Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John D. RIDDICK, Sr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-02-06
Citations: 508 F. App'x 283
Docket Number: No. 12-7669
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John D. RIDDICK, Sr., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING, GREGORY, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 508
Pages: 283–283

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John D. RIDDICK, Sr., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-7669.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 28, 2013.
Decided: Feb. 6, 2013.
John D. Riddick, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Michael Comstock, Office of the United States Attorney, Joseph Evan De-Padilla, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before KING, GREGORY, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
John D. Riddick, Sr., appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. United States v. Riddick, No. 2:00-cr-00067-AWA-2 (E.D.Va. Sept. 14, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.