Case Name: WILLIAM VOESSLER, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. PALM FETCHTELER & COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1939-04-21
Citations: 122 N.J.L. 434
Docket Number: 
Parties: WILLIAM VOESSLER, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. PALM FETCHTELER & COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 122
Pages: 434–434

Head Matter:
WILLIAM VOESSLER, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. PALM FETCHTELER & COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Argued February 8, 1939
Decided April 21, 1939.
For the respondent-appellant, Edwin J. O'Brien, William J. Egan, assistant attorney-general (Stephen J. Lorenz, of counsel).
For the petitioner-respondent, Henry Harris.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Case in the Supreme Court. Under its seventh point the appellant calls our attention to Pamph. L. 1938, ch. 198, p. 474 (R. S. 34:15-94, 95 and 95.1). This amendment was approved May 18th, 1938, and went into effect immediately. The cause here under consideration was submitted to the Supreme Court at the May term, 1938. The amendment does not affect the judgment in this cause because it is not retroactive.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Parker, Bodine, Heiler, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Hague, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.