Case Name: George Lee Edward HURD, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN, FCI ESTILL, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-02-13
Citations: 465 F. App'x 229
Docket Number: No. 11-6970
Parties: George Lee Edward HURD, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN, FCI ESTILL, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 465
Pages: 229–229

Head Matter:
George Lee Edward HURD, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN, FCI ESTILL, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 11-6970.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 9, 2012.
Decided: Feb. 13, 2012.
George Lee Edward Hurd, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
George Lee Edward Hurd, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2011) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hurd v. Warden, No. 0:11-cv-00602-RMG, 2011 WL 2020881 (D.S.C. May 24, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.