Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher Ray-Bryan ROGERS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-03-19
Citations: 598 F. App'x 188
Docket Number: No. 14-4767
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher Ray-Bryan ROGERS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WYNN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 598
Pages: 188–189

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher Ray-Bryan ROGERS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 14-4767.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 17, 2015.
Decided: March 19, 2015.
Michael A. Meetze, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellant. William N. Nettles, United States Attorney, Robert Frank Daley, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WYNN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
In accordance with a written plea agreement, Christopher Ray-Bryan Rogers pled guilty to possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (2012). Rogers was sentenced as an armed career criminal to 200 months in prison. He now appeals, claiming that the district court erred when it increased his term of imprisonment based upon prior convictions that were neither alleged in the indictment nor found by a jury. Rogers concedes, however, that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). We are "bound by Almendarez-Torres unless and until the Supreme Court says otherwise." United States v. Graham, 711 F.3d 445, 455 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 134 S.Ct. 449, 187 L.Ed.2d 300 (2013). The Supreme Court has not overruled Almenda-rez-Torres.
We accordingly affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.