Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Scott CASH, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-04-26
Citations: 425 F. App'x 200
Docket Number: No. 10-7698
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Scott CASH, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 425
Pages: 200–201

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Scott CASH, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-7698.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 21, 2011.
Decided: April 26, 2011.
Michael Scott Cash, Appellant Pro Se. Isaac Louis Johnson, Jr., Office of the United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Michael Scott Cash appeals the district court's orders adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Cash's motion to return property and denying Cash's motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Cash, Nos. 6:05-cv-00338-MBS; 6:99-cr-00266-MB (D.S.C. Oct. 21, 2010); 2010 WL 2650022 (July 1, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.