Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Earl Williams, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2003-04-07
Citations: 304 A.D.2d 595
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Earl Williams, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 304
Pages: 595–596

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Earl Williams, Appellant.
[759 NYS2d 329]

Opinion:
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (McCann, J.), rendered July 3, 2001, convicting him of assault in the first degree, criminal mischief in the fourth degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the People failed to disprove his defense of justification by legally sufficient evidence is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Boyle, 289 AD2d 251 [2001]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to disprove the defendant's defense of justification beyond a reasonable doubt. The consistent and credible testimony of the People's witnesses placed the defendant as the initial aggressor of the attack which caused serious physical injury to the complainant (see People v Hogencamp, 296 AD2d 662, 663 [2002]; People v Young, 240 AD2d 974, 976 [1997]; People v Spinelli, 165 AD2d 888 [1990]). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).
The defendant's remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review, and, in any event, is without merit. Altman, J.P., Smith, McGinity and Crane, JJ., concur.