Case Name: Dee M. ROBY, Esq., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.; Carol Hickey; Debra Whalen; Pat Newton; Does 1-50, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-02-20
Citations: 267 F. App'x 618
Docket Number: No. 06-15703
Parties: Dee M. ROBY, Esq., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.; Carol Hickey; Debra Whalen; Pat Newton; Does 1-50, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: D.W. NELSON, KLEINFELD, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 267
Pages: 618–618

Head Matter:
Dee M. ROBY, Esq., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.; Carol Hickey; Debra Whalen; Pat Newton; Does 1-50, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 06-15703.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 13, 2008.
Filed Feb. 20, 2008.
F. Anthony Edwards, Esq., Seibel Finta & Edwards, Walnut Creek, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Sheila Marie Kiernan, Esq., Nixon Peabody LLP, Paula Champagne, Esq., Littler Mendelson, PC, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: D.W. NELSON, KLEINFELD, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Dee M. Roby ("Roby") appeals from the district court's grant of summary judgment to American Airlines, Inc. Pointing to no district court error in her opening brief, she attempts to raise an entirely new claim for the first time on appeal. We do not generally entertain arguments not raised before the district court, Doi v. Halekulani Corp., 276 F.3d 1131, 1140 (9th Cir.2002), and Roby's claim does not fit within any of the exceptional reasons for deviating from this rule, Bolker v. C.I.R., 760 F.2d 1039, 1042 (9th Cir.1985).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.