Case Name: David Anthony HARTSFIELD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-11-22
Citations: 683 So. 2d 622
Docket Number: No. 95-01320
Parties: David Anthony HARTSFIELD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and QUINCE, J., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 683
Pages: 622–622

Head Matter:
David Anthony HARTSFIELD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 95-01320.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Nov. 22, 1996.
Daniel M. Hernandez of Daniel M. Hernandez, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robert J. Krauss, Sr. Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

Opinion:
FRANK, Judge.
David Hartsfield appeals from a final order which revoked his probation. Revocation was premised upon Hartsfield's admission that he absconded from supervision. We have reviewed this matter in accordance with our obligation under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); and affirm. See In Re Anders Briefs, 581 So.2d 149 (Fla.1991). We remand, however, for the entry of a corrected order which conforms to the trial court's oral findings. Specifically, Hartsfield admitted to violations contained in a November 22, 1994, affidavit. The written order, however, refers to violations contained in a June 3, 1994, affidavit— violations for which the trial court heard no evidence. Upon remand, Hartsfield need not be present for the entry of a corrected order. See Dunlap v. State, 405 So.2d 796 (Fla. 2d DCA1981).
SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and QUINCE, J., concur.