Case Name: HOLMES v. CALIFORNIA et al.
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1963-04-15
Citations: 372 U.S. 710
Docket Number: No. 70
Parties: HOLMES v. CALIFORNIA et al.
Judges: Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent for the reasons stated in their opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U. S., at 358, 360.
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 372
Pages: 710–710

Head Matter:
HOLMES v. CALIFORNIA et al.
No. 70, Misc.
Decided April 15, 1963.
Petitioner pro se.
Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, and William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, for respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353.
Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent for the reasons stated in their opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U. S., at 358, 360.
Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.