Case Name: Jerome BRANCH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ron CHERRY; Lieutenant Jones; P.A. Snowdy; Nurse Brown; Ms. Telinski, Head Nurse; Sargeant Adams; Nurse Whiteside; Nurse Goldsmith, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-03-18
Citations: 30 F. App'x 274
Docket Number: No. 01-8022
Parties: Jerome BRANCH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ron CHERRY; Lieutenant Jones; P.A. Snowdy; Nurse Brown; Ms. Telinski, Head Nurse; Sargeant Adams; Nurse Whiteside; Nurse Goldsmith, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WIDENER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 30
Pages: 274–275

Head Matter:
Jerome BRANCH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ron CHERRY; Lieutenant Jones; P.A. Snowdy; Nurse Brown; Ms. Telinski, Head Nurse; Sargeant Adams; Nurse Whiteside; Nurse Goldsmith, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 01-8022.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 6, 2002.
Decided March 18, 2002.
Jerome Branch, pro se.
Before WIDENER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Jerome Branch appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. See Porter v. Nussle, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 983, — L.Ed.2d - (2002); Booth v. Churner, 532 U.S. 731, 121 S.Ct. 1819, 149 L.Ed.2d 958 (2001). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Branch v. Lieutenant Jones, No. CA-01-407-2 (E.D.Va. Nov. 15, 2001). We dis pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.