Case Name: Rollan S. STANLEY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2013-05-21
Citations: 399 S.W.3d 499
Docket Number: No. ED 98639
Parties: Rollan S. STANLEY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 399
Pages: 499–499

Head Matter:
Rollan S. STANLEY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri.
No. ED 98639.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District.
May 21, 2013.
Gwenda R. Robinson, St. Louis, MO, for Movant/Appellant.
Mary H. Moore, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent/Respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Rollan S. Stanley appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k); Burston v. State, 343 S.W.3d 691, 693 (Mo.App. E.D.2011). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2012, unless otherwise indicated.