Case Name: MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, etc., Petitioner, v. Victoria R. BRENNAN, Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2001-11-21
Citations: 802 So. 2d 1154
Docket Number: No. 3D01-1814
Parties: MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, etc., Petitioner, v. Victoria R. BRENNAN, Respondent.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and FLETCHER and SORONDO, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 802
Pages: 1154–1157

Head Matter:
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, etc., Petitioner, v. Victoria R. BRENNAN, Respondent.
No. 3D01-1814.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 21, 2001.
Robert A. Ginsburg, Miami-Dade County Attorney and Joni Armstrong Coffey, Assistant Miami-Dade County Attorney, for petitioner.
H. Scott Fingerhut, Miami, for respondent.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and FLETCHER and SORONDO, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Because the circuit court obviously and improperly reweighed conflicting evidence presented at the zoning hearing and substituted its judgment for that of the zoning board, we quash the decision under review, which set aside the board's denial of a variance sought by the respondent. Dusseau v. Metropolitan Dade County, 794 So.2d 1270 (Fla.2001); Metropolitan Dade County v. Blumenthal, 675 So.2d 598 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), review dismissed, 680 So.2d 421 (Fla.1996).
Certiorari granted.
SCHWARTZ, C.J., and FLETCHER and SORONDO, JJ., concur.