Case Name: Elijah Pope et al., Appellants, v. New York Property Insurance Underwriting Association, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1985-11-19
Citations: 66 N.Y.2d 857
Docket Number: 
Parties: Elijah Pope et al., Appellants, v New York Property Insurance Underwriting Association, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 66
Pages: 857–859

Head Matter:
Elijah Pope et al., Appellants, v New York Property Insurance Underwriting Association, Respondent.
Decided November 19, 1985
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Howard R. Birnbach for appellants.
Arthur N. Brook and Carole P. Sadler for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), appeal, insofar as taken from so much of the order of the Appellate Division as dismissed part of plaintiffs' first cause of action, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Order, insofar as it dismissed and severed the second cause of action, affirmed, with costs. A complaint alleging fraud based on a statement of future intention must allege facts sufficient to show that the promisor, at the time the representation was made, never intended to honor the promise (Lanzi v Brooks, 43 NY2d 947).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander and Titone.