Case Name: Edward Nathaniel BELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Fred D. HILDEBRAND, Superintendent; P.J. Krieger, Captain of Security, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-04-18
Citations: 12 F. App'x 120
Docket Number: No. 01-6021
Parties: Edward Nathaniel BELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Fred D. HILDEBRAND, Superintendent; P.J. Krieger, Captain of Security, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 12
Pages: 120–120

Head Matter:
Edward Nathaniel BELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Fred D. HILDEBRAND, Superintendent; P.J. Krieger, Captain of Security, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 01-6021.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 12, 2001.
Decided April 18, 2001.
Edward Nathaniel Bell, pro se.
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Edward Bell, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Bell v. Hildebrand, No. CA-00-637-7 (W.D.Va. filed Dec. 11, 2000; entered Dec. 12, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.