Case Name: CITY OF HAYS, KANSAS, Petitioner v. Matthew Jack Dwight VOGT.
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-05-29
Citations: 138 S. Ct. 1683
Docket Number: No. 16–1495.
Parties: CITY OF HAYS, KANSAS, Petitioner
v.
Matthew Jack Dwight VOGT.
Judges: 
Reporter: Supreme Court Reporter
Volume: 138
Pages: 1683–1684

Head Matter:
CITY OF HAYS, KANSAS, Petitioner
v.
Matthew Jack Dwight VOGT.
No. 16-1495.
Supreme Court of the United States
May 29, 2018.
David R. Cooper, Lauren Laushman, Fisher, Patterson, Sayler & Smith LLP, Topeka, KS, John T. Bird, City Attorney, Glassman, Bird, Brown, & Powell LLP, Hays, KS, Toby J. Heytens, Daniel R. Ortiz, University of Virginia, School of Law, Supreme Court Litigation Clinic, Charlottesville, VA, for Petitioner.
Morgan L. Roach, McCauley & Roach, LLC, Kansas City, MO, Kelsi Brown Corkran, Thomas M. Bondy, Benjamin Chagnon, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Washington, DC, E. Joshua Rosenkranz, Daniel A. Rubens, Alison M. Kilmartin, Haley Jankowski, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, New York, NY, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
It is so ordered.
Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.