Case Name: Kenneth EDWARDS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-03-03
Citations: 652 So. 2d 852
Docket Number: No. 95-348
Parties: Kenneth EDWARDS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: HARRIS, C.J., and GRIFFIN, J., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 652
Pages: 852–852

Head Matter:
Kenneth EDWARDS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 95-348.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
March 3, 1995.
Rehearing Denied April 11, 1995.
Kenneth Edwards, Lawtey, pro se.
No appearance for appellee.

Opinion:
THOMPSON, Judge.
AFFIRMED. We affirm the summary denial of Edwards' 3.800(a) motion for post-conviction relief without prejudice. Although Edwards argues that the court imposed improper consecutive habitual offender sentences because they arose out of a single factual event, Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 278, 130 L.Ed.2d 195 (1994), the correct remedy to seek relief is a properly filed Rule 3.850 motion. See Massey v. State, 648 So.2d 785 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Borders v. State, 643 So.2d 110 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Callaway v. State, 642 So.2d 636 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994) (question certified).
HARRIS, C.J., and GRIFFIN, J., concur.
. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.800(a).