Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Justin D. SHERRARD, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-01-24
Citations: 265 F. App'x 566
Docket Number: No. 07-30019
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Justin D. SHERRARD, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 265
Pages: 566–566

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Justin D. SHERRARD, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-30019.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 14, 2008.
Filed Jan. 24, 2008.
Marcia Good Hurd, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Billings, MT, for PlaintiffAppellee.
John P. Rhodes, Esq., Federal Defenders of Montana, Missoula, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: HALL, O’SCANNLAIN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Justin D. Sherrard appeals from the district court's denial of his motions to suppress following which, after a bench trial, the district court found Sherrard guilty of receipt of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(2), and possession of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Sherrard contends that the evidence collected, as well as the statements he made, during the search of his house should be suppressed because the search violated the Fourth Amendment and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41. We disagree. We are unpersuaded by Sherrard's reliance on United States v. Grubbs, 547 U.S. 90, 126 S.Ct. 1494, 164 L.Ed.2d 195 (2006), and Groh v. Ramirez, 540 U.S. 551, 124 S.Ct. 1284, 157 L.Ed.2d 1068 (2004), and so we affirm the district court's orders.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.