Case Name: Randy A. THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1982-02-17
Citations: 409 So. 2d 1185
Docket Number: No. 80-479
Parties: Randy A. THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: DOWNEY and DELL, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, ALAN R., Associate Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 409
Pages: 1185–1186

Head Matter:
Randy A. THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 80-479.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb. 17, 1982.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Allen J. DeWeese, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Russell S. Bohn, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Applying the "interlocking confession" rule we reject the defendant's claim of harmful error in denying a severance and admitting the incriminating statement of his co-defendant. Parker v. Randolph, 442 U.S. 62, 99 S.Ct. 2132, 60 L.Ed.2d 713 (1979); Damon v. State, 397 So.2d 1224 (Fla.3d DCA 1981). His challenges to the retention of jurisdiction over the first third of his fifteen year sentence for third-degree murder under Section 947.16(3), Florida Statutes (1979) are similarly without merit. Borden v. State, 402 So.2d 1176 (Fla.1981); Arnett v. State, 397 So.2d 330 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Moore v. State, 392 So.2d 277 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). Because, however, grand theft was obviously the underlying felony which supported the finding that the appellant was guilty of third degree felony murder, the sentence, though not the conviction, for grand theft must be set aside. State v. Hegstrom, 401 So.2d 1342 (Fla.1981). The judgments under review are otherwise entirely affirmed.
DOWNEY and DELL, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, ALAN R., Associate Judge, concur.