Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency, "PHEAA", Third Party Defendant-Appellee, v. Cynthia Y. ALLEN-WILLIAMS, D.D.S., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-12-18
Citations: 499 F. App'x 326
Docket Number: No. 12-1983
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency, “PHEAA”, Third Party Defendant-Appellee, v. Cynthia Y. ALLEN-WILLIAMS, D.D.S., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 499
Pages: 326–326

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency, “PHEAA”, Third Party Defendant-Appellee, v. Cynthia Y. ALLEN-WILLIAMS, D.D.S., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-1983.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 6, 2012.
Decided: Dec. 18, 2012.
Cynthia Y. Alien-Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Frank Corcoran, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland; William D. Day, GILL, Sippel & Gallagher, Rockville, Maryland, for Ap-pellees.
Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Cynthia Y. Alien-Williams, D.D.S., appeals from the district court's memorandum and order entering judgment in favor of the United States in its action to recover amounts due on promissory notes executed in connection with two health education loans and granting the Third-Party Defendant, Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency, summary judgment on Alien-Williams' third-party complaint. We have thoroughly reviewed the record and the district court's memorandum and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Alien-Williams, No. 8:11-cv-01001-JFM, 2012 WL 2126546 (2012). We deny as moot Alien-Williams' motion to stay execution of the money judgment entered against her. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.