Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Craig HILL, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2010-03-09
Citations: 330 S.W.3d 503
Docket Number: No. ED 92433
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Craig HILL, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 330
Pages: 503–503

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Craig HILL, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 92433.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
March 9, 2010.
Lisa M. Stroup, St. Louis, MO, for Defendant/Appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for Plaintiff/Respondent.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Craig Hill (Appellant) appeals from the trial court's judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of first-degree murder, two counts of first-degree assault, and three counts of armed criminal action. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court committed no plain error. Rule 30.20 ; State v. Washington, 260 S.W.3d 875, 879 (Mo.App. E.D.2008). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2008, unless otherwise indicated.