Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher Fred GOAD, Sr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-08-30
Citations: 656 F. App'x 13
Docket Number: No. 16-6436
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher Fred GOAD, Sr., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 656
Pages: 13–14

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher Fred GOAD, Sr., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-6436
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: August 25, 2016
Decided: August 30, 2016
Christopher Fred Goad, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Michael Ronald Gill, Assistant United States Attorney, Erik Sean Sie-bert, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Fred Goad, Sr., appeals the district court's order denying relief on his motion for reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Goad, No. 3:08-cr-00184-REP-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 22, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED