Case Name: George T. Shambow, Respondent v. The New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company, Appellant
Court: New York Superior Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1891-07-02
Citations: 27 Jones & S. 590
Docket Number: 
Parties: George T. Shambow, Respondent v. The New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Reports of cases argued and determined in the Superior Court of the city of New York
Volume: 59
Pages: 590–590

Head Matter:
George T. Shambow, Respondent v. The New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company, Appellant.
Decided July 2, 1891.
Appeal from judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff upon the' verdict' of a jury, and from order denying defendant’s motion Upon the judge’s minutes for a new trial.
Page & Taft, for appellant.
Thomas P. Wickes, for respondent.
Before Freedman, Dugro and Gildersleeve, JJ,

Opinion:
The questions involved were as to defendant's negligence and plaintiff's contributory negligence. The Court (Freedman, J., writing, Dugro and Gildersleeve, JJ., concurring) held, that under the evidence those questions were properly submitted to thé jury, and that the evidence supported the verdict and affirmed the judgment and order, with costs.