Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Michael CHARLESTON, Appellant; Michael CHARLESTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1996-12-24
Citations: 936 S.W.2d 856
Docket Number: No. 69075
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Michael CHARLESTON, Appellant. Michael CHARLESTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANE, P.J., and GERALD M. SMITH and PUDLOWSKI, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 936
Pages: 856–856

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Michael CHARLESTON, Appellant. Michael CHARLESTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 69075.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Dec. 24, 1996.
Ellen H. Flottman, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, David R. Truman, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before CRANE, P.J., and GERALD M. SMITH and PUDLOWSKI, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of robbery in the second degree and resisting arrest. He also appeals from the denial of his post-conviction motion, Rule 29.15, without an evidentiary hearing. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion. The findings of fact made on the post-conviction motion are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears and there was evidence to support the verdict. The parties have been furnished with a statement of the reasons for our decision.
Judgments of conviction affirmed; judgment denying post-conviction motion affirmed. Rules 30.25(b), 84.16(b).