Case Name: ELBURY v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1930-01-22
Citations: 25 S.W.2d 846
Docket Number: No. 12950
Parties: ELBURY v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 25
Pages: 846–847

Head Matter:
ELBURY v. STATE.
No. 12950.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Jan. 22, 1930.
Rehearing Granted March 5, 1930.
J. A. Collier and Bailey P. Loftin, both of Houston, for appellant.
O’Brien Stevens, Crim. Dist. Atty., of Houston, and A. A. Dawson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
CHRISTIAN, J.
The offense is theft, a misdemeanor; the punishment, a fine of $200 and "confinement in jail for three days.
No bills of exception are brought forward. In overruling appellant's motion for a new trial, the court failed to grant an extension of time for filing the statement of facts. This being a misdemeanor, appellant was required to file the statement of facts and bills of exception within thirty days after the adjournment of court,, unless before the expiration of that time the court, for good cause shown, extended the time within which the statement of facts and bills of exception might be filed. Article 760, subd. 5, C. C. P.; Stewart v. State, 108 Tex. Cr. R. 661, 2 S.W. (2d) 440. There appears in the transcript an order attempting to grant appellant thirty days' additional time in which to file his hills of exception and statement of facts. This order is not dated, and it is not shown that it was entered within the time allowed by law for filing the bills of exception and statement of facts. The thirty days, allowed by statute expired on April 29, 1929. The statement of facts was filed on May 24, 1929. To be effective, the order extending the time should have been made before the expiration of April 29th. Stewart v. State, supra. The state's motion to strike the statement of facts from the record must be sustained.
Appellant fails to point out any fundamental error, and no ruling of the trial court has been presented for review.
The judgment is affirmed.