Case Name: Salvatore D'Angelis et al., Plaintiffs, v. Leonard Litwin et al., Doing Business as Arwin 74th Street Co., et al., Appellants, and Meyerbank Electric Co., Inc., Respondent; Leonard Litwin et al., Doing Business as Arwin 74th Street Co., et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Acme-Ace Inc. et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents; Salvatore D'Angelis et al., Plaintiffs, v. Eisenberg Sons Carpentry, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent; Meyerbank Electric Co., Inc., Fourth-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Acme-Ace Inc. et al., Fourth-Party Defendants-Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1981-11-24
Citations: 84 A.D.2d 722
Docket Number: 
Parties: Salvatore D’Angelis et al., Plaintiffs, v Leonard Litwin et al., Doing Business as Arwin 74th Street Co., et al., Appellants, and Meyerbank Electric Co., Inc., Respondent. Leonard Litwin et al., Doing Business as Arwin 74th Street Co., et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, v Acme-Ace Inc. et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents. Salvatore D’Angelis et al., Plaintiffs, v Eisenberg Sons Carpentry, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent. Meyerbank Electric Co., Inc., Fourth-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v Acme-Ace Inc. et al., Fourth-Party Defendants-Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 84
Pages: 722–724

Head Matter:
Salvatore D’Angelis et al., Plaintiffs, v Leonard Litwin et al., Doing Business as Arwin 74th Street Co., et al., Appellants, and Meyerbank Electric Co., Inc., Respondent. Leonard Litwin et al., Doing Business as Arwin 74th Street Co., et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, v Acme-Ace Inc. et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents. Salvatore D’Angelis et al., Plaintiffs, v Eisenberg Sons Carpentry, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent. Meyerbank Electric Co., Inc., Fourth-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v Acme-Ace Inc. et al., Fourth-Party Defendants-Respondents.

Opinion:
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Silbowitz, J.), entered on August 7, 1980, affirmed. All respondents filing briefs shall recover of appellants one bill of $75 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Concur — Kupferman, Sandler and Fein, JJ; Murphy, P. J., and Lynch, J., dissent in part in separate memoranda as follows.