Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark S. BUFFORD, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-10-02
Citations: 479 F. App'x 518
Docket Number: No. 12-6907
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark S. BUFFORD, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 479
Pages: 518–519

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark S. BUFFORD, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-6907.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 27, 2012.
Decided: Oct. 2, 2012.
Mark S. Bufford, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro Tayman, Howard Jacob Zlotnick, Assistant United States Attorneys, Newport News, Virginia, for Appel-lee.
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Mark S. Bufford, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Bufford, No. 4:07-cr-00066-RAJ-JEB-1 (E.D.Va. filed Feb. 27 & entered Feb. 29, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.