Case Name: Guillermo Robles, Appellant, v. New York City Housing Authority, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2014-06-10
Citations: 23 N.Y.3d 982
Docket Number: 
Parties: Guillermo Robles, Appellant, v New York City Housing Authority, Respondent.
Judges: Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam.
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 23
Pages: 982–984

Head Matter:
[13 NE3d 660, 990 NYS2d 160]
Guillermo Robles, Appellant, v New York City Housing Authority, Respondent.
Decided June 10, 2014
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Bragoli & Associates, P.C., Melville (Susan R. Nudelman of counsel), for appellant.
Cullen and Dykman LLP, New York City (Joseph C. Fegan of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, with costs, and defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint denied. The Appellate Division improperly concluded that defendant was entitled to summary judgment, as defendant failed to show that it was prejudiced by any defect in plaintiffs notice of claim (see generally General Municipal Law § 50-e [6]), and triable issues of fact remain.
Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam.