Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dana Amile CAPEHART, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-09-10
Citations: 394 F. App'x 980
Docket Number: No. 10-6399
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Dana Amile CAPEHART, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 394
Pages: 980–980

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Dana Amile CAPEHART, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 10-6399.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 16, 2010.
Decided: Sept. 10, 2010.
Dana Amile Capehart, Appellant Pro Se. Sherrie Scott Capotosto, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Ap-pellee.
Before NIEMEYER and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Dana Amile Capehart appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Capehart, No. 2:06-cr-00113-RAJ-FBS-1 (E.D.Va. Feb. 26, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.