Case Name: Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp., Respondent, v. Christopher Gonzalez, Appellant, et al., Defendant. Salvatore B. Pontillo, Intervenor-Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2003-10-06
Citations: 309 A.D.2d 727
Docket Number: 
Parties: Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp., Respondent, v Christopher Gonzalez, Appellant, et al., Defendant. Salvatore B. Pontillo, Intervenor-Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 309
Pages: 727–727

Head Matter:
Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp., Respondent, v Christopher Gonzalez, Appellant, et al., Defendant. Salvatore B. Pontillo, Intervenor-Respondent.
[765 NYS2d 268]

Opinion:
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Christopher Gonzalez appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Davis, J.), dated November 19, 2001, which denied his motion, inter alia, to vacate and set aside a foreclosure sale held on June 18, 2001.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the appellant's contention, no basis exists to vacate and set aside the foreclosure sale either pursuant to CPLR 2003 or on the ground of fraud (see Liberty Sav. Bank, FSB v Knab, 281 AD2d 602 [2001]). Accordingly, the motion was properly denied. Florio, J.P., Krausman, Luciano, Townes and Rivera, JJ., concur.