Case Name: Mary Julia DETTER, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. SCHNUCK MARKETS, INC., Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-06-30
Citations: 974 S.W.2d 605
Docket Number: No. 73361
Parties: Mary Julia DETTER, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. SCHNUCK MARKETS, INC., Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANE, P.J., and RHODES RUSSELL and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 974
Pages: 605–605

Head Matter:
Mary Julia DETTER, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. SCHNUCK MARKETS, INC., Defendant/Respondent.
No. 73361.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
June 30, 1998.
Rehearing Denied Aug. 26, 1998.
Paul J. Passanante, Joan M. Tanner, St. Louis, for Plaintiff/Appellant.
Russell F. Watters, Michael B. Maguire, T. Michael Ward, Bart B. Zuckerman, Brown & James, P.C., St. Louis, for Defendant/Respondent.
Before CRANE, P.J., and RHODES RUSSELL and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff appeals from summary judgment entered against her on her claim against supermarket to recover damages for injuries suffered when she was assaulted, battered, and robbed by an unknown assailant on supermarket's parking lot. We affirm.
The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).