Case Name: Timothy LUMPKIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1998-09-09
Citations: 717 So. 2d 122
Docket Number: No. 97-2094
Parties: Timothy LUMPKIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: GUNTHER and GROSS, JJ., and GLICKSTEIN, HUGH S., Senior Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 717
Pages: 122–123

Head Matter:
Timothy LUMPKIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 97-2094.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Sept. 9, 1998.
Richard L. Jorandby, Pubhc Defender, and Bernard S. Fernandez, Assistant Pubhc Defender, West Palm Beach, and Timothy Lumpkin, Milton, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Georgina Jimenez-Orosa, West Palm Beach, and Terri Leon-Benner, Fort Lauderdale, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
While there is no arguable error in the adjudication and sentence of appellant, a point not raised is the absence in the record of a written order of revocation of probation with the reasons for revocation set forth therein as required in Watts v. State, 688 So.2d 1018 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). We remand with direction for entry of such written order.
GUNTHER and GROSS, JJ., and GLICKSTEIN, HUGH S., Senior Judge, concur.