Case Name: Joseph Kenneth NEWBOLD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patricia STANSBERRY, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-10-05
Citations: 332 F. App'x 927
Docket Number: No. 09-6304
Parties: Joseph Kenneth NEWBOLD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patricia STANSBERRY, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 332
Pages: 927–928

Head Matter:
Joseph Kenneth NEWBOLD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patricia STANSBERRY, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 09-6304.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 29, 2009.
Decided: Oct. 5, 2009.
Joseph Kenneth Newbold, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Joseph Kenneth Newbold, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Newbold v. Stansberry, No. 1:08-cv-01266-LO-JFA, 2009 WL 86740 (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 12, 2009; entered Jan. 13, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.