Case Name: Lloyd DOTSON-BEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-11-21
Citations: 205 S.W.3d 891
Docket Number: No. WD 66057
Parties: Lloyd DOTSON-BEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before HOWARD, C.J., and BRECKENRIDGE and NEWTON, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 205
Pages: 891–892

Head Matter:
Lloyd DOTSON-BEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 66057.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Nov. 21, 2006.
Susan L. Hogan, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, MO, attorney for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Karen L. Kramer, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, attorneys for respondent.
Before HOWARD, C.J., and BRECKENRIDGE and NEWTON, JJ.

Opinion:
Order
PER CURIAM.
Lloyd Dotson-Bey appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. The motion court's findings and conclusions that Dotson-Bey's appellate counsel was not ineffective are not clearly erroneous. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
The motion court's judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).