Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James Mixon, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2011-09-22
Citations: 87 A.D.3d 919
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Mixon, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 87
Pages: 919–920

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Mixon, Appellant.
[929 NYS2d 737]

Opinion:
The resentencing proceeding imposing a term of postrelease supervision was neither barred by double jeopardy nor otherwise unlawful (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]). We have no authority to revisit defendant's prison sentence on this appeal (see id. at 635). Concur — Saxe, J.E, Friedman, Acosta, DeGrasse and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.