Case Name: STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Chuck ADDERLY, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-04-01
Citations: 602 So. 2d 556
Docket Number: No. 91-1295
Parties: STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Chuck ADDERLY, Appellee.
Judges: DELL, GARRETT and FARMER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 602
Pages: 556–557

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Chuck ADDERLY, Appellee.
No. 91-1295.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
April 1, 1992.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Don M. Rogers, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Anthony Calvello, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND/OR REQUEST TO CERTIFY QUESTION OF GREAT PUBLIC IMPORTANCE
PER CURIAM.
We deny appellee's motion for rehearing, but grant his motion to certify a question of great public importance. Accordingly, as this court did in State v. Scates, 585 So.2d 385 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), we certify the following question to be of great public importance:
MAY A TRIAL COURT PROPERLY DEPART FROM THE MINIMUM MANDATORY PROVISIONS OF SECTION 893.13(l)(e), FLORIDA STATUTES (1989), UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF SECTION 397.12, FLORIDA STATUTES (1989)?
DELL, GARRETT and FARMER, JJ., concur.