Case Name: Pittsburgh & Allegheny Telephone Co. v. Stinson Printing Co., Appellant
Court: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1923-07-12
Citations: 81 Pa. Super. 215
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 3
Parties: Pittsburgh & Allegheny Telephone Co. v. Stinson Printing Co., Appellant.
Judges: Before Porter, Henderson, Trexler, Keller, Linn and Gawthrop, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania Superior Court Reports
Volume: 81
Pages: 215–216

Head Matter:
Pittsburgh & Allegheny Telephone Co. v. Stinson Printing Co., Appellant.
Practice, Superior Court — Appeals — Divided court — Affirmance of lower court.
Where the appellant court is equally divided the judgment of the lower court will be affirmed.
Argued April 23, 1923.
Appeal, No. 3, April T., 1923, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Allegheny County, Jan. T., 1922, No. 2424, in favor of plaintiff in the case of Pittsburgh & Allegheny Telephone Company v. Stinson Printing Company.
Before Porter, Henderson, Trexler, Keller, Linn and Gawthrop, JJ.
Affirmed.
Assumpsit to recover charges for telephone service. Before McFarlane, J., without a jury.
The court entered judgment in favor of the plaintiff. Defendant appealed.
Error assigned was the order of the court.
C. F. C. Arensberg, of Patterson, Crawford, Miller & Arensberg, for appellant.
John O. Wicks, of Weller & Wicks, with them C. L. Wallace, for appellee.
July 12, 1923:

Opinion:
Per Curiam,
The six judges who sat at the argument of this case being equally divided in opinion, the judgment is affirmed.