Case Name: Jason R. GARDNER, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-01-29
Citations: 70 S.W.3d 559
Docket Number: No. ED 79484
Parties: Jason R. GARDNER, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 70
Pages: 559–560

Head Matter:
Jason R. GARDNER, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 79484.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Jan. 29, 2002.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 13, 2002.
Application for Transfer Denied April 23, 2002.
Michael J. Gorla, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Linda Lemke, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant Jason Gardner appeals from a judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief following an evi-dentiary hearing.
The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).