Case Name: James Harry TOBIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1981-08-04
Citations: 401 So. 2d 938
Docket Number: No. AB-422
Parties: James Harry TOBIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SHAW, WENTWORTH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 401
Pages: 938–939

Head Matter:
James Harry TOBIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. AB-422.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Aug. 4, 1981.
James Harry Tobin, in pro. per.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant seeks review of the lower court's denial of his Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. We agree with the lower court's conclusion that appellant is not entitled to Rule 3.850 relief.
Appellant was convicted of several offenses contained in a multiple-count information, and sentenced to a total of 10 years imprisonment for some offenses, followed by 30 years probation for various other offenses. In Villery v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission, 396 So.2d 1107 (Fla. 1981) (revised opinion), the Florida Supreme Court ruled that the maximum period of incarceration which may be imposed as a condition of probation is up to, but not including, one year. The Villery court further indicated that this rule also applies to incarceration followed by a specified period of probation. However, we conclude that Villery applies only where incarceration and probation are imposed for the same offense, and does not prohibit incarceration for a year (or more) followed by a period of probation imposed for a separate offense, as in the present case.
The order appealed is affirmed.
SHAW, WENTWORTH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
. Note the Villery court's suggestion that the legislature "never contemplated the concurrent operation of parole and probation for the same offense.... [e. s.]