Case Name: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. NATHANIEL CUTLER, Jr., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1882-12
Citations: 35 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 465
Docket Number: 
Parties: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. NATHANIEL CUTLER, Jr., Appellant.
Judges: Present — Barnard, P. J., Gilbert and Dykman JJ.
Reporter: Supreme Court Reports (Hun)
Volume: 35
Pages: 465–466

Head Matter:
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. NATHANIEL CUTLER, Jr., Appellant.
Disorderly p&rsons and, gamesters — who a/re — Codie of Criminal Procedure, see. 899.
The defendant kept a public saloon, to which persóns resorted for the purpose of playing pool and bagatelle. In some cases the losers were, by the terms of the game, to pay for the use of the apparatus, and in others for the drinks:
Meld,, that the house was a public nuisance at common law, and that persons who resorted to it were gamesters within the meaning of subdivisions 4 and 7 of section 899 of the Oode of Civil Procedure.-
Appeal from a judgment of the Court of Sessions of Westchester county, affirming a judgment of a Court of Special Sessions adjudging the defendant to be a disorderly person and requiring him to enter into a bond, with sureties, for $250.
A. J. Adams, for the appellant.
Nelson H. Baiter, district-attorney, for the people.

Opinion:
Gilbert, J.:
With respect to the technical objections to the judgment appealed from, it will be sufficient to refer to section 764 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Upon the merits we think the evidence is suf ficient to sustain the conviction. The statute (Code Grim. Proc., § 899, subd. 4 and T) defines disorderly persons; and among the persons so defined, are keepers of houses for the resort of gamesters, and persons who keep in a public place an apparatus or device for the purpose of gaming. The evidence shows that the defendant kept a public saloon, to which persons resorted for the purpose of playing a game called pool, and another game called bagatelle.
These games were sometimes played upon the terms that the loser of the game should pay for the use of the gaming apparatus; but at other times the players played for drinks. The house of the defendant, as appears, was kept principally for those purposes. Such a house is a public nuisance at common law (Tanner v. The Trustees of Albion, 5 Hill, 121), and persons who resort there are gamesters within the definition of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
In Hitchins v. The People (39 N. Y., 456), the Court-of Appeals held that playing games for beer or cigars, was gambling within the meaning of chapter 504 of the Laws of 1851, which prohibited the keeping of a room, etc., to be used for gambling.
That case is in accordance with general principles for the promotion of the public welfare, and is decisive of this case.
The conviction must be affirmed.
Present — Barnard, P. J., Gilbert and Dykman JJ.
Conviction and judgment.affirmed.