Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bruce Charles HEGGEN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-11-20
Citations: 81 F. App'x 442
Docket Number: No. 03-7253
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Bruce Charles HEGGEN, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 81
Pages: 442–442

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Bruce Charles HEGGEN, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 03-7253.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 6, 2003.
Decided Nov. 20, 2003.
Bruce Charles Heggen, pro se.
Jennifer Marie Hoefling, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
Bruce Charles Heggen appeals the district court's order denying without prejudice his motion for return of seized property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Heggen, No. CR-01-46 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 6, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED