Case Name: Paul GUZZARDO, Appellant, v. VANDEVENTER SPRING REDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION and Washington University, Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2016-10-25
Citations: 507 S.W.3d 598
Docket Number: ED 104288
Parties: Paul GUZZARDO, Appellant, v. VANDEVENTER SPRING REDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION and Washington University, Respondents.
Judges: Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 507
Pages: 598–598

Head Matter:
Paul GUZZARDO, Appellant, v. VANDEVENTER SPRING REDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION and Washington University, Respondents.
ED 104288
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Filed: October 25, 2016
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied December 1, 2016
Application for Transfer Denied January 31, 2017
Paul Guzzardo, Macomb, IL, Appellant Acting Pro se,
Sandra J. Wunderlich, Cicely I. Lubben, Stinson Leonard Street LLP, St. Louis, MO, for respondent Vandeventer Sp. Re-dev.
Douglas W. ¡King, Shands, Elbert, Gia-noulakis & Giljum, LLP, St. Louis, MO, for respondent Washington University.
Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Paul Guzzardo appeals from a grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants Vandeventer Spring Redevelopment Corporation and Washington University St. Louis. We affirm.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).