Case Name: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Charles Edward BROOKS, Petitioner
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2018-01-03
Citations: 177 A.3d 822
Docket Number: No. 434 WAL 2015
Parties: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Charles Edward BROOKS, Petitioner
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 177
Pages: 822–823

Head Matter:
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Charles Edward BROOKS, Petitioner
No. 434 WAL 2015
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
January 3, 2018

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 3rd day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are:
1. Is it unconstitutional to require [Petitioner]' to register for a lifetime when said registration requirement exceeds the statutory maximum penalty for [Petitioner's] offense?
2. Is the Adam Walsh Statute unconstitutional in requiring the [Petitioner] to register for a lifetime?
The judgment of sentence'is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court for reconsideration in light of Commonwealth v. Muniz, — Pa. -, 164 A.3d 1189 (2017).