Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gustavo Adolfo AYALA-ALEMAN, also known as Carlos Rafael Barroso, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-12-15
Citations: 624 F. App'x 290
Docket Number: No. 14-40842
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gustavo Adolfo AYALA-ALEMAN, also known as Carlos Rafael Barroso, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before JONES, SOUTHWICK, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 624
Pages: 290–290

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gustavo Adolfo AYALA-ALEMAN, also known as Carlos Rafael Barroso, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 14-40842
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 15, 2015.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s- Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Philip G. Gallagher, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Scott Andrew Martin, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Gustavo Adolfo Ayala-Aleman, Pekin, IL, pro se.
Before JONES, SOUTHWICK, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Gustavo Adolfo Ayala-Ale-man has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Ayala-Aleman has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.