Case Name: Robert V. HARTNETT, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert E. GLIDDEN, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-11-13
Citations: 21 F. App'x 223
Docket Number: No. 01-1116
Parties: Robert V. HARTNETT, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert E. GLIDDEN, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 21
Pages: 223–223

Head Matter:
Robert V. HARTNETT, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert E. GLIDDEN, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 01-1116.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 24, 2001.
Decided Nov. 13, 2001.
Robert V. Hartnett, Jr., pro se. Danny Ray Glover, Jr., Elizabeth City, NC, for appellee.
Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Robert V. Hartnett, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying Hartnett's motion for new trial, sustaining the jury's verdict and damage award. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hartnett v. Glidden, No. CA-99-29-2-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 6, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.