Case Name: Jesse KLUMPP, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Frances SANCEGRAW, Phillip Nixon and Gloria Gourley, Defendants/Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1996-08-27
Citations: 927 S.W.2d 575
Docket Number: No. 70240
Parties: Jesse KLUMPP, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Frances SANCEGRAW, Phillip Nixon and Gloria Gourley, Defendants/Respondents.
Judges: Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 927
Pages: 575–575

Head Matter:
Jesse KLUMPP, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Frances SANCEGRAW, Phillip Nixon and Gloria Gourley, Defendants/Respondents.
No. 70240.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Aug. 27, 1996.
Jesse Klumpp, Mineral Point, pro se.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., John R. Munich, Deputy Atty. Gen., Gretehen E. Rowan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for defendants/respondents.
Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff, pro se, appeals the dismissal of his petition for declaratory judgment so "that he can file and maintain a suit in the United States District Court." Presumably, plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment stating that he has no remedies under Missouri law for deprivation of property, so that he can pursue a claim in federal court under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The trial court dismissed his petition. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).