Case Name: Barry CARTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer S. KHAN, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-07-27
Citations: 693 F. App'x 268
Docket Number: No. 15-2516
Parties: Barry CARTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer S. KHAN, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before MOTZ, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 693
Pages: 268–268

Head Matter:
Barry CARTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer S. KHAN, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 15-2516
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 30, 2017
Decided: July 27, 2017
Donald F. Rosendorf, LAW OFFICE OF DONALD F. ROSENDORF, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Julia B. Judkins, BANCROFT, MCGAVIN, HOR-VATH & JUDKINS, P.C., Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Barry Carter appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We affirm the decision of the district court for the reasons stated with respect to the existence of probable cause to arrest Carter for the equipment violation and with respect to its holding that the defendant was entitled to qualified immunity on Carter's use of force claim due to the absence of clearly established law. Carter v. Kahn, No. 1:15-cv-00572-JCC-JFA (E.D. Va. Nov. 4, 2015). We express no opinion on the district court's finding with respect to the existence of probable cause to arrest Carter for obstruction of justice or with respect to the conclusion that the use of force was objectively reasonable. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED