Case Name: Willie C. HAYES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2008-02-13
Citations: 245 S.W.3d 266
Docket Number: No. ED 89486
Parties: Willie C. HAYES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 245
Pages: 266–266

Head Matter:
Willie C. HAYES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 89486.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Feb. 13, 2008.
Edward Scott Thompson, St. Louis, MO, for Movant/Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Joshua N. Corman, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent/Respondent.
Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Willie C. Hayes appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2005, unless otherwise indicated.