Case Name: John DOE, et al. v. MARYLAND STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, et al.
Court: Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jurisdiction: Maryland
Decision Date: 2012-06-13
Citations: 427 Md. 59
Docket Number: No. 131
Parties: John DOE, et al. v. MARYLAND STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Maryland Reports
Volume: 427
Pages: 59–60

Head Matter:
45 A.3d 748
John DOE, et al. v. MARYLAND STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, et al.
No. 131,
Sept. Term, 2011.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
June 13, 2012.
Joseph E. Sandler (Elizabeth F. Getman of Sandler, Reiff, Young & Lamb, P.C., Washington, DC), on brief, for Appellants.
Brett Marston (Michael Harris and Laura Cofer Taylor of Arnold & Porter, LLP, Washington, DC), for Appellants.
Matthew J. Fader, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Douglas F. Gansler, Atty. Gen. of Maryland, and Jeffrey L. Darsie, Asst. Atty. Gen., Baltimore, MD), on brief, for Appellees.
Paul J. Orfanedes (Chris Fedeli of Judicial Watch, Inc., Washington, DC), on brief, for Appellees.
Argued before BELL, C.J., HARRELL, BATTAGLIA, GREENE, ADKINS, BARBERA, LAWRENCE F. RODOWSKY, (Retired, Specially Assigned), JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
ORDER.
For reasons to be stated in an opinion later to be filed, it is this 13th day of June, 2012,
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the judgment of the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County be, and it is hereby, affirmed. Costs to be paid by the Appellants. Mandate to issue forthwith.