Case Name: Vincent John HALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Duron BURNEY, Officer; Town of Maxton; Tammy Deese; Gladys Dean, Defendants-Appellees, and Maxton Police Department, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-03-26
Citations: 561 F. App'x 293
Docket Number: No. 13-2084
Parties: Vincent John HALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Duron BURNEY, Officer; Town of Maxton; Tammy Deese; Gladys Dean, Defendants-Appellees, and Maxton Police Department, Defendant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 561
Pages: 293–294

Head Matter:
Vincent John HALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Duron BURNEY, Officer; Town of Maxton; Tammy Deese; Gladys Dean, Defendants-Appellees, and Maxton Police Department, Defendant.
No. 13-2084.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 27, 2014.
Decided: March 26, 2014.
Vincent John Hall, Appellant pro se. Ronnie Monroe Mitchell, Mitchell Law Group, Fayetteville, North Carolina, Andrew James Santaniello, Clawson & Staubes, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Vincent John Hall appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Hall's motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hall v. Burney, No. 7:10-cv-00184-BO, 2013 WL 4828570 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 10, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.