Case Name: RAILWAY LABOR EXECUTIVES' ASSOCIATION, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF GALVESTON, TEXAS, acting By and Through the BOARD of TRUSTEES of the GALVESTON WHARVES, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1990-04-18
Citations: 898 F.2d 481
Docket Number: No. 90-2070
Parties: RAILWAY LABOR EXECUTIVES’ ASSOCIATION, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF GALVESTON, TEXAS, acting By and Through the BOARD of TRUSTEES of the GALVESTON WHARVES, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before RUBIN, POLITZ, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 898
Pages: 481–482

Head Matter:
RAILWAY LABOR EXECUTIVES’ ASSOCIATION, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF GALVESTON, TEXAS, acting By and Through the BOARD of TRUSTEES of the GALVESTON WHARVES, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 90-2070.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 18, 1990.
John O.B. Clarke, Jr., Elizabeth A. Na-deau, Highsaw, Mahoney & Clarke, Washington, D.C., Marc A. Zito, Jones & Gran-ger, Houston, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellants.
Benjamin R. Powel, McCleod, Alexander, Powel & Apffel, Galveston, Tex., Arthur L. Dent, III, Houston, Tex., for City of Galveston.
Devin J. Dowd, Frank Dengelesi, Slover & Loftus, Washington, D.C., for Galveston Ry.
Richard T. Conway, Shea & Gardner, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae National Ry. Labor Conference.
Before RUBIN, POLITZ, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ALVIN B. RUBIN, Circuit Judge:
Because the pendency of the interlocutory appeal from the district court's judgment denying the preliminary injunction did not divest the district court of jurisdiction to proceed with other aspects of the case, that court did not act improperly in considering the plaintiff's petition for a permanent injunction. For the reasons given in Railway Labor Executives' Association v. City of Galveston, 897 F.2d 164 (5th Cir.1990), we affirm the district courts judgment denying that petition.
. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 62(c); Plaquemines Parish Comm'n Council v. United States, 416 F.2d 952, 954 (5th Cir.1969); 11 C. Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice & Procedure § 2962, at 631-32 (1973).