Case Name: Curtis LYLES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2016-02-09
Citations: 481 S.W.3d 601
Docket Number: No. ED 102704
Parties: Curtis LYLES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before Lisa S. Van.Amburg, C.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Kurt S.Odenwald, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 481
Pages: 601–602

Head Matter:
Curtis LYLES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 102704
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
Filed: February 9, 2016
Maleaner' R. Harvey, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for Movant/Appellant.
Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., P.O. Box 899,'Jefferson City, MO 65102, for Respondent/Respondent.
Before Lisa S. Van.Amburg, C.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Kurt S.Odenwald, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Curtis Lyles appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary héaring. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k); Brooks v. State, 242 S.W.3d 705, 708 (Mo. banc 2008). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the réasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. Mo. R. Crim. P. 2014.