Case Name: Osvaldo VALDES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1999-04-07
Citations: 728 So. 2d 1225
Docket Number: No. 97-2896
Parties: Osvaldo VALDES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GODERICH and GREEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 728
Pages: 1225–1225

Head Matter:
Osvaldo VALDES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 97-2896.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 7, 1999.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Manuel Alvarez and Suzanne M. Froix, Assistant Public Defenders, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Sylvie Perez-Posner (Fort Lauderdale) and Consuelo Maingot, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GODERICH and GREEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
There is no merit either in the defendant's sole claim of trial error, see Watson v. State, 504 So.2d 1267 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), review denied, 506 So.2d 1043 (Fla.1987); Gosney v. State, 382 So.2d 838 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980), or in his challenge to the 1995 guidelines under which he was sentenced, based on a claim that Chapter 95-184, Laws of Florida, is unconstitutional. See Holloway v. State, 712 So.2d 439 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), review granted, 727 So.2d 906 (Fla.1998); Higgs v. State, 695 So.2d 872 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). The latter holding is in conflict with Thompson v. State, 708 So.2d 315 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), review granted, 717 So.2d 538 (Fla.1998). See Heggs v. State, 718 So.2d 263 (Fla. 2d DCA), review granted, 720 So.2d 518 (Fla.1998).
Affirmed.
SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GODERICH, J., concur.