Case Name: Martinho De Joao ROCHA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dora SCHRIRO; et al., Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-12-29
Citations: 216 F. App'x 637
Docket Number: No. 06-15505
Parties: Martinho De Joao ROCHA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dora SCHRIRO; et al., Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 216
Pages: 637–638

Head Matter:
Martinho De Joao ROCHA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dora SCHRIRO; et al., Respondents-Appellees.
No. 06-15505.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 21, 2006 .
Filed Dec. 29, 2006.
Martinho De Joao Rocha, Buckeye, AZ, pro se.
Diane M. Acosta, Esq., Office of the Arizona Attorney General, Phoenix, AZ, for Respondents-Appellees.
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Martinho de Joao Rocha appeals pro se from the portion of the district court's March 1, 2006, interlocutory order that denies his motion for reconsideration. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. See Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp., 485 U.S. 271, 276, 108 S.Ct. 1133, 99 L.Ed.2d 296 (1988).
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.