Case Name: OSBORN, Appellant, v. LIKENS et ux, Respondents
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1983-03-09
Citations: 62 Or. App. 192
Docket Number: 81-04-8006; CA A24184
Parties: OSBORN, Appellant, v. LIKENS et ux, Respondents.
Judges: Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Young, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 62
Pages: 192–193

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted December 1, 1982,
affirmed as modified March 9,
reconsideration denied May 13,
petition for review denied June 21, 1983 (295 Or 259)
OSBORN, Appellant, v. LIKENS et ux, Respondents.
(81-04-8006; CA A24184)
659 P2d 1021
William D. Cramer, Burns, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Cramer & Pinkerton, Burns.
Frank E. Bocci, Eugene, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Frank E. Bocci, Jr., Eugene.
Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Young, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Plaintiff brought this action for rescission of an agreement to exchange ranch property near Burns for defendants property near Eugene. Defendants counterclaimed for specific performance of the agreement and for damages. Plaintiff appeals from a decree granting defendants specific performance and awarding them $10,000 general damages.
On de novo review, we find that specific performance was properly granted, because the evidence did not support plaintiffs allegation of fraud and because plaintiff waived the contract's time of the essence clause. We find, however, that defendants' evidence does not support an award of money damages and therefore delete that award.
Affirmed as modified.