Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leo Leon EDWARDS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-06-07
Citations: 436 F. App'x 769
Docket Number: Nos. 10-10205, 10-10206
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leo Leon EDWARDS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: PREGERSON, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 436
Pages: 769–770

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leo Leon EDWARDS, Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 10-10205, 10-10206.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 24, 2011.
Filed June 7, 2011.
Randall M. Howe, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Tara Kristine Hoveland, Bigfork, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: PREGERSON, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Leo Leon Edwards appeals from the lifetime term of supervised release imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for failure to register as a convicted sex offender, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we dismiss.
Edwards contends that the district court abused its discretion and failed to explain adequately the imposition of a lifetime term supervised release. The valid and enforceable appeal waiver precludes our review of these contentions. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir.2009).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.