Case Name: BROWN CRUMMER INVESTMENT COMPANY v. CITY OF BURBANK et al.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1938-06-24
Citations: 97 F.2d 993
Docket Number: No. 8754
Parties: BROWN CRUMMER INVESTMENT COMPANY v. CITY OF BURBANK et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 97
Pages: 993–993

Head Matter:
BROWN CRUMMER INVESTMENT COMPANY v. CITY OF BURBANK et al.
No. 8754.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
June 24, 1938.
Martin & Hugueniu and James G. Martin, all of Wichita, Kan., and Roscoe R. Hess, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
Ralph W. Swagler, City Atty., of Burbank, Cal., and Wm. Mackenzie Brown and Leon Thomas David, Sp. Counsel, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees Burbank et al.
E. C. Pyle, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees Ilammond et al.
Before GARRECHT, STEPHENS, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Upon stipulation of counsel for the respective parties, and good cause therefor appearing, it is ordered that the appeal herein be dismissed, that a decree of dismissal be filed and entered accordingly, and that the mandate of this court issue forthwith.