Case Name: City of New Orleans vs. Arthur Leibe
Court: Louisiana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1893-03
Citations: 45 La. Ann. 346
Docket Number: No. 11,136
Parties: City of New Orleans vs. Arthur Leibe.
Judges: 
Reporter: Louisiana Annual Reports
Volume: 45
Pages: 346–346

Head Matter:
No. 11.136.
City of New Orleans vs. Arthur Leibe.
A building contraetoi is not exempted from license under Article 206 of the Constitution, because, in connection with Ills business as contractor, he does some mechanical labor. Affirming City vs. X^ohlman and City vs. McNally, is An.
APPEAL from the First City Court of New Orleans. Childress, J.
Geo. W. Flynn, Assistant City Attorney, and E. A. O’Sullivan, City Attorney, for Plaintiff and Appellee.
JET. IT. Bryan for Defendant and Appellant.

Opinion:
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Fenner, J.
The claim is for license as a building contractor. The defence is that the party is a carpenter, exempt under Article 206 of the Oonstitution.
On the facts the case can not be distinguished from those of Oity vs. Pohlman and Oity vs. McNally, recently decided, and the same law must be applied, rejecting the exemption claimed.
Judgment affirmed.