Case Name: SEROWITZ, Respondent, v. ZWEIFACH et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1906-06-01
Citations: 99 N.Y.S. 1149
Docket Number: 
Parties: SEROWITZ, Respondent, v. ZWEIFACH et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 99
Pages: 1149–1149

Head Matter:
SEROWITZ, Respondent, v. ZWEIFACH et al., Appellants.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
June 1, 1906.)
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan; First District. Action by Zimon Serowitz against Adolf Zweifach and another. From a Municipal Court judgment in favor of plaintiff, and from an order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial, they appeal.
Affirmed.
J. Wilkenfeld, for appellants.
E. A. Klein, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The case was tried by the justice without a jury. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff and against the defendants upon conflicting evidence, and the questions of fact were decided in favor of the plaintiff. The claim that the justice presiding at the trial was disqualified is without merit. The judgment and order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.