Case Name: F. M. WYNNS v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD et al.
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 1921-03-02
Citations: 181 N.C. 477
Docket Number: 
Parties: F. M. WYNNS v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: North Carolina Reports
Volume: 181
Pages: 477–477

Head Matter:
F. M. WYNNS v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD et al.
(Filed 2 March, 1921.)
Appeal by defendant from Lyon, J., at November Term, 1920, of Beetle.
Civil action for damages, tried upon an alleged negligent injury to plaintiff’s two mules. Yerdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff. Defendants appealed.
Winston & Matthews for plaintiff.
J. N. Pruden and Oillam & Davenport for defendants.

Opinion:
Pee Cubiam.
Upon the argument of this cause, defendants relied entirely upon their motion for judgment as of nonsuit, assigning as error his Honor's refusal to grant the same. Considering the evidence in its most favorable light for the plaintiff, the accepted position on such motion, we think the testimony was sufficient to be submitted to the jury,,. under authority of Ramsbottom v. R. R., 138 N. C., 38.
No error.