Case Name: GENERAL AMERICAN TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION, et al., Petitioners, v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION, United States of America, Respondents, Lo Shippers Action Committee, Baltimore and Ohio Chicago Terminal Railroad Co., U.S. Clay Producers Traffic Association, Inc., Association of American Railroads, Chemical Manufacturers Association, Intervenors; RAILWAY PROGRESS INSTITUTE COMMITTEE ON TANK CARS, Petitioners, v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION and United States of America, Respondents, Association of American Railroads, Baltimore and Ohio Chicago Terminal Railroad Co., et al., Chemical Manufacturers Association, MBF Industries, Inc., Intervenors; RAILWAY PROGRESS INSTITUTE COMMITTEE ON TANK CARS, et al., Petitioners, v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION and United States of America, Respondents, Association of American Railroads, Baltimore and Ohio Chicago Terminal Railroad Co., et al., Intervenors
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1989-06-30
Citations: 883 F.2d 1029
Docket Number: Nos. 87-1125, 87-1171 and 88-1284
Parties: GENERAL AMERICAN TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION, et al., Petitioners, v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION, United States of America, Respondents, Lo Shippers Action Committee, Baltimore and Ohio Chicago Terminal Railroad Co., U.S. Clay Producers Traffic Association, Inc., Association of American Railroads, Chemical Manufacturers Association, Intervenors. RAILWAY PROGRESS INSTITUTE COMMITTEE ON TANK CARS, Petitioners, v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION and United States of America, Respondents, Association of American Railroads, Baltimore and Ohio Chicago Terminal Railroad Co., et al., Chemical Manufacturers Association, MBF Industries, Inc., Intervenors. RAILWAY PROGRESS INSTITUTE COMMITTEE ON TANK CARS, et al., Petitioners, v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION and United States of America, Respondents, Association of American Railroads, Baltimore and Ohio Chicago Terminal Railroad Co., et al., Intervenors.
Judges: Before SILBERMAN, WILLIAMS and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 883
Pages: 1029–1031

Head Matter:
GENERAL AMERICAN TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION, et al., Petitioners, v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION, United States of America, Respondents, Lo Shippers Action Committee, Baltimore and Ohio Chicago Terminal Railroad Co., U.S. Clay Producers Traffic Association, Inc., Association of American Railroads, Chemical Manufacturers Association, Intervenors. RAILWAY PROGRESS INSTITUTE COMMITTEE ON TANK CARS, Petitioners, v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION and United States of America, Respondents, Association of American Railroads, Baltimore and Ohio Chicago Terminal Railroad Co., et al., Chemical Manufacturers Association, MBF Industries, Inc., Intervenors. RAILWAY PROGRESS INSTITUTE COMMITTEE ON TANK CARS, et al., Petitioners, v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION and United States of America, Respondents, Association of American Railroads, Baltimore and Ohio Chicago Terminal Railroad Co., et al., Intervenors.
Nos. 87-1125, 87-1171 and 88-1284.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
June 30, 1989.
Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc Denied June 30, 1989.

Opinion:
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING OF PETITIONERS AND INTERVENORS
Before SILBERMAN, WILLIAMS and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the petition for rehearing of petitioners and intervenors, filed May 26, 1989, it is
ORDERED, by the Court, that the petition is denied.