Case Name: In the Matter of the Application of Title Guarantee and Trust Company, as Trustee, Owner and Holder of a Certain Mortgage Affecting Property Situate in the County of Kings, State of New York, and Known as 8640 Bay Parkway, Borough of Brooklyn, City of New York, for an Order Directing the Payment of Surplus Income of Said Property to Apply Towards the Reduction of Any Past Due Principal of Said Mortgage or Permitting Foreclosure of Said Mortgage, Pursuant to the Provisions of Section 1077-c of the Civil Practice Act. Title Guarantee and Trust Company, Appellant; Ridge Holding Corp., Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1942-01-12
Citations: 263 A.D. 876
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Application of Title Guarantee and Trust Company, as Trustee, Owner and Holder of a Certain Mortgage Affecting Property Situate in the County of Kings, State of New York, and Known as 8640 Bay Parkway, Borough of Brooklyn, City of New York, for an Order Directing the Payment of Surplus Income of Said Property to Apply Towards the Reduction of Any Past Due Principal of Said Mortgage or Permitting Foreclosure of Said Mortgage, Pursuant to the Provisions of Section 1077-c of the Civil Practice Act. Title Guarantee and Trust Company, Appellant; Ridge Holding Corp., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 263
Pages: 876–876

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Application of Title Guarantee and Trust Company, as Trustee, Owner and Holder of a Certain Mortgage Affecting Property Situate in the County of Kings, State of New York, and Known as 8640 Bay Parkway, Borough of Brooklyn, City of New York, for an Order Directing the Payment of Surplus Income of Said Property to Apply Towards the Reduction of Any Past Due Principal of Said Mortgage or Permitting Foreclosure of Said Mortgage, Pursuant to the Provisions of Section 1077-c of the Civil Practice Act. Title Guarantee and Trust Company, Appellant; Ridge Holding Corp., Respondent.

Opinion:
Motion for reargument denied, "with ten dollars costs. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ.