Case Name: Terry JOHNSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jean HILL, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-12-11
Citations: 358 F. App'x 913
Docket Number: No. 07-36083
Parties: Terry JOHNSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jean HILL, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 358
Pages: 913–913

Head Matter:
Terry JOHNSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jean HILL, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 07-36083.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 17, 2009.
Filed Dec. 11, 2009.
Kristina Heilman, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Portland, OR, for Petitioner-Appellant.
Office of the Oregon Attorney General, Salem, OR, for Respondent-Appellee.
Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Oregon state prisoner Terry Johnson appeals from the district court's judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.
Johnson contends that the trial court violated his Sixth Amendment rights by imposing consecutive sentences based on factual findings that were not proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Our independent review of the record, see Larson v. Palmateer, 515 F.3d 1057, 1062 (9th Cir.2008), indicates that the state courts' rejection of Johnson's Sixth Amendment claim was not contrary to, and did not involve an unreasonable application of, clearly established Supreme Court law. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1); see also Oregon v. Ice, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 711, 714-15, 172 L.Ed.2d 517 (2009); Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.