Case Name: Norman GRADSKY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1973-09-05
Citations: 482 F.2d 1379
Docket Number: No. 73-2152
Parties: Norman GRADSKY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 482
Pages: 1379–1380

Head Matter:
Norman GRADSKY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 73-2152.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Sept. 5, 1973.
Norman Gradsky, pro se.
Robert W. Rust, U. S. Atty., William R. Northcutt, Asst. U. S. Atty., Miami, Fla., for respondent-appellee.
Before THORNBERRY, GOLDBERG and RONEY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
It is hereby ordered that this appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction since the judgment sought to be appealed is not final as to all of the appellant's claims. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291, 1292; Rule 54(b), F.R.Civ.P.; Graham v. Cole, 5th Cir. 1973, 483 F.2d 255; Jones v. Riggsby, 5th Cir. 1973, 475 F.2d 760; United States v. Crow et al., 5th Cir. 1973, 474 F.2d 200.
Dismissed.
. It is appropriate to dispose of this pro se case summarily, pursuant to this Court's local Rule 9(e)(2), appellant having failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Kimbrough v. Beto, Director, 5th Cir. 1969, 412 F.2d 981.