Case Name: Pitts et al. v. Smith
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1920-01-27
Citations: 24 Ga. App. 700
Docket Number: 11037
Parties: Pitts et al. v. Smith.
Judges: Lulce and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 24
Pages: 700–700

Head Matter:
11037.
Pitts et al. v. Smith.
Decided January 27, 1920.
Trover; from Newton superior court—Judge Hutcheson. October 11, 1919.
Rogers & Knox, for plaintiff in error.
King & Johnson, contra.

Opinion:
Broyles, C. J.
1. Neither of the excerpts from the charge of the court complained of, when considered in the light of the entire charge and • the facts of the case, contains material error.
2. The 4th and 5th special grounds of the motion for a new trial are merely amplification of the usual general grounds. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Lulce and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.