Case Name: PRESTIGE PRINTING AH CORP., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-02-21
Citations: 668 So. 2d 1052
Docket Number: No. 95-961
Parties: PRESTIGE PRINTING AH CORP., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and GODERICH, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 668
Pages: 1052–1053

Head Matter:
PRESTIGE PRINTING AH CORP., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Appellee.
No. 95-961.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 21, 1996.
Jonathan N. David, Miami, for appellant.
Thornton J. Williams, General Counsel and Marianne A. Trussell, Assistant General Counsel, Tallahassee, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and GODERICH, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
There is no merit either in appellant's challenge to the constitutionality of section 287.042(2)(c), Florida Statutes (Supp.1994), see Carter v. Sparkman, 335 So.2d 802 (Fla.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1041, 97 S.Ct. 740, 50 L.Ed.2d 753 (1977); Griffith v. Vecchiarelli, 97 So.2d 691 (Fla.1957), or its com plaints about the manner in which it was applied by the D.O.T. Cf. ABI Walton Ins. Co. v. State Dep't of Management Servs., 641 So.2d 967 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (reversal required only because bidder not given reasonable opportunity to post § 287.042(2)(c) bond in appropriate amount).
Affirmed.