Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Terry Mead Jr., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2008-07-24
Citations: 53 A.D.3d 927
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Terry Mead Jr., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 53
Pages: 927–928

Head Matter:
(July 24, 2008)
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Terry Mead Jr., Appellant.
[861 NYS2d 540]

Opinion:
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Washington County (Berke, J.), rendered March 21, 2006, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sexual act in the third degree.
In satisfaction of a three-count indictment, as well as several unrelated pending charges, defendant pleaded guilty to criminal sexual act in the third degree. County Court thereafter sentenced defendant in accordance with the plea agreement as a second felony offender to IV2 to 3 years in prison. Defendant now appeals, solely challenging the sentence imposed.
Initially, we reject defendant's contention that the prison sentence imposed was harsh and excessive. Given the seriousness of the crime to which defendant pleaded guilty, along with his extensive criminal history, we cannot conclude that County Court abused its discretion, nor does the record reveal any extraordinary circumstances warranting a reduction of the sentence in the interest of justice (see People v Smith, 43 AD3d 493, 493 [2007]). We similarly find no merit to defendant's assertion that his sentence constituted cruel and unusual punishment (see People v Mitchell, 289 AD2d 776, 779 [2001], lv denied 98 NY2d 653 [2002]; see also People v Gilliam, 36 AD3d 1151, 1153 [2007], lv denied 8 NY3d 946 [2007]). Lastly, to the extent that defendant claims that he was not afforded credit for time served, such a challenge is properly advanced in a CPLR article 78 proceeding (see People v Bretti, 179 AD2d 996, 997-998 [1992], lv denied 79 NY2d 998 [1992]; People v Majercik, 104 AD2d 707 [1984]).
Peters, J.P., Spain, Lahtinen, Kavanagh and Stein, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.