Case Name: Clarence E. SWARTHOUT, Jr., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Maureen Elizabeth SCHEIDT and William Paul McNaughten, Defendants/Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-10-26
Citations: 4 S.W.3d 621
Docket Number: No. ED 75152
Parties: Clarence E. SWARTHOUT, Jr., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Maureen Elizabeth SCHEIDT and William Paul McNaughten, Defendants/Respondents.
Judges: Before EATHIANNE RNAUP CRANE, P.J., and ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 4
Pages: 621–622

Head Matter:
Clarence E. SWARTHOUT, Jr., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Maureen Elizabeth SCHEIDT and William Paul McNaughten, Defendants/Respondents.
No. ED 75152.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Oct. 26, 1999.
James S. Collins, II, St. Louis, for appellant.
Gary E. Snodgrass, Rodney 0. MeWhin-ney, Denis C. Burns, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before EATHIANNE RNAUP CRANE, P.J., and ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff, Clarence E. Swarthout, Jr. (Plaintiff), appeals from a judgment entered upon the jury verdict in his personal injury action. Plaintiffs car was struck by a car driven by Defendant, Maureen Elizabeth Scheidt (Defendant Scheidt), whose car was struck by second Defendant, William Paul McNaughten (Defendant McNaughten). The jury found Plaintiff 33 1/3% at fault, Defendant Scheidt 33 1/3% at fault, and Defendant McNaughten 33 1/3% at fault. The jury found Plaintiffs damages totaled $3,600. Plaintiff alleges the trial court erred in submitting a comparative fault instruction. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file and the transcript. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).