Case Name: Pocahontas Tanning Company, Appellant, v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Insurance Company of New York, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1926-11-16
Citations: 243 N.Y. 644
Docket Number: 
Parties: Pocahontas Tanning Company, Appellant, v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Insurance Company of New York, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 243
Pages: 644–644

Head Matter:
Pocahontas Tanning Company, Appellant, v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Insurance Company of New York, Respondent.
(Argued October 19, 1926;
decided November 16, 1926.)
Martin A. Schenck, Edward Cornell and Emily C. Holt for appellant.
Edgar J. Nathan and W. Calvin Chestnut for respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground plaintiff's alleged loss was not covered by policy.