Case Name: Tania Yadira HERNANDEZ-BARAHONA; et al., Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-01-19
Citations: 362 F. App'x 722
Docket Number: No. 07-72648
Parties: Tania Yadira HERNANDEZ-BARAHONA; et al., Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: BEEZER, TROTT, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 362
Pages: 722–722

Head Matter:
Tania Yadira HERNANDEZ-BARAHONA; et al., Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 07-72648.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 11, 2010.
Filed Jan. 19, 2010.
Tania Yadira Hernandez-Barahona, North Hollywood, CA, pro se.
CAC-District, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
Before: BEEZER, TROTT, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Tania Yadira Hernandez-Barahona, and her two minor children, all natives and citizens of Honduras, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge's decision denying their application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review factual findings for substantial evidence, INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 n. 1, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992) and we deny the petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the BIA's denial of petitioners' asylum and withholding of removal claims, because petitioners' fear of gangs was insufficient to establish that they were or would be persecuted on account of a protected ground. See Ochoa v. Gonzales, 406 F.3d 1166, 1170-72 (9th Cir.2005) (affirming BIA's denial of asylum and withholding of removal where petitioners failed to establish their persecution was on account of social group or imputed political opinion).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.