Case Name: JOHN HOEY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, AND ZADOCK H. JARMAN, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1878-06
Citations: 40 N.J.L. 379
Docket Number: 
Parties: JOHN HOEY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, AND ZADOCK H. JARMAN, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 40
Pages: 379–379

Head Matter:
JOHN HOEY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, AND ZADOCK H. JARMAN, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
In error to the Supreme Court.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given by that court. 10 Vroom 523.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Dixon, Eeed,Woodhull, Clement, Dodd, Green, Lilly, Wales. 9.
Far reversal—None.