Case Name: THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. Thomas A. BRATTEN, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1981-01-22
Citations: 393 So. 2d 550
Docket Number: No. 58277
Parties: THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. Thomas A. BRATTEN, Respondent.
Judges: BOYD, Acting C. J., and OVERTON, ENGLAND, ALDERMAN and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 393
Pages: 550–550

Head Matter:
THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. Thomas A. BRATTEN, Respondent.
No. 58277.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Jan. 22, 1981.
Harris K. Solomon, Branch Staff Counsel, Fort Lauderdale, James P. Hollaway, Deputy Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, and Michael B. Davis of Walton, Lantaff, Schroeder & Carson, West Palm Beach, for complainant.
Fred A. Hazouri, of Cone, Owen, Wagner, Nugent, Johnson, Hazouri & Roth, West Palm Beach, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This disciplinary proceeding by The Florida Bar against attorney Thomas A. Bratten is before the Court on complaint of The Florida Bar and Report of Referee. Pursuant to article XI, Rule 11.06(9)(b) of the Integration Rule of the Florida Bar, the referee's report and the record were filed with the Court.
No petition for review pursuant to article XI, Rule 11.09(1) having been filed, the referee's findings of fact are to be deemed conclusive. Fla.Bar Integr.Rule, art. XI, Rule 11.09(3)(f). We therefore approve the referee's recommendation that respondent be found not guilty of any misconduct.
Costs in the amount of $1,313.21 are hereby taxed against The Florida Bar.
It is so ordered.
BOYD, Acting C. J., and OVERTON, ENGLAND, ALDERMAN and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.