Case Name: ELIZABETH ATCHINSON, RESPONDENT, v. COLGATE & COMPANY, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1926-02-01
Citations: 102 N.J.L. 425
Docket Number: 
Parties: ELIZABETH ATCHINSON, RESPONDENT, v. COLGATE & COMPANY, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 102
Pages: 425–425

Head Matter:
ELIZABETH ATCHINSON, RESPONDENT, v. COLGATE & COMPANY, APPELLANT.
Submitted October 29, 1925
Decided February 1, 1926.
For the respondent, Erwin & Erwin.
For the appellant, Wall, Haight, Carey & Hartpence.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Teenchard, Parker, Minturn, Katzenbach, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.