Case Name: Stephen E. MCCLELLAND, Party in Interest-Appellant, and Allen McRae; Charles Stevenson; Patrick Lahens; Dennis Blyden; David Evick, Jr.; Rashid Qawi Al-Amin, Plaintiffs, v. Gene M. JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellee. United States of America, Movant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-05-20
Citations: 131 F. App'x 940
Docket Number: No. 04-7787
Parties: Stephen E. MCCLELLAND, Party in Interest—Appellant, and Allen McRae; Charles Stevenson; Patrick Lahens; Dennis Blyden; David Evick, Jr.; Rashid Qawi Al-Amin, Plaintiffs, v. Gene M. JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellee. United States of America, Movant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 131
Pages: 940–940

Head Matter:
Stephen E. MCCLELLAND, Party in Interest—Appellant, and Allen McRae; Charles Stevenson; Patrick Lahens; Dennis Blyden; David Evick, Jr.; Rashid Qawi Al-Amin, Plaintiffs, v. Gene M. JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellee. United States of America, Movant.
No. 04-7787.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 4, 2005.
Decided May 20, 2005.
Stephen E. McClelland, Appellant pro se. Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Stephen E. McClelland seeks to appeal the magistrate judge's order denying his motion for a temporary restraining order. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order McClelland seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Office of Pers. Mgmt. v. Am. Fed'n of Gov't Employees, 473 U.S. 1301, 1303-04, 105 S.Ct. 3467, 87 L.Ed.2d 603 (1985); Drudge v. McKernon, 482 F.2d 1375, 1376 (4th Cir.1973). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED