Case Name: Jarvis HAYNES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2013-08-30
Citations: 121 So. 3d 1133
Docket Number: No. 5D13-1391
Parties: Jarvis HAYNES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SAWAYA, ORFINGER and LAWSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 121
Pages: 1133–1133

Head Matter:
Jarvis HAYNES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D13-1391.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Aug. 30, 2013.
Rehearing Denied Sept. 26, 2013.
Jarvis Ramon Haynes, Clermont, pro se, Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Wright v. State, 857 So.2d 861, 874 (Fla.2003) ("Habeas corpus should not be used as a vehicle for presenting issues which should have been raised at trial and on appeal or in postcon-viction proceedings."); see also McCloud v. State, 335 So.2d 257, 259 (Fla.1976) (holding that where defendant charged with felony murder — with robbery as the underlying felony — was found guilty of the lesser included offense of manslaughter, but also separately found guilty of robbery, "that fact does not lead to a conclusion that the robbery sentence must be vacated . [because] the jury simply may have found the felony-murder rule too harsh in this situation [and exercised its jury pardon power].") Gonzalez v. State, 449 So.2d 882, 887-89 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984) (same); also cf. Dross v. State, 915 So.2d 203 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (citing McCloud and holding that a verdict of acquittal on a charge of felony murder, with aggravated child abuse as the underlying felony, was not truly inconsistent with the jury's conviction on the separate count charging aggravated child abuse).
SAWAYA, ORFINGER and LAWSON, JJ., concur.