Case Name: In re Dennis L. LAND and Carla M. Land, Debtors. Dennis L. LAND and Carla M. Land, Plaintiffs, v. Virgil STONESTREET; Elsie Stonestreet; Galen Stehlik; Kermit Jones; William Norton; United States of America; acting through Commodity Credit Corporation; Bruce Bartu; United States of America, acting through Farmers Home Administration; and Timothy Mahoney, Defendants
Court: United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nebraska
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1988-06-13
Citations: 86 B.R. 625
Docket Number: Bankruptcy No. 85-00868; Adv. No. A88-4025
Parties: In re Dennis L. LAND and Carla M. Land, Debtors. Dennis L. LAND and Carla M. Land, Plaintiffs, v. Virgil STONESTREET; Elsie Stonestreet; Galen Stehlik; Kermit Jones; William Norton; United States of America; acting through Commodity Credit Corporation; Bruce Bartu; United States of America, acting through Farmers Home Administration; and Timothy Mahoney, Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Bankruptcy Reporter
Volume: 86
Pages: 625–625

Head Matter:
In re Dennis L. LAND and Carla M. Land, Debtors. Dennis L. LAND and Carla M. Land, Plaintiffs, v. Virgil STONESTREET; Elsie Stonestreet; Galen Stehlik; Kermit Jones; William Norton; United States of America; acting through Commodity Credit Corporation; Bruce Bartu; United States of America, acting through Farmers Home Administration; and Timothy Mahoney, Defendants.
Bankruptcy No. 85-00868.
Adv. No. A88-4025.
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nebraska.
June 13, 1988.
Susan Knight, Lincoln, Neb., for

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JOHN C. MINAHAN, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.
The defendant, Timothy J. Mahoney, has moved to dismiss under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(5) & (6), and also on the theory of immunity. The motion is accompanied by an affidavit. When matters outside the pleadings are presented on a motion to dismiss, and the motion is treated as a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56, "all parties shall be given reasonable opportunity to present all material made pertinent to such motion by Rule 56." Court v. Hall County, 725 F.2d 1170, 1172 (8th Cir.1984). The motion is hereby taken under advisement to be determined by the Court after plaintiffs have been provided an opportunity to respond.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the defendant's motion to dismiss (Fil. # 24), will be treated as a motion for summary judgment and the plaintiffs will be given until June 27, 1988, to present evidence in the form of an affidavit in compliance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e).