Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Faruk CURTIS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-08-03
Citations: 390 F. App'x 915
Docket Number: No. 10-10668
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Faruk CURTIS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before EDMONDSON, BLACK and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 390
Pages: 915–915

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Faruk CURTIS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-10668
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Aug. 3, 2010.
Tiffany Hope Eggers, Thomas F. Kir-win, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Pensacola, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Chet Kaufman, Randolph P. Murrell, Federal Public Defender, Tallahassee, FL, Thomas S. Keith, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Pensacola, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Faruk Azim Curtis, White Deer, PA, pro se.
Before EDMONDSON, BLACK and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Curtis in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Curtis's conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.