Case Name: Leda Odeth Hernandez VELASQUEZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-01-16
Citations: 505 F. App'x 632
Docket Number: No. 11-70637
Parties: Leda Odeth Hernandez VELASQUEZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: SILVERMAN, BEA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 505
Pages: 632–633

Head Matter:
Leda Odeth Hernandez VELASQUEZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 11-70637.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 15, 2013.
Filed Jan. 16, 2013.
Leda Odeth Hernandez Velasquez, Los Angeles, CA, pro se.
Oil, Aimee J. Carmichael, Trial, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
Before: SILVERMAN, BEA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Leda Odeth Hernandez Velasquez, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order summarily affirming an immigration judge's ("U") decision. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law. Young v. Holder, 697 F.3d 976, 981 (9th Cir.2012) (en banc). "When the BIA summarily affirms the IJ's decision, we review the IJ's decision as the fihal agency action." Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184 (9th Cir.2006). We deny the petition for review.
The IJ did not err in concluding that Hernandez Velasquez was ineligible for cancellation of removal where the conviction record was inconclusive as to the controlled substance involved in her conviction. See Young, 697 F.3d at 990 ("A petitioner cannot carry the burden of demonstrating eligibility for cancellation of removal by establishing an inconclusive record of conviction.").
Hernandez Velasquez's remaining contentions are unavailing.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.