Case Name: Pavia & Co. S. P. A., et al., Appellants, v. Siegel Chemical Co., Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Great Eastern Parking & Paper Stock Corporation, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1955-12-01
Citations: 1 A.D.2d 651
Docket Number: 
Parties: Pavia & Co. S. P. A., et al., Appellants, v. Siegel Chemical Co., Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Great Eastern Parking & Paper Stock Corporation, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 1
Pages: 651–651

Head Matter:
Pavia & Co. S. P. A., et al., Appellants, v. Siegel Chemical Co., Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Great Eastern Parking & Paper Stock Corporation, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

Opinion:
Motion denied. The parties should be able to stipulate to eliminate from the printed record on appeal such parts of the examinations as are not essential to the questions presented on the appeal. Costs and disbursements may be imposed upon respondents if the printed record on appeal is found to be needlessly extended. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Bastow, Botein and Rabin, JJ.