Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Randolph D. JACKSON, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-09-10
Citations: 248 F. App'x 765
Docket Number: No. 06-2863
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Randolph D. JACKSON, Appellant.
Judges: Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 248
Pages: 765–766

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Randolph D. JACKSON, Appellant.
No. 06-2863.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 5, 2007.
Filed: Sept. 10, 2007.
Larry C. Pace, Asst. Fed. Public Defender, Kansas City, MO (Raymond C. Conrad, Jr., Fed. Public Defender, on the brief), for appellant.
Kathleen D. Mahoney, Asst. U.S. Atty., Kansas City, MO, for appellee.
Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Randolph D. Jackson appeals the 188-month prison sentence the district court imposed after he pleaded guilty to aiding and abetting the possession of PCP with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B), and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Jackson's counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), arguing that the sentence is unreasonable.
We disagree. The district court considered Jackson's advisory Guidelines imprisonment range (188-235 months as a career offender) along with other relevant 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, and we find no abuse of discretion in the court's sentence determination. See United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 258-62, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005) (§ 3553(a) factors will guide reasonableness review); United States v. Haack, 403 F.3d 997, 1003-04 (8th Cir.2005) (defining ways in which abuse of discretion may occur).
Having reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we have found no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm, and we grant counsel's motion to withdraw.
. The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.