Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Louis Gregory SHALES, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-07-26
Citations: 192 F. App'x 630
Docket Number: No. 05-30495
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. James Louis Gregory SHALES, Defendant — Appellant.
Judges: Before: ALARCÓN, HAWKINS and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 192
Pages: 630–630

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. James Louis Gregory SHALES, Defendant — Appellant.
No. 05-30495.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 24, 2006.
Filed July 26, 2006.
Kent Y. Liu, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Jerome Kuh, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Tacoma, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: ALARCÓN, HAWKINS and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
James Louis Gregory Shales appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 45-month sentence for bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Shales has filed a brief stating that he finds no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our examination of the brief and our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.