Case Name: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. William R. OMASTA, Jr., Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1977-02-03
Citations: 342 So. 2d 505
Docket Number: No. 48949
Parties: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. William R. OMASTA, Jr., Respondent.
Judges: OVERTON, C. J., and ADKINS, ENGLAND and KARL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 342
Pages: 505–505

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. William R. OMASTA, Jr., Respondent.
No. 48949.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Feb. 3, 1977.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and William I. Munsey, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.
Sondra Goldenfarb of Joseph G. Donahey, Jr., Clearwater, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ. Upon further consideration of the cause, we conclude that no direct conflict of decisions exists as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.
It is so ordered.
OVERTON, C. J., and ADKINS, ENGLAND and KARL, JJ., concur.
BOYD, SUNDBERG and HATCHETT, JJ., dissent.