Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel THOMAS, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-03-27
Citations: 514 F. App'x 907
Docket Number: No. 12-14496
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel THOMAS, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 514
Pages: 907–908

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel THOMAS, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-14496
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
March 27, 2013.
Peggy Morris Ronca, Shawn P. Napier, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Orlando, FL, Philip R. Lammens, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Oca-la, FL, Robert E. O’Neill U.S. Attorney’s Office Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Harrison T. Slaughter, Jr., Law Offices of Harrison T. Slaughter Jr, Orlando, FL, Thomas C. Ranew, Jr., Thomas C. Ranew, Jr., Silver Springs, FL, Daniel Thomas, Jr., Ocala, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Harrison T. Slaughter, Jr., appointed counsel for Daniel Thomas, Jr., has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Thomas's conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.