Case Name: A.O. Textile Inc., Appellant, v. Sep Plus Inc. et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2008-12-23
Citations: 57 A.D.3d 397
Docket Number: 
Parties: A.O. Textile Inc., Appellant, v Sep Plus Inc. et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 57
Pages: 397–397

Head Matter:
A.O. Textile Inc., Appellant, v Sep Plus Inc. et al., Respondents.
[868 NYS2d 892]

Opinion:
Plaintiff failed to establish as a matter of law that defendants either agreed with its statement of the balance of the indebtedness or admitted to owing a lesser amount (see Herrick, Feinstein v Stamm, 297 AD2d 477, 478 [2002]). Concur — Friedman, J.E, Sweeny, McGuire, Renwick and Freedman, JJ.