Case Name: Alfred T. THOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Christy T. MANN, Judge; MecKlenburg County General District & Circuit Courts; McDowell Street Center for Family Law, Incorporated; Donna Jackson; Aida Correa; Peter Gorman; James G. Middlebrooks; Graham C. Mullen; North Carolina, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-01-14
Citations: 361 F. App'x 459
Docket Number: No. 09-1342
Parties: Alfred T. THOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Christy T. MANN, Judge; MecKlenburg County General District & Circuit Courts; McDowell Street Center for Family Law, Incorporated; Donna Jackson; Aida Correa; Peter Gorman; James G. Middlebrooks; Graham C. Mullen; North Carolina, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 361
Pages: 459–460

Head Matter:
Alfred T. THOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Christy T. MANN, Judge; MecKlenburg County General District & Circuit Courts; McDowell Street Center for Family Law, Incorporated; Donna Jackson; Aida Correa; Peter Gorman; James G. Middlebrooks; Graham C. Mullen; North Carolina, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 09-1342.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 23, 2009.
Decided: Jan. 14, 2010.
Alfred T. Thomas, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
ON REHEARING
PER CURIAM:
Alfred T. Thomas appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil rights complaint based upon a previously issued prefiling injunction. Although we initially dismissed this appeal on the ground that Thomas failed to file a timely notice of appeal, we granted Thomas' petition for panel rehearing and now consider the merits of the appeal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thomas v. Mann, No. 3:08-cv-00502-FDW-l (W.D.N.C. Jan. 23, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Because no member of the court called for a vote on Thomas' petition for rehearing en banc, the petition was denied. See 4th Cir. R. 35(b).