Case Name: Tibbals v. Daby
Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1880-12-06
Citations: 11 F. 903
Docket Number: 
Parties: Tibbals v. Daby.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter
Volume: 11
Pages: 903–903

Head Matter:
Tibbals v. Daby.
(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.
December 6, 1880.)
Patents — Inpbingement—Deceee.
Where one claim of a patent was infri nged and the others were not, the usual decree will be entered.
A. v. Briesen, for plaintiff.
G. H. Yeoman, for defendant.

Opinion:
Blatchford, C. J.
I am of opinion that it is shown that the defendant has infringed claim 1 of patent No. 79,534, and that nothing is proved sufficient to show that said claim is invalid. I am also of opinion that the defendant's arrangement does not infringe claim 4, or 5, or 6 of patent No. 101,295, or any other claim of that patent. The usual decree will be entered for the plaintiff on claim 1 of patent No. 79,534, with costs.