Case Name: Jakob S. Schaechter, Respondent, v. Regency Properties, Inc., Doing Business as Regency Properties-Better Homes and Gardens, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff. Ben Di Fiore et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1985-12-20
Citations: 115 A.D.2d 982
Docket Number: Appeal No. 2
Parties: Jakob S. Schaechter, Respondent, v Regency Properties, Inc., Doing Business as Regency Properties-Better Homes and Gardens, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff. Ben Di Fiore et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 115
Pages: 982–982

Head Matter:
Jakob S. Schaechter, Respondent, v Regency Properties, Inc., Doing Business as Regency Properties-Better Homes and Gardens, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff. Ben Di Fiore et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellants.
(Appeal No. 2.)

Opinion:
Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law and facts, without costs. Same memorandum as in Schaechter v Regency Props. ([Appeal No. 1], 115 AD2d 981). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Pine, J.—real estate commissions.) Present—Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Denman, Boomer and Schnepp, JJ.