Case Name: ADAMS v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1913-06-18
Citations: 158 S.W. 303
Docket Number: 
Parties: ADAMS v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 158
Pages: 303–303

Head Matter:
ADAMS v. STATE.
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
June 18, 1913.)
Criminal Law (§ 1090 ) — Appeal—Recobd.
■ The denial of a motion for a new trial cannot be reviewed where the record contains neither a statement of facts nor bills of exception.
[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2653, 2789, 2803-2822, 2825-2827, 2927, 2928, 2948, 3204; Dec. Dig. § 1090. ]
Appeal from District Court, Bexar County; W. S. Anderson, Judge.
Effie Adams was convicted of theft from the person, and she appeals.
Affirmed.
C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
For other oases see same topic and section NUMBER in Dec. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key-No. Series & Rep’r Indexes

Opinion:
DAVIDSON, P. J.
Appellant was convicted of theft from the person; her punishment being assessed at two. years' confinement in the penitentiary. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. In the absence of both, the grounds of the motion for new trial present nothing that can be intelligenty reviewed.
The judgment is affirmed.