Case Name: Aila JANTUNEN, Appellant, v. Kauko JANTUNEN, Appellee; Kauko JANTUNEN, Appellant, v. Aila JANTUNEN, Appellee; Kauko JANTUNEN, Appellant, v. Aila JANTUNEN, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1987-04-15
Citations: 505 So. 2d 42
Docket Number: Nos. 85-2604, 4-86-1095 and 4-86-1896
Parties: Aila JANTUNEN, Appellant, v. Kauko JANTUNEN, Appellee. Kauko JANTUNEN, Appellant, v. Aila JANTUNEN, Appellee. Kauko JANTUNEN, Appellant, v. Aila JANTUNEN, Appellee.
Judges: HERSEY, C.J., GUNTHER, J., and RIVKIND, LEONARD, Associate Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 505
Pages: 42–42

Head Matter:
Aila JANTUNEN, Appellant, v. Kauko JANTUNEN, Appellee. Kauko JANTUNEN, Appellant, v. Aila JANTUNEN, Appellee. Kauko JANTUNEN, Appellant, v. Aila JANTUNEN, Appellee.
Nos. 85-2604, 4-86-1095 and 4-86-1896.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
April 15, 1987.
J. Mark Maynor of Beverly & Freeman, West Palm Beach, for Aila Jantunen.
Barbara J. Compiani of Edna L. Caruso, P.A., and Montgomery, Searcy & Denney, P.A., West Palm Beach, for Kauko Jantu-nen.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
A review of the record fails to disclose an abuse of discretion by the vacation of a default and final judgment. See Zimmerman v. Vinylgrain Industries, Inc., 464 So.2d 1353 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). Therefore, we affirm in No. 4-86-1896. In view of this affirmance, the appeals in Nos. 4-86-1095 and 85-2604 have been rendered moot and, accordingly, are dismissed.
Affirmed in No. 4-86-1896. Dismissed in Nos. 4-86-1095 and 85-2604.
HERSEY, C.J., GUNTHER, J., and RIVKIND, LEONARD, Associate Judge, concur.