Case Name: BOWERS et ux, Appellants, v. CRONIN et al, Respondents
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1985-01-16
Citations: 71 Or. App. 649
Docket Number: A8401-00467; CA A31662
Parties: BOWERS et ux, Appellants, v. CRONIN et al, Respondents.
Judges: Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Young, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 71
Pages: 649–650

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted December 3, 1984,
reversed and remanded January 16, 1985
BOWERS et ux, Appellants, v. CRONIN et al, Respondents.
([ AXXXX-XXXXX ]; CA A31662)
693 P2d 1319
Michael J. Martinis, Salem, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief was Webb & Martinis, Salem.
Mildred J. Carmack, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With her on the brief were Mark H. Wagner and Schwabe, Williamson, Wyatt, Moore & Roberts, Portland.
Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Young, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
In this invasion of privacy case, plaintiffs' complaint was found insufficient under ORCP 21A(8) and was dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiffs appeal. We hold that the trial court should have given plaintiffs the opportunity to plead further. ORCP 25A.
Reversed and remanded.
Our disposition of this case makes plaintiffs' other assignments of error either premature or moot.