Case Name: CENTURY AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Appellant, v. HANNAH, ESTES INGRAHAM, P.A., etc., et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2005-03-11
Citations: 900 So. 2d 623
Docket Number: No. 5D04-1508
Parties: CENTURY AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Appellant, v. HANNAH, ESTES INGRAHAM, P.A., etc., et al., Appellees.
Judges: SAWAYA, C.J., PETERSON and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 900
Pages: 623–623

Head Matter:
CENTURY AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Appellant, v. HANNAH, ESTES INGRAHAM, P.A., etc., et al., Appellees.
No. 5D04-1508.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
March 11, 2005.
Rehearing Denied May 2, 2005.
Mark Hicks and Susan Y. Marcus, of Hicks & Kneale, P.A., Hollywood, for Appellant.
Hala A. Sandridge, of Fowler, White, Boggs, Banker, P.A., Tampa, for Appel-lees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Eldred v. Reber, 639 So.2d 1086, 1088 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) ("We hold that for purposes of determining when the statute of limitations begins to accrue in a litigational malpractice action when the underlying action is appealed, the time begins to accrue when the appellate decision is 'rendered' as that term is defined in Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.020 [ (h) ]").
SAWAYA, C.J., PETERSON and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.