Case Name: WADE v. ADAMS
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1923-06-04
Citations: 1 Ohio Law Abs. 614
Docket Number: No. 4407
Parties: WADE v. ADAMS
Judges: Vickery, Levine and Sullivan, JJ.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 1
Pages: 614–614

Head Matter:
No. 645
WADE v. ADAMS
Ohio Appeals, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County
No. 4407.
Decided June 4, 1923
Thi» opinion has not been published except in Abstract.
EVIDENCE — Judgment rendered on uncorroborated testimony.
(Note: The. facts of the case are not given in the opinion.)
Vickery, Levine and Sullivan, JJ.
Attorneys — A. H. Krause, for Wade; White, Brewer & Curtiss, for Adams.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Epitomized Opinion
Adams sued Wade and recovered judgment in Cleveland Municipal Court. Wade prosecuted error on ground that judgment Was contrary to weight of evidence. Adam's testimony was uncorroborated. Court of Appeals in affirming judgment held:
1. While in a sense the evidence of Adams was uncorroborated there is no rule of law which demands corroboration in such a case. If court was satisfied Adam's version of transaction was to be believed, rather than other party's version, he was elerly within his rights.