Case Name: Karen Marie HOLIFIELD, Appellant/Cross-Respondent, v. Larry Noble HOLIFIELD, Respondent/Cross-Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-04-15
Citations: 103 S.W.3d 882
Docket Number: Nos. ED 81229, ED 81230
Parties: Karen Marie HOLIFIELD, Appellant/Cross-Respondent, v. Larry Noble HOLIFIELD, Respondent/Cross-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J. and GLENN A. NORTON, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 103
Pages: 882–882

Head Matter:
Karen Marie HOLIFIELD, Appellant/Cross-Respondent, v. Larry Noble HOLIFIELD, Respondent/Cross-Appellant.
Nos. ED 81229, ED 81230.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
April 15, 2003.
Robert N. Hamilton, Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Michael A. Gross, Alan D. Lobel, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.
Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J. and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Mother, Karen Marie Holifield, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying her motion to modify the decree of dissolution with regard to child support and her motion for contempt for the failure of father, Larry Noble Holifield, to pay child support in conformity with the decree. Father cross-appeals from the trial court's denial of his motion to quash the child support enforcement order in which he sought a refund of monies collected by mother thereunder.
We have reviewed the record on appeal and find that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties, however, have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).