Case Name: PRITCHARD et al. v. CHILDS, trustee
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1934-09-14
Citations: 179 Ga. 387
Docket Number: No. 10077
Parties: PRITCHARD et al. v. CHILDS, trustee.
Judges: All the Justices concur, except Bussell, C. J., who dissents, and Hutcheson, J., disqualified.
Reporter: Georgia Reports
Volume: 179
Pages: 387–389

Head Matter:
PRITCHARD et al. v. CHILDS, trustee.
No. 10077.
September 14, 1934.
Rehearing denied September 24, 1934.
Augustine Sams, J ames C. Davis, Craighead & Craighead, Dwyer & Dwyer, Dillon, Calhoun & Dillon, and M. H. Kilpaimck, for plaintiffs in error.
Branch & Howard, contra.

Opinion:
Atkinson, J.
J. D. Childs, as trustee in bankruptcy for Paramount Dairy Company, instituted an action against C. E. Pritchard, E. B. Pritchard, S. W. Allen, E. J. Hudson, Southland Dairy Cor poration, and Southern Grocery Stores Inc., seeking to recover $10,000 as the value of the capital stock of the Paramount Dairy Company, a corporation, which, as the petition as amended alleged, the defendants issued and caused to be issued without any consideration being paid to or received by the corporation; also to recover $20,000 as the value of assets and funds of the corporation, alleged to have been fraudulently converted by the defendants to their use and benefit. The defendants interposed demurrers which the court overruled. All of the defendants, except the Southern Grocery Stores Inc., filed exceptions pendente lite. The Southern Grocery Stores Inc. filed a direct bill of exceptions, on which the judgment of the trial court was reversed. Southern Grocery Stores Inc. v. Childs, 174 Ga. 888 (164 S. E. 766), where the allegations of the petition as amended are sufficiently stated. Subsequently the case proceeded to trial against the remaining defendants, and a verdict for the plaintiff was returned. The defendants made motions for a new trial, which by agreement were consolidated. A new trial was refused, and the movants excepted, assigning error on the judgment refusing a new trial and on the rulings excepted to pendente lite.
There being no allegation that the defendants were subscribers to the capital stock in the Paramount Dairy Company, and no allegation of any contract to pay the amount thereof, no cause of action was alleged for recovery of the par value of the capital stock.
Judgment reversed.
All the Justices concur, except Bussell, C. J., who dissents, and Hutcheson, J., disqualified.