Case Name: In the MATTER OF Joan Othelia PINNOCK, An Attorney At Law (Attorney No. 010881997)
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 2018-12-05
Citations: 197 A.3d 1149
Docket Number: D-179 September Term 2017; 081628
Parties: In the MATTER OF Joan Othelia PINNOCK, An Attorney At Law (Attorney No. 010881997)
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 197
Pages: 1149–1150

Head Matter:
In the MATTER OF Joan Othelia PINNOCK, An Attorney At Law (Attorney No. 010881997)
D-179 September Term 2017
081628
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
December 5, 2018
ORDER

Opinion:
The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB
18-036, concluding that Joan Othelia Pinnock of Newark, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1997, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect, RPC 1.1(b) (pattern of neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(b) (failure to communicate with client), and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation);
And good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that Joan Othelia Pinnock is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months, effective January 4, 2019; and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys; and it is further
ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 1:20-20(c), respondent's failure to comply with the Affidavit of Compliance requirement of Rule 1:20-20(b)(15) may (1) preclude the Disciplinary Review Board from considering respondent's petition for reinstatement for a period of up to six months from the date respondent files proof of compliance; (2) be found to constitute a violation of RPC 8.1(b) and RPC 8.4(d) ; and (3) provide a basis for an action for contempt pursuant to Rule 1:10-2; and it is further
ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.