Case Name: DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Petitioner, v. Ivia Jean NEWSOME, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1984-11-08
Citations: 459 So. 2d 314
Docket Number: No. 64268
Parties: DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Petitioner, v. Ivia Jean NEWSOME, Respondent.
Judges: OVERTON, ALDERMAN, McDONALD, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 459
Pages: 314–314

Head Matter:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Petitioner, v. Ivia Jean NEWSOME, Respondent.
No. 64268.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Nov. 8, 1984.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Pamela Lut-ton-Shields and Louis F. Hubener, Asst. Attys. Gen., Tallahassee, for petitioner.
Joel D. Eaton of Podhurst, Orseck, Parks, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow & Olin, Miami, and Wagner, Cunningham, Vaughan & McLaughlin, Tampa, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We originally accepted jurisdiction in this cause, reported below as Newsome v. Department of Corrections, 435 So.2d 887 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983), on the basis of conflict with Mastrandrea v. J. Mann, Inc., 128 So.2d 146 (Fla.3d DCA), cert. denied, 133 So.2d 320 (Fla.1961). After hearing oral argument, however, we find that there is no express and direct conflict and, consequently, there is no basis for this Court to accept jurisdiction in this cause. The petition for review is denied.
It is so ordered.
OVERTON, ALDERMAN, McDONALD, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur.
BOYD, C.J., and ADKINS, J., dissent.
NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ENTERTAINED BY THE COURT. SEE FLA.R.APP.P. 9.330(d).