Case Name: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent, v. Blaine BALDWIN, Petitioner
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2008-09-25
Citations: 598 Pa. 498
Docket Number: Appeal No. 229 EAL 2008
Parties: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent, v. Blaine BALDWIN, Petitioner.
Judges: 
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 598
Pages: 498–499

Head Matter:
957 A.2d 1176
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent, v. Blaine BALDWIN, Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Sept. 25, 2008.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 25th day of September 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Should not this Court clarify the doctrine of sentencing merger, and its implications under constitutional double jeop ardy analysis, under circumstances where the exact same set of facts satisfies the elements of two different offenses?