Case Name: Fury versus Stone
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1792
Citations: 2 Dall. 184
Docket Number: 
Parties: Fury versus Stone.
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 2
Pages: 184–184

Head Matter:
Fury versus Stone.
THE plaintiff laid his damages at £500 ; but the verdict and judgment nisi were for £672 13 2. The defendant hereupon took out a writ of error, and next day the plaintiff moved for leave to enter a remittitur of the surplus damages, upon the authority of H. Blacks. Rep. 643. 1 Dall. Rep. 134. Todd opposed it.

Opinion:
But;
by the Court:
—There is no difference between this case and that in Blackstone's Reports. We shall always be disposed to favor amendments. Let the remittitur be entered, upon payment of the costs of the writ of error.