Case Name: Aller, Plaintiff in error, v. State, Defendant in error
Court: Wisconsin Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Wisconsin
Decision Date: 1973-12-21
Citations: 61 Wis. 2d 740
Docket Number: No. State 19
Parties: Aller, Plaintiff in error, v. State, Defendant in error.
Judges: 
Reporter: Wisconsin Reports Second
Volume: 61
Pages: 740–741

Head Matter:
No. State 19.
Aller, Plaintiff in error, v. State, Defendant in error.
(Also reported in 212 N. W. 2d 702 and 214 N. W. 2d 431.)
For the plaintiff in error the cause was submitted on the brief of Moen, Sheehan & Meyer, Ltd., and Paul W. Henke, Jr., all of La Crosse.
For the defendant in error the cause was submitted on the brief of Robert W. Warren, attorney general, and Robert D. Martinson, assistant attorney general.
Motion for rehearing denied, without costs, on February 5, 1974.

Opinion:
The following opinion was filed on February 5, 1974.
Per Curiam
(on motion for rehearing). Plaintiff in error, David Aller, has moved for rehearing on the issue of whether evidence of a drug sale subsequent to that for which he was being tried was admissible in his trial on the initial charge. While the issue was properly preserved for appeal, the evidence was clearly admissible to rebut the defense of entrapment. State v. Monsoor (1973), 56 Wis. 2d 689, 203 N. W. 2d 20. ". . . This evidence need not be confined to past felony convictions and criminal reputation, and, as we have held, need not be limited to conduct occurring prior in time to the crime charged. . . ." Id. at pages 703, 704.
Motion for rehearing denied.