Case Name: Arlety MERCADO, Appellant, v. Bruce FITELL, P.A. and Tate Management, Inc., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2004-06-30
Citations: 875 So. 2d 807
Docket Number: No. 3D03-2036
Parties: Arlety MERCADO, Appellant, v. Bruce FITELL, P.A. and Tate Management, Inc., Appellees.
Judges: Before GERSTEN, GREEN, and SHEPHERD, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 875
Pages: 807–807

Head Matter:
Arlety MERCADO, Appellant, v. Bruce FITELL, P.A. and Tate Management, Inc., Appellees.
No. 3D03-2036.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
June 30, 2004.
Friedman & Friedman, and John S. Sel-igman, Coral Gables, for appellant.
Blaxberg, Grayson, Kukoff & Segal, and I. Barry Blaxberg, and Ian J. Kukoff, Miami, for appellee.
Before GERSTEN, GREEN, and SHEPHERD, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the trial court=s order denying the appellant's right to pursue a negligence claim against a court appointed receiver. Because the appellant filed this negligence complaint within the four year statute of limitations contained in Section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes (2004), the trial court=s ruling to the contrary constitutes obvious error and requires reversal. See Hardy Equip. Co., Inc. v. Travis Cosby & Assoc., Inc., 530 So.2d 521 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Pezzi v. Brown, 697 So.2d 883 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).
Reversed.