Case Name: William Schmidt, Appellant, v. Josephine Hertz et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Another
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1917-05-25
Citations: 221 N.Y. 532
Docket Number: 
Parties: William Schmidt, Appellant, v. Josephine Hertz et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Another.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 221
Pages: 532–532

Head Matter:
William Schmidt, Appellant, v. Josephine Hertz et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Another.
(Submitted May 9, 1917;
decided May 25, 1917.)
Schmidt v. Hertz, 165 App. Div. 905, appeal dismissed.
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 18, 1914, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants, respondents, entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury in an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. The respondents contended that the appeal was improperly taken from an order of the Appellate Division instead of from a judgment entered thereon.
J. Wilson Bryant and Robert S. Mullen for appellant.
S. N. Tuckman and Meyer Boskey for respondents.

Opinion:
Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan, Cardozo and McLaughlin, JJ.