Case Name: Thomas Kelly v. Bruno Treu
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1987-01-16
Citations: 9 Conn. App. 818
Docket Number: 5040
Parties: Thomas Kelly v. Bruno Treu
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Appellate Reports
Volume: 9
Pages: 818–819

Head Matter:
Thomas Kelly v. Bruno Treu
(5040)
Borden, Daly and Bieluch, Js.
Submitted on briefs January 8
decision released January 16, 1987
Thomas K. McDonough filed a brief for the appellant (defendant).
Kevin T. Nixon filed a brief for the appellee (plaintiff).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This appeal by the defendant challenges a judgment rendered by the trial court on the ground that the facts found by the trial court were erroneous. An appellate court may not retry facts and its duty upon review of such a claim is limited to a determination of whether the trial court's judgment was clearly erroneous in this respect or otherwise contrary to law. Cook v. Nye, 9 Conn. App. 221, 224-25, 518 A.2d 77 (1986). We have carefully reviewed the record and briefs in this appeal and conclude that there is no error.
There is no error.