Case Name: GLENCORE DENREES PARIS and Glencore Grain Rotterdam B.V., Petitioners-Appellants, v. SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM, Respondent-Appellee, Department Of National Store Branch 1 (Vietnam), in its own capacity and as a state organization, representative and agent of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, Tien Giang Export-Import Company (Tigimex) Vietnam, in its own capacity and as representative, delegate and agent of the Ministry of Agriculture and Food Industry of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, Respondents
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-01-08
Citations: 24 F. App'x 100
Docket Number: Docket No. 01-6007
Parties: GLENCORE DENREES PARIS and Glencore Grain Rotterdam B.V., Petitioners-Appellants, v. SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM, Respondent-Appellee, Department Of National Store Branch 1 (Vietnam), in its own capacity and as a state organization, representative and agent of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, Tien Giang Export-Import Company (Tigimex) Vietnam, in its own capacity and as representative, delegate and agent of the Ministry of Agriculture and Food Industry of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 24
Pages: 100–101

Head Matter:
GLENCORE DENREES PARIS and Glencore Grain Rotterdam B.V., Petitioners-Appellants, v. SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM, Respondent-Appellee, Department Of National Store Branch 1 (Vietnam), in its own capacity and as a state organization, representative and agent of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, Tien Giang Export-Import Company (Tigimex) Vietnam, in its own capacity and as representative, delegate and agent of the Ministry of Agriculture and Food Industry of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, Respondents.
Docket No. 01-6007.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Jan. 8, 2002.
Jeremy J.O. Harwood, Healy & Baillie, LLP, New York, NY, for Appellants.
Kevin W. Goering, Coudert Brothers, Michael G. Davies, on the brief, New York, NY, for Appellee.
Present LEVAD, CABRANES, and STRAUB, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
SUMMARY ORDER
IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be and it hereby is VACATED and the matter REMANDED.
Petitioners appeal two orders of the distinct court; the first, dated October 10, 2000, removing the Socialist Republic of Vietnam from its December 17, 1999 default judgment; and the second, dated December 12, 2000, denying petitioners' request for reconsideration and an opportunity to correct personal service upon Vietnam. In view of the facts that (1) the defect in service was not called to petitioners' attention prior to mid-June at the earliest (and not clearly signaled until the district court's memorandum of July 6, 2000), (2) the district court was divested of jurisdiction upon petitioners' filing of a notice of appeal on June 21, 2000, and (3) upon restoration of the case to the district court, petitioners promptly requested an opportunity to remedy the defect in service, we believe the district court should, in the exercise of its discretion, have permitted petitioners the opportunity to effectuate service of process in accordance with the requirements of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, 28 U.S.C § 1608.
Accordingly, we vacate the judgement and remand.