Case Name: Jack Sherrill BENTLEY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, etc., et al., Respondents
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-11-01
Citations: 770 So. 2d 261
Docket Number: No. 4D00-631
Parties: Jack Sherrill BENTLEY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, etc., et al., Respondents.
Judges: STEVENSON, TAYLOR and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 770
Pages: 261–261

Head Matter:
Jack Sherrill BENTLEY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, etc., et al., Respondents.
No. 4D00-631.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Nov. 1, 2000.
Jack Sherrill Bentley, Belle Glade, pro se.
Wendy Benner-Leon, Assistant General Counsel, Tallahassee, for Respondent-DOC.
For majority opinion of the court, see 769 So.2d 430.

Opinion:
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
PER CURIAM.
We deny petitioner's motion for rehearing in which he argues, incorrectly, that the circuit court ordered all three of his minimum mandatory sentences to run concurrently. The order required that only his minimum mandatory sentences for his convictions of armed robbery and possession of a firearm in the commission of a felony (case number CR84-2680) run concurrently because they arose out of the same criminal episode. On the other hand, his conviction for armed robbery in case number CR84-2682 arose from an entirely separate criminal episode. Thus, there was no error in ordering that the minimum mandatory sentence imposed in case number CR84-2682 run consecutive to the minimum mandatory sentences in the other case. The record shows that the Department of Corrections structured his sentences accordingly.
DENIED.
STEVENSON, TAYLOR and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.