Case Name: Richard BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-09-18
Citations: 679 So. 2d 367
Docket Number: No. 95-3311
Parties: Richard BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: GLICKSTEIN, WARNER and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 679
Pages: 367–367

Head Matter:
Richard BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 95-3311.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Sept. 18, 1996.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Karen E. Ehrlich, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and James J. Carney, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for ap-pellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm both conditions of probation except for that portion of condition eleven (11) that requires random alcohol testing, which we reverse and remand with direction to strike same.
This requirement fails to be reasonably related to the rehabilitation of appellant, bears no relationship to the crime for which appellant was convicted, and relates to conduct that is otherwise legal. See Biller v. State, 618 So.2d 734 (Fla.1993); Fernandez v. State, 677 So.2d 332 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
GLICKSTEIN, WARNER and GROSS, JJ., concur.