Case Name: THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. HARRY KNOWLES (IMPLEADED), PLAINTIFF IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1926-04-08
Citations: 102 N.J.L. 726
Docket Number: 
Parties: THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. HARRY KNOWLES (IMPLEADED), PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 102
Pages: 726–727

Head Matter:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. HARRY KNOWLES (IMPLEADED), PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Submitted February 12, 1926
Decided April 8, 1926.
For the defendant in error, John O. Bigelow.
For the plaintiff in error, Harry Simandl.

Opinion:
Pee Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 9.
For reversal — None.