Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. David JOHNSTON, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-04-11
Citations: 188 S.W.3d 476
Docket Number: No. ED 86568
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. David JOHNSTON, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before NANNETTE A. BAKER, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 188
Pages: 476–477

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. David JOHNSTON, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 86568.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
April 11, 2006.
Margaret Mueller Johnston, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jayne T. Woods — co-counsel, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before NANNETTE A. BAKER, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
David Johnston (Appellant) appeals from the trial court's judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of manufacturing methamphetamine and felony murder. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that there is sufficient evidence from which a reasonable juror might have found Appellant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Brooks, 158 S.W.3d 841, 847 (Mo.App. E.D.2005). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).