Case Name: Luther B. JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Terry HENSLEY et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1973-09-07
Citations: 484 F.2d 992
Docket Number: No. 73-2084
Parties: Luther B. JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Terry HENSLEY et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 484
Pages: 992–992

Head Matter:
Luther B. JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Terry HENSLEY et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 73-2084.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Sept. 7, 1973.
Luther B. Jackson, pro se.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Fla., for defendants-appellees.
Before THORNBERRY, GOLDBERG and RONEY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
It is hereby ordered that the above styled and numbered appeal be dismissed for want of prosecution in view of the appellant's failure to file a brief within the time fixed by the rules. Rule 9(b). See Tidwell v. Dees, 5th Cir. 1972, 464 F.2d 1297.
. It is appropriate to dispose of this pro se case summarily, pursuant to this Court's Local Rule 9(c)(2), appellant having failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Kimbrough v. Beto, Director, 5th Cir. 1969, 412 F.2d 981.