Case Name: STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymond James ARAGON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Jurisdiction: New Mexico
Decision Date: 1972-09-15
Citations: 84 N.M. 254
Docket Number: No. 920
Parties: STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymond James ARAGON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: HENDLEY and COWAN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: New Mexico Reports
Volume: 84
Pages: 254–255

Head Matter:
501 P.2d 698
STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymond James ARAGON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 920.
Court of Appeals of New Mexico.
Sept. 15, 1972.
George H. Perez, Albuquerque, for defendant-appellant.
David L. Norvell, Atty. Gen., Ronald Van Amberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for plaintiff-appellee.

Opinion:
OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
Defendant was convicted and sentenced for fraudulent use of a credit card. Section 40A-16-33, N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 6, Supp.1971). Defendant appeals.
We affirm.
Defendant contends the trial court erred in admitting into evidence certain items seized from defendant's automobile during an illegal search and seizure, to wit: a wallet, a Selective Service card, a Shell credit card, and a copy of a charge ticket.
The issue of illegal search and seizure was not presented to the trial court and cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. Neither is it fundamental error. State v. Sisneros, 79 N.M. 600, 446 P.2d 875 (1968); State v. Tapia, 79 N.M. 344, 443 P.2d 514 (Ct.App.1968); State v. Williams, 83 N.M. 477, 493 P.2d 962 (Ct.App.1972).
Affirmed.
It is so ordered.
HENDLEY and COWAN, JJ., concur.