Case Name: Rosina VanZelf, Respondent, v. Robert B. Shaad, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1989-03-10
Citations: 148 A.D.2d 1013
Docket Number: 
Parties: Rosina VanZelf, Respondent, v Robert B. Shaad, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 148
Pages: 1013–1014

Head Matter:
Rosina VanZelf, Respondent, v Robert B. Shaad, Appellant.

Opinion:
Motion granted and appellant is directed to perfect the appeal upon a full record or a more complete appen dix containing the testimony necessary to consider the issues raised by respondent, including whether the findings are against the weight of the evidence. (See, Siegel, Practice Commentaries, McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR 5528; 22 NYCRR 1000.5 [c] [2].) Present^-Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.