Case Name: Fleet Mortgage Corp., Respondent, v. Theodore Rebich, Jr., Appellant, et al., Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1996-05-20
Citations: 227 A.D.2d 518
Docket Number: 
Parties: Fleet Mortgage Corp., Respondent, v Theodore Rebich, Jr., Appellant, et al., Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 227
Pages: 518–519

Head Matter:
Fleet Mortgage Corp., Respondent, v Theodore Rebich, Jr., Appellant, et al., Defendants.
[643 NYS2d 385]

Opinion:
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Peter C. Patsalos, J.), dated March 14, 1995, which granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
In support of its motion for summary judgment, the plaintiff sustained its initial burden of demonstrating its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see, Marine Midland Bank v Freedom Rd. Realty Assocs., 203 AD2d 538; LBV Props. v Green-port Dev. Co., 188 AD2d 588, 589). It thus became incumbent upon the defendant to allege facts in opposition which, if true, constitute a meritorious defense (see, Nassau Trust Co. v Montrose Concrete Prods. Corp., 56 NY2d 175, 182; Red Rock Holdings v Mandel, 220 AD2d 495). Giving the defendant the benefit of every favorable inference (see, Red Rock Holdings v Mandel, supra), he has failed to establish the existence of factual issues pertaining to the defenses of waiver and estoppel. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment. Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Pizzuto and Goldstein, JJ., concur.