Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Alberto SANCHEZ-AVILES, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-10-24
Citations: 670 F. App'x 232
Docket Number: No. 16-40078 Summary Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Alberto SANCHEZ-AVILES, Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before JOLLY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 670
Pages: 232–232

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Alberto SANCHEZ-AVILES, Defendant-Appellant
No. 16-40078 Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Date Filed: 10/24/2016
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Alberto Sanchez-Aviles, Pro Se
Before JOLLY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Alberto Sanchez-Aviles has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Sanchez-Aviles has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Sanchez-Aviles's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the. record reflected therein, as well as Sanchez-Aviles's response. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivo-lous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.