Case Name: M. L. BICKART vs. F. & F. SCHAEFER BREWING CO.
Court: Connecticut Superior Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1935-01-21
Citations: 1 Conn. Supp. 3
Docket Number: File #43019
Parties: M. L. BICKART vs. F. & F. SCHAEFER BREWING CO.
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Supplement
Volume: 1
Pages: 3–3

Head Matter:
M. L. BICKART vs. F. & F. SCHAEFER BREWING CO.
Superior Court Fairfield County
File #43019
Present: Hon. CARL FOSTER, Judge.
Cummings & Lockwood, Attorneys for the Plaintiff.
Mernstein & Weisman, Attorneys for the Defendant.
MEMORANDUM FILED JANUARY 21, 1935.

Opinion:
FOSTER, J.
To paraphrase the words of the Court in Dawson vs. Orange, 78 Conn. 96, 101, these allegations tend to put the defendant's defenses more fully and plainly before the Court and it is within its rights, although not strictly necessary, to state them in that manner.
The motion to expunge is denied.