Case Name: Bradford EDWARDS and Tia Edwards, as Natural Tutors of Blaine Edwards, a Minor v. ALBERTSON'S LLC and John and/or Jane Doe I-II
Court: Louisiana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 2017-05-01
Citations: 218 So. 3d 95
Docket Number: NO. 2017-CC-0233
Parties: Bradford EDWARDS and Tia Edwards, as Natural Tutors of Blaine Edwards, a Minor v. ALBERTSON’S LLC and John and/or Jane Doe I-II
Judges: GENOVESE, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 218
Pages: 95–95

Head Matter:
Bradford EDWARDS and Tia Edwards, as Natural Tutors of Blaine Edwards, a Minor v. ALBERTSON’S LLC and John and/or Jane Doe I-II
NO. 2017-CC-0233
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
05/01/2017
GENOVESE, J., additionally concurs and assigns reasons.

Opinion:
GENOVESE, JUSTICE,
additionally concurs.
hi concur in the granting of this writ. However, in my view this matter should not be remanded to the court of appeal. Rather, this court should assign the case for briefing and permit the parties an opportunity to request oral argument as set forth in La. C.C.P. art. 966(H).
. La. C.C.P. art. 966(H) provides:
On review, an appellate court shall not reverse a trial court's denial of a motion for summary judgment and grant a summary judgment dismissing a case or a party without assigning the case for briefing and permitting the parties an opportunity to request oral argument.