Case Name: Mark A. PANOWICZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sharon L. HANCOCK, in individual capacity; Sharon L. Hancock, Clerk of the Circuit Court for Charles County (in official capacity), Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-10-24
Citations: 670 F. App'x 83
Docket Number: No. 15-2376
Parties: Mark A. PANOWICZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sharon L. HANCOCK, in individual capacity; Sharon L. Hancock, Clerk of the Circuit Court for Charles County (in official capacity), Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 670
Pages: 83–84

Head Matter:
Mark A. PANOWICZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sharon L. HANCOCK, in individual capacity; Sharon L. Hancock, Clerk of the Circuit Court for Charles County (in official capacity), Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15-2376
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: October 7, 2016
Decided: October 24, 2016
Mark A. Panowicz, Appellant Pro Se. Michele J. McDonald, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appel-lees.
Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Mark A. Panowicz seeks to appeal the district court's orders granting summary judgment for the defendant Sharon L. Hancock, denying leave to amend, and denying his motions for reconsideration and to reopen sovereign immunity issues. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Panowicz v. Hancock, No. 8:11-cv-02417-DKC, 2015 WL 4231712 (D. Md. July 9, 2015; Oct. 5, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED