Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert E. HYDE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1997-08-28
Citations: 124 F.3d 1033
Docket Number: No. 95-10113
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert E. HYDE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: FERGUSON, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 124
Pages: 1033–1034

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert E. HYDE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 95-10113.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Aug. 28, 1997.
Jonathan D. Soglin, Oakland, California, and Robert E. Hyde, pro se, San Francisco, California, for the defendant-appellant.
Joel R. Levin, Assistant United States Attorney, San Francisco, California, for the plaintiff-appellee.
Before: FERGUSON, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judge:
Robert Elmer Hyde was indicted for mail fraud and wire fraud. See 18 U.S.C. § 1341, 1343, 2(b). He entered into a plea agreement, and the district court accepted his plea. Hyde then sought to withdraw his plea, but the district court refused to allow him to do so. He appealed.
We agreed that the district court had erred and we reversed. United States v. Hyde, 82 F.3d 319 (9th Cir.), amended, 92 F.3d 779 (1996). However, the United States Supreme Corut disagreed; it reversed us. United States v. Hyde, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 1630, 137 L.Ed.2d 935 (1997). Therefore, we now affirm the district court's determination.
AFFIRMED.
. Hyde has also raised additional issues, which we will dispose of in a memorandum disposition.