Case Name: Giles et al. v. Hawkeye Gold-Mining Co. et al.
Court: South Dakota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: South Dakota
Decision Date: 1898-10-18
Citations: 11 S.D. 222
Docket Number: 
Parties: Giles et al. v. Hawkeye Gold-Mining Co. et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Dakota Reports
Volume: 11
Pages: 222–223

Head Matter:
Giles et al. v. Hawkeye Gold-Mining Co. et al.
When a case is submitted, on the abstract of appellant, and neither party ma,kes an argument or files a brief, it will be presumed that the appeal is abandoned.
(Opinion filed October 18, 1898.)
Appeal from circuit court, Lawrence county. -Hon. A. J. Plowman, Judge.
Action by William Giles and others against the Hawkeye Gold-Mining 'Company and others. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant Anson Higby appeals.
Affirmed.
No briefs filed.

Opinion:
Fuller, J.
This case was submitted on the abstract of appelant at the October, 1897 term, and neither party has made an argument or filed a brief. Ruled by Benedict v. Smith, 10 S. D, 35, 71 N. W. 139, it is presumed that the appeal is abandoned, and the order appealed from is affirmed.