Case Name: Dennis L. NESS and John E. Bowders, Petitioners v. YORK TOWNSHIP BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2014-07-08
Citations: 626 Pa. 252
Docket Number: No. 1037 MAL 2013
Parties: Dennis L. NESS and John E. Bowders, Petitioners v. YORK TOWNSHIP BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 626
Pages: 252–253

Head Matter:
96 A.3d 986
Dennis L. NESS and John E. Bowders, Petitioners v. YORK TOWNSHIP BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
July 8, 2014.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 8th day of July, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Did the Commonwealth Court commit an error of law when it determined that a Section 108 post-enactment notice, which was facially deficient, served as a shield against Petitioner^'] claim that the underlying Zoning and SALDO Ordinances were defective and rendered moot all procedural challenges regarding the adoption of the ordinances?
The matter will be submitted on briefs.