Case Name: W. V. PANGBORNE & CO., INC. v. WARK & COMPANY and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland. Appeal of WARK & COMPANY
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1975-03-18
Citations: 460 Pa. 588
Docket Number: Appeal No. 121
Parties: W. V. PANGBORNE & CO., INC. v. WARK & COMPANY and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland. Appeal of WARK & COMPANY.
Judges: Before JONES, C. J., and EAGEN, O’BRIEN, ROBERTS, POMEROY, NIX and MANDERINO, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 460
Pages: 588–589

Head Matter:
334 A.2d 247
W. V. PANGBORNE & CO., INC. v. WARK & COMPANY and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland. Appeal of WARK & COMPANY.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued April 29, 1974.
Decided March 18, 1975.
Arthur R. Littleton, Thomas C. Sadler, Jr., Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, G. M. Harvey, Philadelphia, for appellant.
Murray S. Levin, Philadelphia, Bruce L. Phillips, Robert F. Cushman, Philadelphia, for appellee, W. V. Pang-borne & Co., Inc.
Before JONES, C. J., and EAGEN, O’BRIEN, ROBERTS, POMEROY, NIX and MANDERINO, JJ.

Opinion:
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Having examined the record, we are of opinion that the parties to this appeal agreed to arbitrate disputes arising under the contract between them and that the claims which the appellee seeks to arbitrate are not excluded from the arbitration agreement by any provision of the Subcontract, including Article IX. See generally Flightways Corp. v. Keystone Helicopter Corp., 460 Pa. 660, 331 A.2d 184 [filed January 27, 1975]; Borough of Ambridge Water Authority v. Columbia, Pa., 328 A.2d 498 (1974).
Decree affirmed. Costs on appellant.
ROBERTS, J., filed a dissenting opinion.