Case Name: THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. William RODRIGUEZ, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1985-03-07
Citations: 465 So. 2d 530
Docket Number: No. 66051
Parties: THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. William RODRIGUEZ, Respondent.
Judges: ADKINS, Acting C.J., and OVERTON, ALDERMAN, McDONALD and EHRLICH, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 465
Pages: 530–530

Head Matter:
THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. William RODRIGUEZ, Respondent.
No. 66051.
Supreme Court of Florida.
March 7, 1985.
John F. Harkness, Jr. and John T. Berry, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, and David M. Barnovitz, Bar Counsel, Fort Lauderdale, for complainant.
William Rodriguez, in pro. per.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Upon a conditional guilty plea for consent judgment by respondent this Court appointed a referee to conduct a hearing regarding Rodriguez' alleged misconduct. Rodriguez acknowledged his violation of article XI, Rules 11.02(2), 11.02(3)(a), 11.-02(4) and Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(1), 1-102(A)(4), 1-102(A)(6), 9-102(A) and 9-102(B)(4). The referee recommended that Rodriguez be found guilty in accordance with his conditional plea and that he be given a public reprimand.
Neither side contests the referee's report which we hereby adopt. Publication of this opinion in Southern Reporter will serve as the public reprimand.
Judgment for costs in the amount of $1,048.55 is hereby entered against respondent, for which let execution issue.
It is so ordered.
ADKINS, Acting C.J., and OVERTON, ALDERMAN, McDONALD and EHRLICH, JJ., concur.