Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Brian Rhett MARTIN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-08-23
Citations: 145 F. App'x 958
Docket Number: No. 03-20496
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Brian Rhett MARTIN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before HIGGINBOTHAM, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 145
Pages: 958–958

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Brian Rhett MARTIN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 03-20496.
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Decided Aug. 23, 2005.
James Lee Turner, Kathlyn Giannaula Snyder, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Roland E. Dahlin, II, Federal Public Defender, Timothy William Crooks, Richard 0. Ely, Assistant Federal Public Defenders, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
PER CURIAM:
The district court revoked Brian Rhett Martin's supervised release term and sentenced him to eighteen months of imprisonment to be followed by an eighteen-month term of supervised release. We affirmed. See United States v. Martin, 87 Fed. Appx. 392 (5th Cir. Feb.18, 2004). On January 24, 2005, the Supreme Court vacated our judgment and remanded to us for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). See Newsome v. United States, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 1112, 160 L.Ed.2d 989 (2005) (consolidated petition including Martin). Martin does not now press a Booker claim, conceding that Booker has no impact on this appeal.
We reinstate our prior judgment affirming Martin's sentence.
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.