Case Name: Littlefield v. The State
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1918-11-01
Citations: 22 Ga. App. 783
Docket Number: 9792
Parties: Littlefield v. The State.
Judges: Broyles, P. J., and Bloodmorth, J., concur.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 22
Pages: 783–783

Head Matter:
9792.
Littlefield v. The State.
Decided November 1, 1918.
Indictment for sale of intoxicating liquor; from Whitfield superior court—Judge Tarver. April 10, 1918.
W. E. Mann, Glenn & House, for plaintiff in error.
J. M. Lang, solicitor-general, contra.

Opinion:
Harwell, J.
1. The defendant's motion for a continuance on account of absent witnesses failing to conform to the statutory requirements (Penal Code (1910), § 987; Civil Code, § 5715), the court did not err in overruling the motion.
2. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial. See, in this connection, Littlefield v. State (case No. 9793), ante, 782.
Judgment affirmed.
Broyles, P. J., and Bloodmorth, J., concur.