Case Name: L. RUTHER, Appellant v. G6 HOSPITALITY LLC, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-11-17
Citations: 707 F. App'x 720
Docket Number: No. 17-7131
Parties: L. RUTHER, Appellant v. G6 HOSPITALITY LLC, Appellee
Judges: BEFORE: Kavanaugh and Millett, Circuit Judges, and Ginsburg, Senior Circuit Judge
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 707
Pages: 720–720

Head Matter:
L. RUTHER, Appellant v. G6 HOSPITALITY LLC, Appellee
No. 17-7131
September Term, 2017
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Filed On: November 17, 2017
L. Ruther, Pro Se
BEFORE: Kavanaugh and Millett, Circuit Judges, and Ginsburg, Senior Circuit Judge

Opinion:
JUDGMENT
Per Curiam
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's August 14, 2017 order be affirmed. The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing appellant's case without prejudice on the ground that the complaint did not meet the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a). See Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). Appellant's complaint did not contain a short and plain statement of the grounds for the court's jurisdiction or of the claim showing that he is entitled to relief. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a).
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.