Case Name: THOMSON, BOHRER, WERTH & RAZOOK, a Florida general partnership, et al., Appellants, v. MULTI RESTAURANT CONCEPTS, INC., et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-05-01
Citations: 561 So. 2d 615
Docket Number: No. 89-2455
Parties: THOMSON, BOHRER, WERTH & RAZOOK, a Florida general partnership, et al., Appellants, v. MULTI RESTAURANT CONCEPTS, INC., et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before NESBITT, BASKIN and GERSTEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 561
Pages: 615–615

Head Matter:
THOMSON, BOHRER, WERTH & RAZOOK, a Florida general partnership, et al., Appellants, v. MULTI RESTAURANT CONCEPTS, INC., et al., Appellees.
No. 89-2455.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 1, 1990.
Rehearing Denied June 22, 1990.
Joseph P. Averill, Miami, for appellants.
James E. Glass & Associates and James E. Glass, Miami, for appellees.
Before NESBITT, BASKIN and GERSTEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See, e.g., PaineWebber, Inc. v. Hess, 497 So.2d 1323 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Fischer v. Rodriguez-Capriles, 472 So.2d 1315 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Wood-Hopkins Contracting Co. v. C.H. Barco Contracting Co., 301 So.2d 479 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974); G & N Const. Co. v. Kirpatovsky, 181 So.2d 664 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966).
NESBITT and BASKIN, JJ., concur.