Case Name: Irving Ehrenhaus, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. John D. Baker, II, Peter C. Browning, John T. Casteen, III, Jerry Gitt, William H. Goodwin, Jr., Maryellen C. Herringer, Robert A. Ingram, Donald M. James, Mackey J. McDonald, Joseph Neubauer, Timothy D. Proctor, Ernest S. Rady, Van I. Richey, Ruth G. Shaw, Lanty L. Smith, Dona Davis Young, Wachovia Corporation, and Wells Fargo & Company v. Norwood Robinson and John H. Loughridge, Jr., Objectors
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 2012-12-12
Citations: 366 N.C. 420
Docket Number: 486P11
Parties: Irving Ehrenhaus, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. John D. Baker, II, Peter C. Browning, John T. Casteen, III, Jerry Gitt, William H. Goodwin, Jr., Maryellen C. Herringer, Robert A. Ingram, Donald M. James, Mackey J. McDonald, Joseph Neubauer, Timothy D. Proctor, Ernest S. Rady, Van I. Richey, Ruth G. Shaw, Lanty L. Smith, Dona Davis Young, Wachovia Corporation, and Wells Fargo & Company v. Norwood Robinson and John H. Loughridge, Jr., Objectors
Judges: 
Reporter: North Carolina Reports
Volume: 366
Pages: 420–420

Head Matter:
486P11
Irving Ehrenhaus, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. John D. Baker, II, Peter C. Browning, John T. Casteen, III, Jerry Gitt, William H. Goodwin, Jr., Maryellen C. Herringer, Robert A. Ingram, Donald M. James, Mackey J. McDonald, Joseph Neubauer, Timothy D. Proctor, Ernest S. Rady, Van I. Richey, Ruth G. Shaw, Lanty L. Smith, Dona Davis Young, Wachovia Corporation, and Wells Fargo & Company v. Norwood Robinson and John H. Loughridge, Jr., Objectors

Opinion:
1. Objectors' Pro Se NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA10-1034)
2. Objectors' Pro Se PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31
3. Defs' Motion to Dismiss Appeal
4. Pit's Motion to Dismiss Appeal
L —
2. Denied
3. Allowed
4. Allowed