Case Name: HILLIARD v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1911-11-15
Citations: 141 S.W. 90
Docket Number: 
Parties: HILLIARD v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 141
Pages: 90–90

Head Matter:
HILLIARD v. STATE.
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Nov. 15, 1911.)
Okimi^al Law (§ 1097*) — Review—Failure to File Statement oe Facts.
On review of a conviction, the court can determine neither the question as to whether the verdict is contrary to law and the evidence, nor whether there is a variance between the indictment and the evidence, where there is no statement of facts .in the record.
[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2862, 2864, 2926-2947; Dec. Dig. § 1097.*]
Appeal from District Court, Travis County; George Calhoun, Judge.
Will Hilliard was convicted of burglary, and appeals.
Affirmed.
C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Opinion:
DAVIDSON, P. J.
Appellant was convicted of burglary; his punishment being assessed at five years' confinement in the penitentiary.
Appellant sets forth in his motion for new trial several reasons why the judgment should be reversed. The first is that the verdict of the jury is contrary to the law and the evidence; second, that there is a material variance between the allegations in the indictment and the evidence adduced upon the trial, in this: That said indictment charges the burglary to have been committed by entering a house, and does not allege the house to be a private residence, whereas, the testimony developed the fact and was positive that said house was a private residence, hence the proof was of a separate and distinct offense than that alleged. Both grounds would be serious, if true; but we are unable to decide the matter, because the record does not contain a statement of facts.
Finding no reversible error in the record as presented, the judgment is affirmed.