Case Name: Milton LIFSCHITZ and Old Republic Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Filomena TROCCOLI and Emilio Troccoli, her husband, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1983-07-05
Citations: 436 So. 2d 951
Docket Number: No. 82-507
Parties: Milton LIFSCHITZ and Old Republic Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Filomena TROCCOLI and Emilio Troccoli, her husband, Appellees.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 436
Pages: 951–951

Head Matter:
Milton LIFSCHITZ and Old Republic Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Filomena TROCCOLI and Emilio Troccoli, her husband, Appellees.
No. 82-507.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 5, 1983.
Rehearing Denied Sept. 21, 1983.
Robert A. Glassman, Miami, for appellants.
Keyfetz, Poses & Halpern and Jay Hal-pern, Miami, for appellees.
Before BARKDULL, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the jury verdict and judgment entered thereon upon a holding that (1) the visibility of the danger Troccoli encountered and whether she used due care under the circumstances are issues properly left for the jury, see City of Jacksonville v. Stokes, 74 So.2d 278 (Fla.1954); Brown v. McArthur Dairies, Inc., 280 So.2d 520 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); Bryant v. Florida Inland Theatres, Inc., 274 So.2d 249 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973), and (2) Lifschitz has failed to meet his burden of demonstrating prejudicial error regarding comments of the trial court, see Thompson v. Martin, 216 So.2d 67 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968).
Affirmed.