Case Name: George Milton BRITT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. T.V. FOWLER, Police Officer; Joseph D. Jenkins, Officer; Police Department Second Precinct; Vera J. Sanders, Commonwealth; K. Orsini, Commonwealth, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-12-29
Citations: 117 F. App'x 298
Docket Number: No. 04-7203
Parties: George Milton BRITT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. T.V. FOWLER, Police Officer; Joseph D. Jenkins, Officer; Police Department Second Precinct; Vera J. Sanders, Commonwealth; K. Orsini, Commonwealth, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 117
Pages: 298–299

Head Matter:
George Milton BRITT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. T.V. FOWLER, Police Officer; Joseph D. Jenkins, Officer; Police Department Second Precinct; Vera J. Sanders, Commonwealth; K. Orsini, Commonwealth, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 04-7203.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 13, 2004.
Decided Dec. 29, 2004.
George Milton Britt, Appellant pro se.
Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed as modified by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
George Milton Britt appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We note, however, that the district court should have dismissed the action without prejudice. See Napier v. Preslicka, 314 F.3d 528, 534 n. 3 (11th Cir.2002). Accordingly, we affirm as modified to reflect dismissal without prejudice See Britt v. Fowler, No. CA-04-679 (E.D.Va. July 13, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED