Case Name: Ole K. NILSSEN, Plaintiff, and Geo Foundation, Ltd., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendant-Appellee, and Costco Wholesale Corp., DefendantAppellee, and Menard, Inc., Ace Hardware Corp., Truserv Corporation, and Home Depot, Inc., Defendants, and Lowe's Home Centers, Inc., Defendant-Appellee, and Ikea Illinois, LLC, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-08-22
Citations: 426 F. App'x 918
Docket Number: No. 2010-1139
Parties: Ole K. NILSSEN, Plaintiff, and Geo Foundation, Ltd., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendant-Appellee, and Costco Wholesale Corp., DefendantAppellee, and Menard, Inc., Ace Hardware Corp., Truserv Corporation, and Home Depot, Inc., Defendants, and Lowe’s Home Centers, Inc., Defendant-Appellee, and Ikea Illinois, LLC, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 426
Pages: 918–918

Head Matter:
Ole K. NILSSEN, Plaintiff, and Geo Foundation, Ltd., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendant-Appellee, and Costco Wholesale Corp., DefendantAppellee, and Menard, Inc., Ace Hardware Corp., Truserv Corporation, and Home Depot, Inc., Defendants, and Lowe’s Home Centers, Inc., Defendant-Appellee, and Ikea Illinois, LLC, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 2010-1139.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Aug. 22, 2011.
Leland W. Hutchinson Jr., Jonathan Hill, Freeborn & Peters, LLP, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Anthony J. Fitzpatrick, Christopher S. Kroon, Duane Morris LLP, Gary William Smith, Posternak Blanstein & Lund, LLP, Boston, MA, Margaret M. Duncan, McDermott, Will & Emery, Kimball R. Anderson, Kathleen B. Barry, Aesha Pallesen, Winston & Strawn LLP, Chicago, IL, Bureden J. Warren, McDermott, Will & Emery, Washington, DC, for Defendants-Appellees.

Opinion:
ON MOTION
ORDER
Upon consideration of the parties' supplemental filings regarding Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co., — F.3d -, 2011 WL 2028255 (Fed.Cir.2011),
It Is Ordered That:
(1) The stay of proceedings is lifted.
(2) The case will be placed on the next available oral argument calendar.
(3) The parties' supplemental briefings shall be transmitted to the merits panel assigned to the appeal.