Case Name: B-E-C-K McLAUGHLIN & ASSOCIATES, Petitioner and Appellee, v. The RENEGOTIATION BOARD, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1971-07-07
Citations: 443 F.2d 1180
Docket Number: No. 24661
Parties: B-E-C-K McLAUGHLIN & ASSOCIATES, Petitioner and Appellee, v. The RENEGOTIATION BOARD, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 443
Pages: 1180–1180

Head Matter:
B-E-C-K McLAUGHLIN & ASSOCIATES, Petitioner and Appellee, v. The RENEGOTIATION BOARD, Appellant.
No. 24661.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
July 7, 1971.
James H. Prentice (argued), Special Litigation Atty., L. Patrick Gray, III, Washington, D. C., for appellant.
Simon Wampold (argued), Josef Diamond, Seattle, Wash., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges, and VON DER HEYDT, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
We are unable to find either errors of law by the Tax Court or that the findings of fact are arbitrary or capricious.
The case is affirmed on the opinion of the Tax Court, TC Memo 1969-15; see 1169,015 P-H Memo TC.