Case Name: In the Matter of the Claim of Dorothy M. Fourby, Appellant. John E. Sweeney, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1998-02-19
Citations: 247 A.D.2d 739
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Claim of Dorothy M. Fourby, Appellant. John E. Sweeney, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Judges: Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, White, Yesawich Jr. and Spain, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 247
Pages: 739–739

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Claim of Dorothy M. Fourby, Appellant. John E. Sweeney, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
[669 NYS2d 391]

Opinion:
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 28, 1997, which, upon reconsideration, inter alia, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant was discharged from her employment as an attendant at a retirement home after she served a resident a tray of food in a disrespectful and discourteous manner. Claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct. Inasmuch as such conduct was adverse to the employer's interest (see, Matter of Mallard [Sweeney], 245 AD2d 932) and was contrary to its rules (see, Matter of Blaine [Sweeney], 244 AD2d 753), we conclude that substantial evidence supports the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board's decision that claimant was guilty of disqualifying misconduct. To the extent that claimant contends that she should not be assessed a recoverable overpayment, we note that any benefits received are recoverable under the circumstances presented here (see, Labor Law § 597 [4]), despite the employer's agreement not to contest claimant's receipt of such benefits (see, Matter of Caplan [Sweeney], 238 AD2d 660). In any event, in response to claimant's request, the Board has remitted for a hearing on the issue of whether claimant received an overpayment of benefits.
Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, White, Yesawich Jr. and Spain, JJ., concur.
Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.