Case Name: JEFF MONTGOMERY v. STATE
Court: Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1918-02-13
Citations: 14 Okla. Crim. 298
Docket Number: No. A-2845
Parties: JEFF MONTGOMERY v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: Oklahoma Criminal Reports
Volume: 14
Pages: 298–298

Head Matter:
JEFF MONTGOMERY v. STATE.
No. A-2845.
Opinion Filed February 13, 1918.
(170 Pac. 519.)
APPEAL AND ERROR — Failure to File Brief — Affirmance. Where plaintiff in error filed no brief and made no oral argument, the judgment, on motion of Attorney General, will toe affirmed, where an examination of the record discloses that the appeal is without merit.
Appeal from County Court, Otta/wa County; Vem E. Thompson, Judge.
Jeff Montgomery was convicted of a violation of the prohibitory law, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
Smith' & McGhee, for plaintiff in error.
R. McMillan, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The plaintiff in error, Jeff Montgomery, and Kinnie Barnett, were jointly charged with the unlawful possession of 24 pints of Budweiser beer, with the intent of violating provisions of the prohibitory laws. Upon their trial the jury returned a verdict, finding the defendant Barnett not guilty, and finding the defendant Jeff Montgomery ' guilty, and fixing his punishment at 30 days' imprisonment and a fine of $50. From the judgment rendered on the verdict the defendant Montgomery appeals. No brief has been filed nor oral argument made. For this reason the Attorney General has filed a motion to affirm the judgment.
An examination of the record discloses that the appeal is without merit. The judgment is therefore affirmed. Mandate forthwith.