Case Name: Daniel L. HOAG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1988-04-21
Citations: 523 So. 2d 788
Docket Number: No. 87-1857
Parties: Daniel L. HOAG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: COBB and COWART, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 523
Pages: 788–788

Head Matter:
Daniel L. HOAG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 87-1857.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
April 21, 1988.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Larry B. Henderson, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and W. Brian Bayly, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
DAUKSCH, Judge.
This is an appeal from a sentence which departs from that recommended by the sentencing guidelines. No written reasons for the departure were given. That is error. State v, Oden, 478 So.2d 51 (Fla.1985); Matthews v. State, 486 So.2d 47 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986).
SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED.
COBB and COWART, JJ., concur.