Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Michael D. RHODES, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-12-16
Citations: 587 F. App'x 846
Docket Number: No. 14-10245
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Michael D. RHODES, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 587
Pages: 846–847

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Michael D. RHODES, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 14-10245
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 16, 2014.
James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Jennifer Tourje, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Jerry Van Beard, Esq., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Sam L. Ogan, Esq., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before KING, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Michael D. Rhodes has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Rhodes has not filed a response. We have reviewed coun sel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th CiR. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.