Case Name: In the Matter of the Claim of Delia Lanphier, Respondent, against Air Preheater Corporation et al., Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1938-07-07
Citations: 278 N.Y. 403
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Claim of Delia Lanphier, Respondent, against Air Preheater Corporation et al., Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 278
Pages: 403–408

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Claim of Delia Lanphier, Respondent, against Air Preheater Corporation et al., Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent.
Argued May 18, 1938;
decided July 7, 1938.
Raymond F. Nichols for appellants.
The death of the employee was not caused by an accidental injury within the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. (Cons. Laws, ch. 60.) (Matter of Lerner v. Rump Bros., 241 N. Y. 153; Matter of Jeffreyes v. Sager Co., 198 App. Div. 446; 233 N. Y. 535; Matter of Doulin v. City of Saratoga Springs, 236 App. Div. 749; 261 N. Y. 558; Matter of Connelly v. Hunt Furniture Co., 240 N. Y. 83; D’Oliveri v. Austin, Nichols & Co., 211 App. Div. 295.)
John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General (Leon Freedman of counsel), for State, Industrial Board, respondent.
The injuries sustained by the deceased and which resulted in his death were accidental injuries arising out of and in the course of his employment. (Matter of Connelly v. Hunt Furniture Co., 240 N. Y. 83; Christian v. State Conservation Comm., 191 App. Div. 635; Matter of Rist v. Larkin & Sangster, 171 App. Div. 71; D’Oliveri v. Austin, Nichols &,Co., 211 App. Div. 295; Matter of Lerner v. Rump Bros., 241 N. Y. 153; Campbell v. Clausen-Flanagan Brewery, 183 App. Div. 499; Matter of Murray v. Cummings Const. Co., 197 App. Div. 903; 232 N. Y. 507; Hernon v. Holahan, 182 App. Div. 126; Days v. Trimmer & Sons, Inc., 176 App. Div. 124; Quick v. Illston Ice Co., 195 App. Div. 676; Matter of Kern v. Premier Coal Saving Device Corp., 246 App. Div. 661; Matter of Hocke v. Emdee Management Corp., 245 App. Div. 882; 269 N. Y. 592.)
Noel S. Symons for claimant, respondent.
Deceased’s death was caused by an accident within the purview of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. (Cole v. Watson [1915], App. Cas. 1; Rist v. Larkin & Sangster, 171 App. Div. 71; Cook v. International Paper Co., 244 App. Div. 849; Hocke v. Emdee Management Corp., 269 N. Y. 592; Matter of Connelly v. Hunt Furniture Co., 240 N. Y. 83; Matter of Katz v. Kadans & Co., 232 N. Y. 420; Matter of Madura v. City of New York, 238 N. Y. 214; Matter of Lurye v. Stern Brothers Dept. Store, 275 N. Y. 182; Baltimore & Ohio Ry. Co. v. Clark, 59 Fed. Rep. [2d] 595; Ismay, Imre Co. v. Williamson [1908], A. C. 437; Walsh v. River Spinning Co., 41 R. I. 490; Zacharie v. Interborough R. T. Co., 211 App. Div. 828; Matter of Hughes v. St. Patrick’s Cathedral, 245 N. Y. 201; Ford Motor Co. v. Hunter, 199 N. E. Rep. 85.)

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The State Industrial Board has found that on December 24, 1934, while W. J. Lanphier " was engaged in the regular course of his employment and while working for his employer, repairing and installing a preheater at Belle, West Virginia, he was required to work in a closed preheater, which subjected him to an abnormal temperature of about 150° F. and as a result of which exposure he became drenched with perspiration and sustained a chill, which resulted in lobar pneumonia, causing his death on January 1, 1935. The death of the said W. J. Lanphier was the natural and unavoidable result of the accidental injuries sustained by him on December 24,1934, and their resultant effects."
Pneumonia is a disease for which, under the Workmen's Compensation Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 67), compensation may be awarded only when it is the result of an accidental injury. The inception of the disease must be assignable to something " catastrophic or extraordinary." A chill resulting from exposure to conditions which are normal in the conduct of the business in which the workman is employed, though followed by pneumonia, is not an accidental injury. (Matter of Lerner v. Rump Bros., 241 N. Y. 153.)
The job on which the deceased was working was what is known as a " reconditioning job." On a " construction iob " the temperatures are not very high. On a " reconditioning job " the workmen are frequently exposed to great heat and perspire profusely. The deceased knew that while working in a closed preheater the heat was great. He had previously told his wife that the temperature at the plant where he was working was at times between 130° and 150°. The heat on the day when the deceased suffered the chill was perhaps a little greater than usual, but there is nothing in the evidence which suggests that the difference was significant. The need for repairing the preheater may have arisen from an accidental happening, but the work in which the deceased was employed included repairing or reconditioning preheaters. He was exposed to this great heat because he accepted employment which would normally include repair jobs where the heat would be great. That circumstance distinguishes this case from the case of Matter of Hocke v. Emdee Management Corp. (245 App. Div. 882; affd., 269 N. Y. 592), where through an unexpected accident a superintendent of an apartment house was compelled to enter a room filled with steam from a valve which had accidentally become defective. Exposure of a superintendent of an apartment house to such conditions created by accident is extraordinary and may be regarded as an accident. Exposure of a workman to such conditions, though created by accident, cannot be regarded as accidental where the workman is employed to work under similar conditions, however arising. (Cf. Matter of Doulin v. City of Saratoga Springs, 236 App. Div. 749; affd., 261 N. Y. 558.)
The order of the Appellate Division and the award of the State Industrial Board should be reversed and the matter remitted to the State Industrial Board for a new hearing, without costs.