Case Name: Albert Bradick, Respondent, v. Rudolph H. Deetjen et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1953-10-27
Citations: 282 A.D. 871
Docket Number: 
Parties: Albert Bradick, Respondent, v. Rudolph H. Deetjen et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 282
Pages: 871–871

Head Matter:
Albert Bradick, Respondent, v. Rudolph H. Deetjen et al., Appellants.

Opinion:
To enable plaintiff to substantiate the alleged misrepresentations concerning plaintiff's interest in the firm leading to the settlement and releases, plaintiff is entitled to the items allowed. Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the plain tiff-respondent. Settle order on notice. Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Callahan, Breitel and Bastow, JJ.