Case Name: Sandra Marie JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. McNAIRY & ASSOCIATES; Jim and Jeanne LLC; Jim McNairy; Jeanne McNairy, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-11-26
Citations: 489 F. App'x 731
Docket Number: No. 12-1861
Parties: Sandra Marie JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. McNAIRY & ASSOCIATES; Jim and Jeanne LLC; Jim McNairy; Jeanne McNairy, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 489
Pages: 731–732

Head Matter:
Sandra Marie JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. McNAIRY & ASSOCIATES; Jim and Jeanne LLC; Jim McNairy; Jeanne McNairy, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 12-1861.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 20, 2012.
Decided: Nov. 26, 2012.
Sandra Marie Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Denis E. Jacobson, Martha Richardson Sacrinty, Tuggle, Duggins & Meschan, PA, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Ap-pellees.
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Sandra Marie Johnson seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing her civil action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.
Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court's final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). "[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement." Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007).
The district court's order was entered on the docket on June 6, 2012. The notice of appeal was filed on July 13, 2012. Because Johnson failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.