Case Name: Diana E. Wiesner, Also Known as Diana D. Dubroff, Respondent, v. Vic Tanny Gyms, Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1963-01-07
Citations: 18 A.D.2d 816
Docket Number: 
Parties: Diana E. Wiesner, Also Known as Diana D. Dubroff, Respondent, v. Vic Tanny Gyms, Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 18
Pages: 816–816

Head Matter:
Diana E. Wiesner, Also Known as Diana D. Dubroff, Respondent, v. Vic Tanny Gyms, Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Opinion:
In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injury allegedly sustained when plaintiff was thrown from a vibrating machine in a gymnasium on the premises of the defendant Vic Tanny Queens, Inc., said defendant and the defendants Vie Tanny Gyms, Inc., and Vic Tanny, Inc., appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated May 7, 1962, which denied the motion made by them and one other defendant for summary judgment dismissing the second amended complaint (Rules Civ. Prae., rule 113). Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements (see Grande v. Torello, 12 A D 2d 937; Krohn v. Steinlauf, 11 A D 2d 695, 696). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.