Case Name: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1996-11-13
Citations: 77 Ohio St. 3d 91
Docket Number: No. 96-1431
Parties: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Stratton, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 77
Pages: 91–92

Head Matter:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown (1996), 77 Ohio St.3d 91.]
(No. 96-1431
Submitted September 10, 1996
Decided November 13, 1996.)
Geoffrey Stem, Disciplinary Counsel, and Stacy M. Solochek, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.
Sherburne C. Brown, pro se.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. The record indicates that respondent requires rehabilitation. This court's duty to the public requires that respondent affirmatively demonstrate his rehabilitation before we allow him to resume his place on the rolls of those permitted to practice law in Ohio. We have thus far suspended respondent from the practice of law for an interim period. We now hereby suspend respondent from the practice of law for an indefinite period. Costs taxed to the respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Stratton, JJ., concur.