Case Name: State of Connecticut v. Larry A. Radicioni; State of Connecticut v. Linda J. Hurst
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1993-10-12
Citations: 33 Conn. App. 903
Docket Number: 11776; 11777
Parties: State of Connecticut v. Larry A. Radicioni State of Connecticut v. Linda J. Hurst
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Appellate Reports
Volume: 33
Pages: 903–904

Head Matter:
State of Connecticut v. Larry A. Radicioni State of Connecticut v. Linda J. Hurst
(11776)
(11777)
Daly, Foti and Landau, Js.
Submitted September 27
decision released October 12, 1993
Michael L. Regan, assistant state’s attorney, with whom, on the brief, was C. Robert Satti, Sr., state’s attorney, for the appellant (state).
Joseph F. Segal, for the appellees (defendants).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This consolidated action is now before us on remand from the Supreme Court. The relevant facts are fully reported in State v. Radicioni, 32 Conn. App. 267, 629 A.2d 432, remanded for reconsideration, 227 Conn. 921, 632 A.2d 698 (1993). We have reconsidered our decision in light of State v. Diaz, 226 Conn. 514, 628 A.2d 567 (1993).
The judgments are reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings.