Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenton Floyd FAST HORSE, Sr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-11-30
Citations: 155 F. App'x 961
Docket Number: No. 04-30287
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Kenton Floyd FAST HORSE, Sr., Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 155
Pages: 961–962

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Kenton Floyd FAST HORSE, Sr., Defendant—Appellant.
No. 04-30287.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 8, 2005.
Decided Nov. 30, 2005.
Stephen F. Peifer, Esq., USPO — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Portland, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Gerald Needham Fax, FPDOR — Federal Public Defender’s Office, Portland, OR, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Kenton Floyd Fast Horse, Sr. appeals the 120-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for aggravated assault of a federal officer in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 111(a)(1) and (b). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
Because appellant was sentenced under the then-mandatory Sentencing Guidelines, and we cannot reliably determine from the record whether the sentence imposed would have been materially different had the district court known that the Guidelines were advisory, we remand to the sentencing court to answer that question, and to proceed pursuant to United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084 (9th Cir. 2005) (en bane). See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez, 419 F.3d 906, 916 (9th Cir.2005) (extending Ameline's limited remand procedure to cases involving non-constitutional Booker error).
REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.