Case Name: State of Nebraska, appellee, v. Russell P. Twiss, appellant
Court: Nebraska Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Nebraska
Decision Date: 1974-10-03
Citations: 192 Neb. 402
Docket Number: No. 39415
Parties: State of Nebraska, appellee, v. Russell P. Twiss, appellant.
Judges: Heard before White, C. J., Spencer, Boslaugh, McCown, Newton, Clinton, and Brodkey, JJ.
Reporter: Nebraska Reports
Volume: 192
Pages: 402–402

Head Matter:
State of Nebraska, appellee, v. Russell P. Twiss, appellant.
222 N. W. 2d 108
Filed October 3, 1974.
No. 39415.
■ Fisher & Fisher, for appellant.
Clarence A. H. Meyer, Attorney General, and Steven C. Smith, for appellee.
Heard before White, C. J., Spencer, Boslaugh, McCown, Newton, Clinton, and Brodkey, JJ.

Opinion:
Newton, J.
Defendant was arrested for operating a motor vehicle while under the: influence of alcoholic liquor and subsequently the operator's license of defendant was revoked for refusal to take a blood, breath, or urine test. The order of revocation was appealed.
The record discloses that the requirements of section 39-727.03 (2), (4), and (5), R. S. Supp., 1972, were complied with and defendant was given the choice of taking a breath, blood, or urine test. Defendant refused to take a test. Defendant insists that after he had refused to take a test, it was incumbent upon the arresting officer to again advise the defendant of the consequences of failing to take the test.
Section 39-727.03 (5), R. S. Supp., 1972, requires that any "person who is required to submit to a chemical blood, breath or urine test shall be advised of the consequences of refusing to submit to such test." This admonition was given- but we fail to find any statutory requirement that it be repeated after a defendant refuses to take the test. The proposition advanced is without merit.
The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
Affirmed.