Case Name: Frank J. BOLTRI, Petitioner, v. Harry K. SINGLETARY, Jr., et al., Respondents
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1999-02-15
Citations: 728 So. 2d 772
Docket Number: No. 98-3492
Parties: Frank J. BOLTRI, Petitioner, v. Harry K. SINGLETARY, Jr., et al., Respondents.
Judges: KAHN, BENTON, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 728
Pages: 772–772

Head Matter:
Frank J. BOLTRI, Petitioner, v. Harry K. SINGLETARY, Jr., et al., Respondents.
No. 98-3492
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Feb. 15, 1999.
Petitioner pro se.
No appearance for Respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Because petitioner has not demonstrated that the circuit court failed to afford him due process of law or departed from the essential requirements of law, we deny the petition. See Sheley v. State, 703 So.2d 1202 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), approved, 720 So.2d 216 (Fla.1998).
The proper remedy to correct a sentencing error is with the sentencing court, not a petition for writ of mandamus against the Florida Parole Commission and Department of Corrections. See Boyd v. State, 538 So.2d 517 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).
KAHN, BENTON, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.