Case Name: Margaret McArthur, Respondent, v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2000-07-03
Citations: 274 A.D.2d 378
Docket Number: 
Parties: Margaret McArthur, Respondent, v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 274
Pages: 378–378

Head Matter:
Margaret McArthur, Respondent, v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendant.
[711 NYS2d 760]

Opinion:
—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for malicious prosecution, the defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.), dated May 17, 1999, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the plaintiff and against it in the total sum of $52,617.97.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
No proper foundation was laid for admission of a copy of the videotape in lieu of the missing original (see, Dipace v Hertz Corp., 30 AD2d 515).
The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J. P., Joy, Goldstein and H. Miller, JJ., concur.