Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George WILSON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-05-22
Citations: 278 F. App'x 688
Docket Number: No. 04-2635
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George WILSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before RICHARD D. CUDAHY, Circuit Judge, MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge and DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 278
Pages: 688–688

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George WILSON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 04-2635.
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
May 22, 2008.
Jeff Cramer, Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
James M. Falvey, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before RICHARD D. CUDAHY, Circuit Judge, MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge and DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
On June 27, 2007, we issued an order affirming the conviction of George Wilson. United States v. Wilson, 240 Fed.Appx. 139 (7th Cir.2007). But we also ordered a limited remand pursuant to United States v. Paladino, 401 F.3d 471 (7th Cir.2005), so that the district court could tell us if the sentence Wilson received would have been different in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). On March 4, 2008, the district court responded to our order and concluded that it would have imposed the same sentence had it known that the sentencing guidelines were advisory, rather than mandatory. On March 20, 2008, we invited the parties, if they wished, to respond to the district court's order. The government responded with a statement of position on March 25, 2008. Wilson did not respond.
Having considered the matter, we conclude that Wilson received a reasonable sentence. Accordingly, the sentence imposed by the district court is AFFIRMED.