Case Name: James GUICE, Appellant, v. Denis H. AGNIEL, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-12-15
Citations: 84 F. App'x 700
Docket Number: No. 03-2623
Parties: James GUICE, Appellant, v. Denis H. AGNIEL, Appellee.
Judges: Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 84
Pages: 700–700

Head Matter:
James GUICE, Appellant, v. Denis H. AGNIEL, Appellee.
No. 03-2623.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 5, 2003.
Decided Dec. 15, 2003.
James Guice, pro se, Charleston, MO, Plaintiff-Appellant.
Frank A. Jung, Asst. Atty. General, Attorney General’s Office, Jefferson City, MO, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
James Guice appeals the district court's denial of Guice's Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion, in which Guice requested the district court reconsider its order dismissing Guice's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We conclude the district court's denial of Guice's Rule 60(b) motion was not an abuse of discretion because Guice failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances existed to warrant post-judgment relief. See Arnold v. Wood, 238 F.3d 992, 998 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 975, 122 S.Ct. 400, 151 L.Ed.2d 304 (2001). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny the pending motions.
The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable William A. Knox, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri.