Case Name: DEL MONTE DUNES AT MONTEREY, LTD., et al., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF MONTEREY, Defendant-Appellant; DEL MONTE DUNES AT MONTEREY, LTD., and Monterey-Del Monte Dunes Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF MONTEREY, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1997-10-28
Citations: 127 F.3d 1149
Docket Number: Nos. 94-16248, 94-16313
Parties: DEL MONTE DUNES AT MONTEREY, LTD., et al., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF MONTEREY, Defendant-Appellant. DEL MONTE DUNES AT MONTEREY, LTD., and Monterey-Del Monte Dunes Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF MONTEREY, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before: WALLACE and LEAVY, Circuit Judges, and BAIRD, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 127
Pages: 1149–1149

Head Matter:
DEL MONTE DUNES AT MONTEREY, LTD., et al., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF MONTEREY, Defendant-Appellant. DEL MONTE DUNES AT MONTEREY, LTD., and Monterey-Del Monte Dunes Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF MONTEREY, Defendant-Appellee.
Nos. 94-16248, 94-16313.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Oct. 28, 1997.
Before: WALLACE and LEAVY, Circuit Judges, and BAIRD, District Judge.
Honorable Lourdes G. Baird, United States District Judge, Central District of California, sitting by designation,

Opinion:
The panel reheard oral argument in this case August 6,1996. The panel has voted not to amend its opinion. The panel has unanimously recommended that the suggestion for rehearing en banc be rejected.
The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc. An active judge called for an en banc vote and a majority of the judges of the court has voted to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35(b).
The opinion in this case will not be amended, and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is rejected.