Case Name: Mario McALLISTER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ronald HUTCHINSON; Attorney General of the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-03-27
Citations: 31 F. App'x 267
Docket Number: No. 01-7956
Parties: Mario McALLISTER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ronald HUTCHINSON; Attorney General of the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 31
Pages: 267–267

Head Matter:
Mario McALLISTER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ronald HUTCHINSON; Attorney General of the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 01-7956.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 12, 2002.
Decided March 27, 2002.
Mario McAllister, Appellant Pro Se. Ann Norman Bosse, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Mario McAllister seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See McAllister v. Hutchinson, No. CA-01-1644-S (D.Md. Oct. 23, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.