Case Name: Deborah A. MULLINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MAYOR and CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE CITY; Charles Krysiak, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-03-03
Citations: 368 F. App'x 369
Docket Number: No. 09-1195
Parties: Deborah A. MULLINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MAYOR and CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE CITY; Charles Krysiak, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 368
Pages: 369–370

Head Matter:
Deborah A. MULLINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MAYOR and CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE CITY; Charles Krysiak, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 09-1195.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 11, 2010.
Decided: March 3, 2010.
John B. Stolarz, The Stolarz Law Firm, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. George A. Nilson, City Solicitor, Gary Gil-key, Chief Solicitor, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Deborah Mullins appeals the district court's orders denying her motion for leave to amend the complaint and granting the Appellees' motion for summary judgment on Mullins' claims of gender discrimination, First Amendment retaliation, and tortious interference with contract and economic relations. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Ac cordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mullins v. Mayor and City of Baltimore, No. 1:07-cv-02454-CCB, 2009 WL 248043 (D.Md. Jan. 20, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.