Case Name: Katie D. TUCKER, Petitioner, v. Donald George RESHA, Jr., Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-02-28
Citations: 670 So. 2d 111
Docket Number: No. 92-1744
Parties: Katie D. TUCKER, Petitioner, v. Donald George RESHA, Jr., Respondent.
Judges: MINER, MICKLE and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 670
Pages: 111–111

Head Matter:
Katie D. TUCKER, Petitioner, v. Donald George RESHA, Jr., Respondent.
No. 92-1744.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Feb. 28, 1996.
Rehearing Denied April 10, 1996.
Brian S. Duffy & Mary L. Wakeman, of MeConnaughhay, Roland, Maida & Cherr, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Richard E. Johnson, of Spriggs & Johnson; William A. Friedlander, Tallahassee, for Ap-pellee.

Opinion:
ORDER ON REMAND
PER CURIAM.
In accordance with the controlling opinion issued by the Supreme Court of Florida in Tucker v. Resha, 648 So.2d 1187 (Fla.1994), which set out the proper standard for reviewing the order entered by the trial court, we deny the petition. Id. at 1190 (holding that "an order denying summary judgment based upon a claim of qualified immunity is subject to interlocutory review to the extent that the order turns on an issue of law"). See also Johnson v. Jones, — U.S. -, -, 115 S.Ct. 2151, 2156, 132 L.Ed.2d 238 (1995); Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, 530, 105 S.Ct. 2806, 2817, 86 L.Ed.2d 411 (1985) (denial of qualified immunity, to the extent it turns on an issue of law, is an appealable final decision).
PETITION DENIED.
MINER, MICKLE and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.