Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Cicero Salmon, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1999-09-28
Citations: 264 A.D.2d 674
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Cicero Salmon, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 264
Pages: 674–674

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Cicero Salmon, Appellant.
[695 NYS2d 352]

Opinion:
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barbara Newman, J.), rendered June 26, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.
We conclude that defendant was not deprived of effective assistance of counsel. Although defense counsel failed to properly review the court's charge, when given the opportunity prior to the instruction of the jury, counsel corrected this oversight by obtaining a curative instruction that correctly stated the defense theory. In light of the evidence adduced at trial, the summations, and the court's charge as a whole (see, People v Andujas, 79 NY2d 113, 118), the court's supplementary instruction could not have confused the jury as to the theory advanced by defendant (see, People v Bright, 261 AD2d 192; People v Taylor, 191 AD2d 524, lv denied 82 NY2d 708; People v Corchado, 166 AD2d 279). Defendant has therefore failed to establish that defense counsel's conduct deprived him of a fair trial (see, People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 713-714). Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Nardelli, Wallach, Andrias and Friedman, JJ.