Case Name: Bartlow v. Kinnard
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1882-01
Citations: 38 Ohio St. 373
Docket Number: 
Parties: Bartlow v. Kinnard.
Judges: 
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, New Service
Volume: 38
Pages: 373–374

Head Matter:
Bartlow v. Kinnard.
Motion to dismiss proceeding in error.
On April 21, 1877, George W. Kinnard, defendant in-error, recovered a judgment in the district court of Butler county, against George G. Kinnard, directing the conveyance of real estate. George G. Kinnard, against whom this judgment was rendered, died April 8, 1878.
On December 30, 1880, the plaintiffs in error, heirs at law of George G. Kinnard, deceased, commenced this proceeding in error, alleging that at the date of the death of their ancestor, and ever since, they have been married women.
The ground of this motion is, that more than three years elapsed between the date of the judgment sought to be reversed and the filing of the petition in error.
The question in the case -is, does the disability of the plaintiffs in error, under section 6723 of the Revised Statutes, save the right to prosecute this petition ?
J. O. McKermy, for the motion.
Thomas Millihin, contra.

Opinion:
By the Court.
The right is barred. The time of the statute, having commenced to run during the liftime of the the ancestor, did not stop at his death. 1 Ohio St. 478.
Action dismissed.