Case Name: Avery Dale OWENSBY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer JOHNSON, Road Squad Crew Chief; Officer Hall, Road Squad Transportation, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-05-23
Citations: 639 F. App'x 970
Docket Number: No. 16-6348
Parties: Avery Dale OWENSBY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer JOHNSON, Road Squad Crew Chief; Officer Hall, Road Squad Transportation, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 639
Pages: 970–970

Head Matter:
Avery Dale OWENSBY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer JOHNSON, Road Squad Crew Chief; Officer Hall, Road Squad Transportation, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-6348.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 18, 2016.
Decided: May 23, 2016.
Avery Dale Owensby, Appellant Pro Se.
Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Avery Dale Owensby seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing his civil action without prejudice. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). Because Owensby may be able to remedy the pleading deficiencies identified by the district court by filing an amended complaint, we conclude that the order Ow-ensby seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc'y, Inc., 807 F.3d 619, 623-24 (4th Cir.2015); Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir.1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.