Case Name: In the Matter of Ronnie Allen, Appellant, v. Division of Human Rights et al., Respondents, and MTA New York City Transit, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2011-03-22
Citations: 82 A.D.3d 585
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Ronnie Allen, Appellant, v Division of Human Rights et al., Respondents, and MTA New York City Transit, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 82
Pages: 585–585

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Ronnie Allen, Appellant, v Division of Human Rights et al., Respondents, and MTA New York City Transit, Respondent.
[918 NYS2d 720]

Opinion:
The challenged determination that there existed no probable cause to believe that respondent New York City Transit Authority had engaged in age and/or national origin discrimination was rationally based and therefore not subject to judicial disturbance (see Gaskin v Westbourne Assoc., L.P., 59 AD3d 362 [2009]; Matter of Malone v New York City Commn. on Human Rights, 29 AD3d 364 [2006]; Matter of McFarland v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 241 AD2d 108 [1998]). Concur- — Tom, J.E, Andrias, Sweeny, Moskowitz and Renwick, JJ.