Case Name: Morris F. Sheppard, Appellant, v. Frank Earle, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1881-10
Citations: 32 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 317
Docket Number: 
Parties: Morris F. Sheppard, Appellant, v. Frank Earle, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Supreme Court Reports (Hun)
Volume: 32
Pages: 317–317

Head Matter:
Morris F. Sheppard, Appellant, v. Frank Earle, Respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide event. Meld, that as the complaint contains sufficient allegations to constitute a cause of action for the recovery of the money paid, on the ground of an entire failure of consideration, all the other allegations may be disregarded, and a recovery may be had on that ground if the evidence warrants it. (33 N. Y., 581; 42 id., 83.) This point was not passed upon on the former appeal, all that was then held being that an action for a breach of warranty could not be maintained upon the facts proved.