Case Name: Kaseame POINTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-05-18
Citations: 991 S.W.2d 214
Docket Number: No. 74673
Parties: Kaseame POINTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr. C.J., K. KAROHL, J. and L. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 991
Pages: 214–214

Head Matter:
Kaseame POINTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 74673.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
May 18, 1999.
S. Paige Canfield, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr. C.J., K. KAROHL, J. and L. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Kaseame Pointer, Movant, appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).