Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Douglas JOHNSON, Defendant/Appellant; Douglas JOHNSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1992-03-17
Citations: 825 S.W.2d 72
Docket Number: Nos. 58878, 60208
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Douglas JOHNSON, Defendant/Appellant. Douglas JOHNSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 825
Pages: 72–72

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Douglas JOHNSON, Defendant/Appellant. Douglas JOHNSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Nos. 58878, 60208.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
March 17, 1992.
Melinda K. Pendergraph, Columbia, Clay Grumke, John Klosterman, Brian N. Brown, St. Louis, for defendant/appellant.
William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Joan F. Edwards, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff/respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals from his conviction by a jury of possession of cocaine and was sentenced by the court as a prior offender to five years imprisonment. He also appeals from an order dismissing his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm. We find no reversible error and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).