Case Name: Commonwealth of Virginia v. Jeramie Michael Baker
Court: Supreme Court of Virginia
Jurisdiction: Virginia
Decision Date: 1999-06-11
Citations: 258 Va. 1
Docket Number: Record No. 982102
Parties: Commonwealth of Virginia v. Jeramie Michael Baker
Judges: 
Reporter: Virginia Reports
Volume: 258
Pages: 1–2

Head Matter:
Commonwealth of Virginia v. Jeramie Michael Baker
Record No. 982102
June 11, 1999
Present: All the Justices
Michael T. Judge, Assistant Attorney General (Mark L. Earley, Attorney General, on briefs), for appellant.
Clifford Y. Rose (Rose & Wall, on brief), for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
In this appeal, the Court reviews a judgment of the Court of Appeals declaring the transfer of jurisdiction from a juvenile and domestic relations district court to a circuit court ineffectual and the subsequent convictions void. Baker v. Commonwealth, 28 Va. App. 306, 504 S.E.2d 394 (1998).
Central to the decision below was the interpretation of Code § 16.1-263(A), which provides, in part, that after a juvenile petition is filed, the court shall direct summonses "to the parents" of the juvenile. Here, even though the juvenile's mother received notice, the juvenile's biological father was not notified, there was no attempt to give him notice, and the circuit court made no certification on the record that the identity of the father was not reasonably ascertainable.
Parenthetically, we note the statute has been amended effective July 1, 1999 to provide for notice to "at least one parent." Acts 1999, ch. 952.
For the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, we will affirm the court's judgment.
Furthermore, we decline the Attorney General's request that we apply this judgment prospectively only; retrospective application is mandated by Gogley v. Peyton, 208 Va. 679, 160 S.E.2d 746 (1968).
Affirmed.