Case Name: Ben Oetken, Appellee, v. G. W. Shell and Jack Shell, Appellants
Court: Kansas Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Kansas
Decision Date: 1950-05-06
Citations: 169 Kan. 109
Docket Number: No. 37,669
Parties: Ben Oetken, Appellee, v. G. W. Shell and Jack Shell, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Kansas Reports
Volume: 169
Pages: 109–109

Head Matter:
No. 37,669
Ben Oetken, Appellee, v. G. W. Shell and Jack Shell, Appellants.
(217 P. 2d 906)
Opinion on rehearing filed May 6, 1950.
(For original opinion see 168 Kan. 244, 212 P. 2d 329.)
John A. Etling, of Kinsley, argued the cause, and W. N. Beezley, of Kinsley, and Wm. Easton Hutchison, C. E. Vance, Clifford JR. Hope and A. M. Fleming, all of Garden City, were with him on the briefs for the appellants.
Logan N. Green, of Garden City, argued the cause, and Roland H. Tate and Daniel R. Hopkins, both of Garden City, were with him on the briefs for the appellee.

Opinion:
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Parker, J.:
For what appeared to be good and sufficient cause a rehearing was granted in this case with a request to counsel for the respective parties that they rebrief and orally argue questions raised with respect to the statute of frauds and trusts in lands arising by implication of law. The pertinent facts and issues involved are fully stated in the initial opinion (Oetken v. Shell, 168 Kan. 244, 212 P. 2d 329) and for that reason need not be repeated in this opinion.
The case was rebriefed and has been reargued by counsel as requested.
Upon examination of the additional briefs and careful consideration of all questions orally presented and argued the court has concluded its original opinion should be adhered to.
It is so ordered.