Case Name: Alfred R. SOSA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joe MCGRATH, Warden; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-01-27
Citations: 164 F. App'x 642
Docket Number: No. 05-16456
Parties: Alfred R. SOSA, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Joe MCGRATH, Warden; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before: T.G. NELSON, SILVERMAN and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 164
Pages: 642–642

Head Matter:
Alfred R. SOSA, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Joe MCGRATH, Warden; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
No. 05-16456.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 23, 2006.
Decided Jan. 27, 2006.
Alfred R. Sosa, Crescent City, CA, pro se.
Before: T.G. NELSON, SILVERMAN and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
A review of the record and the opening brief indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United, States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.
All pending motions are denied as moot.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.