Case Name: THE STATE, RUCKMAN Prosecutor, v. DEMAREST, Collector
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1884-02-04
Citations: 110 U.S. 400
Docket Number: 
Parties: THE STATE, RUCKMAN Prosecutor, v. DEMAREST, Collector.
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 110
Pages: 400–401

Head Matter:
THE STATE, RUCKMAN Prosecutor, v. DEMAREST, Collector.
IN ERROR TO THE COURT OP ERRORS AND APPEALS OP NEW JERSEY.
Submitted January 10th, 1884.
Decided February 4th, 1884.
Error — Practice.
Grigsby v. Purcell, 90 IT. S. 505, followed ; holding that if the transcript is not filed and the cause docketed during the term to which it is made returnable, or some suificient excuse given for the delay, the writ of error or appeal becomes inoperative, and the cause may be dismissed by the court of its own motion or on motion of the defendant in error or the appellee.
Motion by a defendant in error to docket and dismiss a case.
Mr. Deter W. Stagg for tbe mover.

Opinion:
Mr. Chief Justice Waite
delivered tbe opinion of the court.
This is a motion by Cornebus N. Durie, tbe successor in office of Demarest, tbe defendant in error, to docket and dismiss a case. From the motion papers it appears that Demarest, as collector of tbe township, recovered a judgment against the State, Ruckman prosecutor, in tbe Court of Errors and Appeals of-Ñew Jersey, on the 11th of July, 1806, and that Ruckman sued out a writ of error from this court, gave bond and had citation signed, but never docketed the case here. Ruckman died on the 5th of November, 1882, and Demurest in the summer of 1883.
Upon these facts it is clear that the writ of error had become inoperative for want of prosecution long before it abated, by the death of the parties. Grigsby v. Purcell, 99 U. S. 505, and cases there cited. The exact date when the writ was sued out is not stated, but if it had been delayed until five years after the judgment, there was no time within ten years before the death of Ruckman that he would have been allowed to docket the case in this court, since that could only be done during the term to which the writ was returnable. It seems to us proper, therefore, to declare the suit abated by the death of the parties, and leave the representatives of those in interest to proceed accordingly. An order to that'effect hay be entered.