Case Name: Mary L. Sherman et al., Appellants, v. Claire Manufacturing Company, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Newburgh Enlarged School District, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1997-09-23
Citations: 90 N.Y.2d 933
Docket Number: 
Parties: Mary L. Sherman et al., Appellants, v Claire Manufacturing Company, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Newburgh Enlarged School District, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 90
Pages: 933–933

Head Matter:
Mary L. Sherman et al., Appellants, v Claire Manufacturing Company, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Newburgh Enlarged School District, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
Submitted July 7, 1997;
decided September 23, 1997

Opinion:
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed that part of Supreme Court's order denying appellants' motion to amend their complaint, dismissed upon the ground that that part of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.