Case Name: JAMES HENDERSHOT, RESPONDENT, v. NEW YORK, SUSQUEHANNA AND WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1928-02-07
Citations: 104 N.J.L. 436
Docket Number: 
Parties: JAMES HENDERSHOT, RESPONDENT, v. NEW YORK, SUSQUEHANNA AND WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 104
Pages: 436–437

Head Matter:
JAMES HENDERSHOT, RESPONDENT, v. NEW YORK, SUSQUEHANNA AND WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT.
Argued October 25, 1927
Decided February 7, 1928.
For the respondent, William C. Gebhardt & Son.
For the appellant, Hobart & Minard.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Lloyd, White, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.