Case Name: Dave SCHNEIDER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gordon R. ENGLAND, Secretary of the Navy, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-06-25
Citations: 40 F. App'x 575
Docket Number: No. 01-55941; D.C. No. CV-96-06665-MRP
Parties: Dave SCHNEIDER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gordon R. ENGLAND, Secretary of the Navy, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 40
Pages: 575–576

Head Matter:
Dave SCHNEIDER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gordon R. ENGLAND, Secretary of the Navy, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 01-55941.
D.C. No. CV-96-06665-MRP.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 7, 2002.
Decided June 25, 2002.
Before FERNANDEZ, WARDLAW, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Gordon R. England is substituted for John H. Dalton, Secretary of the Navy, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
David Schneider brought this mixed claim action against the Secretary of the Navy on the bases that he had been discriminated against on account of a disability and that he had been retaliated against for whistleblowing. At an earlier time, the district court granted summary judgment to the Secretary on the discrimination claim. We affirmed. Schneider now appeals the district court's later dismissal of the nondiscrimination (whistleblower) claim. The dismissal was based upon Schneider's failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. We affirm.
There can be no doubt that Schneider failed to present his whistleblower retaliation claim to the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) before he brought his mixed claim action in the district court. Thus, he has not preserved that claim for judicial review. See Sloan v. West, 140 F.3d 1255, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1998); see also Nater V. Riley, 114 F.Supp.2d 17, 24 (D.P.R.2000), aff'd, 2001 WL 828290, 15 Fed.Appx. 11 (1st Cir. July 23, 2001) (unpublished disposition), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 122 S.Ct. 1544, 152 L.Ed.2d 470 (2002). Indeed, when an employee bypasses the MSPB, federal courts cannot possibly apply the proper deferential standard of review to the agency's action on a nondiscrimination claim.
AFFIRMED.
jjjjg diSp0Siti0n is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
. Schneider v. Dalton, No. 98-55281, 1999 WL 1079628, at *1 (9th Cir. Nov. 30, 1999) (unpublished disposition).
. See Washington v. Garrett, 10 F.3d 1421, 1428 (9th Cir. 1993).