Case Name: Marvin LAMPLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-05-02
Citations: 19 S.W.3d 695
Docket Number: No. ED 76375
Parties: Marvin LAMPLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 19
Pages: 695–695

Head Matter:
Marvin LAMPLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 76375.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
May 2, 2000.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied June 14, 2000.
Raymund J. Capelovitch, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Krista D. Boston, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Marvin Lampley (Movant) appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion on the merits without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the exclusive use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).