Case Name: Timothy MALCOLM, Plaintiff, v. Janet RENO, Attorney General, United States Department of Justice, Defendant
Court: United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2000-11-13
Citations: 129 F. Supp. 2d 13
Docket Number: No. CIV.A. 00-0178-LFO
Parties: Timothy MALCOLM, Plaintiff, v. Janet RENO, Attorney General, United States Department of Justice, Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Supplement 2d
Volume: 129
Pages: 13–13

Head Matter:
Timothy MALCOLM, Plaintiff, v. Janet RENO, Attorney General, United States Department of Justice, Defendant.
No. CIV.A. 00-0178-LFO.
United States District Court, District of Columbia.
Nov. 13, 2000.
Mona Lyons, Clifford, Lyons & Garde, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff.
Fred E. Haynes, Mark Nagle, Wilma Lewis, Assistant United States Attorney, Washington, DC., for Defendant.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
OBERDORFER, District Judge.
After briefing and extensive arguments in court and in telephone conferences, an October 19, 2000 Order granted plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction for reasons explained in an accompanying memorandum. An October 25, 2000 Amended Order set a $1,500 bond. The parties have now briefed plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment and equitable relief, leaving the issue of plaintiffs de novo challenge to a Department of Justice decision concerning compensatory damages for future consideration. Compare Malcolm v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, Agency Complaint No. F-96-4828 (November 17, 1999), with Malcolm v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, Agency Complaint No. F-96-4828 (May 3, 1999). Nothing in the summary judgment pleadings effectively challenges the findings supporting the October 19, 2000 preliminary injunction or the reasons for it. Those findings and conclusions are hereby ratified. An accompanying order reiterates the preliminary injunction in final form.