Case Name: KATE ARNETT, EXECUTRIX, &c., APPELLANT, v. NEWTON A. K. BUGBEE, STATE COMPTROLLER, RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1923-12-04
Citations: 99 N.J.L. 269
Docket Number: 
Parties: KATE ARNETT, EXECUTRIX, &c., APPELLANT, v. NEWTON A. K. BUGBEE, STATE COMPTROLLER, RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 99
Pages: 269–269

Head Matter:
KATE ARNETT, EXECUTRIX, &c., APPELLANT, v. NEWTON A. K. BUGBEE, STATE COMPTROLLER, RESPONDENT.
Argued June 27, 1923
Decided December 4, 1923.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 98 N. J. L. 416.
For the appellant, Walter F. Hayhurst.
For the respondent, Thomas F. McCran.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Black in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — 'The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenc hard, Parker, Minturn, Heppenheimer, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskiric, JJ. 9.
For reversal — None.