Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Anthony Pascale, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1980-01-03
Citations: 48 N.Y.2d 997
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Pascale, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 48
Pages: 997–998

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Pascale, Appellant.
Argued December 11, 1979;
decided January 3, 1980
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
S. Simpson Gray and Louis A. Garcia for appellant.
Mario Merola, District Attorney (Cary W. Sucoff and Alan D. Marrus of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The argument that the defendant should be relieved of his guilty plea was not raised by motion in the court of first instance prior to conviction and therefore has not been preserved for our review (People v Bell, 47 NY2d 839; People v Adams, 46 NY2d 1047). The denials of his postconviction motions are not before us on this appeal.
With respect to the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, raised for the first time on appeal, there is nothing apparent in this record which would support this contention.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.