Case Name: Andre JUSTE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RESIDENT AGENCY; Erie Pennsylvania (Satellite Office); William J. Green Building; Edward J. Hanko; Federal Bureau of Investigation; Pittsburgh Leadership Agent; Federal Bureau of Investigation Headquarters Office; Robert F. Mueller, (Chief Agent James S. Yawne Director Agents), Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-07-31
Citations: 694 F. App'x 137
Docket Number: No. 17-1375
Parties: Andre JUSTE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RESIDENT AGENCY; Erie Pennsylvania (Satellite Office); William J. Green Building; Edward J. Hanko; Federal Bureau of Investigation; Pittsburgh Leadership Agent; Federal Bureau of Investigation Headquarters Office; Robert F. Mueller, (Chief Agent James S. Yawne Director Agents), Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 694
Pages: 137–137

Head Matter:
Andre JUSTE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RESIDENT AGENCY; Erie Pennsylvania (Satellite Office); William J. Green Building; Edward J. Hanko; Federal Bureau of Investigation; Pittsburgh Leadership Agent; Federal Bureau of Investigation Headquarters Office; Robert F. Mueller, (Chief Agent James S. Yawne Director Agents), Defendants-Appellees.
No. 17-1375
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 27, 2017
Decided: July 31, 2017
Andre Juste, Appellant Pro Se.
Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Andre Juste appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil action for failure to prosecute. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in for ma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Juste v. Resident Agency, No. 3:14-cv-00130-JPB-RWT (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 31, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED