Case Name: Joan M. Olivo, Appellant, v. Edubijes Olivo, Sr., Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1993-05-28
Citations: 193 A.D.2d 1067
Docket Number: Appeal No. 1
Parties: Joan M. Olivo, Appellant, v Edubijes Olivo, Sr., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 193
Pages: 1067–1067

Head Matter:
Joan M. Olivo, Appellant, v Edubijes Olivo, Sr., Respondent.
(Appeal No. 1.)
[600 NYS2d 648]

Opinion:
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The court properly determined that the enhanced portion of the retirement benefits payable to defendant under Kodak's Resource Redeployment and Retirement Plan is separate property of defendant (see, Tanchick v Tanchick, 190 AD2d 1076; Biddlecom v Biddlecom, 113 AD2d 66). Neither the parties' separation agreement nor the stipulated Qualified Domestic Relations Order provide that the enhanced benefits would be subject to equitable distribution (see, Biddlecom v Biddlecom, supra, at 67). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Rosenbloom, J.—Equitable Distribution.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Green, Lawton, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.