Case Name: SOUTHEAST FISH AND SEAFOOD CO., etc., Appellant, v. Edsel CADENA, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2013-02-20
Citations: 106 So. 3d 1009
Docket Number: No. 3D12-1246
Parties: SOUTHEAST FISH AND SEAFOOD CO., etc., Appellant, v. Edsel CADENA, Appellee.
Judges: Before SUAREZ, CORTINAS and SALTER, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 106
Pages: 1009–1009

Head Matter:
SOUTHEAST FISH AND SEAFOOD CO., etc., Appellant, v. Edsel CADENA, Appellee.
No. 3D12-1246.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 20, 2013.
Roniel Rodriguez, IV, Aventura, for appellant.
Ritter Chusid Bivona & Cohen, LLP, and Shawn R. Horwick, Boca Raton, and Gregory Ritter, Coral Springs, for appel-lee.
Before SUAREZ, CORTINAS and SALTER, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See, e.g., Pariz v. Colon, 77 So.3d 721, 722 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (holding that a trial court had in rem jurisdiction over property situated within the county); Griveas v. Amoco Oil Co., 854 So.2d 841, 843 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) ("Only the circuit court in the county where the real property is located has in rem jurisdiction.").