Case Name: Amy TERASAKA, Employee v. AT & T, Employer, Self-Insured (Gates McDonald, Servicing Agent).
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 2006-10-06
Citations: 634 S.E.2d 888
Docket Number: No. 696A05.
Parties: Amy TERASAKA, Employee
v.
AT & T, Employer, Self-Insured (Gates McDonald, Servicing Agent).
Judges: 
Reporter: South Eastern Reporter 2d
Volume: 634
Pages: 888–888

Head Matter:
Amy TERASAKA, Employee
v.
AT & T, Employer, Self-Insured (Gates McDonald, Servicing Agent).
No. 696A05.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
October 6, 2006.
Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C.App. ___, 622 S.E.2d 145 (2005), reversing an opinion and award filed on 5 August 2004 by the North Carolina Industrial Commission. On 2 March 2006, the Supreme Court allowed defendant's petition for discretionary review as to additional issues. Heard in the Supreme Court 12 September 2006.
Frederick R. Stann, Gastonia, for plaintiff-appellant/appellee.
Brooks, Stevens & Pope, P.A., by Joy H. Brewer and Kimberley A. D'Arruda, Cary, for defendant-appellee/appellant.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
As to the appeal of right based on the dissenting opinion, we affirm the majority decision of the Court of Appeals. We conclude that the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed.
AFFIRMED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.