Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Herman Lee INGRAM, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-04-22
Citations: 424 F. App'x 252
Docket Number: No. 11-6108
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Herman Lee INGRAM, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 424
Pages: 252–252

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Herman Lee INGRAM, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-6108.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 8, 2011.
Decided: April 22, 2011.
Herman Lee Ingram, Appellant Pro Se. Olivia L. Norman, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Herman Lee Ingram appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Ingram, No. 3:05-cr-00361-HEH-1 (E.D.Va. Dec. 21, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED