Case Name: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Senne
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1995-03-22
Citations: 71 Ohio St. 3d 614
Docket Number: No. 94-2307
Parties: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Senne.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 71
Pages: 614–616

Head Matter:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Senne.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Senne (1995), 71 Ohio St.3d 614.]
(No. 94-2307
Submitted January 10, 1995
Decided March 22, 1995.)
Geoffrey Stem, Disciplinary Counsel, and Sally Ann Steuk, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.
Richard McCune, for- respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Having thoroughly reviewed the record in this case, we agree with the board's findings that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(5) and (6), 6-101(A)(3), 7-101(A)(2) and. Gov.Bar R. VI(1) and (3). We also concur in the recommended sanction. Accordingly, we order that respondent be suspended indefinitely from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.