Case Name: Raymond L. EDWARDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WHITMAN REQUARDT & ASSOCIATES, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-08-21
Citations: 17 F. App'x 122
Docket Number: No. 01-1177
Parties: Raymond L. EDWARDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WHITMAN REQUARDT & ASSOCIATES, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 17
Pages: 122–122

Head Matter:
Raymond L. EDWARDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WHITMAN REQUARDT & ASSOCIATES, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 01-1177.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 31, 2001.
Decided Aug. 21, 2001.
David A. Branch, Law Offices of David A. Branch, P.C., Washington, DC, for appellant.
Charles R. Bacharach, Gordon, Fein-blatt, Rothman, Hoffberger & Hollander, L.L.C., Baltimore, MD, for appellee.
Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Raymond L. Edwards appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment to the Defendant on Edwards' employment discrimination and related state law claims. Our review of the record included on appeal, as well as the parties' briefs, discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Edwards v. Whitman Requardt & Assoc., No. CA-00-1834-S (D.Md. Jan. 24, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.