Case Name: Christopher EUBANKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Federal Bureau of Prisons; United States Probation Office, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-12-22
Citations: 405 F. App'x 796
Docket Number: No. 10-1412
Parties: Christopher EUBANKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Federal Bureau of Prisons; United States Probation Office, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 405
Pages: 796–797

Head Matter:
Christopher EUBANKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Federal Bureau of Prisons; United States Probation Office, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 10-1412.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 16, 2010.
Decided: Dec. 22, 2010.
Christopher Eubanks, Appellant Pro Se.
Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Eubanks appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006) his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Eubanks v. United States, No. 2:09-cv-00126-REM-DJJ, 2010 WL 1141437 (N.D.W.Va. Mar. 22, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.