Case Name: Chase Carmen HUNTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jacqueline K. CUNNINGHAM, Individually, & In Her Official Capacity as Commissioner of Insurance for Virginia; Virginia Attorney General; Virginia Bureau of Insurance, the, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-11-05
Citations: 621 F. App'x 255
Docket Number: No. 15-1145
Parties: Chase Carmen HUNTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jacqueline K. CUNNINGHAM, Individually, & In Her Official Capacity as Commissioner of Insurance for Virginia; Virginia Attorney General; Virginia Bureau of Insurance, the, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before DUNCAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 621
Pages: 255–256

Head Matter:
Chase Carmen HUNTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jacqueline K. CUNNINGHAM, Individually, & In Her Official Capacity as Commissioner of Insurance for Virginia; Virginia Attorney General; Virginia Bureau of Insurance, the, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15-1145.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 17, 2015.
Decided: Nov. 5, 2015.
Chase Carmen Hunter, Appellant Pro Se.
Before DUNCAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Chase Carmen Hunter appeals the district court's order dismissing her complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hunter v. Cunningham, No. 3:14-cv-00704-HEH (E.D.Va. Jan. 5, 2015). We also deny her motion seeking mandamus relief and other pending motions, including her motions to electronically file her submissions, proceed in forma pauperis, and correct the docket. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.