Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alfred Lee DAY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-02-28
Citations: 56 F. App'x 206
Docket Number: No. 03-6017
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alfred Lee DAY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 56
Pages: 206–206

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alfred Lee DAY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 03-6017.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 20, 2003.
Decided Feb. 28, 2003.
Alfred Lee Day, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Alfred Lee Day seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Day has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See United States v. Day, Nos. CR-98-15R; CA-01-662-7 (W.D.Va. Nov. 1, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-pealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.