Case Name: STATE, Appellee, v. Clay DUNLAP et al., Appellants; SAME v. A. S. STEWART, Appellant; SAME v. Claude WELLS, Appellant; SAME v. E. A. SHEDOUDY, Appellant; SAME v. Dominic CUNICO, Appellant; SAME v. Robert L. BLEDSOE, Appellant; SAME v. J. H. SINGER, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of New Mexico
Jurisdiction: New Mexico
Decision Date: 1925-12-14
Citations: 31 N.M. 275
Docket Number: No. 2968; No. 2969; No. 2979; No. 2983; No. 2993; No. 3040; No. 3041
Parties: STATE, Appellee, v. Clay DUNLAP et al., Appellants. SAME v. A. S. STEWART, Appellant. SAME v. Claude WELLS, Appellant. SAME v. E. A. SHEDOUDY, Appellant. SAME v. Dominic CUNICO, Appellant. SAME v. Robert L. BLEDSOE, Appellant. SAME v. J. H. SINGER, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Mexico Reports
Volume: 31
Pages: 275–276

Head Matter:
[242 Pac. 449.
Dec. 14, 1925.]
STATE, Appellee, v. Clay DUNLAP et al., Appellants. SAME v. A. S. STEWART, Appellant. SAME v. Claude WELLS, Appellant. SAME v. E. A. SHEDOUDY, Appellant. SAME v. Dominic CUNICO, Appellant. SAME v. Robert L. BLEDSOE, Appellant. SAME v. J. H. SINGER, Appellant.
(No. 2968.)
(No. 2969.)
(No. 2979.)
(No. 2983.)
(No. 2993.)
(No. 3040.)
(No. 3041.)
O. O. Askren, of Santa Fe, for appellant Dunlap.
Roy Prentice, of Tucnmcari, for appellant Stewart.
R. A. Ptentice, of Tncumcari, for appellant Wells.
Fred J. Voorhees, of Raton, for appellant Shedoudy.
PI. A. Kiker, of Raton, for appellant Cunico.
Fitzhugh & Fitzhugh, of Clovis, for appellants Bledsoe and Singer:
J. W. Armstrong, Atty. Gen., and J. P. Bujac, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Each of the defendants in the above-entitled causes was convicted under sections 1 and 2, c. 118, Laws, of 1923, which, as we have just held in State v. Armstrong, No. 2947, 242 P. 440, not as yet [officially] reported, are violative of section 18, art. 4, of the Constitution of this state. The judgment in each of said causes must therefore be reversed and remanded, with direction to discharge the accused.