Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Justin E. CALLAHAN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-07-09
Citations: 70 F. App'x 179
Docket Number: No. 03-30244
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Justin E. CALLAHAN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 70
Pages: 179–180

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Justin E. CALLAHAN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 03-30244.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
July 9, 2003.
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Justin E. Callahan, federal prisoner # 03245-095, is currently serving a 180-month sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm. Callahan requests a certificate of appealability ("COA") to appeal the district court's denial of his motion to file an out-of-time 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Because Callahan's motion did not request habeas relief, he need not obtain a COA in order to proceed on appeal. Accordingly, his request for COA is DENIED AS UNNECESSARY.
Callahan's motion to file an out-of-time 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion was not accompanied by a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion on the merits. We agree with the reasoning of United States v. Leon, 203 F.3d 162 (2d Cir.2000), and conclude "that a federal court lacks jurisdiction to consider the timeliness of a § 2255 [motion] until a [motion] is actually filed." Id. at 163. Before the motion itself is filed, "there is no case or controversy to be heard, and any opinion we were to render on the timeliness issue would be merely advisory." Id. Accordingly, the district court's denial of Callahan's motion is AFFIRMED because the district court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the motion.
COA DENIED AS UNNECESSARY; AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.