Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff- Appellee, v. Hiawatho ODOM, Jr., a/k/a Hiawatha Bines, Jr., a/k/a Peanut Odom, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-08-27
Citations: 341 F. App'x 906
Docket Number: No. 09-6792
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff— Appellee, v. Hiawatho ODOM, Jr., a/k/a Hiawatha Bines, Jr., a/k/a Peanut Odom, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 341
Pages: 906–906

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff— Appellee, v. Hiawatho ODOM, Jr., a/k/a Hiawatha Bines, Jr., a/k/a Peanut Odom, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 09-6792.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 20, 2009.
Decided: Aug. 27, 2009.
Hiawatho Odom, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Hiawatho Odom, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a reduction in sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Odom, No. 5:99-cr-00070-RLV-1 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 17, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.