Case Name: Cheryl SMITH, Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS and Division of Employment Security, Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-06-05
Citations: 45 S.W.3d 930
Docket Number: No. ED 78422
Parties: Cheryl SMITH, Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, Sr., P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 45
Pages: 930–930

Head Matter:
Cheryl SMITH, Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.
No. ED 78422.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
June 5, 2001.
Lee Clayton Goodman, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Larry R. Ruhmann, St. Louis, MO, for respondents.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, Sr., P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Cheryl E. Smith appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the decision of the Appeals Referee of the Division of Employment Security pursuant to Section 288.210 RSMo 1994. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. We have, however, provided the parties with a brief memorandum, for their use only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a brief memorandum for their use only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).