Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Felipe Preciado HERNANDEZ, aka Felipe, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-03-17
Citations: 58 F. App'x 736
Docket Number: No. 01-50620; D.C. No. CR-00-01097-SVW-01
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Felipe Preciado HERNANDEZ, aka Felipe, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 58
Pages: 736–736

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Felipe Preciado HERNANDEZ, aka Felipe, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 01-50620.
D.C. No. CR-00-01097-SVW-01.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 10, 2003.
Decided March 17, 2003.
Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Felipe Preciado Hernandez appeals from his guilty plea conviction and sentence for conspiracy to manufacture marijuana and possession with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 and 841(a)(1). Hernandez's counsel has filed a motion pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating there are no arguable issues for review and seeking to withdraw as counsel of record. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no issues for review. Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.