Case Name: Dean TREVIL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2008-10-01
Citations: 992 So. 2d 346
Docket Number: No. 3D07-1405
Parties: Dean TREVIL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SHEPHERD, CORTIÑAS, and SALTER, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 992
Pages: 346–346

Head Matter:
Dean TREVIL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D07-1405.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 1, 2008.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Harvey Sepler, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Michael C. Greenberg, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SHEPHERD, CORTIÑAS, and SALTER, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Because we find that appellant did not apprise the trial court of the potential discovery violation in a timely manner, we affirm. See Cuciak v. State, 410 So.2d 916, 918 (Fla.1982) ("The probationer has the burden of bringing the violation to the court's attention in a timely manner.").
Affirmed.