Case Name: Mary V. Amerman, Respondent v. Bertha Deane, Appellant
Court: New York Superior Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1890-04-21
Citations: 26 Jones & S. 582
Docket Number: 
Parties: Mary V. Amerman, Respondent v. Bertha Deane, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Reports of cases argued and determined in the Superior Court of the city of New York
Volume: 58
Pages: 582–582

Head Matter:
Mary V. Amerman, Respondent v. Bertha Deane, Appellant.
Decided April 21, 1890.
Motion for a re-argument.
W. J. Townsend, for respondent. John H. Deane, for appellant.
Before Sedgwick, Ch. J., and Freedman, J. The decision in respect of which the motion was made will be found in 57 N. Y. Superior Court Rep. 175. The motion was denied, the following opinion being delivered.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The opinion written in the case did not by any expression recognize the fact that equity is said to give fuller compensation than is gained by an action at law. That did not affect the substance of the decision which intended to affirm that neither equity or law would give as damages what in reality was not damages. Motion denied with ten dollars costs.