Case Name: National Cash Register Co. v. Boston Cash Indicator & Recorder Co. et al.
Court: United States Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1889-12-24
Citations: 41 F. 51
Docket Number: 
Parties: National Cash Register Co. v. Boston Cash Indicator & Recorder Co. et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter
Volume: 41
Pages: 51–52

Head Matter:
National Cash Register Co. v. Boston Cash Indicator & Recorder Co. et al.
(Circuit Court, D. Massachusetts.
December 24, 1889.)
Patents bob Inventions — Action bob Inbbingement — Injunction against Other Suits.
In a suit for infringement of a patent, a court of equity has the power, upon petition of defendants, to restrain complainant from bringing further suits against the purchasers or users of the patented article, and will do so when the affidavits filed by defendants show that the suits brought are vexatious and oppressive.
Ill Equity. Petition by defendants, in a suit for infringement of a patent, to restrain complainant from bringing further suits against purchasers of the patented article.
William A. Macleod, for complainant.
John Lowell, Frederick P. Fish, and William K. Richardson, for petitioners and defendants.

Opinion:
Coxa, J.
The power of a court of equity, by petition in the main suit against a manufacturer, to restrain a complainant from bringing further suits against the purchasers or users of a patented article, seems to be recognized in this country, and to be founded upon sound principles of equity. Ide v. Engine Co., 31 Fed. Rep. 901; Allis v. Stowell, 16 Fed. Rep. 783; Birdsell v. Manufacturing Co., 1 Hughes, (U. S.) 64. Also the unreported cases of National Cash Register Co. v. Bensinger Self-Adding Cash Register Co., decided by Judge Blodgett in the northern district of Illinois, and Consolidated Store Service Co. v. Lamson Consolidated Store Service Co., decided by Judge Nelson of this district. Recognizing the existence of the power of this court to restrain the complainant, as prayed for, the only question which remains is whether the defendants have made out a case upon their affidavits which entitles them to this relief. I think an examination of the affidavits shows that the numerous suits brought by the complainant against the customers of the defendants are vexatious and oppressive, and that therefore an injunction should be granted as prayed for.
Injunction granted.