Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Curry Donnell INGRAM, a/k/a Peanut, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-08-14
Citations: 474 F. App'x 935
Docket Number: No. 12-6563
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Curry Donnell INGRAM, a/k/a Peanut, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 474
Pages: 935–935

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Curry Donnell INGRAM, a/k/a Peanut, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 12-6563.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 30, 2012.
Decided: Aug. 14, 2012.
Curry Donnell Ingram, Appellant Pro Se. Timothy Richard Murphy, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Curry Donnell Ingram appeals the district court's order denying his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Ingram, No. 4:01-cr-00081-RAJ-l (E.D.Va. Feb. 24, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.