Case Name: MARTHA TURNER, Respondent, v. WELLS, FARGO & COMPANY, Defendant, FRANK KIMBALL, Special Administrator, Intervenor, Appellant
Court: Utah Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Utah
Decision Date: 1894-06-04
Citations: 10 Utah 75
Docket Number: No. 418
Parties: MARTHA TURNER, Respondent, v. WELLS, FARGO & COMPANY, Defendant, FRANK KIMBALL, Special Administrator, Intervenor, Appellant.
Judges: MINER, Smith, and Bartoh, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Utah Reports
Volume: 10
Pages: 75–76

Head Matter:
MARTHA TURNER, Respondent, v. WELLS, FARGO & COMPANY, Defendant, FRANK KIMBALL, Special Administrator, Intervenor, Appellant.
(No. 418.
Decided June 4, 1894.
37 P. R. 94.)
Appeal from the district court of the third judicial district, Hon. Chas. S. Zane, Judge.
Action of Martha Turner against Wells, Fargo & Com pany to recover a sum of money on deposit with defendant, and which she claimed was assigned to her by Minnie Barton, the depositor. Frank Kimball, special administrator of the estate of Minnie Barton, intervened, and from the judgment for plaintiff, appeals.-
Reversed.
Mr. E. W. TatlocJa and Mr. W. Q. Hall, for appellant.
Mr. Samuel McDowall, for respondent.

Opinion:
MeeRIti, C. J.:
In the court below, this case and the two cases of Martha Turner, plaintiff and respondent, v. Union National Bank, defendant, and Frank Kimball, intervenor and appellant, and also the case of Martha Turner, plaintiff and respondent, v. The Utah Title Insurance & Trust Company, defendant, and Frank Kimball, intervenor and appellant, were tried together. The same evidence was heard and considered. The findings of fact and conclusions of law and the exceptions were substantially the same, and the same objections and exceptions to the admission of evidence, and the same assignment of errors, were made in each case. The pleadings were alike, and the basis of each action, and the facts and legal principles involved, were the same. All of these cases were submitted upon the argument and submission of the case against the Utah Title Insurance Company (decided at the present term) ante, p. 61 (37 Pac. 91). Upon the authority of the decision in that case, the judgment and decree of the court below in this case is reversed, and the case remanded, with directions to the court below to enter a judgment and decree in favor of the intervenor, canceling the assignment, and delivering the same to the intervenor, and directing the clerk of the court below to pay over the money in his hands in this case as custodian of the court to the intervenor.
MINER, Smith, and Bartoh, JJ., concur.