Case Name: Richard R. Lee, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Robert O. LAMPERT, Respondent-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-02-08
Citations: 633 F.3d 1176
Docket Number: No. 09-35276
Parties: Richard R. Lee, Petitioner-Appellee, v.Robert O. LAMPERT, Respondent-Appellant.
Judges: Judge Murguia did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 633
Pages: 1176–1177

Head Matter:
Richard R. Lee, Petitioner-Appellee, v.Robert O. LAMPERT, Respondent-Appellant.
No. 09-35276.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Feb. 8, 2011.
Stephen R. Sady, FPDOR — Federal Public Defender’s Office, Portland, OR, for Petitioner-Appellee.
Erin C. Lagesen, Assistant Attorney General, Carolyn Alexander, Esquire, As sistant Attorney General, Oregon Department of Justice, Janet A. Klapstein, Assistant Attorney General, AGOR — Office of the Oregon Attorney General, Salem, OR, for Respondent-Appellant.

Opinion:
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Judge Murguia did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.