Case Name: Hattie Ray KING and James Albert King, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1964-01-29
Citations: 327 F.2d 495
Docket Number: No. 20466
Parties: Hattie Ray KING and James Albert King, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 327
Pages: 495–495

Head Matter:
Hattie Ray KING and James Albert King, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 20466.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
Jan. 29, 1964.
Rehearing Denied March 3, 1964.
John Gregg, Jackson, Miss., Hugh L. Bailey, Winona, Miss., for appellants.
H. M. Ray, U. S. Atty., Oxford, Miss., for appellee.
Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and HUTCHESON and GEWIN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
After careful consideration, we conclude that' there is no substance in the grounds asserted for this appeal. Counsel took no exceptions to the charge of the court, thus failing to preserve any claim of error arising from the charge. We think it is plain that there is no basis for the contention here made that the trial court's comments on the evidence constituted substantial error against appellants.
The judgment is affirmed.