Case Name: Frederick J. WOLFE and Heather B. Wolfe, his wife, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. E.F. HUTTON & COMPANY, INC., and Peter Panos, Defendants-Appellants; Joseph GORMAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER AND SMITH, INC., a foreign corporation, Defendant-Appellant, Micah Hollander, Michael Strauss, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1986-02-28
Citations: 784 F.2d 1061
Docket Number: Nos. 85-3352, 85-5419
Parties: Frederick J. WOLFE and Heather B. Wolfe, his wife, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. E.F. HUTTON & COMPANY, INC., and Peter Panos, Defendants-Appellants. Joseph GORMAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER AND SMITH, INC., a foreign corporation, Defendant-Appellant, Micah Hollander, Michael Strauss, Defendants.
Judges: Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, RONEY, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, and CLARK, Circuit Judges .
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 784
Pages: 1061–1061

Head Matter:
Frederick J. WOLFE and Heather B. Wolfe, his wife, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. E.F. HUTTON & COMPANY, INC., and Peter Panos, Defendants-Appellants. Joseph GORMAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER AND SMITH, INC., a foreign corporation, Defendant-Appellant, Micah Hollander, Michael Strauss, Defendants.
Nos. 85-3352, 85-5419.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Feb. 28, 1986.
Keith Olin, Bennett Falk, Ruden Barnett McClosky Schuster & Russell P.A., Miami, Fla., for defendants-appellants.
Elmo R. Hoffman, Orlando, Fla., for Wolfe.
Karen A. Gievers, Anderson Moss Russo Gievers & Cohen, P.A., Miami, Fla., for Gorman.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, RONEY, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, and CLARK, Circuit Judges .
Judge Anderson is disqualified and did not participate in this decision.

Opinion:
BY THE COURT:
A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by this Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.