Case Name: Willie BRUNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-01-27
Citations: 537 So. 2d 692
Docket Number: No. 88-378
Parties: Willie BRUNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ZEHMER and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 537
Pages: 692–692

Head Matter:
Willie BRUNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 88-378.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jan. 27, 1989.
Michael E. Allen, Public Defender, Phil Patterson, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee,- for appellant.
Robert L. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Carolyn J. Mosley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

Opinion:
SMITH, Chief Judge.
The appellant appeals several of the conditions of his probation. The record reflects that the appellant neither objected to the conditions when they were imposed nor filed a motion to strike or correct the challenged conditions. These allegedly improper conditions should have been brought to the trial court's attention before appeal was taken. Walker v. State, 461 So.2d 229 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Myers v. State, 426 So.2d 986 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). Accordingly, we affirm the order of probation without prejudice to the appellant to file a motion pursuant to Rule 3.800, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
AFFIRMED.
ZEHMER and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.