Case Name: FERGUSON v. GASKILL, Admr et
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1933-01-25
Citations: 13 Ohio Law Abs. 707
Docket Number: No 419
Parties: FERGUSON v GASKILL, Admr et
Judges: ALLREAD, PJ, HORNBECK and KUNKLE, JJ, concur.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 13
Pages: 707–708

Head Matter:
FERGUSON v GASKILL, Admr et
Ohio Appeals, 2nd Dist, Darke Co
No 419.
Decided Jan 25, 1933
Hughes & Rodgers for plaintiff in error.
Gaskill & Meaker, Greenville, and W. W. Teegardeni, Greenville, for defendant in error, D. L. Gaskill, Admr.
Charles W. Folkerth, Dayton, for B. E. Harnish, et.

Opinion:
BY THE COURT
Counsel for the plaintiff in error ask the court especially to certify that their judgment is in conflict with another judgment of the Court of Appeals in the case of Stearnes v Brandeberry, 9 Oh Ap 300. We undertook to distinguish the case of Stearnes v Brandeberry from the decision in the case at bar. We are of opinion therefore that the judgment for a certificate of conflict should be overruled. Application overruled.
ALLREAD, PJ, HORNBECK and KUNKLE, JJ, concur.