Case Name: Marcellus S. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-04-20
Citations: 135 S.W.3d 503
Docket Number: No. ED 83397
Parties: Marcellus S. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., and MARY R. RUSSELL, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 135
Pages: 503–504

Head Matter:
Marcellus S. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 83397.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
April 20, 2004.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 26, 2004.
Marcellus S. Williams, Mineral Point, MO, Pro Se, for appellant.
Andrea Kaye Spillars, Breck K. Burgess, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., and MARY R. RUSSELL, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Marcellus S. Williams ("Movant") appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing. He seeks to vacate his convictions and sentences for robbery in the first degree, armed criminal action, two counts of false imprisonment, and stealing a motor vehicle. He was sentenced as a persistent felony offender to a total term of 64 years to run consecutive to a previously imposed sentence.
Movant raises 10 points and 26 sub-points on appeal that allege that he received ineffective assistance of counsel on his direct appeal. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court's determination was not erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).