Case Name: McTIGUE et v. McTIGUE et
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1929-03-11
Citations: 7 Ohio Law Abs. 245
Docket Number: No 9972
Parties: McTIGUE et v McTIGUE et
Judges: Judges WILLIAMS & RICHARDS of the Sixth Dist sitting.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 7
Pages: 245–245

Head Matter:
McTIGUE et v McTIGUE et
Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist, Cuyahoga Co
No 9972.
Decided Mar 11, 1929
Dunlap, Stephens & Stephens and John J Moore, all of Cleveland, for Plaintiffs in error.
Vickery and Vickery, Cleveland, for defendants in error.
Judges WILLIAMS & RICHARDS of the Sixth Dist sitting.

Opinion:
BY THE COURT.
We think, construing the terms of the certificate fairly, that these provisions became binding upon the parties and rendered effective and applicable to the beneficiary certificate the amendment which was made to the by-laws. John J. McTigue, after the amendment was adopted, not having made any further disposition of the proceeds of the certificate or designation of beneficiary, the amendment became operative and by its terms the amount is made payable to the children.
For this reason the judgment should be affirmed.
Williams and Richards, JJ, concur. Lloyd, J, not participating.