Case Name: Carl Kenneth FRAZIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2007-04-20
Citations: 957 So. 2d 31
Docket Number: No. 5D06-1520
Parties: Carl Kenneth FRAZIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: GRIFFIN, THOMPSON and MONACO, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 957
Pages: 31–32

Head Matter:
Carl Kenneth FRAZIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D06-1520.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
April 20, 2007.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Brynn Newton, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Ap-pellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See San Martin v. State, 717 So.2d 462, 470-71 (noting evidentiary rulings cannot be disturbed absent abuse of discretion); Singleton v. State, 783 So.2d 970, 976 (Fla.2001) (holding that, where counsel did not raise below as grounds for objection the issue argued on appeal, the issue was not preserved for review).
GRIFFIN, THOMPSON and MONACO, JJ., concur.