Case Name: Barry DEABORN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2008-06-06
Citations: 987 So. 2d 101
Docket Number: No. 5D07-912
Parties: Barry DEABORN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SAWAYA, MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 987
Pages: 101–101

Head Matter:
Barry DEABORN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D07-912.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
June 6, 2008.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volu-sia County, J. David Walsh, Judge; Frank Marriott, Jr., Judge; James R. Clayton, Judge.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Kevin R. Holtz, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The issue presented by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in its consideration of the motion of the appellant, Barry Deaborn, to correct an illegal sentence. The appellant is partially correct. Accordingly, this case is remanded to the trial court to delete the designation of the appellant as a sexual predator and to delete the requirement for electronic monitoring, if that has not already been accomplished, and instead to designate the appellant as a sexual offender pursuant to section 943.0435(l)(a)l.a.(I) and (II), Florida Statutes (2007). See Ames v. State, 870 So.2d 203 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004), review denied, 917 So.2d 191 (Fla.2005). The judgment and sentence are otherwise affirmed as rendered.
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.
SAWAYA, MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.