Case Name: Greg Waltman, Appellant, et al., Plaintiff, v. Time Warner Inc. et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2017-01-26
Citations: 146 A.D.3d 699
Docket Number: 
Parties: Greg Waltman, Appellant, et al., Plaintiff, v Time Warner Inc. et al., Respondents.
Judges: Concur — Friedman, J.P., Richter, Saxe, Moskowitz and Kapnick, JJ.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 146
Pages: 699–699

Head Matter:
Greg Waltman, Appellant, et al., Plaintiff, v Time Warner Inc. et al., Respondents.
[44 NYS3d 911]

Opinion:
Appeals from orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Debra A. James, J.), entered May 21, 2015 and October 2, 2015, which granted defendants' respective motion to dismiss the complaint and enjoined the individual plaintiff from initiating any further litigation on any claim against defendants without prior approval of the Administrative Judge of the court in which plaintiff seeks to bring further litigation, deemed to be appeals from the subsequent judgments (CPLR 5501 [c]), same court and Justice, entered February 10, 2016, and August 18, 2016 dismissing the complaint, and as so considered, said judgments unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiffs' complaint is barred under res judicata, since a judgment on the merits exists from a prior action between the same parties involving the same subject matter (Matter of Hunter, 4 NY3d 260, 269 [2005]).
The motion court properly enjoined the individual plaintiff to the extent indicated (Matter of Sud v Sud, 227 AD2d 319, 319 [1st Dept 1996]).
Concur — Friedman, J.P., Richter, Saxe, Moskowitz and Kapnick, JJ.