Case Name: Gloria WAGNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-04-17
Citations: 177 F. App'x 625
Docket Number: No. 05-15864
Parties: Gloria WAGNER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before: SILVERMAN, MCKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 177
Pages: 625–626

Head Matter:
Gloria WAGNER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
No. 05-15864.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 13, 2006.
Decided April 17, 2006.
Gloria Wagner, VSPW—Valley State Prison for Women, Chowchilla, CA, pro se.
Before: SILVERMAN, MCKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Former California state prisoner Gloria Wagner appeal pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violations of her First and Fourteenth Amendment rights. We review de novo, Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir.1998) (order), and we affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Wagner's action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). See id. Even after she amended her complaint three times, Wagner's allegations were too vague and conclusory to state a civil rights claim. See Ivey v. Board of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir.1982).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.