Case Name: Stanton Warburton, Respondent v. E. G. Bacon et al., Appellants
Court: Washington Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Washington
Decision Date: 1896-11-16
Citations: 15 Wash. 700
Docket Number: No. 2287
Parties: Stanton Warburton, Respondent v. E. G. Bacon et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Washington Reports
Volume: 15
Pages: 700–700

Head Matter:
[No. 2287.
Decided November 16, 1896.]
Stanton Warburton, Respondent v. E. G. Bacon et al., Appellants.
Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County.— Hon. W. H. Pritchard, Judge.
Affirmed.
Coiner & Shackleford, and Joseph C. Dillow, (L. P. Shackleford, of counsel), for appellant.
Stanton Warburton, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The errors complained of in this case relate in substance to the facts found by the lower court. After a consideration of the proofs and the able argument of appellants counsel, we are hot satisfied that such findings should be materially set aside or modified, however we might have found theron as an original proposition. A discussion of the proofs would serve no purpose in the published reports and the judgment is affirmed.