Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Michael Dickens, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1996-10-10
Citations: 88 N.Y.2d 1031
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Dickens, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 88
Pages: 1031–1033

Head Matter:
[673 NE2d 1237, 651 NYS2d 10]
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Dickens, Appellant.
Argued September 5, 1996;
decided October 10, 1996
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
John Gemmill, New York City, and Daniel L. Greenberg, for appellant.
Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney of New York County, New York City (Gregory H. Mansfield and Norman Barclay of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
The grounds defendant now advances for challenging the lawfulness of the search were not presented to the trial court. We therefore conclude that defendant failed to preserve his present claims for this Court's review.
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick concur.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.