Case Name: JOSEPH FEMIA, RESPONDENT, v. CITY OF BAYONNE, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1934-01-05
Citations: 112 N.J.L. 90
Docket Number: 
Parties: JOSEPH FEMIA, RESPONDENT, v. CITY OF BAYONNE, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 112
Pages: 90–90

Head Matter:
JOSEPH FEMIA, RESPONDENT, v. CITY OF BAYONNE, APPELLANT.
Argued October 23, 1933
Decided January 5, 1934.
Por the respondent, Hyman BrodsTcy.
Por the appellant, Daniel J. Murray.

Opinion:
Pee Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells^ Dill, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.