Case Name: PAUL N. HOWARD COMPANY, INA of Texas, et al., Petitioner, v. CAMP, DRESSER & McKEE, INC., et al., Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2006-10-06
Citations: 938 So. 2d 638
Docket Number: No. 5D06-2356
Parties: PAUL N. HOWARD COMPANY, INA of Texas, et al., Petitioner, v. CAMP, DRESSER & McKEE, INC., et al., Respondent.
Judges: PLEUS, C.J., PALMER and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 938
Pages: 638–639

Head Matter:
PAUL N. HOWARD COMPANY, INA of Texas, et al., Petitioner, v. CAMP, DRESSER & McKEE, INC., et al., Respondent.
No. 5D06-2356.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Oct. 6, 2006.
Michael M. Bell and Mary Grace Dyle-ski, Bell, Leeper & Roper, P.A., Orlando, for Petitioners.
James D. Kisio of Irby G. Pugh, P.A., Orlando, and William H. Selde of Sodoro, Daly & Sodoro, P.C., Omaha, for Respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We dismiss the petition for writ of cer-tiorari filed by Paul N. Howard Company, INA of Texas, Pacific Employers Insurance Company, INA Insurance Company of Illinois and Atlantic Employers Insurance Company. A non-final order denying a motion for summary judgment is generally not reviewable by interlocutory appeal or common law certiorari. Barber v. Wonderland Greyhound Park, 656 So.2d 961, 961-62 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (citing Vaneo Constr., Inc. v. Nucor Corp., 378 So.2d 116 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)); see also Baptist Hosp. of Miami, Inc. v. Demario, 682 So.2d 1106 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).
PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIO-RARI DISMISSED.
PLEUS, C.J., PALMER and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.