Case Name: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Slodov
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1996-02-28
Citations: 74 Ohio St. 3d 618
Docket Number: No. 95-2176
Parties: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Slodov.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 74
Pages: 618–623

Head Matter:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Slodov.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Slodov (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 618.]
(No. 95-2176
Submitted December 6, 1995
Decided February 28, 1996.)
Geoffrey Stem, Disciplinary Counsel, and Alvin E. Mathews, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.
Michael D. Slodov, pro se.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Upon review of the record, we concur in the board's findings of misconduct and recommended sanction. Respondent is therefore publicly reprimanded for his violations of DR 7-109(B) and 1-102(A)(5) and (6). Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.