Case Name: Jabbar Jomo STRAWS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jason CRAWFORD, Lexington County Sheriffs Department; Jason Shuler, Batesburg Leesville Police Department, Defendants-Appellees, and Lexington County Sheriffs Department; Batesburg-Leesville Police Department, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-10-11
Citations: 250 F. App'x 576
Docket Number: No. 07-6761
Parties: Jabbar Jomo STRAWS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Jason CRAWFORD, Lexington County Sheriffs Department; Jason Shuler, Batesburg Leesville Police Department, Defendants—Appellees, and Lexington County Sheriffs Department; Batesburg-Leesville Police Department, Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 250
Pages: 576–576

Head Matter:
Jabbar Jomo STRAWS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Jason CRAWFORD, Lexington County Sheriffs Department; Jason Shuler, Batesburg Leesville Police Department, Defendants—Appellees, and Lexington County Sheriffs Department; Batesburg-Leesville Police Department, Defendants.
No. 07-6761.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 26, 2007.
Decided: Oct. 11, 2007.
Jabbar Jomo Straws, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, Daniel C. Plyler, Davidson, Morrison & Lindemann, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee Jason Crawford.
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Jabbar Jomo Straws appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Straws v. Crawford, No. 4:06-cv-03220-HFF, 2007 WL 1302685 (D.S.C. May 2, 2007). We dispense with oral argu-. ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.