Case Name: Rolf R. VAUGHAN, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-10-17
Citations: 908 S.W.2d 168
Docket Number: No. 66984
Parties: Rolf R. VAUGHAN, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before SMITH, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and RHODES, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 908
Pages: 168–169

Head Matter:
Rolf R. VAUGHAN, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant/Respondent.
No. 66984.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Oct. 17, 1995.
C. Marshall Friedman, Kenneth E. Rudd, St. Louis, for appellant.
Gerard F. Hempstead, William A. Brasher, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before SMITH, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and RHODES, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff, Rolf Vaughan, brought suit under the Federal Employers' Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. § 51 et seq., to recover for injuries he sustained while employed by Defendant, Burlington Northern Railroad Company. Plaintiff now appeals from an adverse jury verdict. We affirm.
An extended opinion would serve no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Defendant's motion to dismiss the appeal for Plain- • tiffs noneompliance with Rule 84.04(c) is denied.