Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark CLIFTON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-09-30
Citations: 584 F. App'x 80
Docket Number: No. 14-6755
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark CLIFTON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 584
Pages: 80–80

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark CLIFTON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 14-6755.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 25, 2014.
Decided: Sept. 30, 2014.
Mark Clifton, Appellant Pro Se. Seth Morgan Wood, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Ap-pellee.
Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Mark Clifton appeals the district court's order denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis and his supplemental petition alternatively seeking relief pursuant to a writ of audita querela. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Clifton, No. 7:96-cr00062-H-2 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 15, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.