Case Name: Jacqueline TEODORO, Appellant, v. Emilio TEODORO, Appellee.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2018-06-06
Citations: 246 So. 3d 565
Docket Number: No. 3D17–830
Parties: Jacqueline TEODORO, Appellant,
v.
Emilio TEODORO, Appellee.
Judges: Before, EMAS, SCALES and LUCK, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 246
Pages: 565–565

Head Matter:
Jacqueline TEODORO, Appellant,
v.
Emilio TEODORO, Appellee.
No. 3D17-830
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Opinion filed June 6, 2018
Rehearing Denied June 28, 2018
John J. Anastasio (Stuart), for appellant.
David L. Margolesky, Miami, for appellee.
Before, EMAS, SCALES and LUCK, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Watt v. Watt, 966 So.2d 455, 458 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) ("Shared parental responsibility assumes that the parties can come to agreement on the welfare of their children. Where the parties cannot and will not come to agreement, the trial court can determine that such an impasse constitutes a substantial change in circumstance, requiring modification of the final judgment in the best interest of the children. Because competent substantial evidence supports the trial court's determinations in this case, we affirm the final judgment of modification.").