Case Name: Susan WICKLUND, M.D.; James H. Armstrong, M.D.; Lindsay Richards, M.D.; Susan Cahill, P.A.; Douglas Webber, M.D.; Beth E. Thompson, M.D.; Mary Stranahan, D.O.; and Mark Miles, M.D., on behalf of themselves and their patients throughout Montana and surrounding states and Canada, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Martin D. LAMBERT, in his official capacity as Gallatin County Attorney, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1997-05-02
Citations: 112 F.3d 1040
Docket Number: No. 95-36028
Parties: Susan WICKLUND, M.D.; James H. Armstrong, M.D.; Lindsay Richards, M.D.; Susan Cahill, P.A.; Douglas Webber, M.D.; Beth E. Thompson, M.D.; Mary Stranahan, D.O.; and Mark Miles, M.D., on behalf of themselves and their patients throughout Montana and surrounding states and Canada, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Martin D. LAMBERT, in his official capacity as Gallatin County Attorney, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before THOMAS M. REAVLEY, REINHARDT, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 112
Pages: 1040–1040

Head Matter:
Susan WICKLUND, M.D.; James H. Armstrong, M.D.; Lindsay Richards, M.D.; Susan Cahill, P.A.; Douglas Webber, M.D.; Beth E. Thompson, M.D.; Mary Stranahan, D.O.; and Mark Miles, M.D., on behalf of themselves and their patients throughout Montana and surrounding states and Canada, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Martin D. LAMBERT, in his official capacity as Gallatin County Attorney, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 95-36028.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 2, 1997.
Before THOMAS M. REAVLEY, REINHARDT, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c), Martin D. Lambert is substituted as defendant-appellant in place of his predecessor in office, Michael Salvagni.
The Honorable Thomas M. Reavley, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Fifth Circuit, Sitting by designation.

Opinion:
This case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings in light of Lambert v. Wicklund, — U.S.-, 117 S.Ct. 1169, — L.Ed.2d-(1997). The district court shall consider in particular those contentions raised by plaintiffs that were not addressed by the Supreme Court.