Case Name: Kenneth A. FRIEDMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-01-04
Citations: 465 F. App'x 600
Docket Number: No. 10-17812
Parties: Kenneth A. FRIEDMAN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 465
Pages: 600–600

Head Matter:
Kenneth A. FRIEDMAN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
No. 10-17812.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 19, 2011.
Filed Jan. 4, 2012.
Kenneth A. Friedman, Indian Springs, NV, pro se.
Robert J. Gower, Deputy District, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Kenneth A. Friedman, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court's order denying his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion for partial summary judgment. We dismiss.
We lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the district court's order "[did] not dispose of all claims and [did] not end the litigation on the merits," and is thus not a final, appealable order. Williamson v. UNUM Life Ins. Co. of Am., 160 F.3d 1247, 1250 (9th Cir.1998); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (appellate jurisdiction over "final decisions").
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.