Case Name: The State, ex rel. Frye, Exr., v. MacConkey, Probate Judge
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1940-03-27
Citations: 136 Ohio St. 462
Docket Number: No. 28043
Parties: The State, ex rel. Frye, Exr., v. MacConkey, Probate Judge.
Judges: Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Myers, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, New Service
Volume: 136
Pages: 462–462

Head Matter:
The State, ex rel. Frye, Exr., v. MacConkey, Probate Judge.
(No. 28043
Decided March 27, 1940.)
Mr. Frank C. Leyshon, for relator.
Mr. Jess J. Fasekas, Messrs. Moore £ Moore, Mr. George D. Dugan and Mr. James W. Bell, for respondent. .

Opinion:
By the Court.
A writ of mandamus will not lie to control judicial discretion. Section 12285, Q-eneral Code.
A writ of prohibition cannot be invoked as a substitute for an appeal and will not be issued to prevent an anticipated erroneous judgment. State, ex rel. Norris, v. Hodapp, Judge, 135 Ohio St., 26, 18 N. E. (2d), 984, and authorities cited therein.
Demurrer to petition sustained and writs denied.
Writs denied.
Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Myers, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.