Case Name: MARSHALL & E. T. RY. CO. et al. v. MOORE
Court: Texas Courts of Civil Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1915-06-07
Citations: 178 S.W. 1199
Docket Number: No. 1485
Parties: MARSHALL & E. T. RY. CO. et al. v. MOORE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 178
Pages: 1199–1199

Head Matter:
MARSHALL & E. T. RY. CO. et al. v. MOORE.
(No. 1485.)
(Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Texarkana.
June 7, 1915.
Rehearing Denied June 10, 1915.)
Appeal from Wood County Court; R. B. Bogeman, Judge.
Action by A. L. Moore against the Marshall & East Texas Railway Company and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.
Affirmed.
R. B. Howell, of Winnsboro, for appellants. M. D. Carlock, of Winnsboro, for appellee.

Opinion:
HODGES, J.
This is a suit by the appellee against the appellants, the Marshall & East Texas Railway Company, the St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company of Texas, and the Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company of Texas, to recover damages for injuries to a shipment of live stock. The case was tried before the court without a jury, and a judgment rendered in favor of appellee for $786.71.
The negligence alleged and relied on upon the trial consisted of unreasonable delays and rough handling. The assignments presented in the briefs of the appellants merely complain that the evidence was insufficient to support the judgment. The court filed findings of fact and conclusions of law. These are not complained of in any of the assignments of error. The facts found are sufficient to justify the conclusions of law and the judgment rendered.
We have also taken pains to examine the statement of facts, .and have concluded that the judgment of the court should be affirmed; and it is so ordered.