Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Monserrat CANTU-CRUZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-03-16
Citations: 173 F. App'x 613
Docket Number: No. 04-10350
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Monserrat CANTU-CRUZ, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: CANBY, BEEZER and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 173
Pages: 613–613

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Monserrat CANTU-CRUZ, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 04-10350.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 8, 2006.
Decided March 16, 2006.
Anne E. Mosher, Esq., Christina M. Cabanillas, Esq., USTU—Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff—Appellee.
Leslie A. Bowman, Esq., Law Office of Leslie A. Bowman, Tucson, AZ, for Defendant—Appellant.
Before: CANBY, BEEZER and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Monserrat Cantu-Cruz appeals from the 46-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for illegal entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), as enhanced by (b)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. The parties' joint motion for a limited remand pursuant to United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc), is GRANTED and the sentence is REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.