Case Name: JOZU ENTERPRISES, INC., Appellant, v. Guillermo MULLER, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1981-07-07
Citations: 400 So. 2d 831
Docket Number: No. 80-2276
Parties: JOZU ENTERPRISES, INC., Appellant, v. Guillermo MULLER, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, NESBITT and BASKIN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 400
Pages: 831–831

Head Matter:
JOZU ENTERPRISES, INC., Appellant, v. Guillermo MULLER, Appellee.
No. 80-2276.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 7, 1981.
Kaplan & Rapoport, Miami, for appellant.
Steven R. Berger, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, NESBITT and BASKIN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the order of the trial court denying defendant's motion for relief from judgment presented pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b)(4) on the ground that the judgment was void because it affirmatively appears that the allegations in the ad damnum clause were insufficient to confer jurisdiction on the circuit court to enter a judgment of possession. § 34.-011(1), Fla.Stat. (1979); Williams v. Gund, 334 So.2d 314 (Fla.2d DCA 1976); Fla.R. Civ.P. 1.110(b)(1).