Case Name: Darrell BOYE, Kirk Snyder, Larry Etsitty, Jr., Sarah Habaadih, Jones R. Begay, Johnny Peshlakia, Ronald Platerio, Rex Butler, Tryone Benally, Chalene Bahe, Kenny James, Rosalyn Benally, Leroy Butler, Lucy Lane, Dale Dennison, Randell Tomasyo, Marjorie Henderson, Patricia Yellowhair, Clinton Curtis, Henry K. Moore, Irene Six, Thomas Esitty, Genevieve Morgan, Darrell Harvey, and Leland Tom, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-08-24
Citations: 391 F. App'x 881
Docket Number: No. 2010-5043
Parties: Darrell BOYE, Kirk Snyder, Larry Etsitty, Jr., Sarah Habaadih, Jones R. Begay, Johnny Peshlakia, Ronald Platerio, Rex Butler, Tryone Benally, Chalene Bahe, Kenny James, Rosalyn Benally, Leroy Butler, Lucy Lane, Dale Dennison, Randell Tomasyo, Marjorie Henderson, Patricia Yellowhair, Clinton Curtis, Henry K. Moore, Irene Six, Thomas Esitty, Genevieve Morgan, Darrell Harvey, and Leland Tom, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Claims Reporter
Volume: 95
Pages: 881–881

Head Matter:
Darrell BOYE, Kirk Snyder, Larry Etsitty, Jr., Sarah Habaadih, Jones R. Begay, Johnny Peshlakia, Ronald Platerio, Rex Butler, Tryone Benally, Chalene Bahe, Kenny James, Rosalyn Benally, Leroy Butler, Lucy Lane, Dale Dennison, Randell Tomasyo, Marjorie Henderson, Patricia Yellowhair, Clinton Curtis, Henry K. Moore, Irene Six, Thomas Esitty, Genevieve Morgan, Darrell Harvey, and Leland Tom, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 2010-5043.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Aug. 24, 2010.
Edward D. Fitzhugh, Tamra Facciola, Law Office of Edward D. Fitzhugh, Tempe, AZ, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
Christopher A. Bowen, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee.

Opinion:
ON MOTION
ORDER
Darrell Boye, et al. move for a 35-day extension of time, until September 7, 2010, to file their reply brief. Boye, et al. states that the United States has no objection.
Accordingly,
It Is Ordered That:
The motion is granted.