Case Name: H. W. FINDLEY, Defendant-Appellant, v. The F. D. CUMMER & SON COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1940-01-03
Citations: 109 F.2d 1015
Docket Number: No. 7208
Parties: H. W. FINDLEY, Defendant-Appellant, v. The F. D. CUMMER & SON COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 109
Pages: 1015–1015

Head Matter:
H. W. FINDLEY, Defendant-Appellant, v. The F. D. CUMMER & SON COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee.
No. 7208.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Jan. 3, 1940.
Clarence B. Nixon, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellant.
Elder W. Marshall, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellee.
Before BIGGS, MARIS, and JONES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
For the reasons set forth in the memorandum opinion of the district court, 30 F.Supp. 884, denying the defendant's motion for a new trial and upon the authority of Second National Bank of Reading v. Yeager, 268 Pa. 167, 111 A. 159; Speier v. Michelson, 303 Pa. 66, 154 A. 127, and Philadelphia Record Co. v. Sweet, 124 Pa.Super. 414, 188 A. 631, the judgment appealed from is affirmed..