Case Name: Zelda Brodsky et al., Appellants, v. Hyman Brodsky et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1994-10-17
Citations: 208 A.D.2d 669
Docket Number: 
Parties: Zelda Brodsky et al., Appellants, v Hyman Brodsky et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 208
Pages: 669–669

Head Matter:
Zelda Brodsky et al., Appellants, v Hyman Brodsky et al., Respondents.
[618 NYS2d 536]

Opinion:
—In an action for declaratory judgment, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O'Brien, J.), dated September 8, 1992, which denied the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the plaintiffs' contention, we conclude that the Supreme Court's denial of the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction did not constitute an improvident exercise of discretion. There are sharp factual disputes as to key issues in the record which preclude a finding of a likelihood of success and irreparable injury at this juncture and which warrant the denial of the motion (see, Schneider Leasing Plus v Stallone, 172 AD2d 739; Network Fin. Planning v Prudential-Bache Sec., 194 AD2d 651, 652). Thompson, J. P., Miller, O'Brien, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.