Case Name: Charles BARKLEY et al. v. Milton SOMMERS et al.
Court: Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jurisdiction: Maryland
Decision Date: 1994-03-04
Citations: 336 Md. 124
Docket Number: No. 139
Parties: Charles BARKLEY et al. v. Milton SOMMERS et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Maryland Reports
Volume: 336
Pages: 124–125

Head Matter:
647 A.2d 106
Charles BARKLEY et al. v. Milton SOMMERS et al.
No. 139,
Sept. Term, 1993.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
March 4, 1994.
Saul E. Kerpelman, Baltimore, for appellant.
John F. X. Costello (McCarthy, Bacon & Costello, on brief), Lanham; Irwin E. Weiss, Baltimore, for Maker and Gillison T/A Fidelity Associates.
Submitted before MURPHY, C.J., and ELDRIDGE, RODOWSKY, CHASANOW, KARWACKI, BELL and RAKER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
The Court having considered the motion to dismiss writ of certiorari and the answer filed thereto in the above captioned case, it is this 4th day of March, 1994,
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the motion be, and it is hereby, granted and the writ of certiorari is dismissed with costs, the petition having been improvidently granted, and it is further
ORDERED, that the case be remanded to the Court of Special Appeals for a determination of the merits of the appeal.