Case Name: JEAN SEVENAIR AND ALBERT SEVENAIR, PLAINTIFFS, v. GRASSELLI CHEMICAL COMPANY ET AL., DEFENDANTS
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1931-06-19
Citations: 9 N.J. Misc. 656
Docket Number: 
Parties: JEAN SEVENAIR AND ALBERT SEVENAIR, PLAINTIFFS, v. GRASSELLI CHEMICAL COMPANY ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 9
Pages: 656–656

Head Matter:
JEAN SEVENAIR AND ALBERT SEVENAIR, PLAINTIFFS, v. GRASSELLI CHEMICAL COMPANY ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
Submitted January 30, 1931
Decided June 19, 1931.
Before Justices Case, Daly and Donges.-
Por the rule, Heine & Laird.
Contra, Joseph H. Gaudiello.

Opinion:
Pee Cueiam.
This is defendants' rule to show cause why the verdicts should not be set aside as excessive. The plaintiff wife has a verdict for $11,000, and plaintiff husband has a verdict for $4,000.
We conclude that the verdict for the plaintiff wife, Jean Sevenair, is excessive.
If plaintiff Jean Sevenair will, within twenty days from the entry of an order hereunder, consent to a reduction of her verdict'to $9,000, the present rule will be discharged, otherwise the rule will be made absolute as to her, and a new trial granted as to damages only. The rule to show cause will be' discharged as to plaintiff Albert Sevenair.