Case Name: Harol R. BEISEL, Plaintiff-Appellant v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-10-11
Citations: 489 F. App'x 147
Docket Number: No. 12-2029
Parties: Harol R. BEISEL, Plaintiff-Appellant v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 489
Pages: 147–147

Head Matter:
Harol R. BEISEL, Plaintiff-Appellant v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 12-2029.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 5, 2012.
Filed: Oct. 11, 2012.
Harol R. Beisel, Springdale, AR, pro se.
Scott T. Vaughn, Hilburn & Calhoon, North Little Rock, AR, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Harol Beisel appeals the district court's dismissal of his civil complaint. Upon our careful de novo review, see McAdams v. McCord, 584 F.3d 1111, 1113 (8th Cir.2009) (standard of review), we find no basis for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Erin Setser, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).