Case Name: Cleveland LYNN, III, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-01-27
Citations: 537 So. 2d 691
Docket Number: No. 88-302
Parties: Cleveland LYNN, III, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SMITH, C.J., and ERVIN and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 537
Pages: 691–692

Head Matter:
Cleveland LYNN, III, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 88-302.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jan. 27, 1989.
Michael E. Allen, Public Defender; P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., A.E. Pooser, IV, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The Public Defender filed an Anders brief and the appellant filed a short pro se brief.
At sentencing of the defendant in the instant case (trial court case #87-4695), the court announced that the sentences imposed were to run concurrent with the sentence imposed in a previous case (trial court case # 87-2255). However, the written sentence omits such provision for concurrency. On remand, the trial court shall amend to provide for such concurrency.
We affirm the judgments and sentences but remand for the purpose stated above.
SMITH, C.J., and ERVIN and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.
. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).