Case Name: Lennart S. KOO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2015-01-27
Citations: 162 So. 3d 156
Docket Number: No. 1D12-4866
Parties: Lennart S. KOO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: WOLF, J., concurs; MAKAR, J., dissents with opinion.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 162
Pages: 156–158

Head Matter:
Lennart S. KOO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D12-4866.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jan. 27, 2015.
D. Gray Thomas of the Law Office of D. Gray Thomas, Jacksonville, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General; Wesley Cross Paxson and Jay Kubica, As sistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
ROBERTS, J.
The motion for rehearing and rehearing en banc filed September 17, 2014, is DENIED.
The opinion of the Court in this case and Judge Wolfs concurrence clearly point out that the victim's letter is not a recantation in any way, shape, or form. The letter does not contradict the victim's trial testimony, and it does not provide any information that would tend to rebut any of the elements of the convicted crime. It merely provides after-the-fact speculation concerning the Appellant's possible motive for committing the theft of the firearms. A post hoc rationalization does not require an evidentiary hearing where there is no part of it that could be viewed as a recantation. Therefore, our decision is consistent with any existing precedent.
WOLF, J., concurs; MAKAR, J., dissents with opinion.