Case Name: Edward R. BRYANT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1997-12-23
Citations: 956 S.W.2d 954
Docket Number: No. WD 54374
Parties: Edward R. BRYANT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before SPINDEN, P.J., and LAURA DENYIR STITH and EDWIN H. SMITH, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 956
Pages: 954–954

Head Matter:
Edward R. BRYANT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 54374.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Dec. 23, 1997.
Emmett D. Queener, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before SPINDEN, P.J., and LAURA DENYIR STITH and EDWIN H. SMITH, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Edward R. Bryant appeals the motion court's denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Mr. Bryant claims that the court erred in denying his motion because his trial counsel misled him by incorrectly stating that he could be sentenced to 10 years as a persistent offender if he went to trial. Mr. Bryant has failed to meet his burden to show prejudice because he did not claim that absent the incorrect information he would not have pleaded guilty and insisted on going to trial. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm by this summary order and have supplied the parties with a memorandum setting forth our rea-, soning. Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).