Case Name: In re Sean Anthony VARNADO, Respondent
Court: District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Decision Date: 2015-04-30
Citations: 113 A.3d 1085
Docket Number: No. 15-BG-10
Parties: In re Sean Anthony VARNADO, Respondent.
Judges: BEFORE: BECKWITH, Associate Judge, and KING and REID, Senior Judges.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 113
Pages: 1085–1085

Head Matter:
In re Sean Anthony VARNADO, Respondent.
No. 15-BG-10.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Filed April 30, 2015.
BEFORE: BECKWITH, Associate Judge, and KING and REID, Senior Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
On consideration of the certified order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland indefinitely suspending respondent from the practice of law with the right to apply for reinstatement in 90 days, see Attorney Grievance Com'n of Maryland v. Varnado, 440 Md. 678, 103 A.3d 1045 (2014), this court's January 30, 2015, order directing respondent to show eause why the functionally equivalent discipline in the form of a suspension for a period of 90 days, with reinstatement conditioned upon a showing of fitness, should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file either a response to this court's order or his affidavit as required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is
ORDERED that Sean Anthony Varnado is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a period of 90 days with reinstatement contingent upon a showing of fitness. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C.2010), and In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007) (re-buttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate). It is
FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement the period of respondent's suspension will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C.Bar. R. XI, § 14(g).