Case Name: Blondell SNIPES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1985-08-05
Citations: 473 So. 2d 773
Docket Number: No. 84-1975
Parties: Blondell SNIPES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HENDRY and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 473
Pages: 773–773

Head Matter:
Blondell SNIPES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 84-1975.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Aug. 5, 1985.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and DeMeo & Sherman, Thomas G. Sherman, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Joseph Lewis, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HENDRY and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Blondell Snipes appeals from an order of the trial court determining the dependency of her minor son. We reverse upon a. finding that the evidence was legally insufficient to support the dependency petition. Williams v. State, 437 So.2d 133 (Fla.1983), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 1690, 80 L.Ed.2d 164 (1984); Tibbs v. State, 397 So.2d 1120 (Fla.1981), aff'd, 457 U.S. 31, 102 S.Ct. 2211, 72 L.Ed.2d 652 (1982); Huggins v. State, 453 So.2d 835 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 456 So.2d 1182 (Fla.1984); Rodriguez v. State, 436 So.2d 219 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), rev. denied, 447 So.2d 888 (Fla.1984). Furthermore, the trial court erred in discharging appellant's court appointed attorney because it disagreed with his scheduling of certain depositions.
Reversed.