Case Name: DENNIS L. ADKINS v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 2005-03-29
Citations: 88 Conn. App. 901
Docket Number: AC 24972
Parties: DENNIS L. ADKINS v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Appellate Reports
Volume: 88
Pages: 901–901

Head Matter:
DENNIS L. ADKINS v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION
(AC 24972)
Lavery, C. J., and Schaller and Hennessy, Js.
Submitted on briefs February 24
officially released March 29, 2005

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
After careful review of the record and briefs, we conclude that the petitioner has not demonstrated that the issues are debatable among jurists of reason, that a court could resolve the issues in a different manner or that the questions raised deserve encouragement to proceed further. See Lozada v. Deeds, 498 U.S. 430, 431-32, 111 S. Ct. 860, 112 L. Ed. 2d 956 (1991); Simms v. Warden, 230 Conn. 608, 616, 646 A.2d 126 (1994).
The appeal is dismissed.