Case Name: In the Interest of K.D.W. and R.B.W., Plaintiff; B.E. and C.A.E., Respondent, v. J.W. (Natural Mother), Appellant; R.S. (Father), Defendant; C.B. (Father), Defendant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-10-22
Citations: 87 S.W.3d 50
Docket Number: No. WD 61273
Parties: In the Interest of K.D.W. and R.B.W., Plaintiff; B.E. and C.A.E., Respondent, v. J.W. (Natural Mother), Appellant; R.S. (Father), Defendant; C.B. (Father), Defendant.
Judges: Before EDWIN H. SMITH, P.J., LOWENSTEIN and HARDWICK, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 87
Pages: 50–51

Head Matter:
In the Interest of K.D.W. and R.B.W., Plaintiff; B.E. and C.A.E., Respondent, v. J.W. (Natural Mother), Appellant; R.S. (Father), Defendant; C.B. (Father), Defendant.
No. WD 61273.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Oct. 22, 2002.
Karen L. Rosenberg, Kansas City, for appellant.
Gerald F. McGonagle, Kansas City, for respondent.
Mary S. Mann, Kansas City, Attorney and Guardian for K.D.W. and R.B.W.
Before EDWIN H. SMITH, P.J., LOWENSTEIN and HARDWICK, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant mother's parental rights were terminated in an adoption proceeding filed by potential adoptive parents under § 453.040(7), RSMo 2000. The judgment of termination prior to adoption, on grounds of abuse and neglect, under § 211.447.4(2), was supported by clear, cogent and convincing evidence, and termination was in the best interest of the children. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
. All statutory references are to the Revised Statutes of Missouri 2000, unless otherwise indicated.