Case Name: Jamaha ROBINSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. State of LOUISIANA, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-07-01
Citations: 791 F.3d 614
Docket Number: No. 13-30016
Parties: Jamaha ROBINSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. State of LOUISIANA, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before PRADO, ELROD, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 791
Pages: 614–616

Head Matter:
Jamaha ROBINSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. State of LOUISIANA, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 13-30016.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
July 1, 2015.
Kyle D. Schonekas, Ian Lewis Atkinson, Esq., Attorney, William P. Gibbens, Esq., Schonekas, Evans, McGoey & McEachin, L.L.C., New Orleans, LA, for Petitioner-Appellant.
Ellen Daigle Doskey, Esq., District Attorney’s Office for the 32nd JDC — Parish of Terrebonne, Houma, LA, for Respon-denb-Appellee.
Before PRADO, ELROD, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ON THE COURT'S OWN MOTION
EDWARD C. PRADO, Circuit Judge:
The Court having been polled at the request of one of its members, and a majority of the judges who are in regular active service and not disqualified not having voted in favor (Fed. R.App. P. 35 and 5th Cir. R. 35), rehearing en banc is DENIED. In the en banc poll, seven judges voted in favor of rehearing (Judges Jolly, Jones, Smith, Clement, Owen, Elrod, and Southwiek) and eight judges voted against rehearing (Chief Judge Stewart and Judges Davis, Dennis, Prado, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, and Costa).
Rehearing en banc is DENIED. Judge Smith, joined by Judges Jones, Clement, and Elrod, dissents from the Court's denial of rehearing en banc, and his dissent is attached.