Case Name: Keith Alan LASKO, Reverend Doctor, Minister of Worldwide Ministries of Jesus Christ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William C. ROBERTS; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-04-25
Citations: 690 F. App'x 466
Docket Number: No. 16-15455
Parties: Keith Alan LASKO, Reverend Doctor, Minister of Worldwide Ministries of Jesus Christ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William C. ROBERTS; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 690
Pages: 466–467

Head Matter:
Keith Alan LASKO, Reverend Doctor, Minister of Worldwide Ministries of Jesus Christ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William C. ROBERTS; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-15455
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 11, 2017
Filed April 25, 2017
Keith Alan Lasko, Pro Se
Lindsay Demaree, Ballard Spahr LLP, Las Vegas, NV, Paul Lantieri, III, Ballard Spahr LLP, Philadelphia, PA, Defendant-Appellee
Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Keith Alan Lasko appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing as duplicative his action alleging violations of federal and state law. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion, Adams v. Cal. Dep't of Health Servs., 487 F.3d 684, 688 (9th Cir. 2007), overruled on other grounds by Taylor v. Sturgell, 553 U.S. 880, 904, 128 S.Ct. 2161, 171 L.Ed.2d 155 (2008), and we may affirm on any basis supported by the record, Johnson v. Riverside Healthcare System, LP, 534 F.3d 1116, 1121 (9th Cir. 2008). We affirm.
Dismissal of Lasko's action was proper on the basis of issue preclusion because the issue of whether the allegedly defamatory statements were false was actually litigated and decided against Lasko in a prior action, Lasko v. Am. Bd. of Surgery, Inc., No. 2:13-cv-01893-JAD-NJK (D. Nev. Dec. 14, 2015). See Taylor, 553 U.S. at 892, 128 S.Ct. 2161 (setting forth elements of issue preclusion).
We reject as meritless Lasko's contention that he was held to a higher pleading standard as a pro se litigant.
We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).
AFFIRMED.
xhis disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.