Case Name: Gabriel SANCHEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE); Michael J. Garcia, Assistant Secretary for ICE; Michael Chertoff, Secretary for Department of Homeland Security (DHS); Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-02-13
Citations: 220 F. App'x 650
Docket Number: No. 05-56665
Parties: Gabriel SANCHEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE); Michael J. Garcia, Assistant Secretary for ICE; Michael Chertoff, Secretary for Department of Homeland Security (DHS); Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: Before: MCKAY, KOZINSKI and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 220
Pages: 650–651

Head Matter:
Gabriel SANCHEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE); Michael J. Garcia, Assistant Secretary for ICE; Michael Chertoff, Secretary for Department of Homeland Security (DHS); Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 05-56665.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 5, 2007.
Filed Feb. 13, 2007.
Alejandro Garcia, Esq., City of Commerce, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.
Erika Johnson-Brooks, Esq., Jason K. Axe, Esq., Los Angeles, CA, for Respondents-Appellees.
Before: MCKAY, KOZINSKI and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
This panel grants appellant’s unopposed motion to submit without oral argument.
The Honorable Monroe G. McKay, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Appellant's argument that the REAL ID Act's repeal of habeas jurisdiction over final removal orders violates the Suspension Clause, is foreclosed by Puri v. Gonzales, 464 F.3d 1038, 1041-42 (9th Cir.2006). The district court thus did not err in dismissing the petition for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.