Case Name: Timothy STRAUSS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-05-18
Citations: 998 S.W.2d 43
Docket Number: No. 73498
Parties: Timothy STRAUSS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before JAMES R. DOWD, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 998
Pages: 43–44

Head Matter:
Timothy STRAUSS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 73498.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
May 18, 1999.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 27, 1999.
Application for Transfer Denied Sept. 21, 1999.
Dave Hemingway, Asst. Sp. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Karen L. Kramer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before JAMES R. DOWD, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant Timothy Strauss was convicted of one count of felony stealing, Section 570.030, RSMo 1994, and filed a motion to vacate judgment and sentence under Rule 29.15. Movant now appeals from the judgment denying his motion without an evi-dentiary hearing.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an extended opinion reciting detailed facts and restating principles of law. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).