Case Name: SOUTHEAST FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI v. BRADSHAW
Court: Florida Circuit Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1982-10-20
Citations: 6 Fla. Supp. 2d 158
Docket Number: Case No. 81-389-AP
Parties: SOUTHEAST FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI v. BRADSHAW
Judges: Before GOLDMAN, ORR AND KORVICK, JJ.
Reporter: Florida Supplement Second
Volume: 6
Pages: 158–159

Head Matter:
SOUTHEAST FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI v. BRADSHAW
Case No. 81-389-AP
Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Appellate Division, Dade County
October 20, 1982
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
J. Robert Olian for appellant.
Mary Jane Bradshaw, pro se.
Before GOLDMAN, ORR AND KORVICK, JJ.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
KORVICK, Judge.
Appellant seeks review of a final judgment entered in behalf of Appellee denying recovery of a Deficiency balance owing from the appellee, Mary Jane Bradshaw.
Appellant raises the issue: Is a Bank regulated by Florida Statute 516.31, and states that the Appellant, Southeast First National Bank of Miami, is a banking institution, which the Florida legislature specifically intended to exclude from the provisions of Chapter 516.
This Appellate Panel, having reviewed the briefs and having heard arguments of counsel, reverses the finding of the trial court, and holds that the appellant, Southeast First National Bank of Miami, is a banking institution and that banking institutions are not governed by the provisions of Chapter 516.
Accordingly, we reverse the finding of the trial court and direct the court to enter a deficiency judgment against the appellee, Mary Jane Bradshaw.
REVERSED
Judges Goldman and Orr concur.