Case Name: Jason A. HARBIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lori PARTIN; Julian L. Stoudemire; Stoudemire & Sprouse Law Firm PA, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-10-19
Citations: 699 F. App'x 186
Docket Number: No. 17-1719
Parties: Jason A. HARBIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lori PARTIN; Julian L. Stoudemire; Stoudemire & Sprouse Law Firm PA, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 699
Pages: 186–186

Head Matter:
Jason A. HARBIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lori PARTIN; Julian L. Stoudemire; Stoudemire & Sprouse Law Firm PA, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 17-1719
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: October 17, 2017
Decided: October 19, 2017
Jason A. Harbin, Appellant Pro Se.
Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jason A, Harbin appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harbin v. Partin, No. 8:17-cv-00575-MG, 2017 WL 1376365L (D.S.C. Apr. 11, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED