Case Name: Arthur P. STRAHAN, etc., et al., Petitioners, v. Dewey L. GAULDIN, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2001-11-01
Citations: 800 So. 2d 225
Docket Number: No. SC00-1155
Parties: Arthur P. STRAHAN, etc., et al., Petitioners, v. Dewey L. GAULDIN, Respondent.
Judges: WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 800
Pages: 225–225

Head Matter:
Arthur P. STRAHAN, etc., et al., Petitioners, v. Dewey L. GAULDIN, Respondent.
No. SC00-1155.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Nov. 1, 2001.
Richard A. Sherman and Rosemary B. Wilder of Richard A. Sherman, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, FL; Scott Turner of Jack, Wyatt, Tolbert & Thompson, P.A., Melbourne, FL; and Joseph G. Murasko of Dickstein, Reynolds & Woods, West Palm Beach, FL, for Petitioners.
James I. Knudson and Jerry D. McGreal of Knudson & McGreal, P.A., Rockledge, FL; and Edna L. Caruso of Caruso, Burlington, Bohn & Compiani, P.A., West Palm Beach, FL, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted review of the decision of the district court of appeal in Strahan v. Gauldin, 756 So.2d 158 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000), based on express and direct conflict with another decision. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we find that review was improvidently granted. Accordingly, this review proceeding is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., concur.