Case Name: Shirley TAPLIN, Appellant, v. Sol TAPLIN, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1978-08-22
Citations: 361 So. 2d 827
Docket Number: No. 77-1742
Parties: Shirley TAPLIN, Appellant, v. Sol TAPLIN, Appellee.
Judges: Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 361
Pages: 827–827

Head Matter:
Shirley TAPLIN, Appellant, v. Sol TAPLIN, Appellee.
No. 77-1742.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Aug. 22, 1978.
Snyder, Young, Stern, Barrett & Tan-nenbaum and William L. Rogers, North Miami Beach, for appellant.
Podhurst, Orseck & Parks and Joel D. Eaton, Miami, for appellee.
Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellant wife appeals an order denying her petition for modification and her petition for attorney's fees. She urges error upon the argument that the manifest weight of the evidence established her need for, and the husband's ability to respond to, an increase in alimony. We find that no error has been shown. See Herzog v. Herzog, 346 So.2d 56 (Fla.1977); and Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So.2d 13 (Fla.1976).
Affirmed.