Case Name: Ernest Hippner et al., Respondents, v. Salomon/North America, Inc., et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2002-02-11
Citations: 291 A.D.2d 433
Docket Number: 
Parties: Ernest Hippner et al., Respondents, v Salomon/North America, Inc., et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 291
Pages: 433–433

Head Matter:
Ernest Hippner et al., Respondents, v Salomon/North America, Inc., et al., Appellants.
[737 NYS2d 386]

Opinion:
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty, J.), dated June 25, 2001, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff Ernest Hippner fell and sustained injuries to his left leg skiing while using new equipment purchased from or manufactured by the defendants. The Supreme Court correctly denied the defendants' motion for summary judgment.
The defendants failed to make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557), since issues of fact exist concerning the validity of the release agreement signed by the plaintiff, the effectiveness of the ski boot bindings, their ability to release during a fall, and the plaintiffs awareness of the consequences of the bindings' new release setting. Smith, J.P., Krausman, Schmidt and Cozier, JJ., concur.