Case Name: In The Interest of E. W., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1980-02-15
Citations: 379 So. 2d 1028
Docket Number: Nos. OO-336, OO-337
Parties: In The Interest of E. W., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: McCORD and BOOTH, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 379
Pages: 1028–1029

Head Matter:
In The Interest of E. W., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Nos. OO-336, OO-337.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Feb. 15, 1980.
Michael J. Minerva, Public Defender; Steven H. Parton, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Wallace E. All-britton and A. S. Johnston, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.

Opinion:
MILLS, Chief Judge.
Delinquency petitions were filed charging E. W., a juvenile, with a burglary, the theft of a calculator, and the theft of a bicycle. We find the challenge to the disposition of the first two charges to be without merit, but we reverse as to the theft of the bicycle.
The evidence established that a bicycle was missing and that the juvenile owner named in the amended petition and his mother identified a bicycle which had been recovered by the police. The evidence also established that E. W. returned home one evening with a bicycle which his mother testified was not his. There was, however, no evidence whatsoever establishing that the specific bicycle found in E. W.'s possession was the bicycle identified by the other boy and his mother. Thus, we agree with appellant's contention that the judge should have granted the motion for judgment of acquittal as to the theft of the bicycle.
AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part.
McCORD and BOOTH, JJ., concur.