Case Name: Murray Fritz, an Infant, by Abraham Fritz, His Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. Louis Friedland and Another, Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1924-06
Citations: 209 A.D. 889
Docket Number: 
Parties: Murray Fritz, an Infant, by Abraham Fritz, His Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. Louis Friedland and Another, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 209
Pages: 889–889

Head Matter:
Murray Fritz, an Infant, by Abraham Fritz, His Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. Louis Friedland and Another, Respondents.

Opinion:
Judgment reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the facts proven were such as to require submission of the question as to whether reasonable care did not require defendant to more securely pile the lumber, or to guard and protect it. (Earl v. Crouch, 10 N. Y. Supp. 882.) Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.