Case Name: Edward A. SHAY et al., Petitioners, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT, Respondent, Nicholas A. Addams et al., Intervenors
Court: District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Decision Date: 1975-05-07
Citations: 337 A.2d 506
Docket Number: No. 8231
Parties: Edward A. SHAY et al., Petitioners, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT, Respondent, Nicholas A. Addams et al., Intervenors.
Judges: Before KELLY and GALLAGHER, Associate Judges, and PAIR, Associate Judge, Retired.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 337
Pages: 506–507

Head Matter:
Edward A. SHAY et al., Petitioners, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT, Respondent, Nicholas A. Addams et al., Intervenors.
No. 8231.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
May 7, 1975.
Norman M. Glasgow, Whayne S. Quin, Washington, D. C., for petitioners.
Nicholas A. Addams, Washington, D. C., intervenor, in pro per.
Richard W. Barton, Asst. Corp. Counsel, Washington, D. C, for respondent.
Before KELLY and GALLAGHER, Associate Judges, and PAIR, Associate Judge, Retired.

Opinion:
JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.
This cause came on for further consideration following the remand proceedings had pursuant to this Court's order of March 13, 1975. The Court has reviewed the findings and conclusions of the Board set forth in the supplemental record, and considered the memoranda filed by the parties. The Court is of the opinion that the Board's findings and conclusions are supported by substantial evidence in the whole of the administrative record, and that the applicants have not met their required burden to obtain a special exception. See Marjorie Webster Junior College, Inc. v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 309 A.2d 314 and Stewart v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 305 A.2d 516. Wherefore, it is
Ordered and adjudged that the order on review herein be, and the same hereby is, affirmed.