Case Name: Jamaal GITTENS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NC DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-02-01
Citations: 710 F. App'x 138
Docket Number: No. 17-2106
Parties: Jamaal GITTENS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NC DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 710
Pages: 138–139

Head Matter:
Jamaal GITTENS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NC DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 17-2106
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: January 30, 2018
Decided: February 1, 2018
Jamaal Gittens, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jamaal Gittens appeals the district court's order denying relief on his complaint in which he asserted claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692-1692p (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gittens v. NC Dep't of Revenue, No. 3:17-cv-00522-RJC-DSC (W.D.N.C. Sept. 8, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED