Case Name: The State of Ohio, ex rel., Sibarco Corp. et al., appellees v. Hicks, Building Inspector, et al., appellants
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1964-12-02
Citations: 29 Ohio L.R. 35
Docket Number: 38545
Parties: The State of Ohio, ex rel., Sibarco Corp. et al., appellees v. Hicks, Building Inspector, et al., appellants.
Judges: Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Griffith and Herbert, JJ., concur.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Reporter; a weekly journal published in the interest of the legal profession in the state of Ohio
Volume: 29
Pages: 35–36

Head Matter:
Announced Wednesday, December 2.
38545.
The State of Ohio, ex rel., Sibarco Corp. et al., appellees v. Hicks, Building Inspector, et al., appellants.

Opinion:
Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Mahoning County. Gibson, Judge.
By reason of Section 2731.05, Revised Code, enacted pursuant to Section 4, Article IV, Ohio Constitution, it is error for the Common Pleas Court to issue a .writ of mandamus in those cases where there is a plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law.
Judgment reversed.
Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O'Neill, Griffith and Herbert, JJ., concur.