Case Name: Gordon L. PERRYMAN and Edna H. Perryman, his wife, Appellants, v. Lawrence Ronald WARRICK, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1963-10-02
Citations: 156 So. 2d 539
Docket Number: No. 3711
Parties: Gordon L. PERRYMAN and Edna H. Perryman, his wife, Appellants, v. Lawrence Ronald WARRICK, Appellee.
Judges: KANNER, Acting C. J., and ALLEN and WHITE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 156
Pages: 539–540

Head Matter:
Gordon L. PERRYMAN and Edna H. Perryman, his wife, Appellants, v. Lawrence Ronald WARRICK, Appellee.
No. 3711.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.
Oct. 2, 1963.
Russell Troutman of Fishback, Davis, Dominick & Troutman, Orlando, for appellants.
Charles W. Abbott, of Maguire, Voorhis & Wells, Orlando, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
An intersection automobile collision gave rise to the suit entered below by plaintiffs, Gordon L. Perryman and Edna H. Perry-man, his wife, appellants, against Lawrence Ronald Warrick, defendant-appellee. The appeal is from the judgment entered consequent upon a jury verdict rendered in favor of defendant.
Sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury's verdict is not challenged, but the protest of appellants is directed against the trial court's rulings as to three jury instructions. One of these, given by the court, is complained of as having been inadequate; as to the other two, requested by appellants and rejected by the court, appellants contend that they should have been given.
We have studied the whole record, including all of the instructions, and do not find that reversible error has been committed. The judgment, therefore, is affirmed.
Affirmed.
KANNER, Acting C. J., and ALLEN and WHITE, JJ., concur.