Case Name: Bee Jay Industrial Corp., Appellant, v. Charles Fina et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1984-06-07
Citations: 62 N.Y.2d 851
Docket Number: 
Parties: Bee Jay Industrial Corp., Appellant, v Charles Fina et al., Respondents.
Judges: Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 62
Pages: 851–853

Head Matter:
Bee Jay Industrial Corp., Appellant, v Charles Fina et al., Respondents.
Decided June 7, 1984
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Richard M. Gordon for appellant.
Harold J. McLaughlin for respondents.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (98 AD2d 738). We note that defendants' motion for summary judgment was itself predicated on the absence of a written contract as required by the Statute of Frauds (General Obligations Law, § 5-703, subd 2).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.