Case Name: Benedicta I. ABODE, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-07-11
Citations: 138 F. App'x 567
Docket Number: No. 05-1000
Parties: Benedicta I. ABODE, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 138
Pages: 567–568

Head Matter:
Benedicta I. ABODE, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 05-1000.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 15, 2005.
Decided: July 11, 2005.
Marc Seguinót, The Helein Law Group, LLP, McLean, Virginia, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Papú Sandhu, Senior Litigation Counsel, Theodore C. Hirt, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Benedicta I. Abode, a native and citizen of Nigeria, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("Board") denying her motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board's order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Abode's motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2005). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Abode, No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ] (B.I.A. Nov. 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED