Case Name: William E. MICHEL, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Yvonne K. BILYK, f/n/a Michel, Respondent/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-03-07
Citations: 894 S.W.2d 253
Docket Number: No. 65932
Parties: William E. MICHEL, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Yvonne K. BILYK, f/n/a Michel, Respondent/Appellant.
Judges: Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 894
Pages: 253–254

Head Matter:
William E. MICHEL, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Yvonne K. BILYK, f/n/a Michel, Respondent/Appellant.
No. 65932.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
March 7, 1995.
Alfred A. Speer, II, Clayton, for appellant.
David L. Baylard, Daniel J. Briegel, Brie-gel, Baylard, P.C., Union, for respondent.
Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Mother appeals the trial court's modification of the custody provisions of an October 5, 1990 dissolution decree. We affirm. The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).