Case Name: HORENBURGER et al., Appellants, v. ROTH, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1903-06-22
Citations: 84 N.Y.S. 1130
Docket Number: 
Parties: HORENBURGER et al., Appellants, v. ROTH, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 84
Pages: 1130–1130

Head Matter:
HORENBURGER et al., Appellants, v. ROTH, Respondent.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
June 22, 1903.)
Action by Herman Horenburger and others against Isaac . Roth. Judgment for defendant dnd plaintiffs appeal. Affirmed.
A. J. Westermayr, for appellants. Hoffman & Wahle, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
There was nothing but a question of fact to be submitted to the jury in this case. This was done by the trial judge in a charge to which no exception was taken. We see no reason for disturbing the verdict of the jury. Judgment affirmed, with costs.