Case Name: Stults, Receiver, v. Bank of Linn Grove et al.
Court: Appellate Court of Indiana
Jurisdiction: Indiana
Decision Date: 1931-06-18
Citations: 92 Ind. App. 536
Docket Number: No. 13,991
Parties: Stults, Receiver, v. Bank of Linn Grove et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Indiana Court of Appeals Reports
Volume: 92
Pages: 536–537

Head Matter:
Stults, Receiver, v. Bank of Linn Grove et al.
[No. 13,991.
Filed June 18, 1931.]
Abram Simmons and Virgil M. Simmons, for appellant.
Eichhorn, Gordon & Edris, for appellees.

Opinion:
Kime, J.
This is an appeal from the same judgment appealed from in the case of Bank of Linn Grove v. Stults, Rec. (1931), 176 N. E. (Ind. App.) 707. In fact, this case was filed in this court before that one.
It is called to our attention by a verified motion filed in Bank of Linn Grove v. Stults, Rec., supra, that the appellant here has voluntarily released, satisfied and accepted the benefit of the judgment appealed from. It appears conclusively that this controversy has been settled and appellant has no further interest therein. Ogborn v. City of New Castle (1912), 178 Ind. 161, 98 N. E. 869, and cases- cited; South Park Floral Co. v. Garvey (1915), 182 Ind. 635, 107 N. E. 68; Payne v. Peugh (1913), 54 Ind. App. 551, 103 N. E. 117; Howard v. Happell (1914), 181 Ind. 165, 103 N. E. 1065; Chicago, etc., Co. v. Lewis, Rec. (1901), 156 Ind. 232, 59 N. E. 466; State, ex rel., v. Indianapolis Gas Co. (1904), 163 Ind. 48, 71 N. E. 139.
For the above reason this appeal is dismissed, at the cost of the appellant.