Case Name: MAUD M. FORDYCE, Appellant, v. L. M. SPIEGL, Respondent
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1917-06-20
Citations: 34 Cal. App. 802
Docket Number: Civ. No. 2056
Parties: MAUD M. FORDYCE, Appellant, v. L. M. SPIEGL, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports
Volume: 34
Pages: 802–802

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 2056.
First Appellate District.
June 20, 1917.]
MAUD M. FORDYCE, Appellant, v. L. M. SPIEGL, Respondent.
Negligence—Personal Injuries.—Order denying a new trial affirmed on t'he authority of Kerner v. S-pieglj ante, p. 162.
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco denying a new trial. A. E. Graupner, Judge.
The facts are identical with those stated in the case of Kerner v. Spiegl, ante, p. 162, [166 Pac. 1013].
Hamilton A. Báuer, for Appellant.
Walter H. Linforth, for Respondent.

Opinion:
RICHARDS, J.
The facts of this case are in all respects identical with the facts, in the case of Kerner v. Spiegl, ante, p. 162, [166 Pac. 1013], pending in this court, and this day decided, and the opinion in that case is equally applicable to the present one.
The order denying the plaintiff's motion for a new trial is affirmed.
Beasly, J., pro tern., and Kerrigan, J., concurred.
A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on August 16, 1917.