Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Robert W. Brooks, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1998-10-05
Citations: 254 A.D.2d 298
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert W. Brooks, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 254
Pages: 298–299

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert W. Brooks, Appellant.
[678 NYS2d 279]

Opinion:
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Pitts, J.), rendered April 26, 1995, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, the resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the jury, which saw and heard the witnesses (see, People v Gaimari, 176 NY 84). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record (see, People v Garafolo, 44 AD2d 86, 88). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).
The defendant's sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
The defendant's remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are without merit. Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.