Case Name: New Paltz, Highland and Poughkeepsie Traction Company, Appellant, v. Central New England Railway Company and O'Brien Construction Company, Respondents. In the Matter of the Application of the Central New England Railway Company for the Elimination of the Following Grade Crossings in the Town of Lloyd, Ulster County: (1) The North Road to Black Lake; (2) the New Paltz Turnpike, also Known as the Whittley Crossing, and (3) for Determining the Manner in Which the Proposed New Crossing at Brooks Crossing Shall Be Constructed
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1914-05
Citations: 163 A.D. 928
Docket Number: 
Parties: New Paltz, Highland and Poughkeepsie Traction Company, Appellant, v. Central New England Railway Company and O’Brien Construction Company, Respondents. In the Matter of the Application of the Central New England Railway Company for the Elimination of the Following Grade Crossings in the Town of Lloyd, Ulster County: (1) The North Road to Black Lake; (2) the New Paltz Turnpike, also Known as the Whittley Crossing, and (3) for Determining the Manner in Which the Proposed New Crossing at Brooks Crossing Shall Be Constructed.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 163
Pages: 928–929

Head Matter:
New Paltz, Highland and Poughkeepsie Traction Company, Appellant, v. Central New England Railway Company and O’Brien Construction Company, Respondents. In the Matter of the Application of the Central New England Railway Company for the Elimination of the Following Grade Crossings in the Town of Lloyd, Ulster County: (1) The North Road to Black Lake; (2) the New Paltz Turnpike, also Known as the Whittley Crossing, and (3) for Determining the Manner in Which the Proposed New Crossing at Brooks Crossing Shall Be Constructed.

Opinion:
Order that the injunction granted by Justice Chester, pending the order to show cause before the Appellate Division, be continued until the action is tried and determined before Justice Chester; if the trial is delayed by the plain tiff, the justice may modify or vacate the injunction. The justice may at any time, for any sufficient reason appearing to him, vacate or modify the stay before the conclusion of the trial. Smith, P. J., and Woodward, J., dissented.