Case Name: Florentino FALCON, Appellant, v. MANGO HILL CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION NO. 2, INC., et al., Appellees.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2017-12-27
Citations: 238 So. 3d 382
Docket Number: No. 3D17–1029
Parties: Florentino FALCON, Appellant,
v.
MANGO HILL CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION NO. 2, INC., et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before SUAREZ, FERNANDEZ and LINDSEY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 238
Pages: 382–382

Head Matter:
Florentino FALCON, Appellant,
v.
MANGO HILL CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION NO. 2, INC., et al., Appellees.
No. 3D17-1029
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Opinion filed December 27, 2017
David Low & Associates, P.A. and Amanda Sidman (Ft. Lauderdale), for appellant.
Nancy C. Wear, for appellees.
Before SUAREZ, FERNANDEZ and LINDSEY, JJ.

Opinion:
SUAREZ, J.
Florentino Falcon appeals from a final order dismissing his first amended complaint with prejudice. Because we find that the complaint asserted a viable claim and that dismissal was not appropriate to resolve the issue of whether Falcon's back patio was a "limited common element" pursuant to the Declaration of Condominium, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. We make no findings as to the nature of the patio or the parties' rights and responsibilities under the Declaration.
Reversed and remanded.