Case Name: The City of Tacoma, Respondent, v. Ed Heinricy, Appellant
Court: Washington Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Washington
Decision Date: 1937-05-24
Citations: 190 Wash. 710
Docket Number: No. 26524
Parties: The City of Tacoma, Respondent, v. Ed Heinricy, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Washington Reports
Volume: 190
Pages: 710–710

Head Matter:
[No. 26524.
Department One.
May 24, 1937.]
The City of Tacoma, Respondent, v. Ed Heinricy, Appellant.
P. L. Pendleton and W. G. Palmer, for appellant.
Howard Carothers, Bartlett Rummel, and George F. Abel, for respondent.
Reported in 68 P. (2d) 1031.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The defendant was charged with violating ordinance No. 11190 of the city of Tacoma on the same occasion that gave rise to the prosecution in Tacoma v. Roe, ante p. 444, 68 P. (2d) 1028. On authority of that case, the judgment is affirmed.