Case Name: William CONDER and Deloris Conder, Appellants, v. Richard C. RITCHEY and Mary Louise Ritchey, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-08-22
Citations: 548 So. 2d 737
Docket Number: No. 88-2789
Parties: William CONDER and Deloris Conder, Appellants, v. Richard C. RITCHEY and Mary Louise Ritchey, Appellees.
Judges: Before HUBBART, FERGUSON and GERSTEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 548
Pages: 737–737

Head Matter:
William CONDER and Deloris Conder, Appellants, v. Richard C. RITCHEY and Mary Louise Ritchey, Appellees.
No. 88-2789.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Aug. 22, 1989.
Rehearing Denied Sept. 27, 1989.
Greenfield & DuVal, and Harvie S. Du-Val, North Miami, for appellants.
Atlas, Pearlman & Trop, and Robin Cor-win Campbell, Ft. Lauderdale, for appel-lees.
Before HUBBART, FERGUSON and GERSTEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Mobil Oil Corp. v. Shevin, 354 So.2d 372 (Fla.1977); Union Oil of Cal., Amsco Div. v. Watson, 468 So.2d 349 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 479 So.2d 119 (1985); Neil v. South Fla. Auto Painters, Inc., 397 So.2d 1160 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Procacci v. Zacco, 402 So.2d 425 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).