Case Name: Charles SWIFT Plaintiff-Appellant v. WALMART Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-10-06
Citations: 658 F. App'x 831
Docket Number: No. 16-2145
Parties: Charles SWIFT Plaintiff-Appellant v. WALMART Defendant-Appellee
Judges: Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 658
Pages: 831–831

Head Matter:
Charles SWIFT Plaintiff-Appellant v. WALMART Defendant-Appellee
No. 16-2145
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: October 3, 2016
Filed: October 6, 2016
Charles Swift, Pro Se
Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Charles Swift appeals the district court's preservice dismissal without prejudice of his pro se diversity complaint. The court dismissed the complaint after Swift failed to comply with the court's order to provide evidence of damages sufficient to invoke diversity jurisdiction. Having carefully considered the record, and given the without-prejudice nature of the dismissal, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing without prejudice.
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.