Case Name: Mark J. ABRAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, a Municipality; City of Rancho Palos Verdes City Council, Defendants-Appellees, and Frank Lyon; Jon Cartwright; Thomas Long; Craig Mueller; Theodore Paulson; Donald Vannorsdall; John Mctaggart; Douglas W. Stern; Lee Byrd; Barbara Ferraro; Marilyn Lyon; and Larry Clark, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-05-05
Citations: 406 F.3d 1094
Docket Number: No. 02-55681
Parties: Mark J. ABRAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, a Municipality; City of Rancho Palos Verdes City Council, Defendants-Appellees, and Frank Lyon; Jon Cartwright; Thomas Long; Craig Mueller; Theodore Paulson; Donald Vannorsdall; John Mctaggart; Douglas W. Stern; Lee Byrd; Barbara Ferraro; Marilyn Lyon; and Larry Clark, Defendants.
Judges: Before KOZINSKI and NELSON, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI, Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 406
Pages: 1094–1095

Head Matter:
Mark J. ABRAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, a Municipality; City of Rancho Palos Verdes City Council, Defendants-Appellees, and Frank Lyon; Jon Cartwright; Thomas Long; Craig Mueller; Theodore Paulson; Donald Vannorsdall; John Mctaggart; Douglas W. Stern; Lee Byrd; Barbara Ferraro; Marilyn Lyon; and Larry Clark, Defendants.
No. 02-55681.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 5, 2005.
Wilkie Cheong, Cheong, Denove, Rowell, Aitablin & Bennett Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Christopher D. Imlay, Silver Spring, MD, T. Peter Pierce, Richards, Watson and Gershon, Los Angeles, CA, for Defen-dantr-Appellee.
Before KOZINSKI and NELSON, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI, Judge.
The Honorable Jane A. Restani, Chief Judge, United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
ORDER
The judgment of this court, Abrams v. City of Rancho Palos Verdes, 354 F.3d 1094 (9th Cir.2004), was reversed and the case remanded for further proceedings consistent with the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States. — U.S. —, 125 S.Ct. 1453, 161 L.Ed.2d 316 (2005).
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Costs to Appellees.