Case Name: WINDSOR CONTRACTING CORP., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, CROSS-APPELLANT, v. VINCENT BUDNY AND BUDNY'S TIRE SERVICE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, CROSS-RESPONDENTS
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1967-12-22
Citations: 51 N.J. 5
Docket Number: 
Parties: WINDSOR CONTRACTING CORP., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, CROSS-APPELLANT, v. VINCENT BUDNY AND BUDNY’S TIRE SERVICE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, CROSS-RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 51
Pages: 5–5

Head Matter:
WINDSOR CONTRACTING CORP., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, CROSS-APPELLANT, v. VINCENT BUDNY AND BUDNY’S TIRE SERVICE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, CROSS-RESPONDENTS.
Argued December 18,1967
Decided December 22,1967.
Mr. Edward B. Meredith for appellants (Messrs. Meredith & Meredith, attorneys).
Mr. Anton J. Hollendonner for respondent.

Opinion:
Pee Cubiam.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Kilkenny in the Appellate Division, 93 N. J. Super. 235. Mr. Justice Proctor votes to reverse for the reasons given by Judge Goldmann in his dissenting opinion.
For affirmance—Chief Justice Wbintbaub and Justices Jacobs, Ebancis, Schettino and Haneman—5.
For reversal—Justice Pboctoe—1.