Case Name: GLOVER v. BALTIMORE & O. R. CO. (HOWARD et al., Third-Party Defendants); FRIES v. SAME
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1946-10-22
Citations: 158 F.2d 157
Docket Number: Nos. 9168, 9171
Parties: GLOVER v. BALTIMORE & O. R. CO. (HOWARD et al., Third-Party Defendants). FRIES v. SAME.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 158
Pages: 157–157

Head Matter:
GLOVER v. BALTIMORE & O. R. CO. (HOWARD et al., Third-Party Defendants). FRIES v. SAME.
Nos. 9168, 9171.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Argued Oct. 16, 1946.
Decided Oct. 22, 1946.
Vincent M. Casey, of Pittsburgh, Pa. (Margiotti & Casey, of Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellants.
A. H. Rosenberg, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellee.
Sanford M. Chilcote, of Pittsburgh, Pa. (Dickie, Robinson & McCamey, of Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for Keystone Transfer Co.
Before ALBERT LEE STEPHENS, GOODRICH, and McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
These two appeals were presented together and were tried together in the District Court. They involve claims on behalf of persons suffering property damage in a collision between a Baltimore & Ohio Railroad train and a loaded trailer truck which was crossing the track. The Trial Judge submitted the case to the jury and it found for the plaintiffs. We have considered the facts and agree with the District Court that the case was one to be submitted to the jury and that there is sufficient factual basis to support its finding. The appellant raises one point about the sufficiency of the proof as to damage. We are satisfied that here, too, proof was sufficient to take the case to the jury.
The judgments are affirmed.