Case Name: Cory SHAW, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2013-02-26
Citations: 392 S.W.3d 535
Docket Number: No. ED 98310
Parties: Cory SHAW, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 392
Pages: 535–536

Head Matter:
Cory SHAW, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 98310.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Feb. 26, 2013.
Jessica Hathaway, St. Louis, MO, for Movant/Appellant.
Dora A. Fichter, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent/Respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Cory Shaw appeals from the motion court's judgment denying, without an evi-dentiary hearing, his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 24.035. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2008, unless otherwise indicated.