Case Name: EDITH ROE, RESPONDENT, v. WALTER G. BONHAM, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1923-10-05
Citations: 102 N.J.L. 728
Docket Number: 
Parties: EDITH ROE, RESPONDENT, v. WALTER G. BONHAM, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 102
Pages: 728–729

Head Matter:
EDITH ROE, RESPONDENT, v. WALTER G. BONHAM, APPELLANT.
Submitted July 9, 1923
Decided October 5, 1923.
For the appellant, Rex A. Donnelly.
For the respondent, LeRoy W. Loder.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, White, Heppenhelmer, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.