Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James Lovejoy, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1984-11-19
Citations: 105 A.D.2d 807
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Lovejoy, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 105
Pages: 807–808

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Lovejoy, Appellant.

Opinion:
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.), rendered July 14, 1983, convicting him of two counts of robbery in the first degree, two counts of robbery in the second degree, kidnapping in the second degree, assault in the second degree and grand larceny in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Judgment affirmed.
Although the prosecutor should not have elicited hearsay testimony regarding an uncharged crime (the breaking of a windshield), prompt curative instructions alleviated any possibility of prejudice (People v Santiago, 52 NY2d 865). In addition thereto, we note that defense counsel subsequently elicited testimony regarding the uncharged crime.
Defendant's other contentions have been considered and have been found to be without merit. Mollen, P. J., Titone, Thompson and Weinstein, JJ., concur.