Case Name: N. Curtiss PETITJEAN, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Watson ARCENEAUX et al., Defendants and Appellants
Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1972-09-19
Citations: 266 So. 2d 565
Docket Number: No. 4058
Parties: N. Curtiss PETITJEAN, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Watson ARCENEAUX et al., Defendants and Appellants.
Judges: Before CULPEPPER, MILLER and DOMENGEAUX, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 266
Pages: 565–566

Head Matter:
N. Curtiss PETITJEAN, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Watson ARCENEAUX et al., Defendants and Appellants.
No. 4058.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.
Sept. 19, 1972.
Harold L. Savoie, Lafayette, for defendant-appellant.
Petitjean & Petitjean, by Martin Petit-jean, II, Rayne, for plaintiff-appellee.
Before CULPEPPER, MILLER and DOMENGEAUX, JJ.

Opinion:
CULPEPPER, Judge.
ON MOTION TO REMAND
Plaintiff appellee filed a motion to remand this case to enable him to traverse the affidavits of poverty filed by defendants-appellants in support of their motion to prosecute this appeal in forma pauperis. Our jurisprudence is now established that plaintiff appellee is entitled to the remand which he seeks. See Affiliated Foods, Inc. v. Blanchard, 256 So.2d 363 (3rd Cir. 1971) and the authorities cited therein.
For the reasons assigned, this case is remanded to the district court for the purpose of allowing plaintiff-appellee to traverse the affidavits of poverty on the basis of which appellant was permitted to proceed in forma pauperis.
Remanded.