Case Name: Reginald C. SWEAT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dorris COOK, Head Nurse, Individual and Official Capacity; Harry McKenn, Dr., Individual and Official Capacity, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-11-30
Citations: 402 F. App'x 807
Docket Number: No. 10-6595
Parties: Reginald C. SWEAT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dorris COOK, Head Nurse, Individual and Official Capacity; Harry McKenn, Dr., Individual and Official Capacity, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 402
Pages: 807–808

Head Matter:
Reginald C. SWEAT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dorris COOK, Head Nurse, Individual and Official Capacity; Harry McKenn, Dr., Individual and Official Capacity, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 10-6595.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 18, 2010.
Decided: Nov. 30, 2010.
Reginald C. Sweat, Appellant Pro Se. James E. Parham, Jr., Irmo, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Reginald C. Sweat appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sweat v. Cook, No. 9:09-cv-01255-HFF, 2010 WL 1444190 (D.S.C. Apr. 9, 2010). We deny Sweat's motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.