Case Name: George Wilson et al., trading as United Tin Trading Company, respondents, v. Marion E. Sandall, appellant
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1921-02-28
Citations: 92 N.J. Eq. 463
Docket Number: 
Parties: George Wilson et al., trading as United Tin Trading Company, respondents, v. Marion E. Sandall, appellant.
Judges: For affirmance—Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, Katzbnbaci-i, White, ITeprenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, Aokerson—15. .
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 92
Pages: 463–463

Head Matter:
George Wilson et al., trading as United Tin Trading Company, respondents, v. Marion E. Sandall, appellant.
[Decided February 28th, 1921.]
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Backes, and reported ante p. 130.
Mr. Norman Grey, for the respondents.
Mr. Lewis Fisher, for the appellant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.
For affirmance—Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, Katzbnbaci-i, White, ITeprenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, Aokerson—15. .
For reversal—None.