Case Name: The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Jells, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2000-12-27
Citations: 90 Ohio St. 3d 454
Docket Number: No. 00-1053
Parties: The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Jells, Appellant.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 90
Pages: 454–455

Head Matter:
The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Jells, Appellant.
[Cite as State v. Jells (2000), 90 Ohio St.3d 454.]
(No. 00-1053
Submitted October 10, 2000
Decided December 27, 2000.)
William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Reno J. Ordani, J.r., Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
Shawn Martin, for appellant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Based on the reasoning set forth in its opinion, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying appellant's application for reopening for failing to establish a colorable claim of ineffective assistance of counsel on the part of appellate counsel. Spivey, supra, 84 Ohio St.3d at 25, 701 N.E.2d at 697. In none of the six instances has Jells raised "a genuine issue as to whether [he] was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel on appeal" before the court of appeals, as required under App.R. 26(B).
Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.