Case Name: Carlos JACKSON, d/b/a Jackson Roofers, and Sentry Indemnity Company, Appellants, v. Adeline K. MOFFETT and John D. MacArthur, Appellees; John D. MacARTHUR, Appellant, v. Adeline K. MOFFETT, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1975-06-13
Citations: 314 So. 2d 226
Docket Number: Nos. 74-1519, 74-1553
Parties: Carlos JACKSON, d/b/a Jackson Roofers, and Sentry Indemnity Company, Appellants, v. Adeline K. MOFFETT and John D. MacArthur, Appellees. John D. MacARTHUR, Appellant, v. Adeline K. MOFFETT, Appellee.
Judges: WALDEN and MAGER, JJ., and GRID-LEY, WILLIAM C., Associate Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 314
Pages: 226–226

Head Matter:
Carlos JACKSON, d/b/a Jackson Roofers, and Sentry Indemnity Company, Appellants, v. Adeline K. MOFFETT and John D. MacArthur, Appellees. John D. MacARTHUR, Appellant, v. Adeline K. MOFFETT, Appellee.
Nos. 74-1519, 74-1553.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
June 13, 1975.
Rehearings Denied July 8, 1975.
Kirk Sullivan, of Adams, Sullivan & Coogler, and Jones, Paine & Foster, West Palm Beach, for appellants Carlos Jackson, d/b/a Jackson Roofers, and Sentry Indemnity Co.
John L. Bryan, Jr., and John T. Chris-tiansen of Sales & Christiansen, Palm Beach, for appellant John D. MacArthur.
Joel T. Daves, III, of Burdick & Daves, West Palm Beach, and Haines & Penrose, North Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
It is our view, in light of the difficult circumstances of this case, that there is adequate competent evidence to support the jury verdict and consequent judgment as to damages. We find no error therein or as to the appellant's point dealing with an alleged "Golden Rule" argument.
Affirmed.
WALDEN and MAGER, JJ., and GRID-LEY, WILLIAM C., Associate Judge, concur.