Case Name: THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THOMAS STASILOWICZ, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1969-03-31
Citations: 53 N.J. 497
Docket Number: 
Parties: THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THOMAS STASILOWICZ, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 53
Pages: 497–497

Head Matter:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THOMAS STASILOWICZ, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Argued February 17, 1969
Decided March 31, 1969.
Mr. Eugene P. Kenny argued the cause for appellant.
Mr. Abel Goldstein argued the cause for respondent {Mr. James A. Tumulty, Jr., Hudson County Prosecutor, attorney; Mr. William J. Curmane, on the brief).

Opinion:
Pee Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Leonard in the Appellate Division, reported, at 105 N. J. Super. 151.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Ebancis, Proctoe, Hall, Schettino and Haneman — 7.
For reversal — None.