Case Name: Robert Dale PUCKETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rick L. BOLLAR; et al., Defendants- Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-07-21
Citations: 189 F. App'x 680
Docket Number: No. 05-36220
Parties: Robert Dale PUCKETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rick L. BOLLAR; et al., Defendants— Appellees.
Judges: Before: B. FLETCHER, HAWKINS and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 189
Pages: 680–681

Head Matter:
Robert Dale PUCKETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rick L. BOLLAR; et al., Defendants— Appellees.
No. 05-36220.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
July 17, 2006.
Filed July 21, 2006.
Robert Dale Puckett, Rupert, ID, pro se.
Roger Lee Gabel, Esq., AGID — Office of the Idaho Attorney General, Martin C. Hendrickson, Esq., Moore & Baskin, LLP, Boise, ID, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: B. FLETCHER, HAWKINS and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM *
A review of the record and response to the order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.
All pending motions are denied as moot.
AFFIRMED.