Case Name: Dale E. FINDLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VOLVO POWERTRAIN NORTH AMERICA; Volvo Trucks North America; Volvo Group North America; Mack Trucks, Incorporated, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-05-31
Citations: 433 F. App'x 195
Docket Number: No. 10-1782
Parties: Dale E. FINDLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VOLVO POWERTRAIN NORTH AMERICA; Volvo Trucks North America; Volvo Group North America; Mack Trucks, Incorporated, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 433
Pages: 195–195

Head Matter:
Dale E. FINDLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VOLVO POWERTRAIN NORTH AMERICA; Volvo Trucks North America; Volvo Group North America; Mack Trucks, Incorporated, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 10-1782.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 11, 2011.
Decided: May 31, 2011.
Steven M. Spiegel, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Suzzanne W. Decker, John M. Gilman, Miles & Stockbridge, P.C., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Dale E. Findley appeals the district court's orders granting summary judgment and awarding costs in favor of his former employer, Mack Trucks. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Findley v. Volvo Powertrain N. Am., No. 1:08-cv03509-JFM, 2010 WL 1418024 (D. Md. Apr. 6, 2010) & (July 1, 2010). We grant Findley's motion to supplement the record pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 28(j). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.