Case Name: Ronnie Jerome WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-11-09
Citations: 569 So. 2d 1336
Docket Number: No. 89-2703
Parties: Ronnie Jerome WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: WIGGINTON, MINER and WOLF, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 569
Pages: 1336–1336

Head Matter:
Ronnie Jerome WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 89-2703.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nov. 9, 1990.
Rehearings Denied Dec. 13, 1990.
Barbara M. Linthicum, Public Defender, Nancy L. Showalter, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Amelia L. Beisner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Ronnie Jerome Williams appeals his judgment and sentence for possession of cocaine, sale of cocaine, and conspiracy to sell cocaine, and raises three issues on appeal: (1) Whether the trial court erred in allowing the introduction of similar-fact evidence; (2) whether the evidence supports a conviction for conspiracy to sell cocaine; (3) whether the appellant can legally be convicted and sentenced for both possession and sale of cocaine arising from the same transaction.
We affirm issues 1 and 2 without comment. We affirm issue 3 in accord with our decision in St. Fabre v. State, 548 So.2d 797 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989), acknowledging conflict with V.A.A. v. State, 561 So.2d 314 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1990).
AFFIRMED.
WIGGINTON, MINER and WOLF, JJ., concur.