Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Norman Anthony BROWN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-04-21
Citations: 323 F. App'x 526
Docket Number: No. 08-30249
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Norman Anthony BROWN, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: GRABER, GOULD and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 323
Pages: 526–527

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Norman Anthony BROWN, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 08-30249.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 13, 2009.
Filed April 21, 2009.
Hannah Horsley, Assistant U.S., Stephen Piefer, Esquire, Office Of The U.S. Attorney, Portland, OR, for Plaintiff-Ap-pellee.
Robert M. Stone, Robert Stone, Attorney at Law P.C., Medford, OR, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: GRABER, GOULD and BEA, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Norman Anthony Brown appeals from the district court's revocation of supervised release and the 21-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Brown's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Brown has filed a pro se supplemental brief. No answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of.the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's order is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.