Case Name: Vicky HARDY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ernest R. SUTTON, Superintendent at Pasquotank Correctional Center; Ms. Vankeuren, Medical Services at Pasquotank Correctional Center, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-06-11
Citations: 247 F. App'x 411
Docket Number: No. 06-7701
Parties: Vicky HARDY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ernest R. SUTTON, Superintendent at Pasquotank Correctional Center; Ms. Vankeuren, Medical Services at Pasquotank Correctional Center, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 247
Pages: 411–412

Head Matter:
Vicky HARDY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ernest R. SUTTON, Superintendent at Pasquotank Correctional Center; Ms. Vankeuren, Medical Services at Pasquotank Correctional Center, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 06-7701.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 31, 2007.
Decided: June 11, 2007.
Vicky Hardy, Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Bulluck Ricci, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Vicky Hardy appeals the district court's order dismissing Hardy's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. While the district court may have erred in dismissing the complaint for failure to exhaust under the Supreme Court's recent decision in Jones v. Bock, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 910, 166 L.Ed.2d 798 (2007), we affirm the district court's order on the modified ground that Hardy cannot proceed on claims based upon respondeat superior and supervisory liability. See Shaw v. Stroud, 13 F.3d 791, 799 (4th Cir.1994); Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 850 (4th Cir.1985). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.