Case Name: GEORGE ROSADO ET AL. v. BRIDGEPORT ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESAN CORPORATION ET AL.; J. KNECHT v. BRIDGEPORT ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESAN CORPORATION ET AL. IN RE APPLICATION OF NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY FOR ORDER VACATING PROTECTIVE ORDERS AND REQUIRING FILING OF DISCOVERY MATERIALS
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 2003-09-18
Citations: 266 Conn. 907
Docket Number: SC 17059
Parties: GEORGE ROSADO ET AL. v. BRIDGEPORT ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESAN CORPORATION ET AL. J. KNECHT v. BRIDGEPORT ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESAN CORPORATION ET AL. IN RE APPLICATION OF NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY FOR ORDER VACATING PROTECTIVE ORDERS AND REQUIRING FILING OF DISCOVERY MATERIALS
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 266
Pages: 907–908

Head Matter:
GEORGE ROSADO ET AL. v. BRIDGEPORT ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESAN CORPORATION ET AL. J. KNECHT v. BRIDGEPORT ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESAN CORPORATION ET AL. IN RE APPLICATION OF NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY FOR ORDER VACATING PROTECTIVE ORDERS AND REQUIRING FILING OF DISCOVERY MATERIALS
The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17059.

Opinion:
The petition by the Hartford Courant Company for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 77 Conn. App. 690 (AC 23014/AC 23015/AC 23016/AC 23017/AC 23069/AC 23078/AC 23079/AC 23161), is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court improperly granted the application to create a new file?"
NORCOTT and KATZ, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Ralph G. Elliot, in support of the petition.
John B. Farley, Joseph T. Sweeney, Ralph W. Johnson III, James V. Somers, James F. Stapleton, John F. Conway and W. Glen Pierson, in opposition.
Decided September 18, 2003