Case Name: NEWBY v. WALTERS
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1918-01-08
Citations: 67 Okla. 183
Docket Number: No. 9496
Parties: NEWBY v. WALTERS.
Judges: All the Justices 'concur.
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 67
Pages: 183–184

Head Matter:
NEWBY v. WALTERS.
No. 9496
Opinion Filed Jan. 8, 1918.
(169 Pac. 1070.)
(Syllabus.)
Appeal asd Error — Time of Taking Appeal— Statute — Jurisdiction.
Where plaintiff in error fails to file his appeal in this court within six months from ■the date of the rendition of the judgment or order appealed from, as required by chapter 18, 'Sess. Laws 1910-11, this court is without jurisdiction to review the judgment.
Error-from District Oótír't,'Pawnee County; Conn Limi, Judge. ' '
' Action between T. R. 'Newby, administra^ tor of the estate of A.'J.'-Vaughan, deceased, and Lillie May Vaughan Walters. Judgment for the latter, and the former brings error.
Dismissed.
. Edwin R. McNeill, for plaintiff in error.
Claude -C- McCollum and R. S, Cole, .for defendant in error. :

Opinion:
OWEN, J.
Defendant in error moves to dismiss the appeal in this case for the reason that the case-made and petition in error was not filed in this court within six months áfter the rendition of the judgment sought to he reviewed on this appeal.
If appears that the motion for new trial was overruled and final judgment rendered in the district court on the 31st day of March, 1917, and the petition in error, with case-made attached, was filed in this court on'"October 6, 1917." Under the provisions of chapter IS, B. L. Í910-11, this court is without jurisdiction to review the judgment of the district court, the ease-made not having been filed within -six months after the rendition of the judgment appealed from.
The appeal is therefore dismissed.
All the Justices 'concur.