Case Name: LONDON AND SCOTTISH ASSURANCE CORPORATION, Ltd., et al. v. CALIFORNIA-OREGON POWER COMPANY
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1924-09-23
Citations: 114 Or. 21
Docket Number: 
Parties: LONDON AND SCOTTISH ASSURANCE CORPORATION, Ltd., et al. v. CALIFORNIA-OREGON POWER COMPANY.
Judges: Bean, J., dissents, and adheres to the former opinion.
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 114
Pages: 21–22

Head Matter:
Argued on rehearing July 29,
affirmed on rehearing September 23, 1924,
appellants’ petition for rehearing denied and costs taxed March 17, mandate issued March 29, 1925.
LONDON AND SCOTTISH ASSURANCE CORPORATION, Ltd., et al. v. CALIFORNIA-OREGON POWER COMPANY.
(228 Pac. 1095.)
For appellants there was a brief over the names of Messrs. Miller, Thornton £ Miller, Messrs. Penning, Manning £ Oanong and Messrs. McCamant £ Thompson, with oral arguments by Mr. Wallace McCamant and Mr. E. B. M. Miller.
For respondent there was a brief over the names of Messrs. Morrison, Dunne £ Brobeck, Mr. A. E. Reames, Mr. R. G. Croesbeck, and Mr. D. V. Kuykendall, with an oral argument by Mr. Peter E. Dunne.

Opinion:
BURNETT, J.
— This case is a companion to Kesterson v. California-Oregon Power Co., supra, p. 22 (228 Pac. 1092), and arises out of the same fire and depends upon the same principles. The demurrer to the complaint was sustained by the Circuit Court and the cause dismissed, from which decision the plaintiffs appealed. Depending as it does upon the same principles elaborated in the Kesterson case, the same conclusion is inevitable and the judgment should be affirmed.
It is so ordered.
Aeeirmed. Rehearing Denied.
Bean, J., dissents, and adheres to the former opinion.