Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. RICHARD LEE GRIFFIN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2007-11-28
Citations: 216 Or. App. 322
Docket Number: CFH030113; A127751
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. RICHARD LEE GRIFFIN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Armstrong and Rosenblum, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 216
Pages: 322–323

Head Matter:
Submitted on record and briefs October 31,
reversed and remanded November 28, 2007
STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. RICHARD LEE GRIFFIN, Defendant-Appellant.
Umatilla County Circuit Court
CFH030113; A127751
172 P3d 284
Peter Ozanne, Executive Director, and Shawn Wiley, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Anna M. Joyce, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Armstrong and Rosenblum, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of .a controlled substance, former ORS 475.992 (2003), arguing that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence found in a backpack, and further arguing that the court erred in admitting into evidence a laboratory report pursuant to ORS 475.235. We reject without discussion defendant's arguments concerning the denial of his motion to suppress. Concerning the admission of the lab report into evidence, the state concedes that defendant is entitled to a reversal in light of the holding of State v. Birchfield, 342 Or 624, 157 P3d 216 (2007). We agree and accept the state's concession.
Reversed and remanded.