Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Rico Burgess, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2017-12-13
Citations: 156 A.D.3d 714
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rico Burgess, Appellant.
Judges: Dillon, J.P., Sgroi, Maltese, Barros and Christopher, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 156
Pages: 714–715

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rico Burgess, Appellant.
[64 NYS3d 924]

Opinion:
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gub-bay, J.), rendered March 7, 2016, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the defendant.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).
Dillon, J.P., Sgroi, Maltese, Barros and Christopher, JJ., concur.