Case Name: Dwight RICHARDSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. B. YOUNG, Lieutenant; H. Bowers, Lieutenant; Thomas McIntyre, Sergeant; Phillip Krauss, Officer; Timothy Stickley, Officer; Mark Raley, Officer; Stanley Raley, Officer; D. Cowan, Officer; Troy Hamilton, Officer; Marsha Bittner, Nurse, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-02-21
Citations: 26 F. App'x 376
Docket Number: No. 01-7659
Parties: Dwight RICHARDSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. B. YOUNG, Lieutenant; H. Bowers, Lieutenant; Thomas McIntyre, Sergeant; Phillip Krauss, Officer; Timothy Stickley, Officer; Mark Raley, Officer; Stanley Raley, Officer; D. Cowan, Officer; Troy Hamilton, Officer; Marsha Bittner, Nurse, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 26
Pages: 376–377

Head Matter:
Dwight RICHARDSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. B. YOUNG, Lieutenant; H. Bowers, Lieutenant; Thomas McIntyre, Sergeant; Phillip Krauss, Officer; Timothy Stickley, Officer; Mark Raley, Officer; Stanley Raley, Officer; D. Cowan, Officer; Troy Hamilton, Officer; Marsha Bittner, Nurse, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 01-7659.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 6, 2002.
Decided Feb. 21, 2002.
Dwight Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Sharon Stanley Street, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland; Phillip Melton Andrews, George Eugene Brown, Kramon & Graham, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Dwight Richardson appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Richardson v. Young, No. CA-00-2457-L (D.Md. Sept. 4, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.