Case Name: Saffle, Warden, et al. v. Parks; Boyde v. California; Tassin v. Louisiana; Walker v. Suburban Hospital Assn. et al.; Hamilton v. California; McClain v. Mitchell et al.; In re Warren; Gaunce v. Burgener et al.; In re Martin; and Kim v. United States
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1990-04-30
Citations: 495 U.S. 924
Docket Number: No. 88-1264; No. 88-6613; No. 88-7222; No. 89-1226; No. 89-5998; No. 89-6395; No. 89-6455; No. 89-6553; No. 89-6594; No. 89-6639
Parties: Saffle, Warden, et al. v. Parks, Boyde v. California, Tassin v. Louisiana, Walker v. Suburban Hospital Assn. et al., Hamilton v. California, McClain v. Mitchell et al., In re Warren, Gaunce v. Burgener et al., In re Martin, Kim v. United States, 494 U. S. 1037.
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 495
Pages: 924–924

Head Matter:
No. 88-1264.
No. 88-6613.
No. 88-7222.
No. 89-1226.
No. 89-5998.
No. 89-6395.
No. 89-6455.
No. 89-6553.
No. 89-6594.
No. 89-6639.
Saffle, Warden, et al. v. Parks, Boyde v. California, Tassin v. Louisiana, Walker v. Suburban Hospital Assn. et al., Hamilton v. California, McClain v. Mitchell et al., In re Warren, Gaunce v. Burgener et al., In re Martin, Kim v. United States, 494 U. S. 1037.

Opinion:
494 U. S. 484;
494 U. S. 370;
493 U. S. 874;
494 U. S. 1056;
494 U. S. 1039;
494 U. S. 1006;
494 U. S. 1025;
494 U. S. 1035;
494 U. S. 1025; and
Petitions for rehearing denied.