Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rhea Ann Swinson JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-12-05
Citations: 52 F. App'x 69
Docket Number: No. 01-50055; D.C. No. CR-00-00561-AHM
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Rhea Ann Swinson JACKSON, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before GOODWIN, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 52
Pages: 69–69

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Rhea Ann Swinson JACKSON, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 01-50055.
D.C. No. CR-00-00561-AHM.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 2, 2002.
Decided Dec. 5, 2002.
Before GOODWIN, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Rhea Ann Swinson Jackson appeals from the judgment imposed following her guilty-plea conviction for two counts of bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Jackson's counsel has filed a brief stating that she finds no meritorious issues for review, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our examination of the briefs and our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no arguable issues for review on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.