Case Name: OTTO H. URBANECK, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1908-06-15
Citations: 75 N.J.L. 938
Docket Number: 
Parties: OTTO H. URBANECK, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 75
Pages: 938–938

Head Matter:
OTTO H. URBANECK, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Argued January 6, 1908 —
Decided June 15, 1908.
On error to the Supreme Court.
For the plaintiff in error, Vredenburgh, Wall & Carey.
For the defendant in error, Weller & Lichtenstein.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Justice Reed, delivered in the court below, reported in 45 Vroom 393.
For affirmance — Ti-ie Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Bogert, Vroom, Green. Gray, Dill, J.J. 11.
For reversal — None.