Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jesse James DIMAS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-06-04
Citations: 281 F. App'x 294
Docket Number: No. 07-11175
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jesse James DIMAS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 281
Pages: 294–294

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jesse James DIMAS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-11175
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
June 4, 2008.
Denise B. Williams, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Lubbock, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
David E. Sloan, Federal Public Defender’s, Office Northern District of Texas, Lubbock, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jesse James Dimas presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Brown, 920 F.2d 1212, 1216-17 (5th Cir.1991), abrogated on other grounds by United States v. Candia, 454 F.3d 468, 472-73 (5th Cir.2006), which held that a district court may order a term of imprisonment to run consecutively with an unimposed state sentence. The Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.