Case Name: Robert Lee Harper, EN3, U. S. Coast Guard v. CDR D. B. Thurnher, USCG, Commanding Officer (Acting), USCGC EDISTO (WAGB 284), Convening Authority and ADM Chester R. Bender, USCG, Commandant
Court: United States Court of Military Appeals
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1973-06-25
Citations: 22 C.M.A. 657
Docket Number: No. 73-32
Parties: Robert Lee Harper, EN3, U. S. Coast Guard v. CDR D. B. Thurnher, USCG, Commanding Officer (Acting), USCGC EDISTO (WAGB 284), Convening Authority and ADM Chester R. Bender, USCG, Commandant.
Judges: Chief Judge Darden would dismiss the petition for the relief sought is not in aid of this Court’s jurisdiction.
Reporter: Decisions of the United States Court of Military Appeals
Volume: 22
Pages: 657–657

Head Matter:
June 25, 1973
No. 73-32
Robert Lee Harper, EN3, U. S. Coast Guard v. CDR D. B. Thurnher, USCG, Commanding Officer (Acting), USCGC EDISTO (WAGB 284), Convening Authority and ADM Chester R. Bender, USCG, Commandant.

Opinion:
On consideration of the "Petition for Extraordinary Relief in the Nature of a Writ of Mandamus," filed in the above-entitled action, it is, by the Court, this 25th day of June 1973,
ORDERED:
That said petition be, and the same hereby is, dismissed. Bumpus v. Thurnher, Miscellaneous Docket No. 73-31, June 25, 1973.
Chief Judge Darden would dismiss the petition for the relief sought is not in aid of this Court's jurisdiction.
Judge Duncan would order the respondents to show cause why the relief sought should not be granted.