Case Name: Christopher COUCH, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-01-24
Citations: 182 S.W.3d 717
Docket Number: No. ED 85702
Parties: Christopher COUCH, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J. and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J. and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 182
Pages: 717–717

Head Matter:
Christopher COUCH, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 85702.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Jan. 24, 2006.
Scott Thompson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Roger W. Johnson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J. and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J. and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Christopher Couch, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that his plea counsel rendered ineffective assistance by promising him that he would not receive more than a ten-year sentence if he pled guilty.
The motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).