Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ruben Restrepo, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1990-09-17
Citations: 165 A.D.2d 838
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ruben Restrepo, Appellant.
Judges: Thompson, J. P., Brown, Balletta and Miller, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 165
Pages: 838–838

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ruben Restrepo, Appellant.

Opinion:
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Starkey, J.), imposed June 8, 1988.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
A fair reading of the sentence minutes does not support the defendant's contention that the sentencing court improperly took into consideration a charge of which the defendant had been acquitted in imposing sentence (cf., People v Villanueva, 144 AD2d 285; People v Coward, 100 AD2d 628). Moreover, we conclude that the sentence imposed was not unduly harsh or excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
Thompson, J. P., Brown, Balletta and Miller, JJ., concur.