Case Name: Vernon Samuel BROWN, a/k/a Vernon S. Brown, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Correctional Officer Danny DUNBAR; Sgt. Angla Collins, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-01-12
Citations: 407 F. App'x 662
Docket Number: No. 10-6723
Parties: Vernon Samuel BROWN, a/k/a Vernon S. Brown, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Correctional Officer Danny DUNBAR; Sgt. Angla Collins, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 407
Pages: 662–663

Head Matter:
Vernon Samuel BROWN, a/k/a Vernon S. Brown, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Correctional Officer Danny DUNBAR; Sgt. Angla Collins, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 10-6723.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 22, 2010.
Decided: Jan. 12, 2011.
Vernon Samuel Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Hodges Waldron, Jr., Griffith & Sadler, P.A., Beaufort, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Vernon Samuel Brown appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1)(B) (West 2006 & Supp.2010). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Brown that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation.
The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge's recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir.1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 106 S.Ct. 466, 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985). Brown has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
We deny as moot appellees' motion to dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.