Case Name: Willis C. WOODY, Jr., Appellant, v. Patricia Ann WOODY, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-01-29
Citations: 575 So. 2d 230
Docket Number: No. 90-2837
Parties: Willis C. WOODY, Jr., Appellant, v. Patricia Ann WOODY, Appellee.
Judges: SHIVERS, C.J., and WENTWORTH and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 575
Pages: 230–230

Head Matter:
Willis C. WOODY, Jr., Appellant, v. Patricia Ann WOODY, Appellee.
No. 90-2837.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jan. 29, 1991.
Michael A. Flowers of Chesser, Wingard, Barr, Whitney, Flowers & Fleet, Shalimar, for appellant.
Charles J. Kahn, Jr., of Levin, Middle-brooks, Mabie, Thomas, Mayes and Mitchell, P.A., Pensacola, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant has taken a timely appeal from a final order of dissolution of marriage. After filing of the initial brief, however, appellee moved this court for a remand, conceding that the order on appeal did not have sufficient findings of fact to withstand appellate review. See Kim v. Bradshaw, 569 So.2d 532 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Raehn v. Raehn, 557 So.2d 152 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Appellant has not timely responded to the motion and accordingly we reverse and remand the order here on appeal for entry of an amended final judgment setting forth findings of fact. Either or both parties may, of course, seek appl-late review of the amended final judgment by initiating a new appellate proceeding.
REVERSED.
SHIVERS, C.J., and WENTWORTH and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.