Case Name: Menike, Respondent, v. Manhattan Ry. Co., Appellant
Court: New York Superior Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1892-01-11
Citations: 17 N.Y.S. 954
Docket Number: 
Parties: Menike, Respondent, v. Manhattan Ry. Co., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 17
Pages: 954–954

Head Matter:
Menike, Respondent, v. Manhattan Ry. Co., Appellant.
(Superior Court of New York City, General Term.
January 11, 1892.)
Appeal from jury term.
Action by Julia Menike against the Manhattan Railway Company for personal injuries. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff.
Argued before Freedman, McAdam, and Gildersleeve, JJ.
Davies & Rapallo,'(Julien T. Davies and Brainard Tolies, of counsel,) for appellant. George J. Greenfield, (W. Allaire iShortt, of counsel,) for respondent.

Opinion:
Freedman, J.
This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff through the negligence of defendant's servants in attempting to get on board of one of the trains of defendant's railway. Upon the trial the defendant produced no evidence, and the case was submitted to the jury upon the testimony given by and on behalf of the plaintiff. Upon such testimony the case was clearly one for the jury. A dismissal of the complaint would have been error. All the questions as to which the trial judge was requested to charge were submitted to the jury under a charge which fully guarded every right the defendant had. The jury were expressly instructed that they might render a verdict for the defendant, although the testimony of the plaintiff was uncontradicted. Upon the whole case no exception appears of sufficient merit to call for reversal. The judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs.