Case Name: Harry URVANT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. IMCO POULTRY, INC., as successor in interest to Neuhauser Hatcheries, Inc., as successors in interest to Koppenhofer Brothers Company, a corporation, as successors in interest to Koppenhofer Brothers, a partnership, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1971-03-22
Citations: 440 F.2d 1355
Docket Number: No. 468, Docket 35404
Parties: Harry URVANT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. IMCO POULTRY, INC., as successor in interest to Neuhauser Hatcheries, Inc., as successors in interest to Koppenhofer Brothers Company, a corporation, as successors in interest to Koppenhofer Brothers, a partnership, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 440
Pages: 1355–1355

Head Matter:
Harry URVANT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. IMCO POULTRY, INC., as successor in interest to Neuhauser Hatcheries, Inc., as successors in interest to Koppenhofer Brothers Company, a corporation, as successors in interest to Koppenhofer Brothers, a partnership, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 468, Docket 35404.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued March 8, 1971.
Decided March 22, 1971.
Harry T. Sherman, New York City (Louis I. Newman, New York City, on the brief), for appellant.
Louis C. Lustenberger, Jr., New York City (Timothy D. Roble, Donovan, Leisure, Newton & Irvine, New York City, on the brief), for appellee.
Before HAYS, and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges, and CURTIN, District Judge.
Of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
We affirm the dismissal of the complaint on the opinion of Judge Dooling below, Urvant v. Imco Poultry, Inc., 325 F.Supp. 677 (E.D.N.Y., filed January 2, 1970).