Case Name: John E. SEIFRIED, Appellant, v. SHELL LUMBER AND HARDWARE COMPANY and Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-06-22
Citations: 619 So. 2d 526
Docket Number: No. 93-281
Parties: John E. SEIFRIED, Appellant, v. SHELL LUMBER AND HARDWARE COMPANY and Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, Appellees.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 619
Pages: 526–526

Head Matter:
John E. SEIFRIED, Appellant, v. SHELL LUMBER AND HARDWARE COMPANY and Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, Appellees.
No. 93-281.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
June 22, 1993.
John E. Seifried, in pro. per.
John D. Maher, Tallahassee, for appel-lees.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Because the appeals referee's determination that appellant was not guilty of misconduct, see Varig Brazilian Airlines v. Florida Department of Commerce, 354 So.2d 921 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), was supported by competent evidence, it was unjustifiably reversed by the Unemployment Appeals Commission on the basis of its own conclusion that he was. See Cheung v. Executive China Doral, Inc., 617 So.2d 403 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Iglesias v. Eagle Nat'l Bank of Miami, 598 So.2d 262 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). Accordingly, the order below is reversed with directions to afford Seifried the unemployment benefits claimed.
SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN, J., concur.