Case Name: Lewis SAUNDERS, III, Sandra Saunders, and Susan Mikesell, Appellant, v. A BETTER BLIND, INC., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2007-05-02
Citations: 954 So. 2d 755
Docket Number: No. 06-2912
Parties: Lewis SAUNDERS, III, Sandra Saunders, and Susan Mikesell, Appellant, v. A BETTER BLIND, INC., Appellee.
Judges: Before COPE, C.J., and ROTHENBERG, J., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 954
Pages: 755–755

Head Matter:
Lewis SAUNDERS, III, Sandra Saunders, and Susan Mikesell, Appellant, v. A BETTER BLIND, INC., Appellee.
No. 06-2912.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 2, 2007.
Jonathan R. Saunders, for appellant.
Allan M. Glaser, for appellee.
Before COPE, C.J., and ROTHENBERG, J., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal of an order denying the appellants' motion to dismiss or transfer the action on account of improper venue. Because the complaint alleges that the overt act in furtherance of the alleged conspiracy, see Lipsig v. Ramlawi, 760 So.2d 170, 180 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), occurred in Miami-Dade County, it follows that Miami-Dade County is a permissible venue. See § 47.011, Fla. Stat. (2006); Lane v. Hemophilia of the Sunshine State, Inc., 793 So.2d 992, 995-96 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Straske v. McGillicuddy, 388 So.2d 1334, 1336 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); see also Tucker v. Fianson, 484 So.2d 1370, 1371 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).
Affirmed.