Case Name: C. Howard HOOK and W. W. Miller, Doing Business as a Partnership Under the Name and Style of Hook & Miller, v. HOOK & ACKERMAN, Inc., Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1953-02-06
Citations: 201 F.2d 512
Docket Number: No. 1082
Parties: C. Howard HOOK and W. W. Miller, Doing Business as a Partnership Under the Name and Style of Hook & Miller, v. HOOK & ACKERMAN, Inc., Appellant.
Judges: Before GOODRICH, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 201
Pages: 512–512

Head Matter:
C. Howard HOOK and W. W. Miller, Doing Business as a Partnership Under the Name and Style of Hook & Miller, v. HOOK & ACKERMAN, Inc., Appellant.
No. 1082.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued Jan. 22, 1953.
Decided Feb. 6, 1953.
Harry Price, New York City (Stoneciptier & Cunningham, by Charles L. Cunningham, Pittsburgh, Pa., Matthew Sidney Birón, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for Harold S. Ackerman and Hook & Ackerman, Inc.
William B. Jaspert, Pittsburgh, Pa., for C. Howard Hook and W. W. Miller, ind. and d/b/a Hook & Miller; and R. O. Graffius.
Before GOODRICH, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Points presented in this appeal were all discussed in the opihion of Judge Stewart in the district court. Hook v. Hook & Ackerman, Inc., D.C.W.D.Pa.1952, 103 F.Supp. 790. We think that he was right and affirm for the reasons set out in his opinion.
The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.