Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gary CUNNINGHAM, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-12-20
Citations: 210 F. App'x 269
Docket Number: No. 06-6886
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gary CUNNINGHAM, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 210
Pages: 269–269

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gary CUNNINGHAM, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-6886.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 14, 2006.
Decided: Dec. 20, 2006.
Gary Cunningham, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. McWilliams, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Thomas Edward Johnston, Office of the United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Gary Cunningham seeks to appeal his conviction and sentence. In criminal cases, the defendant must file the notice of appeal within ten days after the entry of judgment. Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(1)(A). With or without a motion, upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause, the district court may grant an extension of up to thirty days to file a notice of appeal. Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes, 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir.1985).
The district court entered judgment on January 15, 2002. The notice of appeal was filed on April 26, 2006. Because Cunningham failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.