Case Name: STATE of Louisiana, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edwin Troy ARDOIN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1984-11-07
Citations: 458 So. 2d 1015
Docket Number: No. CR83-1149
Parties: STATE of Louisiana, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edwin Troy ARDOIN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before FORET, DOUCET and KNOLL, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 458
Pages: 1015–1016

Head Matter:
STATE of Louisiana, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edwin Troy ARDOIN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. CR83-1149.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.
Nov. 7, 1984.
Edward J. Lopez, Opelousas, for defendant-appellant.
Morgan J. Goudeau, III, Donald Richard, Asst. Dist. Atty., Opelousas, for plaintiff-appellee.
Before FORET, DOUCET and KNOLL, JJ.

Opinion:
DOUCET, Judge.
The defendant, Edwin Troy Ardoin, was charged by bill of information with simple burglary, in violation of La.R.S. 14:62. On September 20, 1983, the defendant entered a plea of guilty to the charge of simple burglary. On October 21, 1983, the defendant was sentenced to serve a term of six years at hard labor. Defendant appeals urging in his one assignment of error that the sentence imposed is excessive.
Although defendant perfected one assignment of error into the record, the assignment of error has not been briefed, consequently, it is considered abandoned. State v. Joseph, 425 So.2d 1261 (La.1983). This case will only be reviewed for errors patent on the face of the record. In accord with the mandate of La.C.Cr.P. art. 920, we have inspected the face of the record for errors patent. We find no error. We affirm defendant's conviction and sentence.
AFFIRMED.