Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Dale DOERING, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1991-01-15
Citations: 805 S.W.2d 229
Docket Number: Nos. 55344, 57744
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Dale DOERING, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 805
Pages: 229–230

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Dale DOERING, Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 55344, 57744.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Jan. 15, 1991.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Feb. 20, 1991.
Application to Transfer Denied April 9, 1991.
Henry B. Robertson, Beverly A. Beim-diek, St. Louis, for defendant-appellant.
William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., John P. Pollard, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff-respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant, Dale Doering, was convicted by a jury of robbery, second degree, § 569.030 RSMo 1986 and sentenced to fifteen years imprisonment. Defendant appeals from his conviction and sentence and also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion.
The evidence supporting the jury verdict is not insufficient, and the judgment of the trial court on the Rule 29.15 motion is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous.
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgments are affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25 and 84.16(b).