Case Name: Sarah Pinneo et al. v. Augustus F. Knox et al.
Court: Illinois Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Illinois
Decision Date: 1881-09
Citations: 100 Ill. 471
Docket Number: 
Parties: Sarah Pinneo et al. v. Augustus F. Knox et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Illinois Reports
Volume: 100
Pages: 471–471

Head Matter:
Sarah Pinneo et al. v. Augustus F. Knox et al.
At Ottawa, September Term, 1881.
Appeal from, a trial court to this court—bill to foreclose mortgage—freehold. A bill in chancery to foreclose a mortgage upon real estate does not involve a freehold. Therefore in such a suit an appeal does not lie directly from the trial court to this court. The appeal should be taken in the first instance to an Appellate Court.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Will county.
This was a suit in chancery for the foreclosure of a mortgage upon real estate.
Mr. C. B. Garnsey, for the appellee ' Knox, moved the court to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction, there not being a freehold involved in the suit, and none of the other conditions necessary to give this court jurisdiction of the appeal, existing.

Opinion:
Walker, J.:
In this case, in the court below, a bill was filed to foreclose a mortgage, and a decree rendered in that court, and an appeal is brought to this court. Motion is now entered to dismiss the appeal. We have frequently held that a bill to foreclose a mortgage does not involve a freehold, and that the appeal should be taken from the circuit to the Appellate Court, and not to this.
The appeal will therefore be dismissed.
Appeal dismissed«