Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. $890,718.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY, Defendant, v. Clayton Willis, Claimant-Appellant, and Tammy Harrell, Claimant; United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Property, 475 Cottage DR, Mount Airy, Surry County, North Carolina, Defendant, v. Clayton Willis, Claimant-Appellant, and Carol Midkiff Mills, Claimant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-02-06
Citations: 216 F. App'x 359
Docket Number: Nos. 06-1747, 06-1748
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. $890,718.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY, Defendant, v. Clayton Willis, Claimant—Appellant, and Tammy Harrell, Claimant. United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Property, 475 Cottage DR, Mount Airy, Surry County, North Carolina, Defendant, v. Clayton Willis, Claimant—Appellant, and Carol Midkiff Mills, Claimant.
Judges: Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 216
Pages: 359–360

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. $890,718.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY, Defendant, v. Clayton Willis, Claimant—Appellant, and Tammy Harrell, Claimant. United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Property, 475 Cottage DR, Mount Airy, Surry County, North Carolina, Defendant, v. Clayton Willis, Claimant—Appellant, and Carol Midkiff Mills, Claimant.
Nos. 06-1747, 06-1748.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 8, 2007.
Decided: Feb. 6, 2007.
Clayton Willis, Appellant Pro Se. Gill Paul Beck, Lynne P. Klauer, Office of the United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Clayton Willis appeals the district court's orders forfeiting real property and currency to the Government. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Ac cordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Willis, Nos. 1:03-cv-00263-JAB; 1:02-cv00898-JAB (M.D.N.C. filed May 25, 2006 & entered May 26, 2006). We deny Willis' requests for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Although Willis asserts he has had no response to his request to proceed on appeal without payment of fees, we observe that the district court previously accorded Willis in forma pauperis status, and these appeals have proceeded on that basis.