Case Name: James Blake RAMSEY, aka Blake Ramsey, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Teresa SLOAN-KENTNER; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-10-13
Citations: 334 F. App'x 107
Docket Number: No. 08-56169
Parties: James Blake RAMSEY, aka Blake Ramsey, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Teresa SLOAN-KENTNER; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before: SILVERMAN, RAWLINSON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 334
Pages: 107–107

Head Matter:
James Blake RAMSEY, aka Blake Ramsey, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Teresa SLOAN-KENTNER; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
No. 08-56169.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 14, 2009.
Filed Oct. 13, 2009.
James Blake Ramsey, Beaumont, CA, pro se.
Paul F. Arentz, Esquire, Pamela J. Holmes, Joel A. Davis, Office of the California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: SILVERMAN, RAWLINSON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
James Blake Ramsey appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional violations and fraud in connection with an unlawful de-tainer proceeding. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Rhoades v. Avon Prods., Inc., 504 F.3d 1151, 1156 (9th Cir.2007), and we affirm.
Ramsey does not raise any contentions concerning the grounds for dismissal, and we thus deem any such challenge abandoned. See Cook v. Schriro, 538 F.3d 1000, 1014 n. 5 (9th Cir.2008), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 1033, 173 L.Ed.2d 301 (2009). Ramsey's procedural challenges are unavailing.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.