Case Name: Benjamin Tenenbaum, Appellant, v. Zeidle Maud, Doing Business as Maud's Summer-Ray, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1948-05-17
Citations: 273 A.D. 1025
Docket Number: 
Parties: Benjamin Tenenbaum, Appellant, v. Zeidle Maud, Doing Business as Maud’s Summer-Ray, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 273
Pages: 1025–1025

Head Matter:
Benjamin Tenenbaum, Appellant, v. Zeidle Maud, Doing Business as Maud’s Summer-Ray, Respondent.

Opinion:
Action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff, who was injured while playing a game of handball at defendant's hotel. The complaint was dismissed at the close of the plaintiff's case. Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. In our opinion, the evidence presented questions of fact for consideration by a jury. Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.