Case Name: Theodore FLAX, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Molly K. FLAX, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1990-09-18
Citations: 796 S.W.2d 84
Docket Number: No. 57209
Parties: Theodore FLAX, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Molly K. FLAX, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 796
Pages: 84–84

Head Matter:
Theodore FLAX, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Molly K. FLAX, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 57209.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, District Three.
Sept. 18, 1990.
Shaw, Howlett & Knappenberger, Clayton, for defendant-appellant.
Mary Ann Weems, Clayton, for plaintiff-respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from the court's judgment in a dissolution case. The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).