Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Mark L. FLAAEN, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-12-07
Citations: 440 F. App'x 516
Docket Number: No. 11-2651
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Mark L. FLAAEN, Appellant.
Judges: Before LOKEN, BYE, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 440
Pages: 516–516

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Mark L. FLAAEN, Appellant.
No. 11-2651.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 23, 2011.
Filed: Dec. 7, 2011.
Anita L. Burns, Asst. Fed. Public Defender, Kansas City, MO (Raymond C. Conrad, Jr., Fed. Public Defender, on the brief), for appellant.
Mark L. Flaaen, Coleman, FL, pro se.
Rudolph R. Rhodes IV, Asst. U.S. Atty., Kansas City, MO, for appellee.
Before LOKEN, BYE, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Mark Flaaen appeals the sentence the district court imposed after revoking his supervised release. We conclude that the revocation sentence of 20 months in prison with 40 months of supervised release was not unreasonable. We decline to review at this time Flaaen's arguments regarding ineffective assistance of counsel and sentence credit. See United States v. Davis, 452 F.3d 991, 994 (8th Cir.2006); United States v. Pardue, 363 F.3d 695, 699 (8th Cir.2004). With respect to Flaaen's remaining arguments, we find no plain error. See Davis, 452 F.3d at 994 (describing plain-error review); see also United States v. Asalati, 615 F.3d 1001, 1007-08 (8th Cir.2010) (upholding curfew condition of supervised release).
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court, and we grant counsel's motion to withdraw.
. The Honorable Dean Whipple, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.