Case Name: Robert DUNSTAN, Appellant, v. TOMPKINS IMPLEMENT COMPANY, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2017-10-24
Citations: 530 S.W.3d 645
Docket Number: WD 80292
Parties: Robert DUNSTAN, Appellant, v. TOMPKINS IMPLEMENT COMPANY, Respondent.
Judges: Before Division Four: Mark D. Pfeiffer, Chief Judge, Gary D. Witt, Judge and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judge
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 530
Pages: 645–645

Head Matter:
Robert DUNSTAN, Appellant, v. TOMPKINS IMPLEMENT COMPANY, Respondent.
WD 80292
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Order filed: October 24, 2017
Audrey E. Smollen, Jefferson City, for Appellant
Matthew F. Howard, Eldon, for Respondent
Before Division Four: Mark D. Pfeiffer, Chief Judge, Gary D. Witt, Judge and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judge

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Robert Dunstan appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Miller County in favor of Tompkins Implement Company on his claim brought under Missouri's Merchandising Practices Act. Finding no error, we affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. Missouri Supreme Court Rule 84.16(b).