Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ahmad Rennick, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2014-12-31
Citations: 123 A.D.3d 1146
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ahmad Rennick, Appellant.
Judges: Eng, P.J., Rivera, Austin, Cohen and Barros, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 123
Pages: 1146–1147

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ahmad Rennick, Appellant.
[997 NYS2d 637]

Opinion:
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Murphy, J), imposed November 30, 2012, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant's waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133 [2014]), and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).
Eng, P.J., Rivera, Austin, Cohen and Barros, JJ., concur.