Case Name: Harold M. SALKIND, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TRAFALGAR HOSPITAL, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1963-10-03
Citations: 322 F.2d 947
Docket Number: No. 11, Docket 28120
Parties: Harold M. SALKIND, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TRAFALGAR HOSPITAL, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 322
Pages: 947–947

Head Matter:
Harold M. SALKIND, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TRAFALGAR HOSPITAL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11, Docket 28120.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued Oct. 1, 1963.
Decided Oct. 3, 1963.
Sidney S. Bobbe, New York City (Holtzmann & Holtzmann, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellant.
Jack H. Hantman, New York City (Joseph Schutzman, Wantagh, N. Y., on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee.
Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and'. FRIENDLY and SMITH, Circuit Judges,.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this action brought October 16, 1959 the amount in controversy is stated to be-$10,000 exclusive of interest and costs. Judgment was entered for plaintiff on a. contract claim for severance pay of one-half the amount of a year's salary of' $20,000, plus interest and costs, and defendant appeals. Jurisdiction is asserted: under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The 1958 amend-, ment to § 1332, however, requires an amount in controversy in excess of $10,-000, exclusive of interest and costs. Jurisdiction was lacking in the District Court. Athan v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 2 Cir. 1934, 73 F.2d 66, Alderman et al. v. Elgin J & E Ry. Co., 7 Cir. 1942, 125. F.2d 971, Royal Ins. Co. of Liverpool, Eng. v. Stoddard, 8 Cir. 1912, 201 F. 915, Queen Ins. Co. of America v. Basham, W.D.Tenn.1962, 201 F.Supp. 733. The judgment of the District Court is reversed: and the case remanded with instructions, to dismiss the action for lack of jurisdiction.