Case Name: Christopher MORTIMER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1986-02-18
Citations: 490 So. 2d 93
Docket Number: No. 85-504
Parties: Christopher MORTIMER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARK-DULL and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 490
Pages: 93–94

Head Matter:
Christopher MORTIMER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 85-504.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 18, 1986.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Eric Wm. Hendon, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Renee Ruska Pelzman and Nancy Wear, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARK-DULL and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We hold that notations on a guidelines sentencing score sheet will not suffice as a written order stating reasons to enhance a sentence. State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985), Reichman v. State, 473 So.2d 1324 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Rule 3.701(d)(11) Fla.R.Crim.P. Therefore the sentence under review is reversed and the matter is returned to the trial court for resentencing.
Reversed and remanded.