Case Name: Bernard DOLENZ, Trustee, Plaintiff-Appellant v. WTG GAS PROCESSING, L.P.; Vealmoor GP, Inc., Defendants-Cross-Claimants-Appellees United States of America, Cross-Defendant-Appellee J. Baxter Brinkmann, Intervenor Plaintiff-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-12-30
Citations: 359 F. App'x 479
Docket Number: No. 09-50302
Parties: Bernard DOLENZ, Trustee, Plaintiff-Appellant v. WTG GAS PROCESSING, L.P.; Vealmoor GP, Inc., Defendants-Cross-Claimants-Appellees United States of America, Cross-Defendant-Appellee J. Baxter Brinkmann, Intervenor Plaintiff-Appellee.
Judges: Before JOLLY, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 359
Pages: 479–479

Head Matter:
Bernard DOLENZ, Trustee, Plaintiff-Appellant v. WTG GAS PROCESSING, L.P.; Vealmoor GP, Inc., Defendants-Cross-Claimants-Appellees United States of America, Cross-Defendant-Appellee J. Baxter Brinkmann, Intervenor Plaintiff-Appellee.
No. 09-50302
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 30, 2009.
Bernard J. Dolenz, Trustee, Dallas, TX, pro se.
Mitchell L. Weidenbach, Susan B. Biggs, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Cross-Defendant>-Appellee.
Michael T. Morgan, Janet R. Pritchett, Bullock, Scott & Neisig, Midland, TX, for Defendants-Cross-Claimants-Appellees.
Michael Gideon Brown, Lance Vernon Clack, Figari & Davenport, Dallas, TX, for Intervenor Plaintiff-Appellee.
Before JOLLY, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Plaintiff-Appellant Bernard Dolenz, Trustee, proceeding pro se, appeals from the Amended Final Judgment of the district court filed June 30, 2009. Our painstaking review of the extensive record on appeal in this case, and of the facts and law as set forth in the briefs of the parties, satisfies us that the district court's judgment is, in all respects, correct and fully supported by the applicable law, and that the myriad claims and assertions of Plaintiff-Appellant Dolenz are wholly lacking in merit, to the point of frivolousness and approaching sanctionability. Therefore, for essentially the same reasons expressed by the district court, its Amended Final Judgment, and all other rulings and orders of which Plaintiff-Appellant complains, are
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.