Case Name: Andrew Stohl, Jr., respondent, v. Mary Stohl, &c., et al., appellants
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1947-05-15
Citations: 140 N.J. Eq. 107
Docket Number: 
Parties: Andrew Stohl, Jr., respondent, v. Mary Stohl, &c., et al., appellants.
Judges: For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Parker, Bodine, Donges, Hehbr, Colie, Eastwood, Wells, Rafferty, MoGbehan, JJ. 10.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 140
Pages: 107–107

Head Matter:
Andrew Stohl, Jr., respondent, v. Mary Stohl, &c., et al., appellants.
[Submitted February 14th, 1947.
Decided May 15th, 1947.]
Mr. Earl T. Milsop (Mr. Mortimer L. Mahler, of counsel), for the appellants.
Messrs. Feder >& Binder, for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis, and reported at 138 N. J. Eq. 220.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Parker, Bodine, Donges, Hehbr, Colie, Eastwood, Wells, Rafferty, MoGbehan, JJ. 10.
For reversal — Wachenfeld, Dill, Freund, McLean, JJ. 4.