Case Name: IN RE: Marco STRICKLAND, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-02-26
Citations: 712 F. App'x 310
Docket Number: No. 17-2452
Parties: IN RE: Marco STRICKLAND, Petitioner.
Judges: Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 712
Pages: 310–311

Head Matter:
IN RE: Marco STRICKLAND, Petitioner.
No. 17-2452
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: February 22, 2018
Decided: February 26, 2018
Marco Strickland, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Marco Strickland petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court's docket reveals that the district court, on December 29, 2017, dismissed Strickland's petition for lack of jurisdiction or, alternatively, for failure to state a claim. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Strickland's case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED