Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Cruz DIAZ-CAMARILLO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-03-23
Citations: 91 F. App'x 347
Docket Number: No. 03-10783
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Cruz DIAZ-CAMARILLO, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 91
Pages: 347–347

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Cruz DIAZ-CAMARILLO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 03-10783
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 23, 2004.
Nancy E. Larson, Assistant US Attorney, Bret E. Helmer, US Attorney’s Office, Fort Worth, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Jose Cruz Diaz-Camarillo, Federal Correctional Institution, Oakdale, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Court-appointed counsel for Jose Cruz Diaz-Camarillo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). DiazCamarillo has filed a response in which he raises several claims, including claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The record has not been adequately developed for us to consider in this direct appeal the ineffective assistance claims raised by Diaz-Camarillo. See United States v. Higdon, 832 F.2d 312, 313-14 (5th Cir.1987); see United States v. Price, 95 F.3d 364, 369 (5th Cir.1996).
Our independent review of counsel's brief, Diaz-Camarillo's response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.