Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Agapito CORTEZ, aka Tito, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-12-10
Citations: 52 F. App'x 388
Docket Number: No. 01-50702; D.C. No. CR-96-00567-ABC-2
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Agapito CORTEZ, aka Tito, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before GOODWIN, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 52
Pages: 388–388

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Agapito CORTEZ, aka Tito, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 01-50702.
D.C. No. CR-96-00567-ABC-2.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 2, 2002.
Decided Dec. 10, 2002.
Before GOODWIN, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Agapito Cortez appeals from the sentence imposed after remand, for his conviction by jury trial for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846(a)(1).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Cortez's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no meritorious issues for review, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Cortez has not filed a supplemental pro se brief.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988) discloses no issues for review. Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.