Case Name: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Shakir BERRYHILL, Petitioner
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2018-01-30
Citations: 180 A.3d 365
Docket Number: No. 439 EAL 2017
Parties: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent
v.
Shakir BERRYHILL, Petitioner
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 180
Pages: 365–365

Head Matter:
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent
v.
Shakir BERRYHILL, Petitioner
No. 439 EAL 2017
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
January 30, 2018
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 30th day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
Did not the Superior Court panel err in reversing the trial court's dismissal of the case pursuant to Rule 600 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedure where the panel instantly failed to apply this Court's holding in Commonwealth v. Mills, 162 A.3d 323 (Pa. 2017) that time attributable to the normal progression of a case is not delay excludable from calculations under Rule 600?