Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James QUEEN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-02-11
Citations: 29 F. App'x 139
Docket Number: No. 01-7756
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James QUEEN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 29
Pages: 139–140

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James QUEEN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 01-7756.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 31, 2002.
Decided Feb. 11, 2002.
James Queen, Pro Se. Jamie M. Bennett, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
James Queen appeals the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabihty and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Queen, Nos. CR-98-35-WMN; CA-99-2473-WMN (D.Md. Aug. 13, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.