Case Name: The CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, a Municipal Corporation of Florida, and Porter Reynolds, as Mayor, and H. Y. Lockhart, Robert A. Childers, John V. Russell and George C. Petersen, as and constituting the City Commission of the City of Fort Lauderdale, and General M. Wall as City Treasurer and Tax Collector of the City of Fort Lauderdale, Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, upon the relation of Kenneth SMITH, d/b/a Southside Liquors/Appellees
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1956-12-12
Citations: 91 So. 2d 175
Docket Number: 
Parties: The CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, a Municipal Corporation of Florida, and Porter Reynolds, as Mayor, and H. Y. Lockhart, Robert A. Childers, John V. Russell and George C. Petersen, as and constituting the City Commission of the City of Fort Lauderdale, and General M. Wall as City Treasurer and Tax Collector of the City of Fort Lauderdale, Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, upon the relation of Kenneth SMITH, d/b/a Southside Liquors/Appellees.
Judges: DREW, C. J., and TERRELL, HOBSON and THORNAL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 91
Pages: 175–175

Head Matter:
The CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, a Municipal Corporation of Florida, and Porter Reynolds, as Mayor, and H. Y. Lockhart, Robert A. Childers, John V. Russell and George C. Petersen, as and constituting the City Commission of the City of Fort Lauderdale, and General M. Wall as City Treasurer and Tax Collector of the City of Fort Lauderdale, Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, upon the relation of Kenneth SMITH, d/b/a Southside Liquors/Appellees.
Supreme Court of Florida, Division A.
Dec. 12, 1956.
Julian E. Ross, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.
■ Nance & Poling, Fort Lauderdale, for ap-pellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellees to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to 31 F.S.A. Rule 38 of the rules of this court and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said' motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument ;
It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is
Affirmed.
DREW, C. J., and TERRELL, HOBSON and THORNAL, JJ., concur.