Case Name: OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Harry ROSS and Katherine Ross, his wife, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1985-02-12
Citations: 463 So. 2d 1219
Docket Number: No. 84-889
Parties: OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Harry ROSS and Katherine Ross, his wife, Appellees.
Judges: Before HENDRY, NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 463
Pages: 1219–1219

Head Matter:
OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Harry ROSS and Katherine Ross, his wife, Appellees.
No. 84-889.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 12, 1985.
Rehearing Denied March 20, 1985.
Barwick & Dillian and Lyndall M. Lambert, Miami Shores, for appellants.
Richard A. Barnett, Hollywood, and Michael Gerrod, for appellees.
Before HENDRY, NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Dragon v. Grant, 429 So.2d 1329 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Quinn v. Millard, 358 So.2d 1378 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Zack v. Centro Espanol Hospital, Inc., 319 So.2d 34 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975); LaBarbera v. Millan Builders, Inc., 191 So.2d 619 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966); see Jaime v. Vilberg, 363 So.2d 386, 388 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978) (hospital records are admissible under the business record exception to the hearsay rule only upon the laying of a proper foundation).