Case Name: HAMILTON v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1917-10-31
Citations: 198 S.W. 291
Docket Number: No. 4651
Parties: HAMILTON v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 198
Pages: 291–291

Head Matter:
HAMILTON v. STATE.
(No. 4651.)
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Oct. 31, 1917.)
Criminal Law <§=>1090(1) — Appea]>-Bill oe Exceptions — Statement oe Facts — Necessity.
Where the indictment is apparently regular, there is nothing to review in the absence of a statement of facts, or bills of exceptions.
Appeal from Criminal District Court, Williamson County; James R. Hamilton, Judge.
Joe Hamilton was convicted of robbery, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
E. B. Hendricks, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Opinion:
MORROW, J.
The conviction under the indictment is for robbery, and penalty fixed at confinement in the state penitentiary for seven years.
The indictment appears regular, and ih the absence of statement of facts or bills of exceptions we find nothing to review.
The judgment is affirmed.