Case Name: John B. WALLIN; Wanda N. Wallin, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Stephen F. BUZZELL; Kimberly B. Buzzell, Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-06-24
Citations: 384 F. App'x 267
Docket Number: No. 10-1154
Parties: John B. WALLIN; Wanda N. Wallin, Plaintiffs—Appellees, v. Stephen F. BUZZELL; Kimberly B. Buzzell, Defendants—Appellants.
Judges: Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 384
Pages: 267–267

Head Matter:
John B. WALLIN; Wanda N. Wallin, Plaintiffs—Appellees, v. Stephen F. BUZZELL; Kimberly B. Buzzell, Defendants—Appellants.
No. 10-1154.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 17, 2010.
Decided: June 24, 2010.
Stephen F. Buzzell, Kimberly B. Buzzell, Appellants Pro Se. William Ashley Neale Burgess, Sands Anderson, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Stephen F. Buzzell and Kimberly B. Buzzell appeal the district court's order dismissing them motion for reconsideration of its remand order for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), (d) (2006). Because the district court's remand to state court of an unlawful detainer proceeding filed under Virginia law was premised on its lack of subject matter jurisdiction, the district court's order is not subject to review. 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d); Things Remembered, Inc. v. Petrarca, 516 U.S. 124, 127-28, 116 S.Ct. 494, 133 L.Ed.2d 461 (1995).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for a lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.