Case Name: Vito Cucuzza, Respondent, v. Frank A. Vaccaro, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff. Robert Beuthe, Doing Business as Beuthe Excavating, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1986-03-20
Citations: 67 N.Y.2d 825
Docket Number: 
Parties: Vito Cucuzza, Respondent, v Frank A. Vaccaro, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff. Robert Beuthe, Doing Business as Beuthe Excavating, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 67
Pages: 825–828

Head Matter:
Vito Cucuzza, Respondent, v Frank A. Vaccaro, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff. Robert Beuthe, Doing Business as Beuthe Excavating, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.
Decided March 20, 1986
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Mark A. Longo for appellant.
Jack H. Dorfman for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Charles B. Lawrence at the Appellate Division (109 AD2d 101). (See also, Duffy v Horton Mem. Hosp., 66 NY2d 473). Question certified answered in the affirmative.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander and Hancock, Jr. Taking no part: Judge Titone.