Case Name: THE STATE, ARCHIBALD GRACIE KING ET AL., PROSECUTORS, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. ABRAM W. DURYEE ET AL., DEFENDANTS IN ERROR; THE STATE, EDWARD KING ET AL., PROSECUTORS, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. ABRAM W. DURYEE ET AL., DEFENDANTS IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1886-03
Citations: 48 N.J.L. 372
Docket Number: 
Parties: THE STATE, ARCHIBALD GRACIE KING ET AL., PROSECUTORS, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. ABRAM W. DURYEE ET AL., DEFENDANTS IN ERROR. THE STATE, EDWARD KING ET AL., PROSECUTORS, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. ABRAM W. DURYEE ET AL., DEFENDANTS IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 48
Pages: 372–373

Head Matter:
THE STATE, ARCHIBALD GRACIE KING ET AL., PROSECUTORS, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. ABRAM W. DURYEE ET AL., DEFENDANTS IN ERROR. THE STATE, EDWARD KING ET AL., PROSECUTORS, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. ABRAM W. DURYEE ET AL., DEFENDANTS IN ERROR.
On error to the Supreme Court.
For the plaintiffs in error, Vredenburgh & Garretson and II. G. Pitney.
For the defendants in error, Abel I. Smith.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment of the Supreme Court should be reversed.
For affirmance—Hone.
For reversal—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Dixon, Knapp, Van Syckel, Brown, Clement, Cole, Paterson, Whitaker. 10.