Case Name: The Younger & Farmer Co. v. Janet M. Halliday
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1923
Citations: 1 Ohio Law Abs. 371
Docket Number: No. 17593
Parties: The Younger & Farmer Co. v. Janet M. Halliday.
Judges: Wanamaker, Jones, Matthias and Allen, JJ., concur.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 1
Pages: 371–371

Head Matter:
No. 17593
The Younger & Farmer Co. v. Janet M. Halliday.
Error to the Court of Appeals of Cuya-hoga county.
PRACTICE — (1) Amendment of pleading after waiver if jury does not cancel waiver — (2) Too late after trial and judgment, to raise "question as to which pleadings authorize.

Opinion:
ROBINSON, J.
1. An amendment to a pleading, after a jury has been waived, which does not change the issues of fact but affects the remedy only, is not effective to cancel the waiver of a trial by jury.
2. Where a case is tried upon a given theory, and evidence is introduced pro and con upon such theory without objection, it is too late after trial and judgment to raise the question for the first time whether the pleadings warrant such a theory.
Judgment of the Court of Appeals reversed and that of the Court of Common Pleas affirmed.
Wanamaker, Jones, Matthias and Allen, JJ., concur.