Case Name: In the Interest of Tasha VOSBURG, a/k/a Tasha Vosburgh, a Minor. Appeal of Wade VOSBURG and Shirley Vosburg, his wife. In the Interest of Tasha VOSBURG, a/k/a Tasha Vosburgh, a Minor. Appeal of LACKAWANNA COUNTY CHILDREN & YOUTH SERVICES
Court: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1982-10-08
Citations: 305 Pa. Super. 107
Docket Number: Appeals Nos. 790 and 1212
Parties: In the Interest of Tasha VOSBURG, a/k/a Tasha Vosburgh, a Minor. Appeal of Wade VOSBURG and Shirley Vosburg, his wife. In the Interest of Tasha VOSBURG, a/k/a Tasha Vosburgh, a Minor. Appeal of LACKAWANNA COUNTY CHILDREN & YOUTH SERVICES.
Judges: Before HOFFMAN, WICKERSHAM and VAN der VOORT, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania Superior Court Reports
Volume: 305
Pages: 107–108

Head Matter:
451 A.2d 265
In the Interest of Tasha VOSBURG, a/k/a Tasha Vosburgh, a Minor. Appeal of Wade VOSBURG and Shirley Vosburg, his wife. In the Interest of Tasha VOSBURG, a/k/a Tasha Vosburgh, a Minor. Appeal of LACKAWANNA COUNTY CHILDREN & YOUTH SERVICES.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued Sept. 10, 1980.
Filed Oct. 8, 1982.
Charles J. Aliano, Susquehanna, for Wade and Shirley Vosburg, appellants, (at No. 790) and participating parties (at No. 1212).
George Houck, Scranton, for Lackawanna County, appellant, (at No. 1212) and participating party (at No. 790).
John C. Mascelli, Scranton, for O’Donnell participating parties.
Before HOFFMAN, WICKERSHAM and VAN der VOORT, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
By Order Per Curiam, filed on April 20, 1981, we remanded this custody case for prompt supplementation of the record and we retained jurisdiction. We have since been advised by the lower court that the parties effected an agreement in October 1981 concerning visitation and custody of the above named minor and that currently a petition for a contempt citation for violation of the agreement is pending below. Therefore, we relinquish jurisdiction of this case to permit the lower court to enter whatever order it deems appropriate. The parties may then take an appeal from any subsequent final order.