Case Name: GEIGER, Respondent, v. ROSENBERG et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1906-11-14
Citations: 101 N.Y.S. 1122
Docket Number: 
Parties: GEIGER, Respondent, v. ROSENBERG et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 101
Pages: 1122–1122

Head Matter:
GEIGER, Respondent, v. ROSENBERG et al., Appellants.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
November 14, 1906.)
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Ninth District. Action by Aehille Geiger against Max Rosenberg and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal. Affirmed. Nadal, Carrere & Jones, for appellants. Edward Stetson Griffing, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The evidence of the janitor that prior to the accident he saw the hole into which the plaintiff fell was, under the circumstances, sufficient to warrant a finding of negligence by defendants. Judgment affirmed, with costs.