Case Name: James C. BLYTHE v. Edward L. DOHENY et al.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1936-09-08
Citations: 85 F.2d 1009
Docket Number: No. 8324
Parties: James C. BLYTHE v. Edward L. DOHENY et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 85
Pages: 1009–1009

Head Matter:
James C. BLYTHE v. Edward L. DOHENY et al.
No. 8324.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Sept. 8, 1936.
L. Frank Ottofy, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
Wellborn & Wellborn, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees.
Before DENMAN and MATHEWS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Upon stipulation of counsel for respective parties, ordered appeal dismissed, with prejudice, that a judgment of dismissal be filed and entered accordingly, and the mandate of this court issued forthwith.