Case Name: Herman Howe, Respondent, v. Paul C. Helmick et al., Appellants
Court: Washington Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Washington
Decision Date: 1959-02-19
Citations: 53 Wash. 2d 829
Docket Number: No. 34769
Parties: Herman Howe, Respondent, v. Paul C. Helmick et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Washington Reports
Volume: 53
Pages: 829–829

Head Matter:
[No. 34769.
Department Two.
February 19, 1959.]
Herman Howe, Respondent, v. Paul C. Helmick et al., Appellants.
Skeel, McKelvy, Henke, Evenson & Uhlmann and Stanley J. Mitchell, for appellants.
. Michael K. Copass, Lycette, Diamond & Sylvester and Lyle L. Iversen, for respondent.
Reported in 335 P. (2d) 598.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The plaintiff brought this action for attorney fees. The defendants called for a jury. They have appealed from the judgment entered on the jury's verdict.
Their single assignment of error is that the trial court erred in denying their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. No exceptions were taken to the instructions. The evidence is in conflict.
We are able to say that the record supports the verdict, and, accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.