Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose VARGAS-CISNEROS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-07-19
Citations: 235 F. App'x 447
Docket Number: No. 06-10612
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose VARGAS-CISNEROS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: LEAVY, THOMAS, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 235
Pages: 447–447

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose VARGAS-CISNEROS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-10612.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 9, 2007 .
Filed July 19, 2007.
Paul L. Pugliese, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Reno, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Charles C. Diaz, Esq., Law Offices of Charles C. Diaz, Reno, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: LEAVY, THOMAS, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Jose Vargas-Cisneros appeals from his 135-month sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine and aiding and abetting, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, 841(a)(1), 841(b)(l)(A)(viii), and 18 U.S.C. § 2.
We reject Vargas-Cisneros's contention regarding the enforceability of the appeal waiver, and we dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Cardenas, 405 F.3d 1046, 1048 (9th Cir.2005); see also United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084 n. 8 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.