Case Name: James D. DAVIS, Kenneth Durden, Carl Morrow, Rex Wamer, Jason Stribling, Anthony Logan, Richard Carignan, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Kyle Mackenzie, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF LOGANVILLE, Georgia, a municipal corporation, Defendant-Appellee, James D. Bright, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-03-28
Citations: 221 F. App'x 897
Docket Number: No. 06-13500
Parties: James D. DAVIS, Kenneth Durden, Carl Morrow, Rex Wamer, Jason Stribling, Anthony Logan, Richard Carignan, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Kyle Mackenzie, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF LOGANVILLE, Georgia, a municipal corporation, Defendant-Appellee, James D. Bright, Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 221
Pages: 897–898

Head Matter:
James D. DAVIS, Kenneth Durden, Carl Morrow, Rex Wamer, Jason Stribling, Anthony Logan, Richard Carignan, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Kyle Mackenzie, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF LOGANVILLE, Georgia, a municipal corporation, Defendant-Appellee, James D. Bright, Defendant.
No. 06-13500.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
March 28, 2007.
James L. Stine, Elizabeth K. Dorminey, Wimberly, Lawson, Steckel, Nelson & Schneider, P.C., Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
Jason D. Sammis, Cruser & Mitchell, LLP, Tampa, FL, Robyn Oliver Webb, Crnser & Mitchell, LLP, Norcross, GA, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges, and BARZILAY, Judge.
Honorable Judith M. Barzilay, Judge, United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
After review and oral argument, we affirm the March 27, 2006 and May 11, 2006 orders of the district court that, taken together, grant summary judgment in favor of the defendant-appellee on all of the plaintiffs-appellants' claims. We affirm for the reasons outlined in these two thorough orders entered by the district court.
AFFIRMED.