Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Frederick Earl Walker, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1988-12-23
Citations: 145 A.D.2d 937
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Frederick Earl Walker, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 145
Pages: 937–937

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Frederick Earl Walker, Appellant.

Opinion:
— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We agree with the hearing court that the complainant had ample opportunity to observe the defendant and thus had an independent basis for his identification, untainted by any suggestive identification at a showup (see, People v Ramos, 42 NY2d 834; People v Koberstein, 103 AD2d 1021, affd 66 NY2d 989). (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Celli, J. — robbery, second degree.) Present— Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Green, Balio and Lawton, JJ.