Case Name: HOMAR ENTERPRISES, INC., Respondent, v. CHESTERFIELD MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, L.P., Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-10-24
Citations: 29 S.W.3d 840
Docket Number: No. ED 77381
Parties: HOMAR ENTERPRISES, INC., Respondent, v. CHESTERFIELD MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, L.P., Appellant.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, P.J., MARY RHODES RUSSELL, J., and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 29
Pages: 840–841

Head Matter:
HOMAR ENTERPRISES, INC., Respondent, v. CHESTERFIELD MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, L.P., Appellant.
No. ED 77381.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Oct. 24, 2000.
Richard S. Bender, Sanford J. Boxer-man, Rosenblum, Goldenhersh, Sikverstein & Zafft, P.C., St. Louis, for appellant.
Steven M. Hamburg, Summers, Compton, Wells & Hamburg, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, P.J., MARY RHODES RUSSELL, J., and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant Chesterfield Management Associates, L.P. ("CMA") appeals from the judgment entered in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County enforcing a settlement agreement between CMA and Homar Enterprises, Inc. and dismissing with prejudice the parties respective claims against each other.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and record on appeal and no error of law appears. No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an extended opinion reciting detailed facts and restating principles of law. We have, however, provided the parties with a memorandum opinion for their exclusive use detailing the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).