Case Name: Brian GALLAGHER, Petitioner v. GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2017-08-08
Citations: 170 A.3d 974
Docket Number: No. 87 WAL 2017
Parties: Brian GALLAGHER, Petitioner v. GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, Respondent
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 170
Pages: 974–975

Head Matter:
Brian GALLAGHER, Petitioner v. GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, Respondent
No. 87 WAL 2017
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
August 8, 2017

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 8th day of August, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by the Petitioner, are:
(1) Whether the "household vehicle exclusion" violates Section 1738 of the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (MVFRL) where GEICO issued all household policies and unilaterally decided to issue two separate policies, when the insured desired stacking, elected stacking, paid ad ditional premiums for stacking and never knowingly waived stacking of underinsured motorist benefits?
(2) Whether the "household vehicle exclusion" impermissibly narrows or conflicts with the statutory mandates of the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law and the evidence of record is that GEICO was fully aware of the risks of insuring a motorcycle in the same household as other family vehicles but unilaterally decided to write a separate motorcycle policy?