Case Name: Sidney B. HARR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard H. BRODHEAD, President; Duke University, c/o Pamela J. Bernard, General Counsel; Associated Press; David F. Levi, Dean, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-12-22
Citations: 672 F. App'x 252
Docket Number: No. 16-1846
Parties: Sidney B. HARR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard H. BRODHEAD, President; Duke University, c/o Pamela J. Bernard, General Counsel; Associated Press; David F. Levi, Dean, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 672
Pages: 252–253

Head Matter:
Sidney B. HARR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard H. BRODHEAD, President; Duke University, c/o Pamela J. Bernard, General Counsel; Associated Press; David F. Levi, Dean, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-1846
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: December 20, 2016
Decided: December 22, 2016
Sidney B. Harr, Appellant Pro Se.
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Sidney B. Harr appeals the district court's order dismissing on res judicata grounds his civil action against Defendants, and imposing a prefiling injunction against and sanctions on Harr. We have reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Harr v. Brodhead, No. 1:16-cv-00304-CCE-JLW (M.D.N.C. June 30, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED