Case Name: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Patricia FRUETEL, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-12-16
Citations: 629 So. 2d 102
Docket Number: No. 81165
Parties: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Patricia FRUETEL, Respondent.
Judges: BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 629
Pages: 102–103

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Patricia FRUETEL, Respondent.
No. 81165.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Dec. 16, 1993.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Joan Fowler, Sr. Asst. Atty. Gen., Criminal Law and Don M. Rogers, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for petitioner.
Anthony C. Musto, Miami, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We review the decision of the district court of appeal in Fruetel v. State, 609 So.2d 697 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), on the jurisdictional ground of certified conflict. Art. Y, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.
The decision under review is quashed on the authority of Munoz v. State, 629 So.2d 90 (Fla.1993), and the case is remanded to the district court for reconsideration in light of our opinion in Munoz.
It is so ordered.
BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.