Case Name: In the Matter of Dorothy H. Schwartz, Respondent, v. Isidore Bogen et al., Constituting the Board of Examiners of the Board of Education of the City of New York, Appellants
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1968-04-18
Citations: 21 N.Y.2d 1020
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Dorothy H. Schwartz, Respondent, v. Isidore Bogen et al., Constituting the Board of Examiners of the Board of Education of the City of New York, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 21
Pages: 1020–1021

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Dorothy H. Schwartz, Respondent, v. Isidore Bogen et al., Constituting the Board of Examiners of the Board of Education of the City of New York, Appellants.
Argued April 9, 1968;
decided April 18, 1968.
J. Lee Rankin, Corporation Counsel (Robert E. Hugh and Stanley Buchsbaum of counsel), for appellants.
William J. Williams for respondent.

Opinion:
Order modified and, as so modified, affirmed, without, costs in the following memorandum: On oral argument, appellants stated that checklists, rather than standard answers, were used in rating essay parts of the examination. Therefore, the Appellate Division's order is modified to the extent of requiring appellants to furnish respondent with all materials used in determining the correctness or quality of the answers in the essay parts of the examination.
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Keating, Breitel and Jasen.