Case Name: Yuriko ANDERSON and Jeffery Kayl, Plaintiffs-Petitioners, v. K. HOVNANIAN AT PORT IMPERIAL URBAN RENEWAL II, LLC, K. Hovnanian Companies Northeast, Inc., K. Hovnanian Homes, RTKL New Jersey Architects, PA, and FACE Associates, Inc., Defendants-Respondents, and SAY Service Company, Inc./MAX HVAC and Eastern Waterproofing & Restoration Co., Inc., Defendants. K. Hovnanian at Port Imperial Urban Renewal II, LLC, et al., Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. RTKL New Jersey Architects, PC, et al., Defendants/Third-Party Defendants. RTKL New Jersey Architects, PA, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff, v. FACE Associates, Inc., Third-Party Defendant.
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 2018-09-12
Citations: 193 A.3d 302
Docket Number: C-45 September Term 2018; 081200
Parties: Yuriko ANDERSON and Jeffery Kayl, Plaintiffs-Petitioners,
v.
K. HOVNANIAN AT PORT IMPERIAL URBAN RENEWAL II, LLC, K. Hovnanian Companies Northeast, Inc., K. Hovnanian Homes, RTKL New Jersey Architects, PA, and FACE Associates, Inc., Defendants-Respondents,
and
SAY Service Company, Inc./MAX HVAC and Eastern Waterproofing & Restoration Co., Inc., Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 193
Pages: 302–302

Head Matter:
Yuriko ANDERSON and Jeffery Kayl, Plaintiffs-Petitioners,
v.
K. HOVNANIAN AT PORT IMPERIAL URBAN RENEWAL II, LLC, K. Hovnanian Companies Northeast, Inc., K. Hovnanian Homes, RTKL New Jersey Architects, PA, and FACE Associates, Inc., Defendants-Respondents,
and
SAY Service Company, Inc./MAX HVAC and Eastern Waterproofing & Restoration Co., Inc., Defendants.
K. Hovnanian at Port Imperial Urban Renewal II, LLC, et al., Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs,
v.
RTKL New Jersey Architects, PC, et al., Defendants/Third-Party Defendants.
RTKL New Jersey Architects, PA, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff,
v.
FACE Associates, Inc., Third-Party Defendant.
C-45 September Term 2018
081200
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
September 12, 2018
ORDER

Opinion:
A petition for certification of the judgment in A-005209-15 having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;
It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied, with costs.