Case Name: Lula DUKE, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Eric VICKERS, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1996-02-13
Citations: 914 S.W.2d 869
Docket Number: No. 68158
Parties: Lula DUKE, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Eric VICKERS, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and DOWD, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 914
Pages: 869–869

Head Matter:
Lula DUKE, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Eric VICKERS, Defendant/Respondent.
No. 68158.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Feb. 13, 1996.
Lula Duke, St. Louis, Pro Se.
Eric E. Vickers, Vickers & Associates, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and DOWD, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Client appeals from a judgment for attorney in client's action for refund of attorney's fees. Client filed an action in small claims court for a refund of $1,500.00 of $2,000.00 client paid to attorney. Attorney counterclaimed for $620.00, and the small claims court found for attorney on both claims and ordered client to pay $620.00 to attorney. Following a trial de novo, the court entered judgment for attorney on client's claim and for client on attorney's counterclaim. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. Rule 84.16(b).