Case Name: Maurice Bernard STEWART, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer FLANARY; Officer Logsden, Defendants-Appellees, and Norman A. Brown, M.D.; Elizabeth, R.N., Defendants, and Office of the Attorney General, Party-in-Interest
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-02-24
Citations: 595 F. App'x 233
Docket Number: No. 14-7164
Parties: Maurice Bernard STEWART, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer FLANARY; Officer Logsden, Defendants-Appellees, and Norman A. Brown, M.D.; Elizabeth, R.N., Defendants, and Office of the Attorney General, Party-in-Interest.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 595
Pages: 233–234

Head Matter:
Maurice Bernard STEWART, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer FLANARY; Officer Logsden, Defendants-Appellees, and Norman A. Brown, M.D.; Elizabeth, R.N., Defendants, and Office of the Attorney General, Party-in-Interest.
No. 14-7164.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 19, 2015.
Decided: Feb. 24, 2015.
Maurice Bernard Stewart, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Maurice Bernard Stewart, Jr. appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to the Appellees. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Stewart v. Flanary, No. 1:10-cv-00863-JFM (D.Md. July 25, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.