Case Name: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Fidel SANTIAGO, Appellant
Court: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1982-11-05
Citations: 306 Pa. Super. 176
Docket Number: Appeal No. 416
Parties: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Fidel SANTIAGO, Appellant.
Judges: Before SPAETH, BECK and LIPEZ, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania Superior Court Reports
Volume: 306
Pages: 176–177

Head Matter:
452 A.2d 272
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Fidel SANTIAGO, Appellant.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
Submitted Nov. 5, 1981.
Filed Nov. 5, 1982.
Peter V. Marks, Sr., Philadelphia, for appellant.
Jane C. Greenspan, Assistant District Attorney, Philadelphia, for Commonwealth, appellee.
Before SPAETH, BECK and LIPEZ, JJ.

Opinion:
OPINION PER CURIAM:
On appellant's petition, No. 416, Philadelphia, 1981, filed after submission of this appeal, and agreed to by the Commonwealth, we remand so that there may be a hearing on post-trial motions based upon after-discovered evidence. This remand is without prejudice to appellant being able to raise, on a future appeal, after the after-discovered evidence issue has been litigated in the lower court, the same issues he has raised on this appeal.
Appellant's petition for remand is granted and the record on this appeal is remanded to the lower court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. We do not retain jurisdiction.