Case Name: AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF KENTUCKY; Bart McQueary, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MERCER COUNTY, Kentucky; Charles H. McGinnis, in his official capacity as Mercer County Judge Executive, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-04-24
Citations: 446 F.3d 651
Docket Number: No. 03-5142
Parties: AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF KENTUCKY; Bart McQueary, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MERCER COUNTY, Kentucky; Charles H. McGinnis, in his official capacity as Mercer County Judge Executive, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: SUHRHEINRICH and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges; RICE, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 446
Pages: 651–655

Head Matter:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF KENTUCKY; Bart McQueary, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MERCER COUNTY, Kentucky; Charles H. McGinnis, in his official capacity as Mercer County Judge Executive, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 03-5142.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
April 24, 2006.
David A. Friedman, American Civil Liberties Union of Kentucky General Counsel, Lousiville, KY, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
Francis J. Manion, New Hope, KY, Mathew D. Staver, Erik W. Stanley, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: SUHRHEINRICH and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges; RICE, District Judge.
The Honorable Walter H. Rice, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
ORDER
This matter comes before the court upon the petition for rehearing en banc, filed by counsel for the appellants, and the response of the appellees thereto. The petition has been circulated not only to the original panel members but also to all other judges of the court in regular active service, less than a majority of whom have voted in favor of rehearing en banc. Accordingly, the petition has been returned to the panel for decision.
Upon consideration of the petition and the response, the panel concludes that the issues raised therein were fully considered upon the original submission and decision of the case, and the request for rehearing is therefore denied.