Case Name: Emmanuel CABALLER-CAMACHO, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-05-18
Citations: 179 F. App'x 66
Docket Number: No. 05-2503
Parties: Emmanuel CABALLER-CAMACHO, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 179
Pages: 66–67

Head Matter:
Emmanuel CABALLER-CAMACHO, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant, Appellee.
No. 05-2503.
United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
May 18, 2006.
Dennis J. Cruz Pérez and Cruz, Rivera & Alvarez-Westwood, on brief for appellant.
Miguel A. Fernández and Fidel A. Sevillano Del Rio, Assistant United States Attorneys, and H.S. Garcia, United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.
Before TORRUELLA and LYNCH, Circuit Judges, and YOUNG, District Judge.
Of the District of Massachusetts, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This appeal involves a claim brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346, 2671 et seq., against a doctor at a Veterans Administration clinic. After careful review of the record, we discern no clear error in any of the district court's findings. Primus v. United States, 389 F.3d 231, 237 (1st Cir.2004). Particularly, the district court's assessment of witness credibility was hardly clearly erroneous. addendum and apparently deliberately retrained from citing them, we award double costs to appellee. Fed. R. App. P. 30(a)(1); 1st Cir. R. 28(a)(1), 38.
Affirmed. Double costs to appellee.
Since the appellant did not include the district court's findings and rulings in his