Case Name: Edward C. TIETIG, Appellant, v. The DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION of the State of Florida, et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1973-03-28
Citations: 276 So. 2d 97
Docket Number: No. 72-702
Parties: Edward C. TIETIG, Appellant, v. The DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION of the State of Florida, et al., Appellees.
Judges: CROSS, OWEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 276
Pages: 97–98

Head Matter:
Edward C. TIETIG, Appellant, v. The DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION of the State of Florida, et al., Appellees.
No. 72-702.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
March 28, 1973.
Rehearing Denied April 27, 1973.
Ben J. Weaver, Jr., and Don G. Nicholson of Nicholson, Howard, Brawner & Lovett, Miami, for appellant.
David J. Kadyk and Ted R. Manry, III, of MacFarlane, Ferguson, Allison & Kelly, Tampa, for appellee-Watson and Co.
Karl V. Hart and Lawrence R. Metsch of Shutts & Bowen, Miami, for appellees-Zinke-Smith, Inc. and Reliance Ins. Co.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
A review of the recent cases discussing the criteria to be applied in determining the adequacy of the complaint compels us to the conclusion that the complaint m the case sub judice contains sufficient allegations to state a cause of action against the defendants. Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. Walters, Fla.1971, 246 So.2d 563; Iorio v. Layman, Fla.App.1971, 256 So.2d 26; Bond v. Koscot Interplanetary, Inc., Fla.App. 1971, 246 So.2d 631.
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
Reversed and remanded.
CROSS, OWEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.