Case Name: Lillian Pokedoff et al., Appellants, v. Fred Glatman et al., Doing Business under the Name of Glatman's Maple Grove, Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1957-11-21
Citations: 3 N.Y.2d 949
Docket Number: 
Parties: Lillian Pokedoff et al., Appellants, v. Fred Glatman et al., Doing Business under the Name of Glatman’s Maple Grove, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 3
Pages: 949–951

Head Matter:
Lillian Pokedoff et al., Appellants, v. Fred Glatman et al., Doing Business under the Name of Glatman’s Maple Grove, Respondents.
Submitted October 15, 1957;
decided November 21, 1957.
Abraham Epstein and Max A. Chodosh for appellants.
Sidney Advocate, E. Edan Spencer and Sidney Appelbaum for respondents.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis and Burke. Chief Judge Conway and Judge Desmond dissent and vote to reverse and grant a new trial upon the ground that a question of fact was presented which should have been submitted to the jury.