Case Name: UNITED STATES of America v. Keith BECK, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-01-26
Citations: 709 F. App'x 162
Docket Number: No. 17-1709
Parties: UNITED STATES of America v. Keith BECK, Appellant
Judges: Before: AMBRO, RESTREPO, and FUENTES, Circuit Judges
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 709
Pages: 162–162

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America v. Keith BECK, Appellant
No. 17-1709
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) January 16, 2018
(Opinion filed: January 26, 2018)
Rebecca R. Haywood, Esq., Laura S. Irwin, Esq., Office of United States Attorney, Pittsburgh, PA, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Steven C. Townsend, Esq., Eddy DeLu-ca Gravina & Townsend, Pittsburgh, PA, for Defendant-Appellant
Before: AMBRO, RESTREPO, and FUENTES, Circuit Judges

Opinion:
OPINION
AMBRO, Circuit Judge
The Government met its burden of proving Beck violated the conditions of release on the basis of the positive drug test on January 11, 2017. See U.S.S.G. § 7B1.1. That test was listed on the Government's pre-hearing petition, thus any further notice deficiencies cannot amount to clear error for lack of prejudice. See United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 734, 113 S.Ct. 1770, 123 L.Ed.2d 508 (1993). The District Court's judgment revoking Beck's supervised release is affirmed.
This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent.