Case Name: Clotilde C. JIMENEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.; Shapiro & Brown, LLP, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-03-09
Citations: 678 F. App'x 181
Docket Number: No. 16-1926
Parties: Clotilde C. JIMENEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.; Shapiro & Brown, LLP, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before THACKER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 678
Pages: 181–181

Head Matter:
Clotilde C. JIMENEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.; Shapiro & Brown, LLP, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-1926
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: January 10, 2017
Decided: March 9, 2017
Clotilde C. Jimenez, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Montgomery Barnwell, Matthew Douglas Patterson, NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, LLP, Columbia, South Carolina, Nathan Ira Brown, NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, LLP, Huntington, West Virginia, Sarah Reimers Mclntee, NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Before THACKER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Clotilde C. Jimenez appeals the district court's order granting Defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jimenez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 1:16-cv-00624-CMH-MSN, 2016 WL 4059161 (E.D. Va. filed July 26, 2016; entered July 27, 2016). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED