Case Name: James E. LANDRUM, Petitioner-Appellant, v. W.F. DALIUS, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-01-22
Citations: 55 F. App'x 147
Docket Number: No. 02-6637
Parties: James E. LANDRUM, Petitioner-Appellant, v. W.F. DALIUS, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 55
Pages: 147–147

Head Matter:
James E. LANDRUM, Petitioner-Appellant, v. W.F. DALIUS, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 02-6637.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 16, 2003.
Decided Jan. 22, 2003.
James E. Landrum, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
James E. Landrum, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Landrum v. Dalius, No. CA-02-160-5-BO (E.D.N.C. filed Mar. 14, 2002; entered Mar. 15, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.