Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joe Nathan DARBY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-12-27
Citations: 501 F. App'x 304
Docket Number: No. 12-6585
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joe Nathan DARBY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 501
Pages: 304–304

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joe Nathan DARBY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-6585.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 18, 2012.
Decided: Dec. 27, 2012.
Joe Nathan Darby, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Joe Nathan Darby appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reason stated by the district court. United States v. Darby, No. 4:05-cr-00465-RBH-1 (D.S.C. Mar. 5, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.