Case Name: Zane A. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Steve BAILEY; Robert C. Lewis; Keith Whitener; Carlos Hernandez; Rosamuel Dawkins; Doug Walker; FNU Evans; FNU Kirby; FNU Christopher, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-02-26
Citations: 367 F. App'x 451
Docket Number: No. 09-8037
Parties: Zane A. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Steve BAILEY; Robert C. Lewis; Keith Whitener; Carlos Hernandez; Rosamuel Dawkins; Doug Walker; FNU Evans; FNU Kirby; FNU Christopher, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 367
Pages: 451–452

Head Matter:
Zane A. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Steve BAILEY; Robert C. Lewis; Keith Whitener; Carlos Hernandez; Rosamuel Dawkins; Doug Walker; FNU Evans; FNU Kirby; FNU Christopher, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 09-8037.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 18, 2010.
Decided: Feb. 26, 2010.
Zane A. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Zane A. Johnson appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Johnson's motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Bailey, No. 5:09-cv-00109-GCM, 2009 WL 3423016 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 23, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.