Case Name: Camden Mortgage Guaranty and Title Company et al., respondents, v. Elizabeth K. Haines, appellant
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1932-05-16
Citations: 110 N.J. Eq. 461
Docket Number: 
Parties: Camden Mortgage Guaranty and Title Company et al., respondents, v. Elizabeth K. Haines, appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 110
Pages: 461–465

Head Matter:
Camden Mortgage Guaranty and Title Company et al., respondents, v. Elizabeth K. Haines, appellant.
[Submitted February 12th, 1932.
Decided May 16th, 1932.]
Messrs. French, Richards & Bradley, for the appellant.
Messrs. Blealcly, Stoclcwell & Burling, for the respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning, which rests upon the reasoning of the ease of Camden Mortgage Guaranty and Title Co. v. Borton, above set out.
.For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Teenchaed, Paekee, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Van Bus•kiek, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.