Case Name: In the Matter of D. R. B., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. D. R. B., Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2007-07-11
Citations: 214 Or. App. 149
Docket Number: 060767596; A133129
Parties: In the Matter of D. R. B., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. D. R. B., Appellant.
Judges: Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Schuman and Ortega, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 214
Pages: 149–150

Head Matter:
Submitted on record and briefs June 1,
reversed July 11, 2007
In the Matter of D. R. B., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. D. R. B., Appellant.
Multnomah County Circuit Court
060767596; A133129
162 P3d 381
Lance D. Perdue filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Katherine H. Waldo, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Schuman and Ortega, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
In this mental commitment case, appellant contends that the trial court erred in finding that, because of a mental disorder, he is either dangerous to himself or presently unable to provide for his own basic needs. ORS 426.005(l)(d). He contends that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the court's order of commitment. The state concedes the point. On de novo review, we agree and accept the concession.
Reversed.