Case Name: A.T.T., a minor, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Peter Gilcrest; Nathaniel P. Proctor; Yvonne Mims-Evans; Thomas C. Porter; Helms, Mullis & Wicker PLLC, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-12-09
Citations: 302 F. App'x 228
Docket Number: No. 08-1724
Parties: A.T.T., a minor, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Peter Gilcrest; Nathaniel P. Proctor; Yvonne Mims-Evans; Thomas C. Porter; Helms, Mullis & Wicker PLLC, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 302
Pages: 228–229

Head Matter:
A.T.T., a minor, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Peter Gilcrest; Nathaniel P. Proctor; Yvonne Mims-Evans; Thomas C. Porter; Helms, Mullis & Wicker PLLC, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 08-1724.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 10, 2008.
Decided: Dec. 9, 2008.
A.T.T., a minor, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
A.T.T., a minor, appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. A.T.T. v. United States, No. 3:08-cv-00192-FDW, 2008 WL 1944172 (W.D.N.C. May 1, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.