Case Name: Barbara SPENCER, Appellant, v. MACY'S CREDIT OPERATIONS, INC., and Division of Employment Security, Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2017-04-11
Citations: 515 S.W.3d 839
Docket Number: No. ED 104159
Parties: Barbara SPENCER, Appellant, v. MACY’S CREDIT OPERATIONS, INC., and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.
Judges: Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 515
Pages: 839–839

Head Matter:
Barbara SPENCER, Appellant, v. MACY’S CREDIT OPERATIONS, INC., and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.
No. ED 104159
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
FILED: April 11, 2017
Thomas H. Lake, Lake, Gantz, Lake & Price, LLC, Clayton, MO, for Appellant.
Meaghan Patricia Myers, Attorney for Division of Employment Security, Jefferson City, MO, Michael Corey Christman, Attorney for Mary’s Credit Operations, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.
Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Barbara Spencer appeals from the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission ("Commission") denying her claim for unemployment benefits after her termination from Mary's Credit Operations, Inc. because of misconduct connected with work. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The evidence in support of the Commission's order was not insufficient. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Commission's order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).