Case Name: James Gamble, Resp't, v. Queens County Water Company et al., App'lts
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1889-01-28
Citations: 20 N.Y. St. Rep. 917
Docket Number: 
Parties: James Gamble, Resp’t, v. Queens County Water Company et al., App’lts.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 20
Pages: 917–918

Head Matter:
James Gamble, Resp’t, v. Queens County Water Company et al., App’lts.
(Supreme Court, General Term First Department,
Filed January 28, 1889.)
Practice—Calendar.
Where the record on appeal contains no findings signed by the judg.-, . the case cannot be’considered by the court, and must be stricken from the calendar.
Appeal by the defendants from, judgment enjoining them from carrying out a resolution for the issuing of stocks and bonds to purchase property proposed to be sold to the defendant by one Robert F. Muffin, who was a trustee thereof.
W. B. Hornblower, for app’lts; James W. Perry, for resp’fc.

Opinion:
Van Brunt, P. J.
This case must be stricken from the calendar, and cannot be considered by the court, because the record contains no findings signed by the judge.
Ordered accordingly.
Macomber and Brady, JJ., concur.