Case Name: GEORGE GONZALES, APPELLANT AND PROSECUTOR BELOW, v. MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOBOKEN ET AL., RESPONDENTS
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1913-11-17
Citations: 85 N.J.L. 384
Docket Number: 
Parties: GEORGE GONZALES, APPELLANT AND PROSECUTOR BELOW, v. MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOBOKEN ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 85
Pages: 384–385

Head Matter:
GEORGE GONZALES, APPELLANT AND PROSECUTOR BELOW, v. MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOBOKEN ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Argued July 1, 1913
Decided November 17, 1913.
On appeal from the Supreme Court.
Por the appellant, Merritt Lane.
Por the respondents, John J. Fallon.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The questions raised in this case are precisely the same as those existing in the case of Fagan v. Hoboken, 55 Vroom 226, and the judgment of the Supreme Court entered in this case will be reversed and the proceedings and resolutions under review set aside for the reasons given in that case.
For affirmance — hione.
For reversal — The Chief Justice, Garrison, Trenchabu, Paeiíer, Bergen, Mintuen, Yeedenburgit, Cong-don, White, Teehune, Heppeniteimeb, JJ. 11.