Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Angel Ramon BARRAZA-ARBALLO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-10-01
Citations: 249 F. App'x 631
Docket Number: No. 05-50772
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Angel Ramon BARRAZA-ARBALLO, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 249
Pages: 631–632

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Angel Ramon BARRAZA-ARBALLO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-50772.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 24, 2007 .
Filed Oct. 1, 2007.
Jill Feeney, Becky S. Walker, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee.
Sung Bae Park, Esq., Van Nuys, CA, Michael Tanaka, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Angel Ramon Barraza-Arballo appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 46-month sentence imposed for being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1826.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Barraza-Arballo has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se or government brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment.
In accordance with United States v. Rivera-Sanchez, 222 F.3d 1057, 1062 (9th Cir. 2000), we remand the case to the district court with instructions that it delete from the judgment.the incorrect reference to § 1326(b)(2). See United States v. Herrera-Blanco, 232 F.3d 715, 719 (9th Cir. 2000) (remanding sua sponte to delete the reference to § 1326(b)).
We grant counsel's motion to withdraw. The motion for substitution of counsel, filed on December 26, 2006, by counsel for appellant, is denied as moot.
AFFIRMED; REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.