Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony Dale NORRIS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-03-05
Citations: 314 F. App'x 622
Docket Number: No. 08-8583
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Anthony Dale NORRIS, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 314
Pages: 622–623

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Anthony Dale NORRIS, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 08-8583.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 20, 2009.
Decided: March 5, 2009.
Anthony Dale Norris, Appellant Pro Se. Leesa Washington, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Dale Norris appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Norris, No. 6:05-cr-01163-HMH-3 (D.S.C. Nov. 20, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.