Case Name: Brooke BRICKER, Respondent, v. James BRICKER, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2016-02-16
Citations: 481 S.W.3d 890
Docket Number: No. ED 102784
Parties: Brooke BRICKER, Respondent, v. James BRICKER, Appellant.
Judges: Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J. and Angela T. Quigless,. J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 481
Pages: 890–891

Head Matter:
Brooke BRICKER, Respondent, v. James BRICKER, Appellant.
No. ED 102784
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Filed: February 16, 2016
Alan W. Cohen, 501- North Taylor Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri 63108, for Appellant.
Elaine A. Pudlowski, Frankel, Rubin, Bond, Dubin, Siegel & Klein, P.C., 231 South Bémiston Avenue, Suite 1111, Clayton, Missouri 63105.
Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J. and Angela T. Quigless,. J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
James Bricker (Husband) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis dissolving his marriage to Brooke Bricker (Wife) and awarding Wife sole legal and physical custody of the children. Husband argues that the trial court erred by 1) failing to grant Husband unsupervised visitation, 2) ordering Husband to pay fifty percent of the children's private schooling costs, and 3) dividing Husband's pension through the- Fireman's Retirement System of St. Louis. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record' on appeal and have determined that' an extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).