Case Name: Dr. Pepi SCHAFLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Scott D. FIELD, Esq.; Kenneth Oestreicher, Esq.; Reznick, Fedder & Silverman; Whiteford, Taylor & Preston; Dennis D. Davis, Esq.; Richard J. Spear, Esq.; Goldberg, Stinnet et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-08-01
Citations: 475 F. App'x 27
Docket Number: No. 12-1430
Parties: Dr. Pepi SCHAFLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Scott D. FIELD, Esq.; Kenneth Oestreicher, Esq.; Reznick, Fedder & Silverman; Whiteford, Taylor & Preston; Dennis D. Davis, Esq.; Richard J. Spear, Esq.; Goldberg, Stinnet et al., Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 475
Pages: 27–27

Head Matter:
Dr. Pepi SCHAFLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Scott D. FIELD, Esq.; Kenneth Oestreicher, Esq.; Reznick, Fedder & Silverman; Whiteford, Taylor & Preston; Dennis D. Davis, Esq.; Richard J. Spear, Esq.; Goldberg, Stinnet et al., Defendants—Appellees.
No. 12-1430.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 26, 2012.
Decided: Aug. 1, 2012.
Pepi Schafler, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Pepi Schafler appeals the district court's order dismissing her complaint alleging civil conspiracy. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Schafler v. Field, No. 8:12-cv-00715-PJM, 2012 WL 959396 (D.Md. Mar. 20, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.