Case Name: The KEYES CO., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Manuel GOMEZ and M & M Aerospace, Inc., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-11-19
Citations: 590 So. 2d 954
Docket Number: No. 90-2831
Parties: The KEYES CO., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Manuel GOMEZ and M & M Aerospace, Inc., Appellees.
Judges: Before FERGUSON, JORGENSON, and GERSTEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 590
Pages: 954–955

Head Matter:
The KEYES CO., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Manuel GOMEZ and M & M Aerospace, Inc., Appellees.
No. 90-2831.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 19, 1991.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 28, 1992.
Friedlander & Associates, P.A., and Bruce D. Friedlander, Miami, for appellant.
Rodriguez, Benitez & De La Pena, and Emilio Benitez, and Bentata Hoet & Associates, and Zamora Segall Lacasa Schere, and Norman Segall, Miami, for appellees.
Before FERGUSON, JORGENSON, and GERSTEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, the Keyes Co. (Keyes), appeals from a final order confirming an arbitration award in favor of appellee, M & M Aerospace, Inc. (M & M). We affirm.
The standard of judicial review of arbitration awards is extremely limited. Schnurmacher v. Noriega, 542 So.2d 1327 (Fla.1989). An award of arbitration may not be reversed on the ground that an arbitrator made an error of law. Schnurmacher v. Noriega, 542 So.2d at 1329 (citing Cassara v. Wofford, 55 So.2d 102 (Fla 1951)). If the arbitrator is not guilty of acts of misconduct, the award operates as a final and conclusive judgment, and "however disappointing it may be . the parties must abide by it." Schnurmacher v. Noriega, 542 So.2d at 1330.
There is no suggestion that the arbitrator in this case was guilty of any misconduct. Accordingly, the arbitration award is affirmed.
Affirmed.
JORGENSON and GERSTEN, JJ., concur.