Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Herman Robinson WINGO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-08-27
Citations: 475 F. App'x 883
Docket Number: No. 12-6591
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Herman Robinson WINGO, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 475
Pages: 883–883

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Herman Robinson WINGO, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 12-6591.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 22, 2012.
Decided: Aug. 27, 2012.
Herman Robinson Wingo, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, Carrie Fisher Sherard, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Herman Robinson Wingo appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a reduction of sentence based on Amendment 750 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual. We have reviewed the record and conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See United States v. Stewart, 595 F.3d 197, 200 (4th Cir.2010). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Wingo, No. 4:09-cr-00854-RBH-5 (D.S.C. Feb. 24, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.