Case Name: Felicia Y. BENJAMIN; Craig D. Benjamin, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NATIONWIDE LENDING CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, and Countrywide Home Loans, Incorporated; Select Portfolio Servicing, Incorporated, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-02-01
Citations: 410 F. App'x 672
Docket Number: No. 10-1312
Parties: Felicia Y. BENJAMIN; Craig D. Benjamin, Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. NATIONWIDE LENDING CORPORATION, Defendant—Appellee, and Countrywide Home Loans, Incorporated; Select Portfolio Servicing, Incorporated, Defendants.
Judges: Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 410
Pages: 672–672

Head Matter:
Felicia Y. BENJAMIN; Craig D. Benjamin, Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. NATIONWIDE LENDING CORPORATION, Defendant—Appellee, and Countrywide Home Loans, Incorporated; Select Portfolio Servicing, Incorporated, Defendants.
No. 10-1312.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 18, 2011.
Decided: Feb. 1, 2011.
Scott C. Borison, Legg Law Firm, LLC, Frederick, Maryland; Christopher M. Le-febvre, Claude Lefebvre Christopher Le-febvre, P.C., Pawtucket, Rhode Island, for Appellants.
Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Felicia Y. Benjamin and Craig D. Benjamin appeal from the district court's order denying relief on their action brought pursuant to the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1601 et seq. (West 2006 & Supp.2010). We have reviewed the record and the Appellants' brief and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Benjamin v. Nationwide Lending Corp., No. 8:08-cv-02511-AW, 2010 WL 610768 (D. Md. filed Feb. 16, 2010 & entered Feb. 17, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.