Case Name: STATE of Florida BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF the INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND, Appellant, and Thomas A. Morrill, Joinder in Appeal, v. Edward BALL, Individually, and as administrator of the Edward Ball Wildlife Foundation, and Wakulla Silver Springs Company, a Florida corporation, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1974-05-30
Citations: 300 So. 2d 741
Docket Number: No. U-29
Parties: STATE of Florida BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF the INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND, Appellant, and Thomas A. Morrill, Joinder in Appeal, v. Edward BALL, Individually, and as administrator of the Edward Ball Wildlife Foundation, and Wakulla Silver Springs Company, a Florida corporation, Appellees.
Judges: SPECTOR, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and BOYER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 300
Pages: 741–741

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF the INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND, Appellant, and Thomas A. Morrill, Joinder in Appeal, v. Edward BALL, Individually, and as administrator of the Edward Ball Wildlife Foundation, and Wakulla Silver Springs Company, a Florida corporation, Appellees.
No. U-29.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
May 30, 1974.
Rehearing Denied Oct. 11, 1974.
Kenneth G. Oertel and Ross A. McVoy, Miami, for appellant..
Thomas A. Morrill, in pro. per., for join-der in appeal.
W. J. Oven, Jr., Tallahassee, for appel-lees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant seeks review of an adverse final judgment rendered in favor of appel-lee. The principal question preserved on appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment..
In our review of the record we have given due consideration to the applicable appellate principle that a judgment of the trial court reaches the appellate court clothed with a presumption of correctness. Our review of the record reveals that although the testimony is conflicting, there is sufficient evidence to support the findings made and conclusions reached by the trial court. It is not the province of this court to theorize and conjecture as to what evidence could have been adduced, nor are we permitted to invade the province of the trier of facts and determine which evidence we believe. The findings of the trial court, when there is credible evidence in the record to support such findings, will not be disturbed on appeal. The rulings of the trial court as to the other issues raised by appellant likewise have a sufficient basis in the record. The judgment appealed is accordingly.
Affirmed.
SPECTOR, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and BOYER, JJ., concur.
. Stoller v. Jaffe, 125 So.2d 310 (Fla.App.1961); Old Equity Life Insurance Company v. Levenson, 177 So.2d 50 (Fla.App.1965).