Case Name: In re: Willie Lewis REESE, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-12-11
Citations: 305 F. App'x 58
Docket Number: No. 08-1938
Parties: In re: Willie Lewis REESE, Petitioner.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 305
Pages: 58–58

Head Matter:
In re: Willie Lewis REESE, Petitioner.
No. 08-1938.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 21, 2008.
Decided: Dec. 11, 2008.
Willie Lewis Reese, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Willie Lewis Reese petitions for a writ of mandamus, seeking orders relieving him of an allegedly illegal sentence and remanding him to the district court for re-sentencing and an evidentiary hearing concerning his counsel's performance. We deny the petition.
Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re: First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir.1988). Further, mandamus is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402, 96 S.Ct. 2119, 48 L.Ed.2d 725 (1976); In re: Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir.1987).
The relief sought by Reese is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in for-ma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.