Case Name: Richard Willard KAY, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1954-04-14
Citations: 212 F.2d 795
Docket Number: No. 12121
Parties: Richard Willard KAY, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 212
Pages: 795–795

Head Matter:
Richard Willard KAY, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 12121.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
April 14, 1954.
Millsaps Fitzhugh, Memphis, Tenn., for appellee.
Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and MC-ALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record and briefs of the parties on an appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate sentence, and it appearing that the contentions of appellant, in all essential details, as to what occurred on his trial, are directly refuted by the transcript of the evidence, and that it is conclusively shown, on the record, that appellant was not entitled to the relief sought,
Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the order of the district court denying appellant's motion to vacate sentence be and is hereby affirmed. Tatum v. United States, 9 Cir., 204 F.2d 324; Garcia v. United States, 9 Cir., 197 F.2d 687; Morales v. United States, 1 Cir., 187 F.2d 518.