Case Name: Charles F. MacQUEEN, Petitioner, v. BERLO VENDING COMPANY et al., Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1964-09-23
Citations: 167 So. 2d 568
Docket Number: No. 33467
Parties: Charles F. MacQUEEN, Petitioner, v. BERLO VENDING COMPANY et al., Respondents.
Judges: DREW, C. J., and THORNAL, O’CON-NELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 167
Pages: 568–569

Head Matter:
Charles F. MacQUEEN, Petitioner, v. BERLO VENDING COMPANY et al., Respondents.
No. 33467.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Sept. 23, 1964.
Alfred D. Bieley, Miami, for petitioner.
Cosgrove, Rose & Marlow, Miami, for Berio Vending Co. and Michigan Mutual Liability Co.
Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for Florida Industrial Commission.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date March 18, 1964.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.
DREW, C. J., and THORNAL, O'CON-NELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.