Case Name: Michael CLAVIER, Appellant, v. Unknown GOODSON, Sgt.; Unknown Wilson, Lt.; Unknown Toppins, Lt., in their individual and official capacities, Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-05-21
Citations: 232 F. App'x 616
Docket Number: No. 06-1509
Parties: Michael CLAVIER, Appellant, v. Unknown GOODSON, Sgt.; Unknown Wilson, Lt.; Unknown Toppins, Lt., in their individual and official capacities, Appellees.
Judges: Before SMITH, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 232
Pages: 616–617

Head Matter:
Michael CLAVIER, Appellant, v. Unknown GOODSON, Sgt.; Unknown Wilson, Lt.; Unknown Toppins, Lt., in their individual and official capacities, Appellees.
No. 06-1509.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: May 10, 2007.
Filed: May 21, 2007.
Michael Clavier, Tipton, MO, pro se.
Dustin James Allison, Attorney General’s Office, St. Louis, MO, for Appellees.
Before SMITH, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Missouri inmate Michael Clavier appeals the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against three correctional officers in their individual and official capacities. Clavier alleged that, based on their incorrect belief that he had ingested drugs during a prison visit, defendants gave him a choice between drinking water to induce vomiting or spending time in a "dry cell" (a cell without plumbing); he chose the vomiting option to avoid spending several days handcuffed in a dry cell, and as a result he suffered a sore throat and bruised muscle. Clavier claimed, as relevant to this appeal, that defendants' actions violated his Eighth Amendment rights, and he requested damages and injunctive relief.
We conclude that dismissal was proper because defendants' actions did not amount to an Eighth Amendment violation. See Whitley v. Albers, 475 U.S. 312, 319, 106 S.Ct. 1078, 89 L.Ed.2d 251 (1986) (only unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain constitutes cruel and unusual punishment forbidden by Eighth Amendment); Avalos v. City of Glenwood, 382 F.3d 792, 798 (8th Cir.2004) (if no constitutional right has been violated, further inquiry regarding qualified immunity is unnecessary). Clavier's remaining arguments are without merit.
Accordingly, we affirm.
. The Honorable Catherine D. Perry, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.