Case Name: Billy McDOWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NUCOR BUILDING SYSTEM, Defendant-Appellee, and John Hutto, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-08-20
Citations: 475 F. App'x 462
Docket Number: No. 12-1399
Parties: Billy McDOWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NUCOR BUILDING SYSTEM, Defendant—Appellee, and John Hutto, Defendant.
Judges: Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 475
Pages: 462–463

Head Matter:
Billy McDOWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NUCOR BUILDING SYSTEM, Defendant—Appellee, and John Hutto, Defendant.
No. 12-1399.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 16, 2012.
Decided: Aug. 20, 2012.
Billy McDowell, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Michelle Guerra, John K. Linker, Jeffrey S. Mayes, Alaniz and Schraeder, Houston, Texas; Nosizi Ralephata, John Smith Wilkerson, III, Turner, Padget, Graham & Laney, PA, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Billy McDowell appeals the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's report and granting summary judgment for Nucor Building System in this employment discrimination case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McDowell v. Nucor Bldg. Sys., No. 3:10-cv-00172-MBS, 2012 WL 714632 (D.S.C. Feb. 29, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.