Case Name: Robert William BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-03-14
Citations: 576 So. 2d 396
Docket Number: No. 90-1646
Parties: Robert William BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: COBB, GRIFFIN and DIAMÍANTIS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 576
Pages: 396–397

Head Matter:
Robert William BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 90-1646.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
March 14, 1991.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and George D.E. Burden, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Anthony J. Golden, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm on authority of Walker v. State, 546 So.2d 764 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989) and certify the same question we certified in Flowers v. State, 567 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990):
DO FLORIDA'S UNIFORM SENTENCING GUIDELINES REQUIRE THAT LEGAL CONSTRAINT POINTS BE AS. SESSED FOR EACH OFFENSE COM MITTED WHILE UNDER LEGAL CONSTRAINT?
COBB, GRIFFIN and DIAMÍANTIS, JJ., concur.