Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Curtis ARNOLD, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-10-26
Citations: 348 F. App'x 878
Docket Number: No. 09-6944
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Curtis ARNOLD, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 348
Pages: 878–878

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Curtis ARNOLD, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-6944.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 20, 2009.
Decided: Oct. 26, 2009.
Curtis Arnold, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas A. O’Malley, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Curtis Arnold appeals the district court's order denying relief on his motion to amend his presentence report. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Arnold, No. 3:05-cr-00046-RJC-DSC-2 (W.D.N.C. May 13, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.