Case Name: FARNSWORTH v. SONDELS et
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1930-05-27
Citations: 8 Ohio Law Abs. 459
Docket Number: No 1718
Parties: FARNSWORTH v SONDELS et
Judges: Funk, PJ, Pardee, J, and Washburn, J, concur.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 8
Pages: 459–459

Head Matter:
FARNSWORTH v SONDELS et
Ohio Appeals, 9th Dist, Summit Co
No 1718.
Decided May 27, 1930
Walter R. East, Akron, for Farnsworth.
S. A. Decker, Barberton, for Sondéis, et.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
After a careful consideration we have reached the conclusion that the circumstances' are not such as to estop the defendant from discontinuing the arrangement made for a joint driveway and using the part thereof which is upon his property for the purpose of constructing a separate driveway and using dll of his lot the same as if no joint driveway had existed.
Plaintiff's petition is therefore dismissed, at her costs.
Funk, PJ, Pardee, J, and Washburn, J, concur.