Case Name: PINNACLE HEALTH HOSPITALS, Successor by Consolidation to Polyclinic Medical Center, Petitioner, v. DAUPHIN COUNTY BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS, County of Dauphin, School District of the City of Harrisburg, City of Harrisburg, Cross-Petitioner
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1998-08-07
Citations: 713 A.2d 1142
Docket Number: Petitions Nos. 0151-0152 Middle District Allocatur Docket 1998
Parties: PINNACLE HEALTH HOSPITALS, Successor by Consolidation to Polyclinic Medical Center, Petitioner, v. DAUPHIN COUNTY BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS, County of Dauphin, School District of the City of Harrisburg, City of Harrisburg, Cross-Petitioner.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 713
Pages: 1142–1143

Head Matter:
PINNACLE HEALTH HOSPITALS, Successor by Consolidation to Polyclinic Medical Center, Petitioner, v. DAUPHIN COUNTY BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS, County of Dauphin, School District of the City of Harrisburg, City of Harrisburg, Cross-Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Aug. 7, 1998.
Stephen A. Moore, James L. Fritz and John P. Neblett, Harrisburg, for petitioner.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 7th day of August, 1998, the Petitions for Allowance of Appeal are granted, limited to the following issue:
Does Polyclinic Medical Center operate entirely free from private profit motive as required by Hospital Utilization Project v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 507 Pa. 1, 487 A.2d 1306 (1985), for purposes of tax-exempt status?
This case is consolidated with Wilson Area School Distr., et al. v. Easton Hospital, — Pa.-, 713 A.2d 1143, for purposes of oral argument. The Cross-Petition for Allowance of Appeal is denied. The Motion to File Answer to Brief in Opposition to Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted.