Case Name: In re ESTATE of Walter L. LAMB, Deceased. Walter L. LAMB, Jr. and Douglas R. Lamb, Individually, and as Personal Representatives of the Estate of Walter L. Lamb, Deceased, Appellants, v. Eleanor Ruth LAMB, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-07-03
Citations: 677 So. 2d 39
Docket Number: Nos. 95-1285, 95-1286
Parties: In re ESTATE of Walter L. LAMB, Deceased. Walter L. LAMB, Jr. and Douglas R. Lamb, Individually, and as Personal Representatives of the Estate of Walter L. Lamb, Deceased, Appellants, v. Eleanor Ruth LAMB, Appellee.
Judges: GUNTHER, C.J., and FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 677
Pages: 39–39

Head Matter:
In re ESTATE of Walter L. LAMB, Deceased. Walter L. LAMB, Jr. and Douglas R. Lamb, Individually, and as Personal Representatives of the Estate of Walter L. Lamb, Deceased, Appellants, v. Eleanor Ruth LAMB, Appellee.
Nos. 95-1285, 95-1286.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
July 3, 1996.
Clarification, Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied Aug. 13, 1996.
John Beranek of MaeFarlane, Ausley, Ferguson & McMullen, Tallahassee, and Cecil T. Farrington, Ft. Lauderdale, for appellants.
W. George Allen and Virginia D. Stow of the Law Office of W. George Allen, Ft. Laud-erdale, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the three probate orders which are the subject of these consolidated appeals, which we have concluded are without prejudice to the appellants litigating the issue of whether the appellee breached a pre-nuptial agreement.
GUNTHER, C.J., and FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.