Case Name: Angelo B. HAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-10-26
Citations: 252 F. App'x 544
Docket Number: No. 07-7239
Parties: Angelo B. HAM, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 252
Pages: 544–544

Head Matter:
Angelo B. HAM, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 07-7239.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 18, 2007.
Decided: Oct. 26, 2007.
Angelo B. Ham, Appellant pro se.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Angelo B. Ham appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ham v. South Carolina Dep't of Corrections, No. 6:07-cv-01626-DCN, 2007 WL 2350961 (D.S.C. Aug. 15, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.