Case Name: In the Matter of the Application of Rae Ranzal, Appellant, for an Order Directing the Taking of the Depositions of Charles C. Hood and Others, Respondents, for the Purpose of Framing a Complaint in an Action about to Be Brought in the Supreme Court, Queens County, in Which Rae Ranzal Is the Expected Plaintiff and the Said Other Parties Are the Expected Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1935-07
Citations: 245 A.D. 821
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Application of Rae Ranzal, Appellant, for an Order Directing the Taking of the Depositions of Charles C. Hood and Others, Respondents, for the Purpose of Framing a Complaint in an Action about to Be Brought in the Supreme Court, Queens County, in Which Rae Ranzal Is the Expected Plaintiff and the Said Other Parties Are the Expected Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 245
Pages: 821–821

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Application of Rae Ranzal, Appellant, for an Order Directing the Taking of the Depositions of Charles C. Hood and Others, Respondents, for the Purpose of Framing a Complaint in an Action about to Be Brought in the Supreme Court, Queens County, in Which Rae Ranzal Is the Expected Plaintiff and the Said Other Parties Are the Expected Defendants.

Opinion:
Order denying petitioner's motion for leave to examine the defendants for the purpose of enabling her to frame the complaint affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur.