Case Name: UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee v. Shawn LEE Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-06-05
Citations: 690 F. App'x 445
Docket Number: No. 16-3134
Parties: UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee v. Shawn LEE Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before SHEPHERD, MURPHY, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 690
Pages: 445–446

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee v. Shawn LEE Defendant-Appellant
No. 16-3134
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: May 24, 2017
Filed: June 5, 2017
Hunter Bridges, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Shawn Lee, Pro Se
Before SHEPHERD, MURPHY, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Shawn Lee directly appeals the sentence the district court imposed after he pled guilty to possessing a prohibited object in prison, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1791(a)(2) and (d)(1)(B). His counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), arguing that Lee's sentence is unreasonable.
After careful review, we conclude that the district court did not impose an unrea sonable sentence. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (discussing appellate review of sentences; if sentence is within Guidelines range, appellate court may apply, but is not required to apply, presumption of reasonableness). Having independently reviewed the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we have found no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw, and we affirm.
. The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.