Case Name: In re the Marriage of Roxanne E. BUNT, Respondent, v. Douglas R. BUNT, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-02-15
Citations: 25 S.W.3d 499
Docket Number: No. ED 75501
Parties: In re the Marriage of Roxanne E. BUNT, Respondent, v. Douglas R. BUNT, Appellant.
Judges: Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, Jr., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and ROBERT E. CRIST, Senior Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 25
Pages: 499–499

Head Matter:
In re the Marriage of Roxanne E. BUNT, Respondent, v. Douglas R. BUNT, Appellant.
No. ED 75501.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Feb. 15, 2000.
Mary Margaret Creamer, Richard W. Fischer, St. Louis, for appellant.
Bernhardt W. Klippel, III, Gary J. Morris, Clayton, for respondent.
Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, Jr., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and ROBERT E. CRIST, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Husband, Douglas R. Bunt, appeals from the decree of dissolution of his marriage to wife, Roxanne E. Bunt.
We have reviewed the record on appeal and find the judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).