Case Name: In the Matter of Janiyah T., an Infant. Administration for Children's Services, Respondent; Lateek C., Appellant, et al., Respondent. (Proceeding No. 1.); In the Matter of Kamiyah C., an Infant. Administration for Children's Services, Respondent; Lateek C., Appellant, et al., Respondent. (Proceeding No. 2.)
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2011-06-21
Citations: 85 A.D.3d 1041
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Janiyah T., an Infant. Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent; Lateek C., Appellant, et al., Respondent. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Kamiyah C., an Infant. Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent; Lateek C., Appellant, et al., Respondent. (Proceeding No. 2.)
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 85
Pages: 1041–1042

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Janiyah T., an Infant. Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent; Lateek C., Appellant, et al., Respondent. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Kamiyah C., an Infant. Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent; Lateek C., Appellant, et al., Respondent. (Proceeding No. 2.)
[925 NYS2d 847]

Opinion:
In two related proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, Lateek C. appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Olshansky, J.), dated July 28, 2010, as, after a hearing, only awarded him supervised visitation with Kamiyah C.
Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.