Case Name: In the Matter of Judith D. Baker, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. JUDITH D. BAKER, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2005-07-27
Citations: 200 Or. App. 719
Docket Number: 30-04-16615; A126301
Parties: In the Matter of Judith D. Baker, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. JUDITH D. BAKER, Appellant.
Judges: Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Brewer, Chief Judge, and Armstrong, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 200
Pages: 719–720

Head Matter:
Submitted on record and briefs June 3,
reversed July 27,2005
In the Matter of Judith D. Baker, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. JUDITH D. BAKER, Appellant.
30-04-16615; A126301
117 P3d 300
James A. Palmer filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Anna M. Joyce, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Brewer, Chief Judge, and Armstrong, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
In this civil commitment case, the trial court found that appellant is a danger to herself and to others because of a mental disorder. ORS 426.005(l)(d)(A). On appeal, appellant argues that the evidence in the record is not sufficient to support the trial court's findings. The state concedes that, based on the clear and convincing evidence standard that the statute requires, ORS 426.130, the evidence is insufficient. After reviewing the record, we conclude that appellant and the state are correct.
Reversed.