Case Name: Robert Eugene HAMPTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2001-01-26
Citations: 780 So. 2d 922
Docket Number: No. 1D00-1714
Parties: Robert Eugene HAMPTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: BENTON, PADOVANO, and POLSTON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 780
Pages: 922–922

Head Matter:
Robert Eugene HAMPTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D00-1714.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jan. 26, 2001.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 27, 2001.
Appellant, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and James W. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant challenges an order denying his claims for postconviction relief. We affirm the summary denial of appellant's claims that he is entitled to additional jail credit and that his cumulative incarceration exceeds the statutory maximum. However, appellant also claims that his latest sentence exceeds the guidelines recommendation and that he did not receive the proper amount of prison credit. Because the record does not conclusively refute these allegations, we reverse the summary denial of those two claims. On remand, the trial court is directed to evaluate appellant's prison credit claim in light of Tripp v. State, 622 So.2d 941 (Fla.1993), and Staschak v. State, 718 So.2d 1262 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). Should the trial court again deny the appellant's remaining claims, it must attach portions of the record conclusively demonstrating that the appellant is not entitled to relief. The order denying relief is affirmed in all other respects.
AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED with directions.
BENTON, PADOVANO, and POLSTON, JJ., concur.