Case Name: Cooper et al., Board of County Commissioners of Mahoning County, v. Bradlyn; City of Youngstown v. Bradlyn
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1931-03-25
Citations: 123 Ohio St. 392
Docket Number: Nos. 22606 and 22608
Parties: Cooper et al., Board of County Commissioners of Mahoning County, v. Bradlyn. City of Youngstown v. Bradlyn.
Judges: Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Aleen, Kinkade and Robinson, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, New Service
Volume: 123
Pages: 392–393

Head Matter:
Cooper et al., Board of County Commissioners of Mahoning County, v. Bradlyn. City of Youngstown v. Bradlyn.
(Nos. 22606 and 22608
Decided March 25, 1931.)
Mr. R. L. Thomas and Mr. J. S. Cooper, for plaintiffs in error in Cause No. 22606.
Mr. Carl Armstrong and Mr. H. H. Wickham, for plaintiff in error in Cause No. 22608.
Mr. Morris Mendelssohn and Mr. Edward L. Williams, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
By the Court.
Abraham Bradlyn sued the city and the board of county commissioners in the same action, seeking damages for personal injuries. He recovered judgment against both defendants. After a remittitur of a part of the trial court's judgment had been made and consented to, the Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of the lower court. Thereupon the cause came to this court upon error.
"We find no abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court in permitting the plaintiff below to file his second amended petition at the beginning of the trial. The plaintiff, in his pleading, alleged that he suffered his injuries by reason of the negligence of-the defendants in not keeping a sidewalk in repair in permitting a sheet-iron or metal strip to so pro trude from two to six inches above the level of a sidewalk as to cause him to stumble and fall. This metal strip overlaid a concrete sidewalk which ran lengthwise over the bridge and was used by the traveling public. The concrete sidewalk and the superimposed strip were a part of the bridge.
Since the sidewalk, including the metal strip, was a part of the bridge superstructure, the legal principles announced in City of Youngstown v. Sturgess, 102 Ohio St., 480, 132 N. E., 17, apply, and both cases will be affirmed on authority of that case.
Judgments affirmed.
Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Aleen, Kinkade and Robinson, JJ., concur.