Case Name: Anthony TABORN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2018-03-27
Citations: 543 S.W.3d 84
Docket Number: WD 80540
Parties: Anthony TABORN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 543
Pages: 84–84

Head Matter:
Anthony TABORN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
WD 80540
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
ORDER FILED: March 27, 2018
Steven B. Willibey, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
Julia E. Neidhardt, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before Division Four: Mark D. Pfeiffer, Chief Judge, Presiding, Cynthia L. Martin, Judge and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judge
ORDER

Opinion:
Per curiam:
Anthony L. Taborn appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion and argues that it was error to deny his claim that appellate counsel was ineffective when she failed to raise a claim of error on direct appeal involving the admission of uncharged misconduct evidence at trial. Because appellate counsel's strategic decision not to raise this issue on direct appeal was reasonable, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).