Case Name: PARTRIDGE v. McKINNEY et als.
Court: Supreme Court of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1859
Citations: 13 Cal. 158
Docket Number: 
Parties: PARTRIDGE v. McKINNEY et als.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Reports
Volume: 13
Pages: 158–159

Head Matter:
PARTRIDGE v. McKINNEY et als.
The question as to the necessity of recording mining claims reserved.
Appeal from the Ninth District.
This case is reported in 12 Cal.

Opinion:
On a rehearing, the following opinion was delivered by Baldwin, J
Terry, C. J. concurring:
In this ease a rehearing was granted.' An opinion was rendered by Mr. Justice Burnett, and concurred in. We think, on a re-examination, that this opinion is correct on the proposition before the Court; but that it is not necessary to express any opinion as to the necessity of recording mining claims. That question is reserved. With this qualification, we adopt that opinion, and the result of it, as the judgment of the Court.
Ordered accordingly.