Case Name: Charles Scribner, Appellant, v. Joseph R. Cottone et al., Respondents, and Maynard W. Sullivan et al., Appellants. Joseph R. Cottone et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Carl Van Keuren, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant. Maynard W. Sullivan, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carl Van Keuren, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant. Mary Warner, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carl Van Keuren, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant. Edgar Bush et al., Copartners Doing Business as Bush & Snyder, Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Carl Van Keuren, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1954-12-02
Citations: 284 A.D. 1069
Docket Number: 
Parties: Charles Scribner, Appellant, v. Joseph R. Cottone et al., Respondents, and Maynard W. Sullivan et al., Appellants. Joseph R. Cottone et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Carl Van Keuren, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant. Maynard W. Sullivan, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carl Van Keuren, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant. Mary Warner, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carl Van Keuren, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant. Edgar Bush et al., Copartners Doing Business as Bush & Snyder, Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Carl Van Keuren, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 284
Pages: 1069–1069

Head Matter:
Third Department,
December, 1954.
(December 2, 1954.)
Charles Scribner, Appellant, v. Joseph R. Cottone et al., Respondents, and Maynard W. Sullivan et al., Appellants. Joseph R. Cottone et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Carl Van Keuren, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant. Maynard W. Sullivan, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carl Van Keuren, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant. Mary Warner, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carl Van Keuren, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant. Edgar Bush et al., Copartners Doing Business as Bush & Snyder, Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Carl Van Keuren, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

Opinion:
Motion to modify judgment, with respect to costs. Order and judgment should be entered in accordance with the memorandum including a single bill of costs in this court. In the event that a foreclosure sale should become necessary the usual costs in such an action may be taxed in the court below. Present — Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Halpem and Zeller, JJ. [See ante, p. 1007.]