Case Name: Mildred Schwartz, Respondent, v. Samuel Frank & Company, Inc., and Samuel Frank, Defendants, and Isadore J. Ginsberg, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1928-12
Citations: 225 A.D. 763
Docket Number: 
Parties: Mildred Schwartz, Respondent, v. Samuel Frank & Company, Inc., and Samuel Frank, Defendants, and Isadore J. Ginsberg, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 225
Pages: 763–764

Head Matter:
Mildred Schwartz, Respondent, v. Samuel Frank & Company, Inc., and Samuel Frank, Defendants, and Isadore J. Ginsberg, Appellant.

Opinion:
Judgment reversed upon the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event. The court is of opinion that the remarks made by the trial justice at folios 117, 118, 125, 126 and 128 — although the last mentioned was corrected by the charge — were unjustified and prejudicial to the appellant. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Seeger and Carswell, JJ., concur.