Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ivan MAGDALENO, Defendant-Appellant; United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ivan Magdaleno, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-04-05
Citations: 372 F. App'x 372
Docket Number: Nos. 09-8191, 10-6254
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ivan MAGDALENO, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ivan Magdaleno, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 372
Pages: 372–372

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ivan MAGDALENO, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ivan Magdaleno, Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 09-8191, 10-6254.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 30, 2010.
Decided: April 5, 2010.
Ivan Magdaleno, Appellant Pro Se. Jimmie Ewing, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appel-lee.
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ivan Magdaleno appeals the district court's orders denying his motion for specific performance of his plea agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b), his motion for reconsideration of that denial, and his motion to reopen the case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Magdaleno, No. 7:06-cr00703-GRA-2, 2009 WL 4432577 (D.S.C. Nov. 9, 2009; Nov. 25, 2009); 2010 WL 360508 (Jan. 26, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.