Case Name: SIMON WOLK, COMPLAINANT-APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM WIDLANSKY, ET ALS., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1949-02-28
Citations: 1 N.J. 491
Docket Number: 
Parties: SIMON WOLK, COMPLAINANT-APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM WIDLANSKY, ET ALS., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 1
Pages: 491–492

Head Matter:
SIMON WOLK, COMPLAINANT-APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM WIDLANSKY, ET ALS., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Argued February 21, 1949
Decided February 28, 1949.
Mr. Samuel H. Nelson argued the cause for the complainant-appellant (Mr. Herman H. Anekstein, attorney).
Mir. Stephen V. R. Strong argued tHe cause for the defendants-respondents (Messrs. Strong & Strong, attorneys)

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree under review will be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Vice Chancellor Jayne in the former Court of Chancery.
For affirmance: Chief Justice Vanderbilt and Justices Case, Heher, Wacheneeld, Burling, and Ackerson—6.
For reversal: None.