Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Charles Rochester, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1992-01-27
Citations: 179 A.D.2d 829
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles Rochester, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 179
Pages: 829–829

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles Rochester, Appellant.

Opinion:
The defendant's claim that the resentence violated the Eighth Amendment prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment is unpreserved for appellate review, and, in any event, is without merit. Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Eiber, Balletta and O'Brien, JJ., concur.