Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darryle Edward ROBERTSON, a/k/a Tiger, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-12-19
Citations: 588 F. App'x 252
Docket Number: No. 14-7329
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darryle Edward ROBERTSON, a/k/a Tiger, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before DUNCAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 588
Pages: 252–252

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darryle Edward ROBERTSON, a/k/a Tiger, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 14-7329.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 16, 2014.
Decided: Dec. 19, 2014.
Darryle Edward Robertson, Appellant Pro Se. John- Francis Purcell, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Stephen Schenning, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before DUNCAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Darryle Edward Robertson, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court's order rescinding the order granting his motion for appointment of counsel. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Robertson seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appeal-able interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.