Case Name: Larry D. NEELEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2009-02-24
Citations: 280 S.W.3d 737
Docket Number: No. WD 69639
Parties: Larry D. NEELEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before ALOK AHUJA, P.J., HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, J., and THOMAS H. NEWTON, C.J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 280
Pages: 737–737

Head Matter:
Larry D. NEELEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 69639.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Feb. 24, 2009.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 31, 2009.
Application for Transfer Denied May 5, 2009.
Larry D. Neeley, Cameron, pro se.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before ALOK AHUJA, P.J., HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, J., and THOMAS H. NEWTON, C.J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Larry Neeley appeals the circuit court's denial of his motion to reopen post-conviction proceedings. On appeal, Neeley argues that he was abandoned by post-conviction counsel because counsel raised, in an amended Rule 29.15 motion, only one of the nine issues Neeley raised in his pro se motion. The substance of Neeley's claim does not address any of the recognized situations implicating the narrow abandonment exception to the Rule 75.01 time limit on the circuit court's jurisdiction.
For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).