Case Name: Daryl L. DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-11-07
Citations: 30 S.W.3d 925
Docket Number: No. ED 77572
Parties: Daryl L. DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before: CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, Jr., J., and JAMES R. DOWD, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 30
Pages: 925–925

Head Matter:
Daryl L. DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 77572.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Nov. 7, 2000.
Douglas R. Hoff, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Stacy L. Anderson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before: CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, Jr., J., and JAMES R. DOWD, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Daryl Davis appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.085 motion without a hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 81.16(b).