Case Name: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Furtado
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1994-11-23
Citations: 71 Ohio St. 3d 20
Docket Number: No. 94-536
Parties: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Furtado.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 71
Pages: 20–22

Head Matter:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Furtado.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Furtado (1994), 71 Ohio St.3d 20.]
(No. 94-536
Submitted September 21, 1994
Decided November 23, 1994.)
Geoffrey Stem, Disciplinary Counsel, and Sally Ann Steuk, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.
■ Lems E. Williams, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We concur in the findings and recommendations of the board. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for two years with credit given for time served. As a condition to reinstatement, respondent must complete her federal probation. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Wright, J., would also condition respondent's reinstatement upon her full payment of restitution.