Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Erwin Bernard REDDING, a/k/a Easy, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-01-09
Citations: 504 F. App'x 219
Docket Number: No. 12-7250
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Erwin Bernard REDDING, a/k/a Easy, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 504
Pages: 219–219

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Erwin Bernard REDDING, a/k/a Easy, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-7250.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 19, 2012.
Decided: Jan. 9, 2013.
Erwin Bernard Redding, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Erwin Bernard Redding appeals the district court's orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence and his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Redding, No. 3:09-cr-00067-JPB-DJJ-1, 2012 WL 2370205 (N.D. W. Va. 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.