Case Name: In the Matter of Douglas Wallace, Petitioner, v. Department of Sanitation of the City of New York et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2003-03-25
Citations: 303 A.D.2d 295
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Douglas Wallace, Petitioner, v Department of Sanitation of the City of New York et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 303
Pages: 295–296

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Douglas Wallace, Petitioner, v Department of Sanitation of the City of New York et al., Respondents.
[756 NYS2d 571]

Opinion:
—Determination of respondent Department of Sanitation, dated May 18, 2000, finding petitioner guilty of specified misconduct and imposing the penalty of dismissal, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding, brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Bruce Allen, J.], entered February 7, 2001), dismissed, without costs.
The determination was supported by substantial evidence (Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436, 443-444 [1987]; see also People ex rel. Vega v Smith, 66 NY2d 130 [1985]) that petitioner was guilty of misconduct when he failed to respond to telephone calls, failed to report to the Department clinic, was absent without leave, and did not maintain a valid driver's license, all in violation of Department of Sanitation rules. The Administrative Law Judge properly rejected petitioner's various excuses and explanations. The penalty of dismissal was not disproportionate to the offenses and does not shock the conscience (see Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, 39-40 [2001]), particularly since petitioner displayed a flagrant pattern of sick leave abuses.
We have considered and rejected petitioner's remaining arguments. Concur — Buckley, P.J., Rosenberger, Lerner, Friedman and Gonzalez, JJ.