Case Name: Fernando RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. KLAISLER MANUFACTURING CORP., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1987-06-09
Citations: 508 So. 2d 500
Docket Number: No. 86-3062
Parties: Fernando RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. KLAISLER MANUFACTURING CORP., Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 508
Pages: 500–501

Head Matter:
Fernando RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. KLAISLER MANUFACTURING CORP., Appellee.
No. 86-3062.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
June 9, 1987.
Haggard & Kirkland, Coral Gables, James C. Blecke, Miami, for appellant.
Pyszka, Kessler, Massey, Weldon, Catri, Holton & Douberley and Malcolm W. Weldon, Cooper, Wolfe & Bolotin and Sharon L. Wolfe and Maureen E. Lefebvre, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The summary judgment from which this appeal is taken is affirmed on the authority of Shaw v. General Motors Corp., 503 So.2d 362 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), and we certify to the Florida Supreme Court the same questions which we certified in Shaw. We find no merit in appellant's argument that there is a genuine issue of material fact as to the date upon which the allegedly defective product was manufactured and sold.
Affirmed.