Case Name: James A. Tillman, Appellant, v. Russo-Asiatic Bank, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1934-03-13
Citations: 264 N.Y. 467
Docket Number: 
Parties: James A. Tillman, Appellant, v. Russo-Asiatic Bank, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 264
Pages: 467–468

Head Matter:
James A. Tillman, Appellant, v. Russo-Asiatic Bank, Respondent.
(Argued February 27, 1934;
decided March 13, 1934.)
Borris M. Komar for appellant.
Maurice Léon and André Maximov for respondent.

Opinion:
Order affirmed, with costs. The effect of the ex parte order at Special Term was merely to create a notation on the record of valid action taken by the Federal court. First question certified in the affirmative. Second question certified not answered. No opinion. (See 264 N. Y. 670.)
Concur: Pound, Ch. J., Crane, Lehman, O'Brien, Hubbs and Crouch, JJ. Not sitting: Kellogg, J.