Case Name: ARTHUR ALLORD, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. THE HENRY MUHS COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1933-09-27
Citations: 111 N.J.L. 237
Docket Number: 
Parties: ARTHUR ALLORD, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. THE HENRY MUHS COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 111
Pages: 237–237

Head Matter:
ARTHUR ALLORD, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. THE HENRY MUHS COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Submitted May 27, 1933
Decided September 27, 1933.
For the petitioner-respondent, W. Reading Gebhardt.
For the respondent-appellant, Cox & Wdlburg (Harry F. Wdlburg and Arthur F. Mead, of counsel).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion filed in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.
For reversal — Hone.