Case Name: GLICK FINLEY, LLC and, Karen Finley, Appellants, v. Thomas G. GLICK, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2008-03-18
Citations: 254 S.W.3d 105
Docket Number: No. ED 89696
Parties: GLICK FINLEY, LLC and, Karen Finley, Appellants, v. Thomas G. GLICK, Respondent.
Judges: Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 254
Pages: 105–105

Head Matter:
GLICK FINLEY, LLC and, Karen Finley, Appellants, v. Thomas G. GLICK, Respondent.
No. ED 89696.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
March 18, 2008.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 29, 2008.
Application for Transfer Denied June 24, 2008.
Terrance J. Good, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Michael P. Gunn, John R. Gunn, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Karen I. Finley (hereinafter, "Finley") and Glick Finley, LLC (hereinafter, "the Firm" and collectively as "Appellants") appeal from the trial court's judgment granting Thomas G. Glick's (hereinafter, "Glick") counterclaim/cross-claim requesting the involuntary dissolution of the Firm and the appointment of a receiver. Appellants raise three points on appeal.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and transcript on appeal. We find no error. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the trial court's judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).