Case Name: William Goltz and John Brengard, Respondents, v. Art Awning Manufacturing Company, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1933-02
Citations: 238 A.D. 794
Docket Number: 
Parties: William Goltz and John Brengard, Respondents, v. Art Awning Manufacturing Company, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 238
Pages: 794–794

Head Matter:
William Goltz and John Brengard, Respondents, v. Art Awning Manufacturing Company, Appellant.
Affd., 262 N. Y. 627.

Opinion:
Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. The alleged error with respect to the charge is not adequately presented on this record. (Govers v. Hofstatter, 41 App. Div. 384.) It does not appear that the matter complained of prejudicially affected the result. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ.