Case Name: W. O. STRINGER et al., Appellants, v. The MOTORS SECURITIES CO., Inc. Appellee
Court: Texas Courts of Civil Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1929-05-10
Citations: 17 S.W.2d 144
Docket Number: No. 1813
Parties: W. O. STRINGER et al., Appellants, v. The MOTORS SECURITIES CO., Inc. Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 17
Pages: 144–144

Head Matter:
W. O. STRINGER et al., Appellants, v. The MOTORS SECURITIES CO., Inc. Appellee.
(No. 1813.)
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Beaumont.
May 10, 1929.
Rehearing Denied May 15, 1929.
G. E. Richardson, of Jasper, for appellants.
W. E. Goodrich, of Hemphill, for appellee.

Opinion:
'HIGHTOWER, C. J.
In this case judgment was rendered in the -county court of Sabine county in favor of the appellee, the Motors Securities Company, Inc., against appellants for $452.96, with interest thereon and attorney's fees as prayed by the appel-lee, who was the plaintiff below, and in due time appellants perfected their appeal to this court.
As defendants below, appellants interposed and urged against the suit a plea in abatement based upon the same grounds as was the plea in abatement interposed by the defendants in cause No. 1812, S. G. Dyson et al. v. Motors Securities Co., Inc. (Tex. Civ. App.) 17 S.W.(2d) 141, this day disposed of by written opinion not yet [officially] published. It is agreed in writing by counsel for both sides in this case that the material evidence adduced upon the trial in support of the plea in abatement in the instant case is the same as that found in the record in cause No. 1812, Dyson and others v. Motors Securities Co., Inc., and the contentions advanced by counsel for appellants in this case for reversal are the same as their contentions advanced in the Dyson Case; and these contentions are overruled for the same reasons stated by us in the Dyson Case, and the judgment has been ordered affirmed.