Case Name: Daniel OLSON, Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA ADULT AUTHORITY, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1970-08-19
Citations: 428 F.2d 1228
Docket Number: No. 23851
Parties: Daniel OLSON, Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA ADULT AUTHORITY, Appellee.
Judges: Before HUFSTEDLER and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges, and PENCE, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 428
Pages: 1228–1228

Head Matter:
Daniel OLSON, Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA ADULT AUTHORITY, Appellee.
No. 23851.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Aug. 19, 1970.
Daniel Olson, in pro. per.
Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen., Deraid E. Granberg and Don Jacobson, Deputy Attys. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.
Before HUFSTEDLER and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges, and PENCE, District Judge.
Honorable Martin Pence, United States District Judge, Honolulu, Hawaii, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Olson, a California state prisoner, has brought this action, designated "Complaint for Declaratory Judgment and Injunction," challenging the propriety of the revocation of his parole by the California Adult Authority. In the district court, the appellant's claims were rejected as having no merit. Despite the numerous procedural infirmities of Olson's appeal we have examined the merits of the claims presented, and we have concluded that the decision of the district court must be affirmed. Allard v. Nelson 423 F.2d 1216 (9th Cir. 1970).