Case Name: TEXAS EASTERN TRANSMISSION CORPORATION, ETC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. WILDLIFE PRESERVES, INC., ETC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1966-03-14
Citations: 90 N.J. Super. 385
Docket Number: 
Parties: TEXAS EASTERN TRANSMISSION CORPORATION, ETC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. WILDLIFE PRESERVES, INC., ETC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 90
Pages: 385–385

Head Matter:
TEXAS EASTERN TRANSMISSION CORPORATION, ETC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. WILDLIFE PRESERVES, INC., ETC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued March 7, 1966
Decided March 14, 1966.
Before Judges Goldmann and Foley.
Mr. Francis E. P. McCarter argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Stuart A. Young, Jr., attorney; Mr. McCarter and Mr. Charles R. Merrill on the brief).
Mr. Thomas J. Bitar argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Jeffers & Mountain, attorneys; Mr. Robert J. Del Tufo, on the brief).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed, essentially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Long, reported in 89 N. J. Super. 1 (Law. Div. 1965).