Case Name: Martin CARABELLA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1999-02-03
Citations: 727 So. 2d 270
Docket Number: No. 98-0427
Parties: Martin CARABELLA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: DELL, KLEIN and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 727
Pages: 270–271

Head Matter:
Martin CARABELLA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 98-0427
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb. 3, 1999.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Eric Gottlieb, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Maya Saxena, Assistant Attorney General, Fort Lauderdale, for appel-lee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant argues that the trial court erroneously excluded certain testimony upon the state's hearsay objection. By not raising in the trial court those arguments for admissibility now raised on appeal, appellant failed to preserve his contention that the excluded statements were non-hearsay or that they fell within some exception to the hearsay rule. See Tillman v. State, 471 So.2d 32, 35 (Fla.1985); Guittierez v. State, 704 So.2d 161 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (Gross, J., concurring).
DELL, KLEIN and GROSS, JJ., concur.