Case Name: Issac MARTINEZ-MEMIJE, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-09-11
Citations: 292 F. App'x 663
Docket Number: No. 06-75346
Parties: Issac MARTINEZ-MEMIJE, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 292
Pages: 663–664

Head Matter:
Issac MARTINEZ-MEMIJE, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 06-75346.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 8, 2008.
Filed Sept. 11, 2008.
Issac Martinez-Memije, Corona, CA, for Petitioner.
CAC-District, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Le-fevre Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Oil, Ana T. Zablah-Mon-roe, Esquire, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Issac Martinez-Memije, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge's deportation order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Fernandez-Ruiz v. Gonzales, 468 F.3d 1159, 1163 (9th Cii'.2006), and deny the petition for review.
We reject Martinez-Memije's contentions that the agency erred and violated due process in deciding that his 1998 felony conviction under Cal. Health & Safety Code § 11351 is an aggravated felony. See Rendon v. Mukasey, 520 F.3d 967, 976 (9th Cir.2008) ("[Possession of a controlled substance with the intent to sell contains a trafficking element and is an aggravated felony."). Martinez-Memije's plea agreement establishes that he pled guilty because he "willfully [and] unlawfully possessed tar heroin [in] a sufficient quantity for sale." See Parrilla v. Gonzales, 414 F.3d 1038, 1043 (9th Cir.2005) (a written plea agreement is a judicially noticeable document under the modified categorical approach described in Shepard v. United States, 544 U.S. 13, 125 S.Ct. 1254, 161 L.Ed.2d 205 (2005)).
We also reject Martinez-Memije's contention that his conviction does not bar him from establishing good moral character for purposes of suspension of deportation and voluntary departure. See 8 U.S.C. § 1101(f)(8) ("No person shall be regarded as, or found to be, a person of good moral character who, during the period for which good moral character is required to be established, is . one who at any time has been convicted of an aggravated felony[.]"); Castiglia v. INS, 108 F.3d 1101, 1103 (9th Cir.1997) (section 1101(f)(8) "evidences [congressional] intent that aggravated-felony convictions be an absolute bar to a finding of good moral character").
In light of our disposition, we need not address Martinez-Memije's conviction under Cal. Health & Safety Code § 11352(a).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.