Case Name: State v. Leo Shufelt
Court: Vermont Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Vermont
Decision Date: 1935-05-09
Citations: 107 Vt. 358
Docket Number: 
Parties: State v. Leo Shufelt.
Judges: Present: Powebs, C. J., Moulton, Thompson, and Sherbubne, JJ., and Buttles, Supr. J.
Reporter: Vermont Reports
Volume: 107
Pages: 358–358

Head Matter:
State v. Leo Shufelt.
February Term, 1935.
Present: Powebs, C. J., Moulton, Thompson, and Sherbubne, JJ., and Buttles, Supr. J.
Opinion filed May 9, 1935.
E. J. Smith and David E. Porter for the respondent.
Lee E. Emerson, State’s attorney, for the State.

Opinion:
Buttles, Supr. J.
This is a prosecution under P. L. Sec. 8602, commonly known as the Blanket Act.
This case and State v. Myrtie Belle Woods, ante page 354, 179 Atl. 1, were tried together below and heard together in this Court. The two respondents are charged with being particeps criminis in the same offense, and the same questions are involved.
For the reasons specified in our opinion in State v. Woods, supra.
Judgment that there is no error in the record. Exceptions overruled. Let execution be done.