Case Name: Gerard COLIN, for his minor daughter, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gretchen WALTHER; David L. Walther; Walther & Larkin, LLP, Defendants-Appellees, and Bente Busch-Spann; Bettina Lynn; South T. Lynn, Jr.; Diego Alicia Calderon; Debbie Jones, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-04-12
Citations: 92 F. App'x 965
Docket Number: No. 03-2300
Parties: Gerard COLIN, for his minor daughter, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Gretchen WALTHER; David L. Walther; Walther & Larkin, LLP, Defendants—Appellees, and Bente Busch-Spann; Bettina Lynn; South T. Lynn, Jr.; Diego Alicia Calderon; Debbie Jones, Defendants.
Judges: Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 92
Pages: 965–966

Head Matter:
Gerard COLIN, for his minor daughter, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Gretchen WALTHER; David L. Walther; Walther & Larkin, LLP, Defendants—Appellees, and Bente Busch-Spann; Bettina Lynn; South T. Lynn, Jr.; Diego Alicia Calderon; Debbie Jones, Defendants.
No. 03-2300.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 12, 2004.
Decided: April 12, 2004.
Pierre Choné, Choné & Associates, P.L.L.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellant.
Alvin I. Frederick, Jeffrey W. Bredeck, Eccleston & Wolf, P.C., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Gerard Colin commenced a suit in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland on behalf of himself and his infant daughter. The complaint arose out of legal action taken in New Mexico by Gretchen Walther, David L. Walther and their law firm (collectively "the attorneys") and allegations of kidnaping and assault occurring in Maryland by Bente BuschSpann, Bettina Lynn, South T. Lynn, Jr., Diego Alicia Calderon and Debbie Jones. The district court granted the attorneys' motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Colin voluntarily dismissed the remaining defendants so as to challenge in this court the granting of the motion to dismiss.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Colin v. Walther, No. CA-03-1434-8-RDB (D.Md. Aug. 22, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED