Case Name: Urbano TORRES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1986-03-18
Citations: 485 So. 2d 469
Docket Number: No. 84-793
Parties: Urbano TORRES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUB-BART and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 485
Pages: 469–469

Head Matter:
Urbano TORRES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 84-793.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 18, 1986.
Rehearing Denied April 14, 1986.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Elliot H. Scherker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Richard E. Doran, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUB-BART and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The order denying the defendant's motion for post-conviction relief is reversed upon a holding that the evidence before the trial court indisputably failed to establish that the defendant's entry of a guilty plea to the charges against him was knowingly and voluntarily made with an understanding of the consequences. See Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969); Williams v. State, 316 So.2d 267 (Fla.1975).
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.