Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sheila Clark LEWIS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-02-20
Citations: 712 F. App'x 276
Docket Number: No. 17-7478
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sheila Clark LEWIS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 712
Pages: 276–277

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sheila Clark LEWIS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 17-7478
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: February 15, 2018
Decided: February 20, 2018
Sheila Clark Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. Randy Carl Stoker, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Sheila Clark Lewis appeals the district court's order denying her motion to reduce restitution payments. On appeal, we con-fíne our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Lewis' informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, Lewis has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED