Case Name: Samuel R. JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Eddie HART; Charlie Hargrove; Joyce Cozart; Gregory Gouldman; Ascee Anderson; Pamela Henderson; Dr. Joseph Lightsey, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-06-07
Citations: 651 F. App'x 214
Docket Number: No. 15-7946
Parties: Samuel R. JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Eddie HART; Charlie Hargrove; Joyce Cozart; Gregory Gouldman; Ascee Anderson; Pamela Henderson; Dr. Joseph Lightsey, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 651
Pages: 214–215

Head Matter:
Samuel R. JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Eddie HART; Charlie Hargrove; Joyce Cozart; Gregory Gouldman; Ascee Anderson; Pamela Henderson; Dr. Joseph Lightsey, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15-7946
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 24, 2016
Decided: June 7, 2016
Samuel R. Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Finarelli, Special Deputy Attorney General, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Ap-pellee.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Samuel R. Jackson appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and several related orders. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jackson v. Hart, No. 5:13-ct-03202-D (E.D.N.C. Nov. 9, 2015; Dec. 2, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED