Case Name: Arthur Herman, Appellant, v. Thomas Horgan, as Property Clerk of the Police Department of the City of New York, and "John Doe," Name "John Doe" Being Fictitious, Party Intended Being the Person in Possession of the Property Sought to Be Replevied, Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1932-02
Citations: 235 A.D. 696
Docket Number: 
Parties: Arthur Herman, Appellant, v. Thomas Horgan, as Property Clerk of the Police Department of the City of New York, and “John Doe,” Name “John Doe” Being Fictitious, Party Intended Being the Person in Possession of the Property Sought to Be Replevied, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 235
Pages: 696–696

Head Matter:
Arthur Herman, Appellant, v. Thomas Horgan, as Property Clerk of the Police Department of the City of New York, and “John Doe,” Name “John Doe” Being Fictitious, Party Intended Being the Person in Possession of the Property Sought to Be Replevied, Respondents.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Seudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Young, J., dissent on authority of People v. Jennings (257 N. Y. 196).