Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Barney D. WATSON, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-02-09
Citations: 87 F. App'x 13
Docket Number: No. 03-2558
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Barney D. WATSON, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 87
Pages: 13–14

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Barney D. WATSON, Appellant.
No. 03-2558.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 19, 2004.
Decided Feb. 9, 2004.
David Christopher Jones, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Springfield, MO, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Nancy Price, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Springfield, MO, Raymond C. Conrad, Jr., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Kansas City, MO, Barney D. Watson, pro se, Springfield, MO, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Without the benefit of a written plea agreement, Barney D. Watson pleaded guilty to unlawfully possessing a machine gun. The district court declined to depart downward from the Sentencing Guidelines, and sentenced Watson to 18 months imprisonment and 3 years supervised release. On appeal, Watson's counsel has moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), suggesting that the district court abused its discretion in denying a departure.
We find that the district court understood its authority to depart, and thus its discretionary decision not to do so is unreviewable. See United States v. Orozco-Rodriguez, 220 F.3d 940, 942 (8th Cir.2000). We also have carefully reviewed the record in accordance with Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), and have found no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw, and we affirm.
. The Honorable Richard E. Dorr, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.