Case Name: In the Matter of Vito J. Settineri et al., Respondents, v. Robert J. DiCarlo et al., Appellants, et al., Respondents. Arthur Bramwell, Proposed Intervener. (Proceeding No. 1.); In the Matter of Phillip A. Donohue et al., Respondents, v. Robert J. DiCarlo et al., Appellants, et al., Respondents. Arthur Bramwell, Proposed Intervenor. (Proceeding No. 2.)
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1993-11-01
Citations: 82 N.Y.2d 813
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Vito J. Settineri et al., Respondents, v Robert J. DiCarlo et al., Appellants, et al., Respondents. Arthur Bramwell, Proposed Intervener. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Phillip A. Donohue et al., Respondents, v Robert J. DiCarlo et al., Appellants, et al., Respondents. Arthur Bramwell, Proposed Intervenor. (Proceeding No. 2.)
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 82
Pages: 813–818

Head Matter:
[624 NE2d 683, 604 NYS2d 546]
In the Matter of Vito J. Settineri et al., Respondents, v Robert J. DiCarlo et al., Appellants, et al., Respondents. Arthur Bramwell, Proposed Intervener. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Phillip A. Donohue et al., Respondents, v Robert J. DiCarlo et al., Appellants, et al., Respondents. Arthur Bramwell, Proposed Intervenor. (Proceeding No. 2.)
Submitted October 28, 1993;
decided November 1, 1993
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Robert S. Meyers, Brooklyn, for appellants.
Dorn & Corley, P. C, Brooklyn (Aaron D. Maslow of counsel), for Vito J. Settineri and others, respondents.
Rosenthal, Vallarlo, Leventhal & Coffinas, Brooklyn (John M. Leventhal of counsel), for Phillip A. Donohue and others, respondents.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order reversed, without costs, and petitions dismissed for reasons stated in the dissenting in part in memorandum of Justice Vincent R. Balletta at the Appellate Division (197 AD2d 724, 726).
Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Hancock, Jr., Bellacosa and Levine. Judge Smith dissents and votes to confirm in an opinion.