Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. William Wilbert HAACKE, Defendant/Appellant; William Wilbert HAACKE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1991-11-19
Citations: 823 S.W.2d 70
Docket Number: Nos. 57852, 59467
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. William Wilbert HAACKE, Defendant/Appellant. William Wilbert HAACKE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 823
Pages: 70–71

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. William Wilbert HAACKE, Defendant/Appellant. William Wilbert HAACKE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 57852, 59467.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Nov. 19, 1991.
Loyce Hamilton, St. Louis, for defendant/appellant.
William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Joseph P. Murray, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff/respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals from a conviction and judgment for manufacturing marijuana in violation of § 195.020, RSMo 1986 (repealed 1989) and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgments are affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).