Case Name: School-District v. Selectmen
Court: New Hampshire Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Hampshire
Decision Date: 1884-12
Citations: 63 N.H. 277
Docket Number: 
Parties: School-District v. Selectmen.
Judges: All concurred.
Reporter: New Hampshire Reports
Volume: 63
Pages: 277–277

Head Matter:
GRAFTON.
School-District v. Selectmen.
The proper remedy for an assessment of a school-district tax upon persons not taxable in the district, is an application made by them for an abatement.
Petition, entered at the law term, by school-district No. 6 in Orford, against the selectmen of Orford, for a reassessment of a school-district tax, the assessment of which was ordered by a writ ■of mandamus in School-District v. Carr, ante, p. 201. The complaint is, that some of the persons on whom the defendants made the assessment are not taxable in the district.
Bingham, Mitchells Sp Batchellor, for the plaintiffs.

Opinion:
Doe, C. J.
The appropriate remedy for an assessment of the tax upon persons not taxable in the district is an application made by them for an abatement. Locke v. Pittsfield (ante, p. 122); School-District v. Carr (ante, p. 201, 206).
Petition dismissed.
All concurred.