Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mohammed Asad SAID, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-01-26
Citations: 362 F. App'x 368
Docket Number: No. 09-7168
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mohammed Asad SAID, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 362
Pages: 368–369

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mohammed Asad SAID, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-7168.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 13, 2010.
Decided: Jan. 26, 2010.
Mohammed Asad Said, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Mohammed Asad Said appeals the district court's order denying his motion to correct judgment and commitment order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Said, No. 1:03-cr-00556-TSE-1 (E.D.Va. Apr. 30, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
See Baca v. United States, 383 F.2d 154, 157 (10th Cir.1967) (where the oral judgment is ambiguous, the written judgment and commitment order may be used to clarify the intention of the sentencing judge); see also United States v. Morse, 344 F.2d 27, 30 (4th Cir.1965) (the court "should carry out the true intention of the sentencing judge as this may be gathered from what he said at the time of sentencing.").