Case Name: Protests 303906-G, etc., of A. Steinhardt & Bro. et al. (New York)
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1938-12-19
Citations: 1 Cust. Ct. 545
Docket Number: No. 40165
Parties: Protests 303906-G, etc., of A. Steinhardt & Bro. et al. (New York).
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Volume: 1
Pages: 545–545

Head Matter:
No. 40165.
Protests 303906-G, etc., of A. Steinhardt & Bro. et al. (New York).

Opinion:
Opinion by
Dallinger, J.
It was stipulated that the atomizers and thimbles in question are chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes or are hollow ware. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained. United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), and Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373) cited.