Case Name: Muriel Hirsch and Alcon Hirsch, her husband, Plaintiffs in Error, vs. Harmon Neill, Defendant in Error
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1932-11-03
Citations: 107 Fla. 168
Docket Number: 
Parties: Muriel Hirsch and Alcon Hirsch, her husband, Plaintiffs in Error, vs. Harmon Neill, Defendant in Error.
Judges: Buford, C.J. and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 107
Pages: 168–169

Head Matter:
Muriel Hirsch and Alcon Hirsch, her husband, Plaintiffs in Error, vs. Harmon Neill, Defendant in Error.
144 So. 306.
Division A.
Decision filed November 3, 1932.
Boone T. Coulter, for Plaintiff in Error;
Oppenborn & Mincer, for Defendant in Error.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to' the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Buford, C.J. and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.