Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. NANCY CAROLYN SMITH, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1991-01-23
Citations: 105 Or. App. 404
Docket Number: 89C-20328; CA A62044
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. NANCY CAROLYN SMITH, Appellant.
Judges: Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 105
Pages: 404–405

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted December 21, 1990,
conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing January 23, 1991
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. NANCY CAROLYN SMITH, Appellant.
(89C-20328; CA A62044)
803 P2d 784
Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Salem.
Janet A. Klapstein, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.
Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant was convicted of theft in the first degree for receiving stolen property. ORS 164.055. As part of her sentence, restitution was ordered. The restitution included $200 that the state concedes should not have been imposed, because it was for damage to the building from which the stolen goods were taken before defendant became involved. We accept the concession.
We affirm defendant's conviction and remand for resentencing, with instructions to reduce restitution by $200.
Conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing not inconsistent with this opinion.