Case Name: Stan ARNOLD, Appellant, v. The CITY OF FLORISSANT, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1994-03-08
Citations: 871 S.W.2d 145
Docket Number: No. 64420
Parties: Stan ARNOLD, Appellant, v. The CITY OF FLORISSANT, Respondent.
Judges: Before GRIMM, P.J., and CARL R. GAERTNER and AHRENS, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 871
Pages: 145–145

Head Matter:
Stan ARNOLD, Appellant, v. The CITY OF FLORISSANT, Respondent.
No. 64420.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
March 8, 1994.
Althea Johns, St. Louis, for appellant.
John Michael Hessel, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before GRIMM, P.J., and CARL R. GAERTNER and AHRENS, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, a police officer of the City of Florissant, appeals the judgment of the circuit court affirming the disciplinary action imposed against him by the Florissant Personnel Commission. The Commission's decision was supported by competent and substantial evidence, was not arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable, and is not in violation of constitutional provisions or in excess of statutory authority. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. However the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information setting forth the facts and reasons for which the trial court's judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).