Case Name: Thomas E. TILLEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee, and Marvin HEDGEPETH, Party-in-interest
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-05-03
Citations: 96 F. App'x 144
Docket Number: No. 03-2473
Parties: Thomas E. TILLEY, Petitioner—Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent—Appellee, and Marvin HEDGEPETH, Party-in-interest.
Judges: Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 96
Pages: 144–144

Head Matter:
Thomas E. TILLEY, Petitioner—Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent—Appellee, and Marvin HEDGEPETH, Party-in-interest.
No. 03-2473.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 29, 2004.
Decided: May 3, 2004.
Thomas E. Tilley, Appellant pro se.
Sara Ann Ketchum, Thomas J. Clark, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Thomas E. Tilley appeals from the district court's order dismissing his petition to quash a summons issued by the Internal Revenue Service. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Tilley v. United States, No. CA-03-1-5 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 24, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED