Case Name: ALEX HOFRICHTER, P.A. f/k/a Hofrichter & Quiat, P.A., and Alex Hofrichter, individually, Appellants, v. DONALD S. ZUCKERMAN, P.A., Zuckerman & Venditti, P.A., and Donald S. Zuckerman, individually, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-09-07
Citations: 623 So. 2d 829
Docket Number: No. 92-2075
Parties: ALEX HOFRICHTER, P.A. f/k/a Hofrichter & Quiat, P.A., and Alex Hofrichter, individually, Appellants, v. DONALD S. ZUCKERMAN, P.A., Zuckerman & Venditti, P.A., and Donald S. Zuckerman, individually, Appellees.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and HUBBART, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 623
Pages: 829–829

Head Matter:
ALEX HOFRICHTER, P.A. f/k/a Hofrichter & Quiat, P.A., and Alex Hofrichter, individually, Appellants, v. DONALD S. ZUCKERMAN, P.A., Zuckerman & Venditti, P.A., and Donald S. Zuckerman, individually, Appellees.
No. 92-2075.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Sept. 7, 1993.
Wolpe, Leibowitz, Berger & Brotman, Alex Hofrichter, Todd Schwartz, Miami, for appellants.
Proenza, White, Huck & Roberts and Paul C. Huck, Miami, for appellees.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and HUBBART, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the post-judgment order denying discovery in aid of execution based on the appellee Donald S. Zuckerman's invocation of his Fifth Amendment privilege against self incrimination, without prejudice to the appellants [Alex Hofrichter, P.A. and Aex Hofri-chter, individually] to raise in the trial court on remand an issue which was expressly reserved by the trial court for future determination, namely, whether the appellee Donald S. Zuckerman has, by his conduct, waived his right to assert his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination in this proceeding. See, e.g., United States v. Argomaniz, 925 F.2d 1349, 1356 (11th Cir.1991); Rainerman v. Eagle Nat'l Bank of Miami, 541 So.2d 740 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).
Affirmed.