Case Name: Joseph DELL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-05-22
Citations: 673 So. 2d 576
Docket Number: No. 96-1141
Parties: Joseph DELL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, JORGENSON and GODERICH, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 673
Pages: 576–577

Head Matter:
Joseph DELL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 96-1141.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 22, 1996.
Joseph Dell, in pro. per.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before BARKDULL, JORGENSON and GODERICH, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Zeigler v. State, 632 So.2d 48 (Fla.1993) ("A successive motion [for postcon-viction relief] may be dismissed if it fails to allege new or different grounds for relief and the prior determination was on the merits, or if new and different grounds are alleged, the failure to raise those issues in a prior motion constitutes an abuse of process."), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 104, 130 L.Ed.2d 52 (1994); Ragan v. State, 643 So.2d 1175 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Judge v. State, 596 So.2d 73 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991) (sentence imposing adult sanctions on juvenile in the absence of specific findings regarding the criteria set forth in section 39.059(7)(c), Florida Statutes, must be raised on direct appeal) (cited with approval by McCloud v. State, 653 So.2d 453 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)), rev. denied, 613 So.2d 5 (Fla.1992).