Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George P. SMITH, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-03-01
Citations: 513 F. App'x 263
Docket Number: No. 12-8049
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George P. SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 513
Pages: 263–263

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George P. SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-8049.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 26, 2013.
Decided: March 1, 2013.
George P. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Erik Sean Siebert, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appel-lee.
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
George P. Smith appeals the district court's order denying his motion to reconsider the district court's previous order denying Smith's 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Smith, No. 3:00-er-00343-JRS-1 (E.D.Va. Nov. 8, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.