Case Name: In re Ellen D. TRUSTY, Debtor. Terry Trusty, Plaintiff-Appellant, Ellen D. Trusty, Debtor-Appellant, v. Stephen D. Jones; Patricia A. McKenzie; Damascus Community Bank, Defendants-Appellees, and Gerard Richard Vetter, Trustee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-11-14
Citations: 357 B.R. 325
Docket Number: No. 05-2178
Parties: In re Ellen D. TRUSTY, Debtor. Terry Trusty, Plaintiff-Appellant, Ellen D. Trusty, Debtor-Appellant, v. Stephen D. Jones; Patricia A. McKenzie; Damascus Community Bank, Defendants-Appellees, and Gerard Richard Vetter, Trustee.
Judges: Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Bankruptcy Reporter
Volume: 357
Pages: 325–326

Head Matter:
In re Ellen D. TRUSTY, Debtor. Terry Trusty, Plaintiff-Appellant, Ellen D. Trusty, Debtor-Appellant, v. Stephen D. Jones; Patricia A. McKenzie; Damascus Community Bank, Defendants-Appellees, and Gerard Richard Vetter, Trustee.
No. 05-2178.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 29, 2006.
Decided: Nov. 14, 2006.
Terry Trusty, Ellen D. Trusty, Appellants Pro Se. Stephen D. Jones, Appellee Pro Se; Thomas J. Althauser, ECCLE-STON & WOLF, Baltimore, Maryland; Gary A. Rosen, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellants appeal from the district court's orders affirming the bankruptcy court's orders denying relief in their action alleging fraud by the Defendants and seeking to reinstate a previous contract the Trustys had with Jones. We have reviewed the record and decisions of the bankruptcy court and the district court and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the lower courts. See Trusty v. Jones, Nos. CA05-1411-JFM; BK-01-51942; AP-01-5148 (D. Md. July 18, 2005; Sept. 15, 2005). We deny the Trustys' motion for a stay and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.