Case Name: Frederick L. PITCHFORD, Appellant, v. Denzil Price MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge, Personal Capacity; H. David Young, Magistrate Judge, Personal Capacity; Jane A. Kim, Attorney, Officer of the Court, Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-06-06
Citations: 417 F. App'x 581
Docket Number: No. 11-1166
Parties: Frederick L. PITCHFORD, Appellant, v. Denzil Price MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge, Personal Capacity; H. David Young, Magistrate Judge, Personal Capacity; Jane A. Kim, Attorney, Officer of the Court, Appellees.
Judges: Before BYE, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 417
Pages: 581–581

Head Matter:
Frederick L. PITCHFORD, Appellant, v. Denzil Price MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge, Personal Capacity; H. David Young, Magistrate Judge, Personal Capacity; Jane A. Kim, Attorney, Officer of the Court, Appellees.
No. 11-1166.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: May 24, 2011.
Filed: June 6, 2011.
Frederick L. Pitchford, Earle, AR, pro se.
Before BYE, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Frederick Pitchford appeals the district court's preservice dismissal of his civil rights action. We conclude that dismissal was proper. See Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 11-12, 112 S.Ct. 286, 116 L.Ed.2d 9 (1991) (per curiam) (judicial immunity); Kurtz v. City of Shrewsbury, 245 F.3d 753, 758 (8th Cir.2001) (requirements for conspiracy claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1985); Jensen v. Henderson, 315 F.3d 854, 863 (8th Cir.2002) (42 U.S.C. § 1986 claim depends on existence of valid § 1985 claim). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.