Case Name: Epstein et al. v. Esserman et al.
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1929-04-09
Citations: 39 Ga. App. 522
Docket Number: 19454
Parties: Epstein et al. v. Esserman et al.
Judges: Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 39
Pages: 522–522

Head Matter:
19454.
Epstein et al. v. Esserman et al.
Decided April 9, 1929.
Wright, Wright & Oovingion, for plaintiffs.
Maddox, Matthews & Owens, for defendants.

Opinion:
Broyles, C. J.
1. Under the pleadings the court did not err in ruling that the defendants had the right to open and conclude the argument.
2. In the light of the facts of the ease and the charge of the court, none of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial, complaining of certain excerpts from the charge and of the failure to charge certain things, show error requiring a new trial.
3. The verdict was authorized by the evidence.
Judgment affirmed.
Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.