Case Name: Herbert HAYES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INCORPORATED; J.E. Merit Construction; Ron Pulliam, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-10-22
Citations: 48 F. App'x 884
Docket Number: No. 02-1547
Parties: Herbert HAYES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INCORPORATED; J.E. Merit Construction; Ron Pulliam, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 48
Pages: 884–884

Head Matter:
Herbert HAYES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INCORPORATED; J.E. Merit Construction; Ron Pulliam, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 02-1547.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 23, 2002.
Decided Oct. 22, 2002.
Herbert Hayes, Appellant Pro Se. James Marion Powell, Lucretia Smith Guia, Haynsworth, Baldwin, Johnson & Greaves, L.L.C., Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Herbert Hayes appeals the denial of his motion for a new trial after judgment was entered against him based upon a jury verdict in his employment discrimination action under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We therefore affirm. See Hayes v. Jacobs Eng'g Group Inc., No. CA-00-63-1 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 23, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).