Case Name: Herbil Holding Co., Respondent, v. Carl Hein, Appellant. (Action No. 1.) Edward Hermans, Respondent, v. Herbil Holding Co., Defendant, and Carl Hein, Appellant. (Action No. 2.)
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1990-02-20
Citations: 158 A.D.2d 588
Docket Number: 
Parties: Herbil Holding Co., Respondent, v Carl Hein, Appellant. (Action No. 1.) Edward Hermans, Respondent, v Herbil Holding Co., Defendant, and Carl Hein, Appellant. (Action No. 2.)
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 158
Pages: 588–588

Head Matter:
Herbil Holding Co., Respondent, v Carl Hein, Appellant. (Action No. 1.) Edward Hermans, Respondent, v Herbil Holding Co., Defendant, and Carl Hein, Appellant. (Action No. 2.)

Opinion:
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs, for reasons stated by Justice Brucia in the Supreme Court. Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Eiber and Harwood, JJ., concur.