Case Name: Mufid AL-DIN, also known as Charles A. Parker, Appellee, v. Michael BOWERSOX, et al., Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1999-04-13
Citations: 176 F.3d 1043
Docket Number: No. 97-3598
Parties: Mufid AL-DIN, also known as Charles A. Parker, Appellee, v. Michael BOWERSOX, et al., Appellants.
Judges: Before: BOWMAN, Chief Judge, and McMILLIAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, FAGG, WOLLMAN, BEAM, LOKEN, HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, MURPHY and KELLY, Circuit Judges, En Banc.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 176
Pages: 1043–1043

Head Matter:
Mufid AL-DIN, also known as Charles A. Parker, Appellee, v. Michael BOWERSOX, et al., Appellants.
No. 97-3598.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 23, 1998.
Filed April 13, 1999.
Cassandra K. Dolgin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, argued (Frank A. Jung, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, on the brief), for Appellants.
Daniel L. Ringwald, Arnold, MO, argued, for Appellee.
Before: BOWMAN, Chief Judge, and McMILLIAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, FAGG, WOLLMAN, BEAM, LOKEN, HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, MURPHY and KELLY, Circuit Judges, En Banc.
. The Honorable John D. Kelly passed away on October 21, 1998. This opinion is consistent with his vote at the en banc conference following oral argument on September 23, 1998.

Opinion:
McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge.
Respondent Michael Bowersox appeals from an order entered in the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri denying his motion to dismiss Mufid A-Din's petition for writ of habeas corpus as untimely filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). Parker v. Bowersox, 975 F.Supp. 1251 (W.D.Mo.1997) (order denying respondent's motion to dismiss and granting respondent's motion for an interlocutory appeal). Jurisdiction in the district court was based upon 28 U.S.C. § 1331, 2254. Jurisdiction in this court is based upon 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). In an earlier proceeding, a divided panel of this court affirmed. We subsequently vacated the panel opinion and granted respondent's suggestion for rehearing en banc. Now, in accordance with our en banc opinion filed on this date in the consolidated cases under the title Nichols v. Bowersox, 172 F.3d 1068 (8th Cir.1999) (en banc), we affirm the order of the district court denying respondent's motion to dismiss. See 8th Cir.R. 47B.
. The Honorable Howard F. Sachs, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.