Case Name: In re: Peter D. BOGART, Debtor. Peter D. Bogart, Appellant, v. California Coastal Commission; et al., Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-03-18
Citations: 31 F. App'x 514
Docket Number: No. 00-35992; BAP Nos. OR-99-1691-KMaB OR-00-1367-KMaB OR-00-1382-KMaB
Parties: In re: Peter D. BOGART, Debtor. Peter D. Bogart, Appellant, v. California Coastal Commission; et al., Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 31
Pages: 514–514

Head Matter:
In re: Peter D. BOGART, Debtor. Peter D. Bogart, Appellant, v. California Coastal Commission; et al., Appellees.
No. 00-35992. BAP Nos. OR-99-1691-KMaB OR-00-1367-KMaB OR-00-1382-KMaB.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 11, 2002 .
Decided March 18, 2002.
Before CANBY, BEEZER and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Because this panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument, we deny Bogart’s request for oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Peter D. Bogart appeals pro se the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's order dismissing for lack of jurisdiction Bogart's appeals of the bankruptcy court's interlocutory orders. We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Allen v. Old Nat'l Bank (In re Allen), 896 F.2d 416, 418 (9th Cir.1990) (per curiam).
We grant Bogart's motion to file a late reply brief. The Clerk shall file the reply brief received on December 28, 2001.
All other pending motions are denied as moot.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate -for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.