Case Name: In re RONALD A. KATZ TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, L.P.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-11-07
Citations: 540 F. App'x 995
Docket Number: No. 2013-1139
Parties: In re RONALD A. KATZ TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, L.P.
Judges: WALLACH, LINN, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 540
Pages: 995–996

Head Matter:
In re RONALD A. KATZ TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, L.P.
No. 2013-1139.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Nov. 7, 2013.
Frank V. Pietrantonio, Cooley LLP, of Reston, Virginia, argued for appellant. With him on the brief were Jonathan G. Graves, of Reston, Virginia, and Lori R. Mason and Lowell D. Mead of Palo Alto, California.
Stacy B. Margolies, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia argued for ap-pellee. Of counsel on the brief were Nathan K. Kelley, Deputy Solicitor, and Thomas W. Krause, Associate Solicitor.
WALLACH, LINN, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and Adjudged:
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.