Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Lamont Brunson, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2017-10-12
Citations: 154 A.D.3d 499
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lamont Brunson, Appellant.
Judges: Concur — Tom, J.P., Renwick, Andrias, Singh and Moulton, JJ.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 154
Pages: 499–500

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lamont Brunson, Appellant.
[61 NYS3d 491]

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jill Konviser, J.), entered on or about April 6, 2016, which adjudicated defendant a level two sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court properly assessed points under the risk factor relating to defendant's relationship with a sex trafficking victim, because the evidence clearly established that defendant at least promoted the relationship for the purpose of such victimization, regardless of whether the victim had initiated conduct with defendant (see People v Cook, 29 NY3d 121, 126 [2017]). The court also properly assessed points under the risk factor for victimization of three or more persons, based upon clear and convincing evidence, contained in the case summary and the testifying victim's grand jury testimony (see People v Mingo, 12 NY3d 563, 572-573 [2009]), that numerous women worked as prostitutes for defendant while under the threat of force.
The court providently exercised its discretion when it declined to grant a downward departure (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841 [2014]). The mitigating factors cited by defendant were adequately taken into account by the risk assessment instrument, or were outweighed by the egregiousness of the underlying crime.
Concur — Tom, J.P., Renwick, Andrias, Singh and Moulton, JJ.