Case Name: Andrew A. McKinney et al., Doing Business as Mt. Pleasant Appliance Co., Respondents, v. William J. Penachio et al., Individually and Doing Business as Complete Refrigerator Supply, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1947-10-31
Citations: 272 A.D.2d 1012
Docket Number: 
Parties: Andrew A. McKinney et al., Doing Business as Mt. Pleasant Appliance Co., Respondents, v. William J. Penachio et al., Individually and Doing Business as Complete Refrigerator Supply, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 272
Pages: 1012–1013

Head Matter:
Andrew A. McKinney et al., Doing Business as Mt. Pleasant Appliance Co., Respondents, v. William J. Penachio et al., Individually and Doing Business as Complete Refrigerator Supply, Appellants.

Opinion:
The documentary proof creates a triable issue as to whether the earlier overriding commission contract, upon which this action is based, was rescinded and waived. Accordingly the motion for summary judgment should have been denied. Judgment and order appealed, from unanimously reversed, with costs to the appellants, and the motion for summary judgment denied. Present — Peck, P. J., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.