Case Name: Mack J. WALL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. E. Wilson PURDY, Director of Public Safety, Dade County, Fla., Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1972-08-01
Citations: 465 F.2d 933
Docket Number: No. 71-1388
Parties: Mack J. WALL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. E. Wilson PURDY, Director of Public Safety, Dade County, Fla., Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 465
Pages: 933–933

Head Matter:
Mack J. WALL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. E. Wilson PURDY, Director of Public Safety, Dade County, Fla., Respondent-Appellee.
No. 71-1388
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 1, 1972.
As Amended on Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied Sept. 7, 1972.
Bruce S. Rogow, Miami, Fla., for peti- ' tioner-appellant.
Jack R. Blumenfeld, Asst. State Atty., Miami, Fla., for respondent-appellee.
Before BELL, DYER and CLARK, Circuit Judges.
Rule 18, 5 Cir.; Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al. 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The order of the district court, 321 F.Supp. 367, denying habeas corpus relief to the appellant is vacated, and the cause is remanded with directions to determine whether the appellant was advised of his right to counsel and whether he voluntarily and intelligently waived that right in connection with his said trial. If there was no valid waiver of appellant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel, then he is entitled either to have his conviction and sentence of imprisonment set aside or, if the respondent should desire to retry him for the offense, to his Sixth Amendment rights to counsel in the event, on retrial, the court might contemplate a sentence of imprisonment. Argersinger v. Hamlin, 1972, 407 U.S. 25, 92 S.Ct. 2006, 32 L.Ed. 530.
Vacated and remanded, with directions.
. See Goodwin v. Smith, 5 Cir. 1971, 439 F.2d 1180.