Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Anthony Torres, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2009-12-22
Citations: 68 A.D.3d 1142
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Torres, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 68
Pages: 1142–1143

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Torres, Appellant.
[892 NYS2d 156]

Opinion:
It is well settled that the right of a defendant to withdraw a previously entered plea of guilty rests within the sound discretion of the sentencing court (see People v Seeber, 4 NY3d 780 [2005]; People v Mann, 32 AD3d 865 [2006]; People v Kucharczyk, 15 AD3d 595 [2005]), and that determination will generally not be disturbed absent an improvident exercise of discretion (see People v DeLeon, 40 AD3d 1008 [2007]). In this case, the record reveals that the defendant entered his plea of guilty knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently, having reached a favorable plea bargain with the assistance of competent counsel with whose representation the defendant was satisfied (see People v Mann, 32 AD3d 865 [2006]). Furthermore, contrary to the defendant's arguments on appeal, "[a]n attorney assigned to represent a defendant in a criminal case has no duty to participate in a baseless pro se motion to withdraw a plea of guilty which was voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently made" (People v Caple, 279 AD2d 635, 635 [2001]; see People v Rodriguez, 181 AD2d 643 [1992]; People v Glasper, 151 AD2d 692, 693 [1989]).
The defendant's remaining contention is without merit. Dillon, J.P, Miller, Eng, Hall and Sgroi, JJ., concur.