Case Name: Robert BURKE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION EDGEFIELD, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-11-10
Citations: 112 F. App'x 919
Docket Number: No. 04-7273
Parties: Robert BURKE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION EDGEFIELD, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 112
Pages: 919–920

Head Matter:
Robert BURKE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION EDGEFIELD, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 04-7273.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 4, 2004.
Decided: Nov. 10, 2004.
Cheryl Johns Sturm, Chadds Ford, Pennsylvania, for Appellant.
Christie Newman, Office of the United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Robert Burke, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Burke v. Warden, FCI Edgefield, No. CA-03-2534-6-20AK (D.S.C. July 8, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED