Case Name: Louis Bass, respondent, v Home Securities Company of Woodbridge, New Jersey, appellant
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1927-01-31
Citations: 100 N.J. Eq. 558
Docket Number: 
Parties: Louis Bass, respondent, v Home Securities Company of Woodbridge, New Jersey, appellant,
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 100
Pages: 558–558

Head Matter:
Louis Bass, respondent, v Home Securities Company of Woodbridge, New Jersey, appellant,
[Decided January 31st, 1927.]
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan, who filed the following opinion:
“The bill is by vendor for specific performance of contract of sale; the defense being that the title is not a marketable one. Defendant admits that the facts and circumstances are precisely similar to those in Elmore Development Co. v. Binder, 97 N. J. Eq. 126, and that under the doctrine of stare decisis that case is controlling on the present issue.
“Decree will be advised for complainant, accordingly.”
Messrs. Stamler, Stamler & Koestler, for the respondent.
Mr. Leon L. McElroy and Mr. Leo S. Lowenhopf, for the appellant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Min-turn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbaoh, Campbell, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 13.
For reversal — Hone.