Case Name: Feingold Electric, Inc., Appellant, v. Highbar Construction Corp. et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1964-07-10
Citations: 14 N.Y.2d 938
Docket Number: 
Parties: Feingold Electric, Inc., Appellant, v. Highbar Construction Corp. et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 14
Pages: 938–938

Head Matter:
Feingold Electric, Inc., Appellant, v. Highbar Construction Corp. et al., Respondents.
Submitted July 9, 1964;
decided July 10, 1964.
Emanuel M. Cohn and D. George Paston for motions.
Samuel Kirschenbaum opposed.

Opinion:
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that '.he order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. If the motion were properly before it, the Court of Appeals would deny on the merits.
Motion for stay denied.