Case Name: TENNECO, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Matilda Gray STREAM, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1981-02-04
Citations: 394 So. 2d 750
Docket Number: No. 8061
Parties: TENNECO, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Matilda Gray STREAM, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before DOMENGEAUX, STOKER, and LABORDE, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 394
Pages: 750–750

Head Matter:
TENNECO, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Matilda Gray STREAM, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 8061.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.
Feb. 4, 1981.
Camp, Carmouche, Palmer, Barsh & Hunter, A. J. Gray, III, Lake Charles, for defendant-appellant.
Shotwell, Brown & Sperry, George Wear, Jr., Monroe, for plaintiff-appellee.
Before DOMENGEAUX, STOKER, and LABORDE, JJ.

Opinion:
DOMENGEAUX, Judge.
For the reasons this day assigned in the consolidated case of Tenneco, Inc. v. The Harold Stream Investment Trust et al., 394 So.2d 744 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1981) (# 8060), the judgment of the district court which dismissed, without prejudice, the expropriation suit of Tenneco, Inc. which sought a right-of-way across a tract of Cameron Parish land belonging to defendant Matilda Gray Stream, is affirmed. Costs of this appeal are assessed one-half to Tenneco, Inc., and one-half to Matilda Gray Stream.
AFFIRMED.