Case Name: Nadiya Beyan SIRAJ, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-06-08
Citations: 98 F. App'x 965
Docket Number: No. 03-1537
Parties: Nadiya Beyan SIRAJ, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 98
Pages: 965–965

Head Matter:
Nadiya Beyan SIRAJ, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 03-1537.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 16, 2004.
Decided: June 8, 2004.
Aragaw Mehari, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner.
Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Terri J. Scadron, Assistant Director, Nelda C. Ackerman, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Nadiya Beyan Siraj petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("Board") affirming the immigration judge's denial of her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have reviewed the administrative record and the Board's decision and find no reversiblé error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review on the reasoning of the Board. See In re: Siraj, No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ] (B.I.A. Apr. 2, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED