Case Name: Patricia I. Birnel, Appellant, v. The Town of Fircrest, Respondent
Court: Washington Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Washington
Decision Date: 1959-02-26
Citations: 53 Wash. 2d 830
Docket Number: No. 34857
Parties: Patricia I. Birnel, Appellant, v. The Town of Fircrest, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Washington Reports
Volume: 53
Pages: 830–830

Head Matter:
[No. 34857.
En Banc.
February 26, 1959.]
Patricia I. Birnel, Appellant, v. The Town of Fircrest, Respondent.
McMicken, Rupp & Schweppe, Mary Ellen Krug, and Fredric C. Tau-send, for appellant.
Crippen & Flynn, for respondent.
Reported in 335 P. (2d) 819.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Plaintiff commenced this action to have ordinance No. 323 of the town of Fircrest declared .unconstitutional.and,to enjoin the town from adding to the city water supply
". . . a source of fluoridation approved by the State Department of Health . . . under the rules and regulations of the State Board of Health, such addition to be administered in a manner approved by the State Department of Health."
A demurrer was sustained to plaintiff's amended complaint; she elected not to plead further and now appeals from a judgment dismissing her action with prejudice.
The judgment is affirmed on the authority of Kaul v. Chehalis, 45 Wn. (2d) 616, 277 P. (2d) 352 (1954).
It is so ordered.