Case Name: In the Matter of the Compensation of Charles W. Tedrow, Claimant. STONE CONTAINER OF NV, Petitioner, v. Charles W. TEDROW, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1993-06-09
Citations: 121 Or. App. 95
Docket Number: WCB 91-09918; CA A76702
Parties: In the Matter of the Compensation of Charles W. Tedrow, Claimant. STONE CONTAINER OF NV, Petitioner, v. Charles W. TEDROW, Respondent.
Judges: Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Landau, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 121
Pages: 95–96

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted May 3,
affirmed June 9,
reconsideration denied August 11,
petition for review denied September 21, 1993 (317 Or 584)
In the Matter of the Compensation of Charles W. Tedrow, Claimant. STONE CONTAINER OF NV, Petitioner, v. Charles W. TEDROW, Respondent.
(WCB 91-09918; CA A76702)
853 P2d 1329
A. E. Bud Bailey, Tualatin, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Bailey & Associates, Tualatin.
No appearance by respondent.
Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Landau, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board that requires it to pay for medical treatment of claimant's low back condition. We affirm.
The Board found that the condition, a herniated disc at L5-S1, for which claimant sought medical treatment, was a different condition from a back condition that employer had denied in 1990. There is substantial evidence to support that finding, and the Board did not err by holding that claim compensable.
The Board ordered that employer pay for medical treatment beginning on the date of the denial. Although it made no findings about when claimant's need for treatment relating to the L5-S1 condition began, we read the Board's order as requiring payment only for medical treatment related to the changed condition.
Affirmed.