Case Name: Charles A. Hirsch, as Agent for 1139 Brighton Beach Avenue Realty Corp., Landlord, Respondent, v. Ruwin Coleman, Tenant, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1948-01-22
Citations: 190 Misc. 809
Docket Number: 
Parties: Charles A. Hirsch, as Agent for 1139 Brighton Beach Avenue Realty Corp., Landlord, Respondent, v. Ruwin Coleman, Tenant, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 190
Pages: 809–809

Head Matter:
Charles A. Hirsch, as Agent for 1139 Brighton Beach Avenue Realty Corp., Landlord, Respondent, v. Ruwin Coleman, Tenant, Appellant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
January 22, 1948.
Jesse Victor Levy for appellant.
No appearance for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Memorandum The corporate landlord is an entity distinct from its sole stockholders and therefore does not come within the purview of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of section 209 of the Federal Housing and Rent Act of 1947 (U. S. Code, tit. 50, Appendix, § 1881 et seq.).
The final order should be unanimously reversed upon the law, with $30 costs to the tenant, and final order directed for the tenant.
MacCrate, Steinbeink and Fennelly, JJ., concur.
Final order reversed, etc.