Case Name: STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jorge Enrique RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Idaho Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Idaho
Decision Date: 2016-02-26
Citations: 160 Idaho 46
Docket Number: No. 42219
Parties: STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jorge Enrique RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Idaho Reports
Volume: 160
Pages: 46–46

Head Matter:
368 P.3d 666
STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jorge Enrique RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 42219.
Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, January 2016 Term.
Feb. 26, 2016.
Rehearing Denied April 22, 2016.
Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. Jason Pint-ler argued.
Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Idaho Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. Jessica Lorello argued.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Rodriguez makes the same argument as the Appellant in State v. McIntosh, No. 41910, 160 Idaho 1, 368 P.3d 621, 2016 WL 743356 (Idaho Feb. 25, 2016); and upon the authority of that case, and for the reasons therein stated, we affirm the district court.