Case Name: TAMTON ENTERPRISES, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. TAXATION DIVISION DIRECTOR, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1984-03-26
Citations: 6 N.J. Tax 347
Docket Number: 
Parties: TAMTON ENTERPRISES, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. TAXATION DIVISION DIRECTOR, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Tax Court Reports
Volume: 6
Pages: 347–347

Head Matter:
TAMTON ENTERPRISES, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. TAXATION DIVISION DIRECTOR, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued March 14, 1984
Decided March 26, 1984.
Before Judges FRITZ, FURMAN and DEIGHAN.
David W. Mills, argued the cause for appellant (Lowenstein, Sandler, Brochin, Kohl, Fisher, Boylan & Meanor, attorneys; Susan A. Feeney and David W. Mills on the brief; Robert A. Reilert, attorney).
Maureen Adams, Deputy Atty. Gen., argued the cause for respondent (Irwin I. Kimmelman, Atty. Gen., attorney; Deborah T. Poritz, Deputy Atty. Gen., of counsel).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm substantially for the reasons stated by Judge Lario in his opinion published at 5 N.J.Tax 209 (1983).