Case Name: In re: Jorge PORTE, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-03-24
Citations: 173 F. App'x 153
Docket Number: No. 06-1059
Parties: In re: Jorge PORTE, Petitioner.
Judges: Before RENDELL, AMBRO and BECKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 173
Pages: 153–154

Head Matter:
In re: Jorge PORTE, Petitioner.
No. 06-1059.
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Submitted Under Rule 21, Fed. R.App. Pro. March 16, 2006.
Decided March 24, 2006.
Jorge Porte, Lisbon, OH, pro se.
Nathanael J. Byerly, Office of United States Attorney, Harrisburg, PA, Respondent.
Before RENDELL, AMBRO and BECKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
OPINION
PER CURIAM
In July 2004 Jorge Porte filed a habeas corpus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. In December 2005 Porte filed a mandamus petition seeking an order compelling the District Court to rule on his petition. Shortly thereafter the District Court did so, denying the petition on January 9, 2006.
Accordingly, the mandamus petition is moot, and we will deny it.