Case Name: INTRASTATE OIL COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, RELATOR-APPELLANT, v. THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, BUILDING AND PLUMBING INSPECTOR, THOMAS DOWLING, AND CITY CLERK WILLIAM F. CHRISTIANSEN, RESPONDENTS
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1933-09-27
Citations: 111 N.J.L. 354
Docket Number: 
Parties: INTRASTATE OIL COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, RELATOR-APPELLANT, v. THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, BUILDING AND PLUMBING INSPECTOR, THOMAS DOWLING, AND CITY CLERK WILLIAM F. CHRISTIANSEN, RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 111
Pages: 354–354

Head Matter:
INTRASTATE OIL COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, RELATOR-APPELLANT, v. THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, BUILDING AND PLUMBING INSPECTOR, THOMAS DOWLING, AND CITY CLERK WILLIAM F. CHRISTIANSEN, RESPONDENTS.
Submitted May 26, 1933
Decided September 27, 1933.
Por. the appellant, Palmieri & Palmieri (William Her da Smith).
Por the respondents, Edward B. McGlynn.

Opinion:
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Bodine, J.
The relator attempts to have us review an order of the Supreme Court discharging a rule to show cause why mandamus should not issue to compel the issuance of a building permit and a license for the erection of a gasoline service station.
Since the constitutionality of a statute is not involved, the Supreme Court's refusal of mandamus is not reviewable in this court. Matlack v. Lloyd, 82 N. J. L. 739; Camden v. Public Service Railway Co., 84 Id. 309.
The appeal must be dismissed.
For dismissal — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenohard, Case, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.