Case Name: Antwon D. NELSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-03-12
Citations: 69 S.W.3d 925
Docket Number: No. ED 79368
Parties: Antwon D. NELSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 69
Pages: 925–925

Head Matter:
Antwon D. NELSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 79368.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
March 12, 2002.
Raymund J. Capelovitch, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Richard A. Starnes, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant Antwon Nelson appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing. He contends his trial attorney provided ineffective assistance by failing to seek a dismissal on double jeopardy grounds.
Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to the Mo. R.Crim. P.2001, unless otherwise indicated.