Case Name: Cincinnati Bar Association v. Bortz
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1996-01-10
Citations: 74 Ohio St. 3d 207
Docket Number: No. 95-1669
Parties: Cincinnati Bar Association v. Bortz.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 74
Pages: 207–209

Head Matter:
Cincinnati Bar Association v. Bortz.
[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Bortz (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 207.]
(No. 95-1669
Submitted September 27, 1995
Decided January 10, 1996.)
Richard J. Ruebel, Hollis A. Moore III and Edwin W. Patterson III, for relator.
Helmer, Lugbill, Martins & Neff Co., L.P.A., and James B. Helmer, Jr., for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Upon review of the record, we concur in the board's finding of misconduct and its recommendation. Respondent is therefore publicly reprimanded for his violation of DR 5-101(A). Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.
Wright, J., dissents.