Case Name: Annie Westerman, Respondent, v. Charles Westerman et al., Defendants, and Michael Dietz et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1956-03-30
Citations: 1 A.D.2d 892
Docket Number: 
Parties: Annie Westerman, Respondent, v. Charles Westerman et al., Defendants, and Michael Dietz et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 1
Pages: 892–892

Head Matter:
Annie Westerman, Respondent, v. Charles Westerman et al., Defendants, and Michael Dietz et al., Appellants.

Opinion:
Appeal from an order denying appellants' motion to dismiss the amended complaint pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted. There is no present necessity for a declaratory judgment in an action to uphold an inchoate right of dower. (Buffington v. Mayper, 235 App. Div. 866.) Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur.