Case Name: Richard GAZIE, et ux., Appellants, v. ILLINOIS EMPLOYERS INSURANCE OF WAUSAU, etc., et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1988-10-05
Citations: 534 So. 2d 1171
Docket Number: No. 4-86-1118
Parties: Richard GAZIE, et ux., Appellants, v. ILLINOIS EMPLOYERS INSURANCE OF WAUSAU, etc., et al., Appellees.
Judges: HERSEY, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN, J., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 534
Pages: 1171–1173

Head Matter:
Richard GAZIE, et ux., Appellants, v. ILLINOIS EMPLOYERS INSURANCE OF WAUSAU, etc., et al., Appellees.
No. 4-86-1118.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Oct. 5, 1988.
Rehearing Granted, Rehearing En Banc and Certification Denied Jan. 10, 1989.
Edward A. Perse of Horton, Perse & Ginsberg, and Jeffrey M. Liggio, Miami, for appellants.
Paula C. Kessler of Pyszka, Kessler, Massey, Weldon, Catri, Holton & Douber-ley, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee-Illi-nois Employers Ins. of Wausau.
Steven R. Berger and Donna A. Weston of Steven R. Berger, P.A., Miami, and Pom-eroy, Pomeroy & Pomeroy, Fort Lauder-dale, for appellee-John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court's order for new trial. The verdict provided the jury was inconsistent with the trial court's instruction to the jury. As a result, the verdict reflected the jury's failure to follow the instruction.
HERSEY, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN, J., concur.
LETTS, J., dissents with opinion.