Case Name: WINEGARD COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ELECTRONIC CONTROLLED SYSTEMS, INC. (doing business as King Controls), Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-11-16
Citations: 484 F. App'x 570
Docket Number: No. 2012-1282
Parties: WINEGARD COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ELECTRONIC CONTROLLED SYSTEMS, INC. (doing business as King Controls), Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: DYK, PLAGER, and REYNA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 484
Pages: 570–571

Head Matter:
WINEGARD COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ELECTRONIC CONTROLLED SYSTEMS, INC. (doing business as King Controls), Defendant-Appellant.
No. 2012-1282.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Nov. 16, 2012.
Robert V.P. Waterman, Jr., Lane & Waterman LLP, of Davenport, IA, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief was April A. Marshall.
Randall T. Skaar, Skaar Ulbrich Macari, P.A., of Minnetonka, MN, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief was Scott G. Ulbrich.
DYK, PLAGER, and REYNA, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.