Case Name: ASSOCIATION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF FREEDOM OF CHOICE, INC., and Charles P. Mong, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Robert F. WAGNER, Daniel S. Weiss, Louis Okin, Earl Brown, and Stanley M. Isaacs, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1962-02-06
Citations: 298 F.2d 522
Docket Number: No. 222, Docket 27136
Parties: ASSOCIATION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF FREEDOM OF CHOICE, INC., and Charles P. Mong, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Robert F. WAGNER, Daniel S. Weiss, Louis Okin, Earl Brown, and Stanley M. Isaacs, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MEDINA', MOORE and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 298
Pages: 522–522

Head Matter:
ASSOCIATION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF FREEDOM OF CHOICE, INC., and Charles P. Mong, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Robert F. WAGNER, Daniel S. Weiss, Louis Okin, Earl Brown, and Stanley M. Isaacs, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 222, Docket 27136.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued Jan. 19, 1962.
Decided Feb. 6, 1962.
Alfred Avins, New York City, for plaintiffs-appellants.
Alfred Weinstein, New York City (Seymour B. Quel and Leo A. Larkin, Corp. Counsel, New York City, on the brief), for defendants-appellees.
Before MEDINA', MOORE and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The action is against the May- or of the City of New York and members of the Council of the City of New York with reference to the appointment by the Council of Edward R. Dudley as President of the Borough of Manhattan, in the City of New York. Since the commencement of the action Edward R. Dudley has been duly nominated for and elected to the office of President of the said Borough of Manhattan, and the motion to dismiss the appeal as moot is granted. Moreover, the allegations of the complaint are wholly insufficient to support any prayer for general injunctive relief in futuro against public officials.
Appeal dismissed as moot.