Case Name: DANIEL LANGBERG, RESPONDENT, v. WILKINSON, GADDIS AND COMPANY, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1913-11-17
Citations: 85 N.J.L. 377
Docket Number: 
Parties: DANIEL LANGBERG, RESPONDENT, v. WILKINSON, GADDIS AND COMPANY, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 85
Pages: 377–377

Head Matter:
DANIEL LANGBERG, RESPONDENT, v. WILKINSON, GADDIS AND COMPANY, APPELLANT.
Submitted July 7, 1913
Decided November 17, 1913.
On appeal from the Supreme Court.
Eor the appellant, Coult & Smith.
Por the respondent, Charles Elin.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion promulgated by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Bergen, Voorhees, Kalisch, Yrbdenburgh, Congdon, White, Tbrhunb, Heppenheimer, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.