Case Name: CARGILL-ALLIANT, LLC, Appellant, v. GPU SERVICES, INC.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-02-01
Citations: 29 F. App'x 820
Docket Number: No. 01-1605
Parties: CARGILL-ALLIANT, LLC, Appellant, v. GPU SERVICES, INC.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 29
Pages: 820–821

Head Matter:
CARGILL-ALLIANT, LLC, Appellant, v. GPU SERVICES, INC.
No. 01-1605.
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Argued Jan. 17, 2002.
Opinion Filed Feb. 1, 2002.
Brad Fagg (Argued), Morgan, Lewis & Brockius, LLP, Washington, DC, Counsel for Appellant.
Alfred W. Putnam, Jr. (argued), Jeff A. Almeida, Drinker, Biddle & Reath, LLP, Philadelphia, PA, Counsel for Appellee.
Before: ALITO and ROTH, Circuit Judges, and SCHWARZER, Senior District Judge.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT
PER CURIAM.
The facts and procedural background of this case are familiar to the parties. After a bench trial, the District Court properly held for GPU Services. In its 47-page Opinion, the District Court correctly concluded that GPU Services did not breach its contractual obligations to Cargill-Alliant. Therefore, Appellant cannot recover from Appellee for its alleged loss of $2.3 million. We have considered all of Appellant's arguments and find no ground to reverse.
The Order of the District Court is AFFIRMED.