Case Name: HARVEY WYNCOOP v. STATE
Court: Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1918-11-23
Citations: 15 Okla. Crim. 670
Docket Number: No. A-3071
Parties: HARVEY WYNCOOP v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: Oklahoma Criminal Reports
Volume: 15
Pages: 670–670

Head Matter:
HARVEY WYNCOOP v. STATE.
No. A-3071.
Opinion filed November 23, 1918.
Appeal from County Court, Oklahoma County; William H. Zwick, Judge. ■
Harvey Wyneoop was convicted of violation of the prohibitory-liquor laws, and appeals.
Affirmed.
Ruth & Tripp, for plaintiff in error. .
S. P. Freeling, Atty. Gen., and R. McMillan, Asst. Átty. Gen., for file State.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Harvey Wyneoop- was convicted in the county court of.Oklahoma county of the crime of unlawfully conveying five half-pint, bqttles of liquor .from near the corner of California avenue, apd .Walker street to a point on south Hudson street in the city of, Oklahoma .City,-his punishment being fixed at a fine of if 100 and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of 60 days.
The evidence showed that the defendant was seen to walx from' a point on California ave ue neir Walker sveet in Oklahoma City to • a point on south Hudson street between Grand and California avenue, at which 'atier pl,u e he was intercepted and a1 rested Five half-pints of whisky were found concealed upon his person in five different pockets of his clothing. No defense was interposed in behalf of the defendant
The grounds relied upon for a reversal are purely technical and without substantial merit. The attorneys who represent the plaintiff in error in this court did not defend him in the .lower court.
After a careful consideration of the grounds urged for reversal, it is the opinion of this court that the guilt of the defendant is established beyond question of a doubt, and that there is no -merit in the contentions urged for reversal.
The judgment of conviction is accordingly affirmed.