Case Name: Bertha Hoffman, respondent, v. Frederick Rauchmiller et al., appellants
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1925-10-19
Citations: 98 N.J. Eq. 692
Docket Number: 
Parties: Bertha Hoffman, respondent, v. Frederick Rauchmiller et al., appellants,
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 98
Pages: 692–692

Head Matter:
Bertha Hoffman, respondent, v. Frederick Rauchmiller et al., appellants,
[Argued May term, 1925,
Decided October 19th, 1925.]
Mr. Theodore G. Ilinderlang, for the appellants.
Messrs. LeWbach, Johnson & Ormond, for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Church.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, ,TJ. 14.
For reversal — None.