Case Name: Bradford, Appellant, v. Moore, Warden, Appellee
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2000-09-20
Citations: 90 Ohio St. 3d 75
Docket Number: No. 00-715
Parties: Bradford, Appellant, v. Moore, Warden, Appellee.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 90
Pages: 75–75

Head Matter:
Bradford, Appellant, v. Moore, Warden, Appellee.
[Cite as Bradford v. Moore (2000), 90 Ohio St.3d 75.]
(No. 00-715
Submitted August 22, 2000
Decided September 20, 2000.)
Derrick A. Bradford, pro se.
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Diane Mallory, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals because a "claimed violation of R.C. 2945.05 is not the proper subject for habeas corpus relief and may be remedied only in a direct appeal from a criminal conviction." State ex rel. Earl v. Mitchell (1999), 87 Ohio St.3d 259, 260, 719 N.E.2d 545, 546; State v. Pless (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 333, 658 N.E.2d 766, paragraph two of the syllabus.
Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.