Case Name: KEITH L. BRACKENBROUGH, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada
Jurisdiction: Nevada
Decision Date: 1975-07-23
Citations: 91 Nev. 487
Docket Number: No. 7862
Parties: KEITH L. BRACKENBROUGH, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Nevada Reports
Volume: 91
Pages: 487–487

Head Matter:
KEITH L. BRACKENBROUGH, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.
No. 7862
July 23, 1975
537 P.2d 1194
Halley and Halley, of Reno, for Appellant.
Larry R. Hicks, District Attorney, and Kathleen M. Wall, Assistant Chief Deputy District Attorney, Washoe County, for Respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION
Per Curiam:
Claiming ineffective counsel, Brackenbrough asks us to annul his conviction. He does not direct our attention to anything in the record of the trial to support his claim, but instead, relies solely upon assertions made in a letter he wrote to the presiding judge following conviction. On this direct appeal, we cannot credit such letter and the assertions therein contained. He may, of course, pursue the remedy accorded by the Post-Conviction Act, NRS 177.315-385, and obtain appropriate consideration of his claim of ineffective counsel. His other claimed error is without merit.
Affirmed.