Case Name: Raymond J. NIXON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2016-02-16
Citations: 482 S.W.3d 466
Docket Number: No. ED 103109
Parties: Raymond J. NIXON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Roy L. Richter, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 482
Pages: 466–467

Head Matter:
Raymond J. NIXON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 103109
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
FILED: February 16, 2016
Erika Renee Eliason, 1000 W. Nifong, Bldg. 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203, ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Colette Elaine Neuner, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102; ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT
Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Roy L. Richter, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Raymond J. Nixon appeals from the motion court's entry of judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his amend ed Rule 24.035 Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal 'file, and the record on appeal and find the claim of error' to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting1 the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).