Case Name: In the Interest of: J.H.E., J.L.E. and C.R.E., J.H.E. and C.A.E., Appellants, v. MISSOURI CHILDREN'S DIVISION, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2010-05-25
Citations: 310 S.W.3d 316
Docket Number: Nos. WD 71577, WD 71578, WD 71579
Parties: In the Interest of: J.H.E., J.L.E. and C.R.E., J.H.E. and C.A.E., Appellants, v. MISSOURI CHILDREN’S DIVISION, Respondent.
Judges: Before THOMAS H. NEWTON, C.J., JAMES EDWARD WELSH, and GARY D. WITT, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 310
Pages: 316–316

Head Matter:
In the Interest of: J.H.E., J.L.E. and C.R.E., J.H.E. and C.A.E., Appellants, v. MISSOURI CHILDREN’S DIVISION, Respondent.
Nos. WD 71577, WD 71578, WD 71579.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
May 25, 2010.
Frederick P. Tucker, Macon, MO, for Appellants.
William P. Devoy, Brookfield, MO, for Plaintiffs.
Gary L. Gardner, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before THOMAS H. NEWTON, C.J., JAMES EDWARD WELSH, and GARY D. WITT, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
J.H.E. and C.A.E. appeal the juvenile court's judgment terminating their parental rights to J.H.E., J.L.E., and C.R.E. They contest the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the court's findings.
For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).