Case Name: PERRY PAINT & GLASS CO. and Standard Accident Insurance Co., Petitioners, v. Percy B. GAVIN, Continental Casualty Co. and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents; Percy B. GAVIN, Continental Casualty Co. and Florida Industrial Commission, Cross-Petitioners, v. PERRY PAINT & GLASS CO. and Standard Accident Insurance Co., Cross-Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1965-02-17
Citations: 173 So. 2d 134
Docket Number: No. 33519
Parties: PERRY PAINT & GLASS CO. and Standard Accident Insurance Co., Petitioners, v. Percy B. GAVIN, Continental Casualty Co. and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents. Percy B. GAVIN, Continental Casualty Co. and Florida Industrial Commission, Cross-Petitioners, v. PERRY PAINT & GLASS CO. and Standard Accident Insurance Co., Cross-Respondents.
Judges: DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 173
Pages: 134–134

Head Matter:
PERRY PAINT & GLASS CO. and Standard Accident Insurance Co., Petitioners, v. Percy B. GAVIN, Continental Casualty Co. and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents. Percy B. GAVIN, Continental Casualty Co. and Florida Industrial Commission, Cross-Petitioners, v. PERRY PAINT & GLASS CO. and Standard Accident Insurance Co., Cross-Respondents.
No. 33519.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Feb. 17, 1965.
Rehearing Denied April 12,1965.
Fowler, White, Gillen, Plumkey & Tre-nam and James E. Thompson, Tampa, foi petitioners and cross-respondents.
James T. Earle, Masterson, Lloyd & Rogers, St. Petersburg, E. O. Palermo, Shackleford, Farrior, Stallings, Glos & Evans, Tampa, for respondents and cross-petitioners.
Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for Florida Industrial Commission.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition and cross-petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date April 15, 1964.
We have concluded after argument and a consideration of the petition, record and briefs that the Full Commission erred in neglecting to direct that the petition for modification be dismissed and in failing to reverse the award of the attorney's fee which the deputy assessed against Standard Accident Insurance Company. In all other respects the order of the Full Commission conforms with the essential requirements of law.
Therefore, the petition for writ of cer-tiorari is granted, the cross-petition is denied and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.
It is so ordered.
DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.