Case Name: Arthur O. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William L. OSTEEN, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-02-13
Citations: 3 F. App'x 106
Docket Number: No. 00-2519
Parties: Arthur O. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William L. OSTEEN, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINS, DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 3
Pages: 106–107

Head Matter:
Arthur O. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William L. OSTEEN, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 00-2519.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 8, 2001.
Decided Feb. 13, 2001.
Arthur O. Armstrong, pro se.
Before WILKINS, DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Arthur 0. Armstrong appeals the district court's order denying his motion for leave to file a complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Armstrong v. Osteen, No. MISC-00-108-1 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 20, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.