Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward R. ZINNER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-07-02
Citations: 608 F. App'x 167
Docket Number: No. 14-2218
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward R. ZINNER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 608
Pages: 167–168

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward R. ZINNER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 14-2218.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 23, 2015.
Decided: July 2, 2015.
Marvin D. Miller, Law Offices of Marvin ' D. Miller, Alexandria, Virginia; Louis Napoleon Joynes, II, Joynes & Gaidies, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellant. Dana J. Boente, United States Attorney, Mark A. Exley, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Edward R. Zinner appeals from the district court's order dismissing his civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record included on appeal, as well as the parties' briefs, and find no error in the district court's ruling. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Zinner, No. with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.