Case Name: Julia A. Stevens, appellee, v. Joseph W. Naylor et al., Impleaded with Marguerite Rand, appellant
Court: Nebraska Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Nebraska
Decision Date: 1905-12-20
Citations: 75 Neb. 325
Docket Number: No. 14,045
Parties: Julia A. Stevens, appellee, v. Joseph W. Naylor et al., Impleaded with Marguerite Rand, appellant.
Judges: Letton and Oldham, CO., concur.
Reporter: Nebraska Reports
Volume: 75
Pages: 325–326

Head Matter:
Julia A. Stevens, appellee, v. Joseph W. Naylor et al., Impleaded with Marguerite Rand, appellant.
Filed December 20, 1905.
No. 14,045.
A notice of a judicial sale of lands must be published for at least thirty days next preceding the date of sale and must appear in all the regular issues of the paper during that period.
Appeal from the district court for Custer county: Bruno O. Hostetler, Judge.
Reversed.
O. L. Gutterson, for appellant.
R. A. Moore and James Ledioich, contra.

Opinion:
Ames, C.
This is an appeal from an order of confirmation of a sale under a decree of mortgage foreclosure. The objection is Avith reference to the publication of the notice of sale. It Avas published four times consecutively in a Aveekly ne/wspaper, the first insertion being on the 7th day of May, and the fourth on the 4th day of June, but the date specified in the notice for the sale and on which the latter took place Avas the 13th day of June, so that between -the last publication and the date of the sale there was a regular issue of the paper, to Avit, on the 11th day of June, Avhich did not contain a copy of the notice. We think the case is ruled by Lawson v. Gibson, 18 Neb. 137. That case holds, in effect, that the notice must be published for at least 30. days preceding the date of sale and must appear in all the regular issues of the paper during that period. State v. Cherry County, 58 Neb. 734.
We recommend that the order appealed from be reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
Letton and Oldham, CO., concur.
By the Court: For the reasons stated in the foregoing opinion, it is ordered that the order of the district court be reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
Reversed.