Case Name: Doris Thurber, Appellant, v. Kenneth Thurber, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2001-03-05
Citations: 281 A.D.2d 410
Docket Number: 
Parties: Doris Thurber, Appellant, v Kenneth Thurber, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 281
Pages: 410–411

Head Matter:
Doris Thurber, Appellant, v Kenneth Thurber, Respondent.
[721 NYS2d 288]

Opinion:
—In an action to recover damages for unjust enrichment, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Seidell, J.), dated November 12, 1999, which, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the complaint.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint. The appellant failed to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the respondent's retention of certain marital property constituted unjust enrichment (see, Sharp v Kosmalski, 40 NY2d 119).
The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit (see, Matter of Gould v Board of Educ., 81 NY2d 446; Marine Midland Bank-Southern v Thurlow, 53 NY2d 381; Stage Club Corp. v West Realty Co., 212 AD2d 458; Katz v American Tech. Indus., 96 AD2d 932). Friedmann, J. P., Florio, Luciano and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.