Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Patrick Proctor, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1992-04-30
Citations: 79 N.Y.2d 992
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Patrick Proctor, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 79
Pages: 992–994

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Patrick Proctor, Appellant.
Decided April 30, 1992
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Alfred O’Connor and Matthew Muraskin for appellant.
Denis Dillon, District Attorney (Alexis Kriedman of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed. Not having raised the issue by motion to vácate or otherwise in the court of first instance, defendant's argument that there was a failure to comply with the procedures of CPL 400.20 has not been preserved for our review (People v Oliver, 63 NY2d 973; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636). Defendant's remaining claim is meritless.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.