Case Name: REVERE SUGAR REFINERY et al., Creditors, Appellants, v. PENNSYLVANIA TRUST COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, Receiver in Bankruptcy of Jacob Marcus and Benjamin Marcus, Individually and as Partners Trading as MARCUS BROTHERS, Bankrupts, Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1933-12-22
Citations: 67 F.2d 1008
Docket Number: No. 5085
Parties: REVERE SUGAR REFINERY et al., Creditors, Appellants, v. PENNSYLVANIA TRUST COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, Receiver in Bankruptcy of Jacob Marcus and Benjamin Marcus, Individually and as Partners Trading as MARCUS BROTHERS, Bankrupts, Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 67
Pages: 1008–1009

Head Matter:
REVERE SUGAR REFINERY et al., Creditors, Appellants, v. PENNSYLVANIA TRUST COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, Receiver in Bankruptcy of Jacob Marcus and Benjamin Marcus, Individually and as Partners Trading as MARCUS BROTHERS, Bankrupts, Appellees.
No. 5085.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Dec. 22, 1933.
Sidney J. Watts and Baker & Watts, all of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellants.
Oliver K. Eaton, Lewis M. Alpern, and Duff, Scott & Smith, all of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellees.
Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAYIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.
In this bankruptcy case the referee surcharged the trustee for alleged negligence in administering the bankrupt's estate. On certificate, Judge Schoonmaker reversed the action of the referee and filed an opinion in which he fully discussed every phase of the case and set forth at length his reasons for so holding. (D. C.) 2 F. Supp. 524. After a study of the proofs and due consideration of the arguments and briefs of counsel, we find ourselves in accord with his action. As the case rests wholly on its own facts, and no principles of law or practice are involved, we avoid needless restatement of what the judge has already once said and limit ourselves to affirming the court's order.