Case Name: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. King
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1993-09-08
Citations: 67 Ohio St. 3d 236
Docket Number: No. 93-867
Parties: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. King.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 67
Pages: 236–237

Head Matter:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. King.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. King (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 236.]
(No. 93-867
Submitted June 15, 1993
Decided September 8, 1993.)
J. Warren Bettis, Disciplinary Counsel, and Sally Ann Steuk, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.
James Draper, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We adopt the findings of fact and recommendations of the board. Respondent, Barry King, is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.