Case Name: Dan H. Arnold, Appellant, v. Potter, Hamilton & Butler, Inc., Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1929-06
Citations: 226 A.D. 868
Docket Number: 
Parties: Dan H. Arnold, Appellant, v. Potter, Hamilton & Butler, Inc., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 226
Pages: 868–868

Head Matter:
Dan H. Arnold, Appellant, v. Potter, Hamilton & Butler, Inc., Respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed. Assuming that the question whether there was a loan to the defendant corporation, rather than an investment by the plaintiff, should have been submitted to the jury, the plaintiff failed to show that the loan was authorized by the defendant. Present — Dowling, P. J., Merrell, Martin, O'Malley and Proskauer, JJ.