Case Name: Richard Vandenburg, Appellant, v. Timothy Brosnan et al., Defendants, and Southland Corp., Doing Business as Seven-Eleven, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1988-01-14
Citations: 70 N.Y.2d 940
Docket Number: 
Parties: Richard Vandenburg, Appellant, v Timothy Brosnan et al., Defendants, and Southland Corp., Doing Business as Seven-Eleven, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 70
Pages: 940–942

Head Matter:
Richard Vandenburg, Appellant, v Timothy Brosnan et al., Defendants, and Southland Corp., Doing Business as Seven-Eleven, Respondent.
Argued January 8, 1988;
decided January 14, 1988
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Irving N. Selkin and Morris Honig for appellant.
David S. Heller for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (129 AD2d 793). We note in addition, with respect to plaintiffs claim of common-law negligence, that the principles applied by the Appellate Division were recently reaffirmed by this court (see, D'Amico v Christie, 71 NY2d 76).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.