Case Name: Jesse W. Fenton, appellant, v. William S. Crook et al., respondents
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1919-02-06
Citations: 90 N.J. Eq. 274
Docket Number: 
Parties: Jesse W. Fenton, appellant, v. William S. Crook et al., respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 90
Pages: 274–274

Head Matter:
Jesse W. Fenton, appellant, v. William S. Crook et al., respondents.
[Decided February 6th, 1919.]
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Stevens, whose opinion is reported in 88 N. J. Eq. 432.
Mr. Samuel Roessler, for the appellant.
Messrs. Codington & Blalz, for the respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Stevens. ,
For affirmance — Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, White, PIerpeniieimer, Williams, Gardner — 12.
For reversal — None.