Case Name: LOUISE P. HARING ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. CHARLES W. BANKS, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1930-05-19
Citations: 106 N.J.L. 569
Docket Number: 
Parties: LOUISE P. HARING ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. CHARLES W. BANKS, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 106
Pages: 569–569

Head Matter:
LOUISE P. HARING ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. CHARLES W. BANKS, APPELLANT.
Argued October 22, 1929
Decided May 19, 1930.
For the respondents, Coult, Satz & Tomlinson.
For the appellant, William P. Braun.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellob, Tbenchaed, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Yah Buskiek, McGlehhoh, Kays, Heteield, Deae, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.