Case Name: Daisy G. BISZ and Michael and Ann Scully, Appellants, v. Florida DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE and Consumer Services, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2001-11-14
Citations: 802 So. 2d 385
Docket Number: Nos. 3D00-3211, 3D00-3173
Parties: Daisy G. BISZ and Michael and Ann Scully, Appellants, v. Florida DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE and Consumer Services, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., FLETCHER, JJ„ and NESBITT, Senior Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 802
Pages: 385–385

Head Matter:
Daisy G. BISZ and Michael and Ann Scully, Appellants, v. Florida DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE and Consumer Services, Appellee.
Nos. 3D00-3211, 3D00-3173.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 14, 2001.
Daisy G. Bisz; Michael Scully and Ann Scully, in proper persons.
Adorno & Zeder and Wesley R. Parsons and Jack R. Reiter, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., FLETCHER, JJ„ and NESBITT, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Environmental Trust v. Florida Dep't of Environmental Protection, 714 So.2d 493 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)("An agency statement explaining how an existing rule of general applicability will be applied in a particular set of facts is not itself a rule.").