Case Name: Michael J. GREENE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William J. SADLER; George V. Sitler; William O. (Bill) Huffman; Scott A. Ash, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-01-18
Citations: 673 F. App'x 324
Docket Number: No. 16-7087
Parties: Michael J. GREENE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William J. SADLER; George V. Sitler; William O. (Bill) Huffman; Scott A. Ash, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 673
Pages: 324–325

Head Matter:
Michael J. GREENE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William J. SADLER; George V. Sitler; William O. (Bill) Huffman; Scott A. Ash, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-7087
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: December 30, 2016
Decided: January 18, 2017
Michael J. Greene, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MOTZ, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael J. Greene appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Greene's complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012). On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Greene's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, Greene has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We deny Greene's motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED