Case Name: IN RE William Steven PALEOS. A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, Bar Registration No. 358580, 2017 DDN 238
Court: District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Decision Date: 2018-02-01
Citations: 177 A.3d 1245
Docket Number: No. 17-BG-1258
Parties: IN RE William Steven PALEOS A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, Bar Registration No. 358580, 2017 DDN 238
Judges: BEFORE: Beckwith, Associate Judge,' and Washington and Farrell, Senior Judges.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 177
Pages: 1245–1245

Head Matter:
IN RE William Steven PALEOS A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, Bar Registration No. 358580, 2017 DDN 238
No. 17-BG-1258
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
(FILED-February 1, 2018)
BEFORE: Beckwith, Associate Judge,' and Washington and Farrell, Senior Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
On consideration of. the certified order changing respondent's status to practice law in the state of Maryland to inactive by consent, this court's December 5, 2017, order suspending respondent and directing him to show cause why he should not be indefinitely suspended pursuant to a disability suspension under D.C. Bar R. XI § 13 as reciprocal discipline, the statement of Disciplinary Counsel wherein he states that respondent notified him that he did not oppose the imposition of reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent did not file a response to this court's order but did file his D.C. Bar R. XI § 14 (g) affidavit on January 2,2018,- it is
ORDERED that William Steven Paleos is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI § 13 nunc pro tunc to January 2,2018. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that respondent's attention is directed to the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI § 13 (g) for reinstatement, as well as the provisions of Rule XI § 16 (b) dealing with the requirements for reinstatement.