Case Name: BULK CARRIERS, INC., and Robert P. Kapler, Appellants, v. Tuan Anh TRUONG, et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-12-22
Citations: 629 So. 2d 960
Docket Number: No. 92-1641
Parties: BULK CARRIERS, INC., and Robert P. Kapler, Appellants, v. Tuan Anh TRUONG, et al., Appellees.
Judges: DELL, C.J., and STONE and WARNER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 629
Pages: 960–961

Head Matter:
BULK CARRIERS, INC., and Robert P. Kapler, Appellants, v. Tuan Anh TRUONG, et al., Appellees.
No. 92-1641.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Dec. 22, 1993.
Rehearing and Certification Denied Jan. 28, 1994.
John Beranek of Aurell, Radey, Hinkle, Thomas & Beranek, Tallahassee, and Stephen E. Knoerr of Riley, Knoerr & Consola-zio, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.
J. Michael Burman of Slawson, Burman & Critton, North Palm Beach, and Edna L. Caruso of Edna L. Caruso, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. The appellant challenges a jury instruction given in answer to a question the jury asked. We find that there was no error in the minor modification to the standard charge. Even were it to have been error, a full review of the transcript convinces us it was harmless. See Edwards v. State, 351 So.2d 358 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977).
Appellant also challenges as cumulative various other evidentiary rulings. However, the objections made at trial did not preserve most of these issues for appeal or they were harmless.
Having reviewed the full trial transcript, we find no miscarriage of justice which would warrant a new trial. § 59.041, Fla.Stat. (1991).
DELL, C.J., and STONE and WARNER, JJ., concur.