Case Name: David McCULLA, et ux., Petitioner, v. Brian C. RELL, D.P.M., et al., Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2014-05-29
Citations: 140 So. 3d 538
Docket Number: No. SC12-2598
Parties: David McCULLA, et ux., Petitioner, v. Brian C. RELL, D.P.M., et al., Respondent.
Judges: POLSTON, C.J., and LEWIS, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 140
Pages: 538–538

Head Matter:
David McCULLA, et ux., Petitioner, v. Brian C. RELL, D.P.M., et al., Respondent.
No. SC12-2598.
Supreme Court of Florida.
May 29, 2014.
Louis Thaler, Coral Gables, FL, for Petitioners.
Ross L. Fogleman, III of Dickinson & Gibbons, P.A., Sarasota, FL; Mark Hicks, Dinah Stein, and Michael S. Hirschkowitz of Hicks, Porter, Ebenfeld & Stein, P.A., Miami, FL, for Respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted review of the Second District Court of Appeal's decision in Rell v. McCulla, 101 So.3d 878 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we have determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss this review proceeding.
It is so ordered.
POLSTON, C.J., and LEWIS, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.
PARIENTE and QUINCE, JJ., dissent.