Case Name: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Guillermo RAMOS, Petitioner
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2013-02-27
Citations: 62 A.3d 373
Docket Number: 
Parties: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Guillermo RAMOS, Petitioner.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 62
Pages: 373–373

Head Matter:
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Guillermo RAMOS, Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Feb. 27, 2013.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 27th day of February, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, with slight rephrasing, is:
Did the Superior Court panel's decision affirming the trial court's judgment of sentence impermissibly impose a five (5) year mandatory minimum prison sentence pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S.A. Section 9712.1 in violation of Pennsylvania's indeterminate sentencing scheme mandated by 42 Pa.C.S.A. Section 9756(b), when the maximum sentence for the conviction is also five (5) years?