Case Name: FIZZANO BROTHERS CONCRETE PRODUCTS, INC. v. XLN, INC., Successor in Interest to System Development Group, Inc. v. Shore Consultants, Ltd., Gregg A. Montgomery, David Binder and XLNT Software Solutions, Inc. Petition of Fizzano Brothers Concrete Products, Inc.
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2010-05-19
Citations: 994 A.2d 1081
Docket Number: 
Parties: FIZZANO BROTHERS CONCRETE PRODUCTS, INC. v. XLN, INC., Successor in Interest to System Development Group, Inc. v. Shore Consultants, Ltd., Gregg A. Montgomery, David Binder and XLNT Software Solutions, Inc. Petition of Fizzano Brothers Concrete Products, Inc.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 994
Pages: 1081–1082

Head Matter:
FIZZANO BROTHERS CONCRETE PRODUCTS, INC. v. XLN, INC., Successor in Interest to System Development Group, Inc. v. Shore Consultants, Ltd., Gregg A. Montgomery, David Binder and XLNT Software Solutions, Inc. Petition of Fizzano Brothers Concrete Products, Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
May 19, 2010.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 19th day of MAY, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED limited to the following issues:
1. Does the de facto merger doctrine always require proof of continuity of ownership?
2. Did the Superior Court improperly substitute its own fact-finding for that of the trial court?