Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Randy Scott RADER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-03-24
Citations: 371 F. App'x 412
Docket Number: No. 09-8242
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Randy Scott RADER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 371
Pages: 412–413

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Randy Scott RADER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-8242.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 16, 2010.
Decided: March 24, 2010.
Randy Scott Rader, Appellant Pro Se. Zachary T. Lee, Assistant United States Attorney, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Randy Scott Rader appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion for a reduction in sentencing. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Rader, No. 1:04-cr-00071-jpj-l, 2009 WL 3667075 (W.D.Va. Nov. 4, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.