Case Name: Maria Marta LOPEZ, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-08-01
Citations: 286 F. App'x 485
Docket Number: No. 04-75144
Parties: Maria Marta LOPEZ, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 286
Pages: 485–485

Head Matter:
Maria Marta LOPEZ, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 04-75144.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 22, 2008.
Filed Aug. 1, 2008.
Before: B. FLETCHER, THOMAS, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Maria Marta Lopez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order summarily affirming an immigration judge's ("IJ") decision denying her application for cancellation of removal and her request for voluntary departure. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we grant the petition for review.
Lopez contends that the IJ violated due process by denying her a continuance, thereby violating her right to counsel and preventing her from presenting new evidence. Although Lopez raised these issues in her Notice of Appeal to the BIA, the BIA improperly failed to address them. See Montes-Lopez v. Gonzales, 486 F.3d 1163, 1165 (9th Cir.2007) ("[Tjhe BIA errs when it fails on appeal to consider and decide claims that the IJ proceedings suffered from procedural irregularity."). We therefore remand for further proceedings. See id.
In light of our disposition, we need not address Lopez's remaining contentions.
PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.