Case Name: PLEASANT VALLEY IRRIGATION COMPANY, LIMITED, a Corporation, Respondent, v. DONALD LORD and OLIVER LORD, Appellants
Court: Idaho Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Idaho
Decision Date: 1941-03-11
Citations: 62 Idaho 281
Docket Number: No. 6801
Parties: PLEASANT VALLEY IRRIGATION COMPANY, LIMITED, a Corporation, Respondent, v. DONALD LORD and OLIVER LORD, Appellants.
Judges: Budge, C. J., and Morgan, Holden and Ailshie, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Idaho Reports
Volume: 62
Pages: 281–282

Head Matter:
(No. 6801.
March 11, 1941.)
PLEASANT VALLEY IRRIGATION COMPANY, LIMITED, a Corporation, Respondent, v. DONALD LORD and OLIVER LORD, Appellants.
[111 Pac. (2d) 640.]
Elam & Burke and Thomas L. Martin, for Appellants.
Davison & Davison and Edwin Snow, for Respondents.

Opinion:
GIVENS, J.
This action involves respective water rights, claimed by appellant and respondents in Black's Creek, alias Ten-Mile Creek, conflicting as to priority both in time and amount.
The assignments of error challenge only the findings of fact; thus, issues of fact alone are the essence of the controversy.
The evidence, though conflicting, is sufficient to sustain the findings of fact and the judgment is therefore affirmed. (Evans v. Davidson, 58 Ida. 600, 77 Pac. (2d) 661; In re Randall's Estate, 58 Ida. 143, 70 Pac. (2d) 389; Eaton v. McWilliams, 52 Ida. 145, 12 Pac. (2d) 259; Walker v. Jackson, 48 Ida. 18, 279 Pac. 293; East wood v. Standard Mines & Mill. Co., 11 Ida. 195, 81 Pac. 382; McKissick v. Oregon Short Line Ry Co., 13 Ida. 195, 89 Pac. 629; Patrick v. Bisbee, 52 Ida. 369, 15 Pac. (2d) 730; Gordon v. Sunshine Mining Co., 43 Ida. 439, 252 Pac. 870; Lisenby v. Intermountain State Bank, 33 Ida. 101, 190 Pac. 355.)
Costs awarded to respondent.
Budge, C. J., and Morgan, Holden and Ailshie, JJ., concur.