Case Name: TOWNSHIP OF CRANBURY, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY BOARD OF TAXATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1985-07-31
Citations: 7 N.J. Tax 667
Docket Number: 
Parties: TOWNSHIP OF CRANBURY, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY BOARD OF TAXATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Tax Court Reports
Volume: 7
Pages: 667–668

Head Matter:
TOWNSHIP OF CRANBURY, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY BOARD OF TAXATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Submitted April 17, 1985
Decided July 31, 1985.
Before Judges FRITZ, GAULKIN and LONG.
Huff, Moran & Balint, attorneys for appellant (William C. Moran, Jr., of counsel and on the brief).
Irwin I. Kimmelman, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney for respondent {James J. Ciancia, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Harry Haushalter, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm, substantially for the reasons set forth by Judge Andrew in his opinion in the Tax Court, 6 N.J.Tax 501 (Tax Ct.1984).