Case Name: Michael C. DUNN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2009-02-04
Citations: 2 So. 3d 1067
Docket Number: No. 3D08-3313
Parties: Michael C. DUNN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before COPE, RAMIREZ, and SALTER, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 2
Pages: 1067–1067

Head Matter:
Michael C. DUNN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D08-3313.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 4, 2009.
Michael C. Dunn, in proper person.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before COPE, RAMIREZ, and SALTER, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal of an order summarily denying a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). On appeal from a summary denial, this Court must reverse unless the post-conviction record shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D).
Michael C. Dunn has raised a facially sufficient claim for rule 3.800(a) relief that the trial court, by summarily denying the motion, has failed to conclusively refute. Because the record now before us fails to make the required showing, we reverse the order and remand for further proceedings. On remand, if the trial court again enters an order denying the post-conviction motion, the trial court shall attach written portions of the record conclusively refuting the defendant's claim. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D) (requiring reversal by this Court unless the record shows conclusively that the defendant is entitled to no relief).
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.