Case Name: In re Steven H. BERKOWITZ, Respondent
Court: District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Decision Date: 2016-08-04
Citations: 144 A.3d 564
Docket Number: No. 16-BG-469
Parties: In re Steven H. BERKOWITZ, Respondent.
Judges: Before: GLICKMAN, Associate Judge, and NEBEKER and FARRELL, Senior Judges.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 144
Pages: 564–565

Head Matter:
In re Steven H. BERKOWITZ, Respondent.
No. 16-BG-469.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Filed Aug. 4, 2016.
Bar Registration No. 104315, DDN: 3-16.
Before: GLICKMAN, Associate Judge, and NEBEKER and FARRELL, Senior Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
On consideration of the certified order changing respondent's status to practice law in the state of Pennsylvania to disability inactive and staying the resolution of his pending disciplinary grievance, this court's June 3, 2016, order suspending respondent and directing him to show cause why he should not be indefinitely suspended pursuant to a disability suspension under D.C. Bar R. XI § 13, and the statement of Disciplinary Counsel, and it appearing that respondent has failed to' file either a response to this court's order to show cause or the affidavit as required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is'
ORDERED that Steven H. Berkowitz is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI § 13. It is
FURTHER ORDERED, that respondent's attention is directed to the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI § 14 relating to suspended attorneys and to the provisions of. Rule XI § 16(c) dealing with the timing of eligibility for reinstatement as related to compliance with D.C. Bar R. XI § 14, including the filing of the required affidavit.