Case Name: Edward Dane JEFFUS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. S. HOLLEMBAEK, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-02-03
Citations: 675 F. App'x 373
Docket Number: No. 16-7154
Parties: Edward Dane JEFFUS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. S. HOLLEMBAEK, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 675
Pages: 373–374

Head Matter:
Edward Dane JEFFUS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. S. HOLLEMBAEK, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 16-7154
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: January 31, 2017
Decided: February 3, 2017
Edward Dane Jeffus, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Edward Dane Jeffus appeals the district court's order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for relief from the court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in for-ma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jeffus v. Hollembaek, No. 5:15-hc-02240-D (E.D.N.C. Oct. 5, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
To the extent that Jeffus appeals the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for failure to prosecute, Jeffus' claims are rendered moot by the district court's thorough consideration- of his petition in its subsequent order denying Jeffus' Rule 60(b) motion.