Case Name: Hill et al. v. Lundy
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1903-05-30
Citations: 118 Ga. 93
Docket Number: 
Parties: Hill et al. v. Lundy.
Judges: By five Justices.
Reporter: Georgia Reports
Volume: 118
Pages: 93–93

Head Matter:
Hill et al. v. Lundy.
Submitted May 6, —
Decided May 30, 1903.
Appeal. Before Judge Holden. Hancock superior court. November 22, 1902.
Hunt & Merritt, for plaintiffs in error.
B. H. Lewis, contra,

Opinion:
Candler, J.
1. It is not a proper ground of a motion for a new trial that the judge of the superior court, on the trial of an appeal from a county court, refused, on motion, to dismiss the appeal, or to dismiss the petition of one of the parties thereto. The error, if any, should he made the subject of a direct exception. Heery v. Burkhalter, 113 Ga. 1043, and cases cited.
2. The verdict was supported by the evidence, and it was not erroneous to overrule the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
By five Justices.