Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Lisa D. HAZELRIGG, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2013-04-09
Citations: 395 S.W.3d 613
Docket Number: No. WD 74833
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Lisa D. HAZELRIGG, Appellant.
Judges: Before Division Three: CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Presiding Judge, JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge and GARY D. WITT, Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 395
Pages: 613–614

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Lisa D. HAZELRIGG, Appellant.
No. WD 74833.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
April 9, 2013.
Karen Woodley, Warsaw, MO, for respondent.
Ellen H. Flottman, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Before Division Three: CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Presiding Judge, JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge and GARY D. WITT, Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Lisa Hazelrigg appeals from a conviction of one count of animal abuse under section 578.012. She argues that the trial court abused its discretion in overruling her motion in limine and objections to testimony from witnesses that described her dog as a "pit bull" or "pit mix" because the term's probative value was outweighed by its prejudicial impact. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).