Case Name: Sarah HARRIS, Appellant, v. Edgar A. SOULES and Leona Soules, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1982-06-30
Citations: 416 So. 2d 1186
Docket Number: No. AG-429
Parties: Sarah HARRIS, Appellant, v. Edgar A. SOULES and Leona Soules, Appellees.
Judges: ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., C. J., and ERVIN and SHAW, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 416
Pages: 1186–1186

Head Matter:
Sarah HARRIS, Appellant, v. Edgar A. SOULES and Leona Soules, Appellees.
No. AG-429.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
June 30, 1982.
Rehearing Denied Aug. 11, 1982.
Andrew J. Decker, III, of Airth, Sellers & Lewis, Live Oak, for appellant.
William R. Slaughter, II, of Slaughter & Slaughter, Live Oak, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The trial court properly found that appellant failed to adduce competent evidence of a boundary dispute or uncertainty by the parties or their predecessors which was resolved by establishing a boundary through agreement or acquiescence. See King v. Carden, 237 So.2d 26 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970). The order granting judgment notwithstanding the jury's verdict is
AFFIRMED.
ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., C. J., and ERVIN and SHAW, JJ., concur.