Case Name: Jan H.M. MILLTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERICAN RED CROSS; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-09-25
Citations: 19 F. App'x 676
Docket Number: No. 01-15829; D.C. No. CV-00-00110-ACM
Parties: Jan H.M. MILLTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERICAN RED CROSS; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before HUG, PREGERSON, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 19
Pages: 676–677

Head Matter:
Jan H.M. MILLTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERICAN RED CROSS; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 01-15829.
D.C. No. CV-00-00110-ACM.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 10, 2001 .
Decided Sept. 25, 2001.
Before HUG, PREGERSON, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Million’s request for oral argument is denied.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Jan H.M. Million appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of the American Red Cross in her diversity medical malpractice action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a grant of summary judgment. Margolis v. Ryan, 140 F.3d 850, 852 (9th Cir.1998).
We conclude that the district court properly granted summary judgment because Millton failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact regarding whether Red Cross deviated from the established standard of health care when drawing her blood. See Henry v. Gill, 983 F.2d 943, 949-50 (9th Cir.1993).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.