Case Name: Fenner v. Simon
Court: Appellate Court of Indiana
Jurisdiction: Indiana
Decision Date: 1901-05-09
Citations: 26 Ind. App. 628
Docket Number: No. 3,765
Parties: Fenner v. Simon.
Judges: 
Reporter: Indiana Court of Appeals Reports
Volume: 26
Pages: 628–628

Head Matter:
Fenner v. Simon.
[No. 3,765.
Filed May 9, 1901.]
New Trial. — Reasons.—Specifications.— That the judgment is contrary to the evidence, is not sustained by the evidence and is contrary to law, are not reasons for a new trial as recognized by §568 Burns 1894.
From the Noble Circuit Court.
Affirmed.
T. L. Graves and L. W. Welker, fox appellant.
H. C. Peterson, for appellee.

Opinion:
Black, J.
The overruling of the appellant's motion for a new tidal is alone assigned as error. In the motion for a new trial causes were stated as follows: "(1) The judgment of the court is contrary to the evidence; (2) the judgment of the court is not sustained by the evidence in this cause; (3) the judgment of the court is contrary to law." The statute prescribing the cases in which a new trial may be granted in a civil action does not recognize as a cause fox a new trial any of the reasons stated in this motion. §568 Burns 1894, §559 Homer 1891.
Judgment affirmed.