Case Name: Jeffery S. MUSSELMAN, Petitioner v. DEPARTMENT OF the ARMY, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-07-20
Citations: 868 F.3d 1341
Docket Number: 2016-2522
Parties: Jeffery S. MUSSELMAN, Petitioner v. DEPARTMENT OF the ARMY, Respondent
Judges: Before PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, LOURIE, DYK, O’MALLEY, REYNA, WALLACH, TARANTO, CHEN, HUGHES, and STOLL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 868
Pages: 1341–1342

Head Matter:
Jeffery S. MUSSELMAN, Petitioner v. DEPARTMENT OF the ARMY, Respondent
2016-2522
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
July 20, 2017
Robert J. Gajarsa, Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, DC, filed a petition for hearing en banc for petitioner Jeffery S. Musselman. Also represented by Gabriel Bell, Savannah Kent Burgoyne, Michael J. 'Gerardi, Emily K Sauter.
Mariana Teresa Acevedo, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, filed a response to the petition for respondent Department of the Army. Also represented by Chad A. Readler, Robert E. Kirschman, Jr„ Claudia Burke; Rebecca E. Ausprung, United States Army Litigation Division, Fort Belvoir, VA.
Before PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, LOURIE, DYK, O’MALLEY, REYNA, WALLACH, TARANTO, CHEN, HUGHES, and STOLL, Circuit Judges.
Circuit Judge Moore did not participate.

Opinion:
WALLACH, Circuit Judge,
with whom NEWMAN and O'MALLEY, Circuit Judges, join, dissent from the denial of the petition for hearing en banc for the reasons stated in the dissent from denial of the petition for rehearing en banc in Fedora v. Merit Systems Protection Board, No. 15-3039.
STOLL, Circuit Judge, dissents without opinion from the denial of the petition for hearing en banc.