Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joshua Curtis CLARK, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-01-17
Citations: 674 F. App'x 956
Docket Number: No. 16-11543 Non-Argument Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joshua Curtis CLARK, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MARTIN, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 674
Pages: 956–957

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joshua Curtis CLARK, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-11543 Non-Argument Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Filed (January 17, 2017)
Adam W. Overstreet, Kenyen Ray Brown, Michele Carstens O’Brien, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Mobile, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Joshua Curtis Clark, Memphis, TN, for Defendant-Appellant
Before MARTIN, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
William Hughes, appointed counsel for Joshua Clark in. this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Clark's conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED,