Case Name: Rochelle DARMAN, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Alice BERKOWITZ, Appellee/Cross-Appellant
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-04-19
Citations: 652 So. 2d 1287
Docket Number: No. 93-3544
Parties: Rochelle DARMAN, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Alice BERKOWITZ, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
Judges: HERSEY, GLICKSTEIN and POLEN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 652
Pages: 1287–1288

Head Matter:
Rochelle DARMAN, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Alice BERKOWITZ, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
No. 93-3544.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
April 19, 1995.
Martin J. Sperry and Joseph S. Kashi of Sperry, Shapiro & Kashi, Fort Lauderdale, for appellanVcross-appellee.
Richard A. Sherman and Rosemary B. Wilder of Law Offices of Richard A. Sherman, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, and Law Offices of Alan L. Landsberg, Hollywood, for appel-lee/cross-appellant.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We find no error in the cross-appeal or the second point on direct appeal. We find er ror, however, in the trial court's refusal to allow the jury to consider the issue of future medical expenses regardless of whether there was evidence to support a finding that a permanent injury was sustained. We reverse and remand for retrial on this issue only, which retrial should be guided by the supreme court's rationale in Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Tompkins, 651 So.2d 89 (Fla.1995).
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART.
HERSEY, GLICKSTEIN and POLEN, JJ., concur.