Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jamie Sylvester HAWKINS, a/k/a Jaime Sylvester Hawkins, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-06-02
Citations: 433 F. App'x 182
Docket Number: No. 10-7629
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jamie Sylvester HAWKINS, a/k/a Jaime Sylvester Hawkins, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 433
Pages: 182–182

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jamie Sylvester HAWKINS, a/k/a Jaime Sylvester Hawkins, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-7629.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 19, 2011.
Decided: June 2, 2011.
Jamie Sylvester Hawkins, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jamie Sylvester Hawkins appeals the district court's order denying his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error because, as a career offender, Hawkins' offense level was determined based on his status as a career offender, U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 4B1.1, rather than on relevant conduct under USSG § 2Dl.l(c). Amendment 706 of the Guidelines did not impact § 4B1.1. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.