Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dion Levering WILLIAMS, a/k/a Tion Williams, a/k/a Scroll, a/k/a Squirrel, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-08-29
Citations: 668 F. App'x 476
Docket Number: No. 16-6254
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dion Levering WILLIAMS, a/k/a Tion Williams, a/k/a Scroll, a/k/a Squirrel, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 668
Pages: 476–477

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dion Levering WILLIAMS, a/k/a Tion Williams, a/k/a Scroll, a/k/a Squirrel, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-6254
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: August 25, 2016
Decided: August 29, 2016
Dion Levering Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Sinclair Duffey, Michael Ronald Gill, Assistant United States Attorneys, Richmond, Virginia; Jamie L. Mickelson, Assistant United States Attorney, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Dion Levering Williams appeals the district court's order denying his motion to reconsider the court's order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion to reduce his sentence. Because the district court lacked jurisdiction to consider Williams' motion for reconsideration, we affirm the denial of relief. See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir. 2010) (holding that district court lacks authority to grant motion to reconsider ruling on § 3582(c)(2) motion). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED