Case Name: Emanuels Trotta, Respondent, v. Henry A. Baldwin and Others, Defendants, and Herman Rosenstein and Kalman Noselson, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1930-03
Citations: 228 A.D. 841
Docket Number: 
Parties: Emanuels Trotta, Respondent, v. Henry A. Baldwin and Others, Defendants, and Herman Rosenstein and Kalman Noselson, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 228
Pages: 841–841

Head Matter:
Emanuels Trotta, Respondent, v. Henry A. Baldwin and Others, Defendants, and Herman Rosenstein and Kalman Noselson, Appellants.

Opinion:
Order denying motion of defendants Rosenstein and Noselson to dismiss complaint as to them upon the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to said defendants to answer within ten days from service of the order herein upon payment of such costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.