Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Barry Lernard DAVIS, also known as Sir Lewis, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-05-03
Citations: 544 F. App'x 344
Docket Number: No. 12-20302
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Barry Lernard DAVIS, also known as Sir Lewis, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before JONES, DENNIS, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 544
Pages: 344–345

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Barry Lernard DAVIS, also known as Sir Lewis, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-20302
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
May 3, 2013.
James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Dallas Craig Hughes, Esq., Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before JONES, DENNIS, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Barry Lernard Davis appeals from the judgment entered following his resen-tencing. He was convicted of sex trafficking of children, transportation of a minor with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity, and coercion and enticement to engage a person in prostitution or other criminal sexual activity. We affirmed the conviction and vacated the sentence in part because the district court erroneously imposed a two-level multiple count adjustment to Davis's offense level, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2G1.3(d)(l). We affirmed the imposition of a five-level adjustment pursuant to § 4B1.5(b)(l) because Davis engaged in a pattern of activity involving prohibited sexual conduct with minors.
On appeal from his resentencing, Davis contends solely that the district court erred by imposing the five-level adjustment for engaging in a pattern of prohibited sexual behavior with a minor. He construes this court's previous opinion as allowing him to offer evidence to rebut the presumption of correctness he alleges is given to presentence reports. Because we affirmed the five-level adjustment in the previous appeal, Davis was barred from relitigating that issue in the district court. See United States v. Lee, 358 F.3d 315, 320-21 (5th Cir.2004); United States v. Marmolejo, 139 F.3d 528, 531 (5th Cir.1998) (Marmolejo II).
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.