Case Name: RAYMOND VAN DUREN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. LEIGH E. RZASA-ORMES, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 2008-06-19
Citations: 195 N.J. 230
Docket Number: 
Parties: RAYMOND VAN DUREN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. LEIGH E. RZASA-ORMES, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: For Justice RABNER and Justices LONG, LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, WALLACE, RIVERA-SOTO and
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 195
Pages: 230–230

Head Matter:
948 A.2d 1285
RAYMOND VAN DUREN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. LEIGH E. RZASA-ORMES, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Kevin McNulty, argued the cause for appellant (Gibbons and Schepisi & McLaughlin, attorneys; Mr. McNulty, Michael R. Griffinger, John A. Schepisi and Glenn M. Finkel, on the briefs).
Steven R. Klein, argued the cause for respondent (Cole, Schotz, Meisel, Forman & Leonard, attorneys; Mr. Klein and Susan M. Usatine, on the briefs).
David G. Evans, submitted a brief on behalf of amicus curiae Pacific Legal Foundation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Parrillo's opinion for the Appellate Division, reported at 394 N.J.Super. 254, 926 A.2d 372 (2007).
For Justice RABNER and Justices LONG, LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, WALLACE, RIVERA-SOTO and