Case Name: Niurka Andino, Appellant-Respondent, v. Ronald Mills et al., Respondents-Appellants. (And a Third-Party Action.)
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2016-08-25
Citations: 27 N.Y.3d 1180
Docket Number: 
Parties: Niurka Andino, Appellant-Respondent, v Ronald Mills et al., Respondents-Appellants. (And a Third-Party Action.)
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 27
Pages: 1180–1180

Head Matter:
Niurka Andino, Appellant-Respondent, v Ronald Mills et al., Respondents-Appellants. (And a Third-Party Action.)
Decided August 25, 2016

Opinion:
Appeals dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that the Appellate Division does not have the power to grant leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals on a certified question from an order granting a new trial (see CPLR 5601 [c]; 5602 [b] [1]; Maynard v Greenberg, 82 NY2d 913, 914 [1994]; Fishman v Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth., 78 NY2d 878, 878 [1991]).