Case Name: Hugh D. GRAVES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-06-01
Citations: 136 S.W.3d 525
Docket Number: No. ED 83222
Parties: Hugh D. GRAVES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 136
Pages: 525–525

Head Matter:
Hugh D. GRAVES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 83222.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
June 1, 2004.
Maleaner Ryna Harvey, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Charnette Douglass, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Hugh D. Graves (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without a hearing. Movant asserts his plea counsel was ineffective for failing to inform him that he was subject to an extended range of punishment as a prior and persistent offender.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court's decision is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).