Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Donald P. SEWARD, Appellant; Donald F. SEWARD, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-02-10
Citations: 961 S.W.2d 917
Docket Number: Nos. 68803, 72401
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Donald P. SEWARD, Appellant. Donald F. SEWARD, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before AHRENS, P.J., and CRANDALL and KAROHL, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 961
Pages: 917–917

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Donald P. SEWARD, Appellant. Donald F. SEWARD, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 68803, 72401.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Feb. 10, 1998.
Ellen H. Flottman, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Catherine Chatman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before AHRENS, P.J., and CRANDALL and KAROHL, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appealed after concurrent sentences on charges of assault first degree, armed criminal action and unlawful use of a weapon. He also appeals denial of Rule 29.15 post conviction relief after an evidentia-ry hearing. We hold the trial court did not err in submitting MAI-CR 3d 310.50 at the request of the state which instructed the jury that an intoxicated condition from alcohol will not relieve a person of responsibility for his conduct. We also hold the findings, conclusions and decision of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears and an extended opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their use only. The judgments are affirmed. Rule 30.25(b) and Rule 84.16(b).