Case Name: Joisse A. CAGEY and Dale J. Cagey, Her Husband, Petitioners v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation, a Commonwealth Agency, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2016-12-13
Citations: 164 A.3d 459
Docket Number: No. 329 WAL 2016
Parties: Joisse A. CAGEY and Dale J. Cagey, Her Husband, Petitioners v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation, a Commonwealth Agency, Respondent
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 164
Pages: 459–459

Head Matter:
Joisse A. CAGEY and Dale J. Cagey, Her Husband, Petitioners v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation, a Commonwealth Agency, Respondent
No. 329 WAL 2016
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
December 13, 2016

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 13th day of December, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Has [the] Commonwealth Court improperly expanded this Court's holding in Dean v. Department of Transportation, 751 A.2d 1130 (Pa. 2000)[,] that the Department has no duty to erect guardrails on Commonwealth real property along Commonwealth agency roadways, by repeatedly holding that when the Department does erect guardrails, it cannot be liable for injuries caused by negligently dangerously designed guardrails?