Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David M. SCATES, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-12-04
Citations: 82 F. App'x 78
Docket Number: No. 03-7134
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. David M. SCATES, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 82
Pages: 78–78

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. David M. SCATES, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 03-7134.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 19, 2003.
Decided Dec. 4, 2003.
David M. Scates, Appellant pro se.
Stephen Wiley Miller, Noelle Dalrymple, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
David M. Scates seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis and his motion for criminal contempt. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Scates, No. CR-98-87 (E.D.Va. July 18, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED