Case Name: Troy MARTIN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-12-26
Citations: 832 So. 2d 943
Docket Number: No. 3D02-2471
Parties: Troy MARTIN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before COPE, GERSTEN and SHEWN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 832
Pages: 943–944

Head Matter:
Troy MARTIN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D02-2471.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 26, 2002.
Troy Martin, in proper person.
Richard E. Doran, Attorney General, and Erin K. Zack, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before COPE, GERSTEN and SHEWN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Troy Martin appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, wherein defendant-appellant Martin asserts newly discovered evidence. The motion fails to set forth what the evidence was in the defendant's case, and how the claimed newly discovered evidence would have affected the outcome, if at all. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). This court's affirmance is without prejudice to the defendant to file an amended motion.
Affirmed.