Case Name: BAKER v. STATE
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1935-04-04
Citations: 19 Ohio Law Abs. 126
Docket Number: No 2529
Parties: BAKER v STATE
Judges: PUNK, PJ, STEVENS and WASHBURN, JJ, concur in judgment.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 19
Pages: 126–128

Head Matter:
BAKER v STATE
Ohio Appeals, 9th Dist, Summit Co
No 2529.
Decided April 4, 1935
Donald Gottwald, Akron, for plaintiff in error.
Herman E. Werner, Prosecuting Atty., Akron, and. J. W. Harrah, Asst. Pros. Atty., Akron, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
OPINION
PER CURIAM
The principal error complained of is that the judgment of the trial court is manifestly against the weight of the evidence.
To reverse upon that ground requires the concurrence of all of the judges of this court. We have carefully read and considered at length the record, and have been mindful of the law which requires proof of crime beyond a reasonable doubt, but we are unable to reach the unanimous conclusion that this conviction should be reversed upon the weight of the evidence.
We find no prejudicial error in any of the other claims made.
Judgment affirmed.