Case Name: Glen C. Whorton, et al., Executors, Estate of F. P. Kirkendall, Petitioners, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent
Court: United States Board of Tax Appeals
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1927-07-29
Citations: 7 B.T.A. 771
Docket Number: Docket No. 3094
Parties: Glen C. Whorton, et al., Executors, Estate of F. P. Kirkendall, Petitioners, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent.
Judges: Considered by Arundell and SteeNhageN.
Reporter: Reports of the United States Board of Tax Appeals
Volume: 7
Pages: 771–773

Head Matter:
Glen C. Whorton, et al., Executors, Estate of F. P. Kirkendall, Petitioners, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent.
Docket No. 3094.
Promulgated July 29, 1927.
John L. Chew, Esq., for the petitioners.
L. G. Mitchell, Esq., for the respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION.
Green:
The petitioner contends, first, that the value placed on 3,365 acres of land situated in Tripp, Mellette, and Todd counties, South Dakota, by the Commissioner, is excessive. The Board has found the value of the land to be $7.50. The petitioner further contends that the widow's interest in the land in South Dakota was not includable in the gross estate of the decedent because by the law of the State of Nebraska, the place of his residence, the interest of the surviving spouse in the lands does not come as a distributive share of the estate but by absolute operation of law, resulting in a vested interest prior to the death of the decedent.
Section 402 of the Sevenue Act of 1921 provides:
That the value of the gross estate of the decedent shall be determined by including the value at the time of his death of all property, real or personal, tangible or intangible, wherever situated—

(b) To the extent of any interest therein of the surviving spouse, existing at the time of the decedent's death as dower, curtesy, or by virtue of a statute creating an estate in lieu of dower or curtesy.
The Board at this time will not attempt to pass on the situation as to the rights of the widow in the State of Nebraska.
The law is well established that in determining the taxability of the widow's interest in her husband's estate, the statutes and rules of decisions in the States where the decedent's property is located, control. Randolph v. Craig, 267 Fed. 993. The real estate in controversy is situated in South Dakota. In that State, dower and cur-tesy have been abolished by statute, section 702, South Dakota Revised Code, 1919. No estate is allowed the husband as tenant by curtesy upon the death of his wife, nor any estate in dower allotted to the wife upon the death of her husband, section 175 ibid. The husband has a right to dispose of by will, every estate and interest in real or personal property to which the heirs, widow, or next of kin might succeed, section 607 ibid. Succession is defined as the coming in of another to take the property of one who dies without disposing of it by will, section 699 ibid. In the event of intestacy, both real and personal property passes to the heirs of the intestate subject to the control of the county court, and to the possession of any administrator appointed by that court for the purpose of administration, section 700 ibid. The laws of the State of South Dakota allow free disposition of all property except the homestead, and as the decedent was not a resident of the State, his right to dispose of the property in question at the time of his death was absolute. The wife had no dower or vested interest. Accordingly the 3,865 acres of land situated in South Dakota were properly included in the gross estate.
Order of redetermination will be entered on 15 days'1 notice, under Rule 50.
Considered by Arundell and SteeNhageN.