Case Name: John J. JOHNSON, Claimant-Appellant, v. KASTEN CLAY PRODUCTS, INC., Employer-Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-06-15
Citations: 136 S.W.3d 833
Docket Number: No. ED 83849
Parties: John J. JOHNSON, Claimant-Appellant, v. KASTEN CLAY PRODUCTS, INC., Employer-Respondent.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 136
Pages: 833–834

Head Matter:
John J. JOHNSON, Claimant-Appellant, v. KASTEN CLAY PRODUCTS, INC., Employer-Respondent.
No. ED 83849.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
June 15, 2004.
Andrew R. Tarry, Perryville, MO, for appellant.
Fielding A. Poe, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
In this workers' compensation case, claimant John J. Johnson appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying compensation. The claimant alleges error in the Commission's denial of compensation because its award is not supported by sufficient, competent, and substantial evidence. The claimant also alleges error in the commission's denial of his application to submit additional evidence.
We have reviewed the parties' briefs and the record on appeal. We find the Commission's decision is supported by sufficient competent and substantial evidence on the whole record and no error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision.
The award is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).