Case Name: Emil MORTON d/b/a Morton Towers Company, Appellant, v. Leo GELVAN and Yetta Gelvan, his wife, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1963-04-16
Citations: 151 So. 2d 866
Docket Number: No. 62-533
Parties: Emil MORTON d/b/a Morton Towers Company, Appellant, v. Leo GELVAN and Yetta Gelvan, his wife, Appellees.
Judges: Before PEARSON, TILLMAN, C. J., and CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 151
Pages: 866–866

Head Matter:
Emil MORTON d/b/a Morton Towers Company, Appellant, v. Leo GELVAN and Yetta Gelvan, his wife, Appellees.
No. 62-533.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District
April 16, 1963.
Kovner & Mannheimer, Miami, and Morton R. Goudiss, Miami Beach, for appellant.
Von Zamft & Kravitz, Miami, for ap-pellees.
Before PEARSON, TILLMAN, C. J., and CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Defendant, counterplaintiff, appeals a final judgment for plaintiff entered after a non-jury trial. He bases his appeal on (1) the refusal of the trial judge to admit a certain letter into evidence, and (2) alleged prejudicial remarks by appellees' trial counsel.
The refusal to admit the letter proffered is sustained upon authority of Green v. Hood, Fla.App. 1960, 120 So.2d 223, 227. The alleged prejudicial remarks, having been made during a non-jury trial, are not of sufficient weight to require reversal.
Affirmed.