Case Name: In the Matter of the Claim of Barbara A. Mansfield, Respondent, v. General Adjustment Bureau et al., Appellants. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1967-11-02
Citations: 20 N.Y.2d 881
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Claim of Barbara A. Mansfield, Respondent, v. General Adjustment Bureau et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 20
Pages: 881–882

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Claim of Barbara A. Mansfield, Respondent, v. General Adjustment Bureau et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.
Argued October 25, 1967;
decided November 2, 1967.
Kenneth K. Floyd and Philip J. Caputo for appellants.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Henriette Frieder, Ruth Kessler Toch and Daniel Polansky of counsel), for Workmen’s Compensation Board, respondent.

Opinion:
Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Workmen's Compensation Board. (See, e.g., Matter of Gravest v. Tide Water Oil Sales Co., 275 N. T. 583, affg. 249 App. Div. 911; Matter of Lowery v. Riss & Co., 10 A D 2d 489, mot. for lv. to, opp. dem 8 N Y 2d 707.)
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burice, Bergan, Keating and Breitel. Judge Van Voorhis dissents and votes to reverse and to dismiss the claim in the following memorandum in which Judge Scileppi concurs.