Case Name: SHU JIN HU, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-01-10
Citations: 407 F. App'x 737
Docket Number: No. 09-1594
Parties: SHU JIN HU, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before GREGORY, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 407
Pages: 737–738

Head Matter:
SHU JIN HU, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 09-1594.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 1, 2010.
Decided: Jan. 10, 2011.
David A. Bredin, Law Office of David A. Bredin, New York, New York, for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division, William C. Peachey, Assistant Director, Office of Immigration Litigation, Jem C. Sponzo, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Before GREGORY, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Petition granted and remanded by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Shu Jin Hu, a native and citizen of the People's Republic of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("Board") dismissing her appeal from the immigration judge's order finding that she was not credible and denying her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and withholding of removal under the Convention Against Torture ("CAT"). The Court grants the petition for review and remands to the Board to make specific findings with respect to the medical documentation submitted in support of Hu's claims and for reconsideration of its adverse credibility finding in light of Kourouma, v. Holder, 588 F.3d 234 (4th Cir.2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION GRANTED AND REMANDED.