Case Name: Michelle F. WHITE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2015-05-12
Citations: 461 S.W.3d 848
Docket Number: No. ED 101766
Parties: Michelle F. WHITE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 461
Pages: 848–849

Head Matter:
Michelle F. WHITE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 101766
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Filed: May 12, 2015
Amy E. Lowe, Missouri Public Defender Office, St. Louis, for Appellant.
Adam S. Rowley, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for Respondent.
Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Michelle White (Movant) appeals the denial of her Rule 24.035 motion for postcon-viction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims the motion court clearly erred in denying her post-conviction motion because plea counsel was ineffective for failing to: (1) advise her regarding a potential defense to first-degree robbery; (2) challenge the factual basis of her plea; and (3) properly advise her regarding sentencing.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying post-conviction relief. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).