Case Name: In re: Thaddeus D. WILLIAMS, Debtor Sandra S. Spain, Sandra S. Spain Sprouse; Treadegar Construction, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. Thaddeus D. Williams; Michele B. Williams, Defendants-Appellants, v. Roy M. Terry, Jr., Liquidating Trustee for Treadegar Construction, LLC, Movant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-10-01
Citations: 479 F. App'x 463
Docket Number: No. 12-1663
Parties: In re: Thaddeus D. WILLIAMS, Debtor Sandra S. Spain, Sandra S. Spain Sprouse; Treadegar Construction, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. Thaddeus D. Williams; Michele B. Williams, Defendants-Appellants, v. Roy M. Terry, Jr., Liquidating Trustee for Treadegar Construction, LLC, Movant-Appellee.
Judges: Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 479
Pages: 463–463

Head Matter:
In re: Thaddeus D. WILLIAMS, Debtor Sandra S. Spain, Sandra S. Spain Sprouse; Treadegar Construction, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. Thaddeus D. Williams; Michele B. Williams, Defendants-Appellants, v. Roy M. Terry, Jr., Liquidating Trustee for Treadegar Construction, LLC, Movant-Appellee.
No. 12-1663.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 27, 2012.
Decided: Oct. 1, 2012.
Thaddeus D. and Michele B. Williams, Appellants Pro Se. John Craig Smith, Sands Anderson, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Thaddeus D. Williams and Michele B. Williams appeal from the district court's order finding that they lacked standing to appeal from the bankruptcy court's order approving a settlement agreement. Because the terms of the settlement agreement have been consummated, this appeal is moot. See In re Stadium Mgt. Corp., 895 F.2d 845, 847 (1st Cir.1990) ("Absent a stay, the court must dismiss a pending appeal as moot because the court has no remedy that it can fashion even if it would have determined the issues differently."). Accordingly, we grant Roy Terry's motion to dismiss, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.