Case Name: Anthony Gallo, Plaintiff, v. Facilities Development Corporation et al., Defendants; Facilities Development Corporation et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. G-A Masonry, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1999-03-31
Citations: 259 A.D.2d 1044
Docket Number: Appeal No. 1
Parties: Anthony Gallo, Plaintiff, v Facilities Development Corporation et al., Defendants. Facilities Development Corporation et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, v G-A Masonry, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 259
Pages: 1044–1044

Head Matter:
Anthony Gallo, Plaintiff, v Facilities Development Corporation et al., Defendants. Facilities Development Corporation et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, v G-A Masonry, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
(Appeal No. 1.)
[689 NYS2d 902]

Opinion:
Appeal by third-party plaintiffs Pike/McCarthy, The Pike Company, Inc., and McCarthy Brothers Company unanimously dismissed upon stipulation and order affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Third-party plaintiff The Facilities Development Corporation did not raise the issue of its entitlement to counsel fees and disbursements in its brief. That issue is therefore deemed abandoned (see, Ciesinski v Town of Aurora, 202 AD2d 984). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Lunn, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Hayes and Hurlbutt, JJ.