Case Name: Brandon Purvis DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2016-04-12
Citations: 187 So. 3d 1284
Docket Number: No. 1D15-1463
Parties: Brandon Purvis DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: WETHERELL, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 187
Pages: 1284–1284

Head Matter:
Brandon Purvis DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D15-1463.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
April 12, 2016.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, for Appellant.
Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorney General, Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Brandon Purvis Davis, Appellant, challenges the lower court's judgment revoking his probation and sentencing him to 36 months in prison. He argues that the trial court erred by adjudicating him guilty without a plea colloquy.
"Due process requires a court accepting a guilty plea to carefully inquire into the defendant's understanding of the plea, so that the record contains an affirmative showing that the plea was intelligent and voluntary." Koenig v. State, 597 So.2d 256, 258 (Fla.1992). All parties believed that Mr. Davis had admitted to violating his probation in open court. The trial court, as a result, skipped the plea colloquy before revoking his probation and sentencing him. But the State properly concedes, and the record reflects, that Mr. Davis made no admission, and was not informed of the consequences. The lower court thereby violated Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.172(c). See Haug v. State, 151 So.3d 560, 561 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014).
Accordingly, we REVERSE and REMAND with instructions to conduct a plea colloquy before entering a judgment and sentence.
WETHERELL, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.