Case Name: Floyd SAMPA, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-04-19
Citations: 161 S.W.3d 891
Docket Number: No. ED 84466
Parties: Floyd SAMPA, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J. and LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 161
Pages: 891–892

Head Matter:
Floyd SAMPA, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 84466.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
April 19, 2005.
Amanda R. Schehr, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Evan J. Buchheim, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J. and LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Floyd Sampa appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. He contends his attorney failed to inform him that he could receive life imprisonment as a result of his blind pleas of guilty on eighteen of the class A felony charges against him.
Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our deci sion. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).