Case Name: State of Nebraska, appellee, v. Jack Lee Ernest, appellant
Court: Nebraska Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Nebraska
Decision Date: 1972-06-16
Citations: 188 Neb. 648
Docket Number: No. 38398
Parties: State of Nebraska, appellee, v. Jack Lee Ernest, appellant.
Judges: Heard before Spencer, Boslaugh, Smith, McCown, Newton, and Clinton, JJ.
Reporter: Nebraska Reports
Volume: 188
Pages: 648–649

Head Matter:
State of Nebraska, appellee, v. Jack Lee Ernest, appellant.
198 N. W. 2d 335
Filed June 16, 1972.
No. 38398.
Jack Lee Ernest, pro se.
Clarence A. H. Meyer, Attorney General, and Ralph H. Gillan, for appellee.
Heard before Spencer, Boslaugh, Smith, McCown, Newton, and Clinton, JJ.

Opinion:
McCown, J.
The defendant pleaded nolo contendere to a charge of receiving stolen goods. He was found guilty and sentenced to a term of 5 years in the Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex. The only issue on appeal is his claim that the sentence was excessive.
There is no factual dispute. The record affirmatively discloses that as a part of a plea bargain, an habitual criminal charge against the defendant was dismissed. The sentence authorized by statute for the crime of receiving stolen property is 1 to 7 years. The minimum term on an habitual criminal count is 10 years. There is no presentence investigation report in the record.
A sentence imposed within statutory limits will not ordinarily be disturbed in the absence of an abuse of judicial discretion. State v. Meloy, ante p. 98, 195 N. W. 2d 173. There was no abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court here.
Affirmed.