Case Name: GIANT TIGER CORPORATION ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF TRENTON, RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1934-05-04
Citations: 113 N.J.L. 34
Docket Number: 
Parties: GIANT TIGER CORPORATION ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF TRENTON, RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 113
Pages: 34–34

Head Matter:
GIANT TIGER CORPORATION ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF TRENTON, RESPONDENT.
Submitted February 16, 1934
— Decided May 4, 1934.
For the appellants, Alexander Budson and Henry Hartman.
For the respondents, Charles B. Bird and Romulus P. Rimo.

Opinion:
Pee Cueiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Teenchaed, Paekee, Lloyd, Hehee, Van Buskiek, Kays, Heteield, Wells, Dill, JJ. 10.
For reversal — The Chief Justice, Peeskie, Deae, JJ. 3.