Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Riley BRIONES, Jr., also known as Spitz Mr, Defendant-Appellant; United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Riley Briones, Sr., also known as Joker, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-06-23
Citations: 186 F. App'x 801
Docket Number: Nos. 03-16300, 03-16302; D.C. Nos. CV-99-02094-RCB-04, CR-96-00464-RCB-04; D.C. Nos. CV-99-02169-RCB-03, CR-96-00464-RCB-03
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Riley BRIONES, Jr., also known as Spitz Mr, Defendant—Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Riley Briones, Sr., also known as Joker, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before CANBY, BEEZER, and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 186
Pages: 801–802

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Riley BRIONES, Jr., also known as Spitz Mr, Defendant—Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Riley Briones, Sr., also known as Joker, Defendant—Appellant.
Nos. 03-16300, 03-16302.
D.C. Nos. CV-99-02094-RCB04, CR-96-00464-RCB-04.
D.C. Nos. CV-99-02169-RCB03, CR-96-00464-RCB-03.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
June 23, 2006.
Patrick Joseph Schneider, USPX — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff — Appellee.
Riley Briones, Jr., also known as Spitz Mr., USPB — U.S. Penitentiary, Beaumont, TX, pro se.
Riley Briones, Sr., also known as Joker, FCIP — Federal Correctional Institution (Phoenix), Phoenix, AZ, pro se.
Before CANBY, BEEZER, and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
The memorandum disposition filed on March 17, 2006, is vacated, and these consolidated cases are withdrawn from submission to this panel.
Counsel will be appointed in a separate order.
Because we have vacated the memorandum disposition filed on March 17, 2006, and withdrawn these cases from submission to this panel, appellants' petitions for panel rehearing and petitions for rehearing en banc are denied as moot.
The Clerk has recalled the mandates issued in these consolidated cases, so appellants' motions to recall the mandate are also denied as moot.