Case Name: In the Matter of the Marriage of O'DAY, Respondent - Cross-Appellant, and O'DAY, Appellant - Cross-Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1989-04-26
Citations: 96 Or. App. 288
Docket Number: CV 87-0752; CA A49659
Parties: In the Matter of the Marriage of O'DAY, Respondent - Cross-Appellant, and O'DAY, Appellant - Cross-Respondent.
Judges: Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Warren and Rossman, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 96
Pages: 288–289

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted March 24,
on appeal, modified; affirmed as modified; affirmed on cross-appeal April 26, 1989
In the Matter of the Marriage of O'DAY, Respondent - Cross-Appellant, and O'DAY, Appellant - Cross-Respondent.
(CV 87-0752; CA A49659)
772 P2d 451
Robert G. Ringo, Corvallis, argued the cause for appellant - cross-respondent. On the brief were Patrick L. Hadlock and Ringo & Stuber, P.C., Corvallis.
Ronald L. Marek, Corvallis, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent - cross-appellant.
Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Warren and Rossman, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Wife appeals a dissolution judgment and challenges the trial court's spousal support award of "$400 per month from April to December, 1988; $300 per month beginning December, 1988, and each year successively $200 and $100 per month ending December, 1991." On de novo review, we conclude that spousal support for 1991 should be $200 per month, and that it should continue at that level, ending in December, 1993.
Husband cross-appeals the property division, and we affirm on the cross-appeal.
On appeal, judgment modified to award wife spousal support of $200 per month for 1991,1992 and 1993, ending in December, 1993; affirmed as modified; affirmed on cross-appeal. Costs to wife on appeal and cross-appeal.