Case Name: Theodore E. POWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RICHMOND CITY PUBLIC SCHOOL BOARD; Howard Hopkins, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-02-10
Citations: 86 F. App'x 653
Docket Number: No. 03-2044
Parties: Theodore E. POWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RICHMOND CITY PUBLIC SCHOOL BOARD; Howard Hopkins, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 86
Pages: 653–653

Head Matter:
Theodore E. POWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RICHMOND CITY PUBLIC SCHOOL BOARD; Howard Hopkins, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 03-2044.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 21, 2004.
Decided Feb. 10, 2004.
Theodore E. Powell, Appellant pro se.
Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed as modified by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Theodore E. Powell appeals the district court's order dismissing his complaint with prejudice. We agree with the district court that Powell is precluded from relitigating his wrongful termination and disparate discipline claims against the Richmond City Public School Board and Howard Hopkins, as these claims were previously adjudicated on the merits against the same parties. Powell v. Richmond City School Board, No. CA-98-797 (E.D.Va. July 21, 1999); see Grausz v. Englander, 321 F.3d 467, 472 (4th Cir.2003). Accordingly, we affirm this portion of the district court's order.
To the extent that Powell sought to name as Defendants two individual Human Resources officers, asserting they have prevented him from securing other employment, this claim was not litigated in Powell's prior federal action, and it is not clear from the record that this claim is time barred. However, as the claim involved a matter of a state law, the district court was not required to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over it. We modify the district court's order to dismiss this claim without prejudice.
We grant Powell's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED