Case Name: Leslie LOMAX, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-10-03
Citations: 907 S.W.2d 333
Docket Number: No. 67674
Parties: Leslie LOMAX, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before REINHARD, P.J., KAROHL and WHITE, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 907
Pages: 333–333

Head Matter:
Leslie LOMAX, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 67674.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Oct. 3, 1995.
Robert E. Steele, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before REINHARD, P.J., KAROHL and WHITE, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
We affirm dismissal of defendant-movant Lomax's Rule 29.15 motion because it was filed out of time, Malone v. State, 798 S.W.2d 149, 151 (Mo. banc 1990) cert. denied 500 U.S. 929, 111 S.Ct. 2044, 114 L.Ed.2d 128 (1991), and was addressed to deficiencies of appellate counsel, matters not within the rule. Reuscher v. State, 887 S.W.2d 588, 591 (Mo. banc 1994).
We affirm.