Case Name: S. N. Greeenlee, Clerk, Village of Manchester, v. Robert Cole; S. N. Greenlee, Clerk, Village of Manchester v. Jasper McCreary; Joseph Shriver, etc., v. S. N. Greenlee, Clerk, et al.
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1925
Citations: 3 Ohio Law Abs. 756
Docket Number: No. 19290; No. 19292; No. 19315
Parties: S. N. Greeenlee, Clerk, Village of Manchester, v. Robert Cole. S. N. Greenlee, Clerk, Village of Manchester v. Jasper McCreary. Joseph Shriver, etc., v. S. N. Greenlee, Clerk, et al.
Judges: Marshall, CJ., Jones, Day, Allen and Kin-kade, JJ., concur. Robinson, J., not participating.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 3
Pages: 756–756

Head Matter:
No. 990
No. 19290
No. 19292
No. 19315
S. N. Greeenlee, Clerk, Village of Manchester, v. Robert Cole. S. N. Greenlee, Clerk, Village of Manchester v. Jasper McCreary. Joseph Shriver, etc., v. S. N. Greenlee, Clerk, et al.
Error to the Court of Appeals of Adams county.
In Mandamus.
865. OFFICE AND to office of an officer de facto cannot be determined in a suit to which he is not a party, nor can his authorized act as such officer be challenged in a collateral proceeding.
747. MANDAMUS—In an action in mandamus to compel the clerk to perform duties prescribed by statute respecting employes duly appointed, an answer attacking the title to such office, he being in possession of such office and acting under color of title and not being made a party to such suit, there is no valid defense.

Opinion:
MATTHIAS, J.
1. The title to office of an officer de facto cannot be determined in a suit to which he is not a party, nor can his authorized act as such officer be challenged in a collateral proceeding.
2. In an action in mandamus to compel the clerk and treasurer of a village to perform duties prescribed by statute respecting the payment of employes duly appointed by the board of trustees of public affairs, and also respecting the receipt of reports of such board relative to the operation of _ the municipal electric light plant of the village, and the acceptance of funds from such operation, an answer attacking the title to office • of such trustees and challenging their authority, they being in possession of such office and acting under color of title and not being parties to such suit, is not a valid defense.
Case No. 19290, Judgment affirmed.
Case No. 19292, Judgment affirmed.
Case No. 19315, Writ allowed.
Marshall, CJ., Jones, Day, Allen and Kin-kade, JJ., concur. Robinson, J., not participating.