Case Name: Joseph MATHOS, et al., Appellants, v. The SCHOOL BOARD OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2003-12-17
Citations: 861 So. 2d 520
Docket Number: No. 3D03-1188
Parties: Joseph MATHOS, et al., Appellants, v. The SCHOOL BOARD OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and LEVY and SHEVIN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 861
Pages: 520–520

Head Matter:
Joseph MATHOS, et al., Appellants, v. The SCHOOL BOARD OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D03-1188.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 17, 2003.
Slesniek & Casey and James C. Casey, Coral Gables, for appellants.
Ana I. Segura, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and LEVY and SHEVIN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Because the appellants had no cognizable, substantial rights in the particular positions in which they were employed by the School Board, the Board properly denied their section 120.57, Florida Statutes (2001), request for hearing challenging their reassignments to other executive positions. See Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 92 S.Ct. 2701, 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); City of Lauderhill v. Rhames, 864 So.2d 432 (Fla. 4th DCA Case no. 4D02-101, opinion filed, October 22, 2003); Muncy v. City of Dallas, 335 F.3d 394 (5th Cir.2003).
Affirmed.