Case Name: Timothy B. DAY, Appellant, v. Mary L. DAY, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-02-20
Citations: 574 So. 2d 324
Docket Number: No. 90-1786
Parties: Timothy B. DAY, Appellant, v. Mary L. DAY, Appellee.
Judges: HERSEY, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and WARNER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 574
Pages: 324–324

Head Matter:
Timothy B. DAY, Appellant, v. Mary L. DAY, Appellee.
No. 90-1786.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb. 20, 1991.
Peter Grable of William Lasley Law Offices, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Kalman H. Gerb of Kalman H. Gerb, P.A., Lake Worth, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The trial court did not err in considering the former husband's disability benefits when determining that he did in fact have the ability to comply with both the previous judgments and orders of the court and the purge provision of the contempt order. Mims v. Mims, 442 So.2d 102 (Ala.Civ.App.1983); Riley v. Riley, 82 Md.App. 400, 571 A.2d 1261, 1266, cert. denied, 320 Md. 222, 577 A.2d 50 (1990); Christmas v. Christmas, 787 P.2d 1267, 1268 (Okla.1990); Murphy v. Murphy, 302 Ark. 157, 787 S.W.2d 684, 685 (1990). Accordingly, we affirm.
HERSEY, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and WARNER, JJ., concur.