Case Name: IN RE Pamela B. STUART, Respondent. A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, Bar Registration No. 220236
Court: District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Decision Date: 2017-11-02
Citations: 172 A.3d 393
Docket Number: No. 17-BG-539; DDN: 50-17
Parties: IN RE Pamela B. STUART, Respondent. A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, Bar Registration No. 220236
Judges: BEFORE: Thompson, Beckwith and Easterly, Associate Judges.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 172
Pages: 393–394

Head Matter:
IN RE Pamela B. STUART, Respondent. A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, Bar Registration No. 220236
No. 17-BG-539
DDN: 50-17
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
(FILED November 2, 2017)
BEFORE: Thompson, Beckwith and Easterly, Associate Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
On consideration of the certified order from the Supreme Court of Florida suspending respondent for one, year; this court's June 9, 2017, order suspending respondent pending resolution of this matter and directing her to show cause why reciprocal discipline in the form of a one-year suspension with' a fitness requirement should not be imposed, the response thereto, the statement of Disciplinary Counsel, and respondent's reply; and respondent's D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit filed on July 7, 2017; and it appearing that respondent stipulated to the factual basis underlying her Florida discipline and consented to judgment, it is
ORDERED that Pamela B. .Stuart is hereby suspended from the practice of law for one year nunc pro tunc to July 7, 2017, with reinstatement subject to a showing of fitness. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010); In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate).