Case Name: Evrick BROWN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2018-04-10
Citations: 544 S.W.3d 687
Docket Number: No. ED 105545
Parties: Evrick BROWN, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Colleen Dolan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 544
Pages: 687–688

Head Matter:
Evrick BROWN, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 105545
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
FILED: April 10, 2018
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: Gwenda Renee Robinson, Missouri Public Defender Office, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.
ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Richard Anthony Starnes, Assistant Attorney General, Supreme Court Building, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.
Before Colleen Dolan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Evrick Brown ("Movant") appeals from the motion court's "Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order" denying Movant's "Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence," which alleged ineffective assistance of counsel, following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
"An order sustaining or overruling a motion filed under . Rule 29.15 shall be deemed a final judgment for purposes of appeal by the movant or the state." Rule 29.15(k).