Case Name: Findley Robb, Appellant, v. Ferdinand Schmidt et al., Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Missouri
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1864-10
Citations: 35 Mo. 290
Docket Number: 
Parties: Findley Robb, Appellant, v. Ferdinand Schmidt et al., Respondents.
Judges: Judges Bay and Dryden concur.
Reporter: Missouri Reports
Volume: 35
Pages: 290–290

Head Matter:
Findley Robb, Appellant, v. Ferdinand Schmidt et al., Respondents.
Evidence — Declarations.—The declarations of the holder of a promissory note assigned after maturity but made before assignment, are competent evidence against the assignee.
Appeal from Franklin Circuit Court.
Davis, Evans £f Davis, for appellant.
The court manifestly erred in admitting the declaration of Nagel, the assignee of the note sued on, to impeach the title of Bobb the plaintiff, who was his assignee and sued as assignee. The declarations of Nagel, given in evidence by the defendant, were made in relation to facts which had occurred before the assignment was made and should have been excluded. (R. C. 1855, Witnesses, ^ 6, p. 1577-78-, Parish v. Frampton, 82 Mo. 396; Caldwell v. Garner, 31 Mo. 131.)
Gale, for respondents.

Opinion:
Bates, Judge,
delivered the opinion of the court.
Robb sued Schmidt upon a negotiable promissory note made by Schmidt to Nagel, and by Nagel assigned to Robb after maturity. Schmidt pleaded payment, and at the trial gave in evidence delarations of Nagel tending to sustain the plea of payment made after the maturity of the note, and while he still held it; that is, before he assigned it to Robb; and the only question presented by the case is as to the admissibility of that evidence. There can be no doubt that the evidence was properly admitted. The rule is otherwise as to negotiable paper negotiated before maturity, to a bona fide endorsee without notice. A general objection was made to some testimony, but the objection is so made that the record does not show what it really was.
Judgment having been given for the defendant, it will be affirmed.
Judges Bay and Dryden concur.