Case Name: In re CONAIR CORPORATION, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-09-23
Citations: 430 F. App'x 898
Docket Number: Misc. No. 987
Parties: In re CONAIR CORPORATION, Petitioner.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 430
Pages: 898–899

Head Matter:
In re CONAIR CORPORATION, Petitioner.
Misc. No. 987.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Sept. 23, 2011.
Before RADER, Chief Judge, LOURIE and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ON PETITION
PER CURIAM.
ORDER
Conair Corporation seeks a petition for a writ of mandamus directing the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to vacate its order denying Conair's motion to dismiss Bruce A. Rogers' 35 U.S.C. § 292 qui tarn relator suit. Conair also moves for an order to show cause why an order of contempt should not be issued.
On September 16, 2011, the President signed into law the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, H.R. 1249, 112th Cong. (1st Sess.2011), amending 35 U.S.C. § 292 and including the following text regarding the effective date of this provision: "The amendments made by this subsection shall apply to all eases, without exception, that are pending on, or commenced on or after, the date of the enactment of this Act." Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, § 16(b)(4).
In light of the enactment of the LeahySmith America Invents Act, we deem it the better course to deny Conair's petition in order for the district court to address the potential effect of the Act on this case in the first instance. To the extent necessary, Conair can petition for a writ of mandamus seeking the same relief after such issues are resolved.
Accordingly,
It Is Ordered That:
(1) The petition is denied.
(2) The motion for order to show cause is denied.
(3) The stay is lifted.