Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christian EASTWOOD, a.k.a. Kristo M. Springer, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-08-24
Citations: 107 F. App'x 808
Docket Number: No. 03-10016
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Christian EASTWOOD, a.k.a. Kristo M. Springer, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: PREGERSON, BEAM, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 107
Pages: 808–808

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Christian EASTWOOD, a.k.a. Kristo M. Springer, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 03-10016.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Oct. 8, 2003.
Submission Vacated Dec. 16, 2003.
Submitted Aug. 20, 2004.
Decided Aug. 24, 2004.
Camille Damm, Esq., Howard J. Zlotnick, Justin J. Roberts, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Las Vegas, NV, PlaintiffAppellee.
Anne R. Traum, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: PREGERSON, BEAM, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Honorable C. Arlen Beam, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
We need not state the facts of this case as they are known to the parties. Although we conclude that the appellant was in custody, we find that his statement that he possessed guns was voluntarily made and was not the result of interrogation or other coercion. See United States v. Allen, 699 F.2d 453, 459 (9th Cir.1982). Moreover, the guns were admissible because the exclusionary rule applicable to statements obtained in violation of Miranda does not extend to non-testimonial evidence that is seized as a result of unwarned, but voluntary, statements. See United States v. Patane, — U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 2620, 2630, 159 L.Ed.2d 667 (2004). Further, we conclude that the district court did not clearly err in determining that the appellant voluntarily consented to the search of his apartment. See United States v. Morning, 64 F.3d 531, 533 (9th Cir.1995).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.