Case Name: Thomas William BROWNING, Petitioner-Appellant, v. A. MANSUKHANI, Warden Federal Correctional Inst-Estill, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-02-27
Citations: 712 F. App'x 346
Docket Number: No. 17-7664
Parties: Thomas William BROWNING, Petitioner-Appellant, v. A. MANSUKHANI, Warden Federal Correctional Inst—Estill, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 712
Pages: 346–346

Head Matter:
Thomas William BROWNING, Petitioner-Appellant, v. A. MANSUKHANI, Warden Federal Correctional Inst—Estill, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 17-7664
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: February 22, 2018
Decided: February 27, 2018
Thomas William Browning, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Thomas William Browning appeals the district court's order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion. See Aikens v. Ingram, 652 F.3d 496, 501 (4th Cir. 2011) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process."'
AFFIRMED