Case Name: In the Matter of the Claim of Maria Di Amore, Respondent, v. Ninth Federal & Savings Loan Association et al., Appellants. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1963-11-21
Citations: 13 N.Y.2d 1025
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Claim of Maria Di Amore, Respondent, v. Ninth Federal & Savings Loan Association et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 13
Pages: 1025–1027

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Claim of Maria Di Amore, Respondent, v. Ninth Federal & Savings Loan Association et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.
Argued October 30, 1963;
decided November 21, 1963.
Albert P. Thill for appellants.
Louis J. Lefkoivits, Attorney-General (Jorge L. Gomes, Paxton Blair and Daniel Polansky of counsel), for Workmen’s Compensation Board, respondent.
No appearance for claimant-respondent.

Opinion:
Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Workmen's Compensation Board; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Burke, Foster and Scileppi. Judge Van Voorhis dissents and votes to reverse and to dismiss the claim upon the ground that there is no substantial evidence that decedent's heart attack was caused by his employment.