Case Name: James William POTTS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1999-12-16
Citations: 752 So. 2d 554
Docket Number: No. 93,546
Parties: James William POTTS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 752
Pages: 554–555

Head Matter:
James William POTTS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 93,546.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Dec. 16, 1999.
Ronald E. Fox, Umatilla, Florida; and Robert Augustus Harper and Steven Brian Whittington of Robert Augustus Harper Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, Florida, for Petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Anthony J. Golden, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, Florida, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PARIENTE, J.
We have for review the opinion in Potts v. State, 710 So.2d 1887 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), which certified conflict with the opinion in State v. Holland, 689 So.2d 1268 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. For the reasons expressed in our opinion in Hayes v. State, 750 So.2d 1 (Fla.1999), the decision of the Fifth District is hereby quashed. We remand to the district court for proceedings consistent with this opinion. It is so ordered.
HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.