Case Name: THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. ROBERT McGRATH, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1928-06-22
Citations: 105 N.J.L. 251
Docket Number: 
Parties: THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. ROBERT McGRATH, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 105
Pages: 251–252

Head Matter:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. ROBERT McGRATH, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Argued May 16, 1928
Decided June 22, 1928.
For the plaintiff in error, King & Vogt.
For the defendant in error, Arthur II. Holland.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per euriam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Minturn, Katzenbach, White, Yan Buskirk, MgGlennon, Kays, Dear, JJ. 9.
For reversal — None.