Case Name: John Cleary, Respondent, v. F. A. Feyl, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1929-03
Citations: 226 A.D. 706
Docket Number: 
Parties: John Cleary, Respondent, v. F. A. Feyl, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 226
Pages: 706–706

Head Matter:
John Cleary, Respondent, v. F. A. Feyl, Appellant.

Opinion:
—Judgment affirmed, with costs. Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman, Davis and Hasbrouck, JJ., concur; Hill, J., dissents on the ground that the presumption that defendant's car was being used with his consent, express or implied, disappeared in the face of substantial evidence to the contrary. (Potts v. Pardee, 220 N. Y. 431.)