Case Name: Arthur Langelo and Celia A. Langelo v. Gardner A. Greenhalgh
Court: Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Jurisdiction: Rhode Island
Decision Date: 1976-03-11
Citations: 116 R.I. 911
Docket Number: Appeal No. 76-19
Parties: Arthur Langelo and Celia A. Langelo v. Gardner A. Greenhalgh.
Judges: 
Reporter: Rhode Island Reports
Volume: 116
Pages: 911–912

Head Matter:
Appeal No. 76-19.
Arthur Langelo and Celia A. Langelo v. Gardner A. Greenhalgh.

Opinion:
Defendant moves to reconsider his motion to affirm which was recently denied. The basis for the motion to reconsider is a change of circumstances in that the case of one of the plaintiffs, Arthur F. Langelo, has now been dismissed by mutual agreement of the parties.
Beals & Di Fiore, Albert Di Fiore, for plaintiffs. Hanson, Curran, Bowen & Parks, David P. Whitman, for defendant.
Since court would have granted the motion to affirm but for the claim of Arthur F. Langelo, the defendant's motion to reconsider is granted and on reconsideration the motion to affirm the judgment below is granted.