Case Name: In Re: Rodney Eugene SMITH, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-03-09
Citations: 315 F. App'x 456
Docket Number: No. 09-1106
Parties: In Re: Rodney Eugene SMITH, Petitioner.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 315
Pages: 456–456

Head Matter:
In Re: Rodney Eugene SMITH, Petitioner.
No. 09-1106.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 26, 2009.
Decided: March 9, 2009.
Rodney Eugene Smith, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Rodney Eugene Smith petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his petition for writ of error coram nobis. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find there has been no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.