Case Name: BAMBERGER, Appellant v. MANHATTAN RY. CO., Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1896-04-17
Citations: 38 N.Y.S. 1141
Docket Number: 
Parties: BAMBERGER, Appellant v. MANHATTAN RY. CO., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 38
Pages: 1141–1141

Head Matter:
BAMBERGER, Appellant v. MANHATTAN RY. CO., Respondent.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
April 17, 1896.)
Action by Max Bamberger against the Manhattan Railway Company. W. W. Badger, for appellant. Davies, Short & Townsend, for respondent

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The facts in this case are not in all respects the same as they were in the Otten Case, lately decided by this court (37 N. Y. Supp. 982); but the principle upon which the reversal in the latter case proceeded is applicable to these facts. The variations are not sufficiently important to affect the result. The judgment should therefore be reversed, and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.