Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Guadalupe DIAZ-RAMOS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-12-29
Citations: 305 F. App'x 438
Docket Number: No. 08-30051
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jose Guadalupe DIAZ-RAMOS, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 305
Pages: 438–439

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jose Guadalupe DIAZ-RAMOS, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 08-30051.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 17, 2008.
Filed Dec. 29, 2008.
James P. Hagarty, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Yakima, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Nicholas W. Marchi, Carney & Marchi, PS, Seattle, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: GOODWIN, TROTT, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Jose Guadalupe Diaz-Ramos appeals from the district court's denial of his motion to dismiss the indictment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Diaz-Ramos was indicted for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He contends that the district court erred when it denied his motion to dismiss because he was previously deported under an incorrect alien number which invalidated his prior deportation. Because Diaz-Ramos did not suffer prejudice as a result of being deported under an incorrect number, his contention fails. See United States v. Muro-Inclan, 249 F.3d 1180, 1185 (9th Cir.2001).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.