Case Name: In the Matter of John Reidy et al., Appellants, v. William G. Connelie, as Superintendent of the Division of the New York State Police, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1983-01-07
Citations: 91 A.D.2d 1099
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of John Reidy et al., Appellants, v William G. Connelie, as Superintendent of the Division of the New York State Police, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 91
Pages: 1099–1099

Head Matter:
In the Matter of John Reidy et al., Appellants, v William G. Connelie, as Superintendent of the Division of the New York State Police, Respondent.

Opinion:
— Motion for clarification denied, without costs. Since the matter was remitted to respondent for the conduct of proceedings (Matter of Reidy v Connelie, 82 AD2d 986), it is for respondent to determine the format of such proceedings. Petitioners may, of course, raise this issue upon judicial review of any ultimate adverse determination. Mahoney, P. J., Main, Mikoll and Yesawich, Jr., JJ., concur.