Case Name: Kenneth HAYDEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2003-03-26
Citations: 841 So. 2d 580
Docket Number: No. 2D02-3468
Parties: Kenneth HAYDEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SALCINES and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 841
Pages: 580–580

Head Matter:
Kenneth HAYDEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D02-3468.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
March 26, 2003.

Opinion:
SILBERMAN, Judge.
Kenneth Hayden challenges the trial court's order summarily denying his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm. In his motion, Hayden alleged that his plea was involuntary because defense counsel affirmatively misadvised him that his conviction could not be used in the future as a prior offense for sentencing purposes. In Stansel v. State, 825 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), we held that this claim is not cognizable in a rule 3.850 motion. We certify the same question that we certified in Stansel.
Affirmed, question certified.
SALCINES and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.