Case Name: BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. and David Goldfarb, M.D., Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants-Appellees, and C.R. Bard, Inc., Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee, v. W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC., Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellant; Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and David Goldfarb, M.D., Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants-Appellants, and C.R. Bard, Inc., Counterclaim Defendant, v. W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-12-28
Citations: 405 F. App'x 501
Docket Number: Nos. 2010-1510, 2010-1542
Parties: BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. and David Goldfarb, M.D., Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants-Appellees, and C.R. Bard, Inc., Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee, v. W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC., Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellant. Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and David Goldfarb, M.D., Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants-Appellants, and C.R. Bard, Inc., Counterclaim Defendant, v. W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 405
Pages: 501–502

Head Matter:
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. and David Goldfarb, M.D., Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants-Appellees, and C.R. Bard, Inc., Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee, v. W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC., Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellant. Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and David Goldfarb, M.D., Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants-Appellants, and C.R. Bard, Inc., Counterclaim Defendant, v. W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellee.
Nos. 2010-1510, 2010-1542.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Dec. 28, 2010.
John C. O’Quinn, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants-Appellants.
David H. Pfeffer, Locke, Lord Bissell & Liddell, LLP, New York, NY, for Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellant.

Opinion:
ON MOTION
ORDER
Upon consideration of Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and David Goldfarb, M.D.'s motion to voluntarily withdraw its appeal,
It Is Ordered That:
(1) The motion is granted. The cross-appeal, 2010-1542, is dismissed.
(2) Each side shall bear its own costs in 2010-1542.
(8) The revised official caption for 2010-1510 is reflected above.