Case Name: Penko v. Lake Cty.
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2005-04-13
Citations: 105 Ohio St. 3d 1494
Docket Number: 2005-0225
Parties: Penko v. Lake Cty.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Resnicic, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 105
Pages: 1494–1494

Head Matter:
2005-0225.
Penko v. Lake Cty.

Opinion:
In Quo Warranto. On motions to dismiss and motion for leave to amend complaint. Motions to dismiss sustained. Motion for leave to amend complaint denied as moot. Cause dismissed.
Moyer, C.J., Resnicic, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.