Case Name: The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. David Adam COHEN, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-07-21
Citations: 601 So. 2d 316
Docket Number: No. 91-2008
Parties: The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. David Adam COHEN, Appellee.
Judges: Before NESBITT, COPE and LEVY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 601
Pages: 316–316

Head Matter:
The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. David Adam COHEN, Appellee.
No. 91-2008.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 21, 1992.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Leslie Schreiber, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Harvey J. Sepler, Asst. Public Defender, for appellee.
Before NESBITT, COPE and LEVY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellant argues that the trial court's failure to provide written reasons to justify a sentence that departed downward from the sentencing guidelines requires the case to be remanded to the trial court for sentencing within the guidelines.
Based upon the appellee's correct acknowledgment that the trial court failed to enter the required written reasons for the downward departure, this case is remanded to the trial court for the purpose of allowing the defendant to either withdraw his pleas of guilty or to be resentenced within the sentencing guidelines.
Reversed and remanded with directions.