Case Name: SILVER EAGLE ENTERPRISES, Appellant, v. JENSEN TRANSPORTATION, INC., Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-06-30
Citations: 194 S.W.3d 922
Docket Number: No. ED 86720
Parties: SILVER EAGLE ENTERPRISES, Appellant, v. JENSEN TRANSPORTATION, INC., Respondent.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 194
Pages: 922–922

Head Matter:
SILVER EAGLE ENTERPRISES, Appellant, v. JENSEN TRANSPORTATION, INC., Respondent.
No. ED 86720.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
June 30, 2006.
Christopher T. Ahrens, Elizabeth R. Flaherty, Hannibal, MO, for appellant.
Timothy A. Reuschel, David Briggs, Kirksville, MO, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Silver Eagle Enterprises (hereinafter, "Silver Eagle") appeals from the trial court's judgment in favor of Jensen Transport, Inc. (hereinafter, "Jensen Transport") after the companies' tractor trailers were involved in an accident. Silver Eagle raises one issue on appeal, claiming the trial court erred in finding it one hundred percent at fault for the accident in that there was undisputed evidence Jensen Transport's driver committed negligence per se by violating Section 304.044 RSMo (2000). Silver Eagle claims this violation proximately caused the accident and resulted in damage to Silver Eagle.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file on appeal. The judgment is supported by competent and substantial evidence. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo.banc 1976); IOS Capital, LLC v. Allied Home Mortg. Capital Corp., 150 S.W.3d 148, 151 (Mo.App. E.D.2004). An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).