Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shaun W. BRIDGES, a.k.a. Number13, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-04-11
Citations: 686 F. App'x 491
Docket Number: No. 15-10590
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shaun W. BRIDGES, a.k.a. Number13, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 686
Pages: 491–492

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shaun W. BRIDGES, a.k.a. Number13, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-10590
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 7, 2017
Filed April 11, 2017
Merry Jean Chan, Esquire, J. Douglas Wilson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, DOJ-USAO, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Shaun W. Bridges appeals from the district court's judgment and challenges his 71-month sentence for money laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1957, and obstruction of justice, in violation .of 18 U.S.C. § 1512. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Bridges's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Bridges has waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Because the record discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the appeal waiver, we dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 .(9th Cir. 2009).
Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.