Case Name: James A. ATCHISON, Respondent, v. PORTER POULTRY, INC., Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2014-02-04
Citations: 420 S.W.3d 676
Docket Number: No. ED 98634
Parties: James A. ATCHISON, Respondent, v. PORTER POULTRY, INC., Appellant.
Judges: Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., KURT S. ODENWALD, J., and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 420
Pages: 676–677

Head Matter:
James A. ATCHISON, Respondent, v. PORTER POULTRY, INC., Appellant.
No. ED 98634.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Feb. 4, 2014.
William Stuart Thomas, John Joseph Fischesser II, Co-Counsel, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Thomas Cicardi Devoto, Devoto Law Firm, Andrew William Kuhlmann, Co-Counsel, Kuhlmann LLC, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent (cross-appellant).
Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., KURT S. ODENWALD, J., and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Porter Poultry, Inc., (Porter Poultry) appeals from the trial court's judgment following a jury verdict in favor of James A. Atchison (Atchison) on Atchison's negligence claim against Porter Poultry. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
. Atchison initially filed a cross-appeal, which he subsequently dismissed.