Case Name: M. ZWISLER v. AETNA LIFE CO.; and A. ZWISLER v. M. ZWISLER
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1923-05-16
Citations: 1 Ohio Law Abs. 614
Docket Number: Nos. 746 and 750
Parties: M. ZWISLER v. AETNA LIFE CO. and A. ZWISLER v. M. ZWISLER
Judges: 
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 1
Pages: 614–614

Head Matter:
No. 646
M. ZWISLER v. AETNA LIFE CO. and A. ZWISLER v. M. ZWISLER
Nos. 746 and 750.
Decided May 16, 1923
This opinion has not been published except in Abstract.
INSURANCE — Change of beneficiary without consent of party to insurance contract.
Attorneys — J. Taylor, for M. Zwisler; May, Roetzel, Zesiger & May, for A. Zwisler.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Epitomized Opinion
Controversy between A. and M. Zwisler as to the proceeds of insurance policy on the life of A. J. Zwisler, the son of A. Zwisler, and the husband of M. Zwisler. Both A. and M. Zwisler brought separate actions against the Aetna Co., which Company filed an interpleader, brought the money into court, was discharged from proceedings, and the cases were consolidated. By the terms of the policy the beneficiary could not be changed without the written consent of the Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co. The beneficiary was changed from M. Zwisler to A. Zwisler without this written consent. The trial court found for M. Zwisler and ordered the money paid over to her. A. Zwisler prosecuted both error and appeal. M. Zwisler contended the case is not appealable. In affirming the judgment, the Court of Appeals held:
1. As interpleader was a chancery proceeding before there was a statute governing it, the case is appealable.
2. Where insurance contract requires written consent of a party to change beneficiary, such change, without this written consent, is ineffectual.