Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan CAZARES-CAMARILLO, also known as Juan Camarillo-Cazares, also known as Juan Camarillo-Cook, also known as Juan Mendez-Perez, also known as Juan Mendez-Gonzalez, also known as Juan Garcia-Gomez, also known as Juan Perez Mendez, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-01-30
Citations: 263 F. App'x 442
Docket Number: No. 07-50962
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan CAZARES-CAMARILLO, also known as Juan Camarillo-Cazares, also known as Juan Camarillo-Cook, also known as Juan Mendez-Perez, also known as Juan Mendez-Gonzalez, also known as Juan Garcia-Gomez, also known as Juan Perez Mendez, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 263
Pages: 442–442

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan CAZARES-CAMARILLO, also known as Juan Camarillo-Cazares, also known as Juan Camarillo-Cook, also known as Juan Mendez-Perez, also known as Juan Mendez-Gonzalez, also known as Juan Garcia-Gomez, also known as Juan Perez Mendez, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-50962
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Jan. 30, 2008.
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before REAVLEY, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Juan Cazares-Camarillo raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir.2007), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 128 S.Ct. 872, 169 L.Ed.2d 737 (2008). The Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.