Case Name: Michael A. NEWMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2011-11-01
Citations: 351 S.W.3d 273
Docket Number: No. WD 72986
Parties: Michael A. NEWMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Division Two: MARK D. PFEIFFER, Presiding Judge, VICTOR C. HOWARD, Judge and CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 351
Pages: 273–274

Head Matter:
Michael A. NEWMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 72986.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Nov. 1, 2011.
Mark A. Grothoff, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang and Evan J. Buchheim, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before Division Two: MARK D. PFEIFFER, Presiding Judge, VICTOR C. HOWARD, Judge and CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Michael Newman appeals from the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. Newman claims that the motion court clearly erred because he received ineffective assistance of counsel in that his trial counsel failed to cross examine the victim adequately. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).