Case Name: NORTON et al., Respondents, v. MATTHEWS et al., Appellants
Court: New York Superior Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1895-01-07
Citations: 31 N.Y.S. 1131
Docket Number: 
Parties: NORTON et al., Respondents, v. MATTHEWS et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 31
Pages: 1131–1131

Head Matter:
NORTON et al., Respondents, v. MATTHEWS et al., Appellants.
(Superior Court of New York City, General Term.
January 7, 1895.)
Action by Benjamin A. Norton and others against James W. Matthews and others to set aside an assignment as fraudulent, and for other relief.
For opinion of trial judge at equity term, see 28 N. Y. Supp. 265.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellants having failed to print the evidence given upon the trial by the parties, the findings of fact made by the learned trial judge must be deemed to have been made upon sufficient evidence. The only question raised by the appeal, therefore, is whether the conclusions of law are warranted by the facts as found. Upon a careful consideration of this question we think they are. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs, upon the opinion filed below.