Case Name: Jose PAZ, Appellant, v. Francisco CAMBRONERO and Edwin Magrigal, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-05-17
Citations: 655 So. 2d 182
Docket Number: No. 94-2598
Parties: Jose PAZ, Appellant, v. Francisco CAMBRONERO and Edwin Magrigal, Appellees.
Judges: Before HUBBART, LEVY and GODERICH, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 655
Pages: 182–182

Head Matter:
Jose PAZ, Appellant, v. Francisco CAMBRONERO and Edwin Magrigal, Appellees.
No. 94-2598.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 17, 1995.
Rehearing Denied June 21, 1995.
Delgado, Befeler, Starkman & Magolnick and A. Jacqueline del Cristo and Douglas R. Gonzalez, Miami, for appellant.
Marlene Valdes and Humberto Cancio, Jr., Miami, for appellees.
Before HUBBART, LEVY and GODERICH, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. § 673.403(2), Fla.Stat. (1991); Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); Department of Transp. v. Spioch, 642 So.2d 788, 791 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Galloway v. Law Offices of Merkle, Bright & Sullivan, P.A., 596 So.2d 1205 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Havatampa Corp. v. Walton Drug Co., 354 So.2d 1235, 1237 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978).