Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. ESTANISLAO VALDEZ VALDOVINOS, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1992-06-03
Citations: 113 Or. App. 382
Docket Number: 9005-32899: CA A67277
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. ESTANISLAO VALDEZ VALDOVINOS, Appellant.
Judges: Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Deits and Durham, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 113
Pages: 382–383

Head Matter:
Submitted on record and briefs March 16,
convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing June 3, 1992
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. ESTANISLAO VALDEZ VALDOVINOS, Appellant.
(9005-32899: CA A67277)
830 P2d 638
Elliot Holden, Portland, filed the brief for appellant.
Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Deits and Durham, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant was charged with delivery and possession of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992, both as part of a drug cultivation, manufacture or delivery scheme or network. He was sentenced under the sentencing guideline that involves a "scheme or network" factor. The state concedes that the sentence was improper. State v. Moeller, 105 Or App 434, 806 P2d 130, rev dismissed 312 Or 76, 815 P2d 701 (1991). We accept that concession. Because defendant challenges only the sentence imposed, we remand for resentencing.
Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing.