Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Malcolm Scott GUILLORY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-06-01
Citations: 471 F. App'x 303
Docket Number: No. 12-30050
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Malcolm Scott GUILLORY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 471
Pages: 303–304

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Malcolm Scott GUILLORY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-30050
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
June 1, 2012.
Cristina Walker, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Shreveport, LA, James Thomas McManus, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Lafayette, LA, for PlaintiffAppellee.
Rebecca Louise Hudsmith, Esq., Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Malcolm Scott Guillory, Jonesville, VA, pro se.
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Malcolm Scott Guillory has moved for leave to withdraw in Guillory's appeal of the district court's order granting his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Guillory has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.