Case Name: Vincent Kyle TAYLOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harold CLARKE, Director, Department of Corrections; Mr. Walker, Warden; Dr. Nwakucha, Medical Doctor; Mr. Horn, Sergeant; B. Boise, Correctional Officer; Mr. Diggs, Warden; Ms. Clarke, Medical Doctor; M. Price, Medical Administrator; Mr. Harding, Sergeant, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-12-19
Citations: 671 F. App'x 197
Docket Number: No. 16-6910
Parties: Vincent Kyle TAYLOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harold CLARKE, Director, Department of Corrections; Mr. Walker, Warden; Dr. Nwakucha, Medical Doctor; Mr. Horn, Sergeant; B. Boise, Correctional Officer; Mr. Diggs, Warden; Ms. Clarke, Medical Doctor; M. Price, Medical Administrator; Mr. Harding, Sergeant, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 671
Pages: 197–197

Head Matter:
Vincent Kyle TAYLOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harold CLARKE, Director, Department of Corrections; Mr. Walker, Warden; Dr. Nwakucha, Medical Doctor; Mr. Horn, Sergeant; B. Boise, Correctional Officer; Mr. Diggs, Warden; Ms. Clarke, Medical Doctor; M. Price, Medical Administrator; Mr. Harding, Sergeant, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-6910
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: December 15, 2016
Decided: December 19, 2016
Vincent Kyle Taylor, Appellant Pro Se.
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Vincent Kyle Taylor appeals the district court's order dismissing Taylor's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint, and he has filed .motions for appointment of counsel. Taylor's failure to challenge on appeal the district court's dispositive holdings amounts to a waiver of appellate review of those holdings. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th C.ir. 2004). Thus, we affirm the district court's judgment. Taylor v. Clarke, No. 1:15-cv-01188-JCC-TCB (E.D. Va. June 23, 2016). We deny Taylor's motions for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED