Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Germain GOYCOOLEA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-09-20
Citations: 46 F. App'x 576
Docket Number: No. 02-50074; D.C. No. CR-01-02172-JNK
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Germain GOYCOOLEA, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 46
Pages: 576–577

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Germain GOYCOOLEA, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 02-50074.
D.C. No. CR-01-02172-JNK.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 9, 2002.
Decided Sept. 20, 2002.
Before HUG, O’SCANNLAIN and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Germain Goycoolea appeals his conviction by guilty plea and the 24-month sentence imposed for conspiracy to distribute marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 and 841(a)(1). Goycoolea's contention that the indictment should be dismissed because the federal drug statutes are unconstitutional under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000) is foreclosed by United States v. Buckland, 277 F.3d 1173, 1177 (9th Cir. 2002) (en banc). His contention that the indictment should be dismissed because it did not allege mens rea as to drug type and quantity is foreclosed by United States v. Carranza, 289 F.3d 634, 644 (9th Cir .2002).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.