Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Askia COLEMAN, Appellant; Askia J. COLEMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-08-29
Citations: 905 S.W.2d 122
Docket Number: Nos. 65770, 67602
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Askia COLEMAN, Appellant. Askia J. COLEMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and WHITE, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 905
Pages: 122–123

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Askia COLEMAN, Appellant. Askia J. COLEMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 65770, 67602.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Aug. 29, 1995.
Deborah B. Wafer, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Cheryl A. Caponegro, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and WHITE, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals the judgment entered after his conviction by jury of delivery of a controlled substance. Defendant argues the trial court erred by overruling his motion to disclose the identity of a confidential informant. We have reviewed the briefs, legal file and transcript and find the trial court did not abuse its discretion. Defendant also appeals the dismissal of his Rule 29.15 motion because it was not timely filed. The motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgments are affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).