Case Name: David FRYE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-01-16
Citations: 802 So. 2d 1223
Docket Number: No. 3D01-2107
Parties: David FRYE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before JORGENSON, GODERICH and FLETCHER, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 802
Pages: 1223–1223

Head Matter:
David FRYE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D01-2107.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan. 16, 2002.
David Frye, in proper person.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before JORGENSON, GODERICH and FLETCHER, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
As the State properly concedes, the appellant's motion to clarify illegal sentence should be granted. On remand, the trial court is directed to clarify the following: that the re-sentencing order is nunc pro tunc to the original sentencing date of May 18, 1996; that the sentence should include the sentence for count 7, the severed unlawful possession of a firearm conviction; that all sentences are to run concurrent; and that the appellant did not receive a habitual violent offender sentence as to count 3, the burglary conviction that was overturned on appeal.
Remanded with directions.