Case Name: Rafael GONZALEZ, individually and as successor in interest to Adolph Anthony Sanchez Gonzalez, Plaintiff, and F.E.V., a minor, individually and as successor in interest to Adolph Anthony Sanchez Gonzalez, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem David Vasquez; Antoinette Sanchez, individually and as successor in interest to Adolph Anthony Sanchez Gonzalez, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF ANAHEIM; Daron Wyatt; Matthew Ellis, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-10-28
Citations: 733 F.3d 979
Docket Number: No. 11-56360
Parties: Rafael GONZALEZ, individually and as successor in interest to Adolph Anthony Sanchez Gonzalez, Plaintiff, and F.E.V., a minor, individually and as successor in interest to Adolph Anthony Sanchez Gonzalez, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem David Vasquez; Antoinette Sanchez, individually and as successor in interest to Adolph Anthony Sanchez Gonzalez, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF ANAHEIM; Daron Wyatt; Matthew Ellis, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Judge WATFORD did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 733
Pages: 979–980

Head Matter:
Rafael GONZALEZ, individually and as successor in interest to Adolph Anthony Sanchez Gonzalez, Plaintiff, and F.E.V., a minor, individually and as successor in interest to Adolph Anthony Sanchez Gonzalez, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem David Vasquez; Antoinette Sanchez, individually and as successor in interest to Adolph Anthony Sanchez Gonzalez, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF ANAHEIM; Daron Wyatt; Matthew Ellis, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 11-56360.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Oct. 28, 2013.
Gary Steven Bennett, Esquire, Law Offices Of Gary S. Bennett, Laguna Hills, CA, for Plaintiff.
Dale Kristopher Galipo, Esquire, Melanie Tara Partow, Law Offices of Dale K. Galipo, Woodland Hills, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
Moses Wilbur Johnson, Esquire, Anaheim City Attorney’s Office, Anaheim, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
D.C. No. 2:10-cv-04660-PA-SH.

Opinion:
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Judge WATFORD did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.