Case Name: Joseph W. Roberts et al., Respondents, v. Murnie Fulmer et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1949-06-24
Citations: 275 A.D.2d 990
Docket Number: 
Parties: Joseph W. Roberts et al., Respondents, v. Murnie Fulmer et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 275
Pages: 990–990

Head Matter:
Joseph W. Roberts et al., Respondents, v. Murnie Fulmer et al., Appellants.

Opinion:
Memorandum: On the record before us, we feel that specific performance must be denied. The evidence in our opinion discloses that the oral agreement between the parties created the relationship of tenant and owner rather than that of seller and purchaser. Where specific performance of an oral agreement to convey real property is sought, the acts of the parties must be 11 unequivocal in their character and must have reference to the carrying out of the agreement. An act which admits of explanation without reference to the alleged oral contract is not, in general, admitted to constitute a part performance ". (Wooley v. Stewart, 222 N. Y. 347, 351; see, also, Burns v. McCormick, 233 N. Y. 230; Neverman v. Neverman, 254 N. Y. 496.) All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiffs in an action to compel defendants to specifically perform an oral contract for the sale of a farm and dairy to plaintiffs.) Present — Taylor, P. J., MeCurn, Vaughan, Kimball and Piper, JJ.