Case Name: In the Matter of the Compensation of the Beneficiaries of Archie L. Deloney (Deceased), Claimant. DELONEY, Petitioner, v. NORTHWEST MARINE IRON WORKS, Respondent. In the Matter of the Compensation of the Beneficiaries of Archie L. Deloney (Deceased), Claimant. DELONEY, Petitioner, v. DILLINGHAM SHIP REPAIR, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1984-12-05
Citations: 71 Or. App. 310
Docket Number: 82-09095; CA A31315; 82-09755; CA A31316
Parties: In the Matter of the Compensation of the Beneficiaries of Archie L. Deloney (Deceased), Claimant. DELONEY, Petitioner, v. NORTHWEST MARINE IRON WORKS, Respondent. In the Matter of the Compensation of the Beneficiaries of Archie L. Deloney (Deceased), Claimant. DELONEY, Petitioner, v. DILLINGHAM SHIP REPAIR, Respondent.
Judges: Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Van Hoomissen and Young, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 71
Pages: 310–312

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted November 16,
affirmed December 5, 1984,
reconsideration denied January 25,
petition for review denied February 20, 1985 (298 Or 705)
In the Matter of the Compensation of the Beneficiaries of Archie L. Deloney (Deceased), Claimant. DELONEY, Petitioner, v. NORTHWEST MARINE IRON WORKS, Respondent. In the Matter of the Compensation of the Beneficiaries of Archie L. Deloney (Deceased), Claimant. DELONEY, Petitioner, v. DILLINGHAM SHIP REPAIR, Respondent.
(82-09095; CA A31315 (Control))
(82-09755; CA A31316)
(Cases Consolidated)
692 P2d 130
Allen T. Murphy, Jr., Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Richardson & Murphy, Portland.
Kevin L. Mannix, Portland, argued the cause for respondent Northwest Marine Iron Works. With him on the brief was Lindsay, Hart, Neil & Weigler, Portland.
Patrie J. Doherty, Portland, argued the cause for respondent Dillingham Ship Repair. With him on the brief were Dennis R. VavRosky and Rankin, McMurry, VavRosky & Doherty, Portland.
Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Van Hoomissen and Young, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
In these consolidated workers' compensation cases, the orders of the Workers' Compensation Board dismissing a widow's claims for death benefits on the ground the claims were not timely filed are affirmed. Fossum v. SAIF, 289 Or 787, 794, 619 P2d 233 (1980); Granquist v. SAIF, 25 Or App 27, 547 P2d 1374 (1976).
Affirmed.