Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Aurelio Roman, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2005-11-07
Citations: 23 A.D.3d 413
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Aurelio Roman, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 23
Pages: 413–414

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Aurelio Roman, Appellant.
[803 NYS2d 433]

Opinion:
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dowling, J.), rendered March 12, 2003, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the evidence presented at the so-called "Sirois" hearing (see Matter of Holtzman v Hellenbrand, 92 AD2d 405 [1983]), and the inferences that logically flow therefrom, were sufficient to support the Supreme Court's determination, under the clear and convincing evidence standard, that the defendant engaged in conduct that caused several witnesses to be unavailable to testify at trial (see People v Lovett, 18 AD3d 577 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 765 [2005]; People v Perkins, 7 AD3d 644 [2004]; People v Field, 308 AD2d 548 [2003]; People v McClarin, 299 AD2d 495 [2002]).
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit. Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Krausman and Covello, JJ., concur.