Case Name: ANDREW STEBER, RESPONDENT, v. CARMINE F. MALANKA ET AL., APPELLANTS
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1937-01-22
Citations: 117 N.J.L. 444
Docket Number: 
Parties: ANDREW STEBER, RESPONDENT, v. CARMINE F. MALANKA ET AL., APPELLANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 117
Pages: 444–444

Head Matter:
ANDREW STEBER, RESPONDENT, v. CARMINE F. MALANKA ET AL., APPELLANTS.
Submitted October 30, 1936
Decided January 22, 1937.
For the respondent, Feinberg & Feinberg.
For the appellants, Bauer & Ranker.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Lloyd in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.