Case Name: Chad BROWN, Employee/Respondent, v. CITY OF COTTLEVILLE, Employer/Appellant. and Division of Employment Security, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2014-06-24
Citations: 442 S.W.3d 138
Docket Number: No. ED 100654
Parties: Chad BROWN, Employee/Respondent, v. CITY OF COTTLEVILLE, Employer/Appellant. and Division of Employment Security, Respondent.
Judges: Before LISA S. VAN AMBURG, P.J., PATRICIA L. COHEN., J., and ROY L. RICHTER, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 442
Pages: 138–139

Head Matter:
Chad BROWN, Employee/Respondent, v. CITY OF COTTLEVILLE, Employer/Appellant. and Division of Employment Security, Respondent.
No. ED 100654.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District.
June 24, 2014.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 28, 2014.
Application for Transfer Denied Sept. 30, 2014.
David Hamilton, St. Charles, MO, for Appellant.
Chad Brown, Cottleville, MO, pro se.
Bart Matanic, Jefferson City, for Division of Employment Security.
Before LISA S. VAN AMBURG, P.J., PATRICIA L. COHEN., J., and ROY L. RICHTER, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Employer City of Cottleville, Missouri, ("Cottleville") appeals the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission ("Commission") determining that employee Chad Brown is eligible for unemployment benefits. The Commission rejected Cot-tleville's claim that Brown was terminated for misconduct connected to work. We affirm the Commission's order.
No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).