Case Name: MARATHON ASHLAND PETROLEUM, LLC, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Gene A. WARMANN and Jerry E. Adams, as Trustee of the Warmann Family Irrevocable Trust, Defendants/Appellants
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-01-27
Citations: 130 S.W.3d 618
Docket Number: No. ED 81710
Parties: MARATHON ASHLAND PETROLEUM, LLC, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Gene A. WARMANN and Jerry E. Adams, as Trustee of the Warmann Family Irrevocable Trust, Defendants/Appellants.
Judges: Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 130
Pages: 618–619

Head Matter:
MARATHON ASHLAND PETROLEUM, LLC, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Gene A. WARMANN and Jerry E. Adams, as Trustee of the Warmann Family Irrevocable Trust, Defendants/Appellants.
No. ED 81710.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Jan. 27, 2004.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 22, 2004.
Application for Transfer Denied April 27, 2004.
Michael A. Gross, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Riezman Berger, P.C., Nelson L. Mitten, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Gene A. Warmann (Warmann), individually, and Jerry Edward Adams, as Trustee of the Warmann Family Irrevocable Trust, appeal the judgment entered in favor of Marathon Ashland Petroleum, LLC, (Marathon) on Marathon's claims for fraudulent conveyance and declaratory judgment arising out of the transfer of property to the Warmann Family Irrevocable Trust on the day judgment was entered in Warmann's dissolution of marriage proceeding.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the trial court's judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
. Another trustee named in the petition, trial. Christina L. Kienstra, was dismissed prior to