Case Name: Wanda M. STEWART, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. YLI CORPORATION; Phillip Staffing, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-11-13
Citations: 50 F. App'x 147
Docket Number: No. 02-2134
Parties: Wanda M. STEWART, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. YLI CORPORATION; Phillip Staffing, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILLIAM D. WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 50
Pages: 147–148

Head Matter:
Wanda M. STEWART, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. YLI CORPORATION; Phillip Staffing, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 02-2134.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 7, 2002.
Decided Nov. 13, 2002.
Wanda M. Stewart, Appellant Pro Se. Beverly A. Carroll, Kennedy, Covington, Lobdell & Hickman, L.L.P., Rock Hill, South Carolina; Andreas Neal Satterfield, Jr., Haynsworth, Baldwin, Johnson & Greaves, L.L.C., Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before WILLIAM D. WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Wanda M. Stewart seeks to appeal the district court's order granting summary judgment to the Defendants in her employment discrimination action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because Stewart's notice of appeal was not timely filed.
Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court's final judgment or order to note an appeal, see Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (1960)).
The district court's order was entered on the docket on August 20, 2002. Stewart's notice of appeal was filed on September 23, 2002. Because Stewart failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.