Case Name: Rosedale Hutterian Brethren, Inc., Respondent, v. Harold Cornell et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1987-11-25
Citations: 134 A.D.2d 781
Docket Number: 
Parties: Rosedale Hutterian Brethren, Inc., Respondent, v Ha rold Cornell et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 134
Pages: 781–782

Head Matter:
Rosedale Hutterian Brethren, Inc., Respondent, v Ha rold Cornell et al., Appellants.

Opinion:
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Walsh, Jr., J.), entered September 24, 1986 in Hamilton County, which granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment.
The judgment having been entered upon defendants' default, defendants cannot appeal (see, Taubman v Taubman, 115 AD2d 190). Defendants' remedy is to apply to Supreme Court to vacate the judgment and, if unsuccessful, to appeal from the resulting order (see, Tongue v Tongue, 97 AD2d 638, affd 61 NY2d 809).
Appeal dismissed, with costs. Mahoney, P. J., Main, Mikoll, Yesawich Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.