Case Name: Casey HOLLINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-10-23
Citations: 383 S.W.3d 66
Docket Number: No. ED 97556
Parties: Casey HOLLINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., C.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 383
Pages: 66–66

Head Matter:
Casey HOLLINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 97556.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Oct. 23, 2012.
Gwenda Renee Robinson, Missouri Public Defender Office, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Daniel N. McPherson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., C.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Casey Hollins appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court did not err in denying Hollins' request for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).