Case Name: Jimmie SCHEMMP, Appellants, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-06-27
Citations: 23 S.W.3d 234
Docket Number: No. ED 77172
Parties: Jimmie SCHEMMP, Appellants, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 23
Pages: 234–234

Head Matter:
Jimmie SCHEMMP, Appellants, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 77172.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
June 27, 2000.
Ellen H. Flottman, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Adriane D. Crouse, Asst. Public Defender, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Jimmie Schemmp (Movant) appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without a hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).