Case Name: Bertha Wahl and Joseph M. Seyfried, Respondents, v. Mary Seyfried and Albert Seyfried, Individually and as Executors, etc., of Magdalene Seyfried, Deceased, Appellants, and Another, Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1940-11-20
Citations: 260 A.D. 993
Docket Number: 
Parties: Bertha Wahl and Joseph M. Seyfried, Respondents, v. Mary Seyfried and Albert Seyfried, Individually and as Executors, etc., of Magdalene Seyfried, Deceased, Appellants, and Another, Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 260
Pages: 993–993

Head Matter:
Bertha Wahl and Joseph M. Seyfried, Respondents, v. Mary Seyfried and Albert Seyfried, Individually and as Executors, etc., of Magdalene Seyfried, Deceased, Appellants, and Another, Defendant.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. All concur, except Taylor and Dowling, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and facts and for dismissal of the complaint on the ground that the findings that the contract alleged in the complaint was made are contrary to and against the weight of the evidence. (See Tracy v. Danzinger, 253 App. Div. 418; affd., 279 N. Y. 679.) (The judgment is for plaintiffs in an action to compel specific performance of an agreement.) Present — Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.