Case Name: B. B. BOULDIN v. GARLAND DANIEL
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 1909-11-11
Citations: 151 N.C. 283
Docket Number: 
Parties: B. B. BOULDIN v. GARLAND DANIEL.
Judges: 
Reporter: North Carolina Reports
Volume: 151
Pages: 283–284

Head Matter:
B. B. BOULDIN v. GARLAND DANIEL.
(Filed 11 November, 1909.)
Discretion of Trial Court — Verdict—Weight of Evidence — Testimony of Witnesses.
Motion for new trial upon affidavit in respect to the testimony of a witness, and for that the verdict is contrary to the weight of the- evidence, are matters strictly within the discretion of the lower court.
Appeal by defendant from Long, J., August Term, 1907, of Guilford.
Stedman & Coolce for plaintiff.
ff. S. Bradshaw and Q. E. McLean for defendant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam :
Upon an examination of the record in this case, the Court is of opinion that the questions involved are entirely questions of fact and that they have been settled by the verdict of the jury.
We find no merit in the assignments of error relating to the evidence and the charge.
The motion of the defendant for a' new trial, based upon the defendant's affidavit in respect to the testimony of Yanderford, is a matter strictly within the sound discretion of the judge below. The same is true in regard to a motion for new trial for that the verdict is contrary to the weight of the evidence'. Freeman v. Bell, 150 N. C., 146; Benton v. Railroad, 122 N. C., 1009.
Affirmed.