Case Name: LEWIS A. SERKIN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE # 1079, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TOWNSHIP OF OCEAN, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, AND MARTIN L. BAILEY, COLLECTOR OF TAXES, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS; HUXLEY HOLDING COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TOWNSHIP OF OCEAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT; J.R.H. ELECTRICAL-MECHANICAL CONTRACTING CORP., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TOWNSHIP OF OCEAN, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1985-04-08
Citations: 201 N.J. Super. 409
Docket Number: 
Parties: LEWIS A. SERKIN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE # 1079, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TOWNSHIP OF OCEAN, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, AND MARTIN L. BAILEY, COLLECTOR OF TAXES, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. HUXLEY HOLDING COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TOWNSHIP OF OCEAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. J.R.H. ELECTRICAL-MECHANICAL CONTRACTING CORP., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TOWNSHIP OF OCEAN, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 201
Pages: 409–409

Head Matter:
LEWIS A. SERKIN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE # 1079, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TOWNSHIP OF OCEAN, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, AND MARTIN L. BAILEY, COLLECTOR OF TAXES, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. HUXLEY HOLDING COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TOWNSHIP OF OCEAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. J.R.H. ELECTRICAL-MECHANICAL CONTRACTING CORP., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TOWNSHIP OF OCEAN, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued March 25, 1985—
Decided April 8, 1985.
Before Judges KING, DEIGHAN and BILDER.
Dennis M. Crawford argued the cause for appellants (Crawford & Hirsch, attorneys).
Paul L. Blenden argued the cause for respondent Lewis A. Serkin and all members of the class without attorneys.
Edward C. Stokes, III, argued the cause for respondent J.R.H. Electrical-Mechanical Contracting Corp. (Stokes & Throckmorton, attorneys).
Respondent Huxley Holding Company did not file a brief.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the judgment of the Law Division for the reasons stated in the written opinion of Judge Rimm of February 8, 1983. 201 N.J.Super. 392.