Case Name: H. L. MOORMAN, Appellant v. A. Edward HARNICK, doing business as Edward's Art Galleries, Appellee
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1954-07-09
Citations: 73 So. 2d 676
Docket Number: 
Parties: H. L. MOORMAN, Appellant v. A. Edward HARNICK, doing business as Edward’s Art Galleries, Appellee.
Judges: ROBERTS, C. J., and TERRELL, THOMAS, HOBSON, and DREW, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 73
Pages: 676–677

Head Matter:
H. L. MOORMAN, Appellant v. A. Edward HARNICK, doing business as Edward’s Art Galleries, Appellee.
Supreme Court of Florida. En Banc.
July 9, 1954.
Rehearing Denied July 30, 1954.
George B. Carter, Orlando, Murray W. Overstreet and Ellis F. Davis, Kissimmee, for appellant
Thacker & Thacker, Kissimmee, and Richard W. Hobbs, Hot Springs, Ark., for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The conflict in the evidence and the inferences deducible therefrom in this case were such as to require that the question of liability be submitted to a jury, and it was therefore error to direct a verdict in plaintiff's favor.
Accordingly, the judgment appealed from should be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.
It is so ordered.
ROBERTS, C. J., and TERRELL, THOMAS, HOBSON, and DREW, JJ., concur.
SEBRING and MATHEWS, JJ., dissent