Case Name: The STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Carl Benson HOLMES, Defendant and Appellant
Court: Utah Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Utah
Decision Date: 1972-03-20
Citations: 27 Utah 2d 265
Docket Number: No. 12191
Parties: The STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Carl Benson HOLMES, Defendant and Appellant.
Judges: CALLISTER, C. J., and TUCKETT, ELLETT and CROCKETT, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Utah Reports, Second Series
Volume: 27
Pages: 265–265

Head Matter:
495 P.2d 312
The STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Carl Benson HOLMES, Defendant and Appellant.
No. 12191.
Supreme Court of Utah.
March 20, 1972.
D. Gilbert Athay, S. L. Legal Defender Assn., Salt Lake City, for defendant and appellant.
Vernon B. Romney, Atty. Gen., David S. Young, Chief Asst. Atty. Gen., Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and respondent.

Opinion:
HENRIOD, Justice:
Appeal from a burglary conviction. Affirmed.
Holmes says a deputy testified on redirect examination about matters incident to a Miranda warning not testified to by him on direct examination, thereby denying him a fair trial. We find that the testimony given was not only unobjectionable, but pertinent and proper under the circumstances of this case in light of the principle that admission of testimony on redirect examination ordinarily is within the sound discretion of the trial court.
CALLISTER, C. J., and TUCKETT, ELLETT and CROCKETT, JJ., concur.