Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. WILLIAM J. BALLEW, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1986-07-23
Citations: 80 Or. App. 457
Docket Number: 83-3477-K; CA A38140
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. WILLIAM J. BALLEW, Appellant.
Judges: Before Warden, Presiding Judge, and Van Hoomissen and Young, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 80
Pages: 457–458

Head Matter:
Submitted on record and briefs April 9,
reversed and remanded July 23, 1986
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. WILLIAM J. BALLEW, Appellant.
(83-3477-K; CA A38140)
722 P2d 60
Raymond W. Hess, Grants Pass, filed the brief for appellant.
Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, James E. Mountain, Jr., Solicitor General, and Jeff Bennett, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Warden, Presiding Judge, and Van Hoomissen and Young, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant was convicted of driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII). His sentence was reversed and the case was remanded for resentencing in State v. Ballew, 70 Or App 617, 689 P2d 1330 (1984), because the trial court imposed costs and fines as conditions of probation without first considering defendant's ability to pay. On remand, defendant requested assistance of counsel. The trial judge denied his request and imposed the same sentence, again without inquiring into defendant's ability to pay the costs and fines. The state confesses error in the trial judge's failure to appoint an attorney to assist defendant at resentencing. See State ex rel Russell v. Jones, 293 Or 312, 315, 647 P2d 904 (1982). The state also confesses error in the trial judge's failure, as at defendant's first sentencing, to inquire into defendant's present and future ability to pay the costs and fines imposed. State v. Ballew, supra.
Reversed and remanded for appointment of counsel and for resentencing.