Case Name: Mischelle WEIBLE, Claimant/Respondent, v. MISSOURI BEVERAGE COMPANY, INC., Employer/Appellant, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2011-09-20
Citations: 348 S.W.3d 829
Docket Number: No. ED 96271
Parties: Mischelle WEIBLE, Claimant/Respondent, v. MISSOURI BEVERAGE COMPANY, INC., Employer/Appellant, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 348
Pages: 829–830

Head Matter:
Mischelle WEIBLE, Claimant/Respondent, v. MISSOURI BEVERAGE COMPANY, INC., Employer/Appellant, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent.
No. ED 96271.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Sept. 20, 2011.
Jill R. Rembusch, Summers Compton Wells, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Mischelle Weible, acting pro se, House Springs, MO, for Respondent.
Ninion S. Riley, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent Division of Employment Security.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Missouri Beverage Company, Inc., appeals from the final decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) reversing the award of the Appeals Tribunal, which reversed the previous award by the Division of Employment Security, finding Mischelle Weible was entitled to receive unemployment compensation. We affirm the decision of the Commission.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. The Commission's decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. An extended opinion would have no precedential value or serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).