Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Donald HUMPHREY, Defendant-Appellant; Donald HUMPHREY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1992-06-23
Citations: 846 S.W.2d 203
Docket Number: Nos. 58993, 60746
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Donald HUMPHREY, Defendant-Appellant. Donald HUMPHREY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 846
Pages: 203–203

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Donald HUMPHREY, Defendant-Appellant. Donald HUMPHREY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 58993, 60746.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
June 23, 1992.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 30, 1992.
Case Transferred to Supreme Court Sept. 22, 1992.
Case Retransferred to Court of Appeals Feb. 23, 1993.
Original Opinion Reinstated March 4, 1993.
Jeannie Arterburn, St. Louis, for defendant-appellant.
William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Robert Alan Kelly, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff-respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Donald Humphrey, appeals from the judgment of the trial court sentencing him to two concurrent terms for possession of burglar's tools and attempted burglary, second degree. He also appeals from the judgment denying his post-conviction claims after oral argument. We have reviewed the record and find that an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgments of the trial and motion courts are affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).