Case Name: John B. KIMBLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Kay J. Kimble, Plaintiff, v. MIDFIRST BANK; Aaron R. Caruso, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-02-28
Citations: 56 F. App'x 204
Docket Number: No. 03-1037
Parties: John B. KIMBLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Kay J. Kimble, Plaintiff, v. MIDFIRST BANK; Aaron R. Caruso, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 56
Pages: 204–205

Head Matter:
John B. KIMBLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Kay J. Kimble, Plaintiff, v. MIDFIRST BANK; Aaron R. Caruso, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 03-1037.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 20, 2003.
Decided Feb. 28, 2003.
John B. Kimble, Appellant Pro Se.
Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
John B. Kimble appeals the district court's orders dismissing his petition for injunctive relief for lack of diversity juris diction and denying his motion filed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Kimble v. Midfirst Bank, No. CA-02-3869-PJM (D. Md. Nov. 27, 2002; filed Dec. 20, 2002, & entered Dec. 23, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.