Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Elenilson FLORES-RODRIGUEZ, also known as Elenilson Rodriguez Flores, also known as Francisco Aquino, also known as Francisco L. Aquino, also known as Elenilson R. Rodriguez, also known as Elenilson Flores, also known as Elenilson Flores Rodriguez, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-06-16
Citations: 604 F. App'x 383
Docket Number: No. 14-20237
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Elenilson FLORES-RODRIGUEZ, also known as Elenilson Rodriguez Flores, also known as Francisco Aquino, also known as Francisco L. Aquino, also known as Elenilson R. Rodriguez, also known as Elenilson Flores, also known as Elenilson Flores Rodriguez, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before DAVIS, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 604
Pages: 383–384

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Elenilson FLORES-RODRIGUEZ, also known as Elenilson Rodriguez Flores, also known as Francisco Aquino, also known as Francisco L. Aquino, also known as Elenilson R. Rodriguez, also known as Elenilson Flores, also known as Elenilson Flores Rodriguez, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 14-20237
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
June 16, 2015.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Laura Fletcher Leavitt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before DAVIS, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Elenilson Flores-Rodriguez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Flores-Rodriguez has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Flores-Rodriguez's response. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.