Case Name: Ann CHERUBINI, Ad Prosequendum and as General Administratrix of the Estate of Peter John Cherubini, Deceased, Appellant, v. James SZILAGYI and Arthur S. Carr
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1959-11-10
Citations: 271 F.2d 900
Docket Number: No. 12916
Parties: Ann CHERUBINI, Ad Prosequendum and as General Administratrix of the Estate of Peter John Cherubini, Deceased, Appellant, v. James SZILAGYI and Arthur S. Carr.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 271
Pages: 900–900

Head Matter:
Ann CHERUBINI, Ad Prosequendum and as General Administratrix of the Estate of Peter John Cherubini, Deceased, Appellant, v. James SZILAGYI and Arthur S. Carr.
No. 12916.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued Oct. 29, 1959.
Decided Nov. 10, 1959.
Jerome S. Lieb, Newark, N. J. (Har-kavy & Lieb, Newark, N. J., of counsel with appellant, on the brief), for appellant.
Victor C. Hansen, Newark, N. J. (Mead, Gleeson, Hansen & Pantages and Joseph A. darken, Jr., Newark, N. J., on the brief), for appellee.
Before GOODRICH and KALODNER, Circuit Judges, and WOOD, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a judgment for the defendant in a negligence case. The plaintiff's intestate was hurt and subsequently died as a result of a collision with a car driven by defendant. There is no question of law involved. The only issues ai-e those of fact. The plaintiff argues that the defendant's testimony should not be believed. This was a jury question; the jury answered it in defendant's favor and the trial judge denied the motion for a new trial. There is no basis for reversal.
The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.