Case Name: Martha A. McMullin et ux., complainants and respondents, v. Sarah N. Doughty, defendant and appellant
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1902-06-23
Citations: 63 N.J. Eq. 800
Docket Number: 
Parties: Martha A. McMullin et ux., complainants and respondents, v. Sarah N. Doughty, defendant and appellant.
Judges: For affirmance—The Chiee-Justice, Van Syokel, Dixon, Garrison, Collins, Fort, Hendrickson, Pitney, Bogert, Krueger, Adams, Vredenburgh, Vroom—13.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 63
Pages: 800–800

Head Matter:
Martha A. McMullin et ux., complainants and respondents, v. Sarah N. Doughty, defendant and appellant.
[Filed June 23d, 1902.]
Mr. Herbert A. Drake, for the appellant.
Mr. David J. Pancoast, for the respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Grey delivered in the court below. See 17 Dick. Ch. Rep. 252.
For affirmance—The Chiee-Justice, Van Syokel, Dixon, Garrison, Collins, Fort, Hendrickson, Pitney, Bogert, Krueger, Adams, Vredenburgh, Vroom—13.
For reversal—None.