Case Name: Thomas ROSA, Jr., Petitioner, Appellant, v. Michael T. MALONEY, Respondent, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-09-07
Citations: 197 F. App'x 10
Docket Number: No. 05-2796
Parties: Thomas ROSA, Jr., Petitioner, Appellant, v. Michael T. MALONEY, Respondent, Appellee.
Judges: Before BOUDIN, Chief Judge, TORRUELLA and DYK, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 197
Pages: 10–11

Head Matter:
Thomas ROSA, Jr., Petitioner, Appellant, v. Michael T. MALONEY, Respondent, Appellee.
No. 05-2796.
United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
Sept. 7, 2006.
Kathleen M. McCarthy, was on brief, for appellant.
Susanne G. Reardon, Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Bureau, with whom Thomas F. Reilly, Attorney General, were on brief, for appellee.
Before BOUDIN, Chief Judge, TORRUELLA and DYK, Circuit Judges.
Of the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner Thomas Rosa, Jr. ("Rosa") appeals the district court's denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Rosa claims that his Massachusetts state court conviction for murder in the first degree and kidnaping, Commonwealth v. Rosa, 422 Mass. 18, 661 N.E.2d 56 (1996), should be set aside on two grounds. First, Rosa alleges that post-conviction DNA testing casts doubt on his original conviction. Second, the prosecution lost two pieces of evidence before DNA-testing could be performed. The district court found that neither ground was a viable challenge to Rosa's conviction. After carefully reviewing the parties' arguments, we affirm substantially for the reasons set out by the district court in its thorough and well-reasoned memorandum and order. We find no arguments requiring further discussion on appeal.
Affirmed.