Case Name: LONG et al. v. LONG
Court: Supreme Court of Texas
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1939-10-04
Citations: 138 S.W.2d 798
Docket Number: Application No. 24441
Parties: LONG et al. v. LONG.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 138
Pages: 798–798

Head Matter:
133 Tex. 623
LONG et al. v. LONG.
Application No. 24441.
Supreme Court of Texas.
Oct. 4, 1939.
Fred'H. Minor, of Denton, and W. F. Bane, Charles E. Long, Jr., and Storey, Sanders, Sherill & Armstrong, all of Dallas, 'for plaintiffs in error Frank O. Long and others.
Thompson, Knight, Baker, Harris & Wright, of Dallas, for defendant in error Frances Mae Long.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is the second appeal of this case to this court. The opinion in the former appeal is reported at 133 Tex. 96, 125 S.W.2d 1034. In the former appeal we remanded this cause to the Court of Civil Appeals to pass on the assignments of the appellant raising the issue of the insufficiency of the evidence to support the findings of the jury on certain issues fully set out in our original opinion. After the judgment of this court became final, the record was returned to the Court of Civil Appeals, and that court, after considering the assignments raising the question of insufficiency above indicated, overruled the same. We have no jurisdiction to disturb such ruling. It is therefore ordered that this application be "Dismissed W. O. J."