Case Name: Kimberly HICKS, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Eric R. MAYES, Respondent/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-06-24
Citations: 113 S.W.3d 227
Docket Number: No. ED 81698
Parties: Kimberly HICKS, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Eric R. MAYES, Respondent/Appellant.
Judges: Before PAUL J. SIMON, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, Sr., J. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 113
Pages: 227–227

Head Matter:
Kimberly HICKS, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Eric R. MAYES, Respondent/Appellant.
No. ED 81698.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District. Division Two.
June 24, 2003.
Rehearing Denied Aug. 21, 2003.
Steven D. Brooks, Macarthur Moten, P.C., St. Louis, for respondent.
Jody H. Wolff, Jody H. Wolff, L.L.C., Clayton, for appellant.
Before PAUL J. SIMON, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, Sr., J. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Father appeals from the trial court's judgment modifying the child support and custody provisions of an order of paternity. The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).
No jurisdictional purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).