Case Name: Ronald FARAH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-06-14
Citations: 762 So. 2d 989
Docket Number: No. 4D00-1449
Parties: Ronald FARAH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: STONE, KLEIN andHAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 762
Pages: 989–989

Head Matter:
Ronald FARAH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D00-1449.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
June 14, 2000.
Rehearing Denied Aug. 4, 2000.
Ronald Farah, Atlanta, Georgia, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the order of the trial court denying Appellant's Motion to Vacate and Set Aside Sentence as being legally insufficient. See State v. Shearer, 628 So.2d 1102 (Fla.1993)(requiring such motions contain either a "Notarized Oath" or "Unnotarized Oath.") and Brown v. State, 661 So.2d 95 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)(holding the trial court properly denied defendant's motion as legally insufficient because it was neither under oath nor included the requisite contents set out in rule 3.850(c), Fla.R.App.P.) Furthermore, Appellant is procedurally barréd from filing his 3.850 motion because his failure to file within the two-year time period is not based on "facts which were unknown to the defendant or his attorney, and could not have been ascertained by due diligence." Rule 3.850(b)(1).
We also deny Petitioner's writ for error coram nobis which he filed pursuant to Wood v. State, 750 So.2d 592.(Fla.1999). See Hallman v. State, 371 So.2d 482 (Fla.1979),
Affirmed and Denied.
STONE, KLEIN andHAZOURI, JJ., concur.