Case Name: Angel Alfonso CHIRINOS-ESCALA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Harold CLARKE, Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-03-28
Citations: 563 F. App'x 247
Docket Number: No. 13-7847
Parties: Angel Alfonso CHIRINOS-ESCALA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Harold CLARKE, Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 563
Pages: 247–248

Head Matter:
Angel Alfonso CHIRINOS-ESCALA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Harold CLARKE, Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 13-7847.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 11, 2014.
Decided: March 28, 2014.
Angel Alfonso Chirinos-Escala, Appellant Pro Se. Lauren Catherine Campbell, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Angel Alfonso Chirinos-Escala seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demon strating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.
We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Chirinos-Escala has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-ability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.