Case Name: Berrian v. Sanford, appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1874-10
Citations: 4 Thomp. & Cook 655
Docket Number: 
Parties: Berrian v. Sanford, appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Thompson & Cook's Supreme Court Reports
Volume: 4
Pages: 655–656

Head Matter:
Berrian v. Sanford, appellant.
Eidenee—parol to show contents of uniting — Reference—receiving testimony subject to objection.
A witness testified to the existence of a memorandum. Held, that oral testimony was not admissible to show the contents of such memorandum.
The reservation by a referee of the question of admissibility of testimony objected to, and receiving the testimony is probably not error, but the referee ought, before closing the case, to make his ruling and advise the parties. The practice of reserving the question disapproved in Sharpe v. Freeman, 45 N. Y. 803; and condemned in Olussman v. Merkel, 3 Bosw. 403.
Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee. The action was brought by Charles E. Berrian against Josephine E. Sanford to recover the value of a horse which plaintiff claimed defendant had agreed to deliver to him.
Whitehead H. Van WycTc, for appellant.'
Hatch & Beneville, for respondents.

Opinion:
Davis, P: J.
The head-note states fully the only material points passed upon in the opinion.
New trial ordered.