Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darry Marvin HARROD, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-08-31
Citations: 393 F. App'x 121
Docket Number: No. 09-8198
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darry Marvin HARROD, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 393
Pages: 121–122

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darry Marvin HARROD, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-8198.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 26, 2010.
Decided: Aug. 31, 2010.
Darry Marvin Harrod, Appellant Pro Se. Debra Lynn Dwyer, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Darry Marvin Harrod seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his Motion for an Injunction and Other Relief. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Harrod seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.