Case Name: Scott JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1999-12-08
Citations: 779 So. 2d 329
Docket Number: No. 99-00351
Parties: Scott JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and WHATLEY and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 779
Pages: 329–330

Head Matter:
Scott JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 99-00351.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Dec. 8, 1999.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Timothy J. Ferreri, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ronald Napolitano, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Mr. Jones appeals the sentence imposed on his violation of probation. He claims that an unpreserved Karchesky error exists on his sentencing scoresheet. Such an error cannot be reviewed on direct appeal. See State v. Montague, 682 So.2d 1085 (Fla.1996). It is not apparent on the face of the record that a Karchesky error actually exists in this case. We cannot determine whether Mr. Jones' counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the scoresheet. Accordingly, we affirm without prejudice to Mr. Jones' right to file a timely motion for postconviction relief pur suant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.
Affirmed.
ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and WHATLEY and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.
. Karchesky v. State, 591 So.2d 930 (Fla. 1992).