Case Name: Anthony Jesus JOHNSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Warden Leroy CARTLEDGE, Respondent-Appellee, and Atty Gen Alan Wilson; The State, Respondents
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-09-27
Citations: 540 F. App'x 190
Docket Number: No. 13-6931
Parties: Anthony Jesus JOHNSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Warden Leroy CARTLEDGE, Respondent-Appellee, and Atty Gen Alan Wilson; The State, Respondents.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 540
Pages: 190–191

Head Matter:
Anthony Jesus JOHNSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Warden Leroy CARTLEDGE, Respondent-Appellee, and Atty Gen Alan Wilson; The State, Respondents.
No. 13-6931.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 24, 2013.
Decided: Sept. 27, 2013.
Anthony Jesus Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, James Anthony Mabry, Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Jesus Johnson seeks to appeal the district court's order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying the respondents' motion for summary judgment in Johnson's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Johnson seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.