Case Name: Bryce K. KENNEDY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2018-11-21
Citations: 257 So. 3d 1091
Docket Number: No. 4D18-2683
Parties: Bryce K. KENNEDY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 257
Pages: 1091–1091

Head Matter:
Bryce K. KENNEDY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D18-2683
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
[November 21, 2018]
Bryce K. Kennedy, Raiford, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We affirm the trial court order denying appellant's motion to correct illegal sentence. In his initial brief, appellant raised for the first time a challenge to his sentences based on Graham v. Florida , 560 U.S. 48, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010). It was not part of his motion filed below. Accordingly, we affirm without prejudice to his right to raise that challenge by proper motion in the trial court. Cotto v. State , 141 So.3d 615, 616 n.1 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (citing Atwell v. State , 128 So.3d 167, 169 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) ).
Gross, Damoorgian and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.