Case Name: David Alan HUNTER, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Cheryl A. HUNTER, Respondent/Cross-Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-09-05
Citations: 200 S.W.3d 561
Docket Number: No. ED 86925
Parties: David Alan HUNTER, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Cheryl A. HUNTER, Respondent/Cross-Appellant.
Judges: Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 200
Pages: 561–562

Head Matter:
David Alan HUNTER, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Cheryl A. HUNTER, Respondent/Cross-Appellant.
No. ED 86925.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Sept. 5, 2006.
Michele Hammond, Scott Chandler Trout, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Nathan S. Cohen, Clayton, MO, for respondent.
Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
David Alan Hunter appeals from the judgment and amended judgment of the trial court dissolving his marriage to Cheryl A. Hunter. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in its award of maintenance or its division of marital property. Halupa v. Halupa, 943 S.W.2d 272, 277 (Mo.App. E.D.1997). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).