Case Name: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner, v. Katrina MOODY, Respondent; Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Petitioner, v. Barbara Ivery, Respondent; Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Petitioner, v. Bernadette Archie, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2013-11-07
Citations: 79 A.3d 1093
Docket Number: 
Parties: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner, v. Katrina MOODY, Respondent. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Petitioner, v. Barbara Ivery, Respondent. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Petitioner, v. Bernadette Archie, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 79
Pages: 1093–1094

Head Matter:
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner, v. Katrina MOODY, Respondent. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Petitioner, v. Barbara Ivery, Respondent. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Petitioner, v. Bernadette Archie, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Nov. 7, 2013.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 7th day of November, 2013, the Petitions for Allowance of Appeal are GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. The issues accepted for appeal, as stated by Petitioner with slight modifications, are:
(1) Did the Superior Court err in ruling that Respondent's violent in-court conduct was not summary direct criminal contempt because the trial court supposedly did not observe the conduct?
(2) In cases of summary direct criminal contempt, is a defendant entitled to counsel and to call witnesses?