Case Name: David E. SMITH, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2019-05-07
Citations: 579 S.W.3d 259
Docket Number: No. ED 106564
Parties: David E. SMITH, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Mary K. Hoff, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 579
Pages: 259–260

Head Matter:
David E. SMITH, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 106564
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
FILED: May 7, 2019
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied June 11, 2019
Application for Transfer Denied September 3, 2019
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: Amy Elizabeth Lowe, Office of the State Public Defender, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.
ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT: Eric Schmitt, Attorney General, Daniel Neal McPherson, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.
Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Mary K. Hoff, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
David E. Smith appeals from the motion court's "Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Order, Judgment, and Decree of Court on Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Conviction and Sentence Pursuant to Rule 29.15" denying his "Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentences," following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).