Case Name: The State ex rel. Aloi, Appellant, v. Klide, Judge, Appellee
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1993-10-13
Citations: 67 Ohio St. 3d 442
Docket Number: No. 93-695
Parties: The State ex rel. Aloi, Appellant, v. Klide, Judge, Appellee.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 67
Pages: 442–443

Head Matter:
The State ex rel. Aloi, Appellant, v. Klide, Judge, Appellee.
[Cite as State ex rel. Aloi v. Klide (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 442.]
(No. 93-695
Submitted June 15, 1993
Decided October 13, 1993.)
Tony Aloi, pro se.
Robert D. Horowitz, Stark County Prosecuting Attorney, and Arthur S. Leb, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We are aware of no procedural rule that authorizes a court to dismiss a complaint summarily on a question of law. See State ex rel. Hanson v. Guernsey Cty. Bd. of Commrs. (1992), 65 Ohio St.3d 545, 605 N.E.2d 378. Nevertheless, upon review of the arguments and exhibits submitted in this court, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.
We note that while some issues in the underlying action in appellee's court have been decided, an action for damages remains. Therefore, appellee may yet rule on the appellant's motions, and, if he fails to do so, any legal injury appellant suffers may be addressed on appeal.
Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.