Case Name: Campbell v. Jimenes et al
Court: New York City Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1893
Citations: 5 Misc. 593
Docket Number: 
Parties: Campbell v. Jimenes et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 5
Pages: 593–593

Head Matter:
Campbell v. Jimenes et al.
William F. Randel, for plaintiff (respondent).
Tracy, Boardmam & Platt, for defendants (appellants)..

Opinion:
Newburger, J.
Our appellate court having held (Campbell v. Jimenes, 3 Misc. Rep. 144) that the terms of the contract between plaintiff and defendant were ambiguous, and that the meaning of the instrument can only be determined by a jury, the trial justice, therefore, properly denied the defendants' motion to dismiss.
There appears to be no other exception in the case of merit,. and judgment must, therefore* be affirmed, with costs.
Ehrlich, Ch. J., concurs.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.