Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos Salazar LOPEZ, aka Carlos Salazar, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-03-03
Citations: 315 F. App'x 660
Docket Number: No. 08-30129
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos Salazar LOPEZ, aka Carlos Salazar, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before BEEZER, FERNANDEZ, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 315
Pages: 660–661

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos Salazar LOPEZ, aka Carlos Salazar, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-30129.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 18, 2009.
Filed March 3, 2009.
Paulette Lynn Stewart, Assistant U.S., USHE-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Helena, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Michael Donahoe, Esquire, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Helena, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before BEEZER, FERNANDEZ, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Carlos Salazar Lopez appeals from the 270-month sentence imposed upon resen-tencing. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Salazar Lopez contends that the sentence imposed is unreasonable because the district court did not consider, weigh, and give effect to his substantial post-sentencing rehabilitation in fashioning the sentence. We conclude that the district court did not procedurally err, and that the sentence is reasonable. See Gall v. United States, — U.S. -,-, 128 S.Ct. 586, 596-97, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); see also United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992-93 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.