Case Name: ATLANTIC MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION AND SAPOLIN PAINTS, INC., A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. MARY A. RICHARDS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIX, ETC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND NATIONAL LEAD COMPANY, ETC., DEFENDANT, AND THE EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY ASSURANCE CORP., LTD., A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1969-02-26
Citations: 105 N.J. Super. 48
Docket Number: 
Parties: ATLANTIC MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION AND SAPOLIN PAINTS, INC., A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. MARY A. RICHARDS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIX, ETC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND NATIONAL LEAD COMPANY, ETC., DEFENDANT, AND THE EMPLOYERS’ LIABILITY ASSURANCE CORP., LTD., A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 105
Pages: 48–49

Head Matter:
ATLANTIC MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION AND SAPOLIN PAINTS, INC., A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. MARY A. RICHARDS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIX, ETC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND NATIONAL LEAD COMPANY, ETC., DEFENDANT, AND THE EMPLOYERS’ LIABILITY ASSURANCE CORP., LTD., A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued February 13,1969
Decided February 26, 1969.
Before Judges Sullivan, Foley and Lewis.
Mr. Richard J. Badolaio argued the cause for plaintiffs-appellants (Messrs. Schneider & Morgan, attorneys).
Sonia Napolitano argued the cause for defendant-respondent (Messrs. Pindar, McElroy, Connell & Foley, attorneys).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment herein is affirmed substan-
tially for the reasons given by Judge Purman in his opinion. In addition, we conclude that Sapolin Paints was not using the vehicle at the time of the accident in question and, therefore, was not an additional insured under Employers' policy.
Affirmed.