Case Name: NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING AND DRY DOCK COMPANY, Petitioner, v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS; Mary Elston, Widow of Denmer Elston, Respondents
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-11-13
Citations: 253 F. App'x 290
Docket Number: No. 07-1360
Parties: NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING AND DRY DOCK COMPANY, Petitioner, v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS; Mary Elston, Widow of Denmer Elston, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 253
Pages: 290–290

Head Matter:
NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING AND DRY DOCK COMPANY, Petitioner, v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS; Mary Elston, Widow of Denmer Elston, Respondents.
No. 07-1360.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 19, 2007.
Decided: Nov. 13, 2007.
Jonathan H. Walker, Mason, Mason, Walker & Hedrick, P.C., Newport News, Virginia, for Petitioner. Jonathan L. Snare, Acting Solicitor of Labor, Allen H. Feldman, Associate Solicitor, Mark A. Reinhalter, Kathleen H. Kim, United States Department of Labor, Washington, D.C.; Jennifer West Vincent, Patten, Wornom, Hatten & Diamonstein, LC, Newport News, Virginia, for Respondents.
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's award of longshore survivor's benefits on a claim filed by Mary Elston pursuant to 33 U.S.C. § 901-950 (2000). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the Board. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. Director, OWCP, No. 06-0577 (B.R.B. Feb. 27, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.