Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark WRIGHT, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-10-25
Citations: 544 F. App'x 224
Docket Number: No. 13-7071
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark WRIGHT, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 544
Pages: 224–225

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark WRIGHT, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-7071.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 21, 2013.
Decided: Oct. 25, 2013.
Mark Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Mark Wright appeals the district court's order denying his motion for specific performance to compel the Government to file a motion under Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Wright, No. 4:11-cr- 00078-TLW-9 (D.S.C. May 10, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.