Case Name: James Alexander HARLOW, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1980-07-09
Citations: 385 So. 2d 734
Docket Number: No. 79-2314
Parties: James Alexander HARLOW, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: HOBSON, Acting C. J., and OTT and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 385
Pages: 734–735

Head Matter:
James Alexander HARLOW, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 79-2314.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
July 9, 1980.
Jack 0. Johnson, Public Defender, Bar-tow, and Samuel Robert Mandelbaum, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Peggy A. Quince, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Hearsay testimony was all that supported the violation of the monthly support condition. Also, there was no specific finding that appellant's financial condition would allow him to pay the supervisory fee condition. Jones v. State, 360 So.2d 1158 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). Therefore, we remand for the deletion of both those violated conditions on the order of revocation of probation. In all other respects, we affirm.
HOBSON, Acting C. J., and OTT and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.