Case Name: JARVIS v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1937-10-13
Citations: 110 S.W.2d 1154
Docket Number: No. 18910
Parties: JARVIS v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 110
Pages: 1154–1155

Head Matter:
JARVIS v. STATE.
No. 18910.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Oct. 13, 1937.
Rehearing Denied Dec. 15, 1937.
Sam J. Hamilton, of Memphis, and Mahan & Broughton, of Childress, for appellant.
Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
LATTIMORE, 'judge.
Conviction for violating the Texas Liquor Control Act, Vernon's Ann.P.C. art. 666 —1 et seq.; punishment, a fine of $500 and six months' confinement in the county jail.
The questions raised upon this appeal are the refusal of the court to quash the indictment because of the failure to negative certain exceptions claimed to be in the statute; and because of the refusal of the court to submit the question as to whether the inspectors, who bought the liquor alleged to have been sold in violation of law, were accomplices. These questions have been disposed of adversely to appellant in the case of Baker v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 106 S.W.2d 308, and other cases, and in the case of Stevens v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 110 S.W.2d 906, opinion this day handled down.
Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.