Case Name: The State of Ohio, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. Meador, Appellee and Cross-Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2009-11-10
Citations: 123 Ohio St. 3d 450
Docket Number: No. 2009-0884
Parties: The State of Ohio, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. Meador, Appellee and Cross-Appellant.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 123
Pages: 450–451

Head Matter:
The State of Ohio, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. Meador, Appellee and Cross-Appellant.
[Cite as State v. Meador, 123 Ohio St.3d 450, 2009-Ohio-5861.]
(No. 2009-0884
Submitted October 20, 2009
Decided November 10, 2009.)
Rachel A. Hutzel, Warren County Prosecuting Attorney, and Michael Greer, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant and cross-appellee.
Fred S. Miller; and Repper, Pagan & Cook, Ltd. and Christopher J. Pagan, for appellee and cross-appellant.

Opinion:
{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is not accepted.
{¶ 2} The discretionary cross-appeal is accepted.
{¶ 3} The judgment of the court of appeals holding as moot the assignment of error in which appellant below challenged the sufficiency of the evidence is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for consideration of that assignment of error.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded.
Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.