Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Femi JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-06-07
Citations: 183 F. App'x 584
Docket Number: No. 04-2406
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Femi JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before Hon. WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge, Hon. RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge, Hon. DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 183
Pages: 584–584

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Femi JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 04-2406.
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
June 7, 2006.
Gabriel A. Fuentes, Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for PlaintiffAppellee.
Douglas G. Smith, Kirkland & Ellis, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before Hon. WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge, Hon. RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge, Hon. DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
On Paladino remand, the district judge stated that he would have imposed the same guidelines sentence that he imposed originally had he known that the guidelines were merely advisory and not mandatory. Such a resentence is presumptively reasonable and in this case the presumption has not been rebutted, the judge having fully considered the defendant's arguments for a lower standard in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).
AFFIRMED.