Case Name: Mary L. Lynch, Petitioner v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review and Suburban General Hospital, Respondents
Court: Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1978-12-14
Citations: 39 Pa. Commw. 244
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 927 C.D. 1977
Parties: Mary L. Lynch, Petitioner v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review and Suburban General Hospital, Respondents.
Judges: to Judges Mencer, DiSalle and Craig, sitting as a panel of three.
Reporter: Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court Reports
Volume: 39
Pages: 244–246

Head Matter:
Mary L. Lynch, Petitioner v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review and Suburban General Hospital, Respondents.
Submitted on briefs, November 2, 1978,
to Judges Mencer, DiSalle and Craig, sitting as a panel of three.
December 14, 1978:
Shelley W. Elovitz, for petitioner.
George M. Cheever, Kirkpatrick, Lockhart, Johnson <& Hutchison, for respondent, Suburban General Hospital.

Opinion:
Per Curiam
Opinion,
This is a petition for review of an order of the Unemployment 'Compensation Board of Review (Board) which denied benefits to claimant Mary L. Lynch. We affirm the decision of the Board.
As to the issue of ineligibility because of failure to accept suitable wort, under Section 402(a) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law), Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. §802(a), we affirm on the basis of the reasons set forth in Lynch v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 35 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 159, 384 A.2d 1379 (1978), a related case dealing with the same claimant and facts.
Those same reasons also support the Board's denial of benefits under Section 402(b)(1) of the Law, 43 P.S. §802 (b) (1), relating to ineligibility for leaving employment without necessitous cause.
Per Curiam Order
And Now, this 14th day of December, 1978, the order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review dated April 19,1977, denying benefits to Mary L. Lynch, is affirmed.