Case Name: DAVID SOLINGER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. HENRY R. EGELSTON and OSCAR C. WHEELER, Impleaded, Defendants and Respondents
Court: New York Superior Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1879-06-13
Citations: 13 Jones & S. 605
Docket Number: 
Parties: DAVID SOLINGER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. HENRY R. EGELSTON and OSCAR C. WHEELER, Impleaded, Defendants and Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Reports of cases argued and determined in the Superior Court of the city of New York
Volume: 45
Pages: 605–606

Head Matter:
DAVID SOLINGER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. HENRY R. EGELSTON and OSCAR C. WHEELER, Impleaded, Defendants and Respondents.
Before Sedgwick and Speir, JJ.
Decided June 13, 1879.
Appeal from judgment in favor of defendants on two demurrers, severally interposed by them to complaint.
A. R. Dyett, for appellant.
Scott & Bird, for respondents.

Opinion:
By the Court.—Sedgwick, J.
The learned judge below followed the decision of Solinger v. Earle, impleaded, &c. (ante, p. 80), and his judgment must be sustained. There has been at this term a motion for re-argument in Solinger v. Earle, which we have denied (ante, p. 604).
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Speir, J., concurred.