Case Name: CLEVELAND ARCADE CO. v. TALCOTT
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1926-10-25
Citations: 5 Ohio Law Abs. 268
Docket Number: No. 7593
Parties: CLEVELAND ARCADE CO. v. TALCOTT
Judges: (Levine, PJ., and Vickery, J., concur.)
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 5
Pages: 268–268

Head Matter:
CLEVELAND ARCADE CO. v. TALCOTT
Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist., Cuyahoga Co.
No. 7593.
Decided Oct. 25, 1926
Attorneys — A. P. Gustafson for Company; A. L. Talcott for defendant; all of Cleveland.

Opinion:
SULLIVAN, J.
Section 11725 GC. as amended reads as follows: — "Every person who lives with and is the head and sole support of a family, and every widow, may hold property exempt from execution, attachment or sale- - -.
(5) The tools and implements of the debtor-necessary for carrying on his or her profession, trade, or business, including agriculture -."
The question to be decided in this case is whether an attorney at law is entitled to the exemptions in case of levy of execution for indebtedness under the above section.
In the Cleveland Municipal Court a motion was made and sustained, declaring .Talcott an attorney at law entitled to exemptions where the property involved is a law library and other chattels in his law office necessary for the carrying on of his profession. Error was prosecuted and it was argued that books and office furniture cannot be denominated and designated as "tools and implements," as from their very nature, they imply chattels which are all mechanical contrivances in their nature. The Court of Appeals held:
1. A more liberal view than this is war-rantable under the construction which is applicable ot this statute; and that they are used in the sense of instrumentalities which are necessary for carrying on the profession.
2. The purpose of the statute is not to deprive persons designated therein of the us of the instrumentalities by which a living is madé, for that would be contrary to public policy and would deprive the head of a family for using those means necessary for the support of his family.
3.When the 'statute in question was amended, the work "profession" was inserted; and obviously the law is a profession and a library is a necessary appendage to the proper and successful practice thereof..
Judgment therefore affirmed and judgment for defendant in error.
(Levine, PJ., and Vickery, J., concur.)