Case Name: Robert BAKERMAN, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-01-11
Citations: 649 So. 2d 275
Docket Number: No. 93-1142
Parties: Robert BAKERMAN, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING, Appellee.
Judges: Before COPE, GERSTEN and GODERICH, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 649
Pages: 275–275

Head Matter:
Robert BAKERMAN, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING, Appellee.
No. 93-1142.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan. 11, 1995.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 22, 1995.
Rodger J. Bakerman, for appellant.
Richard A. Grumberg, Tallahassee, for ap-pellee.
Before COPE, GERSTEN and GODERICH, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Robert Bakerman appeals an order of the Department of Business Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering.
Assuming, without deciding, that appellant was entitled to an administrative appeal as a matter of right to the Division of Pari-Mutu-el Wagering, we find no reversible evidentia-ry error and conclude that the law was correctly applied. See Fla.Admin.Code R. 61D-1.008(16); Hyman v. State, Dep't of Business Regulation, Div. of Pari-Mutuel Wagering, 431 So.2d 603 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); § 550.2415, Fla.Stat. (1993).
Affirmed.