Case Name: TRAVELERS COMMERCIAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. MARK H. SIELFLEISCH ROOFING CO., INC., and MHS Roofing Maintenance and Repair, Inc., Defendants/Appellants
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2011-12-27
Citations: 355 S.W.3d 569
Docket Number: No. ED 96179
Parties: TRAVELERS COMMERCIAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. MARK H. SIELFLEISCH ROOFING CO., INC., and MHS Roofing Maintenance and Repair, Inc., Defendants/Appellants.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and ROY L. RICHTER, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 355
Pages: 569–569

Head Matter:
TRAVELERS COMMERCIAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. MARK H. SIELFLEISCH ROOFING CO., INC., and MHS Roofing Maintenance and Repair, Inc., Defendants/Appellants.
No. ED 96179.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Dec. 27, 2011.
Robert J. Selsor, Katherine R. Jones, Polsinelli Shughart PC, St. Louis, MO, for appellants.
John A. Michener, Brian R. Shank, Evans & Dixon, L.L.C., St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and ROY L. RICHTER, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendants, Mark H. Sielfleisch Roofing Co., Inc., and MHS Roofing Maintenance and Repair, Inc., appeal from the entry of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff, Travelers Commercial Casualty Company. No error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).