Case Name: Hill v. The State
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1923-07-10
Citations: 30 Ga. App. 619
Docket Number: 14664
Parties: Hill v. The State.
Judges: Luhe and Bloodioorth, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 30
Pages: 619–620

Head Matter:
14664.
Hill v. The State.
Decided July 10, 1923.

Opinion:
Broyles, O. J.
The testimony of the accomplice was sufficiently corroborated by the other facts and circumstance's of the case; the verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and none of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial requires a reversal of the judgment below.
Judgment affirmed.
Luhe and Bloodioorth, JJ., concur.
Indictment for making liquor; from Whitfield superior court — Judge Tarver. May 9, 1923.
M. B. Eubanks, for plaintiff in error.
J. M. Lang, solicitor-general, contra.