Case Name: Marilin LARKEN and Marcelo Larken, Appellants, v. BARNETT BANK OF SOUTH FLORIDA, N.A., etc., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-05-28
Citations: 579 So. 2d 891
Docket Number: No. 90-1571
Parties: Marilin LARKEN and Marcelo Larken, Appellants, v. BARNETT BANK OF SOUTH FLORIDA, N.A., etc., Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and NESBITT, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 579
Pages: 891–891

Head Matter:
Marilin LARKEN and Marcelo Larken, Appellants, v. BARNETT BANK OF SOUTH FLORIDA, N.A., etc., Appellee.
No. 90-1571.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 28, 1991.
Marilin Larken and Marcelo Larken, in pro. per.
Kris E. Penzell, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and NESBITT, JJ.

Opinion:
CORRECTED OPINION
PER CURIAM.
The Larkens appeal from a final summary judgment in an action for default on a promissory note.
We affirm the order of final summary judgment. See Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966). However, we reverse that portion of the order awarding attorneys' fees to the appellee and remand to the trial court with directions to comply with the requirements of Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1985).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with directions.