Case Name: Disciplinary Counsel v. Emerson
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2008-11-14
Citations: 120 Ohio St. 3d 1206
Docket Number: No. 2008-1874
Parties: Disciplinary Counsel v. Emerson.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 120
Pages: 1206–1207

Head Matter:
Disciplinary Counsel v. Emerson.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Emerson, 120 Ohio St.3d 1206, 2008-Ohio-6352.]
(No. 2008-1874
Submitted November 4, 2008
Decided November 14, 2008.)

Opinion:
{¶ 1} This cause is pending before the Supreme Court of Ohio in accordance with the reciprocal discipline provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(11)(F).
{¶ 2} On September 22, 2008, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, filed with this court a certified copy of an order of the Supreme Court of Kentucky entered August 22, 2008, in Kentucky Bar Association v. Eric Lamar Emerson, in Case No. 2008-SC-000353-KB, 260 S.W.3d 782, publicly reprimanding respondent. On October 17, 2008, this court ordered respondent to show cause why identical or comparable discipline should not be imposed in this state. Respondent filed no response to the show cause order. This cause was considered by the court and on consideration thereof,
{¶ 3} It is ordered and adjudged by this court that pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(11)(F)(4), respondent, Eric Lamar Emerson, Attorney Registration No. 0072916, last known business address in Covington, Kentucky, be publicly reprimanded.
{¶ 4} It is further ordered, sua sponte, by the court that within 90 days of the date of this order, respondent shall reimburse any amounts that have been awarded against the respondent by the Clients' Security Fund pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VIII(7)(F). It is further ordered, sua sponte, by the court that if, after the date of this order, the Clients' Security Fund awards any amount against the respondent pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VIII(7)(F), the respondent shall reimburse that amount to the Clients' Security Fund within 90 days of the notice of such award.
{¶ 5} It is further ordered, sua sponte, that service shall be deemed made on respondent by sending this order, and all other orders in this case, by certified mail to the most recent address respondent has given to the Office of Attorney Services.
{¶ 6} It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.
Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.