Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Robert E. McVEIGH, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-11-06
Citations: 66 S.W.3d 42
Docket Number: No. WD 58983
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Robert E. McVEIGH, Appellant.
Judges: Before THOMAS H. NEWTON, P.J., HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN and JAMES M. SMART, JR., JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 66
Pages: 42–43

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Robert E. McVEIGH, Appellant.
No. WD 58983.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Nov. 6, 2001.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Dec. 26, 2001.
Application for Transfer Denied Feb. 26, 2002.
Elizabeth Unger Carlyle, Lee’s Summit, MO, for appellant.
John M. Morris, III, Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Susan Glass, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before THOMAS H. NEWTON, P.J., HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN and JAMES M. SMART, JR., JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Robert E. McVeigh (appellant) was convicted by a jury of statutory sodomy in the first degree, § 566.062 RSMo 1994. Mr. McVeigh claims trial court error in admitting videotaped interviews of the victim and his younger sister; he argues that the trial court erred in admitting the testimony of the social services worker, the deputy sheriff, and the mother concerning out-of-court statements made to them by the victim and by his sister; and he asserts that the trial court plainly erred in admitting evidence concerning appellant's acts with the victim's younger sister.
For the reasons set forth in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).