Case Name: PEOPLE v. MAY
Court: Michigan Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Michigan
Decision Date: 1971-05-26
Citations: 34 Mich. App. 130
Docket Number: Docket No. 10412
Parties: PEOPLE v. MAY
Judges: Before: Danhof, P. J., and Fitzgerald and Quinn, JJ.
Reporter: Michigan appeals reports; cases decided in the Michigan Court of Appeals.
Volume: 34
Pages: 130–131

Head Matter:
PEOPLE v. MAY
Appeal from Oakland, Farrell E. Roberts, J.
Submitted Division 2 May 10, 1971, at Lansing.
(Docket No. 10412.)
Decided May 26, 1971.
David E. May was convicted of uttering and publishing a forged instrument. Defendant appeals.
Affirmed.
Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, Thomas G. Plunkett, Prosecuting Attorney, and Frank R. Knox, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.
Curtis Rundell, for defendant on appeal.
Before: Danhof, P. J., and Fitzgerald and Quinn, JJ.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Defendant seeks reversal of his jury conviction and sentence for uttering and publishing a forged instrument, MCLA § 750.249 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.446). He contends reversible error was committed because the prosecuting attorney was not required to indorse and produce an alleged res gestae witness. The record indicates that this witness was known to defendant prior to trial and defendant failed to move at trial for the indorsement of the witness. The question presented was not saved for review. People v. Love (1969), 18 Mich App 228, 231.
Affirmed.