Case Name: Dione M. THOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOTERA DEFENSE SOLUTION, INC.; Sotera Defense Solutions, Inc.; Jacobs Federal Network Systems LLC, Defendants-Appellees, and FNS Jacobs; Kenuana Engram; Patricia Shea; Vernon Saunders; Deborah Drake, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-02-14
Citations: 676 F. App'x 199
Docket Number: No. 16-1860
Parties: Dione M. THOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOTERA DEFENSE SOLUTION, INC.; Sotera Defense Solutions, Inc.; Jacobs Federal Network Systems LLC, Defendants-Appellees, and FNS Jacobs; Kenuana Engram; Patricia Shea; Vernon Saunders; Deborah Drake, Defendants.
Judges: Before SHEDD and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 676
Pages: 199–200

Head Matter:
Dione M. THOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOTERA DEFENSE SOLUTION, INC.; Sotera Defense Solutions, Inc.; Jacobs Federal Network Systems LLC, Defendants-Appellees, and FNS Jacobs; Kenuana Engram; Patricia Shea; Vernon Saunders; Deborah Drake, Defendants.
No. 16-1860
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: January 31, 2017
Decided: February 14, 2017
Dione M, Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Anessa Abrams, Jacquelyn Lorraine Thompson, FORD HARRISON LLP, Washington, D.C.; Christopher Eric Hum-ber, OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Before SHEDD and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed in part; affirmed in part as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Dione M. Thomas appeals the district court's orders granting defendants' motions to dismiss her second amended complaint in this employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the dismissal of count I for the reasons stated by the district court. We likewise affirm the dismissal of count II, but as modified to reflect dismissal of that count without prejudice. Thomas v. Sotera Defense Solutions, Inc., No. 1:15-cv-00596-CMH-MSN (E.D. Va. filed July 19, 2016 & entered July 20, 2016; July 27, 2016). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART AS MODIFIED