Case Name: Arthur E. MATHIESON, Petitioner, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION of Arizona, Respondent, Sahuaro Petroleum & Asphalt Co., Respondent Employer, Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, (Underwriters Adjusting Company), Respondent Carrier
Court: Arizona Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Arizona
Decision Date: 1973-07-31
Citations: 20 Ariz. App. 325
Docket Number: No. 1 CA-IC 731
Parties: Arthur E. MATHIESON, Petitioner, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION of Arizona, Respondent, Sahuaro Petroleum & Asphalt Co., Respondent Employer, Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, (Underwriters Adjusting Company), Respondent Carrier.
Judges: JACOBSON, Chief Judge, Division 1, and EUBANK, P. J., concur.
Reporter: Arizona Appeals Reports
Volume: 20
Pages: 325–325

Head Matter:
512 P.2d 857
Arthur E. MATHIESON, Petitioner, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION of Arizona, Respondent, Sahuaro Petroleum & Asphalt Co., Respondent Employer, Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, (Underwriters Adjusting Company), Respondent Carrier.
No. 1 CA-IC 731.
Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B.
July 31, 1973.
Rehearing Denied Oct. 22, 1973.
Review Granted Nov. 27, 1973.
Gorey & Ely by Stephen S. Gorey, Phoenix, for petitioner.
William C. Wahl, Jr., Chief Counsel, The Industrial Commission of Ariz., Phoenix, for respondent.
O’Connor, Cavanagh, Anderson, West-over, Killingsworth & Beshears by Donald L. Cross, Phoenix, for respondent carrier.

Opinion:
HAIRE, Judge.
On this review of an award entered by the respondent Commission in a workmen's compensation proceeding, the petitioning workman contends that an injury to his shoulder which left him with a residual impairment constituting a 20% functional loss of use of the left arm should have been treated as an unscheduled disability. We have reviewed the record and find that the evidence supports the scheduled award entered by the Commission. See Arnott v. Industrial Commission, 103 Ariz. 182, 438 P.2d 419 (1968); Bradley v. Industrial Commission, 13 Ariz.App. 204, 475 P.2d 296 (1970); Heredia v. Industrial Commission, 10 Ariz.App. 507, 460 P.2d 43 (1969); Pena v. Industrial Commission, 10 Ariz. App. 573, 460 P.2d 1002 (1969).
The award is affirmed.
JACOBSON, Chief Judge, Division 1, and EUBANK, P. J., concur.