Case Name: Ed PLAUT, His Wife, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SPENDTHRIFT FARM, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1993-10-14
Citations: 11 F.3d 572
Docket Number: No. 92-5591
Parties: Ed PLAUT, His Wife, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SPENDTHRIFT FARM, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before KEITH and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges; and CHURCHILL, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 11
Pages: 572–573

Head Matter:
Ed PLAUT, His Wife, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SPENDTHRIFT FARM, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 92-5591.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Oct. 14, 1993.
Before KEITH and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges; and CHURCHILL, District Judge.
Hon. James P. Churchill, Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Michi- . gan, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
ORDER
PRIOR REPORT: 1 F.3d 1487
The court having received two petitions for rehearing en banc, and the petitions having been circulated not only to the original panel -members but also to all other active judges of this court, and less than a majority of the judges having favored the suggestion, the petitions for rehearing have been referred to the original hearing panel.
The panel has further reviewed the petitions for rehearing and concludes that the issues raised in the petitions were fully considered upon the original submission and decision of the case. Accordingly, the petitions are denied.