Case Name: Don DOLL and Karen Doll, Appellants, v. William C. KISER and Eileen Rodriguez-Kiser, Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-10-23
Citations: 383 S.W.3d 70
Docket Number: No. ED 98000
Parties: Don DOLL and Karen Doll, Appellants, v. William C. KISER and Eileen Rodriguez-Kiser, Respondents.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., C.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 383
Pages: 70–70

Head Matter:
Don DOLL and Karen Doll, Appellants, v. William C. KISER and Eileen Rodriguez-Kiser, Respondents.
No. ED 98000.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Oct. 23, 2012.
David S. Corwin, Michael J. Hart, Michael A. Gross, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Richard E. Coughlin, Clayton, MO, for Respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., C.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
. Don Doll and Karen Doll ("Plaintiffs") appeal the trial court's judgment in favor of William C. Kiser and Eileen Rodriguez-Kiser ("Defendants") on Plaintiffs' petition to quiet title. We find that the trial court did not err in denying Plaintiffs' claims for prescriptive easement and trespass. We affirm.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).