Case Name: Jerilyn QUON; April Florio; Jeff Quon; Steve Trujillo, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ARCH WIRELESS OPERATING COMPANY, INCORPORATED, a Delaware corporation; City of Ontario, a municipal corporation; Lloyd Scharf, individually and as Chief of Ontario Police Department; Ontario Police Department; Debbie Glenn, individually and as a Sergeant of Ontario Police Department, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-01-27
Citations: 554 F.3d 769
Docket Number: No. 07-55282
Parties: Jerilyn QUON; April Florio; Jeff Quon; Steve Trujillo, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ARCH WIRELESS OPERATING COMPANY, INCORPORATED, a Delaware corporation; City of Ontario, a municipal corporation; Lloyd Scharf, individually and as Chief of Ontario Police Department; Ontario Police Department; Debbie Glenn, individually and as a Sergeant of Ontario Police Department, Defendants-Appel-lees.
Judges: Before: HARRY PREGERSON and KIM McLANE WARDLAW, Circuit Judges, and RONALD B. LEIGHTON, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 554
Pages: 769–779

Head Matter:
Jerilyn QUON; April Florio; Jeff Quon; Steve Trujillo, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ARCH WIRELESS OPERATING COMPANY, INCORPORATED, a Delaware corporation; City of Ontario, a municipal corporation; Lloyd Scharf, individually and as Chief of Ontario Police Department; Ontario Police Department; Debbie Glenn, individually and as a Sergeant of Ontario Police Department, Defendants-Appel-lees.
No. 07-55282.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Jan. 27, 2009.
Zahra Khoury, Esquire, Michael A. McGill, Esquire, Lackie & Dammeier APC, Upland, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
Barry J. Blonien, Matthew A. Brill, Esquire, Partner, Latham & Watkins, LLP, Washington, DC, Kent J. Bullard, Greines Martin Stein & Richland, LLP, Los Ange-les, CA, Dimitrios C. Rinos, Esquire, Rinos & Martin, Tustin, CA, Bruce E. Disen-house, Kinkle Rodiger & Spriggs, Riverside, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: HARRY PREGERSON and KIM McLANE WARDLAW, Circuit Judges, and RONALD B. LEIGHTON, District Judge.
The Honorable Ronald B. Leighton, United States District Judge for the Western District of Washington, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
Order; Concurrence by Judge WARDLAW; Dissent by Judge IKUTA.
ORDER
Judges Pregerson, Wardlaw, and Leigh-ton voted to deny Appellees' petition for panel rehearing. Judges Pregerson and Wardlaw also voted to deny Appellees' petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Leighton so recommended.
The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc reconsideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35. Judge Bybee was re-cused.
The petition for rehearing en banc is denied.