Case Name: Fred Lewis WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. C/O ROBERTS; C/O Tabor; Sgt. Ely, Defendants-Appellees, and B. Collins, Sgt.; M. Williams, C/O; H. Bishop, C/O; J. Durham, C/O; Sgt. King; Lt. Kilbourne; C/O Hylton; C/O Boyd; Ted Thompson, Dr.; M. Stanford, RN; Melissa Spears, LPN; Patsy Garnette Zeppa, RN; Patricia Hillman, RN, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-12-22
Citations: 405 F. App'x 735
Docket Number: No. 10-6949
Parties: Fred Lewis WILSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. C/O ROBERTS; C/O Tabor; Sgt. Ely, Defendants—Appellees, and B. Collins, Sgt.; M. Williams, C/O; H. Bishop, C/O; J. Durham, C/O; Sgt. King; Lt. Kilbourne; C/O Hylton; C/O Boyd; Ted Thompson, Dr.; M. Stanford, RN; Melissa Spears, LPN; Patsy Garnette Zeppa, RN; Patricia Hillman, RN, Defendants.
Judges: Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 405
Pages: 735–735

Head Matter:
Fred Lewis WILSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. C/O ROBERTS; C/O Tabor; Sgt. Ely, Defendants—Appellees, and B. Collins, Sgt.; M. Williams, C/O; H. Bishop, C/O; J. Durham, C/O; Sgt. King; Lt. Kilbourne; C/O Hylton; C/O Boyd; Ted Thompson, Dr.; M. Stanford, RN; Melissa Spears, LPN; Patsy Garnette Zeppa, RN; Patricia Hillman, RN, Defendants.
No. 10-6949.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 6, 2010.
Decided: Dec. 22, 2010.
See also, 2010 WL 291829.
Fred Lewis Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Fred Lewis Wilson appeals the district court's judgment entered after a jury found in favor of Appellees and denied relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record, conclude that the issues Wilson raises do not present substantial questions, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we decline to authorize preparation of the trial transcript at government expense and affirm the judgment of the district court. We grant Wilson's motion to withdraw his September 2010 motion for production of documents and deny Wilson's October 2010 motion for production of documents. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.