Case Name: Tom Treadaway v. The State
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1910-03-30
Citations: 61 Tex. Crim. 546
Docket Number: No. 148
Parties: Tom Treadaway v. The State.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Criminal Reports
Volume: 61
Pages: 546–547

Head Matter:
Tom Treadaway v. The State.
No. 148.
Decided March 30, 1910.
Rehearing Denied March 15, 1911.
1. —Aggravated Assault—Indictment—Constitutional Law.
Where the information copied in the transcript did not begin and conclude as required by the Constitution and the statutes, the same was reversible error; and a complaint and information attached to the motion for rehearing which was in proper form but was not the basis of the prosecution as disclosed by the record could not be considered.
2. —Same—Evidence—Other Transactions.
Where defendant was on trial for an alleged whipping of his wife, testimony as to how many times he had been married, and - his conduct to his former wife was inadmissible.
. Appeal from the County Court of Hacogdoches. Tried below before the Hon. C. D. Mims.
. Appeal from a conviction of aggravated assault; penalty, a fine of $500 and two years confinement in the county jail.
The opinion states the case.
Ingraham, Middlebrook & Hodges, for appellant.
Felix J. McCord, Assistant Attorney-General, and Geo. S. King, for the State.

Opinion:
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
—Appellant was convicted of an aggravated assault, and prosecutes an appeal.
The information as copied in'the transcript does not begin, "In the name and by the authority of the State of Texas," nor does it conclude "against the peace and dignity of the State," as is required by the Constitution and statutes of this State.
This judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
McCord, Judge, not sitting.