Case Name: In the Matter of L. A. T., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. L. A. T., Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2009-04-22
Citations: 227 Or. App. 630
Docket Number: 300704237; A134948
Parties: In the Matter of L. A. T., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. L. A. T., Appellant.
Judges: Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Sercombe, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 227
Pages: 630–631

Head Matter:
Submitted December 5, 2008,
reversed April 22, 2009
In the Matter of L. A. T., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. L. A. T., Appellant.
Lane County Circuit Court
300704237; A134948
206 P3d 1104
James A. Palmer filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Katherine H. Waldo, Senior Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Sercombe, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that she is a danger to others because of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(1)(d). The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. On de novo review of the record, we accept the state's concession and reverse.
Reversed.