Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Glynn BYRD, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1976-02-25
Citations: 528 F.2d 549
Docket Number: No. 73-1426
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Glynn BYRD, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before BELL, GODBOLD and IN-GRAHAM, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 528
Pages: 549–551

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Glynn BYRD, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 73-1426
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Feb. 25, 1976.
Warren Heagy, Odessa, Tex., for defendant-appellant.
Anthony J. P. Farris, U. S. Atty., Robert Darden, Asst. U. S. Atty., Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion Oct. 8, 1975, 5 Cir., 1975, 520 F.2d 1101).
Before BELL, GODBOLD and IN-GRAHAM, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The original panel decision reversed the conviction of appellant on the ground the search of his automobile was unconstitutional, 483 F.2d 1196. We granted the government's petition for rehearing, abandoned our reliance upon Almeida-Sanchez, but on the basis of other authorities sustained the reversal, 494 F.2d 1284.
The government petitioned for rehearing en banc, and on October 8, 1975 that petition was denied, 520 F.2d 1101. The government has now filed another petition for rehearing and a supplemental petition for rehearing en banc, directed to the order of October 8, 1975.
Assuming in the peculiar circumstance of this case, that the government has a right to file the petition for rehearing now before us, it is denied, and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the court having requested that the court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the petition for rehearing en banc is denied.
. Almeida-Sanchez v. United States, 413 U.S. 266, 93 S.Ct. 2535, 37 L.Ed.2d 596 (1973).
. 413 U.S. 266, 93 S.Ct. 2535, 37 L.Ed.2d 596 (1973).