Case Name: RICHARD CANTLAY et al., Copartners, etc., Respondents, v. OLDS AND STOLLER INTER-EXCHANGE, etc., Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1930-01-09
Citations: 208 Cal. 644
Docket Number: L. A. No. 11637
Parties: RICHARD CANTLAY et al., Copartners, etc., Respondents, v. OLDS AND STOLLER INTER-EXCHANGE, etc., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Reports
Volume: 208
Pages: 644–645

Head Matter:
[L. A. No. H'637.
In Bank.
January 9, 1930.]
RICHARD CANTLAY et al., Copartners, etc., Respondents, v. OLDS AND STOLLER INTER-EXCHANGE, etc., Appellant.
J. E. Reardon, Wm. M. Abbott, Kingsley W. Cannon, Michael P. Shannon and Thomas A. Wood for Appellant.
J. B. Irsfeld and Douglas Pawcett for Respondents.

Opinion:
PRESTON, J.
— Motion to dismiss appeal. The issue turns upon whether or not on the nineteenth day of Novem ber, 1928, respondents served upon appellant a notice in writing of entry of judgment (sec. 953d, Code Civ. Proe.). This issue is presented to us by affidavits and counter-affidavits of the respective attorneys, aided by the affidavit of a clerk in the office of one of the attorneys and also by certain notations upon the register of the clerk of the court. No benefit would result from a detailed recital of the claims of the parties. We feel that it is only necessary to say that the issue made rests upon a very sharp conflict of evidence and is between reputable attorneys. To our mind it is clouded with grave doubt. This being true, our duty requires a denial of the motion, and it is so ordered.
Waste, C. J., Curtis, J., Seawell, J., Richards, J., Shenk, J., and Langdon, J., concurred.