Case Name: George DUNDAS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ronald HUTCHINSON; Attorney General for the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-01-24
Citations: 2 F. App'x 332
Docket Number: No. 00-7140
Parties: George DUNDAS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ronald HUTCHINSON; Attorney General for the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 2
Pages: 332–332

Head Matter:
George DUNDAS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ronald HUTCHINSON; Attorney General for the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 00-7140.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 18, 2001.
Decided Jan. 24, 2001.
George Dundas, pro se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, for appellees.
Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
George Dundas seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Dundas v. Hutchinson, No. CA-99-3612-PJM (D.Md. Aug. 3, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.