Case Name: Terell MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Valerie PARHAM, Laundry Supervisor; Diane Dale, Counselor; T. Barrett, Registered Nurse; Wendell W. Pixley, Warden; Lt. West, Lieutenant; Tracy S. Ray, Warden; Dr. Wyatt Ruffin, DDS, Dentist; Mayhue, Dental Assistant, Defendants-Appellees, and R. Clayton, Registered Nurse; O. Jones, Correctional Officer, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-08-29
Citations: 696 F. App'x 661
Docket Number: No. 17-6531
Parties: Terell MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Valerie PARHAM, Laundry Supervisor; Diane Dale, Counselor; T. Barrett, Registered Nurse; Wendell W. Pixley, Warden; Lt. West, Lieutenant; Tracy S. Ray, Warden; Dr. Wyatt Ruffin, DDS, Dentist; Mayhue, Dental Assistant, Defendants-Appellees, and R. Clayton, Registered Nurse; O. Jones, Correctional Officer, Defendants.
Judges: Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 696
Pages: 661–662

Head Matter:
Terell MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Valerie PARHAM, Laundry Supervisor; Diane Dale, Counselor; T. Barrett, Registered Nurse; Wendell W. Pixley, Warden; Lt. West, Lieutenant; Tracy S. Ray, Warden; Dr. Wyatt Ruffin, DDS, Dentist; Mayhue, Dental Assistant, Defendants-Appellees, and R. Clayton, Registered Nurse; O. Jones, Correctional Officer, Defendants.
No. 17-6531
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: August 24, 2017
Decided: August 29, 2017
Terell Moore, Appellant Pro Se.
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Terell Moore appeals the district court's order dismissing his amended 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2012) for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Moore v. Parham, No. 1:16-cv-01519-CMH-IDD (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 23, 2017 & entered Mar. 24, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED