Case Name: Lauren LINARES, Cecilia Loyola, James Stanley, Samuel Unger, Jacob Unger, Catherine Unger, Jessica Mager, Karl Mager, Marsha Mager, Amber Dinicola, Alexis Dinicola, Joseph Dinicola, Alexa McPheron, Michelle McPheron, Michelle Carvalho, Noah Radle, Benjamin Radle, Stephen Radle, Aj Nessler, Anthony Nessler and Alison Faiella, Appellants, v. SCHOOL BOARD OF PASCO COUNTY, Appellee.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2018-09-07
Citations: 253 So. 3d 1253
Docket Number: Case No. 2D17-1729
Parties: Lauren LINARES, Cecilia Loyola, James Stanley, Samuel Unger, Jacob Unger, Catherine Unger, Jessica Mager, Karl Mager, Marsha Mager, Amber Dinicola, Alexis Dinicola, Joseph Dinicola, Alexa McPheron, Michelle McPheron, Michelle Carvalho, Noah Radle, Benjamin Radle, Stephen Radle, Aj Nessler, Anthony Nessler and Alison Faiella, Appellants,
v.
SCHOOL BOARD OF PASCO COUNTY, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 253
Pages: 1253–1254

Head Matter:
Lauren LINARES, Cecilia Loyola, James Stanley, Samuel Unger, Jacob Unger, Catherine Unger, Jessica Mager, Karl Mager, Marsha Mager, Amber Dinicola, Alexis Dinicola, Joseph Dinicola, Alexa McPheron, Michelle McPheron, Michelle Carvalho, Noah Radle, Benjamin Radle, Stephen Radle, Aj Nessler, Anthony Nessler and Alison Faiella, Appellants,
v.
SCHOOL BOARD OF PASCO COUNTY, Appellee.
Case No. 2D17-1729
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Opinion filed September 7, 2018
Sharon Carlstedt Britton and Caroline Newton Catchpole of Phelps Dunbar LLP, Tampa, for Appellants.
Dennis J. Alfonso and Knute J. Nathe of McClain, Alfonso, Meeker & Nathe, Dade City, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this appeal, several Pasco County parents and students (Parents) challenged an Administrative Law Judge's determination that the Pasco County School Board validly exercised its delegated legislative authority in approving a change of school attendance boundaries for the 2017-2018 school year (the Attendance Boundary Rule). While this appeal was pending, the Parents also had pending in the trial court a related but separate lawsuit alleging that the School Board had violated Florida's Sunshine Laws during its deliberations on the Attendance Boundary Rule. The Parents prevailed in that lawsuit, and the trial court quashed the Attendance Boundary Rule. The trial court denied the School Board's subsequent motion for rehearing, and the School Board has not appealed.
The challenged rule having been quashed, this appeal is dismissed as moot. See Fla. Citizens All., Inc. v. Sch. Bd. of Collier Cty., 247 So.3d 720 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018) ; Lund v. Dep't of Health, 708 So.2d 645, 646 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) ("The general rule in Florida is that a case on appeal becomes moot when a change in circumstances occurs before an appellate court's decision, thereby making it impossible for the court to provide effectual relief."); cf. Freni v. Collier County, 573 So.2d 1054, 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991) (affirming an order denying as moot a temporary injunction to enjoin a referendum regarding a proposed tax where, after denial of the motion, the referendum was held and the appellants' position prevailed).
Dismissed.
VILLANTI, SALARIO, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
It appears that the School Board has since conducted additional proceedings and, based on those, has approved a new change of school attendance boundaries.