Case Name: UNITED STATES v. COTTON VALLEY OPERATORS COMMITTEE et al.
Court: United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1948-03-13
Citations: 8 F.R.D. 35
Docket Number: Civil Action No. 2209
Parties: UNITED STATES v. COTTON VALLEY OPERATORS COMMITTEE et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Rules Decisions
Volume: 8
Pages: 35–36

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES v. COTTON VALLEY OPERATORS COMMITTEE et al.
Civil Action No. 2209.
District Court, W. D. Louisiana, Shreveport Division.
March 13, 1948.
See also 75 F.Supp. 1.
Tom C. Clark, Atty. Gen., Jno. F. Sonnett, Geo. B. Haddock, W. B. Watson Snyder, and Jas. R. Browning, Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen., and Malcolm E. Lafargue, U. S. Atty., of Shreveport, La., for plaintiff.
Jno. M. Madison, W. S. Wilkinson, Wilkinson, Lewis & Wilkinson, Jno. T. Guyton, J. R. Goff, and Sidney G. Myers, all of Shreveport, La., and Vernon Roberts, of Ada, Okl., for defendants.

Opinion:
DAWKINS, District Judge.
After due consideration of the motion to quash service of process, made by J. J. Frommer on whom it was served for the Cotton Valley Operators' Committee, without finding it necessary to enter into an extended discussion of authorities, this Court is of the opinion that the same should be and it is accordingly overruled. See United Mine Workers v. Coronado Coal Co., 259 U.S. 344, 42 S.Ct. 570, 66 L.Ed. 975, 27 A. L.R. 762; United States v. Greater New York Live Poultry Chamber of Commerce, D.C., 30 F.2d 939; Dowd v. United Mine Workers, 8 Cir., 235 F. 1; Sperry Products, Inc., v. Ass'n American Railroads, 2 Cir., 132 F.2d 408, 145 A.L.R. 694; Hecht, Trustees, v. Malley, 265 U.S. 144, 44 S.Ct. 462, 68 L.Ed. 949; and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 17(b), 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.