Case Name: THREE IN ONE OIL CO. v. BOSTON BRASS CO.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1927-12-05
Citations: 23 F.2d 894
Docket Number: No. 1985
Parties: THREE IN ONE OIL CO. v. BOSTON BRASS CO.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 23
Pages: 894–895

Head Matter:
THREE IN ONE OIL CO. v. BOSTON BRASS CO.
Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.
Submitted November 18, 1927.
Decided December 5, 1927.
Petition for Rehearing Denied January 21, 1928.
No. 1985.
J. L. Steuart, of New York City, for appellant.
G. P. Dike, of Boston, Mass., and A. V. Cushman, of Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB and VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justices.

Opinion:
VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.
. This appeal is by the Three in One Oil Company from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents, dismissing the oppositions to the registration of the trade-mark "2 in 1," used on boiler relief valves by appellee Boston Brass Company. In this case, as in the ease of Three in One Oil Company v. Lobl Manufacturing Co., 57 App. D. C. -, 23 F. (2d) 893, this day decided, there is no confusion that can possibly arise from the use of the marks, since the goods on which the marks are used are not of the same descriptive properties. Neither can confusion arise, or any right inure to the opposer, from the registration of the mark, since "2 in 1" is not even a part of appellant's corporate name.
The decision of the Commissioner is affirmed.