Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DAVID AUSTIN, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1990-04-04
Citations: 101 Or. App. 231
Docket Number: P000566; CA A60583
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DAVID AUSTIN, Appellant.
Judges: Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Newman and Deits, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 101
Pages: 231–232

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted October 27, 1989,
affirmed April 4, 1990
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DAVID AUSTIN, Appellant.
(P000566; CA A60583)
789 P2d 18
Glenn N. Solomon, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.
Katherine H. Waldo, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.
Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Newman and Deits, Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants. ORS 813.010. He contends that the court erred by admitting certain documents; he contends that they are hearsay.
The evidence of defendant's guilt was overwhelming and any error in admitting the documents was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.
Affirmed.