Case Name: STATE ex rel. Patrick James DIXON v. JUDGES, THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF UNION, CITY OF RUSTON
Court: Louisiana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1990-10-05
Citations: 567 So. 2d 88
Docket Number: No. 90-KH-2052
Parties: STATE ex rel. Patrick James DIXON v. JUDGES, THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF UNION, CITY OF RUSTON.
Judges: 
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 567
Pages: 88–88

Head Matter:
STATE ex rel. Patrick James DIXON v. JUDGES, THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF UNION, CITY OF RUSTON.
No. 90-KH-2052.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Oct. 5, 1990.

Opinion:
In re Dixon, Patrick James; —Plaintiffs); • applying for writ of mandamus, supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Union, 3rd Judicial District Court, Div. "A", No. 1345.
The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for expungment of arrest record he claims to have filed on or about May 25, 1990. If relator's representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.