Case Name: Timothy BART, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-09-07
Citations: 142 S.W.3d 236
Docket Number: No. WD 63352
Parties: Timothy BART, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before JAMES M. SMART, Presiding Judge, JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge and LISA WHITE HARDWICK, Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 142
Pages: 236–237

Head Matter:
Timothy BART, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 63352.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Sept. 7, 2004.
Andrew A. Schroeder, Kansas City, for appellant.
Deborah Daniels, Assisant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before JAMES M. SMART, Presiding Judge, JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge and LISA WHITE HARDWICK, Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Timothy Bart appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value but a memorandum explain ing our reasoning has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).