Case Name: Nancy E. LEGUM; Anthony E. Kurtz, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. RBC CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC., Successor to J.B. Hanauer & Co; Samuel Kluft Koltun, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-09-26
Citations: 539 F. App'x 290
Docket Number: No. 13-1679
Parties: Nancy E. LEGUM; Anthony E. Kurtz, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. RBC CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC., Successor to J.B. Hanauer & Co; Samuel Kluft Koltun, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 539
Pages: 290–291

Head Matter:
Nancy E. LEGUM; Anthony E. Kurtz, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. RBC CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC., Successor to J.B. Hanauer & Co; Samuel Kluft Koltun, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 13-1679.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 24, 2013.
Decided: Sept. 26, 2013.
Nancy E. Legum, Anthony E. Kurtz, Appellants Pro Se. Daniel Joseph Donovan, Priscilla Alden Donovan, Donovan & Rainie, LLC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Ap-pellees.
Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Nancy E. Legum and Anthony E. Kurtz appeal the district court's orders denying relief in their civil action and denying their motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Legum v. RBC Capital Mkts., LLC, No. 8:12-cv-03773-JFM (D.Md. Mar. 29, 2013; May 13, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.