Case Name: Mark CORRIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Malcolm J. HOWARD; Thomas P. Swain; Anne Hayes; David W. Daniel; Ken MacKenzie, MacKenzie, Incorporated, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-07-31
Citations: 235 F. App'x 95
Docket Number: No. 07-6660
Parties: Mark CORRIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Malcolm J. HOWARD; Thomas P. Swain; Anne Hayes; David W. Daniel; Ken MacKenzie, MacKenzie, Incorporated, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 235
Pages: 95–95

Head Matter:
Mark CORRIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Malcolm J. HOWARD; Thomas P. Swain; Anne Hayes; David W. Daniel; Ken MacKenzie, MacKenzie, Incorporated, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 07-6660.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 24, 2007.
Decided: July 31, 2007.
Mark Corrigan, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Mark Corrigan appeals the district court's order dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000) his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Corrigan v. Howard, No. 5:07-CT3023-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 10, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.