Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Wayne MONTGOMERY, Appellant; Wayne MONTGOMERY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1992-06-23
Citations: 832 S.W.2d 21
Docket Number: No. 58885
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Wayne MONTGOMERY, Appellant. Wayne MONTGOMERY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 832
Pages: 21–22

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Wayne MONTGOMERY, Appellant. Wayne MONTGOMERY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 58885.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
June 23, 1992.
John Klosterman, St. Louis, for appellant.
William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Millie Aulbur, Joan F. Edwards, Asst. Attys. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Wayne Montgomery, appeals from his jury trial conviction in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis of one count of unlawful possession of a firearm, RSMo § 571.070 (1986), for which he was sentenced, as a prior and persistent offender, to ten years' imprisonment. Appellant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs, transcript and legal file and find no error on the part of the trial court. Nor do we find the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the motion court to be clearly erroneous. As we further find no precedential value would be served by a full opinion, we affirm appellant's conviction pursuant to Rule 30.25 and the denial of appellant's post-conviction relief motion pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our holding.