Case Name: Mark UMFLEET, Appellant, v. John RIGDON, et al., Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2008-08-19
Citations: 260 S.W.3d 440
Docket Number: No. ED 90590
Parties: Mark UMFLEET, Appellant, v. John RIGDON, et al., Respondents.
Judges: Before KURT S. ODENWALD, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 260
Pages: 440–440

Head Matter:
Mark UMFLEET, Appellant, v. John RIGDON, et al., Respondents.
No. ED 90590.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Aug. 19, 2008.
Daniel H. Rau, Cape Girardeau, MO, for Appellant.
David M. Remley, Cape Girardeau, MO, for Respondents.
Before KURT S. ODENWALD, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Mark Umfleet appeals from the grant of summary judgment in favor of John and Elizabeth Rigdon on Umfleet's vicarious liability and direct negligence claims. We find no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).