Case Name: Arpin v. Consol. Rail Co.
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2017-02-23
Citations: 148 Ohio St. 3d 1414
Docket Number: 2017-0171
Parties: Arpin v. Consol. Rail Co.
Judges: 
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 148
Pages: 1414–1414

Head Matter:
2017-0171.
Arpin v. Consol. Rail Co.

Opinion:
Cuyahoga App. No. 104279, 2016-Ohio-8313. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal.
Upon consideration of the motion for admission pro hac vice of Dan Himmelfarb, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. XII(4), counsel shall file a notice of permission to appear pro hac vice with the Supreme Court's Office of Attorney Services within 30 days of the date of this entry.