Case Name: Deatonne D. JOHNSON, Movant/Respondent, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2009-05-26
Citations: 283 S.W.3d 310
Docket Number: No. ED 91968
Parties: Deatonne D. JOHNSON, Movant/Respondent, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Appellant.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 283
Pages: 310–311

Head Matter:
Deatonne D. JOHNSON, Movant/Respondent, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Appellant.
No. ED 91968.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
May 26, 2009.
Christopher A. Koster, Shaun J. Mackel-prang, Karen Louise Kramer, Jayne T. Woods, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent/Appellant.
Michelle Murphy Rivera, Saint Louis, MO, for Movant/Respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The State of Missouri appeals from the motion court's order and judgment granting of Deatonne D. Johnson's (Movant) amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 24.035. We have reviewed the bi*iefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for them use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).