Case Name: Louis Marx & Co. v. United States; Henry A. Wess, Inc. v. United States; Craig Panorama, Inc., et al. v. United States; L. E. McIntyre and Company v. United States; Paul E. Sernau, Inc. v. United States
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1967-04-25
Citations: 58 Cust. Ct. 883
Docket Number: No. P67/121; protest 326711-K (New York); No. P67/119; protests 62/18615, etc. (Cleveland); No. P67/120; protests 64/16799, etc. (Los Angeles); No. P67/121; protests 64/16812 and 64/16849 (Los Angeles); No. P67/122; protest 66/2747 (New York)
Parties: Louis Marx & Co. v. United States,
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Volume: 58
Pages: 883–883

Head Matter:
BEFORE THE FlRST DIVISION,
April 25, 1967
No. P67/118.
No. P67/119.
No. P67/120.
No. P67/121.
No. P67/122.
Louis Marx & Co. v. United States,
protest 326711-K (New York).
Henry A. Wess, Inc. v. United States,
protests 62/18615, etc. (Cleveland).
Craig Panorama, Inc., et al. v. United States,
protests 64/16799, etc. (Los Angeles).
L. E. McIntyre and Company v. United States,
protests 64/16812 and 64/16849 (Los Angeles).
Paul E. Sernau, Inc. v. United States,
protest 66/2747 (New York).

Opinion:
Oliver, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of James G. Wiley Co., a/c Ungar Electric Tools, Inc. v. United States (49 Cust. Ct. 199, Abstract 66961), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.