Case Name: Elisha HAM, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1973-10-19
Citations: 484 F.2d 1382
Docket Number: No. 73-2175
Parties: Elisha HAM, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 484
Pages: 1382–1382

Head Matter:
Elisha HAM, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 73-2175.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Oct. 19, 1973.
Barry Scott Richard, Arnold R. Ginsberg, Asst. Attys. Gen., Miami, Fla., for respondent-appellee.
Before BELL, GODBOLD and GEE, •Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The decision of the District Court denying habeas relief for failure to exhaust state remedies is affirmed. Cf., on the merits, Tollett v. Henderson, 411 U.S. 258, 93 S.Ct. 1602, 36 L.Ed.2d 235 (1973).
. It is appropriate to dispose of this pro se case summarily, pursuant to this Court's Local Rule 9(c)(2), appellant having failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Kimbrough v. Beto, Director, 5 Cir., 1969, 412 F.2d 981.