Case Name: Commonwealth v. Jaynes, Appellant
Court: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1972-06-15
Citations: 221 Pa. Super. 302
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 534
Parties: Commonwealth v. Jaynes, Appellant.
Judges: Before Wright, P. J., Watkins, Jacobs, Hoffman, Spaulding, Cercone, and Packel, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania Superior Court Reports
Volume: 221
Pages: 302–303

Head Matter:
Commonwealth v. Jaynes, Appellant.
Argued April 11, 1972.
Before Wright, P. J., Watkins, Jacobs, Hoffman, Spaulding, Cercone, and Packel, JJ.
Zeno Fritz, for appellant.
Henry A. Martin, Assistant District Attorney, with him John N. Scales, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.
June 15, 1972:

Opinion:
Opinion
Per Curiam,
A new support hearing, stenographically reported, is necessary because the court below in violation of the Act of May 1, 1907, P. L. 135, §2, as amended, 17 P.S. §1802, had refused the request of counsel for the defendant-appellant that the testimony of the hearing be transcribed. Commonwealth ex rel. Hollinger v. Shaeffer, 196 Pa. Superior Ct. 301, 175 A. 2d 114 (1961). Remanded for a new hearing.