Case Name: Earl Bihn et al., Appellants, v. Gregory Munch et al., Defendants, and Town of Smithtown, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1994-01-31
Citations: 200 A.D.2d 700
Docket Number: 
Parties: Earl Bihn et al., Appellants, v Gregory Munch et al., Defendants, and Town of Smithtown, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 200
Pages: 700–700

Head Matter:
Earl Bihn et al., Appellants, v Gregory Munch et al., Defendants, and Town of Smithtown, Respondent.
[608 NYS2d 868]

Opinion:
—In an action to recover damages for property damage, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gerard, J.) entered October 25, 1991, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendant Town of Smithtown which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against it.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs payable to the respondent.
The plaintiffs failed to raise any triable issues of fact which preclude the granting of summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendant Town of Smithtown. Bracken, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.