Case Name: RANDALL et al. v. DAMPSKIBSSELSKABET DANNEBROG
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1915-11-15
Citations: 228 F. 1022
Docket Number: No. 1346
Parties: RANDALL et al. v. DAMPSKIBSSELSKABET DANNEBROG.
Judges: Before PBITCHABD, KNAPP, and WOODS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter
Volume: 228
Pages: 1022–1022

Head Matter:
RANDALL et al. v. DAMPSKIBSSELSKABET DANNEBROG.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
November 15, 1915.)
No. 1346.
Appeal from the District Court cf the United States for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore; John C. Bose, Judge.
Daniel B. Bandall, of Baltimore, Md. (B. E. Lee Marshall, of Baltimore, Md., on the brief), for appellants.
John M. Woolsey, of New York City (Convers & Kirlin, of New York City, and Bitchie, Janney, Griswold & Hamilton, of Baltimore, Md., on the brief), for appellee.
Before PBITCHABD, KNAPP, and WOODS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PEB CUBIAM.
The facts of this case are fully stated and discussed in the opinion of the court below (217 Fed. 902), and nothing would be gained by repetition. We agree with the learned District Judge that on the whole "the libelant has a little the better of the argument," and are therefore of opinion that the decree appealed from should be affirmed.