Case Name: Disciplinary Counsel v. Johnson
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1999-03-04
Citations: 85 Ohio St. 3d 1411
Docket Number: 97-1754
Parties: Disciplinary Counsel v. Johnson.
Judges: 
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 85
Pages: 1411–1412

Head Matter:
97-1754.
Disciplinary Counsel v. Johnson.

Opinion:
On February 19, 1999, respondent Inza E. Johnson filed an application for reinstatement to the practice of law. Respondent attached to her application a document titled "Objections to the Findings and Recommendation of the Board." Whereas objections to the findings and recommendations of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline were due no later than September 25, 1997, respondent's submission of the objections at this time is prohibited by S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(1)(C). Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that respondent's application for reinstatement be, and hereby is, stricken.