Case Name: CITY OF NEWARK ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. JAMES BENJAMIN ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1976-10-06
Citations: 144 N.J. Super. 389
Docket Number: 
Parties: CITY OF NEWARK ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. JAMES BENJAMIN ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 144
Pages: 389–390

Head Matter:
CITY OF NEWARK ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. JAMES BENJAMIN ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued October 6, 1976
Decided October 6, 1976.
Before Judges Lynch, Milmed and Antell.
Mr. Bernard E. Freamon of the Rutgers Urban Legal Clinic, argued the cause for appellants.
' Mr. Salvatore Perillo, Eirst Assistant Corporation Counsel of the City of Newark, argued the cause for respondents {Mr. Milton A. Bucle, Corporation Counsel, attorney).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment entered in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, on September 2, 1976, is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated by Judge Yanoff in his opinion dated September 1, 1976.