Case Name: Robin RIVERA and Diane Cordero, Petitioners, v. Richard Charles BUNDSCHUH, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Scott Kenneth Bundschuh, deceased, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-09-21
Citations: 660 So. 2d 711
Docket Number: No. 84844
Parties: Robin RIVERA and Diane Cordero, Petitioners, v. Richard Charles BUNDSCHUH, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Scott Kenneth Bundschuh, deceased, Respondent.
Judges: GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 660
Pages: 711–711

Head Matter:
Robin RIVERA and Diane Cordero, Petitioners, v. Richard Charles BUNDSCHUH, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Scott Kenneth Bundschuh, deceased, Respondent.
No. 84844.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Sept. 21, 1995.
Chobee Ebbets of Ebbets, Armstrong & Chamberlin, Daytona Beach, for petitioners.
Richard H. Wilson and David A. Finlay of Wilson & Terrana, P.A., Tampa, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have for review an order of the First District Court of Appeal denying petitioners' petition for writ of certiorari, in which the district court addressed the same question we recently answered in Globe Newspaper Company v. King, 658 So.2d 518 (Fla.1995). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.
In accordance with our decision in Globe Newspaper, we approve the order of the district court in the instant case.
It is so ordered.
GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.