Case Name: Nathan POLITTE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2018-06-05
Citations: 548 S.W.3d 456
Docket Number: ED 106035
Parties: Nathan POLITTE, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 548
Pages: 456–457

Head Matter:
Nathan POLITTE, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
ED 106035
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Filed: June 5, 2018
Lisa M. Stroup, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Movant/Appellant.
Mary Highland Moore, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent/Respondent.
Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Nathan Politte appeals from the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k); Little v. State, 427 S.W.3d 846, 850 (Mo. App. E.D. 2014). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment and order pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. 2014, unless otherwise indicated.