Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John Irizarry, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1998-05-11
Citations: 250 A.D.2d 705
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Irizarry, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 250
Pages: 705–706

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Irizarry, Appellant.
[672 NYS2d 764]

Opinion:
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pincus, J.), rendered December 11, 1996, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the jury, which saw and heard the witnesses (see, People v Gaimari, 176 NY 84, 94). The jury's determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record (see, People v Garafalo, 44 AD2d 86, 88). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).
The defendant's sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit. Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Joy and Krausman, JJ., concur.