Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael O. LOCKHART, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-01-28
Citations: 24 F. App'x 231
Docket Number: No. 01-7238
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael O. LOCKHART, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 24
Pages: 231–231

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael O. LOCKHART, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 01-7238.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 17, 2002.
Decided Jan. 28, 2002.
Michael O. Lockhart, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Jack Higdon, Jr., Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Michael O. Lockhart appeals the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Lockhart, Nos. CR-97-7V; CA-01-344-3-V (W.D.N.C. June 26, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.