Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Ervin MARTIN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-06-29
Citations: 328 F. App'x 217
Docket Number: No. 09-4183
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. James Ervin MARTIN, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 328
Pages: 217–217

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. James Ervin MARTIN, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 09-4183.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 22, 2009.
Decided: June 29, 2009.
James Ervin Martin, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen David Schiller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James Ervin Martin appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the recoi'd and find no i-eversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Martin, No. 3:03-cr-00330-REP-6 (E.D.Va. Jan. 27, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.