Case Name: ROBERT SIPKO, PLAINTIFF-MOVANT, v. KOGER, INC., KOGER DISTRIBUTED SOLUTIONS, INC., KOGER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC., KOGER LIMITED (DUBLIN), RASTISLAV SIPKO AND GEORGE SIPKO, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 2012-03-22
Citations: 210 N.J. 24
Docket Number: 
Parties: ROBERT SIPKO, PLAINTIFF-MOVANT, v. KOGER, INC., KOGER DISTRIBUTED SOLUTIONS, INC., KOGER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC., KOGER LIMITED (DUBLIN), RASTISLAV SIPKO AND GEORGE SIPKO, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 210
Pages: 24–24

Head Matter:
40 A.3d 55
ROBERT SIPKO, PLAINTIFF-MOVANT, v. KOGER, INC., KOGER DISTRIBUTED SOLUTIONS, INC., KOGER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC., KOGER LIMITED (DUBLIN), RASTISLAV SIPKO AND GEORGE SIPKO, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
March 22, 2012.

Opinion:
This matter having been duly presented to the Court, it is ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration is denied, provided, however, that the Court's Order granting certification in C-303-11 is hereby corrected to provide that the grant is limited to the issue whether the gift of stock to plaintiff was conditioned on his continued employment.