Case Name: STATE of Missouri, ex rel., Barbara J. TURNER, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Preston E. SCHMITZ, Respondent/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-02-04
Citations: 125 S.W.3d 321
Docket Number: No. ED 81054
Parties: STATE of Missouri, ex rel., Barbara J. TURNER, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Preston E. SCHMITZ, Respondent/Appellant.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J. and MARY K. HOFF, J. and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 125
Pages: 321–321

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, ex rel., Barbara J. TURNER, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Preston E. SCHMITZ, Respondent/Appellant.
No. ED 81054.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Feb. 4, 2003.
Rehearing Denied March 20, 2003.
Robert S. Adler, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Gary L. Gardner, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J. and MARY K. HOFF, J. and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Preston E. Schmitz (Father) appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his petition for judicial review of an administrative child support order and affirming the decision of the Division of Child Support Enforcement (DCSE), which modified the amount of child support Father paid to Barbara Turner (Mother) for the support of Dani Turner (Child).
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for them information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).