Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ricardo MACIEL, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-08-03
Citations: 694 F. App'x 763
Docket Number: No. 17-10571 Non-Argument Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ricardo MACIEL, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, MARCUS and FAY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 694
Pages: 763–764

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ricardo MACIEL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 17-10571 Non-Argument Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
(August 3, 2017)
Evelio Jesus Yera, U.S. Attorney’s Office, West Palm Beach, FL, Roy K. Altman, Wifredo A. Ferrer, William C. Healy, Andrea G. Hoffman, Emily M. Smachetti, Evelio Jesus Yera, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Ricardo Maciel, Pro Se
Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, MARCUS and FAY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Ricardo Maciel appeals pro se from the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Maciel claims that he is entitled to relief based on Amendment 801 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines. We disagree. Section 3582(c)(2) allows relief only in accordance with the policy statements of the Sentencing Commission. And the Commission's policy statement, which is codified at U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10, allows for sentence reductions based only on amendments to the guidelines that are specifically listed in § 1B1.10(d). Because Amendment 801 is not listed there, Maciel is not entitled to relief.'
AFFIRMED.