Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John Canal, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2005-12-22
Citations: 24 A.D.3d 1034
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Canal, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 24
Pages: 1034–1035

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Canal, Appellant.
[805 NYS2d 731]

Opinion:
Crew III, J.E
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Lamont, J.), rendered August 1, 2003 in Albany County, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree.
Defendant was observed on Dana Avenue in the City of Albany drinking beer from a bottle. He was arrested for violating the City of Albany's open container ordinance, and a subsequent search of his person revealed nine pieces of crack cocaine. As a consequence, defendant was indicted and charged with criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third and fifth degrees. Following a Dunaway/Mapp hearing, where defendant unsuccessfully sought to suppress the cocaine, he pleaded guilty to criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree and was sentenced, as a second felony offender, to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of SVa to 7 years. Defendant now appeals.
We affirm. Contrary to defendant's assertion, where, as here, the police arrest a person for an offense committed in their presence, they are justified in conducting a search incident to that arrest (see People v Pantusco, 107 AD2d 854, 855-856 [1985] [search incident to arrest for violation of open container ordinance]).
Peters, Spain and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.