Case Name: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. PEARL ALFREDA WEST
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 1986-01-07
Citations: 315 N.C. 387
Docket Number: No. 545PA85
Parties: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. PEARL ALFREDA WEST
Judges: 
Reporter: North Carolina Reports
Volume: 315
Pages: 387–387

Head Matter:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. PEARL ALFREDA WEST
No. 545PA85
(Filed 7 January 1986)
We granted the State’s petition for discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 on 26 September 1985 to review the decision of the Court of Appeals (Arnold, J., Hedrick, Chief Judge, and Cozort, J., concurring) reported at 76 N.C. App. 459, 333 S.E. 2d 522 (1985). The Court of Appeals held that defendant’s motion to dismiss “for insufficiency of the evidence should have been granted.” In so holding the Court of Appeals reversed the judgment of Pope, J., sentencing defendant to imprisonment for twenty-five years upon the jury verdict of guilty of second degree murder entered at the 9 April 1984 Session of Duplin County Superior Court.
Lacy H. Thornburg, Attorney General, by Luden Capone, III, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.
Malcolm Ray Hunter, Jr., Acting Appellate Defender, for defendant-appe lie e.
Jane M. Edmisten, William A. Friedlander and Crombie J. D. Garrett, Attorneys, Amici Curiae.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Having carefully considered the opinion of the Court of Appeals, the records, briefs and oral arguments in the case before us, we conclude that our order of 26 September 1985 allowing the State's petition for discretionary review was improvidently allowed.
Discretionary review improvidently allowed.