Case Name: Marcel J. Thibert, Respondent, v. Erie Crump, Defendant, and Lawrence Powers et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1957-07-23
Citations: 4 A.D.2d 801
Docket Number: 
Parties: Marcel J. Thibert, Respondent, v. Erie Crump, Defendant, and Lawrence Powers et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 4
Pages: 801–801

Head Matter:
Marcel J. Thibert, Respondent, v. Erie Crump, Defendant, and Lawrence Powers et al., Appellants.

Opinion:
Appeal by the defendants Powers from a judgment of the Supreme Court, St. Lawrence County, entered upon a verdict of a jury. The plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile owned and operated by the defendant Crump, proceeding in a westerly direction along New York State Route No. 37, on December 22, 1954. The defendant Lawrence Powers was operating a ear owned by his wife, the defendant Yvonne Powers, in an easterly direction. The road was straight but not level. As Crump's car came over a small rise of knoll, it started to skid on an icy patch in the roadway. The ear slid sideways down the grade to the left into the path of the defendant Powers' car. There was evidence from which the jury could have found that there was a distance of about 500 feet between the two ears when the Crump car started to skid. The defendant Powers failed to stop his car in time to avoid a collision and a collision occurred on his side of the road. The jury returned a verdict in the amount of $28,000 against the drivers and owners of both ears. The defendant Crump paid $10,000 in partial satisfaction of the judgment and did not appeal. Upon this appeal, the defendants Powers contend that the verdict of the jury holding them liable was against the weight of the evidence and that the amount of the verdict was excessive. We cannot say that the verdict of the jury on the issue of liability was against the weight of the evidence, assuming, as we must, that the jury accepted the version of the accident most favorable to the plaintiff. Neither does the amount of the verdict seem to us to be excessive in view of the serious injuries suffered by the plaintiff. The plaintiff suffered a double fracture of the pubic bone and a fracture of the sacrum. The pelvis was left deformed and there was a permanent curvature of the spine due to the tilting of the pelvis. Judgment and order appealed from affirmed, with costs. Poster, P. J., Bergan, Halpern and Gibson, JJ., concur.