Case Name: Dale CHAPMAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-12-04
Citations: 683 So. 2d 647
Docket Number: No. 95-3213
Parties: Dale CHAPMAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before COPE, GERSTEN and GODERICH, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 683
Pages: 647–647

Head Matter:
Dale CHAPMAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 95-3213.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 4, 1996.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Julie M. Levitt, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Douglas Gurnic, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before COPE, GERSTEN and GODERICH, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Dale Chapman appeals a final judgment of conviction for burglary of a conveyance and petit theft. The sole point on appeal is whether the petit theft conviction should have been classified as a second degree misdemeanor rather than a first degree misdemeanor. See § 812.014(2)(d), Fla. Stat. (1993). As the presentence investigation does not show a prior theft conviction, it appears that the petit theft conviction must be reduced to a second degree misdemeanor, see id., and the sentence on that count must be reduced accordingly.
The conviction and sentence on the conviction for burglary of a conveyance are not challenged and are affirmed.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for correction of count 2.