Case Name: JAMES O. BARTHOLOMEW, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE MAYOR, &c., OF THE CITY OF ELIZABETH, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1891-06
Citations: 53 N.J.L. 666
Docket Number: 
Parties: JAMES O. BARTHOLOMEW, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE MAYOR, &c., OF THE CITY OF ELIZABETH, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 53
Pages: 666–666

Head Matter:
JAMES O. BARTHOLOMEW, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE MAYOR, &c., OF THE CITY OF ELIZABETH, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR.
On error to the Supreme Court.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment in this case is affirmed, for the reasons given-by the court below.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice,. Depue, Dixon, Knapp, Magie, Reed, Clement, Smith,, Whitaker. 10.
For reversal—None.