Case Name: F.R., a juvenile, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2013-09-19
Citations: 122 So. 3d 866
Docket Number: No. SC12-602
Parties: F.R., a juvenile, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: POLSTON, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 122
Pages: 866–866

Head Matter:
F.R., a juvenile, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. SC12-602.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Sept. 19, 2013.
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Brian L. Ellison, Assistant Public Defender, Miami, FL, for Petitioner.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, FL; Jill D. Kramer, Assistant Attorney General and Richard L. Polin, Bureau Chief, Miami, FL, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted review of the decision in F.R. v. State, 81 So.3d 572 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we have determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss this review proceeding.
It is so ordered.
POLSTON, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.
CANADY, J., concurs in result.