Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Dana RUFF, Appellant; Dana RUFF, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1994-06-14
Citations: 880 S.W.2d 333
Docket Number: No. 61774
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Dana RUFF, Appellant. Dana RUFF, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, C.J., and PUDLOWSKI and SIMON, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 880
Pages: 333–333

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Dana RUFF, Appellant. Dana RUFF, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 61774.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
June 14, 1994.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 28, 1994.
John A. Klosterman, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Becky Owenson Kilpatrick, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, C.J., and PUDLOWSKI and SIMON, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Dana Ruff, appeals her jury conviction for two counts of second degree murder in violation of RSMo § 565.021 and two counts of armed criminal action in violation of RSMo § 571.015 in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County. Appellant also appeals the denial of her Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs and arguments of the parties, as well as the transcripts and the legal file, and find no clear error in the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the trial court. In addition, we find that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We, therefore, affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b). The parties have been provided with a memorandum, solely for their own information, setting forth the reasons for our decision.