Case Name: John Paul HEINZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2018-04-03
Citations: 544 S.W.3d 314
Docket Number: No. ED 105457
Parties: John Paul HEINZ, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 544
Pages: 314–315

Head Matter:
John Paul HEINZ, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 105457
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Filed: April 3, 2018
FOR APPELLANT: Ellen H. Flottman, Public Defender's Office, Woodrail Centre, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203.
FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Robert J. Bartholomew, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.
Before Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., Angela T. Quigless, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
John Paul Heinz appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).