Case Name: William P. HALEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. W. Randolph NICHOLS, Superintendent, Chesapeake Public Schools, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-06-04
Citations: 228 F. App'x 260
Docket Number: No. 06-2256
Parties: William P. HALEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. W. Randolph NICHOLS, Superintendent, Chesapeake Public Schools, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 228
Pages: 260–261

Head Matter:
William P. HALEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. W. Randolph NICHOLS, Superintendent, Chesapeake Public Schools, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 06-2256.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 31, 2007.
Decided: June 4, 2007.
William P. Haley, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Jon Barry, David John Sullivan, Kaufman & Cañóles, PC, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
William P. Haley appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Haley v. Nichols, No. 2:06-cv-00361-RAJ (E.D. Va. Oct. 4 & 27, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.