Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Silvestre Jaime SOLORIO, also known as Jaime Cornejo, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-05-29
Citations: 605 F. App'x 422
Docket Number: No. 14-40552
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Silvestre Jaime SOLORIO, also known as Jaime Cornejo, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 605
Pages: 422–422

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Silvestre Jaime SOLORIO, also known as Jaime Cornejo, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 14-40552
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
May 29, 2015.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, H. Michael Sokolow, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defen-danh-Appellant.
Silvestre Jaime Solorio, Post, TX, pro se.
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Silvestre Jaime Solorio has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Solo-rio has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no 'nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.