Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Peter Ferguson, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1993-02-23
Citations: 190 A.D.2d 610
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Peter Ferguson, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 190
Pages: 610–611

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Peter Ferguson, Appellant.

Opinion:
— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Budd G. Goodman, J.), rendered December 19, 1989, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the third degree and three counts of grand larceny in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 3 Vi to 7 years on the robbery count, and 2 Vi to 5 years on each of the grand larceny counts, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant's direct testimony that he had pleaded guilty in previous cases because he was, in fact, guilty was clearly meant to elicit a jury inference that defendant's failure to plead guilty in the instant case was some proof of innocence, thereby opening the door to cross-examination of defendant regarding his motivation for a prior guilty plea (People v Garcia, 169 AD2d 358, 362-363, lv denied 79 NY2d 857). While defendant's direct testimony did not open the door to cross-examination regarding any plea offer made in the instant case (supra), defendant's affirmative use of that issue on redirect examination, and the overwhelming nature of the evidence of defendant's guilt, precludes a finding of any prejudice to defendant that could have affected the outcome of the trial (People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach and Ross, JJ.