Case Name: Corey Samuel WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2017-12-15
Citations: 230 So. 3d 1287
Docket Number: Case No. 5D17-2290
Parties: Corey Samuel WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SAWAYA, PALMER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 230
Pages: 1287–1288

Head Matter:
Corey Samuel WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Case No. 5D17-2290
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Opinion filed December 15, 2017
Corey Samuel Wright, Orlando, pro se.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Ap-pellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Corey Samuel Wright, appeals the trial court's denial of a rule 3.800(a) motion challenging his designation as a sexual predator. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.800(a).
Appellant pled to one count of lewd or lascivious battery pursuant to section 800.04(4)(a), Florida Statutes (2016). The trial court sentenced Appellant according to the plea agreement to time served and five years of sex offender probation, and designated him a sexual predator.
A defendant will be designated a sexual predator pursuant to section 775.21(4), Florida Statutes, (1) if he or she was convicted of a capital, life, or first-degree felony violation of several enumerated statutory sections, or (2) if he or she was convicted of any qualifying felony and he or she has previously been convicted of any qualifying, violation listed in section 775.21(4)(a)1.b., Florida Statutes (2016).
Here, Appellant was not convicted of a capital, life, or first-degree felony. He was convicted of a second-degree felony under section 800.04(4)(a), which is a qualifying felony. However, the State properly concedes the record does not conclusively demonstrate that he has a previous qualifying conviction listed in ' section 775.21(4)(a)l.b., Florida Statutes (2016). Therefore, we reverse and remand for the trial court to attach record evidence demonstrating that Appellant qualifies for a sexual predator designation, or in the alternative, to strike the designation.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
SAWAYA, PALMER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.