Case Name: Danney R. LAND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-10-17
Citations: 78 F. App'x 607
Docket Number: No. 03-15878; D.C. No. CV-02-01064-PMP/PAL
Parties: Danney R. LAND, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before WARDLAW, BERZON and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 78
Pages: 607–608

Head Matter:
Danney R. LAND, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 03-15878.
D.C. No. CV-02-01064-PMP/PAL.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 14, 2003.
Decided Oct. 17, 2003.
Danney R. Land, #88, Boulder City, NV, pro se.
Richard A. Latterell, Esq., U.S. Department Of Justice, Steven W. Parks, Esq., David I. Pincus, Esq., DOJ-U.S. Department Of Ustice, Washington, DC, Daniel G. Bogden, Esq., USLV-Office Of The U.S. Attorney, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before WARDLAW, BERZON and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Danney R. Land appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of the United States in Land's action eontest ing the Internal Revenue Service's levy to collect penalties assessed against him under 26 U.S.C. § 6702 for filing frivolous income tax returns.
The district court correctly determined that Land failed to raise a genuine issue as to any material fact, that he was liable for the penalties assessed against him, Hudson v. United States, 766 F.2d 1288, 1291 (9th Cir.1985), and that the Internal Revenue Service Appeals Office properly relied upon the Forms 4340 to determine that all requirements to proceed with a levy had been satisfied, Hansen v. United States, 7 F.3d 137, 138 (9th Cir.1993). Land's remaining arguments lack merit. Accordingly, the district court correctly granted the United States' summary judgment motion.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.