Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v. John McLoughlin, Also Known as Earl Randolph, Respondent. In the Matter of New York Times Company, Appellant; District Attorney, New York County, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1985-05-30
Citations: 65 N.Y. 687
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v John McLoughlin, Also Known as Earl Randolph, Respondent. In the Matter of New York Times Company, Appellant; District Attorney, New York County, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 65
Pages: 687–688

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v John McLoughlin, Also Known as Earl Randolph, Respondent. In the Matter of New York Times Company, Appellant; District Attorney, New York County, Respondent.
Argued May 2, 1985;
decided May 30, 1985
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
John G. Koeltl, James C. Goodale, John S. Kiernan, Susan D. Charkes, Katherine P. Darrow and George Freeman for appellant.
H. Spencer Kupperman and Christopher K. Sowers for John McLoughlin, respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order appealed from was entered in a criminal action with respect to a motion determined by the Criminal Court of the City of New York, a court of criminal jurisdiction, and is not an order appealable to the Court of Appeals under CPL 450.90 (compare, Matter of Hynes v Karassik, 47 NY2d 659, 661, n 1, dealing with a matter determined by Supreme Court, a court having both civil and criminal jurisdiction).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Kassal. Taking no part: Judges Alexander and Titone.