Case Name: Jose A. ROJAS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1988-03-15
Citations: 523 So. 2d 1179
Docket Number: No. 87-1329
Parties: Jose A. ROJAS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before BASKIN, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 523
Pages: 1179–1180

Head Matter:
Jose A. ROJAS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 87-1329.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 15, 1988.
Rehearing Denied May 18, 1988.
Max P. Engel and Kenneth Speiller, Miami, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Julie S. Thornton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before BASKIN, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Finding no merit in appellant's contention that the evidence was insufficient to establish his participation in a conspiracy, that the trial court erred in admitting audio tapes into evidence, and that error appeared in the admission of evidence of other crimes, we affirm his convictions of attempt to traffic in cannabis and conspiracy to traffic in cannabis. See United States v. Martin, 794 F.2d 1531 (11th Cir.1986); Munroe v. State, 514 So.2d 397 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), review denied, 519 So.2d 987 (Fla.1988); State v. Morales, 460 So.2d 410 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). The state concedes that appellant's attempted trafficking conviction, incorrectly cited as a first degree felony, should be corrected to appear as a second degree felony. We remand for that purpose.
Affirmed as modified.