Case Name: UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee v. Blaine Stacy KILLS BACK Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-08-01
Citations: 694 F. App'x 459
Docket Number: No. 16-4352
Parties: UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee v. Blaine Stacy KILLS BACK Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 694
Pages: 459–459

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee v. Blaine Stacy KILLS BACK Defendant-Appellant
No. 16-4352
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: July 27, 2017
Filed: August 1, 2017
Benjamin Patterson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Rapid City, SD, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Blaine Stacy Kills Back, Pro Se
Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Blaine Stacy Kills Back directly appeals the above-Guidelines-range sentence the district court imposed upon revoking his supervised release. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief arguing that the sentence is unreasonable.
After careful review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Kills Back. See United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 915-18 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review); United States v. Larison, 432 F.3d 921, 922-24 (8th Cir. 2006) (revocation sentence may be unreasonable if district court fails to consider relevant § 3553(a) factor, gives significant weight to improper or irrelevant factor, or commits clear error of judgment). Accordingly, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw, and affirm the judgment.
. The Honorable Jeffrey L. Viken, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of South Dakota.