Case Name: Bradley Shane SHEPPARD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN OF FCI ESTILL, Respondent-Appellee, and United States of America, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-08-02
Citations: 474 F. App'x 976
Docket Number: No. 12-6603
Parties: Bradley Shane SHEPPARD, Petitioner—Appellant, v. WARDEN OF FCI ESTILL, Respondent—Appellee, and United States of America, Respondent.
Judges: Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 474
Pages: 976–977

Head Matter:
Bradley Shane SHEPPARD, Petitioner—Appellant, v. WARDEN OF FCI ESTILL, Respondent—Appellee, and United States of America, Respondent.
No. 12-6603.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 26, 2012.
Decided: Aug. 2, 2012.
Bradley Shane Sheppard, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Bradley Shane Sheppard, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order construing his post-judgment motion as a Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for relief from the district court's order dismissing his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sheppard v. Warden of FCI Estill, No. 1:10-cv-03220-RMG (D.S.C. Mar. 19, 2012). Further, we deny Sheppard's motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.