Case Name: FINST DEV., INC., Appellant, v. Isaac BEMAOR, Sergio Goldemberg, David Saul, Vulf Mintz, Luba Mintz and Zelman Mintz, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1984-03-06
Citations: 449 So. 2d 292
Docket Number: Nos. 83-619, 83-1714
Parties: FINST DEV., INC., Appellant, v. Isaac BEMAOR, Sergio Goldemberg, David Saul, Vulf Mintz, Luba Mintz and Zelman Mintz, Appellees.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 449
Pages: 292–293

Head Matter:
FINST DEV., INC., Appellant, v. Isaac BEMAOR, Sergio Goldemberg, David Saul, Vulf Mintz, Luba Mintz and Zelman Mintz, Appellees.
Nos. 83-619, 83-1714.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 6, 1984.
Rehearing Denied April 13, 1984.
See also, Fla.App., 449 So.2d 290.
Richard M. Gale, Stabinski & Funt, Miami, for appellant.
Fuller & Feingold and John Fuller, Miami Beach, for appellees.
Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a final summary judgment rescinding certain contracts for the sale of condominium units, returning the deposits thereon to the plaintiff/buyers, and awarding attorney's fees for the plaintiff/buyers. The material facts of this case, although complex, are undisputed on this record. We conclude that based on these facts the contracts herein were properly rescinded as a matter of law for failure of the defendant/seller to comply substantially with certain provisions of the Florida Condominium Act, § 718.202, 718.-503, 718.504, Fla.Stat. (1981), and the Federal Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1701 et seq. (1982); see Dorchester Development, Inc. v. Burk, 439 So.2d 1032 (Fla.3d DCA 1983). We also agree that as a matter of law the counterclaim herein has no merit based on this record. Finally, we conclude that the attorney's fees awarded below were reasonable and authorized by Section 718.-506(2), Florida Statutes (1981). See Pfohl v. Pfohl, 345 So.2d 371, 379 (Fla.3d DCA 1977). We accordingly affirm in all respects the final summary judgment under review.
Affirmed.