Case Name: Robert W. Lesley and John W. Trinkle, copartners, trading as Lesley & Trinkle ; McAvoy & McMichael, Limited, and Josiah Thompson, trading as J. Thompson & Co., Appellants, v. J. Sellers Kite and Robert Moore, copartners, now or late trading as J. Sellers Kite & Co., and the City of Philadelphia; Thomas M. Thompson and George S. Webster
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1899-07-19
Citations: 192 Pa. 275
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 398
Parties: Robert W. Lesley and John W. Trinkle, copartners, trading as Lesley & Trinkle ; McAvoy & McMichael, Limited, and Josiah Thompson, trading as J. Thompson & Co., Appellants, v. J. Sellers Kite and Robert Moore, copartners, now or late trading as J. Sellers Kite & Co., and the City of Philadelphia; Thomas M. Thompson and George S. Webster.
Judges: Before Stbbbett, C. J., Gbeen, Dean and Fell, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 192
Pages: 275–276

Head Matter:
Robert W. Lesley and John W. Trinkle, copartners, trading as Lesley & Trinkle ; McAvoy & McMichael, Limited, and Josiah Thompson, trading as J. Thompson & Co., Appellants, v. J. Sellers Kite and Robert Moore, copartners, now or late trading as J. Sellers Kite & Co., and the City of Philadelphia; Thomas M. Thompson and George S. Webster.
Argued March 22, 1898.
Appeal, No. 398, Jan. T., 1897, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. No. 1, Phila. Co., March Term, 1897, No. 1171, dismissing bill in equity.
Before Stbbbett, C. J., Gbeen, Dean and Fell, JJ.
Affirmed.
July 19, 1899:

Opinion:
Opinion by
Mb. Chief Justice Stebbett,
This case was heard and considered with No. 397 of January term, 1898, in which an opinion affirming the decree of the court below has just been filed, ante, p. 268. Both cases involve substantially the same questions, and, for reasons given in the opinion referred to, the decree in tins case is affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellants' costs.