Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Noel BROWN, Appellant; UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Sylvester RILEY, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1970-09-09
Citations: 429 F.2d 983
Docket Number: Nos. 25618, 25643
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Noel BROWN, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Sylvester RILEY, Appellant.
Judges: Before CHAMBERS and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and PECKHAM, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 429
Pages: 983–983

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Noel BROWN, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Sylvester RILEY, Appellant.
Nos. 25618, 25643.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Sept. 9, 1970.
Carl E. Stewart, Los Angeles, Cal., for Brown.
Joseph T. Vodnoy, Los Angeles, Cal., for Riley.
Robert L. Meyer, U. S. Atty., David R. Nissen, Chief, Criminal Division, Brian J. O’Neill, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and PECKHAM, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The judgments of conviction are affirmed.
We find no illegally "seized" evidence as a matter of law, no illegal search under the circumstances, and find adequate evidence to support the verdict.
On the first contention the court accepts United States v. Polansky, 418 F.2d 444 (2d Cir., 1969); United States v. Tropiano, 418 F.2d 1069 (2d Cir., 1969); Doty v. United States, 416 F.2d 887 (10th Cir., 1968); and Dryden v. United States, 391 F.2d 214 (5th Cir., 1968).