Case Name: Edith DEPEN and Alfred Depen, Complainants-Appellees, v. LAWYERS' TITLE & GUARANTY COMPANY, George S., VanSchaick, as Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York, and Lawyers' County Trust Company of New York, Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1934-08-07
Citations: 72 F.2d 705
Docket Number: No. 420
Parties: Edith DEPEN and Alfred Depen, Complainants-Appellees, v. LAWYERS’ TITLE & GUARANTY COMPANY, George S., VanSchaick, as Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York, and Lawyers’ County Trust Company of New York, Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 72
Pages: 705–705

Head Matter:
Edith DEPEN and Alfred Depen, Complainants-Appellees, v. LAWYERS’ TITLE & GUARANTY COMPANY, George S., VanSchaick, as Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York, and Lawyers’ County Trust Company of New York, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 420.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Aug. 7, 1934.
Greenbaum, Wolf & Ernst, of New York City (Lawrence S. Greenbaum, Morris L. Ernst, Samuel J. Schur, Theodore S. Jaffin, and Philip Levy, all of New York City, of counsel), for appellant George S. Van Schaick, Superintendent of Insurance of New York, as Rehabilitate of Lawyers’ Title & Guaranty Co.
Joseph Nemerov, of New York City (Joseph Nemerov and Maurice J. Dix, both of New York City, of counsel), for eoinplainants-appellees and Bainbridge Colby, Edwin L. Garvin, John M. McGrath, and Nathan D. Shapiro, trustees.
Before MANTON, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.
Writ of certiorari denied 55 S. Ct. 216, 79 L. Ed. —.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
It seems unnecessary to develop the law and facts applicable io this appeal in a separate opinion after what we have already said in Tolfree v. New York Title & Mortgage Co. et al., 72 F.(2d) 702 and Jacoby et al. v. Bond & Mortgage Guarantee Co. et al., 72 F.(2d) 420, the opinions in which are filed herewith. The principles announced in those decisions govern the present case, and the order granting a preliminary injunction and appointing temporary trustees is accordingly reversed, and the bill of complaint is ordered dismissed.