Case Name: STATE OF OREGON v. LaSPINA
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1963-07-15
Citations: 235 Or. 75
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF OREGON v. LaSPINA
Judges: Before McAllister, Chief Justice, and Perry, O’Connell, Goodwin and Lusk, Justices.
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 235
Pages: 75–75

Head Matter:
Argued July 2,
affirmed July 15, 1963
STATE OF OREGON v. LaSPINA
383 P. 2d 775
William G. Paulus, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were Paulus & Callaghan, Salem.
Gary D. Gortmaker, Deputy District Attorney for Marion County, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief was Hattie Bratzel Kremen, District Attorney for Marion County.
Before McAllister, Chief Justice, and Perry, O’Connell, Goodwin and Lusk, Justices.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The defendant was convicted of the crime of armed robbery and appeals. He assigns as error (1) lack of proper identification of two guns admitted in evidence, and (2) that the sentence of 15 years constitutes cruel and inhuman punishment.
We have carefully reviewed the record. The assignments of error are without merit.
The judgment is affirmed.