Case Name: Mark JACKSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2008-08-19
Citations: 260 S.W.3d 431
Docket Number: No. ED 90000
Parties: Mark JACKSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Judge KURT S. ODENWALD, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J„ and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 260
Pages: 431–432

Head Matter:
Mark JACKSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 90000.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Aug. 19, 2008.
Gwenda R. Robinson, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Roger W. Johnson, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before Judge KURT S. ODENWALD, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J„ and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Mark Jackson, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to inform him of the state's plea offer.
The motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).