Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward Blaine MINTZ, a/k/a Edward Blain Mintz, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-05-06
Citations: 520 F. App'x 225
Docket Number: No. 12-8003
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward Blaine MINTZ, a/k/a Edward Blain Mintz, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 520
Pages: 225–226

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward Blaine MINTZ, a/k/a Edward Blain Mintz, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-8003.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 25, 2013.
Decided: May 6, 2013.
Edward Blaine Mintz, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Edward Blaine Mintz appeals the district court's order denying his motion to appoint new counsel and for an extension of time to file a motion to reconsider the denial of his motion to reduce sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Mintz, No. 1:08-cr-00040-MR-l (W.D.N.C. Nov. 7, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.