Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Oscar Leonel CISNEROS-VALDEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-04-19
Citations: 8 F. App'x 710
Docket Number: No. 00-10315; D.C. No. CR-99-00447-JBR
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Oscar Leonel CISNEROS-VALDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 8
Pages: 710–711

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Oscar Leonel CISNEROS-VALDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 00-10315.
D.C. No. CR-99-00447-JBR.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 9, 2001.
Decided April 19, 2001.
Before CANBY, KOZINSKI, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Oscar Leonel Cisneros-Valdez appeals the 77-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to unlawful reentry of a deported alien. Cisneros-Valdez contends that in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), it is illegal to impose a sentence in excess of the two-year maximum set forth in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) based upon a prior felony not pled in the indictment. Cisneros-Valdez also contends that Apprendi renders inapplicable Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219,140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998) (holding that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a sentencing factor and not a separate offense), because Cisneros-Valdez did not admit to an aggravated felony at his plea hearing. These arguments are foreclosed by United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir. 2000), amended (Feb. 8, 2001) (order). United States v. Castillo-Rivera, 244 F.3d 1020,1024 (9th Cir.2001).
The sentence is AFFIRMED. This matter is REMANDED to the district court with directions to correct the judgment of conviction to exclude the reference to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b), consistent with United States v. Rivera-Sanchez, 222 F.3d 1057 (9th Cir.2000). United States v. Herrera-Bianco, 232 F.3d 715, 719 (2000).
AFFIRMED.
. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.