Case Name: The Mount Vernon Trust Company, Respondent, v. Hugh McAtamney, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1928-05
Citations: 224 A.D. 662
Docket Number: 
Parties: The Mount Vernon Trust Company, Respondent, v. Hugh McAtamney, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 224
Pages: 662–663

Head Matter:
The Mount Vernon Trust Company, Respondent, v. Hugh McAtamney, Appellant.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed, with costs. The appellant's own testimony (fols. 131-134, 139) sufficiently established that his relation to the original notes was that of a primary obligor, to whom notice of protest of the renewal note immediately preceding the note in suit was not necessary. (Witherow v. Slayback, 158 N. Y. 649.) His defense, therefore, of a conditional delivery was unavailing. Rich, Young, Kapper and Scudder, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., concurs in result.