Case Name: Matthieu Daniel ORTALA, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Madeline Therese BUTHOD, individually, and F.B., by his Next Friend, Madeline Therese Buthod, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2009-01-27
Citations: 275 S.W.3d 374
Docket Number: No. ED 91124
Parties: Matthieu Daniel ORTALA, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Madeline Therese BUTHOD, individually, and F.B., by his Next Friend, Madeline Therese Buthod, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before BOOKER T. SHAW, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and MARY K. HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 275
Pages: 374–375

Head Matter:
Matthieu Daniel ORTALA, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Madeline Therese BUTHOD, individually, and F.B., by his Next Friend, Madeline Therese Buthod, Defendant/Respondent.
No. ED 91124.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Jan. 27, 2009.
Clinton B. Roberts, Roberts & Kinsky, L.L.C., Farmington, MO, for appellant.
Benicia Baker Livorsi, The Family Law Group, LLC, St. Charles, MO, for respondent.
Before BOOKER T. SHAW, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and MARY K. HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Father appeals from the trial court's judgment in a paternity case. The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).
No jurisdictional purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).