Case Name: Monica HALAS, et al. v. TOWN OF BOOTHBAY, et al.
Court: Maine Supreme Judicial Court
Jurisdiction: Maine
Decision Date: 1989-04-14
Citations: 556 A.2d 665
Docket Number: 
Parties: Monica HALAS, et al. v. TOWN OF BOOTHBAY, et al.
Judges: Before McKUSICK, C.J., and ROBERTS, WATHEN, GLASSMAN, CLIFFORD and COLLINS, JJ.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 556
Pages: 665–666

Head Matter:
Monica HALAS, et al. v. TOWN OF BOOTHBAY, et al.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.
Argued March 14, 1989.
Decided April 14, 1989.
Monica Halas (orally), Boston, Mass, pro se.
Craig Beling (orally), Estelle Lavoie, Pre-ti, Flaherty, Beliveau & Pachios, Portland, for Morrisette.
Frank G. Chapman, Lauren Folsom (orally), Hiscock & Barclay, Augusta, for defendants.
Before McKUSICK, C.J., and ROBERTS, WATHEN, GLASSMAN, CLIFFORD and COLLINS, JJ.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
Monica Halas and Robert O'Connor appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, (Lincoln County, Chandler, J.), affirming a decision of the Boothbay Zoning Board of Appeals that had, in turn, affirmed a decision of the Boothbay Planning Board. The Planning Board granted Paul Morissette a permit to perform modifications to a building known as the Forest House. The Planning Board determined that a grandfathered, non-conforming use of the Forest House had not been discontinued for a period of twelve calendar months. The question before us is limited to whether the decision was arbitrary, unlawful or unsupported by substantial evidence in the record. Camden and Rockland Water Co. v. Town of Hope, 543 A.2d 827, 829 (Me.1988). Review of the record reveals substantial evidence to support the Board's factual finding and no arbitrary or unlawful action.
The entry is:
Judgment affirmed.
All concurring.