Case Name: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. HARRY SUCKOW ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1938-04-29
Citations: 120 N.J.L. 190
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. HARRY SUCKOW ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 120
Pages: 190–191

Head Matter:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. HARRY SUCKOW ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR.
Submitted February 11, 1938 —
Decided April 29, 1938.
For the plaintiffs in error, Ward Kremer.
For the defendant in error, T. Raymond Bazley.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Pekskie, Poetee, Heteield, Deae, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeeety, Walked, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.