Case Name: Okamoto, dba Supreme Auto Leasing v. Bank West Corp., Morters v. Barr et al., Smith v. Rudicel et al., Conic v. Michigan, Westbury v. Dorchester County, South Carolina, et al., Rutan v. Houk, Warden, Smith v. Consolidated Freightways, Stevens v. State Bar of California, Taylor v. Potter, Postmaster General, Roush v. Chalkey, In re Rodriguez
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-11-14
Citations: 546 U.S. 1025
Docket Number: No. 04-1571; No. 04-1621; No. 04-9928; No. 04-10116; No. 04-10389; No. 04-10504; No. 05-4; No. 05-28; No. 05-35; No. 05-132; No. 05-154
Parties: Okamoto, dba Supreme Auto Leasing v. Bank West Corp., Morters v. Barr et al., Smith v. Rudicel et al., Conic v. Michigan, Westbury v. Dorchester County, South Carolina, et al., Rutan v. Houk, Warden, Smith v. Consolidated Freightways, Stevens v. State Bar of California, Taylor v. Potter, Postmaster General, Roush v. Chalkey, In re Rodriguez,
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 546
Pages: 1025–1026

Head Matter:
No. 04-1571.
No. 04-1621.
No. 04-9928.
No. 04-10116.
Okamoto, dba Supreme Auto Leasing v. Bank West Corp., Morters v. Barr et al., Smith v. Rudicel et al., Conic v. Michigan, Westbury v. Dorchester County, South Carolina, et al., Rutan v. Houk, Warden, Smith v. Consolidated Freightways, Stevens v. State Bar of California, Taylor v. Potter, Postmaster General, Roush v. Chalkey, In re Rodriguez,

Opinion:
ante, p. 818; ante, p. 820; ante, p. 831; ante, p. 837; ante, p. 849; ante, p. 855; ante, p. 869; ante, p. 870; ante, p. 871; ante, p. 875; and ante, p. 810^ Petitions for rehearing denied.
No. 04-10389.
No. 04-10504.
No. 05-4.
No. 05-28.
No. 05-35.
No. 05-132.
No. 05-154.