Case Name: Laveria Ann KNOWLES a/k/a Laveria Knowles, Appellant, v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON f/k/a The Bank of New York, as Trustee for the Certificateholders CWALT, Inc. Alternative Loan Trust 2006-OA6 Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2006-OA6, Lake Shore Village Neighborhood Association, Inc., Unknown Tenant No. 1, and Unknown Tenant No. 2, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2016-03-30
Citations: 186 So. 3d 1147
Docket Number: No. 4D15-630
Parties: Laveria Ann KNOWLES a/k/a Laveria Knowles, Appellant, v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON f/k/a The Bank of New York, as Trustee for the Certificateholders CWALT, Inc. Alternative Loan Trust 2006-OA6 Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2006-OA6, Lake Shore Village Neighborhood Association, Inc., Unknown Tenant No. 1, and Unknown Tenant No. 2, Appellees.
Judges: CIKLIN, C.J., MAY and GERBER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 186
Pages: 1147–1147

Head Matter:
Laveria Ann KNOWLES a/k/a Laveria Knowles, Appellant, v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON f/k/a The Bank of New York, as Trustee for the Certificateholders CWALT, Inc. Alternative Loan Trust 2006-OA6 Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2006-OA6, Lake Shore Village Neighborhood Association, Inc., Unknown Tenant No. 1, and Unknown Tenant No. 2, Appellees.
No. 4D15-630.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
March 30, 2016.
Thomas Erskine Ice of Ice Appellate, Royal Palm Beach, for appellant.
Heidi J. Bassett of Robertson, Anschutz & Schneid, P.L., Boca Raton, for appellee The Bank of New York Mellon.

Opinion:
ON CONCESSION OF ERROR
PER CURIAM.
The bank properly concedes that the trial court erred in entering a final judgment of foreclosure. The bank's concession is based upon case law which this court issued after the trial. See Jelic v. LaSalle Bank, Nat'l Ass'n, 160 So.3d 127, 130 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015): (reversing a final judgment of foreclosure, in part because there was no evidence that the party transferring the note into the trust had any intent to transfer ah interest to the trustee); and Balch v, LaSalle Bank NA., 171 So.3d 207, 209 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (reversing a final judgment of foreclosure, in part because "evidence that the note was transferred into the trust prior to the foreclosure action is insufficient' by itself to confer standing because there was no evidence that the indorsee had the intent to transfer any interest to the trustee").
Contrary .to the bank's request that we remand this case for a new trial, the proper remedy, as in both Jelic and Balch, is remand for entry of an involuntary dismissal. Jelic, 160 So.3d at 130; Balch, 171 So.3d at 209.
Reversed and remanded for entry of involuntary dismissal,
CIKLIN, C.J., MAY and GERBER, JJ., concur.