Case Name: Willie SEALS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-05-13
Citations: 598 So. 2d 285
Docket Number: No. 91-0232
Parties: Willie SEALS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: LETTS, POLEN and FARMER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 598
Pages: 285–285

Head Matter:
Willie SEALS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 91-0232.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
May 13, 1992.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Paul E. Petillo, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James J. Carney, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We find no reversible error as to appellant's several points regarding his conviction. However, we reverse appellant's sentence because the trial court failed to enter a written statement of the reasons for its departure from the recommended guidelines sentence until approximately six (6) days after its oral pronouncement of those reasons. State v. Lyles, 576 So.2d 706, 709 (Fla.1991). See Ree v. State, 565 So.2d 1329 (Fla.1990). We remand for resentenc-ing with no possibility of departure from the guidelines. Owens v. State, 598 So.2d 64 (Fla.1992); Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla.1990).
AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART> and REMANDED.
LETTS, POLEN and FARMER, JJ., concur.