Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DOROTHY S. WALDRIP, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1992-12-16
Citations: 117 Or. App. 249
Docket Number: 91NB-1519, 91NB-1696, 91CR-2515; CA A73229, A73230, A73231
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DOROTHY S. WALDRIP, Appellant.
Judges: Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Joseph, Chief Judge, and Deits, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 117
Pages: 249–250

Head Matter:
Submitted on record and briefs October 30,
convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing December 16, 1992
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DOROTHY S. WALDRIP, Appellant.
(91NB-1519, 91NB-1696, 91CR-2515; CA A73229 (Control), A73230, A73231)
842 P2d 467
Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, and Alan H. Biedermann, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, filed the brief for appellant.
Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and J. Dean Taylor, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Joseph, Chief Judge, and Deits, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant was convicted of driving under the influence of intoxicants in 3 separate cases. In each, the court imposed a jail term, suspended execution of a portion of that sentence and placed defendant on probation. The state concedes that the court did not have the authority at the same time to impose and order executed a sentence of incarceration and to place defendant on probation. State v. McMellon, 110 Or App 441, 823 P2d 996 (1992); State v. Vasby, 101 Or App 1, 788 P2d 1024 (1990). We accept the concession.
Defendant's other assignments of error are moot.
Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing.