Case Name: PENINSULAR FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., Appellant (Defendant), v. Adrian J. MAXWELL, Appellee (Plaintiff)
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1976-02-03
Citations: 326 So. 2d 45
Docket Number: No. Z-379
Parties: PENINSULAR FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., Appellant (Defendant), v. Adrian J. MAXWELL, Appellee (Plaintiff).
Judges: RAWLS, Acting C. J., and MILLS and McCORD, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 326
Pages: 45–45

Head Matter:
PENINSULAR FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., Appellant (Defendant), v. Adrian J. MAXWELL, Appellee (Plaintiff).
No. Z-379.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Feb. 3, 1976.
William A. Parsons, of Gosney, Haas, Cameron & Parsons, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Thomas R. Hess, of Ossinsky & Krol, Daytona Beach, and Sutton G. Hilyard, Jr., Orlando, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Upon considering the briefs, the record, and oral argument, we find that the record fails to conclusively establish that there was no genuine triable issue of a material fact as to the first loss alleged in Count I of the Complaint, but we find that the record conclusively establishes the absence of any genuine triable issue of a material fact as to the second loss alleged in Count I of the Complaint.
Accordingly, the interlocutory appeal is granted as to the first loss and the cause is remanded to the trial court for the purpose of receiving evidence as to the first loss, but the interlocutory appeal is dismissed as to the second loss.
RAWLS, Acting C. J., and MILLS and McCORD, JJ., concur.