Case Name: James D. MORGAN, Appellant/Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-04-10
Citations: 364 S.W.3d 265
Docket Number: No. ED 96584
Parties: James D. MORGAN, Appellant/Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., MARY K HOFF, J. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 364
Pages: 265–265

Head Matter:
James D. MORGAN, Appellant/Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 96584.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
April 10, 2012.
Andrew Zleit, Missouri Public Defender Office, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Dora A. Fichter, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., MARY K HOFF, J. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
James D. Morgan appeals from the motion court's findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order (judgment) denying his Rule 29.15 Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct the Judgment or Sentence after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential or precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the motion court's judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).