Case Name: James Junior PATILLO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James HANNAH, Officer; Richmond Police Department, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-05-08
Citations: 34 F. App'x 114
Docket Number: No. 02-6449
Parties: James Junior PATILLO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James HANNAH, Officer; Richmond Police Department, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 34
Pages: 114–115

Head Matter:
James Junior PATILLO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James HANNAH, Officer; Richmond Police Department, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 02-6449.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 25, 2002.
Decided May 8, 2002.
James Junior Patillo, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
James Junior Patillo, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Patillo v. Hannah, No. CA-02-114-2 (E.D.Va. Mar. 4, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.