Case Name: Arthur D. Skalak and Bernice M. Skalak, appellees, v. James J. Walker and Ruth Ann Walker, appellants
Court: Nebraska Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Nebraska
Decision Date: 1990-06-08
Citations: 235 Neb. 551
Docket Number: No.88-159
Parties: Arthur D. Skalak and Bernice M. Skalak, appellees, v. James J. Walker and Ruth Ann Walker, appellants.
Judges: Hastings, C.J., Boslaugh, White, Caporale, Shanahan, Grant, andFAHRNBRUCH, JJ.
Reporter: Nebraska Reports
Volume: 235
Pages: 551–551

Head Matter:
Arthur D. Skalak and Bernice M. Skalak, appellees, v. James J. Walker and Ruth Ann Walker, appellants.
456 N.W.2d 109
Filed June 8, 1990.
No.88-159.
Robert V. Dwyer, Jr., and Richard D. Cimino, of Dwyer, Pohren, Wood, Heavey & Grimm, for appellants.
Richard E Norris for appellees.
Hastings, C.J., Boslaugh, White, Caporale, Shanahan, Grant, andFAHRNBRUCH, JJ.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Upon consideration of the record, briefs, and recommendation of the Appellate Division of the District Court, we find that the evidence supports a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs for misrepresentation, but that because of a failure of proof and error of law, the judgment of the district court is reversed with directions to reverse and remand the cause to the county court for a new trial on the issue of damages.
Reversed and remanded for a new trial on the issue of damages .