Case Name: Ronald PETERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1972-06-27
Citations: 264 So. 2d 45
Docket Number: No. 71-765
Parties: Ronald PETERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: CROSS, OWEN, and MAGER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 264
Pages: 45–46

Head Matter:
Ronald PETERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 71-765.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
June 27, 1972.
Walter N. Colbath, Jr., Public Defender, and Carl V. M. Coffin, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Nelson E. Bailey, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have reviewed the briefs and record on appeal and on the basis thereof we are of the opinion that no reversible error has been demonstrated. Fisher v. State, Fla.App.1970, 239 So.2d 863; Mears v. State, Fla.App.1970, 232 So.2d 749; Mitchell v. State, Fla.App.1967, 203 So.2d 676 cert. den. 392 U.S. 913, 88 S.Ct. 2073, 20 L.Ed.2d 1371; Ghelfi v. State, Fla.App.1971, 251 So.2d 720; Marshall v. State, Fla.App.1969, 224 So.2d 723; Stratos v. State, Fla.App.1964, 167 So.2d 771; and Wade v. State, Fla.App.1965, 175 So.2d 572. See also Long v. United States, 1969, 137 U.S.App.D.C. 311, 424 F.2d 799. Our determination, which is based upon a review of the record and a consideration of the applicable decisions, was not aided by the state's brief which was not responsive to the matters under review.
The judgment appealed from is, therefore, affirmed.
CROSS, OWEN, and MAGER, JJ., concur.