Case Name: Daniel F. JAGGERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-05-16
Citations: 542 So. 2d 1069
Docket Number: No. 88-2276
Parties: Daniel F. JAGGERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: NIMMONS, BARFIELD and MINER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 542
Pages: 1069–1070

Head Matter:
Daniel F. JAGGERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 88-2276.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
May 16, 1989.
Michael E. Allen, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Bradford L. Thomas, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, whose offense was committed prior to the effective date of the sentencing guidelines, argues that he was improperly sentenced on remand under amended guidelines which were not in effect at the time he originally elected to be sentenced under the guidelines. However, the record indicates that appellant's trial counsel did not object to the guidelines used at his sentencing, thereby waiving the issue on direct appeal.
AFFIRMED without prejudice to any right appellant may have to seek relief via Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel.
NIMMONS, BARFIELD and MINER, JJ., concur.