Case Name: DADE NEON SIGN & SERVICE and Highway Insurance Company, Petitioners, v. Roberto VIDAL and Consolidated Mutual Insurance Company, Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1965-03-03
Citations: 172 So. 2d 450
Docket Number: No. 33831
Parties: DADE NEON SIGN & SERVICE and Highway Insurance Company, Petitioners, v. Roberto VIDAL and Consolidated Mutual Insurance Company, Respondents.
Judges: DREW, C. J., and ROBERTS, THOR-NAL, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 172
Pages: 450–450

Head Matter:
DADE NEON SIGN & SERVICE and Highway Insurance Company, Petitioners, v. Roberto VIDAL and Consolidated Mutual Insurance Company, Respondents.
No. 33831.
Supreme Court of Florida.
March 3, 1965.
McDonald & McDonald, Miami, for petitioners and cross-respondent.
Gerald Shapiro, Miami, for respondent and cross-petitioner.
Howard N. Pelzner, Miami, for Consolidated Mut. Ins. Co., respondent.
Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for Florida Industrial Commission.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition and cross-petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission hearing date September 8, 1964.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petitions, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition and cross-petition are therefore denied.
DREW, C. J., and ROBERTS, THOR-NAL, O'CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.