Case Name: JOHN D'ATRI and LIVIA D'ATRI, Appellants, v. ROBERT VIGNALATS, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada
Jurisdiction: Nevada
Decision Date: 1976-12-30
Citations: 92 Nev. 748
Docket Number: No. 8938
Parties: JOHN D’ATRI and LIVIA D’ATRI, Appellants, v. ROBERT VIGNALATS, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Nevada Reports
Volume: 92
Pages: 748–748

Head Matter:
JOHN D’ATRI and LIVIA D’ATRI, Appellants, v. ROBERT VIGNALATS, Respondent.
No. 8938
December 30, 1976
557 P.2d 272
[Rehearing denied January 27, 1977]
Ralph M. Crow, Carson City, for Appellants.
A. J. Bayer, Jr., Carson City, for Respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION
Per Curiam:
Although appellants contend the district court erred in granting respondent's motion for summary judgment, they have faded to demonstrate error, as contemplated by our rules, through briefs citing pertinent portions of the record and relevant authority. Accordingly, we will not consider their contentions. Holland Livestock v. B & C Enterprises, 92 Nev. 473, 553 P.2d 950 (1976).
Affirmed.