Case Name: Brandon Hamilton GREEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lindy PENDERGRASS; John Sellew; Sgt. Tommy Crawford; Officer Keith Foster, Defendants-Appellees, and John Foster, Jailor, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-08-02
Citations: 667 F. App'x 801
Docket Number: No. 16-6441
Parties: Brandon Hamilton GREEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lindy PENDERGRASS; John Sellew; Sgt. Tommy Crawford; Officer Keith Foster, Defendants-Appellees, and John Foster, Jailor, Defendant.
Judges: Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 667
Pages: 801–802

Head Matter:
Brandon Hamilton GREEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lindy PENDERGRASS; John Sellew; Sgt. Tommy Crawford; Officer Keith Foster, Defendants-Appellees, and John Foster, Jailor, Defendant.
No. 16-6441
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 28, 2016
Decided: August 2, 2016
Brandon Hamilton Green, Appellant Pro Se. Sonny Sade Haynes, WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appel-lee.
Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Brandon Hamilton Green appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to the Defendants on Green's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. On appeal, we confíne our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Green's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, Green has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc,, 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED