Case Name: Sands et al. v. United States; Duncan, Warden v. Henry; King v. Young et al.; Mass et al. v. City of Carlsbad et al.; Bashara v. United States; Searles v. Relic et al.; Williams v. Borg & Warner Automotive Electronics & Mechanical System Corp.; Rodriguez Mendoza v. Scott, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, et al.; Harris v. 7232 Pleasant View Drive; Fanny v. Levy et al.; Rawlins v. Olson et al.; Cazeau, aka LaFleur v. Pennsylvania State Police et al.; Hummer v. United States; Wardlaw v. Burt, Warden; McKenzie v. Weer, Warden; DeGrijze v. Schwartz et al.; Connelly v. Grossman et al.
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1995-03-20
Citations: 514 U.S. 1032
Docket Number: No. 93-9242; No. 94-941; No. 94-1006; No. 94-1018; No. 94-6260; No. 94-6673; No. 94-6825; No. 94-6851; No. 94-6912; No. 94-6916; No. 94-6967; No. 94-7002; No. 94-7036; No. 94-7044; No. 94-7055; No. 94-7066; No. 94-7424
Parties: Sands et al. v. United States, Duncan, Warden v. Henry, King v. Young et al., Mass et al. v. City of Carlsbad et al., Bashara v. United States, Searles v. Relic et al., Williams v. Borg & Warner Automotive Electronics & Mechanical System Corp., Rodriguez Mendoza v. Scott, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, et al., Harris v. 7232 Pleasant View Drive, Fanny v. Levy et al., Rawlins v. Olson et al., Cazeau, aka LaFleur v. Pennsylvania State Police et al., Hummer v. United States, Wardlaw v. Burt, Warden, McKenzie v. Weer, Warden, DeGrijze v. Schwartz et al., Connelly v. Grossman et al.,
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 514
Pages: 1032–1033

Head Matter:
No. 93-9242.
No. 94-941.
No. 94-1006.
Sands et al. v. United States, Duncan, Warden v. Henry, King v. Young et al., Mass et al. v. City of Carlsbad et al., Bashara v. United States, Searles v. Relic et al., Williams v. Borg & Warner Automotive Electronics & Mechanical System Corp., Rodriguez Mendoza v. Scott, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, et al., Harris v. 7232 Pleasant View Drive, Fanny v. Levy et al., Rawlins v. Olson et al., Cazeau, aka LaFleur v. Pennsylvania State Police et al., Hummer v. United States, Wardlaw v. Burt, Warden, McKenzie v. Weer, Warden, DeGrijze v. Schwartz et al., Connelly v. Grossman et al.,

Opinion:
513 U. S. 838;
513 U. S. 364;
513 U. S. 1127;
No. 94-1018.
No. 94-6260.
No. 94-6673.
No. 94-6825.
No. 94-6851.
No. 94-6912.
No. 94-6916.
No. 94-6967.
No. 94-7002.
No. 94-7036.
No. 94-7044.
No. 94-7055.
No. 94-7066.
No. 94-7424.
513 U. S. 1128;
513 U. S. 1115;
513 U. S. 1128;
513 U. S. 1093;
513 U. S. 1094;
513 U. S. 1129;
513 U. S. 1129;
513 U. S. 1130;
513 U. S. 1117;
513 U. S. 1100;
513 U. S. 1131;
513 U. S. 1118;
513 U. S. 1131; and
513 U. S. 1171. Petitions for rehearing denied.