Case Name: In the Matter of J. J. A., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. J. J. A., Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2013-10-02
Citations: 258 Or. App. 725
Docket Number: 130161019; A153542
Parties: In the Matter of J. J. A., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. J. J. A., Appellant.
Judges: Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Nakamoto, Judge, and Egan, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 258
Pages: 725–726

Head Matter:
Submitted August 2,
reversed October 2, 2013
In the Matter of J. J. A., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. J. J. A., Appellant.
Multnomah County Circuit Court
130161019; A153542
311 P3d 900
Garrett A. Richardson and Multnomah Defenders, Inc., filed the brief for appellant.
Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General, and Rebecca M. Johansen, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Nakamoto, Judge, and Egan, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. He asserts that the state failed to prove, by clear and convincing evidence, that, because of a mental disorder, he is unable to provide for his basic personal needs. ORS 426.005(l)(e)(B). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the involuntary commitment and that the judgment cannot stand. We agree, accept the state's concession, and reverse on that basis. Accordingly, we do not address appellant's other, unpreserved assignment of error, in which he contends that the trial court erred in failing to advise him of the possible results of the commitment proceeding as required by ORS 426.100(l)(c).
Reversed.