Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Terreal KIRK, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2009-04-21
Citations: 280 S.W.3d 791
Docket Number: No. ED 91323
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Terreal KIRK, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 280
Pages: 791–792

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Terreal KIRK, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 91323.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
April 21, 2009.
Christopher A. Koster, Shaun J. MacK-elprang, Jefferson City, MO, for Plaintiff/Respondent.
Edward Scott Thompson, Saint Louis, MO, for Defendant/Appellant.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Terreal Kirk appeals from the judgment of the trial court finding him guilty of burglary and arson. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court's admission of evidence of phone messages left by Appellant for the victim of his crimes was not an abuse of discretion. State v. Hutchison, 957 S.W.2d 757, 763 (Mo.banc 1997). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).