Case Name: Rouhoullah Kalimian, Plaintiff, v. MTM Associates et al., Respondents, and Soho Oasis, Inc., Intervenor-Defendant; M&A Oasis, Inc., Appellant, v. MTM Associates et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2001-05-10
Citations: 96 N.Y.2d 822
Docket Number: 
Parties: Rouhoullah Kalimian, Plaintiff, v MTM Associates et al., Respondents, and Soho Oasis, Inc., Intervenor-Defendant. M&A Oasis, Inc., Appellant, v MTM Associates et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 96
Pages: 822–822

Head Matter:
Rouhoullah Kalimian, Plaintiff, v MTM Associates et al., Respondents, and Soho Oasis, Inc., Intervenor-Defendant. M&A Oasis, Inc., Appellant, v MTM Associates et al., Respondents.
Submitted March 19, 2001;
decided May 10, 2001

Opinion:
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution (see, Burke v Crosson, 85 NY2d 10, 17-18, n 5).