Case Name: Darryl DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1996-12-10
Citations: 936 S.W.2d 175
Docket Number: No. 69906
Parties: Darryl DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 936
Pages: 175–175

Head Matter:
Darryl DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 69906.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Dec. 10, 1996.
Deborah B. Wafer, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Cheryl A Caponegro, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Darryl Davis appeals from the trial court's denial of his Rule 24.035 motion. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find both claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).