Case Name: Frederick J. NERONI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HINMAN, HOWARD & KATTELL, LLP, Levene, Gouldin & Thompson, LLP, Margaret Fowler, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-06-25
Citations: 607 F. App'x 113
Docket Number: No. 14-3359-cv
Parties: Frederick J. NERONI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HINMAN, HOWARD & KATTELL, LLP, Levene, Gouldin & Thompson, LLP, Margaret Fowler, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: PRESENT: DENNIS JACOBS, GUIDO CALABRESI and GERARD E. LYNCH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 607
Pages: 113–114

Head Matter:
Frederick J. NERONI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HINMAN, HOWARD & KATTELL, LLP, Levene, Gouldin & Thompson, LLP, Margaret Fowler, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 14-3359-cv.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
June 25, 2015.
Frederick J. Neroni, pro se, Delhi, NY, for Appellant.
James S. Gleason, Hinman, Howard & Kattell, LLP, Binghamton, NY, Robert A. Barrer, Barclay Damon, LLP, Syracuse, NY, for Appellees.
PRESENT: DENNIS JACOBS, GUIDO CALABRESI and GERARD E. LYNCH, Circuit Judges.
The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to amend the official caption in this case to conform with the caption above.

Opinion:
SUMMARY ORDER
Frederick J. Neroni appeals from the order of the United .States District Court for the Northern District .of New York (Sharpe, /.), granting defendants' motions for attorneys' fees and costs. We assume the parties' familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history, and the issues presented for review.
"[W]e review a trial court's decision whether to award attorneys' fees to a prevailing party, and in what amount, under an abuse of discretion standard." Haley v. Pataki, 106 F.3d 478, 481 (2d Cir.1997) (internal quotation marks omitted). Upon review of the record, we discern no abuse of discretion and affirm the district court's order for substantially the reasons set forth in its thorough and well-reasoned opinion.
For the foregoing reasons, and finding no merit in Neroni's other arguments, we hereby AFFIRM the order of the district court.