Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Martin Finger, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2000-10-12
Citations: 95 N.Y.2d 894
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Martin Finger, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 95
Pages: 894–895

Head Matter:
[739 NE2d 290, 716 NYS2d 34]
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Martin Finger, Appellant.
Argued September 14, 2000;
decided October 12, 2000
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Kristina Schwarz, New York City, and M. Sue Wycoff for appellant.
William L. Murphy, District Attorney of Richmond County, Staten Island (Jonathan J. Silbermann and Karen F. McGee of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Defendant contends that the prosecution failed to present legally sufficient evidence that his reckless conduct occurred "under circumstances evincing a depraved indifference to human life" (Penal Law § 120.25). Defendant moved to dismiss on the ground "that the prosecution fail[ed] to prove each and every element of both counts of the indictment, beyond a reasonable doubt, as a matter of law." Defendant's general motion to dismiss is insufficient to preserve his argument for our review (see, People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 19-21; People v Bynum, 70 NY2d 858, 859). Defendant's remaining contention is without merit.
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt concur.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.