Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Terry L. DOWDELL, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-04-07
Citations: 272 F. App'x 262
Docket Number: No. 07-7779
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Terry L. DOWDELL, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 272
Pages: 262–263

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Terry L. DOWDELL, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 07-7779.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 20, 2008.
Decided: April 7, 2008.
Terry L. Dowdell, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Barrett Hudson, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Terry L. Dowdell seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.
When the United States or its officer or agency is a party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty days after the entry of the district court's final judgment or order, Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. RApp. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Dir., Dep't of Corr., 434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S. Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (1960)).
The district court's order was entered on the docket on September 20, 2007. The notice of appeal was filed on November 20, 2007. Because Dowdell failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal filed by Dowdell is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R.App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988).