Case Name: Eugene H. Duffy et al., on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Appellants, and Albert Engel et al., Proposed Intervenors-Appellants, v. James W. Wetzler, Individually and as Commissioner of Taxation and Finance of the State of New York, et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1992-07-07
Citations: 80 N.Y.2d 890
Docket Number: 
Parties: Eugene H. Duffy et al., on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Appellants, and Albert Engel et al., Proposed Intervenors-Appellants, v James W. Wetzler, Individually and as Commissioner of Taxation and Finance of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 80
Pages: 890–890

Head Matter:
Eugene H. Duffy et al., on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Appellants, and Albert Engel et al., Proposed Intervenors-Appellants, v James W. Wetzler, Individually and as Commissioner of Taxation and Finance of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.
Submitted May 18,1992;
decided July 7, 1992

Opinion:
Motion for leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as affirmed Supreme Court's order denying plaintiffs' postjudgment motion to renew or reargue the denial of class certification dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.