Case Name: Kenneth Wayne O'GUINN, Petitioner-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. Michael DUTTON, Respondent-Appellant/Cross-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1995-03-10
Citations: 42 F.3d 359
Docket Number: Nos. 93-5578, 93-5620
Parties: Kenneth Wayne O’GUINN, Petitioner-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. Michael DUTTON, Respondent-Appellant/Cross-Appellee.
Judges: Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge; KEITH, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, MILBURN, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, and DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 42
Pages: 331-359–331-359

Head Matter:
Kenneth Wayne O’GUINN, Petitioner-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. Michael DUTTON, Respondent-Appellant/Cross-Appellee.
Nos. 93-5578, 93-5620.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
March 10, 1995.
Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge; KEITH, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, MILBURN, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, and DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:
The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the .docket as a pending appeal.
The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this ease for oral argument as soon as possible.