Case Name: Mary M. Schultz et al., respondents, v. Louis Pollock et. al., appellants
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1929-02-04
Citations: 104 N.J. Eq. 205
Docket Number: 
Parties: Mary M. Schultz et al., respondents, v. Louis Pollock et. al., appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 104
Pages: 205–205

Head Matter:
Mary M. Schultz et al., respondents, v. Louis Pollock et. al., appellants.
[Decided February 4th, 1929.]
Mr. Michael J. Tansey, for the respondents.
Mr. J. Harry Levin, for the appellants.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will he affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the' court below by YiceChancellor Church, and reported in 103 N. J. Eq. 157.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Tkeetchakb, PakKEK, KaLISCH, KatZEETBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, Yah Buskibk, McGleetetoet, Kays, Heteield, Deak, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.