Case Name: DANIEL R. PEKERA, ADMINISTRATOR (ESTATE OF CHARLENE WALKER), ET AL. v. DAVID PURPORA ET AL.
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 2004-02-11
Citations: 267 Conn. 919
Docket Number: SC 17133
Parties: DANIEL R. PEKERA, ADMINISTRATOR (ESTATE OF CHARLENE WALKER), ET AL. v. DAVID PURPORA ET AL.
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 267
Pages: 919–919

Head Matter:
DANIEL R. PEKERA, ADMINISTRATOR (ESTATE OF CHARLENE WALKER), ET AL. v. DAVID PURPORA ET AL.
Decided February 11, 2004
The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17133.
John D. Jessep, in support of the petition.
Jeffrey R. Bobbin, in opposition.

Opinion:
The plaintiffs' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 80 Conn. App. 685 (AC 23546), is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in not permitting the plaintiffs to amend their complaint?"