Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edgar Omar Keller-CANAL, aka Omar Keller-Canal, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-06-09
Citations: 578 F. App'x 630
Docket Number: No. 12-50122
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edgar Omar Keller-CANAL, aka Omar Keller-Canal, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: GOULD and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges, and KORMAN, Senior District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 578
Pages: 630–631

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edgar Omar Keller-CANAL, aka Omar Keller-Canal, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-50122.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 2, 2014.
Filed June 9, 2014.
Jean-Claude Andre, Assistant U.S., Carol Alexis Chen, Assistant U.S., Allen W. Chiu, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Kurt J. Mayer, Assistant Federal Public Defender, FPDCA-Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: GOULD and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges, and KORMAN, Senior District Judge.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
The Honorable Edward R. Korman, Senior District Judge for the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
The district court did not err in denying Keller's motion for acquittal.
I.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, there was sufficient evidence for a rational fact finder to conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that Keller was the third inmate involved in the attack. See United States v. Grasso, 724 F.3d 1077, 1085 (9th Cir.2013); United States v. Nevils, 598 F.3d 1158, 1163-65 (9th Cir.2010) (en banc). The witnesses' descriptions of Keller immediately after the incident generally matched the third inmate shown on the surveillance footage. The khaki shirt found in Keller's cell contained DNA exactly matching Officer Johnson's DNA. Surveillance footage and witness testimony showed the third inmate arrive from and retreat to the direction of Keller's cell. Lastly, witnesses agree that Keller was sweaty and non-responsive when approached in his cell soon after the altercation.
II.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, there is sufficient evidence for a rational fact finder to conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that Keller assaulted a federal officer and inflicted bodily injury. See 18 U.S.C. § 2, 111; Grasso, 724 F.3d at 1085; Nevils, 598 F.3d at 1164. Johnson testified that dur ing the altercation three inmates struck him multiple times with their fists, legs, and knees; as he was being attacked, he felt the inmates' shoes when they kicked him; and one of the inmates kicked him in the face with a shod foot. Surveillance footage and witness testimony showed three inmates attacking Johnson in unison. Finally, medical evidence demonstrated that Johnson suffered various bodily injuries, including a partially torn rotator cuff. On this evidence, a rational jury could have concluded beyond a reasonable doubt that Keller assaulted Johnson and inflicted bodily injury.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.