Case Name: Sean K. BUFORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2016-09-06
Citations: 497 S.W.3d 872
Docket Number: No. ED 103168
Parties: Sean K. BUFORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 497
Pages: 872–872

Head Matter:
Sean K. BUFORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 103168
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Filed: September 6, 2016
Maleaner Harvey, Missouri Public Defender Office, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Karen L. Kramer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Sean K. Buford appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).