Case Name: Clarence BROOKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-06-06
Citations: 655 So. 2d 238
Docket Number: No. 94-1023
Parties: Clarence BROOKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: WEBSTER and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 655
Pages: 238–238

Head Matter:
Clarence BROOKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 94-1023.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
June 6, 1995.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Glen P. Gifford, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Richard Parker, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

Opinion:
MICKLE, J.
Appellant claims that the trial court imper-missibly ordered restitution upon resentenc-ing following remand from this court, where no restitution was imposed at the original sentencing. We agree and remand to the trial court with directions to vacate the order of restitution. See Abt v. State, 581 So.2d 1001 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied 591 So.2d 184 (Fla.1991); Jones v. State, 590 So.2d 1061 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).
WEBSTER and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.