Case Name: James BEHAN, Appellant, v. Judith A. BEHAN, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-03-27
Citations: 595 So. 2d 586
Docket Number: No. 91-00565
Parties: James BEHAN, Appellant, v. Judith A. BEHAN, Appellee.
Judges: CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and PARKER and ALTENBÉRND, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 595
Pages: 586–587

Head Matter:
James BEHAN, Appellant, v. Judith A. BEHAN, Appellee.
No. 91-00565.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
March 27, 1992.
Ann Loughridge Kerr, Clearwater, and Law Offices of Elser, Greene & Hodor, Miami, for appellant.
Carl T. Boake of Wallace, Finck & Boake, St. Petersburg, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court's final judgment of dissolution of marriage. We base this affirmance upon our conclusion that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in imputing to Mr. Behan the ability to achieve an income of $120,000 per year, which would satisfy the obligations imposed by the trial court in its final judgment. See Scapin v. Scapin, 547 So.2d 1012 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).
CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and PARKER and ALTENBÉRND, JJ., concur.