Case Name: CATALANO, INC., et al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TARGET SALES, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1980-08-11
Citations: 625 F.2d 331
Docket Number: Nos. 77-2221, 77-2222
Parties: CATALANO, INC., et al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TARGET SALES, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 625
Pages: 331–331

Head Matter:
CATALANO, INC., et al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TARGET SALES, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Nos. 77-2221, 77-2222.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 27, 1980.
Decided Aug. 11, 1980.
Jack B. Owens, Orrick, Herrington, Row-ley & Sutcliffe, San Francisco, Cal., argued, for plaintiffs-appellants; Richard J. Lucas, San Francisco, Cal., James P. Samarco, Fresno, Cal., on brief.
G. Richard Doty, McCutchen, Black, Ver-leger & Shea, Los Angeles, Cal., argued, for defendants-appellees; J. Wallace Upton, Fresno, Cal., Pamela A. Rymer, Los Ange-les, Cal., Ted R. Frame, Coalinga, Cal., on brief.
Before WALLACE and SNEED, Circuit Judges, and BLUMENFELD , District Judge.
Honorable M. Joseph Blumenfeld, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Connecticut, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
We remand this case to the district court for further proceedings in accordance with Catalano, Inc. v. Target Sales, Inc., et al., -U.S. -, 100 S.Ct. 1925, 64 L.Ed.2d 580 (1980).