Case Name: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Daniel F. LOUGHNANE, Petitioner
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2016-07-19
Citations: 158 A.3d 1224
Docket Number: No. 164 MAL 2016
Parties: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Daniel F. LOUGHNANE, Petitioner
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 158
Pages: 1224–1224

Head Matter:
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Daniel F. LOUGHNANE, Petitioner
No. 164 MAL 2016
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
July 19, 2016

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 19th day of July, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues.
Whether the Superior Court erred by holding that the automobile exception, adopted in Commonwealth v. Gary, 91 A.3d 102 (Pa. 2014), allowed police to seize a vehicle from the defendant's private residential driveway without a warrant?