Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Gina Mancini, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2006-07-05
Citations: 7 N.Y.3d 767
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gina Mancini, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 7
Pages: 767–771

Head Matter:
[853 NE2d 224, 819 NYS2d 855]
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gina Mancini, Appellant.
Argued June 7, 2006;
decided July 5, 2006
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Legal Aid Bureau of Buffalo, Inc., Buffalo (Robert L. Kemp, David C. Shopp and Barbara J. Davies of counsel), for appellant.
Frank J. Clark, District Attorney, Buffalo (Michael L. McCabe and J. Michael Marion of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be modified by reducing defendant's conviction of depraved indifference murder (Penal Law § 125.25 [2]) to manslaughter in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.15 [1]), and by remitting the case to Supreme Court for resentencing and, as so modified, affirmed. Defendant did not commit depraved indifference murder within the meaning of the statute (see People v Suarez, 6 NY3d 202, 212-214 [2005]). We disagree with the contention of our dissenting colleague that by leaving the victim to die, as here, defendant committed depraved indifference murder. That test would sweep in the vast number of homicides where the killers do not linger with their victims, awaiting aid (see id. at 209 n 3). "[[Irrespective of what the actor does or does not do after inflicting the fatal injury, depraved indifference murder is not made out unless the core statutory requirement of depraved indifference is established" (id. at 210) (emphasis added).