Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jorge Alejandro CARRILLO SIFUENTES, also known as Jorge Alejandro Carrillo, also known as Jorge Alejandro Carillo-Sifuentes, also known as George Alex Tarin, also known as Jorge Alejandro Carrillo-Sifuentes, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-02-15
Citations: 411 F. App'x 755
Docket Number: No. 10-20254
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jorge Alejandro CARRILLO SIFUENTES, also known as Jorge Alejandro Carrillo, also known as Jorge Alejandro Carillo-Sifuentes, also known as George Alex Tarin, also known as Jorge Alejandro CarrilloSifuentes, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before HIGGINBOTHAM, GARZA, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 411
Pages: 755–755

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jorge Alejandro CARRILLO SIFUENTES, also known as Jorge Alejandro Carrillo, also known as Jorge Alejandro Carillo-Sifuentes, also known as George Alex Tarin, also known as Jorge Alejandro CarrilloSifuentes, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-20254
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Feb. 15, 2011.
James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Molly Estelle Odom, Esq., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, GARZA, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jorge Alejandro Carrillo Sifuentes has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Carrillo Sifuentes has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel's brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.