Case Name: A.M.D., Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES and Guardian ad Litem Program, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2009-09-30
Citations: 19 So. 3d 435
Docket Number: No. 3D09-1110
Parties: A.M.D., Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES and Guardian ad Litem Program, Appellees.
Judges: Before RAMIREZ, C.J., SUAREZ, J., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 19
Pages: 435–435

Head Matter:
A.M.D., Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES and Guardian ad Litem Program, Appellees.
No. 3D09-1110.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Sept. 30, 2009.
Joseph P. George, Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, Third Region, and Kevin Colbert, Assistant Counsel, for appellant.
Karla Perkins, Assistant District Legal Counsel, for appellee Department of Children & Families; Hillary S. Kambour, for appellee Guardian ad Litem Program.
Before RAMIREZ, C.J., SUAREZ, J., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Because the record contains ample evidence to support the termination of appellant-father's parental rights on grounds of failure to comply with his case plan, § 39.806(l)(e)l., Fla. Stat. (2008), and abandonment, § 39.806(l)(b), Fla. Stat. (2008), the judgment under review is affirmed.
Affirmed.
. We do not reach the sufficiency of the evidence as to section 39.806(l)(c), Florida Statutes (2008).