Case Name: Albert R. SALMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF NEVADA COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-12-27
Citations: 23 F. App'x 838
Docket Number: No. 00-17324; D.C. No. CV-99-00659-JLQ
Parties: Albert R. SALMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF NEVADA COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 23
Pages: 838–838

Head Matter:
Albert R. SALMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF NEVADA COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 00-17324.
D.C. No. CV-99-00659-JLQ.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 17, 2001 .
Decided Dec. 27, 2001.
Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, TROTT and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Albert R. Salman appeals pro se the district court's orders dismissing his civil rights action alleging that the State of Nevada Commission on Judicial Discipline and various state defendants denied him due process and equal protection of the laws by not allowing him to attend one of the Commission's meetings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We dismiss the appeal because Salman has failed to pay sanctions imposed by this court in prior appeals found to be frivolous. See Hymes v. United States, 993 F.2d 701, 702 (9th Cir.1993) (order).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.