Case Name: MARY SILAK, RESPONDENT, v. HUDSON AND MANHATTAN RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1935-10-09
Citations: 115 N.J.L. 504
Docket Number: 
Parties: MARY SILAK, RESPONDENT, v. HUDSON AND MANHATTAN RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 115
Pages: 504–505

Head Matter:
MARY SILAK, RESPONDENT, v. HUDSON AND MANHATTAN RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT.
Submitted May 31, 1935
Decided October 9, 1935.
For the respondent, Lichtenstein, Schwartz & Friedenberg,
For the appellant, Collins & Corbin.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Case in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Yan Buskirk, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolesKell, Bafferty, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.