Case Name: Marie Therese ASSA'AD-FALTAS, MD, MPH, for herself and those similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE SOUTH CAROLINA SUPREME COURT, solely in its legislative capacity; and solely for injunctive relief; Charles Austin, in his official capacity as City Manager for the City of Columbia ["the City" or "Columbia"]; Robert C. Coble, in his official capacity as Mayor for the City of Columbia, SC; Officer Sellers, in his official capacity as a police officer for Columbia; Officer Gordon, in his official capacity as a police officer for Columbia; Officer Dietz, in his official capacity as a police officer for Columbia; Officer Beddingfield, in his official capacity as a police officer for Columbia; Officer Anderson, in his official capacity as a police officer for Columbia; Gwendolyn Bouie, in her official capacity as Assistant Attorney for the City; Christa Bell, in her official capacity as Assistant Attorney for the City; Overture Walker, in his official capacity as Assistant Attorney for the City; Tameka Isaacs Devine, in her official capacity as member of City Council for the City of Columbia, SC and the other Council members in that capacity; James Meggs, in his official capacity as City Attorney for the City; Kenneth Gaines, in his official capacity as City Attorney for the City; Dana M. Thye, individually and officially as Assistant Attorney for the City; Robert G. Cooper, individually and officially as Assistant Attorney for the City; Unknown Named Agents for the City, in their respective official capacities, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-08-13
Citations: 391 F. App'x 258
Docket Number: No. 09-2081
Parties: Marie Therese ASSA’AD-FALTAS, MD, MPH, for herself and those similarly situated, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. THE SOUTH CAROLINA SUPREME COURT, solely in its legislative capacity; and solely for injunctive relief; Charles Austin, in his official capacity as City Manager for the City of Columbia [“the City” or “Columbia”]; Robert C. Coble, in his official capacity as Mayor for the City of Columbia, SC; Officer Sellers, in his official capacity as a police officer for Columbia; Officer Gordon, in his official capacity as a police officer for Columbia; Officer Dietz, in his official capacity as a police officer for Columbia; Officer Beddingfield, in his official capacity as a police officer for Columbia; Officer Anderson, in his official capacity as a police officer for Columbia; Gwendolyn Bouie, in her official capacity as Assistant Attorney for the City; Christa Bell, in her official capacity as Assistant Attorney for the City; Overture Walker, in his official capacity as Assistant Attorney for the City; Tameka Isaacs Devine, in her official capacity as member of City Council for the City of Columbia, SC and the other Council members in that capacity; James Meggs, in his official capacity as City Attorney for the City; Kenneth Gaines, in his official capacity as City Attorney for the City; Dana M. Thye, individually and officially as Assistant Attorney for the City; Robert G. Cooper, individually and officially as Assistant Attorney for the City; Unknown Named Agents for the City, in their respective official capacities, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 391
Pages: 258–259

Head Matter:
Marie Therese ASSA’AD-FALTAS, MD, MPH, for herself and those similarly situated, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. THE SOUTH CAROLINA SUPREME COURT, solely in its legislative capacity; and solely for injunctive relief; Charles Austin, in his official capacity as City Manager for the City of Columbia [“the City” or “Columbia”]; Robert C. Coble, in his official capacity as Mayor for the City of Columbia, SC; Officer Sellers, in his official capacity as a police officer for Columbia; Officer Gordon, in his official capacity as a police officer for Columbia; Officer Dietz, in his official capacity as a police officer for Columbia; Officer Beddingfield, in his official capacity as a police officer for Columbia; Officer Anderson, in his official capacity as a police officer for Columbia; Gwendolyn Bouie, in her official capacity as Assistant Attorney for the City; Christa Bell, in her official capacity as Assistant Attorney for the City; Overture Walker, in his official capacity as Assistant Attorney for the City; Tameka Isaacs Devine, in her official capacity as member of City Council for the City of Columbia, SC and the other Council members in that capacity; James Meggs, in his official capacity as City Attorney for the City; Kenneth Gaines, in his official capacity as City Attorney for the City; Dana M. Thye, individually and officially as Assistant Attorney for the City; Robert G. Cooper, individually and officially as Assistant Attorney for the City; Unknown Named Agents for the City, in their respective official capacities, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 09-2081.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 26, 2010.
Decided: Aug. 13, 2010.
Marie Therese Assa’ad-Faltas, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Marie Therese Assa'ad-Faltas, M.D., M.P.H., appeals the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation to summarily dismiss her complaint, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (2006), as well as its order denying her Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Assa'ad-Faltas's motions for appointment of counsel and to place the appeal in abeyance and affirm the district court's orders. See Assa'ad-Faltas v. South Carolina Supreme Court, No. 3:09-cv-00507-TLW (D.S.C. filed July 22, 2009, entered July 23, 2009; Aug. 24, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.