Case Name: J. W. WHITTENTON, Sr., et ux., Appellants, v. CITY OF NEW SMYRNA BEACH, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1977-11-04
Citations: 351 So. 2d 738
Docket Number: No. EE-59
Parties: J. W. WHITTENTON, Sr., et ux., Appellants, v. CITY OF NEW SMYRNA BEACH, Appellee.
Judges: ERVIN and MELVIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 351
Pages: 738–738

Head Matter:
J. W. WHITTENTON, Sr., et ux., Appellants, v. CITY OF NEW SMYRNA BEACH, Appellee.
No. EE-59.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nov. 4, 1977.
Rehearing Denied Dec. 1, 1977.
Richard S. Graham of Landis, Graham, French, Husfeld, Sherman & Ford, P. A., Daytona Beach, for appellants.
Charles A. Hall, New Smyrna Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
SMITH, Acting Chief Judge.
Viewed in a light favorable to the City, the evidence supports the trial court's decision that the City is not estopped to enforce its zoning ordinance proscribing the use of appellants' house by paying boarders. The evidence on the elements of estoppel was conflicting and did not establish appellants' right to continued use as a matter of law. City of North Miami v. Margulies, 289 So.2d 424 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974).
AFFIRMED.
ERVIN and MELVIN, JJ., concur.