Case Name: RATHBONE AGAINST PIERCE AND LAWRENCE
Court: Michigan Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Michigan
Decision Date: 1819-10-28
Citations: 3 Blume Sup. Ct. Trans. 78
Docket Number: 
Parties: RATHBONE AGAINST PIERCE AND LAWRENCE.
Judges: 
Reporter: Transactions of the Supreme Court of the territory of Michigan
Volume: 3
Pages: 396–397

Head Matter:
RATHBONE AGAINST PIERCE AND LAWRENCE.
1819, Octr. 28.
Lamed, attorney for Lawrence,
The motion was argued by Whitney for plaintiff, and Lamed Contra.

Opinion:
WOODWARD, Presiding J. .
"Two of the court are in favor of the motion, not because the attorney was absent, but from their being mistaken as to the attorney who appeared. Any indulgence to the plff. to amend, will be allowed on motion."
New trial granted.