Case Name: McDONALD'S CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dat DO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-10-11
Citations: 20 F. App'x 194
Docket Number: No. 01-1766
Parties: McDONALD’S CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dat DO, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 20
Pages: 194–194

Head Matter:
McDONALD’S CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dat DO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 01-1766.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 4, 2001.
Decided Oct. 11, 2001.
Dat Do, pro se.
David Harold Dickieson, Buchanan In-gersoll, P.C., Washington, DC, for appel-lee.
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Dat Do appeals from the district court's order granting McDonald's motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McDonald's Corp. v. Do, No. CA-00-1592-A (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 30, 2001; entered May 2, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.