Case Name: SAN SEBASTIAN APARTMENTS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Bruce NACHMAN and Gigi S. Nachman, f/k/a Gigi S. Auerbach, his wife, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1967-11-14
Citations: 204 So. 2d 219
Docket Number: No. 67-116
Parties: SAN SEBASTIAN APARTMENTS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Bruce NACHMAN and Gigi S. Nachman, f/k/a Gigi S. Auerbach, his wife, Appellees.
Judges: Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and HENDRY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 204
Pages: 219–219

Head Matter:
SAN SEBASTIAN APARTMENTS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Bruce NACHMAN and Gigi S. Nachman, f/k/a Gigi S. Auerbach, his wife, Appellees.
No. 67-116.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
Nov. 14, 1967.
Rehearing Denied Dec. 12, 1967.
Fink & Syna, Miami, for appellant.
Robert H. Crary, Judith Brechner, Miami Beach, for appellees.
Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and HENDRY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal, by an unsuccessful landlord, from an order of the trial court refusing to remove a tenant in statutory removal proceedings pursuant to Ch. 83, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.
It has been made to appear that the appellees are no longer in possession of the premises involved. Therefore, this appeal is moot [see: Barrs v. Peacock, 65 Fla. 12, 61 So. 118; DuBose v. Meister, 92 Fla. 995, 110 So. 546; Dehoff v. Imeson, 153 Fla. 553, 15 So.2d 258; Gill v. City of North Miami Beach, Fla.App. 1963, 156 So.2d 182; 2 Fla.Jur., Appeals, § 291] and same is hereby dismissed.
It is so ordered.