Case Name: Alfred A. BERVING and Cyrilla Berving d/b/a Rockport, Inc. and Rockport, Inc., Respondents, v. Rita PATRICK and R & R Company and R & R Company, d/b/a R & R Sign Company, Appellants
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-03-16
Citations: 129 S.W.3d 441
Docket Number: No. ED 83170
Parties: Alfred A. BERVING and Cyrilla Berving d/b/a Rockport, Inc. and Rockport, Inc., Respondents, v. Rita PATRICK and R & R Company and R & R Company, d/b/a R & R Sign Company, Appellants.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., and MARY R. RUSSELL, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 129
Pages: 441–442

Head Matter:
Alfred A. BERVING and Cyrilla Berving d/b/a Rockport, Inc. and Rockport, Inc., Respondents, v. Rita PATRICK and R & R Company and R & R Company, d/b/a R & R Sign Company, Appellants.
No. ED 83170.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
March 16, 2004.
Ted F. Frapolli, Cynthia Garnholz, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Merle L. Silverstein, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., and MARY R. RUSSELL, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
R & R Company and R & R Company d/b/a R & R Sign Company and Rita Patrick (collective!y, "Sellers") appeal from the judgments on remand of two divisions of Circuit Court of St. Louis County. The equity and at-law divisions issued judgments following our mandate in the underlying appeal, Berving v. R & R, 70 S.W.3d 10 (Mo.App.2002) ("Berving J"). Sellers allege that the equity and at-law divisions failed to award attorney's fees on remand for the equity portion of the case and that our holding in Berving I adopted a misstatement of fact which tainted our mandate and the judgments on remand. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error. The judgments of the trial courts are affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Both parties' motions for attorney's fees on this appeal are denied.