Case Name: Rolando OTERO a/k/a Rolando Hernandez and Rolando Otero Hernandez, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-07-25
Citations: 546 So. 2d 795
Docket Number: No. 89-242
Parties: Rolando OTERO a/k/a Rolando Hernandez and Rolando Otero Hernandez, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and NESBITT, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 546
Pages: 795–795

Head Matter:
Rolando OTERO a/k/a Rolando Hernandez and Rolando Otero Hernandez, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 89-242.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 25, 1989.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Harvey J. Sepler, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Gary L. Printy, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.
Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and NESBITT, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a denial of a Writ of Habeas Corpus. The crucial point is whether the trial judge ever mitigated the appellant's sentence. Nothing in the record before the trial court at the time of the order under review ever indicated such and the trial court was correct in denial of relief, and therefore no error has been made to appear. However, between the filing of the notice of appeal and the disposition of this matter, it appears that events have taken place in the original trial proceedings which may now warrant relief to the appellant. Therefore, the order under review is affirmed without prejudice to the appellant, as petitioner, reapplying for ha-beas corpus relief in the trial court.