Case Name: W. A. BELL, Administrator, Appellant, v. NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE OF SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS, Appellee
Court: Texas Courts of Civil Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1939-06-14
Citations: 129 S.W.2d 1215
Docket Number: No. 10603
Parties: W. A. BELL, Administrator, Appellant, v. NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE OF SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 129
Pages: 1215–1215

Head Matter:
W. A. BELL, Administrator, Appellant, v. NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE OF SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS, Appellee.
No. 10603.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.
June 14, 1939.
Leroy C. Mumme, of Kenedy, for appellant.
Beasley & Beasley, of Beeville, and R. L. Ball, of San Antonio, for appellee.

Opinion:
SMITH, Chief Justice.
In this case neither party has filed briefs, but appellee has filed motion that judgment be affirmed.
In the absence of briefs, this Court may, in its discretion, dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, or go into the record to determine if fundamental error lurks therein, and, if not, to affirm; but if error is apparent, to reverse. Haynes v. J. M. Radford Grocery Co., 118 Tex. 277, 14 S.W.2d 811.
We have inspected the record and perceive no error.
The motion is granted and the judgment will be affirmed.