Case Name: Raymundo LIRA-NOGUERON; et al., Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-04-29
Citations: 324 F. App'x 662
Docket Number: No. 08-70695
Parties: Raymundo LIRA-NOGUERON; et al., Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: GRABER, GOULD, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 324
Pages: 662–662

Head Matter:
Raymundo LIRA-NOGUERON; et al., Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 08-70695.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 13, 2009.
Filed April 29, 2009.
Joubin Nasseri, Nasseri Law Group, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioners.
CAC-District Counsel, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Sharon Michele Clay, Esquire, Trial, Richard M. Evans, Esquire, Assistant Director, Stacy Stiffel Paddack, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
Before: GRABER, GOULD, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Raymundo Lira-Nogueron and his wife Gloria Poa-Garcia, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying, as untimely filed, their motion to reopen the underlying denial of their application for cancellation of removal.
Petitioners have waived any challenge to the BIA's order denying their motion to reopen by failing to raise any arguments related to the BIA's dispositive determination that the motion to reopen was untimely. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.