Case Name: Richard Lee OPRENCHAK, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant v. AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, and its affiliates and subsidiaries, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-09-05
Citations: 575 F. App'x 700
Docket Number: No. 13-3694
Parties: Richard Lee OPRENCHAK, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant v. AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, and its affiliates and subsidiaries, Defendant-Ap-pellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 575
Pages: 700–701

Head Matter:
Richard Lee OPRENCHAK, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant v. AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, and its affiliates and subsidiaries, Defendant-Ap-pellee.
No. 13-3694.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 5, 2014.
Filed: Sept. 24, 2014.
Richard Lee Oprenchak, Jr., Plymouth, MN, pro se.
Timothy R. Franzen, David Paul Jen-drzejek, Taylor Tarvestad-Sztainer, Moss & Barnett, Minneapolis, MN, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before MURPHY, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Richard Lee Oprenchak, Jr., appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment in his diversity action against his former employer, American Family Mutual Insurance Company, and its affiliates and subsidiaries (American Family). Having conducted de novo review of the record and carefully considered Oprenchak's arguments for reversal, we agree with the district court that Oprenchak did not adequately counter American Family's evidence showing that there were no genuine issues of material fact on Oprenchak's state law claims. See Young v. Builders Steel Co., 754 F.3d 573, 577 (8th Cir.2014). The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.
. We decline to consider the matters Oprenc-hak raises for the first time on appeal. See Stone v. Harry, 364 F.3d 912, 914-15 (8th Cir.2004).