Case Name: ROSS BECKETT v. STATE
Court: Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1919-04-05
Citations: 15 Okla. Crim. 688
Docket Number: No. A-3193
Parties: ROSS BECKETT v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: Oklahoma Criminal Reports
Volume: 15
Pages: 688–688

Head Matter:
ROSS BECKETT v. STATE.
No. A-3193.
Opinion Filed April 5, 1919.
Appeal from District Court, Garfield County; J. C. Robberts, Judge.
H. J. Sturgis, for plaintiff in error.
The Attorney General and W. C. Hall, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tor tne State.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff in error, Ross Beckett, was convicted of keeping a place in the city of Enid with the felonious intent and pul-póse of selling intoxicating liquors. To reverse the judgment rendered on the verdict, he appeals. In the case of Proctor v. State, 15 Okla. Cr. 338, 176 Pac. 771, the statute upon which this prosecution was based, is held unconstitutional and void. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment is reversed.