Case Name: DILLINGHAM v. BAKLEY et ux.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1907-05-07
Citations: 152 F. 1022
Docket Number: No. 701
Parties: DILLINGHAM v. BAKLEY et ux.
Judges: Before PRITCHARD, Circuit Judge, and MeDOWELL, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter
Volume: 152
Pages: 1022–1022

Head Matter:
DILLINGHAM v. BAKLEY et ux.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
May 7, 1907.)
No. 701.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
L. L. Lewis, U. S. Atty. (Ro. H. Talley, Asst. U. S. Atty., on the brief), for appellant.
Mary Phil-brook, for appellees.
Before PRITCHARD, Circuit Judge, and MeDOWELL, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have carefully considered the questions involved in this case, and' we find no error in the rulings of the learned judge who tried the case below. Therefore we affirm the judgment of the court below, fully concurring in the opinion, which is to be found in 148 Fed. 56.