Case Name: Bert V.E. PARKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. George TRENT; Donna Kuroski; Ashley Ginanni; John Doe, Unknown, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-12-28
Citations: 502 F. App'x 307
Docket Number: No. 12-7224
Parties: Bert V.E. PARKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. George TRENT; Donna Kuroski; Ashley Ginanni; John Doe, Unknown, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 502
Pages: 307–308

Head Matter:
Bert V.E. PARKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. George TRENT; Donna Kuroski; Ashley Ginanni; John Doe, Unknown, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 12-7224.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 21, 2012.
Decided: Dec. 28, 2012.
Bert V.E. Parker, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Llewellyn Deniker, Sara Ellen Hauptfuehrer, Steptoe & Johnson, PLLC, Bridgeport, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Bert V.E. Parker appeals the district court's orders adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, dismissing Parker's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint, and denying Parker's Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion to amend. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Parker v. Trent, No. l:10-cv-00120-IMK-DJJ (ND.W.Va. Jan. 10 & June 20, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.