Case Name: Laron JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-04-18
Citations: 16 S.W.3d 719
Docket Number: No. ED 76826
Parties: Laron JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 16
Pages: 719–720

Head Matter:
Laron JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 76826.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
April 18, 2000.
Gwenda R. Robinson, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Shaun J. Mackelprang, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant Laron Johnson appeals from the judgment entered in the Circuit Court of St. Louis City denying, without an eviden-tiary hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. In that motion, Movant sought to vacate convictions of murder in the first degree, Section 565.010, RSMo 1994, and armed criminal action, Section 571.015, RSMo 1994 for which he was sentenced to concurrent terms of life without parole and thirty years' imprisonment, respectively.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The motion court did not clearly err in denying Mov-ant's motion. No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an extended published opinion reciting detailed facts and restating principles of law. We have, however, provided the parties with a memorandum opinion for their exclusive use detailing the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).