Case Name: John H. Stenger and James P. De Mattos, Appellants, v. Henry Roeder, City of Whatcom, and Samuel Belford, Respondents
Court: Washington Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Washington
Decision Date: 1892-01-04
Citations: 3 Wash. 412
Docket Number: No. 240
Parties: John H. Stenger and James P. De Mattos, Appellants, v. Henry Roeder, City of Whatcom, and Samuel Belford, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Washington Reports
Volume: 3
Pages: 412–418

Head Matter:
[No. 240.
Decided January 4, 1892.]
John H. Stenger and James P. De Mattos, Appellants, v. Henry Roeder, City of Whatcom, and Samuel Belford, Respondents.
APPEALS — EQUITY CASES — TESTIMONY NOT IN RECORD.
The supreme court -will not reyiew the judgment of the court below in an equity case, where the record is made up of the pleadings and findings of the trial court, without the testimony submitted therein.
Appeal from Superior Court, Whatcom County.
Bruce & Brown, and J. P. Be Mattos, for appellants.
Fairchild & Bawson, for respondents.

Opinion:
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Stiles, J.
This was'an action to enjoin the execution of a deed of real estate, alleged to have been sold by the marshal of the city of Whatcom, for non-payment of certain taxes, and to set aside the certificates given by the marshal showing the aforesaid sale. Upon the final hearing, the relief prayed for was granted by the court below, and the case has been brought here upon the pleadings and findings of the superior court, without the testimony.
Under the ruling in Enos v. Wilcox, ante, p. 44, this court cannot review the case under these circumstances, and the judgment is therefore affirmed.
Anders, O. J., and Hoyt, Scott and Dunbar, JJ., concur.