Case Name: Patrick GUSTAVE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patricia R. STANSBERRY, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-02-07
Citations: 121 F. App'x 513
Docket Number: No. 04-7807
Parties: Patrick GUSTAVE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patricia R. STANSBERRY, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before LUTTIG and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 121
Pages: 513–513

Head Matter:
Patrick GUSTAVE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patricia R. STANSBERRY, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 04-7807.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 27, 2005.
Decided: Feb. 7, 2005.
Patrick Gustave, Appellant pro se.
Before LUTTIG and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Patrick Gustave, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Gustave v. Stansberry, No. CA-04-627-H-5 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 21, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED