Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arthur Paul MOORE, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-02-26
Citations: 56 F. App'x 182
Docket Number: No. 02-7761
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arthur Paul MOORE, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 56
Pages: 182–183

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arthur Paul MOORE, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-7761.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 20, 2003.
Decided Feb. 26, 2003.
Alvin Garnell Matthews, Fayetteville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Douglas Cannon, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Arthur Paul Moore, Jr., a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to deny relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court on the merits absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000); see Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 941, 122 S.Ct. 318, 151 L.Ed.2d 237 (2001). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Moore has not made the requisite showing. See United States v. Moore, Nos. CR-98-93; CA-01-680-1 (M.D.N.C. filed Oct. 16, 2002 & entered Oct. 17, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.