Case Name: Miguel M. LOPEZ, Petitioner, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION of Arizona, Respondent, American Smelting & Refining Company, Respondent Employer, State Compensation Fund, Respondent Carrier
Court: Arizona Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Arizona
Decision Date: 1970-12-16
Citations: 13 Ariz. App. 484
Docket Number: No. 1 CA-IC 405
Parties: Miguel M. LOPEZ, Petitioner, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION of Arizona, Respondent, American Smelting & Refining Company, Respondent Employer, State Compensation Fund, Respondent Carrier.
Judges: STEVENS and JACOBSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Arizona Appeals Reports
Volume: 13
Pages: 484–485

Head Matter:
477 P.2d 770
Miguel M. LOPEZ, Petitioner, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION of Arizona, Respondent, American Smelting & Refining Company, Respondent Employer, State Compensation Fund, Respondent Carrier.
No. 1 CA-IC 405.
Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department A.
Dec. 16, 1970.
Morgan & Jerome by D. .A. Jerome, Phoenix, for petitioner.
Donald L. Cross, Chief Counsel by William C. Wahl, Jr., Phoenix, for respondent, Industrial Commission of Arizona.
Evans, Kitchel & Jenckes by Stephen W. Pogson, Phoenix, for respondent employer.
Robert K. Park, Chief Counsel, Phoenix, for respondent, State Compensation Fund.

Opinion:
DONOFRIO, Presiding Judge.
This case is before the Court by writ of certiorari to test the lawfulness of an award and findings of the Industrial Commission issued December 31, 1969, finding that the petitioner did not have new, additional or previously undiscovered disability referable to his industrial accident of March 24, 1954. ,
The sole issue presented in this appeal is whether the award of the Industrial Commission is reasonably supported by the evidence.
As we have frequently stated in the past, although we can well sympathize with the petitioner, our function is not to try the case anew, but merely to determine whether the evidence before the Commission is sufficient to reasonably support their decision. Torrez v. Industrial Commission, 12 Ariz.App. 21, 467 P.2d 245 (1970) ; Andreason v. Industrial Commission, 6 Ariz.App. 434, 433 P.2d 287 (1967); Nye v. Industrial Commission, 5 Ariz.App. 165, 424 P.2d 207 (1967); Nelson v. Industrial Commission, 2 Ariz.App. 403, 409 P.2d 562 (1966); Charles v. Industrial Commission, 2 Ariz.App. 202, 407 P.2d 391 (1965). In the instant case, we have reviewed the record before the Commission and find that the award is reasonably supported by the evidence.
Award affirmed.
STEVENS and JACOBSON, JJ., concur.
. This case was decided under the law as it existed prior to January 1,1969.