Case Name: Quintin GRAY, Sr., Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2014-11-12
Citations: 475 S.W.3d 676
Docket Number: No. ED 100661
Parties: Quintin GRAY, Sr., Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 475
Pages: 676–676

Head Matter:
Quintin GRAY, Sr., Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 100661
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
FILED: November 12, 2014
Edward Scott Thompson, Missouri Public Defender Office, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Andrew C. Hooper, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.
Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Quintín Gray, Sr. (Movant) appeals from the motion court's Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on Movant's Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence denying Movant's Rule 29.15 claims for post-conviction relief. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).