Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio RODRIGUEZ-PRECIADO, aka Tony Rodriguez-Preciado, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-07-29
Citations: 416 F.3d 939
Docket Number: No. 03-30285
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio RODRIGUEZ-PRECIADO, aka Tony Rodriguez-Preciado, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WALLACE, GOULD, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 416
Pages: 939–940

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio RODRIGUEZ-PRECIADO, aka Tony Rodriguez-Preciado, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 03-30285.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Sept. 13, 2004.
Filed March 4, 2005.
Amended July 29, 2005.
James F. Halley, Portland, OR, for the defendant-appellant.
Karin J. Immergut, United States Attorney, and J. Russell Ratto, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Portland, OR, for the plaintiff-appellee.
Before WALLACE, GOULD, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
The court's majority opinion filed March 4, 2005, slip op. 2539, and appearing at 399 F.3d 1118 (9th Cir.2005), is hereby amended as follows:
1. On page 2544, line 9, replace "We affirm." with "We affirm, but issue a limited remand pursuant to United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc)."
2. On page 2562, line 3, delete "AFFIRMED" and add a new Section V reading as follows:
We now address the impact of the recent en banc decision in United States v. Ame line, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc) on this case. Because we cannot "reliably determine from the record whether the sentence imposed would have been materially different had the district court known that the Guidelines were advisory, we will remand to the sentencing court to answer that question." Id. at 1084. The mandate shall issue forthwith.
AFFIRMED IN PART, REMANDED IN PART.