Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Phillip James WILLIAMS, a/k/a D, a/k/a PJ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-06-29
Citations: 667 F. App'x 62
Docket Number: No. 16-6361
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Phillip James WILLIAMS, a/k/a D, a/k/a PJ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 667
Pages: 62–63

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Phillip James WILLIAMS, a/k/a D, a/k/a PJ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-6361
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 23, 2016
Decided: June 29, 2016
Philip James Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley, Jr,, Jimmie Ewing, Stanley D. Ragsdale, Assistant United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina; Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Phillip James Williams appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction under Amendment 780 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Williams, No. 4:09-cr-00073- TLW-1 (D.S.C. filed Feb. 29, 2016, entered Mar. 1, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED