Case Name: David SKAGGS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-10-24
Citations: 33 S.W.3d 596
Docket Number: No. ED 77283
Parties: David SKAGGS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before MOONEY, P.J., SIMON, J„ and SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 33
Pages: 596–596

Head Matter:
David SKAGGS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 77283.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Oct. 24, 2000.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 29, 2000.
Application for Transfer Denied Jan. 23, 2001.
Douglas R. Hoff, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Daniel W. Follett, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before MOONEY, P.J., SIMON, J„ and SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
David Skaggs ("Movant") appeals from a judgment denying without an evidentiary hearing his motion for post-conviction relief filed under Rule 29.15. Movant claims ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court's judgment is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo.R.Crim.P. 2000, unless otherwise indicated.