Case Name: Goldstein v. Liebowitz, Appellant
Court: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1937-01-29
Citations: 124 Pa. Super. 542
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 391
Parties: Goldstein v. Liebowitz, Appellant.
Judges: Before Keller, P. J., Cunningham, BaldBIGE, STADTFELD, PARKER, JAMES and RHODES, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania Superior Court Reports
Volume: 124
Pages: 542–542

Head Matter:
Goldstein v. Liebowitz, Appellant.
Argued November 13, 1936.
Before Keller, P. J., Cunningham, BaldBIGE, STADTFELD, PARKER, JAMES and RHODES, JJ.
Jacob 8. Richman, with him Philip Richman, of Rich-man <& Richman, for appellant.
Henry W. Balka, for appellee, was not heard.
January 29, 1937:

Opinion:
Per Curiam,
No issues were raised on the trial of this case but questions of fact, which were for the decision of the trial judge sitting without a jury. His findings in favor of the plaintiff are supported by testimony not inherently improbable and have the force and effect of the verdict of a jury. They were sustained by the court in banc, which refused a new trial.
No sufficient reason has been given us for reversing this action of the court below.
Judgment affirmed,