Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Samuel William COCKE, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-05-18
Citations: 325 F. App'x 465
Docket Number: No. 08-3461
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Samuel William COCKE, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 325
Pages: 465–466

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Samuel William COCKE, Appellant.
No. 08-3461.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: May 11, 2009.
Filed: May 18, 2009.
Jeffrey S. Paulsen, Nancy Ellen Brasel, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Minneapolis, MN, for Appellee.
Manvir Kaur Atwal, Assistant, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Minneapolis, MN, Samuel William Cocke, Chicago, IL, for Appellant.
Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, BYE, Circuit Judge, and MILLER, District Judge.
. The Honorable Brian Stacy Miller, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Samuel William Cocke appeals the eighteen-month sentence he received for violating a condition of his supervised release. Despite the fact his sentence is three months below the low end of the range recommended under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 7B1.4(a) (21-27 months based on the Grade B violation Cocke admitted to and his Criminal History Category of VI), Cocke argues the district court imposed an unreasonable sentence.
We review the sentence imposed for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Charles, 531 F.3d 637, 640 (8th Cir.2008). The record indicates the district court was aware of, and considered, the relevant sentencing factors listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) for determining an appropriate sentence for a violation of supervised release. The record also indicates the district court considered Cocke's arguments for imposing a lower sentence. We see nothing in the record to indicate the district court abused its discretion in imposing a sentence that was already below the recommended Guidelines, and therefore affirm.
. The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.