Case Name: The STATE of Florida, FLORIDA HIGHWAY PATROL, Appellant, v. James CHANCELOR; [In re: The Forfeiture of: Twenty Nine Thousand Nine Hundred and Eighty ($29,980.00) in U.S. Currency], Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-12-26
Citations: 833 So. 2d 857
Docket Number: No. 3D02-1211
Parties: The STATE of Florida, FLORIDA HIGHWAY PATROL, Appellant, v. James CHANCELOR; [In re: The Forfeiture of: Twenty Nine Thousand Nine Hundred and Eighty ($29,980.00) in U.S. Currency], Appellee.
Judges: Before LEVY, SHEVIN and RAMIREZ, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 833
Pages: 857–857

Head Matter:
The STATE of Florida, FLORIDA HIGHWAY PATROL, Appellant, v. James CHANCELOR; [In re: The Forfeiture of: Twenty Nine Thousand Nine Hundred and Eighty ($29,980.00) in U.S. Currency], Appellee.
No. 3D02-1211.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 26, 2002.
Richard E. Doran, Attorney General, and Paulette R. Taylor, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.
Stanley Jay Bartel, Miami, for appellee.
Before LEVY, SHEVIN and RAMIREZ, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Wackenhut Protective Sys., Inc. v. Key Biscayne Commodore Club Condo. I, Inc., 350 So.2d 1150, 1151 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)("Florida case law applies a test of prejudice to the defendant as the primary consideration in determining whether the plaintiffs motion to amend should be granted or denied."). See also San Martin v. Dadeland Dodge, Inc., 508 So.2d 497 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).