Case Name: In the Interest of J.L.C., N.R.C., J.S.C., and R.D.C.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2013-12-17
Citations: 416 S.W.3d 349
Docket Number: No. ED 99680
Parties: In the Interest of J.L.C., N.R.C., J.S.C., and R.D.C.
Judges: Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J. and GLENN A. NORTON, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 416
Pages: 349–349

Head Matter:
In the Interest of J.L.C., N.R.C., J.S.C., and R.D.C.
No. ED 99680.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Dec. 17, 2013.
David A. Shaller, Saint Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Alii Wolff, Clayton, MO, for Respondent.
Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J. and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
V.M.C. ("Mother") appeals the judgment terminating her parental rights to J.L.C., N.R.C., J.S.C, and R.D.C. We find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Mother's motion for a continuance.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).