Case Name: CLARE v. MARONEY et ux.
Court: Texas Courts of Civil Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1940-10-14
Citations: 144 S.W.2d 300
Docket Number: No. 5298
Parties: CLARE v. MARONEY et ux.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 144
Pages: 300–300

Head Matter:
CLARE v. MARONEY et ux.
No. 5298.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Amarillo.
Oct. 14, 1940.
Joe S. Moss and T. L. Price, both of Post, for appellant
R. L. Graves, of Brownfield, for appel-lees.

Opinion:
FOLLEY, Justice.
Appellees have filed a motion to advance the submission of this cause by virtue of the provisions of article 4662, R.C.S. of 1925, asserting that the appeal is from the dissolution of an interlocutory order.
The motion must be denied because it appears that the judgment appealed from is one upon the merits embracing only incidentally the dissolution of the interlocutory order. Such an appeal is not within the contemplation of article 4662 providing for the advancement of appeals. McAllen and Harlingen Local No. 688 v. Publix Theatres Corporation, Tex.Civ.App., 51 S.W.2d 1090; Early-Foster Co. v. Mid-Tex Mills et al., Tex.Civ.App., 232 S.W. 1117; Commissioners' Court of Henderson County v. Burk, Tex.Civ.App., 255 S.W. 793.
The motion is overruled.