Case Name: Cearful SPEIGHT, Jr. v. John NASH, Warden
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-12-06
Citations: 208 F. App'x 105
Docket Number: No. 06-2841
Parties: Cearful SPEIGHT, Jr. v. John NASH, Warden.
Judges: Before: RENDELL, SMITH and COWEN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 208
Pages: 105–106

Head Matter:
This case was not selected for publication in the Federal Reporter NOT PRECEDENTIAL
Cearful SPEIGHT, Jr. v. John NASH, Warden.
No. 06-2841.
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Submitted For Possible Summary Action Under Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6 Oct. 26, 2006.
Filed: Dec. 6, 2006.
Cearful Speight #24171-083, Jr., Fort Dix, NJ, pro se.
Before: RENDELL, SMITH and COWEN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
PER CURIAM.
Cearful Speight, Jr. appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, dismissing the petition he filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The District Court noted that Speight had previously filed a § 2241 petition raising the same claims, which it had dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, and that this Court affirmed on appeal. See Speight v. Nash, D. N.J. Civ. No. 05- 319(FLW); Speight v. Nash, 132 Fed. Appx. 423 (3d Cir.2005). As this Court has previously affirmed the District Court's holding that it lacked jurisdiction to consider Speight's arguments, it follows that the District Court similarly lacked jurisdiction to consider the identical arguments brought in the instant petition. We will therefore summarily affirm the District Court's order.