Case Name: Anthonia WORTHY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WORLD WIDE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.; Real Financial, L.L.C.; Homecomings Financial Network, Inc.; Select Portfolio Services, Inc., f/k/a Fairbanks Capital Corp.; Mortgage Electronic Registration Services, Inc., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-07-28
Citations: 192 F. App'x 369
Docket Number: No. 05-1171
Parties: Anthonia WORTHY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WORLD WIDE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.; Real Financial, L.L.C.; Homecomings Financial Network, Inc.; Select Portfolio Services, Inc., f/k/a Fairbanks Capital Corp.; Mortgage Electronic Registration Services, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: MARTIN, NORRIS, and McKEAGUE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 192
Pages: 369–369

Head Matter:
Anthonia WORTHY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WORLD WIDE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.; Real Financial, L.L.C.; Homecomings Financial Network, Inc.; Select Portfolio Services, Inc., f/k/a Fairbanks Capital Corp.; Mortgage Electronic Registration Services, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 05-1171.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
July 28, 2006.
Before: MARTIN, NORRIS, and McKEAGUE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff Anthonia Worthy appeals the district court's dismissal of his lawsuit filed pursuant to the Truth-in-Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq., and Michigan's Secondary Mortgage Loan Act, Mich. Comp. Laws § 493.51 et seq.
Having had the benefit of oral argument and having carefully considered the record on appeal, the briefs of the parties, and the applicable law, we are not persuaded that the district court erred in dismissing plaintiffs claims.
Because the reasoning that supports the dismissal has been articulated by the district court, the issuance of a detailed written opinion by this court would be duplicative and serve no useful purpose. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed upon the reasoning employed by that court in its Opinion and Order filed on December 13, 2004.