Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Phillip Karl PRESCOTT, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-10-27
Citations: 401 F. App'x 460
Docket Number: No. 10-11093
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Phillip Karl PRESCOTT, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before BLACK, MARTIN and FAY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 401
Pages: 460–461

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Phillip Karl PRESCOTT, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-11093
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Oct. 27, 2010.
Judy K. Hunt, A. Brian Albritton, Colleen D. Murphy-Davis, David Paul
Rhodes, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Donna Lee Elm, A. Fitzgerald Hall, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Phillip Karl Prescott, Perry, FL, pro se.
Before BLACK, MARTIN and FAY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
A. Fitzgerald Hall, appointed counsel for Phillip Karl Prescott, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguably meritorious issues, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Prescott's convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.