Case Name: P. W. Waterbury, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Florida, Defendant in Error
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1933-01-18
Citations: 108 Fla. 115
Docket Number: 
Parties: P. W. Waterbury, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Florida, Defendant in Error.
Judges: 
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 108
Pages: 115–116

Head Matter:
P. W. Waterbury, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Florida, Defendant in Error.
145 So. 879.
Division A.
Opinion filed January 18, 1933.
C. S. Ellis, for Plaintiff in Error.
Cary D. Landis, Attorney General, and Roy Campbell, Assistant, for the State.

Opinion:
Davis, C. J.
Plaintiff in Error, P. W. Waterbury, a sixty-two year old man, was convicted of the offense of having feloniously ravished and carnally known one Winona Cox, a female child, of the age of nine years. Section 7153 C. G. L. 5051 R. G. S. The jury recommended mercy so the court sentenced him to life imprisonment. The sole contention on this writ of error is that the evidence adduced is legally insufficient to sustain the charge made.
There is in the record the direct testimony of the victimized child to the effect that the defendant committed the offense on her. In addition to this the record further shows that the defendant communicated to his victim a venereal disease from which she was found to be suffering at the time of the discovery that she had been wronged. There is further testimony to the effect that the defendant admitted to police officers, and before the Justice of the Peace, that he had done the acts the little girl testified to with respect to the violation of her person. The evidence is ample to sustain the verdict, and no harmful errors of procedure having been shown, the conviction must be affirmed.
Affirmed.
Whitfield, Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.