Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Charles Sprowal, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1994-10-06
Citations: 208 A.D.2d 367
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles Sprowal, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 208
Pages: 367–368

Head Matter:
(October 6, 1994)
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles Sprowal, Appellant.
[616 NYS2d 971]

Opinion:
Upon remittitur from the Court of Appeals (84 NY2d 113), judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Rena Uviller, J.), rendered June 15, 1989, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, for which he was sentenced as a second felony offender to a term of 4 Vi to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant was arrested in a buy and bust operation moments after and only a short distance from the sale. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People and giving due deference to the jury's findings of credibility, under the standards set forth in People v Bleakley (69 NY2d 490, 495), defendant's guilt was proven beyond a reasonable doubt by legally sufficient evidence and the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence.
Defendant failed to preserve his claim that the identification charge diminished the People's burden of proof (People v Thomas, 50 NY2d 467), and we decline to review in the interest of justice. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Rosenberger, Ellerin and Ross, JJ.