Case Name: Morris SPEIGHT-BEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles WILLIAMS, Warden, Alien Property Custodian, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-05-23
Citations: 639 F. App'x 969
Docket Number: No. 16-6324
Parties: Morris SPEIGHT-BEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles WILLIAMS, Warden, Alien Property Custodian, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 639
Pages: 969–970

Head Matter:
Morris SPEIGHT-BEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles WILLIAMS, Warden, Alien Property Custodian, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 16-6324.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 18, 2016.
Decided: May 23, 2016.
Morris Speight-Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Campbell Altmeyer, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia; Erin K. Reisenweber, Assistant United States' Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Morris Speight-Bey seeks to appeal the district court's order directing a response to his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Speight-Bey seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.