Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Antrantrino LEE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-06-29
Citations: 385 F. App'x 345
Docket Number: No. 10-6069
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Antrantrino LEE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 385
Pages: 345–345

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Antrantrino LEE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-6069.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 16, 2010.
Decided: June 29, 2010.
Michael Antrantrino Lee, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael Antrantrino Lee appeals the district court's order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Lee's motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lee, No. 5:01-cr-00221-H-1 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 10, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.