Case Name: Joseph Lieber et al. vs. David Kaplan et al.
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1927-04-11
Citations: 106 Conn. 725
Docket Number: 
Parties: Joseph Lieber et al. vs. David Kaplan et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 106
Pages: 725–726

Head Matter:
Joseph Lieber et al. vs. David Kaplan et al.
First Judicial District, Hartford,
January Term, 1927.
Wheeler, C. J., Maltbie, Haines, Hinman and Jennings, Js.
Argued January 6th
—decided April 11th, 1927.
Josvah H. Peck, with whom, on the brief, were Isidor E. Finkelstein and Louis Y. Gaberman, for the appellants (defendants).
James B. Henry, for the appellees (plaintiffs).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The jury might reasonably have found that the defendants represented the rentals of the property sold to the plaintiffs to be $540 more than they in fact were, and that the plaintiffs purchased the property in reliance upon this false representation. Having so found, the jury might, upon the evidence, reasonably have found the damage suffered by the plaintiffs to be more than the amount of the verdict.
There is no error.