Case Name: Jonas Okwuchukwu OKWARA, Petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-12-21
Citations: 625 F. App'x 208
Docket Number: No. 15-1503
Parties: Jonas Okwuchukwu OKWARA, Petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before DUNCAN and AGEE Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 625
Pages: 208–208

Head Matter:
Jonas Okwuchukwu OKWARA, Petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 15-1503.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 16, 2015.
Decided: Dec. 21, 2015.
Randall L. Johnson, Johnson & Associates, P.C., Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner. Benjamin C. Mizer,’Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Anthony W. Norwood, Senior Litigation Counsel, Wendy Benner-León, Office Of Immigration Litigation, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Before DUNCAN and AGEE Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jonas Okwuchukwu Okwara, a native and citizen of Nigeria, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing, his appeal from the Immigration Judge's denial of his motion to reopen as untimely and numerically barred. We have reviewed the administrative record and the Board's order and find no abuse of discretion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(1) (2015). We therefore deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Okwara (B.I.A. Apr. 8, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions áre adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.