Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Curtis Daryle TINSLEY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-08-25
Citations: 613 F. App'x 248
Docket Number: No. 15-6598
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Curtis Daryle TINSLEY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 613
Pages: 248–248

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Curtis Daryle TINSLEY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-6598.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 20, 2015.
Decided: Aug. 25, 2015.
Curtis Daryle Tinsley, Appellant Pro Se. Craig Jon Jacobsen, I, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Curtis Daryle Tinsley appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Tinsley, No. 4:06-cr-00009-JLK-2 (W.D.Va. Mar. 28, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.