Case Name: Edward SIMPSON-EL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-02-26
Citations: 69 S.W.3d 147
Docket Number: No. ED 79483
Parties: Edward SIMPSON-EL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 69
Pages: 147–147

Head Matter:
Edward SIMPSON-EL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 79483.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Feb. 26, 2002.
Jennifer S. Walsh, Assistant Public Defenders, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Karen L. Kramer, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Edward Simpson-El (Appellant) appeals the trial court's denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 24.035, without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the trial court are not clearly erroneous. Moss v. State, 10 S.W.3d 508, 511 (Mo.banc 2000). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2001, unless otherwise noted.