Case Name: J. Fernando BANDERAS and Monica L. Banderas, Appellants, v. BANCO CENTRAL del ECUADOR, an agency of the Government of Ecuador, and David Rabinowitz, Receiver, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1985-02-12
Citations: 463 So. 2d 523
Docket Number: Nos. 84-600, 84-677
Parties: J. Fernando BANDERAS and Monica L. Banderas, Appellants, v. BANCO CENTRAL del ECUADOR, an agency of the Government of Ecuador, and David Rabinowitz, Receiver, Appel-lees.
Judges: Before HENDRY, BASKIN and JOR-GENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 463
Pages: 523–524

Head Matter:
J. Fernando BANDERAS and Monica L. Banderas, Appellants, v. BANCO CENTRAL del ECUADOR, an agency of the Government of Ecuador, and David Rabinowitz, Receiver, Appel-lees.
Nos. 84-600, 84-677.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 12, 1985.
Andrew C. Pavliek, Miami, Lawrence Felder, Boca Raton, for appellants.
McDermott, Will & Emery and Charles A. Intriago and Susan Guller, Miami, for appellees.
Before HENDRY, BASKIN and JOR-GENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the contempt orders entered by the trial court. We hold that appellants received adequate notice of the provisions contained in the Final Judgment prohibiting the transfer, sale, or disposal of any assets; that there was no fatal defect in the institution of process, rule 3.840, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, [see Aiello v. State, 338 So.2d 1101 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976) ]; and that substantial competent evidence supports the judgments of conviction for indirect criminal contempt and for indirect civil contempt. In addition, we affirm the conviction for direct criminal contempt based upon J. Fernando Banderas's failure to appear at a hearing.
Affirmed.