Case Name: Alvy T. MCQUEEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; et al., Defendants, United States of America; United States Department of Justice, Including Its Named Components; United States Department of Treasury, Including Its Component Internal Revenue Service; Susie M. Wong; Mark W. Hughes; Crispin L. Smith; Angelo A. Fratttarelli, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-06-10
Citations: 100 F. App'x 964
Docket Number: No. 03-20977
Parties: Alvy T. MCQUEEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; et al., Defendants, United States of America; United States Department of Justice, Including Its Named Components; United States Department of Treasury, Including Its Component Internal Revenue Service; Susie M. Wong; Mark W. Hughes; Crispin L. Smith; Angelo A. Fratttarelli, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 100
Pages: 964–965

Head Matter:
Alvy T. MCQUEEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; et al., Defendants, United States of America; United States Department of Justice, Including Its Named Components; United States Department of Treasury, Including Its Component Internal Revenue Service; Susie M. Wong; Mark W. Hughes; Crispin L. Smith; Angelo A. Fratttarelli, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 03-20977.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
DECIDED: June 10, 2004.
John A. Townsend, Townsend & Jones, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Jonathan S. Cohen, Joan I. Oppenheimer, US Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Defendan1>-Appellee.
Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Alvy McQueen asserts a statutory action against the United States and a Bivens action against various government employees. The district court entered summary judgment for defendants, and McQueen appeals.
We have reviewed the briefs and pertinent portions of the record and have heard the arguments of counsel. We affirm, essentially for the reasons given by the district court. In summary, the statutory action is barred by limitations, and the district court committed no reversible error in finding immunity on the Bivens actions.
The district court properly denied McQueen a waiver of fees regarding his FOIA request. If, however, McQueen is willing to pay the fees, he is not barred from pursuing a FOIA request.
It is time for this aged litigation to be put to bed. The judgment is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set fort in 5th Cir. •R. 47.5.4.