Case Name: PEOPLE OF THE TERRITORY OF GUAM, Plaintiff v. WILLIAM F. SMITH, Defendant
Court: Superior Court of Guam
Jurisdiction: Guam
Decision Date: 1975-06-12
Citations: 1 Guam 282
Docket Number: Criminal No. 255-75
Parties: PEOPLE OF THE TERRITORY OF GUAM, Plaintiff v. WILLIAM F. SMITH, Defendant
Judges: 
Reporter: Guam Reports
Volume: 1
Pages: 282–282

Head Matter:
PEOPLE OF THE TERRITORY OF GUAM, Plaintiff v. WILLIAM F. SMITH, Defendant
Criminal No. 255-75
Superior Court of Guam
June 12, 1975

Opinion:
ABBATE, Judge
DECISION
This Court in the above-entitled matter denied a preliminary hearing at the request of defense counsel. This Court once again, adheres to its original ruling. The defendant has come before the Court to plead on an information (emphasis mine) duly signed by an assistant attorney general. A preliminary examination does not have to be held if an information is filed. Rule 5(c) is only applicable where a person is arrested under a warrant, or without a warrant, and a complaint is issued in compliance with Rule 4(a). The purpose of a preliminary examination has no other purpose than to afford a person an opportunity to challenge the existence of probable cause. It serves no useful purpose to have a preliminary examination after an information has been filed by the Office of the Attorney General. See Roddy v. United States, 296 F.2d 9.