Case Name: THOMAS BRYSON, Respondent, v. BERNARD SHERIDAN, Appellant; THOMAS BRYSON and another, Respondents, v. BERNARD SHERIDAN, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1874
Citations: 9 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 676
Docket Number: 
Parties: THOMAS BRYSON, Respondent, v. BERNARD SHERIDAN, Appellant. THOMAS BRYSON and another, Respondents, v. BERNARD SHERIDAN, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Supreme Court Reports (Hun)
Volume: 9
Pages: 676–676

Head Matter:
THOMAS BRYSON, Respondent, v. BERNARD SHERIDAN, Appellant. THOMAS BRYSON and another, Respondents, v. BERNARD SHERIDAN, Appellant.
Appeals from orders made at the Special Term, denying motions to set aside the judgments-entered in the above entitled actions.
The judgments were entered in pursuance of a stipulation entered into by the attorneys of the respective parties, in open court and in the presence of the defendant. The motions were made on the ground that the defendant did not fully comprehend the nature and effect of the agreement. The General Term affirmed the orders, holding that upon the appeal papers it was impossible to doubt that the basis of the judgment was fully understood and assented to by the defendant.
Edward M. Shepard, for the appellant.
F. A. Ward, for the respondent.

Opinion:
Opinion by Talcott, J.
Present — Barnard, P. J., Talcott and Tappen, JJ.
Order affirmed with costs.