Case Name: Charles Siedler, App'lt, v. Edward T. Bell et al., Adm'rs, Resp'ts
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1892-07-22
Citations: 47 N.Y. St. Rep. 411
Docket Number: 
Parties: Charles Siedler, App’lt, v. Edward T. Bell et al., Adm’rs, Resp’ts.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 47
Pages: 411–412

Head Matter:
Charles Siedler, App’lt, v. Edward T. Bell et al., Adm’rs, Resp’ts.
(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department,
Filed July 22, 1892.)
Executors and administrators—Accounting—Corporations.
Plaintiff and defendants’ intestate, with others, undertook to form a railroad company, of which intestate acted as treasurer. Plaintiff subscribed for stock, on which he made a payment. In an action against defendants for an accounting it was found that the intestate paid out in furtherance of the enterprise all the money received by him on the sales of stock; that it was done with plaintiff’s knowledge and consent, and that the intestate had accounted for all moneys in his hands to the general manager of the company. Held, that the complaint was properly dismissed.
Appeal from judgment dismissing the complaint with costs.
Henry C. Andrews, for app’lt; W. J. Groo, for resp’ts.

Opinion:
Dykman, J.
—This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment which dismissed his complaint, with costs.
The action was against the administrators of the estate of Henry R. Low, deceased, for an accounting, and it appeared upon the trial that the plaintiff with Low and some others undertook to form a railroad company for the construction of a railroad along the west shore of the Hudson river, and by agreement of the parties Low was to act as treasurer.
He was to proceed with the work of locating the road and procuring the right of way arid pay the expenses of that work from the money received as such treasurer.
The plaintiff, in this action made á subscription for $10,000 of the stock of the new company, and paid $1,000 on account thereof, which went into the hands of Low and was practically all expended for the purposes contemplated.
The trial judge has found that Low paid out and expended all the money received from the plaintiff and other subscribers in, furtherance of the enterprise, and that such disbursements were-made by Low with the knowledge and consent or approval of th& plaintiff, and further that Low had' accounted for all the money which- came to his hands as such treasurer to Delos E. Culver, the-general manager of the proposed company. These findings are-all fully sustained by the evidence, and the judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
Cullen, J., concurs; Barnard, P. J., not sitting.