Case Name: James J. Galligan et al., App'lts, v. Rodger C. Groten, Resp't
Court: New York City Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1896-04-27
Citations: 72 N.Y. St. Rep. 868
Docket Number: 
Parties: James J. Galligan et al., App’lts, v. Rodger C. Groten, Resp’t.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 72
Pages: 868–868

Head Matter:
James J. Galligan et al., App’lts, v. Rodger C. Groten, Resp’t.
N. Y. C. C.,
April 27, 1896.
T. E. Murray, for app’lts; Rabe & Keller, for resp't.

Opinion:
FITZSIMONS, J.
— There is not a single fact alleged in the affidavits upon which the attachments herein was granted that shows that the defendant was about to assign, dispose of, or secrete his property with the intent to hinder, delay, and defraud his creditors (the ground upon which the same was issued). The attachment was therefore rightly vacated, and the order appealed from must be affirmed, with costs.