Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Pedro FUERTE-NAMBO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-05-26
Citations: 689 F. App'x 829
Docket Number: No. 16-50720 Summary Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Pedro FUERTE-NAMBO, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before JOLLY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 689
Pages: 829–830

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Pedro FUERTE-NAMBO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-50720 Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed May 26, 2017
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Jose Pedro Fuerte-Nambo, Pro Se
Before JOLLY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Fuerte-Nambo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Fuerte-Nambo has filed a response.
We have reviewed counsel's brief, relevant portions of the record, and Fuerte-Nambo's response. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow a fair evaluation of Fuerte-Nambo's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider it, without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cíe. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R, 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.