Case Name: Randy L. FOX, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2017-02-14
Citations: 209 So. 3d 686
Docket Number: CASE NO. 1D16-1482
Parties: Randy L. FOX, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: B.L. THOMAS, RAY, and OSTERHAUS, JJ, CONCUR.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 209
Pages: 686–686

Head Matter:
Randy L. FOX, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CASE NO. 1D16-1482
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Opinion filed February 14, 2017.
Randy L. Fox, pro se, Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Donna A. Gerace, Assistant Attorney General, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We previously affirmed the summary denial of the appellant's petition for writ of habeas corpus brought pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(m), but retained jurisdiction for consideration of the imposition of sanctions.
The appellant has failed to obtain relief in at least six previous postconviction cases he filed in this court to challenge this judgment and sentence. Due to the appellant's apparent abuse of the legal process by his repeated pro se filings attacking his conviction and sentence, this court issued an order directing him to show cause why he should not be prohibited from future pro se filings. See State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47, 48 (Fla. 1999). The appellant filed a motion for rehearing responding to the order to show cause that does not provide a legal basis to prohibit the imposition of sanctions.
Therefox-e, because the appellant's repeated attacks on his judgment and sentence have become an abuse of the legal process, we hold that he is barred from future pro se filings in this court concerning Bay County Circuit Court case number 87-1854-G. The Clerk of the Court is directed not to accept any future filings concerning this case unless they are filed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar.
B.L. THOMAS, RAY, and OSTERHAUS, JJ, CONCUR.