Case Name: RIVERS v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1910-12-07
Citations: 132 S.W. 771
Docket Number: 
Parties: RIVERS v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 132
Pages: 771–772

Head Matter:
RIVERS v. STATE.
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Dec. 7, 1910.)
1. Criminal Law (§ 1090 ) — Appeal—Rulings on Application poe Continuance-Bill oe Exceptions.
Refusal of a continuance cannot be reviewed, in the absence of bill of exceptions.
[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. § 2812; Dec. Dig. § 1090. ]
2. Criminal Law (§ 1090 ) — Appeal—Rulings on Admission oe Evidence — Bill oe Exceptions.
Rulings on the admission of evidence cannot be reviewed, in the absence of bill of exceptions.
[ESd. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. § 2816; Dec. Dig. § 1090. ]
3. Criminal Law (§ 1090 ) —Appeal — Remarks oe Prosecuting Attorney — Review.
Remarks of the county attorney, stated as grounds of a motion for new trial, without any verification or bills of exception, cannot be considered on appeal.
[Ed. Note. — For other .cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. § 2819; Dec! Dig. § 1090. ]
Appeal from District Court, McLennan. County; Richard I. Munroe, Judge.
Ed Rivers was convicted of burglary, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
John A. Mobley, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
For other cases see same topic and section NUMBER in Dec. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key No. Series & Rep’r Indexes

Opinion:
DAVIDSON, P. J.
Appellant was convicted of burglary; his punishment being assessed at 12 years' confinement in the penitentiary.
The record is before us without bills of exception or statement of facts. The motion for new trial sets up error on the part of the court in refusing to continue the case. This matter cannot be reviewed in the absence of bill of exceptions.
There are several grounds in the motion for new trial alleging error on the part of the court in regard to the admission of evidence. These matters cannot be reviewed in the absence of bill of exceptions.
The twenty-second and twenty-third grounds of the motion for new trial are reserved to remarks of the county attorney. They are simply stated as grounds of the motion, without any verification or bills of exception, and cannot be considered.
The judgment is affirmed.