Case Name: David Lorenzo BROOKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1994-10-24
Citations: 644 So. 2d 149
Docket Number: No. 94-1127
Parties: David Lorenzo BROOKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ZEHMER, C.J., and BOOTH and DAVIS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 644
Pages: 149–150

Head Matter:
David Lorenzo BROOKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 94-1127.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Oct. 24, 1994.
David Lorenzo Brooks, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Dept, of Legal Affairs, Tallahassee, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This cause is before us on appeal from the trial court's summary denial of appellant Brooks' 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. Because the trial court failed to include attachments to its order conclusively showing that Brooks is entitled to no relief under rule 3.850(d), we must reverse and remand for the trial court to either conduct an evidentiary hearing or include the appropriate attachments supporting denial. Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g); Hall v. State, 603 So.2d 650 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Wells v. State, 598 So.2d 259 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Cherry v. State, 590 So.2d 494 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
ZEHMER, C.J., and BOOTH and DAVIS, JJ., concur.