Case Name: Erik T. SANFILLIPPO, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-03-16
Citations: 129 S.W.3d 448
Docket Number: No. ED 83374
Parties: Erik T. SANFILLIPPO, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J. and MARY R. RUSSELL, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 129
Pages: 448–448

Head Matter:
Erik T. SANFILLIPPO, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 83374.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
March 16, 2004.
Gwenda R. Robinson, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Leslie E. McNamara, Assistant Attorney
General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J. and MARY R. RUSSELL, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Erik Sanfillippo ("Movant"), appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Francois County denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Following a jury trial, Movant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance, section 195.202 RSMo 2002, creation of controlled substance, section 195.420, and possession of ephedrine with intent to manufacture methamphetamine, section 195.246. Movant was sentenced to twenty years on each of the first two counts and ten years on the third count, all counts to run consecutively. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.
. All rule references are to Missouri Supreme Court Rules 2002, unless otherwise indicated.
. All statutory references are to RSMo 2002 unless otherwise indicated.