Case Name: Harold Lewis PEEK, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America et al., Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1971-03-19
Citations: 438 F.2d 534
Docket Number: No. 25044
Parties: Harold Lewis PEEK, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America et al., Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 438
Pages: 534–535

Head Matter:
Harold Lewis PEEK, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America et al., Respondents-Appellees.
No. 25044.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
March 19, 1971.
Rehearing Denied April 16, 1971.
Harold Lewis Peek, in pro. per.
Stan Pitkin, U. S. Atty., Charles W. Billinghurst, Asst. U. S. Atty., Tacoma, Wash., for appellees.
Before BROWNING and TRASK, Circuit Judges, and PREGERSON , District Judge.
Honorable Harry Pregerson, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The district court dismissed petitioner's motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 on the ground that the contentions it raised had been determined adversely to petitioner on his prior motions. See Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 1, 83 S.Ct. 1068, 10 L.Ed.2d 148 (1963); Gomez v. United States, 396 F.2d 323 (9th Cir. 1968). Petitioner has failed to demonstrate that the district court erred.
Affirmed.