Case Name: In the Matter of the Estate of David Glickman, Deceased
Court: New York Surrogate's Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1928-09-18
Citations: 132 Misc. 785
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Estate of David Glickman, Deceased.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 132
Pages: 785–786

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Estate of David Glickman, Deceased.
Surrogate’s Court, Kings County,
September 18, 1928.
Panken & Levy [Matthew M. Levy of counsel], for Sarah H. Glickman.
Louis Soil, for the administratrix.
Albert D. Schanzer, special guardian.

Opinion:
Wingate, S.
A judgment for alimony is a judgment rendered after a verdict or decision imposing a liability on the husband to pay a particular amount of money, and it does not abate until its purpose is accomplished any more than any other judgment for money. (Carr v. Rischer, 119 N. Y. 117; Van Ness v. Ransom, 215 id. 557.) It follows, therefore, that the claim for interest on unpaid alimony is a proper charge against the estate of the decedent and is allowed. The other objections were disposed of on the hearing. Submit decree on notice.