Case Name: Hulin v. The State
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1922-05-09
Citations: 28 Ga. App. 562
Docket Number: 13409
Parties: Hulin v. The State.
Judges: Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 28
Pages: 562–563

Head Matter:
13409.
Hulin v. The State.
Decided May 9, 1922.

Opinion:
Broyles, O. J.
1. After correctly instructing the jury as to the law' in reference to the defendant's statement, it was not error in that connection to charge: " remembering that it is not under oath nor subject to the penalties incident to a sworn witness." Ryals v. State, 125 Ga. 266 (54 S. E. 168), and citation; Harrison v. State, 28 Ga. App. 554 (112 S. E. 293).
2. There is no substantial merit in any of the remaining grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial.
3. The verdict was authorized by the evidence.
Judgment affirmed.
Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.
Indictment for carrying pistol; from Wilkes superior court — Judge Shurley. January 24, 1922.
F. H. Colley, Hugh E. Combs, F. W. Gilbert, for plaintiff in error.
M. L. Felts, solicitor-general, contra.