Case Name: MACY'S, INCORPORATED, Petitioner Cross-Respondent v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent Cross-Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-11-18
Citations: 844 F.3d 188
Docket Number: No. 15-60022
Parties: MACY’S, INCORPORATED, Petitioner Cross-Respondent v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent Cross-Petitioner
Judges: Before BENAVIDES, DENNIS, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 844
Pages: 188–197

Head Matter:
MACY’S, INCORPORATED, Petitioner Cross-Respondent v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent Cross-Petitioner
No. 15-60022
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed November 18, 2016
Shay Dvoretzky, Jones Day, Washington, DC, Willis j. Goldsmith, Jones Day, New York, NY, for Petitioner Cross-Respondent.
Linda Dreeben, Esq., Deputy Associate General Counsel, Julie Brock Broido, Supervisory Attorney, Gregory Paul Lauro, Trial Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Appellate & Supreme Court Litigation Branch, Washington, DC, Jonathan Kreisberg, National Labor Relations Board, Boston, MA, for Respondent Cross-Petitioner.
Alfred Sebastian Gordon O’Connell, Pyle, Rome, Ehrenberg, P.C., Boston, MA, Matthew James Ginsburg, AFL-CIO, Washington, DC, for Intervenor Local 1445, United Food and Commercial Workers International Union.
George Roger King, Esq., HR Policy Association, Washington, DC, Howard Shapiro, Esq., Proskauer, New Orleans, LA, for HR Policy Association, Amicus Curiae.
Todd Clifford Duffield, Ogletree Dea-kins, P.C., Atlanta, GA, Gavin Samuel Martinson, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C., Dallas, TX, for Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, National Federation of Independent Business, National Restaurant Association, and Coalition for a Democratic Workplace, Amici Curiae.
Todd Clifford Duffield, Ogletree Dea-kins, P.C., Atlanta, GA, for International Foodservice Distributors Association, National Association of Manufacturers, National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors, and Society for Human Resource Management, Amici Curiae.
Jason C. Schwartz, Esq., Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, L.L.P., Washington, DC, for Retail Litigation Center and National Retail Federation, Amici Curiae.
Before BENAVIDES, DENNIS, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Treating the petition for rehearing en banc as a petition for panel rehearing, the petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. The court having been polled at the request of one of its members, and a majority of the judges who are in regular active service and not disqualified not having voted in favor (Fed. R. App. P. 35 and 5th Cir. R. 35), the petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.
In the en banc poll, 6 judges voted in favor of rehearing (Judges Jolly, Jones, Smith, Clement, Owen, and Elrod), and 9 judges voted against rehearing (Chief Judge Stewart and Judges Davis, Dennis, Prado, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Hig-ginson, and Costa).