Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Surinder Singh NIJJAR, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-05-26
Citations: 332 F. App'x 378
Docket Number: No. 08-10269
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Surinder Singh NIJJAR, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before PREGERSON, CANBY, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 332
Pages: 378–379

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Surinder Singh NIJJAR, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-10269.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 12, 2009.
Filed May 26, 2009.
Mark J. McKeon, Esquire, USF — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Fresno, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Anthony P. Capozzi, Fresno, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before PREGERSON, CANBY, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Surinder Singh Nijjar appeals from the 12-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for making false statements to a government agency, and aiding and abetting, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 and 2. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Nijjar contends that the district court erred by enhancing his sentence pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2Bl.l(b)(ll) (2002) because it improperly relied on certain testimony, and because the government's evidence failed to demonstrate that the offense involved a conscious or reckless risk of serious bodily injury or death. We conclude that the district court did not err. See United, States v. Johansson, 249 F.3d 848, 859-60 (9th Cir.2001).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.