Case Name: Mark A. KORTZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2013-06-25
Citations: 402 S.W.3d 157
Docket Number: No. WD 75060
Parties: Mark A. KORTZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Division Four: JAMES E. WELSH, Chief Judge, VICTOR C. HOWARD, Judge and MARK D. PFEIFFER, Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 402
Pages: 157–158

Head Matter:
Mark A. KORTZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 75060.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
June 25, 2013.
Amy M. Bartholow, Columbia, MO, for appellant:
Karen L. Kramer, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before Division Four: JAMES E. WELSH, Chief Judge, VICTOR C. HOWARD, Judge and MARK D. PFEIFFER, Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Mark Kortz appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. In his sole point on appeal, he claims that trial counsel was ineffective in failing to keep evidence of his uncharged crimes and bad acts from the jury. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memoran dum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).