Case Name: McKinley Bramble v. The State
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1928-04-04
Citations: 109 Tex. Crim. 422
Docket Number: No. 11477
Parties: McKinley Bramble v. The State.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Criminal Reports
Volume: 109
Pages: 422–423

Head Matter:
McKinley Bramble v. The State.
No. 11477.
Delivered April 4, 1928.
The opinion states the case.
No brief filed for appellant.
A. A. DawsoW of Canton, State’s Attorney, for the State.

Opinion:
LATTIMORE, Judge.
Conviction for burglary, punishment two years in the penitentiary.
The motion for new trial in this case was overruled on July 29, 1927. Ninety days was given in which to file bills of exception and statement of facts. Same were filed on October 28, 1927. This was after the expiration of the ninety days allowed by statute and by order of the court. The case thus comes before us without any bills of exception or statement of facts. The indictment correctly sets out the offense and is followed by the charge of the court, and by the judgment and sentence.
No error appearing, the judgment will be affirmed.
Affirmed....