Case Name: BISHOP v. ALLEN et al.
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1924-09-23
Citations: 102 Okla. 285
Docket Number: No. 15209
Parties: BISHOP v. ALLEN et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 102
Pages: 285–285

Head Matter:
BISHOP v. ALLEN et al.
No. 15209
Opinion Filed Sept. 23, 1924.
(Syllabus.)
Appeal and Error — Case-Made — Time—Expiration.
Where no extension of time is given in which to sei've case-made and the statutory period of 15 days has expired, the trial court has no jurisdiction to grant an extension of time and the Supreme Court acquires no jurisdiction to review the case on appeal.
Error from District Court, Oklahoma County.
Action between Rose Bishop and T. D. Allen and another. From the judgment, the former appeals.
Dismissed.
McCaffrey & Smith, for plaintiff in error.
Freeling, Hood & Howard, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this case, defendant in error moves the court to dismiss the appeal for the reason that the case-made was not served within the valid extension of time. The order from which the appeal was taken was made on the 25th day of September, 1923, and the time was not extended in which to serve case-made. Case-made was not served within the statutory period of 15 days, but on the 9th day of November, 1923, the trial court extended the time 60. days. This order is void for want of jurisdiction on the part of the trial court to make this extension, and this court has no jurisdiction to review the case. The appeal is dismissed.