Case Name: The Troy Carriage Works, Appellant, v. Herbert H. Muxlow, Respondent
Court: New York City Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1896-01
Citations: 15 Misc. 696
Docket Number: 
Parties: The Troy Carriage Works, Appellant, v. Herbert H. Muxlow, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 15
Pages: 696–696

Head Matter:
The Troy Carriage Works, Appellant, v. Herbert H. Muxlow, Respondent.
Appeal from order.
The following is the opinion at Special Term:
Botty, J. The proceedings were adjourned, not for the continuance of the examination of any surety which had been commenced, but to enable the defendant to procure the attendance of his sureties, or substitute new sureties, and have them present for examination.
Motion is, therefore, denied, but the new sureties must attend for justification on two days’ notice, after service of notice of demand for such justification on plaintiff’s, attorney.
Thompson & Allen, for appellant.
W. H. Newman, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The order appealed from is affirmed, with costs, upon the opinion of the Special Term justice who made said order.
Present: Fitzsimons and Conlan, JJ.
Order affirmed, with costs.