Case Name: In re: EMPIRE OF CAROLINA, INC. and Empire Industries, Inc., Debtors. Alpha International, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Toys "R" Us, Inc., Moose Mountain Toymakers, Limited, Moose Mountain Marketing, Inc., Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-07-28
Citations: 140 F. App'x 918
Docket Number: Nos. 04-16476, 04-16477, 04-16478; D.C. Docket Nos. 04-80230-CV-KLR, 04-80633-CV-KLR, 03-80960-CV-KLR & 00-35179-BKC-PG
Parties: In re: EMPIRE OF CAROLINA, INC. and Empire Industries, Inc., Debtors. Alpha International, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Toys “R” Us, Inc., Moose Mountain Toymakers, Limited, Moose Mountain Marketing, Inc., Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: Before BLACK, PRYOR and COX, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 140
Pages: 918–918

Head Matter:
In re: EMPIRE OF CAROLINA, INC. and Empire Industries, Inc., Debtors. Alpha International, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Toys “R” Us, Inc., Moose Mountain Toymakers, Limited, Moose Mountain Marketing, Inc., Defendants-Appellants.
Nos. 04-16476, 04-16477, 04-16478.
D.C. Docket Nos. 04-80230-CV-KLR, 04-80633-CV-KLR, 03-80960-CV-KLR & 00-35179-BKC-PG.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
July 28, 2005.
Drew Michael Dillworth, Miami, FL, for Moose Mountain Marketing, Inc., and Toys “R” US, Inc.
Ned R. Nashban, Daniel Benjamin Rosenthal, Quarles & Brady LLP, Boca Ra-ton, FL, Benjamin R. Norris, Quarles & Brady Streich Lang LLP, Phoenix, AZ, for Alpha International, Inc.
Before BLACK, PRYOR and COX, Circuit Judges.
Non-Argument Calendar

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Toys "R" Us, Inc., Moose Mountain Toy-makers, Ltd., and Moose Mountain Marketing, Inc. ("Moose Mountain") appeal the order of the district court affirming the judgment of the bankruptcy court in three related appeals (that we have consolidated) on the ground that the bankruptcy court erred in dismissing their counterclaim and cross-claim for lack of standing to challenge the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement. Because we agree with the district court that Moose Mountain lacked standing to challenge the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement in the adversary proceeding before the bankruptcy court, see In Re Westwood Cmty. Two Ass'n, 293 F.3d 1332, 1334-35 (11th Cir. 2002), the order affirming the judgment of the bankruptcy court is,
AFFIRMED.