Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Chris Richard DREW, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-10-05
Citations: 202 F. App'x 49
Docket Number: No. 06-10011
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Chris Richard DREW, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before JONES, Chief Judge, and SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 202
Pages: 49–50

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Chris Richard DREW, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-10011
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Oct. 5, 2006.
Susan B. Cowger, Jerri L. Sims, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Jason Douglas Hawkins, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before JONES, Chief Judge, and SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Chris Richard Drew raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. McCarty, 36 F.3d 1349, 1361 (5th Cir.1994), which held that the Double Jeopardy Clause does not bar punishments under both 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) and 2113(a) and (d). The Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.