Case Name: Claude WILSON, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, Bumby & Stimpson, Inc., and U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co., Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1967-01-04
Citations: 193 So. 2d 613
Docket Number: No. 35704
Parties: Claude WILSON, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, Bumby & Stimpson, Inc., and U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co., Respondents.
Judges: THOMAS, Acting C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 193
Pages: 613–614

Head Matter:
Claude WILSON, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, Bumby & Stimpson, Inc., and U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co., Respondents.
No. 35704.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Jan. 4, 1967.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 2, 1967.
Masterson, Lloyd, Sundberg & Rogers and David T. Henninger, St. Petersburg, for petitioner.
Black, Cobb, Cole & Crotty, Daytona Beach, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date July 21, 1966.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
The petition for attorneys' fees is also denied.
THOMAS, Acting C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, O'CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.