Case Name: Commonwealth v. Bottone, Appellant
Court: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1966-06-03
Citations: 208 Pa. Super. 722
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 109
Parties: Commonwealth v. Bottone, Appellant.
Judges: Hoffman, J., dissents and would grant a new trial.
Reporter: Pennsylvania Superior Court Reports
Volume: 208
Pages: 722–722

Head Matter:
Commonwealth v. Bottone, Appellant.
Argued April 11, 1966.
Sigmund L. Bloom, with him Milton D. Rosenberg, and Bloom, Bloom, Rosenberg & Bloom, for appellant; Arnold W. Hirsch, First Assistant District Attorney, with him Harold V. Fergus, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam :
The judgment of sentence is affirmed and the defendant is directed to appear in the court below at such time as he may be there called, and that he be by that court committed until he has complied with the sentence, or any part of it which had not been performed at the time the appeal was made a supersedeas.
Hoffman, J., dissents and would grant a new trial.