Case Name: Sulil Realty Corp., Appellant, v. Rye Motors, Inc., Defendant. State National Bank of Connecticut, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1965-07-01
Citations: 47 Misc. 2d 715
Docket Number: 
Parties: Sulil Realty Corp., Appellant, v. Rye Motors, Inc., Defendant. State National Bank of Connecticut, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 47
Pages: 715–715

Head Matter:
Sulil Realty Corp., Appellant, v. Rye Motors, Inc., Defendant. State National Bank of Connecticut, Respondent.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
July 1, 1965.
David C. Gilberg for appellant. Philip F. Schneider for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The order should be affirmed, without costs on the sole ground that title to the property in question was in the respondent, and not in the defendant, at the time the restraining notice was served.
Concur — Martuscbllo, Hogan and Ritchie, JJ.
Order affirmed, etc.