Case Name: SHERWOOD, Respondent, v. CRANE, Appellant
Court: New York City Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1894-06-20
Citations: 29 N.Y.S. 1149
Docket Number: 
Parties: SHERWOOD, Respondent, v. CRANE, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 29
Pages: 1149–1149

Head Matter:
SHERWOOD, Respondent, v. CRANE, Appellant.
(City Court of New York, General Term.
June 20, 1894.)
Action by Grace Sherwood against William H. Crane. Rose & Putzel, for appellant. Howe & Hummel, for respondent.

Opinion:
FITZSIMONS, J.
Was plaintiff's engagement for-the run of the play only, or was it for the season, which plaintiff says that defendant's representative stated to her to be for the term from January 30th to the following June 1st? That is a question of fact, and was properly submitted by the trial justice to the jury. Their finding in plaintiff's favor upon that question is conclusive, and has ample evidence to sustain it. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment, with costs.