Case Name: Damien BARKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMPUTER SCIENCE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-08-24
Citations: 612 F. App'x 698
Docket Number: No. 15-1371
Parties: Damien BARKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMPUTER SCIENCE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 612
Pages: 698–698

Head Matter:
Damien BARKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMPUTER SCIENCE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 15-1371.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 20, 2015.
Decided: Aug. 24, 2015.
Damien Barker, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Richard Ward, III, Kullman Law Firm, New Orleans, Louisiana; Frank Daniel Wood, Jr., Kullman Firm, Birmingham, Alabama, for Appellee.
Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Damien Barker appeals the district court's order granting Computer Science Corporation's summary judgment motion on his harassment and discriminatory and retaliatory termination claims, brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. Barker v. Computer Science Corp., No. 1:13-cv-00857, 2015 WL 1442864 (E.D.Va. Mar. 27, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.