Case Name: Leandro PEREZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2012-01-27
Citations: 79 So. 3d 132
Docket Number: No. 2D11-2461
Parties: Leandro PEREZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: WALLACE, KHOUZAM, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 79
Pages: 132–133

Head Matter:
Leandro PEREZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D11-2461.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Jan. 27, 2012.
Carl J. Dicampli of Lorenzo and Lorenzo, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Leandro Perez appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, which the postconviction court denied. We affirm. See Barrios-Cruz v. State, 63 So.3d 868 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011). As in Barrios-Cruz, 63 So.3d at 870, we hold that Padilla v. Kentucky, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), does not apply retroactively in post-conviction proceedings, and we certify to the Florida Supreme Court the following question of great public importance pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(a)(2)(A)(v):
SHOULD THE RULING IN Padilla v. Kentucky, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), BE APPLIED RETROACTIVELY IN POSTCONVICTION PROCEEDINGS?
Affirmed.
WALLACE, KHOUZAM, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.