Case Name: Rolando GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1999-11-24
Citations: 744 So. 2d 1253
Docket Number: No. 99-1468
Parties: Rolando GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before JORGENSON, LEVY, and GREEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 744
Pages: 1253–1253

Head Matter:
Rolando GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 99-1468.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 24, 1999.
Rolando Gonzalez, in proper person.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Lara J. Edelstein, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before JORGENSON, LEVY, and GREEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We find that all of the issues raised by the appellant in his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 8.850 are issues which were, should have, and/or could have been raised on his direct appeal to this court and therefore, is not properly cognizable in a rule 3.850. See Harvey v. Dugger, 656 So.2d 1258 (Fla.1995); Jackson v. State, 646 So.2d 792 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). Thus, we conclude that the trial court properly denied the appellant's motion.
Affirmed.