Case Name: HILL, Respondent v. LAMPERT LUMBER COMPANY et al., Appellants
Court: South Dakota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: South Dakota
Decision Date: 1960-03-02
Citations: 78 S.D. 293
Docket Number: File No. 9767
Parties: HILL, Respondent v. LAMPERT LUMBER COMPANY et al., Appellants
Judges: 
Reporter: South Dakota Reports
Volume: 78
Pages: 293–293

Head Matter:
HILL, Respondent v. LAMPERT LUMBER COMPANY et al., Appellants
(101 N.W.2d 396)
(File No. 9767.
Opinion filed March 2, 1960)
Gunderson, Farrar & Carrell, Rapid City, for Defendants and Appellants.
Burnell Hendricksen and Roswell Bottum, Rapid City, for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
For our purposes this suit is similar to Holzworth v. Roth, 78 S.D. 287, 101 N.W.2d 393. While it involves a different lot, a different series of deeds with a different ultimate grantee and an action to foreclose different mechanics liens, it presents in the same circumstances the legal issue of whether a suit in equity will lie. This matter is governed by the opinion in Holzworth v. Roth, supra. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is reversed.