Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David WRIGHT, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-06-30
Citations: 605 F. App'x 224
Docket Number: No. 15-6553
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David WRIGHT, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before GREGORY, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 605
Pages: 224–224

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David WRIGHT, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-6553.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 25, 2015.
Decided: June 30, 2015.
David Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Leesa Washington, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Ap-pellee.
Before GREGORY, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
David Wright appeals the district court's order denying relief on his motion for a sentence reduction, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the.reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Wright, No. 6:05-cr01163-HMH-1 (D.S.C. Apr. 7, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.