Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DANIEL BYRON WHITTLINGER, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1996-07-24
Citations: 142 Or. App. 308
Docket Number: 94C-20141; CA A88190
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DANIEL BYRON WHITTLINGER, Appellant.
Judges: Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Landau, J udges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 142
Pages: 308–309

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted June 27,
affirmed July 24, 1996
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DANIEL BYRON WHITTLINGER, Appellant.
(94C-20141; CA A88190)
919 P2d 1206
Ingrid A. MacFarlane, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender.
Ann F. Kelley, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.
Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Landau, J udges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant, an inmate at the Oregon State Prison, appeals his conviction for possession of a weapon by an inmate. ORS 166.275. He argues that the conviction violates the state and federal double jeopardy clauses because he had previously received prison discipline for the same conduct. In State v. Rezin, 139 Or App 156, 911 P2d 1264, withdrawn by order March 28, 1996, we resolved the issues that defendant raises contrary to his contentions. We withdrew the opinion in Rezin under ORAP 8.05(2) when we learned that the defendant had died before we issued the opinion. We now readopt and reaffirm our reasoning in Rezin and therefore affirm defendant's conviction in this case.
Affirmed.