Case Name: Hermina Garson, Appellant, v. Lowell S. Rapping, as Executor of Percy Garson, Deceased, et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1985-12-17
Citations: 66 N.Y.2d 928
Docket Number: 
Parties: Hermina Garson, Appellant, v Lowell S. Rapping, as Executor of Percy Garson, Deceased, et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 66
Pages: 928–931

Head Matter:
Hermina Garson, Appellant, v Lowell S. Rapping, as Executor of Percy Garson, Deceased, et al., Respondents.
Argued November 13, 1985;
decided December 17, 1985
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
John R. Kelligrew, Cornelius D. Murray and Salvatore D. Ferlazzo for appellant.
Jonathan Lovett for Lowell S. Rapping, as Executor of Percy Garson, deceased, respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (105 AD2d 726). We add only that the cpurt properly applied the limited exception to the rule of strict compliance with the requirements of the Business Corporation Law (see, e.g., Matter of Rye Psychiatric Hosp. Center, 66 NY2d 333) recognized in Zion v Kurtz (50 NY2d 92, 102, rearg denied 50 NY2d 1060).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander. Taking no part: Judge Titone.