Case Name: Steven M. BANKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-09-06
Citations: 566 So. 2d 366
Docket Number: No. 89-1536
Parties: Steven M. BANKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: COBB, GOSHORN and PETERSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 566
Pages: 366–366

Head Matter:
Steven M. BANKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 89-1536.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Sept. 6, 1990.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Glen P. Gifford, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The sentence imposed upon appellant is reversed, and we remand for resentencing in accordance with Washington v. State, 564 So.2d 168 (Fla. 5th DCA June 21, 1990). A departure sentence may not be imposed at resentencing. Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla.1990).
The maximum period of incarceration that may be imposed in case number 87-4283, including the one-cell bump-up for violation of probation, is 30 months. In case number 88-9627, the maximum period of incarceration that may be imposed for 3⅜ years, including the one-cell bump-up for committing the new offense while on probation for the old offense. The increased penalty for the new offense results from the "one scoresheet" concept of the sentencing guidelines. Peters v. State, 531 So.2d 121 (Fla.1988).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
COBB, GOSHORN and PETERSON, JJ., concur.