Case Name: Abraham Adler, Respondent, v. Samuel Lizan and Triangle Jewelry Co., Inc., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1927-05
Citations: 220 A.D. 779
Docket Number: 
Parties: Abraham Adler, Respondent, v. Samuel Lizan and Triangle Jewelry Co., Inc., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 220
Pages: 779–779

Head Matter:
Abraham Adler, Respondent, v. Samuel Lizan and Triangle Jewelry Co., Inc., Appellants.

Opinion:
Order denying motion to vacate notice of examination before trial affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. We think the subjects mentioned in the notice are matters concerning which the burden of proof rests with the plaintiff to maintain his action. While the use in the notice of the word " concerning," in referring to the various subjects, renders the scope of the examination somewhat indefinite, that is a matter which may be properly controlled and limited by the judge before whom the examination is held. Kelly, P. J., Young, Kapper, Lazansky and Hagarty, JJ., concur.