Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James F. POLLENDER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-12-12
Citations: 211 F. App'x 606
Docket Number: No. 05-30468
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James F. POLLENDER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: GOODWIN, RYMER, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 211
Pages: 606–606

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James F. POLLENDER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-30468.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 4, 2006.
Filed Dec. 12, 2006.
James E. Seykora, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Billings, MT, for PlaintiffAppellee.
Mark S. Werner, Esq., Federal Defenders of Montana, Billings, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: GOODWIN, RYMER, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
James F. Pollender appeals from the 150-month sentence imposed following our remand for re-sentencing in United States v. Mann, 389 F.3d 869 (9th Cir.2004). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we vacate the sentence and remand for re-sentencing.
Pollender contends that the district court erred when it applied a two-level enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2Dl.l(b)(5)(A) (2002) on the ground that Pollender unlawfully transported or stored hazardous waste. Because the government concedes that the enhancement was applied in error, we vacate and remand for the limited purpose of resentencing without the § 2Dl.l(b)(5)(A) enhancement.
SENTENCE VACATED and REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.