Case Name: Henry Warnock, as Administrator of the Estate of Francis Warnock, Deceased, Appellant, v. Francis Monje, Doing Business under the Name of Adrian Monje and Son, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1952-01-16
Citations: 279 A.D. 842
Docket Number: 
Parties: Henry Warnock, as Administrator of the Estate of Francis Warnock, Deceased, Appellant, v. Francis Monje, Doing Business under the Name of Adrian Monje and Son, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 279
Pages: 842–842

Head Matter:
Henry Warnock, as Administrator of the Estate of Francis Warnock, Deceased, Appellant, v. Francis Monje, Doing Business under the Name of Adrian Monje and Son, Respondent.

Opinion:
Memorandum: The recital by the defendant as to how the accident happened if made by him, (as we understand it was from this confused record) was properly received in evidence as an admission. (Richardson on Evidence [6th ed.], § 357, p. 291; Reed v. McCord, 160 N. Y. 330.) The probative value of the defendant's recital was for the determination of the jury. (Gangi v. Fradus, 227 N. Y. 452, 457.) We think that the statement of the defendant, together with the other evidence presented, required that the question of negligence or freedom from negligence on the part of the defendant be submitted for the determination of the jury. All concur. (Appeal from a judgment dismissing the complaint in a negligence action.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Vaughan, Kimball, Piper and Wheeler, JJ.