Case Name: STATE of Florida, on relation of Joseph Ralph HAMILTON, individually, and as Executor and Personal Representative of Margery E. Hamilton, deceased, and John J. Lyons, as Guardian ad Litem of Joseph Anglin Hamilton and Ralph Embry Hamilton, minor legatees, Relators, v. John T. GRAHAM, as County Judge for Sarasota County, Florida, and Eunice Branch Hamilton, Thomas Anglin Hamilton and William Branch Hamilton, as Executors of the Estate of Frank T. Hamilton, deceased, Respondents
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1962-03-27
Citations: 139 So. 2d 757
Docket Number: No. 3163
Parties: STATE of Florida, on relation of Joseph Ralph HAMILTON, individually, and as Executor and Personal Representative of Margery E. Hamilton, deceased, and John J. Lyons, as Guardian ad Litem of Joseph Anglin Hamilton and Ralph Embry Hamilton, minor legatees, Relators, v. John T. GRAHAM, as County Judge for Sarasota County, Florida, and Eunice Branch Hamilton, Thomas Anglin Hamilton and William Branch Hamilton, as Executors of the Estate of Frank T. Hamilton, deceased, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 139
Pages: 757–757

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, on relation of Joseph Ralph HAMILTON, individually, and as Executor and Personal Representative of Margery E. Hamilton, deceased, and John J. Lyons, as Guardian ad Litem of Joseph Anglin Hamilton and Ralph Embry Hamilton, minor legatees, Relators, v. John T. GRAHAM, as County Judge for Sarasota County, Florida, and Eunice Branch Hamilton, Thomas Anglin Hamilton and William Branch Hamilton, as Executors of the Estate of Frank T. Hamilton, deceased, Respondents.
No. 3163.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.
March 27, 1962.

Opinion:
The relators having filed in this Court a •suggestion for the issuance of a writ of prohibition and applied for a rule nisi thereon, and the Court having considered the suggestion, the record and brief of the relators and the motion to dismiss filed by the respondents, it is
Ordered and adjudged that the application for rule nisi be and the same is hereby denied and the Suggestion for writ of prohibition is hereby dismissed.