Case Name: Berry Kiel MASELLE, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-04-29
Citations: 325 F. App'x 539
Docket Number: No. 05-71089
Parties: Berry Kiel MASELLE, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 325
Pages: 539–540

Head Matter:
Berry Kiel MASELLE, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 05-71089.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 13, 2009.
Filed April 29, 2009.
Jaehoh Suh, Esquire, Law Office of Jae-hoh Suh, Van Nuys, CA, for Petitioner.
CAC-District Counsel, Esquire, Office of The District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Saul Greenstein, Esquire, Trial, OIL, Luis E. Perez, Esquire, Linda S. Wendtland, Esquire, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of The District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
Before: GRABER, GOULD, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Berry Kiel Maselle, a native and citizen of South Africa, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' order affirming an immigration judge's order of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Morales-Alegria v. Gonzales, 449 F.3d 1051, 1053 (9th Cir.2006), and we deny the petition for review.
Maselle's contention that a conviction under CaLPenal Code § 422 does not categorically constitute a crime of violence is foreclosed by Rosales-Rosales v. Ashcroft, 347 F.3d 714, 717 (9th Cir.2003).
Maselle's remaining contentions are unpersuasive.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.