Case Name: F. W. MATTHIESSEN et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF SANTA BARBARA (a Municipal Corporation), Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1933-04-03
Citations: 217 Cal. 789
Docket Number: L. A. No. 12833
Parties: F. W. MATTHIESSEN et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF SANTA BARBARA (a Municipal Corporation), Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Reports
Volume: 217
Pages: 789–790

Head Matter:
[L. A. No. 12833.
In Bank.
April 3, 1933.]
F. W. MATTHIESSEN et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF SANTA BARBARA (a Municipal Corporation), Respondent.
James P. Peck and Charles P. Blackstoek for Appellants.
William P. Hubbard, as Amicus Curiae on Behalf of Appellants.
J. P. Goux, City Attorney, Heaney, Price & Postel and W. G. Irving for Respondent. p

Opinion:
THE COURT.
The appeal in this case involves the same questions presented in the case of Gin S. Chow v. City of Santa Barbara, (L. A. No. 12834) ante, p. 673 [22 Pac. (2d) 5], this day decided, and by stipulation was submitted on the same briefs filed in that ease. On the authority of that case the judgment herein is affirmed.
Preston, J., dissented.
Rehearing denied.
Preston, J., dissented.