Case Name: Leo DiTomasso, Appellant and Respondent, v. Vito Loverro et al., Respondents, and Samuel Rubel et al., Respondents and Appellants
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1937-11-23
Citations: 276 N.Y. 551
Docket Number: 
Parties: Leo DiTomasso, Appellant and Respondent, v. Vito Loverro et al., Respondents, and Samuel Rubel et al., Respondents and Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 276
Pages: 551–553

Head Matter:
Leo DiTomasso, Appellant and Respondent, v. Vito Loverro et al., Respondents, and Samuel Rubel et al., Respondents and Appellants.
Argued October 21, 1937;
decided November 23, 1937.
Jacob Krisel, Herman Mendes and George Lessall for plaintiff, appellant and respondent.
Walter H. Pollak, Samuel J. Silverman, Leslie Handler and Nathan Friedman for defendants, respondents and appellants.
Frank W. Holmes for defendants, respondents.

Opinion:
On plaintiff's appeal from order granting a new trial as to the defendants Loverro et al., order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against plaintiff, appellant, on the stipulation, without costs.
On plaintiff's appeal from judgment, judgment affirmed, without costs.
On defendants' appeals, judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion. (See 276 N. Y. 610, 681.)
Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O'Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey/JJ.