Case Name: Steven FORSLUND, Petitioner-Appellant, v. David ROBINSON, Warden, Nottoway Correctional Center, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-08-02
Citations: 15 F. App'x 124
Docket Number: No. 01-6032
Parties: Steven FORSLUND, Petitioner-Appellant, v. David ROBINSON, Warden, Nottoway Correctional Center, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 15
Pages: 124–124

Head Matter:
Steven FORSLUND, Petitioner-Appellant, v. David ROBINSON, Warden, Nottoway Correctional Center, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 01-6032.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 26, 2001.
Decided Aug. 2, 2001.
Steven Forslund, pro se. Richard Bain Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for appellee.
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Steven Forslund seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Forslund v. Robinson, No. CA-99-1388-AM (E.D.Va. Nov. 29, 2000). We deny Forslund's motion for preparation of a transcript at government expense and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.