Case Name: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PROSECUTOR-RESPONDENT, v. CONSUMER-FARMER MILK COOPERATIVE, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1950-05-03
Citations: 7 N.J. Super. 276
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PROSECUTOR-RESPONDENT, v. CONSUMER-FARMER MILK COOPERATIVE, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 7
Pages: 276–277

Head Matter:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PROSECUTOR-RESPONDENT, v. CONSUMER-FARMER MILK COOPERATIVE, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued May 1, 1950
Decided May 3, 1950.
Before Judges Colte, Jayne and Eastwood.
Mr. Reuben P. Goldstein argued the cause for appellant.
Mr. Leon Gerofsky argued the cause for respondent (Mr. T. Girard Wharton, County Prosecutor).

Opinion:
Pee Curiam.
The Somerset County Court dismissed the appeal on the ground that an appeal from a conviction for violation of a municipal health ordinance was not comprehended within Rule 2:11. On the argument, counsel conceded that since the decision in State v. Yaccarino, 3 N. J. 291 (Sup. Ct. 1949), appeal to the County Court is the proper method of review. With this we agree. Accordingly the judgment of the Somerset County Court is reversed and the cause remanded thereto.