Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Scott BARMORE, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-11-20
Citations: 66 S.W.3d 94
Docket Number: No. ED 78648
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Scott BARMORE, Appellant.
Judges: Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 66
Pages: 94–95

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Scott BARMORE, Appellant.
No. ED 78648.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Nov. 20, 2001.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 10, 2002.
Application for Transfer Denied Feb. 26, 2002.
Raymund J. Capelovitch, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Stephanie Morrell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Scott Barmore (Appellant) appeals from a judgment of the trial court convicting him of two counts of robbery in the first degree, in violation of Section 569.020. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not err (1) in denying Appellant's motion to find joinder improper and sever the two robbery charges; and (2) in overruling Appellant's motion to suppress the two pretrial voice identifications of him. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).
. All statutory references are to RSMo (2000), unless otherwise indicated.