Case Name: Thomas M. TULLY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Naomi LONG, Magistrate, Frederick County, VA; Martha Baker, Magistrate, Frederick County, VA; John J. McGrath, Jr., Judge, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-08-29
Citations: 238 F. App'x 957
Docket Number: No. 07-6659
Parties: Thomas M. TULLY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Naomi LONG, Magistrate, Frederick County, VA; Martha Baker, Magistrate, Frederick County, VA; John J. McGrath, Jr., Judge, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 238
Pages: 957–957

Head Matter:
Thomas M. TULLY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Naomi LONG, Magistrate, Frederick County, VA; Martha Baker, Magistrate, Frederick County, VA; John J. McGrath, Jr., Judge, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 07-6659.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 23, 2007.
Decided: Aug. 29, 2007.
Thomas M. Tully, pro se.
Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Thomas M. Tully appeals the district court's order denying his motion for mandamus construed in part as a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and dismissing the action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Tully's motion to amend his informal brief, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tully v. Long, No. 7:07-cv-00165-sgw, 2007 WL 1112696 (W.D.Va. signed as entered on Apr. 11 & filed on Apr. 12, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.