Case Name: Helen Gloria BERK, Appellant, v. Earnest Irving BERK, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1973-01-22
Citations: 272 So. 2d 859
Docket Number: No. 72-753
Parties: Helen Gloria BERK, Appellant, v. Earnest Irving BERK, Appellee.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 272
Pages: 859–859

Head Matter:
Helen Gloria BERK, Appellant, v. Earnest Irving BERK, Appellee.
No. 72-753.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan. 22, 1973.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 26, 1973.
Theodore M. Epstein, Miami, for appellant.
Michael J. Silverstein, Miami Beach, for appellee.
Before BARKDULL, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By this interlocutory appeal, the appellant seeks review of an order denying a motion for garnishment after judgment and granting a motion to quash same.
The appellant has not favored us with the original judgment, the motion for garnishment or the motion to quash. Therefore, we have no alternative but to affirm the action of the trial judge here under review. Best v. Barnette, Fla.App.1961, 130 So.2d 90; Santona-Nervia Corporation v. Publix Market, Inc., Fla.App.1962, 146 So.2d 394; Curtiss-Wright Corporation v. King, Fla.App.1968, 207 So.2d 294; Jones v. First National Bank in Fort Lauderdale, Fla.App.1969, 226 So.2d 834; Rule 4.2, subd. d, F.A.R., 32 F.S.A.
Affirmed.