Case Name: In the INTEREST OF D.W., Appellant, v. JUVENILE OFFICER, TWENTY-SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2016-04-26
Citations: 509 S.W.3d 115
Docket Number: No. ED 103084
Parties: In the INTEREST OF D.W., Appellant, v. JUVENILE OFFICER, TWENTY-SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, Respondent.
Judges: Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Roy L. Richter, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 509
Pages: 115–116

Head Matter:
In the INTEREST OF D.W., Appellant, v. JUVENILE OFFICER, TWENTY-SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, Respondent.
No. ED 103084
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
FILED: April 26, 2016
For Appellant: Craig A. Johnston, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, Missouri 65203.
For Respondent: Susan C. Guerra, 920 N. Vandeventer Blvd., St. Louis, Missouri 68108.
Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Roy L. Richter, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
D.W. ("Juvenile") appeals from the court's judgment, adopting the juvenile court commissioner's finding and recommendations that Juvenile committed what would have been, if he were an adult, tampering in the first degree, in violation of Section 569.080, RSMo (Cum. Supp. 2005). Juvenile was ordered to be committed to the care, custody, and control of the Division of Youth Services for appropriate placement. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).