Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. George KYLES, Defendant/Appellant; George KYLES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1993-12-21
Citations: 867 S.W.2d 674
Docket Number: Nos. 61570, 63584
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. George KYLES, Defendant/Appellant. George KYLES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANDALL, C.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 867
Pages: 674–675

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. George KYLES, Defendant/Appellant. George KYLES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Nos. 61570, 63584.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Dec. 21, 1993.
S. Paige Canfield, St. Louis, for defendant/appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Becky 0. Kilpatrick, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff/respondent.
Before CRANDALL, C.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals his conviction, by a jury, of possession of a controlled substance, heroin, in violation of § 195.202, RSMo Supp. 1992. He was sentenced by the court as a prior and persistent offender to a seven year prison term. He also appeals the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.
We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. A written opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. Rule 30.25(b); Rule 84.16(b).