Case Name: Edgar NUMRICH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-01-15
Citations: 54 F. App'x 472
Docket Number: No. 02-35295; D.C. No. CV-01-00532-ST
Parties: Edgar NUMRICH, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 54
Pages: 472–473

Head Matter:
Edgar NUMRICH, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 02-35295.
D.C. No. CV-01-00532-ST.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 13, 2003.
Decided Jan. 15, 2003.
Before BEEZER, KLEINFELD and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument; therefore, we deny Numrich's request for oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Edgar Numrich appeals pro se the district court's judgment dismissing his Federal Torts Claim Act action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Orsay v. U.S. Dep't of Justice, 289 F.3d 1125, 1128 (9th Cir.2002), and we affirm.
Numrich's first amended complaint alleged that the Postal Service entered into a contract with his former spouse to build a post office. During an ensuing contract dispute with Numrich's former spouse, the Postal Service made misrepresentations and took other actions that interfered with Numrich's rights under a separate contract he had with his former spouse to act as a real estate investment advisor. The district court properly dismissed Numrich's action because Numrich failed to show an explicit waiver of sovereign immunity. See 28 U.S.C. 2680(h) (preserving sovereign immunity for actions arising out of interference with contractual rights); Dorking Genetics v. United States, 76 F.3d 1261, 1264 (2d Cir.1996); Mt. Homes, Inc. v. United States, 912 F.2d 352, 356 (9th Cir.1990) (holding that court looks beyond plaintiffs characterization to the underlying conduct in determining whether section 2680(h) applies).
Numrich's remaining contentions lack merit.
, , . Appellee s motion tor judicial notice is granted.
AFFIRMED
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.