Case Name: Joan K. DURKIN and Francis M. Durkin, her husband, Appellants, v. COSTA ARMATORI S.p.A., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1985-12-17
Citations: 481 So. 2d 506
Docket Number: No. 85-1317
Parties: Joan K. DURKIN and Francis M. Durkin, her husband, Appellants, v. COSTA ARMATORI S.p.A., Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 481
Pages: 506–506

Head Matter:
Joan K. DURKIN and Francis M. Durkin, her husband, Appellants, v. COSTA ARMATORI S.p.A., Appellee.
No. 85-1317.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 17, 1985.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 4, 1986.
Dennis G. King, Miami, for appellants.
Holland & Knight and Michael T. Moore and George Mencio, Jr., Miami, for appel-lee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The issue presented in this appeal is precisely the same as that considered by the Fifth Circuit in Hoffman v. Air India, 393 F.2d 507 (5th Cir.1968). See also Dombroff v. Eagle-Picker Industries, Inc., 450 So.2d 923 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 458 So.2d 272 (Fla.1984). Accordingly, we reverse the trial court's order dismissing the Dur-kins' amended complaint for lack of in per-sonam jurisdiction and remand for further proceedings.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.