Case Name: Robert DOWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2009-09-11
Citations: 17 So. 3d 343
Docket Number: No. 5D09-1284
Parties: Robert DOWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: PALMER, ORFINGER and LAWSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 17
Pages: 343–344

Head Matter:
Robert DOWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D09-1284.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Sept. 11, 2009.
Robert L. Dowell, Okeechobee, pro se.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Anthony J. Golden, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Ap-pellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We find no error in the trial court's summary denial of Robert Dowell's motion to correct illegal sentence, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Dowell's motion challenged his consecutive sentences as illegal, alleging a double jeopardy violation based upon the facts related to his underlying convictions. Because Dowell's motion did not "allege with particularity both the non-hearsay record documents that show an error on the face of the record, and 'how and where' the record demonstrates [that] the consecutive sentences" violate double jeopardy, Theophile v. State, 967 So.2d 948, 949 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007), Dowell's motion was facially insufficient. Id.
AFFIRMED.
PALMER, ORFINGER and LAWSON, JJ., concur.