Case Name: Joseph H. Sulzbacker v. J. Cawthra & Co., Lim
Court: New York City Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1895-12-02
Citations: 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 895
Docket Number: 
Parties: Joseph H. Sulzbacker v. J. Cawthra & Co., Lim.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 70
Pages: 895–895

Head Matter:
Joseph H. Sulzbacker v. J. Cawthra & Co., Lim.
N. Y. C. C.,
December 2, 1895.

Opinion:
Peb Cubiam.
Defendant's motion to reduce the amount for which the attachment was granted is not inconsistent with its appeal from the order denying the motion to vacate the attachment. Both motions were availed of by the defendant as of right. Hence this motion for dismissal of the appeal should be denied, with §10 costs.