Case Name: James W. HILL, Appellant, v. CITY OF CASTLE HILLS, Texas, Appellee
Court: Texas Courts of Civil Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1955-03-23
Citations: 282 S.W.2d 891
Docket Number: No. 12803
Parties: James W. HILL, Appellant, v. CITY OF CASTLE HILLS, Texas, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 282
Pages: 891–891

Head Matter:
James W. HILL, Appellant, v. CITY OF CASTLE HILLS, Texas, Appellee.
No. 12803.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.
March 23, 1955.
Rehearing Denied April 20, 1955.
Harrison & Smallwood, Ronald Small-wood, San Antonio, for appellant.
Bobbitt, Brite & Bobbitt, San Antonio, for appellee.

Opinion:
POPE, Justice.
The trial court, after hearing, temporarily enjoined appellant from using certain property in Castle Hills for business purposes, since the property was zoned for residential uses only. Appellant urges .that the penal provision of the ordinance affords the sole instrument for enforcement, that, it is an adequate remedy, and the injunction should not have been granted.
The judgment is affirmed, since Article lOllh, Vernon's Ann.Civ.Stats., authorizes the remedy by way of injunction. City of Corpus Christi v. Jones, Tex.Civ.App., 144 S.W.2d 388, 401.
Affirmed.