Case Name: Sarah Lourdes LLORENS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2008-06-13
Citations: 983 So. 2d 772
Docket Number: No. 5D07-3506
Parties: Sarah Lourdes LLORENS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ORFINGER, TORPY and COHEN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 983
Pages: 772–773

Head Matter:
Sarah Lourdes LLORENS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D07-3506.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
June 13, 2008.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Kevin R. Holtz, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Ap-pellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We find the court did not abuse its authority in ordering restitution. See Glaubius v. State, 688 So.2d 913 (Fla.1997); State v. Hawthorne, 573 So.2d 330 (Fla.1991). The State concedes that a mathematical error was made in the amount ordered and that the proper amounts should have been $1168.72 for the necklace and $443.04 for the stereo. We herewith amend the judgment accordingly. See Lamb v. State, 732 So.2d 350 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999).
AFFIRMED; Judgment AMENDED.
ORFINGER, TORPY and COHEN, JJ., concur.