Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymond Grady STANSEL, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-04-18
Citations: 424 F. App'x 809
Docket Number: No. 10-14078
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymond Grady STANSEL, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before CARNES, HULL and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 424
Pages: 809–809

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymond Grady STANSEL, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-14078
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
April 18, 2011.
Karin B. Hoppmann, Robert E. O’Neill, James C. Preston, David Paul Rhodes, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
David G. Secular, Donna Lee Elm, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before CARNES, HULL and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Donna Lee Elm, appointed counsel for Raymond Grady Stansel, Jr. in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Stansel's conviction and sentence are AF' FIRMED.