Case Name: DAVID WOLFF, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. MAUD M. MEYER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1908-06-15
Citations: 76 N.J.L. 574
Docket Number: 
Parties: DAVID WOLFF, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. MAUD M. MEYER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 76
Pages: 574–575

Head Matter:
DAVID WOLFF, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. MAUD M. MEYER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Argued March 5, 1908
Decided June 15, 1908.
On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 46 Vroom 181.
Por the plaintiff in error, John A. Kiernan and Glarence D. Meyer.
Por the defendant in error, Sanmel Koestler.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Swayze in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Bogeet, Yredenburgh, Green, Gray, Dill, J.J. 10.
For reversal—Yooehees, Yeoom, J.J. 2.