Case Name: Stephen ZNEIMER, Appellant, v. Craig M. ZINN, David M. Zinn and Warren H. Zinn, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1986-03-04
Citations: 483 So. 2d 879
Docket Number: No. 85-1395
Parties: Stephen ZNEIMER, Appellant, v. Craig M. ZINN, David M. Zinn and Warren H. Zinn, Appellees.
Judges: Before HENDRY, HUBBART and FERGUSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 483
Pages: 879–880

Head Matter:
Stephen ZNEIMER, Appellant, v. Craig M. ZINN, David M. Zinn and Warren H. Zinn, Appellees.
No. 85-1395.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 4, 1986.
Thornton, Herndon, Mastrucci & Ferring-ton and Jerome A. Pivnik, Miami, for appellant.
Arky, Freed, Stearns, Watson, Greer & Weaver and R. Lawrence Bonner and Carol W. Soret, Miami, for appellees.
Before HENDRY, HUBBART and FERGUSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
A complaint which alleges a statutory basis for long-arm jurisdiction does not require further pleading or proof of jurisdiction unless controverted by a motion to dismiss along with evidence tending to show that the jurisdictional allegations are untrue. See Hyco Manufacturing Co. v. Rotex International Corp., 355 So.2d 471 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.070(0 and committee note to 1980 amendment.
Affirmed.