Case Name: Roger C. MYERS, d/b/a Romyco Stereo, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMPEX, INC., et al., DefendantsAppellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1974-08-21
Citations: 498 F.2d 1092
Docket Number: No. 73-3510
Parties: Roger C. MYERS, d/b/a Romyco Stereo, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMPEX, INC., et al., DefendantsAppellees.
Judges: Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and THORNBERRY and AINSWORTH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 498
Pages: 1092–1093

Head Matter:
Roger C. MYERS, d/b/a Romyco Stereo, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMPEX, INC., et al., DefendantsAppellees.
No. 73-3510
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 21, 1974.
Roger C. Myers, pro se.
Stanley McMurry, Dallas, Tex., for Cap. Records. '
James W. Mehaffy, Beaumont, Tex., for Columbia.
R. Daniel Settle, Fort Worth, Tex., for RCA.
J. Hoke Peacock, II, Beaumont, Tex., for Harry Fox Agency, Inc.
John F. Still, pro se.
Joseph Bonner, Nowata, Okl., for other defendants-appellees.
Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and THORNBERRY and AINSWORTH, Circuit Judges.
Rule 18, 5th. Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Pursuant to our remand, the district court for the Eastern Disrict of Texas has examined Appellant's complaint in his action before the district court for the Western District of Oklahoma. The district court for the Eastern District of Texas again concluded that Appellant's claim was identical to that dismissed in the Western District of Oklahoma. We affirm, concluding that the doctrine of direct estoppel bars the claim.
. Myers v. Ampex, Inc., 491 F.2d 1103 (5th Cir. 1974).
. See Estevez v. Nabers, 219 F.2d 321 (5th Cir. 1955); 9 Wright & Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure: Civil § 2373, at 238-39.