Case Name: ELOISE MARINOS ET AL. v. DAVID POIROT ET AL.
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 2012-02-21
Citations: 303 Conn. 940
Docket Number: SC 18924
Parties: ELOISE MARINOS ET AL. v. DAVID POIROT ET AL.
Judges: PALMER, McLACHLAN and HARPER, Js., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 303
Pages: 940–940

Head Matter:
ELOISE MARINOS ET AL. v. DAVID POIROT ET AL.
Decided February 21, 2012
The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18924.
John R. Williams, in support of the petition.
David M. Poirot, in opposition.

Opinion:
The plaintiffs' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 132 Conn. App. 693 (AC 33193), is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court properly determine that, on a Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA) claim for damages, the trial court properly entered summary judgment in favor of the defendants because the plaintiff 'failed to produce an itemization of her claimed CUTPA damages?' "
PALMER, McLACHLAN and HARPER, Js., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.