Case Name: John DUNAWAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-05-31
Citations: 681 So. 2d 741
Docket Number: No. 95-00042
Parties: John DUNAWAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: FRANK, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 681
Pages: 741–741

Head Matter:
John DUNAWAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 95-00042.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
May 31, 1996.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Julius J. Aulisio, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ronald Napolitano, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
John Dunaway challenges several conditions of probation that were not orally pronounced by the trial court. We affirm the two conditions involving the possession of weapons and firearms and the use of intoxicants to excess. These are general conditions of probation that do not have to be pronounced at sentencing. See State v. Hart, 668 So.2d 589 (Fla.1996). We strike that portion of condition (12) which requires Dunaway to pay for random drug testing. This is a special condition of probation which must be orally pronounced. Swinton v. State, 670 So.2d 1128 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). In all other respects the. probation order is affirmed.
FRANK, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and QUINCE, JJ., concur.