Case Name: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. QUINCY H. LUCARELLO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1975-12-03
Citations: 69 N.J. 31
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. QUINCY H. LUCARELLO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 69
Pages: 31–31

Head Matter:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. QUINCY H. LUCARELLO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Argued November 3, 1975
Decided December 3, 1975.
Mr. Thomas P. Ford, Jr., argued the cause pro se.
Mr. R. Benjamin Cohen, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Mr. Anthony J. Fusco, Mr. Harry Robinson, III and Mr. Stephen Rosenfeld, Assistant Prosecutors, of counsel; Mr. Joseph P. Lordi, Essex County Prosecutor, attorney).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons set forth in its majority opinion reported at 135 N. J. Super. 347 (1975).
For affirmance—Chief Justice Hughes, Justices Mountain, Sullivan, Pashman, Clifford and Schbeiber and Judge Conford—7.
For reversal—None.