Case Name: Paola Andrea RESTREPO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2012-04-13
Citations: 86 So. 3d 538
Docket Number: No. 2D11-4623
Parties: Paola Andrea RESTREPO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: CASANUEVA, LaROSE, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 86
Pages: 538–538

Head Matter:
Paola Andrea RESTREPO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D11-4623.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
April 13, 2012.
Rexford G. Darrow, II, of Faett & Darrow, Naples, for Appellant.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Paola Andrea Restrepo appeals the summary denial of her motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, which the post-conviction court denied as untimely. We affirm. See Barrios-Cruz v. State, 63 So.3d 868 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011). As in Barrios-Cruz, 63 So.3d at 870, we hold that Padilla v. Kentucky, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), does not apply retroactively in postconviction proceedings, and we certify to the Florida Supreme Court the following question of great public importance pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(a)(2)(A)(v):
SHOULD THE RULING IN Padilla v. Kentucky, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), BE APPLIED RETROACTIVELY IN POSTCONVICTION PROCEEDINGS?
Affirmed.
CASANUEVA, LaROSE, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.