Case Name: R. M. Reeves et al. v. The State
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1928-04-11
Citations: 109 Tex. Crim. 462
Docket Number: Nos. 11680, 11681, 11682, and 11683
Parties: R. M. Reeves et al. v. The State.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Criminal Reports
Volume: 109
Pages: 462–463

Head Matter:
R. M. Reeves et al. v. The State.
Nos. 11680, 11681, 11682 and 11683.
Delivered April 11, 1928.
The opinion in the case of R. M. Reeves et al., No. 11679, states the facts in. these cases..
Barry Miller, W. B. Harrell and J. D. Kugle of Dallas, for appellants.
A. A. Dawson of Canton, State’s Attorney, for the State.

Opinion:
MARTIN, JUDGE.
The legal question in this case is identical with that of R. M. Reeves et al., Appellants, v. State of Texas, Appellee, No. 11679, decided March 21, 1928.
For the reasons pointed out in the opinion in said cause No. 11679, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.