Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Massoud NOUSHFAR; Zohreh Shayesteh and Kamran Shayesteh, Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1998-04-01
Citations: 140 F.3d 1244
Docket Number: Nos. 94-30229, 94-30350 and 94-30353
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Massoud NOUSHFAR; Zohreh Shayesteh and Kamran Shayesteh, Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 140
Pages: 1244–1245

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Massoud NOUSHFAR; Zohreh Shayesteh and Kamran Shayesteh, Defendants-Appellants.
Nos. 94-30229, 94-30350 and 94-30353.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
April 1, 1998.

Opinion:
ORDER
The Opinion filed on March 20, 1996, 78 F.3d 1442 (9th Cir.1996), is amended as follows:
The first sentence of the final paragraph on page 1445 of the opinion as published, beginning with "In Riley v. Deeds. .," is replaced to read:
In Riley v. Deeds, 56 F.3d 1117, 1121 (9th Cir.1995), we found structural error when testimony was reread in court without the judge present and with his clerk "presiding."