Case Name: EMIL WITTMAN et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES (a Public Corporation) et al., Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1930-12-31
Citations: 211 Cal. 778
Docket Number: L. A. No. 10655
Parties: EMIL WITTMAN et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES (a Public Corporation) et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Reports
Volume: 211
Pages: 778–779

Head Matter:
[L. A. No. 10655.
In Bank.
December 31, 1930.]
EMIL WITTMAN et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES (a Public Corporation) et al., Respondents.
Woodruff, Musick & Hartke, Walter W. Rennie and Harmel L. Pratt for Appellants.
Erwin P. Werner, City Attorney, and Frederick von Schrader, Deputy City Attorney, for Respondents.

Opinion:
THE COURT.
The facts and problems involved in this case are set forth in the opinion in the case of Jones v. City of Los Angeles (L. A. No. 10654), ante, p. 304 [295 Pac. 14], this day filed. On the authority of that case the judgment is reversed.
Rehearing denied.
Seawell, J., Shenk, J., and Curtis, J., dissented.