Case Name: WILBURN GARVIN v. THE UNITED STATES
Court: United States Court of Claims
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1953-04-07
Citations: 124 Ct. Cl. 781
Docket Number: No. 558-52
Parties: WILBURN GARVIN v. THE UNITED STATES
Judges: Howell, Judge; Madden, Judge; Whitaker, Judge; and Littleton, Judge, concur.
Reporter: United States Court of Claims Reports
Volume: 124
Pages: 781–782

Head Matter:
WILBURN GARVIN v. THE UNITED STATES
[No. 558-52.
Decided April 7, 1953]
Mr. Wilburn Garvin fro se.
Mr. John A. Reese, with whom was Mr. Assistant Attorney General H. Brian Holland, for defendant. Mr. Andrew D. Sharfe was on the briefs.

Opinion:
Jones, Chief Judge,
delivered the opinion of the court:
This is a claim for refund of income taxes withheld from earnings of plaintiff during the years 1945, 1946 and 1947. Plaintiff filed neither an income tax return nor claim for refund for the periods mentioned above until June 1, 1951, when Treasury Department forms 1040 (A) were filed with the Collector of Internal Revenue, Chicago', Illinois. The Collector thereupon advised plaintiff that section 322' (b) (1) precluded any refund. The petition was filed in this court on November 6,1952 and defendant has moved to dismiss.
The controlling provision of the Internal Revenue Code in the instant case is section 322 (b) (2) of Title 26, United States Code. This section prohibits the payment of any refund in excess of the portion of the tax paid during the three years immediately preceding the filing of the claim.
The facts of the case now before us fall squarely within the situation contemplated by the provision mentioned above. On filing Treasury Department form 1040 (A) on June 1, 1951, plaintiff simultaneously filed a claim for refund. The statute clearly states that "The amount of the refund shall not exceed the portion of the tax paid during the three years immediately preceding the filing of the claim." In this instance, any refund could not exceed the portion of the tax paid since Juné 1,. 1948. Since all alleged overpayments here in question are for years prior to 1948, any recovery by plaintiff is precluded by the statute. The only allegations designed to excuse the late filing of the claim for refund are to the effect that plaintiff was evading arrest by law enforcement agencies during the period in question. This would not justify us in disregarding the legislative mandate defining the period during which refunds of taxes withheld may be obtained.
Defendant's motion is granted and the petition is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
Howell, Judge; Madden, Judge; Whitaker, Judge; and Littleton, Judge, concur.
The amount of the credit or refund shall not exceed the portion of the tax paid—
(A). If a return is filed by the taxpayer, and the claim is filed within three years from the time the return is filed, during the three years immediately preceding the filing of the claim. [See Senate Report No. 1631, 77th Congress, 2d session, p. 155.]