Case Name: James HAMMELMAN, Appellant, v. WINTERGREEN DEVELOPMENT, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-06-20
Citations: 200 S.W.3d 114
Docket Number: No. ED 87126
Parties: James HAMMELMAN, Appellant, v. WINTERGREEN DEVELOPMENT, Respondent.
Judges: Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J. and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J. and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 200
Pages: 114–115

Head Matter:
James HAMMELMAN, Appellant, v. WINTERGREEN DEVELOPMENT, Respondent.
No. ED 87126.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
June 20, 2006.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 26, 2006.
Application for Transfer Denied Sept. 26, 2006.
Jim Hammelman, St. Louis, MO, pro se.
Raymond H. Dickhaner, Hillsboro, MO, for respondent.
Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J. and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J. and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
James Hammelman (Hammelman) appeals from the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Wintergreen Development (Wintergreen) in Hammel-man's action for damages in connection with a real estate sales contract.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. Judgment affirmed in accordance with 84.16(b).