Case Name: Eli SCHLER, Appellant, v. Bernard WEISS and Rosalyn Weiss, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-04-11
Citations: 541 So. 2d 166
Docket Number: No. 88-1371
Parties: Eli SCHLER, Appellant, v. Bernard WEISS and Rosalyn Weiss, Appellees.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., BARKDULL, J., and JOHN W. DELL, Associate Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 541
Pages: 166–166

Head Matter:
Eli SCHLER, Appellant, v. Bernard WEISS and Rosalyn Weiss, Appellees.
No. 88-1371.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 11, 1989.
Kenneth N. ReKant, Miami Beach, for appellant.
Floyd, Pearson, Richman, Greer, Weil, Zack & Brumbaugh and Debra Weiss Good-stone and Sally R. Doerner, Miami, for appellees.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., BARKDULL, J., and JOHN W. DELL, Associate Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The trial court correctly determined the merits of this case by summary judgment for the defendant. There is no basis, however, for deducting from the amounts admittedly due the plaintiff his alleged "pro rata share of the expenses" involved either in collecting the funds in question or in attorney's fees. The provision for a set-off for these amounts as provided in paragraph 1(0 is stricken from the final judgment which is otherwise affirmed.