Case Name: Khitam Mohammed ABUSHANDI, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-01-27
Citations: 164 F. App'x 634
Docket Number: No. 05-73041
Parties: Khitam Mohammed ABUSHANDI, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: T.G. NELSON, SILVERMAN and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 164
Pages: 634–635

Head Matter:
Khitam Mohammed ABUSHANDI, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 05-73041.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 23, 2006.
Decided Jan. 27, 2006.
Michael Franquinha, Law Office of Michael Franquinha, Phoenix, AZ, for Petitioner.
Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, District Director, Office of the District Chief Counsel U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Carol Federighi, Esq., M. Jocelyn Wright, Esq., DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: T.G. NELSON, SILVERMAN and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Respondent's unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 698 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard); see also Garcia-Ramirez v. Gonzales, 428 F.3d 935 (9th Cir.2005) (rejecting a constitutional challenge to the continuous physical presence requirement of cancellation of removal). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.
All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publi cation and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.