Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MATTHEW E. HUMPHREYS, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2006-05-31
Citations: 206 Or. App. 235
Docket Number: 03C-52038; A125840
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MATTHEW E. HUMPHREYS, Appellant.
Judges: Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Brewer, Chief Judge, and Rosenblum, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 206
Pages: 235–236

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted April 19,
convictions vacated and remanded for merger and resentencing; otherwise affirmed May 31,
petition for review denied November 21,2006 (342 Or 46)
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MATTHEW E. HUMPHREYS, Appellant.
03C-52038; A125840
136 P3d 75
Jossi Davidson argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Gracey & Davidson.
Susan Howe, Senior Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.
Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Brewer, Chief Judge, and Rosenblum, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant appeals his convictions of two counts of felony assault in the fourth degree. ORS 163.160. Those convictions arose from a single assaultive act by defendant against his wife that was committed in the presence of defendant's minor child and stepchild. Defendant raises four assignments of error. We reject the first three assignments without discussion.
In his fourth assignment, defendant assigns error to the trial court's denial of his motion to merge the two convictions. The state concedes that, under State v. Glaspey, 337 Or 558, 100 P3d 770 (2004), the trial court erred in denying defendant's motion to merge the convictions. We agree and therefore accept the state's concession.
Convictions vacated and remanded for merger and resentencing; otherwise affirmed.