Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jeremy HOLT, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-05-20
Citations: 105 S.W.3d 857
Docket Number: No. ED 81422
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jeremy HOLT, Appellant.
Judges: Before MARY R. RUSSELL, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 105
Pages: 857–857

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jeremy HOLT, Appellant.
No. ED 81422.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
May 20, 2003.
Emmett D. Queener, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
John Munson Morris III, Stephanie Morrell, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before MARY R. RUSSELL, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant Jeremy Holt ("Defendant") appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of the class C felony of receiving stolen property in violation of section 570.080 RSMo 2000. He contends the trial court plainly erred in permitting the state to argue facts not in evidence during its closing.
Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we find no plain error. Rule 30.20. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum for their use only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).