Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ricky Alan REESE, aka Ricky A. Reese, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-08-26
Citations: 539 F. App'x 752
Docket Number: No. 11-30100
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ricky Alan REESE, aka Ricky A. Reese, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, BERZON and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 539
Pages: 752–753

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ricky Alan REESE, aka Ricky A. Reese, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-30100.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Aug. 15, 2013.
Filed Aug. 26, 2013.
Stephan Alexander Collins, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Thomas Bradley, Jo Ann Far-rington, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Anchorage, AK, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Allison Elizabeth Mendel, Mendel & Associates, Anchorage, AK, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, BERZON and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Reese admits he didn't see the allegedly defective notice before trial, and doesn't allege he would have accepted a plea agreement but for the erroneous sentencing information. He therefore hasn't demonstrated that the alleged error "affected substantial rights." United States v. Gonzalez-Aparicio, 663 F.3d 419, 428 (9th Cir.2011).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.