Case Name: SELIGMAN v. HAHN
Court: New York City Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1893-06-19
Citations: 23 N.Y.S. 969
Docket Number: 
Parties: SELIGMAN v. HAHN.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 23
Pages: 969–970

Head Matter:
SELIGMAN v. HAHN.
(City Court of New York,
General Term.
June 19, 1893.)
Appeal—Record—Entire Evidence.
Questions of fact will not be reviewed in the absence of a certificate that all evidence is in the record.
Appeal from trial term.
Action by David Seligman against Isaac Hahn. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
Affirmed.
Argued before VAN WYCK and FITZSIMONS, JJ:
H. M. Whitehead, for appellant.
Epstein Bros., for respondent.

Opinion:
FITZSIMONS, J.
The appeal record does not contain the usual certificate, stating that it contains all the evidence given upon the trial. We must therefore decline to review questions of fact. We find no errors of law, and judgment must be affirmed, with costs.