Case Name: Andrew BARTLIK, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY, Respondents
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1994-12-02
Citations: 34 F.3d 368
Docket Number: Nos. 93-3616, 93-3834
Parties: Andrew BARTLIK, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY, Respondents.
Judges: Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge; KEITH, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, and DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 34
Pages: 366–366

Head Matter:
Andrew BARTLIK, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY, Respondents.
Nos. 93-3616, 93-3834.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Dec. 2, 1994.
Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge; KEITH, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, and DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:
The effect of the granting of a hearing en bane shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.
The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.