Case Name: Dime Savings Bank of Brooklyn, Respondent, v. Charles J. Beecher et al., Defendants, and United States of America, Appellant; Jamaica Savings Bank, Respondent-Appellant, v. Herman Williams et al., Defendants, and United States of America, Appellant-Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1966-03-31
Citations: 17 N.Y.2d 725
Docket Number: 
Parties: Dime Savings Bank of Brooklyn, Respondent, v. Charles J. Beecher et al., Defendants, and United States of America, Appellant. Jamaica Savings Bank, Respondent-Appellant, v. Herman Williams et al., Defendants, and United States of America, Appellant-Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 17
Pages: 725–728

Head Matter:
Dime Savings Bank of Brooklyn, Respondent, v. Charles J. Beecher et al., Defendants, and United States of America, Appellant. Jamaica Savings Bank, Respondent-Appellant, v. Herman Williams et al., Defendants, and United States of America, Appellant-Respondent.
Argued February 21, 1966;
decided March 31, 1966.
Joseph P. Hoey, United States Attorney (Joseph Rosenzweig of counsel), for United States of America, appellant and appellant-respondent.
James J. Milligan, William A. Anzalone and George H. Sintenis for Dime Savings Bank of Brooklyn, respondent.
Stanley Beals and John L. A. Bond for Jamaica Savings Bank, respondent-appellant.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Charles A. La Torella, Jr., and Samuel A. Hirshowitz of counsel), amicus curiæ.
Morris H. Schneider, County Attorney (Seymour S. Ross and Jerome F. Matedero of counsel), for County of Nassau, amicus curiæ.
Martin A. Meyer, Jr., for Savings Banks Association of New York State, amicus curiæ.

Opinion:
In the first above-entitled action: Appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action as to appellant within the meaning of the Constitution.
In the second above-entitled action: Appeals dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action as to appellants within the meaning of the Constitution.