Case Name: Daryl LYONS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant, and McKesson; MARTINEZ; Rasco; Duncan; Nikesson, Defendants - Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-02-20
Citations: 56 F. App'x 407
Docket Number: No. 02-15458; D.C. No. CV-00-05169-AWI
Parties: Daryl LYONS, Plaintiff — Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant, and McKesson; MARTINEZ; Rasco; Duncan; Nikesson, Defendants — Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 56
Pages: 407–408

Head Matter:
Daryl LYONS, Plaintiff — Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant, and McKesson; MARTINEZ; Rasco; Duncan; Nikesson, Defendants — Appellees.
No. 02-15458.
D.C. No. CV-00-05169-AWI.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 10, 2003.
Decided Feb. 20, 2003.
Before LEAVY, FERNANDEZ and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, Lyons’ motion for oral argument is denied.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Daryl Lyons, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's judgment dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Barnett v. Centoni 31 F.3d 813, 816 (9th Cir.1994) (per curiam), and we affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Lyons' action because it was clear from the face of the amended complaint and objections to the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations, that Lyons failed to exhaust available prison administrative remedies before filing suit in federal court. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997(e)(a); McKinney v. Carey, 311 F.3d 1198, 1199, 1200 (9th Cir. 2002) (per curiam) (requiring prisoners to exhaust prison grievance procedures before, not after, filing suit in federal court).
Lyons' remaining contentions also lack merit.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.