Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Anthony Stevens, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1991-12-24
Citations: 178 A.D.2d 338
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Stevens, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 178
Pages: 338–339

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Stevens, Appellant.

Opinion:
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Frank Torres, J.), rendered on June 1, 1990, convicting defendant, upon a plea of guilty of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and attempted robbery in the first degree, and sentencing defen dant to concurrent indeterminate terms of imprisonment of 3Vi to 7 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.
We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction", we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. (People v Farrar, 52 NY2d 302, 305.)
Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and within statutory guidelines. "Having received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms." (People v Felman, 141 AD2d 889, 890, lv denied 72 NY2d 918.) Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Kupferman, Smith and Rubin, JJ.