Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Neville Sylvester LESLIE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-03-09
Citations: 122 F. App'x 686
Docket Number: No. 04-8030
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Neville Sylvester LESLIE, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 122
Pages: 686–686

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Neville Sylvester LESLIE, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 04-8030.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 24, 2005.
Decided: March 9, 2005.
Neville Sylvester Leslie, Appellant pro se.
Thomas More Hollenhorst, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Neville Sylvester Leslie appeals the district court's order denying relief on his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a)(1) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Leslie, No. CR-98-152 (E.D. Va. filed Dec. 17, 2004 & entered Dec. 20, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED