Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Irie BROOKINS, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-10-23
Citations: 58 S.W.3d 896
Docket Number: No. ED 78883
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Irie BROOKINS, Appellant.
Judges: Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 58
Pages: 896–896

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Irie BROOKINS, Appellant.
No. ED 78883.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Oct. 23, 2001.
Kent Denzel, Assistant Public Defender, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Irie Brookins (Defendant) appeals from the judgment entered following his conviction for three counts of sale of a controlled substance, Section 195.211, RSMo 2000, in a bench-tried case. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find sufficient evidence to support Defendant's conviction. State v. Grim, 854 S.W.2d 403, 405 (Mo. banc 1993). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).