Case Name: Paul HARPER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard W. WIEKING, Clerk, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-09-25
Citations: 202 F. App'x 274
Docket Number: No. 05-17279
Parties: Paul HARPER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard W. WIEKING, Clerk, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before: O’SCANNLAIN, GRABER and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 202
Pages: 274–275

Head Matter:
Paul HARPER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard W. WIEKING, Clerk, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 05-17279.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 18, 2006.
Filed Sept. 25, 2006.
Paul Harper, Long Beach, CA, pro se.
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, GRABER and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
We have reviewed appellant's response to this court's order to show cause, and we conclude that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.