Case Name: Edward E. STROUPE, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RADIO SHACK; Tandy Corporation; Transportation Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-06-14
Citations: 133 F. App'x 895
Docket Number: No. 05-1307
Parties: Edward E. STROUPE, Jr., Plaintiff—Appellant, v. RADIO SHACK; Tandy Corporation; Transportation Insurance Company, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 133
Pages: 895–895

Head Matter:
Edward E. STROUPE, Jr., Plaintiff—Appellant, v. RADIO SHACK; Tandy Corporation; Transportation Insurance Company, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 05-1307.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 9, 2005.
Decided: June 14, 2005.
Edward E. Stroupe, Jr., Appellant pro se.
Cameron Scott Bell, Penn, Stuart & Eskridge, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Edward E. Stroupe, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying relief on his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Stroupe v. Radio Shack, No. CA-05-13-1 (W.D.Va. Mar. 2, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED