Case Name: Hood, Appellant, v. Norton
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1902-03-24
Citations: 202 Pa. 119
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 113
Parties: Hood, Appellant, v. Norton.
Judges: Before McCollum, C. J., Mitchell, Dean, Fell, Brown, Mestrezat and Potter, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 202
Pages: 119–120

Head Matter:
Hood, Appellant, v. Norton.
March 24, 1902:
Argued Jan. 23, 1892.
Appeal, No. 113, Jan. T., 1901, by plaintiff, from orders of C. P. No. 1, Phila. Co., June T., 1892, M. L. D. 209, making absolute rules to strike off names of terretenants and to set aside tbe service of scire facias on terre-tenants in case of James Hood to use of Joseph McCloskey v. Albert E. Norton, Sallie W. Howes, Louisa E. Smith, Ellery B. Folger, Henry Tatnall, Howard B. Arrison and Mary E. Hugbes.
Before McCollum, C. J., Mitchell, Dean, Fell, Brown, Mestrezat and Potter, JJ.

Opinion:
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Brown,
Tbe questions raised on this appeal have been considered and passed upon in the case of Hood to the use of McCloskey v. Albert E. Norton et al., January term, 1901, No. 111, and, for the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, this day filed, the order of the court below is affirmed, with costs.