Case Name: Lehmann, Officer in Charge, Immigration and Naturalization Service, v. United States ex rel. Carson or Carasaniti; Rabang v. Boyd, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service; Jackson v. Taylor, Acting Warden; Fowler v. Wilkinson, Warden; Smith v. United States; Lelles v. United States; Markham et al. v. Burchfield et al.; Lebron v. United States; Cepero v. Pan American World Airways et al.; Luciano v. Wilkinson, Warden
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1957-07-08
Citations: 354 U.S. 944
Docket Number: No. 72; No. 403; No. 619; No. 620; No. 820; No. 922; No. 939; No. 677; No. 775; No. 795
Parties: Lehmann, Officer in Charge, Immigration and Naturalization Service, v. United States ex rel. Carson or Carasaniti, Rabang v. Boyd, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Jackson v. Taylor, Acting Warden, Fowler v. Wilkinson, Warden, Smith v. United States, Lelles v. United States, Markham et al. v. Burchfield et al., Lebron v. United States, Cepero v. Pan American World Airways et al., Luciano v. Wilkinson, Warden,
Judges: Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 354
Pages: 944–944

Head Matter:
July 8, 1957.
No. 72.
No. 403.
No. 619.
No. 620.
No. 820.
No. 922.
No. 939.
No. 677,
No. 775,
No. 795,
Misc.
Misc.
Misc.
Lehmann, Officer in Charge, Immigration and Naturalization Service, v. United States ex rel. Carson or Carasaniti, Rabang v. Boyd, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Jackson v. Taylor, Acting Warden, Fowler v. Wilkinson, Warden, Smith v. United States, Lelles v. United States, Markham et al. v. Burchfield et al., Lebron v. United States, Cepero v. Pan American World Airways et al., Luciano v. Wilkinson, Warden,

Opinion:
353 U. S. 685;
353 U. S. 427;
353 U. S.569;
353 U. S. 583;
353 U. S. 983;
353 U. S. 974;
353 U. S. 988;
ante, p. 911;
ante, p. 927; and
ante, p. 924. Petitions for rehearing denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.