Case Name: ROSEVILLE INVESTMENT CORPORATION, RESPONDENT, v. SOLOMON GRUDIN, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1933-09-27
Citations: 111 N.J.L. 396
Docket Number: 
Parties: ROSEVILLE INVESTMENT CORPORATION, RESPONDENT, v. SOLOMON GRUDIN, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 111
Pages: 396–398

Head Matter:
ROSEVILLE INVESTMENT CORPORATION, RESPONDENT, v. SOLOMON GRUDIN, APPELLANT.
Argued May 17, 1933
Decided September 27, 1933.
For the appellant, Tumarlcin & Kasen (William B. Kasen, of counsel).
For the respondent, Philip Mandelbaum (Herman Marx, of counsel).

Opinion:
Pee Cueiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Judge Smith in the Circuit Court.
For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Chiee Justice, Teenchaed, Paekee, Case, Bodine, Donges, ECehee, Peeskie, Van Buskiek, Kays, Heteield, Deae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.