Case Name: Yolanda DIAZ, Appellant, v. Pedro HERNANDEZ and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1978-06-27
Citations: 360 So. 2d 58
Docket Number: No. 77-1168
Parties: Yolanda DIAZ, Appellant, v. Pedro HERNANDEZ and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Appellees.
Judges: Before PEARSON, HUBBART and KE-HOE, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 360
Pages: 58–58

Head Matter:
Yolanda DIAZ, Appellant, v. Pedro HERNANDEZ and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Appellees.
No. 77-1168.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
June 27, 1978.
A. Koss and Gary D. Malfeld, Coral Gables, for appellant.
Talburt, Kubicki & Bradley and Betsy E. Hartley, Miami, for appellees.
Before PEARSON, HUBBART and KE-HOE, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The only substantial question presented on this appeal is whether the trial court properly applied the test set forth in Marshall v. Papineau, 132 So.2d 786 (Fla. 1st DCA 1961); and Reeder v. Edward M. Chadbourne, Inc., 338 So.2d 271 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976), in excluding the testimony of an expert witness. Our review of the record shows no error.
Affirmed.