Case Name: James MAULLER and Katherine Mauller, Appellants, v. Nona Lee DRESNER, et al., Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-06-27
Citations: 24 S.W.3d 762
Docket Number: No. ED 76747
Parties: James MAULLER and Katherine Mauller, Appellants, v. Nona Lee DRESNER, et al., Respondents.
Judges: Before: GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J., PAUL J. SIMON, J., and JAMES R. DOWD, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 24
Pages: 762–763

Head Matter:
James MAULLER and Katherine Mauller, Appellants, v. Nona Lee DRESNER, et al., Respondents.
No. ED 76747.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
June 27, 2000.
Philip E. Prewitt, St. Louis, for appellant.
Kenneth J. Feld, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before: GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J., PAUL J. SIMON, J., and JAMES R. DOWD, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiffs appeal the trial court's judgment for Respondent on Counts I, II, III, and IV of Plaintiffs' petition. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a brief memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).