Case Name: Erwin L. GREEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Debra W. YANG, U.S. Attorney, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-09-25
Citations: 203 F. App'x 11
Docket Number: No. 06-55523
Parties: Erwin L. GREEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Debra W. YANG, U.S. Attorney, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before: O’SCANNLAIN, GRABER and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 203
Pages: 11–12

Head Matter:
Erwin L. GREEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Debra W. YANG, U.S. Attorney, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 06-55523.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 18, 2006.
Filed Sept. 25, 2006.
Erwin L. Green, Huntington Park, CA, pro se.
USLA — Office of the U.S. Attorney Civil & Tax Divisions, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, GRABER and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
A review of the record and the opening brief indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment. See Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409, 431, 96 S.Ct. 984, 47 L.Ed.2d 128 (1976); Ross v. U.S. Attorney's Office, 511 F.2d 524 (9th Cir.1975).
Appellant's motion for sanctions is denied.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.