Case Name: ALFREDO CORTES AND CARMEN CORTES, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. INTERBORO MUTUAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1989-05-11
Citations: 115 N.J. 190
Docket Number: 
Parties: ALFREDO CORTES AND CARMEN CORTES, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. INTERBORO MUTUAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 115
Pages: 190–190

Head Matter:
ALFREDO CORTES AND CARMEN CORTES, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. INTERBORO MUTUAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Argued March 13, 1989
Decided May 11, 1989.
Manfred F Salomon argued the cause for appellants {Salomon and Blackman, attorneys).
Peter A. Piro argued the cause for respondent {Haskins, Hack, Piro, O’Day, Merklinger & Wallace, attorneys.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division reported at 232 N.J.Super. 519 (1988).