Case Name: Edward H. Hawke, Respondent, v. Madison Genn Hawke, Individually and as Executor of the Instrument Admitted to Probate as the Will of Edward H. Hawke, Deceased, and Others, Appellants, Impleaded with Another
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1893-12
Citations: 81 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 370
Docket Number: 
Parties: Edward H. Hawke, Respondent, v. Madison Genn Hawke, Individually and as Executor of the Instrument Admitted to Probate as the Will of Edward H. Hawke, Deceased, and Others, Appellants, Impleaded with Another.
Judges: Present — Matham, P. J., Putnam and Herrick, JJ.
Reporter: Supreme Court Reports (Hun)
Volume: 81
Pages: 370–372

Head Matter:
Edward H. Hawke, Respondent, v. Madison Genn Hawke, Individually and as Executor of the Instrument Admitted to Probate as the Will of Edward H. Hawke, Deceased, and Others, Appellants, Impleaded with Another.
Action to determine the validity of a probated, will — injunction pendente lite, restraining the executors.
"When, on an application for an inj unction pendente lite in an action brought under section 3653a of the Code of Civil Procedure, to determine the validity of the probate of a will, it appears that the realty affords abundant security for the share in the decedent’s estate to which the plaintiff would be entitled if he succeeded in having the will adjudged to be invalid, the executors may be restrained from conveying or incumbering any of the real estate, or from passing any of it over to the beneficiaries named in the will, and be left in entire control of the personal property and of the income of the real estate, subject to their accounting for the same, as executors, in the event of the plaintiff’s failing in the action, and to their accounting to the plaintiff for his share thereof in the event of his succeeding in having the will adjudged to be invalid.
Appeals by tbe defendants Madison Genn Hawke and Julia Alice Isabelle Remier, individually and as executors of tbe will of Edward H. Hawke, deceased, and by tbe defendant Elizabeth M. C. Wilson, from an order of tbe Supreme Court, made at Special Term upon tbe plaintiff’s motion, and entered in tbe office of tbe clerk of Saratoga county on the 4th day of October, 1893, staying and restraining tbe defendant executors, during tbe pendency of tbe •action, from conveying, disposing of, delivering or incumbering any •of tbe property mentioned in the said alleged will.
The action was brought under chapter 591 of the Laws of 1892 (Code Civ. Proc. § 2653a), by the plaintiff, a son of said deceased, to have the validity of the probate of said alleged will determined and the probate thereof in Saratoga county revoked. The plaintiff in his complaint alleges that the instrument is not a valid will, in that said deceased, at the time of the execution thereof, was not of sound mind and memory; that he had an insane delusion in respect to the plaintiff, his son, mistakenly and falsely believing that plaintiff had not for him the filial affection and proper regard of a son; that the instrument was not the free and voluntary act of deceased, but was procured by fraud and undue influence practiced upon deceased by the defendants, beneficiaries in the instrument, who poisoned Iris mind against the plaintiff.
Homing & McCall, for executors, appellants.
Edgar T. Brackett, for Wilson, appellant.
Charles E. Patterson, for defendant Skelding.
J. S. D'Amoreaux, for Maria T. Hawke, appellant.
Foley & Wing, for Edward H. Hawke, respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam :
We have grave doubts of the propriety of granting the injunction herein, and are strongly disposed to reverse the order granting it, but there is a possibility that the plaintiff may lie injured by so doing, and the rights of all parties, it seems to us, can be preserved by a modification of the injunction.
It appears from the record before us that the property involved in this litigation amounts to about $350,000, $100,000 thereof being in personal property, and the remaining $250,000 being in realty.
If the plaintiff succeeds in establishing the invalidity of his father's will, he will be entitled to one-fourth part of that estate ; it will thus be seen that the realty affords abundant security for his protection, if it remains undisposed of and unincumbered.
The injunction, therefore, is modified so as to restrain the defendants herein from conveying, disposing of or incumbering any of the real estate of which the testator died possessed, and from conveying and delivering or passing over any of tlie said real estate to the devisees or legatees named in the last will and testament of said testator; it being intended by this modification of the injunction to give the defendants entire control over the principal and interest of the personal property, and of the rents, incomes and profits of the real estate, subject, of course, to their accounting for the same as the executors of the last will and testament of Edward H. Hawke, deceased, in the event of the plaintiff failing in the action; or of accounting to the plaintiff for his share thereof in tlie event of his succeeding in establishing the invalidity of said will; and, as so modified, the injunction and order appealed from is affirmed, with ten dollars costs, and printing and other disbursements to the appellants.
Present — Matham, P. J., Putnam and Herrick, JJ.
Order for injunction modified, and, as modified, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and printing and other disbursements to the appellants.