Case Name: ISABEL M. McGRATH AND WILLIAM A. McGRATH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, v. OLIVER FRAKE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1929-10-16
Citations: 7 N.J. Misc. 899
Docket Number: 
Parties: ISABEL M. McGRATH AND WILLIAM A. McGRATH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, v. OLIVER FRAKE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 7
Pages: 899–899

Head Matter:
ISABEL M. McGRATH AND WILLIAM A. McGRATH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, v. OLIVER FRAKE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Decided October 16, 1929.
Before Gummeee, Chief Justice, and Justices Parker and Bodine.
Eor the defendant-appellant, Applegate, Stevens, Foster, Leonard & Reussille.
Eor the plaintiffs-appellees, Cook & Stout.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The plaintiffs recovered judgments against the defendant. The sole ground of appeal is that the trial judge improperly charged the jury with respect to contributory negligence. We think that the trial judge correctly charged the point. Durant v. Palmer, 29 N. J. L. 544 (at p. 547).
The judgment will be affirmed.