Case Name: John H. Kuder, Respondent, v. Arthur Mary, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1916-01
Citations: 172 A.D. 900
Docket Number: 
Parties: John H. Kuder, Respondent, v. Arthur Mary, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 172
Pages: 900–900

Head Matter:
John H. Kuder, Respondent, v. Arthur Mary, Appellant.
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Term, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 5th day of Rovember, 1915, reversing an order of the Municipal Court granting a motion for a new trial upon newly-discovered evidence and reinstating the judgment originally rendered in favor of plaintiff.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
We think that the moving affidavit was insufficient to establish a case for a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence, and for that reason, without passing upon the question of the necessity of making a case, the determination appealed from should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Clarke, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Scott and Dowling, JJ. Determination affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.