Case Name: Tyree W. BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Andrea Rose, Plaintiff, v. MERRELL DOW PHARMACEUTICALS; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-04-09
Citations: 227 F. App'x 614
Docket Number: No. 06-56167
Parties: Tyree W. BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Andrea Rose, Plaintiff, v. MERRELL DOW PHARMACEUTICALS; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: O’SCANNLAIN, GRABER and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 227
Pages: 614–615

Head Matter:
Tyree W. BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Andrea Rose, Plaintiff, v. MERRELL DOW PHARMACEUTICALS; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 06-56167.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 4, 2007 .
Filed April 9, 2007.
Tyree W. Brown, Gulfport, MS, pro se.
Robert Dickson, Esq., Los Angeles, CA, Kirtland & Packard, El Segundo, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, GRABER and BEA, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
A review of the record, the opening brief, and the response to the court's order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.
All pending motions are denied as moot.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.