Case Name: Thomas Murcott et al., Comprising the Firm of Murcott & Campbell, Respondents, v. The City of New York, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1913-05-13
Citations: 208 N.Y. 608
Docket Number: 
Parties: Thomas Murcott et al., Comprising the Firm of Murcott & Campbell, Respondents, v. The City of New York, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 208
Pages: 608–608

Head Matter:
Thomas Murcott et al., Comprising the Firm of Murcott & Campbell, Respondents, v. The City of New York, Appellant.
Muroott v. City of New Torlc, 152 App. Div. 911, affirmed.
(Argued April 24, 1913 ;
decided May 13, 1913.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered September 17,1912, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon the report of a referee in an action to recover alleged damages to plaintiffs’ real and personal property caused by water batiking up through sewer connections and flowing over the sidewalk into their premises.
Archibald R. Watson, Corporation Counsel (James D. Bell and Frank Julian Price of counsel), for appellant.
J. Steivart Ross for respondents.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Werner, Hiscocic, Collin, Cuddebacic and Miller, JJ.J