Case Name: JESSIE WRIGHTSMAN HOVERSTOCK v. JOHN C. ROGERS et al., Appellants
Court: Supreme Court of Missouri
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1912-02-06
Citations: 239 Mo. 430
Docket Number: 
Parties: JESSIE WRIGHTSMAN HOVERSTOCK v. JOHN C. ROGERS et al., Appellants.
Judges: Bond, G. (sitting in Division Two when this case was argned), concurs.
Reporter: Missouri Reports
Volume: 239
Pages: 430–431

Head Matter:
JESSIE WRIGHTSMAN HOVERSTOCK v. JOHN C. ROGERS et al., Appellants.
Division Two,
February 6, 1912.
The facts in this case are the same as those in the case of Wrights-man v. Rogers, ante, p. 417, and this case is decided upon tn« authority of that.
Appeal from Christian Circuit Court. — Ron. Argun Cox, Judge.
Reversed and remanded (with directions).
G. A. Watson for appellants.
Addison Brown for respondent.

Opinion:
ROT, C.
— The facts in this case are in all respects the same as in the case of Ora "Wrightsman v. John 0. Rogers, the same defendant (ante, p. 417).
Our opinion in this case is the same as in than
The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to proceed with the cause in accord-' anee with the opinion in that case.
Bond, G. (sitting in Division Two when this case was argned), concurs.
PER CURIAM.
— The foregoing opinion of Roy, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court.
All the judges concur.