Case Name: Mario Jimenez RIOS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE; Jonathon Dobre, Warden, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-01-28
Citations: 324 F.3d 296
Docket Number: No. 02-40766
Parties: Mario Jimenez RIOS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE; Jonathon Dobre, Warden, Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 324
Pages: 296–297

Head Matter:
Mario Jimenez RIOS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE; Jonathon Dobre, Warden, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 02-40766
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Jan. 28, 2003.
Mario Jimenez Rios, Beaumont, TX, pro se.
Emily Anne Radford, Asst. Director, David Michael McConnell, U.S. Dept, of Justice, Civ. Div. Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for I.N.S.
Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Mario Jimenez Rios, an excludable alien who arrived in the United States in the 1980 Mariel boatlift from Cuba, appeals the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition, in which he challenges his continued detention by the Immigration and Naturalization Service ("INS"). INS took Rios into custody in 1998 following his state conviction and sentence for attempted indecency with a child, the latest conviction in his extensive criminal history within the United States. The record shows that he has received parole review but has been repeatedly denied release on account of his criminal history and disciplinary record.
Relying on Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 121 S.Ct. 2491, 150 L.Ed.2d 653 (2001), Rios contends that his continued detention violates his constitutional rights. The district court did not err in determining that Rios is not entitled to relief. See Gisbert v. U.S. Atty. Gen., 988 F.2d 1437, 1439 (5th Cir.1993), amended by Gisbert v. U.S. Atty. Gen., 997 F.2d 1122 (5th Cir. 1993). Although Zadvydas held that a deportable alien may contest his continued detention in a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 proceeding, the Court distinguished the status of deportable aliens from that of excludable aliens like Rios. See Zadvydas, 533 U.S. at 682, 692-94, 121 S.Ct. 2491. Rios's petition is governed by Gisbert.
AFFIRMED.