Case Name: Mary K. O'Connell, Appellant, v. Max Jacobs et al., Individually and as Parents and Natural Guardians of Seth Jacobs, an Infant, Defendants, and Seth Jacobs, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1993-02-11
Citations: 81 N.Y.2d 797
Docket Number: 
Parties: Mary K. O’Connell, Appellant, v Max Jacobs et al., Individually and as Parents and Natural Guardians of Seth Jacobs, an Infant, Defendants, and Seth Jacobs, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 81
Pages: 797–798

Head Matter:
Mary K. O’Connell, Appellant, v Max Jacobs et al., Individually and as Parents and Natural Guardians of Seth Jacobs, an Infant, Defendants, and Seth Jacobs, Respondent.
Argued January 7, 1993;
decided February 11, 1993
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Dempsey & Dempsey, Buffalo (Helen Kaney Dempsey and James C. Sloan of counsel), for appellant.
Saperston & Day, P. C., Buffalo (Neil A. Goldberg and Lawrence A. Schulz of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs. We agree for the reasons stated by the Appellate Division (181 AD2d 1064) that the admissible evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict.
Concur: Acting Chief Judge Simons and Judges Kaye, Ti-tone, Hancock, Jr., Bellacosa and Smith.