Case Name: Curtis T. YEAGER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2014-04-29
Citations: 428 S.W.3d 782
Docket Number: No. WD 76148
Parties: Curtis T. YEAGER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Division Three: THOMAS H. NEWTON, Presiding Judge, MARK D. PFEIFFER, Judge and CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 428
Pages: 782–782

Head Matter:
Curtis T. YEAGER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 76148.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
April 29, 2014.
Damien De Loyola, for appellant.
Mary H. Moore, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before Division Three: THOMAS H. NEWTON, Presiding Judge, MARK D. PFEIFFER, Judge and CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Curtis Yeager appeals from the motion court's denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. Yeager's motion asserted that he received ineffective assistance of counsel and that he was coerced into pleading guilty because his plea counsel failed to properly investigate and prepare Yeager's defense. Yeager argues that the motion court erred in denying his motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).