Case Name: Ramiro Constantino TULA RUBIO, also known as Ramiro Tula, Petitioner v. Loretta LYNCH, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-10-28
Citations: 805 F.3d 185
Docket Number: No. 14-60183
Parties: Ramiro Constantino TULA RUBIO, also known as Ramiro Tula, Petitioner v. Loretta LYNCH, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before STEWART, Chief Judge, HAYNES, Circuit Judge, and BROWN, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 805
Pages: 185–192

Head Matter:
Ramiro Constantino TULA RUBIO, also known as Ramiro Tula, Petitioner v. Loretta LYNCH, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 14-60183.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Oct. 28, 2015.
Matthew Lorn Hoppock, Esq., Hoppock Law Firm, LLC, Overland Park, KS, for Petitioner.
Andrea Niki Gevas, Jeffrey Ronald Meyer, Esq., Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondents.
Before STEWART, Chief Judge, HAYNES, Circuit Judge, and BROWN, District Judge.
District Judge for the Eastern District of Louisiana, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
ORDER:
A member of the court in active service having requested a poll on the reconsideration of this cause en banc, and a majority of 'the judges in active service and not disqualified not having voted in favor (Fed. R. App. P. 35 and 5th Cir. R. 35), rehearing en bane is DENIED.
In the en banc poll, 5 judges voted in favor of rehearing (Judges Jones, Smith, Clement, Owen, and Elrod), and 10 judges voted against rehearing (Chief Judge Stewart and Judges Jolly, Davis, Dennis, Prado, Southwick, Haynes, Graves,. Hig-ginson, and Costa).