Case Name: Stanley Earl CORBETT, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth LASSITER; Mr. Waddell; Mr. Pulley; Michael Norris; Officer Brantley; Officer Bixler; Officer Jones; Jared Welch; Robert Moore; Sergeant Holley; Officer Alexander; Timmie Hicks, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-01-06
Citations: 627 F. App'x 279
Docket Number: No. 15-7089
Parties: Stanley Earl CORBETT, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth LASSITER; Mr. Waddell; Mr. Pulley; Michael Norris; Officer Brantley; Officer Bixler; Officer Jones; Jared Welch; Robert Moore; Sergeant Holley; Officer Alexander; Timmie Hicks, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 627
Pages: 279–280

Head Matter:
Stanley Earl CORBETT, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth LASSITER; Mr. Waddell; Mr. Pulley; Michael Norris; Officer Brantley; Officer Bixler; Officer Jones; Jared Welch; Robert Moore; Sergeant Holley; Officer Alexander; Timmie Hicks, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15-7089.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 21, 2015.
Decided: Jan. 6, 2016.
Stanley Earl Corbett, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Stanley Earl Corbett, Jr., appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Corbett v. Lassiter, No. 5:14-cfc-03264-BO (E.D.N.C. June 25, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.