Case Name: David Cordaro, an Infant, by His Guardian ad Litem, Edna Cordaro, et al., Respondents, v. Union Free School District Number 22, Farmingdale, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1961-10-23
Citations: 14 A.D.2d 804
Docket Number: 
Parties: David Cordaro, an Infant, by His Guardian ad Litem, Edna Cordaro, et al., Respondents, v. Union Free School District Number 22, Farmingdale, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 14
Pages: 804–805

Head Matter:
David Cordaro, an Infant, by His Guardian ad Litem, Edna Cordaro, et al., Respondents, v. Union Free School District Number 22, Farmingdale, Appellant.

Opinion:
Plaintiffs failed to make out a prima facie case. Under the circumstances, requirement of more specific supervision than that actually provided, would be unreasonable (cf. Miller v. Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1, 249 App. Div. 738). In our opinion, there was no competent proof adduced that the apparatus was unsuitable for children of plaintiff's age; nor may that fact be inferred solely from the size
of the apparatus. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Brennan, JJ., concur.