Case Name: ORTHO-McNEIL PHARMACEUTICAL, INC. and Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, LLC, Plaintiffs-Cross Appellants, and Daiichi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Plaintiff-Cross Appellant, v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., Hi-Tech Pharmacal Co., Inc., Sicor Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sicor, Inc., and American Pharmaceutical Partners, Inc., Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-06-27
Citations: 188 F. App'x 979
Docket Number: Nos. 2006-1361, 2006-1392
Parties: ORTHO-McNEIL PHARMACEUTICAL, INC. and Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, LLC, Plaintiffs-Cross Appellants, and Daiichi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Plaintiff-Cross Appellant, v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., Hi-Tech Pharmacal Co., Inc., Sicor Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sicor, Inc., and American Pharmaceutical Partners, Inc., Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 188
Pages: 979–979

Head Matter:
ORTHO-McNEIL PHARMACEUTICAL, INC. and Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, LLC, Plaintiffs-Cross Appellants, and Daiichi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Plaintiff-Cross Appellant, v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., Hi-Tech Pharmacal Co., Inc., Sicor Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sicor, Inc., and American Pharmaceutical Partners, Inc., Defendants-Appellants.
Nos. 2006-1361, 2006-1392.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
June 27, 2006.

Opinion:
ON MOTION
ORDER
The parties move jointly to dismiss their appeals of the March 17, 2006 order of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, Inc., No. 02-CV-2794, 2006 WL 755995 et al.
Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) The joint motion to dismiss the appeals is granted.
(2) All sides shall bear their own costs.
We note that the parties request that this dismissal be with prejudice; however, it is not the practice of this court to dismiss with or without prejudice. Furthermore, the parties ask that the court dismiss and remand. However, the court cannot both dismiss and remand.