Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Manuel Antonio PATINO-DE LA TORRE, also known as Gamaliel Bustos-Valverde, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-06-16
Citations: 428 F. App'x 457
Docket Number: No. 10-41245
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Manuel Antonio PATINO-DE LA TORRE, also known as Gamaliel Bustos-Valverde, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before REAVLEY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 428
Pages: 457–457

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Manuel Antonio PATINO-DE LA TORRE, also known as Gamaliel Bustos-Valverde, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-41245
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
June 16, 2011.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Sarah Beth Landau, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Margaret Christina Ling, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Manuel Antonio Patino-De La Torre, Karnes City, TX, pro se.
Before REAVLEY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Manuel Antonio Patino-De La Torre has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Patino-De La Torre has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.