Case Name: Leroy SPANN, Appellant v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and Pennsylvania State Police, Appellees
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2017-08-16
Citations: 169 A.3d 1084
Docket Number: No. 71 MAP 2016
Parties: Leroy SPANN, Appellant v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and Pennsylvania State Police, Appellees
Judges: Chief Justice Saylor and Justice Mundy file concurring statements.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 169
Pages: 1084–1085

Head Matter:
Leroy SPANN, Appellant v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and Pennsylvania State Police, Appellees
No. 71 MAP 2016
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
DECIDED: August 16, 2017

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 16th day of August, 2017, the Commonwealth Court's ruling dated June 9, 2016 is affirmed in part and reversed in part:
(1) that portion of the ruling granting the Suggestion of Mootness filed by the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole is hereby AFFIRMED; and
(2) that portion of the ruling granting the Preliminary Objections filed by the Pennsylvania State Police and denying the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Appellant Leroy Spann is hereby REVERSED. See Commonwealth v. Muniz, — Pa. —, 164 A.3d 1189 (2017).
The case is hereby remanded to the Commonwealth Court for the entry of an appropriate order granting mandamus relief.
Chief Justice Saylor and Justice Mundy file concurring statements.