Case Name: Lynn RAY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-03-18
Citations: 100 S.W.3d 148
Docket Number: No. ED 81408
Parties: Lynn RAY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 100
Pages: 148–149

Head Matter:
Lynn RAY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent.
No. ED 81408.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
March 18, 2003.
Lynn Ray, Licking, pro se.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Joel A. Block, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for Respondent.
Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Lynn Ray appeals from a judgment denying without an evidentiary hearing his motion for post-conviction relief filed under Rule 24.035. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2002, unless otherwise indicated.