Case Name: Lee vs. Chambers
Court: Berrien County Circuit Court
Jurisdiction: Michigan
Decision Date: 1870
Citations: 1 Mich. N.P. R. 241
Docket Number: 
Parties: Lee vs. Chambers.
Judges: 
Reporter: The Michigan Nisi Prius Reports
Volume: 1
Pages: 241–241

Head Matter:
Lee vs. Chambers.
The summons In a writ of replevin “to appear before the undersigned, a Justice of the Peace of Buchanan, in said county, at my office,” 1b sufficiently certain.
Berrien Circuit,
1870.
Motion on special appeal.
O. L. Goolidge, in support of the motion,
contended it was uncertain as to where the office was, and cited 1 Cow. T. 458; Haines’ Justice, 168; C. L., §§ 3665, 3695.

Opinion:
By the Court,
Blackman, J.
The Court takes judicial notice that Buchanan is a township in Berrien oounty, and that the i us tice must have his office in that town. The phrase " of Buchanan, in Said county at my office" is in substance the same as at my office in the township in which I am a justice."
Motion denied.