Case Name: Herman PARRAMORE, Petitioner, v. James V. CROSBY, Jr., Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2006-02-03
Citations: 920 So. 2d 164
Docket Number: No. 1D05-2164
Parties: Herman PARRAMORE, Petitioner, v. James V. CROSBY, Jr., Respondent.
Judges: ERVIN, DAVIS and LEWIS, JJ„ concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 920
Pages: 164–165

Head Matter:
Herman PARRAMORE, Petitioner, v. James V. CROSBY, Jr., Respondent.
No. 1D05-2164.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Feb. 3, 2006.
Herman Parramore, pro se, petitioner.
Louis A. Vargas, General Counsel, and Chris Korn, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
As the Department of Corrections concedes, the circuit court erred in denying petitioner's petition for writ of mandamus prior to expiration of the time afforded for him to reply to the Department's response. See Forbes v. Crosby, 866 So.2d 198 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). Accordingly, we grant the Department's motion for remand. The circuit court's order is quashed, and this cause is remanded with directions to the circuit court to provide an opportunity to petitioner to reply.
ERVIN, DAVIS and LEWIS, JJ" concur.