Case Name: Magdalena VARGO, Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2015-02-24
Citations: 456 S.W.3d 99
Docket Number: No. ED 100899
Parties: Magdalena VARGO, Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Respondent.
Judges: Before Patricia L. Cohen, P.J., Roy: L. Richter, J., and Robert M. Clayton III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 456
Pages: 99–100

Head Matter:
Magdalena VARGO, Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Respondent.
No. ED 100899
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
Filed: February 24, 2015
Douglas B. Ponder, 1141 South Seventh Street, Suite'309, St. Louis, MO 63104, for appellant.
Nancy E. Emrael, Assistant City Counselor, 1200 Market Street, Room 314, St. Louis, MO 63103, for respondent.
Before Patricia L. Cohen, P.J., Roy: L. Richter, J., and Robert M. Clayton III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Magdalena Vargo (Plaintiff) appeals the trial court judgment in favor of the City of St. Louis (City) on her claim that the City discriminated against her on' the basis of her age in violation of the Missouri Human Rights Act when it terminated her employment. Plaintiff asserts that the trial court erred in excluding statistical evidence relating to the ages of all employees laid off by the City in the two years preceding her termination.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error in any of the respects alleged. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum, for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).