Case Name: Robert Niel RUNKLE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1972-06-14
Citations: 484 S.W.2d 912
Docket Number: No. 44984
Parties: Robert Niel RUNKLE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 484
Pages: 912–918

Head Matter:
Robert Niel RUNKLE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
No. 44984.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
June 14, 1972.
Rehearing Denied Oct. 18, 1972.
Doran, Gulley & Murrah by Haygood Gulley, Del Rio, for appellant.
John F. Pettit, Dist. Atty., Del Rio, and Jim D. Vollers, State’s Atty., and Robert A. Huttash, Asst. State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
OPINION
ODOM, Judge.
This appeal is from a conviction for the offense of murder with malice. Punishment was assessed by the jury at confinement for a term of ninety-nine years.
Three grounds of error are alleged, all challenging the sufficiency of the evidence to corroborate the testimony of the accomplice witness and the sufficiency of the court's charge regarding the accomplice witness.
On April 2, 1970, Lloyd Mercer was employed by the Southern-Pacific Railroad as head brakeman on a train proceeding east from Del Rio to San Antonio. At approximately 9:30 P.M., while watching for obstacles along the track, he observed a body lying on the north side of the track at a point approximately seven miles from Spofford. The body was located at mile post 333.48 about seventy-five feet from a trestle. The body had not been there when the train had passed that point five hours earlier. It was wrapped in what appeared to be a dark coat. Mercer reported the incident to the conductor who alerted local authorities.
At approximately 10:10 P.M. on that same evening, John Caffee, an assistant special agent for the Southern Pacific Railroad, received a report concerning the finding of the body. He and A. L. Casper, a road master for the railroad, proceeded to a spot 7.22 miles east of Spofford where, at approximately 11:25 P.M., they found the body of the deceased lying approximately three feet from the ties on the north side of the tracks. Forty feet south of the railroad tracks was a farm to market road. West of the point where the body was located was a trestle bridge over a creek. The tracks were built upon an embankment which, at this point, was eight to nine feet above the road. The body was not visible from the road.
They discovered that the top portion of the body was covered with heavy black plastic shipping paper. Lifting the top edge of the paper, they ascertained that the deceased was male and observed á rope around his neck and blood on his face. Preliminary investigation by Caffee revealed that the ballast beside the tracks was not disturbed, as it would have been had the body been thrown from a passing train. Caffee then attempted to notify Kinney County Sheriff John A._ Sheedy; and upon learning that Sheriff Sheedy was already on his way to the scene, Caffee awaited the sheriff's arrival before investigating further.
Sheriff Sheedy arrived shortly thereafter, accompanied by Albert Postell, the Coroner for Kinney County. An examination of the body revealed that the deceased was wearing two pairs of pants, a "tee shirt", a regular shirt, a sport coat, and socks. The officers also determined that he weighed between 150 and 160 pounds and was approximately forty-five years old. Inside the watch pocket of the inner pair of pants worn by the deceased the officers found two twenty dollar bills. Other miscellaneous items were discovered in the pockets of the sport coat.
Fifteen feet west of the bridge, on the north side of the tracks, the officers discovered a broken pair of eye glasses and a bloody wine bottle. More blood was discovered sixty-one feet west of the body. In the creek bed, two large sheets of brown paper with blood on them were recovered. Within six feet of the body more of the blood-stained paper was found. The officers also discovered pieces of a broken wine bottle, several pieces of ⅛ inch grass rope, a bill-type cap, and some letters addressed to one James A. Key.
An ambulance was called, and the deceased was taken to a funeral home in Del Rio. At the funeral home, Del Rio Police Chief J. R. Koog obtained deceased's fingerprints. Identification of these fingerprints revealed that the deceased was James Alexander Key.
Caffee, meanwhile, checked the train schedules and learned that seven trains had passed the point where deceased had been found on that day, three of these having passed this point after 6 P.M. One of these, a west bound freight train, had been stopped there at 7:10 P.M. due to signal problems.
At 3:30 A.M. on April 3, 1970, that train made an unscheduled stop in Alpine. There, it was surrounded by law enforcement officers and searched. In a blue boxcar bearing number L & N 102468, Highway Patrolman Joe Hicks found appellant and James Frederick Franks. The officers removed the two men from the boxcar and placed them under arrest. A preliminary search of the boxcar was conducted by Deputy Mike Stutts of the Brewster County Sheriff's Office. Found in the car were a receipt bearing the deceased's name, a pocket knife, a piece of blood-stained cardboard, pieces of a broken wine bottle, a comb, a fingernail clipper, and some loose change.
The train then proceeded to Valentine, Texas, where boxcar numer L & N 102468 was left on a side track and again searched by Texas Ranger Arthur Hill. Ranger Hill discovered blood spots on the wall of the boxcar and other blood spots just outside of the door. Scrapings were taken at each place. Also recovered were some blood-stained paper and pieces of a broken wine bottle.
