Case Name: Juan Javier ROMO-JIMENEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2012-05-18
Citations: 114 So. 3d 978
Docket Number: No. 5D09-3270
Parties: Juan Javier ROMO-JIMENEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SAWAYA, COHEN and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 114
Pages: 978–978

Head Matter:
Juan Javier ROMO-JIMENEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D09-3270.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
May 18, 2012.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Thomas J. Lukashow, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Ap-pellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Juan Javier Romo-Jimenez challenges the denial of his motion to suppress recordings obtained following the approval of a wiretap and the trial court's sua sponte restriction of the cross-examination of a co-defendant. In addition, Romo-Jimenez raises a Shelton issue. Finding no error, we affirm. See Flagg v. State, 74 So.3d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). We certify that the same issue reviewed in this case is currently pending before the Florida Supreme Court in State v. Adkins, 71 So.3d 117 (Fla.2011). The mandate will be withheld pending final disposition in Adkins.
AFFIRMED.
SAWAYA, COHEN and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.
. Shelton v. Sec., Dep't of Corr., 802 F.Supp.2d 1289 (M.D.Fla.2011).