Case Name: CLEARBROOK HOUSTON LP, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. ADRIAN N. BAKER AND CO., et al., Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-06-20
Citations: 193 S.W.3d 836
Docket Number: No. ED 86483
Parties: CLEARBROOK HOUSTON LP, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. ADRIAN N. BAKER AND CO., et al., Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY and BOOKER T. SHAW, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 193
Pages: 836–836

Head Matter:
CLEARBROOK HOUSTON LP, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. ADRIAN N. BAKER AND CO., et al., Defendant/Respondent.
No. ED 86483.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
June 20, 2006.
Steven M. Hamburg, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Ryan J. Gavin, Mandy J. Hobson, St. Louis, MO, for respondents.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY and BOOKER T. SHAW, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The plaintiff, Clearbrook Houston L.P., claims instructional error and appeals entry of judgment by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County in favor of the defendants, Adrian N. Baker & Company and Steven Gissy. Finding no error, we affirm.
An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.
The trial court's judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(5).