Case Name: In the Matter of the Petition of New York Water Service Corporation, Petitioner, for an Order of Certiorari Directed to Water Power and Control Commission of the Department of Conservation of the State of New York, Respondent. The City of New York, Objector, Respondent, and The County of Nassau and The County of Suffolk, Intervenors, Respondents. (Water Supply Application No. 750.)
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1939-01-11
Citations: 256 A.D. 858
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Petition of New York Water Service Corporation, Petitioner, for an Order of Certiorari Directed to Water Power and Control Commission of the Department of Conservation of the State of New York, Respondent. The City of New York, Objector, Respondent, and The County of Nassau and The County of Suffolk, Intervenors, Respondents. (Water Supply Application No. 750.)
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 256
Pages: 858–858

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Petition of New York Water Service Corporation, Petitioner, for an Order of Certiorari Directed to Water Power and Control Commission of the Department of Conservation of the State of New York, Respondent. The City of New York, Objector, Respondent, and The County of Nassau and The County of Suffolk, Intervenors, Respondents. (Water Supply Application No. 750.)

Opinion:
— Review by certiorari of a determination of the Water Power and Control Commission, Application No. 750, dated January 3, 1935. The petitioner, a public water company, applied to the Commission for the sinking of additional wells to enable it to supply water to its customers. Objections were filed by the city of New York and other applicants. The record indicates efforts generally by water companies on Long Island to secure new sources of supply. The Commission held that the plans proposed were not justified by public necessity, and were neither just nor equitable to other civil divisions, when consideration was given to the future necessities for sources of water in New York city and on Long Island. The petitioner urges that the determination of the Commission was capricious and arbitrary. The evidence justified the determination. Determination unanimously confirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements. Present —• Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.