Case Name: John E. Stowell et al., Respondents, v. Milton Clark et al., as Attorneys in Fact of the Brewers and Maltsters Fire Insurance Underwriters at the Central Lloyds et al., Appellants
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1902-06-10
Citations: 171 N.Y. 673
Docket Number: 
Parties: John E. Stowell et al., Respondents, v. Milton Clark et al., as Attorneys in Fact of the Brewers and Maltsters Fire Insurance Underwriters at the Central Lloyds et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 171
Pages: 673–673

Head Matter:
John E. Stowell et al., Respondents, v. Milton Clark et al., as Attorneys in Fact of the Brewers and Maltsters Fire Insurance Underwriters at the Central Lloyds et al., Appellants.
Stowell v. Clark, 47 App. Div. 626, affirmed.
(Argued May 28, 1902;
decided June 10, 1902.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered April 7, 1900, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury.
M. E. Priscoll for appellants.
A. J. McCrary, Alex Cumming and A. W. Cumming for respondents.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.