Case Name: Jim Alabach, Plaintiff in Error, vs. The Industrial Commission et al. - (Joe Smallwood, Defendant in Error.)
Court: Illinois Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Illinois
Decision Date: 1920-02-18
Citations: 291 Ill. 338
Docket Number: No. 13102
Parties: Jim Alabach, Plaintiff in Error, vs. The Industrial Commission et al. — (Joe Smallwood, Defendant in Error.)
Judges: 
Reporter: Illinois Reports
Volume: 291
Pages: 338–339

Head Matter:
(No. 13102.
Judgment reversed.)
Jim Alabach, Plaintiff in Error, vs. The Industrial Commission et al. — (Joe Smallwood, Defendant in Error.)
Opinion filed February 18, 1920.
'Workmen’s compensation — when owner remodeling his dwelling house is not under the Compensation act. One who is merely remodeling his dwelling house is not engaged in the business of maintaining, altering or demolishing structures within the meaning of sub-section 1 of section 3 of the Compensation act, and when he engages an independent contractor to put a concrete foundation under the dwelling house he is not obliged to comply with section 31, regarding contractors’ insurance, in order to avoid liability for an injury to an employee of the contractor.
Writ oe Error to the Circuit Court of Madison county; the Hon. J. F. Gillham, Judge, presiding.
J. B. Harris, for plaintiff in error.'
W. J. Baxter, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
Mr. Justice Cartwright
delivered the opinion of the court:
On November 14, 1917, Jim Alabach, plaintiff in error, was engaged in the retail grocery business in Granite City and had entered into a verbal contract with Martin Heller ' by which Heller for a stipulated price was to furnish the material and do the work of putting a concrete foundation under the dwelling house of Alabach disconnected from his place of business and occupied by him and his family as a private residence. Joe Smallwood, defendant in error, was employed by Heller in doing the work; and on that date he suffered an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment. He applied for compensation, for his injury from Heller and Alabach. The arbitrator made an award against Heller but denied the application as' against Alabach. Upon a review by the Industrial Com mission an award was made against both Heller and Alabach, and upon a writ of certiorari from the circuit court of Madison county the award was affirmed by the circuit court. The question of the liability of Alabach is before this court on a writ of error.
No provision was made by Alabach that Heller should insure his liability to pay compensation for accidental injury to his employees, and Alabach was held liable by the Industrial Commission and the circuit court on the ground that he had failed to comply with section 31 of the Workmen's Compensation act. That section provides that anyone engaging in any business or enterprise referred to in sub-sections 1 and 2 of paragraph (b) of section 3 of the act shall be liable to pay compensation to his own immediate employees, and also to the employees of any contractor or sub-contractor, unless the contractor or sub-contractor shall have procured insurance against his liability. Section 3 defines extra-hazardous employments, and sub-section 1 brings within such employments the erection, maintaining, . removing, remodeling, altering or demolishing of any structure except as provided in sub-section 8.
Sub-section 1 of section 3, and section 31, include only persons engaged in the businesses or enterprises therein mentioned, and erection, maintaining, removing, remodeling, altering or demolishing of a dwelling house, which is neither the occupation, enterprise nor business of the owner, does not bring him within.either section. (Johnson v. Choate, 284 Ill. 214.) The enterprise o.r business in "which Alabach was engaged was the grocery business, which did not include providing a home for himself and family. Providing a place to live .and making it safe or comfortable by putting a concrete foundation under it did not render Alabach liable to pay compensation.
The judgment of the circuit court is reversed and the award set aside.
, Judgment reversed.