Case Name: MILLTOWN INDUSTRIAL SITES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOROUGH OF MILLTOWN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1993-06-16
Citations: 15 N.J. Tax 144
Docket Number: 
Parties: MILLTOWN INDUSTRIAL SITES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOROUGH OF MILLTOWN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Tax Court Reports
Volume: 15
Pages: 144–145

Head Matter:
MILLTOWN INDUSTRIAL SITES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOROUGH OF MILLTOWN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Submitted May 3, 1993
Decided June 16, 1993.
Before Judges PETRELLA and KEEFE.
Berger & Bomstein, attorneys for appellant (Robert A Bom-stein, on the brief).
McGimpsey & Cafferty, attorneys for respondent (Thomas J. Cafferty and Arlene M. Turinckak, on the brief).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this appeal from a decision of the Tax Court, Milltown Industrial Sites (Milltown) challenges the determination that N.J.S.A 54:3-27 required it to pay municipal utility charges as part of all municipal charges in addition to real estate taxes before it could maintain a tax appeal.
Milltown contends that the phrase "municipal charges" in the statute was not intended to include electric, sewer and water charges as "municipal charges" within the scope of N.J.S.A. 54:3— 27. It argues that payment of such charges should not be held to be a condition for maintaining a real estate tax appeal. Judge Andrew, in a well-reasoned opinion, concluded that the statute required plaintiff to pay all such municipal charges in addition to real estate taxes before it could maintain a tax appeal.
We affirm substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Andrew in his August 25,1992 opinion, reported at 12 N.J.Tax 581 (Tax 1992).