Case Name: ARTHUR F. MAHLER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE BOROUGH OF FAIR LAWN AND THE BOROUGH OF FAIR LAWN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1969-12-01
Citations: 55 N.J. 1
Docket Number: 
Parties: ARTHUR F. MAHLER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE BOROUGH OF FAIR LAWN AND THE BOROUGH OF FAIR LAWN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 55
Pages: 1–1

Head Matter:
ARTHUR F. MAHLER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE BOROUGH OF FAIR LAWN AND THE BOROUGH OF FAIR LAWN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Argued November 17, 1969
Decided December 1, 1969.
Mr. James A. Major argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Major & Major, attorneys).
Mr. Robert L. Garibaldi argued the cause for the respondents (Mr. Floyd V. Amoresano, attorney).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Conford in the Appellate Division.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weinteatjb and Justices Jacobs, Pbancts, Pboctob, Hale, Schettino and Hane-MAN' — 7.
For reversal — None.