Case Name: Blake McGRATH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sergeant SPENCER; Unknown Intake Sergeant # 1; Unknown Intake Sergeant #2; Mr. Slomon, Director of Polk Correctional Institution, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-04-25
Citations: 471 F. App'x 208
Docket Number: No. 11-7727
Parties: Blake McGRATH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sergeant SPENCER; Unknown Intake Sergeant # 1; Unknown Intake Sergeant #2; Mr. Slomon, Director of Polk Correctional Institution, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 471
Pages: 208–208

Head Matter:
Blake McGRATH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sergeant SPENCER; Unknown Intake Sergeant # 1; Unknown Intake Sergeant #2; Mr. Slomon, Director of Polk Correctional Institution, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 11-7727.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 19, 2012.
Decided: April 25, 2012.
Blake McGrath, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Blake McGrath appeals the district court's order dismissing as frivolous his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) suit against state prison officials for the loss of some of his books. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because McGrath's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, McGrath has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We deny McGrath's motions for transcript at government expense and to amend/correct complaint. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.