Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard L. BRADLEY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-10-11
Citations: 20 F. App'x 193
Docket Number: No. 01-1757
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard L. BRADLEY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 20
Pages: 193–194

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard L. BRADLEY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 01-1757.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 4, 2001.
Decided Oct. 11, 2001.
Richard L. Bradley, pro se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, VA, for appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Richard L. Bradley appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for reconsideration challenging service of process. We have reviewed the record and the district court's order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Bradley, No. CA-00-12-3 (W-D-Va. May 1, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.