Case Name: Bruce Allan RENDALL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1984-07-31
Citations: 453 So. 2d 502
Docket Number: No. 84-238
Parties: Bruce Allan RENDALL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and BASKIN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 453
Pages: 502–503

Head Matter:
Bruce Allan RENDALL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 84-238.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 31, 1984.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Beth C. Weitzner, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Calianne P. Lantz, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and BASKIN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This appeal questions the propriety of the trial court revoking the appellant's probation and further alleges error in the trial court failing to correctly give the appellant credit for previous time spent in the county jail. We affirm the revocation. Edwards v. State, 439 So.2d 1028 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Chappell v. State, 429 So.2d 84 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Roth v. State, 406 So.2d 121 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); Aaron v. State, 400 So.2d 1033 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Adams v. State, 330 So.2d 505 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976).
We find merit in the failure to specifically name the amount of time to which the appellant should be credited and therefore remand the matter to the trial court for resentencing. Lund v. State, 396 So.2d 255 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Scherer v. State, 366 So.2d 840 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).
Affirmed in part and reversed in part with directions.