Case Name: William M. VOGT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-06-26
Citations: 581 So. 2d 250
Docket Number: No. 90-01778
Parties: William M. VOGT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: DANAHY, A.C.J., and FRANK and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 581
Pages: 250–251

Head Matter:
William M. VOGT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 90-01778.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
June 26, 1991.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Deborah K. Brueckheimer, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Susan D. Dunlevy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
As to the first issue, we affirm on the basis of Quarterman v. State, 527 So.2d 1380 (Fla.1988) and Smith v. State, 529 So.2d 1106 (Fla.1988). As to the second issue, we affirm special condition 27 of Mr. Vogt's probation, as it reasonably relates to the crimes for which he was convicted and is not unreasonably vague or restrictive, given the facts of this case. Conversely, we strike special condition 6 because it has no reasonable relation to Mr. Vogt's offenses or his rehabilitation.
DANAHY, A.C.J., and FRANK and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.