Case Name: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GENERAL HOST CORPORATION et al., Defendants, Seymour M. Lazar, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1975-01-10
Citations: 508 F.2d 1332
Docket Number: No. 34, Docket 73-2617
Parties: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GENERAL HOST CORPORATION et al., Defendants, Seymour M. Lazar, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 508
Pages: 1332–1332

Head Matter:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GENERAL HOST CORPORATION et al., Defendants, Seymour M. Lazar, Appellant.
No. 34, Docket 73-2617.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued Jan. 9, 1975.
Decided Jan. 10, 1975.
Paul C. Warnke, Washington, D. C. (George Rowe, Jr., New York City, on the brief), for appellant.
Paul Gonson, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Securities and Exchange Commission (Lawrence E. Nerheim, David Ferber, and Thomas L. Taylor III, Securities and Exchange Commission, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee.
Before KAUFMAN, Chief Judge, and SMITH and TIMBERS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
We believe that Judge Weinfeld correctly interpreted rule 13(g) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in light of the considerations expressed in our decision in SEC v. Everest Management Corp., 475 F.2d 1236 (2d Cir. 1972). Accordingly, we affirm on his opinion, 60 F.R.D. 640 (S.D.N.Y.1973).