Case Name: VIRONMENT, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Charles E. LIGHT, Defendant and Appellee
Court: South Dakota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: South Dakota
Decision Date: 1999-04-07
Citations: 592 N.W.2d 600
Docket Number: No. 20557
Parties: VIRONMENT, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Charles E. LIGHT, Defendant and Appellee.
Judges: [¶ 2.] MILLER, Chief Justice, SABERS, KONENKAMP, and GILBERTSON, Justices, concur.
Reporter: North Western Reporter 2d
Volume: 592
Pages: 600–600

Head Matter:
1999 SD 43
VIRONMENT, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Charles E. LIGHT, Defendant and Appellee.
No. 20557.
Supreme Court of South Dakota.
Considered on Briefs Jan. 14, 1999.
Decided April 7, 1999.
Dennis C. McFarland, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, for plaintiff and appellant.
Timothy L. James of James & Associates, Yankton, South Dakota, for defendant and appellee.

Opinion:
AMUNDSON, Justice.
[¶ 1.] This is a companion case to Yankton Ethanol v. Vironment, #20558, the cases involve identical facts and two identical issues:
1. Whether the court erred in dismissing plaintiffs complaint as barred by the period of limitation set forth in 11 USCS 546(a)(1)(A).
2. Whether the court erred in granting the amended motion to dismiss based upon SDCL 47-7-50.
As to these issues, our decision in Yankton Ethanol controls the motion to dismiss in this case. Therefore, this case is also reversed and remanded
[¶ 2.] MILLER, Chief Justice, SABERS, KONENKAMP, and GILBERTSON, Justices, concur.