Case Name: CURTIS v. AMERICAN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO. et al.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1930-02-13
Citations: 38 F.2d 476
Docket Number: No. 4194
Parties: CURTIS v. AMERICAN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO. et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 38
Pages: 476–477

Head Matter:
CURTIS v. AMERICAN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO. et al.
No. 4194.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Feb. 13, 1930.
N. J. Curtis, of Ridgwood, N. J., in pro per.
Geo. G. Tennant, of Jersey City, N. J., for respondent.
Before BUFFINGTON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and THOMPSON, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
It appearing in this matter that a final decree was entered in the ease, we are of opinion, after argument and due consideration had, that the appropriate remedy in such case is an appeal and not a mandamus.
The petition for the latter relief is therefore denied.