Case Name: Maas Brothers, a Corp., v. H. Walter Fuller, et al.
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1935-10-09
Citations: 121 Fla. 175
Docket Number: 
Parties: Maas Brothers, a Corp., v. H. Walter Fuller, et al.
Judges: Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Brown, Buford, and Davis, J. J., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 121
Pages: 175–176

Head Matter:
Maas Brothers, a Corp., v. H. Walter Fuller, et al.
163 So. 470.
Opinion Filed October 9, 1935.
Hampton, Bull & Crom, for Plaintiff in Error;
Cook & Harris & J. Uhle Bethell, for Defendants in Error;

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Plaintiff in error states that there are two questions presented in this case. From a perusal of the record, we conceive that there is only one question presented and that is, whether or not there was any evidence which would support a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. This is true because the court directed a verdict in favor of the defendant.
A careful perusal of the bill of exceptions, which we have considered although its propriety in the record is seriously questioned, shows that there was evidence to support a verdict in favor of the plaintiff and, therefore, the judgment should be affirmed.
It is so ordered.
Affirmed.
Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Brown, Buford, and Davis, J. J., concur.