Case Name: VAN CAMP & BENNION, P.S. a Professional Service Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Paul Beene, District Director of Internal Revenue Washington District, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-07-17
Citations: 70 F. App'x 937
Docket Number: No. 02-35380
Parties: VAN CAMP & BENNION, P.S. a Professional Service Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Paul Beene, District Director of Internal Revenue Washington District, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, BEEZER and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 70
Pages: 937–938

Head Matter:
VAN CAMP & BENNION, P.S. a Professional Service Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Paul Beene, District Director of Internal Revenue Washington District, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 02-35380.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 20, 2003.
Decided July 17, 2003.
Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, BEEZER and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suit able for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Taxpayer Van Camp & Bennion, a Professional Service Corporation, appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the United States. We previously remanded a related case to the district court to consider whether this taxpayer had reasonable cause for failure to deposit and pay timely federal employment taxes. See Van Camp & Bennion v. United States, 251 F.3d 862, 867-68 (9th Cir.2001). The district court concluded that reasonable cause did not exist. We affirm.
The taxpayer contends that its financial difficulties constituted reasonable cause for its failure to pay withholding taxes. The record shows, however, that the corporation was receiving large monthly deposits that were sufficient to meet its tax obligations. The record also establishes that during the relevant tax years, the corporation was paying its president over $100,000 per year. The corporation therefore did not show that it "exercised ordinary business care and prudence in providing for payment of [its] tax liability." 26 C.F.R. § 301.6651-l(c)(l).
The taxpayer also argues that the illness of its president constitutes reasonable cause for the failure to pay taxes. The record does not support this contention. The undisputed evidence shows that the corporation continued to operate during the relevant time period, and continued to attract business. The president remained available to, discuss business during his illness, and was not the only person with authority to conduct the corporation's financial transactions.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.