Case Name: Charles M. Camp, as Executor of Ellen P. Kellogg, Deceased, Appellant, v. Alfred G. Reeves et al., Individually and as Copartners under the Firm Name of Reeves, Todd & Swain et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Others; Ethel T. Kellogg, as Executrix of John P. Kellogg, Deceased, Appellant, v. Alfred G. Reeves et al., Individually and as Copartners under the Firm Name of Reeves, Todd & Swain et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Others; Alva E. Belmont, Appellant, v. Alfred G. Reeves et al., Individually and as Copartners under the Firm Name of Reeves, Todd & Swain et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Others
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1925-10-13
Citations: 241 N.Y. 508
Docket Number: 
Parties: Charles M. Camp, as Executor of Ellen P. Kellogg, Deceased, Appellant, v. Alfred G. Reeves et al., Individually and as Copartners under the Firm Name of Reeves, Todd & Swain et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Others. Ethel T. Kellogg, as Executrix of John P. Kellogg, Deceased, Appellant, v. Alfred G. Reeves et al., Individually and as Copartners under the Firm Name of Reeves, Todd & Swain et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Others. Alva E. Belmont, Appellant, v. Alfred G. Reeves et al., Individually and as Copartners under the Firm Name of Reeves, Todd & Swain et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Others.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 241
Pages: 508–508

Head Matter:
Charles M. Camp, as Executor of Ellen P. Kellogg, Deceased, Appellant, v. Alfred G. Reeves et al., Individually and as Copartners under the Firm Name of Reeves, Todd & Swain et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Others. Ethel T. Kellogg, as Executrix of John P. Kellogg, Deceased, Appellant, v. Alfred G. Reeves et al., Individually and as Copartners under the Firm Name of Reeves, Todd & Swain et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Others. Alva E. Belmont, Appellant, v. Alfred G. Reeves et al., Individually and as Copartners under the Firm Name of Reeves, Todd & Swain et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Others.
(Submitted October 5, 1925;
decided October 13, 1925.)

Opinion:
Motions for re-argument and to amend the remittitur denied, with ten dollars costs of only one motion. (See 240 N. Y. 672.) Held, that on the merits the legal liability of defendants rests solely on contract to disclose the facts of the defalcation of Herbert Reeves and the actions are barred by the Statute of Limitations.