Case Name: Floyd JOHNSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-03-21
Citations: 16 S.W.3d 710
Docket Number: No. ED 76587
Parties: Floyd JOHNSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., and ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 16
Pages: 710–711

Head Matter:
Floyd JOHNSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 76587.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
March 21, 2000.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 10, 2000.
Elaine A. Pudlowski, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Barbara K Chesser, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., and ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Floyd Johnson appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court's judgment is based on findings of fact and conclusions of law that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a memorandum of law, for them information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).