Case Name: Richard Joseph RAMSEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patricia R. STANSBERRY, Respondent-Appellee, and United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-12-19
Citations: 258 F. App'x 607
Docket Number: No. 07-7168
Parties: Richard Joseph RAMSEY, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Patricia R. STANSBERRY, Respondent—Appellee, and United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, Respondent.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 258
Pages: 607–607

Head Matter:
Richard Joseph RAMSEY, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Patricia R. STANSBERRY, Respondent—Appellee, and United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, Respondent.
No. 07-7168.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 13, 2007.
Decided: Dec. 19, 2007.
Richard Joseph Ramsey, Appellant Pro Se. Steve R. Matheny, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Richard Joseph Ramsey, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition and subsequent Fed. R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ramsey v. Stansberry, No. 5:06-hc-02187-D (E.D.N.C. July 18, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.