Case Name: HIALEAH, INC., Appellant, v. OCALA BREEDERS' SALES CO., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-12-08
Citations: 609 So. 2d 161
Docket Number: No. 91-2346
Parties: HIALEAH, INC., Appellant, v. OCALA BREEDERS’ SALES CO., Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 609
Pages: 161–161

Head Matter:
HIALEAH, INC., Appellant, v. OCALA BREEDERS’ SALES CO., Appellee.
No. 91-2346.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 8, 1992.
Ruden, Barnett, McClosky, Smith, Schus-ter & Russell, Gregory P. Borgognoni and Kenneth S. Klein, Miami, for appellant.
Holland & Knight, Daniel S. Pearson, William F. Hamilton, and Lucinda A. Hof-mann, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Because the recent decision in Exceletech, Inc. v. Williams, 597 So.2d 275 (Fla.1992) renders any procedural error harmless, see § 59.041, Fla.Stat. (1991), and the nunc pro tunc order permissible, the order below is
Affirmed.