Case Name: George D'Annunzio, respondent, v. Bridget D'Annunzio, appellant
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1920-10-21
Citations: 92 N.J. Eq. 236
Docket Number: 
Parties: George D’Annunzio, respondent, v. Bridget D’Annunzio, appellant.
Judges: For affirmance—The Ci-iiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, Katzenbacii, White, PIeppeni-ieimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, Ackerson—15.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 92
Pages: 236–237

Head Matter:
George D’Annunzio, respondent, v. Bridget D’Annunzio, appellant.
[Decided October 21st, 1920.]
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Stevenson, whose opinion is reported in 91 N. J. Eq. 186.
Mr. Anthony Boiti, for the respondent.
Mr. Edward M. Salley, for the appellant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Stevenson.
For affirmance—The Ci-iiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, Katzenbacii, White, PIeppeni-ieimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, Ackerson—15.
For reversal—None.