Case Name: Leo Agress et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Agress Nut & Seed Co., Appellants, v. Omer C. Turkmenilli, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1951-03-27
Citations: 278 A.D. 691
Docket Number: 
Parties: Leo Agress et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Agress Nut & Seed Co., Appellants, v. Omer C. Turkmenilli, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 278
Pages: 691–691

Head Matter:
Leo Agress et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Agress Nut & Seed Co., Appellants, v. Omer C. Turkmenilli, Respondent.

Opinion:
The letter of credit of the Irving Trust Company states that it is "Identical with credit cabled to you through Chemical Bank & Trust Company, New York." The letter of credit of the Chase National Bank states, " Details of this credit advised by cable thru the Chemical Bank & Trust Company, New York, N. Y." It is not clear that the terms of the contract requiring the establishment of a letter of credit through the Chemical Bank & Trust Company were not complied with. The issue of compliance must await trial and, accordingly, the attachment should stand pending the trial of the issue. Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellants, and the motion denied. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Van Voorhis, Shientag and Heffernan, JJ. [See post, p. 764.]