Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kevin Anthony DUDLEY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-04-06
Citations: 174 F. App'x 765
Docket Number: No. 05-7458
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Kevin Anthony DUDLEY, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 174
Pages: 765–765

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Kevin Anthony DUDLEY, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 05-7458.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 30, 2006.
Decided: April 6, 2006.
Kevin Anthony Dudley, Appellant Pro Se. James Marton Trusty, Office of the United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Kevin Anthony Dudley appeals the district court's order denying his motion to correct sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Dudley, No. CR-03-253-8-PJM (D.Md. Aug. 23, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
We do not address Dudley's claim that his plea agreement should be withdrawn as this claim was raised for the first time on appeal. See Muth v. United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir.1993) (holding that issues raised for the first time on appeal are generally waived absent exceptional circumstances).