Case Name: Brassard v. Stoner et al.
Court: Appellate Court of Indiana
Jurisdiction: Indiana
Decision Date: 1925-11-25
Citations: 83 Ind. App. 737
Docket Number: No. 12,089
Parties: Brassard v. Stoner et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Indiana Court of Appeals Reports
Volume: 83
Pages: 737–738

Head Matter:
Brassard v. Stoner et al.
[No. 12,089.
Filed November 25, 1925.]
John A. Dunlap, M. E. Graves and T. B. Cunningham, for appellant.
James C. Murphy and Hanley & Hanley, for appellees.

Opinion:
Remy, C. J.
Proceeding supplementary to execution by appellant against appellees; from a judgment for appellees, this appeal is prosecuted. The only question for consideration by this court is the sufficiency of the evidence. There is competent evidence to sustain the decision.
After the trial court had overruled the motion for a new trial in this cause, at a, subsequent term of court, and more than thirty days after the judgment had been rendered, appellant instituted an independent proceeding for new trial, which resulted in a judgment for appellees. From that judgment there was an appeal to this court. See, Brassard v. Stoner (1925), ante 655, 149 N. E. 646.
Affirmed.