Case Name: Daniel Farnum GOLDENHAR v. Richard P. WHITE et al.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1942-05-11
Citations: 127 F.2d 861
Docket Number: No. 10106
Parties: Daniel Farnum GOLDENHAR v. Richard P. WHITE et al.
Judges: Before GARRECHT, HANEY, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 127
Pages: 861–862

Head Matter:
Daniel Farnum GOLDENHAR v. Richard P. WHITE et al.
No. 10106.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 11, 1942.
Albeck & Albeck, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
Rex J. Hanson and Jesse R. S. Budge, both of Salt Lake City, Utah, for appellees.
Before GARRECHT, HANEY, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This cause coming before the Court on default of the appellant in failing to make deposit covering estimated expense to'f printing transcript of record as required by Rule 19 of the Rules of this Court, and it appearing from the files that appellant's counsel have been notified that such default would be called to the Court's attention on this date, and no response to such notice having been received, ordered appeal here in dismissed for failure of appellant to make deposit as required by Rule 19 of the Rules of this Court, that a judgment be filed and entered accordingly, and that mandate of this court in this cause issue forthwith.