Case Name: Ballariel v. Hoagerhyde, Appellant
Court: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1972-03-24
Citations: 220 Pa. Super. 414
Docket Number: Appeals, Nos. 391 and 392
Parties: Ballariel v. Hoagerhyde, Appellant.
Judges: Before Weight, P. J., Watkins, Montgomery, Jacobs, Hoeeman, and Cer-oone, JJ. (Spaulding, J., absent).
Reporter: Pennsylvania Superior Court Reports
Volume: 220
Pages: 414–415

Head Matter:
Ballariel v. Hoagerhyde, Appellant.
Argued November 10, 1971.
Before Weight, P. J., Watkins, Montgomery, Jacobs, Hoeeman, and Cer-oone, JJ. (Spaulding, J., absent).
Cosmos J. Reale, for appellant.
Jon L. Friedman, with him Friedman, Friedman and Weisman, for appellee.
March 24, 1972:

Opinion:
Opinion by
Hoffman, J.,
This appeal presents the same question which was decided by our Court in Szarmack v. Welch, 220 Pa. Superior Ct. 407, 289 A. 2d 149 (1972). For the reasons given in Szarmack, we hold that Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 4007(a) requires the disclosure of the existence and policy limits of liability insurance coverage.
The order of the court below is affirmed.