Case Name: Robert W. HERSEY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-03-30
Citations: 130 S.W.3d 741
Docket Number: No. ED 82805
Parties: Robert W. HERSEY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before BOOKER T. SHAW, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 130
Pages: 741–742

Head Matter:
Robert W. HERSEY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 82805.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
March 30, 2004.
Scott Thompson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Andrea Mazza Follett, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before BOOKER T. SHAW, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Robert W. Hersey appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We previously affirmed his conviction for second degree assault of a law enforcement official, section 565.082, RSMo.2000. State v. Hersey, 80 S.W.3d 508 (Mo.App. E.D.2002). He now alleges his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to file a motion to dismiss.
Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).