Case Name: William Harold HORNE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patrick CONROY, Warden; Attorney General for the State of Maryland, Respondents-appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-09-05
Citations: 46 F. App'x 154
Docket Number: No. 02-6672
Parties: William Harold HORNE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patrick CONROY, Warden; Attorney General for the State of Maryland, Respondents-appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 46
Pages: 154–154

Head Matter:
William Harold HORNE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patrick CONROY, Warden; Attorney General for the State of Maryland, Respondents-appellees.
No. 02-6672.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 29, 2002.
Decided Sept. 5, 2002.
William Harold Horne, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
William Harold Horne seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his request for a certificate of appealability to appeal the denial of relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court's order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Horne v. Conroy, No. CA-01-2594 AW (D. Md. filed Apr. 16, 2002 & entered Apr. 17, 2002). We deny Horne's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.