Case Name: American Sandpaper Company vs. Waltham Factories, Inc.
Court: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Jurisdiction: Massachusetts
Decision Date: 1938-02-02
Citations: 299 Mass. 369
Docket Number: 
Parties: American Sandpaper Company vs. Waltham Factories, Inc.
Judges: 
Reporter: Massachusetts Reports
Volume: 299
Pages: 369–370

Head Matter:
American Sandpaper Company vs. Waltham Factories, Inc.
Middlesex.
November 2, 1937.
February 2, 1938.
Present: Field, Lummus, Qua, & Dolan, JJ.
E. R. Anderson, (S. S. Ganz with him,) for the plaintiff.
J. P. Rooney, (W. A. Ryan with him,) for the defendant.

Opinion:
Qua, J.
The plaintiff seeks to recover in tort for the destruction of its merchandise located in a building the first floor of which is leased from the defendant, caused by water which the defendant allowed to leak from pipes on the floor above.
The lease from the defendant to the plaintiff contained a provision whereby the plaintiff lessee agreed that it would "hold the lessor [defendant] harmless and indemnified against any injury, loss or damage to any person or property on said premises." Such a covenant as this by a lessee has been construed to place the entire risk of loss upon him and hence constitutes a complete bar to an action by him against his lessor, even when the damage is caused by the lessor's own negligence. Henry H. Tuttle Co. v. Phipps, 219 Mass. 474. Clarke v. Ames, 267 Mass. 44. J. W. Grady Co. v. Herrick, 288 Mass. 304, 308, 309. We find no solid ground on which the case at bar can be distinguished from these cases. The agreements of indemnity in Boston & Maine Railroad v. T. Stuart & Son Co. 236 Mass. 98, 103, New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. T. Stuart & Son Co. 260 Mass. 242, 249, 250, and Gast v. Goldenberg, 281 Mass. 214, cited by the plaintiff, were included in contracts of an entirely different type. See Ortolano v. U-Dryvit Auto Rental Co. Inc. 296 Mass. 439, 440.
It is unnecessary to deal with the requests for rulings in detail. In accordance with the stipulation of the parties the finding for the defendant is to stand.
So ordered.