Case Name: In re MARRIAGE OF Kenneth C. Lain and Rose E. LAIN. Kenneth C. LAIN, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Rose E. LAIN, Respondent/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-11-21
Citations: 913 S.W.2d 58
Docket Number: No. 67265
Parties: In re MARRIAGE OF Kenneth C. Lain and Rose E. LAIN. Kenneth C. LAIN, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Rose E. LAIN, Respondent/Appellant.
Judges: Before CRANE, C.J., and CRANDALL and KAROHL, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 913
Pages: 58–59

Head Matter:
In re MARRIAGE OF Kenneth C. Lain and Rose E. LAIN. Kenneth C. LAIN, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Rose E. LAIN, Respondent/Appellant.
No. 67265.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Northern Division.
Nov. 21, 1995.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 4, 1996.
Charles C. Schwartz, Jr., Schwartz & Ochs, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeffrey R. Curl, Clayton Law Offices, Hannibal, for respondent.
Before CRANE, C.J., and CRANDALL and KAROHL, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Both parties appeal from the trial court's judgment in a dissolution action which awarded custody of the parties' two minor children to Petitioner, Kenneth C. Lain. We have reviewed the record and the briefs filed by the parties and find the circuit court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prec-edential value.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).