Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymond A. THIELE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-03-09
Citations: 88 F. App'x 999
Docket Number: No. 02-30273; D.C. No. CR-02-00007-a-JWS
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Raymond A. THIELE, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before O’SCANNLAIN, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 88
Pages: 999–999

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Raymond A. THIELE, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 02-30273.
D.C. No. CR-02-00007-a-JWS.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted March 2, 2004.
Decided March 9, 2004.
Kevin R. Feldis, Richard A. Friedman, USAK—Office of The U.S. Attorney, Anchorage, AK, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Joseph D. Loescher, Law Office of Joseph R.D. Loescher, Anchorage, AK, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before O’SCANNLAIN, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
At trial, the prosecution adduced evidence sufficient to support a rational jury's conclusion that Thiele was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of conspiracy, robbery, and brandishing a firearm during the commission of a crime of violence. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 318-19, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); United States v. Corral-Gastelum, 240 F.3d 1181, 1183 (9th Cir.2001). The district court did not clearly err in determining that Thiele was a minor—but not a minimal—participant in the conspiracy. United States v. Smith, 282 F.3d 758, 772 (9th Cir.2002); United States v. Murillo, 255 F.3d 1169, 1179 (9th Cir.2001). Finally, the district court did not commit plain error in failing to apportion restitution among Thiele and his co-conspirators. United States v. Bright, 353 F.3d 1114, 1120 (9th Cir.2004); United States v. Booth, 309 F.3d 566, 576 (9th Cir.2002).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.