Case Name: Daniel T. Monohan, Jr., Respondent, v. Herbert M. Bergamini, Defendant, and Mahlon H. Atkinson, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1965-06-07
Citations: 24 A.D.2d 522
Docket Number: 
Parties: Daniel T. Monohan, Jr., Respondent, v. Herbert M. Bergamini, Defendant, and Mahlon H. Atkinson, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 24
Pages: 522–523

Head Matter:
(June 7, 1965)
Daniel T. Monohan, Jr., Respondent, v. Herbert M. Bergamini, Defendant, and Mahlon H. Atkinson, Appellant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam,
Appeal by-defendant, from a judgment of the- Supreme Court entered, upon. the. verdict of a jury in. a. malpractice action. The issues of the. defendant's alleged malpractice and of proximate, causation of the plaintiff's injuries, by the. malpractice alleged presented questions, of fact- which properly were, submitted to. the jury. The verdict was not against the weight o£ the evidence and, while substantial in amount, was not excessive in relation to the damages sustained. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Herlihy, J. P., Reynolds, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.