Case Name: Peter G. BROOKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Agustin Teodoro TRIGUERO, d/b/a Argentimports, trading as Taft Auto Service, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-05-24
Citations: 379 F. App'x 296
Docket Number: No. 09-1995
Parties: Peter G. BROOKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Agustín Teodoro TRIGUERO, d/b/a Argentimports, trading as Taft Auto Service, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 379
Pages: 296–296

Head Matter:
Peter G. BROOKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Agustín Teodoro TRIGUERO, d/b/a Argentimports, trading as Taft Auto Service, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 09-1995.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 20, 2010.
Decided: May 24, 2010.
Michael Stephen Rothman, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellant.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Peter G. Brooks appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil action based on res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons 'stated by the district court. Brooks v. Triguero, No. 8:08-cv-03153-DKC (D.Md. July 10 & July 28, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED