Case Name: James T. Kearney et al. v. State of Connecticut et al.
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1977-10-19
Citations: 174 Conn. 765
Docket Number: 
Parties: James T. Kearney et al. v. State of Connecticut et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 174
Pages: 765–765

Head Matter:
James T. Kearney et al. v. State of Connecticut et al.
Martin B. Burke, for the appellees (plaintiffs).
Frank B. Cochran, for the appellants (intervening defendant Robert Santaeroce et al.).
Frank Cochran, in support of the motion.
Argued October 19
decided October 19, 1977
Submitted October 18
decided October 19, 1977

Opinion:
The plaintiffs' motion to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in New London County is denied.
The motion by the intervening defendants Robert and Nancy Santaeroce for permission to waive the printing requirements of their supplemental brief without compliance with § 723 of the Practice Book in the appeal from the Superior Court in New London County is denied.