Case Name: In re Evan Scott KAGAN, Respondent
Court: District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Decision Date: 2014-11-26
Citations: 130 A.3d 951
Docket Number: No. 14-BG-1002
Parties: In re Evan Scott KAGAN, Respondent.
Judges: BEFORE: GLICKMAN, Associate Judge, and NEBEKER and RUIZ, Senior Judges.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 130
Pages: 951–951

Head Matter:
In re Evan Scott KAGAN, Respondent.
No. 14-BG-1002.
District of Columbia Court of Appeáls.
Filed Nov. 26, 2014.
BEFORE: GLICKMAN, Associate Judge, and NEBEKER and RUIZ, Senior Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
On consideration of the certified order suspending respondent from the practice of law in the state of Florida for 90 days, this court's September 24, 2014, order directing respondent to show cause why reciprocal discipline should not be' imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel'regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file a response to this court's order to show cause but did file an. affidavit as required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) on October 16, 2014, it is
ORDERED that Evan Scott Kagan -is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a period of 90 days, nunc pro tunc to October 16, 2014. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010), and In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007).