Case Name: Frances Thomas, Appellant, v. Holy Trinity et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1959-06-11
Citations: 19 Misc. 2d 960
Docket Number: 
Parties: Frances Thomas, Appellant, v. Holy Trinity et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 19
Pages: 960–960

Head Matter:
Frances Thomas, Appellant, v. Holy Trinity et al., Respondents.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
June 11, 1959.
Jules D. Barnett for appellant.
Charles T. Beavers and Wilbert Eric Morris for respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
While the opening of the default cannot in the circumstances be treated as an abuse of discretion, the court should have directed that the judgment stand as security.
The order should be modified to direct that the judgment entered stand as security, and as modified affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to appellant.
Concur — Steuer, J. P., Hoestadter and Aurelio, JJ.
Order modified, etc.