Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stephen Clifford FERGUSON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-03-19
Citations: 59 F. App'x 942
Docket Number: No. 02-30117; D.C. No. CR-00-00192-JCC
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Stephen Clifford FERGUSON, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 59
Pages: 942–942

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Stephen Clifford FERGUSON, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 02-30117.
D.C. No. CR-00-00192-JCC.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 10, 2003.
Decided March 19, 2003.
Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN and T. G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, Ferguson's request for oral argument and appointment of counsel is denied.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Stephen Clifford Ferguson appeals pro se the district court's denial of his Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33 motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U. S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion by finding that the supposed new evidence would not probably lead to an acquittal because it did not affect Ferguson's lack of standing to challenge the search of his house. See United States v. Kulczyk, 931 F.2d 542, 548-49 (9th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Ferguson's Rule 33 motion.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.