Case Name: Eugene McALLISTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1991-09-17
Citations: 815 S.W.2d 148
Docket Number: No. 59485
Parties: Eugene McALLISTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 815
Pages: 148–148

Head Matter:
Eugene McALLISTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 59485.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Sept. 17, 1991.
William J. Swift, Columbia, for appellant.
William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Eugene McAllister, appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs and arguments of the parties, the transcript and the legal file, and can find no error on the part of the motion court. In addition, we find that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. Appellant's appeal is, therefore, affirmed pursuant to rule 84.16(b). The parties have been provided with a memorandum, solely for their own information, setting out the reasons for our decision.