Case Name: Adrian D. MURRAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mary POLLARD; Danielle M. Carman; Toni Banks; Theodore S. Royster, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-06-23
Citations: 576 F. App'x 209
Docket Number: No. 14-6201
Parties: Adrian D. MURRAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mary POLLARD; Danielle M. Carman; Toni Banks; Theodore S. Royster, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 576
Pages: 209–209

Head Matter:
Adrian D. MURRAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mary POLLARD; Danielle M. Carman; Toni Banks; Theodore S. Royster, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 14-6201.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 19, 2014.
Decided: June 23, 2014.
Adrian D. Murray, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Adrian D. Murray appeals the district court's order dismissing after a 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (2012) review his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint, and its order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P.- 59(e) motion for reconsideration and motion to amend the complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's orders. Murray v. Pollard, No. 1:13-cv-00314-FDW, 2014 WL 49963 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 7, 2014; Jan. 24, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.