Case Name: David CHAPMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doctor TRIPLETT; Al Cannon, Jr., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-08-29
Citations: 142 F. App'x 172
Docket Number: No. 05-6483
Parties: David CHAPMAN, Plaintiff — Appellant, v. Doctor TRIPLETT; Al Cannon, Jr., Defendants — Appellees.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 142
Pages: 172–173

Head Matter:
David CHAPMAN, Plaintiff — Appellant, v. Doctor TRIPLETT; Al Cannon, Jr., Defendants — Appellees.
No. 05-6483.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 12, 2005.
Decided: Aug. 29, 2005.
David Chapman, Appellant pro se. Robert Holmes Hood, Jr., Roy Pearce Maybank, Hood Law Firm, Charleston, South Carolina, Hugh Willcox Buyck, Buyck Law Firm, Charleston, South Carolina, Sandra Jane Senn, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before TRAXLER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
David Chapman appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Chapman v. Triplett, No. CA-04-363-8-18BI (D.S.C. Mar. 14, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED