Case Name: Frank Anthony PACE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent; Johnny Lee SANDERS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent; Patrick KELLER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent; Willie HAMPTON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1979-07-26
Citations: 373 So. 2d 911
Docket Number: Nos. 52757, 52826, 52850 and 52891
Parties: Frank Anthony PACE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent. Johnny Lee SANDERS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent. Patrick KELLER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent. Willie HAMPTON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: ENGLAND, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON and SUNDBERG, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 373
Pages: 911–911

Head Matter:
Frank Anthony PACE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent. Johnny Lee SANDERS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent. Patrick KELLER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent. Willie HAMPTON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Nos. 52757, 52826, 52850 and 52891.
Supreme Court of Florida.
July 26, 1979.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and James L. Eisenberg, Craig S. Barnard, Jerry L. Schwarz and Marc R. Goldstein, Asst. Public Defenders, West Palm Peach, for petitioners.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Charles A. Stampelos, Joy B. Shearer and Robert L. Bogen, Asst. Attys. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The petitions for writ of certiorari were consolidated. We issued the writs and have heard argument of the parties. The issue is identical to the certified question answered by this court in Grubbs v. State, 373 So.2d 905 (Fla.1979).
For the reasons expressed in our opinion in Grubbs, the district court decisions in these eases are quashed to the extent they approve the unilateral granting to law enforcement officers of additional authority to conduct warrantless searches of probationers. These cases are remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
It is so ordered.
ENGLAND, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON and SUNDBERG, JJ., concur.