Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daryl W. SMITH, a/k/a D-Nice, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-09-14
Citations: 478 F. App'x 768
Docket Number: No. 12-7128
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daryl W. SMITH, a/k/a D-Nice, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 478
Pages: 768–769

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daryl W. SMITH, a/k/a D-Nice, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-7128.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 11, 2012.
Decided: Sept. 14, 2012.
Daryl W. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. John Castle Parr, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Ap-pellee.
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Daryl W. Smith appeals the district court's order denying his motion pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 36 to correct an alleged clerical error in his amended judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Smith, No. 1:03-cr-00039-FPS-9 (ND.W.Va. June 22, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.