Case Name: Benoit Joseph Jean TARDIF, et al., Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-12-10
Citations: 589 So. 2d 1040
Docket Number: Nos. 90-2210, 90-2714
Parties: Benoit Joseph Jean TARDIF, et al., Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, GERSTEN and GODERICH, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 589
Pages: 1040–1041

Head Matter:
Benoit Joseph Jean TARDIF, et al., Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Nos. 90-2210, 90-2714.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 10, 1991.
Alan Jay Braverman, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant Tardif.
Sonnett Sale & Kuehne and Benedict P. Kuehne, Miami, for appellant Miller,
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Monique T. Befeler, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before BARKDULL, GERSTEN and GODERICH, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We reverse based on the authorities of Amado v. State, 585 So.2d 282 (Fla.1991) and Essex v. State, 539 So.2d 559 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).
We find that the remaining points raised by the defendants lack merit.
Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a new trial.