Case Name: William SOWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald C. WINTER, Secretary of the Navy, in his official capacity; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-04-07
Citations: 321 F. App'x 667
Docket Number: No. 08-55140
Parties: William SOWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald C. WINTER, Secretary of the Navy, in his official capacity; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 321
Pages: 667–668

Head Matter:
William SOWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald C. WINTER, Secretary of the Navy, in his official capacity; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 08-55140.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 18, 2009.
Filed April 7, 2009.
William V. Sowell, Camarillo, CA, pro se.
Joanne Schwartz Osinoff, Assistant U.S., USLA-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
William V. Sowell appeals pro se from the district court's order affirming the magistrate judge's order extending the deadline to file a first amended complaint. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the district court's November 26, 2007 order was not a final appealable order. See WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir.1997) (en banc) (explaining that an order dismissing a complaint with leave to amend is not a final order).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.