Case Name: James KING, Appellant Pro Se, v. Jeremiah (Jay) NIXON and Missouri Department of Corrections, Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-04-01
Citations: 100 S.W.3d 891
Docket Number: No. WD 61780
Parties: James KING, Appellant Pro Se, v. Jeremiah (Jay) NIXON and Missouri Department of Corrections, Respondents.
Judges: Before JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Chief Judge, PATRICIA BRECKENRIDGE, and THOMAS H. NEWTON, Judges.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 100
Pages: 891–891

Head Matter:
James KING, Appellant Pro Se, v. Jeremiah (Jay) NIXON and Missouri Department of Corrections, Respondents.
No. WD 61780.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
April 1, 2003.
James King, Jefferson City, pro se.
Stephen D. Hawke, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondents.
Before JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Chief Judge, PATRICIA BRECKENRIDGE, and THOMAS H. NEWTON, Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant James King appeals from a judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Cole County granting the State's motion to dismiss his petition for declaratory judgment in which he claimed that section 558.011, setting forth terms of conditional release, is unconstitutionally vague. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion. However, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).