Case Name: Philip Grossman, Respondent, v. Aaron J. Schindel et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Domestic Mills, Appellants. Aaron Schindel et al., Plaintiffs, v. Philip Grossman, Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1948-10-18
Citations: 274 A.D. 882
Docket Number: 
Parties: Philip Grossman, Respondent, v. Aaron J. Schindel et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Domestic Mills, Appellants. Aaron Schindel et al., Plaintiffs, v. Philip Grossman, Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 274
Pages: 882–882

Head Matter:
Philip Grossman, Respondent, v. Aaron J. Schindel et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Domestic Mills, Appellants. Aaron Schindel et al., Plaintiffs, v. Philip Grossman, Defendant.

Opinion:
Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondent, with leave to the defendants-appellants to move, within twenty days, at Special Term for reargument upon a showing that they have affirmatively complied with the provisions of the Office of Price Administration regulations with respect to establishing a maximum price as required by the decision in International Spangles Corp. v. Marrow Mfg. Corp. (294 N. Y. 295). No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.