Case Name: Abdul-Aziz Rashid MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-01-23
Citations: 551 F. App'x 65
Docket Number: No. 13-7310
Parties: Abdul-Aziz Rashid MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 551
Pages: 65–66

Head Matter:
Abdul-Aziz Rashid MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 13-7310.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 21, 2014.
Decided: Jan. 23, 2014.
Abdul-Aziz Rashid Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se. Christina Ann Kelley, Bureau of Prisons, Butner, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Abdul-Aziz Rashid Muhammad appeals the district court's order denying reconsideration of the district court's previous order dismissing his complaint brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Muhammad v. United States, No. 5:ll-ct-03126-FL (E.D.N.C. Aug. 1, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately-presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
To the extent Muhammad seeks to appeal the underlying order dismissing his complaint, his appeal is timely only as to the denial of his motion for reconsideration, which is properly construed as a motion pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b). See Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(4)(A); see generally Dove v. CODESCO, 569 F.2d 807, 809 (4th Cir.1978).