Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lamont David SMITH, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-10-14
Citations: 333 F. App'x 730
Docket Number: No. 09-7416
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Lamont David SMITH, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 333
Pages: 730–730

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Lamont David SMITH, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 09-7416.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 1, 2009.
Decided: Oct. 14, 2009.
Lamont David Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Hugh McWilliams, Jr., John Castle Parr, Assistant United States Attorneys, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Lamont David Smith appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Smith, No. 1:95-cr-00036-FPS-JSK-1 (N.D.W.Va. July 21, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.