Case Name: Tuttle vers. Willington
Court: Superior Court of Judicature of the Province of Massachusetts Bay
Jurisdiction: Massachusetts
Decision Date: 1772-04
Citations: 1 Super. Ct. Jud. 335
Docket Number: 
Parties: Tuttle vers. Willington.
Judges: 
Reporter: Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Superior Court of Judicature of the Province of Massachusetts Bay, between 1761 and 1772
Volume: 1
Pages: 335–336

Head Matter:
Tuttle vers. Willington.
Payment by the Maker to the Promisee of a Note on Demand is a good Defence to subsequent indorsee for Value without Notice.

Opinion:
PLAINTIFF declared on a promissory Note made by the Defendant to one Winship, and by him indorsed to the Plaintiff. There was a Payment to Winship before Assignment. When this appeared, the Court told the Plaintiff that this Point was settled against him on a Special Verdict, found at Cambridge, August Term, 1763, in the Cause of Russell & Oaks ; and fo solemnly determined on full Argument in the Court-House in Boston.
1772.
Judgment for Defendant.
Ante, p. 48.