Case Name: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Samuel Anthony MONARCH, Petitioner
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2018-01-11
Citations: 179 A.3d 3
Docket Number: No. 268 WAL 2017
Parties: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent
v.
Samuel Anthony MONARCH, Petitioner
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 179
Pages: 3–3

Head Matter:
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent
v.
Samuel Anthony MONARCH, Petitioner
No. 268 WAL 2017
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
January 11, 2018
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 11th day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Was [petitioner] given impermissible enhanced penalties, as expressed in Birchfield v. North Dakota, _ U.S. _, 136 S.Ct. 2160, 195 L.Ed.2d 560 (June 23, 2016), for his refusal to consent to chemical testing?