Case Name: Roger LANGE, d/b/a The Roger Lange Company, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Dr. Kevin GENTEMANN and Dr. John Wildeisen, d/b/a Glendale Medical Imaging, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-05-25
Citations: 991 S.W.2d 224
Docket Number: No. 74651
Parties: Roger LANGE, d/b/a The Roger Lange Company, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Dr. Kevin GENTEMANN and Dr. John Wildeisen, d/b/a Glendale Medical Imaging, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before JAMES R. DOWD, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 991
Pages: 224–225

Head Matter:
Roger LANGE, d/b/a The Roger Lange Company, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Dr. Kevin GENTEMANN and Dr. John Wildeisen, d/b/a Glendale Medical Imaging, Defendant/Respondent.
No. 74651.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
May 25, 1999.
William F. Whealen, Jr., Clayton, for appellant.
Bradley J. Washburn, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before JAMES R. DOWD, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff appeals the judgment entered in favor of Defendant, based upon the trial court's finding that there was insufficient evidence to support piercing the corporate veil in this breach of contract and quantum meruit action. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).