Case Name: CITY OF SIOUX FALLS, Respondent, v. JAGER, Appellant
Court: South Dakota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: South Dakota
Decision Date: 1944-02-11
Citations: 69 S.D. 578
Docket Number: 
Parties: CITY OF SIOUX FALLS, Respondent, v. JAGER, Appellant
Judges: All the Judges concur, except SMITH, J., absent and not sitting.
Reporter: South Dakota Reports
Volume: 69
Pages: 578–578

Head Matter:
CITY OF SIOUX FALLS, Respondent, v. JAGER, Appellant
(13 N. W.2d 52.)
(File No. 8656. Opinion filed February 11, 1944.)
Louis H. Smith, of Sioux Falls, for Appellant.
Roy D. Burns and R. G. May, both of Sioux Falls, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
An information was filed charging the defendant with the sale of liquor on a certain day in March, 1943. The respondent has filed in this court a written confession of error in which there are certain recitals of questions asked relating to prior prosecutions.
An examination of the record indicates that there is prejudicial error and that the judgment cannot be sustained. State v. Dansky, 69 S. D. 311, 9 N. W.2d 752.
The judgment and order appealed from are reversed.
All the Judges concur, except SMITH, J., absent and not sitting.