Case Name: Joseph M. Perrine et al., respondents, v. William D. Perrine et al., appellants
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1903-06-19
Citations: 65 N.J. Eq. 719
Docket Number: 
Parties: Joseph M. Perrine et al., respondents, v. William D. Perrine et al., appellants.
Judges: For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Van Syckel, Garrison, Garretson, Bogert, Voori-iees, Vroom — 7.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 65
Pages: 719–719

Head Matter:
Joseph M. Perrine et al., respondents, v. William D. Perrine et al., appellants.
[Filed June 19th, 1903.]
Mr. Haward W. Ilayes,- for the appellant.
Mr. John T. Rosell, for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from should be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Pitney, delivered in the court of chancery, and reported in 18 Dick. Ch. Rep. 483.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Van Syckel, Garrison, Garretson, Bogert, Voori-iees, Vroom — 7.
For reversal — Dixon, Fort, Hendrickson, Swayze, Vredenburgi-i — 5.