Case Name: Rose Ehrlich et al., Appellants, v. Larry Bard et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1982-01-29
Citations: 86 A.D.2d 650
Docket Number: 
Parties: Rose Ehrlich et al., Appellants, v Larry Bard et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 86
Pages: 650–650

Head Matter:
Rose Ehrlich et al., Appellants, v Larry Bard et al., Respondents.

Opinion:
In an action, inter alia, for an accounting, plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Balletta, J.), entered October 22,1980, which is in favor of defendants, upon the trial court's dismissal of the complaint at the close of the plaintiffs' case, at a nonjury trial. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. When plaintiff Francine Bard's conversations with her father are excluded in accordance with CPLR 4519 and the hearsay rule, the proof fails to reach the level of a prima facie case. Lazer, J. P., Gulotta, Cohalan and Bracken, JJ., concur.