Case Name: ABEL, TONY AND ALDO CREATIVE GROUP, INC., Appellant, v. FRIDAY NIGHT INVESTORS, INC., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1982-09-21
Citations: 419 So. 2d 1135
Docket Number: No. 82-763
Parties: ABEL, TONY AND ALDO CREATIVE GROUP, INC., Appellant, v. FRIDAY NIGHT INVESTORS, INC., Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, BASKIN and JOR-GENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 419
Pages: 1135–1136

Head Matter:
ABEL, TONY AND ALDO CREATIVE GROUP, INC., Appellant, v. FRIDAY NIGHT INVESTORS, INC., Appellee.
No. 82-763.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Sept. 21, 1982.
Rehearing Denied O.ct. 20, 1982.
Leonardo P. Mendez, Miami, for appellant.
Sams, Gerstein & Ward and Paul M. Rashkind, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, BASKIN and JOR-GENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
SCHWARTZ, Judge.
The order vacating the final default judgment is reversed for reinstatement of the judgment because neither of the two indispensable prerequisites for granting that relief was demonstrated below. The affidavit of the defendant's president that he had referred the complaint to an attorney whom he "thought" had responded was insufficient to demonstrate excusable neglect, particularly since the plaintiff subsequently gave notice, which was not responded to, of its intention to seek a default because no answer had been filed. Westinghouse Credit Corp. v. Steven Lake Masonry, Inc., 356 So.2d 1329 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Sun Finance Corp. v. Friend, 139 So.2d 484 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962). Moreover, the bare statement that the defendant had an unspecified "complete defense to the Complaint," accompanied by a motion to dismiss claiming only technical deficiencies, was manifestly insufficient to show the existence of a meritorious defense. Pedro Realty, Inc. v. Silva, 399 So.2d 367 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).