Case Name: Hancock Gross Mfg., Inc. v. United States; Paul Munk & Co., Inc. v. United States
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1968-03-13
Citations: 60 Cust. Ct. 1018
Docket Number: No. P68/144; protests 65/14051 and 65/15607 (Philadelphia); No. P68/145; protests 66/9095 and 66/14250 (New York)
Parties: Hancock Gross Mfg., Inc. v. United States, Paul Munk & Co., Inc. v. United States,
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Volume: 60
Pages: 1018–1019

Head Matter:
No. P68/144.
protests 65/14051 and 65/15607 (Philadelphia).
No. P68/145.
protests 66/9095 and 66/14250 (New York).
Hancock Gross Mfg., Inc. v. United States, Paul Munk & Co., Inc. v. United States,

Opinion:
Ford, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of brass sink strainers similar in all material respects to those the subject of Davies, Turner & Company v. United States (55 Cust. Ct. 48, Abstract 69651), the claim of tire plaintiffs was sustained.