Case Name: WEINBERG, WHEELER, HUDGINS, GUNN & DIAL, LLC, Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellee, v. TELEDYNE TECHNOLOGIES INC., Continental Motors, Inc., Defendants-Counter Claimants-Appellants, Technify Motor (USA) Inc., et al., Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-06-11
Citations: 606 F. App'x 567
Docket Number: No. 14-12985
Parties: WEINBERG, WHEELER, HUDGINS, GUNN & DIAL, LLC, Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellee, v. TELEDYNE TECHNOLOGIES INC., Continental Motors, Inc., Defendants-Counter Claimants-Appellants, Technify Motor (USA) Inc., et al., Defendants.
Judges: Before TJOFLAT, ANDERSON and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 606
Pages: 567–568

Head Matter:
WEINBERG, WHEELER, HUDGINS, GUNN & DIAL, LLC, Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellee, v. TELEDYNE TECHNOLOGIES INC., Continental Motors, Inc., Defendants-Counter Claimants-Appellants, Technify Motor (USA) Inc., et al., Defendants.
No. 14-12985.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
June 11, 2015.
Jackson Anthony Dial, Weinberg Wheeler Hudgins Gunn & Dial, LLC, Henry Lane Young, II, Hawkins Parnell Thack-ston & Young, LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Donald Ross Andersen, David Charles Hricik, Taylor English Duma, LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before TJOFLAT, ANDERSON and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.
Honorable David Bryan Sentelle, United States Circuit Judge for the District of Columbia Circuit, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Following our careful review of the record and the parties' briefs, and with the benefit of oral argument, we affirm the judgment of the District Court for the reasons set out in its September 9, 2013, and June 27, 2014, orders. See Doc. 133; Doc. 150.
AFFIRMED.