Case Name: S. C., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. A. C., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1974-05-03
Citations: 128 N.J. Super. 198
Docket Number: 
Parties: S. C., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. A. C., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 128
Pages: 198–198

Head Matter:
S. C., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. A. C., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued April 23, 1974
Decided May 3, 1974.
Before Judges Carton, Loea and Seidman.
Mr. Monroe Ackerman argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Rudd and Ackerman, attorneys; Mr. Charles E. Carlson, Jr. on the brief).
Mr. Everett M. Scherer argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Riker, Danzig, Scherer and Brown, attorneys; Mr. Thomas C. C. Humick on the brief).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment of the Chancery Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the written opinion of Judge Consodine reported at 123 N. J. Super. 566 (Ch. Div. 1973).