Case Name: PAPPAGEORGE v. ROSA et al.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1954-05-10
Citations: 212 F.2d 587
Docket Number: No. 250, Docket 22964
Parties: PAPPAGEORGE v. ROSA et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 212
Pages: 587–587

Head Matter:
PAPPAGEORGE v. ROSA et al.
No. 250, Docket 22964.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued May 3, 1954.
Decided May 10, 1954.
Samuel C. Derman, Bridgeport, Conn. (George Koenig and Louis I. Gladstone, Bridgeport, Conn., on the brief), for plaintiff-appellant.
John F. McGowan, Bridgeport, Conn., for defendants-appellees.
Before CLARK, FRANK and MEDINA, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this landowner's action for damages to his buildings from an adjoining sewer excavation, plaintiff's basic contention of an absolute duty to avoid a cave-in on the part of the defendant contractor must fail. Such duty appertains only to the land in its natural state; where, as here, it is encumbered with buildings, the basis of liability must be negligence, as the trial judge correctly charged. Canfield Rubber Co. v. Leary & Co., 99 Conn. 40, 121 A. 283; Carrig v. Andrews, 127, Conn. 403, 17 A.2d 520, 132 A.L.R. 993; 4 Restatement, Torts § 817 (1939). The other assigned errors are without merit. The judge's comments on the evidence were restrained and appropriate, particularly when he emphasized the ultimate responsibility of the jury as to the facts. His charge was adequate and fair; moreover, no appropriate objection, upon which to found claim of error, was tak- . en. And his inadvertent mistake in one instance as to a date could have misled no one. The case was well tried.
Affirmed.