Case Name: Krystal Tonkin et al., Respondents, v. Widewaters Lakewood Village Center Company et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2010-03-19
Citations: 71 A.D.3d 1498
Docket Number: 
Parties: Krystal Tonkin et al., Respondents, v Widewaters Lakewood Village Center Company et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 71
Pages: 1498–1498

Head Matter:
Krystal Tonkin et al., Respondents, v Widewaters Lakewood Village Center Company et al., Appellants.
[895 NYS2d 908]

Opinion:
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Chautauqua County (James H. Dillon, J.), entered July 1, 2009 in a personal injury action. The order denied the motion of defendants for summary judgment.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed with costs.
Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this action seeking damages for injuries sustained by Krystal Tonkin (plaintiff) when she slipped and fell on snow-covered ice in a parking lot owned by defendants. Supreme Court properly denied defendants' motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint. Defendants' own submissions raise a triable issue of fact whether plaintiff fell "as the result of an icy condition occurring during an ongoing storm or for a reasonable time thereafter" (Solazzo v New York City Tr. Auth., 6 NY3d 734, 735 [2005]), or whether she fell as the result of ice that had accumulated prior to the storm (see Stalker v Crestview Cadillac Corp., 284 AD2d 977 [2001]). In addition, defendants failed to meet their initial burden of establishing that they lacked constructive notice of the icy condition (see Walter v United Parcel Serv., Inc., 56 AD3d 1187 [2008]; Simmons v Oswego County Sav. Bank, 306 AD2d 825 [2003]). Present—Centra, J.P., Fahey, Carni, Green and Pine, JJ.