Case Name: Earl E. FLORAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2005-12-30
Citations: 918 So. 2d 382
Docket Number: No. 2D05-1339
Parties: Earl E. FLORAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: CANADY and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 918
Pages: 382–382

Head Matter:
Earl E. FLORAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D05-1339.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Dec. 30, 2005.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 25, 2006.

Opinion:
ALTENBERND, Judge.
Earl E. Floran appeals an order denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence that was filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm the trial court's ruling concerning Mr. Flo-ran's argument that the trial court did not use the appropriate scoresheet. We reverse the trial court's refusal to consider Mr. Floran's challenge to his sexual predator designation. In light of our recent decision in King v. State, 911 So.2d 229 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005), the trial court must consider challenges to sexual predator status under rule 3.800(a).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
CANADY and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.