Case Name: David Lackomowitz, Appellant, v. Jerome E. Bates and Leonard W. Bates, Copartners, etc., and Another, Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1915-05
Citations: 168 A.D. 968
Docket Number: 
Parties: David Lackomowitz, Appellant, v. Jerome E. Bates and Leonard W. Bates, Copartners, etc., and Another, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 168
Pages: 968–968

Head Matter:
David Lackomowitz, Appellant, v. Jerome E. Bates and Leonard W. Bates, Copartners, etc., and Another, Respondents.

Opinion:
The parties hereto having stipulated in open court that this ease may be disposed of by a court of four, the decision is as follows: Judgment and .order, in so far as they affect defendant McGonigle, affirmed, without costs; in so far as they affect the defendants Bates, reversed and new trial granted, with costs against appellants Bates to abide the event. (See Code Civ. Proc. § 507; Ferguson v. Crawford, 70 N. Y. 253; Sinnott v. Sanan, 156 App. Div. 323.) There is no pleading nor proof which makes it proper for us to pass upon the effect of a motion asserted to have been made in the Municipal Court to set aside the judgment on the ground that the defendant in that action was not served with summons; therefore, that question is left undetermined by this appeal. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton and Rich, JJ., concurred.