Case Name: Javier DIAZ-BEY; Stephanie Shackleford, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Corporal W. HILL; Sgt. Mark E. Webb; Newport News Police Department, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-06-20
Citations: 435 F. App'x 228
Docket Number: No. 11-1487
Parties: Javier DIAZ-BEY; Stephanie Shackleford, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Corporal W. HILL; Sgt. Mark E. Webb; Newport News Police Department, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 435
Pages: 228–229

Head Matter:
Javier DIAZ-BEY; Stephanie Shackleford, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Corporal W. HILL; Sgt. Mark E. Webb; Newport News Police Department, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 11-1487.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 16, 2011.
Decided: June 20, 2011.
Javier Diaz-Bey, Stephanie Shackleford, Appellants pro se.
Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Javier Diaz-Bey and Stephanie Shackle-ford appeal the district court's order dismissing their complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2006) for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Diaz-Bey v. Hill, No. 4:11-cv-00064-RAJ-FBS (E.D.Va. Apr. 19, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.