Case Name: Mary G. RODGERS, as Administratrix of the Estate of Joshua Garlick, Deceased, Appellant, v. Myles P. O'REILLY, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1955-10-07
Citations: 226 F.2d 176
Docket Number: No. 7045
Parties: Mary G. RODGERS, as Administratrix of the Estate of Joshua Garlick, Deceased, Appellant, v. Myles P. O’REILLY, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 226
Pages: 176–176

Head Matter:
Mary G. RODGERS, as Administratrix of the Estate of Joshua Garlick, Deceased, Appellant, v. Myles P. O’REILLY, Appellee.
No. 7045.
United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.
Argued Oct. 6, 1955.
Decided Oct. 7, 1955.
John Grimball, Columbia, S. C. (William P. Donelan, Columbia, S. C., J. B. Browder and Leaman & Browder, Richmond, Va., on brief), for appellant.
Walter J. Bristow, Jr., Columbia, S. C. (T. Eston Marchant, Jr., Columbia,. S. C., and John P. Moore, Washington, D. C., on brief), for appellee.
Before PARKER, Chief Judge, and SOPER and DOBIE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a judgment for plaintiff in an automobile collision case. The only questions presented by the appeal relate to the sufficiency-of the evidence; but when this is considered in the light most favorable to-the plaintiff, as it must be for the purposes of the appeal, we think that it was unquestionably sufficient. The questions-involved are pure questions of fact; and. we cannot say that reasonable men could not have differed as to the conclusions, to be drawn from the evidence with regard thereto.
Affirmed.