Case Name: Orazio Valenti and Another, Composing the Firm of Valenti & Priore, Respondents, v. Richard B. Constantine and Another, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1895-07
Citations: 96 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 607
Docket Number: 
Parties: Orazio Valenti and Another, Composing the Firm of Valenti & Priore, Respondents, v. Richard B. Constantine and Another, Appellants.
Judges: Brown, P. J., and Dykman, J., concurred.
Reporter: Supreme Court Reports (Hun)
Volume: 96
Pages: 607–607

Head Matter:
Orazio Valenti and Another, Composing the Firm of Valenti & Priore, Respondents, v. Richard B. Constantine and Another, Appellants.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.—

Opinion:
Pratt, J.:
We are of opinion that the referee's conclusions are sustained by the testimony. Not only was there considerable evidence that Constantine had personal notice of the work done by the plaintiffs, but it seems pretty well established that the tenant had authority to make repairs. He made them for some years, and until the present instance his authority was never questioned. There are no exceptions that require notice, and judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Brown, P. J., and Dykman, J., concurred.