Case Name: A. McCARRON v. COMMERCIAL CREDIT TRUST
Court: Minnesota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Minnesota
Decision Date: 1926-05-21
Citations: 167 Minn. 322
Docket Number: No. 25,195
Parties: A. McCARRON v. COMMERCIAL CREDIT TRUST.
Judges: 
Reporter: Minnesota Reports
Volume: 167
Pages: 322–323

Head Matter:
A. McCARRON v. COMMERCIAL CREDIT TRUST.
May 21, 1926.
No. 25,195.
David London, for appellant.
Alfred L. Timing, for respondent.
Reported in 209 N. W. 15.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Action for conversion of a Ford coupe. After a verdict for plaintiff, defendant appeals from the order denying Ms motion for judgment or a new trial. The evidence for plaintiff shows a conversion during a five-day extension of payment granted by defendant, the assignee of the seller. The forfeiture was declared for default in the very payment the time for wMch according to plaintiff had been extended. The verdict settles the facts in favor of plaintiff. Even though the extension of payment be without consideration, there can be no declaration of forfeiture during the additional period thereby allowed for payment. Scheerschmidt v. Smith, 74 Minn. 224, 77 N. W. 34; Reinkey v. Findley Elec. Co. 147 Minn. 161, 180 N. W. 236.
No other assignment of error calls for consideration.
Order affirmed.