Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ron AMIRAN, aka Ronen Amiran, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-06-04
Citations: 281 F. App'x 692
Docket Number: No. 07-56248
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ron AMIRAN, aka Ronen Amiran, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before: WARDLAW and IKUTA, Circuit Judges, and FOGEL, District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 281
Pages: 692–693

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ron AMIRAN, aka Ronen Amiran, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 07-56248.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 5, 2008.
Filed June 4, 2008.
Steven M. Arkow, Michael J. Raphael, Esq., Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Marcia J. Brewer, Law Offices of Marcia J. Brewer, Culver City, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before: WARDLAW and IKUTA, Circuit Judges, and FOGEL, District Judge.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision for without oral argument. See. Fed. R.App. 34(a)(2)
The Honorable Jeremy Fogel, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
The district court granted Amiran's petition for a writ of error coram nobis on the ground that Amiran was not advised of the immigration consequences of his guilty plea. One of the requirements for coram nobis relief is that the underlying conviction be the result of a fundamental error. Hirabayashi v. United States, 828 F.2d 591, 604 (9th Cir.1987). We have held expressly that failure to advise a defendant of the immigration consequences of his plea is not such a fundamental error. United States v. Amador-Leal, 276 F.3d 511, 517 (9th Cir.2002); see also Fruchtman v. Kenton, 531 F.2d 946, 949 (9th Cir.1976).
Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and the case remanded to the district court with instructions to deny the petition.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited by or to the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.