Case Name: Village of Scarsdale, Appellant-Respondent, v. Thomas Carroll, Respondent-Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1996-04-15
Citations: 226 A.D.2d 524
Docket Number: 
Parties: Village of Scarsdale, Appellant-Respondent, v Thomas Carroll, Respondent-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 226
Pages: 524–525

Head Matter:
Village of Scarsdale, Appellant-Respondent, v Thomas Carroll, Respondent-Appellant.
[640 NYS2d 815]

Opinion:
In an action to recover on a promissory note, (1) the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Barone, J.), entered May 25, 1995, as denied its motion for summary judgment, and (2) the defendant cross-appeals from so much of the same order as denied his cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
We agree with the Supreme Court that there are material issues of fact which require a trial (see, CPLR 3212 [b]). Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.