Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Appellant, v. ROBERT HUNTER BARTON, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1985-07-10
Citations: 74 Or. App. 350
Docket Number: 84-614; 84-615; 84-616; 84-617; 84-618; CA A34543
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Appellant, v. ROBERT HUNTER BARTON, Respondent.
Judges: Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Van Hoomissen and Young, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 74
Pages: 350–351

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted June 10,
reversed and remanded for trial July 10,
reconsideration denied August 23,
petition for review denied October 15, 1985 (330 Or 162)
STATE OF OREGON, Appellant, v. ROBERT HUNTER BARTON, Respondent.
(84-614; 84-615; 84-616; 84-617; 84-618; CA A34543)
701 P2d 1056
Thomas H. Denney, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and James E. Mountain, Jr., Solicitor General, Salem.
Ronald E. Cinniger, Metropolitan Public Defender, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.
Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Van Hoomissen and Young, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
The trial court's dismissal of the charging instruments in each of these cases was inappropriate. Reversed and remanded for trial.