Case Name: PACIFIC TELESIS GROUP; Pacific Bell; Nevada Bell, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al.; Federal Communications Commission; Janet Reno, Attorney General, Defendants-Appellees, and California Cable Television Association, Intervenor-Appellee; US WEST, INC.; US West Communications; US West Multimedia Communications, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, and Washington Independent Telephone Association; Pacific Telecom, Inc. (PTI), and its Subsidiaries, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellees, v. UNITED STATES of America; Federal Communications Commission; Janet Reno, Attorney General, Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1996-05-24
Citations: 84 F.3d 1153
Docket Number: Nos. 94-16064, 94-35775
Parties: PACIFIC TELESIS GROUP; Pacific Bell; Nevada Bell, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al.; Federal Communications Commission; Janet Reno, Attorney General, Defendants-Appellees, and California Cable Television Association, Intervenor-Appellee. US WEST, INC.; US West Communications; US West Multimedia Communications, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, and Washington Independent Telephone Association; Pacific Telecom, Inc. (PTI), and its Subsidiaries, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellees, v. UNITED STATES of America; Federal Communications Commission; Janet Reno, Attorney General, Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: Before: ALARCON and HALL, Circuit Judges, and KING, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 84
Pages: 1153–1154

Head Matter:
PACIFIC TELESIS GROUP; Pacific Bell; Nevada Bell, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al.; Federal Communications Commission; Janet Reno, Attorney General, Defendants-Appellees, and California Cable Television Association, Intervenor-Appellee. US WEST, INC.; US West Communications; US West Multimedia Communications, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, and Washington Independent Telephone Association; Pacific Telecom, Inc. (PTI), and its Subsidiaries, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellees, v. UNITED STATES of America; Federal Communications Commission; Janet Reno, Attorney General, Defendants-Appellants.
Nos. 94-16064, 94-35775.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 24, 1996.
Before: ALARCON and HALL, Circuit Judges, and KING, District Judge.
The Honorable Samuel P. King, Senior District Judge for the District of Hawaii, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
ORDER
The joint motion of the parties in case no. 94-16064, which was filed with the court on April 29, 1996, is GRANTED. This case is hereby remanded to the district court. The district court order of May 17, 1994, shall be vacated and the case dismissed as moot.
Case no. 94-35775 is hereby remanded to the district court. The district court shall vacate its order granting summary judgment and the case shall be dismissed as moot.