Case Name: In the Matter of A. B. L. W., a Child. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Respondent, v. V. W., Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2011-08-17
Citations: 245 Or. App. 161
Docket Number: 08141J; Petition Number 08141J02; A147763
Parties: In the Matter of A. B. L. W., a Child. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Respondent, v. V. W., Appellant.
Judges: Before Schuman, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Sercombe, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 245
Pages: 161–162

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted July 11,
affirmed August 17, 2011
In the Matter of A. B. L. W., a Child. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Respondent, v. V. W., Appellant.
Lane County Circuit Court
08141J
Petition Number 08141J02
A147763
261 P3d 93
Megan Jacquot argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.
Cecil Reniche-Smith, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were John R. Kroger, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.
Before Schuman, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Sercombe, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Mother appeals from a judgment terminating her parental rights in her child, A. The judgment specifies several findings on which the decision is based, including a finding that "mother abandoned" the child. The parties agree that the state did not prove abandonment. We agree as well. However, we also conclude that the state proved the other allegations by clear and convincing evidence. We therefore affirm the judgment, but note that our decision is not based on any allegation of abandonment. See Dept. of Human Services v. B. J. B., 242 Or App 534, 256 P3d 167 (2011) (holding that if the disposition of a termination of parental rights case is "based on some but not all of the allegations in a petition , we will, if appropriate, specify any allegations that play no part in our disposition").
Affirmed.