Case Name: EDWIN S. DICKERSON, APPELLANT, v. WILKES-BARRE AND HAZELTON RAILROAD COMPANY, RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1926-10-18
Citations: 103 N.J.L. 175
Docket Number: 
Parties: EDWIN S. DICKERSON, APPELLANT, v. WILKES-BARRE AND HAZELTON RAILROAD COMPANY, RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 103
Pages: 175–181

Head Matter:
EDWIN S. DICKERSON, APPELLANT, v. WILKES-BARRE AND HAZELTON RAILROAD COMPANY, RESPONDENT.
Submitted May 28, 1926
Decided October 18, 1926.
For the appellant, D. Trueman Stackhouse.
For the respondent, Katzenbach & Hunt and George Gildea.

Opinion:
Pee Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Lloyd in the Supreme Court on a motion to strike out the defendant's answer.