Case Name: Arthur R. CARTER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN, FCI EDGEFIELD, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-12-20
Citations: 491 F. App'x 411
Docket Number: No. 12-7296
Parties: Arthur R. CARTER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN, FCI EDGEFIELD, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 491
Pages: 411–411

Head Matter:
Arthur R. CARTER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN, FCI EDGEFIELD, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 12-7296.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 11, 2012.
Decided: Dec. 20, 2012.
Arthur R. Carter, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Arthur R. Carter, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in for-ma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Carter v. Warden, 2012 WL 3029381 (D.S.C. July 25, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.