Case Name: David Cohen, Respondent, v. Quartite Creative Corporation, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1968-02-29
Citations: 29 A.D.2d 758
Docket Number: 
Parties: David Cohen, Respondent, v. Quartite Creative Corporation, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 29
Pages: 758–758

Head Matter:
David Cohen, Respondent, v. Quartite Creative Corporation, Appellant.

Opinion:
Order entered on November 22, 1967, conditionally granting plaintiff's motion to preclude, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts and in the exercise of discretion, and the motion denied, without costs or disbursements. The inadequacies in the information furnished — and we find fewer than plaintiff asserts — seem to us more literal than substantial; and in our opinion contain no threat of prejudice to the prosecution of his case. In these circumstances, and in view of the availability of other forms of pretrial discovery (cf. Bawmgarten v. Lear, 26 A D 2d 932), prolonging this debate, with all its minutiae, regarding the sufficiency of particulars lacks practical justification. Concur — Botein, P. J., Eager, Capozzoli, Tilzer and McGivern, JJ.