Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee, v. Patricia Rae FRUETEL, Petitioner-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-05-20
Citations: 34 F. App'x 929
Docket Number: No. 02-6023
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee, v. Patricia Rae FRUETEL, Petitioner-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 34
Pages: 929–929

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee, v. Patricia Rae FRUETEL, Petitioner-Appellant.
No. 02-6023.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 29, 2002.
Decided May 20, 2002.
Patricia Rae Fruetel, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Patricia Rae Fruetel appeals the district court's order denying her petition to modify the terms of her supervised release pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 3583(e)(1) (West 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Fruetel, No. CR-91-70 (E.D.Va. Nov. 26, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.