Case Name: Fairmount Funding Ltd., Respondent, v. Milly Stefansky et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1997-01-07
Citations: 235 A.D.2d 213
Docket Number: 
Parties: Fairmount Funding Ltd., Respondent, v Milly Stefansky et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 235
Pages: 213–214

Head Matter:
Fairmount Funding Ltd., Respondent, v Milly Stefansky et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.
[652 NYS2d 14]

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered March 5, 1996, which denied defendants-appellants' motion to vacate the default judgment entered against them for lack of jurisdiction, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The motion was properly denied since the process server's affidavits, which indicate that appellants were each served in accordance with CPLR 308 (4), constituted prima facie evidence of proper service, and appellants' bald assertion that they never received process was insufficient to dispute the veracity or content of the affidavits (Manhattan Sav. Bank v Kohen, 231 AD2d 499). We have considered defendants-appellants' remaining contention and find it to be meritless. Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Williams, Tom and Andrias, JJ.