Case Name: Ottie HOOKER v. PRODUCERS TRACTOR COMPANY, et al.
Court: Arkansas Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Arkansas
Decision Date: 1996-11-25
Citations: 326 Ark. 760
Docket Number: 96-851
Parties: Ottie HOOKER v. PRODUCERS TRACTOR COMPANY, et al.
Judges: NEWBERN, J., not participating.
Reporter: Arkansas Reports
Volume: 326
Pages: 760–761

Head Matter:
Ottie HOOKER v. PRODUCERS TRACTOR COMPANY, et al.
96-851
932 S.W.2d 111
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Opinion delivered November 25, 1996
Appellant, pro se.
Daggett, Van Dover, Donovan & Perry, PLLC, by: James R. Van Dover, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURLAM.
Petitioner Ottie Hooker petitions this court pro se to set aside its order of October 21, 1996, and to strike any motion to consolidate appeals made in his name. We take this opportunity to clarify and correct the procedural history of this case.
Appellant Hooker is pursuing two related appeals in the appellate courts: (1) Hooker v. Producers Tractor Co., et al., Supreme Court No. 96-851; and (2) Hooker v. Producers Tractor Co., et al., Court of Appeals No. 96-1069. On October 2, 1996, Hooker petitioned to have John Deere Credit added to his certificate of service in case number 96-851. The petition was granted. The Supreme Court Clerk's office named this petition as a motion to consolidate the two appeals and advised Hooker that the motion had been granted. Consolidating the two appeals was incorrect. We void the consolidation order.
On November 4, 1996, we dismissed Hooker's appeal in case number 96-851. Thus, his petition to add John Deere Credit to the certificate of service in that appeal is moot. The appeal in the Court of Appeals (number 96-1069) appears to be pending and was not dismissed by this court's action on November 4, 1996.
NEWBERN, J., not participating.
The 96-1069 case is styled in two ways: (1) Hooker v. Producers Tractor Co. (Hooker motion) and (2) Hooker v. Producers Tractor Co. & John Deere Credit (complaint).