Case Name: Janice M. EMERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The JAMES F. LINCOLN ARC WELDING FOUNDATION; Lincoln Electric Company, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-01-29
Citations: 591 F. App'x 522
Docket Number: No. 14-2582
Parties: Janice M. EMERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The JAMES F. LINCOLN ARC WELDING FOUNDATION; Lincoln Electric Company, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before SMITH, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. .
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 591
Pages: 522–523

Head Matter:
Janice M. EMERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The JAMES F. LINCOLN ARC WELDING FOUNDATION; Lincoln Electric Company, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 14-2582.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 30, 2014.
Filed: Jan. 29, 2015.
Janice M. Emerson, Platte City, MO, pro se.
Justin Ijei, Christopher Turney, Rasmussen & Willis, Kansas City, MO, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before SMITH, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. .

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Janice Emerson appeals the district court's adverse grant of judgment on the pleadings in her pro se diversity action against The James F. Lincoln Arc Welding Foundation and Lincoln Electric Company. Upon careful de novo review, we conclude that Emerson's complaint was time-barred, and that her arguments on appeal are unavailing. See Ashley Cnty., Ark. v. Pfizer, Inc., 552 F.3d 659, 665 (8th Cir.2009) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. As to the motions filed by the parties in this court, we grant appellees' motion to seal documents to the extent the clerk's office determines that any documents are governed by Eighth Circuit Rule 25A(h) or Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2, and we deny all pending motions in all other respects.
. The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.