Case Name: Frederick Webber et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. City of Dunkirk, Appellant-Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1996-04-19
Citations: 226 A.D.2d 1052
Docket Number: Appeal No. 2
Parties: Frederick Webber et al., Respondents-Appellants, v City of Dunkirk, Appellant-Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 226
Pages: 1052–1052

Head Matter:
Frederick Webber et al., Respondents-Appellants, v City of Dunkirk, Appellant-Respondent.
(Appeal No. 2.)
[642 NYS2d 852]

Opinion:
Order affirmed without costs. Same Memorandum as in Webber v City of Dunkirk (226 AD2d 1050 [decided herewith]).
All concur except Lawton and Balio, JJ., who dissent in part and vote to modify in the same dissenting Memorandum as in Webber v City of Dunkirk (226 AD2d 1050, 1051 [decided herewith]). (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Chautauqua County, Gerace, J.—Labor Law.) Present—Denman, P. J., Law-ton, Wesley, Balio and Davis, JJ.