Case Name: DAVID WILENSKY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. GEORGIA CASUALTY COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1926-01-28
Citations: 4 N.J. Misc. 95
Docket Number: 
Parties: DAVID WILENSKY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. GEORGIA CASUALTY COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 4
Pages: 95–96

Head Matter:
DAVID WILENSKY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. GEORGIA CASUALTY COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Submitted October term, 1925
Decided January 28, 1926.
Before Justices Parker, Minturíst and Black.
Por the appellant, Frank G. Turner.
Por the respondent, George Wenger.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in the Paterson District Court for $108.60, on July 14th, 1925.
The suit was brought under a policy of accident insurance dated November 17th, 1921, covering the period from November 17th, 1921, to November 17th, 1922, insuring the plaintiff for claims for damages for bodily injury sustained by accident.
The plaintiff claims that Michael Poster, on November 14th, 1922, was injured while riding in his automobile. Michael Poster obtained a judgment against the plaintiff on October 2d, 1924, for $5,000. Plaintiff paid Michael Poster, on December loth, 1924, the sum of $100 on account of the judgment. This is the sum sued for in this suit. Michael Poster obtained judgment against the plaintiff on October 2d, 1924, hut the present suit was not commenced until March 6th, 1925—that is, about one hundred and fifty-four days elapsed between the judgment obtained against the plaintiff by Michael Poster and the time in which the plaintiff brought suit against the insurance company.
The policy of insurance provides (Case, p. 68) that suit must be started against the insurance company within ninety, days from the date of such judgment.
Por this reason we think the judgment of the Paterson District Court must be reversed, and such will be the order of the court.