Case Name: TAGUE v. DELAWARE, L. & W. R. CO.
Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1946-03-13
Citations: 5 F.R.D. 337
Docket Number: Civ. A. No. 5757
Parties: TAGUE v. DELAWARE, L. & W. R. CO.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Rules Decisions
Volume: 5
Pages: 337–337

Head Matter:
TAGUE v. DELAWARE, L. & W. R. CO.
Civ. A. No. 5757.
District Court, E. D. New York.
March 13, 1946.
See, also, 5 F.R.D. 323.
Blank & Convisser, of Brooklyn, N.Y., (William A. Blank, of Brooklyn, N. Y., of counsel), for plaintiff for motion.
John E. Morrissey, of New York City, for defendant, opposed.

Opinion:
INCPI, District Judge.
The motion is granted—such requests are largely in the discretion of the court exercised in accordance with the new Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following § 723c. I see nothing "privileged" as to these reports and written statements. I do not mean by this to decide where oral statements by a client to his attorney is concerned. Nothing of that nature is here presented. These reports and statements may be useful to plaintiff. Connecticut Imp. Co. v. Continental Distilling Corp., D.C., 1 F.R.D. 190.
Settle order.