Case Name: Bart WIENER, Appellant, v. Charles H. POPE, Charles H. Pope and Associates, Inc., and Two Rivers Associates, Inc., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1985-12-17
Citations: 479 So. 2d 320
Docket Number: No. 85-503
Parties: Bart WIENER, Appellant, v. Charles H. POPE, Charles H. Pope and Associates, Inc., and Two Rivers Associates, Inc., Appellees.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 479
Pages: 320–320

Head Matter:
Bart WIENER, Appellant, v. Charles H. POPE, Charles H. Pope and Associates, Inc., and Two Rivers Associates, Inc., Appellees.
No. 85-503.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 17, 1985.
Bryson & Berman, P.A., and John E. Bergendahl, Miami, for appellant.
Jones & Foster, P.A., and Margaret L. Cooper and Neil Hayes, West Palm Beach, for appellees.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Bart Wiener, a broker, brought an action to recover his commission for brokering a mortgage loan. The trial court granted appellees' motion to dismiss on the stated basis that "since the construction mortgage loan contemplated by the commitment was never actually closed, the [complaint] failed to state a cause of action." This case is factually indistinguishable from S & D Enterprises, Inc. v. Sonnenblick-Goldman Southeast Corp., 310 So.2d 343 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975), and we reverse on that authority-
Reversed and remanded.