Case Name: Bertha Horowitz, Appellant, v. Emanuel Harris, Respondent. Chaim Gross, Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1927-04-08
Citations: 129 Misc. 236
Docket Number: 
Parties: Bertha Horowitz, Appellant, v. Emanuel Harris, Respondent. Chaim Gross, Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 129
Pages: 236–238

Head Matter:
Bertha Horowitz, Appellant, v. Emanuel Harris, Respondent. Chaim Gross, Defendant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
April 8, 1927.
Maxwell Cohen, for the plaintiff.
Emanuel Harris, in person, for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The complaint in the prior action did not allege facts warranting the imprisonment of the plaintiff's husband under body execution. (Segelken v. Meyer, 94 N. Y. 473; Lange v. Schile, 111 App. Div. 613; All-Package G. Stores Co. v. McAtamney, 174 id. 778.)
Delehanty and Lydon, JJ., concur; Levy, J., dissents, with opinion.