Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles Olusheyi OGUNNOWO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-10-25
Citations: 111 F. App'x 530
Docket Number: No. 04-50120; D.C. No. CR-03-01022-JFW-2
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Charles Olusheyi OGUNNOWO, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 111
Pages: 530–530

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Charles Olusheyi OGUNNOWO, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 04-50120.
D.C. No. CR-03-01022-JFW-2.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 14, 2004.
Decided Oct. 25, 2004.
Antoine F. Raphael, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, Plaintiff-Appellee.
Anthony E. Alexander, Esq., Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before KLEINFELD, TASHIMA and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Charles Olusheyi Ogunnowo appeals his guilty plea conviction and 24-month sentence imposed for conspiracy and fraudulent use of an unauthorized access device, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a)(2), (b), and (c)(1)(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Ogunnowo has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Ogunnowo has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. We therefore GRANT counsel's motion to withdraw and AFFIRM the district court's judgment.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.