Case Name: Carl MULLINGS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-11-28
Citations: 553 So. 2d 287
Docket Number: No. 89-2129
Parties: Carl MULLINGS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before COPE, LEVY and GERSTEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 553
Pages: 287–288

Head Matter:
Carl MULLINGS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 89-2129.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 28, 1989.
Carl Mullings, in pro. per.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Giselle D. Lylen, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.
Before COPE, LEVY and GERSTEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Carl Mullings, appeals from a trial court order denying his motion for post-conviction relief under rule 3.850, Flor ida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We affirm the order of the trial court based upon a holding that the motion was untimely filed; and the issues raised therein were procedurally barred and/or without merit. Rose v. State, 472 So.2d 1155 (Fla.1985); Zeigler v. State, 452 So.2d 537 (Fla.1984); Brown v. State, 430 So.2d 446 (Fla.1983); Ford v. State, 407 So.2d 907 (Fla.1981); Ponder v. State, 530 So.2d 1057 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Paez v. State, 512 So.2d 263 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Williams v. State, 473 So.2d 11 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).