Case Name: Michael E. KENNEDY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHESAPEAKE UTILITIES CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-07-21
Citations: 439 F. App'x 282
Docket Number: No. 11-1230
Parties: Michael E. KENNEDY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHESAPEAKE UTILITIES CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 439
Pages: 282–282

Head Matter:
Michael E. KENNEDY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHESAPEAKE UTILITIES CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 11-1230.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 3, 2011.
Decided: July 21, 2011.
Michael E. Kennedy, Appellant Pro Se. Brian M. Quinn, DLA Piper U.S. LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Michael E. Kennedy appeals the district court's order granting Chesapeake Utilities Corporation's motion to dismiss Kennedy's action alleging violations of the federal Fair Debt Collections Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692-1692p (2006), the Maryland Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, Md.Code Ann., Bus. Reg. § § 7-101 et seq.; Md.Code Ann., Com. Law § 14-201 et seq. (LexisNexis 2005 & Supp.2010), and Maryland common law. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kennedy v. Chesapeake Utilities Corp. No. 1:10-cv-02256-BEL, 2011 WL 846584 (D.Md. Mar. 8, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.