Case Name: Anthony M. BELCHER, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant-Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1997-03-25
Citations: 943 S.W.2d 253
Docket Number: No. 70010
Parties: Anthony M. BELCHER, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant-Respondent.
Judges: Before DOWD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRANE, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 943
Pages: 253–253

Head Matter:
Anthony M. BELCHER, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant-Respondent.
No. 70010.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
March 25, 1997.
Irene Karns, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for movant-appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for defendant-respondent.
Before DOWD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRANE, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Anthony M. Belcher (Movant) appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).