Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Joel Edward GEYER, Sr., also known as Joel Geyer, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-12-02
Citations: 317 F. App'x 569
Docket Number: No. 07-3674
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Joel Edward GEYER, Sr., also known as Joel Geyer, Appellant.
Judges: Before MURPHY, BYE, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 317
Pages: 569–570

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Joel Edward GEYER, Sr., also known as Joel Geyer, Appellant.
No. 07-3674.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 22, 2008.
Filed: Dec. 2, 2008.
Debra L. Scorpiniti, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Des Moines, IA, for Appellee.
Gerald Feuerhelm, Des Moines, IA, for Appellant.
Joel Edward Geyer, Sr., Newton, IA, pro se.
Before MURPHY, BYE, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Joel Geyer challenges the prison sentence the district court imposed after he pleaded guilty to drug and firearm charges. At sentencing, the court determined that Geyer was a career offender, see U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1, because he had prior felony convictions for bank robbery and operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated (OWI). On appeal, Geyer argues that he should not have been classified as a career offender because his OWI conviction is not a "crime of violence."
While this case was pending on appeal, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Begay v. United States, — U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 1581, 170 L.Ed.2d 490 (2008), holding that the crime of driving under the influence is not a "violent felony" under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA). See id. at 1583, 1588. Consequently, the district court improperly calculated Geyer's advisory Guidelines range when it determined that his prior OWI conviction is a "crime of violence." See United States v. Williams, 537 F.3d 969, 971 (8th Cir.2008) (this court has never recognized distinction between "crime of violence" and "violent felony"); United States v. Comstock, 531 F.3d 667, 678-79 (8th Cir.2008)(rehearing denied) (OWI convictions are not ACCA "violent felonies"); see also Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 128 S.Ct. 586, 594, 596-97, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007) (as part of reasonableness review, appellate court must first ensure that dis trict court committed no significant procedural error, such as improperly calculating Guidelines range).
Accordingly, we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing.