Case Name: Sophia Lutensqui, Respondent, v. I. J. Sussman, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1957-02-07
Citations: 8 Misc. 2d 902
Docket Number: 
Parties: Sophia Lutensqui, Respondent, v. I. J. Sussman, Appellant.
Judges: Hecht, Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ., concur.
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 8
Pages: 902–903

Head Matter:
Sophia Lutensqui, Respondent, v. I. J. Sussman, Appellant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
February 7, 1957.
E. Edan Spencer and Robert D. Foglia for appellant.
Seymour J. Goldman and Abraham J. Yasgour for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The testimony of plaintiff and that of her lay witness, unsupported by expert testimony, is not sufficient to overcome the expert testimony of defendant that the dentures have been adjusted and the teeth are in proper occlusion (Young v. Wybrant, 61 N. Y. S. 2d 473).
The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, without costs.
Hecht, Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ., concur.
Judgment reversed, etc.