Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Tajuan Paul, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2017-03-24
Citations: 148 A.D.3d 1723
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tajuan Paul, Appellant.
Judges: Present — Whalen, P.J., Smith, Lindley, Troutman and Scudder, JJ.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 148
Pages: 1723–1723

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tajuan Paul, Appellant.
[49 NYS3d 324]

Opinion:
Motion for writ of error coram nobis granted. Memorandum: Defendant contends that he was denied effective assistance of appellate counsel because counsel failed to raise an issue on direct appeal, specifically, whether the Antommarchi waiver proffered by the attorney for defendant was valid. Upon our review of the motion papers, we conclude that the issue may have merit. The order of October 1, 2002 is vacated and this Court will consider the appeal de novo (see People v LeFrois, 151 AD2d 1046 [1989]). Defendant is directed to file and serve his records and briefs with this Court on or before July 24, 2017.
Present — Whalen, P.J., Smith, Lindley, Troutman and Scudder, JJ.