Case Name: In re: Jerry SINGLETARY, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-02-03
Citations: 86 F. App'x 584
Docket Number: No. 03-6882
Parties: In re: Jerry SINGLETARY, Petitioner.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 86
Pages: 584–585

Head Matter:
In re: Jerry SINGLETARY, Petitioner.
No. 03-6882.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 20, 2003.
Decided Feb. 3, 2004.
Jerry Singletary, Petitioner pro se.
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Jerry Singletary petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his application for a certificate of appealability. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the docket sheet reveals that the district court entered an oral order denying the motion as moot and directing the Clerk of the Court to docket the motion and forward it to this Court for disposition. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Singletary's case, we grant Singletary leave to proceed in forma pauperis but deny the mandamus petition as moot. We also deny the Government's motion to consolidate this case with United States v. Singletary, Case No. 03-7259. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED