Case Name: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BY THE COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ETHEL W. PROBASCO, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1971-05-24
Citations: 58 N.J. 372
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BY THE COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ETHEL W. PROBASCO, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 58
Pages: 372–373

Head Matter:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BY THE COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ETHEL W. PROBASCO, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Argued May 10, 1971
Decided May 24, 1971.
Mr. Ralph S. Heuser, Jr., argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. Heuser & Heuser, attorneys).
Mr. David A. Biederman, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. George F. Kugler, Jr., Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion in the Appellate Division, 114 N. J. Super. 546 (1970).
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Erancis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Mountain — 7.
For reversal — Hone.