Case Name: Nat ROGAN, Collector of Internal Revenue for the Sixth District of California, Appellant, and Appellee, v. Helen Franklin CUTTS, Appellee, and Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1940-12-16
Citations: 116 F.2d 800
Docket Number: No. 9698
Parties: Nat ROGAN, Collector of Internal Revenue for the Sixth District of California, Appellant, and Appellee, v. Helen Franklin CUTTS, Appellee, and Appellant.
Judges: Before GARRECHT, HANEY, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 116
Pages: 800–800

Head Matter:
Nat ROGAN, Collector of Internal Revenue for the Sixth District of California, Appellant, and Appellee, v. Helen Franklin CUTTS, Appellee, and Appellant.
No. 9698.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Dec. 16, 1940.
Wm. Fleet Palmer, U. S. Atty., E. H. Mitchell and Armond Monroe Jewell, Asst. U. S. Attys., all of Los Angeles, Cal., for Rogan, Collector.
Joseph D. Peeler, and James A. Miller, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for Helen Franklin Cutts.
Before GARRECHT, HANEY, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM. •
Pursuant to stipulation of counsel for respective parties, and good cause therefor appearing, ordered appeals herein dismissed, that a judgment of dismissal be filed and entered accordingly, and mandate of this court in this cause issue forthwith.