Case Name: PEOPLE ex rel. AMERICAN FLAG CO. v. BARKER et al.
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1895-12-18
Citations: 37 N.Y.S. 106
Docket Number: 
Parties: PEOPLE ex rel. AMERICAN FLAG CO. v. BARKER et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 37
Pages: 106–107

Head Matter:
PEOPLE ex rel. AMERICAN FLAG CO. v. BARKER et al.
(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.
December 18, 1895.)
1. Taxation—Assessment—Statement by Owneb.
Where the only evidence as to the value of property of a corporation, and the amount of its debts and exemptions, from which the assessors are to determine the amount on which the corporation is taxable (Laws 1857, c. 456), consists of statements made by the corporation, with affidavits of its president, that the total assets amount to a certain sum, and that its liabilities amount to a certain sum, which exceeds the assets, it is error to make an assessment in disregard of the' statement as to the liabilities, though such statements also show that the company had a paid-in stock largely exceeding the amount of liabilities, which stock was-“paid for the sale of good will, and services.”
3. Same—Deduction op Debts.
Laws 1857, c. 456, providing that, in estimating the taxable value of the property of a corporation, its liabilities shall be deducted from its assets, a corporation is entitled to have deducted an indebtedness represented by debentures, though some of the debentures have not actually been issued.
The opinion of Mr. Justice INGRAHAM at special term is as follows:
I do not think there was anything before the tax commissioners to justify them in making the assessment that they did. Under chapter 456 of the Laws-of 1857, the commissioners were required to ascertain the valuation of the-whole property owned by the corporation, whether real or personal, or both, in order to ascertain the capital which was the subject of taxation (People-v. Barker, 144 N. Y. 94, 39 N. E. 13), and from the aggregate deduct the debts of the corporation, and any exemption allowed by law. The only evidence-before the commissioners appears to have been the two statements made by the company, and an affidavit of its president, by which it appears that the total assets of the company, including all its property, were $197,988.90;: that the liabilities were debenture certificates actually issued, amounting to-$148,300, and certificates agreed to be issued, for services and property purchased, and for which the company was-indebted $55,050, making an aggregate of $203,950,—showing the corporation to be insolvent. It is stated in the first statement rendered that the capital stock actually paid in, of $400,-000, was “paid by sale of good will, and service”; but there is nothing to show that at the time the statement was made, on the second Monday in January, 1894, this good will and services for which the capital stock was-issued was of any value, and that fact is accompanied by the express statement, under oath, that the totS.1 gross assets of the corporation were $197,-988.90. It is true, the statement made by the corporation is not conclusive upon the tax commissioners, but at the same time they must have some evidence before them to justify their action. They could have required the-officers of this corporation to appear before them, and submit to an examination as to the property owned by the company for which this capital stock was issued. They omitted to require such testimony, but, according to their return, did accept the statement of the officers of the company as to the amount of its assets, disallowing certain alleged indebtedness because the statement said that the debentures representing that indebtedness had not been issued. In that the commissioners were clearly in error, as the amount of the indebtedness for which the company had agreed to issue these debentures is just as much the indebtedness -of the company as if the debentures had been issued. The commissioners having accepted this statement of $197,988.90 as the total gross assets of the company, the court cannot say, upon the evidence before it, that they should have found that the capital stock of $400,000 was unimpaired. On the contrary, I am of the opinion that, upon the evidence before the board, there was nothing upon which to sustain such a finding. I think, therefore, the proceeding of the tax commissioners must be reversed, and the assessment vacated.
Appeal from special term, New York county.
Certiorari by the American Flag Company to review the action of Edward P. Barker and others, commissioners of taxes and assessments of the city of New York, in assessing the property of relator in the year 1894. From an order vacating the. assessment, defendants appeal. Affirmed.
R. S. Barlow, for appellants.
W. M. Rosebault, for respondent,

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements, upon opinion of the court at special term.