Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Eugene MOTT, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-07-01
Citations: 328 F. App'x 170
Docket Number: No. 09-6432
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Eugene MOTT, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 328
Pages: 170–170

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Eugene MOTT, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-6432.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 22, 2009.
Decided: July 1, 2009.
Robert Eugene Mott, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Robert Eugene Mott appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Mott, No. 5:00-cr-00046-RLV-3 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 4, 2009). See United States v. Hood, 556 F.3d 226 (4th Cir.2009). We deny Mott's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.