Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph SPRADLIN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-01-10
Citations: 708 F. App'x 638
Docket Number: No. 17-11629 Non-Argument Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph SPRADLIN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILLIAM PRYOR, NEWSOM and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 708
Pages: 638–639

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph SPRADLIN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 17-11629 Non-Argument Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
(January 10, 2018)
Colin P. McDonell, U.S. Attorney Service — Middle District of Florida, U.S. At- tome/s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Rosemary Cakmis, Donna Lee Elm, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Orlando, FL, for Defendant-Appellant
Joseph Andrew Spradlin, Pro Se
Before WILLIAM PRYOR, NEWSOM and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Stephen J. Langs, appointed counsel for Joseph Spradlin in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Spradlin's convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.