Case Name: TAYLOR-WHITE EXTRACTING COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION, RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1929-02-04
Citations: 105 N.J.L. 498
Docket Number: 
Parties: TAYLOR-WHITE EXTRACTING COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION, RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 105
Pages: 498–499

Head Matter:
TAYLOR-WHITE EXTRACTING COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION, RESPONDENT.
Argued October 17, 1928
Decided February 4, 1929.
For the appellant, Starr, Summerill & Lloyd.
For the respondent, Edward L. Eatzenbach and Fred W. De Toe.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chahcelloe, Chief Justice, Tbehchaed, Parkeb, Kalisch, Katzehbach, Lloyd, Yah Bus-kirk, McGlehhoh, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 12.
For reversal — Hone.