Case Name: Federico Ceballos DOMINGUEZ, Appellant, v. Robert I. MOSELEY, Warden, U. S. Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1970-10-05
Citations: 431 F.2d 1376
Docket Number: No. 401-70
Parties: Federico Ceballos DOMINGUEZ, Appellant, v. Robert I. MOSELEY, Warden, U. S. Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 431
Pages: 1376–1376

Head Matter:
Federico Ceballos DOMINGUEZ, Appellant, v. Robert I. MOSELEY, Warden, U. S. Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas, Appellee.
No. 401-70.
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
Oct. 5, 1970.
Federico Ceballos Dominguez, pro se.
Before LEWIS, Chief Judge, PICKETT, Circuit Judge, and KERR, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Dominguez was notified that the court was considering summary affirmance and afforded an opportunity to oppose such disposition by filing a memorandum addressing the merits of the cause. He has submitted a brief, filed-at the time of docketing, and a supplemental pleading since then. Examination of the file and records in this case prompts the conclusion that the questions presented are so unsubstantial as not to warrant further argument.
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons stated in its Memorandum and Order, 317 F.Supp. 10 (D.Kan.1970). See also Dearman v. Woodson, 429 F.2d 1288 (10th Cir., 1970).