Case Name: Hugh Graham v. The State
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1926-06-23
Citations: 105 Tex. Crim. 186
Docket Number: No. 10277
Parties: Hugh Graham v. The State.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Criminal Reports
Volume: 105
Pages: 186–189

Head Matter:
Hugh Graham v. The State.
No. 10277.
Delivered June 23, 1926.
Rehearing granted October 20, 1926.
The opinion states the case.
Perkins & Perkins, Nat Patton, and Adams & Adams, for appellant.
On misconduct of jury, appellant cites:
McWilliams v. State, 22 S. W. 970.
Terry v. State, 38 S. W. 938.
Blocker v. State, 61 S. W. 393.
Tutt v. State, 91 S. W. 585.
Sam D. Stinson, State’s Attorney, and Robert M. Lyles, Assistant State’s Attorney, for the State.

Opinion:
BAKER, Judge.
The appellant was convicted in the District Court of Cherokee County for unlawfully possessing equipment for the purpose of manufacturing intoxicating liquor, and his punishment assessed at one year in the penitentiary.
The record fails to disclose any sentence of the court in this case, in the absence of which this court is without jurisdiction or authority to consider the appeal. Art. 769 (856), C. C. P.; Branch's Ann. P. C., Sec. 667; Wooldridge v. State, 61 Tex. Crim. Rep. 324, 135 S. W. 124; Carroll v. State, 83 Tex. Crim. Rep. 536, 204 S. W. 334; Thompkins v. State, 87 Tex. Crim. Rep. 502, 222 S. W. 1103.
For the reason above mentioned, this appeal is ordered dismissed.
Dismissed.
The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.