Case Name: Fred Lewis WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. c/o STALLARD; c/o Everidge, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-12-02
Citations: 403 F. App'x 797
Docket Number: No. 10-7271
Parties: Fred Lewis WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. c/o STALLARD; c/o Everidge, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 403
Pages: 797–798

Head Matter:
Fred Lewis WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. c/o STALLARD; c/o Everidge, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 10-7271.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 18, 2010.
Decided: Dec. 2, 2010.
Fred Lewis Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Fred Lewis Wilson appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2006) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wilson v. c/o Stallard, No. 7:10-cv-00237-gec-mfu, 2010 WL 3291798 (WD.Va. Aug. 19, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.