Case Name: Oscar H. STEINER, Appellant, v. Joseph WERTHEIMER, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1957-12-10
Citations: 252 F.2d 788
Docket Number: No. 13150
Parties: Oscar H. STEINER, Appellant, v. Joseph WERTHEIMER, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 252
Pages: 788–789

Head Matter:
Oscar H. STEINER, Appellant, v. Joseph WERTHEIMER, Appellee.
No. 13150.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
Dec. 10, 1957.
Jack G. Day, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellant.
Sidney N. Weitz, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellee.
Before ALLEN and MILLER, Circuit Judges, and BOYD, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is a companion case to Steiner v. Wertheimer, 6 Cir., 250 F.2d 574, between the same parties. Although it presents an alleged different cause of action the controversy herein arises out of the same factual background and was disposed of by the District Court by entry of an order sustaining defendant's motion for summary judgment in the same manner as in the other case. The record presents to us the same problem as was presented in that case.
For the reasons stated in the Per Curi-am issued in that case, the judgment of the District Court is reversed and the cause remanded to the District Court for further proceedings consistent with the views expressed therein.