Case Name: Wright v. The State
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1925-11-10
Citations: 34 Ga. App. 505
Docket Number: 16665
Parties: Wright v. The State.
Judges: Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., eoneur.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 34
Pages: 505–505

Head Matter:
16665.
Wright v. The State.
Decided November 10, 1925.
Clark Bay, 0. Glen Bay, W. F. Moore, for plaintiff in error.
John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, Balph H. Pharr, contra.

Opinion:
Bboyx.es, 0. J.
1. The alleged newly discovered evidence is cumulative and impeaching in its character, and is not such evidence as would likely produce a different verdict upon another trial of the case. Furthermore, the supporting affidavit, as to the residence, associates, etc., of the newly discovered witness, is defective in that it is silent as to his associates. Civil Code (1910), § 6086; Ivey v. State, 154 Ga. 63 (6) (113 S. E. 175).
2. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence.
Judgment affirmed.
Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., eoneur.