Case Name: Jo Anne JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-03-10
Citations: 123 F. App'x 107
Docket Number: No. 04-2290
Parties: Jo Anne JOHNSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 123
Pages: 107–108

Head Matter:
Jo Anne JOHNSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 04-2290.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 18, 2005.
Decided March 10, 2005.
Jo Anne Johnson, Appellant pro se. David J. Cortes, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Jo Anne Johnson appeals the district court's order granting the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration's ("Commissioner") motion for judgment and affirming the Commissioner's denial of supplemental security income benefits. We must uphold the decision to deny benefits if the decision is supported by substantial evidence and the correct law was applied. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2000); Craig v. Chater, 76 F.3d 585, 589 (4th Cir.1996). Having thoroughly reviewed the administrative record, we agree with the district court that substantial evidence supports the Commissioner's final decision denying supplemental security income benefits. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Johnson v. Barnhart, No. CA-03-60-2-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 6, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED