Case Name: UNITED STATES, Appellee v. GREGORY S. MARSALA, Seaman Recruit, U. S. Navy, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Military Appeals
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1970-11-06
Citations: 20 C.M.A. 124
Docket Number: No. 23,074
Parties: UNITED STATES, Appellee v GREGORY S. MARSALA, Seaman Recruit, U. S. Navy, Appellant
Judges: Judge Darden concurs.
Reporter: Decisions of the United States Court of Military Appeals
Volume: 20
Pages: 124–125

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES, Appellee v GREGORY S. MARSALA, Seaman Recruit, U. S. Navy, Appellant
20 USCMA 124, 42 CMR 316
No. 23,074
November 6, 1970
Captain Harry N. Lembeck, USMCR, was on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.
Lieutenant Colonel Charles J. Keever, USMC, was on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion:
Opinion of the Court
Quinn, Chief Judge:
We granted review to consider the correctness of the acceptance of the accused's plea of guilty to a specification alleging unauthorized absence of approximately six weeks, in violation of Article 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 886, and the effect on the sentence of the erroneous consideration of evidence of punishment under Article 15, Code, supra, 10 USC § 815, as determined in United States v Johnson, 19 USCMA 464, 42 CMR 66 (1970).
Our decision in United States v Palos, 20 USCMA 104, 42 CMR 296, decided this date, sustains the acceptance of the plea. The number and the nature of the acts of misconduct reflected in the record of the Article 15 punishment persuade us that there was a fair risk that the record affected the sentence. United States v Worrell, 19 USCMA 487, 42 CMR 89 (1970). Accordingly, we reverse the decision of the United States Navy Court of Military Review as to the sentence and return the record of trial to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy for submission to the Court of Military Review for redetermination of the sentence.
Judge Darden concurs.