Case Name: Arlando VAIL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2014-06-03
Citations: 433 S.W.3d 476
Docket Number: No. ED 100611
Parties: Arlando VAIL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before: ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, C.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., J., and PHILIP M. HESS, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 433
Pages: 476–477

Head Matter:
Arlando VAIL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 100611.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Southern Division.
June 3, 2014.
Gwenda Renee Robinson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Jennifer A. Rodewald, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before: ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, C.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., J., and PHILIP M. HESS, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Arlando Vail appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under Mo. R.Crim. P. 29.15 (2013). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude an ex tended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2013).