Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William E. JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-08-11
Citations: 612 F. App'x 584
Docket Number: No. 15-10018
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William E. JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before HULL, ROSENBAUM and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 612
Pages: 584–584

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William E. JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-10018
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Aug. 11, 2015.
Adam W. Overstreet, Kenyen Ray Brown, Vicki M. Davis, Michele Carstens O’Brien, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Mobile, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
William Gregory Hughes, W. Gregory Hughes, PC, Mobile, AL, for Defendant Appellant.
Before HULL, ROSENBAUM and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
William Gregory Hughes, appointed counsel for William E. Jackson in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396; 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Jackson's conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.