Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Robert Young, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1995-09-19
Citations: 86 N.Y.2d 816
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Young, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 86
Pages: 816–817

Head Matter:
[658 NE2d 209, 634 NYS2d 432]
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Young, Appellant.
Decided September 19, 1995
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson, New York City (Anthony S. Yoo of counsel), Mark Gimpel and E. Joshua Rosenkranz for appellant.
Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney of New York County, New York City (Robert M. Raciti of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed. Defendant failed to preserve for this Court's review his argument based upon People v Bleakley (69 NY2d 490). Defendant's remaining arguments are without merit.
Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick.