Case Name: Cincinnati Bar Association v. Rinderknecht
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1997-06-18
Citations: 79 Ohio St. 3d 30
Docket Number: No. 96-1993
Parties: Cincinnati Bar Association v. Rinderknecht.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 79
Pages: 30–32

Head Matter:
Cincinnati Bar Association v. Rinderknecht.
[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Rinderknecht (1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 30.]
(No. 96-1993
Submitted March 4, 1997
Decided June 18, 1997.)
John B. Pinney and James L. O’Connell, for relator.
H. Fred Hoefle, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We reject respondent's arguments that the panel incorrectly admitted the statement of a co-conspirator and that relator did not prove the violations by clear and convincing evidence. Furthermore, we accept the findings, conclusions, and recommended sanction of the board. Accordingly, we indefinitely suspend respondent from the practice of law in Ohio and tax costs to him.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.