Case Name: Samuel HALL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1984-08-14
Citations: 453 So. 2d 932
Docket Number: No. 83-556
Parties: Samuel HALL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARK-DULL and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 453
Pages: 932–933

Head Matter:
Samuel HALL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 83-556.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Aug. 14, 1984.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Sharon B. Jacobs, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Renee E. Rus-ka, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARK-DULL and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellant's convictions of robbery and aggravated assault are affirmed. Rose v. State, 425 So.2d 521 (Fla.1983); Welty v. State, 402 So.2d 1159 (Fla.1981); Spinkellink v. State, 313 So.2d 666 (Fla. 1975); Machado v. State, 363 So.2d 1132 (Fla.3d DCA 1978). However, the minimum-mandatory three-year sentences, pursuant to the provisions of Section 775.-087(2) Florida Statutes (1981), should have been ordered to be served concurrently. Palmer v. State, 438 So.2d 1 (Fla.1983); Parson v. State, 450 So.2d 924 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Whitehead v. State, 446 So.2d 194 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).
Therefore the convictions are affirmed and the sentences are affirmed except as modified by this opinion to make the minimum-mandatory three-year sentences run concurrently rather than consecutively.
Affirmed as modified.