Case Name: Tonica RAWLS, Appellant, v. Edna Mae ROBERTS and Sun Bank/South Florida, National Association, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-12-06
Citations: 664 So. 2d 51
Docket Number: No. 94-2000
Parties: Tonica RAWLS, Appellant, v. Edna Mae ROBERTS and Sun Bank/South Florida, National Association, Appellees.
Judges: DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 664
Pages: 51–51

Head Matter:
Tonica RAWLS, Appellant, v. Edna Mae ROBERTS and Sun Bank/South Florida, National Association, Appellees.
No. 94-2000.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Dec. 6, 1995.
Blaise Picchi of Blaise Picchi, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
William C. Davell of Rogers, Morris & Ziegler, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.

Opinion:
STEVENSON, Judge.
Appellant, Tonica Rawls, challenges an order entered by the trial court granting appellee, Sun Bank, attorney's fees pursuant to Section 57.105(1), Florida Statutes (1993). We find that the record confirms the existence of a basis for such an award, however, the trial court's order is technically deficient in that it contains no specific finding regarding the complete absence of a justiciable issue in appellant's cause of action. Therefore, we reverse and remand for the trial court to correct its technically deficient order. See Peerless Elec. Co., Inc. v. Goldberger, 473 So.2d 300 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Fox v. Loejfler, 434 So.2d 2 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983).
DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.