Case Name: Ronald ROGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James R. VANCAMP; J. Kirk Osborn; Amos G. Tyndall; Michael E. Beale, Judge; Staples Hughes, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-07-21
Citations: 102 F. App'x 803
Docket Number: No. 04-6436
Parties: Ronald ROGERS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. James R. VANCAMP; J. Kirk Osborn; Amos G. Tyndall; Michael E. Beale, Judge; Staples Hughes, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 102
Pages: 803–804

Head Matter:
Ronald ROGERS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. James R. VANCAMP; J. Kirk Osborn; Amos G. Tyndall; Michael E. Beale, Judge; Staples Hughes, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 04-6436.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 15, 2004.
Decided: July 21, 2004.
Ronald Rogers, Appellant pro se.
Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Ronald Rogers appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Rogers v. Vancamp, No. CA-03-1111-1 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 5, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED