Case Name: Alan MANDEL, Appellant, v. FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA, Successor by Merger to Commercial Bank & Trust Company, Trustee Under the Will of NAN Peach, Deceased, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-05-28
Citations: 581 So. 2d 192
Docket Number: No. 90-2704
Parties: Alan MANDEL, Appellant, v. FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA, Successor by Merger to Commercial Bank & Trust Company, Trustee Under the Will of NAN Peach, Deceased, Appellee.
Judges: Before LEVY, GERSTEN and GODERICH, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 581
Pages: 192–192

Head Matter:
Alan MANDEL, Appellant, v. FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA, Successor by Merger to Commercial Bank & Trust Company, Trustee Under the Will of NAN Peach, Deceased, Appellee.
No. 90-2704.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 28, 1991.
Rehearing Denied July 18, 1991.
Howard, Brawner & Stone, and Philip L. Brawner, Miami, for appellant.
Swope and Stobs, and Glenn J. Sneider, Miami Shores, for appellee.
Before LEVY, GERSTEN and GODERICH, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant appeals from a non-final order appointing a receiver. We affirm.
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in appointing a receiver. See Interdevco, Inc. v. Brickellbank Savings Association, 524 So.2d 1087 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Carolina Portland Cement Co. v. Baumgartner, 99 Fla. 987, 128 So. 241 (1930).
It was not error for the trial court to require only the receiver to post a bond. Shops of Sunset, Ltd. v. Cohen, 551 So.2d 1272 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Boyd v. Banc One Mortgage Corp., 509 So.2d 966 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).
Affirmed.