Case Name: MARGARET STEINMETZ, RESPONDENT, v. SNEAD & COMPANY, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1940-04-25
Citations: 124 N.J.L. 450
Docket Number: 
Parties: MARGARET STEINMETZ, RESPONDENT, v. SNEAD & COMPANY, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 124
Pages: 450–450

Head Matter:
MARGARET STEINMETZ, RESPONDENT, v. SNEAD & COMPANY, APPELLANT.
Submitted February 16, 1940
Decided April 25, 1940.
For the appellant, Kellogg & Chance.
For the respondent, William T. Cahill.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court and reported in 123 N. J. L. 497.
For affirmance—The Chief Justice, Case, Donges, Heher, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.