Case Name: Herbert L. Brickman, Appellant-Respondent, v. F. W. Woolworth Company, Respondent-Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1982-11-16
Citations: 58 N.Y.2d 639
Docket Number: 
Parties: Herbert L. Brickman, Appellant-Respondent, v F. W. Woolworth Company, Respondent-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 58
Pages: 639–642

Head Matter:
Herbert L. Brickman, Appellant-Respondent, v F. W. Woolworth Company, Respondent-Appellant.
Argued October 4, 1982;
decided November 16, 1982
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Raymond, T. Munsell, Paul Windells, Jr., and Kenneth W. Greenawalt for appellant.
Jon Paul Robbins and Herbert L. Brickman, pro se, for Herbert L. Brickman, respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On defendant's appeal: Order reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed for reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum by Presiding Justice Francis T. Murphy, Jr., at the Appellate Division on the earlier appeal (66 AD2d 737-740).
On plaintiff's appeal: Appeal dismissed, without costs, as academic in view of the disposition made on defendant's appeal.
Concur: Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer. Taking no part: Chief Judge Cooke.