Case Name: Edward E. POOLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CARTERET COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; Acea Buck, Sheriff; Detective Cooper; J. Johnson, Deputy; Detective Phifer; J. Pittman, Detective; J. Willis, Detective; Travis Sanderson, Defendants-Appellees; Edward E. Poole, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carteret County Sheriffs Department; Acea Buck, Sheriff; Detective Cooper; J. Johnson, Deputy; Detective Phifer; J. Pittman, Detective; J. Willis, Detective; Travis Sanderson, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-12-15
Citations: 458 F. App'x 232
Docket Number: Nos. 11-6744, 11-7314
Parties: Edward E. POOLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CARTERET COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; Acea Buck, Sheriff; Detective Cooper; J. Johnson, Deputy; Detective Phifer; J. Pittman, Detective; J. Willis, Detective; Travis Sanderson, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before DUNCAN, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 458
Pages: 232–233

Head Matter:
Edward E. POOLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CARTERET COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; Acea Buck, Sheriff; Detective Cooper; J. Johnson, Deputy; Detective Phifer; J. Pittman, Detective; J. Willis, Detective; Travis Sanderson, Defendants-Appellees.
Edward E. Poole, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carteret County Sheriffs Department; Acea Buck, Sheriff; Detective Cooper; J. Johnson, Deputy; Detective Phifer; J. Pittman, Detective; J. Willis, Detective; Travis Sanderson, Defendants-Appellees.
Nos. 11-6744, 11-7314.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 28, 2011.
Decided: Dec. 15, 2011.
Edward E. Poole, Appellant Pro Se.
Before DUNCAN, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Edward E. Poole appeals the district court's orders dismissing his civil rights complaint as frivolous and denying his motion filed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Poole failed to state a claim that the Defendants violated his constitutional rights. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Poole v. Carteret Cnty. Sheriffs Dep't, No. 5:10-ct-03215-BO (E.D.N.C. May 10, 2011; July 15, 2011). We also deny Poole's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.