Case Name: Rhyissa Van Raas, Respondent, v. Rosenbaum-Grinell, Inc., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1960-02-04
Citations: 23 Misc. 2d 919
Docket Number: 
Parties: Rhyissa Van Raas, Respondent, v. Rosenbaum-Grinell, Inc., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 23
Pages: 919–919

Head Matter:
Rhyissa Van Raas, Respondent, v. Rosenbaum-Grinell, Inc., Appellant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
February 4, 1960.
Simon S. Katz for appellant. Monroe J. Winsten and Albert A. Jurón for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Plaintiff was not entitled to recover the item of $37.50 for advertising costs for a new position, since, in any event, same might have been incurred in advertising for a new position when her employment terminated at the end of the stated season, in December.
The judgment should be modified by reducing the recovery to the sum of $780, with interest and costs thereon and as modified affirmed, with $25 costs to plaintiff-respondent.
Concur — Hecht, J. P., Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ.
Judgment modified, etc.