Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John M. Dunn and Daniel Gentile, alias Danny Brooks, Appellants
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1949-03-04
Citations: 298 N.Y. 929
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John M. Dunn and Daniel Gentile, alias Danny Brooks, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 298
Pages: 929–929

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John M. Dunn and Daniel Gentile, alias Danny Brooks, Appellants.
Submitted March 4, 1949;
decided March 4, 1949.

Opinion:
Application to amend remittitur granted. Recall of remittitur requested and when returned it will he amended by adding thereto the following: " Upon this appeal there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: The defendants argued that the denial of the motion for a new trial deprived them of due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. This court held that the denial of the motion did not violate any rights guaranteed to the defendants by said provision of the United States Constitution." [See 298 N. Y. 865.]