Case Name: Rose Marie HALL, as Guardian and next friend of Lisa Marie Hall, and Rose Marie Hall, individually, Appellants, v. CITY OF HIALEAH, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-11-21
Citations: 551 So. 2d 1281
Docket Number: No. 89-1555
Parties: Rose Marie HALL, as Guardian and next friend of Lisa Marie Hall, and Rose Marie Hall, individually, Appellants, v. CITY OF HIALEAH, Appellee.
Judges: Before BASKIN, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 551
Pages: 1281–1281

Head Matter:
Rose Marie HALL, as Guardian and next friend of Lisa Marie Hall, and Rose Marie Hall, individually, Appellants, v. CITY OF HIALEAH, Appellee.
No. 89-1555.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 21, 1989.
Klein & Tannen and Alan D. Sackrin, North Miami Beach, for appellants.
Walton, Lantaff, Schroeder & Carson and Robert L. Teitler, Miami, for appellee.
Before BASKIN, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellee has conceded error in the trial court's failure to grant a motion for new trial as to past and future non-economic damages. Finding that the trial court erred, Stevens v. Mount Vernon Fire Ins. Co., 395 So.2d 1206 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Pickel v. Rosen, 214 So.2d 730 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968); Goff v. 392208 Ontario, Ltd., 539 So.2d 1158 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); see also Horowitz v. Florida Ins. Guar. Assoc., 544 So.2d 281 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Gonzalez v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp., 463 So.2d 1229 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Skelly v. Hartford Casualty Ins. Co., 445 So.2d 415 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984), we reverse and remand for a new trial on the issue of past and future non-economic damages.