Case Name: In the Interest of R.J.M., B.M.M., D.J.M., Plaintiff. Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. R.D.M. (Father), Appellant, R.H. (Mother), Defendant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-08-16
Citations: 169 S.W.3d 178
Docket Number: Nos. WD 64947, WD 64948, WD 64949
Parties: In the Interest of R.J.M., B.M.M., D.J.M., Plaintiff. Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. R.D.M. (Father), Appellant, R.H. (Mother), Defendant.
Judges: Before: HARDWICK, P.J., BRECKENRIDGE and SPINDEN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 169
Pages: 178–179

Head Matter:
In the Interest of R.J.M., B.M.M., D.J.M., Plaintiff. Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. R.D.M. (Father), Appellant, R.H. (Mother), Defendant.
Nos. WD 64947, WD 64948, WD 64949.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Aug. 16, 2005.
Frederick P. Tucker, Macon, MO, for appellant.
James D. McConnell, Shelbyville, MO, for respondent.
Susan R. Barrow, Macon, MO, for R.J.M., B.M.M., and D.J.M. and Guardian.
Jill R. Creed, Macon, MO, for defendant.
Before: HARDWICK, P.J., BRECKENRIDGE and SPINDEN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
R.D.M. (Father) appeals from the judgments terminating parental rights to his sons, R.J.M. and D.J.M. Upon review of the record, we find the judgment is supported by evidence of Father's abuse and neglect, and that the termination was in the best interest of the children. The judgment is affirmed.
We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value. Rule 84.16(b).