Case Name: Whirlpool Corporation, Appellant, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellee
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1991-08-27
Citations: 61 Ohio St. 3d 719
Docket Number: No. 90-920
Parties: Whirlpool Corporation, Appellant, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellee.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Douglas, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 61
Pages: 719–720

Head Matter:
Whirlpool Corporation, Appellant, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellee.
[Cite as Whirlpool Corp. v. Indus. Comm. (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 719.]
(No. 90-920
Submitted February 20, 1991
Decided August 27, 1991.)
Robert M. Anspach Associates, Robert M. Anspach and David P. Strup, for appellant.
Lee I. Fisher, Attorney General, William M. Mattes and Jeffery W. Clark, for appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment of the court of appeals, 1990 WL 34764, is affirmed on different grounds on the authority of Brady v. Safety-Kleen Corp. (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 624, 576 N.E.2d 722, decided this date. Furthermore, we order the cause dismissed for failure to state grounds upon which relief can be granted given this court's decision with respect to the constitutionality of R.C. 4121.80.
Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Douglas, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Holmes and Wright, JJ., dissent.