Case Name: UNITED MARINE, INC., Appellant, v. Lawrence RAILL, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-09-10
Citations: 584 So. 2d 1137
Docket Number: No. 91-678
Parties: UNITED MARINE, INC., Appellant, v. Lawrence RAILL, Appellee.
Judges: Before NESBITT, COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 584
Pages: 1137–1138

Head Matter:
UNITED MARINE, INC., Appellant, v. Lawrence RAILL, Appellee.
No. 91-678.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Sept. 10, 1991.
Bailey, Hunt, Jones & Busto, Richard M. Davis, Ellen S. Venzer, and Sara Soto, Miami, for appellant.
Greenberg, Traurig, Hoffman, Lipoff, Rosen & Quentel, David L. Ross, Marlene K. Silverman and Marc J. Gottlieb, Miami, for appellee.
Before NESBITT, COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
United Marine, Inc., appeals a temporary injunction entered in a suit on a covenant not to compete, asserting that it was entitled to greater injunctive relief than that granted by the trial court. "The granting or denying of a temporary injunction is a matter within the discretion of the trial court, and the exercise of such discretion will not be disturbed on appeal unless a clear showing is made that there was an abuse." Cordis Corp. v. Prooslin, 482 So.2d 486, 490-91 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). Cordis enumerates the factors to be considered, and no abuse of discretion in applying those factors has been shown. See also § 542.33, Fla.Stat. (Supp.1990).
Affirmed.