Case Name: Fashionette Dress Co., Inc., Proposed Plaintiff, Respondent, v. David Mintz, Proposed Defendant; "Mary" Friedman, First Name of Defendant Being Fictitious, True First Name of Defendant Being Unknown to Proposed Plaintiff, Proposed Defendant; Nettie Friedman, Mentioned as "Mary" Friedman, etc., Proposed Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1936-11-23
Citations: 249 A.D. 646
Docket Number: 
Parties: Fashionette Dress Co., Inc., Proposed Plaintiff, Respondent, v. David Mintz, Proposed Defendant; “Mary” Friedman, First Name of Defendant Being Fictitious, True First Name of Defendant Being Unknown to Proposed Plaintiff, Proposed Defendant; Nettie Friedman, Mentioned as “Mary” Friedman, etc., Proposed Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 249
Pages: 646–646

Head Matter:
Fashionette Dress Co., Inc., Proposed Plaintiff, Respondent, v. David Mintz, Proposed Defendant; “Mary” Friedman, First Name of Defendant Being Fictitious, True First Name of Defendant Being Unknown to Proposed Plaintiff, Proposed Defendant; Nettie Friedman, Mentioned as “Mary” Friedman, etc., Proposed Appellant.

Opinion:
Order denying the proposed defendant Friedman's motion to vacate an order directing her deposition be taken in order to enable the proposed plaintiff to frame a complaint affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements; the examination to proceed on five days' notice. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.