Case Name: Alfred A. Hulse et al., Respondents, v. Joseph Mack et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1999-05-24
Citations: 261 A.D.2d 580
Docket Number: 
Parties: Alfred A. Hulse et al., Respondents, v Joseph Mack et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 261
Pages: 580–580

Head Matter:
Alfred A. Hulse et al., Respondents, v Joseph Mack et al., Appellants.
[688 NYS2d 922]

Opinion:
—In an action, inter alia, for declaratory and injunctive relief, the defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (D'Emilio, J.), dated March 23, 1998, as denied their cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly determined that there are issues of fact concerning the intention of the grantors of the easement, and the parties' conduct prior to and subsequent to the grant, which preclude the granting of summary judgment (see, Lewis v Young, 92 NY2d 443, 453-454; Phillips v Jacobsen, 117 AD2d 785, 786). O'Brien, J. P., Ritter, Joy, Altman and Smith, JJ., concur.