Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronnie Lee DUNN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-08-04
Citations: 330 F. App'x 424
Docket Number: No. 09-6228
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Ronnie Lee DUNN, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 330
Pages: 424–425

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Ronnie Lee DUNN, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 09-6228.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 30, 2009.
Decided: Aug. 4, 2009.
Ronnie Lee Dunn, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ronnie Lee Dunn appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion to reduce his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Dunn, No. 8:97-er-00761-GRA-l (D.S.C. Jan. 7, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.