Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis Alberto GARCIA, a.k.a. Luis Alberto Juares-Garcia, a.k.a. Luis Alberto Juarez-Garcia, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-11-03
Citations: 457 F. App'x 681
Docket Number: No. 10-10107
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Luis Alberto GARCIA, a.k.a. Luis Alberto Juares-Garcia, a.k.a. Luis Alberto Juarez-Garcia, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: TROTT, GOULD, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 457
Pages: 681–681

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Luis Alberto GARCIA, a.k.a. Luis Alberto Juares-Garcia, a.k.a. Luis Alberto Juarez-Garcia, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 10-10107.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 25, 2011.
Filed Nov. 3, 2011.
Christina Marie Cabanillas, Assistant U.S. Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Nathan Donlon Leonardo, Leonardo Law Offices, PLLC, Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: TROTT, GOULD, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Luis Alberto Garcia appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 42-month sentence imposed for re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Garcia's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.