Case Name: Dawn O'CONNOR, Appellant, v. HERMANNHOF WINERY, INC., Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2007-10-16
Citations: 235 S.W.3d 596
Docket Number: No. ED 89316
Parties: Dawn O’CONNOR, Appellant, v. HERMANNHOF WINERY, INC., Respondent.
Judges: Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 235
Pages: 596–596

Head Matter:
Dawn O’CONNOR, Appellant, v. HERMANNHOF WINERY, INC., Respondent.
No. ED 89316.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Oct. 16, 2007.
Judy R. Ullmann, Nevada, MO, for appellant.
Michael J. Pitzer, Matthew A. Brown, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Dawn O'Connor appeals from the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Hermannhof Winery, Inc. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).