Case Name: Martha TROUT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GARMIN INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant-Appellee, and TomTom, Inc., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-03-24
Citations: 413 F. App'x 288
Docket Number: No. 2010-1488
Parties: Martha TROUT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GARMIN INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant-Appellee, and TomTom, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 413
Pages: 288–288

Head Matter:
Martha TROUT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GARMIN INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant-Appellee, and TomTom, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 2010-1488.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
March 24, 2011.
Raymond P. Niro, Niro, Scavone, Haller & Niro, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellant SP Technologies, LLC.
Adam P. Seitz, Shook, Hardy & Bacon, LLP, Kansas City, MO, for DefendantAppellee Garmin International, Inc.
James H. Wallace Jr., Wiley Rein LLP, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee TomTom, Inc.

Opinion:
ON MOTION
ORDER
Martha Trout, acting pro se, moves to be substituted for appellant SP Technologies, LLC. We treat this as a motion to reform the caption of the appeal. Trout also moves for an extension of time to file a brief. Both motions are unopposed.
The district court granted summary judgment of invalidity of the patent in suit, U.S. Patent No. 6,784,873 ('873 patent) and entered judgment. SP Technologies appealed. Subsequently, SP Technologies filed a motion with the distinct court pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(c) to substitute Trout for SP Technologies on the basis of an assignment of the '873 patent from SP Technologies to Trout, and for leave for SP Technologies' counsel to withdraw from the case beyond the still-pending "issues relating to the bills of cost." Defendant TomTom, Inc. opposed both the substitution and the withdrawal. The district court granted the motion to substitute Trout for SP Technologies, but denied leave for SP Technologies' counsel to withdraw. The district court action was recaptioned to add Trout and remove SP Technologies as plaintiff.
Accordingly,
It Is Ordered That:
(1) Trout's motion to reform the caption is granted. The revised official caption is reflected above.
(2) Trout's initial brief is due within 60 days from the date of filing of this order.