Case Name: Emma J. CALHOUN, Individually, and as Natural Tutrix of her Minor Child, Krystal Renauda Calhoun and Cassandra J. Calhoun v. KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, David A. Watkins, the Parish of Desoto, through the Desoto Parish Fire District No. 8 and the Aetna Casualty and Surety Company; Emma J. Calhoun, Individually, and as Natural Tutrix of her Minor Child, Krystal Renauda Calhoun and Cassandra J. Calhoun v. The State of Louisiana, through the Department of Transportation and Development, and the Town of South Mansfield
Court: Louisiana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 2003-10-10
Citations: 855 So. 2d 357
Docket Number: No. 2003-C-2029
Parties: Emma J. CALHOUN, Individually, and as Natural Tutrix of her Minor Child, Krystal Renauda Calhoun and Cassandra J. Calhoun v. KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, David A. Watkins, the Parish of Desoto, through the Desoto Parish Fire District No. 8 and the Aetna Casualty and Surety Company. Emma J. Calhoun, Individually, and as Natural Tutrix of her Minor Child, Krystal Renauda Calhoun and Cassandra J. Calhoun v. The State of Louisiana, through the Department of Transportation and Development, and the Town of South Mansfield.
Judges: 
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 855
Pages: 357–358

Head Matter:
Emma J. CALHOUN, Individually, and as Natural Tutrix of her Minor Child, Krystal Renauda Calhoun and Cassandra J. Calhoun v. KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, David A. Watkins, the Parish of Desoto, through the Desoto Parish Fire District No. 8 and the Aetna Casualty and Surety Company. Emma J. Calhoun, Individually, and as Natural Tutrix of her Minor Child, Krystal Renauda Calhoun and Cassandra J. Calhoun v. The State of Louisiana, through the Department of Transportation and Development, and the Town of South Mansfield.
No. 2003-C-2029.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Oct. 10, 2003.

Opinion:
In re Travelers Casualty & Surety Company; — Defendant; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Deso-to, 11th Judicial District Court Div. A, Nos. 53,790, 56,733; to the Court of Ap peal, Second Circuit, No(s). 37,180-CA, 37,181-CA.
Denied.