Case Name: David TSCHIDA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2006-10-27
Citations: 942 So. 2d 921
Docket Number: No. 2D06-3291
Parties: David TSCHIDA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: WHATLEY, CASANUEVA, and SILBERMAN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 942
Pages: 921–922

Head Matter:
David TSCHIDA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D06-3291.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Oct. 27, 2006.
Rehearing Denied Nov. 30, 2006.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Burrows v. State, 890 So.2d 286 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004), review denied, 914 So.2d 952 (Fla.2005); Caraballo v. State, 805 So.2d 882 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). Contrary to the holding of this court in Burrows, the First District in Isaac v. State, 911 So.2d 813 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005), on collateral review applied the United States Supreme Court decision in Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), retroactively to a sentence that became final before the issuance of the Blakely opinion. As this court did in Hughes v. State, 933 So.2d 1285 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006), we certify direct conflict with Isaac.
Affirmed; conflict certified.
WHATLEY, CASANUEVA, and SILBERMAN, JJ., concur.