Case Name: Dexter E. DALE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Margarita PEREZ, Chairperson, Board of Prison Terms; et al., Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-06-18
Citations: 384 F. App'x 656
Docket Number: No. 06-56162
Parties: Dexter E. DALE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Margarita PEREZ, Chairperson, Board of Prison Terms; et al., Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 384
Pages: 656–656

Head Matter:
Dexter E. DALE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Margarita PEREZ, Chairperson, Board of Prison Terms; et al., Respondents-Appellees.
No. 06-56162.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 25, 2010.
Filed June 18, 2010.
Dexter E. Dale, Soledad, CA, pro se.
Lora Fox Martin, Esq., AGCA — Office of the California Attorney General, San Diego, CA, Jane Catherine Malich, Esq., AGCA — Office of the California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondents-Appellees.
Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
California state prisoner Dexter E. Dale appeals pro se from the district court's judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.
Dale contends that the Board's 2001 decision to deny him parole was not supported by "some evidence" and therefore violated his due process rights. The state court did not unreasonably conclude that some evidence supports the Board's decision. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d); see also Hayward v. Marshall, 603 F.3d 546, 562-64, 568-69 (9th Cir.2010).
Dale's remaining contentions are unpersuasive.
Dale's request for judicial notice is denied.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
. We certify for appeal, on our own motion, the issue of whether the 2001 decision of the California Board of Prison Terms ("Board") to deny parole violated due process.