Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Walter L. PENDERS and Flora Penders, Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1950-06-27
Citations: 182 F.2d 943
Docket Number: No. 12425
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Walter L. PENDERS and Flora Penders, Appellees.
Judges: Before BIGGS and STEPHENS, Circuit Judges, and DRIVER, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 182
Pages: 943–943

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Walter L. PENDERS and Flora Penders, Appellees.
No. 12425.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
June 27, 1950.
Frank J. Hennessy, U. S. Atty., Rudolph Scholz, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.
Eugene H. O’Donnell, Robert E. Halsing, San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.
Before BIGGS and STEPHENS, Circuit Judges, and DRIVER, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The questions presented by the appeal in the instant case are entirely those of fact. They have been resolved in favor of the appellees and against the United States after careful consideration by the learned trial judge. We can find no substantial error in the proceeding. Accordingly the judgment is affirmed.