Case Name: Julian F. WELTSCH, Appellant, v. Alan T. O'BRIEN and Barbara O'Brien, Appellees
Court: Arizona Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Arizona
Decision Date: 1975-12-18
Citations: 25 Ariz. App. 551
Docket Number: No. 1 CA-CIV 2667
Parties: Julian F. WELTSCH, Appellant, v. Alan T. O’BRIEN and Barbara O’Brien, Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Arizona Appeals Reports
Volume: 25
Pages: 551–552

Head Matter:
545 P.2d 62
Julian F. WELTSCH, Appellant, v. Alan T. O’BRIEN and Barbara O’Brien, Appellees.
No. 1 CA-CIV 2667.
Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B.
Dec. 18, 1975.
Review Denied Jan. 20, 1976.
Joseph B. Miller, Renaud, Cook, Miller & Cordova, P. A., Phoenix, for appellant. Stuart Herzog, Tucson, for appellees.

Opinion:
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR REHEARING AND CLARIFICATION OF PRIOR OPINION
JACOBSON, Presiding Judge.
The Court, consisting of Presiding Judge Eino M. Jacobson and Judges William E. Eubank and Levi Ray Haire, considered appellees' motion for rehearing and appellant's objection thereto. The motion for rehearing correctly points out that issues raised by the pleadings, that is, the falsity of the affidavit of garnishment and the constitutionality of post judgment garnishment statutes, were not litigated in the trial court nor determined on appeal. The fact that issues remain to be litigated is contrary to our directions for reversal and entering of judgment for the appellants. Therefore,
It is ordered that the last paragraph of our opinion, 540 P.2d 1269 at p. 1273, is modified to read as follows:
"The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the matter remanded for further proceedings on the remaining issues raised by the pleadings."
It is further ordered, that upon our opinion being so modified, appellees' motion for rehearing is denied.