Case Name: BOARD OF TRADE OF THE CITY OF NEWARK, RESPONDENT, v. CITY OF NEWARK, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1923-02-01
Citations: 98 N.J.L. 555
Docket Number: 
Parties: BOARD OF TRADE OF THE CITY OF NEWARK, RESPONDENT, v. CITY OF NEWARK, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 98
Pages: 555–555

Head Matter:
BOARD OF TRADE OF THE CITY OF NEWARK, RESPONDENT, v. CITY OF NEWARK, APPELLANT.
Submitted December 11, 1922
Decided February 1, 1923.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 97 N. J. L. 52.
For the respondent, Pitney, Hardin & 8'kinner.
For the appellant, Jerome T. Congleton.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bergen in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chtbe Justice, Swayze, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Bus-kirk, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.