Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Walter LUCKETT, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2008-08-26
Citations: 267 S.W.3d 750
Docket Number: No. ED 90483
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Walter LUCKETT, Appellant.
Judges: Before KURT S. ODENWALD, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 267
Pages: 750–750

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Walter LUCKETT, Appellant.
No. ED 90483.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Aug. 26, 2008.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 9, 2008.
Application for Transfer Denied Nov. 25, 2008.
Kent Denzel, Assistant Public Defender, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before KURT S. ODENWALD, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Walter Luckett ("Defendant") appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance following a bench trial in which he was found guilty of possession of a controlled substance, driving with a revoked license, and failure to display a valid license plate. Defendant contends that the State's evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that sufficient evidence was present to allow a reasonable fact-finder to find Defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).