Case Name: Jose Brito, Respondent, v. RDJ Express Transport et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2016-01-28
Citations: 135 A.D.3d 651
Docket Number: 
Parties: Jose Brito, Respondent, v RDJ Express Transport et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 135
Pages: 651–651

Head Matter:
Jose Brito, Respondent, v RDJ Express Transport et al., Appellants.
[23 NYS3d 572]

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Norma Ruiz, J.), entered April 17, 2014, which granted plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion denied.
Plaintiff failed to establish entitlement to summary judgment on the issue of liability in this action where plaintiff's vehicle was double-parked in a lane of travel in violation of 34 RCNY 4-08 (f) (1), when it was struck by defendants' vehicle as that vehicle attempted to pass plaintiff's car. Plaintiff failed to show that his own negligence in double-parking his car in the traveling lane was not a proximate cause of the accident (see White v Diaz, 49 AD3d 134, 138-140 [1st Dept 2008]; Gonzalez v Ceesay, 98 AD3d 1078 [2d Dept 2012]), and we reject his assertion that the fact that his vehicle was double-parked merely furnished the occasion for the accident, as a matter of law (see Pickett v Verizon N.Y. Inc., 129 AD3d 641 [1st Dept 2015]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Sweeny, Gische and Kapnick, JJ.