Case Name: Bernice PISACK, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. B & C TOWING, INC., Defendant, and Marie J. Cavalchire and Alan Anthony Young, Defendants, and B & C Towing, Inc., Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff, v. The City of Newark, Third-Party Defendant. Eptisam Pellegrino, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. Nick's Towing Service, Inc., Defendant, and Nicholas Testa and Susan Testa, Defendants. Christopher Walker, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. All Points Automotive & Towing, Inc., Defendant, and Thomas Locicero, Defendant.
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 2018-11-02
Citations: 196 A.3d 981
Docket Number: M-260/261 September Term 2018; 081492
Parties: Bernice PISACK, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff,
v.
B & C TOWING, INC., Defendant,
and
Marie J. Cavalchire and Alan Anthony Young, Defendants,
and
B & C Towing, Inc., Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff,
v.
The City of Newark, Third-Party Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 196
Pages: 981–981

Head Matter:
Bernice PISACK, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff,
v.
B & C TOWING, INC., Defendant,
and
Marie J. Cavalchire and Alan Anthony Young, Defendants,
and
B & C Towing, Inc., Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff,
v.
The City of Newark, Third-Party Defendant.
Eptisam Pellegrino, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff,
v.
Nick's Towing Service, Inc., Defendant,
and
Nicholas Testa and Susan Testa, Defendants.
Christopher Walker, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff,
v.
All Points Automotive & Towing, Inc., Defendant,
and
Thomas Locicero, Defendant.
M-260/261 September Term 2018
081492
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
November 2, 2018
ORDER

Opinion:
It is ORDERED that the motions of the City of Newark for leave to file a motion for leave to appeal as within time (M-260) is granted; and it is further
ORDERED that the motion for leave to appeal (M-261) is denied, without prejudice to movant filing a motion for leave to appear as amicus curiae.