Case Name: In the Matter of the Claim of Esther Fried et al. against Quinlan, Inc., et al., Respondents. State Industrial Board, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1926-01-22
Citations: 242 N.Y. 496
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Claim of Esther Fried et al. against Quinlan, Inc., et al., Respondents. State Industrial Board, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 242
Pages: 496–497

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Claim of Esther Fried et al. against Quinlan, Inc., et al., Respondents. State Industrial Board, Appellant.
(Argued January 11, 1926;
decided January 22, 1926.)
Albert Ottihger, Attorney-General {E. C. Aiken of counsel), for appellant.
Richard F. Weeks and Frederick Mellor for respondents.

Opinion:
Order- of Appellate Division reversed and award of State Industrial Board affirmed, with costs m this court and Appellate Division on authority of Heitz v. Ruppert (218 N. Y. 148); Knocks v. Metal Packing Co. (231 N. Y. 78), and Rydeen v. Monarch Furniture Co. (240 N. Y. 295).
Concur: Cardozo, Pound, Crane and Lehman, JJ. Dissenting: His cock, Ch. J., McLaughlin and An-JJ.