Case Name: Percy Lee CLAY; Diane Clay, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. P. Trevor SHARP, Individually, and in his capacity as Magistrate, U.S. District Court Middle District, North Carolina, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-02-28
Citations: 512 F. App'x 354
Docket Number: No. 12-2215
Parties: Percy Lee CLAY; Diane Clay, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. P. Trevor SHARP, Individually, and in his capacity as Magistrate, U.S. District Court Middle District, North Carolina, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 512
Pages: 354–354

Head Matter:
Percy Lee CLAY; Diane Clay, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. P. Trevor SHARP, Individually, and in his capacity as Magistrate, U.S. District Court Middle District, North Carolina, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 12-2215.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 26, 2013.
Decided: Feb. 28, 2013.
Percy Lee Clay, Diane Clay, Appellants Pro Se. Kartic Padmanabhan, Office of the United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Percy Lee Clay and Diane Clay appeal the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation and dismissing their civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Clay v. P. Trevor Sharp, 1:10-cv-00891-TDSLPA (M.D.N.C. July 3, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.