Case Name: James W. MORGAN, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-06-25
Citations: 13 F. App'x 547
Docket Number: No. 00-56430; D.C. No. CV-00-00103-IEG-AJB
Parties: James W. MORGAN, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before O’SCANNLAIN, SILVERMAN, and RONALD M. GOULD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 13
Pages: 547–548

Head Matter:
James W. MORGAN, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 00-56430.
D.C. No. CV-00-00103-IEG-AJB.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 11, 2001.
Decided June 25, 2001.
Before O’SCANNLAIN, SILVERMAN, and RONALD M. GOULD, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
James Morgan appeals pro se the judgment dismissing his action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for failure to state a claim, Romano v. Bible, 169 F.3d 1182, 1185 (9th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 816, 120 S.Ct. 55, 145 L.Ed.2d 48 (1999), and we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's order granting defendant's motion to dismiss filed July 25, 2000.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.