Case Name: Alvaro QUEZADA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. A. HEDGPETH; et al., Defendants- Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-10-15
Citations: 296 F. App'x 585
Docket Number: No. 08-15919
Parties: Alvaro QUEZADA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. A. HEDGPETH; et al., Defendants— Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 296
Pages: 585–586

Head Matter:
Alvaro QUEZADA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. A. HEDGPETH; et al., Defendants— Appellees.
No. 08-15919.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 6, 2008.
Filed Oct. 15, 2008.
Alvaro Quezada, Delano, CA, pro se.
Before: WARDLAW, W. FLETCHER and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Upon review of the record and appellant's opening brief, this court hereby sum marily affirms the district court's order denying appellant's request for preliminary injunctive relief because the district court dismissed appellant's complaint prior to service. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 65(a)(1) (court may issue preliminary injunction only on notice to adverse party); see also United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (summary affirmance appropriate where result is clear from face of record); WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir.1997) (dismissal of complaint with leave to amend is not appealable).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provid ed by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.