Case Name: Frederick J. Ostrow, Respondent, v. Raysec Corporation, Appellant, and Roy E. Thompson, Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1930-11
Citations: 231 A.D. 755
Docket Number: Appeal No. 2
Parties: Frederick J. Ostrow, Respondent, v. Raysec Corporation, Appellant, and Roy E. Thompson, Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 231
Pages: 755–755

Head Matter:
Frederick J. Ostrow, Respondent, v. Raysec Corporation, Appellant, and Roy E. Thompson, Defendant.
(Appeal No. 2.)

Opinion:
Order denying motion of defendant Raysec Corporation for a new trial upon the ground of newly-discovered evidence reversed upon the law and the facts and motion granted, with costs to abide the event. We are of opinion that a new trial should be had in the interests of substantial justice. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur.