Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos Alberto PEREZ-FULGENCIO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-03-06
Citations: 468 F. App'x 216
Docket Number: No. 12-6045
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos Alberto PEREZ-FULGENCIO, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 468
Pages: 216–216

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos Alberto PEREZ-FULGENCIO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-6045.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 21, 2012.
Decided: March 6, 2012.
Carlos Alberto Perez-Fulgencio, Appellant Pro Se. Grayson A. Hoffman, Jeb Thomas Terrien, Assistant United States Attorneys, Harrisonburg, Virginia; Ronald Mitchell Huber, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Ap-pellee.
Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Carlos Perez-Fulgencio appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Perez-Fulgencio, No. 5:01-cr-30058-SGW-l (W.D.Va. Dec. 1, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.