Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Charles MCCLINTON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-02-23
Citations: 421 F. App'x 310
Docket Number: No. 10-7287
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Charles MCCLINTON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 421
Pages: 310–310

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Charles MCCLINTON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-7287.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 28, 2011.
Decided: Feb. 23, 2011.
David Charles McClinton, Appellant Pro Se. Anne. Magee Tompkins, United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
David Charles McClinton appeals the district court's order construing McClin-ton's petition for a writ of error coram nobis as a 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2010) motion and denying it as successive and unauthorized. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. McClinton, No. 3:89-cr-00098-FDW-l (W.D.N.C. Aug. 27, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.