Case Name: Arvilla M. NICHOLSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CON-WAY TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC., a Delaware Corporation, fka Con-Way Western Express, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-11-27
Citations: 51 F. App'x 750
Docket Number: No. 01-35779; D.C. No. CV-99-00018-EJL
Parties: Arvilla M. NICHOLSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CON-WAY TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC., a Delaware Corporation, fka Con-Way Western Express, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 51
Pages: 750–751

Head Matter:
Arvilla M. NICHOLSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CON-WAY TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC., a Delaware Corporation, fka Con-Way Western Express, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 01-35779.
D.C. No. CV-99-00018-EJL.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 18, 2002.
Decided Nov. 27, 2002.
Before REINHARDT, RYMER, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, Con-Way's request for oral argument is denied.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Arvilla M. Nicholson appeals pro se the jury verdict in favor of her former employer in her employment discrimination action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We dismiss the appeal.
We are unable to review Nicholson's contentions that defense counsel introduced irrelevant and prejudicial evidence during trial, and made prejudicial remarks during closing argument because Nicholson has failed to provide a trial transcript. See Fed. R.App. P. 10(b)(2); see also Syncom Capital Corp. v. Wade, 924 F.2d 167, 169 (9th Cir.1991) (per curiam) (holding that the court may dismiss appeal or refuse to consider appellant's contentions when appellant fails to supply a trial transcript).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.