Case Name: HUBBARD v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1927-06-15
Citations: 298 S.W. 893
Docket Number: No. 10946
Parties: HUBBARD v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 298
Pages: 893–894

Head Matter:
HUBBARD v. STATE.
(No. 10946.)
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
June 15, 1927.
Rehearing Denied Nov. 2, 1927.
E_arle Adams, Jr., of Houston, for appellant.
Sam D. Stinson, State’s Atty., and Robt. M. Lyles, Asst. State’s Atty., both of Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
BETHEA, J.
The appellant was convicted of the offense of barratry, and his punishment assessed at 30 days in the county jail.
Appellant was jointly indicted with C. E. McVey, C. J. Ginn, and E. K. Yollette, but was granted a severance. A jury having been waived, trial was had in the county court at law before Hon. Ben E. Wilson.
There are in the record no bills of exception. We do find, however, "Defendant's Exceptions to Indictment," at the terminus of which appears the following notation: "Defendant O. L. Hubbard's exceptions to indictment overruled." The trial judge's signature of authentication does-not appear in connection with this notation, and there are no exceptions bringing this matter forward for our review. We are therefore not authorized to consider same.
The questions raised in the motion to quash not relating to the substance of the indictment, and not being properly presented to this court, there remains nothing further for our consideration except the sufficiency of the evidence. We have carefully read the statement of facts, and find the evidence amply sufficient to sustain the verdict.
Finding no errors in the record, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
. PER CURIAM. The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.