Case Name: Walter L. KING, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Bobby G. COMPTON, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-07-21
Citations: 102 F. App'x 805
Docket Number: No. 04-6458
Parties: Walter L. KING, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Bobby G. COMPTON, Respondent—Appellee.
Judges: Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 102
Pages: 805–806

Head Matter:
Walter L. KING, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Bobby G. COMPTON, Respondent—Appellee.
No. 04-6458.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 15, 2004.
Decided: July 21, 2004.
Walter L. King, Appellant pro se.
Julie C. Dudley, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not. binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Walter L. King, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See King v. Compton, No. CA-03-193-7 (W.D.Va. Feb. 19, 2004). We deny King's motion for appointment of appellate counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED