Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gerald Lamont STEELE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-08-05
Citations: 330 F. App'x 427
Docket Number: No. 09-6719
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Gerald Lamont STEELE, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 330
Pages: 427–428

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Gerald Lamont STEELE, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 09-6719.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 30, 2009.
Decided: Aug. 5, 2009.
Gerald Lamont Steele, Appellant Pro Se. William A. Brafford, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina; Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Jill Westmoreland Rose, Office of the United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Gerald Lamont Steele appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See United States v. Hood, 556 F.3d 226, 232-33 (4th Cir.2009). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Steele, No. 3:01-cr-00216-MR-11 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 6, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the deci-sional process.
AFFIRMED.