Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cesar Humberto ANGULO-FELIX, a.k.a. Cesar Angulo, a.k.a. Ceasar Humberto Angulo-Felix, a.k.a. Cesar H. Angulo-Felix, a.k.a. Ceasar Humberto Angulo-Feliz, a.k.a. Geronimo Arrielo Lopez, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-04-11
Citations: 686 F. App'x 502
Docket Number: No. 16-10212
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cesar Humberto ANGULO-FELIX, a.k.a. Cesar Angulo, a.k.a. Ceasar Humberto Angulo-Felix, a.k.a. Cesar H. Angulo-Felix, a.k.a. Ceasar Humberto Angulo-Feliz, a.k.a. Geronimo Arrielo Lopez, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 686
Pages: 502–502

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cesar Humberto ANGULO-FELIX, a.k.a. Cesar Angulo, a.k.a. Ceasar Humberto Angulo-Felix, a.k.a. Cesar H. Angulo-Felix, a.k.a. Ceasar Humberto Angulo-Feliz, a.k.a. Geronimo Arrielo Lopez, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-10212
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 7, 2017
Filed April 11, 2017
Krissa Marie Lanham, USPX—Office of the US Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Marc J. Victor, Marc J. Victor PC, Chandler, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant
Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Cesar Humberto Angulo-Felix appeals from the district court's judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 63-month sentence for re-entry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Angulo-Felix's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel. We have provided Angulo-Felix the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Angulo-Felix waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Because the record discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the appeal waiver, we dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009).
Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.