Case Name: AMERICA ONLINE, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Prabhu MOHAPATRA, Defendant-Appellant, and All India On-Line Private Limited, Incorporated; All India On-Line Private Limited (India); International Science & Technology, Incorporated, Defendants, v. America Online (India); Anil Chawla; Richard D. Parsons; Time Warner, Incorporated, Counter Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-12-01
Citations: 208 F. App'x 196
Docket Number: No. 06-1965
Parties: AMERICA ONLINE, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Prabhu MOHAPATRA, Defendant-Appellant, and All India On-Line Private Limited, Incorporated; All India On-Line Private Limited (India); International Science & Technology, Incorporated, Defendants, v. America Online (India); Anil Chawla; Richard D. Parsons; Time Warner, Incorporated, Counter Defendants.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 208
Pages: 196–197

Head Matter:
This case was not selected for publication in the Federal Reporter UNPUBLISHED
AMERICA ONLINE, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Prabhu MOHAPATRA, Defendant-Appellant, and All India On-Line Private Limited, Incorporated; All India On-Line Private Limited (India); International Science & Technology, Incorporated, Defendants, v. America Online (India); Anil Chawla; Richard D. Parsons; Time Warner, Incorporated, Counter Defendants.
No. 06-1965.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 31, 2006.
Decided: Dec. 1, 2006.
Prabhu Mohapatra, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Abbott Grow, Arent & Fox, P.L.L.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Prabhu Mohapatra appeals the district court's order adopting the recommendation of a magistrate judge and entering default judgment against him and three corporate defendants in this action for trademark infringement and unfair competition brought by America Online, Inc. ("AOL"). After a review of the record, we find no error, and we therefore affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See America Online, Inc. v. Mohapatra, No. 1:05-cv-00535-CMH (E.D.Va. July 31, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.