Case Name: Ray JAMES, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2011-06-30
Citations: 65 So. 3d 119
Docket Number: No. 1D10-5607
Parties: Ray JAMES, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.
Judges: BENTON, C.J., LEWIS and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 65
Pages: 119–119

Head Matter:
Ray JAMES, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.
No. 1D10-5607.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
June 30, 2011.
Ray James, pro se, Petitioner.
No appearance for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of prohibition is DENIED on the merits. See Dickinson v. Fla. Natl. Org. for Women, 763 So.2d 1245, 1247 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (stating that in "the case of state agencies, the county of 'residence' is where the agency's headquarters are located"); Pettway v. State, 776 So.2d 930 (Fla.2000) (holding that when a party has been banned from appearing pro se in a particular tribunal, he or she cannot go to another tribunal to avoid the consequences of the sanction).
BENTON, C.J., LEWIS and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.