Case Name: Joshua James FROST, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ron VAN BOENING, Superintendent, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-02-25
Citations: 707 F.3d 1143
Docket Number: No. 11-35114
Parties: Joshua James FROST, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ron VAN BOENING, Superintendent, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 707
Pages: 1143–1143

Head Matter:
Joshua James FROST, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ron VAN BOENING, Superintendent, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 11-35114.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Feb. 25, 2013.
Erik B. Levin, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Corey Endo, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner-Appellant.
John Joseph Samson, Assistant Attorney General, Attorney General’s Office, Olympia, WA, for Respondent-Appellee.
D.C. No. 2:09-ev-00725-TSZ.

Opinion:
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.