Case Name: In re: Guetatchew FIKROU, Debtor; Guetatchew FIKROU, Appellant, v. FIRST NATIONWIDE MORTGAGE CORPORATION; et al., Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-04-15
Citations: 32 F. App'x 493
Docket Number: No. 01-15010, NC-00-01547PRYB; BAP Nos. NC-00-01547-PRyB
Parties: In re: Guetatchew FIKROU, Debtor.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 32
Pages: 493–493

Head Matter:
In re: Guetatchew FIKROU, Debtor.
Guetatchew FIKROU, Appellant, v. FIRST NATIONWIDE MORTGAGE CORPORATION; et al., Appellees.
No. 01-15010, NC-00-01547PRYB.
BAP Nos. NC-00-01547-PRyB.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 8, 2002 .
Decided April 15, 2002.
Before BROWNING, KLEINFELD, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, we deny appellant’s request for oral argument.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Guetatchew Fikrou appeals pro se the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's ("BAP") dismissal of his appeal of the bankruptcy court's judgment dismissing his adversary action, which challenged the transfer of his property. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We independently review the BAP decision. See United States v. Battley (In re Kimura), 969 F.2d 806, 810 (9th Cir.1992). We review for clear error the bankruptcy court's findings of fact, and we review de novo its conclusions of law. See id. We affirm for the reasons stated in the bankruptcy court's order filed August 8, 2000.
Fikrou's remaining contentions are without merit.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.