Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. VINCENT ANTHONY MONACO, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2001-08-29
Citations: 176 Or. App. 349
Docket Number: 99CR1534; A108488
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. VINCENT ANTHONY MONACO, Appellant.
Judges: Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Armstrong and Kistler, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 176
Pages: 349–350

Head Matter:
Submitted on record and briefs July 6,
sentences vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed August 29, 2001
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. VINCENT ANTHONY MONACO, Appellant.
99CR1534; A108488
30 P3d 1229
Jennelle Hall, Deputy Public Defender, filed the brief for appellant. With her on the brief was David E. Groom, Public Defender.
Kathleen Cegla, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.
Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Armstrong and Kistler, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant appeals his convictions for several drug-related offenses. He assigns error only to the trial court's imposition of 42 months' probation on count 4, to run consecutively to a prison and post-prison supervision term on a different count. The state concedes that that was error, and we agree. A consecutive probationary sentence is subsumed in a previous sentence that includes post-prison supervision. State v. Dummitt, 115 Or App 487, 839 P2d 246 (1992). We vacate the sentences and remand for resentencing. ORS 138.222(5); State v. Hagan, 140 Or App 454, 916 P2d 317 (1996).
Sentences vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.