Case Name: David L. WHITEHEAD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VIACOM, INCORPORATED; Does 1-50, Unnamed, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-05-21
Citations: 63 F. App'x 175
Docket Number: No. 03-1148
Parties: David L. WHITEHEAD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VIACOM, INCORPORATED; Does 1-50, Unnamed, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 63
Pages: 175–176

Head Matter:
David L. WHITEHEAD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VIACOM, INCORPORATED; Does 1-50, Unnamed, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 03-1148.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 30, 2003.
Decided May 21, 2003.
David L. Whitehead, Appellant Pro Se. Paul R. Taskier, Dickstein, Shapiro, Morin & Oshinsky, L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
PER CURIAM.
David L. Whitehead appeals from the district court's orders dismissing his civil action and denying his motion for recusal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Whitehead v. Viacom, Inc., 233 F.Supp.2d 715 (D.Md.2002). We deny Whitehead's motions for an evidentiary hearing, for injunctive relief, and to strike the Appellee's informal brief, and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.