Case Name: Herbert Rogers, Appellant, v. The City of Rome, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1906-12-21
Citations: 186 N.Y. 610
Docket Number: 
Parties: Herbert Rogers, Appellant, v. The City of Rome, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 186
Pages: 610–610

Head Matter:
Herbert Rogers, Appellant, v. The City of Rome, Respondent.
Rogers v. City of Borne, 108 App. Div. 358, affirmed.
(Argued November 23, 1906;
decided December 21, 1906.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered November 13, 1905, which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial, and granted a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been received through defendant’s negligence.
Howard G. Wiggins for appellant.
M. J. Larhin for respondent.

Opinion:
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellant on the stipulation, with costs in all courts; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner and Willard Bartlett, JJ. Not sitting: Hiscook, J.