Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dirk LADSON, a/k/a Dezo, a/k/a Eugene Martin, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-11-06
Citations: 487 F. App'x 79
Docket Number: No. 12-7249
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dirk LADSON, a/k/a Dezo, a/k/a Eugene Martin, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 487
Pages: 79–79

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dirk LADSON, a/k/a Dezo, a/k/a Eugene Martin, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-7249.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 2, 2012.
Decided: Nov. 6, 2012.
Dirk Ladson, Appellant Pro Se. Melissa Elaine O’Boyle, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Dirk Ladson appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence reduction based on Amendment 750 to the Sentencing Guidelines. Our review of the record demonstrates that Amendment 750 did not alter Ladson's Guidelines range. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. United States v. Ladson, No. 2:93-cr-00162-RAJ-10 (E.D.Va. filed July 12, 2012; entered July 13, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the deci-sional process.
AFFIRMED.