Case Name: HAROLD L. DECKER, APPELLANT, v. AUGUSTUS NASH, RECORDER, ETC., ET AL., RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1929-02-04
Citations: 105 N.J.L. 488
Docket Number: 
Parties: HAROLD L. DECKER, APPELLANT, v. AUGUSTUS NASH, RECORDER, ETC., ET AL., RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 105
Pages: 488–488

Head Matter:
HAROLD L. DECKER, APPELLANT, v. AUGUSTUS NASH, RECORDER, ETC., ET AL., RESPONDENT.
Argued October 24, 1928
Decided February 4, 1929.
For the appellant, Earl A. Merrill.
For the respondent, Paul Q. Oliver.

Opinion:
Pee Cueiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Chiee Justice, Teenchaed, Paekee, Kalisch, Katzenbach, Lloyd, Van Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Deae, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.