Case Name: Kevin C. KLIK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VERIZON VIRGINIA, INC., a/k/a Verizon Va; Verizon Services Corp., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-10-12
Citations: 669 F. App'x 162
Docket Number: No. 16-1395
Parties: Kevin C. KLIK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VERIZON VIRGINIA, INC., a/k/a Verizon Va; Verizon Services Corp., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 669
Pages: 162–163

Head Matter:
Kevin C. KLIK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VERIZON VIRGINIA, INC., a/k/a Verizon Va; Verizon Services Corp., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-1395
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: September 29, 2016
Decided: October 12, 2016
Melvin E. Williams, Mel Williams PLC, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. Betty S.W. Graumlich, Reed Smith LLP, Richmond, Virginia; Kim M. Watterson, Reed Smith LLP, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kevin C. Klik appeals the district court's order granting Defendants' summary judgment motion and denying Klik's summary judgment motion on Klik's disability discrimination claims, brought pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 to 12213 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the -district court's order. See Klik v. Verizon Va., Inc., No. 6:15-cv-00002-NKM-JCH, 2016 WL 917499 (W.D. Va. Mar. 8, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED