Case Name: KENTUCKY RESTAURANT CONCEPTS INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF LOUISVILLE, et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-10-06
Citations: 110 F. App'x 678
Docket Number: No. 02-5885, 02-5888
Parties: KENTUCKY RESTAURANT CONCEPTS INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF LOUISVILLE, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 110
Pages: 678–678

Head Matter:
KENTUCKY RESTAURANT CONCEPTS INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF LOUISVILLE, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 02-5885, 02-5888.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Oct. 6, 2004.
Robert D. McClure, Kruger, Schwartz & Morreau, E. Brian Davis, Law Office of E. Brian Davis, Louisville, KY, Allan S. Rubin, Law Office of Allan S. Rubin, Southfield, MI, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
Bradley J. Shafer, Shafer & Associates, Lansing, MI, for Intervenor.
Winston E. King, Asst. Law Director, City of Louisville, Louisville, KY, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before BATCHELDER and SUTTON, Circuit Judges; and BELL, District Judge.
The Honorable Robert Holmes Bell, Chief United States District Judge for the Western District of Michigan, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge.
At oral argument, counsel for Appellants and Appellees conceded that the only issue properly before this court is the question of damages-a question not overtly considered by the district court's June 12, 2002 order. We agree. Accordingly, we deny the Appellees' Motion to Dismiss and we REMAND this case for consideration of damages in light of the district court's prior order in favor of Appellants and such other factors as the district court deems relevant.