Case Name: Phillip BUTLER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2006-10-11
Citations: 941 So. 2d 430
Docket Number: No. 3D06-1642
Parties: Phillip BUTLER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before FLETCHER and SHEPHERD, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 941
Pages: 430–430

Head Matter:
Phillip BUTLER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D06-1642.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 11, 2006.
Rehearing Denied Nov. 14, 2006.
Phillip Butler, in proper person.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, for appellee.
Before FLETCHER and SHEPHERD, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Sheffield v. State, 903 So.2d 1009, 1011 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)(" 'a trial court must either state its rationale in its decision or attach those specific parts of the record that refute each claim presented in the motion' " (quoting Anderson v. State, 627 So.2d 1170, 1171 (Fla.1993)))(emphasis added).