Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher WHITE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-03-06
Citations: 315 F. App'x 486
Docket Number: No. 08-7947
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher WHITE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 315
Pages: 486–486

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher WHITE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-7947.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 26, 2009.
Decided: March 6, 2009.
Christopher White, Appellant Pro Se. Jamie M. Bennett, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appel-lee.
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Christopher White appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. White, No. 1:98-cr-00358-WDQ-8 (D. Md. filed Sept. 2 & entered Sept. 3, 2008); see United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247, 257 (4th Cir.2009) ("When a sentence is within the guidelines applicable at the time of the original sentencing, in an 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) resentencing hearing, a district judge is not authorized to reduce a defendant's sentence below the amended guideline range."). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.