Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stanley Mills STANERT, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1985-08-28
Citations: 769 F.2d 1410
Docket Number: No. 84-5128
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stanley Mills STANERT, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before GOODWIN, POOLE, and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 769
Pages: 1410–1410

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stanley Mills STANERT, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 84-5128.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Aug. 28, 1985.
Roger W. Haines, Jr., Maria T. Arroryo-Tabin, Asst. U.S. Attys., San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.
Craig E. Weinerman, San Diego, Cal., for defendant-appellant.
Before GOODWIN, POOLE, and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
The opinion in this case, which was filed June 5, 1985, 762 F.2d 775, is amended by adding a footnote 1 at the end of the third full paragraph in Part III, at p. 780, beginning, "In his motion for an evidentiary hearing before the district judge____" Footnote 1 shall read:
The question whether a defendant has made a sufficient preliminary showing to entitle him to a Franks [v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 98 S.Ct. 2674, 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978)] hearing is reviewable de novo. United States v. Ritter, 752 F.2d 435, 439 (9th Cir.1985).
As amended, the panel has unanimously voted to deny the petition for rehearing. The mandate shall issue in accordance with Fed.R.App.P. 41(a).