Case Name: Michael Larkin et al., respondents, v. Rudolph A. Koether, appellant
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1928-02-06
Citations: 102 N.J. Eq. 329
Docket Number: 
Parties: Michael Larkin et al., respondents, v. Rudolph A. Koether, appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 102
Pages: 329–329

Head Matter:
Michael Larkin et al., respondents, v. Rudolph A. Koether, appellant.
[Decided February 6th, 1928.]
Messrs. Lum, Tamblyn & Golyer, for the respondents.
Mr. Frank F. Bradner, for the appellant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Yice-Chaneellor Berry, and reported in 101 N. J. Fq. 116.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, Yan Buskirk, MoGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
For modification — White, J. 1.