Case Name: Jimmy Roy BUSHNELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, et al., Defendant-Appellee
Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1984-02-01
Citations: 444 So. 2d 796
Docket Number: No. 83-699
Parties: Jimmy Roy BUSHNELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, et al., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before GUIDRY, CUTRER and STOKER, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 444
Pages: 796–796

Head Matter:
Jimmy Roy BUSHNELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, et al., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 83-699.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.
Feb. 1, 1984.
Preston N. Aucoin, Alex D. Chapman, Jr., Donald J. Launey, Jr., Ville Platte, for plaintiff-appellant.
Guglielmo & Lopez, Peter Caviness, Opelousas, Edward 0. Taulbee, IV, Richard C. Meaux, Keith Borne, Onebane, Donohoe, Bernard, Torian, Diaz, McNamara & Abell, Lafayette, Harvey Lee Hall, Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellee.
Before GUIDRY, CUTRER and STOKER, JJ.

Opinion:
STOKER, Judge.
This appeal involves the same issues and procedural history described in our opinion rendered this day in Freeman, et al v. Insurance Company of North America, 444 So.2d 793 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1974), our docket number 83-426. On May 23, 1983, the trial court signed a judgment in this case granting the motion for summary judgment filed by INA and dismissing the action as to INA. The judgment was similar to the April 18, 1983, consolidated judgment which dismissed the Emma Williams Freeman suit and others. Jimmy Roy Bushnell appealed in this matter from the dismissal of his suit in the judgment of June 23, 1983.
For the reasons given in the opinion in the Emma Williams Freeman suit mentioned above, the judgment of the trial court dated April 18, 1983, dismissing appellant Bushnell's action is affirmed. The costs of this appeal are assessed to Bushnell.
AFFIRMED.