Case Name: Gerald O. DEEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HOME DEPOT USA, INCORPORATED; Estes Express Lines, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-10-25
Citations: 399 F. App'x 786
Docket Number: No. 10-1727
Parties: Gerald O. DEEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HOME DEPOT USA, INCORPORATED; Estes Express Lines, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 399
Pages: 786–787

Head Matter:
Gerald O. DEEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HOME DEPOT USA, INCORPORATED; Estes Express Lines, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 10-1727.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 19, 2010.
Decided: Oct. 25, 2010.
Gerald O. Deel, Appellant Pro Se. Larry Dwight Floyd, Jr., Lawrence Michael Hershon, Parker, Poe, Adams & Bernstein, LLP, Columbia, South Carolina; Charles Edward Raynal, IV, Parker, Poe, Adams & Bernstein, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; Thomas Lynn Ogburn, III, Poy-ner Spruill, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Gerald O. Deel appeals the district court's order adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Deel v. Home Depot USA, Inc., No. 7:09-cv-02817-GRA, 2010 WL 2196272 (D.S.C. filed May 26, 2010 & entered May 27, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.