Case Name: John Fitzgerald BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THOMAS SUPPLY COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-01-18
Citations: 407 F. App'x 762
Docket Number: No. 10-1879
Parties: John Fitzgerald BROWN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. THOMAS SUPPLY COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 407
Pages: 762–763

Head Matter:
John Fitzgerald BROWN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. THOMAS SUPPLY COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 10-1879.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 13, 2011.
Decided: Jan. 18, 2011.
John Fitzgerald Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Edward Justice, Jr., Joseph Jakob Kennedy, Turner Padget Graham & Laney, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
John Fitzgerald Brown appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment in favor of the Defendant in Brown's Title VII action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Thomas Supply Co., Inc., No. 2:08-cv-03124-CWH, 2010 WL 2640498 (D.S.C. July 2, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.