Case Name: Karolyn Kenedics, Respondent, v. Igor Ribolo, Defendant, and Irina Kravis, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2008-03-25
Citations: 49 A.D.3d 820
Docket Number: 
Parties: Karolyn Kenedics, Respondent, v Igor Ribolo, Defendant, and Irina Kravis, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 49
Pages: 820–820

Head Matter:
Karolyn Kenedics, Respondent, v Igor Ribolo, Defendant, and Irina Kravis, Appellant.
[853 NYS2d 903]

Opinion:
In support of her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against her, the defendant Irina Kravis made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see generally Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 [1986]). However, in opposition to the motion, the plaintiff raised triable issues of fact (see id.; Fontecchio v Esposito, 108 AD2d 780 [1985]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court correctly denied the defendant's motion. Prudenti, P.J., Skelos, Miller, Covello and McCarthy, JJ., concur.