Case Name: Bonnie BANNISTER, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. PULASKI FINANCIAL CORP. d/b/a Pulaski Bank, and Pulaski Service Corp., Defendants/Respondents, and S & P Properties, Inc., Defendant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2010-01-26
Citations: 302 S.W.3d 248
Docket Number: No. ED 92413
Parties: Bonnie BANNISTER, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. PULASKI FINANCIAL CORP. d/b/a Pulaski Bank, and Pulaski Service Corp., Defendants/Respondents, and S & P Properties, Inc., Defendant.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 302
Pages: 248–249

Head Matter:
Bonnie BANNISTER, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. PULASKI FINANCIAL CORP. d/b/a Pulaski Bank, and Pulaski Service Corp., Defendants/Respondents, and S & P Properties, Inc., Defendant.
No. ED 92413.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Jan. 26, 2010.
Donald R. Carmody, Teresa Dale Pupil-lo, Meghan M. Lamping, Carmody McDonald P.C., St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Andrew G. Neill, Kappel, Neill & Wolff, L.L.C., St. Louis, MO, for respondents.
Angela Loehr, Gallop, Johnson & Newman, Clayton, MO, for defendant.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff, Bonnie Bannister, appeals from the entry of summary judgment in favor of defendants, Pulaski Financial Corp. and Pulaski Service Corp. No error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).