Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Kyle Broderick, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1998-11-09
Citations: 255 A.D.2d 389
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kyle Broderick, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 255
Pages: 389–390

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kyle Broderick, Appellant.
[679 NYS2d 847]

Opinion:
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Firetog, J.), rendered November 22, 1994, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered.
The court committed reversible error when, after the defense counsel made his peremptory challenges, it permitted the prosecutor to belatedly exercise a peremptory challenge to a still unsworn, prospective juror (see, CPL 270.15 [2]; People v McQuade, 110 NY 284; People v Lebron, 236 AD2d 423; People v De Conto, 172 AD2d 684, affd 80 NY2d 943; see also, People v Alston, 88 NY2d 519).
Further, we note that the court erred in refusing to charge that a reasonable doubt could arise from a lack of evidence as well as from the evidence presented (see, People v Roldos, 161 AD2d 610). Bracken, J. P., Pizzuto, Friedmann and Luciano, JJ., concur.