Case Name: MAGICAL CRUISE COMPANY LIMITED, etc., Petitioner, v. Dorothy TURK, Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2013-01-11
Citations: 114 So. 3d 233
Docket Number: No. 5D12-1835
Parties: MAGICAL CRUISE COMPANY LIMITED, etc., Petitioner, v. Dorothy TURK, Respondent.
Judges: LAWSON and BERGER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 114
Pages: 233–235

Head Matter:
MAGICAL CRUISE COMPANY LIMITED, etc., Petitioner, v. Dorothy TURK, Respondent.
No. 5D12-1835.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Jan. 11, 2013.
Charles T. Wells, Adam M. Bird and Ted L. Shinkle, of GrayRobinson, P.A., Melbourne, for Petitioner.
Shannon McLin Carlyle and Christopher V. Carlyle, of the Carlyle Appellate Law Firm, The Villages, and Edward S. Schwartz, of Gerson & Schwartz, P.A., Miami, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Magical Cruise Company Limited d/b/a Disney Cruise Line ("DCL"), seeks a writ of certiorari to quash an order requiring it to turn over work product to plaintiff. Because the trial court made no findings to justify ordering the production of work product, we grant the writ and quash the order. See Dismas Charities, Inc. v. Dabbs, 795 So.2d 1038 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (granting certiorari and quashing order requiring production of documents, where order failed to make any findings in support of denial of petitioner's work product objections). As the court did in Dabbs, we remand with instructions to the trial court to reconsider the work product objections and to support any order requiring production of the documents with appropriate findings. Id. at 1039.
CERTIORARI GRANTED.
LAWSON and BERGER, JJ., concur.
PALMER, J., dissents with opinion.