Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DONTAE LAMAR MARKS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2009-04-22
Citations: 227 Or. App. 634
Docket Number: 07P50273; A136456
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DONTAE LAMAR MARKS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Sercombe, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 227
Pages: 634–635

Head Matter:
Submitted December 5, 2008,
remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed April 22, 2009
STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DONTAE LAMAR MARKS, Defendant-Appellant.
Polk County Circuit Court
07P50273; A136456
206 P3d 1102
Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, and Erica Herb, Deputy Public Defender, Legal Services Division, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Amanda J. Austin, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Sercombe, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant was convicted of criminal contempt of court for failing to pay child support. ORS 33.065. The trial court imposed a six-year term of probation. On appeal, defendant argues that the maximum term of probation for his crime is five years, ORS 137.010(4), and that the trial court's imposition of a six-year term constitutes error apparent on the face of the record under ORAP 5.45. The state concedes that the court plainly erred and that the case should be remanded for resentencing. We agree that the error is apparent on the face of the record and, given the gravity of the error and the state's concession, exercise our discretion to correct it.
Remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.