Case Name: Clam Lake Township v. Department of Licensing & Regulatory Affairs
Court: Michigan Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Michigan
Decision Date: 2016-06-03
Citations: 499 Mich. 949
Docket Number: No. 151800; Court of Appeals No. 325350
Parties: Clam Lake Township v Department of Licensing & Regulatory Affairs,
Judges: 
Reporter: Michigan Reports
Volume: 499
Pages: 949–950

Head Matter:
Amended Order Entered June 3, 2016:
Clam Lake Township v Department of Licensing & Regulatory Affairs,
No. 151800; Court of Appeals No. 325350.
Leave to appeal granted 499 Mich 896.

Opinion:
On order of the Court, this Court's April 6, 2016 order is amended, to correct a clerical error, and reads as follows:
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 26, 2015 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is granted. The parties shall include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether Casco Twp v State Boundary Comm, 243 Mich App 392, 399 (2000), correctly held that the State Boundary Commission (SBC) has the authority to determine the validity of an agreement made pursuant to the Intergovernmental Conditional Transfer of Property by Contract Act, 1984 PA 425, MCL 124.21 et seq. (Act 425); (2) if so, whether the SBC in this case properly determined that the appellant townships' Act 425 Agreement was invalid; and (3) whether, despite the language of MCL 117.9(6) and MCL 123.1012(3) (providing a two-year waiting period before resubmission of a petition for annexation), the doctrine of collateral estoppel applied to invalidate the SBC's 2014 approval of the appellee property owner's petition for annexation on the basis of the SBC's denial of the same property owner's petition in 2012.
We further order that this case be argued and submitted to the Court together with the case of TeriDee LLC v Haring Charter Twp (Docket No. 153008), at such future session of the Court as both cases are ready for submission. In light of the joint submission, the time allotted for oral argument shall be limited to fifteen minutes per side in each case. MCR 7.314(B)(1). Motions for permission to file briefs amicus curiae and briefs amicus curiae regarding these two cases should be filed in Clam Lake Twp v Dep't of Licensing & Regulatory Affairs (Docket No. 151800) only and served on the parties in both cases.