Case Name: HAWTHORNE SAVINGS F.S.B.; Hawthorne Financial Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY OF ILLINOIS, Defendant-Appellant. Hawthorne Savings F.S.B.; Hawthorne Financial Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. M. Diane Koken, Insurance Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, in her capacity as Liquidator of Reliance Insurance Company, Intervenor-Appellant, Reliance Insurance Company of Illinois, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-08-24
Citations: 433 F.3d 1089
Docket Number: Nos. 03-55548, 03-55611
Parties: HAWTHORNE SAVINGS F.S.B.; Hawthorne Financial Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY OF ILLINOIS, Defendant-Appellant. Hawthorne Savings F.S.B.; Hawthorne Financial Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. M. Diane Koken, Insurance Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, in her capacity as Liquidator of Reliance Insurance Company, Intervenor-Appellant, Reliance Insurance Company of Illinois, Defendant.
Judges: Before BROWNING, PREGERSON, and BERZON,' Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 433
Pages: 1089–1090

Head Matter:
HAWTHORNE SAVINGS F.S.B.; Hawthorne Financial Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY OF ILLINOIS, Defendant-Appellant. Hawthorne Savings F.S.B.; Hawthorne Financial Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. M. Diane Koken, Insurance Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, in her capacity as Liquidator of Reliance Insurance Company, Intervenor-Appellant, Reliance Insurance Company of Illinois, Defendant.
Nos. 03-55548, 03-55611.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Dec. 6, 2004.
Filed Aug. 24, 2005.
Amended Jan. 13, 2006.
W. Wendell Hall, and Rosemarie Ka~ nusky, Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P., San Antonio, TX, Claudia Morehead and Robert S. Schulman, Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P., Los Angeles, CA, and Oscar Rey Rodriguez, Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P., Dallas, TX, for the defendant-appellant.
Pamela H. Woldow, Chief Counsel, Insurance Department, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Harrisburg, PA, for the intervenor-appellant.
Jeffrey A. Tidus and David P. Crochetiere, Baute & Tidus LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for the plaintiffs-appellees.
Before BROWNING, PREGERSON, and BERZON,' Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
The Opinion filed on August 24, 2005 and appearing at 421 F.3d 835 (9th Cir. 2005) is hereby amended as follows:
1) 421 F.3d at 852, Slip Op. p. 11371, third to last line: after "state court do" add "under the Uniform Insurers Liquidation Act (UILA), Cal. Ins. Code § 1064.1-.12"
2) 421 F.3d at 852, Slip Op. p. 11372, lines 5-6: replace "Uniform Insurers Liquidation Act (UILA), Cal. Ins. Code § 1064.1-.12" with "UILA"
3) 421 F.3d at 856, Slip Op. p. 11378, line 16: after "stay its proceedings" add "under the UILA"