Case Name: Harold Marvin WATSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1976-02-25
Citations: 327 So. 2d 112
Docket Number: No. Y-237
Parties: Harold Marvin WATSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: BOYER, C. J., and RAWLS and Mc-CORD, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 327
Pages: 112–112

Head Matter:
Harold Marvin WATSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. Y-237.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Feb. 25, 1976.
Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, and David J. Busch, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Carolyn M. Snurkowski, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have carefully read the record and briefs. It is well settled that normally an appellate court must confine itself to a review of only those questions which were before the trial court and upon which a ruling adverse to the appealing party was made. (State v. Barber, Sup.Ct.Fla.1974, 301 So.2d 7) Appellant's counsel, the public defender, has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We have accordingly searched the record to discover any fundamental error and find none. (Please see 28 C.J.S.Supp. Drugs and Narcotics § 208, p. 307, and United States v. Graham, 5th Cir. 1972, 464 F.2d 1073, cert. den. 409 U.S. 987, 93 S.Ct. 341, 34 L.Ed.2d 252 (1973)).
Affirmed.
BOYER, C. J., and RAWLS and Mc-CORD, JJ., concur.