Case Name: TENSITRON, INC., Appellant, v. David BROMLEY, d/b/a Electromatic Equipment Company, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1966-11-03
Citations: 369 F.2d 699
Docket Number: No. 100, Docket 30338
Parties: TENSITRON, INC., Appellant, v. David BROMLEY, d/b/a Electromatic Equipment Company, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 369
Pages: 699–699

Head Matter:
TENSITRON, INC., Appellant, v. David BROMLEY, d/b/a Electromatic Equipment Company, Appellee.
No. 100, Docket 30338.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued Oct. 26, 1966.
Decided Nov. 3, 1966.
Robert E. Burns, New York City (Burns, Lobato & Zelnick, New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Lawrence F. Scinto, New York City (Ward, Haselton, McElhannon, Orme, Brooks & Fitzpatrick, New York City), for appellee.
Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and MOORE and KAUFMAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
We affirm Judge Dooling's finding that Tensitron's tension meter was "obvious" within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 103 and therefore not patentable. His well reasoned opinion is reported at 260 F.Supp. 457 (1966). It is unnecessary, therefore, for us to pass upon his finding that Bromley's device infringed claims 2, 3, 5, and 6 of Tensitron's patent.