Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Bryan EVANS, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2017-11-07
Citations: 533 S.W.3d 238
Docket Number: No. ED 104710
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Bryan EVANS, Appellant.
Judges: Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J. and Sherri B. Sullivan and Kurt S. Odenwald, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 533
Pages: 238–238

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Bryan EVANS, Appellant.
No. ED 104710
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Filed: November 7, 2017
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: Jay L. Kanzler, Jr., 2001 S. Big Bend Blvd., St. Louis, MO 63117.
ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Christine K. Lesicko, Asst. Attorney General, P. O. Box 899,' Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899.
Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J. and Sherri B. Sullivan and Kurt S. Odenwald, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Bryan Evans ("Defendant") appeals from the judgment entered after a jury trial on his convictions for numerous counts of assault, armed criminal action, unlawful use of a weapon and burglary. We find no clear error in the denial of Defendant's challenge under' Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), no plain error in accepting the verdicts and no abuse of discretion in the admission of 911 tapes. We affirm.
An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).