Case Name: Cartersville Grocery Co. v. Elk Manufacturing & Commission Co.
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1923-03-06
Citations: 30 Ga. App. 4
Docket Number: 13941
Parties: Cartersville Grocery Co. v. Elk Manufacturing & Commission Co.
Judges: Broyles, G. J., concurs. Luke, J., dissents.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 30
Pages: 4–4

Head Matter:
13941.
Cartersville Grocery Co. v. Elk Manufacturing & Commission Co.
Decided March 6, 1923.
Rehearing denied April 11, 1923.
Attachment; from city court of Cartersville — Judge Townsend. July 22, 1922.
Willingham, Wright & Covington, J. B. Whiialcer, for plaintiff in error.
Neel & Neel, contra.

Opinion:
Bloodworth, J.
When the entire charge is considered in the light of all the facts of the case, there is nothing in any of the grounds of the motion for a new trial, based upon alleged errors in the charge of the court, or in the refusal to charge, that requires the grant of a new trial; for no reason assigned in the other grounds of the motion is a new trial demanded, and,,as there is evidence to support the finding of the jury, the judgment is
Affirmed.
Broyles, G. J., concurs. Luke, J., dissents.