Case Name: Farrell G. JONES, etc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. James L. SPARKMAN and General Motors Corporation, Defendants-Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1996-04-02
Citations: 922 S.W.2d 816
Docket Number: No. 67178
Parties: Farrell G. JONES, etc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. James L. SPARKMAN and General Motors Corporation, Defendants-Respondents.
Judges: Before CRAHAN, P.J., and DOWD and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 922
Pages: 816–816

Head Matter:
Farrell G. JONES, etc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. James L. SPARKMAN and General Motors Corporation, Defendants-Respondents.
No. 67178.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
April 2, 1996.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 6,1996.
Application to Transfer Denied June 25,1996.
Ernest L. Keathley, Jr., Florissant, for appellants.
Samel T. Vandover, St. Louis, for Spark-man.
Peter B. Hoffman, St. Louis, for General Motors.
Rodney E. Loomer, Wallace S. Squibb, Springfield, for General Motors.
Before CRAHAN, P.J., and DOWD and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff Farrell G. Jones (Jones) appeals the directed verdict entered in favor of defendant General Motors Corporation and also appeals the judgment entered upon the jury verdict in favor of defendant James L. Sparkman. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).