Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Soloman HAM, a/k/a Soloman Hamm, a/k/a Charles Brewer, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-08-01
Citations: 42 F. App'x 612
Docket Number: No. 02-6522
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Soloman HAM, a/k/a Soloman Hamm, a/k/a Charles Brewer, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 42
Pages: 612–612

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Soloman HAM, a/k/a Soloman Hamm, a/k/a Charles Brewer, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-6522.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 25, 2002.
Decided Aug. 1, 2002.
Soloman Ham, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Soloman Ham appeals the district court's order denying his motion construed as a successive 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2002) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Ham, No. CR-90-53 (E.D.Va. Nov. 13, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.