Case Name: Antonio Martinez LARA, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2008-08-05
Citations: 268 S.W.3d 421
Docket Number: No. WD 68602
Parties: Antonio Martinez LARA, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before JAMES M. SMART, JR., P.J., THOMAS H. NEWTON, and RONALD R. HOLLIGER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 268
Pages: 421–421

Head Matter:
Antonio Martinez LARA, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 68602.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Aug. 5, 2008.
John G. Mermelstein, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Cory L. Atkins, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before JAMES M. SMART, JR., P.J., THOMAS H. NEWTON, and RONALD R. HOLLIGER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Mr. Antonio Martinez-Lara appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion, in which the motion court found that the failure of plea counsel to inform him of parole requirements was a collateral consequence of the plea, and, therefore, plea counsel was effective.
For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).