Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Juan Carlos HERNANDEZ-GAUDILLO, also known as Juan Caudillo, also known as Juan Gonzales-Hernandez, also known as Juan Trejo, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-12-20
Citations: 707 F. App'x 272
Docket Number: No. 17-50478 Conference Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Juan Carlos HERNANDEZ-GAUDILLO, also known as Juan Caudillo, also known as Juan Gonzales-Hernandez, also known as Juan Trejo, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before JONES, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 707
Pages: 272–273

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Juan Carlos HERNANDEZ-GAUDILLO, also known as Juan Caudillo, also known as Juan Gonzales-Hernandez, also known as Juan Trejo, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
No. 17-50478 Conference Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed December 20, 2017
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Juan Carlos Hernandez-Gaudillo, Pro Se
Before JONES, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Carlos Hernandez-Gau-dillo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hernandez-Gaudillo has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Hernandez-Gaudillo's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014); United States v. Corbett, 742 F.2d 173, 177 (5th Cir. 1984) (per curiam).
We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Hernandez-Gau-dillo's response. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.