Case Name: James Dalton, Appellant, v. Harry W. McMahan, et al., Appellees
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1930-02-03
Citations: 99 Fla. 265
Docket Number: 
Parties: James Dalton, Appellant, v. Harry W. McMahan, et al., Appellees.
Judges: ■
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 99
Pages: 265–266

Head Matter:
James Dalton, Appellant, v. Harry W. McMahan, et al., Appellees.
Division B.
Decision filed February 3, 1930.
Kurtz & Reed and Jordan B. Peck, for Appellant;
McCaskill & McCaskill, for Appellees.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been sub.mitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Cpurt that the said decree of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.