Case Name: Anthony Jo-Allen McCOY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STOKES, Correctional Officer, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-11-17
Citations: 453 F. App'x 377
Docket Number: No. 11-6889
Parties: Anthony Jo-Allen McCOY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STOKES, Correctional Officer, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 453
Pages: 377–378

Head Matter:
Anthony Jo-Allen McCOY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STOKES, Correctional Officer, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 11-6889.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 15, 2011.
Decided: Nov. 17, 2011.
Anthony Jo-Allen McCoy, Appellant Pro Se. Lara Kate Jacobs, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Jo-Allen McCoy appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McCoy v. Stokes, No. 3:10-cv-00868-JRS, 2011 WL 2580638 (E.D. Va. June 29, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.