Case Name: Susan Carol BISHOP, Appellant, v. WESTERN SURETY COMPANY; Jennifer Clark Williams; George Meyers; Greg Melton, Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-05-05
Citations: 178 F. App'x 622
Docket Number: No. 05-2372
Parties: Susan Carol BISHOP, Appellant, v. WESTERN SURETY COMPANY; Jennifer Clark Williams; George Meyers; Greg Melton, Appellees.
Judges: Before RILEY, MAGILL, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 178
Pages: 622–622

Head Matter:
Susan Carol BISHOP, Appellant, v. WESTERN SURETY COMPANY; Jennifer Clark Williams; George Meyers; Greg Melton, Appellees.
No. 05-2372.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: May 2, 2006.
Decided: May 5, 2006.
Susan Carol Bishop, Doniphan, MO, pro se.
James S. Kreamer, Baker & Sterchi, Kansas City, MO, Brian J. Massimino, Caroline M. Tinsley, Baker & Sterchi, D. Keith Henson, James J. Zych, Paule & Camazine, St. Louis, MO, for Appellees.
Before RILEY, MAGILL, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
[UNPUBLISHED]
PER CURIAM.
Susan Bishop (Bishop) appeals the district court's Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) dismissal of her civil complaint. Having conducted de novo review of the dismissal, and having accepted the facts in the complaint as true and construing them in Bishop's favor, see Springdale Educ. Ass'n v. Springdale Sch. Dist, 133 F.3d 649, 651 (8th Cir.1998), we find the district court's analysis to be thorough and well-reasoned, and we reject Bishop's arguments for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Henry E. Autrey, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.