Case Name: CHONG SU YI, People of Similar Situations, Plaintiff-Appellant v. GOLDEN CORRAL, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-12-19
Citations: 671 F. App'x 177
Docket Number: No. 16-1721
Parties: CHONG SU YI, People of Similar Situations, Plaintiff-Appellant v. GOLDEN CORRAL, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 671
Pages: 177–178

Head Matter:
CHONG SU YI, People of Similar Situations, Plaintiff-Appellant v. GOLDEN CORRAL, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 16-1721
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: December 15, 2016
Decided: December 19, 2016
Chong Su Yi, Appellant Pro Se.
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Chong Su Yi appeals the district court's order dismissing his complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no-reversible error. Accordingly, we modify the district court's order to show that the dismissal is without prejudice and affirm as modified for the reasons stated by the district court. Yi v. Golden Corral, No. 8:16-ev-01151-TDC (D. Md. May 31, 2016); see also Nagy v. FMC Butner, 376 F.3d 252, 258 (4th Cir. 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED