Case Name: John M. Armstrong et al., Suing on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Stockholders Similarly Situated and on Behalf and in the Right of Canadian Javelin Limited, Respondents, and Milton Berman, Suing on Behalf of Himself and All Other Stockholders Similarly Situated and on Behalf and in the Right of Canadian Javelin Limited, et al., Appellants, et al., Plaintiffs, v. John C. Doyle et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1962-09-27
Citations: 12 N.Y.2d 663
Docket Number: 
Parties: John M. Armstrong et al., Suing on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Stockholders Similarly Situated and on Behalf and in the Right of Canadian Javelin Limited, Respondents, and Milton Berman, Suing on Behalf of Himself and All Other Stockholders Similarly Situated and on Behalf and in the Right of Canadian Javelin Limited, et al., Appellants, et al., Plaintiffs, v. John C. Doyle et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 12
Pages: 663–664

Head Matter:
John M. Armstrong et al., Suing on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Stockholders Similarly Situated and on Behalf and in the Right of Canadian Javelin Limited, Respondents, and Milton Berman, Suing on Behalf of Himself and All Other Stockholders Similarly Situated and on Behalf and in the Right of Canadian Javelin Limited, et al., Appellants, et al., Plaintiffs, v. John C. Doyle et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.
Submitted September 24, 1962;
decided September 27, 1962.
Laiorence Milberg for all motions.
George A. Spiegelberg and Max Schorr for motions to dispense with printing of exhibits and service of copies of record upon certain parties and opposed to cross motion.
Arthur TI. Christy and Irving L. Golomb for cross motion.
Milton S. Gould opposed to motions to dispense with printing of exhibits and service of copies of record upon certain parties.
Barry A. Witchell opposed to cross motion.

Opinion:
Motion for order of consolidation denied as unnecessary.
Motions to dispense with printing of exhibits and with service of copies of record upon parties not having filed brief or argued in Appellate Division granted to the extent that the original exhibits may be handed up and one copy only of the record on appeal be served on the attorneys for each party respondent.
Cross motion denied except to the extent that defendants-respondents may on the argument of the appeal renew the contention that plaintiff-appellant Berman is not a party in interest.