Case Name: IN RE: Herman Eugene PAULSON, Eugene Paulson Debtor. Herman Eugene Paulson Appellant v. Daniel McDermott; Sunflour Railroad, Inc. Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-09-08
Citations: 697 F. App'x 468
Docket Number: No. 17-1093
Parties: IN RE: Herman Eugene PAULSON, Eugene Paulson Debtor Herman Eugene Paulson Appellant v. Daniel McDermott; Sunflour Railroad, Inc. Appellees
Judges: Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 697
Pages: 468–469

Head Matter:
IN RE: Herman Eugene PAULSON, Eugene Paulson Debtor Herman Eugene Paulson Appellant v. Daniel McDermott; Sunflour Railroad, Inc. Appellees
No. 17-1093
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: September 5, 2017
Filed: September 8, 2017
Herman Eugene Paulson, Pro Se
Colin Kreuziger, Trial Attorney, U.S. Trustee’s Office, Minneapolis, MN, John Postulka, U.S. Department of Justice, Executive Office for United States Trustees, Office of General Counsel, Washington, DC, James L. Snyder, U.S. Trustee’s Office, Des Moines, IA, for Appellee Daniel McDermott
Brian James Donahoe, Donahoe Law Firm, Sioux Falls, SD, Colin Kreuziger, Trial Attorney, U.S. Trustee’s Office, Minneapolis, MN, James L. Snyder, U.S. Trustee’s Office, Des Moines, IA, for Ap-pellee Sunflour Railroad, Inc.
Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Herman Paulson appeals after the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel affirmed the bankruptcy court's denial of his post-judgment motions in his Chapter 13 bankruptcy case. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties' arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See In re Vote, 276 F.3d 1024, 1026 (8th Cir. 2002) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Charles L. Nail, Jr., Chief Judge, United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of South Dakota.