Case Name: Howard Gooch, Appellant, v. Ronald Shapiro et al., Respondents. (Action No. 1.); Jane Holinko et al., Appellants, v. Ronald Shapiro, Respondent. (Action No. 2.); Adam Orzuchowski, Appellant, v. Ronald Shapiro, Respondent. (Action No. 3.)
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1959-05-28
Citations: 6 N.Y.2d 840
Docket Number: 
Parties: Howard Gooch, Appellant, v. Ronald Shapiro et al., Respondents. (Action No. 1.) Jane Holinko et al., Appellants, v. Ronald Shapiro, Respondent. (Action No. 2.) Adam Orzuchowski, Appellant, v. Ronald Shapiro, Respondent. (Action No. 3.)
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 6
Pages: 840–840

Head Matter:
Howard Gooch, Appellant, v. Ronald Shapiro et al., Respondents. (Action No. 1.) Jane Holinko et al., Appellants, v. Ronald Shapiro, Respondent. (Action No. 2.) Adam Orzuchowski, Appellant, v. Ronald Shapiro, Respondent. (Action No. 3.)
Submitted May 25, 1959;
decided May 28, 1959.

Opinion:
Motion by appellant Orzuchowski for leave to prosecute appeal as a poor person and for assignment of counsel granted and Norman C. Harlowe, Esq., of 320 Broadway, New York City, assigned as counsel to appellant Orzuchowski on the appeal herein.