Case Name: Harriston BECK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-09-18
Citations: 380 S.W.3d 614
Docket Number: No. ED 97816
Parties: Harriston BECK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON,-J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 380
Pages: 614–614

Head Matter:
Harriston BECK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 97816.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Sept. 18, 2012.
Timothy Forneris, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., John Winston Grantham, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON,-J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Harriston Beck ("Movant") appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).