Case Name: Jerry Nathan PRUITT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael MOORE, Director of South Carolina Department of Corrections; Nathaniel Hughes; Ara Health Services; CMS; Dr. Kennedy; Doctor Alewine; Doctor Rentz; Doctor Gowan; Mr. Giddings; Mr. Lester; Ken McKellar; Mr. McCants; John King, Mr.; Mr. Cohen; Mr. Causey; Mr. Long; Albritan; Ms. Freeman; Correctional Officer Whitney; Levine; Ms. Oswald; Geraldine Miro, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-02-06
Citations: 86 F. App'x 615
Docket Number: No. 03-7149
Parties: Jerry Nathan PRUITT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael MOORE, Director of South Carolina Department of Corrections; Nathaniel Hughes; Ara Health Services; CMS; Dr. Kennedy; Doctor Alewine; Doctor Rentz; Doctor Gowan; Mr. Giddings; Mr. Lester; Ken McKellar; Mr. McCants; John King, Mr.; Mr. Cohen; Mr. Causey; Mr. Long; Albritan; Ms. Freeman; Correctional Officer Whitney; Levine; Ms. Oswald; Geraldine Miro, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 86
Pages: 615–616

Head Matter:
Jerry Nathan PRUITT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael MOORE, Director of South Carolina Department of Corrections; Nathaniel Hughes; Ara Health Services; CMS; Dr. Kennedy; Doctor Alewine; Doctor Rentz; Doctor Gowan; Mr. Giddings; Mr. Lester; Ken McKellar; Mr. McCants; John King, Mr.; Mr. Cohen; Mr. Causey; Mr. Long; Albritan; Ms. Freeman; Correctional Officer Whitney; Levine; Ms. Oswald; Geraldine Miro, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 03-7149.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 26, 2003.
Decided Feb. 6, 2004.
Jerry Nathan Pruitt, Appellant pro se. Christy Scott Stephens, Elbert Olivine Duffie, III, Robert Douglas Simmons Mel-lard, Bogoslow, Jones, Stephens & Duffie, P.A., Walterboro, South Carolina; James Miller Davis, Jr., Davidson, Morrison & Lindemann, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Jerry Nathan Pruitt appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Pruitt v. Moore, No. CA-02-395-3-24BC (D.S.C. July 9, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED