Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Emerson Waddell SARTOR, II, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-09-03
Citations: 332 F. App'x 29
Docket Number: No. 09-7182
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Emerson Waddell SARTOR, II, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 332
Pages: 29–29

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Emerson Waddell SARTOR, II, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-7182.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 26, 2009.
Decided: Sept. 3, 2009.
Emerson Waddell Sartor, II, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appel-lee.
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Emerson Waddell Sartor, II, appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a reduced sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Sartor, No. 7:05-cr-00128-H-1 (E.D.N.C. May 29, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.