Case Name: Rose A. Fried, Respondent, v. Samuel D. Fried, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1930-06
Citations: 230 A.D. 708
Docket Number: 
Parties: Rose A. Fried, Respondent, v. Samuel D. Fried, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 230
Pages: 708–708

Head Matter:
Rose A. Fried, Respondent, v. Samuel D. Fried, Appellant.

Opinion:
Order denying defendant's motion to vacate notice of examination before trial reversed upon the law, without costs, amd motion granted, without costs, upon the authority of Safrin v. Safrin (205 App. Div. 628); Horsch v. Horsch (206 id. 710) and Hutaff v. Hutaff (208 id. 745). Linnekin v. Linnekin (96 Misc. 56) is contrary to the weight of authority and should not be followed. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.