Case Name: Maurice WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ms. BALLDOWN; L. Smith, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-10-06
Citations: 145 F. App'x 414
Docket Number: No. 05-6658
Parties: Maurice WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ms. BALLDOWN; L. Smith, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 145
Pages: 414–415

Head Matter:
Maurice WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ms. BALLDOWN; L. Smith, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 05-6658.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 29, 2005.
Decided Oct. 6, 2005.
Maurice White, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Maurice White appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See White v. Balldown, No. CA-05-137-3 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 7, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED