Case Name: ESTELLE WOLINER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JACK WOLINER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1975-09-23
Citations: 68 N.J. 324
Docket Number: 
Parties: ESTELLE WOLINER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JACK WOLINER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 68
Pages: 324–324

Head Matter:
ESTELLE WOLINER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JACK WOLINER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Argued September 8, 1975
Decided September 23, 1975.
Mr. Bernard Rudd argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Rudd and Ackerman, attorneys; Mr. Neil Braun on the brief).
Mr. Ernest Prupis argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Weltchek, Prupis and Ritz, attorneys).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed substantially for .the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Hughes, Justices Mountain, Sullivan, Pashman, Clifford and Sohreiber and Judge Conford — 7.
For reversal — None.