Case Name: Jesus SARMIENTO-HERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-04-10
Citations: 176 F. App'x 730
Docket Number: No. 04-74150
Parties: Jesus SARMIENTO-HERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 176
Pages: 730–730

Head Matter:
Jesus SARMIENTO-HERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 04-74150.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 5, 2006.
Filed April 10, 2006.
Bita L. Hoffman, San Diego, CA, for Petitioner.
CAS-District Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Diego, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Judith E. Levy, Esq., USD-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Detroit, MI, for Respondent.
Before: HAWKINS, MeKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Jesus Sarmiento-Hernandez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") decision summarily affirming without opinion an immigration judge's order denying his motion to reopen proceedings in which he was ordered removed in absentia. We lack jurisdiction because the petition for review was untimely and therefore dismiss the petition.
The BIA's decision was issued on July 19, 2004. This court received Sarmiento-Hernandez's petition for review on August 19, 2004, thirty-one days later. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1) states: "The petition for review must be filed not later than 30 days after the date of the final order of removal." Sarmiento-Hernandez's petition should therefore have been received no later than August 18, 2004. See Sheviakov v. INS, 237 F.3d 1144, 1148 (9th Cir.2001).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.