Case Name: Jack F. DURIE, Jr., Appellant, v. In re GUARDIANSHIP OF Mary Nugent DURIE, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1998-02-25
Citations: 706 So. 2d 405
Docket Number: Nos. 97-2798, 97-752 and 97-375
Parties: Jack F. DURIE, Jr., Appellant, v. In re GUARDIANSHIP OF Mary Nugent DURIE, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GREEN and SHEVIN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 706
Pages: 405–405

Head Matter:
Jack F. DURIE, Jr., Appellant, v. In re GUARDIANSHIP OF Mary Nugent DURIE, Appellee.
Nos. 97-2798, 97-752 and 97-375.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 25, 1998.
Rehearing Denied March 25, 1998.
Caruso, Burlington, Bohn & Compiani and Russel S. Bohn, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
H. Hugh McConnell, Coral Gables; David Howard Goldberg, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GREEN and SHEVIN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the orders awarding attorney's fees and the Order on Special Master's Report. The court correctly determined that appellant had no standing, McGinnis v. Kanevsky, 564 So.2d 1141 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), and properly precluded any further pro se pleadings by appellant. See Attwood v. Singletary, 661 So.2d 1216, 1217 (Fla.1995)(court has inherent authority to prevent abuse of judicial system).
Affirmed.