Case Name: LENA ISAAH v. STATE
Court: Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1923-07-26
Citations: 24 Okla. Crim. 174
Docket Number: No. A-4026
Parties: LENA ISAAH v. STATE.
Judges: MATSON, P. J., and BESSEY, J., concur.
Reporter: Oklahoma Criminal Reports
Volume: 24
Pages: 174–176

Head Matter:
LENA ISAAH v. STATE.
No. A-4026.
Opinion Filed July 26, 1923.
(216 Pac. 950.)
King & Crawford, for plaintiff in error.
Tbe Attorney General, and N. W. Gore, Asst. Atty. Gen., for tbe State.

Opinion:
DOYLE, J.
This appeal is from a judgment of the county court of Pontotoc county, rendered in pursuance of a verdict convicting Lena Isaab of the offense of keeping a disorderly bouse, .and fixing her punishment at confinement for 30 days in the county jail and a fine of $50.
Omitting parts purely formal, tbe information charges that Lena Isaab, did commit "the crime of keeping a disorderly bouse in the manner and form as follows: That is to say, tbe defendant did, in said county and state, at tbe above-named time and place, wilfully and unlawfully keep a disorderly house in! the north part of Ada, Pontotoc county, Okla., contrary," etc.
Defendant interposed a demurrer on the- ground that tbe information does not state facts sufficient to constitute a public offense, which demurrer was overruled and exception allowed.
While, as a general rule, it is sufficient to charge a statutory offense in the language of the statute, there are exceptions to the rule.
Bishop says:
"The criminal nature and degree of the offense must 'ap pear in allegation, ' also tbe particular facts and circumstances which render the defendant guilty of that offense. ' ' 1 Bishop's Crim. Proc. par. 625; Weston v. Territory, 1 Okla. Cr. 407, 98 Pac. 360: Sletcher v. State, 2 Okla. Cr. 300, 101 Pac. 599, 23 L. R. A. (N. S.) 581; Abrams v. State, 13 Okla. Cr. 11, 161 Pac. 331; Wilcox v. State, 13 Okla. Cr. 599, 167 Pac. 74; Cole v. State, 15 Okla. Cr. 361, 177 Pac. 129.
A house in which people abide and disturb the order and tranquility of the neighborhood is a "disorderly house," and such facts should be alleged in an information charging the keeping of a disorderly house.
It follows that the court erred in overruling the demurrer to the information. The judgment is accordingly reversed, and the cause remanded, with direction to sustain the demurrer.
MATSON, P. J., and BESSEY, J., concur.