Case Name: Dorothy H. FITZGERALD (Lovvern), Appellant, v. Madison J. FITZGERALD, Appellee
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1956-03-14
Citations: 86 So. 2d 165
Docket Number: 
Parties: Dorothy H. FITZGERALD (Lovvern), Appellant, v. Madison J. FITZGERALD, Appellee.
Judges: DREW, C. J., and TERRELL, HOB-SON and THORNAL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 86
Pages: 165–165

Head Matter:
Dorothy H. FITZGERALD (Lovvern), Appellant, v. Madison J. FITZGERALD, Appellee.
Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.
March 14, 1956.
Maurice Wagner, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
J. Robert Durden, Louis Ossinsky, and Horn & Ossinsky, Daytona Beach, for ap-pellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellees to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to 30 F.S.A. Rule 38 of the Rules of this- court and- it appearing to the court from an éxamination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;
It is accordingly Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the motion to affirm the. judgment appealed from be and the same is hereby granted, and the judgment is
Affirmed.
DREW, C. J., and TERRELL, HOB-SON and THORNAL, JJ., concur.