Case Name: BUTTS et al. v. ROTHSCHILD BROS. HAT CO.
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1916-07-25
Citations: 60 Okla. 86
Docket Number: No. 7505
Parties: BUTTS et al. v. ROTHSCHILD BROS. HAT CO.
Judges: 
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 60
Pages: 86–86

Head Matter:
BUTTS et al. v. ROTHSCHILD BROS. HAT CO.
No. 7505
Opinion Filed July 25, 1916.
(159 Pac. 245.)
Appeal and Error — Liabilities on Bond— Judgment.
In a, case appealed to the Supreme Court where supersedeas bond has been given staying execution, and the judgment here is against the appellant, this court by virtue of the provisions of chapter 249’, Sess. Laws 1915, will enter judgment against the sureties on such bond.
(Syllabus by Bleakmore, C.)
Error from District Court, Coal County; R. M. Rainey, Judge.
Action between J. W. Butts, Jr., and another and the Rothschild Brothers Hat Company. From the judgment, Butts and another bring error. Motion for judgment against sureties on supersedeas bond.
Sustained.
George Trice, for plaintiffs in error.
Fooshee & Brunson, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
Opinion by
BLEAKMORE, C.
On appeal to this court from a judgment of the district court of Coal county, supersedeas bond was filed, executed by the plaintiffs in error as principals, and E. R. Bunch and R. A. Arnold as sureties, to stay said judgment. On July 11, 1916, there was judgment of this court against appellants ; and motion has been filed herein for judgment against the sureties on such supersedeas bond. By virtue of the provisions of chapter 249, Sess. Laws 1915, as construed in Long v. Lang & Co., 49 Okla. 342, 152 Pac. 1078, the motion is sustained.
Judgment is therefore entered in this court against E. R. Bunch and S. A. Arnold, in the sum of .$199.47. together with interest thereon at the rate of 6 per cent, per annum from the 29th day of September, 1914, and all costs of the action.
By the Court: It is so ordered.