Case Name: Darrell S. COLLINS, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Candy Y. SANCHEZ, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2017-08-29
Citations: 527 S.W.3d 186
Docket Number: No. ED 105031
Parties: Darrell S. COLLINS, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Candy Y. SANCHEZ, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 527
Pages: 186–186

Head Matter:
Darrell S. COLLINS, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Candy Y. SANCHEZ, Defendant/Respondent.
No. ED 105031
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Filed: August 29, 2017
Victor C. Strauss, Jr., 2249 S. Brent-wood Blvd., Suite 7,-St. Louis, MO 68144, For Plaintiff/Appellant.
Lauren A. Lageson, Daniel E. Wilke, 2708 Olive Street, St. Louis, MO 68103, For Defendant/Respondent.
Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Darrell S. Collins appeals from the trial court's Order and Judgment rendered in a case initiated by him against Candy Y. Sanchez for damages sustained as a result of a motor vehicle accident. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Brittany Sobery Family Ltd. P'ship v. Coinmach Corp., 392 S.W.3d 46, 49 (Mo. App. E.D. 2013). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to, the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).