Case Name: Clarence Mackay NEWCOMB, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1944-09-05
Citations: 144 F.2d 354
Docket Number: No. 10586
Parties: Clarence Mackay NEWCOMB, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
Judges: Before DENMAN and HEALY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 144
Pages: 354–355

Head Matter:
Clarence Mackay NEWCOMB, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 10586.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Sept. 5, 1944.
A. L. Wirin and J. B. Tietz, both of Los Angeles, Cal. (Hayden C. Covington, of Brooklyn, N. Y., of counsel), for appellant.
Charles H. Carr, U. S. Atty., and James M. Carter and Ray H. Kinnison, Asst. U. S. Attys., all of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Before DENMAN and HEALY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the motion of appellee for affirmance of the judgment of the District Court and the statement of appellant on such motion, it is ordered that said motion ,be and hereby is granted, that a judgment affirming the judgment of the District Court herein be forthwith filed and entered accordingly and that the mandate of this court in this cause issue as provided by Rule 28.