Case Name: STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. MELANIE KRAMER, Defendant
Court: Montana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Montana
Decision Date: 2009-10-09
Citations: 354 Mont. 66
Docket Number: CAUSE NO. DC-08-067
Parties: STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. MELANIE KRAMER, Defendant,
Judges: Chairperson, Hon. Stewart Stadler, Member, Hon. Blair Jones and Member, Hon. Richard Simonton.
Reporter: Montana Reports
Volume: 354
Pages: 66–67

Head Matter:
From: The District Court of the 4th Judicial District. County of Missoula.
STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. MELANIE KRAMER, Defendant,
CAUSE NO. DC-08-067 DECISION

Opinion:
On April 30,2009, the defendant was sentenced to twenty (20) years in the Montana Women's Prison, with ten (10) years suspended, for violation of the conditions of a deferred sentence, for the offense of Forgery, a felony. Defendant shall not be considered for parole until she has completed all programs as recommended by the initial classification board.
On October 9, 2009, the defendant's application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
The defendant was present and was represented by Kris Copenhaver. The state was not represented.
Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that she understood this and stated that she wished to proceed.
Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that "the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive." (§46-18-904(3), MCA).
The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.
Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.
Done in open Court this 9th day of October, 2009.
DATED this 23rd day of October, 2009.
Chairperson, Hon. Stewart Stadler, Member, Hon. Blair Jones and Member, Hon. Richard Simonton.