Case Name: Desiree Nicole BAILEY, the former wife, Appellant, v. Michael Andrew BAILEY, the former husband, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2017-10-16
Citations: 227 So. 3d 768
Docket Number: CASE NO. 1D17-453
Parties: Desiree Nicole BAILEY, the former wife, Appellant, v. Michael Andrew BAILEY, the former husband, Appellee.
Judges: ROBERTS, WETHERELL, and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 227
Pages: 768–768

Head Matter:
Desiree Nicole BAILEY, the former wife, Appellant, v. Michael Andrew BAILEY, the former husband, Appellee.
CASE NO. 1D17-453
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Opinion filed October 16, 2017
William S. Graessle and Jonathan W. Graessle of William S. Graessle, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellant.
Lisa A. March of the Law Office of Lisa A. March, P.A., Jacksonville Beach, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this post-dissolution appeal, we agree with the former wife that the trial court erred in requiring the parties to equally split the responsibility of transportation for timesharing because that issue was not pled or tried by consent. Accordingly, we reverse that portion of the challenged order. In all other respects, we affirm the order.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.
ROBERTS, WETHERELL, and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR.
. Unlike the former wife, we do not read the order to modify the limitation on overnights embodied in the consent final judgment. Instead, as the former husband conceded in his brief, "he is still limited to 130 overnights."