Case Name: In the Interest of C J.W., a minor. Juvenile Officer of Lincoln County, MO, Petitioner/Respondent, v. J.J.Z., Respondent/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-11-01
Citations: 175 S.W.3d 200
Docket Number: No. ED 86084
Parties: In the Interest of C J.W., a minor. Juvenile Officer of Lincoln County, MO, Petitioner/Respondent, v. J.J.Z., Respondent/Appellant.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 175
Pages: 200–200

Head Matter:
In the Interest of C J.W., a minor. Juvenile Officer of Lincoln County, MO, Petitioner/Respondent, v. J.J.Z., Respondent/Appellant.
No. ED 86084.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Nov. 1, 2005.
G. John Richards, Lincoln Co. Prosecuting Attorney, Troy, MO, for respondent.
John T. Bruere, Troy, MO, for appellant.
William W. Cheeseman, Troy, MO, Guardian Ad Litem.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Father appeals from the judgment of the trial court terminating his parental rights to his minor child. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).