Case Name: Whitney LASSITER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-06-21
Citations: 474 F. App'x 234
Docket Number: No. 12-1162
Parties: Whitney LASSITER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 474
Pages: 234–234

Head Matter:
Whitney LASSITER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant—Appellee.
No. 12-1162.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 11, 2012.
Decided: June 21, 2012.
Whitney Lassiter, Appellant Pro Se. Scott William Kezman, Mark Edward Warmbier, Kaufman & Cañóles, PC, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Whitney Lassiter appeals the district court's orders granting summary judgment and dismissing her claims and denying her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lassiter v. Huntington Ingalls Indus., Inc., No. 4:11-cv-00101-RAJ-DEM (E.D.Va. Jan. 10, 2012). We grant Lassiter's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.