Case Name: PUGACH v. DOLLINGER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BRONX COUNTY, et al.
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1961-02-27
Citations: 365 U.S. 458
Docket Number: No. 111
Parties: PUGACH v. DOLLINGER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BRONX COUNTY, et al.
Judges: Mr. Justice Brennan would also affirm but solely on the authority of Stefanelli v. Minard, 342 U. S. 117.
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 365
Pages: 458–464

Head Matter:
PUGACH v. DOLLINGER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BRONX COUNTY, et al.
No. 111.
Argued January 16, 1961.
Decided February 27, 1961.
George J. Todaro argued the cause and filed a brief, and Frances Kahn filed an appearance, for petitioner.
Walter E. Dillon and Irving Anolik argued the cause for respondents. With them on the brief were Isidore Dollinger, respondent, pro se, and Alexander E. Scheer.
Briefs of amici curiae, urging affirmance, were filed by Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Pax-ton Blair, Solicitor General, and Jean M. Coon, Assistant Attorney General, for the Attorney General of New York, and by Edward S. Silver and Aaron Nussbaum for the District Attorneys' Association of New York.
Emanuel Redfield filed a brief for the New York Civil Liberties Union et al., as amici curiae, urging reversal.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed on the authority of Schwartz v. Texas, 344 U. S. 199, and Stefanelli v. Minard, 342 U. S. 117.
Mr. Justice Brennan would also affirm but solely on the authority of Stefanelli v. Minard, 342 U. S. 117.