Case Name: Marine Midland Bank, Respondent, v. Edwin J. Stukey et al., Appellants
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1981-11-17
Citations: 55 N.Y.2d 633
Docket Number: 
Parties: Marine Midland Bank, Respondent, v Edwin J. Stukey et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 55
Pages: 633–635

Head Matter:
Marine Midland Bank, Respondent, v Edwin J. Stukey et al., Appellants.
Argued October 13, 1981;
decided November 17, 1981
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Waddie N. Kalil for appellants.
David C. Grow for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (75 AD2d 713). So far as the stay of execution of the judgment pending disposition of the counterclaims is concerned, under all the circumstances, we cannot say that its grant by the Appellate Division was an abuse of discretion as a matter of law (see Chrysler Corp. v Fedders Corp., 51 NY2d 953, 955).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.