Case Name: ACQUACKANONK WATER COMPANY, EAST JERSEY WATER COMPANY, KEARNEY WATER COMPANY, MONTCLAIR WATER COMPANY AND PASSAIC WATER COMPANY, APPELLANTS, v. BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONERS, RESPONDENT; CITY OF BAYONNE, APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONERS, RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1924-05-19
Citations: 100 N.J.L. 169
Docket Number: 
Parties: ACQUACKANONK WATER COMPANY, EAST JERSEY WATER COMPANY, KEARNEY WATER COMPANY, MONTCLAIR WATER COMPANY AND PASSAIC WATER COMPANY, APPELLANTS, v. BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONERS, RESPONDENT. CITY OF BAYONNE, APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONERS, RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 100
Pages: 169–169

Head Matter:
ACQUACKANONK WATER COMPANY, EAST JERSEY WATER COMPANY, KEARNEY WATER COMPANY, MONTCLAIR WATER COMPANY AND PASSAIC WATER COMPANY, APPELLANTS, v. BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONERS, RESPONDENT. CITY OF BAYONNE, APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONERS, RESPONDENT.
Argued March 12, 1921
Decided May 19, 1924.
For the appellant water companies, L. Ed,ward Herrmann, John B. Humphreys and William M. Wherry (of the New York bar).
For the appellant, City of Bayonne, Treacy & Milton and Eugene T. Sharkey.
For the respondent, Thomas Brotan.

Opinion:
Per Curiam
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, lor the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Mintubn, ICalisch, Black, Katzbnbach, Campbell, Lloyd, Yan Buskirk, Clark, McG-lennon, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.