Case Name: Zhenlu ZHANG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION; Computer Sciences Corporation, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-04-05
Citations: 174 F. App'x 177
Docket Number: No. 05-2015
Parties: Zhenlu ZHANG, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION; Computer Sciences Corporation, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 174
Pages: 177–177

Head Matter:
Zhenlu ZHANG, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION; Computer Sciences Corporation, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 05-2015.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 30, 2006.
Decided: April 5, 2006.
Zhenlu Zhang, Appellant Pro Se. Henry Adam Platt, J.C. Miller, Schmeltzer, Ap-taker & Shepard, P.C., Washington, D.C.; Edward Lee Isler, Steven William Ray, Ray & Isler, P.C., Vienna, Virginia; Larry Robert Seegull, Damon Loren Krieger, Dla Piper Rudnick Gray Cary U.S. L.L.P., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Zhenlu Zhang appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Science & Technology Corporation and Computer Sciences Corporation, and dismissing Zhang's employment discrimination and retaliation action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Zhang v. Science & Technology Corp., 382 F.Supp.2d 761 (D.Md.2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED