Case Name: Marvin FACTOR and Kathleen Factor, Petitioners, v. BICYCLE TECHNOLOGY INC., Specialized Bicycle Components and Shimano Industrial Co., Ltd. v. GIANT MANUFACTURING CO., Respondent, and City of Philadelphia
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1997-04-16
Citations: 691 A.2d 459
Docket Number: 
Parties: Marvin FACTOR and Kathleen Factor, Petitioners, v. BICYCLE TECHNOLOGY INC., Specialized Bicycle Components and Shimano Industrial Co., Ltd. v. GIANT MANUFACTURING CO., Respondent, and City of Philadelphia.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 691
Pages: 459–459

Head Matter:
Marvin FACTOR and Kathleen Factor, Petitioners, v. BICYCLE TECHNOLOGY INC., Specialized Bicycle Components and Shimano Industrial Co., Ltd. v. GIANT MANUFACTURING CO., Respondent, and City of Philadelphia.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
April 16, 1997.
David F. Binder, Philadelphia, for Petitioner.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 16th day of April, 1997, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to whether the trial court erred by refusing to strike the testimony of respondent's expert witness. This ease is to be scheduled for oral argument.