Case Name: James Arthur BIGGINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Leah T. SEATON, Deputy Public Defender; John P. Rue, District Public Defender, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-10-06
Citations: 397 F. App'x 901
Docket Number: No. 10-7040
Parties: James Arthur BIGGINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Leah T. SEATON, Deputy Public Defender; John P. Rue, District Public Defender, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 397
Pages: 901–901

Head Matter:
James Arthur BIGGINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Leah T. SEATON, Deputy Public Defender; John P. Rue, District Public Defender, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 10-7040.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 28, 2010.
Decided: Oct. 6, 2010.
James Arthur Biggins, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James Arthur Biggins appeals the district court's orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006) and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Biggins v. Seaton, No. 8:10-cv-01488-PJM (D. Md. June 11 & July 9, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.