Case Name: Louis Elie Joseph Henry de Galard de Brassac de Bearn, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Francois de Bearn et al.; Louis Elie Joseph Henry de Galard de Brassac de Bearn, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Francois de Bearn; Louis Elie Joseph Henry de Galard de Brassac de Bearn, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Odon de Bearn; Louis Elie Joseph Henry de Galard de Brassac de Bearn, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Pierre de Bearn; Louis Elie Joseph Henry de Galard de Brassac de Bearn, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Jean Baptiste Chaumet
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1912-04-08
Citations: 225 U.S. 695
Docket Number: No. 797; No. 798; No. 799; No. 800; and No. 801
Parties: Louis Elie Joseph Henry de Galard de Brassac de Bearn, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Francois de Bearn et al.; Louis Elie Joseph Henry de Galard de Brassac de Bearn, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Francois de Bearn; Louis Elie Joseph Henry de Galard de Brassac de Bearn, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Odon de Bearn; Louis Elie Joseph Henry de Galard de Brassac de Bearn, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Pierre de Bearn; Louis Elie Joseph Henry de Galard de Brassac de Bearn, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Jean Baptiste Chaumet.
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 225
Pages: 695–695

Head Matter:
No. 797.
No. 798.
No. 799.
No. 800.
and No. 801.
Louis Elie Joseph Henry de Galard de Brassac de Bearn, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Francois de Bearn et al.; Louis Elie Joseph Henry de Galard de Brassac de Bearn, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Francois de Bearn; Louis Elie Joseph Henry de Galard de Brassac de Bearn, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Odon de Bearn; Louis Elie Joseph Henry de Galard de Brassac de Bearn, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Pierre de Bearn; Louis Elie Joseph Henry de Galard de Brassac de Bearn, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Jean Baptiste Chaumet.
In error to the Court of Appeals of the State of Maryland.
Motion to dismiss submitted April 2, 1912.
Decided April 8, 1912.
Mr. Maurice Leon for the pláintiff in error. Mr. J. Kemp Bartlett arid Mr. Edgar Allan Poe for the defendants in error.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. (Toland v. Sprague, 12 Pet. 300, 331; Boyle v. Zacharie, 6 Pet. 648; Loeber v. Schroeder, 149 U. S. 580; The Missouri & Kansas Interurban Ry. Co. v. The City of Olathe, Kansas, 222 U. S. 185, 187, 191.)