Case Name: Lynn WORTHAM, Appellant, v. CASINO QUEEN, INC., Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-04-15
Citations: 112 S.W.3d 11
Docket Number: No. ED 81723
Parties: Lynn WORTHAM, Appellant, v. CASINO QUEEN, INC., Respondent.
Judges: Before PAUL J. SIMON, P.J. and GARY M. GAERTNER, SR. and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 112
Pages: 11–12

Head Matter:
Lynn WORTHAM, Appellant, v. CASINO QUEEN, INC., Respondent.
No. ED 81723.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
April 15, 2003.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied June 10, 2003.
William Goldstein, Moran & Goldstein, L.C., Stanley E. Goldstein, Eli Karsh, Li- berman, Goldstein & Karsh, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Kristine McGee Mack, Michael J. Nes-ter, Donovan, Rose, Nester & Joley, P.C., Belleville, IL, for Respondent.
Before PAUL J. SIMON, P.J. and GARY M. GAERTNER, SR. and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Lynn Wortham (plaintiff) appeals from the judgment dismissing her lawsuit against Casino Queen, Inc., (defendant) for lack of personal jurisdiction over defendant.
We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties and find no error of law. An extended opinion reciting detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).