Case Name: Cesar BALBIN, Appellant, v. Robert WAYNE, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1999-04-21
Citations: 730 So. 2d 845
Docket Number: No. 98-387
Parties: Cesar BALBIN, Appellant, v. Robert WAYNE, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and JORGENSON and GREEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 730
Pages: 845–846

Head Matter:
Cesar BALBIN, Appellant, v. Robert WAYNE, Appellee.
No. 98-387.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 21, 1999.
Kohlman & Mack, P.A. and Robert F. Kohlman, Miami, for appellant.
Robert Wayne and Margaret Hesford, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and JORGENSON and GREEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the order dismissing the appellant's complaint for lack of prosecution pursuant to Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 1.420, where the record reflects that within the one year period preceding the motion, the appellant filed his responses to request for production and interrogatories propounded by the appellee. We conclude that this record activity was sufficient to withstand dismissal of this cause pursuant to rule 1.420. See generally Titusville Assocs. v. Epoch Management, Inc., 702 So.2d 1309, 1310 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); Cravens v. Kulubis, 694 So.2d 780, 781 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997); American Cas. Co. of Reading, Pa. v. Hess, 654 So.2d 1011, 1014 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Bush v. Univest Real Estate Corp., 636 So.2d 565, 566 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Liuzzo v. Crapo, 504 So.2d 480, 481 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).
Reversed.