Case Name: FREDERICK S. DALRYMPLE, COLLECTOR, &c., PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE WARREN MANUFACTURING COMPANY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1895-03
Citations: 57 N.J.L. 708
Docket Number: 
Parties: FREDERICK S. DALRYMPLE, COLLECTOR, &c., PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE WARREN MANUFACTURING COMPANY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 57
Pages: 708–709

Head Matter:
FREDERICK S. DALRYMPLE, COLLECTOR, &c., PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE WARREN MANUFACTURING COMPANY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
On error to the Supreme Court. For opinion of that court, see 27 Vroom 449.
For the plaintiff in error, Richard S. Kuhl and William M. Lanning.
For the defendant in error, William S. Gummere.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment below is affirmed, for the reasons given by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Lippincott, Magie, Van Syckel, Brown, Krueger, Sims. 9.
For reversal — Reed. .1.