Case Name: Howard M. ROSENSTEIN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. The CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1989-09-07
Citations: 884 F.2d 174
Docket Number: No. 87-1888
Parties: Howard M. ROSENSTEIN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. The CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, REAVLEY, POLITZ, KING, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, and DUHE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 884
Pages: 174–174

Head Matter:
Howard M. ROSENSTEIN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. The CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 87-1888.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Sept. 7, 1989.
Sam A. Lindsay, Chandra V. Fripp, Asst. City Attys., Dallas, Tex., for defendant-appellant.
Bruce A. Pauley, Lyon & Lyon, Rowlett, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.

Opinion:
ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, REAVLEY, POLITZ, KING, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, and DUHE, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.