Case Name: Jose ORROSQUIETA-TRUJILLO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Alberto GONZALES, Attorney General; et al., Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-03-07
Citations: 122 F. App'x 897
Docket Number: No. 03-56756
Parties: Jose ORROSQUIETA-TRUJILLO, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Alberto GONZALES, Attorney General; et al., Respondents—Appellees.
Judges: Before: KOZINSKI, TROTT and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 122
Pages: 897–898

Head Matter:
Jose ORROSQUIETA-TRUJILLO, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Alberto GONZALES, Attorney General; et al., Respondents—Appellees.
No. 03-56756.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 17, 2005.
Decided March 7, 2005.
Jaime Jasso, Immigration Appealworks, Westlake Village, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.
Jason K. Axe, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney Civil & Tax Divisions, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondents-Appellees.
Before: KOZINSKI, TROTT and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Alberto Gonzales is substituted for his predecessor, John Ashcroft, as Attorney General. See Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Petitioner Jose Orrosquieta-Trujillo appeals the district court's denial of his habeas corpus petition brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. We affirm.
Petitioner has failed to identify any constitutional or statutory error committed by the Immigration Judge and Bureau of Immigration Appeals in reaching the determination that Petitioner is ineligible for cancellation of removal. While Petitioner has attempted to argue that the IJ and BIA violated his right to due process in denying his application, Petitioner has not alleged a colorable constitutional violation. Thus, his habeas petition is more properly construed as an attempt to change the discretionary result reached by the IJ and BIA. Federal courts lack jurisdiction to review this type of claim under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Gutierrez-Chavez v. INS, 298 F.3d 824, 829-30 (9th Cir.2002).
AFFIRMED.
xhiS disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.