Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher Brit BEEBE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-02-07
Citations: 675 F. App'x 378
Docket Number: No. 15-4770
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher Brit BEEBE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 675
Pages: 378–379

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher Brit BEEBE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-4770
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: January 31, 2017
Decided: February 7, 2017
Nicole Nicolette Mace, The Mace Firm, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, for Appellant. William N. Nettles, United States Attorney, Robert F. Daley, Jr., William E. Day, II, Assistánt United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appel-lee.
Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Brit Beebe seeks to appeal his conviction and 97-month sentence for conspiracy to distribute controlled substances, 21 U.S.C. § 846, 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(E) (2012), and possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime, 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)(i) (2012). In its brief, the Government argues that the appeal should be dismissed as barred by Beebe's waiver of the right to appeal included in the plea agreement. Upon review of the plea agreement and the transcript of the Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 hearing, we conclude that Beebe knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal and that the issues Beebe seeks to raise on appeal fall squarely within the compass of his waiver of appellate rights. We reject Beebe's assertion that the Government breached the plea agreement. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED