Case Name: James W. LEWIS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2018-03-06
Citations: 540 S.W.3d 888
Docket Number: ED 105167
Parties: James W. LEWIS, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 540
Pages: 888–889

Head Matter:
James W. LEWIS, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
ED 105167
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Filed: March 6, 2018
Annette M. Wallace, 920 Main Street, Suite 500, Kansas City, MO 64105, For Movant/Appellant.
Evan J. Buchheim, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent/Respondent.
Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
James W. Lewis appeals from the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k); Burston v. State, 343 S.W.3d 691, 693 (Mo. App. E.D. 2011). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the decision pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. 2016, unless otherwise indicated.