Case Name: CLARK v. THE STATE
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1929-11-12
Citations: 40 Ga. App. 504
Docket Number: 19994
Parties: CLARK v. THE STATE.
Judges: Broyles; C. J., and Luhe, J., concur.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 40
Pages: 504–505

Head Matter:
19994.
CLARK v. THE STATE.
Decided November 12, 1929.
M. B. Huíanles, Norman Shattuclc, for plaintiff in error.
M. Neil Andrews, solicitor-general, contra.

Opinion:
Bloodworth, J.
This case is controlled by the principle announced in Cummings v. State, 25 Ga. App. 427 (103 S. E. 687), and the court erred in refusing to grant a new trial. See Turner v. State, 25 Ga. App. 234 (102 S. E. 847); Kennedy v. State, 23 Ga. App. 141 (97 S. E. 894); Reeves v. State, 23 Ga. App. 9 (97 S. E. 263).
As a new trial must follow the foregoing ruling, it is unnecessary to pass upon the allegéd errors referred to in the special grounds of the motion for a new trial.
Judgment reversed.
Broyles; C. J., and Luhe, J., concur.