Case Name: Luis MUNOZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-06-09
Citations: 599 So. 2d 283
Docket Number: No. 91-871
Parties: Luis MUNOZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and HUBBART, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 599
Pages: 283–283

Head Matter:
Luis MUNOZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 91-871.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
June 9, 1992.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Bruce A. Rosenthal, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Avi J. Litwin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and HUBBART, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The sole point on appeal from the appellant's conviction for trafficking in cocaine concerns an alleged Richardson violation. The record shows that the state committed no violation of its discovery obligations; thus, no requirement of a Richardson inquiry ever arose. See Palmer v. State, 483 So.2d 496 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), review denied, 494 So.2d 1152 (Fla.1986); Denny v. State, 404 So.2d 824 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).
Affirmed.