Case Name: Louis OSSINSKY, Sr., and Joseph D. Krol, Appellants, v. Dayton NANCE, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1960-01-14
Citations: 118 So. 2d 47
Docket Number: No. B-131
Parties: Louis OSSINSKY, Sr., and Joseph D. Krol, Appellants, v. Dayton NANCE, Appellee.
Judges: WIGGINTON, C. J., and STURGIS, J., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 118
Pages: 47–49

Head Matter:
Louis OSSINSKY, Sr., and Joseph D. Krol, Appellants, v. Dayton NANCE, Appellee.
No. B-131.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.
Jan. 14, 1960.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 11, 1960.
Ossinsky & Krol, Daytona Beach, for appellants.
Kinsey, Vincent & Pyle, Daytona Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Finding no error in entry of summary judgment in favor of the appellee, plaintiff below, the same is hereby affirmed.
On the appellee's cross-assignment of error, directed to the fact that the costs of the proceeding were taxed against appellee who prevailed in the lower court, Section 58.04, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., provides that the party recovering the judgment shall recover also on his legal costs and charges. This statutory provision follows the general rule that costs follow the result of the litigation. It was therefore error to tax the costs of this proceeding against the appellee and in that particular the cause is remanded with directions to enter an order taxing the costs against the appellants.
Affirmed in part, reversed in .part with directions.
WIGGINTON, C. J., and STURGIS, J., concur.
CARROLL, DONALD K., J., concurring in part and dissenting in part.