Case Name: WILLIAM RISHEBARGER, Appellant, v. STOCKWELL-KLING CORPORATION (a Corporation), Respondent
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1932-12-14
Citations: 128 Cal. App. 779
Docket Number: Civ. No. 8664
Parties: WILLIAM RISHEBARGER, Appellant, v. STOCKWELL-KLING CORPORATION (a Corporation), Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports
Volume: 128
Pages: 779–779

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 8664.
Second Appellate District, Division Two.
December 14, 1932.]
WILLIAM RISHEBARGER, Appellant, v. STOCKWELL-KLING CORPORATION (a Corporation), Respondent.
J. Marion Wright for Appellant.
Rohe & Weikert for Respondent.

Opinion:
THOMPSON (IRA F.), J.
The facts in this case and the questions involved are identical with those in the case of Iske v. Stoclcwell-Kling Corp., ante, p. 192 [17 Pac. (2d) 203], this day filed, and for the reasons therein stated the appeal in this case is dismissed.
Works, P. J., and Stephens, J., pro tem., concurred.
A petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on February 9, 1933.