Case Name: Ryan McCARTHY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2014-08-26
Citations: 145 So. 3d 222
Docket Number: No. 1D13-2387
Parties: Ryan McCARTHY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: WOLF, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 145
Pages: 222–222

Head Matter:
Ryan McCARTHY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D13-2387.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Aug. 26, 2014.
Michael Ufferman of Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General; Samuel B. Steinberg and Jay Kubica, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Ryan McCarthy, was convicted and sentenced for the unlawful use of a computer service, traveling to meet a minor, and transmission of material harmful to minors by electronic device or equipment. Appellant raises three issues on appeal. We affirm as to all issues and briefly discuss one.
Appellant asserts that his convictions for the unlawful use of a computer service and traveling to meeting a minor violate double jeopardy because they arose out of the same criminal episode. We have previously rejected this argument. See Elsberry v. State, 130 So.3d 798, 798 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014); State v. Murphy, 124 So.3d 323, 330-31 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013). As we did in Elsberry, we certify conflict with the decision of Hartley v. State, 129 So.3d 486 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014).
AFFIRMED.
WOLF, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.