Case Name: In re: Marion Edward PEARSON, Jr., Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-12-22
Citations: 304 F. App'x 215
Docket Number: No. 08-1413
Parties: In re: Marion Edward PEARSON, Jr., Petitioner.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 304
Pages: 215–215

Head Matter:
In re: Marion Edward PEARSON, Jr., Petitioner.
No. 08-1413.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 19, 2008.
Decided: Dec. 22, 2008.
Marion Edward Pearson, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se.
Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Marion Edward Pearson, Jr., petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the docket sheet reveals that the district court recently denied Pearson's § 2254 petition. Accordingly, because the district court has decided Pearson's case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.