Case Name: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-IN-ERROR, v. PASQUALE De GRESCENZO, PLAINTIFF-IN-ERROR
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1926-08-10
Citations: 4 N.J. Misc. 713
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-IN-ERROR, v. PASQUALE De GRESCENZO, PLAINTIFF-IN-ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 4
Pages: 713–713

Head Matter:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-IN-ERROR, v. PASQUALE De GRESCENZO, PLAINTIFF-IN-ERROR.
Decided August 10, 1926.
Before Gummeke, Chiet? Justice, and Justices Kausch and Campbell.
Por the plaintiff in error, Charles A. Bathbun.
Por the defendant in error, Albert II. Holland.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This writ removes for review a judgment of conviction for arson and brings np the whole trial proceedings under section 136 of the Criminal Procedure act. There is only one cause for reversal that needs our attention, and that is that the verdict upon which the judgment is founded is not supported by the weight of the evidence. As our examination of "the proofs brings us to this conclusion, the judgment below must be reversed.