Case Name: Richard James PHILLIPS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1967-02-08
Citations: 194 So. 2d 916
Docket Number: No. 7372
Parties: Richard James PHILLIPS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ALLEN, C. J., and SHANNON and LILES, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 194
Pages: 916–917

Head Matter:
Richard James PHILLIPS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 7372.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.
Feb. 8, 1967.
Robert E. Jagger, Public Defender, Carle-ton, L. Weidemeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellant.
Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Robert R. Crittenden, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed under the authority of Thomas v. State, Fla.App.1964, 163 So.2d 328; Linton v. Cox, 358 F.2d 859 (10th Cir. 1966); and Hamrick v. Boles, 231 F.Supp. 507 (N.D.W.Va.1964). Cf. Mason v. United States, 303 F.2d 775 (9th Cir. 1962).
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
ALLEN, C. J., and SHANNON and LILES, JJ., concur.