Case Name: Charles MORENO, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1995-11-17
Citations: 70 F.3d 433
Docket Number: Nos. 94-1231, 94-1247
Parties: Charles MORENO, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
Judges: Before MERRITT, Chief Judge; KENNEDY, MARTIN, MILBURN, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, and MOORE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 70
Pages: 433–433

Head Matter:
Charles MORENO, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
Nos. 94-1231, 94-1247.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Nov. 17, 1995.
Before MERRITT, Chief Judge; KENNEDY, MARTIN, MILBURN, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, and MOORE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:
The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.
The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.