Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Josue MONROY, a/k/a Feo, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-04-04
Citations: 517 F. App'x 171
Docket Number: No. 12-8031
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Josue MONROY, a/k/a Feo, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 517
Pages: 171–172

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Josue MONROY, a/k/a Feo, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-8031.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 28, 2013.
Decided: April 4, 2013.
Josué Monroy, Appellant Pro Se. George Jarrod Hazel, Arun G. Rao, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Josué Monroy appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Monroy, No. 8:10-cr-00237-AW-1 (DMd. Nov. 1, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.