Case Name: Ronald FINK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gary L. BASS, Manager c/o CCB; A.D. Robinson, Warden; Carl Mains, Assistant Warden c/o Programs; E.B. Walker, Assistant Warden c/o Operations; E. Davis, Institutional Investigator; E. Willis, Treatment Program Supervisor, Chairman c/o ICA; T. FORD, Chief Counselor; R. Parmentor, Counselor, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-07-26
Citations: 15 F. App'x 85
Docket Number: No. 01-6518
Parties: Ronald FINK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gary L. BASS, Manager c/o CCB; A.D. Robinson, Warden; Carl Mains, Assistant Warden c/o Programs; E.B. Walker, Assistant Warden c/o Operations; E. Davis, Institutional Investigator; E. Willis, Treatment Program Supervisor, Chairman c/o ICA; T. FORD, Chief Counselor; R. Parmentor, Counselor, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL and DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 15
Pages: 85–86

Head Matter:
Ronald FINK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gary L. BASS, Manager c/o CCB; A.D. Robinson, Warden; Carl Mains, Assistant Warden c/o Programs; E.B. Walker, Assistant Warden c/o Operations; E. Davis, Institutional Investigator; E. Willis, Treatment Program Supervisor, Chairman c/o ICA; T. FORD, Chief Counselor; R. Parmentor, Counselor, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 01-6518.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 12, 2001.
Decided July 26, 2001.
Ronald Fink, pro se.
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL and DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Ronald Fink appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Fink v. Bass, No. CA-01-186-2 (E.D.Va. Mar. 21, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.