Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony PRETTY ON TOP, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-04-19
Citations: 228 F. App'x 743
Docket Number: No. 06-30309
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony PRETTY ON TOP, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 228
Pages: 743–743

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony PRETTY ON TOP, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-30309.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 16, 2007.
Filed April 19, 2007.
Marcia Good Hurd, Esq., USBI-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Billings, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Mark S. Werner, Esq., Federal Defenders of Montana, Billings, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Anthony Pretty On Top appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for assault with a dangerous weapon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1153(a) and 113(a)(3).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Pretty On Top's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Pretty On Top did not file a pro se supplemental brief, and the Government did not file an answering brief.
Our independent review of the briefs and the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.