Case Name: Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority, Appellant-Respondent, v. Hartford Insurance Company et al., Respondents-Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1992-11-18
Citations: 187 A.D.2d 1019
Docket Number: 
Parties: Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority, Appellant-Respondent, v Hartford Insurance Company et al., Respondents-Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 187
Pages: 1019–1019

Head Matter:
Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority, Appellant-Respondent, v Hartford Insurance Company et al., Respondents-Appellants.

Opinion:
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The court properly denied the motion and cross motion for summary judgment as premature. Whether coverage B of the insurance policy at issue applies at all depends upon the resolution of questions of fact in the Federal action (see generally, New York Pub. Interest Research Group v Carey, 42 NY2d 527, 531; Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 91 AD2d 317, 325-326). (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Lawton, Boehm and Doerr, JJ.