Case Name: FIGURE FLATTERY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1990-07-11
Citations: 907 F.2d 141
Docket Number: No. 90-1079
Parties: FIGURE FLATTERY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before NIES, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, Circuit Judge, and BROWNING, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 907
Pages: 141–141

Head Matter:
FIGURE FLATTERY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 90-1079.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
July 11, 1990.
Ned H. Marshak, Sharretts, Paley, Carter & Blauvelt, P.C., of New York City, argued, for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Gail T. Cumins.
Saul Davis, Trial Atty., Intern. Trade Field Office, Dept, of Justice, of New York City, argued, for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were Stuart M. Gerson, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director and Joseph I. Liebman, Atty. in Charge.
Before NIES, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, Circuit Judge, and BROWNING, District Judge.
The Honorable William D. Browning, United States District Court for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 293(a).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The decision of the United States Court of International Trade, Figure Flattery, Inc. v. United States, 720 F.Supp. 1008 (Ct.Int'l Trade 1989), is affirmed. We adopt that court's opinion.
AFFIRMED.