Case Name: In the Matter of the Claim of Gary Koslosky, Respondent, v. Ben Paul et al., Doing Business as Good Service Auto Gas Station, et al., Respondents, and Special Disability Fund, Appellant. Workers' Compensation Board, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1994-01-13
Citations: 200 A.D.2d 845
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Claim of Gary Koslosky, Respondent, v Ben Paul et al., Doing Business as Good Service Auto Gas Station, et al., Respondents, and Special Disability Fund, Appellant. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 200
Pages: 845–846

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Claim of Gary Koslosky, Respondent, v Ben Paul et al., Doing Business as Good Service Auto Gas Station, et al., Respondents, and Special Disability Fund, Appellant. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.
[608 NYS2d 877]

Opinion:
—Appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed September 3, 1992, which, inter alia, ruled that the Uninsured Employers' Fund was entitled to reimbursement for those sums attributable to claimant's concurrent employment on the date of his accident.
Contrary to the contention by the Special Disability Fund, the Workers' Compensation Board did not err in concluding that under Workers' Compensation Law § 15 (8) (l) the Uninsured Employers' Fund was entitled to reimbursement for those sums attributable to claimant's concurrent employment on the date of his accident. The Special Disability Fund's remaining arguments on this issue have been considered and rejected as unpersuasive.
Mikoll, J. P., Crew III, White, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.