Case Name: Thomas M. Gerrity et al., Appellants, v. Abdul-Malik Muthana, Defendant, and Leprechaun Lines, Inc., et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2006-09-19
Citations: 7 N.Y.3d 834
Docket Number: 
Parties: Thomas M. Gerrity et al., Appellants, v Abdul-Malik Muthana, Defendant, and Leprechaun Lines, Inc., et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 7
Pages: 834–836

Head Matter:
[857 NE2d 527, 824 NYS2d 206]
Thomas M. Gerrity et al., Appellants, v Abdul-Malik Muthana, Defendant, and Leprechaun Lines, Inc., et al., Respondents.
Decided September 19, 2006
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Reden & O’Donnell, Buffalo (Joseph E. O’Donnell of counsel), for appellants.
Walsh, Roberts & Grace, Buffalo (Thomas E. Roberts of counsel), for Leprechaun Lines, Inc., respondent.
Alisa A. Lukasiewicz, Corporation Counsel, Buffalo (Lisa M. Yaeger of counsel), for City of Buffalo, respondent.
Lippman O’Connor, Buffalo {Robert M. Lippman of counsel), for County of Erie, respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Even assuming that the location of the bus owned by defendant Leprechaun Lines, Inc. in the traffic lane at the time of the accident resulted, in some respect, from negligence on the part of Leprechaun, the City of Buffalo or the County of Erie/ Erie Community College as plaintiffs allege, these defendants were nonetheless entitled to summary judgment because they established, as a matter of law, that the alleged negligence was not a proximate cause of plaintiffs injuries (see Sheehan v City of New York, 40 NY2d 496, 503 [1976]).
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and R.S. Smith concur.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.