Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerry Paul JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-03-10
Citations: 269 F. App'x 664
Docket Number: No. 07-30025
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerry Paul JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 269
Pages: 664–665

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerry Paul JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-30025.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 26, 2008 .
Filed March 10, 2008.
Helen J. Brunner, Esq., Carl A. Colasurdo, Esq., USSE — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Carol A. Roller, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Seattle, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: BEEZER, FERNANDEZ, and McREOWN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Jerry Paul Johnson appeals from the 92-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Johnson contends that the district court plainly erred by treating two of his prior offenses as unrelated for purposes of calculating his criminal history. Because Johnson's offenses were separated by his January 14, 1992, intervening arrest, the district court properly treated his offenses as unrelated. See United States v. Gallegos-Gonzalez, 3 F.3d 325, 328 (9th Cir. 1993).
The government's motion for judicial notice and to supplement the record on appeal is denied.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.