Case Name: R. V. BARKLEY and C. A. MULLIS v. GEORGE W. PATTERSON and JOSEPH A. ELLIOTT
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 1933-06-14
Citations: 204 N.C. 803
Docket Number: 
Parties: R. V. BARKLEY and C. A. MULLIS v. GEORGE W. PATTERSON and JOSEPH A. ELLIOTT.
Judges: 
Reporter: North Carolina Reports
Volume: 204
Pages: 803–803

Head Matter:
R. V. BARKLEY and C. A. MULLIS v. GEORGE W. PATTERSON and JOSEPH A. ELLIOTT.
(Filed 14 June, 1933.)
Appeal by plaintiffs from Warlick, J., at November Term, 1932, of MecKLENbueg.
Affirmed.
A. A. Tarlton and J. E. Woolard for plaintiffs.
Paul R. Ervin and H. I. McDougle for defendants.

Opinion:
Pee CueiaM.
In this cause a judgment was rendered by a justice of the peace in favor of the plaintiffs and the defendants appealed. The ease was not docketed in the Superior Court, at the term next ensuing the trial and no motion for a recordari was made at that time; but the trial court found as a fact that counsel for the defendants had not been negligent and had been induced to believe that the controversy would be settled without appeal. Upon the findings of fact the court permitted the appeal to be docketed. The plaintiffs excepted and appealed. The judgment is
Affirmed.