Case Name: Angela P. BOONE, Respondent, v. PITTSBURGH PIPE & SUPPLY CORPORATION, Appellant, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2017-08-22
Citations: 525 S.W.3d 214
Docket Number: No. ED 105325
Parties: Angela P. BOONE, Respondent, v. PITTSBURGH PIPE & SUPPLY CORPORATION, Appellant, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent.
Judges: Before Colleen Dolan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 525
Pages: 214–215

Head Matter:
Angela P. BOONE, Respondent, v. PITTSBURGH PIPE & SUPPLY CORPORATION, Appellant, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent.
No. ED 105325
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
FILED: August 22, 2017
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: Charles S. Kramer, Paul Adams Grote, Co-Counsel, 7700 Bonhomme Ave., 7th Floor, St. Louis, MO 63105, RIEZMAN & BERGER, P.C.
ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT: Ryan Scott Shaughnessy, 1140 Boulder Creek Parkway, Suite 202, O’Fallon, IL 62269, SHAUGHNESSY LAW FIRM, P.C.
Before Colleen Dolan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Pittsburgh Pipe & Supply Corporation ("Employer") appeals from the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission ("Commission"), which found that Angela Boone was not disqualified from unemployment benefits after her termination from Employer because of misconduct connected with work. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The evidence in support of the Commission's order was not insufficient. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Commission's order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).