Case Name: IN the INTEREST OF M.S.H., a child Grand Forks County Social Services, Petitioner and Appellee v. M.S.H., a child, C.H., Sr., father, Respondents and F.R.O., mother, Respondent and Appellant In the Interest of C.H.H., a child Grand Forks County Social Services, Petitioner and Appellee v. C.H.H., Jr., a child, C.H., Sr., father, Respondents and F.R.O., mother, Respondent and Appellant In the Interest of A.R.G., a child Grand Forks County Social Services, Petitioner and Appellee v. A.R.G., a child, C.H., Sr., biological father, A.G., legal father Respondents and F.R.O., mother, Respondent and Appellant
Court: North Dakota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: North Dakota
Decision Date: 2018-08-01
Citations: 916 N.W.2d 112
Docket Number: No. 20180172; No. 20180173; No. 20180174
Parties: IN the INTEREST OF M.S.H., a child
Judges: 
Reporter: North Western Reporter 2d
Volume: 916
Pages: 112–113

Head Matter:
IN the INTEREST OF M.S.H., a child
Grand Forks County Social Services, Petitioner and Appellee
v.
M.S.H., a child, C.H., Sr., father, Respondents
and
F.R.O., mother, Respondent and Appellant
In the Interest of C.H.H., a child
Grand Forks County Social Services, Petitioner and Appellee
v.
C.H.H., Jr., a child, C.H., Sr., father, Respondents
and
F.R.O., mother, Respondent and Appellant
In the Interest of A.R.G., a child
Grand Forks County Social Services, Petitioner and Appellee
v.
A.R.G., a child, C.H., Sr., biological father, A.G., legal father Respondents
and
F.R.O., mother, Respondent and Appellant
No. 20180172
No. 20180173
No. 20180174
Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Filed August 1, 2018
Jacqueline A. Gaddie, Assistant State's Attorney, Grand Forks, ND, for petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief.
Darla J. Schuman, Grand Forks, ND, for respondent and appellant; submitted on brief.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
[¶1] F.R.O. appealed from a juvenile court order terminating her parental rights to M.S.H., C.H.H., and A.R.G. The juvenile court found the children are deprived, the conditions and causes of the deprivation are likely to continue, the children are suffering or will probably suffer serious harm in the future, and that reasonable efforts were made to keep the family together. On appeal, the mother argues there was not clear and convincing evidence to support a termination of her parental rights. We conclude the juvenile court's findings are supported by clear and convincing evidence and are not clearly erroneous. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Jerod E. Tufte
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Steven Marquart, D.J.
[¶3] The Honorable Steven L. Marquart, D. J., sitting in place of Jensen, J., disqualified.