Case Name: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Sheatsley
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1995-05-24
Citations: 72 Ohio St. 3d 244
Docket Number: No. 95-9
Parties: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Sheatsley.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 72
Pages: 244–245

Head Matter:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Sheatsley.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Sheatsley (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 244.]
(No. 95-9
Submitted February 7, 1995
Decided May 24, 1995.)
Geoffrey Stem, Disciplinary Counsel, and Sally Ann Steuk, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.
James R. Sheatsley, pro se.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
As respondent has offered no reason why he should not receive discipline comparable to that imposed by the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia, we hereby publicly reprimand respondent. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.