Case Name: Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. Tatum
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1917-12-12
Citations: 21 Ga. App. 388
Docket Number: 8657
Parties: Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. Tatum.
Judges: Jenkins and Luke, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 21
Pages: 388–389

Head Matter:
8657.
Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. Tatum.

Opinion:
Wade, O. J.
1. The various exceptions to the charge of the court, on account of alleged inaccuracies in presenting the issues raised by the evidence, are without substantial merit; nor is a reversal required by any of the remaining grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial.
Decided December 12, 1917.
Action for damages; from Dade superior court — Judge'Fite. November 27, 1916.
Payne & Hale, for plaintiff in error. B. T. Brock, contra.
2. There was no demurrer, and this court can not.say as a matter of law that the alleged; damages were too remote to authorize a recovery, or that the evidence adduced at the trial did not reasonably support the deduction, under the ruling in Stoner v. Patten, 132 Ga. 178, 63 S. E. 897) ; that said damages resulted directly from the acts and conduct of the defendant; 'and the trial judge having approved the verdict, his judgment in overruling the motion for a new trial is
Affirmed.
Jenkins and Luke, JJ., concur.