Case Name: Michael Andre WHITE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2001-12-26
Citations: 802 So. 2d 516
Docket Number: No. 3D01-1435
Parties: Michael Andre WHITE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before JORGENSON, LEVY, and SHEVIN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 802
Pages: 516–516

Head Matter:
Michael Andre WHITE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D01-1435.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 26, 2001.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Valerie Jonas and Carlos Gonzalez, Assistant Public Defenders, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Steven R. Berger, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before JORGENSON, LEVY, and SHEVIN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968) (holding that to effect an investigatory stop, a police officer need only have a founded suspicion that a person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime); Saturnino-Boudet v. State, 682 So.2d 188, 191 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (holding that founded suspicion needed to justify investigatory stop is fact specific to each case and based on totality of circumstances as viewed by an experienced police officer); Jones v. State, 758 So.2d 722, 722 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (holding that "under 'inevitable discovery' doctrine, evidence obtained as the result of an unlawful search is admissible if the evidence would ultimately have been discovered by legal means.").