Case Name: Gustavo CUELLAR-CAMARENA, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-05-18
Citations: 180 F. App'x 704
Docket Number: No. 04-76666
Parties: Gustavo CUELLAR-CAMARENA, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: B. FLETCHER, TROTT, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 180
Pages: 704–705

Head Matter:
Gustavo CUELLAR-CAMARENA, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 04-76666.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 15, 2006.
Filed May 18, 2006.
Gustavo Cuellar-Camarena, Anaheim, CA, pro se.
CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Stacy S. Paddack, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: B. FLETCHER, TROTT, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Gustavo Cuellar-Camarena, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' order affirming without opinion an immigration judge's ("U") order denying cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for substantial evidence, Moran v. Ashcroft, 395 F.3d 1089, 1091 (9th Cir.2005), we deny the petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the IJ's order denying cancellation of removal, because Cuellar-Camarena failed to establish the requisite good moral character and that he had not been convicted of certain crimes. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l)(B), (C) (to be eligible for cancellation of removal the applicant must establish good moral character as well as the absence of certain convictions). Because the foregoing was dispositive of Cuellar-Camarena's eligibility for relief, the IJ did not need to consider whether Cuellar-Camarena's children would experience exceptional and extremely unusual hardship.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.