Case Name: TRANS-LUX MIDWEST CORPORATION, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent/Cross-Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-12-26
Citations: 53 F. App'x 571
Docket Number: Nos. 01-1434, 02-1274
Parties: TRANS-LUX MIDWEST CORPORATION, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent/Cross-Petitioner.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 53
Pages: 571–571

Head Matter:
TRANS-LUX MIDWEST CORPORATION, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent/Cross-Petitioner.
Nos. 01-1434, 02-1274.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Dec. 26, 2002.
Before GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and SENTELLE and TATEL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
JUDGMENT
PER curiam:.
This cause was considered on the record compiled before the National Labor Relations Board and on the briefs filed by the parties. It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition for review be DENIED and the cross-application for enforcement be GRANTED. The Board's conclusion that Trans-Lux did not have a good faith reasonable doubt about the majority status of the Union is based upon substantial evidence in the record. See Trans-Lux Midwest Corporation and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 347, 335 NLRB No. 22 (2001).
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.