Case Name: Charles W. EZELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DAN RIVER, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-11-27
Citations: 51 F. App'x 420
Docket Number: No. 02-1407
Parties: Charles W. EZELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DAN RIVER, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 51
Pages: 420–421

Head Matter:
Charles W. EZELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DAN RIVER, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 02-1407.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 21, 2002.
Decided Nov. 27, 2002.
Charles W. Ezell, Appellant Pro Se. James Phillip Naughton, Sara Lynne Berg, Hunton & Williams, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Charles W. Ezell appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of his former employer in this action under the Americans with Disabilities Act. We have reviewed the record and agree with the district court that Ezell failed to file a timely charge of discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and that the facts did not warrant application of the doctrine of equitable tolling or equitable estoppel. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Ezell v. Dan River, Inc., No. CA-01-53-4 (W.D.Va. Apr. 3, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.