Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. William H. BECKERMAN, Jr., Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-11-07
Citations: 39 S.W.3d 45
Docket Number: No. ED 76769
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. William H. BECKERMAN, Jr., Appellant.
Judges: BEFORE: GARY M. GAERTNER, Sr., P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 39
Pages: 45–45

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. William H. BECKERMAN, Jr., Appellant.
No. ED 76769.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Nov. 7, 2000.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 12, 2001.
Lance R. Drury, St. Genevieve, Missouri, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Catherine Chatman, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
BEFORE: GARY M. GAERTNER, Sr., P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
William H. Beckerman, Jr. (hereinafter, "Defendant") appeals from his conviction for driving while intoxicated. Defendant contends the trial court erred in permitting disclosure of a questionnaire to the State and that there was juror misconduct. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no eiTor of law. An extended opinion reciting detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).