Case Name: FORSBERG & COMPANY, a Copartnership, etc., v. SEATTLE FIRST NATIONAL BANK et al.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1942-05-11
Citations: 127 F.2d 861
Docket Number: No. 10047
Parties: FORSBERG & COMPANY, a Copartnership, etc., v. SEATTLE FIRST NATIONAL BANK et al.
Judges: Before GARRECHT, HANEY, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 127
Pages: 861–861

Head Matter:
FORSBERG & COMPANY, a Copartnership, etc., v. SEATTLE FIRST NATIONAL BANK et al.
No. 10047.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 11, 1942.
James R. Gates, of Seattle, Wash., and Hogan & Adams, of Aberdeen, Wash., for appellants.
Graham, Howe & Dunn, Hayden, Merritt, Summers & Bucey, and Robbins & Rickies, all of Seattle, Wash., for appellees.
Before GARRECHT, HANEY, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This cause coming before the Court on default of the appellant in failing to make deposit covering estimated expense of printing transcript of record as required by Rule 19 of the Rules of this Court, and it appearing from the files that appellants' counsel have been notified that such default would be called to the Court's attention on this date, and counsel for appellants having indicated that this cause has been settled, ordered appeal herein dismissed for failure of appellants to make deposit as required by Rule 19 of the Rules of this Court, that a judgment be filed and entered accordingly, and that mandate of -this court in this cause issue forthwith.