Case Name: Jose RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2009-09-04
Citations: 16 So. 3d 317
Docket Number: No. 2D08-5153
Parties: Jose RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: FULMER and WALLACE, JJ„ Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 16
Pages: 317–318

Head Matter:
Jose RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D08-5153.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Sept. 4, 2009.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Matthew D. Bernstein, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Joseph Hwan-Yul Lee, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appel-lee.

Opinion:
NORTHCUTT, Judge.
Jose Rodriguez pleaded guilty to trafficking in illegal drugs, reserving his right to appeal the denial of his dispositive motion to suppress evidence. The State concedes that the motion should have been granted and we agree. We reverse Rodriguez's conviction and remand to the circuit court with directions to discharge him. Our resolution of this issue moots the sentencing issue Rodriguez raised in this appeal.
The illegal drugs were discovered during a patdown search of Rodriguez during a traffic stop. Rodriguez agreed to a search of his car, but he did not consent to a search of his person. The deputy who conducted the traffic stop testified that he routinely conducts a patdown of a vehicle's occupants before he begins searching the car. The deputy did not state any facts that supported a reasonable belief that Rodriguez was armed or dangerous. Such routine searches based on a generalized concern for officer safety are not constitutionally permissible. See McNeil v. State, 995 So.2d 525, 526 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008), review denied, 990 So.2d 1060 (Fla.2008).
Reversed and remanded with directions to discharge Rodriguez.
FULMER and WALLACE, JJ" Concur.