Case Name: In the Matter of Lasuree A.B. Catholic Guardian Services, Respondent; Carla S.B., Appellant, et al., Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2016-07-13
Citations: 141 A.D.3d 578
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Lasuree A.B. Catholic Guardian Services, Respondent; Carla S.B., Appellant, et al., Respondent.
Judges: Rivera, J.R, Balkin, Hinds-Radix and Barros, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 141
Pages: 578–579

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Lasuree A.B. Catholic Guardian Services, Respondent; Carla S.B., Appellant, et al., Respondent.
[34 NYS3d 900]-

Opinion:
Appeal from an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Lillian Wan, J.), dated May 14, 2015. The order of fact-finding and disposition, after fact-finding and dispositional hearings, found that the mother permanently neglected the subject child, terminated her parental rights, and transferred guardianship and custody of the child to the petitioner, Catholic Guardian Services, and to the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York for the purpose of adoption.
Ordered that the order of fact-finding and disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The petitioner, Catholic Guardian Services, commenced this proceeding, inter alia, to terminate the mother's parental rights to the subject child on the ground of permanent neglect. After fact-finding and dispositional hearings, the Family Court found that the mother permanently neglected the child, terminated her parental rights, and transferred guardianship and custody of the child to the petitioner and the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York for the purpose of adoption. The mother appeals, contending that the court should have entered a suspended judgment.
The Family Court properly terminated the mother's parental rights, rather than entering a suspended judgment. The evidence adduced at the dispositional hearing established that termination of the mother's parental rights was in the best interests of the child (see Matter of Anastasia R. [Jessica R.], 133 AD3d 605 [2015]). A suspended judgment was not appropriate given the mother's failure to acknowledge and address the issues preventing the child's return to her care (see Matter of Dupree J.P. [Richard P], 128 AD3d 967, 968 [2015]; Matter of Aaliyah L.C. [Jamie A.], 128 AD3d 955, 956 [2015]; Matter of Zechariah J. [Valrick J.], 84 AD3d 1087, 1088 [2011]; Matter of Amber D.C. [Angelica C.], 79 AD3d 865, 866 [2010]).
Rivera, J.R, Balkin, Hinds-Radix and Barros, JJ., concur.