Case Name: A. L. Hall, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Florida, Defendant in Error
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1925-01-31
Citations: 89 Fla. 39
Docket Number: 
Parties: A. L. Hall, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Florida, Defendant in Error.
Judges: West and Terrell, J. J., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 89
Pages: 39–40

Head Matter:
A. L. Hall, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Florida, Defendant in Error.
Division B.
Opinion Filed January 31, 1925.
A Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Calhoun County; C. L. Wilson, Judge.
John D. Trammell and H. V. McClellan, for Plaintiff in Error;
Rivers Buford, Attorney General, and J. B. Gaines, Assistant, for the State.

Opinion:
Whitfield, P. J.
This writ of error was taken to a judgment of conviction of murder in the second degree.
The only assignment of error is the denial of a motion for new trial. There is no duly authenticated bill of exceptions in the transcript; and as a motion for new trial can be considered by the appellate court only when it is prop erly incorporated in a bill of exceptions, (the assignment of error is unavailing. Revell v. State, 85 Fla. 402, 96 South. Rep. 156; Fortner v. State, 87 Fla. 198, 99 South. Rep. 553.
No error appears in the record proper, therefore the judgment should be affirmed. See B. F. Lasseter & Co. v. Zapf, 57 Fla. 89, 48 South. Rep. 749; Carter v. Stockton, 60 Fla. 33, 53 South. Rep. 450; Anderson v. Winer & Whaley, 50 Fla. 177, 39 South. Rep. 31; Bardwell v. State, 49 Fla. 1, 38 South. Rep. 511; Jackson v. State, 84 Fla. 646; 94 South. Rep. 505; Granquist v. State, 86 Fla. 32, 97 South. Rep. 205; Lanier v. Shayne, 86 Fla. 385, 98 South. Rep. 71; DeSoto Holding Co. v. Boyer, 85 Fla. 517, 97 South. Rep. 205.
Affirmed.
West and Terrell, J. J., concur.
Taylor, C. J., and Browne, J-., concur in the opinion.