Case Name: The Durst Mfg. Co., Inc. v. United States; Hancock Gross Mfg. Co. et al. v. United States
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1967-03-15
Citations: 58 Cust. Ct. 871
Docket Number: No. P67/64; protests 61/6043, etc. (New York); No. P67/65; protests 61/12151, etc. (Philadelphia)
Parties: The Durst Mfg. Co., Inc. v. United States,
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Volume: 58
Pages: 871–871

Head Matter:
No. P67/64.
No. P67/65.
The Durst Mfg. Co., Inc. v. United States,
protests 61/6043, etc. (New York).
Hancock Gross Mfg. Co. et al. v. United States,
protests 61/12151, etc. (Philadelphia).

Opinion:
Ford, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of. brass strainers similar in all material respects to those the subject of Davies Turner & Company v. United States (55 Cust. Ct. 488, Abstract 69651), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.