Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julio RAMIREZ, a.k.a. Cacho, Defendant-Appellant; United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julio Ramirez, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-01-29
Citations: 309 F. App'x 321
Docket Number: Nos. 08-11225, 08-11273
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julio RAMIREZ, a.k.a. Cacho, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julio Ramirez, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 309
Pages: 321–321

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julio RAMIREZ, a.k.a. Cacho, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julio Ramirez, Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 08-11225, 08-11273
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Jan. 29, 2009.
Stewart Glenn Abrams, Federal Public Defender, Kathleen M. Williams, Miami, FL, for Appellant.
Anne R. Schultz, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, for Appellee.
Before TJOFLAT, DUBINA and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Stewart Abrams, appointed counsel for Julio Ramirez in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Ramirez's convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.