Case Name: Antonio Palozzi v. The American Brass Company
Court: Connecticut Superior Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1947-04-25
Citations: 15 Conn. Supp. 33
Docket Number: File No. 16934
Parties: Antonio Palozzi v. The American Brass Company
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Supplement
Volume: 15
Pages: 33–34

Head Matter:
Antonio Palozzi v. The American Brass Company
Superior Court New Haven at Waterbury
File No. 16934
Memorandum filed April 25, 1947.
Margaret Connors Driscoll, of Bridgeport, for the Plaintiff.
Carmody, Larkin & Torrance, of Waterbury, for the Defendant.

Opinion:
MELLITZ, J.
This is an appeal from a finding and award of a workmen's compensation commissioner. The defendant moves to erase the appeal on 'the ground that the appeal was not taken within ten days after entry of the finding and award by the commissioner, as required by General Statutes, Cum. Sup. 1935, § 1614c.
The statutory requirement has been construed to mean that an appeal must be taken within ten days after notice to the appellant of the entry of the finding and award. Murphy v. Elms Hotel, 104 Conn. 351, 352. The objection sought to be raised by the defendant involves the determination of a question of fact. A plea in abatement and not a motion to erase was the appropriate remedy to which the defendant should have resorted to present the question. Id., p. 354.
The motion to erase is denied.