Case Name: THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF, v. JOHN BORG AND CHARLES ROSENBERG, DEFENDANTS
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1930-09-08
Citations: 8 N.J. Misc. 705
Docket Number: 
Parties: THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF, v. JOHN BORG AND CHARLES ROSENBERG, DEFENDANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 8
Pages: 705–705

Head Matter:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF, v. JOHN BORG AND CHARLES ROSENBERG, DEFENDANTS.
Submitted May 16, 1930
Decided September 8, 1930.
Before Justices Campbell and Bodine.
For the state, Edward O. West and Andrew 0. Wittreich.
For the defendant John Borg, Garey & Lane and MacTcay & MacTcay.
For the defendant Charles Eosenberg, Samuel Denson.

Opinion:
Pee Ctieiam.
An examination of the record in this case leads us to the conclusion that the memorandum filed by Mr. Justice Parker is a concise and accurate statement of the law of this state.
The motion to require a member of the grand jury to answer the questions asked will be denied.