Case Name: Peter BRUNETTI, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-02-06
Citations: 594 So. 2d 291
Docket Number: No. 78535
Parties: Peter BRUNETTI, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: SHAW, C.J. and OVERTON, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 594
Pages: 291–291

Head Matter:
Peter BRUNETTI, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 78535.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Feb. 6, 1992.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender and Allen J. DeWeese, Asst. Public Defender, Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, West Palm Beach, for petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Joan Fowler, Bureau Chief, Sr. Asst. Atty. Gen., and Jacqueline Barakat, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent.

Opinion:
McDonald, judge.
We review Brunetti v. State, 583 So.2d 1040 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), because, in an unpublished order dated August 22, 1991, the district court granted Brunetti's motion to certify the following question as being of great public importance:
Do Instruction 3.04(c)(2), Florida Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases, and Section 777.201(2), Florida Statutes (1989), both applicable to offenses after 1987, unconstitutionally shift the burden to the defense to prove entrapment?
We recently answered this question in the negative. Herrera v. State, 594 So.2d 275 (Fla.1992). Therefore, we approve Brunet-ti.
It is so ordered.
SHAW, C.J. and OVERTON, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.
BARKETT, J., concurs in result only.