Case Name: Smiley James HARRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LAKE COUNTY; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-12-13
Citations: 212 F. App'x 675
Docket Number: No. 05-16084
Parties: Smiley James HARRIS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. LAKE COUNTY; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before: GOODWIN, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 212
Pages: 675–676

Head Matter:
Smiley James HARRIS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. LAKE COUNTY; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
No. 05-16084.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 4, 2006.
Filed Dec. 13, 2006.
Smiley James Harris, Lakeport, CA, pro se.
Clay J. Christianson, Esq., Kelly Jackson Christianson & Smith, Santa Rosa, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: GOODWIN, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Smiley James Harris appeals pro se from the district court's judgment in favor of defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging illegal search, false arrest, malicious prosecution, retaliation, and due process and equal protection violations arising from his arrest for driving without a license and speeding. We review de novo, Johnson v. County of Los Angeles, 340 F.3d 787, 791 (9th Cir.2003). We are not persuaded by Harris' contentions on appeal, and affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's May 9, 2005 order.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.