Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Lee WINFIELD, Jr., a/k/a Tubbs, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-06-29
Citations: 653 F. App'x 227
Docket Number: No. 16-6463
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Lee WINFIELD, Jr., a/k/a Tubbs, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 653
Pages: 227–228

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Lee WINFIELD, Jr., a/k/a Tubbs, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-6463
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 23, 2016
Decided: June 29, 2016
Robert Lee Winfield, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Kosky, Office of the United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia; Stephen David Schiller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia; Howard Jacob Zlotnick, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Robert Lee Winfield, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Winfield, No. 2:95-cr-00193-REP-1 (E.D. Va. Feb. 22, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED