Case Name: Jack TAUB, Appellant, v. Patricia Ann TAUB, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-10-05
Citations: 624 So. 2d 852
Docket Number: No. 93-735
Parties: Jack TAUB, Appellant, v. Patricia Ann TAUB, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and COPE, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 624
Pages: 852–853

Head Matter:
Jack TAUB, Appellant, v. Patricia Ann TAUB, Appellee.
No. 93-735.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 5, 1993.
Ruden, Barnett, MeClosky, Smith, Schus-ter & Russell and Nancy W. Gregoire and Gill S. Freeman and Edward A. Licitra, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
Solms & Price and Elizabeth Baker, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and COPE, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We agree with the appellant ex-husband that, under the terms of the parties' property settlement agreement, the partial liquidation of the fund in question did not trigger the appellee ex-wife's right to her distributive share of the entire fund. The order under review, which reflects the trial court's contrary conclusion, is therefore vacated without prejudice to the entry of a judgment reflecting the appellee's entitlement to her share of the proceeds of a liquidation of the entire fund.
Vacated with directions.
. Some $300,000.00 of the approximately $1,000,000.00 fund was "liquidated" in the transaction at issue in this case. Under the agreement, however, the husband was to receive the first $483,000.00 of the proceeds of a complete liquidation, with only the remainder split between the parties.