Case Name: L. Wayne LEROUX and Barbara L.J. Leroux, Russell J. Mahy and Carolyn R. Mahy, B.M. "Mike" Milvain, and Sheila Miller, Appellants, v. NYNEX WORLDWIDE SERVICES GROUP, INC., f/k/a Nynex Information Solutions Group, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and Leroux, Pitts & Associates, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-07-31
Citations: 677 So. 2d 956
Docket Number: No. 95-02669
Parties: L. Wayne LEROUX and Barbara L.J. Leroux, Russell J. Mahy and Carolyn R. Mahy, B.M. “Mike” Milvain, and Sheila Miller, Appellants, v. NYNEX WORLDWIDE SERVICES GROUP, INC., f/k/a Nynex Information Solutions Group, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and Leroux, Pitts & Associates, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Appellees.
Judges: SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and PARKER and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 677
Pages: 956–956

Head Matter:
L. Wayne LEROUX and Barbara L.J. Leroux, Russell J. Mahy and Carolyn R. Mahy, B.M. “Mike” Milvain, and Sheila Miller, Appellants, v. NYNEX WORLDWIDE SERVICES GROUP, INC., f/k/a Nynex Information Solutions Group, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and Leroux, Pitts & Associates, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Appellees.
No. 95-02669.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
July 31, 1996.
Michael C. Addison, Tampa, F. Wallace Pope, Jr., of Johnson, Blakely, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, P.A., Clearwater, for Appellants.
W. Donald Cox and Hala A. Sandridge of Fowler, White, Gillen, Boggs, Villareal & Banker, Tampa, Charles S. Fax and Robert C. Sanders of Shapiro and Olander, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellants, L. Wayne Leroux, Barbara L.J. Leroux, Russell J. Mahy, Carolyn R. Mahy, Mike Milvain, and Sheila Miller, who were plaintiffs in the trial court,' appeal the trial court's entry of final summary judgment in favor of Appellees, Nynex Worldwide Services Group, Inc., f/k/a Nynex Informations Solutions Group, Inc. (ISG), and Leroux, Pitts & Associates, Inc. (LPA), defendants in the trial court. The appellants argue that there were genuine issues of material fact regarding the parties' intent in entering two agreements and that the trial court erred in concluding that the appellants were not entitled to certain payments under the agreements. We agree and reverse.
The relevant portions of the two agreements at issue in this ease involve section 4 of the Management and Earnout Agreement and the Key Employment Compensation Plan for the year 1991. Having thoroughly reviewed the affidavits and depositions involved in this two-year litigation, the briefs filed, and hearing answers to questions propounded by the court during oral argument, we conclude that there are material issues of fact involving both of the above-listed agreements which cannot be resolved by summary judgment. See Snyder v. Cheezem Dev. Corp., 373 So.2d 719 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).
We reverse and remand this matter for further proceedings in the trial court.
SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and PARKER and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.