Case Name: John K. SCHOFIELD, et al., Appellants, v. KEYSTONE PROVIDENT LIFE INSURANCE CO., et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-04-11
Citations: 577 So. 2d 713
Docket Number: No. 90-551
Parties: John K. SCHOFIELD, et al., Appellants, v. KEYSTONE PROVIDENT LIFE INSURANCE CO., et al., Appellees.
Judges: DAUKSCH, COBB and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 577
Pages: 713–714

Head Matter:
John K. SCHOFIELD, et al., Appellants, v. KEYSTONE PROVIDENT LIFE INSURANCE CO., et al., Appellees.
No. 90-551.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
April 11, 1991.
Elizabeth Koebel Russo of Elizabeth Koebel Russo, P.A. and Ana M. Gilaberte of Anderson, Moss, Parks & Russo, P.A., Miami, for appellants.
Martin I. Kaminsky of Pollack & Kamin-sky, New York City, Michael S. Orfinger and David S. Oliver of Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith & Cutler, Orlando, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from an order awarding costs and fees. The amount of the award, the complexity of the issues and the request of the appellant all require that an evidentiary hearing be given to determine the proper amount of the award. From the record it is apparent that at least some of the costs may have been overstated, or at least not properly authenticated. Appellant is entitled to a full evidentiary hearing before the costs in this matter can be fairly and properly assessed.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
DAUKSCH, COBB and HARRIS, JJ., concur.