Case Name: THAW, GOPMAN & ASSOCIATES, P.A., and Ronald Thaw, Appellants, v. JACK J. GREENBERG, M.D. & ASSOCIATES, P.A.; Jack Jay Greenberg, M.D., not individually but as Trustee for Jack Jay Greenberg, M.D. & Associates, P.A. Pension Plan, and as Personal Representative for the Estate of Esther Greenberg; and William Z. Yahr, M.D., not individually but as Trustee for Jack Jay Greenberg, M.D. & Associates, P.A. Pension Plan, and as Trustee for the Beatrice Yahr Trust, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-03-24
Citations: 595 So. 2d 305
Docket Number: No. 91-2759
Parties: THAW, GOPMAN & ASSOCIATES, P.A., and Ronald Thaw, Appellants, v. JACK J. GREENBERG, M.D. & ASSOCIATES, P.A.; Jack Jay Greenberg, M.D., not individually but as Trustee for Jack Jay Greenberg, M.D. & Associates, P.A. Pension Plan, and as Personal Representative for the Estate of Esther Greenberg; and William Z. Yahr, M.D., not individually but as Trustee for Jack Jay Greenberg, M.D. & Associates, P.A. Pension Plan, and as Trustee for the Beatrice Yahr Trust, Appellees.
Judges: Before BASKIN, LEVY and GERSTEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 595
Pages: 305–305

Head Matter:
THAW, GOPMAN & ASSOCIATES, P.A., and Ronald Thaw, Appellants, v. JACK J. GREENBERG, M.D. & ASSOCIATES, P.A.; Jack Jay Greenberg, M.D., not individually but as Trustee for Jack Jay Greenberg, M.D. & Associates, P.A. Pension Plan, and as Personal Representative for the Estate of Esther Greenberg; and William Z. Yahr, M.D., not individually but as Trustee for Jack Jay Greenberg, M.D. & Associates, P.A. Pension Plan, and as Trustee for the Beatrice Yahr Trust, Appellees.
No. 91-2759.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 24, 1992.
Hinshaw & Culbertson and Jeffrey A. Blaker and Ronald L. Kammer, Miami, for appellants.
Weintraub & Rosen and Lee Weintraub, Richey, Munroe, Fine, Goodman & Armstrong, and William Richey, Miami, for ap-pellees.
Before BASKIN, LEVY and GERSTEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the order denying the motion to vacate default filed by defendants Thaw, Gopman & Assoc., P.A., and Ronald Thaw. Under the circumstances of this case, the submission of motions to modify a stay and to dismiss the complaint instead of an answer as provided in the trial court's order does not merit entry of a default. Joseph v. Marese, 534 So.2d 920 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Techno Indus. Corp. v. Cooper Indus., Inc., 410 So.2d 584 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).
Reversed and remanded.