Case Name: David BENJAMIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M.D. FHSD Carl J. KOENINGSMANN, M.D., Jonathan Holder, Orthopedist Referral, M.D. Galeno, Associate Orthopedist, M.D. Lester Silver, Provider, Stephen Schwartz, Orthopedic Surgeon, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-11-13
Citations: 204 F. App'x 979
Docket Number: No. 06-0622-pr
Parties: David BENJAMIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M.D. FHSD Carl J. KOENINGSMANN, M.D., Jonathan Holder, Orthopedist Referral, M.D. Galeno, Associate Orthopedist, M.D. Lester Silver, Provider, Stephen Schwartz, Orthopedic Surgeon, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 204
Pages: 979–979

Head Matter:
David BENJAMIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M.D. FHSD Carl J. KOENINGSMANN, M.D., Jonathan Holder, Orthopedist Referral, M.D. Galeno, Associate Orthopedist, M.D. Lester Silver, Provider, Stephen Schwartz, Orthopedic Surgeon, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 06-0622-pr.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Nov. 13, 2006.
David Benjamin, Stormville, NY, pro se.
Gregory Silbert, Assistant Solicitor General (Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, on the brief), State of New York, New York, NY, for State Defendants-Appellees.
Angela M. Ribaudo, (Samantha E. Quinn, on the brief), Schiavetti, Corgan, Soscia, DiEdwards, and Nicholson, LLP, for Defendant-Appellee Jonathan Holder, M.D.
PRESENT: WILFRED FEINBERG, PIERRE N. LEVAL and JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
SUMMARY ORDER
Plaintiff-appellant David Benjamin appeals pro se from a decision of the District Court granting, in part, defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiffs claims, see Benjamin v. Schwartz, 299 F.Supp.2d 196 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 8, 2004), and from two decisions granting defendants' motions for summary judgment. See Benjamin v. Koeningsmann, Nos. 02 CV 6227, 03 CV 825, (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 17, 2004) (granting defendant Holder's motion for summary judgment); Benjamin v. Galeno, 415 F.Supp.2d 254 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 3, 2005) (granting remaining state defendants' motion for summary judgment). Plaintiffs suit alleged that defendants showed deliberate indifference to his serious medicals need in violation of the Eighth Amendment during his incarceration at the Greenhaven Correctional Facility in Stormville, New York.
Upon a review of the record, and substantially for the reasons set forth in Judge McMahon's careful and comprehensive decisions, we conclude that the District Court did not err in (1) granting, in part, defendants' motions to dismiss, or (2) granting defendants' motions for summary judgment.
Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of the District Court.