Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Dwayne CALDWELL, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-04-27
Citations: 989 S.W.2d 265
Docket Number: No. 74427
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Dwayne CALDWELL, Appellant.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., C.J., and KENT E. KAROHL, J., and ROBERT E. CRIST, Senior Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 989
Pages: 265–265

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Dwayne CALDWELL, Appellant.
No. 74427.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
April 27, 1999.
Mary S. Choi, Lisa Stroup, Asst. Public Defenders, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Wade Thomas, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., C.J., and KENT E. KAROHL, J., and ROBERT E. CRIST, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Caldwell appeals from judgment of conviction by a jury of one count of possession of a controlled substance in violation of Section 196.202, RSMo 1994. Caldwell was sentenced to four years' imprisonment. Caldwell contends the trial court erred in overruling his motion to quash three of the State's peremptory strikes. Caldwell further requests plain error review regarding the admittance of State's evidence because adequate chain of custody was not established. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).