Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Wade B. COOK, Defendant - Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-03-18
Citations: 311 F. App'x 8
Docket Number: No. 07-30446
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Wade B. COOK, Defendant — Appellant.
Judges: Before: WALLACE, LEAVY and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 311
Pages: 8–8

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Wade B. COOK, Defendant — Appellant.
No. 07-30446.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
March 12, 2008.
Filed March 18, 2008.
Kurt P. Hermanns, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tacoma, WA, Helen J. Brunner, Esq., Robert Henry Westinghouse, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Angelo J. Calfo, Esq., Jordan Gross, Esq., Yarmuth Wilsdon Calfo, PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: WALLACE, LEAVY and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
This an appeal of a district court order dated November 9, 2007 denying appellant's motion to strike certain proposed conditions of release while free on bail pending appeal.
Appellant's motion for stay pending appeal of the district court's order is denied and we summarily affirm the district court's judgment denying appellant's motion to strike certain proposed conditions of release while free on bail pending appeal. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.)
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.