Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clarence EASTER, a/k/a CJ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-04-07
Citations: 373 F. App'x 344
Docket Number: No. 08-8371
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clarence EASTER, a/k/a CJ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 373
Pages: 344–344

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clarence EASTER, a/k/a CJ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-8371.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 25, 2010.
Decided: April 7, 2010.
Clarence Easter, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Sinclair Duffey, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Clarence Easter appeals the district court's order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence and asserts that he should have received the specific reduction he sought. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 1B1.10, p.s. ("The authorization of such a discretionary reduction . does not entitle a defendant to a reduced term of imprisonment as a matter of right."); see also United States v. Stewart, 595 F.3d 197, 204 (4th Cir.2010) (declining to determine that defendant was automatically entitled to a specific sentence reduction and noting that discretion to evaluate the policy and circumstances is vested in the district court). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.