Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leysmilan RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-03-06
Citations: 714 F. App'x 982
Docket Number: No. 17-12290 Non-Argument Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leysmilan RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILLIAM PRYOR, ANDERSON, and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 714
Pages: 982–982

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leysmilan RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 17-12290 Non-Argument Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
(March 6, 2018)
Laura Thomas Rivero, Lisa Tobin Ru-bio, Emily M. Smachetti, U.S. Attorney Service—Southern District of Florida, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Joseph A. Chambrot, Chambrot Law Office, Miami, FL, for Defendant-Appellant
Before WILLIAM PRYOR, ANDERSON, and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Leysmilan Rodriguez appeals his 78-month sentence, imposed at the low end of the advisory guideline range, after pleading guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit health' care and wire fraud. The doctrine of invited error precludes Rodriguez from arguing that he was not an organizer or leader of this conspiracy: he agreed to recommend that the district court conclude he was an organizer or leader of the criminal activity in question. For background, see United States v. Love, 449 F.3d 1154 (11th Cir. 2006).
AFFIRMED.