Case Name: Louis Vitale et al. v. Michael Natalino et al.
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1984-07-31
Citations: 2 Conn. App. 345
Docket Number: 2919
Parties: Louis Vitale et al. v. Michael Natalino et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Appellate Reports
Volume: 2
Pages: 345–345

Head Matter:
Louis Vitale et al. v. Michael Natalino et al.
(2919)
Dannehy, C.P.J., Hull and Spallone, Js.
Submitted on briefs May 10
decision released July 31, 1984
Louis Vitale, pro se, the appellant (plaintiff), filed a brief.
Bruce L. Levin and Anthony V. Avallone filed a brief for the appellees (named defendant et al.).
Raymond B. Green filed a brief for the appellees (defendant Tobin & Levine et al.).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The plaintiff filed this appeal following a trial in which the jury found against the plaintiffs on each of the five counts in their complaint.
The parties did not appear for oral argument, but stipulated that the court may rule on the basis of the record and briefs. After a careful study of the record and briefs of those issues properly before this court, we conclude that there is no merit to the plaintiffs claims.
There is no error.
The original suit included both Louis Vitale and Andres Rodriguez as the plaintiffs. Rodriguez was nonsuited and failed to appeal the nonsuit. For the purposes of this appeal, Vitale is the sole plaintiff.
This appeal, originally filed in the Supreme Court, was transferred to this court. Public Acts, Spec. Sess., June, 1983, No. 83-29, § 2 (c).