Case Name: Richard J. McAllan et al., Appellants, v. Luis R. Marcos et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1999-06-22
Citations: 262 A.D.2d 192
Docket Number: 
Parties: Richard J. McAllan et al., Appellants, v Luis R. Marcos et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 262
Pages: 192–193

Head Matter:
Richard J. McAllan et al., Appellants, v Luis R. Marcos et al., Respondents.
[693 NYS2d 528]

Opinion:
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marylin Diamond, J.), entered November 24, 1997, which granted defendants' motion for dismissal of the complaint, unanimously modified, on the law, insofar as to declare that Local Laws, 1996, No. 20 of the City of New York, to the extent challenged herein, was validly enacted, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
Contrary to plaintiffs' contention, the subject enabling statute (McKinney's Uncons Laws of NY § 7385 [9] [New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation Act § 5 (9); L 1969, ch 1016, § 1]) does not mandate maintenance of ambulance services by the Health and Hospitals Corporation itself (cf., Council of City of N. Y. v Giuliani, 93 NY2d 60). The mere authorization in the statute for the corporation's provision of such services is not tantamount to the mandate that plaintiffs would have us find (see, Matter of Hamburg v McBarnette, 83 NY2d 726, 733). Accordingly, the contested transfer of ambulance services from the Health and Hospitals Corporation to the New York City Fire Department was not accomplished in violation of that statute and did not require an amendment thereof. We modify only to declare explicitly what is implied by Supreme Court's disposition (see, Lanza v Wagner, 11 NY2d 317, 334, cert denied 371 US 901). We have considered plaintiffs' remaining arguments and find them to be unavailing. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Tom and Wallach, JJ.