Case Name: Isaac D. Zeeman et al., Respondents, v. Joseph Rosenthal, Appellant
Court: New York City Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1900-10
Citations: 32 Misc. 777
Docket Number: 
Parties: Isaac D. Zeeman et al., Respondents, v. Joseph Rosenthal, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 32
Pages: 777–777

Head Matter:
Isaac D. Zeeman et al., Respondents, v. Joseph Rosenthal, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York in favor of plaintiffs.
Louis Levy, for appellant.
Max D. Steuer (Abraham S. Levy, of counsel), for respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The promise of defendant was not a promise to answer for the debt or default of another. It was an original promise. It was not necessary that it should have been in writing.
We think that no error was committed, and the judgment must he affirmed, with costs.
Present: Fitzsimons, Ch. J., Conlan and Hascall, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.