Case Name: Richard E. HIBBOTT, Appellant, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-04-13
Citations: 616 So. 2d 194
Docket Number: No. 92-1710
Parties: Richard E. HIBBOTT, Appellant, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, et al., Appellees.
Judges: WIGGINTON and MICKLE, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, ALAN R., Associate Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 616
Pages: 194–194

Head Matter:
Richard E. HIBBOTT, Appellant, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, et al., Appellees.
No. 92-1710.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
April 13, 1993.
Richard E. Hibbott, pro se.
Kurt E. Ahrendt of Florida Parole Com’n, Tallahassee, for appellee Florida Parole Com’n.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Hibbott's application for mandamus was properly denied because he did not show a clear legal right to the advanceable control release date he sought, or that the Florida Parole Commission had a clear legal duty to grant it. See King v. Florida Parole Commission, 614 So.2d 1183 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).
Affirmed.
WIGGINTON and MICKLE, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, ALAN R., Associate Judge, concur.