Case Name: In the Matter of the Marriage of BELKNAP, Respondent-Cross-Appellant, and BELKNAP, Appellant-Cross-Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1980-11-10
Citations: 49 Or. App. 74
Docket Number: No. D7906-64760, CA 17117
Parties: In the Matter of the Marriage of BELKNAP, Respondent-Cross-Appellant, and BELKNAP, Appellant-Cross-Respondent.
Judges: Before Joseph, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Warren, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 49
Pages: 74–74

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted October 13,
affirmed as modified and remanded November 10, 1980
In the Matter of the Marriage of BELKNAP, Respondent-Cross-Appellant, and BELKNAP, Appellant-Cross-Respondent.
(No. D7906-64760, CA 17117)
618 P2d 1003
Paul D. Schultz, Oregon City, argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent. With him on the brief was Hib-bard, Caldwell, Canning, Bowerman & Schultz, Oregon City.
Francis E. Harrington, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Harrington, Anderson & DeBlasio, Portland.
Before Joseph, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Warren, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Both parties to this dissolution proceeding have appealed. We find no reason to change the trial court's decree except in one respect: The trial court awarded wife $200 per month spousal support for nine months, but it is urged by the husband and conceded by the wife that there was no evidence presented of any need for spousal support. That part of the decree, therefore, is stricken. Ward v. Ward, 41 Or App 447, 453, 599 P2d 1151 (1979).
Affirmed as modified and remanded; no costs to either party.