Case Name: Harry G. SEABOLDT v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY v. THOMPSON MAHOGANY COMPANY, Third-Party Defendant, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1963-05-31
Citations: 317 F.2d 363
Docket Number: No. 14269
Parties: Harry G. SEABOLDT v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY v. THOMPSON MAHOGANY COMPANY, Third-Party Defendant, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 317
Pages: 363–363

Head Matter:
Harry G. SEABOLDT v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY v. THOMPSON MAHOGANY COMPANY, Third-Party Defendant, Appellant.
No. 14269.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued May 23, 1963.
Decided May 31, 1963.
See also 290 F.2d 296.
Lynn L. Detweiler, Philadelphia, Pa. (Swartz, Campbell & Henry, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.
F. Hastings Griffin, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa. (William J. Sharkey, Dechert, Price & Rhoads, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.
Before KALODNER, STALEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
On review of the record we find no error. The District Court's Order and Judgment dated October 26, 1962 will be affirmed.