Case Name: The State of Florida on the relation of Fred H. Davis, Attorney General, Avon Florida Citrus Corporation, a Florida Corporation, Pine Crest Lakes Country Club, a Florida Corporation, Pine Crest Lakes Company, a Florida Corporation, Avon Manufacturing Company, a Florida Corporation, John Henry Smith, Norton T. Smith, Henry L. Meade, et als., Co-relators, vs. City of Avon Park, a municipal corporation of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1932-03-02
Citations: 104 Fla. 389
Docket Number: 
Parties: The State of Florida on the relation of Fred H. Davis, Attorney General, Avon Florida Citrus Corporation, a Florida Corporation, Pine Crest Lakes Country Club, a Florida Corporation, Pine Crest Lakes Company, a Florida Corporation, Avon Manufacturing Company, a Florida Corporation, John Henry Smith, Norton T. Smith, Henry L. Meade, et als., Co-relators, vs. City of Avon Park, a municipal corporation of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 104
Pages: 389–389

Head Matter:
The State of Florida on the relation of Fred H. Davis, Attorney General, Avon Florida Citrus Corporation, a Florida Corporation, Pine Crest Lakes Country Club, a Florida Corporation, Pine Crest Lakes Company, a Florida Corporation, Avon Manufacturing Company, a Florida Corporation, John Henry Smith, Norton T. Smith, Henry L. Meade, et als., Co-relators, vs. City of Avon Park, a municipal corporation of Florida, Respondent.
139 So. 899.
En Banc.
Order entered March 2, 1932.
Fred H. Davis, Attorney General, Henderson & Franklin, Walker <& Willson, and Mabry, Reaves & White, for Relators;
8. Colquitt Pardee, for Respondent.
Giles & Gurney, as amici curiae.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
—This cause having heretofore been submitted upon the demurrer of the respondent to the information filed in said cause and the co-relators' motion to strike certain portions of the respondent's answer and the demurrer of co-relators to certain portions of the respondent's answer and co-relators' demurrer to respondent's answer as a whole;
It is considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said demurrer of the respondent to the information filed in this cause be and the same is hereby overruled; and the said motion to strike and said demurrers filed by eo-relators to portions of the answer, and to the answers as a whole, be and they are hereby set down for oral argument before this court on the... .day of....... A. D. 1932.
Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell and Brown, J.J., concur.