Case Name: Commonwealth, Appellant, v. George E. Paul
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1895-10-11
Citations: 170 Pa. 296
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 105
Parties: Commonwealth, Appellant, v. George E. Paul.
Judges: Before Sterrett, C. J., Green, Williams, McGollum, Mitchell, Dean and Fell, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 170
Pages: 296–297

Head Matter:
Commonwealth, Appellant, v. George E. Paul.
Constitutional law — Interstate commerce — Original package — Oleomargarine.
Argued Jan. 18, 1895.
Appeal, No. 105, July T., 1894, by plaintiff, from judgment of Q. S. Phila. Co., Oct. T., 1893, No. 370, on-special verdict.
Before Sterrett, C. J., Green, Williams, McGollum, Mitchell, Dean and Fell, JJ.
Reversed.
See the two next preceding cases.
Carroll B. Williams and John G. Johnson, A. Morton Cooper and George S. Graham, district attorney, with them, for appellant.
Henry B. Edmunds, Bichard C. Bale with him, for appellee.
October 11, 1895:

Opinion:
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Williams,
The questions raised in this case are identical with those just disposed of in Commonwealth v. J. Otis Paul, 170 Pa. 284, in which an opinion is this day filed.
For reasons there stated the judgment is reversed and judgment entered in favor of the commonwealth on the special verdict.
The record is remitted for purposes of sentence and execution.