Case Name: Kenneth THUNDERBIRD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Quinn DEWALD; Roselyn White; Melanie White; Tamara Dewald, Defendants, and Irene White; Jodi Winnwalker, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-02-22
Citations: 4 F. App'x 478
Docket Number: No. 00-35145; D.C. No. CV-99-00675-ALA
Parties: Kenneth THUNDERBIRD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Quinn DEWALD; Roselyn White; Melanie White; Tamara Dewald, Defendants, and Irene White; Jodi Winnwalker, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before LEAVY, THOMAS, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 4
Pages: 478–478

Head Matter:
Kenneth THUNDERBIRD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Quinn DEWALD; Roselyn White; Melanie White; Tamara Dewald, Defendants, and Irene White; Jodi Winnwalker, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 00-35145.
D.C. No. CV-99-00675-ALA.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 12, 2001
Decided Feb. 22, 2001.
Before LEAVY, THOMAS, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Kenneth Thunderbird, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's order filed on December 13, 1999. We have not considered issues in the opening brief that were not raised in Thunderbird's original complaint. See Smith v. Marsh, 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir.1999). We deny as moot Ronald Sticka's motion to dismiss the case.
AFFIRMED.
. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.