Case Name: BRUNSWICK SEAFOOD, INC. d/b/a Dularge Seafood Processing and Lenue Green v. WILLIAMS LAW GROUP, LLC; Smitko Law, A Professional Law Corporation; The Law Offices of Jerri G. Smitko, APLC ; Naquin & Carmouche, LLC ; Naquin Law Firm, LLC ; John J. Bean CPA, Inc. ; Conrad S.P. Williams; David Ardoin; Matthew D. Ory; Jerri G. Smitko ; Catherine Gauthier and John J. Bean
Court: Louisiana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 2019-04-29
Citations: 268 So. 3d 1022
Docket Number: NO. 2019-C-0335
Parties: BRUNSWICK SEAFOOD, INC. d/b/a Dularge Seafood Processing and Lenue Green
v.
WILLIAMS LAW GROUP, LLC; Smitko Law, A Professional Law Corporation; The Law Offices of Jerri G. Smitko, APLC ; Naquin & Carmouche, LLC ; Naquin Law Firm, LLC ; John J. Bean CPA, Inc. ; Conrad S.P. Williams; David Ardoin; Matthew D. Ory; Jerri G. Smitko ; Catherine Gauthier and John J. Bean
Judges: 
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 268
Pages: 1022–1023

Head Matter:
BRUNSWICK SEAFOOD, INC. d/b/a Dularge Seafood Processing and Lenue Green
v.
WILLIAMS LAW GROUP, LLC; Smitko Law, A Professional Law Corporation; The Law Offices of Jerri G. Smitko, APLC ; Naquin & Carmouche, LLC ; Naquin Law Firm, LLC ; John J. Bean CPA, Inc. ; Conrad S.P. Williams; David Ardoin; Matthew D. Ory; Jerri G. Smitko ; Catherine Gauthier and John J. Bean
NO. 2019-C-0335
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
April 29, 2019
Writ denied.

Opinion:
JOHNSON, C.J., would grant.
HUGHES, J., would grant.
GENOVESE, J., would grant and assigns reasons.
GENOVESE, J., would grant this writ for the following reasons:
This is a summary judgment legal malpractice case. Both sides have competing, contradictory, and irreconcilable expert opinions and reports. When there are two competing experts with opposing views, the fact finder must make the determination as to whom to rely upon. This requires a review and weighing of the facts and evidence presented. A trial court judge is not permitted to weigh evidence or judge credibility in a summary judgment proceeding. That is precisely what occurred in this case. There are genuine issues of material fact presented which prohibit the grant of summary judgment. I would grant this writ, reverse the lower courts' grant of summary judgment, deny defendants' motion for summary judgment, and remand for further proceedings.