Case Name: RIES et al., Respondents, v. STARK, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1905-03-21
Citations: 92 N.Y.S. 1143
Docket Number: 
Parties: RIES et al., Respondents, v. STARK, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 92
Pages: 1143–1143

Head Matter:
RIES et al., Respondents, v. STARK, Appellant.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
March 21, 1905.)
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Fourth District. Action by Charles Ries and another against Rudolph Stark. From a Municipal Court judgment in favor of plaintiffs, defendant appeals. Reversed. Henry A. Doellinger, for appellant. Charles Brandt, Jr., for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The contract relied upon is unilateral, and without consideration or mutuality. In any event, its only purpose was to enable the broker to collect from the seller, and it does not appear that he lost anything by defendant's failure to notify him. The judgment should be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.