Case Name: Dayton Bar Association v. Kemper
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1963-11-20
Citations: 175 Ohio St. 285
Docket Number: D. D. No. 38
Parties: Dayton Bar Association v. Kemper.
Judges: Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Griffith and Gibson, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, New Service
Volume: 175
Pages: 285–289

Head Matter:
Dayton Bar Association v. Kemper.
(D. D. No. 38 —
Decided November 20, 1963.)
Mr. Robert B. Womsley and Mr. P. Eugene Smith, for relator.
Mr. R. James Kemper and Mr. Sidney Kusworm, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Upon oral argument in this court, defense counsel suggested that respondent might be mentally ill. No suggestion of mental illness was made during the hearings before the board and no proof was offered tending to establish such fact. Prom a consideration of the record, this court is of the opinion that the board was neither in error nor unreasonable in its findings and recommendation. Although respondent was not personally present during the oral argument in this court, he testified at the hearing before the board and was represented by counsel at the hearing on the merits and on the objections to the recommendations of the board.
Report confirmed and judgment accordingly.
Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O'Neill, Griffith and Gibson, JJ., concur.