Case Name: David ATKINS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Khairul B. EMRAM, Doctor; Samuel V. Pruett, Warden; Harvard W. Stephens, O.H.S. Medical Director; Linda Shear, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-12-07
Citations: 403 F. App'x 877
Docket Number: No. 10-6915
Parties: David ATKINS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Khairul B. EMRAM, Doctor; Samuel V. Pruett, Warden; Harvard W. Stephens, O.H.S. Medical Director; Linda Shear, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 403
Pages: 877–878

Head Matter:
David ATKINS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Khairul B. EMRAM, Doctor; Samuel V. Pruett, Warden; Harvard W. Stephens, O.H.S. Medical Director; Linda Shear, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 10-6915.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 30, 2010.
Decided: Dec. 7, 2010.
David Atkins, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Kathryn Anne Grace, Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP, McLean, Virginia; John Michael Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
David Atkins, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible eiTor. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Atkins v. Emram, No. 1:09-cv-00839-LMB-IDD, 2010 WL 2490965 (E.D. Va. June 17, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.