Case Name: Cecil BRANHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1997-09-25
Citations: 699 So. 2d 809
Docket Number: No. 97-1519
Parties: Cecil BRANHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: MINER, ALLEN and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 699
Pages: 809–809

Head Matter:
Cecil BRANHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 97-1519.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Sept. 25, 1997.
Appellant, pro se.
Robert Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellant challenges an order by which his motion to correct an illegal sentence, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), was denied. We affirm because appellant did not raise a claim cognizable under 3.800(a). King v. State, 681 So.2d 1136 (Fla.1996); Davis v. State, 661 So.2d 1193 (Fla.1995); State v. Callaway, 658 So.2d 983 (Fla.1995); Baldwin v. State, 679 So.2d 1193 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).
MINER, ALLEN and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.