Case Name: CX REINSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, formerly known as CNA Reinsurance Company Limited, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Brayon J. LOYAL, Defendant-Appellant, and Stewart J. Levitas, Defendant; CX Reinsurance Company Limited, formerly known as CNA Reinsurance Company Limited, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Brayon J. Loyal, Defendant-Appellee, and Stewart J. Levitas, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-06-06
Citations: 691 F. App'x 130
Docket Number: No. 16-2180, No. 16-2228
Parties: CX REINSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, formerly known as CNA Reinsurance Company Limited, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Brayon J. LOYAL, Defendant-Appellant, and Stewart J. Levitas, Defendant. CX Reinsurance Company Limited, formerly known as CNA Reinsurance Company Limited, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Brayon J. Loyal, Defendant-Appellee, and Stewart J. Levitas, Defendant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 691
Pages: 130–131

Head Matter:
CX REINSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, formerly known as CNA Reinsurance Company Limited, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Brayon J. LOYAL, Defendant-Appellant, and Stewart J. Levitas, Defendant. CX Reinsurance Company Limited, formerly known as CNA Reinsurance Company Limited, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Brayon J. Loyal, Defendant-Appellee, and Stewart J. Levitas, Defendant.
No. 16-2180, No. 16-2228
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 31, 2017
Decided: June 6, 2017
John Amato, IV, GOODMAN, MEAGHER & ENOCH, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant/Cross-Appellee. Stuart M.G. Seraina, Louis P. Malick, KRAMON & GRAHAM, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Brayon J. Loyal appeals the district court's order denying her motion for summary judgment and granting summary judgment in favor of CX Reinsurance Company Ltd. ("CX Reinsurance"). CX Reinsurance cross-appeals from the same order by the district court denying its motion to dismiss the action.
With respect to Loyal's appeal, we have reviewed the parties' briefs and the record and, although we grant Loyal's motion to file the additional materials submitted with her opening brief, we find no reversible error in the portion of the district court's order granting summary judgment to CX Reinsurance. Accordingly, for the reasons stated by the district court, we affirm the district court's order granting summary judgment. Loyal v. CX Reinsurance Co., No. 1:15-cv-02174-JKB (D. Md. Sept. 15, 2016). Because we affirm the district court's grant of summary judgment in CX Reinsurance's favor, we dismiss as moot CX Reinsurance's cross-appeal of the denial of its motion to dismiss. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
No. 16-2180 AFFIRMED
No. 16-2228 DISMISSED