Case Name: LOUIS A. SKIPITAREY et al., Appellants, v. BUFF FITTS et al., Respondents
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1932-12-14
Citations: 128 Cal. App. 191
Docket Number: Civ. No. 7222
Parties: LOUIS A. SKIPITAREY et al., Appellants, v. BUFF FITTS et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports
Volume: 128
Pages: 191–192

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 7222.
Second Appellate District, Division Two.
December 14, 1932.]
LOUIS A. SKIPITAREY et al., Appellants, v. BUFF FITTS et al., Respondents.
Louis F. D'Elia, Jr., and U. W. Breeden for Appellants.
Brockman, Vinetz & Gitelson for Respondent Fitts.

Opinion:
THOMPSON (IRA F.), J.
The respondents have made a motion to dismiss the appeal herein on the ground that appellants' opening brief violates that portion of Rule VIII of the Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal requiring each point to be presented separately 11 under an appropriate heading, showing the nature of the question to be presented or the point to be made". There are but two headings or titles in the brief, the one "Statement of the Case" and the other "Argument". It is manifest that respondents' motion is well founded. (See Barnes v. Cocke, 99 Cal. App. 700 [279 Pac. 190], Hawkins v. Doolittle, 113 Cal. App. 619 [298 Pac. 862], Withers v. Southern Pac. Co., 101 Cal. App. 373 [281 Pac. 518], and People v. Yaroslawsky, 110 Cal. App. 175 [293 Pac. 815].)
The appeal is dismissed.
Works, P. J., and Craig, J., concurred.