Case Name: ALBERT T. DAISLEY, Administrator, v. S. E. HAMBELTON et al.
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1929-12-17
Citations: 131 Or. 507
Docket Number: 
Parties: ALBERT T. DAISLEY, Administrator, v. S. E. HAMBELTON et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 131
Pages: 507–508

Head Matter:
Argued at Pendleton, October 29;
affirmed December 17, 1929;
rehearing denied January 7, 1930
ALBERT T. DAISLEY, Administrator, v. S. E. HAMBELTON et al.
(282 Pac. 1086)
For appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Mr. George W. Cherry.
For respondent there was a brief and oral argument by Mr. J. A. Burleigh.

Opinion:
ROSSMAN, J.
We believe that the opening paragraph of the decision in Malagamba, v. McLean, 89 Or. 807 (173 P. 1175), is sufficient to determine this suit adversely to the plaintiff; we quote:
"This suit is based upon the theory that the real property of an estate is not subject to execution upon a judgment against the heir, until after final distribution of the estate; but such a conclusion is clearly erroneous."
If any further authorities are required to warrant an affirmance of the result below the following ought to suffice: Freeman on Executions (3ded.), §183; 17 R. C. L., Levy and Seizure, § 64, p. 164; 18 C. J., Descent and Distribution, § 333; 23 C. J., Executions, § 66. The decree of the lower court is affirmed.
Affirmed. Rehearing Denied.