Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeffrey Ronald BANKER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-09-16
Citations: 143 F. App'x 860
Docket Number: No. 03-30588
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jeffrey Ronald BANKER, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: REINHARDT, RYMER, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 143
Pages: 860–861

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jeffrey Ronald BANKER, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 03-30588.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 12, 2005.
Decided Sept. 16, 2005.
Jeffrey A. Kent, Esq., Eugene, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Bryan E. Lessley, Esq., Office of the Federal Public Defender, Eugene, OR, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: REINHARDT, RYMER, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Jeffrey Ronald Banker appeals the 140-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
Because Banker was sentenced under the then-mandatory Sentencing Guidelines, and we cannot reliably determine from the record whether the sentence imposed would have been materially different had the district court known that the Guidelines were advisory, we remand to the sentencing court to answer that question, and to proceed pursuant to United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez, 419 F.3d 906, 915 (9th Cir.2005).
REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.