Case Name: Alberto Antonio REYES, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-07-24
Citations: 474 F. App'x 698
Docket Number: No. 11-72327
Parties: Alberto Antonio REYES, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 474
Pages: 698–699

Head Matter:
Alberto Antonio REYES, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 11-72327.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 17, 2012.
Filed July 24, 2012.
Claudia Jasmine Lopez, Esquire, Law Offices of Mendez & Lopez, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.
Oil, Zoe Jaye Heller, Esquire, Trial, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Alberto Antonio Reyes, a native and citizen of Panama, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge's ("LJ") removal order. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law. Ramirez-Villalpando v. Holder, 645 F.3d 1035, 1038 (9th Cir.2011). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.
The BIA correctly determined that Reyes' conviction under California Health and Safety Code § 11378 constituted an aggravated felony which rendered him statutorily ineligible for cancellation of removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(B); 1229b(a)(3); United States v. Strickland, 601 F.3d 963, 968-69 (9th Cir.2010) (en banc).
Reyes' contention that the IJ abused her discretion in denying a continuance is moot because his motion to vacate his criminal conviction was denied. See Pedroza-Padilla v. Gonzales, 486 F.3d 1362, 1364 n. 2 (9th Cir.2007).
We lack jurisdiction to review the agency's denial of voluntary departure. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.