Case Name: In the Matter of the Complaint of the UNITED STATES of America, As Owner of the USCGC BLACKTHORN, For Exoneration From or Limitation of Liability, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. I.S. JOSEPH SHIPPING, LTD., I.S. Joseph Company, Inc., Clipper Maritime Co., Ltd., Pell Nederland, B.V. Termar Navigation Company, Turbana Banana Corp., Gulfcoast Transit Co., ABC Containerline, N.V., Wallenius Rederierna and Motorships, Inc., A/B Helsingfors Steamship Co., Ltd., and Alianza Naviera Argentina, D.A., Marthanassa Compania Naviera, S.A., Navios Corp. and Oceanside Ltd., et al., Claimants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1983-11-16
Citations: 720 F.2d 1206
Docket Number: No. 81-6078
Parties: In the Matter of the Complaint of the UNITED STATES of America, As Owner of the USCGC BLACKTHORN, For Exoneration From or Limitation of Liability, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. I.S. JOSEPH SHIPPING, LTD., I.S. Joseph Company, Inc., Clipper Maritime Co., Ltd., Pell Nederland, B.V. Termar Navigation Company, Turbana Banana Corp., Gulfcoast Transit Co., ABC Containerline, N.V., Wallenius Rederierna and Motorships, Inc., A/B Helsingfors Steamship Co., Ltd., and Alianza Naviera Argentina, D.A., Marthanassa Compania Naviera, S.A., Navios Corp. and Oceanside Ltd., et al., Claimants-Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 720
Pages: 1206–1206

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Complaint of the UNITED STATES of America, As Owner of the USCGC BLACKTHORN, For Exoneration From or Limitation of Liability, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. I.S. JOSEPH SHIPPING, LTD., I.S. Joseph Company, Inc., Clipper Maritime Co., Ltd., Pell Nederland, B.V. Termar Navigation Company, Turbana Banana Corp., Gulfcoast Transit Co., ABC Containerline, N.V., Wallenius Rederierna and Motorships, Inc., A/B Helsingfors Steamship Co., Ltd., and Alianza Naviera Argentina, D.A., Marthanassa Compania Naviera, S.A., Navios Corp. and Oceanside Ltd., et al., Claimants-Appellants.
No. 81-6078.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Nov. 16, 1983.
David V. Hutchinson, Civ. Div., Torts Branch, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellee.
Jack C. Rinard, Macfarlane, Ferguson, Allison & Kelly, Ted R. Manry, III, Tampa, Fla., Maslon, Kaplan, Edelman, Borman, Brand & McNulty, Minneapolis, Minn., Holland & Knight, Gregg D. Thomas, Tampa, Fla., for claimants-appellants.
Dewey R. Villareal, Jr., Tampa, Fla., Arthur L. Schechter, Houston, Tex., for Kingston Shipping Co., Inc. and Apex Marine Corp.
Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, HENDERSON and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
This judgment of the district court is affirmed. The accident giving rise to the claim for damages in this case is the same as that in Kingston Shipping Co. v. Roberts, 667 F.2d 34 (11th Cir.1982), but the defendant is different. That opinion controls this case. However, in In the Matter of the Complaint of Hercules Carriers, Inc. v. State of Florida, Canadian Transport Company, et al., Case No. 81-6005, decided this same day (slip op. p. 715), 720 F.2d 1201, one member of our court suggests that the panel in Kingston, supra, misinterpreted Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. Flint, 275 U.S. 303, 48 S.Ct. 134, 72 L.Ed. 290 (1927), and that our court en banc should consider the applicability of Robins to this type of case. Reference is directed to the Hercules opinion and special concurrence.
AFFIRMED.