Case Name: In re MARRIAGE OF Janet SIESENER and Charles W. Siesener. Janet SIESENER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles W. SIESENER, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1984-04-17
Citations: 670 S.W.2d 550
Docket Number: Nos. 47212, 47213
Parties: In re MARRIAGE OF Janet SIESENER and Charles W. Siesener. Janet SIESENER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles W. SIESENER, Respondent.
Judges: REINHARD and CRANDALL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 670
Pages: 550–550

Head Matter:
In re MARRIAGE OF Janet SIESENER and Charles W. Siesener. Janet SIESENER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles W. SIESENER, Respondent.
Nos. 47212, 47213.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
April 17, 1984.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 17, 1984.
James F. Malone, St. Louis, for petitioner-appellant.
William R. Gartenberg, Clayton, for respondent.

Opinion:
KAROHL, Presiding Judge.
Cross-appeals in dissolution of marriage case.
On appeal, the wife alleges error in granting custody of daughter to husband; husband contests award of attorney's fees to wife's attorney.
After a full and careful review of the entire record we find the decree to be supported by substantial evidence on the issues raised by both appeals. Further, the decree does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo.banc 1976).
An opinion reciting the facts and restating the law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
REINHARD and CRANDALL, JJ., concur.