Case Name: In re D.D.
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2016-08-23
Citations: 147 Ohio St. 3d 111
Docket Number: No. 2015-1816
Parties: In re D.D.
Judges: O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, and French, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 147
Pages: 111–111

Head Matter:
In re D.D.
(No. 2015-1816
Submitted July 13, 2016
Decided August 23, 2016.)
Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Charlyn Bohland, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant, D.D.

Opinion:
{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed as to the holding regarding due process on the authority of In re D.S., 146 Ohio St.3d 182, 2016-Ohio-1027, 54 N.E.3d 1184.
{¶ 2} The remainder of the appeal is dismissed as having been improvidently accepted.
O'Connor, C.J., and O'Donnell, Kennedy, and French, JJ., concur.
Pfeifer, Lanzinger, and O'Neill, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in In re D.S. and would order briefing on the issues raised in the remainder of the appeal.