Case Name: Donald MCCLELLAND, Appellant, v. Russell KRUSE, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2010-08-24
Citations: 323 S.W.3d 36
Docket Number: No. ED 94433
Parties: Donald MCCLELLAND, Appellant, v. Russell KRUSE, Respondent.
Judges: Before KURT S. ODENWALD, P.J. and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR. and NANNETTE A. BAKER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 323
Pages: 36–36

Head Matter:
Donald MCCLELLAND, Appellant, v. Russell KRUSE, Respondent.
No. ED 94433.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Aug. 24, 2010.
Rehearing Denied Oct. 7, 2010.
Frank A. Conard, St. Peters, MO, for Appellant.
Jeffrey 0. Parshall, Columbia, MO, for Respondent.
Before KURT S. ODENWALD, P.J. and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR. and NANNETTE A. BAKER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Donald McClelland appeals from the dismissal of his petition for legal malpractice against Russell Kruse. McClelland contends the trial court erred in dismissing his petition because the statute of limitations had not run on his claim.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).