Case Name: Gila Hellman v. Mordecai Hellman
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1988-06-23
Citations: 15 Conn. App. 816
Docket Number: 6249
Parties: Gila Hellman v. Mordecai Hellman
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Appellate Reports
Volume: 15
Pages: 816–816

Head Matter:
Gila Hellman v. Mordecai Hellman
(6249)
Spallone, Norcott and Poti, Js.
Submitted on briefs June 3—
decision released June 23, 1988
Vicky D. Henry and Paul Martin Tymniak filed a brief for the appellant (defendant).
Gaetano Ferro filed a brief for the appellee (plaintiff).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The defendant appeals from the trial court's pendente lite awards of alimony and child support.
The defendant contends that the trial court erred (1) in finding that it had jurisdiction over the defendant, and (2) in ruling on the plaintiff's motion for alimony and support, pendente lite, without a showing of a substantial change in circumstances.
Neither claim of error has merit. The defendant was personally served in Connecticut and our review of the record, transcript and briefs clearly indicates that the trial court properly exercised its broad discretion and fashioned its awards in conformity with applicable law.
There is no error.