Case Name: David DAVISON v. The Honorable Andre McNEIL Chancery Judge, Searcy County, Arkansas, 20th Judicial District
Court: Arkansas Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Arkansas
Decision Date: 1991-03-11
Citations: 305 Ark. 18
Docket Number: 90-280
Parties: David DAVISON v. The Honorable Andre McNEIL Chancery Judge, Searcy County, Arkansas, 20th Judicial District
Judges: 
Reporter: Arkansas Reports
Volume: 305
Pages: 18–19

Head Matter:
David DAVISON v. The Honorable Andre McNEIL Chancery Judge, Searcy County, Arkansas, 20th Judicial District
90-280
804 S.W.2d 369
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Opinion delivered March 11, 1991.
David Davison, pro se.
Karen J. Swogger, for appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
On February 7,1991, David Davison filed an amended petition for a writ of prohibition to the Searcy Chancery Court enjoining that court from proceeding with a February 7, 1991, hearing. The petition alleges that this court had previously prohibited the chancellor from hearing a case styled Marilyn Davison (now Mason) v. David Davison as long as the case was removed to the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas. The amended petition alleged that the respondent chancery judge of Searcy County was proceeding irrespective of the temporary stay issued by this Court.
Exhibits to the response of Marilyn Davison Mason, filed February 19, 1991, reflect that by order of July 27, 1990, the United States District Court remanded the case to state court upon the failure of David Davison to amend his notice of removal within the eleven days allowed, noting that he failed to supply information as to whether the removal to federal court was timely. On August 28, 1990, a motion for reconsideration by David Davison was denied and on February 11,1991, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit dismissed Davison's appeal as frivolous.
For the reasons stated, the amended petition for writ of prohibition and emergency Motion for Contempt are denied as moot and the temporary writ of prohibition is dissolved. Respondent's prayer for sanctions pursuant to A.R.C.P. Rule 11 is denied.