Case Name: Daniel T. MORRIS v. Roger E. STUEBEN, M.D., et al.
Court: Louisiana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 2001-01-26
Citations: 781 So. 2d 1220
Docket Number: No. 2001-CC-0137
Parties: Daniel T. MORRIS v. Roger E. STUEBEN, M.D., et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 781
Pages: 1220–1221

Head Matter:
Daniel T. MORRIS v. Roger E. STUEBEN, M.D., et al.
No. 2001-CC-0137.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Jan. 26, 2001.
Opinion Denying Reconsideration March 16, 2001.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The application for reconsideration is denied. Relator's original writ application in this court was filed on January 16, 2001, sixty-nine days after the court of appeal denied his writ application on November 8, 2000 and well outside of the thirty day period mandated by Supreme Court Rule X, § 5. Although relator's application in this court was filed within thirty days from the court of appeal's denial of rehearing, Supreme Court Rule X, § 5(a) extends the thirty day period for taking writs to this court only "in those instances where a rehearing is allowed" in the court of appeal. Uniform Court of Appeal Rules 4-9 and 2-18.7 do not provide for a rehearing from a denial of an application for supervisory writs. Accordingly, the delay for taking writs to this court ran from the court of appeal's original writ denial, not its denial of rehearing.