Case Name: Latrese D. SCOTT-BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William COHEN, Secretary of Defense, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-12-30
Citations: 54 F. App'x 140
Docket Number: No. 02-2140
Parties: Latrese D. SCOTT-BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William COHEN, Secretary of Defense, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 54
Pages: 140–141

Head Matter:
Latrese D. SCOTT-BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William COHEN, Secretary of Defense, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 02-2140.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 19, 2002.
Decided Dec. 30, 2002.
Latrese D. Scott-Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Frank Corcoran, Assistant United States Attorney, Jennifer Lilore Huesman, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before WILLIAM D. WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Latrese D. Scott-Brown appeals from the district court's orders granting summary judgment to the Defendants as to some claims and a monetary judgment based upon a jury verdict in her favor as to other claims in this action pursuant to Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Scott-Brown v. Cohen, No. CA-00-3570-AW (D. Md. Aug. 14, 2001; July 15, 2002; filed July 18 and entered July 24, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.