Case Name: Randy BOYD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-01-17
Citations: 572 So. 2d 1032
Docket Number: No. 90-934
Parties: Randy BOYD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: PETERSON, GRIFFIN and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 572
Pages: 1032–1032

Head Matter:
Randy BOYD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 90-934.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Jan. 17, 1991.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Paolo G. Annino, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and David G. Mersch, Daytona Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the lower court; however, as in Flowers v. State, 567 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990), we certify to the supreme court the following question:
DO FLORIDA'S UNIFORM SENTENCING GUIDELINES REQUIRE THAT LEGAL CONSTRAINT POINTS BE ASSESSED FOR EACH OFFENSE COMMITTED WHILE UNDER LEGAL CONSTRAINT?
PETERSON, GRIFFIN and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.