Case Name: In the Matter of the Claim of Chafik Hassane, Appellant. John E. Sweeney, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1997-07-17
Citations: 241 A.D.2d 730
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Claim of Chafik Hassane, Appellant. John E. Sweeney, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 241
Pages: 730–731

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Claim of Chafik Hassane, Appellant. John E. Sweeney, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
[660 NYS2d 188]

Opinion:
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 19, 1995, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Upon reviewing the restaurant sales receipts for the evening of June 7, 1995, it was discovered that claimant, a waiter, had been double-tipped by four separate customers. Claimant was discharged from his employment for failing to follow the employer's policy of informing customers that a gratuity had already been added to their bills and to bring it to their attention if they had left a double tip. The evidence presented established that an incident of double tipping was highly unusual and that the gratuity added by the four customers was almost equal to the gratuity which had already been calculated into their bills. Although primarily circumstantial, substantial evidence supports the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board's assessment of the credibility of the witnesses and the inferences drawn from the evidence presented (see, Matter of Di Maria v Ross, 52 NY2d 771, 772; Matter of Padilla [Sephardic Home for the Aged—Roberts], 113 AD2d 997).
Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, White and Casey, JJ., concur.