Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Drako O. SULLIVAN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-08-02
Citations: 474 F. App'x 974
Docket Number: No. 12-6579
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Drako O. SULLIVAN, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 474
Pages: 974–974

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Drako O. SULLIVAN, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 12-6579.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 26, 2012.
Decided: Aug. 2, 2012.
Drako dandis Sullivan, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Burke Moorman, Office of The United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Drako O. Sullivan appeals the district court's oral orders denying his self-styled "Motion to Correct Procedural Default" under Fed.R.Crim.P. 32 and denying reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's orders. See United States v. Sullivan, No. 6:01-cr-00898-HMH-l (D.S.C. Mar. 6, 2012 & Mar. 15, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.