Case Name: Commonwealth ex rel. Meholchick, Appellant, v. Rundle
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1966-01-04
Citations: 420 Pa. 629
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 299
Parties: Commonwealth ex rel. Meholchick, Appellant, v. Rundle.
Judges: Before Bell, C. J., Musmanno, Jones, Eagen, O’Brien and Roberts, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 420
Pages: 629–630

Head Matter:
Commonwealth ex rel. Meholchick, Appellant, v. Rundle.
January 4, 1966:
Submitted November 11, 1965.
Before Bell, C. J., Musmanno, Jones, Eagen, O’Brien and Roberts, JJ.
Raymond Meholchick, appellant, in propria persona.
Anthony B. Panaway, Assistant District Attorney, Robert J. Hourigan, First Assistant District Attorney, and Thomas E. Mack, District Attorney, for appellee.

Opinion:
Opinion
Per Curiam,
This is an appeal from an order below dismissing an action of habeas corpus without hearing.
The order was correct. The issues raised are adequately discussed and answered in Commonwealth ex rel. Fox v. Maroney, 417 Pa. 308, 207 A. 2d 810 (1965), and Commonwealth ex rel. Cuevas v. Rundle, 418 Pa. 373, 211 A. 2d 485 (1965).
Order affirmed.