Case Name: JAY BAR DAN CORPORATION, a corporation, and Jacob Hockstein, Appellants, v. MARAN WASHING, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1973-05-08
Citations: 277 So. 2d 811
Docket Number: Nos. 72-951, 72-1276
Parties: JAY BAR DAN CORPORATION, a corporation, and Jacob Hockstein, Appellants, v. MARAN WASHING, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellees.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and CHARLES CARROLL, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 277
Pages: 811–812

Head Matter:
JAY BAR DAN CORPORATION, a corporation, and Jacob Hockstein, Appellants, v. MARAN WASHING, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellees.
Nos. 72-951, 72-1276.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 8, 1973.
Rehearing Denied June 11, 1973.
Wilson, Bums & Browd, Miami, for appellants.
Greenberg, Traurig, Hoffman, Lipoff & Quentel, Sidney Shapiro, Miami, for appel-lees.
Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and CHARLES CARROLL, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
These consolidated appeals are from a final judgment of foreclosure. The basic question presented is whether or not the evidence supported the court's finding that the mortgage was in default at the time of a declaration of intent to accelerate the remaining payments. We have reviewed the evidence and find that if the court had made such a finding it would have been fully supported by the evidence. See Campbell v. Werner, Fla.App.1970, 232 So.2d 252. However, this question does not determine the outcome of this cause inasmuch as the record shows that appellant was, by order of court and without objection by the appellee-plaintiff, afforded an opportunity to bring his payments to date prior to the entry of a judgment for the accelerated amount.
We have examined the record in the light of the other points presented and find that they do not present error.
Affirmed.