Case Name: Nancy MOZEE, Appellant, v. ST. LUKE'S EPISCOPAL-PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITALS and Division of Employment Security, Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2014-09-02
Citations: 439 S.W.3d 861
Docket Number: No. ED 100892
Parties: Nancy MOZEE, Appellant, v. ST. LUKE’S EPISCOPAL-PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITALS and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.
Judges: Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 439
Pages: 861–862

Head Matter:
Nancy MOZEE, Appellant, v. ST. LUKE’S EPISCOPAL-PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITALS and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.
No. ED 100892.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Sept. 2, 2014.
Nancy Mozee (pro se), St. Charles, MO, for appellant.
St. Luke’s Hospital (pro se), Chesterfield, MO, Sara H. Harrison (Div. of Employment Security), Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Nancy Mozee (Claimant) appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying her unemployment benefits based upon its finding that St. Luke's Episcopal-Presbyterian Hospitals (Employer) terminated Claimant for misconduct connected with her work.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error in any of the respects alleged. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).