Case Name: SOUTH BROWARD HOSPITAL DISTRICT, Petitioner, Cross-Respondent, v. Ethel SCHMITT, Respondent, Cross-Petitioner
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1967-02-08
Citations: 195 So. 2d 216
Docket Number: No. 34293
Parties: SOUTH BROWARD HOSPITAL DISTRICT, Petitioner, Cross-Respondent, v. Ethel SCHMITT, Respondent, Cross-Petitioner.
Judges: THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW, CALDWELL and ERVIN,. JJ-, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 195
Pages: 216–216

Head Matter:
SOUTH BROWARD HOSPITAL DISTRICT, Petitioner, Cross-Respondent, v. Ethel SCHMITT, Respondent, Cross-Petitioner.
No. 34293.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Feb. 8, 1967.
Rehearing Denied March 9, 1967.
McCune, Hiaasen, Crum & Ferris, and James J. Linus, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner-cross-respondent.
Simons & Schlesinger, Hollywood, for "espondent-cross-petitioner.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By treating a Notice of Appeal as a Petition for Writ of Certiorari, a majority of the Court heretofore issued the writ. The cause has now been heard on oral argument and the briefs and record have beem carefully considered. It is now concluded' that the writ was improvidently issued andl should be discharged.
It is so ordered.
THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW, CALDWELL and ERVIN,. JJ-, concur.
O'CONNELL, J., dissents with Opinion..