Case Name: SHAFER ELECTRIC & CONSTRUCTION, Respondent v. Raymond MANTIA and Donna Mantia, Husband and Wife, Petitioners
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2013-10-29
Citations: 621 Pa. 400
Docket Number: No. 276 WAL 2013
Parties: SHAFER ELECTRIC & CONSTRUCTION, Respondent v. Raymond MANTIA and Donna Mantia, Husband and Wife, Petitioners.
Judges: 
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 621
Pages: 400–400

Head Matter:
78 A.3d 1043
SHAFER ELECTRIC & CONSTRUCTION, Respondent v. Raymond MANTIA and Donna Mantia, Husband and Wife, Petitioners.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Oct. 29, 2013.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 29th day of October, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues are:
(1) Whether the Home Improvement Consumer Protection Act, 73 Pa. Stat. § 517.1-517.18, bars a contractor from recovery under a theory of quantum meruit in the absence of a valid and enforceable home improvement contract under the Act[J
(2) Whether the decisions of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania in Shafer Electric & Construction v. Mantia, [67 A.3d 8] (Pa.Super.Ct.2013), and Durst v. Milroy, 52 A.3d 357, 2012 PA Super 179 (Pa.Super.Ct.2012), conflict with the Home Improvement Consumer Protection Act, 73 Pa. Stat. § 517.7(a) and (g), and should be overturned by this Court[.]