Case Name: Derrick Vincent REDD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Millard SAILOR, Correctional Officer; Roberto Bryan, Correctional Officer, Defendants-Appellees, and Jane Doe, Nurse, Alexandria Detention Center; Kathleen Robertson, R.N., Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-06-06
Citations: 37 F. App'x 76
Docket Number: No. 02-6392
Parties: Derrick Vincent REDD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Millard SAILOR, Correctional Officer; Roberto Bryan, Correctional Officer, Defendants-Appellees, and Jane Doe, Nurse, Alexandria Detention Center; Kathleen Robertson, R.N., Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 37
Pages: 76–77

Head Matter:
Derrick Vincent REDD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Millard SAILOR, Correctional Officer; Roberto Bryan, Correctional Officer, Defendants-Appellees, and Jane Doe, Nurse, Alexandria Detention Center; Kathleen Robertson, R.N., Defendants.
No. 02-6392.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 30, 2002.
Decided June 6, 2002.
Derrick Vincent Redd, Appellant Pro Se. Jack L. Gould, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Derrick Redd appeals the magistrate judge's order granting summary judgment to prison officials and dismissing his civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's memo randum opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Redd v. Sailor, No. CA-00-442-AM (E.D. Va. filed Feb, 13, 2002; entered Feb. 14, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
This case was decided by a magistrate judge exercising jurisdiction upon consent of the parties. 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994).