Case Name: Consolidated Fisheries Company, Respondent, v. Brown-Allen Chemicals, Inc., Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1953-07-14
Citations: 305 N.Y. 851
Docket Number: 
Parties: Consolidated Fisheries Company, Respondent, v. Brown-Allen Chemicals, Inc., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 305
Pages: 851–853

Head Matter:
Consolidated Fisheries Company, Respondent, v. Brown-Allen Chemicals, Inc., Appellant.
Argued May 22, 1953;
decided July 14, 1953.
Lemuel Skidmore and lioivard F. Ordman for appellant.
Lionel S. Popldn and Burton 1. Monasch for respondent.

Opinion:
Orders affirmed, with costs. First question certified answered in the affirmative. Second question certified answered in the negative. "We do not pass upon the issue as to whether appellant was prejudiced "because it may have bought the fish oil for resale for the reason that that issue is not raised by the pleadings. No opinion.
Concur; Lewis, Ch. J,, Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Froessel, JJ. Taking no part: Van Voorhis. J.