Case Name: George SCHILLINGER and Nancy Schillinger, Respondents, v. John D. SCHNEIER, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2013-01-08
Citations: 391 S.W.3d 887
Docket Number: No. ED 98001
Parties: George SCHILLINGER and Nancy Schillinger, Respondents, v. John D. SCHNEIER, Appellant.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE K. CRANE, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and LISA VAN AMBURG, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 391
Pages: 887–887

Head Matter:
George SCHILLINGER and Nancy Schillinger, Respondents, v. John D. SCHNEIER, Appellant.
No. ED 98001.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Jan. 8, 2013.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Feb. 21, 2013.
Thomas Blumeyer Weaver, Armstrong, Teasdale, LLP, Clayton, MO, Christopher Robert LaRose, Co-Counsel, Armstrong, Teasdale, LLP, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Timothy E. Hogan, Carla J. Zolman, LLC, St. Louis, MO, for Respondents.
Before KATHIANNE K. CRANE, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and LISA VAN AMBURG, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
John D. Schneier appeals from the judgment, entered on December 8, 2011, reviving judgments entered in 2000 and 2001 against him and in favor of George and Nancy Schillinger. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).