Case Name: Virgil and Vivian BOSWELL, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-05-23
Citations: 898 S.W.2d 155
Docket Number: No. 65662
Parties: Virgil and Vivian BOSWELL, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANE, P.J., and CRANDALL and DOWD, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 898
Pages: 155–155

Head Matter:
Virgil and Vivian BOSWELL, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant/Respondent.
No. 65662.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
May 23, 1995.
Tracy Anne Gilroy, Draheim & Pronschke, St. Louis, for appellants.
Paul E. Littleton, Daniel M. Buescher, Brasher Law Firm, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before CRANE, P.J., and CRANDALL and DOWD, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiffs, Virgil Boswell and Vivian Boswell, appeal from the judgment of the trial court, entered pursuant to a jury verdict, in favor of defendant, Burlington Northern Railroad Company, in an action to recover damages for the partial flooding of their real estate. Plaintiffs' brought the action under § 389.660, RSMo (1994) which required railroads to provide proper drainage through railroad rights-of-ways.
No error of law appears. A written opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Defendant's motion to dismiss the appeal for plaintiffs' failure to comply with Rule 84.04(h) is denied.