Case Name: Adam NAEGER, Appellant, v. ESURANCE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2019-06-28
Citations: 578 S.W.3d 853
Docket Number: ED 107178
Parties: Adam NAEGER, Appellant,
v.
ESURANCE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.
Judges: Before Lisa P. Page, C.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Robert M. Clayton III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 578
Pages: 853–854

Head Matter:
Adam NAEGER, Appellant,
v.
ESURANCE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.
ED 107178
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Filed: June 28, 2019
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 29, 2019
Brian Fellows, Fellows & Blake, LLC, 13421 Manchester Road, Suite 105, St. Louis, MO 63131, for appellant.
Michael D. Cerulo, Erica L. Briscoe, Baty, Holm, Nurmich & Otto, P.C., 7711 Bonhomme Ave., Suite 901, St. Louis, MO 63105, for respondent.
Before Lisa P. Page, C.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Robert M. Clayton III, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Adam Naeger ("Naeger") appeals the trial court's judgment granting summary judgment in favor of Esurance Property and Casualty Insurance Company ("Esurance"). We affirm.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).