Case Name: S. Dimon Smith, Respondent, v. Dayton Hedges, Appellant; Same, Respondent, v. Same, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1916-01-04
Citations: 216 N.Y. 761
Docket Number: 
Parties: S. Dimon Smith, Respondent, v. Dayton Hedges, Appellant. Same, Respondent, v. Same, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 216
Pages: 761–762

Head Matter:
S. Dimon Smith, Respondent, v. Dayton Hedges, Appellant. Same, Respondent, v. Same, Appellant.
Reported below, 169 App. Div. 115.
(Submitted January 3, 1916;
decided January 4, 1916.)
Motion, in each of the above-entitled actions, to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered November 24,1915, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff. entered upon a verdict directed by the court.
The motions were made upon the grounds that the actions were brought to recover compensation for services; that the affirmance by the Appellate Division was unanimous; that permission to appeal had not been obtained, and that the exceptions were frivolous.
Gustav Lange, Jr., for motion.
John B. Vunk opposed.

Opinion:
Motions denied, without costs.