Case Name: Heather M. ROBISON, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Ron SCHULZE, Gene Schulze, Lois Schulze, and Schulze Property Management, LLC, Defendants/Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2010-11-23
Citations: 326 S.W.3d 542
Docket Number: No. ED 94428
Parties: Heather M. ROBISON, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Ron SCHULZE, Gene Schulze, Lois Schulze, and Schulze Property Management, LLC, Defendants/Respondents.
Judges: Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 326
Pages: 542–543

Head Matter:
Heather M. ROBISON, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Ron SCHULZE, Gene Schulze, Lois Schulze, and Schulze Property Management, LLC, Defendants/Respondents.
No. ED 94428.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District.
Nov. 23, 2010.
David G. Bandre, Jefferson City, MO, for Plaintiff/Appellant.
John R. Hamill, III, Eddie Bond Collier, II, St. Charles, MO, for Defendants/Respondents.
Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Heather M. Robison appeals from the trial court's judgment denying her relief on Count I of her breach of contract petition against Ron Schulze, Schulze Property Management, LLC, and Gene and Lois Schulze. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the trial court was supported by substantial evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Heritage Roofing, LLC v. Fischer, 164 S.W.3d 128, 132 (Mo.App. E.D.2005). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).