Case Name: Sylvia JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2007-04-25
Citations: 953 So. 2d 780
Docket Number: No. 4D06-2216
Parties: Sylvia JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: STONE, FARMER and MAY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 953
Pages: 780–780

Head Matter:
Sylvia JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D06-2216.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
April 25, 2007.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and John M. Conway, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and James J. Carney, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
ON MOTION FOR WRITTEN OPINION
PER CURIAM.
The defendant appeals an order revoking her probation. She argues the trial court erred in admitting a lab report concerning the results of her urinalysis exam in derogation of Crawford v. Washington. We disagree and affirm.
This court recently joined the First and Fifth District Courts of Appeal in holding that Crawford does not apply in community control and probation revocation proceedings. Jackson v. State, 931 So.2d 1062, 1063 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (certifying the issue to the Supreme Court of Florida). As we did in Jackson, we certify the question to the Supreme Court of Florida:
DOES THE "TESTIMONIAL HEARSAY" RULE SET FORTH IN CRAWFORD V. WASHINGTON, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004), APPLY IN COMMUNITY CONTROL AND PROBATION REVOCATION PROCEEDINGS?
Affirmed.
STONE, FARMER and MAY, JJ., concur.
. 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004).