Case Name: Terrance AIKENS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2010-01-27
Citations: 25 So. 3d 1283
Docket Number: No. 3D08-2815
Parties: Terrance AIKENS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before RAMIREZ, C.J., and CORTIÑAS, J. and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 25
Pages: 1283–1283

Head Matter:
Terrance AIKENS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D08-2815.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan. 27, 2010.
Clayton R. Kaeiser, Miami, for appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Rolando A. Soler, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before RAMIREZ, C.J., and CORTIÑAS, J. and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
The claim was time-barred, see Hughes v. State, 22 So.3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009). In addition, under the facts of this case, the erroneous use of "and/or" in the jury instruction did not constitute fundamental error, see Garzon v. State, 980 So.2d 1038 (Fla.2008).