Case Name: Richard A. HUCK, Appellant, v. MISSOURI BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER and Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District, Respondents.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2019-04-09
Citations: 571 S.W.3d 243
Docket Number: No. ED 107008
Parties: Richard A. HUCK, Appellant,
v.
MISSOURI BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER and Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District, Respondents.
Judges: Before Philip M. Hess, P.J. and Robert G. Dowd, Jr. and Mary K. Hoff, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 571
Pages: 243–243

Head Matter:
Richard A. HUCK, Appellant,
v.
MISSOURI BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER and Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District, Respondents.
No. ED 107008
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Filed: April 9, 2019
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: Jeremy A. Gogel, 4542 West Pine Blvd., St. Louis, MO 63108.
ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT: Russell L. Makepeace, 600 Washington Blvd., 15th Floor, St. Louis, MO 63101, Larry D. Hale, 1221 Locust Street, Suite 310, St. Louis, MO 63103.
Before Philip M. Hess, P.J. and Robert G. Dowd, Jr. and Mary K. Hoff, JJ.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Richard Huck ("Plaintiff") appeals from the summary judgment and the judgment entered on a jury verdict against him on his claims against Missouri Baptist Medical Center and Metropolitan Sewer District ("MSD"). There was no error of law in granting summary judgment to MSD on grounds that it is entitled to sovereign immunity. There was no instructional error warranting reversal of the judgment entered in favor of Missouri Baptist after a jury trial. We affirm.
An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).