Case Name: Wilputte Coke Oven Corporation v. Runyan
Court: Appellate Court of Indiana
Jurisdiction: Indiana
Decision Date: 1945-01-17
Citations: 115 Ind. App. 284
Docket Number: No. 17,328
Parties: Wilputte Coke Oven Corporation v. Runyan
Judges: 
Reporter: Indiana Court of Appeals Reports
Volume: 115
Pages: 284–285

Head Matter:
Wilputte Coke Oven Corporation v. Runyan
[No. 17,328.
Filed January 17, 1945.]
Oscar C. Strom, of Gary, for appellant.
John M. Huberto, of Gary, for appellee.

Opinion:
Flanagan, J.
— This is an appeal from an award of the Industrial Board. The only question involved is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the Board's finding-in certain particulars.
In setting forth a condensed recital of the evidence in its brief, appellant has set forth from the testimony of each witness all of that which is favorable to it but omitted most of that which is unfavorable. This does not constitute a good-faith effort to comply with the rule of this court in regard to setting forth a condensed recital of the evidence. Rule 2-17 (e), Rules of the Supreme Court. No question is therefore presented for our consideration.
Under the circumstances we feel that the maximum penalty should be applied.
While the award is affirmed and the penalty attached for the reason above given, we may state that we have nevertheless examined the record and find the evidence ample to support the finding of the Board.
Award affirmed with increase of 10%.
Draper, C. J., not participating.
Note. — Reported in 58 N. E. (2d) 762.