Case Name: STATE ex rel., YOUNG, Appellant, v. YATES, Respondent
Court: Montana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Montana
Decision Date: 1896-02-24
Citations: 17 Mont. 547
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE ex rel., YOUNG, Appellant, v. YATES, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Montana Reports
Volume: 17
Pages: 547–547

Head Matter:
STATE ex rel., YOUNG, Appellant, v. YATES, Respondent.
[Submitted February 18, 1896.
Decided February 24, 1896.]
Supreme Court— Slrn-t cause calendar — Stipulation.—Where it appears upon tile argument of an appeal, which had been placed upon the short cause calendar, under a stipulation of counsel, that from the importance of the question presented, the case was not, nor could be, fairly presented in the time allowed, it will be remanded to its regular place on the calendar for reargument.
Appeal from, Eighth Judicial District, Cascade County.
Remanded for reargument.
Largent & Hwntoon, Hansom Cooper and Douglas Martin, for Appellant.
Leslie dé Downing, for Respondent.

Opinion:
Pee Cueiam.
The ease was placed Upon the short cause docket by virtue of a stipulation filed by counsél. The stipulation complied with court rule Vil, subd. la. Counsel stipulated that they would argue • the case in fifteen minutes to the side, and that, in their opinion, the case could be fully and fairly presented in said time. The case was argued February 18, 1896; and, upon consultation after the argument, it appears to the court that a decision of the case involves an extremely important and interesting legal and political question. It is the opinion of the court that the importance of the question as presented is such that it could not be' and, indeed, was not fairly presented on the argument.
It is therefore ordered, under rule VII, subd; le, that the case be reargued, and that it take its regular place upon the calendar.