Case Name: Metro Goldwyn Mayer Distg. Corp., Appellant, v. Shook
Court: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1933-03-03
Citations: 108 Pa. Super. 391
Docket Number: Appeal No. 119
Parties: Metro Goldwyn Mayer Distg. Corp., Appellant, v. Shook.
Judges: Before Trexler, P. J., Keller, - Gawthrop, Cunningham, Baldrige, Stadtpeld and Parker, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania Superior Court Reports
Volume: 108
Pages: 391–392

Head Matter:
Metro Goldwyn Mayer Distg. Corp., Appellant, v. Shook.
Argued November 22, 1932.
Before Trexler, P. J., Keller, - Gawthrop, Cunningham, Baldrige, Stadtpeld and Parker, JJ.
Frank Fogel, and with him W. M. Rosenfield, for appellant.
David J. Fanning, for appellee.
March 3, 1933:

Opinion:
Opinion by
Parker, J.,
The identical question involved in this appeal was disposed of in the case of R. K. 0. Distributing Corpo ration v. C. A. Shook, in which case an opinion was handed down at this term of court, 108 Pa. Superior Ct. 383. The cases were argued together and presented in one brief.
We are all of the opinion that the judgment entered should be reversed and the record remitted to the lower court for further proceedings, and that an opportunity should be given to the defendant to amend his affidavit of defense.
Judgment of the lower court is reversed with a procedendo.