Case Name: Ingrid B. BREMER, Respondent, v. Alan F. CASEY, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-11-28
Citations: 34 S.W.3d 214
Docket Number: No. ED 76434
Parties: Ingrid B. BREMER, Respondent, v. Alan F. CASEY, Appellant.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., P.J., MARY RHODES RUSSELL and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 34
Pages: 214–215

Head Matter:
Ingrid B. BREMER, Respondent, v. Alan F. CASEY, Appellant.
No. ED 76434.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Nov. 28, 2000.
Blair Drazie, Maryland Heights, MO, for appellant.
Peter C. Woods, Haar & Woods, Mark J. Bremer, Kohn, Shands, Elbert, Gianou-lakis & Giljum, LLP, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., P.J., MARY RHODES RUSSELL and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Alan F. Casey appeals from the judgment entered against him and in favor of Ingrid B. Bremer in her suit to enforce a decree of dissolution of marriage. Casey argues that the court erred in awarding Bremer money pursuant to a term in a decree of dissolution and separation agreement that was vague and indefinite; in awarding interest to Bremer; and in awarding Bremer attorneys' fees.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and no error of law appears. No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an extended opinion reciting detailed facts and restating principles of law. We have, however, provided the parties with a memorandum opinion for their exclusive use detailing the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).