Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. UNIT NO. 7 AND UNIT NO. 8 OF SHOP IN the GROVE CONDOMINIUM, etc., et al., Appellees; UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. LOTS 1, 4 AND 5, BLOCK 3, BRUSH CREEK VILLAGE, et al., Appellees; UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. LOT 1, OF SUNSET HAVEN, etc., Appellee; UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Stanley Carter KISER, Appellee; UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. The SOUTH HALF OF LOT 7 AND LOT 8, BLOCK 14, etc., et al., Appellees; William Lloyd HILL, Appellee, v. A.L. LOCKHART, etc., Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1989-08-11
Citations: 883 F.2d 53
Docket Number: Nos. 87-2499 to 87-2502, 88-2212 and 88-2237
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. UNIT NO. 7 AND UNIT NO. 8 OF SHOP IN the GROVE CONDOMINIUM, etc., et al., Appellees. UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. LOTS 1, 4 AND 5, BLOCK 3, BRUSH CREEK VILLAGE, et al., Appellees. UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. LOT 1, OF SUNSET HAVEN, etc., Appellee. UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Stanley Carter KISER, Appellee. UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. The SOUTH HALF OF LOT 7 AND LOT 8, BLOCK 14, etc., et al., Appellees. William Lloyd HILL, Appellee, v. A.L. LOCKHART, etc., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 883
Pages: 53–54

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. UNIT NO. 7 AND UNIT NO. 8 OF SHOP IN the GROVE CONDOMINIUM, etc., et al., Appellees. UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. LOTS 1, 4 AND 5, BLOCK 3, BRUSH CREEK VILLAGE, et al., Appellees. UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. LOT 1, OF SUNSET HAVEN, etc., Appellee. UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Stanley Carter KISER, Appellee. UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. The SOUTH HALF OF LOT 7 AND LOT 8, BLOCK 14, etc., et al., Appellees. William Lloyd HILL, Appellee, v. A.L. LOCKHART, etc., Appellant.
Nos. 87-2499 to 87-2502, 88-2212 and 88-2237.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Aug. 11, 1989.

Opinion:
The petitions for rehearing with suggestions for rehearing en banc filed by the appellants in the above cases have been considered by the court and are hereby granted. The prior opinions and judgments entered by this court in these appeals are vacated.