Case Name: Michael D. GILLISPIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-06-15
Citations: 184 F. App'x 744
Docket Number: No. 05-5080
Parties: Michael D. GILLISPIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before LUCERO, EBEL, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 184
Pages: 744–745

Head Matter:
Michael D. GILLISPIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 05-5080.
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
June 15, 2006.
Richmond J. Brownson, Timothy M. White, Tulsa, OK, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Wyn Dee Baker, United States Attorney, Tulsa, OK, Katauna J. King, Office of the General Counsel, Social Security Administration, Dallas, TX, for DefendantAppellee.
Before LUCERO, EBEL, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER AND JUDGMENT
DAVID M. EBEL, Circuit Judge.
Michael D. Gillispie appeals the district court's denial of an award of attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1). In McGraw v. Barnhart, 450 F.3d 493 (10th Cir.2006), this court held that § 406(b)(1) allows an award of fees when the district court has remanded a Title II Social Security case for further proceedings. Thus, the judgment of the district court is REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings in light of McGraw. Appellant's motion to file an addendum of recent citations is GRANTED and the Clerk is directed to accept the addendum for filing as of the date of original receipt.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously to grant the parties' request for a decision on the briefs without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.