Case Name: Edward L. Katzenbach, attorney-general, respondent, v. Armstrong Cork Company, appellant
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1928-02-06
Citations: 102 N.J. Eq. 333
Docket Number: 
Parties: Edward L. Katzenbach, attorney-general, respondent, v. Armstrong Cork Company, appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 102
Pages: 333–334

Head Matter:
Edward L. Katzenbach, attorney-general, respondent, v. Armstrong Cork Company, appellant.
[Decided February 6th, 1928.]
Mr. Henry J. Gaede, for the respondent.
Messrs. Starr, Summerill & Lloyd, for the appellant.

Opinion:
Pee Oueiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis, and reported in 99 N. J. Eq. 82.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Teenohaed, Pakkee, Mintuen, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Deak, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.