Case Name: DE BRUNOFF v. McCLURE-TISSOT CO. et al.
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1903-05-08
Citations: 82 N.Y.S. 38
Docket Number: 
Parties: DE BRUNOFF v. McCLURE-TISSOT CO. et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 82
Pages: 38–39

Head Matter:
DE BRUNOFF v. McCLURE-TISSOT CO. et al.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
May 8, 1903.)
1. Witnesses — Order for Examination of Officers of Corporation— Documents to be Produced.
An order for the examination of officers of defendant corporations, requiring such officers to produce all the books of defendants upon such examination, was too broad, and should have been restricted to the corporate minute books and by-laws of the defendant which evidenced the instrument set out in the complaint, and books of all defendants relating to contracts annexed to, and made a part of, the complaint.
Appeal from Special Term, New York County.
Action by Maurice De Brunoff against the McClure-Tissot Company and another. From an order denying a motion to vacate an order for the examination of the officers of the defendant corporations, defendants appeal.
Modified.
Argued before VAN BRUNT, P. J., and McLAUGHLIN, O’BRIEN, INGRAHAM, and LAUGHLIN, JJ.
H. W. Simpson, for appellants.
William D. Gaillard, for respondent.

Opinion:
INGRAHAM, J.
I think the affidavits sufficient to justify an order for the examination of the officers of the defendant corporations as to the authority of Brady to indorse the instruments set out in the complaint on behalf of the S. S. McClure Company; as to the agreement for an extension of time, for the payment of the amount to be paid by the instrument sued on; as to notice to the indorser of the presentation of these instruments to the acceptor, and demand for payment thereof; as to the refusal of the acceptor to pay, and as to the knowledge of the defendant of the invalidity of' the copyrights referred to in the answer before the execution of the instrument sought to be enforced. I think, however, that the order is too broad; requiring, as it does, the officers of the corporations to be examined to produce all the books of the defendants upon such examination. The only books or documents that could be used upon such examination would be the corporate minute books and by-laws of the defendant the S. S. McClure Company, and the books of the defendant corporations relating to the contracts which are annexed to, and made a part of, the complaint. The order should therefore be modified by requiring the officers of the defendants named to appear for examination, the examination to be restricted to the subjects above indicated, and to produce at the examination the minute books of the S. S. McClure Company, and all books and records in possession of the defendants relating to, or containing any reference to, the instruments in suit, or the contracts annexed to the complaint; and, as thus modified, the order appealed from should be affirmed, without costs. All concur.