Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edgar MARTINEZ-CASTILLO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-06-16
Citations: 185 F. App'x 628
Docket Number: No. 05-30535
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Edgar MARTINEZ-CASTILLO, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: KLEINFELD, PAEZ, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 185
Pages: 628–628

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Edgar MARTINEZ-CASTILLO, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 05-30535.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 12, 2006.
Decided June 16, 2006.
Kent S. Robinson, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Portland, OR, for Plaintiff — Appellee.
Lisa Hay, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Portland, OR, for Defendant — Appellant.
Before: KLEINFELD, PAEZ, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Edgar Martinez-Castillo appeals his 37-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to being found in the United States after illegal re-entry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Martinez-Castillo contends that the district court violated his constitutional rights by imposing a sentence in excess of the two-year maximum set forth in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) based on a prior conviction that was neither proved to a jury nor admitted during the plea colloquy. This contention is foreclosed by United States v. Weiland, 420 F.3d 1062, 1079 & n. 16 (9th Cir.2005), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 1911, — L.Ed.2d-(2006).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.