Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles G. CANADY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-09-26
Citations: 540 F. App'x 161
Docket Number: No. 13-6666
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles G. CANADY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 540
Pages: 161–162

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles G. CANADY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-6666.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 19, 2013.
Decided: Sept. 26, 2013.
Charles G. Canady, Appellant Pro Se.
Edward D. Gray, Ethan A. Ontjes, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Charles G. Canady appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Canady, No. 7:02-cr-00127-F-2 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 10, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.