Case Name: Craig B. DANIELS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2012-11-08
Citations: 103 So. 3d 133
Docket Number: No. SC11-1646
Parties: Craig B. DANIELS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: POLSTON, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 103
Pages: 133–133

Head Matter:
Craig B. DANIELS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. SC11-1646.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Nov. 8, 2012.
Carlos Fernando Gonzalez of Diaz, Reus & Targ, LLP, Miami, FL, for Petitioner.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Criminal Appeals Division, and Charles Richey McCoy, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, FL, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted review of the decision in Daniels v. State, 66 So.3d 328 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss this review proceeding.
It is so ordered.
POLSTON, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.