Case Name: Louise M. OBERKIRCH, Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG, a municipal corporation, and Maas Brothers, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1957-05-29
Citations: 95 So. 2d 519
Docket Number: 
Parties: Louise M. OBERKIRCH, Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG, a municipal corporation, and Maas Brothers, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.
Judges: TERRELL, C. J., and THOMAS and ROBERTS, JJ., and ALLEN, Associate Justice, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 95
Pages: 519–519

Head Matter:
Louise M. OBERKIRCH, Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG, a municipal corporation, and Maas Brothers, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.
Supreme Court of Florida, Special Division A.
May 29, 1957.
Ed W. Harris and William E. Allison, St. Petersburg, for appellant.
Lewis T. Wray, Harry I. Young, Frank D. McDevitt and Carl R. Linn, St. Peters-burg, for City of St. Petersburg.
Macfarlane, Ferguson, Allison & Kelly and David J. Kadyk, Tampa, for Maas Brothers, Inc., appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellees to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to 31 F.S.A. Rule 38 of the rules of this court and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;
It is accordingly Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is
Affirmed.
TERRELL, C. J., and THOMAS and ROBERTS, JJ., and ALLEN, Associate Justice, concur.