Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ryan O'Neil LITTLE, a/k/a LA, a/k/a Youngblood, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-07-22
Citations: 533 F. App'x 339
Docket Number: No. 12-8155
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ryan O’Neil LITTLE, a/k/a LA, a/k/a Youngblood, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 533
Pages: 339–340

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ryan O’Neil LITTLE, a/k/a LA, a/k/a Youngblood, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-8155.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 18, 2013.
Decided: July 22, 2013.
Ryan O’Neil Little, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ryan O'Neil Little appeals the district court's order granting in part and denying in part Little's motion to remove the district court's previous order denying relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Little, No. 3:95-cr-00105-MOC-1 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 10, 2012). We further deny Little's motion for return of all materials and property held by USP Lee County. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.