Case Name: HAYNES v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1911-02-08
Citations: 139 S.W. 1155
Docket Number: 
Parties: HAYNES v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 139
Pages: 1155–1156

Head Matter:
HAYNES v. STATE.
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Feb. 8, 1911.
On Rehearing, Oct. 4, 1911.)
1. Bail (§ 65 ) — Appeal—Recognizance.
An appeal from a conviction of a misdemeanor cannot be sustained, where the recognizance does not state the amount of the punishment inflicted.
[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Bail, Cent. Dig. § 278; Dec. Dig. § 65. ]
On Rehearing.
2. Criminal Law (§ 1099 ) — Appeal—Statement op Facts — filing.
A statement of facts, filed in the trial court more than 20 days after adjournment of the court cannot be considered.
[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2866-2880; Dec. Dig. § 1099. ]
3. Intoxicating Liquors (§ 111 ) — Keeping House Where Liquors are Unlawfully Sold — Statutes—Repeal.
Acts 30th Leg. c. 132, prohibiting the keeping of a house in which spirituous, vinous, and malt liquors are sold and kept for sale without a license, was not repealed by the vagrancy act of 1909 (Acts 31st Leg. c. 59).
[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Intoxicating Liquors, Dec. Dig. § 111. ]
4. Intoxicating Liquors (§ 111 ) — Statutes —Construction.
Acts 30th Leg. c. 132, prohibiting the keeping of a house in which intoxicating liquors are sold and kept for sale without a license, is not in conflict with Acts 31st Leg. (1st Eix. Sess.) c. 15, prohibiting and making it a felony to pursue the occupation of unlawfully selling intoxicating liquors in prohibition territory, and neither act is in conflict with Acts 31st Leg. (1st Ex. Sess.) c. 35, making it a felony to unlawfully sell intoxicating liquors in prohibition territory.
[Ed. Note. — For other eases, see Intoxicating Liquors, Dec. Dig. § 111. ]
Appeal from Potter County Court; W. M. Jeter, Judge.
Jim Haynes was convicted of unlawfully keeping a house where intoxicating liquors were sold and kept for sale without a license, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
H. H. Cooper, for appellant. C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
For other cases see same topic and section NUMBER in Dec. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key No. Series & Rep’r Indexes

Opinion:
PRENDERGAST, J.
This is a misdemean- or case. The appellant was charged and convicted in the county court of Potter county with unlawfully keeping and knowingly permitting to be kept, etc., a house in said county in which spirituous, vinous, and malt liquors were sold and kept for sale without a license first having been obtained therefor, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $200 and 20 days in jail.
The Assistant Attorney General has made a motion to dismiss this appeal on the ground, among others, that the recognizance in this case does not state the amount of the punishment inflicted in the court below. The motion is well taken. See Merfett v. State, 135 S. W. 573, and authorities cited, this day decided.
The appeal is therefore dismissed.