Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Efren ARANA-OLIVAS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-08-22
Citations: 235 F. App'x 629
Docket Number: No. 06-50278
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Efren ARANA-OLIVAS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: KLEINFELD, SILVERMAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 235
Pages: 629–630

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Efren ARANA-OLIVAS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-50278.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 13, 2007.
Filed Aug. 22, 2007.
Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Diane Marie Regan, Esq., Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: KLEINFELD, SILVERMAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Efren Arana-Olivas appeals from the district court's revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Arana-Olivas' challenge to the constitutionality of the supervised release sentencing scheme is foreclosed by this court's decision in United States v. Huerta-Pi- mental, 445 F.3d 1220, 1224-25 (9th Cir.2006) (explaining why supervised release sentencing scheme does not violate Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000)).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.