Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John HAMILTON, a/k/a Majestick, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-04-25
Citations: 646 F. App'x 326
Docket Number: No. 15-7822
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John HAMILTON, a/k/a Majestick, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 646
Pages: 326–327

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John HAMILTON, a/k/a Majestick, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-7822.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 21, 2016.
Decided: April 25, 2016.
John P. Hamilton, Appellant Pro Se. Gary L. Call, John J. Frail, Steven Loew, Assistant United States Attorneys, Charleston, West Virginia; John Lanier File, Assistant United States Attorney, Beckley, West Virginia; John Castle Parr, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
John Hamilton appeals the district court's ordér denying his 18 U.S.C, § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hamilton, No. 1:95-cr-00174-1 (S.D,W.Va. Nov. 6, 2015). We deny Hamilton's motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.