Case Name: Raymond M. HAMILTON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Walter E. CRAVEN, Warden, Defendant-Appellant (two cases)
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1972-12-21
Citations: 469 F.2d 1394
Docket Number: Nos. 71-2737, 71-2844
Parties: Raymond M. HAMILTON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Walter E. CRAVEN, Warden, Defendant-Appellant (two cases).
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 469
Pages: 1394–1394

Head Matter:
Raymond M. HAMILTON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Walter E. CRAVEN, Warden, Defendant-Appellant (two cases).
Nos. 71-2737, 71-2844.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Dec. 21, 1972.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 29, 1973.
Sanford Svetcov, Deputy Atty. Gen. (argued), W. Eric Collins, Deputy Atty. Gen., Doris H. Maier, Asst. Atty. Gen., Herbert L. Ashby, Chief Asst. Atty. Gen., Evelle J. Younger, Atty. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellant.
Emil Roy Eisenhardt (argued), Lee Van Boven, of Farella, Braun & Martel, San Francisco, Cal., Michael E. Smith, Berkeley, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before WRIGHT, KILKENNY and CHOY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the district judge. Hamilton v. Craven, 350 F.Supp. 1251 (N.D.Cal.1971). We do not reach other issues raised by appellant or by appellee on the cross-appeal.
Judgment affirmed.