Case Name: Devaneius BOSTIC, Appellant, v. Cortez MEEKS, by and through Marie MEEKS and the State of Missouri, Division of Family Services, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-11-21
Citations: 32 S.W.3d 186
Docket Number: No. ED 77341
Parties: Devaneius BOSTIC, Appellant, v. Cortez MEEKS, by and through Marie MEEKS and the State of Missouri, Division of Family Services, Respondent.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, J., JAMES R. DOWD, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 32
Pages: 186–187

Head Matter:
Devaneius BOSTIC, Appellant, v. Cortez MEEKS, by and through Marie MEEKS and the State of Missouri, Division of Family Services, Respondent.
No. ED 77341.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Nov. 21, 2000.
Randall D. Grady, Clayton, for appellant.
Susan Smith Frederick, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, J., JAMES R. DOWD, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Devaneius Bostic appeals from the trial court's dismissal of his suit on the pleadings. We have reviewed the brief, the record on appeal and considered the claims made at oral argument. We conclude that the judgment of the circuit court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Bostic's suit on the pleadings. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).