Case Name: P. Mark SHAFER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert HARTMAN, Acting Supervisor C & O Canal NPS; Lisa Mendelson-Ielmini, Deputy Regional Director- NPS Capital Region; John Doe, Acting Deputy Regional Director NPS; U.S. Government, Washington, DC, Defendants - Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-09-19
Citations: 294 F. App'x 60
Docket Number: No. 08-6553
Parties: P. Mark SHAFER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert HARTMAN, Acting Supervisor C & O Canal NPS; Lisa Mendelson-Ielmini, Deputy Regional Director— NPS Capital Region; John Doe, Acting Deputy Regional Director NPS; U.S. Government, Washington, DC, Defendants — Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 294
Pages: 60–60

Head Matter:
P. Mark SHAFER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert HARTMAN, Acting Supervisor C & O Canal NPS; Lisa Mendelson-Ielmini, Deputy Regional Director— NPS Capital Region; John Doe, Acting Deputy Regional Director NPS; U.S. Government, Washington, DC, Defendants — Appellees.
No. 08-6553.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 16, 2008.
Decided: Sept. 19, 2008.
P. Mark Shafer, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
P. Mark Shafer appeals the district court's order dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1985,1986 (2000), and Bivens v. Six Unknoum Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Shafer v. Hartman, No. 8:08-cv00577-PJM (D.Md. Mar. 31, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.