Case Name: Laurence Pollock, Trading as Pollock Pharmacy, Respondent, v. Paul H. Pollock, Inc., et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1953-11-10
Citations: 282 A.D. 930
Docket Number: 
Parties: Laurence Pollock, Trading as Pollock Pharmacy, Respondent, v. Paul H. Pollock, Inc., et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 282
Pages: 930–930

Head Matter:
Laurence Pollock, Trading as Pollock Pharmacy, Respondent, v. Paul H. Pollock, Inc., et al., Appellants.

Opinion:
Judgment unanimously reversed and the complaint dismissed upon the ground that the evidence fails to disclose any fraud, misrepresentation, deceit, unfairness, or palming off by defendants, and that there was no proof of confusion or likelihood of confusion on the part of the public, or other proof of unfair trade on the part of defendants. Settle order on notice. Present - — Peck, P. J., Dore, Callahan, Breitel and Bastow, JJ. [See post, p. 932.]