Case Name: James Edward (ED) HICKAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF GRESHAM, Political subdivision of the State of Oregon, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-12-17
Citations: 83 F. App'x 262
Docket Number: No. 02-35977; D.C. No. CV-00-00762-REJ
Parties: James Edward (ED) HICKAM, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. CITY OF GRESHAM, Political subdivision of the State of Oregon, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 83
Pages: 262–263

Head Matter:
James Edward (ED) HICKAM, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. CITY OF GRESHAM, Political subdivision of the State of Oregon, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 02-35977.
D.C. No. CV-00-00762-REJ.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Dec. 5, 2003.
Decided Dec. 17, 2003.
David C. Force, Law Offices of David C. Force, Eugene, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Steven A. Kraemer, Hoffman, Hart & Wagner, LLP, Robert S. Wagner, David C. Lewis, Miller & Wagner LLP, Portland, OR, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before KLEINFELD, GOULD, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
We affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge and adopted by the district court.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.