Case Name: Edmund Wright-Ginsburg Company, Incorporated, respondent, v. Carlisle Ribbon Mills et al., appellants
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1931-04-24
Citations: 108 N.J. Eq. 206
Docket Number: 
Parties: Edmund Wright-Ginsburg Company, Incorporated, respondent, v. Carlisle Ribbon Mills et al., appellants.
Judges: For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Daly, Donges, Dear, Wells,. JJ. 10.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 108
Pages: 206–206

Head Matter:
Edmund Wright-Ginsburg Company, Incorporated, respondent, v. Carlisle Ribbon Mills et al., appellants.
[Submitted February term, 1931.
Decided April 24th, 1931.]
Messrs. Bilder Bilder, for the respondent.
Messrs. Collins é Corbin, for the appellants.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis, and reported in 105 N. J. Eq. 411.
For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Daly, Donges, Dear, Wells,. JJ. 10.
For reversal—Parker, Van Buskirk, Kays, JJ. 3..