Case Name: INGRAM ENTERPRISES and Aetna Life & Casualty, Appellants, v. Mark LANGSTON, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-01-21
Citations: 611 So. 2d 115
Docket Number: No. 92-2079
Parties: INGRAM ENTERPRISES and Aetna Life & Casualty, Appellants, v. Mark LANGSTON, Appellee.
Judges: BOOTH, SMITH and WOLF, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 611
Pages: 115–115

Head Matter:
INGRAM ENTERPRISES and Aetna Life & Casualty, Appellants, v. Mark LANGSTON, Appellee.
No. 92-2079.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jan. 21, 1993.
Pamela L. Foels of Zimmerman, Shuf-field, Kiser & Sutcliffe, Orlando, for appellants.
Mark A. Zimmerman, Deland, for appel-lee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellants seek a remand in this workers' compensation appeal, showing that a transcript of the merits hearing cannot be prepared and the parties are unable to provide a satisfactory substitute for the transcript. In these circumstances, we find we must reverse and remand the order on appeal for a hearing de novo. See Arnold Lumber Co. v. Harris, 469 So.2d 786 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
BOOTH, SMITH and WOLF, JJ., concur.