Case Name: PAUL P. ADAMS, PROSECUTOR-APPELLANT, v. MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLAINFIELD, RESPONDENTS
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1933-04-27
Citations: 110 N.J.L. 377
Docket Number: 
Parties: PAUL P. ADAMS, PROSECUTOR-APPELLANT, v. MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLAINFIELD, RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 110
Pages: 377–377

Head Matter:
PAUL P. ADAMS, PROSECUTOR-APPELLANT, v. MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLAINFIELD, RESPONDENTS.
Argued February 9, 1933
Decided April 27, 1933.
For the prosecutor-appellant, McCarter <& English (Robert II. McCarter, of counsel).
For the respondents, William Newcorn.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court dismissing the writ of certiorari previously allowed to the prosecutor reviewing an ordinance of the city of Plainfield that reduced the salaries of the firemen of that city.
The judgment appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Mr. Justice Lloyd, and reported in 109 N. J. L. 282. We observe that the opinion in two instances inadvertently mentions the "Walsh act" where the reference is clearly to the Home Rule act (Pamph. L. 1917, ch. 152), the first of the references being to article 13 of the last mentioned statute.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 10.
For reversal — JSTone.