Case Name: SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY (a Corporation), Appellant, v. WILLIAM B. SHARP et al., Respondents
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1917-09-04
Citations: 34 Cal. App. 803
Docket Number: Civ. No. 2069
Parties: SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY (a Corporation), Appellant, v. WILLIAM B. SHARP et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports
Volume: 34
Pages: 803–803

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 2069.
First Appellate District.
September 4, 1917.]
SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY (a Corporation), Appellant, v. WILLIAM B. SHARP et al., Respondents.
Deed — Use of Word “Grant” — Covenant Against Encumbrances, When Implied.—Judgment affirmed on the authority of Southern Pacific Go. v. Dore et al., ante, p. 521.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Edward P. Shortall, Judge.
The facts are similar to those stated in Southern Pacific Co. v. Dore et al., ante, p. 521, [168 Pac. 147].
Frank McGowan, and H. C. Booth, for Appellant.
Dorsey & Henderson, for Respondents.

Opinion:
KERRIGAN, J.
As in the ease of the same plaintiff against Ellen Dore et al., No. 2068 (ante, p. 521, [168 Pac. 147]), this day decided, the appeal is from a judgment entered in favor of the defendants after demurrer sustained to the complaint. It presents the same point as did that case, and the question was submitted and argued on the same briefs. The conclusion arrived at there is controlling here, and for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in that case the judgment here is affirmed.
Richards, J., and Beasly, J., pro tem., concurred,
A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after .judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on November 3, 1917.