Case Name: Jesse G. YATES, III; Melissa Long Yates, Petitioners-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-11-21
Citations: 548 F. App'x 68
Docket Number: No. 13-1833
Parties: Jesse G. YATES, III; Melissa Long Yates, Petitioners-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 548
Pages: 68–68

Head Matter:
Jesse G. YATES, III; Melissa Long Yates, Petitioners-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 13-1833.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 19, 2013.
Decided: Nov. 21, 2013.
Jesse G. Yates, III, Melissa Long Yates, Appellants Pro Se. Carol Barthel, Randolph Lyons Hutter, Kathryn Keneally, Joan Iris Oppenheimer, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Before WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jesse G. Yates, III, and Melissa Long Yates appeal from the tax court's order upholding the Commissioner's determination of a deficiency and accuracy-related penalty with respect to their 2006 federal income tax liability. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. Yates v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, Tax Ct. No. 3685-11 (U.S. Tax Ct. Mar. 28, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.