Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher Eastman BROWN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-07-23
Citations: 338 F. App'x 697
Docket Number: No. 07-30372
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher Eastman BROWN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 338
Pages: 697–698

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher Eastman BROWN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-30372.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 14, 2009.
Filed July 23, 2009.
Jennifer Jane Martin, Assistant U.S., Amy Potter, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Portland, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Christopher Eastman Brown, Naheotta, WA, pro se.
Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Christopher Eastman Brown, a former federal prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court's order denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, see United States v. Riedl, 496 F.3d 1003, 1005 (9th Cir.2007), and we affirm.
Brown contends that his conviction for violating 21 U.S.C. § 841(a) is invalid because the Attorney General has not promulgated any regulations to implement the statute. This contention lacks merit. See generally United States v. Kwan, 407 F.3d 1005, 1011 (9th Cir.2005).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.