Case Name: Denise L. SEVERINO-TODD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WAL-MART, INC., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-04-03
Citations: 470 F. App'x 139
Docket Number: No. 12-1095
Parties: Denise L. SEVERINO-TODD, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. WAL-MART, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 470
Pages: 139–139

Head Matter:
Denise L. SEVERINO-TODD, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. WAL-MART, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 12-1095.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 29, 2012.
Decided: April 3, 2012.
Denise L. Severino-Todd, Appellant Pro Se. Julie Kerr Adams, Angela Byrd Cummings, Littler Mendelson PC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Denise L. Severino-Todd appeals the district court's order granting the Defendant's motion to dismiss her employment discrimination action pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2000e-17 (West 2003 & Supp. 2010). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Severino-Todd v. Wal-Mart, Inc., No. 5:ll-cv-336-BR, 2011 WL 6370483 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 20, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.