Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher Andaryl WILLS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-09-25
Citations: 46 F. App'x 703
Docket Number: No. 02-6454
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher Andaryl WILLS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 46
Pages: 703–704

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher Andaryl WILLS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-6454.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 28, 2002.
Decided Sept. 25, 2002.
Christopher Andaryl Wills, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Michael DiBiagio, Tarra R. DeShields-Minnis, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Christopher Andaryl Wills seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude on the reasoning of the district court that Wills has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See United States v. Wills, Nos. CR-99-52-S; CA-02-119-S (D.Md. Jan. 14, 2002). Accordingly, we deny Wills' motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.