Case Name: Cornelius WILLIAMS, Jr., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. ST. LOUIS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-12-05
Citations: 911 S.W.2d 669
Docket Number: No. 66074
Parties: Cornelius WILLIAMS, Jr., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. ST. LOUIS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANE, C.J., SIMON, J. and WILLIAM E. TURNAGE, Sr. J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 911
Pages: 669–670

Head Matter:
Cornelius WILLIAMS, Jr., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. ST. LOUIS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, Defendant/Respondent.
No. 66074.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Dec. 5, 1995.
Cornelius Williams, Jr., Jefferson City, pro se.
Michael E. Hughes, Associate City Counselor, Tyrone A. Taborn, Michael Garvin, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before CRANE, C.J., SIMON, J. and WILLIAM E. TURNAGE, Sr. J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff appeals from the dismissal of his medical malpractice suit. We affirm.
The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).