Case Name: George T. Caulfield, Respondent, v. Joseph Weil and Herman Rahn, Defendants, and Richard Flauto, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1931-03
Citations: 232 A.D. 828
Docket Number: 
Parties: George T. Caulfield, Respondent, v. Joseph Weil and Herman Rahn, Defendants, and Richard Flauto, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 232
Pages: 828–828

Head Matter:
George T. Caulfield, Respondent, v. Joseph Weil and Herman Rahn, Defendants, and Richard Flauto, Appellant.

Opinion:
Order granting plaintiff's motion for a preference reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The record discloses without dispute that the plaintiff is not a resident of Kings county. He may not, therefore, have a preference granted to him in an action which should have been brought in Queens county, since plaintiff and all the defendants are residents of that county. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ., concur.