Case Name: Arthur L. Andrews v. Guayaquil and Quito Railway Company et al.
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1906-06-25
Citations: 71 N.J. Eq. 768
Docket Number: 
Parties: Arthur L. Andrews v. Guayaquil and Quito Railway Company et al.
Judges: For affirmance—'The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Eeed, Trenohard, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray—13!
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 71
Pages: 768–769

Head Matter:
Arthur L. Andrews v. Guayaquil and Quito Railway Company et al.
[Argued June 22d, 1906.
Decided June 25th, 1906.]
On appeal of Robert C. Pruyn from an order of the court of chancery, advised by Vice-Chancellor Stevens, whose opinion is reported in i&9 N. J. Fq. (3 Robb.) 211.
Mr. Fdivin B. Williamson, for the appellant.
Mr. Charles L. Corbin, for the respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The order appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered in the court of chancery by Vice-Chancellor Stevens.
For affirmance—'The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Eeed, Trenohard, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray—13!
For reversal—None.