Case Name: WILLIAM E. TUTTLE, Jr., ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. GEORGE I. APGAR ET AL., APPELLANTS
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1915-11-30
Citations: 88 N.J.L. 742
Docket Number: 
Parties: WILLIAM E. TUTTLE, Jr., ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. GEORGE I. APGAR ET AL., APPELLANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 88
Pages: 742–743

Head Matter:
WILLIAM E. TUTTLE, Jr., ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. GEORGE I. APGAR ET AL., APPELLANTS.
Argued November 30, 1915
Decided November 30, 1915.
On appeal from the Middlesex Circuit Court.
For the appellants, J. Henry Crane.
For the respondents, Paul Q. Oliver.

Opinion:
Pur Curiam.
This case was tried before Judge Lloyd in the. Middlesex Circuit Court without a jury, who gave judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, and defendants appealed.
The record brought up fails to show any request to the trial court, by the appealing party, to make a finding or findings of law or fact, or law and fact, or any exception or objection to the adverse finding made. On this record there is nothing to be reviewed. Blanchard Brothers v. Beveridge, 86 N. J. L. 561. See, also, Webster v. Freeholders of Hudson, Id. 256.
The judgment, under review must be affirmed.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Syvayze, Teenchabd, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoh, Black, Vbedkxbuegh, White, Teehune, HepPJENHEIMKR, WILLIAMS, TAYLOE, JJ. 16.
Fo reversal—Kone.