Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Trevor LITTLE, a/k/a Trag, a/k/a Tragedy, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-08-10
Citations: 15 F. App'x 167
Docket Number: No. 01-6459
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Trevor LITTLE, a/k/a Trag, a/k/a Tragedy, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 15
Pages: 167–168

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Trevor LITTLE, a/k/a Trag, a/k/a Tragedy, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 01-6459.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 26, 2001.
Decided Aug. 10, 2001.
Trevor Little, pro se. Michael Lee Keller, Monica Kaminski Schwartz, Office of the United States Attorney, Charleston, WV, for appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Trevor Little appeals the district court's order denying relief on his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for relief from judgment. We have reviewed the record and Little's informal brief and find that Little is not entitled to relief because the case upon which he relies, Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 478, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000), does not call into question the va lidity of the denial of a certifícate of appealability in Little's prior appeal. See United States v. Little, No. 99-7489, 205 F.3d 1335, 2000 WL 201575 (4th Cir. Feb.22, 2000) (unpublished). Accordingly, we deny Little's motion to proceed in for-ma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.