Case Name: THE UNION COUNTY PARK COMMISSION, A BODY POLITIC OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE COUNTY OF UNION, A BODY POLITIC OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, v. THE COUNTY OF HUDSON, A BODY POLITIC OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-INTERVENOR
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1977-06-03
Citations: 154 N.J. Super. 125
Docket Number: 
Parties: THE UNION COUNTY PARK COMMISSION, A BODY POLITIC OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE COUNTY OF UNION, A BODY POLITIC OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, v. THE COUNTY OF HUDSON, A BODY POLITIC OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-INTERVENOR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 154
Pages: 125–125

Head Matter:
THE UNION COUNTY PARK COMMISSION, A BODY POLITIC OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE COUNTY OF UNION, A BODY POLITIC OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, v. THE COUNTY OF HUDSON, A BODY POLITIC OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-INTERVENOR.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued May 3, 1977
Decided June 3, 1977.
Certification Denied September 27, 1977.
Before Judges Lynch, Milmed and Antell.
Mr. Richard R. Width argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Lindabury, McCormick & Esiabrook, attorneys).
Mr. William J. McCloud, County Counsel, aTgued the cause for respondent County of Union.
Mrs. Frances Lawrence Antonin, Assistant County Counsel, argued the cause for intervenor County of Hudson (Mr. Harold J. Ruvoldt, Jr., Hudson County Counsel, attorney).

Opinion:
Pee Curiam.
The order of June 17, 1976 under review is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Feller in his opinion, 154 N. J. Super. 213 (Law Div. 1976).