Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clinton Bernard FRAZIER-EL, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-09-11
Citations: 46 F. App'x 168
Docket Number: No. 02-7025
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clinton Bernard FRAZIER-EL, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 46
Pages: 168–169

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clinton Bernard FRAZIER-EL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-7025.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 5, 2002.
Decided Sept. 11, 2002.
Clinton Bernard Frazier-El, Appellant Pro Se. Tarra R. DeShields-Minnis, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Clinton Bernard Frazier-El seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and conclude on the reasoning of the district court that Frazier-El has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. United States v. Frazier-El, Nos. CR-96-469-WMN; CA-01-3412-HNM (D. Md. June 17, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.