Case Name: In re: James Allen IRBY, III, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-04-06
Citations: 421 F. App'x 306
Docket Number: No. 11-1128
Parties: In re: James Allen IRBY, III, Petitioner.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 421
Pages: 306–306

Head Matter:
In re: James Allen IRBY, III, Petitioner.
No. 11-1128.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 31, 2011.
Decided: April 6, 2011.
James Allen Irby, III, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James Allen Irby, III, petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2010) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court's docket reveals that the district court, on February 18, 2011, denied Irby's § 2255 motion. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Irby's case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.