Case Name: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent, v. June M. ROBY-SPENCER, Petitioner
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2006-10-24
Citations: 590 Pa. 3
Docket Number: Appeal No. 288 MAL 2006
Parties: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent, v. June M. ROBY-SPENCER, Petitioner.
Judges: 
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 590
Pages: 3–3

Head Matter:
911 A.2d 503
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent, v. June M. ROBY-SPENCER, Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Oct. 24, 2006.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 24th day of October, 2006, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, limited to the following:
Whether the Superior Court erred in failing to evaluate the agreement to move for petitioner's admission into the ARD program as a specific performance of a contract type of action (non-prosecution agreement) and to decide the matter pursuant to the analysis set forth in Commonwealth v. Stipetich, 423 Pa.Super. 427, 621 A.2d 606 (1993), and Commonwealth v. Ginn, 402 Pa.Super. 405, 587 A.2d 314 (1991).