Case Name: SWIFT & CO. v. J. B. JEFFREY & SON
Court: Texas Courts of Civil Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1923-04-19
Citations: 250 S.W. 791
Docket Number: No. 1467
Parties: SWIFT & CO. v. J. B. JEFFREY & SON.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 250
Pages: 791–792

Head Matter:
SWIFT & CO. v. J. B. JEFFREY & SON.
(No. 1467.)
(Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. El Paso.
April 19, 1923.)
1. Appeal and error &wkey;>569 (2) — Statement of facts not signed by appellees or their counsel nor approved by trial court not considered.
A statement of facts not signed by appel-lees or their counsel, nor approved by the trial court, cannot be considered.
2. Appeal and error <&wkey;907(3) — Evidence presumed to support judgment in absence of statement of facts.
In the absence of a statement of facts, it must be presumed that the evidence supported the judgment.
Appeal from Comanche County Court; F. J. Reese, Judge.
Proceeding between Swift & Co. and J. B. Jeffrey & Son. . Judgment for the latter, and the former, appeals.
Affirmed.
Y. W. Holmes, of Comanche, for appellant.
R. F. B. Logan, of De Leon, for appellees.

Opinion:
HIGGINS, J.
There is but one assignment, which is to the effect that the judgment is contrary to the undisputed evidence.
There is copied into the transcript what purports to be a statement of facts signed by counsel for appellant, but it is not signed by appellees nor their counsel; neither is it approved by the trial court. This so-called statement of facts cannot be considered. Texas, etc., v. Gonzales (Tex. Civ. App.) 211 S. W. 347; Scaling v. Collins (Tex. Civ. App.) 214 S. W. 624.
In the absence of a statement of facts, is must be presumed that the evidence supported the judgment.
Affirmed.
®=»For other oases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes