Case Name: William H. T. CARNEY, Appellant, v. Thomas S. GATES, Jr., Secretary of Defense et al., Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1961-03-02
Citations: 288 F.2d 161
Docket Number: No. 15578
Parties: William H. T. CARNEY, Appellant, v. Thomas S. GATES, Jr., Secretary of Defense et al., Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 288
Pages: 161–161

Head Matter:
William H. T. CARNEY, Appellant, v. Thomas S. GATES, Jr., Secretary of Defense et al., Appellees.
No. 15578.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued Dec. 19, 1960.
Decided March 2, 1961.
Mr. George C. Dreos, Washington, D. C., for appellant.
Mr. David L. Rose, Atty., Dept, of Justice, with whom Asst. Atty. Gen. George C. Doub, Messrs. Oliver Gasch, U. S. Atty., and Morton Hollander, Atty., Dept, of Justice, were on the brief, for appellees. Mr. Carl W. Belcher, Asst. U. S. Atty., also entered an appearance for appellees.
Before Bazelon, Bagman and Burger, Circuit Judges.
Circuit Judge Bastian did not participate in the hearing of this case but counsel for the parties stipulated, that in case of disagreement between the two hearing judges as to disposition of the appeal, the case would be submitted to him on the briefs. The two hearing judges were in agreement but decided, nevertheless, to submit the case on the briefs to Circuit Judge Bastian, who joins in this opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Challenging his removal from service as a non-veteran civilian employee of the Department of the Army, appellant sued for a declaratory judgment in the District Court. The appellees moved for summary judgment and, in the alternative, for judgment on the pleadings on grounds of laches. The court granted the motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint. We affirm the dismissal on the ground that the suit is barred by laches. United States ex rel. Arant v. Lane, 1919, 249 U.S. 367, 39 S.Ct. 293, 63 L.Ed. 650; Drown v. Higley, 1957, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 326, 244 F.2d 774; Wunderle v. Kimball, 1952, 91 U.S.App.D.C. 394, 201 F.2d 707.
Affirmed.