Case Name: Wayne McLEOD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2005-01-14
Citations: 890 So. 2d 553
Docket Number: No. 5D04-4157
Parties: Wayne McLEOD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: PLEUS, MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 890
Pages: 553–553

Head Matter:
Wayne McLEOD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D04-4157.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Jan. 14, 2005.
Wayne McLeod, Sneads, Pro Se.
No Appearance for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Wayne McLeod appeals the summary denial of his Rule 3.800(a) motion, in which he contended that he should not have been convicted of failure to register as a sex offender. It appears that Mr. McLeod is not challenging his sentence. Instead, he is attempting to challenge his conviction. A challenge to a conviction is not cognizable under Rule 3.800(a). See e.g., Cook v. State, 885 So.2d 911 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Oxendine v. State, 852 So.2d 286 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).
AFFIRMED.
PLEUS, MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.