Case Name: Otto HÜBNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUNBEAM CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1971-11-12
Citations: 450 F.2d 878
Docket Number: No. 152, Docket 35812
Parties: Otto HÜBNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUNBEAM CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 450
Pages: 878–878

Head Matter:
Otto HÜBNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUNBEAM CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 152, Docket 35812.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued Oct. 19, 1971.
Decided Nov. 12, 1971.
Kenneth S. Goldfarb, New York City (Goldfarb & Chalson, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellant.
Walther E. Wyss, Chicago, Ill. (Robert Layton, New York City, George R. Clark, Neil M. Rose, Philip M. Kolehmainen, Mason, Kolehmainen, Rathburn & Wyss, Chicago, Ill., Gilbert, Segall & Young, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellee.
Before MEDINA, MANSFIELD and MULLIGAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
We affirm on the lucid and well reasoned opinion of Judge Murphy, below, reported at 320 F.Supp. 298 (S.D.N.Y. 1970).