Case Name: BALTIMORE BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL v. ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS OF MARYLAND, INC. et al.
Court: Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jurisdiction: Maryland
Decision Date: 1976-11-08
Citations: 278 Md. 464
Docket Number: No. 29
Parties: BALTIMORE BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL v. ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS OF MARYLAND, INC. et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Maryland Reports
Volume: 278
Pages: 464–465

Head Matter:
BALTIMORE BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL v. ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS OF MARYLAND, INC. et al.
[No. 29,
September Term, 1976.]
Decided November 8, 1976.
The cause was argued before Murphy, C. J., and Singley, Smith, Digges and Levine, JJ.
Peter G. Angelos, with whom was Stephen B. Caplis on the brief, for appellant.
Joseph I. Huesman, with whom were Lerch & Huesman on the brief, for appellee Associated Builders & Contractors of Maryland, Inc. Henry R. Wolfe, Assistant Attorney General, with whom was Francis B. Burch, Attorney General, on the brief, for appellee Commissioner of Labor and Industry. Submitted on brief by James P. Bailey, Fulton P. Jeffers and Heame, Fox & Bailey for appellee Board of Education of Wicomico County.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
We granted certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Special Appeals in Associated Builders v. Comm'r, 31 Md. App. 171, 355 A. 2d 509 (1976) and after a careful review we conclude that the judgments of the Baltimore City Court were properly reversed for the reasons stated in the opinion by Judge Menchine.
Judgment of the Court of Special Appeals affirmed.
Costs to be paid by the petitioner, Baltimore Building and Construction Trades Council.