Case Name: SAVITZ-DENBIGH COMPANY, A CORPORATION, RESPONDENT, v. FREDERIC BIGELOW, SUPERINTENDENT OF BUILDINGS OF THE CITY OF NEWARK, ET AL., APPELLANTS
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1928-02-06
Citations: 104 N.J.L. 445
Docket Number: 
Parties: SAVITZ-DENBIGH COMPANY, A CORPORATION, RESPONDENT, v. FREDERIC BIGELOW, SUPERINTENDENT OF BUILDINGS OF THE CITY OF NEWARK, ET AL., APPELLANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 104
Pages: 445–445

Head Matter:
SAVITZ-DENBIGH COMPANY, A CORPORATION, RESPONDENT, v. FREDERIC BIGELOW, SUPERINTENDENT OF BUILDINGS OF THE CITY OF NEWARK, ET AL., APPELLANTS.
Submitted October 28, 1927
Decided February 6, 1928.
Eor the respondent, Thomas Brunetto.
Eor the appellants, Jerome T. Congleton.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Yan Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.