Case Name: McClung Drug Company, appellant, v. City Realty and Investment Company et al., respondents
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1920-10-21
Citations: 92 N.J. Eq. 237
Docket Number: 
Parties: McClung Drug Company, appellant, v. City Realty and Investment Company et al., respondents.
Judges: For affirmance—The Ci-iief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, Katzenbacii, White, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, Aokerson—14.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 92
Pages: 237–237

Head Matter:
McClung Drug Company, appellant, v. City Realty and Investment Company et al., respondents.
[Decided October 21st, 1920.]
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Baekes, whose opinion is reported in 91 N. 3. Eq. me.
Messrs. Wight, Wight £ Golenboch, for the appellant.
Mr. Thomas Brotan and Mr. Leo Goldberger, for the respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Baekes.
For affirmance—The Ci-iief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, Katzenbacii, White, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, Aokerson—14.
For reversal—None