Case Name: Harry LEVINE, also known as Harry Levine Enterprises, Television Surveys and United States Theatre, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RADIO CORPORATION OF AMERICA, National Broadcasting Company, Inc., Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., Revlon, Inc., and William Esty Co., Inc., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1962-05-18
Citations: 302 F.2d 729
Docket Number: No. 355, Docket 27431
Parties: Harry LEVINE, also known as Harry Levine Enterprises, Television Surveys and United States Theatre, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RADIO CORPORATION OF AMERICA, National Broadcasting Company, Inc., Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., Revlon, Inc., and William Esty Co., Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WATERMAN, MOORE and FRIENDLY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 302
Pages: 729–729

Head Matter:
Harry LEVINE, also known as Harry Levine Enterprises, Television Surveys and United States Theatre, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RADIO CORPORATION OF AMERICA, National Broadcasting Company, Inc., Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., Revlon, Inc., and William Esty Co., Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 355, Docket 27431.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit
Argued May 1, 1962.
Decided May 18, 1962.
Harry Levine, pro se.
Cahill, Gordon, Reindel & Ohl, New York City (Robert G. Zeller, Thomas F. Curnin, New York City, of counsel), for defendants-appellees Radio Corporation of America and National Broadcasting Co., Inc.
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, New York City (Peter M. Fishbein, William J. Doyle, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellee Revlon, Inc.
Reinheimer & Cohen, New York City (David Grossberg, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellee William Esty Co., Inc.
Rosenman, Colin, Kaye, Petschek & Freund, New York City (Ambrose Doskow, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellee Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.
Before WATERMAN, MOORE and FRIENDLY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the order entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York granting judgment for the defendants-appellees against plaintiff-appellant.