Case Name: REITMAN, Respondent, v. NEULANDER, et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1899-10-25
Citations: 60 N.Y.S. 1146
Docket Number: 
Parties: REITMAN, Respondent, v. NEULANDER, et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 60
Pages: 1146–1146

Head Matter:
REITMAN, Respondent, v. NEULANDER, et al., Appellants.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
October 25, 1899.)
Action by Albert Reitman against Morris Neulander and others. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant Neulander appeals.
Reversed.
Henry L. Franklin, for appellant.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The record in this case, as in that of Reitman v. Neulander (decided at this term) ubi supra, shows that the defendant Neulander, who alone appeals, is a resident of the county of Kings. The municipal court, borough of Manhattan, Fourth district, was therefore without jurisdiction of the person of the defendant, and the judgment must consequently be reversed. Tyroler v. Gummersbach, 28 Misc. Rep. 151, 59 N. Y. Supp. 266, 319; Philip Semmer Glass Co. v. Nassau Show-Case Co., 28 Misc. Rep. 577, 59 N. Y. Supp. 530. Judgment reversed, with costs to appellant.