Case Name: CARMICHAEL v. FIRST FARMERS BANK et al.
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1919-10-10
Citations: 24 Ga. App. 250
Docket Number: 10320
Parties: CARMICHAEL v. FIRST FARMERS BANK et al.
Judges: Broyles, C. J., and Lulce, J., concur.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 24
Pages: 250–251

Head Matter:
10320.
CARMICHAEL v. FIRST FARMERS BANK et al.
1. Service of the bill of exceptions being waived in accordance with the Civil Code (1910), § 6160 (3), the motion to dismiss the writ of error is denied.
2. It was too late to object to the intervention and to move to strike the intervenor as a party at a term of the court subsequent to the term at which, under an order of the court, the intervenor was made a party defendant and its pleadings were filed.
3. It was not error to direct a verdict for the defendant, where, under the pleadings and the evidence, no other legal verdict could have been rendered.
Decided October 10, 1919.
Trover; from Butts superior court—Judge Searcy. January 11, 1919.
W. E'. Watkins, for plaintiff.
Little, Powell, Smith & Goldstein, H. M. Fletcher, for defendants.

Opinion:
Bloodworth, J.
The provisions of the Civil Code (1910), § .6160, par. 3, as to waiver of service of a copy of the bill of exceptions, were complied with, and the motion to dismiss the bill of exceptions is denied.
J. B. Carmichael brought an action of bail-trover against the First Farmers Bank to the August term, 1916, of the superior court. The Chippewa Bank filed an intervention, and prayed that it be made a party defendant. On August 31, 1916, the following order was passed: "It is ordered by the court that the Chippewa Bank be made a party defendant to above-stated suit, and that this its answer be filed as a part of the pleadings and record in said case." At the February term, 1917, the plaintiff filed objection to the intervention, and moved to strike the intervenor as a party. This motion came too late and was properly overruled. Pettis v. Campbell, 47 Ga. 596; Life Association of America v. Ferrill, 60 Ga. 414 (2); Ansley v. Jordan, 61 Ga. 484 (7), 488 (7).
Under the pleadings and the evidence no other verdict than one in favor of the defendant could have beendegally returned, and the court did not err in so directing.
Judgment affirmed.
Broyles, C. J., and Lulce, J., concur.