Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Ronell JOHNSON, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2015-08-11
Citations: 471 S.W.3d 775
Docket Number: No. ED 102788
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Ronell JOHNSON, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J. and Angela T. Quigless, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 471
Pages: 775–775

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Ronell JOHNSON, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 102788
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Filed: August 11, 2015
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied October 8, 2015
Kevin L. Schriener, 141 .North Meramec Avenue, Suite 314, Clayton, Missouri 63105, for Appellant.
Alexandra E. Wilson-Schoone, 100 South Central Avenue, Second Floor, St. Louis, Missouri 63105, for Respondent.
Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J. and Angela T. Quigless, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Ronell-Johnson (Defendant) appeals the St. Louis Circuit Court's judgment convicting him of failure to drive within a single lape, § 304.015, RSMo Supp. 2010, and failure to yield to an emergency vehicle, § 304.022, RSMo Supp. 2012. Defendant raises two claims, of insufficient evidence, claiming. that the State failed to adduce evidence that (1) he made an unsafe lane change in violation of § 304.015 and (2) that the officer's car was equipped with the required lights or sirens as required by§ 304.022. Weaffirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and have determined that an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. Rule 30.25(b).