Case Name: Tommy NOBLES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1992-09-22
Citations: 837 S.W.2d 46
Docket Number: No. 61476
Parties: Tommy NOBLES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 837
Pages: 46–47

Head Matter:
Tommy NOBLES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. 61476.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Sept. 22, 1992.
Elizabeth Haines, St. Louis, for mov-ant/appellant.
William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent/respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant appeals following dismissal of his Rule 24.035 motion as untimely filed. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the rea sons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).