Case Name: C. D. Hamner, as Receiver of the Island City National Bank of Key West, Florida, a Corporation Organized Under the National Banking Laws of this United States of America, Appellant, v. The Tropical Building & Investment Company, a Corporation, Organized Under the Laws of the State of Florida, Recently Doing Business in the City of Key West, Florida, and Against Shirley C. Bott, as Receiver of the Tropical Building & Investment Company, a Corporation Organized Under the Laws of the State of Florida, and Against Ernest R. Kirkland and Against Adele Kirkland, Appellees
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1921-06-04
Citations: 81 Fla. 802
Docket Number: 
Parties: C. D. Hamner, as Receiver of the Island City National Bank of Key West, Florida, a Corporation Organized Under the National Banking Laws of this United States of America, Appellant, v. The Tropical Building & Investment Company, a Corporation, Organized Under the Laws of the State of Florida, Recently Doing Business in the City of Key West, Florida, and Against Shirley C. Bott, as Receiver of the Tropical Building & Investment Company, a Corporation Organized Under the Laws of the State of Florida, and Against Ernest R. Kirkland and Against Adele Kirkland, Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 81
Pages: 802–802

Head Matter:
C. D. Hamner, as Receiver of the Island City National Bank of Key West, Florida, a Corporation Organized Under the National Banking Laws of this United States of America, Appellant, v. The Tropical Building & Investment Company, a Corporation, Organized Under the Laws of the State of Florida, Recently Doing Business in the City of Key West, Florida, and Against Shirley C. Bott, as Receiver of the Tropical Building & Investment Company, a Corporation Organized Under the Laws of the State of Florida, and Against Ernest R. Kirkland and Against Adele Kirkland, Appellees.
Decision Filed June 4, 1921.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Monroe' County; H. Pierre Branning, Judge.
W. Hunt Harris, for Appellant;
Win. H. Malone, for Appellees.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the decree aforesaid, and. briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the'premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed;
All concur.