Case Name: Patricia LEVIEGE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VODAFONE US INC., d/b/a Vodafone Americas, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-05-25
Citations: 689 F. App'x 758
Docket Number: No. 16-2413
Parties: Patricia LEVIEGE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VODAFONE US INC., d/b/a Vodafone Americas, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 689
Pages: 758–759

Head Matter:
Patricia LEVIEGE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VODAFONE US INC., d/b/a Vodafone Americas, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 16-2413
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 23, 2017
Decided: May 25, 2017
Monique Antonia Miles, OLD TOWNE ASSOCIATES, P.C., Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Emily Crandall Harlan, NIXON PEABODY LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Patricia Leviege appeals the district court's orders granting Vodafone US Inc.'s (Vodafone) motion to dismiss Leviege's employment discrimination, harassment, and retaliation claims against Vodafone, and denying Leviege's Fed. R. Civ, P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the dismissal order. We have considered the parties' arguments and have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Leviege v. Vodafone US Inc., No. 1:16-cv-00374-LMB-IDD (E.D. Va. Oct. 4, 2016 & Nov. 9, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED