Case Name: Noble, Appellant, v. McMaken, Appellee
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1976-03-10
Citations: 45 Ohio St. 2d 236
Docket Number: No. 75-1041
Parties: Noble, Appellant, v. McMaken, Appellee.
Judges: O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, Celebrezze:, W. Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Second Series
Volume: 45
Pages: 236–237

Head Matter:
Noble, Appellant, v. McMaken, Appellee.
[Cite as Noble v. McMaken (1976), 45 Ohio St. 2d 236.]
(No. 75-1041
Decided March 10, 1976.)
Mr. Augustus L. Ross III, for appellant.
Mr. Robert J. Huffman, prosecuting attorney,- for appellee. ' ’

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
In Freeman v. Maxwell (1965), 4 Ohio St. 2d 4, this court held' "that-the availability of the post-conviction remedies provided by Sections 2953.21 to>2953.24, inclusive, Revised Code, is ground for denial of" a writ of habeas corpus.
Accordingly, on authority of Freeman v. Maxwell, supra, and for the reasons stated therein, the judgment of the Court of Appeals, dismissing appellant's complaint for a writ of habeas corpus, is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
O'Neill, C. J., Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, Celebrezze:, W. Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.