Case Name: STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesse R. BREWER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of New Mexico
Jurisdiction: New Mexico
Decision Date: 1967-05-08
Citations: 77 N.M. 763
Docket Number: No. 8184
Parties: STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesse R. BREWER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: CHAVEZ, C. J., and NOBLE, J., concur.
Reporter: New Mexico Reports
Volume: 77
Pages: 763–764

Head Matter:
427 P.2d 272
STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesse R. BREWER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 8184.
Supreme Court of New Mexico.
May 8, 1967.
Joseph A. Roberts, Santa Fe, for appellant.
Boston E. Witt, Atty. Gen., Gary O. O’Dowd, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for appellee.

Opinion:
OPINION
HENSLEY, Jr., Chief Judge, Court of Appeals.
In March, 1966, Jesse R. Brewer filed a motion permitted under § 21-1-1(93), N.M. S.A., 1953, to vacate the judgment and sentence previously imposed in the district court at Tucumcari. After a hearing the sentencing court entered an order denying the motion. This appeal followed.
The appellant seeks a reversal of the order of the lower court on the ground that the appellant had not been fully advised of the legal effect of his prior plea of guilty in the court of the committing magistrate. The question presented involves neither jurisdiction nor fundamental error. The objection was not included in the motion presented to the sentencing court and it is now sought to be raised for the first time. The many decisions touching this procedure need not be listed here. The following references will suffice: § 21-2-1(20) (1), N.M.S.A., 1953; Batchelor v. Charley, 74 N.M. 717, 398 P.2d 49. No ruling on the point having been invoked in the sentencing court, none will be made here.
The order appealed from will be affirmed.
It is so ordered.
CHAVEZ, C. J., and NOBLE, J., concur.