Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Timothy Dale CROCKETT, a/k/a Timothy Howard Crockett, a/k/a Timothy Dale Neill, a/k/a Timothy Dwayne Pope, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-06-05
Citations: 280 F. App'x 266
Docket Number: No. 08-6227
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Timothy Dale CROCKETT, a/k/a Timothy Howard Crockett, a/k/a Timothy Dale Neill, a/k/a Timothy Dwayne Pope, Jr., Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 280
Pages: 266–266

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Timothy Dale CROCKETT, a/k/a Timothy Howard Crockett, a/k/a Timothy Dale Neill, a/k/a Timothy Dwayne Pope, Jr., Defendant—Appellant.
No. 08-6227.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 29, 2008.
Decided: June 5, 2008.
Timothy Dale Crockett, Appellant Pro Se. Harold Watson Gowdy, III, Office of the United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Timothy Dale Crockett appeals the district court's order denying his motion to reconsider a prior order denying his motion to modify restitution payments. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Crockett, No. 7:98-cr-00798-GRA-1, 2008 WL 153976 (D.S.C. Jan. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.