Case Name: TILLERY v. STATE
Court: Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jurisdiction: Maryland
Decision Date: 1964-10-15
Citations: 236 Md. 614
Docket Number: No. 26
Parties: TILLERY v. STATE
Judges: 
Reporter: Maryland Reports
Volume: 236
Pages: 614–615

Head Matter:
TILLERY v. STATE
[No. 26,
September Term, 1964.]
Decided October 15, 1964.
The cause was submitted on the brief to Henderson, C. J., and Hammond, Prescott, Horney and Marbury, JJ.
Submitted by Howard J. Goren for appellant.
Submitted by Thomas B. Finan, Attorney General, Franklin Goldstein, Assistant Attorney General, William J. O’Donnell and Donald Needle, State’s Attorney and Assistant State’s Attorney, respectively, for Baltimore City, for appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The appellant was convicted of robbery with a deadly weapon, and contends that the evidence was insufficient. The case re solves itself into a question of credibility as between the alleged victim and the appellant. On the record we cannot find that the trial court was clearly wrong.
Judgment affirmed.