Case Name: David J. BRINKLEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Cindy J. BRINKLEY, Respondent-Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1997-06-17
Citations: 947 S.W.2d 494
Docket Number: Nos. 70555, 70928
Parties: David J. BRINKLEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Cindy J. BRINKLEY, Respondent-Respondent.
Judges: Before CRAHAN, P.J., and GRIMM and HOFF, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 947
Pages: 494–495

Head Matter:
David J. BRINKLEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Cindy J. BRINKLEY, Respondent-Respondent.
Nos. 70555, 70928.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
June 17, 1997.
Law Offices of Michael L. Maynard, Michael L. Maynard, Park Hills, for Petitioner-Appellant.
Hollingsworth & Riehl, Partida A. Riehl, Hillsboro, for Respondent-Respondent.
Before CRAHAN, P.J., and GRIMM and HOFF, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, David J. Brinkley (Husband), appeals the trial court's judgment and decree of dissolution. Husband's points on appeal allege trial court error in division of marital property, award of maintenance, and attorney fees. We find the trial court did not abuse its discretion.
The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).