Case Name: WI-FI ONE, LLC, Appellant v. BROADCOM CORPORATION, Appellee. Michelle K. Lee, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Intervenor
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-03-10
Citations: 680 F. App'x 1001
Docket Number: 2015-1944; 2015-1945; 2015-1946
Parties: WI-FI ONE, LLC, Appellant v. BROADCOM CORPORATION, Appellee Michelle K. Lee, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Intervenor
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 680
Pages: 1001–1003

Head Matter:
WI-FI ONE, LLC, Appellant v. BROADCOM CORPORATION, Appellee Michelle K. Lee, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Intervenor
2015-1944
2015-1945
2015-1946
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
March 10, 2017
Donald Puckett, Nelson Bumgardner PC, Fort Worth, TX, Peter J. Ayers, Attorney, Law Office of Peter J. Ayers, Austin, TX, Douglas Aaron Cawley, McKool Smith, PC, Dallas, TX, for Appellant
Dominic E. Massa, Esq., Kevin Goldman, Janine Marie Lopez, Zachary Picco-lomini, Katie Saxton, Special Counsel, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Boston, MA, for Appellee
Nathan K. Kelley, Solicitor, Kakoli Ca-prihan, Benjamin T. Hickman, Associate Solicitors, Thomas W. Krause, Esq., Deputy Solicitor, Frances Lynch, Scott Weiden-feller, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, Mark R. Freeman, Melissa N. Patterson, Attorneys, Nicolas Riley, Department of Justice, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, Washington, DC, for Intervenor
Jeremy Cooper Doerre, Esq., Pro Se
Eugene M. Gelernter, Irena Royzman, Jason Vitullo, Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP, New York, NY, Walter E. Hanley, Jr., Attorney, Ksenia Takhistova, Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP, New York, NY, Robert M. Isackson, Attorney, Vena-ble LLP, New York, NY, Robert J. Rando, The Rando Law Firm P.C., Syosset, NY, for Amicus Curiae New York Intellectual Property Law Association
Doreen Yatko Trujillo, Counsel, Saul Ewing LLP, Wayne, PA, Richard Alan Neifeld, Ph.D., Attorney, Neifeld IP Law, PC, Alexandria, VA, for Amicus Curiae Federal Circuit Bar Association
Kia Lynn Freeman, Attorney, Erik Paul Belt, Esq., Attorney, McCarter & English, LLP, Boston, MA, for Amicus Curiae Boston Patent Law Association
Saurabh Vishnubhakat, Texas A&M University, School of Law, Fort Worth, TX, for Amici Curiae Ann Bartow, Michael Risch, Gregory Dolin, Esq., Ted M. Sichel-man, Christopher Michael Holman, Jay P. Kesan, Irina D. Manta, Adam Mossoff
Erika Arner, Daniel C. Tucker, Attorneys, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Reston, VA, Joshua Goldberg, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett <& Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC, Mark L. Whitaker, Esq., Trial Attorney, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae American Intellectual Property Law Association
Kenneth J. Weatherwax, Esq., Nathan Nobu Lowenstein, Attorney, Jonathan H. Steinberg, Lowenstein & Weatherwax LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Amicus Curiae Biotechnology Innovation Organization
Sean Daniel Jordan, Attorney, Jackson Walker LLP, Austin, TX, for Amicus Curiae Westerngeco LLC
Jeffrey A. Lamken, Lucas M. Walker, MoloLamken LLP, Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae ELM 3DS Innovations, LLC
Gregory A. Castanias, Jones Day, Wash-iñgton, DC, David B. Cochran, M.D., Jones Day, Cleveland, OH, Mark W. Lauroesch, Intellectual Property Owners Association, Washington, DC, John Marlott, Israel Sasha Mayergoyz, Jones Day, Chicago, IL, Steven W. Miller, Procter & Gamble Company, Cincinnati, OH, Kevin H. Rhodes, 3M Innovative Properties Company, St. Paul, MN, for Amicus Curiae Intellectual Property Owners Association
Stanley Joseph Panikowski, III, DLA Piper LLP (US), San Diego, CA, for Amici Curiae Oracle Corporation, Oracle OTC Subsidiary, LLC
Joseph Guerra, Esq., Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae Apple Inc.
Paul D. Clement, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae Intel Corporation

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
ORDER
The en banc oral argument in this case is scheduled for May 4, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom 201. Each side will have 30 minutes for a total argument time of one hour. The parties shall notify the court by ECF by April 14, 2017 of the names of counsel who will present oral argument.