Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John Fanning, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1949-12-29
Citations: 300 N.Y. 593
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John Fanning, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 300
Pages: 593–594

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John Fanning, Appellant.
Submitted November 28, 1949;
decided December 29, 1949.
John Fanning, appellant in person.
Frank S. Hogan, District Attorney (Edgar J. Nathan, 3d, and. Whitman Knapp of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The defendant's petition does not sufficiently allege a case of fraudulent use of perjured testimony by the prosecuting attorney to warrant relief by a coram nobis proceeding. The order should be affirmed.
Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Bromley, JJ., concur.
Order affirmed. [See 300 N. Y. 677.]