Case Name: The State, ex rel. Binford et al., v. Lash, Aud.
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1929-01-16
Citations: 119 Ohio St. 656
Docket Number: No. 21389
Parties: The State, ex rel. Binford et al., v. Lash, Aud.
Judges: Marshall, C. J., Robinson, Jones and Allen, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, New Service
Volume: 119
Pages: 656–657

Head Matter:
The State, ex rel. Binford et al., v. Lash, Aud.
(No. 21389
Decided January 16, 1929.)
Messrs. Hemperly, Wiggins & Heggem and Mr. Franklin L. Maier, for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. Ammerman & Mills and Mr. M. W. Wend-ling, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.
Petition in error dismissed.
Marshall, C. J., Robinson, Jones and Allen, JJ., concur.
Kinkade, J., not participating.