Case Name: Barbara Eisen, Respondent, v. Max Eisen, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1995-01-17
Citations: 211 A.D.2d 497
Docket Number: 
Parties: Barbara Eisen, Respondent, v Max Eisen, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 211
Pages: 497–498

Head Matter:
Barbara Eisen, Respondent, v Max Eisen, Appellant.
[621 NYS2d 866]

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Phyllis Gangel-Jacob, J.), entered on or about January 31, 1994, which, to the extent appealed from, granted plaintiff's motion for pendente lite maintenance in the amount of $950.00 per week, and order same court and Justice, entered on or about July 5, 1994, which denied defendant's motion for, inter alia, downward modification and to disqualify plaintiff's counsel, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Considering, among other things, plaintiff's assets, expenses and earning capacity, and defendant's income, we find the award of maintenance pendente lite not to be excessive. Defendant's motion to relieve plaintiff's counsel was properly denied as defendant failed to demonstrate that counsel's testimony would be "necessary" in the pending litigation (H.H.B.K. 45th St. Corp. v Stern, 158 AD2d 395, 396). Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Kupferman, Asch and Rubin, JJ.