Case Name: Ethel Fein, Plaintiff, v. Donald J. Bonetti, One of the Partners Doing Business under the Name of Marietta Beauty Salon, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, et al., Defendants. Regal Beauty Supply Company, Inc., et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellants
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1954-06-03
Citations: 307 N.Y. 682
Docket Number: 
Parties: Ethel Fein, Plaintiff, v. Donald J. Bonetti, One of the Partners Doing Business under the Name of Marietta Beauty Salon, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, et al., Defendants. Regal Beauty Supply Company, Inc., et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 307
Pages: 682–683

Head Matter:
Ethel Fein, Plaintiff, v. Donald J. Bonetti, One of the Partners Doing Business under the Name of Marietta Beauty Salon, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, et al., Defendants. Regal Beauty Supply Company, Inc., et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellants.
Argued April 8, 1954;
decided June 3, 1954.
Ralph Stout and William J. Hayes for appellants.
John W. Trapp for respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment of Appellate Division and that of Trial Term reversed, with costs in all courts, and cross complaint dismissed upon the ground that there was no evidence that the dye in question contained any inherently dangerous or poisonous ingredients (see Karr v. Inecto, Inc., 247 N. Y. 360). No opinion.
Concur: Lewis, Ch. J., Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fuld, Froessel and Van Voorhis, JJ.