Case Name: Rodney Victor HARRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Scarlet B. RATCLIFF, Clerk at the Circuit Court of Giles County; Sarah Muncie, Deputy Clerk at the Circuit Court of Giles County; Barbara Lucas, Deputy Clerk at the Circuit Court of Giles County, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-03-17
Citations: 89 F. App'x 430
Docket Number: No. 03-2320
Parties: Rodney Victor HARRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Scarlet B. RATCLIFF, Clerk at the Circuit Court of Giles County; Sarah Muncie, Deputy Clerk at the Circuit Court of Giles County; Barbara Lucas, Deputy Clerk at the Circuit Court of Giles County, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 89
Pages: 430–431

Head Matter:
Rodney Victor HARRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Scarlet B. RATCLIFF, Clerk at the Circuit Court of Giles County; Sarah Muncie, Deputy Clerk at the Circuit Court of Giles County; Barbara Lucas, Deputy Clerk at the Circuit Court of Giles County, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 03-2320.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 11, 2004.
Decided March 17, 2004.
Rodney Victor Harris, Appellant pro se.
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Rodney Victor Harris appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny Harris's motion to supplement the record with circuit court transcripts and all motions set forth therein, and we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Harris v. Ratcliff, No. CA-03-623 (W.D.Va. Sept. 23, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED