Case Name: WORTHINGTON, BELLOWS & CO. v. WHITMAN
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1921-11-25
Citations: 1 Ohio Law Abs. 375
Docket Number: 
Parties: WORTHINGTON, BELLOWS & CO. v. WHITMAN
Judges: 
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 1
Pages: 375–375

Head Matter:
No. 368
WORTHINGTON, BELLOWS & CO. v. WHITMAN
Ohio Court of Appeals,
Nov. 25, 1921
15 Ohio App. 161
NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS — Defense—Consid- . eration a gambling transaction — Stock margins— 5966 GC. — Proviso—Broker of stock exchange— Evidence of intent to gamble.
Attorneys — Wilkin, Cross & Daoust, for plaintiff in error; John A. Elden, Contra.

Opinion:
SULLIVAN, J.
Error to Cuyahoga Common Pleas; judgment reversed.