Case Name: Martin MADORSKY, et al., Appellants, v. Marcelino REGALADO, et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-02-14
Citations: 667 So. 2d 1007
Docket Number: No. 95-1723
Parties: Martin MADORSKY, et al., Appellants, v. Marcelino REGALADO, et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and GODERICH, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 667
Pages: 1007–1007

Head Matter:
Martin MADORSKY, et al., Appellants, v. Marcelino REGALADO, et al., Appellees.
No. 95-1723.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 14, 1996.
Raymond L. Robinson, Miami, for appellants.
Lionel Barnet, Miami, for appellees.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and GODERICH, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The plaintiffs below, Martin Madorsky, et al., appeal from an order granting final summary judgment in favor of the individual defendants, Marcelino Regalado, Carmen Re-galado, and Delio Trejo. After carefully reviewing the record, we find that the existence of conflicting affidavits demonstrates that genuine issues of material fact remain to be resolved by the fact-finder and that these issues preclude entry of summary judgment. Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.510; Watson v. Hahn, 664 So.2d 1083 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Goodman v. Anthony, 269 So.2d 756 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972). Therefore, we reverse.
Reversed and remanded.