Case Name: The HANLEY-MAPLEWOOD REDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Respondent, v. Thomas CARTER, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-05-09
Citations: 191 S.W.3d 680
Docket Number: No. ED 85756
Parties: The HANLEY-MAPLEWOOD REDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Respondent, v. Thomas CARTER, Appellant.
Judges: Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J. and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J. and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 191
Pages: 680–680

Head Matter:
The HANLEY-MAPLEWOOD REDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Respondent, v. Thomas CARTER, Appellant.
No. ED 85756.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
May 9, 2006.
Brian L. Harvell, LC, Clayton, MO, for appellant.
Carmody Macdonald, Gerard T. Carmo-dy, Kelley F. Farrell, Erwin 0. Switzer, III, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J. and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J. and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Thomas Carter (Carter) appeals from the trial court's judgment, entered in accordance with a jury verdict, in Carter's action seeking damages regarding property condemnation.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment in accordance with 84.16(b).