Case Name: Frederick Carl REESE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1999-12-15
Citations: 745 So. 2d 1128
Docket Number: No. 99-0987
Parties: Frederick Carl REESE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: WARNER, C.J., DELL and GUNTHER, JJ. concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 745
Pages: 1128–1129

Head Matter:
Frederick Carl REESE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 99-0987.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Dec. 15, 1999.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Sophia Letts, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and David M. Schultz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm. The trial court did not err by denying appellant's motion for judgment of acquittal. The record contains sufficient evidence to sustain appellant's conviction for felony battery. The record also contains sufficient evidence to support the jury's rejection of appellant's assertion of self defense to the felony battery charge.
AFFIRMED.
WARNER, C.J., DELL and GUNTHER, JJ. concur.