Case Name: Rafael FERNANDEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SILVERSTONE INVESTMENTS, INC., Juan C. Martinez, Jean Marc-Rogliano, Elena Fraga, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-10-31
Citations: 203 F. App'x 291
Docket Number: Nos. 06-11352, 06-13188
Parties: Rafael FERNANDEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SILVERSTONE INVESTMENTS, INC., Juan C. Martinez, Jean Marc-Rogliano, Elena Fraga, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before TJOFLAT, BLACK and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 203
Pages: 291–291

Head Matter:
Rafael FERNANDEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SILVERSTONE INVESTMENTS, INC., Juan C. Martinez, Jean Marc-Rogliano, Elena Fraga, Defendants-Appellees.
Nos. 06-11352, 06-13188
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Oct. 31, 2006.
Jamie H. Zidell, J.H. Zidell, P.A., Miami Beach, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Robert M. Einhorn, Zarco & Pardo, P.A., Owei Z. Belleh, Bailey & Dawes, L.C., Miami, FL, for Defendants-Appel-lees.
Before TJOFLAT, BLACK and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The district court denied appellant's motion for judgment as a matter of law notwithstanding the jury's verdict and alternative motion for a new trial on the issue of damages. The court denied the motion for judgment as a matter of law because the evidence did not point so overwhelmingly in favor of the plaintiff that a reasonable jury could not return a verdict for the defendants. After reviewing the relevant portions of the trial transcript, we agree with the district court and thus affirm its ruling.
AFFIRMED.