Case Name: ARNOLD v. TRAUBERMAN and HUBER
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1923-06-18
Citations: 1 Ohio Law Abs. 586
Docket Number: No. 2182
Parties: ARNOLD v. TRAUBERMAN and HUBER
Judges: 
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 1
Pages: 586–586

Head Matter:
No. 625
ARNOLD v. TRAUBERMAN and HUBER
Ohio Appeals, First District, Hamilton County
No. 2182.
Decided June 18, 1923
This opinion has not been published except in Abstract.
NEGLIGENCE — Automobile collision causing injury to pedestrian..
Attorneys — Taft & Taft, for Arnold; DeCamp, Sutphin & Brumleve, for Trauberman and Huber.

Opinion:
HAMILTON, J.
Epitomized Opinion
Trauberman sued Arnold and Huber for personal injuries and recovered judgment against Arnold in Cincinnati Municipal Court. Common Pleas affirmed the judgment. Arnold prosecuted error to this court on grounds that charge of Municipal Court was erroneous, and judgment was against weight of evidence. Trauberman was injured when the automobiles of Arnold and Huber, collided, crashing Huber's automobile into boulevard light which snapped off and struck Trauberman, who was stancj ing nearby. Court of Appeals in affirming judgment held:
1. The judgment is supported by the evidence.
2. There was no prejudicial error in the charge of the court to the jury on the law applicable to the case.