Case Name: Carl Eugene WATTS, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Harry K. SINGLETARY, Respondent-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1996-12-19
Citations: 102 F.3d 1119
Docket Number: No. 95-4403
Parties: Carl Eugene WATTS, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Harry K. SINGLETARY, Respondent-Appellant.
Judges: Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, KRAVITCH, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 102
Pages: 1119–1120

Head Matter:
Carl Eugene WATTS, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Harry K. SINGLETARY, Respondent-Appellant.
No. 95-4403.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Dec. 19, 1996.
Joan L. Greenberg, Asst. Attorney General, West Palm Beach, FL, for Respondent-Appellant.
Helen C. Trainor, Asst. Federal Public Defender, Miami, FL, for Petitioner-Appel-lee.

Opinion:
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, KRAVITCH, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The Court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the Court and a majority of the Circuit Judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor of it (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Eleventh Circuit Rule 35-5), the Suggestion of Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.