Case Name: In the Interest of D.E., J.E., and K.E., children. L.E., Appellant, v. Department of Children and Family Services, and Guardian Ad Litem Program, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2012-10-26
Citations: 101 So. 3d 382
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Interest of D.E., J.E., and K.E., children. L.E., Appellant, v. Department of Children and Family Services, and Guardian Ad Litem Program, Appellees.
Judges: LaROSE and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 101
Pages: 382–383

Head Matter:
In the Interest of D.E., J.E., and K.E., children. L.E., Appellant, v. Department of Children and Family Services, and Guardian Ad Litem Program, Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Oct. 26, 2012.
J.L. “Ray” LeGrande of LeGrande & LeGrande, P.A., Fort Myers, for Appellant.
Jeffrey Dana Gillen, Statewide Appeals Director, West Palm Beach, for Appellee Department of Children and Family Services.
Kelly Schaeffer, Statewide Guardian Ad Litem Office, Tavares, for Appellee Guardian Ad Litem Program.

Opinion:
KHOUZAM, Judge.
L.E., the Mother, appeals two final judgments terminating her parental rights to her three children. The judgments were entered following a single trial addressing her rights to all three children.
On appeal, L.E. argues that the evidence was insufficient to support termination under section 39.806(l)(e), Florida Statutes (2010). We disagree. The final judgment of termination is supported by competent, substantial evidence introduced at trial. Consequently, the trial court did not err in terminating the Mother's parental rights and we must affirm.
Judgments affirmed.
LaROSE and BLACK, JJ., Concur.