Case Name: Sami C. NUGIEL, Appellant, v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS, etc., et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-03-06
Citations: 808 So. 2d 1273
Docket Number: No. 3D01-1594
Parties: Sami C. NUGIEL, Appellant, v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS, etc., et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before SHEVIN, and RAMIREZ, JJ., and NESBITT, Senior Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 808
Pages: 1273–1273

Head Matter:
Sami C. NUGIEL, Appellant, v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS, etc., et al., Appellees.
No. 3D01-1594.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 6, 2002.
Sami C. Nugiel, in proper person.
John D. Maher (Tallahassee), for Appel-lee, Unemployment Appeals Commission.
Before SHEVIN, and RAMIREZ, JJ., and NESBITT, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. The claimant has failed to demonstrate that any finding of fact made by the appeals referee is without sufficient legal support in the record. See David Clark & Associates, Inc. v. Kennedy, 390 So.2d 149, 151 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980)(As trier of fact, the hearing officer is privileged to weigh and reject conflicting evidence).