Case Name: ALBERT C. D'ALOIA ET AL., RELATORS, v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1924-06-25
Citations: 2 N.J. Misc. 620
Docket Number: 
Parties: ALBERT C. D’ALOIA ET AL., RELATORS, v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 2
Pages: 620–620

Head Matter:
ALBERT C. D’ALOIA ET AL., RELATORS, v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT.
Argued May 7, 1924
Decided June 25, 1924.
Civil Service — True Construction of L. 1908, p. 235, § 26.
For writ of mandamus.
Before Justices Kalisch, Black and Campbell.
For the relators, Ernest L. Quacicenbush.
For the defendant, Edward L. Katzenbach, attorney-general of New Jersey.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
A rule was granted in this case why a peremptory or alternative writ of mandamus should not issue out of the court, directed to- the civil service commission of New Jersey. The point involved is the true construction of a section of the Civil Service act (Pamph. L. 1908, p. 235. ¶ 26), and a supplement thereto (Pamph. L. 1918, p. 158), a salary regulation which is known as the classification and standardization plan. This statute is of state-wide application and of general public interest. We think the alternative writ should issue, and it is so ordered.