Case Name: CITY OF CORNING, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO. et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1912-11-20
Citations: 138 N.Y.S. 1111
Docket Number: 
Parties: CITY OF CORNING, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO. et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 138
Pages: 1111–1111

Head Matter:
CITY OF CORNING, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO. et al., Respondents.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
November 20, 1912.)
Action by the City of Coming against the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company and another.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Judgment, so far as appealed from, affirmed with costs.
McLennan, P. J., and LAMBERT, J., dissent, upon the ground that the entire structure between the two stone abutments constitutes a bridge within the meaning of the statute.