Case Name: WALLINGFORD v. WOOD et al.
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1914-02-28
Citations: 41 Okla. 572
Docket Number: No. 3474
Parties: WALLINGFORD v. WOOD et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 41
Pages: 572–573

Head Matter:
WALLINGFORD v. WOOD et al.
No. 3474.
Opinion Filed February 28, 1914.
(139 Pac. 252.)
APPEAL AND ERROR — Dismissal—Brief. Where plaintiff in error has filed no brief, as required by rule 7 of this court (38 Olcla. vi), the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Syllabus by Rittenhouse, C.)
Error from Superior Court, Custer County; I. W. Lazvter, Judge.
Action in replevin by Lydia L. Wallingford against C. B. Wood and the Bonebrake-Lacy Hardware Company. Judgment for the defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
Dismissed.
M. L. Holcombe, for plaintiff in error.
Shull & McKnight, for defendants in error.

Opinion:
Opinion by
RITTENHOUSE, C.
This appeal was filed in this court January 2, 1912. Neither party has filed a brief, nor have the)'- offered any excuse for the failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The appeal should therefore be dismissed for want, of prosecution under rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi). Streeter v. McCoy, 34 Okla. 490, 136 Pac. 216; Thompson v. Murray, 34 Okla. 521, 135 Pac. 1133; Streeter v. Huene, 34 Okla. 491, 126 Pac. 216; Reliable Ins. Co. v. Newcomber, 34 Okla. 759, 127 Pac. 260; M., O. & G. Ry. Co. v. Johnson, 34 Okla. 816, 137 Pac. 386; First Nat. Bank v. Baldwin, 34 Okla. 825, 127 Pac. 260; Snow v. Frye, 34 Okla. 836, 137 Pac. 422.
By the Court: It is so ordered.