Case Name: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al. v. SPRING VALLEY WATER CO.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1913-05-05
Citations: 204 F. 1006
Docket Number: No. 2,176
Parties: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al. v. SPRING VALLEY WATER CO.
Judges: Before GILBERT, ROSS, and MORROW, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter
Volume: 204
Pages: 1006–1006

Head Matter:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al. v. SPRING VALLEY WATER CO.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 5, 1913.)
No. 2,176.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Second Division of the Northern District of California; William O. Van Fleet, Judge.
Percy V. Long, City Atty., and Thos. E. Haven, Asst. City Atty., both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellants.
John W. Shenk, City Atty., and George E. Cryer, Asst. City Atty., both of Los Angeles, Cal., amici eurise.
Edward J. McCutehen, A. Crawford Greene, and Page, McCutchen, Knight & Olney, all of San Francisco, Cal., for. appellee.
Before GILBERT, ROSS, and MORROW, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
On the authority of the decisimi of the Supreme Court in. the case of Home Telephone & Telegraph Company v. City of Los Angeles et al., 227 U. S. 278, 33 Sup. Ct. 312, 57 L. Ed. -, October term, 1912, the judgment is affirmed.