Case Name: In re DETERMINATION OF PRIORITY OF COMMISSION AMONG CERTAIN JUDGES OF THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY. Petition of Nancy SOBOLEVITCH, Court Administrator of Pennsylvania (Two Cases). In re DETERMINATION OF PRIORITY OF COMMISSION AMONG CERTAIN JUDGES OF THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF NORTHAMPTON COUNTY
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1990-05-07
Citations: 524 Pa. 465
Docket Number: Nos. 10 and 11 E.D. Misc. Dkt. 1990
Parties: In re DETERMINATION OF PRIORITY OF COMMISSION AMONG CERTAIN JUDGES OF THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY. Petition of Nancy SOBOLEVITCH, Court Administrator of Pennsylvania (Two Cases). In re DETERMINATION OF PRIORITY OF COMMISSION AMONG CERTAIN JUDGES OF THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF NORTHAMPTON COUNTY.
Judges: Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, ZAPPALA, PAPADAKOS and CAPPY, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 524
Pages: 465–466

Head Matter:
573 A.2d 1025
In re DETERMINATION OF PRIORITY OF COMMISSION AMONG CERTAIN JUDGES OF THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY. Petition of Nancy SOBOLEVITCH, Court Administrator of Pennsylvania (Two Cases). In re DETERMINATION OF PRIORITY OF COMMISSION AMONG CERTAIN JUDGES OF THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF NORTHAMPTON COUNTY.
Nos. 10 and 11 E.D. Misc. Dkt. 1990.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued April 2, 1990.
Decided May 7, 1990.
Samuel J. Cordes, Pittsburgh, for Jeffrey A. Manning and Lee J. Mazur, JJ.
Michael C. Deschler, Bethlehem, for William F. Moran and Kimberly McFadden, JJ.
Cynthia Baldwin, McKeesport, David Max Baer, Robert Gallo and Paul Lutty, Judges-Elect and Paul Zavarella, P.J. Pittsburgh, for respondents at No. 10.
James C. Hogan, Easton, J. Alfred T. Williams, Jr., P.J., Bethlehem, and Robert P. Casey, Gov. of Pa., Harrisburg, for respondents at No. 11.
Howard M. Holmes, Charles W. Johns, Philadelphia, for intervenor — Court Admin, of Pa.
Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, ZAPPALA, PAPADAKOS and CAPPY, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Relief requested denied. See In re Determination of Priority of Commission Among Certain Judges of the Superior and Commonwealth Courts, 493 Pa. 555, 427 A.2d 153 (1981).