Case Name: Frederick SPENCER, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Jennifer JOYCE, St. Louis City Circuit Attorney, Richard Gray, Jerry Lee, Thomas Irwin, Betty Battle Williams, Francis G. Slay, and Mark Lawson, in their official capacities as members of the St. Louis City Board of Police Commissioners, Defendants/Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2015-05-12
Citations: 466 S.W.3d 30
Docket Number: No. ED 102044
Parties: Frederick SPENCER, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Jennifer JOYCE, St. Louis City Circuit Attorney, Richard Gray, Jerry Lee, Thomas Irwin, Betty Battle Williams, Francis G. Slay, and Mark Lawson, in their official capacities as members of the St. Louis City Board of Police Commissioners, Defendants/Respondents.
Judges: Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 466
Pages: 30–31

Head Matter:
Frederick SPENCER, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Jennifer JOYCE, St. Louis City Circuit Attorney, Richard Gray, Jerry Lee, Thomas Irwin, Betty Battle Williams, Francis G. Slay, and Mark Lawson, in their official capacities as members of the St. Louis City Board of Police Commissioners, Defendants/Respondents.
No. ED 102044
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Filed: May 12, 2015
Frederick Spencer, Acting Pro Se.
Michael G. Mueth, Jr., St. Louis, MO, for Defendant/Respondent Joyce.
Denise G. McElvein, St. Louis, MO, for Defendants/Respondents Gray, Lee, Irwin, Williams, Slay, and Lawson.
Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Frederick Spencer (Appellant) appeals from the trial court judgment dismissing his Petition filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Jennifer Joyce, as St. Louis City Circuit Attorney; and Richard Gray, Jerry Lee, Thomas Irwin, Betty Battle Williams, Francis G. Slay, and Mark Lawson, in their official capacities as members of the.St. Louis City Board of Police Com missioners (collectively the Respondents). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court committed no error in dismissing Appellant's Petition against the Respondents. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).