Case Name: Harold S. ACKERMAN v. C. Howard HOOK and W. W. Miller, Individually and Doing Business as a Copartnership Under the Name and Style of Hook & Miller, John A. McCance, R. O. Graffius and Hook & Ackerman, Inc.; Harold S. Ackerman and Hook & Ackerman, Inc., Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1953-02-06
Citations: 201 F.2d 890
Docket Number: No. 10860
Parties: Harold S. ACKERMAN v. C. Howard HOOK and W. W. Miller, Individually and Doing Business as a Copartnership Under the Name and Style of Hook & Miller, John A. McCance, R. O. Graffius and Hook & Ackerman, Inc.; Harold S. Ackerman and Hook & Ackerman, Inc., Appellants.
Judges: Before GOODRICH, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 201
Pages: 890–890

Head Matter:
Harold S. ACKERMAN v. C. Howard HOOK and W. W. Miller, Individually and Doing Business as a Copartnership Under the Name and Style of Hook & Miller, John A. McCance, R. O. Graffius and Hook & Ackerman, Inc.; Harold S. Ackerman and Hook & Ackerman, Inc., Appellants.
No. 10860.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued Jan. 22, 1953.
Decided Feb. 6, 1953.
Harry Price, New York City (Matthew Sidney Biron, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for Harold S. Ackerman and Hook & Ackerman.
William B. Jaspert, Pittsburgh, Pa., for :C. Howard Hook and W. W. Miller, ind. and d/b/a Hook & Miller, and for R. O. Graffius.
Before GOODRICH, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the district court in this case will be affirmed for the reasons set out by Judge Kirkpatrick in his opinion in that court, 109 F.Supp. 933.