Case Name: CORRUGATING MACHINERY CORPORATION and S. & S. Corrugating Paper Machinery Co., Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. EMPIRE CORRUGATED CONTAINER CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee; CORRUGATING MACHINERY CORPORATION and S. & S. Corrugating Paper Machinery Co., Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PROGRESSIVE CORRUGATED PAPER MACHINERY CO., Inc., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1931-01-05
Citations: 47 F.2d 276
Docket Number: Nos. 129, 130
Parties: CORRUGATING MACHINERY CORPORATION and S. & S. Corrugating Paper Machinery Co., Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. EMPIRE CORRUGATED CONTAINER CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. CORRUGATING MACHINERY CORPORATION and S. & S. Corrugating Paper Machinery Co., Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PROGRESSIVE CORRUGATED PAPER MACHINERY CO., Inc., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 47
Pages: 276–276

Head Matter:
CORRUGATING MACHINERY CORPORATION and S. & S. Corrugating Paper Machinery Co., Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. EMPIRE CORRUGATED CONTAINER CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. CORRUGATING MACHINERY CORPORATION and S. & S. Corrugating Paper Machinery Co., Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PROGRESSIVE CORRUGATED PAPER MACHINERY CO., Inc., Defendant-Appellee.
Nos. 129, 130.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Jan. 5, 1931.
Hans v. Briesen and Fred A. Klein, both of New York City, for appellants.
Ward, Crosby & Neal, of New York City (Kenneth S. Neal, of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.
Before MANTON, L. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Decrees [Corrugating Machinery Corporation v. Progressive Corrugated Paper Machinery Co., 47 F.(2d) 273] affirmed.