Case Name: CHRIS SPICCIA, RESPONDENT, v. PATERSON SILK THROWING CO., INC., APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1942-09-18
Citations: 129 N.J.L. 100
Docket Number: 
Parties: CHRIS SPICCIA, RESPONDENT, v. PATERSON SILK THROWING CO., INC., APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 129
Pages: 100–100

Head Matter:
CHRIS SPICCIA, RESPONDENT, v. PATERSON SILK THROWING CO., INC., APPELLANT.
Argued May 19, 1942
Decided September 18, 1942.
For the respondent, Hymen D. Goldberg.
For the appellant, Herman Shapiro.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons' expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Case in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Parker, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Porter, Colie, Dear, Wells, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 12.
For reversal—None.