Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Konstantin Rudenko, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1997-06-16
Citations: 240 A.D.2d 598
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Konstantin Rudenko, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 240
Pages: 598–599

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Konstantin Rudenko, Appellant.
[659 NYS2d 987]

Opinion:
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lipp, J.), rendered August 30, 1995, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).
Further, there is no merit to the defendant's contention that the court erroneously failed to impose appropriate sanctions upon the People for a Rosario violation (see, People v Rosario, 9 NY2d 286, cert denied 386 US 866). The sanctions sought by the defendant were more drastic than the situation warranted (see, People v Joseph, 86 NY2d 565, 570; People v Martinez, 71 NY2d 937, 940).
The defendant's remaining contentions lack merit or are unpreserved for appellate review. Miller, J. P., Copertino, Sullivan and Altman, JJ., concur.