Case Name: Roger MATTES, Petitioner, v. Lewis KATES, Respondent at No. 321 M.D.; Roger MATTES, Individually, and Mattes & Mattes, P.C., Petitioners, v. Jerome BARTH, Audrey Barth, West Mountain Poultry Company and Lewis Kates, Respondents at No. 322 M.D.
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1996-07-11
Citations: 544 Pa. 553
Docket Number: 
Parties: Roger MATTES, Petitioner, v. Lewis KATES, Respondent at No. 321 M.D. Roger MATTES, Individually, and Mattes & Mattes, P.C., Petitioners, v. Jerome BARTH, Audrey Barth, West Mountain Poultry Company and Lewis Kates, Respondents at No. 322 M.D.
Judges: 
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 544
Pages: 553–554

Head Matter:
678 A.2d 361
Roger MATTES, Petitioner, v. Lewis KATES, Respondent at No. 321 M.D. Roger MATTES, Individually, and Mattes & Mattes, P.C., Petitioners, v. Jerome BARTH, Audrey Barth, West Mountain Poultry Company and Lewis Kates, Respondents at No. 322 M.D.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
July 11, 1996.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 11th day of July, 1996, the Petitions for Allowance of Appeal are hereby GRANTED, BUT LIMITED to the following issue:
Whether the Superior Court erred in finding that Lackawanna County Local Rule of Court 1028(h) is not violative of Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 239(f).