Case Name: Angela PETTINELLI and Paul, Harney, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. U.S. BANK, N.A., and South Associates, P.C. Defendants-Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-09-12
Citations: 201 S.W.3d 76
Docket Number: No. ED 87376
Parties: Angela PETTINELLI and Paul, Harney, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. U.S. BANK, N.A., and South Associates, P.C. Defendants-Respondents.
Judges: Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 201
Pages: 76–76

Head Matter:
Angela PETTINELLI and Paul, Harney, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. U.S. BANK, N.A., and South Associates, P.C. Defendants-Respondents.
No. ED 87376.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Sept. 12, 2006.
Kenneth H. Gibert, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Nancy M. Wilson, South & Associates, P.C., Overland Park, KS, for respondent.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellants Angela Pettinelli and Paul Harney (collectively "Appellants") appeal from the decision of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, the Honorable David L. Dowd presiding, after the trial court dismissed two counts of Appellants' six-count petition, and further, denied Appellants' motion to amend one of the counts and add another count.
We have thoroughly reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, and no error of law appears. Therefore, an opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been given a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).