Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ROBYN KAY KENNEDY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2008-09-03
Citations: 222 Or. App. 204
Docket Number: C053470CR; A133510
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ROBYN KAY KENNEDY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Sercombe, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 222
Pages: 204–205

Head Matter:
Submitted July 3,
reversed September 3, 2008
STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ROBYN KAY KENNEDY, Defendant-Appellant.
Washington County Circuit Court
C053470CR; A133510
192 P3d 843
Erin Galli and Chilton, Ebbett & Galli, LLC filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Michael R. Washington, Senior Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Sercombe, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant was convicted of one count of unauthorized use of a vehicle, ORS 164.135, for riding on the back of a motorcycle that had been stolen by her boyfriend. On appeal, defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying her motion for a judgment of acquittal on that count, because the record is insufficient to establish that defendant knew that the motorcycle had been stolen. The state concedes that the trial court erred in that regard. We agree and accept the state's concession.
Reversed.