Case Name: In the Matter of the Compensation of Carole A. Vanlanen, Claimant. SAIF CORPORATION and Belozer Farms, Petitioners, v. Carole A. VANLANEN, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1993-06-02
Citations: 120 Or. App. 613
Docket Number: 91-13600; CA A76539
Parties: In the Matter of the Compensation of Carole A. Vanlanen, Claimant. SAIF CORPORATION and Belozer Farms, Petitioners, v. Carole A. VANLANEN, Respondent.
Judges: Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Durham, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 120
Pages: 613–614

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted April 21,
reversed and remanded for reconsideration June 2, 1993
In the Matter of the Compensation of Carole A. Vanlanen, Claimant. SAIF CORPORATION and Belozer Farms, Petitioners, v. Carole A. VANLANEN, Respondent.
(91-13600; CA A76539)
852 P2d 281
Michael O. Whitty, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Julie K. Bolt, Special Assistant Attorney General, Salem.
Steven T. Fagenstrom, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Galton, Scott & Colett, Portland.
Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Durham, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board holding that its request for review of a May 3, 1991, decision of the referee did not stay payment of benefits subsequently awarded by an August 15, 1991, determination order. We conclude that, under ORS 656.313, employer's May 23, 1991, appeal of the referee's order on compensability did stay payment of benefits awarded by the later determination order. Diamond Fruit Growers v. Goss, 120 Or App 390, 852 P2d 915 (1993). Therefore, we reverse the Board's order.
Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.