Case Name: Alphonso RODDY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-02-29
Citations: 668 So. 2d 995
Docket Number: No. 86256
Parties: Alphonso RODDY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 668
Pages: 995–995

Head Matter:
Alphonso RODDY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 86256.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Feb. 29, 1996.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Bruce A. Rosenthal, Assistant Public Defender, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami, for Petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Wanda Raiford, Assistant Attorney General, Miami, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have for review Roddy v. State, 658 So.2d 144 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), which certified the same question of great public importance answered by this Court in State v. Daniel, 665 So.2d 1040 (Fla.1995). We have jurisdiction. Art. Y, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. Based on Daniel, the decision below is approved.
It is so ordered.
GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.