Case Name: WATSON, Appellant, v. WILLAMETTE SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, Respondent
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1978-09-12
Citations: 283 Or. 483
Docket Number: No. 421-621, SC 25149
Parties: WATSON, Appellant, v. WILLAMETTE SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, Respondent.
Judges: Before Denecke, Chief Justice, and Tongue, Bryson, and Linde, Justices.
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 283
Pages: 483–485

Head Matter:
Argued April 6,
affirmed September 12,
petition for rehearing denied October 3, 1978
WATSON, Appellant, v. WILLAMETTE SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, Respondent.
(No. 421-621, SC 25149)
583 P2d 1141
Alton J. Bassett, Sr., Portland, argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant.
William R. Miller, Jr., of Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Jones, Lang, Klein, Wolf & Smith, Portland.
Before Denecke, Chief Justice, and Tongue, Bryson, and Linde, Justices.
PER CURIAM.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff brought this action against defendant savings and loan association alleging that defendant paid money out of her account "without Plaintiffs signature, knowledge or consent" because defendant made these payments to plaintiff while she was "sick, distraught and semi-conscious and incapable of using her reason."
The trial court, sitting without a jury, found that "plaintiff has not sustained the burden of proof" and entered judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.
The plaintiff's brief does not assign or set out a single error of law made by the trial court that was preserved by objection. Instead, the brief generally discusses the facts and argues that the trial court should have found for plaintiff. In the absence of any preserved assignment of error, there is nothing before us to review. Castor v. Erlandson, 277 Or 147, 150, 560 P2d 267 (1977); Roshak v. Leathers, 277 Or 207, 218, 560 P2d 275 (1977). Moreover, we have examined the record and the plaintiff admitted that she signed the "withdrawal slips" and that the signature was hers. There is an abundance of evidence to support the trial judge's findings.
Affirmed.