Case Name: STEWART v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1913-12-23
Citations: 162 S.W. 517
Docket Number: 
Parties: STEWART v. STATE.
Judges: DAVIDSON, X, absent.
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 162
Pages: 517–517

Head Matter:
STEWART v. STATE.
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Dec. 23, 1913.)
Criminal Law (§ 1099*) — Appeal—Statement of Facts — Approval.
A statement of facts not approved by the trial judge cannot be considered for any purpose.
[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2866-2880; Dec. Dig. § 1099.*]
Appeal from District Court, Angelina County; L. D. Guinn, Judge.
Willie Stewart was convicted of seduction, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Opinion:
PRENDERGAST, P. J.
Appellant appeals from a conviction for seduction with his penalty fixed at five years in the penitentiary. There is with the record what was perhaps intended for a statement of facts, but it is not approved by the trial judge. It has no approval whatever upon it. Of course, this court cannot consider it for any purpose. There are no questions raised which can be considered in the absence of a statement of facts.
The judgment is affirmed.
DAVIDSON, X, absent.