Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. BARRETT MICHAEL MOONEY, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1996-10-02
Citations: 143 Or. App. 624
Docket Number: 94CR1309; CA A92682
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. BARRETT MICHAEL MOONEY, Appellant.
Judges: Before Richardson, Chief Judge, and Riggs and Landau, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 143
Pages: 624–625

Head Matter:
Submitted on record and briefs August 22,
remanded for resentencing October 2, 1996
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. BARRETT MICHAEL MOONEY, Appellant.
(94CR1309; CA A92682)
924 P2d 875
Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, and Stephen J. Williams, Deputy Public Defender, filed the brief for appellant.
Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Judith Brant, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Richardson, Chief Judge, and Riggs and Landau, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant appeals the sentence that was imposed after his probation was revoked. He had initially pled guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, unauthorized use of a vehicle and criminal mischief in the first degree. On the charge of being a felon in possession of a firearm, the court had originally imposed a downward departure sentence of 36 months' probation and then concurrent probation on the other two charges.
When defendant's probation was revoked, the court sentenced him on the first charge to an enhanced penalty of five years' imprisonment under ORS 161.610. The state concedes that the trial court erred in imposing a sentence under ORS 161.610. We agree.
Remanded for resentencing.