Case Name: Anthony S. FAIR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patrick CONROY; Attorney General of the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-07-05
Citations: 13 F. App'x 147
Docket Number: No. 01-6566
Parties: Anthony S. FAIR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patrick CONROY; Attorney General of the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 13
Pages: 147–147

Head Matter:
Anthony S. FAIR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patrick CONROY; Attorney General of the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 01-6566.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted June 21, 2001.
Decided July 5, 2001.
Anthony S. Fair, pro se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Celia Anderson Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, for appellees.
Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Anthony S. Fair seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Fair v. Conroy, No. CA-00-604 (D.Md. Mar. 29, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.