Case Name: Pete SMITH, a/k/a Pete Noble Muhammad, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Stephen DEWALT, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-12-23
Citations: 83 F. App'x 560
Docket Number: No. 03-7627
Parties: Pete SMITH, a/k/a Pete Noble Muhammad, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Stephen DEWALT, Warden, Respondent—Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 83
Pages: 560–561

Head Matter:
Pete SMITH, a/k/a Pete Noble Muhammad, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Stephen DEWALT, Warden, Respondent—Appellee.
No. 03-7627.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 11, 2003.
Decided Dec. 23, 2003.
Pete Smith, Appellant pro se.
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
Pete Smith, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Smith v. Dewalt, No. CA-03-709-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Sept. 25, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED