Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Franklyn Earl BANNERMAN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-12-05
Citations: 257 F. App'x 631
Docket Number: No. 07-6920
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Franklyn Earl BANNERMAN, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 257
Pages: 631–632

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Franklyn Earl BANNERMAN, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 07-6920.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 19, 2007.
Decided: Dec. 5, 2007.
Franklyn Earl Bannerman, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Franklyn Earl Bannerman appeals the district court's order denying his motion filed pursuant to former Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Bannerman, No. 2:90-cr-00105-HCM, 2007 WL 1519051 (E.D.Va. May 17, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.