Case Name: SIRMANS v. ALLEN, Executor, et al.; and vice versa
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1966-01-06
Citations: 221 Ga. 703
Docket Number: 23273, 23274
Parties: SIRMANS v. ALLEN, Executor, et al.; and vice versa.
Judges: All the Justices concur.
Reporter: Georgia Reports
Volume: 221
Pages: 703–704

Head Matter:
23273, 23274.
SIRMANS v. ALLEN, Executor, et al.; and vice versa.
Submitted December 14, 1965
Decided January 6, 1966
Rehearing denied January 18, 1966.
W. D. Knight, E. R. Smith, Sr., for appellant.
J. Lundie Smith, John W. Langdale, for appellees.

Opinion:
Duckworth, Chief Justice.
It appearing from the pleadings, the evidence — none of which contradicts the records in the lower court — and the motion for summary judgment that the appellant-plaintiff had previously filed a bill in equity against the defendants, now cross appellants and appellees, alleging in substance the same suit to recover the same property by an alleged implied trust, to which general demurrers had been renewed • after amendment and thereafter sustained after a hearing, and no appeal therefrom taken, the two cases being between the same parties, or their privies, and being the same issue or under which all issues between the parties might have been considered, the judgment sustaining the demurrers and dismissing the case is conclusive between the parties, and is res judicata. Darling Stores Corp. v. Beatus, 199 Ga. 215 (33 SE2d 701); Dixon v. Dixon, 211 Ga. 122, and cases cited at page 124 (84 SE2d 37). The lower court erred in refusing to grant the motion for summary judgment. While the trial judge in each case was the same, and he states in his order denying the summary judgment that the merits were not passed on in ruling on the demurrers to the first case filed, yet the record clearly shows that the general demurrers had been sustained, and the petition dismissed for that reason. The ruling on the cross appeal requiring the reversal of the lower court renders it unnecessary to consider the main appeal.
Judgment reversed on the cross appeal; main appeal dismissed.
All the Justices concur.