Case Name: SCHERING CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALPHARMA USPD, INC., Defendant-Appellee; Schering Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Taro Pharmaceutical Usa, Inc., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-06-18
Citations: 102 F. App'x 722
Docket Number: No. 03-1024
Parties: SCHERING CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALPHARMA USPD, INC., Defendant-Appellee. Schering Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Taro Pharmaceutical Usa, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before MAYER, Chief Judge, RADER and DYK, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 102
Pages: 722–722

Head Matter:
SCHERING CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALPHARMA USPD, INC., Defendant-Appellee. Schering Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Taro Pharmaceutical Usa, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 03-1024.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
June 18, 2004.
Anthony Herman, Principal Attorney, Stephen T. Kaminski, Of Counsel, Covington & Burling, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Charles W. Saber, Principal Attorney, Gary M. Hoffman, Jeremy A. Cubert, Of Counsel, Dickstein Shapiro, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before MAYER, Chief Judge, RADER and DYK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
RADER, Circuit Judge.
ORDER
Schering Corporation moves to enter judgment in these two appeals, based on our decision in Schering Corp. v. Geneva Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 339 F.3d 1373 (Fed.Cir.2003). Schering states that Alpharma USPD, Inc. and Taro Pharmaceutical USA, Inc. consent.
Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
The motion to enter judgment is granted. The district court's judgment is affirmed.