Case Name: Sarbjit Kaur KHABRA, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-08-17
Citations: 107 F. App'x 56
Docket Number: No. 03-71161, A70-864-884
Parties: Sarbjit Kaur KHABRA, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, RAWLINSON and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 107
Pages: 56–56

Head Matter:
Sarbjit Kaur KHABRA, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 03-71161, [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 9, 2004.
Decided Aug. 17, 2004.
Ashwani K. Bhakhri, Esq., Burlingame, CA for Petitioner.
Regional Counsel, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Richard M. Evans, Esq., Marion E. Guy-ton, Attorney, David Dauenheimer, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, RAWLINSON and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Sarbjit Kaur Khabra, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge's ("U") denial of her application for asylum, withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture ("Convention"). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, Garcia-Marbinez v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 1066, 1074 (9th Cir.2004), and we deny the petition for review.
Although the BIA did not make an express adverse credibility finding, it agreed with the IJ that petitioner had not met her burden of establishing eligibility for relief. Substantial evidence supports the BIA's finding. See id.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.