Case Name: Paul LOVE, Appellant, v. CURATORS OF the UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI; BTi Employee Screening Services; Bill Mitchell, Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-08-03
Citations: 230 F. App'x 639
Docket Number: No. 06-1816
Parties: Paul LOVE, Appellant, v. CURATORS OF the UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI; BTi Employee Screening Services; Bill Mitchell, Appellees.
Judges: Before SMITH, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 230
Pages: 639–640

Head Matter:
Paul LOVE, Appellant, v. CURATORS OF the UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI; BTi Employee Screening Services; Bill Mitchell, Appellees.
No. 06-1816.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: July 5, 2007.
Filed: Aug. 3, 2007.
Paul Love, Columbia, MO, pro se.
Phillip J. Hoskins, University of Missouri General Counsel’s Office, Columbia, MO, W. Robert King, Couch & Pierce, Overland Park, KS, for Appellees.
Before SMITH, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Paul Love appeals the district court's order dismissing his action based on the court's determination that the parties had reached a settlement agreement. Having carefully reviewed the record, we agree with the district court that the parties reached a settlement agreement at their August 23, 2005 meeting, and that the terms of the agreement are embodied in the transcript of the meeting. See Chaganti & Assocs., P.C. v. Nowotny, 470 F.3d 1215, 1221 (8th Cir.2006) (appeals court reviews for clear error district court's finding that settlement agreement existed), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 2977, — L.Ed.2d - (2007) (No. 06-1377). In addition, we find nothing in the record to support Love's unsubstantiated claim that he was coerced into the agreement.
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.