Case Name: LAW OFFICES OF PHILIP AUERBACH, Appellant, v. ROBERT M. SUSSMAN LAW OFFICES, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1986-02-25
Citations: 483 So. 2d 559
Docket Number: No. 85-2041
Parties: LAW OFFICES OF PHILIP AUERBACH, Appellant, v. ROBERT M. SUSSMAN LAW OFFICES, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 483
Pages: 559–559

Head Matter:
LAW OFFICES OF PHILIP AUERBACH, Appellant, v. ROBERT M. SUSSMAN LAW OFFICES, Appellee.
No. 85-2041.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 25, 1986.
Auerbach & Shillen and Donald T. Norton, Miami, for appellant.
Robert M. Sussman, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Applegate v. Barnett Bank, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979); Wilson v. Renfroe, 91 So.2d 857 (Fla.1956); Claughton v. Claughton, 452 So.2d 1073 (Fla.3d DCA 1984); § 38.10, Fla.Stat. (1983).