Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Sergio SANCHEZ-OCHOA, a/k/a Rodolfo Trevizo, Defendant - Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-05-13
Citations: 97 F. App'x 144
Docket Number: No. 03-10394; D.C. No. CR-03-00108-FJM
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Sergio SANCHEZ-OCHOA, a/k/a Rodolfo Trevizo, Defendant - Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 97
Pages: 144–145

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Sergio SANCHEZ-OCHOA, a/k/a Rodolfo Trevizo, Defendant - Appellant.
No. 03-10394.
D.C. No. CR-03-00108-FJM.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 11, 2004.
Decided May 13, 2004.
Mary Beth Phillips, USPX — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Barbara L. Spencer, Spencer, Hubbarg & Glitsos PLC, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before O’SCANNLAIN, SILER, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
The Honorable Eugene E. Siler, Jr., Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Because Sanchez-Ochoa's waiver of his right to appeal was voluntarily, knowingly, and properly entered, it did not violate his right to due process. See, e.g., United States v. Navarro-Botello, 912 F.2d 318, 321-22 (9th Cir.1990). Similarly, because the government fully complied with its obligations under the terms of the agreement and because the sentencing court faithfully applied the sentencing guidelines, Sanchez-Ochoa received precisely what he bargained for in his plea agreement. United States v. Smith, 991 F.2d 1468, 1473 (9th Cir.1993); United States v. Lewis, 979 F.2d 1372, 1375 (9th Cir.1992). Therefore, Sanchez-Ochoa validly waived his statutory right of appeal and "may not now ignore his part of the bargain." Navarro-Botello, 912 F.2d at 322.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.