Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony Lamar SNIPE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-03-01
Citations: 512 F. App'x 373
Docket Number: No. 12-8073
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony Lamar SNIPE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 512
Pages: 373–373

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony Lamar SNIPE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-8073.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 26, 2013.
Decided: March 1, 2013.
Anthony Lamar Snipe, Appellant Pro Se. Sean Kittrell, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Lamar Snipe appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Snipe, No. 2:02-cr-00833-PMD-1 (D.S.C. Nov. 27, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.