Case Name: Jitendra P. SHAH, d/b/a A & R Investments, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Donald V. NANGLE and Jack C. Harper, Defendants/Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1993-08-24
Citations: 859 S.W.2d 276
Docket Number: No. 63057
Parties: Jitendra P. SHAH, d/b/a A & R Investments, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Donald V. NANGLE and Jack C. Harper, Defendants/Respondents.
Judges: Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 859
Pages: 276–276

Head Matter:
Jitendra P. SHAH, d/b/a A & R Investments, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Donald V. NANGLE and Jack C. Harper, Defendants/Respondents.
No. 63057.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Aug. 24, 1993.
Joel Case, Sally S. Rajnoha, Case & Rajn-oha, Ballwin, for plaintiff/appellant.
Arthur G. Muegler, Jr., Clayton, for defendant/respondent Donald V. Nangle.
Feme P. Wolf, Michael B. Marker, St. Louis, for defendant/respondent Jack C. Harper.
Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff-landlord sought to recover unpaid rent from defendants. In this court-tried case, plaintiff appeals from the directed verdict for defendants at the end of all the evidence. We affirm. No error of law appears in the trial court's judgment; an. extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).