Case Name: Sebastian X. MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Theodis BECK, Defendant-Appellee, and North Carolina Department of Corrections, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-08-01
Citations: 441 F. App'x 155
Docket Number: No. 11-6072
Parties: Sebastian X. MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Theodis BECK, Defendant-Appellee, and North Carolina Department of Corrections, Defendant.
Judges: Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 441
Pages: 155–155

Head Matter:
Sebastian X. MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Theodis BECK, Defendant-Appellee, and North Carolina Department of Corrections, Defendant.
No. 11-6072.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 28, 2011.
Decided: Aug. 1, 2011.
Sebastian X. Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth F. Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Ap-pellee.
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Sebastian X. Moore appeals the district court's orders denying relief without prejudice on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Moore v. Beck, No. 5:08-ct-03017-FL (E.D.N.C. Sept. 22, 2009) & 2010 WL 5140008 (Dec. 9, 2010). Moore's "Bias Motion" and motion for "Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(c) Judgment on the Pleadings" are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.