Case Name: Elizabeth S. PAOLUCCI, Respondent v. UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW, Petitioner
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2015-12-08
Citations: 127 A.3d 1289
Docket Number: 
Parties: Elizabeth S. PAOLUCCI, Respondent v. UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW, Petitioner.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 127
Pages: 1289–1290

Head Matter:
Elizabeth S. PAOLUCCI, Respondent v. UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW, Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Dec. 8, 2015.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 8th day of December, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues are:
(1) Does the Commonwealth Court's opinion conflict with this Court's precedent in Bortz v. WCAB, [546 Pa. 77, 683 A.2d 259 (1996),] which recognized the distinct conduct stan dards in workers' compensation and unemployment compensation adjudi-catiops?
(2) Does the Commonwealth Court's opinion conflict with this Court's precedent in Harkness v. U[nemployment Comp. Bd. of Review 591 Pa. 543, 920 A.2d 162 (2007),] which emphasized the prompt and- informal nature of unemployment compensation proceedings and, therefore, presents a question of such substantial public importance as to require this Court's definitive resolution?