Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shawn Dewayne RUCKER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-08-17
Citations: 331 F. App'x 236
Docket Number: No. 08-4751
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shawn Dewayne RUCKER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 331
Pages: 236–237

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shawn Dewayne RUCKER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-4751.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 10, 2009.
Decided: Aug. 17, 2009.
Matthew A. Victor, Victor Victor & Hel-goe LLP, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. Charles T. Miller, United States Attorney, Miller Bushong, Assistant United States Attorney, Beckley, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding-precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Shawn Dewayne Rucker appeals the district court's order revoking his supervised release, rejecting his claim that he was entitled to a two-level reduction in his offense level based upon the amendments to the crack cocaine sentencing guidelines, and imposing a twenty-one-month sentence upon revocation of supervised release. We have reviewed the record and find no re versible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Rucker, No. 5:03-cr-00097-1 (S.D.W.Va. July 15, 2008); see also United States v. Forman, 553 F.3d 585, 588-89 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 1924, 173 L.Ed.2d 1071 (2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.