Case Name: Matteo RUSSONIELLO, Appellant, v. HAMILTON BANK, N.A., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1999-07-21
Citations: 740 So. 2d 576
Docket Number: No. 99-791
Parties: Matteo RUSSONIELLO, Appellant, v. HAMILTON BANK, N.A., Appellee.
Judges: Before GERSTEN, FLETCHER, and SHEVIN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 740
Pages: 576–576

Head Matter:
Matteo RUSSONIELLO, Appellant, v. HAMILTON BANK, N.A., Appellee.
No. 99-791.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 21, 1999.
Rehearing Denied Sept. 29, 1999.
Homer, Bonner & Delgado, and Luis E. Delgado, and Lawrence B. Lambert, Miami, for appellant.
Tew & Nowak, and Jeffrey Tew, Miami, for appellee.
Before GERSTEN, FLETCHER, and SHEVIN, JJ.
Judge Shevin did not participate in oral argu-menl.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Based upon the doctrine of forum non conveniens, we reverse the trial court's order with directions to dismiss the fraudulent inducement claim. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.061; Kinney Sys., Inc. v. Continental Ins. Co., 674 So.2d 86 (Fla.1996); Cibar-Geigy Ltd. v. Fish Peddler, Inc., 691 So.2d 1111 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 699 So.2d 1372 (Fla.1997).
Reversed and remanded with directions.