Case Name: COLLATERAL INV. CO. v. UNITED STATES
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1927-02-07
Citations: 17 F.2d 374
Docket Number: No. 4643
Parties: COLLATERAL INV. CO. v. UNITED STATES.
Judges: Before GILBERT and RUDKIN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 17
Pages: 374–374

Head Matter:
COLLATERAL INV. CO. v. UNITED STATES.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
February 7, 1927.)
No. 4643.
Hamblen & Gilbert, of Spokane, Wash., for plaintiff in error.
H. E. Ray, U. S. Atty., and Wm. H. Langroise, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Boise, Idaho.
Before GILBERT and RUDKIN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
No claim is made in this case that the driver of the truck was prosecuú ed with effect, or at all, under the National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. § 10138% et seq.) for the transportation of intoxicating liquor in violation of law, and the automobile was therefore subject to forfeiture under section 3450 of the Revised Statutes (Comp. St. § 6352). United States v. One Ford Coupé Automobile, 47 S. Ct. 154, 71 L. Ed. -; Port Gardner Investment Co. v. United States (decided by the Supreme Court November 23, 1926) 47 S. Ct. 165, 71 L. Ed.
Judgment affirmed.