Case Name: HORWITZ v. REINERT
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1903-06-22
Citations: 84 N.Y.S. 254
Docket Number: 
Parties: HORWITZ v. REINERT.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 84
Pages: 254–254

Head Matter:
HORWITZ v. REINERT.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
June 22, 1903.)
1. Appeal—Judgment—Evidence—Sufficiency.
A judgment supported by evidence allowed to go in generally withput objection, and without the taking of a tenable exception, will not be disturbed on appeal, though the evidence is slight.
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Second Dis- ■ trict.
Action by Isaac Horwitz against Ferdinand Reinert. From a judg-. ment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.
Argued before FREEDMAN, P. J., and GILDERSLEEVE and MacLEAN, JJ.
James E. Smith, for appellant.
Nathaniel Levy, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a judgment for damages to personal property of the plaintiff, whose cart containing notions, fancy goods, and hardware was run down by a wagon belonging to the defendant,, and driven by one of his employés. ' Although resting upon very slight proof, and seemingly for a large amount, the judgment may not be disturbed, as the evidence, slight as it is, was allowed to go in, generally without objection, and without the taking of a tenable exception.
Judgment affirmed, with costs to the respondent.