Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Sterling EDWARDS, Defendant/Appellant; Sterling EDWARDS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1997-04-08
Citations: 943 S.W.2d 338
Docket Number: Nos. 68406, 70483
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Sterling EDWARDS, Defendant/Appellant. Sterling EDWARDS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 943
Pages: 338–338

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Sterling EDWARDS, Defendant/Appellant. Sterling EDWARDS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 68406, 70483.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
April 8, 1997.
Robert E. Steele, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for defendant/appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Gregory L. Barnes, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
After the defendant was convicted of attempted forcible rape, § 566.030, RSMo 1994, and armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo 1994, he was sentenced by the court as a persistent offender to consecutive terms of twenty five and ten years. He filed a motion under Rule 29.15 which was overruled. He appeals, but raises no points of error relating to the 29.15 motion.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).