Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Brian D. TURNER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-03-18
Citations: 316 F. App'x 790
Docket Number: No. 08-3182
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Brian D. TURNER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before TACHA, McKAY, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 316
Pages: 790–790

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Brian D. TURNER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-3182.
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
March 18, 2009.
Matthew T. Treaster, Office of United States Attorney, Wichita, KS, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
David J. Freund, Office of Federal Public Defender, Wichita, KS, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before TACHA, McKAY, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER AND JUDGMENT
DEANELL REECE TACHA, Circuit Judge.
In Chambers v. United States, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 687, 691, 172 L.Ed.2d 484 (2009), the Supreme Court held that failure to report to a penal institution does not involve conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another, and therefore a conviction for failure to report does not qualify as a violent felony under the Armed Career Criminal Act's ("ACCA") residual clause, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii). Brian D. Turner was sentenced under the ACCA in part because he has a prior conviction for failing to return to custody following temporary lawful leave. See Kan. Stat. Ann. § 21-3810(a); § 21-3809(b)(2). In this direct appeal, Mr. Turner challenges only his sentence, contending that the ACCA enhancement was inappropriate after Chambers. We agree. After Chambers, a conviction for failing to return to custody does not qualify as a violent felony under the ACCA. We therefore remand this matter to the United States District Court for the District of Kansas with instructions to vacate Mr. Turner's original sentence and to resentence him in accordance with this order and judgment and Chambers v. United States, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 687, 172 L.Ed.2d 484 (2009).
This order and judgment is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R.App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
. Both Mr. Turner and the government contend that Mr. Turner's other conviction under Kan. Slat. Ann. § 21-3 810(a), which apparently involved a so-called "walkaway" escape from a residential center, is also not a violent felony after Chambers. We do not reach this question. The ACCA does not apply regardless whether the other conviction qualifies as a violent felony, and on appeal Mr. Turner has asked only to be resentenced without application of the ACCA. To the extent the characterization of that conviction otherwise affects the calculation of Mr. Turner's sentence, however, the district court should consider the issue during resentencing.