Case Name: Britton BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1999-03-17
Citations: 731 So. 2d 724
Docket Number: No. 98-01051
Parties: Britton BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and WHATLEY and CASANUEVA, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 731
Pages: 724–724

Head Matter:
Britton BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 98-01051.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
March 17, 1999.
Sean K. Ahmed, Nichols and Ahmed, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Britton Brown, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sonya Roebuck Hor-belt, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the sentences of three and one-half years' imprisonment which were entered on resentencing after the trial court had granted a postconviction motion. The trial court orally imposed these sentences to be concurrent with any other sentence that Mr. Brown was serving. Unfortunately, the written sentence did not indicate that it was concurrent with "any active sentence being served," but rather specifically listed some, but not all, of those active sentences. To avoid any possible confusion on the part of the Department of Corrections, the trial court shall modify the written sentences on remand to indicate that they are concurrent with any active sentence being served.
Affirmed with instructions.
ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and WHATLEY and CASANUEVA, JJ., Concur.