Case Name: GENERAL G.M.C. SALES, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ROGER S. PASSARELLA, CLARE PASSARELLA, AND RUSSELL PASSARELLA, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1985-10-23
Citations: 101 N.J. 12
Docket Number: 
Parties: GENERAL G.M.C. SALES, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ROGER S. PASSARELLA, CLARE PASSARELLA, AND RUSSELL PASSARELLA, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 101
Pages: 12–12

Head Matter:
GENERAL G.M.C. SALES, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ROGER S. PASSARELLA, CLARE PASSARELLA, AND RUSSELL PASSARELLA, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Argued October 7, 1985
Decided October 23, 1985.
Robert A. Goodsell argued the cause for appellants {Irwin, Post & Rosen, attorneys).
Andrew J. Wilson argued the cause for respondent {Laird & Wilson, attorneys).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Without implying any view in respect of the applicability of today's decision to residential property, we affirm the judgment of the Appellate Division substantially for the reasons set forth in Judge Botter's opinion at 195 N.J.Super. 614 (1984).
For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 7.
For reversal —None.