Case Name: Howard W. Sessions v. Arthur S. Sachs et al.
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1969-01-09
Citations: 157 Conn. 600
Docket Number: 
Parties: Howard W. Sessions v. Arthur S. Sachs et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 157
Pages: 600–601

Head Matter:
Howard W. Sessions v. Arthur S. Sachs et al.
King, C. X, Alcorn, House, Cotter and Ryan, Js.
Argued January 9
decided January 9, 1969
Howard W. Sessions, pro se, the appellant (plaintiff).
David B. Beiser, assistant attorney general, with whom were F. Michael Ahern, assistant attorney general, and, on the brief, Robert K. Killian, attorney general, for the appellees (defendants).

Opinion:
Pee Curiam.
The court properly sustained the demurrer to the plaintiff's prayers for relief. Practice Book § 108; Holley v. McDonald, 154 Conn. 228, 233, 224 A.2d 727; State ex rel. Scala v. Airport Commission, 154 Conn. 168, 176, 224 A.2d 236; Boyko v. Weiss, 147 Conn. 183, 186, 158 A.2d 253; Glens Falls Ins. Co. v. Somers, 146 Conn. 708, 713, 156 A.2d 146. It is not necessary to consider the court's action granting the defendants' motion to expunge an amendment to the complaint since a first notice of dismissal, dated February 15, 1967, was rescinded, and the plaintiff concedes that he took no appeal from the notice of dismissal dated March 7, 1967.
There is no error.