Case Name: TIFFANY & COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. CHRISTINA STARZMAN, RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1937-09-22
Citations: 118 N.J.L. 564
Docket Number: 
Parties: TIFFANY & COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. CHRISTINA STARZMAN, RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 118
Pages: 564–564

Head Matter:
TIFFANY & COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. CHRISTINA STARZMAN, RESPONDENT.
Submitted May 28, 1937
Decided September 22, 1937.
For the appellant, Edwards, Smith & Dawson.
For the respondent, Harvey A. Lieb, William B. McMichael and Arthur F. Mead.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Case in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.