Case Name: James Elliott PRICE, Sr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ernest R. SUTTON, Administrator, d/b/a Wayne Ingram, Acting Superintendent, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-09-26
Citations: 19 F. App'x 130
Docket Number: No. 01-6761
Parties: James Elliott PRICE, Sr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ernest R. SUTTON, Administrator, d/b/a Wayne Ingram, Acting Superintendent, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before LUTTIG, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 19
Pages: 130–130

Head Matter:
James Elliott PRICE, Sr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ernest R. SUTTON, Administrator, d/b/a Wayne Ingram, Acting Superintendent, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 01-6761.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 20, 2001.
Decided Sept. 26, 2001.
James Elliott Price, Sr., pro se. Thomas Drummond Bagwell, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for appellee.
Before LUTTIG, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
James Elliott Price, Sr., appeals the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Price v. Sutton, No. CA-00-631-3 (E.D.Va. Mar. 21, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.