Case Name: ERNEST HALL, Defendant and Appellant, v. TERRITORY OF ARIZONA, Plaintiff and Respondent
Court: Arizona Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Arizona
Decision Date: 1904-03-26
Citations: 8 Ariz. 409
Docket Number: Criminal No. 175
Parties: ERNEST HALL, Defendant and Appellant, v. TERRITORY OF ARIZONA, Plaintiff and Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Arizona Reports
Volume: 8
Pages: 409–409

Head Matter:
[Criminal No. 175.
Filed March 26, 1904.]
[76 Pac. 476.]
ERNEST HALL, Defendant and Appellant, v. TERRITORY OF ARIZONA, Plaintiff and Respondent.
1.' Criminal Law—Practice—Appeal—Rev. Stats. 1901, Pen. Code, Sec. 1067, Construed.—No appeal can be taken from a judgment of the district court rendered in a ease appealed from a justice couit, such appeal being expressly prohibited by the statute, supra.
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District in and for the County of Navajo. R. E. Sloan, Judge.
Dismissed.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1 Klock & Owen, and W. H. Burbage, for Appellant.
E. W. Wells, Attorney-General, and E. S. Clark, District Attorney, and Joseph E. Morrison, for Respondent. •

Opinion:
THE COURT.
The appellant in this case was tried before a justice of the peace upon a misdemeanor charge, and was convicted. He appealed to the district court, where a trial de novo again resulted in a judgment of conviction. He now seeks to prosecute a further appeal to the supreme court. From this he is debarred by section 1067 of the Penal Code of 1901, which provides: ". . . There shall be no appeal from a judgment of the district court rendered in a case appealed from a justice, police, or recorder's court."
The appeal will therefore be dismissed.