Case Name: H. JAY SPIEGEL & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Steven M. SPIEGEL, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-11-08
Citations: 400 F. App'x 757
Docket Number: No. 09-2127
Parties: H. JAY SPIEGEL & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Steven M. SPIEGEL, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before DUNCAN, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 400
Pages: 757–758

Head Matter:
H. JAY SPIEGEL & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Steven M. SPIEGEL, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 09-2127.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 14, 2010.
Decided: Nov. 8, 2010.
H. Jay Spiegel, Appellant Pro Se. Steven M. Spiegel, Appellee Pro Se.
Before DUNCAN, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
H. Jay Spiegel appeals the district court's order entering judgment against him on his trademark infringement claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. H. Jay Spiegel & Assocs. v. Spiegel, 652 F.Supp.2d 639 (E.D.Va.2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.