Case Name: In the Matter of Bernadette Lopez, Respondent, v. Llewellyn Lucas, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2013-06-26
Citations: 107 A.D.3d 995
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Bernadette Lopez, Respondent, v Llewellyn Lucas, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 107
Pages: 995–996

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Bernadette Lopez, Respondent, v Llewellyn Lucas, Appellant.
[966 NYS2d 878]

Opinion:
In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, Llewellyn Lucas appeals from an order of protection of the Family Court, Richmond County (Oakes, Ct. Atty. Ref.), dated May 23, 2012, which, after a fact-finding hearing, and upon a finding, in effect, that he committed the family offenses of attempted assault, assault, aggravated harassment, harassment, disorderly conduct, menacing, reckless endangerment, stalking, and criminal mischief, directed him, inter alia, to stay away from the petitioner and to refrain from communicating with her for a period of 18 months.
Ordered that the order of protection is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the appellant's contention, under the circumstances of this case, including the unchallenged finding of the Family Court that the appellant choked the petitioner, the Family Court providently exercised its discretion in directing the appellant to stay away from the petitioner and to refrain from communicating with her for a period of 18 months (see Family Ct Act § 842; Matter of Richardson v Richardson, 80 AD3d 32, 44 [2010]; Matter of Déll'Isola v Dell'Isola, 19 AD3d 488, 488-489 [2005]; Matter of Valentin v Carrero, 12 AD3d 522, 522 [2004]; Matter of Betz v Betz, 241 AD2d 519 [1997]; see also Matter of Gonzalez v Acosta, 73 AD3d 921, 922 [2010]). Balkin, J.P., Leventhal, Sgroi and Miller, JJ., concur.