Case Name: Richard Jameson et al. v. Patrick Brinkley et al.
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1969-12-10
Citations: 158 Conn. 625
Docket Number: 
Parties: Richard Jameson et al. v. Patrick Brinkley et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 158
Pages: 625–626

Head Matter:
Richard Jameson et al. v. Patrick Brinkley et al.
King, C. J., Alcorn, House, Thim and Ryan, Js.
Argued December 9
decided December 10, 1969
William V. Dworski, for the appellants (plaintiffs) .
Manuel B. Clark, for the appellee (defendant Dignazio).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The charge failed to distinguish between an admission and an inconsistent statement. Sears v. Curtis, 147 Conn. 311, 315, 160 A.2d 742.
There is error, the judgment is set aside and a new trial is ordered.