Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Libia Zulema MARQUEZ-LERMA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-07-23
Citations: 389 F. App'x 651
Docket Number: No. 07-30120
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Libia Zulema MARQUEZ-LERMA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 389
Pages: 651–652

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Libia Zulema MARQUEZ-LERMA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-30120.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 29, 2010.
Filed July 23, 2010.
James E. Seykora, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Billings, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Palmer A. Hoovestal, Esq., Helena, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Libia Zulema Marquez-Lerma appeals from the 121-month sentence imposed upon remand for resentencing. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Marquez-Lerma's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.