Case Name: Robert PHILLIPS, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Dorman FRAZIER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1976-05-12
Citations: 537 S.W.2d 251
Docket Number: No. 10192
Parties: Robert PHILLIPS, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Dorman FRAZIER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: HOGAN, J., not participating.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 537
Pages: 251–251

Head Matter:
Robert PHILLIPS, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Dorman FRAZIER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10192.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Springfield District.
May 12, 1976.
Rich D. Moore, Moore & Brill, West Plains, for plaintiff-respondent.
Thomas B. Rosenberg, Willow Springs, for defendant-appellant.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appellant's motion for new trial was not ruled within 90 days after it was filed and per Rule 78.06, V.A.M.R., deemed denied on October 28, 1975. Appellant's notice of appeal was filed November 12, 1975.
The judgment became final on October 28 [Rule 81.05(a), V.A.M.R.] and the notice of appeal was not filed within the ten day period as provided in Rule 81.04, V.A.M.R.
The notice of appeal not having been timely filed, we have no jurisdiction and must dismiss the appeal. Perryman v. Perryman, 507 S.W.2d 671 (Mo.App.1974). It is so ordered.
All concur.
HOGAN, J., not participating.