Case Name: Margaret REGISTER, Respondent, v. NIAGARA FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY and James W. Cannon Insurance Agency, of whom Niagara Fire Insurance Company is Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jurisdiction: South Carolina
Decision Date: 1966-12-01
Citations: 248 S.C. 504
Docket Number: 18577
Parties: Margaret REGISTER, Respondent, v. NIAGARA FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY and James W. Cannon Insurance Agency, of whom Niagara Fire Insurance Company is Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Carolina Reports
Volume: 248
Pages: 504–505

Head Matter:
18577
Margaret REGISTER, Respondent, v. NIAGARA FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY and James W. Cannon Insurance Agency, of whom Niagara Fire Insurance Company is Appellant.
(151 S. E. (2d) 640)
Messrs. Floyd & Craig, Bill R. Craig and Robert G. Caw-son, Jr., of Hartsville, for Appellant,
Messrs. Thad E. Saleeby and Edward E. Saleeby, of Hartsville, and Isadore E. Lourie, of Columbia, for Respond ent,
December 1, 1966.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
This is an appeal from an order of the lower court denying a motion to strike certain allegations of the complaint as irrelevant, immaterial, and redundant.
The general rule is well settled that an order refusing to strike allegations in a pleading as irrelevant and redundant is not conclusive upon the trial of the case on the merits and is not appealable. Sparks v. D. M. Dew & Sons, Inc., 230 S. C. 507, 96 S. E. (2d) 488; Winchester v. United Insurance Co., 231 S. C. 288, 98 S. E. (2d) 530; Blackmon v. United Insurance Co., 233 S. C. 424, 105 S. E. (2d) 521; Tate v. Oxner, 236 S. C. 313, 114 S. E. (2d) 225; Mason v. Kresge, 247 S. C. 144, 146 S. E. (2d) 158. Application of the foregoing rule to the present appeal requires that it be dismissed; and it is so ordered.
Appeal dismissed.