Case Name: The People of the State of New York ex rel. Arthur A. Wannamaker, Appellant, v. J. Edwin La Vallee, as Warden of Clinton Prison, Respondent; The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Steven Sweet, Appellant; The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Leon Frank Parker, Jr., Appellant; The People of the State of New York ex rel. David Allen, Appellant, v. Walter M. Wallack, as Warden of Wallkill Prison, Respondent; The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jean Paul Herbert, Appellant; The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Clarence Bushnoe, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1962-11-16
Citations: 17 A.D.2d 997
Docket Number: 
Parties: (A) The People of the State of New York ex rel. Arthur A. Wannamaker, Appellant, v. J. Edwin La Vallee, as Warden of Clinton Prison, Respondent. (B) The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Steven Sweet, Appellant. (C) The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Leon Frank Parker, Jr., Appellant. (D) The People of the State of New York ex rel. David Allen, Appellant, v. Walter M. Wallack, as Warden of Wallkill Prison, Respondent. (E) The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jean Paul Herbert, Appellant. (F) The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Clarence Bushnoe, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 17
Pages: 997–997

Head Matter:
(A) The People of the State of New York ex rel. Arthur A. Wannamaker, Appellant, v. J. Edwin La Vallee, as Warden of Clinton Prison, Respondent. (B) The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Steven Sweet, Appellant. (C) The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Leon Frank Parker, Jr., Appellant. (D) The People of the State of New York ex rel. David Allen, Appellant, v. Walter M. Wallack, as Warden of Wallkill Prison, Respondent. (E) The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jean Paul Herbert, Appellant. (F) The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Clarence Bushnoe, Appellant.

Opinion:
[In each action] Permission to prosecute appeal as poor persons granted. Appeal may be perfected upon one typewritten copy of the records and five typewritten copies of the briefs. Motion in all other respects denied.