Case Name: Thomas C. BURCHER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SIEMANS AUTOMOTIVE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-02-25
Citations: 367 F. App'x 416
Docket Number: No. 09-1840
Parties: Thomas C. BURCHER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. SIEMANS AUTOMOTIVE CORPORATION, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before KING, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 367
Pages: 416–417

Head Matter:
Thomas C. BURCHER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. SIEMANS AUTOMOTIVE CORPORATION, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 09-1840.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 11, 2010.
Decided: Feb. 25, 2010.
Christopher D. Supino, Adam H. Lotkin, Norris, St. Clair & Lotkin, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellant. Shepherd D. Wainger, Erin Q. Ashcroft, McGuirewoods, LLP, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before KING, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Thomas C. Burcher appeals the district court's order granting Appellee's motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Burcher v. Siemans Automotive Corp., No. 4:08-cv-00106-JBF (E.D. Va. June 29, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.