Case Name: The STATE, Respondent, v. Carolyn P. STEPHENS, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jurisdiction: South Carolina
Decision Date: 1983-03-23
Citations: 279 S.C. 33
Docket Number: 21889
Parties: The STATE, Respondent, v. Carolyn P. STEPHENS, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Carolina Reports
Volume: 279
Pages: 33–34

Head Matter:
21889
The STATE, Respondent, v. Carolyn P. STEPHENS, Appellant.
(301 S. E. (2d) 473)
George M. Stuckey, Jr., and Paul M. Fata, of Stuckey Law Firm, Bishopville, for appellant.
Atty. Gen. T. Travis Medlock, Retired Atty. Gen. Daniel R. McLeod and Asst. Attys. Gen. Harold M. Coombs, Jr., and Martha L. McElveen, Columbia, and Sol. R. Kirk McLeod, Sumter, for respondent.
March 23, 1983.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
Appellant appeals from the lower court's order vacating its earlier order granting appellant a new trial.
The record submitted by appellant does not contain sufficient facts for this Court to consider the propriety of the lower court's action. Appellant has not met her burden of presenting a record on which the Court can base a decision. State v. Winestock, 271 S. C. 473, 248 S. E. (2d) 307 (1978).
We dismiss appellant's appeal.