Case Name: Perry RUSHING, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2011-06-07
Citations: 342 S.W.3d 370
Docket Number: No. ED 94955
Parties: Perry RUSHING, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 342
Pages: 370–370

Head Matter:
Perry RUSHING, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 94955.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
June 7, 2011.
Lisa M. Stroup, Saint Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Dora A. Fichter, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Perry Rushing appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).