Case Name: Louis WESTMORELAND, et al., Respondents, v. Don WOMACK, et al., Appellants
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-01-28
Citations: 98 S.W.3d 91
Docket Number: No. ED 80577
Parties: Louis WESTMORELAND, et al., Respondents, v. Don WOMACK, et al., Appellants.
Judges: Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, C.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and MARYK. HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 98
Pages: 91–92

Head Matter:
Louis WESTMORELAND, et al., Respondents, v. Don WOMACK, et al., Appellants.
No. ED 80577.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Jan. 28, 2003.
Robert Herman, St. Louis, MO, for appellants.
William F. Whealan, Jr., Michael P. Steeno, Clayton, MO, for respondents.
Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, C.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and MARYK. HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Don Womack and Brian Teipel ("Contractors") appeal the judgment entered following a bench trial in favor of Louis and Joyce Westmoreland ("Homeowners") on their claim for breach of a contract to remodel and restore a cabin. The sole damages sought by Homeowners was the amount of their initial deposit. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would be of no prece-dential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).