Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan FIERROS-BRACAMONTES, Defendant-Appellant; United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Fierros-Bracamontes, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-11-04
Citations: 298 F. App'x 611
Docket Number: Nos. 05-10519, 05-10521
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan FIERROS-BRACAMONTES, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Fierros-Bracamontes, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: HAWKINS, RAWLINSON, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 298
Pages: 611–612

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan FIERROS-BRACAMONTES, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Fierros-Bracamontes, Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 05-10519, 05-10521.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 28, 2008 .
Filed Nov. 4, 2008.
Elizabeth R. Berenguer, Esq., USTUOffice of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Juan Fierros-Bracamontes, Adelanto, CA, pro se.
Myrna Rodriguez Beards, Esq., Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: HAWKINS, RAWLINSON, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
In these consolidated appeals, Juan Fierros-Bracamontes appeals from his guilty-plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and from the revocation of supervised release. We dismiss the appeals.
Fierros-Bracamontes contends that the district court erred by denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea and that the appeal waiver in his plea agreement is unenforceable because he did not know or understand the terms of incarceration he faced under the agreement. We conclude that Fierros-Bracamontes entered into his plea agreement knowingly and voluntarily. Accordingly, we dismiss in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182-83 (9th Cir. 2000); United States v. Michlin, 34 F.3d 896, 899 (9th Cir.1994); see also United States v. Jeronimo, 398 F.3d 1149, 1153-54 (9th Cir.2005).
Fierros-Bracamontes's contention regarding the revocation of supervised release is moot because he has completed his sentence. See United States v. Palomba, 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir.1999).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.