Case Name: Central Hanover Bank and Trust Company (Successor by Merger to Central Union Trust Company of New York), as Trustee under the Last Will and Testament of Selmar Hess, Deceased, of the Trusts Created Thereby for the Benefit of Gertrude R. H. Elkus and Ruth Hess Albert, Appellant, v. Clara Eisner and Others, Defendants; The Chase National Bank of the City of New York and Joseph Roe (Sometimes Known as Joseph A. Rose), as Trustees under the Last Will and Testament of Betty Satz, Also Known as Bettie Satz, and Bertha Satz, Deceased, in Trust for Clara Eisner, Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1937-01-22
Citations: 249 A.D. 843
Docket Number: 
Parties: Central Hanover Bank and Trust Company (Successor by Merger to Central Union Trust Company of New York), as Trustee under the Last Will and Testament of Selmar Hess, Deceased, of the Trusts Created Thereby for the Benefit of Gertrude R. H. Elkus and Ruth Hess Albert, Appellant, v. Clara Eisner and Others, Defendants; The Chase National Bank of the City of New York and Joseph Roe (Sometimes Known as Joseph A. Rose), as Trustees under the Last Will and Testament of Betty Satz, Also Known as Bettie Satz, and Bertha Satz, Deceased, in Trust for Clara Eisner, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 249
Pages: 843–843

Head Matter:
Central Hanover Bank and Trust Company (Successor by Merger to Central Union Trust Company of New York), as Trustee under the Last Will and Testament of Selmar Hess, Deceased, of the Trusts Created Thereby for the Benefit of Gertrude R. H. Elkus and Ruth Hess Albert, Appellant, v. Clara Eisner and Others, Defendants; The Chase National Bank of the City of New York and Joseph Roe (Sometimes Known as Joseph A. Rose), as Trustees under the Last Will and Testament of Betty Satz, Also Known as Bettie Satz, and Bertha Satz, Deceased, in Trust for Clara Eisner, Respondents.

Opinion:
Order denying the plaintiff's motion to confirm the report of an official referee, by which report the value of the property, the subject of the foreclosure action, is fixed at $9,800, and which order fixed the value at $12,000, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ.