Case Name: The State ex rel. Yonkings, Appellant, v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al., Appellees
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1994-04-20
Citations: 69 Ohio St. 3d 70
Docket Number: No. 93-2552
Parties: The State ex rel. Yonkings, Appellant, v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al., Appellees.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 69
Pages: 70–70

Head Matter:
The State ex rel. Yonkings, Appellant, v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al., Appellees.
[Cite as State ex rel. Yonkings v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr. (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 70.]
(No. 93-2552
Submitted March 1, 1994
Decided April 20, 1994.)
Charles B. Yonkings, pro se.
Lee I. Fisher, Attorney General, and Joshua T. Cox, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed for the reason stated in the court's opinion, i.e., declaratory judgment provides an adequate remedy to appellant and its availability was thus an appropriate basis to deny the writ. State ex rel. Citizens for Fair Taxation v. Lucas Cty. Bd. of Commrs. (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 749, 752, 591 N.E.2d 691, 693; State ex rel. Fenske v. McGovern (1984), 11 Ohio St.3d 129, 11 OBR 426, 464 N.E.2d 525, paragraph two of the syllabus; R.C. 2731.05.
Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.