Case Name: Robert A. WALTERS v. SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, et al., Appellants. Richard A. Gusimano
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Decision Date: 1984-03-15
Citations: 237 U.S. App. D.C. 333
Docket Number: No. 82-2089
Parties: Robert A. WALTERS v. SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, et al., Appellants. Richard A. Gusimano.
Judges: Before ROBINSON, Chief Judge, WRIGHT, TAMM, WILKEY, WALD, MIKVA, EDWARDS, GINSBURG, BORK, SCALIA and STARR, Circuit Judges, and MacKINNON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Volume: 237
Pages: 333–333

Head Matter:
737 F.2d 1038
Robert A. WALTERS v. SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, et al., Appellants. Richard A. Gusimano.
No. 82-2089.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
March 15, 1984.
John D. Bates, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom Stanley S. Harris, U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C. (at the time the brief was filed), Royce C. Lamberth, R. Craig Lawrence and John Oliver Birch, Asst. U.S. Attys., Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellants.
Barton F. Stichman, Washington, D.C., with whom David F. Addlestone, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellees.
Joseph M. Hassett, John C. Keeney, Jr., Sue A. Kaplan, and Katherine A. Schoff, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for amicus curiae urging affirmance.
Before ROBINSON, Chief Judge, WRIGHT, TAMM, WILKEY, WALD, MIKVA, EDWARDS, GINSBURG, BORK, SCALIA and STARR, Circuit Judges, and MacKINNON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The suggestion for rehearing en banc of Appellees Walters, et. al., filed February 13, 1984, has been circulated to the full Court and no member has requested the taking of a vote thereon. On consideration of the foregoing, it is
ORDERED by the Court en banc that the suggestion is denied.