Case Name: Charles T. CHARNOCK, Appellant, v. HOWARD ALLEN'S PAINT & BODY SHOP INC., and P.B.-L.W. Leasing Company, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-09-18
Citations: 585 So. 2d 1158
Docket Number: No. 90-1936
Parties: Charles T. CHARNOCK, Appellant, v. HOWARD ALLEN’S PAINT & BODY SHOP INC., and P.B.-L.W. Leasing Company, Appellees.
Judges: GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and STREITFELD, JEFFREY E., Associate Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 585
Pages: 1158–1158

Head Matter:
Charles T. CHARNOCK, Appellant, v. HOWARD ALLEN’S PAINT & BODY SHOP INC., and P.B.-L.W. Leasing Company, Appellees.
No. 90-1936.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Sept. 18, 1991.
Gary S. Israel, Palm Beach, for appellant.
Maxine A. Braten, Powers & Koons, West Palm Beach, for appellee Howard Allen’s Paint & Body Shop Inc.
George P. Ord, Alley, Maass, Rogers & Lindsay, P.A., Palm Beach, for appellee P.B.-L.W. Leasing Co.

Opinion:
FARMER, Judge.
We affirm the trial court's decision in all respects, except one. The written estimates said nothing about storage charges. Nor is there any evidence that the repair shop ever orally notified appellant that it would claim per diem (or, for that matter, any other kind) storage charges. Appellant's first notice of any claim to such charges was in the claim of lien and notice of sale. Accordingly, we reverse that part of the decision which enforces the repair shop's lien as to the storage charges in the amount of $800. We leave undisturbed all remaining aspects of the final judgment.
AFFIRMED IN PART, AND REVERSED IN PART.
GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and STREITFELD, JEFFREY E., Associate Judge, concur.