Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Samuel Bosworth, Appellant; The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joseph Tartaro, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1952-01-07
Citations: 279 A.D. 793
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Samuel Bosworth, Appellant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joseph Tartaro, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 279
Pages: 793–793

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Samuel Bosworth, Appellant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joseph Tartaro, Appellant.

Opinion:
The prior statements and testimony of the burglars, the production of which was refused at the trial, have been examined. They contain no contradiction of the testimony as to the times and places of the burglaries and the times and places of the transfers of the property to appellant Bosworth in the presence of appellant Tartaro. Neither is there contradiction of the testimony that the burglars informed the appellants that the property was stolen. In the light of all the evidence as to the actual possession by appellant Bosworth of the property embraced by the first and second counts of the indictment, the claimed error in the charge with regard to the testimony of an alibi affected no substantial right of the appellants and is disregarded. (Code Crim. Pro., § 542.) Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ.