Case Name: Hugh Royal EPPS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert WAGNER, Attorney, Defendant-Appellee; Hugh Royal Epps, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gerald Thomas Zerkin, Attorney, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-06-01
Citations: 326 F. App'x 133
Docket Number: Nos. 09-6442, 09-6445
Parties: Hugh Royal EPPS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Robert WAGNER, Attorney, Defendant—Appellee. Hugh Royal Epps, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Gerald Thomas Zerkin, Attorney, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 326
Pages: 133–134

Head Matter:
Hugh Royal EPPS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Robert WAGNER, Attorney, Defendant—Appellee. Hugh Royal Epps, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Gerald Thomas Zerkin, Attorney, Defendant—Appellee.
Nos. 09-6442, 09-6445.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 21, 2009.
Decided: June 1, 2009.
Hugh Royal Epps, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Hugh Epps appeals district court orders dismissing his complaints without prejudice for failing to file in a timely manner a short plain statement of jurisdiction. Epps was free to amend the complaints to cure the defects. A dismissal without prejudice is not reviewable by this court unless the reasons stated for the dismissal clearly disclose that no amendment to the complaint could cure its defects. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir.1993). Because Epps could cure the defect in each complaint, we dismiss the appeals. Id. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.