Case Name: PENICK & FORD, Limited, Incorporated, and Cresson-Morris Company, Defendants-Appellants, v. S. S. HEPWORTH COMPANY and Edith M. Horstman, Plaintiffs-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1931-01-23
Citations: 45 F.2d 1017
Docket Number: No. 4387
Parties: PENICK & FORD, Limited, Incorporated, and Cresson-Morris Company, Defendants-Appellants, v. S. S. HEPWORTH COMPANY and Edith M. Horstman, Plaintiffs-Appellees.
Judges: Before BUFFINGTON and WOOLLEY, Circuit Judges, and THOMPSON, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 45
Pages: 1017–1017

Head Matter:
PENICK & FORD, Limited, Incorporated, and Cresson-Morris Company, Defendants-Appellants, v. S. S. HEPWORTH COMPANY and Edith M. Horstman, Plaintiffs-Appellees.
No. 4387.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Jan. 23, 1931.
Joshua R. H. Potts, of Chicago, 111. (T. Bertram Humphries, of Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel), for appellants.
Hubert Ilowson and Howson & llowson, all of New York City, for appellees.
Before BUFFINGTON and WOOLLEY, Circuit Judges, and THOMPSON, District Judge.

Opinion:
BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.
This ease has had our careful consideration. We are satisfied it was correctly decided by the court below. 37 F.(2d) 732. The thoroughness of the discussion of the salient points in the case by the trial judge is so full that we shall not attempt to put in other language what he has already so well said.
The case is affirmed on his opinion.