Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. STEVEN GUY MOSER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2008-10-01
Citations: 222 Or. App. 519
Docket Number: 040834208; A134916
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. STEVEN GUY MOSER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Sercombe, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 222
Pages: 519–520

Head Matter:
Submitted August 1,
reversed and remanded October 1, 2008
STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. STEVEN GUY MOSER, Defendant-Appellant.
Multnomah County Circuit Court
040834208; A134916
193 P3d 1054
Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, Legal Services Division, and Kenneth A. Kreuscher, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Erika L. Hadlock, Assistant Solicitor General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Sercombe, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant appeals a conviction for possession of a Schedule II controlled substance. On appeal, he argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence that was seized after he consented to a search of his coin pocket, because that consent derived from the exploitation of an unlawful stop, in violation of his rights under Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution. The state concedes that defendant was unlawfully stopped and that his consent was the unattenuated product of the exploitation of that stop. We agree and accept the concession. State v. Rider, 216 Or App 308, 172 P3d 274 (2007), rev allowed, 345 Or 94 (2008).
Reversed and remanded.