Case Name: MAY SCHLEIN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CAMILLE L. GAIROARD, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1941-10-20
Citations: 127 N.J.L. 358
Docket Number: 
Parties: MAY SCHLEIN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CAMILLE L. GAIROARD, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 127
Pages: 358–365

Head Matter:
MAY SCHLEIN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CAMILLE L. GAIROARD, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Submitted May 31, 1941 —
Decided October 20, 1941.
For the appellant, Leo J. Martini (William P. Gannon, of counsel).
For the respondent, Edward B. McGlynn.

Opinion:
Pee Curiam.
Save as presently stated, the judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the memorandum delivered by Circuit Court Judge Ackerson.
In reaching the stated result, we do not, under the circumstances exhibited, find it necessary to express, and we do not express, any opinion as to whether respondent did or did not have the right to pay the full purchase price ($25,000) for the stock at any time he elected without waiting to pay it, as provided, in installments, or whether respondent did or did not have the right (had he asserted it) to accelerate the payment of the agreed installments of the purchase price.
Judgment is affirmed, with costs.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Pebskie, Porter, Colie, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 16.
For reversal — None.