Case Name: JOSEPH BUCCINO vs. THE SINGER MANUFACTURING CO.
Court: Connecticut Superior Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1935-03-19
Citations: 1 Conn. Supp. 88
Docket Number: File #44731
Parties: JOSEPH BUCCINO vs. THE SINGER MANUFACTURING CO.
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Supplement
Volume: 1
Pages: 88–88

Head Matter:
JOSEPH BUCCINO vs. THE SINGER MANUFACTURING CO.
Superior Court Fairfield County
File #44731
. Present: Hon. ALFRED C. BALDWIN, Judge.
Henry Greenstein, Attorney for the Plaintiff.
Pullman & Comley, Attorneys for the Defendant.
MEMORANDUM FILED MARCH 19, 1935.

Opinion:
BALDWIN, J.
The plaintiff moves that the defendant be
required to make its second and third defenses more specific "by stating more particularly in what paragraph or paragraphs of the complaint are contained the cause of action as to which" each such defense is interposed.
It is apparent upon a reading of the complaint and these defenses that neither defense is addressed to any particular paragraph or paragraphs. These defenses are each addressed to the cause of action itself which is set up in the complaint as a whole and not to a specific paragraph or paragraphs.
If the plaintiff thinks that neither defense is good, he may test such question by demurrer.
The motion is denied