Case Name: John D. CADICE, M.D., Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Kathy MAUPIN, M.D., et al., Defendants, and Patrick M. Coyne, M.D., Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-08-25
Citations: 975 S.W.2d 476
Docket Number: No. 71533
Parties: John D. CADICE, M.D., Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Kathy MAUPIN, M.D., et al., Defendants, and Patrick M. Coyne, M.D., Appellant.
Judges: Before CRANE, P.J., and HOFF and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 975
Pages: 476–477

Head Matter:
John D. CADICE, M.D., Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Kathy MAUPIN, M.D., et al., Defendants, and Patrick M. Coyne, M.D., Appellant.
No. 71533.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Aug. 25, 1998.
Timothy W. Kelly, St. Louis, for appellant.
Joseph F. Devereux, Jr., Devereux, Murphy, Striler, Brickey & Sher, L.L.C., St. Louis, for respondent.
Before CRANE, P.J., and HOFF and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Coyne appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict for Cadice in a breach of contract action. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).