Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gregory Lee HIPPS, a/k/a G, a/k/a Bryan Cross, a/k/a Bryan Dwight Cross, a/k/a Gregory Lee Hipps, Jr., a/k/a Patrick Jacques Pluviose, a/k/a Mark A. Pointer, a/k/a John Peters, a/k/a Marcus Lee Smith, a/k/a Eddie Junior Lawson, Jr., a/k/a Gregory Darrell Stewart, a/k/a Roger Lee Williams, a/k/a Kevin Smith, a/k/a Marcus A. Johnson, a/k/a Brian K. Cross, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-07-23
Citations: 474 F. App'x 396
Docket Number: No. 12-6523
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Gregory Lee HIPPS, a/k/a G, a/k/a Bryan Cross, a/k/a Bryan Dwight Cross, a/k/a Gregory Lee Hipps, Jr., a/k/a Patrick Jacques Pluviose, a/k/a Mark A. Pointer, a/k/a John Peters, a/k/a Marcus Lee Smith, a/k/a Eddie Junior Lawson, Jr., a/k/a Gregory Darrell Stewart, a/k/a Roger Lee Williams, a/k/a Kevin Smith, a/k/a Marcus A. Johnson, a/k/a Brian K. Cross, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 474
Pages: 396–396

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Gregory Lee HIPPS, a/k/a G, a/k/a Bryan Cross, a/k/a Bryan Dwight Cross, a/k/a Gregory Lee Hipps, Jr., a/k/a Patrick Jacques Pluviose, a/k/a Mark A. Pointer, a/k/a John Peters, a/k/a Marcus Lee Smith, a/k/a Eddie Junior Lawson, Jr., a/k/a Gregory Darrell Stewart, a/k/a Roger Lee Williams, a/k/a Kevin Smith, a/k/a Marcus A. Johnson, a/k/a Brian K. Cross, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 12-6523.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 19, 2012.
Decided: July 23, 2012.
Gregory Lee Hipps, Appellant Pro Se. Howard Jacob Zlotnick, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Gregory Lee Hipps appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hipps, No. 2:96-cr-00208-RAJ-l (E.D.Va. Feb. 17, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.