Case Name: Jesse G. YATES, III; Melissa Long Yates, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-11-30
Citations: 704 F. App'x 301
Docket Number: No. 17-1285
Parties: Jesse G. YATES, III; Melissa Long Yates, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 704
Pages: 301–302

Head Matter:
Jesse G. YATES, III; Melissa Long Yates, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 17-1285
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: October 30, 2017
Decided: November 30, 2017
Jesse G. Yates, III, Melissa Long Yates, Appellants Pro Se. Robert Carter Elkins, ELKINS RAY, PLLC, Huntington, West Virginia; Jonathan Edgar Hall, PARKER, POE, ADAMS & BERNSTEIN, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jesse G. Yates, III, and Melissa Long Yates appeal the district court's judgment following a jury trial finding in favor of State Farm Fire and Casualty Company on the Yateses' breach of contract claim. We have reviewed the record included on appeal and have found no reversible error. An appellant has the burden of including in the record on appeal a transcript of all parts of the proceedings material to the issues raised on appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 10(b); 4th Cir. R. 10(c). An appellant proceeding on appeal in forma pauperis is entitled to transcripts at Government expense only in certain circumstances. 28 U.S.C. § 753(f) (2012). Appellants have not produced a transcript and have failed to make the requisite showing to qualify for the production of a transcript at Government expense. Thus, the Appellants have waived review of the issues on appeal that depend upon the transcript to show error. See generally Fed. R. App. P. 10(b)(2); Keller v. Prince George's Cty., 827 F.2d 952, 954 n.1 (4th Cir. 1987). Accordingly, we deny Appellants' motion for discovery and we affirm the district court's judgment. In light of this disposition, we deny the Appellee's motion to dismiss the ap peal. We dispense with oral argument as.it would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED