Case Name: George Cale BUCKNER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Marvin POLK, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-10-04
Citations: 466 F.3d 280
Docket Number: No. 05-14
Parties: George Cale BUCKNER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Marvin POLK, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 466
Pages: 280–284

Head Matter:
George Cale BUCKNER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Marvin POLK, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 05-14.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Oct. 4, 2006.
Joseph Edward Zeszotarski, Jr., Poyner & Spruill, Raleigh, NC, E. Fitzgerald Parnell, III, Poyner & Spruill, LLP, Charlotte, NC, for Petitioner-Appellant.
Steven Franklin Bryant, Assistant Attorney General, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, NC, for Respondent-Appellee.

Opinion:
ORDER
Appellant filed a petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc.
Judge Shedd and Judge Duncan voted to deny panel rehearing. Judge Gregory voted to grant panel rehearing.
A member of the Court requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc. A majority of the judges in active service voted to deny rehearing en banc. Chief Judge Wilkins and Judges Widener, Wilkinson, Niemeyer, Williams, Michael, Motz, Traxler, King, Shedd, and Duncan voted to deny rehearing en banc. Judge Gregory voted to grant rehearing en banc.
The Court denies the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc.
Judge Duncan wrote an opinion concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc. Judge Gregory wrote a dissenting opinion. Entered at the direction of Judge Duncan for the Court.