Case Name: Malik BEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SHAPIRO BROWN & ALT, LLP, Substitute Trustees; New York Community Bank, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-10-06
Citations: 584 F. App'x 135
Docket Number: No. 14-1378
Parties: Malik BEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SHAPIRO BROWN & ALT, LLP, Substitute Trustees; New York Community Bank, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 584
Pages: 135–135

Head Matter:
Malik BEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SHAPIRO BROWN & ALT, LLP, Substitute Trustees; New York Community Bank, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 14-1378.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 16, 2014.
Decided: Oct. 6, 2014.
Malik Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Bizhan Beiramee, Alexander Richard Green, McGinnis Wutscher Beiramee, LLP, Bethesda, Maryland; Craig James Franco, Odin, Feldman & Pittleman, PC, Reston, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Malik Bey appeals the district court's orders dismissing his complaint alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692-1692y (2012), the Maryland Consumer Debt Collections Act, Md.Code Ann., Com. Law, § 14-201 to -204, and the Maryland Consumer Protection Act, Md.Code Ann., Com. Law, § 13-101 to -501, and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bey v. Shapiro Brown & Alt, LLP, No. 8:13-cv-01562-PWG (D. Md. Feb. 20 & Mar. 21, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.