Case Name: JOHN BENJAMIN ODOM, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada
Jurisdiction: Nevada
Decision Date: 1975-07-23
Citations: 91 Nev. 473
Docket Number: No. 7796
Parties: JOHN BENJAMIN ODOM, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Nevada Reports
Volume: 91
Pages: 473–474

Head Matter:
JOHN BENJAMIN ODOM, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.
No. 7796
July 23, 1975
538 P.2d 167
Morgan D. Harris, Public Defender, and Howard N. Ecker, Deputy Public Defender, Clark County, for Appellant.
Robert. List, Attorney General; George E. Holt, District Attorney, and Dan M. Seaton, Deputy District Attorney, Clark County, for Respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION
Per Curiam:
A jury found John Benjamin Odom guilty on one count of burglary and one count of larceny. On appeal he contends that prejudicial error was committed when the trial judge refused to allow a challenge for cause to one of the jurors who was later excused peremptorily.
Although the appellant later exhausted his peremptory challenges, there remained no one on the jury whom the appellant had challenged for cause. In Mears v. State, 83 Nev. 3, 12, 422 P.2d 230, 235-236 (1967), where the identical issúé was raised, we refused to decide whether the trial court erred in denying the challenge for cause. See also State of Nevada v. Raymond, 11 Nev. 98 (1876). Cf. Bryant v. State, 72 Nev. 330, 305 P.2d 360 (1956).
Applying the rationale of Mears v. State, supra, we affirm.