Case Name: Danita MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dean P. LOVEN; Lisa Bell, Judge; Felicia McAdoo, Chief Deputy Sheriff; Daniel Bailey, Sheriff, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-02-28
Citations: 412 F. App'x 630
Docket Number: No. 10-2240
Parties: Danita MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dean P. LOVEN; Lisa Bell, Judge; Felicia McAdoo, Chief Deputy Sheriff; Daniel Bailey, Sheriff, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 412
Pages: 630–630

Head Matter:
Danita MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dean P. LOVEN; Lisa Bell, Judge; Felicia McAdoo, Chief Deputy Sheriff; Daniel Bailey, Sheriff, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 10-2240.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 24, 2011.
Decided: Feb. 28, 2011.
Danita Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. Grady L. Balentine, Jr., Special Deputy Attorney General, Gerald Patrick Murphy, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; Sean Francis Perrin, Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Danita Mitchell appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her civil rights complaint. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Mitchell's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, Mitchell has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.