Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Darius SUMPTER, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2013-10-01
Citations: 410 S.W.3d 712
Docket Number: No. ED 98896
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Darius SUMPTER, Appellant.
Judges: Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., KURT S. ODENWALD, J., and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 410
Pages: 712–713

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Darius SUMPTER, Appellant.
No. ED 98896.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Oct. 1, 2013.
Craig A. Johnston, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Joseph E. Buchheim, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., KURT S. ODENWALD, J., and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Darius Sumpter ("Defendant") appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County convicting him of one count of first-degree attempted robbery, in violation of section 564.011, one count of first-degree assault, in violation of section 565.050, and two counts of armed criminal action, in violation of section 571.015. In his only point on appeal, Defendant contends that the trial court abused its discretion in overruling his Motion for a New Trial based on newly discovered evidence.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).