Case Name: Hugo MIRANDA, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2016-01-14
Citations: 181 So. 3d 1188
Docket Number: No. SC14-888
Parties: Hugo MIRANDA, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 181
Pages: 1188–1189

Head Matter:
Hugo MIRANDA, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. SC14-888.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Jan. 14, 2016.
Carlos Jesus Martinez, Public Defender, and John Eddy Morrison, Assistant Public Defender, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami, FL, for Petitioner.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, FL; Richard L. Polin, Bureau Chief, Douglas James Glaid, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Jonathan David Ta-noos, Assistant Attorney General, and Jeffrey Robert Geldens, Assistant Attorney General, Miami, FL, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the Third District Court of Appeal in State v. Miranda, 137 So.3d 1133 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. After further consideration, we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss this review proceeding.
It is so ordered.
NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.
LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur.