Case Name: State, ex rel., DeWeaver, appellant v. Faust et al., Board of Examiners of Plumbers of City of Dayton, appellees
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1965-03-01
Citations: 30 Ohio L.R. 61
Docket Number: 38693
Parties: State, ex rel., DeWeaver, appellant v. Faust et al., Board of Examiners of Plumbers of City of Dayton, appellees.
Judges: Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert and Brown, JJ., concur.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Reporter; a weekly journal published in the interest of the legal profession in the state of Ohio
Volume: 30
Pages: 61–62

Head Matter:
Announced Wednesday, February 24.
38693.
State, ex rel., DeWeaver, appellant v. Faust et al., Board of Examiners of Plumbers of City of Dayton, appellees.

Opinion:
Schneider, Judge.
Sections 2506.01 to 2506.04, inclusive, Revised Code, afford an adequate remedy at law by way of appeal from a final order, adjudication or decision of an administrative board, so that the writ of prohibition will not issue at the instance of a party who alleges irregularities in the proceedings of such a board and an ticipates that such a board will deprive him of procedural and substantive rights.
Judgment affirmed.
Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O'Neill, Herbert and Brown, JJ., concur.