Case Name: MAX GOTTFRIED, APPELLANT, v. MORRIS GOTTFRIED, RESPONDENT; AND ALBERT W. MOGE, DEFENDANTS
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1930-02-03
Citations: 106 N.J.L. 115
Docket Number: 
Parties: MAX GOTTFRIED, APPELLANT, v. MORRIS GOTTFRIED, RESPONDENT; AND ALBERT W. MOGE, DEFENDANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 106
Pages: 115–116

Head Matter:
MAX GOTTFRIED, APPELLANT, v. MORRIS GOTTFRIED, RESPONDENT; AND ALBERT W. MOGE, DEFENDANTS.
Submitted May 31, 1929
Decided February 3, 1930.
For the appellant, John TF. Palmer.
For the respondent, Samuel D. Williams.

Opinion:
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Parker, J.
This appeal will be dismissed. The record, as disclosed by the printed ease laid before us, shows that the two defendants were charged as joint tort feasors, and that at the trial a nonsuit'was ordered as to the defendant Gottfried; but there is nothing to show that any judgment was rendered as to the defendant Moge.
The rule is that writ of error (or appeal tantamount thereto) will not lie unless there has been a final disposition of the case, not only as to all the issues, but also as to all the parties. 3 C. J. 462, 464. As to issues, see Sautter v. Order of Heptasophs, 74 N. J. L. 608, and cases cited. The cases in this state on parties, are Young v. Board of Education, 84 Id. 770, and Wheat v. Public Service Gas Co., 97 Id. 584.
For dismissal — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenciiard, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, IIetfield, Diiar, JJ. 15.