Case Name: Juan BORGES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2007-07-11
Citations: 959 So. 2d 1276
Docket Number: No. 4D06-1736
Parties: Juan BORGES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: GUNTHER, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 959
Pages: 1276–1277

Head Matter:
Juan BORGES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D06-1736.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
July 11, 2007.
Juan Borges, Miami, pro se.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Thomas A. Palmer, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the summary denial of appellant's motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.
Appellant entered a plea of no contest to burglary of a dwelling while armed with a weapon and grand theft. The burglary charge was a first degree felony. See § 810.02(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2006). Appellant complains that his lawyer did not tell him of a possible defense — that the pocket knife he had in his possession at the time of the burglary was not a "dangerous weapon" within the meaning of section 810.02(2)(b). See Arroyo v. State, 564 So.2d 1153 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); L.B. v. State, 700 So.2d 370 (Fla.1997). Appellant claims that had he known of this defense he would have gone to trial instead of accepting the plea. See Grosvenor v. State, 874 So.2d 1176 (Fla.2004). No transcript of the plea colloquy was attached to the circuit court's order denying relief.
On remand, the trial court shall either provide record attachments conclusively refuting appellant's claim or conduct an evidentiary hearing under Grosvenor.
Reversed and remanded.
GUNTHER, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.