Case Name: Peter BALDWIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-06-06
Citations: 818 So. 2d 639
Docket Number: No. 1D01-3732
Parties: Peter BALDWIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ALLEN, C.J, MINER and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 818
Pages: 639–639

Head Matter:
Peter BALDWIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D01-3732.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
June 6, 2002.
Peter Baldwin, Pro Se, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant raised several claims in his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion. We affirm.
The only claim raised by Appellant that merits discussion is his claim for additional jail credit. Appellant failed to direct the court to portions of the record that would establish an entitlement to that credit. See Baker v. State, 714 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). We therefore affirm the denial of the jail credit claim without prejudice to Appellant filing a facially sufficient Rule 3.800(a) motion.
AFFIRMED.
ALLEN, C.J, MINER and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.