Case Name: George D. Phelps for use of Harry S. Mecartney, Appellant, v. City of Chicago, Appellee
Court: Illinois Appellate Court
Jurisdiction: Illinois
Decision Date: 1913-01-27
Citations: 177 Ill. App. 25
Docket Number: Gen. No. 16,877
Parties: George D. Phelps for use of Harry S. Mecartney, Appellant, v. City of Chicago, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Illinois Appellate Court Reports
Volume: 177
Pages: 25–25

Head Matter:
George D. Phelps for use of Harry S. Mecartney, Appellant, v. City of Chicago, Appellee.
Gen. No. 16,877.
Appeals and errors—former appeal. Where a case comes before court of review the second time and the questions involved are the same, the former decision is binding and the judgment is affirmed.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Jesse A. Baldwin, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1910.
Affirmed.
Opinion filed January 27, 1913.
George A. Mason and Edgar R. Hart, for appellee; Edward J. Brundage, of counsel.
Oliver & Mecartney and Enoch J. Price, for appellant.

Opinion:
Mr. Presiding Justice Smith
delivered the opinion of the court.
This case was before this court on a former appeal and the opinion therein is reported in 150 Ill. App. 281. The situation is the same as that in Mecartney v. City of Chicago, ante, 23, in which an opinion is this day filed. The questions involved were decided on said former appeal against the appellant, and the law there announced is the law of the case on this appeal, and the judgment is therefore affirmed.
Affirmed.