Case Name: Samuel MILSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-12-18
Citations: 832 So. 2d 897
Docket Number: No. 3D01-3070
Parties: Samuel MILSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before JORGENSON, FLETCHER, and RAMIREZ, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 832
Pages: 897–897

Head Matter:
Samuel MILSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D01-3070.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 18, 2002.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Harvey J. Sepler, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Richard E. Doran, Attorney General, and Michael J. Neimand Assistant Attorney General, and Alison F. Smith, Certified Legal Intern, for appellee.
Before JORGENSON, FLETCHER, and RAMIREZ, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence for two counts of second degree murder with a firearm. We affirm.
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing the State to use a "power point" presentation in closing argument to illustrate a verdict form. See Brown v. State, 550 So.2d 527, 528 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989) (holding that "[t]he determination as to whether to allow the use of a demonstrative exhibit is a matter within the trial court's discretion" so long as the exhibit constitutes "an accurate and reasonable reproduction of the object involved.").
We find no merit in the remaining points on appeal, as the errors, if any, were harmless. See State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).
AFFIRMED.