Case Name: Cindy D. SMITH, Appellant, v. Timothy L. SMITH, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-10-14
Citations: 122 S.W.3d 612
Docket Number: No. ED 80725
Parties: Cindy D. SMITH, Appellant, v. Timothy L. SMITH, Respondent.
Judges: Before MARY R. RUSSELL, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J„ and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 122
Pages: 612–613

Head Matter:
Cindy D. SMITH, Appellant, v. Timothy L. SMITH, Respondent.
No. ED 80725.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division three.
Oct. 14, 2003.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court
and Motion to Publish Denied Dec. 10, 2003.
Application for Transfer Denied Jan. 27, 2004.
Lawrence G. Gillespie, Clayton, MO, for appellant.
Steven Cantonwine, Imperial, MO, for respondent.
Before MARY R. RUSSELL, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J„ and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant Cindy D. Smith ('Wife") appeals from the trial court's judgment dissolving the parties' marriage. On appeal, Wife argues the trial court erred in awarding the parties joint legal custody of their three minor children, and ordering that the marital residence be sold because its judgment is unsupported by substantial evidence and a misapplication of the law.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and no error of law appears. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. However, a memorandum has been provided to the parties, for their use only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).