Case Name: Martin JACOBS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2012-02-22
Citations: 80 So. 3d 440
Docket Number: No. 4D10-793
Parties: Martin JACOBS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: POLEN, GROSS and CONNER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 80
Pages: 440–440

Head Matter:
Martin JACOBS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D10-793.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb. 22, 2012.
Martin Jacobs, Indiantown, pro se.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Katherine Y. Mclntire, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant argues that the postconviction court erred in denying his motion following an evidentiary hearing without making findings of fact and conclusions of law. The state concedes that remand is required. We agree and reverse and remand for the judge who presided over the evidentiary hearing to enter an order containing factual findings and legal conclusions. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(d); Dillbeck v. State, 882 So.2d 969, 973 (Fla.2004); Marshall v. State, 959 So.2d 1245 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007).
Reversed and, Remanded.
POLEN, GROSS and CONNER, JJ., concur.