Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jovonnie PEEPLES, Appellant; Jovonnie PEEPLES, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-10-03
Citations: 907 S.W.2d 332
Docket Number: Nos. 66396, 67855
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jovonnie PEEPLES, Appellant. Jovonnie PEEPLES, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and WHITE, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 907
Pages: 332–332

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jovonnie PEEPLES, Appellant. Jovonnie PEEPLES, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 66396, 67855.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Oct. 3, 1995.
Rosalynn Koch, Columbia, Office of the State Public Defender, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Cheryl A. Caponegro, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and WHITE, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Jovonnie Peeples appeals conviction of Assault First Degree, § 565.050 RSMo 1986, and denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. No legal error occurred, the state proved all elements of the crime. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential value. Judgments affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b) and Rule 84.16(b).