Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Larry Roscoe GUNNELL, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-12-28
Citations: 358 F. App'x 420
Docket Number: No. 09-7070
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Larry Roscoe GUNNELL, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 358
Pages: 420–420

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Larry Roscoe GUNNELL, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-7070.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 17, 2009.
Decided: Dec. 28, 2009.
Larry Roscoe Gunnell, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Richard Daniel Cooke, Norval George Metcalf, Assistant United States Attorneys, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Larry Roscoe Gunnell, Jr., appeals the district court's orders denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Gunnell, No. 3:99-cr-00022-RLW-1 (E.D. Va. Apr. 23, 2009; May 15, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.