Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rodrigo Alejandro MORALES-PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-04-19
Citations: 445 F.3d 1156
Docket Number: No. 05-10115
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rodrigo Alejandro MORALES-PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before ALFRED T. GOODWIN, DIARMUID F. O’SCANNLAIN, and RICHARD C. TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 445
Pages: 1156–1157

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rodrigo Alejandro MORALES-PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-10115.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
April 19, 2006.
Elizabeth A. Olson, Esq., DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice Civil Division/Appellate Staff, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Rene L. Valladares, Esq., Monique N. Kirtley, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before ALFRED T. GOODWIN, DIARMUID F. O’SCANNLAIN, and RICHARD C. TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
The panel opinion and Judge Tallman's dissent filed on February 22, 2006, are withdrawn. A substitute opinion will issue in due course. The petition for rehearing en banc is denied as moot without preju dice to renewal by either party following issuance of the new opinion.