Case Name: The State ex rel. O'Brien, Pros. Atty., et al., Appellants, v. Powerfone, Inc. et al., Appellees
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1999-03-24
Citations: 85 Ohio St. 3d 109
Docket Number: Nos. 98-148 and 98-630
Parties: The State ex rel. O’Brien, Pros. Atty., et al., Appellants, v. Powerfone, Inc. et al., Appellees.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 85
Pages: 109–110

Head Matter:
The State ex rel. O’Brien, Pros. Atty., et al., Appellants, v. Powerfone, Inc. et al., Appellees.
[Cite as State ex rel. O’Brien v. Powerfone, Inc. (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 109.]
(Nos. 98-148 and 98-630
Submitted February 24, 1999
Decided March 24, 1999.)
Ron O’Brien, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and Joseph R. Durham, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellants.

Opinion:
The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Campanelli v. AT&T Wireless Serv., Inc. (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 103, 706 N.E.2d 1267, decided today.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Pfeifer, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Campanelli v. AT&T Wireless Serv., Inc. (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 103, 108-109, 706 N.E.2d 1267, 1270-1271.