Case Name: Zainab KAMARA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Mary Lou McDonough; Abu Kalokoh; Meskerem Asresahegn, MD; David Ijeh, MD; Adedeji Adewunmi; Diamon Baker; Shayla Stewart; Yvette Ford; Dawn Taylor; Lt. Col. Harry L. Hilton, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-04-28
Citations: 687 F. App'x 296
Docket Number: No. 17-6292
Parties: Zainab KAMARA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Mary Lou McDonough; Abu Kalokoh; Meskerem Asresahegn, MD; David Ijeh, MD; Adedeji Adewunmi; Diamon Baker; Shayla Stewart; Yvette Ford; Dawn Taylor; Lt. Col. Harry L. Hilton, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 687
Pages: 296–297

Head Matter:
Zainab KAMARA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Mary Lou McDonough; Abu Kalokoh; Meskerem Asresahegn, MD; David Ijeh, MD; Adedeji Adewunmi; Diamon Baker; Shayla Stewart; Yvette Ford; Dawn Taylor; Lt. Col. Harry L. Hilton, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 17-6292
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 25, 2017
Decided: April 28, 2017
Zainab Kamara, Appellant Pro Se.
Gessesse Teferi, Erin Nicole Williams, PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Upper Marlboro, Maryland; Michelle Jacquelyn Marzullo, MARKS, O’NEILL, O’BRIEN, DOHERTY & KELLY, P.C., Towson, Maryland, for Ap-pellees.
Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Zainab Kamara appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to the Defendants on Kamara's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Kamara's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, Kamara has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we deny Ka- mara's motion to appoint counsel and affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED