Case Name: City of Chicago, Defendant in Error, v. Henry Jacobi, Plaintiff in Error
Court: Illinois Appellate Court
Jurisdiction: Illinois
Decision Date: 1916-01-17
Citations: 197 Ill. App. 493
Docket Number: Gen. No. 21,510
Parties: City of Chicago, Defendant in Error, v. Henry Jacobi, Plaintiff in Error.
Judges: 
Reporter: Illinois Appellate Court Reports
Volume: 197
Pages: 493–494

Head Matter:
City of Chicago, Defendant in Error, v. Henry Jacobi, Plaintiff in Error.
Gen. No. 21,510.
(Not to be reported in full.)
Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John A. Mahoney, Judge, presiding.
Heard in this court at the October term, 1915.
Affirmed.
Opinion filed January 17, 1916.
Statement of the Case..
Prosecution by the City of Chicago against Henry Jacobi, defendant, charging defendant with a violation of. section 2012 of the Revised Municipal Code of Chicago. To reverse a judgment of conviction entered on a verdict of guilty, with a fine of two hundred dollars, defendant prosecutes this writ of error.
Cantwell & Smith, for plaintiff in error.
Samuel A. Ettelson and Harry B. Miller, for defendant in error; Daniel Webster, of counsel.
See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Opinion:
Mr. Justice Holdom
delivered the opinion of the court.
Abstract of the Decision.
1. Appeal and error, § 822 —when rulings on motions must he preserved in hill of exceptions. In order to preserve for review the rulings of the trial court on motions, the evidence of such rulings must be preserved in a bill of exceptions, and it is not sufficient that the rulings are copied into the statutory record.
2. Appeal and error, § 824 —when exceptions to rulings of trial court not part of record. Exceptions to the rulings of the trial court which appear in the record but are not preserved by the bill of exceptions are not a part of the record, and the errors assigned thereon cannot be considered on review.
3. Municipal Court of Chicago, § 28 —how rulings on petition for change of venue must he preserved for review. The rulings of the Municipal Court on a petition for a change of venue are not before the Appellate Court unless the petition and rulings thereon appear either by a bill of exceptions, stenographic report or a statement of facts as provided by section 23 of the Municipal Court Act (J. & A. H 3335).
4. Appeal and error, § 1751 —when judgment affirmed on writ of error. On a writ of error where the questions sought to be presented are not preserved in such manner that they can be reviewed by the Appellate Court, the judgment of the lower court must be affirmed.