Case Name: Michael J. CADELL, Petitioner/Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-01-05
Citations: 983 S.W.2d 207
Docket Number: No. 74196
Parties: Michael J. CADELL, Petitioner/Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent.
Judges: Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, J., and RHODES RUSSELL, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 983
Pages: 207–208

Head Matter:
Michael J. CADELL, Petitioner/Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent.
No. 74196.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Jan. 5, 1999.
Kevin R. Kelly, Hazelwood, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Craig F. Martin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, J., and RHODES RUSSELL, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner appeals the trial court's judgment sustaining the Director of Revenue's order suspending his driving privileges. We find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).