Case Name: Arnold v. Russell Car & Snow Plow Company, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1905-05-24
Citations: 212 Pa. 303
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 119
Parties: Arnold v. Russell Car & Snow Plow Company, Appellant.
Judges: Before Mitchell, C. J., Dean, Brown, Mestrezat and Potter, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 212
Pages: 303–304

Head Matter:
Arnold v. Russell Car & Snow Plow Company, Appellant.
Appeals—Interlocutory decree—Equity—Assignment of error.
A decree of the court of common pleas overruling a demurrer to a bill in equity and directing the defendant to answer, is an interlocutory decree from which no appeal lies.
Assignments of error to orders appointing a receiver and granting an injunction, and continuing the injunction and receiver, without quoting the orders, are incomplete and will not be considered.
Argued May 2, 1905.
Appeal, No. 119, Jan. T., 1905, by defendants, from decree of C. P. Elk Co., April T., 1905, No. 1, on bill in equity in case of N. T. Arnold' et al. v. Russell Car & Snow Plow Company and J. W. Russell.
Before Mitchell, C. J., Dean, Brown, Mestrezat and Potter, JJ.
Appeal quashed.
Bill in equity for an injunction and receiver.
The court entered a decree overruling the demurrer and requiring the defendant to answer over.
Errors assigned among others were as follows :
1. The court erred in its order of December 8, 1904, appointing a receiver and granting a preliminary injunction.
2. - The court erred in its order of January 6,1905, continuing the injunction and receiver..
3. The court erred in not dismissing plaintiff’s bill.
Fred H. Ely, for appellant.
Harry Alvan Hall, with him Eugene H. Baird, for appellee.
May 24, 1905:

Opinion:
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Mestrezat,
This is an appeal from the decree of the court below in overruling a demurrer to a bill in equity and directing the defendants to answer over. The first two assignments of error are incomplete, and will not be considered: Cessna's Estate, 192 Pa. 14. The decree is interlocutory and not final,' and hence no appeal lies.
The appeal is quashed.