Case Name: Donald ROLLING, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1977-02-15
Citations: 342 So. 2d 558
Docket Number: No. 76-531
Parties: Donald ROLLING, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before HENDRY, C. J., and BARKDULL and NATHAN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 342
Pages: 558–558

Head Matter:
Donald ROLLING, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 76-531.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 15, 1977.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Karen M. Gottlieb, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Ira N. Loewy, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before HENDRY, C. J., and BARKDULL and NATHAN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellant was charged with possession of a controlled substance, to-wit: cocaine. He pleaded not guilty. A motion to suppress certain evidence was made and denied, whereupon, after some plea bargaining, appellant changed his plea of not guilty to one of nolo contendere with a reservation of his right to appeal the court's ruling denying his motion to suppress evidence. The court found appellant guilty of possession of cocaine, but withheld adjudication and placed appellant on reporting probation for a period of three years.
Appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a warrantless search of a motor vehicle.
We have carefully considered appellant's points on appeal in the light of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel. It is our conclusion that no reversible error has been made to appear.
Affirmed.