Case Name: GRAINSKY, Appellant, v. INTERBOROUGH RAPID TRANSIT CO., Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1906-03
Citations: 97 N.Y.S. 1135
Docket Number: 
Parties: GRAINSKY, Appellant, v. INTERBOROUGH RAPID TRANSIT CO., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 97
Pages: 1135–1135

Head Matter:
GRAINSKY, Appellant, v. INTERBOROUGH RAPID TRANSIT CO., Respondent.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
March, 1906.)
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Second District. Action by Louisa Grainsky against the Interborough Rapid Transit Company. From a judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiff appeals. Reversed. Hamburg & Frank, for appellant. Charles A. Gardiner (G. Tarleton Goldthwaite, of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The recent cases of Busch v. Interborough Railroad (decided by the Appellate Division, First Department. January 26, 1906) 96 N. Y. Supp. 747, and Rein v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad, 47 Misc. Rep. 675, 94 N. Y. Supp. 636, are decisive of the question presented upon this appeal and require a reversal of the judgment appealed from. Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.