Case Name: Robert Lee NEALY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; John J. Lamanna, Warden at FCI Edgefield, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-10-25
Citations: 251 F. App'x 832
Docket Number: No. 07-6933
Parties: Robert Lee NEALY, Petitioner—Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; John J. Lamanna, Warden at FCI Edgefield, Respondents—Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 251
Pages: 832–832

Head Matter:
Robert Lee NEALY, Petitioner—Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; John J. Lamanna, Warden at FCI Edgefield, Respondents—Appellees.
No. 07-6933.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 18, 2007.
Decided: Oct. 25, 2007.
Robert Lee Nealy, Appellant pro se.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Robert Lee Nealy appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Nealy v. United States, No. 8:05-cv-2933-RBH, 2007 WL 1290262 (D.S.C. Apr.30, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.