Case Name: IN the INTEREST OF: S.R.F.; Plaintiff. Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. S.N.F. (Father), Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2016-02-02
Citations: 480 S.W.3d 472
Docket Number: WD 78714
Parties: IN the INTEREST OF: S.R.F.; Plaintiff. Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. S.N.F. (Father), Appellant.
Judges: Before Division Three: James Edward Welsh, P.J., Joseph M. Ellis, and Thomas H. Newton, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 480
Pages: 472–473

Head Matter:
IN the INTEREST OF: S.R.F.; Plaintiff. Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. S.N.F. (Father), Appellant.
WD 78714
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
ORDER FILED: February 2, 2016
Marilyn Keller, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Appellant.
Katie Rooney, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Respondent.
Edward Moore, Kansas City, MO, Co-Counsel for Respondent. ■
Anastacia Adamson, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Plaintiff. .
Before Division Three: James Edward Welsh, P.J., Joseph M. Ellis, and Thomas H. Newton, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
Per Curiam:
S.N.F. appeals an order terminating his parental rights to his , minor child, S.R.F., contending that the evidence was neither sufficient to support the statutory termination grounds nor a determination that termination was in the child's best interest. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).