Case Name: Mykal J. COBURN, Defendant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-04-25
Citations: 16 S.W.3d 728
Docket Number: No. ED 76714
Parties: Mykal J. COBURN, Defendant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before: RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 16
Pages: 728–728

Head Matter:
Mykal J. COBURN, Defendant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 76714.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
April 25, 2000.
Burton H. Shostak, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Krista D. Boston, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before: RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant Mykal Coburn appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief after an evi-dentiary hearing.
The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm, the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).