Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gregorio PENUELAS-SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-09-30
Citations: 333 F. App'x 275
Docket Number: No. 07-50314
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gregorio PENUELAS-SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: SILVERMAN, RAWLINSON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 333
Pages: 275–275

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gregorio PENUELAS-SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-50314.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 14, 2009.
Filed Sept. 30, 2009.
Before: SILVERMAN, RAWLINSON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Gregorio Penuelas-Sanchez appeals from the 60-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for importing cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 952, 960. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Penuelas-Sanchez contends that the 60-month sentence imposed by the district court is unreasonable, in light of the 41-month sentence agreed to by both parties, because the 41-month sentence is sufficient but not greater than necessary to accomplish the goals of sentencing. The record reflects that the sentence imposed is reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors. See United States v. Nichols, 464 F.3d 1117, 1124-26 (9th Cir.2006).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.