Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. James Alford CHATMAN, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1971-02-02
Citations: 436 F.2d 1377
Docket Number: No. 26120
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. James Alford CHATMAN, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 436
Pages: 1377–1377

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. James Alford CHATMAN, Appellant.
No. 26120.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Feb. 2, 1971.
Michael Korn, Van Nuys, Cal., for appellant.
Robert L. Meyer, U. S. Atty., David R. Nissen, Chief, Crim. Div., John W. Horn-beck, Asst. U. S. Atty., .Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Before MERRILL, KOELSCH and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The record manifests that the district court's denial of Chatman's mid-trial motion to dismiss counsel and to appoint a replacement did not constitute an abuse of discretion.
This conclusion is dispositive of the appeal.
Judgment affirmed.
. The record likewise demonstrates that counsel afforded Chatman effective legal representation.