Case Name: The CLARK CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. TALMAC, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2007-09-12
Citations: 964 So. 2d 783
Docket Number: No. 3D06-1250
Parties: The CLARK CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. TALMAC, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.
Judges: Before COPE and RAMIREZ, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 964
Pages: 783–783

Head Matter:
The CLARK CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. TALMAC, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.
No. 3D06-1250.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Sept. 12, 2007.
Duane Morris LLP, Boca Raton, and Jeffrey L. Hamera and Charles B. Lewis; Carlton Field and Alina Alonso, Miami, for appellant.
Robinson & Associates and Raymond L. Robinson and Douglas C. Hiller, Coral Gables, for appellee.
Before COPE and RAMIREZ, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a final judgment entered in favor of Talmac, Inc., following a bench trial. We find no error of law and conclude that there was competent substantial evidence to support the judgment. See Pearce & Pearce, Inc. v. Kroh Bros. Dev. Co., 474 So.2d 369 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). It is not our function to re-weigh the evidence and the credibility of the witnesses and substitute our judgment for that of the trial court. G & G Fashion Design, Inc. v. Garcia, 870 So.2d 870, 873 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004).
Affirmed.