Case Name: ROGERS v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1919-06-11
Citations: 213 S.W. 637
Docket Number: No. 5401
Parties: ROGERS v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 213
Pages: 637–638

Head Matter:
(85 Tex. Cr. R. 421)
ROGERS v. STATE.
(No. 5401.)
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
May 21, 1919.
On Motion for Rehearing, June 11, 1919.)
1. Criminal Law <g=C08Y(l) — Notice or Appeal — Entry on Minutes oe Court.
Where transcript contained copies of the appeal and recognizance, and clerk’s certificate was to effect that it contained a correct transcript of trial proceedings, but where there was nothing to show an entry on the minutes of the court of the notice of appeal or the recognizance, as required by law, a motion to dismiss the appeal will be sustained.
On Motion for Rehearing.
2. Weapons <§=>9 — Carrying Pistol — Evidence.
In a prosecution for unlawfully carrying a pistol, wherein defendant claimed that he heard a noise behind his house and took his pistol, and ran out the back door some 50-feet, where he met the officers and was arrested, and that the arrest was made on his own rented premises, evidence held not to sustain a conviction.
3. Weapons <©==>9 — Carrying Weapons.
One has a right to have a pistol upon his-own premises.
Appeal from Nacogdoches County Court: J. M. Marshall, Judge.
Mike Rogers was convicted of unlawfully carrying a pistol, and- he appeals.
Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal sustained, and, the record having been perfected, the dismissal previously entered set aside on rehearing, and judgment reversed and cause remanded.
S. M. Adams, of Nacogdoches, for appellant.
E. A. Berry, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Opinion:
MORROW, J.
The Assistant Attorney General has presented a motion to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that the record fails to show an entry on the minutes of the court of the notice of appeal or the recognizance. We find copied in the transcript before us copies of the appeal and recognizance, but the point is made that there is nothing to show that these are recorded in the minutes of the court as required by law. This should appear from the certificate of the clerk, but in the. present instance the certificate is to the effect that it. contains a correct transcript of the proceedings had as the same appeared on file. If, as stated in the certificate, the matters copied in the record are merely from something that is on file, the law is not complied with, and since the only evidence we have to guide us is the certificate of the clerk we must, since the point is made, sustain the motion. We will say, however, that if the notice of appeal and recognizance are in fact recorded in the minutes of the court, that'permission will be granted to amend the certificate to accord with the facts.
The motion is sustained, and the appeal dismissed.
cgnmFor other cases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes