Case Name: Michael Robert PULIDO, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Chris CHRONES, Respondent-Appellant; Michael Robert Pulido, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Chris Chrones, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-03-20
Citations: 559 F.3d 1040
Docket Number: Nos. 05-15916, 05-16308
Parties: Michael Robert PULIDO, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Chris CHRONES, Respondent-Appellant. Michael Robert Pulido, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Chris Chrones, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before: ALFRED T. GOODWIN, DIARMUID F. O’SCANNLAIN, and SIDNEY R. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 559
Pages: 1040–1041

Head Matter:
Michael Robert PULIDO, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Chris CHRONES, Respondent-Appellant. Michael Robert Pulido, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Chris Chrones, Respondent-Appellee.
Nos. 05-15916, 05-16308.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
March 20, 2009.
J. Bradley O’Connell, First District Appellate Project, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner-Appellee.
Michael Robert Pulido, Corcoran, CA, pro se.
Jeremy E. Friedlander, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, for Respondenb-Appellant.
Before: ALFRED T. GOODWIN, DIARMUID F. O’SCANNLAIN, and SIDNEY R. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
In light of Hedgpeth v. Pulido, 555 U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 530, — L.Ed.2d — (2008), which vacated the judgment of this court, 487 F.3d 669, and remanded, we in turn remand this case to the district court for further proceedings in accordance with the Supreme Court's determination that the appropriate standard of review in a case under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 is harmless error, rather than structural error, when a jury is instructed on alternative theories of guilt.
REMANDED.