Case Name: Earl Jason LARISCEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1992-12-28
Citations: 981 F.2d 1244
Docket Number: No. 90-5129
Parties: Earl Jason LARISCEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before NIES, Chief Judge, RICH, NEWMAN, ARCHER, MAYER, MICHEL, PLAGER, LOURIE, CLEVENGER, and RADER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 981
Pages: 1244–1244

Head Matter:
Earl Jason LARISCEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 90-5129.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Dec. 28, 1992.
Rehearing Denied March 3, 1993.
John S. Moot, Washington, DC, argued, for plaintiff-appellant, on the brief on Rehearing In Banc. Also on the brief, for plaintiff-appellant were Buel White and Lewis B. Gardner.
Edward H. Rice, Dept, of Justice, argued, for defendant-appellee, on the brief on Rehearing In Banc, with him on the brief, were Stuart M. Gerson, and Vito J. DiPietro. Also on the brief, for defendant-appellee was Chun-I Chiang. Of counsel, was John Fargo.
Before NIES, Chief Judge, RICH, NEWMAN, ARCHER, MAYER, MICHEL, PLAGER, LOURIE, CLEVENGER, and RADER, Circuit Judges.
Circuit Judge Schall took no part in the decision of this case.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The judgment in the above appeal is affirmed by an equally divided court.