Case Name: LACLEDE GAS COMPANY, Appellant, v. DIZDAR BROTHERS SEWER AND CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2017-10-17
Citations: 530 S.W.3d 632
Docket Number: No. ED 104786
Parties: LACLEDE GAS COMPANY, Appellant, v. DIZDAR BROTHERS SEWER AND CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., Respondent.
Judges: Before Colleen Dolan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 530
Pages: 632–633

Head Matter:
LACLEDE GAS COMPANY, Appellant, v. DIZDAR BROTHERS SEWER AND CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., Respondent.
No. ED 104786
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
Filed: October 17, 2017
Christopher K. Durso, 211 N. Broadway Ste. 2500, St. Louis, MO 63102, For Plaintiff/Appellant.
James P. Halloran, Justin D. Guerra, 2000 South Eighth St., St. Louis, MO 63104, For Defendant/Respondent.
Before Colleen Dolan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Laclede Gas Company ("Laclede") appeals the trial court's judgment awarding Dizdar Brothers Sewer and Construction Co., Inc. ("Dizdar Bros.") $14,897.50 in damages. Laclede offers two points on appeal. In Point I, Laclede argues that the trial court erred in concluding that Lac-lede had a duty to install and maintain its gas line in a reasonable and responsible manner and, if it did have that duty, erred in finding the duty was breached. In Point II, Laclede claims the trial court erred in admitting the time cards created by Diz-dar Bros, into evidence, as they were inadmissible hearsay. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).