Case Name: CRYSTAL TREE, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LANDMARK BANK, et al., Defendants-Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1993-03-02
Citations: 847 S.W.2d 203
Docket Number: No. 61042
Parties: CRYSTAL TREE, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LANDMARK BANK, et al., Defendants-Respondents.
Judges: Before CRANDALL, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GRIMM, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 847
Pages: 203–203

Head Matter:
CRYSTAL TREE, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LANDMARK BANK, et al., Defendants-Respondents.
No. 61042.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
March 2, 1993.
Nicholas G. Higgins, Clayton, for plaintiffs-appellants.
Thompson & Mitchell, Gordon L. Ank-ney, Bill B. Dorothy, Thena Poteat Szabo, St. Louis, for defendants-respondents.
Before CRANDALL, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GRIMM, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiffs, Crystal Tree, Inc., et al., appeal from the judgment of the trial court which directed verdict at the close of plaintiffs' evidence in favor of defendant, Landmark Bank, et al. We have reviewed the evidence and find that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).