Case Name: Ex parte DE GRAZIER
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1933-03-22
Citations: 59 S.W.2d 139
Docket Number: No. 15940
Parties: Ex parte DE GRAZIER.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 59
Pages: 139–140

Head Matter:
Ex parte DE GRAZIER.
No. 15940.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
March 22, 1933.
Rehearing Denied April 26, 1933.
W. B. Harrell, of Dallas, for appellant.,
Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
HAWKINS, Judge.
A writ of habeas corpus was issued on the 15th day of June, 1931, directed to the sheriff of Dallas county commanding him to show by what authority he was restraining relator. We find in the transcript a judgment entered "as of the 25tb day of June, 1931," and which is as follows: "On this day came on to be heard the application for writ of habeas corpus in the above cause and the court, after hearing the said application and the answer thereto, and the evidence introduced and argument of counsel, is of the opinion that the said Joe T. DeGrazier should be remanded to the custody of John T. Carton, the duly ánd legally designated agent appointed and designated by the Governor of the State of Texas, in the executive warrant issued by' the Governor of the State of Texas, on June 23, 1931, and introduced in evidence in this cause, the evidence showing the said Joe T. DeGrazier to be a fugitive from justice from the State of Illinois, and the Governor of the State of Illinois having duly and legally requested the extradition of the said Joe T. DeGrazier from the State of Texas to the State of Illinois. It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the relator, Joe T. DeGrazier be and he is hereby remanded to the custody of John T. Carton, duly and legally appointed and designated agent of the State of Illinois to receive the said Joe T. DeGrazier, to be conveyed by the said John T. Carton to the State of Illinois and there dealt with according to law."
The judgment then recites that relator excepted thereto and gave notice of appeal to this court. The judgment bears fil'e mark of date March 6, 1933.
No statement of facts accompanies the record. There is nothing to show that the extradition order issued by the Governor of the state was irregular or unauthorized. In the absence of a showing to the contrary, the presumption is that the Governor acted properly in the premises, and that the trial court was justified in remanding relator. See Ex parte Haynes, 98 Tex. Cr. R. 609, 267 S. W. 490, and cases therein cited.
In justice to this court, it ought to be said that, while the action of the trial court was of date June 25, 1931, no record was filed in this court until March 9, 1933.
The judgment remanding relator is affirmed.