Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dundrielle Lefrank BLAKENEY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-10-21
Citations: 333 F. App'x 745
Docket Number: No. 09-7161
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Dundrielle Lefrank BLAKENEY, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 333
Pages: 745–745

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Dundrielle Lefrank BLAKENEY, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 09-7161.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 15, 2009.
Decided: Oct. 21, 2009.
Reita Pauline Pendry, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Dundrielle Lefrank Blakeney appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a reduced sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Blakeney, No. 3:02-cr-00140-GCM-1 (W.D.N.C. June 9, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.