Case Name: Ernest FLEMMING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1982-06-22
Citations: 415 So. 2d 824
Docket Number: No. 81-857
Parties: Ernest FLEMMING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 415
Pages: 824–824

Head Matter:
Ernest FLEMMING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 81-857.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
June 22, 1982.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Eugene F. Zenobi, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Paul Mendel-son, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
While there is no merit in the appellant's attacks upon his convictions, which claim error in the failure to suppress his confession, see Busch v. State, 392 So.2d 272 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 909, 101 S.Ct. 3040, 69 L.Ed.2d 412 (1981); State v. Thomas, 405 So.2d 462 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Collier v. State, 353 So.2d 1219 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); compare Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573, 100 S.Ct. 1371, 63 L.Ed.2d 639 (1980), we do agree — as the state concedes — that his sentence for attempted burglary of an occupied dwelling must, after remand, be reduced from fifteen to five years imprisonment. Sec. 777.-04(4)(c), 775.082(3)(d), Fla.Stat. (1979); Fenn v. State, 398 So.2d 1004 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). With that exception, the judgments and sentences under review are affirmed.
Affirmed as modified.