Case Name: Florence Radosh, Also Known as Florence Rae, Appellant, v. Eddie H. Shipstad et al., Doing Business as Ice Follies, Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1967-12-07
Citations: 20 N.Y.2d 969
Docket Number: 
Parties: Florence Radosh, Also Known as Florence Rae, Appellant, v. Eddie H. Shipstad et al., Doing Business as Ice Follies, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 20
Pages: 969–969

Head Matter:
Florence Radosh, Also Known as Florence Rae, Appellant, v. Eddie H. Shipstad et al., Doing Business as Ice Follies, Respondents.
Submitted December 4, 1967;
decided December 7, 1967.

Opinion:
Motion for reargument denied, with $10 costs. Plaintiff, in proving her damages, need only show that similar employment was available during the suspension period and that she could have qualified for such employment. [See 20 N Y 2d 504.]