Case Name: Andrea C. WEATHERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL; Herbert B. Peterson, in his individual and official capacity; Jonathan Kotch, in his individual and official capacity; Barbara K. Rimer, in her individual and official capacity; Edward M. Foster, in his individual and official capacity; Sandra L. Martin, in her individual and official capacity, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-07-22
Citations: 578 F. App'x 300
Docket Number: No. 14-1044
Parties: Andrea C. WEATHERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL; Herbert B. Peterson, in his individual and official capacity; Jonathan Kotch, in his individual and official capacity; Barbara K. Rimer, in her individual and official capacity; Edward M. Foster, in his individual and official capacity; Sandra L. Martin, in her individual and official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 578
Pages: 300–300

Head Matter:
Andrea C. WEATHERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL; Herbert B. Peterson, in his individual and official capacity; Jonathan Kotch, in his individual and official capacity; Barbara K. Rimer, in her individual and official capacity; Edward M. Foster, in his individual and official capacity; Sandra L. Martin, in her individual and official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 14-1044.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 30, 2014.
Decided: July 22, 2014.
Andrea C. Weathers, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Thomas Tulchin, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Andrea C. Weathers appeals the district court's order granting Defendants' motion to dismiss her action for relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(d)(1), (3). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Weathers v. Univ. of N.C., No. 1:12-cv-01059-TDS-JEP, 2013 WL 5462300 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 30, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.