Case Name: ACKERLEY COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Respondent on Review, v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY, Petitioner on Review
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1987-03-31
Citations: 303 Or. 165
Docket Number: LUBA 83-028, 83-034, 83-051; CA A34195; SC S31717
Parties: ACKERLEY COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Respondent on Review, v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY, Petitioner on Review.
Judges: MEMORANDUM OPINION
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 303
Pages: 165–170

Head Matter:
On petitioner’s motion filed January 13, to withdraw petition for review,
petition for review dismissed March 31, 1987
ACKERLEY COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Respondent on Review, v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY, Petitioner on Review.
(LUBA 83-028, 83-034, 83-051; CA A34195; SC S31717)
734 P2d 885
Peter A. Kasting, Assistant County Counsel, Portland, for petitioner on review.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Linde, J., dissented and filed an opinion in which Lent, and Carson, JJ., joined.
Appeal from decision of Land Use Board of Appeals. 72 Or App 617, 696 P2d 1140 (1985).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The petitioner on review, Multnomah County, has filed a motion which reads as follows:
"Petitioner herein, Multnomah County, hereby withdraws its Petition for Review as though the same was never filed, and moves the Court to dismiss the Petition without taking any other action. If the Court should refuse to grant this Motion to withdraw Petition and instead proposes to vacate the Court of Appeals Opinion involved herein, petitioner and respondent ask leave to be heard further on that matter."
Without expressing an opinion on the merits of this case, we dismiss the Petition for Review.