Case Name: Lithochrome Corporation, Inc., Respondent, v. Rochester Monotype Composition Co., Inc., et al., Appellants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants. James Lewandowski et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2000-02-16
Citations: 269 A.D.2d 873
Docket Number: 
Parties: Lithochrome Corporation, Inc., Respondent, v Rochester Monotype Composition Co., Inc., et al., Appellants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants. James Lewandowski et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 269
Pages: 873–873

Head Matter:
Lithochrome Corporation, Inc., Respondent, v Rochester Monotype Composition Co., Inc., et al., Appellants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants. James Lewandowski et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents.
[705 NYS2d 481]

Opinion:
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, VanStrydonck, J. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, VanStrydonck, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Hayes, J. P., Wisner, Pigott, Jr., Scudder and Lawton, JJ.