Case Name: STEIN'S, Stein's Mfg. Co., and Lou Stein, P.C., Appellants, v. Arlton PILLING, Postmaster, Woodbury, New Jersey
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1967-06-06
Citations: 379 F.2d 554
Docket Number: No. 16204
Parties: STEIN’S, Stein’s Mfg. Co., and Lou Stein, P.C., Appellants, v. Arlton PILLING, Postmaster, Woodbury, New Jersey.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 379
Pages: 554–555

Head Matter:
STEIN’S, Stein’s Mfg. Co., and Lou Stein, P.C., Appellants, v. Arlton PILLING, Postmaster, Woodbury, New Jersey.
No. 16204.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued May 26, 1967.
Decided June 6, 1967.
Rehearing Denied July 25, 1967.
Mitchell S. Lipschutz, Philadelphia, Pa., Barry M. Weinberg, Camden, N. J., Mitchell S. Lipschutz, Lipschutz & Levy, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellants.
Robert W. Page, Asst. U. S. Atty., Camden, N. J., David M. Satz, Jr., U. S. Atty., Newark, N. J., Robert W. Page, Asst. U. S. Atty., on the brief, for ap-pellee.
Before McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
PER CURIAM.
In the instant case plaintiff appellants sought injunctive relief below against the enforcement of a United States Post Office Department Order, intercepting plaintiffs' mail for fraudulent violation of Title 39 U.S.C.A. § 4005.
The District Court, after extensive hearing, entered an Order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant-appellee Arlton Pilling, Postmaster at Woodbury, New Jersey, and dismissed the complaint with prejudice.
On review of the record we find no error. The Order of the District Court will be affirmed for the reasons so well stated by Judge Cohen in his opinion reported at 256 F.Supp. 238 (D.C.N.J. 1966).