Case Name: Nina H. Dearing, Resp't, v. Alma Y. Pearson, App'lt
Court: New York City Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1893-11-27
Citations: 55 N.Y. St. Rep. 774
Docket Number: 
Parties: Nina H. Dearing, Resp’t, v. Alma Y. Pearson, App’lt.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 55
Pages: 774–774

Head Matter:
Nina H. Dearing, Resp’t, v. Alma Y. Pearson, App’lt.
(City Court of New York, General Term,
Filed November 27, 1893.)
Appeal—Case—Settlement.
The action of the trial justice in settling a case on appeal, upon conflicting affidavits as to the facts cannot he reviewed.
Appeal from order denying motion for a resettlement of a proposed amendment to a case on appeal.
Smith, Bowman & Close, for app’lt; David Leventritt, for resp’t.

Opinion:
Newburger, J.
This is an appeal from an order made by the trial justice herein, denying the defendant's motion for a resettlement of a proposed amendment to the case of appeal from the judgment.
This court held in Greene v. Shute, 26 St. Rep., 114, that the action of the trial justice in settling á case on appeal cannot be reviewed where there is a dispute as to the facts.
In this case it appears that there were a number of conflicting affidavits as to the facts and the trial justice determined it.
The order must, therefore, be affirmed, with costs.
Van Wyck and McCarthy, JJ., concur.