Case Name: Charles Dixon, Respondent, v. Cortland Snook, Appellant; Jane Mahanna, Appellant, v. Frank Philips, Respondent; James S. Otis, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1911-10
Citations: 146 A.D. 905
Docket Number: 
Parties: Charles Dixon, Respondent, v. Cortland Snook, Appellant. Jane Mahanna, Appellant, v. Frank Philips, Respondent. James S. Otis, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 146
Pages: 905–905

Head Matter:
Charles Dixon, Respondent, v. Cortland Snook, Appellant. Jane Mahanna, Appellant, v. Frank Philips, Respondent. James S. Otis, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.

Opinion:
The foregoing eases having been twice, reached in their regular order upon the calendar, and twice passed, are dismissed under general rule 39.