Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Donald Phinazee, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2017-01-12
Citations: 146 A.D.3d 531
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Donald Phinazee, Appellant.
Judges: Sweeny, J.P., Renwick, Mazzarelli, Manzanet-Daniels and Feinman, JJ.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 146
Pages: 531–532

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Donald Phinazee, Appellant.
[43 NYS3d 904]

Opinion:
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael J. Obús, J.), rendered December 11, 2014, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of 10 years, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant's challenges to his plea do not come within the narrow exception to the preservation requirement (see People v Conceicao, 26 NY3d 375, 382 [2015]). Even if defendant may be deemed to have moved to withdraw his plea, he did not make any of the claims he makes on appeal, despite his opportunity to do so. We decline to review defendant's unpreserved claims in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find that the record as a whole establishes that the plea was knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily made. The circumstances of the plea were not coercive (see People v Fiumefreddo, 82 NY2d 536, 544 [1993]), defendant's factual allocution did not cast doubt on his guilt, and the court's omission of one of defendant's rights under Boykin v Alabama (395 US 238 [1969]) did not invalidate the plea (see People v Sougou, 26 NY3d 1052 [2015]). Concur
Sweeny, J.P., Renwick, Mazzarelli, Manzanet-Daniels and Feinman, JJ.