Case Name: James E. Williams et al., Respondents v. Richard Rogers, Appellant, and Mt. View Welding Service, Inc., et al., Respondents; U. S. Cablevision Corporation, Respondent, v. Mountain View Welding & Fabricating Company, Inc., Respondent, and Richard Rogers, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1981-03-30
Citations: 80 A.D.2d 913
Docket Number: 
Parties: James E. Williams et al., Respondents v Richard Rogers, Appellant, and Mt. View Welding Service, Inc., et al., Respondents. U. S. Cablevision Corporation, Respondent, v Mountain View Welding & Fabricating Company, Inc., Respondent, and Richard Rogers, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 80
Pages: 913–913

Head Matter:
James E. Williams et al., Respondents v Richard Rogers, Appellant, and Mt. View Welding Service, Inc., et al., Respondents. U. S. Cablevision Corporation, Respondent, v Mountain View Welding & Fabricating Company, Inc., Respondent, and Richard Rogers, Appellant.

Opinion:
In consolidated negligence actions, one to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the other to recover damages for injury to property, defendant Rogers appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, dated July 12, 1980 and entered in Dutchess County, which denied his motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The demonstrated existence of triable issues of fact regarding the reliability of the moving defendant renders the denial of his motion for summary judgment justified. Rabin, J.P., Gulotta, Weinstein and Thompson, JJ., concur.