Case Name: Robert D. HEROD and Paula J. Herod, Appellants, v. Darrell HINDMAN, individually, Century 21 Clifford Hindman Real Estate Company, JCTB Services, Inc. and The Branman Corporation, Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-09-23
Citations: 122 S.W.3d 597
Docket Number: No. ED 82566
Parties: Robert D. HEROD and Paula J. Herod, Appellants, v. Darrell HINDMAN, individually, Century 21 Clifford Hindman Real Estate Company, JCTB Services, Inc. and The Branman Corporation, Respondents.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J. and MARY R. RUSSELL, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 122
Pages: 597–598

Head Matter:
Robert D. HEROD and Paula J. Herod, Appellants, v. Darrell HINDMAN, individually, Century 21 Clifford Hindman Real Estate Company, JCTB Services, Inc. and The Branman Corporation, Respondents.
No. ED 82566.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Sept. 23, 2003.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 24, 2003.
Application for Transfer Denied Jan. 27, 2004.
Paul F. Devine, Jeffrey R. Wolfe, Vat-terott, Shaffar & Dolan, P.C., Maryland Heights, MO, for Appellants.
Mark A. Gonnerman, Helfrey, Simon & Jones, P.C., Terese A. Drew, Hinshaw, Culbertson, Ronald D. Robinson, Mark F. Mueller, Amelung, Wulff & Willenbrock, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for Respondents.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J. and MARY R. RUSSELL, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellants, Robert D. Herod and Paula J. Herod ("plaintiffs"), appeal the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County granting respondents', Darrell Hindman, Century 21 Clifford Hindman Real Estate Co., JCTB Services, Inc. and The Branman Corporation ("defendants"), motions for summary judgment. Plaintiffs brought suit against defendants for fraudulent misrepresentation and negligent misrepresentation. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).