Case Name: Sandra PINEIRO, Appellant, v. LAW FIRM OF FRANKLIN & CRISCUOLO and Rigoberto Pineiro, husband, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2008-02-20
Citations: 976 So. 2d 1146
Docket Number: No. 4D05-4589
Parties: Sandra PINEIRO, Appellant, v. LAW FIRM OF FRANKLIN & CRISCUOLO and Rigoberto Pineiro, husband, Appellees.
Judges: STONE and MAY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 976
Pages: 1146–1146

Head Matter:
Sandra PINEIRO, Appellant, v. LAW FIRM OF FRANKLIN & CRISCUOLO and Rigoberto Pineiro, husband, Appellees.
No. 4D05-4589.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb. 20, 2008.
Rehearing Denied April 10, 2008.
Hal Vogel, Miami, for appellant.
Barry S. Franklin and Donald G. Cris-cuolo of Franklin & Criscuolo, North Miami Beach, for appellees.

Opinion:
POLEN, J.
Appellant Sandra E. Pineiro appeals the trial court's orders denying her motion to vacate orders granted in favor of Appellee, Franklin and Criscuolo (F & C), and granting F & C's motions for a charging lien and final money judgment against Pi-neiro for nonpayment for services rendered. The trial court orally reserved jurisdiction to hold an evidentiary hearing on both parties' section 57.105 claims, but entered a written order reserving jurisdiction only to hear F & C's claims. We affirm the trial court's denial of Pineiro's motion but remand the case to the trial court with instructions to amend the order to reflect its oral ruling reserving jurisdiction to hear both parties' section 57.105 claims. See Romero v. Romero, 916 So.2d 952 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (reverse and remand portions of written order that did not reflect the trial court's oral pronouncements).
STONE and MAY, JJ., concur.