Case Name: Nathan FISHER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GREENVILLE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE; E.E. Ware, Officer #515; T.D. Hampton, Officer; K.D. Durham, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-05-15
Citations: 34 F. App'x 144
Docket Number: No. 02-6073
Parties: Nathan FISHER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GREENVILLE COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE; E.E. Ware, Officer #515; T.D. Hampton, Officer; K.D. Durham, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 34
Pages: 144–145

Head Matter:
Nathan FISHER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GREENVILLE COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE; E.E. Ware, Officer #515; T.D. Hampton, Officer; K.D. Durham, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 02-6073.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 30, 2002.
Decided May 15, 2002.
Nathan Fisher, Pro Se. Russell W. Harter, Jr., Chapman, Harter & Groves, P.A., Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Nathan Fisher appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) com plaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Fisher v. Greenville County Sheriff's Office, No. CA-99-3473-2-08 (D.S.C. Dec. 17, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.