Case Name: HAMILTON FOODS, Inc., a Corporation, Appellant, v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, a Corporation, and Jack Belyea, Doing Business as Refrigerated Express Company, Appellee; ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, v. HAMILTON FOODS, Inc., a Corporation, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1949-02-11
Citations: 173 F.2d 573
Docket Number: No. 11961
Parties: HAMILTON FOODS, Inc., a Corporation, Appellant, v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, a Corporation, and Jack Belyea, Doing Business as Refrigerated Express Company, Appel-lee. ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, v. HAMILTON FOODS, Inc., a Corporation, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 173
Pages: 573–573

Head Matter:
HAMILTON FOODS, Inc., a Corporation, Appellant, v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, a Corporation, and Jack Belyea, Doing Business as Refrigerated Express Company, Appel-lee. ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, v. HAMILTON FOODS, Inc., a Corporation, Appellee.
No. 11961.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
Feb. 11, 1949.
Writ of Certiorari Denied May 31, 1949.
See 69 S.Ct. 1158.
Albert H.. Allen and Hyman Goldman, both of Beverly Hills, Cal., for appellant Hamilton Foods.
■ Robert W. Walker and Louis M. Welsh, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co.
Before STEPHENS, HEALY, and ORR, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM. .
This case was tried to the judge without the aid of a jury and, upon a thorough review of the evidence, we find substantial evidence to support the findings and we cannot say that there is clear error in the case. Rule 52.(a), Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. The judgment as to the appeal in Hamilton Foods, Inc., v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company, and Jack Belyea etc., and the judgment as to the cross-appeal in Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company v. Hamilton Foods, Inc., 83 F.Supp. 478, are affirmed.