Case Name: John H. F. Uhlenhaut, Respondent v. The Manhattan Railway Company, et al., Appellants
Court: New York Superior Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1892-04-11
Citations: 28 Jones & S. 501
Docket Number: 
Parties: John H. F. Uhlenhaut, Respondent v. The Manhattan Railway Company, et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Reports of cases argued and determined in the Superior Court of the city of New York
Volume: 60
Pages: 501–502

Head Matter:
John H. F. Uhlenhaut, Respondent v. The Manhattan Railway Company, et al., Appellants.
Decided April 11,1892.
Appeal by defendants from judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon decision of judge at special term.
Davies & Rapallo, for appellants. Charles E. Crowell, attorney, and Roger Foster of counsel, for respondent.
Before Sedgwick, Ch. J., Dugro and Gildersleeve, JJ.

Opinion:
The trial judge directed each of defendants' proposed findings to be marked " refused except so far as covered by the findings of fact and conclusions of law settled and signed by me." The general term held that this was not prejudicial error requiring reversal. Opinion by Dugro, J.; Sedgwick, Ch. J. and Gildersleeve, J., concurred. Judgment affirmed, with costs.