Case Name: Carlos MORAES, Appellant, v. CITY OF MIAMI, A Municipal Corporation, State of Florida, by and through its Department of Transportation and Traffic Control Devices, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Homestead Concrete & Drainage, Inc., a Florida Corporation, f/k/a Homestead Concrete & Drywall, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-10-16
Citations: 827 So. 2d 1104
Docket Number: No. 3D02-177
Parties: Carlos MORAES, Appellant, v. CITY OF MIAMI, A Municipal Corporation, State of Florida, by and through its Department of Transportation and Traffic Control Devices, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Homestead Concrete & Drainage, Inc., a Florida Corporation, f/k/a Homestead Concrete & Drywall, Appellees.
Judges: Before COPE, LEVY and GREEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 827
Pages: 1104–1105

Head Matter:
Carlos MORAES, Appellant, v. CITY OF MIAMI, A Municipal Corporation, State of Florida, by and through its Department of Transportation and Traffic Control Devices, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Homestead Concrete & Drainage, Inc., a Florida Corporation, f/k/a Homestead Concrete & Drywall, Appellees.
No. 3D02-177.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 16, 2002.
Michael R. Miller, Orlando, and Gail Scopinich, North Miami Beach, for appellant.
Carman, Beauchamp & Sang, Deerfield Beach, and Rhea P. Grossman, Miami, for appellee Traffic Control Devices, Inc.
George, Hartz, Lundeen & Fulmer and Michael L. Glass, Coral Gables, for appel-lee Homestead Concrete.
Before COPE, LEVY and GREEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
As the evidence is clear that the appel-lees had not taken physical possession of the work site and had not begun construction on it, the summary judgment is affirmed. See Verges v. Pacheco & Sons, Inc., 822 So.2d 542 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Cruz v. Gables Colony, Ltd., 579 So.2d 278 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).
Affirmed.