Case Name: The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Higgins, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1996-01-31
Citations: 74 Ohio St. 3d 410
Docket Number: No. 95-1892
Parties: The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Higgins, Appellant.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 74
Pages: 410–411

Head Matter:
The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Higgins, Appellant.
[Cite as State v. Higgins (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 410.]
(No. 95-1892
Submitted November 14, 1995
Decided January 31, 1996.)
Mathias H. Heck, Jr., Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney, and Carley J. Ingram, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
Valerie Higgins, pro se.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Having examined the same portions of the record as the court of appeals, we come to the same conclusion. The trial court advised appellant of the maximum term of incarceration, as required by Crim.R. 11(C)(2), and appellant and her counsel executed the entry of waiver and plea, which stated the period of actual incarceration. Accordingly, there is no genuine issue indicating ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, and the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.