Case Name: Brian BUTERA and Robin Butera, Appellant, v. UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY d/b/a Ameren UE, Respondent. and Payne Electric Company, Defendant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-06-29
Citations: 57 S.W.3d 309
Docket Number: No. ED 78827
Parties: Brian BUTERA and Robin Butera, Appellant, v. UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY d/b/a Ameren UE, Respondent. and Payne Electric Company, Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 57
Pages: 309–309

Head Matter:
Brian BUTERA and Robin Butera, Appellant, v. UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY d/b/a Ameren UE, Respondent. and Payne Electric Company, Defendant.
No. ED 78827.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
June 29, 2001.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 4, 2001.
Matthew J. Padberg, Michael P. Corri-gan, The Padberg Law Firm, St. Louis, MO, for appellants.
Ann E. Buckley, Armstrong Teasdale, LLP, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellants, Brian Butera and Robin Butera, brought suit against Union Electric and Payne Electric for damages arising out of injuries sustained to Brian But-era while working as an employee of an independent contractor at Union Electric's Labadie power plant. The trial court awarded summary judgment to Defendants because the accident was covered by worker's compensation.
Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the trial court did not err. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).