Case Name: Jose Francisco NUNES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. John ASHCROFT, United States Attorney General, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-07-08
Citations: 375 F.3d 810
Docket Number: No. 02-55613
Parties: Jose Francisco NUNES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. John ASHCROFT, United States Attorney General, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before: RYMER and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges, and LEIGHTON, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 375
Pages: 810–818

Head Matter:
Jose Francisco NUNES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. John ASHCROFT, United States Attorney General, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 02-55613.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
July 8, 2004.
Sylvia Baiz, San Diego, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.
Donald E. Keener, Michelle E. Gorden, Attorney, Washington, DC, for Respondent-Appellee.
Before: RYMER and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges, and LEIGHTON, District Judge.
Order: Dissent by Judge TASHIMA; Dissent by Judge REINHARDT
Honorable Ronald B. Leighton, United States District Judge for the Western District of Washington, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
ORDER AND DISSENTS DENYING REHEARING EN BANC
ORDER
The opinion filed November 3, 2003, and appearing at 348 F.3d 815 (9th Cir.2003), is amended by the opinion filed simultaneously with this order.
With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Judges Rymer and Tallman have voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge Leighton so recommends.
The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. An active judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonre-cused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
The petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED.