Case Name: STATE OE NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. WILLIAM TIETJEN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1920-03-01
Citations: 94 N.J.L. 278
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OE NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. WILLIAM TIETJEN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 94
Pages: 278–279

Head Matter:
STATE OE NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. WILLIAM TIETJEN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Submitted December 8, 1919
Decided March 1, 1920.
On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 93 N. J. L. 22.
For the defendant in error, Pierre P. Ganen.
For the plaintiff in error, Alexander Simpson.

Opinion:
Pee Curiam.
The judgment under review herein, should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Gummere in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance—Tire Chancellor, Parker, Bergen, Mixteen, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, Ackerson, JJ. 12.
For reversal—iSTone.