Case Name: Benjamin HEYWARD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Warden McKither BODISON, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-02-22
Citations: 466 F. App'x 201
Docket Number: No. 11-7413
Parties: Benjamin HEYWARD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Warden McKither BODISON, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 466
Pages: 201–202

Head Matter:
Benjamin HEYWARD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Warden McKither BODISON, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 11-7413.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 16, 2012.
Decided: Feb. 22, 2012.
Benjamin Heyward, Appellant Pro se. Donald John Zelenka, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Brendan McDonald, Office of the Attorney General of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Remanded by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Benjamin Heyward seeks to appeal the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's report and recommendation and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. Pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1), a notice of appeal in a civil case must be filed with the district court within thirty days after judgment is entered. "[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement." Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007). The district court may, however, extend the filing time if "a party so moves no later than 30 days after the time prescribed by . Rule 4(a) expires" and the party shows excusable neglect or good cause. Fed. R-App. P. 4(a)(5)(A)(i)—(ii).
Heyward filed a notice of appeal in the district court shortly after the expiration of the appeal period but within the excusable neglect period. See Fed. R.App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988). In a letter accompanying the notice of appeal, Heyward stated that his original notice of appeal was returned to him as undeliverable. We construe Heyward's letter as a timely request for an extension of the thirty-day appeal period.
Accordingly, we remand this case to the district court for the limited purpose of enabling the court to determine whether Heyward has shown excusable neglect or good, cause warranting an extension of time to appeal. The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration.
REMANDED.