Case Name: John NEILL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Paul H. WEINSTEIN, Administrative Judge, Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-05-01
Citations: 33 F. App'x 148
Docket Number: No. 01-2485
Parties: John NEILL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Paul H. WEINSTEIN, Administrative Judge, Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 33
Pages: 148–148

Head Matter:
John NEILL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Paul H. WEINSTEIN, Administrative Judge, Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 01-2485.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 25, 2002.
Decided May 1, 2002.
John Neill, Appellant Pro Se. Julia Melville Andrew, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
John Neill appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Neill v. Weinstein, No. CA-01-2333-AW (D. Md. filed Nov. 14, 2001; entered Nov. 15, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.