Case Name: Charles ALFORD, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARTIN & GASS, INC.; Samuel G. Gass; Angler Construction Co., L.L.C., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-07-23
Citations: 607 F. App'x 340
Docket Number: No. 15-1475
Parties: Charles ALFORD, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARTIN & GASS, INC.; Samuel G. Gass; Angler Construction Co., L.L.C., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 607
Pages: 340–341

Head Matter:
Charles ALFORD, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARTIN & GASS, INC.; Samuel G. Gass; Angler Construction Co., L.L.C., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15-1475.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 21, 2015.
Decided: July 23, 2015.
Charles Alford, III, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Joseph Pierce, Kasimer & Annino, PC, Falls Church, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Charles Alford, III, appeals the district court's order denying his motion to reopen the case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Alford v. Martin & Gass, Inc., No. 1:08-cv-00595-LMB-TRJ (E.D.Va. Apr. 20, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.