Case Name: DAVID EUGENE STEWART, Petitioner, v. PSYCHIATRIC SECURITY REVIEW BOARD, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1993-12-29
Citations: 125 Or. App. 576
Docket Number: 87-939; CA A73828
Parties: DAVID EUGENE STEWART, Petitioner, v. PSYCHIATRIC SECURITY REVIEW BOARD, Respondent.
Judges: Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Rossman and Edmonds, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 125
Pages: 576–577

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted November 23,
affirmed December 29, 1993
DAVID EUGENE STEWART, Petitioner, v. PSYCHIATRIC SECURITY REVIEW BOARD, Respondent.
(87-939; CA A73828)
864 P2d 880
Harris S. Matarazzo argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.
Katherine H. Waldo, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.
Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Rossman and Edmonds, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Petitioner seeks review of a February 24,1992, Psychiatric Security Review Board order denying him conditional release. We affirm.
Petitioner was released on March 11, 1992, about two weeks after the order was entered. He points to no collateral consequences at this time resulting from his continued confinement after the February, 1992, order. His petition is moot. See Brumnett v. PSRB, 315 Or 402, 848 P2d 1194 (1993).
We expressly do not decide petitioner's claim that his condition does not constitute a mental disease.
Affirmed.