Case Name: John M. RICKS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Michael A. LANSING, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-07-20
Citations: 14 F. App'x 235
Docket Number: No. 01-6859
Parties: John M. RICKS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Michael A. LANSING, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 14
Pages: 235–235

Head Matter:
John M. RICKS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Michael A. LANSING, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 01-6859.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 12, 2001.
Decided July 20, 2001.
John M. Ricks, pro se. Richard Parker, Rachel Celia Ballow, Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, VA, for appellee.
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
John M. Ricks appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Ricks v. Lansing, No. CA-01-119-AM (E.D.Va. Apr. 23, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.