Case Name: In the Matter of Edward L. New III, Petitioner, v. Lieutenant Vasile, as Hearing Officer, et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2016-07-28
Citations: 141 A.D.3d 1064
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Edward L. New III, Petitioner, v Lieutenant Vasile, as Hearing Officer, et al., Respondents.
Judges: Peters, P.J., McCarthy, Rose, Clark and Aarons, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 141
Pages: 1064–1065

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Edward L. New III, Petitioner, v Lieutenant Vasile, as Hearing Officer, et al., Respondents.
[35 NYS3d 670]-

Opinion:
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner approached a correction officer, informed the offi cer that he had information to tell him and then the pair went into a closet. Once inside, petitioner grabbed the officer's genitals and said, "[W]e are alone just me and you." As a result of this incident, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with engaging in forcible touching, assaulting staff, making threats and interfering with an employee. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty as charged. The determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal, and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
We confirm. The misbehavior report, related documentation and detailed testimony of its author provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Pellot v Fischer, 67 AD3d 1231, 1231 [2009]; Matter of Taveras v Fischer, 59 AD3d 827, 828 [2009], lv denied 13 NY3d 702 [2009]). Petitioner's claim that he did not intentionally touch or grab the correction officer presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of White v Prack, 131 AD3d 1333, 1334 [2015], lv denied 26 NY3d 920 [2016]). As to petitioner's claim that no force was used in the incident, forcible touching includes, among other conduct, grabbing (see 7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [2] [ii]). Finally, petitioner's remaining claims, including his assertion that the Hearing Officer was biased and that the penalty imposed was excessive, are .unpreserved for our review (see Matter of Wigfall v Department of Corr. Servs., 100 AD3d 1211, 1213 [2012]; Matter of Maldonado v New York State Dept. of Corr. Servs., 97 AD3d 873, 874 [2012]).
Peters, P.J., McCarthy, Rose, Clark and Aarons, JJ., concur.
Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.