Case Name: Muhammad Jalal Deen AKBAR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doctor WALASIN, Defendant-Appellee, and Bureau of Prisons; Doctor Tim; Sally Johnson; Kathy Hawk-Sawyer, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-02-22
Citations: 3 F. App'x 173
Docket Number: No. 00-7384
Parties: Muhammad Jalal Deen AKBAR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doctor WALASIN, Defendant-Appellee, and Bureau of Prisons; Doctor Tim; Sally Johnson; Kathy Hawk-Sawyer, Defendants.
Judges: Before WILKINS, DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 3
Pages: 173–174

Head Matter:
Muhammad Jalal Deen AKBAR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doctor WALASIN, Defendant-Appellee, and Bureau of Prisons; Doctor Tim; Sally Johnson; Kathy Hawk-Sawyer, Defendants.
No. 00-7384.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 8, 2001.
Decided Feb. 22, 2001.
Muhammad Jalal Deen Akbar, pro se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, NC, for appellee.
Before WILKINS, DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Muhammad Jalal Deen Akbar appeals from the district court's order dismissing his Bivens action. Our review of the record discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order on the reasoning of the district court. Akbar v. Bureau of Prisons, No. CA-99-526-5-H (E.D.N.C. Sept. 13, 2000). We deny Akbar's pending motions to stay, for general relief, and, because this appeal presents no complex issues, we also deny his motion for counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
See Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971).