Case Name: Lamont PARKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2013-02-13
Citations: 391 S.W.3d 913
Docket Number: No. ED 98208
Parties: Lamont PARKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., PATRICIA L. COHEN, J., and KURT S. ODENWALD, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 391
Pages: 913–913

Head Matter:
Lamont PARKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 98208.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Feb. 13, 2013.
Maleaner R. Harvey, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Andrew C. Hooper, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., PATRICIA L. COHEN, J., and KURT S. ODENWALD, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Lamont Parker (Movant) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant contends that the motion court erred in denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to inform him prior to his guilty plea that the defense of accident was available to him.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court's decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).