Case Name: Donald Claython FULLER, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF ORANGE; et al., Defendants-Appellees. Michael Adame; et al., Intervenors-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-05-02
Citations: 276 F. App'x 686
Docket Number: No. 06-55617
Parties: Donald Claython FULLER, Jr., Plaintiff—Appellant, v. COUNTY OF ORANGE; et al., Defendants—Appellees. Michael Adame; et al., Intervenors—Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 276
Pages: 686–687

Head Matter:
Donald Claython FULLER, Jr., Plaintiff—Appellant, v. COUNTY OF ORANGE; et al., Defendants—Appellees. Michael Adame; et al., Intervenors—Appellants.
No. 06-55617.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Nov. 8, 2007.
Filed May 2, 2008.
Robert Mann, Esq., Mann & Cook, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
David D. Lawrence, Esq., Franscell Strickland, et al., Orange, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Robert L. Bastían, Jr., Esq., Bastían & Dini, Los Angeles, CA, Sonia M. Mercado, Culver City, CA, for Intervenors-Appellants.
Before: WARDLAW, BEA, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
In a separate memorandum disposition, we reversed in part the district court's grant of summary judgment for the Defendants in Fuller v. County of Orange, 06-55511. In light of that decision, we dismiss the appeal in Adame v. County of Orange, 06-55617, as moot, without prejudice to the Intervenors-Appellants renewing their motion for leave to intervene before the district court.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.