Case Name: KLEIN, Respondent, v. BROOKLYN MAJESTIC THEATRE CO., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1912-02-23
Citations: 133 N.Y.S. 1129
Docket Number: 
Parties: KLEIN, Respondent, v. BROOKLYN MAJESTIC THEATRE CO., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 133
Pages: 1129–1129

Head Matter:
KLEIN, Respondent, v. BROOKLYN MAJESTIC THEATRE CO., Appellant.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
February 23, 1912.)
Action by Marie Klein against the Brooklyn Majestic Theatre Company. (Appeal No. 1.)

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with costs. We think that the order for the second examination should stand. It appears possible that the same cause required the amputation of both breasts, and, if so, the plaintiff could not attribute the injury to the right breast, for which she seeks damages, to the negligence, or wholly to the negligence, of the defendant, complained of in this action. Defendant is not chargeable with shortcomings in the matter, and the facts shown justified the Special Term in granting the second order, which is properly limited in its scope. See Dambmann v. Butter-field, 15 Hun, 495. See, also, 132 N. Y. Supp. 1134.