Case Name: Norman W. Kephart, Petitioner v. Commonweatlh of Pennsylvania, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Respondent
Court: Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1983-11-28
Citations: 78 Pa. Commw. 520
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 2183 C.D. 1982
Parties: Norman W. Kephart, Petitioner v. Commonweatlh of Pennsylvania, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Respondent.
Judges: to Judges Craig, Barry and Blatt, sitting as a panel of three.
Reporter: Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court Reports
Volume: 78
Pages: 520–523

Head Matter:
Norman W. Kephart, Petitioner v. Commonweatlh of Pennsylvania, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Respondent.
Submitted on briefs September 15,1983,
to Judges Craig, Barry and Blatt, sitting as a panel of three.
Denise Niedzielski, with her Niles Schore, for petitioner.
Francine Ostrovsky, Associate Counsel, with her Richard L. Cole, Jr., Chief Counsel, for respondent.
November 28, 1983:

Opinion:
Opinion by
Judge Barry,
This is an appeal by Norman W. Kephart (claimant) from the order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) which affirmed the determination of the Office of Employment Security and the referee's decision denying unemployment compensation benefits because claimant had not worked for the requisite eighteen credit weeks during his base year pursuant to Section 4 of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law), Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. §753(g.l). Claimant has appealed the Board's decision, claiming that he had worked the requisite eighteen credit weeks during his base year and that he is entitled to benefits.
In support of his position, claimant calls our attention to Zubritsky Unemployment Compensation Case, 202 Pa. Superior Ct. 347, 195 A.2d 854 (1963) in which a differentiation was made between wages that were actually paid and those which were earned but not yet paid. The Zubritsky Court stated :
Wages are deemed to be paid, even though not reduced to possession by the employe, as of the day on which, amounts definitely assignable to a payroll period are generally paid by the employer. .
Id. at 349, 195 A.2d at 855. Because the Zubritshy Court noted that the legislature differentiated between the word "paid" and "payable" in other sections of the Law claimant is attempting to persuade us that this distinction should be maintained in the instant case. Because "wages" in 43 P.S. §753(x) means "all remuneration, (including the cash value of mediums of payment other than cash), paid by an employer to an individual with respect to his employment . . .", claimant asserts that use of the word "paid" in the above cited definition indicates that wages earned under the Law are deemed earned when paid, not when services are performed. Similarly, "credit week" in 43 P.S. §753(g.l) means "any calendar week in an individual's base year with respect to which he was paid in 'employment as defined in this act, remuneration of not less than fifty dollars ($50.00). Only one credit week can be established with respect to any one calendar week. ' ' Use in this definition of the word "paid" indicates that a'"credit week" must be deemed earned when wages are paid, not when services are performed.
Claimant worked seventeen weeks during the base year as determined by the Board. Because he was not paid for the pay period ending June 27, 1980 until he received his pay check on July 3, 1980, claimant asserts that he had eighteen credit weeks in his base year because he had worked during the week ending June 27. The Board determined, however, that because the calendar week in question fell outside claimant's base year, beginning July 1, 1980, that week cannot be counted as a credit week during the base year in order for claimant to be entitled to benefits. Claimant's position that the credit week should be counted in the week when the remuneration is paid rather than earned ignores the reality that many employers pay workers on a bi-weekly, bi-monthly or monthly basis. In order for claimant's position to prevail, various rules would have to be enacted for each of the various pay periods which an employer might utilize in order to allow the number of credit weeks to be controlled by the frequency of pay periods. Of course, if subtle distinctions are in order, they must be made, but it does not seem likely that the Law should be construed in this fashion. The Board correctly asserts that guidelines under Sections 1921-22 of thé Statutory Construction Act of 1972, 1 Pa. C. S. §1921-22, indicate that both the object to be attained by the statute as well as the consequences of a particular interpretation must be considered. There is a presumption that the legislature did not intend a result that is absurd, impossible of execution or unreasonable. We believe the language establishing a mirnTnum of eighteen credit weeks is "clear and unambiguous." Briglia v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 70 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 159, 452 A.2d 900 (1982). We conclude, therefore, that claimant does not have the requisite eighteen credit weeks during his base year as required by Section 404(c) of the Law, 43 P.S. §804(c).
The decision of the Board denying benefits is affirmed.
Order
And Now, November 28, 1983, the Order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Decision No. B-208735, dated August 11, 1982, is hereby affirmed.