Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Roberto Cruz, Also Known as Jose Rodriguez, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1992-12-17
Citations: 81 N.Y.2d 738
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Roberto Cruz, Also Known as Jose Rodriguez, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 81
Pages: 738–739

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Roberto Cruz, Also Known as Jose Rodriguez, Appellant.
Argued November 20, 1992;
decided December 17, 1992
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
William B. Carney, New York City, and Philip L. Weinstein, for appellant.
Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney of Bronx County, Bronx (Daniel S. Ratner and Susan L. Valle of counsel), for respondent, and for New York State District Attorneys Association, amicus curiae.
Anthony J. Ferrara, New York City, for Association of the Bar of the City of New York, amicus curiae.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and a new trial ordered.
The trial court improperly conducted a Sandoval hearing (People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371) in defendant's absence, requiring a new trial (see, People v Dokes, 79 NY2d 656; People v Gebrosky, 80 NY2d 995). It is therefore unnecessary to consider defendant's remaining contention.
Acting Chief Judge Simons and Judges Kaye, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur in memorandum; Judge Smith taking no part.
Order reversed, etc.