Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Albert RANDOLPH, a/k/a Spo, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-09-11
Citations: 478 F. App'x 16
Docket Number: No. 12-6800
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Albert RANDOLPH, a/k/a Spo, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 478
Pages: 16–17

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Albert RANDOLPH, a/k/a Spo, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-6800.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 28, 2012.
Decided: Sept. 11, 2012.
Albert Randolph, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Sinclair Duffey, Robert E. Trono, Assistant United States Attorneys, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Albert Randolph appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Randolph, No. 3:01-cr-00304-JRS-11 (E.D.Va. Apr. 13, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.