Case Name: Verizon New York Inc., Appellant, v. Case Construction Co., Inc., Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2009-06-16
Citations: 63 A.D.3d 521
Docket Number: 
Parties: Verizon New York Inc., Appellant, v Case Construction Co., Inc., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 63
Pages: 521–521

Head Matter:
Verizon New York Inc., Appellant, v Case Construction Co., Inc., Respondent.
[880 NYS2d 476]

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane Solomon, J.), entered January 23, 2009, which granted defendant's motion for an extension of time to answer and denied plaintiffs cross motion for a default judgment, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Defendant demonstrated a reasonable excuse for its delay in answering the complaint (see CPLR 3012 [d]; Finkelstein v East 65th St. Laundromat, 215 AD2d 178 [1995]). In addition, although it was not required to do so, defendant demonstrated the existence of meritorious defenses (see Terrones v Morera, 295 AD2d 254 [2002]). Concur—Saxe, J.E, Sweeny, Moskowitz, Acosta and Richter, JJ.