Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Karl E. MOORE, Sr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-12-23
Citations: 556 F. App'x 179
Docket Number: No. 13-7255
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Karl E. MOORE, Sr., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 556
Pages: 179–179

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Karl E. MOORE, Sr., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-7255.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 19, 2013.
Decided: Dec. 23, 2013.
Karl E. Moore, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Laura Marie Everhart, Benjamin L. Hatch, Assistant United States Attorneys, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Karl E. Moore, Sr., appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Moore, 2:02-cr-00217-RAJ-JEB-1 (E.D.Va. July 26, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.