Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Antoinette COLLINS, Appellant; Antoinette COLLINS, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1993-08-10
Citations: 858 S.W.2d 859
Docket Number: Nos. 60740, 63168
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Antoinette COLLINS, Appellant. Antoinette COLLINS, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 858
Pages: 859–859

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Antoinette COLLINS, Appellant. Antoinette COLLINS, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 60740, 63168.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Aug. 10, 1993.
Judith C. LaRose, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jennifer A. Glancy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant, Antoinette Collins, appeals from a judgment of conviction, after a jury trial, for stealing, third offense. She was sentenced as a persistent offender to imprisonment for ten years. Defendant also appeals from the denial of her Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing.
As to defendant's direct appeal, no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
The judgment of the trial court denying defendant's Rule 29.15 motion is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).