Case Name: HOLT v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1916-02-09
Citations: 182 S.W. 1119
Docket Number: No. 3948
Parties: HOLT v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 182
Pages: 1119–1119

Head Matter:
HOLT v. STATE.
(No. 3948.)
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Feb. 9, 1916.)
Criminal Law <@=>112íL-Appea:[>-Review— Statement oe Facts.
Where no statement of the evidence on the trial accompanies the record, and no bill of exceptions is contained therein, there is nothing in the motion for a new trial which the Court oí Criminal Appeals can review.
[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2939, 2946-2948; Dec. Dig. <@=j1124.]
Appeal from District Court, Sabine County; A. E. Davis, Judge.
B. N. Holt was convicted of burglary, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
C. C. McDonald, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Opinion:
HARPER, J.
Appellant was convicted of burglary, and his punishment assessed at two years' confinement in the state penitentiary.
No statement of the evidence introduced on the trial of the case accompanies the record; neither does the record contain any bill of exceptions. Under such circumstances, there is nothing presented in the motion for a new trial we can review.
The judgment is affirmed.