Case Name: Otto Kadmon v. United States
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1957-01-17
Citations: 38 Cust. Ct. 580
Docket Number: Reap. Dec. 8734; Entry No. 905716-2/3
Parties: Otto Kadmon v. United States
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Volume: 38
Pages: 580–581

Head Matter:
(Reap. Dec. 8734)
Otto Kadmon v. United States
Entry No. 905716-2/3.
(Decided January 17, 1957)
Siegel, Mandell & Davidson for the plaintiff.
George Cochran Doub, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Opinion:
Wilson, Judge:
This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:
IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the export value of the merchandise at the time of exportation to the United States covered by the Appeal to Reappraisement enumerated above at which time such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade for export to the United States is the appraised unit value legs item of buying commission.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher domestic value for merchandise such or similar to the merchandise herein at the time of exportation thereof.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Appeal to Reap-praisement enumerated above may be submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.
On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value was the appraised unit value, less the item of buying commission.
Judgment will be entered accordingly.