Case Name: Casey Stuart MATTINGLY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2017-09-27
Citations: 227 So. 3d 744
Docket Number: CASE NO. 1D16-1014
Parties: Casey Stuart MATTINGLY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: RAY and KELSEY, JJ., and DOUGLAS, WESLEY R., ASSOCIATE JUDGE, CONCUR.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 227
Pages: 744–745

Head Matter:
Casey Stuart MATTINGLY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CASE NO. 1D16-1014
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Opinion filed September 27, 2017
Rehearing Denied October 17, 2017
Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Terry Roberts, Special Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and David Llanes, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The trial court properly handled Appellant's competency issues throughout this proceeding, and we find that the hearing addressing competency on September 23, 2014, at which the trial court orally adjudicated Appellant competent, satisfied the requirements of due process. However, we find well-taken the State's confession of error in the lack of a written order of competency following that hearing. Accordingly, we affirm Appellant's judgment and sentence, but remand solely for entry of an order of competency nunc pro tunc to the date of that hearing. See Zern v. State, 191 So.3d 962, 965 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016) (requiring court to enter a nunc pro tunc order of competency if appellant was competent at the time of hearing, whereupon the judgment and sentence need not change).
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED for further proceedings.
RAY and KELSEY, JJ., and DOUGLAS, WESLEY R., ASSOCIATE JUDGE, CONCUR.