Case Name: John A. HUSKEY, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Betty A. HUSKEY, Respondent/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1996-04-23
Citations: 922 S.W.2d 422
Docket Number: No. 68541
Parties: John A. HUSKEY, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Betty A. HUSKEY, Respondent/Appellant.
Judges: Before CRANE, C.J., AHRENS, J., and BLACKMAR, Senior Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 922
Pages: 422–422

Head Matter:
John A. HUSKEY, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Betty A. HUSKEY, Respondent/Appellant.
No. 68541.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
April 23, 1996.
Michael C. Margherio, Amelung, Wulff & Willenbrock, P.C., St. Louis, for appellant.
Robert M. Wohler, O’Fallon, for respondent.
Before CRANE, C.J., AHRENS, J., and BLACKMAR, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from the trial court's judgment in a dissolution ease. The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carrón, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).