Case Name: A.T.A., Petitioner/Respondent, v. B.S.S., Respondent/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2017-04-25
Citations: 516 S.W.3d 454
Docket Number: No. ED 104532
Parties: A.T.A., Petitioner/Respondent, v. B.S.S., Respondent/Appellant.
Judges: Before Angela T. Quigless, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 516
Pages: 454–454

Head Matter:
A.T.A., Petitioner/Respondent, v. B.S.S., Respondent/Appellant.
No. ED 104532
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
FILED: April 25, 2017
Steven A. Waterkotte, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Henry M. Miller, Jr., William P. Grant, Clayton, MO, for Respondent.
Before Angela T. Quigless, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
B.S.S. appeals the judgment of the circuit court granting an Order of Protection against him in favor of A.T.A. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for then' information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).