Case Name: Jeffrey A. NADEL and Ronald B. Nadel, Appellants, v. Esther GROSS and Benjamin Gross, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1988-05-03
Citations: 523 So. 2d 1279
Docket Number: No. 87-2989
Parties: Jeffrey A. NADEL and Ronald B. Nadel, Appellants, v. Esther GROSS and Benjamin Gross, Appellees.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 523
Pages: 1279–1280

Head Matter:
Jeffrey A. NADEL and Ronald B. Nadel, Appellants, v. Esther GROSS and Benjamin Gross, Appellees.
No. 87-2989.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 3, 1988.
Jeffrey S. Sandler and Michael J. Getel-man, Miami, for appellants.
Steven Silverman, Miami, for appellees.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the trial court's dismissal of Count I of the complaint alleging fraud on the part of appellees. We find that count properly tracked the elements of fraudulent conduct in setting out the claim and stated facts with sufficient specificity. Peninsular Fla. Dist. Council of Assemblies of God v. Pan Am. Inv., 450 So.2d 1231 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). We affirm the dismissal of Counts II and III for failure to state a cause of action. Connolly v. Sebeco, Inc., 89 So.2d 482 (Fla.1956); First Church of Christ Scientist v. City of St. Petersburg, 344 So.2d 1302 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977).