Case Name: Jesse SEMBLY; Tyese Graham, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ND, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-12-12
Citations: 508 F. App'x 443
Docket Number: No. 12-1134
Parties: Jesse SEMBLY; Tyese Graham, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ND, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before: MOORE and COOK, Circuit Judges; BERTELSMAN, District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 508
Pages: 443–444

Head Matter:
Jesse SEMBLY; Tyese Graham, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ND, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 12-1134.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Dec. 12, 2012.
Before: MOORE and COOK, Circuit Judges; BERTELSMAN, District Judge.
The Honorable William O. Bertelsman, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiffs-Appellants Jesse Sembly and Tyese Graham ("Plaintiffs") appeal the dismissal of their action arising from the foreclosure on their home. In their brief, Plaintiffs make no effort to address the Rule 9(b), 12(b)(6), and other deficiencies identified by the district court as grounds for dismissal. Nor do they set forth a rationale supporting their view that the district court erred. Instead, they argue for standing to challenge the foreclosure sale, even though the district court decided the standing issue in their favor. They also perfunctorily raise issues related to promissory estoppel, preemption, and Michigan's statute of frauds. Because Plaintiffs have not adequately addressed in their brief on appeal the district court's reasons for dismissing their complaint, we AFFIRM.