Case Name: KIRCHBERGER et al. v. AMERICAN ACETYLENE BURNER CO. et al.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1904-09-07
Citations: 132 F. 911
Docket Number: No. 174
Parties: KIRCHBERGER et al. v. AMERICAN ACETYLENE BURNER CO. et al.
Judges: Before LACOMBE, TOWNSEND, and COXE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter
Volume: 132
Pages: 911–911

Head Matter:
KIRCHBERGER et al. v. AMERICAN ACETYLENE BURNER CO. et al.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
September 7, 1904.)
No. 174.
On Petition for Reargument. Mandate amended.
For former opinion, see 128 Fed. 599.
Before LACOMBE, TOWNSEND, and COXE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Petition for rehearing denied, but, to avoid any further misunderstanding as to the disposition of the fourth claim, which was not passed upon by this court, the mandate will be amended so as to affirm the decree as to the first three claims, and dismiss the appeal as to the fourth claim; thus leaving the question of its construction and validity open for future consideration.
The court below is instructed to enter a decree in conformity with this opinion, and with three-quarters costs to complainants.