Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Celia Haynes EDWARDS, a/k/a Tina Hawks, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-06-30
Citations: 605 F. App'x 222
Docket Number: No. 15-6623
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Celia Haynes EDWARDS, a/k/a Tina Hawks, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before GREGORY, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 605
Pages: 222–222

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Celia Haynes EDWARDS, a/k/a Tina Hawks, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-6623.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 25, 2015.
Decided: June 30, 2015.
Celia Haynes Edwards, Appellant Pro Se. Roy Franklin Evans, Jr., Office of the United States Attorney, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before GREGORY, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Celia Haynes Edwards appeals the district court's order denying her motion for reconsideration of the court's sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012), and to Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir.2010) (holding that district court does not have authority to reconsider prior order on § 3582 motion). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's denial of relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.