Case Name: James L. HUSTON and Dayton Bait Company, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BUCKEYE BAIT CORPORATION, Buckeye Molding Company, and William H. Robinson, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1956-10-22
Citations: 237 F.2d 920
Docket Number: No. 12718
Parties: James L. HUSTON and Dayton Bait Company, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BUCKEYE BAIT CORPORATION, Buckeye Molding Company, and William H. Robinson, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before ALLEN, McALLISTER, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 237
Pages: 920–920

Head Matter:
James L. HUSTON and Dayton Bait Company, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BUCKEYE BAIT CORPORATION, Buckeye Molding Company, and William H. Robinson, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 12718.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
Oct. 22, 1956.
Des Jardins, Robinson & Keiser, Cincinnati, Ohio, Henry G. Dybvig, Dayton, Ohio, for appellants.
Irvin V. Gleim, Dayton, Ohio, Dexter N. Shaw, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellees.
Before ALLEN, McALLISTER, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The above cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel, and the court being duly advised,
Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the district court be and is hereby affirmed upon the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the district court and for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Cecil. 145 F.Supp. 600.