Case Name: Kenneth R. FRANKLIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-03-09
Citations: 752 So. 2d 1254
Docket Number: No. 1D99-2343
Parties: Kenneth R. FRANKLIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: BOOTH, JOANOS and WEBSTER, JJ., CONCUR.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 752
Pages: 1254–1254

Head Matter:
Kenneth R. FRANKLIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D99-2343.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
March 9, 2000.
Wm. Michael Hunter, Panama City, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; Thomas D. Winokur and Sherri Tolar Rollison, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this direct criminal appeal, appellant argues that his sentencing guidelines scoresheet should have included only 12 community sanction violation points, rather than the 48 that were included. Having reviewed the record, we conclude that this issue was not preserved because the objection made did not apprise the trial court of the ground upon which it was based, and because counsel never requested and obtained a ruling on the objection. § 924.051(1)(b) & (3), Fla. Stat. (1997). To the extent that any error occurred, it is clearly not "fundamental." Accordingly, we affirm.
AFFIRMED.
BOOTH, JOANOS and WEBSTER, JJ., CONCUR.