Case Name: Cecilia Teodorescu, Appellant, v. Resnick & Binder, P.C., Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2010-03-25
Citations: 14 N.Y.3d 776
Docket Number: 
Parties: Cecilia Teodorescu, Appellant, v Resnick & Binder, P.C., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 14
Pages: 776–777

Head Matter:
[925 NE2d 581, 898 NYS2d 543]
Cecilia Teodorescu, Appellant, v Resnick & Binder, P.C., Respondent.
Argued February 11, 2010;
decided March 25, 2010
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Lawrence B. Lame, Jamaica, and Jonah Grossman for appellant.
Kelleher & Maragno, LLP, Albany (John J. Kelleher of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order reversed, with costs, and defendant's motion for summary judgment denied. We hold, contrary to the Appellate Division, that plaintiff raised issues of fact regarding whether she could have prevailed on a theory of constructive notice.
Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.