Case Name: PAUL MORTIMER, Petitioner, v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1989-05-24
Citations: 96 Or. App. 763
Docket Number: 11-87-166; CA A47029
Parties: PAUL MORTIMER, Petitioner, v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, Respondent.
Judges: Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Newman and Deits, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 96
Pages: 763–764

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted April 26,
fine vacated; otherwise affirmed May 24, 1989
PAUL MORTIMER, Petitioner, v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, Respondent.
(11-87-166; CA A47029)
773 P2d 830
Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.
Douglas F. Zier, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.
Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Newman and Deits, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Petitioner seeks review of a final order of the Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary that found that he had violated a disciplinary rule and imposed, inter alia, a $100 fine. He first argues that there is not sufficient evidence to support the finding that he is guilty. The record contains substantial evidence to support the finding. However, respondent concedes, and we agree, that the fine is invalid. Watson v. OSP, 90 Or App 85, 750 P2d 1188 (1988).
Fine vacated; otherwise affirmed.