Case Name: Otto Davis, by Emma Davis, His Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. The Broadalbin Knitting Company, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1906-06-21
Citations: 185 N.Y. 613
Docket Number: 
Parties: Otto Davis, by Emma Davis, His Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. The Broadalbin Knitting Company, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 185
Pages: 613–613

Head Matter:
Otto Davis, by Emma Davis, His Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. The Broadalbin Knitting Company, Respondent.
Davis v. Broadalbin Knitting Co., 90 App. Div. 567, affirmed.
(Argued June 7, 1906;
decided June 21, 1906.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered February IT, 1904, which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial and granted a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by defendant’s negligence.
Ilenry V. Borst and Florence J. Sulli/ocm for appellant.
Lewis E. Garr and Edward W. Douglas for respondent.

Opinion:
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellant on the stipulation, with costs in all the courts; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Werner and Hiscock, JJ. Absent: O'Brien, J. Not sitting: Chase, J.