Case Name: Kenneth Ray PRUITT, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Billy PERNELL, Sharpsburg Police Chief; Town of Sharpsburg, NC; M.L. Fellner, Officer; Joel Batchelor, Officer, Defendants-Appellants, and George Bottoms, Officer, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-04-03
Citations: 173 F. App'x 298
Docket Number: No. 05-1132
Parties: Kenneth Ray PRUITT, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Billy PERNELL, Sharpsburg Police Chief; Town of Sharpsburg, NC; M.L. Fellner, Officer; Joel Batchelor, Officer, Defendants—Appellants, and George Bottoms, Officer, Defendant.
Judges: Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 173
Pages: 298–299

Head Matter:
Kenneth Ray PRUITT, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Billy PERNELL, Sharpsburg Police Chief; Town of Sharpsburg, NC; M.L. Fellner, Officer; Joel Batchelor, Officer, Defendants—Appellants, and George Bottoms, Officer, Defendant.
No. 05-1132.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 28, 2006.
Decided: April 3, 2006.
Scott Christopher Hart, Sumrell, Sugg, Carmichael, Hicks & Hart, P.A., New Bern, North Carolina, for Appellants. Kenneth Ray Pruitt, Appellee Pro Se.
Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appellants appeal the district court's order denying qualified immunity in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Pruitt v. Pernell, No. CA-02-270-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 5, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED