Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark ST. PE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-03-10
Citations: 129 F. App'x 872
Docket Number: No. 04-30717
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark ST. PE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before REAVLEY, JONES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 129
Pages: 872–872

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark ST. PE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 04-30717.
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Decided March 10, 2005.
Diane Hollenshead Copes, Assistant U.S. Attorney, William P. Gibbens, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Mark St Pe’, Millington, TN, pro se.
Before REAVLEY, JONES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Mark St. Pé, federal prisoner number 23104-034, is serving a 204-month sentence following his guilty plea to charges of conspiracy to possess cocaine with the intent to distribute and using and carrying a firearm in relation to a drug-trafficking crime. St. Pé seeks a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the district court's order transferring his successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to this court.
We must examine the basis of our jurisdiction sua sponte if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir.1987). An order transferring a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to this court is a non-appealable interlocutory order. See Brinar v. Williamson, 245 F.3d 515, 516-18 (5th Cir.2001). This court is without jurisdiction to consider St. Pé's appeal. Accordingly, St. Pé's motion for a COA is DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4. '