Case Name: Dharmesh Vinodrai MEHTA; Renu Dharmesh Mehta, Debtors-Appellants, v. Sanjiv D. SHAH; Kamini S. Shah, Creditors-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-03-09
Citations: 596 F. App'x 245
Docket Number: No. 14-1929
Parties: Dharmesh Vinodrai MEHTA; Renu Dharmesh Mehta, Debtors-Appellants, v. Sanjiv D. SHAH; Kamini S. Shah, Creditors-Appellees.
Judges: Before. KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 596
Pages: 245–246

Head Matter:
Dharmesh Vinodrai MEHTA; Renu Dharmesh Mehta, Debtors-Appellants, v. Sanjiv D. SHAH; Kamini S. Shah, Creditors-Appellees.
No. 14-1929.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 27, 2015.
Decided: March 9, 2015.
Dharmesh Vinodrai Mehta, Renu Dhar-mesh Mehta, Appellants Pro Se. Marc Allan Busman, Busman & Busman, PC, Fair-fax Station, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before. KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Dharmesh Vinodrai Mehta and Renu Dharmesh Mehta appeal the district court's order affirming the bankruptcy court's order denying a discharge in their underlying Chapter 7 proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the courts below. Mehta v. Shah, No. l:14-cv-00025-AJT-TCB (E.D.Va. Aug. 15, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.