Case Name: Danny ARRINGTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-01-25
Citations: 155 S.W.3d 794
Docket Number: No. ED 84133
Parties: Danny ARRINGTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J. and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 155
Pages: 794–794

Head Matter:
Danny ARRINGTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 84133.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Jan. 25, 2005.
Mark A. Grothoff, Assistant Public Defender, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Karen L. Kramer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J. and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Danny Arrington ("Movant"), appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Following a jury trial, Movant was convicted of attempted forcible rape, sections 564.011 and 566.030, RSMo (1994), and first degree burglary, section 569.160. Movant was sentenced to concurrent terms of twenty years imprisonment for attempted forcible rape and fifteen years imprisonment for first degree burglary. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)." We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.
. All statutory references are to RSMo 1994 unless otherwise indicated.