Case Name: HYDRAULIC PRESS BRICK COMPANY v. MORTGAGE LAND INVESTMENT COMPANY; E. A. ENGLER LUMBER COMPANY v. MORTGAGE LAND INVESTMENT COMPANY
Court: Minnesota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Minnesota
Decision Date: 1919-05-09
Citations: 142 Minn. 497
Docket Number: No. 21,200
Parties: HYDRAULIC PRESS BRICK COMPANY v. MORTGAGE LAND INVESTMENT COMPANY. E. A. ENGLER LUMBER COMPANY v. MORTGAGE LAND INVESTMENT COMPANY.
Judges: 
Reporter: Minnesota Reports
Volume: 142
Pages: 497–497

Head Matter:
HYDRAULIC PRESS BRICK COMPANY v. MORTGAGE LAND INVESTMENT COMPANY. E. A. ENGLER LUMBER COMPANY v. MORTGAGE LAND INVESTMENT COMPANY.
May 9, 1919.
No. 21,200.
Foreclosure of mechanic’s lien.
Findings in favor of plaintiff sustained by the evidence. [Reporter]
Action in the district court for Hennepin county to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. Defendants interposed a counterclaim for $12,000. The case was tried before Steele, J., who made findings and ordered judgment in favor of plaintiff. From an order denying its motion for amended findings or for a new trial, defendant investment company appealed.
Affirmed.
Henry Ebert and Charles B. Elliott, for appellant.
Josiah E. Brill and Maurice Rose, for respondent.
Reported in 172 N. W. 958.

Opinion:
Pee CUBIAM.
Action for the foreclosure of a mechanic's lien, and the recovery of the value of lumber and building material sold and delivered to defendants. A trial before the court without a jury resulted in findings of fact and an order for judgment in plaintiff's favor. Defendants appealed from an order denying their motion for amended findings or a new trial.
The only question presented is whether the evidence supports the findings of the trial court. A careful reading of the record leads to an affirmance. We find sufficient evidence to support the findings that the material for which recovery was demanded was in fact delivered to defendants as alleged in the complaint. A discussion of the evidence is- unncessary.
Order affirmed.