Case Name: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Giegel
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1990-12-12
Citations: 56 Ohio St. 3d 58
Docket Number: No. 90-1125
Parties: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Giegel.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 56
Pages: 58–60

Head Matter:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Giegel.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Giegel (1990), 56 Ohio St. 3d 58.]
(No. 90-1125
Submitted July 31, 1990
Decided December 12, 1990.)
J. Warren Bettis, disciplinary counsel, and Karen B. Hull, for relator Office of Disciplinary Counsel.
John T. Jeandrevin and John C. Oberholtzer, for relator Medina County Bar Association.
Charles W. Kettlewell, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We concur with the board's findings and recommendations. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law. Moreover, the court admonishes respondent that in any application for reinstatement, the court will look for proof that respondent has resolved his alcohol abuse problems and made restitution to persons injured by his misconduct. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.