Case Name: Gussie Rosenzweig, Appellant, v. The Dime Savings Bank of Williamsburg and Barnet Rosenzweig, Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1921-06
Citations: 198 A.D. 914
Docket Number: 
Parties: Gussie Rosenzweig, Appellant, v. The Dime Savings Bank of Williamsburg and Barnet Rosenzweig, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 198
Pages: 914–914

Head Matter:
Gussie Rosenzweig, Appellant, v. The Dime Savings Bank of Williamsburg and Barnet Rosenzweig, Respondents.

Opinion:
The real ownership of this bank deposit and how far it was known to Mr. Rosenzweig seem doubtful, and we, therefore, afford the plaintiff a new trial. Hence the judgment and findings numbered 4, 5 and 6, are severally reversed, with the conclusion of law, as against the weight of the evidence, and a new trial is granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. Blaekmar, P. J., Mills, Rich, Putnam and Jaycox, JJ., concur.