Case Name: Ras Selassie BRYSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OCWEN FEDERAL BANK, FSB, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-02-28
Citations: 413 F. App'x 624
Docket Number: No. 10-1773
Parties: Ras Selassie BRYSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OCWEN FEDERAL BANK, FSB, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 413
Pages: 624–624

Head Matter:
Ras Selassie BRYSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OCWEN FEDERAL BANK, FSB, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 10-1773.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 24, 2011.
Decided: Feb. 28, 2011.
Ras Selassie Bryson, Appellant Pro Se. Jason Kenneth Purser, Shapiro & Ingle LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ras Selassie Bryson seeks to appeal the district court's order accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation, and dismissing her civil action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.
Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court's final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). "[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement." Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007).
The district court's order was entered on the docket on June 4, 2010. The notice of appeal was filed on July 7, 2010. Because Bryson failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.