Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Malcolm DOWDY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-04-04
Citations: 223 F. App'x 228
Docket Number: No. 06-7638
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Malcolm DOWDY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 223
Pages: 228–228

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Malcolm DOWDY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-7638.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 29, 2007.
Decided: April 4, 2007.
Malcolm Dowdy, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly Ann Moore, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Malcolm Dowdy appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for modification of his sentence, in which he sought an order from the district court compelling the government to file a Fed. R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion based on his assistance to the government. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Dowdy, No. 5:05-cr-00013-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 23, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.