Case Name: In the Matter of City of New York, Appellant, Relative to the Melrose Commons Urban Renewal Area, Phase II. Kaiser Woodcraft Corp., Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2009-01-13
Citations: 11 N.Y.3d 903
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of City of New York, Appellant, Relative to the Melrose Commons Urban Renewal Area, Phase II. Kaiser Woodcraft Corp., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 11
Pages: 903–903

Head Matter:
In the Matter of City of New York, Appellant, Relative to the Melrose Commons Urban Renewal Area, Phase II. Kaiser Woodcraft Corp., Respondent.
Submitted December 1, 2008;
decided January 13, 2009

Opinion:
Motion for reargument denied with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements [see 11 NY3d 353 (2008)].