Case Name: In the Matter of B. L. K., a Person Alleged to have Mental Illness. STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. B. L. K., Appellant.
Court: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2018-08-01
Citations: 422 P.3d 433
Docket Number: A166990
Parties: In the Matter of B. L. K., a Person Alleged to have Mental Illness.
Judges: Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Tookey, Judge, and Shorr, Judge.
Reporter: Pacific Reporter 3d
Volume: 422
Pages: 433–433

Head Matter:
In the Matter of B. L. K., a Person Alleged to have Mental Illness.
STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
B. L. K., Appellant.
A166990
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Submitted June 1, 2018.
August 1, 2018
Joseph DeBin and Multnomah Defenders, Inc., filed the brief for appellant.
Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Jordan R. Silk, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent
Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Tookey, Judge, and Shorr, Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Appellant seeks reversal of a supplemental judgment of continued commitment, committing him to the custody of the Mental Health Division for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant contends that the trial court plainly erred by failing to advise him of all of his rights that are applicable to a recommitment hearing, as required by ORS 426.301(3) and ORS 426.303. The state concedes that, under State v. M. M. , 288 Or. App. 111, 114-16, 405 P.3d 192 (2017), and State v. Montgomery , 147 Or. App. 69, 70, 934 P.2d 640 (1997), the trial court committed plain error that warrants reversal. We agree with the state, accept the concession, and, for the reasons stated in those cases, exercise our discretion to correct the error. Because we reverse the judgment on that basis, we do not address appellant's first assignment of error.
Reversed.