Case Name: Charles R. MAJOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GREENVILLE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE; Cathy Phillips, Anderson County Clerk of Court; Stephen M. Pruitt, sued in his professional and his individual capacity; Carolina Emergency Physicians; Stephen Burkholtz, Doctor, sued in his professional and in his individual capacity; Benjamin Crumpler, Doctor, sued in his professional and his individual capacity, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-03-30
Citations: 174 F. App'x 151
Docket Number: No. 06-1104
Parties: Charles R. MAJOR, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. GREENVILLE COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE; Cathy Phillips, Anderson County Clerk of Court; Stephen M. Pruitt, sued in his professional and his individual capacity; Carolina Emergency Physicians; Stephen Burkholtz, Doctor, sued in his professional and in his individual capacity; Benjamin Crumpler, Doctor, sued in his professional and his individual capacity, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 174
Pages: 151–152

Head Matter:
Charles R. MAJOR, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. GREENVILLE COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE; Cathy Phillips, Anderson County Clerk of Court; Stephen M. Pruitt, sued in his professional and his individual capacity; Carolina Emergency Physicians; Stephen Burkholtz, Doctor, sued in his professional and in his individual capacity; Benjamin Crumpler, Doctor, sued in his professional and his individual capacity, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 06-1104.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 23, 2006.
Decided: March 30, 2006.
Charles R. Major, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Charles R. Major appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Major v. Greenville County Sheriff's Office, No. 6:05-cv-01993-RBH (D.S.C. Dec. 9 & 12, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED