Case Name: Gustavo VENTA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2008-12-31
Citations: 126 So. 3d 254
Docket Number: No. 3D08-2757
Parties: Gustavo VENTA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before GERSTEN, C.J., SHEPHERD, J., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 126
Pages: 254–255

Head Matter:
Gustavo VENTA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D08-2757.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 31, 2008.
Gustavo Venta, in proper person.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before GERSTEN, C.J., SHEPHERD, J., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Gustavo Venta (defendant) appeals from the denial of his motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm.
Defendants motion raises several grounds for relief. We agree with the trial court that only one ground was timely raised — that defendants plea was involuntary because the trial court failed to advise him of the deportation consequences of the plea. Defendants motion fails to allege that the conviction in this case is the sole basis for his deportation as required under State v. Green, 944 So.2d 208 (Fla.2006). See, e.g., Dumenigo v. State, 988 So.2d 1201 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008); Rodriques v. State, 980 So.2d 1203 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).
Accordingly, we affirm the order under review, but remand for the trial court to give defendant an opportunity to file an amended motion correcting the deficiency, if possible. Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754 (Fla.2007).
Affirmed, and remanded with instructions.