Case Name: UNITED STATES of AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ernest MARSHALL, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1992-11-03
Citations: 976 F.2d 658
Docket Number: No. 91-8141
Parties: UNITED STATES of AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ernest MARSHALL, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY and COX, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 976
Pages: 658–659

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ernest MARSHALL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 91-8141.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Nov. 3, 1992.
Bruce Maloy, Maloy & Jenkins, Atlanta, Ga., for defendant-appellant.
James T. Martin, Asst. U.S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for. plaintiff-appellee.
Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY and COX, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
We find it proper to include the defendant when counting the individuals involved in the criminal activity. United States v. Schweihs, 971 F.2d 1302 (7th Cir.1992); United States v. Harry, 960 F.2d 51, 53 (8th Cir.1992); United States v. Fells, 920 F.2d 1179, 1182 (4th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 2831, 115 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1991); United States v. Reid, 911 F.2d 1456, 1464 (10th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S.- 111 S.Ct. 990, 112 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1991); United States v. Barbontin, 907 F.2d 1494, 1498 (5th Cir.1990); United States v. Preakos, 907 F.2d 7, 10 (1st Cir.1990).
We find no merit in the other issues raised in this appeal.
AFFIRMED.