Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Norberto AVENDANO-LOPEZ, also known as Nolberto Avendano-Lopez, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-06-04
Citations: 280 F. App'x 379
Docket Number: No. 07-51386
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Norberto AVENDANO-LOPEZ, also known as Nolberto Avendano-Lopez, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 280
Pages: 379–379

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Norberto AVENDANO-LOPEZ, also known as Nolberto Avendano-Lopez, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-51386
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
June 4, 2008.
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Judy Fulmer Madewell, Federal Public Defender’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Norberto Avendano-Lopez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir.2007), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 872, 169 L.Ed.2d 737 (2008). The Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.