Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jovito Matas BINOYA, II, a/k/a Jay, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-12-30
Citations: 359 F. App'x 383
Docket Number: No. 09-7683
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jovito Matas BINOYA, II, a/k/a Jay, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 359
Pages: 383–383

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jovito Matas BINOYA, II, a/k/a Jay, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 09-7683.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 17, 2009.
Decided: Dec. 30, 2009.
Jovito Matas Binoya, II, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Joseph Grooms, III, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jovito Matas Binoya, II, appeals the district court's order denying his "Motion to Compel; Motion to Request Specific Performance of the Government to Grant Reduction of Sentence for Substancial [sic] Assistance." We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Binoya, No. 1:07-cr-00319-TSE-1 (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 26, 2009; entered Aug. 27, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.