Case Name: Janice ADAMS, et al, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES and Board of Education, et al, Appellees; Earline CALDWELL, et al, City of St. Louis, United States and Board of Education, et al, Appellees, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, et al, Appellants; Craton LIDDELL, et al, Appellants, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al and State of Missouri, et al, Appellees; Earline CALDWELL, et al, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES and Board of Education, et al, Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1980-08-15
Citations: 693 F.2d 720
Docket Number: Nos. 80-1459, 80-1494, 80-1531 and 80-1599
Parties: Janice ADAMS, et al, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES and Board of Education, et al, Appellees. Earline CALDWELL, et al, City of St. Louis, United States and Board of Education, et al, Appellees, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, et al, Appellants. Craton LIDDELL, et al, Appellants, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al and State of Missouri, et al, Appellees. Earline CALDWELL, et al, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES and Board of Education, et al, Appellees.
Judges: Before HEANEY, ROSS and McMILLI-AN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 693
Pages: 720–721

Head Matter:
Janice ADAMS, et al, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES and Board of Education, et al, Appellees. Earline CALDWELL, et al, City of St. Louis, United States and Board of Education, et al, Appellees, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, et al, Appellants. Craton LIDDELL, et al, Appellants, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al and State of Missouri, et al, Appellees. Earline CALDWELL, et al, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES and Board of Education, et al, Appellees.
Nos. 80-1459, 80-1494, 80-1531 and 80-1599.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Aug. 15, 1980.
Before HEANEY, ROSS and McMILLI-AN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
The motion of the state defendants, Joseph P. Teasdale, Governor of Missouri, et al, for a stay of judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri pending appeal is denied. The state defendants' motion in the alternative for a stay of individual elements of the district court's order pending appeal is also denied.
The motion of appellants, Janice Adams, et al, for clarification or modification of the district court's order is denied.
The parties to this appeal may make application to the Appeals Expediter of this Court for an early setting of the appeal.