Case Name: DAVIES v. SLIDELL; HUPPENBAUR v. SLIDELL; AMES v. SLIDELL'S HEIRS; SAME v. SAME
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1876-11-27
Citations: 154 U.S. 625
Docket Number: Nos. 417, 435, 668 and 669
Parties: DAVIES v. SLIDELL. HUPPENBAUR v. SLIDELL. AMES v. SLIDELL’S HEIRS. SAME v. SAME.
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 154
Pages: 625–626

Head Matter:
DAVIES v. SLIDELL. HUPPENBAUR v. SLIDELL. AMES v. SLIDELL’S HEIRS. SAME v. SAME.
ERROR. TO THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA.
Nos. 417, 435, 668 and 669.
Submitted November 20, 1876.
Decided November 27, 1876.
Affirmed upon the authority of Bigelow v. Forrest, 9 Wall. 339; Day v. Micou, 18 Wall. 156; and Wallach v. Van Biswick, 92 U. S. 202.

Opinion:
Mr. Chief Justice Waite
delivered the opinion of the court.
We are not inclined to hear a re-argument of the Federal ques fcions presented by the records in these cases. They were decided in Bigelow v. Forrest, 9 Wall. 339; Day v. Micou, 18 Wall. 156; and Wallach v. Van Riswick, 92 U. U. 202. The court below lias followed these decisions, with which we are entirely satisfied.
Mr. L. Madison Day, Mr. D. C. Labalt, Mr. T. J. Durant and Mr., Charles W. Hornor for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. Thomas Allen Clarke for defendants in error.
W$, therefore, affirm the judgment in each of the several cases, under the practice authorized by the amendment to Rule 6, section . 3, promulgated at the last term. Affirmed