Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. James Brian DANIELS, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-10-20
Citations: 980 S.W.2d 119
Docket Number: No. 73031
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. James Brian DANIELS, Appellant.
Judges: Before JAMES R. DOWD, P.J., and CRAHAN and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 980
Pages: 119–119

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. James Brian DANIELS, Appellant.
No. 73031.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Oct. 20, 1998.
Susan McGraugh, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Kenneth P. Ferguson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before JAMES R. DOWD, P.J., and CRAHAN and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
James Brian Daniels appeals the judgment entered upon his conviction after a jury trial of robbery in the first degree, Section 569.020, RSMo (1994), armed criminal action, Section 571.015 RSMo (1994), burglary in the first degree, Section 569.160 RSMo (1994), and sexual abuse, Section 566.100, RSMo (1994). On appeal, Daniels argues that the trial court erred in overruling his Batson challenge to the State's use of a peremptory strike to remove an African-American veni-reperson from the jury.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. Judgement affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).