Case Name: James PAIR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1974-06-14
Citations: 295 So. 2d 679
Docket Number: No. 73-343
Parties: James PAIR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: OWEN, C. J., and CROSS and MAGER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 295
Pages: 679–680

Head Matter:
James PAIR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 73-343.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
June 14, 1974.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Richard S. Power, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and C. Marie Bernard, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The order denying petitioner's motion to vacate judgment and sentence is affirmed on the ground that the allegations set forth in the motion are insufficient to show a right to relief under Rule 3.850, F.R.Cr.P., 33 F.S.A. The motion fails to contain any allegation that petitioner, who alleges that he was denied the benefit of counsel, was insolvent and unable to procure counsel at the time of his conviction in 1946. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed without prejudice to the re-filing of a motion containing the necessary allegations. McClen-don v. Wainwright, Fla.App. 1973, 280 So. 2d 703.
OWEN, C. J., and CROSS and MAGER, JJ., concur.