Case Name: Fred J. Sichel, Appellant, v. Louis Polak et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2006-09-19
Citations: 32 A.D.3d 734
Docket Number: 
Parties: Fred J. Sichel, Appellant, v Louis Polak et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 32
Pages: 734–735

Head Matter:
Fred J. Sichel, Appellant, v Louis Polak et al., Respondents.
[821 NYS2d 177]

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter B. Tolub, J.), entered February 8, 2006, which confirmed the report and recommendations of a Special Referee, dated March 11, 2003, and accepted the 1997 accounting submitted by defendants, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered January 25, 2006, which referred the issue of allocation and reimbursement for the parties' net contributions to the partnership, unanimously-dismissed as abandoned, without costs.
The report and recommendations of a special referee should be confirmed if its findings are supported by the record (Baker v Kohler, 28 AD3d 375 [2006]). The findings of the Special Referee herein were clearly supported by the record (see R.V.R. Realty v Tenants Alliance, 305 AD2d 289 [2003]). Defendants' expert accountant testified at the hearing that his accounting firm had reviewed not only tax returns but extensive supporting documentation, which material was then cross-checked for accuracy. Under these circumstances, plaintiff has not demonstrated that the second accounting was insufficiently documented so as to require disturbing the report of the Special Referee. Plaintiffs arguments are unavailing. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, Catterson, McGuire and Malone, JJ.