Case Name: Nathan Heymann and Joseph R. Rolnick, Respondents, v. Max J. Jacobs and Max J. Jacobs, Inc., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1931-01
Citations: 232 A.D. 697
Docket Number: 
Parties: Nathan Heymann and Joseph R. Rolnick, Respondents, v. Max J. Jacobs and Max J. Jacobs, Inc., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 232
Pages: 697–697

Head Matter:
Nathan Heymann and Joseph R. Rolnick, Respondents, v. Max J. Jacobs and Max J. Jacobs, Inc., Appellants.

Opinion:
Judgment reversed upon the law and the facts, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs, upon the ground that the verdict was contrary to the evidence. Appeal from order denying motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial dismissed. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.