Case Name: Tanyin B. HOLLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. D. SHIRLEY, Correctional Officer, Defendant-Appellee, and Dixon, Correctional Officer; E.P. Ward, Sergeant, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-05-16
Citations: 521 F. App'x 176
Docket Number: No. 12-8122
Parties: Tanyin B. HOLLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. D. SHIRLEY, Correctional Officer, Defendant-Appellee, and Dixon, Correctional Officer; E.P. Ward, Sergeant, Defendants.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 521
Pages: 176–177

Head Matter:
Tanyin B. HOLLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. D. SHIRLEY, Correctional Officer, Defendant-Appellee, and Dixon, Correctional Officer; E.P. Ward, Sergeant, Defendants.
No. 12-8122.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 25, 2013.
Decided: May 16, 2013.
Tanyin B. Holley, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Lawrence Dumville, Norris & St. Clair, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Tanyin B. Holley, Sr., appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to Defendant D. Shirley in Holley's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no re versible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Holley v. Shirley, No. l:ll-cv-00508-GBL-JFA (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 19 & entered Nov. 20, 2012). We deny Holley's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.