Case Name: STATE ex Hollo v. INDUST COMM.
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1929-10-23
Citations: 7 Ohio Law Abs. 639
Docket Number: No. 21903
Parties: STATE ex Hollo v INDUST COMM.
Judges: Marshall, CJ., Kinkade and Matthias, JJ., concur. Robinson and Jones, JJ., not participating.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 7
Pages: 639–640

Head Matter:
STATE ex Hollo v INDUST COMM.
Ohio Supreme Court
No. 21903.
Decided Oct. 23, 1929

Opinion:
Syllabus by
DAY, J.
EMPLOYER & EMPLOYE
(250 lb) While an award made under the Industrial Commission Act for an injury . to an employe and an additional award made for violation of a specific requirement causing such injury, are separate and distinct awards, yet, growing out of the same probative facts and affecting the same parties, they are to be regarded as so interdependent that the Commission, under the discretion given it by 1465-86 GC, may make such modifications or changes with reference to either of said awards as in its opinion are justified.
Marshall, CJ., Kinkade and Matthias, JJ., concur. Robinson and Jones, JJ., not participating.