Case Name: STOCKMAN v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1938-10-12
Citations: 120 S.W.2d 267
Docket Number: No. 19962
Parties: STOCKMAN v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 120
Pages: 267–268

Head Matter:
STOCKMAN v. STATE.
No. 19962.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Oct. 12, 1938.
No appearance for appellant.
Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
GRAVES, Justice.
Conviction for the theft of an automobile; punishment, two years in the penitentiary.
The record is before us without bills of exceptions or statement of facts. There appears in the transcript an affidavit filed in the trial court setting up the inability of appellant to pay for a statement of facts or to give security therefor. There is nothing to show that s?dd affidavit was called to the attention of the trial judge. It follows that a reversal of the judgment on the ground that appellant has been deprived of a statement of facts would not be warranted. Fuller v. State, 98 Tex.Cr.R. 132, 264 S.W. 953; Beddingfield v. State, 130 Tex.Cr.R. 235, 93 S.W.2d 738; Kelley v. State, 130 Tex.Cr.R. 22, 91 S.W.2d 343; Moore v. State, 132 Tex.Cr.R. 347, 104 S.W.2d 862.
The judgment is affirmed.