Case Name: Ethel Thompson SWEITZER, Petitioner, v. Dawn M. THOMAS, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2004-03-25
Citations: 870 So. 2d 791
Docket Number: No. SC03-165
Parties: Ethel Thompson SWEITZER, Petitioner, v. Dawn M. THOMAS, Respondent.
Judges: ANSTEAD, C.J., and WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 870
Pages: 791–791

Head Matter:
Ethel Thompson SWEITZER, Petitioner, v. Dawn M. THOMAS, Respondent.
No. SC03-165.
Supreme Court of Florida.
March 25, 2004.
Sharon Lee Stedman, Orlando, FL; and Scott Turner of Turner & Layman, L.L.C., Melbourne, FL, for Petitioner.
Julie H. Littky-Rubin of Lytal, Reiter, Clark, Fountain & Williams, LLP, West Palm Beach, FL; and Karla T. Torpy and Robert M. Moletteire of Graham, Molet-teire & Torpy, P.A., Melbourne, FL, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Sweitzer v. Thomas, 834 So.2d 283 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002), a decision alleged to be in express and direct conflict with Loring v. Winters, 802 So.2d 335 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we have now determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, this review proceeding is hereby dismissed.
It is so ordered.
ANSTEAD, C.J., and WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.