Case Name: J. Patrick SWETT, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-10-10
Citations: 829 So. 2d 901
Docket Number: No. SC01-1
Parties: J. Patrick SWETT, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: ANSTEAD, C.J., SHAW, WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., and HARDING, Senior Justice, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 829
Pages: 901–901

Head Matter:
J. Patrick SWETT, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. SC01-1.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Oct. 10, 2002.
Terrence E. Kehoe and Donald R. West, Orlando, FL, for Petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, FL, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted review of the decision in State v. Swett, 772 So.2d 48 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000), based on alleged express and direct conflict with Frazier v. State, 766 So.2d 459 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), and Daniels v. State, 568 So.2d 63 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Upon further consideration, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss this case.
It is so ordered.
ANSTEAD, C.J., SHAW, WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., and HARDING, Senior Justice, concur.