Case Name: Evelyn Sebestyen v. William A. Sebestyen
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1989-08-11
Citations: 19 Conn. App. 807
Docket Number: 6488
Parties: Evelyn Sebestyen v. William A. Sebestyen
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Appellate Reports
Volume: 19
Pages: 807–808

Head Matter:
Evelyn Sebestyen v. William A. Sebestyen
(6488)
Dupont, C. J., Bokden and O’Connell, Is.
Submitted on briefs January 8 —
decision released August 11, 1989
Gaetano Ferro filed a brief for the appellant-appellee (defendant).
Jane Phillips and Salvatore C. DePiano filed a brief for the appellee-appellant (plaintiff).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We have carefully considered each of the claims of error in the defendant's appeal and in the plaintiff's cross appeal. Our review of the record and briefs, coupled with an analysis of the claims of error by the parties, indicates that the trial court acted reasonably, in the exercise of its discretion and in accordance with the law.
More particularly, the court did not abuse its discretion in awarding costs and expenses of litigation to the plaintiff. Stoner v. Stoner, 163 Conn. 345, 353-56, 307 A.2d 146 (1972); see also Turgeon v. Turgeon, 190 Conn. 269, 280-83, 460 A.2d 1260 (1983).
There is no error.