Case Name: Steven WIERZBA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. QUALITY LOAN SERVICE, CORPORATION; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-03-08
Citations: 419 F. App'x 727
Docket Number: No. 10-16034
Parties: Steven WIERZBA, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. QUALITY LOAN SERVICE, CORPORATION; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 419
Pages: 727–728

Head Matter:
Steven WIERZBA, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. QUALITY LOAN SERVICE, CORPORATION; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
No. 10-16034.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 15, 2011.
Filed March 8, 2011.
Steven Wierzba, Oakland, CA, pro se.
Renee Reyes De Golier, Seth Michael Harris, McCarthy & Holthus, San Diego, CA, Theodore E. Bacon, Esquire, Patrick A. Cathcart, Esquire, Adorno Yoss Alvarado & Smith, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Steven Wierzba appeals pro se from the district court's order dismissing his action arising out of foreclosure proceedings. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
The district court dismissed two claims in Wierzba's amended complaint without prejudice and granted leave to amend. Rather than filing a second amended complaint or obtaining a final order of dismissal from the district court, Wierzba filed a notice of appeal. We therefore lack jurisdiction. See WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136-37 (9th Cir.1997) (en banc) (a dismissal with leave to amend is not a final order).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.