Case Name: James MEADORS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2016-03-15
Citations: 483 S.W.3d 469
Docket Number: No. ED 102824
Parties: James MEADORS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Robert M. Clayton III, P. J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 483
Pages: 469–469

Head Matter:
James MEADORS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 102824
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Filed: March 15, 2016
For Appellant: Matthew W. Huckeby, 1010 Market St., Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.
For Respondent: Chris Koster, Attorney General, Karen L. Kramer, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.
Before Robert M. Clayton III, P. J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
James Meadors appeals the denial without an evidentiary hearing of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Jones raises one point on appeal: that trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel should have raised the defense of entrapment. We affirm.
The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).