Case Name: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Petitioner v. Francis GALDO, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2018-10-02
Citations: 194 A.3d 1043
Docket Number: No. 181 EAL 2018
Parties: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Petitioner
v.
Francis GALDO, Respondent
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 194
Pages: 1043–1043

Head Matter:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Petitioner
v.
Francis GALDO, Respondent
No. 181 EAL 2018
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
October 2, 2018
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 2nd day of October, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
Was President Judge Pellegrini correct in dissent that the Commonwealth Court Majority's conclusion - that the property here, acquired by the City through a public-purpose condemnation designed to assist the Commonwealth with the construction of I-95, and then held for subsequent resale, was subject to adverse possession - was mistaken and in conflict with Superior Court precedent?