Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony Gerald WHITE, Sr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-06-30
Citations: 283 F. App'x 161
Docket Number: No. 07-7708
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Anthony Gerald WHITE, Sr., Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 283
Pages: 161–161

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Anthony Gerald WHITE, Sr., Defendant—Appellant.
No. 07-7708.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 26, 2008.
Decided: June 30, 2008.
Anthony Gerald White, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Jane Meadoweroft Erisman, Christopher John Romano, Assistant United States Attorneys, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Gerald White, Sr., seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that White has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny White's motion to remand, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral ax'gument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.