Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Sergio Ervey MADRID-MADRID, also known as Serjio Madrid-Madrid, also known as Sergio Madrid-Ervey, also known as Sergio Ervey, also known as Sergio Irving Madrid-Madrid, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-10-22
Citations: 620 F. App'x 335
Docket Number: No. 15-50091
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Sergio Ervey MADRID-MADRID, also known as Serjio Madrid-Madrid, also known as Sergio Madrid-Ervey, also known as Sergio Ervey, also known as Sergio Irving Madrid-Madrid, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 620
Pages: 335–336

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Sergio Ervey MADRID-MADRID, also known as Serjio Madrid-Madrid, also known as Sergio Madrid-Ervey, also known as Sergio Ervey, also known as Sergio Irving Madrid-Madrid, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-50091
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Oct. 22, 2015.
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Bradford W. Bogan, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Maureen Scott Franco, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Sergio Ervey Madrid-Madrid has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Madrid-Madrid has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.