Case Name: Junio Cesar FREITAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Dale Baldwin, Plaintiff, v. TRADESMEN INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED; Unified Cleanroom Construction, LLC, Defendants-Appellees; Dale Baldwin, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Junio Cesar Freitas, Plaintiff, v. Tradesmen International, Incorporated; Unified Cleanroom Construction, LLC, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-07-22
Citations: 533 F. App'x 346
Docket Number: Nos. 13-1506, 13-1507
Parties: Junio Cesar FREITAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Dale Baldwin, Plaintiff, v. TRADESMEN INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED; Unified Cleanroom Construction, LLC, Defendants-Appellees. Dale Baldwin, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Junio Cesar Freitas, Plaintiff, v. Tradesmen International, Incorporated; Unified Cleanroom Construction, LLC, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 533
Pages: 346–346

Head Matter:
Junio Cesar FREITAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Dale Baldwin, Plaintiff, v. TRADESMEN INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED; Unified Cleanroom Construction, LLC, Defendants-Appellees. Dale Baldwin, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Junio Cesar Freitas, Plaintiff, v. Tradesmen International, Incorporated; Unified Cleanroom Construction, LLC, Defendants-Appellees.
Nos. 13-1506, 13-1507.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 18, 2013.
Decided: July 22, 2013.
Junio Cesar Freitas; Dale Baldwin, Appellants pro se. Kevin Joseph Dalton, Fisher & Phillips, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina; Kevin Scott Joyner, Kimberly Joyce Lehman, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, PC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Junio Cesar Freitas and Dale Baldwin appeal the district court's order dismissing their civil action. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellants' briefs. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Appellants' informal briefs do not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, they have forfeited appellate review of the court's order. Accordingly, we grant Appellants' motions to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFIRMED