Case Name: Terry Lee OWENS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Cole JETER, Warden, Federal Medical Center Fort Worth, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-08-16
Citations: 145 F. App'x 459
Docket Number: No. 04-11410
Parties: Terry Lee OWENS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Cole JETER, Warden, Federal Medical Center Fort Worth, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 145
Pages: 459–460

Head Matter:
Terry Lee OWENS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Cole JETER, Warden, Federal Medical Center Fort Worth, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 04-11410.
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Decided Aug. 16, 2005.
Terry Lee Owens, Federal Medical Center Fort Worth, Fort Worth, TX, pro se.
Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Terry Lee Owens, federal prisoner #29251-077, appeals the district court's summary dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, challenging his sentence for distributing 124.9 grams of cocaine base. He argues that under Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), the district court erroneously based his sentence on 2.86 kilograms of cocaine base and his role in the offense. He argues that he qualifies for the savings clause of 28 U.S.C. § 2255 because he is actually innocent of the non-existent offenses of (1) distributing 2.86 kilograms of cocaine base and (2) the two-point enhancement for his role as a manager or supervisor. He asserts that it would be inadequate and ineffective for him to seek permission from this court via a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. See Wesson v. United States Penitentiary, 305 F.3d 343, 347-48 (5th Cir.2002).
Owens's argument is unavailing in light of this court's decision in Padilla v. United States, 416 F.3d 424, 426-427 (5th Cir.2005) (No. 04-50567).
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.