Case Name: FERDINAND GLENN HIGH, Appellant, v. STATE OF NEVADA, DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, and HOWARD HILL, Director of Department of Motor Vehicles, Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada
Jurisdiction: Nevada
Decision Date: 1977-06-15
Citations: 93 Nev. 305
Docket Number: No. 8807
Parties: FERDINAND GLENN HIGH, Appellant, v. STATE OF NEVADA, DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, and HOWARD HILL, Director of Department of Motor Vehicles, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Nevada Reports
Volume: 93
Pages: 305–307

Head Matter:
FERDINAND GLENN HIGH, Appellant, v. STATE OF NEVADA, DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, and HOWARD HILL, Director of Department of Motor Vehicles, Respondents.
No. 8807
June 15, 1977
565 P.2d 329
Guild, Hagen & Clark, Reno, for Appellant.
Robert List, Attorney General; Cathy Valenta-Weise, Deputy Attorney General, Carson City, for Respondents.

Opinion:
OPINION
Per Curiam:
Appellant sought the renewal of his driver's license, but failed to pass the eye test required by NRS 483.380(1 ). Despite this deficiency, appellant requested that respondents give him a driving test. After a hearing on the matter, respondents refused his request, and the district court affirmed respondents' decision. Here, appellant contends respondents' refusal to test his ability to drive is arbitrary, capricious, and an abuse of discretion. We disagree.
The function of this court in reviewing the decision of an administrative agency is to "ascertain whether that body acted arbitrarily or capriciously and, therefore, abused its discretion." Bd. Chiropractic Exam'rs v. Babtkis, 83 Nev. 385, 387, 432 P.2d 498, 499 (1967). Even if the driving test was administered, respondents would be precluded by statute from issuing appellant a license due to his failure to pass the necessary eye examination. NRS 483.250(6). Under such circumstances, respondents did not abuse their discretion by refusing appellant's request.
Affirmed.
NRS 483.380(1) provides in pertinent parts:
"1. . . . Every license shall be renewable on or during a 90-day period before its expiration upon application and payment of the required fee, and . . . each applicant for renewal shall appear before a driver's license examiner and successfully pass a test of his eyesight. . . ."
NRS 483.250(6) provides:
"The department shall not issue any license under the provisions of NRS 483.010 to 483.630, inclusive:
"6. To any person who is required by NRS 483.010 to 483.630, inclusive, to take an examination, unless such person has successfully passed such examination."