Case Name: VINCENT J. MURPHY, RESPONDENT, v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF NEWARK, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1938-09-16
Citations: 121 N.J.L. 75
Docket Number: 
Parties: VINCENT J. MURPHY, RESPONDENT, v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF NEWARK, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 121
Pages: 75–75

Head Matter:
VINCENT J. MURPHY, RESPONDENT, v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF NEWARK, APPELLANT.
Argued May 19, 1938
Decided September 16, 1938.
Ror the respondent, Thomas W. Parsonnet.
Ror the appellant, James F. X. O’Brien.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Donges in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Walker, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.