Case Name: In the Matter of Michael Cipollaro, Petitioner, v. New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2012-12-13
Citations: 101 A.D.3d 508
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Michael Cipollaro, Petitioner, v New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 101
Pages: 508–508

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Michael Cipollaro, Petitioner, v New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, Respondent.
[954 NYS2d 877]

Opinion:
Respondent's determination was supported by substantial evidence (see generally 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 180-181 [1978]). There exists no basis to disturb the credibility determinations of the administrative law judge (see Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436, 443-444 [1987]). Moreover, petitioner's argument that he did not have fair warning that the area where he was pulled over and ticketed was not a designated truck route, is unpreserved as it was not raised at the administrative hearing (see Matter of Palette v City of New York, 208 AD2d 427 [1st Dept 1994], lv denied 85 NY2d 803 [1995]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Sweeny, Moskowitz, Renwick and Clark, JJ.