Case Name: Michael C. GIARDINA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2015-02-20
Citations: 160 So. 3d 476
Docket Number: No. 2D14-1206
Parties: Michael C. GIARDINA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ALTENBERND, BLACK, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 160
Pages: 476–476

Head Matter:
Michael C. GIARDINA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D14-1206.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Feb. 20, 2015.
Rehearing Denied March 16, 2015.
Michael C. Giardina, pro se.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Dawn A. Tiffin, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Michael C. Giardina appeals the denial of his petition for habeas corpus. This court ordered briefing from the State and has fully reviewed the record. At trial, the jury received a modified instruction on justifiable use of deadly force. On direct appeal, Mr. Giardina unsuccessfully argued that the trial court committed fundamental error by omitting a portion of the instruction explaining that deadly force can be permissible when defending against the imminent commission of a forcible felony by an aggressor. See Giardina v. State, 986 So.2d 608 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (table decision). In this petition for habeas corpus, which was filed in 2013, he argues that the trial court committed fundamental error resulting in a manifest injustice when it instructed the jury with standard language that he had no duty to retreat if he was not engaged "in an unlawful activity." Although we agree with Mr. Giardina that this issue was not resolved in prior proceedings, we do not agree that this instruction on the duty to retreat was erroneous, much less that it resulted in the type of manifest injustice that caused the Fourth District to give relief in Furney v. State, 115 So.3d 1095 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013), which addressed the "forcible felony" jury ' instruction discussed in Martinez v. State, 981 So.2d 449 (Fla.2008).
Affirmed.
ALTENBERND, BLACK, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.