Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Antoine Edward YOUNG, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-11-22
Citations: 176 S.W.3d 719
Docket Number: No. ED 84867
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Antoine Edward YOUNG, Appellant.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 176
Pages: 719–719

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Antoine Edward YOUNG, Appellant.
No. ED 84867.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Nov. 22, 2005.
S. Kristina Starke, Gwenda R. Robinson, public defenders, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Dora Fichter, Karen Dramer, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Antoine Young (Young) appeals his convictions and sentence for forcible rape, kidnapping, assault in the second degree, and assault in the third degree. Young contends the trial court erred when it (1) submitted the kidnapping charge to the jury; (2) denied his request to cross-examine the victim regarding a prior arrest; and (3) allowed the prosecution to file, at the close of the evidence, a substitute information that added an alternative charge of assault in the second degree. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the Record on Appeal, and we find no error of law in this case. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).