Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Demetrius Obrien CAMPBELL, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-10-03
Citations: 479 F. App'x 533
Docket Number: No. 12-6990
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Demetrius Obrien CAMPBELL, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 479
Pages: 533–534

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Demetrius Obrien CAMPBELL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-6990.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 18, 2012.
Decided: Oct. 3, 2012.
Demetrius Obrien Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Andrew Bassford, Assistant United States Attorney, Kartic Pad-manabhan, Office of the United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Demetrius Obrien Campbell seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.
We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Campbell has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certifícate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.