Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William R. TALLEY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-11-15
Citations: 50 F. App'x 164
Docket Number: No. 02-7321
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William R. TALLEY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 50
Pages: 164–165

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William R. TALLEY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-7321.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 7, 2002.
Decided Nov. 15, 2002.
William R. Talley, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard, Office of the United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
William R. Talley seeks to appeal the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude on the reasoning of the district court that Talley has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See United States v. Talley, Nos. CR-99-5S0; CA-01-2420-6-13 (D.S.C. filed July 25, 2002 & entered July 26, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.