Case Name: THE UPHAM MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. GIBSON and WARRINGTON
Court: Ohio Circuit Court
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1898-01
Citations: 18 Ohio C.C. 889
Docket Number: 
Parties: THE UPHAM MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. GIBSON and WARRINGTON.
Judges: Before Cox, Smith and Swing, JJ.
Reporter: Reports of cases argued and determined in the circuit courts of Ohio
Volume: 18
Pages: 889–889

Head Matter:
(First Circuit — Hamilton Co., O., Circuit Court
Jan. Term, 1898.)
Before Cox, Smith and Swing, JJ.
THE UPHAM MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. GIBSON and WARRINGTON.
Bill of Exceptions — Unless presented to the trial judge live days before expiration of the fifty days provided by the statute, the ■ court uses jurisdiction in the case.
(For former decision of the Circuit Court in this case, see 15 C. C., 670.)
H. P. Lloyd, for Plaintiff in Error.
W. W. Prather, for Defendant in Error.

Opinion:
Swing, J.
We see no reason to change the decision heretofore announced by us in this case as to striking the bill of exceptions from the files and therefoe affirming the judgment, as all the errors relied on arise out cf the bill of exceptions. The reocrd as corrected shows that the motion for a new trial was overruled July 22, instead of June 29. The bill of exceptions was signed and filed September 9, this was forty-nine days from the date of the overruling of the motion for a new trial.
The record recites, on the 9th of September: "Now comes
and presents this its bill of exceptions." The law requires it to be presented to the judge at least five days before the expiration of the fifty days, and this our Supreme Court has held is jurisdictional,and that unless so presented,the judge loses jurisdiction tc sign the bill. This entry clearly shows that it was not presented until the forty-ninth day.