Case Name: Frank CARTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROADWAY EXPRESS, INCORPORATED, LOCAL UNION 28; Local Union 28, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-02-11
Citations: 26 F. App'x 353
Docket Number: No. 01-1981
Parties: Frank CARTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROADWAY EXPRESS, INCORPORATED, LOCAL UNION 28; Local Union 28, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 26
Pages: 353–353

Head Matter:
Frank CARTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROADWAY EXPRESS, INCORPORATED, LOCAL UNION 28; Local Union 28, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 01-1981.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 23, 2002.
Decided Feb. 11, 2002.
Frank Carter, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Allison Phinney, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, Greenville, South Carolina; James Francis Wallington, Baptiste & Wilder, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Frank Carter appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Roadway Express, Inc., and Local Union 28 in this action alleging employment discrimination and breach of the union's duty of fair representation. 42 U.S.C. § 1981, 2000e-2 (1994); 29 U.S.C. § 158 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Carter v. Roadway Express, Inc., No. CA-99-3121-6-24AK (D.S.C. July 18, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.