Case Name: Howard T. SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-06-08
Citations: 543 So. 2d 1325
Docket Number: No. 88-1470
Parties: Howard T. SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SHARP, C.J., and COWART, J., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 543
Pages: 1325–1325

Head Matter:
Howard T. SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 88-1470.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
June 8, 1989.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender and Nancye R. Crouch, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and Colin Campbell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
ORFINGER, Judge.
The appellant contends, and the State, concedes, that the trial court erred in imposing costs against him at sentencing without providing appellant with notice and an opportunity to be heard. Accordingly, we quash the imposition of costs and remand the cause for reassessment of costs after proper notice and hearing. See Harriel v. State, 520 So.2d 271 (Fla.1988); Morgan v. State, 527 So.2d 968 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Morris v. State, 524 So.2d 494 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).
Imposition of costs QUASHED; REMANDED.
SHARP, C.J., and COWART, J., concur.