Case Name: Daniel SCHIBBELHUT, Claimant/Respondent, v. SPECIALIZED MOTOR SYSTEMS, INC., Employer/Appellant, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2011-03-22
Citations: 334 S.W.3d 924
Docket Number: No. ED 94867
Parties: Daniel SCHIBBELHUT, Claimant/Respondent, v. SPECIALIZED MOTOR SYSTEMS, INC., Employer/Appellant, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent.
Judges: Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 334
Pages: 924–925

Head Matter:
Daniel SCHIBBELHUT, Claimant/Respondent, v. SPECIALIZED MOTOR SYSTEMS, INC., Employer/Appellant, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent.
No. ED 94867.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
March 22, 2011.
Timothy K. Kellett, Horas, Radice & Kellett, L.L.C., St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Daniel Schibbelhut, Sullivan, MO, Claimant/Respondent Acting pro se.
Bart A. Matanic, Department of Labor and Industrial Relations-Division of Employment Security, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Employer, Specialized Motor Systems, Inc., appeals from an order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission finding claimant, Daniel Schibbelhut, eligible for unemployment benefits.
The order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).