Case Name: Joe HART, Appellant, v. Roy F. FRANCE, Sr., trading and doing business as Roy F. France, and Son, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1963-10-08
Citations: 156 So. 2d 775
Docket Number: No. 63-109
Parties: Joe HART, Appellant, v. Roy F. FRANCE, Sr., trading and doing business as Roy F. France, and Son, Appellee.
Judges: Before HORTON, TILLMAN PEARSON, and HENDRY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 156
Pages: 775–775

Head Matter:
Joe HART, Appellant, v. Roy F. FRANCE, Sr., trading and doing business as Roy F. France, and Son, Appellee.
No. 63-109.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
Oct. 8, 1963.
Rehearing Denied Oct. 29, 1963.
Edith Held Cooper, Miami Beach, Joseph A. Perkins, Miami, for appellant.
Robert C. Lane, Miami, for appellee.
Before HORTON, TILLMAN PEARSON, and HENDRY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The defendant to an action for services rendered has appealed a final judgment for the plaintiff based on a jury verdict. Appellant's main argument is that the evidence does not support the verdict. We have reviewed the evidence, together with the various rulings of the court assigned as error, and we hold that the judgment must be affirmed upon the rule stated in Western Union Tel. Co. v. Thomas, 139 Fla. 474, 190 So. 878.
Affirmed.