Case Name: Bruce PATRICK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-03-28
Citations: 576 So. 2d 935
Docket Number: No. 90-1748
Parties: Bruce PATRICK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: W. SHARP, GRIFFIN and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 576
Pages: 935–935

Head Matter:
Bruce PATRICK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 90-1748.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
March 28, 1991.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Brynn Newton, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and David S. Morgan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm on authority of Walker v. State, 546 So.2d 764 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989) and certify the same question we certified in Flowers v. State, 567 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990):
DO FLORIDA'S UNIFORM SENTENCING GUIDELINES REQUIRE THAT LEGAL CONSTRAINT POINTS BE ASSESSED FOR EACH OFFENSE COMMITTED WHILE UNDER LEGAL CONSTRAINT?
W. SHARP, GRIFFIN and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.