Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Adolfo VALDEZ, a/k/a Adolfo Valdez-Pinales, a/k/a Angel Manuel Rios-Castro, a/k/a Big Al Valdez, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-10-08
Citations: 584 F. App'x 145
Docket Number: No. 14-6315
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Adolfo VALDEZ, a/k/a Adolfo Valdez-Pinales, a/k/a Angel Manuel Rios-Castro, a/k/a Big Al Valdez, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 584
Pages: 145–145

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Adolfo VALDEZ, a/k/a Adolfo Valdez-Pinales, a/k/a Angel Manuel Rios-Castro, a/k/a Big Al Valdez, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 14-6315.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 30, 2014.
Decided: Oct. 8, 2014.
Adolfo Valdez, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Seth Morgan Wood, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Vacated and remanded by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Adolfo Valdez appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012), finding that the drug trafficking offense to which he pled guilty involved more than 8.4 kilograms of crack cocaine. The Government has filed a motion to remand this case to the district court for the court to consider the factual findings made at the original sentencing hearing. We grant the motion, vacate the district court's order, and remand this case to the district court for further proceedings, but we express no opinion on the ultimate outcome of the case. We grant the Government's motion to file a supplemental appendix and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
VACATED AND REMANDED.