Case Name: Beck Distributing Corp. v. United States
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1967-07-11
Citations: 59 Cust. Ct. 599
Docket Number: R.D. 11332
Parties: Beck Distributing Corp. v. United States
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Volume: 59
Pages: 599–600

Head Matter:
(R.D. 11332)
Beck Distributing Corp. v. United States
(Decided July 11, 1967)
Stein and, ShostaJe for the plaintiff.
Garl Mardley, Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Opinion:
Beckworth, Judge:
The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the schedule of cases, attached hereto and made a part hereof, are before me on the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court:
1. That the merchandise covered by the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Scheduled of Cases, consists of bat- teri.es, and that, at the time of exportation thereof to the United States, the market value or the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or, in the absence of sales, freely offered for safe to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the invoice unit values, net packed, less 50%.
2. That all the merchandise covered by the appeals for reappraisement was entered subsequent to February 27,1958.
3. That the merchandise the subject of the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule is not identified in the Final List published by the Secretary of the Treasury in T.D. 54521, pursuant to the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54721, effective February 27,1958.
4. That the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Cases may be deemed submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.
On the agreed facts I find and hold that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 70 Stat. 943, is the proper basis for the determination of value of the merchandise involved herein and that said value is represented by the invoice unit values net packed, less 50 percent.
Judgement will be entered accordingly.