Case Name: FERGUSON v. FERGUSON
Court: Texas Courts of Civil Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1926-03-25
Citations: 283 S.W. 297
Docket Number: No. 1863
Parties: FERGUSON v. FERGUSON.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 283
Pages: 297–298

Head Matter:
FERGUSON v. FERGUSON.
(No. 1863.)
(Court of Civil Appeals of Texas.- El Paso.
March 25, 1926.)
J. F. 1-Iolt, of Sherman, and Ratliff.& Ratliff, of Haskell, for appellant.
W. H. Murchison and Clyde Grissom, both of Haskell, for appellee.

Opinion:
HIGGINS, J.
Appellee was appointed temporary administrator of the estate of Mrs. Kate F. Morton by the county court of Has-kell county. From the order of appointment appellant appealed to the district court. Ap-pellee moved to dismiss'the appeal upon the ground that the district court had no jurisdiction to review 'the order appealed from. The motion was sustained and the appeal dismissed on May 11, 1925.
Article 3631, R. S. 1911, as amended by chapter 116, Acts 37th Legislature, p. 222 (Vernon's Ann. Civ. St. Supp. 1922, art. 3631), reads:
"Any person who1 may consider himself aggrieved by any decision, order, decree or judg ment of the county court, shall have the right to appeal therefrom to the district court of the county upon complying with the provisions of this chapter; provided that in appeals from orders or judgments, appointing administrators or temporary administrators, the administrators shall continue the prosecution, of suits then pending in favor of the estate, and if on appeal from probate court, a different administrator shall be appointed, he shall be substituted in such case."
Under this act the district court had jurisdiction of the appeal. The court erred in holding to the contrary.
Reversed and remanded.