Case Name: Reyes VISCIOSO, Appellant, v. David MANZ, an individual, David Manz, P.A., and Greenman & Manz, P.A., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-04-26
Citations: 756 So. 2d 238
Docket Number: No. 3D99-2082
Parties: Reyes VISCIOSO, Appellant, v. David MANZ, an individual, David Manz, P.A., and Greenman & Manz, P.A., Appellees.
Judges: Before GERSTEN, GODERICH and SHEVIN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 756
Pages: 238–239

Head Matter:
Reyes VISCIOSO, Appellant, v. David MANZ, an individual, David Manz, P.A., and Greenman & Manz, P.A., Appellees.
No. 3D99-2082.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 26, 2000.
Jeffrey A. Norkin ■ and Jonathan M. Drucker, Miami, for appellant.
Josephs, Jack & Gaebe and Scott A. Cole, Miami, for appellees.
Before GERSTEN, GODERICH and SHEVIN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Zeidwig v. Ward, 548 So.2d 209 (Fla.1989)(where court determined . that criminal defendant received effective assistance of counsel,, defendant/attorney in subsequent civil malprac tice action may defensively assert collateral estoppel); State v. Viscioso, 709 So.2d 650 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)(affirming on appeal and cross appeal order granting Rule 3.850 relief); Johnson v. Raban, 702 S.W.2d 134, 138 (Mo.App.E.D.1985)(effective administration of justice would be undermined if prior decision on same issue is ignored).