Case Name: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Paxton
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1993-04-28
Citations: 66 Ohio St. 3d 163
Docket Number: No. 92-2527
Parties: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Paxton.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 66
Pages: 163–164

Head Matter:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Paxton.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Paxton (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 163.]
(No. 92-2527
Submitted February 2, 1993
Decided April 28, 1993.)
J. Warren Bettis, Disciplinary Counsel, and Dianna L. Chesley, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.
Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, David J. Young and John R. Gall; and Mark H. Aultman, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
After reading the testimonial letters submitted by respondent, we agree with the findings and recommendation of the board. We hereby publicly reprimand respondent and tax costs to him.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.