Case Name: In re: Samuel Dewitt McCOTTER, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-03-17
Citations: 89 F. App'x 429
Docket Number: No. 03-7669
Parties: In re: Samuel Dewitt McCOTTER, Petitioner.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 89
Pages: 429–429

Head Matter:
In re: Samuel Dewitt McCOTTER, Petitioner.
No. 03-7669.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 27, 2004.
Decided March 17, 2004.
Samuel DeWitt McCotter, Petitioner pro se.
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Samuel DeWitt McCotter petitions this court for a writ of mandamus to compel the district court to rule on his pending petition for a writ of error coram nobis. The granting of a writ of mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used in extraordinary circumstances. In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir.1987). McCotter's petition does not set forth exceptional circumstances as would warrant the issuance of a writ of mandamus at this time. We note, however, that no significant action has been taken in the district court for over nine months.
Accordingly, we deny McCotter's mandamus petition without prejudice to his refiling it should the district court fail to act within a reasonable time. We grant McCotter's application to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED