Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Charles HARRY, Appellant; Charles HARRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1994-11-01
Citations: 886 S.W.2d 217
Docket Number: No. 63143
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Charles HARRY, Appellant. Charles HARRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 886
Pages: 217–217

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Charles HARRY, Appellant. Charles HARRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 63143.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Nov. 1, 1994.
Robert E. Steele, Jr., St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., David G. Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Charles Hairy, appeals from his conviction for involuntary manslaughter and armed criminal action in St. Louis County Circuit Court, and from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgments of the circuit court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the circuit court's judgments pursuant to Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties here involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.