Case Name: Francis W. Ruzicka et al., Copartners Doing Business as Ruzicka's, Appellants, v. Edward Rager, Respondent; Edward Rager, Respondent, v. Francis W. Ruzicka et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants. (Consolidated Appeals.)
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1952-05-20
Citations: 279 A.D. 1061
Docket Number: 
Parties: Francis W. Ruzicka et al., Copartners Doing Business as Ruzicka’s, Appellants, v. Edward Rager, Respondent. Edward Rager, Respondent, v. Francis W. Ruzicka et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants. (Consolidated Appeals.)
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 279
Pages: 1061–1061

Head Matter:
Francis W. Ruzicka et al., Copartners Doing Business as Ruzicka’s, Appellants, v. Edward Rager, Respondent. Edward Rager, Respondent, v. Francis W. Ruzicka et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants. (Consolidated Appeals.)

Opinion:
The fourth defense and second counterclaim is available only against plaintiff partnership. The fifth defense and third counterclaim is not one which may properly be interposed in the action. (See memorandum opinion in Ruzicka v. Rager, ante, p. 1061, decided herewith.) Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See post, p. 1069.]