Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Luis RODRIGUEZ MARTINEZ, also known as Jose Luis Rodriguez, also known as Jose Luis Rodriguez-Martinez, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-10-26
Citations: 399 F. App'x 919
Docket Number: No. 09-20779
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Luis RODRIGUEZ MARTINEZ, also known as Jose Luis Rodriguez, also known as Jose Luis Rodriguez-Martinez, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before SMITH, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 399
Pages: 919–920

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Luis RODRIGUEZ MARTINEZ, also known as Jose Luis Rodriguez, also known as Jose Luis Rodriguez-Martinez, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-20779
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Oct. 26, 2010.
James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Gerardo S. Montalvo, The Montalvo Law Firm, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before SMITH, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Jose Luis Rodriguez Martinez (Rodriguez) appeals the sentence imposed following his conviction for illegal reentry after deportation under 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Rodriguez contends that the district court erred by imposing a 16-level crime of violence enhancement based on his prior Texas conviction for sexual assault of a child, which is a violation of Texas Penal Code § 22.011(a)(2). He argues that this conviction does not constitute the enumerated offense of sexual abuse of a minor or statutory rape under the Guidelines because an offense under § 22.011 can be committed against a victim who is only 16 years of age. Rodriguez concedes that his argument is foreclosed and moves for summary affirmance to preserve the issue for appeal.
As Rodriguez concedes, his argument is foreclosed by United States v. Castro-Guevarra, 575 F.3d 550 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 649, 175 L.Ed.2d 496 (2009). Accordingly, his motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.