Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. William R. CAPERS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-06-05
Citations: 46 S.W.3d 657
Docket Number: No. ED 78018
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. William R. CAPERS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., PAUL J. SIMON and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 46
Pages: 657–658

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. William R. CAPERS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. ED 78018.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
June 5, 2001.
Kent Denzel, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Linda Lemke, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., PAUL J. SIMON and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant, William R. Capers, appeals the judgment entered upon his conviction for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, Section 195.211 RSMo. (2000), for which he was sentenced as a prior drug offender to seventeen years' imprisonment. Defendant argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress: (1) evidence obtained from his home pursuant to a search in violation of the Fourth Amendment; and (2) statements made while in custody without the benefit of the Miranda warning. Defendant also claims the evidence and statements should not have been admitted into evidence over objection at trial.
We have reviewed the parties' briefs and the record on appeal. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).