Case Name: PEOPLE, Appellant, v. SCHWEITZER, Respondent (two cases); SAME v. SOMMER; SAME v. GOSS; SAME v. COHEN; SAME v. HEINEMAN; SAME v. ARRAS
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1904-06-17
Citations: 88 N.Y.S. 1112
Docket Number: 
Parties: PEOPLE, Appellant, v. SCHWEITZER, Respondent (two cases). SAME v. SOMMER. SAME v. GOSS. SAME v. COHEN. SAME v. HEINEMAN. SAME v. ARRAS.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 88
Pages: 1112–1112

Head Matter:
PEOPLE, Appellant, v. SCHWEITZER, Respondent (two cases). SAME v. SOMMER. SAME v. GOSS. SAME v. COHEN. SAME v. HEINEMAN. SAME v. ARRAS.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
June 17, 1904.)
Proceedings by the people of the state of New York to recover penalties for violations of the game law against Nathan Schweitzer, Harry Schweitzer, William Sommer, Michael Goss, Charles Cohen, Isaac Heineman, and Balthasar Arras. From judgments in each case dismissing the complaint, the people appeal. Affirmed. H. Peck, for the People. L. Marshall, for respondents.

Opinion:
HATCH, J.
I vote for the affirmance of the judgments in the above cases solely upon the ground that the decision in People v. Boot-man (decided herewith) 88 N. Y. Supp. 887, is decisive of the questions presented, and there remains no room for further debate in this court.
PATTERSON, O'BRIEN, and LAUGHLIN, JJ., concur.
McLAUGHLIN, J.
For the reasons stated in my opinion in People v. Bootman (decided herewith) 88 N. Y. Supp. 887, I dissent.