Case Name: Mary Alice MAININI, d/b/a Check Express, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Craig MORRISON, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-03-21
Citations: 186 S.W.3d 483
Docket Number: No. ED 86163
Parties: Mary Alice MAININI, d/b/a Check Express, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Craig MORRISON, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 186
Pages: 483–484

Head Matter:
Mary Alice MAININI, d/b/a Check Express, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Craig MORRISON, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 86163.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
March 21, 2006.
Emily E. (Quandt) Kahn, Katharyn B. Davis, LLC, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Jonathan E. Fortman, Law Office of Jonathan E. Fortman, LLC, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a judgment in plaintiffs favor on plaintiffs petition to recover damages for returned checks under section 570.123 RSMo (2000). The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).