Case Name: G. Kevin ELLIOTT, Petitioner/Respondent, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Respondent/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-02-24
Citations: 131 S.W.3d 370
Docket Number: No. ED 82673
Parties: G. Kevin ELLIOTT, Petitioner/Respondent, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Respondent/Appellant.
Judges: Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 131
Pages: 370–370

Head Matter:
G. Kevin ELLIOTT, Petitioner/Respondent, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Respondent/Appellant.
No. ED 82673.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Feb. 24, 2004.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 1, 2004.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., James A. Chenault, III, Special Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Appellant.
Law Offices of Robert S. Adler, P.C., Robert S. Adler, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The Director of Revenue appeals from the trial court's judgment reinstating petitioner G. Kevin Elliott's driving privileges, which had been revoked for one year pursuant to Section 302.505.1 RSMo 2000. Applying the principles set out in Verdoorn v. Director of Revenue, 119 S.W.3d 543 (Mo. banc 2003), we find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value.
We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).