Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jimmie S. CHAMBERS, Defendant-Appellant; Jimmie S. CHAMBERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant-Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1991-03-26
Citations: 809 S.W.2d 93
Docket Number: Nos. 56447, 58135 and 58177
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jimmie S. CHAMBERS, Defendant-Appellant. Jimmie S. CHAMBERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant-Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 809
Pages: 93–93

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jimmie S. CHAMBERS, Defendant-Appellant. Jimmie S. CHAMBERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant-Respondent.
Nos. 56447, 58135 and 58177.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
March 26, 1991.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 22, 1991.
Application to Transfer Denied June 11, 1991.
Scott Everett Walter, Clayton, for defendant-appellant.
William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Robert P. Sass, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff-respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
This is a consolidated appeal of defendant's appeal from his jury conviction and sentence for assault, second degree, § 565.060 RSMo 1986, and his appeal from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. There is sufficient evidence to support the jury verdict, and the denial of the Rule 29.15 motion is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous.
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgments are affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).