Case Name: First National Bank of St. Petersburg, Florida, a corporation, and A. M. Anderson, as Receiver of the First National Bank of St. Petersburg, Florida, a corporation, Appellants, vs. N. F. Stone and Louise M. Stone his wife; Clarence M. Busch, as Trustee; Elizabeth J. Artman and Ellwood B. Chapman, Executors of the Estate of James Artman, deceased; Chas. A. Bainum, as Administrator ad litem for the Estate of James Artman, deceased; Cameron & Barkley Company, a corporation; St. Petersburg Novelty Works, a corporation; and Otis Elevator Company, a corporation, Appellees
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1931-11-24
Citations: 103 Fla. 691
Docket Number: 
Parties: First National Bank of St. Petersburg, Florida, a corporation, and A. M. Anderson, as Receiver of the First National Bank of St. Petersburg, Florida, a corporation, Appellants, vs. N. F. Stone and Louise M. Stone his wife; Clarence M. Busch, as Trustee; Elizabeth J. Artman and Ellwood B. Chapman, Executors of the Estate of James Artman, deceased; Chas. A. Bainum, as Administrator ad litem for the Estate of James Artman, deceased; Cameron & Barkley Company, a corporation; St. Petersburg Novelty Works, a corporation; and Otis Elevator Company, a corporation, Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 103
Pages: 691–692

Head Matter:
First National Bank of St. Petersburg, Florida, a corporation, and A. M. Anderson, as Receiver of the First National Bank of St. Petersburg, Florida, a corporation, Appellants, vs. N. F. Stone and Louise M. Stone his wife; Clarence M. Busch, as Trustee; Elizabeth J. Artman and Ellwood B. Chapman, Executors of the Estate of James Artman, deceased; Chas. A. Bainum, as Administrator ad litem for the Estate of James Artman, deceased; Cameron & Barkley Company, a corporation; St. Petersburg Novelty Works, a corporation; and Otis Elevator Company, a corporation, Appellees.
137 So. 799.
En Banc.
Decision filed November 24, 1931.
Spear, Tiney & Shelton and Arthur B. Thompson, for Appellants;
Chas. A. Bamum, Wilbur C. Stone and Mabry, Beaves & White, for Appellees.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed.
Buford, O.J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J. J., concur.