Case Name: Hale v. Metalweld, Inc. et al., Appellants
Court: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1967-03-23
Citations: 209 Pa. Super. 298
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 746
Parties: Hale v. Metalweld, Inc. et al., Appellants.
Judges: Before Ervin, P. J., Wright, Montgomery, Jacobs, Hoffman, and Spaulding, JJ. (Watkins, J., absent).
Reporter: Pennsylvania Superior Court Reports
Volume: 209
Pages: 298–299

Head Matter:
Hale v. Metalweld, Inc. et al., Appellants.
Argued December 12, 1966.
Before Ervin, P. J., Wright, Montgomery, Jacobs, Hoffman, and Spaulding, JJ. (Watkins, J., absent).
Richard D. Harburg, with him Swartz, Campbell & Detweiler, for appellants.
Charles F. Quinn, with him Sheer & Mazzocone, for appellee.
Clyde M. Hughes and Daniel M. Rendine, for Commonwealth, appellee.
March 23, 1967:

Opinion:
Opinion
Pee Curiam,
This is an appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, remitting the record in a workmen's compensation case to the Board for additional findings of fact.
Although orders of this character are generally considered interlocutory, Wilk v. The Budd Company, 174 Pa. Superior Ct. 108, 100 A. 2d 127 (1953), we are not without power to review them. Barber v. Fleming Raugh, Inc., 208 Pa. Superior Ct. 230, 222 A. 2d 423 (1966); Rozauski v. Glen Alden Coal Company, 165 Pa. Superior Ct. 460, 69 A. 2d 192 (1949).
After thorough and independent study, we are of the opinion that the record before us is sufficient to permit the lower court to decide the case on the merits. The order of the lower court is therefore reversed, and the record is remanded to it for that purpose.