Case Name: NEW JERSEY BELL TELEPHONE CO., PROSECUTOR-APPELLANT, v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY AND THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOBOKEN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1944-04-13
Citations: 131 N.J.L. 571
Docket Number: 
Parties: NEW JERSEY BELL TELEPHONE CO., PROSECUTOR-APPELLANT, v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY AND THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOBOKEN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 131
Pages: 571–571

Head Matter:
NEW JERSEY BELL TELEPHONE CO., PROSECUTOR-APPELLANT, v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY AND THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOBOKEN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Argued February 2, 1944
Decided April 13, 1944.
For the appellant, Harrison & Roche & Darby (Thomas Glynn Walker and Robert F. Darby, of counsel).
For the respondents, Edward P. Stout.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court, as supplemented by the opinion of this court in the ease of New Jersey Bell Telephone Co. v. Town of Montclair, decided this day, 131 N. J. L. 564.
For affirmance — Tin® Chancellor, Cm®® Justice, Parker, Bodine, ITelier, Perskie. Porter, Wells, Rafferty, Hague. Thompson, Dili, JJ. 12.
For reversal — Hone.