Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Naarl Joseph RICHARD, a/k/a Noel H. Richard, a/k/a Richard Earl, a/k/a Richard Narrl, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-06-29
Citations: 667 F. App'x 73
Docket Number: No. 16-6232
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Naarl Joseph RICHARD, a/k/a Noel H. Richard, a/k/a Richard Earl, a/k/a Richard Narrl, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 667
Pages: 73–73

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Naarl Joseph RICHARD, a/k/a Noel H. Richard, a/k/a Richard Earl, a/k/a Richard Narrl, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-6232
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 23, 2016
Decided: June 29, 2016
Naarl Joseph Richard, Appellant Pro Se. Nathan S. Williams, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Naarl Joseph Richard appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Richard, No. 2:09-cr-00992-PMD-1 (D.S.C. Jan. 29, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED