Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Saleem Ambubakr, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2007-05-03
Citations: 40 A.D.3d 273
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Saleem Ambubakr, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 40
Pages: 273–273

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Saleem Ambubakr, Appellant.
[833 NYS2d 393]

Opinion:
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Brenda Soloff, J.), rendered January 30, 2006, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of three years, unanimously affirmed.
For the reasons stated in our decision in People v Lemos (34 AD3d 343 [2006]), we find unpreserved, and in any event unavailing, defendant's argument that the court unlawfully imposed a mandatory surcharge and fees when it did so only in writing.
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Friedman, J.E, Marlow, Sullivan, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.