Case Name: Bourak Contracting Co., Inc., Appellant, v. J. Wilson Dayton, Respondent.
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1934-06
Citations: 242 A.D. 649
Docket Number: 
Parties: Bourak Contracting Co., Inc., Appellant, v. J. Wilson Dayton, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 242
Pages: 649–650

Head Matter:
Bourak Contracting Co., Inc., Appellant, v. J. Wilson Dayton, Respondent.

Opinion:
Order modified by striking therefrom all provisions settling or referring to the defendant's account and all requirements as to notice to the persons therein named, and also by striking therefrom the provisions construing the agreement of agency, and, as so modified, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant. In our opinion the provisions of the order settling the defendant's account and requiring notice to the persons therein named and also construing the agency agreement were manifestly improper. No such relief can be awarded to the defendant except after a trial and pursuant to a judgment. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.