Case Name: Ernest James SCHILLING, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-09-18
Citations: 62 S.W.3d 439
Docket Number: No. WD 58922
Parties: Ernest James SCHILLING, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. ULRICH, Presiding Judge, PATRICIA BRECKENRIDGE and JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judges.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 62
Pages: 439–440

Head Matter:
Ernest James SCHILLING, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 58922.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Sept. 18, 2001.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 30, 2001.
Application for Transfer Denied Jan. 22, 2002.
Ernest James Schilling, Colorado Springs, CO, pro se.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Richard A. Starnes, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before ROBERT G. ULRICH, Presiding Judge, PATRICIA BRECKENRIDGE and JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Earnest James Schilling appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an eviden-tiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).