Case Name: Edward Wiedman, an Infant, by Leonard Wiedman, His Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. Frank Kinzly, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1910-10
Citations: 140 A.D. 919
Docket Number: 
Parties: Edward Wiedman, an Infant, by Leonard Wiedman, His Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. Frank Kinzly, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 140
Pages: 919–920

Head Matter:
Edward Wiedman, an Infant, by Leonard Wiedman, His Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. Frank Kinzly, Respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that the court erred in charging the jury as matter of law that the defendant was justified in arresting the plaintiff and taking him into custody. All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., and Williams, J., who dissented upon the ground that there was a misunderstanding between the court and counsel, and upon the disagree- ment occurring the court then left to the jury the question of plaintiff's right to recover.