Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles Allen CRIBB, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-06-05
Citations: 280 F. App'x 310
Docket Number: No. 08-6397
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Charles Allen CRIBB, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 280
Pages: 310–310

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Charles Allen CRIBB, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 08-6397.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 29, 2008.
Decided: June 5, 2008.
Charles Allen Cribb, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Charles Allen Cribb seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582 (West 2000 & Supp.2008). In criminal cases, the defendant must file the notice of appeal within ten days after the entry of judgment. Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(1)(A); see United States v. Alvarez, 210 F.3d 309, 310 (5th Cir.2000) (holding that § 3582 proceeding is criminal in nature and ten-day appeal period applies). With or without a motion, upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause, the district court may grant an extension of up to thirty days to file a notice of appeal. Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes, 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir.1985).
The district court entered its oral order denying the motion for reduction of sentence on January 29, 2008. The notice of appeal was filed on March 11, 2008. Because Cribb failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.