Case Name: Douglas A. REDLESKI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lawrence MILLER, Judge, Circuit Court of Preston County, West Virginia, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-07-01
Citations: 109 F. App'x 514
Docket Number: No. 04-6340
Parties: Douglas A. REDLESKI, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Lawrence MILLER, Judge, Circuit Court of Preston County, West Virginia, Respondent—Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 109
Pages: 514–514

Head Matter:
Douglas A. REDLESKI, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Lawrence MILLER, Judge, Circuit Court of Preston County, West Virginia, Respondent—Appellee.
No. 04-6340.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted June 24, 2004.
Decided July 1, 2004.
Douglas A. Redleski, Appellant pro se. John M. Hedges, Byrne & Hedges, Morgantown, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Douglas A. Redleski appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Redleski v. Miller, No. CA-03-58-2 (N.D.W.Va. Feb. 10, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED