Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Joseph L. JANOSKI, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1992-12-15
Citations: 842 S.W.2d 576
Docket Number: No. 61845
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Joseph L. JANOSKI, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 842
Pages: 576–576

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Joseph L. JANOSKI, Defendant/Appellant.
No. 61845.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Dec. 15, 1992.
Claude Hanks, Chesterfield, for defendant/ appellant.
William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Robert Alan Kelly, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff/respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals his conviction and sentence for stealing property with a value of at least $150, § 570.080, RSMo 1986. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no prece-dential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).