Case Name: McELIGOT & CHENOWETH COMPANY ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. THE TOWN OF NUTLEY, IN THE COUNTY OF ESSEX, RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1919-03-03
Citations: 92 N.J.L. 636
Docket Number: 
Parties: McELIGOT & CHENOWETH COMPANY ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. THE TOWN OF NUTLEY, IN THE COUNTY OF ESSEX, RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 92
Pages: 636–637

Head Matter:
McELIGOT & CHENOWETH COMPANY ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. THE TOWN OF NUTLEY, IN THE COUNTY OF ESSEX, RESPONDENT.
Argued November 29, 1918
Decided March 3, 1919.
On appeal from the Supreme Court,, whose opinion is reported in 92 N. J. L. 120.
For the appellants, Reed & Reynolds.
For the respondent, J. Harry Hull.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
] The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Kalisch in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief .Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, JJ. 8.
For reversal — Minturn, White, JJ. 2.