Case Name: Timothy HEALY, Appellant, v. FOXCRAFT PHILMONT DIVISION GULF & WESTERN MANUFACTURING CO., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1983-04-26
Citations: 429 So. 2d 1368
Docket Number: No. 82-1048
Parties: Timothy HEALY, Appellant, v. FOXCRAFT PHILMONT DIVISION GULF & WESTERN MANUFACTURING CO., Appellee.
Judges: Before BASKIN, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ..
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 429
Pages: 1368–1368

Head Matter:
Timothy HEALY, Appellant, v. FOXCRAFT PHILMONT DIVISION GULF & WESTERN MANUFACTURING CO., Appellee.
No. 82-1048.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 26, 1983.
J. Arthur Hawkesworth, Jr., Miami, for appellant.
Blackwell, Walker, Gray, Powers, Flick & Hoehl and James E. Tribble, Miami, for appellee.
Before BASKIN, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ..

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the judgment entered pursuant to a jury veirdict upon a holding that (1) the trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing deposition testimony of a critical witness to be read to the jury, see Colonnades, Inc. v. Vance Baldwin, Inc., 318 So.2d 515 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975), cert. denied, 330 So.2d 16 (Fla.1976); Fishman v. Liberty Associates, Inc., 196 So.2d 493 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967), writ discharged, 205 So.2d 657 (Fla.1968), and (2) the trial court properly permitted the defendants to use videotapes made by the plaintiff's expert during the course of cross-examination of the expert, see Rayner v. Stauffer Chemical Co., 120 Ariz. 328, 585 P.2d 1240 (1978).
We have examined the other issues presented and find them to be without merit.
Affirmed.