Case Name: Nathan LAMPLEY, Petitioner, v. McMURRAY PLASTERING COMPANY et al., Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1964-09-09
Citations: 170 So. 2d 843
Docket Number: No. 33462
Parties: Nathan LAMPLEY, Petitioner, v. McMURRAY PLASTERING COMPANY et al., Respondents.
Judges: DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 170
Pages: 843–844

Head Matter:
Nathan LAMPLEY, Petitioner, v. McMURRAY PLASTERING COMPANY et al., Respondents.
No. 33462.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Sept. 9, 1964.
Rehearing Denied Oct. 14, 1964.
Richard A. Sicking and Kaplan, Ser, Abrams & O’Malley, Miami, for petitioner.
Knight, Smith, Underwood & Peters Miami, for McMurray Plastering Co. and Maryland Cas. Co.
Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for Florida Industrial Commission, respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date March 18, 1964.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dis pensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.