Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Enrique GONZALEZ-MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-08-28
Citations: 17 F. App'x 646
Docket Number: No. 00-10265; D.C. No. CR 00-00112-RGS
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Enrique GONZALEZ-MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 17
Pages: 646–647

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Enrique GONZALEZ-MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 00-10265.
D.C. No. CR 00-00112-RGS.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 13, 2001.
Decided Aug. 28, 2001.
Before HAWKINS, TASHIMA and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Enrique Gonzalez-Martinez appeals his 54-month sentence and conviction by guilty plea to a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1826. Gonzalez-Martinez's attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 886 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating that she finds no viable issues to raise on Gonzalez's behalf. Gonzalez did not file a pro se supplemental brief.
Because Gonzalez-Martinez knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal and was sentenced within the terms of the plea agreement, we lack jurisdiction to consider his appeal. United States v. Martinez, 143 F.3d 1266, 1270-72 (9th Cir. 1998) (enforcing waiver of right to appeal where waiver is knowing and voluntary and sentence is in accordance with plea agreement). Accordingly counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the appeal is DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.