Case Name: Frances L. Holmes v. City of New London
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1953-12-08
Citations: 140 Conn. 477
Docket Number: 
Parties: Frances L. Holmes v. City of New London
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 140
Pages: 477–478

Head Matter:
Frances L. Holmes v. City of New London
Baldwin, Inglis, O’Sullivan, Quinlan and Wynne, Js.
Argued October 13
decided December 8, 1953
Edmund J. Eshenf elder, for the appellant (defendant).
Francis F. McGuire, with whom, on the brief, was Morgan K. McGuire, for the appellee (plaintiff).

Opinion:
Pee Curiam.
All of the claims raised on this appeal have basis only if the finding can be corrected. The conclusions of the trial court are legally drawn from the facts as it found them. To interfere with the conclusions would be to substitute different findings of fact. This cannot he done where there is evidence upon which reasoning minds might disagree. Here there is no basis for correcting the finding. This being so, the conclusions must stand.
There is no error.