Case Name: Mary E. Dickerson et al., Respondents, v. Frank P. Sheehy et al., Appellants, and Emigrants' Industrial Savings Bank et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1913-12-03
Citations: 209 N.Y. 592
Docket Number: 
Parties: Mary E. Dickerson et al., Respondents, v. Frank P. Sheehy et al., Appellants, and Emigrants’ Industrial Savings Bank et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 209
Pages: 592–597

Head Matter:
Mary E. Dickerson et al., Respondents, v. Frank P. Sheehy et al., Appellants, and Emigrants’ Industrial Savings Bank et al., Respondents.
Dickerson v. Sheehy, 156 App. Div. 101, affirmed.
(Submitted November 17, 1913;
decided December 3, 1913.)
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 4, 1913, which reversed an interlocutory judgment of Special Term sustaining a demurrer to the complaint in an action of partition.
The following question was certified: “Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action? ”
Daniel Daly for appellants.
William F. McCormack for plaintiffs, respondents.
Willard N. Baylis for defendants, respondents.

Opinion:
Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative; no opinion.
Concur: Hiscock, Chase, Collin and Miller, JJ.