Case Name: Murray Reich, Administrator, vs. George Fatool
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1929-06-13
Citations: 109 Conn. 734
Docket Number: 
Parties: Murray Reich, Administrator, vs. George Fatool.
Judges: Wheeler, C. J., Maltbie, Haines, Hinman and- Banks, Js.
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 109
Pages: 734–735

Head Matter:
Murray Reich, Administrator, vs. George Fatool.
Third Judicial District, Bridgeport,
April Term, 1929.
Wheeler, C. J., Maltbie, Haines, Hinman and- Banks, Js.
Argued April 17th
decided June 13th, 1929.
Philip Reich, with whom, on the brief, was Samuel Reich, for the appellant (plaintiff).
Henry C. Wilson, for the appellee (defendant).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
An examination and comparison of the evidence has satisfied us that the trial court was correct in its conclusion that there was no sufficient evidence before the jury from which the plaintiff's freedom from contributory negligence could have been found and that we cannot hold that the ruling setting aside the verdict was erroneous as matter of law.
There is no error.