Case Name: FREED v. BANK OF AURORA
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1925-10-20
Citations: 113 Okla. 186
Docket Number: No. 16669
Parties: FREED v. BANK OF AURORA.
Judges: 
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 113
Pages: 186–186

Head Matter:
FREED v. BANK OF AURORA.
No. 16669
Opinion Filed Oct. 20, 1925.
Rogers & Jones, for plaintiff in error.
C. A. Steele and W. A. Daugherty, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This case is appealed from the district court of Tulsa county, and defendant in error moves to dismiss on the ground that case-made was not served within the time provided by statute, nor within any valid extension of time. Judgment was rendered on the 7th day of February, 1925, and plaintiff in error gave notice of appeal and was allowed 30 days from date in which to serve case-made, which expired on the 9th day of March, 1925. On the 10th day of March, 1925, the time was extended 20 days, and after other extensions, case-made was finally served on the 6th day of August, 1925.
The order of March 10th is void and casgmade' is nullity, and this court without jurisdiction' to review the appeal. Hoggard v. Conservative Loan Company, 101 Okla. 14, 222 Pac. 674.
The appeal is dismissed.