Case Name: In the Matter of the Claim of Adeline V. Borton, Respondent, against McClintic Marshall Company, Appellant; State Industrial Board, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1929-03
Citations: 226 A.D. 709
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Claim of Adeline V. Borton, Respondent, against McClintic Marshall Company, Appellant. State Industrial Board, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 226
Pages: 709–709

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Claim of Adeline V. Borton, Respondent, against McClintic Marshall Company, Appellant. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

Opinion:
Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. . Van Kirk, P. J., Davis, Hill and Hasbrouek, JJ., concur; Hinman, J., dissents on the ground that there is no evidence to sustain the finding that the claimant was the common-law wife of deceased; and on the authority of Hill v. Vrooman (215 App. Div. 847; affd., 242 N. Y. 549).