Case Name: Turney, Exrx., et al. v. Cook, Aud., et al.
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1929-04-03
Citations: 120 Ohio St. 616
Docket Number: No. 21376
Parties: Turney, Exrx., et al. v. Cook, Aud., et al.
Judges: Jones, Matthias and Day, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, New Service
Volume: 120
Pages: 616–616

Head Matter:
Turney, Exrx., et al. v. Cook, Aud., et al.
(No. 21376
Decided April 3, 1929.)
Messrs. Turney & Ripe, for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. Charles B. Cook and Mr. Howard M. Razor, prosecuting attorneys, and Mr. H. J. Redmond, for defendants in error.

Opinion:
It appearing that the judges of the court are equally divided in opinion as to the merits of the case (one of the judges not participating), and are unable for that reason to agree upon a judgment, the entry of this fact constitutes an affirmance of the judgment of the Court of Appeals.
Judgment affirmed.
Jones, Matthias and Day, JJ., concur.
Kinkade, J., not participating.