Case Name: Commonwealth v. Wolfe, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1972-09-15
Citations: 222 Pa. Super. Ct. 269
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 16
Parties: Commonwealth v. Wolfe, Appellant.
Judges: Before Weight, P. J., Watkins, Jacobs, Hoffman, Spaulding, Cercone, and Packed, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania Superior Court Reports
Volume: 222
Pages: 269–274

Head Matter:
Commonwealth v. Wolfe, Appellant.
September 15, 1972:
Submitted March 13, 1972.
Before Weight, P. J., Watkins, Jacobs, Hoffman, Spaulding, Cercone, and Packed, JJ.
Kenneth E. Hankins, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Edward 8. Newlin, Second Assistant District Attorney, and John R. Walker, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Opinion:
Opinion
Per .Curiam,
The record shows that the court below did not disregard the defendant's contention that some of the convictions appearing in the pre-sentence report were incorrect. Cf. United States v. Weston, 448 F. 2d 626 (9th Cir. 1971). Furthermore, the court below acted reasonably, in view of the circumstances, in imposing the sentences with the explanation that it wanted the defendant to be released on parole as soon as the State Parole Board determines that he evidences rehabilitation.
The appellant requests that if his appeal is unsuccessful there be a remand for disposition of a post- conviction hearing petition pending in the court below. We should not assume, without a record or consideration by the court below, that the plea of guilty was involuntary because it was made without the aid of counsel, where the appellant at arraignment had unequivocally taken the position that he did not want counsel.
Judgment of sentence affirmed, without prejudice to the pending post-conviction proceeding.