Case Name: Royal Mack SUMMERVILLE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1983-10-13
Citations: 441 So. 2d 1072
Docket Number: No. 61761
Parties: Royal Mack SUMMERVILLE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON and SHAW, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 441
Pages: 1072–1073

Head Matter:
Royal Mack SUMMERVILLE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 61761.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Oct. 13, 1983.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 12, 1984.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender and Tatjana Ostapoff, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for petitioner.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Marlyn J. Altman and Robert L. Bogen, Asst. Attys. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent.

Opinion:
EHRLICH, Justice.
Petitioner seeks review of a denial of habeas corpus. Summerville v. State, 408 So.2d 836 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution, based on conflict between the First District Court of Appeal, Carson v. Bishop, 378 So.2d 882 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979), and the Fourth Dis trict, State v. Sylvester, 401 So.2d 1123 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).
This case presents us with the same issue as Miller v. Toles, 442 So.2d 177 (Fla.1983), which issued today. For the reasons set forth in Miller, we grant the writ of habeas corpus and quash the opinion of the court below.
It is so ordered.
ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON and SHAW, JJ., concur.
ALDERMAN, C.J., dissents with an opinion, in which McDONALD, J., concurs.