Case Name: Victor MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2013-11-27
Citations: 130 So. 3d 713
Docket Number: No. 2D12-6339
Parties: Victor MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SILBERMAN and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 130
Pages: 713–713

Head Matter:
Victor MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D12-6339.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Nov. 27, 2013.
Victor Miller, pro se.

Opinion:
WALLACE, Judge.
We affirm the postconviction court's denial of Victor Miller's motion filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) because Mr. Miller did not demonstrate where in the record it can be shown that he is entitled to relief. See Johnson v. State, 60 So.3d 1045, 1051 n. 2 (Fla. 2011). However, our affirmance is without prejudice for Mr. Miller to file a facially sufficient motion.
Although we affirm the denial of Mr. Miller's motion, we note that constructive possession of a firearm cannot support the imposition of a minimum mandatory sentence enhancement under sections 775.087(1)-(2), Florida Statutes (2000). See Irons v. State, 851 So.2d 798, 798 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).
Affirmed without prejudice.
SILBERMAN and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.