Case Name: Adolph Prager, Respondent, v. Theodore C. Schafuss, Doing Business Under the Name of F. L. Schafuss & Co., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1906
Citations: 51 Misc. 647
Docket Number: 
Parties: Adolph Prager, Respondent, v. Theodore C. Schafuss, Doing Business Under the Name of F. L. Schafuss & Co., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 51
Pages: 647–647

Head Matter:
Adolph Prager, Respondent, v. Theodore C. Schafuss, Doing Business Under the Name of F. L. Schafuss & Co., Appellant.
Appeal — Review — Scope of review — Review of evidence on appeal from final judgment.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York, rendered in favor of the plaintiff.
George F. Fleming, for appellant.
Alfred and Charles Steckler, for respondent.

Opinion:
Levehtbitt, J.
The only ground of appeal presented is that the verdict of the jury is against the weight of evidence. Not only does the record show that such is not the fact, but, even if it were, the defendant is not in a position to raise the question. By his omission to appeal from the order denying the motion for a new trial, he precludes us from weighing the evidence and confines us to a consideration of exceptions, of which the record is barren. Third Ave. R. R. Co. v. Ebling, 100 N. Y. 98; Mollineaux v. Clapp, 99 App. Div. 543; Zeisloft v. Blackburne Co., 45 Misc. Rep. 595.
Gildeesleeve and McCall, JJ., concur.
Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent.