Case Name: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Louis GARZONE, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2010-10-14
Citations: 607 Pa. 325
Docket Number: No. 238 EAL 2010
Parties: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Louis GARZONE, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 607
Pages: 325–326

Head Matter:
6 A.3d 500
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Louis GARZONE, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Oct. 14, 2010.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 14th day of October 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as phrased by Petitioner, is:
Did the Superior Court err in removing the cost of employing county detectives and assistant district attorneys from the trial court's discretion to impose prosecution expenses on a convicted offender?
This matter is to be consolidated with Commonwealth v. Gerald Garzone, 607 Pa. 324, 6 A.3d 499 (2010).