Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John Volpe, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1983-10-27
Citations: 60 N.Y.2d 803
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Volpe, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 60
Pages: 803–805

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Volpe, Appellant.
Argued September 22, 1983;
decided October 27, 1983
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Barry A. Schwartz and Bernard F. Ferrera for appellant.
Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney (<Jeanne E. Zunich and Amyjane Rettew of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Police officers entered defendant's apartment without a warrant after a Federal agent and the officers overheard incriminating conversations from inside the apartment. Defendant argues that a finding of probable cause cannot be sustained because the agent and officers were not lawfully present in the hallway outside his apartment, having failed to establish that their entry into the common areas of the locked, restricted access multiple-unit dwelling was authorized. Examination of the record of the suppression hearing reveals, however, that the legality of these officers' presence in the building was never questioned by defendant and that argument is thus not preserved for review by this court (People v Martin, 50 NY2d 1029). To the extent defendant has argued that the information available to the officers was otherwise insufficient to support the finding of probable cause and exigent circumstances for the warrantless entry, he has failed to raise a reviewable issue of law, given the affirmance of the suppression court's findings on these issues (see People v Harrison, 57 NY2d 470).
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye concur.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.