Case Name: Alexis PEREZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-02-09
Citations: 750 So. 2d 161
Docket Number: No. 3D99-1256
Parties: Alexis PEREZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before JORGENSON, COPE, and LEVY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 750
Pages: 161–162

Head Matter:
Alexis PEREZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D99-1256.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 9, 2000.
Steven E. Amster, Coral Gables, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Steven R. Berger, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before JORGENSON, COPE, and LEVY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Williams v. State, 143 So.2d 484, 488 (Fla.1962) (trial judge may-ask neutral questions to clarify issues); Cooper v. State, 712 So.2d 1216, 1217 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (prosecutorial comments which are not inflammatory or egregious do not necessitate a new trial).