Case Name: Vaughan B. CONNELLY and M. Louise Connelly, his wife, Appellants, v. Joseph A. WINTERMANTEL, Appellee, and City of Miami, Intervenor
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1968-05-28
Citations: 211 So. 2d 49
Docket Number: No. 67-762
Parties: Vaughan B. CONNELLY and M. Louise Connelly, his wife, Appellants, v. Joseph A. WINTERMANTEL, Appellee, and City of Miami, Intervenor.
Judges: Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and SWANN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 211
Pages: 49–49

Head Matter:
Vaughan B. CONNELLY and M. Louise Connelly, his wife, Appellants, v. Joseph A. WINTERMANTEL, Appellee, and City of Miami, Intervenor.
No. 67-762.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
May 28, 1968.
Rehearing Denied June 25, 1968.
Palermo & Connelly, Miami, for appellants.
Fogle & Fordham, Miami, for appellee.
Alan Rothstein, City Atty., and John G. Thomas, Asst. City Atty., for intervenor.
Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and SWANN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This appeal attempts to set aside a judicial sale as the result of a foreclosure judgment.
It is not contended there was any irregularity in the sale; only that it is possible that a re-sale will result in a higher price. We find this to be an inadequate ground for ordering a re-sale. Ruff v. Guaranty Title & Trust Co., 99 Fla. 197, 126 So. 383; Certain Lands, etc. v. City of Coronado Beach, 128 Fla. 884, 175 So. 774; Northern Investment Corporation v. Coppock, 134 Fla. 168, 183 So. 635.
Affirmed.