Case Name: Gerald KLEPAREK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2005-02-02
Citations: 891 So. 2d 1214
Docket Number: No. 4D04-1690
Parties: Gerald KLEPAREK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: FARMER, C.J., STONE and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 891
Pages: 1214–1214

Head Matter:
Gerald KLEPAREK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D04-1690.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb. 2, 2005.
Gerald Kleparek, Jasper, pro se.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Linda Harrison, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Gerald Kleparek appeals a trial court order denying his motion for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, raising twelve claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We reverse and remand the summary denial of claims five, eight, and nine, but affirm without discussion the remaining claims. Claims five, eight, and nine alleged that Kleparek entered his admission to allegations of violation of probation based on certain affirmative misadvice of his counsel, as to the sentencing guidelines range, the credit to which he would be entitled upon sentencing, and the length of sentence which would be imposed. The trial court erred in summarily denying these claims without record attachments refuting them, or an evidentiary hearing. See State v. Leroux, 689 So.2d 235 (Fla.1996); Bedwell v. State, 878 So.2d 423 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); Baker v. State, 879 So.2d 663 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Fisher v. State, 824 So.2d 1050 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002).
Accordingly, we reverse the trial court's order summarily denying these claims of affirmative misadvice and remand for attachment of portions of the record refuting them, or an evidentiary hearing.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART.
FARMER, C.J., STONE and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.