Case Name: Helen C. Johnson et al. v. Arthur Star
Court: Supreme Court of Texas
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1932-03-23
Citations: 121 Tex. 195
Docket Number: Application No. 18,589
Parties: Helen C. Johnson et al. v. Arthur Star.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Reports
Volume: 121
Pages: 195–196

Head Matter:
Helen C. Johnson et al. v. Arthur Star.
Application No. 18,589.
Decided March 23, 1932.
(47 S. W., 2d Series, 608.)
C. Huggins and Webb & Webb, of Sherman, and Fred J. Dudley, of Dallas, for plaintiffs in error.
William Endress, Jr., and Renfro, Ledbetter & McCombs, all of Dallas, for defendants in error.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals for the Fifth District in this case is in conflict with that of the Court of Civil Appeals for the Sixth District in the case of Johnson v. Chapman Milling Co., 37 S. W. (2d) 776.. We are convinced, however, that the opinion of the first named court in the instant case is correct, and that the questions at issue have been definitely settled by this court in the cases of Patty- Joiner v. Cummins, 93 Texas, 598, 57 S. W., 566, and Haijek v. Luck, 96 Texas, 517, 74 S. W., 305. We accordingly refuse the application for writ of error.