Case Name: The State of Ohio, Appellee and Cross-Appellant, v. McClendon, Appellant and Cross-Appellee
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2011-03-08
Citations: 128 Ohio St. 3d 354
Docket Number: No. 2010-1950
Parties: The State of Ohio, Appellee and Cross-Appellant, v. McClendon, Appellant and Cross-Appellee.
Judges: O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 128
Pages: 354–355

Head Matter:
The State of Ohio, Appellee and Cross-Appellant, v. McClendon, Appellant and Cross-Appellee.
[Cite as State v. McClendon, 128 Ohio St.3d 354, 2011-Ohio-954.]
(No. 2010-1950
Submitted February 15, 2011
Decided March 8, 2011.)

Opinion:
{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is not accepted.
{¶ 2} The discretionary cross-appeal is accepted.
{¶ 3} The portion of the judgment of the court of appeals addressing appellant's second assignment of error below is vacated on the authority of State v. Johnson, 128 Ohio St.3d 153, 2010-Ohio-6314, 942 N.E.2d 1061, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of our decision in State v. Johnson.
Mathias H. Heck Jr., Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney, and Carley J. Ingram, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee and cross-appellant.
Kyle McClendon, pro se.
O'Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Lanzinger and McGee Brown, JJ., dissent and would not accept the cross-appeal.