Case Name: William L. Nodell, Respondent, v. Gravoil Heater Corporation and Others, Appellants. App Tunnelling Machine Company, Inc., and Others, Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1930-02
Citations: 228 A.D. 796
Docket Number: 
Parties: William L. Nodell, Respondent, v. Gravoil Heater Corporation and Others, Appellants. App Tunnelling Machine Company, Inc., and Others, Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 228
Pages: 796–796

Head Matter:
William L. Nodell, Respondent, v. Gravoil Heater Corporation and Others, Appellants. App Tunnelling Machine Company, Inc., and Others, Defendants.

Opinion:
Orders denying defendants' motions to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The two causes of action may properly be construed as common-law actions for deceit. (Brackett v. Griswold, 112 N. Y. 454.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.