Case Name: Arthur O. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KOURY CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee; Arthur O. Armstrong, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Koury Corporation, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-08-08
Citations: 15 F. App'x 157
Docket Number: Nos. 01-1294, 01-1574
Parties: Arthur O. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KOURY CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. Arthur O. Armstrong, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Koury Corporation, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 15
Pages: 157–157

Head Matter:
Arthur O. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KOURY CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. Arthur O. Armstrong, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Koury Corporation, Defendant-Appellee.
Nos. 01-1294, 01-1574.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 24, 2001.
Decided Aug. 8, 2001.
Arthur O. Armstrong, pro se. Jonathan A. Berkelhammer, Laura Deddish Burton, Smith, Helms, Mulliss & Moore, L.L.P., Greensboro, NC, for appellee.
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In these consolidated appeals, Arthur O. Armstrong appeals district court orders amending an injunction and denying his motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. We have reviewed the record and the district court orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and for summary judgment and dismiss the appeals as frivolous. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.