Case Name: STATE of Louisiana v. Fern RANDLESTON
Court: Louisiana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1996-10-04
Citations: 681 So. 2d 936
Docket Number: No. 96-KK-1646
Parties: STATE of Louisiana v. Fern RANDLESTON.
Judges: CALOGERO, C. J., and JOHNSON, J., dissent.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 681
Pages: 936–936

Head Matter:
STATE of Louisiana v. Fern RANDLESTON.
No. 96-KK-1646.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Oct. 4, 1996.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Defendant was charged with one count of simple possession of cocaine residue, and pled guilty as charged. She was adjudicated as a second felony offender. The trial court sentenced her to ninety days, below the statutory minimum of thirty months mandated for a second offender under La.R.S. 15:529.1 The court of appeal affirmed and the state now applies to this court.
Louisiana's judiciary maintains the distinct responsibility of reviewing sentences imposed in criminal cases for constitutional excessiveness. State v. Sepulvado, 367 So.2d 762 (La.1979). However, in order to find the punishment mandated by La.R.S. 15:529.1 excessive, the trial judge must find that the sentence makes no measurable contribution to the acceptable goals of punishment or that the sentence amounts to nothing more than the purposeful imposition of pain and suffering and is grossly out of proportion to the severity of the crime. State v. Dorthey, 623 So.2d 1276 (La.1993).
Although the trial judge cited Dorthey in his reasons, it does not appear that he made a proper finding that imposition of the statutorily-mandated sentence would be constitutionally excessive. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeal is vacated, and the case remanded to the trial court to justify its deviation from the statutorily-mandated minimum sentence in this case.
CALOGERO, C. J., and JOHNSON, J., dissent.
LEMMON, J., not on panel.