Case Name: Martina VAN HOEF, Petitioner-Appellant, v. U.S. IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-09-28
Citations: 109 F. App'x 624
Docket Number: No. 04-6731
Parties: Martina VAN HOEF, Petitioner-Appellant, v. U.S. IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 109
Pages: 624–624

Head Matter:
Martina VAN HOEF, Petitioner-Appellant, v. U.S. IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 04-6731.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 16, 2004.
Decided: Sept. 28, 2004.
Martina Van Hoef, Appellant pro se.
Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Martina Van Hoef seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint which the district court construed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Van Hoef v. U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, No. CA-04-76 (E.D.Va. Mar. 23, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED