Case Name: John J. MEILY, Jr., Petitioner, v. AGRICULTURAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION, S.A., a Panamanian company, et al., Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1973-03-28
Citations: 276 So. 2d 161
Docket Number: No. 42241
Parties: John J. MEILY, Jr., Petitioner, v. AGRICULTURAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION, S.A., a Panamanian company, et al., Respondents.
Judges: CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, Mc-CAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 276
Pages: 161–163

Head Matter:
John J. MEILY, Jr., Petitioner, v. AGRICULTURAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION, S.A., a Panamanian company, et al., Respondents.
No. 42241.
Supreme Court of Florida.
March 28, 1973.
Rehearing Denied May 7, 1973.
William E. Sadowski, of Helliwell, Mel-rose & DeWolf, Miami, for petitioner.
Ray H. Pearson, Alan G. Greer and Bertha Claire Lee, of Frates, Floyd, Pearson & Stewart, Miami, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition for writ of certiorari, we are requested to review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, which allegedly conflicts with a prior decision of the District Court of Appeal, First District.
Our initial examination of the petition and record suggested a possible jurisdictional conflict. We issued the writ and have heard arguments on both jurisdiction and the merits.
After a thorough consideration of the petition, record, briefs and argument, we are now led to conclude that no jurisdictional conflict of decisions is present. Finding, therefore, that the writ was improvidently issued, it is hereby discharged.
It is so ordered.
CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, Mc-CAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
ERVIN, J., dissents with opinion.