Case Name: Johnnie GRAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1997-03-26
Citations: 693 So. 2d 626
Docket Number: No. 96-04552
Parties: Johnnie GRAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and BLUE and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 693
Pages: 626–626

Head Matter:
Johnnie GRAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 96-04552.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
March 26, 1997.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Johnnie Gray, seeks review of the summary denial of his postconviction motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm the trial court's denial of relief on grounds two, three and four, as the issues could or should have been raised on direct appeal and are therefore procedurally barred and cannot be raised in a postconviction motion. Harvey v. Dugger, 656 So.2d 1253 (Fla.1995). We affirm the trial court's determination that no relief is warranted on ground seven as the claim is facially insufficient. However, we reverse and remand for further proceedings on Gray's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel and fundamental error in counts one, five, six, eight and nine. The trial court denied the motion without attaching any documentation which would refute these claims.
On remand, should the trial court again deny the motion, it must attach portions of the record which conclusively demonstrate Gray is not entitled to relief on these claims. See Becton v. State, 668 So.2d 1107 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and BLUE and QUINCE, JJ., concur.