Case Name: Steve Ray BUNCH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-01-13
Citations: 647 So. 2d 1080
Docket Number: No. 94-2461
Parties: Steve Ray BUNCH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: DAUKSCH, DIAMANTIS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 647
Pages: 1080–1080

Head Matter:
Steve Ray BUNCH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 94-2461.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Jan. 13, 1995.
Steve Ray Bunch, pro se.
No appearance for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. We affirm the summary denial of Bunch's 3.800(a) motion for post-conviction relief without prejudice. Although Bunch has demonstrated a prima facie case of improper consecutive habitual offender sentences under Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 278, 130 L.Ed.2d 195 (1994), the correct remedy to seek relief is a properly filed Rule 3.850 motion. See Callaway v. State, 642 So.2d 636 (Fla.2d DCA 1994); Borders v. State, 643 So.2d 110 (Fla.2d DCA 1994); Massey v. State, 648 So.2d 785 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).
DAUKSCH, DIAMANTIS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.