Case Name: BOARD OF COM'RS OF DELAWARE COUNTY v. FIELDS
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1913-09-09
Citations: 38 Okla. 744
Docket Number: No. 3552
Parties: BOARD OF COM’RS OF DELAWARE COUNTY v. FIELDS.
Judges: All the Justices concur,- except KANE and LOOEBOTJRROW, JJ., not participating. ■
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 38
Pages: 744–745

Head Matter:
BOARD OF COM’RS OF DELAWARE COUNTY v. FIELDS.
No. 3552.
Opinion Filed September 9, 1913.
(135 Pac. 423.)
REGISTERS OF DEEDS — Compensation. 1 A register of deeds, who was inducted into office on November 16, 1907, was, by reason of sections 3008 ,and 3028, Wilson’s Rev. & Ann. St. .1903 (Rev. Laws 1910, sec. 3225), and by reason of Act of the Legislature approved April 8, 1908 (Sess. Laws, 1907-08, pi 165), entitled to receive .after July 1, 1908, for the remainder of his term where the population of his county) was shown by the census taken by the assessors in 1908 to be-more than 10,000 inhabiI .- tants,.and less than 15,000 inhabitants, a salary of $1,200 per year, and to retain 50 per .cent, of all fees collected by him in excess of the above salary.
(Syllabus by the Court.)
Error from District Court, Detdwme. County; T. L. Brown, Judge.
Action by Geo.- W. Fields, Jr.,- against the Board of County Commissioners of. Delaware County. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
Affirmed.
Ad V. Coppedge, for plaintiff in error.
J. C. Austin,' for defendant in error.

Opinion:
HAYES, '.C. J.
Defendant in error brought this action in the court below to recover the balance he claimed to be due to him upon his salary as register of deeds of Delaware county. His term of office as such register, of deeds began on the 16th day of November, 1907, and ended- on the 8th day of January, 1911. By section 3008, Wilson's Rev. & Ann. St. 1903, it is provided that the register of deeds shall be allowed to retain out of the fees collected by him as his annual salary the following amounts and no more : In' counties of 10,000 inhabitants or less, $800; in counties of not less than 10,000 inhabitants, nor more than 15,000 inhabitants, $1,200; and, in addition thereto, he is allowed to retain 50 per cent, of all fees collected by him in excess of his salary.
Section 3028, Wilson's Rev. & Ann. St. 1903 (Rev. Laws 1910, sec. 3225), provides that, for the purpose of fixing the amount to be 'paid to thé officers provided for the 'boards of county commissioners shall adopt as a basis for .that purpose the number of' inhabitants of their respective counties as shown by the: returns of the assessors made in the year 1900 and each two years thereafter. By the special federal census of 1907, the population of Delaware county was less than 10,000 inhabitants. Under the census taken by the assessors of property and returned in June, 1908, the population was in' excess of 10,000. Defendant in error was paid a salary throughout the entire term of this office based on the population of the county as shown .by the special federal census of 1907. In this proceeding he seeks to recover the difference between the amount paid him and what his salary would be, based on the population of the county, as shown by the census of 1908. The judgment.of the trial court susr tains his contention, and renders him judgment for the amount claimed.
The same question of law is presented in this case that was presented and determined by this court in Board of Bounty Com'rs of Delaware County v. Williams, ante, 135 Pac. 420, and upon the authority of that case the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed.
All the Justices concur,- except KANE and LOOEBOTJRROW, JJ., not participating.