Case Name: Edward Hyslop, Respondent, v. Mobil Oil Corporation, Appellant. (Action No. 1.); Edward Hyslop, Respondent, v. Petr-All Petroleum Corporation, Appellant. (Action No. 2.)
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2003-02-07
Citations: 302 A.D.2d 1017
Docket Number: 
Parties: Edward Hyslop, Respondent, v Mobil Oil Corporation, Appellant. (Action No. 1.) Edward Hyslop, Respondent, v Petr-All Petroleum Corporation, Appellant. (Action No. 2.)
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 302
Pages: 1017–1017

Head Matter:
Edward Hyslop, Respondent, v Mobil Oil Corporation, Appellant. (Action No. 1.) Edward Hyslop, Respondent, v Petr-All Petroleum Corporation, Appellant. (Action No. 2.)
[753 NYS2d 416]

Opinion:
Motion and cross motion for renewal granted and, upon renewal, ordering paragraph and memorandum of memorandum and order entered July 3, 2002 (296 AD2d 827) are amended by providing that the order appealed from is modified on the law by granting those parts of defendants' motions seeking summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 241 (6) cause of action and dismissing that cause of action (see Nagel v D & R Realty Corp., 99 NY2d 98) and as modified the order is affirmed with costs to plaintiff. Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Kehoe, Gorski, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.