Case Name: Christopher B. DURNIL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2013-04-02
Citations: 395 S.W.3d 77
Docket Number: No. WD 75003
Parties: Christopher B. DURNIL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before: KAREN KING MITCHELL, P.J., THOMAS H. NEWTON, and LISA WHITE HARDWICK, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 395
Pages: 77–78

Head Matter:
Christopher B. DURNIL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 75003.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
April 2, 2013.
Mark Grothoff, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.
Andrew Hooper, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before: KAREN KING MITCHELL, P.J., THOMAS H. NEWTON, and LISA WHITE HARDWICK, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Mr. Christopher B. Durnil appeals from the motion court's judgment denying a Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. He contends that trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to object to certain testimony by the victim.
For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).