Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James V. Paternoster, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1988-05-27
Citations: 140 A.D.2d 995
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James V. Paternoster, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 140
Pages: 995–996

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James V. Paternoster, Appellant.

Opinion:
Memorandum: The evidence was sufficient to show that when defendant unlawfully entered the buildings he intended to commit the crime of larceny therein.
The prosecutor's delay in providing defendant with the statements made by the witness did not constitute reversible error because no prejudice to the defense accrued thereby (see, People v Ranghelle, 69 NY2d 56). (Appeal from judgment of Oneida County Court, Murad, J. — burglary, second degree, and other charges.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green and Lawton, JJ.