Case Name: THE MAYOR AND ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF PATERSON, APPELLANT, v. THE BOROUGH OF GLEN RIDGE, RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1915-03-01
Citations: 87 N.J.L. 325
Docket Number: 
Parties: THE MAYOR AND ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF PATERSON, APPELLANT, v. THE BOROUGH OF GLEN RIDGE, RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 87
Pages: 325–325

Head Matter:
THE MAYOR AND ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF PATERSON, APPELLANT, v. THE BOROUGH OF GLEN RIDGE, RESPONDENT.
Argued November 19, 1914—
Decided March 1, 1915.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, in which court the following per curiam was filed:
“Per cwriam—The proceedings are affirmed, with costs, for reasons that are sufficiently stated in the opinion in Paterson v. Jersey City, 84 N. J. L. 454, and Paterson v. Kearny, 84 Id. 456, of the same term.”
For the appellant, Edward F. Merrey, William B. Gourley and John W. Griggs.
For the respondent, Gilbert Collins.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review will be affirmed for the reasons given by us in our opinions delivered at the present term in the cases of The Mayor and Aldermen of Paterson v. The Mayor and Aldermen of Jersey City, ante p. 163, and The Mayor and Aldermen of Paterson v. Town of Kearny, post p. 327.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Tbbnciiard, Parker, Bergen, Black, Bogert, Yeedenbuegh, White, Hbppenheimer, Williams, JJ. 12.
For reversal—None.