Case Name: Otis BROWN, Jr., a/k/a Otis Lamar Brown, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1988-11-22
Citations: 533 So. 2d 933
Docket Number: No. 87-2540
Parties: Otis BROWN, Jr., a/k/a Otis Lamar Brown, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 533
Pages: 934–934

Head Matter:
Otis BROWN, Jr., a/k/a Otis Lamar Brown, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 87-2540.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 22, 1988.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Bruce A. Rosenthal, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Julie S. Thornton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The defendant contends, the State concedes, and we agree, that findings set forth in Paragraphs 2 and 5 of the Order of Revocation of Probation must be stricken from the Order because the trial court made no such findings at the conclusion of the revocation hearing, and no evidence was adduced to support such findings. See Higgs v. State, 470 So.2d 75 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Robinson v. State, 468 So.2d 1106 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Delgado v. State, 423 So.2d 603 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).
Remanded with directions to amend the Order of Revocation of Probation by striking Paragraphs 2 and 5 of the findings.