Case Name: The State of Ohio, Appellant, v. Teasley, Appellee
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2003-08-13
Citations: 99 Ohio St. 3d 1226
Docket Number: No. 2002-1298
Parties: The State of Ohio, Appellant, v. Teasley, Appellee.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 99
Pages: 1226–1226

Head Matter:
The State of Ohio, Appellant, v. Teasley, Appellee.
[Cite as State v. Teasley, 99 Ohio St.3d 1226, 2003-Ohio-4047.]
(No. 2002-1298
Submitted June 3, 2003
Decided August 13, 2003.)
Ron O’Brien, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and Susan E. Day, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.
Andrew P. Avellano, for appellee.

Opinion:
{¶ 1} The certification of conflict is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently certified; there is a want of a conflict.
Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor and O'Donnell, JJ., concur.