Case Name: Roger Dale FREEMAN, Defendant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1993-05-18
Citations: 852 S.W.2d 431
Docket Number: No. 62507
Parties: Roger Dale FREEMAN, Defendant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent.
Judges: Before AHRENS, P.J., and CRIST and REINHARD, J.J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 852
Pages: 431–432

Head Matter:
Roger Dale FREEMAN, Defendant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent.
No. 62507.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
May 18, 1993.
Raymond Legg, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for defendant, appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Millie Aulbur, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff, respondent.
Before AHRENS, P.J., and CRIST and REINHARD, J.J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant appeals the dismissal, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears; an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).