Case Name: Laur & Mack Contracting Co., Inc., Appellant, v. Dino Di Cienzo, Sr., et al., Respondents; Laur & Mack Contracting Co., Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Russell Associates, Also Known as Office of Edward D. Russell, Architect, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2001-07-10
Citations: 96 N.Y.2d 895
Docket Number: 
Parties: Laur & Mack Contracting Co., Inc., Appellant, v Dino Di Cienzo, Sr., et al., Respondents. Laur & Mack Contracting Co., Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v Russell Associates, Also Known as Office of Edward D. Russell, Architect, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 96
Pages: 895–895

Head Matter:
Laur & Mack Contracting Co., Inc., Appellant, v Dino Di Cienzo, Sr., et al., Respondents. Laur & Mack Contracting Co., Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v Russell Associates, Also Known as Office of Edward D. Russell, Architect, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
Submitted May 29, 2001;
decided July 10, 2001

Opinion:
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal as against Russell Associates, denied; motion for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.