Case Name: Jeffrey COLEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John JABE; T. Jones; Catherine Turner; Robert Bivens; Harold Clarke; Stanley Young; Gene Johnson; Roy Walz; Ron Hall; G. Robinson; John Garman; K.S. Richardson; S. Meeks; Major Batton; D.J. Hasty-Martin; Lou Cei; Randy Myers; Ted Durr; Dave Hammond; Jones Express Music; Keefe Commissary; The Virginia Department of Corrections; Unknown Members of the Faith Review Committee, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-04-03
Citations: 470 F. App'x 153
Docket Number: No. 11-7596
Parties: Jeffrey COLEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John JABE; T. Jones; Catherine Turner; Robert Bivens; Harold Clarke; Stanley Young; Gene Johnson; Roy Walz; Ron Hall; G. Robinson; John Garman; K.S. Richardson; S. Meeks; Major Batton; D.J. Hasty-Martin; Lou Cei; Randy Myers; Ted Durr; Dave Hammond; Jones Express Music; Keefe Commissary; The Virginia Department of Corrections; Unknown Members of the Faith Review Committee, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 470
Pages: 153–153

Head Matter:
Jeffrey COLEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John JABE; T. Jones; Catherine Turner; Robert Bivens; Harold Clarke; Stanley Young; Gene Johnson; Roy Walz; Ron Hall; G. Robinson; John Garman; K.S. Richardson; S. Meeks; Major Batton; D.J. Hasty-Martin; Lou Cei; Randy Myers; Ted Durr; Dave Hammond; Jones Express Music; Keefe Commissary; The Virginia Department of Corrections; Unknown Members of the Faith Review Committee, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 11-7596.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 29, 2012.
Decided: April 3, 2012.
Jeffrey Coleman, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Jeffrey Coleman seeks to appeal the district court's orders directing him to amend his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) to comply with Rule 8(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and denying reconsideration. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The orders Coleman seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we deny Coleman's motion for appointment of counsel and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.