Case Name: Jeremiah F. MCMILLON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2016-06-21
Citations: 492 S.W.3d 629
Docket Number: No. ED 103258
Parties: Jeremiah F. MCMILLON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Philip M. Hess, P. J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J. and Angela T. Quigless, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 492
Pages: 629–630

Head Matter:
Jeremiah F. MCMILLON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 103258
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Filed: June 21, 2016
Maleaner R. Harvey, Public Defender’s Office, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101, for Appellant.
Mary H. ’Moore, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102, for Respondent.
Before Philip M. Hess, P. J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J. and Angela T. Quigless, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Jeremiah McMillon (Movant) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, Movant argues that the motion court erred when it found that: (1) pretrial counsel was not ineffective for failing to challenge a lineup in which a victim identified Movant without Movant's counsel present; and (2) appellate counsel was not ineffective for failing to assert on appeal that multiple victim identifications should have been suppressed because they were the result of suggestive police procedures. Finding no error, we affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and have determined' that an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.