Case Name: Janice McLean DELOATCH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HARFORD COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-01-25
Citations: 408 F. App'x 686
Docket Number: No. 10-1748
Parties: Janice McLean DELOATCH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HARFORD COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 408
Pages: 686–687

Head Matter:
Janice McLean DELOATCH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HARFORD COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 10-1748.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 18, 2011.
Decided: Jan. 25, 2011.
Janice McLean DeLoatch, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Bruce Schwartzman, Lisa Y. Settles, Hodes, Pessin & Katz, PA, Tow-son, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Janice McLean DeLoatch appeals the district court's order granting Defendant's motion to dismiss her complaint alleging race discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e to 2000e-17 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. DeLoatch v. Harford Cnty. Bd. of Educ., No. 1:09-cv-03125-CCB, 2010 WL 1956804 (D.Md. May 14, 2010). We further deny DeLoatch's motion for transcript at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.