Case Name: SCOTT TIMBER COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-02-22
Citations: 499 F. App'x 973
Docket Number: No. 2011-5092
Parties: SCOTT TIMBER COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before RADER, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, LOURIE, DYK, PROST, MOORE, O’MALLEY, REYNA, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Claims Reporter
Volume: 110
Pages: 973–974

Head Matter:
SCOTT TIMBER COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 2011-5092.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Feb. 22, 2013.
Alan I. Saltman, Ruth G. Tiger, Smith, Currie & Hancock, LLP, Washington, DC, James J. White, University of Michigan Law School, Ann Arbor, MI, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Ellen M. Lynch, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before RADER, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, LOURIE, DYK, PROST, MOORE, O’MALLEY, REYNA, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ON PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC
PER CURIAM.
ORDER
A combined petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc was filed by Plaintiff-Appellee, and a response thereto was invited by the court and filed by Defendant-Appellant. The petition for panel rehearing was considered by the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition for rehearing en banc, response, and brief of amicus curiae Timber Products Company were referred to the circuit judges who are authorized to request a poll of whether to rehear the appeal en banc. A poll was requested, taken, and failed.
Upon consideration thereof,
It Is ORDERED That:
(1) The petition of Plaintiff-Appellee for panel rehearing is denied.
(2) The petition of Plaintiff-Appellee for rehearing en banc is denied.
(3) The mandate of the court will issue on March 1, 2013.