Case Name: Harold Kessler et al., Respondents, v. City of New York, Appellant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. Empire City Subway Co. (Limited), Third-Party Defendant-Respondent and Fourth-Party Plaintiff-Respondent; Tri-Messine Construction Co., Inc., Fourth-Party Defendant-Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1986-03-13
Citations: 118 A.D.2d 446
Docket Number: 
Parties: Harold Kessler et al., Respondents, v City of New York, Appellant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. Empire City Subway Co. (Limited), Third-Party Defendant-Respondent and Fourth-Party Plaintiff-Respondent; Tri-Messine Construction Co., Inc., Fourth-Party Defendant-Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 118
Pages: 446–446

Head Matter:
Harold Kessler et al., Respondents, v City of New York, Appellant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. Empire City Subway Co. (Limited), Third-Party Defendant-Respondent and Fourth-Party Plaintiff-Respondent; Tri-Messine Construction Co., Inc., Fourth-Party Defendant-Respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Reuben Davis, J.), entered on March 29, 1985, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements, and the orders of said court, entered on or about March 8, 1985 and on or about March 13, 1985, respectively, unanimously dismissed, as abandoned, without costs and without disbursements. No opinion. Concur —Sandler, J. P., Ross, Milonas, Rosenberger and Ellerin, JJ.