Case Name: Dennis W. SANDERS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-01-25
Citations: 155 S.W.3d 804
Docket Number: No. ED 83956
Parties: Dennis W. SANDERS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 155
Pages: 804–805

Head Matter:
Dennis W. SANDERS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 83956.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Jan. 25, 2005.
Maleaner Ryna Harvey, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Andrea K. Spillars, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Dennis W. Sanders appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing. He contends his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to investigate and call two witnesses who would have provided him a viable defense.
Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).