Case Name: Peter J. McMAHON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. L.E. FLEMING, Warden, FMC Fort Worth, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-08-15
Citations: 145 F. App'x 887
Docket Number: No. 04-11084
Parties: Peter J. McMAHON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. L.E. FLEMING, Warden, FMC Fort Worth, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before SMITH, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 145
Pages: 887–888

Head Matter:
Peter J. McMAHON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. L.E. FLEMING, Warden, FMC Fort Worth, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 04-11084.
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Decided Aug. 15, 2005.
Peter J. McMahon, Fort Worth, TX, pro se.
Before SMITH, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Peter J. McMahon, federal prisoner # 06394-062, challenges the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, in which he argued that the Bureau of Prisons does not properly calculate good time credit, for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.
McMahon concedes that he did not exhaust administrative remedies. However, he asserts that the exhaustion requirement is not jurisdictional and that his failure to exhaust should be excused because exhaustion would be futile and would cause him irreparable harm. He further contends that the district court abused its discretion in failing to provide findings and conclusions in support of its dismissal. McMahon has not established that the district court abused its discretion in dismissing his petition for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. See Fuller v. Rich, 11 F.3d 61, 62 (5th Cir.1994). Accordingly, the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.