Case Name: LARGE v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1916-03-08
Citations: 184 S.W. 197
Docket Number: No. 3975
Parties: LARGE v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 184
Pages: 197–197

Head Matter:
LARGE v. STATE.
(No. 3975.)
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
March 8, 1916.)
Criminal Law <&wkey;1090(l) — Questions Presented fob Review.
Where there was nothing in a motion for new trial that could be considered in the absence of the testimony, and neither a statement of facts nor a bill of exceptions was in the record, there was nothing to review on appeal.
[Ed. Note. — For other cases, -see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2653, 2807, 3204; Dec. Dig. &wkey;1090(l).]
Appeal from Dallas County Court, at Law; T. A. Work, Judge.
Charley Large was convicted of aggravated assault, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
C. C. McDonald, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Opinion:
DAYIDSON, J.
Appellant was convicted of aggravated assault; his punishment being assessed at a fine of $25.
There is nothing in the motion for new trial that can be considered in the absence of the testimony, and nothing presented by bill of exceptions. In fact, there is neither a statement of the facts nor a bill of exceptions in the record.
There being nothing to review in this appeal, the judgment will be affirmed.