Case Name: Kimberly KENNEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS at Little Rock; University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences; Rainwater Holt & Sexton; Central for Arkansas Legal Services; University of Arkansas Human Resource Department; University of Arkansas Department of Public Safety; University of Arkansas Student Accounts; University of Arkansas Financial Aid Office; Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-06-27
Citations: 653 F. App'x 487
Docket Number: No. 16-1270
Parties: Kimberly KENNEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS at Little Rock; University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences; Rainwater Holt & Sexton; Central for Arkansas Legal Services; University of Arkansas Human Resource Department; University of Arkansas Department of Public Safety; University of Arkansas Student Accounts; University of Arkansas Financial Aid Office; Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MURPHY, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 653
Pages: 487–487

Head Matter:
Kimberly KENNEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS at Little Rock; University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences; Rainwater Holt & Sexton; Central for Arkansas Legal Services; University of Arkansas Human Resource Department; University of Arkansas Department of Public Safety; University of Arkansas Student Accounts; University of Arkansas Financial Aid Office; Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-1270
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Filed: June 27, 2016
Submitted: June 23, 2016
Kimberly, Kenney, Pro se, Little Rock, AR, Plaintiff-Appellant.
Before MURPHY, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Kimberly Kenney appeals the district court's preservice dismissal of her pro se complaint alleging employment discrimination and claims related to state-court litigation. Following careful de novo review, see Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam), we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.