Case Name: CAROLINA SALES COMPANY v. WHITE & WILDER
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 1922-02-22
Citations: 183 N.C. 671
Docket Number: 
Parties: CAROLINA SALES COMPANY v. WHITE & WILDER.
Judges: 
Reporter: North Carolina Reports
Volume: 183
Pages: 671–671

Head Matter:
CAROLINA SALES COMPANY v. WHITE & WILDER.
(Filed 22 February, 1922.)
(For digest, see Johnson v. Tates, ante, 24.)
Clabk, C. J., dissenting.
Appeal by plaintiff from Devin, J., at June Term, 1921, of Dtjeham.
In the above case, upon facts substantially similar to those presented in Johnson v. Tates, supra,
there was judgment for defendants, who held the property for repairs done at the instance of the purchaser of the automobile in possession of and using same with assent of the mortgagee.
W. G. Bramham for plaintiff.
Bryant & Brogden for defendant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
For the reasons stated in Johnson v. Yates, supra, the judgment in the instant ease is
Affirmed.