Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Humberto CHACON-IBARRA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-03-06
Citations: 678 F. App'x 255
Docket Number: No. 16-51047
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Humberto CHACON-IBARRA, Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 678
Pages: 255–255

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Humberto CHACON-IBARRA, Defendant-Appellant
No. 16-51047
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed March 6, 2017
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Bradford W. Bogan, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Maureen Scott Franco, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for faefendant-Appel-lant
Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
This Defendant has been twice deported and had not always observed the law while in this country. He has been sentenced to 30 months in prison, but his guidelines range was erroneously enhanced and his sentence has been suspended.
The error was the enhancement of offense points for a crime where sentence was fully suspended. It was a plain error. United States v. Rodriguez-Parra, 581 F.3d 227 (5th Cir. 2009). The elements of plain error have been satisfied, and we vacate for resentencing.
VACATED and REMANDED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.