Case Name: W. L. McKNIGHT, d/b/a Webster Outdoor Advertising Co. (not Inc.), Appellant, v. HIALEAH RACE COURSE, INC., Gulfstream Park Racing Association, Inc., Tropical Park, Inc., Florida Thoroughbred Council, Florida Thoroughbred Breeders Association, and Florida State Racing Commission, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1970-05-19
Citations: 235 So. 2d 552
Docket Number: No. 69-926
Parties: W. L. McKNIGHT, d/b/a Webster Outdoor Advertising Co. (not Inc.), Appellant, v. HIALEAH RACE COURSE, INC., Gulfstream Park Racing Association, Inc., Tropical Park, Inc., Florida Thoroughbred Council, Florida Thoroughbred Breeders Association, and Florida State Racing Commission, Appellees.
Judges: Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 235
Pages: 552–553

Head Matter:
W. L. McKNIGHT, d/b/a Webster Outdoor Advertising Co. (not Inc.), Appellant, v. HIALEAH RACE COURSE, INC., Gulfstream Park Racing Association, Inc., Tropical Park, Inc., Florida Thoroughbred Council, Florida Thoroughbred Breeders Association, and Florida State Racing Commission, Appellees.
No. 69-926.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 19, 1970.
Taylor, Brion, Buker, Hames, Greene & Whitworth, and Robert Paterno, Miami, for appellant.
Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Arden M. Siegendorf, Asst. Atty. Gen., Shelby Highsmith, Miami, for Florida State Racing Comm., appellee.
Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiffs appeals a final judgment for defendant Florida State Racing Commission entered pursuant to an order dismissing plaintiff's complaint without leave to amend. The only point presented upon appeal urges that appellant should have been granted leave to amend. The order dismissing the complaint is dated May 16, 1969. The final judgment is dated October 3, 1969. The evidence does not reflect a request for leave to amend. Under these circumstances we think that the record does not reflect an abuse of discretion by the trial judge. See Sorkin v. Rovin, Fla.App.1969, 227 So.2d 492.
Affirmed.