Case Name: Harold Raymond HOOKS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, etc., Defendant-Appellant; Harold Raymond HOOKS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, etc., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1986-02-14
Citations: 781 F.2d 1550
Docket Number: No. 84-3756
Parties: Harold Raymond HOOKS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, etc., Defendant-Appellant. Harold Raymond HOOKS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, etc., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before RONEY and FAY, Circuit Judges, and DUMBAULD , Senior District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 781
Pages: 1550–1551

Head Matter:
Harold Raymond HOOKS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, etc., Defendant-Appellant. Harold Raymond HOOKS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, etc., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 84-3756.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Feb. 14, 1986.
Mitchell D. Franks, Chief Trial Counsel, Walter M. Meginniss, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dept. of Legal Affairs, Civ. Div., Tallahassee, Fla., for defendant-appellant.
James W. Clute, U.S. Dept, of Justice, Civil Rights Div., Washington, D.C., Richard A. Belz, Fla. Institutional Legal Services, Inc., Gainesville, Fla., Peter M. Siegel, Florida Justice Institute, Inc., Miami, Fla., Charles H. Livingston, Sarasota, Fla., for plaintiff-appellee.
Honorable Edward Dumbauld, Senior U.S. District Judge for the Western District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion 11-12-85, 11 Cir., 775 F.2d 1433).
Before RONEY and FAY, Circuit Judges, and DUMBAULD , Senior District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
The petition for rehearing is DENIED. This being an interlocutory appeal for the purpose of getting a single question decided, there has been no decision here as to whether the State's library plan is sufficient to meet the requirements of Bounds v. Smith, 430 U.S. 817, 97 S.Ct. 1491, 52 L.Ed.2d 72 (1977), and we make no observations as to what is necessary in a particular case to meet those standards.
The Court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the court and a majority of the Circuit Judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor of it (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Eleventh Circuit Rule 26), the Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc is also DENIED.