Case Name: Israel O. Blake, Appellant, v. George C. Clausen, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1899-03-24
Citations: 158 N.Y. 727
Docket Number: 
Parties: Israel O. Blake, Appellant, v. George C. Clausen, Respondent.
Judges: All concur.
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 158
Pages: 727–727

Head Matter:
Israel O. Blake, Appellant, v. George C. Clausen, Respondent.
(Argued March 16, 1899 ;
decided March 24, 1899.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 24, 1896, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision of the court dismissing the complaint on trial without a jury.
Blake v. Clausen, 10 App. Div. 223, affirmed.
Jonatham C. Boss and Phili/p Carpenter for appellant.
Samuel Untermyer and MosesWeinman for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We think the judgment should be affirmed, with costs. There was no valid renewal of the note in question on the 28th day of October, 1887. (Olmstead v. Latimer, 158 N. Y. 313, and authorities there cited.)
Upon the other questions involved we call attention to, the cases of Chapman v. Lynch (156 N. Y. 551) and Close v. Potter (155 N. Y. 145, 156).
All concur.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.