Case Name: Ana M. UVIEDO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STEVES SASH AND DOOR COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1985-05-13
Citations: 760 F.2d 87
Docket Number: No. 83-1415
Parties: Ana M. UVIEDO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STEVES SASH AND DOOR COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 760
Pages: 87–89

Head Matter:
Ana M. UVIEDO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STEVES SASH AND DOOR COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 83-1415.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
May 13, 1985.
George P. Parker, Theo. F. Weiss, San Antonio, Tex., for defendant-appellant.
Les Mendelsohn, Barry H. Beer, San Antonio, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.
Susan Buckingham Reilly, Atty., E.E. O.C., Washington, D.C., for amicus E.E. O.C.
ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion 2/1/85, 5 Cir., 1985, 753 F.2d 369).
Before THORNBERRY, WILLIAMS and GARWOOD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Treating the suggestion for rehearing en banc as a petition for panel rehearing, the petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. The judges in regular active service of this Court having been polled at the request of one of said judges and a majority of said judges not having voted in favor of it (Fed eral Rules of Appellate Procedure and Local Rule 35), the suggestion for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, TATE, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GAR-WOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and HILL, Circuit Judges.