Case Name: Luis O. RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2004-11-10
Citations: 890 So. 2d 280
Docket Number: No. 3D01-2017
Parties: Luis O. RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before COPE and GODERICH, JJ., and NESBITT, JOSEPH, Senior Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 890
Pages: 280–281

Head Matter:
Luis O. RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D01-2017.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 10, 2004.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 5, 2005.
Mark Graham Hanson, for appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Jill K. Traina, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before COPE and GODERICH, JJ., and NESBITT, JOSEPH, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Henderson v. State, 626 So.2d 310, 311 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993) ("Relief is not warranted where counsel merely fails to inform a client about the various ramifications of gain time as opposed to volunteering incorrect information."); Simmons v. State, 611 So.2d 1250, 1252 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992) ("Neither the trial court nor counsel is required to forewarn a defendant about every conceivable collater al consequence of a plea to criminal charges."); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c).