Case Name: Michael K. PUTNAM, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. David T. DUNCAN, M.D., et al., Defendants/Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1997-02-25
Citations: 941 S.W.2d 709
Docket Number: No. 70074
Parties: Michael K. PUTNAM, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. David T. DUNCAN, M.D., et al., Defendants/Respondents.
Judges: Before RHODES RUSSELL, P. J., and PUDLOWSKI and SIMON, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 941
Pages: 709–709

Head Matter:
Michael K. PUTNAM, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. David T. DUNCAN, M.D., et al., Defendants/Respondents.
No. 70074.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Feb. 25, 1997.
Rehearing Denied March 31, 1997.
Michael J. McDonnell, St. Louis, for plaintiff/appellant.
Theodore G. Pashos, St. Louis, for defendants/respondents.
Before RHODES RUSSELL, P. J., and PUDLOWSKI and SIMON, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Michael K. Putnam appeals from a jury verdict in favor of defendant, David T. Duncan, M.D., in a medical malpractice action involving the death of his wife, Karen Putnam. We affirm.
An extended opinion would serve no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).