Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Charles Luciano, Alias Lucky Luciano, Alias Charles Lucania, Alias Lucky, Alias Charles Lane, Alias Charles Reid, Alias Charles Ross; Thomas Pennochio, Alias Tommy Bull, Alias Thomas Nelson, Alias Thomas Sullivan; David Betillo, Alias David Petillo, Alias Robert Quello, Alias David Rossa, Alias Little Davie; James Frederico, Alias Jimmy Fredericks, Alias Goldberg; Abraham Wahrman, Alias Abe Heller, Alias Abie; and Ralph Liguori, Appellants, Impleaded with Others, Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1937-07-16
Citations: 251 A.D. 887
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Charles Luciano, Alias Lucky Luciano, Alias Charles Lucania, Alias Lucky, Alias Charles Lane, Alias Charles Reid, Alias Charles Ross; Thomas Pennochio, Alias Tommy Bull, Alias Thomas Nelson, Alias Thomas Sullivan; David Betillo, Alias David Petillo, Alias Robert Quello, Alias David Rossa, Alias Little Davie; James Frederico, Alias Jimmy Fredericks, Alias Goldberg; Abraham Wahrman, Alias Abe Heller, Alias Abie; and Ralph Liguori, Appellants, Impleaded with Others, Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 251
Pages: 887–888

Head Matter:
(July 16, 1937.)
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Charles Luciano, Alias Lucky Luciano, Alias Charles Lucania, Alias Lucky, Alias Charles Lane, Alias Charles Reid, Alias Charles Ross; Thomas Pennochio, Alias Tommy Bull, Alias Thomas Nelson, Alias Thomas Sullivan; David Betillo, Alias David Petillo, Alias Robert Quello, Alias David Rossa, Alias Little Davie; James Frederico, Alias Jimmy Fredericks, Alias Goldberg; Abraham Wahrman, Alias Abe Heller, Alias Abie; and Ralph Liguori, Appellants, Impleaded with Others, Defendants.

Opinion:
Judgments and orders affirmed. No opinion.
Martin, P. J., Dore and Callahan, JJ., concur; Untermyer, J., concurs in the affirmance of the judgments as to all defendants, except as to the sentences, which he is of opinion are excessive and should be reduced; and also votes to modify the order, denying the motion for a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence as to the defendant Luciano. Opinion by Untermyer, J. Cohn, J., votes for affirmance of the judgments as to all defendants but concurs with Untermyer, J., with respect to the motion for a new trial. Present— Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.