Case Name: Phillip MANGANELLI, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-07-26
Citations: 582 So. 2d 826
Docket Number: No. 91-00038
Parties: Phillip MANGANELLI, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: DANAHY, A.C.J., and FRANK and HALL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 582
Pages: 826–826

Head Matter:
Phillip MANGANELLI, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 91-00038.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
July 26, 1991.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender and Jennifer Y. Fogle, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and William I. Munsey, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the appellant's judgment and sentence, but remand for the trial court to conform the written sentence to its oral pronouncement that the appellant serve 364 days in the county jail as a special condition of probation. The written sentence erroneously reflects that the appellant serve 364 days followed by five years on probation. The appellant need not be present for this purpose. Esposito v. State, 424 So.2d 160 (Fla.2d DCA 1982).
DANAHY, A.C.J., and FRANK and HALL, JJ., concur.