Case Name: William J. DOCKERAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kelly DIXION, Assistant Warden; Unknown No. 3; FNU Simpson; M. Wooten; FNU Harmon, Lieutenant; Unknown No. 4; FNU Garcia, Mailroom Supervisor, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-07-26
Citations: 192 F. App'x 271
Docket Number: No. 04-41305
Parties: William J. DOCKERAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kelly DIXION, Assistant Warden; Unknown No. 3; FNU Simpson; M. Wooten; FNU Harmon, Lieutenant; Unknown No. 4; FNU Garcia, Mailroom Supervisor, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before JONES, Chief Judge, DeMOSS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 192
Pages: 271–272

Head Matter:
William J. DOCKERAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kelly DIXION, Assistant Warden; Unknown No. 3; FNU Simpson; M. Wooten; FNU Harmon, Lieutenant; Unknown No. 4; FNU Garcia, Mailroom Supervisor, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 04-41305
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
July 26, 2006.
William J. Dockeray, Jr., Dallas, TX, pro se.
Before JONES, Chief Judge, DeMOSS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
William J. Dockeray, Texas prisoner # 563359, has been barred from proceeding in forma pauperis ("IFP") under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) because, on at least three prior occasions while incarcerated, he has brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed as frivolous or for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. See Dockeray v. Ozz, 105 FedAppx. 609 (5th Cir.2004) (unpublished). This appeal was therefore improvidently docketed as if Dockeray were proceeding IFP on appeal.
Accordingly, Dockeray's IFP status is DECERTIFIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED. Dockeray has 15 days from the date of this opinion to pay the full appellate filing fee to the clerk of the district court, should he wish to reinstate his appeal.
IFP DECERTIFIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.