Case Name: James Paul BASH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Thomas MADDOCK, Director of Corrections; Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-02-22
Citations: 4 F. App'x 487
Docket Number: No. 98-56730; D.C. No. CV-98-01909-WMB
Parties: James Paul BASH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Thomas MADDOCK, Director of Corrections; Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: Before HUG, FERGUSON, Circuit Judges, RESTANI , Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 4
Pages: 487–488

Head Matter:
James Paul BASH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Thomas MADDOCK, Director of Corrections; Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 98-56730.
D.C. No. CV-98-01909-WMB.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 4, 2000.
Decided Feb. 22, 2001.
Before HUG, FERGUSON, Circuit Judges, RESTANI , Judge.
. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
. Honorable Jane A. Restani, Judge, United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
ORDER
The United States Supreme Court California has rendered its decision in Artuz v. Bennett, 531 U.S. 4, 121 S.Ct. 361, 148 L.Ed.2d 213 (2000).
Therefore this case is resubmitted for decision.
MEMORANDUM
The order of the district court dismissing the petition of habeas corpus is reversed and the case is remanded to the district court for reconsideration pursuant to Artuz v. Bennett, 531 U.S. 4, 121 S.Ct. 361, 148 L.Ed.2d 213 (2000)
REVERSED and REMANDED.
. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.