Case Name: Larry WEBER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-09-06
Citations: 178 S.W.3d 564
Docket Number: No. ED 85574
Parties: Larry WEBER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before NANNETTE A. BAKER, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 178
Pages: 564–565

Head Matter:
Larry WEBER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 85574.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Sept. 6, 2005.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Dec. 7, 2005.
Scott Thompson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Ronald S. Ribaudo, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before NANNETTE A. BAKER, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Larry Weber (Appellant) appeals from the motion court's denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court did not err in denying Appellant's Rule 24.035 motion. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2004, unless otherwise indicated.