Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darrell TURNER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-09-20
Citations: 143 F. App'x 713
Docket Number: No. 04-2378
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darrell TURNER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before POSNER, WOOD, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 143
Pages: 713–713

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darrell TURNER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 04-2378.
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Sept. 20, 2005.
William T. Grimmer, Office of the United States Attorney, South Bend, IN, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Mark S. Lenyo, South Bend, IN, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before POSNER, WOOD, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
We ordered a limited remand to ask whether the district judge, had he known the sentencing guidelines were advisory, would have imposed the same sentence on Darrell Turner. See United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005); United States v. Paladino, 401 F.3d 471, 484 (7th Cir.2005). The judge answered that he would.
We invited the parties to respond, but only the government did. Here, the sentencing range was properly calculated under the guidelines and thus presumptively reasonable. See United States v. Mykytiuk, 415 F.3d 606, 608 (7th Cir.2005). Because Turner has not rebutted that presumption, the judgment in appeal number 04-2378 is AFFIRMED.