Case Name: Alexander Ross, Appellant, v. Julius Blum, Trading under the Firm Name, etc., Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1925-11
Citations: 215 A.D. 721
Docket Number: 
Parties: Alexander Ross, Appellant, v. Julius Blum, Trading under the Firm Name, etc., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 215
Pages: 721–721

Head Matter:
Alexander Ross, Appellant, v. Julius Blum, Trading under the Firm Name, etc., Respondent.

Opinion:
Order directing plaintiff to serve further amended complaint reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. We think that the amended complaint sufficiently alleges a single contract of employment, and that plaintiff should not, therefore, be required to split up his claim into several distinct and separate causes of action. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Manning, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.