Case Name: Jose FERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2005-09-14
Citations: 910 So. 2d 352
Docket Number: No. 3D05-1240
Parties: Jose FERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before COPE, C.J., and SHEPHERD and ROTHENBERG, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 910
Pages: 352–352

Head Matter:
Jose FERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D05-1240.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Sept. 14, 2005.
Jose Fernandez, in proper person.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, for appellee.
Before COPE, C.J., and SHEPHERD and ROTHENBERG, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Jose Fernandez, appeals the denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion, brought pursuant to Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004). Because Blakely does not apply retroactively to cases on collateral review that became final prior to issuance of that decision, we affirm. See Clark v. State, 903 So.2d 292, 293 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Reed v. State, 898 So.2d 1204 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Burgal v. State, 888 So.2d 702 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004); McBride v. State, 884 So.2d 476, 478 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). We do not address the appellant's claim that his sentence was disproportionate because such a claim is not cognizable on a motion to correct illegal sentence. See Lykins v. State, 894 So.2d 302, 303 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005).
Affirmed.