Case Name: Lynette ROGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Alberto R. GONZALES; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-12-01
Citations: 209 F. App'x 671
Docket Number: No. 06-15551
Parties: Lynette ROGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Alberto R. GONZALES; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: LEAVY, GOULD and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 209
Pages: 671–672

Head Matter:
Lynette ROGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Alberto R. GONZALES; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 06-15551.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 27, 2006.
Filed Dec. 1, 2006.
Lynette Rogers, Mountain View, CA, pro se.
Sara Winslow, Esq., USSF — Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: LEAVY, GOULD and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Alberto R. Gonzales is substituted for his predecessor, John Ashcroft, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Appellant's motion for an extension of time to file an opposition to appellees' mo tion for summary disposition is granted. The Clerk shall file the opposition received on August 11, 2006.
A review of the record and the opening brief indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam).
Accordingly, appellees' motion for summary affirmance is granted. The suggestion of entry of a pre-filing review order is denied.
All pending motions are denied as moot.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.