Case Name: COLLINS, qui tam against ROBERTS
Court: Vermont Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Vermont
Decision Date: 1817
Citations: 1 Brayt. 235
Docket Number: 
Parties: COLLINS, qui tam against ROBERTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: Brayton
Volume: 1
Pages: 235–236

Head Matter:
USURY,
COLLINS, qui tam against ROBERTS.
Bennington,
1817.

Opinion:
THE taking up of one sécuriíy and giving another, is not such an extinguishment of the first cohtract, as the' Statute óf limitations will attach, and prevent a recovery for usury where the declaration is founded on the Ji'rst contract, and the usurious money is proved to have been paid upon the last security: the; whole is considered as one entire contracto
See Jurisdiction 5.