Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thurman YOUNG, a/k/a Charlie, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-02-11
Citations: 633 F. App'x 130
Docket Number: No. 15-7422
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thurman YOUNG, a/k/a Charlie, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 633
Pages: 130–131

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thurman YOUNG, a/k/a Charlie, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-7422.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 26, 2016.
Decided: Feb. 11, 2016.
Thurman Young, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Bradenham, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia; Dee Mullarkey Sterling, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before KING and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in'this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Thurman Young appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Young, No. 4:11-cr-00055-AWA-DEM-3 (E.D.Va. Aug. 28, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.