Case Name: Arthur RODGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bobby SHEARIN; Sergeant Sires; Officer Stevens; Lieutenant Wilt; Officer Mallow; Officer Raley; Greg Flury, Physician's Assistant, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-07-23
Citations: 535 F. App'x 224
Docket Number: No. 13-6500
Parties: Arthur RODGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bobby SHEARIN; Sergeant Sires; Officer Stevens; Lieutenant Wilt; Officer Mallow; Officer Raley; Greg Flury, Physician’s Assistant, Defendants-Ap-pellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 535
Pages: 224–225

Head Matter:
Arthur RODGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bobby SHEARIN; Sergeant Sires; Officer Stevens; Lieutenant Wilt; Officer Mallow; Officer Raley; Greg Flury, Physician’s Assistant, Defendants-Ap-pellees.
No. 13-6500.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 18, 2013.
Decided: July 23, 2013.
Arthur Rodgers, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland; Michelle Jacquelyn Marzullo, Richard P. Seitz, Marks, O’Neill, O’Brien, Doherty & Kelly, P.C., Towson, Maryland, for Appel-lees.
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Arthur Rodgers appeals the district court's order granting Defendants' motions for summary judgment and denying relief on Rodgers' 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Rodgers v. Shearin, No. l:ll-cv-01585-CCB, 2018 WL 1190788 (D.Md. Mar. 21, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.