Case Name: Michael SEALY, Appellant, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1997-03-13
Citations: 690 So. 2d 654
Docket Number: No. 96-2199
Parties: Michael SEALY, Appellant, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, Appellee.
Judges: WEBSTER, MICKLE and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 690
Pages: 654–654

Head Matter:
Michael SEALY, Appellant, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, Appellee.
No. 96-2199.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
March 13, 1997.
Rehearing Denied April 16, 1997.
Michael Sealy, pro se.
William L. Camper, General Counsel, and Bradley R. Bischoff, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Parole Commission, Tallahassee, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court's order finding that the claim raised by appellant's initial petition for writ of mandamus was without merit. Such disposition is without prejudice, however, to appellant's right to institute a separate proceeding raising his challenges to the computation of his presumptive parole release date, which was established by appel-lee during the pendency of the proceedings below.
WEBSTER, MICKLE and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.