Case Name: Albert Ping, Respondent, v. J. F. Hill, Appellant
Court: Washington Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Washington
Decision Date: 1912-09-12
Citations: 70 Wash. 699
Docket Number: No. 10368
Parties: Albert Ping, Respondent, v. J. F. Hill, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Washington Reports
Volume: 70
Pages: 699–699

Head Matter:
[No. 10368.
Department One.
September 12, 1912.]
Albert Ping, Respondent, v. J. F. Hill, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of tbe superior court for Spokane county, Hinkle, J., entered January 9, 1912, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of tbe plaintiff, in an action on contract.
Affirmed.
Allen & Allen, for appellant.
McCarthy & Edge and E. E. Cleland, for respondent.
Reported in 126 Pac. 411.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
In so far as the questions involved in this case merit discussion they are the same in substance as the questions presented in Waldrip v. Hill, ante p. 187, 126 Pac. 409. For tbe reasons there assigned, tbe judgment in tbis case is affirmed.