Case Name: Frederick George ROEHLER, II, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert BORG, Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1992-03-04
Citations: 957 F.2d 729
Docket Number: No. 90-56232
Parties: Frederick George ROEHLER, II, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert BORG, Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: Before REINHARDT and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges, and SMITH, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 957
Pages: 729–732

Head Matter:
Frederick George ROEHLER, II, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert BORG, Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 90-56232.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted July 8, 1991.
Decided March 4, 1992.
Dissenting Opinion Amended April 10, 1992.
Dennis E. Riordan, Riordan & Rosenthal, San Francisco, Cal., and Wendy Cole Lascher and Edward L. Lascher, Lascher & Lascher, Ventura, Cal., for petitioner-appellant.
David F. Glassman, Asst. Atty. Gen. and Donald F. Roeschke, Supervising Deputy Atty. Gen., Los Angeles, Cal., for respondents-appellees.
Before REINHARDT and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges, and SMITH, District Judge.
The Honorable Fern M. Smith, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
ORDER AND DISSENT FROM DENIAL OF LEAVE TO FILE A PETITION FOR REHEARING
The motion for leave to file petition for rehearing (and to file the associated petition for rehearing en banc) is DENIED.
. In light of Judge Reinhardt's dissent, we would only add that we do not find the reasons for still another extension of time to be persuasive. Moreover, this panel has already given extended, detailed, and careful consideration to all of Roehler's arguments.