Case Name: The State, ex rel. Murphy, Appellant, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellees
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1980-03-19
Citations: 61 Ohio St. 2d 312
Docket Number: No. 79-1197
Parties: The State, ex rel. Murphy, Appellant, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellees.
Judges: Celebrezze, C. J., Herbert, W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Second Series
Volume: 61
Pages: 312–313

Head Matter:
The State, ex rel. Murphy, Appellant, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellees.
[Cite as State, ex rel. Murphy, v. Indus. Comm. (1980), 61 Ohio St. 2d 312.]
(No. 79-1197
Decided March 19, 1980.)
Messrs. Mancino, Mancino, & Mancino and Mr. Paul Mancino, Jr., for appellant.
Mr. William J. Brown, attorney general, and Mr. Gerald H. Waterman, for appellee Industrial. Commission.
Messrs. Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, and Mr. Robert W. Bishop, for appellee Cleveland Electric Illuminating.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
It is well established that the general rule in Ohio is that attorney fees are not recoverable as part of the costs of litigation in the absence of statutory authorization. See Sorin v. Bd. of Edn. (1976), 46 Ohio St. 2d 177. Appellant alleges that he is authorized to recover attorney's fees by R. C. 4123.519 and 2731.11. Neither statute is applicable, however. R. C. 4123.519 authorizes the recovery of attorney's fees in an appeal from the decision of the Industrial Commission. R. C. 2731.11 authorizes a court to award damages in a mandamus action. Appellant's attorney's fees are not recoverable as damages. See State, ex rel. Grosser, v. Boy (1976), 46 Ohio St. 2d 184.
Appellant alleges further that he is entitled to recover his attorney's fees for the mandamus action because it was necessitated by the commission's "bad faith, vexatious, wanton, obdurate or oppressive" actions. We hold, however, that appellant has not borne his burden of proof to establish any improper action by the commission. Thus, we do not decide whether such actions, if proven, would entitle one to recover attorney's fees.
Accordingly, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Celebrezze, C. J., Herbert, W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur.