Case Name: Louis Glick, Appellant, v. David Lieb et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1944-12-21
Citations: 183 Misc. 869
Docket Number: 
Parties: Louis Glick, Appellant, v. David Lieb et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 183
Pages: 869–870

Head Matter:
Louis Glick, Appellant, v. David Lieb et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
December 21, 1944.
Joseph J. Kozinn for appellant.
Jacob E. Heller for respondents;

Opinion:
Memorandum
Per Curiam.
Assuming that respondent Lieb may be deemed to have signed the note on its face otherwise than as a maker, within the meaning of section 113 of the Negotiable Instruments Law, that provision of the statute does not conclusively establish that he is in fact an indorser; and it was error to exclude evidence to show he was a comaker.
The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.
Hammer, Shientag and Hecht, JJ., concur.
Judgment reversed, etc.