Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marion PROMISE, a/k/a Mario, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-04-02
Citations: 517 F. App'x 149
Docket Number: No. 12-7923
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marion PROMISE, a/k/a Mario, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 517
Pages: 149–149

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marion PROMISE, a/k/a Mario, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-7923.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 26, 2013.
Decided: April 2, 2013.
Marion Promise, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina; Dana Owen Washington, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Marion Promise appeals the district court's order denying his Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a) motion to correct sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Promise, No. 3:98-cr-00007-GCM-2 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 23, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.