Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sharon Jane BOYETT, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-01-31
Citations: 215 F. App'x 354
Docket Number: No. 05-40799
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sharon Jane BOYETT, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before DAVTS, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 215
Pages: 354–354

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sharon Jane BOYETT, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-40799
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Jan. 31, 2007.
Michelle S. Englade, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Texas, Beaumont, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Bernard John Shealy, Amy R. Blalock, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Eastern District of Texas, Tyler, TX, for Defendants Appellant.
Before DAVTS, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Sharon Jane Boyett has moved for leave to withdraw from representation and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Boyett has filed several responses. Our independent review of the record, counsel's brief, and Boyett's responses shows that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Although Boyett argues in one of her responses that her counsel was ineffective for various reasons, the record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration of these claims on direct appeal. See United States v. Higdon, 832 F.2d 312, 313-14 (5th Cir.1987).
Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and this appeal is DISMISSED. All other outstanding motions are DENIED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under file limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.