Case Name: Marvin H. NEWKIRK, Petitioner, v. R. O. CROSBY and Stan Russ, Respondents
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1978-01-24
Citations: 354 So. 2d 431
Docket Number: No. 77-1039
Parties: Marvin H. NEWKIRK, Petitioner, v. R. O. CROSBY and Stan Russ, Respondents.
Judges: ALDERMAN, C. J., and ANSTEAD, J., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 354
Pages: 431–432

Head Matter:
Marvin H. NEWKIRK, Petitioner, v. R. O. CROSBY and Stan Russ, Respondents.
No. 77-1039.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jan. 24, 1978.
Stephen D. Converse and Robert J. Shapiro, Legal Intern, Belle Glade, for petitioner.
Sidney C. Wood, West Palm Beach, and Sales & Christiansen, Palm Beach, for respondent Crosby.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari is denied. The petitioner has not demonstrated that the interlocutory discovery order complained of will cause him injury throughout the remainder of the proceeding or that there will be an inadequate remedy for any such injury by appeal after final judgment. Johnson v. General Motors Corp., 350 So.2d 1119 (4th DCA 1977). Brown v. Bridges, 327 So.2d 874 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976).
ALDERMAN, C. J., and ANSTEAD, J., concur.
DAUKSCH, J., dissents, with opinion.