Case Name: John Richard ROMBACH v. STATE of Louisiana through the DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATION, OFFICE OF RISK MANAGEMENT, State of Louisiana through the Legislative Audit Advisory Council of the Louisiana Legislature, State of Louisiana through the Legislative Fiscal Office, State of Louisiana through the Office of the Legislative Auditor, Steven J. Theriot, CPA, Daryl G. Purpera, CPA, CFE, Glenn A. Koepp, Esq., Sherry L. Phillips-Hymel, James Wayne Tucker, Joel Thomas Chaisson, II, Esq., Charley Rome, and Alfred W. "Butch" Speer, Esq
Court: Louisiana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 2016-04-04
Citations: 190 So. 3d 1200
Docket Number: No. 2016-00214
Parties: John Richard ROMBACH v. STATE of Louisiana through the DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATION, OFFICE OF RISK MANAGEMENT, State of Louisiana through the Legislative Audit Advisory Council of the Louisiana Legislature, State of Louisiana through the Legislative Fiscal Office, State of Louisiana through the Office of the Legislative Auditor, Steven J. Theriot, CPA, Daryl G. Purpera, CPA, CFE, Glenn A. Koepp, Esq., Sherry L. Phillips-Hymel, James Wayne Tucker, Joel Thomas Chaisson, II, Esq., Charley Rome, and Alfred W. “Butch” Speer, Esq.
Judges: 
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 190
Pages: 1200–1200

Head Matter:
John Richard ROMBACH v. STATE of Louisiana through the DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATION, OFFICE OF RISK MANAGEMENT, State of Louisiana through the Legislative Audit Advisory Council of the Louisiana Legislature, State of Louisiana through the Legislative Fiscal Office, State of Louisiana through the Office of the Legislative Auditor, Steven J. Theriot, CPA, Daryl G. Purpera, CPA, CFE, Glenn A. Koepp, Esq., Sherry L. Phillips-Hymel, James Wayne Tucker, Joel Thomas Chaisson, II, Esq., Charley Rome, and Alfred W. “Butch” Speer, Esq.
No. 2016-00214.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
April 4, 2016.

Opinion:
In re John Richard Rombach; — Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. M, No. C604487; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2015 CA 0619.
Not considered. Not timely filed. See Supreme Court Rule X, § 5(a) and (d), and Supreme Court Rule XLII, § 6(e).