Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alfred Dockery MCLAUGHLIN, IV, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-05-19
Citations: 97 F. App'x 769
Docket Number: No. 03-50329
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alfred Dockery MCLAUGHLIN, IV, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 97
Pages: 769–770

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alfred Dockery MCLAUGHLIN, IV, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 03-50329.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 10, 2004.
Decided May 19, 2004.
Ronald L. Cheng, Esq., Matthew Umhofer, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Elizabeth A. Newman, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Alfred Dockery McLaughlin, IV, appeals his 30-month sentence following his guilty plea conviction for attempted unarmed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a).
McLaughlin contends that the district court erred by denying his requested downward departure for reduced mental capacity under U.S.S.G. § 5K2.13. We lack jurisdiction to review the district court's discretionary denial of a request for departure, and we dismiss. See United States v. Smith, 330 F.3d 1209, 1212 (9th Cir.2003).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.