Case Name: Ashton R. O'DWYER, Jr., on his own behalf and on behalf of his clients in the "Victims of Katrina" litigation, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Daniel E. BECNEL, Jr.; Calvin C. Fayard, Jr.; D. Blayne Honeycutt; Joseph M. Bruno; Unidentified Parties, all other lawyers who may be admitted to the bar of this court, but who are similarly situated to the named respondents, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-10-03
Citations: 295 F. App'x 645
Docket Number: No. 08-30438
Parties: Ashton R. O’DWYER, Jr., on his own behalf and on behalf of his clients in the “Victims of Katrina” litigation, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Daniel E. BECNEL, Jr.; Calvin C. Fayard, Jr.; D. Blayne Honeycutt; Joseph M. Bruno; Unidentified Parties, all other lawyers who may be admitted to the bar of this court, but who are similarly situated to the named respondents, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 295
Pages: 645–645

Head Matter:
Ashton R. O’DWYER, Jr., on his own behalf and on behalf of his clients in the “Victims of Katrina” litigation, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Daniel E. BECNEL, Jr.; Calvin C. Fayard, Jr.; D. Blayne Honeycutt; Joseph M. Bruno; Unidentified Parties, all other lawyers who may be admitted to the bar of this court, but who are similarly situated to the named respondents, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 08-30438
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Oct. 3, 2008.
Ashton R. O’Dwyer, Jr., New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
This appeal seeks review of the en banc determination of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana concerning the plaintiff-appellant's disciplinary complaint against defendant-appellees. Appellant lacks standing to appeal. The appeal is DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.