Case Name: Richard C. PAULINE, Petitioner, v. Charles F. BORER and the Florida Real Estate Commission, Respondents
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1971-06-18
Citations: 253 So. 2d 719
Docket Number: No. 71-101
Parties: Richard C. PAULINE, Petitioner, v. Charles F. BORER and the Florida Real Estate Commission, Respondents.
Judges: PIERCE, C. J., and McNULTY, J., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 253
Pages: 719–720

Head Matter:
Richard C. PAULINE, Petitioner, v. Charles F. BORER and the Florida Real Estate Commission, Respondents.
No. 71-101.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
June 18, 1971.
Rehearing Denied Nov. 15, 1971.
Benjamin T. Shuman, of Waterhouse & Shuman, Orlando, for petitioner.
Frank A. Wilkinson, Gen. Counsel, Florida Real Estate Commission, Winter Park, for respondents.

Opinion:
MANN, Judge.
Pauline, as listing broker, was advised by a saleslady for another broker in a multiple listing system that their customer was willing to pay $32,000, or, if necessary, $33,000, for the property of Mr. and Mrs. Staples. Pauline's saleslady had procured an offer of $30,000 and talked with Staples on the telephone. Pauline picked up the phone and talked with Staples but did not advise him of the higher offer although he knew of it. Staples sent a telegraphed acceptance of the $30,000 offer. These findings are supported by competent substantial evidence and support the suspension of Pauline's license for one year. Pauline had a duty to disclose the higher offer. See Singer v. M. Grant Inc., Fla.App.1963, 151 So.2d 52; Anno., 7 A.L.R.3d 693.
Certiorari denied.
PIERCE, C. J., and McNULTY, J., concur.