Case Name: FRANCIS TATE, Administrator of the Estate of George S. Tate, Deceased, Respondent, v. E. R. SHAW, Appellant
Court: Utah Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Utah
Decision Date: 1909-02-02
Citations: 35 Utah 240
Docket Number: No. 1982
Parties: FRANCIS TATE, Administrator of the Estate of George S. Tate, Deceased, Respondent, v. E. R. SHAW, Appellant.
Judges: STRATJP, C. J., and McCARTY, J., concur.
Reporter: Utah Reports
Volume: 35
Pages: 240–241

Head Matter:
FRANCIS TATE, Administrator of the Estate of George S. Tate, Deceased, Respondent, v. E. R. SHAW, Appellant.
No. 1982.
Decided February 2, 1909
(99 Pac. 1007).
Appeal from District Court, Second District. Hon. J. A. Howell, Judge.
Action by Francis Tate, administrator, against E. R. Shaw. From the judgment, defendant appeals.
Affirmed.
0. B. Hollingsworth and J. N. Kimball for appellant.
H. H. Henderson for respondent.

Opinion:
FRICK, J.
This appeal involves practically tbe same questions that were presented in tbe case of Tate v. Rose, 35 Utah 229, 99 Pac. 1003, which precedes this one. Tbe difference between tbe two cases is that in tbe preceding case tbe west half of tbe southwest quarter of section 18, township 7, range 1 west, Salt Lake meridian, was in issue, while in this tbe west half of tbe northwest quarter of tbe same section, township', and range is tbe-subject-matter of litigation. Both pieces of land are included in the patent referred to- in tbe preceding case. Tbe other difference is that in this ease tbe statute of limitations was not pleaded. Upon tbe authority of tbe preceding case, tbe judgment in this case is affirmed, with costs to respondent.
STRATJP, C. J., and McCARTY, J., concur.