Case Name: Joan HERMANOWSKI, etc., Appellant, v. MORRISON, BROWN ARGIZ AND COMPANY, P.A., et al., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2005-05-11
Citations: 901 So. 2d 390
Docket Number: No. 3D04-328
Parties: Joan HERMANOWSKI, etc., Appellant, v. MORRISON, BROWN ARGIZ AND COMPANY, P.A., et al., Appellee.
Judges: Before GERSTEN, SHEPHERD and SUAREZ, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 901
Pages: 390–391

Head Matter:
Joan HERMANOWSKI, etc., Appellant, v. MORRISON, BROWN ARGIZ AND COMPANY, P.A., et al., Appellee.
No. 3D04-328.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 11, 2005.
Richard L. Rosenbaum (Fort Lauder-dale), and Stephen M. Zukoff, Miami, for appellant.
Burlington, Weil, Schwiep, Kaplan & Blonsky, P.A., Paul J. Schwiep and David J. Zack, Miami; White & Case LLP and Rudolph F. Aragon, for appellee.
Before GERSTEN, SHEPHERD and SUAREZ, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from an order dismissing appellant's Fourth Amended Complaint, which sought to allege claims for accounting malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty against the appellee-accounting firm. We affirm the order of dismissal, but should appellant Joan Hermanowski re-file her complaint, the re-filed complaint will, for statute of limitations purposes, relate back to the originally filed complaint.