Case Name: Lenn A. IVY, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-11-20
Citations: 386 S.W.3d 210
Docket Number: No. ED 97899
Parties: Lenn A. IVY, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., C.J., ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J., and LISA K. PAGE, Sp. J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 386
Pages: 210–210

Head Matter:
Lenn A. IVY, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 97899.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Nov. 20, 2012.
Lisa M. Stroup, Missouri Public Defender Office, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Richard A. Starnes, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., C.J., ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J., and LISA K. PAGE, Sp. J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Lenn A. Ivy, Jr. appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying Ivy's request for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing. We affirm.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).