Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mario M. PEGRAM, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-07-01
Citations: 328 F. App'x 164
Docket Number: No. 09-6593
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mario M. PEGRAM, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 328
Pages: 164–164

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mario M. PEGRAM, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-6593.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 22, 2009.
Decided: July 1, 2009.
Mario M. Pegram, Appellant Pro Se. John Staige Davis, V, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Mario M. Pegram appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(e) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Pegram, No. 3:03-cr-00407-REP-1 (E.D.Va. Mar. 12, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.