Case Name: CHARLES MATTHEWS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PUBLIC SERVICE INTERSTATE TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1943-09-16
Citations: 130 N.J.L. 495
Docket Number: 
Parties: CHARLES MATTHEWS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PUBLIC SERVICE INTERSTATE TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 130
Pages: 495–496

Head Matter:
CHARLES MATTHEWS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PUBLIC SERVICE INTERSTATE TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Submitted May 28, 1943
Decided September 16, 1943.
For the plaintiff-appellant, Theodore F. French.
For the defendant-respondent, William H. Speer (Henry J. Sorenson, of counsel; Henry H. Fryling, attorney of record).

Opinion:
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Campbell, Chancellor.
This is an action in tort, seeking damages said to have been caused by the respondent in the negligent operation of a bus.
The cause was tried in the Supreme Court, Camden Circuit, and resulted in a verdict for the appellant.
A rule to show cause why this verdict should not be set aside and a new trial had was obtained by the defendant-respondent and, after argument, was made absolute and a new trial ordered. Thereupon this appeal was taken "from the order setting aside the verdict of the jury" and the sole ground assigned is that there was an abuse of discretion.
By a statute entitled "An act to regulate writs of error," February, 1788 (Paterson's Laws of New Jersey, 345, 346), carried down into R. S. 2:27-349, no writ of error (now appeal) lies to this court "until final judgment."
This is the definite and settled practice, Kople v. Zalon, 122 N. J. L. 422; Nelson v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 128 Id. 46.
An order disposing of a rule to show cause why a verdict should not be set aside and a new trial had, is not a final judgment and therefore not appealable, Kople v. Zalon, supra; Trovalo v. Capozzi, 119 N. J. L. 147.
Abuse of discretion in disposing of such a rule, to be urged as a ground for error, must, therefore, await final judgment.
The entire subject is fully treated and definitely disposed of by Trovato v. Capozzi; Kople v. Zalon, and Nelson v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., supra, and the cases cited therein.
The appeal is dismissed, with costs.
For dismissal — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Colie, Dear, Wells, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, Dill, JJ. 16.