Case Name: Lawrence Verline WILDER, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WILMINGTON NORTH CAROLINA POLICE DEPARTMENT; Chief Ralph Evangelous, Wilmington North Carolina Police Department; Wanda Copley, County Attorney; Benjamin David, District County Office; Unknown, Wilmington North Carolina Police Officer, Defendant-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-07-25
Citations: 655 F. App'x 175
Docket Number: No. 16-1255
Parties: Lawrence Verline WILDER, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WILMINGTON NORTH CAROLINA POLICE DEPARTMENT; Chief Ralph Evangelous, Wilmington North Carolina Police Department; Wanda Copley, County Attorney; Benjamin David, District County Office; Unknown, Wilmington North Carolina Police Officer, Defendant-Appellees.
Judges: Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 655
Pages: 175–176

Head Matter:
Lawrence Verline WILDER, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WILMINGTON NORTH CAROLINA POLICE DEPARTMENT; Chief Ralph Evangelous, Wilmington North Carolina Police Department; Wanda Copley, County Attorney; Benjamin David, District County Office; Unknown, Wilmington North Carolina Police Officer, Defendant-Appellees.
No. 16-1255
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 21, 2016
Decided: July 25, 2016
Lawrence Yerline Wilder, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding prepedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., appeals the district court's order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wilder v. Wilmington N.C. Police Dep't, No. 7:09-cv-00036-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 22, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED