Case Name: Joseph A. BLAINE, Appellant, v. Martin MARMOR and Goldie Marmor, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-11-14
Citations: 555 So. 2d 1241
Docket Number: No. 89-288
Parties: Joseph A. BLAINE, Appellant, v. Martin MARMOR and Goldie Marmor, Appellees.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and COPE, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 555
Pages: 1241–1242

Head Matter:
Joseph A. BLAINE, Appellant, v. Martin MARMOR and Goldie Marmor, Appellees.
No. 89-288.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 14, 1989.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 15, 1990.
Scott Greenfield, for appellant.
Genet & Milner and Donald G. Criscuolo, North Miami Beach, for appellees.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and COPE, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
As the record shows that appellant is a stranger to the note as to which he seeks to recover allegedly usurious payments, dismissal of plaintiff's action is affirmed. See Nesbitt v. Citicorp Savings, 514 So.2d 371 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).
Affirmed.