Case Name: Harold SAMHAT and Reliance Insurance Company, Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. Curtis F. GRIFFIN, Jr., Inc., Appellee/Cross-Appellant
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-04-10
Citations: 577 So. 2d 710
Docket Number: No. 90-01786
Parties: Harold SAMHAT and Reliance Insurance Company, Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. Curtis F. GRIFFIN, Jr., Inc., Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
Judges: RYDER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and FRANK, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 577
Pages: 710–710

Head Matter:
Harold SAMHAT and Reliance Insurance Company, Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. Curtis F. GRIFFIN, Jr., Inc., Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
No. 90-01786.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
April 10, 1991.
Nancy G. Farage of Freedman & Farage, P.A., Tampa, for appellants/cross-appel-lees.
Thomas A. Smith, Tampa, for appel-lee/ cross-appellant.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this action for work done on a condominium project this is an appeal by the property owner, Harold Samhat, and the surety, Reliance Insurance Co., from a final judgment in favor of a subcontractor, Curtis F. Griffin, Jr., Inc. Of the five points raised by appellants, we find merit only in their contention that the trial court erred in ruling that Samhat is personally liable to Griffin. See Samhat v. Cocoa Masonry of Pinellas County, Inc., 567 So.2d 450, 451 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). We find no merit in the cross-appeal.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for the vacating of the judgment as to Samhat personally.
RYDER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and FRANK, JJ., concur.