Case Name: FEED McCORMACK, Appellant, v. STATE, Respondent
Court: Arizona Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Arizona
Decision Date: 1934-06-05
Citations: 43 Ariz. 555
Docket Number: Criminal No. 804
Parties: FEED McCORMACK, Appellant, v. STATE, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Arizona Reports
Volume: 43
Pages: 555–556

Head Matter:
[Criminal No. 804.
Filed June 5, 1934.]
[33 Pac. (2d) 282.]
FEED McCORMACK, Appellant, v. STATE, Respondent.
Mr. H. L. Russell and Mr. F. M. Gold, for Appellant.
Mr. Arthur T. La Prade, Attorney General, Mr. John Francis Connor, Assistant Attorney General, and Mr. H. K. Mangum, County Attorney, for the State.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is a companion case to DeMille v. State, ante, p. 551, 33 Pac. (2d) 280, just decided. The information in the two cases was joint, but a severance was demanded and granted, and the defendants were tried separately. The cases involve the same transaction, and the assignments of error are identical.
For the reasons stated in the DeMille case, we have considered only the assignment that the verdict was contrary to the evidence and have examined the record for fundamental error. We have read the transcript of evidence, and there is ample testimony therein to sustain the verdict of the jury. The record on its face shows that the defendant was tried, convicted, and sentenced according to law, and the judgment is therefore affirmed.