Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Monthgomery Salvador MAYORGA-CASTILLO, also known as Salvador Lubian Castillo-Garcia, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-10-02
Citations: 698 F. App'x 208
Docket Number: No. 17-40029 Summary Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Monthgomery Salvador MAYORGA-CASTILLO, also known as Salvador Lubian Castillo-Garcia, Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before WIENER, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 698
Pages: 208–208

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Monthgomery Salvador MAYORGA-CASTILLO, also known as Salvador Lubian Castillo-Garcia, Defendant-Appellant
No. 17-40029 Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed October 2, 2017
Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Monthgomery Salvador Mayorga-Castil-lo, Pro Se
Before WIENER, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Monthgomery Salvador May-orga-Castillo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Mayorga-Castillo has been informed of the motion and has not filed a response.
We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, and determine that "counsel has diligently investigated the possible grounds for appeal." Anders, 386 U.S. at 742, 87 S.Ct. 1396. We agree with counsel's assessment that Mayorga-Castillo can raise no nonfrivolous issue on appeal challenging either his guilty plea or his sentence. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.