Case Name: Yaqub Hameed MUWAKKIL, a/k/a James A. Smith, a/k/a James Smith, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. L.W. HUFFMAN, Regional Director of the Northern Region of the Virginia Department of Corrections (VDOC); Lisa T. Edwards, Warden; David A. Garraghty, Chief Warden; Warden Spence; Unit Manager Everette; Davis, Correctional Officer; Warden Williams, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-02-23
Citations: 122 F. App'x 64
Docket Number: No. 04-7065
Parties: Yaqub Hameed MUWAKKIL, a/k/a James A. Smith, a/k/a James Smith, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. L.W. HUFFMAN, Regional Director of the Northern Region of the Virginia Department of Corrections (VDOC); Lisa T. Edwards, Warden; David A. Garraghty, Chief Warden; Warden Spence; Unit Manager Everette; Davis, Correctional Officer; Warden Williams, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 122
Pages: 64–64

Head Matter:
Yaqub Hameed MUWAKKIL, a/k/a James A. Smith, a/k/a James Smith, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. L.W. HUFFMAN, Regional Director of the Northern Region of the Virginia Department of Corrections (VDOC); Lisa T. Edwards, Warden; David A. Garraghty, Chief Warden; Warden Spence; Unit Manager Everette; Davis, Correctional Officer; Warden Williams, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 04-7065.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 19, 2004.
Decided Feb. 23, 2005.
Yaqub Hameed Muwakkil, Appellant pro se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Yaqub Hameed Muwakkil appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment to Defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. We have carefully reviewed the record and the arguments on appeal, and we find no error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's orders for the reasons stated by the district court. Muwakkil v. Huffman, No. CA-01-570-2 (E.D.Va. Dec. 16, 2002; July 10 & Sept. 30, 2003; May 25, 2004). We deny Muwakkil's motions to stay and for production of documents. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED