Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Michael J. Murello, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1976-06-03
Citations: 39 N.Y.2d 879
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael J. Murello, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 39
Pages: 879–880

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael J. Murello, Appellant.
Argued May 7, 1976;
decided June 3, 1976
Richard T. Farrell for appellant.
Eugene Gold, District Attorney (James A. Steinberg of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
Order affirmed (see, generally, People v Selikoff, 35 NY2d 227, especially at p 236). The promise purportedly made was conditional and it was a matter of fact finding whether defendant breached the condition. On this record, therefore, the issue is beyond review in this court.
Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke.