Case Name: Bank of Burlington v. John M. Catlin
Court: Vermont Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Vermont
Decision Date: 1839-01
Citations: 11 Vt. 106
Docket Number: 
Parties: Bank of Burlington v. John M. Catlin.
Judges: 
Reporter: Vermont Reports
Volume: 11
Pages: 106–106

Head Matter:
Bank of Burlington v. John M. Catlin.
(In Chancery,)
(Practice,)

Opinion:
The orator, to prove notice to the defendant, offered affidadavits to show that a copy of the bill was seasonably deliverered, by an indifferent person, to the defendant in the city of New York.
The bill was accompanied by the ordinary subpoena, which, however, contained no direction to the person delivering the copy. The court held the notice to be insufficient, and that defendant was not affected by it.