Case Name: Kim-ho Siva YAM, Appellant, v. Daniel DEHOYOS and Fred L. Krompitz, Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-11-23
Citations: 7 S.W.3d 548
Docket Number: No. ED 75385
Parties: Kim-ho Siva YAM, Appellant, v. Daniel DEHOYOS and Fred L. Krompitz, Respondents.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J., PAUL J. SIMON, J., JAMES R. DOWD, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 7
Pages: 548–549

Head Matter:
Kim-ho Siva YAM, Appellant, v. Daniel DEHOYOS and Fred L. Krompitz, Respondents.
No. ED 75385.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Nov. 23, 1999.
William F. Whealen, Jr., St. Louis, for appellant.
Charles A. Seigel, III, Michael A. Wolff, Seigel & Wolff, P.C., St. Louis, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J., PAUL J. SIMON, J., JAMES R. DOWD, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Kim-Ho Siva Yam ("landlord"), appeals from the judgment of the circuit court finding in favor of respondents, Daniel Dehoyos and Fred L. Krom-pitz ("tenants"), on landlord's petition for breach of contract and waste. We determine that the judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. Rule 84.16(b)(1). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).