Case Name: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Oliver FOSTER, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2009-03-05
Citations: 968 A.2d 224
Docket Number: 
Parties: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Oliver FOSTER, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 968
Pages: 224–224

Head Matter:
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Oliver FOSTER, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
March 5, 2009.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 5th day of March 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Did the Superior Court err in determining that [Respondent's] challenge to the application of a mandatory minimum sentence was a non-waivable challenge to the legality of the sentence despite the fact that the sentence did not exceed the statutory maximum sentence for the crime of which he was convicted?