Case Name: BOULEVARD APARTMENTS, INC., SKYLINE APARTMENTS, INC., GRAND VIEW GARDENS, INC., ALL CORPORATIONS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND SAMUEL A. ZUCKER, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. BOROUGH OF HASBROUCK HEIGHTS, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1966-01-20
Citations: 90 N.J. Super. 242
Docket Number: 
Parties: BOULEVARD APARTMENTS, INC., SKYLINE APARTMENTS, INC., GRAND VIEW GARDENS, INC., ALL CORPORATIONS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND SAMUEL A. ZUCKER, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. BOROUGH OF HASBROUCK HEIGHTS, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 90
Pages: 242–242

Head Matter:
BOULEVARD APARTMENTS, INC., SKYLINE APARTMENTS, INC., GRAND VIEW GARDENS, INC., ALL CORPORATIONS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND SAMUEL A. ZUCKER, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. BOROUGH OF HASBROUCK HEIGHTS, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued January 13, 1966
Decided January 20, 1966.
Before Judges Gaumon, Labreoque and Brown.
Mr. Ralph W. Ghandless argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Ghandless, Weller Kramer, attorneys).
Mr. Herbert G. Klein argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Krieger & Klein, attorneys; Mr. Benedict Krieger and Mr. Klein, of counsel).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Schneider in the Law Division. See Boulevard Apartments, Inc. v. Hasbrouck Heights, 86 N. J. Super. 189 (Law Div. 1965).