Case Name: The City of East Liverpool v. Dawson
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1920-06-22
Citations: 101 Ohio St. 527
Docket Number: No. 16474
Parties: The City of East Liverpool v. Dawson.
Judges: Nichols, C. J., Jones, Johnson, Wanamaker, Robinson and Merrell, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, New Service
Volume: 101
Pages: 527–527

Head Matter:
The City of East Liverpool v. Dawson.
Municipal corporations — Intoxicating liquors — Unlawful to keep, store or use in certain places — Constitutionality of ordinance — Section 9, Article XV, and Section 3, Article XVIII, Constitution.
(No. 16474
Decided June 22, 1920.)
Error .to the Court of Appeals of Columbiana county.
Mr. R. G. Thompson, city solicitor; Mr, J. A. White and Mr. Charles M. Earhart, for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Blaine H. Cochran and Mr. George T. Farrell, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
It is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the said court of appeals be, and the same hereby is, reversed, and the judgment of the court of common pleas of Columbiana county be, and the same is hereby, affirmed, for the reason that Ordinance No. 1664 of the-City of East Liverpool, declaring it unlawful to keep, store, or use intoxicating liquors in certain places, is a valid exercise of municipal power under the grant of Section 3, Article XVIII, of the Constitution of the State of Ohio, and not in conflict with Section 9, Article XV, of said Constitution.
Judgment of the court of appeals reversed, and that of common pleas affirmed.
Nichols, C. J., Jones, Johnson, Wanamaker, Robinson and Merrell, JJ., concur.
Matthias, J., not participating.