Case Name: IN RE: Mustafa MUHAMMAD Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-08-10
Citations: 694 F. App'x 212
Docket Number: No. 17-1764
Parties: IN RE: Mustafa MUHAMMAD Petitioner.
Judges: Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 694
Pages: 212–213

Head Matter:
IN RE: Mustafa MUHAMMAD Petitioner.
No. 17-1764
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: August 8, 2017
Decided: August 10, 2017
Mustafa Muhammad, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Mustafa Muhammad petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his motion for new trial. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED