Case Name: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Frankie ROSADO, Petitioner
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2015-12-31
Citations: 129 A.3d 1237
Docket Number: 
Parties: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Frankie ROSADO, Petitioner.
Judges: Justice EAKIN did no.t participate in ■ the decision of this matter.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 129
Pages: 1237–1238

Head Matter:
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Frankie ROSADO, Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Dec. 31, 2015.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 31st day of December, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is as follows:
Whether the Pennsylvania Superior Court erred by upholding the decision of the Monroe County Court of Common - Pleas denying Petitioner PCRA relief in the form of a nunc pro tunc - Superior Court appeal from his trial where it was clearly demonstrated that Petitioner was never given the opportunity to have his appeal heard by such court as the result [of] ineffective representation of prior counsel?
Justice EAKIN did no.t participate in the decision of this matter.