Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher Ray PARRISH, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-03-05
Citations: 559 F. App'x 210
Docket Number: No. 13-8062
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher Ray PARRISH, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 559
Pages: 210–211

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher Ray PARRISH, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-8062.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 27, 2014.
Decided: March 5, 2014.
Christopher Ray Parrish, Appellant Pro Se. Jason Harris Cowley, Evan Rikhye, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Ray Parrish appeals the district court's order denying his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Parrish, No. 5:08-cr-00099-FL-1 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 10, 2013) We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.