Case Name: Hal Asch, Respondent-Appellant, v. Dan Schoen, Doing Business as Faragut Carpet Co., Appellant-Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1954-03-15
Citations: 283 A.D. 806
Docket Number: 
Parties: Hal Asch, Respondent-Appellant, v. Dan Schoen, Doing Business as Faragut Carpet Co., Appellant-Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 283
Pages: 806–806

Head Matter:
Hal Asch, Respondent-Appellant, v. Dan Schoen, Doing Business as Faragut Carpet Co., Appellant-Respondent.

Opinion:
In an action to rescind a contract and to recover damages for breach of warranty, plaintiff elected on the trial to proceed in rescission. The jury rendered a verdict for $1,400 in plaintiff's favor, which the court set aside and ordered a new trial. Defendant appeals from so much of the order as grants a new trial and fails to dismiss the complaint. Plaintiff cross-appeals from so much of the order as sets aside the verdict and orders a new trial. Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Adel, Wenzel, Beldock and Murphy, JJ.