Case Name: Elie Weill et al., App'lts. v. Joseph Malone et al., Resp'ts
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1891-12-14
Citations: 42 N.Y. St. Rep. 953
Docket Number: 
Parties: Elie Weill et al., App’lts. v. Joseph Malone et al., Resp’ts.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 42
Pages: 953–953

Head Matter:
Elie Weill et al., App’lts. v. Joseph Malone et al., Resp’ts.
Motion for re-argument.
James O. Ohurch, for motion; Frederic S. Barnum, opposed.

Opinion:
Dykman, J.
This is a motion for a re-argument in this court, but there is no reason why the motion should be granted.
There was no oversight in making the decision, and the motion should be denied, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Barnard, P. J., concurs.