Case Name: In the Matter of the Marriage of McMULLEN, Respondent-Cross-Appellant, and McMULLEN, Appellant-Cross-Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1978-01-16
Citations: 32 Or. App. 175
Docket Number: No. 76-1725, CA 8832
Parties: In the Matter of the Marriage of McMULLEN, Respondent—Cross-Appellant, and McMULLEN, Appellant—Cross-Respondent.
Judges: Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Lee and Roberts, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 32
Pages: 175–175

Head Matter:
Argued December 20, 1977,
affirmed January 16,
reconsideration denied February 23,
petition for review denied March 28, 1978
In the Matter of the Marriage of McMULLEN, Respondent—Cross-Appellant, and McMULLEN, Appellant—Cross-Respondent.
(No. 76-1725, CA 8832)
573 P2d 1
Donald A. Bick, Eugene, argued the cause for appellant — cross-respondent. With him on the briefs was Bick & Monte, Eugene.
Eric Haws, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent — cross-appellant. With him on the briefs was Bradley & Haws, Eugene.
Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Lee and Roberts, Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. No costs to either party. Niedert and Niedert, 28 Or App 309, 559 P2d 515, rev den (1977).