Case Name: James KING, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-05-30
Citations: 820 So. 2d 941
Docket Number: No. SC01-1883
Parties: James KING, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 820
Pages: 941–941

Head Matter:
James KING, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. SC01-1883.
Supreme Court of Florida.
May 30, 2002.
Neal T. McShane, Orlando, FL, for Petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach,. FL, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted for review the decision of the Fifth District Court of Appeal in King v. State, 790 So.2d 477 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001), which certified conflict with Winter v. State, 781 So.2d 1111 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001), and certified the following question for review:
DOES THE OFFICE OF THE STATEWIDE PROSECUTOR HAVE JURISDICTION TO PROSECUTE A BURGLARY IN THE COUNTY IN WHICH IT WAS COMMITTED IF IT IS ALLEGED THAT THE BURGLARY WAS A PART OF A BUSINESS ENTERPRISE ENGAGED IN MUL-TI-CIRCUIT CRIMES?
Upon further consideration, we find that review was improvidently granted. Accordingly, this .review proceeding is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., concur.