Case Name: KATKEVICH v. GOODMAN
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1926-08-05
Citations: 4 Ohio Law Abs. 740
Docket Number: No. 20047
Parties: KATKEVICH v. GOODMAN
Judges: 
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 4
Pages: 740–740

Head Matter:
KATKEVICH v. GOODMAN
No. 20047.
Supreme Court
Dock. Aug. 5, 1926;
4 Abs. 541.
Attorneys — Wilt & Yoder for Katkevich; Beckerman & Felsman for Goodman; all of Cleveland.

Opinion:
Katkevich contends in the Supreme Court that where a common owner of two city lots .conveys one of them, a servient estate, with full covenants of warranty, and later conveys the other, there cannot be an easement or reservation by implication of a right of way over the rear of said servient estate, of ingress and egress to rear of other lot because owner abuts street and no such necessity therefor exists.