Case Name: Pillsbury Co., plaintiff v. United States, defendant
Court: United States Court of International Trade
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1999-06-23
Citations: 23 Ct. Int'l Trade 383
Docket Number: Court No. 93-03-00161
Parties: Pillsbury Co., plaintiff v. United States, defendant
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Court of International Trade Reports
Volume: 23
Pages: 383–383

Head Matter:
Pillsbury Co., plaintiff v. United States, defendant
Court No. 93-03-00161
(Dated June 23, 1999)

Opinion:
JUDGMENT
Musgrave, Senior Judge:
It is hereby ordered, adjudged, and DECREED THAT defendant United States' revocation of (1) the authority of plaintiff The Pillsbury Company (Pillsbury) to use the Exporter's Summary Procedure (ESP) in its duty drawback claims, and (2) Pillsbury's blanket waiver of pre-export notification requirements for substitution unused merchandise/same condition drawback claims was contrary to law and void ab initio, and it is further;
Ordered, adjudged and decreed that any same condition drawback claims filed by Pillsbury concerning exports of fresh asparagus shall not be denied by defendant on the ground that Pillsbury did not provide defendant with advance notice of exportation of such goods.