Case Name: 305 East 24th Owners Corp. et al., Appellants, v. Parman Co. et al., Respondents. (And a Counterclaim Action.)
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1987-05-28
Citations: 69 N.Y.2d 991
Docket Number: 
Parties: 305 East 24th Owners Corp. et al., Appellants, v Parman Co. et al., Respondents. (And a Counterclaim Action.)
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 69
Pages: 991–994

Head Matter:
305 East 24th Owners Corp. et al., Appellants, v Parman Co. et al., Respondents. (And a Counterclaim Action.)
Argued April 28, 1987;
decided May 28, 1987
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Yvette Harmon and Ellen A. Schwartz for appellants.
Robert A. Wolf, Maxine Fass and Craig Balsam for respondents.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order, insofar as appealed from, reversed, with costs, for the reasons stated in so much of the dissenting in part opinion (122 AD2d 684, 691-703) of Presiding Justice Francis T. Murphy, Jr., at the Appellate Division as pertains to plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on the complaint, and that portion of the motion granted. The certified question answered in the negative.
Concur: Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa. Taking no part: Chief Judge Wachtler.