Case Name: Alfred A. COSENTINO and David B. Gam, d/b/a Cosentino and Gam, Engineers, Appellants, v. Jerome ELSON and Heiman and Crary, P.A., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1972-06-20
Citations: 263 So. 2d 253
Docket Number: No. 72-41
Parties: Alfred A. COSENTINO and David B. Gam, d/b/a Cosentino and Gam, Engineers, Appellants, v. Jerome ELSON and Heiman and Crary, P.A., Appellees.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 263
Pages: 253–254

Head Matter:
Alfred A. COSENTINO and David B. Gam, d/b/a Cosentino and Gam, Engineers, Appellants, v. Jerome ELSON and Heiman and Crary, P.A., Appellees.
No. 72-41.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
June 20, 1972.
Robert J. Ramer, Coral Gables, for appellants.
Heiman & Crary and Charles L. Neu-stein, Miami, for appellees.
Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The order of the trial court, here under review, be and the same is hereby affirmed. Funds in escrow are not subject to garnishment [see: 6 Am.Jur.2d, Attachment and Garnishment, § 125; 28 Am.Jur.2d, Escrow, § 10; 38 C.J.S. Garnishment § 77c(l); Anno. 10 A.L.R. 741] except where all conditions of the escrow had been completed and the funds without dispute are due to a judgment debtor.
Affirmed.