Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Henry Garza GALLEGO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-06-16
Citations: 329 F. App'x 115
Docket Number: No. 08-10487
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Henry Garza GALLEGO, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: TROTT, McKEOWN, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 329
Pages: 115–116

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Henry Garza GALLEGO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-10487.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 12, 2009.
Filed June 16, 2009.
Jesse Joseph Figueroa, Assistant U.S., George Ferko, Assistant U.S., USTU-Of-fice of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Stephen Jonathan Young, Williamson & Young, PC, Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: TROTT, McKEOWN, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Because 18 U.S.C. § 4082(a) defines a type of "escape" under 18 U.S.C. § 751, the district court's jury instruction was not improper and did not improperly amend the indictment. See United States v. Jones, 569 F.2d 499, 501 (9th Cir.1978) (using § 4082 as an example of "escape" under 18 U.S.C. § 751).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.