Case Name: JULIUS BIELECKI, APPELLANT, v. MAX HERTZ LEATHER COMPANY, RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1926-02-01
Citations: 102 N.J.L. 432
Docket Number: 
Parties: JULIUS BIELECKI, APPELLANT, v. MAX HERTZ LEATHER COMPANY, RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 102
Pages: 432–433

Head Matter:
JULIUS BIELECKI, APPELLANT, v. MAX HERTZ LEATHER COMPANY, RESPONDENT.
Submitted October 29, 1925
Decided February 1, 1926.
For the appellant, Jacob L. Newman.
For the respondent, Joseph C. Paul.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 13.
For reversal — Rone.