Case Name: Frances E. Moore, Respondent, v. The Board of Education of the City of New York, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1909-06-01
Citations: 195 N.Y. 601
Docket Number: 
Parties: Frances E. Moore, Respondent, v. The Board of Education of the City of New York, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 195
Pages: 601–601

Head Matter:
Frances E. Moore, Respondent, v. The Board of Education of the City of New York, Appellant.
Reported below, 131 App. Div. 863.
(Argued May 18, 1909;
decided June 1, 1909.)
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in' the first judicial department, entered November 22, 1907, which affirmed a determination of the Appellate Term affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the Municipal Court of the city of New York in an action to recover salary alleged to be due plaintiff as a school teacher.
Francis It. Pendleton, Corporation Counsel (Theodore Cormoly and Charles McIntyre of counsel), for appellant.
John F. O'Brien for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The appeal in this case cannot be determined on the present state of the record. We know of no reason why the entry of a judgment on the order of the Appellate Division affirming a judgment carried to it from the Municipal Court through the Appellate Term should be dispensed with any more than in the case of other appeals. The determination of this appeal will, therefore, be suspended until the successful party enters a judgment on the order of affirmance of the Appellate Division. When such a judgment is entered the defendant may take an appeal therefrom. Upon the addition of these necessary , papers to the present record in this court the court will dispose of the case on its merits without requiring the parties to appear for further argument.
Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ., concur; Cullen, Ch. J., absent.
Ordered accordingly.