Case Name: REVIER v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1926-12-22
Citations: 289 S.W. 1015
Docket Number: No. 10493
Parties: REVIER v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 289
Pages: 1015–1016

Head Matter:
REVIER v. STATE.
(No. 10493.)
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Dec. 22, 1926.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 19, 1927.)
E. L. Roark, of Dallas, for appellant.
Sam D. Stinson, State’s Atty., of Austin, and Robt. M. Dyles, Asst. State’s Atty., of Groesbeck, for tbe State.

Opinion:
MORROW, P. J.
Tbe offense is robbery; punishment fixed at confinement in tbe peni- ' tentiary for a period of 25 years.
C. A. Bristol was tbe injured party. According to bis testimony, the appellant and another man entered Bristol's place of residence, presented their pistols, and robbed him of a sum of money.
Tbe appellant's confession was introduced in evidence, in which be admitted tbe commission of tbe crime in company with Jack Wages.
Tbe testimony of tbe witness Bristol to tbe effect that be surrendered bis money because tbe appellant and bis companion presented guns and tbe witness was afraid to of•fer any resistance was not improperly received.
Tbe bill complaining of tbe testimony of tbe witness Fritz to tbe effect that, at tbe time of tbe arrest, there was taken from tbe appellant $14 in money, reveals no reversible error. Tbe $14 were not identified as having been tbe fruits of tbe crime. Tbe injured party, however, testified that tbe appellant and his companion took $175. Appellant's confession was to tbe same effect. The receipt of tbe testimony mentioned, even though it was immaterial, would not warrant a reversal.
Tbe judgment is affirmed.