Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Carl Russo, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1998-05-26
Citations: 250 A.D.2d 867
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carl Russo, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 250
Pages: 867–867

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carl Russo, Appellant.
[672 NYS2d 786]

Opinion:
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Eng, J.), rendered July 7, 1995, convicting him of attempted burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant's assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).
The defendant has failed to raise any nonfrivolous issues in his supplemental pro se brief. Mangano, P. J., Miller, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.