Case Name: GEORGE TRENOUTH et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT, etc., et al., Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1924-02-21
Citations: 193 Cal. 330
Docket Number: S. F. No. 11038
Parties: GEORGE TRENOUTH et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT, etc., et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Reports
Volume: 193
Pages: 330–330

Head Matter:
[S. F. No. 11038.
In Bank.
February 21, 1924.]
GEORGE TRENOUTH et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT, etc., et al., Respondents.
Appeal—Application for Writ of Certiorari—Denial—Review.— Where petitioners applied to the district court of appeal for a writ of certiorari, which was denied, the appropriate procedure for a review under the rules of the supreme court is an application to the latter court for a rehearing before it upon said petition and the order of the district court of appeal denying it.
APPLICATION for a Writ of Certiorari to review an order of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County substituting a party plaintiff. P. F. Gosbey, Judge.
Writ denied.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
John W. Sullivan for Petitioners.

Opinion:
THE COURT.
The petition is denied. The petitioner having applied to the district court of appeal for a similar writ, which petition was by said court denied, the appropriate procedure under the rules of this court is that of an application for a rehearing in this court upon said petition and the order of the district court of appeal denying the same.