Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Elder Rocael TZACIR-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2019-07-01
Citations: 928 F.3d 448
Docket Number: No. 14-41437
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
Elder Rocael TZACIR-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before JOLLY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 928
Pages: 448–450

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
Elder Rocael TZACIR-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant
No. 14-41437
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
FILED July 1, 2019
Lauretta Drake Bahry, Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, U.S. Attorney's Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, H. Michael Sokolow, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender's Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Elder Rocael Tzacir-Garcia, Pro Se.
Before JOLLY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge:
In 2014, Elder Rocael Tzacir-Garcia pled guilty to one count of illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 1326(b)(2). Tzacir-Garcia was sentenced to forty-one months' imprisonment. He appealed, arguing that the district court committed plain error by concluding that he qualified for a sentencing enhancement under § 1326(b)(2) because of a previous conviction for an aggravated felony, as defined in 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a)(43). Section 1101(a)(43) incorporates the definition of crime of violence used in 18 U.S.C. § 16(b). We summarily affirmed Tzacir-Garcia's sentence, concluding that his prior Texas robbery conviction was a crime of violence under § 16(b). United States v. Tzacir-Garcia , 674 F. App'x 387 (5th Cir. 2017) ; see Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 29.02(a)(1).
The Supreme Court vacated our decision and remanded for us to reconsider in the light of Sessions v. Dimaya , - U.S. -, 138 S.Ct. 1204, 200 L.Ed.2d 549 (2018), which held § 16(b) was unconstitutionally vague. Alvaro-Velasco v. United States , - U.S. -, 138 S.Ct. 1977, 201 L.Ed.2d 238 (2018). At that time, Tzacir-Garcia's conviction for Texas robbery was not a crime of violence under § 16(a) because we had held that it lacked as an element the "use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force." United States v. Burris , 896 F.3d 320 (5th Cir. 2018).
Upon remand, we directed the parties to file supplemental briefing. Tzacir-Garcia asked that we remand this case for the district court to amend the judgment to reflect conviction and sentencing under § 1326(b)(1), not § 1326(b)(2). The United States agreed that we should reform the judgment. See United States v. Godoy , 890 F.3d 531, 542 (5th Cir. 2018) (reforming judgment to reflect sentencing under § 1326(b)(1) without remanding to the district court).
Since that supplemental briefing was filed, however, the opinion in Burris was withdrawn, and the panel, in the light of Stokeling v. United States , - U.S. -, 139 S.Ct. 544, 202 L.Ed.2d 512 (2019), and United States v. Reyes-Contreras , 910 F.3d 169 (5th Cir. 2018) (en banc), issued a new opinion holding that Texas robbery requires the "use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force" and is therefore a crime of violence under the Armed Career Criminal Act. United States v. Burris , 920 F.3d 942, 945 (5th Cir. 2019). Accordingly, Tzacir-Garcia's conviction for Texas robbery is also a crime of violence under § 16(a) and thus an aggravated felony for purposes of § 1326(b)(2). See United States v. Plaza-Montecillo , No. 18-10688, 772 Fed.Appx. 84, 84-85, 2019 WL 2406627, at *1 (5th Cir. June 6, 2019) (per curiam) (unpublished) (holding Texas robbery conviction qualified as an aggravated felony). We perceive no error in Tzacir-Garcia's conviction and sentence under § 1326(b)(2). The judgment of the district court is therefore
AFFIRMED.
Section 1326(b)(2) provides that any alien "whose removal was subsequent to a conviction for commission of an aggravated felony . shall be fined under such title, imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both."
Section 1326(b)(1) provides that any alien "whose removal was subsequent to a conviction for commission of three or more misdemeanors involving drugs, crimes against the person, or both, or a felony (other than an aggravated felony) . shall be fined under Title 18, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both."
While Tzacir-Garcia has completed his sentence, this issue is not moot because a conviction under § 1326(b)(2) has the collateral consequence of rendering an alien permanently inadmissible to the United States. See United States v. Ovalle-Garcia , 868 F.3d 313, 314 (5th Cir. 2017).