Case Name: Rainey v. McFarland
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1923-02-09
Citations: 29 Ga. App. 494
Docket Number: 13637
Parties: Rainey v. McFarland.
Judges: Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 29
Pages: 494–494

Head Matter:
13637.
Rainey v. McFarland.
Decided February 9, 1923.
Complaint; from Floyd superior court—Judge Nunnally. April 6, 1922.
Porter & Mebane, for plaintiff in error.
Willingham, Wright & Covington, contra.

Opinion:
Bell, J.
Although the plaintiff in error, who was defendant in the trial court, recites in his bill of exceptions that a verdict adverse to him was by the court directed, the sole assignment of error is upon the overruling of his motion for a new trial, which contained the general grounds only; and, since the evidence did not demand a verdict in his favor, such judgment must be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.