Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Keane Z. OKELLEY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-06-14
Citations: 134 F. App'x 178
Docket Number: No. 03-30110
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Keane Z. OKELLEY, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: HALL, KLEINFELD, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 134
Pages: 178–178

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Keane Z. OKELLEY, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 03-30110.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
June 14, 2005.
Jo Ann Farrington, Esq., USAK—Office of the U.S. Attorney, Anchorage, AK, for Plaintiff—Appellee.
Kenneth E. Kanev, Esq., Seattle, WA, for Defendant—Appellant. D.C. No. CR-02-00067-RRB.
Before: HALL, KLEINFELD, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
We remand the sentence imposed in this case to the district court, without vacating the sentence, to follow the procedure established in the en banc decision of United States v. Ameline, and to consider whether the sentence would have been materially different in light of United States v. Booker.
. United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc).
. United States v. Booker, — U.S. —, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).