Case Name: Steve LESTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL "PERRY"; Capt. Randall; Ofc. Fish; Ofc. Alewine, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-10-24
Citations: 699 F. App'x 249
Docket Number: No. 17-6751
Parties: Steve LESTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL “PERRY”; Capt. Randall; Ofc. Fish; Ofc. Alewine, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 699
Pages: 249–249

Head Matter:
Steve LESTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL “PERRY”; Capt. Randall; Ofc. Fish; Ofc. Alewine, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 17-6751
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: October 19, 2017
Decided: October 24, 2017
Steve Lester, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Steve Lester appeals the district court's order accepting in part the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Lester's motion to appoint counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lester v. SCDOC Perry, No. 4:16-cv-03829-TMC, 2017 WL 2377530 (D.S.C. June 1, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED