Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael D. NEELY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-07-10
Citations: 571 F. App'x 884
Docket Number: No. 13-15098
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael D. NEELY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 571
Pages: 884–885

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael D. NEELY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-15098
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
July 10, 2014.
Robert G. Davies, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Pensacola, FL, Stephen M. Kunz, As sistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tallahassee, FL, Pamela C. Marsh, Kathryn Dee Risinger, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Panama City, FL, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee.
Michelle Kathleen Spaven, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Panama City, FL, Gwendolyn Louise Spivey, Randolph Patterson Murrell, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Tallahassee, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Gwendolyn Spivey, appointed counsel for Michael D. Neely in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Neely's convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.