Case Name: Ronald Craig ASHCRAFT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1985-03-08
Citations: 464 So. 2d 697
Docket Number: No. 84-811
Parties: Ronald Craig ASHCRAFT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SCHOONOVER and LEHAN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 464
Pages: 697–698

Head Matter:
Ronald Craig ASHCRAFT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 84-811.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
March 8, 1985.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Douglas S. Connor, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corees, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
OTT, Acting Chief Judge.
After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we find that appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error and we therefore affirm. However, because of a clerical error in the court's written judgment, we remand for correction.
The parties agree that a jury found appellant guilty of unarmed burglary, a second-degree felony. However, the written judgment erroneously adjudicates appellant guilty of armed burglary, a first-degree felony. No sentence was imposed for this crime.
Consequently, we remand this cause to the trial court for correction of the clerical error. See Zigler v. State, 446 So.2d 266 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). In all other respects, this cause is affirmed.
AFFIRMED AND REMANDED FOR CORRECTION OF JUDGMENT.
SCHOONOVER and LEHAN, JJ., concur.