Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. George Rodriguez, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2007-11-20
Citations: 45 A.D.3d 786
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v George Rodriguez, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 45
Pages: 786–786

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v George Rodriguez, Appellant.
[844 NYS2d 902]

Opinion:
Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Konviser, J.), both rendered June 1, 2005, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and robbery in the second degree (two counts) under indictment No. 1458/04, and robbery in the first degree under indictment No. 4691/04, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences. The appeal from the judgment rendered under indictment No. 1458/04 brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Harms, J.), of that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.
Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.
The record does not reflect that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248 [2006]; People v Hurd, 44 AD3d 791 [2007]; cf. People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737 [2006]). We find that the hearing court properly denied that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence (see People v Gray, 35 AD3d 629 [2006]). Furthermore, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Miller, J.P., Crane, Ritter and Lifson, JJ., concur.