Case Name: Louis V. Verre et al., Appellants, v. Jose Rosas, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1979-05-10
Citations: 47 N.Y.2d 795
Docket Number: 
Parties: Louis V. Verre et al., Appellants, v Jose Rosas, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 47
Pages: 795–796

Head Matter:
Louis V. Verre et al., Appellants, v Jose Rosas, Respondent.
Submitted March 30, 1979;
decided May 10, 1979
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Walter G. Evans and Eugene Guarneri for appellants.
Francis J. Donovan for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Although plaintiffs satisfied the requirement that an affidavit of merit be submitted on an application to be relieved of their default, they offer no valid legal excuse for their delay. A summons was served just one week before the expiration of the three-year Statute of Limitations. Three and one-half months later defendants served a demand for a complaint. Plaintiffs ignored this demand for over 10 months and it was only when they were served with the present motion to dismiss that they were aroused to serve their pleading. As excuse for the default plaintiffs' attorneys advance only the assertion that they are engaged mostly in defense practice and that "this plaintiffs file was inadvertently not timely diaried for a complaint".
The absence of any reasonable excuse for plaintiffs' delay is determinative; there is no requisite that prejudice be shown before a motion to dismiss is granted in a case of this nature. Accordingly we cannot say that it was error to grant defendant's motion to dismiss the action as a matter of law.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg concur in a memorandum.
Order affirmed.