Case Name: FRANKLIN BANK vs. NOLTE & AL.
Court: Louisiana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1826-06
Citations: 4 Mart. (n.s.) 624
Docket Number: 
Parties: FRANKLIN BANK vs. NOLTE & AL.
Judges: 
Reporter: Martin (Louisiana Term Reports)
Volume: 4
Pages: 624–625

Head Matter:
FRANKLIN BANK vs. NOLTE & AL.
Appeal from the court of the first district.
if a credit sues an insol-vemdebtor,who has not put him on hb hilan, the case will be cu-rauHted with the proceedings oftht other ere-ditors.

Opinion:
Porter, J.,
delivered the opinion of the 1 court. The defendants have lately become ^ insolvent, and have made a cession of their goods | syndics have been appointed, and the ° J 1 1 COHCUTSO is HOW pending.
They are sued on the ground that the plaintiffs were not put on the bilan, arid are not bound by the proceedings.
The judge a quo decided that, as the suit of the defendants against their creditors was still pending, this cause should be cumulated with the proceedings in that case.
We think be decided correctly : the opinion of this court, to the same effect, was pronounced a few days since in the case of Taylor vs. Hollander. Ante, 535.
M1-Caleb for the plaintiffs, Eustis for the defendants.
It is therefore ordered, adjudged arid decreed, that the judgment of the district court be affirmed, with costs.