Case Name: DeAngelo COOK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN, MACON SP, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-04-28
Citations: 686 F. App'x 833
Docket Number: No. 16-15311 Non-Argument Calendar
Parties: DeAngelo COOK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN, MACON SP, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before HULL, WILSON and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 686
Pages: 833–833

Head Matter:
DeAngelo COOK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN, MACON SP, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 16-15311 Non-Argument Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
(April 28, 2017)
DeAngelo Cook, Pro Se
Clint Christopher Malcolm, Samuel Scott Olens, Attorney General’s Office, Atlanta, GA, for Respondent-Appellee
Before HULL, WILSON and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
In 2009, De Angelo Cook, a Georgia prisoner, filed a federal habeas corpus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. That petition was dismissed with prejudice as untimely, and Mr. Cook did not appeal.
In 2016, Mr. Cook filed a second habeas corpus petition. The district court dismissed this petition for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction because Mr. Cook had not obtained circuit authorization to file a second or successive petition. Mr. Cook now appeals.
We affirm. Because Mr. Cook did not obtain circuit authorization to file a second or successive habeas petition, the district court did not have jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A), (b) (4); Tompkins v. Secretary, 557 F.3d 1257, 1259 (11th Cir. 2009).
AFFIRMED.