Case Name: Thiot Realty Corporation, Appellant, v. Irving Rosen, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1941-03-28
Citations: 176 Misc. 109
Docket Number: 
Parties: Thiot Realty Corporation, Appellant, v. Irving Rosen, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 176
Pages: 109–110

Head Matter:
Thiot Realty Corporation, Appellant, v. Irving Rosen, Respondent.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term. First Department,
March 28, 1941.
Bernard Trencher [Bertram Schleimer of counsel], for the appellant-
Harry Eisner, for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Mere silence on the part of the landlord after receipt of a letter stating that tenant wished to remain as a monthly tenant was not sufficient to establish that a month-to-month tenancy agreement was created. Something more than mere silence is necessary. Defendant was a holdover tenant and as such is liable for the rent sued for.
. Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and judgment directed in favor of plaintiff as claimed in the summons.
All concur. Present — McCook, Hammer and McLaughlin, JJ.