Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. David BANKS, Appellant; David BANKS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-12-19
Citations: 913 S.W.2d 100
Docket Number: Nos. 66168, 68260
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. David BANKS, Appellant. David BANKS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before AHRENS, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GRIMM, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 913
Pages: 100–101

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. David BANKS, Appellant. David BANKS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 66168, 68260.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Dec. 19, 1995.
Douglas R. Hoff, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Christine M. Blegen, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before AHRENS, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GRIMM, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals the judgment entered on his conviction by a jury of two counts of first degree burglary, § 569.170; four counts of first degree robbery, § 569.020; one count of second degree robbery, § 569.030; and two counts of armed criminal action, § 571.015. He also appeals from the motion court's denial of postconvietion relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The judgments of the trial court and motion court are affirmed pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b), respectively.