Case Name: Bobby BOSTIC, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-02-08
Citations: 10 S.W.3d 607
Docket Number: No. ED 75939
Parties: Bobby BOSTIC, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, Jr., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J. and ROBERT E. CRIST, Sr. J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 10
Pages: 607–607

Head Matter:
Bobby BOSTIC, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 75939.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Feb. 8, 2000.
Douglas R. Hoff, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Andrea L. Mazza, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, Jr., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J. and ROBERT E. CRIST, Sr. J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Bobby Bostic (movant) appeals the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the determination of the trial court was not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).