Case Name: THE SADDLE RIVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL AND CHESTNUT RIDGE LAND CO., INC., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. THE BOROUGH OF SADDLE RIVER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT; WILLIAM C. WOLLEN, ET ALS., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE SADDLE RIVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL AND CHESTNUT RIDGE LAND CO., INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1959-04-07
Citations: 29 N.J. 468
Docket Number: 
Parties: THE SADDLE RIVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL AND CHESTNUT RIDGE LAND CO., INC., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. THE BOROUGH OF SADDLE RIVER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. WILLIAM C. WOLLEN, ET ALS., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE SADDLE RIVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL AND CHESTNUT RIDGE LAND CO., INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 29
Pages: 468–468

Head Matter:
THE SADDLE RIVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL AND CHESTNUT RIDGE LAND CO., INC., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. THE BOROUGH OF SADDLE RIVER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. WILLIAM C. WOLLEN, ET ALS., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE SADDLE RIVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL AND CHESTNUT RIDGE LAND CO., INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Argued March 16, 1959
Decided April 7, 1959.
Mr. Fred 0. Stichel, III and Mr. John J. Breslin, Jr. argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. Breslin & Breslin, attorneys for William C. Wollen et als.; Messrs. Stichel & Stichel, attorneys for Borough of Saddle River).
Mr. James A. Major argued the cause for the respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Hall in the court below.
For affirmance—Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Burling, Jacobs, Prancis and Proctor—5.
For reversal—Hone.