Case Name: Albert Bradick, Respondent, v. Rudolph H. Deetjen et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1953-10-27
Citations: 282 A.D. 870
Docket Number: 
Parties: Albert Bradick, Respondent, v. Rudolph H. Deetjen et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 282
Pages: 870–871

Head Matter:
Albert Bradick, Respondent, v. Rudolph H. Deetjen et al., Appellants.

Opinion:
To establish the allegations of completely false presentation of actual partnership affairs in connection with the agreements and the release, plaintiff was entitled to (a), (b), (e), (d) and (£). Order unanimously modified accordingly and, as so modified, affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the plaintiff-respondent. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Callahan, Breitel and Bastow, JJ.