Case Name: Gregory V. SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. P.E. SPIVEY, Jail Director, Individual and Official capacity; Chris Phillips, Detective, Individual and Official capacity, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-11-08
Citations: 546 F. App'x 174
Docket Number: No. 13-6586
Parties: Gregory V. SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. P.E. SPIVEY, Jail Director, Individual and Official capacity; Chris Phillips, Detective, Individual and Official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before AGEE, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 546
Pages: 174–175

Head Matter:
Gregory V. SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. P.E. SPIVEY, Jail Director, Individual and Official capacity; Chris Phillips, Detective, Individual and Official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 13-6586.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 28, 2013.
Decided: Nov. 8, 2013.
Gregory V. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel C. Plyler, Davidson & Lindemann, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appel-lees.
Before AGEE, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Gregory V. Smith appeals the district court's orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Spivey, No. 1:12-cv-00029-RBH (D.S.C. Feb. 27 & Apr. 15, 2018). We deny the motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.