Case Name: Jill E. HANSEN, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. DAYTON'S, n/k/a Macy's, Self-Insured, Relator/Cross-Respondent, and John G. Stark, M.D., P.A., Hennepin Faculty Associates, and RS Medical, Intervenors, and Medica Health Plans, Intervenor-Respondent
Court: Minnesota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Minnesota
Decision Date: 2011-08-26
Citations: 802 N.W.2d 725
Docket Number: No. A11-0432
Parties: Jill E. HANSEN, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. DAYTON’S, n/k/a Macy’s, Self-Insured, Relator/Cross-Respondent, and John G. Stark, M.D., P.A., Hennepin Faculty Associates, and RS Medical, Intervenors, and Medica Health Plans, Intervenor-Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: North Western Reporter 2d
Volume: 802
Pages: 725–725

Head Matter:
Jill E. HANSEN, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. DAYTON’S, n/k/a Macy’s, Self-Insured, Relator/Cross-Respondent, and John G. Stark, M.D., P.A., Hennepin Faculty Associates, and RS Medical, Intervenors, and Medica Health Plans, Intervenor-Respondent.
No. A11-0432.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
Aug. 26, 2011.
Mark J. Freeman, Fitch, Johnson, Larson & Held, Minneapolis, MN, for respondent/cross-appellant.
Timothy P. Jung, Lind, Jensen, Sullivan & Peterson, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for relator/cross-respondent.
M. Shannon Peterson, McCollum, Crowley, Moschet, Miller <& Laak, Ltd., Minneapolis, MN, for intervenor-respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed February 2, 2011, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.982) (explaining that [sjummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).
BY THE COURT:
/s/Paul H. Anderson Associate Justice