Case Name: Ricky VIVEIROS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2018-09-14
Citations: 252 So. 3d 1285
Docket Number: Case No. 5D17-3496
Parties: Ricky VIVEIROS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 252
Pages: 1285–1285

Head Matter:
Ricky VIVEIROS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Case No. 5D17-3496
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Opinion filed September 14, 2018
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Andrew Mich, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marjorie Vincent-Tripp, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm, without further discussion, Ricky Viveiros's judgment and sentence imposed in this case. However, we remand for the trial court to enter a written order to specifically reflect the conditions of violation that the trial court orally announced. See Lewis v. State, 8 So.3d 370, 371 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009) ; Payne v. State, 920 So.2d 742, 743 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). Further, the record reflects two condition 5 violations but the State only proceeded on one condition 5 violation. On remand, the written order should only reflect the violation for disorderly intoxication. See Kemp v. State, 135 So.3d 347, 347-48 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).
AFFIRMED and REMANDED with Instructions.
ORFINGER, BERGER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.