Case Name: STORM, Respondent, v. ARMOUR, Appellant
Court: South Dakota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: South Dakota
Decision Date: 1933-05-15
Citations: 61 S.D. 304
Docket Number: File Nos. 7239, 7358
Parties: STORM, Respondent, v. ARMOUR, Appellant.
Judges: RUDOLPH, P. J., and POLLEY, CAMPBELL, ROBERTS, and.WARREN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: South Dakota Reports
Volume: 61
Pages: 304–304

Head Matter:
STORM, Respondent, v. ARMOUR, Appellant.
(248 N. W. 491.)
(File Nos. 7239, 7358.
Opinion filed May 15, 1933.)
Atwater & Helm, of Sturgis, for Appellant.
H. P. Fellozzis, of Rapid City, Dan McCutchen, of Belle Fourc'he, Joseph Coursey, of Rapid City, and C. L. Brady, of Buffalo, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The defendant has appealed from a judgment based upon findings of fact and conclusions of law entered by the trial court. The plaintiff has attempted to file a cross-appeal from the judgment and order denying a motion for a new trial. The record is confused. It is apparent, however, that the findings of fact 'will not support the conclusions of law or judgment.
The case is reversed, and a new trial ordered. Costs will be taxed in this court against the plaintiff below.
RUDOLPH, P. J., and POLLEY, CAMPBELL, ROBERTS, and.WARREN, JJ., concur.