Case Name: The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Brown, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1996-02-14
Citations: 74 Ohio St. 3d 523
Docket Number: No. 95-2122
Parties: The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Brown, Appellant.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 74
Pages: 523–524

Head Matter:
The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Brown, Appellant.
[Cite as State v. Brown (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 523.]
(No. 95-2122
Submitted December 12, 1995
Decided February 14, 1996.)
Mathias H. Heck, Jr., Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney, and Carley J. Ingram, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
Ronald Perry Brown, pro se.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed. In this court, appellant makes no attempt to establish good cause, but instead argues the questions he wanted the court of appeals to hear, but which it did not hear. The application was rejected for failure to state a good cause for late filing. That is the issue before this court. Since appellant does not even address the issue, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.