Case Name: Corey T. SNEED, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Rick JACKSON, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-12-10
Citations: 257 F. App'x 654
Docket Number: No. 07-6652
Parties: Corey T. SNEED, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Rick JACKSON, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before TRAXLER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 257
Pages: 654–654

Head Matter:
Corey T. SNEED, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Rick JACKSON, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 07-6652.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 6, 2007.
Decided Dec. 10, 2007.
Corey T. Sneed, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before TRAXLER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Corey T. Sneed appeals the district court's order denying his motion to resubmit his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sneed v. Jackson, No. 5:06-he-02099-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 10, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.