Case Name: James L. HENDERSON, Appellant, v. Stacey MICKELSON, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-09-08
Citations: 661 So. 2d 101
Docket Number: No. 94-2661
Parties: James L. HENDERSON, Appellant, v. Stacey MICKELSON, Appellee.
Judges: GOSHORN, HARRIS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 661
Pages: 101–102

Head Matter:
James L. HENDERSON, Appellant, v. Stacey MICKELSON, Appellee.
No. 94-2661.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Sept. 8, 1995.
Rehearing Denied Oct. 12, 1995.
James L. Henderson, Lowell, pro se.
Christopher C. Ford of Ford & Associates, Tavares, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.-
AFFIRMED. The findings and decision of the trial court are presumed correct, and Henderson, as the appellant, had the burden of demonstrating error. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979). Although there is no record of the trial proceeding, Henderson could have availed himself of rule 9.200(b)(4), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, by submitting a statement of the evidence. Based on the record before us, we have no alternative but to affirm the judgment below. Wright v. Wright, 431 So.2d 177, 178 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). See also Carter v. Carter, 504 So.2d 418, 419 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987).
GOSHORN, HARRIS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.