Case Name: BLACKBURN AND COMPANY, INC., Petitioner v. William G. DUDLEY, III and KTM Broadcasting Company, Inc., Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jurisdiction: South Carolina
Decision Date: 1990-10-29
Citations: 303 S.C. 169
Docket Number: 
Parties: BLACKBURN AND COMPANY, INC., Petitioner v. William G. DUDLEY, III and KTM Broadcasting Company, Inc., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Carolina Reports
Volume: 303
Pages: 169–169

Head Matter:
BLACKBURN AND COMPANY, INC., Petitioner v. William G. DUDLEY, III and KTM Broadcasting Company, Inc., Respondents.
(399 S.E. (2d) 592)
Supreme Court
Arnold S. Goodstein and Mary Ann Marwick, both of Good-stein and Goodstein, Summerville, for petitioner.
Mark H. Wall, of Robinson, Craver, Wall and Hastie, Charleston, for respondents.
Oct. 29, 1990.

Opinion:
ORDER
Per Curiam:
Due to inconsistencies between the record and statements by the attorneys as to the verdict returned and the resulting consequences, it is the opinion of this Court that justice requires the vacating of the trial of this matter in the circuit court and of the opinion of the Court of Appeals found at Blackburn & Co., Inc. v. Dudley, 298 S.C. 538, 381 S.E. (2d) 918 (Ct. App. 1989). We remand the matter to the circuit court for a new trial de novo with the right for all parties to amend their pleadings. The case shall be restored to a place of priority on the trial roster.
It is so ordered.