Case Name: Lawrence BELK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2008-05-20
Citations: 257 S.W.3d 136
Docket Number: No. ED 90468
Parties: Lawrence BELK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., BOOKER T. SHAW, J., and KURT S. ODENWALD, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 257
Pages: 136–136

Head Matter:
Lawrence BELK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 90468.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
May 20, 2008.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 15, 2008.
Lawrence Belk, Jefferson City, MO, pro se.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jamie Pamela Rasmussen, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., BOOKER T. SHAW, J., and KURT S. ODENWALD, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Lawrence Belk (Movant) appeals from the trial court's dismissal of his Motion to Reopen 29.15 Proceedings due to Conflict of Interest and Abandonment of Post-Conviction Counsel under Rule 29.15 (Motion).
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
. This motion sought to reopen Movant's post-conviction relief motion filed pursuant to Mo. R.Crim. P. 19.15 (2006). All subsequent rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2006, unless otherwise indicated.