Case Name: William DOMBECK, Appellant, v. Hans U. BOTHMANN, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1980-07-22
Citations: 386 So. 2d 41
Docket Number: No. 79-1359
Parties: William DOMBECK, Appellant, v. Hans U. BOTHMANN, Appellee.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, SCHWARTZ and NESBITT, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 386
Pages: 41–41

Head Matter:
William DOMBECK, Appellant, v. Hans U. BOTHMANN, Appellee.
No. 79-1359.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 22, 1980.
Zyne & Wehby and Rosemary J. Zyne, Miami, for appellant.
Arthur Newman, Miami, for appellee.
Before BARKDULL, SCHWARTZ and NESBITT, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The summary judgment entered for the defendant below in an action for fraud is reversed because the record discloses the existence of genuine issues of material fact as to (a) whether the defendant made intentional misrepresentations to the plaintiff and (b) whether the plaintiff justifiably relied upon those misrepresentations to his financial detriment. Nessim v. DeLoache, 384 So.2d 1341 (Fla.3d DCA 1980), and eases cited; Martin v. Paskow, 339 So.2d 266 (Fla.3d DCA 1976), cert. denied, 348 So.2d 451 (Fla.1977); Alepgo Corp. v. Pozin, 114 So.2d 645 (Fla.3d DCA 1959), cert. denied, 117 So.2d 842 (Fla.1960); see Board of Public Instruction v. Everett W. Martin & Son, Inc., 97 So.2d 21 (Fla.1957); Upledger v. Vilanor, Inc., 369 So.2d 427 (Fla.2d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 378 So.2d 350 (Fla.1979).