Case Name: Robert L. COMEGYS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. J. Michael STOUFFER, Warden, Maryland Correctional Training Center; Attorney General of the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-09-10
Citations: 45 F. App'x 299
Docket Number: No. 02-6889
Parties: Robert L. COMEGYS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. J. Michael STOUFFER, Warden, Maryland Correctional Training Center; Attorney General of the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 45
Pages: 299–299

Head Matter:
Robert L. COMEGYS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. J. Michael STOUFFER, Warden, Maryland Correctional Training Center; Attorney General of the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 02-6889.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 5, 2002.
Decided Sept. 10, 2002.
Robert L. Comegys, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Robert L. Comegys seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and conclude on the reasoning of the district court that Comegys has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Comegys v. Stouffer, No. CA-02-9480-DKC (D. Md. filed May 3, 2002; entered May 6, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabihty and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.