Case Name: STATE v. WYNNE et al.
Court: Louisiana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1924-06-28
Citations: 156 La. 938
Docket Number: No. 26530
Parties: STATE v. WYNNE et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Louisiana Reports
Volume: 156
Pages: 938–939

Head Matter:
(101 South. 273)
No. 26530.
STATE v. WYNNE et al.
(June 28, 1924.)
Appeal from Third Judicial District Court, Parish of Claiborne; J. E. Reynolds, Judge.
J. Rush Wimberly, of Arcadia, for appellants.
A. V. Coco, Atty. Gen., and W. D. Goff, Dist. Atty., of Arcadia (T. S. Walmsley, of New Orleans, and A. J. Bordelon, of Marksville, of counsel), for the State.

Opinion:
By the WHOLE COURT.
O'NIELL, C. J.
This case was remanded to the district court for a trial and determination of the question whether certain alleged newly discovered evidence, referred to in a motion for a new trial, was in fact newly discovered. 153 La. 414, 96 South. 15. After hearing testimony on the subject, the district court ruled that the alleged newly discovered evidence was not newly discovered. The court, therefore, overruled the motion for a new trial and resentenced the defendants. The record does not contain a bill of exceptions to the ruling, and there is no apparent error.
The verdict and sentence are affirmed.