Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Julio Borrell, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2015-05-27
Citations: 128 A.D.3d 1085
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Julio Borrell, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 128
Pages: 1085–1085

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Julio Borrell, Appellant.
[8 NYS3d 602]

Opinion:
Appeal by the defendant from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (McGann, J.), dated June 10, 2010, as denied, without a hearing, that branch of his motion which was pursuant to CPL 440.30 (1-a) for DNA testing of certain evidence.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from.
The Supreme Court properly denied, without a hearing, that branch of the defendant's motion which was pursuant to CPL 440.30 (1-a) for DNA testing of certain evidence, since the defendant failed to show that there was a reasonable probability that the verdict would have been more favorable to him had the DNA tests been performed and the results admitted at trial (see CPL 440.30 [1-a] [a] [1]; People v Bellezza, 119 AD3d 598, 598-599 [2014]; People v Johnson, 112 AD3d 969, 969-970 [2013]; People v Perry, 89 AD3d 1114, 1115 [2011]).
The defendant's remaining contentions, raised in his pro se supplemental brief, are not properly raised on this appeal (see CPL 450.10). Mastro, J.P., Sgroi, Cohen and Duffy, JJ., concur.