Case Name: Daniel Hubert ROSS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARYLAND STATE POLICE LICENSING DIVISION, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-11-29
Citations: 671 F. App'x 82
Docket Number: No. 16-1809
Parties: Daniel Hubert ROSS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARYLAND STATE POLICE LICENSING DIVISION, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 671
Pages: 82–82

Head Matter:
Daniel Hubert ROSS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARYLAND STATE POLICE LICENSING DIVISION, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 16-1809
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: November 22, 2016
Decided: November 29, 2016
Daniel Hubert Ross, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Holdsworth Bowen, Assistant Attorney General, Pikesville, Maryland, for Ap-pellee.
Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Daniel Hubert Ross appeals the district court's orders granting Defendant's motion to dismiss and denying Ross leave .to amend his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Ross v. Md. State Police Licensing Div., No. 8:15-cv-01402-TDC, 2016 WL 1161078 (D. Md. Mar. 23, 2016 & June 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. .
DISMISSED