Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Samuel Rodney HOLMES, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-11-18
Citations: 670 F. App'x 194
Docket Number: No. 16-6635
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Samuel Rodney HOLMES, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 670
Pages: 194–194

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Samuel Rodney HOLMES, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-6635
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: November 8, 2016
Decided: November 18, 2016
Samuel Rodney Holmes, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Zalkin Hitt, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Samuel Rodney Holmes appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reconsideration of its earlier order granting him a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. §. 3582(c)(2) (2012). In the prior order, the district court reduced his sentence to the bottom of his amended Guidelines range. In his motion for reconsidera-' tion, Holmes sought a further reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Holmes, No. l:05-cr-01253-MBS-l (D.S.C. Apr. 21, 2016; Nov. 24, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 'argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED