Case Name: F. B. Harvey v. The State
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1909-06-19
Citations: 57 Tex. Crim. 7
Docket Number: No. 4256
Parties: F. B. Harvey v. The State.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Criminal Reports
Volume: 57
Pages: 7–8

Head Matter:
F. B. Harvey v. The State.
No. 4256.
Decided June 19, 1909.
Rehearing denied October 13, 1909.
1. —Wilfully Exposing Person — Assignment of Errors — Motion for New Trial.
An assignment of errors lias no place in the Court of Criminal Appeals; all errors must be raised in the motion for new trial.
2. —Same—Motion for New Trial — Filing.
Upon appeal it is necessary that the motion for new trial is filed in the court below, otherwise it cannot be considered.
Appeal from the County Court of Knox. Tried below before the Hon. J. H. Milam.
Appeal from a conviction of wilfully exposing person, etc.; penalty, a fine of $10.
The opinion states the case.
J. S. Kendall and Jas. A. Stephens, for appellant.
F. J. McCord, Assistant Attorney-General, for the State. .

Opinion:
BROOKS, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of wilfully exposing his person, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $10.
We find no motion for a new trial in the record. We find an assignment of errors, but an assignment of errors has no place in this court. All errors in the charge must be reserved in a motion for a new trial. The assignment of errors is not'filed in the lower court. In the absence of motion for a new trial there is nothing in this record authorizing a review.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.