Case Name: Daniel Mark SIEGEL and Associated Students of University of California (A.S.U.C.), Appellants, v. REGENTS OF the UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA et al., Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1971-10-29
Citations: 449 F.2d 788
Docket Number: No. 25262
Parties: Daniel Mark SIEGEL and Associated Students of University of California (A.S.U.C.), Appellants, v. REGENTS OF the UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA et al., Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 449
Pages: 788–788

Head Matter:
Daniel Mark SIEGEL and Associated Students of University of California (A.S.U.C.), Appellants, v. REGENTS OF the UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA et al., Appellees.
No. 25262.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Oct. 29, 1971.
Rehearing Denied Nov. 19, 1971.
Doris Brin Walker (argued), of Treu-haft, Walker & Burnstein, Oakland, Cal., for appellants.
Milton H. Gordon (argued), Thomas J. Cunningham, Berkeley, Cal., for appel-lees.
Paul N. Halvonik, Charles C. Marson, San Francisco, Cal., amici curiae.
Before ELY and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges, and McNICHOLS, District Judge.
The Honorable Ray McNieliols, United States District Judge for the District of Idaho, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Although the issue is close, we hold that the record before us presents a substantial federal question of constitutional stature. Consequently, the judgment of the lower court, 308 F.Supp. 832, is set aside and the cause remanded with instructions to convene a three-judge Court pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2281.
We express no opinion as to the ultimate resolution of the constitutional issues.