Case Name: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alfredo GONZALEZ-ESTRADA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-06-16
Citations: 67 F. App'x 466
Docket Number: No. 02-10060; D.C. No. CR-01-00833-RCC
Parties: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alfredo GONZALEZ-ESTRADA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before RYMER, THOMAS and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 67
Pages: 466–466

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alfredo GONZALEZ-ESTRADA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-10060.
D.C. No. CR-01-00833-RCC.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 9, 2003.
Decided June 16, 2003.
Before RYMER, THOMAS and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Alfredo Gonzalez-Estrada appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 30-month sentence for being an alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Gonzalez-Estrada has filed a brief stating that there are no meritorious issues for review, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Gonzalez-Estrada has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no further issues for review. Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.