Case Name: Prince v. Camman and another
Court: New York Court of Chancery
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1840-06-18
Citations: 3 Edw. Ch. 413
Docket Number: 
Parties: Prince v. Camman and another.
Judges: 
Reporter: Edwards' Chancery Reports
Volume: 3
Pages: 413–414

Head Matter:
Prince v. Camman and another.
June 18, 1840.
(j0SfSt Ca. sa.
A ca. sa. is not to be taken out on a decree for costs and dismissal of bill.
The bill had been dismissed, with costs and the defendants issued a ca. sa. They were taxed;
The question (submitted) was, whether the parties issuing the writ were entitled to a ca. sa. for the costs 1
Mr. Hamersley, for the defendants.
Mr. Western, for the complainant.

Opinion:
The Vice-Chancellor :
I am of opinion, after looking into the bill and at Ex parte Beatty, 12 Wend. 229, (the latter giving a construction to the non-imprisonment act,) that this case comes within such act; and, consequently, that the complainant is not liable to a ca. sa. for the costs of the suit.
Order, to set aside the writ.