Case Name: McDonald v. Dayton
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2002-02-19
Citations: 94 Ohio St. 3d 1475
Docket Number: 01-2282
Parties: McDonald v. Dayton.
Judges: 
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 94
Pages: 1475–1475

Head Matter:
MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS
01-2282.
McDonald v. Dayton.

Opinion:
Montgomery App. No. 18721. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and cross-appeal and claimed appeal of right. It appears from the records of this court that appellee/crossappellant has not filed a memorandum in response and in support of cross-appeal, due January 30, 2002, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute the cross-appeal with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the cross-appeal be, and hereby is dismissed, sua sponte.
The appeal of the city of Dayton et al. remains pending.