Case Name: Sharon D. BRINKMEYER, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Donald K. BRINKMEYER, Respondent/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-05-21
Citations: 77 S.W.3d 663
Docket Number: No. ED 79437
Parties: Sharon D. BRINKMEYER, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Donald K. BRINKMEYER, Respondent/Appellant.
Judges: Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 77
Pages: 663–663

Head Matter:
Sharon D. BRINKMEYER, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Donald K. BRINKMEYER, Respondent/Appellant.
No. ED 79437.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
May 21, 2002.
Bruce Hilton, Mark Kiesewetter, Kirk-wood, MO, for appellant.
Simone A. Haberstock, Clayton, MO, for respondent.
Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Husband, Donald K. Brinkmeyer, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dissolving his marriage to wife, Sharon D. Brinkmeyer.
We have reviewed the record on appeal and find that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties, however, have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).