Case Name: Remsen, Administratrix, against Isaacs
Court: New York Supreme Court of Judicature
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1803-05
Citations: 1 Cai. 22b
Docket Number: 
Parties: Remsen, Administratrix, against Isaacs.
Judges: 
Reporter: Caines' Reports
Volume: 1
Pages: 38–39

Head Matter:
Remsen, Administratrix, against Isaacs.
On a non-enumerated motion for irregularity, merits cannot be entered ictq but on merits irregularity may be shown.
Mulligan moved to set aside a report of referees fat irregularity and on merits.
Woods, contra.
In King v. Hughes it was determined, that if a motion be made as non-enumerated for irre[*23] gularity, the Aground of merits must be abandoned, though on the merits the irregularity may be insisted on.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The rule is according to the decision cited. The application must be for irregularity only to bring it on as a non-enumerated motion. If merits are united, it becomes enumerated.
Motion denied.
S. P. Foden and Slater v. Sharp, & Johns. Rep. 183. .