Case Name: LONG DOCK COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE BOARD OF TAXES AND ASSESSMENT AND THE MAYOR AND ALDERMEN OF JERSEY CITY, RESPONDENTS
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1922-11-20
Citations: 98 N.J.L. 274
Docket Number: 
Parties: LONG DOCK COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE BOARD OF TAXES AND ASSESSMENT AND THE MAYOR AND ALDERMEN OF JERSEY CITY, RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 98
Pages: 274–274

Head Matter:
LONG DOCK COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE BOARD OF TAXES AND ASSESSMENT AND THE MAYOR AND ALDERMEN OF JERSEY CITY, RESPONDENTS.
Argued June 27, 1922
Decided November 20, 1922.
On appeal from the Supreme Court.
For the appellant, Collins & Corbin and Robert J. Bain.
For the respondents, Thomas J. Brogan and Edward P. Stout.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under "review herein will be affirmed, for the reasons given in the per curiam in Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. State Board of Taxes and Assessment et al., No. 45, of the present term of this court (post p. 283).
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Swayze, Parker, Black, Katzenbach, White, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.