Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Emile NICKERSON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-03-14
Citations: 269 F. App'x 530
Docket Number: No. 07-30204
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Emile NICKERSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 269
Pages: 530–530

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Emile NICKERSON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-30204
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 14, 2008.
Maurice Landrieu, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Eastern District of Louisiana, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Harry Joseph Boyer, Jr., Federal Public Defender’s Office Eastern District of Louisiana, New Orleans, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before JOLLY, DAVIS and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Emile Nickerson was convicted of three counts of distributing crack cocaine and sentenced to serve ten years in prison. Nickerson appeals his convictions. He argues that he should have been permitted to withdraw his pleas because the district court did not accept them at rearraignment. Nickerson has shown no plain error in connection with this claim. See United States v. Vasquez, 216 F.3d 456, 459 (5th Cir.2000). Indeed, Nickerson has failed to show that the district court did not accept his plea at rearraignment. Rather, the record is unclear concerning when the plea was accepted. A fortiorari, Nickerson has shown no plain error in connection with his claim that he was entitled to withdraw his plea because it had not yet been accepted. See id. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.