Case Name: Brenda L. SIECKMANN, Respondent, v. CRUM & FORSTER SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2010-07-13
Citations: 321 S.W.3d 374
Docket Number: No. ED 93459
Parties: Brenda L. SIECKMANN, Respondent, v. CRUM & FORSTER SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.
Judges: Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J. and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR. and PATRICIA L. COHEN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 321
Pages: 374–375

Head Matter:
Brenda L. SIECKMANN, Respondent, v. CRUM & FORSTER SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.
No. ED 93459.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
July 13, 2010.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Sept. 15, 2010.
Application for Transfer Denied Oct. 26, 2010.
Philip C. Graham, Clayton, MO, for Appellant.
Maurice B. Graham, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J. and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR. and PATRICIA L. COHEN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company ("C & F") appeals from the grant of summary judgment in favor of Brenda L. Sieckmann ("Sieckmann"). C & F alleges six points on appeal. Most of C & F's points have to do with whether Interstate Brands Corporation ("IBC") was an additional insured under the C&F policy.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).