Case Name: Wastle SPEARS, and Lillian Spears, Appellants, v. William Metzer ENFINGER, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-12-22
Citations: 554 So. 2d 25
Docket Number: No. 88-2808
Parties: Wastle SPEARS, and Lillian Spears, Appellants, v. William Metzer ENFINGER, Appellee.
Judges: SMITH, THOMPSON and MINER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 554
Pages: 25–25

Head Matter:
Wastle SPEARS, and Lillian Spears, Appellants, v. William Metzer ENFINGER, Appellee.
No. 88-2808.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Dec. 22, 1989.
R. Glenn Arnold of Warfield, Crosby & Santurri, P.A., Pensacola, for appellants.
T. Sol Johnson of Johnson, Green, Lock-lin & Melvin, P.A., Milton, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellants, Wastle and Lillian Spears, have failed to show the way of necessity approved by the trial court was unreasonable, impracticable or substantially inadequate. Even though we, sitting as fact-finders, may have arrived at a different result, we cannot say that the trial court's exercise of authority was a reversible abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we herewith affirm the trial court's finding.
SMITH, THOMPSON and MINER, JJ., concur.