Case Name: Morris Sklarsky, Respondent, v. The Marine Manufacturing and Supply Co., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1900-12
Citations: 33 Misc. 761
Docket Number: 
Parties: Morris Sklarsky, Respondent, v. The Marine Manufacturing and Supply Co., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 33
Pages: 761–762

Head Matter:
Morris Sklarsky, Respondent, v. The Marine Manufacturing and Supply Co., Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of Hew York, seventh district, borough of Manhattan, in favor of the plaintiff.
Harry W. Hart, for appellant.
Maurice W. Beckhardt, _for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
There was evidence enough in this case to support a finding that the sale was by sample and that the goods delivered did not conform to the sample. The goods were promptly returned by the plaintiff as soon as this was discovered and were accepted by the defendant, who returned the purchase money. The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for the breach of the contract.
There is no question of warranty, express or implied, in the case. The sole inquiry is, did the defendant deliver to the plain tiff that which it had agreed to sell, and the trial justice having resolved that question in favor of the plaintiff upon evidence which we cannot say was insufficient, the judgment must be affirmed.
Present: Beekmak, P. J., Gtegebici-i and O'Gobmah, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.