Case Name: STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. A. D. ALEXANDER and Frank Alexander, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1975-07-02
Citations: 314 So. 2d 819
Docket Number: No. 74-1326
Parties: STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. A. D. ALEXANDER and Frank Alexander, Appellees.
Judges: HOBSON, A. C. J., and BOARDMAN and GRIMES, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 314
Pages: 819–819

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. A. D. ALEXANDER and Frank Alexander, Appellees.
No. 74-1326.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
July 2, 1975.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Mary Jo M. Gallay, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellant.
James A. Gardner, Public Defender, Sarasota, and Harold H. Moore, Asst., Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
The above disposition of this appeal is not to be interpreted as ruling out the admissibility of a subsequent, independent identification by the same witnesses. See Hamrick v. Wainwright, 5th Cir. 1972, 465 F.2d 940, and Commonwealth v. Richards, Pa.1974, 327 A.2d 63.
HOBSON, A. C. J., and BOARDMAN and GRIMES, JJ., concur.