Case Name: CONSTANTINE GRYBOWSKI, ADMINISTRATRIX, RESPONDENT, v. ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1916-06-19
Citations: 89 N.J.L. 361
Docket Number: 
Parties: CONSTANTINE GRYBOWSKI, ADMINISTRATRIX, RESPONDENT, v. ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 89
Pages: 361–362

Head Matter:
CONSTANTINE GRYBOWSKI, ADMINISTRATRIX, RESPONDENT, v. ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT.
Submitted March 27, 1916
Decided June 19, 1916.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 88 N. J. L. 1.
For the respondent, Frank M. Hardenbrook.
For the appellant, Collins & Corbin.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Gummere in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Ealisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 12.
For reversal—None.