Case Name: Joseph INNES, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-06-24
Citations: 620 So. 2d 1233
Docket Number: No. 79902
Parties: Joseph INNES, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: overton, McDonald, shaw, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 620
Pages: 1233–1234

Head Matter:
Joseph INNES, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 79902.
Supreme Court of Florida.
June 24, 1993.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Allyn Giambalvo, Asst. Public Defender, Tenth Judicial Circuit, Clearwater, for petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Peggy A. Quince and Stephen A. Baker, Asst. Attys. Gen., Tampa, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have for review Innes v. State, 597 So.2d 966 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), in which the district court asserted conflict with Lang v. State, 566 So.2d 1354 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.
We addressed the issue in this case in Sirmons v. State, 620 So.2d 1249 (Fla.1993). Accordingly, we quash the decision below and remand for proceedings consistent with Sirmons.
It is so ordered.
overton, McDonald, shaw, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.
BARKETT, C.J., concurs specially with an opinion.