Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jessica Lynn WALLACE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-10-05
Citations: 657 F. App'x 627
Docket Number: No. 16-1138
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jessica Lynn WALLACE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 657
Pages: 627–628

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jessica Lynn WALLACE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-1138
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: September 7, 2016
Filed: October 5, 2016
Jamie Bowers, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Sioux City, IA, Martin Joseph McLaughlin, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Cedar Rapids, IA, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Iowa, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Jessica Lynn Wallace, Pro Se.
Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
[Unpublished]
PER CURIAM.
Federal inmate Jessica Wallace pled guilty to conspiring to distribute 500 grams or more of a substance containing methamphetamine, in -violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), and 846 (Count 1); possessing with intent to distribute 5 grams or more of actual methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B) (Count 2); and possessing a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) (Count 3). The district court sentenced her to concurrent prison terms of 120 months on Counts 1 and 2; a consecutive 60-month term on Count 3; and 5 years of supervised release. This appeal followed, in which Wallace's counsel has moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), arguing that the sentence was unreasonable based on Wallace's circumstances.
We conclude that counsel's argument lacks merit because Wallace's prison term represents the statutory minimum, and therefore it is not subject to review for reasonableness under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). See United States v. Gregg, 451 F.3d 930, 937 (8th Cir. 2006). Further, having independently reviewed the record under Benson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no non-frivolous issues for appeal.
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed, and counsel's motion to withdraw is granted.
. The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa.