Case Name: The United Electric Light & Power Company, Respondent, v. The Grand Central Real Estate & Investment Company, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1900-12
Citations: 33 Misc. 771
Docket Number: 
Parties: The United Electric Light & Power Company, Respondent, v. The Grand Central Real Estate & Investment Company, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 33
Pages: 771–771

Head Matter:
The United Electric Light & Power Company, Respondent, v. The Grand Central Real Estate & Investment Company, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, rendered in • the Municipal Court of the city of Eew York, second district, borough of Manhattan.
Eorster & Speir, for appellant.
G. W. Simpson, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
In this case, although the contract was made in the names of Tiernan & S'omers, it was so made at the request of and for the benefit of the defendant, in order to enable it to get the increased discount. Credit was not given to Tiernan & Somers, but was given to the defendant. The earlier bills appear to have been paid by the defendant. This is not a case of one giving credit to a disclosed principal.
Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugbo, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.