Case Name: Renate Werner v. Conservation Commission of the Town of Easton
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1990-01-10
Citations: 20 Conn. App. 819
Docket Number: 7903
Parties: Renate Werner v. Conservation Commission of the Town of Easton
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Appellate Reports
Volume: 20
Pages: 819–820

Head Matter:
Renate Werner v. Conservation Commission of the Town of Easton
(7903)
Spallone, Daly and Foti, Js.
Argued December 13, 1989
decision released January 10, 1990
Andrew D. Cretella, for the appellant (plaintiff).
Ronald D. Williams, for the appellee (defendant).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his appeal from a decision of the defendant, the conservation commission of the town of Easton. The defendant had denied the plaintiff's application for a declaratory ruling to establish a three acre farm pond for the operation of a Christmas tree farm on his premises. The plaintiff claims that the court erred in concluding (1) that he was not entitled to establish a three acre farm pond as a matter of right pursuant to General Statutes § 22a-40 (a) (1), as amended by Public Acts 1987, No. 87-538, and § 3.1 of the regulations of the conservation commission of the town of Easton, (2) that the defendant's decision was supported by substantial evidence in the record, and (3) that the hearing afforded to the plaintiff was fundamentally fair. We have fully considered the plaintiff's claims, the defendant's responses thereto, the entire record of this case and the trial court's thoughtful memorandum of decision. On the basis of that review, we conclude that the plaintiff's claims of error are without merit.
There is no error.