Case Name: Sarah E. ARMSTRONG and D. P. Armstrong, her husband, Appellants, v. CITY OF MIAMI, a municipality incorporated under the laws of the State of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1958-06-12
Citations: 105 So. 2d 494
Docket Number: No. 58-17
Parties: Sarah E. ARMSTRONG and D. P. Armstrong, her husband, Appellants, v. CITY OF MIAMI, a municipality incorporated under the laws of the State of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 105
Pages: 494–494

Head Matter:
Sarah E. ARMSTRONG and D. P. Armstrong, her husband, Appellants, v. CITY OF MIAMI, a municipality incorporated under the laws of the State of Florida, Appellee.
No. 58-17.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
June 12, 1958.
Rehearing Denied, Oct. 22, 1958.
Anderson & Nadeau and David A. Frank, Miami, for appellants.
William L. Pallott, City Atty., and Robert M. Haverfield, Special Counsef, Miami, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on authority of City of Miami v. Ganger, Fla. 1958, 101 So.2d 116.
CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.