Case Name: A. O. Steenburg, A. C. Steenburg and H. M. Tillis, Appellants, vs. Alice A. Richbourg and D. J. Richbourg, her Husband, Appellees
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1903-01
Citations: 45 Fla. 589
Docket Number: 
Parties: A. O. Steenburg, A. C. Steenburg and H. M. Tillis, Appellants, vs. Alice A. Richbourg and D. J. Richbourg, her Husband, Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 45
Pages: 589–590

Head Matter:
A. O. Steenburg, A. C. Steenburg and H. M. Tillis, Appellants, vs. Alice A. Richbourg and D. J. Richbourg, her Husband, Appellees.
An appeal from two or more interlocutory decrees, some of which, were rendered more than six months prior to the entry of the appeal, will entitle the party appellant* to have the Supreme Court consider the propriety of those decrees only that were rendered within six months prior to such entry of appeal.
Tins case was decided by Division B.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Alachua county.
The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court. . .
B. A. Thrasher, for Appellants;
TE. W. Hampton, for Appellees.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This cause came on to be finally heard, and was duly considered upon the abstracts of the record and briefs of counsel for the respective parties, and the court being advised of its opinion, that there is no error, it was, therefore, considered by the court that the interlocutory decrees of the court below from which this appeal was taken be and the same are affirmed, except the interlocutory decree dated August 17th, 1897, refusing motion to dissolve injunction, which is not considered, because the appeal therefrom was entered more than, six months after its rendition. Ray v. Frank; Mattair v. Furchgott, decided by this court at thé June term, 1902.
Appellants will be taxed with the costs of this appeal.