Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos Ernest COWARD, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-04-02
Citations: 516 F. App'x 279
Docket Number: No. 13-6009
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos Ernest COWARD, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 516
Pages: 279–280

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos Ernest COWARD, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-6009.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 28, 2013.
Decided: April 2, 2013.
Carlos Ernest Coward, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Carlos Ernest Coward appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reconsideration of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Coward, No. 7:07-cr-00069- GEC-3 (W.D.Va. Dec. 5, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.