Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Carl Mitchell, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1993-04-14
Citations: 192 A.D.2d 1137
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carl Mitchell, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 192
Pages: 1137–1137

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carl Mitchell, Appellant.
[596 NYS2d 740]

Opinion:
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We agree with defendant that his purported waiver of appeal was invalid. An appeal waiver was never mentioned at the plea hearing. Although there is no "particular litany" for an effective appeal waiver, a knowing and voluntary waiver cannot be inferred from a silent record (People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 283). Because there was no record discussion between the court and defendant concerning an appeal waiver, the record does not "afford a sufficient basis for concluding that defendant's waiver of his right to appeal was knowing, intelligent or voluntary" (People v Callahan, supra, at 283). We have reviewed defendant's argument that his sentence is harsh and excessive and we conclude that the sentencing court did not abuse its discretion by imposing the maximum sentence. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Doyle, J. — Robbery, 2nd Degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Green, Lawton, Doerr and Boomer, JJ.