Case Name: Stephen Paul BENSKIN, Respondent-Appellant, v. Eileen Marie BENSKIN, Petitioner-Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1987-08-11
Citations: 734 S.W.2d 314
Docket Number: No. 52712
Parties: Stephen Paul BENSKIN, Respondent-Appellant, v. Eileen Marie BENSKIN, Petitioner-Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 734
Pages: 314–314

Head Matter:
Stephen Paul BENSKIN, Respondent-Appellant, v. Eileen Marie BENSKIN, Petitioner-Respondent.
No. 52712.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Aug. 11, 1987.
Gary S. Heggs, St. Charles, for respondent-appellant.
Claude C. Knight, St. Charles, for petitioner-respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
Dissolution case. Husband appeals. We affirm. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).