Case Name: Jeanette ARLINE, Appellant, v. Bridene GRANT, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1973-01-10
Citations: 272 So. 2d 9
Docket Number: No. 72-695
Parties: Jeanette ARLINE, Appellant, v. Bridene GRANT, Appellee.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 272
Pages: 9–9

Head Matter:
Jeanette ARLINE, Appellant, v. Bridene GRANT, Appellee.
No. 72-695.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan. 10, 1973.
Horton, Schwartz & Perse, Fuller, Bru-mer, Moss & Cohen, Miami, for appellant.
Preddy, Haddad, Kutner & Hardy and Burt E. Redlus, Miami, for appellee.
Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The plaintiff appeals from a final judgment rendered after a jury verdict was reported for the defendant. The point involved urges that the court committed reversible error when it allowed a state statute as to the speed limit on state highways to be read into evidence. Appellant contends that the evidence in the record is only susceptible to the interpretation that the area in question was not subject to the general statute. The record demonstrates that the statute is relevant to the issue of negligence as presented to the jury.
Affirmed.