Case Name: Ex parte Bettye Fine COLLINS et al. (Re Andrew HAYDEN et al. v. Bettye Fine COLLINS et al.)
Court: Mississippi Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Mississippi
Decision Date: 1998-06-19
Citations: 717 So. 2d 771
Docket Number: 1970356
Parties: Ex parte Bettye Fine COLLINS et al. (Re Andrew HAYDEN et al. v. Bettye Fine COLLINS et al.).
Judges: HOOPER, C.J., and MADDOX, ALMON, HOUSTON, KENNEDY, COOK, and LYONS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 717
Pages: 771–772

Head Matter:
Ex parte Bettye Fine COLLINS et al. (Re Andrew HAYDEN et al. v. Bettye Fine COLLINS et al.).
1970356.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
June 19, 1998.
Albert L. Jordan and Michael L. Jackson of Wallace, Jordan, Ratliff & Brandt, L.L.C., Birmingham; Algert S. Agricola, Jr., of Wallace, Jordan, Ratliff & Brandt, L.L.C., Montgomery; and Mark L. Gaines, Birmingham, for petitioners Bettye Fine Collins, Vince Amaro, and Robert T. Reese, Sr.
John J. Park, Jr., asst. atty. gen., for respondent Secretary of State James Bennett.
Borden M. Ray, Jr., of Ray, Oliver & Ward, Tuscaloosa, for respondent Sandra Ray.
James U. Blacksher, Birmingham; Terry G. Davis, Montgomery; and Solomon S. Seay, Jr., Montgomery, for respondents Andrew Hayden, Rubin McKinnon, Bernest Brooks, Quinton Ross, and Darryl Sinkfield.
Thomas N. Carruthers and Kenneth 0. Simon of Bradley, Arant, Rose & White, Birmingham, for respondents Bradley Byrne, Ethel Hall, G.J. “Dutch” Higginbotham, Willie Paul, and Mary Jane Caylor.
Robert W. Weinberg, asst. atty. gen., for respondent Judge Eugene W. Reese.

Opinion:
SHORES, Justice.
This mandamus petition involves the restructuring of single-member districts for the election of the members of the Alabama State Board of Education and this Court's September 29, 1995, order remanding the underlying case to the Circuit Court of Montgomery County. See Collins v. Bennett, 684 So.2d 681 (Ala.1995). The plaintiff-interve-nors in this action have petitioned for a writ of mandamus directing the circuit judge to vacate a consent judgment and to dismiss the pending case in light of the United States district court's decision in Sahag v. Mitchell, CV-96-AR-307-M July 3, 1996 (N.D.Ala.1996) (not published in F.Supp.).
We grant the writ. The mandate of this Court issued in the cases addressed in Collins v. Bennett, supra (cases 1930468 and 1930543), is vacated. The trial judge is directed to vacate the consent judgment of August 5, 1993, and to grant the joint motion to dismiss the pending action.
WRIT GRANTED.
HOOPER, C.J., and MADDOX, ALMON, HOUSTON, KENNEDY, COOK, and LYONS, JJ., concur.