Case Name: Anthony ADAMS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-02-07
Citations: 669 So. 2d 284
Docket Number: Nos. 94-2650, 94-2992
Parties: Anthony ADAMS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and LEVY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 669
Pages: 284–285

Head Matter:
Anthony ADAMS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Nos. 94-2650, 94-2992.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 7, 1996.
Rehearing Denied March 27, 1996.
Anthony Adams, in pro per.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Paul Gayle-Smith, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and LEVY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Anthony Adams appeals an order denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We conclude that the second element of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), has not been satisfied, namely, even if defense counsel had taken the additional steps identified in appellant's motion, there is no reasonable probability that the trial outcome would have been different. See 466 U.S. at 694, 104 S.Ct. at 2068.
Affirmed.