Case Name: Lillian Lee MARICONDA, Appellant, v. Erwin A. PETRUSER, a/k/a Erwin Petrusek, and Betty Petruser, a/k/a Betty Petrusek, and Continental Insurance Company, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1979-04-03
Citations: 369 So. 2d 105
Docket Number: No. 78-1336
Parties: Lillian Lee MARICONDA, Appellant, v. Erwin A. PETRUSER, a/k/a Erwin Petrusek, and Betty Petruser, a/k/a Betty Petrusek, and Continental Insurance Company, Appellees.
Judges: Before PEARSON, HENDRY and HUB-BART, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 369
Pages: 105–105

Head Matter:
Lillian Lee MARICONDA, Appellant, v. Erwin A. PETRUSER, a/k/a Erwin Petrusek, and Betty Petruser, a/k/a Betty Petrusek, and Continental Insurance Company, Appellees.
No. 78-1336.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 3, 1979.
Hodges, Gossett, Weiss, McDonald & Wakefield and Perry W. Hodges, Jr., Hollywood, for appellant.
Corlett, Merritt, Killian & Sikes and Gerald E. Rosser, Miami, for appellees.
Before PEARSON, HENDRY and HUB-BART, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Two points are presented on this appeal, one being procedural and the other going to the substantive basis for the final judgment entered. The procedural point does not present reversible error under the principles stated in Marsh v. Sarasota County, 97 So.2d 312 (Fla. 2d DCA 1957). Having passed the procedural question, an examination of the record reveals that the judgment is adequately supported by the evidence presented.
Affirmed.