Case Name: Knickerbocker Trust Company, as Trustee, Respondent, v. Oneonta, Cooperstown and Richfield Springs Railway Company and Others, Defendants. Henry W. Dean and Others, Respondents, and Daniel M. Lounsbury and Others, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1907-01
Citations: 117 A.D. 913
Docket Number: 
Parties: Knickerbocker Trust Company, as Trustee, Respondent, v. Oneonta, Cooperstown and Richfield Springs Railway Company and Others, Defendants. Henry W. Dean and Others, Respondents, and Daniel M. Lounsbury and Others, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 117
Pages: 913–913

Head Matter:
Knickerbocker Trust Company, as Trustee, Respondent, v. Oneonta, Cooperstown and Richfield Springs Railway Company and Others, Defendants. Henry W. Dean and Others, Respondents, and Daniel M. Lounsbury and Others, Appellants.

Opinion:
Motion for leave to go to the Court of Appeals granted and questions certified as follows: First. May a defendant without the service of an answer by himself require a determination of the ultimate rights of himself and a codefendant as between themselves on an answer demanding such determination served on him by such codefendant? Second.- Did the Special Term under the pleadings and proof herein properly render a judgment determining as between the defendants the ownership of the bonds?