Case Name: Clark C. JONES and Charles L. Deibert, Appellants, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE STATE OF OREGON, Respondent
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1993-03-18
Citations: 315 Or. 497
Docket Number: OTC 3088; SC S39507
Parties: Clark C. JONES and Charles L. Deibert, Appellants, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE STATE OF OREGON, Respondent.
Judges: PER CURIAM
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 315
Pages: 497–499

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted March 1,
judgment of the Tax Court affirmed March 18, 1993
Clark C. JONES and Charles L. Deibert, Appellants, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE STATE OF OREGON, Respondent.
(OTC 3088; SC S39507)
847 P2d 407
David R. Kluge, Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellants.
James C. Wallace, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent. With him on the brief was Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, Salem.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Plaintiff taxpayers challenge a decision of the Oregon Tax Court concerning two years of tax assessments on property owned by plaintiffs. Plaintiffs did not timely challenge the assessments for the years in question. Plaintiffs claim that they should be permitted to challenge the assessments nonetheless, because a "gross error," within the meaning of ORS 306.115(3)(a)(B) (1989), has been committed.
All that is at issue in this case is whether plaintiffs made a sufficient showing of "gross error" to the defendant Department of Revenue (or, on appeal, to the Tax Court) to require that the Department hold a hearing to address the merits of plaintiffs' claim. The Tax Court held that plaintiffs had not made such a showing. On de novo review, ORS 305.445, we agree. Recitation of the pertinent facts that lead us to our conclusion would not benefit bench or bar.
The judgment of the Tax Court is affirmed.
The legislature amended ORS 306.115 in 1991, deleting the term "gross error." Or Laws 1991, ch 459, § 32.