Case Name: Otto ESCALANTE-DE LEON, Petitioner v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General of the United States, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-05-07
Citations: 564 F. App'x 865
Docket Number: No. 13-2409
Parties: Otto ESCALANTE-DE LEON, Petitioner v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General of the United States, Respondent.
Judges: Before BYE, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 564
Pages: 865–865

Head Matter:
Otto ESCALANTE-DE LEON, Petitioner v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General of the United States, Respondent.
No. 13-2409.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: May 6, 2014.
Filed: May 7, 2014.
Rockne Ole Cole, Cole & Vondra, Iowa City, IA, for Petitioner.
Kevin J. Conway, Karen Yolanda Drum-mond, Richard M. Evans, Andrew Oliveira, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before BYE, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Guatemalan citizen Otto Escalante-De Leon petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals, which upheld an immigration judge's decision denying his motion to suppress evidence used by the government to establish his remov-ability. After careful review, we find no basis for reversal. See Martinez Carcamo v. Holder, 713 F.3d 916, 921 (8th Cir.2013) (in removal actions, this court reviews legal issues de novo, and reviews factual findings for support by substantial evidence); Lopez-Gabriel v. Holder, 653 F.3d 683, 686-87 (8th Cir.2011) (concluding that evidentiary hearing and suppression of evidence were not warranted where record did not support either alien's assertion that his stop and arrest were racially motivated, or his assertion that questioning by immigration agents was coercive). Accordingly, we deny the petition. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.