Case Name: FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, LODGE NO. 5, and Robert S. Hurst, et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and Philadelphia Special Investigation Commission, et al.
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1986-12-05
Citations: 512 Pa. 636
Docket Number: Appeal No. 68 E.D. Appeal Dkt. 1986
Parties: FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, LODGE NO. 5, and Robert S. Hurst, et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and Philadelphia Special Investigation Commission, et al.
Judges: Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, HUTCHINSON, ZAPPALA and PAPADAKOS, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 512
Pages: 636–637

Head Matter:
518 A.2d 263
FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, LODGE NO. 5, and Robert S. Hurst, et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and Philadelphia Special Investigation Commission, et al.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued Dec. 1, 1986.
Decided Dec. 5, 1986.
Robert B. Mozenter, Anthony J. Molloy, Michael S. Durst, Philadelphia, for appellants.
Carl Singley, Philadelphia, for Special Investigation Com’n.
Ralph J. Teti, Philadelphia, for City of Philadelphia.
Gaele McLaughlin Barthold, Deputy Dist. Atty., for appellee.
Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, HUTCHINSON, ZAPPALA and PAPADAKOS, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
This Court accepted jurisdiction in this matter to consider the issue of the subpoena power of the Philadelphia Special Investigation Commission created pursuant to Executive Order No. 5-85 issued by the Honorable W. Wilson Goode on June 19, 1985. After review and argument, it appearing that said Commission did not, during the course of its investigation, attempt to exercise any subpoena power, nor was the question raised in the courts below, that issue is not properly before this Court. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as having been improvidently granted.