Case Name: Patricia E. GENTALA and Robert A. Gentala, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees, v. The CITY OF TUCSON, Defendant-Appellee- Cross-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-01-08
Citations: 275 F.3d 1160
Docket Number: Nos. 97-17062, 97-17069; D.C. No. CV-97-00327-FRZ
Parties: Patricia E. GENTALA and Robert A. Gentala, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees, v. The CITY OF TUCSON, Defendant-Appellee- Cross-Appellant.
Judges: Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, FERNANDEZ, T.G. NELSON, Kleinfeld, SILVERMAN, GRABER, McKEOWN, WARDLAW, W. FLETCHER, GOULD, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 275
Pages: 1160–1160

Head Matter:
Patricia E. GENTALA and Robert A. Gentala, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees, v. The CITY OF TUCSON, Defendant-Appellee- Cross-Appellant.
Nos. 97-17062, 97-17069.
D.C. No. CV-97-00327-FRZ
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Filed Jan. 8, 2002
Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, FERNANDEZ, T.G. NELSON, Kleinfeld, SILVERMAN, GRABER, McKEOWN, WARDLAW, W. FLETCHER, GOULD, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
The motion for further briefing and oral argument is DENIED.
This case is before us on remand from the United States Supreme Court. Gentala v. City of Tucson, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 340, 151 L.Ed.2d 256 (2001). We remand to the district court for reconsideration in light of Good News Club v. Milford Central School, 533 U.S. 98, 121 S.Ct. 2093, 150 L.Ed.2d 151 (2000), including such evidentiary proceedings as may be appropriate.
Judge Fernandez dissents.