Case Name: Wisconsin v. Minnesota et al.
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1965-12-06
Citations: 382 U.S. 935
Docket Number: No. 21
Parties: Wisconsin v. Minnesota et al.
Judges: The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice Fortas are of the opinion that the motion for leave to file the bill of complaint should be set for oral argument. Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 382
Pages: 935–935

Head Matter:
No. 21,
Original.
Wisconsin v. Minnesota et al.
Bronson C. La Follette, Attorney General of Wisconsin, John H. Bowers, Deputy Attorney General, and A. J. Feijarek and Roy G. Tulane, Assistant Attorneys General, for plaintiff.
Robert W. Mattson, Attorney General of Minnesota, and Perry Voidness, Deputy Attorney General, for defendant State of Minnesota.
Randall J. LeBoeuf, Jr., and Arthur R. Renquist for defendant Northern States Power Co.

Opinion:
Motion for leave to file bill of complaint denied.
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice Fortas are of the opinion that the motion for leave to file the bill of complaint should be set for oral argument. Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.