Case Name: Pete McMANUS, Appellant, v. STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1987-09-16
Citations: 512 So. 2d 344
Docket Number: No. 4-86-2168
Parties: Pete McMANUS, Appellant, v. STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.
Judges: WALDEN and STONE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 512
Pages: 344–344

Head Matter:
Pete McMANUS, Appellant, v. STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.
No. 4-86-2168.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Sept. 16, 1987.
Pete McManus, pro se.
Brian C. Powers, of Law Offices of Brian C. Powers, P.A., Lake Worth, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We reverse and remand. Although the trial court properly granted the motion to dismiss appellant's pro se complaint, the record fails to reflect sufficient justification for a dismissal with prejudice. Delia & Wilson, Inc. v. Wilson, 448 So.2d 621 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).
WALDEN and STONE, JJ., concur.
LETTS, J., dissents with opinion.