Case Name: WATSON v. DURYEA
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1909-06-04
Citations: 117 N.Y.S. 348
Docket Number: 
Parties: WATSON v. DURYEA.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 117
Pages: 348–349

Head Matter:
WATSON v. DURYEA.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
June 4, 1909.)
Coubts (§ 190 )—Municipal Coubts—Review.
Under the Municipal Court act no appeal lies from an order on. demurrer.
[Ed. Note.—Eor other cases, see Courts, Dec. Dig. § 190. ]
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Brooklyn, Fourth District.
Action by Harold D. Watson against Franklin P. Duryea. From an order sustaining defendant’s demurrer to the complaint, plaintiff appeals.
Appeal dismissed.
Argued before WOODWARD, JENKS, GAYNOR, BURR, and MILLER, JJ.
Robert W. Kristeller, for appellant.
Edward A. Alexander and Jerome H. Buck, for respondent.
For other cases see same topic & § number in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep’r Indexes

Opinion:
BURR, J.
This appeal should be dismissed. . The Municipal Court act does not seem in express wprds to authorize the entry of an inter locutory judgment upon demurrer. Great Northern Moulding Co. v. Bonewur, 128 App. Div. 101, 112 N. Y. Supp. 466. In this case no interlocutory judgment was entered, as appears from the return. An appeal from the order will not lie. Fink v. Standard Bread Co. (Sup.) 110 N. Y. Supp. 205; Smith v. Ely, 46 Misc. Rep. 458, 92 N. Y. Supp. 310; Binder v. Robinson, 59 Misc. Rep. 155, 110 N. Y. Supp. 229.
The appeal must be dismissed, with costs. All concur.