Case Name: ASPEX EYEWEAR, INC., Manhattan Design Studio, Inc., Contour Optik, Inc., and Asahi Optical Co., Ltd., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MIRACLE OPTICS, INC., Defendant-Appellee; Aspex Eyewear, Inc., Manhattan Design Studio, Inc., Contour Optik, Inc., and Asahi Optical Co., Ltd., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Miracle Optics, Inc., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-04-20
Citations: 96 F. App'x 707
Docket Number: Nos. 04-1138, 04-1182
Parties: ASPEX EYEWEAR, INC., Manhattan Design Studio, Inc., Contour Optik, Inc., and Asahi Optical Co., Ltd., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MIRACLE OPTICS, INC., Defendant-Appellee. Aspex Eyewear, Inc., Manhattan Design Studio, Inc., Contour Optik, Inc., and Asahi Optical Co., Ltd., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Miracle Optics, Inc., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 96
Pages: 707–708

Head Matter:
ASPEX EYEWEAR, INC., Manhattan Design Studio, Inc., Contour Optik, Inc., and Asahi Optical Co., Ltd., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MIRACLE OPTICS, INC., Defendant-Appellee. Aspex Eyewear, Inc., Manhattan Design Studio, Inc., Contour Optik, Inc., and Asahi Optical Co., Ltd., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Miracle Optics, Inc., Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 04-1138, 04-1182.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
DECIDED: April 20, 2004.
Michael A. Nicodema, Principal Attorney, Barry J. Schindler, of Counsel, Green-berg Traurig, New York, NY, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
Jeffrey A. Schwab, Principal Attorney, Michael Aschen, of Counsel, Abelman, Frayne, New York, NY, David B. Abel, Mark N. Hurvitz, of Counsel, Squire, Sanders, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Cross Appellant.

Opinion:
SCHALL, Circuit Judge.
ORDER
Miracle Optics, Inc. responds to this court's March 10, 2004 order regarding its cross-appeal and moves for an extension of time, until June 4, 2004, to file its brief in 04-1138.
In response to this court's order regarding its cross-appeal, Miracle Optics moves to withdraw its cross-appeal.
Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) Miracle Optics' cross-appeal, 04-1182, is dismissed. Each side shall bear its own costs with regard to 04-1182.
(2) Miracle Optics' motion for an extension of time is granted.