Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Luis GARIBAY-GARIBAY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-08-15
Citations: 141 F. App'x 664
Docket Number: No. 04-30504
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jose Luis GARIBAY-GARIBAY, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 141
Pages: 664–665

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jose Luis GARIBAY-GARIBAY, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 04-30504.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 1, 2005.
Decided Aug. 15, 2005.
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CALLAHAN, and BEA, Circuit Judge.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Jose Luis Garibay-Garibay appeals his sentence imposed following his guilty plea to re-entry of a deported alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Garibay-Garibay was sentenced before the United States Supreme Court held in United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 764, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), that the Sentencing Guidelines were effectively advisory. He contends that his case should be remanded for resentencing under the advisory Guidelines. The record does not show how the district court would have proceeded had it known that the Guidelines were not mandatory. Accordingly, we remand for the district court to answer the question whether the sentence would have been materially different if it had known that the Guidelines were advisory, and for further proceedings under United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez, No. 03-30387, slip op. 7773, 7793-94, 2005 WL 1560269 (9th Cir. July 5, 2005) (amended opinion).
REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.