Case Name: Solomon STEVENS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2019-06-07
Citations: 270 So. 3d 1292
Docket Number: Case No. 5D19-372
Parties: Solomon STEVENS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 270
Pages: 1292–1292

Head Matter:
Solomon STEVENS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Case No. 5D19-372
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Opinion filed June 7, 2019
Solomon Stevens, Clermont, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We issued a Spencer show cause order directing Appellant to demonstrate why he should not be prohibited from filing any appeal, petition, pleading, or motion pertaining to the conviction and sentence rendered in Case No. 35-1989-CF-001711 unless reviewed and signed by an attorney licensed to practice in the State of Florida. Having failed to file a response and thus failing to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed, we conclude that Appellant is abusing the judicial process and should be barred from further pro se filings.
Therefore, in order to conserve judicial resources, we prohibit Appellant from filing with this Court any further pro se pleadings concerning Lake County Fifth Judicial Circuit case number 35-1989-CF-001711. The Clerk of this Court is directed not to accept any further pro se filings concerning this case and not to accept any telephone or in-person communications. Any further pleadings regarding this case will be summarily rejected by the Clerk, unless they are filed by a member in good standing with The Florida Bar. See Isley v. State, 652 So. 2d 409, 411 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) ("Enough is enough.").
FURTHER PRO SE FILINGS PROHIBITED.
HARRIS, GROSSHANS and SASSO, JJ., concur.
State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999).