Case Name: WHITTLESEY v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1914-05-27
Citations: 167 S.W. 345
Docket Number: No. 3148
Parties: WHITTLESEY v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 167
Pages: 345–345

Head Matter:
WHITTLESEY v. STATE.
(No. 3148.)
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
May 27, 1914.)
Criminal Law (§ 1121 ) — Appeal—Record.
Where the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction was assigned as ground for new trial, it cannot be reviewed, unless the evidence is in the record on appeal.
[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2938, 2939; Dec. Dig. § 1121. ]
Appeal from Sabine County Court; J. B. Lewis, Judge.
Travis Whittlesey was convicted of violating the local option law, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
See, also, 163 S. W. 78.
C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
For other eases see same topic and section NUMBER in Dec. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key-No. Series & Rep’r Indexes

Opinion:
HARPER, J.
Appellant was prosecuted and convicted of violating the local prohibition law, and prosecutes this appeal.
The only grounds in the motion for a new trial contend that the evidence will not sustain the conviction. As the evidence adduced on the trial does not accompany the record, we cannot review those grounds, and the judgment is affirmed.