Case Name: Mark WEISMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1998-01-02
Citations: 703 So. 2d 1218
Docket Number: No. 97-606
Parties: Mark WEISMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: COBB and PETERSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 703
Pages: 1218–1219

Head Matter:
Mark WEISMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 97-606.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Jan. 2, 1998.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Lyle Hitchens, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robert J. Tylke, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appel-lee.

Opinion:
DAUKSCH, Judge.
In this Anders case, investigative costs were improperly imposed as a condition of probation when no request was made and no documentation provided, so the costs must be stricken. See Bisson v. State, 696 So.2d 504 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). In all other respects, the conviction and sentence are affirmed.
AFFIRMED; INVESTIGATIVE COSTS STRICKEN.
COBB and PETERSON, JJ., concur.