Case Name: Bobby L. COMPTON, Sr., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NEW RIVER VALLEY REGIONAL JAIL; New River Valley Regional Jail, Medical Department; Donnie Simpkins, Superintendent; Joyce Giampressro, Head Nurse; Frederick Moses, Doctor; J.B. Jackson, Major, Defendants - Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-01-30
Citations: 215 F. App'x 244
Docket Number: No. 06-7452
Parties: Bobby L. COMPTON, Sr., Plaintiff — Appellant, v. NEW RIVER VALLEY REGIONAL JAIL; New River Valley Regional Jail, Medical Department; Donnie Simpkins, Superintendent; Joyce Giampressro, Head Nurse; Frederick Moses, Doctor; J.B. Jackson, Major, Defendants — Appellees.
Judges: Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 215
Pages: 244–245

Head Matter:
Bobby L. COMPTON, Sr., Plaintiff — Appellant, v. NEW RIVER VALLEY REGIONAL JAIL; New River Valley Regional Jail, Medical Department; Donnie Simpkins, Superintendent; Joyce Giampressro, Head Nurse; Frederick Moses, Doctor; J.B. Jackson, Major, Defendants — Appellees.
No. 06-7452.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 25, 2007.
Decided: Jan. 30, 2007.
Bobby L. Compton, Appellant Pro Se. Jim Harold Guynn, Jr., Guynn, Memmer & Dillon, PC, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Bobby L. Compton, Sr., appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Compton v. New River Valley Regional Jail, No. 7:06-cv-00241-sgw-mf, 2006 WL 2336464 (W.D.Va. Aug. 10, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.