Case Name: STATE of Maine v. David DUPRAY
Court: Maine Supreme Judicial Court
Jurisdiction: Maine
Decision Date: 1982-07-30
Citations: 448 A.2d 328
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE of Maine v. David DUPRAY.
Judges: Before McKUSICK, C. J., and GOD-FREY, NICHOLS, ROBERTS and VIOL-ETTE, JJ.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 448
Pages: 328–329

Head Matter:
STATE of Maine v. David DUPRAY.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.
Argued May 12, 1982.
Decided July 30, 1982.
David M. Cox, Dist. Atty., Gary F. Thorne, Asst. Dist. Atty. (orally), Bangor, for plaintiff.
Warren M. Silver (orally), Bangor, for defendant.
Before McKUSICK, C. J., and GOD-FREY, NICHOLS, ROBERTS and VIOL-ETTE, JJ.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
The defendant, David Dupray, appeals from his conviction of unlawful traf ficking in scheduled drugs, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1103 (Supp.1981), after a jury trial in Superior Court, Penobscot County. On appeal, defendant contends (1) that the trial justice's instruction to the jury on the law of accomplice liability contained an error, and (2) that the evidence presented by the State was insufficient to support his conviction. Neither contention has merit. The trial justice's instruction to the jury on accomplice liability, considered in its entirety, correctly stated Maine law despite the use of one outmoded term. Towle v. Aube, Me., 310 A.2d 259, 266 (1973). Second, a careful review of the record reveals that sufficient evidence was presented from which a rational jury could find beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant was guilty of unlawful trafficking in scheduled drugs. State v. Libby, Me., 435 A.2d 1075, 1078 (1981). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of conviction.
The entry is:
Judgment affirmed.
All concurring.