Case Name: RAY & HARRIS v. SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY COMPANY
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 1923-10-17
Citations: 186 N.C. 769
Docket Number: 
Parties: RAY & HARRIS v. SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY COMPANY.
Judges: 
Reporter: North Carolina Reports
Volume: 186
Pages: 769–770

Head Matter:
RAY & HARRIS v. SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY COMPANY.
(Filed 17 October, 1923.)
Appeal by defendant from Lyon, J., at March Term, 1923, of Chatham.
Civil action to recover damages for an alleged breach of contract in connection with the sale of certain cross-ties.
From a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiffs, the defendant appealed.
W. P. Horton and Siler (& Barber for plaintiffs.
Long & Bell and Murray Allen for defendant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
A careful examination of the present record leaves us with the impression that no reversible error was committed on the trial of the cause. All the exceptions are directed to alleged errors in the charge, but we think the charge as given is in substantial compliance with the 'law bearing on the subject. No prejudicial error has been made to appear. ' •
No error.