Case Name: Wesley Edward SMITH, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PEPSI BOTTLING GROUP, INCORPORATED, PBG, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-03-26
Citations: 271 F. App'x 313
Docket Number: No. 07-1923
Parties: Wesley Edward SMITH, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PEPSI BOTTLING GROUP, INCORPORATED, PBG, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 271
Pages: 313–313

Head Matter:
Wesley Edward SMITH, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PEPSI BOTTLING GROUP, INCORPORATED, PBG, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 07-1923.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 27, 2008.
Decided: March 26, 2008.
Wesley Edward Smith, III, Appellant Pro Se. Ashley Bryan Abel, Jody M. Smitherman, Jackson & Lewis, LLP, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Wesley Edward Smith, III, appeals the magistrate judge's order dismissing his employment discrimination claims and granting summary judgment in favor of Pepsi Bottling Group on their counterclaim for conversion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.- Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. See Smith v. Pepsi Bottling Group, No. 2:06-cv-00040, 2007 WL 2572241 (D.S.C. Aug. 31, 2007). Additionally, we deny Smith's motions for issuance of subpoenas and for preparation of transcripts at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
This case was decided by a magistrate judge with the parties' consent under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2002).