Case Name: Sheila DISANTO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Division of Retirement, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-05-22
Citations: 817 So. 2d 946
Docket Number: No. 3D01-2161
Parties: Sheila DISANTO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Division of Retirement, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GODERICH and SORONDO, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 817
Pages: 946–946

Head Matter:
Sheila DISANTO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Division of Retirement, Appellee.
No. 3D01-2161.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 22, 2002.
Jay M. Levy, Miami, for appellant.
Larry D. Scott, Tallahassee, for appel-lee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GODERICH and SORONDO, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Because there was competent, substantial evidence to support the Commission's findings of fact, we affirm. Botner v. State, Dep't of Admin. Div. of Ret., 438 So.2d 94, 95 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Division of Ret. v. Allen, 395 So.2d 1192, 1192 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Kennedy v. Wiggins, 368 So.2d 454, 455-56 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).