Case Name: State Bank of Pittsburg v. Williams, Appellant; Same v. Horigan, Appellant; Same v. Herb, Appellant; Same v. Nichols, Appellant; Same v. Espy, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1907-01-07
Citations: 216 Pa. 457
Docket Number: Appeals, Nos. 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11
Parties: State Bank of Pittsburg v. Williams, Appellant. Same v. Horigan, Appellant. Same v. Herb, Appellant-Same v. Nichols, Appellant. Same v. Espy, Appellant.
Judges: Before Mitchell, C. J., Fell, Brown, Mestrezat, Potter, Elkin and Stewart, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 216
Pages: 457–457

Head Matter:
State Bank of Pittsburg v. Williams, Appellant. Same v. Horigan, Appellant. Same v. Herb, Appellant-Same v. Nichols, Appellant. Same v. Espy, Appellant.
Argued Oct. 22, 1906.
January 7, 1907:
Appeals, Nos. 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11, Oct T., 1906, by defendant, from order of C. P. No. 3, Allegheny Co., Feb. T., 1905, No. 438, etc., making absolute rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in case of State Bank of Pittsburg, in the hands of John F. Steel, Receiver, v. T. J. Williams and others.
Before Mitchell, C. J., Fell, Brown, Mestrezat, Potter, Elkin and Stewart, JJ.
Affirmed.

Opinion:
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Elkin,
For reasons given in State Bank of Pittsburg v. Kirk, ante, p. 452, judgment in these cases is affirmed.