Case Name: Michael NASIFF, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2010-09-01
Citations: 43 So. 3d 150
Docket Number: No. 4D08-2999
Parties: Michael NASIFF, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: HAZOURI, GERBER, JJ., and KELLEY, GLENN D., Associate Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 43
Pages: 150–151

Head Matter:
Michael NASIFF, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D08-2999.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Sept. 1, 2010.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Narine Austin, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Katherine Y. Mclntire, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is a direct appeal of a conviction for robbery based on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm without prejudice to file a proper motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In so doing, we make no finding with respect to the merits of appellant's claim; rather, we conclude that appellant's claim is not apparent on the face of the record. See Kidd v. State, 978 So.2d 868 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).
Affirmed.
HAZOURI, GERBER, JJ., and KELLEY, GLENN D., Associate Judge, concur.