Case Name: Quigg v. City of Philadelphia, Appellant
Court: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1934-04-23
Citations: 113 Pa. Super. 102
Docket Number: Appeal No. 248
Parties: Quigg v. City of Philadelphia, Appellant.
Judges: Before Trexler, P. J., Keller, Cunningham, Baldrige, Stadteeld, Parker and James, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania Superior Court Reports
Volume: 113
Pages: 102–103

Head Matter:
Quigg v. City of Philadelphia, Appellant.
Argued December 15, 1933.
Before Trexler, P. J., Keller, Cunningham, Baldrige, Stadteeld, Parker and James, JJ.
Thomas B. K. Ringe, and with him Ernest Lowengrund, Assistant City Solicitors, and David J. Smyth, City Solicitor, for appellant
Martin Feldman, for appellee.
April 23, 1934:

Opinion:
Opinion bt
Cunningham, J.,
The same, and only the same, questions are involved in this appeal as were involved in the appeal of Joseph D. Egan v. City of Philadelphia, 113 Pa. Superior Ct. 93, except that in the present case there was but one suspension, beginning July 10, and extending to December 31,1931. The amount here claimed was, therefore, $1,044, with interest, and the court below entered judgment in favor of the plaintiff for $1,101.
For the reasons stated at length in the opinion this day filed in the Egan case the judgment here appealed from is affirmed, subject to a reduction of $180 from its principal ¡sum.
Judgment modified and affirmed.