Case Name: STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Scott E. McFARLAND, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2003-10-03
Citations: 884 So. 2d 957
Docket Number: No. 1D02-4238
Parties: STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Scott E. McFARLAND, Appellee.
Judges: WOLF, C.J., and BROWNING, J., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 884
Pages: 957–957

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Scott E. McFARLAND, Appellee.
No. 1D02-4238.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Oct. 3, 2003.
Rehearing Denied Sept. 28, 2004.
Charlie Crist, Attorney General and Thomas H. Duffy, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender and Robert S. Friedman, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
HAWKES, J.
The State of Florida filed a petition to civilly commit Appellee, Scott E. McFarland (McFarland) as a violent sexual predator upon his release from prison. McFarland filed a motion for summary judgment alleging the relief the State sought in the petition violated the terms of his plea agreement. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of McFarland. In so doing, the trial court erred.
Pursuant to sections 394.910-394.931, Florida Statutes (2000) (the Jimmy Ryce Act), a person who is declared a sexually violent predator may be committed to the Department of Children and Families for care, custody, and treatment. A sex offender's involuntary civil commitment as a sexually violent predator under the Jimmy Ryce Act is not continued punishment for his criminal offense, and thus does not violate an offender's due process right to specific performance of his plea agreement. See Murray v. Regier, 872 So.2d 217 (Fla. 2002). Any bargain a defendant may strike in a plea agreement in a criminal case has no bearing , on a subsequent involuntary civil commitment for control, care, and treatment. See id; see also Sandillo v. State, 842 So.2d 1018, 1019 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); Krischer v. Faris, 838 So.2d 600, 603 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).
REVERSED.
WOLF, C.J., and BROWNING, J., concur.