Case Name: Vito A. Dondiego, Doing Business as Dondiego Flour Co., Appellant, v. August Cognetta et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1959-12-18
Citations: 21 Misc. 2d 254
Docket Number: 
Parties: Vito A. Dondiego, Doing Business as Dondiego Flour Co., Appellant, v. August Cognetta et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 21
Pages: 254–255

Head Matter:
Vito A. Dondiego, Doing Business as Dondiego Flour Co., Appellant, v. August Cognetta et al., Respondents.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
December 18, 1959.
Vito A. Dondiego, appellant in person, and Rubin Huffman for appellant.
No one appearing for respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment should be unanimously reversed upon the law and facts and a new trial granted, with $30 costs to plaintiff to abide the event. The judgment was against the weight of the credible evidence.
Appeal from the order should be dismissed. By proceeding to trial after denial of his motion for summary judgment, the plaintiff waived any right to summary judgment. (Corr v. Boggiano, 244 App. Div. 724.)
Concur — Pette, Di Giovanna and Brown, JJ.
Judgment reversed, etc.