Case Name: William CUMMINS, Appellant, v. LAKE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-04-19
Citations: 671 So. 2d 893
Docket Number: No. 95-1738
Parties: William CUMMINS, Appellant, v. LAKE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, Appellee.
Judges: GOSHORN, GRIFFIN and ANTOON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 671
Pages: 893–893

Head Matter:
William CUMMINS, Appellant, v. LAKE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, Appellee.
No. 95-1738.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
April 19, 1996.
Frederick C. Morello, of Frederick C. Morello, P.A., Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
David V. Komreich and Jeffrey E. Mandel, of Muller, Mintz, Komreich, Caldwell, Casey, Crosland & Brammek, P.A., Orlando, for Ap-pellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Because we conclude that appellant's internal communications do not rise to the level necessary under Florida's Whistle Blower's Act, section 112.3187(5), Florida Statutes (Supp.1992), and that the Lake County personnel to whom appellant expressed his concerns are not within the scope of persons disclosure to whom is protected by section 112.3187(6), we affirm.
AFFIRMED.
GOSHORN, GRIFFIN and ANTOON, JJ., concur.
. It also appears that the claim may be time barred, as urged on appeal by appellee, but this was not an issue raised on motion for summary judgment and accordingly cannot be the basis for upholding the summary judgment.