Case Name: John Ervin WILSON, Jr. a/k/a John Wilson, a/k/a John E. Wilson, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer Shamika BRODDY, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-11-05
Citations: 621 F. App'x 246
Docket Number: No. 15-6687
Parties: John Ervin WILSON, Jr. a/k/a John Wilson, a/k/a John E. Wilson, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer Shamika BRODDY, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before MOTZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 621
Pages: 246–247

Head Matter:
John Ervin WILSON, Jr. a/k/a John Wilson, a/k/a John E. Wilson, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer Shamika BRODDY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 15-6687.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 28, 2015.
Decided: Nov. 5, 2015.
John Ervin Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. David Cornwell Holler, Lee Erter Wilson Holler & Smith, LLC, Sumter, SC, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
John Ervin Wilson appeals the magistrate judge's% order granting summary judgment to defendant and dismissing Wilson's complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wilson v. Broddy, No. 9:14-cv-02531-BM (D.S.C. Mar. 30, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2012).