Case Name: THE PANTASOTE COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CITY OF PASSAIC, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1984-06-06
Citations: 7 N.J. Tax 663
Docket Number: 
Parties: THE PANTASOTE COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CITY OF PASSAIC, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Tax Court Reports
Volume: 7
Pages: 663–664

Head Matter:
THE PANTASOTE COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CITY OF PASSAIC, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued May 7,1984
Decided June 6, 1984.
Before Judges BISCHOFF and PETRELLA.
Todd M. Sahner argued the cause for appellant (Hannoch, Weisman, Stern, Besser, Berkowitz & Kinney, attorneys; Carl G. Weisenfeld of counsel; Carl G. Weisenfeld, Paul H. Brownstein and Todd M. Sahner on the brief).
John J. McKniff argued the cause for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff, Pantasote Company, appeals the Tax Court's rulings upholding the Passaic County Board of Taxation's judg ment sustaining the 1979 real property tax assessment on its industrial facility in the City of Passaic and the tax assessor's 1980 and 1981 tax assessments on that property. The Tax Court judge concluded that Pantasote did not establish a value at variance with the assessments and did not overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the assessments and the county board judgment.
We affirm substantially for the reasons given by Judge Hopkins in his written decision reported at 6 N.J.Tax 34 (Tax Ct.1983).