Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alonzo N. WOOTEN, a/k/a Cut Wooten, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-01-28
Citations: 262 F. App'x 532
Docket Number: No. 07-7392
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Alonzo N. WOOTEN, a/k/a Cut Wooten, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 262
Pages: 532–532

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Alonzo N. WOOTEN, a/k/a Cut Wooten, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 07-7392.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 17, 2008.
Decided: Jan. 28, 2008.
Alonzo N. Wooten, Appellant Pro Se. Timothy Richard Murphy, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Alonzo N. Wooten appeals the district court's order denying his motion for specific performance of his plea agreement. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Wooten, No. 4:99-cv-00006-JBF (E.D.Va. Aug. 22, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.