Case Name: Rhonda RAMIREZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-03-27
Citations: 470 F. App'x 734
Docket Number: No. 11-15128
Parties: Rhonda RAMIREZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 470
Pages: 734–735

Head Matter:
Rhonda RAMIREZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 11-15128
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
March 27, 2012.
Michael A. Steinberg, Michael A. Stein-berg & Associates, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Diane Schulman, Jerome M. Albanese, Megan Elizabeth Gideon, Holly Abernethy A. Grimes, Mary Ann Sloan, Dennis Robert Williams, Social Security Administration, Office of the General Counsel, Atlan ta, GA, Robert E. O’Neill, John F. Rudy, III, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before CARNES, PRYOR and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Rhonda Ramirez appeals the district court's decision affirming the Commissioner's denial of her applications for a period of disability, disability insurance benefits, and supplemental security income benefits. She contends that her "borderline intellectual functioning" was inconsistent with the general learning ability levels required for the jobs the vocational expert determined she could do. She did not raise this issue before the district court, however, and we generally will not consider an argument not raised before the district court. See Kelley v. Apfel, 185 F.3d 1211, 1215 (11th Cir.1999). We decline to do so here.
AFFIRMED.