Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jorge Wilfredo RODRIGUEZ-PORTILLO, also known as Clemente Garcia Moreno, also known as Jose Garciapineda, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-03-12
Citations: 597 F. App'x 254
Docket Number: No. 14-20223
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jorge Wilfredo RODRIGUEZ-PORTILLO, also known as Clemente Garcia Moreno, also known as Jose Garciapineda, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 597
Pages: 254–255

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jorge Wilfredo RODRIGUEZ-PORTILLO, also known as Clemente Garcia Moreno, also known as Jose Garciapineda, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 14-20223
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 12, 2015.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Timothy William Crooks, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Jorge Wilfredo Rodríguez-Portillo, Welch, WV, pro se.
Before KING, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jorge Wilfredo Rodriguez-Portillo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Rodríguez-Portillo has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.