Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lisa Van PATTEN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-10-02
Citations: 249 F. App'x 675
Docket Number: No. 07-50241
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lisa Van PATTEN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 249
Pages: 675–676

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lisa Van PATTEN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-50241.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 24, 2007 .
Filed Oct. 2, 2007.
Carlos Arguello, Esq., USSD — Office of the U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of California, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Gary P. Burcham, Esq., San Diego, CA, for D efend ant-App ellant.
Before: CANBY, TASHIMA and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Lisa Van Patten appeals from the sentence imposed following revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for plain error, United States v. Ortiz, 362 F.3d 1274, 1278 (9th Cir.2004), and we affirm.
Appellant contends that 18 U.S.C. § 3624(e) prohibits the district court from imposing a consecutive sentence of imprisonment where a defendant violates concurrent terms of supervised release. This contention is foreclosed by United States v. Jackson, 176 F.3d 1175, 1177-78 (9th Cir.1999) (per curiam).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.