Case Name: HODGES v. SEABOARD LOAN AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED, et al.
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1939-11-03
Citations: 61 Ga. App. 443
Docket Number: 27639
Parties: HODGES v. SEABOARD LOAN AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED, et al.
Judges: MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 61
Pages: 443–444

Head Matter:
27639.
HODGES v. SEABOARD LOAN AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED, et al.
Decided November 3, 1939.
Rehearing denied December 19, 1939.
G. Seals Aiken, for plaintiff.
J ohn M. Slaton, J ames J. Slaton, for defendants.

Opinion:
-Brolles, O. J.
Dr. J. H. Hodges sued Seaboard Loan & Savings Association Inc. and G. F. Langran for damages for alleged personal injuries to plaintiff's wife and for the destruction of his automobile. The petition alleged that the damages sued for were caused by a collision between plaintiff's automobile, driven by himself, and in which his wife was riding as a guest, and an automobile owned by the defendant association and which was being operated by the defendant Langran. The petition alleged that the collision ivas caused by the negligence of Langran and set forth the particulars of his alleged negligence. On the trial the evidence showed that Langran was an employee of the defendant association, but it also -shoAved without contradiction that the collision occurred on a Sunday, that the defendant association Avas not conducting any business on that day, and that Langran had express orders from his superior officer of said association not to drive the car on Sundays, and that he was operating it on the Sunday in question without the knowledge of the defendant association and contrary to its order. Under these circumstances the court properly directed a verdict in favor of the defendant association. The various interlocutory rulings on the trial .of the case, which are assigned as error, show no cause for a-reversal of the judgment.
Judgment affirmed.
MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.
On motion for rehearing the foregoing opinion was substituted for the original opinion, and the motion denied.