Case Name: Anne F. Bond et al., Appellants, v. Rita J. DeMasco et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2011-05-31
Citations: 84 A.D.3d 1292
Docket Number: 
Parties: Anne F. Bond et al., Appellants, v Rita J. DeMasco et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 84
Pages: 1292–1293

Head Matter:
Anne F. Bond et al., Appellants, v Rita J. DeMasco et al., Respondents.
[923 NYS2d 902]

Opinion:
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Fusco, J.), dated December 20, 2010, which denied, as premature, their motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the plaintiffs' contention, the Supreme Court properly denied, as premature, their motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability (see CPLR 3212 [f]; Lambert v Sklar, 61 AD3d 939, 940 [2009]; Aurora Loan Servs., LLC v LaMattina & Assoc., Inc., 59 AD3d 578 [2009]). The plaintiffs moved for summary judgment on the issue of liability prior to the parties' depositions. The defendants did not have an adequate opportunity to conduct discovery (see Amico v Melville Volunteer Fire Co., Inc., 39 AD3d 784, 785 [2007]). Moreover, the plaintiff Anne F. Bond and the defendant Rita J. DeMasco submitted, among other things, affidavits containing certain discrepancies pertaining to the circumstances of the subject accident (see Gardner v Cason, Inc., 82 AD3d 930 [2011]; Cardone v Poidamani, 73 AD3d 828 [2010]). Mastro, J.P., Leventhal, Austin and Cohen, JJ., concur.