Case Name: Duane MONTGOMERY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Wayne County Sheriff's Department; United States Department of Homeland Security; United States Department of Justice; Federal Defender's Office; U.S. District Court, Mi; Stephen J. Murphy, III; Craig A. Weier; S. Pierson, Lieutenant; Special Agent Donaldson; Special Agent Allen; Agent Terry; W. Malatinsky, Clinical Director; Chairman; Member; U.S. Marshal, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-07-22
Citations: 654 F. App'x 635
Docket Number: No. 16-6484
Parties: Duane MONTGOMERY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Wayne County Sheriff’s Department; United States Department of Homeland Security; United States Department of Justice; Federal Defender’s Office; U.S. District Court, Mi; Stephen J. Murphy, III; Craig A. Weier; S. Pierson, Lieutenant; Special Agent Donaldson; Special Agent Allen; Agent Terry; W. Malatinsky, Clinical Director; Chairman; Member; U.S. Marshal, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 654
Pages: 635–636

Head Matter:
Duane MONTGOMERY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Wayne County Sheriff’s Department; United States Department of Homeland Security; United States Department of Justice; Federal Defender’s Office; U.S. District Court, Mi; Stephen J. Murphy, III; Craig A. Weier; S. Pierson, Lieutenant; Special Agent Donaldson; Special Agent Allen; Agent Terry; W. Malatinsky, Clinical Director; Chairman; Member; U.S. Marshal, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-6484
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 21, 2016
Decided: July 22, 2016
Duane Montgomery, Appellant Pro Se.
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Duane Montgomery appeals the district court's orders dismissing his civil action, denying his motions for entry of default and default judgment, and denying his motion to alter or amend judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court; Montgomery v. United States, No. 5:14-ct-03279-H (E.D.N.C. Mar. 7, & Mar. 31, 2016). We deny Montgomery's motions for transcript at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED