Case Name: Mrs. Wilhelmina COLE, Individually and on Behalf of her two minor daughters, Marie Cole and Georgia Mae Cole v. LOGAN CAB COMPANY and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company (Consolidated with: No. 5341-Mrs. Gladys Powell, Individually and on behalf of her minor daughter, Louise Powell v. Logan Cab Company and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company)
Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1973-03-07
Citations: 276 So. 2d 325
Docket Number: No. 5342
Parties: Mrs. Wilhelmina COLE, Individually and on Behalf of her two minor daughters, Marie Cole and Georgia Mae Cole v. LOGAN CAB COMPANY and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company (Consolidated with: No. 5341—Mrs. Gladys Powell, Individually and on behalf of her minor daughter, Louise Powell v. Logan Cab Company and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company).
Judges: Before REDMANN, LEMMON and GULOTTA, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 276
Pages: 325–326

Head Matter:
Mrs. Wilhelmina COLE, Individually and on Behalf of her two minor daughters, Marie Cole and Georgia Mae Cole v. LOGAN CAB COMPANY and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company (Consolidated with: No. 5341—Mrs. Gladys Powell, Individually and on behalf of her minor daughter, Louise Powell v. Logan Cab Company and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company).
No. 5342.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.
March 7, 1973.
Rehearing Denied April 3, 1973.
Writ Refused June 11, 1973.
John P. Cosentino, Steven R. Plotkin, New Orleans, for plaintiffs-appellees.
Robert J. Pitard, New Orleans, for defendants-appellants.
Before REDMANN, LEMMON and GULOTTA, JJ.
Gulotta, J., voted to grant.

Opinion:
LEMMON, Judge.
This suit was consolidated for trial with that of Mrs. Glodys Powell, Individually and on behalf of her minor daughter, Louise Powell v. Logan Cab Company and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, bearing docket No. 5341 in this court, 276 So.2d 324, decided this day.
For the reasons assigned in that case, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and it is now ordered that plaintiffs suit be dismissed at her costs.
Reversed and rendered.
GULOTTA, J., dissents with written reasons, 276 So.2d 326.