Case Name: Steven BANKHEAD, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-08-19
Citations: 113 S.W.3d 241
Docket Number: No. ED 81627
Parties: Steven BANKHEAD, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 113
Pages: 241–242

Head Matter:
Steven BANKHEAD, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 81627.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Aug. 19, 2003.
Stacy F. Sullivan, Public Defender, Ma-leaner R. Harvey, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
John Munson Morris, III, Assistant Attorney General, Nicole E. Gorovsky, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Steven Bankhead, appeals from a judgment denying on the merits without an evidentiary hearing his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.
The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. Rule 24.035(k). An opin ion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value.
However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).