Case Name: Kimberly Ann MILES and Jody Haynes, Appellants, v. Daniel WEINGRAD, M.D., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2012-12-19
Citations: 103 So. 3d 259
Docket Number: No. 3D12-779
Parties: Kimberly Ann MILES and Jody Haynes, Appellants, v. Daniel WEINGRAD, M.D., Appellee.
Judges: Before WELLS, C.J., and SUAREZ, J., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 103
Pages: 259–260

Head Matter:
Kimberly Ann MILES and Jody Haynes, Appellants, v. Daniel WEINGRAD, M.D., Appellee.
No. 3D12-779.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 19, 2012.
Alex Alvarez; Robert S. Glazier, for appellants.
Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt and Bruce M. Stanley, Sr., Ft. Myers; Hicks Porter, Ebenfeld & Stein, Dinah Stein and Mark Hicks, for appellee.
Before WELLS, C.J., and SUAREZ, J., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
WELLS, Chief Judge.
Finding no conflict between our prior opinion in Weingrad v. Miles, 29 So.3d 406 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010), and the Supreme Court's opinion in American Optical Corp. v. Spiewak, 73 So.3d 120 (Fla.2011), we affirm.