Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Richard Charles PARKER, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1972-03-06
Citations: 454 F.2d 1177
Docket Number: No. 71-2727
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Richard Charles PARKER, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 454
Pages: 1177–1177

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Richard Charles PARKER, Appellant.
No. 71-2727.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
March 6, 1972.
James M. McCabe (argued), James P. Hagerstrom, of Federal Defenders of San Diego, San Diego, Cal., for appellant.
Thomas M. Coffin, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Harry D. Steward, U. S. Atty., Stephen G. Nelson, Asst. U. S. Atty. & Chief, Criminal Division, John F. Coon-ey, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before CHAMBERS and CHOY, Circuit Judges, and LYDICK, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of conviction in this selective service case is reversed.
Parker was charged with failure to report in San Diego (for transportation to the induction center in Los Angeles) in the Southern District of California. The proof is adequate that he failed to report at the Los Angeles center in the Central District. There is a weak inference on the record here that Parker failed to report in San Diego, but we regard it as not strong enough to sustain a conviction.