Case Name: Joe VINT, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1926-11-16
Citations: 15 F.2d 1022
Docket Number: No. 2539
Parties: Joe VINT, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 15
Pages: 1022–1022

Head Matter:
Joe VINT, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
November 16, 1926.)
No. 2539.
A. M. Belcher, of Charleston, W. Va., and Frank Hill, of Marlinton, W. Va., for plaintiff in error.
Elliott Northcott, U. S. Atty., of Huntington, W. Va. (B. J Pettigrew, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Charleston, W. Va., on the brief), for the United States.
Before WADDILL, ROSE, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is a prosecution for violation of section 3 of title 2 of the National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. § 10138%aa), in that the defendant had in his possession intoxicating liquors contrary to law, and for having been previously convicted on two separate occasions of similar offenses.
We have given careful consideration to the assignments of error alleged, and find the action of the District Court free from objection, and the same is accordingly affirmed.
Affirmed.