Case Name: Aubrey Barker FUNCHESS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1998-02-17
Citations: 705 So. 2d 713
Docket Number: No. 96-3023
Parties: Aubrey Barker FUNCHESS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: MINER and WOLF, JJ„ and SHIVERS, Senior Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 705
Pages: 713–714

Head Matter:
Aubrey Barker FUNCHESS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 96-3023.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Feb. 17, 1998.
Nancy Daniels, Public Defender, and Fred Parker Bingham II, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Robert Butterworth, Attorney General, and James W. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Following a jury trial, appellant, Aubrey Funchess (Funchess) was convicted of manslaughter. The Public Defender filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Funchess waived his right to file a pro se brief. We have reviewed the record and agree with the Public Defender that no good faith argument can be made that reversible error occurred in the trial court. Accordingly, Funchess' convictions and sentences are affirmed. However, as pointed out by the Public Defender, the civil judgment of restitution was entered after the notice of appeal had divested the trial court of jurisdiction, and therefore that civil judgment imposing restitution is vacated. See, e.g., Prance v. State, 702 So.2d 627 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); M.C.L. v. State, 682 So.2d 1209 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). On remand, the trial court may again impose the restitution, following the proper procedures concerning notice and proofs, should the state demonstrate that its right to restitution has been preserved. See, e.g., Hummell v. State, 693 So.2d 113 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997).
MINER and WOLF, JJ" and SHIVERS, Senior Judge, concur.