Case Name: WOODSON MILL & ELEVATOR COMPANY et al. v. BURRUS MILL & ELEVATOR COMPANY
Court: Texas Courts of Civil Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1933-02-03
Citations: 57 S.W.2d 945
Docket Number: No. 1046
Parties: WOODSON MILL & ELEVATOR COMPANY et al. v. BURRUS MILL & ELEVATOR COMPANY.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 57
Pages: 945–945

Head Matter:
WOODSON MILL & ELEVATOR COMPANY et al. v. BURRUS MILL & ELEVATOR COMPANY.
No. 1046.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Eastland.
Feb. 3, 1933.
Rehearing Denied March 10, 1933.
Goggans & Allison, of Dallas, P. B. Carroll, of Spearman, and D. T. Bowles, of Breckenridge, for appellants.
E. S. Cummings, of Abilene, for appellee.

Opinion:
LESLIE, Justice.
This is a companion case to that of Wood-son Mill & Elevator Company et al. v. Graham Mill & Elevator Company (No. 1045) 57 S.W.(2d) 943, this day decided by this court 'by written opinion therein. In substance the two suits are alike, the Graham Mill & Elevator Company being plaintiff below in 1045, and the Burrus Mill & Elevator Company plaintiff below in 1046. Both suits are against the Woodson Mill & Elevator Company for the purchase price of goods, wares, and merchandise sold to the Woodson Mill & Elevator Company under similar circumstances. The same propositions of law appear in the brief for the appellant in each of the two cases, and except as noted the records are substantially the same.
We make the same disposition of each proposition of law in this case as in 1045. The conclusion is that the judgment of the trial court in the instant case is correct and ought to be affirmed in accordance with our opinion in cause No. 1045. It is so ordered.