Case Name: Michael Dale SIMPSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FCC FORREST CITY LOW, MEDICAL DEPARTMENT; B. Wooten, Registered Nurse, FCC Forrest City Low; M. Wingo, Physician Assistant, FCC Forrest City Low; Charles Miller, Unit Counselor, FCC Forrest City Low, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-12-21
Citations: 626 F. App'x 195
Docket Number: No. 15-1775
Parties: Michael Dale SIMPSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FCC FORREST CITY LOW, MEDICAL DEPARTMENT; B. Wooten, Registered Nurse, FCC Forrest City Low; M. Wingo, Physician Assistant, FCC Forrest City Low; Charles Miller, Unit Counselor, FCC Forrest City Low, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 626
Pages: 195–195

Head Matter:
Michael Dale SIMPSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FCC FORREST CITY LOW, MEDICAL DEPARTMENT; B. Wooten, Registered Nurse, FCC Forrest City Low; M. Wingo, Physician Assistant, FCC Forrest City Low; Charles Miller, Unit Counselor, FCC Forrest City Low, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15-1775.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 26, 2015.
Filed: Dec. 21, 2015.
Michael Dale Simpson, Forrest City, AR, pro se.
Jamie Goss Dempsey, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Little Rock, AR, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Federal inmate Michael Simpson brought this pro se action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), asserting medical deliberate-indifference claims, among other claims. Simpson appeals after the district court denied his motion for a preliminary injunction, concluded that all of his claims failed as a matter of law, granted defendants' motion to dismiss or for summary judgment, and entered judgment dismissing the case with prejudice. Also pending are Simpson's motions to "change- the style of the case," and for reconsideration of an order entered by the clerk's office.
Upon careful review, we first conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Simpson's motion for a preliminary injunction. See Dataphase Sys. Inc. v. C.L. Sys., Inc., 640 F.2d 109, 114 (8th Cir.1981) (en banc). We further conclude that the district court appropriately disposed of Simpson's claims, because, among other reasons, the record established beyond genuine dispute that defendants were not deliberately indifferent to Simpson's serious medical needs. See Allard v. Baldwin, 779 F.3d 768, 771-72 (8th Cir.2015).
Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. In addition, Simpson's pending motions are denied.
. The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.