Case Name: Commonwealth v. Young, Appellant
Court: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1966-10-25
Citations: 208 Pa. Super. 478
Docket Number: Appeals, Nos. 561 and 562
Parties: Commonwealth v. Young, Appellant.
Judges: Before Wright, Watkins, Montgomery, Jacobs, Hoffman, and Spaulding, JJ. (Ervin, P. J., absent).
Reporter: Pennsylvania Superior Court Reports
Volume: 208
Pages: 478–482

Head Matter:
Commonwealth v. Young, Appellant.
Argued September 14, 1966.
Before Wright, Watkins, Montgomery, Jacobs, Hoffman, and Spaulding, JJ. (Ervin, P. J., absent).
reargument refused November 16, 1966.
Melvin E. Caine, with him Caine & Di Pasqua, for appellant.
Tram 8. Wedurian, Jr., Assistant District Attorney, with him Ralph B. D’lorio, Assistant District Attorney, Paul R. 8and, First Assistant District Attorney, and Jacques PL. Fox, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.
October 25, 1966:

Opinion:
Opinion
Peb Curiam,
The six judges who heard the argument of this appeal being equally divided in opinion, the judgment of sentence of the court below is affirmed. The defendant is directed to appear in the court below at such time as he may be there called, and that he be by that court committed until he has complied with the sentence, or any part of it which had not been performed at the time the appeal was made a supersedeas.