Case Name: FALK, Appellant, v. R. R. APPLETON CO., Respondent
Court: New York City Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1900-03-02
Citations: 62 N.Y.S. 1136
Docket Number: 
Parties: FALK, Appellant, v. R. R. APPLETON CO., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 62
Pages: 1136–1136

Head Matter:
FALK, Appellant, v. R. R. APPLETON CO., Respondent.
(City Court of New York, General Term.
March 2, 1900.)
Action by Benno Falk against the R. R. Appleton Company. From a judgment dismissing complaint, with costs, ' plaintiff appeals. Reversed. Wayland E. Benjamin, for appellant. Chittenden & Fiero, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The proof offered of the written assignment was competent, but, even without that proof, there was sufficient evidence in the case of the assignment, without regard to the written instrument, and it was for the alleged failure of this proof that the complaint was dismissed. This was error, which requires that the judgment be reversed. Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.