Case Name: ROBISON (Prosecuting Attorney) vs. MINER (Police Justice, Detroit), and ROBISON (Prosecuting Attorney) vs. HAUG (Police Justice, Detroit)
Court: Michigan Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Michigan
Decision Date: 1888-03-02
Citations: 1 McGrath 239
Docket Number: 
Parties: ROBISON (Prosecuting Attorney) vs. MINER (Police Justice, Detroit), and ROBISON (Prosecuting Attorney) vs. HAUG (Police Justice, Detroit),
Judges: 
Reporter: Mandamus cases decided in the Supreme court of Michigan
Volume: 1
Pages: 239–239

Head Matter:
ROBISON (Prosecuting Attorney) vs. MINER (Police Justice, Detroit), and ROBISON (Prosecuting Attorney) vs. HAUG (Police Justice, Detroit),
68 M., 549.

Opinion:
To require respondents to entertain jurisdiction to hold preliminary examinations in criminal prosecutions, under the liquor law of 1887, it being claimed that the statute contains unconstitutional provisions and is therefore invalid.
Granted in the first named case, March 2, 1888, but denied in the last named, because the application to Judge Haug. set out no offense in proper terms.