Case Name: Manning, Appellant, v. Alexander, Supt., Appellee
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1990-04-11
Citations: 50 Ohio St. 3d 127
Docket Number: No. 89-1774
Parties: Manning, Appellant, v. Alexander, Supt., Appellee.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Re snick, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 50
Pages: 127–127

Head Matter:
Manning, Appellant, v. Alexander, Supt., Appellee.
[Cite as Manning v. Alexander (1990), 50 Ohio St. 3d 127.]
(No. 89-1774
Submitted February 6, 1990
Decided April 11, 1990.)
Paul R. Manning, pro se.

Opinion:
The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed based on our decision in In re Petition of Brown (1990), 49 Ohio St. 3d 222, 551 N.E. 2d 954, in which we held that appeal to this court pursuant to Section 2(B)(2)(a)(iii) of Article IV of the Ohio Constitution is
an adequate remedy at law to pursue a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel and that such actions may not be maintained in habeas corpus.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Re snick, JJ., concur.