Case Name: Graciela MARTINEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant v. PRESTIGE FORD GARLAND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, doing business as Prestige Ford, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-01-14
Citations: 117 F. App'x 384
Docket Number: No. 04-10789
Parties: Graciela MARTINEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant v. PRESTIGE FORD GARLAND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, doing business as Prestige Ford, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 117
Pages: 384–384

Head Matter:
Graciela MARTINEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant v. PRESTIGE FORD GARLAND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, doing business as Prestige Ford, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 04-10789.
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Decided Jan. 14, 2005.
John Edward Wall, Jr., Law Offices of John E. Wall Jr., Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Jennifer S. Stoddard, Blume & Stoddard, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
We affirm the grant of summary judgment to defendant for essentially the reasons stated by Judge Lindsay in his detailed memorandum opinion.
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.