Case Name: MUNOZ REALTY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOROUGH OF VERONA, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1966-12-21
Citations: 48 N.J. 360
Docket Number: 
Parties: MUNOZ REALTY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOROUGH OF VERONA, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 48
Pages: 360–361

Head Matter:
MUNOZ REALTY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOROUGH OF VERONA, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Argued November 21 and November 22, 1966—
Decided December 21, 1966.
Mr. Newton H. Porter, Jr. argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Porter & Hobart, of counsel).
Mr. Emil E. Mascia argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Sarcone & Mascia, of counsel).

Opinion:
The opinion of the court was delivered
Per Curiam.
The judgment of the Appellate Division of the Superior Court is affirmed for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Francis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Haneman— 6.
For reversal —None.