Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leon McCOLLUM, a/k/a Leon McCullough, a/k/a Black, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-01-21
Citations: 361 F. App'x 496
Docket Number: No. 09-7626
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leon McCOLLUM, a/k/a Leon McCullough, a/k/a Black, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 361
Pages: 496–496

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leon McCOLLUM, a/k/a Leon McCullough, a/k/a Black, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-7626.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 14, 2010.
Decided: Jan. 21, 2010.
Leon McCollum, Appellant Pro Se. Rose Mary Sheppard Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Leon McCollum appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. McCollum, No. 4:06-cr-00082-RBH-l (D.S.C. filed Aug. 11, 2009, entered Aug. 12, 2009). McCollum's challenge to the career offender enhancement cannot be addressed in a § 3582 motion. See United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247, 251-53 (4th Cir.) (holding that "proceedings under § 3582(c) do not constitute a full resentencing"), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 129 S.Ct. 240, 173 L.Ed.2d 1296 (2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.