Case Name: WILLIAM J. SCHWENN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. S. GOLDBERG & CO., INC., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1966-06-06
Citations: 91 N.J. Super. 346
Docket Number: 
Parties: WILLIAM J. SCHWENN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. S. GOLDBERG & CO., INC., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 91
Pages: 346–346

Head Matter:
WILLIAM J. SCHWENN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. S. GOLDBERG & CO., INC., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued May 16, 1966
Decided June 6, 1966.
Before Judges Coneokd, Kilkenny and Leonabd.
Mr. Ralph W. Chandless argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Chandless, Weller & Kramer, attorneys).
Mr. Jacob Schneider argued the cause for respondent (Mr. E. Dennis Brod, on the brief).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Botter in the Law Division, 88 N. J. Super. 113 (1965).