Case Name: Edward VALE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-12-01
Citations: 773 So. 2d 1193
Docket Number: No. 5D00-458
Parties: Edward VALE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: THOMPSON, C.J., and COBB, J., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 773
Pages: 1193–1193

Head Matter:
Edward VALE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D00-458.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Dec. 1, 2000.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 4, 2001.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Lyle Hitchens, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Angela D. McCravy, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PLEUS, J.
The appellant attempts to assert for the first time on appeal that his arrest was unlawful because the officers did not have the authority to enter his house. This issue was waived by appellant because in the proceedings below, appellant's counsel specifically stated that she was not arguing that his arrest was unlawful, but that the officers had used excessive force in making the appellant's arrest. See Gibson v. State, 533 So.2d 338 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988) (even non-fundamental constitutional errors are waived if not objected to); Baglio v. State, 467 So.2d 1030 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985) (where defense counsel specifically stated in proceedings below that he had no objection to admitted evidence, appellate review waived).
Accordingly, appellant's judgment and sentence are affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
THOMPSON, C.J., and COBB, J., concur.