Case Name: J. Roger ST. AMAND, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SMURFIT-STONE CONTAINER CORPORATION et al., Defendants, Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-08-10
Citations: 104 F. App'x 193
Docket Number: No. 04-1019
Parties: J. Roger ST. AMAND, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SMURFIT-STONE CONTAINER CORPORATION et al., Defendants, Appellees.
Judges: Before SELYA, DYK and HOWARD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 104
Pages: 193–194

Head Matter:
J. Roger ST. AMAND, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SMURFIT-STONE CONTAINER CORPORATION et al., Defendants, Appellees.
No. 04-1019.
United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
Aug. 10, 2004.
A. J. O’Donald, III for appellant.
Kevin B. Callanan for appellees.
Before SELYA, DYK and HOWARD, Circuit Judges.
Of the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have read the briefs in this case, listened attentively to oral arguments, and reviewed the record with care. We conclude, without serious question, that the district court appropriately granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment. The material facts are not genuinely in dispute. The legal principles that govern this case are well-settled and the district court applied those principles faultlessly. Consequently, we summarily affirm the judgment below, substantially for the reasons set forth in the district court's bench decision of November 5, 2003, and its sub sequent memorandum and order dated November 6, 2003.
Affirmed. See 1st Cir. R. 27(c).