Case Name: HOFFSTAETTER, Respondent, v. SCHINKEL et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1913-05-23
Citations: 141 N.Y.S. 1123
Docket Number: 
Parties: HOFFSTAETTER, Respondent, v. SCHINKEL et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 141
Pages: 1123–1123

Head Matter:
HOFFSTAETTER, Respondent, v. SCHINKEL et al., Appellants.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
May 23, 1913.)
Action by Lillian B. Hoffstaetter against Charles G. Sehinkel and others. O. O. Maas, of New York City, for appellants. L. H. Porter, of New York City, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Order filed. See, also, 150 App. Div. 925, 135 N. Y. Supp. 1118.
INGRAHAM, P. J., and LAUGHLIN, J., dissent.