Case Name: Patrick Ricardo SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doug WALKER; FNU Fortner, Nurse; FNU Evans, Nurse, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-08-24
Citations: 476 F. App'x 417
Docket Number: No. 12-6798
Parties: Patrick Ricardo SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doug WALKER; FNU Fortner, Nurse; FNU Evans, Nurse, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 476
Pages: 417–417

Head Matter:
Patrick Ricardo SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doug WALKER; FNU Fortner, Nurse; FNU Evans, Nurse, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 12-6798.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 20, 2012.
Decided: Aug. 24, 2012.
Patrick Ricardo Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Bulluck Ricci, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Patrick Ricardo Smith appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Walker, 845 F.Supp.2d 673 (W.D.N.C. 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.