Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carl A. EUBANKS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-07-20
Citations: 14 F. App'x 227
Docket Number: No. 01-6553
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carl A. EUBANKS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 14
Pages: 227–228

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carl A. EUBANKS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 01-6553.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 12, 2001.
Decided July 20, 2001.
Carl A. Eubanks, pro se. Bruce Howe Hendricks, Office of the United States Attorney, Charleston, SC, for appellee.
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Carl A. Eubanks seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court's order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United, States v. Eubanks, Nos. CR-97-110; CA-00-3645-2-18 (D.S.C. Mar. 15, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.