Case Name: U.S. v. Michael A. Cisneros
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-12-21
Citations: 71 M.J. 10
Docket Number: No. 12-0106/AF
Parties: U.S. v. Michael A. Cisneros.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Military Justice Reporter
Volume: 71
Pages: 10–10

Head Matter:
No. 12-0106/AF.
U.S. v. Michael A. Cisneros.

Opinion:
CCA S31871. Review granted on the following issue:
WHERE A SPECIFICATION CHARGED UNDER ARTICLE 134, UCMJ, FAILS TO STATE AN OFFENSE UNDER UNITED STATES v. FOSLER, 70 M.J. 225 (C.A.A.F. 2011), BY NOT INCLUDING THE TERMINAL ELEMENTS FOR CLAUSE 1 OR 2, CAN AN ACCUSED PROVIDENTLY PLEAD GUILTY TO SUCH A SPECIFICATION WHERE HE FAILS TO OBJECT TO THE SPECIFICATION AT TRIAL, WHERE THE MILITARY JUDGE ADVISES THE ACCUSED OF THE TERMINAL ELEMENTS DURING THE PROVIDENCE INQUIRY, AND THE ACCUSED ADMITS TO ALL THE ELEMENTS?
Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.