Case Name: Charles Christopher HAYES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2003-04-28
Citations: 845 So. 2d 950
Docket Number: No. 1D02-3339
Parties: Charles Christopher HAYES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: KAHN, VAN NORTWICK, and BROWNING, JJ„ concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 845
Pages: 950–950

Head Matter:
Charles Christopher HAYES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D02-3339.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
April 28, 2003.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Charlie Crist, Attorney General, and Karen M. Holland, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This direct criminal appeal was brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Having reviewed the entire record, we agree that no reversible error occurred and affirm the revocation of the appellant's probation, and imposition of judgment and sentence. However, the trial court technically erred by entering a written Order of Revocation of Probation in which the trial court found that the appellant had violated four conditions of probation, when the appellant only admitted to violating two counts and the state chose not to pursue the remaining counts. Accordingly, we remand for correction of the written order of revocation. See Curl v. State, 823 So.2d 214 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). The appellant need not be present.
AFFIRMED.
KAHN, VAN NORTWICK, and BROWNING, JJ" concur.