Case Name: The Ponds Homeowners Association, Inc. v. The Ponds, Inc., of Hotchkiss Grove et al.
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1993-03-16
Citations: 30 Conn. App. 919
Docket Number: 11342
Parties: The Ponds Homeowners Association, Inc. v. The Ponds, Inc., of Hotchkiss Grove et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Appellate Reports
Volume: 30
Pages: 919–919

Head Matter:
The Ponds Homeowners Association, Inc. v. The Ponds, Inc., of Hotchkiss Grove et al.
(11342)
Heiman, Freedman and Schaller, Js.
Argued February 23 —
decision released March 16, 1993
Thomas E. Crosby, for the appellants (defendants).
Richard F. Connors, for the appellee (plaintiff).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
After thorough review of the record and briefs, and hearing oral argument, we conclude that the granting of the prejudment remedy by the trial court was supported by probable cause and its issuance was, therefore, not clearly erroneous. Anderson v. Nedovich, 19 Conn. App. 85, 91, 561 A.2d 948 (1989).
The order of the trial court granting the prejudgment remedy is affirmed.