Case Name: State v. Ahart
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2002-03-20
Citations: 94 Ohio St. 3d 1509
Docket Number: 01-2019
Parties: State v. Ahart.
Judges: Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents, would allow on Proposition of Law No. I, and would hold this cause for the decision in 01-733 and 01-957, State v. Parker, Cuyahoga App. No. 76395.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 94
Pages: 1509–1509

Head Matter:
01-2019.
State v. Ahart.

Opinion:
Mahoning App. No. 93CA211. Reported at 94 Ohio St.3d 1452, 762 N.E.2d 370. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents, would allow on Proposition of Law No. I, and would hold this cause for the decision in 01-733 and 01-957, State v. Parker, Cuyahoga App. No. 76395.
Cook, J., dissents, would allow on Propositions of Law Nos. I, IV, and V, and would hold this cause for the decision in 01-733 and 01-957.
Moyer, C.J., dissents and would allow on all propositions of law.