Case Name: Mark HENNIS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1994-03-10
Citations: 635 So. 2d 11
Docket Number: No. 82068
Parties: Mark HENNIS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 635
Pages: 11–11

Head Matter:
Mark HENNIS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 82068.
Supreme Court of Florida.
March 10, 1994.
Rehearing Denied May 2, 1994.
Alan H. Schreiber, Public Defender, and Stacey J. Pastel, Asst. Public Defender, Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Joan Fowler, Sr. Asst. Atty. Gen., Chief, Crim. Law, and James J. Carney, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have for review State v. Hennis, 619 So.2d 309 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993), which certified the same questions we have answered in Carino v. State, 635 So.2d 9 (Fla.1994). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. Based on Carino, the decision below is approved.
It is so ordered.
BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.