Case Name: Hudson and Manhattan Railroad Company, Respondent, v. Humboldt Exploration Company et al., Defendants, and Edwin H. Snyder, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1915-05-25
Citations: 215 N.Y. 668
Docket Number: 
Parties: Hudson and Manhattan Railroad Company, Respondent, v. Humboldt Exploration Company et al., Defendants, and Edwin H. Snyder, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 215
Pages: 668–669

Head Matter:
Hudson and Manhattan Railroad Company, Respondent, v. Humboldt Exploration Company et al., Defendants, and Edwin H. Snyder, Appellant.
(Argued May 10, 1915;
decided May 25, 1915.)
Hudson & Manhattan B. B. Co. v. Snyder, 156 App. Div. 935, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 13, 1918, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury in an action to recover upon a promissory note. The defense of defendant Snyder was that he was an accommodation indorser on a note given without consideration in renewal of a note already merged in a judgment; i. e., a former adjudication of and money judgment for the indebtedness.
Jacob Landy and Isaac N. Miller for appellant.
Lansing P. Peed for respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Werner, Chase, OUDDEBACK, ÜOGAN, MILLER and SeABURY, JJ.