Case Name: The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Tolbert, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1992-03-04
Citations: 63 Ohio St. 3d 1203
Docket Number: No. 90-2359
Parties: The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Tolbert, Appellant.
Judges: Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 63
Pages: 1203–1203

Head Matter:
The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Tolbert, Appellant.
[Cite as State v. Tolbert (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 1203.]
(No. 90-2359
Submitted January 21, 1992
Decided March 4, 1992.)
Arthur M. Ney, Jr., Prosecuting Attorney, and Ronald W. Springman, for appellee.
H. Fred Hoefle, for appellant.
Randall M. Dana, Ohio Public Defender, and Gregory L. Ayers, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Ohio Public Defender Commission.
Hobson & Kolman and Gordon Hobson, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Ohio Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.

Opinion:
The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.
Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Moyer, C.J., dissents and would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals with an opinion.
Wright, J., dissents.