Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Reynaldo Clemente GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-08-19
Citations: 72 F. App'x 710
Docket Number: No. 02-50254; D.C. No. CR-01-00031-RJT
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Reynaldo Clemente GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 72
Pages: 710–711

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Reynaldo Clemente GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-50254. D.C. No. CR-01-00031-RJT.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 11, 2003.
Decided Aug. 19, 2003.
Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, HAWKINS and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Reynaldo Clemente Garcia appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 70-month sen tence imposed for distributing methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a). Clemente Garcia's attorney has filed a brief and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Clemente Garcia has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Our review of the Anders brief and our independent review of the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no issues requiring farther review. Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.