Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Alonzo Maupin, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1993-11-01
Citations: 198 A.D.2d 236
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alonzo Maupin, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 198
Pages: 236–236

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alonzo Maupin, Appellant.
[604 NYS2d 801]

Opinion:
—Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Leis, J.), both rendered September 10, 1992, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree under Superior Court Information No. 963/92 and criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree under Superior Court Information No. 952/ 92, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.
Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.
Since the defendant did not raise any issue concerning the validity of his post-plea arrest, or deny any involvement in the underlying crime, the court did not err in failing to conduct an inquiry into the matter. Thus, it was proper for the court to impose enhanced sentences (see, People v Outley, 80 NY2d 702; People v Ayers, 192 AD2d 1134). The defendant's contention that the court should have afforded him an opportunity to withdraw his pleas is without merit (cf., People v White, 144 AD2d 711; People v Rosa, 194 AD2d 755).
The defendant's sentences were not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Miller, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.