Case Name: Dean R. KRETSCHMAR, Petitioner/Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-05-11
Citations: 991 S.W.2d 192
Docket Number: No. 74895
Parties: Dean R. KRETSCHMAR, Petitioner/Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Respondent.
Judges: Before: MARY K. HOFF, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, J., and RHODES RUSSELL, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 991
Pages: 192–192

Head Matter:
Dean R. KRETSCHMAR, Petitioner/Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Respondent.
No. 74895.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
May 11, 1999.
Michael A. Gross, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Evan J. Buchheim, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before: MARY K. HOFF, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, J., and RHODES RUSSELL, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Motorist appeals the trial court's judgment sustaining the Director of Revenue's order revoking his driving privileges. We find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).