Case Name: Ted KIRSCH, as President and Guardian Ad Litem of the Philadelphia Federation of Teachers and the Philadelphia Federation of Teachers, Petitioners, v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA, Pedro Ramos, President, Board of Education of the School District of Philadelphia, Dorothy Sumners Rush, Vice President of the Board of Education of the School District of Philadelphia, Martin G. Bednarek, The Reverend Ralph E. Blanks, Helen Cunningham, Sandra Dunge Glenn, Christina James Brown, Michael Masch, and Emilio Maticoli, Members of the Board of Education of the School District of Philadelphia, Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2000-10-27
Citations: 762 A.2d 1081
Docket Number: 
Parties: Ted KIRSCH, as President and Guardian Ad Litem of the Philadelphia Federation of Teachers and the Philadelphia Federation of Teachers, Petitioners, v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA, Pedro Ramos, President, Board of Education of the School District of Philadelphia, Dorothy Sumners Rush, Vice President of the Board of Education of the School District of Philadelphia, Martin G. Bednarek, The Reverend Ralph E. Blanks, Helen Cunningham, Sandra Dunge Glenn, Christina James Brown, Michael Masch, and Emilio Maticoli, Members of the Board of Education of the School District of Philadelphia, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 762
Pages: 1081–1081

Head Matter:
Ted KIRSCH, as President and Guardian Ad Litem of the Philadelphia Federation of Teachers and the Philadelphia Federation of Teachers, Petitioners, v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA, Pedro Ramos, President, Board of Education of the School District of Philadelphia, Dorothy Sumners Rush, Vice President of the Board of Education of the School District of Philadelphia, Martin G. Bednarek, The Reverend Ralph E. Blanks, Helen Cunningham, Sandra Dunge Glenn, Christina James Brown, Michael Masch, and Emilio Maticoli, Members of the Board of Education of the School District of Philadelphia, Respondents.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Oct. 27, 2000.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
AND NOW, this 27th day of October, 2000, the Application for A Temporary Restraining Order and Injunctive Relief is hereby denied.