Case Name: Rodney THOMPSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dr. KOFOED; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-04-18
Citations: 8 F. App'x 649
Docket Number: No. 99-16956; D.C. No. CV 95-01745 WBS/JFM
Parties: Rodney THOMPSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dr. KOFOED; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 8
Pages: 649–650

Head Matter:
Rodney THOMPSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dr. KOFOED; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 99-16956.
D.C. No. CV 95-01745 WBS/JFM.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 9, 2001 .
Decided April 18, 2001.
Before CANBY, KOZINSKI, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, we deny Thompson’s request for oral argument.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Rodney L. Thompson, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's judgment for defendants following a jury trial on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim alleging deliberate indifference to serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the jury's verdict to determine whether it is supported by substantial evidence and affirm. See Three Boys Music Corp. v. Bolton, 212 F.3d 477, 482 (9th Cir.2000), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 121 S.Ct. 881, 148 L.Ed.2d 790 (2001); McGuckin v. Smith, 974 F.2d 1050, 1059 (9th Cir.1992), overruled on other grounds, WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.