Case Name: Torrick Johntrelle RODGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WASTE INDUSTRIES INCORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-01-31
Citations: 553 F. App'x 332
Docket Number: No. 13-7418
Parties: Torrick Johntrelle RODGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WASTE INDUSTRIES INCORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before SHEDD, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 553
Pages: 332–333

Head Matter:
Torrick Johntrelle RODGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WASTE INDUSTRIES INCORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 13-7418.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 22, 2014.
Decided: Jan. 31, 2014.
Torrick Johntrelle Rodgers, Appellant Pro Se. Tobias Samuel Hampson, Paul J. Puryear, Jr., Wyrick, Robbins, Yates & Ponton, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Torrick Johntrelle Rodgers appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting the Defendant's motion to dismiss his civil complaint under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Rodgers v. Waste Indus. Inc., No. 4:12-cv-00294-FL, 2018 WL 4460265 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 22, 2013). We deny Rodgers's motion to present newly discovered evidence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.