Case Name: SCHOONMAKER-CONNERS CO., Inc., v. ROSOFF ENGINEERING CO., Inc., et al.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1925-11-02
Citations: 10 F.2d 64
Docket Number: No. 60
Parties: SCHOONMAKER-CONNERS CO., Inc., v. ROSOFF ENGINEERING CO., Inc., et al.
Judges: Before HOUGH, MANTON, and HAND, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 10
Pages: 64–65

Head Matter:
SCHOONMAKER-CONNERS CO., Inc., v. ROSOFF ENGINEERING CO., Inc., et al.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
November 2, 1925.)
No. 60.
Macklin, Brown & Van Wyck, of New York City (Horace L. Cheyney, of New York City, of counsel), for Schoonmaker-Conners Co.
Lampke & Stein, of New York City (Chauneey E. Treadwell, of New York City, of counsel), for Rosoff Engineering Co.
Leslie & Alden, of New York City, for Walsh Engineering & Contracting Co.
Before HOUGH, MANTON, and HAND, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Decree affirmed, on the opinion of Ward, Circuit Judge, in the court below.