Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Lamont SLATE, a/k/a Chicago, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-04-29
Citations: 569 F. App'x 164
Docket Number: No. 14-6273
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Lamont SLATE, a/k/a Chicago, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 569
Pages: 164–164

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Lamont SLATE, a/k/a Chicago, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 14-6273.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 24, 2014.
Decided: April 29, 2014.
William Lamont Slate, Appellant Pro Se.
Peter Sinclair Duffey, Stephen David Schiller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
William Lamont Slate appeals a district court order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(B) (2012) motion and his petition for a writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and the district court's order and affirm for the reasons of the district court. United States v. Slate, No. 4:97-cr-00041-RBS-2 (E.D.Va. Feb. 5, 2014). We deny Slate's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.