Case Name: SOFRANSKI BROS., INC., v. H. C. F. KOCH & CO.
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1914-05-07
Citations: 147 N.Y.S. 1142
Docket Number: 
Parties: SOFRANSKI BROS., INC., v. H. C. F. KOCH & CO.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 147
Pages: 1142–1143

Head Matter:
SOFRANSKI BROS., INC., v. H. C. F. KOCH & CO.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.
May 7, 1914.)
Ap peal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Seventh District. Action by Sofranski Bros, against H. O. F. Koch & Co. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.
Reversed, and new trial ordered.
Myers & Goldsmith, of New York City (Emanuel J. Myers, of New York City, and Josiah Cantor, of counsel), for appellants.
Max Salomon, of New York City, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The defendants' witness, Miss Edwards, should have been permitted to testify fully as to conversations had by her with the plaintiff concerning the delivery of the goods to defendants and the sending of them to defendants, and after her memory had been •exhausted as to the general conversations it was proper to call witness' attention to particular things that were said. The exclusion of this evidence "was error. Judgment reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.