Case Name: COLE v. JENKINS
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1923-09-24
Citations: 1 Ohio Law Abs. 733
Docket Number: No. 4545
Parties: COLE v. JENKINS
Judges: 
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 1
Pages: 733–733

Head Matter:
No. 747
COLE v. JENKINS
Ohio Appeals, 8th District, Cuyahoga County
No. 4545.
September 24, 1923
'his opinion has not been published except in Abstract.
5A. BILLS, NOTES AND CHECKS.
Judgment on a note made to show to and appease tockholders, then to be cancelled, was without consideration — Judgment on reversed.
Attorneys — A. H. Fiebach, for defendant; J. B. workin, for plaintiff.

Opinion:
¡ULLIVAN, J.
Epitomized Opinion
Suit on a note for $3,300 which was executed by efendant and delivered to plaintiff's decedent for re purpose of exhibiting to and appeasing certain tackholders of a corporation. No consideration ^¡sed from the payee to the maker. The defense as no consideration and an agreement of eancella-on between maker and payee. The Common Pleas ireeted a verdict for plaintiff. Defendant prose-rted error to this court. Held:
Since there was no consideration for the note sub-tantial justice has not been done. The judgment i against the weight of the evidence and contrary > law. Reversed and remanded.