Case Name: Rae N. Boslow, Respondent, v. Albert Epstein and William Roth, Defendants, and Hertz Drivurself Stations, Inc. (N. Y.), Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1930-12
Citations: 231 A.D. 840
Docket Number: 
Parties: Rae N. Boslow, Respondent, v. Albert Epstein and William Roth, Defendants, and Hertz Drivurself Stations, Inc. (N. Y.), Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 231
Pages: 840–840

Head Matter:
Rae N. Boslow, Respondent, v. Albert Epstein and William Roth, Defendants, and Hertz Drivurself Stations, Inc. (N. Y.), Appellant.

Opinion:
Judgment and order denying motion to set aside the verdict unanimously affirmed, with costs. The jury, in the light of the testimony in rebuttal as to the presence of Becker at the scene immediately following the accident, were enabled to say that the defense was not true. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ.