Case Name: Raymond Olstza et al. v. Robert H. Fenton et al.
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1989-06-16
Citations: 19 Conn. App. 802
Docket Number: 7091
Parties: Raymond Olstza et al. v. Robert H. Fenton et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Appellate Reports
Volume: 19
Pages: 802–802

Head Matter:
Raymond Olstza et al. v. Robert H. Fenton et al.
(7091)
Borden, Spallone and Daly, Js.
Argued May 4 —
decision released June 16, 1989
Richard A. Fuchs, for the appellants (plaintiffs).
Agnes M. Cahill, with whom, on the brief, was Michael P. Del Sole, for the appellees (defendants).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The plaintiffs have appealed from the judgment rendered in favor of the defendants in this medical malpractice action. The sole issue raised is whether the trial court correctly charged the jury on the foreseeability of harm. The charge given by the trial court in this case comports with the charge on foreseeability of harm approved by our Supreme Court in Pisel v. Stamford Hospital, 180 Conn. 314, 331-32, 430 A.2d 1 (1980).
There is no error.