Case Name: ROBERT F. CATTO, AN INFANT BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, GREGG CATTO, AND GREGG CATTO, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. HOWARD A. SCHNEPP, MAURICE RIVER TOWNSHIP, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND CUMBERLAND COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, v. MAX BARBER, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT; ROBERT F. CATTO, AN INFANT BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, GREGG CATTO, AND GREGG CATTO, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. HOWARD A. SCHNEPP, DEFENDANT, AND MAURICE RIVER TOWNSHIP (A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY), CUMBERLAND COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS (THE GOVERNING BODY OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY), DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND MAURICE RIVER TOWNSHIP (A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY), THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF, v. HARLEYSVILLE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY AND AETNA CASUALTY AND INSURANCE COMPANY, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1972-12-18
Citations: 62 N.J. 20
Docket Number: 
Parties: ROBERT F. CATTO, AN INFANT BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, GREGG CATTO, AND GREGG CATTO, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. HOWARD A. SCHNEPP, MAURICE RIVER TOWNSHIP, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND CUMBERLAND COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, v. MAX BARBER, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT. ROBERT F. CATTO, AN INFANT BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, GREGG CATTO, AND GREGG CATTO, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. HOWARD A. SCHNEPP, DEFENDANT, AND MAURICE RIVER TOWNSHIP (A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY), CUMBERLAND COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS (THE GOVERNING BODY OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY), DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND MAURICE RIVER TOWNSHIP (A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY), THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF, v. HARLEYSVILLE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY AND AETNA CASUALTY AND INSURANCE COMPANY, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 62
Pages: 20–21

Head Matter:
ROBERT F. CATTO, AN INFANT BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, GREGG CATTO, AND GREGG CATTO, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. HOWARD A. SCHNEPP, MAURICE RIVER TOWNSHIP, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND CUMBERLAND COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, v. MAX BARBER, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT. ROBERT F. CATTO, AN INFANT BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, GREGG CATTO, AND GREGG CATTO, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. HOWARD A. SCHNEPP, DEFENDANT, AND MAURICE RIVER TOWNSHIP (A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY), CUMBERLAND COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS (THE GOVERNING BODY OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY), DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND MAURICE RIVER TOWNSHIP (A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY), THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF, v. HARLEYSVILLE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY AND AETNA CASUALTY AND INSURANCE COMPANY, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS.
Argued December 4, 1972
Decided December 18, 1972.
Mr. James L. Gooper argued the cause for appellants Catto (Messrs. Gooper, Greenberg, Eatzman & Todd, attorneys).
Mr. Gerald M. Eisenstat argued the cause for respondent Sehnepp (Messrs. Shapiro, Brotman, Eisenstat S Gapizola, attorneys).
Mr. Edward S. Miller argued the cause for respondent Township of Maurice River (Messrs. Gant & Miller, attorneys) .
Mr. Anthony D. Buonadonna argued the cause for respondent Cumberland County Board of Freeholders (Messrs. Tuso and Qrucdo, attorneys).

Opinion:
Pee Cukiam.
The judgment of the Appellate Division, 121 N. J. Super. 506, is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in its opinion.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintkaub, Justices Jacobs, Hall and Mountain, and Judges Coneokd and Lewis — 6.
For reversal — None.