Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lomus GRACE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 01-6628
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-08-30
Citations: 17 F. App'x 185
Docket Number: 
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lomus GRACE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 01-6628.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 17
Pages: 185–186

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lomus GRACE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 01-6628.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 23, 2001.
Decided Aug. 30, 2001.
Lomus Grace, pro se. Robert Jack Hig-don, Jr., Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte, .NC, for appellee.
Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Lomus Grace appeals the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Grace. Nos. CR-94-109-V; CA-97-240-3-V (W.D.N.C. filed May 28, 1999; entered June 1, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.