Case Name: JAMES W. SHUGART, Appellant, v. JOYCE A. SHUGART, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada
Jurisdiction: Nevada
Decision Date: 1975-10-30
Citations: 91 Nev. 685
Docket Number: No. 7914
Parties: JAMES W. SHUGART, Appellant, v. JOYCE A. SHUGART, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Nevada Reports
Volume: 91
Pages: 685–686

Head Matter:
JAMES W. SHUGART, Appellant, v. JOYCE A. SHUGART, Respondent.
No. 7914
October 30, 1975
541 P.2d 1101
[Rehearing denied November 21, 1975]
Lorin D. Parraguirre, of Las Vegas, for Appellant.
Michael L. Hines, of Las Vegas, for Respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION
Per Curiam:
This appeal from a judgment divorcing the parties challenges the awards of alimony and child support, and the property distribution as well. Since the trial was not reported, the appellant attempted to utilize the provisions of NRAP 10(c). However, the statement of the evidence or proceedings was not submitted to the district court for settlement and approval and, therefore, may not be considered as a part of the record on appeal. United States v. Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Co., 281 F.2d 698, 701 (1960). Consequently, we are wholly unable to evaluate the assigned errors.
Affirmed.
NRAP 10(c): ". . . Thereupon the statement and any objections or proposed amendments shall be submitted to the district court for settlement and approval and as settled and approved shall be included by the clerk of the district court in the record on appeal."