Case Name: HERTZ RENTAL COMPANY (Hertz-Rent-A-Car), Petitioner, v. Dorothy PITTS, and her husband, Janies E. Pitts, Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1966-03-09
Citations: 183 So. 2d 687
Docket Number: No. 34502
Parties: HERTZ RENTAL COMPANY (Hertz-Rent-A-Car), Petitioner, v. Dorothy PITTS, and her husband, Janies E. Pitts, Respondents.
Judges: THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, CALDWELL, ERVIN and HOBSON (Ret.), JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 183
Pages: 687–687

Head Matter:
HERTZ RENTAL COMPANY (Hertz-Rent-A-Car), Petitioner, v. Dorothy PITTS, and her husband, Janies E. Pitts, Respondents.
No. 34502.
Supreme Court of Florida.
March 9, 1966.
J. Donelson Jones of Jones & Jones, Panama City, for petitioner.
J. Ben Watkins, of Truett & Watkins, Tallahassee, Davenport, Johnston, Harris & Urquhart and Earl R. Duncan, Panama City, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have before us for our consideration and determination a petition for a writ of certiorari, directed to the District Court of Appeal, First District, predicated upon the theory of a conflict in decisions.
After having listened attentively to the arguments of counsel for the respective parties litigant, having studied the briefs filed herein and having carefully considered the opinion filed in this case by the District Court of Appeal, First District, (Hertz Rental Co. v. Pitts [Fla.App. 1st] 174 So.2d 437) in explanation and support of its decision, we have concluded that the petition for a writ of certiorari should be denied.
It is so ordered.
THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, CALDWELL, ERVIN and HOBSON (Ret.), JJ., concur.