Case Name: City of Hollywood, a Municipal Corporation, Plaintiff in Error, v. State ex rel. Davis, Attorney General, and Salida Investment Company, et al. Defendants in Error
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1941-04-08
Citations: 146 Fla. 560
Docket Number: 
Parties: City of Hollywood, a Municipal Corporation, Plaintiff in Error, v. State ex rel. Davis, Attorney General, and Salida Investment Company, et al. Defendants in Error.
Judges: Brown, C. J., Whitfield, Terrell, Buford, Chapman, Thomas and Adams, J. J., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 146
Pages: 560–560

Head Matter:
City of Hollywood, a Municipal Corporation, Plaintiff in Error, v. State ex rel. Davis, Attorney General, and Salida Investment Company, et al. Defendants in Error.
1 So. (2nd) 574
En Banc
Opinion Filed April 8, 1941
John W. Whelan, for Plaintiff in Error;
/. Tom W,atson, Attorney General, and Chas. H: Crim, for Defendants in Error.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This is a quo warranto proceeding to oust certain lands from the jurisdiction of the City of Dania and the City of Hollywood. The Court below granted the relief prayed for. The record and the briefs have been examined and each question raised carefully considered but we find nothing that has not been adjudicated by former opinions on the subject. The judgment appealed from was fair and just and is in all respects affirmed.
Affirmed.
Brown, C. J., Whitfield, Terrell, Buford, Chapman, Thomas and Adams, J. J., concur.