Case Name: Joseph V. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-11-18
Citations: 119 S.W.3d 618
Docket Number: No. WD 62330
Parties: Joseph V. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before JAMES M. SMART, JR., P.J., ROBERT G. ULRICH, and LISA WHITE HARDWICK, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 119
Pages: 618–618

Head Matter:
Joseph V. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 62330.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Nov. 18, 2003.
Andrew Allen Sehroeder, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, joins on the briefs for Respondent.
Before JAMES M. SMART, JR., P.J., ROBERT G. ULRICH, and LISA WHITE HARDWICK, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Joseph V. Williams appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without a hearing. In his motion for post-conviction relief, Williams charged his attorney with ineffective assistance for failing to object when the prosecution mentioned his silence during an interview with a police detective. Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).