Case Name: K.H. and D.A.H., Both Individually and as Parents of A.H. v. J.R. and N.R. Petition of: J.R. @ 706 MAL 2001. Petition of: N.R @ 720 MAL 2001
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2002-08-13
Citations: 569 Pa. 235
Docket Number: Appeal Nos. 706 & 720 MAL 2001
Parties: K.H. and D.A.H., Both Individually and as Parents of A.H. v. J.R. and N.R. Petition of: J.R. @ 706 MAL 2001. Petition of: N.R @ 720 MAL 2001.
Judges: 
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 569
Pages: 235–235

Head Matter:
803 A.2d 1175
K.H. and D.A.H., Both Individually and as Parents of A.H. v. J.R. and N.R. Petition of: J.R. @ 706 MAL 2001. Petition of: N.R @ 720 MAL 2001.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Aug. 13, 2002.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 13th day of August, 2002, the Petitions for Allowance of Appeal are hereby GRANTED, LIMITED to the following issues:
a. Whether Appellees, who sought review of an order granting summary judgment and an order denying post-trial motions, were required to file separate notices of appeal?
b. Whether Joseph Reith, a non-custodial parent with shared custody of his son, had a duty to supervise him pursuant to Section 316 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts?
c. Whether a verdict of $4,625, awarded solely for pain and suffering, was inadequate as bearing no reasonable relation to the loss suffered?