Case Name: HEARN INSULATION AND IMPROVEMENT COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carlos BONILLA; Premium Construction Services Corporation, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-12-06
Citations: 456 F. App'x 311
Docket Number: No. 11-1118
Parties: HEARN INSULATION AND IMPROVEMENT COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Carlos BONILLA; Premium Construction Services Corporation, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 456
Pages: 311–312

Head Matter:
HEARN INSULATION AND IMPROVEMENT COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Carlos BONILLA; Premium Construction Services Corporation, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 11-1118.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 18, 2011.
Decided: Dec. 6, 2011.
Jeffrey M. Schwaber, Mary Craine Lombardo, Laura M. Gagliuso, Stein, Sperling, Bennett, De Jong, Driscoll & Greenfeig, P.C., Rockville, Maryland, for Appellant. Christopher R. Wampler, Wampler & Souder, LLC, Kensington, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Hearn Insulation and Improvement Company, Inc., appeals the district court's order denying its motion for attorney's fees incurred in its action against Carlos Bonilla and his company, Premium Construction Services Corporation. We have reviewed the record and the briefs submitted by the parties, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hearn Insulation and Improvement Co., Inc. v. Bonilla, No. 8:09-cv-00990-AW, 2011 WL 220091 (D.Md. Jan. 21, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.