Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Jeffery CRAWFORD, Defendant/Appellant; Jeffery CRAWFORD, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1993-10-12
Citations: 865 S.W.2d 794
Docket Number: Nos. 61068, 63360
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Jeffery CRAWFORD, Defendant/Appellant. Jeffery CRAWFORD, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 865
Pages: 794–794

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Jeffery CRAWFORD, Defendant/Appellant. Jeffery CRAWFORD, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Nos. 61068, 63360.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Oct. 12, 1993.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 10, 1993.
Application to Transfer Denied Dec. 21, 1993.
Henry B. Robertson, St. Louis, for defen-danVappellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff/respondent.
Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of two counts of unlawful use of a weapon, § 571.030.1(1), RSMo 1986, and one count of possession of a controlled substance, § 195.-020, RSMo Supp.1992. He also appeals the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no prece-dential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).