Case Name: TOWNSHIP OF BURLINGTON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. EDYTHE MESSER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1987-05-13
Citations: 9 N.J. Tax 634
Docket Number: 
Parties: TOWNSHIP OF BURLINGTON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. EDYTHE MESSER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Tax Court Reports
Volume: 9
Pages: 634–634

Head Matter:
TOWNSHIP OF BURLINGTON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. EDYTHE MESSER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued April 28, 1987
Decided May 13, 1987.
Before Judges GAULKIN, BAIME and ASHBEY.
Amy Reisen argued the cause for appellant (Freundlich & Reisen, attorneys; Amy Reisen and Lawrence J. Freundlich, on the brief).
John E. Harrington argued the cause for respondent (Scklesinger, Schlosser, Foy & Harrington, attorneys; John E. Harrington, on the letter-brief).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The determination of the Tax Court is affirmed essentially for the reasons expressed by Judge Lario in his reported opinion.