Case Name: Bernice ROBINSON, Appellant, v. Eugene H. ROBINSON, Appellee
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1956-05-23
Citations: 88 So. 2d 557
Docket Number: 
Parties: Bernice ROBINSON, Appellant, v. Eugene H. ROBINSON, Appellee.
Judges: DREW, C. J., TERRELL and THORNAL, JJ., and CARROLL, Associate Justice, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 88
Pages: 557–557

Head Matter:
Bernice ROBINSON, Appellant, v. Eugene H. ROBINSON, Appellee.
Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division A.
May 23, 1956.
Rehearing Denied July 19, 1956.
Charles J. Kapfer, Palatka, for appellant.
Angus W. Harriett, Palatka, for appel-lee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This cause came "on to be heard on the motion of appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to 31 F.S.A. Rule 38 of the rules of this court and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;
It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is
Affirmed.
DREW, C. J., TERRELL and THORNAL, JJ., and CARROLL, Associate Justice, concur.