Case Name: Donald E. ENO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sally JEWELL; U.S. Department of the Interior; Interior Board of Land Appeals; U.S. Forest Service, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-11-12
Citations: 805 F.3d 1154
Docket Number: No. 13-15166
Parties: Donald E. ENO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sally JEWELL; U.S. Department of the Interior; Interior Board of Land Appeals; U.S. Forest Service, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: M. MARGARET McKEOWN, MARY H. MURGUIA, and MICHELLE T. FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 805
Pages: 1154–1155

Head Matter:
Donald E. ENO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sally JEWELL; U.S. Department of the Interior; Interior Board of Land Appeals; U.S. Forest Service, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 13-15166.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Nov. 12, 2015.
Steven J. Lechner, Mountain States Legal Foundation, Lakewood, CO, Burton James Stanley, I, Esquire, Law Offices of Burton J. Stanley, Sacramento, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Thekla Hansen-Young, Maggie B. Smith, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Edward Alan Olsen, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Sacramento, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before: M. MARGARET McKEOWN, MARY H. MURGUIA, and MICHELLE T. FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
The opinion filed on August 27, 2015, appearing at 798 F.3d 1245, is hereby amended. The petition for rehearing is granted in part and the opinion is amended as follows:
At slip op. page 11 n. 2 [798 F.3d at 1251], change "We observed as much in a prior appeal involving Eno and charges of unauthorized removal of minerals from these lands." to "We observed as much in a prior appeal, involving unauthorized removal of minerals from these lands, to which Eno was not a party."
With this amendment, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc.
The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing- and rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
The petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED. No further petitions for en banc or panel rehearing shall be permitted.