Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rene SIGALA-MARISCAL, aka Rene Sagala, Rene Sigala, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-04-20
Citations: 228 F. App'x 779
Docket Number: No. 06-10608
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Rene SIGALA-MARISCAL, aka Rene Sagala, Rene Sigala, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: O’SCANNLAIN, GRABER, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 228
Pages: 779–780

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Rene SIGALA-MARISCAL, aka Rene Sagala, Rene Sigala, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 06-10608.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 16, 2007.
Filed April 20, 2007.
Robert Don Gifford, II, Esq., USREOffice of the U.S. Attorney, Reno, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Donald C. Gish, Esq., Sparks, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, GRABER, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Rene Sigala-Mariscal appeals from the 41-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for unlawful reentry by a deported alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Sigala-Mariscal contends that the district court erred by failing to consider the disparity between his sentence and sentences imposed upon unlawful reentry defendants in districts with fast-track sentencing programs. This contention is foreclosed. See United States v. Marcial-Santiago, 447 F.3d 715, 718-19 (9th Cir.2006).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.