Case Name: D. A. D., INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. CALI, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1963-01-22
Citations: 148 So. 2d 731
Docket Number: No. 62-451
Parties: D. A. D., INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. CALI, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.
Judges: Before PEARSON, TILLMAN, C. J., and HORTON and HENDRY, TT.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 148
Pages: 731–732

Head Matter:
D. A. D., INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. CALI, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.
No. 62-451.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
Jan. 22, 1963.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 8, 1963.
E. O. Denison, Fort Pierce, for appellant.
W. F. Esslinger and Nestor Morales, Miami, for appellee.
Before PEARSON, TILLMAN, C. J., and HORTON and HENDRY, TT.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The question presented by this appeal is whether the chancellor erred when he found that the forfeiture of the security deposit under the hotel lease involved was a penalty rather than liquidated damages. The decree is affirmed upon authority of Stenor, Inc. v. Lester, Fla.1951, 58 So.2d 673; Kanter v. Safran, Fla.1953, 68 So.2d 553; Pappas v. Deringer, Fla.App.1962, 145 So.2d 770.
Affirmed.