Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ramon Aquilino LEON-ZAPON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-12-11
Citations: 624 F. App'x 226
Docket Number: No. 15-40447
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ramon Aquilino LEON-ZAPON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before HIGGINBOTHAM, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 624
Pages: 226–226

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ramon Aquilino LEON-ZAPON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-40447
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 11, 2015.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Ramon Aquilino Leon-Zapon, Folkston, GA, pro se.
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ramon Aquilino Leon-Zapon has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Leon-Zapon has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Leon-Zapon's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 123, 190 L.Ed.2d 94 (2014).
We have' reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Leon-Zapon's response. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no non-frivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Leon-Zapon's motion to appoint new counsel is DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir.1998).
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.