Case Name: In re: Elizabeth PAWLAK. George E. McDermott, Movan-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-01-15
Citations: 85 F. App'x 890
Docket Number: No. 03-1653
Parties: In re: Elizabeth PAWLAK. George E. McDermott, Movan—Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 85
Pages: 890–890

Head Matter:
In re: Elizabeth PAWLAK. George E. McDermott, Movan—Appellant.
No. 03-1653.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 26, 2003.
Decided Jan. 15, 2004.
George E. McDermott, Appellant pro se.
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
George E. McDermott appeals from the district court's orders denying his motion to intervene in this action and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See In re Pawlak, No. MISC-03-41-L (D.Md. filed Apr. 22, 2003; entered Apr. 23, 2003 & filed May 19, 2003; entered May 20, 2003). We deny McDermott's motions to amend the record on appeal, to supplement the record, to reinstate the formal briefing schedule, and to correct the record to reflect that the case is on a formal briefing schedule. Additionally, because Elizabeth Pawlak is not a party to this appeal, we deny her motions for a briefing schedule and for extensions of time to file a brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED