Case Name: Kurt M. HOWARD, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Janice Marie HOWARD, Respondent/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1994-08-16
Citations: 885 S.W.2d 729
Docket Number: No. 64558
Parties: Kurt M. HOWARD, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Janice Marie HOWARD, Respondent/Appellant.
Judges: Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 885
Pages: 729–729

Head Matter:
Kurt M. HOWARD, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Janice Marie HOWARD, Respondent/Appellant.
No. 64558.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Aug. 16, 1994.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 19, 1994.
Lawrence G. Gillespie, Julie K. Morían, Eisen, Gillespie & Hilton, Webster Groves, for appellant.
Jill A. Silverstein, Merle L. Silverstein, Rosenblum, Goldenhersh, Silverstein & Zafft, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Former wife appeals the denial of her motion to modify the maintenance provisions of a decree of dissolution. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).