Case Name: Ora Rafaelova et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. City of New York et al., Respondents, and Domingo Corsino et al., Respondents-Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2006-01-17
Citations: 25 A.D.3d 442
Docket Number: 
Parties: Ora Rafaelova et al., Appellants-Respondents, v City of New York et al., Respondents, and Domingo Corsino et al., Respondents-Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 25
Pages: 442–442

Head Matter:
Ora Rafaelova et al., Appellants-Respondents, v City of New York et al., Respondents, and Domingo Corsino et al., Respondents-Appellants.
[810 NYS2d 123]

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Salvatore R. Martoche, J.), entered April 16, 2004, which denied plaintiffs' motion to amend the pleadings to assert an exemption from the CPLR article 16 limitation on liability for damages, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The motion was properly denied since plaintiff did not plead an exception to CPLR 1601, which operates to limit defendants' liability to their respective equitable shares of fault, and never sought leave to amend her pleadings to include such exception until after the verdict was rendered and the jury was discharged (see Cole v Mandell Food Stores, 93 NY2d 34, 39-40 [1999]; Morales v County of Nassau, 94 NY2d 218, 224 [1999]). The proposed amendment would not have availed plaintiffs in any event, since there is no support for their contention that Fire Department ambulances are among the motor vehicles coming within the exception set forth in CPLR 1602 (6) (see Vehicle and Traffic Law § 311 [2]).
We have considered appellants' remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Nardelli and McGuire, JJ.