Case Name: Guillermo FUNDORA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-02-12
Citations: 573 So. 2d 454
Docket Number: No. 90-1669
Parties: Guillermo FUNDORA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and GERSTEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 573
Pages: 454–454

Head Matter:
Guillermo FUNDORA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 90-1669.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 12, 1991.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Harvey J. Sepler, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Joan L. Greenberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and GERSTEN, JJ.

Opinion:
ON CONFESSION OF ERROR
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the state's confession of error and our review of the record, the defendant's conviction for trafficking is reversed for a new trial because of the fundamental error involved in the trial court's failure to instruct the jury on the material and disputed elements of intent and knowledge. See State v. Dominguez, 509 So.2d 917 (Fla.1987); Williams v. State, 400 So.2d 542 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1149, 103 S.Ct. 793, 74 L.Ed.2d 998 (1983).