Case Name: CAMERON COUNTY, Plaintiff in Error, v. J. E. WUERSTEN, Defendant in Error
Court: Texas Courts of Civil Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1925-06-10
Citations: 272 S.W. 1118
Docket Number: No. 7382
Parties: CAMERON COUNTY, Plaintiff in Error, v. J. E. WUERSTEN, Defendant in Error.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 272
Pages: 1118–1118

Head Matter:
CAMERON COUNTY, Plaintiff in Error, v. J. E. WUERSTEN, Defendant in Error.
(No. 7382.)
(Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.
June 10, 1925.
Rehearing Denied June 26, 1925.)
Error from Cameron County Court; Oscar C. Dancy, Judge.
Spears & Montgomery, of San Benito, for plaintiff in error. T. A. Kinder and H. L. Yates, both of Brownsville, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
ELY, C. J.
The commissioners' court of Cameron county, after fully complying with all the requirements of the law'as to condemnation of land for a public road, ordered that the road described by metes and bounds be established, and that the value of the land taken from defendant in error by the court be deposited with the county treasurer to the credit of defendant in error, and it was ordered that a second-class road be opened and worked. From that order an appeal to the county court was prosecuted. Upon the verdict of a jury, judgment was rendered in the county court, that defendant in error recover from plaintiff in error $168. The jury found in answer to special issues that 5%oo of an acre of land belonging to defendant in error was appropriated by plaintiff in error and that it was of the value of $168. There was no testimony to show that a road had been established along the drainage ditch on the land now owned by plaintiff in error. It was proved that a road ran-along and on the land, but showed no right in plaintiff in error to its use. The evidence was ample to sustain the verdict of the jury. The judgment is affirmed.