Case Name: Nippon Paper Industries Co., Ltd. v. United States; Cooksey v. Bowersox, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center; Naumov v. University of Pittsburgh; Tsipouras v. Meshbesher, Birrell & Dunlap, Ltd., et al.; Harris v. New Jersey, In re Clark, In re Clark, In re Clark, Polley v. United States; Borroto v. United States; Slagel v. Shell Petroleum, Inc., et al.; Jackson v. Johnson et al.; Strable v. South Carolina; Connelly v. Borough of Forest Hills, Pennsylvania; Mathis v. Ciambrone et al.; Carrasquillo v. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division; McKellip v. Sorrell, Anderson, Lehrman, Wanner & Thomas et al.; Erdman v. Grayson, Warden, In re Tyler et al., Cosgrove v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.; Swain v. Detroit Board of Education et al.; McDermott v. Kansas Associates, Inc.; Reidt v. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; Waletzki v. United States
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1998-02-23
Citations: 522 U.S. 1143
Docket Number: No. 96-1987; No. 96-8341; No. 97-39; No. 97-515; No. 97-588; No. 97-5242; No. 97-5243; No. 97-5244; No. 97-5282; No. 97-5351; No. 97-5621; No. 97-5841; No. 97-6000; No. 97-6070; No. 97-6117; No. 97-6136; No. 97-6278; No. 97-6306; No. 97-6372; No. 97-6415; No. 97-6620; No. 97-6738; No. 97-6832; No. 97-7035
Parties: Nippon Paper Industries Co., Ltd. v. United States, Cooksey v. Bowersox, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center, Naumov v. University of Pittsburgh, Tsipouras v. Meshbesher, Birrell & Dunlap, Ltd., et al., Harris v. New Jersey, In re Clark, In re Clark, In re Clark, Polley v. United States, Borroto v. United States, Slagel v. Shell Petroleum, Inc., et al., Jackson v. Johnson et al., Strable v. South Carolina, Connelly v. Borough of Forest Hills, Pennsylvania, Mathis v. Ciambrone et al., Carrasquillo v. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, McKellip v. Sorrell, Anderson, Lehrman, Wanner & Thomas et al., Erdman v. Grayson, Warden, In re Tyler et al., Cosgrove v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., Swain v. Detroit Board of Education et al., McDermott v. Kansas Associates, Inc., Reidt v. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Waletzki v. United States,
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 522
Pages: 1143–1144

Head Matter:
No. 96-1987.
No. 96-8341.
No. 97-39.
No. 97-515.
No. 97-588.
No. 97-5242.
No. 97-5243.
No. 97-5244.
No. 97-5282.
No. 97-5351.
No. 97-5621.
No. 97-5841.
No. 97-6000.
No. 97-6070.
No. 97-6117.
Nippon Paper Industries Co., Ltd. v. United States, Cooksey v. Bowersox, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center, Naumov v. University of Pittsburgh, Tsipouras v. Meshbesher, Birrell & Dunlap, Ltd., et al., Harris v. New Jersey, In re Clark, In re Clark, In re Clark, Polley v. United States, Borroto v. United States, Slagel v. Shell Petroleum, Inc., et al., Jackson v. Johnson et al., Strable v. South Carolina, Connelly v. Borough of Forest Hills, Pennsylvania, Mathis v. Ciambrone et al., Carrasquillo v. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, McKellip v. Sorrell, Anderson, Lehrman, Wanner & Thomas et al., Erdman v. Grayson, Warden, In re Tyler et al., Cosgrove v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., Swain v. Detroit Board of Education et al., McDermott v. Kansas Associates, Inc., Reidt v. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Waletzki v. United States,

Opinion:
ante, p. 1044;
ante, p. 1027;
ante, p. 859;
ante, p. 982;
ante, p. 997;
ante, p. 805;
ante, p. 805;
ante, p. 805;
ante, p. 1016;
ante, p. 889;
ante, p. 934;
ante, p. 956;
ante, p. 972;
ante, p. 959;
ante, p. 1000;
No. 97-6136.
No. 97-6278.
No. 97-6306.
No. 97-6372.
No. 97-6415.
No. 97-6620.
No. 97-6738.
No. 97-6832.
No. 97-7035.
ante, p. 972;
ante, p. 1017;
ante, p. 1018;
ante, p. 1027;
ante, p. 1004;
ante, p. 1057;
ante, p. 1060;
ante, p. 1061; and
ante, p. 1067. Petitions for rehearing denied.