Case Name: In the Matter of Verdell Mack et al., Appellants, v. Latoya Joyner, Respondent, et al., Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2014-08-21
Citations: 120 A.D.3d 415
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Verdell Mack et al., Appellants, v Latoya Joyner, Respondent, et al., Respondent.
Judges: Concur — Manzanet-Daniels, J.E, Richter, Feinman, Clark and Kapnick, JJ.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 120
Pages: 415–415

Head Matter:
(August 21, 2014)
In the Matter of Verdell Mack et al., Appellants, v Latoya Joyner, Respondent, et al., Respondent.
[991 NYS2d 312]

Opinion:
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John W. Carter, J.), entered on or about August 15, 2014, denying the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Upon review of the record, we find that the work product of certain subscribing witnesses was fraudulent. Nonetheless, we do not find, as a matter of law, that the entire designating petition is permeated with fraud (see Matter of Felder v Storobin, 100 AD3d 11, 15 [2d Dept 2012]).
We do not reach respondent's request for affirmative relief as she did not file a notice of appeal.
Concur — Manzanet-Daniels, J.E, Richter, Feinman, Clark and Kapnick, JJ.