Case Name: William DOCK, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1971-10-26
Citations: 253 So. 2d 711
Docket Number: No. 71-473
Parties: William DOCK, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SWAN, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 253
Pages: 711–711

Head Matter:
William DOCK, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 71-473.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 26, 1971.
Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and Lewis S. Kimler, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and J. Robert Olian, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.
Before SWAN, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This appeal is by the defendant below from his conviction, upon a jury trial, of the offense of grand larceny with which he had been charged by information. In seeking reversal, the appellant argued insufficiency of the evidence, and that the trial court erred in denying a motion of the defendant for mistrial and in rulings which permitted testimony of a non-listed state witness and which allowed the state to present certain testimony on rebuttal. Upon consideration thereof in the light of the record, briefs and applicable principles of law, we conclude that reversible error has not been shown.
Affirmed.