Case Name: Elizabeth WEBER, Claimant/Appellant, v. IBT, INC., Employer/Respondent, and Virginia Surety Co., Inc., Insurer/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2007-12-11
Citations: 240 S.W.3d 202
Docket Number: No. ED 89683
Parties: Elizabeth WEBER, Claimant/Appellant, v. IBT, INC., Employer/Respondent, and Virginia Surety Co., Inc., Insurer/Respondent.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 240
Pages: 202–203

Head Matter:
Elizabeth WEBER, Claimant/Appellant, v. IBT, INC., Employer/Respondent, and Virginia Surety Co., Inc., Insurer/Respondent.
No. ED 89683.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Dec. 11, 2007.
Charles W. Bobinette, Uthoff, Graeber, Bobinette & Blanke, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Todd L. Beekley, Archer, Lassa & McHugh, L.L.C., St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Claimant appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the award of the Administrative Law Judge. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. No error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished, for their information only, with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our order affirm- mg the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).