Case Name: Charles S. ZITO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-11-06
Citations: 682 So. 2d 675
Docket Number: No. 96-2024
Parties: Charles S. ZITO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: DELL, KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 682
Pages: 675–675

Head Matter:
Charles S. ZITO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 96-2024.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Nov. 6, 1996.
Charles S. Zito, Belle Glade, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carol Cobourn Asbury, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court's denial of appellant's Rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. However, as in Freeman v. State, 679 So.2d 364 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), we certify to the supreme court the following question as-oné of great public importance:
IS STATE V. GRAY, 654 So.2d 552 (Fla.1995) RETROACTIVE?
AFFIRMED.
DELL, KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.