Case Name: Norman Finkelstein, Appellant, v. B. C. K. Realty Corporation, Respondent; Norman Finkelstein, Appellant, v. B. C. K. Realty Corporation, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1933-01
Citations: 237 A.D. 904
Docket Number: Appeal No. 1; Appeal No. 2
Parties: Norman Finkelstein, Appellant, v. B. C. K. Realty Corporation, Respondent. Norman Finkelstein, Appellant, v. B. C. K. Realty Corporation, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 237
Pages: 904–904

Head Matter:
Norman Finkelstein, Appellant, v. B. C. K. Realty Corporation, Respondent. Norman Finkelstein, Appellant, v. B. C. K. Realty Corporation, Respondent.
(Appeal No. 1)
(Appeal No. 2.)

Opinion:
Order of April 29, 1931, order of February 9, 1932, resettling said order, and judgment of May 22, 1931, unanimously affirmed, without costs. The second amended complaint in substance and in legal effect is identical with the first amended complaint. The first amended complaint was held to be insufficient in law by an order made February 27, 1931, and entered March 12, 1931, from which no appeal was taken. Accordingly, the sufficiency of the second amended complaint is res adjudicata and the question may not be reviewed on an appeal from an order dismissing the second amended complaint. Nor may the question be urged on the appeal from the judgment since the notices of appeal from the judgment do not bring up for review the order of March 12, 1931. Young, Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.