Case Name: NBCP URBAN RENEWAL PARTNERSHIP, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CITY OF NEWARK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1998-10-21
Citations: 17 N.J. Tax 505
Docket Number: 
Parties: NBCP URBAN RENEWAL PARTNERSHIP, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CITY OF NEWARK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Tax Court Reports
Volume: 17
Pages: 505–506

Head Matter:
NBCP URBAN RENEWAL PARTNERSHIP, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CITY OF NEWARK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued October 6, 1998
Decided October 21, 1998.
Before Judges PRESSLER, BROCHIN and STEINBERG.
Donald F. Miceli, argued the cause for appellant (Carella, Byrne, Bain, Gilfillan, Cecchi, Stewart & Olstein, attorneys; Mr. Miceli and Richard K. Matanle, on the brief).
Demetrice R. Miles, Assistant Corporation Counsel, argued the cause for respondent (Michelle Hollar-Gregory, Corporation Counsel, attorney; Mr. Miles, on the brief).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Tax Court, based on its conclusion that the Business Retention Act, N.J.S.A 54:4-1.13 -1.16, does not affect plaintiffs statutory service payments in lieu of taxes, is affirmed, substantially for the reasons stated by Judge Small in his decision reported at 17 N.J.Tax 59 (Tax 1997).