Case Name: W. G. Tilghman, as Surviving Partner of N. J. Tilghman and Sons, Plaintiff in Error, v. C. E. Melton, Trading and Doing Business Under the Firm Name and Style of Melton Lumber Company, Defendant in Error
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1916-06-27
Citations: 72 Fla. 36
Docket Number: 
Parties: W. G. Tilghman, as Surviving Partner of N. J. Tilghman and Sons, Plaintiff in Error, v. C. E. Melton, Trading and Doing Business Under the Firm Name and Style of Melton Lumber Company, Defendant in Error.
Judges: 
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 72
Pages: 36–37

Head Matter:
W. G. Tilghman, as Surviving Partner of N. J. Tilghman and Sons, Plaintiff in Error, v. C. E. Melton, Trading and Doing Business Under the Firm Name and Style of Melton Lumber Company, Defendant in Error.
Opinion Filed June 27, 1916.
An order dissolving a writ of attachment will not be reviewed on writ of error when the grounds of the motion to dissolve and the matters in support thereof are not incorporated in the transcript of the record.
Writ of Error to Circuit Court, Putnam County, J. T. Wills, Judge.
Judgment affirmed.
J. N. Blackwell and E. E. Haskell, for Plaintiff in Error;
Hilburn & Merry day, for Defendant in Error.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
—This was an action of assumpsit with ancillary attachment. A forthcoming bond was filed. At • the trial the record shows that "on motion of defendant, after argument of attorneys for respective parties and due consideration of same, it was ordered by the Court, that the attachment issued in this cause be and the same is hereby dissolved and dismissed." There was judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant, and the plaintiff took writ of error. The contention here is that the Court erred in dissolving the attachment, which prevented the plaintiff from taking judgment against the sureties on the forthcoming bond.
As the grounds of the motion to dissolve the attachment and the matters in support thereof and the action of the Court thereon, except as stated above, do not appear in the transcript, the action of the Court in dissolving the attachment cannot be reviewed, and the judgment is affirmed.
All concur.