Case Name: E. JACKSON PARRISH v. PIEDMONT PUBLISHING COMPANY
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 1967-11-01
Citations: 271 N.C. 711
Docket Number: 
Parties: E. JACKSON PARRISH v. PIEDMONT PUBLISHING COMPANY.
Judges: 
Reporter: North Carolina Reports
Volume: 271
Pages: 711–712

Head Matter:
E. JACKSON PARRISH v. PIEDMONT PUBLISHING COMPANY.
(Filed 1 November, 1967.)
Appeal and Error § 46—
Where the Supreme Court is evenly divided in opinion, one Justice not sitting, the judgment of the lower court will be affirmed without becoming a precedent.
Appeal by plaintiff from Oambill, J., 2 January 1967 Session of Forsyth.
Civil action against the defendant for libel.
From a judgment sustaining a demurrer ore tenus filed to the complaint, plaintiff appeals.
Harold B. Wilson for plaintiff appellant.
Wornble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice by W. P. Sandridge, Irving E. Carlyle and Linwood L. Davis for defendant appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The Court being evenly divided in opinion, three members of the Court being of opinion that the demurrer should be sustained and three members of the Court being of opinion that the demurrer should be overruled, Justice I. Beverly Lake taking no part in the consideration or decision of the case, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed after the manner of the usual practice of ap pellate courts in such cases and stands as the decision in this case without becoming a precedent. James v. Rogers, 231 N.C. 668, 58 S.E. 2d 640; MacClure v. Accident and Casualty Ins. Co., 230 N.C. 661, 55 S.E. 2d 192; Whitehurst v. Anderson, 228 N.C. 787, 44 S.E. 2d 358; Bullard v. Hotel Holding Co., 225 N.C. 766, 33 S.E. 2d 480; Howard v. Queen City Coach Co., 216 N.C. 799, 4 S.E. 2d 616; S. v. Swan, 209 N.C. 836, 183 S.E. 285; Nebel v. Nebel, 201 N.C. 840, 161 S.E. 223; Tarboro v. Johnson, 196 N.C. 824, 146 S.E. 803, and numerous cases to the same effect cited in 5 N. C. Digest, Courts, key No. 90(2), and the 1967 Cumulative Annual Pocket Part under the same topic and key number; 21 C.J.S. Courts § 189(c).
Affirmed.