Case Name: Geotel, Inc., Appellant, v. William Wallace et al., Defendants, and Extebank et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1990-10-16
Citations: 76 N.Y.2d 917
Docket Number: 
Parties: Geotel, Inc., Appellant, v William Wallace et al., Defendants, and Extebank et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 76
Pages: 917–917

Head Matter:
Geotel, Inc., Appellant, v William Wallace et al., Defendants, and Extebank et al., Respondents.
Submitted July 30,1990;
decided October 16, 1990

Opinion:
Motion for leave to appeal as against defendants Extebank and Laventhol and Horwath dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for leave to appeal as against The Stuart James Co. denied.