Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Franklin Andres VIDES-ESPINOZA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-08-18
Citations: 696 F. App'x 132
Docket Number: No. 16-41717 Conference Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Franklin Andres VIDES-ESPINOZA, Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 696
Pages: 132–133

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Franklin Andres VIDES-ESPINOZA, Defendant-Appellant
No. 16-41717 Conference Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed August 18, 2017
Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Franklin Andres Vides-Espinoza, Pro Se
Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Franklin Andres Vides-Espi- noza has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (6th Cir. 2011). Vides-Espinoza has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We coiicur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivo-lous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has-determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.