Case Name: J. H. Rafferty, Appellant, v. George A. Gaston, Individually and as Administrator etc., Respondent
Court: Washington Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Washington
Decision Date: 1923-01-02
Citations: 122 Wash. 699
Docket Number: No. 16735
Parties: J. H. Rafferty, Appellant, v. George A. Gaston, Individually and as Administrator etc., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Washington Reports
Volume: 122
Pages: 699–699

Head Matter:
[No. 16735.
En Banc.
January 2, 1923.]
J. H. Rafferty, Appellant, v. George A. Gaston, Individually and as Administrator etc., Respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Thurston county, Wright, J., entered August 9, 1921, upon findings in favor of the defendant, in an action on contract, tried to the court.
Affirmed.
James A. Dougan, for appellant.
Vance & Christensen, for respondent.
Reported in 211 Pac. 766.

Opinion:
On Rehearing.
Per Curiam.
-This cause was reargued before the court En Banc, on December 6, 1922. Deeming ourselves fully advised in the premises, and a majority of the judges being of the opinion that the cause was correctly disposed of by the decision of Department One, reported in 118 Wash. 689, 204 Pac. 595, the judgment is affirmed for the reasons therein stated and as therein directed.