Case Name: COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Decision Date: 1988-04-22
Citations: 269 U.S. App. D.C. 261
Docket Number: Nos. 85-1846, 85-1847, 86-1021, 86-1074, 86-1082, 86-1164 and 86-1187
Parties: COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent.
Judges: Before BUCKLEY and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and GESELL, U.S. District Judge for the District of Columbia.
Reporter: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Volume: 269
Pages: 261–262

Head Matter:
844 F.2d 879
COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent.
Nos. 85-1846, 85-1847, 86-1021, 86-1074, 86-1082, 86-1164 and 86-1187.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
April 22, 1988.
Catherine C. Cook, Gen. Counsel, Jerome M. Feit, Sol., and John H. Conway, Atty., F.E.R.C. (“FERC”), Washington, D.C., were on respondent’s petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc and FERC’s supplemental brief in response to court’s February 23, 1988 order.
Raymond N. Shibley and Marlene L. Stein, Washington, D.C., were on the petition for rehearing, and suggestion for rehearing en banc, for intervenors Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. and Trunkline Gas Co. and intervenors’ memorandum brief in response to court’s order.
Thomas F. Ryan, Jr., Robert G. Hardy, and Michael J. Fremuth, Washington, D.C., for Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp., and William Douglas Field, Jr., Owensboro, Ky., for Texas Gas Transmission Corp., were on the petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc and the pipelines’ joint supplemental brief in response to court’s order.
Richard L. Gottlieb, Giles D.H. Snyder, and S.J. Small, Charleston, W.Va., were on the supplemental brief, for petitioner Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.
Charles F. Wheatley, Jr., Annapolis, Md., and Philip B. Malter, Washington, D.C., were on the brief in response to court’s order for Municipal Defense Group.
Before BUCKLEY and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and GESELL, U.S. District Judge for the District of Columbia.
Sitting by designation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 292(a).

Opinion:
Opinion
PER CURIAM.