Case Name: Derelle PINNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-09-12
Citations: 31 S.W.3d 123
Docket Number: No. ED 77099
Parties: Derelle PINNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER, III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 31
Pages: 123–124

Head Matter:
Derelle PINNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 77099.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Sept. 12, 2000.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 30, 2000.
Application for Transfer Denied Dec. 5, 2000.
Mary S. Choi, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Adriane D. Crouse, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER, III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Derelle Pinner ("Movant") appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion to vacate, set aside or correct his judgment and sentence without an eviden-tiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would be of no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).