Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tracy COX, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-09-24
Citations: 490 F. App'x 300
Docket Number: No. 12-11216
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tracy COX, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MARCUS, MARTIN and FAY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 490
Pages: 300–300

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tracy COX, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-11216
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Sept. 24, 2012.
Peggy Morris Ronca, Robert Edward Bodnar, Jr., U.S. Attorney’s Office, Orlando, FL, Robert E. O’Neill, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Charles E. Taylor, Jr., Law Office of Charles E. Taylor, Jr., Orlando, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Tracy Cox, Miami, FL, pro se.
Before MARCUS, MARTIN and FAY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Charles E. Taylor, appointed counsel for Tracy Cox in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Cox's conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.