Case Name: Andre Sylvester WATTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ms. EASTERN-TAYLOR, S-l Post Officer; Lieutenant Hicks; Sergeant Byrd, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-01-14
Citations: 85 F. App'x 328
Docket Number: No. 03-7212
Parties: Andre Sylvester WATTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ms. EASTERN-TAYLOR, S-l Post Officer; Lieutenant Hicks; Sergeant Byrd, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before WIDENER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 85
Pages: 328–328

Head Matter:
Andre Sylvester WATTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ms. EASTERN-TAYLOR, S-l Post Officer; Lieutenant Hicks; Sergeant Byrd, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 03-7212.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 22, 2003.
Decided Jan. 14, 2004.
Andre Sylvester Watts, Appellant pro se.
Before WIDENER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Andre Sylvester Watts appeals the district court's denial of his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion in which he sought to vacate its judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2000) for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Finding no reversible error, we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's order. See Watts v. Eastern-Taylor, No. CA-02-861-AM (E.D. Va. July 28, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED