Case Name: Shadia Elamin, Respondent, v. Roberts Express, Inc., et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2002-01-15
Citations: 290 A.D.2d 291
Docket Number: 
Parties: Shadia Elamin, Respondent, v Roberts Express, Inc., et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 290
Pages: 291–291

Head Matter:
Shadia Elamin, Respondent, v Roberts Express, Inc., et al., Appellants.
[735 NYS2d 549]

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lowe, III, J.), entered April 6, 2001, which denied defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Conflicting deposition testimony as to whether, as plaintiff claims, she was struck by defendants' vehicle while crossing the street, or whether, as defendants claim, the vehicle stopped before she came in contact with it, raises an issue of credibility inappropriate for resolution on a motion for summary judgment (see, Sanchez v Finke, 288 AD2d 122). Concur — Andrias, J.P., Rosenberger, Lerner, Buckley and Marlow, JJ.