Case Name: ESTATE OF Mary V. ALLISON, Donor, Deceased; Daniel B. Allison, II, former attorney of record for the Estate of Mary V. Allison, Donor, Deceased, Petitioners-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-12-03
Citations: 403 F. App'x 866
Docket Number: No. 10-1273
Parties: ESTATE OF Mary V. ALLISON, Donor, Deceased; Daniel B. Allison, II, former attorney of record for the Estate of Mary V. Allison, Donor, Deceased, Petitioners—Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent—Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 403
Pages: 866–867

Head Matter:
ESTATE OF Mary V. ALLISON, Donor, Deceased; Daniel B. Allison, II, former attorney of record for the Estate of Mary V. Allison, Donor, Deceased, Petitioners—Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent—Appellee.
No. 10-1273.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 30, 2010.
Decided: Dec. 3, 2010.
Daniel B. Allison, II, Appellant Pro Se. Curtis Clarence Pett, Bruce R. Ellisen, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Daniel B. Allison, II, individually and as the administrator of the Estate of Mary V. Allison, appeals from the tax court's orders imposing sanctions on him and upholding the Commissioner's determination of a deficiency in the estate's gift tax. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. Estate of Mary V. Allison v. Comm'r of IRS, Nos. 00-247; 00-714 (U.S.T.C. Feb. 12, 2009 & Dec. 1, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.