Case Name: Milton C. David et al., Appellants, v. Cornelius Company, Respondent and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Firestone Tire and Rubber Company et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1991-06-07
Citations: 174 A.D.2d 1021
Docket Number: 
Parties: Milton C. David et al., Appellants, v Cornelius Company, Respondent and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Firestone Tire and Rubber Company et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 174
Pages: 1021–1021

Head Matter:
Milton C. David et al., Appellants, v Cornelius Company, Respondent and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Firestone Tire and Rubber Company et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents.

Opinion:
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment in favor of defendant. Plaintiffs failed to controvert unequivocal evidence submitted by defendant that it did not manufacture a Model 85-5 beverage tank and that it imprinted its name on every beverage tank it manufactured. Thus, defendant could not have distributed or sold the beverage tank which allegedly caused the injury. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Cayuga County, Corning, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.