Case Name: Naim STEWART, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2019-02-05
Citations: 263 So. 3d 277
Docket Number: Nos. 1D16-3644; 1D16-3646
Parties: Naim STEWART, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 263
Pages: 277–278

Head Matter:
Naim STEWART, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Nos. 1D16-3644
1D16-3646
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
February 5, 2019
Candice K. Brower, Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, Michael J. Titus, Assistant Regional Conflict Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
In these Anders appeals, we affirm the orders revoking Appellant's probation and imposing sentence. However, we remand for correction of the written orders of revocation to specify the conditions Appellant was found to have violated. See Davis v. State , 218 So.3d 507 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (affirming revocation of probation in Anders appeal but remanding for court to enter written revocation order specifying conditions of probation violated). Appellant need not be present. See Williams v. State , 145 So.3d 984 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014).
AFFIRMED and REMANDED .
Roberts, Wetherell, and Makar, JJ., concur.
Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).