Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ariel Bannister, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1997-03-10
Citations: 237 A.D.2d 371
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ariel Bannister, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 237
Pages: 371–371

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ariel Bannister, Appellant.
[655 NYS2d 436]

Opinion:
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hanophy, J.), imposed February 26, 1996, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant waived his right to appeal as part of the negotiated plea bargain (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1). In any event, we have considered the defendant's contention that the sentence was harsh and excessive, and find it to be without merit (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Copertino, Sullivan and McGinity, JJ., concur.