Case Name: In re SOUTHERN PACIFIC FUNDING CORPORATION, Debtor. Brenda A. Walker, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Southern Pacific Funding Corporation, Claimant-Appellee, and Chicago Title Field Service, Incorporated, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-02-22
Citations: 3 F. App'x 164
Docket Number: No. 00-2286
Parties: In re SOUTHERN PACIFIC FUNDING CORPORATION, Debtor. Brenda A. Walker, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Southern Pacific Funding Corporation, Claimant-Appellee, and Chicago Title Field Service, Incorporated, Defendant.
Judges: Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 3
Pages: 164–165

Head Matter:
In re SOUTHERN PACIFIC FUNDING CORPORATION, Debtor. Brenda A. Walker, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Southern Pacific Funding Corporation, Claimant-Appellee, and Chicago Title Field Service, Incorporated, Defendant.
No. 00-2286.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 31, 2001.
Decided Feb. 22, 2001.
Brenda A. Walker, pro se. Michael Joshua Lichtenstein, Swidler, Berlin, Shereff & Friedman, L.L.P., Washington, DC, for appellee.
Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Brenda A. Walker appeals from the district court's orders: (1) affirming the bankruptcy court's entry of default judgment against her and (2) denying her motion for reconsideration. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Walker v. Southern Pacific Funding Corp., Nos. CA-99-3814-DKC; BK-99-1059 (D.Md. filed Aug. 21, 2000; entered Aug. 22, 2000; Sept. 19, 2000). In light of this disposition, we deny Walker's motion to remand. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Chicago Title Field Service, Inc., has filed a request to dismiss a portion of appeal and to strike portions of Walker's informal brief. Because Chicago Title Field Service, Inc., is not a party to this appeal in this court, we deny the request.