Case Name: Sarah L. Remer, complainant-respondent, v. Frances J. Benedict et al., defendants-respondents, and James C. Bioren, defendant-appellant
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1913-03-05
Citations: 81 N.J. Eq. 222
Docket Number: 
Parties: Sarah L. Remer, complainant-respondent, v. Frances J. Benedict et al., defendants-respondents, and James C. Bioren, defendant-appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 81
Pages: 222–222

Head Matter:
Sarah L. Remer, complainant-respondent, v. Frances J. Benedict et al., defendants-respondents, and James C. Bioren, defendant-appellant.
[Submitted January 3d, 1912.
Decided March 5th, 1913.]
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by ■Vice-Chancellor Emery, whose opinion is reported ante p. 21.
Messrs. Coult & Smith and Mr.. Arthur B. Denman, solicitors for and of counsel with James C. Bioren, appellant.
Mr. Charles C. Pilgrim, solicitor for and of counsel with Sarah-L. Remer, respondent.
Messrs. Lum, Tambyln & Colyer, solicitors for and of counsel with Frances J. Benedict and others, respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Emery.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice,- Garrison, Swayze, Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalis oh, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Congdon, Treacy — 12.
For reversal — None.