Case Name: Toledo Bar Association v. Slack
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2000-03-22
Citations: 88 Ohio St. 3d 274
Docket Number: No. 99-1895
Parties: Toledo Bar Association v. Slack.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 88
Pages: 274–276

Head Matter:
Toledo Bar Association v. Slack.
[Cite as Toledo Bar Assn. v. Slack (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 274.]
(No. 99-1895
Submitted December 15, 1999
Decided March 22, 2000.)
Jonathan B. Cherry and Matthew J. Rohrbacher, for relator.
James D. Caruso, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We adopt the findings and conclusions of the board. However, we do not accept the board's recommendation of indefinite suspension. Based on the continuing course of misconduct and respondent's multiple felony convictions, we believe that a harsher sanction is warranted. Therefore, respondent is permanently disbarred from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs are taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.