Case Name: Barry John CRATSLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1994-11-16
Citations: 645 So. 2d 1058
Docket Number: No. 93-00407
Parties: Barry John CRATSLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: RYDER, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 645
Pages: 1058–1058

Head Matter:
Barry John CRATSLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 93-00407.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Nov. 16, 1994.
Mark Wolfe, Tampa, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Tonja R. Vickers, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Barry Cratsley challenges the revocation of his probation in case nos. 89-5191, 89-6111, and 90-6037. He contends that his guilty plea was not freely and voluntarily entered.
In order for the issue of the voluntariness of a plea to be considered on direct appeal, a defendant must have filed a motion to withdraw his plea in the trial court. Thomas v. State, 442 So.2d 296 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). Cratsley did not do so.
Accordingly, we affirm Cratsley's judgments and sentences in the aforementioned cases without prejudice to his filing a motion to withdraw his plea in the trial court.
RYDER, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.