Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roberto HERNANDEZ-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-08-20
Citations: 538 F. App'x 827
Docket Number: No. 12-50473
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roberto HERNANDEZ-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 538
Pages: 827–827

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roberto HERNANDEZ-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-50473.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 1, 2013.
Filed Aug. 20, 2013.
Benjamin Holley, Scott Michael Lesow-itz, Christopher Seth Askins, Bruce R. Castetter, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
John Paul Balazs, Law Offices of John P. Balazs, Sacramento, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: GRABER, WARDLAW, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Roberto Hernandez-Hernandez appeals from the district court's judgment and challenges the 55-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing Hernandez's 55-month sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). The above-Guidelines sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances. See id.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.