Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tyrone CLARK, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-05-25
Citations: 10 F. App'x 176
Docket Number: No. 01-6255
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tyrone CLARK, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 10
Pages: 176–176

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tyrone CLARK, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 01-6255.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 17, 2001.
Decided May 25, 2001.
Tyrone Clark, pro se.
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Tyrone Clark appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of his sentence under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c) West 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Clark, No. CR-91-310-JFM (D.Md. Jan. 17, 2001). To the extent that Clark presents new issues on appeal, we note that such claims are not properly presented in a motion for reduction of sentence under § 3582 and are not properly raised for the first time on appeal. See 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c); United States v. Maxton, 940 F.2d 103, 105 (4th Cir.1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.