Case Name: ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INS. COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. Mrs. W. E. EARNEST et al., Defendants in Error
Court: Supreme Court of Texas
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1927-06-04
Citations: 296 S.W. 1088
Docket Number: No. 15329
Parties: ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INS. COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. Mrs. W. E. EARNEST et al., Defendants in Error.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 296
Pages: 1088–1088

Head Matter:
ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INS. COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. Mrs. W. E. EARNEST et al., Defendants in Error.
(No. 15329.)
Supreme Court of Texas.
June 4, 1927.
E. U. Senter, of Dallas, and Bledsoe & Cren-shaw, of Lubbock, for plaintiff in error.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We think the decision of the Court of Civil Appeals (293 S. W. 677) was correct, because the motion filed in the trial court was manifestly insufficient to warrant the vacation of the judgment by default.
We are not prepared to concur in the holdings of the Court of Civil Appeals on the questions of practice discussed in the opinion.