Case Name: William Broadbelt, Respondent, v. Sarah L. Loew, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1900-04-17
Citations: 162 N.Y. 642
Docket Number: 
Parties: William Broadbelt, Respondent, v. Sarah L. Loew, Appellant.
Judges: Concur: Geay, O’Brien, Haight, Landon, Cullen and Weeneb, JJ. Not sitting: Pabkee, Ch. J.
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 162
Pages: 642–643

Head Matter:
William Broadbelt, Respondent, v. Sarah L. Loew, Appellant.
Broadbelt v. Loew, 15 App. Div. 343, affirmed.
(Argued March 30, 1900;
decided April 17, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment and order of- the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial depart ment, entered, respectively, April 19 and March 5, 1897, reversing a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at Special Term and directing judgment for the plaintiff.
David McClure for appellant.
John Frankenheimer for respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below,
Concur: Geay, O'Brien, Haight, Landon, Cullen and Weeneb, JJ. Not sitting: Pabkee, Ch. J.