Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. CLARENCE CHARLES NAGELMAKER, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1992-11-04
Citations: 116 Or. App. 245
Docket Number: 90-CR-0547; CA A71124
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. CLARENCE CHARLES NAGELMAKER, Appellant.
Judges: Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 116
Pages: 245–245

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted September 30,
conviction affirmed; remanded for reconsideration of restitution November 4,
reconsideration denied December 30,1992,
petition for review denied January 26, 1993 (315 Or 312)
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. CLARENCE CHARLES NAGELMAKER, Appellant.
(90-CR-0547; CA A71124)
839 P2d 287
Dan Maloney, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem.
Robert B. Rocklin, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Mary H. Williams, Assistant Attorney General, Salem.
Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Conviction affirmed; remanded for reconsideration of restitution. State v. Wilcher, 96 Or App 603, 773 P2d 803 (1989).