Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Patricia FITZGERALD, Appellant; Patricia FITZGERALD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1994-02-22
Citations: 870 S.W.2d 478
Docket Number: Nos. 61674, 63808
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Patricia FITZGERALD, Appellant. Patricia FITZGERALD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GRIMM, P.J., and CARL R. GAERTNER and AHRENS, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 870
Pages: 478–478

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Patricia FITZGERALD, Appellant. Patricia FITZGERALD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 61674, 63808.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Feb. 22, 1994.
Ellen H. Flottman, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before GRIMM, P.J., and CARL R. GAERTNER and AHRENS, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant, Patricia Fitzgerald, appeals the judgment of murder in the first degree and armed criminal action and the denial of her Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm.
An Opinion reciting detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no prec-edential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only. This memorandum sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed according to Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b).