Case Name: William Burdge, by next friend, complainant-appellant, v. J. Mortimer Johnson et al., defendants-respondents
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1915-06-14
Citations: 84 N.J. Eq. 500
Docket Number: 
Parties: William Burdge, by next friend, complainant-appellant, v. J. Mortimer Johnson et al., defendants-respondents.
Judges: For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Vredenburgh, White, Terhune, Williams — 12.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 84
Pages: 500–500

Head Matter:
William Burdge, by next friend, complainant-appellant, v. J. Mortimer Johnson et al., defendants-respondents.
[Argued March 17th, 1915.
Decided June 14th, 1915.]
On appeal from two orders of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Griffin, one directing the revival of the suit, and the other refusing to strike out defendants’ cross-bill.
Mr. William J. Leonard, for the appellant.
Mr. John E. Foster, for the respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Our consideration of this case leads us to the conclusion that both the order reviving the suit, and the order refusing to strike out defendants' cross-bill, were justified by the facts appearing in the cause; and that therefore each of them should be affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Vredenburgh, White, Terhune, Williams — 12.
For reversal — None.