Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alejadro SANCHEZ-OVEIDA, also known as Fernando Ortiz Hernandez, also known as Guadalupe Munoz Hernandez, also known as Alejandro Ortiz Sanchez, also known as Alejandro Sanchez Oveida, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-09-04
Citations: 344 F. App'x 52
Docket Number: No. 08-20814
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alejadro SANCHEZ-OVEIDA, also known as Fernando Ortiz Hernandez, also known as Guadalupe Munoz Hernandez, also known as Alejandro Ortiz Sanchez, also known as Alejandro Sanchez Oveida, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 344
Pages: 52–53

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alejadro SANCHEZ-OVEIDA, also known as Fernando Ortiz Hernandez, also known as Guadalupe Munoz Hernandez, also known as Alejandro Ortiz Sanchez, also known as Alejandro Sanchez Oveida, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-20814
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Sept. 4, 2009.
James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Margaret Christina Ling, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Alejadro Sanchez-Oveida has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Sanchez-Oveida has filed a response and has moved for appointment of new counsel and to proceed pro se on appeal. Our independent review of the record, counsel's brief, and Sanchez-Oveida's response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Because Sanchez-Oveida did not raise claims of ineffective assistance of counsel below and the district court did not hear evidence regarding an ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim, the record is insufficient for this court to review Sanchez-Oveida's ineffective-assistance claim on direct appeal. See United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir.2006).
Counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, and counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein. Sanchez-Oveida's motions for appointment of new counsel and to proceed pro se on appeal are DENIED. The APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.