Case Name: Nathan Silberberg Galleries, Ltd., Appellant, v. Holmes Protection of New York, Inc., Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1994-09-29
Citations: 84 N.Y.2d 859
Docket Number: 
Parties: Nathan Silberberg Galleries, Ltd., Appellant, v Holmes Protection of New York, Inc., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 84
Pages: 859–860

Head Matter:
[642 NE2d 321, 618 NYS2d 3]
Nathan Silberberg Galleries, Ltd., Appellant, v Holmes Protection of New York, Inc., Respondent.
Decided September 29, 1994
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Jafiin, Conrad & Finkelstein, New York City (Martin L. Conrad and Herbert L. Finkelstein of counsel), for appellant.
Conway, Farrell, Curtin & Kelly, P. C, New York City (Jonathan T. Uejio of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, and certified question answered in the affirmative (see, Gutter Furs v Jewelers Protection Servs., 79 NY2d 1027; Sommer v Federal Signal Corp., 79 NY2d 540, 554).
Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick.