Case Name: Isaac Coltinuk et ux., respondents, v. Lena Hockstein et ux., appellants
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1925-01-19
Citations: 97 N.J. Eq. 371
Docket Number: 
Parties: Isaac Coltinuk et ux., respondents, v. Lena Hockstein et ux., appellants.
Judges: For affirmance—The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Min-turn, Black, Katzenbach, Lloyd, Clark, McGlennon, JJ. 8.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 97
Pages: 371–371

Head Matter:
Isaac Coltinuk et ux., respondents, v. Lena Hockstein et ux., appellants.
[Submitted October term, 1924.
Decided January 19th, 1925.]
Messrs. Dernbe & Dernbe and Mr. Maximilian T. Rosenberg, for the appellants.
Mr. Carl T. Olson and Mr. Merritt Lane, for the respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The bill of complaint in this case was filed to compel specific performance of a contract to convey real estate, located in the city of Bayonne.
Our reading of the record and a consideration of the briefs lead us to the same conclusion as that of the vice-chancellor, viz., a decree for specific performance should be ordered.
The decree of the court of chancery is therefore affirmed.
For affirmance—The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Min-turn, Black, Katzenbach, Lloyd, Clark, McGlennon, JJ. 8.
For reversal—Parker, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Kays, JJ. 6.