Case Name: Francesco Marsella vs. Attilio Simonelli
Court: Rhode Island Superior Court
Jurisdiction: Rhode Island
Decision Date: 1919-07-31
Citations: 2 Super. Ct. (R.I.) 82
Docket Number: No. 37993
Parties: Francesco Marsella vs. Attilio Simonelli
Judges: 
Reporter: Rhode Island Superior Court Rescripts
Volume: 2
Pages: 82–82

Head Matter:
Francesco Marsella vs. Attilio Simonelli
No. 37993
July 31, 1919
Eor plaintiff: Lee, Boss & McCanna.
For defendant: Washington R. Prescott and Pasquale Romano.

Opinion:
DECISION
DORAN, J.
Eor that part of plaintiff's elaim not represented by his checks, I do not think it clear that the evidence preponderates in favor of plaintiff. A verdict for plaintiff for the debt represented by the ehecks I should not disturb, but plaintiff testified to credits in defendant's favor amounting to about $141. If interest is allowed on the ehecks from their dates, it is impossible with any accuracy to make rests for deduction of the credits. The plaintiff was a most difficult witness to understand. I have not data of sufficient certainty to attempt to make a remittitur.
Motion for new trial granted.