Case Name: TERMINAL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Appellant, v. Conrad J. DeSANTIS and Lillian Dinallo, as Personal Representatives of the Estate of Richard N. Dinallo, and Heller & Laiks, P.A., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-02-10
Citations: 614 So. 2d 7
Docket Number: No. 92-0680
Parties: TERMINAL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Appellant, v. Conrad J. DeSANTIS and Lillian Dinallo, as Personal Representatives of the Estate of Richard N. Dinallo, and Heller & Laiks, P.A., Appellees.
Judges: STONE, J., concurs.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 614
Pages: 7–8

Head Matter:
TERMINAL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Appellant, v. Conrad J. DeSANTIS and Lillian Dinallo, as Personal Representatives of the Estate of Richard N. Dinallo, and Heller & Laiks, P.A., Appellees.
No. 92-0680.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb. 10, 1993.
Certification and/or Rehearing Denied March 17, 1993.
Mark F. Bideau and Bridget Ann Berry of Greenberg, Traurig, Hoffman, Lipoff, Rosen & Quentel, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.
W. Jay Hunston, Jr. and Kathleen G. Kozinski of DeSantis, Cook & Hunston, Jupiter, for appellee-Conrad J. DeSantis. James G. Pressly of Pressly & Pressly, West Palm Beach, for appellee-Lillian Dinallo.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Metro Indusial. Painting Corp. v. Terminal Construction Co., 287 F.2d 382, 384 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 817, 82 S.Ct. 31, 7 L.Ed.2d 24 (1961); Acton CATV, Inc. v. Wildwood Partners, Ltd., 508 So.2d 1274 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 518 So.2d 1273 (1987); Riverfront Properties, Ltd. v. Max Factor III, 460 So.2d 948 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).
STONE, J., concurs.
ANSTEAD, J., concurs specially with opinion.
LETTS, J., concurs in conclusion only.