Case Name: JOHN S. WESTERVELT'S SONS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. REGENCY, INC., DEFENDANT, JEAN G. L. CASSEL van DOORN AND ANOTHER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS AND CROSS-RESPONDENTS, WILLIAM HENIG, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1949-05-03
Citations: 3 N.J. Super. 173
Docket Number: 
Parties: JOHN S. WESTERVELT’S SONS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. REGENCY, INC., DEFENDANT, JEAN G. L. CASSEL van DOORN AND ANOTHER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS AND CROSS-RESPONDENTS, WILLIAM HENIG, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 3
Pages: 173–173

Head Matter:
JOHN S. WESTERVELT’S SONS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. REGENCY, INC., DEFENDANT, JEAN G. L. CASSEL van DOORN AND ANOTHER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS AND CROSS-RESPONDENTS, WILLIAM HENIG, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued March 7, 1949
Decided May 3, 1949.
Before Judges Jacobs, Eastwood and Bigelow.
Mr. Paul T. Huckin (Messrs. Huckin & Huckin, attorneys) argued the cause for the plaintiff-respondent and cross-appellant.
Mr. Maurice C. Brigadier (Messrs. Eichmann & Seiden, attorneys) argued the cause for the defendants-appellants.
Mr. L. Stanley Ford argued the cause for the defendant-respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment will be affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the Chancery Division by Judge Grimshaw, and reported at 63 A. 2d 818.