Case Name: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William AILLS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-09-19
Citations: 144 F. App'x 667
Docket Number: No. 04-30442
Parties: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William AILLS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: REINHARDT, RYMER and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 144
Pages: 667–668

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William AILLS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 04-30442.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 12, 2005.
Decided Sept. 19, 2005.
U.S. Attorney, USYA—Office of the U.S. Attorney, Yakima, WA, for PlaintiffAppellee.
Nicholas W. Marchi, Esq., Kennewicik, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: REINHARDT, RYMER and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
William Aills appeals his 63-month sentence imposed after his guilty plea to possession of a firearm by a prohibited person, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we remand.
Because appellant was sentenced under the then-mandatory Sentencing Guidelines, and we cannot reliably determine from the record whether the sentence imposed would have been materially different had the district court known that the Guidelines were advisory, we remand to the sentencing court to answer that question, and to proceed pursuant to United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez, 419 F.3d 906 (9th Cir. 2005) (extending Ameline's limited remand procedure to cases involving non-constitutional Booker error).
REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.