Case Name: David HOWETH, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant v. Assistant Warden David L. HUDSON; Jeffery K. Calfee; Joseph W. Wilson; Major Gary L. Gray; Unknown Major Thomas; Sergeant of Corrections Officer Frank G. Warner; Captain Tony C. Carr; Lieutenant Jordan Smith, Jr.,; Major Gueillermo de la Rosa; Major Jeffery W. Cato; Kenneth R. Thompson, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-12-16
Citations: 357 F. App'x 599
Docket Number: No. 09-40317
Parties: David HOWETH, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant v. Assistant Warden David L. HUDSON; Jeffery K. Calfee; Joseph W. Wilson; Major Gary L. Gray; Unknown Major Thomas; Sergeant of Corrections Officer Frank G. Warner; Captain Tony C. Carr; Lieutenant Jordan Smith, Jr.,; Major Gueillermo de la Rosa; Major Jeffery W. Cato; Kenneth R. Thompson, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: JOLLY, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 357
Pages: 599–600

Head Matter:
David HOWETH, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant v. Assistant Warden David L. HUDSON; Jeffery K. Calfee; Joseph W. Wilson; Major Gary L. Gray; Unknown Major Thomas; Sergeant of Corrections Officer Frank G. Warner; Captain Tony C. Carr; Lieutenant Jordan Smith, Jr.,; Major Gueillermo de la Rosa; Major Jeffery W. Cato; Kenneth R. Thompson, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 09-40317
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 16, 2009.
David Howeth, Jr., Woodville, TX, pro se.
Calysta Johnson, Office of the Attorney General Law Enforcement Defense Div., Austin, TX, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: JOLLY, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Plaintiff-Appellant David Howeth Jr., TDCJ prison number 1174154, appeals from the ruling of the district court granting qualified immunity to all Defendants-Appellants, and dismissing Howeth's action with prejudice. All parties having dispensed with oral argument, we decide this appeal on the basis of the briefs and record. Our review of the record on appeal and the law as applicable to the facts presented satisfies us that the district court ruled correctly, committing no error in disposing of this case. Accordingly, essentially for the reasons given by that court, its rulings are, in all respects,
AFFIRMED.
Furthermore, Howeth's Motion For Appointment Of Counsel is, DENIED AS MOOT.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.