Case Name: Harriston M. BECK, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2013-02-13
Citations: 391 S.W.3d 913
Docket Number: No. ED 98290
Parties: Harriston M. BECK, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., MARY K. HOFF and Lisa Van Amburg, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 391
Pages: 913–914

Head Matter:
Harriston M. BECK, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 98290.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Feb. 13, 2013.
Timothy Forneris, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Todd T. Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., MARY K. HOFF and Lisa Van Amburg, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Harriston M. Beck, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have - no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their infor mation only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).