Case Name: Mae Smith, Formerly Mae Griffith, Respondent, v. Trepel Florist, Inc., Defendant, and A. I. Namm & Son, Inc., Sued Herein as A. I. Namm Company, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1930-12
Citations: 231 A.D. 844
Docket Number: 
Parties: Mae Smith, Formerly Mae Griffith, Respondent, v. Trepel Florist, Inc., Defendant, and A. I. Namm & Son, Inc., Sued Herein as A. I. Namm Company, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 231
Pages: 844–844

Head Matter:
Mae Smith, Formerly Mae Griffith, Respondent, v. Trepel Florist, Inc., Defendant, and A. I. Namm & Son, Inc., Sued Herein as A. I. Namm Company, Appellant.

Opinion:
Judgment against appellant, A. I. Namm & Son, Inc., reversed upon the law and the facts, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs, upon the ground that plaintiff failed to establish a cause of action against said appell nt. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.