Case Name: Willie RANDLE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2017-06-20
Citations: 520 S.W.3d 826
Docket Number: ED 104493
Parties: Willie RANDLE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Colleen Dolan, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 520
Pages: 826–826

Head Matter:
Willie RANDLE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
ED 104493
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Filed: June 20, 2017
Timothy J. Forneris, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Movant/Appellant.
Karen L. Kramer, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent/Respondent.
Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Colleen Dolan, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Willie Randle appeals from the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing; We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k); Little v. State, 427 S.W.3d 846, 850 (Mo. App. E.D. 2014). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. 2014, unless otherwise indicated.