Case Name: Jacob H. MALTA and Malmark, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SCHULMERICH CARILLONS, INC., and Ronald O. Beach, Defendants/Cross-Appellants, and Kelly-Michener, Inc., and the Handchime Company, Ltd., Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1992-03-09
Citations: 959 F.2d 923
Docket Number: Nos. 90-1250, 90-1269
Parties: Jacob H. MALTA and Malmark, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SCHULMERICH CARILLONS, INC., and Ronald O. Beach, Defendants/Cross-Appellants, and Kelly-Michener, Inc., and the Handchime Company, Ltd., Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 959
Pages: 923–923

Head Matter:
Jacob H. MALTA and Malmark, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SCHULMERICH CARILLONS, INC., and Ronald O. Beach, Defendants/Cross-Appellants, and Kelly-Michener, Inc., and the Handchime Company, Ltd., Defendants.
Nos. 90-1250, 90-1269.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
March 9, 1992.
Charles N. Quinn of Miller & Quinn, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiffs-appellants.
Albert W. Preston, Jr. of Woodcock Washburn Kurtz Mackiewicz & Norris, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendants/cross-appellants. With him on the brief was John P. Donohue, Jr.

Opinion:
ORDER
A suggestion for rehearing in banc having been filed in this case, and a response thereto having been invited by the court and filed,
UPON CONSIDERATION THEREOF, it is
ORDERED that the suggestion for rehearing in banc be, and the same hereby is, declined.