Case Name: Randall SALTERS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Mark HUGHES; Michael F. Easley, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-03-16
Citations: 5 F. App'x 316
Docket Number: No. 01-6037
Parties: Randall SALTERS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Mark HUGHES; Michael F. Easley, Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: Before DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 5
Pages: 316–317

Head Matter:
Randall SALTERS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Mark HUGHES; Michael F. Easley, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 01-6037.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 8, 2001.
Decided March 16, 2001.
Randall Salters, pro se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, NC, for appellees.
Before DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Randall Salters seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Salters v. Hughes, No. CA-00-170-MU-1 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 8, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.