Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gregory M. ELLIOTT, Sr., a/k/a Gregory Mondell Elliott, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-05-10
Citations: 428 F. App'x 234
Docket Number: No. 10-7729
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gregory M. ELLIOTT, Sr., a/k/a Gregory Mondell Elliott, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 428
Pages: 234–235

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gregory M. ELLIOTT, Sr., a/k/a Gregory Mondell Elliott, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-7729.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 19, 2011.
Decided: May 10, 2011.
Gregory M. Elliott, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Sherrie Scott Capotosto, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Gregory M. Elliott, Sr., appeals the district court's orders denying his motion for sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Elliott, No. 2:07-cr-00097-RAJ-JEB-l (E.D. Va. July 15, 2009; filed Nov. 18, 2010 & entered Nov. 19, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.