Case Name: FITZGERALD BROS. BREWING CO., Appellant, v. FINNERTY, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1900-02-23
Citations: 62 N.Y.S. 1137
Docket Number: 
Parties: FITZGERALD BROS. BREWING CO., Appellant, v. FINNERTY, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 62
Pages: 1137–1137

Head Matter:
FITZGERALD BROS. BREWING CO., Appellant, v. FINNERTY, Respondent.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
February 23, 1900.)
Action bjr the Fitzgerald Bros. Brewing Company against Daniel Finnerty. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals. Reversed. Lyman W. Redington, for appellant. John Callahan, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This was an action to recover a deficiency arising under the foreclosure of a chattel mortgage. The proof clearly established the execution and delivery of the mortgage, default, sale under the mortgage, and resulting deficiency. At the close of the entire case, • defendant moved for judgment on the ground there was no proof of a sale under the mortgage. There was nothing in the case, however, to justify this contention. That a sale took place is clearly established by uncontradicted evidence. The judgment rendered in favor of the defendant is without proof, to support it, and must be reversed. Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.