Case Name: Keith BAIN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-10-29
Citations: 93 S.W.3d 761
Docket Number: No. 80996
Parties: Keith BAIN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before PAUL J. SIMON, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, SR. J., and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 93
Pages: 761–762

Head Matter:
Keith BAIN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. 80996.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Oct. 29, 2002.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 14, 2003.
Nancy L. Vincent, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Karen L. Kramer, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before PAUL J. SIMON, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, SR. J., and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Keith Bain, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).