Case Name: H3 AESTHETICS AND DERMATOLOGY, LLC v. CELTIC CROSS CONSTRUCTION, LLC and Misha Kachkachishvili
Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 2017-11-29
Citations: 232 So. 3d 728
Docket Number: NO. 17-CA-344
Parties: H3 AESTHETICS AND DERMATOLOGY, LLC v. CELTIC CROSS CONSTRUCTION, LLC and Misha Kachkachishvili
Judges: Panel composed of Judges Jude G. Grávois, Marc E. Johnson, and Robert A. Chaisson
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 232
Pages: 728–729

Head Matter:
H3 AESTHETICS AND DERMATOLOGY, LLC v. CELTIC CROSS CONSTRUCTION, LLC and Misha Kachkachishvili
NO. 17-CA-344
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit.
November 29, 2017
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF/APPEL-LEE, H3 AESTHETICS AND DERMATOLOGY, Stephen K. Conroy, Amanda D. Hogue
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLANT, MISHA KACHKACHISHVI-LI, Leslie J. Hill
Panel composed of Judges Jude G. Grávois, Marc E. Johnson, and Robert A. Chaisson

Opinion:
CHAISSON, J.
I t On July 15, 2016, HB Aesthetics and Dermatology, LLC ("H3"), filed a petition for damages in the 24th Judicial District Court in Jefferson Parish naming as defendants Celtic Cross Construction, LLC and Misha Kachkachishvili in a dispute arising out of a construction buildout of doctor's offices and medical spa on property located on Bienville Street in New Orleans.
During the course of the litigation, H3 filed a motion to compel discovery wherein it requested the trial court to compel Mr. Kachkachishvili to respond to interrogatories and requests for production that it had propounded upon him. Four days before the scheduled hearing on the motion to compel, Mr. Kachkachishvili produced responses to the discovery. After the hearing on the motion, the trial court rendered judgment in which it declared the Motion to Compel Discovery moot because Mr. Kachkachishvili had produced the discovery responses; however, the trial court ordered Mr. Kachkachishvili to pay attorney's fees and costs associated with the motion. It is froni that portion of the judgment that ordered' him to pay attorney's fees and costs that Mr. Kachkachishvili now appeals.
DISCUSSION
.Pursuant to Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure article. 1841, a judgment that does not determine the merits of a case but only' preliminary matters in the course of the action is an interlocutory judgment. An interlocutory judgment is appealable only when expressly provided by law. La. C.C.P. art. 2083(C). A judgment declaring a motion to compel discovery moot and awarding attorney's fees and costs for the bringing of that motion is an interlocutory judgment. Gorvine v. Travelers Ins. Cos., 98-0287 (La. App. 4 Cir. 11/18/98), 724 So.2d 248, 250; Succession of Holliday, 576 So.2d 1155, 1156 (La. App. 3 Cir. 1991), writ denied, 581 So.2d 708 (La. 1991). We therefore have no appellate jurisdiction to consider the merits of the trial court's ruling. An appeal may be dismissed at any time for | Jack of jurisdiction of the appellate court. La. C.C.P. art. 2162; Green Tree Servicing, LLC v. Chopin, 16-244 (La. App. 5 Cir. 12/07/16), 207 So.3d 631; O'Krepki v. O'Krepki, 17-130 (La. Ápp. 5 Cir. 10/25/17), 229 So.3d 647, 2017 WL 4799981, 2017 La. App. LEXIS 2047. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.
APPEAL DISMISSED