Case Name: Kim Duane CAIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2017-05-24
Citations: 219 So. 3d 854
Docket Number: No. 4D16-2997
Parties: Kim Duane CAIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Gerber, Conner and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 219
Pages: 854–854

Head Matter:
Kim Duane CAIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D16-2997
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
[May 24, 2017]
Melissa Montle and Seth E. Miller of Innocence Project of Florida, Inc., Tallahassee, for appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and James J. Carney, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Affirmed. See Scott v. State, 46 So.3d 529, 532-33 (Fla. 2009) (any error in trial court's finding that defendant's motion for postconviction DNA testing was technically insufficient was harmless where defendant's motion for postconviction DNA testing was legally insufficient because he failed to show a reasonable probability existed that the test results would exonerate him).
Gerber, Conner and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.