Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Andrew BONNEY, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2014-01-14
Citations: 417 S.W.3d 833
Docket Number: No. ED 99442
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Andrew BONNEY, Appellant.
Judges: Before LISA S. VAN AMBURG, P.J., PATRICIA L. COHEN, J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 417
Pages: 833–834

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Andrew BONNEY, Appellant.
No. ED 99442.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Jan. 14, 2014.
Edward S. Thompson, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO for appellant.
Gregory L. Barnes, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before LISA S. VAN AMBURG, P.J., PATRICIA L. COHEN, J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Andrew Bonney (Defendant) appeals from a judgment entered in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis following his conviction on one count of child molestation in the first degree. Defendant claims that the trial court erred in denying Defendant's: (1) motion to dismiss on due process grounds; (2) motion to dismiss on double jeopardy grounds; and (3) motion to suppress his involuntary confession.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not err. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 80.25(b).