Case Name: In the Matter of Coalition to Save Cedar Hill et al., Appellants, v. Planning Board of Incorporated Village of Port Jefferson et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2009-12-01
Citations: 68 A.D.3d 762
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Coalition to Save Cedar Hill et al., Appellants, v Planning Board of Incorporated Village of Port Jefferson et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 68
Pages: 762–764

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Coalition to Save Cedar Hill et al., Appellants, v Planning Board of Incorporated Village of Port Jefferson et al., Respondents.
[888 NYS2d 899]

Opinion:
The petitioners commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Planning Board of the Incorporated Village of Port Jefferson (hereinafter the Planning Board) conditionally approving a certain final subdivision map. Specifically, the petitioners sought a judgment annulling the determination and remitting the matter to the Planning Board with a direction that it undertake certain additional review before making a new determination regarding the final subdivision map.
The Supreme Court rendered a judgment annulling the determination, based on its finding that the Planning Board, in adopting the resolution making the determination, violated a certain provision of the Code of the Village of Port Jefferson (hereinafter the Village Code). The Supreme Court remitted the matter to the Planning Board with a direction, in effect, that it comply with that provision of the Village Code before making a new determination regarding the final subdivision map.
The petitioners appealed from the judgment to the extent that it denied those branches of the petition which were to annul the determination on certain other grounds, including those branches which were to annul the negative declaration issued by the Planning Board pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (ECL art 8), to compel the Planning Board to prepare a draft environmental impact statement in connection with the proposed subdivision, and to compel the Planning Board to recalculate allowable yield for the proposed subdivision. During the pendency of this appeal, and in accordance with the judgment appealed from, the Planning Board adopted a new resolution dated July 24, 2008, conditionally approving the final subdivision map.
Under such circumstances, this appeal has been rendered academic, and must be dismissed (see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707 [1980]). Fisher, J.P., Angiolillo, Eng and Lott, JJ., concur.