Case Name: GEORGE FROST CO. v. FRANKENSTEIN et al.
Court: United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1902-02-17
Citations: 114 F. 1021
Docket Number: 
Parties: GEORGE FROST CO. v. FRANKENSTEIN et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter
Volume: 114
Pages: 1021–1021

Head Matter:
GEORGE FROST CO. v. FRANKENSTEIN et al.
(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.
February 17, 1902.)
A. D. Salinger and Charles Noave, for the motion. Edmund Wetmore, opposed.

Opinion:
LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.
The defendants have satisfactorily explained the presence of the patent mark on the metal work of some of their goods. Having brought all of these into court, the bits of metal may be removed from the supporters and kept in the clerk's office, to be disposed of at final hearing. Following Judge Coxe's decision (112 Fed. 1009), preliminary injunction may issue.