Case Name: Robert HAYNES, Claimant/Appellant, v. DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2010-11-23
Citations: 326 S.W.3d 559
Docket Number: No. ED 94687
Parties: Robert HAYNES, Claimant/Appellant, v. DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 326
Pages: 559–560

Head Matter:
Robert HAYNES, Claimant/Appellant, v. DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 94687.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Nov. 23, 2010.
Robert C. Haynes, Florissant, MO, pro se.
Ninion S. Riley, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Claimant, Robert Haynes, appeals pro se from the Order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the decision of the Appeals Tribunal of the Division of Employment Security finding claimant ineligible for unemployment benefits because claimant was not available for work. The Order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm the Order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).