Case Name: Raeburn S. GRASTY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Isaac T. ANDERSON, Officer; Christopher M. Hamilton, Defendants-Appellants, and The City of Roanoke; A.L. Joe Gaskins, Chief of Police; Barbara P. Carter, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-02-10
Citations: 413 F. App'x 588
Docket Number: No. 10-1964
Parties: Raeburn S. GRASTY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Isaac T. ANDERSON, Officer; Christopher M. Hamilton, Defendants-Appellants, and The City of Roanoke; A.L. Joe Gaskins, Chief of Police; Barbara P. Carter, Defendants.
Judges: Before AGEE, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 413
Pages: 588–588

Head Matter:
Raeburn S. GRASTY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Isaac T. ANDERSON, Officer; Christopher M. Hamilton, Defendants-Appellants, and The City of Roanoke; A.L. Joe Gaskins, Chief of Police; Barbara P. Carter, Defendants.
No. 10-1964.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Jan. 25, 2011.
Submitted: Jan. 25, 2011.
Decided: Feb. 10, 2011.
Timothy Ross Spencer, City Attorney’s Office, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellants. Raeburn S. Grasty, Appellee Pro Se.
Before AGEE, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Isaac T. Anderson and Christopher M. Hamilton appeal the district court's order granting in part and denying in part summary judgment for the Appellants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Grasty v. Anderson, No. 7:09-cv-00471-SGW-PMS, 2010 WL 3219991 (W.D.Va. Aug. 13, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.