Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Richard E. FRENCH, Appellant.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2019-05-07
Citations: 573 S.W.3d 764
Docket Number: No. ED 106414
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent,
v.
Richard E. FRENCH, Appellant.
Judges: Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Mary K. Hoff, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 573
Pages: 764–765

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent,
v.
Richard E. FRENCH, Appellant.
No. ED 106414
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
FILED: May 7, 2019
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: Casey Allen Taylor, 1000 West Nifong, Bldg 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203.
ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT: Justin Andrew Moody, Assistant Attorney General, 221 West High St., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.
Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Mary K. Hoff, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Richard E. French ("Defendant") appeals from the trial court's judgment convicting him of burglary in the first degree, in violation of Section 569.160, RSMo 2000. Defendant claims that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
Unless otherwise indicated, all further statutory references are to RSMo 2000 as amended.