Case Name: Diego QUIROZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Mike McDONALD, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-09-24
Citations: 481 F. App'x 372
Docket Number: No. 11-17473
Parties: Diego QUIROZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Mike McDONALD, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 481
Pages: 372–372

Head Matter:
Diego QUIROZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Mike McDONALD, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 11-17473.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 10, 2012.
Filed Sept. 24, 2012.
Diego Quiroz, Vacaville, CA, pro se.
Gregory A. Ott, Deputy Attorney General, Office of the California Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, for Respondents Appellee.
Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
California state prisoner Diego Quiroz appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.
Quiroz contends that the he was denied his Sixth Amendment right to have a jury decide the facts supporting an upper term sentence. Because Quiroz did not file his notice of appeal within thirty days of the entry of judgment, we do not have jurisdiction over this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A); United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 937 (9th Cir.2007).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.