Case Name: Maria Sonia Mondragon HERRERA, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-09-25
Citations: 202 F. App'x 266
Docket Number: No. 05-77385
Parties: Maria Sonia Mondragon HERRERA, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: O’SCANNLAIN, GRABER and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 202
Pages: 266–267

Head Matter:
Maria Sonia Mondragon HERRERA, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 05-77385.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 18, 2006.
Filed Sept. 25, 2006.
Maria Sonia Mondragon Herrera, Santa Maria, CA, pro se.
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, GRABER and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Respondent's motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard); see also 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(iii) (providing for an exception to the time and numerical limitations on motions to reopen only upon evidence of changed circumstances that could not have been presented at a previous hearing). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.