Case Name: Candle et al., Appellants, v. Consolidated Rail Corporation et al., Appellees
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1994-06-15
Citations: 69 Ohio St. 3d 429
Docket Number: No. 93-2317
Parties: Candle et al., Appellants, v. Consolidated Rail Corporation et al., Appellees.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., AW. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 69
Pages: 429–429

Head Matter:
Candle et al., Appellants, v. Consolidated Rail Corporation et al., Appellees.
[Cite as Candle v. Consol. Rail Corp. (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 429.]
(No. 93-2317
Submitted May 11, 1994
Decided June 15, 1994.)
Aronson, Fineman & Davis Co., L.P.A, Kellie S. Kontnier and William J. Davis; C. Bruce Williams; Landskroner & Phillips Co., L.P.A, and Lawrence Landskroner, for appellants.
Vogelgesang, Hawes, Lindamood & Brunn and Philip E. Howes, for appellee Consolidated Rail Corporation.
James A Philomena, Mahoning County Prosecuting Attorney, and Kathi McNabb, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee Board of Commissioners of Mahoning County.

Opinion:
The judgment on appeal is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court on authority of Carpenter v. Consol. Rail Corp. (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 259, 631 N.E.2d 607.
Moyer, C.J., AW. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.