Case Name: Steven James RODASTI, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1991-06-12
Citations: 815 S.W.2d 591
Docket Number: No. 751-90
Parties: Steven James RODASTI, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
Judges: CLINTON, J., dissents.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 815
Pages: 591–591

Head Matter:
Steven James RODASTI, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
No. 751-90.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.
June 12, 1991.
Rehearing Denied Sept. 18, 1991.
Robert J. Inger, Houston, for appellant.
John B. Holmes, Jr., Dist. Atty., and Alan Curry and Bill Delmore, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, Robert Huttash, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
OPINION ON THE STATE'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
McCORMICK, Presiding Judge.
A jury convicted appellant, Steven James Rodasti, of aggravated sexual assault and assessed his punishment at confinement for life. Appellant appealed. The Court of Appeals initially affirmed the conviction. Rodasti v. State, 749 S.W.2d 161 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1988). Upon discretionary review this Court vacated the lower appellate court's judgment and remanded the case to it. Rodasti v. State, 786 S.W.2d 294 (Tex.Cr.App.1989). Upon remand from this Court, the Court of Appeals affirmed appellant's conviction but, finding reversible error in the punishment phase of trial, the Court remanded the case to the trial court for resentencing. Rodasti v. State, 790 S.W.2d 379 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1990). Thereafter, the State filed its petition for discretionary review.
We now summarily grant the State's petition, vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand this case to it to consider its opinion in light of our decision in Reed v. State, 811 S.W.2d 582 (Tex.Cr.App.1991).
CLINTON, J., dissents.