Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Terrance HOWARD, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-06-22
Citations: 135 F. App'x 736
Docket Number: No. 04-30973
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Terrance HOWARD, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 135
Pages: 736–737

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Terrance HOWARD, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 04-30973.
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Decided June 22, 2005.
Richard R. Pickens, II, U.S. Attorney’s Office, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Edwin Wayne Walker, Gretna, LA, Defendant-Appellant.
Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Terrance Howard on appeal has filed a motion for leave to withdraw and a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Howard has filed a response.
Because neither Howard nor his attorney filed any pleading evincing an intent to appeal within the period prescribed in Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(4), the district court was without authority to extend the time for filing an appeal. See United States v. Awalt, 728 F.2d 704, 705 (5th Cir.1984). Therefore, we lack jurisdiction to consider Howard's appeal. See id. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.