Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. JOHN SCHWEITER, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2006-09-27
Citations: 208 Or. App. 337
Docket Number: 03FE1370MS; A126756
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. JOHN SCHWEITER, Appellant.
Judges: Before Schuman, Presiding Judge, and Ortega and Rosenblum, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 208
Pages: 337–338

Head Matter:
Submitted on record and brief August 18,
reversed and remanded with instructions to enter a judgment reflecting four separate findings of guilt merging into one conviction, and for resentencing; otherwise affirmed September 27, 2006
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. JOHN SCHWEITER, Appellant.
03FE1370MS; A126756
144 P3d 1006
Peter A. Ozanne, Executive Director, Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, Legal Services Division, and Rebecca Duncan, Chief Deputy Public Defender, Office of Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Jonathan H. Fussner, Attorney-In-Charge, Criminal Appeals Unit, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Schuman, Presiding Judge, and Ortega and Rosenblum, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant was convicted of attempted assault in the fourth degree, ORS 163.160(3)(c), based on a single assault committed in the presence of four child witnesses. The trial court entered four convictions. Defendant contends that, under State v. Glaspey, 337 Or 558, 100 P3d. 730 (2004), only one conviction was justified because the child witnesses are not "victims." The state concedes that Glaspey controls the outcome of this case and that the trial court erred by not merging the separate convictions into a single one. We agree and accept the concession.
Reversed and remanded with instructions to enter a judgment reflecting four separate findings of guilt merging into one conviction, and for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.