Case Name: GRACE J. KINSEY, RESPONDENT, v. HUDSON AND MANHATTAN RAILROAD CO., APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1944-01-27
Citations: 131 N.J.L. 161
Docket Number: 
Parties: GRACE J. KINSEY, RESPONDENT, v. HUDSON AND MANHATTAN RAILROAD CO., APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 131
Pages: 161–162

Head Matter:
GRACE J. KINSEY, RESPONDENT, v. HUDSON AND MANHATTAN RAILROAD CO., APPELLANT.
Submitted October 29, 1943
Decided January 27, 1944.
For the respondent, Max A. Sturm.
For the appellant, Collins & Corbin.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Case, Donges, Porter, Colie, Dear, Wells, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, Dill, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.