Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Charley JOHNSON, Defendant/Appellant; Charley JOHNSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1993-11-30
Citations: 865 S.W.2d 448
Docket Number: Nos. 59933, 63304
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Charley JOHNSON, Defendant/Appellant. Charley JOHNSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANDALL, P.J. and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 865
Pages: 448–449

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Charley JOHNSON, Defendant/Appellant. Charley JOHNSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Nos. 59933, 63304.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Nov. 30, 1993.
S. Paige Canfield, St. Louis, for defendant-appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., David B. Cosgrove, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff-respondent.
Before CRANDALL, P.J. and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals his convictions, by a jury, of robbery in the first degree, § 569.-020, RSMo 1986; armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo 1986; burglary in the first degree, § 569.160, RSMo 1986; and attempt to commit robbery in the second degree, § 571.011, RSMo 1986. Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error on direct appeal are without merit. An opinion would have no prece-dential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.-25(b).
The judgment of the motion court denying defendant's Rule 29.15 motion is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).