Case Name: Marcel KIMELMAN and Aron Kalisz, Appellants, v. Alfred ELLENBOGEN and Evelyn S. Ellenbogen, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-04-10
Citations: 559 So. 2d 384
Docket Number: No. 89-1197
Parties: Marcel KIMELMAN and Aron Kalisz, Appellants, v. Alfred ELLENBOGEN and Evelyn S. Ellenbogen, Appellees.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and JORGENSON and LEVY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 559
Pages: 384–385

Head Matter:
Marcel KIMELMAN and Aron Kalisz, Appellants, v. Alfred ELLENBOGEN and Evelyn S. Ellenbogen, Appellees.
No. 89-1197.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 10, 1990.
Donald S. Rose, Miami, for appellants.
Hoffman, Larin & Agnetti and Martin L. Hoffman, North Miami Beach, for appel-lees.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and JORGENSON and LEVY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The summary judgment under review is set aside and the cause remanded for the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing and to make a finding as to whether the motion and notice of hearing was actually timely received by counsel for the ap pellants. See Hammett v. Hammett, 510 So.2d 632 (Fla.3d DCA 1987); Moses v. Bystrom, 489 So.2d 834 (Fla.3d DCA 1986). If timely notice was received, the judgment shall be reinstated. If there is a determination to the contrary, the judgment shall remain vacated. Moses v. Bystrom, 489 So.2d at 836.