Case Name: Rolando RAMOS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-06-21
Citations: 779 So. 2d 384
Docket Number: No. 2D97-2347
Parties: Rolando RAMOS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: PARKER, A.C.J., and BLUE and CASANUEVA, JJ, Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 779
Pages: 384–385

Head Matter:
Rolando RAMOS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D97-2347.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
June 21, 2000.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Kevin Briggs, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Robert A Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Susan D. Dunlevy, Tampa, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant's sole contention is that the 1995 sentencing guidelines, under which he was sentenced for crimes occurring on March 11, 1997, are unconstitutional because the legislature's enactment of chapter 95-184, Laws of Florida, violated the single-subject provision of Article III, Section 6, of the Florida Constitution. We agree and remand for reconsideration of sentence in accordance with Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000), and our recent opinion in Smith v. State, 761 So.2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).
PARKER, A.C.J., and BLUE and CASANUEVA, JJ, Concur.