Case Name: Paul Brown et al., Respondents, v. Two Exchange Plaza Partners, Defendant, and George A. Fuller Company, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Heydt Contracting Corp. et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents; A & M Wallboard Co., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant; Heydt Contracting Corporation, Fourth-Party Plaintiff-Respondent; Walter F. Ulma, Inc., et al., Fourth-Party Defendants-Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1989-11-21
Citations: 74 N.Y.2d 915
Docket Number: 
Parties: Paul Brown et al., Respondents, v Two Exchange Plaza Partners, Defendant, and George A. Fuller Company, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Heydt Contracting Corp. et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents; A & M Wallboard Co., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant; Heydt Contracting Corporation, Fourth-Party Plaintiff-Respondent; Walter F. Ulma, Inc., et al., Fourth-Party Defendants-Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 74
Pages: 915–916

Head Matter:
Paul Brown et al., Respondents, v Two Exchange Plaza Partners, Defendant, and George A. Fuller Company, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Heydt Contracting Corp. et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents; A & M Wallboard Co., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant; Heydt Contracting Corporation, Fourth-Party Plaintiff-Respondent; Walter F. Ulma, Inc., et al., Fourth-Party Defendants-Respondents.
Submitted August 14, 1989;
decided November 21, 1989

Opinion:
Motion for leave to appeal granted. Motion for a stay granted. Motion to strike so much of the submissions of Central Furring and Dry Wall Company as seeks dismissal denied.