Case Name: Patricia A. PRESCOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION; Professional Foreclosure Corporation of Virginia; Shapiro, Brown & Alt, LLP, f/k/a Shapiro & Burson; Logs Corporation; Gerald Shapiro, Principal; John Burson, Principal; Gerald Alt, Principal; Kristine Brown, Principal; Sprouses Corner, L.L.C.; J. Cabell Metts, III; R. Alan Anderson, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-05-25
Citations: 689 F. App'x 769
Docket Number: No. 17-1235
Parties: Patricia A. PRESCOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION; Professional Foreclosure Corporation of Virginia; Shapiro, Brown & Alt, LLP, f/k/a Shapiro & Burson; Logs Corporation; Gerald Shapiro, Principal; John Burson, Principal; Gerald Alt, Principal; Kristine Brown, Principal; Sprouses Corner, L.L.C.; J. Cabell Metts, III; R. Alan Anderson, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 689
Pages: 769–769

Head Matter:
Patricia A. PRESCOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION; Professional Foreclosure Corporation of Virginia; Shapiro, Brown & Alt, LLP, f/k/a Shapiro & Burson; Logs Corporation; Gerald Shapiro, Principal; John Burson, Principal; Gerald Alt, Principal; Kristine Brown, Principal; Sprouses Corner, L.L.C.; J. Cabell Metts, III; R. Alan Anderson, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 17-1235
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 23, 2017
Decided: May 25, 2017
Patricia A. Prescott, Appellant Pro Se. J.P. McGuire Boyd, Jr., WILLIAMS MULLEN, Richmond, Virginia; John MacDonald Robb, III, LECLAIR RYAN, PC, Richmond, Virginia; Lisa Hudson Kim, SAMUEL I. WHITE, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Patricia A Prescott appeals the district court's order dismissing her complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Prescott v. PHH Mortgage Corp., No. 3:16-cv-00288-REP, 2017 WL 510449 (E.D. Va., Feb. 2, 2017). In light of our decision to affirm the judgment of the district court, we deny Appellee PHH Mortgage Corporation's motion to dismiss. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED