Case Name: MERCANTILE BANK, N.A., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Elbert A. WALTON, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1991-04-16
Citations: 807 S.W.2d 203
Docket Number: No. 58311
Parties: MERCANTILE BANK, N.A., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Elbert A. WALTON, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 807
Pages: 203–203

Head Matter:
MERCANTILE BANK, N.A., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Elbert A. WALTON, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 58311.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
April 16, 1991.
Elbert A. Walton, Jr., St. Louis, for defendant-appellant.
Kathy Vann Quinerly, Joan Kay McMul-len, St. Louis, for plaintiff-respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Defendant, Elbert A. Walton, Jr., appeals from the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff, Mercantile Bank, N.A., f/k/a Mercantile Trust Company, N.A., on an action for the balance due on a promissory note. We have reviewed the record on appeal and find that there was no genuine issue as to any material fact and that plaintiff-bank was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Rule 74.04(c). An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).