Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. David RAMOS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-08-17
Citations: 390 F. App'x 425
Docket Number: No. 09-10918
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. David RAMOS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before DAVIS, SMITH, and WIENER, ' Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 390
Pages: 425–426

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. David RAMOS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-10918
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 17, 2010.
Nancy E. Larson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, James Michael Worley, Sr., Esq., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Fort Worth, TX, for Plaintiff-Ap-pellee.
Lynn Marie Smith, The Smith Law Firm PC, Newark, TX, for Defendant Appellant.
Before DAVIS, SMITH, and WIENER, ' Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent David Ramos has moved for leave to with draw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Ramos has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel's brief, and Ramos's response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Ramos's untimely request for appointment of new counsel on appeal is DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir.1998).
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.