Case Name: In the Matter of The Foreclosure of Tax Liens Pursuant to Article VII-A, Title 3, of the Tax Law by City of New Rochelle with Respect to Serial Nos. 203, 206, 226, 232, 233, 624, 680, 748, 883, Respectively. City of New Rochelle, Respondent, v. Alice Seacord, as Sole Surviving Executrix of and Trustee under the Last Will and Testament of Charles G. Banks, Deceased, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1942-06-08
Citations: 264 A.D. 867
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of The Foreclosure of Tax Liens Pursuant to Article VII-A, Title 3, of the Tax Law by City of New Rochelle with Respect to Serial Nos. 203, 206, 226, 232, 233, 624, 680, 748, 883, Respectively. City of New Rochelle, Respondent, v. Alice Seacord, as Sole Surviving Executrix of and Trustee under the Last Will and Testament of Charles G. Banks, Deceased, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 264
Pages: 867–867

Head Matter:
In the Matter of The Foreclosure of Tax Liens Pursuant to Article VII-A, Title 3, of the Tax Law by City of New Rochelle with Respect to Serial Nos. 203, 206, 226, 232, 233, 624, 680, 748, 883, Respectively. City of New Rochelle, Respondent, v. Alice Seacord, as Sole Surviving Executrix of and Trustee under the Last Will and Testament of Charles G. Banks, Deceased, Appellant.

Opinion:
Order of the County Court of Westchester County dated March 25, 1942, as amended by order dated April 14, 1942, striking out the defense contained in paragraph " second " of defendant's answer as insufficient in law, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (City of Utica v. Proite, 288 N. Y. 477.) Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.