Case Name: MARTHA B. TRAVERS, APPELLANT, v. W. ALBERT BURDGE AND WILLIAM L. RUSSELL, PARTNERS, TRADING AS BURDGE & RUSSELL, RESPONDENTS
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1925-01-19
Citations: 101 N.J.L. 237
Docket Number: 
Parties: MARTHA B. TRAVERS, APPELLANT, v. W. ALBERT BURDGE AND WILLIAM L. RUSSELL, PARTNERS, TRADING AS BURDGE & RUSSELL, RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 101
Pages: 237–239

Head Matter:
MARTHA B. TRAVERS, APPELLANT, v. W. ALBERT BURDGE AND WILLIAM L. RUSSELL, PARTNERS, TRADING AS BURDGE & RUSSELL, RESPONDENTS.
Submitted November 7, 1924
Decided January 19, 1925.
Eor the appellant, Reilly, Quinn & Parsons.
Eor the respondents, Howard 8. Higginson.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons given by Lawrence, Common Pleas judge, sitting in the Circuit Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.