Case Name: Haggart v. California Borough, Appellant
Court: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1902-10-13
Citations: 21 Pa. Super. 210
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 2
Parties: Haggart v. California Borough, Appellant.
Judges: Before Rice, P. J., Beaver, Ob-lady, W. W. Porter and W. D. Porter, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania Superior Court Reports
Volume: 21
Pages: 210–210

Head Matter:
Haggart v. California Borough, Appellant.
Argued April 22, 1902.
October 13, 1902:
Appeal, No. 2, April T., 1902, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Washington Co., Aug. T., 1900, No. 125, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Mary E. Haggart v. California Borough.
Before Rice, P. J., Beaver, Ob-lady, W. W. Porter and W. D. Porter, JJ.
Affirmed.

Opinion:
Opinion by
W. D. Porter, J.,
All the questions raised by this record were presented in the ease of Roth well et al. v. California Borough, post, p. 234, and have been considered in that opinion. If the plaintiff shall within twenty days file a stipulation reducing tbe judgment nunc pro tunc, as of March 16, 1901, to $500, the judgment will be affirmed.