Case Name: In the Interest of D.C.S., D.E.S., Jr., M.J.S., Z.N.S.; Plaintiffs Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. A.P.S.; Appellant D.E.S., Sr., D.E.S., R.M.C., and John Doe, Defendants
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-12-23
Citations: 121 S.W.3d 575
Docket Number: No. WD 63087
Parties: In the Interest of D.C.S., D.E.S., Jr., M.J.S., Z.N.S.; Plaintiffs Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. A.P.S.; Appellant D.E.S., Sr., D.E.S., R.M.C., and John Doe, Defendants.
Judges: Before THOMAS H. NEWTON, P.J., PATRICIA A. BRECKENRIDGE and PAUL M. SPINDEN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 121
Pages: 575–576

Head Matter:
In the Interest of D.C.S., D.E.S., Jr., M.J.S., Z.N.S.; Plaintiffs Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. A.P.S.; Appellant D.E.S., Sr., D.E.S., R.M.C., and John Doe, Defendants.
No. WD 63087.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Dec. 23, 2003.
Bradley P. Grill, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant.
David B. King, III, Platte City, MO, for Plaintiffs.
Mark A. Hubbard, Platte City, MO, for Respondent.
D.E.S., Sr., D.E.S., R.M.C., and John Doe, defendants.
Before THOMAS H. NEWTON, P.J., PATRICIA A. BRECKENRIDGE and PAUL M. SPINDEN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
A.P.S. appeals from the judgment of the trial court, which terminated her parental rights. Because we conclude that the trial court made adequate findings and they were supported by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence, we affirm. A memorandum setting forth the rationale for our decision has been furnished to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).