Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Daniel Perez NEGRON, also known as Daniel Perez, also known as Daniel Negron Perez, also known as Daniel Perez-Negron, also known as Raul Gonzales, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-08-21
Citations: 475 F. App'x 977
Docket Number: No. 11-20701
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Daniel Perez NEGRON, also known as Daniel Perez, also known as Daniel Negron Perez, also known as Daniel Perez-Negron, also known as Raul Gonzales, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before SMITH, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 475
Pages: 977–977

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Daniel Perez NEGRON, also known as Daniel Perez, also known as Daniel Negron Perez, also known as Daniel Perez-Negron, also known as Raul Gonzales, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-20701
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 21, 2012.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Lourdes Rodriguez, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before SMITH, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Daniel Perez Negron has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Negron has not filed a response and has been removed from the United States. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as frivolous, see 5th Cir. R. 42.2, and in part as moot. See United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis, 483 F.3d 381, 382-83 (5th Cir.2007).
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.