Case Name: Richard HANNA, Claimant-Respondent, v. McDONNELL DOUGLAS AEROSPACE, Employer-Appellant, and Industrial Indemnity, Insurer
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-05-26
Citations: 967 S.W.2d 724
Docket Number: No. 73120
Parties: Richard HANNA, Claimant-Respondent, v. McDONNELL DOUGLAS AEROSPACE, Employer-Appellant, and Industrial Indemnity, Insurer.
Judges: Before AHRENS, P.J., and CRANDALL and KAROHL, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 967
Pages: 724–724

Head Matter:
Richard HANNA, Claimant-Respondent, v. McDONNELL DOUGLAS AEROSPACE, Employer-Appellant, and Industrial Indemnity, Insurer.
No. 73120.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
May 26, 1998.
Evans & Dixon, George T. Floros, St. Louis, for employer-appellant.
James J. Sievers, Clayton, for employee-respondent.
Before AHRENS, P.J., and CRANDALL and KAROHL, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Employer appeals workers' compensation awards. The awards are supported by competent and substantial evidence and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).