Case Name: PATRICK DOUGHERTY, RESPONDENT, v. ANTHONY P. MILLER, INCORPORATED, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1937-01-22
Citations: 117 N.J.L. 454
Docket Number: 
Parties: PATRICK DOUGHERTY, RESPONDENT, v. ANTHONY P. MILLER, INCORPORATED, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 117
Pages: 454–454

Head Matter:
PATRICK DOUGHERTY, RESPONDENT, v. ANTHONY P. MILLER, INCORPORATED, APPELLANT.
Argued October 20, 1936
Decided January 22, 1937.
For the respondent, H. Albert Hyett.
For the appellant, Bolte & Miller.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.