Case Name: UNITED INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Appellant, v. RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION, as Conservator of Professional Federal Savings Bank, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-09-11
Citations: 566 So. 2d 370
Docket Number: No. 89-2245
Parties: UNITED INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Appellant, v. RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION, as Conservator of Professional Federal Savings Bank, Appellee.
Judges: Before HUBBART, NESBITT and GERSTEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 566
Pages: 370–371

Head Matter:
UNITED INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Appellant, v. RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION, as Conservator of Professional Federal Savings Bank, Appellee.
No. 89-2245.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Sept. 11, 1990.
Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler Alhadeff & Sitterson, and Davia Odell Mazur, Miami, for appellant.
Mishan, Sloto, Hoffman & Greenberg, and Julie Feigeles, Miami, for appellee.
Before HUBBART, NESBITT and GERSTEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, United Investments Limited Partnership, appeals from a partial summary judgement in favor of appellee, Professional Savings Bank, on appellee's action to foreclose on two mortgages. Appellant also seeks to set aside the foreclosure sale of the property secured by the mortgages.
We rule the trial court erred in entering the partial summary judgment because we find that disputed issues of material fact remain, precluding the partial summary judgment. Moore v. Morris, 475 So.2d 666 (Fla.1985); Braidi Trading Company v. Anthony R. Abraham Enterprises, Inc., 469 So.2d 955 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Mejiah v. Rodriguez, 342 So.2d 1066 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). The trial court also erred in permitting the foreclosure sale to proceed without having ruled upon appellant's motion for rehearing. Wollman v. Levy, 489 So.2d 1239 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).
Accordingly, the partial summary judgment of foreclosure is reversed, and the cause is remanded with directions to set aside the foreclosure sale, and for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.