Case Name: Nettie Stoll, Appellant, v. Charles Hessen, Defendant, and William Bundesen and Anton Nadvornik, Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1931-11
Citations: 234 A.D. 778
Docket Number: 
Parties: Nettie Stoll, Appellant, v. Charles Hessen, Defendant, and William Bundesen and Anton Nadvornik, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 234
Pages: 778–778

Head Matter:
Nettie Stoll, Appellant, v. Charles Hessen, Defendant, and William Bundesen and Anton Nadvornik, Respondents.

Opinion:
Judgments of the County Court of Suffolk county reversed upon the law and the facts and a new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide the event. This action was brought by the plaintiff to recover damages for personal injuries claimed to have resulted from the negligence of the respondents, employees of defendant Hessen. The complaint was dismissed at the close of the plaintiff's case on the ground that the respondents, as agents or servants, were not liable. The acts, alleged and proved, constituted misfeasance, for which the respondents may be held liable in damages. While the plaintiff may have treated the acts of the servants as the acts of the master, the action was not instituted upon that theory. (See Judson v. Fielding, 227 App. Div. 430; Murray v. Usher, 117 N. Y. 542.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Scudder, JJ., concur.