Case Name: Anna McNulty, Appellant, v. John Zaganos, Respondent, Impleaded with George LeMar, Doing Business under the Trade Name of Inwood Motor Sales Company, Defendant; Annie McNulty, Appellant, v. John Zaganos, Respondent, Impleaded with George LeMar, Doing Business under the Trade Name of Inwood Motor Sales Company, Defendant; Daniel McNulty, Appellant, v. John Zaganos, Respondent, Impleaded with George LeMar, Doing Business under the Trade Name of Inwood Motor Sales Company, Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1938-11-04
Citations: 255 A.D. 274
Docket Number: 
Parties: Anna McNulty, Appellant, v. John Zaganos, Respondent, Impleaded with George LeMar, Doing Business under the Trade Name of Inwood Motor Sales Company, Defendant. Annie McNulty, Appellant, v. John Zaganos, Respondent, Impleaded with George LeMar, Doing Business under the Trade Name of Inwood Motor Sales Company, Defendant. Daniel McNulty, Appellant, v. John Zaganos, Respondent, Impleaded with George LeMar, Doing Business under the Trade Name of Inwood Motor Sales Company, Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 255
Pages: 274–275

Head Matter:
Anna McNulty, Appellant, v. John Zaganos, Respondent, Impleaded with George LeMar, Doing Business under the Trade Name of Inwood Motor Sales Company, Defendant. Annie McNulty, Appellant, v. John Zaganos, Respondent, Impleaded with George LeMar, Doing Business under the Trade Name of Inwood Motor Sales Company, Defendant. Daniel McNulty, Appellant, v. John Zaganos, Respondent, Impleaded with George LeMar, Doing Business under the Trade Name of Inwood Motor Sales Company, Defendant.
First Department,
November 4, 1938.
John V. Higgins of counsel [Thomas J. O’Neill and Joseph G. Saile with him on the brief; Thomas J. O’Neill, attorney], for the appellants.
William Dike Reed of counsel [Jenkins, Dimmick & Finnegan, attorneys], for the respondent.

Opinion:
Peb Curiam.
Although the original answers were superseded by amended answers, they constituted evidence of ownership by the defendant Zaganos of the automobile involved in the accident. (Weil v. Weil, 227 App. Div. 378; Vermeule v. City of Corning, 186 id. 206; affd., 230 N. Y. 585.)
The judgments in so far as appealed from by the plaintiffs should be reversed, the actions severed and a new trial granted to said plaintiffs as against the defendant John Zaganos, with costs to said plaintiffs-appellants to abide the event.
Townley, Glennon, Untebmyeb and Dobe, JJ., concur; Martin, P. J., dissents and votes for affirmance.