Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Jennifer Lynnette FURLONG, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-09-03
Citations: 391 F. App'x 570
Docket Number: No. 10-1945
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Jennifer Lynnette FURLONG, Appellant.
Judges: Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 391
Pages: 570–571

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Jennifer Lynnette FURLONG, Appellant.
No. 10-1945.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 1, 2010.
Filed: Sept. 3, 2010.
Troy K. Stabenow, Asst. Fed. Public Defender, Jefferson City, MO (Raymond C. Conrad, Jr., Fed. Public Defender, Kansas City, MO, on the brief), for appellant.
Jim Y. Lynn, Asst. U.S. Atty., Jefferson City, MO, for appellee.
Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Jennifer Furlong challenges the 39-month sentence the district court imposed after she pleaded guilty to three counts of access-device fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a)(2), and three counts of identity theft, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028A. Her counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), challenging the reasonableness of the sentence.
We conclude that the district court committed no procedural error and imposed a substantively reasonable sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007) (in reviewing sentence, appellate court first ensures that district court committed no significant procedural error, then considers substantive reasonableness of sentence under abuse-of-discretion standard; if sentence is within applicable Guidelines range, appellate court may apply presumption of reasonableness); United States v. Haack, 403 F.3d 997, 1004 (8th Cir.2005) (describing abuse of discretion).
Having reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we have found no non-frivolous issues. Accordingly, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw, and we affirm.
. The Honorable Nanette K. Laughrey, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.