Case Name: Christine Yuen, Respondent, v. Edwin Yuen K. Wong et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2009-12-08
Citations: 68 A.D.3d 475
Docket Number: 
Parties: Christine Yuen, Respondent, v Edwin Yuen K. Wong et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 68
Pages: 475–476

Head Matter:
Christine Yuen, Respondent, v Edwin Yuen K. Wong et al., Appellants.
[888 NYS2d 884]

Opinion:
In opposition to plaintiffs showing that defendants executed the promissory note and defaulted in payment (see Alard, L.L.C. v Weiss, 1 AD3d 131 [2003]), defendants' evidence was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact concerning any of the payments they claim should be credited against the note. Concur— Tom, J.P., Nardelli, Renwick, Freedman and Roman, JJ.