Case Name: Deirdre C. GLASCOE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles J. MARTOFF; Kate J. Francis, Defendants-Appellees, and Monifa N. Bailey; Jane Doe # 1; Jane Doe # 2, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-11-17
Citations: 453 F. App'x 374
Docket Number: No. 11-1629
Parties: Deirdre C. GLASCOE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles J. MARTOFF; Kate J. Francis, Defendants-Appellees, and Monifa N. Bailey; Jane Doe # 1; Jane Doe # 2, Defendants.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 453
Pages: 374–375

Head Matter:
Deirdre C. GLASCOE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles J. MARTOFF; Kate J. Francis, Defendants-Appellees, and Monifa N. Bailey; Jane Doe # 1; Jane Doe # 2, Defendants.
No. 11-1629.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 15, 2011.
Decided: Nov. 17, 2011.
Deirdre C. Glascoe, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Douglas Lane, Thompson McMul-lan PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Deirdre C. Glascoe appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to Appellees, denying Glascoe's motion for judgment as a matter of law, and ruling on other pending motions. She also appeals the court's denial of her post-judgment motion for new trial. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm both orders for the reasons stated by the district court. Glascoe v. Martoff, No. 1:09-cv-00708-GBL-TCB (E.D.Va., Apr. 20, May 19, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.