Case Name: Esther S. LAUER, Plaintiff/Appellant/Cross-Respondent, v. Norbert F. LAUER, Defendant/Respondent/Cross-Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1992-08-18
Citations: 833 S.W.2d 893
Docket Number: Nos. 60013, 60044
Parties: Esther S. LAUER, Plaintiff/Appellant/Cross-Respondent, v. Norbert F. LAUER, Defendant/Respondent/Cross-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 833
Pages: 893–893

Head Matter:
Esther S. LAUER, Plaintiff/Appellant/Cross-Respondent, v. Norbert F. LAUER, Defendant/Respondent/Cross-Appellant.
Nos. 60013, 60044.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Aug. 18, 1992.
William James O’Herin, Florissant, for appellant.
Mark Kruger, Randall B. Kahn, St. Louis, for respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Both Esther S. Lauer and Norbert F. Lauer, Jr., appeal from a decree which dissolved their marriage. The decree is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence and neither erroneously declares or applies the law. A written opinion would have no precedential value. The trial court's decree is, therefore, affirmed. Rule 84.16(b). We have provided the parties with a memorandum, solely for their own use, explaining the reasons for our decision.