Case Name: HIRAM SNYDER AND WILLIAM H. HENDRICKSON, PARTNERS, &c., DEPENDANTS IN ERROR, v. NEW YORK CENTRAL AND HUDSON RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1905-11-20
Citations: 72 N.J.L. 262
Docket Number: 
Parties: HIRAM SNYDER AND WILLIAM H. HENDRICKSON, PARTNERS, &c., DEPENDANTS IN ERROR, v. NEW YORK CENTRAL AND HUDSON RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Judges: For affirmance — Ti-ie Chancellor, Chief Justice, Dixon, Garrison, Port, Garretson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Yroom, Green, Gray. 13.
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 72
Pages: 262–263

Head Matter:
HIRAM SNYDER AND WILLIAM H. HENDRICKSON, PARTNERS, &c., DEPENDANTS IN ERROR, v. NEW YORK CENTRAL AND HUDSON RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Submitted March 27th, 1905
Decided November 20th, 1905.
This case is controlled by Gardner & Meeks Co. v. New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Co., decided by this court at the present term.
On error to the Hudson County Circuit Court.
For the plaintiff in error, Edmund W. Wakelee and Vredenburgh, Wall & Van Winkle.
For the defendants in error,- Cornelius E or emus.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The questions raised in this ease are the same as those raised in Gardner & Meeks Company v. New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, decided by this court at the present term (ante ¶. 257). The judgment under review herein will be affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Pitney in that case.
For affirmance — Ti-ie Chancellor, Chief Justice, Dixon, Garrison, Port, Garretson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Yroom, Green, Gray. 13.
For reversal — -None.