Case Name: Curtis L. MCCOY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROBINSON, Captain, Head Nurse, Richmond City Jail; C.T. Woody, Sheriff, Richmond City Jail, sued in his individual and official capacity; Davis, Deputy, Richmond City Jail, sued in his individual and official capacity, Defendants-Appellees, and Richmond City Jail Medical Department; Gaines, Nurse, Richmond City Jail, sued in her individual and official capacity, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-01-21
Citations: 408 F. App'x 671
Docket Number: No. 10-7529
Parties: Curtis L. MCCOY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROBINSON, Captain, Head Nurse, Richmond City Jail; C.T. Woody, Sheriff, Richmond City Jail, sued in his individual and official capacity; Davis, Deputy, Richmond City Jail, sued in his individual and official capacity, Defendants-Appellees, and Richmond City Jail Medical Department; Gaines, Nurse, Richmond City Jail, sued in her individual and official capacity, Defendants.
Judges: Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 408
Pages: 671–672

Head Matter:
Curtis L. MCCOY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROBINSON, Captain, Head Nurse, Richmond City Jail; C.T. Woody, Sheriff, Richmond City Jail, sued in his individual and official capacity; Davis, Deputy, Richmond City Jail, sued in his individual and official capacity, Defendants-Appellees, and Richmond City Jail Medical Department; Gaines, Nurse, Richmond City Jail, sued in her individual and official capacity, Defendants.
No. 10-7529.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 13, 2011.
Decided: Jan. 21, 2011.
Curtis L. McCoy, Appellant Pro Se. Leslie A. Winneberger, Beale, Balfour, Davidson & Etherington, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Curtis L. McCoy seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing some defendants and claims in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order McCoy seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.