Case Name: Teresa CRAWFORD and William M. Blynn, Appellants, v. DIVISION OF RETIREMENT, DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION and the Retirement Commission of the State of Florida, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1979-04-19
Citations: 369 So. 2d 689
Docket Number: No. LL-59
Parties: Teresa CRAWFORD and William M. Blynn, Appellants, v. DIVISION OF RETIREMENT, DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION and the Retirement Commission of the State of Florida, Appellees.
Judges: McCORD, C. J., and LARRY G. SMITH, and BOOTH, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 369
Pages: 689–689

Head Matter:
Teresa CRAWFORD and William M. Blynn, Appellants, v. DIVISION OF RETIREMENT, DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION and the Retirement Commission of the State of Florida, Appellees.
No. LL-59.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
April 19, 1979.
Karl J. Leib, Jr. of Leib & Popper, P.A., Miami, for appellants.
Stephen S. Mathues, Tallahassee, for the Division of Retirement, appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Upon a thorough consideration of the record and briefs, we find appellants' attack on the constitutionality of Section 121.021(15), Florida Statutes (1977) to be without merit. See Department of Administration v. Brown, 334 So.2d 355 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976), cert. denied 344 So.2d 323 (Fla.1977); Shields v. Division of Retirement, 352 So.2d 1239 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977), cert. discharged and appeal dismissed, 368 So.2d 590 (Fla. 1978) (rehearing denied); Dempsey v. State Retirement Commission, 354 So.2d 913 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978), cert. denied 360 So.2d 1248 (Fla.1978). Similarly under the same authorities, the challenge to Rule 22B-1.05 is without merit.
Accordingly, the order denying appellants' special risk membership is affirmed.
McCORD, C. J., and LARRY G. SMITH, and BOOTH, JJ., concur.