Case Name: Mildred ZULFER, Appellant, v. In re ESTATE of Clarence Martin ZULFER, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1975-03-20
Citations: 310 So. 2d 56
Docket Number: No. W-202
Parties: Mildred ZULFER, Appellant, v. In re ESTATE of Clarence Martin ZULFER, Appellee.
Judges: RAWLS, C. J., and BOYER and Mc-CORD, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 310
Pages: 56–56

Head Matter:
Mildred ZULFER, Appellant, v. In re ESTATE of Clarence Martin ZULFER, Appellee.
No. W-202.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
March 20, 1975.
Walter E. Foster, Jr., Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Charles R. Burnett, of Wells & Burnett, Daytona Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
An order of a trial judge reaches an appellate court clothed with a presumption of correctness. The record on appeal in the case sub judice does not reveal sufficient facts to overcome that presumption. The appellant having failed to demonstrate prejudicial error, the order appealed is
Affirmed.
RAWLS, C. J., and BOYER and Mc-CORD, JJ., concur.