Case Name: Marguerite G. BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Nurse BRENDA; Nurse Liala; Doctor Reese, Defendants-Appellees, and Rappahannock Regional Jail; Rappahannock Regional Jail Staff, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-04-04
Citations: 223 F. App'x 221
Docket Number: No. 06-7741
Parties: Marguerite G. BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Nurse BRENDA; Nurse Liala; Doctor Reese, Defendants-Appellees, and Rappahannock Regional Jail; Rappahannock Regional Jail Staff, Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 223
Pages: 221–222

Head Matter:
Marguerite G. BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Nurse BRENDA; Nurse Liala; Doctor Reese, Defendants-Appellees, and Rappahannock Regional Jail; Rappahannock Regional Jail Staff, Defendants.
No. 06-7741.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 29, 2007.
Decided: April 4, 2007.
Marguerite G. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Martin Muldowney, Rawls & McNelis, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before MÓTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Marguerite G. Brown appeals the district court's order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Doctor Reese, No. 1:05-cv-00029-GBL (E.D.Va. Sept. 13, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.