Case Name: RAILWAY ADVERTISING CO., Respondent, v. BAGGOT, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1901-04-22
Citations: 69 N.Y.S. 1144
Docket Number: 
Parties: RAILWAY ADVERTISING CO., Respondent, v. BAGGOT, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 69
Pages: 1144–1144

Head Matter:
RAILWAY ADVERTISING CO., Respondent, v. BAGGOT, Appellant.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
April 22, 1901.)
Action by the Railway Advertising Company against At-more L. Baggot. From a judgment for the plaintiff, defendant appeals.
Affirmed.
Milton Mayer, for appellant.
Einstein & Townsend, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The sole question here is as to the extent of an agent's authority. The evidence was conflicting. It was submitted to the jury in a fair and careful charge, and we see no reason to interfere with their verdict Judgment affirmed, with costs.