Case Name: In the Matter of Daniel V. Hogan et al., Appellants, v. Sterling T. Goodspeed et al., Respondents; In the Matter of William E. Montgomery, III, Appellant, v. Sterling T. Goodspeed et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1993-08-26
Citations: 82 N.Y.2d 710
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Daniel V. Hogan et al., Appellants, v Sterling T. Goodspeed et al., Respondents. In the Matter of William E. Montgomery, III, Appellant, v Sterling T. Goodspeed et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 82
Pages: 710–712

Head Matter:
[622 NE2d 293, 602 NYS2d 793]
In the Matter of Daniel V. Hogan et al., Appellants, v Sterling T. Goodspeed et al., Respondents. In the Matter of William E. Montgomery, III, Appellant, v Sterling T. Goodspeed et al., Respondents.
Argued August 25, 1993;
decided August 26, 1993
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Thomas J. Spargo, East Berne, for appellants.
Bartlett Pontiff Stewart & Rhodes, Glens Falls (Richard J. Bartlett of counsel), for Sterling T. Goodspeed, respondent.
Thomas M. Lawson, County Attorney of Warren County, Lake George (Brian S. Reichenbach of counsel), for Warren County Board of Elections, respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On petitioner Montgomery's appeal, order affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the Per Curiam opinion at the Appellate Division (196 AD2d 675).
Appeal by petitioners Hogan and Freebern dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the two-Justice dissent at the Appellate Division was not a dissent in their favor (CPLR 5601 [a]).
Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Hancock, Jr., Bellacosa and Smith.