Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Miguel Angel ALFONSO-PEREZ, also known as Miguel Angel Alfonso, also known as Miguel Alfonso Perez, also known as Miguel Angel Perez Alfonso, also known as Miguel Angel Perez, also known as Miguel Angel Alfonso Perez, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-06-22
Citations: 384 F. App'x 322
Docket Number: No. 09-20568
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Miguel Angel ALFONSO-PEREZ, also known as Miguel Angel Alfonso, also known as Miguel Alfonso Perez, also known as Miguel Angel Perez Alfonso, also known as Miguel Angel Perez, also known as Miguel Angel Alfonso Perez, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 384
Pages: 322–322

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Miguel Angel ALFONSO-PEREZ, also known as Miguel Angel Alfonso, also known as Miguel Alfonso Perez, also known as Miguel Angel Perez Alfonso, also known as Miguel Angel Perez, also known as Miguel Angel Alfonso Perez, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-20568
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
June 22, 2010.
James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Sarah Beth Landau, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Miguel Angel Alfonso-Perez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Alfonso-Perez has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel's brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.