Case Name: In the Interest of J.H., R.H., T.H., T.H., J.H, and T.H., Respondents. Juvenile Officer, Respondent, Missouri Children's Division, Respondent, L.M.H., Respondent v. R.J. (Father) and T.H.J. (Mother), Appellants
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-10-24
Citations: 210 S.W.3d 263
Docket Number: Nos. WD 66565, WD 66566
Parties: In the Interest of J.H., R.H., T.H., T.H., J.H, and T.H., Respondents. Juvenile Officer, Respondent, Missouri Children’s Division, Respondent, L.M.H., Respondent v. R.J. (Father) and T.H.J. (Mother), Appellants.
Judges: Before LOWENSTEIN, P.J., SPINDEN and NEWTON, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 210
Pages: 263–264

Head Matter:
In the Interest of J.H., R.H., T.H., T.H., J.H, and T.H., Respondents. Juvenile Officer, Respondent, Missouri Children’s Division, Respondent, L.M.H., Respondent v. R.J. (Father) and T.H.J. (Mother), Appellants.
Nos. WD 66565, WD 66566.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Oct. 24, 2006.
Application for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Dec. 19, 2006.
Application for Transfer Denied Jan. 30, 2007.
John M. Cronan, for Appellants.
James A. Waits, for Respondent L.M.H.
William Jackson, III, for Respondent Juvenile Officer.
James R. Layton, for Respondent, MO. Children’s Division.
Katherine J. Rodgers, for Respondents JH, RH, TH, TH, JH, & TH.
Before LOWENSTEIN, P.J., SPINDEN and NEWTON, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Both parents' parental rights were terminated as to four of the six children. Parents' points on appeal concern specificity of social service plan, findings on their progress for reunification, and failure of the trial court to give effect to a prior ruling on their mental capacity. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).