Case Name: Pietro Benvegna, Respondent, v. United Surety Company, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1909-11-23
Citations: 196 N.Y. 563
Docket Number: 
Parties: Pietro Benveg-na, Respondent, v. United Surety Company, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 196
Pages: 563–564

Head Matter:
Pietro Benveg-na, Respondent, v. United Surety Company, Appellant.
Bemegna v. United Surety Co., 132 App. Div. 925, affirmed.
(Argued October 5, 1909;
decided November 23, 1909.)
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 14, 1909, which' reversed a judgment of Special Term overruling a demurrer to the answer and dismissing the complaint in an action to recover upon a surety bond.
The following question was certified: “ Does the plaintiff's complaint set forth facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action ? ”
Edwin Bhmenstiel for appellant.
Nelson L. Keach for respondent.

Opinion:
Order affirmed, with costs; question certified answered in the affirmative on opinion in case of Musco v. United Surety Co. (196 N. Y. 459).
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Babtlett, Haight, Vann. Willard Bartlett, Hiscook and Chase, JJ.