Case Name: Bobby E. HAZEL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James N. CROSS, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-10-22
Citations: 334 F. App'x 546
Docket Number: No. 09-7436
Parties: Bobby E. HAZEL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James N. CROSS, Warden, Respondent—Appellee.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 334
Pages: 546–547

Head Matter:
Bobby E. HAZEL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James N. CROSS, Warden, Respondent—Appellee.
No. 09-7436.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 15, 2009.
Decided: Oct. 22, 2009.
Bobby E. Hazel, Appellant Pro Se.
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Bobby Hazel, a federal inmate, appeals the district court's orders and judgment adopting the magistrate judge's recommendations and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) habeas corpus petition and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See Hazel v. Cross, No. 1:09-cv-00004-IMK, 2009 WL 1921185 (N.D.W. Va. July 2, 2009); 2009 WL 2176041 (July 20, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.