Case Name: NOAH'S ARK CHRISTIAN CHILD CARE CENTER, INC. and Strassburger McKenna Gutnick & Potter, Trustee v. ZONING HEARING BOARD OF WEST MIFFLIN v. Borough of West Mifflin and Second Baptist Church of Homestead, Petition of Borough of West Mifflin
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2004-05-04
Citations: 578 Pa. 193
Docket Number: Petition Nos. 569, 570 WAL 2003
Parties: NOAH’S ARK CHRISTIAN CHILD CARE CENTER, INC. and Strassburger McKenna Gutnick & Potter, Trustee v. ZONING HEARING BOARD OF WEST MIFFLIN v. Borough of West Mifflin and Second Baptist Church of Homestead, Petition of Borough of West Mifflin.
Judges: 
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 578
Pages: 193–194

Head Matter:
851 A.2d 831
NOAH’S ARK CHRISTIAN CHILD CARE CENTER, INC. and Strassburger McKenna Gutnick & Potter, Trustee v. ZONING HEARING BOARD OF WEST MIFFLIN v. Borough of West Mifflin and Second Baptist Church of Homestead, Petition of Borough of West Mifflin.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
May 4, 2004.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
AND NOW, this 4th day of May, 2004, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, LIMITED to the follpwing issue:
Whether the Commonwealth Court committed an error of law by failing to follow its own standard of review in appeals of zoning board decisions where the local zoning board made findings of fact and conclusions of law based on substantial evidence of record and the Commonwealth Court improperly substituted its own judgment as a reviewing court in place of the local zoning board as the trier of fact in weighing evidence and making determinations of credibility?
The matter is to be SUBMITTED.