Case Name: Bayles v. Welsh et al.
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1920-05-18
Citations: 101 Ohio St. 521
Docket Number: No. 16483
Parties: Bayles v. Welsh et al.
Judges: Nichols, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Johnson, Wanamaker, Robinson and Merrell, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, New Service
Volume: 101
Pages: 521–521

Head Matter:
Bayles v. Welsh et al.
Supreme court — Affirmances'—Weight of evidence — Rule 19 of supreme court.
(No. 16483
Decided May 18, 1920.)
Error to the Court of Appeals of Licking county.
Messrs. Jones & Jones, for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. Kibler & Kibler, for defendants in error.

Opinion:
It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said court of appeals be and the same is hereby affirmed; for the reason that the court of appeals upon hearing, found that its former decree was not induced or procured by means of fraud, and the only question presented by the record in this case involves a consideration of the weight of the evidence.
Judgment affirmed.
Nichols, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Johnson, Wanamaker, Robinson and Merrell, JJ., concur.