Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymond Archie BOYD, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-08-05
Citations: 525 F. App'x 897
Docket Number: No. 12-15685
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymond Archie BOYD, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 525
Pages: 897–897

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymond Archie BOYD, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-15685
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Aug. 5, 2013.
Robert Edward Bodnar, Jr., U.S. Attorney’s Office, Orlando, FL, Peter J. Sholl, Robert E. O’Neill, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
James Wesley Smith, III, Rosemary Cakmis, Donna Lee Elm, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Orlando, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
James W. Smith, III, appointed counsel for Raymond Boyd, Jr., in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 886 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Boyd's conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
. We have conducted our review without applying the appeal waiver in the plea agreement because the district court failed to sufficiently discuss the waiver with Boyd at the change of plea hearing. See, e.g., United States v. Johnson, 541 F.3d 1064, 1066 (11th Cir.2008).