Case Name: Color Wheel, Inc., Appellant, v. Interstate Printing Company Inc., Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2001-03-01
Citations: 281 A.D.2d 161
Docket Number: 
Parties: Color Wheel, Inc., Appellant, v Interstate Printing Company Inc., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 281
Pages: 161–162

Head Matter:
Color Wheel, Inc., Appellant, v Interstate Printing Company Inc., Respondent.
[721 NYS2d 512]

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Lippmann, J.), entered June 14, 2000, which granted defendant's motion to vacate a default judgment in the amount of $116,405.31, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion denied and the judgment and restraining order reinstated.
In order to vacate the default judgment, defendant needed to establish both a reasonable excuse and a meritorious defense (see, Goncalves v Stuyvesant Dev. Assocs., 232 AD2d 275; Dimitratos v City of New York, 180 AD2d 414). It succeeded in the former, but failed as to the latter. Defendant's contention, that it withheld payment of monies concededly due and owing to plaintiff under their contract because plaintiff allegedly sought to steal future business from it, is no defense to plaintiff's breach of contract claim. The equitable doctrine of unclean hands does not bar plaintiff's recovery under these circumstances (see, 518 E. 80th St. Co. v Smith, 251 AD2d 215, 216). Concur—Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Tom, Wallach and Friedman, JJ.