Case Name: STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, v. Ondra Bond, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Wisconsin Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Wisconsin
Decision Date: 2001-05-31
Citations: 243 Wis. 2d 476
Docket Number: No. 98-3139-CR.
Parties: STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, v. Ondra Bond, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Wisconsin Reports Second
Volume: 243
Pages: 476–477

Head Matter:
STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, v. Ondra Bond, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court
No. 98-3139-CR.
Oral argument May 2, 2001.
Decided May 31, 2001.
2001 WI 56
(Also reported in 627 N.W.2d 484.)
For the petitioner-respondent-petitioner the cause was argued by Marguerite M. Moeller, assistant attor ney general, with whom on the briefs was James E. Doyle, attorney general.
For the defendant-appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Ellen Henak, assistant state public defender.
Motion for reconsideration denied September 21, 2001.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
¶ 1. The court is equally divided on whether to affirm or reverse the decision of the court of appeals. Chief Justice Shirley S. Abraham-son, Justice Ann Walsh Bradley, and Justice David T. Prosser would affirm; Justice William A. Bablitch, Justice Jon P. Wilcox, and Justice N. Patrick Crooks would reverse. Justice Diane S. Sykes did not participate.
¶ 2. Accordingly, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.