Case Name: Donald CROSS, Claimant/Appellant, v. DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-04-10
Citations: 364 S.W.3d 263
Docket Number: No. ED 96933
Parties: Donald CROSS, Claimant/Appellant, v. DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 364
Pages: 263–263

Head Matter:
Donald CROSS, Claimant/Appellant, v. DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 96933.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
April 10, 2012.
Donald Cross, University City, MO, Acting Pro Se.
Robert A. Bedell, Jefferson City, MO, For Respondent/Respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Donald Cross (Claimant) appeals from the award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (the Commission) denying him unemployment benefits. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the Appeals Tribunal's decision that Claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits because he voluntarily quit his employment is final and not subject to our review here because Claimant's appeal before the Commission was previously filed out of time; and this Court will not review Claimant's voluntary quit determination in a subsequent determination regarding an unemployment benefit overpayment. See Lockridge v. American Group, Inc., 193 S.W.3d 836, 838 (Mo.App. E.D.2006). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).