Case Name: STAFFORD JONES, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. BAYONNE BARREL & DRUM CO., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1964-10-19
Citations: 43 N.J. 279
Docket Number: 
Parties: STAFFORD JONES, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. BAYONNE BARREL & DRUM CO., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Judges: For affirmance —■ Chief Justice WeiNTRaub, and Justices Jaoobs, FRANCIS, Prootor, Haul, Sohettino and HaNe-MAN — 7.
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 43
Pages: 279–280

Head Matter:
STAFFORD JONES, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. BAYONNE BARREL & DRUM CO., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Argued September 22, 1964
Decided October 19, 1964.
Mr. Isidor Ealisch argued the cause for appellant.
Mr. Olive 8. Gummis argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Harvey A. Lieb, attorney).

Opinion:
The opinion of the court was delivered
Pee CueiaM.
This is a workmen's compensation case which came to us as of right because of a dissent in the Appellate Division. R. R. 1:2-l (b). The Division of Workmen's Compensation, the county court, and the majority of the Appellate Division found for petitioner, albeit their factual theses were not concordant. We are not persuaded to disturb the judgment. It is accordingly affirmed.
For affirmance — Chief Justice WeiNTRaub, and Justices Jaoobs, FRANCIS, Prootor, Haul, Sohettino and HaNe-MAN — 7.
For reversal — None.