Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Robert V. Bogan, Appellant; In the Matter of Sebastian Pantonini, Doing Business as Castle Inn, Appellant, v. Martin C. Epstein et al., Constituting the State Liquor Authority, Respondents; In the Matter of Leonard J. Ortolano, Doing Business as Leonard's Grill, Petitioner, v. Martin C. Epstein et al., Constituting the State Liquor Authority, Respondents; In the Matter of James J. Mastrantonio, Deceased, by Elizabeth Mastrantonio, as Executrix, Appellant, v. Grant F. Daniels et al., Constituting the State Liquor Authority, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1961-10-26
Citations: 14 A.D.2d 836
Docket Number: 
Parties: (A) The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Robert V. Bogan, Appellant. (B) In the Matter of Sebastian Pantonini, Doing Business as Castle Inn, Appellant, v. Martin C. Epstein et al., Constituting the State Liquor Authority, Respondents. (C) In the Matter of Leonard J. Ortolano, Doing Business as Leonard’s Grill, Petitioner, v. Martin C. Epstein et al., Constituting the State Liquor Authority, Respondents. (D) In the Matter of James J. Mastrantonio, Deceased, by Elizabeth Mastrantonio, as Executrix, Appellant, v. Grant F. Daniels et al., Constituting the State Liquor Authority, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 14
Pages: 836–836

Head Matter:
(A) The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Robert V. Bogan, Appellant. (B) In the Matter of Sebastian Pantonini, Doing Business as Castle Inn, Appellant, v. Martin C. Epstein et al., Constituting the State Liquor Authority, Respondents. (C) In the Matter of Leonard J. Ortolano, Doing Business as Leonard’s Grill, Petitioner, v. Martin C. Epstein et al., Constituting the State Liquor Authority, Respondents. (D) In the Matter of James J. Mastrantonio, Deceased, by Elizabeth Mastrantonio, as Executrix, Appellant, v. Grant F. Daniels et al., Constituting the State Liquor Authority, Respondent.

Opinion:
[In each case] Motion to prosecute appeal on typewritten papers, and for other relief, denied.