Case Name: Charles N. MESSINA, Agnes Messina, Lehigh Asphalt Paving and Construction Co., Petitioners v. EAST PENN TOWNSHIP, Respondent Nancy Blaha and Christopher Pekurny, Intervenors
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2010-12-07
Citations: 607 Pa. 623
Docket Number: No. 452 MAL 2010
Parties: Charles N. MESSINA, Agnes Messina, Lehigh Asphalt Paving and Construction Co., Petitioners v. EAST PENN TOWNSHIP, Respondent Nancy Blaha and Christopher Pekurny, Intervenors.
Judges: 
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 607
Pages: 623–624

Head Matter:
9 A.3d 1136
Charles N. MESSINA, Agnes Messina, Lehigh Asphalt Paving and Construction Co., Petitioners v. EAST PENN TOWNSHIP, Respondent Nancy Blaha and Christopher Pekurny, Intervenors.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Dec. 7, 2010.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 7th day of December, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, rephrased for clarity, are:
(1) Whether 42 Pa.C.S. § 5571.1 precludes a procedural validity challenge brought more than two years after the effective date of the ordinance.
(2) Whether the failure to re-advertise the proposed zoning ordinance after changes were made to the zoning map prior to adoption invalidated the ordinance.