Case Name: ASSOCIATED GAS DISTRIBUTORS, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent. And Consolidated Cases
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1990-03-30
Citations: 898 F.2d 809
Docket Number: No. 88-1385
Parties: ASSOCIATED GAS DISTRIBUTORS, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent. And Consolidated Cases.
Judges: Before WALD, Chief Judge; MIKVA, EDWARDS, RUTH BADER GINSBURG, SILBERMAN, BUCKLEY, WILLIAMS, D.H. GINSBURG, SENTELLE and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 898
Pages: 809–811

Head Matter:
ASSOCIATED GAS DISTRIBUTORS, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent. And Consolidated Cases.
No. 88-1385.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
March 30, 1990.

Opinion:
ON PETITIONERS' SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
Before WALD, Chief Judge; MIKVA, EDWARDS, RUTH BADER GINSBURG, SILBERMAN, BUCKLEY, WILLIAMS, D.H. GINSBURG, SENTELLE and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The Suggestions for Rehearing En Banc of the various parties have been circulated to the full court. The taking of a vote was requested only on the issue of whether the equitable sharing mechanism mandated by respondent in Order No. 500 violates the filed rate doctrine. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular, active service did not vote in favor of rehearing en banc. Upon consideration of the foregoing it is
ORDERED by the Court en banc that all of the suggestions are denied.
Circuit Judges D.H. GINSBURG and CLARENCE THOMAS did not participate in this order.
A statement of Circuit Judge STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc is attached.
A statement of Chief Judge WALD dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc, joined by Circuit Judges MIKYA and HARRY T. EDWARDS, is also attached.