Case Name: Michael WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-06-03
Citations: 600 So. 2d 12
Docket Number: No. 91-0730
Parties: Michael WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: HERSEY, STONE and WARNER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 600
Pages: 12–13

Head Matter:
Michael WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 91-0730.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
June 3, 1992.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Margaret Good, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Georgina Jimenez-Orosa, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the sentences imposed upon appellant for Counts I and II of the judgment, based upon the rationale underlying this court's opinion in the appeal of a code-fendant: Wright v. State, 600 So.2d 11 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). We remand for re-sentencing and note as we did in the earlier case that our opinion should not be construed as precluding the use of consecutive sentences to accomplish the purposes embodied in the plea agreement, provided only that the new sentences do not exceed sixty years and are not violative of the strictures of Blackshear v. State, 531 So.2d 956 (Fla.1988).
HERSEY, STONE and WARNER, JJ., concur.