Case Name: JOHN W. KALPIN, T/A GENERAL FOUNDRY CO., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAXATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1984-01-18
Citations: 6 N.J. Tax 258
Docket Number: 
Parties: JOHN W. KALPIN, T/A GENERAL FOUNDRY CO., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAXATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Tax Court Reports
Volume: 6
Pages: 258–259

Head Matter:
JOHN W. KALPIN, T/A GENERAL FOUNDRY CO., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAXATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Submitted January 10, 1984
Decided January 18, 1984.
Before Judges BOTTER and PRESSLER.
Richard A. Koerner, for appellant.
Irwin I. Kimmelman, Attorney General of New Jersey, for respondent (James J. Ciancia, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Harley A. Williams, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Case below: 5 N.J.Tax 172.
The issue on this appeal is whether materials purchased by appellant which are used in his foundry operation, namely, sands, binders and washes, were exempt from taxation under the sales tax law by reason of the exemption provided in N.J.S.A. 54:32B-8.20. These materials do not become a component part of the finished product. Moreover, Tax Court Judge Andrew found from the evidence that the materials were not used "to induce or cause a refining or chemical process." As a result, Judge Andrew concluded that the exemption did not apply, and we agree.
The judgment below is supported by substantial credible evidence and must be affirmed. R. 2.11-3(e)(1)(A) and (E); Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Ins. Co., 65 N.J. 474, 483—484, 323 A.2d 495 (1974).
Affirmed.