Case Name: STATE ex rel ADULT AND FAMILY SERVICES DIVISION, Appellant, v. CARLSON, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1984-08-29
Citations: 69 Or. App. 562
Docket Number: D8111-68633; CA A30160
Parties: STATE ex rel ADULT AND FAMILY SERVICES DIVISION, Appellant, v. CARLSON, Respondent
Judges: Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, Joseph, Chief Judge, and Young, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 69
Pages: 562–563

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted July 20,
reversed and remanded August 29,
reconsideration denied October 19,1984, petition for review denied January 8,1985 (298 Or 470)
STATE ex rel ADULT AND FAMILY SERVICES DIVISION, Appellant, v. CARLSON, Respondent
(D8111-68633; CA A30160)
686 P2d 1043
Christine Chute, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and James E. Mountain, Jr., Solicitor General, Salem.
Daniel Hoarfrost, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Donald D. Nash and Nash & Hoarfrost, Portland.
Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, Joseph, Chief Judge, and Young, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
In this filiation proceeding, the state appeals from a jury verdict in favor of defendant putative father. We agree that one of its assignments of error is well taken: the trial court erred in refusing to admit certain blood test results concerning defendant. The error was not harmless.
Reversed and remanded.