Case Name: In the Matter of the Compensation of Rodney G. McAleny, Claimant. Rodney G. McALENY, Petitioner on Review, v. MAX J. KUNEY CO., and SAIF Corporation, Respondents on Review
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2001-02-08
Citations: 331 Or. 596
Docket Number: WCB 95-09821; CA A95113; SC S44443
Parties: In the Matter of the Compensation of Rodney G. McAleny, Claimant. Rodney G. McALENY, Petitioner on Review, v. MAX J. KUNEY CO., and SAIF Corporation, Respondents on Review.
Judges: Before Carson, Chief Justice, and Gillette, Durham, Leeson, and Riggs, Justices.
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 331
Pages: 596–596

Head Matter:
On petition for review filed August 11, 1997,
petition for review allowed; decision of the Court of Appeals vacated and case remanded to the Workers’ Compensation Board for further proceedings February 8, 2001
In the Matter of the Compensation of Rodney G. McAleny, Claimant. Rodney G. McALENY, Petitioner on Review, v. MAX J. KUNEY CO., and SAIF Corporation, Respondents on Review.
(WCB 95-09821; CA A95113; SC S44443)
16 P3d 1154
No appearance contra.
Before Carson, Chief Justice, and Gillette, Durham, Leeson, and Riggs, Justices.
Judicial Review from the Workers’ Compensation Board, 149 Or App 212, 942 P2d 302 (19971.
Van Hoomissen, J., retired December 31, 2000, and did not participate in the decision of this case. Kulongoski and De Muniz, JJ., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated. The case is remanded to the Workers' Compensation Board for further proceedings in light of this court's decision in Robinson v. Nabisco, Inc., 331 Or 178, 11 P3d 1286 (2000).