Case Name: Marjorie BAIRD and Milton Baird, individually and d/b/a Baird Funeral Home, a co-partnership, Appellants, v. Louise HUSTON and Marvin James Leininger, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1969-09-29
Citations: 227 So. 2d 337
Docket Number: No. 2383
Parties: Marjorie BAIRD and Milton Baird, individually and d/b/a Baird Funeral Home, a co-partnership, Appellants, v. Louise HUSTON and Marvin James Leininger, Appellees.
Judges: WALDEN, REED and OWEN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 227
Pages: 337–337

Head Matter:
Marjorie BAIRD and Milton Baird, individually and d/b/a Baird Funeral Home, a co-partnership, Appellants, v. Louise HUSTON and Marvin James Leininger, Appellees.
No. 2383.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.
Sept. 29, 1969.
Rehearing Denied Nor. 10, 1969.
John R. Beranek, of Jones, Adams, Paine & Foster, West Palm Beach, for appellants.
Will A. Nason, of Nason, Gildan & Yeager, West Palm Beach, and Irvin Frank, Jr., Fort Pierce, for appellee Huston.
Errol S. Willes of Willes, Bittan & Griffin, Fort Pierce, for appellee Leininger.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Our review of the record convinces us that the issue of implied consent was properly a jury issue and accordingly we affirm on the authority of Thomas v. Atlantic Associates, Inc., 226 So.2d 100, Supreme Court Case, opinion filed July 30, 1969, and Whalen v. Hill, Fla.App.1969, 219 So.2d 727. The other appellate points have been examined and found to be without merit.
Affirmed.
WALDEN, REED and OWEN, JJ., concur.