Case Name: SPENCER, INC., Appellant, v. Sarah Kendrick KENNINGTON, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1964-10-12
Citations: 337 F.2d 289
Docket Number: No. 21297
Parties: SPENCER, INC., Appellant, v. Sarah Kendrick KENNINGTON, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 337
Pages: 289–289

Head Matter:
SPENCER, INC., Appellant, v. Sarah Kendrick KENNINGTON, Appellee.
No. 21297.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
Oct. 12, 1964.
H. P. Burt, Albany, Ga., Burt & Burt, Albany, Ga., for appellant.
Marcus B. Calhoun, Thomasville, Ga., Forester & Calhoun, Thomasville, Ga., for appellee.
Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, BELL, Circuit Judge, and WHITEHURST, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. It was not error for the trial court to overrule the motion for summary judgment. The issue whether appellant's employee was an agent of appellant acting within the scope of her employment at the time of the collision is a fact question which has been resolved by the jury upon a proper submission of the applicable law to it.
The judgment is affirmed.