Case Name: Francis Pigno, an Infant, by His Guardian ad Litem, Vincent Pigno, Respondent, v. Louis Bunim et al., Defendants, and Israel L. Schmierer, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Estate of Samuel Pennell, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent, et al., Third-Party Defendant; Estate of Bernard K. Sherman, Third-Party Defendant and Second Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent; Maimonides Hospital, Third-Party Defendant and Second Third-Party Defendant-Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1985-10-15
Citations: 114 A.D.2d 405
Docket Number: 
Parties: Francis Pigno, an Infant, by His Guardian ad Litem, Vincent Pigno, Respondent, v Louis Bunim et al., Defendants, and Israel L. Schmierer, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Estate of Samuel Pennell, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent, et al., Third-Party Defendant; Estate of Bernard K. Sherman, Third-Party Defendant and Second Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent; Maimonides Hospital, Third-Party Defendant and Second Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 114
Pages: 405–405

Head Matter:
Francis Pigno, an Infant, by His Guardian ad Litem, Vincent Pigno, Respondent, v Louis Bunim et al., Defendants, and Israel L. Schmierer, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Estate of Samuel Pennell, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent, et al., Third-Party Defendant; Estate of Bernard K. Sherman, Third-Party Defendant and Second Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent; Maimonides Hospital, Third-Party Defendant and Second Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

Opinion:
—Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 2, 1984, affirmed, with one bill of costs to respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs, for the reasons stated by Justice Clemente at Special Term. O'Connor, J. P., Rubin, Fiber and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.