Case Name: Robert PAIGE-EL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Theodis BECK; G.J. Hayes; Pamela Alston; Barry J. Anderson, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-02-12
Citations: 86 F. App'x 673
Docket Number: No. 03-6680
Parties: Robert PAIGE-EL, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Theodis BECK; G.J. Hayes; Pamela Alston; Barry J. Anderson, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 86
Pages: 673–674

Head Matter:
Robert PAIGE-EL, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Theodis BECK; G.J. Hayes; Pamela Alston; Barry J. Anderson, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 03-6680.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 5, 2003.
Decided Feb. 12, 2004.
Robert Paige-El, Appellant pro se.
Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Robert Paige-El, a North Carolina inmate, filed a complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000), alleging prison officials searched his locker and discarded his legal books and papers and his religious books. Paige-El appeals from the district court's order dismissing his § 1983 action as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)® (2000). While we affirm on the reasoning of the district court, see Paige-El v. Beck, No. CA-03-38-5-H (E.D.N.C. March 25, 2003), we modify the district court's order to reflect that the dismissal is without prejudice. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED