Case Name: Harry S. Katzin, Herman Z. Baum, Moritz L. Cohen and Samuel Katzin, complainants-respondents, v. Kruvant-Mayzel Company, a corporation of New Jersey, and Harry Kruvant, defendants-appellants
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1933-01-31
Citations: 112 N.J. Eq. 290
Docket Number: 
Parties: Harry S. Katzin, Herman Z. Baum, Moritz L. Cohen and Samuel Katzin, complainants-respondents, v. Kruvant-Mayzel Company, a corporation of New Jersey, and Harry Kruvant, defendants-appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 112
Pages: 290–291

Head Matter:
Harry S. Katzin, Herman Z. Baum, Moritz L. Cohen and Samuel Katzin, complainants-respondents, v. Kruvant-Mayzel Company, a corporation of New Jersey, and Harry Kruvant, defendants-appellants.
[Submitted October term, 1932.
Decided January 31st, 1933.]
Messrs. Xanter & Xanter (Mr. Elias A. Xanter, of counsel), for the appellants.
Mr. Theodore Silver (Mr. Thomas B. Healey, of counsel), for the respondents.

Opinion:
Pee Cueiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Berry. We have considered the allowance of counsel fee made by the vice-chancellor, and find nothing in the record to indicate that it was excessive. We therefore conclude it should not be disturbed.
' For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Teenchaed, Pabkee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Beogan, Hehee, Kays, Heteield, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.