Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesus HUMBERTO-CARDENAS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-03-14
Citations: 171 F. App'x 61
Docket Number: No. 04-30465
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jesus HUMBERTO-CARDENAS, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: CANBY, BEEZER, and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 171
Pages: 61–62

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jesus HUMBERTO-CARDENAS, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 04-30465.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 8, 2006.
Decided March 14, 2006.
Rolf H. Tangvald, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Spokane, WA, for PlaintiffAppellee.
Tracy Staab, Federal Public Defender’s Office (Eastern WA & ID), Spokane, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: CANBY, BEEZER, and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Jesus Humberto-Cardenas appeals from the 87-month sentence imposed after pleading guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute over 50 grams of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we remand.
Because appellant was sentenced under the then-mandatory Sentencing Guidelines, and we cannot reliably determine from the record whether the sentence imposed would have been materially different had the district court known that the Guidelines were advisory, we remand to the sentencing court for further proceedings consistent with United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez, 419 F.3d 906, 916 (9th Cir.2005).
REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.