Case Name: In the Matter of the Marriage of JACOBSON, Appellant, and JACOBSON, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1987-09-16
Citations: 87 Or. App. 434
Docket Number: 87047; CA A36935
Parties: In the Matter of the Marriage of JACOBSON, Appellant, and JACOBSON, Respondent.
Judges: VAN HOOMISSEN, J.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 87
Pages: 434–438

Head Matter:
On respondent’s reconsideration filed August 11,
reconsideration allowed and former opinion (84 Or App 704, 735 P2d 627) adhered to September 16,
petition for review denied November 3, 1987 (304 Or 311)
In the Matter of the Marriage of JACOBSON, Appellant, and JACOBSON, Respondent.
(87047; CA A36935)
742 P2d 691
Clayton C. Patrick, Salem, and J. David Coughlinj Baker, for petition.
VAN HOOMISSEN, J.
Rossman, J., dissenting.

Opinion:
VAN HOOMISSEN, J.
Father petitions for reconsideration of our decision in this case. See Jacobson and Jacobson, 84 Or App 704, 735 P2d 627 (1987). We grant reconsideration solely to consider a trial court exhibit (Exhibit U) which we did not consider before because we found that it was not part of the record on appeal. See 84 Or App at 707 n 2. Father's motion to supplement the record to include Exhibit U had been allowed; however, the exhibit had not been transmitted to us by the trial court. It has now been transmitted.
We have reexamined the record, including Exhibit U, and adhere to our original decision.