Case Name: WAYNE PROWITZ, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. RIDGEFIELD PARK VILLAGE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT; KATHLEEN DUNLEAVY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. RIDGEFIELD PARK VILLAGE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1991-01-28
Citations: 122 N.J. 199
Docket Number: 
Parties: WAYNE PROWITZ, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. RIDGEFIELD PARK VILLAGE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. KATHLEEN DUNLEAVY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. RIDGEFIELD PARK VILLAGE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 122
Pages: 199–202

Head Matter:
584 A.2d 782
WAYNE PROWITZ, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. RIDGEFIELD PARK VILLAGE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. KATHLEEN DUNLEAVY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. RIDGEFIELD PARK VILLAGE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Argued November 5, 1990
Decided January 28, 1991.
Thomas W. Dunn argued the cause for appellant (Beattie Padovano, attorneys; Thomas W. Dunn and Susan Anisfield Vallarlo, attorneys; and Martin T. Durkin, on the briefs).
Brian T. Campion argued the cause for respondents (Hartmann, Brooks, Van Dam & Sinisi, attorneys).
Douglas K. Wolfson argued the cause for amicus curiae Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. (Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith, Ravin, Davis & Bergstein, attorneys).
Stephen Eisdorfer, Assistant Deputy Public Advocate, argued the cause for amicus curiae Public Advocate of New Jersey (Wilfredo Caraballo, Public Advocate, attorney).
Donald M. Palombi, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for amicus curiae Council on Affordable Housing (Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Joseph L. Yannotti, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel).
John M. Payne submitted a letter in lieu of brief on behalf of amicus curiae Alliance for Affordable Housing, Inc.
Robert M. Washburn submitted a letter on behalf of amicus curiae The Institute of Multi-Family Housing of New Jersey, Inc. (Sherman, Silverstein & Kohl, attorneys).
Fred G. Stickel, III, submitted a letter in lieu of brief on behalf of amici curiae New Jersey State League of Municipalities and New Jersey Institute of Municipal Attorneys (Stickel, Koenig & Sullivan, attorneys).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 237 NJ.Super. 435, 568 A.2d 114 (1989).