Case Name: John W. Rouse Construction Corporation, Plaintiff, v. John E. Rosecrans, Doing Business as Power and Process Company, Defendant; John E. Rosecrans, Doing Business as Power and Process Company, Appellant, v. Gouverneur Central School District No. 1, Defendant, and John W. Rouse Construction Corporation, Respondent; Harriet Lipscombe, Appellant, v. Lillie Rubin, Inc., et al., Respondents. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1962-02-09
Citations: 15 A.D.2d 832
Docket Number: 
Parties: (A) John W. Rouse Construction Corporation, Plaintiff, v. John E. Rosecrans, Doing Business as Power and Process Company, Defendant. John E. Rosecrans, Doing Business as Power and Process Company, Appellant, v. Gouverneur Central School District No. 1, Defendant, and John W. Rouse Construction Corporation, Respondent. (B) Harriet Lipscombe, Appellant, v. Lillie Rubin, Inc., et al., Respondents. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 15
Pages: 832–832

Head Matter:
(A) John W. Rouse Construction Corporation, Plaintiff, v. John E. Rosecrans, Doing Business as Power and Process Company, Defendant. John E. Rosecrans, Doing Business as Power and Process Company, Appellant, v. Gouverneur Central School District No. 1, Defendant, and John W. Rouse Construction Corporation, Respondent. (B) Harriet Lipscombe, Appellant, v. Lillie Rubin, Inc., et al., Respondents. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Opinion:
[In each action] Motions denied. Attention of appellants is called to. rule VII of the rules of this court.