Case Name: Ace Tackless Corporation, Respondent, v. American Tackless Corporation et al.,Defendants, and Irving Alexander et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1957-01-21
Citations: 3 A.D.2d 672
Docket Number: 
Parties: Ace Tackless Corporation, Respondent, v. American Tackless Corporation et al.,Defendants, and Irving Alexander et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 3
Pages: 672–672

Head Matter:
Ace Tackless Corporation, Respondent, v. American Tackless Corporation et al.,Defendants, and Irving Alexander et al., Appellants.

Opinion:
Appeal from an order granting a motion to vacate appellants' notice to examine respondent before trial. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied; the examination to proceed on five days' notice. Appellants are entitled to examine respondent to establish their affirmative defense that the contract sued upon is illegal (Borger v. Buegg, 272 App. Div. 917; Schatzlcin v. State Laundry Co., 63 N. Y. S. 2d 446). Wenzel, Acting P. J,, Beldoek, Murphy, TTahetta and Kleinfeld, JJ., corieur,