Case Name: JOHN K. P. VOIGHT, RESPONDENT, v. McEWAN BROTHERS, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1936-01-31
Citations: 116 N.J.L. 218
Docket Number: 
Parties: JOHN K. P. VOIGHT, RESPONDENT, v. McEWAN BROTHERS, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 116
Pages: 218–218

Head Matter:
JOHN K. P. VOIGHT, RESPONDENT, v. McEWAN BROTHERS, APPELLANT.
Submitted October 25, 1935 —
Decided January 31, 1936.
For the respondent, Herman M. Cone.
For the appellant, Clarence B. Tippiti.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Lloyd, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.