Case Name: Robert CAKORA, a minor, by his father and next friend, Robert A. Cakora, and Robert A. Cakora, Individually, Appellants, v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1980-09-16
Citations: 388 So. 2d 31
Docket Number: No. 80-481
Parties: Robert CAKORA, a minor, by his father and next friend, Robert A. Cakora, and Robert A. Cakora, Individually, Appellants, v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, Appellee.
Judges: Before NESBITT, BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 388
Pages: 31–31

Head Matter:
Robert CAKORA, a minor, by his father and next friend, Robert A. Cakora, and Robert A. Cakora, Individually, Appellants, v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, Appellee.
No. 80-481.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Sept. 16, 1980.
Keyfetz & Poses, Miami, for appellants.
Robert A. Ginsburg, County Atty. and Jack M. Sobel, Asst. County Atty., for ap-pellee.
Before NESBITT, BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The trial court entered a final summary judgment in favor of the county on the sole basis that the duty of care owing to Cakora as set forth in Section 375.251, Florida Statutes (1977), was not violated. Subsequent to the entry of this judgment, we held in Metropolitan Dade County v. Yelvington, 389 So.2d 1113 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), that Section 375.251, Florida Statutes (1977), is not applicable to counties. Finding no other basis upon which to uphold the entry of the trial court's judgment, we reverse.
Reversed and remanded.