Case Name: Curtis D. SHULER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John N. VAUGHN, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-08-05
Citations: 390 F. App'x 234
Docket Number: No. 10-6228
Parties: Curtis D. SHULER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John N. VAUGHN, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 390
Pages: 234–235

Head Matter:
Curtis D. SHULER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John N. VAUGHN, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 10-6228.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 27, 2010.
Decided: Aug. 5, 2010.
Curtis D. Shuler, Appellant Pro Se. James Philip Allen, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Ap-pellee.
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Curtis D. Shuler appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Shuler v. Vaughn, No. 5:08-ct-03088-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 15, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.