Case Name: Santos Cruz LOPEZ-HERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-09-02
Citations: 75 F. App'x 127
Docket Number: No. 03-1089
Parties: Santos Cruz LOPEZ-HERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 75
Pages: 127–128

Head Matter:
Santos Cruz LOPEZ-HERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 03-1089.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 12, 2003.
Decided Sept. 2, 2003.
Paul S. Haar, Pauline M. Schwartz, Law Offices of Paul S. Haar, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Robert D. McCallum, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richard M. Evans, Assistant Director, Joan E. Smiley, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Before MOTZ, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Santos Cruz Lopez-Hernandez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("Board") denying his motion to reopen deportation proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board's order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Lopez-Hernandez's motion to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1008.2(a) (2003); INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24, 112 S.Ct. 719, 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review on the reasoning of the Board. See In re: Lopez-Hernandez, No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ] (B.I.A. Dec. 17, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.