Case Name: Francis E. Harrington, Appellant, v. American Woman's Realty Co., Inc., Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1944-06-08
Citations: 182 Misc. 110
Docket Number: 
Parties: Francis E. Harrington, Appellant, v. American Woman’s Realty Co., Inc., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 182
Pages: 110–111

Head Matter:
Francis E. Harrington, Appellant, v. American Woman’s Realty Co., Inc., Respondent.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
June 8, 1944.
Joseph F. Swords for appellant.
James F. Dwyer for respondent.

Opinion:
Memorandum Per Curiam.
.The first, second and fourth defenses are legally insufficient. (Zwang v. A. & P. Food Stores, 181 Misc. 375; Bowles v. American Stores, 139 F. 2d 377.) The third defense is not a complete defense, but may be a partial defense to plaintiff's claim for cumulative damages. (Ward v. Bochino, 181 Misc. 355.)
The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion granted with leave to serve an amended answer within five days after service of order entered hereon upon payment of costs.
Shientag, McLaughlin and Hecht, JJ., concur.
Order reversed, etc.