Case Name: Harold LEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gene JOHNSON; Mr. Hammond, T.P.S.; John M. Jabe; Stanley Young, Warden, Pocahontas State Correctional Center, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-06-01
Citations: 433 F. App'x 154
Docket Number: No. 11-6118
Parties: Harold LEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gene JOHNSON; Mr. Hammond, T.P.S.; John M. Jabe; Stanley Young, Warden, Pocahontas State Correctional Center, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before KING, SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 433
Pages: 154–155

Head Matter:
Harold LEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gene JOHNSON; Mr. Hammond, T.P.S.; John M. Jabe; Stanley Young, Warden, Pocahontas State Correctional Center, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 11-6118.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 26, 2011.
Decided: June 1, 2011.
Harold Lee, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before KING, SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Harold Lee appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a preliminary injunction. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Lee's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, Lee has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.