Case Name: Alan Andrew ABT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-07-03
Citations: 581 So. 2d 1001
Docket Number: No. 90-3068
Parties: Alan Andrew ABT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: LETTS, GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 581
Pages: 1001–1001

Head Matter:
Alan Andrew ABT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 90-3068.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
July 3, 1991.
Certification and Rehearing July 31, 1991.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Tanja Ostapoff, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and John Tiedemann, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm appellant's convictions and sentence except for that part of the sentence that imposes restitution. We hold that the imposition of restitution for the first time on remand constituted a prohibited enhanced sentence. See North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 89 S.Ct. 2072, 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969); see also Morganti v. State, 573 So.2d 820 (Fla.1991). We reverse the imposition of restitution and remand with instructions for the trial court vacate that part of the sentence. In all other respects the judgment is affirmed.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; REMANDED.
LETTS, GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.