Case Name: Charla CONN and Dustin Conn, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF RENO; Ryan Ashton; David Robertson, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-09-06
Citations: 658 F.3d 897
Docket Number: No. 07-15572
Parties: Charla CONN and Dustin Conn, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF RENO; Ryan Ashton; David Robertson, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: MARY M. SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON, and STEPHEN REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 658
Pages: 897–897

Head Matter:
Charla CONN and Dustin Conn, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF RENO; Ryan Ashton; David Robertson, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 07-15572.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Sept. 6, 2011.
Terri Keyser-Cooper, Law Office of Terry Keyser-Cooper, Reno, NV, Diane K. Vaillancourt, Esquire, Santa Cruz, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
Jack D. Campbell, Counsel, Office Of The City Attorney, Donald L. Christensen, Counsel, Reno City Attorney’s Office, Patricia A. Lynch, Esquire, Reno, NV, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: MARY M. SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON, and STEPHEN REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
We reinstate the opinion at 591 F.3d 1081 (9th Cir.2010), except that in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Connick v. Thompson, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 1350, 179 L.Ed.2d 417 (2011), we affirm in all respects the district court's grant of summary judgment as to municipality liability. Parts 111(C)(1) and 111(C)(2) of the opinion will remain vacated. Therefore, we order that the district court's decision is AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.