Case Name: William Brunner and Prank Brunner, Respondents, v. Diogenes Brewing Company and Prank Fooshkill, Appellants, Impleaded with Ignatz Berger, Respondent, and
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1917-03
Citations: 177 A.D. 927
Docket Number: 
Parties: William Brunner and Prank Brunner, Respondents, v. Diogenes Brewing Company and Prank Fooshkill, Appellants, Impleaded with Ignatz Berger, Respondent, and
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 177
Pages: 927–927

Head Matter:
William Brunner and Prank Brunner, Respondents, v. Diogenes Brewing Company and Prank Fooshkill, Appellants, Impleaded with Ignatz Berger, Respondent, and

Opinion:
Others.—Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. But in substitution of the 21st finding of fact we find as follows: As against the plaintiffs, the tenant or any other person had no right to assign the certificate, or the right to abandon traffic pursuant thereto from the plaintiffs' premises during the continuance of the certificate and the lease. No opinion. Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ.