Case Name: Larry HAMAN, Appellant, v. ROYAL OAKS CHRYSLER/JEEP and Division of Employment Security, Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2007-03-13
Citations: 216 S.W.3d 702
Docket Number: No. ED 87797
Parties: Larry HAMAN, Appellant, v. ROYAL OAKS CHRYSLER/JEEP and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 216
Pages: 702–703

Head Matter:
Larry HAMAN, Appellant, v. ROYAL OAKS CHRYSLER/JEEP and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.
No. ED 87797.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
March 13, 2007.
Larry Haman, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Marilyn Green, Jefferson City, MO, Aaron M. Staebell, St. Peters, MO, for respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Larry Haman ("Claimant") appeals from the order of the Labor and Industrial Commission ("Commission") denying his claim for unemployment compensation. The Commission found that Royal Oaks Chrysler/Dodge ("Employer") had good cause for failing to participate in a telephone hearing in September 2005, and that Claimant did not quit with good cause, and was disqualified from receiving benefits.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their in formation only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).