Case Name: VINCENT E. RODRIGUES, JR. AND ADALINE RODRIGUES v. STATE OF HAWAII
Court: Supreme Court of the State of Hawaii
Jurisdiction: Hawaii
Decision Date: 1970-09-03
Citations: 52 Haw. 283
Docket Number: No. 4833
Parties: VINCENT E. RODRIGUES, JR. AND ADALINE RODRIGUES v. STATE OF HAWAII.
Judges: Richardson, C.J.,Abe, Levinson, JJ., Hawkins, Circuit Judge, in Place of Marumoto, J., Disqualified, and Laureta, Circuit Judge, in Place of Kobayashi, J., Disqualified.
Reporter: Hawaii Reports
Volume: 52
Pages: 283–284

Head Matter:
VINCENT E. RODRIGUES, JR. AND ADALINE RODRIGUES v. STATE OF HAWAII.
No. 4833.
September 3, 1970.
Richardson, C.J.,Abe, Levinson, JJ., Hawkins, Circuit Judge, in Place of Marumoto, J., Disqualified, and Laureta, Circuit Judge, in Place of Kobayashi, J., Disqualified.

Opinion:
Per Guriam.
Movants (Plaintiffs-Appellees), ask this court to grant a rehearing for the sole purpose of permitting them to request this court to broaden its mandate to allow the court below, on remand, to consider an issue that was never ruled upon by the lower court and that was never heretofore raised in this appeal. Under Rule 3(b) (3), Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawaii, this issue is not properly before this court, either on the appeal or on a petition for rehearing. State v. Kahua Ranch, 47 Haw. 466 (1964). Our ruling in Levy v. Kimball, 51 Haw. 540 (1970), urged in the motion, does not relieve movants from their failure to raise the issue.
Frank D. Padgett (Padgett, Greeley, Marumoto <& Akinaka of counsel) for the petition.
Motion denied.