Case Name: The State vs. Alonzo G. B. Anderson
Court: Delaware Court of General Sessions
Jurisdiction: Delaware
Decision Date: 1893-09
Citations: 1 Marv. 526
Docket Number: 
Parties: The State vs. Alonzo G. B. Anderson.
Judges: 
Reporter: Delaware Reports
Volume: 15
Pages: 526–527

Head Matter:
The State vs. Alonzo G. B. Anderson.
New Castle County,
September Term, 1893.
Jurisdiction, Municipal Court. Assault.—The Municipal Court of the City . of Wilmington has exclusive jurisdiction of assault in said city.
The defendant was indicted for assault and battery upon an inspector of elections in the City of Wilmington, the indictment being drawn under Sec. 2, of Chap. 727, Vol. 19, Laws of Delaware. That section provides that from and after the passage of that act “ The Board of Public Education in Wilmington, the registration, election and canvass of the vote cast thereat shall in all respects be conducted in conformity with the provisions of the election and registration laws governing general elections in the City of Wilmington, except as in this act otherwise provided.”
The effect of this provision was to incorporate certain provisions of Chap. 39, Vol. 19, Laws of Delaware, Sec. 47, of which reads as follows: “ If any person shall knowingly or wilfully obstruct, hinder, assault, or by bribery, solicitation or otherwise interfere with any inspector of election, poll clerk or challenger in the performance of any duty required of him, or which he may by law be authorized or permitted to perform * * * * every such person shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by imprisonment in the county jail for not more than two years, or by a fine of not more than two hundred dollars, or both.”
By Sec. 53 of the same act it was made the special duty of the Attorney General “ to immediately prosecute all complaints which may be made of a violation of any of the provisions of this act to final judgment.”
Hayes and Ward, for the defendant,
moved to quash the writ for want of jurisdiction. They contended that under the charter of the City of Wilmington creating the Municipal Court the sole and exclusive jurisdiction of the offence charged was vested in that court. The act provides that “ the said Municipal Court shall have sole and exclusive jurisdiction to inquire of, hear, try and finally determine all those criminal matters and offences enumerated in the fifteenth section of the sixth article of the amended constitution and committed within said city, and to punish all persons convicted of said offenses, or any of them, agreeably to the laws of this State.” 17 Del. Laws ch. 207 § 15.
Under this provision therefore the Municipal Court is constitutionally established and invested with this jurisdiction and the sole cognizances of assault and batteries as vested in it.
Giles, Deputy Attorney General, for the State. This being a penal statute in derogation of the common law it must be strictly construed; Sutherland, Statutory Construction, § 349.
Where a later statute contains no reference to the former statute and defines an offence containing some of the elements constituting the offence defined in such former statute and other elements it is a new and substantive offence, and where a new law covers the whole subject matter of an old one, adds new offences, and prescribes different penalties for those enumerated in the old law, then such former law is repealed by implication. Southerland, Statutory Construction, §§ 143,380.

Opinion:
Lore, C. J.,
delivered the opinion of the Court.
This is an indictment for assault and battery. You describe the party as an election officer in the city of Wilmington: that appears upon the face of the indictment. This is in a court of inferior jurisdiction. The Legislature has seen fit to create the Municipal Court, and to that court it has given sole and exclusive jurisdiction—among other things—of assaults. This is an assault; and we think the jurisdiction extends not only to common law assaults but to any assault created by statute, unless the Municipal Court was distinctly ousted by express terms. We think this indictment ought to be quashed, and so order.