Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Matthew John WIGGINS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-01-29
Citations: 56 F. App'x 132
Docket Number: No. 02-4681
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Matthew John WIGGINS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 56
Pages: 132–133

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Matthew John WIGGINS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-4681.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 15, 2003.
Decided Jan. 29, 2003.
Mary Lou Newberger, Federal Public Defender, Edward H. Weis, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. Kasey Warner, United States Attorney, Stephanie D. Thacker, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Matthew John Wiggins appeals the district court's order revoking his term of supervised release and sentencing him to twelve months imprisonment, followed by twenty-four months of supervised release, to include home detention. Wiggins contends that his sentence exceeds the statutory maximum provided by 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) (2000). We find that the district court properly sentenced Wiggins within the statutory maximum. See United States v. Hager, 288 F.3d 136 (4th Cir.) (holding that a defendant does not receive credit against the maximum revocation prison term for time previously spent on home detention), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 391, 154 L.Ed.2d 317 (2002).
Accordingly, we affirm Wiggins' sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.