Case Name: Joe L. WITHERSPOON, Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF Marie B. ROBINSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JEFFORDS AGENCY, INCORPORATED; Allstate Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-02-18
Citations: 120 F. App'x 999
Docket Number: No. 03-1467
Parties: Joe L. WITHERSPOON, Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF Marie B. ROBINSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. JEFFORDS AGENCY, INCORPORATED; Allstate Insurance Company, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 120
Pages: 999–1000

Head Matter:
Joe L. WITHERSPOON, Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF Marie B. ROBINSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. JEFFORDS AGENCY, INCORPORATED; Allstate Insurance Company, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 03-1467.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 5, 2005.
Decided Feb. 18, 2005.
Joe L. Witherspoon, Appellant pro se. Jon René Josey, Turner, Padgett, Graham & Laney, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Joe L. Witherspoon, as personal representative of the Estate of Marie B. Robinson, appeals the district court's order dismissing Witherspoon's civil action without prejudice for failure to comply with the magistrate judge's order to retain counsel. We have reviewed the record as supplemented and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Witherspoon v. Jeffords Agency, Inc., No. CA-02-1831-412BH (D.S.C. Mar. 31, 2003); see also Shepherd v. Wellman, 313 F.3d 963, 970-71 (6th Cir.2002); Pridgen v. Andresen, 113 F.3d 391, 393 (2d Cir.1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.