Case Name: A. FISHMAN HAT COMPANY, INCORPORATED, APPELLANT, v. JACOB ROSEN ET AL., RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1929-05-20
Citations: 106 N.J.L. 567
Docket Number: 
Parties: A. FISHMAN HAT COMPANY, INCORPORATED, APPELLANT, v. JACOB ROSEN ET AL., RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 106
Pages: 567–567

Head Matter:
A. FISHMAN HAT COMPANY, INCORPORATED, APPELLANT, v. JACOB ROSEN ET AL., RESPONDENT.
Submitted October 26, 1928
Decided May 20, 1929.
Eor the appellant, Emil Neblo.
For the respondents, Kraemer & Siegler.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Trenchaed, Parker, Kalisch, Lloyd, White, Yan Buskiric, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 12.
For reversal — Hone.