Case Name: In the Matter of Erich Milord, Petitioner, v. New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2015-02-25
Citations: 125 A.D.3d 972
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Erich Milord, Petitioner, v New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 125
Pages: 972–972

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Erich Milord, Petitioner, v New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, Respondent.
[1 NYS3d 854]—

Opinion:
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles Appeals Board dated May 28, 2013, which confirmed the determination of an administrative law judge dated January 18, 2013, after a hearing, finding that the petitioner violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 392, and imposed a penalty.
Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.
Judicial review of an administrative determination made after a hearing at which evidence was taken is limited to whether the determination is supported by substantial evidence based upon the entire record (see CPLR 7803 [4]). Moreover, the courts may not weigh the evidence or reject the choice made by an administrative agency where there is conflicting evidence and room for choice exists (see Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436, 444 [1987]).
Here, substantial evidence supports the determination of the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles Appeals Board that the petitioner violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 392 (see Matter of Wagner v Fiala, 113 AD3d 694 [2014]). Dillon, J.P., Leventhal, Chambers and Roman, JJ., concur.