Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael O'SHAUGHNESSY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1985-08-30
Citations: 772 F.2d 111
Docket Number: No. 85-2360
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael O’SHAUGHNESSY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 772
Pages: 111–112

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael O’SHAUGHNESSY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 85-2360.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 30, 1985.
Roland E. Dahlin, II, Thomas S. Berg, Houston, Tex., for defendant-appellant.
Henry K. Oncken, U.S. Atty., James R. Gough, Jr., James J. Powers, Asst. U.S. Attys., Houston, Tex., Ann Wallace, Atty., Crim. Division, Dept, of Justice, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellee.
ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion 06/18/85, 5 Cir., 1985, 764 F.2d 1035)
Before RUBIN, RANDALL and TATE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Treating the suggestion for rehearing en banc as a petition for panel rehearing, it is ordered that the petition for panel rehearing is GRANTED. It is further ordered that supplemental briefing be on an expedited basis with the schedule to be set by the Clerk. The case will be assigned to the first available oral argument calendar after briefing.