Case Name: Roscoe ARTIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Earl H. STRICKLAND; North Carolina State Bar, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-01-22
Citations: 709 F. App'x 204
Docket Number: No. 17-7144
Parties: Roscoe ARTIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Earl H. STRICKLAND; North Carolina State Bar, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 709
Pages: 204–204

Head Matter:
Roscoe ARTIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Earl H. STRICKLAND; North Carolina State Bar, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 17-7144
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: January 18, 2018
Decided: January 22, 2018
Roscoe Artis, Appellant Pro Se.
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Roscoe Artis appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Artis v. Strickland, No. 5:17-ct-03065-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 11, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED