Case Name: Thomas Charles KLEVE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. D.R. HILL, Warden CCI; J. Gomez; Attorney General of the State of California; Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2000-01-25
Citations: 202 F.3d 1155
Docket Number: No. 97-56182
Parties: Thomas Charles KLEVE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. D.R. HILL, Warden CCI; J. Gomez; Attorney General of the State of California; Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: Before: D.W. NELSON, FERNANDEZ, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 202
Pages: 1155–1160

Head Matter:
Thomas Charles KLEVE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. D.R. HILL, Warden CCI; J. Gomez; Attorney General of the State of California; Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 97-56182.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Order and Dissent Filed Jan. 21, 2000.
Order Filed Jan. 25, 2000.
Before: D.W. NELSON, FERNANDEZ, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
The ORDER DENYING REHEARING with DISSENT, filed January 21, 2000, is hereby redesignated FOR PUBLICATION.
ORDER DENYING REHEARING
The panel, as constituted above, has voted as follows: Judges Fernandez and W. Fletcher voted to deny the petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc; Judge D.W. Nelson voted to grant the petition for rehearing and recommended granting the petition for rehearing en banc.
A judge of the court called for a vote on the petition for rehearing en banc. A vote was taken, and a majority of the active judges of the court failed to vote for en banc rehearing. Fed. R.App. P. 35(f).
The petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED.