Case Name: Beau BRADSHAW, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-09-27
Citations: 174 S.W.3d 672
Docket Number: No. WD 64747
Parties: Beau BRADSHAW, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before HOWARD, P.J., and SMART and NEWTON, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 174
Pages: 672–672

Head Matter:
Beau BRADSHAW, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 64747.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Sept. 27, 2005.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 1, 2005.
Kent Denzel, Assistant Public Defender, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Evan J. Buchheim, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before HOWARD, P.J., and SMART and NEWTON, JJ.

Opinion:
Order
PER CURIAM.
Beau Bradshaw appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. The motion court's findings and conclusions that Bradshaw's trial counsel was not ineffective are not clearly erroneous. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
The motion court's judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).