Case Name: Peter DEACON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PANDORA MEDIA, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-07-21
Citations: 655 F. App'x 581
Docket Number: No. 12-17734
Parties: Peter DEACON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PANDORA MEDIA, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before: SCHROEDER, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges, and BUCK, District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 655
Pages: 581–582

Head Matter:
Peter DEACON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PANDORA MEDIA, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 12-17734
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted February 11, 2015 San Francisco, California
Filed July 21, 2016
Ari Jonathan Scharg, Attorney, Ryan D. Andrews, Jay Edelson, James Dominick Larry, Edelson P.C., Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellant
Michele D. Floyd, Esquire, Attorney, Shcks, Ricketts & Case LLP, San Francisco, CA, Jacob A. Sommer, Attorney, Marc Zwillinger, Attorney, ZwillGen PLLC, Washington, DC,' for Defendant-Appellee
Before: SCHROEDER, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges, and BUCK, District Judge.
The Honorable Paul C. Huck, United States District Judge for the U.S. District Court for Southern Florida, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
ORDER
On February 24, 2015, we certified a question to the Michigan Supreme Court, which it modified and answered on July 6, 2016.
In view of the Court's answer, which dispositively resolves-this case, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provid ed by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.