Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Douglas Steven BACON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-04-10
Citations: 175 F. App'x 855
Docket Number: No. 05-30080
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Douglas Steven BACON, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: HAWKINS, MCKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 175
Pages: 855–855

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Douglas Steven BACON, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 05-30080.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 5, 2006.
Decided April 10, 2006.
Paulette L. Stewart, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Helena, MT, for PlaintiffAppellee.
David F. Ness, Esq., Federal Defenders of Montana, Great Falls, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: HAWKINS, MCKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Douglas Steven Bacon appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 105-month sentence for possession of a stolen firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(j).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Bacon has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Bacon has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Our independent review of the record, pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief.
Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.