Case Name: ROBERT COLLINS, TRUSTEE, APPELLANT, v. WALTER ALLEN, RESPONDENT; ROBERT COLLINS, TRUSTEE, APPELLANT, v. ABRAHAM SALTZMAN, RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1917-10-12
Citations: 91 N.J.L. 322
Docket Number: 
Parties: ROBERT COLLINS, TRUSTEE, APPELLANT, v. WALTER ALLEN, RESPONDENT. ROBERT COLLINS, TRUSTEE, APPELLANT, v. ABRAHAM SALTZMAN, RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 91
Pages: 322–322

Head Matter:
ROBERT COLLINS, TRUSTEE, APPELLANT, v. WALTER ALLEN, RESPONDENT. ROBERT COLLINS, TRUSTEE, APPELLANT, v. ABRAHAM SALTZMAN, RESPONDENT.
Argued June 28, 1917
Decided October 12, 1917.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 90 N. J. L. 5;
For the appellant, Joseph B. Tyler.
For the respondent, Martin V. Bergen.

Opinion:
Pee Cueiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Gummere in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.