Case Name: Sandra Jean Dale BOGGS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Thomas F. BOGGS, Harry M. Boggs and David B. Boggs, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1997-08-20
Citations: 121 F.3d 168
Docket Number: No. 94-30178
Parties: Sandra Jean Dale BOGGS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Thomas F. BOGGS, Harry M. Boggs and David B. Boggs, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WISDOM, KING and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 121
Pages: 168–168

Head Matter:
Sandra Jean Dale BOGGS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Thomas F. BOGGS, Harry M. Boggs and David B. Boggs, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 94-30178.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 20, 1997.
Marian M. Livaudais, Livaudais & Livaudais, Mandeville, LA, James F. Willeford, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Susan Rees, Plan Benefits Security Division, N-4611, Office of Solicitor, U.S. Dept, of Labor, Washington, DC, for Dept, of Labor, Amicus Curiae.
Thomas F. Boggs, Monroe, LA, Pro Se.
Guy L. Deano, Jr., Deano & Deano, Mandeville, LA, for Harry Boggs & David Boggs.
Before WISDOM, KING and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The district court's order granting summary judgment in the above-styled action is VACATED. The case is REMANDED to the district court for proceedings not inconsistent with the Supreme Court's pronouncement in Boggs v. Boggs, — U.S.-, 117 S.Ct. 1754, 138 L.Ed.2d 45 (1997).