Case Name: Nathan J. ALLEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2016-03-01
Citations: 482 S.W.3d 824
Docket Number: No. ED 102603
Parties: Nathan J. ALLEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 482
Pages: 824–825

Head Matter:
Nathan J. ALLEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 102603
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Filed: March 1, 2016
■ Lisa M. Stroup, Missouri Public Defender Office, 1010 Market St., Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for Appellant.
Chris Kbster, Attorney General, Robert Jefferson Bartholomew, Jr., Asst." Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson "City, MO 65102, for Respondent.
Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Nathan Allen appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).