Case Name: Irving Hill and R. E. Protsch, as Bondholders, etc., of the International Improvement Company, Appellants, v. Lou D. Sweet et al., Appellees
Court: Kansas Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Kansas
Decision Date: 1917-05-12
Citations: 100 Kan. 531
Docket Number: No. 20,842
Parties: Irving Hill and R. E. Protsch, as Bondholders, etc., of the International Improvement Company, Appellants, v. Lou D. Sweet et al., Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Kansas Reports
Volume: 100
Pages: 531–531

Head Matter:
No. 20,842.
Irving Hill and R. E. Protsch, as Bondholders, etc., of the International Improvement Company, Appellants, v. Lou D. Sweet et al., Appellees.
Appeal from Douglas district court; Charles A, Smart, judge.
Opinion filed May 12, 1917.
Dismissed.
S. D. Bishop, of Lawrence, for the appellants.
F. S. Jackson, of Topeka, for the appellees.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
This is an appeal from an order setting aside a judgment rendered by default upon service by publication, and permitting defendants to answer in the action. It has been repeatedly held that such an order is not one which can be reviewed while the action is still pending in the district court. McCulloch v. Dodge, 8 Kan. 476.; Flint v. Noyes, 27 Kan. 351, 353; List v. Jockheck, 45 Kan. 349, 27 Pac. 184; Shurtleff v. Chase County, 63 Kan. 645, 652, 66 Pac. 654; Vail v. School District, 86 Kan. 808, 811, 122 Pac. 885.
The appeal is dismissed.