Case Name: David Lee CURRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-11-06
Citations: 568 So. 2d 1346
Docket Number: No. 90-2392
Parties: David Lee CURRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SHIVERS, C.J., and SMITH and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 568
Pages: 1346–1346

Head Matter:
David Lee CURRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 90-2392.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nov. 6, 1990.
David Davis, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Jim Rogers, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Cobb v. State, 567 So.2d 554 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Huff v. State, 566 So.2d 945 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Fla.R.App.P. 9.315(a). We certify the following question to the supreme court as one of great public importance:
DOES A JEOPARDY VIOLATION RESULT FROM THE IMPOSITION OF A PROBATIONARY SPLIT SENTENCE WHEN THE LEGISLATURE HAS NOT EXPLICITLY AUTHORIZED THAT DISPOSITION IN THE SENTENCING ALTERNATIVES FOR § 921.087, FLA. STAT.?
SHIVERS, C.J., and SMITH and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.