Case Name: Willie Lee BERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M. Timothy PORTERFIELD, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-02-25
Citations: 312 F. App'x 578
Docket Number: No. 08-7857
Parties: Willie Lee BERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M. Timothy PORTERFIELD, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 312
Pages: 578–579

Head Matter:
Willie Lee BERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M. Timothy PORTERFIELD, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 08-7857.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 19, 2009.
Decided: Feb. 25, 2009.
Willie Lee Berry, Appellant Pro. Se.
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Willie Lee Berry appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Berry v. Porterfield, No. 3:08-cv-00311-GCM (W.D.N.C. Aug. 1, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.