Case Name: Douglas Roy FLETCHER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1955-05-11
Citations: 282 S.W.2d 230
Docket Number: No. 27602
Parties: Douglas Roy FLETCHER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 282
Pages: 230–232

Head Matter:
Douglas Roy FLETCHER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
No. 27602.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
May 11, 1955.
Rehearing Denied June 22, 1955.
No appearance on appeal for appellant.
Henry Wade, Crim. Dist. Atty., Thomas Thorpe, Asst. Dist. Atty., Charles S. Potts, Asst. Dist. Atty., Dallas, Leon Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
DICE, Commissioner.
The conviction is for the unlawful possession of marihuana; the punishment, three years in the penitentiary.
The record is before us without a statement of facts.
Eleven formal bills of exception appear in the record. These bills present appellant's exceptions to the rulings of the court in overruling his motions for an instructed verdict because of the alleged insufficiency of the evidence; exceptions to the rulings of the court on the admission and rejection of testimony; and to the refusal of the court to give certain charges requested by the appellant.
In the absence of a statement of facts, we are unable to pass upon the matters raised by these bills of exception. Welch v. State, 134 Tex.Cr.R. 564, 116 S.W.2d 389; Metcalf v. State, 156 Tex.Cr.R. 575, 244 S.W.2d 818; Whistler v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 244 S.W.2d 818; Mason v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 244 S.W.2d 216; Conde v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 252 S.W.2d 195.
All proceedings appearing regular, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Opinion approved by the Court.