Case Name: David Herman DUMPH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Milton NOWELL; Bob Gaddy, Jerry Vandiford; Thomas Asbell; North Carolina Department of Correction, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-10-31
Citations: 49 F. App'x 474
Docket Number: No. 02-7123
Parties: David Herman DUMPH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Milton NOWELL; Bob Gaddy, Jerry Vandiford; Thomas Asbell; North Carolina Department of Correction, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 49
Pages: 474–474

Head Matter:
David Herman DUMPH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Milton NOWELL; Bob Gaddy, Jerry Vandiford; Thomas Asbell; North Carolina Department of Correction, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 02-7123.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 24, 2002.
Decided Oct. 31, 2002.
David Herman Dumph, Appellant Pro Se. Burén Riley Shields, III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
David Dumph appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Dumph v. Nowell, No. CA-01-634-5-BO (E.D.N.C. July 23, 2002). Additionally, Dumph's motion to participate in oral argument is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.