Case Name: Thomas F. Stroud, appellant, v. Calamus Irrigation District, appellee: Alex W. Draver et al., Interveners, appellees
Court: Nebraska Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Nebraska
Decision Date: 1931-02-20
Citations: 120 Neb. 719
Docket Number: No. 27418
Parties: Thomas F. Stroud, appellant, v. Calamus Irrigation District, appellee: Alex W. Draver et al., Interveners, appellees.
Judges: Heard before Goss, C. J., Rose, Dean, Eberly and Day, JJ.
Reporter: Nebraska Reports
Volume: 120
Pages: 719–720

Head Matter:
Thomas F. Stroud, appellant, v. Calamus Irrigation District, appellee: Alex W. Draver et al., Interveners, appellees.
Filed February 20, 1931.
No. 27418.
Frank H. Woodland, for appellant.
Guy Laverty, E. M. White and Davis & Vogeltanz, contra.
Heard before Goss, C. J., Rose, Dean, Eberly and Day, JJ.

Opinion:
Dean, J.
The question presented here for determination is decided in Elliott v. Calamus Irrigation District, ante, p. 714. By stipulation of the parties the three actions, namely, Elliott v. Calamus Irrigation District, Cameron v. Calamus Irrigation District, and Stroud v. Calamus Irrigation District, were combined and tried as one case. Our decision in the Elliott case therefore controls in the present case. It follows that the judgment herein must be and it hereby is
Affirmed.