Case Name: UNITED STATES v. HARRIS. In re CHINOOK LUMBER & MFG. CO.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1939-04-20
Citations: 103 F.2d 1020
Docket Number: No. 8816
Parties: UNITED STATES v. HARRIS. In re CHINOOK LUMBER & MFG. CO.
Judges: Before HANEY, HEALY, and STEPHENS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 103
Pages: 1020–1020

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES v. HARRIS. In re CHINOOK LUMBER & MFG. CO.
No. 8816.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
April 20, 1939.
For original opinion, see 100 F.2d 268.
Harry T. Davenport, of Spokane, Wash., for petitioner.
Charles E. Collett, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Sam M. Driver, U. S. Atty., of Spokane, Wash., and Thomas Harris, William D. Donnelly, and Robert H. Fabian, all of Washington, D. C.
Before HANEY, HEALY, and STEPHENS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In the opinion in this case it was held that the United States is entitled to have its claim allowed as a prior claim under § 3466 of the Revised Statutes, 31 U.S.C.A. § 191. Appellee has petitioned for rehearing on this point in view of the later decision of the Supreme Court in United States v. Algoma Lumber Company, 59 S.Ct. 267, 83 L.Ed.
The petition for rehearing is denied on the authority of Bramwell v. U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Company, 9 Cir., 299 F. 705, affirmed in 269 U.S. 483, 46 S.Ct. 176, 70 L.Ed. 368.
Rehearing denied.