Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Terrell WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-08-06
Citations: 476 F. App'x 102
Docket Number: No. 11-1711
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Terrell WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 476
Pages: 102–103

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Terrell WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-1711.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 6, 2012.
Filed: Aug. 6, 2012.
Allison Hart Behrens, Patrick T. Judge, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, St. Louis, MO, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee.
Levell D. Littleton, St. Louis, MO, for Defendant-Appellant.
Terrell Williams, Kinloch, MO, pro se.
Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
On September 30, 2010, Terrell Williams pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute fifty grams or more of cocaine base (crack), in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 846 and punishable under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1). The offense conduct all had occurred by June 3, 2010. The Fair Sentencing Act (FSA), which amended the threshold quantities of crack cocaine for triggering mandatory minimum sentences under § 841, became effective on August 3, 2010. Williams's sentencing occurred on March 17, 2011. The district court ruled that the FSA did not apply to conduct predating the Act's effective date and sentenced Williams to the pre-FSA mandatory minimum sentence of ten years' imprisonment. Williams appealed and we affirmed the sentence, concluding that circuit precedent foreclosed his retroactivity argument. See United States v. Sidney, 648 F.3d 904, 910 (8th Cir.2011).
Williams subsequently filed a petition for rehearing by panel and for rehearing en banc, which we stayed pending resolution by the Supreme Court on whether the FSA applies retroactively to defendants whose conduct occurred before its enactment, but who were sentenced after its enactment. The Supreme Court answered the question on June 21, 2012, holding that "the [FSA's] more lenient penalty provisions apply to offenders who committed a crack cocaine crime before August 3, 2010, but were not sentenced until after August 3." Dorsey v. United States, — U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 2321, 2326, 183 L.Ed.2d 250 (2012).
In light of Dorsey, we now grant Williams's petition for rehearing by panel and vacate our previous opinion and judgment in this case, United States v. Williams, 455 Fed.Appx. 704 (8th Cir. 2012). We also vacate Williams's sentence and remand the case to the district court for resentencing consistent with the Supreme Court's ruling in Dorsey.