Case Name: Herman Lewis BILLUPS, f/k/a Herman Billups, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Russell A. PERDUE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee, and Kuma J. Deboo, Warden, FCI Gilmer, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-01-20
Citations: 589 F. App'x 207
Docket Number: No. 14-7266
Parties: Herman Lewis BILLUPS, f/k/a Herman Billups, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Russell A. PERDUE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee, and Kuma J. Deboo, Warden, FCI Gilmer, Respondent.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 589
Pages: 207–207

Head Matter:
Herman Lewis BILLUPS, f/k/a Herman Billups, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Russell A. PERDUE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee, and Kuma J. Deboo, Warden, FCI Gilmer, Respondent.
No. 14-7266.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 15, 2015.
Decided: Jan. 20, 2015.
Herman Lewis Billups, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Herman Lewis Billups, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Billups v. Perdue, No. 2:14-cv-00007-JPB-RWT (ND.W.Va. Aug. 18, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because' the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.