Case Name: Creative Trading Company, Inc., et al., Respondents, v. Larkin-Pluznick-Larkin, Inc., Doing Business as National Fashion & Boutique Show, et al., Appellants
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1990-02-08
Citations: 75 N.Y.2d 830
Docket Number: 
Parties: Creative Trading Company, Inc., et al., Respondents, v Larkin-Pluznick-Larkin, Inc., Doing Business as National Fashion & Boutique Show, et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 75
Pages: 830–831

Head Matter:
Creative Trading Company, Inc., et al., Respondents, v Larkin-Pluznick-Larkin, Inc., Doing Business as National Fashion & Boutique Show, et al., Appellants.
Argued January 11, 1990;
decided February 8, 1990
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Robert G. Sugarman, Lawrence E. Elder and Cheryl L. Davis for appellants.
Whitney North Seymour, Jr., and Craig A. Landy for respondents.
Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Lloyd Constantine, Alan Pfeifer and Susan Beth Farmer of counsel), amicus curiae.
Sheldon I. London for National Association of Exposition Managers, amicus curiae.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order reversed, with costs, defendants' motion to dismiss the third and fourth causes of action of the repleaded complaint granted, and the certified question answered in the negative for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum by Justice Joseph P. Sullivan at the Appellate Division (148 AD2d 352, 354-357).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.