Case Name: David Earl JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Paul G. BUTLER, Jr.; Willis J. Fowler; Anthony E. Rand; Derrick Wadsworth, Defendants-Appellees, and Beverly Perdue; Patrick L. McCrory, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-06-14
Citations: 654 F. App'x 137
Docket Number: No. 16-6001
Parties: David Earl JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Paul G. BUTLER, Jr.; Willis J. Fowler; Anthony E. Rand; Derrick Wadsworth, Defendants-Appellees, and Beverly Perdue; Patrick L. McCrory, Defendants.
Judges: Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 654
Pages: 137–137

Head Matter:
David Earl JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Paul G. BUTLER, Jr.; Willis J. Fowler; Anthony E. Rand; Derrick Wadsworth, Defendants-Appellees, and Beverly Perdue; Patrick L. McCrory, Defendants.
No. 16-6001
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 25, 2016
Decided: June 14, 2016
David Earl Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Finarelli, Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Ap-pellees.
Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
David Earl Jones appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. Butler, No. 5:14-ct-03142-D (E.D.N.C. Dec. 15, 2015). We deny as unnecessary Jones' motion for a certificate of appealability. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.