Case Name: James S. SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-09-19
Citations: 201 S.W.3d 99
Docket Number: No. WD 66093
Parties: James S. SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before JOSEPH M. ELLIS, P.J., ROBERT G. ULRICH, and RONALD R. HOLLIGER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 201
Pages: 99–99

Head Matter:
James S. SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 66093.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Sept. 19, 2006.
Mark A. Grothoff, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before JOSEPH M. ELLIS, P.J., ROBERT G. ULRICH, and RONALD R. HOLLIGER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
James Scott appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing in Saline County Circuit Court. In his sole point on appeal he claims that the motion court erred in denying his Rule 29.15 motion because his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to file a motion to suppress and failing to object at trial to his identification as the man who robbed a grocery store. Mr. Scott's point is denied, and the judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).