Case Name: The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Lance, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1998-11-25
Citations: 84 Ohio St. 3d 17
Docket Number: Nos. 98-603 and 98-605
Parties: The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Lance, Appellant.
Judges: Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 84
Pages: 17–18

Head Matter:
The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Lance, Appellant.
[Cite as State v. Lance (1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 17.]
(Nos. 98-603 and 98-605
Submitted October 13, 1998
Decided November 25, 1998.)
Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Sherry Green, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
Schuh & Goldberg and Raul E. Tellez, for appellant.

Opinion:
The judgment of the court of appeals on Propositions of Law Nos. I and II is affirmed on the authority of State v. Cook (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570.
Propositions of Law Nos. Ill, IV, and V are dismissed as having been improvidently allowed.
Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Moyer, C.J., and Cook, J., concur in part and dissent in part.