Case Name: FRANCIS E. ROBERTS, Appellant, v. STATE, Respondent
Court: Arizona Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Arizona
Decision Date: 1921-01-26
Citations: 22 Ariz. 134
Docket Number: Criminal No. 499
Parties: FRANCIS E. ROBERTS, Appellant, v. STATE, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Arizona Reports
Volume: 22
Pages: 134–134

Head Matter:
[Criminal No. 499.
Filed January 26, 1921.]
[193 Pac. 748.]
FRANCIS E. ROBERTS, Appellant, v. STATE, Respondent.
APPEALofrom a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Maricopa. R. C. Stanford, Judge.
Affirmed.
Mr. Thomas J. Croaff, for Appellant.
The Attorney General of the State and the County Attorney of Maricopa County, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellant was tried and convicted of rape, and appeals. There has been no appearance of counsel in behalf of the appellant in this court and no brief filed. The cause was submitted on the record by the Attorney General. Notwithstanding this failure of duty on the part of the appellant, we have "examined the entire record carefully and thoroughly, but fail to find any reversible error. The proceedings seem to have been regular in all particulars. The appeal is clearly frivolous. The judgment will be affirmed.