Case Name: Anthony Pierce GRIGSBY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Hector Daniel LUDI, Medical Doctor, Attending Staff Physician, individual and official capacity; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-10-04
Citations: 698 F. App'x 475
Docket Number: No. 15-56355
Parties: Anthony Pierce GRIGSBY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Hector Daniel LUDI, Medical Doctor, Attending Staff Physician, individual and official capacity; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 698
Pages: 475–475

Head Matter:
Anthony Pierce GRIGSBY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Hector Daniel LUDI, Medical Doctor, Attending Staff Physician, individual and official capacity; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15-56355
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted September 26, 2017
OCTOBER 4, 2017
Anthony Pierce Grigsby Norco, CA, for pro se.
Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
California state prisoner Anthony Pierce Grigsby appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing for failure to prosecute his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to a serious medical need. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. Omstead v. Dell, Inc., 594 F.3d 1081, 1084 (9th Cir, 2010). We vacate and remand.
Although the district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Grigsby's action for failure to prosecute, see id., Grigs-by attached to his notice of appeal prison mail logs and a declaration indicating that Grigsby never received the district court's February 19, 2015 or March 20, 2015 orders. Because the district court did not have the benefit of these documents, we vacate the judgment of dismissal and remand so the district court can permit Grigsby to file a response to the order to show cause.
VACATED and REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.