Case Name: Charlie J. ROBINSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1969-05-13
Citations: 222 So. 2d 439
Docket Number: No. 68-944
Parties: Charlie J. ROBINSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before PEARSON, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 222
Pages: 439–440

Head Matter:
Charlie J. ROBINSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 68-944.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
May 13, 1969.
Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender, and Maurice Jay Kutner, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Jesse J. McCrary, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.
Before PEARSON, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Charlie J. Robinson, was convicted of the offense of entering without breaking a store building with intent to commit a misdemeanor, to-wit: petit lar-eny. He was sentenced to one year in the Division of Corrections of the State of Florida.
It is appellant's contention that the trial court erred in finding him guilty because the evidence did not establish his identity beyond a reasonable doubt.
We must reject appellant's contention. This court does not sit as a second trier of facts. Williams v. Smelt, Fla.1955, 83 So.2d 1. The issue of identity was one of fact to be determined by the trial judge, before whom the case was tried without a jury. It is our function to determine whether the record contains sufficient competent substantial evidence which, if believed, would support the verdict. We have concluded that the trial court's finding as to the defendant's identity and guilt are supported by sufficient, competent and substantial evidence. Gibson v. State, Fla.App.1968, 208 So.2d 128.
No reversible error appearing, the judgment and sentence appealed are affirmed.
Affirmed.