Case Name: Wesley MCCONNELL, Appellant, v. PIONEER HI-BRED INTERNATIONAL, INC., Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-08-15
Citations: 260 F.3d 958
Docket Number: No. 00-1616
Parties: Wesley MCCONNELL, Appellant, v. PIONEER HI-BRED INTERNATIONAL, INC., Appellee.
Judges: Before LOKEN, JOHN R. GIBSON, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 260
Pages: 958–959

Head Matter:
Wesley MCCONNELL, Appellant, v. PIONEER HI-BRED INTERNATIONAL, INC., Appellee.
No. 00-1616.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: May 16, 2001.
Filed: Aug. 15, 2001.
Scott Gregory Hoy, argued, Sioux Falls, SD, for appellant.
Jennifer Haskin Will, argued, Minneapolis, MN (Daniel G. Wilczek, on the brief), for appellee.
Before LOKEN, JOHN R. GIBSON, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Wesley McConnell worked for Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., as a district sales manager. After Pioneer fired McConnell for poor performance, McConnell brought this action against Pioneer alleging discrimination based on his mental disability (bipolar disorder), wrongful termination, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The district court granted summary judgment in Pioneer's favor, finding McConnell failed to show he was disabled or regarded as disabled, Pioneer gave a nondiscriminatory reason for firing him, and McConnell failed to submit evidence of conduct or statements inferring that disability discrimination was the motivating factor in Pioneer's decision to dismiss him. The district court also concluded the facts did not support actions for wrongful termination or intentional infliction of emotional distress. On appeal, McConnell argues he is entitled to a jury trial. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude the district court properly viewed the facts in the light most favorable to McConnell and correctly concluded Pioneer was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Assuming McConnell established a prima facie ease of disability discrimination, we agree with the district court that McConnell failed to present evidence from which a reasonable jury could conclude Pioneer's stated reason for firing McConnell was a pretext for disability discrimination. We thus affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's memorandum opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
The Honorable Karen E. Schreier, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota.