Case Name: Robert Dean HARROD, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1974-08-19
Citations: 513 S.W.2d 471
Docket Number: No. 9667
Parties: Robert Dean HARROD, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: All concur.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 513
Pages: 471–471

Head Matter:
Robert Dean HARROD, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 9667.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Springfield District.
Aug. 19, 1974.
Philip M. Moomaw, Dan L. Birdsong, Rolla, for movant-appellant.
John C. Danforth, Atty. Gen., Preston Dean, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
The sufficiency of the complaint, verification of the information, and sufficiency of the trial evidence, are not subject to attack in Rule 27.26, V.A.M.R., proceedings. The judgment of the Pulaski County Circuit Court denying post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16, V.A.M.R.
All concur.