Case Name: Wilfredo Gonzalez LORA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Immigration and Naturalization Service (Ins), Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-10-19
Citations: 111 F. App'x 177
Docket Number: No. 04-6573
Parties: Wilfredo Gonzalez LORA, Petitioner—Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Immigration and Naturalization Service (Ins), Respondent—Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 111
Pages: 177–178

Head Matter:
Wilfredo Gonzalez LORA, Petitioner—Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Immigration and Naturalization Service (Ins), Respondent—Appellee.
No. 04-6573.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 14, 2004.
Decided Oct. 19, 2004.
Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora, Appellant pro se. William Joseph Howard, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora appeals from the district court's orders denying his petition for writ of mandamus and denying his motion to amend. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lora v. United, States Dep't of Justice, No. CA-02-1507-AM (E.D.Va. filed July 16, 2003 & entered July 17, 2003; Feb. 23, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED