Case Name: Darian Antonio COLEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Assistant Warden Randall WILLIAMS, each defendant is being suited in their individual and official capacity all times herein; Warden John Pate, each defendant is being suited in their individual and official capacity all times herein, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-05-17
Citations: 648 F. App'x 364
Docket Number: No. 15-7503
Parties: Darian Antonio COLEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Assistant Warden Randall WILLIAMS, each defendant is being suited in their individual and official capacity all times herein; Warden John Pate, each defendant is being suited in their individual and official capacity all times herein, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 648
Pages: 364–364

Head Matter:
Darian Antonio COLEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Assistant Warden Randall WILLIAMS, each defendant is being suited in their individual and official capacity all times herein; Warden John Pate, each defendant is being suited in their individual and official capacity all times herein, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15-7503.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 25, 2016.
Decided: May 17, 2016.
Darían Antonio Coleman, Appellant Pro Se. Christy L. Scott, Scott & Payne Law Firm, Walterboro, South Carolina, for Ap-pellees.
Before MOTZ, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Darían Antonio Coleman appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Coleman v. Williams, No. 8:14-cv-00748-DCN, 2015 WL 4743755 (D.S.C. Aug. 10, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED,