Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio OWENS, a/k/a Tonio, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-02-02
Citations: 710 F. App'x 181
Docket Number: No. 17-7498
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio OWENS, a/k/a Tonio, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 710
Pages: 181–181

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio OWENS, a/k/a Tonio, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 17-7498
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: January 30, 2018
Decided: February 2, 2018
Antonio Owens, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Drake, Acting United States Attorney, John C. Potterfield, Jane Barrett Taylor, Assistant United States Attorneys, William Camden Lewis, Columbia, South Carolina, Carrie Fisher Sherard, Leesa Washington, Assistant United States Attorneys, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Antonio Owens appeals the district • court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. See United States v. Owens, No. 3:02-cr-00548-CMC-26 (D.S.C. Oct. 27, 2017); see also U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 1B1.10(b)(2) (2016) (providing that a district court may not impose a sentence below the bottom of an amended Guidelines range unless the original term of imprisonment was below the original Guidelines range as a result of a Government motion for a substantial assistance reduction). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal- contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.
AFFIRMED