Case Name: GPI INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. IBC CREATIVE, LLC., IBC Creative, Inc., Consumer Products Distribution, LLC., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees, GP Battery Marketing-Latin America, Inc., Counter-Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-09-21
Citations: 396 F. App'x 661
Docket Number: No. 09-15423
Parties: GPI INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. IBC CREATIVE, LLC., IBC Creative, Inc., Consumer Products Distribution, LLC., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees, GP Battery Marketing-Latin America, Inc., Counter-Defendant.
Judges: Before HULL, MARTIN and FAY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 396
Pages: 661–662

Head Matter:
GPI INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. IBC CREATIVE, LLC., IBC Creative, Inc., Consumer Products Distribution, LLC., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees, GP Battery Marketing-Latin America, Inc., Counter-Defendant.
No. 09-15423.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Sept. 21, 2010.
John M. Reynolds, Saint Louis, MO, for Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees.
Dana M. Richens, Smith Gambrell Russell, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant.
Before HULL, MARTIN and FAY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
This matter involves the question of money due and owing from the sale of batteries. The trial court entered numerous rulings, a partial summary judgment and ultimately resolved the case in a bench trial. The issues presented by the appellants are:
(1) Whether the trial court erred in granting GPI partial summary judgment, and (2) Whether the trial court erred in entering judgment against IBC Creative Inc.'s counterclaims?
After studying the briefs and the record and hearing oral argument, we find no reversible error. The record fully supports the rulings of the trial court as ex plained in the Orders of July 28, 2009 and September 16, 2009 and in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order Directing Entry of Judgment dated September 28, 2009.
AFFIRMED.
. A cross-appeal was filed but counsel confirms that it has been abandoned.