Case Name: James L. SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2016-02-23
Citations: 482 S.W.3d 470
Docket Number: No. ED 102228
Parties: James L. SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 482
Pages: 470–471

Head Matter:
James L. SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 102228
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Filed: February 23, 2016
Andrew E. Zleit, Missouri Public Defender Office, 1010 Market St., Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Robert Jefferson Bartholomew, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box-899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for Respondent.
Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
James Scott appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-convic tion relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).