Case Name: Iva ROBBINS; Ivan Robbins, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ALEXANDRIA REDEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING AUTHORITY, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-12-19
Citations: 671 F. App'x 871
Docket Number: No. 16-1329
Parties: Iva ROBBINS; Ivan Robbins, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ALEXANDRIA REDEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING AUTHORITY, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 671
Pages: 871–872

Head Matter:
Iva ROBBINS; Ivan Robbins, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ALEXANDRIA REDEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING AUTHORITY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 16-1329
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: December 15, 2016
Decided: December 19, 2016
Iva Robbins, Ivan Robbins, Appellants Pro Se. David Drake Hudgins, Amanda Murray Schwartz, Hudgins Law Firm, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Plaintiffs Iva and Ivan Robbins appeal the district court's orders granting the Alexandria Redevelopment and Housing Authority summary judgment on Plaintiffs' 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action, and denying Plaintiffs' Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's orders. See Robbins v. Alexandria Redevelopment & Hous. Auth., No. 1:15-cv-00839-AJT-TCB (E.D. Va. Feb. 26, 2016; Mar, 18, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED