Case Name: TRIALGRAPHIX, INC., Petitioner, v. DACRA DESIGNMIAMI, LTD., Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-04-10
Citations: 813 So. 2d 253
Docket Number: No. 3D02-959
Parties: TRIALGRAPHIX, INC., Petitioner, v. DACRA DESIGNMIAMI, LTD., Respondent.
Judges: Before COPE, LEVY and RAMIREZ, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 813
Pages: 253–253

Head Matter:
TRIALGRAPHIX, INC., Petitioner, v. DACRA DESIGNMIAMI, LTD., Respondent.
No. 3D02-959.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 10, 2002.
Isicoff, Ragatz & Koeingsberg, and Eric D. Isicoff, and Teresa Ragatz, Miami, for petitioner.
Richard & Richard, and Dennis Richard, Miami, for respondent.
Before COPE, LEVY and RAMIREZ, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Denied. See Panagakos v. Laufer, 779 So.2d 296, 297 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) ("Prohibition is an extraordinary writ that is extremely narrow in scope and operation. It exists to prevent 'an inferior tribunal from acting in excess of jurisdiction but not to prevent an erroneous exercise of jurisdiction.' "), quoting English v. McCrary, 348 So.2d 293, 297 (Fla.1977).