Case Name: Blue Bird Coach Lines, Inc., Respondent, v. City of Niagara Falls et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1981-04-02
Citations: 53 N.Y.2d 731
Docket Number: 
Parties: Blue Bird Coach Lines, Inc., Respondent, v City of Niagara Falls et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 53
Pages: 731–734

Head Matter:
Blue Bird Coach Lines, Inc., Respondent, v City of Niagara Falls et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.
Argued February 19, 1981;
decided April 2, 1981
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Carl E. Mooradian, Corporation Counsel (Bernard Sax of counsel), for appellants.
Patrick J. Berrigan for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Though overbreadth analysis is inapplicable to commercial speech (People v Mobil Oil Corp., 48 NY2d 192, 199), the provisions of the Codified Ordinances of the City of Niagara Falls in question are unconstitutional as applied to plaintiff. Section 315.01 violates the First Amendment because its licensing requirement is unrelated to time, place or manner of distribution (People v Remeny, 40 NY2d 527; Lovell v Griffin, 303 US 444). It also violates the Fourteenth Amendment because it discriminates against plaintiff, a nonresident. Section 731.16 seeks to regulate handbill distribution as to time and place, but its time limitation of 5 minutes in front of any building and 15 minutes on any block is unreasonably restrictive in relation to the objectives of the ordinance. Section 375.06 (subds [h], [i]) regulates manner of distribution, but its prohibition of signalling, arm waving, or calling to prospective handbill recipients is likewise unreasonably restrictive in relation to the declared objectives of the ordinance.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur in memorandum.
Order affirmed.