Case Name: PADDACK et al, Appellants, v. McDONALD, dba Jess E. McDonald, Jr., Contractor, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1983-07-20
Citations: 64 Or. App. 5
Docket Number: 223493; CA A24973
Parties: PADDACK et al, Appellants, v. McDONALD, dba Jess E. McDonald, Jr., Contractor, Respondent.
Judges: Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Warren and Rossman, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 64
Pages: 5–6

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted June 29,
reversed and remanded July 20, 1983
PADDACK et al, Appellants, v. McDONALD, dba Jess E. McDonald, Jr., Contractor, Respondent.
(223493; CA A24973)
666 P2d 299
David S. Pauli, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief were Thomas J. Barnett and Bailey & Pauli, Portland.
Douglas A. Harrison, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the briefs were William J. Howe, III and Howe & Harris, Portland.
Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Warren and Rossman, Judges.
PER CURIAM.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The parties agree that the issue presented on appeal was decided by the United States Supreme Court on April 27, 1983, in Jim McNeff, Inc. v. Todd, 461 US 260, 103 Sup Ct 1753, 75 L Ed 2d 830 (1983), and that the case must be reversed and remanded for trial.
Reversed and remanded.