Case Name: Francis AKINRO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BALTIMORE U.S. POST OFFICE POLICEMEN, et al., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-07-30
Citations: 389 F. App'x 328
Docket Number: No. 10-1580
Parties: Francis AKINRO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BALTIMORE U.S. POST OFFICE POLICEMEN, et al., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 389
Pages: 328–328

Head Matter:
Francis AKINRO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BALTIMORE U.S. POST OFFICE POLICEMEN, et al., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 10-1580.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 22, 2010.
Decided: July 30, 2010.
Francis Akinro, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Francis Akinro appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Akinro v. Baltimore U.S. Post Office Policemen, No. 1:10-cv-01151-JFM (D.Md. May 14, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.