Case Name: In re Donald H. BAILEY, Debtor. Hako-Med USA, Inc., Plaintiff, Kai Hansjurgens, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald H. Bailey, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-09-14
Citations: 489 F. App'x 425
Docket Number: No. 11-14251
Parties: In re Donald H. BAILEY, Debtor. Hako-Med USA, Inc., Plaintiff, Kai Hansjurgens, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald H. Bailey, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before HULL, EDMONDSON and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Bankruptcy Reporter
Volume: 485
Pages: 425–425

Head Matter:
In re Donald H. BAILEY, Debtor. Hako-Med USA, Inc., Plaintiff, Kai Hansjurgens, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald H. Bailey, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 11-14251
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Sept. 14, 2012.
Kai Hansjurgens, Honolulu, HI, pro se.
C. James MeCallar, Jr., McCallar Law Firm, Savannah, GA, for Defendant-Ap-pellee.
Before HULL, EDMONDSON and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Kai Hansjurgens, a creditor proceeding pro se, appeals from the district court's dismissal of his appeal of the bankruptcy court's interlocutory order finding him liable on Donald Bailey's related claims, pursuant to Fed.R.Bankr.P. 8009(1)(1). This Court does not have to decide whether the district court abused its discretion by dismissing Hansjurgens's appeal for want of prosecution because he never received leave to appeal the bankruptcy court's interlocutory order. And the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying such leave where the bankruptcy court had by then entered a final judgment. The district court did not have jurisdiction to consider Hansjurgens's claims. We affirm the district court's order dismissing his appeal to that court.
AFFIRMED.