Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael CROMWELL, a/k/a Mike Tyson, a/k/a Mikey, a/k/a Charlie, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-02-02
Citations: 710 F. App'x 163
Docket Number: No. 17-7389
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael CROMWELL, a/k/a Mike Tyson, a/k/a Mikey, a/k/a Charlie, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 710
Pages: 163–164

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael CROMWELL, a/k/a Mike Tyson, a/k/a Mikey, a/k/a Charlie, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 17-7389
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: January 30, 2018
Decided: February 2, 2018
Michael Cromwell, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Evan DePadilla, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael Cromwell appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Cromwell, No. 2:11-cr-00009-AWA-DEM-1 (E.D. Va. Sept. 15, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Because Cromwell does not challenge on appeal the district court's disposition of his claim based on Amendment 750 to the Sentencing Guidelines, he has forfeited appellate review of that issue, See 4th Cir. R, 34(b).