Case Name: Patrick J. LAWLER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-11-09
Citations: 4 S.W.3d 634
Docket Number: No. ED 75824
Parties: Patrick J. LAWLER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., ROBERT J. DOWD, Jr., J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 4
Pages: 634–635

Head Matter:
Patrick J. LAWLER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 75824.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Nov. 9, 1999.
Jane Berman, Asst. Sp. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., ROBERT J. DOWD, Jr., J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Patrick J. Lawler, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum for the parties, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).