Case Name: In the Matter of the Marriage of Leslie N. STAMBAUGH, Appellant - Cross-Respondent, and Evelyn Marie STAMBAUGH, Respondent - Cross-Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1991-02-27
Citations: 106 Or. App. 173
Docket Number: 88-3404; CA A64339
Parties: In the Matter of the Marriage of Leslie N. STAMBAUGH, Appellant - Cross-Respondent, and Evelyn Marie STAMBAUGH, Respondent - Cross-Appellant.
Judges: Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 106
Pages: 173–174

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted January 28,
judgment modified in part; otherwise affirmed on appeal and on cross-appeal February 27, 1991
In the Matter of the Marriage of Leslie N. STAMBAUGH, Appellant - Cross-Respondent, and Evelyn Marie STAMBAUGH, Respondent - Cross-Appellant.
(88-3404; CA A64339)
805 P2d 756
Paul Saucy, Salem, argued the cause for appellant - cross-respondent. With him on the brief was Saucy & Lipetzky, P.C., Salem.
D. Richard Fischer, Astoria, argued the cause for respondent - cross-appellant. With him on the brief was Larson & Fischer, Astoria.
Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Husband seeks review of a judgment of dissolution and makes five assignments of error; wife cross-appeals. Husband's only assignment that merits discussion is that the trial court made a mathematical error in computing the values of certain items of personal property. Wife concedes that the trial court erred when it valued the couple's Oregon personal property at $1,000. The true value is $2,000.
Wife's cross-appeal is without merit.
Paragraph 11 modified to reduce wife's judgment to $240,250; otherwise affirmed on appeal and cross-appeal. No costs to either party.