Case Name: Daniel K. MCKAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2019-05-07
Citations: 573 S.W.3d 763
Docket Number: No. ED 106621
Parties: Daniel K. MCKAY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Colleen Dolan, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 573
Pages: 763–764

Head Matter:
Daniel K. MCKAY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 106621
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
FILED: May 7, 2019
Emily S. Danker-Feldman, 120 S. Central Ave., Ste. 130, Clayton, MO 63105, for appellant.
Gregory L. Barnes, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.
Before Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Colleen Dolan, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Daniel K. McKay ("McKay") appeals the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing for ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. In his sole point on appeal, McKay argues that appellate counsel was ineffective in failing to cite the proper burden of proof for prejudice in appealing the denial of McKay's speedy trial motion under the Uniform Mandatory Disposition of Detainers Law ("UMDDL").
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).