Case Name: MOORE et v. GERMAN FARMERS MUTUAL INSURANCE ASSN
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1933-05-03
Citations: 15 Ohio Law Abs. 212
Docket Number: No 5
Parties: MOORE et v GERMAN FARMERS MUTUAL INSURANCE ASSN
Judges: RICHARDS and POLLOCK, JJ, concur.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 15
Pages: 212–213

Head Matter:
MOORE et v GERMAN FARMERS MUTUAL INSURANCE ASSN
Ohio Appeals, 7th Dist, Monroe Co
No 5.
Decided May 3, 1933
T. J. Kremer, Woodsfield, for plaintiffs in error.
Moore, Moore & Moore, Woodsfield, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
OPINION
By FARR, J.
It is readily apparent, that Sussannah Minger, could insure only her interest in (his property, because there is no statement in any way, that the insurance would continue beyond her death.
Further discussion would seem unnecessary and without profit. For the reasons given, the trial court was right in directing a verdict, and the judgment is affirmed.
RICHARDS and POLLOCK, JJ, concur.