Case Name: Harry F. MOORE and Jean J. Moore, his wife, Appellants, v. ALLIED-SIGNAL, INC., et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-10-20
Citations: 605 So. 2d 1029
Docket Number: No. 92-113
Parties: Harry F. MOORE and Jean J. Moore, his wife, Appellants, v. ALLIED-SIGNAL, INC., et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before FERGUSON, LEVY and GERSTEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 605
Pages: 1029–1029

Head Matter:
Harry F. MOORE and Jean J. Moore, his wife, Appellants, v. ALLIED-SIGNAL, INC., et al., Appellees.
No. 92-113.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 20, 1992.
Robles & Gonzalez, and Daniels & Talisman, and David B. Pakula, Paul, Landy, Beiley & Harper, and Patrice A. Talisman, Miami, for appellants.
Blackwell & Walker, and Angela C. Flowers, Miami, for appellees.
Before FERGUSON, LEVY and GERSTEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We find that there were genuine issues of material fact which precluded the entry of summary judgment. See Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); Suggs v. Allen, 563 So.2d 1132 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Vilardebo v. Keene Corporation, 431 So.2d 620 (Fla. 3d DCA), dismissed, 438 So.2d 831 (Fla.1983). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.