Case Name: Nelson BRADLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Douglas VARGO; Alphonso Hicks; Marvin Lee; David Garraghty, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-06-11
Citations: 13 F. App'x 69
Docket Number: No. 01-6489
Parties: Nelson BRADLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Douglas VARGO; Alphonso Hicks; Marvin Lee; David Garraghty, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINS, TRAKLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 13
Pages: 69–69

Head Matter:
Nelson BRADLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Douglas VARGO; Alphonso Hicks; Marvin Lee; David Garraghty, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 01-6489.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 31, 2001.
Decided June 11, 2001.
Nelson Bradley, pro se. William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for appellees.
Before WILKINS, TRAKLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Nelson Bradley appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bradley v. Vargo, No. CA-99-1230-2 (E.D.Va. Feb. 26, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.