Case Name: Kenneth Harold MOODY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1997-10-02
Citations: 699 So. 2d 1009
Docket Number: No. 90014
Parties: Kenneth Harold MOODY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: KOGAN, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, HARDING and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 699
Pages: 1009–1009

Head Matter:
Kenneth Harold MOODY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 90014.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Oct. 2, 1997.
Kenneth Harold Moody, Blountstown, Pro Se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; Robert J. Krauss, Senior Assistant Attorney General and Dale E. Tarpley, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have for review Moody v. State, 696 So.2d 797 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997), which expressly and directly conflicts with decisions of the Third and Fourth District Courts of Appeal. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.
We quash the decision below and remand for further proceedings consistent with our opinion in State v. Hudson, 698 So.2d 831 (Fla.1997).
KOGAN, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, HARDING and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.
WELLS, J., dissents with an opinion, in which GRIMES, J., concurs.