Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Aaron WILBON, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-04-27
Citations: 133 S.W.3d 522
Docket Number: No. ED 82475
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Aaron WILBON, Appellant.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J. and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR. and MARY R. RUSSELL, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 133
Pages: 522–523

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Aaron WILBON, Appellant.
No. ED 82475.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
April 27, 2004.
Kent Denzel, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Charlotte D. Douglass, Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J. and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR. and MARY R. RUSSELL, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Aaron Wilbon (Defendant) appeals from the judgment upon his convictions for first degree child molestation, Section 566.067, RSMo 2000, first-degree statutory rape, Section 566.032, RSMo 2000, and two counts of first-degree statutory sodomy, Section 566.062. Defendant was sentenced to concurrent terms of fifteen years' imprisonment for each count. On appeal, Defendant argues the trial court (1) abused its discretion when it sustained the State's objection and refused to admit Victim's mother's written statement to the police, (2) plainly erred when it admitted testimony from Victim's mother and the nurse practitioner concerning statements Victim made to them, and (3) abused its discretion when it overruled Defendant's objection and permitted the State to argue in closing argument that Victim "thought this man loved her and she thought that that's how men show love to a woman." We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).