Case Name: POINCIANA MOBILE HOME PARK, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. KEY WEST VILLAS MOBILE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida corporation, a/k/a Poinciana Mobile Home Park Homeowners Association, Marjorie J. Julien, Pink Conley and Geraldine B. Beckhaus, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-08-17
Citations: 622 So. 2d 185
Docket Number: No. 93-759
Parties: POINCIANA MOBILE HOME PARK, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. KEY WEST VILLAS MOBILE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida corporation, a/k/a Poinciana Mobile Home Park Homeowners Association, Marjorie J. Julien, Pink Conley and Geraldine B. Beckhaus, Appellees.
Judges: Before HUBBART, FERGUSON and GODERICH, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 622
Pages: 185–186

Head Matter:
POINCIANA MOBILE HOME PARK, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. KEY WEST VILLAS MOBILE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida corporation, a/k/a Poinciana Mobile Home Park Homeowners Association, Marjorie J. Julien, Pink Conley and Geraldine B. Beckhaus, Appellees.
No. 93-759.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Aug. 17, 1993.
Walker and Associates and Berry J. Walker, Jr., Orlando, for appellant.
Legal Services of Greater Miami Attys. Barbara G. Lanshe and Karon M. Coleman, Miami, for appellees Julien, Conley and Beckhaus.
Morgan and Hendrick and James Hen-drick, Key West, for appellee Key West Villas Mobile Homeowners Ass’n, Inc.
Before HUBBART, FERGUSON and GODERICH, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Because Poinciana Mobile Home Park, Inc., the sole appellant, has been divested of ownership of the subject rental property by an intervening foreclosure action and judicial sale, and has not otherwise made a record showing of a continuing interest in the land, the appeal is moot. See United States Parole Comm'n v. Geraghty, 445 U.S. 388, 100 S.Ct. 1202, 63 L.Ed.2d 479 (1980) (mootness test requires parties to have a personal interest in the outcome throughout the course of the litigation).
Appeal dismissed.