Case Name: Saleem Rafeeq PORTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jeffrey W. FRAZIER, CJM, Superintendent; TED Hull, Major, CJM, Assistant Superintendent, Defendants-Appellees, and Northern Neck Regional Jail, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-08-05
Citations: 104 F. App'x 295
Docket Number: No. 04-6629
Parties: Saleem Rafeeq PORTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jeffrey W. FRAZIER, CJM, Superintendent; TED Hull, Major, CJM, Assistant Superintendent, Defendants-Appellees, and Northern Neck Regional Jail, Defendant.
Judges: Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 104
Pages: 295–296

Head Matter:
Saleem Rafeeq PORTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jeffrey W. FRAZIER, CJM, Superintendent; TED Hull, Major, CJM, Assistant Superintendent, Defendants-Appellees, and Northern Neck Regional Jail, Defendant.
No. 04-6629.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 29, 2004.
Decided: Aug. 5, 2004.
Saleem Porter, Appellant pro se.
Robert A. Dybing, Thompson & McMul-lan, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Saleem Rafeeq Porter appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Porter v. Frazier, No. CA-03-249-AM (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 15, 2004 & entered Mar. 16, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED