Case Name: The State, ex rel. Heine, Appellant, v. Busher, Chief Justice, Cleveland Municipal Court, Appellee
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1956-02-15
Citations: 164 Ohio St. 519
Docket Number: No. 34501
Parties: The State, ex rel. Heine, Appellant, v. Busher, Chief Justice, Cleveland Municipal Court, Appellee.
Judges: Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Stewart, Bell and Taet, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, New Service
Volume: 164
Pages: 519–520

Head Matter:
The State, ex rel. Heine, Appellant, v. Busher, Chief Justice, Cleveland Municipal Court, Appellee.
(No. 34501
Decided February 15, 1956.)
Mr. R. A. Kennedy and Mr. A. W. Thomas, for appellant.
Mr. Ralph S. Locher, director of law, Mr. Joseph H. Crowley and Mr. William T. McKnight, for appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The writ of prohibition will be awarded only where there is no adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law and will not be awarded as a substitute for an appeal. State, ex rel. Rhodes, Aud., v. Solether, Judge, 162 Ohio St., 559, 124 N. E. (2d), 411; State, ex rel. Winnefeld, v. Court of Common Pleas, 159 Ohio St., 225, 112 N. E. (2d), 27.
Appellant has an adequate remedy by way of appeal.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Stewart, Bell and Taet, JJ., concur.