Case Name: Forster v. Malone
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1923-03-08
Citations: 30 Ga. App. 75
Docket Number: 14108
Parties: Forster v. Malone.
Judges: Broyles, O. J., and Bloodixorth, J., concur.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 30
Pages: 75–75

Head Matter:
14108.
Forster v. Malone.
Decided March 8, 1923.
Attachment;. from city court of Floyd county — Judge Nunnally.. October 19, 1922.
Willingham, Wright & Covington, for plaintiff in error.
Maddox, Lipscomb & Matthews, contra.

Opinion:
Luke, J.
There was evidence to authorize the verdict in this ease, and the verdict has the approval of the trial judge. The special grounds of the motion for a new trial which complain of the charge of the court are without merit. The charge of the court was full, fair, and properly adjusted to the pleadings and the evidence. Tor no reason assigned was it error to overrule the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Broyles, O. J., and Bloodixorth, J., concur.