Case Name: Elizabeth ANTON, a/k/a Elizabeth La Rossa, Appellant, v. DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATION, State of Florida DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1975-02-11
Citations: 308 So. 2d 50
Docket Number: No. 74-753
Parties: Elizabeth ANTON, a/k/a Elizabeth La Rossa, Appellant, v. DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATION, State of Florida DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Appellee.
Judges: Before PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 308
Pages: 50–51

Head Matter:
Elizabeth ANTON, a/k/a Elizabeth La Rossa, Appellant, v. DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATION, State of Florida DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Appellee.
No. 74-753.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 11, 1975.
Bretan, Marks, Attias & Raskin, Miami, for appellant.
Geoffrey B. Dobson and Winifred Sheridan Smallwood, Tallahassee, for appellee.
Before PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant La Rossa urges on this appeal that she should be granted a new trial in an eminent domain proceeding where she considers the jury award for her property to be insufficient. She urges that a new trial is in order because the court too severely limited cross-examination by the landowner's attorney of the condemning authority's witnesses. We have read the record and find that it does not support a holding of prejudicial error. There were full and complete cross-examinations of the expert witness and it is our conclusion that prejudicial error does not appear under the rule stated in Dabney v. Yapa, Fla.App. 1966, 187 So.2d 381.
Affirmed.