Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Hector Ivan BAUTISTA-GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-02-28
Citations: 267 F. App'x 380
Docket Number: No. 06-41106
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Hector Ivan BAUTISTA-GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before HIGGINBOTHAM, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 267
Pages: 380–381

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Hector Ivan BAUTISTA-GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-41106
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Feb. 28, 2008.
James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Hector Ivan Bautista-Gonzalez appeals the 24-month sentence he received follow ing his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Bautista-Gonzalez contends that the district court misapplied the Sentencing Guidelines by characterizing his prior Texas state felony drug conviction for possession of a controlled substance as an "aggravated felony" for purposes of U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C). Given the Supreme Court's decision in Lopez v. Gonzales, 549 U.S. 47, 127 S.Ct. 625, 166 L.Ed.2d 462 (2006), Bautista-Gonzalez is correct that his prior conviction is not an aggravated felony. See United States v. Estrada-Mendoza, 475 F.3d 258, 259-61 (5th Cir. 2007).
The Government concedes that the district court erred in characterizing the state offense as an aggravated felony and in imposing an eight-level increase pursuant to § 2L1.2(b)(l)(C), but contends that the error was harmless. The Government has failed to meet its burden of showing that the error was harmless. See Fed. R.Crim.P. 52(a); United States v. Pineiro, 410 F.3d 282, 286 (5th Cir.2005); United States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511, 520 n. 9 (5th Cir.2005).
We VACATE Bautista-Gonzalez's sentence and REMAND for resentencing.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.