Case Name: CITY OF TAMPA, Petitioner, v. Joe Richard REDNER, Edith Ann Burns and Mary B. Fernandez, Respondents
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-12-20
Citations: 597 So. 2d 305
Docket Number: No. 91-01961
Parties: CITY OF TAMPA, Petitioner, v. Joe Richard REDNER, Edith Ann Burns and Mary B. Fernandez, Respondents.
Judges: DANAHY, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 597
Pages: 305–305

Head Matter:
CITY OF TAMPA, Petitioner, v. Joe Richard REDNER, Edith Ann Burns and Mary B. Fernandez, Respondents.
No. 91-01961.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Dec. 20, 1991.
Michael A. Fogarty and Linda Julin McNamara, Glenn, Rasmussen, Fogarty, Merryday & Russo, Tampa, for petitioner.
Luke Charles Lirot, Thomas C. Little, P.A., Clearwater, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this petition for writ of certiorari, we review a decision of the circuit court sitting in its appellate capacity. In the appeal before it, the circuit court reversed a county court decision which had found valid Tampa City Ordinance 8482-A. In reversing, the circuit court ruled that Ordinance 8482-A, which promulgated Chapter 43A of the Tampa Zoning Code was invalidly enacted because the City failed to comply with the requirements of section 166.-041(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1983). We find that the circuit court did not depart from the essential requirements of law and, accordingly, deny the petition. Combs v. State, 436 So.2d 93 (Fla.1983).
DANAHY, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.