Case Name: FARENWALD ENTERPRISES, Appellant, v. Richard G. PECK and Valerie A. Peck, his wife, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1976-05-12
Citations: 332 So. 2d 59
Docket Number: No. BB-332
Parties: FARENWALD ENTERPRISES, Appellant, v. Richard G. PECK and Valerie A. Peck, his wife, Appellees.
Judges: BOYER, C. J., and McCORD and MILLS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 332
Pages: 59–60

Head Matter:
FARENWALD ENTERPRISES, Appellant, v. Richard G. PECK and Valerie A. Peck, his wife, Appellees.
No. BB-332.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
May 12, 1976.
Edna L. Caruso of Howell, Kirby, Montgomery, D’Aiuto & Dean, West Palm Beach, James M. McLean, Philip A. Webb, III, of Webb, Swain & Watson, Jacksonville, for appellant.
J. Richard Moore of Corrigan, Werber & Moore, Jacksonville, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Having considered the record, briefs and oral arguments of counsel, and finding that the interlocutory appeal is without substantial merit, it is dismissed pursuant to Rule 4.2c, Florida Appellate Rules. See AB CTC v. Morejon, Fla., 324 So.2d 625 (1976).
BOYER, C. J., and McCORD and MILLS, JJ., concur.