Case Name: IN the INTEREST OF: S.T. and P.T.; Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. B.T. (Father), Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2015-01-27
Citations: 453 S.W.3d 347
Docket Number: WD 77700 Consolidated with WD 77701
Parties: IN the INTEREST OF: S.T. and P.T.; Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. B.T. (Father), Appellant.
Judges: Before Division One: Cynthia L. Martin, Presiding Judge, Thomas H. Newton, Judge and Mark D. Pfeiffer, Judge
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 453
Pages: 347–347

Head Matter:
IN the INTEREST OF: S.T. and P.T.; Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. B.T. (Father), Appellant.
WD 77700 Consolidated with WD 77701
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
ORDER FILED: January 27, 2015
Summer A. Duke, St. Joseph, MO, for respondent.
Lindsey C. Bachman, St. Joseph, MO, for appellant.
Before Division One: Cynthia L. Martin, Presiding Judge, Thomas H. Newton, Judge and Mark D. Pfeiffer, Judge

Opinion:
ORDER
Per curiam:
B.T. appeals a judgment terminating his parental rights to his son, P.T., and his daughter, S.T. Because the trial court did not err in finding that clear and convincing evidence established a statutory ground for terminating B.T.'s parental rights, and did not err in finding by a preponderance of the evidence that termination of B.T.'s parental rights was in the best interests of P.T. ánd S.T., we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).