Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. William Hallman, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1998-06-16
Citations: 92 N.Y.2d 840
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William Hallman, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 92
Pages: 840–842

Head Matter:
[699 NE2d 423, 677 NYS2d 64]
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William Hallman, Appellant.
Decided June 16, 1998
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Paul Liu, New York City, and Daniel L. Greenberg for appellant.
Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney of New York County, New York City (Maura E. Daly of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. A determination of whether exigent circumstances existed to justify the warrantless entry and arrest of defendant involves a mixed question of law and fact. Where, as here, there exists record support for the Appellate Division's resolution of this question, the issue is beyond this Court's further review.
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick and Wesley concur.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed in a memorandum.