Case Name: STATE OF OREGON v. HAYNES
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1963-10-09
Citations: 235 Or. 486
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF OREGON v. HAYNES
Judges: Before McAllister, Chief Justice, and Rossman, Sloan, Goodwin and Lusk, Justices.
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 235
Pages: 486–487

Head Matter:
Argued September 6,
affirmed October 9, 1963
STATE OF OREGON v. HAYNES
385 P. 2d 622
Thomas J. Curran, Portland, argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant.
George E. Juba, Deputy District Attorney, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were George Van Hoomissen, District Attorney, Portland, and David Robinson, Jr., Chief Deputy, Criminal Department, Portland.
Before McAllister, Chief Justice, and Rossman, Sloan, Goodwin and Lusk, Justices.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Defendant moved the trial court to dismiss the indictment. He charged that he was not brought to trial within a reasonable time. The conrt refused to dismiss and defendant appeals.
The case does not warrant a recital of the proceedings in the trial court. The record presents an attempt by defendant to utilize every technicality available to him to cause delay. Defendant was brought to trial within a reasonable time, OES 134.120. The appeal is without merit.
Affirmed.