Case Name: Audrel Jack WATSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harold CLARKE, Director Virginia Dept. of Corrections; Warden Wright, Warden-Lawrenceville Corrections Center; Ms. Goode, Medical Administrator; Ms. Hightower, Director of Nursing; G. Bowles, Dr., Dentist; MS. Morelle, Dental Assistant; Unknown Nurse #1; Unknown Nurse #2, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-11-21
Citations: 670 F. App'x 800
Docket Number: No. 16-6524
Parties: Audrel Jack WATSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harold CLARKE, Director Virginia Dept. of Corrections; Warden Wright, Warden-Lawrenceville Corrections Center; Ms. Goode, Medical Administrator; Ms. Hightower, Director of Nursing; G. Bowles, Dr., Dentist; MS. Morelle, Dental Assistant; Unknown Nurse #1; Unknown Nurse #2, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 670
Pages: 800–801

Head Matter:
Audrel Jack WATSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harold CLARKE, Director Virginia Dept. of Corrections; Warden Wright, Warden-Lawrenceville Corrections Center; Ms. Goode, Medical Administrator; Ms. Hightower, Director of Nursing; G. Bowles, Dr., Dentist; MS. Morelle, Dental Assistant; Unknown Nurse #1; Unknown Nurse #2, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-6524
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: October 31, 2016
Decided: November 21, 2016
Audrel Jack Watson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Michael Gordon Matheson, Thompson McMullan PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Ap-pellee.
Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Audrel Jack Watson, Jr., appeals the district court's orders dismissing several Defendants under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012), denying reconsideration, and granting Defendant Bowles' motion for summary judgment in Watson's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Watson v. Clarke, No. 1:14-cv-01315-GBL-MSN (E.D. Va. filed June 2, 2015, & entered June 3, 2015; July 1, 2015; Mar. 24, 2016). We deny Watson's motion for transcripts at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED