Case Name: Elisha GILBERT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-03-13
Citations: 558 So. 2d 149
Docket Number: No. 89-1831
Parties: Elisha GILBERT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 558
Pages: 149–149

Head Matter:
Elisha GILBERT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 89-1831.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 13, 1990.
Elisha Gilbert, in pro. per.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Ivy R. Ginsberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The errors asserted in defendant's second petition for post-conviction relief were either presented or could have been presented in defendant's first petition. Thus, his second petition is procedurally barred. Tafero v. State, 524 So.2d 987 (Fla.1987); Booker v. State, 503 So.2d 888 (Fla.1987); Witt v. State, 465 So.2d 510 (Fla.1985); Williams v. State, 557 So.2d 182 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).
Affirmed.