Case Name: James HUDSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1979-10-02
Citations: 375 So. 2d 355
Docket Number: No. 79-1094
Parties: James HUDSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before PEARSON HUBBART and SCHWARTZ, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 375
Pages: 355–355

Head Matter:
James HUDSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 79-1094.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 2, 1979.
James Hudson, in pro. per.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before PEARSON HUBBART and SCHWARTZ, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellant seeks review of the summary denial without hearing of his motion seeking relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850. Although none of the numerous other grounds asserted by Hudson have even facial merit, he does allege that he was represented in the trial court, without his knowledge or consent, by legal interns who were not members of the Florida Bar. On the authority of Cheatham v. State, 364 So.2d 83 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), and Huckelbury v. State, 337 So.2d 400 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976), we reverse the order under review and remand for an evidentiary hearing on this ground alone.
Reversed and remanded.