Case Name: In the Matter of Carl D. Rosel, Appellant, v. Thomas F. Hart, as Ulster County Commissioner of Public Works, et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1994-06-21
Citations: 83 N.Y.2d 951
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Carl D. Rosel, Appellant, v Thomas F. Hart, as Ulster County Commissioner of Public Works, et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 83
Pages: 951–952

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Carl D. Rosel, Appellant, v Thomas F. Hart, as Ulster County Commissioner of Public Works, et al., Respondents.
Submitted May 16, 1994;
decided June 21, 1994

Opinion:
On the Court's own motion, appeal transferred, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, to the Appellate Division, Third Department, upon the ground that a direct appeal does not lie when questions other than the constitutional validity of a statutory provision are involved (NY Const, art VI, §3 [b] [2]; § 5 [b]; CPLR 5601 [b] [2]). Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.