Case Name: In re WEBB et al.
Court: United States District Court for the District of Kentucky
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1872
Citations: 29 F. Cas. 494
Docket Number: 
Parties: In re WEBB et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Cases
Volume: 29
Pages: 494–495

Head Matter:
Case Wo. 17,315.
In re WEBB et al.
[6 N. B. R. 302.]
District Court, D. Kentucky.
1872.
Bankkcptct — Assignee’s Liabimtt foii Rent.
A landlord’s right to rent, against the bankrupt’s estate, expires on tire day of adjudication. If the assignee occupy the premises after that day, he. and not tbe estate, is liable for the rent; when, however, his occupancy is for the benefit of the estate, he will be credited by the rent he is obliged to pay.
[Cited in Bailey v. Loeb, Case No. 739; Re Hufnagel, Id. 6,837.]
[Cited in Deane v. Caldwell. 127 Mass. 244; Abbott v. Stearns, 139 Mass. 170, 20 N. E. 379.]
The bankrupt held n lease from Gustavus Schurman’s estate, now in the hands of Robert Cochran, as receiver, by order of the Louisville chancery court, at an annual rental of two-thousand seven hundred dollars, which lease expires on the first day of July, eighteen hundred and seventy-two. J. C. Webb A Co. were forced into bankruptcy on the ninth day of October, eighteen hundred and seventy-one. and the assignee took possession of the leased premises, and held the same up to (January thirteenth. eighteen hundred and seventy-two. for the purpose of selling off the stock on hand, at which time the assignee paid all rent to January thirteenth, eighteen hundred and seventy-two, and offered to surrender the premises m the landlord, which surrender the landlord accepted, with the express understanding that he claimed the rent for the full term of the lease up to July first, eighteen hundred and seventy-two. The landlord afterwards rented the premises to another tenant at four hundred and fifty-nvo dollars and fifty cents less than J. C. Webb & Co. had agreed to pay to July first, eighteen hundred and seventy-two. The case came up in an agreed statement of facts. The landlord claimed a lien under the statute laws of Kentucky, which give the landlord a lien on the property of the tenant or sub-tenant on the leased premises for twelve months’ rent, due or to become due. The assignee claimed that he had a right under the bankrupt act to surrender the lease, and that neither the as-signee nor the bankrupt’s estate were liable to pay the sum of four hundred and fifty-two dollars and fifty cents, claimed by the landlord.
[Reprinted by permission.]

Opinion:
BALLARD, District Judge.
I am induced to the opinion that under the bankrupt act the landlord's right to rent against the bankrupt's estate expires on the day of the adjudication. If the assignee occupy the premises after that day, he, and not the estate, is liable for the rent. But, of course, when his occupancy is for the benefit of the estate, and is in fact beneficial, he will be credited by the rent which he is obliged to pay. In this case the rent should be paid to January thirteenth, eighteen hundred and seventy-two, and no longer.