Case Name: STATE v. BILL SCOGGINS
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 1930-12-10
Citations: 199 N.C. 821
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE v. BILL SCOGGINS.
Judges: 
Reporter: North Carolina Reports
Volume: 199
Pages: 821–821

Head Matter:
STATE v. BILL SCOGGINS.
(Filed 10 December, 1930.)
Appeal by defendant from Moore, J., at April Term, 1930, of Polic.
Criminal prosecutions tried upon indictments charging tbe defendant (1) with baying and keeping in bis possession spirituous or vinous liquors for tbe purpose of sale (C. S., 3379) and with transporting tbe same (C. S., 3411(b), and (2) with resisting an officer in violation of C. S., 4378.
From an adverse verdict on both indictments, and judgments of eighteen months on tbe roads on each indictment, to run concurrently, tbe defendant appeals, assigning errors.
Attorney-General Brum/mitt and Assistant Attorney-General Nash for the State.
Quinn, Hamrick & Harris and J. S. Dockery for defendant.

Opinion:
Pee CubiaM.
A careful examination of tbe records reveals no reversible error committed on trial. Tbe cases are simple and involve no new question of law. It would serve no useful purpose to set out tbe evidence.
No error.