Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leon JACKSON, Jr., a/k/a Juice, a/k/a Juicy, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-11-29
Citations: 114 F. App'x 575
Docket Number: No. 04-7158
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leon JACKSON, Jr., a/k/a Juice, a/k/a Juicy, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before LUTTIG and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 114
Pages: 575–575

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leon JACKSON, Jr., a/k/a Juice, a/k/a Juicy, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 04-7158.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 18, 2004.
Decided: Nov. 29, 2004.
Leon Jackson, Jr., Appellant pro se.
Paul Joseph McNulty, United States Attorney, Irvin McCreary Allen, Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before LUTTIG and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Leon Jackson, Jr., appeals the district court's orders denying his motion for reconsideration and to vacate sentence, and for documents at Government expense. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Jackson, No. CR-95-6-A (E.D. Va. June 24, 2004 & July 7, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED