Case Name: Sarah Jane COBB, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-10-08
Citations: 567 So. 2d 554
Docket Number: No. 90-1683
Parties: Sarah Jane COBB, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SHIVERS, C.J., and JOANOS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 567
Pages: 554–555

Head Matter:
Sarah Jane COBB, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 90-1683.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Oct. 8, 1990.
David Davis, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Jim Rogers, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. Huff v. State, 566 So.2d 945 (Fla. 1st DCA, 1990); Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315. We certify the following question to the supreme court as one of great public importance:
DOES A DOUBLE JEOPARDY VIOLATION RESULT FROM THE IMPOSITION OF A PROBATIONARY SPLIT SENTENCE WHEN THE LEGISLATURE HAS NOT EXPLICITLY AUTHORIZED THAT DISPOSITION IN THE SENTENCING ALTERNATIVES FOR SECTION 921.087, FLORIDA STATUTES.
SHIVERS, C.J., and JOANOS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.