Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Melissa PRINE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-02-21
Citations: 167 F. App'x 962
Docket Number: No. 05-4478
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Melissa PRINE, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 167
Pages: 962–963

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Melissa PRINE, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 05-4478.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 16, 2006.
Decided: Feb. 21, 2006.
Todd A. Twyman, Twyman Law Offices, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. Charles T. Miller, Acting United States Attorney, W. Chad Noel, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Melissa Prine appeals her thirty-seven month prison sentence resulting from her conviction for delivery of cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (2000). Finding no error, we affirm.
Prine claims that the district court erred by not crediting her sentence for seven months of home confinement prior to her sentence. Contrary to Prine's claim, time spent on home confinement with electronic monitoring does not constitute time served in "official detention" under 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b) (2000). Randall v. Whelan, 938 F.2d 522, 524 (4th Cir.1991); United States v. Insley, 927 F.2d 185, 186 (4th Cir.1991). Therefore, the district court properly declined to credit Prine's sentence.
Accordingly, we affirm Prine's sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Prine does not appeal her conviction.