Case Name: Wayne Nelson CUNDAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES OF WASHINGTON STATE, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-02-11
Citations: 312 F. App'x 58
Docket Number: No. 07-35925
Parties: Wayne Nelson CUNDAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES OF WASHINGTON STATE, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before: O’SCANNLAIN, BYBEE, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 312
Pages: 58–58

Head Matter:
Wayne Nelson CUNDAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES OF WASHINGTON STATE, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 07-35925.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 13, 2009.
Filed Feb. 11, 2009.
Wayne Nelson Cunday, Spokane, WA, pro se.
Heidi S. Holland, Esquire, Kelly E. Konkright, Esquire, Office of the Attorney General, Spokane, WA, for Defendant-Ap-pellee.
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, BYBEE, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Wayne Nelson Cunday appeals pro se from the district court's order dismissing his amended complaint for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion dismissal of an amended complaint for failure to comply with Rule 8. McHenry v. Renne, 84 F.3d 1172, 1177 (9th Cir.1996). We affirm.
The district court correctly determined that no claim was stated by the amended complaint, which consists of one sentence: "Plaintiff alleges: 1. Violates my CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, IS ARBITRARY AND OR CAPRICIOUS." Cunday v. Dep't of Soc. & Health Servs., No. 07-cv-00046-LRS, slip op. at 1 (E.D. Wash. June 25, 2007).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.