Case Name: Baird et al. v. Bate
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1902-10-30
Citations: 116 Ga. 439
Docket Number: 
Parties: Baird et al. v. Bate.
Judges: All the Justices concurring, except Lumpkin, P. J., absent.
Reporter: Georgia Reports
Volume: 116
Pages: 439–439

Head Matter:
Baird et al. v. Bate.
Argued October 9,
Decided October 30, 1902.
Equitable petition. Before Judge Gober. Cobb superior court. May 5, 1902.
Sessions & Moss, for plaintiffs in error.
B. W. Blair andR. T. Prey, contra.

Opinion:
Eish, J.
There was no error in admitting or rejecting evidence ; the alleged newly discovered evidence could have been discovered by the exercise of ordinary diligence ; the charges complained of were substantially correct ; and the evidence warranted the verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concurring, except Lumpkin, P. J., absent.