Case Name: NICK SCAGLIONE v. STATE OF FLORIDA
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1942-06-30
Citations: 151 Fla. 7
Docket Number: 
Parties: NICK SCAGLIONE v. STATE OF FLORIDA
Judges: BROWN, C. J., CHAPMAN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 151
Pages: 7–8

Head Matter:
NICK SCAGLIONE v. STATE OF FLORIDA
9 So. (2nd) 97
Division B
June 30, 1942
Rehearing Denied July 20, 1942
Cyrus W. Fields, for appellant.
J. Tom Watson, Attorney General, Millard B. Conklin, Assistant Attorney General, and Woodrow M. Melvin, Special Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Opinion:
TERRELL, J.:
Appellant, was convicted for conducting a lottery contrary to the Laws of Florida. On appeal, he challenges the sufficiency of the information, the failure of the Court to give charges with reference to the evidence of "spotters" and the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict.
The sufficiency of the information is concluded by Collier v. State, 116 Fla. 703, 156 So. 703, the challenge as to the charges is concluded by Section 215 (4) Criminal Procedure Act and the challenge as to the suffiieency of the evidence is concluded by La Barbara v. State, opinion filed May 29, 1942, not yet reported.
Affirmed.
BROWN, C. J., CHAPMAN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.