Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Dwayne Malave, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2000-04-04
Citations: 271 A.D.2d 204
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dwayne Malave, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 271
Pages: 204–204

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dwayne Malave, Appellant.
[707 NYS2d 26]

Opinion:
—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Richard Price, J.), rendered March 21, 1995, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminal impersonation in the first degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 25 years to life and 5 to 15 years, consecutive to a term of lVs to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly exercised its discretion in declining to replace a sworn juror based on her innocuous encounter with an Assistant District Attorney having no connection to this prosecution, whom the juror recognized as a college friend. The juror had been unaware that her friend had joined the District Attorney's office, and assured the court that the encounter would not affect her impartiality (see, People v Provenzano, 50 NY2d 420; People v Rodriguez, 242 AD2d 475, lv denied 91 NY2d 879).
On the existing record, viewed in totality, we conclude that defendant received meaningful representation (see, People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 713-714; see also, People v Sullivan, 153 AD2d 223, lv denied 75 NY2d 925). There is no indication that counsel's style of trying the case prevented defendant from receiving a fair trial.
Defendant's claim under Brady v Maryland (373 US 83) is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would conclude that it rests on speculation (see, People v McKee, 269 AD2d 225; People v Parkinson, 268 AD2d 792; People v Serrando, 184 AD2d 1094, lv denied 80 NY2d 837).
We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion. Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Nardelli, Tom, Mazzarelli and Wallach, JJ.