Case Name: Albert Crisman v. The State
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1923-02-14
Citations: 93 Tex. Crim. 393
Docket Number: No. 7643
Parties: Albert Crisman v. The State.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Criminal Reports
Volume: 93
Pages: 393–393

Head Matter:
Albert Crisman v. The State.
No. 7643.
Decided February 14, 1923.
Burglary — Heaviest Penalty — Practice on Appeal.
Notwithstanding the heaviest penalty for ordinary burglary is assessed against appellant the court must presume in the absence of a statement of facts that the evidence warranted the same.
Appeal from the District Court of Grayson. Tried beiow before the Honorable F. E. Wilcox.
Appeal from a conviction of burglary; penalty, twelve years imprisonment in the penitentiary.
The opinion states the case.
No brief on file for appellant.
R. G. Storey, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Opinion:
HAWKINS, Judge.
Upon conviction for' burglary, punishment was assessed against appellant at twelve years in the penitentiary.
No bills of exception appear in the record, and no statement of facts accompanies the transcript. Nothing is before us for review. Notwithstanding the heaviest penalty permitted upon conviction for ordinary burglary was assessed against appellant, we must presume the facts justified it.
The judgment must be affirmed.
Affirmed.