Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Leroy SHORE, Appellant; Leroy SHOBE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1994-12-20
Citations: 888 S.W.2d 768
Docket Number: Nos. 61561, 66067
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Leroy SHORE, Appellant. Leroy SHOBE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before REINHARD, P.J., and CRANE and CRAHAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 888
Pages: 768–769

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Leroy SHORE, Appellant. Leroy SHOBE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 61561, 66067.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Dec. 20, 1994.
Robert E. Steele, Jr., St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Michelle A. Freund, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before REINHARD, P.J., and CRANE and CRAHAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
In a consolidated appeal, Leroy Shobe ("Defendant") challenges his conviction by a jury of burglary in the first degree, for which he was sentenced to twenty years imprisonment as a prior and persistent offender, and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion alleging ineffective assistance of counsel.
We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error asserted on direct appeal are without merit. Further, the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would not serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).