Case Name: Orlando A. LEE, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Brian CENTER, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-09-13
Citations: 478 F. App'x 25
Docket Number: No. 12-1749
Parties: Orlando A. LEE, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Brian CENTER, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 478
Pages: 25–26

Head Matter:
Orlando A. LEE, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Brian CENTER, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 12-1749.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 11, 2012.
Decided: Sept. 13, 2012.
Orlando A. Lee, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Orlando A. Lee, Sr., appeals the district court's order construing his motion to re open his case as a FecLR.Civ.P. 60(b) motion and denying the motion. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Lee's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. Accordingly, we deny Lee's motion for a transcript at the government's expense and affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.