Case Name: In re BARCELOUX. MARYLAND CASUALTY CO. v. BUFFUM et al.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1934-12-03
Citations: 74 F.2d 288
Docket Number: No. 7329
Parties: In re BARCELOUX. MARYLAND CASUALTY CO. v. BUFFUM et al.
Judges: Before WILBUR, SAWTELLE, and GARRECHT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 74
Pages: 288–295

Head Matter:
In re BARCELOUX. MARYLAND CASUALTY CO. v. BUFFUM et al.
No. 7329.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Dec. 3, 1934.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 7, 1935.
John Ralph Wilson and Milton New-mark, both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.
Devlin & Devlin, of Sacramento, Cal., for appellee Buffum.
Horace B. Wulfli, of Sacramento, CaL, for appellee Devlin & Devlin.
Before WILBUR, SAWTELLE, and GARRECHT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
GARRECHT, Circuit Judge.
In this case now on appeal to this court, the appellees appeared generally and filed briefs discussing the ease upon the merits, and the matter was argued by all parties in open court and taken under submission. Thereafter appellees filed a motion to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that the court had no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal of the Maryland Casualty Company, which is also a creditor, for the reason that the right to appeal from the order allowing fees must be prosecuted by the trustee, or, in the event that he does not, then by permission given by the court to a creditor, who must appeal in the name of the trustee ; that such permission was not requested, and no such order entered; and that therefore the court is without jurisdiction. In this case the trustee is made a party defendant. It also appears that the order of the District Court appealed from awards costs and interest against appellant, wherein this ease differs from that of Maryland Casualty Co. v. George R. Freeman, Adm'r, etc. (C. C. A.) 71 F.(2d) 1011, and other cases cited by appellee.
Motion to dismiss denied.