Case Name: Bobby G. COLLIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.; Bank of America, N.A.; Substitute Trustee Services, Inc., Trustee Services; The Hutchens Law Firm, f/k/a Hutchens, Senter, Kellam, & Pettit, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-12-21
Citations: 627 F. App'x 190
Docket Number: No. 15-2165
Parties: Bobby G. COLLIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.; Bank of America, N.A.; Substitute Trustee Services, Inc., Trustee Services; The Hutchens Law Firm, f/k/a Hutchens, Senter, Kellam, & Pettit, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 627
Pages: 190–190

Head Matter:
Bobby G. COLLIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.; Bank of America, N.A.; Substitute Trustee Services, Inc., Trustee Services; The Hutchens Law Firm, f/k/a Hutchens, Senter, Kellam, & Pettit, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15-2165.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 17, 2015.
Decided: Dec. 21, 2015.
Bobby G. Collier, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Ashley Muckenfuss, McGuire-woods, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina; Claire Louise Collins, Hilton Terry Hutch-ens, Jr., Hutchens, Senter, Kellam & Petit, PA, Fayetteville, North Carolina, for Apr pellees.
Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Bobby G. Collier appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Collier's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, Collier has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. Accordingly, although we grant Collier's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.