Case Name: Enrique CASTILLO, Appellant, v. Vitor WEINMAN, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-07-03
Citations: 675 So. 2d 1044
Docket Number: No. 95-3232
Parties: Enrique CASTILLO, Appellant, v. Vitor WEINMAN, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GODERICH and FLETCHER, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 675
Pages: 1044–1044

Head Matter:
Enrique CASTILLO, Appellant, v. Vitor WEINMAN, Appellee.
No. 95-3232.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 3, 1996.
A.J. Barranco & Associates, Sam Daniels and Robert F. Kohlman, Miami, for appellant.
Stickney & Sutter, Timothy P. Stickney and Howard T. Sutter, Key Biscayne; Stearns, Weaver, Miller, Weissler, Alhadeff & Sitterson, Eugene E. Stearns and Bradford Swing, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GODERICH and FLETCHER, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the order under review, but remand for clarification. Specifically, the trial court's order should clearly indicate that the seller is required to pursue the action to quiet title in good faith. The order should also indicate that if the seller does not prevail in the action to quiet title, the buyer then has the option of either receiving a return of his deposit or accepting title to the property subject to the easement.
Affirmed and remanded with directions.