Case Name: Igor SEDRAKYAN, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-11-02
Citations: 402 F. App'x 308
Docket Number: No. 07-71436
Parties: Igor SEDRAKYAN, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 402
Pages: 308–309

Head Matter:
Igor SEDRAKYAN, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 07-71436.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 19, 2010.
Filed Nov. 2, 2010.
Areg Kazaryan, Law Offices of Areg Kazaryan, Glendale, CA, for Petitioner.
Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Colette Jabes Winston, Esquire, Monica Antoun, Esquire, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Igor Sedrakyan, a native and citizen of Russia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order denying his motion to reopen. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss the petition for review.
With respect to Sedrakyan's asylum claim, we lack jurisdiction to review the BIA's denial of his motion to reopen because he was removable for having committed an aggravated felony. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C), 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii).
With respect to Sedrakyan's withholding of removal and CAT claims, we lack jurisdiction because he failed to exhaust them before the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.