Case Name: WILLIAMSON, Appellant v. HERSETH, Respondent
Court: South Dakota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: South Dakota
Decision Date: 1960-08-18
Citations: 78 S.D. 476
Docket Number: File No. 972
Parties: WILLIAMSON, Appellant v. HERSETH, Respondent
Judges: All the Judges concur.
Reporter: South Dakota Reports
Volume: 78
Pages: 476–477

Head Matter:
WILLIAMSON, Appellant v. HERSETH, Respondent
(104 N.W.2d 473)
(File No. 972
Opinion filed August 18, 1960)
Stephens, Riter & Mayer, Pierre, for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Parnell J. Donohue, Atty. Gen., Pat Morrison, Moferidge, for Defendant and Respondent.

Opinion:
DANDY, Circuit Judge.
Charges made against Alan Williamson as Unemployment Compensation Commissioner were heard before the Governor pursuant to SDC 1960 Supp. 17.0803-3. Following such -hearing, but before any official action had been taken by the Governor, Williamson obtained an Alternative Writ of Prohibition from the Circuit Court of the Sixth Judicial Circuit, in Hughes County. By such writ the Governor was restrained from proceeding further with the removal of Williamson from office. On the return day the Trial Court, on the authority of In re Petition of Mee, 45 S.D. 303, 187 N.W. 540, declared itself to be without power to stay proceedings pending appeal and entered an order quashing and dismissing such writ. This appeal is from such order. No application was made to this Court for the preservation of the status quo. Thereafter the Governor formally removed Williamson from office and appointed bis successor, who has duly qualified. Additionally, the term of -office for which Williamson was appointed expired during the pendency of this appeal.
What was written by the Supreme Court of the United States in Jones v. Montague, 194 U.S. 147, 24 S.Ct. 611, 612, 48 L.Ed. 913, is explanatory of the action which must be taken here:
"The case before us is one in prohibition. the thing sought to be prohibited -has been done, and cannot be undone by any order of court. any adjudication which this court might make would be only an ineffectual decision of the question whether or not these petitioners were wronged by what has been ful-ly accomplished. Under those circumstances there is nothing but a moot case remaining, and the motion to dismiss must be sustained."
The motion herein to dismiss the appeal is granted.
All the Judges concur.
BANDY, Circuit Judge, sitting for SMITH, J., disqualified.