Case Name: EDISON FIXTURE COMPANY, INCORPORATED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. DOCTOR B. J. SCHWARTZ, TRADING, ETC., DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1925-02-05
Citations: 3 N.J. Misc. 185
Docket Number: 
Parties: EDISON FIXTURE COMPANY, INCORPORATED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. DOCTOR B. J. SCHWARTZ, TRADING, ETC., DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 3
Pages: 185–185

Head Matter:
EDISON FIXTURE COMPANY, INCORPORATED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. DOCTOR B. J. SCHWARTZ, TRADING, ETC., DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.
Argued October 8, 1924
Decided February 5, 1925.
Before Justices Tejsncjhaed, Musttuen and Lloyd.
For the appellant, Herman B. J. Weckstein.
For the appellee. Thomas P. Gurley.

Opinion:
Pee Cuetam.
Our examination of the record in this case discloses no error justifying a reversal.
We think there was evidence in this case wherefrom payment of the claim in question might lawfully be inferred by the trial judge, as, apparently, it was inferred, and, therefore, the judgment is affirmed, with costs.