Case Name: James Arthur BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-12-22
Citations: 627 So. 2d 1342
Docket Number: No. 92-02917
Parties: James Arthur BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and BROWNELL, SCOTT M., Associate Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 627
Pages: 1342–1343

Head Matter:
James Arthur BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 92-02917.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Dec. 22, 1993.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Brad Permar, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Susan D. Dunlevy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
BLUE, Judge.
We previously reversed this ease because of improper prosecutorial comments during closing argument. Brown v. State, 593 So.2d 1210 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). On retrial, the same prosecutor made the same improper argument regarding the appellant's failure to call a witness. Accordingly, we reverse the conviction and remand this case, for a second time, for a new trial.
CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and BROWNELL, SCOTT M., Associate Judge, concur.