Case Name: Sadye Weinberg, Respondent, v. Town of Hempstead and Others, Defendants, and Walter W. Lowden, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1942-04-20
Citations: 264 A.D. 738
Docket Number: 
Parties: Sadye Weinberg, Respondent, v. Town of Hempstead and Others, Defendants, and Walter W. Lowden, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 264
Pages: 738–738

Head Matter:
Sadye Weinberg, Respondent, v. Town of Hempstead and Others, Defendants, and Walter W. Lowden, Appellant.

Opinion:
Order denying the motion of the appellant to dismiss the complaint, in so far as appealed from, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to appellant to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. The appellant does not benefit from the provisions of section 215 of the Highway Law. The statute makes no reference to actions other than actions against the town. To support the appellant's contention would require us to read into the statute a condition that does not expressly appear and may not be fairly implied. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.