Case Name: Freddie Eugene CASEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director VADOC; Sgt. Large, Correctional Sergeant; Messer, C/O; Barton, C/O; Mead, C/O; Gibson, C/O; Young, C/O; Nurse Wood, Institutional Nurse, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-06-22
Citations: 691 F. App'x 793
Docket Number: No. 17-6008
Parties: Freddie Eugene CASEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director VADOC; Sgt. Large, Correctional Sergeant; Messer, C/O; Barton, C/O; Mead, C/O; Gibson, C/O; Young, C/O; Nurse Wood, Institutional Nurse, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 691
Pages: 793–793

Head Matter:
Freddie Eugene CASEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director VADOC; Sgt. Large, Correctional Sergeant; Messer, C/O; Barton, C/O; Mead, C/O; Gibson, C/O; Young, C/O; Nurse Wood, Institutional Nurse, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 17-6008
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 20, 2017
Decided: June 22, 2017
Freddie Eugene Casey, Appellant Pro Se. Jessica Leigh Berdichevsky, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for the Appellees.
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Freddie Eugene Casey appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil rights complaint for failure to state a claim and exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Casey v. Clarke, No. 7:15-cv-00689-JPJ-RSB, 2016 WL 7030973 (W.D. Va. Dec. 2, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED