Case Name: Daniel Joseph LANG, Petitioner-Appellant, v. J.W. HAMLET, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-09-28
Citations: 249 F. App'x 563
Docket Number: No. 04-16110
Parties: Daniel Joseph LANG, Petitioner-Appellant, v. J.W. HAMLET, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 249
Pages: 563–564

Head Matter:
Daniel Joseph LANG, Petitioner-Appellant, v. J.W. HAMLET, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 04-16110.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 24, 2007 .
Filed Sept. 28, 2007.
Daniel Joseph Lang, Corcoran, CA, pro se.
Pamela B. Hooley, Office of the California Attorney General, Department of Jus tice, Sacramento, CA, for Respondeni>-Ap-pellee.
Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Daniel Joseph Lang, a California state prisoner, appeals from the district court's judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review de novo a district court's decision to deny a § 2254 petition, Sass v. Cal. Bd. of Prison Terms, 461 F.3d 1123, 1126 (9th Cir.2006), and we affirm.
Lang contends that the California Board of Prison Terms' (the "Board") decision to deem him unsuitable for parole violated his due process rights. We conclude that the Board's decision was supported by some evidence in the record. See id. at 1128-29.
To the extent Lang challenges the validity of his guilty plea and asserts related errors, we deny a certificate of appealability with respect to such claims. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).
The parties' pending motions are denied.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.