Case Name: In the Matter of Sharon K., Appellant, v. Mark C., Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1993-12-29
Citations: 199 A.D.2d 981
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Sharon K., Appellant, v Mark C., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 199
Pages: 981–981

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Sharon K., Appellant, v Mark C., Respondent.
[608 NYS2d 923]

Opinion:
Case held, decision reserved and matter remitted to Erie County Family Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: In this paternity proceeding, the Judicial Hearing Officer failed to set forth the basis for his finding that petitioner did not meet her burden to prove respondent's paternity by clear and convincing evidence. Petitioner was physically separated, but not divorced, from her husband when the child was conceived. The evidence bearing on lack of access by petitioner's husband and the sharp conflict in the evidence submitted by petitioner and respondent presented questions of credibility for the trier of fact. Where questions of credibility are at issue, findings of fact are essential for meaningful appellate review (Matter of Joan S. v Ronald B., 71 AD2d 606). We, therefore, remit the matter to Family Court to make findings of fact. (Appeal from Order of Erie County Family Court, Trost, J.H.O.—Paternity.) Present—Denman, P. J., Pine, Law-ton, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.