Case Name: MAXWELL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NESSCAP, INC. and Nesscap Co., Ltd., Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-04-23
Citations: 331 F. App'x 745
Docket Number: No. 2007-1324
Parties: MAXWELL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NESSCAP, INC. and Nesscap Co., Ltd., Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 331
Pages: 745–746

Head Matter:
MAXWELL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NESSCAP, INC. and Nesscap Co., Ltd., Defendants-Appellants.
No. 2007-1324.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
April 23, 2009.
David C. Doyle, Brian M. Kramer, Eric M. Acker, Morrison & Foerster, LLP, San Diego, CA, Cynthia Lopez Beverage, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
George W. Neuner, Brian M. Gaff, Edwards Angelí Palmer & Dodge, LLP, Boston, MA, for Defendants-Appellants.

Opinion:
ON MOTION
ORDER
The court having received no response to its March 19, 2009 order,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
The motion to vacate the preliminary injunction is denied and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California so that the district court may consider whether to vacate the preliminary injunction, due to settlement.