Case Name: Daniel HORGAN, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. BARNES HOSPITAL and Barnes St. Peters Hospital, Defendants/Appellants
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1996-07-30
Citations: 930 S.W.2d 35
Docket Number: No. 68155
Parties: Daniel HORGAN, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. BARNES HOSPITAL and Barnes St. Peters Hospital, Defendants/Appellants.
Judges: Before GERALD M. SMITH, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 930
Pages: 35–36

Head Matter:
Daniel HORGAN, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. BARNES HOSPITAL and Barnes St. Peters Hospital, Defendants/Appellants.
No. 68155.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
July 30, 1996.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Sept. 9,1996.
Application to Transfer Denied Oct. 22,1996.
Kathleen L. Pine, Sandberg, Phoenix & Von Gontard, P.C., St. Louis, for defendants/appellants.
George L. Fitzsimmons, Gray & Ritter, P.C., St. Louis, for plaintiff/respondent.
Before GERALD M. SMITH, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM.
Defendants appeal from a judgment based upon a jury verdict in a medical malpractice case. The evidence in support of the jury verdict is not insufficient and no error of law appears. An opinion would have no prece- dential value. The parties have been furnished with a statement of the reasons for our affirmance. The judgment is affirmed in compliance with Rule 84.16(b).