Case Name: Cunningham v. McCluskey et al.; Coulter v. United States District Court for the District of South Carolina; Adkins v. Armstrong et al.; Rodriguez v. Peters, Director, Oregon Department of Corrections, et al.; Neng Por Yang v. City of Shakopee, Minnesota, et al.; Neng Por Yang v. Hanson et al.; Bak v. Donahoe, Postmaster General, et al.; Selgas et ux. v. Henderson County Appraisal District; Dang v. Solar Turbines Inc.; Vickerman v. Bixler et al.; Abram v. Gerry, Warden; Evans v. United States
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-11-13
Citations: 568 U.S. 1020
Docket Number: No. 11-1328; No. 11-10174; No. 11-10244; No. 11-10451; No. 11-10776; No. 11-10788; No. 11-10910; No. 12-39; No. 12-5239; No. 12-5322; No. 12-5482; No. 12-5517
Parties: Cunningham v. McCluskey et al., Coulter v. United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, Adkins v. Armstrong et al., Rodriguez v. Peters, Director, Oregon Department of Corrections, et al., Neng Por Yang v. City of Shakopee, Minnesota, et al., Neng Por Yang v. Hanson et al., Bak v. Donahoe, Postmaster General, et al., Selgas et ux. v. Henderson County Appraisal District, Dang v. Solar Turbines Inc., Vickerman v. Bixler et al., Abram v. Gerry, Warden, Evans v. United States,
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 568
Pages: 1020–1020

Head Matter:
No. 11-1328.
No. 11-10174.
No. 11-10244.
No. 11-10451.
No. 11-10776.
No. 11-10788.
No. 11-10910.
No. 12-39.
No. 12-5239.
No. 12-5322.
No. 12-5482.
No. 12-5517.
Cunningham v. McCluskey et al., Coulter v. United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, Adkins v. Armstrong et al., Rodriguez v. Peters, Director, Oregon Department of Corrections, et al., Neng Por Yang v. City of Shakopee, Minnesota, et al., Neng Por Yang v. Hanson et al., Bak v. Donahoe, Postmaster General, et al., Selgas et ux. v. Henderson County Appraisal District, Dang v. Solar Turbines Inc., Vickerman v. Bixler et al., Abram v. Gerry, Warden, Evans v. United States,

Opinion:
ante, p. 816;
ante, p. 835;
ante, p. 837;
ante, p. 844;
ante, p. 861;
ante, p. 862;
ante, p. 868;
ante, p. 884;
ante, p. 902;
ante, p. 907;
ante, p. 914; and
ante, p. 916. Petitions for rehearing denied.