Case Name: Stan MOTLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FULTON COUNTY, GEORGIA, et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-03-16
Citations: 815 F.3d 733
Docket Number: No. 15-11628
Parties: Stan MOTLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FULTON COUNTY, GEORGIA, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before JORDAN and BLACK, Circuit Judges, and KALLON, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 815
Pages: 733–734

Head Matter:
Stan MOTLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FULTON COUNTY, GEORGIA, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15-11628
Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
March 16, 2016.
Harlan S. Miller, III, Parks Chesin & Walbert, PC, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Sandy R. Burney, Kaye Woodard Bur-well, Jerolyn Webb Ferrari, Lanna Renee Hill, Nwakaego Nkumeh, R. David Ware, Kristen B. Williams, Fulton County Attor ney’s Office, Atlanta, GA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before JORDAN and BLACK, Circuit Judges, and KALLON, District Judge.
The Honorable Abdul K. Kallon, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Alabama, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Following a review of the record, and with the benefit of oral argument, we affirm the district court's grant of summary judgment. This is one of those rare cases where, despite the existence of a prima facie case and sufficient evidence of pretext, no rational jury could conclude that the termination was discriminatory. See Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc., 530 U.S. 133, 148, 120 S.Ct. 2097, 147 L.Ed.2d 105 (2000); Flowers v. Troup County, 803 F.3d 1327, 1339 (11th Cir.2015); Schnabel v. Abramson, 232 F.3d 83, 90-91 (2d Cir.2000).
AFFIRMED.