Case Name: Bridgeport Brass Company, complainant, v. Feuser & Sullivan, Incorporated, a corporation, defendant; Green & Green, appellants
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1936-04-24
Citations: 120 N.J. Eq. 200
Docket Number: 
Parties: Bridgeport Brass Company, complainant, v. Feuser & Sullivan, Incorporated, a corporation, defendant; Green & Green, appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 120
Pages: 200–200

Head Matter:
Bridgeport Brass Company, complainant, v. Feuser & Sullivan, Incorporated, a corporation, defendant; Green & Green, appellants.
[Argued February term, 1936.
Decided April 24th, 1936.]
Messrs. Green & Green, pro se, for the appellants.
Mr. Michael G. Alenick, for Feuser & Sullivan, Incorporated.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The appeal is from an order denying an application for counsel fee in resisting an adjudication of insolvency, and from an order denying a claim for alleged services in collecting certain accounts receivable of .the defendant corporation.
A careful examination of the record satisfies us that the orders complained of were entered pursuant to the exercise of a sound discretion and they are, therefore, affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hei-ier, Perseie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, JJ. 12.
For reversal — Hone. .