Case Name: Dwayne E. HARRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2013-06-18
Citations: 401 S.W.3d 577
Docket Number: No. ED 98788
Parties: Dwayne E. HARRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., C.J., ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J., and ZEL M. FISCHER, Sp. J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 401
Pages: 577–578

Head Matter:
Dwayne E. HARRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 98788.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District.
June 18, 2013.
Jessica Hathaway, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Todd T. Smith, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., C.J., ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J., and ZEL M. FISCHER, Sp. J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Dwayne Harris ("Harris") appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-convietion relief without an evi-dentiary hearing. We find that the motion court did not err in denying Harris's request for post-conviction relief. We affirm.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).