Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Reynaldo CHAVEZ-VILLEGAS, also known as Reynaldo Villegas Chavez, also known as Reynaldo Chavez Villegas, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-08-20
Citations: 539 F. App'x 383
Docket Number: No. 12-20704
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Reynaldo CHAVEZ-VILLEGAS, also known as Reynaldo Villegas Chavez, also known as Reynaldo Chavez Villegas, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 539
Pages: 383–383

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Reynaldo CHAVEZ-VILLEGAS, also known as Reynaldo Villegas Chavez, also known as Reynaldo Chavez Villegas, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-20704
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 20, 2013.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Molly Estelle Odom, Esq., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Reynaldo Chavez-Villegas has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Chavez-Villegas has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Chavez-Villegas's response. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th CiR. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.