Case Name: Garry SANDERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John ELUWA; Wake County Public Defender, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-12-22
Citations: 627 F. App'x 201
Docket Number: No. 15-7686
Parties: Garry SANDERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John ELUWA; Wake County Public Defender, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 627
Pages: 201–202

Head Matter:
Garry SANDERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John ELUWA; Wake County Public Defender, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15-7686.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 17, 2015.
Decided: Dec. 22, 2015.
Garry Sanders, Appellant Pro Se.
Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Garry Sanders appeals the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation and dismissing Sanders' complaint for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to the Rooker-Feldmam doctrine. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Sanders' informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, Sanders has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
D.C. Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 103 S.Ct. 1303, 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983); Rooker v. Fid. Tr. Co., 263 U.S. 413, 44 S.Ct. 149, 68 L.Ed. 362 (1923).