Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gonzalo MIRAMONTES-FRAUSTO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-01-19
Citations: 166 F. App'x 278
Docket Number: No. 04-50366
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gonzalo MIRAMONTES-FRAUSTO, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: HUG, O’SCANNLAIN, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 166
Pages: 278–279

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gonzalo MIRAMONTES-FRAUSTO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 04-50366.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 9, 2006.
Filed Jan. 19, 2006.
Thomas E. Loeser, Esq., USLA — Office of the U.S. Attorney Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, Denise D. Willett, USR — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Riverside, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
James H. Locklin, Esq., FPDCA — Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: HUG, O’SCANNLAIN, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Gonzalo Miramontes-Frausto appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 70-month sentence for being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Miramontes-Frausto has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Miramontes-Frausto has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Because our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82-83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), indicates that Miramontes-Frausto knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal and was sentenced within the terms of the plea agreement, we enforce the waiver and dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2000) (stating that an appeal waiver is valid when it is entered knowingly and voluntarily); see also United States v. Cardenas, 405 F.3d 1046, 1048 (9th Cir.2005) (noting that the changes in sentencing law imposed by United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), did not render waiver of appeal involuntary and unknowing).
Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the appeal is DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.