Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Joseph T. CARPENTER, Defendant/Appellant; Joseph T. CARPENTER, Movant/ Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1991-10-08
Citations: 815 S.W.2d 958
Docket Number: Nos. 55560, 59717
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Joseph T. CARPENTER, Defendant/Appellant. Joseph T. CARPENTER, Movant/ Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 815
Pages: 958–959

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Joseph T. CARPENTER, Defendant/Appellant. Joseph T. CARPENTER, Movant/ Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Nos. 55560, 59717.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Oct. 8, 1991.
Rosalynn Koch, Columbia, for defendant/appellant.
William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff/respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of burglary in the second degree, § 569.170, RSMo 1978, and stealing over $150, § 570.030, RSMo 1978, and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without a full evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
The judgments are based upon findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).