Case Name: Leroy BARBER, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, Clark & Clark and the Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1964-07-10
Citations: 166 So. 2d 142
Docket Number: No. 33075
Parties: Leroy BARBER, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, Clark & Clark and the Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, Respondents.
Judges: DREW, C. J., and ROBERTS, THOR-NAL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 166
Pages: 142–142

Head Matter:
Leroy BARBER, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, Clark & Clark and the Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, Respondents.
No. 33075.
Supreme Court of Florida.
July 10, 1964.
James T. Earle and Masterson & Lloyd, St. Petersburg, for petitioner.
E. O. Palermo of Shackleford, Farrior, Stallings, Glos & Evans, Tampa, for Qark and Clark and The Fidelity and Casualty Co. of New York.
Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for Florida Industrial Commission.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Upon a consideration of the record, briefs and after oral argument, we have concluded that the Florida Industrial Commission committed no- error in remanding the matter to the Deputy Commissioner for a reexamination of the extent of the petitioner's permanent disability. The writ of certiorari is, therefore, denied.
It is so ordered.
DREW, C. J., and ROBERTS, THOR-NAL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.