Case Name: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THOMAS B. KING, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1971-12-13
Citations: 59 N.J. 525
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THOMAS B. KING, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 59
Pages: 525–525

Head Matter:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THOMAS B. KING, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Argued December 7, 1971
Decided December 13, 1971.
Mr. Joseph A. Fusco, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Joseph P. Lordi, Essex County-Prosecutor, attorney).
Mr. Piar tin L. Greenberg argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Stamley G. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney; Mr. Philip Freedman, on the brief).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed for the reasons expressed in its opinion. (112 N. J. Super. 138)
For affirmance: Chief Justice Weintraub and .Justices Jacobs, Proctor, Halt, and Schettino—5.
For reversal: None.