Case Name: Joseph A. Broderick, as Superintendent of Banks of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v. Herman Alexander and Others, Defendants, and Leta M. Kahn, Respondent, and Howard S. Hoit and Others, Copartners, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Hoit, Rose & Troster, Impleaded Defendants, Appellants, and Nathaniel C. Schwartz, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Nathaniel C. Schwartz & Company, Impleaded Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1935-03
Citations: 243 A.D. 752
Docket Number: 
Parties: Joseph A. Broderick, as Superintendent of Banks of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v. Herman Alexander and Others, Defendants, and Leta M. Kahn, Respondent, and Howard S. Hoit and Others, Copartners, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Hoit, Rose & Troster, Impleaded Defendants, Appellants, and Nathaniel C. Schwartz, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Nathaniel C. Schwartz & Company, Impleaded Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 243
Pages: 752–752

Head Matter:
Joseph A. Broderick, as Superintendent of Banks of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v. Herman Alexander and Others, Defendants, and Leta M. Kahn, Respondent, and Howard S. Hoit and Others, Copartners, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Hoit, Rose & Troster, Impleaded Defendants, Appellants, and Nathaniel C. Schwartz, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Nathaniel C. Schwartz & Company, Impleaded Defendant.

Opinion:
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion.
Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O'Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.; O'Malley, J., dissents.