Case Name: COVINGTON AND CINCINNATI ELEVATED RAILROAD AND TRANSFER AND BRIDGE COMPANY v. KENTUCKY
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1894-05-26
Citations: 154 U.S. 224
Docket Number: No. 1043
Parties: COVINGTON AND CINCINNATI ELEVATED RAILROAD AND TRANSFER AND BRIDGE COMPANY v. KENTUCKY.
Judges: Mr. Chief Justice Fuller, Mr. Justice Field, Mr. Justice Gray, and Mr. Justice White concurred in the judgment of reversal, for -the like reasons as'in the'case of Covington Bridge v. Kentucky, ante, 204, 223.
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 154
Pages: 224–224

Head Matter:
COVINGTON AND CINCINNATI ELEVATED RAILROAD AND TRANSFER AND BRIDGE COMPANY v. KENTUCKY.
ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY,
No. 1043.
Argued April 25, 1894.
Decided May 26, 1894.
The judgment in this case is reversed on the authority of Covington & Cincinnati Bridge Co. v. Kentucky, ante, 204.
The case is stated in the opinion.
Mr. William H. Jackson, (with whom was -Mr. W. H. Wadsworth on the brief,) for plaintiff in error.
Mr. William J. Hendrick, Attorney General of the State of Kentucky, and Mr. William Ooébél for defendant in error.

Opinion:
Mr. Justice- Brown
delivered the opinion of the court.
This case differs from the last only in the fact that the plaintiff in error was not incorporated until 1886, and subsequently to a general law of the State declaring that all charters and grants of or to corporations shall be subject to amendment or repeal at the will of the legislature. Conceding that these words became a part of its charter, and hence that no contract was impaired by the legislation of 1890, such legislation is still open to the objection found to exist in the former case, that it is m conflict with the interstate commerce clause of the Constitution.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals of Kentucky is, therefore,
Reversed, and the case remanded to that court for further proceedings.
Mr. Chief Justice Fuller, Mr. Justice Field, Mr. Justice Gray, and Mr. Justice White concurred in the judgment of reversal, for -the like reasons as'in the'case of Covington Bridge v. Kentucky, ante, 204, 223.