Case Name: Victor A. MOTLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VIRGINIA STATE BAR; Supreme Court of Virginia, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-04-25
Citations: 178 F. App'x 191
Docket Number: No. 05-2265
Parties: Victor A. MOTLEY, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. VIRGINIA STATE BAR; Supreme Court of Virginia, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 178
Pages: 191–192

Head Matter:
Victor A. MOTLEY, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. VIRGINIA STATE BAR; Supreme Court of Virginia, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 05-2265.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 7, 2006.
Decided: April 25, 2006.
Victor A. Motley, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Robert Messitt, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Victor A. Motley appeals the district court's order dismissing this action under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Motley v. Virginia State Bar, 403 F.Supp.2d 468 (E.D.Va.2005). We also deny Motley's motion to recuse. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
See District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 103 S.Ct. 1303, 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983); Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413, 44 S.Ct. 149, 68 L.Ed. 362 (1923).