Case Name: BOWMAN, THOMPSON & CO., Limited, v. FUERST et al.
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1894-03-16
Citations: 28 N.Y.S. 169
Docket Number: No. 51
Parties: BOWMAN, THOMPSON & CO., Limited, v. FUERST et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 28
Pages: 169–169

Head Matter:
BOWMAN, THOMPSON & CO., Limited, v. FUERST et al.
(No. 51.)
(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.
March 16, 1894.)
Appeal from special term, New York county.
Action by Bowman, Thompson & Co., Limited, against Joseph F. Fuerst, Albert F. Fuerst, and Jules Fuerst. From an order denying a motion to-vacate an order of arrest, defendants appeal. Affirmed.
Argued before VAN BRUNT, P. J., and O’BRIEN and FOLLETT, JJ.
I. M. Dittenhoefer, for appellants.
James Dunne, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
For the reasons expressed in the case of Bowman, Thompson & Co. v. Fuerst (herewith handed down) 28 N. Y, Supp. 168, the order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.