Case Name: Quinton JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-03-06
Citations: 811 So. 2d 765
Docket Number: No. 4D01-5055
Parties: Quinton JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: WARNER, STEVENSON and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 811
Pages: 765–765

Head Matter:
Quinton JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D01-5055.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
March 6, 2002.
Rehearing Denied April 9, 2002.
Quinton Jackson, Miami, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the order summarily denying appellant's Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion and certify as a question of great public importance the same question certified in Stretcher v. State, 803 So.2d 813 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001):
WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?
WARNER, STEVENSON and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.