Case Name: Joseph D. Bardo, respondent, v. Elizabeth Bardo, appellant
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1920-10-21
Citations: 92 N.J. Eq. 230
Docket Number: 
Parties: Joseph D. Bardo, respondent, v. Elizabeth Bardo, appellant.
Judges: For affirmance—The Ci-iiee-Justice, .Swayzé, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoi-i, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Ackerson—13.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 92
Pages: 230–230

Head Matter:
Joseph D. Bardo, respondent, v. Elizabeth Bardo, appellant.
[Decided October 21st, 1920.]
On appeal from a. decree, of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Lewis, whose opinion is reported in 92 N. J. Eq. 106.
Mr. Elmer W. Demurest, for the respondent.
Mr. Frank G. Turner, for the appellant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be .affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion, filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis. '.
For affirmance—The Ci-iiee-Justice, .Swayzé, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoi-i, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Ackerson—13.
For reversal—None.