Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Frank Bonino, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1956-04-27
Citations: 1 N.Y.2d 752
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Frank Bonino, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 1
Pages: 752–755

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Frank Bonino, Appellant.
Reargued February 7, 1956;
decided April 27, 1956.
Solon B. Hanft for appellant.
Edward S. Silver, District Attorney (William I. Siegel of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
Upon reargument: Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered in accordance with the following memorandum: Since the United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, has held that the writ of habeas corpus must issue to his codefendant Caminito because his confessions were inadmissible, the defendant Bonino should, in the interest of justice, receive a new trial with his (Bonino's) confessions excluded.
Concur: Conway, Ch. J., Fttld, Van Voorhis and Burke, JJ. Desmond, J., dissents in the following opinion in which Dye and Froessel, JJ., concur: