Case Name: Antonio Durrell PRESSLEY, Petitioner, v. Harry K. SINGLETARY, etc., et al., Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1997-12-30
Citations: 724 So. 2d 97
Docket Number: No. 90694
Parties: Antonio Durrell PRESSLEY, Petitioner, v. Harry K. SINGLETARY, etc., et al., Respondents.
Judges: KOGAN, C.J., OVERTON, SHAW, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., and GRIMES, Senior Justice, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 724
Pages: 97–98

Head Matter:
Antonio Durrell PRESSLEY, Petitioner, v. Harry K. SINGLETARY, etc., et al., Respondents.
No. 90694.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Dec. 30, 1997.
Order On Rehearing June 4, 1998.

Opinion:
AMENDED ORDER
Petitioner seeks a writ of habeas corpus asserting that the respondents have erroneously calculated his release date under section 947.1405 by using a non-qualified offense in the calculation. We recently addressed this issue in Parole Commission v. Cooper, 701 So.2d 543 (Fla.1997), in which we answered the following certified question in the negative.
WHEN AN INMATE WHO IS SERVING CONCURRENT SENTENCES IS RELEASED AFTER ACCRUING SUFFICIENT GAIN TIME AND HIS RELEASE ON ONE OR MORE OF THOSE SENTENCES IS CONDITIONAL UNDER SECTION 947.1405, FLORIDA STATUTES, IS HIS RELEASE STATUS REVOKED AS TO ALL THE CONCURRENT SENTENCES, INCLUDING THE SENTENCES IMPOSED FOR OFFENSES THAT DID NOT QUALIFY FOR CONDITIONAL RELEASE?
We hereby grant the petition insofar as the relief requested is warranted pursuant to our opinion in Cooper. Because we trust that the respondents will fully comply with the dictates of this order and our opinion in Cooper, we withhold issuance of the writ. Any alternative relief sought in the petition is hereby denied.
It is so ordered.
KOGAN, C.J., OVERTON, SHAW, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., and GRIMES, Senior Justice, concur.