Case Name: ROBY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BRIDGES and BRIDGES BROTHERS, Defendants-Appellants
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1955-02-11
Citations: 74 Ohio Law Abs. 589
Docket Number: No. 5169
Parties: ROBY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BRIDGES and BRIDGES BROTHERS, Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: MILLER, PJ, HORNBECK and WISEMAN, JJ, concur.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 74
Pages: 589–590

Head Matter:
ROBY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BRIDGES and BRIDGES BROTHERS, Defendants-Appellants.
Ohio Appeals, Second District, Franklin County.
No. 5169.
Decided February 11, 1955.
Gilbert Kirby, Plain City, for plaintiff-appellee.
L. P. Henderson, Columbus, for defendants-appellants.

Opinion:
OPINION
By THE COURT.
This is a law appeal from the judgment of the Municipal Court of Columbus.
The record as it comes to us consists of a transcript of the docket and journal entries, without a bill of exceptions.
Defendant requested the court to render a finding with respect to certain facts, which was done. In the absence of a bill of exceptions, we are required to presume that the findings of fact were supported by the evidence.
The defense of the statute of frauds is an affirmative defense, and unless it is pleaded, the objection is waived. Vol. 19, O. Jur., P. 668, Section 163.
We find no assignment of error well made. Judgment affirmed.
MILLER, PJ, HORNBECK and WISEMAN, JJ, concur.