Case Name: Ronnie STEWART; et al., Appellants, and Alan L. Gluth; et al., Plaintiffs, v. Samuel A. LEWIS; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-10-11
Citations: 48 F. App'x 665
Docket Number: Nos. 00-16305, 00-16307; D.C. No. CV-84-01626-PGR
Parties: Ronnie STEWART; et al., Appellants, and Alan L. Gluth; et al., Plaintiffs, v. Samuel A. LEWIS; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 48
Pages: 665–666

Head Matter:
Ronnie STEWART; et al., Appellants, and Alan L. Gluth; et al., Plaintiffs, v. Samuel A. LEWIS; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Nos. 00-16305, 00-16307.
D.C. No. CV-84-01626-PGR.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 7, 2002.
Decided Oct. 11, 2002.
Before FERNANDEZ, GRABER, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Five Arizona state prisoners appeal pro se the district court's March 27, 2000 order entering a stipulated Modified Permanent Injunction, which modified the injunction previously entered to ensure prisoners at the Arizona State Prison at Florence were provided meaningful access to the courts. While this appeal was pending the district court terminated the Modified Permanent Injunction. We therefore dismiss this appeal as moot. See Mayweathers v. Newland, 258 F.3d 930, 935-36 (9th Cir.2001).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.