Case Name: Bruce BARNES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-01-13
Citations: 658 So. 2d 538
Docket Number: No. 94-00056
Parties: Bruce BARNES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: RYDER, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 658
Pages: 538–538

Head Matter:
Bruce BARNES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 94-00056.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Jan. 13, 1995.
Stephen M. Martin, Lakeland, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Ron Napolitano, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the judgment and sentences in all respects, but strike the imposition of the "cost/fine" in the amount of $33 because it was not announced at sentencing and there is no statutory authority given for the assessment of such a cost. Sutton v. State, 635 So.2d 1032 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). On remand, the state may seek to reimpose these costs consistent with the law expressed in Sutton.
Affirmed as modified and remanded with directions.
RYDER, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and QUINCE, JJ., concur.