Case Name: Robert J. DOYLE, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2008-03-12
Citations: 979 So. 2d 1029
Docket Number: No. 3D07-3230
Parties: Robert J. DOYLE, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: Before WELLS, ROTHENBERG, and SALTER, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 979
Pages: 1029–1030

Head Matter:
Robert J. DOYLE, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 3D07-3230.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 12, 2008.
Rehearing Denied April 21, 2008.
Robert J. Doyle, in proper person.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Magaly Rodriguez, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Before WELLS, ROTHENBERG, and SALTER, JJ.

Opinion:
WELLS, J.
On December 17, 2007, Robert J. Doyle filed a pro se Petition for Writ of Mandamus with this court seeking to compel the lower court to rule on his motion to correct an illegal sentence. Pursuant to an order of this court, the State responded that the criminal court docket sheet indicated that such a motion was filed on March 5, 2007, but that neither the trial court nor the State was in possession of the motion. The State also asked that this court recommend to the Department of Corrections that Doyle be sanctioned for filing numerous, frivolous collateral criminal proceedings with respect to his convictions and sentences in this case.
Based on the State's representations that Doyle's post-conviction motion cannot be located, we deny the petition without prejudice to file a new post-conviction mo tion in the lower court. We decline to recommend to the Department of Corrections that it sanction the defendant at this time. However, upon reviewing the recent flurry of meritless, successive, pro se filings challenging his convictions and sentences in this case, we caution the defendant that the continued filing of frivolous or abusive papers may not only result in a future recommendation to the Department of Corrections that it bring disciplinary procedures against him under paragraph 944.28(2)(a) and section 944.279, Florida Statutes (2007), but also a prohibition against any further pro se filings in this court. See O'Haver v. State, 944 So.2d 498 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); Johnson v. State, 915 So.2d 682 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005).
Petition denied.