Case Name: Teresa M. VINE, Petitioner v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, STATE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2009-03-27
Citations: 969 A.2d 1175
Docket Number: 
Parties: Teresa M. VINE, Petitioner v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, STATE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 969
Pages: 1175–1175

Head Matter:
Teresa M. VINE, Petitioner v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, STATE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
March 27, 2009.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 27th day of March, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is as follows:
Did the Commonwealth Court err in holding that Petitioner had to demonstrate either that SERS did not act in good faith or that SERS had reasonable cause to question the validity of the power of attorney and apparent authority in order for Petitioner to prevail?