Case Name: S. P. PHARRIS, Respondent, v. WM. S. DOWNING, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1873-01-22
Citations: 1 Cal. Unrep. 769
Docket Number: No. 2769
Parties: S. P. PHARRIS, Respondent, v. WM. S. DOWNING, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Unreported Cases
Volume: 1
Pages: 769–769

Head Matter:
S. P. PHARRIS, Respondent, v. WM. S. DOWNING, Appellant.
No. 2769;
January 22, 1873.
Pleading. — The Statute of Limitations; in Order to foe Availed of as a defense, must have foeen pleaded.
APPEAL from Twelfth Judicial District, San Mateo County.
A. Teague for respondent; H. A. Scofield for appellant.

Opinion:
By the COURT.
— It appeared upon the argument had at the bar that the only point upon which reliance is placed to reverse the judgment is that the action is barred by the statute of limitations. It appears, however, upon looking into the record, that the statute is not pleaded.
Judgment affirmed.