Case Name: The State ex rel. Sterne v. Hamilton County Board of Elections et al.
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1993-09-29
Citations: 67 Ohio St. 3d 605
Docket Number: No. 93-1778
Parties: The State ex rel. Sterne v. Hamilton County Board of Elections et al.
Judges: A.W. Sweeney, Douglas and Resnick, JJ., concur and concur separately.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 67
Pages: 605–609

Head Matter:
The State ex rel. Sterne v. Hamilton County Board of Elections et al.
[Cite as State ex rel. Sterne v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Elections (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 605.]
(No. 93-1778
Submitted and decided September 29, 1993
Opinion announced November 8, 1993. )
Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff and Donald J. Mooney, Jr.; Strauss & Troy and Eric H. Kearney, for relator.
Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, Philip L. Zorn, Jr. and James W. Harper, Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for respondents.
Taft, Stettinius & Hollister, Kim K. Burke and Mark G. Kobasuk, urging denial of the writ for amicus curiae, Hamilton County Conservative Forum.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
On September 29, 1993, the judgment in this case was announced. Our discussion and opinion in State ex rel. Mirlisena v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Elections (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 597, 622 N.E.2d 329 applies to this case. For the reasons stated in Mirlisena, supra, the requested writ of mandamus is allowed.
Writ allowed.
A.W. Sweeney, Douglas and Resnick, JJ., concur and concur separately.
Moyer, C.J., Wright and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur in judgment.
Pfeifer, J., concurs in judgment only.