Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wendell Antonio JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-06-28
Citations: 667 F. App'x 58
Docket Number: No. 16-6144
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wendell Antonio JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 667
Pages: 58–58

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wendell Antonio JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-6144
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 23, 2016
Decided: June 28, 2016
Wendell Antonio Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Barrett Hudson, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Wendell Antonio Johnson seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as a second or successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion filed without authorization. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Johnson's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, Johnson has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED