Case Name: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Joseph Henry Paul DAVIDSON, Petitioner
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2005-03-15
Citations: 871 A.2d 185
Docket Number: 
Parties: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Joseph Henry Paul DAVIDSON, Petitioner.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 871
Pages: 185–185

Head Matter:
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Joseph Henry Paul DAVIDSON, Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
March 15, 2005.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 15th day of March 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the following questions:
Whether 18 Pa.C.S. § 6312(d) is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad?
Did the General Assembly intend that a person charged under 18 Pa.C.S. § 6312(d) be subjected to individual counts for each piece of child pornography possessed?
If the General Assembly so intended, is it constitutional to impose separate punishments for each conviction?