Case Name: Baker v. Sacks, Warden
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1961-05-31
Citations: 172 Ohio St. 293
Docket Number: No. 36881
Parties: Baker v. Sacks, Warden.
Judges: Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Radcliee and O’Neill, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, New Service
Volume: 172
Pages: 293–293

Head Matter:
Baker v. Sacks, Warden.
(No. 36881
Decided May 31, 1961.)
Mr. James L. Balter, in propria persona.
Mr. Mark McElroy, attorney general, and Mr. Aubrey A. Wendt, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Petitioner had an adequate remedy by way of appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence to review the alleged irregularities and errors of which he here complains and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in habeas corpus.
Petitioner remanded to custody.
Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Radcliee and O'Neill, JJ., concur.
Radcliee, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Herbert, J.