Case Name: CITY OF SEDALIA ex rel. GILSONITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Respondent, v. C. W. ROBBINS et al., Appellants
Court: Kansas City Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1911-01-02
Citations: 152 Mo. App. 290
Docket Number: 
Parties: CITY OF SEDALIA ex rel. GILSONITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Respondent, v. C. W. ROBBINS et al., Appellants.
Judges: All concur.
Reporter: Missouri Appeal Reports
Volume: 152
Pages: 290–291

Head Matter:
CITY OF SEDALIA ex rel. GILSONITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Respondent, v. C. W. ROBBINS et al., Appellants.
Kansas City Court of Appeals,
January 2, 1911.
TAXB1LLS: Public Improvements. The only substantial question in controversy was determined adversely to appellants in the case of City “of Sedalia ex rel. v. Montgomery, Jr., et al. 227 Mo. 1, which was certified to the Supreme Court by the St. Louis Court of Appeals (109 Mo. App. 197).
Appeal from Pettis Circuit Court. — Hon. George F. Long an, Judge.
Affirmed.
Barnett & Barnett for appellants.
'Montgomery ds Montgomery for respondent.

Opinion:
JOHNSON, J.
This is an action to enforce the lien of a special taxbill. The appeal is from a judgment in favor of plaintiff. We have been holding the case under advisement awaiting the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of City of Sedalia ex rel. v. John Montgomery, Jr., et al., which was certified by the St. Louis Court of Appeals to the Supreme Court (109 Mo. App. 197). The Supreme Court adopted the opinion of the St. Louis Court of Appeals and'the rule declared in that opinion determines adversely to the appellant the only substantial question in controversy in the present case. Other grounds are urged against the validity of the taxbills but they are not tenable.
Following the decision of the Supreme Court, we affirm the judgment.
All concur.