Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jermaine C. PADEN, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-11-07
Citations: 204 S.W.3d 753
Docket Number: No. WD 65031
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jermaine C. PADEN, Appellant.
Judges: Before SMITH, C.J., and BRECKENRIDGE and SMART, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 204
Pages: 753–754

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jermaine C. PADEN, Appellant.
No. WD 65031.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Nov. 7, 2006.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Robert J. (Jeff) Bartholomew, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Susan L. Hogan, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant.
Before SMITH, C.J., and BRECKENRIDGE and SMART, JJ.

Opinion:
Order
PER CURIAM.
Jermaine C. Paden appeals the judgment of his conviction, after a bench trial in the Circuit Court of Jackson County, of trafficking in the second degree, in violation of § 195.223. The State charged that "on or about January 3, 2003, in the County of Jackson, State of Missouri, the defendant possessed: 6 grams or more of a mixture of substance containing cocaine base, a controlled substance, knowing of its presence and nature." As a result of his conviction, he was sentenced, as a prior offender, § 558.016, and as a prior drug offender, § 195.296, to a term of ten years in the Missouri Department of Corrections.
In his sole point on appeal, the appellant claims that the trial court erred in overruling his motion for judgment of acquittal, at the close of the State's and all the evidence, because the State failed to prove, as a matter of due process, the essential element of the offense, as provided in § 195.223, that he was in "possession" of the cocaine that was seized.
We affirm pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).