Case Name: Nathan Hutkoff, Respondent, v. The Pennsylvania Railroad Co., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1900-03
Citations: 30 Misc. 802
Docket Number: 
Parties: Nathan Hutkoff, Respondent, v. The Pennsylvania Railroad Co., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 30
Pages: 802–803

Head Matter:
Nathan Hutkoff, Respondent, v. The Pennsylvania Railroad Co., Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff.
Robinson, Biddle & Ward, for appellant.
Nathan, Leventritt & Perham, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The evidence of the witness Sammeck warrants a conclusion that the-glass was in good condition when it was delivered upon the car. .
As the defendant's counsel upon the argument conceded that if this conclusion was warranted the judgment must be affirmed, it is-affirmed, with costs.
Present: Truax, P. J.; Scott and Dugro, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.