Case Name: David ROMERO, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Cross-Appellant
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-01-05
Citations: 763 So. 2d 1138
Docket Number: No. 98-2811
Parties: David ROMERO, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
Judges: POLEN, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 763
Pages: 1138–1139

Head Matter:
David ROMERO, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
No. 98-2811.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jan. 5, 2000.
Opinion on Rehearing Feb. 16, 2000.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Cherry Grant, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant/cross-appellee.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sarah B. Mayer, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee/cross-appellant.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
David Romero appeals his conviction on charges of burglary of a dwelling and dealing in stolen property. We are unpersuaded by Romero's arguments and affirm his judgment.
The state cross-appeals the trial court's refusal to sentence Romero under the Prison Releasee Reoffender Act because the court concluded burglary of an unoccupied structure did not fit within the felonies to which the Act applied. We previously held that for purposes of sentencing under the Act, the question of whether a dwelling was occupied or unoccupied was of no consequence. See Scott v. State, 721 So.2d 1245 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). However, this court recently receded from Scott in State v. Huggins, 744 So.2d 1215 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (en banc). Pursuant to Huggins, we affirm Romero's sentence.
AFFIRMED.
POLEN, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.