Case Name: Carey FAUST, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bill MASSEE, J. Perry, et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-04-30
Citations: 222 F. App'x 950
Docket Number: No. 05-14930
Parties: Carey FAUST, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bill MASSEE, J. Perry, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before DUBINA and BLACK, Circuit Judges, and LIMBAUGH, District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 222
Pages: 950–950

Head Matter:
Carey FAUST, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bill MASSEE, J. Perry, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 05-14930.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
April 30, 2007.
Courtland L. Reichman, King & Spalding, LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Jason C. Waymire, Terry Eugene Williams, Terry E. Williams & Associates, P.C., Lawrenceville, GA, for DefendantsAppellees.
Before DUBINA and BLACK, Circuit Judges, and LIMBAUGH, District Judge.
Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
This is an appeal from the district court's grant of summary judgment in Carey Faust's pro se civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging violations of the Eighth Amendment and the American with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq.
The issues presented on appeal are (1) whether the district court erred in granting summary judgment on Faust's claim of deliberate indifference to his medical needs; and (2) whether the district court erred in granting summary judgment on Faust's claim that his rights under the ADA were violated.
We review the district court's grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same legal standards as the district court. McCormick v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 333 F.3d 1234, 1242-43 (11th Cir.2003). Summary judgment is appropriate if the evidence establishes "no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law." Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c); McCormick, 333 F.3d at 1243. The evidence, and all reasonable inferences, must be viewed in the light most favorable to the non-movant, here Faust. McCormick, 333 F.3d at 1243.
After reviewing the record, reading the parties' briefs and having the benefit of oral argument, we conclude that there is no merit to any of the arguments Faust makes in this appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's grant of summary judgment on all of Faust's claims.
AFFIRMED.