Case Name: BLISS v. SMITH
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1926
Citations: 6 Ohio Law Abs. 28
Docket Number: 
Parties: BLISS v. SMITH.
Judges: Shields and Sayre of the 4th Dist., sitting.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 6
Pages: 28–28

Head Matter:
BLISS v. SMITH.
Ohio Appeals, 5th Dist., Muskingum Co.
Shields and Sayre of the 4th Dist., sitting.
George & Leasure, Zanesville, for Bliss.
L. F. Sater, Columbus, for Smith.

Opinion:
HOUCK, J.
1. Where plaintiff took judgment on a cog-novit note, defendant by filing motion to set aside judgment in trial court, entered appearance.
2. Where plaintiff took judgment on cog-novit note, court was authorized to vacate and suspend judgment and give defendant opportunity to tender answer and file same, if it contained defense in law, and have case heard on merits.
(Shields and Sayre, JJ., concur.)
For reference to full opinion, see Omnibus Index, last page, this issue.