Case Name: ZOLTEK CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Cross Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-09-21
Citations: 464 F.3d 1335
Docket Number: Nos. 04-5100, 04-5102
Parties: ZOLTEK CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Cross Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, MAYER, Circuit Judges, PLAGER, Senior Circuit Judge, LOURIE, RADER, SCHALL, BRYSON, GAJARSA, LINN, DYK, and PROST, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Claims Reporter
Volume: 72
Pages: 1335–1339

Head Matter:
ZOLTEK CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Cross Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 04-5100, 04-5102.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Sept. 21, 2006.
Dean A. Moneo, Wood, Phillips, Katz, Clark & Mortimer, of Chicago, Illinois, filed a petition for rehearing en banc for plaintiff-cross appellant. With him on the petition was John S. Mortimer. Of counsel on the petition were David W. Long and Pamela S. Kane, Howrey LLP, of Washington, DC.
Anne Murphy, Attorney, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, filed a response to the petition for defendant-appellant. With her on the response were Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, and Scott R. McIntosh, Attorney.
Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, MAYER, Circuit Judges, PLAGER, Senior Circuit Judge, LOURIE, RADER, SCHALL, BRYSON, GAJARSA, LINN, DYK, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
A petition for rehearing en banc was filed by the Cross-Appellant, and a response thereto was invited by the court and filed by the Appellant. The matter was referred first as petition for panel rehearing to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition for rehearing en banc and response were referred to the circuit judges who were authorized to request a poll whether to rehear the appeal en banc . A poll was requested, taken, and failed.
Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) The petition for rehearing is deified.
(2) The petition for rehearing en banc is denied.
(8) The mandate of the court will issue on September 28, 2006.
NEWMAN, Circuit Judge, dissents in a separate opinion.
DYK, Circuit Judge, with whom GAJARSA, Circuit Judge, joins, concurs in the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc in a separate opinion.
. Circuit Judge Moore assumed office on September 8, 2006, after the voting deadline had expired in this matter.