Case Name: William WAGNER, Employee/Appellant, v. William WAGNER, Employer/Respondent, and Commercial Union Insurance, Insurer/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-09-15
Citations: 976 S.W.2d 598
Docket Number: No. 73738
Parties: William WAGNER, Employee/Appellant, v. William WAGNER, Employer/Respondent, and Commercial Union Insurance, Insurer/Respondent.
Judges: Before HOFF, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 976
Pages: 598–598

Head Matter:
William WAGNER, Employee/Appellant, v. William WAGNER, Employer/Respondent, and Commercial Union Insurance, Insurer/Respondent.
No. 73738.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Sept. 15, 1998.
James F. McCartney, St. Louis, for appellant.
Susan M. Kelly, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before HOFF, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
In this workers' compensation case, William Wagner (Employee) appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) affirming the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), which awarded Employee permanent partial disability of 20 percent of the right wrist.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the Commission's award is supported by competent and substantial evidence and further, is not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence. Davis v. Research Medical Center, 903 S.W.2d 557, 565 (Mo.App.1995). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).