Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joseph L. Marks, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1990-11-16
Citations: 167 A.D.2d 974
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph L. Marks, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 167
Pages: 974–974

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph L. Marks, Appellant.

Opinion:
Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted. Memorandum: The People concede that reversal is required because the deliberating jury was not "continuously kept together under the supervision of a court officer" (CPL 310.10; People v Coons, 75 NY2d 796). Failure to sequester the jury during deliberations is an error which " 'affect[s] the organization of the court or the mode of proceedings prescribed by law' " (People v Ahmed, 66 NY2d 307, 310, quoting People v Patterson, 39 NY2d 288, 295, affd 432 US 197). Although the parties agreed to let the jurors go home for the evening, failure to sequester the jury during deliberations is a fundamental error depriving defendant of a fair trial. "[T]he right protected by CPL 310.10 is of such fundamental importance that defendant can neither waive it nor consent to waive it, violation of such right is per se reversible" (People v Dasher, 161 AD2d 1207, 1208). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Kubiniec, J.— assault, second degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Pine and Lawton, JJ.