Case Name: F. H. Pierson et al. v. Royall R. Watkins, District Judge, et al.
Court: Supreme Court of Texas
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1933-04-01
Citations: 122 Tex. 318
Docket Number: Motion No. 10689
Parties: F. H. Pierson et al. v. Royall R. Watkins, District Judge, et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Reports
Volume: 122
Pages: 318–318

Head Matter:
APRIL, 1933
F. H. Pierson et al. v. Royall R. Watkins, District Judge, et al.
Motion No. 10689.
Decided April 1, 1933.
(58 S. W., 2d Series, 820.)
James V. Allred, Attorney General, Maurice Cheek, Willis S. Gresham and A. R. Stout, Assistants Attorney General, for relators.
Hamilton & Hamilton, of Dallas, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to file the petition for writ of mandamus and prohibition is overruled, without prejudice to the rights of relators to again present the subject-matter of the application to this- Court, should it be subsequently shown that the available remedies in the District Court and Court of Civil Appeals are inadequate to protect the rights of the relators.