Case Name: Leland M. BEASLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2018-06-26
Citations: 549 S.W.3d 539
Docket Number: No. ED 105753
Parties: Leland M. BEASLEY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 549
Pages: 539–540

Head Matter:
Leland M. BEASLEY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 105753
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Filed: June 26, 2018
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Leland Beasley appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm.
An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).