Case Name: Sally E. CLAYBROOKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jim NEWSOME, Safety Inspector; Mary Clarke, Doctor VCCW; Bobbi Henderson, Nurse, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-09-18
Citations: 18 F. App'x 243
Docket Number: No. 00-7079
Parties: Sally E. CLAYBROOKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jim NEWSOME, Safety Inspector; Mary Clarke, Doctor VCCW; Bobbi Henderson, Nurse, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 18
Pages: 243–244

Head Matter:
Sally E. CLAYBROOKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jim NEWSOME, Safety Inspector; Mary Clarke, Doctor VCCW; Bobbi Henderson, Nurse, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 00-7079.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 10, 2001.
Decided Sept. 18, 2001.
Sally E. Claybrooks, pro se.
Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Sally E. Claybrooks appeals the district court's order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Claybrooks v. Newsome, No. CA-00-1097-AM (E.D.Va. July 21, 2000); see Booth v. Churner, 531 U.S. 956, 121 S.Ct. 1819, 149 L.Ed.2d 958 (2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.