Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. JERRY SIMS, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2005-06-22
Citations: 200 Or. App. 389
Docket Number: 02CR0735FE; A125239
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. JERRY SIMS, Appellant.
Judges: Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Brewer, Chief Judge, and Armstrong, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 200
Pages: 389–390

Head Matter:
Submitted on record and briefs May 23,
sentence vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed June 22,2005
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. JERRY SIMS, Appellant.
02CR0735FE; A125239
114 P3d 542
Peter A. Ozanne, Executive Director, and Dan Maloney, Senior Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Erika L. Hadlock, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Brewer, Chief Judge, and Armstrong, Judge.
PER CURIAM
Brewer, C. J., vice Ceniceros, S. J.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant was convicted of first-degree theft. The trial court imposed a durational departure sentence based on findings of persistent involvement in similar offenses unrelated to the crime and harm or loss significantly greater than typical. On appeal, defendant argues that the sentence is unlawful because it is based on facts not admitted or found by a jury, in violation of Blakely v. Washington, 542 US 296, 124 S Ct 2531, 159 L Ed 2d 403 (2004). The state concedes that, in light of our decisions in State v. Gornick, 196 Or App 397, 102 P3d 734 (2004), and State v. Perez, 196 Or App 364, 102 P3d 705 (2004), rev allowed, 338 Or 488 (2005), defendant is correct. We accept the concession.
Sentence vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.