Case Name: Robert WHEADON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1991-01-29
Citations: 803 S.W.2d 654
Docket Number: No. 58590
Parties: Robert WHEADON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 803
Pages: 654–654

Head Matter:
Robert WHEADON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. 58590.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Jan. 29, 1991.
Melinda K. Pendergraph, St. Louis, for movant/appellant.
William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Millie Aulbur, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent/respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant appeals after the trial court dismissed his Rule 29.15 motion. His motion was not timely filed. Movant concedes that the Missouri Supreme Court has ruled adversely to his position on this issue in other cases. See Day v. State, 770 S.W.2d 692 (Mo. banc 1989), cert. denied sub nom. Walker v. Missouri, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 186, 107 L.Ed.2d 141 (1989). An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).