Case Name: Brian David LEE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1998-06-09
Citations: 710 So. 2d 1050
Docket Number: No. 97-1515
Parties: Brian David LEE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: LAWRENCE and DAVIS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 710
Pages: 1050–1050

Head Matter:
Brian David LEE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 97-1515.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
June 9, 1998.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Glen P. Gifford, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Giselle Lylen Rivera, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
MICKLE, Judge.
Appellant challenges his convictions and sentences imposed following remand from an earlier appeal. While we do not find the prison and probationary terms imposed after appellant's successful appeal to be impermis-sibly harsher than the original sentences, we do conclude that the imposition of restitution for the first time on remand constituted a prohibited enhancement. Sqe Brooks v. State, 655 So.2d 238 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Jones v. State, 590 So.2d 1061 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Abt v. State, 581 So.2d 1001 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Morganti v. State, 573 So.2d 820 (Fla.1991). We therefore reverse the imposition of restitution and remand with instructions for the trial court to vacate that part of the sentence. In all other respects, the convictions and sentences are affirmed.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.
LAWRENCE and DAVIS, JJ., concur.