Case Name: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. DREXEL ENTERPRISES, INC., Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1971-04-15
Citations: 439 F.2d 156
Docket Number: No. 15089
Parties: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. DREXEL ENTERPRISES, INC., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 439
Pages: 156–156

Head Matter:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. DREXEL ENTERPRISES, INC., Respondent.
No. 15089.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Argued April 6, 1971.
Decided April 15, 1971.
Ronald I. Tish, Atty., N. L. R. B. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel and William Wachter, Washington, D. C., Attorney, on the brief), for petitioner.
R. D. Douglas, Jr., Greensboro, N. C. (Douglas, Ravenel, Hardy & Crihfield, Greensboro, N. C., on the brief), for respondent.
Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and WINTER and BUTZNER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Upon consideration of the record, briefs, and oral argument, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the Board's finding that the company violated § 8(a) (3) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act. We enforce the Board's order, which is reported at 180 NLRB No. 46.