Case Name: Michael A. NUTTER v. John DOUGHERTY, Dwight Evans, Chaka Fattah, Jonathan Saidel, and the City of Philadelphia Petition of John Dougherty; Michael A. Nutter v. John Dougherty, Dwight Evans, Chaka Fattah, and Jonathan Saidel Petition of John Dougherty; Michael A. Nutter v. John Dougherty, Chaka Fattah, and the City of Philadelphia Petition of John Dougherty
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2007-04-13
Citations: 922 A.2d 873
Docket Number: 
Parties: Michael A. NUTTER v. John DOUGHERTY, Dwight Evans, Chaka Fattah, Jonathan Saidel, and the City of Philadelphia Petition of John Dougherty. Michael A. Nutter v. John Dougherty, Dwight Evans, Chaka Fattah, and Jonathan Saidel Petition of John Dougherty. Michael A. Nutter v. John Dougherty, Chaka Fattah, and the City of Philadelphia Petition of John Dougherty.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 922
Pages: 873–874

Head Matter:
Michael A. NUTTER v. John DOUGHERTY, Dwight Evans, Chaka Fattah, Jonathan Saidel, and the City of Philadelphia Petition of John Dougherty. Michael A. Nutter v. John Dougherty, Dwight Evans, Chaka Fattah, and Jonathan Saidel Petition of John Dougherty. Michael A. Nutter v. John Dougherty, Chaka Fattah, and the City of Philadelphia Petition of John Dougherty.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
April 13, 2007.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 13th day of April, 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby granted, limited to the following issue:
Whether the Philadelphia Code Chapter 20-1000, et seq. ("Campaign Finance Law"), which places limitations on political campaign contributions, is invalid under the Home Rule Act, 53 P.S. § 13133, because it is "contrary to, or in limitation of' the Pennsylvania Election Code where the Election Code already con tains comprehensive provisions regulating the permissible size, type and manner of political campaign contributions, but also allows unlimited contributions in most instances?