Case Name: Bernard DUNCAN, Reverend, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Commonwealth of VIRGINIA, Department of Corrections, Mecklenburg Correctional Center, Defendant-Appellee; Bernard Duncan, Reverend, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Corrections, Mecklenburg Correctional Center, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-05-19
Citations: 63 F. App'x 143
Docket Number: Nos. 02-2341, 02-2454
Parties: Bernard DUNCAN, Reverend, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Commonwealth of VIRGINIA, Department of Corrections, Mecklenburg Correctional Center, Defendant-Appellee. Bernard Duncan, Reverend, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Corrections, Mecklenburg Correctional Center, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 63
Pages: 143–143

Head Matter:
Bernard DUNCAN, Reverend, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Commonwealth of VIRGINIA, Department of Corrections, Mecklenburg Correctional Center, Defendant-Appellee. Bernard Duncan, Reverend, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Corrections, Mecklenburg Correctional Center, Defendant-Appellee.
Nos. 02-2341, 02-2454.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 18, 2003.
Decided May 19, 2003.
Bernard Duncan, Appellant Pro Se. Margaret Alice Browne, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appel-lee.
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
PER CURIAM.
Bernard Duncan appeals the district court's orders dismissing his discrimination action and denying his motion for judicial recusal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Duncan v. Virginia, No. CA-02-616-3 (E.D. Va. Oct. 4 & Dec. 12, 2002).
Duncan also seeks to appeal this Court's May 25, 2001, opinion affirming the district court's dismissal of his previous discrimination action. Duncan v. Commonwealth of Virginia, No. 00-2551, 9 Fed.Appx. 236, 2001 WL 565672 (4th Cir. May 25, 2001) (unpublished). We have previously denied both Duncan's rehearing petition as to this decision and his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his rehearing petition. No further "appeal" to this Court is available.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.