Case Name: Wayne E. GILLESPIE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2016-05-17
Citations: 504 S.W.3d 68
Docket Number: No. ED 102999
Parties: Wayne E. GILLESPIE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before: Philip M. Hess, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 504
Pages: 68–68

Head Matter:
Wayne E. GILLESPIE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 102999
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Filed: May 17, 2016
FOR APPELLANT: Margaret M. Johnston, Missouri Public Defender’s Office, Woodrail Centre, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7 Suite 100, Columbia, Missouri 65203.
FOR RESPONDENT: Rachel S. Planter, Assistant Attorney General, PO Box 899, Jefferson' City, Missouri 65102.
Before: Philip M. Hess, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Wayne E. Gillespie appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court's denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2015).