Case Name: XULI ZHANG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Police S. REGAN; Police Pec. M. Green, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-04-30
Citations: 473 F. App'x 306
Docket Number: No. 11-2375
Parties: XULI ZHANG, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Police S. REGAN; Police Pec. M. Green, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 473
Pages: 306–307

Head Matter:
XULI ZHANG, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Police S. REGAN; Police Pec. M. Green, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 11-2375.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 26, 2012.
Decided: April 30, 2012.
Xuli Zhang, Appellant Pro Se. Karen L. Gibbons, County Attorney’s Office, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Xuli Zhang appeals the magistrate judge's order denying her post-judgment motion to correct the clerk's mistake. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Zhang v. Regan, No. 1:10-cv01329-TCB (E.D. Va. filed Dec. 7, 2011 & entered Dec. 8, 2011). We deny Zhang's motions for sanctions and for relief from the judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.