Case Name: Victoriano PEREZ-SANCHEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2013-06-26
Citations: 116 So. 3d 599
Docket Number: No. 3D12-341
Parties: Victoriano PEREZ-SANCHEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before ROTHENBERG, FERNANDEZ, and LOGUE, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 116
Pages: 599–599

Head Matter:
Victoriano PEREZ-SANCHEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D12-341.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
June 26, 2013.
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Robert Kalter, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Robert Martinez Biswas, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before ROTHENBERG, FERNANDEZ, and LOGUE, JJ.

Opinion:
ROTHENBERG, J.
The defendant, Victoriano Perez-Sanchez, appeals the trial court's final order of revocation of probation. We affirm, but remand with directions to enter a corrected order of revocation of probation.
Having reviewed the record and the briefs submitted by both parties, we find that the defendant's arguments concerning the revocation of his probation are without merit. We, therefore, affirm the trial court's order revoking the defendant's probation.
However, we agree with the defendant that the written order of revocation of probation must be corrected to accurately reflect the trial court's oral pronouncements at the revocation hearing. We, therefore, remand with directions to enter a corrected order deleting the finding that the defendant willfully violated the following conditions of probation: (1) failure to report; (3) failure to pay drug fees; and (12) unlawful contact with the victim. Laffitte v. State, 16 So.3d 315, 316 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009).
Affirmed, but remanded with directions.