Case Name: Nellie T. Kelleher, complainant-appellant, v. George H. Bragg, defendant-respondent
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1925-03-16
Citations: 97 N.J. Eq. 547
Docket Number: 
Parties: Nellie T. Kelleher, complainant-appellant, v. George H. Bragg, defendant-respondent.
Judges: For affirmance—The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 13.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 97
Pages: 547–547

Head Matter:
Nellie T. Kelleher, complainant-appellant, v. George H. Bragg, defendant-respondent.
[Argued January 23d, 1925.
Decided March 16th, 1925.]
Messrs. Collins & Gorlin, Mr. Edward. A. Marlcley and Mr. David. A. Newton, for the appellant.
Mr. Charles M. Mason, for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Coriam.
The bill of complaint was filed in this case to compel the specific performance of a contract to sell real estate. The property is known as Nos. 2709, 2711, 2718 and 2718A Boulevard, Jersey City. Vice-Chancellor Lewis, before whom the case was heard, refused to advise a decree for specific performance, but did advise a decree dismissing the bill of complaint.
Our consideration of the case leads us to the same conclusion as that advised by the learned vice-chancellor.
The decree of the court of chancery is therefore affirmed.
For affirmance—The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 13.
For reversal—None.