Case Name: Rev. Roy JONES, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. The CITY OF LUBBOCK, et al., Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1984-04-10
Citations: 730 F.2d 233
Docket Number: No. 83-1196
Parties: Rev. Roy JONES, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. The CITY OF LUBBOCK, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 730
Pages: 233–236

Head Matter:
Rev. Roy JONES, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. The CITY OF LUBBOCK, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
No. 83-1196.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 10, 1984.
Travis D. Shelton, T. Dale Jones, John C. Ross, Jr., City Atty., James P. Brewster, Asst. City Atty., Legal Dept., Lubbock, Tex., for City of Lubbock, et al.
William L. Garrett, Dallas, Tex., Rolando L. Rios, S.W. Voter Registration Ed. Project, San Antonio, Tex., Mark C. Hall, c/o John J. O’Shea, Albert Perez, Tomas Garza, Lubbock, Tex., for Roy Jones, et al.
Lane Arthur, Daniel H. Benson, School of Law, Tex. Tech. Univ., Lubbock, Tex., for Rose Wilson.
Before REAVLEY, RANDALL, and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Treating the suggestion for rehearing en banc as a petition for panel rehearing, it is ordered that the petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. No member of the panel nor Judge in regular active service of this Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc (Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and Local Rule 35), the suggestion for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.