Case Name: Arnold Heerwagen et al., Respondents, v. Charles L. Ritzmann, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Common Pleas
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1895
Citations: 14 Misc. 643
Docket Number: 
Parties: Arnold Heerwagen et al., Respondents, v. Charles L. Ritzmann, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 14
Pages: 643–643

Head Matter:
Arnold Heerwagen et al., Respondents, v. Charles L. Ritzmann, Appellant.
Motion for reargument of appeal.-
_ _ _ Wolf, Kohn & JJllman, for motion.
Albert I. Sire, opposed.

Opinion:
Per Ouriam.
The present motion does not conform to rule 16 of the General Term of this court with regard to motions for reargument.
Counsel, in effect, simply desires to present a more elaborate argument upon the exception which' the General Term deemed fatal to the judgment, and it does not appear that any question decisive of the case has been overlooked.
Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
Present: Daly, Oh. J., BisonorF and Pbyob, JJ.
Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.