Case Name: Edward G. MUMPOWER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gordon R. ENGLAND, Secretary of the Navy, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-09-08
Citations: 292 F. App'x 567
Docket Number: No. 07-55037
Parties: Edward G. MUMPOWER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gordon R. ENGLAND, Secretary of the Navy, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 292
Pages: 567–568

Head Matter:
Edward G. MUMPOWER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gordon R. ENGLAND, Secretary of the Navy, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 07-55037.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 26, 2008.
Filed Sept. 8, 2008.
Maury Mills, Jr., Esq., Ventura, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Debra W. Yang, Esq., USLA-Office of the U.S. Attorney Civil & Tax Divisions, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before: SCHROEDER, KLEINFELD, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument and therefore denies appellant's request. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Edward G. Mumpower appeals from the district court's order dismissing his employment discrimination action for failure to serve the summons and complaint in a timely manner. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. Townsel v. County of Contra Costa, 820 F.2d 319, 320 (9th Cir. 1987). We affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion in the context of this case in dismissing Mumpower's action without prejudice because the circumstances did not compel the conclusion that his attorney's admitted failure to review the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure excused his failure to effect timely service. See id. (holding that counsel's ignorance of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure does not constitute good cause).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.