Case Name: Edward G. Duffy, complainant and appellant, v. Alfred Hargan et al., defendants and respondents
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1902-06-23
Citations: 63 N.J. Eq. 802
Docket Number: 
Parties: Edward G. Duffy, complainant and appellant, v. Alfred Hargan et al., defendants and respondents.
Judges: For affirmance—The Ci-iiee-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Collins, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Bogert, Krueger, Adams, Vredenburgh, Vooritees, Vroom —15.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 63
Pages: 802–802

Head Matter:
Edward G. Duffy, complainant and appellant, v. Alfred Hargan et al., defendants and respondents.
[Filed June 23d, 1902.]
Mr. James R. Nugent, for the appellant.
Messrs. Sommer & Adams, for the respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated by Vice-Chancellor Stevens in the opinion delivered in the court below. See 17 Dick. Ch. Rep. 588.
For affirmance—The Ci-iiee-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Collins, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Bogert, Krueger, Adams, Vredenburgh, Vooritees, Vroom —15.
For reversal—None.