Case Name: Apolinar HURTADO-HERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-10-30
Citations: 203 F. App'x 850
Docket Number: No. 05-73318
Parties: Apolinar HURTADO-HERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: SKOPIL, BOOCHEVER, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 203
Pages: 850–851

Head Matter:
Apolinar HURTADO-HERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 05-73318.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 27, 2006.
Filed Oct. 30, 2006.
Apolinar Hurtado-Hernandez, San Diego, CA, pro se.
Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Diego, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Margot L. Nadel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Offiee of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: SKOPIL, BOOCHEVER, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Apolinar Hurtado-Hernandez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of an order issued by the Board of Immigration Appeals, affirming without opinion the decision of an immigration judge that Hurtado-Hernandez was removable be cause he had been convicted of crimes involving moral turpitude, and denying deferral of removal under the Convention Against Torture. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.
We have no "jurisdiction to review any final order of removal against an alien who is removable by reason of having committed a criminal offense covered in [8 U.S.C.] section 1182(a)(2)." 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C). The REAL ID Act provides an exception: "[njothing in subpara-graph . (C) . shall be construed as precluding review of constitutional claims or questions of law raised upon a petition for review filed with an appropriate court of appeals in accordance with this section." 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D). Hurtado-Her-nandez does not advance any constitutional or statutory challenges to his removal order. We therefore do not have jurisdiction over his petition.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.