Case Name: The VARIABLE ANNUITY LIFE INSURANCE CO., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert L. CLARK, Comptroller of the Currency, et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1994-01-13
Citations: 13 F.3d 833
Docket Number: No. 92-2010
Parties: The VARIABLE ANNUITY LIFE INSURANCE CO., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert L. CLARK, Comptroller of the Currency, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before GOLDBERG, JOLLY and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 13
Pages: 833–838

Head Matter:
The VARIABLE ANNUITY LIFE INSURANCE CO., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert L. CLARK, Comptroller of the Currency, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 92-2010.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Jan. 13, 1994.
David Overlock Stewart, Raymond C. Ort-man, Ropes & Gray, Washington, DC, for plaintiff-appellant.
Ellen K. Dolíase, Kansas City, MO, pro hac vice, amicus curiae in support of appellant.
Jacob M. Lewis, Mark B. Stern, U.S. Dept, of Justice, Civ. Div., Washington, DC, for Clark, Office of Comp. & U.S.
Steven S. Rosenthal, Robert M. Kurucza, Morrison & Foerster, Washington, DC, for NCNB BK. & NCNB Sec.
Jonathan Sallet, Ann M. Kappler, Jenner & Block, Washington, DC, amicus curiae.
Michael F. Crotty, Washington, DC, ami-cus curiae (AMA).
Donn C. Meindertsma, David W. Roderer, Eric L. Hirschhorn, Winston & Strawn, Washington, DC, amicus curiae American Bankers Assn., Assn, of Banks in Ins., Bankers Roundtable, Consumer Bankers Assn., Independent Bankers Assn, of America, Independent Bankers Assn, of Texas, Louisiana Bankers Assn., Mississippi Bankers Assn., Savings & Community Bankers of America, and Texas Bankers Assn.
Theodore Edelman, John L. Warden, Sullivan & Cromwell, New York City, amicus curiae NY Clearing House Assn.
Before GOLDBERG, JOLLY and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
Judges King, Garwood, Higginbotham, Jones, Duhé, and DeMoss did not participate in the consideration of the suggestions for rehearing en banc.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Petitions for Rehearing are DENIED and the Court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the Court and a majority of the Circuit Judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor of it, (Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and Local Rule 35) the Suggestions for Rehearing En Banc are also DENIED.