Case Name: Marion Seay, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Florida, Defendant in Error
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1929-11-20
Citations: 98 Fla. 979
Docket Number: 
Parties: Marion Seay, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Florida, Defendant in Error.
Judges: Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 98
Pages: 979–979

Head Matter:
Marion Seay, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Florida, Defendant in Error.
Division B.
Decision filed November 20, 1929.
Petition for rehearing denied December 18, 1929.
Clyde E. Mayhall, for Plaintiff in Error;
Fred H. Davis, Attorney General, and Roy Campbell, Assistant, for the State.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, ánd the record having been "seen and inspected, and the Court being. now advised of its judgment to be given in 'the premises, it seems "to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.