Case Name: In re LANE LUMBER CO., Limited. BOYD v. WALL
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1914-08-17
Citations: 217 F. 555
Docket Number: No. 2364
Parties: In re LANE LUMBER CO., Limited. BOYD v. WALL.
Judges: Before GILBERT and ROSS, Circuit Judges, and YAN FLEET, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter
Volume: 217
Pages: 555–555

Head Matter:
In re LANE LUMBER CO., Limited. BOYD v. WALL.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
August 17, 1914.)
No. 2364.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Idaho, Northern Division; Frank S. Dietrich, Judge.
In the matter'of the Lane Lumber Company, Limited, bankrupt. Appeal by Samuel L. Boyd, trustee, from an order (210 Fed. 82), allowing the claim of Mary Wall to a vendor’s lien.
Affirmed.
See, also, 217 Fed. 546, 550, 133 C. C. A. 398, 402.
33. N. La Veine, of Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, for appellant.
John II. Wourms, of Wallace, Idaho, amicus curise.
Frank Langley, of Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, for appellee.
Before GILBERT and ROSS, Circuit Judges, and YAN FLEET, District Judge.

Opinion:
VAN FLEET, District Judge.
This, like case No. 2363 (Boyd v. M. K. Wall, 217 Fed. 550) just decided, is an appeal from a judgment affirming the order of tlie referee awarding a vendor's lien upon property of the bankrupt, and arises out of the same bankruptcy proceeding. Excepting only as to the traet of land involved and the date -of sale, the material facts are not to bo distinguished in legal effect from those in the last-mentioned ease; and, as the appeal is submitted practically upon the briefs in that case and no new points are urged, no'further discussion is required, hut the judgment may be affirmed on the authority of the opinion filed in that case.
It is so ordered.