Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Dennis SNIDER, Defendant/Appellant; Dennis SNIDER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1996-02-20
Citations: 916 S.W.2d 418
Docket Number: Nos. 64432, 67638
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Dennis SNIDER, Defendant/Appellant. Dennis SNIDER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and DOWD, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 916
Pages: 418–418

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Dennis SNIDER, Defendant/Appellant. Dennis SNIDER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Nos. 64432, 67638.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Feb. 20, 1996.
Rose M. Wibbenmeyer, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., David R. Truman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and DOWD, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals after his conviction by a jury for three counts of felony stealing, § 570.030, RSMo 1986. The court sentenced him as a prior and persistent offender to consecutive prison terms of ten years on each count. Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).