Case Name: BASALITE CONCRETE PRODUCTS, LLC; Pacific Coast Building Products, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA; Chartis Specialty Insurance Company, formerly known as American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-09-04
Citations: 615 F. App'x 894
Docket Number: No. 13-16223
Parties: BASALITE CONCRETE PRODUCTS, LLC; Pacific Coast Building Products, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA; Chartis Specialty Insurance Company, formerly known as American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: TALLMAN and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges and ROSENTHAL, District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 615
Pages: 894–894

Head Matter:
BASALITE CONCRETE PRODUCTS, LLC; Pacific Coast Building Products, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA; Chartis Specialty Insurance Company, formerly known as American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 13-16223.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Aug. 14, 2015.
Filed Sept. 4, 2015.
Jeffery Laun Caufield, Caufield & James, LLP, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
Daniel I. Graham, Jr., Esquire, Barbara Michaelides, Nicolaides Fink Thorpe Mi-chaelides Sullivan LLP, Chicago, IL, Seth J. Manfredi, Esquire, Gordon & Rees LLP, San Francisco, CA, Richard H. Nico-laides, Jr., Bates Carey Nicolaides LLP, Chicago, IL, Sara M. Thorpe, Esquire, Nicolaides Fink Thorpe Michaelides Sullivan LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: TALLMAN and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges and ROSENTHAL, District Judge.
The Honorable Lee H. Rosenthal, District Judge for the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
ORDER
We AFFIRM the district court and adopt as the basis for our decision the well-reasoned Memorandum and Order granting the motion to dismiss.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.