Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Ervin LAMPLEY, Appellant; Ervin LAMPLEY, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1997-10-21
Citations: 955 S.W.2d 219
Docket Number: Nos. 67987, 71618
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Ervin LAMPLEY, Appellant. Ervin LAMPLEY, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before AHRENS, P.J., and CRANDALL and KAROHL, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 955
Pages: 219–219

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Ervin LAMPLEY, Appellant. Ervin LAMPLEY, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 67987, 71618.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Oct. 21, 1997.
Susan McGraugh, St. Louis, for Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Meghan Stephens, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for Respondent.
Before AHRENS, P.J., and CRANDALL and KAROHL, JJ.
Prior report: 859 S.W.2d 909.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant, Ervin Lampley, appeals from judgments of conviction, after a jury trial, of two counts of sodomy of a child less than fourteen years old. The trial court sentenced defendant to two concurrent thirteen year terms of imprisonment.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgments of conviction are affirmed. Rule 30.25.
Defendant also appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion, after an evidentiary hearing. The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value.
The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).