Case Name: UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee v. Daniel Flores REYDONDO Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-10-11
Citations: 698 F. App'x 327
Docket Number: No. 17-1903
Parties: UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee v. Daniel Flores REYDONDO Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before WOLLMAN, GRUENDER, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 698
Pages: 327–327

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee v. Daniel Flores REYDONDO Defendant-Appellant
No. 17-1903
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: October 5, 2017
Filed: October 11, 2017
John E. Beamer, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Des Moines, IA, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Daniel Flores Reydondo, Pro Se
Before WOLLMAN, GRUENDER, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Daniel Flores Reydondo directly appeals after he pled guilty to an immigration offense and the district court sentenced him to a prison term at the high end of the calculated guidelines range. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw and has ñled a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), arguing that the sentence is unreasonable.
Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not impose an unreasonable sentence. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (discussing appellate review of sentencing decisions; if sentence is within guidelines range, appellate court may, but is not required to, apply presumption of reasonableness). In addition, having independently reviewed the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw, and we affirm.
. The Honorable Rebecca Ebinger, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.