Case Name: Maggie SMITH, Claimant/Respondent, v. ARTHUR'S FASHIONS, INC., Employer/Appellant, and American Motor Insurance Co., Insurer
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1993-12-21
Citations: 873 S.W.2d 245
Docket Number: No. 64058
Parties: Maggie SMITH, Claimant/Respondent, v. ARTHUR’S FASHIONS, INC., Employer/Appellant, and American Motor Insurance Co., Insurer.
Judges: Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 873
Pages: 245–246

Head Matter:
Maggie SMITH, Claimant/Respondent, v. ARTHUR’S FASHIONS, INC., Employer/Appellant, and American Motor Insurance Co., Insurer.
No. 64058.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Dec. 21, 1993.
William R. Gallagher, Private Atty., St. Louis, for employer/appellant.
Jack Russell Itzkowitz, Private Atty., St. Louis, for claimanVrespondent.
Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Employer appeals from a final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission), awarding claimant $18,-464.83 in disability and medical expenses. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are supported by substantial and competent evidence and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).