Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Victor Daniel CAMEY-CID, Also Known as Victor Daniel Camey, Also Known as Victor Camey, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-12-19
Citations: 550 F. App'x 180
Docket Number: No. 13-20160
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Victor Daniel CAMEY-CID, Also Known as Victor Daniel Camey, Also Known as Victor Camey, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before JOLLY, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 550
Pages: 180–181

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Victor Daniel CAMEY-CID, Also Known as Victor Daniel Camey, Also Known as Victor Camey, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-20160
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 19, 2013.
Renata Ann Gowie, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Neal Davis, III, Esq., Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before JOLLY, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Victor Daniel Camey-Cid has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Camey-Cid has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.