Case Name: George V. CHRISTMAN et al., Co-partners doing business under the name and style of Christman & Company, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MARISTELLA COMPANIA NAVIERA, Defendant, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOYD, WEIR & SEWELL, INC., Third-Party Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1972-10-16
Citations: 468 F.2d 620
Docket Number: No. 86, Docket 72-1376
Parties: George V. CHRISTMAN et al., Co-partners doing business under the name and style of Christman & Company, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MARISTELLA COMPANIA NAVIERA, Defendant, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOYD, WEIR & SEWELL, INC., Third-Party Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 468
Pages: 620–621

Head Matter:
George V. CHRISTMAN et al., Co-partners doing business under the name and style of Christman & Company, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MARISTELLA COMPANIA NAVIERA, Defendant, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOYD, WEIR & SEWELL, INC., Third-Party Defendant-Appellee.
No. 86, Docket 72-1376.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued Oct. 16, 1972.
Decided Oct. 16, 1972.
Nicholas J. Healy, Jr., New York City (Healy & Baillie, William F. Losquadro, New York City, of counsel), for defendant, third-party plaintiff-appellant.
Edward L. Smith, New York City (Kirlin, Campbell & Keating, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellee.
R. Glenn Bauer, New York City (Haight, Gardner, Poor & Havens, New York City, of counsel), for third-party defendant-appellee.
Beforé MANSFIELD, OAKES and TIMBERS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
We affirm the judgment of the district court upon the carefully considered opinion of Judge Brieant, reported at 349 F.Supp. 845 (S.D.N.Y.1971).