Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Anthony IVY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1994-05-03
Citations: 874 S.W.2d 563
Docket Number: No. 58271
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Anthony IVY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 874
Pages: 563–563

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Anthony IVY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 58271.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
May 3, 1994.
John A. Klosterman, St. Louis, for defendant-appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Cheryl A. Caponegro, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff-respondent.
Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant, Anthony Ivy, appeals from his judgment of convictions.
This is the second appeal in this case. In the previous appeal, we remanded the case for a hearing to determine whether the state was guilty of racial discrimination in its use of its peremptory challenges during the jury selection process under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). The trial court was also directed to correct a clerical mistake in the judgment. In all other respects, the judgment of convictions were affirmed. The trial court's dismissal of defendant's Rule 29.15 motion was also affirmed. State v. Ivy, 851 S.W.2d 71 (Mo.App.E.D.1993).
We have reviewed the record in this appeal. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment of convictions are affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).