Case Name: Eva M. Cohan et al., Appellants, v. Ralph Milano et al., Defendants, and Anthony Aurrichio, Inc., Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1982-02-11
Citations: 55 N.Y.2d 926
Docket Number: 
Parties: Eva M. Cohan et al., Appellants, v Ralph Milano et al., Defendants, and Anthony Aurrichio, Inc., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 55
Pages: 926–928

Head Matter:
Eva M. Cohan et al., Appellants, v Ralph Milano et al., Defendants, and Anthony Aurrichio, Inc., Respondent.
Argued January 5, 1982;
decided February 11, 1982
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Richard T. Farrell for appellants.
Nathan Cyperstein and Alvin P. Bluthman for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION of the court
Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division insofar as it was there concluded that there was no duty owed to plaintiffs by defendant-respondent, nor any breach of an asserted duty (79 AD2d 579).
Concur: Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Wachtler and Meyer. Chief Judge Cooke dissents and votes to reverse in a separate opinion in which Judge Fuchsberg concurs. Taking no part: Judge Jones.