Case Name: Depew et al., Appellants, v. Ogella, Appellee
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1994-07-27
Citations: 69 Ohio St. 3d 610
Docket Number: No. 94-742
Parties: Depew et al., Appellants, v. Ogella, Appellee.
Judges: AM. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 69
Pages: 610–611

Head Matter:
Depew et al., Appellants, v. Ogella, Appellee.
[Cite as Depew v. Ogella (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 610.]
(No. 94-742
Submitted June 15, 1994
Decided July 27, 1994.)
Layboume, Smith, Gore & Goldsmith, A. Russell Smith, Robert B. Layboume and Joy S. Wagner, for appellants.
Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs Co., L.P.A., and David W. Hilkert, for appellee.

Opinion:
The motion to certify the record is allowed, the judgment on appeal is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court on authority of Sorrell v. Thevenir (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 415, 633 N.E.2d 504.
AM. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Moyer, C.J., concurs separately.
Wright, J., dissents.