Case Name: Burnett Associates, Ltd., Appellant, v. Robert Van Winkle, Doing Business as Protdec, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1982-12-17
Citations: 91 A.D.2d 869
Docket Number: 
Parties: Burnett Associates, Ltd., Appellant, v Robert Van Winkle, Doing Business as Protdec, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 91
Pages: 869–869

Head Matter:
Burnett Associates, Ltd., Appellant, v Robert Van Winkle, Doing Business as Protdec, Respondent.

Opinion:
— Order unanimously affirmed, without costs (see Eaton v Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of U. S.. 81 AD2d 653, revd 56 NY2d 900). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Murphy, J. — vacate default.) Present — Simons, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Callahan, Denman and Schnepp, JJ.