Case Name: Benning vs. Barlow, et al.
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1885-10-14
Citations: 1 Ga. L. Rep. 3
Docket Number: 
Parties: Benning vs. Barlow, et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Georgia Law Reporter
Volume: 1
Pages: 3–4

Head Matter:
DECISIONS OF THE SUPPEME COUHT OF GEORGIA,
Rendered October 14, 1885.
Benning vs. Barlow, et al.
Trespass from Lumpkin. Practice in Superior Court. New Trial. (Before Judge Estes.)
[Blandford, J., being disqualified, did not preside in this case.]

Opinion:
Jackson, C. J.
It furnished no ground for any extraordinary motion for a new trial at a later term of Court, that,the case was tried near the clo-se of a terra, and counsel did not have time to perfect the motion for a m-w trial, where it appears that, after the trial, the Court drew juries and did other things usual at the heel of aterra; that the dis-. satisfied p'irf.y could have made a motion, and taken an order to perfect .it and file n brief of the evidence afterwards, but that this was neglected Without any sufficient excuse therefor, and that nothing was done until the next term of Court.
Wier Boyd ; M. G. Boyd, for plaintiff in error.
H. H. Perry; W. P. Price, for defendants.
Judgment affirmed