Case Name: Marc Bernard ROSE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Mel HUNTER, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-08-17
Citations: 107 F. App'x 83
Docket Number: No. 03-15069
Parties: Marc Bernard ROSE, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Mel HUNTER, Respondent—Appellee.
Judges: Before: GOODWIN, CANBY, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 107
Pages: 83–83

Head Matter:
Marc Bernard ROSE, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Mel HUNTER, Respondent—Appellee.
No. 03-15069.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted June 16, 2004.
Decided Aug. 17, 2004.
Erik G. Babcock, Esq., Attorney at Law, Oakland, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.
Marc Bernard Rose, Atascadero, CA, pro se.
Christopher J. Wei, DAG, Office of the California Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.
Before: GOODWIN, CANBY, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
For the reasons set forth in Hubbart v. Knapp, 379 F.3d 773 (9th Cir.2004), Appellant's claims for habeas corpus relief are not moot. The district court's dismissal of Appellant's petition is
REVERSED and REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.