Case Name: BROAN MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. ASSOCIATED DISTRIBUTORS, INC. and Republic Manufacturing and Import Company, Inc., Defendants-Appellants, Cross-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1991-04-29
Citations: 932 F.2d 1146
Docket Number: Nos. 89-6155, 89-6156
Parties: BROAN MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. ASSOCIATED DISTRIBUTORS, INC. and Republic Manufacturing and Import Company, Inc., Defendants-Appellants, Cross-Appellees.
Judges: Before KENNEDY and MILBURN, Circuit Judges, and ENGEL, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 932
Pages: 1146–1146

Head Matter:
BROAN MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. ASSOCIATED DISTRIBUTORS, INC. and Republic Manufacturing and Import Company, Inc., Defendants-Appellants, Cross-Appellees.
Nos. 89-6155, 89-6156.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
April 29, 1991.
John C. Speer, Heiskell, Donelson, Bear-man, Adams, Williams & Kirsch, Memphis, Tenn., Francis W. Deisinger, Stephen T. Jacobs (argued), Christine L. Thierfelder, Reinhart, Boerner, Van Deuren, Norris & Rieselbach, Milwaukee, Wis., for plaintiff-appellee, cross-appellant.
Jef Feibelman (argued), Burch, Porter & Johnson, Memphis, Tenn., Dick Wilson, Jr., Dillard, Greer, Westmoreland & Wilson, Atlanta, Ga., for defendants-appellants, cross-appellees.
Before KENNEDY and MILBURN, Circuit Judges, and ENGEL, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.
Upon consideration of Broan's Motion for Reconsideration of Remand or, in the Alternative, to Dismiss Broan's Cross-Appeal and Affirm the Verdict Without Remand, the court denies Broan's motion for reconsideration and grants Broan's motion to dismiss the cross-appeal.
Although we noted that the District Court did not instruct the jury to reduce future damages to present value, neither party requested such an instruction or objected to its absence. Nor was the issue raised on appeal. Failure to give such an instruction does not amount to plain error in this case. Cf. Kokesh v. American S.S. Co., 747 F.2d 1092, 1095-96 (6th Cir.1984).
Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.