Case Name: J. W. Peterson, Plaintiff in Error, v. Oscar Daniels Company, a Corporation, Defendant in Error
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1922-01-19
Citations: 83 Fla. 29
Docket Number: 
Parties: J. W. Peterson, Plaintiff in Error, v. Oscar Daniels Company, a Corporation, Defendant in Error.
Judges: All concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 83
Pages: 29–30

Head Matter:
J. W. Peterson, Plaintiff in Error, v. Oscar Daniels Company, a Corporation, Defendant in Error.
Decision Filed January 19, 1922.
A Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; F. M. Robles, Judge.
Gibson & Biherd, for Plaintiff in Error;
Knight, Thompson & Turner, for Defendant in Error.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
In an action for- personal injuries, judgment was rendered for the defendant on a demurrer to the declaration and plaintiff took writ .of error. The declaration is needlessly prolix, but as the allegations do not by repugnance- destroy each other, and as the declaration does not wholly fail to state a cause of action,- the demurrer should have been overruled. See Catts v. Henderson, 81 Fla. 138, 87 South. Rep. 313; Florida East Coast Ry. Co. v. City of Miami, Fla. 80 Fla. 329, 86 South. Rep. 308. Admiralty is not involved. 254 U. S. 242.
Reversed.
All concur.