Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ricardo FLORES-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-10-13
Citations: 348 F. App'x 312
Docket Number: No. 08-50582
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ricardo FLORES-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: SILVERMAN, RAWLINSON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 348
Pages: 312–313

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ricardo FLORES-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-50582.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 14, 2009 .
Filed Oct. 13, 2009.
Bruce R. Castetter, Randy K. Jones, Esquire, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marc B. Geller, Esquire, Marc B. Geller, Attorney at Law, APC, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: SILVERMAN, RAWLINSON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Ricardo Flores-Gareia appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to being a deported alien found in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.
Flores-Gareia contends that the district court failed to consider properly all of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors when it sentenced him, thereby rendering his sentence unreasonable. Our review of the record shows that the district court considered all of the factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) when it sentenced Flores-Gar-eia, and sentenced him in accordance with those factors. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 993 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc). Accordingly, we conclude the district court's 65-month sentence was reasonable.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.