Case Name: MUTUAL BENEFIT INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner v. Christos POLITOPOULOS, Dionysios Mihalopoulos and Marina Denovitz, Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2014-06-20
Citations: 95 A.3d 268
Docket Number: 
Parties: MUTUAL BENEFIT INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner v. Christos POLITOPOULOS, Dionysios Mihalopoulos and Marina Denovitz, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 95
Pages: 268–268

Head Matter:
MUTUAL BENEFIT INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner v. Christos POLITOPOULOS, Dionysios Mihalopoulos and Marina Denovitz, Respondents.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
June 20, 2014.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 20th day of June, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the following issue set forth below: Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
Whether the Superior Court properly ruled that Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Association Insurance Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Insurance Co., 426 Pa. 453, 233 A.2d 548 (1967) ("PMA") did not control in the instant case because of the divergence in wording between the "sever-ability clause" in PMA and the language in the Umbrella Policy here, finding that the plain unambiguous language in the case at hand provides coverage for the liability in question.