Case Name: Susan J. BOWMAN, Appellant, v. Ted K. BOWMAN, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1987-04-03
Citations: 504 So. 2d 808
Docket Number: No. 86-1693
Parties: Susan J. BOWMAN, Appellant, v. Ted K. BOWMAN, Appellee.
Judges: SCHEB, A.C.J., and SANDERLIN, J., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 504
Pages: 808–809

Head Matter:
Susan J. BOWMAN, Appellant, v. Ted K. BOWMAN, Appellee.
No. 86-1693.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
April 3, 1987.
John M. Strickland of Livingston, Patterson & Strickland, Sarasota, for appellant.
Edwin T. Mulock and Lucinda Meekins Stathis of Law Office of Mulock & Birk-hold, Bradenton, for appellee.

Opinion:
HALL, Judge.
We find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding the wife rehabilitative alimony. The facts of this case do not warrant an award of permanent alimony at this time. However, should the wife not become rehabilitated prior to the expiration of the rehabilitative alimony period, she may file a petition to continue the rehabilitative alimony or convert it to permanent alimony. Lee v. Lee, 309 So.2d 26 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975).
Affirmed.
SCHEB, A.C.J., and SANDERLIN, J., concur.