Case Name: James Edward LOWE, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doctor SHAH, Medical Officer; Doctor Guzman, Medical Officer; Doctor Allen, Clinical Director; Pa/Mlp Yirga, Physician Assistant; Pa/Mlp Hilletework, Physician Assistant; Pa/Mlp Osorio, Physician Assistant; Doctor Bhuller, Defendants-Appellees; and James M. Brooks, Warden; Harley Lap-pin, Regional Director Mid-Atlantic Region; Kathleen Hawk-Sawyer, Director, Defendants, v. United States of America, Party in Interest
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-07-01
Citations: 137 F. App'x 608
Docket Number: No. 05-6531
Parties: James Edward LOWE, III, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Doctor SHAH, Medical Officer; Doctor Guzman, Medical Officer; Doctor Allen, Clinical Director; Pa/Mlp Yirga, Physician Assistant; Pa/Mlp Hilletework, Physician Assistant; Pa/Mlp Osorio, Physician Assistant; Doctor Bhuller, Defendants—Appellees, and James M. Brooks, Warden; Harley Lap-pin, Regional Director Mid-Atlantic Region; Kathleen Hawk-Sawyer, Director, Defendants, v. United States of America, Party in Interest.
Judges: Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 137
Pages: 608–609

Head Matter:
James Edward LOWE, III, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Doctor SHAH, Medical Officer; Doctor Guzman, Medical Officer; Doctor Allen, Clinical Director; Pa/Mlp Yirga, Physician Assistant; Pa/Mlp Hilletework, Physician Assistant; Pa/Mlp Osorio, Physician Assistant; Doctor Bhuller, Defendants—Appellees, and James M. Brooks, Warden; Harley Lap-pin, Regional Director Mid-Atlantic Region; Kathleen Hawk-Sawyer, Director, Defendants, v. United States of America, Party in Interest.
No. 05-6531.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted June 23, 2005.
Decided July 1, 2005.
James Edward Lowe, III, Appellant pro se. Dennis Carl Barghaan, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c)

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
James Edward Lowe, III, appeals the district court's order denying relief on.his Bivens complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Lowe v. Shah, No. CA-03-1423-1 (E.D.Va. Mar. 4, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971).