Case Name: George KNIEST, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2014-06-03
Citations: 441 S.W.3d 152
Docket Number: No. ED 100261
Parties: George KNIEST, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: BEFORE ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 441
Pages: 152–152

Head Matter:
George KNIEST, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 100261.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
June 3, 2014.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 7, 2014.
Application for Transfer Denied Sept. 30, 2014.
George Kniest, Jefferson City, Missouri, pro se for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Adam Rowley, Jefferson City, Missouri, for Respondent.
BEFORE ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
George M. Kniest ("Appellant") appeals from the motion court's judgment, following Appellant's plea of guilty, dismissing his successive Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief, which Appellant termed as an "Original Petition" seeking to vacate, set aside or correct the judgment or sentence. Appellant pled guilty to first-degree assault and armed criminal action on January 10, 2002, admitting facts involving Appellant shooting at his wife with a pistol. He was sentenced to two consecutive terms of 20 years' imprisonment.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 84.16(b)(2); Rule 29.15(k). No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).