Case Name: CALIFORNIA CREDIT & COLLECTION CORPORATION, Respondent, v. EMMA R. D. MOONEY, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1926-08-23
Citations: 199 Cal. 780
Docket Number: S. F. No. 11927
Parties: CALIFORNIA CREDIT & COLLECTION CORPORATION, Respondent, v. EMMA R. D. MOONEY, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Reports
Volume: 199
Pages: 780–780

Head Matter:
[S. F. No. 11927.
In Bank
August 23, 1926.]
CALIFORNIA CREDIT & COLLECTION CORPORATION, Respondent, v. EMMA R. D. MOONEY, Appellant.
Clarence N. Riggins for Appellant.
J. R. Cunnyngham and Daly B. Robnett for Respondent.

Opinion:
THE COURT.
Upon examination of the record in this case we are satisfied that the trial court was in error as to each of the two main questions presented upon this appeal. We are further satisfied that a practically parallel situation is presented upon this appeal as that presented and considered by the district court of appeal in and for the third appellate district in the cases of California Credit & Collection Corp. v. Randall (Cal. App.), 244 Pac. 958, California Credit & Collection Corp. v. Goodin (Cal. App.), 246 Pac. 121, and California Credit & Collection Corp. v. Carpenter (Cal. App.), 246 Pac. 126.
In the latter two of the above .cases a petition for hearing in this court was denied. Upon the authority of these cases the judgment herein is reversed.