Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-12-02
Citations: 302 F. App'x 651
Docket Number: No. 07-30267
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 302
Pages: 651–651

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-30267.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 24, 2008.
Filed Dec. 02, 2008.
Joseph E. Thaggard, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Helena, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
John Paul Brennan, Sacramento, CA, for D efendant-App ellant.
Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Anthony Martinez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 120-month sentence for conspiracy to possess methamphetamine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Martinez's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.