Case Name: Jumah Thomas MOORE-ALI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jeanne S. WOODFORD; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-07-20
Citations: 388 F. App'x 693
Docket Number: No. 08-15424
Parties: Jumah Thomas MOORE-ALI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jeanne S. WOODFORD; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 388
Pages: 693–694

Head Matter:
Jumah Thomas MOORE-ALI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jeanne S. WOODFORD; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 08-15424.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 29, 2010.
Filed July 20, 2010.
Jumah Thomas Moore-Ali, Crescent City, CA, pro se.
Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Jumah Thomas Moore-Ali, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court's order denying him leave to proceed in forma pauperis in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that defendants violated his constitutional rights. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court's interpretation and application of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1052 (9th Cir.2007), and review for an abuse of discretion its denial of leave to proceed in forma pauperis, O'Loughlin v. Doe, 920 F.2d 614, 616 (9th Cir.1990). We affirm.
Moore-Ali does not contest on appeal that he is a three-strikes filer, and the district court properly determined that he did not show that the denial of Halal meat placed him "under imminent danger of serious physical injury." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.