Case Name: In the Matter of Daniel Mitchell, a Child. STATE ex rel JUVENILE DEPARTMENT OF MULTNOMAH COUNTY, Respondent on Review, v. Daniel MITCHELL, Petitioner on Review
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1997-07-18
Citations: 325 Or. 479
Docket Number: CC 9201-80221; CA A78788; SC S41701
Parties: In the Matter of Daniel Mitchell, a Child. STATE ex rel JUVENILE DEPARTMENT OF MULTNOMAH COUNTY, Respondent on Review, v. Daniel MITCHELL, Petitioner on Review.
Judges: Before Carson, Chief Justice, Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Fadeley, Graber, and Durham, Justices.
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 325
Pages: 479–479

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted March 7,1995,
decision of the Court of Appeals and order of the juvenile court affirmed by an equally divided court July 18, 1997
In the Matter of Daniel Mitchell, a Child. STATE ex rel JUVENILE DEPARTMENT OF MULTNOMAH COUNTY, Respondent on Review, v. Daniel MITCHELL, Petitioner on Review.
(CC 9201-80221; CA A78788; SC S41701)
940 P2d 518
Julie H. McFarlane, Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner on review.
Janet A. Klapstein, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent on review. With her on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.
Jenny Cooke, Portland, filed a brief for amicus curiae Oregon Criminal Defense Lawyers Association.
Before Carson, Chief Justice, Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Fadeley, Graber, and Durham, Justices.
Unis, J., retired June 30,1996, and did not participate in this decision.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The decision of the Court of Appeals and the order of the juvenile court are affirmed by an equally divided court.