Case Name: Christopher WHITE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2007-05-22
Citations: 223 S.W.3d 186
Docket Number: No. ED 89052
Parties: Christopher WHITE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 223
Pages: 186–187

Head Matter:
Christopher WHITE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 89052.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
May 22, 2007.
John K. Tucci, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, Stephanie L. Wan, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Christopher White, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).