Case Name: The State of Ohio, Appellant, v. Van Johnson, Appellee
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1992-03-25
Citations: 63 Ohio St. 3d 306
Docket Number: No. 91-1413
Parties: The State of Ohio, Appellant, v. Van Johnson, Appellee.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Holmes, Douglas and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 63
Pages: 306–307

Head Matter:
The State of Ohio, Appellant, v. Van Johnson, Appellee.
[Cite as State v. Van Johnson (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 306.]
(No. 91-1413
Submitted February 11, 1992
Decided March 25, 1992.)
Lee C. Falke, Prosecuting Attorney, and Lorine M. Reid, for appellant.
Rebecca Barthelemy-Smith, for appellee.

Opinion:
This cause is reversed on the authority of State v. Murnahan (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 60, 584 N.E.2d 1204. However, the defendant-appellee may file for delayed reconsideration of his ineffectiveness-of-counsel claim in the Montgomery County Court of Appeals.
Moyer, C.J., Holmes, Douglas and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Sweeney, J., dissents based on his dissent in State v. Murnahan (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 60, 67-68, 584 N.E.2d 1204, 1210.
Wright and H. Brown, JJ., dissent.