Case Name: Louis Peragallo, respondent, v. Philip Oneto et al., appellants
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1926-05-17
Citations: 99 N.J. Eq. 889
Docket Number: 
Parties: Louis Peragallo, respondent, v. Philip Oneto et al., appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 99
Pages: 889–889

Head Matter:
Louis Peragallo, respondent, v. Philip Oneto et al., appellants.
[Decided May 17th, 1926.]
Mr. Anthony P. La Porta, for the respondent.
Messrs. Stuhr & Vogt, for the appellants.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Griffin.
For affirmance — Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.