Case Name: Daniel ECKHART, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-01-08
Citations: 670 So. 2d 977
Docket Number: No. 95-1381
Parties: Daniel ECKHART, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: BOOTH, JOANOS and BENTON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 670
Pages: 977–977

Head Matter:
Daniel ECKHART, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 95-1381.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jan. 8, 1996.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; James W. Rogers, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
After careful review of the record in this Anders appeal from a plea of nolo contende-re, having found nothing that would arguably constitute reversible error, we affirm the conviction and sentence for violation of probation. We remand, however, to the trial court for entry of a written order of violation of probation, because none appears in the record. See Wood v. State, 653 So.2d 493 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Wiggers v. State, 652 So.2d 1294 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Benton v. State, 652 So.2d 1288 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).
BOOTH, JOANOS and BENTON, JJ., concur.