Case Name: NATHAN McMINN v. S. W. HAMILTON, Administrator
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 1877-06
Citations: 77 N.C. 300
Docket Number: 
Parties: NATHAN McMINN v. S. W. HAMILTON, Administrator.
Judges: 
Reporter: North Carolina Reports
Volume: 77
Pages: 300–301

Head Matter:
NATHAN McMINN v. S. W. HAMILTON, Administrator.
Jurisdiction — Venue—Pleading.
If a Court has jurisdiction of the subject matter of an action and the venue is wrong, the objection must he taken in apt time. If the defendant pleads to the merits of the action, he will be deemed to have waited the objection.
Appeal from an Order dismissing the Action, made at Spring Term, 1877, of Transylvania Superior Court, by Henry, J.
Erom the 'case agreed and the record, the following facts appear: The plaintiff brought an action against the defendant in his representative character for $70.35 before a Justice of the Peace in said County where both parties reside. The defendant obtained letters of administration and filed his official bond in Henderson County. The defendant appeared before the Justice and pleaded payment and statute of limitations. Evidence was heard and judgment was rendered for the plaintiff, from, which the' defendant appealed. In the Superior Court he filed a demurrer, not to the jurisdiction, but on other grounds ; and made a motion at the same term to dismiss the action for want of jurisdiction. The plaintiff declined to remove the case by consent and His Honor dismissed the action. Erom which order the plaintiff appealed.
Mr. J. S. Merrimon, for plaintiff.
Mr. A. W. Say wood, for defendant.

Opinion:
Eairoloth, J.
(After stating the facts as above.) Where a Court has no jurisdiction of the subject matter, the objection can be taken at any time, and indeed as soon as thi$ fact is discovered, the Court mero motu will take notice of it and dismiss the action. But if it has jurisdiction of the subject matter and the venue is wrong, the objection must be taken in apt time ; and if the defendant pleads to the merits of the action, he will be taken to have waived the objection. He cannot have two chances.
Applying this principle to the case before us, we think the defendant waived the objection by pleading before the Justice and that it was then too late to raise it.
Error.
PER, CURIAM. Judgment reversed.