Case Name: Larry MEINSTEIN, June Meinstein, Parman Florida, Inc., and Protean Investors, Inc., Appellants, v. TRAVEL ETC., INC., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1983-12-20
Citations: 442 So. 2d 1085
Docket Number: No. 83-1770
Parties: Larry MEINSTEIN, June Meinstein, Parman Florida, Inc., and Protean Investors, Inc., Appellants, v. TRAVEL ETC., INC., Appellee.
Judges: Before HENDRY, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 442
Pages: 1085–1085

Head Matter:
Larry MEINSTEIN, June Meinstein, Parman Florida, Inc., and Protean Investors, Inc., Appellants, v. TRAVEL ETC., INC., Appellee.
No. 83-1770.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 20, 1983.
Abrams, Anton, Robbins, Resnick, Schneider & Mager, and Joseph J. Huss and Jack F. Weins, Hollywood, for appellants.
Wilber G. Silverman, Hollywood, for ap-pellee.
Before HENDRY, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.

Opinion:
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of appellee's Motion for Rehearing, we withdraw the opinion of November 1, 1983, and substitute the following opinion.
We reverse the trial court's order permitting appellee to hold over as tenant until sixty days after determination of the action upon a holding that the order appealed provided injunctive relief, see Florida Jurisprudence, Injunctions, section 32 (1981) and cases cited therein, requiring the trial court to apply Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610. While the equitable remedy is proper in this case, see Shaw Brothers Oil Co. v. Parrish, 99 So.2d 610 (Fla.1958); Knight v. Global Contact Lens, 220 So.2d 693 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969); 43A C.J.S. Injunctions § 66 (1978), we reverse because the trial court failed to require the posting of bond, Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610(c), and because the order fails to specify the court's reasons for entering the order, Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610(a).
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.