Case Name: DIOCESE OF METUCHEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. PRISCO & EDWARDS, ALA ETC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND PRISCO & EDWARDS, AIA, ETC., ET AL., THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. REMINGTON & VERNICK ENGINEERS, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-MOVANT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 2004-03-11
Citations: 179 N.J. 305
Docket Number: 
Parties: DIOCESE OF METUCHEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. PRISCO & EDWARDS, ALA ETC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND PRISCO & EDWARDS, AIA, ETC., ET AL., THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. REMINGTON & VERNICK ENGINEERS, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-MOVANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 179
Pages: 305–305

Head Matter:
845 A.2d 132
DIOCESE OF METUCHEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. PRISCO & EDWARDS, ALA ETC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND PRISCO & EDWARDS, AIA, ETC., ET AL., THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. REMINGTON & VERNICK ENGINEERS, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-MOVANT.
March 11, 2004.

Opinion:
ORDERED that the motion for leave to appeal is granted, and the matter is summarily remanded to the Appellate Division to consider the appeal on the merits.