Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gerald SALLEY, a/k/a Arthur Jackson, a/k/a G, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-05-28
Citations: 325 F. App'x 247
Docket Number: No. 09-6089
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Gerald SALLEY, a/k/a Arthur Jackson, a/k/a G, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 325
Pages: 247–247

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Gerald SALLEY, a/k/a Arthur Jackson, a/k/a G, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 09-6089.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 21, 2009.
Decided: May 28, 2009.
Gerald Salley, Appellant Pro Se. Sean Kittrell, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Gerald Salley appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Salley, No. 3:95-cr-00488-JFA-3 (D.S.C. Jan. 5 & Jan. 30, 2009); see United States v. Dun-phy, 551 F.3d 247 (2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.