Case Name: In the Matter of Countrywide Insurance Company, Appellant, v. DHD Medical, P.C., Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2011-07-07
Citations: 86 A.D.3d 431
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Countrywide Insurance Company, Appellant, v DHD Medical, P.C., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 86
Pages: 431–431

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Countrywide Insurance Company, Appellant, v DHD Medical, P.C., Respondent.
[926 NYS2d 293]

Opinion:
Petitioner argues that respondent is a fraudulently incorporated medical services provider and therefore is not only ineligible for reimbursement of no-fault payments (see State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v Mallela, 4 NY3d 313 [2005]) but is also precluded from demanding arbitration pursuant to Insurance Law § 5106 (b) (and the no-fault policy issued by petitioner). Contrary to this argument, the defense of fraudulent incorporation is "for the arbitrator and not for the courts" (see Matter of Nassau Ins. Co. v McMorris, 41 NY2d 701, 701 [1977]; Matter of MVAIC v Interboro Med. Care & Diagnostic PC, 73 AD3d 667 [2010]). Indeed, it has been the subject of numerous arbitration proceedings (see e.g. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v Kissena Med. Imaging, P.C., 25 Misc 3d 1214[A], 2009 NY Slip Op 52094[U] [2009]; Uptodate Med. Serv., P.C. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 22 Misc 3d 128[A], 2009 NY Slip Op 50046[U], *2 [2009]).
We have considered plaintiffs remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Andrias, J.P., Sweeny, Renwick, Freedman and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.