Case Name: ARROW AIRWAYS, Inc., et al., petitioners v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1950-06-05
Citations: 182 F.2d 705
Docket Number: No. 10495
Parties: ARROW AIRWAYS, Inc., et al., petitioners v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, respondent.
Judges: Before CLARK, BAZELON, and FAHY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 182
Pages: 705–705

Head Matter:
ARROW AIRWAYS, Inc., et al., petitioners v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, respondent.
No. 10495.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued April 18, 1950.
Decided June 5, 1950.
Mr. Dayton M. Harrington, Washington, D. C., for petitioners.
Mr. James D. Graham, Jr., Washington, D. C., also entered an appearance for petitioners.
Mr. O. D. Ozment, Attorney, Civil Aeronautics Board, Washington, D. G, with ■whom Messrs. Emory T. Nunneley, Jr., General Counsel, Civil Aeronautics Board and John H. Wanner, Associate General Counsel, Civil Aeronautics Board, Washington, D. G, were on the brief, for respondent.
Before CLARK, BAZELON, and FAHY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner seeks direct, review in this court of certain regulations of general applicability and prospective effect issued by the Civil Aeronautics Board. The statute governing review of orders of the Civil Aeronautics Board is not sufficiently different from that in the Natural Gas Act to warrant our distinguishing this from United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power Commission, 86 U.S.App.D.C. -, 181 F.2d 796. What we said there with regard to the conditions necessary for our review of administrative action, and the availability of other remedies, is also applicable here.
Dismissed.
. The pertinent regulations of the Civil Aeronautics Board are found in the Board's order dated November 4, 1949, which adopted Amendment No. 1 to Part 242, and Amendment No. 2 to Part 291, Economic Regulations, Civil Aeronautics Board, Regulations Serial No. ER-154 and ER-153. They deal generally with the relations between ticket agents and irregular air carriers. ER-154 prescribes the form of tiekets to be used by large irregular carriers, requires that agreements with ticket agents in regard to passenger traffic be reduced to writing, etc. It also> provides that the exemption heretofore given large irregular carriers will not be available to the extent that such carriers transport passengers obtained in disregard of such requirements. ER-153 requires the filing with the Board of all contracts entered into between carriers and ticket agents.
. 49 U.S.O.A. § 646.
. 15 U.S.C.A. § Wr(b).