Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Martell WHITAKER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-06-05
Citations: 183 F. App'x 395
Docket Number: No. 05-7948
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Martell WHITAKER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 183
Pages: 395–396

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Martell WHITAKER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-7948.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 21, 2006.
Decided: June 5, 2006.
Martell Whitaker, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Barrett Taylor, Office of the United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Martell Whitaker appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Whitaker, No. CR-98-1016 (D.S.C. Nov. 29, 2005). We grant the motion to vacate the supple mental informal brief and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED