Case Name: Arbuckle et al. v. McCoy
Court: Supreme Court of Indiana
Jurisdiction: Indiana
Decision Date: 1876-05
Citations: 53 Ind. 63
Docket Number: 
Parties: Arbuckle et al. v. McCoy.
Judges: 
Reporter: Indiana Reports
Volume: 53
Pages: 63–64

Head Matter:
Arbuckle et al. v. McCoy.
From the Rush Circuit Court.
B. L. Smith, for appellants.
Sleeth & Study and Sexton & Cambern, for appellee.

Opinion:
Downey, C. J.
Where the court has improperly refused to grant a continuance, the ruling must be made a ground of a motion for a new trial, in order to present the question to this court, and then it must be done by assigning as error the overruling of the motion for a new trial. Carr v. Eaton, 42 Ind. 385, and cases cited; Buskirk's Pr. 224.
The judgment is affirmed, with five per cent, damages and costs.