Case Name: Kathleen Breslin WALKER and James Walker, Petitioners, v. Albert ROSE, D.P.M. and Curt D. Miller, M.D., Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1996-07-30
Citations: 679 A.2d 1264
Docket Number: 
Parties: Kathleen Breslin WALKER and James Walker, Petitioners, v. Albert ROSE, D.P.M. and Curt D. Miller, M.D., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 679
Pages: 1264–1264

Head Matter:
Kathleen Breslin WALKER and James Walker, Petitioners, v. Albert ROSE, D.P.M. and Curt D. Miller, M.D., Respondent.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
July 30, 1996.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
AND NOW, this 30th day of July, 1996, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, but LIMITED to the Mowing issue:
Whether the doctrine of informed consent is applicable to the intravenous administra- tion of a drug when the claim is that the harm in question was caused by the method and location of the injection?
It is further Ordered that Petitioners' Petition for Leave to File Supplement to their Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.