Case Name: Desiree GUSS, Appellant, v. Barry D. MOSTI, Appellee; Eusebio MUNOZ, Appellant, v. Barry D. MOSTI, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-01-28
Citations: 592 So. 2d 373
Docket Number: Nos. 90-2740, 90-2742
Parties: Desiree GUSS, Appellant, v. Barry D. MOSTI, Appellee. Eusebio MUNOZ, Appellant, v. Barry D. MOSTI, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and GERSTEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 592
Pages: 373–373

Head Matter:
Desiree GUSS, Appellant, v. Barry D. MOSTI, Appellee. Eusebio MUNOZ, Appellant, v. Barry D. MOSTI, Appellee.
Nos. 90-2740, 90-2742.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan. 28, 1992.
Gaebe, Murphy, Mullen, Antonelli & Ger-lin, and David Kleinberg, Coral Gables, for appellants.
Paul W. Humbert, Hollywood, for appel-lee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and GERSTEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Luster v. Moore, 78 So.2d 87 (Fla.1955); Canales v. Compania de Vapores Realma, S.A., 564 So.2d 1212 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); L.K. v. Water's Edge Association 532 So.2d 1097 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. McKenzie, 502 So.2d 940 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 511 So.2d 299 (Fla.1987).