Case Name: CHARLES H. INGERSOLL, RESPONDENT, v. VILLAGE OF SOUTH ORANGE ET AL., APPELLANTS
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1925-09-29
Citations: 102 N.J.L. 218
Docket Number: 
Parties: CHARLES H. INGERSOLL, RESPONDENT, v. VILLAGE OF SOUTH ORANGE ET AL., APPELLANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 102
Pages: 218–219

Head Matter:
CHARLES H. INGERSOLL, RESPONDENT, v. VILLAGE OF SOUTH ORANGE ET AL., APPELLANTS.
Submitted May 29, 1925
Decided September 29, 1925.
For the appellants, Riker & Riker.
For the respondent, Howe & Davis.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment appealed from 'will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Katzenbach, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.