Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marcus PLATER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-05-08
Citations: 34 F. App'x 103
Docket Number: No. 02-6260
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marcus PLATER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 34
Pages: 103–104

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marcus PLATER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-6260.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 25, 2002.
Decided May 8, 2002.
Marcus Plater, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Suzanne Skalla, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Marcus Plater seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. To the extent that Plater challenges the constitutionality of 21 U.S.C.A. § 841(b) (West 1999 & Supp. 2001), this claim fails as we have upheld the constitutionality of § 841(b). United States v. McAllister, 272 F.3d 228 (4th Cir.2001). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Plater, Nos. CR-99-559; CA-01-1489 (D.Md. Jan. 18, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.