Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Russell G. ROGERS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-01-26
Citations: 462 F. App'x 378
Docket Number: No. 09-6404
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Russell G. ROGERS, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 462
Pages: 378–378

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Russell G. ROGERS, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 09-6404.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 10, 2012.
Decided: Jan. 26, 2012.
Russell G. Rogers, Appellant Pro Se. Dana James Boente, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Russell G. Rogers appeals the district court's order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion and reducing his sentence by one month to the statutory mandatory minimum. We previously remanded this matter to the district court for a determination as to the timeliness of the appeal. The appeal having been determined to be timely, we turn to the merits of the case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Rogers, No. 1:03-cr-00609-CMH-1 (E.D. Va. June 17, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.