Case Name: INVESTMENT ASSOCIATES v. SUMMIT ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL.
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 2012-01-12
Citations: 303 Conn. 921
Docket Number: SC 18910
Parties: INVESTMENT ASSOCIATES v. SUMMIT ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL.
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 303
Pages: 921–922

Head Matter:
INVESTMENT ASSOCIATES v. SUMMIT ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL.

Opinion:
The petition by the defendant Joseph D. Lancia for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 132 Conn. App. 192 (AC 32227), is granted, limited to the following issues:
Decided January 12, 2012
The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18910.
Proloy K. Das and Bernard F. Gaffney, in support of the petition.
Pasquale Young, in opposition.
"1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that General Statutes § 52-598 (c) is procedural in nature, and, therefore, may be applied retroactively?
"2. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court had subject matter jurisdiction over the plaintiffs 2009 motion to revive?
"3. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court had personal jurisdiction over the defendant for purposes of adjudicating the plaintiffs 2009 motion to revive?"