Case Name: In the Matter of Anonymous, for Admission as an Attorney and Counselor-at-Law, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2015-06-09
Citations: 25 N.Y.3d 1083
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Anonymous, for Admission as an Attorney and Counselor-at-Law, Appellant.
Judges: Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Pigott, Abdus-Salaam, Stein and Fahey. Judge Rivera dissents and votes to retain jurisdiction on the ground that the two-Justice dissent is on a question of law and supports an appeal as of right pursuant to CPLR 5601 (a).
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 25
Pages: 1083–1084

Head Matter:
[34 NE3d 51, 12 NYS3d 23]
In the Matter of Anonymous, for Admission as an Attorney and Counselor-at-Law, Appellant.
Decided June 9, 2015
APPEARANCES OP COUNSEL
Tarik Davis, Brooklyn, for appellant.
Maria Matos, Committee on Character and Fitness, New York City, for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Appeal dismissed without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that the two-Justice dissent is not on a question of law (see CPLR 5601 [a]).
Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Pigott, Abdus-Salaam, Stein and Fahey. Judge Rivera dissents and votes to retain jurisdiction on the ground that the two-Justice dissent is on a question of law and supports an appeal as of right pursuant to CPLR 5601 (a).