Case Name: Maxim Gashel et al., Respondents, v. Vladimir Z. Vicas, Appellant, et al., Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1961-01-24
Citations: 12 A.D.2d 752
Docket Number: 
Parties: Maxim Gashel et al., Respondents, v. Vladimir Z. Vicas, Appellant, et al., Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 12
Pages: 752–753

Head Matter:
Maxim Gashel et al., Respondents, v. Vladimir Z. Vicas, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Opinion:
Order entered June 17, 1960, denying defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency, unanimously affirmed, on the law and on the facts, with $20 costs and disbursements to respondents. It is clear, and it was confirmed upon oral argument, that the conferences and conversations alleged by plaintiffs were not pleaded as specific acts constituting due and full performance, but to establish the chronology of events preceding and following the making of the agreement. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.