Case Name: Anthony L. TRIMMING, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1971-10-26
Citations: 253 So. 2d 720
Docket Number: No. 71-592
Parties: Anthony L. TRIMMING, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SWANN, C. J., and PEARSON and BARKDULL, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 253
Pages: 720–720

Head Matter:
Anthony L. TRIMMING, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 71-592.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 26, 1971.
Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and Lewis S. Kimler, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before SWANN, C. J., and PEARSON and BARKDULL, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant was found guilty by a jury and adjudicated guilty of breaking and entering with intent to commit a felony, to wit: Grand Larceny. On this appeal it is urged that the trial court erred in allowing a rebuttal witness to testify over appellant's objection. The rebuttal witness was properly called to rebut by prior, inconsistent statements the testimony of the appellant given in his own behalf. Barkley v. State, 152 Fla. 147, 10 So.2d 922 (1942).
Affirmed.