Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Geidy VERJANO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-03-18
Citations: 318 F. App'x 197
Docket Number: No. 09-6098
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Geidy VERJANO, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 318
Pages: 197–198

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Geidy VERJANO, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 09-6098.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 12, 2009.
Decided: March 18, 2009.
Geidy Verjano, Appellant Pro Se. Isaac Louis Johnson, Jr., Office of the United States Attorney, Leesa Washington, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affii’med by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Geidy Verjano appeals the district court's order denying her motion to modify her sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Verjano, No. 6:06-cr-00633-HMH (D.S.C. Jan. 6, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.