Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Marc LEE, Defendant-Appellant; Marc LEE, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent-Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1997-03-11
Citations: 941 S.W.2d 714
Docket Number: Nos. 69694, 71060
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Marc LEE, Defendant-Appellant. Marc LEE, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent-Respondent.
Judges: Before DOWD, P.J., and REINBARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 941
Pages: 714–714

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Marc LEE, Defendant-Appellant. Marc LEE, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent-Respondent.
Nos. 69694, 71060.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
March 11, 1997.
Emmett D. Queener, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for movant-appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jacqueline K. Hamra, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent-respondent.
Before DOWD, P.J., and REINBARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals the judgment upon his conviction by a jury of one count of stealing, third offense, § 570.040, RSMo 1994, for which he was sentenced to a term of eight years' imprisonment as a prior and persistent offender. Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgments are affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).