Case Name: JAHN v. FAHEY
Court: Michigan Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Michigan
Decision Date: 1900-04-24
Citations: 123 Mich. 695
Docket Number: 
Parties: JAHN v. FAHEY.
Judges: 
Reporter: Michigan Reports
Volume: 123
Pages: 695–696

Head Matter:
JAHN v. FAHEY.
Appeal — Evidence—Foreclosure of Mortgage — Forged Signature.
A decree of foreclosure, rendered on conflicting evidence as to whether the purported signature of defendant to the mortgage in suit was a forgery, was affirmed.
Appeal from Wayne; Waite, J.
Submitted April 11, 1900.
Decided April 24, 1900.
Bill by Julius Jahn, Jr., against Sarah J. Fahey, to foreclose a mortgage. From a decree for complainant, defendant appeals.
Affirmed.
William E. Walsh, for complainant.
Jonathan Palmer, Jr. (Fred M. Aldrich, of counsel), for defendant.
Rehearing denied June 18, 1900.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This is. a bill to foreclose a mortgage executed by the defendant. The sole defense is that the mortgage and note were forged. The court below entered a decree for the complainant. The testimony was in direct conflict. A discussion of it would be unprofitable. We think the court below reached the correct conclusion.
Decree affirmed, with costs.