Case Name: H. McIntosh Sadler et al., Respondents, v. The Boston and Bolivia Rubber Company, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1911-05-09
Citations: 202 N.Y. 547
Docket Number: 
Parties: H. McIntosh Sadler et al., Respondents, v. The Boston and Bolivia Rubber Company, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 202
Pages: 547–548

Head Matter:
H. McIntosh Sadler et al., Respondents, v. The Boston and Bolivia Rubber Company, Appellant.
Sadler v. Boston & Bolivia Rubber Co., 140 App. Div. 367, affirmed.
(Submitted April 24, 1911;
decided May 9, 1911.)
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 4, 1910, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion to set aside and declare null and void the service of a summons.
The following question was certified: “Upon the facts appearing upon this application, did the Supreme Court of this State acquire jurisdiction of the Boston and Bolivia Rubber Company? ”
John W. Griggs for appellant.
Charles H. Tuttle for respondents.

Opinion:
Order affirmed, with costs; question certified answered in the affirmative; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Cray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Hiscock and Collin, JJ.