Case Name: In the Matter of Dissolution of the Marriage of WELLS, Respondent, Cross-Appellant, and WELLS, Appellant, Cross-respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1976-04-26
Citations: 25 Or. App. 273
Docket Number: No. 6565, CA 4954
Parties: In the Matter of Dissolution of the Marriage of WELLS, Respondent, Cross-Appellant, and WELLS, Appellant, Cross-respondent.
Judges: Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Foley and Lee, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 25
Pages: 273–273

Head Matter:
Argued March 15,
affirmed April 26, 1976
In the Matter of Dissolution of the Marriage of WELLS, Respondent, Cross-Appellant, and WELLS, Appellant, Cross-respondent.
(No. 6565, CA 4954)
548 P2d 514
Richard G. Helzer, Portland, argued the cause for appellant cross-respondent. With him on the briefs was William F. Thomas, Portland.
Allyn E. Brown, Newberg, argued the cause for respondent cross-appellant. With him on the brief were Brown & Tarlow, Newberg.
Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Foley and Lee, Judges.

Opinion:
FOLEY, J.
Both parties have appealed from the decree in this dissolution suit. The contentions involve the division of property between the parties, the reasonableness of the support allowance for a child and the allowance of attorney fees.
The trial of this case occupied three days and involved voluminous documentary and oral evidence, including books and records as well as expert testimony of appraisers and accountants.
Having reviewed the record de novo, we conclude that we cannot improve upon the division of property and other determinations made by the trial court.
Affirmed. Costs to neither party.