Case Name: Frank DEGRASSE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Craig FARWELL; et al., Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-07-08
Citations: 285 F. App'x 394
Docket Number: No. 07-15085
Parties: Frank DEGRASSE, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Craig FARWELL; et al., Respondents—Appellees.
Judges: Before: REINHARDT, LEAVY, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges. ' '
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 285
Pages: 394–395

Head Matter:
Frank DEGRASSE, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Craig FARWELL; et al., Respondents—Appellees.
No. 07-15085.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 18, 2008.
Filed July 8, 2008.
Debra A. Bookout,. Federal Public Defender’s Office, Las Vegas, NV, for Petitioner-Appellant.
Erik A. Levin, Office of the Nevada Attorney General, Carson City, NV, for Respondent-Appellee.
Before: REINHARDT, LEAVY, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges. ' '
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Frank DeGrasse appeals from the district court's judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we remand.
On June 11, 2008, this court received notice that DeGrasse has died. Accordingly, this petition is now moot. See Garceau v. Woodford, 399 F.3d 1101 (9th Cir.2005). This case is therefore remanded to the district court with instructions to dismiss the petition.
REMANDED with instructions.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provid-' ed by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.