Case Name: STATE of Missouri, ex rel. John STEELE, Timothy Arnold, Lester Sewald, Rick Lemar, Don Lassing, Conrad Aubuchon, Randy Church, Mark Maples and Dennis Self, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. THE CITY OF FESTUS, a Municipal Corporation, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-09-21
Citations: 2 S.W.3d 848
Docket Number: No. ED 75670
Parties: STATE of Missouri, ex rel. John STEELE, Timothy Arnold, Lester Sewald, Rick Lemar, Don Lassing, Conrad Aubuchon, Randy Church, Mark Maples and Dennis Self, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. THE CITY OF FESTUS, a Municipal Corporation, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, P.J., KENT E. KAROHL, and MARY K. HOFF. JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 2
Pages: 848–849

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, ex rel. John STEELE, Timothy Arnold, Lester Sewald, Rick Lemar, Don Lassing, Conrad Aubuchon, Randy Church, Mark Maples and Dennis Self, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. THE CITY OF FESTUS, a Municipal Corporation, Defendant/Respondent.
No. ED 75670.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Sept. 21, 1999.
Rick Barry, St. Louis, for appellants.
William C. Dodson & Kurt D. Breeze, Hillsboro, for respondent.
Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, P.J., KENT E. KAROHL, and MARY K. HOFF. JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiffs-police officers appeal from the grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant-city on their action to recover additional wages for work performed.
We have reviewed the record on appeal and find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. A written opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).