Case Name: Antonio WOODS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2013-10-29
Citations: 412 S.W.3d 905
Docket Number: No. ED 98686
Parties: Antonio WOODS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 412
Pages: 905–905

Head Matter:
Antonio WOODS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 98686.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Oct. 29, 2013.
Gwenda R. Robinson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Timothy A. Blackwell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The movant, Antonio Woods, appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties' briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.
The motion court's order denying the movant's Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).