Case Name: In the Interest of T.S., K.S., and L.J., minors Juvenile Officer, Petitioner/Respondent, v. A.C.S. and T.M.S., Respondents/Appellants
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-01-11
Citations: 158 S.W.3d 237
Docket Number: Nos. ED 84246, ED 84247
Parties: In the Interest of T.S., K.S., and L.J., minors Juvenile Officer, Petitioner/Respondent, v. A.C.S. and T.M.S., Respondents/Appellants.
Judges: Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 158
Pages: 237–238

Head Matter:
In the Interest of T.S., K.S., and L.J., minors Juvenile Officer, Petitioner/Respondent, v. A.C.S. and T.M.S., Respondents/Appellants.
Nos. ED 84246, ED 84247.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Jan. 11, 2005.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 23, 2005.
John R. Bird, St. Louis, Christopher M. Braeske, Clayton, for appellants.
Barbara L. Greenberg, Clayton, for respondent.
Laroma White, St. Louis, for Guardian Ad Litem.
Philip H. Dennis, Jr., St. Louis, for In-tervenor.
Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Mother and father separately appeal from the trial court's judgments terminating their parental rights to three minor children pursuant to Section 211.447 RSMo (2000). The judgments are supported by substantial evidence and are not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgments are affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
. All statutory references will be to RSMo (2000) unless otherwise indicated.