Case Name: Jose HERRERA, Appellant, v. Celso ROLON, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2012-07-11
Citations: 91 So. 3d 935
Docket Number: No. 3D11-1620
Parties: Jose HERRERA, Appellant, v. Celso ROLON, Appellee.
Judges: Before EMAS and FERNANDEZ, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 91
Pages: 935–936

Head Matter:
Jose HERRERA, Appellant, v. Celso ROLON, Appellee.
No. 3D11-1620.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 11, 2012.
Adams, Adams & Baca and Robert Wade Adams; Shelly Ray Senecal, for appellant.
Suarez & Montero and Andres G. Montero, Miami, for appellee.
Before EMAS and FERNANDEZ, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
EMAS, J.
Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm the trial court's denial of appellant's amended motion to vacate default.
However, we do so without prejudice for the trial court to consider the appellant's pending, but as yet unheard, "Renewed Motion to Vacate Default Based Upon Newly Discovered Evidence," which on its face seeks relief under Rule 1.540(b), Florida Rule of Civil Procedure. We express no comment on the merits of that motion.