Case Name: Leigh Ann PIKE, Appellant, v. Charles G. PIKE, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2005-09-07
Citations: 932 So. 2d 229
Docket Number: No. 4D04-1861
Parties: Leigh Ann PIKE, Appellant, v. Charles G. PIKE, Appellee.
Judges: FARMER, KLEIN and MAY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 932
Pages: 229–230

Head Matter:
Leigh Ann PIKE, Appellant, v. Charles G. PIKE, Appellee.
No. 4D04-1861.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Sept. 7, 2005.
Benjamin T. Hodas of Martin L. Haines, III, Chartered, Lake Park, for appellant.
Sam T. Steger and Karen O’Brien Steger of Steger & Steger, P.A., Stuart, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In a dissolution of marriage case such as this one, in which alimony is required because of the disparity in income between the parties, the court must first determine the amount of alimony and then, considering alimony as income, determine the amount of child support. § 61.30(2)(a)9, Fla. Stat. (2004). Cornett v. Cornett, 713 So.2d 1083 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). In this case the trial court first determined the amount of child support, and then awarded only a dollar a month in permanent alimony. The court did this because it concluded that the mother would be better off if the entire award was child support, which would not be taxable to her. Although it is obvious from the record that the court was attempting to achieve the most beneficial financial result for both parties, the court erred in awarding alimony of only one dollar a month. As the court did in Cornett, we reverse and remand for the court to determine permanent periodic alimony, and' then, taking that amount into account, calculating child support.
FARMER, KLEIN and MAY, JJ., concur.