Case Name: Victor Charles FOURSTAR, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MURLAK, Institutional Counselor; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-02-11
Citations: 314 F. App'x 58
Docket Number: No. 07-56644
Parties: Victor Charles FOURSTAR, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MURLAK, Institutional Counselor; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: O’SCANNLAIN, BYBEE, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 314
Pages: 58–59

Head Matter:
Victor Charles FOURSTAR, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MURLAK, Institutional Counselor; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 07-56644.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 13, 2009.
Filed Feb. 11, 2009.
Victor Charles Fourstar, Jr., Tucson, AZ, pro se.
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, BYBEE, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Federal prisoner Victor Charles Fours-tar, Jr. appeals pro se from the district court's denial of his request to file his action without prepayment of the full filing fee. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion. Calhoun v. Stahl, 254 F.3d 845 (9th Cir. 2001) (per curiam). We vacate and remand.
The reason given by the district court for denying Fourstar permission to file his action without prepayment, his failure to file a certified copy of his trust fund statement for the last six months, is not supported by the record. Accordingly, we remand to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this disposition.
No costs awarded on appeal.
VACATED and REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.