Case Name: Herman Harnick, Respondent, v. Woodrock Amusement Corporation, Appellant, and Ritz Chocolate Co., Inc., Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1928-05
Citations: 224 A.D. 662
Docket Number: Appeal No. 2
Parties: Herman Harnick, Respondent, v. Woodrock Amusement Corporation, Appellant, and Ritz Chocolate Co., Inc., Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 224
Pages: 662–662

Head Matter:
Herman Harnick, Respondent, v. Woodrock Amusement Corporation, Appellant, and Ritz Chocolate Co., Inc., Defendant.
(Appeal No. 2.)

Opinion:
Order denying motion to dismiss complaint reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that the complaint fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, in that the privilege of the plaintiff to vend candies was not an exclusive privilege. Rich, Young and Seudder, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Seeger, J., dissent upon the ground stated in Harnick v. Woodrock Amusement Corporation, Appeal No. 1 [ante, p. 662], decided herewith.