Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eric WHEELER, a/k/a "E", Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-05-29
Citations: 521 F. App'x 254
Docket Number: No. 13-6332
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eric WHEELER, a/k/a “E”, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 521
Pages: 254–255

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eric WHEELER, a/k/a “E”, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-6332.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 23, 2013.
Decided: May 29, 2013.
Eric Wheeler, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Lee Edwards, Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorneys, Jill Westmoreland Rose, Office of the United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina; Adam Christopher Morris, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Eric Wheeler appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewéd the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Wheeler, No. 4:96-cr-00053-MR-2 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 11, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.