Case Name: Seidy M. TIBURICIO, Appellant v. ROXBURY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER, State of MASSACHUSETTS, et al., Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-01-22
Citations: 496 F. App'x 94
Docket Number: No. 12-7076
Parties: Seidy M. TIBURICIO, Appellant v. ROXBURY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER, State of MASSACHUSETTS, et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before: SENTELLE, Chief Judge, and ROGERS and BROWN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 496
Pages: 94–94

Head Matter:
Seidy M. TIBURICIO, Appellant v. ROXBURY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER, State of MASSACHUSETTS, et al., Appellees.
No. 12-7076.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Jan. 22, 2013.
Seidy M. Tiburicio, Washington, DC, pro se.
Before: SENTELLE, Chief Judge, and ROGERS and BROWN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's order filed August 7, 2012, be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed appellant's complaint as frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) ("the court shall dismiss the case at any time" if the court determines that an action is frivolous).
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.