Case Name: Ben Schweitzer et al., appellants, v. Philip Schneider et al., respondents
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1916-06-19
Citations: 86 N.J. Eq. 256
Docket Number: 
Parties: Ben Schweitzer et al., appellants, v. Philip Schneider et al., respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 86
Pages: 256–257

Head Matter:
Ben Schweitzer et al., appellants, v. Philip Schneider et al., respondents.
[Submitted April 5th, 1916.
Decided June 19th, 1916.]
On appeal from a decree of tlie court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Lewis, whose opinion is reported mte p. 88.
Messrs. Hudspeth & Rysdylc (Mr. Nathan Waxmcm, of the New York bar, on the brief), for the appellants.
Messrs. McDermott & Hwright (Messi’s. Hillquit ,& Levmi, of the New York bar, on the brief), for the respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree of the court of chancery is affirmed, for the reasons stated by the vice-chancellor in his opinion which is not to be taken as deciding that the funds in controversy were not charged with a trust in the hands of the respondents, as a superficial reading might indicate, but rather as defining the class of persons for whose benefit such trust exists, while denying that it exists for the .benefit of a certain other class.
No. 26—
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayee, Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Terhune, Heppenpieimee, Williams, Taylor, Gardner — 15.
For reversal — Fone.
No. 27—
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisce, Black, White, Terhune, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner — 15.
For reversal — None.