Case Name: ART & ART CORP., U.S.A., Appellant, v. Norman FRANK, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1994-03-08
Citations: 632 So. 2d 1123
Docket Number: No. 93-1879
Parties: ART & ART CORP., U.S.A., Appellant, v. Norman FRANK, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and LEVY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 632
Pages: 1123–1123

Head Matter:
ART & ART CORP., U.S.A., Appellant, v. Norman FRANK, Appellee.
No. 93-1879.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 8, 1994.
Gelb & Spatz and Carl A. Spatz, Miami, for appellant.
Rosen & Switkes and David Jove, Miami Beach, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and LEVY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The summary judgment for plaintiff entered below is reversed because of the existence of numerous genuine issues of material fact prominently including whether the note sued upon was supported by consideration, subject to a condition precedent, or both.