Case Name: Russell WILKERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-06-11
Citations: 599 So. 2d 1053
Docket Number: No. 91-1153
Parties: Russell WILKERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ZEHMER and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 599
Pages: 1053–1053

Head Matter:
Russell WILKERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 91-1153.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
June 11, 1992.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Steven A. Been, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Carolyn J. Mosley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

Opinion:
WOLF, Judge.
We find no merit in appellant's claim that a violation of the prohibition against double jeopardy occurred. See Goene v. State, 577 So.2d 1306 (Fla.1991). We must, however, remand for resentencing since it is not clear that the state established that the defendant qualified as a habitual offender. The trial court stated that the defendant stipulated as part of the plea agreement that he was a habitual offender. It appears from the record that the stipulation only addressed the state's right to assert that the defendant was a habitual offender. Jefferson v. State, 571 So.2d 70 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).
We, therefore, affirm the conviction, but reverse and remand for resentencing at which time the state may demonstrate whether appellant qualifies as a habitual offender. Johnson v. State, 576 So.2d 916 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1991).
ZEHMER and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.