Case Name: CITY OF MIAMI, Appellant, v. Jose A. JUAREZ and Cristino Nieves, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2004-02-11
Citations: 875 So. 2d 642
Docket Number: Nos. 3D01-2055, 3D01-1941
Parties: CITY OF MIAMI, Appellant, v. Jose A. JUAREZ and Cristino Nieves, Appellees.
Judges: Before GERSTEN, RAMIREZ, and WELLS, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 875
Pages: 642–642

Head Matter:
CITY OF MIAMI, Appellant, v. Jose A. JUAREZ and Cristino Nieves, Appellees.
Nos. 3D01-2055, 3D01-1941.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 11, 2004.
Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied June 16, 2004.
Alejandro Vilarello, City Attorney; Robert S. Glazier, for appellant.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and John Eddy Morrison, Assistant Public Defender, for appellees.
Before GERSTEN, RAMIREZ, and WELLS, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See City of Miami v. Wellman, 875 So.2d 635, 2004 WL 231192 (Fla. 3d DCA Feb. 4, 2004); Mulligan v. City of Hollywood, 871 So.2d 249 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); see also Dade County Sch. Bd. v. Radio Station WQBA, 731 So.2d 638(Fla.l999)(eoneluding that when faced with a decision to uphold or overturn a lower court's judgment, an appellate court must affirm the judgment if it is legally correct regardless of the reasons given by the trial court).