Case Name: Sandra L. TREAT, Petitioner/Respondent, v. David W. TREAT, Respondent/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-06-12
Citations: 46 S.W.3d 664
Docket Number: No. ED 77627
Parties: Sandra L. TREAT, Petitioner/Respondent, v. David W. TREAT, Respondent/Appellant.
Judges: Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., PAUL J. SIMON, and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 46
Pages: 664–665

Head Matter:
Sandra L. TREAT, Petitioner/Respondent, v. David W. TREAT, Respondent/Appellant.
No. ED 77627.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
June 12, 2001.
Terry Lee Jones, Law office of Bely, Jones & Hickel, Clayton, MO, for Respondent.
John K. Greider, Clayton, MO, for Appellant.
Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., PAUL J. SIMON, and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
David W. Treat appeals from a trial court judgment denying his Motion to Modify/Terminate Maintenance. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, nor does it erroneously declare or apply the law. Hartzell v. Hartzell, 976 S.W.2d 624, 626 (Mo.App. E.D.1998). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).