Case Name: Ruth Bates PROCK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1997-07-16
Citations: 696 So. 2d 1293
Docket Number: No. 95-04353
Parties: Ruth Bates PROCK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and LAZZARA and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 696
Pages: 1293–1294

Head Matter:
Ruth Bates PROCK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 95-04353.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
July 16, 1997.
James Marion Moorman, Pubhc Defender, and Jeffrey M. Pearlman, Assistant Pubhc Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ronald Napolitano, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for AppeUee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Ruth Bates Prock pleaded nolo contendere to the manufacture of cannabis and was sentenced to eighteen months probation. We have reviewed this ease according to our obhgation under In re Anders Briefs, 581 So.2d 149 (Fla.1991), and affirm Prock's judgment. We strike from her sentence, however, the $2 cost imposed pursuant to section 943.25(13), Florida Statutes (1993), because it was not orally imposed at the sentencing hearing. See Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111, 117 (Fla. 2d DCA1995).
Affirmed as modified.
SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and LAZZARA and QUINCE, JJ., concur.