Case Name: CUMMINS v. BRIDGES
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1914-05-12
Citations: 42 Okla. 200
Docket Number: No. 3505
Parties: CUMMINS v. BRIDGES.
Judges: 
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 42
Pages: 200–200

Head Matter:
CUMMINS v. BRIDGES.
No. 3505.
Opinion Filed May 12, 1914.
(140 Pac. 1146.)
APPEAL AND ERROR — Verdict—Evidence. Where there is competent . evidence reasonably tending to support the verdict of the jury, _ under proper instructions from the court, this court will not disturb the verdict.
(Syllabus by Rittenhouse, C.)
Error from County Court, Jefferson County; B. T. Price, Judge.
Action by W. J. Bridges against B. V. Cummins. Judg-‘. ment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
Affirmed.
Bridges & Vertrees, for plaintiff in error.
J. G. Clift, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
Opinion by
RITTENHOUSE, C.
This is an action on a promissory note for $380.15, balance due on an open account for ' lumber. Defendant filed an answer, asking for credit of $223.39 for material returned; $7.05 for broken glass; $7 expended in obtaining glass; $50 for difference in price and grade of lumber;' and $50 for damages.' These questions were properly submitted" to the jury and a verdict returned in favor of W. J. Bridges and against B. V. Cummins for $180.76. There being sufficient evidence to support the verdict, this court will not disturb the same.
The judgment of the lower court should therefore be affirmed.
By the Court: It is so ordered.