Case Name: THE A. H. KUHLEMANN COMPANY vs. CORKRAN, HILL & COMPANY, INC., and THE BALTIMORE BUTTERINE COMPANY
Court: Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jurisdiction: Maryland
Decision Date: 1920-06-17
Citations: 136 Md. 539
Docket Number: 
Parties: THE A. H. KUHLEMANN COMPANY vs. CORKRAN, HILL & COMPANY, INC., and THE BALTIMORE BUTTERINE COMPANY.
Judges: The cause was, argued, together with that next preceding, before Boyd, C. J., Briscoe, Thomas, Pattison, IIrner, Stockbridge, Adkins and Oeeutt, JJ.
Reporter: Maryland Reports
Volume: 136
Pages: 539–539

Head Matter:
THE A. H. KUHLEMANN COMPANY vs. CORKRAN, HILL & COMPANY, INC., and THE BALTIMORE BUTTERINE COMPANY.
Decided June 17th, 1920.
Appeal from the Circuit Court No. 2 for Baltimore City (Dawkins, J.).
The cause was, argued, together with that next preceding, before Boyd, C. J., Briscoe, Thomas, Pattison, IIrner, Stockbridge, Adkins and Oeeutt, JJ.
George A. Finch, for the appellant.
Fdgar Adlan Foe, with whom were Bartlett, Foe & Glaggeti on the brief, for the appellees.

Opinion:
Pattison, J.,
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The bill in. this ease was filed by the appellant asking for an injunction, restraining the appellee from using the trader mark "Orange Brand" upon its cartons, or otherwise, in the purchase, manufacture or sale of oleomargarine, and for other relief which we deem unnecessary here to state.
This, bill was filed after the Court had dismissed thei bill in Oorkran, Hill & Co. vs,. The A. H. Kuhlemann Co. (No,. 22), decided at this term, in which The A. H. Kuhlemann Co. asked that Corkran, Hill & Co. be restrained in the use of said trade-mark for like purposes.
The Court below dismissed the bill in that case, but upon an appeal to this Court, the order dismissing the bill was reversed and the case remanded that an injunction be passed as prayed.
Eor the reasons stated by this Court in its opinion in that case (Oorkran, Hill & Co. vsi The A. H. Kuhlemann Co.) for reversing the decree of the lower Court, the order of the Court below in denying the injunction in this, case will be affirmed.
Decree affirmed, with costs to the appellee.