Case Name: Vance Donnell HESTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-06-09
Citations: 326 F. App'x 186
Docket Number: No. 08-2150
Parties: Vance Donnell HESTER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 326
Pages: 186–187

Head Matter:
Vance Donnell HESTER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 08-2150.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 17, 2009.
Decided: June 9, 2009.
Henry Clifton Hester, Hester Grady & Hester, P.L.L.C, Elizabethtown, North Carolina, for Appellant. George E.B. Holding, United States Attorney, Karen J. Aviles, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Vance Donnell Hester appeals the district court's order denying his motion for judgment on the pleadings and granting the Commissioner's motion for judgment on the pleadings in his action seeking review of the Commissioner's decision to deny him disability insurance benefits and Supplemental Security Income under the Social Security Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court, Hester v. Astrue, No. 7:07-cv-00125-D (E.D.N.C. Aug. 12, 2008), and our decision in Mickles v. Shalala, 29 F.3d 918 (4th Cir.1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.