Case Name: Carman Williams MURRAY, a/k/a Carman Y. Williams, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Julius MURRAY, Sr., Defendant-Appellee, and Marne Sherman; Sherman & Bouknight, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-04-22
Citations: 94 F. App'x 995
Docket Number: No. 04-1229
Parties: Carman Williams MURRAY, a/k/a Carman Y. Williams, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Julius MURRAY, Sr., Defendant—Appellee, and Marne Sherman; Sherman & Bouknight, Defendants.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 94
Pages: 995–996

Head Matter:
Carman Williams MURRAY, a/k/a Carman Y. Williams, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Julius MURRAY, Sr., Defendant—Appellee, and Marne Sherman; Sherman & Bouknight, Defendants.
No. 04-1229.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. ■
Submitted April 15, 2004.
Decided April 22, 2004.
Carman Williams Murray, Appellant pro se.
Julius Murray, Sr., Appellee pro se.
Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Carman Williams Murray appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to grant summary judgment to Julius Murray and dismiss her tort claims as meritless. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Murray v. Murray, No. CA-02-1050-322BD (D.S.C. Feb. 13, 2004). We deny the Appellant's motion to strike Appellee's brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED