Case Name: Robert Anderson, Plaintiff, v. Dowling College, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. Broadway Maintenance Corp., Third-Party Defendant; Aramark Corporation, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1999-09-27
Citations: 264 A.D.2d 791
Docket Number: 
Parties: Robert Anderson, Plaintiff, v Dowling College, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. Broadway Maintenance Corp., Third-Party Defendant; Aramark Corporation, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 264
Pages: 791–791

Head Matter:
Robert Anderson, Plaintiff, v Dowling College, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. Broadway Maintenance Corp., Third-Party Defendant; Aramark Corporation, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
[695 NYS2d 701]

Opinion:
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant third-party plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.), dated July 22, 1998, as granted the cross motion of the third-party defendant Aramark Corporation for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint insofar as asserted against it.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The respondent, Aramark Corporation (hereinafter Aramark), made out a prima facie case that it was entitled to summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint insofar as asserted against it. Since the defendant third-party plaintiff failed to show the existence of a factual question on this issue, the Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment to Aramark (see generally, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557). S. Miller, J. P., O'Brien, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.