Case Name: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. FISS CORPORATION (INTERNATIONAL LADIES HANDBAG, LUGGAGE, BELT AND NOVELTY WORKERS' UNION, A. F. OF L., et al., Intervenors)
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1943-06-30
Citations: 136 F.2d 990
Docket Number: No. 8344
Parties: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. FISS CORPORATION (INTERNATIONAL LADIES HANDBAG, LUGGAGE, BELT AND NOVELTY WORKERS’ UNION, A. F. OF L., et al., Intervenors).
Judges: Before MARIS, JONES, and GOODRICH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 136
Pages: 990–991

Head Matter:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. FISS CORPORATION (INTERNATIONAL LADIES HANDBAG, LUGGAGE, BELT AND NOVELTY WORKERS’ UNION, A. F. OF L., et al., Intervenors).
No. 8344.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Argued June 21, 1943.
Decided June 30, 1943.
A. Norman Somers, N. L. R. B. of Washington, D. C. (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Howard Lichtenstein, Asst. Gen. Counsel, all of Washington, D. C., and Richard A. Perkins, of San Francisco, Cal., and Margaret M. Farmer, of Washington, D. C., Attys., National Labor Relations Board, on the brief), for petitioner.
Sidney E. Cohn, of New York City, for Pocketbook Workers Union.
Richard M. Monfried, of New York City (Monfried & Monfried, of New York City, on the brief), for respondent.
Max H. Frankie, of New York City, for International Ladies Handbag, etc., Union.
Before MARIS, JONES, and GOODRICH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
No question of law arising under the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq., is presented in this case which has not been previously considered and settled either in the decisions of this Court or elsewhere. There is, therefore, no occasion for elaboration of previously settled rules. The record has been fully examined with regard to the allegations of fact and the testimony has been reviewed in detail. We find that the Board's conclusions are supported by substantial evidence. Petition for enforcement will be granted and an order may be submitted.