Case Name: In the Matter of the Application of the NEW YORK FOUNDLING HOSPITAL, a Corporation, for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. NEW YORK FOUNDLING HOSPITAL, Petitioner, v. EDWARD GIBSON, in the custody of James E. Hargis; SAME v. AMBROSE LAMB, in the custody of James Edgerton; SAME v. MARIE MACK, in the custody of John C. Tyler; SAME v. RAYMOND SPENCER, in the custody of Mrs. Rose Hill; SAME v. JOSEPH RYAN, in the custody of C. C. Reed; SAME v. CATHARINE FITZPATRICK, in the custody of Harry Wright; SAME v. SADIE GREEN, in the custody of Mrs. Olive Freeman; SAME v. EDWARD CUMMISKY, in the custody of J. T. Kelly; SAME v. GEORGE WEBER, in the custody of George W. High; SAME v. PEARL KENDRICKS, in the custody of W. H. Cooper; SAME v. HANNAH KANE, in the custody of John Doe; SAME v. ANNA LOUISE DOHERTY, in the custody of Thomas Simpson; SAME v. JEROME SHANLEY, in the custody of C. F. Pascoe; SAME v. GABRIELLA WELSH, in the custody of Hugh Quinn; SAME v. VIOLET LANOVICK, in the custody of Rebecca H. Tong; SAME v. ELIZABETH KANE, in the custody of Sam Abraham
Court: Arizona Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Arizona
Decision Date: 1905-01-21
Citations: 9 Ariz. 352
Docket Number: Criminal No. 202; Criminal No. 203; Criminal No. 204; Criminal No. 205; Criminal No. 206; Criminal No. 207; Criminal No. 208; Criminal No. 210; Criminal No. 211; Criminal No. 212; Criminal No. 213; Criminal No. 214; Criminal No. 215; Criminal No. 216; Criminal No. 217; Criminal No. 218
Parties: In the Matter of the Application of the NEW YORK FOUNDLING HOSPITAL, a Corporation, for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. NEW YORK FOUNDLING HOSPITAL, Petitioner, v. EDWARD GIBSON, in the custody of James E. Hargis. SAME v. AMBROSE LAMB, in the custody of James Edgerton. SAME v. MARIE MACK, in the custody of John C. Tyler. SAME v. RAYMOND SPENCER, in the custody of Mrs. Rose Hill. SAME v. JOSEPH RYAN, in the custody of C. C. Reed. SAME v. CATHARINE FITZPATRICK, in the custody of Harry Wright. SAME v. SADIE GREEN, in the custody of Mrs. Olive Freeman. SAME v. EDWARD CUMMISKY, in the custody of J. T. Kelly. SAME v. GEORGE WEBER, in the custody of George W. High. SAME v. PEARL KENDRICKS, in the custody of W. H. Cooper. SAME v. HANNAH KANE, in the custody of John Doe. SAME v. ANNA LOUISE DOHERTY, in the custody of Thomas Simpson. SAME v. JEROME SHANLEY, in the custody of C. F. Pascoe. SAME v. GABRIELLA WELSH, in the custody of Hugh Quinn. SAME v. VIOLET LANOVICK, in the custody of Rebecca H. Tong. SAME v. ELIZABETH KANE, in the custody of Sam Abraham.
Judges: 
Reporter: Arizona Reports
Volume: 9
Pages: 352–354

Head Matter:
[Criminal No. 202.]
[Criminal No. 203.]
[Criminal No. 204.]
[Criminal No. 205.]
In the Matter of the Application of the NEW YORK FOUNDLING HOSPITAL, a Corporation, for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. NEW YORK FOUNDLING HOSPITAL, Petitioner, v. EDWARD GIBSON, in the custody of James E. Hargis. SAME v. AMBROSE LAMB, in the custody of James Edgerton. SAME v. MARIE MACK, in the custody of John C. Tyler. SAME v. RAYMOND SPENCER, in the custody of Mrs. Rose Hill. SAME v. JOSEPH RYAN, in the custody of C. C. Reed. SAME v. CATHARINE FITZPATRICK, in the custody of Harry Wright. SAME v. SADIE GREEN, in the custody of Mrs. Olive Freeman. SAME v. EDWARD CUMMISKY, in the custody of J. T. Kelly. SAME v. GEORGE WEBER, in the custody of George W. High. SAME v. PEARL KENDRICKS, in the custody of W. H. Cooper. SAME v. HANNAH KANE, in the custody of John Doe. SAME v. ANNA LOUISE DOHERTY, in the custody of Thomas Simpson. SAME v. JEROME SHANLEY, in the custody of C. F. Pascoe. SAME v. GABRIELLA WELSH, in the custody of Hugh Quinn. SAME v. VIOLET LANOVICK, in the custody of Rebecca H. Tong. SAME v. ELIZABETH KANE, in the custody of Sam Abraham.
[Criminal No. 206.]
[Criminal No. 207.]
[Criminal No. 208.]
[Criminal No. 210.]
[Criminal No. 211.]
[Criminal No. 212.]
[Criminal No. 213.]
[Criminal No. 214.]
[Criminal No. 215.]
[Criminal No. 216.]
[Criminal No. 217.]
[Criminal No. 218.]
Eugene S. Ives, and Thomas D. Bennett, for Applicant.
January 21,1905.

Opinion:
Writ dismissed. For the reasons set forth in the opinion filed in the case of the New York Foundling Hospital v. John Gatti, No. 209, ante, p. 105, the writs of habeas corpus issued in these cases are dismissed as per stipulation on file in said cause.