Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. JON MICHAEL HANEY, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2004-12-08
Citations: 196 Or. App. 498
Docket Number: 00CR0978MI; A116614
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. JON MICHAEL HANEY, Appellant.
Judges: Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Brewer, Chief Judge and Armstrong, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 196
Pages: 498–500

Head Matter:
On respondent’s petition for reconsideration filed September 28,
reconsideration allowed; former opinion (195 Or App 273, 97 P3d 1211) modified and adhered to as modified December 8, 2004
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. JON MICHAEL HANEY, Appellant.
00CR0978MI; A116614
103 P3d 108
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Daniel J. Casey, Assistant Attorney General, for petition.
Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Brewer, Chief Judge and Armstrong, Judge.
ARMSTRONG, J.

Opinion:
ARMSTRONG, J.
The state has petitioned for reconsideration, arguing that we erred in describing the manner in which the administrative search issue arose in this case. Although there is no transcript of the suppression hearing, we are now convinced that the issue was discussed at the suppression hearing and did not first arise in the court's letter opinion in which it explained its decision to deny defendant's suppression motion. We modify our previous opinion accordingly. However, our conclusion on this point does not affect the result in the case because we conclude that defendant adequately preserved the issues raised on appeal. We therefore adhere to our opinion as modified.
Reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified and adhered to as modified.