Case Name: Erik MOTA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2011-11-04
Citations: 73 So. 3d 850
Docket Number: No. 5D10-1471
Parties: Erik MOTA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ORFINGER, C.J., GRIFFIN and PALMER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 73
Pages: 850–850

Head Matter:
Erik MOTA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D10-1471.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Nov. 4, 2011.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Noel A. Pelella, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Roark Wall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477, 101 S.Ct. 1880, 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981) (asserting that accused may, after invoking right to counsel, voluntarily initiate further communication with police).
ORFINGER, C.J., GRIFFIN and PALMER, JJ., concur.