Case Name: Stafford DILWORTH, Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-01-16
Citations: 36 S.W.3d 407
Docket Number: No. ED 78136
Parties: Stafford DILWORTH, Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Respondent.
Judges: Before AHRENS, P.J., CRANDALL, J., and JAMES R. DOWD, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 36
Pages: 407–407

Head Matter:
Stafford DILWORTH, Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Respondent.
No. ED 78136.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Jan. 16, 2001.
Rick Barry, St. Louis, for appellant.
Thomas J. Ray, City Counselor, Kathleen G. Tanner, Edward J. Hanlon, Asst. City Counselors, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before AHRENS, P.J., CRANDALL, J., and JAMES R. DOWD, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Stafford Dilworth ("employee"), an airport police officer, appeals from the decision of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, upholding the civil service commission's ("commission") decision affirming the dismissal of an employee for failing a random drug test. Employee contends commission erred in affirming the dismissal of employee because the City of St. Louis ("city") failed to follow established testing procedures and because commission considered evidence outside the record.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).