Case Name: Solomon Rosen, Respondent, v. Gussie Rosen, Defendant. Adolph Feldblum, Attorney for Defendant, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1925-12
Citations: 215 A.D. 785
Docket Number: 
Parties: Solomon Rosen, Respondent, v. Gussie Rosen, Defendant. Adolph Feldblum, Attorney for Defendant, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 215
Pages: 785–785

Head Matter:
Solomon Rosen, Respondent, v. Gussie Rosen, Defendant. Adolph Feldblum, Attorney for Defendant, Appellant.

Opinion:
Order affirmed, without costs. The appellant sought in a perfectly proper way to compel the payment to him of the unpaid portion of an allowance. We find in the circumstances no basis for criticism. The Special Term disagreed with appellant as to the value of bis services, but this did not justify any criticism of the appellant. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jayeox, Manning and Young, JJ., concur.