Case Name: The State, ex rel. McClintock, Pros. Atty., v. Diehl, Judge
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1926-12-16
Citations: 115 Ohio St. 454
Docket Number: No. 20191
Parties: The State, ex rel. McClintock, Pros. Atty., v. Diehl, Judge.
Judges: Marshall, C. J., Day, Allen and Kinkade, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, New Service
Volume: 115
Pages: 454–457

Head Matter:
The State, ex rel. McClintock, Pros. Atty., v. Diehl, Judge.
(No. 20191
Decided December 16, 1926.)
Mr. G. B. McClintock, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. II. G. Pontms, for plaintiff.
Mr. Prank N. Sweitser, for defendant.

Opinion:
By the Court.
This is an original action in this court, praying a writ of prohibition against the common pleas court of Stark county, to prevent that court from admitting one Rudner to bail, said Rudner being indicted on a charge of first degree murder. The clerk of the court is also made a party defendant. Both the judge and the clerk have demurred to the petition, and the petition and demurrer challenge the jurisdiction of the trial court, before trial, to hear and determine the right of a person under indictment to be admitted to bail. Upon the authority of Kendle v. Tarbell, 24 Ohio St., 196, the demurrer must be overruled, and the jurisdiction of the court must be denied.
Demurrer overruled.
Marshall, C. J., Day, Allen and Kinkade, JJ., concur.
Robinson, J., not participating.