Case Name: James Earl WOODRUFF, Plaintiff in Error, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Defendant in Error
Court: Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1969-09-17
Citations: 462 P.2d 317
Docket Number: No. A-14845
Parties: James Earl WOODRUFF, Plaintiff in Error, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Defendant in Error.
Judges: BUSSEY and NIX, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Pacific Reporter 2d
Volume: 462
Pages: 317–318

Head Matter:
James Earl WOODRUFF, Plaintiff in Error, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Defendant in Error.
No. A-14845.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.
Sept. 17, 1969.
Stewart A. Pearce, Tulsa, for plaintiff in error.
G. T. Blankenship, Atty. Gen., Charles L. Owens, Asst. Atty. Gen., S. M. Fallis, Jr., Dist. Atty., Ted Flanagan, Asst. Dist. Atty., Tulsa, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BRETT, Presiding Judge.
This is an appeal from a plea of guilty by Plaintiff in Error, James Earl Wood-ruff, hereafter referred to as defendant, to the crime of Burglary Second Degree, After Former Conviction of a Felony. He was sentenced by the trial court to serve a term of Ten Years in the State Peniténtiary, and his court-appointed counsel has perfected his appeal by transcript, alleging only that the sentence is excessive.
This Court has reviewed the transcript, and the briefs filed, and finds no merit to this Allegation. The records before the Court show that defendant received a fair trial; that he knowingly and intelligently entered his plea of guilty with full knowledge of the consequences thereof. Likewise, the defendant could have received from Two Years to Life Imprisonment, and the Ten Year Sentence he received is well within the statutory limits. The judgment and sentence is therefore, affirmed.
BUSSEY and NIX, JJ., concur.