Case Name: MARMORSTEIN, Appellant, v. HARLAM, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1905-02-23
Citations: 92 N.Y.S. 1133
Docket Number: 
Parties: MARMORSTEIN, Appellant, v. HARLAM, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 92
Pages: 1133–1134

Head Matter:
MARMORSTEIN, Appellant, v. HARLAM, Respondent.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
February 23, 1905.)
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Seventh Dis trict. Action by Joseph Marmorstein against Moses Harlam. From an order setting aside a verdict, plaintiff appeals. Reversed. David Gerber, for appellant^ Maurice B. Blumenthal, lor respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
After a fair trial, involving only controverted questions of fact, the testimony was submitted to the consideration of a jury under an impartial charge to which no valid exception was taken, and a verdict was rendered in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant immediately made a motion to set aside the verdict, which was denied. Subsequently a motion was made by the defendant for a re-argument and rehearing of such motion, and, although it does not appear that such reargument or rehearing was had, the verdict was set aside. A careful examination of the record does not disclose any warrant for the granting of such an order. Order reversed, with costs.