Case Name: SACRAMENTO SUBURBAN FRUIT LANDS COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, v. Julius I. HAUGEN and Ole Haugen, Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1929-12-17
Citations: 36 F.2d 948
Docket Number: No. 5720
Parties: SACRAMENTO SUBURBAN FRUIT LANDS COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, v. Julius I. HAUGEN and Ole Haugen, Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 36
Pages: 948–948

Head Matter:
SACRAMENTO SUBURBAN FRUIT LANDS COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, v. Julius I. HAUGEN and Ole Haugen, Appellees.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
December 17, 1929.
Motion for Modification of Opinion Denied January 13, 1930.
No. 5720.
Butler, Van Dyke & Desmond, of Sacramento, Cal., and Edward P. Kelly, of Minneapolis, Minn., for appellant.
Ralph H. Lewis and George E. McCutchen, both of Sacramento, Cal., for appellees.
Before RUDKIN, DIETRICH, and WILBUR, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.
This is one of the Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Company eases.
The charge to the jury covers 20 pages of the printed transcript, and the major portion thereof, approximately 16 pages, is given to a discussion of the testimony. The comment and argument therein contained are of such character as to bring it within the condemnation of the rule recognized in our decision in Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co. v. Parker (No. 5680) 36 F.(2d) 926, another case in the same group this day decided.
Accordingly the judgment will be reversed.