Case Name: Jennifer BACH, Petitioner, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-12-19
Citations: 837 So. 2d 395
Docket Number: No. SC01-2598
Parties: Jennifer BACH, Petitioner, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Respondent.
Judges: ANSTEAD, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, and CANTERO, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 837
Pages: 395–396

Head Matter:
Jennifer BACH, Petitioner, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Respondent.
No. SC01-2598.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Dec. 19, 2002.
Stacy Strolla of the Law Offices of Strol-la & Strolla, West Palm Beach, FL, for Petitioner.
Lucinda A. Hoffmann of Holland & Knight LLP, Miami, FL, for Respondent.
Richard E. Johnson, Tallahassee, FL, for the National Employment Lawyers Association, Florida Chapter, Amicus Curiae.
Michael J. Farrell, Supervisory Trial Attorney, EEOC Miami District Office, Miami, FL; and Susan R. Oxford, Attorney, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Washington, D.C., for U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Amicus Curiae.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have for review the Fourth District Court of Appeal's decision in Bach v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 808 So.2d 230 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), which adopted the analysis of the Third District Court of Appeal's decision in Woodham v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., 793 So.2d 41 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001), quashed, 829 So.2d 891 (Fla.2002). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418, 420 (Fla.1981). For the reasons expressed in our opinion in Woodham v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., 829 So.2d 891 (Fla.2002), the decision of the Fourth District is hereby quashed. We remand to the district court for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
It is so ordered.
ANSTEAD, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, and CANTERO, JJ., concur.