Case Name: Jack R. CROTEAU, Appellant, v. BORDEN COMPANY and Eastman Kodak Corporation
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1968-06-04
Citations: 395 F.2d 771
Docket Number: No. 17104
Parties: Jack R. CROTEAU, Appellant, v. BORDEN COMPANY and Eastman Kodak Corporation.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 395
Pages: 771–772

Head Matter:
Jack R. CROTEAU, Appellant, v. BORDEN COMPANY and Eastman Kodak Corporation.
No. 17104.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued May 21, 1968.
Decided June 4, 1968.
Charles F.,Love, Freedman, Borowsky & Lorry, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.
Victor L. Drexel, Pepper, Hamilton & Scheetz, Philadelphia, Pa. (Dolores B. Sesso, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.
Before McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER and STALEY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a judgment for the defendant Eastman Kodak Company entered upon a verdict directed by the district court after the close of the defendant's case. The district court held, inter alia, that Eastman Kodak's failure to warn was not the proximate cause of an explosion which resulted in plaintiff's loss of his left hand. See Croteau v. Borden Co., 277 F.Supp. 945 (E.D.Pa.1968).
We have independently examined the entire record, and we can find no error. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court will be affirmed.
. The district court also entered judgment in favor of defendant Borden Company, but plaintiff did not appeal from this judgment.