Case Name: Wilfredo Gonzalez LORA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Thomas M. HOLLENHORST, Assistant United States Attorney, personal and official capacity; William Fitzpatrick, Special Assistant United States Attorney, official and personal capacity; Eugene Rossi, Special Assistant United States Attorney; Timothy McGrath, Special Agent for the Drug Enforcement Administration, official and personal capacity, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-09-01
Citations: 108 F. App'x 101
Docket Number: No. 04-1184
Parties: Wilfredo Gonzalez LORA, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Thomas M. HOLLENHORST, Assistant United States Attorney, personal and official capacity; William Fitzpatrick, Special Assistant United States Attorney, official and personal capacity; Eugene Rossi, Special Assistant United States Attorney; Timothy McGrath, Special Agent for the Drug Enforcement Administration, official and personal capacity, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before WIDENER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 108
Pages: 101–101

Head Matter:
Wilfredo Gonzalez LORA, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Thomas M. HOLLENHORST, Assistant United States Attorney, personal and official capacity; William Fitzpatrick, Special Assistant United States Attorney, official and personal capacity; Eugene Rossi, Special Assistant United States Attorney; Timothy McGrath, Special Agent for the Drug Enforcement Administration, official and personal capacity, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 04-1184.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 26, 2004.
Decided Sept. 1, 2004.
Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora, Appellant pro se. Leslie Bonner McClendon, Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before WIDENER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora appeals the district court's orders dismissing his breach of contract action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), and denying his motion filed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Lora v. Hollenhorst, No. CA-03-449-AM (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 28, 2003 & entered Oct. 29, 2003; filed Nov. 17, 2003 & entered Nov. 18, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED