Case Name: Sherman A. THOMPSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer RICHARDSON; Tarace Carson, Officer, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-09-09
Citations: 445 F. App'x 657
Docket Number: No. 11-6124
Parties: Sherman A. THOMPSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer RICHARDSON; Tarace Carson, Officer, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 445
Pages: 657–657

Head Matter:
Sherman A. THOMPSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer RICHARDSON; Tarace Carson, Officer, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 11-6124.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 30, 2011.
Decided: Sept. 9, 2011.
Sherman A. Thompson, Appellant Pro se. Elizabeth F. Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Sherman A. Thompson appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thompson v. Richardson, No. 5:09-ct-03161-BO, 2011 WL 197667 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 19, 2011). We deny Thompson's motion to file an amended complaint and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.