Case Name: Mary A. OBERT, Respondent, v. Bradley DAHL, petitioner, Appellant
Court: Minnesota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Minnesota
Decision Date: 1999-01-28
Citations: 587 N.W.2d 844
Docket Number: No. C3-97-1023
Parties: Mary A. OBERT, Respondent, v. Bradley DAHL, petitioner, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: North Western Reporter 2d
Volume: 587
Pages: 844–845

Head Matter:
Mary A. OBERT, Respondent, v. Bradley DAHL, petitioner, Appellant.
No. C3-97-1023.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
Jan. 28, 1999.
Larry Neilson, Rooney & Neilson, Ltd., Arden Hills, for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION
PAGE, Justice.
The legal issue presented in this case is identical to the legal issue presented in In re Estate of Palmen, — N.W.2d -, - (Minn. Jan. 28, 1998). Based on our reasoning in Palmen the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.
Affirmed.