Case Name: Ronald DURHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-04-17
Citations: 365 S.W.3d 603
Docket Number: No. WD 73597
Parties: Ronald DURHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before JAMES M. SMART, JR., P.J, VICTOR C. HOWARD, and THOMAS H. NEWTON, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 365
Pages: 603–604

Head Matter:
Ronald DURHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 73597.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
April 17, 2012.
Mark Grothoff, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.
Karen Kramer, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before JAMES M. SMART, JR., P.J, VICTOR C. HOWARD, and THOMAS H. NEWTON, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Mr. Ronald Durham appeals the denial of a Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief motion. He claims that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to properly advise him of the constitutional right to testify and failing to object to improper evidence of prior, uncharged misconduct.
For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).