Case Name: Horton et al. v. Prendergast, Commissioner, Public Service Commission of the State of New York and Chairman, etc., et al.
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1929-01-07
Citations: 278 U.S. 579
Docket Number: No. 504
Parties: Horton et al. v. Prendergast, Commissioner, Public Service Commission of the State of New York and Chairman, etc., et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 278
Pages: 579–579

Head Matter:
No. 504.
Horton et al. v. Prendergast, Commissioner, Public Service Commission of the State of New York and Chairman, etc., et al.
January 7, 1929.
Mr. Allen S. Hobbard for appellants.
Messrs. Albert Ottinger, Albert J. Danaher, and Henry Purcell for appellees.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question on the authority of Offield v. New York, New Haven and Hartford R. R., 203 U. S. 372, 375; Mt. Vernon-Woodberry Cotton Duck Co. v. Alabama Interstate Power Co., 240 U. S. 30, 32.