Case Name: IN THE MATTER OF MATTHEW M. MILLICHAP, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 2009-03-11
Citations: 198 N.J. 478
Docket Number: 
Parties: IN THE MATTER OF MATTHEW M. MILLICHAP, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 198
Pages: 478–479

Head Matter:
969 A.2d 1050
IN THE MATTER OF MATTHEW M. MILLICHAP, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.
March 11, 2009.

Opinion:
ORDER
The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 08-200, concluding on the record certified to he Board pursuant to Rule 1:20—4(f) (default by respondent), that MATTHEW M. MILLICHAP of LITTLE EGG HARBOR, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1972, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months for violating RPC 4.1 (truthfulness in statements to others), RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and RPC 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice);
And MATTHEW M. MILLICHAP having been ordered to show cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined;
And good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that MATTHEW M. MILLICHAP is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months and until the further Order of the Court, effective April 10, 2009; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys; and it is further
ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further
ORDERED that pursuant to Rule l:20-20(c), respondent's failure to comply with the Affidavit of Compliance requirement of Rule l:20-20(b)(15) may (1) preclude the Disciplinary Review Board from considering respondent's petition for reinstatement for a period of up to six months from the date respondent files proof of compliance; (2) be found to constitute a violation of RPC 8.1(b) and RPC 8.4(e); and (8) provide a basis for an action for contempt pursuant to Rule 1:10-2; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.