Case Name: BANCO DE COMERCIO, S.A.C.A., Sociedad Financiera De Comercio, C.A., and Inversiones Credival C.A., Petitioners, v. SUN BANKS, INC., et al., Respondents
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1986-05-13
Citations: 488 So. 2d 870
Docket Number: No. 86-505
Parties: BANCO DE COMERCIO, S.A.C.A., Sociedad Financiera De Comercio, C.A., and Inversiones Credival C.A., Petitioners, v. SUN BANKS, INC., et al., Respondents.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 488
Pages: 870–870

Head Matter:
BANCO DE COMERCIO, S.A.C.A., Sociedad Financiera De Comercio, C.A., and Inversiones Credival C.A., Petitioners, v. SUN BANKS, INC., et al., Respondents.
No. 86-505.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 13, 1986.
Rehearing Denied June 13, 1986.
Hornsby & Whisenand and Alberto J. Mora, Steven Kamp and Jon Weber, Miami, for petitioners.
Bedell, Dittmar, DeVault, Pillans & Gentry and C. Harris Dittmar, Jacksonville, Conrad, Scherer & James and Valerie Shea, Ft. Lauderdale, for respondents.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The order disqualifying petitioners' counsel is a clear departure from the essential requirements of the law as enunciated in, inter alia, Williams v. Wood, 475 So.2d 289 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); Cazares v. Church of Scientology of California, Inc., 429 So.2d 348 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983), pet. for review denied, 438 So.2d 831 (Fla.1983); and Perez v. State, 474 So.2d 398 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), and is therefore quashed on the authority of those decisions.
Certiorari granted.