Case Name: Michael GALLEGOS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles L. RYAN, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-11-30
Citations: 842 F.3d 1123
Docket Number: No. 08-99029
Parties: Michael GALLEGOS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles L. RYAN, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before: MARSHA S. BERZON, CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN, and CARLOS T. BEA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 842
Pages: 1123–1125

Head Matter:
Michael GALLEGOS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles L. RYAN, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 08-99029
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Filed November 30, 2016
Dale A. Baich, Emma Lauren Smith, Esquires Assistant Federal Public Defenders, Ashwin Cattamanchi, FPDAZ-Federal Public Defenders Office (Phoenix), Phoenix, AZ, for Petitioner-Appellant.
Jon Anderson, Esquire, Assistant Attorney General, Arizona Attorney General’s Office, Phoenix, AZ, for. Respondent-Ap-pellee.
Before: MARSHA S. BERZON, CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN, and CARLOS T. BEA, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
Appellant Gallegos's Petition for Panel Rehearing is granted.
The first paragraph of the panel's April 7, 2016 order is amended to read as follows:
The panel GRANTS IN PART Appellant Gallegos's Motion for Stay and Partial Remand for Reconsideration in Light of Martinez v. Ryan, 566 U.S. 1, 132 S.Ct. 1309, 182 L.Ed.2d 272 (2012). On remand, the District Court shall consider Gallegos's timely Martinez claim and, accordingly, determine whether he can show cause and prejudice to excuse the procedural default with respect to' his claim that counsel failed to investigate and present mitigating evidence of Gallegos's alleged organic brain damage. See Dickens v. Ryan, 740 F.3d 1302, 1320 (9th Cir. 2014) (en banc). Gallegos's request for a stay of appellate proceedings is denied as moot.
The second paragraph of-the April 7, 2016 order remains in effect.
The panel's April 7, 2016 opinion affirming the denial of Appellant's other habeas claim remains in force.
The Clerk shall issue the mandate seven days after the date of this order.-
No further petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc shall be entertained.