Case Name: E.W., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-10-31
Citations: 550 So. 2d 1182
Docket Number: No. 88-625
Parties: E.W., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before NESBITT, BASKIN and COPE, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 550
Pages: 1182–1182

Head Matter:
E.W., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 88-625.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 31, 1989.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Elliot H. Scherker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Charles M. Fahlbusch, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before NESBITT, BASKIN and COPE, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The trial court acted within the bounds of sound discretion in excluding certain of respondent's statements which had not been disclosed to the defense in discovery. Other statements about which respondent complains were actually made known to the defense in pretrial deposition. The procedure followed by the trial court was consistent with Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d 771 (Fla.1971).
Affirmed.