Case Name: In the Matter of Abraham Kreiss et al., Respondents, v. New York State Tax Commission, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1984-03-20
Citations: 61 N.Y.2d 916
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Abraham Kreiss et al., Respondents, v New York State Tax Commission, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 61
Pages: 916–918

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Abraham Kreiss et al., Respondents, v New York State Tax Commission, Appellant.
Argued February 14, 1984;
decided March 20, 1984
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Wayne L. Benjamin and Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for appellant.
Christine Carey Daniels and Stephen E. Cooper for respondents.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the determination of the Tax Commission reinstated.
The full amount of capital gain realized from the sale was included in petitioners' adjusted gross income on their Federal income tax return for 1974 and thus was properly reported on their New York State income tax return for that year (Tax Law, § 612). Although the Federal Government allowed the petitioners a partial refund in 1977 under the "claim of right" doctrine, that had no effect on their Federal adjusted gross income for 1974 (US Code, tit 26, § 1341) and there is no corresponding refund provision in the New York statute. Consequently, no mistake within the meaning of section 697 of the Tax Law was made on petitioners' 1974 New York State income tax return. Any inequity which may result from the dissimilarity between the Federal and State statutes is a consequence of the present statutory scheme and is not a matter within the authority of the judiciary to correct.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye concur in memorandum.
Order reversed, etc.