Case Name: SOCIETY FOR ESTABLISHING USEFUL MANUFACTURES, APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT ET AL., RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1918-01-31
Citations: 91 N.J.L. 718
Docket Number: 
Parties: SOCIETY FOR ESTABLISHING USEFUL MANUFACTURES, APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT ET AL., RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 91
Pages: 718–718

Head Matter:
SOCIETY FOR ESTABLISHING USEFUL MANUFACTURES, APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT ET AL., RESPONDENT.
Argued November 27, 1917
Decided January 31, 1918.
On appeal from tlie Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported 'in 90 N. J. L. 469.
For the appellant, Humphreys & Sumner.
For the respondent, John W. Wescott, Spaulding Frazer, Harry Kalisch and Francis Scott.

Opinion:
Pee Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Black in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Garrison, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.