Case Name: John W. McCUAIG, III, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-06-01
Citations: 14 S.W.3d 612
Docket Number: No. 75122
Parties: John W. McCUAIG, III, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before: PAUL J. SIMON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 14
Pages: 612–612

Head Matter:
John W. McCUAIG, III, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. 75122.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
June 1, 1999.
Jennifer S. Walsh, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Linda Lemke, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before: PAUL J. SIMON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
John McCuaig, movant, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court's judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).