Case Name: Falecia CHRISTOPHER, Appellant, v. James M. HANKINS, Craig S. Winney, American National Property & Casualty Insurance Company, Defendants, The Printing Press, Inc., Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-04-27
Citations: 133 S.W.3d 540
Docket Number: No. ED 83431
Parties: Falecia CHRISTOPHER, Appellant, v. James M. HANKINS, Craig S. Winney, American National Property & Casualty Insurance Company, Defendants, The Printing Press, Inc., Respondent.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 133
Pages: 540–540

Head Matter:
Falecia CHRISTOPHER, Appellant, v. James M. HANKINS, Craig S. Winney, American National Property & Casualty Insurance Company, Defendants, The Printing Press, Inc., Respondent.
No. ED 83431.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
April 27, 2004.
Rick A. Courtney, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Dean R. Gallego, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Falecia Christopher appeals from the trial court's denial of her motion for new trial. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).