Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Gustavo SANCHEZ; also known as Gustavo Sanchez Sanchez, also known as Gabriel Jimenez, also known as Gabriez Jimenez, also known as Gabriez Jimemez, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-08-18
Citations: 333 F. App'x 868
Docket Number: No. 08-20560
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Gustavo SANCHEZ; also known as Gustavo Sanchez Sanchez, also known as Gabriel Jimenez, also known as Gabriez Jimenez, also known as Gabriez Jimemez, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 333
Pages: 868–869

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Gustavo SANCHEZ; also known as Gustavo Sanchez Sanchez, also known as Gabriel Jimenez, also known as Gabriez Jimenez, also known as Gabriez Jimemez, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-20560
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 18, 2009.
James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal, Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Gustavo Sanchez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Sanchez has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel's brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cm. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.