Case Name: Eugene ALLEN, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2017-09-20
Citations: 230 So. 3d 126
Docket Number: No. 3D17-1907
Parties: Eugene ALLEN, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: Before LAGOA, EMAS and SCALES, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 230
Pages: 126–127

Head Matter:
Eugene ALLEN, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 3D17-1907
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Opinion filed September 20, 2017
Rehearing Denied October 6, 2017
Eugene Allen, in proper person.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for respondent.
Before LAGOA, EMAS and SCALES, JJ.

Opinion:
SCALES, J.
Eugene Allen files this petition for writ of certiorari seeking to compel the Department of Corrections ("DOC") to restore gain time he previously forfeited due to violation of his conditional release. We deny the writ without prejudice to Allen obtaining a final order from DOC from which Allen can seek mandamus relief in the circuit court.
"The proper remedy to compel an award of gain time is a petition for writ of mandamus filed in the circuit court after administrative procedures through DOC have been exhausted." Duggan v. Dep't of Corrections, 665 So.2d 1152, 1153 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996) (emphasis added). While not entirely clear on the scant record before us, it appears the trial court found that it was without jurisdiction to consider, and therefore denied, Allen's petition for writ of mandamus because Allen did not exhaust DOC administrative procedures pri- or to seeking relief in the circuit court. Specifically, the only thing in the record before us is an unsigned memorandum— purportedly from someone working at the Bureau of Classification Management for DOC to Everglades Correctional Institution, where Allen is currently incarcerated—which states that Allen is ineligible for restoration of gain time.
While Allen may have initiated an administrative remedy, it does not appear to us that DOC has taken final action in this matter. Therefore, it appears the trial court properly denied Allen's mandamus petition because it lacked jurisdiction. Similarly we deny Allen's petition for writ of certiorari without prejudice so that Allen may exhaust his administrative remedies and, if unsuccessful, file a petition for writ of mandamus in the circuit court.
Petition denied.