Case Name: Forest Hills Gardens Corporation, Respondent, v. Herman Kamp, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1997-03-04
Citations: 171 Misc. 2d 334
Docket Number: 
Parties: Forest Hills Gardens Corporation, Respondent, v Herman Kamp, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 171
Pages: 334–334

Head Matter:
[659 NYS2d 690]
Forest Hills Gardens Corporation, Respondent, v Herman Kamp, Appellant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
March 4, 1997
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Herman Kamp, appellant pro se. Ribakove & Ramirez, Forest Hills (Ronald W. Ramirez and Ben Feder of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Orders unanimously affirmed without costs.
Under the circumstances presented, the lower court did not abuse its discretion in denying oral argument and limiting disclosure. We find defendant's other contentions raised on appeal to be without merit.
Kassoff, P. J., Chetta and Patterson, JJ., concur.