Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bobby Wayne DEBNAM, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-09-25
Citations: 75 F. App'x 204
Docket Number: No. 02-4997
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bobby Wayne DEBNAM, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 75
Pages: 204–205

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bobby Wayne DEBNAM, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-4997.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 21, 2003.
Decided Sept. 25, 2003.
Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Edwin C. Walker, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Frank D. Whitney, United States Attorney, Anne M. Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Christine Witcover Dean, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Bobby Wayne Debnam appeals the district court's judgment that revoked his supervised release and sentenced him to fifty-one months' imprisonment. Debnam admitted he violated his term of supervised release by being charged with possession with intent to distribute cocaine. On appeal, Debnam does not dispute the violation but asserts his fifty-one month term of imprisonment was plainly unreasonable. We disagree. After being on supervised release for only two months, Debnam was charged with engaging in the very same criminal conduct for which he was convicted. The district court imposed a sentence at the low end of the sentencing guidelines range. We conclude the sentence was not plainly unreasonable and affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions of the parties are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.