Case Name: Wilson v. Haimerl
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2003-09-10
Citations: 99 Ohio St. 3d 1541
Docket Number: 2003-0896
Parties: Wilson v. Haimerl.
Judges: O’Connor, J., concurs but would also hold for the decision in 2002-1126 and 2002-1433, Allen v. Johnson, Wayne App. Nos. 01CA0046 and 01CA0047, 2002-0hio-3404.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 99
Pages: 1541–1541

Head Matter:
2003-0896.
Wilson v. Haimerl.

Opinion:
Madison App. No. CA2002-08-017, 2003-0hio-1774. Discretionary appeal allowed on Proposition of Law No. I.
O'Connor, J., concurs but would also hold for the decision in 2002-1126 and 2002-1433, Allen v. Johnson, Wayne App. Nos. 01CA0046 and 01CA0047, 2002-0hio-3404.
Moyer, C.J., concurs but would allow Proposition of Law No. I and hold for the decision in Allen; and would allow Proposition of Law No. II and hold for the decision in 2002-0932, Westfield Ins. Co. v. Galatis, Summit App. No. 20784, 2002-0hio-1502.
Lundberg Stratton and O'Donnell, JJ., concur but would allow all propositions of law without holding.
Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.