Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alejandro Yliz AGUIRRE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-03-09
Citations: 420 F. App'x 678
Docket Number: No. 10-50226
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alejandro Yliz AGUIRRE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 420
Pages: 678–678

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alejandro Yliz AGUIRRE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-50226.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 15, 2011.
Filed March 9, 2011.
Bruce R. Castetter, Matthew John Gardner, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Timothy Allen Scott, Law Offices of Timothy A. Scott, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Alejandro Yliz Aguirre, San Diego, CA, pro se.
Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Alejandro Yliz Aguirre appeals from his conviction for various drug offenses. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Aguirre contends that the district court's instruction to the grand jury violated the Fifth Amendment by improperly limiting the grand jury's discretion. This contention fails because the instructions here substantially mirrored those approved in United States v. Cortez-Rivera, 454 F.3d 1038, 1040 (9th Cir.2006), and United States v. Navarro-Vargas, 408 F.3d 1184 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.