Case Name: Old Dominion Iron & Nail Works Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company and City of Richmond
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1917-01-29
Citations: 242 U.S. 623
Docket Number: No. 378
Parties: Old Dominion Iron & Nail Works Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company and City of Richmond.
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 242
Pages: 623–623

Head Matter:
No. 378.
Old Dominion Iron & Nail Works Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company and City of Richmond.
In error to the Supreme Court of Appeals of the State of Virginia.
Motion to dismiss submitted January 15, 1917.
Decided January 29, 1917.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Leathe v. Thomas, 207 U. S. 93; Mellon Company v. McCafferty, 239 U. S. 134; (2) Pierce v. Southern Railway, 171 U. S. 641; Preston v. Chicago, 226 U. S. 447, 450; Wood v. Chesbrough, 228 U. S. 672, 677; (3) Moran v. Horsky, 178 U. S. 205. Mr. Eppa Hunton, Jr., Mr. E. Randolph Williams and Mr. Henry W. Anderson for the plaintiff in error. Mr. H. R. Pollard and Mr. Henry Taylor, Jr., for the defendants in error.