Case Name: Daniel BRADSHAW, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Nancy A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-11-28
Citations: 704 F. App'x 266
Docket Number: No. 17-1612
Parties: Daniel BRADSHAW, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Nancy A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before MOTZ, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 704
Pages: 266–267

Head Matter:
Daniel BRADSHAW, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Nancy A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 17-1612
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: October 30, 2017
Decided: November 28, 2017
Bruce K. Billman, Fredericksburg, Virginia, for Appellant. Nora Koch, Regional Chief Counsel, Stephen Giacchino, Supervisory Attorney, Jordana Cooper, Assistant Regional Counsel, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Dana J. Boente, United States Attorney, R. Trent McCotter, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Daniel Bradshaw appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, granting the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment, and upholding the Commissioner's decision denying Bradshaw's application for disability insurance benefits. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bradshaw v. Berryhill, No. 1:16-cv-00969-LO-JFA, 2017 WL 958105 (E.D. Va. Mar. 9, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED