Case Name: Maurice Segar v. Nancy C. Lounsbury, Administratrix (Estate of C. C. Lounsbury), et al.
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1964-12-01
Citations: 152 Conn. 733
Docket Number: 
Parties: Maurice Segar v. Nancy C. Lounsbury, Administratrix (Estate of C. C. Lounsbury), et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 152
Pages: 733–734

Head Matter:
Maurice Segar v. Nancy C. Lounsbury, Administratrix (Estate of C. C. Lounsbury), et al.

Opinion:
It appearing that the defendants in the above-entitled case have failed to prosecute their appeal from the Superior Court in Tolland County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court of Errors, suo motu, that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed.
Argued December 1
decided December 1, 1964
Donald P. Chernoff, for the appellants (defendants).
The defendants filed a motion for reargument which was granted.