Case Name: Gary M. WOOTEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-08-26
Citations: 113 S.W.3d 259
Docket Number: No. WD 61840
Parties: Gary M. WOOTEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before PAUL M. SPINDEN, P. J., THOMAS H. NEWTON and RONALD R. HOLLIGER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 113
Pages: 259–259

Head Matter:
Gary M. WOOTEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 61840.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Aug. 26, 2003.
John M. Sehilmoeller, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, III, Richard A. Starnes, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before PAUL M. SPINDEN, P. J., THOMAS H. NEWTON and RONALD R. HOLLIGER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Mr. Gary M. Wooten appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion on the basis that the motion court erred by finding that he had failed to prove ineffective assistance of counsel.
For the reasons set forth in the memorandum provided to the parties, the denial of Mr. Wooten's post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).