Case Name: JAMES v. UNITED STATES
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1926-12-08
Citations: 16 F.2d 125
Docket Number: No. 4704
Parties: JAMES v. UNITED STATES.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 16
Pages: 125–125

Head Matter:
JAMES v. UNITED STATES.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
December 8, 1926.)
No. 4704
. Edward N. Barnard, of Detroit, Mich., for plaintiff in error.
David Polasky, of Detroit, Mich. (Delos G-. Smith, U. S. Atty., of Detroit, Mich., on the brief), for the United States.
Before DENISON and MOORMAN, Circuit Judges, and HOUGH, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed — as to proof of another offense, on authority of Moore v. U. S., 150 U. S. 57, 61, 14 S. Ct. 26, 37 L. Ed. 996; Tucker v. U. S. (C. C. A. 6) 224 F. 833, 840; De Witt v. U. S. (C. C. A. 6) 291 F. 995, 1002; as to variance affeeting the fourth count, on authority of Claassen v. U. S., 142 U. S. 140, 12 S. Ct. 169, 35 L. Ed. 966, and Bullock v. U. S. (C. C. A. 6) 289 F. 29, 31; as to restriction of cross-examination, because within the discretion of the trial judge.