Case Name: Michael Antonio ANDERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-06-06
Citations: 761 So. 2d 1162
Docket Number: No. 1D99-3883
Parties: Michael Antonio ANDERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ERVIN, VAN NORTWICK and BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 761
Pages: 1162–1162

Head Matter:
Michael Antonio ANDERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D99-3883.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
June 6, 2000.
Michael Antonio Anderson, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, James W. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court's denial of appellant's motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). In 1985, the trial court would have had jurisdiction to consider and grant appellant's motion filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, challenging the improper stacking of his minimum-mandatory sentences for five counts of robbery with a firearm. See Palmer v. State, 438 So.2d 1 (Fla.1983) (courts may not impose consecutive minimum-mandatory sentences when a firearm is used to commit multiple crimes at the same time and place); Moore v. State, 464 So.2d 1296 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985) (Palmer should be retroactively applied); Bass v. State, 530 So.2d 282 (Fla.1988) (confirming that Palmer applied to sentences imposed prior to Palmer).
AFFIRMED.
ERVIN, VAN NORTWICK and BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR.