Case Name: Pauline C. LaBARGE, Appellant, v. Pierre L. LaBARGE, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-09-26
Citations: 30 S.W.3d 193
Docket Number: No. ED 77223
Parties: Pauline C. LaBARGE, Appellant, v. Pierre L. LaBARGE, Respondent.
Judges: Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., and PAUL J. SIMON and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 30
Pages: 193–194

Head Matter:
Pauline C. LaBARGE, Appellant, v. Pierre L. LaBARGE, Respondent.
No. ED 77223.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Sept. 26, 2000.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 30, 2000.
Donald R. Carmody, John E. Hilton, Carmody MacDonald, P.C., Clayton, for Appellant.
Leo V. Garvin, Jr., Paul M. Maloney, Garvin & Maloney, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., and PAUL J. SIMON and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Pauline LaBarge (wife) appeals from an order denying her motion for summary judgment and» granting of Pierre La-Barge's (husband) motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).