Case Name: INTERVISA, CORP., Appellant, v. BARNETT BANK OF SOUTH FLORIDA, N.A., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-12-31
Citations: 590 So. 2d 1124
Docket Number: Nos. 91-385, 90-2547
Parties: INTERVISA, CORP., Appellant, v. BARNETT BANK OF SOUTH FLORIDA, N.A., Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and GERSTEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 590
Pages: 1124–1124

Head Matter:
INTERVISA, CORP., Appellant, v. BARNETT BANK OF SOUTH FLORIDA, N.A., Appellee.
Nos. 91-385, 90-2547.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 31, 1991.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 28, 1992.
Akerman, Senterfitt & Eidson, and Steven E.M. Hartz, and Jorge J. Perez, and Aileen M. Ugalde, Miami, for appellant.
Mandler & Silver, and Mitchell W. Man-dler, and Joe N. Unger, Miami, for appel-lee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and GERSTEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Hendricks v. Dailey, 208 So.2d 101 (Fla.1968); Diamond v. Rosenfeld, 511 So.2d 1031 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), review denied 520 So.2d 586 (Fla.1988); Idy Corporation v. Fenton, 454 So.2d 13 (Fla.3d DCA 1984); Cirou v. Basler, 432 So.2d 628 (Fla.3d DCA 1983); § 620.125, Fla.Stat. (1989).