Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clarence J. LOMAX, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-02-26
Citations: 313 F. App'x 646
Docket Number: No. 08-8321
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Clarence J. LOMAX, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 313
Pages: 646–647

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Clarence J. LOMAX, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 08-8321.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 19, 2009.
Decided: Feb. 26, 2009.
Clarence J. Lomax, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Ronald Gill, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Clarence J. Lomax appeals the district court's order denying the his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to Amendments 706 and 711 of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lomax, No. 3:00-cr-00406-RLW-1 (E.D.Va. Oct. 10, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.