Case Name: Shiflett v. City of Cedartown
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1901-12-11
Citations: 114 Ga. 291
Docket Number: 
Parties: Shiflett v. City of Cedartown.
Judges: All the Justices concurring.
Reporter: Georgia Reports
Volume: 114
Pages: 291–291

Head Matter:
Shiflett v. City of Cedartown.
Argued November 11,
Decided December 11, 1901.
Action for damages. Before Judge Janes. Polk superior court. June 12, 1901.
Fielder & Mundy, for plaintiff. Sanders & Davis, for defendant-

Opinion:
Little, J.
The instructions excepted to were, in tlie main, correct statements of well-settled rules of law, and, if in any respect inaccurate, embraced no error which could have operated to the prejudice of the losing party. The requests to charge were, so far as legal and pertinent, covered by the general charge; and the verdict was supported by the evidence. It does not appear -that there was any abuse of discretion in denying a new' trial.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concurring.