Case Name: Gail LEVIN, Appellant, v. William LEVIN, individually, and as Trustee of the Shirley Sunshine Levin Declaration of Trust Agreement Dated May 22, 2008, Jessica Lynn Levin, and Benjamin Levin, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2011-08-10
Citations: 67 So. 3d 429
Docket Number: Nos. 4D09-5143, 4D09-5145
Parties: Gail LEVIN, Appellant, v. William LEVIN, individually, and as Trustee of the Shirley Sunshine Levin Declaration of Trust Agreement Dated May 22, 2008, Jessica Lynn Levin, and Benjamin Levin, Appellees.
Judges: CIKLIN, LEVINE, JJ., and THORNTON, JOHN W, JR., Associate Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 67
Pages: 429–429

Head Matter:
Gail LEVIN, Appellant, v. William LEVIN, individually, and as Trustee of the Shirley Sunshine Levin Declaration of Trust Agreement Dated May 22, 2008, Jessica Lynn Levin, and Benjamin Levin, Appellees.
Nos. 4D09-5143, 4D09-5145.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Aug. 10, 2011.
Jennifer S. Carroll of Law Offices of Jennifer S. Carroll, P.A., Palm Beach Gardens, for appellant.
James G. Pressly, Jr. of Pressly & Pressly, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appel-lee Estate of Shirley Levin.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this probate case, appellant appeals a judgment assessing attorney's fees against her share of the estate as well as an order taxing costs against her. The trial court did not make the requisite finding of any bad faith, wrongdoing, or frivolousness before awarding fees against appellant's share of the estate. See Geary v. Butzel Long, P.C., 13 So.3d 149 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009); In re Estate of Lane, 562 So.2d 352 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the trial court to determine, either from the record or after an evidentiary hearing, whether appellant engaged in any bad faith, wrongdoing, or frivolousness in the pursuit of her claim. The trial court should make this determination after deciding whether the will and trust were the product of an "insane delusion," as we directed in the related case of Levin v. Levin, 60 So.3d 1116 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). Although we find no abuse of discretion in the inclusion of the trial notebook and demonstrative aids in the calculation of costs, we nevertheless reverse the order taxing costs, as the award of costs is dependent upon who is ultimately the prevailing party.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
CIKLIN, LEVINE, JJ., and THORNTON, JOHN W, JR., Associate Judge, concur.