Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. James A. SMITH, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2010-08-31
Citations: 318 S.W.3d 787
Docket Number: No. ED 93438
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. James A. SMITH, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 318
Pages: 787–788

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. James A. SMITH, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 93438.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Aug. 31, 2010.
Brocea L. Smith, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jamie P. Rasmussen, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
James A. Smith appeals from the trial court's judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of possession of a controlled substance. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court committed no plain error. Rule 30.20; State v. Washington, 260 S.W.3d 875, 879 (Mo.App. E.D.2008). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2008, unless otherwise indicated.