Case Name: Carlos CASTILLO-PAREDES, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-02-11
Citations: 266 F. App'x 615
Docket Number: No. 04-76647
Parties: Carlos CASTILLO-PAREDES, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, O’SCANNLAIN, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 266
Pages: 615–615

Head Matter:
Carlos CASTILLO-PAREDES, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 04-76647.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Feb. 6, 2008.
Filed Feb. 11, 2008.
Tim R. Everett, Esq., Law Offices of Tim R. Everett, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.
CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Richard M. Evans, Esq., Rebecca Anne Niburg, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, O’SCANNLAIN, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
The record does not compel the conclusion that Castillo-Paredes was credible. His testimony about what he told the Justice of the Peace regarding a shooting incident was internally inconsistent and inconsistent with his supporting documentation. See Chebchoub v. INS, 257 F.3d 1038, 1043 (9th Cir.2001). In the absence of credible testimony, Castillo-Paredes failed to demonstrate eligibility for asylum, withholding of removal, or CAT relief. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156-57 (9th Cir.2003).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.