Case Name: Maude C. Wetherby and J. L. Wetherby, her husband, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Maurice W. Ashton, Norman A. Hotard and W. C. Chowning, Defendants in Error
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1930-08-06
Citations: 100 Fla. 686
Docket Number: 
Parties: Maude C. Wetherby and J. L. Wetherby, her husband, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Maurice W. Ashton, Norman A. Hotard and W. C. Chowning, Defendants in Error.
Judges: Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield and Buford, J. J., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 100
Pages: 686–686

Head Matter:
Maude C. Wetherby and J. L. Wetherby, her husband, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Maurice W. Ashton, Norman A. Hotard and W. C. Chowning, Defendants in Error.
Special Division A.
Decision filed August 6, 1930.
Horn cfe Ossinsky, for Plaintiffs in Error;
Hull, Landis & Whiteliavr, for Defendants in Error.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.
Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield and Buford, J. J., concur.