Case Name: Robert KINGSLAND and B.K. Ranch, L.C., Appellants, v. MATEER & HARBERT, P.A., et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2009-10-09
Citations: 18 So. 3d 1252
Docket Number: No. 5D08-2544
Parties: Robert KINGSLAND and B.K. Ranch, L.C., Appellants, v. MATEER & HARBERT, P.A., et al., Appellees.
Judges: MONACO, C.J, PALMER and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 18
Pages: 1252–1253

Head Matter:
Robert KINGSLAND and B.K. Ranch, L.C., Appellants, v. MATEER & HARBERT, P.A., et al., Appellees.
No. 5D08-2544.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Oct. 9, 2009.
James D. Kisio, of James D. Kisio, P.A., Longwood, for Appellant.
W. Scott Gabrielson and John D. Hane-brink, of Mateer & Harbert, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee, Mateer & Harbert, P.A.
Charles J. Meltz and T’Anjuiming A. Marx, of Grower, Ketcham, Rutherford, Bronson, Eide & Telan, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee, Baker & Fuller, P.A.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the amended order of the trial court dismissing the third-party complaint filed by appellants, Robert Kings-land and B.K. Ranch, L.C., against the appellees, Mateer & Harbert, P.A., and Baker & Fuller, P.A. We note for the benefit of the parties and the trial court, however, that our disposition of this appeal does not serve as an adjudication on the merits of the current first-party claim by the appellants against the appellees.
AFFIRMED.
MONACO, C.J, PALMER and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.