Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Patrick D. LOMAS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-12-17
Citations: 501 F. App'x 320
Docket Number: No. 12-30610
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Patrick D. LOMAS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before DAVIS, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 501
Pages: 320–321

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Patrick D. LOMAS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-30610
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 17, 2012.
Helina S. Dayries, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Robert William Piedrahita, Esq., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Baton Rouge, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Rebecca Louise Hudsmith, Esq., Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Patrick D. Lomas, Pollock, LA, pro se.
Before DAVIS, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Patrick D. Lomas has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Lomas has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.