Case Name: Elizabeth SCHERER, By Next Friend, Rick HEURING, Appellant, v. James SCHERER, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-09-03
Citations: 84 S.W.3d 498
Docket Number: No. ED 80497
Parties: Elizabeth SCHERER, By Next Friend, Rick HEURING, Appellant, v. James SCHERER, Respondent.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., MARY K HOFF, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 84
Pages: 498–498

Head Matter:
Elizabeth SCHERER, By Next Friend, Rick HEURING, Appellant, v. James SCHERER, Respondent.
No. ED 80497.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Sept. 3, 2002.
Jeffrey Maguire, Cape Girardeau, MO, for Appellant.
Albert C. Lowes, Cape Girardeau, MO, for Respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., MARY K HOFF, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Elizabeth Scherer (hereinafter, "Daughter"), a minor by next friend, Rick Heuring, brought a negligent parental supervision claim against James Scherer, her father (hereinafter, "Father"), for failing to supervise her while she was riding a four-wheeler. Daughter appeals the jury verdict in favor of Father. Daughter claims that one of the instructions given to the jury regarding the liability of Father was in error. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The instruction given by the trial court did not misdirect, mislead, or confuse the jury, and the instruction did not result in prejudicial error. Burns Nat'l. Lock Installation Co., Inc. v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., 61 S.W.3d 262, 270 (Mo.App. E.D.2001). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).