Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Derck GILLIS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-12-29
Citations: 117 F. App'x 295
Docket Number: No. 04-4548
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Derck GILLIS, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 117
Pages: 295–296

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Derck GILLIS, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 04-4548.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 10, 2004.
Decided Dec. 29, 2004.
Alan H. Yamamoto, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney, Avner Shapiro, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Derek Gillis appeals from the revocation of his supervised release. His sole issue on appeal is that there was insufficient evidence to support the district court's finding that he possessed marijuana with the intent to distribute it. We do not find that the district court abused its discretion by finding that Gillis violated his supervised release in this manner. United States v. Copley, 978 F.2d 829, 831 (4th Cir.1992). This court does not review credibility determinations on appeal. United States v. Burgos, 94 F.3d 849, 863 (4th Cir.1996). Accordingly, we affirm Gillis' conviction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED