Case Name: LEONARD BROTHERS TRUCKING CO., Inc., Brandon Transfer & Storage, Inc., Rountree Transport, Inc., Redwing Carriers, Inc., and Merle Merchants, Inc., Petitioners, v. William T. MAYO, Chairman, Jerry W. Carter, and Jess Yarborough as and constituting the Florida Public Service Commission, Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1970-01-28
Citations: 231 So. 2d 221
Docket Number: No. 38888
Parties: LEONARD BROTHERS TRUCKING CO., Inc., Brandon Transfer & Storage, Inc., Rountree Transport, Inc., Redwing Carriers, Inc., and Merle Merchants, Inc., Petitioners, v. William T. MAYO, Chairman, Jerry W. Carter, and Jess Yarborough as and constituting the Florida Public Service Commission, Respondents.
Judges: ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 231
Pages: 221–221

Head Matter:
LEONARD BROTHERS TRUCKING CO., Inc., Brandon Transfer & Storage, Inc., Rountree Transport, Inc., Redwing Carriers, Inc., and Merle Merchants, Inc., Petitioners, v. William T. MAYO, Chairman, Jerry W. Carter, and Jess Yarborough as and constituting the Florida Public Service Commission, Respondents.
No. 38888.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Jan. 28, 1970.
Rehearing Denied March 6, 1970.
John T. Bond and Richard B. Austin, Tallahassee, for petitioners.
Lewis W. Petteway and Donald R. Alexander, Tallahassee, for Florida Public Service Commission, respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This cause is before us on petition for writ of certiorari to the Florida Public Service Commission to review Order Number 8451, dated May 21, 1969, and Order Number 8483, dated June 27, 1969, granting the application of Matassa, Inc., for a contract carrier's certificate for transportation of pre-stressed and precast products to various points in the State using special equipment under contract with Conerec, Inc.
Our consideration of the petition, record, briefs and argument of counsel, leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
Accordingly, petition for writ of cer-tiorari is denied.
It is so ordered.
ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.