Case Name: STILES v. STATE OF FLORIDA
Court: Florida Circuit Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-07-17
Citations: 36 Fla. Supp. 2d 39
Docket Number: Case No. 88-92AC10 (County Court Case No. 88-19461MM10)
Parties: STILES v STATE OF FLORIDA
Judges: 
Reporter: Florida Supplement Second
Volume: 36
Pages: 39–39

Head Matter:
STILES v STATE OF FLORIDA
Case No. 88-92AC10 (County Court Case No. 88-19461MM10)
Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County
July 17, 1989
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Steven Michaelson, Public Defender, for appellant.
Carolyn McCann, Assistant State Attorney, for appellee.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
RUSSELL E. SEAY, JR., Circuit Judge.
THIS IS an appeal on the issue of whether the trial court erred by denying appellant's Motion for Discharge where appellant had not been brought to trial within fifty (50) days of the demand for speedy trial pursuant to Rule 3.191(a)(2)(4).
This court finds that the trial court erred in denying the Motion for Discharge.
In support of this finding, this court adopts the reasoning and holding found in State v Kilts, 24 Fla. Supp. 2d 119 (17th Cir. 1987), and State v Andino, 24 Fla. Supp. 2d 142 (11th Cir. 1987). It is,
ORDERED that this cause is remanded to the trial court for the entry of an appropriate order granting the Motion for Discharge.
DONE AND ORDERED in chambers, at Fort Lauderdale, Bro-ward County, Florida, this 17th day of July, 1989.