Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lester Javier GUADAMUZ-SOLIS, a.k.a. Lester Javier Guadamuz-Solio, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2000-11-14
Citations: 232 F.3d 1363
Docket Number: No. 00-11508
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lester Javier GUADAMUZ-SOLIS, a.k.a. Lester Javier Guadamuz-Solio, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before BARKETT and WILSON, Circuit Judges, and GEORGE, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 232
Pages: 1363–1363

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lester Javier GUADAMUZ-SOLIS, a.k.a. Lester Javier Guadamuz-Solio, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 00-11508.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Nov. 14, 2000.
Henry P Bell, Asst. Fed. Pub. Def., Kathleen M. Williams, Fed. Pub. Def., Miami, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Harriet Galvin, Asst. U.S. Atty., Anne R. Schultz, Dawn Bowen, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Before BARKETT and WILSON, Circuit Judges, and GEORGE, District Judge.
Honorable Lloyd D. George, U.S. District Judge for the District of Nevada, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER'CURIAM:
Lester Javier Guadamuz-Solis ("Solis") appeals his sentence of 96 months' imprisonment and 3 years' supervised release for a conviction for illegal reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b)(2). He argues that Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000) has called into question the decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which controls this case. Almenda-rez-Torres remains the law until the Supreme Court determines that Almenda-rez-Torres is not controlling precedent. Accordingly, we
AFFIRM.