Case Name: Sol D. MAIZELS, Appellee, v. George VAN HOOMISSEN, District Attorney for Multnomah County, Oregon, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1970-09-14
Citations: 429 F.2d 982
Docket Number: No. 25562
Parties: Sol D. MAIZELS, Appellee, v. George VAN HOOMISSEN, District Attorney for Multnomah County, Oregon, Appellant.
Judges: Before CHAMBERS and MERRILL, Circuit Judges, and SWEIGERT, District Judge .
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 429
Pages: 982–982

Head Matter:
Sol D. MAIZELS, Appellee, v. George VAN HOOMISSEN, District Attorney for Multnomah County, Oregon, Appellant.
No. 25562.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Sept. 14, 1970.
Al J. Laue (argued), Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee Johnson, Atty. Gen., Jacob B. Tanzer, Sol. Gen., Salem, Or., for appellant.
Paul R. Meyer (argued) and Marvin S. Nepom (argued), of Kobin & Meyer, Portland, Or., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS and MERRILL, Circuit Judges, and SWEIGERT, District Judge .
Honorable William T. Sweigert, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Upon the authority of Demich, Inc. v. Ferdon, 426 F.2d 643 (9th Cir. 1970), the order for the return of the seized films is affirmed.
Since acquiescence with our decision can, we feel, be assumed until the contrary appears, the case is remanded with instructions that the injunction against future seizures be vacated.