Case Name: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Burkhart
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1991-12-18
Citations: 62 Ohio St. 3d 252
Docket Number: No. 91-1769
Parties: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Burkhart.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 62
Pages: 252–253

Head Matter:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Burkhart.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Burkhart (1991), 62 Ohio St.3d 252.]
(No. 91-1769
Submitted October 9, 1991
Decided December 18, 1991.)
J. Warren Bettis, Disciplinary Counsel, and Sally Ann Steuk, for relator.
Spengler, Nathanson, Heyman, McCarthy & Durfee and Frank T. Pizza, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We find that respondent committed the misconduct found by the board and concur with its recommendation. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.