Case Name: Simon F. O'Connell, Respondent, v. Marion E. Moniz and Raymond T. Moniz, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1930-10
Citations: 230 A.D. 862
Docket Number: 
Parties: Simon F. O’Connell, Respondent, v. Marion E. Moniz and Raymond T. Moniz, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 230
Pages: 862–862

Head Matter:
Simon F. O’Connell, Respondent, v. Marion E. Moniz and Raymond T. Moniz, Appellants.

Opinion:
Order and judgment reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. In our opinion, the counterclaim in the defendants' answer sets up a good cause of action for fraud and deceit which is supported by the opposing affidavits, and issues of fact are presented which entitle defendants to a trial. Young, Kapper, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.