Case Name: Steven D. SHIVER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2003-05-09
Citations: 844 So. 2d 760
Docket Number: No. 1D02-965
Parties: Steven D. SHIVER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ALLEN, C.J., WEBSTER and BROWNING, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 844
Pages: 760–761

Head Matter:
Steven D. SHIVER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D02-965.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
May 9, 2003.
Nancy Daniels, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Charlie Crist, Attorney General, and Daniel A. David, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellant challenges his probationary split sentences imposed on February 6, 2002. He timely filed a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2) motion to correct sentencing error, essentially asserting that, pursuant to Waters v. State, 662 So.2d 332 (Fla.1995), he was entitled to credit towards the probationary portion of his split sentences for time previously spent on probation. The state conceded error, and the trial court entered amended orders purporting to adjust the termination dates for the underlying sentences. But the amended orders were not entered within 60 days from the filing of the appellant's motion as required by the rule. Consequently, the trial court lacked jurisdiction to enter the amended orders. See Campbell v. State, 789 So.2d 1213 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). Accordingly, the sentences imposed on February 6, 2002, are REVERSED, the amended orders entered on July 22, 2002, are QUASHED, and the case is REMANDED for resentencing in accordance with Waters.
ALLEN, C.J., WEBSTER and BROWNING, JJ., concur.