Case Name: Maurice Biederman, as Receiver in Supplementary Proceedings of Magnetic Paper Box Co., Inc., Respondent, v. Edson & Company, Inc., and Another, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1926-12-31
Citations: 128 Misc. 455
Docket Number: 
Parties: Maurice Biederman, as Receiver in Supplementary Proceedings of Magnetic Paper Box Co., Inc., Respondent, v. Edson & Company, Inc., and Another, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 128
Pages: 455–456

Head Matter:
Maurice Biederman, as Receiver in Supplementary Proceedings of Magnetic Paper Box Co., Inc., Respondent, v. Edson & Company, Inc., and Another, Appellants.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
December 31, 1926.
Robert I. Rogin, for the appellants.
Max J. LeBoyer, for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Although a levy appears to have been made under Iser's judgment on March 1, 1926, the evidence sufficiently indicates that the judgment creditor there and his attorney had notice at the time that title to the automobile had been reserved to defendant Edson & Company, Inc., under an unfiled conditional sale agreement with the judgment debtor. Consequently defendant Edson & Company, Inc., was entitled to possession of the automobile until payment of the judgment which it thereafter obtained in its action to foreclose its vendor's lien. (See Pers. Prop. Law, § 65, as added by Laws of 1922, chap. 642.)
The judgment must, therefore, be reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and the complaint dismissed.
All concur; present, Bijur, O'Malley and Levy, JJ.