Case Name: James M. MALONEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Andrew CUOMO, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of New York, David Paterson, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of New York, Kathleen A. Rice, in her official capacity as District Attorney of the County of Nassau, and their successors, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-08-13
Citations: 390 F. App'x 29
Docket Number: No. 07-0581-cv
Parties: James M. MALONEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Andrew CUOMO, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of New York, David Paterson, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of New York, Kathleen A. Rice, in her official capacity as District Attorney of the County of Nassau, and their successors, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Present: ROSEMARY S. POOLER and ROBERT A. KATZMANN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 390
Pages: 29–29

Head Matter:
James M. MALONEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Andrew CUOMO, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of New York, David Paterson, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of New York, Kathleen A. Rice, in her official capacity as District Attorney of the County of Nassau, and their successors, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 07-0581-cv.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Aug. 13, 2010.
James M. Maloney, appearing pro se, Port Washington, N.Y.
Karen Hutson, Deputy County Attorney (Loma B. Goodman, County Attorney, on the brief), Nassau County District Attorney, Mineóla, N.Y., for Defendant-Appel-lee Kathleen A. Rice.
Present: ROSEMARY S. POOLER and ROBERT A. KATZMANN, Circuit Judges.
The Honorable Sonia Sotomayor, originally a member of this panel, was elevated to the Supreme Court on August 8, 2009. The remaining two panel members, who are in agreement, have determined the' matter. See 28 U.S.C. § 46(d); Second Circuit Internal Operating Procedure E(b); United States v. Desimone, 140 F.3d 457, 458-59 (2d Cir.1998).

Opinion:
SUMMARY ORDER
After our decision in Maloney v. Cuomo, 554 F.3d 56 (2d Cir.2009) (per curiam), plaintiff James M. Maloney petitioned the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. The Supreme Court granted the writ of certiorari, vacated the decision of this Court, and remanded the case for further consideration in light of McDonald v. Chicago, 561 U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 3020, 177 L.Ed.2d 894 (2010).
We now.VACATE the judgment of the district court and REMAND for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court.