Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. LACY RENEE GIRARD, aka Lacy Girard, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2017-04-19
Citations: 284 Or. App. 885
Docket Number: 14CR30129, 15CR00632, 15CR04469; A161117 (Control), A161118, A161120
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. LACY RENEE GIRARD, aka Lacy Girard, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Lagesen, Judge, and Wollheim, Senior Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 284
Pages: 885–886

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted February 28,
affirmed April 19, 2017
STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. LACY RENEE GIRARD, aka Lacy Girard, Defendant-Appellant.
Douglas County Circuit Court
14CR30129, 15CR00632, 15CR04469; A161117 (Control), A161118, A161120
392 P3d 831
George W. Kelly argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.
Nathan Riemersma, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Shannon T. Reel, Assistant Attorney General.
Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Lagesen, Judge, and Wollheim, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
This is a companion case to State v. Girard (A161121), 284 Or App 845, 395 P3d 645 (2017), decided today. In that case, we sustained defendant's conviction for second-degree escape. This appeal concerns the trial court's revocation of defendant's probation based on defendant's conviction in the companion case. On appeal, defendant's sole argument is that, in view of the trial court's reason for revoking probation, we would be required to reverse in this case if we were to set aside defendant's conviction for second-degree escape in the companion case. But, as noted, we have sustained the conviction in the companion case. As a result, defendant's sole argument for reversal in this case necessarily fails.
Affirmed.
The conviction was based on two counts that merged. Although we concluded that defendant was entitled to entry of judgment of acquittal as to one of the two merged counts, we concluded that the trial court properly found defendant guilty on the other count. We therefore remanded for entry of a judgment reflecting a conviction on Count 2. Girard, 284 Or App at 851.