Case Name: Fasil Atle DESTA, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-04-07
Citations: 272 F. App'x 271
Docket Number: No. 07-1541
Parties: Fasil Atle DESTA, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 272
Pages: 271–271

Head Matter:
Fasil Atle DESTA, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 07-1541.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 17, 2008.
Decided: April 7, 2008.
Linda A. Dominguez, L A Dominguez Law, LLC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Petitioner. Jeffrey S. Bucholtz, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Michelle Gorden Latour, Assistant Director, Jamie M. Dowd, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Fasil Atle Desta, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("Board") denying his motion to reconsider a prior order of the Board denying a motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have reviewed the administrative record and find no abuse of discretion in the Board's order. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2007) (standard of review); Jean v. Gonzales, 435 F.3d 475, 481, 482-83 (4th Cir. 2006) (same). We therefoi'e deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Desta, No. [ AXXXXX-XXX ] (B.I.A. May 18, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.