Case Name: IN the INTEREST OF A.T. Frederick R. Fremgen, State's Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee v. A.T., a child, D.D., father, Respondents and C.A.M.T., mother, Respondent and Appellant
Court: North Dakota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: North Dakota
Decision Date: 2018-07-31
Citations: 916 N.W.2d 111
Docket Number: No. 20180269
Parties: IN the INTEREST OF A.T.
Judges: 
Reporter: North Western Reporter 2d
Volume: 916
Pages: 111–112

Head Matter:
IN the INTEREST OF A.T.
Frederick R. Fremgen, State's Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee
v.
A.T., a child, D.D., father, Respondents
and
C.A.M.T., mother, Respondent and Appellant
No. 20180269
Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Filed July 31, 2018
Frederick R. Fremgen, State's Attorney, Jamestown, ND, petitioner and appellee (on brief).
Scott R. Sandness, Jamestown, ND, for respondent and appellant, C.A.M.T. (on brief).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
[¶ 1] The mother, C.A.M.T., appeals from a juvenile court order terminating her parental rights in A.T. The juvenile court found the child is deprived, the conditions and causes of the deprivation are likely to continue, and the child is suffering or will probably suffer serious physical, mental, moral, or emotional harm. See N.D.C.C. § 27-20-44(1)(c)(1). The juvenile court also found the child had been in foster care for more than 450 of the previous 660 nights. See N.D.C.C. § 27-20-44(1)(c)(2). The mother argues clear and convincing evidence does not support a finding that the child was deprived, that the conditions and causes of deprivation are likely to continue, or that by reason thereof the child is suffering or will probably suffer serious physical, mental, moral, or emotional harm. The juvenile court's findings are not clearly erroneous, and we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Jerod E. Tufte
Jon J. Jensen
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers