Case Name: PULLIAM v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1920-03-17
Citations: 219 S.W. 828
Docket Number: No. 5721
Parties: PULLIAM v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 219
Pages: 828–829

Head Matter:
PULLIAM v. STATE.
(No. 5721.)
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
March 17, 1920.)
Cbiminal law <&wkey;1097(4) — Without facts OBJECTIONS TO TESTIMONY CANNOT BE BE-VIEWED.
In the absence of a statement of facts, objections to the introduction of testimony cannot be reviewed.
Appeal from Criminal District Court, Tar-rant County; George E. Hosey, Judge.
Jess Pulliam was convicted of robbery, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
Alvin M. Owsley, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Opinion:
LATTIMORE, J.
In this case, appellant was convicted in the criminal district court of Tarrant county of the offense of robbery, and his punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of five years.
The record is before us without bills of exception or statement of facts. We have examined tlie indictment and the charge of the court, which seem to be in accordance with law; and no exceptions to the latter were taken on the trial. In his motion for a new trial, appellant makes a number of complaints with regard to the introduction of testimony, but same are of no weight before us, in the absence of a statement of facts.
There being no errors complained of which appear to be of weight, the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.
<S=3Por other cases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes