Case Name: Grace MAKAU, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louise MEYER, District Court Judge; Kris Bailey, District Court Judge; Vince Rozier, District Court Judge; Erin Graber, District Court Judge; Christine M. Walzyk, District Court Judge; Beverly Scarlett, District Court Judge; Joe M. Buckner, District Court Judge; Lunsford Long, District Court Judge; Paige Vernon, District Court Judge, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-06-22
Citations: 691 F. App'x 781
Docket Number: No. 17-1154
Parties: Grace MAKAU, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louise MEYER, District Court Judge; Kris Bailey, District Court Judge; Vince Rozier, District Court Judge; Erin Graber, District Court Judge; Christine M. Walzyk, District Court Judge; Beverly Scarlett, District Court Judge; Joe M. Buckner, District Court Judge; Lunsford Long, District Court Judge; Paige Vernon, District Court Judge, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 691
Pages: 781–781

Head Matter:
Grace MAKAU, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louise MEYER, District Court Judge; Kris Bailey, District Court Judge; Vince Rozier, District Court Judge; Erin Graber, District Court Judge; Christine M. Walzyk, District Court Judge; Beverly Scarlett, District Court Judge; Joe M. Buckner, District Court Judge; Lunsford Long, District Court Judge; Paige Vernon, District Court Judge, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 17-1154
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 20, 2017
Decided: June 22, 2017
Japheth N. Matemu, MATEMU LAW OFFICE P.C., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant.
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Grace Makau appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her civil complaint as frivolous and for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed Makau's appellate brief and the record on appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Makau v. Meyer, No. 1:16-cv-01346-TDS-JEP, 2017 WL 435808 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 1, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED