Case Name: RULE-DALE ENTERPRISES, INC., dba CONTINENTAL LEASING, Appellant, v. MICHAEL G. KOZLOWSKI, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada
Jurisdiction: Nevada
Decision Date: 1984-01-25
Citations: 100 Nev. 53
Docket Number: No. 14784
Parties: RULE-DALE ENTERPRISES, INC., dba CONTINENTAL LEASING, Appellant, v. MICHAEL G. KOZLOWSKI, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Nevada Reports
Volume: 100
Pages: 53–54

Head Matter:
RULE-DALE ENTERPRISES, INC., dba CONTINENTAL LEASING, Appellant, v. MICHAEL G. KOZLOWSKI, Respondent.
No. 14784
January 25, 1984
675 P.2d 994
Laurence A. Lacey, Minden, for Appellant.
Victor G. Drakulich, Reno, for Respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION
Per Curiam:
This is an appeal from a summary judgment denying the plaintiff a deficiency judgment. Appellant contends that it is excepted from the notice requirements for establishing a vehicle's residual value because the lease involved in the present case provides for an alternative method of determining residual value under NRS 100.145(1). We disagree.
NRS 100.145(1) provides a statutory method of establishing a vehicle's residual value where the parties have not otherwise agreed in writing on that value or upon another method of establishing that value. It is apparent that the legislature did not intend for the original lease to be substituted as an agreement between the parties for determining residual value. Such agreements refer only to writings executed by the parties after the lease has gone into effect.
Since the lessor has failed to notify the lessee of its intention to establish residual value as required by NRS 100.155, the lessor is precluded from recovering any deficiency. NRS 100.175. We affirm the district court's granting of the summary judgment.