Case Name: First American Commercial Bancorp, Inc., Respondent, v. Saatchi & Saatchi Rowland, Inc. (Formerly Saatchi & Saatchi Business Communications, Inc.), et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant. (Appeal No. 2.)
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2008-11-14
Citations: 56 A.D.2d 1139
Docket Number: 
Parties: First American Commercial Bancorp, Inc., Respondent, v Saatchi & Saatchi Rowland, Inc. (Formerly Saatchi & Saatchi Business Communications, Inc.), et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant. (Appeal No. 2.)
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 56
Pages: 1139–1140

Head Matter:
First American Commercial Bancorp, Inc., Respondent, v Saatchi & Saatchi Rowland, Inc. (Formerly Saatchi & Saatchi Business Communications, Inc.), et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant. (Appeal No. 2.)
[866 NYS2d 885]

Opinion:
— Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Kenneth R. Fisher, J.), entered January 15, 2008. The order, upon plaintiffs motion to compel disclosure, determined that two documents are not privileged.
It is hereby ordered that said appeal from the order insofar as taken by defendant CB Richard Ellis is unanimously dismissed and the order is modified on the law by denying that part of the motion seeking to compel disclosure of document 42 and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.
Same memorandum as in First Am. Commercial Bancorp, Inc. v Saatchi & Saatchi Rowland, Inc. (56 AD3d 1137 [2008]). Present—Scudder, PJ., Hurlbutt, Martoche, Smith and Lunn, JJ.