Case Name: Stanley Rosman, Respondent, v. James Clark, Doing Business as Clark Associates, et al., Defendants, and Card Key Systems, Inc., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1967-03-06
Citations: 27 A.D.2d 839
Docket Number: 
Parties: Stanley Rosman, Respondent, v. James Clark, Doing Business as Clark Associates, et al., Defendants, and Card Key Systems, Inc., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 27
Pages: 839–840

Head Matter:
Stanley Rosman, Respondent, v. James Clark, Doing Business as Clark Associates, et al., Defendants, and Card Key Systems, Inc., Appellant.

Opinion:
—• Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 9, 1966, reversed and motion granted, with $10 costs and disbursements. The method of service of process chosen by plaintiff is not authorized and is therefore invalid (CPLR 313, 311; Business Corporation Law, § 307, 306). It further appears that the facts, so far as they appear in this record, would not be sufficient basis for juris diction (Kramer v. Vogl, 17 N Y 2d 27; Feathers v. McLucas, 15 N Y 2d 443, 458, 464). TJghetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hopkins and Mnnder, JJ., concur.