Case Name: Maria Acela Lopez MORALES; Claudia Ivette Mejia Lopez, Petitioners, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-03-26
Citations: 271 F. App'x 686
Docket Number: No. 06-72182
Parties: Maria Acela Lopez MORALES; Claudia Ivette Mejia Lopez, Petitioners, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 271
Pages: 686–686

Head Matter:
Maria Acela Lopez MORALES; Claudia Ivette Mejia Lopez, Petitioners, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 06-72182.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 18, 2008.
Filed March 26, 2008.
Before: CANBY, T.G. NELSON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Maria Acela Lopez Morales and her daughter Claudia Ivette Mejia Lopez, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge's decision denying Lopez Morales' application for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA's discretionary denial of cancellation of removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i) (the court lacks jurisdiction to review any judgment regarding the discretionary denial of relief under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b); see also Hosseini v. Gonzales, 471 F.3d 953, 956-57 (9th Cir.2006) (explaining that "[t]he REAL ID Act does not restore our jurisdiction [where the petitioner] does not argue that the BIA's discretionary denial was unconstitutional or unlawful").
We need not reach Lopez Morales' remaining contentions in light of our disposition.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.