Case Name: Gerard J. ZELL, Appellant, v. Charles E. COBB, Jr., ARDC Corporation, f/k/a Arvida Corporation, Arvida Realty Sales, Inc., et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-09-17
Citations: 585 So. 2d 505
Docket Number: No. 90-2594
Parties: Gerard J. ZELL, Appellant, v. Charles E. COBB, Jr., ARDC Corporation, f/k/a Arvida Corporation, Arvida Realty Sales, Inc., et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before BASKIN, COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 585
Pages: 505–505

Head Matter:
Gerard J. ZELL, Appellant, v. Charles E. COBB, Jr., ARDC Corporation, f/k/a Arvida Corporation, Arvida Realty Sales, Inc., et al., Appellees.
No. 90-2594.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Sept. 17, 1991.
Kenny, Nachwalter, Seymour & Arnold, Thomas H. Seymour and Harry R. Schafer, Miami, for appellant.
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, James W. Beasley, Jr., Steven M. Katzman and Edward G. Case, Palm Beach, for appel-lees.
Before BASKIN, COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Gerard Zell appeals a cost judgment entered against him. He contends, and we agree, that the trial court erred insofar as it awarded costs for two demonstrative exhibits which were not used at trial. See Loftin v. Anderson, 66 So.2d 470, 472-73 (Fla.1953). We reverse and remand for reduction of the award accordingly. We are not persuaded that the trial court abused its discretion with regard to the remainder of the items disputed by Zell.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.