Case Name: Louis Leibowitz and Rose Reich, Respondents, v. The City of Mount Vernon, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1937-12-24
Citations: 253 A.D. 758
Docket Number: 
Parties: Louis Leibowitz and Rose Reich, Respondents, v. The City of Mount Vernon, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 253
Pages: 758–758

Head Matter:
Louis Leibowitz and Rose Reich, Respondents, v. The City of Mount Vernon, Appellant.

Opinion:
The action is brought to recover damages caused by the unlawful act of the defendant in depositing materials upon the plaintiffs' property. The cause of action is trespass. Order directing an amendment of the verdict reversed on the law, and motion to amend denied. Judgment modified by reducing the amount thereof to the sum of $1,583, with interest, to be computed from the date of the verdict to the date of entry of judgment, and costs as taxed. As so modified, the judgment is unanimously affirmed, with costs of the appeal to defendant-appellant. The allowance of interest was not submitted to the jury, nor was any request made for such submission by the plaintiff. The allowance of interest was not a matter of right, but was within the discretion of the jury. (Mairs v. Manhattan Real Estate Assn., 89 N. Y. 498; Duryee v. Mayor, etc., of N. Y., 96 id. 477.) Wilson v. City of Troy (135 id. 96) is an authority for the proposition that interest is recoverable as of right in all actions for trespass. Under that decision the allowance of interest is for the jury where the trespass is of such a nature that the value of the property is merely diminished. Weprin & Glass Bldg. Corp. v. Rosoff Subway Constr. Co., Inc. (269 N. Y. 672) was an action in contract, and is, therefore, not in point. Hagarty, Davis, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.