Case Name: Jason MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Federal Bureau of Prisons; Monongalia General Hospital; Roger King; Greenwald; Antenelli; Watson; Brimson; Oddo; Kamicar; Kern; Haggerty, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-08-06
Citations: 390 F. App'x 260
Docket Number: No. 10-6460
Parties: Jason MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Federal Bureau of Prisons; Monongalia General Hospital; Roger King; Greenwald; Antenelli; Watson; Brimson; Oddo; Kamicar; Kern; Haggerty, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 390
Pages: 260–261

Head Matter:
Jason MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Federal Bureau of Prisons; Monongalia General Hospital; Roger King; Greenwald; Antenelli; Watson; Brimson; Oddo; Kamicar; Kern; Haggerty, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 10-6460.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 27, 2010.
Decided: Aug. 6, 2010.
Jason Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se.
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jason Mitchell appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint, which was properly construed as one filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated- by the district court. Mitchell v. United States, No. 1:08-cv-00195-IMK-JES, 2010 WL 890045 (N.D.W.Va. Mar. 11, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.