Case Name: Donnie DICKERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1987-07-29
Citations: 509 So. 2d 1390
Docket Number: No. BR-476
Parties: Donnie DICKERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: JOANOS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 509
Pages: 1390–1391

Head Matter:
Donnie DICKERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. BR-476.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
July 29, 1987.
Donnie Dickerson, pro se.
No appearance for appellee.

Opinion:
WIGGINTON, Judge.
We affirm the trial court's holding that it had no jurisdiction to consider appellant's motion for post-conviction relief, since the motion was filed during the pendency of appellant's direct appeal in this Court. Carrin v. State, 459 So.2d 430 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Harpham, v. State, 415 So.2d 863 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); cf. Bryan v. State, 470 So.2d 864 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). However, our affirmance is without prejudice to appellant's presenting the issues raised in a proper Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 motion.
JOANOS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.
. We note that appellant's notice of appeal appears to be untimely filed. However, the trial court failed to include in its order " 'a statement that the movant ha[d] the right to appeal within 30 days of the rendition of the order,' " as required by Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850. Williams v. State, 454 So.2d 756, 757, n. 1 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). Therefore, the appeal is correctly treated as one timely filed. Id