Case Name: Harold Dean ROBERTS, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Stephen M. DEWALT, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-04-02
Citations: 91 F. App'x 302
Docket Number: No. 03-7007
Parties: Harold Dean ROBERTS, Jr., Petitioner—Appellant, v. Stephen M. DEWALT, Respondent—Appellee.
Judges: Before LUTTIG and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 91
Pages: 302–303

Head Matter:
Harold Dean ROBERTS, Jr., Petitioner—Appellant, v. Stephen M. DEWALT, Respondent—Appellee.
No. 03-7007.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 30, 2003.
Decided: April 2, 2004.
Harold Dean Roberts, Jr., Appellant pro se.
Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before LUTTIG and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Harold Dean Roberts, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Roberts v. Dewalt, No. CA-03-9-5-HO (E.D.N.C. June 20, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED