Case Name: Panagiotis KOTSOPOULOS, Plaintiff-Appellant-Appellee, v. ASTURIA SHIPPING CO., S. A., Hadjilias & Co., Ltd., and S/T MERCURY, her engines, etc., Defendants-Appellees-Appellants; Stavros REPOUSKOS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ASTURIA SHIPPING CO., S. A., Hadjilias & Co., Ltd., and S/T Mercury, her engines, etc., Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1969-05-22
Citations: 410 F.2d 399
Docket Number: Nos. 598-600, Dockets 33063, 33064, 33066
Parties: Panagiotis KOTSOPOULOS, Plaintiff-Appellant-Appellee, v. ASTURIA SHIPPING CO., S. A., Hadjilias & Co., Ltd., and S/T MERCURY, her engines, etc., Defendants-Appellees-Appellants. Stavros REPOUSKOS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ASTURIA SHIPPING CO., S. A., Hadjilias & Co., Ltd., and S/T Mercury, her engines, etc., Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 410
Pages: 399–399

Head Matter:
Panagiotis KOTSOPOULOS, Plaintiff-Appellant-Appellee, v. ASTURIA SHIPPING CO., S. A., Hadjilias & Co., Ltd., and S/T MERCURY, her engines, etc., Defendants-Appellees-Appellants. Stavros REPOUSKOS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ASTURIA SHIPPING CO., S. A., Hadjilias & Co., Ltd., and S/T Mercury, her engines, etc., Defendants-Appellants.
Nos. 598-600, Dockets 33063, 33064, 33066.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued May 20, 1969.
Decided May 22, 1969.
Paul C. Matthews, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant-appellee Kotsopoulos and plaintiff-appellee Repouskos.
Thomas J. Doyle, New York City (Cichanowicz & Callan, Victor S. Cichan-owicz and Herbert J. Kaplow, New York City, on the brief), for defendants-ap-pellees-appellants.
Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, FEINBERG, Circuit Judge, and TIMBERS, District Judge.
Sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
We affirm the judgments of the District Court which awarded damages of $52,500 to Panagiotis Kotsopoulos and $20,000 to Stavros Repouskos, and also the order of the District Court which denied the motion for an order declining jurisdiction in both cases, 240 F.Supp. 124.