Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Harry Yolles, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1998-11-18
Citations: 92 N.Y.2d 960
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Harry Yolles, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 92
Pages: 960–961

Head Matter:
[705 NE2d 1201, 683 NYS2d 160]
The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Harry Yolles, Respondent.
Argued October 14, 1998;
decided November 18, 1998
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Michael E. Bongiorno, District Attorney of Rockland County, New City (Ellen O’Hara Woods of counsel), for appellant.
Tracy, Bertolino & Edwards, New City (John S. Edwards of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Term should be affirmed.
Section 180.50 of the Criminal Procedure Law provides a mechanism for reducing charges in a felony complaint to offenses other than felonies. If the prosecutor consents, the local criminal court must first inquire into whether the facts and evidence provide a basis for charging a nonfelony offense (CPL 180.50 [1]). Only if the court is satisfied, after such an inquiry, that there is reasonable cause to believe that the defendant committed a nonfelony offense may the court order the indicated reduction.
As the Village Court acknowledged here, it undertook no inquiry to determine whether the facts surrounding the defendant's conduct warranted reduction of the second degree assault (Penal Law § 120.05) charge to third degree assault (Penal Law § 120.00). With no judicial inquiry prior to the prosecution's filing of the misdemeanor information or before the felony complaint was marked to reflect the reduction in charge, there was no conversion to the misdemeanor charge. The third degree assault charge was therefore properly dismissed.
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick and Wesley concur.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.