Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Terrence Arnez DANIELS, a/k/a Tee, a/k/a Heck, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-09-02
Citations: 332 F. App'x 22
Docket Number: No. 09-6634
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Terrence Arnez DANIELS, a/k/a Tee, a/k/a Heck, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 332
Pages: 22–22

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Terrence Arnez DANIELS, a/k/a Tee, a/k/a Heck, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-6634.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 26, 2009.
Decided: Sept. 2, 2009.
Terrence Arnez Daniels, Appellant Pro Se. Stacey Denise Haynes, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Terrence Arnez Daniels appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion to reduce his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Daniels, No. 5:01-cr-00736-CMC-2 (D.S.C. Apr. 1, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.