Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Larry NASON, Defendant/Appellant; Larry NASON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1997-02-25
Citations: 939 S.W.2d 533
Docket Number: Nos. 68753, 70633
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Larry NASON, Defendant/Appellant. Larry NASON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 939
Pages: 533–534

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Larry NASON, Defendant/Appellant. Larry NASON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Nos. 68753, 70633.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Feb. 25, 1997.
Gwenda R. Robinson, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Stephen D. Hawke, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals after his conviction by a jury of one count of first degree burglary, § 569.160, RSMo 1994. The court sentenced him as a prior and persistent offender to a prison term of twenty years. Defendant also appeals the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.
We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).