Case Name: Max ROSENBLUM, a/k/a Max A. Rosenblum, Appellant, v. Earmia A. TATHAM, Executrix of the Estate of Victor J. Tatham, Deceased, and Thomas L. Tatham, Attorney for the Estate of Victor J. Tatham, Deceased, Appellees
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1956-03-14
Citations: 86 So. 2d 271
Docket Number: 
Parties: Max ROSENBLUM, a/k/a Max A. Rosenblum, Appellant, v. Earmia A. TATHAM, Executrix of the Estate of Victor J. Tatham, Deceased, and Thomas L. Tatham, Attorney for the Estate of Victor J. Tatham, Deceased, Appellees.
Judges: DREW, C. J., and TERRELL, HOBSON and THORNAL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 86
Pages: 271–271

Head Matter:
Max ROSENBLUM, a/k/a Max A. Rosenblum, Appellant, v. Earmia A. TATHAM, Executrix of the Estate of Victor J. Tatham, Deceased, and Thomas L. Tatham, Attorney for the Estate of Victor J. Tatham, Deceased, Appellees.
Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.
March 14, 1956.
Courshon & Fink, Miami Beach, for appellant.
Joe Creel, Miami, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellees to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to Rule 38 of the Rules of this court, 30 F.S.A., and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;
It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be and the same is hereby granted, and the judgment is
Affirmed.
DREW, C. J., and TERRELL, HOBSON and THORNAL, JJ., concur.