Case Name: STELZENMULLER, Respondent, v. SEE-SAW PLEASURE RY. CO., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1908-12-30
Citations: 114 N.Y.S. 1148
Docket Number: 
Parties: STELZENMULLER, Respondent, v. SEE-SAW PLEASURE RY. CO., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 114
Pages: 1148–1148

Head Matter:
STELZENMULLER, Respondent, v. SEE-SAW PLEASURE RY. CO., Appellant.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
December 30, 1908.)
Action by Karl Stelzenmuller against the See-Saw Pleasure Railway Company.

Opinion:
No opinion. Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed, and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, on the ground that the question whether the plaintiff had broken the contract, and thereby justified his discharge, should have been submitted to the jury.