Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Rafael Cheuveret, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2003-05-06
Citations: 305 A.D.2d 137
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rafael Cheuveret, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 305
Pages: 137–137

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rafael Cheuveret, Appellant.
[757 NYS2d 842]

Opinion:
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward McLaughlin, J.), rendered November 29, 2001, convicting defendant, after a nonjury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third and fourth degrees, criminally using drug paraphernalia in the second degree (three counts) and resisting arrest, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of SVs to 10 years, unanimously affirmed. The matter is remitted to Supreme Court, New York County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).
The court properly precluded defendant from introducing a statement made by a codefendant as a purported declaration against penal interest. There were no supporting circumstances to attest to the statement's reliability (see People v Settles, 46 NY2d 154, 167-170 [1978]).
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The evidence warranted the inference of defendant's guilt under the theory of constructive possession (see People v Bundy, 90 NY2d 918 [1997]; People v Abreu, 261 AD2d 297 [1999], lv denied 93 NY2d 1013 [1999]) and under the drug factory presumption (see Penal Law § 220.25 [2]).
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Buckley, P.J., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Sullivan and Gonzalez, JJ.