Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wayne EVERETTE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-06-14
Citations: 134 F. App'x 181
Docket Number: No. 02-30221
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Wayne EVERETTE, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: HALL, KLEINFELD, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 134
Pages: 181–181

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Wayne EVERETTE, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 02-30221.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 9, 2004.
Decided June 14, 2005.
Mark A. Rosenbaum, AUSA, USAK-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Anchorage, AK, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Joe P. Josephson, Esq., Anchorage, AK, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: HALL, KLEINFELD, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Appellant Wayne Everette appeals the sentence imposed upon him for his convictions for conspiracy to traffic in cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, and possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Everette contends that the district court violated the Sixth Amendment by (1) determining the quantity of cocaine involved in Everette's offense and (2) deciding that his role in the offense was supervisory. Because Everette did not challenge his sentences on these grounds in the district court, we grant a limited remand pursuant to United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc).
REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.