Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francisco Antonio PENA-ZAVALA, also known as Francisco Antonio Pena Zavala, also known as Manuel Duarte, also known as Francisco Antonio Dena-Zavala, also known as Francisco A. Pena Z., also known as Francisco Pena, also known as Milton Santiago Pena, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-09-30
Citations: 582 F. App'x 503
Docket Number: No. 13-20723
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francisco Antonio PENA-ZAVALA, also known as Francisco Antonio Pena Zavala, also known as Manuel Duarte, also known as Francisco Antonio Dena-Zavala, also known as Francisco A. Pena Z., also known as Francisco Pena, also known as Milton Santiago Pena, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 582
Pages: 503–504

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francisco Antonio PENA-ZAVALA, also known as Francisco Antonio Pena Zavala, also known as Manuel Duarte, also known as Francisco Antonio Dena-Zavala, also known as Francisco A. Pena Z., also known as Francisco Pena, also known as Milton Santiago Pena, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-20723
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Sept. 30, 2014.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Michael Lance Herman, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Francisco Antonio Pena Zavala (Pena) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Pena has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Pena's response. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.