Case Name: Christian Lindig v. The State
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1926-10-06
Citations: 105 Tex. Crim. 125
Docket Number: No. 10241
Parties: Christian Lindig v. The State.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Criminal Reports
Volume: 105
Pages: 125–126

Head Matter:
Christian Lindig v. The State.
No. 10241.
Delivered October 6, 1926.
The opinion states the case.
No brief filed for appellant.
Sam D. Stinson, State’s Attorney, and Robert M. Lyles, Assistant State’s Attorney, for the State.

Opinion:
BERRY, Judge.
The offense charged is failure to dip cattle when notified so to do and the punishment assessed is a fine of §50.00.
The information on which this conviction is predicated is void and of no force and effect in that it charges that the appellant failed and refused to dip his cattle "after having been notified in writing so to do by a legally authorized and acting inspector duly appointed by the Live Stock Sanitary Commission of Texas." The statute provides that the Live Stock Sanitary Commission or its chairman, is authorized and empowered to direct in writing any person or persons, company or corporation owning, controlling or' caring for any cattle which are subject to be dipped, to dip said cattle. Art. 1508a, Vernon's Ann. Criminal Statutes of Texas.
A simple reading of the statute referred to seems to make it clear that the notice in writing can only be legally made by the Live Stock Sanitary Commission or by its chairman, and a notice given by an acting inspector is without authority of law and a failure to comply with the notice so given will not constitute an infraction of the statute.
For the reason that the information upon which this conviction is based is void, the judgment is reversed arid the cause dismissed.
Affirmed.
The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.