Case Name: Dominique Muhammad SALAAM-X, a/k/a Alfred D. Clifton, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jim PENDERGRAPH; N. Carter, Deputy Sheriff, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-06-19
Citations: 67 F. App'x 215
Docket Number: No. 03-6559
Parties: Dominique Muhammad SALAAM-X, a/k/a Alfred D. Clifton, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jim PENDERGRAPH; N. Carter, Deputy Sheriff, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 67
Pages: 215–215

Head Matter:
Dominique Muhammad SALAAM-X, a/k/a Alfred D. Clifton, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jim PENDERGRAPH; N. Carter, Deputy Sheriff, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 03-6559.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted June 12, 2003.
Decided June 19, 2003.
Dominique Muhammad Salaam-X, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Dominique Muhammad Salaam-X appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Salaam-X v. Pendergraph, No. CA-03-37-3-MU-02 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 18, 2003). We deny Salaam-X's motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.