Case Name: John F. Burke v. Norman Taylor et al.
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1887-11-22
Citations: 45 Ohio St. 444
Docket Number: 
Parties: John F. Burke v. Norman Taylor et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, New Service
Volume: 45
Pages: 444–444

Head Matter:
John F. Burke v. Norman Taylor et al.
Practice — Proceeding in error — IAmiiation within which must he commenced.
(Decided November 22, 1887.)
Error to the Circuit Court of Ashtabula County.
W. P. Howland and Theo. Hall, for plaintiff in error.
Puggles & Belts, for defendants in error.

Opinion:
By the Court.
Statutes authorizing proceedings in error should be strictly pursued; and such a proceeding brought to reverse a judgment for or against two or more parties should be commenced against all of them within the two years' limitation prescribed by statute in order to confer upon the reviewing court jurisdiction to reverse or modify such judgment or any part of it as to either of such parties. Smetters v. Rainey, 14 Ohio St. 287, and Jones v. Marsh, 30 Ohio St. 20, approved and followed.
Judgment affirmed.