Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mustafa MUHAMMAD, Defendant-Appellant; United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mustafa Muhammad, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-12-28
Citations: 707 F. App'x 197
Docket Number: No. 17-7258, No. 17-7430
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mustafa MUHAMMAD, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mustafa Muhammad, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 707
Pages: 197–198

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mustafa MUHAMMAD, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mustafa Muhammad, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 17-7258, No. 17-7430
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: December 21, 2017
Decided: December 28, 2017
Mustafa Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se. Heather Hart Mansfield, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
In No. 17-7258, Mustafa Muhammad appeals the denial of his motion for recusal, and in No. 17-7430, he appeals the denial of his Fed. R. Crim. P. 33 motion for new trial. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Muhammad, No. 3:14-cr-00066-REP-DJN-1 (E.D. Va. Sept. 12, 2017; Oct. 11, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED