Case Name: Henry A. COLEMAN, Delma A. Coleman, John Coleman, Ada Mae Coleman, a minor, John Coleman, a minor, and Larry Joe Coleman, a minor, Henry A. Coleman, being the next friend and father of all minors, Appellants (Plaintiffs below), v. Dean ALEXANDER and the Otto Lumber Company, Inc., a Wyoming corporation, Appellees (Defendants below)
Court: Supreme Court of Wyoming
Jurisdiction: Wyoming
Decision Date: 1963-08-20
Citations: 384 P.2d 321
Docket Number: No. 3086
Parties: Henry A. COLEMAN, Delma A. Coleman, John Coleman, Ada Mae Coleman, a minor, John Coleman, a minor, and Larry Joe Coleman, a minor, Henry A. Coleman, being the next friend and father of all minors, Appellants (Plaintiffs below), v. Dean ALEXANDER and the Otto Lumber Company, Inc., a Wyoming corporation, Appellees (Defendants below).
Judges: Before PARKER, C. J., and HARNS-BERGER, GRAY, and McINTYRE, JJ.
Reporter: Pacific Reporter 2d
Volume: 384
Pages: 321–321

Head Matter:
Henry A. COLEMAN, Delma A. Coleman, John Coleman, Ada Mae Coleman, a minor, John Coleman, a minor, and Larry Joe Coleman, a minor, Henry A. Coleman, being the next friend and father of all minors, Appellants (Plaintiffs below), v. Dean ALEXANDER and the Otto Lumber Company, Inc., a Wyoming corporation, Appellees (Defendants below).
No. 3086.
Supreme Court of Wyoming.
Aug. 20, 1963.
Robert W. Costin, of Davis & Costin, Laramie, for appellant.
John F. Sullivan, Laramie, for appellees.
Before PARKER, C. J., and HARNS-BERGER, GRAY, and McINTYRE, JJ.

Opinion:
Mr. Justice HARNSBERGER
delivered the opinion of the court.
This case comes to us on appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiffs. The action is the outgrowth of a collision on a winding mountain road between a truck and an automobile in which the plaintiffs were riding. Appellants claim the judgment was contrary to the evidence.
A careful examination of the evidence favorable to the defendants convinces that it is substantial and sufficient to support the judgment rendered. The judgment of the lower court is affirmed.
Affirmed.