Case Name: Ellis v. The State of Ohio et al.
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1953-01-28
Citations: 158 Ohio St. 489
Docket Number: No. 33232
Parties: Ellis v. The State of Ohio et al.
Judges: Weygandt, C. J., Middleton, Taft, Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman and Stewart, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, New Service
Volume: 158
Pages: 489–490

Head Matter:
Ellis v. The State of Ohio et al.
(No. 33232
Decided January 28, 1953.)
Mr. John Francis, for petitioner.
Mr. C. William O’Neill, attorney general, and Mr. Larry B. Snyder, for respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Petitioner had an adequate remedy by way of appeal from the judgment of conviction to review the alleged errors of which he complains, and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in habeas corpus. In re Whitmore, 137 Ohio St., 313, 29 N. E. (2d), 363; In re Burson, 152 Ohio St., 375, 89 N. E. (2d), 651; In re Pullins, 155 Ohio St., 171, 98 N. E. (2d), 11 In re Ames, 155 Ohio St., 184, 98 N. E. (2d), 2; In re Stewart, 156 Ohio St., 521, 103 N. E. (2d), 551.
Petitioner remanded to custody.
Weygandt, C. J., Middleton, Taft, Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman and Stewart, JJ., concur.