Case Name: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Salvador MORALES, Petitioner
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2010-02-03
Citations: 605 Pa. 254
Docket Number: No. 147 EM 2009
Parties: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Salvador MORALES, Petitioner.
Judges: 
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 605
Pages: 254–254

Head Matter:
988 A.2d 1287
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Salvador MORALES, Petitioner.
No. 147 EM 2009.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Feb. 3, 2010.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 3rd day of February, 2010, the Petition for Leave to File Notice of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DISMISSED. As Petitioner's filing is not a request for mandamus relief, this matter was improperly transferred from the Superior Court on that basis. To the extent that Petitioner seeks reinstatement nunc pro time of his right to appeal to the Superior Court from the Post Conviction Relief Act ("PCRA") court's order, the proper vehicle to make that request, if any, is a subsequent PCRA petition filed in the PCRA court. Cf. Kendrick v. District Attorney Of Philadelphia County, 591 Pa. 157, 916 A.2d 529, 537 (2007).