Case Name: PAM'S CARPET SERVICE, INC., Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1979-03-12
Citations: 39 Or. App. 203
Docket Number: No. 78-T-9, CA 11210
Parties: PAM’S CARPET SERVICE, INC., Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION Respondent.
Judges: Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Thornton, Lee and Gillette, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 39
Pages: 203–205

Head Matter:
Argued February 26,
remanded for reconsideration March 12, 1979
PAM’S CARPET SERVICE, INC., Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION Respondent.
(No. 78-T-9, CA 11210)
591 P2d 427
Richard C. Hunt, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Richard F. Liebman, and Dezendorf, Spears, Lubersky & Campbell, Portland.
Al J. Laue, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were James A. Redden, Attorney General, and Walter L. Barrie, Solicitor General, Salem.
Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Thornton, Lee and Gillette, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
It is clear that the reasoning of the referee's order in this case is based upon Republic Dev. Co., Inc. v. Emp. Div., 32 Or App 263, 574 P2d 660 (1978). Subsequent to the entry of the referee's order the Supreme Court took Republic on review and, although affirming the result rejected our reasoning in that case. Republic Dev. Co., Inc. v. Emp. Div., 284 Or 431, 587 P2d 466 (1978).
We therefore remand for reconsideration in light of the Supreme Court opinion.
Remanded.