Case Name: Samuel Chandler, Jr., Respondent, v. P. W. Chapman & Co., Inc., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1926-11
Citations: 218 A.D. 773
Docket Number: 
Parties: Samuel Chandler, Jr., Respondent, v. P. W. Chapman & Co., Inc., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 218
Pages: 773–774

Head Matter:
Samuel Chandler, Jr., Respondent, v. P. W. Chapman & Co., Inc., Appellant.

Opinion:
Faber, J.
Motion for judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that it fails to state a cause of action. The action is to recover damages for the alleged conversion of certain shares of the capital stock of the defendant. The only contentions of the defendant which I deem necessary to consider on this motion are (1) that there has been no demand made for the return of the stock before suit was brought and (2) that there is no allegation in the complaint of ownership in the plaintiff at the time the conversion took place. The allegation in the complaint that " during the months of January and February, 1926," plaintiff owned the stock in question is a sufficient statement that the plaintiff was the owner of the stock on or about the 16th day of February, 1926, when the conversion is alleged to have happened, and it would seem unnecessary to enter into any discussion to convince one of that fact. As to the defendant's other contention that no demand was made the law seems to be well settled that such "an allegation in the complaint is unnecessary. (Bernstein v. Warland, 33 Misc. 280; Milligan v. Brooklyn Warehouse & Storage Co., 34 id. 55; Industrial & General Trust v. Tod, 170 N. Y. 233, 264, 265.) The complaint clearly states a cause of action for conversion, and the motion is, therefore, denied, with ten dollars costs, with leave to the defendant to answer within ten days.