Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Dajuan ERBY, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2010-10-19
Citations: 323 S.W.3d 96
Docket Number: No. ED 93744
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Dajuan ERBY, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 323
Pages: 96–96

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Dajuan ERBY, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 93744.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Oct. 19, 2010.
Andrew E. Zleit, St. Louis, MO, for Defendant/Appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, John M. Reeves, Jefferson City, MO, for Plaintiff/Respondent.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
DaJuan Erby appeals from the trial court's judgment convicting him of unlawful use of a weapon and resisting arrest. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not clearly erroneous. State v. Ross, 254 S.W.3d 267, 272-73 (Mo.App. E.D.2008). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).