Case Name: Marvin SCHERE, Appellant, v. Rhoda SCHERE, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-09-21
Citations: 623 So. 2d 869
Docket Number: Nos. 92-2084, 92-2066
Parties: Marvin SCHERE, Appellant, v. Rhoda SCHERE, Appellee.
Judges: Before COPE, LEVY and GODERICH, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 623
Pages: 869–870

Head Matter:
Marvin SCHERE, Appellant, v. Rhoda SCHERE, Appellee.
Nos. 92-2084, 92-2066.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Sept. 21, 1993.
Shea & Gould, Jay D. Schwartz, Elizabeth S. Baker and Alberto A. Macia, Miami, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Giselle D. Lylen, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.
Before COPE, LEVY and GODERICH, JJ.

Opinion:
ON CONFESSION OF ERROR
PER CURIAM.
As the State of Florida correctly concedes, the trial court erred in not complying with the provisions of Rule 3.840 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure when the trial court found the appellant to be guilty of indirect criminal contempt. Accordingly, that adjudication of contempt must be reversed. See Goral v. State, 553 So.2d 1282 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).
Said reversal is without prejudice to the initiation of any further contempt proceedings that the trial court may deem appropriate. In view of the State's confession of error as to issue one in this case, the remaining issues are rendered moot.
Reversed and remanded.