Case Name: Willie Lee BERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M. Timothy PORTERFIELD, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-05-27
Citations: 325 F. App'x 245
Docket Number: No. 08-8571
Parties: Willie Lee BERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M. Timothy PORTERFIELD, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 325
Pages: 245–246

Head Matter:
Willie Lee BERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M. Timothy PORTERFIELD, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 08-8571.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 21, 2009.
Decided: May 27, 2009.
Willie Lee Berry, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Willie Lee Berry appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reconsideration of its previous order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Berry v. Porterfield, No. 3:01-cv-00627-GCM, 2008 WL 5115284 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 4, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.