Case Name: R.E.K., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-07-16
Citations: 84 S.W.3d 111
Docket Number: No. ED 80259
Parties: R.E.K., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 84
Pages: 111–111

Head Matter:
R.E.K., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY, Defendant/Respondent.
No. ED 80259.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
July 16, 2002.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 29, 2002.
Michael A. Gross, Stephen M. Ryals, Ryals & Soffer, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Robert T. Haar, Haar & Woods, LLP, Susan E. Bindler, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff appeals the summary judgment of trial court in defendant's favor. The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).