Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Princel WILLIAMS, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2013-02-26
Citations: 392 S.W.3d 528
Docket Number: No. ED 97997
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Princel WILLIAMS, Appellant.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR. P.J. and ROY L. RICHTER and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 392
Pages: 528–529

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Princel WILLIAMS, Appellant.
No. ED 97997.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Feb. 26, 2013.
Margaret M. Johnston, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.
Chris A. Koster, Attorney General, Andrew C. Hooper, Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR. P.J. and ROY L. RICHTER and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Princel A. Williams ("Defendant") appeals from the judgment following her conviction of one count of possession of a controlled substance, Section 195.202 RSMo 2000. Defendant argues the trial court erred in overruling her motion for a judgment of acquittal at the close of evidence because the State failed to present sufficient evidence that Defendant knowingly possessed cocaine.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).