Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. GEORGE WELLINGTON GLOVER, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1970-07-09
Citations: 3 Or. App. 79
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. GEORGE WELLINGTON GLOVER, Appellant.
Judges: Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Langtry and Fort, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 3
Pages: 79–79

Head Matter:
Argued June 16,
affirmed July 9, 1970
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. GEORGE WELLINGTON GLOVER, Appellant.
471 P2d 864
Hal F. Coe, Klamath Falls, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Beesley & Coe, Klamath Falls.
Jacob B. Tanser, Solicitor General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Lee Johnson, Attorney General, Salem.
Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Langtry and Fort, Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The defendant and one Miller were indicted for the crime of assault and robbery while armed with a dangerous weapon. Defendant was tried separately before a jury and convicted.
Miller was also convicted and his appeal reached this court prior to the one at hand. The facts presented in both trials were substantially identical and all of the issues raised here were considered and disposed of adversely to defendant Glover's contentions in State v. Miller, 2 Or App 87, 465 P2d 894, Sup Ct review denied (1970).
Affirmed.
In oral argument counsel for the defendant stated to the court that his client had asked him to make certain arguments to the court which were not contained in defendant's brief. Counsel was granted permission to do so and did. They add nothing.