Case Name: ST. LOUIS COUNTY, Respondent, v. Brett DARROW, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2011-08-20
Citations: 347 S.W.3d 165
Docket Number: No. ED 95832
Parties: ST. LOUIS COUNTY, Respondent, v. Brett DARROW, Appellant.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 347
Pages: 165–166

Head Matter:
ST. LOUIS COUNTY, Respondent, v. Brett DARROW, Appellant.
No. ED 95832.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Aug. 20, 2011.
Brett Darrow, St. Louis, MO, pro se.
Patricia Redington, Christopher J. McCarthy, Nakeyia S. Williams, St. Louis, Clayton, MO, for Respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Brett Darrow (Darrow) appeals from the trial court's judgment finding him guilty of speeding, in violation of St. Louis County Revised Ordinance Nos. 1204.020. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential or precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the trial court's judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).