Case Name: GEORGE F. HEWSON, APPELLANT, v. CITY OF NEWARK ET AL., RESPONDENTS
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1921-02-28
Citations: 95 N.J.L. 544
Docket Number: 
Parties: GEORGE F. HEWSON, APPELLANT, v. CITY OF NEWARK ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Judges: For affirmance — The ChaNoellor, Chief Justioe, TrENCI-IAKD, PARKER, BERGEN, MiNturN, Kalisoh, Tyat-ZENBACIT, HEPPENI-IEIMER, WILLIAMS, TAYLOR, GARDNER, AoKersoN, JJ. 13.
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 95
Pages: 544–544

Head Matter:
GEORGE F. HEWSON, APPELLANT, v. CITY OF NEWARK ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Submitted December 6, 1920
Decided February 28, 1921.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 95 N. J. L. 28.
For the appellant, Fdwwv G. Adams'.
For the respondents, Jerome T. Oongleton.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Swayze in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The ChaNoellor, Chief Justioe, TrENCI-IAKD, PARKER, BERGEN, MiNturN, Kalisoh, Tyat-ZENBACIT, HEPPENI-IEIMER, WILLIAMS, TAYLOR, GARDNER, AoKersoN, JJ. 13.
For reversal — White, J. 1.