Case Name: In the Matter of A.N., C.N., M.S., & F.J.S., Minors
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-11-12
Citations: 93 S.W.3d 764
Docket Number: Nos. ED 80836-80838, ED 80840
Parties: In the Matter of A.N., C.N., M.S., & F.J.S., Minors.
Judges: Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, C.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and MARY R. RUSSELL, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 93
Pages: 764–764

Head Matter:
In the Matter of A.N., C.N., M.S., & F.J.S., Minors.
Nos. ED 80836-80838, ED 80840.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Northern Division.
Nov. 12, 2002.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 14, 2003.
Barry Cundiff, Kirksville, MO, for appellant.
Leonard Crabtree, Shelbina, pro se.
John Munson Morris III, Gary L. Gardner, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, C.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and MARY R. RUSSELL, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
B.N. ("Mother") appeals the trial court's judgment terminating her parental rights to her four children. She argues the trial court lacked jurisdiction to enter the judgment because the matter was not properly assigned to the trial judge, the court lacked a knowing and voluntary consent to termination, and no other evidence supported termination of her parental rights.
We find the trial court properly had jurisdiction over Mother's case. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. In re D.C., 49 S.W.3d 694, 697 (Mo.App.2001).
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).