Case Name: SAGE BRUCE BUTLER, Appellant, v. Lt. Jamie RUSSELL, Acting Commander, Lincoln County Jail; and Dennis Dotson, Lincoln County Sheriff, Respondents
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2005-07-06
Citations: 200 Or. App. 556
Docket Number: 03-5104; A123998
Parties: SAGE BRUCE BUTLER, Appellant, v. Lt. Jamie RUSSELL, Acting Commander, Lincoln County Jail; and Dennis Dotson, Lincoln County Sheriff, Respondents.
Judges: Before Wollheim, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Schuman, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 200
Pages: 556–557

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted June 2,
appeal dismissed as moot July 6,
petition for review denied October 4, 2005 (339 Or 406)
SAGE BRUCE BUTLER, Appellant, v. Lt. Jamie RUSSELL, Acting Commander, Lincoln County Jail; and Dennis Dotson, Lincoln County Sheriff, Respondents.
03-5104; A123998
114 P3d 543
Steven H. Gorham argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.
Rob Bovett, Assistant County Counsel, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents.
Before Wollheim, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Schuman, Judges.
PER CURIAM
Edmonds, J., vice Richardson, S. J.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Plaintiff, who when he filed this case was an inmate of the Lincoln County Jail, appeals from the trial court's dismissal of a writ of habeas corpus in which plaintiff, an enrolled member of the Siletz Tribe and a participant in the Native American religion, challenges the jail policy denying him possession of a ceremonial eagle feather that he uses for religious purposes. He argues, among other things, that he would be entitled to possess the feather under the policies that the Department of Corrections follows in state prisons.
After the trial in this case, plaintiff was transferred to the custody of the Department of Corrections. Although a transfer of physical custody does not in itself divest a court of jurisdiction under a writ of habeas corpus, Anderson v. Britton, 212 Or 1, 5, 318 P2d 291 (1957), cert den, 356 US 962 (1958); McGee v. Johnson, 161 Or App 384, 984 P2d 341 (1999), a change in custody may render a plaintiff's claims moot. McGee v. Baldwin, 183 Or App 1, 3-4, 51 P3d 614 (2002), rev den, 335 Or 195 (2003). Petitioner is now in the custody of the Department of Corrections, whose policies are consistent with those that he argues the Lincoln County Jail should have applied. A decision on his claims, thus, would have no practical effect on his situation, and the case is therefore moot.
Appeal dismissed as moot.