Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carl L. LINYARD, a/k/a Gus, a/k/a Big Kahuna, a/k/a Kahuna, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-11-21
Citations: 703 F. App'x 195
Docket Number: No. 17-6964
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carl L. LINYARD, a/k/a Gus, a/k/a Big Kahuna, a/k/a Kahuna, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 703
Pages: 195–196

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carl L. LINYARD, a/k/a Gus, a/k/a Big Kahuna, a/k/a Kahuna, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 17-6964
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: November 16, 2017
Decided: November 21, 2017
Carl L. Linyard, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Nicholas Bianchi, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: .
Carl L. Linyard appeals the district court's orders denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction under Sentencing Guidelines Amendments 750 and 759 and his motion to reconsider that denial. We review these orders for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Muldrow, 844 F.3d 434, 437 (4th Cir. 2016). Our review of the record reveals no such abuse. As the district court noted, Linyard has filed previous unsuccessful motions asserting the same grounds. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's orders. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
The nonjurisdictional limit on motions to reconsider rulings on § 3582(c)(2) motions, United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir. 2010), is waived in the absence of a Government motion invoking the limitation, United States v. May, 855 F.3d 271, 274 (4th Cir. 2017), cert. denied, - U.S.L.W. -, 138 S.Ct. 252, 199 L.Ed.2d 124, No. 17-142, 2017 WL 3219499 (U.S. Oct. 2, 2017).