Case Name: Jennafer YELLOWHORSE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KAYENTA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-11-20
Citations: 703 F. App'x 468
Docket Number: No. 17-15688
Parties: Jennafer YELLOWHORSE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KAYENTA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 703
Pages: 468–468

Head Matter:
Jennafer YELLOWHORSE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KAYENTA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 17-15688
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted November 15, 2017
NOVEMBER 20, 2017
Jennafer Yellowhorse, Kayenta, AZ, pro se.
Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument, See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2),

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Jennafer Yellowhorse appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing for failure to state a claim her action alleging various federal claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir. 1998) (order). We affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Yellowhorse's action because Yellowhorse failed to allege facts sufficient to state any plausible claims. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009) ("[A] complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face." (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)),
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.