Case Name: Faour Abdallah FRAIHAT, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-12-28
Citations: 261 F. App'x 964
Docket Number: Nos. 05-74538, 05-77038, 06-73678
Parties: Faour Abdallah FRAIHAT, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before GOODWIN, WALLACE, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 261
Pages: 964–965

Head Matter:
Faour Abdallah FRAIHAT, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
Nos. 05-74538, 05-77038, 06-73678.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 20, 2007.
Filed Dec. 28, 2007.
Abdallah Faour Fraihat, San Diego, CA, pro se.
District Director, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Diego, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Michele Y.F. Sarko, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before GOODWIN, WALLACE, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Faour Abdallah Fraihat, a native and citizen of Jordan, petitions pro se for review of three orders of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA"). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Fernandez-Ruiz v. Gonzales, 468 F.3d 1159, 1163 (9th Cir.2006). We deny the petitions for review in Nos. 05-74538 and No. 05-77038, and grant the government's request for remand in petition No. 06-73678.
The BIA's July 11, 2005 order properly concluded that the immigration judge's ("IJ") March 22, 2005 decision became administratively final because Fraihat waived appeal. The IJ's questioning of Fraihat was adequate for a valid appeal waiver. Cf. Biwot v. Gonzales, 403 F.3d 1094, 1098 (9th Cir.2005) (holding that an appeal waiver must be considered and intelligent). In light of our determination, we conclude that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Fraihat's motion to reopen and reconsider. Accordingly, we deny the petitions for review in Nos. 05-74538 and 05-77038.
We grant the government's request that petition No. 06-73678 be remanded to the BIA for reconsideration of its July 10, 2006 order pursuant to Matter of Liadov, 23 I. & N. Dec. 990 (BIA 2006).
We grant the government's motion to strike documents submitted by Fraihat that are not in the administrative record. Fraihat's pending motion is denied. Nos. 05-74538, 05-77038: PETITIONS FOR REVIEW DENIED. No. 06-73678: REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.