Case Name: Stanley Lorenzo WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Theodis BECK, Sec. of Correction; Scotland County Superior Court, Respondents-Appellees; Stanley Lorenzo Williams, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert W. Smith, Superintendent; Theodis Beck, Secretary of Corrections, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-09-05
Citations: 539 F. App'x 183
Docket Number: Nos. 13-6731, 13-6736
Parties: Stanley Lorenzo WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Theodis BECK, Sec. of Correction; Scotland County Superior Court, Respondents-Appellees. Stanley Lorenzo Williams, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert W. Smith, Superintendent; Theodis Beck, Secretary of Corrections, Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: Before KING, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 539
Pages: 183–184

Head Matter:
Stanley Lorenzo WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Theodis BECK, Sec. of Correction; Scotland County Superior Court, Respondents-Appellees. Stanley Lorenzo Williams, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert W. Smith, Superintendent; Theodis Beck, Secretary of Corrections, Respondents-Appellees.
Nos. 13-6731, 13-6736.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 27, 2013.
Decided: Sept. 5, 2013.
Stanley Lorenzo Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Carla Hollis, Assistant Attorney General, Clarence Joe DelForge, III, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before KING, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Stanley Lorenzo Williams challenges the district court's order denying his letter/motion dated February 20, 2013. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of ap-pealability, and dismiss the appeals. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.