Case Name: Ulisses M. BASTOS, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-02-13
Citations: 166 F. App'x 92
Docket Number: No. 05-1542
Parties: Ulisses M. BASTOS, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Respondent.
Judges: Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 166
Pages: 92–92

Head Matter:
Ulisses M. BASTOS, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Respondent.
No. 05-1542.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 25, 2006.
Decided: Feb. 13, 2006.
Antonio M. Zaldana, Law Office of Antonio M. Zaldana, Los Angeles, California, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Jeffrey J. Bernstein, Senior Litigation Counsel, John E. Cunningham, III, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Ulisses M. Bastos, a native and citizen of Brazil, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("Board") denying his motion to reopen and remand to the immigration judge to apply for asylum based upon changed circumstances. We have reviewed the administrative record and the Board's order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion. See INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24, 112 S.Ct. 719,c 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED