Case Name: Doris J. THAMES, a/k/a Doris Thames, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. OKLAHOMA HISTORICAL SOCIETY, an Oklahoma Corporation; Fred A. Olds, Appellees-Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1987-01-29
Citations: 809 F.2d 699
Docket Number: No. 85-2537
Parties: Doris J. THAMES, a/k/a Doris Thames, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. OKLAHOMA HISTORICAL SOCIETY, an Oklahoma Corporation; Fred A. Olds, Appellees-Defendants.
Judges: Before LOGAN and SEYMOUR, Circuit Judges, and BROWN, District Senior Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 809
Pages: 699–700

Head Matter:
Doris J. THAMES, a/k/a Doris Thames, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. OKLAHOMA HISTORICAL SOCIETY, an Oklahoma Corporation; Fred A. Olds, Appellees-Defendants.
No. 85-2537.
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
Jan. 29, 1987.
Steven M. Angel of Hughes and Nelson, Oklahoma City, Okl., for appellant-plaintiff.
Thomas R. Williams, Guthrie, Okl. and Michael W. Elliott, Asst. Atty. Gen., State of Okl. (Michael C. Turpén, Atty. Gen., State of Okl., with them on the brief), for appellees-defendants.
Before LOGAN and SEYMOUR, Circuit Judges, and BROWN, District Senior Judge.
sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have reviewed the records and briefs and considered the arguments advanced by counsel.
We have also examined the Order and Judgment in accordance therewith by the District Court dated September 9, 1985, Dkt. No. 15 in Civil Action 85-1138-E for the Western District of Oklahoma. (646 F.Supp. 13). We have concluded the dismissal was warranted.
We affirm the Judgment of the District Court for the reasons contained in its written Order.