Case Name: Brian Lyle ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Greg FIZER; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-06-08
Citations: 436 F. App'x 799
Docket Number: No. 10-16547
Parties: Brian Lyle ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Greg FIZER; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: PREGERSON, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 436
Pages: 799–799

Head Matter:
Brian Lyle ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Greg FIZER; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 10-16547.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 24, 2011.
Filed June 8, 2011.
Brian Lyle Anderson, Florence, AZ, pro se.
Kelley J. Morrissey, Assistant Attorney General, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendants-Ap-pellees.
Before: PREGERSON, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Brian Lyle Anderson, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court's dismissal for failure to exhaust, and for clear error its factual determinations. Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1117 (9th Cir.2003). We affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Anderson's action because he failed to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing suit. See Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 85, 93-95, 126 S.Ct. 2378, 165 L.Ed.2d 368 (2006) ("proper exhaustion" is mandatory and requires adherence to administrative procedural rules); McKinney v. Carey, 311 F.3d 1198, 1199 (9th Cir.2002) (per curiam) (requiring exhaustion of administrative remedies prior to filing suit).
We do not consider facts presented for the first time on appeal. See United States v. Elias, 921 F.2d 870, 874 (9th Cir.1990) ("Documents or facts not presented to the district court are not part of the record on appeal.").
Anderson's remaining contentions are unpersuasive.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.