Case Name: Rickey McINTYRE, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Cross-Appellant
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-07-19
Citations: 564 So. 2d 243
Docket Number: No. 89-267
Parties: Rickey McINTYRE, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
Judges: W. SHARP, GOSHORN and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 564
Pages: 243–243

Head Matter:
Rickey McINTYRE, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
No. 89-267.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
July 19, 1990.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Kenneth Witts, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant, cross-appel-lee.
Rickey McIntyre, Daytona Beach, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Laura Griffin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee, cross-appellant.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The issues raised on appeal are without merit. On the cross-appeal, the primary issue is whether appellant can be convicted of both the sale and possession of a controlled substance when those charges arise from a single drug transaction. The trial court apparently believed he could not be, and deleted the points assessed on the scoresheet for possession, although the conviction for possession was never vacated.
Because the sale and possession in this case occurred on July 1, 1988, the effective date of chapter 88-131, section 7, Laws of Florida, appellant can be separately convicted of both offenses. Davis v. State, 560 So.2d 1231 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). See also State v. Burton, 555 So.2d 1210 (Fla. 1989). Accordingly, we affirm both convictions, but quash the sentence and remand for resentencing in accordance with this opinion.
SENTENCE QUASHED and CAUSE REMANDED.
W. SHARP, GOSHORN and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.
. § 893.13(l)(a)l and 893.13(l)(f), Fla.Stat. ías?).