Case Name: State of Connecticut v. Omar Bahamonde
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1990-02-15
Citations: 21 Conn. App. 801
Docket Number: 7406
Parties: State of Connecticut v. Omar Bahamonde
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Appellate Reports
Volume: 21
Pages: 801–801

Head Matter:
State of Connecticut v. Omar Bahamonde
(7406)
Borden, Daly and Foti, Js.
Argued February 6
decision released February 15, 1990
Burton M. Weinstein, for the appellant (defendant).
Frederick W. Fawcett, assistant state’s attorney, with whom, on the brief, were Donald A. Browne, state’s attorney, and Henry Lyons, assistant state’s attorney, for the appellee (state).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of manslaughter in the first degree with a firearm in violation of General Statutes § BSa-ñBa. He claims that the trial court erred (1) in its instruction to the jury after a report of deadlock, (2) in its instructions on reasonable doubt, and (3) in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal.
After a plenary review of the record, transcripts and briefs, and after affording each claim of error the appropriate scope of review, we conclude that all claims are without merit. Schiavone v. Schiavone, 18 Conn. App. 825, 559 A.2d 1192 (1989).
There is no error.
The defendant was charged with the crime of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a (a), but was found guilty of the lesser included offense.