Case Name: Andrew GRIFFIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2004-12-29
Citations: 912 So. 2d 586
Docket Number: No. 2D04-3633
Parties: Andrew GRIFFIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: DAVIS, KELLY, and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 912
Pages: 586–587

Head Matter:
Andrew GRIFFIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D04-3633.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Dec. 29, 2004.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Boyd v. State, 880 So.2d 726 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). After this court held in Boyd that a claim of vindictive sentencing is not cognizable in a motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), the Fifth District in Johnson v. State, 877 So.2d 795 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004), reversed a circuit court order denying a rule 3.800(a) motion and remanded for consideration of the claim of vindictive sentencing raised in the motion. We certify direct conflict with Johnson.
Affirmed; conflict certified.
DAVIS, KELLY, and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.