Case Name: Michael RUFFIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1999-10-29
Citations: 745 So. 2d 415
Docket Number: No. 98-4816
Parties: Michael RUFFIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ALLEN, BENTON and BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 745
Pages: 415–415

Head Matter:
Michael RUFFIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 98-4816.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Oct. 29, 1999.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Carol Ann Turner, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Robert Butterworth, Attorney General, and Bart Schneider and Edward C. Hill, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this direct criminal appeal following revocation of his community control, the appellant argues for the first time that his sentence is illegal because it exceeds the statutory maximum for his offense. Although the sentence might be excessive under decisions such as State v. Summers, 642 So.2d 742 (Fla.1994), the record before us is not sufficiently developed to conclusively demonstrate that the sentence violates Summers. Accordingly, we affirm without prejudice to the appellant's right to challenge his sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.
ALLEN, BENTON and BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR.