Case Name: Contracting Plumbers' Cooperative Restoration Corporation, Appellant, v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1979-02-06
Citations: 46 N.Y.2d 857
Docket Number: 
Parties: Contracting Plumbers’ Cooperative Restoration Corporation, Appellant, v Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 46
Pages: 857–859

Head Matter:
Contracting Plumbers’ Cooperative Restoration Corporation, Appellant, v Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Respondent.
Argued January 2, 1979;
decided February 6, 1979
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Joel T. Camche and Robert N. Cooperman for appellant.
William F. Larkin for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (59 AD2d 921), noting that it is conceded that Interboro never performed any paving operations at the situs of the accidents.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg.