Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Alfred HANSSON, Jr., Appellant; Alfred HANSSON, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1993-11-09
Citations: 866 S.W.2d 145
Docket Number: Nos. 61535, 63172
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Alfred HANSSON, Jr., Appellant. Alfred HANSSON, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 866
Pages: 145–146

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Alfred HANSSON, Jr., Appellant. Alfred HANSSON, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 61535, 63172.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Nov. 9, 1993.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Dec. 16, 1993.
Michael J. Mettes, Clayton, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Stacy L. Anderson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals his convictions for kidnapping and armed criminal action and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm pursuant to Rule 30.25(b) and Rule 84.16(b).
We further find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion in Defendant's direct appeal. Rule 30.25(b). Nor would an opinion in Defendant's appeal of his rule 29.15 motion have precedential value. Rule 84.16(b). Therefore, we affirm by order. We have provided the parties with a memorandum for their use only.