Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Ronald TUCKER, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-06-12
Citations: 367 S.W.3d 674
Docket Number: No. ED 96849
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Ronald TUCKER, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before KURT S. ODENWALD, C.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 367
Pages: 674–675

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Ronald TUCKER, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 96849.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
June 12, 2012.
Jessica P. Meredith, Jefferson City, MO, For Plaintiff/Respondent.
Loyce Ann Rhodes Hamilton, St. Louis, MO, For Defendanl/Appellant.
Before KURT S. ODENWALD, C.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Ronald Tucker appeals from the trial court's judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of one count of first-degree statutory sodomy, Section 566.062, and two counts of first-degree child molestation, Section 566.067. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and discern no plain error. State v. Speaks, 298 S.W.3d 70, 85 (Mo.App. E.D. 2009). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).
. All statutory references are to RSMo 2000, unless otherwise indicated.