Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Darryl HOLMES, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2008-11-18
Citations: 271 S.W.3d 59
Docket Number: No. ED 89888
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Darryl HOLMES, Appellant.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR. P.J. and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 271
Pages: 59–60

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Darryl HOLMES, Appellant.
No. ED 89888.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Nov. 18, 2008.
Terence W. Niehoff, St. Louis, for Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Dora A. Fichter, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for Respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR. P.J. and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Darryl Holmes ("Defendant") appeals from the judgment upon his conviction for domestic assault in the second degree, Section 565.073, RSMo 2000, armed criminal action, Section 571.015, RSMo 2000, and endangering the welfare of a child, Section 568.045, RSMo 2000. Defendant asserts the trial court erred in entering judgment upon his conviction for armed criminal ac tion because the State produced insufficient evidence to sustain this conviction.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).