Case Name: Molly Rosenblum, Respondent, v. John F. Harrington, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1926-10
Citations: 218 A.D. 740
Docket Number: 
Parties: Molly Rosenblum, Respondent, v. John F. Harrington, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 218
Pages: 740–740

Head Matter:
Molly Rosenblum, Respondent, v. John F. Harrington, Appellant.

Opinion:
Motion to resettle order denied, with ten dollars costs to abide the event. After our decision in this action the defendant should have been permitted to interpose an answer, setting up as a defense the matters which he urged as a reason for vacating the proceedings previously had. The defendant should now be permitted to do this, and the plaintiff, through her attorney, expresses her entire willingness that this should "be done. The court can then determine the action upon common-law evidence. Present — Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Manning, Young and Lazansky, JJ.