Case Name: TOWNSHIP OF BRICK ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. WILLIAM SPIVAK ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1967-06-12
Citations: 49 N.J. 400
Docket Number: 
Parties: TOWNSHIP OF BRICK ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. WILLIAM SPIVAK ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 49
Pages: 400–400

Head Matter:
TOWNSHIP OF BRICK ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. WILLIAM SPIVAK ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Argued June 12, 1967
Decided June 12, 1967.
Mr. Harold A. Schuman argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. Haines, Schuman & Butz, attorneys).
Mr. Ellsworth J. Sterner argued the cause for the respondent.

Opinion:
Pee Cubiam.
The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons given in the majority opinion. Appellants' position depends upon the hypothesis that the Legislature in fact intended that a majority vote for three candidates shall result in the election of the next four candidates as well. We cannot be sure the Legislature so intended. We see no substantial constitutional issue.
No costs.
Eor affirmance—Chief Justice Weinteatjb and Justices Jacobs, Fbancis, Peootoe, Hall, Schettino and Hare-man—7.
For reversal—None.