Case Name: Edwin C. COLEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RESIDENTIAL CREDIT SOLUTIONS, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-03-28
Citations: 563 F. App'x 264
Docket Number: No. 14-1013
Parties: Edwin C. COLEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RESIDENTIAL CREDIT SOLUTIONS, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before GREGORY, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 563
Pages: 264–265

Head Matter:
Edwin C. COLEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RESIDENTIAL CREDIT SOLUTIONS, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 14-1013.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 25, 2014.
Decided: March 28, 2014.
Edwin C. Coleman, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Grasis, Rathbun & Goldberg, PC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before GREGORY, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Edwin C. Coleman appeals the district court's orders dismissing his civil complaint for failure to state a claim and denying his motion for reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the court's order of dismissal for the reasons stated by the district court. Coleman v. Residential Credit Solutions, No. 1:13-cv-02400-JFM (D.Md. Oct. 25, 2013). Further, we conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for reconsideration. Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b); Aikens v. Ingram, 652 F.3d 496, 501 (4th Cir.2011) (en banc) (stating standard of review). We grant Coleman leave to proceed in forma pauper-is. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.