Case Name: PARRIS v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1917-05-02
Citations: 194 S.W. 1111
Docket Number: No. 4457
Parties: PARRIS v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 194
Pages: 1111–1111

Head Matter:
PARRIS v. STATE.
(No. 4457.)
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
May 2, 1917.)
Criminal Law <S=>1090(7) — Appeal—Bill or Exceptions.
Where bill of exceptions was not reserved to the trial court’s refusal to grant motion for continuance, the ruling cannot be considered on appeal.
[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see- Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. § 3204.]
'Appeal froni- Harris County Court, at Law; Murray B. Jones, Judge.
J. P. Parris was convicted of swindling, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
E. B. Hendricks, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Opinion:
DAVIDSON, P. J.
Appellant was convicted of swindling, and his punishment assessed at 30 days in jail in addition to a fine of $25.
The record is before us without a statement of facts or bill of exceptions. There is nothing in the motion for a new trial that can be considered in the absence of evidence. There is a motion for a continuance in the' record, but a bill of exceptions was not reserved to the court's refusal to grant it. Therefore it cannot be considered.
The judgment is affirmed.