Case Name: GALLIGAN et al., Appellants, v. GROTEN, Respondent
Court: New York City Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1896-04-27
Citations: 38 N.Y.S. 1144
Docket Number: 
Parties: GALLIGAN et al., Appellants, v. GROTEN, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 38
Pages: 1144–1144

Head Matter:
GALLIGAN et al., Appellants, v. GROTEN, Respondent.
(City Court of New York, General Term.
April 27, 1896.)
Action by James J. Galligan and others against Rodger C. Groten. T. E. Murray, for appellants. Rabe & Keller, for respondent.

Opinion:
FITZSIMONS, J.
There is not a single fact alleged in the affidavits upon which the attachment herein was granted that shows that the defendant was about to assign, dispose of, or secrete his property with the intent to hinder, delay, and defraud his creditors (the ground upon which the same was issued). The attachment was therefore rightfully vacated, and the order appended from must be affirmed, with costs.