Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Frank BURGESS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-06-07
Citations: 471 F. App'x 860
Docket Number: No. 11-15828
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Frank BURGESS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 471
Pages: 860–861

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Frank BURGESS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-15828
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
June 7, 2012.
Peggy Morris Ronca, Nicole M. Andrejko, I. Randall Gold, Roger Bernard Hand- berg, III, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Orlando, FL, Robert E. O’Neill, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Sean M. Wagner, The Law Offices of Sean M. Wagner, PA, Melbourne, FL, Michael Frank Burgess, John E. Polk CF, Sanford, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before HULL, MARTIN and HILL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Sean M. Wagner, counsel for Michael Frank Burgess in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Burgess's convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. Accordingly, Burgess's motion for leave to file a pro se supplemental brief is DENIED.