Case Name: Gross v. Lockwood Folding Box Corp., Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1971-06-01
Citations: 443 Pa. 159
Docket Number: Appeals, Nos. 421 and 422
Parties: Gross v. Lockwood Folding Box Corp., Appellant.
Judges: Before Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O’Brien, Roberts and Pomeroy, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 443
Pages: 159–161

Head Matter:
Gross v. Lockwood Folding Box Corp., Appellant.
Argued November 12, 1970.
Before Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O’Brien, Roberts and Pomeroy, JJ.
William J. O’Brien, with him Pepper, Hamilton & Scheetz, for appellant.
Jack J. Bernstein, with him B. Nathaniel Richter, and Richter, Syken, Ross, Binder & O’Neill, for appellees.
John W. Kormes, for appellee.
June 1, 1971:

Opinion:
Opinion
per Curiam,
The jury verdicts in favor of one of four similarly situated plaintiffs and in favor of defendant with respect to the other three plaintiffs, two of whom suffered undisputed property damage, are inconsistent ver diets justifying a new trial as to all. See Thompson v. Iannuzzi, 403 Pa. 329, 169 A. 2d 777 (1961); Pascarella v. Pgh. Rwys. Co., 389 Pa. 8, 131 A. 2d 445 (1957). See also Kessler v. Matlack, 210 Pa. Superior Ct. 450, 233 A. 2d 592 (1967).
Orders granting new trials affirmed.
Mr. Chief Justice Bell took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Mr. Justice Cohen took no part in the decision of this case.