Case Name: The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Satterfield, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2010-03-04
Citations: 124 Ohio St. 3d 474
Docket Number: No. 2008-1424
Parties: The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Satterfield, Appellant.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 124
Pages: 474–475

Head Matter:
The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Satterfield, Appellant.
[Cite as State v. Satterfield, 124 Ohio St.3d 474, 2010-Ohio-725.]
(No. 2008-1424
Submitted January 13, 2010
Decided March 4, 2010.)
Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Paula E. Adams, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
Roger W. Kirk, for appellant.

Opinion:
{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed as to the court of appeals' holding on the retrospective application of H.B. 137 on the authority of State v. Singleton, 124 Ohio St.3d 173, 2009-Ohio-6434, 920 N.E.2d 958. R.C. 2929.191 may not be applied to a sentence entered prior to July 11, 2006.
Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, O'Connor, O'Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Lundberg Stratton and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Lanzinger, J., in State v. Singleton.