Case Name: Troy MOSES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Nurul CHOWDHURY, M.D.; P.A. Hamu, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-11-15
Citations: 50 F. App'x 162
Docket Number: No. 02-7306
Parties: Troy MOSES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Nurul CHOWDHURY, M.D.; P.A. Hamu, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 50
Pages: 162–162

Head Matter:
Troy MOSES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Nurul CHOWDHURY, M.D.; P.A. Hamu, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 02-7306.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 7, 2002.
Decided Nov. 15, 2002.
Troy Moses, Appellant Pro Se. Philip Melton Andrews, George Eugene Brown, Kramon & Graham, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Troy Moses appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Moses v. Chowdhury, No. CA-02-855-JFM (D.Md. Aug. 2, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.