Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jorge ROJAS-VELASQUEZ, aka Jorge Rojas aka Jorge Alvarado Velasquez, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-04-22
Citations: 61 F. App'x 509
Docket Number: No. 02-10269; D.C. No. CR-00-05426-REC
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jorge ROJAS-VELASQUEZ, aka Jorge Rojas aka Jorge Alvarado Velasquez, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before B. FLETCHER, KOZINSKI and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 61
Pages: 509–509

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jorge ROJAS-VELASQUEZ, aka Jorge Rojas aka Jorge Alvarado Velasquez, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 02-10269.
D.C. No. CR-00-05426-REC.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted April 4, 2003.
Decided April 22, 2003.
Before B. FLETCHER, KOZINSKI and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
We lack jurisdiction to review the denial of the motion to dismiss because Rojas-Velasquez entered an unconditional guilty plea. See United States v. Floyd, 108 F.3d 202, 203-04 (9th Cir.1997). We lack jurisdiction to review the refusal to depart downward because the record does not show that the district court mistakenly believed it had no authority to depart. See United States v. Berger, 103 F.3d 67, 69-70 (9th Cir.1996).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.