Case Name: HEAD v. TEXAS RAWHIDE PAVING CO.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1927-11-22
Citations: 22 F.2d 554
Docket Number: No. 4941
Parties: HEAD v. TEXAS RAWHIDE PAVING CO.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 22
Pages: 554–554

Head Matter:
HEAD v. TEXAS RAWHIDE PAVING CO.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
November 22, 1927.
No. 4941.
Mark McMahon, of Fort Worth, Tex. (Cantey, Hanger & McMahon, of Port Worth, Tex., on the brief), for plaintiff in error.
Hugh B. Smith, of Port Worth, Tex. (Slay, Simon & Smith and Ogden K. Shannon, Jr., all of Port Worth, Tex., on the brief), for defendant in error.
Before WALKER, BRYAN, and POSTER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
A reversal is sought in this ease because of the overruling of a motion of the plaintiff in error, the defendant below, "to strike out all of the oral evidence," and because of the action of the court in giving and refusing instructions to the jury. The last-mentioned rulings are not subject to be reviewed, because none of them was excepted to. The above-mentioned motion was made after the admission, without objection, so far as the record shows, of much oral evidence, some'at least of which was plainly admissible. Manifestly the overruling of that motion was not reversible error.
No reversible error bein'g shown by the record, the judgment is affirmed.