Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Lee Harrison, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2017-09-13
Citations: 153 A.D.3d 1277
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lee Harrison, Appellant.
Judges: Eng, P.J., Balkin, Hall, Duffy and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 153
Pages: 1277–1278

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lee Harrison, Appellant.
[59 NYS3d 704]

Opinion:
Appeals by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from two sentences of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kron, J.), both imposed January 15, 2015, upon his pleas of guilty, on the ground that the sentences were excessive.
Ordered that the sentences are affirmed.
The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 267 [2011]; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133 [2014]), and thus, does not preclude review of the defendant's claim that the sentences were exces sive (see People v Villanti, 152 AD3d 801 [2017]). Moreover, contrary to the People's contention, the fact that the defendant received the negotiated sentences does not foreclose him from arguing that the sentences were excessive (see People v Thompson, 60 NY2d 513 [1983]). The sentences, however, were not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).
Eng, P.J., Balkin, Hall, Duffy and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.