Case Name: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Ronald J. KAKAS, Janet Frasca, Julie Ann Goode, and Diego Rodriguez, Respondents
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-10-22
Citations: 568 So. 2d 126
Docket Number: No. 90-0582
Parties: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Ronald J. KAKAS, Janet Frasca, Julie Ann Goode, and Diego Rodriguez, Respondents.
Judges: DOWNEY, GLICKSTEIN and STONE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 568
Pages: 126–127

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Ronald J. KAKAS, Janet Frasca, Julie Ann Goode, and Diego Rodriguez, Respondents.
No. 90-0582.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Oct. 22, 1990.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and John Tiedemann, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for petitioner.
Michael Salnick, West Palm Beach, for respondent Ronald J. Kakas.
Craig R. Wilson, North Palm Beach, for respondent Janet Frasca.
Steven H. Goldfarb, Boynton Beach, for respondent Julie Ann Goode.
Robert Friedman, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for respondent Diego Rodriguez.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have sua sponte withdrawn our previously issued opinion in this case and substituted this opinion in its place, to correct the caption and identify all party respondents.
The state's petition for writ of certiorari is granted. We quash the trial court order compelling disclosure and remand the cause to the trial court to conduct an in-camera hearing to determine whether the testimony of the confidential informant would be helpful to the defense. State v. Williams, 369 So.2d 416 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). We note the absence of direct testimony of entrapment in the record.
DOWNEY, GLICKSTEIN and STONE, JJ., concur.