Case Name: JENKINS v. MONTGOMERY WARD & CO., INC.
Court: Michigan Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Michigan
Decision Date: 1968-05-31
Citations: 11 Mich. App. 580
Docket Number: Docket No. 1,308
Parties: JENKINS v. MONTGOMERY WARD & CO., INC.
Judges: Lesinski, C. J., and Quinn and Moody, JJ., concurred.
Reporter: Michigan appeals reports; cases decided in the Michigan Court of Appeals.
Volume: 11
Pages: 580–581

Head Matter:
JENKINS v. MONTGOMERY WARD & CO., INC.
Workmen’s Compensation — Decision of Appeal Board — Discretion of Referee — Bindings of Bact.
Decision of workmen’s compensation appeal board affirming award of compensation by referee is affirmed where the record on appeal whieh presents questions dealing with findings of fact and an alleged abuse of discretion on the part of the referee, reveals no fraud or allegation of fraud, and does not support a charge of abuse of discretion (Const 1963, art 6, § 28).
Reference for Points in Headnote
58 Am Jur, Workmen’s Compensation §§ 522, 530, 532, 534.
Appeal from Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board.
Submitted Division 2 May 10, 1968, at Lansing.
(Docket No. 1,308.)
Decided May 31, 1968.
Robert T. Jenkins presented bis claim for workmen’s compensation against his employer, Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc., a foreign corporation. Award to claimant affirmed by Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board. Defendant employer appeals.
Affirmed.
Ripple, Chambers & DeWitt, for plaintiff.
Keeling, Bogue & Huthwaite, for defendant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This is an appeal from a decision of tbe workmen's compensation appeal board which affirmed tbe award of the referee. Tbe appeal presents questions dealing with findings of fact and an alleged abuse of discretion on the part of tbe referee.
Tbe record reveals no fraud or allegation thereof, nor does it support tbe charge of abuse of discretion. See Constitution 1963, art 6, § 28.
Affirmed. Costs to appellee.
Lesinski, C. J., and Quinn and Moody, JJ., concurred.