Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Eugene Kealey, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1973-12-27
Citations: 33 N.Y.2d 897
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Eugene Kealey, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 33
Pages: 897–897

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Eugene Kealey, Appellant.
Submitted December 10, 1973;
decided December 27, 1973.

Opinion:
Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following; Upon appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon the following question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Defendant-appellant argued that he had been denied due process of law because the statute under which he was convicted (Penal Law, § 125.10) is unconstitutionally vague. The Court of Appeals held that appellant's constitutional rights were not violated. [See 33 N Y 2d 818.]