Case Name: PRUNE BARGAINING ASSOCIATION, a non-profit Cooperative Association, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Robert BERGLAND (successor to Earl Butz), Secretary of Agriculture of the United States et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1978-03-20
Citations: 571 F.2d 1132
Docket Number: No. 75-3046
Parties: PRUNE BARGAINING ASSOCIATION, a non-profit Cooperative Association, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Robert BERGLAND (successor to Earl Butz), Secretary of Agriculture of the United States et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before DUNIWAY, WRIGHT and SNEED, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 571
Pages: 1132–1132

Head Matter:
PRUNE BARGAINING ASSOCIATION, a non-profit Cooperative Association, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Robert BERGLAND (successor to Earl Butz), Secretary of Agriculture of the United States et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 75-3046.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
March 20, 1978.
Reginald Steer, of Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, San Francisco, Cal., Bruce I. Cornblum (argued), San Diego, Cal, for plaintiffs-appellants.
Alexis Panagakos (argued), of Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., for defendantsappellees.
Before DUNIWAY, WRIGHT and SNEED, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The judgment appealed from is affirmed for the reasons stated by Judge Orrick in his Memorandum Opinion, Prune Bargaining Association v. Butz, N.D.Cal., 1975, 444 F.Supp. 785. We add only that the judge did, on motion for new trial, consider appellants' "Corrected Exhibit C." As to that exhibit, he said:
[S]o far as the newly discovered evidence goes, I think it's inconsequential, at best, the changes in the figures — and irrelevant at the least.
(R.T. 198.)
He was right.
Affirmed.