Case Name: Jonathan Church and Daniel Rayner, administrators of the estate of James Rayner, deceased, plaintiff in error v. Gillman Jewett and Samuel Bailey, administrators, and Mary Bailey, administratrix, of William Alexander, deceased, defendants in error
Court: Illinois Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Illinois
Decision Date: 1832-12
Citations: 1 Scam. 55
Docket Number: 
Parties: Jonathan Church and Daniel Rayner, administrators of the estate of James Rayner, deceased, plaintiff in error v. Gillman Jewett and Samuel Bailey, administrators, and Mary Bailey, administratrix, of William Alexander, deceased, defendants in error.
Judges: 
Reporter: Illinois Reports
Volume: 2
Pages: 55–55

Head Matter:
Jonathan Church and Daniel Rayner, administrators of the estate of James Rayner, deceased, plaintiff in error v. Gillman Jewett and Samuel Bailey, administrators, and Mary Bailey, administratrix, of William Alexander, deceased, defendants in error.
Error to Monroe.
A judgment for costs cannot be rendered against an administrator in his personal character.
J. Semple, for the plaintiffs in error.
S. McRoberts, for the defendants in error.

Opinion:
Smith, Justice,
delivered the opinion of the Court:
Various causes have been assigned for error in this case. After an attentive examination of them, it is not perceived that any of them are tenable, but the last; and that regards the form of the judgment. It is a judgment for costs against the plaintiffs in the Circuit Court, in their personal character. This is manifestly erroneous. The judgment of the Circuit Court is reversed and modified here, so as to affect the plaintiffs only in their representative character as administrators.
Judgment reversed.