Case Name: In the Matter of Shirley X. Saenz, Appellant, v. Forrest Richardson, Respondent. (Proceeding No. 1.); In the Matter of Forrest Richardson, Respondent, v. Shirley X. Saenz, Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.)
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2013-07-03
Citations: 108 A.D.3d 564
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Shirley X. Saenz, Appellant, v Forrest Richardson, Respondent. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Forrest Richardson, Respondent, v Shirley X. Saenz, Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.)
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 108
Pages: 564–565

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Shirley X. Saenz, Appellant, v Forrest Richardson, Respondent. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Forrest Richardson, Respondent, v Shirley X. Saenz, Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.)
[967 NYS2d 839]

Opinion:
In related child support proceedings, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Weinstein, J.), dated November 16, 2011, which denied her objections to so much of an order of the same court (Milsap, S.M.), dated September 7, 2011, as amended September 28, 2011, as, after a hearing, granted the father's petition to the extent of directing her to pay child support in the sum of $153 biweekly, plus retroactive support in the sum of $4,568 for the period from July 19, 2010, until September 9, 2011, plus 44% of unreimbursed health care expenses.
Ordered that the order dated November 16, 2011, is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the mother's contention, the Support Magistrate properly imputed income to her in granting the father's petition to the extent of directing her to pay child support in the sum of $153 biweekly, plus retroactive support in the sum of $4,568 for the period from July 19, 2010, until September 9, 2011, plus 44% of unreimbursed health care expenses (see Matter of Mongelluzzo v Sondgeroth, 95 AD3d 1332, 1333 [2012]; Chamberlain v Chamberlain, 24 AD3d 589, 594 [2005]; Thoma v Thoma, 21 AD3d 1080, 1081 [2005]).
The mother's remaining contentions are either without merit or not properly before this Court. Dillon, J.P., Roman, Miller and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.