Case Name: Todd V. CAMPBELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VERIZON VIRGINIA, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee, and Verizon Communications, Incorporated, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-06-18
Citations: 474 F. App'x 167
Docket Number: No. 11-2112
Parties: Todd V. CAMPBELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VERIZON VIRGINIA, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee, and Verizon Communications, Incorporated, Defendant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 474
Pages: 167–168

Head Matter:
Todd V. CAMPBELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VERIZON VIRGINIA, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee, and Verizon Communications, Incorporated, Defendant.
No. 11-2112.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 11, 2012.
Decided: June 18, 2012.
W. Barry Montgomery, Kalbaugh, Pfund & Messersmith, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Stephanie Ploszay Earn, Briton K. Nelson, McGUIRE-WOODS LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Ap-pellee.
Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Todd V. Campbell appeals the magistrate judge's order granting summary judgment on his interference and retaliation claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Campbell v. Verizon Va., Inc., 812 F.Supp.2d 748 (E.D.Va.2011) We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
With the consent of the parties, the magistrate judge exercised jurisdiction over this litigation, as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) (2006).