Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Forest GIBBS, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-06-17
Citations: 135 F. App'x 609
Docket Number: No. 05-6516
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Forest GIBBS, Jr., Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 135
Pages: 609–610

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Forest GIBBS, Jr., Defendant—Appellant.
No. 05-6516.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 9, 2005.
Decided: June 17, 2005.
Forest Gibbs, Jr., Appellant pro se.
Lee Ellis Berlinsky, Office of the United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Forest Gibbs, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.
When the United States or its officer or agency is a party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty days after the entry of the district court's final judgment or order, Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Dir., Dep't of Corr., 434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (1960)).
The district court's order was entered on the docket on July 9, 2004. The notice of appeal was filed on April 1, 2005. Because Gibbs failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
The envelope containing Gibbs' notice of appeal indicates that he delivered the notice to prison officials for mailing on April 1, 2005. See Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988).