Case Name: Seymour Ginsberg et al., Appellants, v. Industrial Home for the Blind et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1986-11-24
Citations: 124 A.D.2d 781
Docket Number: 
Parties: Seymour Ginsberg et al., Appellants, v Industrial Home for the Blind et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 124
Pages: 781–781

Head Matter:
Seymour Ginsberg et al., Appellants, v Industrial Home for the Blind et al., Respondents.

Opinion:
The undisputed facts presented to the court on the defendants' motion for summary judgment establish, as a matter of law, that the transportation-related injury to the plaintiff Seymour Ginsberg arose out of, and in the course of his employment with the defendant Industrial Home for the Blind (see, Matter of Holcomb v Daily News, 45 NY2d 602). Accordingly, Special Term was correct in granting the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiffs' exclusive remedy lies under the Workers' Compensation Law (see, Workers' Compensation Law § 11). Mangano, J. P., Weinstein, Lawrence and Fiber, JJ., concur.