Case Name: H.G.K.W. CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. TOWNSHIP OF EAST BRUNSWICK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1987-03-31
Citations: 9 N.J. Tax 91
Docket Number: 
Parties: H.G.K.W. CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. TOWNSHIP OF EAST BRUNSWICK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Tax Court Reports
Volume: 9
Pages: 91–91

Head Matter:
H.G.K.W. CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. TOWNSHIP OF EAST BRUNSWICK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued March 17, 1987
Decided March 31, 1987.
Before Judges GAULKIN, BAIME and ASHBEY.
Harold A. Kuskin argued the cause for appellant {Lasser, Hochman, Marcus, Guryan & Kuskin, attorneys).
William T. Yadlon argued the cause for respondent (Busch & Busch, attorneys).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The July 1, 1986 judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Andrew's July 16, 1986 opinion reported at 8 N.J.Tax 454 (Tax Ct.1986).