Case Name: Steven Raynor, Respondent, v. HK Systems, Inc., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2006-06-13
Citations: 30 A.D.3d 226
Docket Number: 
Parties: Steven Raynor, Respondent, v HK Systems, Inc., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 30
Pages: 226–226

Head Matter:
Steven Raynor, Respondent, v HK Systems, Inc., Appellant.
[815 NYS2d 825]

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Jane Goodman, J.), entered January 31, 2006, which denied defendant's motion to change venue from New York County to Dutchess County, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The motion was properly denied for failure to demonstrate the materiality of the anticipated testimony of the witnesses on whose convenience the motion is based (see Cardona v Aggressive Heating, 180 AD2d 572, 572 [1992]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.E, Andrias, Nardelli, Gonzalez and Malone, JJ.