Case Name: In the Interest of D.P. and C.P
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-05-20
Citations: 110 S.W.3d 838
Docket Number: No. ED 81843
Parties: In the Interest of D.P. and C.P.
Judges: Before: MARY R. RUSSELL, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 110
Pages: 838–839

Head Matter:
In the Interest of D.P. and C.P.
No. ED 81843.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
May 20, 2003.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 14, 2003.
Celeste Leritz Endicott, Webster Groves, MO, for Appellant.
Dorothy E. Schuehat, St. Louis, MO, for Guardian ad Litem.
Lance Christian Bretsnyder, Kevin Lake, Clayton, MO, for Respondent-Juvenile Officer.
Before: MARY R. RUSSELL, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
C.H. ("Mother") appeals the judgment of the trial court terminating her parental rights. Mother argues the trial court erred in terminating her rights as there was insufficient evidence to support the findings and further it was not in the best interest of the children. We find no error and affirm.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).