Case Name: Ernest Junior THAMES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dean WALKER, Superintendent, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-07-25
Citations: 41 F. App'x 683
Docket Number: No. 02-6839
Parties: Ernest Junior THAMES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dean WALKER, Superintendent, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 41
Pages: 683–684

Head Matter:
Ernest Junior THAMES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dean WALKER, Superintendent, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 02-6839.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 18, 2002.
Decided July 25, 2002.
Ernest Junior Thames, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Wallace Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Ernest Junior Thames seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Thames v. Walker, No. CA-01-658-1 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 30, 2002). We grant Thames' motion to supplement the record, but deny his motions for appointment of counsel and for transcripts at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.