Case Name: Tucker v. Lea et al.
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1950-02-16
Citations: 206 Ga. 538
Docket Number: No. 16939
Parties: Tucker v. Lea et al.
Judges: All the Justices concur, except Duckworth, C. J., who dissents. Head, J., concurs specially.
Reporter: Georgia Reports
Volume: 206
Pages: 538–539

Head Matter:
Tucker v. Lea et al.

Opinion:
Atkinson, Presiding Justice.
Under Code § 3-601, no suitor may prosecute two actions in the courts at the same time, for the same cause, and against the same party; and if such suits are commenced at different times, the pendency of the former shall be a good defense to the latter. The petition showing that another suit which involved the same subject-matter (Mrs. Tucker's answer in the nature of a cross-petition in Tucker v. American Surety Co. of N. Y., ante, 533), was pending at the time the present suit was filed, the court did not err in sustaining a general demurrer and in dismissing the action. See, in this connection, Bird v. Trapnell, 148 Ga. 301 (1) (96 S. E. 417); Cook v. State Highway Board, 162 Ga. 84 (3) (132 S. E. 902); Hines v. Moore, 168 Ga. 451 (8) (148 S. E. 162).
No. 16939.
February 16, 1950.
Randall Evans Jr., for plaintiff.
B. Lamar. Tillman, for defendants.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur, except Duckworth, C. J., who dissents. Head, J., concurs specially.