Case Name: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Gregg CAMPBELL, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2007-01-25
Citations: 948 So. 2d 725
Docket Number: No. SC05-1844
Parties: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Gregg CAMPBELL, Respondent.
Judges: LEWIS, C.J., and ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 948
Pages: 725–731

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Gregg CAMPBELL, Respondent.
No. SC05-1844.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Jan. 25, 2007.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, FL; Celia A. Terenzio, Bureau Chief, and Monique E. L’ltalien, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, FL, for Petitioner.
Samuel R. Halpern, Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted jurisdiction to review State v. Campbell, 911 So.2d 192 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005), a decision by the Fourth District Court of Appeal certifying a question to this Court as one involving great public importance. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. However, during oral argument, the parties conceded that the facts as outlined in the Fourth District's decision are materially different from those depicted in the trial court record. Neither of the parties filed a motion for rehearing with the Fourth District to address these materially disparate facts. We conclude that reviewing a case under such circumstances would place the instant proceeding in the procedural posture of a rehearing. This Court lacks jurisdiction to rehear a decision issued by a district court; therefore, we exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, this review proceeding is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
LEWIS, C.J., and ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
PARIENTE, J., concurs with an opinion.
WELLS, J., dissents with an opinion, in which CANTERO and BELL, JJ., concur.