Case Name: Robin Weintraub, Appellant, v. Grey Direct, Inc., Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2007-04-24
Citations: 39 A.D.3d 400
Docket Number: 
Parties: Robin Weintraub, Appellant, v Grey Direct, Inc., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 39
Pages: 400–400

Head Matter:
Robin Weintraub, Appellant, v Grey Direct, Inc., Respondent.
[832 NYS2d 803]

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Faviola A. Soto, J.), entered March 6, 2006, which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Summary judgment was properly granted based upon the clear and unambiguous agreement pursuant to which plaintiff was employed by defendant (see W.W.W. Assoc. v Giancontieri, 77 NY2d 157, 162 [1990]). Contrary to plaintiff's claims, the agreement did not preclude her reassignment and her reassignment did not constitute a constructive discharge.
We have considered plaintiffs remaining arguments and find them without merit. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Marlow, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.