Case Name: MINNISINK OIL COMPANY, INCORPORATED, APPELLANT, v. LOTTIE A. MILLER, RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1935-10-09
Citations: 115 N.J.L. 499
Docket Number: 
Parties: MINNISINK OIL COMPANY, INCORPORATED, APPELLANT, v. LOTTIE A. MILLER, RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 115
Pages: 499–499

Head Matter:
MINNISINK OIL COMPANY, INCORPORATED, APPELLANT, v. LOTTIE A. MILLER, RESPONDENT.
Submitted May 31, 1935
Decided October 9, 1935.
For the appellant, Collins & Corbin.
For the respondent, Frank Scerbo.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam, in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolesKell, Rafferty, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.