Case Name: Isaac CLARK, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-12-18
Citations: 831 So. 2d 1282
Docket Number: No. 3D01-2760
Parties: Isaac CLARK, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before JORGENSON, COPE, and SHEVIN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 831
Pages: 1282–1282

Head Matter:
Isaac CLARK, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D01-2760.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 18, 2002.
Isaac Clark, in proper person.
Richard E. Doran, Attorney General, and Erin K. Zack, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before JORGENSON, COPE, and SHEVIN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals from the denial of his motion for postconviction relief. We affirm on the authority of Scott v. State, 813 So.2d 1025 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (holding that defendant not entitled to relief "where he has been given affirmative misadviee regarding the possible sentencing-enhancing consequences of a plea in the event that the defendant commits a new crime in the future"). See also McPhee v. State, 823 So.2d 160 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Wallace v. State, 833 So.2d 796 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002).
As we did in Wallace and McPhee, we certify conflict with Smith v. State, 784 So.2d 460 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).
AFFIRMED.