Case Name: Hirsch v. The City of Cincinnati
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1915-11-09
Citations: 93 Ohio St. 479
Docket Number: No. 14882
Parties: Hirsch v. The City of Cincinnati.
Judges: Nichols, C. J., Johnson, Donahue, Wanamaker, Newman, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, New Service
Volume: 93
Pages: 479–479

Head Matter:
Hirsch v. The City of Cincinnati.
Supreme court — Dismissals—Constitutional questions not involved.
(No. 14882
Decided November 9, 1915.)
Error to the Court of Appeals of Hamilton county.
Mr. James S. Myers, for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Walter M. Schoenle, city solicitor, and Mr. Edwin S. Morrissey, municipal court prosecutor, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
The court finds that the jurisdiction of this court in this proceeding in error was based on the allegation in the petition in error that it involves questions arising under the constitution of the United States and of the state of Ohio, and the court finds that the record does not. disclose that the disposition of the case requires the consideration of any constitutional question, or that such question is involved.
It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that this cause be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Nichols, C. J., Johnson, Donahue, Wanamaker, Newman, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.