Case Name: Glenda ROOKS, Appellant, v. NEW PRIME, INC., and Division of Employment Security, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2014-06-10
Citations: 441 S.W.3d 153
Docket Number: No. ED 100626
Parties: Glenda ROOKS, Appellant, v. NEW PRIME, INC., and Division of Employment Security, Respondent.
Judges: Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 441
Pages: 153–153

Head Matter:
Glenda ROOKS, Appellant, v. NEW PRIME, INC., and Division of Employment Security, Respondent.
No. ED 100626.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
June 10, 2014.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 28, 2014.
Application for Transfer Denied Sept. 30, 2014.
Bryan E. Brody, Gusdorf Law Firm, LLC, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Larry R. Ruhmann, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Glenda Rooks ("Claimant") appeals from the decision of the Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission ("Commission") that dismissed Claimant's application for review pursuant to Section 288.200, RSMo, because it was untimely. Claimant had been requesting review of the Appeals Tribunal's decision denying her unemployment benefits because Claimant voluntarily separated from work without good cause attributable to the work or the employer. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).