Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven Ray JOHNSON, a/k/a Quick, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-09-15
Citations: 332 F. App'x 158
Docket Number: No. 09-6962
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven Ray JOHNSON, a/k/a Quick, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 332
Pages: 158–158

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven Ray JOHNSON, a/k/a Quick, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-6962.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 10, 2009.
Decided: Sept. 15, 2009.
Steven Ray Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Steven Johnson appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Johnson, No. 5:96-cr-00157-H-8 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 27, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.