Case Name: GEORGE E. FRIOUX, Petitioner, v. FRED H. JOHNSON, as Auditor of San Joaquin County, Respondent
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1929-07-16
Citations: 100 Cal. App. 797
Docket Number: Civ. No. 3795
Parties: GEORGE E. FRIOUX, Petitioner, v. FRED H. JOHNSON, as Auditor of San Joaquin County, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports
Volume: 100
Pages: 797–797

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 3795.
Third Appellate District.
July 16, 1929.]
GEORGE E. FRIOUX, Petitioner, v. FRED H. JOHNSON, as Auditor of San Joaquin County, Respondent.
Nutter, Hancock & Rutherford and A. P. Hayne for Petitioner.
Guard C. Darrah, District Attorney, and Tom H. Louttit, Assistant District Attorney, for Respondent.

Opinion:
THE COURT.
Upon the authority of the case of In re Lovall, on Habeas Corpus, 207 Cal. 544 [279 Pac. 452], recently decided by the Supreme Court, distinguishing the questions involved in the above-entitled case from that of Robertson v. Langford, 95 Cal. App. 414 [273 Pac. 150], it is hereby ordered that the writ prayed for be and the same is hereby granted.