Case Name: PAKAS v. HURLEY
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1912-02-02
Citations: 133 N.Y.S. 499
Docket Number: 
Parties: PAKAS v. HURLEY.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 133
Pages: 499–500

Head Matter:
PAKAS v. HURLEY.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
February 2, 1912.)
On rehearing.
Former opinion affirmed.
For former opinion, see 131 N. Y. Supp. 454. See, also, 132 N. Y. Supp. 1140.
Argued before INGRAHAM, P. J., and LAUGHLIN, CLARKE, McLaughlin, and scott, jj.

Opinion:
SCOTT, J.
We have carefully re-examined this case, and remain of the opinion that the judgment must be reversed, and a new trial granted, and this for the reasons stated by Mr. Justice Miller on the former hearing. The slight discrepancy between the facts as stated in that opinion and as they appeared by the evidence is unimportant, if, as we consider, the true measure of damage is the amount of rents collected for stores and apartments, less the sums actually and necessarily expended in so running the building as to retain the tenants, and so make any collection of rents possible.
Judgment reversed, and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event.
INGRAHAM, P. J., and McLAUGHLIN and CLARKE, JJ., concur.