Case Name: Maria Portillo, Respondent, v. 137 East 110th Street, LLC, Appellant, et al., Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2006-01-03
Citations: 25 A.D.3d 328
Docket Number: 
Parties: Maria Portillo, Respondent, v 137 East 110th Street, LLC, Appellant, et al., Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 25
Pages: 328–328

Head Matter:
Maria Portillo, Respondent, v 137 East 110th Street, LLC, Appellant, et al., Defendants.
[805 NYS2d 831]

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth L. Thompson, Jr., J.), entered April 6, 2005, denying the motion of defendant 137 East 110th Street, LLC, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Triable issues of fact exist as to whether appellant retained control over the cellar doors on its premises and, if so, whether it had constructive notice of the tripping hazard allegedly presented by those doors. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.