Case Name: Eric SEGARRA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1988-09-02
Citations: 530 So. 2d 492
Docket Number: No. 87-1912
Parties: Eric SEGARRA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: HALL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 530
Pages: 492–492

Head Matter:
Eric SEGARRA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 87-1912.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Sept. 2, 1988.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Brad Permar, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and David R. Gemmer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
SCHEB, Acting Chief Judge.
The defendant challenges the revocation of his probation, claiming that there was insufficient evidence to establish a violation. We find his arguments unpersuasive. The written order of revocation fails, however, to indicate the grounds of Segarra's probation violation although at the sentencing hearing the trial court made such a statement. Therefore, we affirm the revocation of the defendant's probation but remand for the trial court to enter a proper written order corresponding with its oral pronouncement. Brown v. State, 429 So.2d 821 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983).
HALL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.