Case Name: Miguel Garcia, Appellant, v. City of New York, Respondent, et al., Defendant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1985-06-28
Citations: 65 N.Y. 805
Docket Number: 
Parties: Miguel Garcia, Appellant, v City of New York, Respondent, et al., Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 65
Pages: 805–807

Head Matter:
Miguel Garcia, Appellant, v City of New York, Respondent, et al., Defendant.
Argued May 29, 1985;
decided June 28, 1985
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Howard S. Davis for appellant.
Frederick A. O. Schwarz, Jr., Corporation Counsel (Edward F. X. Hart and Larry Sonnenshein of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, without costs. We agree with the Appellate Division that there is no evidence "that ought reasonably to satisfy a jury that the fact[s] sought to be proved [are] established" (Blum v Fresh Grown Preserve Corp., 292 NY 241, 246).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander and Boomer. Taking no part: Judge Titone.
Designated pursuant to NY Constitution, article VI, § 2.