Case Name: Arnold Benson CLARKE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. E.I. DUPONT DeNEMOURS & CO. INC., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-03-28
Citations: 515 F. App'x 201
Docket Number: No. 12-2403
Parties: Arnold Benson CLARKE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. E.I. DUPONT DeNEMOURS & CO. INC., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 515
Pages: 201–201

Head Matter:
Arnold Benson CLARKE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. E.I. DUPONT DeNEMOURS & CO. INC., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 12-2403.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 26, 2013.
Decided: March 28, 2013.
Arnold Benson Clarke, Appellant Pro Se.
Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
This opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Arnold Benson Clarke appeals the district court's orders denying his complaint and amended complaint alleging claims of breach of contract, patent infringement, fraud, conspiracy, and racial discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Clarke v. E.I. Dupont DeNemours, No. 3:12-ev-00711-JAG (E.D. Va. Oct. 22 & Nov. 6, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.