Case Name: Irving GREENBLATT, Petitioner, v. VICTOR ADDING MACHINE CO. et al., Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1964-04-15
Citations: 163 So. 2d 759
Docket Number: No. 33244
Parties: Irving GREENBLATT, Petitioner, v. VICTOR ADDING MACHINE CO. et al., Respondents.
Judges: DREW, C. J., and THORNAL, O’CON-NELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 163
Pages: 759–759

Head Matter:
Irving GREENBLATT, Petitioner, v. VICTOR ADDING MACHINE CO. et al., Respondents.
No. 33244.
Supreme Court of Florida.
April 15, 1964.
Rehearing Denied May 26, 1964.
Milton Robbins, Miami Beach, for petitioner.
Lally, Miller & Hodges, Miami, for Victor Adding Machine Co.; Patrick H. Mears and Paul E. Speh, Tallahassee, for Florida Industrial Commission, respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date November 26,1963.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
DREW, C. J., and THORNAL, O'CON-NELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.