Case Name: Finley ARNETT et al., Appellants, v. Howard HENSLEY, Appellee
Court: Kentucky Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Kentucky
Decision Date: 1954-12-17
Citations: 273 S.W.2d 816
Docket Number: 
Parties: Finley ARNETT et al., Appellants, v. Howard HENSLEY, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 273
Pages: 816–817

Head Matter:
Finley ARNETT et al., Appellants, v. Howard HENSLEY, Appellee.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky.
Dec. 17, 1954.
Marcus Mann, Salyersville, for appellants.
Nickell & Walter, Gardner & Gabbard, West Liberty, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We are affirming .the $600 judgment in favor of the appellee because we think (1) the question of the plaintiff's contributory negligence was for the jury; and (2) the instruction objected to. was not improper, in view of the positive testimony' of' the-officers who measured the visibility distance at-the curve: where the accident occurred, and which made KRS 189.400 ap-' plicable to the case.
The motion for an appeal is overruled, and the judgment .is |ffirmed.