Case Name: Thomas GLAUB and Cynthia Glaub, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. CENTRAL GARDEN & PET CO., et al., Defendants/Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-07-29
Citations: 138 S.W.3d 739
Docket Number: No. ED 82124
Parties: Thomas GLAUB and Cynthia Glaub, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. CENTRAL GARDEN & PET CO., et al., Defendants/Respondents.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 138
Pages: 739–740

Head Matter:
Thomas GLAUB and Cynthia Glaub, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. CENTRAL GARDEN & PET CO., et al., Defendants/Respondents.
No. ED 82124.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
July 29, 2003.
Althea P. Johns, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Peter von Gontard, Nancy L. Cai'dinale, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiffs, Thomas Glaub and Cynthia Glaub, appeal from the judgment dismissing their action that alleged Thomas Glaub suffered injuries when he used a flea treatment. No error of law appears and an opinion would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).