Case Name: Louis Edison et al., Respondents, v. Julius Perlbinder et al., Individually and as Executors of Joseph Perlbinder, Deceased, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1946-10-14
Citations: 271 A.D.2d 794
Docket Number: 
Parties: Louis Edison et al., Respondents, v. Julius Perlbinder et al., Individually and as Executors of Joseph Perlbinder, Deceased, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 271
Pages: 794–794

Head Matter:
Louis Edison et al., Respondents, v. Julius Perlbinder et al., Individually and as Executors of Joseph Perlbinder, Deceased, Appellants.

Opinion:
Appeal by defendants from an order-denying their motion to resettle a proposed case,on appeal by striking therefrom the record of a separate and distinct proceeding in contempt that grew out of the trial of the action. Order reversed on the law, without costs, and the motion granted, without costs. The record of a separate and distinct proceeding is not a proper part of the record on appeal from a judgment. (Wierichs v. Innis, 32 Mise. 462, affd. 56 App. Div. 625; 6 Carmody on Hew York Pleading and Practice, § 243.) Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur; Lewis, P. J., not voting.