Case Name: Eduardo MOREJON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1997-08-20
Citations: 698 So. 2d 613
Docket Number: No. 96-720
Parties: Eduardo MOREJON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before JORGENSON and SORONDO, JJ., and BARKDULL, Senior Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 698
Pages: 613–614

Head Matter:
Eduardo MOREJON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 96-720.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Aug. 20, 1997.
Rehearing Denied Sept. 17, 1997.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Bruce A. Rosenthal, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Douglas J. Glaid, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before JORGENSON and SORONDO, JJ., and BARKDULL, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Doctor v. State, 677 So.2d 1372 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (Schwartz, C.J., specially concurring) ("[The instructions] if erroneous, were not harmfully so in the light of the complete, and completely accurate instructions repeatedly given the jury on the burden of proof issue, particularly at the most critical time immediately before its deliberations."); Higginbotham v. State, 155 Fla. 274, 276-77, 19 So.2d 829, 830 (1944) ("[A] single instruction cannot be considered alone but must be considered in light of all other instructions bearing upon the same subject, and if, when so considered, the law appears to have been fairly presented to the jury, the assignment on the instruction must fail.").