Case Name: Richard LOW, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-01-28
Citations: 98 S.W.3d 89
Docket Number: No. ED 80791
Parties: Richard LOW, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before PAUL J. SIMON, P.J. and GARY M. GAERTNER, SR. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 98
Pages: 89–90

Head Matter:
Richard LOW, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 80791.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Jan. 28, 2003.
Raymund J. Capelovitch, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Dora A. Fichter, Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before PAUL J. SIMON, P.J. and GARY M. GAERTNER, SR. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Richard Low, appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. He claims the poor medical care provided in jail and the conditions of his incarceration coerced him into pleading guilty.
Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum for their use only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).