Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Carolyn Delio, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2000-12-27
Citations: 278 A.D.2d 918
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carolyn Delio, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 278
Pages: 918–919

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carolyn Delio, Appellant.
[718 NYS2d 678]

Opinion:
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: By failing to move to withdraw her guilty plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction, defendant failed to preserve for our review her contention that she did not knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily enter her guilty plea (see, People v Toxey, 86 NY2d 725, 726, rearg denied 86 NY2d 839; People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665). The statements of defendant do not cast significant doubt on her guilt or otherwise call into question the voluntariness of the plea to bring this case within the narrow exception to the preservation doctrine (see, People v Toxey, supra, at 726; People v Lopez, supra, at 666). The sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Henry, Jr., J. — Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 2nd Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Hayes and Scudder, JJ.