Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Odell ANDREWS and Willie Sloan, Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1971-04-13
Citations: 439 F.2d 155
Docket Number: No. 26567
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Odell ANDREWS and Willie Sloan, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 439
Pages: 155–155

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Odell ANDREWS and Willie Sloan, Appellants.
No. 26567.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
April 13, 1971.
Burton Marks, of Marks, Sherman & London, Beverly Hills, Cal., for appellant.
Robert L. Meyer, U. S. Atty., David R. Nissen, Chief, Crim. Div., Brain J. O’Neill, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS, HUFSTEDLER and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of conviction after remand, 426 F.2d 1304, of this judge-tried case is affirmed.-
We hold it was not necessary to have a whole new trial or to let defendant have a second chance with a jury instead of a judge.
A close parallel is found in the case of Campbell v. United States, 365 U.S. 85, 81 S.Ct. 421, 5 L.Ed.2d 428.