Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Edward T. Beldegreen, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1948-07-16
Citations: 298 N.Y. 601
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Edward T. Beldegreen, Appellant.
Judges: Concur: LoughraN, Ch. J., Lewis, Thacher and Dye, JJ. DesmoND and JJ., dissent on the ground that section 270-a of the Penal Law, which is headed‘ ‘ Soliciting business on behalf of an attorney ” was not designed to, and does not apply to attorneys. Taking no part: CoNway, J.
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 298
Pages: 601–602

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Edward T. Beldegreen, Appellant.
Argued June 7, 1948;
decided July 16, 1948.
Myron J. Greene and Martin Greene for appellant.
Frank S. Hogan, District Attorney (Eugene A. Leiman and Whitman Knapp of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed; no opinion. [See 298 N. Y. 641.]
Concur: LoughraN, Ch. J., Lewis, Thacher and Dye, JJ. DesmoND and JJ., dissent on the ground that section 270-a of the Penal Law, which is headed' ' Soliciting business on behalf of an attorney " was not designed to, and does not apply to attorneys. Taking no part: CoNway, J.