Case Name: JAMES W. FOWLER COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORCHEM, INC., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-09-30
Citations: 76 F. App'x 219
Docket Number: No. 02-35240; D.C. No. CV-01-01424-HU (AJB)
Parties: JAMES W. FOWLER COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORCHEM, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 76
Pages: 219–219

Head Matter:
JAMES W. FOWLER COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORCHEM, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 02-35240.
D.C. No. CV-01-01424-HU (AJB).
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Sept. 12, 2003.
Decided Sept. 30, 2003.
Jeffrey B. Wilkinson, Stewart, Sokol & Gray, Jon M. Egan, Brayton Purcell, Portland, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Jeffrey K. Hanson, Joseph A. Yazbeck, Jr., Allen & O’Halloran LLP, Portland, OR, for Defendani>-Appe]lee.
Before ALDISERT, LEAVY, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED for the reasons set forth in the findings and recommendations of Magistrate Judge Hubei, as adopted by the district court on February 19, 2002. The several issues raised by appellant on appeal were fully reviewed by the Magistrate Judge. The district court did not err.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.