Case Name: WADE v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1930-04-16
Citations: 29 S.W.2d 377
Docket Number: No. 13257
Parties: WADE v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 29
Pages: 377–379

Head Matter:
WADE v. STATE.
No. 13257.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
April 16, 1930.
Rehearing Denied June 27, 1930.
Jno. A. Veillon and Dan E. Doherty, both of San Antonio, for appellant.
A. A. Dawson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
LATTIMORE, J.
The conviction is for theft; punishment, two years in the penitentiary.
We deem tlie evidence ample and sufficient to show that the appellant and a companion went to a rent car firm in San Antonio and rented from them a car ostensibly to be driven around in the city of San Antonio, but which was tafeen by the' appellant and his companion to the city of Port Arthur, where it was later found. The facts seem amply to support the verdict and judgment.
There are four bills of exceptions in the record, each of which has been examined, and none of which presents error.
Bill No. 1 complains of the introduction of a contract to rent a car made by the man who seems to have been implicated with the ap-' pellant. No facts are shown in the bill by which we can determine whether the matter was material or otherwise.
Bill No. 2 sets out the complaint of the refusal of a peremptory instruction in favor of the appellant.
Bill No. 3 sets up the refusal of a requested charge seeking to have the jury told that the state's witness Tubbs was an accomplice. We think the facts show the contrary.
The remaining bill was taken to the overruling of-the motion for new trial.
Binding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.