Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Owen ODMAN, a/k/a Star, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-12-27
Citations: 502 F. App'x 259
Docket Number: No. 12-7500
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Owen ODMAN, a/k/a Star, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 502
Pages: 259–259

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Owen ODMAN, a/k/a Star, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-7500.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 20, 2012.
Decided: Dec. 27, 2012.
Owen Odman, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Lee Edwards, Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorneys, Jill Westmoreland Rose, Office of the United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina; Adam Christopher Morris, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Owen Odman appeals the district court's order granting his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(e) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Odman, No. 4:96-cr-00053-MR-l (W.D.N.C. Aug. 13, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Although the district court granted Odman's § 3582 motion, the reduction granted by the court did not reduce Odman's sentence to the full extent he requested.