Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jonathan Matthew WOOD, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-08-09
Citations: 525 F. App'x 914
Docket Number: No. 13-10367
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jonathan Matthew WOOD, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILSON, MARTIN and HILL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 525
Pages: 914–915

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jonathan Matthew WOOD, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-10367
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Aug. 9, 2013.
Lennard B. Register, III, Robert G. Davies, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Pensacola, Pamela C. Marsh, Francis Todd Williams, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Gainesville, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Chet Kaufman, Randolph Patterson Murrell, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Tallahassee, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Jonathan Matthew Wood, Coleman, FL, pro se.
Before WILSON, MARTIN and HILL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Chet Kaufman, counsel for Jonathan Matthew Wood in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examina tion of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Wood's conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.