Case Name: The City of Zanesville, Appellant, v. Rouse, Appellee
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2010-08-17
Citations: 126 Ohio St. 3d 1227
Docket Number: No. 2009-1282
Parties: The City of Zanesville, Appellant, v. Rouse, Appellee.
Judges: Brown, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 126
Pages: 1227–1227

Head Matter:
The City of Zanesville, Appellant, v. Rouse, Appellee.
[Cite as Zanesville v. Rouse, 126 Ohio St.3d 1227, 2010-Ohio-3754.]
(No. 2009-1282
— Submitted August 10, 2010
— Decided August 17, 2010.)
Scott T. Hillis, Zanesville Law Director, and Susan E. Small, Assistant Law Director, for appellant.
Elizabeth N. Gaba and David T. Spencer, for appellee.

Opinion:
{¶ 1} On May 26, 2010, the court reversed the judgment of the court of appeals in this case and reinstated the judgment of the trial court. Zanesville v. Rouse, 126 Ohio St.3d 1, 2010-Ohio-2218, 929 N.E.2d 1044.
{¶ 2} Appellee filed a motion for reconsideration, arguing in part that the court of appeals did not consider several assignments of error raised by appellee.
{¶ 3} The motion for reconsideration is granted to the following extent: The portion of the court's May 26, 2010 judgment reinstating the judgment of the trial court is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for consideration of appellee's assignments of error held to be moot below.
Brown, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Pfeifer, J., dissents.