Case Name: IN RE: John F. CURRAN, III, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-03-14
Citations: 714 F. App'x 295
Docket Number: No. 18-1095
Parties: IN RE: John F. CURRAN, III, Petitioner.
Judges: Before MOTZ, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 714
Pages: 295–295

Head Matter:
IN RE: John F. CURRAN, III, Petitioner.
No. 18-1095
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 8, 2018
Decided: March 14, 2018
John F. Curran, III, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before MOTZ, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
John F. Curran, III, petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED