Case Name: Ruth Ann BLANKENSHIP, et al., Petitioners, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-02-15
Citations: 556 So. 2d 1108
Docket Number: No. 74176
Parties: Ruth Ann BLANKENSHIP, et al., Petitioners, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: EHRLICH, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, barkett, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 556
Pages: 1108–1109

Head Matter:
Ruth Ann BLANKENSHIP, et al., Petitioners, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 74176.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Feb. 15, 1990.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Lawrence D. Shearer, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for petitioners.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and David R. Gemmer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have for review Blankenship v. State, 545 So.2d 908, 908 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989), to answer the following certified question:
DOES SECTION 893.13, FLORIDA STATUTES (1987) VIOLATE THE ONE SUBJECT RULE OF THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION?
We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We have answered this question in the negative in Burch v. State, 558 So.2d 1 (Fla.1990). We approve the decision below.
It is so ordered.
EHRLICH, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, barkett, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.