Case Name: Hector L. RIVERA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2011-03-18
Citations: 56 So. 3d 906
Docket Number: No. 5D10-4394
Parties: Hector L. RIVERA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SAWAYA, TORPY and LAWSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 56
Pages: 906–906

Head Matter:
Hector L. RIVERA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D10-4394.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
March 18, 2011.
Hector L. Rivera, Raiford, pro se.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Megan Saillant, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Ap-pellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The trial court summarily denied Appellant's motion without attaching records or providing reasons. Perhaps the trial court believed the motion was successive because of the way Appellant labeled his motion. It is neither successive nor untimely. It is facially insufficient, however, but Appellant should have been given an opportunity to amend the motion. Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754 (Fla.2007). The State properly concedes error.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
SAWAYA, TORPY and LAWSON, JJ., concur.