Case Name: JOHN BEAL, INC., Respondent, v. Carmen HILL, Defendant, and Jon E. Fuhrer, Co., et al., Appellants
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2010-12-07
Citations: 326 S.W.3d 827
Docket Number: No. ED 94660
Parties: JOHN BEAL, INC., Respondent, v. Carmen HILL, Defendant, and Jon E. Fuhrer, Co., et al., Appellants.
Judges: Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 326
Pages: 827–828

Head Matter:
JOHN BEAL, INC., Respondent, v. Carmen HILL, Defendant, and Jon E. Fuhrer, Co., et al., Appellants.
No. ED 94660.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Dec. 7, 2010.
Randall Gusdorf, Saint Louis, MO, for Respondent.
David M. Hocking, Esq., Saint Louis, MO, for Defendants/Appellants.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Jon E. Führer, Co., Alternative Funding, LLC, Danyielle Burks, and Sean Bu-channon appeal the trial court's judgment in favor of John Beal, Inc. ("Beal") on his petition to enforce a mechanic's liens. We find that the trial court did not err in its judgment in favor of Beal.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).