Case Name: Stephen W. Duncomb, Adm'r, vs. James S. Richards et al.
Court: Kalamazoo Circuit Court
Jurisdiction: Michigan
Decision Date: 1884
Citations: 1 Howell N.P. 274
Docket Number: 
Parties: Stephen W. Duncomb, Adm’r, vs. James S. Richards et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Michigan nisi prius cases, decided by the state and federal courts in Michigan
Volume: 1
Pages: 274–274

Head Matter:
Kalamazoo Circuit — In Chancery.
Stephen W. Duncomb, Adm’r, vs. James S. Richards et al.
Injunction — Prayer for Injunction in Bill.
There was. a prayer for injunction in the bill, but none in the prayer for process.
The injunction having been allowed, a motion was made to dissolve it on the ground that no prayer for an injunction was contained in the prayer for process.
B. F. Heelcert, Spafford Tryon and Joslyn & Freeman for Complainants.
F. J. Atwell and II. F. Severans for Defendant.
This is a highly interesting ease. Complainant finally obtained a decree in the cause, which was brought to set aside certain assignments made by an uncle in his dotage to his nephew. Hon. C. 1. Walker succeeded Mr. Severans as Counsel for Defendant in the Supreme Court. (46 Mich., 166.)

Opinion:
The Court,
Hawes, J.:
Held that while this was a good ground for refusing an injunction, it was not for a dissolution thereof.
Taylor et al. vs. Snyder et. al., Walker's Chan., 490.