Case Name: IN RE Carolyn M. CROWLEY A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals Bar Registration No. 444797
Court: District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Decision Date: 2019-07-25
Citations: 212 A.3d 827
Docket Number: No. 19-BG-368
Parties: IN RE Carolyn M. CROWLEY
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 212
Pages: 827–827

Head Matter:
IN RE Carolyn M. CROWLEY
A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Bar Registration No. 444797
No. 19-BG-368
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
FILED July 25, 2019
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
On consideration of the certified order of the Supreme Court of Florida suspending respondent from the practice of law in the state of Florida for 91 days; this court's May 3, 2019, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing her to show cause why the functional-equivalent reciprocal discipline of a 91-day suspension with a fitness requirement should not be imposed; the statement of Disciplinary Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline; and it appearing that respondent failed to file a response to the court's show cause order but did file her D.C. Bar R. XI § 14(g) affidavit on May 29, 2019; it is
ORDERED that Carolyn M. Crowley, also known as Carolyn M. Holt, is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a period of 91 days nunc pro tunc to May 29, 2019, with reinstatement contingent on a showing of fitness. See In re Sibley , 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010), and In re Fuller , 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate).