Case Name: HOLTON vs. CIRCUIT JUDGE (Gratiot)
Court: Michigan Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Michigan
Decision Date: 1897-06-22
Citations: 1 McGrath 972
Docket Number: No. 16392½
Parties: HOLTON vs. CIRCUIT JUDGE (Gratiot),
Judges: 
Reporter: Mandamus cases decided in the Supreme court of Michigan
Volume: 1
Pages: 972–972

Head Matter:
HOLTON vs. CIRCUIT JUDGE (Gratiot),
No. 16392½.

Opinion:
To require respondent to settle the testimony in a chancery cause.
Order to show cause denied June 22, 1897.
Relator filed a bill for divorce, an order pro confesso was entered, testimony taken and decree entered dismissing the bill.
Upon presentation of the testimony the court ordered that the testimony taken in a prior case between the same parties be included. Relator contends that said order is oppressive in that it involves an expense which he is unable to pay.