Case Name: Pearlie RUCKER; Herman Walker; Willie Lee; Barbara Hill, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Harold DAVIS; Oakland Housing Authority, Defendants, and United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Defendant-Appellant; Pearlie Rucker; Herman Walker; Willie Lee; Barbara Hill, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Harold Davis; Oakland Housing Authority, Defendants-Appellants, and United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-06-17
Citations: 293 F.3d 1099
Docket Number: Nos. 98-16322, 98-16542
Parties: Pearlie RUCKER; Herman Walker; Willie Lee; Barbara Hill, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Harold DAVIS; Oakland Housing Authority, Defendants, and United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Defendant-Appellant. Pearlie Rucker; Herman Walker; Willie Lee; Barbara Hill, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Harold Davis; Oakland Housing Authority, Defendants-Appellants, and United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Defendant.
Judges: Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, and SNEED, PREGERSON, REINHARDT, FERNANDEZ, T.G. NELSON, HAWKINS, SILVERMAN, McKEOWN, GOULD, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 293
Pages: 1099-1111–1099-1111

Head Matter:
Pearlie RUCKER; Herman Walker; Willie Lee; Barbara Hill, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Harold DAVIS; Oakland Housing Authority, Defendants, and United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Defendant-Appellant. Pearlie Rucker; Herman Walker; Willie Lee; Barbara Hill, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Harold Davis; Oakland Housing Authority, Defendants-Appellants, and United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Defendant.
Nos. 98-16322, 98-16542.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Filed June 17, 2002.
Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, and SNEED, PREGERSON, REINHARDT, FERNANDEZ, T.G. NELSON, HAWKINS, SILVERMAN, McKEOWN, GOULD, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
The Supreme Court having reversed the en banc court, we remand to the district court to vacate the injunction and enter judgment for Defendants Appellants.
SO ORDERED.