Case Name: Darren Eugene SHERMAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ernest C. ROE, Warden; California Attorney General; Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-07-16
Citations: 41 F. App'x 914
Docket Number: No. 00-55975; D.C. No. CV-98-00172-AHS
Parties: Darren Eugene SHERMAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ernest C. ROE, Warden; California Attorney General; Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 41
Pages: 914–914

Head Matter:
Darren Eugene SHERMAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ernest C. ROE, Warden; California Attorney General; Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 00-55975.
D.C. No. CV-98-00172-AHS.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 11, 2002.
Decided July 16, 2002.
Before KOZINSKI and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges, and MAHAN, District Judge.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
The Honorable James C. Mahan, United States District Judge for the District of Nevada, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
We affirm the denial of Sherman's habeas petition for reasons stated in Magistrate Judge Zarefsky's Report and Recommendation and adopted by the district court.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.