Case Name: INVERSIONES MENRIVISA, C.A., Tarsicio S. Alvarez and Tarsicio S. Alvarez-Rivero, Appellants, v. VENTUROSO CORPORATION, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-10-20
Citations: 609 So. 2d 653
Docket Number: No. 92-1305
Parties: INVERSIONES MENRIVISA, C.A., Tarsicio S. Alvarez and Tarsicio S. Alvarez-Rivero, Appellants, v. VENTUROSO CORPORATION, Appellee.
Judges: Before JORGENSON, LEVY and GODERICH, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 609
Pages: 653–653

Head Matter:
INVERSIONES MENRIVISA, C.A., Tarsicio S. Alvarez and Tarsicio S. Alvarez-Rivero, Appellants, v. VENTUROSO CORPORATION, Appellee.
No. 92-1305.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 20, 1992.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 12, 1993.
Hall, O’Brien and Sack and Andrew C. Hall and Amy S. Marcus, Miami, for appellants.
Greenberg, Traurig, Hoffman, Lipoff, Rosen & Quentel and Stevan J. Pardo and David T. Azrin, Miami, for appellee.
Before JORGENSON, LEVY and GODERICH, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The record fails to reflect any legal basis that would support the entry of the order under review herein. See Lopez-Ortiz v. Centrust Savings Bank, 546 So.2d 1126 (Fla.3d DCA 1989); Oxford International Bank and Trust, Ltd. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 374 So.2d 54 (Fla.3d DCA 1979), cert. dismissed, 383 So.2d 1199 (Fla.1980). Accordingly, the order entered by the trial court on June 1, 1992, requiring the appellants "... to return the boat . or to post a bond ." is reversed, with this cause being remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Reversed and remanded.