Case Name: STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent, v. DORA FLEMING, Appellant
Court: St. Louis Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1910-06-28
Citations: 150 Mo. App. 87
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent, v. DORA FLEMING, Appellant.
Judges: All concur.
Reporter: Missouri Appeal Reports
Volume: 150
Pages: 87–87

Head Matter:
STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent, v. DORA FLEMING, Appellant.
St. Louis Court of Appeals,
June 28, 1910.
APPELLATE PRACTICE: No Bill of Exceptions: Criminal Procedure. Where, in a criminal case, no bill of exceptions is filed, and the record proper is free from error, the judgment will be affirmed.
Appeal from St. Louis Court of Criminal Correction.— Hon. Wilson A.- Taylor, Judge.
Affirmed.
John Gernes- for appellant.
Elliott W. Major, Attorney-General, and John M. Atkinson, Assistant Attorney-General, for respondent.
There is nothing before this court but the record proper, and no error appearing therein, the judgment should be affirmed. State v. Nicholas, 193 Mo. 214; State v. Sparks, 191 Mo. 162.

Opinion:
GOODE, J.
This defendant was convicted of unlawfully selling a certain ticket or part of a ticket in a lottery or device in the nature of a lottery, known as a policy. No bill of exceptions was filed and there is before ns only the record proper. The information follows the statute and is according to the. form laid down in Sherwood's Criminal Law, page 674. Defendant was duly arraigned and pleaded "not guilty;" whereupon there was a trial before the court, a finding that the defendant was guilty as charged and a- judgment sentencing him to pay a fine of two hundred dollars. Finding no error in the record the judgment is affirmed.
All concur.