Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Keith Waters, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2011-02-01
Citations: 81 A.D.3d 673
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Keith Waters, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 81
Pages: 673–674

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Keith Waters, Appellant.
[916 NYS2d 791]

Opinion:
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Sullivan, J.), rendered May 16, 2006, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the Supreme Court erred in denying his Batson challenges (see Batson v Kentucky, 476 US 79 [1986]) with respect to the prosecutor's use of peremptory challenges to exclude African-American women from the jury. The prosecutor provided race- and gender-neutral explanations for excluding each of the prospective jurors at issue (id. at 97; see People v Smocum, 99 NY2d 418, 420 [2003]). The Supreme Court's determination that these explanations were nonpretextual is entitled to deference on appeal and should not be disturbed where, as here, it is supported by the record (see People v Hernandez, 75 NY2d 350, 356-357 [1990], affd 500 US 352 [1991]; People v Fuller, 302 AD2d 405 [2003]). Prudenti, P.J., Angiolillo, Florio and Sgroi, JJ., concur.