Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Enrique SOLANO-MACHUCA, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-04-07
Citations: 60 F. App'x 649
Docket Number: No. 02-3511
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Enrique SOLANO-MACHUCA, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 60
Pages: 649–650

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Enrique SOLANO-MACHUCA, Appellant.
No. 02-3511.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted April 4, 2003.
Decided April 7, 2003.
Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, BOWMAN, and WOLLMAN, Circuit Judges.
The Honorable James B. Loken became Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit on April 1, 2003.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Enrique Solano-Machuca pleaded guilty to illegal reentry following deportation after conviction for an aggravated felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1826(a), and the district court sentenced him to 46 months imprisonment and 3 years supervised release. On appeal, counsel moved to withdraw under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and filed a brief arguing that the district court erred in denying Solano-Machuca's motion for downward departure.
We reject Solano-Machuca's argument because we do not review discretionary decisions not to depart where there is no indication the district court believed it lacked the authority to do so. See United States v. Lopez-Arce, 267 F.3d 775, 783-84 (8th Cir.2001). Further, having reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues.
Accordingly, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw, and we affirm.
A true copy.
. The HONORABLE RICHARD G. KOPF, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.