Case Name: RBES, L.C., et al., Petitioners, v. Armando C. SANTANA, Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-11-01
Citations: 770 So. 2d 277
Docket Number: No. 3D00-2814
Parties: RBES, L.C., et al., Petitioners, v. Armando C. SANTANA, Respondent.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and SHEVIN, and RAMIREZ, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 770
Pages: 277–277

Head Matter:
RBES, L.C., et al., Petitioners, v. Armando C. SANTANA, Respondent.
No. 3D00-2814.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 1, 2000.
Vila, Padrón & Carrillo, and Pedro R. Carrillo, Coral Gables, for appellants.
Armando C. Santana, in proper person.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and SHEVIN, and RAMIREZ, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, Rodriguez-Betancourt & Elso, P.A., has filed this petition seeking a writ of certiorari to quash a trial court order dated September 7, 2000, granting a motion to inspect a computer belonging to petitioner, which is a non-party to the litigation. In his response, Armando C. Santana, respondent, asserts that this petition may be rendered moot as petitioner is being served with a subpoena duces tecum, the proper mechanism for obtaining discovery from non-parties. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.351. We interpret this an admission that the petition is well-taken and grant the petition, quashing the order of the trial court.