Case Name: Nathaniel L. ALLEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Honorable Michael T. SEILER, Official Capacity; Greg Abbott, Attorney General of Texas, Official Capacity; Allison Taylor, Executive Director, Office of Violent Sex Offender Management, Official Capacity; Diana Lemon, Office of Violent Sex Offender Management, Case Manager, El Paso, Texas, Official Capacity; Clemmy Washington, Office of Violent Sex Offender Management, Case Manager, Fort Worth, Texas, Official Capacity, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-07-12
Citations: 535 F. App'x 423
Docket Number: No. 13-10243
Parties: Nathaniel L. ALLEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Honorable Michael T. SEILER, Official Capacity; Greg Abbott, Attorney General of Texas, Official Capacity; Allison Taylor, Executive Director, Office of Violent Sex Offender Management, Official Capacity; Diana Lemon, Office of Violent Sex Offender Management, Case Manager, El Paso, Texas, Official Capacity; Clemmy Washington, Office of Violent Sex Offender Management, Case Manager, Fort Worth, Texas, Official Capacity, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before SMITH, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 535
Pages: 423–424

Head Matter:
Nathaniel L. ALLEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Honorable Michael T. SEILER, Official Capacity; Greg Abbott, Attorney General of Texas, Official Capacity; Allison Taylor, Executive Director, Office of Violent Sex Offender Management, Official Capacity; Diana Lemon, Office of Violent Sex Offender Management, Case Manager, El Paso, Texas, Official Capacity; Clemmy Washington, Office of Violent Sex Offender Management, Case Manager, Fort Worth, Texas, Official Capacity, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 13-10243
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
July 12, 2013.
Nathaniel L. Allen, Fort Worth, TX, pro se.
Before SMITH, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Nathaniel Allen, confined under an order of civil commitment as a violent sex offender, sued various state officials and employees for declaratory and injunctive relief. On January 30, 2013, the district court issued a thorough and persuasive seventeen-page opinion and order dismissing all claims.
The district court carefully addressed all of Allen's assertions and explained why they have no merit. The judgment is AFFIRMED, essentially for the reasons given by the district court. Allen's motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.