Case Name: Property Asset Management, Inc., Appellant, v. S&R Associates et al., Defendants, and Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1997-04-07
Citations: 238 A.D.2d 328
Docket Number: 
Parties: Property Asset Management, Inc., Appellant, v S&R Associates et al., Defendants, and Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 238
Pages: 328–328

Head Matter:
Property Asset Management, Inc., Appellant, v S&R Associates et al., Defendants, and Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman, Respondent.
[656 NYS2d 913]

Opinion:
—In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff has an easement over property owned by the defendant Saul Muchnick Irrevocable Trust, and for damages for misrepresentation and fraud, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kohn, J.), dated April 1, 1996, which granted the motion by the defendant Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint against the defendant Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman (see, Metral v Horn, 213 AD2d 524; Marine Midland Bank v Renck, 208 AD2d 688; see also, Tycon I Inv. v Burgee Architects, 234 AD2d 748). Sullivan, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.