Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Roy Lee HILL, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1976-09-24
Citations: 540 F.2d 1254
Docket Number: No. 74-2087
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Roy Lee HILL, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 540
Pages: 1254–1254

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Roy Lee HILL, Appellant.
No. 74-2087.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Argued Aug. 27, 1976.
Decided Sept. 24, 1976.
Michael D. Toobin, Alexandria, Va. (Barry R. Poretz, Lainof & Cohen, Alexandria, Va., on brief), for appellant.
J. Frederick Sinclair, Asst. U. S. Atty. (William B. Cummings, U. S. Atty., Alexandria, Va., on brief), for appellee.
Before CRAVEN and BUTZNER, Circuit Judges, and FIELD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This appeal presents the single question of the competency of trial counsel. We discern from the record no errors of judgment to support the allegation and affirm the judgment below.
During oral argument appellate counsel suggested to us matters outside the record that can best be developed, if true, in a proceeding below pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Our decision herein is without prejudice to the right of the appellant to seek collateral relief under § 2255.
AFFIRMED.