Case Name: Antwone HINTON, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent-Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-12-22
Citations: 983 S.W.2d 191
Docket Number: No. 74243
Parties: Antwone HINTON, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent-Respondent.
Judges: Before PAUL J. SIMON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 983
Pages: 191–192

Head Matter:
Antwone HINTON, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent-Respondent.
No. 74243.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Dec. 22, 1998.
Mark A. Grothoff, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Kenneth L. Ferguson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before PAUL J. SIMON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant Antwone Hinton appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct the Judgment or Sentence without an evidentiary hearing, relative to his convictions for the Class A felony of robbery in the first degree and the Class C felony of assault in the second degree.
The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).