Case Name: David E. HENDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harry PAULSON, Secretary of the Treasury; The National Reconaissonce Office (NRO), Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-12-15
Citations: 305 F. App'x 81
Docket Number: No. 08-1861
Parties: David E. HENDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harry PAULSON, Secretary of the Treasury; The National Reconaissonce Office (NRO), Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 305
Pages: 81–82

Head Matter:
David E. HENDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harry PAULSON, Secretary of the Treasury; The National Reconaissonce Office (NRO), Defendants—Appellees.
No. 08-1861.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 11, 2008.
Decided: Dec. 15, 2008.
David E. Henderson, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
David E. Henderson appeals the district court's order granting his request to proceed in forma pauperis but dismissing this case as patently frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Henderson v. Paulson, No. 1:08-cv-01613-WMN (D.Md. July 16, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.