Case Name: Alfred Marling Corbett, Respondent, v. Adro Holding Corporation and Another, Respondents, and Celia Merwin, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1938-10-05
Citations: 255 A.D. 821
Docket Number: 
Parties: Alfred Marling Corbett, Respondent, v. Adro Holding Corporation and Another, Respondents, and Celia Merwin, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 255
Pages: 821–821

Head Matter:
Alfred Marling Corbett, Respondent, v. Adro Holding Corporation and Another, Respondents, and Celia Merwin, Appellant.

Opinion:
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Memorandum: As the assignment to the appellant which the plaintiff seeks to set aside Was executed in Erie county and as the convenience of a greater number of the witnesses, considering the action as a whole, will be served by a trial of the action in that county, we conclude that the Special Term properly denied defendant's motion. All concur. (The order denies defendant's motion for change of venue.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.