Case Name: Darius SUMPTER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2015-07-14
Citations: 465 S.W.3d 512
Docket Number: No. ED 101771
Parties: Darius SUMPTER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Lawrence E. Mooney, P.J., Lisa S. Van Amburg, C.J., and Clifford H. Ahrens, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 465
Pages: 512–512

Head Matter:
Darius SUMPTER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 101771
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
FILED: July 14, 2015
Andrew E. Zleit, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101, for appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102, for respondent.
Before Lawrence E. Mooney, P.J., Lisa S. Van Amburg, C.J., and Clifford H. Ahrens, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Darius Sumpter (Movant) appeals the motion court's judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 29.15. We affirm.
The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that were not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).