Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stefan Dewayne LONGBINE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-12-16
Citations: 115 F. App'x 221
Docket Number: No. 04-10438
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stefan Dewayne LONGBINE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 115
Pages: 221–221

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stefan Dewayne LONGBINE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 04-10438.
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Decided Dec. 16, 2004.
Renee Harris Toliver, Nancy E. Larson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Christopher Allen Curtis, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Stefan Dewayne Longbine appeals from his conviction of receipt of child pornography. The Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED. The Government's motion to dismiss the appeal is DENIED. The Government's motion for an extension of time in which to file a brief is DENIED as moot.
Longbine contends that the district court erred by applying U.S.S.G. § 2G2.2 to determine his offense level and, for the first time on appeal, that the four-level adjustment to his offense level for having material depicting sadistic and masochistic images of adults having sex with children violated Blakely v. Washington, — U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), and constituted plain error. Longbine concedes that his Blakely contention is foreclosed by United States v. Pineiro, 377 F.3d 464 (5th Cir.2004), petition for cert. filed (U.S. July 14, 2004)(No. 04-5263), but he raises the issue to preserve it for further review.
Longbine's receipt of child pornography was sufficient to trigger application of U.S.S.G. § 2G2.2. United States v. Canada, 110 F.3d 260, 264 (5th Cir.1997). Longbine's argument that his guideline adjustment violated Blakely is foreclosed by Pineiro, in which this court held that "Blakely does not extend to the federal Guidelines." Pineiro, 377 F.3d at 465-66.
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.