Case Name: In the Matter of Diane Wonsor, A Person Alleged to be A Physically Handicapped Child, Respondent. City of New York, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1974-10-08
Citations: 35 N.Y.2d 701
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Diane Wonsor, A Person Alleged to be A Physically Handicapped Child, Respondent. City of New York, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 35
Pages: 701–702

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Diane Wonsor, A Person Alleged to be A Physically Handicapped Child, Respondent. City of New York, Appellant.
Argued September 9, 1974;
decided October 8, 1974.
Adrian P. Burke, Corporation Counsel (Leonard Koerner and Milton H. Harris of counsel), for appellant.
. Wendy Sue Louring, Charles Schinitsky and William E. Heller stein for respondent.

Opinion:
Memorandum. The order appealed from should be affirmed. At the hearing, respondent corroborated rather than contradicted petitioner's evidence. This posture accounts in part for the present state of the record, which is too sparse and undeveloped to properly present the substantive issue tendered in this unduly delayed appeal.
Chief Judge Bbeitel and Judges Gabbielli, Jones, Wachtleb, Rabin, Stevens and Witmeb concur.
Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.
Designated pursuant to section 2 of article VI of the State Constitution.