Case Name: BAYSTATE DRYWALL, INC. vs. CHICOPEE SAVINGS BANK
Court: Massachusetts Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: Massachusetts
Decision Date: 1980-12-02
Citations: 1 Mass. Supp. 692
Docket Number: 
Parties: BAYSTATE DRYWALL, INC. vs. CHICOPEE SAVINGS BANK
Judges: Present: McGuane, J., Walsh, J., and Greenberg, J.
Reporter: Massachusetts Reports Supplement
Volume: 1
Pages: 692–693

Head Matter:
BAYSTATE DRYWALL, INC. vs. CHICOPEE SAVINGS BANK
District Court Department Appellate Division, Western District Trial Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
December 2, 1980
Michael G. West for the plaintiff.
Richard A. Corbert for the defendant.
Present: McGuane, J., Walsh, J., and Greenberg, J.

Opinion:
MCGUANE, J.
It appears to this Court that while the arguments urged on us by both the Plaintiff and Defendant are novel and unique they are not persuasive in light of the agreed statements of facts.
The agreed statement No. 4 "On June 29, 1976 Josephine I. Tessier signed and delivered a promissory note and security agreement to Chicopee. The security agreement gave Chicopee a security interest in the 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme, serial number 3J57F6G108815."
We find this agreement to be dispositive of the Plaintiff's arguments that no security interest attached or was enforceable.
Once agreed to by both parties, the losing party cannot then base an appeal on the argument that the agreed facts were not as stipulated.
After considering all the arguments in this matter, we find no prejudicial error by the trial court and the report is to be dismissed.
So ordered.
William T. Walsh, J.
Greenberg, J.
Allan McGuane, J.