Case Name: Charles Frank, Appellant, v. Bertha Logar and Another, Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1934-03
Citations: 241 A.D. 748
Docket Number: 
Parties: Charles Frank, Appellant, v. Bertha Logar and Another, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 241
Pages: 748–749

Head Matter:
Charles Frank, Appellant, v. Bertha Logar and Another, Respondents.

Opinion:
Order reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion for a preference granted. On the facts shown, the denial of a prefer enee was not a proper exercise oí discretion. Carswell, .Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Hagarty, J., dissent.