Case Name: Robert C. McKEE; et al., Petitioners-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-12-04
Citations: 209 F. App'x 691
Docket Number: No. 04-74846
Parties: Robert C. McKEE; et al., Petitioners-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before: KLEINFELD and THOMAS, Circuit Judges, and LEIGHTON , District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 209
Pages: 691–692

Head Matter:
Robert C. McKEE; et al., Petitioners-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 04-74846.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Nov. 16, 2006.
Filed Dec. 4, 2006.
Donald L. Feurzeig, Esq., San Francisco, CA, for Petitioners-Appellants.
Charles S. Casazza, Clerk, U.S. Tax Court, Donald L. Korb, Acting Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service, Jonathan S. Cohen, Esq, Carol A. Barthel, Gretchen M. Wolfinger, Esq., Eileen J. O’Connor, Esq, U.S. Department of Justice Tax Division, Washington, DC, for Respondent-Appellee.
Before: KLEINFELD and THOMAS, Circuit Judges, and LEIGHTON , District Judge.
The Honorable Ronald B. Leighton, United States District Judge for the Western District of Washington, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
The IRS assessed a tax deficiency of $164,765 upon the McKees for tax years 1999-2000. After negotiations in which the IRS acknowledged key errors were made in calculating that figure, a settlement was reached in which the deficiency was reduced to $44,535. The McKees petitioned for reasonable litigation costs under 26 U.S.C. § 7430, but were denied by the Tax Court. Because we find that the Tax Court abused its discretion in finding that the position of the IRS was "substantially justified" we reverse the Tax Court and grant the McKees's petition.
The IRS bears the burden of proving that its position in the proceedings below was "substantially justified." In the settlement negotiations, the IRS admitted that it made errors in applying its own code and regulations. The Tax Court's finding that the IRS was excused because its own regulations were "complex" was an abuse of discretion.
The settlement resulted in a net reduction in the deficiency by 73%. Thus the McKees "substantially prevailed" with respect to the total amount in controversy. Under IRS regulations, the McKees are excused from further exhaustion of remedies.
We remand to the Tax Court for an award to the McKees of $31,078.28, their reasonable litigation costs under the Internal Revenue Code.
PETITION GRANTED. The decision of the Tax Court is REVERSED and REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
. 26 USCS § 7430(c)(4)(B).
. See 26 USCS § 7430(c)(4)(A)©.
. See 26 CFR § 301.7430-l(g) example 5.
. See 26 USCS § 7430.