Case Name: EHQF TRUST, Appellant, v. S & A CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC., et al., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2007-01-09
Citations: 947 So. 2d 606
Docket Number: No. 4D06-3761
Parties: EHQF TRUST, Appellant, v. S & A CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC., et al., Appellee.
Judges: STONE, KLEIN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 947
Pages: 606–607

Head Matter:
EHQF TRUST, Appellant, v. S & A CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC., et al., Appellee.
No. 4D06-3761.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jan. 9, 2007.
EHQF Trust, Coconut Creek, pro se.
No appearance for appellee.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The notice of appeal filed by appellant, a trust, was not signed by an attorney licensed to practice law in Florida. Section 454.23, Florida Statutes (2006), prohibiting the unlicensed practice of law, provides no exception for representation of a trust. Although Florida has not previously addressed the issue, other states have concluded that a trustee cannot appear pro se on behalf of the trust, because the trustee represents the interests of others and would therefore be engaged in the unauthorized practice of law. Curry v. Kilgore, 2004 UT App. 112, 2004 WL 808673 (Utah Ct.App.2004); Ziegler v. Nickel, 64 Cal. App.4th 545, 75 Cal.Rptr.2d 312 (Cal.2d 1998); Life Science Church v. Shawano County, 221 Wis.2d 331, 585 N.W.2d 625 (1998); Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. Alexander, 79 Ohio St.3d 1220, 681 N.E.2d 934 (1997); Beaudoin v. Kibbie, 905 P.2d 939 (Wyo.1995); Back Acres Pure Trust v. Fahnlander, 233 Neb. 28, 443 N.W.2d 604 (1989); In re Ellis, 53 Haw. 23, 487 P.2d 286 (1971).
It is therefore ordered that this appeal will be dismissed unless appellant files an amended notice of appeal signed by an attorney licensed to practice law within twenty days of this order. This appeal is stayed pending compliance with this order.
STONE, KLEIN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.