Case Name: JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Supap KIRTSAENG, D/B/A bluechristine99, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-08-04
Citations: 653 F. App'x 82
Docket Number: No. 14-344-cv
Parties: JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Supap KIRTSAENG, D/B/A bluechristine99, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Present: ROBERT A. KATZMANN, Chief Judge, JOHN M. WALKER, JR., DENNY CHIN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 653
Pages: 82–83

Head Matter:
JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Supap KIRTSAENG, D/B/A bluechristine99, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 14-344-cv
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
August 4, 2016
For Plaintiff-Appellee: Paul M. Smith, Jenner & Block LLP, Washington, D.C., Matthew J. Oppenheim, Oppenheim + Zebrak, LLP, Washington, D.C.
For Defendant-Appellee: AndRew D. SilveRMAn (E. Joshua Rosenkranz, Annette L. Hurst, Lisa T. Simpson, on the brief), Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, New York, New York
Present: ROBERT A. KATZMANN, Chief Judge, JOHN M. WALKER, JR., DENNY CHIN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
SUMMARY ORDER
After our decision in John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Kirtsaeng, 605 Fed.Appx. 48, 49 (2d Cir. 2015), affirming the district court's denial of attorney's fees to prevailing defendant Supap Kirtsaeng, Kirtsaeng petitioned the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. The Supreme Court granted the writ of certiorari, vacated the decision of this Court, and remanded the case. See Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 579 U.S.-, 136 S.Ct. 1979, 195 L.Ed.2d 368 (2016).
'We now VACATE the judgment of the district court and REMAND for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court.