Case Name: MEIGS v. LONDON ASSUR. CO.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1905-02-03
Citations: 134 F. 1021
Docket Number: No. 15
Parties: MEIGS v. LONDON ASSUR. CO.
Judges: Before DADLAS and GRAY, Circuit Judges, and BRADFORD, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter
Volume: 134
Pages: 1021–1021

Head Matter:
MEIGS v. LONDON ASSUR. CO.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
February 3, 1905.)
No. 15.
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United' States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
Samuel Dickson, for plaintiff in error.
G. W. Pepper, for defendant in error.
Before DADLAS and GRAY, Circuit Judges, and BRADFORD, District Judge.

Opinion:
DALLAS, Circuit Judge.
The able argument which has been submitted on behalf of the plaintiff in error has had our careful attention, but it has failed to convince us that any error was committed by the Circuit Court in its decision of this case. The learned judge carefully considered it in an-opinion which, we think, completely vindicated his conclusion. 126 Fed. 781. Upon that opinion, therefore, the judgment is affirmed.