Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Allen SMITH, Jr., a/k/a Smitty, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-10-08
Citations: 396 F. App'x 924
Docket Number: No. 09-8091
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Allen SMITH, Jr., a/k/a Smitty, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 396
Pages: 924–924

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Allen SMITH, Jr., a/k/a Smitty, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-8091.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 2, 2010.
Decided: Oct. 8, 2010.
Richard Allen Smith, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Donald Warner, Assistant United States Attorney, Elkins, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Richard Allen Smith, Jr., appeals the district court's "Order Reducing Term of Imprisonment as a Result of Amended Guideline Range Pursuant to [U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § ] 1B1.10 [ (2008) ]." We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Smith, No. 2:00-er-00007-FPS-JES-l (N.D.W.Va. Nov. 3, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.