Case Name: Craig Bryce BATEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1972-03-20
Citations: 455 F.2d 513
Docket Number: No. 26606
Parties: Craig Bryce BATEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 455
Pages: 513–514

Head Matter:
Craig Bryce BATEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 26606.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
March 20, 1972.
William D. Browning, of Estes, Browning & Zlaket, Tucson, Ariz., for plaintiff-appellant.
Richard K. Burke, U. S. Atty., James E. Mueller, Asst. U. S. Atty., Tucson, Ariz., for defendant-appellee.
Before DUNIWAY and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and FERGUSON, District Judge.
Honorable Warren J. Ferguson, United States District Judge, Central District of California, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
After the judgment in this case was entered, Castro v. United States, 1971, 403 U.S. 903, 91 S.Ct. 2215, 29 L.Ed.2d 678; Weber v. United States, 1971, 402 U.S. 939, 91 S.Ct. 1633, 29 L.Ed.2d 107 were decided. On remand in those cases, we vacated the judgments and remanded with instructions to set aside the pleas of guilty. We do the same here.
The judgment is vacated and the cause is remanded to the District Court with instructions to set aside the plea of guilty and, thereafter, to conduct such further proceedings as may be proper.