Case Name: Garrett M. MARSHALL, Employee, v. STEINBRECHER PAINTING, INC., and Meadowbrook Claims Services, Relators, and Minnesota Department of Labor & Industry, Workers' Compensation Division, Respondent
Court: Minnesota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Minnesota
Decision Date: 2009-01-28
Citations: 759 N.W.2d 891
Docket Number: No. A08-1673
Parties: Garrett M. MARSHALL, Employee, v. STEINBRECHER PAINTING, INC., and Meadowbrook Claims Services, Relators, and Minnesota Department of Labor & Industry, Workers’ Compensation Division, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: North Western Reporter 2d
Volume: 759
Pages: 891–891

Head Matter:
Garrett M. MARSHALL, Employee, v. STEINBRECHER PAINTING, INC., and Meadowbrook Claims Services, Relators, and Minnesota Department of Labor & Industry, Workers’ Compensation Division, Respondent.
No. A08-1673.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
Jan. 28, 2009.
T. Michael Kilbury, Peterson, Logren & Kilbury, P.A., St. Paul, MN, for relators.
Lori Swanson, Atty. Gen., Rory H. Foley, Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, MN, for respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed August 26, 2008, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that "[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view," doing no more than establishing the law of the case).
BY THE COURT:
/s/Eric J. Magnuson Chief Justice