Case Name: HEINTZELMAN'S FORD, INC., a Florida Corporation and Johnny Bolton Ford, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Petitioners, v. John D. CALVIN, Director of the Division of Motor Vehicles of the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles of the State of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1975-04-08
Citations: 310 So. 2d 426
Docket Number: No. W-283
Parties: HEINTZELMAN’S FORD, INC., a Florida Corporation and Johnny Bolton Ford, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Petitioners, v. John D. CALVIN, Director of the Division of Motor Vehicles of the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles of the State of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: RAWLS, C. J., and JOHNSON and MILLS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 310
Pages: 426–426

Head Matter:
HEINTZELMAN’S FORD, INC., a Florida Corporation and Johnny Bolton Ford, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Petitioners, v. John D. CALVIN, Director of the Division of Motor Vehicles of the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles of the State of Florida, Respondent.
No. W-283.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
April 8, 1975.
William L. Eagan, Arnold, Matheny & Eagan, Orlando, for petitioners.
John B. Kent, and John B. Kent, Kent, Sears, Durden & Kent, Jacksonville, Edwin E. Strickland, and Enoch J. Whitney, Tallahassee, for respondent.
J. Robert McClure Jr., of McClure & Wigginton, Tallahassee, for amicus curiae.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This petition for writ of certiorari seeks reversal of the respondent's order granting the issuance of a motor vehicle dealer's license to Mclnerney Ford, Inc.
We have heard oral argument in this cause and have carefully examined the record and the briefs submitted by the parties, as well as the brief of the Amicus Curiae. Upon our consideration thereof, we conclude that respondent's order is supported by substantial, competent evidence and was entered pursuant to lawful procedures and authority.
Petitioners having failed to demonstrate grounds for the relief sought, the petition for writ of certiorari is denied.
RAWLS, C. J., and JOHNSON and MILLS, JJ., concur.