Case Name: Mary Lazona SUMNER, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA CITRUS CANNERS COOPERATIVE, Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1965-02-24
Citations: 172 So. 2d 237
Docket Number: No. 33947
Parties: Mary Lazona SUMNER, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA CITRUS CANNERS COOPERATIVE, Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
Judges: DREW, C. J., and ROBERTS, THOR-NAL, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, TT., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 172
Pages: 237–237

Head Matter:
Mary Lazona SUMNER, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA CITRUS CANNERS COOPERATIVE, Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
No. 33947.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Feb. 24, 1965.
Rehearing Denied March 17, 1965.
F. Perry Odom and Carl R. Pennington, Jr., of Ervin, Pennington, Vara & Jacobs, Tallahassee, for petitioner.
John McQuigg, of Shackleford, Farrior, Stallings, Glos & Evans, Tampa, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission hearing date October 19, 1964.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
DREW, C. J., and ROBERTS, THOR-NAL, O'CONNELL and CALDWELL, TT., concur.