Case Name: Gilbert L. SPURLOCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carol A. CASTO; United States Department of Justice, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-01-21
Citations: 308 F. App'x 667
Docket Number: No. 08-2193
Parties: Gilbert L. SPURLOCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carol A. CASTO; United States Department of Justice, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 308
Pages: 667–668

Head Matter:
Gilbert L. SPURLOCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carol A. CASTO; United States Department of Justice, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 08-2193.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 5, 2009.
Decided: Jan. 21, 2009.
Gilbert L. Spurlock, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Michael Horn, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Gilbert L. Spurlock appeals the district court's order accepting in part the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil complaint for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Spurlock v. Casto, No. 3:07-cv-00750, 2008 WL 4282800 (S.D.W.Va. Sept. 16, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.