Case Name: Uberlando LEYVA and Alicia Llanes, Appellants, v. Salvador TRUJILLO and Enterprise Leasing Company, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2010-01-27
Citations: 26 So. 3d 664
Docket Number: No. 3D08-2090
Parties: Uberlando LEYVA and Alicia Llanes, Appellants, v. Salvador TRUJILLO and Enterprise Leasing Company, Appellees.
Judges: Before RAMIREZ, C.J., and ROTHENBERG, J., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 26
Pages: 664–664

Head Matter:
Uberlando LEYVA and Alicia Llanes, Appellants, v. Salvador TRUJILLO and Enterprise Leasing Company, Appellees.
No. 3D08-2090.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan. 27, 2010.
Lidsky, Vaccaro, Montes & Martinez and Juan C. Montes and Daniel Martinez, Hialeah, for appellants.
Cooney, Mattson, Lance, Blackburn, Richards & O’Connor and Warren B. Kwavnick, Ft. Lauderdale, for appellees.
Before RAMIREZ, C.J., and ROTHENBERG, J., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
ROTHENBERG, J.
In this automobile negligence action, the plaintiffs, Uberlando Leyva and Alicia Llanes, appeal the denial of their motion for new trial which asserted that the jury's verdict of no liability on the part of the defendants, Salvador Trujillo and Enterprise Leasing Company, is against the manifest weight of the evidence. As the evidence adduced at trial was conflicting, we find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for new trial. See Weatherly v. Louis, — So.3d -(Fla. 3d DCA 2009); Rosario-Paredes v. J.C. Wrecker Sen., 975 So.2d 1205 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008).
The remaining issue raised by the plaintiffs lacks merit. Accordingly, we affirm.
Affirmed.