Case Name: Stephen PETE on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, et al., Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA WELFARE AND RETIREMENT FUND OF 1950 et al., Appellants; Slimp KISER, on behalf of himself and all other similarly situated plaintiffs, et al. v. UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA WELFARE AND RETIREMENT FUND OF 1950, et al., Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Decision Date: 1974-10-02
Citations: 170 U.S. App. D.C. 444
Docket Number: Nos. 73-1270, 73-1393
Parties: Stephen PETE on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, et al., Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA WELFARE AND RETIREMENT FUND OF 1950 et al., Appellants. Slimp KISER, on behalf of himself and all other similarly situated plaintiffs, et al. v. UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA WELFARE AND RETIREMENT FUND OF 1950, et al., Appellants.
Judges: Before BAZELON, Chief Judge, and WRIGHT, McGOWAN, TAMM, LEVEN-THAL, ROBINSON, MacKINNON, ROBB and WILKEY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Volume: 170
Pages: 444–444

Head Matter:
517 F.2d 1274
Stephen PETE on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, et al., Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA WELFARE AND RETIREMENT FUND OF 1950 et al., Appellants. Slimp KISER, on behalf of himself and all other similarly situated plaintiffs, et al. v. UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA WELFARE AND RETIREMENT FUND OF 1950, et al., Appellants.
Nos. 73-1270, 73-1393.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Oct. 2, 1974.
Before BAZELON, Chief Judge, and WRIGHT, McGOWAN, TAMM, LEVEN-THAL, ROBINSON, MacKINNON, ROBB and WILKEY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
On consideration of the "Petition for Rehearing En Banc" and the "Petition for Rehearing and/or Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc", it is
Ordered by the Court en banc that the above entitled cases shall be reheard by the Court sitting en banc at 2:00 P.M. Wednesday, October 23, 1974.