Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ANDREW FREDERIC PULCIPHER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2009-05-27
Citations: 228 Or. App. 738
Docket Number: C020754CR, C020987CR, C013620CR; A118944, A120457, A120070
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ANDREW FREDERIC PULCIPHER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Brewer, Chief Judge, and Haselton, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 228
Pages: 738–739

Head Matter:
On appellant’s petition for reconsideration filed April 15,
reconsideration allowed; former opinion (227 Or App 9, 204 P3d 852) modified and adhered to as modified May 27, 2009
STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ANDREW FREDERIC PULCIPHER, Defendant-Appellant.
Washington County Circuit Court
C020754CR, C020987CR, C013620CR;
A118944 (Control), A120457, A120070
209 P3d 380
Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, and Rebecca Duncan, Assistant Chief Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, for petition.
Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Brewer, Chief Judge, and Haselton, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant petitions for reconsideration of our opinion in State v. Pulcipher, 227 Or App 9, 204 P3d 852 (2009), on the basis that we erred in describing his sentence on Count 9 of the indictment as a "consecutive 12-month departure sentence." Id. at 11. In reviewing the record, we agree with defendant. The sentence imposed on Count 9 of the indictment was a consecutive 12-month sentence, not a "consecutive departure sentence." Our erroneous description of defendant's sentence on Count 9 had no effect on our analysis in the remainder of the opinion. Accordingly, we adhere to our opinion as modified to correct the description of defendant's sentence on Count 9.
Reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified and adhered to as modified.