Case Name: Mariette DO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-02-24
Citations: 88 F. App'x 211
Docket Number: No. 03-72195; U.S. Tax Ct. No. 12528-02L
Parties: Mariette DO, Petitioner—Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent—Appellee.
Judges: Before FERNANDEZ, W. FLETCHER and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 88
Pages: 211–212

Head Matter:
Mariette DO, Petitioner—Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent—Appellee.
No. 03-72195.
U.S. Tax Ct. No. 12528-02L.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 17, 2004.
Decided Feb. 24, 2004.
Mariette Do, pro se, San Diego, CA, Petitioner-Appellant.
Charles S. Casazza, Gary R. Allen, Gilbert S. Rothenberg, Washington, DC, for Respondent-Appellee.
Before FERNANDEZ, W. FLETCHER and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Mariette Do appeals pro se the Tax Court's summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, finding that the Commissioner could proceed with a proposed collection action to satisfy Do's 1991 income tax obligations.
The Tax Court correctly rejected Do's contention that she is not obliged to pay federal income tax because she disagrees with United States government policies. Autenrieth v. United States, 418 F.2d 586, 589 (9th Cir.1969). The Tax Court also correctly determined that Do failed to raise any genuine issue of material fact. Hansen v. United States, 7 F.3d 137, 138 (9th Cir.1993). Accordingly, the Tax Court correctly granted the Commissioner's summary judgment motion.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.