Case Name: In the Matter of Louise E. Dankberg et al., Respondents, v. Christopher B. Spuches, Appellant, and New York City Board of Elections, Respondent; In the Matter of Christopher B. Spuches, Appellant, v. Board of Elections in the City of New York et al., Respondents. Louise E. Dankberg, Objectant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2002-08-30
Citations: 98 N.Y.2d 706
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Louise E. Dankberg et al., Respondents, v Christopher B. Spuches, Appellant, and New York City Board of Elections, Respondent. In the Matter of Christopher B. Spuches, Appellant, v Board of Elections in the City of New York et al., Respondents. Louise E. Dankberg, Objectant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 98
Pages: 706–707

Head Matter:
[778 NE2d 545, 748 NYS2d 895]
In the Matter of Louise E. Dankberg et al., Respondents, v Christopher B. Spuches, Appellant, and New York City Board of Elections, Respondent. In the Matter of Christopher B. Spuches, Appellant, v Board of Elections in the City of New York et al., Respondents. Louise E. Dankberg, Objectant.
Argued August 28, 2002;
decided August 30, 2002
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Kantor Davidoff Wolfe Mandelker & Kass, P.C., New York City (Lawrence A. Mandelker and Matthew C. Resten of counsel), for appellant.
Arthur W. Greig, New York City, for Louise E. Dankberg and others, respondents.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, without costs (see, Matter of Rivera v Espada, 98 NY2d 422 [decided today]). Spuches' remaining contention that the New York City Board of Elections improperly invalidated his designating petition is without merit.
Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Graffeo. Taking no part: Judge Rosenblatt.