Case Name: Carlos Santiago, Appellant, v. City of New York et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2010-03-09
Citations: 71 A.D.3d 468
Docket Number: 
Parties: Carlos Santiago, Appellant, v City of New York et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 71
Pages: 468–469

Head Matter:
Carlos Santiago, Appellant, v City of New York et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.
[894 NYS2d 873]

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Larry S. Schachner, J.), entered on or about March 6, 2009, which granted defendants-respondents' motions pursuant to CPLR 3126 dismissing the complaint as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The complaint was properly dismissed for persistent, unexplained noncompliance with four disclosure orders, including a self-executing conditional order of dismissal that was granted on default and became absolute (see AWL Indus., Inc. v QBE Ins. Corp., 65 AD3d 904 [2009]; Min Yoon v Costello, 29 AD3d 407 [2006]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Friedman, Sweeny, Nardelli and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.