Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Robert L. Ingram, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2014-12-16
Citations: 24 N.Y.3d 1105
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Robert L. Ingram, Respondent.
Judges: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 24
Pages: 1105–1107

Head Matter:
[26 NE3d 242, 2 NYS3d 414]
The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Robert L. Ingram, Respondent.
Decided December 16, 2014
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Frank A. Sedita, III, District Attorney, Buffalo (David A. Heraty of counsel), for appellant.
Legal Aid Bureau of Buffalo, Inc., Buffalo (Sherry A. Chase of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
The determination whether police have reasonable suspicion to justify a stop involves a mixed question of law and fact (People v Woods, 98 NY2d 627, 628 [2002]). Where, as here, there exists record support for the Appellate Division's resolution of this question, the issue is beyond this Court's further review.
Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, in a memorandum.