Case Name: COMMERCE BANK OF ST. LOUIS, N.A., Plaintiff/Respondent, v. ECOSSE, INC., et al., Defendants/Appellants
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1994-08-30
Citations: 882 S.W.2d 765
Docket Number: No. 65476
Parties: COMMERCE BANK OF ST. LOUIS, N.A., Plaintiff/Respondent, v. ECOSSE, INC., et al., Defendants/Appellants.
Judges: Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 882
Pages: 765–765

Head Matter:
COMMERCE BANK OF ST. LOUIS, N.A., Plaintiff/Respondent, v. ECOSSE, INC., et al., Defendants/Appellants.
No. 65476.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Aug. 30, 1994.
David L. Campbell, St. Louis, for appellant.
Michael A. Becker, Clayton, for respondent.
Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellants, Ecosse, Inc., et. al., appeal from the grant of summary judgment entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County in favor of respondent, Commerce Bank of St. Louis, on a guarantee of a corporate promissory note. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the findings of the Circuit Court not a palpable abuse of its discretion. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the Circuit Court's decision pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties here involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.