Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Ahmad ADISA, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-05-06
Citations: 105 S.W.3d 511
Docket Number: No. ED 81017
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Ahmad ADISA, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., and MARY K. HOFF and GEORGE W. DRAPER, III, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 105
Pages: 511–511

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Ahmad ADISA, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 81017.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
May 6, 2003.
S. Paige Canfield, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Nicole E. Gorovsky, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., and MARY K. HOFF and GEORGE W. DRAPER, III, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant, Ahmad Adisa, appeals from the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of first-degree murder in violation of Section 565.020, RSMo 2000, and armed criminal action in violation of Section 571.015, RSMo 2000. He claims the trial court erred in permitting the late endorsement of a witness and plainly erred in admitting hearsay testimony that resulted in improper bolstering.
Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we find no error of law. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided the parties with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).