Case Name: Arthur MILLINER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1973-10-24
Citations: 284 So. 2d 231
Docket Number: No. 72-129
Parties: Arthur MILLINER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: HOBSON, A. C. J., and McNULTY and BOARDMAN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 284
Pages: 231–232

Head Matter:
Arthur MILLINER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 72-129.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Oct. 24, 1973.
R. C. Langford, Bartow, for appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and David Luther Woodward, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Milliner appeals an order denying his re-application for hearing of a motion to vacate sentence under R.Cr.P. 3.850, 33 F. S.A., in which he alleged that his direct appeal had been frustrated by his lack of knowledge of appellate procedure and by his psychiatric instability.
The proper method for raising the issue of deprivation of direct appeal is by petition for writ of habeas corpus. Baggett v. Wainwright, Fla.1969, 229 So.2d 239; State v. Wooden, Fla.1971, 246 So.2d 755; Saunders v. Wainwright, Fla.1971, 254 So.2d 197.
The order appealed is
Affirmed.
HOBSON, A. C. J., and McNULTY and BOARDMAN, JJ., concur.