Case Name: Hope ROY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1958-11-12
Citations: 319 S.W.2d 705
Docket Number: No. 30100
Parties: Hope ROY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 319
Pages: 705–706

Head Matter:
Hope ROY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
No. 30100.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Nov. 12, 1958.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 14, 1959.
William E. Davenport, San Angelo, for appellant.
Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
WOODLEY, Judge.
The offense is passing as true a forged instrument; the punishment, two years.
Appellant, represented by counsel, waived a jury and pleaded guilty, and on the trial after the State had offered evidence sufficient to warrant her conviction, testified and admitted her guilt.
The requirements of the statute relating to trials of non-capital felony cases before the court on a plea of guilty were fully complied with.
The sole complaint appears to be that the trial judge did not see fit to grant probation.
The State correctly contends that this was a matter which rested solely in the discretion of the trial judge. Escobar v. State, 162 Tex.Cr.R. 115, 282 S.W.2d 873.
The judgment is affirmed.