Case Name: IN RE: Michael Lawrence EISNER, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-11-20
Citations: 702 F. App'x 178
Docket Number: No. 17-1942
Parties: IN RE: Michael Lawrence EISNER, Petitioner.
Judges: Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 702
Pages: 178–179

Head Matter:
IN RE: Michael Lawrence EISNER, Petitioner.
No. 17-1942
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: November 16, 2017
Decided: November 20, 2017
Michael Lawrence Eisner, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael Lawrence Eisner petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and motion for issuance of a subpoena. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court's docket reveals that the district court has denied the motions. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Eisner's case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED