Case Name: Andrew LAURA, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-12-20
Citations: 179 S.W.3d 468
Docket Number: No. ED 85719
Parties: Andrew LAURA, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before NANNETTE A. BAKER, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 179
Pages: 468–469

Head Matter:
Andrew LAURA, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 85719.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Dec. 20, 2005.
Timothy Joseph Forneris, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Deborah Daniels, Ronald Salvatore Ri-baudo, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent. .
Before NANNETTE A. BAKER, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Andrew Laura (Appellant) appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 24.035 amended motion to vacate, set aside, or correct judgment and sentence without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court did not clearly err. Jones v. State, 24 S.W.3d 701, 703 (Mo.App. E.D. 1999). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2004, unless otherwise indicated.