Case Name: SUMMIT CONTRACTORS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CRUM & FORSTER SPECIALITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-03-07
Citations: 633 F. App'x 785
Docket Number: No. 15-11051
Parties: SUMMIT CONTRACTORS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CRUM & FORSTER SPECIALITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILLIAM PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges, and ROBRENO, District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 633
Pages: 785–786

Head Matter:
SUMMIT CONTRACTORS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CRUM & FORSTER SPECIALITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 15-11051.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
March 7, 2016.
Mark Andrew Boyle, Sr., Amanda K. Anderson, Molly Ann Chafe, Debbie Sines Crockett, Boyle Gentile & Leonard, PA, Fort Myers, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Holly S. Harvey, Patricia Ann Leid, Thornton Davis & Fein, PA, Miami, FL, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before WILLIAM PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges, and ROBRENO, District Judge.
Honorable Eduardo C. Robreno, United States' District Judge for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Summit Contractors, Inc. ("Summit") appeals summary judgment granted to Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company ("Crum & Forster") in its action under a general liability insurance policy seeking a determination of the applicability of the Self-Insured Retention Endorsement in the policy issued by Crum & Forster. After studying the briefs, reviewing the record, and hearing oral argument in this case, we affirm the judgment of-the district court granting summary judgment to Crum & Forster and denying summary judgment to Summit for the reasons set forth in its Order, .dated February 12, 2015.
AFFIRMED.