Case Name: Rudolph HOSKINS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Lawrence E. WILSON, Warden, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1970-11-13
Citations: 432 F.2d 1355
Docket Number: No. 24670
Parties: Rudolph HOSKINS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Lawrence E. WILSON, Warden, Appellee.
Judges: Before CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge, JERTBERG, Senior Circuit Judge, and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 432
Pages: 1355–1356

Head Matter:
Rudolph HOSKINS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Lawrence E. WILSON, Warden, Appellee.
No. 24670.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Nov. 13, 1970.
Richard R. Day (argued), Rohnert Park, Cal., for appellant.
James Cuneo (argued), Deputy Atty. Gen., Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen., John P. Oakes, Deputy Atty. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge, JERTBERG, Senior Circuit Judge, and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The decision of the district court is affirmed. See Parker v. North Carolina, 397 U.S. 790, 90 S.Ct. 1458, 25 L.Ed.2d 785 (1969); McMann v. Richardson, 397 U.S. 759, 90 S.Ct. 1441, 25 L.Ed.2d 763 (1969); Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742, 90 S.Ct. 1463, 25 L.Ed.2d 747 (1969); and Moss v. Craven, 9th Cir., 427 F.2d 139 (1970).