Case Name: Javier VALDERRAMA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1985-01-15
Citations: 462 So. 2d 100
Docket Number: No. 84-948
Parties: Javier VALDERRAMA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUB-BART and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 462
Pages: 100–100

Head Matter:
Javier VALDERRAMA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 84-948.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan. 15, 1985.
Jeffery P. Raffle, Miami, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Jack B. Ludin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUB-BART and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The final judgments of conviction and sentences under review are affirmed upon a holding that the evidence error complained of was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt in light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt adduced at trial against the defendant Javier Yalderrama, including the defendant's own trial testimony. Brown v. United States, 411 U.S. 223, 93 S.Ct. 1565, 36 L.Ed.2d 208 (1973); Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250, 89 S.Ct. 1726, 23 L.Ed.2d 284 (1969).