Case Name: BUCHANAN v. LOVING et al.
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1912-12-03
Citations: 35 Okla. 207
Docket Number: No. 4409
Parties: BUCHANAN v. LOVING et al.
Judges: All the Justices concur.
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 35
Pages: 207–207

Head Matter:
BUCHANAN v. LOVING et al.
No. 4409.
Opinion Filed December 3, 1912.
(128 Pac. 499.)
APPEAL AND EBBOE — Petition in Error — Case-Made—Filing. Syllabus same as itolater v. Strain, 31 Olda. 58, 119 Pac. 992.
(Syllabus by-the Court.)
Error from District Court, Jackson County; Frank Matthews, Judge.
Action between W. H. Buchanan and W. J. Loving and J. H. Loving. From the judgment, Buchanan brings error.
Dismissed.
Tisinger, Clay, Robinson & Hamilton, for plaintiff in error.
F. E. Gore, for defendants in error.

Opinion:
KANE, J-
This cause comes on to be heard upon a motion by the defendants in error to dismiss the appeal, upon the ground that the case-made and petition in error were not filed in the Supreme Court within six months after the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial in the district court was rendered. The record shows that the order overruling the motion for a new trial was entered on the 30th day of September, 1911, and that thé case-made was filed in the Supreme Court on the 30th day of September, 1912. As the Session Laws of 1911, c. 18, p. 35, requiring appeals to be taken in six months, became effective on the 14th day of June, 1911, the petition in error and case-made should have been filed within six months after the date of the rendition of judgment overruling the motion for new trial. Rolater v. Strain, 31 Okla. 58, 119 Pac. 992.
The appeal is therefore dismissed.
All the Justices concur.