Case Name: James NUGENT, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF ALEXANDRIA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1992-05-20
Citations: 602 So. 2d 734
Docket Number: Nos. 90-345 to 90-347
Parties: James NUGENT, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF ALEXANDRIA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before DOMENGEAUX, C.J., and COREIL and SALOOM , JJ. Pro Tem.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 602
Pages: 734–734

Head Matter:
James NUGENT, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF ALEXANDRIA, Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 90-345 to 90-347.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.
May 20, 1992.
Howard Gist, III, Gist, Methvin, Hughes & Munsterman, Alexandria, for plaintiff-appellee.
Broussard, Bolton, Halcomb & Vizzier, Daniel Broussard, Alexandria, for defendant-appellant.
Before DOMENGEAUX, C.J., and COREIL and SALOOM , JJ. Pro Tem.
HONORABLE JOSEPH E. COREIL, Retired, and HONORABLE KALISTE SALOOM, JR., participated in this decision by appointment of the Louisiana Supreme Court as Judges Pro Tem-pore.

Opinion:
JOSEPH E. COREIL, Judge Pro Tem.
For the reasons assigned in the companion case of Randy Matthews v. City of Alexandria, 602 So.2d 731 (La.App. 3 Cir.1992), (docket # 90-345 of this Court), the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in part and reversed in part. Costs of appeal and at the trial level are assessed to Randy Matthews and James Nugent. Costs of these remand proceedings are assessed to City of Alexandria.
AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND RENDERED.