Case Name: Abdullah SMITH, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2007-09-18
Citations: 232 S.W.3d 730
Docket Number: No. ED 89144
Parties: Abdullah SMITH, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 232
Pages: 730–730

Head Matter:
Abdullah SMITH, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 89144.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Sept. 18, 2007.
Gwenda R. Robinson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Lisa M. Kennedy, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Abdullah Smith, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that there was not a factual basis for his guilty plea to drug trafficking in the second degree.
The motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).