Case Name: In re: Ralph N. PEYTON and Mary S. Peyton, Debtors. Tustin Thrift & Loan Association, Appellant, v. Ralph N. Peyton; Mary S. Peyton, Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-12-27
Citations: 23 F. App'x 839
Docket Number: No. 00-17531; BAP No. NC-00-01281-RRyP
Parties: In re: Ralph N. PEYTON and Mary S. Peyton, Debtors. Tustin Thrift & Loan Association, Appellant, v. Ralph N. Peyton; Mary S. Peyton, Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 23
Pages: 839–840

Head Matter:
In re: Ralph N. PEYTON and Mary S. Peyton, Debtors. Tustin Thrift & Loan Association, Appellant, v. Ralph N. Peyton; Mary S. Peyton, Appellees.
No. 00-17531.
BAP No. NC-00-01281-RRyP.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Dec. 17, 2001 .
Decided Dec. 27, 2001.
Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, TROTT and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Tustin Thrift & Loan Association ("Tustin") appeals the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's ("BAP") judgment affirming a bankruptcy judge's order discharging Ralph and Mary Peyton's debt to Tustin. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We independently review the bankruptcy court's rulings on appeal from the BAP, Cool Fuel, Inc. v. Bd. of Equalization (In re Cool Fuel, Inc.), 210 F.3d 999, 1001-02 (9th Cir.2000), and we affirm.
Because the Peytons disclosed information about their other loan obligation and did not make any misrepresentations to the original lender, the bankruptcy court did not err by finding that the Peytons lacked the requisite intent to defraud Tustin. See 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(B).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.