Case Name: Jamie Jones CHANEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1968-07-02
Citations: 212 So. 2d 318
Docket Number: No. 68-36
Parties: Jamie Jones CHANEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and PEARSON and BARKDULL, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 212
Pages: 318–318

Head Matter:
Jamie Jones CHANEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 68-36.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
July 2, 1968.
Rehearing Denied July 25, 1968.
George Nicholas, Fred A. Jones, Jr., Miami, for appellant.
Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Jesse J. McCrary, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.
Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and PEARSON and BARKDULL, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Mrs. Chaney appeals her conviction for possession of lottery tickets. The appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the findings of guilt. She argues that the convictions should be reversed because the testimony given by the two police officers who arrested her and who were the only State witnesses at her non-jury trial conflicted. We hold that despite the conflict, the essential elements necessary to prove the charges against the appellant are present in the record. Therefore we shall not interfere with, the conclusions of the trial judge. See Eizenman v. State, Fla.App.1961, 132 So.2d 763, and cases cited therein. Cf. Miller v. State, Fla.App.1964, 170 So.2d 319.
Affirmed.