Case Name: James HICKLIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-08-06
Citations: 87 S.W.3d 335
Docket Number: No. WD 59880
Parties: James HICKLIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before LISA WHITE HARDWICK, Presiding Judge, JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge and RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 87
Pages: 335–335

Head Matter:
James HICKLIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 59880.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Aug. 6, 2002.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 1, 2002.
Application for Transfer Denied Nov. 26,2002.
John M. Schilmoeller, Assistant State Public Defender, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Dora A. Fiehter, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before LISA WHITE HARDWICK, Presiding Judge, JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge and RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
James Hicklin appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).