Case Name: Carl Lorinzo CAPERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CLARK, Kitchen Dietician; Harrington, Kitchen Dietician; Bullock, Unit Superintendent; Richard Neely, Supervisor of Administrations; Edith Walrath, Medical Supervisor; Aldridge; Kory Dalrymple; Lawrence Parsons, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-06-01
Citations: 475 F. App'x 826
Docket Number: No. 11-6257
Parties: Carl Lorinzo CAPERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CLARK, Kitchen Dietician; Harrington, Kitchen Dietician; Bullock, Unit Superintendent; Richard Neely, Supervisor of Administrations; Edith Walrath, Medical Supervisor; Aldridge; Kory Dalrymple; Lawrence Parsons, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 475
Pages: 826–826

Head Matter:
Carl Lorinzo CAPERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CLARK, Kitchen Dietician; Harrington, Kitchen Dietician; Bullock, Unit Superintendent; Richard Neely, Supervisor of Administrations; Edith Walrath, Medical Supervisor; Aldridge; Kory Dalrymple; Lawrence Parsons, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 11-6257.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 26, 20111.
Decided: June 1, 2011.
Carl Lorinzo Capers, Appellant Pro Se.
Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Carl Lorinzo Capers appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Capers v. Covington, No. 3:11-cv-00048-RJC, 2011 WL 577020 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 8, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.