Case Name: Kevin GROGIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-08-21
Citations: 824 So. 2d 984
Docket Number: No. 4D01-5079
Parties: Kevin GROGIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: KLEIN, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 824
Pages: 984–984

Head Matter:
Kevin GROGIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D01-5079.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Aug. 21, 2002.
Kevin Grogin, Raiford, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melynda L. Melear, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Appellant filed a rule 3.850 motion alleging that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to advise him of the sentence he would receive in connection with his open plea. The motion is legally insufficient because appellant has not alleged that he would not have entered the plea had he been properly informed. See Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59, 106 S.Ct. 366, 88 L.Ed.2d 203 (1985); Roldan v. State, 695 So.2d 864, 864 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).
KLEIN, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.