Case Name: Chun He LI, Petitioner v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-02-02
Citations: 396 F.3d 1073
Docket Number: No. 02-72689
Parties: Chun He LI, Petitioner v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: FARRIS, NOONAN, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 396
Pages: 1073–1074

Head Matter:
Chun He LI, Petitioner v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 02-72689.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Filed Feb. 2, 2005.
Bruno J. Bembi, Esq., Hempstead, NY, for Petitioner.
Regional Counsel, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Legal Officer, San Francisco, CA, Norah Ascoli Schwarz, Esq., Washington, DC, Cindy S. Ferrier, Los Angeles, CA, David V. Bernal, Attorney, Ernesto H. Molina, Jr., Earle B. Wilson, Esq., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: FARRIS, NOONAN, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dissent by Judge HAWKINS.
ORDER
A judge sua sponte called for rehearing en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35(b). Accordingly, the sua sponte call for rehearing en banc is rejected.
The mandate shall issue in due course.