Case Name: Eugene N. BARNES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2015-02-03
Citations: 453 S.W.3d 865
Docket Number: No. ED 101218
Parties: Eugene N. BARNES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 453
Pages: 865–865

Head Matter:
Eugene N. BARNES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 101218
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Filed: February 3, 2015
Lisa M. Stroup, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for Mov-ant/Appellant.
Andrew C. Hooper, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for Respondent/Respondent.
Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Eugene N. Barnes appeals from the motion court's judgment dismissing his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 24.035, following an eviden-tiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim.P. 2013, unless otherwise indicated.