Case Name: In the Matter of the Dissolution of the Marriage of CLARK, Respondent, and CLARK, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1976-02-03
Citations: 24 Or. App. 297
Docket Number: No. 79300, CA 5071
Parties: In the Matter of the Dissolution of the Marriage of CLARK, Respondent, and CLARK, Appellant.
Judges: Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Langtry and Thornton, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 24
Pages: 297–299

Head Matter:
Argued January 19,
affirmed February 3,
reconsideration denied February 25, petition for review denied March 31, 1976
In the Matter of the Dissolution of the Marriage of CLARK, Respondent, and CLARK, Appellant.
(No. 79300, CA 5071)
544 P2d 1066
George N. Gross, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Brown, Burt & Swanson, Salem.
Sam F. Speerstra, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Rhoten, Rho-ten & Speerstra, Salem.
Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Langtry and Thornton, Judges.
PER CURIAM.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to modify so much of a decree of a dissolution of marriage as pertains to the support appellant is required to pay to his former wife. We agree with the trial judge that the evidence does not disclose such change of circumstance as would justify a modification. Rowley v. Rowley, 232 Or 285, 375 P2d 84 (1962); Brown v. Brown, 1 Or App 543, 464 P2d 706 (1970).
Affirmed. No costs to either party.