Case Name: Arc Engineering Corporation, Respondent, v. The State of New York, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1944-11-16
Citations: 293 N.Y. 819
Docket Number: Claim No. 25495
Parties: Arc Engineering Corporation, Respondent, v. The State of New York, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 293
Pages: 819–820

Head Matter:
Arc Engineering Corporation, Respondent, v. The State of New York, Appellant.
(Claim No. 25495)
Argued October 10, 1944;
decided November 16, 1944.
Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney-General (Orri/n G. Judd, Ruth Toch and Saul A. Shames of counsel), for appellant.
Harry Kalman for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Claimant's failure to comply with provisions of a construction contract requiring notification of the Chief Engineer in writing before performance of work for which extra compensation was recovered in the Court of Claims is here asserted by the State as defeating any such recovery. Our examination of the record convinces us that this defense was not properly raised in the Court of Claims, where the case was tried upon another theory. No other question of law was presented for our consideration.
Accordingly the judgment should be affirmed, with costs. (See 294 N. Y. 656.)
Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacher, JJ., concur.
Judgment affirmed.