Case Name: Banoro GARRETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. T.R. WOODS; M. Ferrell; Smith; Norfolk Sheriffs Office, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-07-16
Citations: 39 F. App'x 930
Docket Number: No. 02-6666
Parties: Banoro GARRETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. T.R. WOODS; M. Ferrell; Smith; Norfolk Sheriffs Office, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 39
Pages: 930–930

Head Matter:
Banoro GARRETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. T.R. WOODS; M. Ferrell; Smith; Norfolk Sheriffs Office, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 02-6666.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted June 26, 2002.
Decided July 16, 2002.
Banoro Garrett, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Lawrence Dumville, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Banoro Garrett appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court, but modify the district court's order dismissing Garrett's claim against Smith to reflect a dismissal without prejudice. Garrett v. Woods, No. CA-01-776-2 (E.D.Va. Apr. 22, 2002). We deny Garrett's motion for a transcript at government expense, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED