Case Name: Donald J. DUCHESS and Catherine A. Duchess, Respondents, v. LANGSTON CORPORATION, Petitioner
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1999-05-07
Citations: 556 Pa. 435
Docket Number: Petition No. 410 W.D. Alloc. Dkt. 1998
Parties: Donald J. DUCHESS and Catherine A. Duchess, Respondents, v. LANGSTON CORPORATION, Petitioner.
Judges: 
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 556
Pages: 435–435

Head Matter:
729 A.2d 69
Donald J. DUCHESS and Catherine A. Duchess, Respondents, v. LANGSTON CORPORATION, Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
May 7, 1999.
Joseph J. Bosick, Pittsburgh, for petitioner.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
AND NOW, this 7 th day of May, 1999, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED limited to the following issue:
Did the Superior Court err in reversing judgment in favor of Petitioner finding that evidence of a subsequent design change was admissible as a subsequent repair as opposed to a subsequent remedial measure?