Case Name: Lester HARDY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Boyd BENNETT; Dennis Rowland, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-03-17
Citations: 317 F. App'x 362
Docket Number: No. 08-8432
Parties: Lester HARDY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Boyd BENNETT; Dennis Rowland, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 317
Pages: 362–363

Head Matter:
Lester HARDY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Boyd BENNETT; Dennis Rowland, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 08-8432.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 12, 2009.
Decided: March 17, 2009.
Lester Hardy, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Lester Hardy appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,- we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hardy v. Bennett, No. 5:08-ct-03044-H (E.D.N.C. Nov. 10, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.