Case Name: The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Lawrence CLARK, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1980-10-28
Citations: 389 So. 2d 1216
Docket Number: No. 79-1738
Parties: The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Lawrence CLARK, Appellee.
Judges: Before NESBITT, BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 389
Pages: 1216–1216

Head Matter:
The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Lawrence CLARK, Appellee.
No. 79-1738.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 28, 1980.
Rehearing Denied Nov. 24, 1980.
Janet Reno, State’s Atty. and Milton Robbins, Asst. State’s Atty., for appellant.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Joseph C. Segor, Asst. Public Defender, for appellee.
Before NESBITT, BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. An arrest for trespass under Section 810.08(1), Florida Statutes (1977), as for other cases, must be based on facts which lead a reasonable person to believe that an offense has been committed, Albo v. State, 379 So.2d 648 (Fla.1980); Benefield v. State, 160 So.2d 706 (Fla.1964), and not upon suspicion. Betancourt v. State, 224 So.2d 378 (Fla.3d DCA 1969).