Case Name: Timothy CLARKE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Virginia HAWORTH, sued in her individual and official capacities, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-11-07
Citations: 50 F. App'x 378
Docket Number: No. 01-56031; D.C. No. CV-97-00574-MRP/AJW
Parties: Timothy CLARKE, Plaintiff— Appellant, v. Virginia HAWORTH, sued in her individual and official capacities, Defendant — Appellee.
Judges: Before BALDOCK, KLEINFELD and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 50
Pages: 378–378

Head Matter:
Timothy CLARKE, Plaintiff— Appellant, v. Virginia HAWORTH, sued in her individual and official capacities, Defendant — Appellee.
No. 01-56031.
D.C. No. CV-97-00574-MRP/AJW.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Oct. 9, 2002.
Decided Nov. 7, 2002.
Before BALDOCK, KLEINFELD and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
The Honorable Bobby R. Baldock, Senior Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
The district court properly granted Appellee Virginia Haworth's ("Haworth") motion for summary judgment. Appellant Timothy Clarke ("Clarke") admitted that Haworth's alleged comment that Clarke was an informant was not the actual cause of the assaults against him. Since Clarke failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact that Haworth's alleged deliberate indifference was the actual and proximate cause of his injuries, summary judgment was appropriate. See Leer v. Murphy, 844 F.2d 628, 634 (9th Cir.1988).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.