Case Name: SEXTON against CRAMER
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1811-11
Citations: 3 N.J.L. 908
Docket Number: 
Parties: SEXTON against CRAMER.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 3
Pages: 467–467

Head Matter:
SEXTON against CRAMER.
OH CERTIORARI.
The action below, was brought by Cramer against Sexton, on the following state of demand:
“ This plaintiff comes into court, and pleads that the defendant is indebted to said plaintiff, $25, by a defraud in contract, by a false representation.”
The insufficiency of this state of demand was assigned for error.
Read, attorney for plaintiff.

Opinion:
By the Court.
The circumstances of fraud and misrepresentation should have been set out.
Judgment reversed.