Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HAO QUANG TRAN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-10-23
Citations: 586 F.3d 681
Docket Number: No. 07-30270
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HAO QUANG TRAN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: HARRY PREGERSON, WILLIAM C. CANBY, JR. and JOHN T. NOONAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 586
Pages: 681–682

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HAO QUANG TRAN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-30270.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Oct. 23, 2009.
Helen J. Brunner, Esquire, Susan M. Roe, Catherine Lynskey Crisham, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
John Dorgan, Esquire, Allen M. Ressler, Ressler & Tesh PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: HARRY PREGERSON, WILLIAM C. CANBY, JR. and JOHN T. NOONAN, Circuit Judges.
Order; Dissent by Judge GOULD.

Opinion:
ORDER
A judge of this court sua sponte called for this case to be reheard en banc. A vote was taken, and a majority of the active judges of the court did not vote for a rehearing en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35(f). The call for this case to be reheard en banc is DENIED.