Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenneth O. LANGLEY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-06-26
Citations: 328 F. App'x 265
Docket Number: No. 08-7908
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenneth O. LANGLEY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 328
Pages: 265–265

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenneth O. LANGLEY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-7908.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 22, 2009.
Decided: June 26, 2009.
. Keith Alan Williams, Keith A. Williams, PA, Greenville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Anne Margaret Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kenneth O. Langley appeals the district court's order granting Langley's 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Langley, No. 4:04-cr-00073-FL-1 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 8, 2008). We deny Langley's motion to expedite. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.