Case Name: Armando Leos GONZALEZ; et al., Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-07-03
Citations: 188 F. App'x 585
Docket Number: No. 06-70285
Parties: Armando Leos GONZALEZ; et al., Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 188
Pages: 585–586

Head Matter:
Armando Leos GONZALEZ; et al., Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 06-70285.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
July 3, 2006.
Armando Leos Gonzalez, Riverside, CA, pro se.
Eva Angelica Castillo Montenegro, Riverside, CA, pro se.
Estephanie Leos Castillo, Riverside, CA, pro se.
CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Cindy S. Ferrier, Esq., Jennifer L. Light-body, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Agency Nos. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ], [ AXX-XXX-XXX ], [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].
Before: PREGERSON, TALLMAN and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Respondent's motion to dismiss this petition for review for lack of jurisdiction is granted with respect to petitioners Armando Leos Gonzalez and Eva Angelica Castillo Montenegro. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir.2003); Montero-Martinez v. Ashcroft, 277 F.3d 1137, 1144 (9th Cir.2002).
Respondent's motion to dismiss this petition for review for lack of jurisdiction is granted with respect to petitioner Estephanie Leos Castillo because she was granted the only relief she sought. See Am. Rivers v. Nat'l Marine Fisheries Serv., 126 F.3d 1118, 1123 (9th Cir.1997).
The temporary stay of removal and voluntary departure confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) and Desta v. Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004), shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.
All other pending motions are denied as moot.
DISMISSED.