Case Name: Edita Magdirila BAUA, a/k/a Edita Magdirila, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-04-04
Citations: 565 F. App'x 159
Docket Number: No. 13-1934
Parties: Edita Magdirila BAUA, a/k/a Edita Magdirila, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 565
Pages: 159–160

Head Matter:
Edita Magdirila BAUA, a/k/a Edita Magdirila, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 13-1934.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 28, 2014.
Decided: April 4, 2014.
Arnedo S. Valera, Law Offices of Valera & Associates, Fairfax, Virginia, for Peti tioner. Stuart F. Delery, Assistant Attorney General, Shelley R. Goad, Assistant Director, Dalin R. Holyoak, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Edita Magdirila Baua, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the administrative record and Baua's contentions and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying reconsideration. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (b)(1) (2013). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Baua (B.I.A. June 27, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.