Case Name: Napoleon O'NEAL, Appellant, v. Rufus Bryan STEWART and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1973-02-26
Citations: 273 So. 2d 423
Docket Number: No. 72-592
Parties: Napoleon O’NEAL, Appellant, v. Rufus Bryan STEWART and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Appellees.
Judges: REED, C. J., and WALDEN and CROSS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 273
Pages: 423–424

Head Matter:
Napoleon O’NEAL, Appellant, v. Rufus Bryan STEWART and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Appellees.
No. 72-592.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb. 26, 1973.
Howard Warren, Cocoa Beach, for appellant.
James O. Driscoll, of Driscoll, Conrad & Langston, Orlando, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The sole issue in this case is whether the trial court abused its discretion when it denied plaintiff's motion to vacate a summary judgment in favor of defendants. The motion was founded on Rule 1.540(b), RCP 31 F.S.A. We have carefully reviewed the motion and the procedural history leading up to its denial. Based thereon and on the briefs and oral argument, we hold that an abuse of discretion by the trial court has not been made to appear. The order under review is, therefore, affirmed. See Farish v. Lum's Inc., Fla.1972, 267 So.2d 325.
REED, C. J., and WALDEN and CROSS, JJ., concur.