Case Name: Beverly Murnan et al., Respondents, v. Town of Tonawanda, Defendant, and Kathleen S. Konitsch, as Administrator of the Estate of Helen L. Peters, Deceased, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2006-11-17
Citations: 34 A.D.3d 1296
Docket Number: 
Parties: Beverly Murnan et al., Respondents, v Town of Tonawanda, Defendant, and Kathleen S. Konitsch, as Administrator of the Estate of Helen L. Peters, Deceased, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 34
Pages: 1296–1297

Head Matter:
Beverly Murnan et al., Respondents, v Town of Tonawanda, Defendant, and Kathleen S. Konitsch, as Administrator of the Estate of Helen L. Peters, Deceased, Appellant.
[824 NYS2d 551]

Opinion:
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Frederick J. Marshall, J.), entered September 6, 2005 in a personal injury action. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied that part of the cross motion of defendant Kathleen S. Konitsch, as administrator of the estate of Helen L. Peters, deceased, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and cross claims against her on the ground that decedent was not negligent.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this action alleging that plaintiff Beverly Murnan was injured after tripping and falling on a crack in a sidewalk that was used as part of the driveway of Helen L. Peters (decedent). Supreme Court properly denied that part of the cross motion of Kathleen S. Konitsch (defendant), the administrator of decedent's estate, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims against her on the ground that decedent was not negligent. In support of that part of her cross motion, defendant failed to meet her burden of establishing that decedent, the abutting landowner, "did nothing to either create the [allegedly] defective condition or cause the condition through the special use of [that part of the public sidewalk] as a driveway" (Adorno v Carty, 23 AD3d 590, 591 [2005] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Katz v City of New York, 18 AD3d 818, 819 [2005]; cf. Torres v City of New York, 32 AD 3d 347). Present—Hurlbutt, A.P.J., Kehoe, Smith and Green, JJ.