Case Name: Nathan R. Curtis, Respondent, v. The President, Managers and Company of the Delaware and Hudson Canal Company, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1896-03-13
Citations: 148 N.Y. 763
Docket Number: 
Parties: Nathan R. Curtis, Respondent, v. The President, Managers and Company of the Delaware and Hudson Canal Company, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 148
Pages: 763–763

Head Matter:
Nathan R. Curtis, Respondent, v. The President, Managers and Company of the Delaware and Hudson Canal Company, Appellant.
Mem. of decision below, 76 Hun, 610.
(Argued February 27, 1896;
decided March 13, 1896.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered upon an order made February 13, 1894, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and also affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Lewis L. Garr for appellant.
James W. Virbeek for respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur, except Andrews, Oh. J., not sitting, and Gray,. J., not voting.