Case Name: Tutuila F. TUVALU, a.k.a. Tuvalu Tutuila Fausia, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gary SANDOR, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-03-16
Citations: 421 F. App'x 768
Docket Number: No. 08-56638
Parties: Tutuila F. TUVALU, a.k.a. Tuvalu Tutuila Fausia, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gary SANDOR, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 421
Pages: 768–769

Head Matter:
Tutuila F. TUVALU, a.k.a. Tuvalu Tutuila Fausia, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gary SANDOR, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 08-56638.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 8, 2011.
Filed March 16, 2011.
Tuvalu Tutuila Fausia, Blythe, CA, pro se.
Jennifer L. Dolan, Deputy Attorney General, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.
Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
California state prisoner Tutuila F. Tuvalu appeals pro se from the district court's judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We dismiss.
After briefing was completed in this case, this court held that a certificate of appealability is required to challenge the denial of parole. See Hayward v. Marshall, 603 F.3d 546, 554-55 (9th Cir.2010) (en banc). Because Tuvalu has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, we decline to certify his claims. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c).
All outstanding motions are denied as moot.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.