Case Name: OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION and Pennsylvania State Police, Petitioners v. STATE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent. Bruce A. Edwards, Joseph R. Kovel, Joseph E. Sarkis, PA State Troopers Association, Intervenors
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2016-08-03
Citations: 163 A.3d 395
Docket Number: No. 76 MAL 2016
Parties: OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION and Pennsylvania State Police, Petitioners v. STATE EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent Bruce A. Edwards, Joseph R. Kovel, Joseph E. Sarkis, PA State Troopers Association, Intervenors
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 163
Pages: 395–395

Head Matter:
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION and Pennsylvania State Police, Petitioners v. STATE EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent Bruce A. Edwards, Joseph R. Kovel, Joseph E. Sarkis, PA State Troopers Association, Intervenors
No. 76 MAL 2016
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
August 3, 2016

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 3rd day of August, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as framed by Petitioners, is as follows:
Did [the] Commonwealth Court erroneously affirm the decision of the State Employees' Retirement Board that union stipends, paid to union officers to-work exclusively for the union, are retirement-covered compensation, when that decision was clearly contrary to the mandates of the State Employees' Retirement Code and inconsistent with decisions of this Honorable Court?