Case Name: BRANGLE v. STATE
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1923-02-25
Citations: 1 Ohio Law Abs. 298
Docket Number: No. 4415
Parties: BRANGLE v. STATE
Judges: 
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 1
Pages: 298–298

Head Matter:
No. 259
BRANGLE v. STATE
Ohio Court of Appeals, Cuyahoga County
No. 4415.
Feb. 25, 1923
ERROR — (1) Judgment of lower court affirmed.
Error to Cuyahoga Court of Common Pleas
Attorneys — H. P. Hartrath, for Brangle; E. C. Stanton, for State.

Opinion:
.PER CURIAM:.
Epitomized Opinion
Brangle was convicted of burglary and larceny in common pleas court and seeks to have the judgment reversed on the ground of prejudicial error in that court. Held by: the Court of Appeals:
1. The court believing that there is abundant' evi-udence 'to support the verdict and not finding any - prejudicial-, error, the judgment is affirmed;