Case Name: King Edward BRILL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1977-10-24
Citations: 350 So. 2d 1141
Docket Number: No. GG-177
Parties: King Edward BRILL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: MILLS, Acting C. J., and SMITH and MELVIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 350
Pages: 1141–1142

Head Matter:
King Edward BRILL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. GG-177.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Oct. 24, 1977.
King Edward Brill, in pro per.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Patti Englander, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant could have raised his complaint concerning the jury instructions on direct appeal. That issue is therefore not properly raised in a motion to vacate judgment and sentence. Ashley v. State, 350 So.2d 839 (Fla.1st DCA 1977).
AFFIRMED.
MILLS, Acting C. J., and SMITH and MELVIN, JJ., concur.