Case Name: Glorbman Lamont BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. EWART, Classification Officer; Nurse Morgan; Master Deputy Faggart; Officer A. Lane; Lieutenant Lane, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-04-02
Citations: 517 F. App'x 134
Docket Number: No. 12-8028
Parties: Glorbman Lamont BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. EWART, Classification Officer; Nurse Morgan; Master Deputy Faggart; Officer A. Lane; Lieutenant Lane, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 517
Pages: 134–134

Head Matter:
Glorbman Lamont BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. EWART, Classification Officer; Nurse Morgan; Master Deputy Faggart; Officer A. Lane; Lieutenant Lane, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 12-8028.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 28, 2013.
Decided: April 2, 2013.
Glorbman Lamont Brown, Appellant pro se. Kenneth Ray Raynor, Templeton & Raynor, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Ap-pellees.
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Glorbman Lamont Brown appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Ewart, No. l:09-cv-00573-CCE-LPA, 2012 WL 5338574 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 30, 2012; Jan. 28, 2013). We deny Brown's motion to appoint counsel. We deny Ap-pellees' motion to dismiss. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
We construe Brown's "Traverse to Defendants Motion to Dismiss Appeal" as a timely notice of appeal from the district court's final order.