Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jacques NISCHWITZ, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-06-28
Citations: 165 S.W.3d 528
Docket Number: No. ED 84880
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jacques NISCHWITZ, Appellant.
Judges: Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 165
Pages: 528–529

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jacques NISCHWITZ, Appellant.
No. ED 84880.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
June 28, 2005.
N. Scott Rosenblum, Clayton, MO, for appellant.
Deborah Daniels, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Jacques Nischwitz ("Defendant") appeals from the trial court's judgment entered in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County upon his conviction for violating two orders of protection. Defendant contends that the trial court erred in improperly joining the charges relating to the two orders of protection into a single indictment and denying Defendant's Motion to Sever.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and no error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).