Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. James BOWZER, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-06-12
Citations: 46 S.W.3d 666
Docket Number: No. ED 78235
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. James BOWZER, Appellant.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., P.J., MARY RHODES RUSSELL and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 46
Pages: 666–666

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. James BOWZER, Appellant.
No. ED 78235.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
June 12, 2001.
Joseph L. Green, St. Charles, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Dora A. Fichter, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., P.J., MARY RHODES RUSSELL and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
James Bowzer (Defendant) appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered following a jury verdict convicting him of one count of robbery in the first degree in violation of section 569.020, RSMo 2000. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no jurisprudential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).