Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Frederick Francis Heavy RUNNER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-07-27
Citations: 192 F. App'x 657
Docket Number: No. 05-30006
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Frederick Francis Heavy RUNNER, Defendant — Appellant.
Judges: Before: ALARCÓN, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 192
Pages: 657–658

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Frederick Francis Heavy RUNNER, Defendant — Appellant.
No. 05-30006.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 24, 2006.
Filed July 27, 2006.
Lori Harper Suek, Esq., USBI-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Billings, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
John P. Rhodes, Esq., FDMT-Federal Defenders of Montana (Missoula), Missoula, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: ALARCÓN, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Frederick Francis Heavy Runner appeals from the 24-month term of imprisonment imposed upon the revocation of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Heavy Runner contends that the revocation of his supervised release term and the imposition of additional imprisonment violates the Sixth Amendment under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), and United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). This contention is foreclosed by United States v. Huerta-Pimental, 445 F.3d 1220, 1223-25 (9th Cir.2006).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.