Case Name: Charles A. TREECE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carolyn W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-10-25
Citations: 670 F. App'x 89
Docket Number: No. 16-1394
Parties: Charles A. TREECE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carolyn W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 670
Pages: 89–90

Head Matter:
Charles A. TREECE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carolyn W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 16-1394
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: September 30, 2016
Decided: October 25, 2016
Charles A. Treece, Appellant Pro Se. Maya DiDomenico, Assistant Regional Counsel, Antonia Maria Pfeffer, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Social Security Administration, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Charles A. Treece appeals the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation to affirm the Commissioner's suspension of Treece's old-age insurance benefits. Our review of the Commissioner's determination is limited to evaluating whether the findings are supported by substantial evidence and whether the correct law was applied. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2012); Johnson v. Barnhart, 434 F.3d 650, 653 (4th Cir. 2005).
We'have reviewed the parties' briefs and the record and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. Treece v. Colvin, No. 1:14-cv-01077-NCT-LPA, 2016 WL 1181704 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 25, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED