Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bonnie LAGIGLIO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-01-04
Citations: 164 F. App'x 553
Docket Number: Nos. 03-1114, 04-1095
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bonnie LAGIGLIO, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before Hon. RICHARD A. POSNER, Hon. FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, and Hon. TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 164
Pages: 553–553

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bonnie LAGIGLIO, Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 03-1114, 04-1095.
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Jan. 4, 2006.
David E. Bindi, Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for PlaintiffAppellee.
Michael B. Nash, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before Hon. RICHARD A. POSNER, Hon. FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, and Hon. TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
Bonnie LaGiglio was sentenced for a tax offense. On appeal she argued that the district court erred by sentencing her under the formerly mandatory sentencing guidelines, see United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). We ordered a limited remand, United States v. Paladino, 401 F.3d 471, 484 (7th Cir.2005), and the district court said that it would have imposed the same sentence had it known that the guidelines were advisory. That sentence was within a properly calculated guideline range and presumptively reasonable, see United States v. Mykytiuk, 415 F.3d 606, 608 (7th Cir.2005). Because LaGiglio has not rebutted that presumption, the judgment is AFFIRMED.