Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. CONRAD HANCKE, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1991-01-23
Citations: 105 Or. App. 398
Docket Number: 88 CR 0548; CA A63015
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. CONRAD HANCKE, Appellant.
Judges: Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 105
Pages: 398–399

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted December 21, 1990,
conviction affirmed, probation condition 2 vacated; remanded for resentencing January 23, 1991
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. CONRAD HANCKE, Appellant.
(88 CR 0548; CA A63015)
803 P2d 784
Jesse Wm. Barton, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem.
Janet A. Klapstein, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.
Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
The trial court imposed a condition of probation that defendant submit his "person, residence, vehicle or property to a search by a Probation officer." The condition was not limited to searches based on "reasonable grounds to believe such search will disclose evidence of a probation violation," as required by ORS 137.540. The state concedes that the condition is invalid, and we agree.
Conviction affirmed; probation condition 2 vacated; remanded for resentencing.