Case Name: Martha A. WILLIAMS, Respondent, v. Mark S. WILLIAMS Sr., Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2016-10-11
Citations: 500 S.W.3d 909
Docket Number: No. ED 103278
Parties: Martha A. WILLIAMS, Respondent, v. Mark S. WILLIAMS Sr., Appellant.
Judges: Before Angela T. Quigless, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 500
Pages: 909–909

Head Matter:
Martha A. WILLIAMS, Respondent, v. Mark S. WILLIAMS Sr., Appellant.
No. ED 103278
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Filed: October 11, 2016
Jeffrey A. Heater, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
N. Kimasa Sindel, Clayton, MO, for respondent.
Before Angela T. Quigless, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Mark S. Williams, Sr. ("Father") appeals from the trial court's judgment in favor of Martha A. Williams, extending Father's child support obligation past the eighteenth birthday of Mark S. Williams, Jr. ("Son"). Pursuant to section 452.340.4, RSMo. 2000, the trial court held Son was not emancipated because he is unmarried, insolvent, and mentally incapacitated from supporting himself for the foreseeable future. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find the trial court did not clearly err in its judgment. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2015).
. All further statutory references are to RSMo 2000 as supplemented, unless otherwise indicated.