Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Anthony Marchese, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1999-05-04
Citations: 261 A.D.2d 104
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Marchese, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 261
Pages: 104–104

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Marchese, Appellant.
[689 NYS2d 91]

Opinion:
—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Nicholas Iacovetta, J.), rendered April 11, 1995, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 5¥2 to 11 years, unanimously affirmed.
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the jury's credibility determinations.
Since defendant asked the court to assign the foreperson's duties to juror number two, rather than the first alternate, who had replaced the original foreperson after the jurors had been sworn, defendant waived his current objections. Although, under CPL 270.35, the first alternate should have replaced the discharged foreperson for all purposes (People v Kellogg, 210 AD2d 912, 913, lv denied 86 NY2d 737; People v Rosa, 122 Misc 2d 905), we find this irregularity to be waivable (see, People v Agramonte, 87 NY2d 765, 769-770; People v Webb, 78 NY2d 335, 338-339). In any event, the error could not have caused any prejudice to defendant because the law recognizes no special function for a foreperson except to speak for the jury (People v Rosa, supra). Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Williams, Mazzarelli and Buckley, JJ.