Case Name: Marge IANNUCCI, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Michael A. Iannucci, Plaintiff, v. RITE AID CORPORATION, et al, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-02-28
Citations: 512 F. App'x 365
Docket Number: No. 12-2332
Parties: Marge IANNUCCI, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Michael A. Iannucci, Plaintiff, v. RITE AID CORPORATION, et al, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 512
Pages: 365–365

Head Matter:
Marge IANNUCCI, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Michael A. Iannucci, Plaintiff, v. RITE AID CORPORATION, et al, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 12-2332.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 26, 2013.
Decided: Feb. 28, 2013.
Marge Iannucci, Appellant Pro Se. Beth A. Moeller, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, PC, Atlanta, Georgia; Michael Lawrence Wade, Jr., Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, PC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Marge Iannucci appeals the district court's order entering judgment in her employment discrimination action in accordance with the Defendant's Fed. R.Civ.P. 68 offer and dismissing the remainder of the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. She also appeals the order compelling discovery and entering a confidentiality order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Iannucci v. Rite Aid Corp., No. 1:11-cv-00281-MRDLH (W.D.N.C. July 24 & Oct. 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.