Case Name: Jarrod L. GILL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-12-18
Citations: 388 S.W.3d 598
Docket Number: No. ED 98291
Parties: Jarrod L. GILL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 388
Pages: 598–599

Head Matter:
Jarrod L. GILL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 98291.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Dec. 18, 2012.
Timothy J. Forneris, St. Louis, MO, for movant/appellant.
Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent/respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Jarrod L. Gill appeals from the judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.085 without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k); Nesbitt v. State, 335 S.W.3d 67, 69 (Mo.App. E.D.2011). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2011, unless otherwise indicated.