Case Name: The Fitzgerald Brother Brewing Co., Appellant, v. Daniel Finnerty, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1900-02
Citations: 30 Misc. 784
Docket Number: 
Parties: The Fitzgerald Brother Brewing Co., Appellant, v. Daniel Finnerty, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 30
Pages: 784–785

Head Matter:
The Fitzgerald Brother Brewing Co., Appellant, v. Daniel Finnerty, Respondent.
Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan, rendered in favor of the defendant upon a trial had before the court without a jury.
The nature of the action and the material facts are stated in the opinion.
Lyman W. Redington, for appellant.
John Callahan, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This was an action to recover a deficiency arising under the foreclosure of a chattel mortgage. The proof clearly established the execution and delivery of the mortgage, default, sale under the mortgage and resulting deficiency. At the close of the entire case, defendant moved for judgment on the ground there was no proof of a sale under the mortgage. There was nothing in the case, however, to justify this contention. That a sale took place is clearly established by uncontradicted evidence.
The judgment rendered in favor of the defendant is without proof to support it, and must be reversed.
Present: Beekman, P. J.; Giegerich and O'Gorman, JJ.
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.