Case Name: SELZ v. UNNA
Court: United States Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1866-07
Citations: 21 F. Cas. 1051
Docket Number: 
Parties: SELZ v. UNNA.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Cases
Volume: 21
Pages: 1051–1051

Head Matter:
Case No. 12,650.
SELZ v. UNNA.
[1 Biss. 521.]
Circuit Court, N. D. Illinois.
July Term. 1866.
Equity — Relief against‘Judgment at Law— Secret Agkeement — Fraud upon Coliti-gants — Contribution.
NOTE. This case was affirmed by the supreme court, in 6 Wall. [73 U. S.] 327, in an opinion closely following the reasoning and conclusions of the circuit judge, and as the facts are fully stated in the reported case, it is not deemed necessary to publish anything further here. [The opinion of the circuit, judge is nowhere reported.)
[Affirmed in 6 Wall. (73 U. S.) 327.]

Opinion:
BX THE COURT.
1. Where a judgment '.has been regularly entered against joint defendants, and some have paid their pro rata, • on a bill filed by others, setting up a secret .agreement between themselves and plaintiffs that if they would abandon the defense, plain- . tiffs would not call upon them for any part of any judgment they might recover, a court of equity will not grant relief. Such an agreement is a fraud upon their co-litigants, and will not be sustained.
2. Although, generally, contribution cannot • be enforced between wrong-doers, still this court will not interfere to assist some of them in escaping such part of the common burden ;as they are equitably bound to pay.
3. The marshal having collected part of the judgment from some of the defendants, will be permitted to collect the balance from the others, notwithstanding this secret agreement.
4.Although the assignee of a judgment takes it subject to all existing equities, yet such an agreement constitutes no defense against an assignee in good faith, without notice.