Case Name: INNOVATIVE PATENTS, LLC and Forcefield, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BRAIN-PAD, INC., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-04-06
Citations: 416 F. App'x 904
Docket Number: No. 2010-1531
Parties: INNOVATIVE PATENTS, LLC and Forcefield, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BRAIN-PAD, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 416
Pages: 904–904

Head Matter:
INNOVATIVE PATENTS, LLC and Forcefield, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BRAIN-PAD, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 2010-1531.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
April 6, 2011.
Before RADER, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and BRYSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ON MOTION
BRYSON, Circuit Judge.
ORDER
Brain-Pad, Inc. moves to dismiss Innovative Patents, LLC and Forcefield, LLC (Innovative)'s appeal for failure to prosecute. Innovative has failed to respond.
After missing their initial deadline to file an entry of appearance, certificate of interest, and docketing statement, this court directed Innovative to file those items by-October 12, 2010. Innovative has still failed to comply with that directive. Innovative has also failed to file its initial brief. Failure to comply with the court's rules, including the requirements for preparing and filing briefs and other papers may result in dismissal of an appeal for failure to prosecute. See Julien v. Zeringue, 864 F.2d 1572, 1574 (Fed.Cir.1989).
Accordingly,
It Is Ordered That:
The motion to dismiss is granted.