Case Name: Robert Michael MALTZMAN et al., Appellants, v. Richard PICKETT, et ux., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1980-01-22
Citations: 378 So. 2d 1344
Docket Number: No. 78-1486
Parties: Robert Michael MALTZMAN et al., Appellants, v. Richard PICKETT, et ux., Appellees.
Judges: Before PEARSON and SCHWARTZ, JJ., and EZELL, BOYCE F., Jr. (Ret.), Associate Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 378
Pages: 1344–1344

Head Matter:
Robert Michael MALTZMAN et al., Appellants, v. Richard PICKETT, et ux., Appellees.
No. 78-1486.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan. 22, 1980.
Adams & Ward and Amy Shield Levine, Horton, Perse & Ginsberg and Arnold R. Ginsberg, Hawkesworth & Schmick, Miami, for appellants.
Greene & Cooper and Sharon L. Wolfe, Sams, Gerstein & Ward, Miami, for appel-lees.
Before PEARSON and SCHWARTZ, JJ., and EZELL, BOYCE F., Jr. (Ret.), Associate Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from an order for a new trial entered upon the plaintiffs' motion. We have reviewed the order appealed, the record, the grounds assigned (in light of the arguments presented), the holdings of the Supreme Court in Castlewood International Corporation v. La Fleur, 322 So.2d 520 (Fla.1975), and we find no clear abuse of discretion has been shown.
Affirmed.