Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Elvis Lee KELLY, Defendant/Appellant; Elvis Lee KELLY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1996-09-10
Citations: 928 S.W.2d 407
Docket Number: Nos. 68182, 69775
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Elvis Lee KELLY, Defendant/Appellant. Elvis Lee KELLY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 928
Pages: 407–408

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Elvis Lee KELLY, Defendant/Appellant. Elvis Lee KELLY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Nos. 68182, 69775.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Sept. 10, 1996.
John M. Schilmoeller, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, David G. Brown, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals after he was convicted by a jury of one count of rape of a child less than fourteen years old, § 566.030, RSMo Supp.1992. The court sentenced him in accordance with the jury's assessment to a prison term of twenty years. Defendant also appeals the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief.
We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).