Case Name: Helen Thompson, Appellant, v. James Thompson, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1938-10-28
Citations: 255 A.D. 814
Docket Number: 
Parties: Helen Thompson, Appellant, v. James Thompson, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 255
Pages: 814–815

Head Matter:
Helen Thompson, Appellant, v. James Thompson, Respondent.

Opinion:
In an action to annul a marriage on the ground of fraudulent representations, judgment in favor of defendant reversed on the law, without costs, and judgment directed for plaintiff as prayed for in the complaint, without costs. Conclusions of law disapproved; new conclusions will be made. The facts as found, to which no exception is taken, provide an adequate basis for concluding that plaintiff is entitled to a decree. (Shonfeld v. Shonfeld, 260 N. Y. 477; di Lorenzo v. di Lorenzo, 174 id. 467.) Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents on the ground that the record is incomplete and a determination cannot be made thereon. — Settle order on notice.