Case Name: Bolton and Another v. Burnett.-In error
Court: Supreme Court of Indiana
Jurisdiction: Indiana
Decision Date: 1839-11-23
Citations: 5 Blackf. 222
Docket Number: 
Parties: Bolton and Another v. Burnett.—In error.
Judges: 
Reporter: Blackford
Volume: 5
Pages: 222–222

Head Matter:
Bolton and Another v. Burnett.—In error.
Saturday, November 23.

Opinion:
A SEALED note, executed by James A. Bolton ¿nd William Brown, was payable to William Burnett and Daniel Hankins. Hankins assigned his interest in the note to Burnett. Held, that the assignment was valid, and that Burnett might sustain a suit on the note against the makers in his own name. Sneed v. Mitchell, 1 Hayw. R. 289.