Case Name: MIAMI DADE COUNTY, Florida, Appellant, v. ASSOCIATED AVIATION UNDERWRITERS, et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-12-26
Citations: 840 So. 2d 264
Docket Number: No. 3D01-3523
Parties: MIAMI DADE COUNTY, Florida, Appellant, v. ASSOCIATED AVIATION UNDERWRITERS, et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before JORGENSON, COPE and GODERICH, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 840
Pages: 264–266

Head Matter:
MIAMI DADE COUNTY, Florida, Appellant, v. ASSOCIATED AVIATION UNDERWRITERS, et al., Appellees.
No. 3D01-3523.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 26, 2002.
Rehearing Denied March 26, 2003.
Greenberg Traurig, Elliot H. Scherker, Peter M. Gillon and Mitchell J. Rotbert (Washington, D.C.), and Reginald L. Bouthillier, Jr. (Tallahassee), for appellant.
Steel Hector & Davis, Alvin B. Davis, John T. Butler and Gabriel E. Nieto, Miami; Lord Bissell & Brook, Gary Wester-berg, Don W. Fowler, and Christopher R. Barth (Chicago, Illinois); Siboni Hamer & Buchanan and Michael C. Siboni (Ocala); London Fischer and Julius A. Rousseau, III (New York, New York); and Phelps Dunbar and Jay Russell Sever (New Orleans, Louisiana), for appellees.
Before JORGENSON, COPE and GODERICH, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In the underlying declaratory action, Miami Dade County appeals from final orders denying insurance coverage. After carefully reviewing the record, we find that the policies at issue were unambiguous and that Miami Dade County was not an "additional insured" under some of the policies and that the pollution exclusion precluded coverage under the other policies where the County was listed as an insured. Further, we find that the remaining issues lack merit.
Accordingly, the orders under review are affirmed.