Case Name: Joseph McCUSKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-12-24
Citations: 93 S.W.3d 845
Docket Number: No. ED 80914
Parties: Joseph McCUSKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before MARY R. RUSSELL, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 93
Pages: 845–846

Head Matter:
Joseph McCUSKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 80914.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Dec. 24, 2002.
Lawrence L. Pratt, Assistant State Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Patrick T. Morgan, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before MARY R. RUSSELL, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Joseph McCusker ("Movant") appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. A detailed opinion would be of no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a brief memorandum opinion, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).