Case Name: Lucio Flores ORTEGA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ernest C. ROE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2000-04-24
Citations: 209 F.3d 1122
Docket Number: No. 97-17232
Parties: Lucio Flores ORTEGA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ernest C. ROE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before: BEEZER, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 209
Pages: 1122–1122

Head Matter:
Lucio Flores ORTEGA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ernest C. ROE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 97-17232.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
April 24, 2000
Before: BEEZER, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
Upon consideration of the opinion of the Supreme Court we vacate our opinion in Ortega v. Roe, 160 F.3d 534 (9th Cir.1998). This case is remanded to the district court for proceedings consistent with the-opinion in Ernest C. Roe, Warden v. Lucio Flores-Ortega, — U.S.-, 120 S.Ct. 1029, 145 L.Ed.2d 985 (2000).
The clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith.