Case Name: Jerry M. Schwartz, Respondent, v. Murray B. Felton et al., Defendants, and Sutton & Towne Suburban, Inc., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1991-05-20
Citations: 173 A.D.2d 600
Docket Number: 
Parties: Jerry M. Schwartz, Respondent, v Murray B. Felton et al., Defendants, and Sutton & Towne Suburban, Inc., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 173
Pages: 600–600

Head Matter:
Jerry M. Schwartz, Respondent, v Murray B. Felton et al., Defendants, and Sutton & Towne Suburban, Inc., Appellant.

Opinion:
Appeal by the defendant Sutton & Towne Suburban, Inc., from a resettled order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O'Shaughnessy, J.), entered October 26, 1989.
Ordered that the resettled order and judgment is affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice O'Shaughnessy at the Supreme Court in his decision dated August 31, 1989.
We further note that the appellant's claim that res judicata or collateral estoppel bars adjudication of the issue raised by the plaintiff is without merit. Kooper, J. P., Sullivan, Lawrence and Ritter, JJ., concur.