Case Name: MORE COMPANY, INC., Appellant, v. SUNRISE AIR, INC., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-01-26
Citations: 757 So. 2d 517
Docket Number: No. 3D98-2496
Parties: MORE COMPANY, INC., Appellant, v. SUNRISE AIR, INC., Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and JORGENSON and FLETCHER, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 757
Pages: 517–517

Head Matter:
MORE COMPANY, INC., Appellant, v. SUNRISE AIR, INC., Appellee.
No. 3D98-2496.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan. 26, 2000.
Rehearing Denied May 24, 2000.
Marlow, Connell, Valerius, Abrams, Adler & Newman and William G. Edwards, Miami, for appellant.
Steel Hector & Davis and Lawrence P. Bemis, Alvin F. Lindsay, III, and Robert W. Pittman, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and JORGENSON and FLETCHER, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Because ' Sunrise Air, Inc. filed suit against MORE Company, Inc. alleging breach of contract, the contract's forum selectibn provision applies. The forum selection clause provides that any claims be brought in Nevada; therefore, Florida is not the proper forum for this suit. See Amedex Int'l Corp. v. Marino, 722 So.2d 836, 838 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (holding that claims against a foreign insurer "were properly dismissed under the policies' forum selection clauses"). We reverse and direct the trial court to dismiss this action.
REVERSED and REMANDED.