Case Name: Samuel Kimball against Levi Munson, Cook and Wilson
Court: Connecticut Superior Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1786-02
Citations: 2 Kirby 3
Docket Number: 
Parties: Samuel Kimball against Levi Munson, Cook and Wilson.
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 2
Pages: 3–5

Head Matter:
Samuel Kimball against Levi Munson, Cook and Wilson.
Canfield for the defendant
Reeve and Tracy for the plaintiff
Verdict for the plaintiff,

Opinion:
Accepted by the Court:—
Judge Dyer
said that Wilson ought to have been found guilty, for he first set the matter in motion, and gave countenance to it after the plaintiff was brought back, and such acts of Pettit Tyranny ought to be severely checked.