Case Name: Sterling CUMMINGS, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1993-09-07
Citations: 860 S.W.2d 395
Docket Number: No. 63282
Parties: Sterling CUMMINGS, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 860
Pages: 395–395

Head Matter:
Sterling CUMMINGS, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 63282.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Sept. 7, 1993.
Elizabeth Haines, St. Louis, for movant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Sterling Cummings, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The judgments of conviction which movant sought to vacate were for forgery, stealing from a person, and the fraudulent use of a credit device. He was sentenced to concurrent terms of imprisonment of seven years, seven years, and one year.
The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).