Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Sergio Samuel RODRIGUEZ-ESPARZA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-04-20
Citations: 645 F. App'x 343
Docket Number: No. 15-41153
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Sergio Samuel RODRIGUEZ-ESPARZA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before REAVLEY, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 645
Pages: 343–343

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Sergio Samuel RODRIGUEZ-ESPARZA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-41153
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 20, 2016.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Timothy William Crooks, Assistant Federal Public Defender, H. Michael Soko-low, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Sergio Samuel Rodríguez-Esparza, Humble, TX, pro se.
Before REAVLEY, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Sergio Samuel Rodríguez-Es-parza has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.O. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Rodriguez-Esparza has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cm. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.