Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Charlton Hightower, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1997-03-18
Citations: 237 A.D.2d 166
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charlton Hightower, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 237
Pages: 166–166

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charlton Hightower, Appellant.
[654 NYS2d 759]

Opinion:
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Allen Alpert, J.), rendered April 19, 1994, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second and third degrees, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 22 years to life and 20 years to life, respectively, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly denied defendant's request for a temporary lawful possession charge, since there was no reasonable view of the evidence supporting such charge (People v Banks, 76 NY2d 799, 801; People v Snyder, 73 NY2d 900; People v Williams, 50 NY2d 1043).
Since defendant had made a statement to the police consisting, under the circumstances, of an admission of guilt, he was properly cross-examined concerning that statement's omission of the exculpatory material defendant presented in his testimony (People v Savage, 50 NY2d 673, cert denied 449 US 1016; People v Spinelli, 214 AD2d 135, 141-142). We further conclude that defendant's cross-examination of the arresting officer concerning defendant's postarrest statement and subsequent silence opened the door to redirect examination on the same subject.
The court's Sandoval ruling was a proper exercise of discretion (see, People v Pavao, 59 NY2d 282, 292).
We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion. Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger and Rubin, JJ.