Case Name: Eric E. MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-10-03
Citations: 669 F. App'x 113
Docket Number: No. 16-1102
Parties: Eric E. MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 669
Pages: 113–114

Head Matter:
Eric E. MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 16-1102
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: August 26, 2016
Decided: October 3, 2016
Eric E. Miller, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Eric E. Miller seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing his civil complaint without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). This court' may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 387 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Miller seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an ap-pealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Goode v. Central Va. Legal Aid Soci. Inc., 807 F.3d 619 (4th Cir. 2015). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and remand the case to the district court with instructions to allow Miller to file an amended complaint. The motions to amend the complaint and to order a reparative injunction are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED AND REMANDED