Case Name: HILTON et ux, Respondents, v. SEILER, Appellant
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1972-05-24
Citations: 262 Or. 221
Docket Number: 
Parties: HILTON et ux, Respondents, v. SEILER, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 262
Pages: 221–221

Head Matter:
Argued May 8,
affirmed May 24, 1972
HILTON et ux, Respondents, v. SEILER, Appellant.
497 P2d 201
Manville M. Heisel, Medford, argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant.
Joel B. Reeder, Medford, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is a suit to quiet title to a parcel of land on the basis of adverse possession by plaintiffs and their predecessors in interest. Defendant appeals from a decree in favor of plaintiffs.
The only- issue in the case is whether plaintiffs established their claim by clear and convincing evidence. The trial court held that plaintiffs met this burden of proof. We have carefully read the transcript and concur in the trial court's conclusion.
Decree affirmed.