Case Name: Catherine E. Lister, complainant-respondent, v. Nathan Vogel et al., defendants-appellants
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1932-02-01
Citations: 110 N.J. Eq. 35
Docket Number: 
Parties: Catherine E. Lister, complainant-respondent, v. Nathan Vogel et al., defendants-appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 110
Pages: 35–41

Head Matter:
Catherine E. Lister, complainant-respondent, v. Nathan Vogel et al., defendants-appellants.
[Argued May 26th, 1931.
Decided February 1st, 1932.]
Messrs. Cook & Stout and Mr. Merritt Lane, for the appellants.
Messrs. Gerand, Matlack & Lautman, for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the conclusions of Vice-Chancellor Berry.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Teenohabd, Paekee, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Daly, Donges, Van Buskiek, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.