Case Name: Gregory A. RICHARDSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Virginia Parole Board; Warden of Sussex I State Prison, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-10-05
Citations: 332 F. App'x 930
Docket Number: No. 09-6248
Parties: Gregory A. RICHARDSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Virginia Parole Board; Warden of Sussex I State Prison, Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 332
Pages: 930–930

Head Matter:
Gregory A. RICHARDSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Virginia Parole Board; Warden of Sussex I State Prison, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 09-6248.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 29, 2009.
Decided: Oct. 5, 2009.
Gregory A. Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Gregory A. Richardson appeals the district court's order imposing a pre-filing injunction because of his frequent and frivolous legal actions. See Richardson v. Virginia Dep't of Corr., No. 3:07-cv-00514-REP (E.D.Va. Jan. 8, 2009). We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion in the district court's order. See In re Burnley, 988 F.2d 1, 3-4 (4th Cir.1992) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm and deny as moot Richardson's motion for bail or release pending appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.