Case Name: Johnnie THOMAS, Defendant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-03-09
Citations: 129 S.W.3d 426
Docket Number: No. ED 82928
Parties: Johnnie THOMAS, Defendant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 129
Pages: 426–427

Head Matter:
Johnnie THOMAS, Defendant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 82928.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
March 9, 2004.
Scott Thompson, District Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Evan J. Buchheim, Andrea K. Spillars, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Johnnie Thomas, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court's judgment is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).