Case Name: Belle Frick, Respondent, v. Augustus E. Burnett, as Executor, etc., and Another, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1913-10
Citations: 158 A.D. 953
Docket Number: 
Parties: Belle Frick, Respondent, v. Augustus E. Burnett, as Executor, etc., and Another, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 158
Pages: 953–953

Head Matter:
Belle Frick, Respondent, v. Augustus E. Burnett, as Executor, etc., and Another, Appellants.

Opinion:
Judgment reversed upon questions of law and fact, and judgment directed in favor of the defendants dismissing the complaint, with costs, including costs of this appeal. Held, that the motion for the dismissal of the complaint should have been granted. The finding that the plaintiff entered into a contract with defendant's testator to board and care for him, as found by the referee, is disapproved, and this court finds and decides that the evidence is insufficient to warrant any such finding, or that there is anything due or unpaid under any contract, express or implied, for the board of defendant.