Case Name: Danny M. KELLY, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. MCDONALD'S CORPORATION; Canobie Lake Park Corporation, Defendants, Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-06-29
Citations: 15 F. App'x 1
Docket Number: No. 00-2410
Parties: Danny M. KELLY, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. MCDONALD’S CORPORATION; Canobie Lake Park Corporation, Defendants, Appellees.
Judges: Before BOWNES, Senior Circuit Judge, TORRUELLA and LIPEZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 15
Pages: 1–2

Head Matter:
Danny M. KELLY, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. MCDONALD’S CORPORATION; Canobie Lake Park Corporation, Defendants, Appellees.
No. 00-2410.
United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
June 29, 2001.
Danny M. Kelly, on brief pro se.
John P. Noyes and Gilberg & Kiernan, on defendant-appellee McDonald’s Corporation’s Motion for Summary Disposition.
Cathryn Spaulding and Zizik, Lasalle & Powers, P.C., on appellee, Canobie Lake Park Corporation’s Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Disposition.
Before BOWNES, Senior Circuit Judge, TORRUELLA and LIPEZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The district court dismissed the claims against McDonald's Corporation for failure to state a claim. Later, the court dismissed any intended "civil rights" claim against Canobie Lake Park for failure to state a cognizable federal claim and, when plaintiff failed to substantiate the requisite amount in controversy for diversity jurisdiction, the remaining claims were dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
Reviewing the judgment de novo in light of the record and the parties' arguments on appeal, we affirm. See Loc.R. 27(c).