Case Name: ETTA LEONHAUSER, PLAINTIFF, v. ANNA W. HALL, DEFENDANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1924-05-26
Citations: 2 N.J. Misc. 429
Docket Number: 
Parties: ETTA LEONHAUSER, PLAINTIFF, v. ANNA W. HALL, DEFENDANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 2
Pages: 429–430

Head Matter:
ETTA LEONHAUSER, PLAINTIFF, v. ANNA W. HALL, DEFENDANT.
Submitted February term, 1924
Decided May 26, 1924.
Ejectment — Motion to Open Judgment — Legal Defense Not Shown.
On rule.
Before Gummeee, Chief Justice, and Justices Mintuen and Black.
For the plaintiff, George W. V. Moy.
For the defendant, Harvey Rolhberg.

Opinion:
Pee Cueiam.
This is a rule to show caiise, dated October 7th, 1921, why a judgment in ejectment in favor of the plaintiff, entered on December 8tli, 1921, should not be opened and the defendant permitted to file an answer. Under the rule testimony was taken. From that testimony our conclusion is that the defendant has failed to show a legal defense to the' action. The rule, therefore, is discharged, and the judgment entered December 8th, 1921, is allowed to stand.