Case Name: Bernard W. Shane, Appellant, v. Alfonso Miele, Doing Business as Miele Auto Sales and Repair Co., Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1959-06-16
Citations: 18 Misc. 2d 439
Docket Number: 
Parties: Bernard W. Shane, Appellant, v. Alfonso Miele, Doing Business as Miele Auto Sales and Repair Co., Respondent.
Judges: Concur — Pette, Hart and Brown, JJ.
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 18
Pages: 439–440

Head Matter:
Bernard W. Shane, Appellant, v. Alfonso Miele, Doing Business as Miele Auto Sales and Repair Co., Respondent.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
June 16, 1959.
Paltrow & Paltrow for appellant.
No appearance for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment should be unanimously reversed on the law and facts, with $10 costs to plaintiff and a new trial ordered.
The trial court's rulings with respect to damages and refusal to grant plaintiff an adjournment for the purpose of securing counsel and obtaining additional evidence of damages sustained, require a new trial in the interests of substantial justice.
Concur — Pette, Hart and Brown, JJ.
Judgment reversed, etc.