Case Name: DAVID McKIBBIN, Appellant, v. FRANK C. SYKES et al., Respondents
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1924-10-22
Citations: 69 Cal. App. 792
Docket Number: Civ. No. 4981
Parties: DAVID McKIBBIN, Appellant, v. FRANK C. SYKES et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports
Volume: 69
Pages: 792–792

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 4981.
First Appellate District, Division One.
October 22, 1924.]
DAVID McKIBBIN, Appellant, v. FRANK C. SYKES et al., Respondents.
Sloss, Ackerman & Bradley for Appellant.
George Lull, City Attorney, and Maurice T. Dooling, Jr., Assistant 'City Attorney, for Respondents.

Opinion:
St. SURE, J.
The question involved in this ease is in-all respects similar to that in Hurley v. Sykes et al., ante, p. 310 [231 Pac. 748]. Upon the authority of that case it is ordered that the' judgment he reversed and that a decree be entered in favor of appellant, with the direction that the writ issue.
Tyler, P. J., and Knight, J., concurred.