Case Name: Major SINGH, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-08-31
Citations: 108 F. App'x 522
Docket Number: No. 03-71367
Parties: Major SINGH, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: PREGERSON, KOZINSKI, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 108
Pages: 522–523

Head Matter:
Major SINGH, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 03-71367.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 9, 2004.
Decided Aug. 31, 2004.
Tsz-Hai Huang, Hardeep S. Rai, Earle A. Sylva, Tsz-Hai Huang, Rai & Assoc., San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.
Regional Counsel, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Richard M. Evans, Esq., John L. Davis, Larry P. Cote, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: PREGERSON, KOZINSKI, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Reviewing for substantial evidence, we determine that the Immigration Judge's adverse credibility finding is supported by Singh's inconsistent testimony about his fear of the police, which goes to the heart of his asylum and withholding claims. Chebchoub v. INS, 257 F.3d 1038, 1042-44 (9th Cir.2001).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.