Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Frank MARFO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-05-16
Citations: 571 F. App'x 250
Docket Number: No. 13-4913
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Frank MARFO, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 571
Pages: 250–250

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Frank MARFO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-4913.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 6, 2014.
Decided: May 16, 2014.
Frank Marfo, Appellant Pro Se. John Francis Purcell, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Frank Marfo appeals the district court's order denying his motion seeking the identities and notes of the grand juries that returned the indictment and superseding indictment in this case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Marfo, No. 1:11-cr-00657-MJG-3 (D.Md. Nov. 19, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.