Case Name: In the Matter of Michael Green, Petitioner, v. Allyn R. Sielaff, as Correction Commissioner of the City of New York, et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1993-11-16
Citations: 198 A.D.2d 113
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Michael Green, Petitioner, v Allyn R. Sielaff, as Correction Commissioner of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 198
Pages: 113–113

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Michael Green, Petitioner, v Allyn R. Sielaff, as Correction Commissioner of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.
[603 NYS2d 156]

Opinion:
—Determination of respondent Correction Commissioner, dated October 9, 1991, which dismissed petitioner from his position with the Correction Department is unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Stuart C. Cohen, J.], entered March 27, 1992), is dismissed without costs or disbursements.
Upon review of the record, we find that there is substantial evidence to support the determination that petitioner violated the Department Rules and Regulations by unlawfully ingesting cocaine. Petitioner raised an affirmative defense of unknowing ingestion and contended that his positive test results came from unwittingly drinking liquor which had been spiked with cocaine at a bachelor party two days prior to the drug test. At the hearing, the party's bartender testified that he had spiked three bottles of liquor with cocaine and that he could have served petitioner from one of the spiked bottles. The Hearing Officer however, rejected the affirmative defense because petitioner's evidence only established a possibility that his positive test was the result of unknowing ingestion, but that petitioner did not meet his burden of persuasion. We find no reason to disturb the findings of the Hearing Officer as to the material question of fact (see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, 231). Concur — Carro, J. P., Rosenberger, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.