Case Name: Joseph Strouse et al., Resp'ts, v. The New York El. R. Co. et al., App'lts
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1892-03-31
Citations: 45 N.Y. St. Rep. 937
Docket Number: 
Parties: Joseph Strouse et al., Resp’ts, v. The New York El. R. Co. et al., App’lts.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 45
Pages: 937–937

Head Matter:
Joseph Strouse et al., Resp’ts, v. The New York El. R. Co. et al., App’lts.
Appeal from judgment entered on the report of a referee.
B. Tolies, for app’lts; O. A. B. Pratt, Jr., for resp’ts.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We think the sums fixed by the referee as past damages and as the value of the plaintiffs' easements are not excessive, and are supported by the evidence.
The other questions presented arise in consequence of exceptions to the admission and exclusion of testimony. We think that all of the questions have been passed upon by prior adjudications of this court in favor of the respondents and that no error was committed by the referee that requires us to reverse the judgment.
The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.