Case Name: SEA "B" MINING COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Maudia ROWE, widow of Perry Rowe; Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, Respondents
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-08-22
Citations: 195 F. App'x 131
Docket Number: No. 05-2142
Parties: SEA “B” MINING COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Maudia ROWE, widow of Perry Rowe; Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, Respondents.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 195
Pages: 131–131

Head Matter:
SEA “B” MINING COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Maudia ROWE, widow of Perry Rowe; Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, Respondents.
No. 05-2142.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 31, 2006.
Decided: Aug. 22, 2006.
Timothy Ward Gresham, Penn, Stuart & Eskridge, Abingdon, Virginia, for Petitioner. Maudia Rowe, Respondent Pro Se. Rita A. Roppolo, Christian P. Barber, United States Department of Labor, Washington, D.C., for Respondent Director.
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Sea "B" Mining Company seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's award of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. § 901-945 (2000). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the Board. Rowe v. Sea "B" Mining Co., No. 04-950-BLA (BRB Aug. 12, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.