Case Name: David TOMASELLO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORTH ARKANSAS WHOLESALE, INC.; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-04-21
Citations: 274 F. App'x 576
Docket Number: No. 07-16704
Parties: David TOMASELLO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORTH ARKANSAS WHOLESALE, INC.; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 274
Pages: 576–577

Head Matter:
David TOMASELLO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORTH ARKANSAS WHOLESALE, INC.; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
No. 07-16704.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 15, 2008.
Filed April 21, 2008.
David Tomasello, Tonopah, AZ, pro se.
Steven Greogry Biddle, Esq., Emily M. Craiger, Esq., Littler Mendelson, PC, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: B. FLETCHER, FISHER and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
This is an appeal from the district court's order granting defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiffs complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).
The court has received and reviewed appellant's response to the court's February 15, 2008 order to show cause and appellees' response thereto. A review of the record and these responses indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per cu-riam) (stating standard).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment.
All pending motions are denied as moot.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.