Case Name: Robert D. CUMMINGS, Appellant, v. Nicole CUMMINGS, Appellee.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2018-10-31
Citations: 257 So. 3d 143
Docket Number: No. 4D18-456
Parties: Robert D. CUMMINGS, Appellant,
v.
Nicole CUMMINGS, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 257
Pages: 143–143

Head Matter:
Robert D. CUMMINGS, Appellant,
v.
Nicole CUMMINGS, Appellee.
No. 4D18-456
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
[October 31, 2018]
Robert D. Cummings, North Port, pro se.
No appearance for appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee , 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) ("When there are issues of fact the appellant necessarily asks the reviewing court to draw conclusions about the evidence. Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory. Without knowing the factual context, neither can an appellate court reasonably conclude that the trial judge so misconceived the law as to require reversal.").
Warner, May and Forst, JJ., concur.