Case Name: CROWN PAPER LIQUIDATING TRUST, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP; et al., Defendants-Appellees; Crown Paper Liquidating Trust, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP; et al., Defendants, and Houlihan Lokey Howard & Zukin; et al., Defendants-Appellees; Crown Paper Liquidating Trust, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clifford Cutchins; et al., Defendants-Appellants, and Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP, f/k/a Coopers & Lybrand; et al., Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-08-09
Citations: 198 F. App'x 597
Docket Number: Nos. 04-16597, 05-15469, 05-15751, 05-15775
Parties: CROWN PAPER LIQUIDATING TRUST, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP; et al., Defendants—Appellees. Crown Paper Liquidating Trust, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP; et al., Defendants, and Houlihan Lokey Howard & Zukin; et al., Defendants—Appellees. Crown Paper Liquidating Trust, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Clifford Cutchins; et al., Defendants—Appellants, and Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP, f/k/a Coopers & Lybrand; et al., Defendants.
Judges: Before: T.G. NELSON, SILVERMAN, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 198
Pages: 597–599

Head Matter:
CROWN PAPER LIQUIDATING TRUST, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP; et al., Defendants—Appellees. Crown Paper Liquidating Trust, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP; et al., Defendants, and Houlihan Lokey Howard & Zukin; et al., Defendants—Appellees. Crown Paper Liquidating Trust, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Clifford Cutchins; et al., Defendants—Appellants, and Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP, f/k/a Coopers & Lybrand; et al., Defendants.
Nos. 04-16597, 05-15469, 05-15751, 05-15775.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted July 25, 2006.
Filed Aug. 9, 2006.
Allan Steyer, ESQ., Edward Egan, ESQ., Steyer Lowenthal Boodrookas Alvarez & Smith, LLP, San Francisco, CA, Leo R. Beus, ESQ., Richard R. Thomas, ESQ., Malcolm Loeb, Beus Gilbert, PLLC, Scottsdale, AZ, for Appellant.
Laurence A. Weiss, ESQ, Hilary E. Ware, ESQ., Heller Ehrman, LLP, Scott A. Fink, G. Charles Neirlich, ESQ., Sierra Brandis, ESQ., Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, LLP, Blaine Green, Bruce A. Ericson, ESQ., Pillbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, Kristin L. Myles, ESQ., Rohit K. Singla, ESQ., Munger Tolies & Olson, LLP, Benjamin Riley, ESQ., Howrey Simon, Et Al., LLP, Courtney Nguyen, ESQ., Cooley Godward, LLP, Loren Kieve, ESQ., Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP, Stephen D. Hibbard, ESQ., David P. Chiapetta, ESQ., Elizabeth Ybarra Crean, Bingham Mccutchen, LLP, Stan G. Roman, ESQ., James C. Krieg, ESQ., Krieg Keller Sloan Reilley & Roman, LLP, San Francisco, CA, Brad D. Brian, ESQ., Brooks E. Allen, ESQ., Munger Tolies & Olson, LLP, William Urquhart, ESQ., Thad A. Davis, ESQ., Scott L. Watson, ESQ., Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP, Joseph F. Coyne, ESQ., Michelle Sherman, ESQ., Sheppard Mullin, Et AL, LLP, Linda J. Smith, ESQ., James Michael Pearl, Kenyon Woolley, ESQ., O’Melveny & Myers, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, George B. Curtis, ESQ., Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Denver, CO, Kenneth A. O’brien, Jr., Edward B. Fitzpatrick, ESQ., Georgia-Pacific, Atlanta, GA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Allan Steyer, ESQ., Steyer Lowenthal Boodrookas Alvarez & Smith, LLP, San Francisco, CA, Leo R. Beus, ESQ., Malcolm Loeb, ESQ., Beus Gilbert, PLLC, Timothy J. Paris, ESQ., Steyer Lowenthal Boodrookas Alvarez & Smith LLP, Scottsdale, AZ, for Appellant.
Michael L. Rugen, ESQ., Heller Ehrman, LLP, Scott A. Fink, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, LLP, Bruce A. Ericson, ESQ., Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP, Rohit K. Singla, ESQ., Munger Tolies & Olson, LLP, Benjamin Riley, ESQ., Howrey Simon, Et Al., LLP, James C. Krieg, ESQ., Krieg Keller Sloan Reilley & Roman, LLP, David P. Chiappetta, ESQ., Bingham Mccutchen, LLP, San Francisco, CA, Brad D. Brian, ESQ., Kristin L. Myles, ESQ., Munger Tolies & Olson, LLP, A. William Urquhart, ESQ., Loren Kieve, ESQ., Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP, Joseph F. Coyne, ESQ., Michelle Sherman, ESQ., Sheppard Mullin, Et AL, LLP, Linda J. Smith, ESQ., James Michael Pearl, O’Melveny & Myers, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Kenneth A. O’brien, Jr., Edward B. Fitzpatrick, ESQ., Georgia-Pacific, Atlanta, GA, George B. Curtis, ESQ., Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Denver, CO, for Defendants-Appellees.
Allan Steyer, ESQ., Edward Egan, ESQ., Steyer Lowenthal Boodrookas Alvarez & Smith, LLP, San Francisco, CA, Leo R. Beus, ESQ., Malcolm Loeb, ESQ., Beus Gilbert, PLLC, Timothy J. Paris, ESQ., Steyer Lowenthal Boodrookas Alvarez & Smith LLP, Scottsdale, AZ, for Appellee
Michael L. Rugen, ESQ., Laurence A. Weiss, ESQ., Hilary E. Ware, ESQ., Heller Ehrman, LLP, Scott A. Fink, G. Charles Neirlich, ESQ., Sierra Brandis, ESQ., Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, LLP, Blaine Green, Bruce A. Ericson, ESQ., Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP, Rohit K. Singla, ESQ., Munger Tolies & Olson, LLP, Benjamin K. Riley, Courtney Nguyen, ESQ., Cooley Godward, LLP, Loren Kieve, ESQ., Stephen D. Hibbard, ESQ., David P. Chiapetta, ESQ., Elizabeth Ybarra Crean, Bingham Mccutchen, LLP, James C. Krieg, ESQ., Krieg Keller Sloan Reilley & Roman, LLP, San Francisco, CA, Linda J. Smith, ESQ., James Michael Pearl, Kenyon Woolley, ESQ., O’Melveny & Myers, LLP, Brad D. Brian, ESQ., Brooks E. Allen, ESQ., Kristin L. Myles, ESQ., Munger Tolies & Olson, LLP, William Urquhart, ESQ., Thad A. Davis, ESQ., Scott L. Watson, ESQ., Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP, Joseph F. Coyne, ESQ., Michelle Sherman, ESQ., Sheppard Mullin, Et AL, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Edward B. Fitzpatrick, ESQ., Georgia-Pacific, Atlanta, GA, George B. Curtis, ESQ., Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Denver, CO, for Defendants-Appellants.
Before: T.G. NELSON, SILVERMAN, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
We affirm for the reasons set forth in the well-reasoned district court orders filed on September 25, 2003, July 12, 2004, March 28, 2005 and March 30, 2005, in this consolidated appeal.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.