Case Name: Columbus Bar Association v. Tarmey
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1983-04-06
Citations: 4 Ohio St. 3d 81
Docket Number: D.D. No. 83-1
Parties: Columbus Bar Association v. Tarmey.
Judges: Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, O’Neill and Hendrickson, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 4
Pages: 81–82

Head Matter:
Columbus Bar Association v. Tarmey.
[Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Tarmey (1983), 4 Ohio St. 3d 81.]
(D.D. No. 83-1
Decided April 6, 1983.)
Messrs. Brownfield, Bowen & Bally, Mr. James W. Lewis, Messrs. Riley, XJcker & Lavinsky and Mr. Timothy J. Ucker, for relator.
Michael F. Colley Co., L.P.A., and Mr. Frank A. Ray, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Upon a reading and evaluation of all of the evidence presented to the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline, the court determines that the respondent did violate DR 1-102(A)(3) and DR 1-102(A)(4), and accordingly the court concurs in the recommendation of the board.
Therefore, it is the judgment of the court that the respondent, Thomas P. Tarmey, is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law.
Judgment accordingly.
Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, O'Neill and Hendrickson, JJ., concur.
O'Neill, J., of the Seventh Appellate District, sitting for C. Brown, J.
Hendrickson, J., of the Twelfth Appellate District, sitting for J.P. Celebrezze, J.