Case Name: Drew C. HARTLEY, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2006-09-11
Citations: 939 So. 2d 136
Docket Number: No. 1D05-4118
Parties: Drew C. HARTLEY, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Respondent.
Judges: BARFIELD and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 939
Pages: 136–136

Head Matter:
Drew C. HARTLEY, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Respondent.
No. 1D05-4118.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Sept. 11, 2006.
Drew C. Hartley, pro se, Petitioner.
Charlie Crist, Attorney General, and Wendy Benner-Leon, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Opinion:
BROWNING, J.
The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits. The petitioner has not met his extraordinary burden to show that the circuit court — acting in its appellate capacity in reviewing the petitioner's challenge of an unfavorable institutional ruling after an inmate disciplinary hearing — violated a clearly established principle of law resulting in a gross miscarriage of justice. See Sheley v. Fla. Parole Comm'n, 703 So.2d 1202, 1206 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), approved, 720 So.2d 216 (Fla.1998); Combs v. State, 436 So.2d 93, 95-96 (Fla.1983); Doss v. Fla. Dep't of Corrs., 730 So.2d 316 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).
PETITION DENIED.
BARFIELD and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.