Case Name: Howard S. Ives, Highway Commissioner v. Carl E. Burgess
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1967-06-26
Citations: 155 Conn. 698
Docket Number: 
Parties: Howard S. Ives, Highway Commissioner v. Carl E. Burgess
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 155
Pages: 698–699

Head Matter:
Howard S. Ives, Highway Commissioner v. Carl E. Burgess
King, C. J., Alcorn, House, Cotter and Ryan, Js.
Argued June 13
decided June 26, 1967
Joseph E. Moukawsher, for the appellant (defendant).
Clement J. Kichuk, assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, were Harold M. Mulvey, attorney general, and Jack Rubin, assistant attorney general, for the appellee (plaintiff).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The highway commissioner agreed with the defendant, the owner of the equity, on a price for the acquisition of real estate for highway purposes. A holder of an encumbrance on the property refused to join in the agreement. This refusal caused the commissioner, on January 27, 1962, to take the property by condemnation, assessing damages in the same amount as previously agreed upon with the defendant. There was no appeal from the taking. Compensation for the property was not deposited with the clerk of the Superior Court until May 10, 1965. The defendant is entitled to interest on the damages assessed, covering the period from January 27, 1962, to May 10, 1965, amounting to the sum of $4923.33.
In disposing of this appeal, we have treated it as it was presented by the parties, disregarding, as did they, certain technical, procedural problems and irregularities and deciding the appeal solely on the basic right of the defendant to recover interest on the condemnation award as claimed. Anselmo v. Cox, 135 Conn. 78, 79, 60 A.2d 767, cert. denied, 335 U.S. 859, 69 S. Ct. 132, 93 L. Ed. 405.
There is error, the decision is set aside and the matter is remanded with direction to grant the motion and order payment of interest in accordance with this opinion.