Case Name: KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION, CLE Commission, Petitioner, v. Jason Michael NEMES, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Kentucky
Jurisdiction: Kentucky
Decision Date: 2006-08-24
Citations: 198 S.W.3d 600
Docket Number: No. 2006-SC-000023-KB
Parties: KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION, CLE Commission, Petitioner, v. Jason Michael NEMES, Respondent.
Judges: All concur. LAMBERT, C.J., not sitting.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 198
Pages: 600–602

Head Matter:
KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION, CLE Commission, Petitioner, v. Jason Michael NEMES, Respondent.
No. 2006-SC-000023-KB.
Supreme Court of Kentucky.
Aug. 24, 2006.

Opinion:
OPINION AND ORDER
SCOTT, Deputy Chief Justice.
On January 9, 2006, this Court issued an Order requiring Jason Michael Nemes, KBA Number 90546, whose last known bar roster address is 2227 Wadsworth Avenue, Louisville, Kentucky, 40205, to show cause why he should not be suspended from the practice of law for failure to comply with the New Lawyer Skills Program requirements as set forth in SCR 3.652(9).
SCR 3.652(9) provides that suspension from the practice of law is warranted for failure to complete and certify attendance for the New Lawyer Skills Program pursuant to paragraphs (5) and (6). Id. It allows for lesser sanctions where appropriate.
SCR 3.652(5) requires Kentucky State Bar Association members to complete the New Lawyer Skills Program within twelve (12) months following the date of their admission.
On October 25, 2005, the last program available before the expiration of the twelve-month period following the date of Nemes' admission, was held in Covington, Kentucky. Nemes registered for and attended the first day of the program. On the second day, however, he appeared late from lunch break by about thirty minutes. Jan Clark, Director for Continuing Legal Education for the Kentucky Bar Association, explained that there was a twenty minute grace period, that Nemes had failed to show during the grace period, and thus, he would be required to make up the missed thirty minutes at the next program. She also explained that since he failed to complete the entire program within the one year time period, he would be reported to the Kentucky Bar Association as non-compliant with the above referenced requirement.
Nemes responds that he was asked to attend a luncheon that day by his employer, the Chief Justice of the Kentucky Supreme Court, and that he did not anticipate that the luncheon would run as late as it did. Nemes explains that his employer asked that he stay for the entire luncheon and for a short meeting afterwards. Nemes acknowledges and apologizes for his tardiness and requests that he be permitted to make up the missed time at the next regularly scheduled program.
In reply, the CLE Commission moves the Court to find that Nemes has not shown cause why he should not be suspended from the practice of law or otherwise sanctioned pursuant to SCR 8.652(9). In lieu of suspension, the CLE Commission requests the Court to order Nemes to make up the portion of the program he missed at the New Lawyers Skills Program, scheduled for April 19-20, 2006, in Louisville; fíne Nemes $500 for his failure to attend; and order that he will be ineligible and shall not apply for a non-hardship time extension pursuant to SCR 3.667(2) for the education years ending June 30, 2006, and June 30, 2007.
Even though Nemes' tardiness was the direct result of obeying the functional equivalent of an order related to official business of the Court of Justice, the rules require that he must be sanctioned. Because we find his infraction to be de mini-mus and the circumstances to be extenuating, we impose the minimum penalty in accordance with our schedule.
It is therefore ORDERED:
1. Nemes shall pay a fine of $300.00 for non-compliance with the CLE requirements of SCR 3.652(5) for last year, to be paid to the Kentucky Bar Association within thirty (30) days of the date of this order, for which execution may issue upon expiration of said thirty (30) days;
2. If he has not already done so, he shall remedy his deficiency at the first available opportunity by attending that portion of the New Lawyers Skills Program that he missed in October 2005; and
3. He shall not apply for nor shall he be eligible for a non-hardship extension of time pursuant to SCR 3.667(2) for the educational years June 30, 2006, and June 30, 2007.
All concur. LAMBERT, C.J., not sitting.
SCOTT, J., concurs in a separate opinion in which GRAVES, McANULTY, MINTON, and ROACH, J.J., join.