Case Name: Harriet P. MERRICK, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF HIGHER EDUCATION and State of Oregon, Respondents
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1992-02-12
Citations: 111 Or. App. 414
Docket Number: CA A60997
Parties: Harriet P. MERRICK, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF HIGHER EDUCATION and State of Oregon, Respondents.
Judges: Before Rossman, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Riggs, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 111
Pages: 414–418

Head Matter:
On respondents’ motion to dismiss filed July 10, 1991,
motion to dismiss denied February 12, 1992
Harriet P. MERRICK, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF HIGHER EDUCATION and State of Oregon, Respondents.
(CA A60997)
823 P2d 1044
Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, for the motion.
Charles F. Hinkle, Edward J. Reeves, Glenn J. Hovemann and Stoel Rives Boley Jones & Grey, Portland, contra.
Before Rossman, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Riggs, Judges.
PER CURIAM
Edmonds, J., dissenting.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
The question in this case has already been answered by Merrick v. Board of Higher Education, 103 Or App 328, 797 P2d 388 (1990).
Motion to dismiss denied.