Case Name: LUMA CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STRYKER CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, and Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Inc., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-10-23
Citations: 208 F. App'x 837
Docket Number: No. 2006-1642
Parties: LUMA CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STRYKER CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, and Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 208
Pages: 837–837

Head Matter:
This case was not selected for publication in the Federal Reporter
NOTE: Pursuant to Fed. Cir. R. 47.6, this order is not citable as precedent. It is a public order.
LUMA CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STRYKER CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, and Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 2006-1642.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Oct. 23, 2006.

Opinion:
ORDER
Upon consideration of Luma Corporation's unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss its appeal, for lack of jurisdiction,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) The motion is granted.
(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.