Case Name: Alfred CIFFO, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Keen & Battle Insurance, Inc., a Florida corporation, and Frank Bein, Appellees, v. KEEN & BATTLE INSURANCE, INC. and Frank Bein, Cross-Appellants
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-04-11
Citations: 560 So. 2d 265
Docket Number: No. 88-0483
Parties: Alfred CIFFO, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. FIREMAN’S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Keen & Battle Insurance, Inc., a Florida corporation, and Frank Bein, Appellees, v. KEEN & BATTLE INSURANCE, INC. and Frank Bein, Cross-Appellants.
Judges: ANSTEAD, STONE and POLEN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 560
Pages: 265–265

Head Matter:
Alfred CIFFO, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. FIREMAN’S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Keen & Battle Insurance, Inc., a Florida corporation, and Frank Bein, Appellees, v. KEEN & BATTLE INSURANCE, INC. and Frank Bein, Cross-Appellants.
No. 88-0483.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
April 11, 1990.
Clarification Denied May 30, 1990.
Edward A. Perse of Horton, Perse & Ginsberg and Jeffrey M. Liggio, Miami, for appellant/cross-appellee.
Henry T. Wihnyk and Neil Rose of Con-roy, Simberg & Lewis, P.A., Hollywood, for appellees/cross-appellants, Keen & Battle Ins., Inc. and Frank Bein.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We reverse a judgment entered on renewed defense motions for directed verdict based upon the two year statute of limitations for professional malpractice. In Pierce v. AALL Ins. Inc., 531 So.2d 84 (Fla.1988), decided after the trial court ruling here, it was determined that an insurance agent is not a professional for the purposes of the statute. We cannot discern from this limited record whether the trial court considered the other post judgment motions mooted by its ruling. Therefore, upon remand, prior to entering an order reinstating the verdict, the trial court shall reconsider the defendants' pending motions for new trial and to apply set off. We do not address these issues.
ANSTEAD, STONE and POLEN, JJ., concur.