Case Name: Moses Rosen, Appellant, v. Max Brodskey, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1899-03
Citations: 26 Misc. 816
Docket Number: 
Parties: Moses Rosen, Appellant, v. Max Brodskey, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 26
Pages: 816–816

Head Matter:
Moses Rosen, Appellant, v. Max Brodskey, Respondent.
Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the fourth district, borough of Manhattan, in favor of defendant.
Fluegelman & Bach, for appellant.
Friend, House & Grossman, for respondent.

Opinion:
Freedman, P. J.
The complaint in this action was for a conversion and the answer a general denial. The case contains conflicting evidence and seems to have been tried by both parties more in the nature of an accounting than otherwise, but the judgment for the defendant is clearly right, because no recovery upon a cause of action founded upon contract could be had under the pleadings and the testimony wholly failed to establish conversion.
Judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
MaoLean and Leventeitt, JJ., concur.'
Judgment affirmed, with costs.