Case Name: Iremonger vs. Newsam
Court: United States Circuit Court for the District of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 1793
Citations: 1 Mart. 260
Docket Number: 
Parties: Iremonger vs. Newsam.
Judges: Doderidge, J. assented.
Reporter: North Carolina Reports
Volume: 1
Pages: 261–263

Head Matter:
Iremonger vs. Newsam.
Hill. 3 Car.
LESSEE for years made his executor and died. The executor assigned over the term, and after the assignment, the rent was arrear, and the lessor brought debt against the executor.
Mason pro quærente.
There are three sorts of privities, 1. Of estate. 2. Of contract. 3. Of estate and contract.
Where there is a privity of contract; it is not determined by the assignment over of the estate to another; as in the case of Overt and Sidhal. But in 3 Rep. 23 Walker’s case, the very case is said to be adjudged, while revera, it was not adjudged, as appears by the book of entry.
Cook. As to Turpin’s case; there also put, it never was adjudged, as appears by the roll. In this *case there is a privity of contract, between the lessor and the executor of theleffee. For the executor reprefents the perfon of the teftator. 28 H. 8. Dyer I4. termor covenants to build a new houfe, the term expires and the lessee dies, his execut- or shall be charged. 26 H. 7. 18. Lessee covenants to repair the house and dies, the executor is bound. 5 Rep. 17. Spencer’s case. Lessee for a term of a flock of sheep, covenants for him and his assigns; covenant does not lie against his assignee, for it is personal, but it binds his executor. Com. 168. Lessor covenants to build a new house, for the lessee, and his assigns, the executor is assignee. H. 15 Jac. C. B. rot. 3068. Sir Christopher Heydon brought debt against Hudson, executor of the lessee for years, for rent arrear; the executor pleaded that he had not agreed to take the term; but the plaintiff had judgment; for, inasmuch as he has taken on himself the office of executor, he cannot refuse the term. P. 17 Jac. B. R. rot. 346. Manly vs. Moody. Debt against executors, they plead plene administrav. all the goods, except a term, which they refused: and judgment against them. Contra. 21 H. 6. 24.
per Ascue. Those cases prove that the executor is not in, as assignee, for then he might avoid and wave the term; but that he is in, by a privity of contract.
2. The executor does not plead that he has given notice of the assignment, and tendered the arrearages. 8 H. 6. 10. 8 E. 4. 12. 47 E. 3. 4. where the act of the party shall not change the avowry, without notice; aliter, the act of the law. The action of the lord is not altered by the feoffment of the tenant without notice. Bro. Avowry 111. Parceners make partition without notice given, the avowry of the lord continues on them jointly. 2 E. 4. 6. 34 H. 6. 4. e contra. Otherwise, if the tenant, after feoffment, dies. 3 Rep. 14. There notice was pleaded and accepted accordingly. Also, the executor had not pleaded that he had not assets, for the personal estate is bound by the contract. 8 Rep. 133. 9 Rep. 90.
3 The executor has no power to change the action of the lessor by his assignment; otherwise great inconvenience would ensue; for, by this means, he might waste the land and make it barren, and then, assign it to some indigent person. Perhaps there is a difference, if the lessee himself assigns; perhaps debt does not lie against an executor.
Minge, e contra,
cited the cases of Sidhal and Turpin, ut supra.
Noy, quære? quia the executor represents the person of the testator. Sir Thomas Waller’s *case. 10 Jac. B. R. A freeman of London imported goods, made his executor and died; held that the prisage shall not be paid by the executor.
Doderidge, J. assented.

Opinion:
Jones, J.
It has been adjudged that the heir of the lessor, by reason of the privity, cannot maintain debt against the first lessee, after the assignment of the term.
Noy. This differs from Turpin's case: for here is no acceptance; the lessor shall not have debt against the lessee after the acceptance of the assignee. Sidhal's case has never been resolved. Popham was always of a contrary opinion. The prebend lessor being a single corporation, the personal contract determined by his death; as a lease by Dean and Chapter, and the Dean died.
Noy. On a lease for years in London, of lands in Kent, the lessor shall have debt against the executor in London; for the privity of the contract remains.
Doderidge, J.
If the lessee himself had assigned, the executor should be charged.
Noy. Perhaps so.
Jones, J. For arrearages in the life of the testator.