Case Name: Pullen et al. v. McKee et al.
Court: Supreme Court of Indiana
Jurisdiction: Indiana
Decision Date: 1897-11-23
Citations: 149 Ind. 709
Docket Number: No. 18,276
Parties: Pullen et al. v. McKee et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Indiana Reports
Volume: 149
Pages: 709–709

Head Matter:
Pullen et al. v. McKee et al.
[No. 18,276.
Filed Nov. 23, 1897.
Rehearing denied Jan. 28, 1898.]
From the Marion Superior Court.
Affirmed.
F. J. Van Vorhis, W. W. Spencer, William Irwin and Kealing & Hugg, for appellants.
Eli F. Ritter and Jason E. Baker, for appellees.

Opinion:
Monks, J.
Appellees brought this action against appellants for damages and an injunction. The trial of said cause resulted in a final judgment in favor of appellees.
The only error assigned and not waived calls in question the action of the court in overruling appellants' motion for a new trial. The questions presented by the assignment of error depend upon the evidence. Counsel for appellees insist that the evidence is not in the record for the reason that it does not affirmatively appear from the record that the longhand manuscript of the evidence was filed in the clerk's office before it was incorporated in the bill of exceptions. It does not appear from the record that the longhand manuscript was filed in the clerk's office before it was embodied in the bill of exceptions. The evidence is not, therefore, in the record. Campbell v. State, 148 Ind. 527; Yellow Hammer, etc., Co. v. Carlin, 148 Ind. 68, and cases cited; Citizens Street R. R. Co. v. Sutton, 148 Ind. 169, and cases cited; Koons v. Beach, 147 Ind. 137, and cases cited; Hoover v. Weesner, 147 Ind. 510.
No available error appearing in the record, the judgment is affirmed.