Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Lonnie BOURISAW, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-03-07
Citations: 16 S.W.3d 679
Docket Number: No. ED 75489
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Lonnie BOURISAW, Appellant.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., and ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 16
Pages: 679–680

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Lonnie BOURISAW, Appellant.
No. ED 75489.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
March 7, 2000.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 11, 2000.
Application for Transfer Denied May 30, 2000.
Kent Denzel, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Stacy L. Anderson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., and ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Lonnie Bourisaw (Bourisaw) appeals from the judgment upon his conviction by a jury of seven counts of forcible sodomy, Section 566.060, RSMo Cum.Supp.1998, for which he was sentenced to seven consecutive terms of life in prison. Bourisaw claims the trial court erred when it (1) overruled Bourisaw's objections and allowed Bourisaw to be cross-examined as to whether he had been committed to a juvenile facility for alleged prior acts of child molestation; (2) accepted the jury's verdict because the State failed to prove an element of the crime, forcible compulsion, beyond a reasonable doubt; (3) ordered life sentences to be served consecutively; (4) refused an instruction on a lesser included offense; and (5) permitted the State to cross-examine Bourisaw with previously undisclosed evidence. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file and the transcript. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).