Case Name: Andrew F. Reeck, as Guardian ad Litem of Dorothy Ruth Reeck, an Infant under the Age of Fourteen Years, Appellant, v. Alexander Royfe and Another, a Copartnership, Doing Business under the Name of Royfe & Swimmer, Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1925-04-22
Citations: 125 Misc. 825
Docket Number: 
Parties: Andrew F. Reeck, as Guardian ad Litem of Dorothy Ruth Reeck, an Infant under the Age of Fourteen Years, Appellant, v. Alexander Royfe and Another, a Copartnership, Doing Business under the Name of Royfe & Swimmer, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 125
Pages: 825–825

Head Matter:
Andrew F. Reeck, as Guardian ad Litem of Dorothy Ruth Reeck, an Infant under the Age of Fourteen Years, Appellant, v. Alexander Royfe and Another, a Copartnership, Doing Business under the Name of Royfe & Swimmer, Respondents.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
April 22, 1925.
Nathaniel H. Kramer, for the appellant.
No appearance for the respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
Appeal dismissed, but as respondents neither appeared nor submitted a brief, no costs are allowed.
The order is not appealable. The fact that leave to appeal was granted by the court below does not give this court jurisdiction. It can obtain jurisdiction through the granting of leave to appeal only in the certain cases that are specified. (See Mun. Ct. Code, § 154, subd. 7, since amd. by Laws of 1925, chap. 637.) The motion should have been granted. (See Wilson v. Simpson, 84 N. Y. 674; Drake v. Hodgson, 119 Misc. 288; affd., 203 App. Div. 856.)
Present: Cfopsey, Lazansey and MacCrate, JJ.