Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hector Camirlo ESPINOZA-GUIDO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-10-31
Citations: 699 F. App'x 920
Docket Number: No. 17-10878 Non-Argument Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hector Camirlo ESPINOZA-GUIDO, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MARCUS, ROSENBAUM and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 699
Pages: 920–920

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hector Camirlo ESPINOZA-GUIDO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 17-10878 Non-Argument Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
(October 31, 2017)
Peter J. Sholl, Arthur Lee Bentley, III, Jennifer Lynn Peresie, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Howard C. Anderson, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Tampa, FL, Donna Lee Elm, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Orlando, FL, for Defendant-Appellant
Before MARCUS, ROSENBAUM and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Rosemary Cakmis, appointed counsel for Hector Espinoza-Guido in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Espinoza-Guido's conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.