Case Name: Charles J. Roussel, Respondent, v. Armitage Mathews, as Receiver of Plock, Steinbach & Murray, et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1902-04-18
Citations: 171 N.Y. 634
Docket Number: 
Parties: Charles J. Roussel, Respondent, v. Armitage Mathews, as Receiver of Plock, Steinbach & Murray, et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 171
Pages: 634–635

Head Matter:
Charles J. Roussel, Respondent, v. Armitage Mathews, as Receiver of Plock, Steinbach & Murray, et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others.
Roussel v. Mathews, 62 App. Div. 1, affirmed.
(Argued April 4, 1902;
decided April 18, 1902.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 15, 1901, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee.
William S. Bennet for appellants.
Daniel Whitford and William Lloyd Kitchel for respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O'Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin and Vann, JJ.