Case Name: Harold S. Clark, Appellant, v. George A. Reynolds, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1941-03-04
Citations: 285 N.Y. 611
Docket Number: 
Parties: Harold S. Clark, Appellant, v. George A. Reynolds, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 285
Pages: 611–612

Head Matter:
Harold S. Clark, Appellant, v. George A. Reynolds, Respondent.
Submitted February 24, 1941;
decided March 4, 1941.
Harold S. Clark, in person, for motion.
No one opposed.

Opinion:
Motion denied. The moving papers do not indicate that the plaintiff moved for a direction of a verdict or that the trial court erred in submitting questions of fact to the jury. Upon an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division reversing a judgment on the facts and granting a new trial, this court may consider only whether " as matter of law on the evidence the plaintiff was entitled to judgment." (Rockowitz C. & B. Corp. v. Madame X Co., 248 N. Y. 272.)