Case Name: KALMAN FLOOR COMPANY, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. JOS. L. MUSCARELLE, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF, v. WAKEFERN FOOD CORP., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT; KALMAN FLOOR COMPANY, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION, JOS. L. MUSCARELLE, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, GEORGE H. FRIEDMAN AND CAROL MOFFATT, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1985-01-31
Citations: 98 N.J. 266
Docket Number: 
Parties: KALMAN FLOOR COMPANY, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. JOS. L. MUSCARELLE, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF, v. WAKEFERN FOOD CORP., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT. KALMAN FLOOR COMPANY, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION, JOS. L. MUSCARELLE, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, GEORGE H. FRIEDMAN AND CAROL MOFFATT, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 98
Pages: 266–267

Head Matter:
KALMAN FLOOR COMPANY, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. JOS. L. MUSCARELLE, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF, v. WAKEFERN FOOD CORP., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT. KALMAN FLOOR COMPANY, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION, JOS. L. MUSCARELLE, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, GEORGE H. FRIEDMAN AND CAROL MOFFATT, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Argued January 7, 1985
Decided January 31, 1985.
Merritt T. Viscardi argued the cause for appellant (Apruzzese & McDermott, Mastro & Murphy, attorneys).
Gerald W Conway argued the cause for respondent Jos. L. Muscarelle, Inc. (Conway & Reiseman and Shannon Z. Taylor, attorneys).
Robert M. Schwartz argued the cause for respondents American Arbitration Association, George H. Friedman and Carol Moffatt (Amdur & Friedrich, attorneys).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 196 N.J.Super. 16 (1984).
For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN and GARIBALDI — 6.
For reversal — None.