Case Name: Temple v. Synthes Corp., Ltd.; Shelton v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority; Falkner et ux. v. United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida; Edwards v. United States, In re May, Dabish v. Chrysler Corp.; Carvalho v. Public Employees Federation et al.; Jarallah v. Pickett Hotel Co., dba Pickett Suite Hotel, et al.; Coombs v. N. L. Chemicals, Inc., et al., In re Alston, Watts v. Cullinane et al.; Watkins v. Department of the Treasury et al.; Amodeo v. Columbia Broadcasting System et al.; Jones v. Mendenhall et al.; Cox v. Carroll, Warden; Stepler v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority et al.; Schlicher v. Davies et al.; Hirsch v. Oregon; Young v. United States; Searcy v. Houston Lighting & Power Co. et al.; McColpin v. Foulston; Van Leeuwen et al. v. McCorkindale, Circuit Judge, Arkansas, et al.; Ford v. United States; Marshburn v. Richardson; Weber v. California State Bar et al.; Ganey v. Johnson et al.; Sindram v. Moran et al.
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1991-01-07
Citations: 498 U.S. 1042
Docket Number: No. 90-295; No. 90-430; No. 90-475; No. 90-5380; No. 90-5472; No. 90-5574; No. 90-5580; No. 90-5585; No. 90-5614; No. 90-5643; No. 90-5660; No. 90-5695; No. 90-5703; No. 90-5727; No. 90-5732; No. 90-5760; No. 90-5784; No. 90-5786; No. 90-5795; No. 90-5799; No. 90-5809; No. 90-5834; No. 90-5858; No. 90-5866; No. 90-5878; No. 90-5880; No. 90-5885
Parties: Temple v. Synthes Corp., Ltd., Shelton v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority, Falkner et ux. v. United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Edwards v. United States, In re May, Dabish v. Chrysler Corp., Carvalho v. Public Employees Federation et al., Jarallah v. Pickett Hotel Co., dba Pickett Suite Hotel, et al., Coombs v. N. L. Chemicals, Inc., et al., In re Alston, Watts v. Cullinane et al., Watkins v. Department of the Treasury et al., Amodeo v. Columbia Broadcasting System et al., Jones v. Mendenhall et al., Cox v. Carroll, Warden, Stepler v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority et al., Schlicher v. Davies et al., Hirsch v. Oregon, Young v. United States, Searcy v. Houston Lighting & Power Co. et al., McColpin v. Foulston, Van Leeuwen et al. v. McCorkindale, Circuit Judge, Arkansas, et al., Ford v. United States, Marshburn v. Richardson, Weber v. California State Bar et al., Ganey v. Johnson et al., Sindram v. Moran et al.,
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 498
Pages: 1042–1043

Head Matter:
No. 90-295.
No. 90-430.
No. 90-475.
No. 90-5380.
No. 90-5472.
No. 90-5574.
No. 90-5580.
No. 90-5585.
No. 90-5614.
No. 90-5643.
No. 90-5660.
No. 90-5695.
No. 90-5703.
No. 90-5727.
No. 90-5732.
No. 90-5760.
No. 90-5784.
No. 90-5786.
No. 90-5795.
No. 90-5799.
No. 90-5809.
No. 90-5834.
No. 90-5858.
No. 90-5866.
No. 90-5878.
No. 90-5880.
Temple v. Synthes Corp., Ltd., Shelton v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority, Falkner et ux. v. United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Edwards v. United States, In re May, Dabish v. Chrysler Corp., Carvalho v. Public Employees Federation et al., Jarallah v. Pickett Hotel Co., dba Pickett Suite Hotel, et al., Coombs v. N. L. Chemicals, Inc., et al., In re Alston, Watts v. Cullinane et al., Watkins v. Department of the Treasury et al., Amodeo v. Columbia Broadcasting System et al., Jones v. Mendenhall et al., Cox v. Carroll, Warden, Stepler v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority et al., Schlicher v. Davies et al., Hirsch v. Oregon, Young v. United States, Searcy v. Houston Lighting & Power Co. et al., McColpin v. Foulston, Van Leeuwen et al. v. McCorkindale, Circuit Judge, Arkansas, et al., Ford v. United States, Marshburn v. Richardson, Weber v. California State Bar et al., Ganey v. Johnson et al., Sindram v. Moran et al.,

Opinion:
ante, p. 5;
ante, p. 941;
ante, p. 959;
ante, p. 969;
ante, p. 944;
ante, p. 944;
ante, p. 944;
ante, p. 945;
ante, p. 945;
ante, p. 957;
ante, p. 946;
ante, p. 969;
ante, p. 960;
ante, p. 969;
ante, p. 960;
ante, p. 970;
ante, p. 970;
ante, p. 949;
ante, p. 961;
ante, p. 970;
ante, p. 971;
ante, p. 987;
ante, p. 961;
ante, p. 987;
ante, p. 971;
ante, p. 988; and
No. 90-5885.
ante, p. 988. Petitions for rehearing denied.