Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Darwyn D. STRONG, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-03-05
Citations: 70 S.W.3d 612
Docket Number: No. ED 79308
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Darwyn D. STRONG, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before GEORGE W. DRAPER III, P.J., and MARY R. RUSSELL, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 70
Pages: 612–613

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Darwyn D. STRONG, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 79308.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
March 5, 2002.
Douglas R. Hoff, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General; Anne E. Edgington, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before GEORGE W. DRAPER III, P.J., and MARY R. RUSSELL, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Darwyn D. Strong (Defendant) appeals the judgment and sentence entered after a jury verdict finding him guilty of one count of first-degree murder in violation of Section 565.020 RSMo 1994 (Count I), three counts of armed criminal action in violation of Section 571.015 (Counts II, IV, VI), one count of first-degree robbery in violation of Section 569.020 (Count III), and one count of first-degree assault in violation of Section 565.050 (Count V). The trial court sentenced Defendant to concurrent and consecutive terms of imprisonment aggre gating a total of life without the possibility of parole plus forty years.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no jurisprudential purpose. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).
The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 80.25(b).
. Unless otherwise noted, all subsequent statutory citations are to RSMo 1994.