Case Name: ZAMORE et al. v. GOLDBLATT et al.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1953-02-05
Citations: 201 F.2d 738
Docket Number: No. 153, Docket 22557
Parties: ZAMORE et al. v. GOLDBLATT et al.
Judges: Before SWAN, Chief Judge, and CLARK and FRANK, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 201
Pages: 738–739

Head Matter:
ZAMORE et al. v. GOLDBLATT et al.
No. 153, Docket 22557.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued Jan. 8, 1953.
Decided Feb. 5, 1953.
George J. Rudnick, Brooklyn, N. Y., for appellants.
Max Schwartz, Brooklyn, N. Y., for appellee.
Before SWAN, Chief Judge, and CLARK and FRANK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The first question, although neither party considered it in the briefs, is as to the appealability of the order. City of Morgantown v. Royal Ins. Co., Ltd., 337 U.S. 254, 69 S.Ct. 1067, 93 L.Ed. 1347, is flat against appealability. So appellants' attorney has admitted in his letter to the court submitted after the argument. This letter asks us to treat the appeal as a petition for mandamus. In Magnetic Engineering & Mfg. Co. v. Dings Mgf. Co., 2 Cir., 178 F.2d 866 at page 869, we said: "In this circuit we have twice refused to accept an appeal as a substitute for a petition for mandamus, even when that remedy was applicable ; and we shall abide by that ruling."
Appeal dismissed.