Case Name: Tanyin B. HOLLEY, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ricardo BRICKERS, Deputy; Antonio Tolbert, Deputy, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-02-22
Citations: 466 F. App'x 199
Docket Number: No. 11-7372
Parties: Tanyin B. HOLLEY, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ricardo BRICKERS, Deputy; Antonio Tolbert, Deputy, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 466
Pages: 199–200

Head Matter:
Tanyin B. HOLLEY, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ricardo BRICKERS, Deputy; Antonio Tolbert, Deputy, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 11-7372.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 16, 2012.
Decided: Feb. 22, 2012.
Tanyin B. Holley, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Lawrence Dumville, Norris & St. Clair, P.C., Virginia Beach, VA, for Appellees.
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Tanyin B. Holley, Sr. appeals the district court's order granting the Defendants' motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Holley v. Brickers, No. 1:10-cv-1205GBL-TRJ, 2011 WL 4498992 (E.D.Va. Sept. 26, 2011). We deny Holley's pending motion for leave to file an amended complaint. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
We note that we have considered the merits of Holley's deliberate indifference claim, but find no reversible error in the district court's adjudication of it.