Case Name: THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWARK ET AL., PROSECUTORS AND DEFENDANTS IN ERROR, v. JOSEPH W. PLUME, DEFENDANT, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1911-11-20
Citations: 82 N.J.L. 534
Docket Number: 
Parties: THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWARK ET AL., PROSECUTORS AND DEFENDANTS IN ERROR, v. JOSEPH W. PLUME, DEFENDANT, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 82
Pages: 534–534

Head Matter:
THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWARK ET AL., PROSECUTORS AND DEFENDANTS IN ERROR, v. JOSEPH W. PLUME, DEFENDANT, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Submitted July 10, 1911
Decided November 20, 1911.
On error to the Supreme Court.
Por the plaintiff in error, John B. Hardin and Bobert H. McCarter.
Por the defendant in error, Herbert Boggs.

Opinion:
Pee Cubiam.
This case was argued with the case of Newark v. Tunis, ante p. 461, decided at the present term. It is similar in its essential facts, and is controlled by the decision in the Tunis case. Por the reasons given in the opinion filed in that case, the judgment of the Supreme Court will be affirmed.
For aiffirmance—The Chanoellob, Chief Justice, Tbehchaed, Paekee, Beegen, Bogeet, Vbedenbuegh, Congdon, White, JJ. 9.
For reversal—None.