Case Name: Wimple and another vs. M'Dougal
Court: New York Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1798-04
Citations: 1 Cole. Cas. 49
Docket Number: 
Parties: Wimple and another vs. M'Dougal.
Judges: 
Reporter: Coleman's Cases
Volume: 1
Pages: 49–50

Head Matter:
Wimple and another vs. M'Dougal.
Ejectment. TETAN VECHTEN for the Plaintiff, ~ moved for leave to amend the declaration in ejeóiment, by adding a count on the demife of a perfon not originally named as a leffor. He mentioned the Cafe of Jackfon ex dem. Quackenbos vs. Dennis, where this was allowed.
Graham contra.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
In the cafe of Quackenbos vs. Dennis, it was fo ordered, and that is Lo be con-íiJ.cred as a precedent to govern. But it is rea-fonable that the Defendant fhottld be permitted to relinquifh his defence, if he chufes to So fo, as the introduction of a new party may vary his fituation. Let him cleft, by Friday next, to abide by or relinquifh his plea; and if he relinquifhes it, the Plaintiff muft pay all the coils accrued up to that Day.