Case Name: Henry Esau MONTERROSO-ROSEL, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-12-21
Citations: 214 F. App'x 696
Docket Number: No. 06-70619
Parties: Henry Esau MONTERROSO-ROSEL, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: GOODWIN, McKEOWN and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 214
Pages: 696–697

Head Matter:
Henry Esau MONTERROSO-ROSEL, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 06-70619.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 18, 2006.
Filed Dec. 21, 2006.
District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, OIL, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: GOODWIN, McKEOWN and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' January 11, 2006 decision, denying petitioner's motion to reopen.
Respondent's motion to dismiss this petition for lack of jurisdiction is denied. See Ray v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 582, 583 (9th Cir.2006)
Respondent's motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.43(h)(1) (stating that jurisdiction over motions to reopen under section 203 of NACARA lies in the immigration court).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.