Case Name: Clyde V. BRUMMELL, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Respondent
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1995-11-24
Citations: 322 Or. 331
Docket Number: OTC 3397, 3398; SC S41421
Parties: Clyde V. BRUMMELL, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 322
Pages: 331–332

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted November 2,
judgment of the Tax Court affirmed November 24, 1995
Clyde V. BRUMMELL, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Respondent.
(OTC 3397, 3398; SC S41421)
905 P2d 1153
Gary M. St. Louis, Portland, filed the brief for appellant and waived oral argument.
Rochelle Nedeau, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief was Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Taxpayer appeals from a judgment of the Oregon Tax Court that valued, for ad valorem tax purposes, two residential lots in Multnomah County as of July 1,1991. On de novo review, ORS 305.445, and after considering all taxpayer's arguments, we agree with the judgment of the Tax Court. An explanation of our reasons would not benefit bench or bar.
The judgment of the Tax Court is affirmed.