Case Name: Mary F. Smith et al., Respondents, v. Howard Gould, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1901-04
Citations: 34 Misc. 518
Docket Number: 
Parties: Mary F. Smith et al., Respondents, v. Howard Gould, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 34
Pages: 518–518

Head Matter:
Mary F. Smith et al., Respondents, v. Howard Gould, Appellant.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,
April, 1901.)
Appellate Term — Order of reference of City Court not reviewable.
An order of reference made at a Special Term of the City Court of the city of New York is reviewable» by its General Term, but no further appeal lies to the Appellate Term.
Smith v. Gould, 33 Misc. Rep. 809, appeal dismissed.
Appeal from an order of the General Term of the City Court of the city of Hew York reversing an order of reference.
Howe & Hummel, for appellant.
Jacob Marks, for respondents.

Opinion:
Bischoff, P. J.
The determination at Special Term favorable to the motion for a reference was reviewable at the General Term and that court could in its discretion deny the motion, hut a further appeal to test the soundness of this exercise of discretion does not lie. Martin v. Windsor Hotel Co., 70 N. Y. 101.
Leventritt and Clarke, JJ., concur.
Appeal dismissed, with costs.