Case Name: James Lawlor, Respondent, v. Magnolia Metal Company, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1899-10
Citations: 44 A.D. 632
Docket Number: 
Parties: James Lawlor, Respondent, v. Magnolia Metal Company, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 44
Pages: 632–633

Head Matter:
James Lawlor, Respondent, v. Magnolia Metal Company, Appellant.
Order affirmed, ivitli ten dollars costs and disbursements.—Appeal from an order denying the defendant’s motion to require the plaintiff to increase-his undertaking on attachment.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
The learned judge was justified in denying the motion because it was a renewal of amotion, without leave, which had. "been denied four years ago. The order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Present —Van Brunt, P. J., Rumsey, Patterson, O'Brien and Ingraham,