Case Name: Virginia Dumlao TANIGUCHI, Petitioner-Appellant, v. John Paul SCHULTZ; Kathleen Hawy Sawyer; Doris Meissner; John Ashcroft, Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees; Virginia Agustin Taniguchi, Petitioner, v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-06-18
Citations: 332 F.3d 1205
Docket Number: Nos. 00-16928, 00-71053
Parties: Virginia Dumlao TANIGUCHI, Petitioner-Appellant, v. John Paul SCHULTZ; Kathleen Hawy Sawyer; Doris Meissner; John Ashcroft, Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees. Virginia Agustin Taniguchi, Petitioner, v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before RONEY, HUG, THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 332
Pages: 1205–1208

Head Matter:
Virginia Dumlao TANIGUCHI, Petitioner-Appellant, v. John Paul SCHULTZ; Kathleen Hawy Sawyer; Doris Meissner; John Ashcroft, Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees. Virginia Agustin Taniguchi, Petitioner, v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General, Respondent.
Nos. 00-16928, 00-71053.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Filed June 18, 2003.
Virginia Dumlao Taniguchi, Marysville, CA, pro se.
Jocelyn Burton, Robert Yeargin, USSF' — Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Francisco, CA, Linda S. Wernery, DOJ— U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., for Respondent-Appellee.
Before RONEY, HUG, THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Honorable Paul H. Roney, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Eleventh Circuit, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
Order; Dissent by Judge PREGERSON.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judge Thomas has voted to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc and Judges Roney and Hug have so recommended.
The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are denied.