Case Name: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. LOUIS ROMMEL, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1925-09-09
Citations: 102 N.J.L. 226
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. LOUIS ROMMEL, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 102
Pages: 226–226

Head Matter:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. LOUIS ROMMEL, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Submitted May 29, 1925
Decided September 9, 1925.
For the plaintiff in error, Lindabury & Steelman (Harry A. Augenblick, of counsel).
For the defendant in error, John O. Bigelow, prosecutor of the pleas.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Trenchard, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.