Case Name: Life & Casualty Insurance Company of Tennessee v. Wiggins
Court: Arkansas Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Arkansas
Decision Date: 1954-12-13
Citations: 224 Ark. 377
Docket Number: 5-536
Parties: Life & Casualty Insurance Company of Tennessee v. Wiggins.
Judges: 
Reporter: Arkansas Reports
Volume: 224
Pages: 377–378

Head Matter:
Life & Casualty Insurance Company of Tennessee v. Wiggins.
5-536
273 S. W. 2d 405
Opinion delivered December 13, 1954.
J. Bruce Streett, for appellant.
Carroll C. Hollemworth, for appellee.

Opinion:
Robinson, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment for 12% penalty amounting to $120, and $150 allowed as attorney's fee in a suit on a $1,000 policy of life insurance. The insured died on August 28, 1953; proof of death was furnished to the insurance company on October 12, 1953. Liability was denied October 22, and suit was filed on November 18. A motion to make the complaint more definite and certain was filed January 19, 1954, and an amended and substituted answer was filed February 1, 1954. The record does not contain the original answer nor is there any showing as to when it was filed or the contents thereof. The amended and substituted answer admitted that the defendant insurance company was indebted to the plaintiff for the face amount of the policy, $1,000, and the defendant paid this amount into court but alleged that it had in good faitli originally denied liability under the mistaken belief that the policy was not in force, and for this reason appellant contends that no penalty and attorney's fee should be allowed.
According to the records in the home office of the insurance company, the policy had lapsed on the Monday preceding the Friday that the insured died; but the records were not correct. The policyholder had not been given credit for one payment of a weekly premium which extended the policy beyond the date of death. Subse quent- to the death of the insured, the company had asked the beneficiary to send in the premium receipt book showing the payments correctly, or a photostatic copy thereof. However., the beneficiary did not feel like giving up possession of the premium receipt book, nor were facilities available locally for making a photostatic copy thereof.
The law is well settled in this state that'good faith on the part of the insurance company is not a valid defense -against the allowance of an attorney's fee and penalty. Life & Casualty Ins. Co. of Tennessee v. Barefield, 187 Ark. 676, 61 S. W. 2d 698; Missouri State Life Ins. Co. v. Martin, 188 Ark. 907, 69 S. W. 1081; American Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. v. Washington, 183 Ark. 497, 36 S. W. 2d 963. In Life & Casualty Ins. Co. of Tennessee v. McCray, 187 Ark. 49, 58 S. W. 2d 199, this court said: "Appellant also contends that it should not be taxed with the penalty and attorney's fee imposed by statute because it says it defended in good faith . . . but, assuming appellant defended in good faith, this does not excuse it from the plain provisions of the statute, . . This question is now settled, and we decline to reconsider the matter."
Affirmed.