Case Name: Brian K. ROSE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2013-06-04
Citations: 399 S.W.3d 928
Docket Number: No. ED 99076
Parties: Brian K. ROSE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and LISA S. VAN AMBURG, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 399
Pages: 928–928

Head Matter:
Brian K. ROSE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 99076.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
June 4, 2013.
Lisa M. Stroup, Assistant Public Defender, Office of the Missouri Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and LISA S. VAN AMBURG, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Brian K. Rose (Movant) appeals from the motion court's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Judgment (Judgment) denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his amended Rule 24.035 Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence and Request for Evidentiary Hearing. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).