Case Name: FRENCHMAN, INC., etc., Petitioner, v. DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1986-10-09
Citations: 495 So. 2d 750
Docket Number: No. 67934
Parties: FRENCHMAN, INC., etc., Petitioner, v. DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Respondent.
Judges: BOYD, OVERTON, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 495
Pages: 750–750

Head Matter:
FRENCHMAN, INC., etc., Petitioner, v. DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Respondent.
No. 67934.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Oct. 9, 1986.
Leigh E. Dunston of Gunster, Yoakley, Criser & Stewart, P.A., and Paul A. Turk, Jr. of Paul A. Turk, Jr., P.A., West Palm Beach, for petitioner.
Maxine F. Ferguson and Franz E. Dorn, Appellate Attys., and A.J. Spalla, General Counsel, Dept, of Transp., Tallahassee, for respondent.

Opinion:
McDONALD, Chief Justice.
This Court originally granted review in Division of Administration, Department of Transportation v. Frenchman, Inc., 476 So.2d 224 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), because certain language in that opinion appeared to conflict with prior decisions concerning the quantification of severance damages in eminent domain proceedings. Upon further examination, however, we find the holding in Frenchman to be consistent with precedent. Therefore, because no conflict exists between Frenchman and any opinion from either another district court or this Court, we have no jurisdiction to review the case at bar. Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for review.
It is so ordered.
BOYD, OVERTON, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur.
ADKINS, J., dissents.