Case Name: Don C. NEWBY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. R. BROOKS, Officer, Individually and in his Official Capacity, Suffolk Police Department, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-02-02
Citations: 710 F. App'x 586
Docket Number: No. 17-7319
Parties: Don C. NEWBY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. R. BROOKS, Officer, Individually and in his Official Capacity, Suffolk Police Department, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 710
Pages: 586–587

Head Matter:
Don C. NEWBY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. R. BROOKS, Officer, Individually and in his Official Capacity, Suffolk Police Department, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 17-7319
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: January 30, 2018
Decided: February 2, 2018
Don Cornelius Newby, Appellant Pro Se. Emily Paige Bishop, Jeremy David Capps, HARMAN CLAYTOR CORRI-GAN & WELLMAN, P.C., Glen Alen, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Don C. Newby appeals the district court's order granting Defendant's motion to dismiss Newby's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action alleging the Defendant violated his "Fourth Amendment rights. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Newby v. Brooks, No. 3:16-cv-00944-JAG, 2017 WL 4323583 (E.D. Va. Sept. 28, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED