Case Name: Charles S. HAINES, et al., Appellants, v. BLACK DIAMOND PROPERTIES, INC., et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2015-10-23
Citations: 176 So. 3d 1023
Docket Number: No. 5D14-2262
Parties: Charles S. HAINES, et al., Appellants, v. BLACK DIAMOND PROPERTIES, INC., et al., Appellees.
Judges: LAWSON, C.J., PALMER and TORPY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 176
Pages: 1023–1024

Head Matter:
Charles S. HAINES, et al., Appellants, v. BLACK DIAMOND PROPERTIES, INC., et al., Appellees.
No. 5D14-2262.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Oct. 23, 2015.
Steve A. Rothenburg, of Rothenburg Law Firm, Ocala, for Appellant.
Jack J. Aiello, and Edward A. Marod, of Gunster, Yoakley & Stewart, West Palm Beach, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm. Friedman v. Friedman, 825 So.2d 1010, 1011 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) (language in judgment, "for which let execution issue," unnecessary to obtain writ of execution). We express conflict with DuBreuil v. Regnvall, 527 So.2d 249 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).
AFFIRMED.
LAWSON, C.J., PALMER and TORPY, JJ., concur.