Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Paul B. DAY, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-12-16
Citations: 122 S.W.3d 717
Docket Number: No. ED 83024
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Paul B. DAY, Appellant.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL JR., J„ and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 122
Pages: 717–718

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Paul B. DAY, Appellant.
No. ED 83024.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Dec. 16, 2003.
Paul B. Day, Jefferson City, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Charnette D. Douglass, Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL JR., J„ and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
Paul B. Day ("Day") appeals the judgment of the trial court denying his motion to correct a manifest injustice, which was filed pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.07. Day claims that his guilty plea to the charge of possession of a controlled substance with the intent to deliver, in violation of section 195.211 RSMo (1996), was involuntarily made. Additionally, Day claims that his guilty plea was not made with an understanding of the charges because he was charged with one crime and sentenced for another.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).