Case Name: Sullivan & Cromwell, Respondent, v. Hudson & Manhattan Corporation, Appellant; Sullivan & Cromwell, Respondent, v. Hudson Rapid Tubes Corporation, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1971-02-18
Citations: 28 N.Y.2d 660
Docket Number: 
Parties: Sullivan & Cromwell, Respondent, v. Hudson & Manhattan Corporation, Appellant. Sullivan & Cromwell, Respondent, v. Hudson Rapid Tubes Corporation, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 28
Pages: 660–661

Head Matter:
Sullivan & Cromwell, Respondent, v. Hudson & Manhattan Corporation, Appellant. Sullivan & Cromwell, Respondent, v. Hudson Rapid Tubes Corporation, Appellant.
Submitted January 25, 1971;
decided February 18, 1971.
Sheldon Oliensis, L. Robert Driver, Jr., Jay G. Strum and Randolph S. Sherman for motion.
William Piel, Jr. opposed.

Opinion:
Motion granted. Some of the members of the court believe the granting of leave is improvident upon the ground that there is no reviewable question presented. Chief Judge Fuld taking no part.