Case Name: DIEUTAMY EXILUS ACQUISSA, Appellant, v. Venila JOHNSON, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2007-05-30
Citations: 958 So. 2d 513
Docket Number: No. 3D06-2924
Parties: DIEUTAMY EXILUS ACQUISSA, Appellant, v. Venila JOHNSON, Appellee.
Judges: Before GREEN, RAMIREZ, and ROTHENBERG, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 958
Pages: 513–513

Head Matter:
DIEUTAMY EXILUS ACQUISSA, Appellant, v. Venila JOHNSON, Appellee.
No. 3D06-2924.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 30, 2007.
Catherine L. Roselli, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
Francis R. Gil, Miami, for appellee.
Before GREEN, RAMIREZ, and ROTHENBERG, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Broadfoot v. Broadfoot, 791 So.2d 584, 585 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)(affirming where there was no indication that the need for statutory findings was called to the attention of the trial court); Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979) (stating that without a transcript, the record is inadequate to demonstrate reversible error).