Case Name: Donald WADE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1986-04-09
Citations: 488 So. 2d 99
Docket Number: No. AY-285
Parties: Donald WADE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: BOOTH, C.J., SHIVERS, J., and TILLMAN PEARSON (Ret.), Associate Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 488
Pages: 99–99

Head Matter:
Donald WADE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. AY-285.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
April 9, 1986.
On Motion for Rehearing May 15, 1986.
Michael E. Allen, Public Defender, and Glenna Joyce Reeves, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Wallace E. Allbritton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Upon reconsideration pursuant to the mandate of the Supreme Court of Florida we apply the rule in Albritton v. State, 476 So.2d 158 (Fla.1985), and affirm the trial court's departure from the presumptive sentencing guidelines.
Although, in this case, both valid and invalid reasons for departure were given, the State has demonstrated beyond a reasonable doubt that the absence of the invalid reasons would not have affected the departure sentence. Accordingly, we affirm.
BOOTH, C.J., SHIVERS, J., and TILLMAN PEARSON (Ret.), Associate Judge, concur.