Case Name: FILLER v. GALLANTCHECK
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1900-11-07
Citations: 66 N.Y.S. 509
Docket Number: 
Parties: FILLER v. GALLANTCHECK.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 66
Pages: 509–509

Head Matter:
FILLER v. GALLANTCHECK.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
November 7, 1900.)
Action on Note—Demand.
An action will not lie against the indorser of a note where there is no evidence of demand on the maker.
Appeal from municipal court, borough of Manhattan.
Action by Harris Filler against Barnett Gallantcheek. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
Reversed.
Argued before TRUAX, P. J., and SCOTT and DUGRO, JJ.
I. Ellis, for appellant.
L. J. Jacoves, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
There was no evidence that there had been a demand for payment of the note upon the maker. The judgment against the appellant is therefore reversed, and a new trial is ordered; costs to abide the event. See Parker v. Stroud, 98 N. Y. 379.