Case Name: CHESTERFIELD FENCE CO., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Nataleen PADFIELD, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-07-06
Citations: 138 S.W.3d 759
Docket Number: No. ED 83198
Parties: CHESTERFIELD FENCE CO., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Nataleen PADFIELD, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 138
Pages: 759–760

Head Matter:
CHESTERFIELD FENCE CO., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Nataleen PADFIELD, Defendant/Respondent.
No. ED 83198.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
July 6, 2004.
John S. Steward, Geoffrey S. Meyer-kord, Meyerkord & Steward, L.L.C., St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Thomas A. Federer, Ian C. Simmons, Federer & Federer, P.C., St. Charles, MO, for respondent.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff appeals from the trial court's judgment entered after a bench trial in defendant's favor. The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).