Case Name: IN the INTEREST OF K.A.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2015-12-22
Citations: 483 S.W.3d 864
Docket Number: No. ED 102876
Parties: IN the INTEREST OF K.A.
Judges: Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Roy L. Richter, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 483
Pages: 864–865

Head Matter:
IN the INTEREST OF K.A.
No. ED 102876
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
FILED: December 22, 2015
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied February 11, 2016
Application for Transfer Denied April 5, 2016
Kathleen Collins Dubois, Legal Services of Eastern Missouri, 501 S. Brentwood Blvd., Clayton, MO 63105, Attorney for Appellant.
Krista Peyton for Juvenile Officer, 501 S. Brentwood, St. Louis, MO 63105, Kimberly Lynn Steuterman, Stinson Leonard Street LLP, Co-Counsel for Respondent, 7700 Forsyth Blvd., Suite 100, St. Louis, MO 63105, Deborah C.M. Henry, Guardian Ad Litem for K.A., D.C, and D.C., Curtis, Heinz, Garrett & O’Keefe, P.C., 130 South Bemiston Avenue, Suite 200, St. Louis, MO 63105, Attorneys for Respondent.
Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Roy L. Richter, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
M.A. (Mother) appeals from the juvenile division of the trial .court's judgment terminating Mother's parental rights to her children, K.A., D.C., and D.A.C. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).