Case Name: Janet M. DEYERBERG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bob WOODWARD; Tony Kornheiser; The Washington Post Company; Christopher Hitchens; Vanity Fair Magazine, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-05-17
Citations: 131 F. App'x 422
Docket Number: No. 04-1907
Parties: Janet M. DEYERBERG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bob WOODWARD; Tony Kornheiser; The Washington Post Company; Christopher Hitchens; Vanity Fair Magazine, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 131
Pages: 422–423

Head Matter:
Janet M. DEYERBERG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bob WOODWARD; Tony Kornheiser; The Washington Post Company; Christopher Hitchens; Vanity Fair Magazine, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 04-1907.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 30, 2005.
Decided: May 17, 2005.
Janet M. Deyerberg, Appellant pro se.
Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Janet M. Deyerberg appeals the district court order dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action for fading to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Deyerberg v. Woodward, No. CA-04-1118-AW (D. Md. June 17, 2004). We deny Deyerberg's motion for depositions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED