Case Name: P.J., individually and as parent and natural guardian of J.J., a minor, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Curtis GORDON, Judy Artis, individually and in her official capacity, Dwight Bernard, individually and in his official capacity, Smart School, Inc., Defendants, School Board of Broward County, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-04-04
Citations: 174 F. App'x 504
Docket Number: No. 05-11482; D.C. Docket No. 04-61230-CV-UUB
Parties: P.J., individually and as parent and natural guardian of J.J., a minor, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Curtis GORDON, Judy Artis, individually and in her official capacity, Dwight Bernard, individually and in his official capacity, Smart School, Inc., Defendants, School Board of Broward County, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 174
Pages: 504–504

Head Matter:
P.J., individually and as parent and natural guardian of J.J., a minor, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Curtis GORDON, Judy Artis, individually and in her official capacity, Dwight Bernard, individually and in his official capacity, Smart School, Inc., Defendants, School Board of Broward County, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 05-11482.
D.C. Docket No. 04-61230-CV-UUB.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
April 4, 2006.
Ellen Novoseletsky, Dinah S. Stein, Hicks & Kneale, P.A., Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Marylin C. Batista, Edward J. Marko, School Board Attorney’s Office, Ft. Laud-erdale, FL, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before TJOFLAT and HULL, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI, Judge.
Honorable Jane A. Restani, United States Court of International Trade Chief Judge, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The parties announced during oral argument that all the federal claims in this case have been settled and that the only claim that remains in this case is a state law negligence claim against only the defendant School Board of Broward County. This state law claim presents issues of first impression best resolved by Florida state courts. Because the district court may decide not to exercise its supplemental jurisdiction over that state law claim, we vacate the district court's order dated January 21, 2005 (Docket #23) and the district court's order dated March 8, 2005 (Docket # 26), certifying that January 2005 order for appeal, and remand this case for further proceedings in the district court in light of the settlement.
VACATED and REMANDED.
. While the district court's March 8, 2005 order refers to its January 21, 2005 order as its January 23, 2005 order, it is clear from that docket sheet that the order certified is the January 21, 2005 order.