Case Name: David A. BURNETT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-01-18
Citations: 9 S.W.3d 725
Docket Number: No. ED 76342
Parties: David A. BURNETT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before MARY RHODES RUSSELL, C.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, J., and LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 9
Pages: 725–725

Head Matter:
David A. BURNETT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 76342.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Jan. 18, 2000.
Gary E. Brotherton, Craig Johnston, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Linda Lemke, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before MARY RHODES RUSSELL, C.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, J., and LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
David Burnett (Movant) files this appeal challenging the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without a hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).