Case Name: Keenan Kester COFIELD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; The United States Attorney General; United States Marshals Service, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-10-03
Citations: 201 F. App'x 931
Docket Number: No. 06-7121
Parties: Keenan Kester COFIELD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; The United States Attorney General; United States Marshals Service, Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 201
Pages: 931–931

Head Matter:
Keenan Kester COFIELD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; The United States Attorney General; United States Marshals Service, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 06-7121.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 26, 2006.
Decided: Oct. 3, 2006.
Keenan Kester Cofield, Appellant pro se.
Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Keenan Kester Cofield seeks to attack his federal sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). The district court dismissed the § 2241 petition without prejudice, because Cofield was not in federal custody at the time he filed the petition. Cofield appeals from the district court's subsequent order denying his motion to supplement, amend, or reconsider the denial of his § 2241 petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cofield v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No. 1:06-cv00697-CCB (D. Md. June 14, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.