Case Name: Joseph M. RUSSELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael P. MCWEENY; Commonwealth of Virginia; Victor Elion, P.H.D., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-01-21
Citations: 308 F. App'x 666
Docket Number: No. 08-2265
Parties: Joseph M. RUSSELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael P. MCWEENY; Commonwealth of Virginia; Victor Elion, P.H.D., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 308
Pages: 666–666

Head Matter:
Joseph M. RUSSELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael P. MCWEENY; Commonwealth of Virginia; Victor Elion, P.H.D., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 08-2265.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 15, 2009.
Decided: Jan. 21, 2009.
Joseph M. Russell, Appellant Pro Se. Christy Monolo, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia; William Norman Watkins, Sands, Anderson, Marks & Miller, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Joseph R. Russell appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil complaint pursuant to District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 103 S.Ct. 1303, 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983), and Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413, 44 S.Ct. 149, 68 L.Ed. 362 (1923). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Russell v. McWeeny, No. 4:08-cv-00063-JBF-JEB (E.D.Va. Oct. 2, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.