Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. PHILLIP E. CORCORAN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2007-09-19
Citations: 215 Or. App. 107
Docket Number: 030067CR; A127120
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. PHILLIP E. CORCORAN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Armstrong and Rosenblum, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 215
Pages: 107–108

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted August 17,
compensatory fine vacated; case remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed September 19, 2007
STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. PHILLIP E. CORCORAN, Defendant-Appellant.
Lake County Circuit Court
030067CR; A127120
168 P3d 335
David E. Groom argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.
Ryan Kahn, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.
Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Armstrong and Rosenblum, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant appeals from his conviction for sex abuse in the third degree, ORS 163.415. He assigns error to (1) the denial of his motion for a judgment of acquittal, (2) the denial of his motion for a new trial, (3) the imposition of a compensatory fine, and (4) the imposition of a probation condition that defendant undergo sexual offender treatment. We reject, without discussion, defendant's first, second, and fourth assignments of error. With respect to the third assignment of error, the state concedes that the record is devoid of any evidence supporting the imposition of a compensatory fine. That concession is well-founded, see State v. Donahue, 165 Or App 143, 995 P2d 1202 (2000); accordingly, we vacate the imposition of the compensatory fine.
Compensatory fine vacated; case remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.