Case Name: Datuk Ramesh CHANDER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Stan G. BARRY, Sheriff, Fairfax County, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-05-27
Citations: 63 F. App'x 735
Docket Number: No. 02-1554
Parties: Datuk Ramesh CHANDER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Stan G. BARRY, Sheriff, Fairfax County, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 63
Pages: 735–736

Head Matter:
Datuk Ramesh CHANDER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Stan G. BARRY, Sheriff, Fairfax County, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 02-1554.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 13, 2003.
Decided May 27, 2003.
Hunter C. Harrison, Jr., McLean, Virginia, for Appellant. James R. Parrish, Brandt, Jennings, Snee, Dupray & Parrish, P.L.L.C., Falls Church, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
PER CURIAM.
Datuk Ramesh Chander appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to Defendant on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Chander v. Barry, No. CA-01-1333 (E.D.Va. Apr. 24, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.