Case Name: LEWIS v. HEYDENREICH
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1899-03-24
Citations: 56 N.Y.S. 1014
Docket Number: 
Parties: LEWIS v. HEYDENREICH.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 56
Pages: 1014–1015

Head Matter:
LEWIS v. HEYDENREICH.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
March 24, 1899.)
Appeal—Review—Decision on Conelicting Evidence.
A decision on conflicting evidence, which seems to do substantial Justice, will not be disturbed.
Appeal from municipal court, borough of Manhattan, First district. Action by Frederick K. Lewis against Rudolph Heydenreich. There, was judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.
Affirmed.
Argued before FREEDMAN, P. J., and MacLEAN and LEVEN-TRITT, JJ.
Ludvigh & Ryttenberg, for appellant.
Henry E. Frankenberg, for respondent.

Opinion:
FREEDMAN, P. J.
The case presents a sharp conflict of testimony, and, in determining such conflict in the manner he did, the trial judge seems to have done substantial justice. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
Judgment affirmed, with costs. .
LEVENTRITT, J., concurs.