Case Name: William J. CONRAD, Jr., Appellant, v. Barbara M. Methfessel CONRAD, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1983-01-25
Citations: 425 So. 2d 649
Docket Number: No. 82-750
Parties: William J. CONRAD, Jr., Appellant, v. Barbara M. Methfessel CONRAD, Appellee.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 425
Pages: 649–649

Head Matter:
William J. CONRAD, Jr., Appellant, v. Barbara M. Methfessel CONRAD, Appellee.
No. 82-750.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan. 25, 1983.
Gars, Dixon & Shapiro and Robert Dixon, Miami, for appellant.
Ferrell & Ferrell and Milton Ferrell, Miami, for appellee.
Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The parties to this appeal agreed at oral argument that the second and third issues involved in this appeal had been resolved between them leaving only the question of whether the trial court abused his discretion in awarding the wife the marital home as lump sum alimony. We affirm the trial court since no clear abuse of discretion is demonstrated on this record. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980).