Case Name: Ernest Schueler, Appellant, v. Julia P. Schueler, Defendant. Colden & O'Leary, Attorneys, Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1922-12
Citations: 204 A.D. 900
Docket Number: 
Parties: Ernest Schueler, Appellant, v. Julia P. Schueler, Defendant. Colden & O’Leary, Attorneys, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 204
Pages: 900–900

Head Matter:
Ernest Schueler, Appellant, v. Julia P. Schueler, Defendant. Colden & O’Leary, Attorneys, Respondents.

Opinion:
We are of opinion that the demands of respondents, in view of the fact that the professional integrity of one of them is directly involved, were so unreasonable as to justify their dismissal. The order is, therefore, reversed on the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion for substitution of attorneys granted; reserving to respondents, however, their right to recover for the value of their services in an action at law. Rich, Jaycox, Manning, Kelby and Young, JJ., concur.
Decisions by the Presiding Justice on Applications to Appeal from the Appellate Term.