Case Name: Arthur C. Milsap et al., Appellants, v. State of New York, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1969-07-08
Citations: 32 A.D.2d 1017
Docket Number: Claim No. 46884
Parties: Arthur C. Milsap et al., Appellants, v. State of New York, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 32
Pages: 1017–1017

Head Matter:
Arthur C. Milsap et al., Appellants, v. State of New York, Respondent.
(Claim No. 46884.)

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims in a highway appropriation case, which was previously remitted by us for appropriate findings (see 32 A D 2d 586, in which the essential facts appear) in accordance with which a supplemental decision of the Court of Claims has been filed. The resulting award of $7,371 has adequate support in the record. While the after value of $53,499 is still substantially greater than any after value testified to, analysis of the decision in light of the factual findings now supplied adequately explains how the court arrived at this figure, the other components of the award being within the range of expert testimony. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Reynolds, J. P., Staley, Jr., Cooke and Greenblott, JJ., concur in memorandum per Curiam; Aulisi, J., not voting.