Case Name: John S. STRITZINGER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Brian MOYNIHAN, Bank of America; Kathryn Ruemeller, Whitehouse; Lowell McAdam, Verizon; Katherine Wright; United States Attorney-SC; US Supreme Court Clerk; Supply Chain Partners, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-06-26
Citations: 692 F. App'x 156
Docket Number: No. 17-1161
Parties: John S. STRITZINGER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Brian MOYNIHAN, Bank of America; Kathryn Ruemeller, Whitehouse; Lowell McAdam, Verizon; Katherine Wright; United States Attorney-SC; US Supreme Court Clerk; Supply Chain Partners, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 692
Pages: 156–156

Head Matter:
John S. STRITZINGER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Brian MOYNIHAN, Bank of America; Kathryn Ruemeller, Whitehouse; Lowell McAdam, Verizon; Katherine Wright; United States Attorney-SC; US Supreme Court Clerk; Supply Chain Partners, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 17-1161
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 22, 2017
Decided: June 26, 2017
John S. Stritzinger, Appellant Pro Se.
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
John S. Stritzinger seeks to appeal the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss his complaint for failing to comply with a court order. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.
When the United States or its officer or agency is a party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than 60 days after the entry of the district court's final judgment or order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). "[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement." Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007).
The district court's order was entered on the docket on May 27, 2016. The notice of appeal was filed on February 2, 2017. Because Stritzinger failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny Stritzinger's pending motions, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED