Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio Chester LEWIS, a/k/a Big Tony, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-04-30
Citations: 520 F. App'x 177
Docket Number: No. 13-6227
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio Chester LEWIS, a/k/a Big Tony, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before AGEE and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 520
Pages: 177–177

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio Chester LEWIS, a/k/a Big Tony, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-6227.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 25, 2013.
Decided: April 30, 2013.
Antonio Chester Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Wu, Assistant United States Attorney, Erik Sean Siebert, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before AGEE and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Antonio Chester Lewis appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction in his sentence based on Amendment 750 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (2010). We conclude that the district court properly determined that Lewis was ineligible for a sentence reduction because his sentencing range was determined by his career offender designation, not the drug quantities attributable to him, and thus was not impacted by Amendment 750. United States v. Munn, 595 F.3d 183, 187 (4th Cir.2010). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. United States v. Lewis, No. 3:05-cr-00107-JAG-1 (E.D.Va. Jan. 31, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.