Case Name: The State ex rel. Fuller, Appellant, v. Sutula, Judge, Appellee
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1999-09-01
Citations: 86 Ohio St. 3d 301
Docket Number: No. 99-424
Parties: The State ex rel. Fuller, Appellant, v. Sutula, Judge, Appellee.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 86
Pages: 301–302

Head Matter:
The State ex rel. Fuller, Appellant, v. Sutula, Judge, Appellee.
[Cite as State ex rel. Fuller v. Sutula (1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 301.]
(No. 99-424
Submitted June 22, 1999
Decided September 1, 1999.)
Johnny Ray Fuller, pro se.
William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Randi Marie Ostry, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. Judge Sutula had no duty to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law on Fuller's second petition for postconviction relief. State ex rel. Carroll v. Corrigan (1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 529, 530, 705 N.E.2d 1226, 1227.
Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.