Case Name: Steven ROLLAKANTI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HOLY CROSS HOSPITAL, Defendant-Appellee, and William Federick; Andrene Towsen; Johny Niles, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-10-23
Citations: 699 F. App'x 235
Docket Number: No. 17-1953
Parties: Steven ROLLAKANTI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HOLY CROSS HOSPITAL, Defendant-Appellee, and William Federick; Andrene Towsen; Johny Niles, Defendants.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 699
Pages: 235–235

Head Matter:
Steven ROLLAKANTI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HOLY CROSS HOSPITAL, Defendant-Appellee, and William Federick; Andrene Towsen; Johny Niles, Defendants.
No. 17-1953
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: October 19, 2017
Decided: October 23, 2017
Steven Rollakanti, Appellant Pro Se. Robert R. Niccolini, OGLETREE DEA-KINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Steven Rollakanti appeals the district court's order denying his motion for an extension of time in which to file an amended complaint after the court had dismissed the complaint in part without prejudice. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Rolla-kanti's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, Rollakanti has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the. appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED