Case Name: WAREHIME ENTERPRISES, INC., Petitioner, v. John WAREHIME and Patricia Warehime, Husband and Wife, Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1999-06-09
Citations: 557 Pa. 3
Docket Number: Petition No. 1126 M.D. Allocatur Docket 1998
Parties: WAREHIME ENTERPRISES, INC., Petitioner, v. John WAREHIME and Patricia Warehime, Husband and Wife, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 557
Pages: 3–3

Head Matter:
731 A.2d 128
WAREHIME ENTERPRISES, INC., Petitioner, v. John WAREHIME and Patricia Warehime, Husband and Wife, Respondents.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
June 9, 1999.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
AND NOW, this 9th day of June, 1999, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, limited to the following two issues:
Did the Superior Court err in concluding that the Petitioner failed to state a cause of action against Respondent John Warehime for breach of fiduciary duty and/or breach of the duty of loyalty and good faith owed to the Petitioner by each of its directors?
Whether 15 Pa.C.S. § 1728 defines the outer limits of a director's fiduciary duties of care, good faith and/or loyalty in connection with an interested transaction which the director knows will result in unfairness or fraud to the corporation?