Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Denard Darnell NEAL, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-01-10
Citations: 263 F. App'x 572
Docket Number: No. 07-16775
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Denard Darnell NEAL, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 263
Pages: 572–573

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Denard Darnell NEAL, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 07-16775.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 7, 2008 .
Filed Jan. 10, 2008.
Ann Birmingham Scheel, Esq., USPXOffice of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Denard Darnell Neal, USPA-U.S. Penitentiary, Atwater, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, SILVERMAN and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
A review of the record and appellant's response to the court's order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's order denying appellant's post-judgment motion for release.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.