Case Name: KNICKERBOCKER TRUST CO. v. ONEONTA, C. & R. S. RY. CO. et al.
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1907-01-09
Citations: 102 N.Y.S. 1139
Docket Number: 
Parties: KNICKERBOCKER TRUST CO. v. ONEONTA, C. & R. S. RY. CO. et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 102
Pages: 1139–1139

Head Matter:
KNICKERBOCKER TRUST CO. v. ONEONTA, C. & R. S. RY. CO. et al.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.
January 9, 1907.)
Action by the Knickerbocker Trust Company, as trustee, against the Oneonta, Cooperstown & Richfield Springs Railway Company.

Opinion:
No opinion. Motion for leave to go to the Court of Appeals granted. and questions certified as follows: First. May a defendant without the service of an answer by himself require a determination of the ultimate rights of himself and a codefendant as between themselves on an answer demanding such determination served on him by such codefendant? Second. Did the Special Term, under the pleadings and proof herein, properly render a judgment determining as between the defendants the ownership of the bonds?