Case Name: William E. McCURDY, Jr., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. ST. LUKE'S EPISCOPAL-PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITALS, and the Akin Family Limited Partnership, L.P., Defendants/Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2008-05-27
Citations: 265 S.W.3d 286
Docket Number: No. ED 90500
Parties: William E. McCURDY, Jr., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. ST. LUKE’S EPISCOPAL-PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITALS, and the Akin Family Limited Partnership, L.P., Defendants/Respondents.
Judges: Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 265
Pages: 286–287

Head Matter:
William E. McCURDY, Jr., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. ST. LUKE’S EPISCOPAL-PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITALS, and the Akin Family Limited Partnership, L.P., Defendants/Respondents.
No. ED 90500.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
May 27, 2008.
Application for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Sept. 15, 2008.
Application for Transfer Denied Oct. 28, 2008.
William E. McCurdy, Jr., St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Kenneth C. Brostron, James C. Hetlage, St. Louis, MO, for respondent, St. Luke’s Episcopal-Presbyterian Hospitals.
Mark F. “Thor” Hearne II, Meghan S. Largent, St. Louis, MO, for respondent, The Akin Family Limited Partnership.
Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
William E. McCurdy, Jr. appeals from the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of St. Luke's Episcopal-Presbyterian Hospitals and the Akin Family Limited Partnership, L.P. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).