Case Name: Kenneth R. SKAGGS, Jr., Petitioner/Appellant, v. Denise R. SKAGGS, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2009-02-24
Citations: 279 S.W.3d 219
Docket Number: No. ED 91112
Parties: Kenneth R. SKAGGS, Jr., Petitioner/Appellant, v. Denise R. SKAGGS, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., and MARY K. HOFF, J„ and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 279
Pages: 219–220

Head Matter:
Kenneth R. SKAGGS, Jr., Petitioner/Appellant, v. Denise R. SKAGGS, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 91112.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Feb. 24, 2009.
Joseph T. Bante, The Bante Law Firm, Amanda Ann Kurlandski, Co-Counsel, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Deborah M. Bird, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., and MARY K. HOFF, J„ and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Kenneth R. Skaggs Jr. (Husband) appeals from the trial court's denial of Husband's Motion for Declaration of Judgment or in the Alternative to Set Judgment Aside more than thirty days following the trial court's entry of judgment of dissolution of the marriage of Husband and Denise R. Skaggs.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).