Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ruthven YOUNG, a/k/a Ra Ra, Defendant-Appellant; United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ashberth Sherran Guerra, Defendant-Appellant; United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Don Anthony Guerra, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-03-11
Citations: 30 F. App'x 261
Docket Number: Nos. 01-7712, 01-7777, 01-7806
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ruthven YOUNG, a/k/a Ra Ra, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ashberth Sherran Guerra, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Don Anthony Guerra, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 30
Pages: 261–261

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ruthven YOUNG, a/k/a Ra Ra, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ashberth Sherran Guerra, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Don Anthony Guerra, Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 01-7712, 01-7777, 01-7806.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 21, 2002.
Decided March 11, 2002.
Ruthven Young, Ashberth Sherran Guerra, Don Anthony Guerra, Appellants Pro Se. Bruce Howe Hendricks, Office of the United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellants seek to appeal the district court's order denying their motions filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny certificates of appealability and dismiss the appeals on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Young, Nos. CR-92-445, CA-96-2874-8-2 (D.S.C. Oct. 2, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.