Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julio ESPINOZA-DEJESUS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-09-13
Citations: 243 F. App'x 321
Docket Number: No. 05-10657
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Julio ESPINOZA-DEJESUS, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 243
Pages: 321–321

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Julio ESPINOZA-DEJESUS, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 05-10657.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 10, 2007.
Filed Sept. 13, 2007.
Brian J. Quarles, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Las Vegas, NV, for PlaintiffAppellee.
Anne R. Traum, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: PREGERSON, KOZINSKI and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
The stipulated motion to remand to the district court to enter an amended judgment is granted. We vacate the sentence and remand to the district court for the purpose of entering an amended judgment.
VACATED and REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.