Case Name: Virgie Lee VALLEY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee, v. RAPIDES PARISH SCHOOL BOARD, et al., Defendants-Appellants, and Clyde Holloway, et al., Intervenors-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1983-04-29
Citations: 705 F.2d 112
Docket Number: No. 81-3462
Parties: Virgie Lee VALLEY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee, v. RAPIDES PARISH SCHOOL BOARD, et al., Defendants-Appellants, and Clyde Holloway, et al., Intervenors-Appellants.
Judges: Before CLARK, Chief Judge, POLITZ and RANDALL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 705
Pages: 112–113

Head Matter:
Virgie Lee VALLEY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee, v. RAPIDES PARISH SCHOOL BOARD, et al., Defendants-Appellants, and Clyde Holloway, et al., Intervenors-Appellants.
No. 81-3462.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 29, 1983.
John F. Ward, Jr., Baton Rouge, La., for Rapides.
Christopher Roy, Alexandria, La., Paul R. Baier, Baton Rouge, La., for Holloway, et al.
Louis Berry, Alexandria, La., for Valley, et al.
Franz R. Marshall, Gen. Lit. Section, Dennis J. Dimsey, William Bradford Reynolds, Brian K. Landsberg, Appellate Section, Civ. Rights Div., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D.C., for U.S., intervenor.
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, POLITZ and RANDALL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Petition for Rehearing of intervenors-appellants, Clyde Holloway, et al., is DENIED and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en bane, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 16) the Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.
CLARK, Chief Judge.
For the reasons stated in my dissent to the panel opinion, I dissent from the denial of rehearing.