Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bobby CRESPIN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-10-01
Citations: 249 F. App'x 588
Docket Number: No. 07-10096
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Bobby CRESPIN, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 249
Pages: 588–589

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Bobby CRESPIN, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 07-10096.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 24, 2007 .
Filed Oct. 1, 2007.
Kimberly A. Sanchez, Fresno, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Robert W. Rainwater, Esq., FPDCA— Federal Public Defender’s Office, Fresno, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Bobby Crespin appeals from the district court's order denying his motion to suppress evidence. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Crespin contends that the district court erred by finding that law enforcement did not exceed the scope of a search warrant authorizing the search of a "single family dwelling." We are not persuaded, and we conclude that the district court properly denied the suppression motion. See United States v. Ayers, 924 F.2d 1468, 1480 (9th Cir.1991); cf. Mena v. City of Simi Valley, 226 F.3d 1031, 1038 (9th Cir.2000).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.