Case Name: Maria Magdalena Funes OBREGO, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-03-02
Citations: 470 F. App'x 603
Docket Number: No. 09-73381
Parties: Maria Magdalena Funes OBREGO, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 470
Pages: 603–604

Head Matter:
Maria Magdalena Funes OBREGO, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 09-73381.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 21, 2012.
Filed March 2, 2012.
Steven P. Brazelton, Law Offices of Steven P. Brazelton, Reno, NV, for Petitioner.
Oil, Matthew B. George, Lisa Morinelli, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Maria Magdalena Funes Obrego, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order denying her motion to reconsider. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reconsider, Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791 (9th Cir.2005), and we deny the petition for review.
The BIA acted within its discretion in denying Obrego's motion to reconsider because the motion failed to identify any error of fact or law in the BIA's prior order. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.