Case Name: Robert E. Roller et al., Respondents, v. Gerald A. Buchheit, Jr., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1999-03-31
Citations: 259 A.D.2d 1012
Docket Number: Appeal No. 2
Parties: Robert E. Roller et al., Respondents, v Gerald A. Buchheit, Jr., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 259
Pages: 1012–1012

Head Matter:
Robert E. Roller et al., Respondents, v Gerald A. Buchheit, Jr., Appellant.
(Appeal No. 2.)
[689 NYS2d 883]

Opinion:
Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant's motion to dismiss the amended complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) and (7) (see, Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88; Grossman v Pharmhouse Corp., 234 AD2d 918, 919; Unadilla Silo Co. v Ernst & Young, 234 AD2d 754). Each of the causes of action in the amended complaint states a cognizable claim for declaratory or monetary relief based on theories of unconscionability or breach of contract (see, Grossman v Pharmhouse Corp., supra, at 919; Master Lease Corp. v Manhattan Limousine, 177 AD2d 85, 88-89, lv dismissed 80 NY2d 893). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Notaro, J. — Dismiss Pleading.) Present— Green, J. P., Hayes, Pigott, Jr., Scudder and Callahan, JJ.