Case Name: Sergei PORTNOY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U.S. BANK NA, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-07-24
Citations: 286 F. App'x 441
Docket Number: No. 08-15583
Parties: Sergei PORTNOY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U.S. BANK NA, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 286
Pages: 441–442

Head Matter:
Sergei PORTNOY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U.S. BANK NA, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 08-15583.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 14, 2008.
Filed July 24, 2008.
Sergei Portnoy, Pro Se.
Juan C. Basombrio, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Irvine, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before: SCHROEDER, LEAVY and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
A review of the record and the parties' responses to the order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accord ingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.