Case Name: JULIA RIBAUDO SENIOR SERVICES, Respondent v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE, Petitioner
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2008-04-03
Citations: 946 A.2d 638
Docket Number: 
Parties: JULIA RIBAUDO SENIOR SERVICES, Respondent v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE, Petitioner.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 946
Pages: 638–638

Head Matter:
JULIA RIBAUDO SENIOR SERVICES, Respondent v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE, Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
April 3, 2008.

Opinion:
AMENDED ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 3rd day of April 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:
Whether the Commonwealth Court erred in concluding that an administrative agency's notice that clearly advises the recipient of the effective date of the agency's action, but that does not specifically designate a "date of mailing," is insufficient to begin the appeal period? If the notice is sufficient, is the recipient entitled to an appeal nunc pro tunc?