Case Name: George D. WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Michael T.W. BELL, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-04-18
Citations: 12 F. App'x 126
Docket Number: No. 01-6146
Parties: George D. WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Michael T.W. BELL, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 12
Pages: 126–127

Head Matter:
George D. WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Michael T.W. BELL, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 01-6146.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 12, 2001.
Decided April 18, 2001.
George D. Williams, pro se. Sandra Wal-laee-Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, NC, for appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
George D. Williams seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Williams v. Bell, No. CA-00-307-5-F (E.D.N.C. Jan. 4, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.