Case Name: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. THOMAS SERLINSKY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1935-10-09
Citations: 115 N.J.L. 560
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. THOMAS SERLINSKY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 115
Pages: 560–562

Head Matter:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. THOMAS SERLINSKY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Argued May 27, 1935
Decided October 9, 1935.
For the plaintiff in error, Joseph Grossman and Merritt Lane.
For the defendant in error, James D. Carpenter.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bodi'ne in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.