Case Name: U.S. SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL GROUP, INC., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2011-11-02
Citations: 75 So. 3d 333
Docket Number: No. 3D10-2881
Parties: U.S. SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL GROUP, INC., Appellee.
Judges: Before SHEPHERD and EMAS, JJ. and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 75
Pages: 333–333

Head Matter:
U.S. SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL GROUP, INC., Appellee.
No. 3D10-2881.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 2, 2011.
Rehearing Denied Dec. 22, 2011.
David B. Pakula, Pembroke Pines, for appellant.
Marlene S. Reiss, Miami, for appellee.
Before SHEPHERD and EMAS, JJ. and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
EMAS, J.
This case comes to us for review of an order by the county court granting summary judgment in favor of Professional Medical Group, Inc. In its order, the trial judge certified to this Court the following question as one of great public importance:
May the statutory amendment that went into effect on January 1, 2008, providing that an insurer may limit reimbursement of no fault benefits to 80% of 200% of the applicable Medicare Part B fee schedule, be constitutionally applied retroactively to a policy with effective dates of December 7, 2007 through June 7, 2008, where the accident and medical treatment occurred after January 1, 2008 and the insurer did not issue an endorsement advising the insured that the fee schedule would be applied?
This Court initially accepted jurisdiction of this cause pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.160.
Having reviewed the briefs, and following oral argument, this Court declines to answer the question certified by the lower court to be one of great public importance, and therefore transfers this appeal, together with the filing fee, to the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida, appellate division, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.160(f)(2).
. See Barnett v. Fla. Dep't of Mgmt. Servs., 953 So.2d 461 (Fla.2007) (declining review where the circumstances of the case were fact-specific).