Case Name: Gertrude Ullrich, complainant-respondent, v. Joseph Ullrich, defendant-appellant
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1948-09-03
Citations: 142 N.J. Eq. 734
Docket Number: 
Parties: Gertrude Ullrich, complainant-respondent, v. Joseph Ullrich, defendant-appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 142
Pages: 734–734

Head Matter:
Gertrude Ullrich, complainant-respondent, v. Joseph Ullrich, defendant-appellant.
[Submitted May term, 1948.
Decided September 3d, 1948.]
Mr. Samuel F. Penza, for the complainant-respondent.
Mr. Simon M. Seley (Mr. Charles M. Grossman, of counsel), for the defendant-appellant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Our examination of the record and consideration of the various points submitted on appeal lead us to the conclusion that the decree under review should be affirmed. The decree is affirmed.
For affirmance — -The Chiee-Justice, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Colie, Wacheneeld, Eastwood, Burling, Jacobs, Wells, Dill, Ereund, McLean, Schettino, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.