Case Name: Ancel PRATT, Jr., Appellant, v. Michael C. WEISS, D.O., Michael C. Weiss, D.O., P.A., Louis H. Isaacson, D.O., Louis H. Isaacson, D.O., P.A., Sterling Healthcare Group, Inc., Sterling Miami, Inc., Lauderdale Orthopaedic Surgeons, Michael C. Weiss, D.O., P.A., and FMC Hospital Ltd., a Florida Limited Partnership d/b/a Florida Medical Center, FMC Medical, Inc., f/k/a FMC Center Inc., d/b/a Florida Medical Center, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2015-11-12
Citations: 178 So. 3d 946
Docket Number: No. 4D10-4398
Parties: Ancel PRATT, Jr., Appellant, v. Michael C. WEISS, D.O., Michael C. Weiss, D.O., P.A., Louis H. Isaacson, D.O., Louis H. Isaacson, D.O., P.A., Sterling Healthcare Group, Inc., Sterling Miami, Inc., Lauderdale Orthopaedic Surgeons, Michael C. Weiss, D.O., P.A., and FMC Hospital Ltd., a Florida Limited Partnership d/b/a Florida Medical Center, FMC Medical, Inc., f/k/a FMC Center Inc., d/b/a Florida Medical Center, Appellees.
Judges: GROSS and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 178
Pages: 946–947

Head Matter:
Ancel PRATT, Jr., Appellant, v. Michael C. WEISS, D.O., Michael C. Weiss, D.O., P.A., Louis H. Isaacson, D.O., Louis H. Isaacson, D.O., P.A., Sterling Healthcare Group, Inc., Sterling Miami, Inc., Lauderdale Orthopaedic Surgeons, Michael C. Weiss, D.O., P.A., and FMC Hospital Ltd., a Florida Limited Partnership d/b/a Florida Medical Center, FMC Medical, Inc., f/k/a FMC Center Inc., d/b/a Florida Medical Center, Appellees.
No. 4D10-4398.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Nov. 12, 2015.
Linda A. Alley of Sheldon J. Schlesinger, P.A., Fort Lauderdale and Philip M. Burlington and Andrew A. Harris of Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.
A. Candace Marcus and James C. Saw-ran of McIntosh, Sawran & Cartaya, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.

Opinion:
MAY, J.
This case comes to us upon remand from the Supreme Court of Florida. Pratt v. Weiss, 161 So.3d 1268 (Fla.2015). We, previously affirmed, a trial court order, in which the trial court found an offer of judgment complied with the requirements of section 768.79, Florida Statutes (2004). The supreme court has now quashed our decision and held that the offer failed to comply with section 768.79 and rule 1.442 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons expressed in the supreme court's decision, we now reverse the trial court order and remand the ease for further proceedings.
Reversed and Remanded,
GROSS and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.