Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Robert Christopher RACKSTRAW, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-12-16
Citations: 587 F. App'x 844
Docket Number: No. 14-10199
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Robert Christopher RACKSTRAW, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 587
Pages: 844–845

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Robert Christopher RACKSTRAW, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 14-10199
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 16, 2014.
James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Dallas, TX, John Preston Bradford, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Fort Worth, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Robert Christopher Rackstraw, Pollock, LA, pro se.
Before KING, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Robert Christopher Rack-straw has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Rackstraw has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected there in. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.