Case Name: The Weehawken Wharf Co., Respondent, v. The Knickerbocker Coal Co., Appellant
Court: New York City Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1898-02
Citations: 22 Misc. 768
Docket Number: 
Parties: The Weehawken Wharf Co., Respondent, v. The Knickerbocker Coal Co., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 22
Pages: 768–768

Head Matter:
The Weehawken Wharf Co., Respondent, v. The Knickerbocker Coal Co., Appellant.
Appeal from an order vacating an attachment.
Edwards & Bryan, for appellant.
James R. Rogers, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This is an appeal from an order denying the defendant's motion to vacate the attachment the
The order appealed from must be affirmed, with costs.' . The papers upon which said attachment'was. granted were more than: sufficient.
Present: Fitzsimons, Oh. J., O'Dwveb and MoGabthy, JJ.
Order affirmed,, with costs.