Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Larry Lee HAYNES, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-08-05
Citations: 339 F. App'x 353
Docket Number: No. 09-6395
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Larry Lee HAYNES, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 339
Pages: 353–354

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Larry Lee HAYNES, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-6395.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 30, 2009.
Decided: Aug. 5, 2009.
Larry Lee Haynes, Appellant Pro Se. Sean Kittrell, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Larry Lee Haynes appeals the district court's order granting his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). Haynes relies on Amendment 706 to the Sentencing Guidelines as the basis for his motion. See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual, App. C. Amend. 706. The district court lowered Haynes' sentence from 360 months to 292 months of imprisonment, the bottom of his recalculated sentencing range under the Amendment. Nonetheless, Haynes ap peals. To the extent Haynes seeks a sentence below his amended Guidelines range, we deny relief based on our recent decision in United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247, 257 (4th Cir.2009). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.