Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel MORENO-PRETEL, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-08-29
Citations: 580 F. App'x 272
Docket Number: No. 13-41211
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel MORENO-PRETEL, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 580
Pages: 272–273

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel MORENO-PRETEL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-41211
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 29, 2014.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Timothy William Crooks, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Michael Lance Herman, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before CLEMENT, PRADO, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Daniel Moreno-Pretel (Moreno) raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Morales-Mota, 704 F.3d 410, 412 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 2374, 185 L.Ed.2d 1091 (2013), which rejected the argument that the Texas offense of "burglary of a habitation" is broader than the generic, contemporary definition of "burglary of a dwelling" under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii) because it defines the "owner" of a habitation as a person with a "greater right to possession of the property than the actor." Moreno's motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.