Case Name: Robert SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-11-09
Citations: 4 S.W.3d 660
Docket Number: No. ED 75736
Parties: Robert SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE CRANE, P.J., ROBERT DOWD Jr., J., SHERRI SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 4
Pages: 660–661

Head Matter:
Robert SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 75736.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Nov. 9, 1999.
Jennifer S. Walsh, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty.Gen., Andrea L. Mazza, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE CRANE, P.J., ROBERT DOWD Jr., J., SHERRI SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM DECISION
PER CURIAM.
Movant appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Jefferson County dismissing his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief as untimely. He acknowledges his motion was filed out of time, but he challenges the constitutionality of the Rule 24.035 time requirements.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). The Missouri Supreme Court has held the time limits in Rule 24.035 are constitutional and mandatory. Day v. State, 770 S.W.2d 692, 695 (Mo. banc 1989), cert. denied sub nom. Walker v. Missouri, 493 U.S. 866, 110 S.Ct. 186, 107 L.Ed.2d 141 (1989). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).