Case Name: Nathan Andrew KNIATT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 2008-04-09
Citations: 255 S.W.3d 311
Docket Number: No. 10-03-00199-CR
Parties: Nathan Andrew KNIATT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
Judges: Before Chief Justice GRAY, Justice VANCE, and Justice REYNA.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 255
Pages: 311–314

Head Matter:
Nathan Andrew KNIATT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
No. 10-03-00199-CR.
Court of Appeals of Texas, Waco.
April 9, 2008.
Richard S. Gladden, Denton, for appellant.
Joe F. Grubbs, Ellis County Dist. Atty., Waxahachie, for appellee.
Before Chief Justice GRAY, Justice VANCE, and Justice REYNA.

Opinion:
OPINION ON REHEARING
PER CURIAM. .
In our December 5, 2007 abatement order on Appellant's motion for rehearing, we abated this appeal and remanded the cause to the trial court for a new hearing on Appellant's motion to recuse the Honorable Gene Knize. Kniatt v. State, 239 S.W.3d 910 (Tex.App.-Waco 2007, order).
On January 2, 2008, Senior District Judge John Nelms, the judge assigned to conduct the hearing, heard Appellant's motion and entered an order recusing Judge Knize. An order granting a motion to recuse is not reviewable. See Tex.R. Civ. P. 18a(f).
As a result of the recusal of Judge Knize, we vacate his June 19, 2003 order denying Appellant's application for writ of habeas corpus on the voluntariness of Appellant's guilty plea. Another judge must be assigned to hear the application. See Tex.R. Civ. P. 18a(f). We remand this cause for further proceedings.
Chief Justice GRAY dissenting.