Case Name: Rosa KAUFMAN, Appellant, v. Adele RUBIN et al., d/b/a Versailles Hotel, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1966-02-22
Citations: 183 So. 2d 284
Docket Number: No. 65-514
Parties: Rosa KAUFMAN, Appellant, v. Adele RUBIN et al., d/b/a Versailles Hotel, Appellees.
Judges: Before TILLMAN PEARSON, BARK-DULL and SWANN, JT.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 183
Pages: 284–285

Head Matter:
Rosa KAUFMAN, Appellant, v. Adele RUBIN et al., d/b/a Versailles Hotel, Appellees.
No. 65-514.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
Feb. 22, 1966.
Leonard Sussman, Miami, for appellant.
I. Stanley Levine, Roger G. Welcher, Miami, Eli Breger, No. Miami Beach, for appellees.
Before TILLMAN PEARSON, BARK-DULL and SWANN, JT.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellant, who was the plaintiff in the trial court and suffered an adverse jury verdict in an action for a fall in ap-pellee's hotel, presents two points. Each point alleges a procedural error.
We do not determine whether the points present error because it is conclusively apparent from the record that no prejudicial error has been shown. The cause was fully tried, and the appellant was able to present to the jury each contention that she puts forward in the case. Therefore, this judgment is affirmed pursuant to the rule that an appellate court will not reverse a judgment based on substantial evi dence where the record does not reveal that the errors resulted in a miscarriage of justice. Symmes v. Prairie Pebble Phosphate Co., 69 Fla. 4, 67 So. 228 (1915); Victor Hotel Owners v. Sperling, Fla.App.1958, 104 So.2d 120.
Affirmed.