Case Name: Joseph B. LAMBERT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MECKLENBURG COUNTY; Dena Diorio; Chris Peek, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-11-21
Citations: 670 F. App'x 780
Docket Number: No. 16-1755
Parties: Joseph B. LAMBERT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MECKLENBURG COUNTY; Dena Diorio; Chris Peek, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 670
Pages: 780–780

Head Matter:
Joseph B. LAMBERT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MECKLENBURG COUNTY; Dena Diorio; Chris Peek, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-1755
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: November 17, 2016
Decided: November 21, 2016
Joseph B. Lambert, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Rainey, Womble Carlyle San-dridge & Rice, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Joseph B. Lambert appeals the district court's order granting the Defendants' motion to dismiss and denying Lambert's motion to amend his complaint as futile. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lambert v. Mecklenburg Cty., No. 3:15—cv-00577-GCM, 2016 WL 3176593 (W.D.N.C. June 2, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED