Case Name: Al-Rufus ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEDERATED DEPARTMENT STORES, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Macy's Pentagon City, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-11-15
Citations: 154 F. App'x 353
Docket Number: No. 05-1614
Parties: Al-Rufus ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEDERATED DEPARTMENT STORES, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Macy’s Pentagon City, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before WILLIAMS and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 154
Pages: 353–354

Head Matter:
Al-Rufus ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEDERATED DEPARTMENT STORES, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Macy’s Pentagon City, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 05-1614.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 31, 2005.
Decided: Nov. 15, 2005.
Al-Rufus Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin Cairns Eggert, Ross, Dixon & Bell, L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Before WILLIAMS and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Al-Rufus Anderson appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reconsideration of the district court's order dismissing his civil action as frivolous and for failure 'to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion or reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Anderson v. Federated Dep't Stores, No. CA-04-1138-1-TSE (E.D. Va. filed May 11, 2005; entered May 17, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED