Case Name: Shannon CAUSION-EL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patrick CONROY, Warden; Attorney General for the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-01-11
Citations: 23 F. App'x 177
Docket Number: No. 01-7354
Parties: Shannon CAUSION-EL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patrick CONROY, Warden; Attorney General for the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 23
Pages: 177–178

Head Matter:
Shannon CAUSION-EL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patrick CONROY, Warden; Attorney General for the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 01-7354.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 19, 2001.
Decided Jan. 11, 2002.
Shannon Causion-El, Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Shannon Causion-El seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Causion-El v. Conroy, No. CA-00-1199 AMD (D.Md. Aug. 7, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.