Case Name: KATIE N. STEPHENS et al., Respondents, v. THE LEMOORE CANAL & IRRIGATION COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant; EMMA E. McKENNA, Executrix of the Last Will of Richard E. McKenna, Deceased, Intervener and Respondent
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1913-08-16
Citations: 22 Cal. App. 809
Docket Number: Civ. No. 1125
Parties: KATIE N. STEPHENS et al., Respondents, v. THE LEMOORE CANAL & IRRIGATION COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant; EMMA E. McKENNA, Executrix of the Last Will of Richard E. McKenna, Deceased, Intervener and Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports
Volume: 22
Pages: 809–809

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 1125.
Third Appellate District.
August 16, 1913.]
KATIE N. STEPHENS et al., Respondents, v. THE LEMOORE CANAL & IRRIGATION COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant; EMMA E. McKENNA, Executrix of the Last Will of Richard E. McKenna, Deceased, Intervener and Respondent.
Corporation—Sale op Stock por Delinquent Assessments.—Judgment and order affirmed on the authority of Stephens v. Lemoore Canal Irrigation Co., ante, p. 579.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kings County and from an order refusing a new trial. John G. Covert, Judge.
Houghton & Houghton, for Appellant.
Miles Wallace, and E. T. Cosper, for Respondents.
M. L. Short, and H. Scott Jacobs, for Intervener and Respondent.

Opinion:
CHIPMAN, P. J.
This appeal is by the defendant company and was referred to in our opinion in the same case No. 1113, Stephens v. Lemoore Land & Irrigation Co., ante, p. 579, [135 Pac. 707], this day decided. The questions here presented are the same as were considered and decided in No. 1113 and, for the reason there given, the judgment and order are affirmed.
Burnett, J., and Hart, J., concurred.