Case Name: Ernestine & Charles POINER, Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. SHIRLEY LIQUOR STORES, INC., Charles M. Hinkle, R.A., & Charles M. Hinkle, Defendants/Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1993-02-23
Citations: 846 S.W.2d 801
Docket Number: No. 61987
Parties: Ernestine & Charles POINER, Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. SHIRLEY LIQUOR STORES, INC., Charles M. Hinkle, R.A., & Charles M. Hinkle, Defendants/Respondents.
Judges: Before AHRENS, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 846
Pages: 801–801

Head Matter:
Ernestine & Charles POINER, Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. SHIRLEY LIQUOR STORES, INC., Charles M. Hinkle, R.A., & Charles M. Hinkle, Defendants/Respondents.
No. 61987.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Feb. 23, 1993.
Michael R. Gibbons, Christian Stiegemeyer, Kirkwood, for appellant.
Respondent, pro se.
Before AHRENS, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant, whose property had been levied upon, appeals from an order denying his motion to quash execution. We affirm. No error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).