Case Name: NAILLING v. UNITED STATES
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1941-12-10
Citations: 124 F.2d 431
Docket Number: No. 8955
Parties: NAILLING v. UNITED STATES.
Judges: Before SIMONS, ALLEN, and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 124
Pages: 431–431

Head Matter:
NAILLING v. UNITED STATES.
No. 8955.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Dec. 10, 1941.
Dwyane D. Maddox, of Huntingdon, Tenn., for appellant.
Wm. McClanahan, U. S. Atty., of Memphis, Tenn., for appellee.
Before SIMONS, ALLEN, and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This case came on to be heard upon the record, briefs, and argument of counsel ; and it appearing that the only question presented relates to the sufficiency of the evidence, and that no motion was made for a directed verdict at the conclusion of all the evidence; and it appearing that this court will not consider the sufficiency of the evidence unless it is satisfied that there has been a miscarriage of justice (Roney v. United States, 6 Cir., 37 F.2d 341); and it also appearing from the record that the evidence amply supports the verdict and judgment and that no injustice has been done:
It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment be, and it hereby is, affirmed.'