Case Name: Larnette M. WESTBROOK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-10-26
Citations: 252 F. App'x 542
Docket Number: No. 07-7271
Parties: Larnette M. WESTBROOK, Petitioner—Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent—Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 252
Pages: 542–543

Head Matter:
Larnette M. WESTBROOK, Petitioner—Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent—Appellee.
No. 07-7271.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 18, 2007.
Decided: Oct. 26, 2007.
Larnette M. Westbrook, Appellant Pro Se. Betsy S. Jividen, Assistant United States Attorney, Helen Campbell Altmeyer, Office of the United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Larnette M. Westbrook, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. Because Westbrook's general objections failed to object to the findings made by the magistrate judge with sufficient specificity, we conclude he has waived appellate review of his claims. See United States v. Midgette, 478 F.Sd 616, 622 (4th Cir.2007). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.