Case Name: The State ex rel. Chrysler Motors Corporation, Appellant, v. Mayfield, Admr., et al., Appellees
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1992-09-02
Citations: 64 Ohio St. 3d 505
Docket Number: No. 91-766
Parties: The State ex rel. Chrysler Motors Corporation, Appellant, v. Mayfield, Admr., et al., Appellees.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 64
Pages: 505–506

Head Matter:
The State ex rel. Chrysler Motors Corporation, Appellant, v. Mayfield, Admr., et al., Appellees.
[Cite as State ex rel. Chrysler Motors Corp. v. Mayfield (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 505.]
(No. 91-766
Submitted May 12, 1992
Decided September 2, 1992.)
Mansour, Gavin, Gerlack & Manos Co., L.P.A., Jeffrey M. Embleton and Robert JS'. Blackham, for appellant.
Lee I. Fisher, Attorney General, and Jeffery W. Clark, for appellees.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Subsequent to the decision below and the filing of briefs before this court, Brady v. Safety-Kleen Corp. (1991), 61 Ohio St.3d 624, 576 N.E.2d 722, was decided. That decision invalidated R.C. 4121.80 in its entirety, negating any right to reimbursement of settlement money and attorney fees in this case.
For this reason, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Wright, J., concurs in judgment only.
H. Brown, J., not participating.