Case Name: Leslie ELWOOD-GARZA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ANTOLIK, Special Agent; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-01-27
Citations: 164 F. App'x 637
Docket Number: No. 05-55939
Parties: Leslie ELWOOD-GARZA, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. ANTOLIK, Special Agent; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before: T.G. NELSON, SILVERMAN and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 164
Pages: 637–638

Head Matter:
Leslie ELWOOD-GARZA, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. ANTOLIK, Special Agent; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
No. 05-55939.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 23, 2006.
Decided Jan. 27, 2006.
Leslie Elwood-Garza, San Diego, CA, pro se.
Before: T.G. NELSON, SILVERMAN and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
The Clerk shall file the following: appellant's opening brief received August 3, 2005, appellant's motion for appointment of counsel received August 3, 2005, appellant's amended proof of service received August 5, 2005, and appellant's letter received September 26, 2005.
A review of the record, the opening brief, and appellant's response to the October 19, 2005 order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.