Case Name: STATE v. R. Y. McADEN
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 1913-03-05
Citations: 162 N.C. 575
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE v. R. Y. McADEN.
Judges: 
Reporter: North Carolina Reports
Volume: 162
Pages: 575–579

Head Matter:
STATE v. R. Y. McADEN.
(Filed 5 March, 1913.)
1. Courts — Justice of the Peace — Jurisdiction—Words and Phrases —Interpretation of Statutes.
A statute making its violation a misdemeanor, and prescribing a punishment by a fine mot exceeding $50 or imprisonment not exceeding twenty days, “or both,” by the words “or both” takes away the' final jurisdiction of a justice of the peace, and on appeal therefrom the motion of the defendant to quash should be granted in the Superior Court.
2. Courts — Jurisdiction—Justice of the Peace — Constitutional Law —Limitations—Practice.
A statute which attempts to confer on a justice of the peace final jurisdiction where the punishment prescribed therein exceeds the constitutional limitation, is inoperative as to the magistrate’s jurisdiction, except to bind over to the Superior Court, which latter court may then proceed to try the case only upon a true bill of indictment returned by-a grand jury.
Clark, C. J., concurring.
Appeal from Garter, J., at January Term, 1912,'of FeaNK-LIN.
The defendant was indicted for violating chapter 445, Laws of 1909, regulating the use of public highways by motor vehicles.
From the verdict of guilty and the judgment, thereon, the defendant appealed.
Attorney-General Biclcett and Assistant Attorney-General Galvert for the State.
W. II. Yarborough, Jr., for the defendant.

Opinion:
BbowN, J.
The defendant was tried and convicted in the justice of the peace court for violating section 18, chapter 445, Laws of 1909, which reads as follows:
"Any person violating any of the provisions of this 'act shall' be guilty of a misdemeanor, and any one who shall be convicted thereof, or who shall plead' guilty to any complaint for the violation thereof, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding $50 and costs of prosecution, or by imprisonment not exceeding twenty days, or both."
Section 19 provides that "All police justices of any city or justices of the peace of any township where any such violation shall occur shall have jurisdiction to hear, try, and pass sentence for any and all violations of any o'f the provisions of this' act."
The warrant 'in this case was issued by a justice of the peace. The justice adjudged the defendant guilty and impósed a sentence of $10 and costs, from which judgment the defendant appealed to the Superior Court.
In the Superior Court the case was tried de novo upon an amended warrant, without a bill of indictment.
It is plain that under the Constitution the justice's court had no final jurisdiction, as the punishment prescribed for the offense exceeds the limit fixed by the organic law.
The attempt to give the justice of the peace final jurisdiction is rendered abortive by the addition of the words "or both" at the end of section 18 of the act.
The act conferring final jurisdiction is of no effect unless the punishment prescribed is within the constitutional limitation. The justice had no jurisdiction except to bind over, and the Superior Court could proceed to try only upon a true bill of indictment returned by tbe grand jury. S. v. Fesperman, 108 N. C., 770; S. v. Perry, 71 N. C., 523; S. v. Cherry, 72 N. C., 123; S. v. Heidelburg, 70 N. C., 496; S. v. Vermington, 71 N. C., 264; S. v. Hooker, 145 N. C., 581; Connor and Cheshire on Const, of N. C., p. 581.
The point presented by this appeal has been so frequently decided that a further discussion of it is unnecessary.
The motion to quash the proceeding is allowed, and the proceeding dismissed.
Reversed.