Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos MATA GALVEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-08-04
Citations: 143 F. App'x 765
Docket Number: No. 04-50131
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Carlos MATA GALVEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CALLAHAN and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 143
Pages: 765–767

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Carlos MATA GALVEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 04-50131.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 1, 2005.
Decided Aug. 4, 2005.
As Amended on Denial of Rehearing Oct. 21, 2005.
Daniel N. Shallman, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Phillip A. Trevino, Esq., Law Offices of Phillip A. Trevino, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CALLAHAN and BEA, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suit able for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Carlos Mata Galvez appeals his conviction and 21-month sentence imposed following a guilty plea to conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and fraud and misuse of entry documents, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1546.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Galvez has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Galvez has not filed a pro se supplemental brief. The government has not filed an answering brief.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.