Case Name: Lanette MITCHELL, Respondent v. Evan SHIKORA, D.O., University of Pittsburgh Physicians d/b/a Womancare Associates, Magee Womens Hospital of UPMC, Petitioners
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2017-11-20
Citations: 174 A.3d 573
Docket Number: No. 190 WAL 2017
Parties: Lanette MITCHELL, Respondent v. Evan SHIKORA, D.O., University of Pittsburgh Physicians d/b/a Womancare Associates, Magee Womens Hospital of UPMC, Petitioners
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 174
Pages: 573–574

Head Matter:
Lanette MITCHELL, Respondent v. Evan SHIKORA, D.O., University of Pittsburgh Physicians d/b/a Womancare Associates, Magee Womens Hospital of UPMC, Petitioners
No. 190 WAL 2017
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
November 20, 2017

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 20th day of November, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO Petitioners' second issue, as stated by Petitioners:
Whether the Superior Court's holding directly conflicts with this Honorable Court's holdings in Brady v. Urbas, 631 Pa. 329, 111 A.3d 1156 (2015), which permits evidence of general risks and complications in a medical negligence claim?
The Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED as to all remaining issues. Petitioners', Application to. File Supplement to Petition for Allowance of Appeal , is DENIED.