Case Name: D. Hauser, Inc. v. United States
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1957-06-25
Citations: 39 Cust. Ct. 553
Docket Number: Reap. Dec. 8884; Entry No. 909482
Parties: D. Hauser, Inc. v. United States
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Volume: 39
Pages: 553–553

Head Matter:
(Reap. Dec. 8884)
Entry No. 909482.
D. Hauser, Inc. v. United States
(Decided June 25, 1957)
Siegel, Mandell & Davidson for the plaintiff.
George Cochran Doub, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Opinion:
Wilson, Judge:
This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:
IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the export value of the merchandise at the time of exportation to the United States covered by the Appeal to Reappraisement enumerated above, limited to merchandise assessed for duty under Paragraph 1518, at which time such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade for export to the United States including costs of containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident placing the merchandise ready for shipment to the United States was the invoice unit values plus cost of packing plus two percent.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher domestic value for merchandise such or similar to the merchandise herein at the time of exportation thereof.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Appeal to Reap-praisement enumerated above may be submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.
On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise assessed for duty under paragraph 1518, and that such values were the invoice unit values, plus cost of packing, plus 2 per centum.
Insofar as the appeal relates to all other merchandise, it is hereby dismissed.
Judgment will be entered accordingly.