Case Name: Kalil A. ALKASAB, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-02-15
Citations: 121 F. App'x 123
Docket Number: Nos. 03-4435
Parties: Kalil A. ALKASAB, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before NORRIS, GIBBONS, Circuit Judges; and TODD, District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 121
Pages: 123–123

Head Matter:
Kalil A. ALKASAB, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY, Defendant-Appellee.
Nos. 03-4435
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Feb. 15, 2005.
Denise J. Knecht, Cleveland, OH, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Alexander E. Goetsch, Michael C. Cohan, Cavitch, Familo, Durkin & Frutkin, Cleveland, OH, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before NORRIS, GIBBONS, Circuit Judges; and TODD, District Judge.
The Honorable James D. Todd, Chief United States District Court Judge for the Western District of Tennessee, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff, Kalil A. Alkasab, appeals from the district court's grant of summary judgment to defendant, Cleveland State University, in this employment discrimination case.
Having had the benefit of oral argument and having carefully considered the record on appeal, the briefs of the parties, and the applicable law, we are not persuaded that the district court erred in granting summary judgment to defendant.
Because the reasoning which supports judgment for defendant has been articulated by the district court, the issuance of a detailed written opinion by this court would serve no useful purpose. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed upon the reasoning employed by that court in its Order and Decision dated September 26, 2003.