Case Name: Melissa MITCHELL, Jennifer Frietsch, and Scott Oros, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ABERCROMBIE & FITCH CO. and Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-03-28
Citations: 225 F. App'x 362
Docket Number: No. 06-3737
Parties: Melissa MITCHELL, Jennifer Frietsch, and Scott Oros, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ABERCROMBIE & FITCH CO. and Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 225
Pages: 362–362

Head Matter:
Melissa MITCHELL, Jennifer Frietsch, and Scott Oros, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ABERCROMBIE & FITCH CO. and Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 06-3737.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
March 28, 2007.
Before: COOK and McKEAGUE, Circuit Judges, and EDGAR, Senior District Judge.
The Hon. R. Allan Edgar, Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Tennessee, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The district court addressed all issues in this case in a comprehensive, well reasoned opinion entered on March 31, 2006, granting Abercrombie & Fitch Co.'s motion for summary judgment and dismissing all claims under federal and Ohio law. This Court AFFIRMS the district court's judgment on the basis of that opinion. This Court notes, however, that without saying so explicitly, the district court in effect declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the plaintiffs claims under Pennsylvania law. As acknowledged by counsel for Abercrombie & Fitch Co. at oral argument, the plaintiffs' claims under Pennsylvania law are deemed to have been dismissed without prejudice by the district court.