Case Name: David A. JAMES and Jennifer James, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant/Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2018-11-06
Citations: 567 S.W.3d 663
Docket Number: ED 106592
Parties: David A. JAMES and Jennifer James, Plaintiffs/Appellants,
v.
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 567
Pages: 663–663

Head Matter:
David A. JAMES and Jennifer James, Plaintiffs/Appellants,
v.
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant/Respondent.
ED 106592
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Filed: November 6, 2018
Application for Transfer Denied March 5, 2019
David C. Knieriem, 7711 Bonhomme, Suite 850, Clayton, MO 63105, Joseph P. Rice III, Austin D. Crowe, Co-Counsel, 160 S. Broadview, 4th Floor, Cape Girardeau, MO 63703, For Plaintiffs/Appellants.
Scott C. Harper, Aaron I. Mandel, 34 N. Meramec Avenue, 5th Floor, St. Louis, MO 63105, For Defendant/Respondent.
Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
David A. James and Jennifer James (Appellants) appeal the trial court's judgment granting summary judgment in favor of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm). Appellants' sole point on appeal claims the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of State Farm because Jennifer James was an insured for purposes of coverage under State Farm's motor vehicle liability insurance policy. We affirm.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).