Case Name: Douglas DRUGER, Claimant/Appellant, v. JEFFERSON CITY COCA COLA, Employer/Respondent, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2014-02-11
Citations: 423 S.W.3d 292
Docket Number: No. ED 99873
Parties: Douglas DRUGER, Claimant/Appellant, v. JEFFERSON CITY COCA COLA, Employer/Respondent, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent.
Judges: Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 423
Pages: 292–292

Head Matter:
Douglas DRUGER, Claimant/Appellant, v. JEFFERSON CITY COCA COLA, Employer/Respondent, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent.
No. ED 99873.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Feb. 11, 2014.
Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Douglas Druger appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's (Commission) decision finding that he was disqualified from unemployment benefits. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and record on appeal and conclude the Commission's decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence. Section 288.210 RSMo 2012. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm -the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).