Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tommy Wright LANIER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-12-03
Citations: 81 F. App'x 789
Docket Number: No. 03-6767
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Tommy Wright LANIER, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 81
Pages: 789–789

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Tommy Wright LANIER, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 03-6767.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 19, 2003.
Decided Dec. 3, 2003.
George Alan DuBois, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant.
Doug McCullough, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Tommy Wright Lanier seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his motion filed under § 2255 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by the district court on the merits absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Lanier has not made the requisite showing. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED