Case Name: Christopher MORRISON, Petitioner, v. Eleonora Bianca ROOS, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2006-11-30
Citations: 944 So. 2d 341
Docket Number: No. SC05-2170
Parties: Christopher MORRISON, Petitioner, v. Eleonora Bianca ROOS, Respondent.
Judges: LEWIS, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 944
Pages: 341–342

Head Matter:
Christopher MORRISON, Petitioner, v. Eleonora Bianca ROOS, Respondent.
No. SC05-2170.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Nov. 30, 2006.
Elizabeth K. Russo and Jonathan L. Gaines of Russo Appellate Firm, P.A., Miami, FL, and J. Stephen O’Hara, Jr. of O’Hara Spradley, P.A., Jacksonville, FL, for Petitioner.
Thomas E. Duffy, Jr. of Terrell, Hogan, Ellis and Yegelwel, P.A., Jacksonville, FL, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision in Roos v. Morrison, 913 So.2d 59 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005), based on a question certified by the First District Court of Appeal to be of great public importance. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.
Upon further consideration, we have determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction of this cause. Accordingly, this review proceeding is hereby dismissed.
It is so ordered.
LEWIS, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.