Case Name: Lucy E. Blake et al., Appellants, v. Frederick Gerken, Respondent
Court: New York City Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1901-05
Citations: 34 Misc. 830
Docket Number: 
Parties: Lucy E. Blake et al., Appellants, v. Frederick Gerken, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 34
Pages: 830–830

Head Matter:
Lucy E. Blake et al., Appellants, v. Frederick Gerken, Respondent.
Appeal from a judgment dismissing the plaintiffs’ complaint.
Hardy & Shellabarger (Charles o. Hardy, of counsel), for appellants.
H. Aplington (J. A. Stitt, of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We think the trial justice erred in his dismissal of the complaint. The undisputed evidence was that work was done and materials furnished, for which plaintiffs were entitled to at least nominal compensation. This judgment must be reversed and a new trial ordered, with .costs to appellants to abide event of action.
Present: Eitzsimows, Oh. J., Hascall and O'Dwyer, JJ.
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide event.