Case Name: ROE REALTY COMPANY, RESPONDENT, v. SULZBACHER GRANGER & COMPANY, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1937-09-22
Citations: 118 N.J.L. 563
Docket Number: 
Parties: ROE REALTY COMPANY, RESPONDENT, v. SULZBACHER GRANGER & COMPANY, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 118
Pages: 563–563

Head Matter:
ROE REALTY COMPANY, RESPONDENT, v. SULZBACHER GRANGER & COMPANY, APPELLANT.
Submitted May 28, 1937
Decided September 22, 1937.
For the respondent, James A. McTague.
For the appellant, Collins & Corbin.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Lloyd, Perskie, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 8.
For reversal — The Chancellor, Parker, Case, Donges, JJ. 4.