Case Name: Eugene A. DOWNEY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2011-01-11
Citations: 329 S.W.3d 405
Docket Number: No. ED 93957
Parties: Eugene A. DOWNEY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before ROY L. RICHTER, C.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 329
Pages: 405–405

Head Matter:
Eugene A. DOWNEY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 93957.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Jan. 11, 2011.
Jo Ann Rotermund, Assistant Public Defender, Public Defenders Office, St. Louis, MO, for movant/appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Mary H. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent/respondent.
Before ROY L. RICHTER, C.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Eugene A. Downey, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).