Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Oral Dawkins, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2011-08-02
Citations: 87 A.D.3d 550
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Oral Dawkins, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 87
Pages: 550–550

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Oral Dawkins, Appellant.
[927 NYS2d 797]

Opinion:
Since the defendant had not yet completed his originally imposed sentence of imprisonment when he was resentenced, the resentencing to a term including the statutorily required period of postrelease supervision did not subject him to double jeopardy or violate his right to due process of law (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]). Angiolillo, J.E, Florio, Leventhal and Miller, JJ., concur.