Case Name: Frederick L. HOWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Alan WILSON, Attorney General for the State of South Carolina, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-06-28
Citations: 653 F. App'x 216
Docket Number: No. 16-6111
Parties: Frederick L. HOWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Alan WILSON, Attorney General for the State of South Carolina, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 653
Pages: 216–217

Head Matter:
Frederick L. HOWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Alan WILSON, Attorney General for the State of South Carolina, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 16-6111
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 23, 2016
Decided: June 28, 2016
Frederick L. Howell, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Frederick L. Howell appeals the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's report and recommendation and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), 1915A (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Howell v. Wilson, No. 4:15-cv-02561-JFA, 2015 WL 7272185 (D.S.C. Nov. 17, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED