Case Name: Edward Horowitz, Respondent, v. Kushner & Pines, Inc., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1943-11-23
Citations: 181 Misc. 10
Docket Number: 
Parties: Edward Horowitz, Respondent, v. Kushner & Pines, Inc., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 181
Pages: 10–11

Head Matter:
Edward Horowitz, Respondent, v. Kushner & Pines, Inc., Appellant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
November 23, 1943.
Herman Mendes for appellant.
Samuel Sumner Goldberg for repondent.

Opinion:
Memorandum
Per Curiam.
Plaintiff's error in practice by failing to make a separate demand for jury trial was not curable by the nunc pro tune order appealed from.
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.
Hammer, Schmuck and Hecht, JJ., concur.