Case Name: Kemar Barrette, Appellant, v. Albert Vicente, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2016-03-22
Citations: 137 A.D.3d 599
Docket Number: 
Parties: Kemar Barrette, Appellant, v Albert Vicente, Respondent.
Judges: Concur—Sweeny, J.P., Renwick, Moskowitz and Gische, JJ.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 137
Pages: 599–599

Head Matter:
Kemar Barrette, Appellant, v Albert Vicente, Respondent.
[26 NYS3d 700]

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lizbeth Gonzalez, J.), entered December 23, 2014, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The record demonstrates that defendant, while driving in the center lane of the Grand Concourse, first saw plaintiff a "millisecond" before impact, when he was approximately one car length away from plaintiff. Defendant, who was traveling below the 30-mile-per-hour speed limit, swerved his car to the right, moving into the outermost lane of travel, avoiding full-on impact with plaintiff. However, the rear tire of defendant's car ran over plaintiff's foot. The record further shows that plaintiff was dressed in dark clothing from head to foot, was attempting to cross the Grand Concourse at night while outside of a crosswalk, and stepped directly in front of defendant's vehicle. Under these circumstances, dismissal of the complaint was warranted (see Ramirez v Molina, 114 AD3d 540 [1st Dept 2014]).
Concur—Sweeny, J.P., Renwick, Moskowitz and Gische, JJ.