Case Name: Michael E. HODGE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-04-18
Citations: 224 F. App'x 235
Docket Number: No. 06-7562
Parties: Michael E. HODGE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 224
Pages: 235–236

Head Matter:
Michael E. HODGE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 06-7562.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 17, 2006.
Decided: April 18, 2007.
Michael E. Hodge, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Michael Ranieri, Brian Eugene Bentley, Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Michael E. Hodge appeals the district court's orders dismissing his civil action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), and the Federal Tort Claims Act for injuries that he received as a result of surgery performed on his right foot. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Hodge v. United States, 443 F.Supp.2d 795 (E.D.Va.2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.