Case Name: Wayne JONES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2014-08-26
Citations: 439 S.W.3d 297
Docket Number: No. ED 100697
Parties: Wayne JONES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and PHILIP M. HESS, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 439
Pages: 297–298

Head Matter:
Wayne JONES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 100697.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Aug. 26, 2014.
Andrew E. Zleit, St. Louis, MO, for Movant/Appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent/Respondent.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and PHILIP M. HESS, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Wayne Jones (Appellant) appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 29.15 without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k); Burston v. State, 343 S.W.3d 691, 693 (Mo.App.E.D.2011). Appellant was not entitled to an evidentiary hearing because he did not plead facts, unrefuted by the record, warranting relief. Webb v. State, 334 S.W.3d 126, 128 (Mo. banc 2011). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2012, unless otherwise indicated.