Case Name: MARIE C. SCHANTZ, RESPONDENT, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1935-05-17
Citations: 115 N.J.L. 174
Docket Number: 
Parties: MARIE C. SCHANTZ, RESPONDENT, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 115
Pages: 174–175

Head Matter:
MARIE C. SCHANTZ, RESPONDENT, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY, APPELLANT.
Argued February 7, 1935
Decided May 17, 1935.
For the respondent, Charles B. McGinley.
For the appellant, Jacob L. Newman.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Lloyd in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Parker, Bodihe, Heher, Perskie, Yah Buskirk, Kays, Dear, Wells, JJ. 9.
For reversal — None.