Case Name: James Artis JOHNSON, Plaintiff- Appellant, v. Jeffrey J. CRUDEN; Rudy E. Renfer, Defendants - Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-04-27
Citations: 323 F. App'x 266
Docket Number: No. 09-6003
Parties: James Artis JOHNSON, Plaintiff— Appellant, v. Jeffrey J. CRUDEN; Rudy E. Renfer, Defendants — Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 323
Pages: 266–267

Head Matter:
James Artis JOHNSON, Plaintiff— Appellant, v. Jeffrey J. CRUDEN; Rudy E. Renfer, Defendants — Appellees.
No. 09-6003.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 16, 2009.
Decided: April 27, 2009.
James Artis Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James Artis Johnson appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Cruden, No. 5:08-ct-03082-BO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 17, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.