Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. CHRISTOPHER LAMONT MARCELL, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1999-09-22
Citations: 163 Or. App. 115
Docket Number: 941137782; CA A89035
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. CHRISTOPHER LAMONT MARCELL, Appellant.
Judges: Before De Muniz, Presiding Judge, and Haselton and Wollheim, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 163
Pages: 115–116

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted August 24,
reversed and remanded with instructions to vacate judgment September 22, 1999
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. CHRISTOPHER LAMONT MARCELL, Appellant.
(941137782; CA A89035)
985 P2d 238
Jesse Wm. Barton, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was David E. Groom, Public Defender.
Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.
Before De Muniz, Presiding Judge, and Haselton and Wollheim, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
At oral argument the state conceded that none of the alleged predicate offenses could be used to support the racketeering conviction. See State v. Harris, 157 Or App 119, 967 P2d 909 (1998). We accept the state's concession.
Reversed and remanded with instructions to vacate judgment.