Case Name: Central Funding Company, Respondent, v. Theodore L. Deglin, Appellant, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 1.); Theodore L. Deglin, Appellant, v. Central Funding Company, Respondent. (Action No. 2.)
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1979-12-19
Citations: 48 N.Y.2d 964
Docket Number: 
Parties: Central Funding Company, Respondent, v Theodore L. Deglin, Appellant, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 1.) Theodore L. Deglin, Appellant, v Central Funding Company, Respondent. (Action No. 2.)
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 48
Pages: 964–966

Head Matter:
Central Funding Company, Respondent, v Theodore L. Deglin, Appellant, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 1.) Theodore L. Deglin, Appellant, v Central Funding Company, Respondent. (Action No. 2.)
Argued November 21, 1979;
decided December 19, 1979
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Elliot Schnapp and Louis A. Mangone for appellant.
Isaac Anolic for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order, insofar as it dismissed the injunction action, affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in so much of the memorandum of the Appellate Division as relates to the injunction action (67 AD2d 673). Appeal dismissed, without costs, insofar as it is taken from the remaining portions of the Appellate Division order dealing with the foreclosure action upon the ground that those portions of the Appellate Division order do not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.