Case Name: Solomon Greenwald, Appellant, v. The State Bank, Defendant, and Adalbert Phillippi, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1924-12-12
Citations: 124 Misc. 176
Docket Number: 
Parties: Solomon Greenwald, Appellant, v. The State Bank, Defendant, and Adalbert Phillippi, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 124
Pages: 176–177

Head Matter:
Solomon Greenwald, Appellant, v. The State Bank, Defendant, and Adalbert Phillippi, Respondent.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
December 12, 1924.
Banks and banking — action against drawee bank to recover amount of check paid on forged indorsement — payee whose indorsement was forged cannot be interpleaded in place of bank.
In an action to recover the amount of a check paid by the drawee bank on a forged indorsement of payee’s name, the payee cannot be interpleaded in the ■ place and stead of the bank.
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the City Court of the City of New York granting the motion of defendant The State Bank for interpleader on reargument.
Reuben Dorfman, for the appellant.
Max Silverstein [A. Rickman of counsel], for The State Bank.
Pitkin & Rosensohn [Samuel D. Smoleff of counsel], for Adalbert Phillippi.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
It was error to grant the motion of the defendant State Bank to interplead the respondent Adalbert Phillippi in place and stead of the said bank. The plaintiff delivered to the agent of the said Phillippi sought to be interpleaded a check. The agent forged the indorsement of his principal, the payee of the check, secured its payment upon such forged indorsement and absconded with the money. The bank violated its obligation to the maker to pay the check only to the payee. For such violation it becomes indebted to the plaintiff for the amount which it improperly paid upon the forged indorsement. Since, under the facts presented in this case, Phillippi has no claim against the State Bank for the improper payment of the check, he is not interested in the instant litigation and should not have been interpleaded.
Order is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
All concur; present, Bijur, Wagner and Levy, JJ.