Case Name: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DOUGLAS ZOLD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1970-04-24
Citations: 110 N.J. Super. 33
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DOUGLAS ZOLD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 110
Pages: 33–33

Head Matter:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DOUGLAS ZOLD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued April 13, 1970
Decided April 24, 1970
Before Judges Coneorb, Collester and Kolovsky.
Mr. Daniel R. Coburn, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause fur appellant (Mr. Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney).
Mr. Robert L. Messick, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. A. Donald Bigley, Camden County Prosecutor, attorney).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons given by Judge Peel in his opinion denying post-conviction relief. 105 N. J. Super. 194 (Law Div. 1969).
All 'other questions raised are concluded against defendant by the opinion (unreported) of this court affirming the conviction on the direct appeal.
Judgment affirmed.