Case Name: Gale Ann Wallach, Appellant, v. Unger & Stutman, LLP, et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2008-02-28
Citations: 48 A.D.3d 360
Docket Number: 
Parties: Gale Ann Wallach, Appellant, v Unger & Stutman, LLP, et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 48
Pages: 360–361

Head Matter:
Gale Ann Wallach, Appellant, v Unger & Stutman, LLP, et al., Respondents.
[853 NYS2d 295]

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter B. Tolub, J.), entered December 12, 2006, which, in an action for legal malpractice, granted defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The action is barred by the unappealed order that recognized defendants' charging lien in the underlying action in which defendants were discharged by plaintiff (Smira v Roper, Barandes & Fertel, 302 AD2d 305 [2003]; Molinaro v Bedke, 281 AD2d 242 [2001]). This result is not affected by the parties' stipulation in which defendants agreed not to pursue the charging lien until after the disposition of the instant action. Since the charging lien had already been imposed, the stipulation merely deferred the proceeding for fixing the amount of defendants' fee. Concur—Lippman, P.J., Friedman, Williams and Acosta, JJ.