Case Name: Arturo and Esther ALCANTARA, Appellant, v. ROLLINS, INC., d/b/a Rollins Protective Services Company, Inc., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1983-08-02
Citations: 435 So. 2d 403
Docket Number: No. 82-2683
Parties: Arturo and Esther ALCANTARA, Appellant, v. ROLLINS, INC., d/b/a Rollins Protective Services Company, Inc., Appellee.
Judges: Before HUBBART, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 435
Pages: 403–403

Head Matter:
Arturo and Esther ALCANTARA, Appellant, v. ROLLINS, INC., d/b/a Rollins Protective Services Company, Inc., Appellee.
No. 82-2683.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Aug. 2, 1983.
Bruce M. Boiko, Coral Gables, and Debbi Lansberg, for appellant.
Walton, Lantaff, Schroeder & Carson and Charles A. Williams, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
Before HUBBART, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Mankap Enterprises, Inc. v. Wells Fargo Alarm Services, 427 So.2d 332 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Continental Video Corp. v. Honeywell, Inc., 422 So.2d 35 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Ace Formal Wear, Inc. v. Baker Protective Service, Inc., 416 So.2d 8 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); L. Luria & Son, Inc. v. Alarmtec International Corp., 384 So.2d 947 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).