Case Name: Paula MCCULLOUGH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2017-01-31
Citations: 509 S.W.3d 153
Docket Number: WD 79532
Parties: Paula MCCULLOUGH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Division Three: Alok Ahuja, P.J., and Victor C. Howard and James E. Welsh, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 509
Pages: 153–153

Head Matter:
Paula MCCULLOUGH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
WD 79532
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
FILED: January 31, 2017
Mark A. Grothoff, Columbia, for appellant
Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., Jefferson City, for respondent
Before Division Three: Alok Ahuja, P.J., and Victor C. Howard and James E. Welsh, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Paula McCullough was convicted following a bench trial in the Circuit Court of St. Clair County of four counts of receiving stolen property. After her convictions were affirmed on direct appeal, McCullough filed a motion for postconviction relief under Supreme Court Rule 29.15. Her appointed counsel filed an amended motion. As relevant here, the amended motion alleged that the prosecution failed to disclose to the defense prior to trial that several of the prosecution's witnesses had previous criminal convictions. McCullough contended that she was entitled to a new trial due to the nondisclosure of this impeachment material. The circuit court denied relief following an evidentia-ry hearing. McCullough appeals. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties with an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).