Case Name: In re Ellis S. FRISON, Jr., Respondent
Court: District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Decision Date: 2013-07-25
Citations: 71 A.3d 721
Docket Number: No. 13-BG-545
Parties: In re Ellis S. FRISON, Jr., Respondent.
Judges: Before: BLACKBURNE-RIGSBY, Associate Judge, and NEBEKER and FARRELL, Senior Judges.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 71
Pages: 721–722

Head Matter:
In re Ellis S. FRISON, Jr., Respondent.
No. 13-BG-545.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Filed July 25, 2013.
Before: BLACKBURNE-RIGSBY, Associate Judge, and NEBEKER and FARRELL, Senior Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
On consideration of the Board on Professional Responsibility's Report and Recommendation, this court's June 3, 2013, order directing respondent to show cause why he should not be suspended pending final action on the Board's report, and no response having been filed, it is
ORDERED that respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia pending further order of this court. See D.C.Bar R. XI, § 9(g)(2)(a). This suspension shall commence thirty days after entry of this order, pursuant to D.C.Bar R. XI § 9(g)(4) and § 14(f). It is
FURTHER ORDERED that respondent's attention is directed to the requirements of D.C.Bar R. XI, § 14 relating to suspended attorneys and D.C.Bar R. XI, § 16(c), dealing with the timing of eligibility for reinstatement as related to compliance with R. XI, § 14, including filing of the required affidavit. For purposes of filing a petition for reinstatement, respondent's suspension will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C.Bar R. XI, § 14(g).