Case Name: WRIGHT v. THE STATE
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1995-03-06
Citations: 216 Ga. App. 486
Docket Number: A94A2456
Parties: WRIGHT v. THE STATE.
Judges: Pope, P. J., and Smith, J., concur.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 216
Pages: 486–487

Head Matter:
A94A2456.
WRIGHT v. THE STATE.
(455 SE2d 88)

Opinion:
McMurray, Presiding Judge.
Defendant was tried before a jury and found guilty of incest, rape and aggravated sodomy. This appeal followed the denial of defendant's motion for new trial. Held:
1. Defendant first contends the trial court erred in admitting incriminating statements he uttered in the presence of a law enforcement officer after he refused the officer's requests for defendant to execute a form indicating waiver of his rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 (86 SC 1602, 16 LE2d 694). This enumeration provides no grounds for reversal as any error in admission of these statements was not only cumulative of other admissible evidence, it is harmless because of overwhelming evidence of defendant's guilt. McLendon v. State, 259 Ga. 778, 780 (4) (387 SE2d 133).
2. Defendant complains in enumerations 3 and 4 that the trial court erred in refusing to allow the testimony of two witnesses (defendant's son and his brother) as to the victim's motive for accusing defendant of committing the crimes charged. In his third enumeration, defendant contends the trial court "erred in refusing to admit into evidence testimony of defendant as to the diagnosis of his own illness." These enumerations present nothing for review as defendant failed to proffer the testimony which was allegedly improperly excluded by the trial court. Harris v. State, 263 Ga. 526, 527 (1) (435 SE2d 669).
Decided March 6, 1995.
Ernest C. Tubbs, Jr., for appellant.
Ralph L. Van Pelt, Jr., District Attorney, Melodie S. Bedford, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.
Judgment affirmed.
Pope, P. J., and Smith, J., concur.