Case Name: Richard McAVOY v. Andrew P. RUSH and Edna M. Rush
Court: Maine Supreme Judicial Court
Jurisdiction: Maine
Decision Date: 1969-01-07
Citations: 248 A.2d 764
Docket Number: 
Parties: Richard McAVOY v. Andrew P. RUSH and Edna M. Rush.
Judges: Before WILLIAMSON, C. J., and WEBBER, TAPLEY, MARDEN, DU-FRESNE and WEATHERBEE, JJ.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 248
Pages: 764–764

Head Matter:
Richard McAVOY v. Andrew P. RUSH and Edna M. Rush.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.
Jan. 7, 1969.
Forrest W. Barnes, Houlton, for plaintiff.
Thomas O. Bither, Houlton, for defendants.
Before WILLIAMSON, C. J., and WEBBER, TAPLEY, MARDEN, DU-FRESNE and WEATHERBEE, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from the decision of a single Justice to whom the case was submitted without either jury or complete record of the evidence.
Upon cases so submitted "(f)indings of fact shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous," Rule 52 M.R.C.P., which but declares long standing law, and the burden is upon appellant to demonstrate clear error. Sowles v. Beaumier, Me., 227 A.2d 473 [4], 475.
Without a record of the testimony we have nothing by which to measure the findings of fact upon which decision rests.
Appeal dismissed.