Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Santos VILLATORO, also known as Miguel Antonio Hernandez-Hernandez, also known as Jose Santo Commando, also known as Carlos Arturo Pineda, also known as Carlos Arnoldo Villatoro, also known as Carlos Pineda, also known as Jose Villatoro-Santos, also known as Commando Villatore, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-08-16
Citations: 438 F. App'x 273
Docket Number: No. 10-41075
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Santos VILLATORO, also known as Miguel Antonio Hernandez-Hernandez, also known as Jose Santo Commando, also known as Carlos Arturo Pineda, also known as Carlos Arnoldo Villatoro, also known as Carlos Pineda, also known as Jose Villatoro-Santos, also known as Commando Villatore, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 438
Pages: 273–274

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Santos VILLATORO, also known as Miguel Antonio Hernandez-Hernandez, also known as Jose Santo Commando, also known as Carlos Arturo Pineda, also known as Carlos Arnoldo Villatoro, also known as Carlos Pineda, also known as Jose Villatoro-Santos, also known as Commando Villatore, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-41075
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 16, 2011.
James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Timothy William Crooks, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, CLEMENT, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Santos Villatoro has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Villatoro has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the AP PEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.