Case Name: Mauricio E. WEBER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Corporal SANTOS, Defendant-Appellee, and Captain Arlette Jones; Lieutenant Hankins; Captain Ham; Lieutenant Collins; Officer Reeves; Corporal Rhonda Latimer; Major Garry L. Bryant; Officer Ashe; Deputy Holden; Lieutenant Hayden; Lieutenant Looper; Sergeant Tribble, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-08-26
Citations: 582 F. App'x 218
Docket Number: No. 14-6783
Parties: Mauricio E. WEBER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Corporal SANTOS, Defendant-Appellee, and Captain Arlette Jones; Lieutenant Hankins; Captain Ham; Lieutenant Collins; Officer Reeves; Corporal Rhonda Latimer; Major Garry L. Bryant; Officer Ashe; Deputy Holden; Lieutenant Hayden; Lieutenant Looper; Sergeant Tribble, Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 582
Pages: 218–218

Head Matter:
Mauricio E. WEBER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Corporal SANTOS, Defendant-Appellee, and Captain Arlette Jones; Lieutenant Hankins; Captain Ham; Lieutenant Collins; Officer Reeves; Corporal Rhonda Latimer; Major Garry L. Bryant; Officer Ashe; Deputy Holden; Lieutenant Hayden; Lieutenant Looper; Sergeant Tribble, Defendants.
No. 14-6783.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 21, 2014.
Decided: Aug. 26, 2014.
Mauricio E. Weber, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Michael Pruitt, McDonald, Patrick, Poston, Hemphill & Roper, LLC, Greenwood, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Mauricio E. Weber appeals the district court's order dismissing his action asserting civil rights and state law claims for failure to prosecute. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Weber's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, Weber has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We deny Weber's motions for stay pending appeal, injunctive relief, and a restraining order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.