Case Name: Robert L. SHARPSTEEN, a minor, by and through his father and next friend, Leslie Sharpsteen, and Leslie Sharpsteen, individually, Appellants, v. Karl L. KEESLER and Randolph W. Keesler, a minor, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1965-09-21
Citations: 178 So. 2d 623
Docket Number: No. 65-141
Parties: Robert L. SHARPSTEEN, a minor, by and through his father and next friend, Leslie Sharpsteen, and Leslie Sharpsteen, individually, Appellants, v. Karl L. KEESLER and Randolph W. Keesler, a minor, Appellees.
Judges: Before TILLMAN PEARSON, CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 178
Pages: 623–623

Head Matter:
Robert L. SHARPSTEEN, a minor, by and through his father and next friend, Leslie Sharpsteen, and Leslie Sharpsteen, individually, Appellants, v. Karl L. KEESLER and Randolph W. Keesler, a minor, Appellees.
No. 65-141.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
Sept. 21, 1965.
Rehearing Denied Oct. 12, 1965.
Donald F. March, Miami, for appellants.
Dean & Adams, Miami, for appellees.
Before TILLMAN PEARSON, CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This appeal involves a negligence action, wherein the appellants-plaintiffs brought an action against the appellees as defendants, as a result of an intersection collision, wherein the appellant, Robert L. Sharp-steen, was a passenger on a motor scooter driven by a third person, not a party to this proceeding. A jury verdict was returned in favor of the defendants.
The only point preserved for review by the appellants is the propriety of certain instructions given by the trial court. No objections to these instructions were made in accordance with.Rule.2.6, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, 31 F.S.A. and, therefore, it appears that the final judgment rendered on the jury verdict should be affirmed on the authority of Joe Reinertson, Inc. v. Nelson, Fla.App.1964, 160 So.2d 723; Karl v. David Ritter Sportservice, Inc., Fla.App.1964, 164 So.2d 23; Henningsen v. Smith, Fla.App.1965, 174 So.2d 85.
Affirmed.