Case Name: In the Matter of Rusciano & Son Corporation et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. William E. Roche, as Assessor, et al., Respondents-Appellants; In the Matter of Rusciano & Son Corporation et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. Richard R. Blessing, as Assessor, et al., Respondents-Appellants
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1981-11-23
Citations: 55 N.Y.2d 701
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Rusciano & Son Corporation et al., Appellants-Respondents, v William E. Roche, as Assessor, et al., Respondents-Appellants. In the Matter of Rusciano & Son Corporation et al., Appellants-Respondents, v Richard R. Blessing, as Assessor, et al., Respondents-Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 55
Pages: 701–702

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Rusciano & Son Corporation et al., Appellants-Respondents, v William E. Roche, as Assessor, et al., Respondents-Appellants. In the Matter of Rusciano & Son Corporation et al., Appellants-Respondents, v Richard R. Blessing, as Assessor, et al., Respondents-Appellants.
Submitted October 26, 1981;
decided November 23, 1981

Opinion:
Motions by respondents-appellants for leave to appeal denied. On the court's own motion, appeal taken as of right by petitioners-appellants-respondents dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the Appellate Division order (70 AD2d 953) granting a new trial, here brought up for review, did not "necessarily affect" the final order, as required by CPLR 5601 (subd [d]). (Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, § 79, pp 344-345.)