Case Name: Christopher CAMMILLERI, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2001-01-19
Citations: 779 So. 2d 551
Docket Number: No. 2D00-3682
Parties: Christopher CAMMILLERI, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: FULMER, A.C.J., and STRINGER and DAVIS,-JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 779
Pages: 551–551

Head Matter:
Christopher CAMMILLERI, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D00-3682.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Jan. 19, 2001.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Christopher Cammilleri appeals the summary denial of his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm in part and reverse in part.
Cammilleri stated that he was sentenced after he entered a plea agreement which required that he be given a guidelines sentence. He now contends that he was improperly assessed fifty-four victim injury points because the information filed against him does not allege any victim injury. This is a facially sufficient claim which the trial court did not address. See Nastri v. State, 775 So.2d 355 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). On remand, the trial court must reconsider this claim.
Cammilleri also contended that the trial judge expressed impermissible bias when resentencing him. This claim is not cognizable in a rule 3.800 motion, and the trial court is affirmed in its denial of this claim.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
FULMER, A.C.J., and STRINGER and DAVIS,-JJ., concur.