Case Name: Rosemary Arrin REYNOLDS, Appellant, v. Arthur W. TIFFORD, and Leon G. Nichols, Trustee, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1987-04-28
Citations: 506 So. 2d 55
Docket Number: No. 86-783
Parties: Rosemary Arrin REYNOLDS, Appellant, v. Arthur W. TIFFORD, and Leon G. Nichols, Trustee, Appellees.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HENDRY and FERGUSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 506
Pages: 55–55

Head Matter:
Rosemary Arrin REYNOLDS, Appellant, v. Arthur W. TIFFORD, and Leon G. Nichols, Trustee, Appellees.
No. 86-783.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 28, 1987.
Max P. Engel and Louis Stoskopf, Miami, for appellant.
Arthur W. Tifford, Miami, in pro. per.
Wallace, Engels & Pertnoy and Sidney M. Pertnoy, Miami, for appellee Nichols, Trustee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HENDRY and FERGUSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By this appeal appellant challenges several orders entered by the trial court subsequent to a final summary judgment of foreclosure.
The several grounds relied upon by appellant for reversal have been considered in the light of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel, and we find that no reversible error has been shown. The record reflects that the cause was fully and fairly tried, that the orders appealed are fully supported by the evidence, and that the several rulings of the trial court challenged by appellant did not, on the record and under the law, constitute harmful error. Therefore the orders appealed are affirmed.
Affirmed.