Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jonathon Marc SUTTER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-08-25
Citations: 348 F.3d 789
Docket Number: No. 02-50282
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jonathon Marc SUTTER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 348
Pages: 789–789

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jonathon Marc SUTTER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-50282.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted May 16, 2003.
Filed Aug. 25, 2003.
Amended Nov. 4, 2003.
Ross E. Viselman, San Diego, CA, for the defendant-appellant.
Roger W. Haines, Jr., and Francisco J. Sanchez, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Criminal Division, San Diego, CA for the plaintiff-appellee.
Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
The Opinion filed on August 25, 2003 [340 F.3d 1022], is amended as follows:
1) At slip op., p. 11983, paragraph 3, 2d line [340 F.3d at 1027], change "Sutter's indictment on September 18, 2001" to "Sutter's arraignment on September 18, 2001."
2) At slip op., p. 11983, paragraph 3, line 5 [340 F.3d at 1027], change "October 22, 2002" to "October 22, 2001."
3) At slip op., p. 11992, paragraph 11, line 7 [340 F.3d at 1032], add the words "of the discovery dispute" after "settlement" and before the closing parenthetical.
With these amendments, the panel has unanimously voted to deny appellant's petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc.
The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 85.
The petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED.