Case Name: Ira J. Goldman, as Assignee of Gamwin Enterprises, Inc., Appellant, v. Stephen A. Weingrad et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1996-06-11
Citations: 228 A.D.2d 240
Docket Number: 
Parties: Ira J. Goldman, as Assignee of Gamwin Enterprises, Inc., Appellant, v Stephen A. Weingrad et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 228
Pages: 240–241

Head Matter:
Ira J. Goldman, as Assignee of Gamwin Enterprises, Inc., Appellant, v Stephen A. Weingrad et al., Respondents.
[643 NYS2d 343]

Opinion:
Defendants submitted documentary evidence establishing that plaintiff would be unable to establish any of the elements of a fraud cause of action (see, Zaref v Berk & Michaels, 192 AD2d 346, 348). The court's order imposing sanctions on plaintiffs attorney in this action, for pursuing frivolous litigation satisfied the requirements of 22 NYCRR 130-1.2. We decline to impose a further sanction. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Ross and Tom, JJ.