Case Name: James L. ROUDABUSH, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HYLTON, CDUSM, U.S. Marshal Service; D. Lawhorne, Sheriff; Sterns, Chief; Commonwealth Attorney-Alexandria (VA); K. Pedersen, Ausa, Edva; F. Milano, Captain; J. Corey; G. Hunter; Lieutenant M. Josiah; Director, American Correctional Association; C.M. Hilton, USDJ, Edva; Edward Semonian, Circuit Court Clerk; R. Sterns, Deputy, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-03-02
Citations: 635 F. App'x 114
Docket Number: No. 15-7589
Parties: James L. ROUDABUSH, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HYLTON, CDUSM, U.S. Marshal Service; D. Lawhorne, Sheriff; Sterns, Chief; Commonwealth Attorney-Alexandria (VA); K. Pedersen, Ausa, Edva; F. Milano, Captain; J. Corey; G. Hunter; Lieutenant M. Josiah; Director, American Correctional Association; C.M. Hilton, USDJ, Edva; Edward Semonian, Circuit Court Clerk; R. Sterns, Deputy, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WYNN, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 635
Pages: 114–115

Head Matter:
James L. ROUDABUSH, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HYLTON, CDUSM, U.S. Marshal Service; D. Lawhorne, Sheriff; Sterns, Chief; Commonwealth Attorney-Alexandria (VA); K. Pedersen, Ausa, Edva; F. Milano, Captain; J. Corey; G. Hunter; Lieutenant M. Josiah; Director, American Correctional Association; C.M. Hilton, USDJ, Edva; Edward Semonian, Circuit Court Clerk; R. Sterns, Deputy, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15-7589.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 16, 2016.
Decided: March 2, 2016.
James Lester Roudabush, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Before WYNN, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James Lester Roudabush, Jr., appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2012) for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Roudabush v. Hylton, No. 2:15-cv-00376-RBS-TEM (E.D.Va. Sept. 2, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED,