Case Name: Henry POULSON and Norma Poulson, h/w, Edwin Miller and Ella Mae Miller, h/w, Richard Dizebba, Appellants, v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION, Johns-Manville Sales Corporation, Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., Forty-Eight Insulation, Inc., Nicolet, Inc., Pittsburgh-Corning Corporation, GAF Corporation, Owens-Illinois Glass Company, Unarco Industries, Inc., H.K. Porter Company, J.P. Stevens Company, Eagle-Picher Industries, Garlock, Inc., U.S. Rubber Company and Uni-Royal, Inc., Celotex Corporation, Pacor, Inc., Amatex Corporation, Asbestos Textile Institute, Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, Asten Hill Manufacturing Company, Keasby-Mattison Company and Keene Corporation, Appellees
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1995-04-06
Citations: 543 Pa. 2
Docket Number: No. 111 Eastern District Appeal Docket 1994
Parties: Henry POULSON and Norma Poulson, h/w, Edwin Miller and Ella Mae Miller, h/w, Richard Dizebba, Appellants, v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION, Johns-Manville Sales Corporation, Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., Forty-Eight Insulation, Inc., Nicolet, Inc., Pittsburgh-Corning Corporation, GAF Corporation, Owens-Illinois Glass Company, Unarco Industries, Inc., H.K. Porter Company, J.P. Stevens Company, Eagle-Picher Industries, Garlock, Inc., U.S. Rubber Company and Uni-Royal, Inc., Celotex Corporation, Pacor, Inc., Amatex Corporation, Asbestos Textile Institute, Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, Asten Hill Manufacturing Company, Keasby-Mattison Company and Keene Corporation, Appellees.
Judges: MONTEMURO, J., is sitting by designation.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 543
Pages: 2–3

Head Matter:
669 A.2d 875
Henry POULSON and Norma Poulson, h/w, Edwin Miller and Ella Mae Miller, h/w, Richard Dizebba, Appellants, v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION, Johns-Manville Sales Corporation, Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., Forty-Eight Insulation, Inc., Nicolet, Inc., Pittsburgh-Corning Corporation, GAF Corporation, Owens-Illinois Glass Company, Unarco Industries, Inc., H.K. Porter Company, J.P. Stevens Company, Eagle-Picher Industries, Garlock, Inc., U.S. Rubber Company and Uni-Royal, Inc., Celotex Corporation, Pacor, Inc., Amatex Corporation, Asbestos Textile Institute, Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, Asten Hill Manufacturing Company, Keasby-Mattison Company and Keene Corporation, Appellees.
No. 111 Eastern District Appeal Docket 1994.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
April 6, 1995.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 6th day of April, 1995, it appears from examination of the record that Keene Corporation was the only party defendant remaining in this matter when it came before the Superior Court and thereafter before this Court on Petition for Allowance of Appeal. Thus, the Order entered at No. 220 E.D. Allocatur Docket 1993 on December 21, 1994, staying the action as to Respondent Keene Corporation pursuant to the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 362, was in error insofar as it further granted the Petition for Allowance of Appeal as to the remaining parties. The December 21, 1994 Order at No. 220 E.D. Allocatur Docket 1993 is therefore corrected to read only that the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is stayed as to Respondent Keene Corporation pursu ant to the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 362. The docket for this appeal is closed.
MONTEMURO, J., is sitting by designation.