Case Name: In the Matter of Wayne Cooperider, Petitioner, v. Anthony J. Annucci, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2015-05-21
Citations: 128 A.D.3d 1266
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Wayne Cooperider, Petitioner, v Anthony J. Annucci, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 128
Pages: 1266–1266

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Wayne Cooperider, Petitioner, v Anthony J. Annucci, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.
[8 NYS3d 501]

Opinion:
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of possession of alcohol and possession of contraband. The charges stemmed from a search of petitioner's cube that revealed two containers of homemade alcohol. Although other inmates had access to the area where the containers were found, a reasonable inference of possession arises where, as here, the area where the contraband was discovered is within petitioner's control (see Matter of Velez v Prack, 122 AD3d 1041, 1041-1042 [2014]; Matter of Sweet v Poole, 48 AD3d 867, 868 [2008]). This inference, together with the misbehavior report and petitioner's testimony at the hearing, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Starling v New York State Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision, 123 AD3d 1195, 1196 [2014]; Matter of Sweet v Poole, 48 AD3d at 868; Matter of Vento v Goord, 41 AD3d 1123, 1123 [2007]). Furthermore, petitioner's contention that he was denied the right to call witnesses is not preserved for our review given his failure to object at the hearing (see Matter of Robinson v Annucci, 122 AD3d 981, 982 [2014]). In any event, his request for character witnesses was properly denied (see Matter of Elias v Fischer, 118 AD3d 1193, 1194 [2014]).
Garry, J.P., Egan Jr., Lynch and Clark, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.