Case Name: In the Matter of Charles L. WOODY, Jr., Harold Russell Ryder and Lucien A. Hold, Individually and as Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Woody & Co., Alleged Bankrupts, Charles L. Woody, Jr., Objector-Appellant, Carl E. Ward, Claimant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1932-05-02
Citations: 57 F.2d 1087
Docket Number: No. 368
Parties: In the Matter of Charles L. WOODY, Jr., Harold Russell Ryder and Lucien A. Hold, Individually and as Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Woody & Co., Alleged Bankrupts, Charles L. Woody, Jr., Objector-Appellant, Carl E. Ward, Claimant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 57
Pages: 1087–1087

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Charles L. WOODY, Jr., Harold Russell Ryder and Lucien A. Hold, Individually and as Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Woody & Co., Alleged Bankrupts, Charles L. Woody, Jr., Objector-Appellant, Carl E. Ward, Claimant-Appellee.
No. 368.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
May 2, 1932.
White & Case, of New York City (Graham D. Mattison and William St. John To-zer, both of New York City, of counsel), for objector-appellant, Charles L. Woody, Jr.
Graves & Yawger, of New York City (Charles S. Yawger, of New York City, of counsel), for claimant-appellee, Carl B. Ward.
Garey & Garey, of New York City (Eugene L. Garey, Earl J. Garey, and Edward K. Kennedy, all of New York City, of counsel), amici curias.
Before MANTON, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM!.
Order [57 F.(2d) 207] affirmed.