Case Name: Louise D. P. Lee, Appellant, v. Mark C. Tredennick Company, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1925-12-30
Citations: 126 Misc. 613
Docket Number: 
Parties: Louise D. P. Lee, Appellant, v. Mark C. Tredennick Company, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 126
Pages: 613–616

Head Matter:
Louise D. P. Lee, Appellant, v. Mark C. Tredennick Company, Respondent.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
December 30, 1925.
Joseph Day Lee, for the appellant.
Eidlitz & Hulse [Harry H. French of counsel], for the respondent.

Opinion:
Peb Curiam.
Although the evidence does not satisfactorily establish that defendant's failure to construct the trimmer arch was the cause of the fire, defendant having concededly breached its contract it Was error to award judgment to defendant, carrying as it does the statutory costs.
Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and judgment directed for plaintiff for six cents.
Present, Bijur, Levy and Churchill, JJ.