Case Name: PATRICK REHILL ET AL., DEFENDANTS IN ERROR, v. MAYOR, &c., OF EAST NEWARK AND MAYOR, &c., OF JERSEY CITY, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR; NEW JERSEY SUBURBAN WATER COMPANY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. MAYOR, &c, OF EAST NEWARK, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1907-06-17
Citations: 74 N.J.L. 849
Docket Number: 
Parties: PATRICK REHILL ET AL., DEFENDANTS IN ERROR, v. MAYOR, &c., OF EAST NEWARK AND MAYOR, &c., OF JERSEY CITY, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR. NEW JERSEY SUBURBAN WATER COMPANY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. MAYOR, &c, OF EAST NEWARK, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 74
Pages: 849–850

Head Matter:
PATRICK REHILL ET AL., DEFENDANTS IN ERROR, v. MAYOR, &c., OF EAST NEWARK AND MAYOR, &c., OF JERSEY CITY, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR. NEW JERSEY SUBURBAN WATER COMPANY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. MAYOR, &c, OF EAST NEWARK, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR.
Argued March 11, 1907 —
Decided June 17, 1907.
On error to the Supreme Court.
Eor the plaintiffs in error, Robert Carey and Edward Kenny.
Eor the defendants in error, Collins ■& Corbin and Herbert Boggs.

Opinion:
Per, Curiam.
The judgment brought up by this writ is affirmed upon the grounds set forth in the opinion of Mr. Justice Pitney in the Supreme Court, reported in 44 Vroom 220.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Hendrickson, Swayze, Reed, Trenchakd, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Yroom, Green, Gray,.Dill, J.J. 13.
For reversal — None.