Case Name: Von Ax Halstead, v. Halstead and Others
Court: New York Superior Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1893
Citations: 3 Misc. 618
Docket Number: 
Parties: Von Ax Halstead, v. Halstead and Others.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 3
Pages: 618–618

Head Matter:
Von Ax Halstead, v. Halstead and Others.
Appeal from order denying defendants’ motion for inspection of certain letters, written to plaintiff, and in her possession.
John, M. Bowers, for defendants (appellants).
Lmmson (& Falk, for plaintiff (respondent).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
There were certain characteristics of the application below which justify the decision that was made. It was uncertain that the letters contained anything that would benefit the defendants, if offered as evidence. Indeed, the contents are undisclosed. The application does not avow specifically that the contents, if learned, will be offered in testimony upon the trial.
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs.