Case Name: Queen Knitting Mills, Inc., Respondent, v. Robert Robar, Doing Business as Lillian's, Appellant, et al., Defendant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1975-06-04
Citations: 36 N.Y.2d 912
Docket Number: 
Parties: Queen Knitting Mills, Inc., Respondent, v Robert Robar, Doing Business as Lillian’s, Appellant, et al., Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 36
Pages: 912–913

Head Matter:
Queen Knitting Mills, Inc., Respondent, v Robert Robar, Doing Business as Lillian’s, Appellant, et al., Defendant.
Submitted April 28,1975;
decided June 4, 1975
Hugh S. Silberstein for motion.
David T. Warshaw opposed.

Opinion:
Motion dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. (Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, § 36, pp 144-147.)