Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Betty J. STOWELL, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-09-27
Citations: 172 S.W.3d 501
Docket Number: No. WD 64058
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Betty J. STOWELL, Appellant.
Judges: Before HARDWICK, P.J., BRECKENRIDGE and SPINDEN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 172
Pages: 501–502

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Betty J. STOWELL, Appellant.
No. WD 64058.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Sept. 27, 2005.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Amy M. Bartholow, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Before HARDWICK, P.J., BRECKENRIDGE and SPINDEN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Betty Stowell appeals from her conviction on two counts of possessing a controlled substance in violation of Section 195.202, RSMo.2000. She contends the trial court abused its discretion in disallowing certain inquiries during voir dire.
Upon review of the record, we find no abuse of discretion and affirm the convictions. We have provided the parties with a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value.
AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).