Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Christopher SCHMITT, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-07-24
Citations: 190 F. App'x 582
Docket Number: No. 04-50500
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Michael Christopher SCHMITT, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: B. FLETCHER, TROTT and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 190
Pages: 582–583

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Michael Christopher SCHMITT, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 04-50500.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 15, 2006.
Filed July 24, 2006.
Shanna L. Dougherty, USSD — Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Chase Scolnick, FDSD — Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: B. FLETCHER, TROTT and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Michael Christopher Schmitt appeals from the sentence imposed upon him following the revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
We reject Schmitt's contention that the supervised release statute violates the Sixth Amendment. See United States v. Huerta-Pimental, 445 F.3d 1220 (9th Cir. ^006).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.