Case Name: Eugenia B. WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FAIRFAX COUNTY GOVERNMENT, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-02-23
Citations: 367 F. App'x 466
Docket Number: No. 09-1059
Parties: Eugenia B. WHITE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. FAIRFAX COUNTY GOVERNMENT, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 367
Pages: 466–467

Head Matter:
Eugenia B. WHITE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. FAIRFAX COUNTY GOVERNMENT, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 09-1059.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 18, 2010.
Decided: Feb. 23, 2010.
Eugenia B. White, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Eugenia B. White appeals the district court's order denying her second motion to reconsider its order dismissing her em ployment discrimination complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons slated by the district court. White v. Fairfax County Gov't, No. 1:08-cv-01110-LMB-TRJ (E.D.Va. filed Dec. 9 & entered Dec. 10, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.