Case Name: Peggy FRANTZ, Appellant, v. DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2013-04-02
Citations: 398 S.W.3d 55
Docket Number: No. WD 75195
Parties: Peggy FRANTZ, Appellant, v. DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Respondent.
Judges: Before Division Three: CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Presiding Judge, JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge and GARY D. WITT, Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 398
Pages: 55–56

Head Matter:
Peggy FRANTZ, Appellant, v. DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Respondent.
No. WD 75195.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
April 2, 2013.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 30, 2013.
Craig D. Hines, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
Larry R. Ruhmann, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before Division Three: CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Presiding Judge, JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge and GARY D. WITT, Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Peggy Frantz appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying unemployment benefits • on the basis that her termination was due to misconduct connected with work. Frantz claims the decision should be reversed because: (1) employer did not meet its burden of proof and the record does not establish by a preponderance of the evidence that Frantz's actions constituted misconduct; (2) the Commission's findings of fact and witness credibility determinations were procured through fraud by Employer's witness; (3) the hearing and the resultant denial of benefits violated Frantz's rights to procedural and substantive due process, and to the equal protection of the law; and (4) the Commission erred in its legal conclusion that Frantz's actions constituted misconduct in that the record does not establish culpable misconduct. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).