Case Name: Eugene WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. ROM CORPORATION, Defendant, Division of Employment Security, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-02-14
Citations: 186 S.W.3d 827
Docket Number: No. WD 65006
Parties: Eugene WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. ROM CORPORATION, Defendant, Division of Employment Security, Respondent.
Judges: Before HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, Presiding Judge, JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge and THOMAS H. NEWTON, Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 186
Pages: 827–827

Head Matter:
Eugene WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. ROM CORPORATION, Defendant, Division of Employment Security, Respondent.
No. WD 65006.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Feb. 14, 2006.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 28, 2006.
Eugene Williams, Raytown, pro se.
Marilyn G. Green, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, Presiding Judge, JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge and THOMAS H. NEWTON, Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant Eugene Williams appeals from an order issued by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying his application for unemployment benefits pursuant to § 288.050 based upon a finding that he had left his employment with ROM Corporation voluntarily and without good cause attributable to his work or his employer. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the Commission's order is supported by sufficient competent evidence in the record, that the Commission acted within its powers, that the decision was not procured by fraud, and that the facts found by the Commission support the award. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).