Case Name: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. TEAMSTERS' FREIGHT LOCAL NO. 480, affiliated with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1969-04-23
Citations: 409 F.2d 610
Docket Number: No. 18789
Parties: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. TEAMSTERS’ FREIGHT LOCAL NO. 480, affiliated with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Respondent.
Judges: Before WEICK, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and CELEBREZZE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 409
Pages: 610–611

Head Matter:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. TEAMSTERS’ FREIGHT LOCAL NO. 480, affiliated with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Respondent.
No. 18789.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
April 23, 1969.
Leonard M. Wagman, N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Herbert Fishgold, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., on brief.
Cecil D. Branstetter, Nashville, Tenn., for respondent; Carrol D. Kilgore, Nashville, Tenn., on brief.
Mullinax, Wells, Mauzy, Levy & Richards, by L. N. D. Wells, Jr., Dallas, Tex., on brief of amicus curiae Southern Conference of Teamsters.
Before WEICK, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and CELEBREZZE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
The National Labor Relations Board has petitioned for enforcement of its order finding the Respondent, Teamsters' Freight Local No. 480 guilty of violations of Sections 8(b) (1) (A) and 8(b) (2) of the National Labor Relations Act. The Board's decision and order are reported at 167 N.L.R.B. No. 135.
The cause having come on to be heard upon the record, briefs and arguments of counsel, and upon due consideration thereof, the Court is of the opinion that there is substantial evidence upon the record, viewed as a whole, to support the findings of the Board.
Now therefore, it is ordered that the petition for enforcement of the said order of the Board may be, and it is hereby granted.