Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Andres Diaz-Olmo, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2017-03-22
Citations: 148 A.D.3d 1047
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Andres Diaz-Olmo, Appellant.
Judges: Austin, J.P., Miller, LaSalle and Connolly, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 148
Pages: 1047–1047

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Andres Diaz-Olmo, Appellant.
[48 NYS3d 618]

Opinion:
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Shillingford, J.), rendered July 23, 2014, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 349 [2007]; People v Perry, 122 AD3d 775 [2014]; People v Kenner, 77 AD3d 853 [2010]; People v Wade, 41 AD3d 288 [2007]). Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]; People v Danielson, 9 NY3d at 348), we nevertheless accord great deference to the jury's opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor (see People v Mateo, 2 NY3d 383, 410 [2004]; People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]).
Austin, J.P., Miller, LaSalle and Connolly, JJ., concur.