Case Name: Spellum, Respondent, vs. La Crosse & Southeastern Railway Company, Appellant
Court: Wisconsin Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Wisconsin
Decision Date: 1912-01-30
Citations: 148 Wis. 290
Docket Number: 
Parties: Spellum, Respondent, vs. La Crosse & Southeastern Railway Company, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Wisconsin Reports
Volume: 148
Pages: 290–290

Head Matter:
Spellum, Respondent, vs. La Crosse & Southeastern Railway Company, Appellant.
January 13
January 30, 1912.
Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Vernon county: E. C. Higbee, Circuit Judge.
Affirmed.
Action to recover compensation on account of taking lands for railway right-of-way purposes. The cause was submitted to the jury on the evidence, resulting in a verdict in plaintiff’s favor upon which judgment was rendered.
For the appellant there was a brief by ~Wm. S. Burroughs and Chas. W. Gh-aves, and oral argument by Mr. Burroughs.
For the respondent there was a brief by TV. F. & A. C. Wolfe, and oral argument by TV. F. Wolfe.

Opinion:
Marshall, J.
The same points are raised in this case as in Hauge v. La Crosse & Southeastern R. Co., ante, p. 288. The circumstances in the two cases being alike, the judgment must be affirmed for th& reasoning stated for affirming that in the other case.
By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.