Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Matthew Gardner, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2000-12-27
Citations: 278 A.D.2d 862
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Matthew Gardner, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 278
Pages: 862–862

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Matthew Gardner, Appellant.
[717 NYS2d 438]

Opinion:
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court did not abuse its discretion in resentencing defendant upon finding that he violated a condition of probation without ordering an updated presentence report. Defendant did not request that the original presentence report prepared less than five months earlier be updated, and the court was familiar with changes in defendant's status since the preparation of that report (see, People v Shattuck, 214 AD2d 1026, lv denied 86 NY2d 740; see also, People v Travers, 234 AD2d 808, 809). The sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Oswego County Court, Hafner, Jr., J. — Violation of Probation.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Green, Hayes, Wisner and Lawton, JJ.