Case Name: Jack Phillip CATLETT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-10-16
Citations: 567 So. 2d 1069
Docket Number: No. 89-1391
Parties: Jack Phillip CATLETT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 567
Pages: 1069–1069

Head Matter:
Jack Phillip CATLETT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 89-1391.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 16, 1990.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Elliot H. Scherker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Monique T. Befeler, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the conviction for armed robbery. The prosecutor's comments during closing argument were made in response to the theory of defense and to defense counsel's statements during both opening and closing arguments. Error, if any occurred, was both invited and harmless. See State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).
However, we vacate the defendant's conviction for possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony. State v. Smith, 547 So.2d 613 (Fla.1989); Carawan v. State, 515 So.2d 161 (Fla.1987).
Affirmed in part; vacated in part; remanded for correction of the record.