Case Name: Charles A. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sgt. T. CROSSON; C/O McDonald; C/O Godfrey; Superintendent Ryan; Lt. Burge, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-05-03
Citations: 688 F. App'x 189
Docket Number: No. 16-7231
Parties: Charles A. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sgt. T. CROSSON; C/O McDonald; C/O Godfrey; Superintendent Ryan; Lt. Burge, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 688
Pages: 189–190

Head Matter:
Charles A. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sgt. T. CROSSON; C/O McDonald; C/O Godfrey; Superintendent Ryan; Lt. Burge, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-7231
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 24, 2017
Decided: May 3, 2017
Charles A. Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Vanessa N. Totten, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Ap-pellees.
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Charles A. Williams appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Williams' motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court, Williams v. Crosson, No. 5:14-ct-03308-F (E.D.N.C. Sept. 1, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED