Case Name: Arthur O. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Benjamin S. MARKS, Jr.; H. Terry Hutchens; Connie Inverstine; UC Lending Corporation; Brenda Flinclum, Defendants-Appellees; Arthur O. Armstrong, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer Watson; Officer Cook; Christine Duffany, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-07-09
Citations: 13 F. App'x 160
Docket Number: Nos. 01-1195, 01-1316
Parties: Arthur O. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Benjamin S. MARKS, Jr.; H. Terry Hutchens; Connie Inverstine; UC Lending Corporation; Brenda Flinclum, Defendants-Appellees. Arthur O. Armstrong, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer Watson; Officer Cook; Christine Duffany, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 13
Pages: 160–160

Head Matter:
Arthur O. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Benjamin S. MARKS, Jr.; H. Terry Hutchens; Connie Inverstine; UC Lending Corporation; Brenda Flinclum, Defendants-Appellees. Arthur O. Armstrong, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer Watson; Officer Cook; Christine Duffany, Defendants-Appellees.
Nos. 01-1195, 01-1316.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted June 8, 2001.
Decided July 9, 2001.
Arthur O. Armstrong, pro se. Richard Thompson Wright, Greensboro, NC, for appellees.
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In these consolidated appeals, Arthur O. Armstrong appeals district court orders denying leave to reopen cases. In No. 01-1195, this Court entered an order on June 4, 2001, sanctioning Armstrong and noting that the appeal was frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal and deny the motion for summary judgment. In No. 01-1316, we dismiss the appeal and deny the motions for summary judgment, for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and to add an additional party. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.