Case Name: BARSON et al. v. MULLIGAN et al.
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1909-06-18
Citations: 117 N.Y.S. 723
Docket Number: 
Parties: BARSON et al. v. MULLIGAN et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 117
Pages: 723–725

Head Matter:
BARSON et al. v. MULLIGAN et al.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
June 18, 1909.)
Appeal from Trial Term, New York County.
Action by Charles H. Barson and another against Agnes K. Murphy-Mulligan and another. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.
Affirmed.
See, also, 191 N. Y. 306, 84 N. E. 75, 16 L. R. A. (N. S.) 151.
Argued before INGRAHAM, McLAUGHLIN, LAUGHLIN, CLARKE, and SCOTT, JJ.
William G. Mulligan, for appellants.
Henry A. Forster (Fredrick P. Forster, on the brief), for respondents.

Opinion:
INGRAHAM, J.
The effect of the interview between the defendant and one of the plaintiffs was not before the Court of Appeals when the case was in that court. I do not think that, on the testimony as it stands, there was a sufficient consent to entitle the holder of the mortgage to bé treated as a mortgagee in possession,.applying the rule laid down on the former appeal by the Court of Appeals. 191 N. Y. 306, 84 N. E. 75, 16 L. R. A. (N. S.) 151.
The judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs.
McLAUGHLIN and SCOTT, JJ., concur.