Case Name: FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL OF SAN FERNANDO VALLEY; The Fair Housing Council of San Diego, individually and on behalf of the General Public, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ROOMMATES.COM, LLC, Defendant-Appellee; Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley; The Fair Housing Council of San Diego, individually and on behalf of the General Public, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Roommate.com, LLC, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-10-12
Citations: 506 F.3d 716
Docket Number: Nos. 04-56916, 04-57173
Parties: FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL OF SAN FERNANDO VALLEY; The Fair Housing Council of San Diego, individually and on behalf of the General Public, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ROOMMATES.COM, LLC, Defendant-Appellee. Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley; The Fair Housing Council of San Diego, individually and on behalf of the General Public, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Roommate.com, LLC, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: MARY M. SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 506
Pages: 716–716

Head Matter:
FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL OF SAN FERNANDO VALLEY; The Fair Housing Council of San Diego, individually and on behalf of the General Public, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ROOMMATES.COM, LLC, Defendant-Appellee. Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley; The Fair Housing Council of San Diego, individually and on behalf of the General Public, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Roommate.com, LLC, Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 04-56916, 04-57173.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Oct. 12, 2007.
Christopher Brancart, Esq., Michael Evans, Esq., Brancart & Brancart, Pescade-ro, CA, Gary W. Rhoades, Esq., Law Office of Gary Rhoades, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
Timothy L. Alger, Esq., Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP, Los An-geles, CA, for Defendanh-Appellee.
Before: MARY M. SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
. Judge Pregerson is recused.