Case Name: Roger NICKLAW, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-05-01
Citations: 855 F.3d 1265
Docket Number: No. 15-14216-FF
Parties: Roger NICKLAW, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, MARCUS, WILSON, WILLIAM PRYOR, MARTIN, JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, JULIE CARNES, and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges .
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 855
Pages: 1265–1274

Head Matter:
Roger NICKLAW, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 15-14216-FF
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
05/01/2017
Todd S. Garber, Finkelstein Blankinship Frei-Pearson & Garber, LLP, White Plains, NY, Scott Rhead Shepherd, Nathan C. Zipperian, Shepherd Finkelman Miller & Shah, LLP, Fort Lauderdale, FL, William S. Consovoy, Consovoy McCarthy, PLLC, Arlington, VA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Lucia Nale, Christopher Comstock, Thomas V. Panoff, Mayer Brown, LLP, Chicago, IL, Louis F. Bonacorsi, Bryan Cave, LLP, Saint Louis, MO, April Boyer, Stephen Allan McGuinness, K & L Gates, LLP, Miami, FL, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, MARCUS, WILSON, WILLIAM PRYOR, MARTIN, JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, JULIE CARNES, and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges .
Judge Hull, having recused herself, did not participate.

Opinion:
BY THE COURT:
A petition for rehearing having been filed and a member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges in active service on this Court having voted against granting a rehearing en banc, it is ORDERED that this case will not be reheard en banc.