Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Zantwan Devorris WORTHY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-11-24
Citations: 353 F. App'x 830
Docket Number: No. 09-7419
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Zantwan Devorris WORTHY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 353
Pages: 830–831

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Zantwan Devorris WORTHY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-7419.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 17, 2009.
Decided: Nov. 24, 2009.
Zantwan Devorris Worthy, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Hairston, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Zantwan Devorris Worthy appeals the district court's order denying his motion filed under Fed.R.Crim.P. 36. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Worthy, No. 1:07-cr-00127-NCT-1 (M.D.N.C. July 20, 2009). Further, we deny Worthy's motion to consolidate. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.