Case Name: Harry Bergoffen and Others, Respondents, v. Julia Hobart, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1932-01
Citations: 235 A.D. 639
Docket Number: 
Parties: Harry Bergoffen and Others, Respondents, v. Julia Hobart, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 235
Pages: 639–639

Head Matter:
Harry Bergoffen and Others, Respondents, v. Julia Hobart, Appellant.

Opinion:
Order, as resettled, denying defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on authority of N. E. D. Holding Co. v. McKinley (246 N. Y. 40). Lazansky, P. J., Young and Carswell, JJ., concur; Kapper and Hagarty, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the order on the ground that the contract is too indefinite and uncertain as a basis for an action for specific performance.