Case Name: Jada R. BRADY, Appellant, v. CENTAUR BUILDING SERVICES, INC. and Division of Employment Security, Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2016-02-09
Citations: 482 S.W.3d 450
Docket Number: No. ED 102859
Parties: Jada R. BRADY, Appellant, v. CENTAUR BUILDING SERVICES, INC. and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.
Judges: Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 482
Pages: 450–450

Head Matter:
Jada R. BRADY, Appellant, v. CENTAUR BUILDING SERVICES, INC. and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.
No. ED 102859
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Filed: February 9, 2016
John J. Ammann, St. Louis University Legal Clinic, 100 N. Tucker Blvd, Ste. 704, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.
Andrew C. Hooper, P.O. Box 59, Jefferson City, MO 65104, Centaur Building Services, Inc., Pro Se, 4401 Ridgewood Ave., St. Louis, MO 63112, for respondents.
Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
The claimant, Jada Brady, appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission disqualifying her from receiving unemployment-compensation benefits because the employer, Centaur Building Services, Inc., discharged the claimant for misconduct connected with her work. Finding no error, we affirm.
An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.
We affirm the decision of the Commission. Rule 84.16(b).