Case Name: Dwight FREDENBURG, Stephen Davison, Richard Allen, Dorris Derrick, Petitioners on Review, v. MENTAL HEALTH DIVISION, Respondent on Review
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1991-11-14
Citations: 312 Or. 242
Docket Number: CC 89C-11042, 89C-11086, 89C-11087, 89C-11088; CA A64530; SC S38273
Parties: Dwight FREDENBURG, Stephen Davison, Richard Allen, Dorris Derrick, Petitioners on Review, v. MENTAL HEALTH DIVISION, Respondent on Review.
Judges: 
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 312
Pages: 242–242

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted November 5,
review dismissed as improvidently allowed November 14, 1991
Dwight FREDENBURG, Stephen Davison, Richard Allen, Dorris Derrick, Petitioners on Review, v. MENTAL HEALTH DIVISION, Respondent on Review.
(CC 89C-11042, 89C-11086, 89C-11087, 89C-11088; CA A64530; SC S38273)
822 P2d 713
Robert C. Joondeph, Oregon Advocacy Center, Portland, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioners on review.
Richard D. Wasserman, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent on review. With him on the response were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Review dismissed as improvidently allowed.