Case Name: Alvin A. Gage et al., Resp'ts, v. Julius Lippman et al., App'lts
Court: New York Court of Common Pleas
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1894-12-03
Citations: 64 N.Y. St. Rep. 872
Docket Number: 
Parties: Alvin A. Gage et al., Resp’ts, v. Julius Lippman et al., App’lts
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 64
Pages: 872–872

Head Matter:
Alvin A. Gage et al., Resp’ts, v. Julius Lippman et al., App’lts
N. Y. C. P. General Term,
December 3, 1894.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss the appeal should be denied. The appellants served the printed cases on appeal several years ago, and the respondents could have brought the case on for hearing at any time. The appellants urge that the respondents have violated their stipulation to mark the printed case settled, as containing all the evidence. This allegation is not denied. The cause had better be brought on at the next term, and disposed of in the ordinary way.