Case Name: Lacy DAVIS, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNKNOWN SHERIFF OF ALEXANDRIA CITY DETENTION CENTER, all in their individual capacities; Unknown Deputy Officers of Alexandria City Detention Center, all in their individual capacities, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-01-06
Citations: 53 F. App'x 711
Docket Number: No. 02-7508
Parties: Lacy DAVIS, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNKNOWN SHERIFF OF ALEXANDRIA CITY DETENTION CENTER, all in their individual capacities; Unknown Deputy Officers of Alexandria City Detention Center, all in their individual capacities, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 53
Pages: 711–712

Head Matter:
Lacy DAVIS, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNKNOWN SHERIFF OF ALEXANDRIA CITY DETENTION CENTER, all in their individual capacities; Unknown Deputy Officers of Alexandria City Detention Center, all in their individual capacities, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 02-7508.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 19, 2002.
Decided Jan. 6, 2003.
Lacy Davis, III, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Lacy Davis appeals from the district court's orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2000) and denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Davis v. Unknown Sheriff of Alexandria City Detention Ctr., No. CA-02-680-2 (E.D. Va. Sept. 4, 2002; Sept. 23, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.