Case Name: Vera Shepard CHARLOT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Honorable Michael B. DONLEY, Secretary of the Air Force, Defendant-Appellee, and Terry St. Peter; Dawn M. Moore; Clayton D. Leishman; United States of America, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-02-05
Citations: 592 F. App'x 209
Docket Number: No. 14-1650
Parties: Vera Shepard CHARLOT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Honorable Michael B. DONLEY, Secretary of the Air Force, Defendant-Appellee, and Terry St. Peter; Dawn M. Moore; Clayton D. Leishman; United States of America, Defendants.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 592
Pages: 209–209

Head Matter:
Vera Shepard CHARLOT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Honorable Michael B. DONLEY, Secretary of the Air Force, Defendant-Appellee, and Terry St. Peter; Dawn M. Moore; Clayton D. Leishman; United States of America, Defendants.
No. 14-1650.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 9, 2015.
Decided: Feb. 5, 2015.
Vera Shepard Chariot, Appellant Pro Se. Terri Hearn Bailey, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Vera Shepard Chariot appeals the district court's orders accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to Defendants in this action alleging defamation and multiple violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Chariot v. Donley, No. 3:11-cv-00579-MBS (D.S.C. Mar. 29 & Sept. 30, 2013; Mar. 31, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.