Case Name: Jason RAZIEN, Plaintiff-Appellant v. MICRO FOCUS (US), INCORPORATED; Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-02-23
Citations: 713 F. App'x 350
Docket Number: No. 17-50724 Summary Calendar
Parties: Jason RAZIEN, Plaintiff-Appellant v. MICRO FOCUS (US), INCORPORATED; Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, Defendants-Appellees
Judges: Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 713
Pages: 350–350

Head Matter:
Jason RAZIEN, Plaintiff-Appellant v. MICRO FOCUS (US), INCORPORATED; Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, Defendants-Appellees
No. 17-50724 Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed February 23, 2018
Kaushik Rambhotla, Esq., Rambhotla Law Firm, P.L.L.C., Austin, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant
Thomas Martin Fulkerson, Esq., Fulk-erson Lotz, L.L.P., Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellee Micro Focus (US), Incorporated
Darren Glenn Gibson, Salvador Davila, Littler Mendelson, P.C., Austin, TX, for Defendant-Appellee Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Jason Razien appeals the dismissal of his Title VII complaint. The court has carefully considered this appeal in light of the briefs, complaint, and pertinent portions of the record. Having done so, we find no error of law or reversible error of fact. The district court's judgment is AFFIRMED for essentially the same reasons articulated by that court.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.