Case Name: EURODIF S.A., Compagnie Générale Des Matiéres Nucléaires and Cogema, Inc., et.al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant
Court: United States Court of International Trade
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-08-03
Citations: 442 F. Supp. 2d 1367
Docket Number: Slip Op. 06-124; Court No. 02-00219
Parties: EURODIF S.A., Compagnie Générale Des Matiéres Nucléaires and Cogema, Inc., et.al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant.
Judges: Before: POGUE, WALLACH, and EATON, Judges.
Reporter: Federal Supplement 2d
Volume: 442
Pages: 1367–1367

Head Matter:
EURODIF S.A., Compagnie Générale Des Matiéres Nucléaires and Cogema, Inc., et.al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant.
Slip Op. 06-124.
Court No. 02-00219.
United States Court of International Trade.
Aug. 3, 2006.
Before: POGUE, WALLACH, and EATON, Judges.

Opinion:
JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.
On May 18, 2006, we remanded the captioned case to the Department of Commerce ("Commerce") to exclude low enriched uranium enriched under so-called separative work unit contracts from the scope of the antidumping duty order. See Eurodif S.A. v. United States, 30 CIT -, -, 431 F.Supp.2d 1350 (2006). Commerce has since filed a remand determination; the parties have commented thereon. Upon review of that determination, and the parties' comments and rebuttals thereto, we find that Commerce has complied with our remand order. We understand the parties' technical comments on the language of the order and the certification that importers will have to complete upon the entry of low enriched uranium. These technical objections, however, would be better addressed in the context of a concrete dispute over a specific entry. Cf. Nat'l Park Hospitality Ass'n v. DOI, 538 U.S. 803, 812, 123 S.Ct. 2026, 155 L.Ed.2d 1017 (2003); 19 C.F.R. § 351.225 (outlining the procedure for "scope" determinations). Therefore, it is hereby:
ORDERED that the Department of Commerce's remand determination is sustained.