Case Name: In re DREXEL BURNHAM LAMBERT INCORPORATED, Drexel Burnham Lambert Group Incorporated, Michael R. Milken, Lowell J. Milken, Cary J. Maultasch, and Pamela R. Monzert, Petitioners
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1989-02-21
Citations: 869 F.2d 116
Docket Number: Docket No. 88-3060
Parties: In re DREXEL BURNHAM LAMBERT INCORPORATED, Drexel Burnham Lambert Group Incorporated, Michael R. Milken, Lowell J. Milken, Cary J. Maultasch, and Pamela R. Monzert, Petitioners.
Judges: in Judge PIERCE’s concurrence in the denial of rehearing in banc:
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 869
Pages: 116–121

Head Matter:
In re DREXEL BURNHAM LAMBERT INCORPORATED, Drexel Burnham Lambert Group Incorporated, Michael R. Milken, Lowell J. Milken, Cary J. Maultasch, and Pamela R. Monzert, Petitioners.
Docket No. 88-3060.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Feb. 21, 1989.

Opinion:
MESKILL, Circuit Judge,
concurring
in Judge PIERCE's concurrence in the denial of rehearing in banc:
Although I was not a member of the panel hearing this matter, I concur with the sentiments expressed by Judge Pierce, who was a majority member of the panel, in his concurrence in the denial of rehearing in banc.