Case Name: Ball v. Maxwell, Warden
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1965-01-20
Citations: 1 Ohio St. 2d 77
Docket Number: No. 39171
Parties: Ball v. Maxwell, Warden.
Judges: Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Second Series
Volume: 1
Pages: 77–78

Head Matter:
Ball v. Maxwell, Warden.
[Cite as Ball v. Maxwell, Warden, 1 Ohio St. 2d 77.]
(No. 39171
Decided January 20, 1965.)
Mr. Byron B. Ball, in propria persona.
Mr. William B. Saxbe, attorney general, and Mr. William C. Baird, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
In this action, petitioner is attacking only the validity of his 1961 convictions. Inasmuch as petitioner is still subject to detention under his 1960 convictions habeas corpus does not lie. To entitle one to relief by habeas corpus a determination of the action in petitioner's favor must effectuate a release from present confinement. Page v. Green, Supt., 174 Ohio St. 178; Neal v. Maxwell, Warden, 176 Ohio St. 206; and Lowther v. Maxwell, Warden, 175 Ohio St. 39.
Petitioner remanded to custody.
Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O'Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.