Case Name: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Appellant, v. Luke Buffenmyer, Respondent, et al., Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2015-12-31
Citations: 134 A.D.3d 1578
Docket Number: 
Parties: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Appellant, v Luke Buffenmyer, Respondent, et al., Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 134
Pages: 1578–1579

Head Matter:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Appellant, v Luke Buffenmyer, Respondent, et al., Defendant.
[21 NYS3d 921]

Opinion:
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Deborah H. Karalunas, J.), dated October 1, 2014. The order denied plaintiff's motion to restore this action to the court's calender.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: In seeking to restore this foreclosure action to Supreme Court's calendar after it had been dismissed, plaintiff was required to "demonstrate a potentially meritorious cause of action, a reasonable excuse for the delay in prosecuting the action, a lack of intent to abandon the action, and a lack of prejudice to the defendants" (Vaream v Corines, 78 AD3d 933, 933 [2010]). We agree with plaintiff that the order of reference and judgment of foreclosure and sale are sufficient to establish the merit of the action (see GMAC Mtge., LLC v Alfred, 49 Misc 3d 1214[A], 2015 NY Slip Op 51621[U], *1 [Sup Ct, Albany County 2015]). Plaintiff failed, however, to establish a reasonable excuse for its delay (see Okun v Tanners, 11 NY3d 762, 763 [2008]; Sang Seok Na v Greyhound Lines, Inc., 88 AD3d 980, 981 [2011]), lack of intent to abandon the action, or lack of prejudice to defendants (see Sierra R. v Jamaica Hosp. Med. Ctr., 101 AD3d 701, 703 [2012]). Present — Smith, J.P., Peradotto, Lindley, Whalen and DeJoseph, JJ.