Case Name: Herman M. BRADSHAW, Petitioner, v. FRANK M. MURPHY & ASSOCIATES, INC., Shelby Mutual Insurance Company and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1964-04-03
Citations: 162 So. 2d 519
Docket Number: No. 33145
Parties: Herman M. BRADSHAW, Petitioner, v. FRANK M. MURPHY & ASSOCIATES, INC., Shelby Mutual Insurance Company and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
Judges: DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 162
Pages: 519–519

Head Matter:
Herman M. BRADSHAW, Petitioner, v. FRANK M. MURPHY & ASSOCIATES, INC., Shelby Mutual Insurance Company and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
No. 33145.
Supreme Court of Florida.
April 3, 1964.
Harlan Tuck, of Bassett & Tuck, Mait-land, for petitioner.
John McQuigg, of Shackleford, Farrior, Stallings, Glos & Evans, Tampa, for Frank M. Murphy & Associates, Inc., and Shelby Mutual Ins. Co.
Paul E. Speh and Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, for Florida Industrial Commission.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date November 26, 1963.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.
DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, O'CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.