Case Name: Monica GAVIN and Lucia Carezani, Executrix of the Estate of James Gavin, Deceased, Petitioners v. Elaine LOEFFELBEIN, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2017-11-28
Citations: 174 A.3d 1028
Docket Number: No. 382 MAL 2017
Parties: Monica GAVIN and Lucia Carezani, Executrix of the Estate of James Gavin, Deceased, Petitioners v. Elaine LOEFFELBEIN, Respondent
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 174
Pages: 1028–1028

Head Matter:
Monica GAVIN and Lucia Carezani, Executrix of the Estate of James Gavin, Deceased, Petitioners v. Elaine LOEFFELBEIN, Respondent
No. 382 MAL 2017
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
November 28, 2017

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 28th day of November, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the issues rephrased for clarity and set forth below:
1. Did the Superior Court err by holding emergency guardianship orders automatically expire?
2. Did the Superior Court err by holding that the rebuttable presumption that an incapacitated person is unable to engage in financial transactions is inapplicable to a person under the protection of an emergency guardian who has been appointed for the person and his estate?
Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues.