Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Bruce Albaladejo, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2004-09-30
Citations: 10 A.D.3d 582
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Bruce Albaladejo, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 10
Pages: 582–583

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Bruce Albaladejo, Appellant.
[782 NYS2d 91]

Opinion:
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lawrence Tonetti, J.), rendered December 10, 2001, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and assault in the second degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of eight years and five years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.
To the extent that the prosecutor's summation comment that defense counsel was attempting to "embarrass" or "harass" the complainant was inappropriate, any prejudice was prevented by the court's thorough curative instructions (see People v Santiago, 52 NY2d 865 [1981]). The prosecutor's summarization of the contents of a 911 tape that had been received in evidence, and her argument that the defense summation contained a concession concerning a witness's credibility, constituted fair comment (see People v Overlee, 236 AD2d 133 [1997], lv denied 91 NY2d 976 [1998]; People v D'Alessandro, 184 AD2d 114, 118-119 [1992], lv denied 81 NY2d 884 [1993]). Defendant's remaining challenges to the prosecutor's summation, as well as his challenge to the court's charge, are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Ellerin, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.