Case Name: Raymond J. HOGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TEXTRON FLEX ALLOY, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-09-27
Citations: 143 F. App'x 556
Docket Number: No. 05-1350
Parties: Raymond J. HOGAN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. TEXTRON FLEX ALLOY, INCORPORATED, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 143
Pages: 556–556

Head Matter:
Raymond J. HOGAN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. TEXTRON FLEX ALLOY, INCORPORATED, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 05-1350.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 31, 2005.
Decided: Sept. 27, 2005.
Raymond J. Hogan, Appellant pro se. Kenneth Paul Carlson, Jr., Kristine Marie Howard, Constangy, Brooks & Smith, L.L.C., Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Raymond J. Hogan appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to Defendant in this action alleging discrimination in employment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hogan v. Textron Flex Alloy, No. CA-03-194-3 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 3, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED