Case Name: Robert T. BROWN, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2011-09-20
Citations: 348 S.W.3d 828
Docket Number: No. ED 96147
Parties: Robert T. BROWN, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 348
Pages: 828–828

Head Matter:
Robert T. BROWN, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION, Defendant/Respondent.
No. ED 96147.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Sept. 20, 2011.
Joseph A. Fenlon, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Roster, Attorney General, Justin Mettlen, Assistant Attorney General, Kansas City, MO, for Respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Robert T. Brown (Father) appeals from the judgment affirming the Decision and Order of the Department of Social Services, Family Support Division (Division), denying his claim for attorney's fees based on a finding that the Division was substantially justified in issuing an income withholding order and in making its determination of past due child support. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value or serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).