Case Name: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Eacret
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1986-07-23
Citations: 25 Ohio St. 3d 132
Docket Number: D.D. No. 86-5
Parties: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Eacret.
Judges: Celebrezze, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 25
Pages: 132–134

Head Matter:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Eacret.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Eacret (1986), 25 Ohio St. 3d 132.]
(D.D. No. 86-5
Decided July 23, 1986.)
Angelo J. Gagliardo, disciplinary counsel, and Carl J. Corletzi, for relator.
Keith McNamara, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This court finds that respondent has violated DR 1-102(A)(1), a lawyer shall not violate a Disciplinary Rule; DR 1-102(A)(3), a lawyer shall not engage in illegal conduct involving moral turpitude; and DR 1-102(A)(6), a lawyer shall not engage in any other conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness to practice law.
We concur in the board's conclusion regarding the appropriate sanction. Therefore, it is the order of this court that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the state of Ohio.
Judgment accordingly.
Celebrezze, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.