Case Name: Spring-Mercer Corporation, Appellant, v. Henry Goodman and Others, Individually and as Copartners Doing Business as H. Goodman & Sons, Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1926-01-28
Citations: 126 Misc. 371
Docket Number: 
Parties: Spring-Mercer Corporation, Appellant, v. Henry Goodman and Others, Individually and as Copartners Doing Business as H. Goodman & Sons, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 126
Pages: 371–371

Head Matter:
Spring-Mercer Corporation, Appellant, v. Henry Goodman and Others, Individually and as Copartners Doing Business as H. Goodman & Sons, Respondents.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
January 28, 1926.
Benjamin H. Wicksel, for the appellant.
William Weintraub, for the respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The nine holes cut through the wire lath and plastering in the ceiling, measuring approximately twelve inches by twelve inches each, do not constitute ordinary wear and tear. The tenant is hable to the landlord for such damage to the ceiling and should make reimbursement to cover the cost of repair.
Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and judgment directed for plaintiff in the sum of eighty dollars and costs.
All concur; present, Guy, Wagner and Lydon, JJ.