Case Name: John Anthony ESPOSITO, Appellant, v. John H. KLINGER et al., Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1967-07-17
Citations: 381 F.2d 13
Docket Number: No. 21491
Parties: John Anthony ESPOSITO, Appellant, v. John H. KLINGER et al., Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 381
Pages: 13–14

Head Matter:
John Anthony ESPOSITO, Appellant, v. John H. KLINGER et al., Appellees.
No. 21491.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
July 17, 1967.
John A. Esposito, in pro. per., Donald S. Emmer, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant (argued).
Thomas Lynch, Atty. Gen., Stanton J. Price, Asst. Atty. Gen., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees.
Before CHAMBERS, HAMLEY and HAMLIN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The final order of the district court of July 25, 1966, is affirmed insofar as it dismisses the complaint and the action as to the State of California. Also, this court agrees that Esposito was not entitled to a summary judgment.
However, this court is of the opinion that it is possible that the appellant (plaintiff) might be able to state a cause of action against the individual defendants if permitted to amend. Therefore, the district court should vacate its final order of July 25, 1966, insofar as necessary to permit Esposito to file an amended complaint.