Case Name: Phillip WALLACE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Merle D. ROBINSON, Zenon Symanski, Michael O'Leary and Michael P. Lane, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1991-01-09
Citations: 922 F.2d 409
Docket Number: No. 88-1806
Parties: Phillip WALLACE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Merle D. ROBINSON, Zenon Symanski, Michael O’Leary and Michael P. Lane, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before BAUER, Chief Judge, and CUMMINGS, WOOD, Jr., CUDAHY, POSNER, COFFEY, FLAUM, EASTERBROOK, RIPPLE, MANION, KANNE AND SNEED Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 922
Pages: 409–409

Head Matter:
Phillip WALLACE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Merle D. ROBINSON, Zenon Symanski, Michael O’Leary and Michael P. Lane, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 88-1806.
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Jan. 9, 1991.
Jerold S. Solovy, William A. YonHoene, Jr., and Thomas S. O’Neill, Jenner & Block, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff-appellant and Phillip Wallace, Joliet, Ill., plaintiff-appellant pro se.
Diane Curry Grapsas and Daniel N. Ma-lato, Asst. Attys. Gen., Office of the Atty. Gen., Chicago, Ill., for defendants-appel-lees.
Before BAUER, Chief Judge, and CUMMINGS, WOOD, Jr., CUDAHY, POSNER, COFFEY, FLAUM, EASTERBROOK, RIPPLE, MANION, KANNE AND SNEED Circuit Judges.
. Honorable Joseph T. Sneed, Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation. He did not participate in the en banc consideration of this opinion.

Opinion:
ORDER
On consideration of the petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc and of the response filed thereto in the above-entitled cause, a vote of the active judges of the court was requested. A majority of the judges voted to rehear this case en banc. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that rehearing en banc be, and the same is hereby, GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the opinion entered in this case on September 26, 1990 be, and is hereby, VACATED. This case will be reheard en banc at the convenience of the court.
. Honorable Richard D. Cudahy, Circuit Judge, voted to deny rehearing en banc.