Case Name: LLOYD A. LANDON, Petitioner, v. THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL et al., Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1927-02-28
Citations: 200 Cal. 798
Docket Number: L. A. No. 9634
Parties: LLOYD A. LANDON, Petitioner, v. THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Reports
Volume: 200
Pages: 798–798

Head Matter:
[L. A. No. 9634.
In Bank.
February 28, 1927.]
LLOYD A. LANDON, Petitioner, v. THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL et al., Respondents.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Munson T. Case, William G. Randall, Wm. J. Hunsaker, Daniel M. Hunsaker, P. M. Angellotti and Wm. B. Bosley for Petitioner.
U. 3. Webb, Attorney-General, and Robert W. Harrison, Chief Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.
R. P. Henshall, Amicus Curiae, for Petitioner.
John Perry Wood, Max Thelen, Warren Olney, Jr., and Thos. C. Ridgway, Amici Curiae, for Respondents.

Opinion:
THE COURT.
While the situation involved in this proceeding differs in certain respects from that involved in the matter of Fay v. District Court of Appeal et al., ante, p. 522 [254 Pac. 896], there is no difference in the legal principles applicable to each. Upon the authority of Fay v. District Court of Appeal, supra, it is ordered that a like order and writ accordingly issue.