Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Damacio ANDRADE-CASTANEDA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-12-05
Citations: 256 F. App'x 731
Docket Number: No. 07-10237
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Damacio ANDRADE-CASTANEDA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 256
Pages: 731–731

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Damacio ANDRADE-CASTANEDA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-10237.
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 5, 2007.
Tamara Lynn Reno, U.S. Attorney’s Office Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Lars Robert Isaacson, Bennett, Weston & Lajone, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case following remand's for resentencing, Damacio Andrade-Castaneda raises arguments that are foreclosed by the law of the case doctrine. See United States v. Matthews, 312 F.3d 652, 657 (5th Cir.2002) (holding that under the law of the case doctrine, an issue of fact or law decided on appeal may not be reexamined by the appellate court on a subsequent appeal). The Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.