Case Name: Thomalyn E. CONLIN, a minor, by and through her mother, Elizabeth L. Conlin, and Elizabeth L. Conlin, individually, and William E. Smith, Appellants, v. Diana HODSON, a minor, by and through her next friend and father, Douglas Hodson, and Douglas Hodson, individually, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1966-07-15
Citations: 188 So. 2d 870
Docket Number: No. 5372
Parties: Thomalyn E. CONLIN, a minor, by and through her mother, Elizabeth L. Conlin, and Elizabeth L. Conlin, individually, and William E. Smith, Appellants, v. Diana HODSON, a minor, by and through her next friend and father, Douglas Hodson, and Douglas Hodson, individually, Appellees.
Judges: ALLEN, C. J., HOBSON, J., and HOB-SON, T. FRANK, Sr., Associate Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 188
Pages: 870–871

Head Matter:
Thomalyn E. CONLIN, a minor, by and through her mother, Elizabeth L. Conlin, and Elizabeth L. Conlin, individually, and William E. Smith, Appellants, v. Diana HODSON, a minor, by and through her next friend and father, Douglas Hodson, and Douglas Hodson, individually, Appellees.
No. 5372.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.
July 15, 1966.
Kaleel, Kaleel, & Kaleel, and Mann, Harrison, Mann & Rowe, St. Petersburg, for appellants.
Masterson, Lloyd & Rogers, St. Peters-burg, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have decided that a lengthy opinion would add nothing to the jurisprudence of this State.
. After having listened attentively to arguments of counsel for the respective parties litigant, having studiously read their briefs, and having carefully examined the entire record before us, we have concluded that harmful and therefore reversible error has not been demonstrated.
The allegations of the complaint are sufficient to charge gross negligence on the part of Thomalyn E. Conlin and actionable, simple negligence upon the part of William E. Smith. There is in this record evidence which if believed by the jury (as it obviously was) is sufficient to justify the verdict of the jury and the judgment entered pursuant thereto. The learned Circuit Judge did not err in submitting this case to the jury.
The oppugned judgment should be and it is hereby—
Affirmed.
ALLEN, C. J., HOBSON, J., and HOB-SON, T. FRANK, Sr., Associate Judge, concur.