Case Name: Oscar FUCHSLOCHER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1997-02-26
Citations: 110 F.3d 1394
Docket Number: No. 96-17114
Parties: Oscar FUCHSLOCHER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before: REINHARDT, HALL, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 110
Pages: 1394–1394

Head Matter:
Oscar FUCHSLOCHER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 96-17114.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 26, 1997.
Decided Feb. 26, 1997.
Order Published March 20, 1997.
Dorothea P. Kraeger, Phoenix, AZ, for plaintiff-appellant.
Hugh G. Mullane, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for defendant-appellee.
Before: REINHARDT, HALL, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.
Before: REINHARDT, HALL, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously agrees that this case is appropriate for submission without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Ninth Cir.R. 34 — 4.

Opinion:
ORDER
This case is hereby removed from the calendar for March 6, 1997, in San Francisco, California, and deemed submitted without oral argument as of this date.
The case is remanded to the district court with instructions to conduct a hearing on the merits of whether the court should grant a stay of deportation and to make the ruling before April 1, 1997. The district court currently has jurisdiction. See Lalani v. Perryman, 105 F.3d 334 (7th Cir.1997).