Case Name: Timothy BARR, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-01-18
Citations: 14 S.W.3d 148
Docket Number: No. ED 76026
Parties: Timothy BARR, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 14
Pages: 148–148

Head Matter:
Timothy BARR, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 76026.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Jan. 18, 2000.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Feb. 22, 2000.
Application for Transfer Denied April 25, 2000.
Emmett D. Queener, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Karen Pope Butler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Timothy Barr (Movant) appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without a hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would serve no prece-dential or jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).