Case Name: Ratko Vulovich et al., Appellants, v. Stephen P. Baich, Respondent, et al., Defendant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1956-04-19
Citations: 1 N.Y.2d 735
Docket Number: 
Parties: Ratko Vulovich et al., Appellants, v. Stephen P. Baich, Respondent, et al., Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 1
Pages: 735–737

Head Matter:
Ratko Vulovich et al., Appellants, v. Stephen P. Baich, Respondent, et al., Defendant.
Argued March 21, 1956;
decided April 19, 1956.
Francis J. Riordan for appellants.
Edmond J. Shea for respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed, with costs. In reaching the conclusion that the judgment should be affirmed, we do not find it necessary to rule upon the applicability of section 347 of the Civil Practice Act. No opinion.
Concur: Conway, Ch. J., Desmond, Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis and Burke, JJ. Taking no part: Froessel, J.