Case Name: Manuel BRAUNSTEIN et al., t/a Power Produce Company, Appellants, v. Hunter SMITH et al., Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1958-11-26
Citations: 261 F.2d 766
Docket Number: No. 14434
Parties: Manuel BRAUNSTEIN et al., t/a Power Produce Company, Appellants, v. Hunter SMITH et al., Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 261
Pages: 766–766

Head Matter:
Manuel BRAUNSTEIN et al., t/a Power Produce Company, Appellants, v. Hunter SMITH et al., Appellees.
No. 14434.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued Nov. 19, 1958.
Decided Nov. 26, 1958.
Mr. Thomas S. Jackson, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Robert M. ■Gray and Martin R. Fain, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellants.
Mr. Rex K. Nelson, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Eugene X. Murphy, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for .appellees.
Before Reed, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, retired, and Bazelon and Fahy, Circuit Judges.
Sitting by designation pursuant to the provisions of Sec. 294(a), Title 28, U.S.Code.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appeal by defendant is from a .judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of plaintiffs for damages due to injuries suffered in an automobile collision. The question is essentially whether it was reversible error for the trial court to refuse to instruct the jury, as requested, with respect to a certain minor aspect of the evidence. In the context of the case as a whole we think the failure so to instruct did not constitute reversible error.
Affirmed.