Case Name: Richard MONIZ; Felix Gonzales; Javier Camarillo; Steven Coe; Joseph L. Collins; Michael Duarte; Robert Dye; Eliseo Gonzalez; James Jones; Berancia Juarez; Charles Laswell; David Manley; Nelson Muniz; Peter Perea; Ramon Ramirez; Daniel Renteria; Edward Rose; Robert Sanchez; Guillermo O. Soto; Raul Trevino; Richard Vogel; Royce Walker, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, a public corporation; General Motors Hourly Rate Employees Pension Trust, a Trust, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-01-08
Citations: 23 F. App'x 855
Docket Number: No. 00-17053; D.C. No. CV-98-04913-MJJ
Parties: Richard MONIZ; Felix Gonzales; Javier Camarillo; Steven Coe; Joseph L. Collins; Michael Duarte; Robert Dye; Eliseo Gonzalez; James Jones; Berancia Juarez; Charles Laswell; David Manley; Nelson Muniz; Peter Perea; Ramon Ramirez; Daniel Renteria; Edward Rose; Robert Sanchez; Guillermo O. Soto; Raul Trevino; Richard Vogel; Royce Walker, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, a public corporation; General Motors Hourly Rate Employees Pension Trust, a Trust, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 23
Pages: 855–855

Head Matter:
Richard MONIZ; Felix Gonzales; Javier Camarillo; Steven Coe; Joseph L. Collins; Michael Duarte; Robert Dye; Eliseo Gonzalez; James Jones; Berancia Juarez; Charles Laswell; David Manley; Nelson Muniz; Peter Perea; Ramon Ramirez; Daniel Renteria; Edward Rose; Robert Sanchez; Guillermo O. Soto; Raul Trevino; Richard Vogel; Royce Walker, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, a public corporation; General Motors Hourly Rate Employees Pension Trust, a Trust, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 00-17053.
D.C. No. CV-98-04913-MJJ.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 6, 2001.
Decided Jan. 8, 2002.
Before BRUNETTI, KLEINFELD, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
We affirm for the reasons stated by the district judge.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.