Case Name: WALTER DRAGAN ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. NATHAN GROSSMAN ET AL., RESPONDENTS
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1936-10-02
Citations: 117 N.J.L. 147
Docket Number: 
Parties: WALTER DRAGAN ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. NATHAN GROSSMAN ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 117
Pages: 147–147

Head Matter:
WALTER DRAGAN ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. NATHAN GROSSMAN ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Argued June 2, 1936
Decided October 2, 1936.
For the appellants, Abraham J. Isserman.
For the respondents, Hugh F. Doherty and Hicks, Kuhlthau & Thompson.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Lloyd in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.