Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lanny Gold ARBUCCI, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1969-10-10
Citations: 416 F.2d 1332
Docket Number: No. 27832
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lanny Gold ARBUCCI, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 416
Pages: 1332–1332

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lanny Gold ARBUCCI, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 27832
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
Oct. 10, 1969.
Richard D. Naylor, Pecos, Tex., for defendant-appellant.
Seagal V. Wheatley, United States Atty., San Antonio, Tex., Romualdo Cesar Caballero, Asst. U. S. Atty., El Paso, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before GEWIN, DYER and CARS-WELL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Arbucci appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury conviction of aiding and abetting the transportation in interstate commerce of a stolen automobile in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 2312. We affirm.
Although Arbucci insists that the District Judge improperly charged the jury on the issue of "aiding and abetting" and erroneously refused instructions submitted by him, we have considered the charge as a whole and have concluded that no prejudicial error is contained therein. Gurleski v. United States, 5 Cir. 1968, 405 F.2d 253; United States v. Birnbaum, 2 Cir. 1967, 373 F.2d 250, cert. denied, 389 U.S. 837, 88 S.Ct. 53, 19 L.Ed.2d 99. The judgment is therefore affirmed.
. Pursuant to new Rule 18 of the Rules of this Court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the cleric to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir. 1969, 409 F.2d 804.