Case Name: Earl B. COLLINS et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees and Cross-Appellants, v. Donald H. RUMSFELD et al., Defendants-Appellants and Cross-Appellees, and other consolidated cases
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1977-08-25
Citations: 559 F.2d 1178
Docket Number: Nos. 75-2935, 75-2967, 75-3238, 75-3348, 75-3432 and 75-3559
Parties: Earl B. COLLINS et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees and Cross-Appellants, v. Donald H. RUMSFELD et al., Defendants-Appellants and Cross-Appellees, and other consolidated cases.
Judges: Before CHAMBERS and SNEED, Circuit Judges, and SWEIGERT , District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 559
Pages: 1178–1178

Head Matter:
Earl B. COLLINS et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees and Cross-Appellants, v. Donald H. RUMSFELD et al., Defendants-Appellants and Cross-Appellees, and other consolidated cases.
Nos. 75-2935, 75-2967, 75-3238, 75-3348, 75-3432 and 75-3559.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Aug. 25, 1977.
Eric A. Seitz, Honolulu, Hawaii, argued for appellees in 75-2935 and for appellants in 75-2967.
Scott J. Tepper, Los Angeles, Cal., argued for appellees in 75-2935, 75-3238, 75-3432 & 75-3559, and for appellants in 75-2967 & 75-3348.
Neil H. Koslowe, Atty., U.S. Dept, of Justice, Washington, D.C., argued for appellees in 75-2967 & 75-3348, and for appellants in 75-2935, 75-3238, 75-3432 & 75-3559.
Before CHAMBERS and SNEED, Circuit Judges, and SWEIGERT , District Judge.
Honorable William T. Sweigert, Senior United States District Judge, Northern District of California, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Our previous decision in this consolidated appeal, Collins v. Rumsfeld, 542 F.2d 1109 (9th Cir. 1976), was vacated and remanded to us by the Supreme Court "for further consideration in light of United States v. Larionoff, 431 U.S. —, 97 S.Ct. 2150, 53 L.Ed.2d 48 (1977)." Saylors v. United States, — U.S. —, 97 S.Ct. 2945, 53 L.Ed.2d 1075 (1977), vacating Collins v. Rumsfeld, 542 F.2d 1109 (9th Cir. 1976). The Court's decision in Larionoff controls the case before us. The judgments of the district courts are AFFIRMED.