Case Name: John TURNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-08-16
Citations: 695 F. App'x 336
Docket Number: No. 16-16574
Parties: John TURNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 695
Pages: 336–337

Head Matter:
John TURNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-16574
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted August 9, 2017
Filed August 16, 2017
John Turner, Pro Se
Theresa Haar, AGNV—Office of the Nevada Attorney General (Las Vegas), Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellee
Before: SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
John Turner, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court's order denying his motion for relief from judgment following the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion, Bateman v. U.S. Postal Serv., 231 F.3d 1220, 1223 (9th Cir. 2000), and we affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Turner's motion for relief from judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(1) because Turner failed to inform the court of his change of address as required by United States District Court District of Nevada Local Rule 2-2, and failed to show excusable neglect. See id. at 1223-24 (discussing Pioneer-Briones factors to determine whether neglect is excusable).
All pending motions and requests are denied.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.