Case Name: Michel Andre DUKES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Detective M.R. RICHARDS, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-02-24
Citations: 366 F. App'x 467
Docket Number: No. 09-7711
Parties: Michel Andre DUKES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Detective M.R. RICHARDS, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 366
Pages: 467–467

Head Matter:
Michel Andre DUKES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Detective M.R. RICHARDS, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 09-7711.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 18, 2009.
Decided: Feb. 24, 2010.
Michel Andre Dukes, Appellant Pro Se. Scott Christopher Hart, Sumrell, Sugg, Carmichael, Hicks & Hart, PA, New Bern, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michel Andre Dukes appeals the district court's order granting the Defendant summary judgment on Dukes' 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) claims against him. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. See Dukes v. Richards, No. 5:06-ct-03094-D (E.D.N.C. Aug. 27, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.