Case Name: William F. FLICKINGER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1994-05-24
Citations: 636 So. 2d 601
Docket Number: No. 93-2899
Parties: William F. FLICKINGER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and NESBITT, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 636
Pages: 601–602

Head Matter:
William F. FLICKINGER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 93-2899.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 24, 1994.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Rosa C. Figarola, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Charles M. Fahlbusch, Asst. Atty. Gen., and David T. Sale, Certified Legal Intern, for appellee.
Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and NESBITT, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
It appearing that appellant's probation was improperly revoked because the state failed to establish at the probation revocation hearing that the defendant committed, as charged, a new offense subsequent to being placed on probation (there being no evidence adduced as to when the new offense was committed) see and compare Stafford v. State, 465 So.2d 385 (Fla.1984), the order revoking same is reversed and the matter is returned to the trial court with directions to reestablish the probation.
Reversed and remanded with directions.