Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Horacio AYON-ENCINAS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-03-17
Citations: 58 F. App'x 743
Docket Number: No. 02-10226; D.C. No. CR-01-00153-ECR
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Horacio AYON-ENCINAS, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 58
Pages: 743–743

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Horacio AYON-ENCINAS, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 02-10226.
D.C. No. CR-01-00153-ECR.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 10, 2003.
Decided March 17, 2003.
Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Horacio Ayon-Encinas appeals his conviction pursuant to guilty plea and his 56-month sentence for unlawful reentry by a deported, removed and/or excluded alien in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.
Ayon-Encinas contends that he cannot be subjected to a sentencing enhancement under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) because that statute only applies to aliens who have been removed, and not to aliens who have been deported or excluded, as Ayon-Encinas was. This contention lacks merit because we have held that there is no legally significant distinction between "deportation" and "removal" for purposes of the crime defined by 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and the enhancement under section 1326(b). See United States v. Lopez-Gonzalez, 183 F.3d 933, 934-35 (9th Cir.1999).
Ayon-Encinas also contends that the district court violated his rights under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000) because 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) describes a separate crime from subsection (a), and must be pled in the indictment. As he acknowledges, this issue has been foreclosed by United States v. Arellano-Rivera, 244 F.3d 1119, 1127 (9th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 976, 122 S.Ct. 1450, 152 L.Ed.2d 392 (2002); United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411, 414-15 (9th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 966, 121 S.Ct. 1503, 149 L.Ed.2d 388 (2001).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.