Case Name: In re Edward Alphonse HILL, a/k/a Puddin, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-03-21
Citations: 641 F. App'x 266
Docket Number: No. 15-2282
Parties: In re Edward Alphonse HILL, a/k/a Puddin, Petitioner.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER/ and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 641
Pages: 266–267

Head Matter:
In re Edward Alphonse HILL, a/k/a Puddin, Petitioner.
No. 15-2282.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 17, 2016.
Decided: March 21, 2016.
Edward Alphonse Hill, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER/ and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Edward Alphonse Hill petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion for transcripts, and he has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Hill seeks an order from this court direct ing the district court to act on his motion for transcripts. Our review of the district court's docket reveals that the district court has since denied Hill's motion. Accordingly, although we grant Hill's application to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.