Case Name: James M. Tuttle, appellant, v. Richard P. Rothwell, respondent
Court: New York Superior Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1884-02-04
Citations: 18 Jones & S. 526
Docket Number: 
Parties: James M. Tuttle, appellant, v. Richard P. Rothwell, respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Reports of cases argued and determined in the Superior Court of the city of New York
Volume: 50
Pages: 526–526

Head Matter:
James M. Tuttle, appellant, v. Richard P. Rothwell, respondent.
Decided February 4, 1884.
Appeal by plaintiff from order striking from the complaint irrelevant and redundant allegations. Motion by respondent to dismiss the appeal.
Edward M. Shepard, for appellant;
Abram Kling, for respondent.
Before Sedgwick, Ch. J., and O’ Gorman, J.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Order appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs, and disbursements to be faxed. The court does not pass upon the merits of the motion to dismiss, but having affirmed the order, denies the motion, formally, without costs.