Case Name: Leroy F. KING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF NORFOLK, VIRGINIA, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-02-29
Citations: 633 F. App'x 841
Docket Number: No. 15-2220
Parties: Leroy F. KING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF NORFOLK, VIRGINIA, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 633
Pages: 841–841

Head Matter:
Leroy F. KING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF NORFOLK, VIRGINIA, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 15-2220.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 25, 2016.
Decided: Feb. 29, 2016.
Leroy F. King, Appellant Pro Se. Melvin Wayne Ringer, City Attorney’s Office, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Leroy F. King appeals the district court's orders dismissing for failure to state a claim King's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and denying King's Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6) motion for relief from judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See King v. City of Norfolk, No. 2:15-cv-00174-RAJ-LRL (E.D.Va. Aug. 24, 2015 & Oct. 2, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not' aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.