Case Name: William H. BANKS WAREHOUSES, Inc., a corporation, and John Alfred Halford, Appellants, v. George L. WATT et al., Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1952-05-15
Citations: 196 F.2d 1018
Docket Number: No. 13112
Parties: William H. BANKS WAREHOUSES, Inc., a corporation, and John Alfred Halford, Appellants, v. George L. WATT et al., Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 196
Pages: 1018–1018

Head Matter:
William H. BANKS WAREHOUSES, Inc., a corporation, and John Alfred Halford, Appellants, v. George L. WATT et al., Appellees.
No. 13112.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit
May 15, 1952.
Rehearing Denied June 19, 1952.
J. L. Eberle, T. IT. Eberle and W. D. Eberle, all of Boise, Idaho, L. Duncan Lloyd, Wm. H. Hillier, Chicago, Ill. (Richards, Haga & Eberle, Boise, Idaho, Lord, Bissell & Kadyk, 'Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for appellants.
Ray D. Agee, Frank L. Stephan, Beck-with & Langley and Parry, Keenan, Robertson & Daly, all of Twin Falls, Idaho, for appellees.
William R. Wallace, Jr., Maynard Garrison, William R. Ray and John R. Pascoe, all of San Francisco, Cal., amici curia;.
Before MATHEWS, HEALY and BONE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This appeal is from a judgment in two consolidated actions — an action by William H. Banks Warehouses, Inc., and John Alfred Halford against W. Andrew Jean and others and an action by George L. Watt and others against William H. Banks Warehouses, Inc., and Underwriters at Lloyd's (London). On the grounds and for the reasons stated in the District Court's opinion, 96 F.Supp. 731, the judgment is affirmed.