Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Reyes GARRATE-TIRADO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-03-27
Citations: 320 F. App'x 705
Docket Number: No. 08-10241
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Reyes GARRATE-TIRADO, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 320
Pages: 705–706

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Reyes GARRATE-TIRADO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-10241.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 18, 2009.
Filed March 27, 2009.
Raymond Woo, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Reyes Garrate-Tirado, Florence, AZ, pro se.
Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Reyes Garrate-Tirado appeals from the 34-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for harboring illegal aliens, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(l)(A)(iii) and (v)(iii). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we dismiss based on the valid appeal waiver.
We review de novo Garrate-Tirado's contention that the appeal waiver in his plea agreement does not preclude this ap peal because it does not unambiguously prevent him from challenging the manner in which his sentence was imposed. See United States v. Bibler, 495 F.3d 621, 624 (9th Cir.2007). We are unpersuaded, because the plea agreement unambiguously waives the right to any appeal permitted by 18 U.S.C. § 3742, which includes Gar-rate-Tirado's claim that his sentence was imposed in violation of law. We therefore enforce the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Bibler, 495 F.3d at 624.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.