Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Michael C. HUGHES, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-01-08
Citations: 22 F. App'x 701
Docket Number: No. 01-1832
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Michael C. HUGHES, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 22
Pages: 701–702

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Michael C. HUGHES, Appellant.
No. 01-1832.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 4, 2002.
Decided Jan. 8, 2002.
Before BOWMAN, BRIGHT, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
[UNPUBLISHED]
PER CURIAM.
Michael C. Hughes pleaded guilty to attempted possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (1994), and the District Court sentenced him to fifty-one months' imprisonment and three years' supervised release. On appeal, Hughes argues that the Court failed to make factual findings at sentencing concerning his criminal history, and that it was required to do so given his objection to the presentence report (PSR).
After carefully reviewing the record, we cannot agree with Hughes that he objected to the PSR at sentencing. In fact, after the Court rejected a recommended victim-related enhancement, Hughes's counsel expressly informed the Court that Hughes had no other objection to the PSR. The Court therefore committed no error in adopting the rest of the PSR's factual findings. See Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(b)(6)(D) (stating that District Court may accept unob-jeeted-to portions of PSR).
Accordingly, we affirm.
. The Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.