Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Lorenzo MORRIS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-08-30
Citations: 17 F. App'x 191
Docket Number: No. 01-6718
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Lorenzo MORRIS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 17
Pages: 191–191

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Lorenzo MORRIS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 01-6718.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 23, 2001.
Decided Aug. 30, 2001.
Andrew Michael Sacks, Sacks & Sacks, Norfolk, VA, for appellant. Julie C. Dudley, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, VA, for appellee.
Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Michael Lorenzo Morris seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Morris, Nos. CR-94-46; CA-99-772-7 (W.D.Va. Feb. 28, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.