Case Name: HOLLAND et al. v. HOGAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, et al.
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1968-06-17
Citations: 392 U.S. 654
Docket Number: No. 653
Parties: HOLLAND et al. v. HOGAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, et al.
Judges: Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 392
Pages: 654–654

Head Matter:
HOLLAND et al. v. HOGAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, et al.
No. 653.
Decided June 17, 1968.
Robert Abelow, Marshall C. Berger, and Donald J. Williamson for appellants.
Frank S. Hogan, H. Richard Uviller, and Michael R. Stack, each pro se, and for Yasgur et al., J. Lee Rankin, Norman Redlich, and Stanley Buchsbaum for Adler, and Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pro se, and Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Brenda Soloff, Assistant Attorney General, for Lefkowitz, appellees.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for further consideration in light of Gardner v. Broderick, ante, p. 273, and George Campbell Painting Corp. v. Reid, ante, p. 286.
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.