Case Name: Gilda WOODS v. WINN-DIXIE MONTGOMERY, L.L.C., The Coca-Cola Company a.k.a. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Company a.k.a. Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc., and Jonathan Burden
Court: Louisiana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 2018-10-29
Citations: 255 So. 3d 567
Docket Number: No. 2018-C-1263
Parties: Gilda WOODS
v.
WINN-DIXIE MONTGOMERY, L.L.C., The Coca-Cola Company a.k.a. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Company a.k.a. Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc., and Jonathan Burden
Judges: CRICHTON, J., would grant and docket and assigns reasons.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 255
Pages: 567–568

Head Matter:
Gilda WOODS
v.
WINN-DIXIE MONTGOMERY, L.L.C., The Coca-Cola Company a.k.a. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Company a.k.a. Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc., and Jonathan Burden
No. 2018-C-1263
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
October 29, 2018
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, FIFTH CIRCUIT, PARISH OF ST. CHARLES
Denied.
CRICHTON, J., would grant and docket and assigns reasons.

Opinion:
In this trip and fall case, the underlying issue is whether two cases of drinks left in the beverage aisle of a grocery store by a distributor created an unreasonable risk of harm, leading to a finding of liability as found by the trial court here, or whether it was an open and obvious condition, which would lead to an opposite result. I would grant and docket the defendant's application in this matter to explore whether the trial court erred in delivering what the court of appeal deemed to be a "compressed" jury instruction regarding the factors used to determine whether a condition is open and obvious. See Broussard v. State, through Office of State Bldgs., Div. of Admin. , 12-1238 (La. 4/5/13), 113 So.3d 175, 184.