Case Name: Jack McRAE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PAROLE BOARD; District of Columbia Department of Corrections; United States Bureau of Prisons; United States Parole Commission, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-09-23
Citations: 46 F. App'x 207
Docket Number: No. 02-6823
Parties: Jack McRAE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PAROLE BOARD; District of Columbia Department of Corrections; United States Bureau of Prisons; United States Parole Commission, Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 46
Pages: 207–207

Head Matter:
Jack McRAE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PAROLE BOARD; District of Columbia Department of Corrections; United States Bureau of Prisons; United States Parole Commission, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 02-6823.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 29, 2002.
Decided Sept. 23, 2002.
Jack McRae, Appellant Pro Se. Joan Elizabeth Evans, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia; Carol Pas-kin Epstein, Michael Man Stern, Assistant Corporation, D.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Jack McRae seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and conclude on the reasoning of the district court that McRae has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See McRae v. D.C. Parole Bd., No. CA-01-283-3 (E.D.Va. May 13, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.