Case Name: Herman Rose, by William Rose, His Guardian ad Litem, and William Rose, Individually, Appellants, v. Yorklyn Construction Company, Inc., Defendant, and Underpinning and Foundation Company, Inc., Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1934-01
Citations: 241 A.D. 630
Docket Number: 
Parties: Herman Rose, by William Rose, His Guardian ad Litem, and William Rose, Individually, Appellants, v. Yorklyn Construction Company, Inc., Defendant, and Underpinning and Foundation Company, Inc., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 241
Pages: 630–630

Head Matter:
Herman Rose, by William Rose, His Guardian ad Litem, and William Rose, Individually, Appellants, v. Yorklyn Construction Company, Inc., Defendant, and Underpinning and Foundation Company, Inc., Respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to appellants to abide the event, upon the ground that plaintiffs made out a cause of action. (Hyland v. Cobb, 252 N. Y. 325; Dickson v. McCoy, 39 id. 400; Buchanan v. Stout, 139 App. Div. 204; Quilty v. Battie, 135 N. Y. 201; Brice v. Bauer, 108 id. 428; Keenan v. Gutta Percha Manfg. Co., 46 Hun, 544; Hahnke v. Friederich, 140 N. Y. 224; Holzer v. Rosenberg, 209 App. Div. 823.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.