Case Name: J. W. FREEMAN, Respondent, v. ROBERT A. BROWN, Appellant
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1906-07-12
Citations: 4 Cal. App. 108
Docket Number: Civ. No. 291
Parties: J. W. FREEMAN, Respondent, v. ROBERT A. BROWN, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports
Volume: 4
Pages: 108–109

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 291.
Second Appellate District.
July 12, 1906.]
J. W. FREEMAN, Respondent, v. ROBERT A. BROWN, Appellant.
New Trial—Statement—Excusable Omission of Specification—Refusal of Leave to Amend—Appealable Order.—An order denying a motion under section 473 of the Code of Civil Procedure for leave to amend a statement on motion for new trial by inserting specifications excusably omitted therefrom is appealable, and a motion to dismiss the appeal therefrom must be denied.
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County denying a motion for leave to amend a statement on motion for a new trial. Walter Bordwell, Judge.
Motion to dismiss appeal.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
George L. Keefer, and Walter L. Bowers, for Appellant.
H. M. Barstow, and Barstow & Variel, for Respondent.

Opinion:
The COURT.
This is an appeal from an order denying the defendant's motion to amend his statement on motion for a new trial by inserting specifications therein. The plaintiff moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the order is not appealable.
Appellant by his motion and application sought relief under section 473, Code of Civil Procedure. The order denying such relief is appealable. (Murphy v. Stelling, 138 Cal. 642, [72 Pac. 176]; Kaltschmidt v. Weber, 136 Cal. 675, [69 Pac. 497].)
Motion to dismiss is denied.