Case Name: PAUL B. SCARF, PLAINTIFF, v. LUDWIG FANTON AND HENRY WOLF, CO-PARTNERS, TRADING AS FANTON & WOLF, DEFENDANTS
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1926-07-09
Citations: 4 N.J. Misc. 636
Docket Number: 
Parties: PAUL B. SCARF, PLAINTIFF, v. LUDWIG FANTON AND HENRY WOLF, CO-PARTNERS, TRADING AS FANTON & WOLF, DEFENDANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 4
Pages: 636–636

Head Matter:
PAUL B. SCARF, PLAINTIFF, v. LUDWIG FANTON AND HENRY WOLF, CO-PARTNERS, TRADING AS FANTON & WOLF, DEFENDANTS.
Decided July 9, 1926.
Before Justice Kalisch, at chambers.
For the motion, Lionel P. Kristeller.
Contra, William B. Stites.

Opinion:
Pee Ctjbiam.
The .plaintiff's action is for rent. The defendant sets up a counter-claim for unliquidated damages. The ease is controlled by Kelly v. Faitoute Iron and Steel Co., 87 N. J. L. 567; Jenkins v. Schneidman, 4 N. J. Adv. R. 1005. The plaintiff's motion to strike out the counter-claim is allowed.