Case Name: Loretta SCHRADER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2001-04-11
Citations: 782 So. 2d 967
Docket Number: No. 3D00-2450
Parties: Loretta SCHRADER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before GERSTEN, GODERICH and SHEVIN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 782
Pages: 967–968

Head Matter:
Loretta SCHRADER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D00-2450.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 11, 2001.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Howard K. Blumberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A^ Butterworth, Attorney General, and Mark Rosenblatt, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before GERSTEN, GODERICH and SHEVIN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the order revoking defendant's probation for failure to submit to urinalysis upon the probation officer's request. See Manon v. State, 740 So.2d 1253, 1256 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)(whether probationer's violation is willful and substantial is question of fact; trial court's determination will not be overturned unless there is no supporting evidence). However, we strike that portion of the order finding that defendant violated probation by failing to pay costs of supervision. As the state properly concedes, the court granted defendant's motion for judgment of acquittal as to that alleged violation.
Affirmed as modified.