Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cearful SPEIGHT, a/k/a June, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-06-30
Citations: 328 F. App'x 233
Docket Number: No. 09-6230
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Cearful SPEIGHT, a/k/a June, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 328
Pages: 233–233

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Cearful SPEIGHT, a/k/a June, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 09-6230.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 22, 2009.
Decided: June 30, 2009.
Cearful Speight, Appellant Pro Se. Howard Jacob Zlotnick, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Cearful Speight appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Speight, No. 2:93-cr-00090-RBS-7 (E.D.Va. Sept. 19, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
' AFFIRMED.