Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio HUGHS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-06-03
Citations: 381 F. App'x 264
Docket Number: No. 09-8192
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Antonio HUGHS, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 381
Pages: 264–264

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Antonio HUGHS, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 09-8192.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 18, 2010.
Decided: June 3, 2010.
Antonio Hughs, Appellant Pro Se. Maxwell B. Cauthen, III, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Antonio Hughs appeals the district court's order denying his motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hughs, No. 6:03-cr-00703-GRA-12 (D.S.C. Nov. 20, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.