Case Name: Daniel K. MAYERS et al., Appellants v. Peter S. RIDLEY et al.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1972-06-30
Citations: 465 F.2d 630
Docket Number: No. 71-1418
Parties: Daniel K. MAYERS et al., Appellants v. Peter S. RIDLEY et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 465
Pages: 630–661

Head Matter:
Daniel K. MAYERS et al., Appellants v. Peter S. RIDLEY et al.
No. 71-1418.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Reconsidered March 1, 1972.
Decided June 30, 1972.
Mr. Michael J. Waggoner, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Jack B. Owens and Ralph J. Temple, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellants.
Mr. Ted. D. Kuemmerling, Asst. Corp. Counsel for the District of Columbia, with whom Messrs. C. Francis Murphy, Corp. Counsel, and Richard W. Barton, Asst. Corp. Counsel, were on the brief, for appellees.
On Reconsideration En Banc
Before BAZELON, Chief Judge, WILBUR K. MILLER, Senior Circuit Judge, and WRIGHT, McGOWAN, TAMM, LEVENTHAL, ROBINSON, MacKIN-NON, ROBB and WILKEY, Circuit Judges, en banc.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appellants, a group of District of Columbia residents representing the class of homeowners whose property is burdened by racial covenants, instituted this suit to enjoin the Recorder of Deeds from accepting such covenants for filing in the future and to require the Recorder to affix a sticker on each existing liber volume stating that restrictive covenants found therein are null and void. They also asked for an injunction preventing the Recorder from providing copies of instruments on file unless a similar notice is attached to the copies. The District Court dismissed their complaint, 330 F.Supp. 447 (1971), and a three-judge panel of this court affirmed that judgment. On reconsideration en banc of the judgment of the District Court we now reverse.
Reversed and remanded.