Case Name: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Miller
Court: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1934-02-01
Citations: 111 Pa. Super. 459
Docket Number: Appeal No. 358
Parties: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Miller.
Judges: Before Trexler, P. J., Keller, Cunningham, Baldrige, Stadtfeud, Parker and James, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania Superior Court Reports
Volume: 111
Pages: 459–461

Head Matter:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Miller.
Argued October 16, 1933.
Before Trexler, P. J., Keller, Cunningham, Baldrige, Stadtfeud, Parker and James, JJ.
Frankliy, E. Barr, Assistant District Attorney, and with him Charles F. Kelley, District Attorney, for appellant.
G. Von Phul Jones, for appellee.
February 1, 1934:

Opinion:
Opinion by
James, J.,
The defendant was indicted on September 20, 1932 for having on the 22nd day of September, 1928 • and the 28th day of September, 1928- aided and abetted one Alexander D. Robinson, vice-president and treasurer of the Northwestern Trust Company, in the embezzlement, abstraction and wilful misapplication of certain funds of the Northwestern Trust Company. Defendant was not an officer, director, receiver, superintendent, manager, broker, attorney, agent, employee, or member of said banking institution. Defendant moved to quash and the motion was sustained, from which order an appeal was taken by the Commonwealth.
The, same question raised in this appeal is involved in the appeal of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Appellant, v. Russell H. Foster, No. 356, October Term, 1933, 111 Pa. Superior Ct. 451, in which an opinion has this day been filed sustaining the action of the court below in quashing the indictment. For the reasons therein set forth the judgment is affirmed.