Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio MANESES-FLORES, aka John Doe, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-04-16
Citations: 61 F. App'x 458
Docket Number: No. 02-50409; D.C. No. CR-01-00827-MMM
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio MANESES-FLORES, aka John Doe, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before RYMER, KLEINFELD and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 61
Pages: 458–458

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio MANESES-FLORES, aka John Doe, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-50409.
D.C. No. CR-01-00827-MMM.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 7, 2003.
Decided April 16, 2003.
Before RYMER, KLEINFELD and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Antonio Maneses-Flores appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 57-month sentence imposed for illegally reentering the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. ManesesFlores's attorney has filed a brief and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Maneses-Flores has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Our review of the Anders brief and our independent review of the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no issues requiring further review. Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
. All pending motions are denied.