Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Pedro OSORIO-SILOVAR, also known as Pedro Infante, also known as Jose Diaz, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-12-08
Citations: 403 F. App'x 896
Docket Number: No. 10-50472
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Pedro OSORIO-SILOVAR, also known as Pedro Infante, also known as Jose Diaz, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 403
Pages: 896–896

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Pedro OSORIO-SILOVAR, also known as Pedro Infante, also known as Jose Diaz, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-50472
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 8, 2010.
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Judy Fulmer Madewell, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Henry Joseph Bemporad, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before KING, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Pedro Osorio-Silovar presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed. See United States v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir.2001) (rejecting Commerce Clause-based challenge to 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1)); United States v. De Leon, 170 F.3d 494, 499 (5th Cir.1999) (same); United States v. Rawls, 85 F.3d 240, 242 (5th Cir.1996) (same). The Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, its alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.