Case Name: ROBERT STURLA ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1927-01-31
Citations: 103 N.J.L. 507
Docket Number: 
Parties: ROBERT STURLA ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 103
Pages: 507–508

Head Matter:
ROBERT STURLA ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLANT.
Submitted October 29, 1926
Decided January 31, 1927.
For the respondents, Stokes & McDermott.
For the appellant, William A. Barkalow.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.