Case Name: Albert WRIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Thomas DARNELL, William Hildreth and Thomas Caunce, Review Committee, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Commodity Stabilization Service, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1963-04-24
Citations: 316 F.2d 737
Docket Number: No. 15081
Parties: Albert WRIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Thomas DARNELL, William Hildreth and Thomas Caunce, Review Committee, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Commodity Stabilization Service, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 316
Pages: 737–737

Head Matter:
Albert WRIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Thomas DARNELL, William Hildreth and Thomas Caunce, Review Committee, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Commodity Stabilization Service, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15081.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
April 24, 1963.
Thomas M. Edwards, Jr., Mt. Sterling, Ky. (Clay & Edwards, Mt. Sterling, Ky., on the brief), for appellant.
Moss Noble, Asst. U. S. Atty., Lexington, Ky. (Bernard T. Moynahan, Jr., U. S. Atty., William A. Watson, Asst. U. S. Atty., Lexington, Ky., on the brief), for appellee.
Before WEICK and O’SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges, and PRETTYMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
THIS CAUSE having come on to be heard upon the record on appeal and the briefs and argument of counsel, and it appearing therefrom that the judgment of the District Court should be affirmed 205 F.Supp. 277,
Now, Therefore, It Is Ordered that the judgment of the District Court be, and the same is, hereby affirmed.