Case Name: A. W. BLACK, Respondent, v. B. F. GOODIN et al., Appellants
Court: Supreme Court of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1864-09-05
Citations: 1 Cal. Unrep. 155
Docket Number: No. 404
Parties: A. W. BLACK, Respondent, v. B. F. GOODIN et al., Appellants.
Judges: "We concur: Sawyer, J.; Currey, J.; Shafter, J.; Rhodes, J.
Reporter: California Unreported Cases
Volume: 1
Pages: 155–155

Head Matter:
A. W. BLACK, Respondent, v. B. F. GOODIN et al., Appellants.
No. 404;
September 5, 1864.
Appeal — Maimer of Preparing — Indifference to Statute. — In order to have the court consider an appeal the appellant must bring it agreeably to the one hundred and ninety-fifth section of the Practice Act; gross irregularities in the manner of bringing the case up cannot be overlooked.
A. W. Thompson for respondent; C. W. Langdon for appellants.

Opinion:
SANDERSON, C. J.
This is an appeal from an order refusing a new trial. The motion seems to have been made upon something supposed to be a statement, but the record contains nothing which we can regard as such. There is nothing which purports to be a statement, nor is there anything agreed to by the parties, or settled by the judge, or certified to be correct as such by either. By examining the record and consulting the one hundred and ninety-fifth section of the Practice Act, counsel for appellants will readily perceive that the record in no respect complies Avith the statute.
Judgment affirmed.
"We concur: Sawyer, J.; Currey, J.; Shafter, J.; Rhodes, J.