Case Name: Rolando MARTINEZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, Defendant - Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-04-01
Citations: 124 F. App'x 806
Docket Number: No. 03-7764
Parties: Rolando MARTINEZ, Plaintiff — Appellant, v. BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, Defendant — Appellee.
Judges: Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 124
Pages: 806–806

Head Matter:
Rolando MARTINEZ, Plaintiff — Appellant, v. BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, Defendant — Appellee.
No. 03-7764.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 2, 2005.
Decided: April 1, 2005.
Rolando Martinez, Appellant pro se.
Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Rolando Martinez appeals a district court judgment and order summarily dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. The district court denied relief because the holding in Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 121 S.Ct. 2491, 150 L.Ed.2d 653 (2001), did not apply to inadmissible aliens like Martinez. In Clark v. Martinez, — U.S. — , 125 S.Ct. 716, 160 L.Ed.2d 734 (2005), the Supreme Court held the holding in Zadvydas did apply to inadmissible aliens. Accordingly, we vacate the district court judgment and remand for further proceedings. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
VACATED AND REMANDED