Case Name: Terrett v. Court of Appeals of the Seventh Appellate District et al.
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1960-03-23
Citations: 170 Ohio St. 439
Docket Number: No. 36306
Parties: Terrett v. Court of Appeals of the Seventh Appellate District et al.
Judges: Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taut, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and Peck, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, New Service
Volume: 170
Pages: 439–440

Head Matter:
Terrett v. Court of Appeals of the Seventh Appellate District et al.
(No. 36306
Decided March 23, 1960.)
Mr. Russell Terrett, in propria persona.
Mr. Mark McElroy, attorney general, and Mr. DeForest Mellon, for respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The petition fails to state operative facts which show that relator has no adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. A writ of prohibition will ordinarily not be allowed where there is an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law and may not be a substitute for appeal.
The demurrer to the petition is sustained, and the writ of prohibition is denied.
Demurrer sustained and writ denied.
Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taut, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and Peck, JJ., concur.