Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dennard HUTCHINSON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-08-21
Citations: 538 F. App'x 282
Docket Number: No. 13-6150
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dennard HUTCHINSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 538
Pages: 282–282

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dennard HUTCHINSON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-6150.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 12, 2013.
Decided: Aug. 21, 2013.
Dennard Hutchinson, Appellant Pro Se. Roderick Charles Young, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Dennard Hutchinson appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a reduction in his sentence based on Amendment 750 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (2011). We have reviewed the record and hold the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the relief Hutchinson sought. See United States v. Munn, 595 F.3d 183, 186 (4th Cir.2010) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Hutchinson, No. 3:03-cr-00145-HEH-l (E.D.Va. Jan. 16, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.