Case Name: Elizabeth Pepe, Respondent, v. William Jankowski, an Infant, by Paul Jankowski, His Guardian ad Litem, Appellant. Samuel Pepe, Plaintiff, v. William Jankowski, an Infant, by Paul Jankowski, His Guardian ad Litem, Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1931-03
Citations: 232 A.D. 863
Docket Number: 
Parties: Elizabeth Pepe, Respondent, v. William Jankowski, an Infant, by Paul Jankowski, His Guardian ad Litem, Appellant. Samuel Pepe, Plaintiff, v. William Jankowski, an Infant, by Paul Jankowski, His Guardian ad Litem, Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 232
Pages: 863–863

Head Matter:
Elizabeth Pepe, Respondent, v. William Jankowski, an Infant, by Paul Jankowski, His Guardian ad Litem, Appellant. Samuel Pepe, Plaintiff, v. William Jankowski, an Infant, by Paul Jankowski, His Guardian ad Litem, Defendant.

Opinion:
Judgment and order in the action of Elizabeth Repe v. Jankowski unanimously affirmed, with costs, on the ground that these are separate actions, and the jury was justified in finding in the companion action of the husband, Samuel Pepe v. Jankowski, that he had suffered no substantial damage.