Case Name: DURHAM v. SEYMOUR
Court: Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Decision Date: 1897
Citations: 10 App. D.C. 274
Docket Number: 
Parties: DURHAM v. SEYMOUR.
Judges: 
Reporter: Reports of Cases Adjudged in the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia
Volume: 10
Pages: 274–275

Head Matter:
DURHAM v. SEYMOUR.
Appellate Practice.
A motion for rehearing, made after a former motion for the same purpose had been denied, and the case appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States, in which court the appeal was dismissed for want of jurisdiction, dismissed as not having been made in time, under the rules, and also because the matter had been settled by the decision on the first motion.

Opinion:
On October 3, 1896, Mr. J. Nota McGill and Mr. Don M. Dickinson, on behalf of the appellant, filed a motion for a rehearing in this cause. (See opinion on the hearing in 6 App. D. C. 78.)
On January 4,1897, the motion was dismissed, Mr. Justice Shepard delivering the opinion of the Court:
The motion for rehearing in this case cannot be entertained, because it was not filed within the time prescribed by the rules of the court. Rule XXII. In fact, it is a second motion for the same purpose. The first motion was made May 27, 1895, after which the case was appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States, by which it was dismissed. 161 U. S. 235. Since then this motion has been filed. The matter must be regarded as settled by the action on the original motion.
Motion dismissed.