Case Name: The Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, Appellant, v. Vincenza Marendino, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1922-06
Citations: 202 A.D. 812
Docket Number: Appeal No. 2
Parties: The Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, Appellant, v. Vincenza Marendino, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 202
Pages: 812–812

Head Matter:
The Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, Appellant, v. Vincenza Marendino, Respondent.
(Appeal No. 2.)

Opinion:
We think the answer raises an issue as to the subject-matter of the indemnity agreement. It may be that on the trial the plaintiff can show that the indemnitors intended the agreement to apply to the bond in the County Court. Order denying plaintiff's motion for summary judgment affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Rich, Kelly, Jaycox and Young, JJ., concur; Blackmar, P. J., concurs in the result.
See Rules of Civil Practice, rule 113.-[Rep.