Case Name: Varick F. DuBOSE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-09-26
Citations: 585 So. 2d 1198
Docket Number: No. 90-3665
Parties: Varick F. DuBOSE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: JOANOS, C.J., and SMITH and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 585
Pages: 1198–1198

Head Matter:
Varick F. DuBOSE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 90-3665.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Sept. 26, 1991.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Laura Rush, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Varick F. DuBose has appealed his sentencing as an habitual felony offender. We affirm, but as conceded by the state, must remand for correction of the written sentencing order, on which the trial judge erroneously marked the habitual offender section for DuBose's misdemeanor convictions. Upon remand, the sentencing order for Counts II, III and V must be corrected to reflect that the special sentencing provision for habitual offender status does not apply to these misdemeanor offenses. See Peterson v. State, 576 So.2d 1385 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).
JOANOS, C.J., and SMITH and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.