Case Name: Winfred F. NICHOLSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Theresa V. DANIELS, Internal Revenue Service, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-12-22
Citations: 405 F. App'x 801
Docket Number: No. 10-1877
Parties: Winfred F. NICHOLSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Theresa V. DANIELS, Internal Revenue Service, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 405
Pages: 801–801

Head Matter:
Winfred F. NICHOLSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Theresa V. DANIELS, Internal Revenue Service, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 10-1877.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 16, 2010.
Decided: Dec. 22, 2010.
Winfred F. Nicholson, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis Carl Barghaan, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia; Steven Wesley Parks, Rachel Ida Wollitzer, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Winfred F. Nicholson appeals the district court's order dismissing, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006), his complaint in which he challenged the validity of the federal income tax statutes and the Internal Revenue Service's levies to collect his income tax liabilities. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Nicholson v. Daniels, No. 1:10-cv-00168-CMHTCB (E.D. Va. filed July 12, 2010; entered July 13, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.