Case Name: Patricia HENKE, Employee/Appellant, v. INTERLOCK PHARMACY SYSTEMS, INC., Employer/Respondent, and Continental Casualty Co., Insurer/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-03-24
Citations: 963 S.W.2d 724
Docket Number: No. 72684
Parties: Patricia HENKE, Employee/Appellant, v. INTERLOCK PHARMACY SYSTEMS, INC., Employer/Respondent, and Continental Casualty Co., Insurer/Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANE, P. J., and RHODES RUSSELL and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 963
Pages: 724–724

Head Matter:
Patricia HENKE, Employee/Appellant, v. INTERLOCK PHARMACY SYSTEMS, INC., Employer/Respondent, and Continental Casualty Co., Insurer/Respondent.
No. 72684.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
March 24, 1998.
Andrew H. Marty, St. Louis, for Employee/Appellant.
Patrick S. Butler, St. Louis, for Employer/Insurer.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Vicky L. Anthony, Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Louis, for respondent.
Before CRANE, P. J., and RHODES RUSSELL and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Claimant appeals from a workers' compensation award issued by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission.
The order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).