Case Name: Robert Lee ALEXANDER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-12-26
Citations: 571 So. 2d 122
Docket Number: No. 90-479
Parties: Robert Lee ALEXANDER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and COPE, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 571
Pages: 122–122

Head Matter:
Robert Lee ALEXANDER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 90-479.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 26, 1990.
Robert Lee Alexander, in pro. per.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Patricia Ann Ash, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and COPE, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
As the matters contained in appellant Robert Lee Alexander's post-conviction motion were not cognizable under Rule 3.800(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, the motion was correctly denied, and would have been long ago time barred if asserted by motion under Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
Affirmed.