Case Name: Adam De Donato, Doing Business as Adam Roofing & Window Co., Respondent, v. Norma Brill, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1958-05-20
Citations: 13 Misc. 2d 350
Docket Number: 
Parties: Adam De Donato, Doing Business as Adam Roofing & Window Co., Respondent, v. Norma Brill, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 13
Pages: 350–350

Head Matter:
Adam De Donato, Doing Business as Adam Roofing & Window Co., Respondent, v. Norma Brill, Appellant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
May 20, 1958.
Joseph P. Apfel for appellant.
No appearance for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam,
The court's decision was inconsistent.
The judgment should be unanimously reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with $10 costs to the defendant to abide the event.
Concur — Pette, Hart and Brown, JJ.
Judgment reversed, etc.