Case Name: Servando CRUZ-CAMACHO; Maria De Jesus Mora, Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-06-14
Citations: 234 F. App'x 638
Docket Number: No. 05-76652
Parties: Servando CRUZ-CAMACHO; Maria De Jesus Mora, Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 234
Pages: 638–639

Head Matter:
Servando CRUZ-CAMACHO; Maria De Jesus Mora, Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 05-76652.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 5, 2007 .
Filed June 14, 2007.
Philippe Dwelshauvers, Esq., Fresno, CA, for Petitioners.
Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Steven J. Saltiel, Esq., USSF—Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
Before: LEAVY, RYMER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Servando Cruz-Camacho and Maria de Jesus Mora petition for review of the BIA's denial of their motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a), and we deny the petition. The BIA correctly denied the motion as untimely, and certainly did not abuse its discretion by doing so. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (providing time limit); Lara-Torres v. Ashcroft, 383 F.3d 968, 972 (9th Cir.2004) (reciting the standard of review). Petitioners have not asserted, much less established, eligibility for equitable tolling. See Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 897 (9th Cir .2003).
PETITION DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.