Case Name: Jeffrey HOBBS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-04-02
Citations: 72 S.W.3d 222
Docket Number: No. ED 80171
Parties: Jeffrey HOBBS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GEORGE W. DRAPER III, P.J. and MARY R. RUSSELL, J. and MARY •K. HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 72
Pages: 222–222

Head Matter:
Jeffrey HOBBS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 80171.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
April 2, 2002.
Nancy L. Vincent, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Nicole E. Gorovsky, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before GEORGE W. DRAPER III, P.J. and MARY R. RUSSELL, J. and MARY •K. HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Jeffrey Hobbs, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without a hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's decision is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only, which sets forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).