Case Name: Marqueion HARRISON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of NORTH CAROLINA, Individually, and in his and her official capacity; Department of Correction, Division of Prisons, Individually, and in his and her official capacity; Boyd Bennett, Director of the State of North Carolina, Individually, and in his and her official capacity; Keith Whitener, Superintendent of Alexander Correctional Institution, Individually, and in his and her official capacity; FNU Gribble, Correctional Officer of the North Carolina Department of Corrections, Individually, and in his and her official capacity, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-07-01
Citations: 386 F. App'x 365
Docket Number: No. 10-6743
Parties: Marqueion HARRISON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of NORTH CAROLINA, Individually, and in his and her official capacity; Department of Correction, Division of Prisons, Individually, and in his and her official capacity; Boyd Bennett, Director of the State of North Carolina, Individually, and in his and her official capacity; Keith Whitener, Superintendent of Alexander Correctional Institution, Individually, and in his and her official capacity; FNU Gribble, Correctional Officer of the North Carolina Department of Corrections, Individually, and in his and her official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 386
Pages: 365–366

Head Matter:
Marqueion HARRISON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of NORTH CAROLINA, Individually, and in his and her official capacity; Department of Correction, Division of Prisons, Individually, and in his and her official capacity; Boyd Bennett, Director of the State of North Carolina, Individually, and in his and her official capacity; Keith Whitener, Superintendent of Alexander Correctional Institution, Individually, and in his and her official capacity; FNU Gribble, Correctional Officer of the North Carolina Department of Corrections, Individually, and in his and her official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 10-6743.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 24, 2010.
Decided: July 1, 2010.
Marqueion Harrison, Appellant Pro Se.
Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Marqueion Harrison appeals the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint for failure exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harrison v. North Carolina, No. 5:10-cv-00044-GCM, 2010 WL 1665801 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 23, 2010). We deny Harrison's motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Because the record clearly establishes that exhaustion did not occur, the order is final. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (1993).