Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. David Paul CRUESOE, Appellant; David Paul CRUESOE, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1990-11-13
Citations: 800 S.W.2d 117
Docket Number: No. 57570
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. David Paul CRUESOE, Appellant. David Paul CRUESOE, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 800
Pages: 117–117

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. David Paul CRUESOE, Appellant. David Paul CRUESOE, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 57570.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Nov. 13, 1990.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Dec. 12, 1990.
Application to Transfer Denied Jan. 9, 1991.
Dave Hemingway, St. Louis, for appellant.
William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Robert P. Sass, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant appeals denial of his Rule 27.26 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have studied the trial transcript and legal file on direct appeal together with the motion hearing transcript and legal file. We find the factual statements and legal analysis of the issues in the state's brief to be supported by the records and the law. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.-16(b).