Case Name: JACK WILLIAMS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. RUSSELL HARRIOTT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1935-10-09
Citations: 115 N.J.L. 497
Docket Number: 
Parties: JACK WILLIAMS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. RUSSELL HARRIOTT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 115
Pages: 497–498

Head Matter:
JACK WILLIAMS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. RUSSELL HARRIOTT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Submitted May 31, 1935
Decided October 9, 1935.
For the appellant, Messrs. Collins & Corbin.
For the respondent, Nathan BRabinowitz.

Opinion:
Pee Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bodine in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Trenchard, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.