Case Name: Charles CLAIR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John DOE, Clerk of the States Attorney's Office of St. Mary's County, MD; John Doe, Clerk of Circuit Court of St. Mary's County, MD, Defendants-Appellees, and Thomas V. Mike Miller, Jr., Attorney; Peter O'Neil, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-11-21
Citations: 670 F. App'x 774
Docket Number: No. 16-1585
Parties: Charles CLAIR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John DOE, Clerk of the States Attorney’s Office of St. Mary’s County, MD; John Doe, Clerk of Circuit Court of St. Mary’s County, MD, Defendants-Appellees, and Thomas V. Mike Miller, Jr., Attorney; Peter O’Neil, Defendants.
Judges: Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 670
Pages: 774–775

Head Matter:
Charles CLAIR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John DOE, Clerk of the States Attorney’s Office of St. Mary’s County, MD; John Doe, Clerk of Circuit Court of St. Mary’s County, MD, Defendants-Appellees, and Thomas V. Mike Miller, Jr., Attorney; Peter O’Neil, Defendants.
No. 16-1585
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: November 4, 2016
Decided: November 21, 2016
Charles Clair, Appellant Pro Se. Brian E. Frosh, Attorney General, Jennifer L. Katz, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Charles Clair appeals the district court's orders granting the motion to dismiss his amended complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Clair v. Doe, No. 8:14-cv-00713-PWG, 2016 WL 374097 (D. Md. Apr. 29, 2016; Feb. 1, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED