Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent on Review, v. GARY LAWRENCE SWADER, Petitioner on Review
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1985-08-27
Citations: 299 Or. 729
Docket Number: CC 10-82-06460; CA A28791; SC S31658
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent on Review, v. GARY LAWRENCE SWADER, Petitioner on Review.
Judges: MEMORANDUM OPINION
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 299
Pages: 729–731

Head Matter:
On appellant’s petition for review from decision of Court of Appeals,
petition allowed, case remanded to trial court for further proceedings August 27,1985
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent on Review, v. GARY LAWRENCE SWADER, Petitioner on Review.
(CC 10-82-06460; CA A28791; SC S31658)
705 P2d 196
John Daugirda, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, for petitioner on review. With him on the petition was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.
Robert E. Barton, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, for respondent on review. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and James E. Mountain, Jr., Solicitor General, Salem.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appeal from Lane County Circuit Court, Gregory G. Foote, Judge. 72 Or App 593, 697 P2d 557 (1985).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The defendant was convicted of Sodomy in the First Degree in a trial without a jury before the circuit court.
We allow review on the issues raised in the petition for review that the trial court erroneously admitted hearsay declarations of the alleged victim and that the defendant's state and federal confrontation rights were denied.
This case presents the same issues raised and decided in State v. Campbell, 299 Or 633, 705 P2d 694 (1985).
The Court of Appeals is reversed and the case remanded to the trial court for further proceedings not inconsistent with the decision in State v. Campbell, supra.