Case Name: Jason HODGE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-06-09
Citations: 655 So. 2d 250
Docket Number: No. 94-1897
Parties: Jason HODGE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: DAUKSCH, W. SHARP and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 655
Pages: 250–250

Head Matter:
Jason HODGE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 94-1897.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
June 9, 1995.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Daisy G. Clements, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Lori E. Nelson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The state properly concedes that the guidelines scoresheet was erroneously calculated due to an error in the severity ranking of grand theft, which requires remand for correction and a new sentencing using the correctly calculated scoresheet. We also agree that conditions "H" and "L" are special conditions that would require oral pronouncement. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed but we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing.
Judgment AFFIRMED; sentence VACATED; and REMANDED.
DAUKSCH, W. SHARP and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.