Case Name: George N. ALLEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. B.J. BUNNELL, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1990-05-01
Citations: 901 F.2d 820
Docket Number: No. 88-6305
Parties: George N. ALLEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. B.J. BUNNELL, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHROEDER and BEEZER, Circuit Judges, and KING , District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 901
Pages: 820–821

Head Matter:
George N. ALLEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. B.J. BUNNELL, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 88-6305.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 1, 1990.
Before SCHROEDER and BEEZER, Circuit Judges, and KING , District Judge.
The Honorable Samuel P. King, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Hawaii, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
ORDER
The government has filed a "petition for rehearing" calling our attention to the Supreme Court's decision in Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288, 109 S.Ct. 1060, 1075, 103 L.Ed.2d 334 (1989) which appears to apply an even stricter test of retroactivity than that set forth in Allen v. Hardy, 478 U.S. 255, 258, 106 S.Ct. 2878, 2879-2880, 92 L.Ed.2d 199 (1986). The result in this case would thus be the same under the Teague analysis. The petition for rehearing is denied.