Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fred Joseph WALDENFELS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1970-03-11
Citations: 422 F.2d 1323
Docket Number: No. 24539
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fred Joseph WALDENFELS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before BARNES and CARTER, Circuit Judges, and BYRNE. District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 422
Pages: 1323–1323

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fred Joseph WALDENFELS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 24539.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
March 11, 1970.
William N. Fielden, La Jolla, Cal., for appellant.
Shelby R. Gott, Asst. U. S. Atty., Harry D. Steward, U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for appellee.
Before BARNES and CARTER, Circuit Judges, and BYRNE. District Judge.
Hon. William M. Byrne, Senior Judge, United States District Court, Central District of California, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appellant, found guilty of smuggling seventeen pounds of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 176a, raises but one ground of alleged error on this appeal— namely: that the Assistant United States Attorney used prejudicial and inflammatory arguments to the jury. No objection was made to any of the twelve matters now charged to constitute error. Under the court's cautionary instructions to the jury, we hold there was no error. The judgment of conviction is affirmed.