Case Name: Curtis BLANK, Jean-Claude Martin and Michael Challamel, Appellants, v. FORSYTHE, HUMPHREY & ASSOCIATES, AIA, a Florida corporation, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-09-28
Citations: 567 So. 2d 57
Docket Number: No. 89-02674
Parties: Curtis BLANK, Jean-Claude Martin and Michael Challamel, Appellants, v. FORSYTHE, HUMPHREY & ASSOCIATES, AIA, a Florida corporation, Appellee.
Judges: SCHEB, A.C.J., and DANAHY and LEHAN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 567
Pages: 57–57

Head Matter:
Curtis BLANK, Jean-Claude Martin and Michael Challamel, Appellants, v. FORSYTHE, HUMPHREY & ASSOCIATES, AIA, a Florida corporation, Appellee.
No. 89-02674.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Sept. 28, 1990.
Vincent Murphy of Murphy Law Firm, Naples, for appellants.
John P. Cardillo of Monaco, Cardillo & Keith, P.A., Naples, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the summary judgment entered in favor of appellee, a defendant in this mortgage foreclosure suit who, as cross-claimant, filed its claim against other appellees to foreclose a mechanic's lien. We agree that section 713.22(1), Florida Statutes (1987), did not preclude the cross-claim. That section provides that a mechanic's lien does not continue for more than one year after the claim of lien has been recorded "unless within that time an action to enforce the lien is commenced in a court of .competent jurisdiction." While the foreclosure action in the cross-claim was filed more than one year after the claim of lien was recorded, appellee was shown to have filed in a court of competent jurisdiction a prior action to foreclose that lien before the expiration of that one year period. It may be assumed that the two actions will be consolidated.
SCHEB, A.C.J., and DANAHY and LEHAN, JJ., concur.