Case Name: WILLIAM M. AHIA, A. R. CUNHA, BEN HOLLINGER AND E. W. QUINN, AS CITIZENS AND TAX-PAYERS AND AS QUALIFIED AND ACTING SUPERVISORS OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, AND COLLECTIVELY CONSTITUTING A MAJORITY OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF SAID CITY AND COUNTY, v. LEWIS ABSHIRE
Court: Supreme Court of the Territory of Hawaii
Jurisdiction: Hawaii
Decision Date: 1924-05-09
Citations: 27 Haw. 791
Docket Number: No. 1534
Parties: WILLIAM M. AHIA, A. R. CUNHA, BEN HOLLINGER AND E. W. QUINN, AS CITIZENS AND TAX-PAYERS AND AS QUALIFIED AND ACTING SUPERVISORS OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, AND COLLECTIVELY CONSTITUTING A MAJORITY OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF SAID CITY AND COUNTY, v. LEWIS ABSHIRE.
Judges: Peters, C. J., Perry and Lindsay, JJ.
Reporter: Hawaii Reports
Volume: 27
Pages: 791–791

Head Matter:
WILLIAM M. AHIA, A. R. CUNHA, BEN HOLLINGER AND E. W. QUINN, AS CITIZENS AND TAX-PAYERS AND AS QUALIFIED AND ACTING SUPERVISORS OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, AND COLLECTIVELY CONSTITUTING A MAJORITY OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF SAID CITY AND COUNTY, v. LEWIS ABSHIRE.
No. 1534.
Reserved Questions from Circuit Judge First Circuit.
Hon. R. J. O’Brien, Judge.
Broion, Gristy & Davis for petitioners.
Smith é Wild for respondent.
Submitted April 10, 1924.
Decided May 9, 1924.
Peters, C. J., Perry and Lindsay, JJ.

Opinion:
Per Ouriam.
The question, reserved, "Should the demurrer be sustained," is answered in the affirmative upon the authority of Ahia v. Cain, 27 Haw. 770.