Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Curtis Antonio REESE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-02-25
Citations: 367 F. App'x 475
Docket Number: No. 09-8003
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Curtis Antonio REESE, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 367
Pages: 475–475

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Curtis Antonio REESE, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 09-8003.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 18, 2009.
Decided: Feb. 25, 2010.
Curtis Antonio Reese, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Barrett Taylor, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Curtis Antonio Reese appeals the district court's order denying Reese's 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Reese, No. 3:03-cr-00729-CMC-1 (D.S.C. Oct. 6, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.