Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jackie McCONNELL, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-03-25
Citations: 30 F. App'x 325
Docket Number: No. 01-7959
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jackie McCONNELL, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 30
Pages: 325–326

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jackie McCONNELL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 01-7959.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 14, 2002.
Decided March 25, 2002.
Jackie McConnell, Appellant Pro Se. Sara Elizabeth Flannery, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Jackie McConnell seeks to appeal the district court's order declining to reconsider the prior order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. McConnell, Nos. CR-97-269; CA-00-705-3 (E.D.Va. Oct. 4, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.