Case Name: William DARNABY v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1934-01-17
Citations: 67 S.W.2d 1113
Docket Number: No. 16216
Parties: William DARNABY v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 67
Pages: 1113–1114

Head Matter:
William DARNABY v. STATE.
No. 16216.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Jan. 17, 1934.
E. T. Adams, of Dallas, and J. K. Russell and A. C. Chrisman, both of Cleburne, for appellant. ■ ■
Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
MORROW, Presiding Judge.
The offense is rape; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for five years.
The prosecutrix, Lena McFall, testified that on the 17th day of February, 1932, the appellant had intercourse with her by force. She was 16 years of age at the timé. She subsequently gave birth to a child which she churned was the result of the intercourse with the appellant upon the occasion mentioned.
The appellant introduced the testimony of medical men who expressed the opinion that under the circumstances detailed by the pros-ecutrix her pregnancy was improbable, though not impossible.
There are no bills of exception and no complaint of the charge of the court.
The motion for new trial complains of the action of the court in ruling upon the qualification of the jurors, but the matter is not verified in any manner that would justify a reversal.
Perceiving no error in the record, the judgment is affirmed.