Case Name: Jo Ann JOST, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Frank J. JOST, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1990-08-07
Citations: 796 S.W.2d 31
Docket Number: No. 56985
Parties: Jo Ann JOST, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Frank J. JOST, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 796
Pages: 31–31

Head Matter:
Jo Ann JOST, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Frank J. JOST, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 56985.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Aug. 7, 1990.
Joseph Howlett, Charles M. Shaw, Shaw, Howlett & Schwarz, Clayton, for defendant-appellant.
Ronald L. Rothman, Clayton, for plaintiff-respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The husband appeals from the trial court's denial of his motion to modify a separation agreement. We affirm.
An extended opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).