Case Name: Dadly TILUS, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-03-17
Citations: 317 F. App'x 382
Docket Number: No. 08-1907
Parties: Dadly TILUS, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 317
Pages: 382–383

Head Matter:
Dadly TILUS, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 08-1907.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 23, 2009.
Decided: March 17, 2009.
Edward Dosa-Wea Neufville, III, Mo-raisneufville Law Firm, LLC, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Gregory G. Katsas, Assistant Attorney General, Ernesto H. Molina, Jr., Assistant Director, Jeffery R. Leist, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Dadly Tilus, a native and citizen of Haiti, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("Board") denying his motion to reconsider its prior order, which denied Tilus' motion to remand his case to the immigration judge. We have reviewed the record and the Board's order, and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reconsider. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2008); Jean v. Gonzales, 435 F.3d 475, 481 (4th Cir.2006). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Tilus (B.I.A. July 18, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.