Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael J. SINDRAM, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-02-14
Citations: 164 F. App'x 459
Docket Number: No. 05-7269, 05-7336, 05-7478
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Michael J. SINDRAM, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 164
Pages: 459–459

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Michael J. SINDRAM, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 05-7269, 05-7336, 05-7478.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 21, 2005.
Decided Feb. 14, 2006.
Michael J. Sindram, Appellant Pro Se. Tamera Lynn Fine, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland; Hollis Raphael Weisman, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Michael J. Sindram appeals district court orders denying his motions for modification and clarification, reconsideration and for appropriate relief. We have reviewed the record and the district court orders and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Sindram, No. CR-96-111 (D. Md. Aug. 1, 2005; filed Aug. 12, 2005, entered Aug. 15, 2005; filed Sept. 6, 2005, entered Sept. 7, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED