Case Name: Arpi Koulajian, Appellant, v. Tamara Smith et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2013-05-02
Citations: 21 N.Y.3d 918
Docket Number: 
Parties: Arpi Koulajian, Appellant, v Tamara Smith et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 21
Pages: 918–919

Head Matter:
[988 NE2d 1285, 966 NYS2d 773]
Arpi Koulajian, Appellant, v Tamara Smith et al., Respondents.
Decided May 2, 2013
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Law Office of Robert F. Danzi, Westbury (Robert F. Danzi of counsel), for appellant.
DeSena & Sweeney, LLP, Bohemia (Shawn P. O’Shaughnessy of counsel), for respondents.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs. The Appellate Division correctly held that defendants were entitled to summary judgment.
Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Rivera.