Case Name: THE McNEAL PIPE AND FOUNDRY COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. CHARLES LIPPINCOTT, COLLECTOR, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1895-11
Citations: 58 N.J.L. 407
Docket Number: 
Parties: THE McNEAL PIPE AND FOUNDRY COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. CHARLES LIPPINCOTT, COLLECTOR, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 58
Pages: 407–407

Head Matter:
THE McNEAL PIPE AND FOUNDRY COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. CHARLES LIPPINCOTT, COLLECTOR, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
On error to the Supreme Court. Eor opinion of the Supreme Court, see 28 Vroom 540.
Eor the plaintiff in error, Howard Flanders and Samuel W. JBeldon.
For the defendant in error, Joseph H. Qashill.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given by that court.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Depue, Gummere, Ludlow, Van Syckel, Bogert, Brown, Smith, Talman. 10.
For reversal—None.