Case Name: Christian RODRIGUEZ, individually and a class representatives; Alberto Cazarez, individually and a class representatives, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES; Carmen Anthony Trutanich; Charles Beck; Allan Nadir; Angel Gomez, Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-01-17
Citations: 552 F. App'x 723
Docket Number: No. 13-55467
Parties: Christian RODRIGUEZ, individually and a class representatives; Alberto Cazarez, individually and a class representatives, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES; Carmen Anthony Trutanich; Charles Beck; Allan Nadir; Angel Gomez, Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: Before: McKEOWN, GOULD, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 552
Pages: 723–723

Head Matter:
Christian RODRIGUEZ, individually and a class representatives; Alberto Cazarez, individually and a class representatives, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES; Carmen Anthony Trutanich; Charles Beck; Allan Nadir; Angel Gomez, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 13-55467.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Nov. 4, 2013.
Filed Jan. 17, 2014.
Olu K. Orange, Esquire, Orange Law Offices, Los Angeles, CA, Cindy Panuco, Esquire, Anne Richardson, Dan Stormer, Hadsell Stormer Richardson & Renick, LLP, Pasadena, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Cory Michael Brente, Esquire, Gary G. Geuss, Esquire, Rena Shahandeh, Carmen A. Trutanich, Esquire, Timothy T, Coates, Marc J. Poster, Gary David Rowe, Greines Martin Stein & Richland, LLP, Los Ange-les, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: McKEOWN, GOULD, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
Based on the parties' submissions and supplemental briefing, we conclude that this appeal is now moot. See, e.g., Univ. of Texas v. Camenisch, 451 U.S. 390, 398, 101 S.Ct. 1830, 68 L.Ed.2d 175 (1981) (holding that "the question whether a preliminary injunction should have been issued . is moot . [where] the terms of the injunction . have been fully and irrevocably carried out."). The case is remanded to the district court for any further proceedings.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.