Case Name: Adah B. Donison et al., Respondents, v. City of Spokane, Appellant
Court: Washington Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Washington
Decision Date: 1902-01-18
Citations: 27 Wash. 317
Docket Number: No. 4186
Parties: Adah B. Donison et al., Respondents, v. City of Spokane, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Washington Reports
Volume: 27
Pages: 317–317

Head Matter:
[No. 4186.
Decided January 18, 1902.]
Adah B. Donison et al., Respondents, v. City of Spokane, Appellant.
APPEAL-TIME 03? TAKING.
Where an appellant has actual notice of the granting and' entry of the order appealed from, although not served with written notice thereof, the tinfe for taking his appeal begins to run from the date of entry of the order, and where not taken within fifteen days after entry as prescribed by Bal. Code, § 6502, the appeal should be dismissed.
Appeal from Superior Court, Spokane County. — Hon. William: E. Bichabdson, Judge.
Appeal dismissed.
John P. Judson, for appellant.
Winston & Winston, Thomas M. Vance and Frank Reeves, for respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Motion is made to dismiss the appeal in this case for the reason that the same was not taken in time. It appears from the record that the appeal was not taken for more than fifteen days after the granting hj the court of the order appealed from, and, further, from affidavits on file, that the appellant had actual notice of the granting of the same at the time it was granted. This brings the case within the rule announced by this court in Braely v. Marks, 13 Wash. 224 (43 Pac. 27), and for the reasons there announced, the motion will he sustained and the appeal dismissed.