Case Name: Rufus MILLER, Appellant, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-02-12
Citations: 613 So. 2d 604
Docket Number: No. 91-3157
Parties: Rufus MILLER, Appellant, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, Appellee.
Judges: ERVIN, BOOTH and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 613
Pages: 604–605

Head Matter:
Rufus MILLER, Appellant, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, Appellee.
No. 91-3157.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Feb. 12, 1993.
Rufus Miller, pro se.
Kurt E. Ahrendt, Asst. General Counsel, Florida Parole Com’n, Tallahassee, for ap-pellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court's denial of appellant's petition for writ of mandamus. We do not reach any of the issues presented in appellant's brief, because they were not specifically raised before and ruled upon by the trial court. State ex rel. Flink v. Canova, 94 So.2d 181, 186 (Fla.1967) (en banc).
AFFIRMED.
ERVIN, BOOTH and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.