Case Name: William A. BORDERS, Jr., Commissioner, District of Columbia Judicial Nomination Commission, v. Ronald REAGAN, President, United States of America, et al., Appellants, Government of the District of Columbia and District of Columbia Judicial Nomination Commission
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1982-04-27
Citations: 732 F.2d 181
Docket Number: No. 81-1998
Parties: William A. BORDERS, Jr., Commissioner, District of Columbia Judicial Nomination Commission, v. Ronald REAGAN, President, United States of America, et al., Appellants, Government of the District of Columbia and District of Columbia Judicial Nomination Commission.
Judges: Before MacKINNON, ROBB and WALD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 732
Pages: 181–181

Head Matter:
William A. BORDERS, Jr., Commissioner, District of Columbia Judicial Nomination Commission, v. Ronald REAGAN, President, United States of America, et al., Appellants, Government of the District of Columbia and District of Columbia Judicial Nomination Commission.
No. 81-1998.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
April 27, 1982.
Ordered Published March 27, 1984.
Robert E. Kopp, Alfred R. Mollin and William Kanter, Attys., U.S. Dept, of Justice, and Charles F.C. Ruff, U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., for appellants.
Frederick B. Abramson, Washington, D.C., for appellee District of Columbia Judicial Nomination Com’n.
Dudley R. Williams and Herbert O. Reid, Sr., Washington, D.C., for appellee William A. Borders, Jr.
Judith W. Rogers, Corp. Counsel, Charles L. Reischel, Lutz Alexander Prager and Michael E. Zielinski, Asst. Corp. Counsel, Washington, D.C., for appellee District of Columbia.
Before MacKINNON, ROBB and WALD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
On consideration of the motion of the federal appellants to vacate and remand, it is
ORDERED by the Court that the aforesaid motion is granted and the order of the District Court, 518 F.Supp. 250, of July 7, 1981 is vacated and, it is
FURTHER ORDERED by the Court that this case is remanded to the District Court with direction to dismiss the complaint as moot. See United States v. Munsingwear, 340 U.S. 36, 39, 71 S.Ct. 104, 106, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).