Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Diogenes ASCENCIO-LEMUS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-08-16
Citations: 438 F. App'x 270
Docket Number: No. 10-41110
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Diogenes ASCENCIO-LEMUS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 438
Pages: 270–271

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Diogenes ASCENCIO-LEMUS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-41110
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 16, 2011.
James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, H. Michael Sokolow, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendanb-Appellant.
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, CLEMENT, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Diogenes Ascencio-Lemus has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Aseencio-Lemus has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.