Case Name: Jimmy Lee WALKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-10-11
Citations: 681 So. 2d 824
Docket Number: No. 94-03091
Parties: Jimmy Lee WALKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: RYDER, A.C.J., and LAZZARA and QUINCE, JJ., concur. ■
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 681
Pages: 824–824

Head Matter:
Jimmy Lee WALKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 94-03091.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Oct. 11, 1996.
James C. Banks, Special Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Robert A Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Patricia J. Hakes, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this consolidated appeal, the appellant challenges his judgments and sentences, imposed after separate jury trials, in lower court case numbers 94-1448, 94-1450, and 94-3232. We reject his arguments in support of reversal in ease numbers 94-1450 and 94-3232 and affirm. We agree, however, that the kidnapping conviction in case number 94-1448 must be reversed and vacated because the victim's movement and confinement was inconsequential and inherent in relation to the felony of robbery. See Faison v. State, 426 So.2d 963 (Fla.1983). We otherwise affirm the other convictions and sentences in that case.
Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
RYDER, A.C.J., and LAZZARA and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
. Because the appellant does not challenge the trial court's upward departure sentence in this case, there is no need to remand for resentencing as to the affirmed convictions.