Case Name: August Meinhardt, Individually and for the Benefit of Approximately Thirty Ex-Members of Local Union 345 of the International Union of United Brewery, Flour, Cereal and Soft Drink Workers of America, Similarly Situated, Respondent, v. Charles Flynn, as President of Local Union 345 of the International Union of United Brewery, Flour, Cereal and Soft Drink Workers of America, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1937-03-25
Citations: 250 A.D. 783
Docket Number: 
Parties: August Meinhardt, Individually and for the Benefit of Approximately Thirty Ex-Members of Local Union 345 of the International Union of United Brewery, Flour, Cereal and Soft Drink Workers of America, Similarly Situated, Respondent, v. Charles Flynn, as President of Local Union 345 of the International Union of United Brewery, Flour, Cereal and Soft Drink Workers of America, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 250
Pages: 783–784

Head Matter:
August Meinhardt, Individually and for the Benefit of Approximately Thirty Ex-Members of Local Union 345 of the International Union of United Brewery, Flour, Cereal and Soft Drink Workers of America, Similarly Situated, Respondent, v. Charles Flynn, as President of Local Union 345 of the International Union of United Brewery, Flour, Cereal and Soft Drink Workers of America, Appellant.

Opinion:
Action for a permanent mandatory injunction and for damages. Plaintiff sues on behalf of himself and others similarly situated to be reinstated to membership in the trades union of which the defendant is president, on the ground of improper exclusion or expulsion from the rights, benefits and privileges of membership. Order framing issues of fact for trial by a jury modified by striking therefrom items 2, 3, 4 and 5, and by inserting therein two items for framed questions covering issues of fact arising from the denial of the allegations in paragraphs thirteenth and fourteenth of the complaint. As thus modified the order is affirmed, without costs. The items struck out are not questions of fact. The remaining items seem not to cover all the questions of fact. Hence an opportunity to frame two additional questions is afforded to the plaintiff. The Special Term's discretion in granting the order under section 430, Civil Practice Act, may not be disturbed. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Close, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice. [See Thomann v. Flynn, post, p. 785.]