Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julio C. PANTOJA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-12-01
Citations: 209 F. App'x 673
Docket Number: No. 06-30301
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julio C. PANTOJA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: LEAVY, GOULD and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 209
Pages: 673–673

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julio C. PANTOJA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-30301.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 27, 2006.
Filed Dec. 1, 2006.
James P. Hagarty, Esq., USYA-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Yakima, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Tracy A. Staab, Esq., FPDWA-Federal Public Defender’s Office (Eastern Washington & Idaho), Spokane, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: LEAVY, GOULD and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
A review of the record and the opening brief indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam).
Accordingly, appellee's motion for summary affirmance of the district court's judgment is granted. See United States v. Weaver, 433 F.3d 1104 (9th Cir.2006); United States v. Murillo, 422 F.3d 1152 (9th Cir.2005).
All pending motions are denied as moot.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.