Case Name: Rashane JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2016-04-12
Citations: 190 So. 3d 660
Docket Number: No. 1D14-4129
Parties: Rashane JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: WETHERELL, RAY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 190
Pages: 660–661

Head Matter:
Rashane JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D14-4129.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
April 12, 2016.
Rehearing Denied May 25, 2016.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Richard M. Bracey, III, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Matthew Pavese, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm Appellant's conviction without comment, but we reverse his sentence and remand for resentencing because, although the trial court correctly determined based on then-controlling appellate decisions that it was required to impose conséctitive mandatory minimum terms under the 10-20-Life statute, the Florida Supreme Court subsequently quashed one of those decisions .and held that consecutive sentencing is permissible but not mandatory. See Williams v. State, 186 So.3d 989 (Fla.2016) ("If . multiple firearm offenses are committed contemporaneously, during which time. multiple victims are shot at, then consecutive sentencing is permissible but not mandatory. In other words, a trial judge has discretion to order the mandatory minimum sentences to run consecutively, but may impose the sentences concurrently.") (citations omitted).
AFFIRMED in,part; REVERSED, and REMANDED in part.
WETHERELL, RAY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.