Case Name: Betty T. RANDAL, Appellant, v. Thomas J. BAKER, M.D., et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1973-02-21
Citations: 274 So. 2d 564
Docket Number: No. 72-665
Parties: Betty T. RANDAL, Appellant, v. Thomas J. BAKER, M.D., et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ., and LESTER, M. IGNATIUS, Associate Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 274
Pages: 564–564

Head Matter:
Betty T. RANDAL, Appellant, v. Thomas J. BAKER, M.D., et al., Appellees.
No. 72-665.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 21, 1973.
Rehearing Denied April 4, 1973.
Betty T. Randal, in pro. per.
Blackwell, Walker & Gray, Miami, and Jonathon P. Lynn, Quinton, Leib & Aurell and Paul C. Huck, Miami, for appellees.
Before PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ., and LESTER, M. IGNATIUS, Associate Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellant, Betty T. Randal, appeals a summary final judgment entered for the appellees who are medical doctors. Appellant's complaint charged medical malpractice in the performance of cosmetic surgery. The trial judge entered a summary judgment for the appellees upon the basis of the pleadings, affidavits and discovery in the file. We have thoroughly examined the record in the light of appellant's brief and we find that this case is governed by the principles set forth in Rosen v. Parkway General Hospital, Inc., Fla.App. 1972, 265 So.2d 93. See also Martin v. Parks, Fla.App. 1964, 165 So.2d 220; Crovella v. Cochrane, Fla.App.1958, 102 So. 2d 307.
Affirmed.