Case Name: Wesley JOHNSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-10-06
Citations: 605 So. 2d 179
Docket Number: No. 91-315
Parties: Wesley JOHNSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, BASKIN and GODERICH, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 605
Pages: 179–179

Head Matter:
Wesley JOHNSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 91-315.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 6, 1992.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and John H. Lipinski, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Giselle D. Lylen, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.
Before BARKDULL, BASKIN and GODERICH, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Correll v. State, 523 So.2d 562 (Fla.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 871, 109 S.Ct. 183, 102 L.Ed.2d 152 (1988); Bertolotti v. Dugger, 514 So.2d 1095 (Fla.1987). Compare State v. James, 404 So.2d 1181, 1182 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981) (upon complete destruction of evidence by the state, "defendant generally must show that the destruction of evidence resulted in some demonstrable prejudice to him.").