Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Paul NAGY, Defendant - Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-03-31
Citations: 124 F. App'x 217
Docket Number: No. 04-7698
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Paul NAGY, Defendant — Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 124
Pages: 217–217

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Paul NAGY, Defendant — Appellant.
No. 04-7698.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 11, 2005.
Decided: March 31, 2005.
George Alan DuBois, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant.
Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Paul Nagy appeals the district court's order denying Nagy's motions for recusal of the district judge, disqualification of the Federal Public Defender's Office, and expedited consideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Nagy, No. CA-98-951-5-BR (E.D.N.C. filed Sept. 1, 2004; entered Sept. 2, 2004). We deny as moot Nagy's motion to expedite consideration of this appeal, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. The motion to strike Appellee's informal brief is denied.
AFFIRMED