Case Name: In the Matter of Marcella S., Respondent, v. Karl T., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1996-03-04
Citations: 225 A.D.2d 557
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Marcella S., Respondent, v Karl T., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 225
Pages: 557–557

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Marcella S., Respondent, v Karl T., Appellant.
[639 NYS2d 86]

Opinion:
Contrary to the appellant's contention, the Family Court correctly determined that the defense of "contraceptive fraud" is not relevant to the issue of paternity (see, Matter of L. Pamela P. v Frank S., 59 NY2d 1).
We have considered the appellant's remaining contentions and find that they do not warrant reversal. Balletta, J. P., O'Brien, Ritter, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.