Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Tina Alice RAY, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2011-12-13
Citations: 354 S.W.3d 256
Docket Number: No. ED 95393
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Tina Alice RAY, Appellant.
Judges: Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J. and ROBERT M. CLAYTON, III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 354
Pages: 256–257

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Tina Alice RAY, Appellant.
No. ED 95393.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Dec. 13, 2011.
Jo Ann Rotermund, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Robert J. (Jeff) Bartholomew, Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J. and ROBERT M. CLAYTON, III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Tina Ray appeals the judgment entered upon a trial court's verdict convicting her of one count of tampering with physical evidence, a class D felony. We find the trial court did not err in denying her motion for judgment of acquittal for insufficiency of the evidence.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).