Case Name: Leonard Heimerdinger and Another, Copartners, Doing Business under the Firm Name of Leonard Heimerdinger & Co., Appellants, v. Paul C. Schnitzler, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1930-05-22
Citations: 136 Misc. 814
Docket Number: 
Parties: Leonard Heimerdinger and Another, Copartners, Doing Business under the Firm Name of Leonard Heimerdinger & Co., Appellants, v. Paul C. Schnitzler, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 136
Pages: 814–815

Head Matter:
Leonard Heimerdinger and Another, Copartners, Doing Business under the Firm Name of Leonard Heimerdinger & Co., Appellants, v. Paul C. Schnitzler, Respondent.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
May 22, 1930.
Edwin A. Falk, for the appellants;
Schnitzler, Thorn & Dayton [Philip F. Farley of counsel], for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The meaning of the phrase " seller's 60 days " was established without contradiction. The holding to the contrary was, therefore, without any evidence to support it.
Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and judgment directed for plaintiff as prayed for, with interest and costs.
Bijur and Peters, JJ., concur; Callahan, J., dissents.