Case Name: Joseph A. MESSINA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-06-25
Citations: 563 So. 2d 194
Docket Number: No. 89-992
Parties: Joseph A. MESSINA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: BOOTH and JOANOS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 563
Pages: 194–195

Head Matter:
Joseph A. MESSINA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 89-992.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
June 25, 1990.
Michael E. Allen, Public Defender, and Kathleen Stover, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Gypsy Bailey, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant challenges his sentence on several grounds. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
Appellant's second issue, involving the sentence which might be imposed if appellant were to violate the conditions of his probation, is not ripe for adjudication, and is therefore disregarded.
As to appellant's challenge of the legality of the "probationary split sentence" imposed, we find that we are bound by Poore v. State, 531 So.2d 161 (Fla. 1988).
With regard to appellant's last issue, notwithstanding recent federal decisions, we find that the trial court reversibly erred by imposing court costs on an indigent defendant without giving him notice and an opportunity to be heard, Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984); Clark v. State, 560 So.2d 244 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Adair v. State, 558 So.2d 203 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).
The sentence is AFFIRMED, but the imposition of costs is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED to the trial court for further proceedings.
BOOTH and JOANOS, JJ., concur.
BARFIELD, J., concurs with written opinion.
. See e.g., United, States v. Cooper, 870 F.2d 586 (llth Cir.1989).