Case Name: Fred Soper, appellee, v. Nebraska Mutual Insurance Company et al., appellees: National American Fire Insurance Company, appellant; Fred Soper, appellee, v. Aetna Insurance Company et al., appellees: National American Fire Insurance Company, appellant; Fred Soper, appellee, v. Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance Company et al., appellees: National American Fire Insurance Company, appellant; Fred Soper, appellee, v. Union Fire Insurance Company et al., appellees: National American Fire Insurance Company, appellant
Court: Nebraska Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Nebraska
Decision Date: 1930-06-12
Citations: 120 Neb. 843
Docket Number: Nos. 27212, 27213, 27214, 27215
Parties: Fred Soper, appellee, v. Nebraska Mutual Insurance Company et al., appellees: National American Fire Insurance Company, appellant. Fred Soper, appellee, v. Aetna Insurance Company et al., appellees: National American Fire Insurance Company, appellant. Fred Soper, appellee, v. Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance Company et al., appellees: National American Fire Insurance Company, appellant. Fred Soper, appellee, v. Union Fire Insurance Company et al., appellees: National American Fire Insurance Company, appellant.
Judges: Heard before Rose, Dean, Good, Thompson, Eberly and Day, JJ.
Reporter: Nebraska Reports
Volume: 120
Pages: 843–843

Head Matter:
Fred Soper, appellee, v. Nebraska Mutual Insurance Company et al., appellees: National American Fire Insurance Company, appellant. Fred Soper, appellee, v. Aetna Insurance Company et al., appellees: National American Fire Insurance Company, appellant. Fred Soper, appellee, v. Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance Company et al., appellees: National American Fire Insurance Company, appellant. Fred Soper, appellee, v. Union Fire Insurance Company et al., appellees: National American Fire Insurance Company, appellant.
Filed June 12, 1930.
Nos. 27212, 27213, 27214, 27215.
Ziegler & Dunn, for appellant.
Bernard McNeny, Stiner & Boslaugh and Edmund P. Nuss, contra.
Heard before Rose, Dean, Good, Thompson, Eberly and Day, JJ.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The above four cases were consolidated by this court and have been briefed and argued together. Each case presents substantially the same questions for consideration. Plaintiff in each case seeks to recover the proceeds of fire insurance policies covering property owned by him on which defendant National American Fire Insurance Company held a mortgage. The district court for Adams county found in favor of plaintiff and the mortgagee has appealed.
We have carefully examined the record and find the same to be free from prejudicial error. The judgment of the district court is therefore
Affirmed.