Case Name: ALBERT THOMAS O'NEIL, SR. v. WILLIAM J. CORRICK AND OTHERS, ALSO KNOWN AS AND d.b.a. CORRICK, MILLER, MEYER & NELSON
Court: Minnesota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Minnesota
Decision Date: 1976-02-06
Citations: 307 Minn. 497
Docket Number: No. 45718
Parties: ALBERT THOMAS O’NEIL, SR. v. WILLIAM J. CORRICK AND OTHERS, ALSO KNOWN AS AND d.b.a. CORRICK, MILLER, MEYER & NELSON.
Judges: Mr. Justice Kelly took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Reporter: Minnesota Reports
Volume: 307
Pages: 497–498

Head Matter:
ALBERT THOMAS O’NEIL, SR. v. WILLIAM J. CORRICK AND OTHERS, ALSO KNOWN AS AND d.b.a. CORRICK, MILLER, MEYER & NELSON.
239 N. W. 2d 230.
February 6, 1976
No. 45718.
Albert Thomas O’Neil, Sr., pro se, for appellant.
Richards, Montgomery, Cobb & Bassford and Lynn G. Truesdell III, for respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This is an appeal by plaintiff, acting as his own attorney, from judgment entered against him in an action against the attorneys who represented his deceased former wife in her divorce suit against him, a suit which ended in settlement. We have carefully examined the record and conclude that the trial court properly dismissed plaintiff's action and granted defendants summary judgment. Plaintiff failed to comply with an order that he either provide full and complete answers to written interrogatories within 30 days or have his action dismissed, and there fore dismissal or default judgment was justified under Rule 37.02 (2) (c), Rules of Civil Procedure.
Affirmed.
Mr. Justice Kelly took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.