Case Name: In the Matter of the Application and Petition of The City of New York, Respondent, to Acquire Certain Real Estate at Mohansic Lake and Little Mohansic Lake, in the Town of Yorktown, Westchester County, New York, under the Greater New York Charter and Pursuant to Chapter 543 of the Laws of 1925, to Be Acquired for the Sanitary Protection of the Water Supply of the City of New York. James J. Mead, Individually and as General Guardian of Eleanor Elizabeth Cornwell, Infant, etc., and Others, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1931-06
Citations: 236 A.D. 694
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Application and Petition of The City of New York, Respondent, to Acquire Certain Real Estate at Mohansic Lake and Little Mohansic Lake, in the Town of Yorktown, Westchester County, New York, under the Greater New York Charter and Pursuant to Chapter 543 of the Laws of 1925, to Be Acquired for the Sanitary Protection of the Water Supply of the City of New York. James J. Mead, Individually and as General Guardian of Eleanor Elizabeth Cornwell, Infant, etc., and Others, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 236
Pages: 694–694

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Application and Petition of The City of New York, Respondent, to Acquire Certain Real Estate at Mohansic Lake and Little Mohansic Lake, in the Town of Yorktown, Westchester County, New York, under the Greater New York Charter and Pursuant to Chapter 543 of the Laws of 1925, to Be Acquired for the Sanitary Protection of the Water Supply of the City of New York. James J. Mead, Individually and as General Guardian of Eleanor Elizabeth Cornwell, Infant, etc., and Others, Appellants.
Amdg. Gen. Mun. Law, § 76.— [Rep.

Opinion:
Order of the Special Term in so far as appealed from reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, and the matter remitted to the Special Term to pass upon the propriety of the awards of the commissioners for parcel F, made on the theory that the claimants own the land under water. The deed (Exhibit C) vests in the claimants the title not only to the uplands but to the land in the bed of the lake perforce the language therein which conforms the description in that deed to the description of the corresponding parcel contained in the deed of April 4, 1814 — Exhibit T. (Matter of City of N. Y. [W. 10th St. R. Corp.], 256 N. Y. 222, 226, 227; Butler v. Clark, 66 Hun, 444.) This view is reinforced by the later reference in the appurtenance clause to the " above described premises," which reference concerned not only the description by metes and bounds but also included the reference to the 1814 deed and the particular description contained therein. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ., concur.