Case Name: John WALL, Appellant/cross-appellee, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/cross-appellant
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-03-17
Citations: 615 So. 2d 822
Docket Number: No. 91-1658
Parties: John WALL, Appellant/cross-appellee, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/cross-appellant.
Judges: STONE and FARMER, JJ., and WALDEN, JAMES H., Senior Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 615
Pages: 822–822

Head Matter:
John WALL, Appellant/cross-appellee, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/cross-appellant.
No. 91-1658.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
March 17, 1993.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Cherry Grant, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant/cross-ap-pellee.
David H. Bludworth, State Atty., and Robert S. Jaegers, Asst. State Atty., West Palm Beach, for appellee/cross-appellant.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The State concedes that Appellant s right to confront witnesses was violated by the introduction of a deposition to perpetuate testimony at which Appellant was not present. Brown v. State, 471 So.2d 6 (Fla.1985). Its use constitutes fundamental error. Regarding the other issue raised, we find no error in the denial of Appellant's motion for judgment of acquittal.
We reverse and remand for a new trial.
STONE and FARMER, JJ., and WALDEN, JAMES H., Senior Judge, concur.