Case Name: In the Interest of P.A.P., J.P. and J.A.P., Each a Child. Jeanine Pyritz LUKACH, Appellant, v. James Andrew PYRITZ, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1987-08-27
Citations: 512 So. 2d 1016
Docket Number: Nos. BO-174, BM-280
Parties: In the Interest of P.A.P., J.P. and J.A.P., Each a Child. Jeanine Pyritz LUKACH, Appellant, v. James Andrew PYRITZ, Appellee.
Judges: ERVIN, NIMMONS and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 512
Pages: 1016–1016

Head Matter:
In the Interest of P.A.P., J.P. and J.A.P., Each a Child. Jeanine Pyritz LUKACH, Appellant, v. James Andrew PYRITZ, Appellee.
Nos. BO-174, BM-280.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Aug. 27, 1987.
Michael J. Pugh of Mann, Lang, Staples & Pugh, Pensacola, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Joseph Lewis, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee/Dept. of Health and Rehabilitative Services.
Charles J. Kahn and Richard E. Scher-ling of Levin, Warfield, Middlebrooks, Ma-bie, Thomas, Mayes & Mitchell, Pensacola, for appellee/Pyritz.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the dependency order appealed in Case No. BO-174. Such order superseded the earlier custody modification order which is the subject of the appeal in Case No. BM-280. Affirmance of the dependency order renders moot the appeal in BM-280. Accordingly, the appeal in the latter case is hereby dismissed.
ERVIN, NIMMONS and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.