Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles William COOK, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-09-16
Citations: 143 F. App'x 860
Docket Number: No. 03-50139
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Charles William COOK, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: HAWKINS and FISHER, Circuit Judges, and WEINER, Senior District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 143
Pages: 860–860

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Charles William COOK, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 03-50139.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Sept. 16, 2005.
Richard Cheng, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Robert L. Swain, Esq., Swain & Vance, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: HAWKINS and FISHER, Circuit Judges, and WEINER, Senior District Judge.
The Honorable Charles R. Weiner, Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
ORDER
The Supreme Court vacated the judgment in this appeal and remanded for reconsideration in light of United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Cook v. United States, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 997, 160 L.Ed.2d 1010 (2005). In accordance with the procedures outlined in United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc), we remand Cook's sentence for the purpose of determining whether the sen-fence imposed would be materially different under Booker.