Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gilberto SANCHEZ-LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-05-30
Citations: 182 F. App'x 355
Docket Number: No. 05-40427
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gilberto SANCHEZ-LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 182
Pages: 355–357

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gilberto SANCHEZ-LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-40427.
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Decided May 30, 2006.
James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.
Timothy William Crooks, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Gilberto Sanchez-Lopez appeals his guilty-plea conviction of, and sentence for, violating 8 U.S.C. § 1326 by being found in the United States without permission after deportation. He challenges the constitutionality of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)'s treatment of prior felony and aggravated felony convictions as sentencing factors rather than elements of the offense that must be found by a jury in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Sanchez-Lopez's constitutional challenge is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although he contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi, we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Sanchez-Lopez properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.
Sanchez-Lopez also argues that the district court erred in imposing his sentence when it classified his state conviction as a drug trafficking offense that warranted a 12-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(B). Sanchez-Lopez is correct. North Carolina General Statute § 90-95, the state statute under which Sanchez-Lopez was convicted, is worded so that some, but not all, violations of the statute constitute a drug trafficking offense consistent with the guidelines definition. The offense for which Sanchez-Lopez was convicted, attempted conspiracy to traffic marihuana by possession, is not a "drug trafficking offense" as that term is defined for purposes of § 2L1.2(b)(1)(B). See Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d at 273-74; United States v. Gutierrez-Ramirez, 405 F.3d 352, 352-60, cert. denied, — U.S. —, 126 S.Ct. 217, 163 L.Ed.2d 198 (2005); United States v. Rodriguez-Duberney, 326 F.3d 613, 617 (5th Cir.2003); see also United States v. Meabe-Morales, 165 Fed.Appx. 347, 349 (5th Cir.2006).
We accordingly VACATE Sanchez-Lopez's sentence and REMAND for resentencing.
CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED; CASE REMANDED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.