Case Name: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent, v. Leon MILLS, Petitioner
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2016-07-19
Citations: 636 Pa. 229
Docket Number: No. 124 EAL 2016
Parties: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent, v. Leon MILLS, Petitioner.
Judges: 
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 636
Pages: 229–229

Head Matter:
141 A.3d 1275
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent, v. Leon MILLS, Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
July 19, 2016.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 19th day of July, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
Did not the trial court properly grant [P]etitioner's motion to dismiss pursuant to Pa.R.Crim.P. 600, where the time form a scheduling conference to a status listing consisted of time attributable to the conventional progression of a criminal case and was not judicial "delay," and was therefore correctly included in the calculation of the 365 days in which to bring [Petitioner to trial, and thus where more than 365 days elapsed before [Petitioner was brought to trial?