Case Name: Mark Anthony BARNES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. H.K. REVELEY, Jr., Attorney at Law, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-05-02
Citations: 520 F. App'x 218
Docket Number: No. 12-8098
Parties: Mark Anthony BARNES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. H.K. REVELEY, Jr., Attorney at Law, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before AGEE, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 520
Pages: 218–218

Head Matter:
Mark Anthony BARNES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. H.K. REVELEY, Jr., Attorney at Law, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 12-8098.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 23, 2013.
Decided: May 2, 2013.
Mark Anthony Barnes, Appellant Pro Se.
Before AGEE, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Mark Anthony Barnes appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Barnes v. Reveley, No. 1:12-cv-01365-LMB-JFA (E.D.Va. Nov. 30, 2012). We deny Barnes's motions to appoint counsel, to consider precedent authorities, and for damages. Finally, we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.