Case Name: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. LUMAS A. RICE, DEFENDANT, AND INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1977-02-25
Citations: 148 N.J. Super. 145
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. LUMAS A. RICE, DEFENDANT, AND INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 148
Pages: 145–145

Head Matter:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. LUMAS A. RICE, DEFENDANT, AND INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued February 15, 1977
Decided February 25, 1977.
Before Judges Lynch, Milmbd and Antell.
Mr. Vincent N. Maori argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Gold and Maori, attorneys; Mr. Jack Gold on the brief).
Mr. Frank A. Tunnero argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Francis Patrick McQuade, Essex County Counsel, attorney; Mr. Richard M. Cignarella, First Assistant County Counsel, on the statement in lieu of brief).

Opinion:
Pee Cueiam.
The order under review is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Scalera in his opinion of November 24, 1975, 137 N. J. Super. 593 (Cty. Ct. 1975).