Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas Lee ASHBY, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-11-15
Citations: 488 F. App'x 731
Docket Number: No. 12-7168
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas Lee ASHBY, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 488
Pages: 731–732

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas Lee ASHBY, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-7168.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 13, 2012.
Decided: Nov. 15, 2012.
Thomas Lee Ashby, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Brian R. Hood, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Thomas Lee Ashby appeals a district court order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). The court denied the motion because the Guidelines amendments did not lower Ashby's Guidelines sentence. We conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion. United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir.2004) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.