Case Name: In the Matter of Carmen Montalvo, Petitioner, v. Barbara Blum et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1980-11-13
Citations: 78 A.D.2d 809
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Carmen Montalvo, Petitioner, v Barbara Blum et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 78
Pages: 809–809

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Carmen Montalvo, Petitioner, v Barbara Blum et al., Respondents.

Opinion:
In this transferred article 78 proceeding, the determination of respondent State Commissioner of Social Services dated October 26, 1979, which affirmed respondent New York City Commissioner of Social Services' determination to discontinue the grant of aid to petitioner's three minor children, is annulled, and the matter remanded to the commissioner, without costs. Three of the petitioner's minor children had been recipients of aid to dependent children, which was discontinued because of petitioner's failure to report employment and earned income. She failed to appear at a hearing on this matter, having been advised by her counsel not to appear. This failure to appear was contumacious, and any determination with respect to petitioner herself which would deny her benefits, would be warranted. However, with respect to the children and aid to families with dependent children grants such a determination would not be binding upon them. Their mother's failure to comply with respondent's request cannot serve to invalidate their basis for support. (King v Smith, 392 US 309; Matter of Gunn vBlum, 48 NY2d 58.) The matter is remanded for restoration of the AFDC grants to the children and to determine the amounts to which the children should be entitled, taking into consideration whatever income can properly be attributed to the mother. (Matter of Mitchell v Toia, 63 AD2d 890; see, also, Matter of Vailes v D'Elia, 77 AD2d 45.) We call to the attention of the commissioner of social services the fact, heretofore enunciated, that there must be compliance with the principle that the needs of indigent children are not to be neglected on the basis of their parents' dereliction. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Fein, Sandler, Sullivan and Bloom, JJ.