Case Name: Fred FISHER, Employee/Respondent, v. MOLINE CONSUMERS, Employer/Appellant, and Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., Insurer/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-06-26
Citations: 48 S.W.3d 115
Docket Number: No. ED 78786
Parties: Fred FISHER, Employee/Respondent, v. MOLINE CONSUMERS, Employer/Appellant, and Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., Insurer/Appellant.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 48
Pages: 115–116

Head Matter:
Fred FISHER, Employee/Respondent, v. MOLINE CONSUMERS, Employer/Appellant, and Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., Insurer/Appellant.
No. ED 78786.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
June 26, 2001.
Valentine & Rouse, John F. Sander, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Larsen, Feist & Bedell, P.C., John J. Larsen, Jr., St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellants, Moline Consumers and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, appeal from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission allowing compensation for total disability benefits to respondent Fred Fisher. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcript and find the judgment is supported by competent and substantial evidence. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).