Case Name: Roger MATTES, Appellant at No, 90, v. Lewis KATES; Roger MATTES, Individually and Mattes & Mattes, P.C., Appellants at No. 91, v. Jerome BARTH, Audrey Barth, West Mountain Poultry Company and Lewis Kates
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1996-12-30
Citations: 546 Pa. 461
Docket Number: 
Parties: Roger MATTES, Appellant at No, 90, v. Lewis KATES. Roger MATTES, Individually and Mattes & Mattes, P.C., Appellants at No. 91, v. Jerome BARTH, Audrey Barth, West Mountain Poultry Company and Lewis Kates.
Judges: Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO and NEWMAN, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 546
Pages: 461–461

Head Matter:
686 A.2d 392
Roger MATTES, Appellant at No, 90, v. Lewis KATES. Roger MATTES, Individually and Mattes & Mattes, P.C., Appellants at No. 91, v. Jerome BARTH, Audrey Barth, West Mountain Poultry Company and Lewis Kates.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Dec. 30, 1996.
Eugene F. Hickey, II, Scranton, for Roger Mattes.
Andrew E. Forshay, Philadelphia, for Lewis Kates, Jerome Barth, et ai.
Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO and NEWMAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appeals dismissed as having been improvidently granted.
CAPPY and NIGRO, JJ., dissent and would reach the merits of the case.