Case Name: Carl David STENNER, Appellant, v. Paula Sue STENNER, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-04-23
Citations: 75 S.W.3d 840
Docket Number: No. WD 59649
Parties: Carl David STENNER, Appellant, v. Paula Sue STENNER, Respondent.
Judges: Before JAMES M. SMART, JR., P.J.; HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, and JOSEPH M. ELLIS, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 75
Pages: 840–841

Head Matter:
Carl David STENNER, Appellant, v. Paula Sue STENNER, Respondent.
No. WD 59649.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Submitted Dec. 5, 2001.
Decided April 23, 2002.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 28, 2002.
Application for Transfer Denied June 25, 2002.
Arnold Robert Day, Jr., Kansas City, MO, for Appellant.
Thomas E. Hankins, Gladstone, MO, for Respondent.
Before JAMES M. SMART, JR., P.J.; HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, and JOSEPH M. ELLIS, JJ.

Opinion:
Order
PER CURIAM.
Carl David Stenner appeals from the judgment in his dissolution of marriage action, which included a counterclaim brought by his wife under federal and state wiretap laws. Stenner objects to the child custody provisions of the decree, the distribution of marital and non-marital property, and the amount of child support awarded. He also appeals the award of damages entered as to the wiretap claims. Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we conclude the judgment should be affirmed. A published opinion would lack precedential value. A memorandum as to the reasons for our decision has been furnished to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).