Case Name: STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Michael PRATT, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-11-06
Citations: 591 So. 2d 272
Docket Number: No. 90-1277
Parties: STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Michael PRATT, Appellee.
Judges: ANSTEAD, HERSEY and WARNER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 591
Pages: 272–273

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Michael PRATT, Appellee.
No. 90-1277.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Nov. 6, 1991.
On Motion for Rehearing Jan. 15, 1992.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James J. Carney, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Jeffrey L. Anderson, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We grant the motion for rehearing and vacate our order of December 24, 1990.
The state appeals from an order granting a motion to suppress physical evidence. The trial court based its determination, at least in part, on the Florida Supreme Court's decision in Bostick v. State, 554 So.2d 1153 (Fla.1989). That decision has been reversed by the United States Su preme Court in Florida v. Bostick, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2382, 115 L.Ed.2d 389 (1991). Accordingly, we reverse and remand to permit the trial court to make express findings of fact after applying the test mandated by Florida v. Bostick.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
ANSTEAD, HERSEY and WARNER, JJ., concur.