Case Name: John McDOWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2003-12-18
Citations: 861 So. 2d 107
Docket Number: No. 1D02-3124
Parties: John McDOWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: WOLF, C.J., ERVIN and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 861
Pages: 107–107

Head Matter:
John McDOWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D02-3124.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Dec. 18, 2003.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Richard M. Summa, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Daniel A. David, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm, but, as in Walker v. State, 853 So.2d 498 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003), certify the following question to be one of great public importance:
IS THE FLORIDA STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTION ON "POSSESSION OF PROPERTY RECENTLY STOLEN" AN IMPERMISSIBLE COMMENT ON THE EVIDENCE?
AFFIRMED.
WOLF, C.J., ERVIN and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.