Case Name: Raul JIMENEZ, a/k/a Jose Mateo, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-02-13
Citations: 556 So. 2d 532
Docket Number: No. 89-332
Parties: Raul JIMENEZ, a/k/a Jose Mateo, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before NESBITT, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 556
Pages: 532–532

Head Matter:
Raul JIMENEZ, a/k/a Jose Mateo, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 89-332.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 13, 1990.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Beth C. Weitzner, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Jacqueline M. Valdespino, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before NESBITT, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Upon the state's proper confession of error, we vacate the sentence and remand the cause for resentencing within the guidelines range. State v. Simpson, 554 So.2d 506 (Fla.1989); Franklin v. State, 545 So.2d 851 (Fla.1989); Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d 838 (Fla.1989).
Sentence vacated; remanded for resen-tencing.