Case Name: THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. JUNIOR HATFIELD, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1902-03-03
Citations: 67 N.J.L. 354
Docket Number: 
Parties: THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. JUNIOR HATFIELD, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 67
Pages: 354–355

Head Matter:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. JUNIOR HATFIELD, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Argued November 20, 1901
Decided March 3, 1902.
On error to the Supreme Court.
For the plaintiff in error, Michael Dunn.
For the state, Eugene Emley, prosecutor of the pleas.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Two eases with the above title were argued together.
The judgment in each of them is affirmed, for the reasons given in the per curiam opinion of the Supreme Court. 37 Vroom 443.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Van Syckel, Garretson, Fort, Garretson, Pitney, Krueger, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees, Vroom. 12.
For reversal — None.