Case Name: Jorge Luis HERBELLO, Appellant, v. Humberto PEREZ, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-04-05
Citations: 754 So. 2d 840
Docket Number: No. 3D99-666
Parties: Jorge Luis HERBELLO, Appellant, v. Humberto PEREZ, Appellee.
Judges: Before JORGENSON, GODERICH, and RAMIREZ, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 754
Pages: 840–840

Head Matter:
Jorge Luis HERBELLO, Appellant, v. Humberto PEREZ, Appellee.
No. 3D99-666.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 5, 2000.
Oscar Syger, Miami, for appellant.
Richard A. Sherman and Rosemary B. Wilder, Fort Lauderdale; Timothy Harrington and Stephen K. Katz, Miami, for appellee.
Before JORGENSON, GODERICH, and RAMIREZ, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
After carefully reviewing the record, we find that the alleged erroneous evidentiary ruling did not affect the outcome of the trial. Therefore, the error, if any, was harmless. § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (1999); Ratos v. Cushing, 601 So.2d 612, 613 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)(holding that in a civil case the "test for harmful error is whether, but for such error, a different result may have been reached.").
Affirmed.