Case Name: UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee v. Guillermo Chan SANCHEZ, also known as Guillermo Sanchez Chan Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-11-09
Citations: 700 F. App'x 568
Docket Number: No. 17-1715
Parties: UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee v. Guillermo Chan SANCHEZ, also known as Guillermo Sanchez Chan Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 700
Pages: 568–568

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee v. Guillermo Chan SANCHEZ, also known as Guillermo Sanchez Chan Defendant-Appellant
No. 17-1715
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: November 1, 2017
Filed: November 9, 2017
Amy L. Jennings, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Des Moines, IA, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Guillermo Chan Sanchez, Pro Se
Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Guillermo Chan Sanchez directly appeals the sentence the district court imposed after he pleaded guilty to immigration and drug offenses. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), suggesting that the sentence is substantively unreasonable.
After careful review, we conclude that the district court did not impose a substantively unreasonable sentence. See United States v. Salazar-Aleman, 741 F.3d 878, 881 (8th Cir. 2013) (discussing appellate review of sentencing decisions). In addition, having independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment, and we grant counsel's motion to withdraw.
, The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.