Case Name: Elsa TEKLE, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-11-02
Citations: 148 F. App'x 182
Docket Number: No. 05-1360
Parties: Elsa TEKLE, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Respondent.
Judges: Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 148
Pages: 182–182

Head Matter:
Elsa TEKLE, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Respondent.
No. 05-1360.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 19, 2005.
Decided: Nov. 2, 2005.
Allan Ebert, Law Offices of Allan Ebert, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Michelle Gorden Latour, Senior Litigation Counsel, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Elsa Tekle, a native of Eritrea, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying as untimely her motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board's order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (c) (2005). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Tekle, No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ] (B.I.A. Mar. 7, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED