Case Name: Jean MARDY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-08-09
Citations: 678 So. 2d 451
Docket Number: No. 95-02821
Parties: Jean MARDY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: FRANK and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 678
Pages: 451–452

Head Matter:
Jean MARDY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 95-02821.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Aug. 9, 1996.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and John C. Fisher, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Dale E. Tarpley, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

Opinion:
THREADGILL, Chief Judge.
The appellant, Jean Mardy, challenges his judgment and sentence for armed robbery. We find merit only in his contention that that portion of probation condition (8), which requires him to pay for random drug and alcohol testing, was improperly imposed because it was not orally pronounced at sentencing. Since the payment provision of condition (8) is a special condition which required oral pronouncement, we strike only that portion of condition (8) which relates to payment. Mardy's judgment and sentence are otherwise affirmed.
Accordingly, the instant cause is affirmed in part and stricken in part.
FRANK and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.