Case Name: James Edward MCLEAN, Jr., a/k/a James E. McLean, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN FCI ESTILL, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-02-12
Citations: 711 F. App'x 146
Docket Number: No. 17-7216
Parties: James Edward MCLEAN, Jr., a/k/a James E. McLean, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN FCI ESTILL, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 711
Pages: 146–147

Head Matter:
James Edward MCLEAN, Jr., a/k/a James E. McLean, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN FCI ESTILL, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 17-7216
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: January 26, 2018
Decided: February 12, 2018
James Edward McLean, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding . precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James Edward McLean, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McLean v. Warden, No. 9:16-cv-02956-MGL, 2017 WL 8783128 (D.S.C. Aug. 31, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED