Case Name: NELSON CRESPO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. JOSEF STAPF, JOSEF STAPF MASCHINENBEAU, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND SCHACHNE FEATHER COMPANY, HUDSON FEATHER COMPANY, HUDSON FEATHER AND DOWN PRODUCTS, INC., PURO DOWN INTERNATIONAL OF NEW JERSEY CORP., PURO INTERNATIONAL OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS. JACK S. PIERMONT AND LERNER AND PIERMONT, ESQS., INTERVENORS-APPELLANTS
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1991-05-23
Citations: 248 N.J. Super. 349
Docket Number: 
Parties: NELSON CRESPO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. JOSEF STAPF, JOSEF STAPF MASCHINENBEAU, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND SCHACHNE FEATHER COMPANY, HUDSON FEATHER COMPANY, HUDSON FEATHER AND DOWN PRODUCTS, INC., PURO DOWN INTERNATIONAL OF NEW JERSEY CORP., PURO INTERNATIONAL OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS. JACK S. PIERMONT AND LERNER AND PIERMONT, ESQS., INTERVENORS-APPELLANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 248
Pages: 349–350

Head Matter:
591 A.2d 277
NELSON CRESPO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. JOSEF STAPF, JOSEF STAPF MASCHINENBEAU, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND SCHACHNE FEATHER COMPANY, HUDSON FEATHER COMPANY, HUDSON FEATHER AND DOWN PRODUCTS, INC., PURO DOWN INTERNATIONAL OF NEW JERSEY CORP., PURO INTERNATIONAL OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS. JACK S. PIERMONT AND LERNER AND PIERMONT, ESQS., INTERVENORS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued May 7, 1991
Decided May 23, 1991.
Before Judges MICHELS, BRODY and GRUCCIO.
John C. Kennedy argued the cause for intervenors-appellants Jack S. Piermont and Lerner and Piermont, Esqs, (O’Donnell, Kennedy, Vespole & Piechta, attorneys; John C. Kennedy, of counsel and on the brief).
George J. Kenny argued the cause for defendants-respondents Josef Stapf and Josef Stapf Maschinenbeau (Connell, Foley & Geiser, attorneys; George J. Kenny, of counsel; George J. Kenny and Angela A. luso, on the brief).
No appearance was made on behalf of plaintiff-appellant Nelson Crespo.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the summary judgment of the Law Division entered in favor of defendants Josef Stapf and Josef Stapf Maschinenbeau dismissing the complaint of plaintiff Nelson Crespo in this product liability action substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Wefing in her written opinion which is reported as Crespo v. Stapf, 242 N.J.Super. 254, 576 A.2d 346 (Law Div.1990). We are satisfied from our study of the record and the arguments presented that the trial court properly granted summary judgment in favor of defendants and that all of the issues of law raised are clearly without merit. R. 2:11-3(e)(l)(E). See also Juzwin v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd., 900 F.2d 686 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 246, 112 L.Ed.2d 204 (1990).
Affirmed.