Case Name: Terri HAILEY, Grantor for the Estate of Jerry Scott Hailey and Terri Hailey, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Jerry Scott Hailey, Grantor for the Estate of Jerry Scott Hailey and Terri Hailey, Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; Recontrust Company, N.A.; ALG Trustee, LLC, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-11-22
Citations: 455 F. App'x 290
Docket Number: No. 11-1801
Parties: Terri HAILEY, Grantor for the Estate of Jerry Scott Hailey and Terri Hailey, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Jerry Scott Hailey, Grantor for the Estate of Jerry Scott Hailey and Terri Hailey, Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; Recontrust Company, N.A.; ALG Trustee, LLC, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before KING, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 455
Pages: 290–291

Head Matter:
Terri HAILEY, Grantor for the Estate of Jerry Scott Hailey and Terri Hailey, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Jerry Scott Hailey, Grantor for the Estate of Jerry Scott Hailey and Terri Hailey, Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; Recontrust Company, N.A.; ALG Trustee, LLC, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 11-1801.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 17, 2011.
Decided: Nov. 22, 2011.
Terri Hailey and Jerry Scott Hailey, Appellants Pro Se. Jontille Dionne Ray, Seth Abram Schaeffer, McGuirewoods, LLP, Richmond, Virginia; Jacob Scott Woody, McGuirewoods, LLP, Charlottes-ville, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before KING, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Terri Hailey and Jerry Scott Hailey appeal the district court's order dismissing the claim filed under the Truth and Lending Act and remanding the remaining claims to state court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the' reasons stated by the district court. Hailey v. Bank of Am., N.A., No. 3:11-cv-00269-HEH, 2011 WL 2618739 (E.D.Va. July 1, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.