Case Name: Charlene MORISSEAU, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DLA PIPER, formerly known as Piper Rudnick LLP and formerly known as DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary U.S. LLP, Robert Fink, Esq., Joseph Finnerty, III, Esq., Joseph Finnerty, Jr., Esq., Leroy Inskeep, Esq., Denise Kaback, Aaron Katz, Esq., Heidi Levine, Esq., Marrilla Ochis, Esq., Peter Pantaleo, Esq., Douglas Rappaport, Esq. and Amy Schulman, Esq., Defendant-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-12-04
Citations: 355 F. App'x 487
Docket Number: No. 08-0697-cv
Parties: Charlene MORISSEAU, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DLA PIPER, formerly known as Piper Rudnick LLP and formerly known as DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary U.S. LLP, Robert Fink, Esq., Joseph Fin nerty, III, Esq., Joseph Finnerty, Jr., Esq., Leroy Inskeep, Esq., Denise Kaback, Aaron Katz, Esq., Heidi Levine, Esq., Marrilla Ochis, Esq., Peter Pantaleo, Esq., Douglas Rappaport, Esq. and Amy Schulman, Esq., Defendant-Appellees.
Judges: Present: WILFRED FEINBERG, WALKER, and ROBERT A. KATZMANN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 355
Pages: 487–488

Head Matter:
Charlene MORISSEAU, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DLA PIPER, formerly known as Piper Rudnick LLP and formerly known as DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary U.S. LLP, Robert Fink, Esq., Joseph Fin nerty, III, Esq., Joseph Finnerty, Jr., Esq., Leroy Inskeep, Esq., Denise Kaback, Aaron Katz, Esq., Heidi Levine, Esq., Marrilla Ochis, Esq., Peter Pantaleo, Esq., Douglas Rappaport, Esq. and Amy Schulman, Esq., Defendant-Appellees.
No. 08-0697-cv.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Dec. 4, 2009.
Charlene .Morisseau, Harrison, NY, pro se.
Bettina B. Plevan (Edward A. Brill, of counsel), Proskauer Rose LLP, New York, NY, for Defendants-Appellees.
Present: WILFRED FEINBERG, WALKER, and ROBERT A. KATZMANN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
SUMMARY ORDER
Plaintiff-Appellant Charlene Morisseau appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Kaplan, J.), entered December 4, 2007, 2007 WL 4292030, granting defendants' motion for summary judgment and dismissing the complaint; a Memorandum Opinion entered January 23, 2008, 532 F.Supp.2d 595, denying Morisseau's motion to amend the judgment; and an order entered February 7, 2008, denying Morisseau's motion for reconsideration. We assume the parties' familiarity with the facts, procedural history, and specification of issues on appeal.
We have considered all of Morisseau's arguments on appeal and find them without merit. Therefore, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.