Case Name: Frank Koewing, Appellant, v. Ernst Thalmann and Richard Limburger, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Ladenburg, Thalmann & Co., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1910-06
Citations: 139 A.D. 893
Docket Number: 
Parties: Frank Koewing, Appellant, v. Ernst Thalmann and Richard Limburger, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Ladenburg, Thalmann & Co., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 139
Pages: 893–894

Head Matter:
Frank Koewing, Appellant, v. Ernst Thalmann and Richard Limburger, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Ladenburg, Thalmann & Co., Respondents.

Opinion:
Appeal from a judgment entered on the 24th.day of January, 1910, dismissing the complaint at the close of the whole case, after a trial at Trial Term.
Per Curiam:
The complaint having been dismissed at the close of the testimony, the action of the court was in the nature of a nonsuit and, therefore, not upon the merits. The judgment must, therefore, be modified by striking out the words "on the merits," and as so modified affirmed, with costs to the respondents. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Clarke, Scott and Miller, JJ. Judgment modified by striking out the-words "on the merits,'', and as modified affirmed,' with costs to respondents.