Case Name: Frankie L. MCCOY, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Patrick CONROY, Warden; Thomas Corcoran, Ex-Warden; Charles H. Bradberry, Case Manager; D. Howard, Case Manager; C. Alton, Case Manager; Unknown Named Defendants, Defendants are sued individual and official capacities, Defendants-Appellees, and B. Allen, Supervisor Case Management, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-11-23
Citations: 671 F. App'x 45
Docket Number: No. 16-6659
Parties: Frankie L. MCCOY, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Patrick CONROY, Warden; Thomas Corcoran, Ex-Warden; Charles H. Bradberry, Case Manager; D. Howard, Case Manager; C. Alton, Case Manager; Unknown Named Defendants, Defendants are sued individual and official capacities, Defendants-Appellees, and B. Allen, Supervisor Case Management, Defendant.
Judges: Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 671
Pages: 45–45

Head Matter:
Frankie L. MCCOY, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Patrick CONROY, Warden; Thomas Corcoran, Ex-Warden; Charles H. Bradberry, Case Manager; D. Howard, Case Manager; C. Alton, Case Manager; Unknown Named Defendants, Defendants are sued individual and official capacities, Defendants-Appellees, and B. Allen, Supervisor Case Management, Defendant.
No. 16-6659
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: October 25, 2016
Decided: November 23, 2016
Frankie L. McCoy, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Frankie L. McCoy, Sr., filed a lawsuit in the district court under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act, claiming that the Defendants discriminated against him on account of his physical disabilities. The district court granted summary judgment to the Defendants on the ground that McCoy settled the asserted claims in a settlement agreement reached in a prior action. McCoy now appeals.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McCoy v. Conroy, No. 1:01-cv-01581-JFM (D. Md. filed Apr. 15, 2016; entered Apr. 18, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED