Case Name: Morris Friedman v. United States; Morris Friedman v. United States; Morris Friedman v. United States; Camden Basket Co. et al. v. United States; Morris Friedman & Co. et al. v. United States
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1968-11-04
Citations: 61 Cust. Ct. 662
Docket Number: No. P68/467; protests 313448-K, etc. (Philadelphia); No. P68/468; protests 316993-K, etc. (Philadelphia); No. P68/469; protests 321762-K, etc. (Philadelphia); No. P68/470; protests 59/27136, etc. (Philadelphia); No. P68/471; protests 64/8027, etc. (Philadelphia)
Parties: Morris Friedman v. United States, Morris Friedman v. United States, Morris Friedman v. United States, Camden Basket Co. et al. v. United States, Morris Friedman & Co. et al. v. United States,
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Volume: 61
Pages: 662–662

Head Matter:
No. P68/467.
protests 313448-K, etc. (Philadelphia).
No. P68/468.
protests 316993-K, etc. (Philadelphia).
No. P68/469.
protests 321762-K, etc. (Philadelphia).
No. P68/470.
protests 59/27136, etc. (Philadelphia).
No. P68/471.
protests 64/8027, etc. (Philadelphia).
Morris Friedman v. United States, Morris Friedman v. United States, Morris Friedman v. United States, Camden Basket Co. et al. v. United States, Morris Friedman & Co. et al. v. United States,

Opinion:
Watson, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of bulrush, corn husk, or maize baskets similar in all material respects to those the subject of Carson M. Simon & Co. v. United States (55 Cust. Ct. 103, C.D. 2558) and Morris Friedman v. United States (58 Cust. Ct. 456, C.D. 3019), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.