Case Name: Daniel Johnson WILLIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Jones County Improvement Association, Incorporated, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION; Lyndo Tippett; Cam McRae, as public official; Jay Converse, as private individuals and/or their successors; Tands Incorporation, as private individuals and/or their successors, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-11-18
Citations: 300 F. App'x 203
Docket Number: No. 08-1054
Parties: Daniel Johnson WILLIS, Plaintiff—Appellant, and Jones County Improvement Association, Incorporated, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION; Lyndo Tippett; Cam McRae, as public official; Jay Converse, as private individuals and/or their successors; Tands Incorporation, as private individuals and/or their successors, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 300
Pages: 203–203

Head Matter:
Daniel Johnson WILLIS, Plaintiff—Appellant, and Jones County Improvement Association, Incorporated, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION; Lyndo Tippett; Cam McRae, as public official; Jay Converse, as private individuals and/or their successors; Tands Incorporation, as private individuals and/or their successors, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 08-1054.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 13, 2008.
Decided: Nov. 18, 2008.
Daniel Johnson Willis, Appellant Pro Se. Scott A. Conklin, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina; Nicole A. Crawford, Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Daniel Johnson Willis appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Willis v. Dep't of Transp., No. 4:07-cv-00046-FL, 2007 WL 4380098 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 12, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.