Case Name: Isiah BELLINGER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1987-09-29
Citations: 513 So. 2d 732
Docket Number: Case No. 86-265
Parties: Isiah BELLINGER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before HUBBART, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 513
Pages: 732–732

Head Matter:
Isiah BELLINGER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Case No. 86-265.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Sept. 29, 1987.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Gitlitz, Keegan & Dittmar and James D. Keegan, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Julie S. Thornton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before HUBBART, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Mulvey v. State, 41 So.2d 156 (Fla.1949); Myers v. State, 499 So.2d 895 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). This case presents the same question certified in Condiles v. State, 512 So.2d 331 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987):
IS USE OF THE HABITUAL OFFENDER STATUTE TO EXCEED THE STATUTORILY PRESCRIBED MAXIMUM SENTENCE FOR THE OFFENSE PRECLUDED WHERE THE SENTENCE IMPOSED DOES NOT EXCEED THE RECOMMENDED GUIDELINE SENTENCE?
Question certified.