Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Harry Irizarry, Also Known as Harry Rosario, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1987-07-16
Citations: 132 A.D.2d 478
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Harry Irizarry, Also Known as Harry Rosario, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 132
Pages: 478–478

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Harry Irizarry, Also Known as Harry Rosario, Appellant.

Opinion:
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Fred W. Eggert, J.), rendered January 11, 1984, which, after a bench trial, convicted defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and sentenced him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of from 6 to 12 years, is held in abeyance, with new counsel to be assigned for defendant and present counsel now relieved (People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833).
Defendant's counsel, in purported compliance with Anders v California (386 US 738, reh denied 388 US 924) and People v Saunders (supra), has submitted a brief urging that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Defendant has responded by submitting a pro se brief on his own behalf, arguing that the People failed to disprove his agency defense in this narcotics sale transaction beyond a reasonable doubt. We find the merit of this contention sufficiently colorable to warrant its presentation by "an active advocate in behalf of his client" (Anders v California, supra, at 744) and direct that the appeal go forward accordingly (see, People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Concur—Sandler, J. P., Carro, Kassal, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.