Case Name: Charles A. GULDEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Thomas E. WHITE, Secretary, United States Department of the Army, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-09-24
Citations: 46 F. App'x 214
Docket Number: No. 02-1675
Parties: Charles A. GULDEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Thomas E. WHITE, Secretary, United States Department of the Army, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 46
Pages: 214–215

Head Matter:
Charles A. GULDEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Thomas E. WHITE, Secretary, United States Department of the Army, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 02-1675.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 9, 2002.
Decided Sept. 24, 2002.
Charles A. Gulden, Appellant Pro Se. Francis Patrick King, Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Charles A. Gulden appeals the district court's order granting the Defendant's motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Gulden v. White, No. CA-01-1519 (E.D.Va. May 7, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.