Case Name: ALPHA DATA CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. HX5, L.L.C., a Florida limited liability company, Timothy Deckert, individually, Margarita Howard, individually, Tracy Allen, individually, Charles Brasfeild, individually, and individually Margarita Howard, Infopro Corporation, an Alabama Corporation, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2013-10-18
Citations: 123 So. 3d 155
Docket Number: Nos. 1D12-2886, 1D12-5140
Parties: ALPHA DATA CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. HX5, L.L.C., a Florida limited liability company, Timothy Deckert, individually, Margarita Howard, individually, Tracy Allen, individually, Charles Brasfeild, individually, and individually Margarita Howard, Infopro Corporation, an Alabama Corporation, Appellees.
Judges: BENTON and CLARK, JJ., concur; THOMAS, J., Dissents with Opinion.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 123
Pages: 155–156

Head Matter:
ALPHA DATA CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. HX5, L.L.C., a Florida limited liability company, Timothy Deckert, individually, Margarita Howard, individually, Tracy Allen, individually, Charles Brasfeild, individually, and individually Margarita Howard, Infopro Corporation, an Alabama Corporation, Appellees.
Nos. 1D12-2886, 1D12-5140
(Consolidated).
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Oct. 18, 2013.
M. Hope Keating and Barry Richard of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Tallahassee; A. Benjamin Gordon and Wesley Levins of Keefe, Anchors & Gordon, P.A., Fort Walton Beach, for Appellant.
Charles F. Beall, Jr., and Tiffany A. Sullivan of Moore, Hill & Westmoreland, P.A., Pensacola; Richard J.R. Raleigh, Jr. and Andrew D. Dill of Wilmer & Lee, P.A., Huntsville, AL, for Appellees InfoPro Corporation and Charles Brasfeild.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this case, which is travelling with Alpha Data Corporation v. HX5, L.L.C., etc., et al., - So.3d -, No. 1D12-2885 (Fla. 1st DCA October 18, 2013), Appellant appeals the trial court's summary judgment in favor of Appellees on Appellant's counts of tortious interference with a contract and advantageous business relationship and the court's award of costs to Appellees. As in the companion case, genuine issues of material fact exist to preclude Appellees' entitlement to summary judgment. Thus, we reverse the summary judgment and costs award and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
BENTON and CLARK, JJ., concur; THOMAS, J., Dissents with Opinion.