Case Name: Antoine KNIGHTNOR; Demetrice Murray, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Ron ANGELONE; G. Johnson; R.A. Young; Page True; Elswick; J. Armentrout; Barton; R. Austin; J. Bentley; B. Edmonds; John Doe; L. Fleming; D. Mills; R. Riter; D. Armstrong; M. Pair; Mr. Ban, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-09-11
Citations: 18 F. App'x 173
Docket Number: No. 01-6744
Parties: Antoine KNIGHTNOR; Demetrice Murray, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Ron ANGELONE; G. Johnson; R.A. Young; Page True; Elswick; J. Armentrout; Barton; R. Austin; J. Bentley; B. Edmonds; John Doe; L. Fleming; D. Mills; R. Riter; D. Armstrong; M. Pair; Mr. Ban, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 18
Pages: 173–173

Head Matter:
Antoine KNIGHTNOR; Demetrice Murray, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Ron ANGELONE; G. Johnson; R.A. Young; Page True; Elswick; J. Armentrout; Barton; R. Austin; J. Bentley; B. Edmonds; John Doe; L. Fleming; D. Mills; R. Riter; D. Armstrong; M. Pair; Mr. Ban, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 01-6744.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 28, 2001.
Decided Sept. 11, 2001.
Antoine Knightnor, Demetrice Murray, pro se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for ap-pellees.
Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Antoine Knightnor and Demetrice Murray appeal the district court order granting summary judgment in favor of the Defendants in this civil action challenging Division Operating Procedure 864, a prison grooming policy. We have reviewed the record and the district court's memorandum opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Knightnor v. Angelone, CA-00-232-7 (W.D.Va. Apr. 6, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.