Case Name: Adam Dobel vs. J. M. Delavallade. E. P. Delavallade, Assignee
Court: Louisiana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1878-04
Citations: 30 La. Ann. 604
Docket Number: No. 7043
Parties: Adam Dobel vs. J. M. Delavallade. E. P. Delavallade, Assignee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Louisiana Annual Reports
Volume: 30
Pages: 604–606

Head Matter:
No. 7043.
Adam Dobel vs. J. M. Delavallade. E. P. Delavallade, Assignee.
The transcript of an appeal from an order of seizure and sale need not contain any of the proceedings on the injunction taken out to arrest the seizure and sale, since such proceedings could not be considered by this court on such an appeal.
The hold'er of a duly paraphed mortgage note, on which certain credits are indorsed, is entitled to proceed by executory process for the balance of the note, against the mortgaged property, and the purchaser of the property, whose assumption of the payment of the note appears by a notarial act of mortgage containing the pact de non alienando. If such purchaser has gone into bankruptcy, and is represented by an assignee, the certificate of a register in bankruptcy is sufficient evidence of the assignee’s appointment and acceptance.
APPEAL from the Fifth Judicial District Court, parish of Iberville. Crowell, J., acting for McVea, J., recused.
Chas. O. Lauve for plaintiff and appellee.
George Wailes and Alex. Hebert for defendant.

Opinion:
On the Motion to Dismiss.
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Mare, J.
This is a proceeding via executiva. Appellee moves to dismiss on the ground that the transcript is incomplete; that Delavallade applied for and obtained an injunction by which the sale was arrested; that the injunction was dissolved; and that the proceedings on that injunction are not copied into the transcript.
The appeal in this case is taken from the order of seizure and sale, which was granted on the eleventh of October, 1877. The clerk certifies that the transcript contains " all the documents filed and proceedings had," etc.
The appeal from the order of seizure and sale brings up for review nothing but that order; and any subsequent proceedings, whether by injunction or otherwise, would be out of place in the transcript. Nothing that may have occurred subsequent to the granting of the order of seizure and sale could be considered in determining the only question which an appeal from that order brings before us.
The motion to dismiss is overruled.