Case Name: Frances E. THIGPIN, as Clerk of the Circuit Court of Marion County, Petitioner, v. SUN BANK OF OCALA, as Trustee, Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1984-09-20
Citations: 458 So. 2d 315
Docket Number: No. 84-568
Parties: Frances E. THIGPIN, as Clerk of the Circuit Court of Marion County, Petitioner, v. SUN BANK OF OCALA, as Trustee, Respondent.
Judges: SHARP, J., concurs.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 458
Pages: 315–317

Head Matter:
Frances E. THIGPIN, as Clerk of the Circuit Court of Marion County, Petitioner, v. SUN BANK OF OCALA, as Trustee, Respondent.
No. 84-568.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Sept. 20, 1984.
Rehearing Denied Oct. 31, 1984.
Robert R. McDonald and Fred W. Bag-gett of Roberts, Baggett, LaFace, Richard & Wiser, Tallahassee, and Michael Mil-brath, Ocala, for petitioner.
Willard Ayres of Ayres, Cluster, Curry, McCall & Briggs, P.A., Ocala, for respondent.

Opinion:
COBB, Chief Judge.
The defendant, Frances E. Thigpin, as Clerk of the Circuit Court of Marion County, has filed a timely notice of appeal from the trial court's order denying her motion to dismiss the plaintiffs complaint. Said order is a non-final, non-appealable order. This court, however, by order dated July 5, 1984, is treating this cause as a petition for writ of certiorari.
This cause originated when the plaintiff, Sun Bank of Ocala, as Trustee, filed a negligence action against Frances E. Thig-pin as Clerk of-the Circuit Court of Marion County on February 21, 1984, alleging the Clerk had failed to record a mortgage which Sun Bank, as mortgagee, had submitted for recordation. The Clerk moved to dismiss Sun Bank's complaint on two grounds: (1) that the plaintiff had failed to meet the three year statute of limitations for filing claims against the state under section 768.28(6)(a), Florida Statutes (1983); (2) that the state had not yet denied the plaintiff's claim and plaintiff could not file its action until the state had done so. The trial court rendered an order denying the motion to dismiss wherein it stated that the amended complaint created "an issue of fact as to when plaintiff's cause of action, if any, accrued." The trial court then stayed further proceedings in the cause other than discovery until the running of the six month period for final disposition of a claim by the agency under section 768.-28(6)(a), Florida Statutes (1983).
Section 768.28(6)(a), Florida Statutes (1983) provides in relevant part:
An action may not be instituted on a claim against the state or one of its agencies or subdivisions unless the claimant presents the claim in writing to the appropriate agency, and also, except as to any claim against a municipality, presents such claim in writing to the Department of Insurance, within three years after such claim accrues and the Department of Insurance or the appropriate agency denies the claim in writing. . The failure of the Department of Insurance or the appropriate agency to make final disposition of a claim within six months after it is filed shall be deemed a final denial of the claim for purposes of this section....
We agree with the trial court's determination that the amended complaint created an issue of fact as to date of accrual of the cause of action. It is apparent, however, that the plaintiff instituted this action against the clerk, a state agency, prior to any denial of its written claim as required by the foregoing statute. There was no written denial and six months from filing of the claim had not elapsed at the time suit was filed.
The trial court's order constitutes a departure from essential requirements of law because of the premature, thus impermissible, discovery it authorizes. See Briggs v. Salcines, 392 So.2d 263 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980), review denied, 397 So.2d 779 (Fla.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 815, 102 S.Ct. 92, 70 L.Ed.2d 84 (1981). The proper remedy when a complaint fails to allege performance of a condition precedent is dismissal with leave to amend. Commercial Carrier Corp. v. Indian River County, 371 So.2d 1010 (Fla.1979); Askew v. County of Volusia, 450 So.2d 233 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).
We grant certiorari review, quash the trial court's order dated March 13, 1984, and remand for dismissal of the amended complaint without prejudice.
WRIT GRANTED.
SHARP, J., concurs.
COWART, J.,- dissents with opinion.