Case Name: LAUDERDALE BY-THE-SEA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a Florida corporation, M. I. Anglin and S. A. Anglin, v. FRANK T. HUMISTON and CARRIE W. HUMISTON, his wife
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1942-11-17
Citations: 151 Fla. 856
Docket Number: 
Parties: LAUDERDALE BY-THE-SEA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a Florida corporation, M. I. Anglin and S. A. Anglin, v. FRANK T. HUMISTON and CARRIE W. HUMISTON, his wife.
Judges: BROWN, C. J., WHITFIELD, BUFORD and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 151
Pages: 856–856

Head Matter:
LAUDERDALE BY-THE-SEA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a Florida corporation, M. I. Anglin and S. A. Anglin, v. FRANK T. HUMISTON and CARRIE W. HUMISTON, his wife.
10 So. (2nd) 486
Division B
November 17, 1942
Rehearing Denied December 7, 1942
Roach & Hoyl, for appellants.
Baxter & Berryhill, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
This case grows out of a mill run real estate transaction wherein appellants sold appellees lots one, two and three, Blocks Nine of Lauderdale by the Sea, a subdivision in Broward County. It was instituted as a suit for injunction but wound up as one to require performance of the contract to sell. The ultimate questions turned on the interpretation of the evidence in support of a complicated set of facts. The chancellor found for the complainants and his finding finds ample support in the record. A detailed discussion of the questions raised would require a lengthy opinion that would serve no useful purpose.
The judgment appealed from was fair and equitable and is affirmed.
Affirmed.
BROWN, C. J., WHITFIELD, BUFORD and ADAMS, JJ., concur.