Case Name: ROBINSON v. METROPOLITAN ST. RY. CO.
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1901-04-22
Citations: 69 N.Y.S. 891
Docket Number: 
Parties: ROBINSON v. METROPOLITAN ST. RY. CO.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 69
Pages: 891–891

Head Matter:
ROBINSON v. METROPOLITAN ST. RY. CO.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
April 22, 1901.)
Carriers—Injury to Passenger—Husband and Wife—Damages—Loss of Wife's Earnings—Medical Expenses.
In an action by a husband against a carrier for injury to his wife from the premature starting of a car she was attempting to board, the husband is entitled to recover for loss of his wife’s earnings and for medical expenses furnished.
Appeal from municipal court of city of New York, First district.
Action by Walter Robinson against the Metropolitan Street-Railway Company. From a judgment of the New York City municipal court in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals.
Affirmed.
Argued before BISCHOFF, P. J., and CLARKE and LEVEN-TRITT, JJ.
G-. Grlenn Worden, for appellant.
J. M. Birnbaum, for respondent.

Opinion:
BISCHOFF, P. J.
The appellant produced no evidence, and the record discloses no exceptions, other than those taken to the denial of the motion for the dismissal of the complaint, and to the refusal to withdraw from the jury the claim for loss of earnings and expense incurred for medical attendance. The evidence amply supports the cause of action for negligence, based upon the act of the defendant in causing its car to be started while the plaintiff's wife was attempting to board it, after it had come to a stop for the purpose. The circumstances negative the presence of contributory negligence sufficiently for the finding of the jury, and, upon the record, the plaintiff was properly allowed to recover for the loss of his wife's earnings and for medical expenses. From our examination of the case, we conclude that the appeal is without merit, and that argument is wholly unnecessary to sustain the judgment, in assailing which the appellant has deemed it inexpedient to submit a brief.
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.