Case Name: EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CATASTROPHE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-12-05
Citations: 876 F.3d 1273
Docket Number: No. 14-13482
Parties: EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CATASTROPHE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, HULL, MARCUS, WILSON, WILLIAM PRYOR, MARTIN, JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, JULIE CARNES, and JILL PRYOR,- Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 876
Pages: 1273–1290

Head Matter:
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CATASTROPHE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 14-13482
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Date Filed: 12/05/2017
Paula Rene’ Bruner, Jeremy D. Horowitz, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Office of General Counsel-Appellate Services, Washington, DC, Julie Bean, Marsha Lynn Rucker, C.'Emanuel Smith, EEOC, Birmingham, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
David James Middlebropks, Whitney Ryan Brown, Lehr Middlebrooks <& Vree-land, PC, Birmingham, AL, Thomas M. Johnson, Jr., Eugene Scalia, Helgi C. Walker, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, LLP, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee.
Joshua P. Thompson, Pacific Legal Foundation, Sacramento, CA, for Amicus Curiae Pacific Legal Foundation.
William S. Consovoy, Consovoy McCarthy, PLLC, Arlington, VA, for Amicus Curiae Chamber Of Commerce of the United States of America.
Rachel Kleinman, Christina Swarns, I, NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc., New York, NY, for Amicus Curiae NAACP Legal Defense.
Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, HULL, MARCUS, WILSON, WILLIAM PRYOR, MARTIN, JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, JULIE CARNES, and JILL PRYOR,- Circuit Judges.
Judge Kevin C. Newsom, who joined the Court on August 4, 2017, did not participate in the en banc poll that was conducted in this case.

Opinion:
BY THE COURT:
A petition for rehearing ' having been filed and a member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard by the Court sitting.en banc, and a majority of the judges in active service on this Court having voted against granting a rehearing en banc, it is ORDERED that this case will not be reheard en banc.