Case Name: Victor MONTESINO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1994-08-02
Citations: 640 So. 2d 1196
Docket Number: No. 94-191
Parties: Victor MONTESINO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and COPE, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 640
Pages: 1196–1196

Head Matter:
Victor MONTESINO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 94-191.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Aug. 2, 1994.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Manuel Alvarez, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Stephanie G. Kolman, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and COPE, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We find no error in the sole point directed to the convictions entered below. See Nacher v. State, 465 So.2d 598 (Fla. 3d DCA1985). As the state concedes, however, it was improper to impose consecutive habitual offender sentences for offenses committed in the same criminal episode. See Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993). Hence, after remand, those sentences shall be made concurrent.
Affirmed as modified.