Case Name: SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. DIZDAR BROTHERS SEWER & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-11-22
Citations: 177 S.W.3d 857
Docket Number: No. ED 85606
Parties: SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. DIZDAR BROTHERS SEWER & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J„ and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 177
Pages: 857–857

Head Matter:
SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. DIZDAR BROTHERS SEWER & CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 85606.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Nov. 22, 2005.
Suzanne L. Montgomery, Nancy E. Em-mel, Sindel & Emmel, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Thomas A. Connelly, Thomas A. Connelly, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J„ and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a judgment in plaintiffs favor for damage to an underground telephone cable. The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a written memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).