Case Name: Anthony Joseph TURNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. ARMENTROUT, Warden; C. Fleming, a/k/a C. Flemings, Captain; L. Fleming, Defendants-Appellees, and George Deeds, Warden, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-05-05
Citations: 61 F. App'x 915
Docket Number: No. 03-6427
Parties: Anthony Joseph TURNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. ARMENTROUT, Warden; C. Fleming, a/k/a C. Flemings, Captain; L. Fleming, Defendants-Appellees, and George Deeds, Warden, Defendant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 61
Pages: 915–916

Head Matter:
Anthony Joseph TURNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. ARMENTROUT, Warden; C. Fleming, a/k/a C. Flemings, Captain; L. Fleming, Defendants-Appellees, and George Deeds, Warden, Defendant.
No. 03-6427.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 24, 2003.
Decided May 5, 2003.
Anthony Joseph Turner, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Anthony Joseph Turner seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.
Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court's final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corr., 434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (1960)).
The district court's order was entered on the docket on April 12, 2002. The notice of appeal was filed on March 10, 2003. Because Turner failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal peri od, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. See Fed. R.App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988).