Case Name: In re Will of John McKinstry. C. M. Keck, Executor, Appellee, v. Charley McKinstry et al., Appellants
Court: Iowa Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Iowa
Decision Date: 1927-10-18
Citations: 204 Iowa 487
Docket Number: 
Parties: In re Will of John McKinstry. C. M. Keck, Executor, Appellee, v. Charley McKinstry et al., Appellants.
Judges: Evans, C. J., and Stevens, De Graff, and Albert, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Iowa Reports
Volume: 204
Pages: 487–488

Head Matter:
In re Will of John McKinstry. C. M. Keck, Executor, Appellee, v. Charley McKinstry et al., Appellants.
October 18, 1927.
Bailey & Baldrige, J. C. Calhoun, and Starr & Jordan, for appellants.
William M. Keeley and Morrison & Morrison, for appellee.

Opinion:
Morling, J.
The only question argued is whether, under Section 11865, Code of 1924, the clerk has authority to prescribe less than ten days' notice of hearing of application for probate of will. The section reads as follows:
' ' The clerk shall give notice of the time fixed, by publishing a notice, signed by himself and addressed to all whom it may concern, in a daily or weekly newspaper printed in the county where the will is filed, once each week, for three consecutive weeks, the last publication of which shall be at least ten days before the time fixed for such hearing. The court or the judge in vacation, or clerk, in his discretion, may prescribe a different notice."
The clerk ordered notice of hearing by one publication in the newspaper named, at least five days before the date set. The notice was given, and order admitting the will to probate accordingly entered. It is not claimed that either the clerk, in making the order, or the court, in denying the motion to review, abused their discretion, if the statute authorized the clerk to prescribe less than the ten days' notice. It is not necessary to review the history of the statute in controversy. We are unable to see that it is at all ambiguous or uncertain, or that it requires interpretation. If no different notice is prescribed, the three publications, the last of whieh shall be ten days before the time fixed, must be given; but by the plain language of the statute as it now stands, "the court or the judge in vacation, or clerk, in his discretion, may prescribe a different notice." Ample remedy for abuse of discretion is provided by motion for review. Sections 11834, 11835, Code of 1924. Besides, one desiring to contest the will has one year after notice, and two years, in the absence of notice of probate, in which to sue to set aside the will. Section 11007, Code of 1924. — Affirmed.
Evans, C. J., and Stevens, De Graff, and Albert, JJ., concur.
Wagner, J., not participating.