Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MARK ANTHONY DOWN, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1993-08-18
Citations: 122 Or. App. 416
Docket Number: 91C-20972; CA A73663
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MARK ANTHONY DOWN, Appellant.
Judges: Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Rossman and Edmonds, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 122
Pages: 416–418

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted March 31,
affirmed August 18,
reconsideration denied October 27,
petition for review denied December 21, 1993 (318 Or 246)
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MARK ANTHONY DOWN, Appellant.
(91C-20972; CA A73663)
856 P2d 645
Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.
Amy E. Alpaugh, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.
Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Rossman and Edmonds, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant was convicted of three counts of robbery in the first degree, ORS 164.415, after he entered into a plea agreement. Defendant appeals, arguing that the court erred in calculating his criminal history. Under ORS 138.222(2)(d), we may not review his claim of error. See State v. Adams, 315 Or 359, 847 P2d 397 (1993); State v. Kilborn, 120 Or App 462, 852 P2d 935 (1993); State v. Johnston, 120 Or App 165, 851 P2d 1156 (1993).
Affirmed.