Case Name: Donald A. MAUL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2015-12-15
Citations: 477 S.W.3d 708
Docket Number: No. ED 102677
Parties: Donald A. MAUL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J. and Angela T. Quigless, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 477
Pages: 708–708

Head Matter:
Donald A. MAUL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 102677
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Filed: December 15, 2015
Matthew William Huckeby, 1010 Market St., Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO. 63101, for appellant.
State of Missouri, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO. 65102, for respondent.
Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J. and Angela T. Quigless, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Donald A. Maul appeals from the motion court's denial of his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find the motion court did not clearly err in denying Mov-ant's motion without an evidentiary hearing. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2015).
. All rule references are to Missouri Supreme Court Rules (2015) unless otherwise indicated.