Case Name: Mary BROONER, Appellant, v. HANNEKE'S LOGOWEAR, LLC and Division of Employment Security, Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2013-01-08
Citations: 389 S.W.3d 730
Docket Number: No. ED 98563
Parties: Mary BROONER, Appellant, v. HANNEKE’S LOGOWEAR, LLC and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., C.J., ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J., and ELLEN LEVY SIWAK, SP. J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 389
Pages: 730–730

Head Matter:
Mary BROONER, Appellant, v. HANNEKE’S LOGOWEAR, LLC and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.
No. ED 98563.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Jan. 8, 2013.
Margo Steinlage, John J. Ammann, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Shelly A. Kintzel, Michael Pritchett, Division of Employment Security, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Hanneke’s Logowear, LLC, St. Louis, MO, Acting pro se.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., C.J., ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J., and ELLEN LEVY SIWAK, SP. J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Mary Brooner appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying her unemployment benefits on the grounds that she left work voluntarily without good cause attributable to her employer, Hanneke's Logowear, LLC. We find that the Commission did not err in denying Brooner benefits. We affirm.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).