Case Name: Town of Conklin, Respondent, v. Douglas Ritter, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2002-02-07
Citations: 97 N.Y.2d 712
Docket Number: 
Parties: Town of Conklin, Respondent, v Douglas Ritter, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 97
Pages: 712–713

Head Matter:
[765 NE2d 851, 739 NYS2d 355]
Town of Conklin, Respondent, v Douglas Ritter, Appellant.
Decided February 7, 2002
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Douglas Ritter, appellant pro se.
Coughlin & Gerhart, L. L. P., Binghamton (Keith A. O’Hara of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. The courts below correctly concluded that the State Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code applies to defendant's building. Defendant's remaining arguments are either unpreserved or without merit.
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley, Rosenblatt and Graffeo concur.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.