Case Name: John A. SEGURA-NEIRA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-04-23
Citations: 600 F. App'x 543
Docket Number: No. 11-71453
Parties: John A. SEGURA-NEIRA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: KLEINFELD, McKEOWN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 600
Pages: 543–544

Head Matter:
John A. SEGURA-NEIRA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 11-71453.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 6, 2015.
Filed April 23, 2015.
John A. Segura-Neira, Studio City, CA, pro se.
Matthew B. George, OIL, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
Before: KLEINFELD, McKEOWN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
John A. Segura-Neira petitions for review of the BIA's determination that he was properly found subject to removal. Because the parties are familiar with the facts and procedural history of this case, we repeat only those facts necessary to resolve the issues raised on appeal. We deny the petition.
Segura is removable pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)®, which provides: "Any alien who is convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude committed within five years . after the date of admission, and is convicted of a crime for which a sentence of one year or longer may be imposed, is deportable."
Segura was convicted of grand theft of personal property under CaLPenal Code § 487(a). Grand theft is a crime involving moral turpitude. Rashtabadi v. INS, 28 F.3d 1562, 1568 (9th Cir.1994). Grand theft is punishable "by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year." CaLPenal Code § 489(c).
Segura argues that we should consider that while the initial offense was a felony, it was later reduced to a misdemeanor. However, regardless of whether the conviction was for á misdemeanor or a felony, the punishment for the offense can be one year. See Cal.Penal Code § 489(c). CaLPenal Code § 19 does not help Segura. That statute provides that "[ejxcept in eases where a different punishment is prescribed by any law of this state, every offense declared to be a misdemeanor is punishable by imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding six months." CaLPenal Code § 19. As we recently explained in Ceron v. Holder.
California Penal Code section 19 specifies a general statutory maximum penalty of six months' imprisonment in the county jail for all misdemeanors, 11 [ejx-cept in cases where a different punishment is prescribed by any law of this state." (Emphasis added.) That is, whenever the criminal statute in question prescribes a different maximum penalty, the six-month default maximum simply does not apply.
747 F.3d 773, 778 (9th Cir.2014) (en banc). Such is the case here. CaLPenal Code § 489(c) prescribes a different maximum penalty for a grand theft misdemeanor— imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year — and thus "the default statutory maximum of six months, prescribed by section 19, is inapplicable." Id. Therefore, because Segura meets all requirements under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)®, he is deportable.
PETITION DENIED.
This disposition is not'appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.