Case Name: In the Matter of Comir Realty Co., Inc., Appellant, v. Frederic S. Berman, as City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator, Respondent. (And Another Similar Proceeding.)
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1968-04-15
Citations: 29 A.D.2d 965
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Comir Realty Co., Inc., Appellant, v. Frederic S. Berman, as City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator, Respondent. (And Another Similar Proceeding.)
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 29
Pages: 965–965

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Comir Realty Co., Inc., Appellant, v. Frederic S. Berman, as City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator, Respondent. (And Another Similar Proceeding.)

Opinion:
Two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County, both dated October 21,1966, each dismissing a respective one of the two proceedings, reversed, on the law, without costs, and both proceedings remitted to the respondent City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator for the purpose of making a determination not inconsistent with the views expressed herein. No questions of fact were considered. In our opinion the record fails to disclose a rational basis for the determination by respondent that the boxed-in risers installed herein were " exposed " risers for Rent Commission purposes, thus limiting the increase in maximum monthly rental allowable therefor to $1 a month. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Hopkins, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.