Case Name: D.C., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1983-11-29
Citations: 442 So. 2d 289
Docket Number: No. 83-760
Parties: D.C., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUB-BART and BASKIN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 442
Pages: 289–290

Head Matter:
D.C., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 83-760.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 29, 1983.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Michael Mathis, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Calvin L. Fox, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUB-BART and BASKIN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The adjudication of delinquency is reversed upon a holding that the evidence presented at trial was circumstantial and failed to exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence. Redding v. State, 357 So.2d 483 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). See A.M. v. State, 440 So.2d 478 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). In addition, mere presence at the scene of a crime is insufficient to establish intent to participate. G.C. v. State, 407 So.2d 639 (Fla.3d DCA 1981). See also T.M. v. State, 415 So.2d 904 (Fla.3d DCA 1982); D.M. v. State, 394 So.2d 520 (Fla.3d DCA 1981).
Reversed.