Case Name: Commonwealth v. C. O. Allard
Court: Kentucky Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Kentucky
Decision Date: 1876-09-05
Citations: 8 Ky. Op. 727
Docket Number: 
Parties: Commonwealth v. C. O. Allard.
Judges: 
Reporter: Kentucky Opinions, containing the unreported opinions of the Court of Appeals
Volume: 8
Pages: 727–727

Head Matter:
Commonwealth v. C. O. Allard.
Criminal Law — Concealed Weapons.
An indictment for carrying concealed weapons is good where the charge is made in the language of the statute.
Indictment.
In an indictment for carrying concealed weapons it is not necessary to aver that the defendant was not within the exceptions provided for in a separate section of the statute. Such exceptions are matters of defense.
APPEAL FROM McCRACKEN CIRCUIT COURT.
September 5, 1876.
B. A. Neal, Moss, for appellant.

Opinion:
Opinion by
Judge Lindsay:
The indictment in this case is good. It charges substantially, in the language of the statute, that the defendant unlawfully carried concealed on his person a pistol, the same being a deadly weapon. The descriptive part of the indictment does not state that the weapon was a deadly one, but the facts set out in the body of the pleading constitute a public offense, and gave notice to the defendant of what is intended. The general descriptive charge may, therefore, be treated as surplusage.
It is not necessary to aver that the defendant was not within the exceptions provided for in' a separate section of the statute. These exceptions are matters of defense which must be affirmatively proved by the party defending under them.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded for further proper proceedings.