Case Name: Arthur GUIDE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-10-10
Citations: 549 So. 2d 1153
Docket Number: No. 89-230
Parties: Arthur GUIDE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before NESBITT, LEVY and GERSTEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 549
Pages: 1153–1154

Head Matter:
Arthur GUIDE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 89-230.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 10, 1989.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Elliot H. Scherker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before NESBITT, LEVY and GERSTEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
On examination of the record and the state's confession of error, the sentence entered by the trial court without the required written statement delineating the reasons for departure from sentencing guidelines requires vacation of the sentence imposed upon the defendant and remand to the trial court for proper sentencing. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll); Roberts v. State, 547 So.2d 129 (Fla.1989).
It is so ordered.