Case Name: David H. Houghtaling, Resp't, v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Company App'lt
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1893-11-17
Citations: 57 N.Y. St. Rep. 117
Docket Number: 
Parties: David H. Houghtaling, Resp’t, v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Company App’lt.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 57
Pages: 117–118

Head Matter:
David H. Houghtaling, Resp’t, v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Company App’lt.
(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department,
Filed November 17, 1893.)
Hawkins & Delafield {M D. Hawkins, of counsel), for app'lt; Cambers & Baughton, (W. P. Chambers, of counsel), for resp't

Opinion:
Van Brunt, P. J.
For the reasons stated in the case of Bryce v. Same Defendant, 57 St. Rep., 116 (decided herewith), the judgment should be affirmed, with costs, with leave to withdraw the demurrer, and answer, on payment of the costs and disbursements of the appeal, and costs in the court below. All concur.