Case Name: City of Columbus, Appellee, v. Hayes, Appellant
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1967-01-03
Citations: 9 Ohio App. 2d 38
Docket Number: No. 8457
Parties: City of Columbus, Appellee, v. Hayes, Appellant.
Judges: Duffy, Duffey and Troop, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio Appellate Reports, Second Series
Volume: 9
Pages: 38–39

Head Matter:
City of Columbus, Appellee, v. Hayes, Appellant.
[Cite as City of Columbus v. Hayes, 9 Ohio App. 2d 38.]
(No. 8457
Decided January 3, 1967.)
Mr. John C. Young, city attorney, Mr. Gordon L. Sroufe and Mr. J. Larry LacJcsen, for appellee.
Mr. Joseph H. Hans, for appellant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This is an appeal from the Municipal Court of Columbus. Appellant was convicted of operating a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol.
The first assignment of error relates to the trial court's refusal to suppress test results and testimony as to statements of appellant. Reliance is placed on Miranda v. Arizona (1966), 381 U. S. 136, 16 L. Ed. 2d 691, 86 S. Ct. 1602. In our opinion, the punishment for the offense charged is not now such as to bring this case within constitutional limitations on custodial interrogation. Of course, the denial of the right to counsel, interrogation against the will of the accused, and similar practices are proper factors in determining whether a statement is involuntary and entitled to be excluded on that ground. However, in the present case, we find no error in admitting the evidence.
The second assignment relates to exclusion of questioning as to a presumption contained in the Columbus ordinance. We find no prejudicial error.
The judgment of the Municipal Court will be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Duffy, Duffey and Troop, JJ., concur.