Defendant in Error.
Decision Filed May 7, 1924.
This case was decided by Division B.
A Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Dade County; H. F. Atkinson, Judge.
Jcmies M. Carson and John M. Murrell, for Plaintiff in Error;
Gautier & Neeley, for Defendant in Error.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The declaration herein does not wholly fail to state a cause of action, therefore the demurrer thereto should have been overruled. See Wertz v. Tampa Electric Co., 78 Fla. 405, 83 South. Rep. 270; Peterson v. Oscar Daniels Co., 83 Fla. 29, 90 South. Rep. 621.
The judgment rendered on the demurrer is reversed.
Whitfield, P. J., and West and Terrell, J. J., concur..