Case Name: KARCOL FARMS, Petitioner, v. Pedro GONZALEZ and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1966-02-02
Citations: 182 So. 2d 412
Docket Number: No. 34636
Parties: KARCOL FARMS, Petitioner, v. Pedro GONZALEZ and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
Judges: THORNAL, C. J., and ROBERTS,. DREW and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 182
Pages: 412–412

Head Matter:
KARCOL FARMS, Petitioner, v. Pedro GONZALEZ and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
No. 34636.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Feb. 2, 1966.
Feb. 2, 1966.
Frank M. Hamilton, of Fleming, O’Bryan & Fleming, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.
Donald F. Frost, Allen Clements, Miami, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date June 30, 1965.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. See Thomas Smith Farms, Inc. v. Alday, Fla., 182 So.2d 405, opinion filed February 2, 1966.
The petition is therefore denied.
THORNAL, C. J., and ROBERTS,. DREW and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
THOMAS and CALDWELL, JJ., dissent.