Case Name: Franklin L. Sheppard et al., Respondents, v. Rose Berney, Appellant
Court: New York City Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1900-12
Citations: 33 Misc. 796
Docket Number: 
Parties: Franklin L. Sheppard et al., Respondents, v. Rose Berney, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 33
Pages: 796–797

Head Matter:
Franklin L. Sheppard et al., Respondents, v. Rose Berney, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment entered upon a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Louis A. Jaffer (Abram S. Jaffer, of counsel), for appellant.
Roger Foster, for respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
In support of the appeal it is urged that there is no proof in the testimony of the value of the property alleged to have been converted at the time of the demand; that the verdict of the jury is excessive and against the weight of .evidence. We have carefully examined the record and find ample proof of value and in other respects the verdict is supported by the evidence. Judgment and order appealed from affirmed, with costs.
Present: McCarthy and O'Dwyer, JJ.
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.