Case Name: Ed HARROP and Thelma Harrop, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Mr. and Mrs. Robert CAMPBELL, husband and wife, and Steven Campbell, Defendants-Respondents
Court: Idaho Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Idaho
Decision Date: 1980-09-26
Citations: 101 Idaho 580
Docket Number: No. 13147
Parties: Ed HARROP and Thelma Harrop, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Mr. and Mrs. Robert CAMPBELL, husband and wife, and Steven Campbell, Defendants-Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Idaho Reports
Volume: 101
Pages: 580–580

Head Matter:
618 P.2d 321
Ed HARROP and Thelma Harrop, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Mr. and Mrs. Robert CAMPBELL, husband and wife, and Steven Campbell, Defendants-Respondents.
No. 13147.
Supreme Court of Idaho.
Sept. 26, 1980.
Steven G. Wood, Pocatello, for plaintiffs-appellants.
James B. Green and Jim D. Pappas, Pocatello, for defendants-respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Plaintiff appellants appeal from a district court summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs' claim for damages. Plaintiff Thelma Harrop was injured while descending the front steps of defendants' home after having made a social and religious visit. The trial court concluded that there were no material issues of fact and, based upon the record presented below, ruled that the plaintiffs were "licensees" as a matter of law, relying on our decision in Wilson v. Bogert, 81 Idaho 535, 347 P.2d 341 (1959). The court further ruled that the defendants "violated no duty owed to plaintiffs."
We affirm. Springer v. Pearson, 96 Idaho 477, 531 P.2d 567 (1975). Costs to respondents.