Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Danien COBB, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-05-23
Citations: 191 S.W.3d 711
Docket Number: No. WD 65269
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Danien COBB, Appellant.
Judges: Before THOMAS H. NEWTON, P.J., JAMES M. SMART, and JOSEPH M. ELLIS, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 191
Pages: 711–712

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Danien COBB, Appellant.
No. WD 65269.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
May 23, 2006.
Jeannie M. Willibey, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before THOMAS H. NEWTON, P.J., JAMES M. SMART, and JOSEPH M. ELLIS, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Mr. Danien Cobb appeals his conviction after a bench trial for unlawful use of a weapon, § 571.030. He asserts that a variance exists between the charging document and the State's argument of the proof required.
For the reasons set forth in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).
. All statutory references are to RSMo. (2000), and the Cumulative Supplement (2005), unless otherwise indicated.