Case Name: Joyce A. SHOOK, Respondent, v. Michael VONDER HAAR, Appellant, and Jane Doe VONDER HAAR, Defendant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1992-08-12
Citations: 114 Or. App. 638
Docket Number: 90-2029; CA A69474
Parties: Joyce A. SHOOK, Respondent, v. Michael VONDER HAAR, Appellant, and Jane Doe VONDER HAAR, Defendant.
Judges: Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 114
Pages: 638–638

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted July 6,
reversed August 12, 1992
Joyce A. SHOOK, Respondent, v. Michael VONDER HAAR, Appellant, and Jane Doe VONDER HAAR, Defendant.
(90-2029; CA A69474)
834 P2d 552
Dale Crandall, Salem, argued the cause and filed the reply brief for appellant. On the opening brief were Stephen F. Cook, Richard G. Matson, Lisa E. Lear and Bullivant, Houser, Bailey, Pendergrass & Hoffman, Portland.
Marilyn M. Wall, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief was Wall & Wall, P.C., Portland.
Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Reversed. Kintigh v. Elliott, 280 Or 265, 570 P2d 659 (1977).