Case Name: Morris Pollatschek et al., Respondents, V. Matilda E. Goodwin, Appellant
Court: New York City Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1896-04
Citations: 16 Misc. 686
Docket Number: 
Parties: Morris Pollatschek et al., Respondents, v. Matilda E. Goodwin, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 16
Pages: 686–687

Head Matter:
CITY COURT OF NEW YORK—GENERAL TERM,
APRIL, 1896.
Morris Pollatschek et al., Respondents, v. Matilda E. Goodwin, Appellant.
' Appeal from judgment in favor of plaintiffs.
Theodore L. Frothingham, for appellant. ■ ■
Hoffman & Hoffman, for respondents.

Opinion:
McCarthy, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs for broker's commission against the seller on an exchange of certain real estate and other properties. ' '
The judge's charge being omitted, we must accept that the case was fairly and properly submitted to the jury.
It was a question of fact, and we cannot disturb their verdict unless for some error of law.
After a careful examination of the points suggested by the appellant we do not find any substantial error requiring a reversal.
Judgment must, therefore, be affirmed, with costs.
Van Wyck, Ch. J., and Fitzsimons, J., concur.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.