Case Name: In the Matter of the Claim of Marie Sarmanokian, Appellant. John E. Sweeney, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1995-03-30
Citations: 213 A.D.2d 956
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Claim of Marie Sarmanokian, Appellant. John E. Sweeney, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 213
Pages: 956–956

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Claim of Marie Sarmanokian, Appellant. John E. Sweeney, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
[624 NYS2d 978]

Opinion:
—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 29, 1993, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.
Claimant's case was reopened by the Board upon its own motion for the purpose of determining whether there had been compliance with the procedural safeguards set forth in the consent judgment in Municipal Labor Comm. v Sitkin (1983 WL 44294 [SD NY]). The Board found no substantial procedural violations and, therefore, adhered to its prior decision disqualifying claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits. The procedural errors asserted by claimant are unpersuasive and we conclude that the Board's decision must be upheld.
Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Yesawich Jr., Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.