Case Name: ADRIAN D. KING v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1998-02-17
Citations: 47 Conn. App. 715
Docket Number: AC 16754
Parties: ADRIAN D. KING v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Appellate Reports
Volume: 47
Pages: 715–716

Head Matter:
ADRIAN D. KING v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION
(AC 16754)
Landau, Schaller and Hennessy, Js.
Argued January 23
officially released February 17, 1998
Michael A. Rubino, Jr., special public defender, for the appellant (petitioner).
Ellen A. Jawitz, deputy assistant state’s attorney, with whom, on the brief, were Michael Dearington, state’s attorney, and Christopher Alexy, assistant state’s attorney, for the appellee (respondent).

Opinion:
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
After a thorough review of the record and briefs, we conclude that the petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing that he has been denied a state or federal constitutional right and, further, has failed to sustain his burden of persuasion that the denial of certification to appeal the dismissal of his habeas corpus petition was a clear abuse of discretion or that an injustice has been done. See Simms v. Warden, 230 Conn. 608, 612, 646 A.2d 126 (1994); Simms v. Warden, 229 Conn. 178, 189, 640 A.2d 601 (1994); Walker v. Commissioner of Correction, 38 Conn. App. 99, 100, 659 A.2d 195, cert. denied, 234 Conn. 920, 661 A.2d 100 (1995); see also Lozada v. Deeds, 498 U.S. 430, 431-32, 111 S. Ct. 860, 112 L. Ed. 2d 956 (1991).
The appeal is dismissed.