Case Name: MINNIE HANSEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ADOLPH JANITSCHEK, INDIVIDUALLY, ETC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1960-02-22
Citations: 31 N.J. 545
Docket Number: 
Parties: MINNIE HANSEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ADOLPH JANITSCHEK, INDIVIDUALLY, ETC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 31
Pages: 545–547

Head Matter:
MINNIE HANSEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ADOLPH JANITSCHEK, INDIVIDUALLY, ETC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Argued February 9, 1960
Decided February 22, 1960.
Mr. Joseph G. Glavin argued the cause for the ajipellant.
Mr. Louis Auerbacher, Jr., argued the cause for the.respondent {Mr. Samuel B. Blaine, on the brief).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Conford in that court, and the matter is remanded to the trial judge who heard the ease for reconsideration and a new determination.
For reversal—Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Burling, Jacobs, Erancis, Proctor, Hall and Schet-TINO—7.
For affirmance—Hone.