Case Name: Walter F. Pike, Individually and as Representative of the Heirs, Distributees and Estate of Florence A. Pike, Deceased, Appellant, v. State of New York, Respondent. (Action No. 1.) (And Another Action.); Thomas C. Van Amburg, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Denise Van Amburg, Deceased, Appellant, v. State of New York, Respondent. (Action No. 3.)
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1995-09-12
Citations: 86 N.Y.2d 811
Docket Number: 
Parties: Walter F. Pike, Individually and as Representative of the Heirs, Distributees and Estate of Florence A. Pike, Deceased, Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent. (Action No. 1.) (And Another Action.) Thomas C. Van Amburg, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Denise Van Amburg, Deceased, Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent. (Action No. 3.)
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 86
Pages: 811–811

Head Matter:
Walter F. Pike, Individually and as Representative of the Heirs, Distributees and Estate of Florence A. Pike, Deceased, Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent. (Action No. 1.) (And Another Action.) Thomas C. Van Amburg, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Denise Van Amburg, Deceased, Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent. (Action No. 3.)
Submitted June 12, 1995;
decided September 12, 1995

Opinion:
Motion by appellant Pike, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as affirmed the denial of his motion for reargument, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied. Motion by appellant Van Amburg for leave to appeal denied.