Case Name: Preston PAMPHILE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2018-12-31
Citations: 260 So. 3d 1185
Docket Number: No. 1D18-3281
Parties: Preston PAMPHILE, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 260
Pages: 1185–1186

Head Matter:
Preston PAMPHILE, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 1D18-3281
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
December 31, 2018
Preston Pamphile, pro se, Petitioner.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Samuel B. Steinberg and Jason W. Rodriguez, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This timely sworn petition seeks belated appeal of a September 18, 2017, order declaring Petitioner competent to proceed nunc pro tunc to the time of trial. We dismiss the petition because of a jurisdictional issue.
After a jury trial, Petitioner was found guilty and judgments and sentences were rendered on December 2, 2014, in Leon County Circuit Court case number 2014-CF-1428. In 2016, Petitioner filed a petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel raising four grounds. The petition was granted in part, the judgments and sentences were reversed, and the cause was remanded for further proceedings on the question of establishing Petitioner's competency at the time of trial. See Pamphile v. State , 216 So.3d 765 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017). On remand, the circuit court issued a nunc pro tunc order on the competency issue, but did not re-enter the judgments and sentences. An order on competency is not independently reviewable under rule 9.140(b), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Because no appealable order has been rendered by the circuit court, the petition for belated appeal is dismissed.
Lewis, Winokur, and Jay, JJ., concur.