Case Name: City of Danbury v. John B. Falvo et al.
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1953-01-13
Citations: 139 Conn. 387
Docket Number: 
Parties: City of Danbury v. John B. Falvo et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 139
Pages: 387–388

Head Matter:
City of Danbury v. John B. Falvo et al.
Brown, C. J., Jennings, Baldwin, Inglis and O’Sullivan, Js.
Argued December 4, 1952
decided January 13, 1953
T. Clark Hull, for the appellants (defendants).
Boceo E. LaCava, with whom, on the brief, was Abram W. Sipro, for the appellee (plaintiff).

Opinion:
Baldwin, J.
The facts in this ease are similar to these in Danbury v. Corbett, decided this day, and the identical legal question is presented. The decision in that case impels a like decision in this one.
There is error, the judgment is set aside and the case is remanded with direction to render judgment for the defendants.
In this opinion Jennings and O'Sullivan Js., concurred; Brown, C. J., and Inglis, J., dissented.