Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Daryll JACKSON, Appellant; Daryll JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1993-07-13
Citations: 857 S.W.2d 520
Docket Number: Nos. 60360, 62239
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Daryll JACKSON, Appellant. Daryll JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before CARL R. GAERTNER, P.J., and CRANE and CRAHAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 857
Pages: 520–520

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Daryll JACKSON, Appellant. Daryll JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 60360, 62239.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
July 13, 1993.
Emily N. Blood, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Aundreia R. Alexander, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before CARL R. GAERTNER, P.J., and CRANE and CRAHAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals from his convictions of second degree assault and armed criminal action. Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evi-dentiary hearing.
An opinion reciting detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only. This memorandum sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).