Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Albert H. DOLES, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-10-16
Citations: 48 F. App'x 80
Docket Number: No. 02-7021
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Albert H. DOLES, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 48
Pages: 80–81

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Albert H. DOLES, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-7021.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 24, 2002.
Decided Oct. 16, 2002.
Albert H. Doles, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. N. George Metcalf, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Albert H. Doles, Jr., appeals the district court's orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Doles, No. CR-00-202 (E.D. Va. Mar. 20 & Apr. 25, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Doles' conclusory and speculative claim that the United States entrapped him into distributing drugs within 1000 feet of a school lacks merit.