Case Name: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. HAROLD FINKLE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1974-12-04
Citations: 66 N.J. 139
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. HAROLD FINKLE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 66
Pages: 139–139

Head Matter:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. HAROLD FINKLE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Argued November 18, 1974
Decided December 4, 1974.
Mr. Harold Finkle, of the New York Bar, argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Morgan F. Thomas, attorney).
Mr. Robert A. Rubenfold, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division. 128 N. J. Super. 199.
Clieeobd, J., concurs in the result.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Hughes, Justices Jacobs, Mountain, Sullivan, Pashman, Clieeobd and Judge Col-lestee — 7.
For reversal — None.