Case Name: Joaquin A. HERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-02-22
Citations: 414 F. App'x 974
Docket Number: No. 07-72256
Parties: Joaquin A. HERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 414
Pages: 974–975

Head Matter:
Joaquin A. HERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 07-72256.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 16, 2010.
Filed Feb. 22, 2011.
Joaquin A. Hernandez, Los Angeles, CA, pro se.
Lindsay Brooke Glauner, Esquire, Trial, OIL, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Joaquin A. Hernandez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions pro se for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals' order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge's decision denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence factual findings, Santos-Lemus v. Mukasey, 542 F.3d 738, 742 (9th Cir.2008), and we deny the petition.
Substantial evidence supports the agency's determination that Hernandez failed to establish that he suffered past persecution by the government or guerillas. See Nagoulko v. INS, 333 F.3d 1012, 1017 (9th Cir.2003). Substantial evidence also supports the agency's determination that Hernandez failed to establish a nexus between the persecution he fears from gang members in El Salvador and a statutorily protected ground. See Barrios v. Holder, 581 F.3d 849, 854-56 (9th Cir.2009). Because Hernandez failed to demonstrate persecution or a well founded fear of future persecution on account of a protected ground, we deny the petition as to his asylum and withholding of removal claims. See Na-goulko, 333 F.3d at 1018; Barrios, 581 F.3d at 856.
PETITIONER FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.