Case Name: The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Francisco CANO, a/k/a Paco Cano, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1988-07-19
Citations: 529 So. 2d 762
Docket Number: No. 88-294
Parties: The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Francisco CANO, a/k/a Paco Cano, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 529
Pages: 762–763

Head Matter:
The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Francisco CANO, a/k/a Paco Cano, Appellee.
No. 88-294.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 19, 1988.
Rehearing Denied Sept. 2, 1988.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Yvette Rhodes Prescott, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.
John H. Lipinski, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The trial court's sentence outside of the guidelines is reversed because it is not accompanied by the required written statement delineating the reasons for departure. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(b)(6); State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985); Vidal v. State, 516 So.2d 1051 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).
Reversed and remanded.