Case Name: Roberto DIAZ, Appellant, v. Frank SHER, W. Myra, Ronald Molko, and M & S Management Co., Inc., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-11-28
Citations: 553 So. 2d 280
Docket Number: No. 88-1016
Parties: Roberto DIAZ, Appellant, v. Frank SHER, W. Myra, Ronald Molko, and M & S Management Co., Inc., Appellees.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, BASKIN and COPE, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 553
Pages: 280–281

Head Matter:
Roberto DIAZ, Appellant, v. Frank SHER, W. Myra, Ronald Molko, and M & S Management Co., Inc., Appellees.
No. 88-1016.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 28, 1989.
Fleitas & Bujan and Jesus F. Bujan, Miami, for appellant.
Joe N. Unger; Mottlau & Abel, Miami, for appellees.
Before BARKDULL, BASKIN and COPE, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The summary judgment is affirmed. First, the issues presented by the appellees' motion for summary judgment were within the scope of the issues framed by the pleadings. See generally Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Benton, 467 So.2d 311, 313 (Fla.5th DCA 1985). Second, it appears without material dispute on the facts of the present case that the appellees were entitled to summary judgment. See Brien v. 18925 Collins Ave. Corp., 233 So.2d 847 (Fla.3d DCA 1970); see also Williams v. Wometco Enterprises, Inc., 287 So.2d 353 (Fla.3d DCA 1973), cert. denied, 294 So.2d 93 (Fla.1974). See generally Watson v. City of Hialeah, 552 So.2d 1146 (Fla.3d DCA 1989).
Affirmed.