Case Name: LOUIS TOMASINI et al., Petitioners, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF DEL NORTE COUNTY, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1888-03-06
Citations: 75 Cal. 225
Docket Number: No. 12511
Parties: LOUIS TOMASINI et al., Petitioners, d. SUPERIOR COURT OF DEL NORTE COUNTY, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Reports
Volume: 75
Pages: 225–226

Head Matter:
No. 12511.
Department Two
March 6, 1888.]
LOUIS TOMASINI et al., Petitioners, d. SUPERIOR COURT OF DEL NORTE COUNTY, Respondent.
Certiorari—Insolvency—Order Appointing Attorney bob Absent? Creditor—Election ob Assignee.—Orders appointing an attorney to vote for an absent creditor at the election of an assignee in an insolvent proceeding, and appointing as assignee the person chosen at such election, even if erroneous, cannot he reviewed on cerliorm'i, as the court had jurisdiction of the proceeding.'
Application for a writ of certiorari. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
L. F. Cooper, and Sawyer & Burnett, for Petitioners.

Opinion:
The Court.
—Writ of certiorari to review orders of
respondent appointing an attorney to vote for an absent creditor at the election of an assignee in an insolvent proceeding, and appointing as assignee the person chosen at such election.
If the petitioners were aggrieved at all by the action of the respondents, it was by the order confirming the election, and appointing the person selected assignee. But the court had jurisdiction of the proceeding; and the orders complained of, even if erroneous, cannot be reviewed on this writ. The prayer of the petitioner is denied and the writ dismissed.