Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pedro ARMENTA-VALENTIN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-06-20
Citations: 185 F. App'x 389
Docket Number: No. 05-40159
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pedro ARMENTA-VALENTIN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 185
Pages: 389–389

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pedro ARMENTA-VALENTIN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-40159
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
June 20, 2006.
James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, Mark Michael Dowd, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Brownsville, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Molly E. Odom, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Pedro Armenta-Valentin (Armenta) pleaded guilty to illegal reentry following deportation, pursuant to a plea agreement that contained a waiver-of-appeal provision. We need not decide the applicability of the waiver provision in this case because the issue that Armenta raises is foreclosed.
Armenta argues that the district court erred by ordering him to cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample as a condition of supervised release. This claim is not ripe for review on direct appeal. See United States v. Riascos-Cuenu, 428 F.3d 1100, 1101-02 (5th Cir.2005), petition for cert. filed (Jan. 9, 2006) (No. 05-8662). The appeal is DISMISSED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.