Case Name: Joseph A. ASTA, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2019-06-18
Citations: 577 S.W.3d 180
Docket Number: ED 106521
Parties: Joseph A. ASTA, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J. and Mary K. Hoff, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 577
Pages: 180–180

Head Matter:
Joseph A. ASTA, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
ED 106521
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Filed: June 18, 2019
FOR APPELLANT; Alexandria A. Shah, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101.
FOR RESPONDENT: Julia E. Rives, Assistant Attorney General, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.
Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J. and Mary K. Hoff, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Joseph A. Asta ("Movant") entered a guilty plea to one count of felony burglary, one count of felony receiving stolen property, and twelve counts of felony unlawful possession of a firearm. Movant filed an amended motion to withdraw his guilty plea under Rule 24.035 claiming his plea attorneys promised he would be eligible for and sentenced to the St. Louis City drug court program. The motion court considered and denied the amended motion. We affirm the denial because the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment under 84.16(b).