Case Name: FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Petitioner, v. Earl L. STAGER, Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1966-08-02
Citations: 189 So. 2d 194
Docket Number: No. 66-118
Parties: FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Petitioner, v. Earl L. STAGER, Respondent.
Judges: . Before HENDRY, C. J., and CARROLL and SWANN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 189
Pages: 194–194

Head Matter:
FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Petitioner, v. Earl L. STAGER, Respondent.
No. 66-118.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District
Aug. 2, 1966.
Bolles, Goodwin & Ryskamp, Miami, for petitioner.
Frates, Fay, Floyd & Pearson and Larry Stewart, Miami, for respondent.
. Before HENDRY, C. J., and CARROLL and SWANN, JJ.

Opinion:
HENDRY, Chief Judge.
The issues raised by the petition for writ of certiorari were decided in our decision filed on this date, August 2, 1966, Stager v. Florida East Coast Railway Company, Fla.App.1966, 189 So.2d 192.
Certiorari does not lie to review an order if. there is any other adequate remedy. Fort v. Fort, Fla.App.1958, 104 So.2d 69.
Accordingly, petition for writ of certio-rari is denied.