Case Name: Raymond Curtis EVANS, Appellant v. DANIELS, Warden, et al., Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-02-04
Citations: 365 F. App'x 224
Docket Number: No. 10-5007
Parties: Raymond Curtis EVANS, Appellant v. DANIELS, Warden, et al., Appellees.
Judges: BEFORE: SENTELLE, Chief Judge; and HENDERSON and TATEL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 365
Pages: 224–225

Head Matter:
Raymond Curtis EVANS, Appellant v. DANIELS, Warden, et al., Appellees.
No. 10-5007.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Feb. 4, 2010.
BEFORE: SENTELLE, Chief Judge; and HENDERSON and TATEL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the motion for a certificate of appealability and for summary reversal, it is
ORDERED that the motion for certificate of appealability be denied. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). Because appellant has not made "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right," 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), no certificate of appealability is warranted. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000). Appellant may not challenge his District of Columbia conviction in federal court unless his remedy under D.C.Code § 23-110(g) is inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention. See, e.g., Blair-Bey v. Quick, 151 F.3d 1036, 1042-43 (D.C.Cir.1998). It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for summary reversal be dismissed as moot.
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. Because no certificate of appealability has been allowed, no mandate will issue.