Case Name: STATE of Alaska, Petitioner, v. Peter ANDREWS, Sr., and George R. Koenig, Respondents; STATE of Alaska, Petitioner, v. Harry N. COFFEY, Respondent
Court: Alaska Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Alaska
Decision Date: 1986-08-08
Citations: 723 P.2d 85
Docket Number: Nos. S-1172, S-1192
Parties: STATE of Alaska, Petitioner, v. Peter ANDREWS, Sr., and George R. Koenig, Respondents. STATE of Alaska, Petitioner, v. Harry N. COFFEY, Respondent.
Judges: Before RABINOWITZ, C.J., and BURKE, MATTHEWS, COMPTON and MOORE, JJ.
Reporter: Pacific Reporter 2d
Volume: 723
Pages: 85–88

Head Matter:
STATE of Alaska, Petitioner, v. Peter ANDREWS, Sr., and George R. Koenig, Respondents. STATE of Alaska, Petitioner, v. Harry N. COFFEY, Respondent.
Nos. S-1172, S-1192.
Supreme Court of Alaska.
Aug. 8, 1986.
Cynthia M. Hora, Asst. Atty. Gen., Anchorage and Harold M. Brown, Atty. Gen., Juneau, for petitioner.
John M. Murtagh, Anchorage, for respondent Andrews.
Laurel J. Peterson, Laurel J. Peterson, P.C., Anchorage, for respondent Koenig.
A. Michael Zahare, Bradbury, Bliss, & Riordan, Inc., Anchorage, for respondent Coffey.
Before RABINOWITZ, C.J., and BURKE, MATTHEWS, COMPTON and MOORE, JJ.

Opinion:
OPINION
PER CURIAM.
The issue in these consolidated cases is the proper interpretation of AS 12.55.025(e) and (g). The State contends that an offender convicted of separate counts of sexual assault must be sentenced to consecutive, rather than concurrent, terms. Having made a thorough examination of the matter, we have concluded that the opinion of the court of appeals in State v. Andrews, 707 P.2d 900 (Alaska App.1985), correctly treats and disposes of the issues involved, and we adopt such opinion as the opinion of this court.