Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. C. Keith LaMONDA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-02-03
Citations: 455 F. App'x 930
Docket Number: No. 11-13012
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. C. Keith LaMONDA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before BARKETT, PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 455
Pages: 930–930

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. C. Keith LaMONDA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-13012
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Feb. 3, 2012.
Peggy Morris Ronca, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Nicole M. Andrejko, Karen L. Gable, I. Randall Gold, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Orlando, FL, David Ignall, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Robert E. O’Neill, David Paul Rhodes, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
H. Kyle Fletcher, Office of H. Kyle Fletcher, for Defendant-Appellant.
C. Keith LaMonda, Butner, NC, pro se.
Before BARKETT, PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Kyle Fletcher, appointed counsel for C. Keith LaMonda in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, the district court's denial of LaMonda's motion for miscellaneous relief and its final judgment of forfeiture are AFFIRMED, and La-Monda's motion for the appointment of new counsel is DENIED.