Case Name: Janece P. MICKENS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INTELLIGENT DECISIONS, INC.; Zaman Khan; Theresa Pond; Susan Mayer, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-07-27
Citations: 610 F. App'x 300
Docket Number: No. 15-1381
Parties: Janece P. MICKENS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INTELLIGENT DECISIONS, INC.; Za-man Khan; Theresa Pond; Susan Mayer, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 610
Pages: 300–300

Head Matter:
Janece P. MICKENS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INTELLIGENT DECISIONS, INC.; Za-man Khan; Theresa Pond; Susan Mayer, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15-1381.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 23, 2015.
Decided: July 27, 2015.
Janece P. Mickens, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Nicholas Petkovich, Amanda Vac-caro, Jackson Lewis PC, Reston, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.:
Janece Mickens appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her civil complaint for failure to prosecute. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Mickens leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mickens v. Intelligent Decisions, Inc., No. 1:14-cv-01486-AJT-TCB (E.D.Va. Mar. 17, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.