Case Name: Antoine SLOAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-03-06
Citations: 39 S.W.3d 74
Docket Number: No. ED 77843
Parties: Antoine SLOAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before MARY K. HOFF, C.J. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 39
Pages: 74–75

Head Matter:
Antoine SLOAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 77843.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
March 6, 2001.
Douglas R. Hoff, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, Attorney for Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General; Evan J. Buchheim, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, Attorney for Respondent.
Before MARY K. HOFF, C.J. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Movant, Antoine Sloan, appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have previously affirmed Movant's conviction for second degree drug trafficking in violation of section 195.223.3(2), RSMo 1994. State v. Sloan, 998 S.W.2d 142 (Mo.App. E.D.1999).
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).