Case Name: Alex Zanfretti, Respondent, v. Frank Kenebel, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1899-03
Citations: 26 Misc. 839
Docket Number: 
Parties: Alex Zanfretti, Respondent, v. Frank Kenebel, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 26
Pages: 839–840

Head Matter:
Alex Zanfretti, Respondent, v. Frank Kenebel, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of Eew York, borough of Manhattan, for the first district.
Gilbert W. Minor, for appellant.
William E. Cook, for respondent.

Opinion:
Leventritt, J.
There is no question of law involved in this appeal. The appellant invokes a substitution of our judgment for that of the trial justice respecting the weight of evidence. The plaintiff's claim was established by convincing proof. To the extent that the defendant presented satisfactory evidence of his counterclaim, it was allowed and the plaintiff's recovery correspondingly reduced. The record disclosed only positive assertion, emphatic denial and direct contradiction.
In that situation we cannot interfere, as the disposition of the issues was eminently just.
Judgment must be affirmed.
Fbeeuman, P. J., and MaoLean, J., concur.
Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent.