Case Name: Ex parte Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1929-05-20
Citations: 279 U.S. 822
Docket Number: No. 19, original
Parties: Ex parte Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 279
Pages: 822–823

Head Matter:
No. 19, original.
Ex parte Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.
Return to rule presented April 22, 1929.
Decided May 20, 1929.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
Upon examination of the returns to the nile to show cause, the Court finds that the reasons given by the respondent, the District Judge for the Northern District of Florida, that the case is likely to become moot, are not sufficient to justify his failure, immediately upon application, to call to his assistance, to hear and determine the application, two other judges, in accord with the provisions for direct review by this Court of the District Court, under § 4 of 238 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of February 13, 1925, c. 229, 43 Stat. 936. See Virginian Ry. v. United States, 272 U. S. 658, 672. And the rule against the respondent is made absolute, and directed to be certified to him for due observance thereof. We assume it will not be necessary to issue a formal writ.
Messrs. F. B. Grier, W. E. Kay, and Robert C. Alston for petitioner.