Case Name: SIMMON v. YOUNG
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1919-12-23
Citations: 77 Okla. 203
Docket Number: No. 10027
Parties: SIMMON v. YOUNG.
Judges: KANE, PITCHFORD, HIGGINS, and BAILEY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 77
Pages: 203–204

Head Matter:
SIMMON v. YOUNG.
No. 10027
Opinion Filed Dec. 23, 1919.
Petition for Rehearing Denied Feb. 3, 1920.
Motion to File Second Petition for Rehearing Feb. 12, 1920.
(Syllabus by the Oourt.)
Appeal and Error — Frivolous Appeals — Dismissal.
Where upon examination of the record, petition in error, and motion to dismiss it appears that the appeal is manifestly frivolous and without merit, the same will be dismissed.
Error from District Court, Muskogee County ; R. P. deGraffenreid, Judge.
Action by Tandy C. Young against J. M. Simmon. Judgment for plaintiff for $3,000, and defendant brings error.
Dismissed.
S. H. Lattimore and Frank R. Applegate, for plaintiff in error.
Gibson & Hull, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
OWEN, C. J.
Tandy C. Young brought this action against J. M. Simmon, alleging, in substance, that Simmon employed him to sell an undivided interest in an oil lease for $5,000 net to Simmon, and in pursuance of this employment he procured a purchaser within the time mentioned, who was ready, willing, and able to purchase the interest, paying therefor the sum of $8,000, $3,000 of which amount was to be paid to Young as his commission, but Simmon failed and refused to accept the offer, and thereby became indebted to Young in the sum of $3,000.. Simmon answered by way of general denial, alleging also that he had canceled the employment prior to the performance by Young. The case ¿was tried to the court, without a jury; judgment rendered for Young in the sum of $3,000; from this judgment Simmon appeals.
Defendant in error filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for the reason the same is frivolous and brought for the purpose of delay only. To this motion no response has been made.
From an examination of the entire record, it appears no other judgment could have been rendered, and that the appeal is clearly frivolous, and it will, therefore, be dismissed. Greenless v. Beckett, 49 Okla. 135, 152 Pac. 349; Skirvin v. Goldstein, 40 Okla. 315, 137 Pac. 1177.
KANE, PITCHFORD, HIGGINS, and BAILEY, JJ., concur.