Case Name: Franklin POLITE, Appellant, v. Robert HEDSTROM and Trudi Hedstrom, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1981-01-20
Citations: 392 So. 2d 608
Docket Number: No. 80-908
Parties: Franklin POLITE, Appellant, v. Robert HEDSTROM and Trudi Hedstrom, Appellees.
Judges: Before HUBBART, C. J., and SCHWARTZ and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 392
Pages: 608–609

Head Matter:
Franklin POLITE, Appellant, v. Robert HEDSTROM and Trudi Hedstrom, Appellees.
No. 80-908.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan. 20, 1981.
Walsh, Theissen & Boyd and Mark R. Boyd, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
Colodny & Fass, North Miami, for appel-lees.
Before HUBBART, C. J., and SCHWARTZ and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellant has failed to establish that the trial court abused its discretion in granting a new trial on the ground that the jury verdict was contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence. Cloud v. Fallis, 110 So.2d 669 (Fla.1959); Rivera v. White, 386 So.2d 1233 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); see, Baptist Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Bell, 384 So.2d 145 (Fla.1980); Castlewood International Corp. v. LaFleur, 322 So.2d 520 (Fla.1975). The order under review is therefore
Affirmed.