Case Name: Earl BREWER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2011-06-29
Citations: 99 So. 3d 519
Docket Number: No. 3D10-1160
Parties: Earl BREWER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before GERSTEN, WELLS, and EMAS, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 99
Pages: 519–520

Head Matter:
Earl BREWER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D10-1160.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
June 29, 2011.
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Harvey J. Sepler, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jill D. Kramer, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before GERSTEN, WELLS, and EMAS, JJ.

Opinion:
WELLS, Judge.
Earl Brewer appeals from an order modifying his probation to require electronic monitoring. Because the transcript of the modification hearing clearly confirms that the trial court intended to apply section 948.063 of the Florida Statutes and not the Jessica Lunsford Act as recited in the court's written order, we reverse and remand for correction of the order modifying probation to correctly reflect the trial court's oral ruling. See Stark v. State, 712 So.2d 454, 455 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) (finding that the written order of probation should match the trial court's oral pronouncements); Reiter v. State, 674 So.2d 189, 190-91 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996) (finding that the "written [probation] order must be modified to conform to the court's oral pronouncement"). The order on appeal is otherwise affirmed.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions.