Case Name: FEIST & FEIST, INC., RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM P. HURLEY, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1939-01-13
Citations: 121 N.J.L. 587
Docket Number: 
Parties: FEIST & FEIST, INC., RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM P. HURLEY, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 121
Pages: 587–588

Head Matter:
FEIST & FEIST, INC., RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM P. HURLEY, APPELLANT.
Argued October 21, 1938
Decided January 13, 1939.
For the respondent, Schotland, Harrison & Schotland.
For the appellant, Harry Unger.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Case in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Bodine, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 12.
For reversal — -Heher, Walker, JJ. 2.