Case Name: Schroeder, Dir., et al. v. The State, ex rel. Pershing; Schroeder, Dir., et al. v. The State, ex rel. Lederhaus; Cowell, Dir., et al. v. The State, ex rel. Sprott. Schroeder, Dir., et al. v. The State, ex rel. Wyre; Schroeder, Dir., et al. v. The State, ex rel. Schick; Schroeder, Dir., et al. v. The State, ex rel. Buser; Schroeder, Dir., et al. v. The State, ex rel. Thomas; Schroeder, Dir., et al. v. The State, ex rel. Doling
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1930-11-19
Citations: 123 Ohio St. 666
Docket Number: Nos. 22314 to 22321
Parties: Schroeder, Dir., et al. v. The State, ex rel. Pershing. Schroeder, Dir., et al. v. The State, ex rel. Lederhaus. Cowell, Dir., et al. v. The State, ex rel. Sprott. Schroeder, Dir., et al. v. The State, ex rel. Wyre. Schroeder, Dir., et al. v. The State, ex rel. Schick. Schroeder, Dir., et al. v. The State, ex rel. Buser. Schroeder, Dir., et al. v. The State, ex rel. Thomas. Schroeder, Dir., et al. v. The State, ex rel. Doling.
Judges: Marshall, C. J., Day and Allen, JJ., concur. Kinkade, J., not participating.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, New Service
Volume: 123
Pages: 666–667

Head Matter:
Schroeder, Dir., et al. v. The State, ex rel. Pershing. Schroeder, Dir., et al. v. The State, ex rel. Lederhaus. Cowell, Dir., et al. v. The State, ex rel. Sprott. Schroeder, Dir., et al. v. The State, ex rel. Wyre. Schroeder, Dir., et al. v. The State, ex rel. Schick. Schroeder, Dir., et al. v. The State, ex rel. Buser. Schroeder, Dir., et al. v. The State, ex rel. Thomas. Schroeder, Dir., et al. v. The State, ex rel. Doling.
(Nos. 22314 to 22321, inclusive
Decided November 19, 1930.)
Mr. Martin 8. Dodd, director of law, and Mr. D. J. O’Rourhe, for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. Wesley 8. TJmrstin, for defendants in error.

Opinion:
It appearing that the Judges of this Court are equally divided in opinion as to the merits of these cases, one of the Judges not participating, and are unable for that reason to agree upon judgments, the entry of this fact constitutes an affirmance of the judgments of the Court of Appeals.
Judgments affirmed.
Marshall, C. J., Day and Allen, JJ., concur. Kinkade, J., not participating.