Case Name: Thomas H. LUPO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, William Sirmans, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-05-25
Citations: 180 F. App'x 906
Docket Number: No. 06-10985
Parties: Thomas H. LUPO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, William Sirmans, Defendant.
Judges: Before TJOFLAT, CARNES and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 180
Pages: 906–906

Head Matter:
Thomas H. LUPO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, William Sirmans, Defendant.
No. 06-10985
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
May 25, 2006.
Grant G. Morain, Grant G. Morain, P.C., Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
William C. Thompson, Weissman, Nowack, Curry et al., Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before TJOFLAT, CARNES and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The sole question this appeal presents is whether triable issues of fact exist regarding the ownership/control of the railroad crossing where appellant was injured. The answer to the question is no, for the reasons stated in the district court's January 5, 2006 granting appellee summary judgment.
AFFIRMED.