Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Malcolm Eugene GOLSON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-05-25
Citations: 131 F. App'x 952
Docket Number: No. 05-6095
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Malcolm Eugene GOLSON, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 131
Pages: 952–953

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Malcolm Eugene GOLSON, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 05-6095.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 19, 2005.
Decided May 25, 2005.
Malcolm Eugene Golson, Appellant pro se. Laura P. Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Malcolm Eugene Golson appeals the district court's order and opinion denying his motion to compel the Government to file a motion for a reduction in his sentence due to substantial assistance. We have reviewed the record and the district court's order and affirm for the reasons of the district court. See United States v. Golson, Nos. CR-01-47, CA-02-774 (E.D.Va. Jan. 3, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED