Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Marco Vinicio RODRIGUEZ-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-05-24
Citations: 689 F. App'x 808
Docket Number: No. 16-41361 Summary Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Marco Vinicio RODRIGUEZ-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 689
Pages: 808–809

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Marco Vinicio RODRIGUEZ-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant
No. 16-41361 Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed May 24, 2017
Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Marco Vinicio Rodriguez-Garcia, Pro Se
Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Marco Vinicio Rodriguez-Gar cia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (6th Cir. 2011). Rodriguez-Garcia has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivo-lous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 6th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.