Case Name: Michael Temmer, Respondent, v. Leopold Zimmermann and Others, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Zimmermann & Forshay, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1922-07
Citations: 202 A.D. 832
Docket Number: 
Parties: Michael Temmer, Respondent, v. Leopold Zimmermann and Others, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Zimmermann & Forshay, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 202
Pages: 832–836

Head Matter:
Michael Temmer, Respondent, v. Leopold Zimmermann and Others, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Zimmermann & Forshay, Appellants.
Banks and banking — principal .and agent — contract to transmit moneys to foreign country — action to recover deposit — damages — reasonable. diligence — war conditions — evidence.
Appeal by the defendants from a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered in the New York county clerk’s office January 13, 1922, upon the verdict of a jury, and also from an order entered January 10, 1922, denying the defendants’ motion for a new trial.
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

Opinion:
No opinion. Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Smith and Greenbaum, JJ.; Smith, J., dissenting.