Case Name: JAMES ARNOLD CARR, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada
Jurisdiction: Nevada
Decision Date: 1982-08-27
Citations: 98 Nev. 363
Docket Number: No. 13503
Parties: JAMES ARNOLD CARR, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Nevada Reports
Volume: 98
Pages: 363–364

Head Matter:
JAMES ARNOLD CARR, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.
No. 13503
August 27, 1982
649 P.2d 1357
Morgan D. Harris, Public Defender, and Gary H. Lieberman, Deputy Public Defender, Clark County, for Appellant.
Richard H. Bryan, Attorney General, Carson City; Robert J. Miller, District Attorney, and James Tufteland, Deputy District Attorney, Clark County, for Respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION
Per Curiam:
This is an appeal from an order denying appellant's petition for post-conviction relief. NRS 177.315 et seq. The only issue on appeal is whether the case of Carter v. Kentucky, 450 U.S. 288 (1981), should be given full retroactive application to appellant's conviction.
In Franklin v. State, 98 Nev. 266, 646 P.2d 543 (1982), we held that the Carter decision warrants the same retroactive effect given the analogous rule of Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 (1965). As we noted in Franklin, the Supreme Court has determined that Griffin did not retroactively apply to cases in which the judgment was final on the date of the Griffin decision. See Tehan v. Shott, 382 U.S. 406 (1966). Accordingly, we decline to give Carter full retroactive effect to appellant's final judgment of conviction. We find no error in the district court's order denying post-conviction relief.
Affirmed.