Case Name: BRIDGET O'REILLY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1904-09-30
Citations: 70 N.J.L. 828
Docket Number: 
Parties: BRIDGET O’REILLY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Judges: For affirmance — Ti-ie Chancellor, Garrison, Fort, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Yredenburgi-i, Green, Gray. 9.
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 70
Pages: 828–828

Head Matter:
BRIDGET O’REILLY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Submitted March 22, 1904
Decided September 30, 1904.
On error to the Supreme Court.
For the plaintiff in error, Alan E. Strong and Charles E. Gummere.
For the defendant in error, James L. ICelly and Clarence S. Biddle.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment in this cause is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Mr. Justice Dixon in the Supreme Court, reported in 40 Vroom 119.
For affirmance — Ti-ie Chancellor, Garrison, Fort, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Yredenburgi-i, Green, Gray. 9.
For reversal — None.