Case Name: Elva Mangold, Appellant, v. Helen Neuman, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1982-07-01
Citations: 57 N.Y.2d 627
Docket Number: 
Parties: Elva Mangold, Appellant, v Helen Neuman, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 57
Pages: 627–629

Head Matter:
Elva Mangold, Appellant, v Helen Neuman, Respondent.
Decided July 1, 1982
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Saul I Weinstein for appellant.
Pamela Jarvis for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed, with costs. The courts below concluded that defendant's dwelling place, where she stayed occasionally in connection with her business activities, was not a residence for purposes of CPLR 308 (subd 2). This affirmed factual determination is beyond the scope of our review, there being evidence in the record to support it.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.