Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Jonathan Rommel RICE, Defendant/Appellant.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2018-10-16
Citations: 559 S.W.3d 115
Docket Number: No. ED 105719
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent,
v.
Jonathan Rommel RICE, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 559
Pages: 115–115

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent,
v.
Jonathan Rommel RICE, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 105719
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Filed: October 16, 2018
Karen L. Kramer, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Plaintiff/Respondent.
Carol D. Jansen, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203, For Defendant/Appellant.
Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Jonathan Rommel Rice appeals from the trial court's judgment entered after a jury trial. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing a request for adjournment. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).