Case Name: In the Interest of: T.T.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2011-03-15
Citations: 333 S.W.3d 544
Docket Number: No. ED 95434
Parties: In the Interest of: T.T.
Judges: Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 333
Pages: 544–544

Head Matter:
In the Interest of: T.T.
No. ED 95434.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
March 15, 2011.
Karen A. Siegel, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Diara Cross, Guardian Ad Litem, St. Louis, MO, for Juvenile.
Gary L. Gardner, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
W.T. appeals from the trial court's judgment terminating his parental rights to his daughter contending there was insufficient evidence supporting the grounds for termination' and the court's finding that termination was in the best interests of the child. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court's finding that grounds for termination of W.T.'s parental rights existed is supported by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence and that the court's finding that termination was in the best interests of the child is supported by a preponderance of the evidence. In re E.F.B.D., 245 S.W.3d 316, 319 (Mo.App. S.D.2008). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).