Case Name: JOHN REPOSA, Respondent, v. CARLOS PEARCE, Appellant
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1936-01-30
Citations: 11 Cal. App. 2d 520
Docket Number: Civ. No. 9934
Parties: JOHN REPOSA, Respondent, v. CARLOS PEARCE, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports, Second Series
Volume: 11
Pages: 520–520

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 9934.
First Appellate District, Division Two.
January 30, 1936.]
JOHN REPOSA, Respondent, v. CARLOS PEARCE, Appellant.
J. E. McCurdy and F. E. Hoffman for Appellant.
Larrouy & Macdonald for Eespondent.

Opinion:
NOUESE, P. J.
This is an appeal from an order amending a bill of exceptions in Reposa v. Pearce, No. 9829 (ante, p. 517 [54 Pac. (2d) 475]). The amendment was made to include the original statements of indebtedness included in the plaintiff's claim for special damages. Because of the judgment in the main case holding that plaintiff was not entitled to any damages, the question raised here has become moot.
For these reasons the appeal is dismissed.
Sturtevant, J., and Spence, J., concurred.