Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Floyd JACKSON, Appellant; Floyd JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1997-06-03
Citations: 946 S.W.2d 271
Docket Number: No. 69285
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Floyd JACKSON, Appellant. Floyd JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 946
Pages: 271–272

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Floyd JACKSON, Appellant. Floyd JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 69285.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
June 3, 1997.
A. Renae Adamson, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Jefferson City, John J. Lynch, Assistant Attorney General, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Floyd Jackson, appeals the judgment of conviction entered by the Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis after a jury found him guilty of two counts of first degree robbery, RSMo § 569.020 (1994), and two counts of armed criminal action, RSMo § 571.015 (1994). He also appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal files and find the judgment of conviction is supported by sufficient evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. We further find the judgment denying the Rule 29.15 motion is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgments pursuant to Rules 80.25(b) and 84.16(b).