Case Name: Montez L. RILEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-10-23
Citations: 58 S.W.3d 895
Docket Number: No. ED 78946
Parties: Montez L. RILEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before MARY R. RUSSELL, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR. and MARY K. HOFF, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 58
Pages: 895–895

Head Matter:
Montez L. RILEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 78946.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Oct. 23, 2001.
Lisa M. Stroup, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Karen L. Kramer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before MARY R. RUSSELL, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR. and MARY K. HOFF, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Montez Riley appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact and conclusions of law that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).