Case Name: Edmond E. BRATTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-12-20
Citations: 831 So. 2d 1290
Docket Number: No. 5D01-2666
Parties: Edmond E. BRATTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: THOMPSON, C.J., and SAWAYA, J., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 831
Pages: 1290–1290

Head Matter:
Edmond E. BRATTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D01-2666.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Dec. 20, 2002.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Kevin R. Holtz, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Richard E. Doran, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ann M. Phillips, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Ap-pellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We conclude that any impropriety in the court's exclusion of testimony that the victim engaged in consensual sex in exchange for drugs could not have affected the outcome of the trial. A similar fact witness testified that the defendant had victimized her as well, and her description of the collateral crime was identical to the victim's description of the crime in virtually every detail. Accordingly, the convictions are affirmed. State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).
AFFIRMED.
THOMPSON, C.J., and SAWAYA, J., concur.
SHARP, W., J., concurs in result only.