Case Name: Hossein ROKHIFAR, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-09-02
Citations: 113 S.W.3d 684
Docket Number: No. ED 82313
Parties: Hossein ROKHIFAR, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR. and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 113
Pages: 684–685

Head Matter:
Hossein ROKHIFAR, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 82313.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Sept. 2, 2003.
Gwenda R. Robinson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John Munson Morris, III, Linda Lemke, Asst. Attys. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR. and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The movant, Hossein Rokhifar, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. He contends he involuntarily pleaded guilty because his plea counsel assured him he would receive a sentence totaling ten years' imprisonment.
Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).