Case Name: BYBEE v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1918-10-23
Citations: 205 S.W. 985
Docket Number: No. 5126
Parties: BYBEE v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 205
Pages: 985–985

Head Matter:
BYBEE v. STATE.
(No. 5126.)
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Oct. 23, 1918.)
Criminal Law <&wkey;1097(6) — Statement oe Pacts — Necessity.
A motion for new trial, claiming that the verdict is contrary to law and evidence, cannot be considered, in absence of a statement of the facts; the indictment being in the usual form.
Appeal from District .Court, McLennan County; R. I. Munroe, Judge.
Homer Bybee was convicted of violating the local option law, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
E. B. Hendricks, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Opinion:
DAVIDSON, P. J.
This conviction was for a violation of the local option law. Appellant's motion for new trial is based upon the ground that the verdict is contrary to the law and the evidence. The record is before us without, a statement of the facts.. The indictment seems to be in the usual form. Without the testimony we cannot review the questions raised in the motion for new trial
The judgment is affirmed. .
(&wkey;>For other cases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numhered Digests and Indexes