Case Name: In re the Marriage of Jacqueline MACKMAN-YATES, Petitioner/Respondent, v. James Milne YATES, Respondent/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2008-10-14
Citations: 266 S.W.3d 328
Docket Number: No. ED 90706
Parties: In re the Marriage of Jacqueline MACKMAN-YATES, Petitioner/Respondent, v. James Milne YATES, Respondent/Appellant.
Judges: Before BOOKER T. SHAW, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and MARY K. HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 266
Pages: 328–329

Head Matter:
In re the Marriage of Jacqueline MACKMAN-YATES, Petitioner/Respondent, v. James Milne YATES, Respondent/Appellant.
No. ED 90706.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Oct. 14, 2008.
Deborah Moron Henry, Harold Vincent O’Rourke, co-counsel, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Theodore Dennis Dearing, Clayton, MO, for respondent.
Before BOOKER T. SHAW, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and MARY K. HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
James Milne Yates (Appellant) appeals the trial court's judgment entered in favor of Jacqueline Mackman-Yates (Respondent). Appellant raises three points of error on appeal. We have reviewed the briefs and the record, and we conclude that the trial court did not err. No prece-dential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).