Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Miguel MAGALLON-MOLINA, also known as Miguel Molina Magallon, also known as Miguel Sevedo, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-08-18
Citations: 613 F. App'x 345
Docket Number: No. 13-20755
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Miguel MAGALLON-MOLINA, also known as Miguel Molina Magallon, also known as Miguel Sevedo, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before JOLLY, GRAVES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 613
Pages: 345–346

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Miguel MAGALLON-MOLINA, also known as Miguel Molina Magallon, also known as Miguel Sevedo, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-20755
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 18, 2015.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Philip G. Gallagher, Michael Lance Herman, Assistant Federal Public Defenders, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Miguel Magallon-Molina, Raymondville, TX, pro se.
Before JOLLY, GRAVES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Miguel Magallon-Molina has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Magal-lon-Molina has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion shduld not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.