Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Jimmy BALENTINE, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1996-09-03
Citations: 928 S.W.2d 16
Docket Number: No. 68997
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Jimmy BALENTINE, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHAEtD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 928
Pages: 16–17

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Jimmy BALENTINE, Defendant/Appellant.
No. 68997.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Sept. 3, 1996.
Robert E. Steele, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for defendant/appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Cheryl A. Caponegro, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintifPresp ondent.
Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHAEtD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
In this jury-tried case, Defendant appeals after his conviction of burglary in the second degree, § 569.170. The trial court sentenced Defendant as a prior and persistent offender, § 558.016 and 558.019, to ten years' imprisonment. Defendant alleges the trial court erred in denying his motion for acquittal. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursu-ant to Rule 30.25(b).
. All cites are to RSMo 1994.