Case Name: The City of Philadelphia to use of W. P. Clement and George W. Ruch, trading as Clement & Ruch, v. The Philadelphia & Frankford Railroad Company, Owner and Registered Owner, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1896-10-05
Citations: 177 Pa. 300
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 33
Parties: The City of Philadelphia to use of W. P. Clement and George W. Ruch, trading as Clement & Ruch, v. The Philadelphia & Frankford Railroad Company, Owner and Registered Owner, Appellant.
Judges: Before Sterrett, C. J., Green, McCollum, Mitchell and Dean, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 177
Pages: 300–301

Head Matter:
The City of Philadelphia to use of W. P. Clement and George W. Ruch, trading as Clement & Ruch, v. The Philadelphia & Frankford Railroad Company, Owner and Registered Owner, Appellant.
October 5, 1896 :
Argued March 26, 1896.
Appeal, No. 33, Jan. T., 1896, by defendant, from order of C. P. No. 3, Phila. Co., March T., 1895, No. 172, M. L. D., making absolute a rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense.
Before Sterrett, C. J., Green, McCollum, Mitchell and Dean, JJ.
Affirmed.
Mitchell, J., dissents.
Thomas Hart, Jr., for appellant.
Charles H. Edmunds, for appellee.

Opinion:
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Dean,
This appeal raises the same questions as those in case of same plaintiff to use of John McCann.v. same defendant, supra, 292, opinion handed down this day.
The judgment is affirmed for same reasons.