Case Name: Ada V. Tinsley, Respondent, v. James A. Smith et al., Co-partners under the Firm Name of The Edward P. Hampson Company et al., Defendants, and Genevieve C. Skelly et al., as Executors of Patrick Skelly, Deceased, Appellants
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1909-02-09
Citations: 194 N.Y. 581
Docket Number: 
Parties: Ada V. Tinsley, Respondent, v. James A. Smith et al., Co-partners under the Firm Name of The Edward P. Hampson Company et al., Defendants, and Genevieve C. Skelly et al., as Executors of Patrick Skelly, Deceased, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 194
Pages: 581–581

Head Matter:
Ada V. Tinsley, Respondent, v. James A. Smith et al., Co-partners under the Firm Name of The Edward P. Hampson Company et al., Defendants, and Genevieve C. Skelly et al., as Executors of Patrick Skelly, Deceased, Appellants.
Tinsley v. Smith, 115 App. Div. 708, affirmed.
(Argued January 27, 1909;
decided February 9, 1909.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered December 7, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien.
Martin Paskus for appellants.
Amos H. Stephens for respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Werner,Willard Bartlett, Hiscook and Chase, JJ.