Case Name: STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Salvatore F. CAROLLO, a/k/a Sam; Santo John Carollo; Edward Koh; Mfichael Emil Bazsuly; Rickey Owen Dawes; Max Margulis; and Vincent Salvatore Loscalzo, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-11-03
Citations: 664 So. 2d 1024
Docket Number: No. 94-03886
Parties: STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Salvatore F. CAROLLO, a/k/a Sam; Santo John Carollo; Edward Koh; Mfichael Emil Bazsuly; Rickey Owen Dawes; Max Margulis; and Vincent Salvatore Loscalzo, Appellees.
Judges: THREADGILL, C.J., and PARKER and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 664
Pages: 1024–1025

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Salvatore F. CAROLLO, a/k/a Sam; Santo John Carollo; Edward Koh; Mfichael Emil Bazsuly; Rickey Owen Dawes; Max Margulis; and Vincent Salvatore Loscalzo, Appellees.
No. 94-03886.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Nov. 3, 1995.
Rehearing Denied Dec. 12, 1995.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Patricia E. Davenport, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellant.
Rochelle A. Reback, Tampa, for Appellee Max Margulis.
Angelo M. Ferlita of Ferlita, Nutter & Rosello, P.A., Tampa, for Appellees Salvatore F. Carollo and Santo John Carollo.
Norman S. Cannella of Norman S. Cannel-la, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee Edward Koh.
Ellis Rexwood Curry, IV, Tampa, for Ap-pellee Michael Emil Bazsuly.
Ellis R. Faught, Jr. of Ellis R. Faught, Jr., P.A., Brandon, for Appellee Rickey Owen Dawes.
Joseph H. Ficarrotta, Tampa, for Appellee Vincent Salvatore Loscalzo.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The state appeals the trial court's order dismissing as insufficient and vague all counts of the information filed against Salvatore F. Carollo, Santo John Carollo, Edward Koh, Michael Emil Bazsuly, Rickey Owen Dawes, Max Margulis, and Vincent Salvatore Loscalzo. The fifty-five counts contained in the information the state filed involved charges of racketeering, conspiracy to commit racketeering, organized scheme to defraud, securities fraud, sale of unregistered securities, grand theft, and sale of securities by an unregistered dealer.
We have reviewed the information, the statement of particulars, and supplemental statement of particulars the state filed. We conclude that the information follows the statutes the defendants allegedly violated and, together with the statements of particulars, reasonably informs the defendants of the actions with which they are charged. See State v. Greco, 479 So.2d 786 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985), ajfd sub nom. Falzone v. State, 500 So.2d 1337 (Fla.1987). Accordingly, the trial court erred in dismissing the fifty-five counts contained in the information.
Reversed and remanded.
THREADGILL, C.J., and PARKER and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.