Case Name: Raul FIGUEROA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-05-18
Citations: 97 F. App'x 177
Docket Number: No. 03-55523
Parties: Raul FIGUEROA, Petitioner—Appellant, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent—Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 97
Pages: 177–178

Head Matter:
Raul FIGUEROA, Petitioner—Appellant, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent—Appellee.
No. 03-55523.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 14, 2004.
Decided May 18, 2004.
Karla Kraus, San Diego, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.
Samuel W. Betty, Esq., US Attorney CV, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.
Before: BROWNING, RYMER, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Raul Figueroa, a native and citizen of Mexico, appeals the district court's denial of his habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, review de novo, see Tripoli v. Henman, 843 F.2d 1160, 1162 (9th Cir.1988), and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.