Case Name: John HOSKINGS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. P.L. VAZQUEZ, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-11-28
Citations: 459 F. App'x 667
Docket Number: No. 08-17735
Parties: John HOSKINGS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. P.L. VAZQUEZ, Warden, Respondent—Appellee.
Judges: Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 459
Pages: 667–668

Head Matter:
John HOSKINGS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. P.L. VAZQUEZ, Warden, Respondent—Appellee.
No. 08-17735.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 21, 2011.
Filed Nov. 28, 2011.
John Hoskings, Wasco, CA, pro se.
Yun Hwa Harper, Deputy Attorney General, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.
Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
California state prisoner John Hoskings appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.
Hoskings contends that the Governor's 2004 decision reversing the Board of Prison Terms's decision finding him suitable for parole is not supported by some evidence. The record reflects that Hoskings received all process that was due. See Swarthout v. Cooke, — U.S.-,- -, 131 S.Ct. 859, 862-63, 178 L.Ed.2d 732 (2011) (per curiam).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.