Case Name: Orlando Rapheal CLARK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ernest R. SUTTON; Curtis E. Brown, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-10-16
Citations: 251 F. App'x 165
Docket Number: No. 07-6222
Parties: Orlando Rapheal CLARK, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Ernest R. SUTTON; Curtis E. Brown, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 251
Pages: 165–165

Head Matter:
Orlando Rapheal CLARK, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Ernest R. SUTTON; Curtis E. Brown, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 07-6222.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 11, 2007.
Decided: Oct. 16, 2007.
Orlando Rapheal Clark, Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Bulluck Ricci, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Orlando Rapheal Clark appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Clark v. Sutton, No. 5:05-ct-00724-H (E.D.N.C. Feb. 2, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.