Case Name: Elizes CHAVEZ, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2013-03-19
Citations: 393 S.W.3d 669
Docket Number: No. ED 98423
Parties: Elizes CHAVEZ, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 393
Pages: 669–670

Head Matter:
Elizes CHAVEZ, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 98423.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District.
March 19, 2013.
Mark A. Grothoff, Columbia, MO, for Movant/Appellant.
Andrew C. Hooper, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent/Respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Elizes Chavez appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k); Burston v. State, 348 S.W.3d 691, 693 (Mo.App. E.D.2011). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2011, unless otherwise indicated.