Case Name: Nancy A. WHITE, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated, Respondent v. CONESTOGA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2010-05-19
Citations: 994 A.2d 1083
Docket Number: 
Parties: Nancy A. WHITE, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated, Respondent v. CONESTOGA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 994
Pages: 1083–1083

Head Matter:
Nancy A. WHITE, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated, Respondent v. CONESTOGA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
May 19, 2010.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 19th day of May 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
In reversing the Common Pleas Court's dismissal of this action for lack of jurisdiction by reason of the administrative remedy provided by the TICA at 40 P.S. § 910-44(b), did the Superior Court err by holding that the statutory and deci-sional rule that adequate administrative remedies are exclusive does not apply to consumer class actions?