Case Name: CHARLES MURADIAN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM, PLAINTIFF, v. JOSEPH PAGANESSI, DEFENDANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1925-10-19
Citations: 3 N.J. Misc. 1042
Docket Number: 
Parties: CHARLES MURADIAN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM, PLAINTIFF, v. JOSEPH PAGANESSI, DEFENDANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 3
Pages: 1042–1042

Head Matter:
CHARLES MURADIAN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM, PLAINTIFF, v. JOSEPH PAGANESSI, DEFENDANT.
Decided October 19, 1925.
Before. Gummere, Chief Justice, and Justices Kalisch and Campbell.
For the plaintiff, Gross & Gross.
For the defendant, McDermott, Enright & Carpenter.

Opinion:
Pee Cueiam.
This is an action to recover damages under the Death act, •resulting in a Verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $100.
Plaintiff has a rule to show-cause why such verdict should not be set aside as inadequate.
We ffnd it to be so inadequate that it must be set aside.
The rule to show cause is therefore made absolute, with costs.