Case Name: CHONG SU YI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CAPITAL ONE N.A., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-04-21
Citations: 600 F. App'x 124
Docket Number: No. 15-1015
Parties: CHONG SU YI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CAPITAL ONE N.A., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit' Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 600
Pages: 124–125

Head Matter:
CHONG SU YI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CAPITAL ONE N.A., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 15-1015.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 16, 2015.
Decided: April 21, 2015.
Chong Su Yi, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Allen Fitzgerald, McGuirewoods, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit' Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Chong Su Yi appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Yi v. Capital One N.A., No. 8:14-cv-03828-GJH (D.Md. Dec. 19, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.