Case Name: Winchester v. Browne
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1889-07-09
Citations: 6 N.Y.S. 913
Docket Number: 
Parties: Winchester v. Browne.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 6
Pages: 913–913

Head Matter:
Winchester v. Browne.
(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.
July 9, 1889.)
Costs on Appeal.
When an order for a substitution of an undertaking is granted, and the surety fails to justify, the order on appeal should be affirmed, but without costs. Daniels, J., dissenting.
Appeal from special term, New York county.
Appeal from an order allowing an undertaking as security for costs, executed by the Fidelity & Casualty Company, to be substituted for a preceding undertaking proposed to be given in the action.
Argued before Van Brunt, P. J., and Brady and Daniels, JJ.
Henry Schmitt, for appellant. A. Walker Otis, {T. S. Moore, of counsel,) for respondent.

Opinion:
Van Brunt, P. J.
We see no error in allowing the substitution of the undertaking in question, but as, in our judgment, the substituted surety has failed to justify, the order should be affirmed, without costs.
Brady, J., concurs.