Case Name: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Theodore J. MOTT, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1986-05-22
Citations: 488 So. 2d 535
Docket Number: No. 67278
Parties: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Theodore J. MOTT, Respondent.
Judges: BOYD, C.J., and ADKINS, OVERTON and McDONALD, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 488
Pages: 535–535

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Theodore J. MOTT, Respondent.
No. 67278.
Supreme Court of Florida.
May 22, 1986.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Richard W. Prospect, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for petitioner.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender and Nancye R. Crouch, Asst. Public Defender, Seventh Judicial Circuit, Daytona Beach, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We granted review of Mott v. State, 469 So.2d 946 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985), because of direct and express conflict with State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985). Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.
We quash the decision below and remand for proceedings consistent with Jackson.
It is so ordered.
BOYD, C.J., and ADKINS, OVERTON and McDONALD, JJ., concur.
BARKETT, J., concurs specially with an opinion, in which EHRLICH, J., concurs.
SHAW, J., dissents with an opinion.