Case Name: In the Matter of Robert Amsterdam et al., Respondents, v. David T. Goldstick et al., Appellants, and Department of Housing Preservation and Development of the City of New York, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1988-10-25
Citations: 72 N.Y.2d 1031
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Robert Amsterdam et al., Respondents, v David T. Goldstick et al., Appellants, and Department of Housing Preservation and Development of the City of New York, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 72
Pages: 1031–1031

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Robert Amsterdam et al., Respondents, v David T. Goldstick et al., Appellants, and Department of Housing Preservation and Development of the City of New York, Respondent.
Decided October 25, 1988

Opinion:
Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals sua sponte, upon the ground that a direct appeal does not lie (NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b]; CPLR 5601).