Case Name: Moritz v. Florida East Coast Railway Company, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Florida, and Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Virginia, and Pennsylvania Railroad Company, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Pennsylvania, Garnishee, Appellant
Court: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1928-03-02
Citations: 92 Pa. Super. 291
Docket Number: Appeal No. 329
Parties: Moritz v. Florida East Coast Railway Company, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Florida, and Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Virginia, and Pennsylvania Railroad Company, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Pennsylvania, Garnishee, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Pennsylvania Superior Court Reports
Volume: 92
Pages: 291–291

Head Matter:
Moritz v. Florida East Coast Railway Company, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Florida, and Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Virginia, and Pennsylvania Railroad Company, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Pennsylvania, Garnishee, Appellant.
March 2, 1928:
Argued November 16, 1927.

Opinion:
Opinion by
Keller, J.,
This appeal was argued with the case of Sabarof versus Florida East Coast Ry. Co. et al, [the same defendants and garnishee] No. 328 October Term 1927, decided this day. It raises the same questions passed on in that case and requires the same disposition.
The second assignment of error is sustained. The order of the court below discharging the rule to dissolve the attachment is reversed and the rule is reinstated and made absolute.