Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Isidro Marin HERNANDEZ, aka Jose Ines Marin Jimenez, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-11-21
Citations: 545 F. App'x 678
Docket Number: No. 12-50575
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Isidro Marin HERNANDEZ, aka Jose Ines Marin Jimenez, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: FISHER and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges, and SINGLETON, District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 545
Pages: 678–678

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Isidro Marin HERNANDEZ, aka Jose Ines Marin Jimenez, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-50575.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Nov. 21, 2013.
Curtis A. Kin, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Christina T. Shay, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Humberto Diaz, Jonathan D. Libby, Esquire, Deputy Federal Public Defender, FPDCA-Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: FISHER and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges, and SINGLETON, District Judge.
The Honorable James K. Singleton, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Alaska, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Any alleged breach of the terms of the plea agreement by the government did not amount to plain error because there is no basis to conclude that the sentence imposed by the district court was affected by the prosecution's comments in its sentencing memorandum. See United States v. Gonzalez-Aguilar, 718 F.3d 1185, 1188-90 (9th Cir.2013). In addition, the district court offered sufficiently clear and individualized reasons for rejecting the plea agreement. See In re Morgan, 506 F.3d 705, 711-12 (9th Cir.2007).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.