Case Name: Eugene D. CARPER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-01-28
Citations: 311 F. App'x 30
Docket Number: No. 08-35514
Parties: Eugene D. CARPER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: O’SCANNLAIN, SILVERMAN and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 311
Pages: 30–30

Head Matter:
Eugene D. CARPER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 08-35514.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 20, 2009.
Filed Jan. 28, 2009.
Eugene D. Carper, Monroe, WA, pro se.
Amanda M. Migchelbrink, Esquire, AGWA-Office of the Washington Attorney General, Olympia, WA, Randall Joseph Watts, Office of the Prosecutor, Belling-ham, WA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, SILVERMAN and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
A review of the record and the response to the order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.
All pending motions are denied as moot.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.