Case Name: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. HECK'S, INC., Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1967-12-07
Citations: 387 F.2d 65
Docket Number: No. 11389
Parties: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. HECK’S, INC., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 387
Pages: 65–65

Head Matter:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. HECK’S, INC., Respondent.
No. 11389.
United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.
Argued Nov. 7, 1967.
Decided Dec. 7, 1967.
Burton L. Raimi, Attorney, N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Herman M. Levy, Attorney, N.L.R.B., on brief), for petitioner.
Frederick F. Holroyd, Charleston, W. Va., for respondent.
Before BOREMAN and BUTZNER, Circuit Judges, and WOODROW W. JONES, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The evidence adduced before the trial examiner, taken as a whole, provides a substantial factual basis to support the Board's determination that the Company violated sections 8(a) (3) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(a) (3) and (1), in the following respects: (a) in its discriminatory discharge of employee Hunt because of her union activities and in order to discourage such activities by other employees; and (b) in unilaterally increasing wages and decreasing hours in order to influence and coerce employees in their choice of a representative during the union organizing campaign.
Accordingly, enforcement of the Board's order is granted.
Enforcement granted.
. Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 340 U.S. 474, 71 S.Ct. 456, 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951).