Case Name: Glenn A. STEWART, Petitioner, v. RIVERSIDE TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED; Transportation Insurance; Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, Respondents
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-03-14
Citations: 680 F. App'x 232
Docket Number: No. 16-1891
Parties: Glenn A. STEWART, Petitioner, v. RIVERSIDE TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED; Transportation Insurance; Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, Respondents.
Judges: Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 680
Pages: 232–232

Head Matter:
Glenn A. STEWART, Petitioner, v. RIVERSIDE TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED; Transportation Insurance; Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, Respondents.
No. 16-1891
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: February 28, 2017
Decided: March 14, 2017
Andrew Hanley, Andrew Penny, CROSSLEY MCINTOSH COLLIER HANLEY & EDES, PLLC, Wilmington, North Carolina, for Petitioner. M. Patricia Smith, Solicitor of Labor, Maia S. Fisher, Associate Solicitor, Mark Reinhalter, Counsel for Longshore, Sean G. Bajkow-ski, Counsel for Appellate Litigation, Matthew W. Boyle, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Glenn A. Stewart .seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of longshore disability benefits pursuant to 33 U.S.C. § 901-950 (2012). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. Stewart v. Riverside Tech., Inc., No. 15-0436 (B.R.B. June 6, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED