Case Name: In the Matter of Lemar H. Forestdale, Inc., et al., Respondents; Ervin H., Jr., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Kenmar H. Forestdale, Inc., et al., Respondents; Ervin H., Jr., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.)
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2008-09-11
Citations: 11 N.Y.3d 770
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Lemar H. Forestdale, Inc., et al., Respondents; Ervin H., Jr., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Kenmar H. Forestdale, Inc., et al., Respondents; Ervin H., Jr., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.)
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 11
Pages: 770–770

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Lemar H. Forestdale, Inc., et al., Respondents; Ervin H., Jr., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Kenmar H. Forestdale, Inc., et al., Respondents; Ervin H., Jr., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.)
Submitted July 7, 2008;
decided September 11, 2008

Opinion:
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that dismissed appeals from parts of Family Court orders entered on consent, dismissed upon the ground that as to that part of the Appellate Division order, appellant is not a party aggrieved; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.