Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MATTHEW SCOTT CARLSON, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1992-09-16
Citations: 115 Or. App. 297
Docket Number: 90-1809; CA A69283
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MATTHEW SCOTT CARLSON, Appellant.
Judges: Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Rossman and De Muniz, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 115
Pages: 297–297

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted July 10,
affirmed September 16, 1992
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MATTHEW SCOTT CARLSON, Appellant.
(90-1809; CA A69283)
836 P2d 1378
Richard L. Wolf, Oregon City, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.
Thomas H. Denney, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.
Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Rossman and De Muniz, Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Affirmed. State v. Lazaro, 113 Or App 330, 832 P2d 1259 (1992).