Case Name: David E. Heim et al., Appellants, v. Tri-Lakes Ford Mercury, Inc., et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2006-05-09
Citations: 6 N.Y.3d 886
Docket Number: 
Parties: David E. Heim et al., Appellants, v Tri-Lakes Ford Mercury, Inc., et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 6
Pages: 886–886

Head Matter:
David E. Heim et al., Appellants, v Tri-Lakes Ford Mercury, Inc., et al., Respondents.
Submitted February 21, 2006;
decided May 9, 2006

Opinion:
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed Supreme Court's order denying appellants' motion to renew, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.