Case Name: Edward Russo et al., Appellants, v. Stephen Lupow et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1995-05-30
Citations: 215 A.D.2d 744
Docket Number: 
Parties: Edward Russo et al., Appellants, v Stephen Lupow et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 215
Pages: 744–744

Head Matter:
Edward Russo et al., Appellants, v Stephen Lupow et al., Respondents.
[627 NYS2d 959]

Opinion:
In a legal malpractice action, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), dated February 10, 1993, which denied their motion to compel the production of certain documents.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the plaintiffs' contention, the Supreme Court properly concluded that the requested documents constituted attorney work product and therefore were not subject to discovery (see, CPLR 3101 [c]). Sullivan, J. P., Miller, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.