Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Bryan SEDDENS, Appellant; Bryan SEDDENS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-06-06
Citations: 899 S.W.2d 602
Docket Number: Nos. 60654, 63759
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Bryan SEDDENS, Appellant. Bryan SEDDENS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before AHRENS, P.J., and SIMON and KAROHL, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 899
Pages: 602–603

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Bryan SEDDENS, Appellant. Bryan SEDDENS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 60654, 63759.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
June 6, 1995.
S. Paige Canfield, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Michael J. Spillane, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before AHRENS, P.J., and SIMON and KAROHL, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
Defendant appeals the denial of his Batson motion after this court remanded for a Batson hearing. State v. Seddens, 878 S.W.2d 89, 93-94 (Mo.App.1994). We affirm.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).