Case Name: Mark MOFFETT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-02-18
Citations: 613 So. 2d 147
Docket Number: No. 91-3902
Parties: Mark MOFFETT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ZEHMER, ALLEN and WEBSTER, JJ„ concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 613
Pages: 147–147

Head Matter:
Mark MOFFETT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 91-3902.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Feb. 18, 1993.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and James W. Rogers, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellant challenges his habitual offender sentence, arguing that the court failed to make the requisite findings under section 775.084, Florida Statutes. Because the appellant expressly agreed to be sentenced as a habitual offender, the necessity of specific findings under the statute was waived. See Cato v. State, 611 So.2d 22 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Robinson v. State, 605 So.2d 500 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). The challenged sentenced is therefore affirmed.
ZEHMER, ALLEN and WEBSTER, JJ" concur.