Case Name: Kevin Pfeiffer, Respondent, v. Charles E. Hoye, Defendant. (Action No. 1.); Gregory C. Lessing, Respondent, v. Charles E. Hoye et al., Defendants, and William Hitter, Appellant. (Action No. 2.); Kevin Pfeiffer, Respondent, v. William Hitter, Appellant. (Action No. 3.)
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1993-11-22
Citations: 198 A.D.2d 405
Docket Number: 
Parties: Kevin Pfeiffer, Respondent, v Charles E. Hoye, Defendant. (Action No. 1.) Gregory C. Lessing, Respondent, v Charles E. Hoye et al., Defendants, and William Hitter, Appellant. (Action No. 2.) Kevin Pfeiffer, Respondent, v William Hitter, Appellant. (Action No. 3.)
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 198
Pages: 405–405

Head Matter:
Kevin Pfeiffer, Respondent, v Charles E. Hoye, Defendant. (Action No. 1.) Gregory C. Lessing, Respondent, v Charles E. Hoye et al., Defendants, and William Hitter, Appellant. (Action No. 2.) Kevin Pfeiffer, Respondent, v William Hitter, Appellant. (Action No. 3.)
[605 NYS2d 903]

Opinion:
—In three related actions to recover damages for personal injuries, which were to be jointly tried, William Hitter, a defendant in two of the actions, appeals for so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jones, J.), entered November 1, 1991, as denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing all claims against him.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.
Contrary to the contentions of the appellant, the Supreme Court correctly concluded that there were triable issues of fact as to the occurrence of the accident and whether the appellant was free from negligence (see, CPLR 3212 [b]; Rotuba Extruders v Ceppos, 46 NY2d 223; Crowley v Acampora, 144 AD2d 330). Bracken, J. P., Balletta, Miller and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.