Case Name: C. B. STENVALL, Appellant, v. George W. WILSON, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1961-11-22
Citations: 134 So. 2d 502
Docket Number: No. 61-189
Parties: C. B. STENVALL, Appellant, v. George W. WILSON, Appellee.
Judges: Before PEARSON, TILLMAN, C. J., and HORTON and CARROLL, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 134
Pages: 502–502

Head Matter:
C. B. STENVALL, Appellant, v. George W. WILSON, Appellee.
No. 61-189.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
Nov. 22, 1961.
Hagglund & Larson, Miami, for appellant.
Charles A. Gould, Jr., Miami, for appel-lee.
Before PEARSON, TILLMAN, C. J., and HORTON and CARROLL, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff appeals a final decree entered after a full trial. The burden of the appeal is that the chancellor should have found for the plaintiff upon his complaint for specific performance. It is apparent from the record that the chancellor found that although the plaintiff did notify the defendant of plaintiff's intention to exercise the option which is the subject matter of this suit, he did not within the time limited for the exercise of the option, or within a reasonable time after his notification, take affirmative action to bring about a closing. See Lack v. Robineau, D.C.S.D.Fla.1925, 9 F.2d 406; Martin v. Albee, 93 Fla. 941, 113 So. 415.
Affirmed.