Case Name: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Jerome WILLIAMS, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-04-08
Citations: 616 So. 2d 51
Docket Number: No. 81079
Parties: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Jerome WILLIAMS, Respondent.
Judges: BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 616
Pages: 51–51

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Jerome WILLIAMS, Respondent.
No. 81079.
Supreme Court of Florida.
April 8, 1993.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and James W. Rogers, Bureau Chief — Criminal Appeals, and Carolyn J. Mosley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for petitioner.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Second Judicial Circuit, Tallahassee, for respondent.

Opinion:
SHAW, Justice.
We have for review Williams v. State, 608 So.2d 887 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), wherein the district court certified a question of great public importance. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We have since answered the question in State v. Rucker, 613 So.2d 460 (Fla.1993). We quash Williams and remand for proceedings consistent with Rucker.
It is so ordered.
BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.