Case Name: Rolando GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1999-10-20
Citations: 742 So. 2d 528
Docket Number: No. 99-2309
Parties: Rolando GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before JORGENSON, GERSTEN, and GREEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 742
Pages: 528–529

Head Matter:
Rolando GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 99-2309.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 20, 1999.
Rolando Gonzalez, in proper person.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellant.
Before JORGENSON, GERSTEN, and GREEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Although we do not believe that chapter 95-184 violates the single-subject requirement found in Article III, section 6 of the Florida Constitution, see Trapp v. State, 736 So.2d 736 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999), we follow Trap and Heggs v. State, 718 So.2d 263 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. granted, 720 So.2d 518 (Fla.1998) in certifying the issue to the Florida Supreme Court as a matter of great public importance. The judgment entered below is affirmed.
Affirmed.
JORGENSON and GERSTEN, JJ., concur.