Case Name: William LINCOLN, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, d/b/a Centura College; April Green; Gerald Yagen; June W. Barksdale Hershey, a/k/a June Barksdale, Defendants-Appellees and David Riggs; Katrina Varner, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-01-23
Citations: 551 F. App'x 68
Docket Number: No. 13-2032
Parties: William LINCOLN, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, d/b/a Centura College; April Green; Gerald Yagen; June W. Barksdale Hershey, a/k/a June Barksdale, Defendants-Appellees and David Riggs; Katrina Varner, Defendants.
Judges: Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 551
Pages: 68–68

Head Matter:
William LINCOLN, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, d/b/a Centura College; April Green; Gerald Yagen; June W. Barksdale Hershey, a/k/a June Barksdale, Defendants-Appellees and David Riggs; Katrina Varner, Defendants.
No. 13-2032.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 21, 2014.
Decided: Jan. 23, 2014.
William Lincoln, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin Phillip Glass, Lucille Lattimore Nelson, Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart, PC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
William Lincoln, Jr., appeals the district court's order accepting in part the recommendation of the magistrate judge to grant Defendants' motion for summary judgment and dismiss Lincoln's employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Lincoln v. Emp't Servs., No. 2:11-cv-03234-DCN, 2013 WL 4511263 (D.S.C. Aug. 23, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.