Case Name: AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED ARTISTS PAYPHONE CORPORATION, United Artists Telecommunications, Inc., UA/Ranlee Joint Venture & UA/Ranlee, Inc., Defendants-Appellants, Ranlee Communications, Inc., Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1994-11-04
Citations: 39 F.3d 411
Docket Number: No. 762, Docket 94-7616
Parties: AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED ARTISTS PAYPHONE CORPORATION, United Artists Telecommunications, Inc., UA/Ranlee Joint Venture & UA/Ranlee, Inc., Defendants-Appellants, Ranlee Communications, Inc., Defendant.
Judges: Before: MESKILL, WINTER, and MAHONEY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 39
Pages: 411–411

Head Matter:
AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED ARTISTS PAYPHONE CORPORATION, United Artists Telecommunications, Inc., UA/Ranlee Joint Venture & UA/Ranlee, Inc., Defendants-Appellants, Ranlee Communications, Inc., Defendant.
No. 762, Docket 94-7616.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued Nov. 2, 1994.
Decided Nov. 4, 1994.
Robert M. Peak, New York City (Jeffrey N. Leibell, Reboul, MacMurray, Hewitt, Maynard & Kristol, of counsel), for defendants-appellants.
Peter J. McHugh, New York City (Martin Domb, Hill, Betts & Nash, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellee.
Before: MESKILL, WINTER, and MAHONEY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
We affirm for substantially the reasons stated by Judge Leisure. American Tel. & Tel. Co. v. United Artists Payphone Corp., 852 F.Supp. 221 (S.D.N.Y.1994).