Case Name: DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellant, v. Karen I. SAULTER and Robert W. Saulter, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-02-04
Citations: 751 So. 2d 163
Docket Number: No. 1D99-4080
Parties: DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellant, v. Karen I. SAULTER and Robert W. Saulter, Appellees.
Judges: KAHN, BENTON, AND VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 751
Pages: 163–163

Head Matter:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellant, v. Karen I. SAULTER and Robert W. Saulter, Appellees.
No. 1D99-4080.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Feb. 4, 2000.
Mark J. Henderson, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Ben R. Patterson, Tallahassee, for Ap-pellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Having considered appellant's response to the court's show cause order, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Mathis v. Florida Department of Corrections, 726 So.2d 389 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)(stating that an order that determines entitlement to back-pay, but leaves open the amount due is interlocutory in nature). The dismissal is without prejudice to file a notice of appeal when a final order is rendered.
KAHN, BENTON, AND VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.