Case Name: Vincent R. Kelly et al., on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Members of the Policemen's Benevolent Association of Westchester County, Inc., Similarly Situated, Respondents, v. Policemen's Benevolent Association of Westchester County, Inc., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1951-02-19
Citations: 278 A.D. 669
Docket Number: 
Parties: Vincent R. Kelly et al., on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Members of the Policemen’s Benevolent Association of Westchester County, Inc., Similarly Situated, Respondents, v. Policemen’s Benevolent Association of Westchester County, Inc., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 278
Pages: 669–669

Head Matter:
Vincent R. Kelly et al., on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Members of the Policemen’s Benevolent Association of Westchester County, Inc., Similarly Situated, Respondents, v. Policemen’s Benevolent Association of Westchester County, Inc., Appellant.

Opinion:
In an action to restrain expulsion of members of a membership corporation, the complaint alleges that certain provisions of the constitution and by-laws were repealed by the action of less than the two thirds of the executive body required by the constitution and by-laws, in that the appellant corporation for a long period recognized amendment by such method. Order denying appellant's cross motion, under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Paragraph ninth of the complaint contains an allegation that the constitution and by-laws were duly amended. (People ex rel. Crane v. Ryder, 12 N. Y. 433.) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.