Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. LAWRENCE BRADLEY MILLIGAN, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1986-10-08
Citations: 81 Or. App. 525
Docket Number: CR 83-475; CA A36635
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. LAWRENCE BRADLEY MILLIGAN, Appellant.
Judges: Before Warden, Presiding Judge, and Van Hoomissen and Young, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 81
Pages: 525–526

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted August 25,
reversed and remanded for new trial October 8, 1986
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. LAWRENCE BRADLEY MILLIGAN, Appellant.
(CR 83-475; CA A36635)
725 P2d 1299
John Henry Hingson, III, Oregon City, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.
Thomas H. Denney, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.
Before Warden, Presiding Judge, and Van Hoomissen and Young, Judges.
PER CURIAM
Van Hoomissen, J., dissenting.

Opinion:
VAN HOOMISSEN, J.,
dissenting.
I respectfully dissent for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in State v. Westlund, 75 Or App 43, 53, 705 P2d 208, rev allowed 300 Or 332 (1985). Further, in my opinion, State v. Langevin, 78 Or App 311, 715 P2d 1355 (1986), is an unwarranted extension of Westlund.