Case Name: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Patricia RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-08-13
Citations: 71 F. App'x 758
Docket Number: No. 02-50550; D.C. No. CR-02-00740-TJW
Parties: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Patricia RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KLEINFELD and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges, and POGUE, Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 71
Pages: 758–759

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Patricia RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-50550. D.C. No. CR-02-00740-TJW.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 17, 2003.
Decided Aug. 13, 2003.
Before KLEINFELD and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges, and POGUE, Judge.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
Honorable Donald C. Pogue, United States Court of International Trade Judge, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Appellant Patricia Rodriguez challenges the district court's denial of her motion to dismiss the indictment against her, arguing that the grand jury instructions improperly limited the scope of the grand jury's inquiry in violation of the Fifth Amendment. Appellant's claim is foreclosed by this Court's decision in United States v. Marcucci, 299 F.3d 1156, 1159-60 (9th Cir.2002), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 1600, 155 L.Ed.2d 334 (2003). See also United States v. Cedano-Arellano, 332 F.3d 568, 573 (9th Cir.2003). We therefore affirm the district court's denial of the motion.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.