Case Name: In re A.L.C; E.R.S.C., Infants under the age of 16, Andreas Carlwig, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Sarodjiny Carlwig, Respondent-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-04-17
Citations: 783 F.3d 763
Docket Number: No. 14-55671
Parties: In re A.L.C; E.R.S.C., Infants under the age of 16, Andreas Carlwig, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Sarodjiny Carlwig, Respondent-Appellant.
Judges: Before: Harry Pregerson, Ferdinand F. Fernandez, and Jacqueline H. Nguyen, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 783
Pages: 763–763

Head Matter:
In re A.L.C; E.R.S.C., Infants under the age of 16, Andreas Carlwig, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Sarodjiny Carlwig, Respondent-Appellant.
No. 14-55671.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted March 2, 2015.
Filed April 17, 2015.
Matthew' A.' Fitzgerald (argued), Christopher Trible, and Lauren Woods, McGuireWoods LLP, Richmond, VA; Leslie M. Werlin, Dana Palmer, Molly White, Blake Olson, and True Nguyen, McGuire-Woods LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Philip D. Parrish (argued), Philip D. Parrish, P.A., Miami, FA; Lawrence S. Katz, Miami, FA, for Defendant-Appellee.
Erin C. Smith, Nancy K.D. Lemon, and Jennafer Dorfman Wagner, Berkeley, CA; Donald M. Falk, Mayer Brown LLP, Palo Alto, CA, for Amici Curiae Family Violence Appellate Project, California Women’s Law Center, Legal Momentum, Women’s Law Project, and Professor Jane Stoever.
Before: Harry Pregerson, Ferdinand F. Fernandez, and Jacqueline H. Nguyen, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
Sarah Carlwig appeals the decision and order of the district court sending A.L.C. and E.R.S.C., dual-national American and Swedish children, to Sweden pursuant to the Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (the "Convention"), and its implementing legislation, the International Child Abduction Remedies Act, 22 U.S.C.A. § 9001-11. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
We hereby vacate the portion of the district court's order, Carlwig v. Carlwig (In re A.L.C.), 16 F.Supp.3d 1075 (C.D.Cal.2014), concerning the habitual residence of E.R.S.C.
IT IS SO ORDERED.