Case Name: State ex rel. Sciulli v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Appeals
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1993-12-30
Citations: 68 Ohio St. 3d 1422
Docket Number: 93-2535
Parties: State ex rel. Sciulli v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Appeals.
Judges: F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 68
Pages: 1422–1422

Head Matter:
Thursday, December 30, 1993
MOTION DOCKET
93-2535.
State ex rel. Sciulli v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Appeals.

Opinion:
In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for writs of mandamus and prohibition. Upon consideration of the motion of David A. and Joyce S. Kaufman to intervene as respondents,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to intervene be, and the same is hereby, granted.
F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents.
Upon consideration of the motion of intervenors, David A. and Joyce S. Kaufman, for immediate reconsideration of the alternative writ granted by this court on December 22, 1993,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for reconsideration be, and the same is hereby, denied.
Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.