Case Name: STATE ex rel. James W. KUEHL, Appellant, v. CITY OF JENNINGS and Board of Trustees of the Police and Firemen's Retirement Fund of the City of Jennings, Missouri, Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1994-10-11
Citations: 884 S.W.2d 436
Docket Number: No. 66131
Parties: STATE ex rel. James W. KUEHL, Appellant, v. CITY OF JENNINGS and Board of Trustees of the Police and Firemen’s Retirement Fund of the City of Jennings, Missouri, Respondents.
Judges: Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 884
Pages: 436–436

Head Matter:
STATE ex rel. James W. KUEHL, Appellant, v. CITY OF JENNINGS and Board of Trustees of the Police and Firemen’s Retirement Fund of the City of Jennings, Missouri, Respondents.
No. 66131.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Oct. 11, 1994.
Brent J. Jaimes, Clayton, for appellant.
Lloyd E. Eaker, Clayton, for respondent.
Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
James W. Kuehl ("Claimant") appeals from the circuit court's denial of his claim for disability retirement benefits. Claimant contends on appeal that the circuit court erred in finding he was not permanently and totally disabled as required by the applicable ordinance of the City of Jennings, Missouri. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, along with the legal file, and find the circuit court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prec-edential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).