Case Name: KEATING v. EDGAR, Auditor, etc.
Court: Supreme Court of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1884-03-29
Citations: 2 Cal. Unrep. 289
Docket Number: No. 9260
Parties: KEATING v. EDGAR, Auditor, etc.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Unreported Cases
Volume: 2
Pages: 289–293

Head Matter:
KEATING v. EDGAR, Auditor, etc.
No. 9260;
March 29, 1884.
3 Pac. 594.
Mandamus.—Findings Held to Support the judgment.
APPEAL from the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco.
The facts are stated in the dissenting opinion of Thornton, J.
William Craig for appellant; Scrivner & MeKinne, Talcott & Crockett and Robert Crockett for respondent.

Opinion:
By the COURT.
The only question presented by the record on this appeal is whether the findings support the judgment. We think they do
Judgment affirmed.
We dissent: McKinstry, J.; Ross, J.