Case Name: STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, Respondent, v. F. C. ROTHER, Appellant
Court: North Dakota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: North Dakota
Decision Date: 1928-04-20
Citations: 56 N.D. 934
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, Respondent, v. F. C. ROTHER, Appellant.
Judges: Nuessle, Ch. J., and Christianson, Birdzell, and Burke, JJ., and Lembke, Dist. J., concur.
Reporter: North Dakota Reports
Volume: 56
Pages: 934–937

Head Matter:
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, Respondent, v. F. C. ROTHER, Appellant.
(219 N. W. 881.)
Opinion filed April 20, 1928.
Rehearing denied June 25, 1928.
Kehoe & Verret, F. T. Gvilibert, and J. G. Adamson, for appellant.
George F. Shafer, Attorney General, L. L. BuHerwiclc, Assistant Attorney General, and Charles H. Houslca, State’s Attorney, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The defendant was convicted of the crime of embezzlement and appeals from the judgment of conviction and from the order denying a motion for a new trial. The indictment was returned by the same grand jury which returned the indictment in State v. Rother, ante, 875, 219 N. W. 574; the same motion was made to set aside the indictment in this case as was made in the other, the same proceedings had thereon and the same ruling made by the trial court.
It follows from what has been said in State v. Bother, supra, that the judgment of conviction must be set aside, and the cause remanded for further proceedings conformable to law.
It is so ordered.
Nuessle, Ch. J., and Christianson, Birdzell, and Burke, JJ., and Lembke, Dist. J., concur.
Burr, J., being disqualified, did not participate; Honorable F. T. Lembke, Judge of the Sixth Judicial District, sitting in his stead.