Case Name: CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ENTERGY NUCLEAR INDIAN POINT 2, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. United States, Defendant-Appellee; Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, LLC, Plaintiff-Cross Appellant, v. United States, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-03-28
Citations: 454 F. App'x 897
Docket Number: Nos. 2010-5154, 2010-5155, 2010-5157
Parties: CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ENTERGY NUCLEAR INDIAN POINT 2, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. United States, Defendant-Appellee. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, LLC, Plaintiff-Cross Appellant, v. United States, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Claims Reporter
Volume: 103
Pages: 897–897

Head Matter:
CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ENTERGY NUCLEAR INDIAN POINT 2, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. United States, Defendant-Appellee. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, LLC, Plaintiff-Cross Appellant, v. United States, Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 2010-5154, 2010-5155, 2010-5157.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
March 28, 2011.
Elaine J. Goldenberg, David A. Churchill, Jenner & Block LLP, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Alexander D. Tomaszezuk, Evan David Wesser, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, McLean, VA, Jay Eliott Silberg, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, Washington, DC, Layton Jager Smith, Jr., Wise, Carter, Child & Caraway, P.A., Jackson, MS, for Plaintiff-Appellee/Plain-tiff-Cross Appellant.
Andrew P. Averbach, Harold D. Lester, Jr., Alan J. Lo Re, Jane K. Taylor, Patrick B. Bryan, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee/De-fendant-Appellant.

Opinion:
ON MOTION
ORDER
Upon consideration of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.'s motion to voluntarily dismiss its appeal,
It Is Ordered That:
(1) The motion is granted. 2010-5154 is dismissed.
(2) Each side shall bear its own costs as to 2010-5154.
(3) The revised official caption as to 2010-5155, -5157 is reflected above.
(4) The United States' opening brief is due within 60 days of the date of filing of this order.