Case Name: McCREERY vs. CIRCUIT JUDGE (Bay)
Court: Michigan Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Michigan
Decision Date: 1892-11-18
Citations: 1 McGrath 455
Docket Number: No. 13092
Parties: McCREERY vs. CIRCUIT JUDGE (Bay),
Judges: 
Reporter: Mandamus cases decided in the Supreme court of Michigan
Volume: 1
Pages: 455–458

Head Matter:
McCREERY vs. CIRCUIT JUDGE (Bay),
No. 13092,
93 M., 463.

Opinion:
To compel discovery in a judgment creditor's suit.
Denied November 18, 1892, with costs.
The decision in Riopelle vs. Doellner, 26 M., 102, and in Sheldon vs. Walbridge, 44 Id., 251, that since parties have become general witnesses under our statutes, a bill of .discovery will not lie, where the facts sought to be discovered are within the knowledge of any witness, applies to a bill of discovery in aid of a suit at law.
The statute making parties competent witnesses did not repeal the statutory provisions (How. Stat., Secs. 6614, 6615, 6617, 8168, 8169) giving the Chancery Court power to compel a discovery in suits by judgment creditors to enforce their judgments; citing Hubbard vs. McNaughton, 43 M., 220; Turnbull vs. Lumber Co., 55 Id., 387.
A complainant is not entitled to file exceptions to. the voluntary answer of a corporation officer to a judgment creditor's bill, especially when the answer contains an express denial of the charges made in the bill.