Case Name: Melvin HILL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2016-06-07
Citations: 491 S.W.3d 665
Docket Number: No. ED 103215
Parties: Melvin HILL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Kurt S. Odenwald, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 491
Pages: 665–666

Head Matter:
Melvin HILL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 103215
Missouri Court of Appeals,Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
Filed: June 7, 2016
Kevin B. Gau, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for Movant/Ap-pellant.
Colette E. Neuner, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for Respondent/Respondent.
Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Kurt S. Odenwald, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Melvin Hill appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k); Brooks v. State, 242 S.W.3d 705, 708 (Mo.banc 2008). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. Mo. R. Crim. P. 2014.