Case Name: The State, ex rel. Muddiman, Appellant, v. Carlisle Corporation et al., Appellees
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1991-12-24
Citations: 62 Ohio St. 3d 309
Docket Number: No. 90-66
Parties: The State, ex rel. Muddiman, Appellant, v. Carlisle Corporation et al., Appellees.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 62
Pages: 309–310

Head Matter:
The State, ex rel. Muddiman, Appellant, v. Carlisle Corporation et al., Appellees.
[Cite as State, ex rel. Muddiman, v. Carlisle Corp. (1991), 62 Ohio St.3d 809.]
(No. 90-66
Submitted October 23, 1990
Decided December 24, 1991.)
Michael J. Muldoon, for appellant.
Thrasher, Dinsmore & Dolan and Lawrence J. Dolan, for appellee Carlisle Corporation.
Lee I. Fisher, Attorney General, and Michael L. Squillace, for appellee Industrial Commission.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Based on our decision in State, ex rel. Noll, v. Indus. Comm. (1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 203, 567 N.E.2d 245, the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed and a limited writ is issued ordering the commission to identify the nonmedical disability factors relied on and to briefly explain its decision.
Judgment reversed and limited writ issued.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Holmes, J., dissents.
Holmes, J., dissenting. I would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.