Case Name: Jody WOLFF, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Christiane WIBRACHT, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-05-23
Citations: 192 S.W.3d 506
Docket Number: No. ED 86768
Parties: Jody WOLFF, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Christiane WIBRACHT, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before MARY K HOFF, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 192
Pages: 506–506

Head Matter:
Jody WOLFF, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Christiane WIBRACHT, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 86768.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
May 23, 2006.
Joel D. Monson, Jon R. Sanner, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Michael A. Gross, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before MARY K HOFF, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Christiane Wibracht ('Wibracht") appeals the judgment of the trial court in favor of Jody Wolff ("Wolff') on her claim of negligent misrepresentation. Wibracht claims the trial court erred in granting judgment in favor of Wolff because there was insufficient evidence to support such a judgment. Wibracht also claims the court erred in awarding Wolff attorneys' fees and costs pursuant to language contained in a sales contract between the parties.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).