Case Name: August WALKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-05-15
Citations: 9 F. App'x 154
Docket Number: No. 00-2409
Parties: August WALKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 9
Pages: 154–154

Head Matter:
August WALKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 00-2409.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 30, 2001.
Decided May 15, 2001.
John M. Clifford, Peter F. Butcher, Clifford, Lyons & Garde, Washington, DC, for appellant.
R. Mark Dare, Jennifer J. Dacey, Reed, Smith, Hazel & Thomas, L.L .P., Falls Church, VA, for appellee.
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
August Walker appeals the district court's order granting Lockheed Martin Corporation's motion for summary judgment in this employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. We note in particular that Walker legally suffered no adverse employment action. See Boone v. Goldin, 178 F.3d 253, 255-56 (4th Cir.1999); Page v. Bolger, 645 F.2d 227, 233 (4th Cir.1981) (en banc). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Walker v. Lockheed Martin Corp., No. CA-00-1263 (E.D.Va. Sept. 29, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.