Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edwin Peres BILLONES, a/k/a Edwin Billones, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-08-24
Citations: 198 F. App'x 664
Docket Number: No. 05-50615
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Edwin Peres BILLONES, a/k/a Edwin Billones, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: GOODWIN, REINHARDT, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 198
Pages: 664–664

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Edwin Peres BILLONES, a/k/a Edwin Billones, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 05-50615.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 21, 2006.
Filed Aug. 24, 2006.
Becky S. Walker, Esq., Eliot F. Krieger, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Errol H. Stambler, Esq., Attorney at Law, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant Appellant.
Before: GOODWIN, REINHARDT, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Edwin Peres Billones appeals from the district court's restitution order imposed following his guilty plea conviction for wire fraud, in violation 18 U.S.C. § 1343.
We dismiss in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Jeronimo, 398 F.3d 1149, 1153 (9th Cir.) (stating that the court enforces knowing and voluntary appeal waivers that encompass the grounds raised), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 126 S.Ct. 198, 163 L.Ed.2d 188 (2005); see also United States v. Cardenas, 405 F.3d 1046, 1048 (9th Cir.2005) (holding that the changes in sentencing law imposed by United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), did not render a waiver of appeal involuntary and unknowing).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.