Case Name: Shenae A. OUTERBRIDGE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-08-04
Citations: 390 F. App'x 209
Docket Number: No. 10-1442
Parties: Shenae A. OUTERBRIDGE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 390
Pages: 209–209

Head Matter:
Shenae A. OUTERBRIDGE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 10-1442.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 27, 2010.
Decided: Aug. 4, 2010.
Shenae A. Outerbridge, Appellant pro se. John DiCicco, Kenneth W. Rosenberg, Bridget Maria Rowan, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.; William J. Wilkins, Internal Revenue Service, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Shenae A. Outerbridge appeals from the tax court's order disallowing her claimed business expenses and determining a deficiency in her 2006 income tax. We have reviewed the record and the tax court's opinion and find no abuse of discretion and no clear error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. Out-erbridge v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, Tax Ct. No. 7907-08, 2009 WL 2169870 (U.S.T.C. July 21, 2009) & (Jan. 11, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.