Case Name: Van Lester McKINZY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1968-04-30
Citations: 209 So. 2d 701
Docket Number: No. 67-722
Parties: Van Lester McKINZY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before PEARSON, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 209
Pages: 701–702

Head Matter:
Van Lester McKINZY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 67-722.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
April 30, 1968.
Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender and Jeffrey Michael Cohen, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen. and Jesse J. McCrary, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before PEARSON, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from appellant's conviction after a non-jury trial upon the charge of assault with intent to commit robbery. The appellant argues that the evidence as to identity contained in the trial record is unclear and is insufficient to identify him as the person who assaulted the complaining witness. Our review of the record convinces us that this argument is without basis. See Wright v. State, Fla.App.1966, 182 So.2d 264.
Affirmed.