Case Name: JOHN TRICOLO, RESPONDENT, v. DONATO CENTALANZA, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1925-05-18
Citations: 101 N.J.L. 569
Docket Number: 
Parties: JOHN TRICOLO, RESPONDENT, v. DONATO CENTALANZA, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 101
Pages: 569–570

Head Matter:
JOHN TRICOLO, RESPONDENT, v. DONATO CENTALANZA, APPELLANT.
Argued March 20, 1925
Decided May 18, 1925.
For the appellant, Thomas Brunetto.
For the respondent, Gaetano M. Belfatto.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion per curiam delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.