Case Name: In the Matter of Ruth M. Pollack, Admitted as Ruth Marie Pollack, a Suspended Attorney, Appellant. Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2013-12-12
Citations: 22 N.Y.3d 1016
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Ruth M. Pollack, Admitted as Ruth Marie Pollack, a Suspended Attorney, Appellant. Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, Respondent.
Judges: Chief Judge Lippman and Judge Abdus-Salaam taking no part.
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 22
Pages: 1016–1017

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Ruth M. Pollack, Admitted as Ruth Marie Pollack, a Suspended Attorney, Appellant. Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, Respondent.
Submitted October 7, 2013;
decided December 12, 2013

Opinion:
On the Court's own motion, appeal taken from the order of disbarment dismissed upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved; appeals from the other four orders dismissed upon the ground that those orders do not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for leave to appeal from the order of disbarment denied; motions for leave to appeal from the other four orders dismissed upon the ground that those orders do not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for ancillary relief dismissed as academic.
Chief Judge Lippman and Judge Abdus-Salaam taking no part.