Case Name: Walter VILLEDA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND; Kurt K. Godfrey, Detective # 1494, Defendants-Appellees. UNITED STATES of America, Movant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-08-05
Citations: 70 F. App'x 720
Docket Number: No. 02-7417
Parties: Walter VILLEDA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY, MARYLAND; Kurt K. Godfrey, Detective # 1494, Defendants-Appellees. UNITED STATES of America, Movant.
Judges: Before LUTTIG, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 70
Pages: 720–721

Head Matter:
Walter VILLEDA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY, MARYLAND; Kurt K. Godfrey, Detective # 1494, Defendants-Appellees. UNITED STATES of America, Movant.
No. 02-7417.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted June 23, 2003.
Decided Aug. 5, 2003.
Henry A. Escoto, Baldwin, Molina & Escoto, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Shalisha H. Ivy, Associate County Attorney, Upper Marlboro, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before LUTTIG, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Walter Villeda appeals the district court's order awarding Prince George's County and Detective Godfrey summary judgment in his civil action, in which he alleged Fourth Amendment and pendent state law claims in regard to his arrest by Godfrey. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Villeda v. Prince George's County, 219 F.Supp.2d 696, No. CA-01-2566-DKC (D.Md. Aug. 29, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.