Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. James KOETTING, Movant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1993-11-02
Citations: 867 S.W.2d 596
Docket Number: No. 62641
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. James KOETTING, Movant/Appellant.
Judges: Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 867
Pages: 596–597

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. James KOETTING, Movant/Appellant.
No. 62641.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Nov. 2, 1993.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Dec. 16, 1993.
Application to Transfer Denied Jan. 25, 1994.
Dave Hemingway, St. Louis, for mov-ant/appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., F. Martin Dajani, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff/respondent.
Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals his conviction, by a jury, of second degree burglary, § 569.170, RSMo.1986, and stealing over $150.00, § 570.030, RSMo.1986. He was sentenced by the court as a prior and persistent offender to concurrent prison terms of five years. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no prece-dential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).