Case Name: The GENERAL TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, Appellant, v. ISOCYANATE PRODUCTS, INC.; ISOCYANATE PRODUCTS, INC. v. The GENERAL TIRE AND RUBBER COMPANY, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1968-04-16
Citations: 391 F.2d 936
Docket Number: Nos. 16737, 16738
Parties: The GENERAL TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, Appellant, v. ISOCYANATE PRODUCTS, INC. ISOCYANATE PRODUCTS, INC. v. The GENERAL TIRE AND RUBBER COMPANY, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 391
Pages: 936–937

Head Matter:
The GENERAL TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, Appellant, v. ISOCYANATE PRODUCTS, INC. ISOCYANATE PRODUCTS, INC. v. The GENERAL TIRE AND RUBBER COMPANY, Appellant.
Nos. 16737, 16738.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued March 22, 1968.
Decided April 16, 1968.
John T. Kelton, Watson, Leavenworth, Kelton & Taggart, New York City (Connolly, Bove & Lodge, Wilmington, Del., Herbert Bleeker, Thomas V. Heyman, John P. Banzhaf, III, New York City, Frank C. Rote, Akron Ohio, on the brief), for appellant in both cases (The General Tire and Rubber Co.)
C. Walter Mortenson, Mortenson & Weigel, Wilmington, Del. (Charles A. Weigel, Jr., Washington, D. C., Virgil E. Woodcock, John J. Maekiewicz, Woodcock, Phelan & Washburn, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for Isocyanate Products, Inc. and Murphy Body Works, Inc.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Before McLAUGHLIN, FORMAN and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
On a full consideration of the arguments of appellant we are satisfied that the district court acted within the allowable range of its discretion. The reasoning expressed in its opinion, reported at 270 F.Supp. 868 (D.Del.1967), fully justifies the conclusion that its discretion was wisely exercised.
The judgment will be affirmed.