Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James PAIGE, a/k/a Ness, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-08-20
Citations: 42 F. App'x 658
Docket Number: No. 02-6587
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James PAIGE, a/k/a Ness, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 42
Pages: 658–658

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James PAIGE, a/k/a Ness, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-6587.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 15, 2002.
Decided Aug. 20, 2002.
James Paige, Appellant Pro Se. Michael R; Smythers, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
James Paige seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Paige, Nos. CR-900-236; CA-01-1255-A (E.D.Va. Feb. 11, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.