Case Name: Farland GILLIEHAN, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-07-27
Citations: 998 S.W.2d 821
Docket Number: No. 75494
Parties: Farland GILLIEHAN, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANDALL, P.J. and KAROHL, J. and HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 998
Pages: 821–821

Head Matter:
Farland GILLIEHAN, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 75494.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
July 27, 1999.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Sept. 1, 1999.
Jason S. Marks, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Kristin M. Frazier, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before CRANDALL, P.J. and KAROHL, J. and HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Farland Gilliehan (Movant) appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. Movant sought this relief following his guilty pleas to three counts- of second degree burglary and three counts of stealing $160 or more, in violation of sections 569.170 and 570.030, RSMo 1994, respectively. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).