Case Name: Ernest C. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. LAW & SCHRIENER, LLC, et al., Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2017-06-13
Citations: 520 S.W.3d 518
Docket Number: No. ED 104927
Parties: Ernest C. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. LAW & SCHRIENER, LLC, et al., Respondents.
Judges: Before Philip M. Hess, C.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., Robin Fulton, Sp.J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 520
Pages: 518–519

Head Matter:
Ernest C. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. LAW & SCHRIENER, LLC, et al., Respondents.
No. ED 104927
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, SOUTHERN DIVISION.
Filed: June 13, 2017
FOR APPELLANT: Ernest C. Williams, #43551 (SD-171), South Central Correctional Center, 255 West Highway 32, Licking, Missouri 65542.
FOR RESPONDENT: Brent W. Baldwin, The Baldwin Law Group, 12747 Olive Boulevard, Suite 280, St. Louis, Missouri 63141.
Before Philip M. Hess, C.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., Robin Fulton, Sp.J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Ernest Williams (Appellant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis City dismissing his petition without prejudice for failure to state a claim. Appellant asserts that the trial court erred by dismissing his petition because he alleged sufficient facts to establish claims for legal malpractice, negligence, and constructive fraud. Finding no error, we affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and have determined that an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. Rule 84.16(b).