Case Name: BURLINGTON DISTILLING COMPANY, RESPONDENT, v. STATE BOARD OF ASSESSORS, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1915-03-01
Citations: 87 N.J.L. 315
Docket Number: 
Parties: BURLINGTON DISTILLING COMPANY, RESPONDENT, v. STATE BOARD OF ASSESSORS, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 87
Pages: 315–316

Head Matter:
BURLINGTON DISTILLING COMPANY, RESPONDENT, v. STATE BOARD OF ASSESSORS, APPELLANT.
Submitted December 5, 1914—
Decided March 1, 1915.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 86 N. J. L. 92.
For the respondent, Harrison H. Voorhees.
For the appellant, John W. Wescott, attorney-general.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Minturn in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Bergen, Kalisch, Black, White, Terhune, Williams, JJ. 7.
For reversal—The Chief Justice, Swayze, Parker, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Heppenheimer, JJ. 6.