Case Name: In re: Natalie M. WILLIAMS, Debtor. Natalie M. Williams, Debtor-Appellant, v. The New York State Higher Education Services Corporation, Educational Credit Management Corporation, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Creditors-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-01-12
Citations: 84 F. App'x 158
Docket Number: No. 03-5039
Parties: In re: Natalie M. WILLIAMS, Debtor. Natalie M. Williams, Debtor-Appellant, v. The New York State Higher Education Services Corporation, Educational Credit Management Corporation, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Creditors-Appellees.
Judges: PRESENT: JACOBS, STRAUB, Circuit Judges, and CARMAN, Judge.
Reporter: West's Bankruptcy Reporter
Volume: 305
Pages: 158–158

Head Matter:
In re: Natalie M. WILLIAMS, Debtor. Natalie M. Williams, Debtor-Appellant, v. The New York State Higher Education Services Corporation, Educational Credit Management Corporation, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Creditors-Appellees.
No. 03-5039.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Jan. 12, 2004.
Natalie M. Williams, New York, NY, for Appellant, pro se.
Lawrence L. Glick, Garden City, N.Y. (Cheryl B. Fisher, New York State Higher Education Services Corporation, Office of Counsel — EFMC, Albany, NY, for The New York State Higher Education Services Corporation, on the brief; Sheila A. Denton, Pullman & Comley, LLC, Bridgeport, CT, for Educational Credit Management Corporation, on the brief; Lawrence L. Glick, Garden City, NY, for University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, on the brief), for Appellees.
PRESENT: JACOBS, STRAUB, Circuit Judges, and CARMAN, Judge.
The Honorable Gregory W. Carman, Judge, United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
SUMMARY ORDER
Debtor Natalie M. Williams appeals from the judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Scheindlin, /.), affirming the order of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (Blackshear, B.J.) and concluding that "Williams' student loans cannot be discharged, forgiven, or deferred." Familiarity is assumed as to the facts, the procedural context, and the specification of appellate issues.
In reviewing the district court's disposition of a bankruptcy appeal, this Court reviews legal conclusions de novo and factual findings for clear error. E.g., In re Best Prods. Co., 68 F.3d 26, 29 (2d Cir.1995). For substantially the reasons stated by the district court, its judgment upholding the bankruptcy court's order is affirmed.
This Court previously denied Williams' motion to proffer new evidence on appeal.
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.