Case Name: Glenn WETZLER, Appellant, v. BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL, et al., Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2010-08-17
Citations: 321 S.W.3d 447
Docket Number: No. ED 94034
Parties: Glenn WETZLER, Appellant, v. BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL, et al., Respondents.
Judges: Before ROY L. RICHTER, C.J., KENNETH M. ROMINES, J., and JAMES R. HARTENBACH, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 321
Pages: 447–447

Head Matter:
Glenn WETZLER, Appellant, v. BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL, et al., Respondents.
No. ED 94034.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Aug. 17, 2010.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Sept. 15, 2010.
Application for Transfer Denied Oct. 26, 2010.
Burton Newman, David Perney, David Wm. Horan, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Patrick Lysaught, Kansas City, MO, Murray S. Levin, Philadelphia, PA, Mary Anne Mellow, Andrew D. Ryan, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent, Metronies and Regeneration Tech.
Kenneth W. Bean, Chellie Butel, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent, Barnes Jewish Hospital.
Lisa A. Pake, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent, The Washington University.
Before ROY L. RICHTER, C.J., KENNETH M. ROMINES, J., and JAMES R. HARTENBACH, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Glenn Wetzler ("Wetzler") appeals the trial court's decision granting Regeneration Technologies, Inc. ("RTI"), Medtronic, Inc. ("Medtronic"), and Barnes Jewish Hospital's ("collectively Respondents") Motion for Summary Judgment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).