Case Name: M.R. TAFFET and Robert M. Fierman, on Behalf of Themselves and all of the Persons, Corporations, Municipalities, and other Entities, other than the Defendants, who are Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The SOUTHERN CO., Southern Company Services, Inc., Alabama Power Company and Arthur Andersen & Co., Defendants-Appellees. Frederick Rodgers CARR, Carr Sales Company, O.E.M. Products, Inc., Timothy Dunn Stokely, III and all Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The SOUTHERN COMPANY, Southern Company Services, Inc., Georgia Power Company, and Arthur Andersen & Co., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1992-04-10
Citations: 958 F.2d 1514
Docket Number: Nos. 90-7088, 90-8452
Parties: M.R. TAFFET and Robert M. Fierman, on Behalf of Themselves and all of the Persons, Corporations, Municipalities, and other Entities, other than the Defendants, who are Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The SOUTHERN CO., Southern Company Services, Inc., Alabama Power Company and Arthur Andersen & Co., Defendants-Appellees. Frederick Rodgers CARR, Carr Sales Company, O.E.M. Products, Inc., Timothy Dunn Stokely, III and all Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The SOUTHERN COMPANY, Southern Company Services, Inc., Georgia Power Company, and Arthur Andersen & Co., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, COX, BIRCH and DUBINA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 958
Pages: 1514–1514

Head Matter:
M.R. TAFFET and Robert M. Fierman, on Behalf of Themselves and all of the Persons, Corporations, Municipalities, and other Entities, other than the Defendants, who are Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The SOUTHERN CO., Southern Company Services, Inc., Alabama Power Company and Arthur Andersen & Co., Defendants-Appellees. Frederick Rodgers CARR, Carr Sales Company, O.E.M. Products, Inc., Timothy Dunn Stokely, III and all Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The SOUTHERN COMPANY, Southern Company Services, Inc., Georgia Power Company, and Arthur Andersen & Co., Defendants-Appellees.
Nos. 90-7088, 90-8452.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
April 10, 1992.
Eddie Leitman, Andrew P. Campbell, S. Lynne Stephens, Leitman, Siegal, Payne & Campbell, P.C., Birmingham, Ala., Richard H. Gill, J. Fairley McDonald, III, Copeland, Franco, Screws & Gill, P.A., Montgomery, Ala., for plaintiffs-appellants.
John A. Boudet, Jerry R. Linscott, Baker & Hostetler, Orlando, Fla., for Taffett & Fierman.
Andrew M. Scherffius, Andrew M. Scherffius, P.C., A. Timothy Jones, Joseph C. Freeman, Jack N. Sibley, Freeman & Hawkins, Atlanta, Ga., for Taffet, et al.
Larry Moffett, Jackson Henderson Chiles, III, Daniel, Coker, Horton and Bell, P.A., Jackson, Miss., for M.R. Taffett, et al.
M. Roland Nachman, Jr., T.W. Thagard, Jr., Maury D. Smith, John P. Scott, Jr., Balch & Bingham, Montgomery, Ala., for Alabama Power.
James E. Joiner, Hugh M. Davenport, Troutman, Sanders, Lockerman & Ash-more, Atlanta, Ga., for Southern Co.
M. Robert Thornton, Michael C. Russ, King & Spaulding, Atlanta, Ga., for Arthur Andersen & Co.
Judges R. Lanier Anderson, III and J.L. Edmondson have recused themselves and will not participate.
Senior Judge Frank M. Johnson, Jr., who was a member of the original panel, has elected not to participate further in this matter. See 28 U.S.C. § 46(c).

Opinion:
PETITIONS FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC
Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, COX, BIRCH and DUBINA, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the applications for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the above causes shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.