Case Name: Arthur SMITH, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE Of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2011-11-15
Citations: 352 S.W.3d 676
Docket Number: No. ED 95065
Parties: Arthur SMITH, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE Of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before: CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, Jr., J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 352
Pages: 676–677

Head Matter:
Arthur SMITH, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE Of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 95065.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Nov. 15, 2011.
Jo Ann Rotermund, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., John M. Reeves, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before: CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, Jr., J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Arthur Smith (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).