Case Name: Alice Cunningham, Appellant, v. Isidore L. Malbin et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1959-07-14
Citations: 8 A.D.2d 949
Docket Number: 
Parties: Alice Cunningham, Appellant, v. Isidore L. Malbin et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 8
Pages: 949–950

Head Matter:
Alice Cunningham, Appellant, v. Isidore L. Malbin et al., Respondents.

Opinion:
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the appeal is from an order which on reargument adhered to the original decision denying appellant's application for a preference under rule 9 of the- Kings County Supreme Court Trial Term Rules, unless she consent within a stated time to an ftTrn.minfl.tion by a physician to be designated by the court, in which event the decision on reargument will be held in abeyance. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. On the basis of the medical proof submitted on the application, a denial of a preference was warranted. In the circumstances, the conditional order appealed from was within the bounds of the court's discretion. Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldoek, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.