Case Name: Richard E. CROATT and Violet M. Croatt, Appellants, v. SHAW-LUNDQUIST ASSOCIATES, INC., Respondent; and SHOLOM HOMES, INC., et al., Defendants, v. VICKERMAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Third-Party Defendant, Respondent
Court: Minnesota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Minnesota
Decision Date: 1984-04-06
Citations: 346 N.W.2d 645
Docket Number: No. C5-82-1066
Parties: Richard E. CROATT and Violet M. Croatt, Appellants, v. SHAW-LUNDQUIST ASSOCIATES, INC., Respondent, and SHOLOM HOMES, INC., et al., Defendants, v. VICKERMAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Third-Party Defendant, Respondent.
Judges: COYNE, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Reporter: North Western Reporter 2d
Volume: 346
Pages: 645–646

Head Matter:
Richard E. CROATT and Violet M. Croatt, Appellants, v. SHAW-LUNDQUIST ASSOCIATES, INC., Respondent, and SHOLOM HOMES, INC., et al., Defendants, v. VICKERMAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Third-Party Defendant, Respondent.
No. C5-82-1066.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
April 6, 1984.
Oberg & Mannikko, Joseph L. Mannikko, Wayzata, Nichols, Kruger, Starks & Car-ruthers, Donald H. Nichols, Minneapolis, for appellants.
Meagher, Geer, Markham, Anderson, Ad-amson, Plaskamp & Brennan, R.D. Blanchard, Laura S. Underkuffler, Minneapolis, for respondent Shaw-Lundquist Assoc.
Bassford, Heckt, Lockhart & Mullin, P.A., Jerome C. Briggs, Minneapolis, for defendants.
Murnane, Conlin, White, Brandt & Hoffman, Thomas M. Conlin, Michael J. Dwyer, St. Paul, for respondent Vickerman Const. Co.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The court being evenly divided on the issues presented for decision in this matter, the order of the Hennepin County District Court dated July 6, 1982, is hereby affirmed.
COYNE, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.