Case Name: Elbert A. WALTON, Jr., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. NORTHEAST AMBULANCE AND FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, Defendant/Respondent, and Anthony D. Gray and Johnson Gray, LLC, Third-Party Defendants/Respondents.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2018-04-24
Citations: 552 S.W.3d 718
Docket Number: No. ED 105728
Parties: Elbert A. WALTON, Jr., Plaintiff/Appellant,
v.
NORTHEAST AMBULANCE AND FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, Defendant/Respondent,
and
Anthony D. Gray and Johnson Gray, LLC, Third-Party Defendants/Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 552
Pages: 718–719

Head Matter:
Elbert A. WALTON, Jr., Plaintiff/Appellant,
v.
NORTHEAST AMBULANCE AND FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, Defendant/Respondent,
and
Anthony D. Gray and Johnson Gray, LLC, Third-Party Defendants/Respondents.
No. ED 105728
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Filed: April 24, 2018
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 30, 2018.
Application for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied August 21, 2018
Dedra M. Brock-Moore, 4601 State Street, Suite 100B-1, East St. Louis, IL 62205, For Appellant.
Richard K. Johnson, 319 N. Fourth Street, Suite 212, St. Louis, MO 63102, For Respondent Northeast Ambulance and Fire Protection District.
Gino F. Battisti, William S. Clark, 101 S. Hanley Road, Suite 600, St. Louis, MO 63105, For Respondents Anthony D. Gray and Johnson Gray, LLC.
Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Elbert A. Walton, Jr. (Appellant) appeals the trial court's summary judgment against him and in favor of Northeast Ambulance and Fire Protection District (the District), Anthony D. Gray (Gray), and Johnson Gray, LLC (Johnson Gray). Appellant also appeals from the trial court's denial of his motion to compel the District to arbitrate the parties' contract dispute and motion to disqualify Gray and Johnson Gray as defense counsel for the District. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court committed no error. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
The District's Motion to Dismiss Appeal is denied. Appellant's request for an award of attorney's fees for responding to the District's Motion to Dismiss is denied.