Case Name: Mansfield DINKINS, III, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HUNT CONSTRUCTION GROUP, Defendant, Jenkins Construction, Incorporated, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-03-07
Citations: 268 F. App'x 437
Docket Number: No. 07-1489
Parties: Mansfield DINKINS, III, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HUNT CONSTRUCTION GROUP, Defendant, Jenkins Construction, Incorporated, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 268
Pages: 437–438

Head Matter:
Mansfield DINKINS, III, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HUNT CONSTRUCTION GROUP, Defendant, Jenkins Construction, Incorporated, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-1489.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
March 7, 2008.
Before: NORRIS, BATCHELDER, and GIBBONS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM.
Defendant Jenkins Construction, Inc. appeals from the order of the district court denying the corporation's motion to set aside the entry of a default and default judgment against it.
Having had the benefit of oral argument and having carefully considered the record on appeal, the briefs of the parties, and the applicable law, we are not persuaded that the district court erred in adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying defendant's motion to set aside default and default judgment.
Because the reasoning which supports the district court's order has been articulated by the magistrate judge and the district court, the issuance of a detailed written opinion by this court would serve no useful purpose. Accordingly, the order of the district court is affirmed upon the reasoning employed by the magistrate judge in his .report and recommendation dated October 27, 2006, and by the district court in its order dated March 15, 2007, 2007 WL 836659.