Case Name: Kevin BOGUE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NCO FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-04-17
Citations: 687 F. App'x 536
Docket Number: No. 15-35078
Parties: Kevin BOGUE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NCO FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before: W, FLETCHER and GOULD, Circuit Judges, and BLOCK, District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 687
Pages: 536–536

Head Matter:
Kevin BOGUE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NCO FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 15-35078
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 7, 2017 Seattle, Washington
Filed April 17, 2017
Jason Anderson, Anderson Law of King County, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellant .
Damian P. Richard, Sessions Fishman Nathan & Israel, LLP, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellee
Before: W, FLETCHER and GOULD, Circuit Judges, and BLOCK, District Judge.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed, R. App. P. 34(a)(2),
The Honorable Frederic Block, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Kevin Bogue. appeals from a district court order awarding him $1,001 in attorney's fees. Because the district judge did not begin his fees analysis by first calculating the lodestar, Bogue asks that we vacate the award and remand for a recalculation of fees. See Camacho v. Bridgeport Fin., Inc., 523 F.3d 973, 982 (9th Cir. 2008). Under the circumstances, a remand for recalculation is so likely to result in the same award that we decline to do as Bogue requests.
AFFIRMED
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.