Case Name: STATE v. JOSEPH WALDKIRSCH
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1926-02-09
Citations: 117 Or. 218
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE v. JOSEPH WALDKIRSCH.
Judges: Burnett, Rand and Coshow, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 117
Pages: 218–219

Head Matter:
Argued February 2,
affirmed February 9, 1926.
STATE v. JOSEPH WALDKIRSCH.
(243 Pac. 89.)
Por appellant there was a orief over the names of Mr. H. F. Mclnturff and Mr. Paul G. Bormitser, with an oral argument by Mr. Mclnturff
Por respondent there was a brief over tbe names of Mr. Stanley Myers, District Attorney, and Mr. Ciar ence Beckman, Deputy District Attorney, with an oral argument by Mr. Beckman.

Opinion:
McBRXDE, C. J.
This is a companion case to the case of State of Oregon v. Freauff, and it is agreed that it shall take the same course and abide the event of the decision of the ease of State of Oregon v. Freauff, ante, p. 214 (243 Pac. 87). It is therefore directed that the order of the Circuit Court in this case shall be affirmed. Affirmed.
Burnett, Rand and Coshow, JJ., concur.