Case Name: Vincent WALSH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-12-29
Citations: 627 So. 2d 1349
Docket Number: No. 92-3630
Parties: Vincent WALSH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and FARMER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 627
Pages: 1349–1350

Head Matter:
Vincent WALSH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 92-3630.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Dec. 29, 1993.
Michael D. Gelety, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James T. Carney, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We reverse and remand for resentencing within the guidelines. See Smith v. State, 598 So.2d 1063 (Fla.1992); Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla.1990). The appellant has also pointed out conflicting orders concerning credit for time served. Upon resentencing, this conflict should be resolved and the trial court should specify the dates of incarceration for which appellant is being credited.
ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and FARMER, JJ., concur.