Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Harry L. DANTZLER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-03-01
Citations: 169 F. App'x 173
Docket Number: No. 05-7016
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Harry L. DANTZLER, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 169
Pages: 173–174

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Harry L. DANTZLER, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 05-7016.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 23, 2006.
Decided March 1, 2006.
Harry L. Dantzler, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Barton, Office of the United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Harry L. Dantzler appeals the district court's order denying his motion to amend the complaint, Fed.R.Civ.P. 15. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Dantzler, No. CR-01-831 (D.S.C. June 24, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED