Case Name: CROUNSE CORPORATION, et al., Petitioners, v. The INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION and the United States of America, Respondents
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1986-03-28
Citations: 787 F.2d 1031
Docket Number: Nos. 84-3743 to 84-3753, 84-3842 and 84-3868
Parties: CROUNSE CORPORATION, et al., Petitioners, v. The INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION and the United States of America, Respondents.
Judges: Before LIVELY, Chief Judge, and EN-GEL, KEITH, MERRITT, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, CONTIE, KRUPANSKY, WELLFORD, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON and RYAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 787
Pages: 1031–1032

Head Matter:
CROUNSE CORPORATION, et al., Petitioners, v. The INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION and the United States of America, Respondents.
Nos. 84-3743 to 84-3753, 84-3842 and 84-3868.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
March 28, 1986.
Dissenting Opinions April 11, 1986.
Before LIVELY, Chief Judge, and EN-GEL, KEITH, MERRITT, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, CONTIE, KRUPANSKY, WELLFORD, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON and RYAN, Circuit Judges.
Chief Judge Lively and Circuit Judge Wellford recused themselves from participation in this case.

Opinion:
ORDER
The Court having received a petition for rehearing en banc, and the petition having been circulated not only to the original panel members but also to all other active judges of this Court, and less than a majority of the judges having favored the suggestion, the petition for rehearing has been referred to the original hearing panel.
The panel has further reviewed the petition for rehearing and concludes that the issues raised in the petition were fully considered upon the original submission and decision of the case. Accordingly, the petition is denied.
MERRITT, Circuit Judge, dissents from denial of petition for rehearing en banc, in which KEITH, MARTIN and JONES, Circuit Judges, joined.
JONES, Circuit Judge, delivered a separate dissent.