Case Name: Al Maajid MUHAMMAD EL, on behalf of his two minor children, Hasan MUHAMMAD EL and Ashanti Muhammad El, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARYLAND STATE BOARD OF LAW EXAMINERS, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-02-04
Citations: 86 F. App'x 600
Docket Number: No. 03-2157
Parties: Al Maajid MUHAMMAD EL, on behalf of his two minor children, Hasan MUHAMMAD EL and Ashanti Muhammad El, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. MARYLAND STATE BOARD OF LAW EXAMINERS, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 86
Pages: 600–600

Head Matter:
Al Maajid MUHAMMAD EL, on behalf of his two minor children, Hasan MUHAMMAD EL and Ashanti Muhammad El, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. MARYLAND STATE BOARD OF LAW EXAMINERS, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 03-2157.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 29, 2004.
Decided Feb. 4, 2004.
A1 Maajid Muhammad El, Appellant pro se.
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
A1 Maajid Muhammad El appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) and RICO complaints under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find the appeal fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Muhammad El v. Maryland State Bd. of Law Exam'rs., CA-03-2366 (D.Md. Aug. 25, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED