Case Name: William T. ENG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-02-15
Citations: 166 F. App'x 694
Docket Number: No. 05-1665
Parties: William T. ENG, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 166
Pages: 694–694

Head Matter:
William T. ENG, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 05-1665.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 23, 2006.
Decided: Feb. 15, 2006.
David H. Shapiro, Ellen K. Renaud, Swick & Shapiro, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Agnis C. Chakravorty, Frank K. Friedman, Woods Rogers, P.L.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
William T. Eng appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment to Norfolk Southern Corp. on his race and national-origin discrimination claims under Title VII and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Eng v. Norfolk Southern Corp., No. CA-02-134-7 (W.D.Va. May 24, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.
AFFIRMED