Case Name: Golden Rod Jewelry Manufacturing, Inc., Respondent-Appellant, v. Assicurazioni Generali et al., Appellants-Respondents, and George Honig & Son, Inc., et al., Defendants
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1989-01-17
Citations: 73 N.Y.2d 867
Docket Number: 
Parties: Golden Rod Jewelry Manufacturing, Inc., Respondent-Appellant, v Assicurazioni Generali et al., Appellants-Respondents, and George Honig & Son, Inc., et al., Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 73
Pages: 867–867

Head Matter:
Golden Rod Jewelry Manufacturing, Inc., Respondent-Appellant, v Assicurazioni Generali et al., Appellants-Respondents, and George Honig & Son, Inc., et al., Defendants.
Submitted November 7, 1988;
decided January 17, 1989

Opinion:
Motion insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as affirmed the October 28, 1986 Supreme Court order denying summary judgment dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion and cross motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.