Case Name: Edward C. Amer et al., Respondents, v. John Folk et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1900-11
Citations: 32 Misc. 733
Docket Number: 
Parties: Edward C. Amer et al., Respondents, v. John Folk et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 32
Pages: 733–733

Head Matter:
Edward C. Amer et al., Respondents, v. John Folk et al., Appellants.
Appeal from a judgment and order of the General Term of the City Court of the city of New York, affirming a judgment, rendered at Trial Term.
Hastings & Gleason (George S. Hastings, of counsel), for appellants.
Blumenstiel & Hirsch (Morris J. Hirsch, of counsel), for respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The only question in this case was whether there had been an accord and satisfaction between the parties. This issue was submitted to the jury by a charge which correctly followed the opinion delivered when this case was here on a former appeal. Amer v. Folk, 28 Misc. Rep. 508. The evidence was conflicting and amply supported the judgment rendered against the defendants.
The order denying the defendants' motion to set aside the verdict is not appealable to this court.
Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.