Case Name: In Re: Condemnation by the Redevelopment Authority of the County of Dauphin etc. Jack E. Hamman and Mary Hamman and Clifford Bailey, Jr., Appellants
Court: Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1983-10-28
Citations: 78 Pa. Commw. 148
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 2021 C.D. 1982
Parties: In Re: Condemnation by the Redevelopment Authority of the County of Dauphin etc. Jack E. Hamman and Mary Hamman and Clifford Bailey, Jr., Appellants.
Judges: before Judges Rogers, MaoPhail and Barry, sitting as a panel of three.
Reporter: Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court Reports
Volume: 78
Pages: 148–149

Head Matter:
In Re: Condemnation by the Redevelopment Authority of the County of Dauphin etc. Jack E. Hamman and Mary Hamman and Clifford Bailey, Jr., Appellants.
Argued September 14,1983,
before Judges Rogers, MaoPhail and Barry, sitting as a panel of three.
Lee C. Swartz, with him Stephen M. Greeeher, Jr., Hepford, Swartz, Menaker & Wilt, for appellants.
Robert D. Hanson, with him Richard G. Ruben, Hanson and Ruben, for appellees.
October 28, 1983:

Opinion:
Per Curiam
Memorandum Opinion,
We affirm the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County on the opinion of Judge Warren O. Morgan, In Re: Condemnation by The Redevelopment Authority of the County of Dauphin, In Connection with the Paul J. Leicht Urban Renewal Project, Pa. D. & C.3rd (19 ).
Per Curiam Order
And Now, this 28th day of October, 1983, the order of the Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas dated July 19, 1982, in the above-eaptioned matter is affirmed.
We note that the date of the filing of additional preliminary objections was May 20, 1982, not May 20, 1981, as Judge Morgan's opinion records.