Case Name: RICHARD R. MILLER, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. PETER GREENWALT, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1900-06-18
Citations: 64 N.J.L. 722
Docket Number: 
Parties: RICHARD R. MILLER, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. PETER GREENWALT, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 64
Pages: 722–722

Head Matter:
RICHARD R. MILLER, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. PETER GREENWALT, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Argued March 14, 1900
Decided June 18, 1900.
On error to the Supreme Court.
For the plaintiff in error, John W. Wescott and John J. Crandall.
For the defendant in error, Edward G. C. Bleakly.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment brought up by this writ of error must be affirmed, for the reasons given by Mr. Justice Collins in his opinion in the Supreme Court. See ante p. 197.
For affirmance—Depue (Chief Justice), Van Syckel, Gummere, Lippincott, Ludlow, Bogert, Hendrickson, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees. 10.
For reversal—Magie (Chancellor). 1.