Case Name: TIMBER CREEK SEWER COMPANY, Appellant, v. Norman Bradley BABCOCK, Trustee under the Norman Bradley Babcock Declaration of Trust, Respondent, Donna Nash, Collector of Revenue of Platte County, Missouri, Defendant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-02-22
Citations: 162 S.W.3d 98
Docket Number: No. WD 63514
Parties: TIMBER CREEK SEWER COMPANY, Appellant, v. Norman Bradley BABCOCK, Trustee under the Norman Bradley Babcock Declaration of Trust, Respondent, Donna Nash, Collector of Revenue of Platte County, Missouri, Defendant.
Judges: Before RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Presiding Judge, PATRICIA BRECKENRIDGE, Judge, and JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 162
Pages: 98–98

Head Matter:
TIMBER CREEK SEWER COMPANY, Appellant, v. Norman Bradley BABCOCK, Trustee under the Norman Bradley Babcock Declaration of Trust, Respondent, Donna Nash, Collector of Revenue of Platte County, Missouri, Defendant.
No. WD 63514.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Feb. 22, 2005.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 29, 2005.
Application for Transfer Denied May 31, 2005.
Zel Martin Fischer, Rock Port, for Appellant.
Steven E. Mauer, Kansas City, for Respondent.
Before RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Presiding Judge, PATRICIA BRECKENRIDGE, Judge, and JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
Timber Creek Sewer Company ("Timber Creek") appeals the judgment of the trial court denying Timber Creek's request to condemn property held by Norman Bab-cock for the purpose of building a sewer line to serve a newly constructed residential subdivision.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no prec-edential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).