Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stacy POWELL, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-02-12
Citations: 312 F. App'x 204
Docket Number: No. 08-13991
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stacy POWELL, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before BIRCH, CARNES and HULL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 312
Pages: 204–205

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stacy POWELL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-13991
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Feb. 12, 2009.
Patricia D. Barksdale, Jacksonville, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Rosemary T. Cakmis, Federal Public Defender, Orlando, FL, Donna Lee Elm, Federal Public Defender, Tampa, FL, Lynn Palmer Bailey, Federal Public Defender, Jacksonville, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before BIRCH, CARNES and HULL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Stacy Powell appeals his resentencingunder 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Although the district court reduced Powell's sentence for his crack cocaine conviction under Amendment 706 of the ' sentencing guidelines, it denied Powell's request to reduce his sentence further under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Powell con tends that the district court erred in failing to apply Booker at his resentencing.
Recently this circuit joined the Eighth, Fourth, and Tenth Circuits in holding that Booker does not apply at resentencing proceedings under § 3582(c)(2). United States v. Melvin, 556 F.3d 1190 (11th Cir.2009); see also United States v. Starks, 551 F.3d 839 (8th Cir.2009); United States v. Dumphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir.2009); United States v. Rhodes, 549 F.3d 833 (10th Cir.2008). There was no error at the resentencing.
AFFIRMED.