Case Name: James L. SINGLETON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1999-03-17
Citations: 731 So. 2d 723
Docket Number: No. 97-05343
Parties: James L. SINGLETON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and WHATLEY and CASANUEVA, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 731
Pages: 723–724

Head Matter:
James L. SINGLETON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 97-05343.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
March 17, 1999.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Robert D. Rosen, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Dale E. Tarpley, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Ap-pellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the judgments and sentences in this case, which were entered after the defendant pleaded nolo contendere with a written, open plea agreement. The two concurrent sentences of twenty-five years' imprisonment as a habitual offender for salé of cocaine are lawful. However, this record demonstrates unpreserved sentencing errors in other concurrent sentences, which the State concedes are illegal sen tences. The trial court can correct these errors at any time on its own motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), or the defendant can request that relief by postconviction motion.
Affirmed.
ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and WHATLEY and CASANUEVA, JJ., Concur.