Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Keith COSTELLO, II, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-05-22
Citations: 367 S.W.3d 158
Docket Number: No. ED 96205
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Keith COSTELLO, II, Appellant.
Judges: Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 367
Pages: 158–158

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Keith COSTELLO, II, Appellant.
No. ED 96205.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
May 22, 2012.
Rosalynn Koch, Woodrail Centre, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Daniel N. McPherson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Keith Costello appeals the judgment entered upon a jury's verdict convicting him of one count of first-degree robbery. We find the court did not err in denying Costello's motion to dismiss for violation of his right to speedy trial. In addition, we find the court did not err in excluding evidence of a provision in a witness cooperation agreement allowing the State to require the witness to submit to a polygraph test. Finally, we find the trial court did not err in allowing comments about defense counsel during the prosecutor's closing argument. We affirm.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).