Case Name: PRADA v. ADMINISTRATOR, SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1993-05-25
Citations: 208 Ga. App. 710
Docket Number: A93A0117
Parties: PRADA v. ADMINISTRATOR, SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION.
Judges: Johnson and Smith, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 208
Pages: 710–710

Head Matter:
A93A0117.
PRADA v. ADMINISTRATOR, SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION.
(432 SE2d 274)
Decided May 25, 1993.
Humberto 0. Prada, pro se.
Lawson & Davis, James H. Baskin, for appellee.

Opinion:
Blackburn, Judge.
This is an appeal from a dispossessory action in which a Writ of Possession was ordered on behalf of appellee, Administrator, Small Business Administration (SBA), against appellant, Humberto Prada. The SBA obtained a dispossessory warrant on June 29, 1992, and a trial was held, without a jury, on July 22, 1992 in the State Court of DeKalb County. Prada, appealing pro se, asserts several enumerations of error all raising general grounds. "However, no transcript of the proceeding is present in the record before us. 'Where no transcript of evidence is filed all grounds requiring a consideration of evidence must be affirmed. [Cit.]' [Cit.]" Southerland v. Oxford Group, 162 Ga. App. 213 (290 SE2d 556) (1982). See also P. H. L. Dev. Corp. v. Smith, 174 Ga. App. 328 (329 SE2d 545) (1985).
Judgment affirmed.
Johnson and Smith, JJ., concur.