Case Name: NORTH ESSEX BUICK COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. EDWARD T. O'BRIEN ET AL., RESPONDENTS
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1932-10-17
Citations: 109 N.J.L. 350
Docket Number: 
Parties: NORTH ESSEX BUICK COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. EDWARD T. O’BRIEN ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 109
Pages: 350–351

Head Matter:
NORTH ESSEX BUICK COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. EDWARD T. O’BRIEN ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Submitted May 27, 1932 —
Decided October 17, 1932.
For the appellant, Emil Neblo.
For the respondents, Herman Wilson.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion filed in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Brogan, Van Buskirk, Kays, Dear, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.