Case Name: Butler v. Metcalf
Court: Colorado Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Colorado
Decision Date: 1892-04
Citations: 17 Colo. 531
Docket Number: 
Parties: Butler v. Metcalf.
Judges: 
Reporter: Colorado Reports
Volume: 17
Pages: 531–531

Head Matter:
Butler v. Metcalf.
Appeal from, District Court of Lake County.
Messrs. Parsons & Lyles, for appellant. .
Mr. Hugh Butler, pro se.
Mr. A. W. Stone, for. appellee-.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This case is the sequel of the case of Butler v. Hinckley, ante. The cases were argued and have been considered together. ' In this instance the liability of appellant rests entirely upon - the claim that á co-partnership existed between Butler and Carleton. The evidence of such co-partnership is no stronger in this case than in the preceding case.
The decision in the former case must,- therefore, control in this. The judgment of the district court will be accordingly reversed. . .