Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Duane Jeleal OSBOURNE, a/k/a Duane Anthony Osborne, a/k/a Rocky, a/k/a Sealed Defendant #12, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-09-05
Citations: 239 F. App'x 779
Docket Number: No. 06-7451
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Duane Jeleal OSBOURNE, a/k/a Duane Anthony Osborne, a/k/a Rocky, a/k/a Sealed Defendant #12, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 239
Pages: 779–779

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Duane Jeleal OSBOURNE, a/k/a Duane Anthony Osborne, a/k/a Rocky, a/k/a Sealed Defendant #12, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 06-7451.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 30, 2007.
Decided: Sept. 5, 2007.
Duane Jeleal Osbourne, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C.F. Shappert, United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Duane Jeleal Osbourne appeals the district court's order denying his motion to reconsider the denial of his motion filed under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582 (West 2000 & Supp.2007). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Osbourne, No. 3:95-cr-00178-12 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 4, 2006). We grant Osbourne's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.