Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Karimah BAILEY, also known as Karimah Montsha Bailey, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-07-01
Citations: 328 F. App'x 429
Docket Number: No. 08-30378
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Karimah BAILEY, also known as Karimah Montsha Bailey, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: PAEZ, TALLMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 328
Pages: 429–430

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Karimah BAILEY, also known as Karimah Montsha Bailey, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 08-30378.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 16, 2009.
Filed July 1, 2009.
Helen J. Brunner, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Matthew Diggs, Esquire, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Lynn Hartfield, Assistant Federal Public Defender, FPDWA-Federal Public Defender’s Office, Seattle, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: PAEZ, TALLMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Karimah Bailey appeals from the 12-month sentence imposed following her guilty-plea conviction for making a false material representation to a federal agency, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Bailey contends that the district court erred by failing to consider her mental health problems in relation to the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), failing to properly address her mental health and mitigation arguments, and placing too much weight on certain factors. We conclude that the district court did not procedurally err and that the sentence is not substantively unreasonable. See Rita v. United States, 551 U.S. 338, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 2468, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007); Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 128 S.Ct. 586, 597, 600-02, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); United States v. Stoterau, 524 F.3d 988, 1001 (9th Cir.2008).
Appellee's motion to supplement the record on appeal is granted. See Fed. R.App. P. 10(e)(2).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.