Case Name: Norfolk & Western Ry. Co. v. Work et al.
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1912-06-11
Citations: 86 Ohio St. 360
Docket Number: No. 12591
Parties: Norfolk & Western Ry. Co. v. Work et al.
Judges: Spear, Shauck, Johnson, Donahue and O’Hara, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, New Service
Volume: 86
Pages: 360–360

Head Matter:
No. 12591.
Norfolk & Western Ry. Co. v. Work et al.
Decided June 11, 1912.
Error to Circuit Court of Ross county.
Messrs. Bannon & Bannon; Mr. H. W. Woodrow and Mr. Theodore W. Reath, for plaintiff in error. Mr. Frank P. Hinton and Mr. Wallace D. Yaple, for defendants in error.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed. Grounds stated in journal entry.
It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said circuit court be, and the same hereby is, affirmed; it appearing that the circuit court reversed the judgment of the common pleas court because the verdict of the jury was against the manifest weight of the evidence.
Spear, Shauck, Johnson, Donahue and O'Hara, JJ., concur.