Case Name: Philip McCLINTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2004-12-10
Citations: 889 So. 2d 919
Docket Number: No. 2D04-2779
Parties: Philip McCLINTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SILBERMAN, CANADY, and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 889
Pages: 919–919

Head Matter:
Philip McCLINTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D04-2779.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Dec. 10, 2004.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Philip McClinton challenges the trial court's order denying his motion for post-conviction DNA testing pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853. We affirm the trial court's denial of the motion on the ground that it is facially insufficient. Our affirmance is without prejudice to any right McClinton might have to file a facially sufficient rule 3.853 motion within sixty days from the date of the issuance of the mandate in this case. See Saffold v. State, 850 So.2d 574 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).
SILBERMAN, CANADY, and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.