Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DAVID ANDREW JONES, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1992-12-09
Citations: 117 Or. App. 174
Docket Number: 90C-20365; CA A68211
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DAVID ANDREW JONES, Appellant.
Judges: Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Rossman and De Muniz, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 117
Pages: 174–175

Head Matter:
Submitted on appellant’s motion for reconsideration filed November 12,
reconsideration allowed; opinion (116 Or App 393, 842 P2d 419) modified and adhered to as modified December 9, 1992
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DAVID ANDREW JONES, Appellant.
(90C-20365; CA A68211)
842 P2d 466
Jesse Wm. Barton, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, for motion.
Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Rossman and De Muniz, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
We allow defendant's motion for reconsideration. ORAP 9.15(6). In our original decision, State v. Jones, 113 Or App 228, 832 P2d 459 (1992), we remanded for resentencing on two grounds: that the court had erred in imposing sentence under ORS 137.635 on the basis of State v. Haydon, 113 Or App 205, 832 P2d 457 (1992), and that the court had erred in denying defendant credit for time served. On reconsideration, we withdrew our original opinion and remanded for resentencing on the basis of our decision on reconsideration in State v. Haydon, 116 Or App 347, 842 P2d 410 (1992). Accordingly, on further reconsideration, we modify our opinion on reconsideration and adopt the reasoning and conclusion from our original opinion that the sentencing court erred also in denying defendant credit for time served. State v. Jones, supra, 113 Or App at 229.
Reconsideration allowed; opinion modified and adhered to as modified.