Case Name: Matthew RANCOSKY, Administrator DBN of the Estate of Leann Rancosky and Matthew Rancosky, Executor of the Estate of Martin L. Rancosky, Respondent, v. WASHINGTON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, as Successor by Merger to Conseco Health Insurance Company, formerly known as Capital American Life Insurance Company, Petitioner
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2016-08-30
Citations: 144 A.3d 926
Docket Number: 
Parties: Matthew RANCOSKY, Administrator DBN of the Estate of Leann Rancosky and Matthew Rancosky, Executor of the Estate of Martin L. Rancosky, Respondent, v. WASHINGTON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, as Successor by Merger to Conseco Health Insurance Company, formerly known as Capital American Life Insurance Company, Petitioner.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 144
Pages: 926–926

Head Matter:
Matthew RANCOSKY, Administrator DBN of the Estate of Leann Rancosky and Matthew Rancosky, Executor of the Estate of Martin L. Rancosky, Respondent, v. WASHINGTON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, as Successor by Merger to Conseco Health Insurance Company, formerly known as Capital American Life Insurance Company, Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Aug. 30, 2016.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 30th day of August, 2016, the Petition for Alowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue[s] set forth below. Alocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue[s], as stated by petitioner, is:
Whether this Court should ratify the requirements of Terletsky v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co., 437 Pa.Super. 108, 649 A.2d 680 (1994), appeal denied, 640 Pa. 641, 659 A.2d 560 (1996), for establishing insurer bad faith under 42 Pa.C.S. § 8371, and assuming the answer to be in the affirmative, whether the Superior Court erred in holding that Terletsky factor of a "motive of self-interest or ill-will" is merely a discretionary consideration rather than a mandatory prerequisite to proving bad faith?