Case Name: DANIEL SIMMONS, Respondent, v. BRADBURY M. RICHARDSON, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1875-07
Citations: 12 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 177
Docket Number: 
Parties: DANIEL SIMMONS, Respondent, v. BRADBURY M. RICHARDSON, Appellant.
Judges: Present — Baenaed, P. J., Tappen and Talcott, JJ.
Reporter: Supreme Court Reports (Hun)
Volume: 12
Pages: 177–177

Head Matter:
DANIEL SIMMONS, Respondent, v. BRADBURY M. RICHARDSON, Appellant.
General finding — effect of— Tiow corrected,.
Where, upon tie trial of an action before tie court without a jury, a finding is too general, tie party injured thereby siould ask a more specific one. If ic suffers it to stand and the evidence returned shows no error, tie judgment must be affirmed tie same as if entered upon the verdict of a jury.
Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon the trial of this action by the court, without a jury.
PL. A. Nelson, for appellant. Bevy. H. Bayliss, for respondent.

Opinion:
Opinion by
Baenaed, P. J.
Present — Baenaed, P. J., Tappen and Talcott, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, witb costs.