Case Name: In the Matter of Carol Girards, Appellant, v. Board of Education of Garden City et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1976-12-20
Citations: 40 N.Y.2d 1020
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Carol Girards, Appellant, v Board of Education of Garden City et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 40
Pages: 1020–1021

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Carol Girards, Appellant, v Board of Education of Garden City et al., Respondents.
Argued November 18, 1976;
decided December 20, 1976
James J. Brady and. Eugene M. Kaufman for appellant.
Peter J. Mastaglio and Thomas M. Lamberti for respondents.

Opinion:
Order affirmed, without costs (Matter of Anderson v Board of Educ., 38 NY2d 897). There is nothing in this record to suggest that appellant's probationary appointment was terminated for a constitutionally impermissible purpose or in violation of statutory proscription (James v Board of Educ., 37 NY2d 891, 892).
Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke.