Case Name: Elwood Wayne MILLS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BERKELEY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; Pete Mitchum, in his official capacity and individually; Ronald Lawrence, in his official capacity and individually; Jerry Wright, in his official capacity and individually; Unknown Officers, of the Berkeley County Sheriff's Department in their official capacity and individually; County of Berkeley, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-04-02
Citations: 91 F. App'x 308
Docket Number: No. 03-2490
Parties: Elwood Wayne MILLS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. BERKELEY COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; Pete Mitchum, in his official capacity and individually; Ronald Lawrence, in his official capacity and individually; Jerry Wright, in his official capacity and individually; Unknown Officers, of the Berkeley County Sheriff's Department in their official capacity and individually; County of Berkeley, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before WIDENER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 91
Pages: 308–308

Head Matter:
Elwood Wayne MILLS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. BERKELEY COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; Pete Mitchum, in his official capacity and individually; Ronald Lawrence, in his official capacity and individually; Jerry Wright, in his official capacity and individually; Unknown Officers, of the Berkeley County Sheriff's Department in their official capacity and individually; County of Berkeley, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 03-2490.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 15, 2004.
Decided April 2, 2004.
Elwood Wayne Mills, Appellant pro se.
James Albert Stuckey, Jr., Robin Lilley Jackson, Stuckey Law Offices, P.A., Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before WIDENER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
Elwood Wayne Mills appeals the district court's order granting the Appellees' motion for summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 1985 (2000) civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Mills v. Berkeley County Sheriff's Dep't, No. CA-01-4494-2-23 (D.S.C. Oct. 20, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED