Case Name: Patricia BIGGER, et al., Appellants, v. MONROE COUNTY, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1999-05-19
Citations: 731 So. 2d 862
Docket Number: No. 98-1411
Parties: Patricia BIGGER, et al., Appellants, v. MONROE COUNTY, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and JORGENSON and GREEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 731
Pages: 862–862

Head Matter:
Patricia BIGGER, et al., Appellants, v. MONROE COUNTY, Appellee.
No. 98-1411.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 19, 1999.
Angones, Hunter, McClure, Lynch & Williams and Steve Hunter, Miami, for appellants.
Johnson, Anselmo, Murdoch, Burke & George and Bruce Johnson and Christine M. Duignan, Ft. Lauderdale, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and JORGENSON and GREEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Even if, as the appellant contends, the supplemental jury instruction on attractive nuisance was error, there was no theory upon which the appellant could prevail given the facts and circumstances of this case. See Gibson v. Avis Rentr-A-Car Sys., Inc., 386 So.2d 520 (Fla.1980); Tampa Elec. Co. v. Jones, 138 Fla. 746, 190 So. 26 (1939).
Affirmed.