Case Name: Danny Ray MERRIMAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-04-17
Citations: 671 So. 2d 879
Docket Number: No. 95-734
Parties: Danny Ray MERRIMAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before JORGENSON, COPE and LEVY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 671
Pages: 879–879

Head Matter:
Danny Ray MERRIMAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 95-734.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 17, 1996.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Ivy Ginsberg Shanock, Special Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Sylvie Perez Posner, Assistant Attorney General, Hollywood, for appellee.
Before JORGENSON, COPE and LEVY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm defendant's conviction. However, we have no alternative but to reverse the sentencing order and remand for reimposition of the original agreed twenty-four-year habitual offender sentence. There is no provision in the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure for a trial court's subsequent enhancement of a legal sentence that it has imposed. Royal v. State, 389 So.2d 696, 697 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.800.
Affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded with directions.