Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Thomas Givens, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1987-07-06
Citations: 132 A.D.2d 567
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Thomas Givens, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 132
Pages: 567–567

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Thomas Givens, Appellant.

Opinion:
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Aiello, J.), rendered February 2, 1983, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Cross-examination of a witness with exculpatory information as to his or her prior silence is generally permissible when done in good faith because of the "natural impulse of a person possessing exculpatory information to come forward at the earliest possible moment in order to forestall the mistaken prosecution of a friend or loved one" (People v Dawson, 50 NY2d 311, 318; People v Cook, 117 AD2d 675, 676, lv denied 67 NY2d 941). We find no error regarding the cross-examination because a proper foundation was laid. A Bench conference took place at the start of the cross-examination, and the defense counsel did not request an additional curative instruction (People v Dawson, 50 NY2d 311, supra; People v Cook, 117 AD2d 675, supra; People v Washington, 131 AD2d 795). In any event, the prosecutrix was warranted, on cross-examination, in exploring the subject of the witness' prior silence, since the defense counsel examined the witness on this subject during direct examination (People v Cook, supra).
The defendant's assertions of impropriety in the prosecutrix' summation were not preserved for appellate review, as no objections were taken (see, CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, the comments were a fair response to remarks made by defense counsel on summation and did not deprive defendant of a fair trial (see, People v Marks, 6 NY2d 67, cert denied 362 US 912; People v Blackman, 88 AD2d 620). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Lawrence and Harwood, JJ., concur.