Case Name: MAX LOMACHINSKY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. LOUIS APRIL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1923-02-20
Citations: 1 N.J. Misc. 3
Docket Number: 
Parties: MAX LOMACHINSKY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. LOUIS APRIL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 1
Pages: 3–4

Head Matter:
MAX LOMACHINSKY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. LOUIS APRIL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Submitted December 21, 1922
Decided February 20, 1923.
On appeal from the District Court.
Before Justices Parker, Bergen and Minturn.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This case was marked to be submitted on briefs. There is no brief for the respondent, Eor the appellant, a brief is submitted, but the same is not signed by a counselor of this court. It is signed in the name of an attorney-at-law who is not a counselor. Such a brief, under the established practice, will not be considered, and the appeal will be dismissed. Hazard v. Phœnix Woodworking Co., 78 N. J. Eq. 568.