Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Kamelita Mathura, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2016-04-13
Citations: 138 A.D.3d 888
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kamelita Mathura, Appellant.
Judges: Mastro, J.P., Dillon, Hinds-Radix and Maltese, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 138
Pages: 888–888

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kamelita Mathura, Appellant.
[28 NYS3d 326]

Opinion:
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hollie, J.), rendered December 20, 2013, convicting her of burglary in the second degree, possession of burglar's tools, and criminal mischief in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt of each crime beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]; People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342 [2007]), we nevertheless accord great deference to the jury's opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor (see People v Mateo, 2 NY3d 383, 410 [2004]; People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt on each count was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]).
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.
Mastro, J.P., Dillon, Hinds-Radix and Maltese, JJ., concur.