Case Name: Charles M. WEDEKIND, Appellant, v. Karen M. WEDEKIND, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-12-26
Citations: 209 S.W.3d 522
Docket Number: No. ED 87073
Parties: Charles M. WEDEKIND, Appellant, v. Karen M. WEDEKIND, Respondent.
Judges: Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 209
Pages: 522–522

Head Matter:
Charles M. WEDEKIND, Appellant, v. Karen M. WEDEKIND, Respondent.
No. ED 87073.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District.
Dec. 26, 2006.
Kevin Wibbenmeyer, Saint Charles, MO, for appellant.
Benicia Baker-Livorsi, Saint Charles, MO, for respondent.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Charles M. Wedekind ("Father") appeals the judgment denying his motions to modify and for contempt and granting Karen M. Wedekind's ("Mother") motion to modify. We find no error in the Commissioner's alleged bias or lack of impartiality. We also find that the denial of Father's motion to modify was supported by substantial evidence, was not against the weight of the evidence, and did not erroneously declare or apply the law.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).