Case Name: Joseph Schlitz Brewing Company, Appellant and Respondent, v. Henry J. Ester et al., Respondents and Appellants
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1899-01-10
Citations: 157 N.Y. 714
Docket Number: 
Parties: Joseph Schlitz Brewing Company, Appellant and Respondent, v. Henry J. Ester et al., Respondents and Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 157
Pages: 714–714

Head Matter:
Joseph Schlitz Brewing Company, Appellant and Respondent, v. Henry J. Ester et al., Respondents and Appellants.
Sohlite Brewing Go. v. Bíter, 86 Hun, 22, affirmed.
(Argued December 7, 1898;
decided January 10, 1899.)
Cross-appeals from a judgment of the late General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered May 14, 1895, which reversed in part, and in other respects affirmed, a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a decision of the court dismissing the complaint upon the merits, on trial at Special Term, and granted a new trial as to the part reversed.
Scott Oummings and Henry M. Hill for plaintiff.
Abraham Benedict for defendants.

Opinion:
Judgment and order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against the defendants upon their stipulation, on their appeal from the order for a new trial, as to the issue arising upon the charge that the chattel mortgage and bill of sale were in fraud of the defendant Henry J. Ester's creditors; without costs in this court to either party, on opinion below.
All concur, except Martin, J., absent.