Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Bernard Sam, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1999-06-28
Citations: 262 A.D.2d 665
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Bernard Sam, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 262
Pages: 665–665

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Bernard Sam, Appellant.
[691 NYS2d 359]

Opinion:
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, (Kohm, J.), rendered March 13, 1997, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's claim that the prosecutor failed to disclose Rosario materials (People v Rosario, 9 NY2d 286) was not preserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Laguer, 195 AD2d 483).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80, 86-87). Santucci, J. P., Luciano, Schmidt and Smith, JJ., concur.