Case Name: Abdul LIGHTFOOT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2001-12-17
Citations: 801 So. 2d 313
Docket Number: No. 1D00-3308
Parties: Abdul LIGHTFOOT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: BARFIELD, VAN NORTWICK and POLSTON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 801
Pages: 313–313

Head Matter:
Abdul LIGHTFOOT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D00-3308.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Dec. 17, 2001.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and. Robert R. Wheeler, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the revocation of the appellant's probation because the trial court did not abuse its discretion. Bell v. State, 643 So.2d 674, 675 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). The appellant's remaining claims are without merit because the appellant accepted the benefits associated with his sentence. Huff v. State, 672 So.2d 634, 635 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)(holding that even though the appellant's original suspended sentence may have been improper, it was not reversible error because the appellant received the benefits of the improper sentence).
AFFIRMED.
BARFIELD, VAN NORTWICK and POLSTON, JJ., concur.