Case Name: Antron TAYLOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2019-03-12
Citations: 569 S.W.3d 563
Docket Number: No. ED 106923
Parties: Antron TAYLOR, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr. J., and Colleen Dolan, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 569
Pages: 563–563

Head Matter:
Antron TAYLOR, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 106923
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
FILED: March 12, 2019
Ryan Fanning, 1010 Market St., Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.
Before Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr. J., and Colleen Dolan, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Antron Taylor ("Taylor") appeals from the motion court's denial of his Rule 24.035 motion seeking post-conviction relief. Taylor pleaded guilty to a Class C felony of stealing in violation of Section 570.030. Taylor argues appeal that, pursuant to State v. Bazell, 497 S.W.3d 263 (Mo. banc 2016), his sentence should have been based on a class A misdemeanor, not a class C felony. Because Bazell does not apply retroactively to Taylor's plea and sentencing, we affirm the motion court's judgment.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).