At 1:30 P.M., on April 3, 1970, an autopsy was conducted on the body of the deceased by Dr. Ruben C. Santos, Chief Medical Examiner for Bexar County. In Dr. Santos' opinion, " . . . there was no question that this man met his death by violence by asphyxia, by compression of the neck by some kind of artifact; by rope or something like that."
The evidence which had been gathered in this case was sent by Sheriff Sheedy to the Crime Laboratory at the Department of Public Safety in Austin. Chemical analysis revealed the presence of human blood on the rope taken from around the deceased's neck, on the black plastic paper which had covered the deceased, and on the paper found near the location of the body. The scrapings taken from the boxcar were also found to be human blood.
A joint indictment was returned against appellant and Franks charging them with the murder of James Alexander Key. Prior to appellant's trial, Franks' motion for severance was granted. The record reflects that at the time of appellant'-s trial, a motion to dismiss as to Franks was granted. Franks testified at appellant's trial and was declared by the court, in the charge to the jury, to be an accomplice witness as a matter of law.
Franks' testimony reveals that he, the deceased, and appellant boarded a boxcar in San Antonio. All three had been drinking wine heavily, and appellant and deceased were arguing. Franks went to sleep but was later awakened when a fight occurred between appellant and the deceased. Franks grabbed the deceased and held him while appellant allegedly placed a rope around the deceased's neck and began to choke him. Franks became tired and went back to sleep. When he awoke, he was in formed that Key was dead. Franks then assisted appellant in wrapping the body in a plastic material, placing the body beside the tracks when the train stopped, and throwing various items off of the train.
Article 38.14, Vernon's Ann.C.C.P., provides :
"A conviction cannot be had upon the testimony of an accomplice unless corroborated by other evidence tending to connect the defendant with the offense committed; and the corroboration is not sufficient if it merely shows the commission of the offense."
Recently, in Reynolds v. State (No. 44,841 5-3-72), this court held that:
"The test for determining the sufficiency of such corroboration is to eliminate the evidence of the accomplice from consideration and then ascertain whether there is other evidence of an incriminating nature which tends to connect the accused with the commission of the offense. E. g. Colunga v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 481 S.W.2d 866; Cherb v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 472 S.W.2d 273; Thomas v. State, 166 Tex.Cr.R. 331, 313 S.W.2d 311; Welden v. State, 10 Tex.App. 400. The mere showing that an offense occurred is not sufficient corroboration. Colunga v. State, supra; Odom v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 438 S.W.2d 912; Edwards v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 427 S.W.2d 629. Thus, evidence which verifies extraneous matters without tending to connect the accused to the crime is insufficient."
The corroborative evidence is sufficient if the cumulative weight of such evidence tends to connect the accused with the crime. There is no requirement that the corroborative testimony link the accused directly to the crime or be sufficient in itself to establish guilt. E. g. Reynolds, supra; Cherb v. State, supra.
In the instant case the evidence shows that: (1) the body of the deceased was found at 9:30 P.M. on April 2, 1970; (2) the cause of death was strangulation; (3) the body had not been at this location at 4:00 P.M. on that day; (4) a west bound freight train had stopped at 7:10 P. M. on that evening at the point where the deceased's body was found; (5) it appears that this was the only train stopped at that point on that date; (6) the ballast beside the tracks at the place where the deceased was found was not disturbed; (7) this same train was stopped at Alpine approximately eight hours later; (8) appellant and Franks were found in a boxcar at that time; (9) samples of human blood were found inside the boxcar; (10) a receipt bearing the deceased's name was found inside the boxcar; and (11) broken wine-bottle glass and bloodstained paper were found both in the boxcar and at the place where the body was found.
The evidence places appellant in a boxcar on the train which had stopped at the place where the deceased was found. Edwards v. State, supra. Such evidence places him in a boxcar on that train in which a struggle occurred and in which a receipt belonging to the deceased was found. Physical evidence, such as bloody paper and broken wine bottles, was found both in that boxcar and beside the body.
Thus, unlike Reynolds v. State, supra, the corroborative evidence presents circumstances from which a reasonable juror could infer that appellant was at the place where the crime was committed at the time such crime was committed. We hold that there is sufficient circumstantial evidence, absent the testimony of the accomplice, to link the accused to the crime.
The court's charge regarding the accomplice's testimony is substantially the same charge that was approved by this court in Burton v. State, 442 S.W.2d 354. See also, Branch's Ann.P.C.2d, Sec. 747.1. No error is shown.
Finding no reversible error, the judgment is affirmed.
. The record reflects that two westbound trains passed this point after 6:00 P.M., one at 7:10 P.M. and one at 11:00 P.M. The third train was the eastbound train upon which Mercer was riding when he saw the body.
. Two other men were removed from another boxcar on the train but were not held in connection with the instant case.
. We do not pass on the sufficiency of this evic not testified. ence to support a conviction had the accomplice