Case Name: STATE SECURITIES COMPANY, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Nebraska, Appellant, v. FEDERATED MUTUAL IMPLEMENT AND HARDWARE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, and admitted to do business in the State of Nebraska, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1962-10-09
Citations: 308 F.2d 452
Docket Number: No. 16880
Parties: STATE SECURITIES COMPANY, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Nebraska, Appellant, v. FEDERATED MUTUAL IMPLEMENT AND HARDWARE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, and admitted to do business in the State of Nebraska, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 308
Pages: 452–452

Head Matter:
STATE SECURITIES COMPANY, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Nebraska, Appellant, v. FEDERATED MUTUAL IMPLEMENT AND HARDWARE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, and admitted to do business in the State of Nebraska, Appellee.
No. 16880.
United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.
Oct. 9, 1962.
Fred J. Patz, Lincoln, Neb., made argument for the appellant and Sterling F. Mutz, Lincoln, Neb., was on the brief.
F. B. Baylor, Lincoln, Neb., made argument for the appellee and Baylor, Evnen, Baylor & Urbom by F. B. Baylor, Lincoln, Neb., was on the brief.
Before SANBORN and BLACKMUN, Circuit Judges, and REGISTER, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the judgment for the defendant (appellee) in this diversity case governed by Nebraska law and tried to Judge John W. Delehant without a jury. He has written an exhaustive opinion, reported in D.C., 204 F.Supp. 207, to which we can add nothing. That opinion and the briefs of the parties have convinced us that the judgment appealed from represents, at the very least, a permissible conclusion with respect to a doubtful question of Nebraska law, which this Court will not reverse. Homolla v. Gluck, 8 Cir., 248 F.2d 731, 733; Weiby v. Farmers Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 8 Cir., 273 F.2d 327, 331; Village of Brooten v. Cudahy Packing Company, 8 Cir., 291 F.2d 284, 301.
Affirmed.