Case Name: Ed FINKELSTEIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-03-24
Citations: 91 F. App'x 612
Docket Number: No. 03-56570
Parties: Ed FINKELSTEIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before B. FLETCHER, LEAVY and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 91
Pages: 612–612

Head Matter:
Ed FINKELSTEIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
No. 03-56570.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 15, 2004.
Decided March 24, 2004.
Ed Finkelstein, Tucson, AZ, pro se.
David A. King, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before B. FLETCHER, LEAVY and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Ed Finkelstein appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment which dismissed his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the City of San Diego, alleging that his constitutional rights and state laws were violated when the City did not select his design proposals for a new city library. We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's Order filed on July 30, 2003.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.