Case Name: Juan DOMINGUEZ and Gracela Dominguez, Appellants, v. BUCYRUS-ERIE COMPANY, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1987-02-11
Citations: 503 So. 2d 364
Docket Number: No. 86-1025
Parties: Juan DOMINGUEZ and Gracela Dominguez, Appellants, v. BUCYRUS-ERIE COMPANY, Appellee.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 503
Pages: 364–365

Head Matter:
Juan DOMINGUEZ and Gracela Dominguez, Appellants, v. BUCYRUS-ERIE COMPANY, Appellee.
No. 86-1025.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 11, 1987.
Lisa Bennett, Robert F. Weiner, Coral Gables, for appellants.
Pyszka, Kessler, Massey, Weldon, Catri, Holton & Douberley, Cooper, Wolfe & Bo-lotin and Maureen E. Lefebvre and Marc Cooper, Miami, for appellee.
Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on authority of Shaw v. General Motors Corp., 503 So.2d 362 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). We certify the same questions:
(1) Whether the legislative amendment of section 95.031(2), Florida Statutes (1983), abolishing the statute of repose in product liability actions, should be construed to operate retrospectively as to a cause of action which accrued before the effective date of the amendment. (2) If not, whether the decision of Pullum v. Cincinnati, Inc., 476 So.2d 657 (Fla.1985), appeal dismissed, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 1626, 90 L.Ed.2d 174 (1986), which overruled Battilla v. Allis Chalmers Mfg. Co., 392 So.2d 874 (Fla. 1980), applies so as to bar a cause of action that accrued after the Battilla decision but before the Pullum decision.