Case Name: IN the INTEREST OF: E.H., A Minor
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2015-03-10
Citations: 457 S.W.3d 382
Docket Number: No. ED 101740
Parties: IN the INTEREST OF: E.H., A Minor.
Judges: Before Lawrence E. Mooney, P.J., Clifford H. Ahrens, J. and Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 457
Pages: 382–383

Head Matter:
IN the INTEREST OF: E.H., A Minor.
No. ED 101740
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Filed: March 10, 2015
Stephen J. Bardol, 34 North Gore Avenue, Suite 203, St. Louis, Missouri 63119, David Redmond Crosby (Guardian Ad Li-tem), 225 Main Street, P.O. Box 79, Hills-boro, Missouri 63050, for Appellant.'
Amanda Sodomka, Theodore Allen, Jr. (co-counsel), P.O. Box 100, Hillsboro, Missouri 63050, for Respondent.
Before Lawrence E. Mooney, P.J., Clifford H. Ahrens, J. and Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
T.A.D. appeals the juvenile court's judgment terminating her parental rights to minor child E.H., upon the petition filed by the Juvenile Officer of Jefferson County.
We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and re stating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).