Case Name: Billy H. CRUDUP, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2016-05-31
Citations: 490 S.W.3d 791
Docket Number: No. ED 103106
Parties: Billy H. CRUDUP, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 490
Pages: 791–791

Head Matter:
Billy H. CRUDUP, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 103106
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Filed: May 31, 2016
FOR APPELLANT Amy E. Lowe, Assistant Public Defender, 1010 Market St., Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.
FOR RESPONDENT Chris Foster, Attorney General, Richard A. Starnes, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.
Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Billy H. Crudup appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).