Case Name: CALIFORNIA MEN'S COLONY, UNIT II MEN'S ADV. COUNCIL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James ROWLAND, Director, James H. Gomez, Sara Bruce, Leslie Bandaccari, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1993-04-14
Citations: 990 F.2d 519
Docket Number: No. 90-55600
Parties: CALIFORNIA MEN’S COLONY, UNIT II MEN’S ADV. COUNCIL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James ROWLAND, Director, James H. Gomez, Sara Bruce, Leslie Bandaccari, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: TANG, REINHARDT, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 990
Pages: 519–519

Head Matter:
CALIFORNIA MEN’S COLONY, UNIT II MEN’S ADV. COUNCIL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James ROWLAND, Director, James H. Gomez, Sara Bruce, Leslie Bandaccari, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 90-55600.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
April 14, 1993.
Before: TANG, REINHARDT, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
Pursuant to the opinion of the United States Supreme Court, the prior judgment of this court is vacated and the case is remanded to the district court, where the motion for leave to file in forma pauperis must be denied. Rowland v. California Men's Colony, — U.S. -, -, 113 S.Ct. 716, 726, 121 L.Ed.2d 656 (1993).