Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David ROSALES-AGUILAR, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-11-09
Citations: 700 F. App'x 769
Docket Number: No. 14-50315
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David ROSALES-AGUILAR, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: KOZINSKI, O’SCANNLAIN and BYBEE,..Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 700
Pages: 769–769

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David ROSALES-AGUILAR, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 14-50315
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted September 1, 2015
Submission Withdrawn March 21, 2017
Resubmitted November 9, 2017 Pasadena, California
Filed November 09, 2017
Brandon James Kimura, Esquire, Special Assistant U.S. Attorney, Helen H. Hong, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the US Attorney, San Diego, CA, Colin M. McDonald, Assistant U.S. Attorney, US Department of Justice, Southern District of California, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Kara Hartzler, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant
Before: KOZINSKI, O’SCANNLAIN and BYBEE,..Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
California Health and Safety Code section 11352(a) is divisible. United States v. Martinez-Lopez, 864 F.3d 1034, 1043 (9th Cir. 2017) (en banc). The district court didn't err by enhancing Rosales's sentence. See United States v. Rosales-Aguilar, 818 F.3d 965, 973 (9th Cir. 2016).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule'36-3.