Case Name: Richard BLAKE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BURGER KING CORP., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-08-22
Citations: 443 F. App'x 849
Docket Number: No. 11-1527
Parties: Richard BLAKE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. BURGER KING CORP., Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 443
Pages: 849–850

Head Matter:
Richard BLAKE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. BURGER KING CORP., Defendant—Appellee.
No. 11-1527.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 18, 2011.
Decided: Aug. 22, 2011.
Richard Blake, Appellant Pro Se. Tyler Brown, Jackson Lewis, LLP, Reston, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Richard Blake appeals the district court's order dismissing his employment discrimination suit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Blake v. Burger King Corp., No. 3:10-cv-00675-HEH, 2011 WL 1480049 (E.D.Va. Apr. 18, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.