Case Name: A.L. Reinschmidt, D. J. Reinschmidt and J. L. Reinschmidt, Copartners, Doing Business Under the Firm Name of Pensacola Cooperage Company, Appellants, v. The Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, a Corporation, and L. G. Crosby, Appellees
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1925-10-16
Citations: 90 Fla. 334
Docket Number: 
Parties: A.L. Reinschmidt, D. J. Reinschmidt and J. L. Reinschmidt, Copartners, Doing Business Under the Firm Name of Pensacola Cooperage Company, Appellants, v. The Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, a Corporation, and L. G. Crosby, Appellees.
Judges: Ellis and Terrell, J. J., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 90
Pages: 334–335

Head Matter:
A.L. Reinschmidt, D. J. Reinschmidt and J. L. Reinschmidt, Copartners, Doing Business Under the Firm Name of Pensacola Cooperage Company, Appellants, v. The Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, a Corporation, and L. G. Crosby, Appellees.
Division A.
Opinion Filed October 16, 1925.
Where under the allegations of a bill of- complaint an equity for substantial relief may be shown by appropriate and sufficient evidence, it is error to sustain a general demurrer to the bill.
An Appeal from the Court of Record for Escambia County; C. Moreno Jones, Judge.
Reversed.
John S. Beard and John P. Stokes, for Appellants;
P. D. Beall, B. C. Maxwell and Carter & Yonge, for Appellees.

Opinion:
West, C. J.
To an amended bill of complaint seeking to enjoin defendants from -interrupting, or interfering with the use by complainants of certain railroad tracks from the main line of the defendant railroad company to the' factory of complainants or of obstructing such track, a demurrer was sustained and the bill dismissed.
This appeal is from that order.
Because of the somewhat complicated state of facts shown by the bill we shall not at this stage of the proceedings discuss the principles of law involved.
It is sufficient to say that under the allegations of the bill an equity for substantial relief may be shown by appropriate and sufficient evidence; therefore the demurrer to the bill of complaint should have been overruled. Florida East Coast R. Co. v. City of Miami, 80 Fla. 329, 86 So. 208; Wells v. Williams, 80 Fla. 498, 86 So. 336.
The order appealed from is reversed.
Reversed.
Ellis and Terrell, J. J., concur.
Whitfield, P. J., and Strum, J., concur, in the opinion,
Brown, J., not participating.