Case Name: Marshall BANKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-11-10
Citations: 626 So. 2d 314
Docket Number: No. 92-3027
Parties: Marshall BANKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: DELL, C.J., and STONE and FARMER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 626
Pages: 314–315

Head Matter:
Marshall BANKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 92-3027.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Nov. 10, 1993.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Robert Freidman, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, arid Dawn S. Wynn, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The written order of the trial court indicates that the defendant's probation was revoked because he violated four of its terms. The court actually dismissed three of the alleged violations and announced that, the only condition breached was the one requiring him to file monthly reports. We therefore reverse the order and instruct that on remand the trial court conform the written order to its oral pronouncement.
REVERSED.
DELL, C.J., and STONE and FARMER, JJ., concur.