Case Name: Roy LEE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-10-16
Citations: 828 So. 2d 440
Docket Number: No. 2D01-4124
Parties: Roy LEE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ALTENBERND, WHATLEY, and NORTHCUTT, JJ„ concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 828
Pages: 440–441

Head Matter:
Roy LEE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D01-4124.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Oct. 16, 2002.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Roy Lee challenges the trial court's order summarily denying his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm.
In his motion, Lee alleged that his plea was involuntary because defense counsel affirmatively misadvised him regarding the future sentencing-enhancing effects of the plea in regard to an as yet uncommitted crime. In Stansel v. State, 825 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), we held that this claim is not cognizable in a rule 3.850 motion. We certify the same question that we certified in Stansel. We affirm, without dis cussion, any other issues raised by Lee in his motion.
ALTENBERND, WHATLEY, and NORTHCUTT, JJ" concur.