Case Name: Mark Vernon JAMES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1985-12-12
Citations: 479 So. 2d 315
Docket Number: No. 85-540
Parties: Mark Vernon JAMES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ORFINGER and COWART, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 479
Pages: 315–316

Head Matter:
Mark Vernon JAMES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 85-540.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Dec. 12, 1985.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Michael O’Neill, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard B. Martell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Day-tona Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
DAUKSCH, Judge.
This is an appeal from a sentence which is a departure from the sentencing guidelines. Although the trial court asserted in its reasons for departure that appellant twice violated his probation, the record reflects that he violated his probation once.
When a probationer violates his probation he is subject to being resen-tenced upwards one cell. Boldes v. State, 475 So.2d 1356 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). Here the sentence was enhanced five cells. This was error so we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing.
Sentence VACATED; REMANDED.
ORFINGER and COWART, JJ., concur.