Case Name: Damian COMESANA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-12-11
Citations: 831 So. 2d 819
Docket Number: No. 3D01-1982
Parties: Damian COMESANA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before LEVY, GREEN, and SHEVIN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 831
Pages: 819–819

Head Matter:
Damian COMESANA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D01-1982.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 11, 2002.
Peter Raben, Coconut Grove, for appellant.
Richard E. Doran, Attorney General and Linda S. Katz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before LEVY, GREEN, and SHEVIN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm appellant's conviction and sentence as we find any claimed error on the challenged evidentiary rulings to be invited and/or harmless. See Czubak v. State, 570 So.2d 925, 928 (Fla.1990)(under invited error doctrine, party may not make or invite error and then take advantage of error on appeal); Phillips v. State, 739 So.2d 632, 632 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999)(eviden-tiary issues were subject to harmless error analysis and not reversible when they did not affect the verdict).