Case Name: Rogelio RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1994-12-14
Citations: 645 So. 2d 1124
Docket Number: No. 93-2728
Parties: Rogelio RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and BASKIN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 645
Pages: 1124–1125

Head Matter:
Rogelio RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 93-2728.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 14, 1994.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Howard K. Blumberg, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Fleur J. Lobree, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and BASKIN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Rogelio Rodriguez appeals an order summarily denying a Rule 3.850 motion and an order revoking probation. We reverse the order summarily denying Rodriguez post-conviction relief and remand for further proceedings. Rodriguez contends that he was not aware of the maximum penalty upon entry of his plea. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c)(1). The trial court concluded that Rodriguez "knew he was looking at substantial prison time upon a violation, a sentence in excess of twenty-seven years State Prison." The record fails to refute Rodriguez' claim. On remand, the trial court must conduct an eviden-tiary hearing. Griffin v. State, 644 So.2d 351 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). We affirm the order revoking probation as modified. We strike the portion of the order finding that Rodriguez failed to submit timely for a drug test.