Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Bradley SMITH, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-10-04
Citations: 669 F. App'x 232
Docket Number: No. 15-30665 Summary Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Bradley SMITH, Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 669
Pages: 232–233

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Bradley SMITH, Defendant-Appellant
No. 15-30665 Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Date Filed: 10/04/2016
Camille Ann Domingue, Assistant U.S. Attorney, John Luke Walker, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Bradley Smith, Pro Se
Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Bradley Smith has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Smith has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Smith's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
We have reviewed counsel s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Smith's response. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should.not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.