Case Name: Archibold Stobo and his wife Complainants v. James Kinloch Defendant
Court: Court of Chancery of South Carolina
Jurisdiction: South Carolina
Decision Date: 1723-04-11
Citations: 1 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 304
Docket Number: 
Parties: Archibold Stobo and his wife Complainants v. James Kinloch Defendant
Judges: Present His Excellency The Governour, The Honourable Arthur Middleton, Ralph Izard, William Bull, William Gibbon, Charles Hart, Benjamin Schenckingh, Benjamin De la Conseillere, Esquires of His Majesty’s Honourable Council for Executing the Office of Chancellour. William Tunley Esq. Master of this Court.
Reporter: Records of the court of Chancery of South Carolina, 1671-1779
Volume: 1
Pages: 304–305

Head Matter:
Present His Excellency The Governour, The Honourable Arthur Middleton, Ralph Izard, William Bull, William Gibbon, Charles Hart, Benjamin Schenckingh, Benjamin De la Conseillere, Esquires of His Majesty’s Honourable Council for Executing the Office of Chancellour. William Tunley Esq. Master of this Court.
Archibold Stobo and his wife Complainants v. James Kinloch Defendant

Opinion:
Upon Motion of Mr. Carrington of the Complainant's Counsel, it was prayed That the Order of this Court of the Tenth instant, may be made ab solute, and the prayer o£ the Complainant's Petition accordingly granted; But on hearing what was alledged by Mr. Whitaker and Mr. Hume of Counsel with the Defendant to the contrary, This Court after full consideration of the matter, doth think fit to dismiss the said Petition: forasmuch as the Defendant is present in this Province, and the Case does not properly lye before this Court; The Plaintiffs having remedy against the Defendant at Law, for any Cause of Action.
Intr.
Tho. Lamboll Deputy Register