Case Name: PIETRO ROSELLE, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE CITY OF EAST ORANGE, COUNTY OF ESSEX, NEW JERSEY, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1962-06-11
Citations: 37 N.J. 462
Docket Number: 
Parties: PIETRO ROSELLE, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE CITY OF EAST ORANGE, COUNTY OF ESSEX, NEW JERSEY, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 37
Pages: 462–462

Head Matter:
PIETRO ROSELLE, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE CITY OF EAST ORANGE, COUNTY OF ESSEX, NEW JERSEY, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Argued June 4, 1962
Decided June 11, 1962.
Mr. Samuel A. Lamer argued the cause for the appellants {Messrs. Budd, Lamer & Kent, attorneys).
Mr. William P. Reiss argued the cause for the respondent {Mr. William L. Brack, attorney).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons-given by the trial court in an opinion reported under the name of Greggio v. Orange, 69 N. J. Super. 453 (1961).
For affirmance—Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctor, Hall and Haneman—6.
For reversal—Hone.