Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mitchell Kent JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-02-02
Citations: 412 F. App'x 223
Docket Number: No. 09-15831
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mitchell Kent JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before EDMONDSON, MARCUS and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 412
Pages: 223–224

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mitchell Kent JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-15831
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Feb. 2, 2011.
Robert A. Ratliff, Robert A. Ratliff, P.C., Mobile, AL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Steven E. Butler, Mobile, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Before EDMONDSON, MARCUS and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Robert Ratliff, appointed counsel for Mitchell Kent Jackson, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Jackson's convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.