Case Name: Samuel C. GOLDEN, Appellant, v. ESTATE OF Hans G. TANZLER, Jr., Appellee.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2018-12-10
Citations: 257 So. 3d 652
Docket Number: No. 1D16-4960
Parties: Samuel C. GOLDEN, Appellant,
v.
ESTATE OF Hans G. TANZLER, Jr., Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 257
Pages: 652–653

Head Matter:
Samuel C. GOLDEN, Appellant,
v.
ESTATE OF Hans G. TANZLER, Jr., Appellee.
No. 1D16-4960
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
December 10, 2018
Samuel C. Golden, pro se, Appellant.
Hans G. Tanzler, III, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Hans G. Tanzler, Jr., pro se, Appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
In Burdoo v. Plympton , this court held that "[a] court reversibly errs when a prisoner requests to appear telephonically[ ] and the court fails to issue an order directed to the Department of Corrections requiring the prisoner to appear telephonically." 219 So.3d 170, 171 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) ; accord Havenner v. Hutchinson , 162 So.3d 1113, 1114 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). In this case, that is what happened.
REVERSED .
Roberts, Ray, and Winsor, JJ., concur.