Case Name: Everett J. Krantz et al., Appellants, v. Evi Scholtz et al., Defendants, and Albert Mendel & Sons, Inc., et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1994-05-12
Citations: 83 N.Y.2d 902
Docket Number: 
Parties: Everett J. Krantz et al., Appellants, v Evi Scholtz et al., Defendants, and Albert Mendel & Sons, Inc., et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 83
Pages: 902–903

Head Matter:
Everett J. Krantz et al., Appellants, v Evi Scholtz et al., Defendants, and Albert Mendel & Sons, Inc., et al., Respondents.
Submitted March 28, 1994;
decided May 12, 1994

Opinion:
Motions for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution (see, Paglia v Agrawal, 69 NY2d 946; Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals § 36 [b], at 143-144).