Case Name: Abe GIVINS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant v. James J. BRISCO, Prosecuting Attorney, St. Charles County; Gwenda R. Robinson, Attorney; Carolyn C. Woods, Prosecuting Attorney; City of Town and Country; Patrick Kranz, Police Officer, Captain, Town and Country Police Department; John Nienhaus, Police Officer, Detective, Town and Country Police Department; Joan M. Gilmer, Circuit Clerk, St. Louis County, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-06-27
Citations: 515 F. App'x 624
Docket Number: No. 12-3847
Parties: Abe GIVINS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant v. James J. BRISCO, Prosecuting Attorney, St. Charles County; Gwenda R. Robinson, Attorney; Carolyn C. Woods, Prosecuting Attorney; City of Town and Country; Patrick Kranz, Police Officer, Captain, Town and Country Police Department; John Nienhaus, Police Officer, Detective, Town and Country Police Department; Joan M. Gilmer, Circuit Clerk, St. Louis County, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 515
Pages: 624–625

Head Matter:
Abe GIVINS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant v. James J. BRISCO, Prosecuting Attorney, St. Charles County; Gwenda R. Robinson, Attorney; Carolyn C. Woods, Prosecuting Attorney; City of Town and Country; Patrick Kranz, Police Officer, Captain, Town and Country Police Department; John Nienhaus, Police Officer, Detective, Town and Country Police Department; Joan M. Gilmer, Circuit Clerk, St. Louis County, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 12-3847.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: June 24, 2013.
Filed: June 27, 2013.
Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Abe Givins appeals the district court's preservice dismissal of his complaint, without prejudice, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Upon careful de novo review, see LeMay v. U.S. Postal Serv., 450 F.3d 797, 799 (8th Cir.2006) (de novo review of dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction), we find no basis for reversal, see Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(h)(3) (if court determines at any time that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction, court must dismiss action); Biscanin v. Merrill Lynch & Co., 407 F.3d 905, 907 (8th Cir.2005) ("[i]f the asserted basis of federal jurisdiction is patently meritless, then dismissal for lack of jurisdiction is appropriate"). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny all of Givins's pending motions.
. The Honorable Charles A. Shaw, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.