Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Damian Poinsett, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2003-11-24
Citations: 1 A.D.2d 615
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Damian Poinsett, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 1
Pages: 615–616

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Damian Poinsett, Appellant.
[767 NYS2d 661]

Opinion:
Appeal by the de fendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Rockland County (Nelson, J.), imposed January 19, 2001, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
Since the defendant pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would receive the sentence which was thereafter actually imposed, he has no basis to now complain that his sentence was excessive (see People v Williams, 306 AD2d 544 [2003]; People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816 [1984]). In any event, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Santucci, J.E, McGinity, Schmidt and Adams, JJ., concur.