Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Fred Sackmann, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1975-07-10
Citations: 49 A.D.2d 542
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Fred Sackmann, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 49
Pages: 542–542

Head Matter:
(July 10, 1975)
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Fred Sackmann, Appellant.

Opinion:
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered on March 22, 1973, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of the crimes of assault in the first and second degrees and possession of a weapon, unanimously reversed, on the law, judgment vacated and matter remanded for a new trial. The trial court's failure to charge that justification constituted a defense to the crimes of which defendant was convicted and its failure to properly instruct the jury that the prosecution had the burden of disproving that defense beyond a reasonable doubt deprived defendant of his right to a fair trial on the primary issue raised. "Justification is a 'defense' (revised Penal Law, § 35.00)—as opposed to an 'affirmative defense'—and 'the people have the burden of disproving such defense beyond a reasonable doubt' (revised Penal Law, § 25.00)". (People v Steele, 26 NY2d 526, 528.) Whatever the trial court did say with regard to this defense was indefinite and confusing. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Kupferman, Tilzer, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.