Case Name: PENNSBURY VILLAGE ASSOCIATES, LLC, Petitioner v. Aaron McINTYRE, Alma Forsyth and John Doe, Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2009-01-29
Citations: 966 A.2d 547
Docket Number: 
Parties: PENNSBURY VILLAGE ASSOCIATES, LLC, Petitioner v. Aaron McINTYRE, Alma Forsyth and John Doe, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 966
Pages: 547–547

Head Matter:
PENNSBURY VILLAGE ASSOCIATES, LLC, Petitioner v. Aaron McINTYRE, Alma Forsyth and John Doe, Respondents.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Jan. 29, 2009.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 29th day of January 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as framed by Petitioner, are:
1. Did the Commonwealth Court ruling render settlement contracts resolving land use disputes which arguably relate to an environmental law or regulation unenforceable and deprive citizens of the right to resolve them disputes via settlement agreements?
2. Did the Commonwealth Court err in applying and analyzing the Environmental Immunity Act in the instant matter in which the purposes of the Act were not implicated?
3. Did the Commonwealth Court misapply the Environmental Immunity Act by holding that a deed restriction is an environmental law or regulation?
4. Did the Commonwealth Court err in applying and analyzing the Environmental Immunity Act by holding that the business relationship exception to the Act did not apply to this case?