Case Name: Maureen S. LAROUERE, Appellant, v. James U. LAROUERE, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1984-08-01
Citations: 453 So. 2d 516
Docket Number: No. 83-1751
Parties: Maureen S. LAROUERE, Appellant, v. James U. LAROUERE, Appellee.
Judges: DANAHY and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 453
Pages: 516–516

Head Matter:
Maureen S. LAROUERE, Appellant, v. James U. LAROUERE, Appellee.
No. 83-1751.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Aug. 1, 1984.
Everett Q. Jones, Tampa, for appellant.
W. Craig Hall and Albert M. Salem, Jr. of Salem, Musial & Morse, P.A., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
RYDER, Chief Judge.
From the record before us, we hold that there was no error in the trial court proceedings. The trial judge did not abuse his discretion and he made a proper decision. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197, 1202-1203 (Fla.1980); Monnar v. Monnar, 422 So.2d 362 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Dominik v. Dominik, 390 So.2d 81 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). Although the marital property was distributed according to the formula set forth in Landay v. Landay, 400 So.2d 43 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981), it comports with that formula approved in Landay v. Landay, 429 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1983).
AFFIRMED.
DANAHY and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.