Case Name: STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Rodney V. PARKER, Appellant
Court: Minnesota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Minnesota
Decision Date: 1996-02-05
Citations: 543 N.W.2d 93
Docket Number: No. C4-95-426
Parties: STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Rodney V. PARKER, Appellant.
Judges: PAGE, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Reporter: North Western Reporter 2d
Volume: 543
Pages: 93–94

Head Matter:
STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Rodney V. PARKER, Appellant.
No. C4-95-426.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
Feb. 5, 1996.

Opinion:
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the court of appeals filed September 26, 1995, affirming the conviction of Rodney Y. Parker of driving while under the influence of alcohol within 5 years of a prior impaired-driving conviction be, and the same is, affirmed. Parker contends that the revocation of his driver's license pursuant to the implied consent law barred the subsequent criminal prosecution under the double jeopardy clause. This contention is answered by our decision in State v. Hanson, 543 N.W.2d 84 (Minn.1996). The decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Alexander M. Keith A.M. KEITH Chief Justice
PAGE, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.