Case Name: In the Matter of Dianne Hodes, Petitioner, v. Nathaniel T. Helman, a Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Judicial Department, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1963-06-13
Citations: 19 A.D.2d 603
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Dianne Hodes, Petitioner, v. Nathaniel T. Helman, a Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Judicial Department, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 19
Pages: 603–604

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Dianne Hodes, Petitioner, v. Nathaniel T. Helman, a Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Judicial Department, Respondent.

Opinion:
Petition under article 78 in the nature of a writ of prohibition unanimously dismissed, without costs. Prohibition does not lie to prevent the taking of testimony where the court has jurisdiction of the subject matter and alleged errors in the reception of testimony may be remedied by way of appeal, and where no extreme necessity is shown (Matter of City of New York v. Maltbie, 248 App. Div. 36, affid. 274 N. Y. 464). Concur — Breitel, J. P., McNally, Eager, Steuer and Bastow.