Case Name: Judith A. BUNNELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J.C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-03-17
Citations: 319 F. App'x 821
Docket Number: No. 08-13464
Parties: Judith A. BUNNELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J.C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before BARKETT and FAY, Circuit Judges, and TRAGER, District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 319
Pages: 821–822

Head Matter:
Judith A. BUNNELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J.C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 08-13464
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
March 17, 2009.
Erika Deutsch Rotbart, Deutsch Rot-bart & Associates, P.A., Boca Raton, FL, Craig L. Berman, Berman Law Firm, P.A., Saint Petersburg, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Nicholas Alban O’Kelly, J.C. Penney Company, Inc., Plano, TX, Susan L. Dolin, Susan L. Dolin PA, Pembroke Pnes, FL, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before BARKETT and FAY, Circuit Judges, and TRAGER, District Judge.
Honorable David G. Trager, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Judith Bunnell appeals from an adverse summary judgment in favor of J.C. Penney on her complaint alleging age discrimination, in violation of the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, Fla. Stat. § 760.10(l)(a) ("FCRA"). The parties do not dispute that Bunnell established a prima facie case. The only issue here is whether the district court erred in granting Penney's motion for summary judgment on the basis that Penney's reason for terminating Bun-nell's employment was not a pretext for age discrimination.
Upon review of the record, we find disputed issues of material fact that preclude summary judgment. Thus, we vacate the summary judgment and remand for further proceedings.
VACATED and REMANDED.