Case Name: Elsie M. Gilbert, et vir., v. John Mendenhall, et al.
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1933-09-22
Citations: 112 Fla. 86
Docket Number: 
Parties: Elsie M. Gilbert, et vir., v. John Mendenhall, et al.
Judges: Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 112
Pages: 86–87

Head Matter:
Elsie M. Gilbert, et vir., v. John Mendenhall, et al.
150 So. 137.
Division B.
Opinion Filed September 22, 1933.
Hampton, Bull & Crom, for Plaintiffs in Error;
E. P. Martin, for Defendants in Error.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the resepective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised, of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Davis, C. J., and Brown, J., dissent. .