Case Name: IN RE: John Francis CURRAN, III, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-11-08
Citations: 700 F. App'x 303
Docket Number: No. 17-1872
Parties: IN RE: John Francis CURRAN, III, Petitioner.
Judges: Before MOTZ, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 700
Pages: 303–303

Head Matter:
IN RE: John Francis CURRAN, III, Petitioner.
No. 17-1872
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: November 1, 2017
Decided: November 8, 2017
John F. Curran, III, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before MOTZ, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
John Francis Curran, III, petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in acting on his civil action. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED