Case Name: FALCON RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a New Mexico limited liability company, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The CITY OF RIO RANCHO, a municipal corporation; Dain Rauscher, a Minnesota corporation; George K. Baum and Company, a Missouri corporation, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-05-07
Citations: 33 F. App'x 981
Docket Number: No. 01-2127
Parties: FALCON RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a New Mexico limited liability company, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The CITY OF RIO RANCHO, a municipal corporation; Dain Rauscher, a Minnesota corporation; George K. Baum and Company, a Missouri corporation, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before HENRY and PORFILIO, Circuit Judges, and SAM, District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 33
Pages: 981–981

Head Matter:
FALCON RIDGE DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a New Mexico limited liability company, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The CITY OF RIO RANCHO, a municipal corporation; Dain Rauscher, a Minnesota corporation; George K. Baum and Company, a Missouri corporation, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 01-2127.
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
May 7, 2002.
Before HENRY and PORFILIO, Circuit Judges, and SAM, District Judge.
The Honorable David Sam, Senior Judge, United States District Court for the District of Utah, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
ORDER AND JUDGMENT
SAM, District Judge.
Plaintiff Falcon Ridge Development, LLC, appeals the judgment of the district court which granted the City of Rio Rancho's (the "City") partial motion to dismiss plaintiffs two claims for violation of substantive due process. The district court granted the City's partial motion to dismiss the two federal claims concluding that plaintiff did not have protected property or liberty interests. The district court declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims. We AFFIRM for substantially the reasons given by the district court.
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel: The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgement may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.