Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven R. HARDY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-08-27
Citations: 488 F. App'x 383
Docket Number: No. 12-11140
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven R. HARDY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before BARKETT, PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 488
Pages: 383–383

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven R. HARDY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-11140
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Aug. 27, 2012.
Michelle Thresher Taylor, Robert E. O’Neill, Yvette Rhodes, Christopher P. Tuite, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Tracy N. DaCruz, Rosemary Cakmis, Donna Lee Elm, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Orlando, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Steven R. Hardy, Coleman, FL, pro se.
Before BARKETT, PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Tracy N. DaCruz, appointed counsel for Steven Hardy in this appeal of the denial of an 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the denial of Hardy's § 3582(c)(2) motion is AFFIRMED.