Case Name: Henry MASHBURN and Margaret Mashburn, Appellants, v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1986-06-03
Citations: 489 So. 2d 1194
Docket Number: No. 85-2587
Parties: Henry MASHBURN and Margaret Mashburn, Appellants, v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellee.
Judges: Before NESBITT, DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 489
Pages: 1194–1194

Head Matter:
Henry MASHBURN and Margaret Mashburn, Appellants, v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellee.
No. 85-2587.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
June 3, 1986.
Rehearing Denied July 14, 1986.
Baron & Budd and Jane N. Saginaw, Dallas, Tex., and Louis S. Robles, Miami, for appellants.
Shackleford, Farrior,. Stallings & Evans and Raymond Elligett, Jr. and Charles P. Schropp, Tampa, for appellee.
Before NESBITT, DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The summary judgment in favor of the defendants is reversed on the ground that there exists a genuine issue of fact as to when Mashburn knew or should have known of the facts giving rise to his cause of action. Copeland v. Armstrong Cork Co., 447 So.2d 922 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), affirmed in part, quashed in part, 471 So.2d 533 (Fla.1985).
Reversed.