Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Frederick SPENCER, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-06-08
Citations: 139 S.W.3d 605
Docket Number: No. ED 83972
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Frederick SPENCER, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 139
Pages: 605–606

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Frederick SPENCER, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 83972.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
June 8, 2004.
Andrea K. Spillars, Breck K Burgess, Assistant Attorneys General, Jefferson City, for respondent.
Frederick Spencer, Bonne Terre, pro se.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant, Frederick Spencer, appeals pro se from the order denying his motion seeking entry of a nunc pro tunc order. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).