Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Malcolm Robert Lee MELVIN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-04-29
Citations: 569 F. App'x 157
Docket Number: No. 14-6266
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Malcolm Robert Lee MELVIN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 569
Pages: 157–158

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Malcolm Robert Lee MELVIN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 14-6266.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 24, 2014.
Decided: April 29, 2014.
Malcolm Robert Lee Melvin, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER. CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Malcolm Robert Lee Melvin appeals the district court's text order denying his motion for counsel and for an extension of time to file a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Melvin's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, Melvin has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.