Case Name: F. R. E., INC., a Florida corporation, Apellant, v. CITY OF BOCA RATON, Florida, a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Florida, and Myron B. Phipps, et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1973-08-15
Citations: 283 So. 2d 48
Docket Number: No. 72-917
Parties: F. R. E., INC., a Florida corporation, Apellant, v. CITY OF BOCA RATON, Florida, a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Florida, and Myron B. Phipps, et al., Appellees.
Judges: OWEN, C. J., and WALDEN and CROSS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 283
Pages: 48–49

Head Matter:
F. R. E., INC., a Florida corporation, Apellant, v. CITY OF BOCA RATON, Florida, a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Florida, and Myron B. Phipps, et al., Appellees.
No. 72-917.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Aug. 15, 1973.
Rehearing Denied Sept. 17, 1973.
Evelyn R. Flack of Law Offices of Evelyn R. Flack and Sales, Metzger & Christiansen, Palm Beach, for appellant.
Jerome F. Skrandel, City Atty., Boca Raton, Malcolm Anderson, West Palm Beach, and Gerald E. Dwyer of Hallman, Meeker & Sanson, Boca Raton, for appel-lees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The plaintiff property owner filed an action challenging the validity of a zon ing ordinance. The effort was rejected and we approve the findings and decision of the trial court and say that no reversible error has been demonstrated.
Additionally, we are of the opinion that the property owner had such notice and forewarning of the pending enactment of the ordinance, — coupled with the conduct of the owner, — as would prevent it from invoking equitable estoppel against the defendant City. See City of Ft. Lauderdale v. Lauderdale Industrial Sites, Fla.App.1957, 97 So.2d 47; Sharrow v. City of Dania, Fla.1955, 83 So.2d 274.
Affirmed.
OWEN, C. J., and WALDEN and CROSS, JJ., concur.