Case Name: In the Matter of the Application of Hugo Seidenberg and Rose Seidenberg, Respondents, for a Mandamus Order against Charles F. Bales, Superintendent of Buildings, Borough of Queens, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1929-06
Citations: 227 A.D. 608
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Application of Hugo Seidenberg and Rose Seidenberg, Respondents, for a Mandamus Order against Charles F. Bales, Superintendent of Buildings, Borough of Queens, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 227
Pages: 608–608

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Application of Hugo Seidenberg and Rose Seidenberg, Respondents, for a Mandamus Order against Charles F. Bales, Superintendent of Buildings, Borough of Queens, Appellant.

Opinion:
Peremptory mandamus order reversed upon the law and the facts and an alternative mandamus order directed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements to abide the event, in order that the issue as to the use of the property in question for business purposes prior to October 3,1924, may be determined. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Kapper and Seeger, JJ., concur.