Case Name: Grant Eugene ERICKSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Angie BOOTH; Debra Cottrell; Teresa Wade; Jim Rubenstein, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-12-02
Citations: 355 F. App'x 678
Docket Number: No. 09-7345
Parties: Grant Eugene ERICKSEN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Angie BOOTH; Debra Cottrell; Teresa Wade; Jim Rubenstein, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 355
Pages: 678–678

Head Matter:
Grant Eugene ERICKSEN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Angie BOOTH; Debra Cottrell; Teresa Wade; Jim Rubenstein, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 09-7345.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 5, 2009.
Decided: Dec. 2, 2009.
Grant Eugene Erieksen, Appellant Pro Se. John Herbert Boothroyd, West Virginia Division of Corrections, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Grant Eugene Erieksen appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ericksen v. Booth, No. 2:08-cv-00104-REM-DJJ, 2009 WL 1974195 (N.D.W.Va. July 7, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.