Case Name: WOODWARD et v. HAFELY
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1935-11-08
Citations: 20 Ohio Law Abs. 256
Docket Number: No 760
Parties: WOODWARD et v HAFELY
Judges: FUNK, PJ, and STEVENS, J, concur in judgment.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 20
Pages: 256–256

Head Matter:
WOODWARD et v HAFELY
Ohio Appeals, 9th Dist, Lorain Co
No 760.
Decided Nov 8, 1935
William G. Wickens, Lorain, for plaintiffs in error.
G. A. Resek, Lorain, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
OPINION
By WASHBURN, J.
Counsel are familiar with the facts in this case and the questions involved, and we shall conserve time by not making any statement with reierence thereto.
We hold that, under the statutes of the state, the Common Pleas Court of Lorain County had jurisdiction, on appeal from the judgment rendered in this case in the Municipal Court of the city of Lorain, and fhat the law with reference to appeals from justice of the peace courts applies to the procedure in perfecting such appeal.
We have read and considered the evidence taken upon the trial of the case in the Common Pleas Court, and are of the opinion that the judgment of said court is not manifestly against the weight of the evidence; and our investigation of cite record leads us to the conclusion that there was no prejudicial error committed in the trial of the case.
The judgment of the Common Pleas Court is therefore affirmed.
FUNK, PJ, and STEVENS, J, concur in judgment.