Case Name: Robert COKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Warden Larry POWERS; Spartanburg County Detention Center; Officer Greer, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-10-05
Citations: 396 F. App'x 912
Docket Number: No. 10-6520
Parties: Robert COKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Warden Larry POWERS; Spartanburg County Detention Center; Officer Greer, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 396
Pages: 912–912

Head Matter:
Robert COKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Warden Larry POWERS; Spartanburg County Detention Center; Officer Greer, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 10-6520.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 28, 2010.
Decided: Oct. 5, 2010.
Robert Coker, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Robert Coker seeks to appeal the district court's order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Coker's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint against one of the Defendants. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Coker seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and deny Coker's motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.