Case Name: STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, o/b/o Denise L. COOPER, Karen Parikh, Jodi Snyder, Carmen Floyd, Donna F. Judd, Angie Taylor, Gretchen Tobol, Brenda Rosado and Lisa Burgos, Appellant, v. Joseph D. COOPER, Creg C. Clark, James A. Woodby, Eddie J. Floyd, Ronald Seidl, James E. Taylor, Robert L. Tobol, Ervin M. Ruiz and Benjamin Vazquez, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2003-12-17
Citations: 861 So. 2d 519
Docket Number: Nos. 4D02-452 to 4D02-4533
Parties: STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, o/b/o Denise L. COOPER, Karen Parikh, Jodi Snyder, Carmen Floyd, Donna F. Judd, Angie Taylor, Gretchen Tobol, Brenda Rosado and Lisa Burgos, Appellant, v. Joseph D. COOPER, Creg C. Clark, James A. Woodby, Eddie J. Floyd, Ronald Seidl, James E. Taylor, Robert L. Tobol, Ervin M. Ruiz and Benjamin Vazquez, Appellees.
Judges: STONE, KLEIN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 861
Pages: 519–520

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, o/b/o Denise L. COOPER, Karen Parikh, Jodi Snyder, Carmen Floyd, Donna F. Judd, Angie Taylor, Gretchen Tobol, Brenda Rosado and Lisa Burgos, Appellant, v. Joseph D. COOPER, Creg C. Clark, James A. Woodby, Eddie J. Floyd, Ronald Seidl, James E. Taylor, Robert L. Tobol, Ervin M. Ruiz and Benjamin Vazquez, Appellees.
Nos. 4D02-452 to 4D02-4533.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Dec. 17, 2003.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and William H. Branch, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for appellant.
No appearance for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The Department of Revenue ("Department") appeals orders of the trial court dismissing the registration of nine out-of-state child support orders on the ground that the respondents were not served within the time allowed under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.070 and Family Law Rule of Procedure 12.070. In Department of Revenue v. Cuevas, No. 4D02-3710, 862 So.2d 810, 2003 WL 22850526 (Fla. 4th DCA Dec.3, 2003), this court considered the same issue and determined that the notice provision of the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act requires the registering tribunal to provide notice to the respondent and it was error to dismiss for the Department's failure to serve timely notice.
REVERSED for reinstatement of the registrations.
STONE, KLEIN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.