Case Name: PERKUMPULAN INVESTOR CRISIS CENTER DRESSEL-WBG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Danny MK WONG, also known as Wong Man Kee; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-09-15
Citations: 395 F. App'x 442
Docket Number: No. 09-36059
Parties: PERKUMPULAN INVESTOR CRISIS CENTER DRESSEL-WBG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Danny MK WONG, also known as Wong Man Kee; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: HAWKINS, McKEOWN and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 395
Pages: 442–442

Head Matter:
PERKUMPULAN INVESTOR CRISIS CENTER DRESSEL-WBG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Danny MK WONG, also known as Wong Man Kee; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 09-36059.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Sept. 2, 2010.
Filed Sept. 15, 2010.
David R. Ebel, Averil Rothrock, Matthew Turetsky, Schwabe Williamson & Wyatt, PC, Seattle, WA, Douglas Gross, Esquire, General Counsel, Craig Weiner, Esquire, Hofheimer, Gartlir & Gross, New York, NY, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Danny MK Wong, Hong Kong, pro se.
Donald Sherer, Wrangell, AK, pro se.
Michelle Sherer, Wrangell, AK, pro se.
Kenneth McCabe, Hurricane, UT, pro se.
Juli E. Farris, Esquire, Gretchen Obrist, Lynn Lincoln Sarko, Keller Rohrback LLP, Stellman Keehnel, Nicole M. Tadano, DLA Piper US, LLP, Craig H. Howe, Esquire, Blake D. Miller, Esquire, Miller Guymon, PC, Stephen A. Smith, K & L Gates LLP, James C. Fowler, Vandeberg Johnson & Gandara, Jason W. Anderson, Esquire, Nicholas P. Scarpelli, Jr., Esquire, Carney Badley Spellman, P.S., Benjamin Jared Stone, Cozen O’Connor, Seattle, WA, Andrew L. Symons, Esquire, Inslee Best Doezie & Ryder, Bellevue, WA, John S. Ganz, Esquire, James A. Morsch, Butler Rubin Saltarelli & Boyd LLP, Chicago, IL, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: HAWKINS, McKEOWN and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
We adopt the well-considered opinion of the district court and affirm its judgment.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.