Case Name: Bienvenido LOPETEGUI, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1972-01-25
Citations: 257 So. 2d 914
Docket Number: No. 71-811
Parties: Bienvenido LOPETEGUI, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 257
Pages: 914–915

Head Matter:
Bienvenido LOPETEGUI, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 71-811.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan. 25, 1972.
Rehearing Denied March 8, 1972.
Donald F. Frost, Miami, for appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.
Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This appeal from a summary denial of a motion filed pursuant to CrPR 3.850 is affirmed upon authority of the rule that a motion pursuant to CrPR 3.850, 33 F.S.A., may not be used as a substitute for appeal. Peterson v. State, Fla.App.1970, 237 So.2d 223.
In the instant case the appellant has had a full appeal from his conviction, Lopeti-gui v. State, Fla.App.1970, 232 So.2d 399, and now seeks to challenge the procedural aspects of the cause again by motion. The motion was appropriately denied without evidentiary hearing by the trial judge.
Affirmed. '