Case Name: In the Matter of the Conservatorship of Jean Weinstein, a protected person. ORANS, Appellant, v. WILLIS, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1986-08-06
Citations: 80 Or. App. 587
Docket Number: 7815 and/or 7915; CA A35365
Parties: In the Matter of the Conservatorship of Jean Weinstein, a protected person. ORANS, Appellant, v. WILLIS, Respondent.
Judges: Before Warden, Presiding Judge, and Joseph, Chief Judge, and Young, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 80
Pages: 587–588

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted June 9,
affirmed August 6, 1986
In the Matter of the Conservatorship of Jean Weinstein, a protected person. ORANS, Appellant, v. WILLIS, Respondent.
(7815 and/or 7915; CA A35365)
722 P2d 744
Scott W. McGraw, Corvallis, argued the cause for appellant. On the briefs was Guy B. Rencher II, Corvallis.
J. Britton Conroy, Corvallis, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.
Before Warden, Presiding Judge, and Joseph, Chief Judge, and Young, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
This appeal arises out of an attempt by a grandson, aided and abetted by his mother, to have the grandmother's conservator removed. He lost in the trial court and has appealed. The matter is before us on de novo review. On the basis of that review, we determine that the case and the appeal are without any discernible merit whatsoever and should not, in good conscience, have ever been initiated, let alone appealed.
Affirmed.