Case Name: In the Interest of A.H., a child
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-02-27
Citations: 574 So. 2d 1229
Docket Number: No. 90-1330
Parties: In the Interest of A.H., a child.
Judges: DOWNEY, STONE and POLEN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 574
Pages: 1229–1229

Head Matter:
In the Interest of A.H., a child.
No. 90-1330.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb. 27, 1991.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, Joseph S. Shook and Nancy Perez, Asst. Public Defenders, West Palm Beach, for appellant A.H.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Miles Ferris, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee State of Fla.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm as to all points raised by the appellant; however, we remand to the lower court with directions to reconcile the inconsistency between the written restitution order and the oral pronouncement of restitution. A.R. v. State, 475 So.2d 308 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).
DOWNEY, STONE and POLEN, JJ., concur.