Case Name: BEAL BANK, SSB, Appellant, v. ALMAND & ASSOCIATES, etc., et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1998-03-27
Citations: 710 So. 2d 608
Docket Number: No. 97-944
Parties: BEAL BANK, SSB, Appellant, v. ALMAND & ASSOCIATES, etc., et al., Appellees.
Judges: COBB, J., concurs in part, dissents in part with opinion.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 710
Pages: 608–618

Head Matter:
BEAL BANK, SSB, Appellant, v. ALMAND & ASSOCIATES, etc., et al., Appellees.
No. 97-944.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
March 27, 1998.
Order Certifying Question June 5, 1998.
Alan M. Weiss and Scott D. Makar of Holland & Knight, L.L.P., Jacksonville, for Appellant.
William G. Cooper and Tracy K. Arthur of Toole, Beale & Cooper, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The issue in this case is whether bank •accounts belonging to Amos F. Almand, Jr. and his wife and bank accounts belonging to Amos Almand, III and his wife in various financial institutions deposited under various agreements with those institutions are subject to execution by creditors of only the husbands. For the reasons stated in the following opinions, we all agree that the Merrill Lynch account is subject to execution; we all agree that the salary account deposited in Compass Bank is not subject to execution; a majority holds that the accounts in the Barnett Bank and SouthTrust Bank in the names of Almand, Jr. and his wife are subject to execution; and a majority holds that the remaining accounts are not subject to execution.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.
COBB, J., concurs in part, dissents in part with opinion.
W. SHARP, J., concurs in result with opinion.
HARRIS, J., concurs in part, dissents in part with opinion.