Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Damian Antonio MURPHY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-09-14
Citations: 478 F. App'x 769
Docket Number: No. 12-7132
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Damian Antonio MURPHY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 478
Pages: 769–770

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Damian Antonio MURPHY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-7132.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 11, 2012.
Decided: Sept. 14, 2012.
Damian Antonio Murphy, Appellant Pro Se.
Jennifer R. Bockhorst, Assistant United States Attorney, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Damian Antonio Murphy appeals the district court's order denying his motion for the return of seized property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Murphy, No. 1:06-cr-00062-JPJ-1 (W.D.Va. June 11, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.