Case Name: Kevin SKOLNICK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-12-27
Citations: 775 So. 2d 1001
Docket Number: No. 4D00-3053
Parties: Kevin SKOLNICK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: POLEN, STEVENSON and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 775
Pages: 1001–1001

Head Matter:
Kevin SKOLNICK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D00-3053.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Dec. 27, 2000.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 2, 2001.
Kevin Skolnick, Arcadia, pro se. .
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Joseph A. Tringali, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Kevin Skolnick challenges his sentence, claiming that the trial court erred in imposing a habitual offender sentence as a result of a violation of probation. We agree for the reasons discussed in our recent opinion in McFadden v. State, 773 So.2d 1237 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) analyzing Welling v. State, 748 So.2d 314 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) and King v. State, 681 So.2d 1136, 1138-39 (Fla.1996).
As in McFadden we reverse and remand the case with instructions that Skolnick be sentenced according to the sentencing guidelines.
POLEN, STEVENSON and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.