Case Name: Hiram RICHARDSON, Petitioner v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2016-11-30
Citations: 163 A.3d 397
Docket Number: No. 162 EM 2016
Parties: Hiram RICHARDSON, Petitioner v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, Respondent
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 163
Pages: 397–397

Head Matter:
Hiram RICHARDSON, Petitioner v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, Respondent
No. 162 EM 2016
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
November 30, 2016

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 30th day of November, 2016, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Ali, 10 A.3d 282 (Pa. 2010) (explaining that hybrid representation is not permitted). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record.
It is noted that Petitioner's PCRA petition has been pending before the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County for more than two years.
The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to serve a copy of this order on the President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County.