Case Name: Carl A. VAUGHAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gail LEWIS, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-08-20
Citations: 108 F. App'x 450
Docket Number: No. 03-17128
Parties: Carl A. VAUGHAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gail LEWIS, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before: PREGERSON and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges, and RHOADES, District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 108
Pages: 450–451

Head Matter:
Carl A. VAUGHAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gail LEWIS, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 03-17128.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 13, 2004.
Decided Aug. 20, 2004.
Caro Marks, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Sacramento, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.
Susan Orton, Office of the California Attorney General, Department of Justice, Sacramento, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.
Before: PREGERSON and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges, and RHOADES, District Judge.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
The Honorable John S. Rhoades, Senior Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
From the facts presented, a rational factfinder could easily have inferred that Vaughan entered the residence with intent to steal. Sufficient evidence therefore supported Vaughan's conviction of burglary beyond a reasonable doubt. See Davis v. Woodford, 333 F.3d 982, 992 (9th Cir.2003). Vaughan's due process rights were not violated.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.