Case Name: Cincinnati Bar Association v. Chacksfield
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1977-06-29
Citations: 50 Ohio St. 2d 305
Docket Number: D. D. No. 77-1
Parties: Cincinnati Bar Association v. Chacksfield.
Judges: O’Neill,, C. J., Herbert, Celebrezze, W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Second Series
Volume: 50
Pages: 305–306

Head Matter:
Cincinnati Bar Association v. Chacksfield.
(D. D. No. 77-1
Decided June 29, 1977.)
Mr. John J. Getgey, Jr., Mr. Robert M. Bratton, Jr., Mr. Robert L. Davis and Mr. Clement J. DeMichelis, for relator.
Mr. Marvm Kleinman and Mr. Nelson Lancione, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Cwiam.
Upon an examination of the record of this action, we find that respondent's actions were in violation of the following canons of the Code of Professional Responsibility as charged:
Canon 1. "A Lawyer Should Assist in Maintaining the Integrity and Competence of the Legal Profession."
Canon 7. "A Lawyer Should Represent a Client Zealously Within the Bounds of the Law."
Canon 9. "A Lawyer Should Avoid Even the Appearance of Professional Impropriety."
Therefore, we accept the board's recommendation, and the respondent is indefimtely suspended from the practice of law.
Judgment accordingly.
O'Neill,, C. J., Herbert, Celebrezze, W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur.