Case Name: STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Appellant, v. William EADES and Cheryl Eades, his wife, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1980-05-27
Citations: 383 So. 2d 973
Docket Number: No. 79-1046
Parties: STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Appellant, v. William EADES and Cheryl Eades, his wife, Appellees.
Judges: Before BARKDULL and BASKIN, JJ., and EZELL, BOYCE F., JR., (Ret.), Associate Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 383
Pages: 973–974

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Appellant, v. William EADES and Cheryl Eades, his wife, Appellees.
No. 79-1046.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 27, 1980.
Vernis & Bowling and Richard N. Blank, Miami, for appellant.
Headley & Headley, Daniels & Hicks and Sam Daniels, Miami, for appellees.
Before BARKDULL and BASKIN, JJ., and EZELL, BOYCE F., JR., (Ret.), Associate Judge.

Opinion:
BARKDULL, Judge.
We affirm a final judgment rendered on a jury verdict for a police officer, who was injured when he fell through a drainage grading on the shoulder of a public roadway owned by the State of Florida, Department of Transportation, while writing an accident report.
A review of authorities in Florida pertaining to governmental liability for injuries to persons on a public right-of-way reveals none pertaining to liability of the State. It would appear the dearth of cases is due to the State's sovereign immunity, which has just recently been waived. However, those cases involving municipal liability can now be used as an analogy. Therefore, this case will be affirmed on the following authorities: City of Tallahassee v. Coles, 148 Fla. 606, 4 So.2d 874 (1941); Leialoha v. City of Jacksonville, 64 So.2d 924 (Fla.1953); Gordon v. City of West Palm Beach, 321 So.2d 78 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); 16 Fla.Jur., Highways, Streets, and Bridges, § 111; 39 Am.Jur.2d, Highways, Streets, and Bridges, § 488.
Therefore, the final judgment under review be and the same is hereby affirmed.
Affirmed.