Case Name: Dominic MAXWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2013-11-19
Citations: 414 S.W.3d 51
Docket Number: No. ED 99822
Parties: Dominic MAXWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 414
Pages: 51–51

Head Matter:
Dominic MAXWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 99822.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Nov. 19, 2013.
Dominic Maxwell, Jefferson City, MO, pro se.
Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Shaun J. Mackelprang, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Dominic Maxwell appeals the denial of his motion requesting a hearing to establish his reason for the untimely filing of his Rule 29.15 motion. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(5).