Case Name: Christopher F. SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1981-05-06
Citations: 400 So. 2d 27
Docket Number: No. 80-1810
Parties: Christopher F. SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: HOBSON, Acting C. J., and GRIMES and RYDER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 400
Pages: 27–28

Head Matter:
Christopher F. SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 80-1810.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
May 6, 1981.
Rehearing Denied July 1, 1981.
Jerry Hill, Public Defender, and David A. Davis, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Michael A. Palecki, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We accept the reasoning of our sister court in Norman v. State, 388 So.2d 613 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) that the automatic standing rule has not become a part of this state's law in order to survive the overruling of Jones v. United States, 362 U.S. 257, 80 S.Ct. 725, 4 L.Ed.2d 697 (1960) by the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Salvucci, 448 U.S. 83, 100 S.Ct. 2547, 65 L.Ed.2d 619 (1980) and Rawlings v. Kentucky, 448 U.S. 98, 100 S.Ct. 2556, 65 L.Ed.2d 633 (1980). Therefore, we affirm.
HOBSON, Acting C. J., and GRIMES and RYDER, JJ., concur.