Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Andres De La PAZ-AGUILAR, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-08-18
Citations: 71 F. App'x 766
Docket Number: No. 01-50003; D.C. No. CR-00-00069-JSL-1
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Andres De La PAZ-AGUILAR, Defendani>-Appellant.
Judges: Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, HAWKINS, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 71
Pages: 766–767

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Andres De La PAZ-AGUILAR, Defendani>-Appellant.
No. 01-50003. D.C. No. CR-00-00069-JSL-1.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 11, 2003.
Decided Aug. 18, 2003.
Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, HAWKINS, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Andres De La Paz-Aguilar appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.
Counsel for Aguilar has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Aguilar has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no further issues for review. Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED,
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.