Case Name: William A. GRAHAM v. STATE of Arkansas
Court: Arkansas Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Arkansas
Decision Date: 1990-05-07
Citations: 302 Ark. 238
Docket Number: RC 90-19
Parties: William A. GRAHAM v. STATE of Arkansas
Judges: 
Reporter: Arkansas Reports
Volume: 302
Pages: 238–238

Head Matter:
William A. GRAHAM v. STATE of Arkansas
RC 90-19
788 S.W.2d 243
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Opinion delivered May 7, 1990
Witt Law Firm, by: Ernie Witt, for appellant.
No response.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
William A. Graham, by his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk.
The motion admits that the record was not timely filed and that it was no fault of the appellant.
However, the motion does not state good cause for granting the motion as discussed in our per curiam issued February 5,1979, 265 Ark. 964. If the attorney for Graham will concede that it was his fault that the record was not filed, or if other good cause is shown, then the motion will be granted. The present motion for rule on the clerk is denied.