Case Name: Charles SMITH, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2015-02-03
Citations: 453 S.W.3d 862
Docket Number: ED 101233
Parties: Charles SMITH, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 453
Pages: 862–863

Head Matter:
Charles SMITH, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
ED 101233
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Filed: February 3, 2015
Andrew E. Zleit, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for Mov-ant/Appellant.
Andrew C. Hooper, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for Respondent/Respondent.
Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Charles Smith appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Brooks v. State, 242 S.W.3d 705, 708 (Mo.banc 2008). An extended opinion would have no. precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. 2013, unless otherwise indicated.