Case Name: Louis MIANO, Plaintiff, v. AC & R ADVERTISING, INC., Defendant; Michael R. WIDENER, Plaintiff, v. AC & R ADVERTISING, INC., Defendant; Morton WEINSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. AC & R ADVERTISING, INC., Defendant
Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1993-08-19
Citations: 834 F. Supp. 632
Docket Number: Nos. 91 Civ. 1280 (LBS), 91 Civ. 1676 (LBS) and 91 Civ. 3906 (LBS)
Parties: Louis MIANO, Plaintiff, v. AC & R ADVERTISING, INC., Defendant. Michael R. WIDENER, Plaintiff, v. AC & R ADVERTISING, INC., Defendant. Morton WEINSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. AC & R ADVERTISING, INC., Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Supplement
Volume: 834
Pages: 632–633

Head Matter:
Louis MIANO, Plaintiff, v. AC & R ADVERTISING, INC., Defendant. Michael R. WIDENER, Plaintiff, v. AC & R ADVERTISING, INC., Defendant. Morton WEINSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. AC & R ADVERTISING, INC., Defendant.
Nos. 91 Civ. 1280 (LBS), 91 Civ. 1676 (LBS) and 91 Civ. 3906 (LBS).
United States District Court, S.D. New York.
Aug. 19, 1993.

Opinion:
'ENDORSEMENT
SAND, District Judge.
The Orders of Magistrate Judge Katz of Feb. 25, 1993, 148 F.R.D. 68, and of May 6, 1993 are adopted and approved.
The Court finds no error in Judge Katz's thoughtful and thorough opinion and ruling.
So Ordered.