Case Name: Charles B. JERNIGAN, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2004-08-20
Citations: 884 So. 2d 309
Docket Number: No. 2D03-2746
Parties: Charles B. JERNIGAN, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: FULMER, SILBERMAN, and KELLY, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 884
Pages: 309–309

Head Matter:
Charles B. JERNIGAN, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D03-2746.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Aug. 20, 2004.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Deana K. Marshall, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Dale E. Tarpley, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appel-lee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Charles Jernigan appeals the revocation of his probation for nine violations. We affirm the revocation but remand for correction of the written revocation order. The trial court did not find that Jernigan violated condition (6) of his probation; however, the written order of revocation listed condition (6) as one of the bases for revocation. It is well-settled that the written order of revocation must conform to the oral pronouncements made at the revocation hearing. See Williams v. State, 764 So.2d 757, 758 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). Accordingly, we remand with directions that the order of revocation be corrected to conform to the trial court's oral pronouncement.
Affirmed in part; remanded with directions.
FULMER, SILBERMAN, and KELLY, JJ., Concur.