Case Name: Cheryl Crook et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. E. I. duPont de Nemours Co., Inc., et al., Respondents-Appellants, et al., Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1995-06-09
Citations: 216 A.D.2d 927
Docket Number: 
Parties: Cheryl Crook et al., Appellants-Respondents, v E. I. duPont de Nemours Co., Inc., et al., Respondents-Appellants, et al., Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 216
Pages: 927–928

Head Matter:
Cheryl Crook et al., Appellants-Respondents, v E. I. duPont de Nemours Co., Inc., et al., Respondents-Appellants, et al., Defendant.
[629 NYS2d 703]

Opinion:
Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: With respect to the motions of defendants for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, we affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court. With respect to the preclusion motions, we affirm insofar as the court granted the motion of PPG Industries, Inc., for a final order of preclusion. We modify the order on appeal, however, by granting a final order of preclusion with respect to the motion of Auto Finishers Supply Company, Inc., unless plaintiffs serve answers to interrogatories and discovery demands upon it within 10 days of service of a copy of the order of this Court with notice of entry. (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Reagan, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Denman, P. J., Pine, Wesley, Balio and Boehm, JJ.