Case Name: In the Matter of the Claim of Tawana M. Kendricks, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2003-11-06
Citations: 1 A.D.2d 682
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Claim of Tawana M. Kendricks, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 1
Pages: 682–683

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Claim of Tawana M. Kendricks, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
[766 NYS2d 623]

Opinion:
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 27, 2002, which denied claimant's application to reopen its prior decision.
Claimant appeals from the denial of her application to reopen and reconsider a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board dated December 5, 2001 ruling that she was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits. Whether to grant an application to reopen a decision is within the discre tion of the Board and, absent a showing that the Board abused its discretion, its decision will not be disturbed (see Matter of Jackson [Commissioner of Labor], 306 AD2d 604 [2003]). Here, in support of her application to reopen, claimant offered no new evidence which was not before the Board on her initial application to reopen. Furthermore, the record belies her assertion that she was denied the right to cross-examine the employer's witness. Finally, claimant's attempts to argue the merits of the underlying determination denying her application for unemployment insurance benefits are not properly before this Court inasmuch as claimant failed to perfect her appeal therefrom.
Spain, J.P., Mugglin, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.