Case Name: Willis CASTO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-11-03
Citations: 670 F. App'x 119
Docket Number: No. 15-2280
Parties: Willis CASTO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before KING, DUNCAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 670
Pages: 119–120

Head Matter:
Willis CASTO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 15-2280
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: August 18, 2016
Decided: November 3, 2016
Timothy J. Mummert, Timothy J. Mum-mert, P.A., Glen Burnie, Maryland, for Appellant. Charles S. Hirsch, Ballard Spahr, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Ap-pellee.
Before KING, DUNCAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Willis Casto appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Wells Fargo Bank as to each of his claims in his civil complaint. We have reviewed the materials before the court, including the parties' briefs, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Casto v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 1:13-cv-01142-GLR (D. Md. Sept. 23, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED