Case Name: Antonio CARDET, Appellant, v. Fernando RODRIGUEZ, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-11-06
Citations: 682 So. 2d 225
Docket Number: No. 96-654
Parties: Antonio CARDET, Appellant, v. Fernando RODRIGUEZ, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and COPE, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 682
Pages: 225–225

Head Matter:
Antonio CARDET, Appellant, v. Fernando RODRIGUEZ, Appellee.
No. 96-654.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 6, 1996.
Arnaldo Velez, Miami, for appellant.
James M. Fishman, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and COPE, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
"On a motion for summary judgment, it is settled that a trial court is not permitted to weigh material conflicting evidence or pass upon the credibility of the witnesses." Pita v. State Street Bank and Trust Co., 666 So.2d 268 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). Because the order under review rests on credibility determinations, we reverse the final summary judgment entered and remand this ease for further proceedings.
Reversed and remanded.