Case Name: The State of Ohio, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. Stall, Appellee and Cross-Appellant, et al., Cross-Appellants
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2011-04-27
Citations: 128 Ohio St. 3d 501
Docket Number: No. 2010-2264
Parties: The State of Ohio, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. Stall, Appellee and Cross-Appellant, et al., Cross-Appellants.
Judges: O’Connor, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 128
Pages: 501–501

Head Matter:
The State of Ohio, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. Stall, Appellee and Cross-Appellant, et al., Cross-Appellants.
[Cite as State v. Stall, 128 Ohio St.3d 501, 2011-Ohio-1960.]
(No. 2010-2264
Submitted April 5, 2011
Decided April 27, 2011.)
Stanley Flegm, Crawford County Prosecuting Attorney, and Clifford J. Murphy, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant and cross-appellee.
Starkey & Stoll, Ltd., and Geoffrey L. Stoll, for appellee and cross-appellants.

Opinion:
{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.
{¶ 2} The discretionary cross-appeal is not accepted.
{¶ 3} The portion of the judgment of the court of appeals addressing cross-appellants' assignment of error below is vacated as to appellee and cross-appellant Stall only on the authority of State v. Johnson, 128 Ohio St.3d 153, 2010-Ohio-6314, 942 N.E.2d 1061, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of our decision in State v. Johnson.
O'Connor, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O'Donnell, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.
Pfeifer and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent and would not accept the discretionary appeal.