Case Name: Leo M. MULLEN, Appellant, v. STATE BOARD OF REGISTRATION FOR THE HEALING ARTS, David Brydon, Frank Clark, C.C. Reynolds, and Robert Northcutt, Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1996-04-09
Citations: 919 S.W.2d 296
Docket Number: No. WD 51186
Parties: Leo M. MULLEN, Appellant, v. STATE BOARD OF REGISTRATION FOR THE HEALING ARTS, David Brydon, Frank Clark, C.C. Reynolds, and Robert Northcutt, Respondents.
Judges: Before SPINDEN, P.J., and BERREY and LAURA DENVIR STITH, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 919
Pages: 296–296

Head Matter:
Leo M. MULLEN, Appellant, v. STATE BOARD OF REGISTRATION FOR THE HEALING ARTS, David Brydon, Frank Clark, C.C. Reynolds, and Robert Northcutt, Respondents.
No. WD 51186.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
April 9, 1996.
Peter J. Koppe, Kansas City, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Amy Randles, Asst. Atty Gen., Jefferson City, for respondents.
Before SPINDEN, P.J., and BERREY and LAURA DENVIR STITH, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Leo Mullen appeals the circuit court's dismissal of his case for failure to prosecute. He contends that the circuit court erred in dismissing his petition because justice prefers a trial of the matter on the merits rather than dismissal. We affirm. Discerning no jurisprudential value in publishing an opinion, we issue this summary order. Rule 84.16(b). We have issued a memorandum to the parties explaining our ruling.