Case Name: Brad R. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Randall BRYANT; Doris Cubitt, CPA; Malane S. Pike, Esq.; Mark T. Hobbs, CPA; Gary F. Forte; Bobby R. Creech, Jr., CPA; Donald H. Burkett, CPA; Anthony A. Callander, CPA; Wendell Lunsford, PA; John F. Camp, CPA, Defendants-Appellees, and Henry D. McMaster, Defendant; Brad R. Johnson, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doris Cubitt, CPA; A. Able, CPA; B. Baker, CPA; C. Charlie, CPA, Defendants-Appellees, and Lewis V. Hall, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-06-06
Citations: 474 F. App'x 105
Docket Number: Nos. 12-1055, 12-1057
Parties: Brad R. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Randall BRYANT; Doris Cubitt, CPA; Malane S. Pike, Esq.; Mark T. Hobbs, CPA; Gary F. Forte; Bobby R. Creech, Jr., CPA; Donald H. Burkett, CPA; Anthony A. Callander, CPA; Wendell Lunsford, PA; John F. Camp, CPA, Defendants-Appellees, and Henry D. McMaster, Defendant. Brad R. Johnson, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doris Cubitt, CPA; A. Able, CPA; B. Baker, CPA; C. Charlie, CPA, Defendants-Appellees, and Lewis V. Hall, Defendant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 474
Pages: 105–106

Head Matter:
Brad R. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Randall BRYANT; Doris Cubitt, CPA; Malane S. Pike, Esq.; Mark T. Hobbs, CPA; Gary F. Forte; Bobby R. Creech, Jr., CPA; Donald H. Burkett, CPA; Anthony A. Callander, CPA; Wendell Lunsford, PA; John F. Camp, CPA, Defendants-Appellees, and Henry D. McMaster, Defendant. Brad R. Johnson, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doris Cubitt, CPA; A. Able, CPA; B. Baker, CPA; C. Charlie, CPA, Defendants-Appellees, and Lewis V. Hall, Defendant.
Nos. 12-1055, 12-1057.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 18, 2012.
Decided: June 6, 2012.
Brad R. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Jerome Scott Kozacki, Willcox Buyck & Williams, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Brad R. Johnson appeals the district court's orders granting summary judgment to the Appellants and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the records and the district court's orders and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See Johnson v. Bryant, Nos. 3:09-cv-00102-TLW; 4:08-cv-02726-TLW, 2011 WL 4483642 (D.S.C. Sept. 28, 2011); (Dec. 14, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.