Case Name: Corey Lamonde JAMES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Fred NASTRI, HO; Joseph F. Neder, Ex-Warden NBCI; David Wilhelm, Sgt.; Warden Bobby Shearin; John Rowley, Ex-Warden; Brian Moore, Ex-CO II NBCI; Dave Cowen, Ex-Sgt. NBCI; J.E. Combs, Ex-CO II NBCI; Maxine Bryant; Al Davis, HO, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-12-20
Citations: 458 F. App'x 292
Docket Number: No. 11-7058
Parties: Corey Lamonde JAMES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Fred NASTRI, HO; Joseph F. Neder, Ex-Warden NBCI; David Wilhelm, Sgt.; Warden Bobby Shearin; John Rowley, Ex-Warden; Brian Moore, Ex-CO II NBCI; Dave Cowen, Ex-Sgt. NBCI; J.E. Combs, Ex-CO II NBCI; Maxine Bryant; Al Davis, HO, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 458
Pages: 292–292

Head Matter:
Corey Lamonde JAMES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Fred NASTRI, HO; Joseph F. Neder, Ex-Warden NBCI; David Wilhelm, Sgt.; Warden Bobby Shearin; John Rowley, Ex-Warden; Brian Moore, Ex-CO II NBCI; Dave Cowen, Ex-Sgt. NBCI; J.E. Combs, Ex-CO II NBCI; Maxine Bryant; Al Davis, HO, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 11-7058.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 15, 2011.
Decided: Dec. 20, 2011.
Corey Lamonde James, Appellant Pro Se. Glen William Bell, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Corey Lamonde James appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. James v. Nastri, No. 8:10-cv-02272-AW, 2011 WL 2853914 (D.Md. filed July 13, 2011 & entered July 14, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.