Case Name: Ashish JAIN, Petitioner/Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-06-24
Citations: 114 S.W.3d 336
Docket Number: No. ED 81886
Parties: Ashish JAIN, Petitioner/Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before PAUL J. SIMON, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, SR. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 114
Pages: 336–336

Head Matter:
Ashish JAIN, Petitioner/Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Defendant/Respondent.
No. ED 81886.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
June 24, 2003.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 21, 2003.
Application for Transfer Denied Sept. 30, 2003.
Robert S. Adler, Law Office of Robert S. Adler, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Emily Rushing Kelly, Assistant Attorney General, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before PAUL J. SIMON, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, SR. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, Ashish Jain, appeals from an adverse judgment on his Petition for Review of License Revocation. No error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).