Case Name: Michael RODGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant v. DALLAS COUNTY, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-03-20
Citations: 682 F. App'x 311
Docket Number: No. 16-11624 Summary Calendar
Parties: Michael RODGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant v. DALLAS COUNTY, Defendant-Appellee
Judges: Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 682
Pages: 311–312

Head Matter:
Michael RODGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant v. DALLAS COUNTY, Defendant-Appellee
No. 16-11624 Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed March 20, 2017
Darían Lewis Howard, Sr., Law Office of Darían Howard, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant
Peter L. Harlan, Esq., Assistant District Attorney, District Attorney’s Office for the County of Dallas, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellee
Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of the district court is affirmed. In the Original Complaint the Appellant named the City of Dallas and the Lew Sterrett Justice Center as defendants. Dallas County is the Appellee in this appeal. The district court correctly ruled that no official Dallas County policy was pleaded as a plausible moving force behind the Appellant's claims, and also that the claims were barred by limitations because when more than a year remained for service on Dallas County, but despite numerous reminders, not done.
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.