Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Charles DALEY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-01-20
Citations: 307 F. App'x 756
Docket Number: No. 08-7713
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Charles DALEY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILLIAMS, Chief, Judge, and TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 307
Pages: 756–756

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Charles DALEY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-7713.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 13, 2009.
Decided: Jan. 20, 2009.
Robert James Wagner, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant.
Richard Daniel Cooke, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILLIAMS, Chief, Judge, and TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Richard Charles Daley appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Daley, No. 3:02-cr-00251-REP-2 (E.D.Va. Aug. 11, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.