Case Name: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Immelt
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1990-11-07
Citations: 55 Ohio St. 3d 17
Docket Number: No. 90-803
Parties: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Immelt.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 55
Pages: 17–18

Head Matter:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Immelt.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Immelt (1990), 55 Ohio St. 3d 17.]
(No. 90-803
Submitted June 19, 1990
Decided November 7, 1990.)
J. Warren Bettis, disciplinary counsel, and Mark H. Aultman, for relator.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Having thoroughly reviewed the record in this case, we concur in the board's findings that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(3), (4), and (5), and 9-102(B)(4). We also agree with the board's recommendation. Therefore, we order that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Respondent is further ordered to show complete restitution and adequate recovery upon any application he makes for readmission to the Ohio Bar. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.
Resnick, J., dissents.