Case Name: COVENANT PALMS OF MIAMI, INC., a/k/a Covenant Palms of Miami, a non-profit corporation, Appellant, v. Oscar Arthur GUSTAFSON and Amy Esther Gustafson, his wife, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1968-02-27
Citations: 207 So. 2d 488
Docket Number: No. 67-285
Parties: COVENANT PALMS OF MIAMI, INC., a/k/a Covenant Palms of Miami, a non-profit corporation, Appellant, v. Oscar Arthur GUSTAFSON and Amy Esther Gustafson, his wife, Appellees.
Judges: Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and BARKDULL and HENDRY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 207
Pages: 488–489

Head Matter:
COVENANT PALMS OF MIAMI, INC., a/k/a Covenant Palms of Miami, a non-profit corporation, Appellant, v. Oscar Arthur GUSTAFSON and Amy Esther Gustafson, his wife, Appellees.
No. 67-285.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
Feb. 27, 1968.
Rehearing Denied March 22, 1968.
Butler, Swope & Manning, Miami Shores, for appellant.
Montague Rosenberg, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.
Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and BARKDULL and HENDRY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The basic question in this appeal is whether the evidence before the chancellor sufficiently supports the decree in favor of the appellee, defendant-counter-claimant. We have carefully examined the record on appeal and find no basis for disturbing the decree appealed. Alvarez v. Dumont, Fla.App.1965, 178 So.2d 352; Central Bank and Trust Co. v. Banner Trading Co., Fla.App.1963, 157 So.2d 201; Turner v. Noto, Fla.App.1963, 151 So.2d 303; DiMarco v. King, Fla.App.1962, 139 So.2d 750.
Affirmed.