Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Okang Kareem ROCHELLE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-07-01
Citations: 328 F. App'x 172
Docket Number: No. 09-6091
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Okang Kareem ROCHELLE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 328
Pages: 172–173

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Okang Kareem ROCHELLE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-6091.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 4, 2009.
Decided: July 1, 2009.
Okang Kareem Rochelle, Appellant Pro Se. Anand P. Ramaswamy, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Okang Kareem Rochelle seeks to appeal the district court's order denying Rochelle's motions to dismiss the indictment for violation of his Sixth Amendment rights. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Rochelle seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.