Case Name: Stephen M. FILLA, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2016-04-12
Citations: 485 S.W.3d 827
Docket Number: No. ED 102981
Parties: Stephen M. FILLA, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 485
Pages: 827–827

Head Matter:
Stephen M. FILLA, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 102981
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Filed: April 12, 2016
Matthew W. Huckeby, Office of Missouri Public Defender, 1010 Market St., Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for Respondent.
Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Stephen M. Filia appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).