Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JAMIE MARIE ANDERSON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2014-08-27
Citations: 265 Or. App. 222
Docket Number: C112615CR; A152628
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JAMIE MARIE ANDERSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Nakamoto, Judge, and Egan, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 265
Pages: 222–223

Head Matter:
On appellant’s petition for reconsideration filed July 14,
reconsideration allowed; former opinion (264 Or App 183, 331 P3d 1052) modified and adhered to as modified August 27,
petition for review denied December 11, 2014 (356 Or 575)
STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JAMIE MARIE ANDERSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Washington County Circuit Court
C112615CR; A152628
333 P3d 1250
Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, and Kyle Krohn, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, for petition.
Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Nakamoto, Judge, and Egan, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant has petitioned for reconsideration in this case because, notwithstanding that the disposition of our opinion said that we had affirmed defendant's convictions except to the extent that we had otherwise reversed and remanded them, our opinion did not expressly state that we had considered two of her three assignments of error on their merits. We did consider and reject those assignments on their merits. We modify the last sentence in the opinion before the disposition to read: "Accordingly, we do not believe that remand on the issue of venue is appropriate in this case, and we reject defendant's second and third assignments on their merits without further discussion." We adhere to our opinion, as modified.
Reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified and adhered to as modified.