Case Name: Earl T. SCROGGINS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Linda M. SCROGGINS, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-05-18
Citations: 180 F. App'x 449
Docket Number: No. 05-2335
Parties: Earl T. SCROGGINS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Linda M. SCROGGINS, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 180
Pages: 449–450

Head Matter:
Earl T. SCROGGINS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Linda M. SCROGGINS, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 05-2335.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 16, 2006.
Decided May 18, 2006.
Earl T. Scroggins, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Earl T. Scroggins, Jr., appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil action for failure to state claim on which relief could be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Scroggins v. Scroggins, No. CA-05-980-1 (E.D.Va. Oct. 7, 2005). We deny Scroggins' motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.