Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Oliver JOHNSON, Appellants
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2013-11-05
Citations: 412 S.W.3d 917
Docket Number: No. ED 97856
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Oliver JOHNSON, Appellants.
Judges: Before ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, C.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 412
Pages: 917–917

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Oliver JOHNSON, Appellants.
No. ED 97856.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Northern Division.
Nov. 5, 2013.
Timothy Forneris, Office of the Missouri Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Karen L. Kramer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, C.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Oliver Johnson appeals the judgment of the trial court entered upon a jury's verdict convicting him of one count of second-degree robbery. The trial court did not err in failing to dismiss the charges against Johnson for failure to comply with the time limitations for disposition of the charges set forth in Section 217.4901 RSMo (2000). In addition, the trial court did not err in admitting identification evidence at trial. We affirm.
An extended opinion wouid have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).