Case Name: Clarke et al. v. Threlkeld
Court: United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1823-04
Citations: 2 Cranch 408
Docket Number: 
Parties: Clarke et al. v. Threlkeld.
Judges: 
Reporter: Reports of cases argued and determined in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia (District of Columbia - reported by Mackey)
Volume: 2
Pages: 408–408

Head Matter:
Clarke et al. v. Threlkeld.
A cause in equity, in this Court, may be reheard if the petition for rehearing be filed before the end of the next term after the final decree, and if no appeal lies to the Supreme Court in that cause. »
This was a bill filed against Mr. Threlkeld, and others, to obtain the conveyance of a lot in Georgetown, to the complainants, in consequence of the deed, formerly made by Mr. Threlkeld to the ancestor of the complainants, of the same lot, having been lost before it was recorded. Mr. Threlkeld had no interest in the cause, and did not oppose the prayer of the bill.
At June term, 1822, the Court decreed that he should convey the lot to the complainants, and pay the costs. At the next term (October term, 1822,)
Mr. Taney for the defendant,
contended that the decree ought not to have been for costs.
Mr., Key, contra,
waived the formality of a petition for rehearing, and now, at this term (April term, 1823,) consented that the Court should consider the case as if the petition had been filed at October term, 1822. ' By the 31st rule of the equity practice of the courts of the United States, as prescribed by the Supreme Court, it'is declared, that if no appeal lies to the Supreme Court, a rehearing may be granted, at the discretion of the Court, at any time before the end of the next term after the final decree shall have been entered and recorded.
The value of the lot decreed to be conveyed does not appear in the papers in the cause, but was supposed to be of less value than $1000, so that it was a cause in which there could be no appeal to the Supreme Court.

Opinion:
The Court,
under these circumstances, was of opinion (Mor-sell, J., contra,) that they had now a right to rehear the cause: and upon the rehearing, they ordered so much of the decree to be rescinded as regarded costs.