Case Name: David W. WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ernie ROE, Warden; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-08-15
Citations: 73 F. App'x 263
Docket Number: No. 03-55245; D.C. No. CV-02-04615-DDP
Parties: David W. WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ernie ROE, Warden; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 73
Pages: 263–264

Head Matter:
David W. WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ernie ROE, Warden; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 03-55245.
D.C. No. CV-02-04615-DDP.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 11, 2003.
Decided Aug. 15, 2003.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
California state prisoner David W. Wilson appeals pro se the district court's judgment dismissing without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies Wilson's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1177 (9th Cir. 2003), and we affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Wilson's action because Wilson's own sub missions demonstrate that he failed to exhaust prison administrative remedies prior to filing his complaint. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a); McKinney v. Carey, 311 F.3d 1198, 1199 (9th Cir.2002) (per curiam).
Wilson's motion for appointment of counsel is denied.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.