Case Name: In re William A. BOOTHE, M.D. and Wendy J. Boothe, Relators
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 2013-02-22
Citations: 395 S.W.3d 393
Docket Number: No. 05-13-00198-CV
Parties: In re William A. BOOTHE, M.D. and Wendy J. Boothe, Relators.
Judges: Before Justices BRIDGES, MURPHY and LEWIS.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 395
Pages: 393–394

Head Matter:
In re William A. BOOTHE, M.D. and Wendy J. Boothe, Relators.
No. 05-13-00198-CV.
Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.
Feb. 22, 2013.
James W. Grau, Stephen F. Malouf, Jonathan Nockels, Dallas, for Appellant.
Brian P. Lauten and Charla Aldous, Dallas, for Appellees.
Before Justices BRIDGES, MURPHY and LEWIS.

Opinion:
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice LEWIS.
Relators contend the trial judge erred in dissolving a writ of garnishment. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them here in. Based on the record before us, we conclude relators have not shown they are entitled to the relief requested. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex.1992) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY rela-tors' petition for writ of mandamus and emergency motion to stay.