Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Tamell CAMPBELL, Appellant.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2018-02-06
Citations: 539 S.W.3d 120
Docket Number: No. ED 105046
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent,
v.
Tamell CAMPBELL, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 539
Pages: 120–121

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent,
v.
Tamell CAMPBELL, Appellant.
No. ED 105046
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Filed: February 6, 2018
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: Kristina S. Olson, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.
ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Christine K. Lesicko, Asst. Attorney General, P. O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899.
Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J. and Sherri B. Sullivan and Kurt S. Odenwald, JJ.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Tamell Campbell appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions after a jury trial for murder in the first degree and armed criminal action. The trial court did not clearly err in sustaining the State's challenge to the defendant's peremptory strike under Batson v. Kentucky , 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). We affirm.
An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).