Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lucio NAJERA-CORCHADO, a.k.a. Lucio Corchado-Najera, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-01-23
Citations: 674 F. App'x 749
Docket Number: No. 16-10239
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lucio NAJERA-CORCHADO, a.k.a. Lucio Corchado-Najera, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: TROTT, TASHIMA, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 674
Pages: 749–750

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lucio NAJERA-CORCHADO, a.k.a. Lucio Corchado-Najera, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-10239
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted January 18, 2017
Filed January 23, 2017
Krissa Marie Lanham, USPX—Office of the US Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, Louis Charles Uhl, USAO—US Attorneys Office (Yuma), Yuma, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Lucio Najera-Corchado, Pro Se
Before: TROTT, TASHIMA, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Lucio Najera-Corchado appeals from the revocation of supervised release and the 15-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Najera-Corchado's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have considered Najera-Corchado's October 4, 2016, pro se submission. No answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.