Case Name: EMMA HUNT, Respondent, v. JOSEPHINE BLANCHARD et al., Appellants
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1931-03-16
Citations: 112 Cal. App. 557
Docket Number: Civ. No. 7676
Parties: EMMA HUNT, Respondent, v. JOSEPHINE BLANCHARD et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports
Volume: 112
Pages: 557–558

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 7676.
First Appellate District, Division One.
March 16, 1931.]
EMMA HUNT, Respondent, v. JOSEPHINE BLANCHARD et al., Appellants.
Sidney A. Shoop for Appellants.
Collamer A. Bridge for Respondent.

Opinion:
GRAY, J., pro tem.
This appeal from a judgment quieting title, being based upon the judgment-roll alone, does not permit Consideration of alleged errors in the admission of evidence, of alleged insufficiency of the evidence to sup-, port the findings, or, of the alleged omission to make findings, but confines consideration to the single question as to sufficiency of the findings to support the judgment. (2 Cal. Jur. 690.) Our examination of the judgment-roll satisfies us that the findings are decisive of the issues presented by the pleadings and amply support the judgment.
The judgment is affirmed.
Tyler, P. J., and Cashin, J., concurred.