Case Name: Sean SAPIENZA, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2013-03-26
Citations: 436 S.W.3d 237
Docket Number: No. ED 98865
Parties: Sean SAPIENZA, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondant.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 436
Pages: 237–237

Head Matter:
Sean SAPIENZA, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondant.
No. ED 98865.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
March 26, 2013.
Allen Mason, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Todd T. Smith, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Sean Sapienza appeals from a Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).