Case Name: Henry Swift, Junior, Appellant, v. George W. Saulsberry, Respondent
Court: Washington Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Washington
Decision Date: 1910-06-23
Citations: 59 Wash. 163
Docket Number: No. 8722
Parties: Henry Swift, Junior, Appellant, v. George W. Saulsberry, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Washington Reports
Volume: 59
Pages: 163–163

Head Matter:
[No. 8722.
Department One.
June 23, 1910.]
Henry Swift, Junior, Appellant, v. George W. Saulsberry, Respondent.
Appeal — Bond—Amount—Dismissal. A bond on appeal in tbe sum of $200, conditioned also as a supersedeas bond, is ineffectual to perfect the appeal, which must be dismissed.
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King-county, Main, J., entered February 19, 1910.
Dismissed.
Charles R. Crouch, for appellant.
L. Y. Devries, for respondent.
Reported in 109 Pac. 305.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The appellant has moved to dismiss the appeal, for the reason that the appeal bond is not in form or substance such as to render the appeal effectual.
The point relied upon is that the bond is conditioned both as an appeal and supersedeas, and is in the penal sum of $£00. The motion- is granted. Hassett v. Fraternal Brotherhood, ante p. 161, 109 Pac. 805.
The dismissal of the appeal results in no prejudice to the appellant, as we would be required to affirm the case on the merits.