Case Name: Torrent v. Duluth Lumber Co.
Court: United States Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1887-10-15
Citations: 32 F. 229
Docket Number: 
Parties: Torrent v. Duluth Lumber Co.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter
Volume: 32
Pages: 229–230

Head Matter:
Torrent v. Duluth Lumber Co.
(Circuit Court, D. Minnesota.
October 15, 1887.)
Appeal — Rehearing—Misquotation oe Testimony.
A rehearing will not be granted because the court in its opinion misquoted the testimonj', where such misquotation does not change the opinion.
Parker & Burton and P. IT. Gunckel, for complainant.
West & Bond, for defendant.

Opinion:
Nelson, J.
This is a petition for a rehearing and reargument of the case. In the opinion of the court heretofore delivered in this case (30 Fed. Rep. 830) the court (page 835) misquotes the testimony, viz.: "It has to have it on," quoted from Robert Orm's testimony, should read: "They all have to have something to hold the tooth-bar up to the log;" hut such misquotation does not change the opinion of the court.
The petition for rehearing and reargument is denied; final decree ordered; accounting waived; appeal taken and allowed; bond on appeal fixed at $500.