Case Name: Christopher Newton WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant Helen Louise White, Plaintiff v. Judge Jay FINCH; Brenda Deshields, Court Clerk; Tammy Mullins, Attorney for the Department of Human Services; Candace Gonzales, Department of Human Services; Ken Farris; Connie Farris; Billy Fouts; Tammy Fouts, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-11-07
Citations: 490 F. App'x 841
Docket Number: No. 12-1851
Parties: Christopher Newton WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant Helen Louise White, Plaintiff v. Judge Jay FINCH; Brenda Deshields, Court Clerk; Tammy Mullins, Attorney for the Department of Human Services; Candace Gonzales, Department of Human Services; Ken Farris; Connie Farris; Billy Fouts; Tammy Fouts, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 490
Pages: 841–842

Head Matter:
Christopher Newton WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant Helen Louise White, Plaintiff v. Judge Jay FINCH; Brenda Deshields, Court Clerk; Tammy Mullins, Attorney for the Department of Human Services; Candace Gonzales, Department of Human Services; Ken Farris; Connie Farris; Billy Fouts; Tammy Fouts, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 12-1851.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 6, 2012.
Filed: Nov. 7, 2012.
Christopher Newton White, Grady, AR, pro se.
William Shane Cater, Arkansas Department of Human Services Office of Chief Counsel, Little Rock, AR, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
[Unpublished]
PER CURIAM.
Arkansas inmate Christopher White appeals the district court's dismissal of his complaint brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 1985, in which he alleged that defendants associated with the Arkansas Department of Human Services and a Benton County, Arkansas court, together with four Arkansas residents, conspired to impede an implied agreement he had with one defendant to return his biological daughters, over whom his parental rights were terminated in 2008. Upon careful de novo review, we conclude that the district court properly dismissed the complaint, because it is time-barred in part and otherwise fails to state a claim under section 1983 or 1985. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Erin Set-ser, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.