Case Name: Charles W. PENLAND, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF GREER, SOUTH CAROLINA; Kenneth Bobo, Affiant; Mayor, City of Greer, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-02-18
Citations: 311 F. App'x 665
Docket Number: No. 08-7684
Parties: Charles W. PENLAND, Sr., Plaintiff—Appellant, v. CITY OF GREER, SOUTH CAROLINA; Kenneth Bobo, Affiant; Mayor, City of Greer, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 311
Pages: 665–665

Head Matter:
Charles W. PENLAND, Sr., Plaintiff—Appellant, v. CITY OF GREER, SOUTH CAROLINA; Kenneth Bobo, Affiant; Mayor, City of Greer, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 08-7684.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 29, 2008.
Decided: Feb. 18, 2009.
Charles W. Penland, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Charles W. Penland, Sr., appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2000) complaint. On appeal, Pen-land has failed to raise any arguments relevant to the district court's reasoning for dismissing his complaint; thus, he has abandoned his claims. Edwards v. City of Goldsboro, 178 F.3d 231, 241 n. 6 (4th Cir.1999); 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.