Case Name: In the Matter of Joey Alan Jennings, a child. STATE ex rel CHILDREN'S SERVICES DIVISION, Respondent, v. JENNINGS, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1982-10-20
Citations: 59 Or. App. 767
Docket Number: No. 79-063, CA A23299
Parties: In the Matter of Joey Alan Jennings, a child. STATE ex rel CHILDREN’S SERVICES DIVISION, Respondent, v. JENNINGS, Appellant.
Judges: Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Young, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 59
Pages: 767–768

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted September 15,
affirmed October 20, 1982
In the Matter of Joey Alan Jennings, a child. STATE ex rel CHILDREN’S SERVICES DIVISION, Respondent, v. JENNINGS, Appellant.
(No. 79-063, CA A23299)
652 P2d 381
John Halpern, Jr., Eugene, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.
Daryl Dodson Wilson, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief was Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, Stanton F. Long, Deputy Attorney General, and William F. Gary, Solicitor General, Salem.
Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Young, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Father appeals from an order terminating his parental rights to his child under ORS 419.523(2) and (3). On the basis of oür de novo review of the record, we are convinced by clear and convincing evidence that the father failed without cause to provide for the needs of his child for the one year period preceeding the filing of the termination petition, ORS 419.523(3). See State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. Farrell, 58 Or App 258, 648 P2d 401, rev den 293 Or 521 (1982).
Affirmed.