Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Timmy GOINS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-06-18
Citations: 37 F. App'x 647
Docket Number: No. 02-4075
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Timmy GOINS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 37
Pages: 647–647

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Timmy GOINS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-4075.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted June 13, 2002.
Decided June 18, 2002.
Matthew W. Greene, Smith & Greene, P.L.L.C., Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellant. John L. Brownlee, United States Attorney, S. Randall Ramseyer, Assistant United States Attorney, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Timmy Goins appeals the magistrate judge's order denying his motion for modification of his sentence to permit his sentences to run concurrently. We have reviewed the record, the magistrate judge's order, and the district court's order affirming the magistrate judge, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge and the district court. See United States v. Goins, Nos. M-01-14-2; M-01-15-2; M-01- 16-2; M-01-43-2; M-01-44-2; CR-02- 5 (W.D.Va. Dec. 18 & 26, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.