Case Name: Mary O'Keefe, as Administratrix, etc., of Thomas P. O'Keefe, Deceased, Respondent, v. William Halstead and John Herbert King, Defendants, Impleaded with William Scott and James T. Scott, Copartners, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Scott Brothers, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1930-10
Citations: 230 A.D. 855
Docket Number: 
Parties: Mary O’Keefe, as Administratrix, etc., of Thomas P. O’Keefe, Deceased, Respondent, v. William Halstead and John Herbert King, Defendants, Impleaded with William Scott and James T. Scott, Copartners, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Scott Brothers, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 230
Pages: 855–855

Head Matter:
Mary O’Keefe, as Administratrix, etc., of Thomas P. O’Keefe, Deceased, Respondent, v. William Halstead and John Herbert King, Defendants, Impleaded with William Scott and James T. Scott, Copartners, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Scott Brothers, Appellants.

Opinion:
Order denying motion of defendants Scott for leave to serve a supplemental answer affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell, Seudder and TompMns, JJ., concur.