Case Name: REALTY HOLDING INC. et v. STATE ex BELL
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1926-09-04
Citations: 4 Ohio Law Abs. 756
Docket Number: No. 20086
Parties: REALTY HOLDING INC. et v. STATE ex BELL
Judges: 
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 4
Pages: 756–757

Head Matter:
REALTY HOLDING INC. et v. STATE ex BELL
No. 20086.
Supreme Court
Dock. Sept. 4, 1926;
4 Abs. 623.

Opinion:
The Holding Co. in the Supreme Court con tends that the Court of Appeals has no power upon a quo warranto, to oust corporation from doing business in state because it permitted gambling, or to grant temporary restraining order forbidding same company to conduct business in furtherance of its unlawful conduct.
Attorneys — Joseph Heintzman; and Pogue, Hoffheimer & Pogue for Company; Chas. S. Bell for State ex; all of Cincinnati.