Case Name: Frank L. Finlaw, Respondent, v. Maurice Wertheim et al., Co-partners under the Firm Name of Wertheim & Co., et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Another
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1936-10-20
Citations: 272 N.Y. 550
Docket Number: 
Parties: Frank L. Finlaw, Respondent, v. Maurice Wertheim et al., Co-partners under the Firm Name of Wertheim & Co., et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Another.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 272
Pages: 550–551

Head Matter:
Frank L. Finlaw, Respondent, v. Maurice Wertheim et al., Co-partners under the Firm Name of Wertheim & Co., et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Another.
(Argued September 30, 1936;
decided October 20, 1936.)
Lionel S. Popkin for appellants.
S. Harry Eilenberg and Harold F. Levin for respondent.

Opinion:
Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the negative. Johnston v. Trask (116 N. Y. 136) has not been overruled or modified by DeWaal v. Jamison (226 N. Y. 644). (See, also, Hyman-Michaels Co. v. Senior & Palmer, Inc., 265 N. Y. 266.) No opinion.
Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O'Brien, Htjbbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.