Case Name: Randy Craig TEINERT, Appellant, v. Rachel K. PAULOS, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-08-14
Citations: 331 F. App'x 427
Docket Number: No. 08-2605
Parties: Randy Craig TEINERT, Appellant, v. Rachel K. PAULOS, Appellee.
Judges: Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 331
Pages: 427–428

Head Matter:
Randy Craig TEINERT, Appellant, v. Rachel K. PAULOS, Appellee.
No. 08-2605.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 3, 2009.
Filed: Aug. 14, 2009.
Randy Craig Teinert, Plymouth, MN, pro se.
Cameron Hayden, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Bismarck, ND, for Appellee.
Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Randy Teinert appeals from the district court's order dismissing his complaint for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. Upon de novo review, see Hastings v. Wilson, 516 F.3d 1055, 1058 (8th Cir.2008), we conclude that dismissal was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.