Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Andrew Spotted ELK, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-08-24
Citations: 612 F. App'x 864
Docket Number: No. 15-1941
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Andrew Spotted ELK, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WOLLMAN, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 612
Pages: 864–864

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Andrew Spotted ELK, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-1941.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 19, 2015.
Filed: Aug. 24, 2015.
Timothy Marshall, Maher Carrie Sand-erson, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Pierre, SD, for Plaintiff-Appelle'e.
Jana Miner, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Pierre, SD, for Defendant-Appellant.
Andrew Spotted Elk, Sioux Falls, SD, pro se.
Before WOLLMAN, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Andrew Spotted Elk directly appeals the senténce that the district court imposed upon revoking his supervised release, arguing that his six-month prison sentence is substantively unreasonable. Upon careful review, see United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 915-16 (8th Cir.2009) (appellate review of revocation sentence), we conclude that the within-Guidelines-range sentence is not substantively unreasonable, see United States v. Petreikis, 551 F.3d 822, 824 (8th Cir.2009). We grant counsel's motion to withdraw. The judgment is affirmed.
. The Honorable Roberto A. Lange, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota.