Case Name: Janeane R. CORRELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2018-12-26
Citations: 564 S.W.3d 401
Docket Number: No. ED 106441
Parties: Janeane R. CORRELL, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 564
Pages: 401–402

Head Matter:
Janeane R. CORRELL, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 106441
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Filed: December 26, 2018
FOR APPELLANTS: Edwards S. Thompson, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101.
FOR RESPONDENTS: Shaun J. Mackelprang, Joshua Hawley, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.
Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Janeane Correll appeals the denial without an evidentiary hearing of her Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Correll claims that the motion court clearly erred because her conviction of the felony of stealing and sentence of six years' imprisonment were unlawful under the Missouri Supreme Court's decision in State v. Bazell , 497 S.W.3d 263 (Mo.banc 2016). We affirm.
The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
All rules references are to the Missouri Supreme Court Rules (2017).