Case Name: Golden Gate Development Co. v. Margaret Maloney Ritchie, et al.
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1938-10-18
Citations: 134 Fla. 423
Docket Number: 
Parties: Golden Gate Development Co. v. Margaret Maloney Ritchie, et al.
Judges: Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown, Buford and Chapman, J. J., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 134
Pages: 423–424

Head Matter:
Golden Gate Development Co. v. Margaret Maloney Ritchie, et al.
183 So. 845
Order Entered October 18, 1938.
Carroll Dunscombe, for Appellant;
Smith & Kanner, for Appellees.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This cause is here on motion to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that the appellant has failed to comply with Sub-s'ections (c) and (f) of Rule 20 of this Court controlling the manner of preparing briefs to be filed in this Court. An examination has been made of the brief and while the same fails to meet the requirements of the Rule and is otherwise subject to the criticism appearing in the motion, we have observed a request on the part of counsel for appellees for an oral argument, and under the circumstances of this cas'e, we have concluded that it would be expedient to withhold a ruling on the motion to dismiss until after the case is heard on oral argument, when the entire record can, be considered by this Court on its merits.
It is so ordered.
Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown, Buford and Chapman, J. J., concur.