Case Name: WYANDOTTE SAVINGS BANK, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1982-01-08
Citations: 669 F.2d 386
Docket Number: No. 80-1484
Parties: WYANDOTTE SAVINGS BANK, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 669
Pages: 386–386

Head Matter:
WYANDOTTE SAVINGS BANK, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.
No. 80-1484.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Argued Dec. 15, 1981.
Decided Jan. 8, 1982.
Conrad W. Kreger, Stringari, Fritz, Kre-ger, Ahern & Hunsinger, Detroit, Mich., for petitioner.
Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel N.L.R.B., Jolane Findley, Washington, D. C. for respondent.
Before WEICK, ENGEL and MERRITT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
This bargaining unit NLRB case raises basically the same issue concerning branch banking as this Court decided in Wayne Oakland Bank v. NLRB, 462 F.2d 666 (6th Cir. 1972).
The detailed facts of the case before us are found at 250 N.L.R.B. No. 47 (July 1, 1980). Although there are minor differences, e.g., a slightly different employee transfer rate, the essential considerations of geographical proximity and minimal authority-vested in the branch managers are almost identical to those discussed in Wayne Oakland.
Accordingly, the Court finds that the bargaining units found by the Board are inappropriate and enforcement of the Board order is denied.