Case Name: STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Duane A. CONGDON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Idaho Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Idaho
Decision Date: 1974-12-20
Citations: 96 Idaho 377
Docket Number: No. 11488
Parties: STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Duane A. CONGDON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Idaho Reports
Volume: 96
Pages: 377–377

Head Matter:
529 P.2d 773
STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Duane A. CONGDON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11488.
Supreme Court of Idaho.
Dec. 20, 1974.
Howard Manweiler, Boise, Jerry L. Wegman, Moscow, for defendant-appellant.
W. Anthony Park, Atty. Gen., Conley Ward, Jr. Asst. Atty. Gen., Boise, for plaintiff-respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appellant, who was convicted of delivery of a controlled substance based upon his plea of guilty, appeals solely on the claim that he was under the influence of paint thinner fumes at the time he entered his plea of guilty, and thus that- plea was not voluntarily entered. The record does not support this allegation. Such matters, outside of the record, cannot be considered on appeal, but must be raised, if at all, by an application for post conviction relief. I.C. § 19-4901 et seq.
Judgment of conviction affirmed.