Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Terrell WILLIAMS, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-09-15
Citations: 976 S.W.2d 600
Docket Number: No. 73551
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Terrell WILLIAMS, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before JAMES R. DOWD, P.J., and CRAHAN and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 976
Pages: 600–601

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Terrell WILLIAMS, Defendant/Appellant.
No. 73551.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Sept. 15, 1998.
Ellen H. Flottman, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for defendanVappellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Karen L. Kramer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff/respondent.
Before JAMES R. DOWD, P.J., and CRAHAN and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant Terrell Williams appeals the judgment entered upon his conviction by a jury of second degree murder, in violation of section 565.021.1(2) RSMo 1994, and armed criminal action, in violation of section 571.015 RSMo 1994. Defendant contends that the trial court erred in overruling defense counsel's objection to the rebuttal testimony of the prosecutor's investigator in that the testi mony was inadmissible under Supreme Court Rule 24.02(d)(5). As defendant failed to include this error in his motion for new trial, review is for plain error.
We have examined the briefs and the record on appeal and find no manifest injustice. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would serve no precedential or jurisprudential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).