Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wayne Mark BROWN, Defendant-Appellant; United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wayne Mark Brown, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-06-11
Citations: 36 F. App'x 519
Docket Number: Nos. 02-6496, 02-6543
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wayne Mark BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wayne Mark Brown, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 36
Pages: 519–520

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wayne Mark BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wayne Mark Brown, Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 02-6496, 02-6543.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 30, 2002.
Decided June 11, 2002.
Wayne Mark Brown, Pro Se. Marshall Prince, Office of the United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appel-lee.
Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In these consolidated appeals, Mark Wayne Brown appeals the district court's order denying his request for pre-trial, trial, and sentencing transcripts. Brown claims he should receive free access to the transcripts because he plans to raise claims of prosecutorial misconduct and ineffective assistance of counsel in a habeas proceeding filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We find that Brown has not demonstrated an adequate need for the transcripts by merely providing the type of claims he plans to present in his habeas motion. See 28 U.S.C. § 753(f) (1994). Accordingly, the order of the district court is affirmed. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.