Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tomas RUIZ-GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-06-16
Citations: 185 F. App'x 630
Docket Number: No. 05-10684
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Tomas RUIZ-GONZALEZ, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: KLEINFELD, PAEZ and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 185
Pages: 630–631

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Tomas RUIZ-GONZALEZ, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 05-10684.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 12, 2006.
Decided June 16, 2006.
Christine S. Watson, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Barry J. Portman, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: KLEINFELD, PAEZ and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Tomas Ruiz-Gonzalez appeals the sentence imposed following his conviction for unlawful reentry of a deported alien in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Ruiz-Gonzalez contends that the district court erred in enhancing his sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) based on a non-jury fact-finding regarding his prior conviction. As Ruiz-Gonzalez concedes, his contention is foreclosed by this court's precedent, and he raises the issue only to preserve it should legal precedent change. See United States v. Weiland, 420 F.3d 1062, 1079 n. 16 (9th Cir.2005) (holding that we are bound to follow Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), even though it has been called into question, unless it is explicitly overruled by the Supreme Court); United States v. Quintana-Quintana, 383 F.3d 1052, 1053 (9th Cir.2004).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.