Case Name: Konnie CARTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-10-20
Citations: 111 F. App'x 511
Docket Number: No. 03-35253; D.C. No. CV-01-00251-LRS
Parties: Konnie CARTER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 111
Pages: 511–511

Head Matter:
Konnie CARTER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 03-35253.
D.C. No. CV-01-00251-LRS.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 8, 2004.
Decided Oct. 20, 2004.
Rebecca Mary Coufal, Spokane, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
David M. Blume, Esq., Seattle, WA, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before KOZINSKI, FERNANDEZ and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
1. The ALJ found, based on the vocational expert's testimony, that even if Carter could not perform her past work, she could still perform sedentary jobs that exist in significant numbers in the national economy. See 20 C.F.R. § 416.920(a)(4)(v). Carter did not challenge this finding. Therefore, the ALJ's determination that Carter is not disabled is supported by substantial evidence.
2. Carter argues that it was error not to allow cross-examination of the vocational expert. We do not consider this argument, which was not raised before the district court. See Edlund v. Massanari, 253 F.3d 1152, 1158 (9th Cir.2001).
3. Carter is not entitled to attorney fees under EAJA, which are reserved for prevailing parties. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.