Case Name: Daniel Wayne ORR; F.A. O., a minor; L.D. O., a minor, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, Division of Mental Illness and Substance Abuse; Wake County Department Of Social Services, Adult Protective Services; Ramon Rajono, Director of Adult Protective Services; Craig Burris, Director of Senior Services; Glenda Reed, Elderly Services, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-12-23
Citations: 548 F. App'x 926
Docket Number: No. 13-2322
Parties: Daniel Wayne ORR; F.A. O., a minor; L.D. O., a minor, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, Division of Mental Illness and Substance Abuse; Wake County Department Of Social Services, Adult Protective Services; Ramon Rajono, Director of Adult Protective Services; Craig Burris, Director of Senior Services; Glenda Reed, Elderly Services, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 548
Pages: 926–927

Head Matter:
Daniel Wayne ORR; F.A. O., a minor; L.D. O., a minor, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, Division of Mental Illness and Substance Abuse; Wake County Department Of Social Services, Adult Protective Services; Ramon Rajono, Director of Adult Protective Services; Craig Burris, Director of Senior Services; Glenda Reed, Elderly Services, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 13-2322.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 19, 2013.
Decided: Dec. 23, 2013.
Daniel Wayne Orr, Appellant Pro Se.
Roger A. Askew, Wake County Attorney’s Office, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Daniel Wayne Orr and two minor Appellants appeal the district court's order dismissing their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint as frivolous, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Orr v. N.C. Dep't of Health & Human Servs., No. 5:13-cv-00671-D (E.D.N.C. Oct. 16, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.