Case Name: Kevin PITTMAN, Petitioner v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2016-05-23
Citations: 137 A.3d 572
Docket Number: 
Parties: Kevin PITTMAN, Petitioner v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 137
Pages: 572–573

Head Matter:
Kevin PITTMAN, Petitioner v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
May 23, 2016.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 23rd day of May, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Did the Parole Board abuse its discretion by summarily denying petitioner credit against his maximum sentence for time that he spent at liberty on parole following his recommitment as a convicted parole violator?