Case Name: In the Matter of David Lieberman, Respondent, v. City of New York, Department of Housing Preservation and Development, Office of Rent and Housing Maintenance, Rent Control Division, Respondent, and Maryland Leasing Co., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1986-05-27
Citations: 120 A.D.2d 730
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of David Lieberman, Respondent, v City of New York, Department of Housing Preservation and Development, Office of Rent and Housing Maintenance, Rent Control Division, Respondent, and Maryland Leasing Co., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 120
Pages: 730–731

Head Matter:
In the Matter of David Lieberman, Respondent, v City of New York, Department of Housing Preservation and Development, Office of Rent and Housing Maintenance, Rent Control Division, Respondent, and Maryland Leasing Co., Appellant.

Opinion:
— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent-respondent, dated March 30, 1984, which held that the petitioner's apartment was not subject to the Rent Control Law and Regulations, the intervenor-respondent appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hyman, J.), dated January 3, 1985, which annulled the determination and remitted the matter to the respondent-respondent for further consideration.
Appeal dismissed, with costs.
The appellant, having defaulted in appearing in this proceeding at Special Term, has no standing to appeal from the judgment of Special Term. Lazer, J. P., Gibbons, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.