Case Name: MARK HEINONEN v. JAMES M. MANDRACCHIA ET AL.
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 2010-05-04
Citations: 120 Conn. App. 836
Docket Number: AC 30858
Parties: MARK HEINONEN v. JAMES M. MANDRACCHIA ET AL.
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Appellate Reports
Volume: 120
Pages: 836–837

Head Matter:
MARK HEINONEN v. JAMES M. MANDRACCHIA ET AL.
(AC 30858)
Flynn, C. J., and Graendel and West, Js.
Argued February 17
officially released May 4, 2010
Mark Heinonen, pro se, the appellant (plaintiff).
J. Kevin Golger, for the appellees (defendants).
The listing of judges reflects their seniority status on this court as of the date of oral argument.

Opinion:
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
In this negligence action, the plaintiff, Mark Heinonen, appeals from the judgment, rendered after a jury trial, in favor of the defendants, James M. Mandracchia and Cheryl Mandracchia. After a thorough review of the record, transcripts, briefs and oral argument, and affording those claims that properly are before this court careful consideration, we conclude that the plaintiffs claims are without merit.
The judgment is affirmed.