Case Name: The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company v. Samuel P. Willson, Chief Justice, et al.
Court: Supreme Court of Texas
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1932-01-06
Citations: 121 Tex. 127
Docket Number: Motion No. 9935
Parties: The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company v. Samuel P. Willson, Chief Justice, et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Reports
Volume: 121
Pages: 127–127

Head Matter:
The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company v. Samuel P. Willson, Chief Justice, et al.
Motion No. 9935.
Decided January 6, 1932.
(45 S. W., 2d Series, 554.)
Touchstone, Wright, Gormley & Price and Robert B. Holland, all of Dallas, for relator.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The relators have a complete remedy secured by writ of error by articles 1821 and 1728, Rev. Stats. Mandamus will no longer lie to require the Court of Civil Appeals to certify the question of conflict in this character of case; the former practice was based on the absence of such remedy. International & G. N. R. R. Co. v. Pleasants, 116 Texas, 568.
The motion for leave to file the petition for mandamus is therefore refused.