Case Name: Samuel CHANDLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-05-18
Citations: 543 So. 2d 428
Docket Number: No. 88-2009
Parties: Samuel CHANDLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: COWART and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 543
Pages: 428–428

Head Matter:
Samuel CHANDLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 88-2009.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
May 18, 1989.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Kenneth Witts, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Samuel Chandler, Starke, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Dee R. Ball, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
DAUKSCH, Judge.
This is an appeal from a conviction in a drug case. Appellant's attorney filed an Anders brief and appellant then filed a pro se brief. Neither brief brings up anything to warrant reversal but the pro se brief does raise a competency of counsel issue which must first be directed to the trial judge under Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
AFFIRMED.
COWART and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.
. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).