Case Name: Rafek Kawar, Respondent, v. Earl S. Martin et al., Defendants, and Fred H. Sommers, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1961-01-05
Citations: 12 A.D.2d 876
Docket Number: 
Parties: Rafek Kawar, Respondent, v. Earl S. Martin et al., Defendants, and Fred H. Sommers, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 12
Pages: 876–876

Head Matter:
Rafek Kawar, Respondent, v. Earl S. Martin et al., Defendants, and Fred H. Sommers, Appellant.

Opinion:
Order insofar as appealed from unanimously affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: Upon the facts here presented, it was not requisite to the maintenance of an action against the appellant Sommers to allege in the complaint due service of a notice as required by section 52 of the County Law and section 50-e of the General Municipal Law. (Appeal from part of order of Onondaga Special Term denying motion by defendant Sommers for a dismissal of plaintiff's complaint.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, McClusky, and Henry, JJ. [25 Misc 2d 3.]