Case Name: Salame M. AMR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY; Eddie N. Moore, Jr.; Nasser Rashidi; Larry C. Brown; Keith M. Williamson, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-08-06
Citations: 331 F. App'x 194
Docket Number: No. 09-1184
Parties: Salame M. AMR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY; Eddie N. Moore, Jr.; Nasser Rashidi; Larry C. Brown; Keith M. Williamson, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 331
Pages: 194–195

Head Matter:
Salame M. AMR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY; Eddie N. Moore, Jr.; Nasser Rashidi; Larry C. Brown; Keith M. Williamson, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 09-1184.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 15, 2009.
Decided: Aug. 6, 2009.
Salame M. Amr, Appellant Pro Se. Gregory Clayton Fleming, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Salame M. Amr appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Amr v. Virginia State Univ., No. 3:07-cv-00628-REP, 2009 WL 112829 (E.D.Va. Jan. 14, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.