Case Name: Shirley Countreyman, Plaintiff, v. Nancy Miller et al., Appellants, and Charles Bruyn, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1983-07-25
Citations: 96 A.D.2d 568
Docket Number: 
Parties: Shirley Countreyman, Plaintiff, v Nancy Miller et al., Appellants, and Charles Bruyn, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 96
Pages: 568–569

Head Matter:
Shirley Countreyman, Plaintiff, v Nancy Miller et al., Appellants, and Charles Bruyn, Respondent.

Opinion:
— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendants Nancy and Louis Miller appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Gurahian, J.), dated July 6,1982, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the cross claim of defendant Bruyn. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Ambiguities in the contract present triable issues of fact as to the intent of the parties. Therefore, summary judgment was properly denied (see Kalmon Dolgin Co. v Walnut Lanes, 27 AD2d 843). Mollen, P. J., Titone, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.