Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cecil Arnold ODOM, a/k/a Bud Kelly, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1990-01-24
Citations: 895 F.2d 928
Docket Number: No. 88-5687
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cecil Arnold ODOM, a/k/a Bud Kelly, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Entered at the direction of Judge CHAPMAN, Circuit Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 895
Pages: 928–931

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cecil Arnold ODOM, a/k/a Bud Kelly, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 88-5687.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Jan. 24, 1990.
Luther Charles West, Baltimore, Md., for defendant-appellant.
Barbara Slaymaker Sale, Asst. U.S. Atty., Baltimore, Md. (Breckinridge L. Will-cox, U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., on brief), for plaintiff-appellee.

Opinion:
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING WITH SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING IN BANC
ORDER
The appellant's petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in banc were submitted to the Court. In a requested poll of the Court, Judges Phillips, Murna-ghan, Sprouse, and Winter voted to rehear the case in banc; and Judges Ervin, Russell, Widener, Hall, Chapman, Wilkinson, and Wilkins voted against rehearing the case in banc. As a majority of the judges voted to deny rehearing in banc, and
As the panel considered the petition for rehearing and is of the opinion that it should be denied, with Judge Murnaghan dissenting,
IT IS ADJUDGED AND ORDERED that the petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in bane are denied.
Entered at the direction of Judge CHAPMAN, Circuit Judge.
MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judge, dissents.