Case Name: Tony PEROULIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paul KOZAK, aka Zachary Apollo Kriston, aka Zachary King, Defendant-Appellant, and Kings County Command Corporation; et al., Defendants, Diana Fesko, Real-party-in-interest
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-05-13
Citations: 378 F. App'x 769
Docket Number: No. 08-16615
Parties: Tony PEROULIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paul KOZAK, aka Zachary Apollo Kriston, aka Zachary King, Defendant-Appellant, and Kings County Command Corporation; et al., Defendants, Diana Fesko, Real-party-in-interest.
Judges: Before: BEEZER, TROTT and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 378
Pages: 769–769

Head Matter:
Tony PEROULIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paul KOZAK, aka Zachary Apollo Kriston, aka Zachary King, Defendant-Appellant, and Kings County Command Corporation; et al., Defendants, Diana Fesko, Real-party-in-interest.
No. 08-16615.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 13, 2010.
Mark Connot, Esquire, E. Robert Spear, Esquire, Hutchison & Steffen, LLC, Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Zachary Kriston, Las Vegas, NV, pro se.
Brent D. Percival, Law Offices, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendants.
Adam S. Davis, Moran Law Firm, LLC, Las Vegas, NV, for Real-party-in-interest.
D.C. No. 2:07-cv-00284-JCMGWF, District of Nevada, Las Vegas.
Before: BEEZER, TROTT and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
The panel has voted to grant Appellant Paul Kozak, aka Zachary Apollo Kriston's petition for panel rehearing. The Memorandum filed January 19, 2010, is withdrawn.
Upon review of the record and the briefing in this appeal, this court has determined that the appointment of pro bono counsel would benefit this court's review. This court by this order expresses no opinion as to the merits of this appeal. The clerk shall enter an order appointing pro bono counsel to represent Appellant Kri-ston for purposes of this appeal only and establishing a supplemental briefing schedule. The appeal is stayed pending further order of this court.
If Appellant Kriston objects to the court's appointment of counsel in this appeal, he shall file a written objection within 14 days from the date of entry of this order.