Case Name: Alan Andrew MACKETY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Stephanie HOLLEMBAEK; United States of America, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-08-15
Citations: 695 F. App'x 60
Docket Number: No. 17-6488
Parties: Alan Andrew MACKETY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Stephanie HOLLEMBAEK; United States of America, Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 695
Pages: 60–60

Head Matter:
Alan Andrew MACKETY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Stephanie HOLLEMBAEK; United States of America, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 17-6488
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: August 4, 2017
Decided: August 15, 2017
Alan Andrew Mackety, Appellant Pro Se.
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Alan Andrew Mackety, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pau-peris, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Mackety v. Hollembaek, No. 5:16-hc-02120-D, 2017 WL 1162176 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 28, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED