Case Name: IN the INTEREST OF: A.L.E.H.; K.L.K., Respondent, v. K.D.H. (Mother), Appellant, P.J.H. (Father), Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2017-07-18
Citations: 524 S.W.3d 172
Docket Number: WD 80386 (Consolidated with WD 80388)
Parties: IN the INTEREST OF: A.L.E.H.; K.L.K., Respondent, v. K.D.H. (Mother), Appellant, P.J.H. (Father), Appellant.
Judges: Before Division Four: Mark D. Pfeiffer, Presiding Judge, Victor C. Howard, Judge and James E. Welsh, Judge
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 524
Pages: 172–173

Head Matter:
IN the INTEREST OF: A.L.E.H.; K.L.K., Respondent, v. K.D.H. (Mother), Appellant, P.J.H. (Father), Appellant.
WD 80386 (Consolidated with WD 80388)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Order filed: July 18, 2017
Sarah Johnston, Katherine Jean Rodgers, Kansas City, for Respondents.
Jill Marie Katz, Ryan F. Kaiser, Kansas City, for Appellants.
Before Division Four: Mark D. Pfeiffer, Presiding Judge, Victor C. Howard, Judge and James E. Welsh, Judge

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
K.D.H. and P.J.H. appeal the judgment of the Jackson County Circuit Court ter minating their parental rights over A.L.E.H. and approving the adoption of A.L.E.H. by K.L.K. They present nine points on appeal. Seven of those points claim the circuit court erred in terminating their parental rights pursuant to each statutory ground cited by the court. An eighth point claims that the mother's consent was required pursuant to Chapter 453. A ninth point claims the circuit court erred in denying deposition costs. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).