Case Name: JIN RIE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. State of CALIFORNIA, a government; et al., Defendants - Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-10-15
Citations: 296 F. App'x 586
Docket Number: No. 08-55099
Parties: JIN RIE, Plaintiff — Appellant, v. State of CALIFORNIA, a government; et al., Defendants — Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 296
Pages: 586–586

Head Matter:
JIN RIE, Plaintiff — Appellant, v. State of CALIFORNIA, a government; et al., Defendants — Appellees.
No. 08-55099.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 6, 2008.
Filed Oct. 15, 2008.
Jin Rie, Los Angeles, CA, pro se.
Jonathan B. Cole, Esquire, Nemecek & Cole, Sherman Oaks, CA, for DefendantsAppellees.
Before: WARDLAW, W. FLETCHER and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Appellant Jin Rie appeals a district court judgment dismissing his complaint as barred by the doctrines of state sovereign immunity, judicial immunity, res judicata and Rooker-Feldman. On April 18, 2008, this court issued an order to show cause why the district court's judgment should not be summarily affirmed.
A review of the record and the response to the court's order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.
All pending motions are denied as moot.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.