Case Name: BOROUGH OF WOODCLIFF LAKE, APPELLANT, v. STATE BOARD OF TAX APPEALS ET AL., RESPONDENTS
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1936-10-02
Citations: 117 N.J.L. 114
Docket Number: 
Parties: BOROUGH OF WOODCLIFF LAKE, APPELLANT, v. STATE BOARD OF TAX APPEALS ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 117
Pages: 114–114

Head Matter:
BOROUGH OF WOODCLIFF LAKE, APPELLANT, v. STATE BOARD OF TAX APPEALS ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Argued May 28, 1936
Decided October 2, 1936.
For the appellant, Donald M. Waesche.
For the respondents, Chandless, Weller & Selser.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Lloyd, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 6.
For reversal — The Chief Justice, Heher, Perskie, JJ. 3.