Case Name: In the Matter of Freddy G., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2009-12-15
Citations: 68 A.D.3d 542
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Freddy G., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 68
Pages: 542–542

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Freddy G., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.
[889 NYS2d 457]

Opinion:
The court's fact-finding determination was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court's determinations concerning credibility and identification. The victim's testimony established that he had a sufficient opportunity to observe appellant at the time of the robbery, and that he was able to recognize him when he encountered him several weeks later. Concur — Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Freedman and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.