Case Name: Edgar SEARCY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patricia STANSBERRY, Warden, F.C.C. Petersburg, Virginia, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-10-05
Citations: 332 F. App'x 837
Docket Number: No. 09-6396
Parties: Edgar SEARCY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patricia STANSBERRY, Warden, F.C.C. Petersburg, Virginia, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 332
Pages: 837–837

Head Matter:
Edgar SEARCY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patricia STANSBERRY, Warden, F.C.C. Petersburg, Virginia, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 09-6396.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 29, 2009.
Decided: Oct. 5, 2009.
Edgar Searcy, Appellant Pro Se. Robert P. McIntosh, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appel-lee.
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Edgar Searcy, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order denying relief without prejudice on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Searcy v. Stansberry, No. 3:08-cv-00050-REP, 2009 WL 424344 (E.D.Va. Feb. 19, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.