Case Name: In re Tyrone HURT; William E. Turner, Petitioners
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-05-23
Citations: 521 F. App'x 186
Docket Number: No. 13-1056
Parties: In re Tyrone HURT; William E. Turner, Petitioners.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 521
Pages: 186–187

Head Matter:
In re Tyrone HURT; William E. Turner, Petitioners.
No. 13-1056.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 30, 2013.
Decided: May 23, 2013.
Tyrone Hurt, William E. Turner, Petitioners Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Tyrone Hurt and William Turner petition for a writ of mandamus seeking a ruling by the district court in two actions. Although unreasonable delay in the district court may be a reason to grant mandamus relief, see Johnson v. Rogers, 917 F.2d 1283, 1285 (10th Cir.1990), the district court's docket sheets reflect that final orders have been entered in each case and there are no outstanding matters requiring attention by the district court. Accordingly, while we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.