Case Name: WALKER v. GOETZ
Court: Texas Courts of Civil Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1920-01-22
Citations: 218 S.W. 571
Docket Number: No. 1043
Parties: WALKER v. GOETZ.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 218
Pages: 571–571

Head Matter:
WALKER v. GOETZ.
(No. 1043.)
(Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. El Paso.
Jan. 22, 1920.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 12, 1920.)
Error from Midland County Court; J. M. De Armond, Judge.
Action by Chas. E. Goetz against Mrs. John Walker. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
Affirmed.
G.arrard & Baker, of Midland, for plaintiff in error.
B. Frank Haag, of' Midland, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
WALTHALL, J.
This is a companion case to the case of Mrs. John Walker v. C. E. Goetz, 218 S. W. 569, this day decided by this court. The pleadings of both parties, the evidence, and the proceedings had herein are practically the same as in the former case, except that in this case the husband did not join the wife in the execution of the promissory note, and, as required by articles 1840 and 1841, Vernon's Sayles' Civil Statutes, as to the husband, while joined in the suit with the wife, no judgment whs rendered against him.
The judgment is affirmed.