Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arthur Lee HAIRSTON, Sr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-01-22
Citations: 505 F. App'x 272
Docket Number: No. 12-7536
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arthur Lee HAIRSTON, Sr., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 505
Pages: 272–272

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arthur Lee HAIRSTON, Sr., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-7536.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 17, 2013.
Decided: Jan. 22, 2013.
Arthur Lee Hairston, Sr., Appellant pro se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Arthur Lee Hairston, Sr., appeals the district court's order denying his requests for correction of his presentence report and for identification of a contact pursuant to the Second Chance Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hairston, No. 3:00-cr-00024-JPB-JES-1 (N.D.W.Va., Aug. 30, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.