Case Name: E. A. White v. The State
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1907-12-04
Citations: 52 Tex. Crim. 193
Docket Number: No. 3749
Parties: E. A. White v. The State.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Criminal Reports
Volume: 52
Pages: 193–195

Head Matter:
E. A. White v. The State.
No. 3749.
Decided December 4, 1907.
Swindling—Motion for Hew Trial—Charge of the Court—Practice on Appeal.
In the absence of a statement of facts it will be presumed on appeal that the charge of the court was correct and applicable to the facts; besides the objections to the charges of the court were not pointed out specifically in the motion for new trial. Under article 723, Code of Criminal Procedure, there are no fundamental errors on appeal, except those reserved by bill of exceptions or in the motion for new trial.
Appeal from the County Court of Jefferson. Tried below before the Hon. Jas. A. Harrison.
Appeal from a conviction of swindling, a misdemeanor; penalty, ninety days confinement in the county jail.
The opinion states the case.
E. A. White, for appellant.
F. J. McCord, Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

Opinion:
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
This record has neither statement of faetsj nor bills of exception.
The first and second grounds of the motion for new trial relate to the testimony and cannot be revised. The third ground complains of the remarks of the county attorney and refers to the bill of exceptions, which is not in the record. The two remaining grounds are with reference to' the charge and, of course, cannot be revised, in the absence of the statement of facts. The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Henderson, Judge, absent.