Case Name: LECO INVESTMENTS, INC., a Florida corporation, et al., Appellants, v. Charles MEYER, a single man, et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1973-03-14
Citations: 275 So. 2d 31
Docket Number: No. 71-895
Parties: LECO INVESTMENTS, INC., a Florida corporation, et al., Appellants, v. Charles MEYER, a single man, et al., Appellees.
Judges: REED, C. J., and WALDEN and MAG-ER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 275
Pages: 31–31

Head Matter:
LECO INVESTMENTS, INC., a Florida corporation, et al., Appellants, v. Charles MEYER, a single man, et al., Appellees.
No. 71-895.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
March 14, 1973.
Bruno Di Giulian, of Di Giulian & Spellacy, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.
Coleman C. Sweet, of Buckley & Bland, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee Hodges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Based upon our review of the recent case law with respect to the sufficiency of complaints and when measuring such decisions against the complaint in the instant case we are of the opinion that the allegations were such as to withstand a motion to dismiss. Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. Walters, Fla.1971, 246 So.2d 563; Iorio v. Layman, Fla.App.1971, 256 So.2d 26; Bond v. Koscot Interplanetary, Inc., Fla.App. 1971, 246 So.2d 631. See also Nantell v. Lim-Wick Construction Company, Fla.App. 1969, 228 So.2d 634.
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
REED, C. J., and WALDEN and MAG-ER, JJ., concur.