Case Name: Robert PRIESTER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-07-24
Citations: 51 S.W.3d 873
Docket Number: No. ED 79175
Parties: Robert PRIESTER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., P.J., and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 51
Pages: 873–873

Head Matter:
Robert PRIESTER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 79175.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
July 24, 2001.
Rosalynn Koch, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen ., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., P.J., and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Robert Priester (Movant) appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. Movant contends the motion court erred in denying his post-conviction motion because counsel was ineffective in advising Movant that he did not have the option of filing a motion to withdraw his plea prior to sentencing, with the result that this opportunity was forfeited. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).