Case Name: In re Marlene A. PENROD, Debtor, AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc., Appellant, v. Marlene A. Penrod, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-02-28
Citations: 636 F.3d 1175
Docket Number: No. 08-60037
Parties: In re Marlene A. PENROD, Debtor, AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc., Appellant, v. Marlene A. Penrod, Appellee.
Judges: Before: ALFRED T. GOODWIN and WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and RICHARD MILLS, Senior District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 636
Pages: 1175–1181

Head Matter:
In re Marlene A. PENROD, Debtor, AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc., Appellant, v. Marlene A. Penrod, Appellee.
No. 08-60037.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Feb. 28, 2011.
Kenneth N. Klee, Klee, Tuchin, Bogdanoff & Stern LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Debtor.
Randal Paul Mroczynski, Cooksey Toolen Gage Duffy & Woog, William M. Burke, Costa Mesa, CA, for Appellant.
Craig Vincent Winslow, Esquire, Law Offices of Craig V. Winslow, San Mateo, CA, for Appellee.
Before: ALFRED T. GOODWIN and WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and RICHARD MILLS, Senior District Judge.
The Honorable Richard Mills, Senior District Judge for the U.S. District Court for Central Illinois, Springfield, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
Order; Dissent by Judge BEA.
ORDER
Judge W. Fletcher has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judges Goodwin and Mills so recommend.
A judge of the court called for a vote on the petition for rehearing en banc. A vote was taken, and a majority of the active judges of the court failed to vote for en banc rehearing. Fed. R.App. P. 35(f).
Appellant's petition for rehearing en banc, filed August 30, 2010, is DENIED.