Case Name: George HAYNES, Petitioner, v. H & H ENGINEERING, INC., Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1968-03-06
Citations: 207 So. 2d 683
Docket Number: No. 36965
Parties: George HAYNES, Petitioner, v. H & H ENGINEERING, INC., Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
Judges: CALDWELL, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 207
Pages: 683–683

Head Matter:
George HAYNES, Petitioner, v. H & H ENGINEERING, INC., Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
No. 36965.
Supreme Court of Florida.
March 6, 1968.
Joseph Rosenkrantz and Theodore M. Trushin, Miami Beach, for petitioner.
Charles Desmond Crowley, Ft. Lauder-dale, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date October 26, 1967.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
It is further ordered that the petitioner's petition for allowance of attorneys' fees, be and the same is hereby denied.
CALDWELL, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.