Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Calvin MCCROREY, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-05-05
Citations: 325 F. App'x 158
Docket Number: No. 09-6239
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Calvin MCCROREY, Jr., Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 325
Pages: 158–159

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Calvin MCCROREY, Jr., Defendant—Appellant.
No. 09-6239.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 23, 2009.
Decided: May 5, 2009.
Calvin McCrorey, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Calvin McCrorey, Jr., appeals from the district court's order denying his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. McCrorey, No. 0:98-cr-01186-JFA-11 (D.S.C. Jan. 28, 2009) (noting that MeCrorey's Sentencing Guidelines range remained unchanged after Amendment 706 to the Sentencing Guidelines because his statutory maximum sentence was below his guidelines sentencing range). See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5Gl.l(a) (2008) (noting that where statutorily authorized maximum sentence is less than the minimum of the applicable guidelines range, the maximum sentence shall be the guidelines range). We dispense with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions are adequately addressed in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.