Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Theodore HOWZE, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-02-24
Citations: 467 F. App'x 241
Docket Number: No. 11-7421
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Theodore HOWZE, Jr., Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 467
Pages: 241–242

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Theodore HOWZE, Jr., Defendant—Appellant.
No. 11-7421.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 13, 2012. .
Decided: Feb. 24, 2012.
Theodore Howze, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert J. Higdon, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Theodore Howze, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Howze, No. 3:98-cr-00299-GCM-1 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 22, 2011). We deny the motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.