Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jarvis ANDERSON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-03-23
Citations: 463 F. App'x 839
Docket Number: No. 11-11985
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jarvis ANDERSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before BARKETT, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 463
Pages: 839–839

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jarvis ANDERSON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-11985
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
March 23, 2012.
Steven E. Butler, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Gregory A. Bordenkircher, Kenyen Ray Brown, U.S. Attorney, Donna Barrow Dobbins, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Mobile, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
J. Clark Stankoski, Fairhope, AL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before BARKETT, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
J. Clark Stankoski, appointed counsel for Jarvis Anderson in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396,. 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Anderson's convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.