Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Felipe Diaz, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1986-10-14
Citations: 123 A.D.2d 713
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Felipe Diaz, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 123
Pages: 713–714

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Felipe Diaz, Appellant.

Opinion:
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rubin, J.), rendered August 25, 1982, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts), and robbery in the second degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
There is no merit to the defendant's contention that a prearrest photographic identification by an eyewitness was improper simply because a physical lineup, the preferred procedure, was not employed (see, People v Garcia, 115 AD2d 617). The record does not establish that the photographic identification procedure utilized was in any way suggestive.
We have reviewed defendant's other claims and find them to be without merit. Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.