Case Name: Rose BRAVO, Appellant, v. Matilda SAUTER, as Successor Trustee of the Vincent J. Bravo Revocable Trust Agreement (as amended), and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Vincent J. Bravo, Deceased, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1997-09-03
Citations: 745 So. 2d 959
Docket Number: No. 97-1576
Parties: Rose BRAVO, Appellant, v. Matilda SAUTER, as Successor Trustee of the Vincent J. Bravo Revocable Trust Agreement (as amended), and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Vincent J. Bravo, Deceased, Appellee.
Judges: GLICKSTEIN, STEVENSON and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 745
Pages: 959–959

Head Matter:
Rose BRAVO, Appellant, v. Matilda SAUTER, as Successor Trustee of the Vincent J. Bravo Revocable Trust Agreement (as amended), and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Vincent J. Bravo, Deceased, Appellee.
No. 97-1576.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Sept. 3, 1997.
Steven D. Ginsburg and William Jay Palmer of Adorno & Zeder, P.A., Miami for appellant.
James A. Herb of Herb & Mednick, Boca Raton, for appellee.

Opinion:
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
PER CURIAM.
We grant the motion and withdraw the opinion previously issued.
The motion to dismiss is treated as premature and denied without prejudice to renew after the filing of the record and briefs.
GLICKSTEIN, STEVENSON and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.