Case Name: David HALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1984-11-14
Citations: 458 So. 2d 1193
Docket Number: No. AX-32
Parties: David HALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: JOANOS and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 458
Pages: 1193–1194

Head Matter:
David HALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. AX-32.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nov. 14, 1984.
Michael E. Allen, Public Defender, and Paula S. Saunders, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Gary L. Printy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appel-lee.

Opinion:
BARFIELD, Judge.
The trial court departed from the sentencing guidelines for the following stated reason:
The court has gone outside the sentencing guidelines in this case on you, Mr. Hall, because you were previously placed on probation and the court considers the fact that you violated the conditions of that probation to be sufficient aggravating circumstances to no longer be bound by the sentencing guidelines. For that reason the court has gone outside the guidelines.
We affirm the departure from the guidelines. Carter v. State, 452 So.2d 953 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Gordon v. State, 454 So.2d 657 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).
JOANOS and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.