Case Name: Donald WHITE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2018-10-30
Citations: 567 S.W.3d 644
Docket Number: No. ED 106267
Parties: Donald WHITE, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 567
Pages: 644–644

Head Matter:
Donald WHITE, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 106267
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Filed: October 30, 2018
Application for Transfer Denied March 5, 2019
FOR APPELLANTS: Kim C. Freter, 225 S. Meramec, Suite 1100, Clayton, Missouri 63105.
FOR RESPONDENTS: Richard A. Starnes, Joshua D. Hawley, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.
Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Donald White appeals the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief based on allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel. He claims that the motion court erred because his trial and appellate counsel were ineffective. We disagree and affirm.
The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).