Case Name: Rufino Tandoc et al., Appellants, v. Luckenbach Steamship Company, Inc., Respondent; William O. Dyer et al., Appellants, v. Luckenbach Steamship Company, Inc., Respondent; Vincente Aguirre et al., Appellants, et al., Plaintiff, v. Luckenbach Steamship Company, Inc., Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1957-01-10
Citations: 8 Misc. 2d 893
Docket Number: 
Parties: Rufino Tandoc et al., Appellants, v. Luckenbach Steamship Company, Inc., Respondent. William O. Dyer et al., Appellants, v. Luckenbach Steamship Company, Inc., Respondent. Vincente Aguirre et al., Appellants, et al., Plaintiff, v. Luckenbach Steamship Company, Inc., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 8
Pages: 893–893

Head Matter:
Rufino Tandoc et al., Appellants, v. Luckenbach Steamship Company, Inc., Respondent. William O. Dyer et al., Appellants, v. Luckenbach Steamship Company, Inc., Respondent. Vincente Aguirre et al., Appellants, et al., Plaintiff, v. Luckenbach Steamship Company, Inc., Respondent.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
January 10, 1957.
Richard Qyory for appellants.
Francis I. Fallon for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The finding of the court below that the causes of action arose in California at the time of the discharge of the plaintiffs when they left the vessel and applying the four-year