Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Walter WOODALL, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1935-03-11
Citations: 75 F.2d 1020
Docket Number: No. 7494
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Walter WOODALL, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 75
Pages: 1020–1020

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Walter WOODALL, Appellee.
No. 7494.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
March 11, 1935.
Peirson M. Hall, U. S. Atty., and Hugh L. Dickson, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Los Angeles, Cal., and Will G. Beardslee, Director, Bureau of War Risk Litigation, and Keith L. Seegmiller and Lawrence A. Law-lor, Attys., Department of Justice, all of Washington, D. C., for the United States.
Volney P. Mooney, Jr., and Sylvester Hoffmann, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Before WILBUR, GARRECHT, and DENMAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The record in this case is insufficient to raise the question of the sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment. Continental Nat. Bank v. National City Bank, 69 F.(2d) 312, 317. This is the only matter presented by appellant.
Judgment affirmed.