Case Name: Chukwuma E. AZUBUKO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA; The Eleventh Circuit, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-06-26
Citations: 231 F. App'x 230
Docket Number: No. 06-2337
Parties: Chukwuma E. AZUBUKO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA; The Eleventh Circuit, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 231
Pages: 230–230

Head Matter:
Chukwuma E. AZUBUKO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA; The Eleventh Circuit, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 06-2337.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 21, 2007.
Decided: June 26, 2007.
Chukwuma E. Azubuko, Appellant Pro Se. Joshua B. Royster, United States Department of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Chukwuma E. Azubuko appeals the district court's order denying his "Second Motion for Reconsideration." We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Azubuko's motion to reconsider. See United States v. Winestock, 340 F.3d 200, 204 (4th Cir.2003) (providing standard for Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motions); see also Bogart v. Chapell, 396 F.3d 548, 555 (4th Cir.2005) (providing standard for Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motions). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.