Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tavaris Leon DUNLAP, a/k/a Onion, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-11-07
Citations: 487 F. App'x 805
Docket Number: No. 12-7030
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tavaris Leon DUNLAP, a/k/a Onion, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 487
Pages: 805–806

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tavaris Leon DUNLAP, a/k/a Onion, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-7030.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 2, 2012.
Decided: Nov. 7, 2012.
Tavaris Leon Dunlap, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Tavaris Leon Dunlap appeals the district court's order denying his motion for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Dunlap, No. 4:07-cr-00482-TLW-3 (D.S.C. May 30, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.