Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Robert Guy Dickinson, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2011-12-15
Citations: 18 N.Y.3d 835
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Guy Dickinson, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 18
Pages: 835–836

Head Matter:
[962 NE2d 257, 938 NYS2d 836]
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Guy Dickinson, Appellant.
Argued November 16, 2011;
decided December 15, 2011
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Robert M. Winn, Granville, for appellant.
Kevin C. Kortright, District Attorney, Fort Edward (Katherine G. Henley of counsel), for respondent.
New York State Defenders Association, Albany (Alfred O’Connor of counsel), for New York State Defenders Association, amicus curiae.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the indictment dismissed.
It is undisputed that the People were not ready for trial within six months of the commencement of the action, as CPL 30.30 (1) (a) requires, even after application of the exclusions listed in CPL 30.30 (4). The People's only claim is that defendant waived his rights under CPL 30.30 by participating in plea negotiations for several months.
While a defendant may waive rights under CPL 30.30 (People v Waldron, 6 NY3d 463 [2006]), the record here contains no evidence of any waiver, written or oral. Mere silence is not a waiver. We repeat our observation in Waldron that "prosecutors would be well advised to obtain unambiguous written waivers in situations like these" (id. at 468).
Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur in memorandum.
Order reversed, etc.