Case Name: James E. HUFF, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF the ARMY, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-08-04
Citations: 390 F. App'x 208
Docket Number: No. 10-1436
Parties: James E. HUFF, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF the ARMY, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 390
Pages: 208–209

Head Matter:
James E. HUFF, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF the ARMY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 10-1436.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 27, 2010.
Decided: Aug. 4, 2010.
James E. Huff, Appellant pro se. Alex Gordon, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James E. Huff appeals the district court's order denying his "motion to resume complaint," which the district court construed as a motion to reopen, and for the appointment of counsel. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). While Huffs informal brief asserts various errors in the district court's order dismissing his civil action, which was issued in September 2007, it does not challenge the district court's disposition of the motion that is the subject of this appeal. Thus, we hold Huff has forfeited appellate review of that order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.