Case Name: Paul Edward SELPH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-12-13
Citations: 554 So. 2d 19
Docket Number: No. 88-0028
Parties: Paul Edward SELPH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: HERSEY, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 554
Pages: 19–20

Head Matter:
Paul Edward SELPH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 88-0028.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Dec. 13, 1989.
Clarification Denied Jan. 24, 1990.
Kendall J. Phillips of Phillips and Gale, P.A., Fort Pierce, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Celia A. Terenzio, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant raises four points, two of which we conclude to be meritorious. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for new trial with direction to proceed in accordance herewith.
In brief, we conclude that it was error to admit the Williams rule evidence and not make more specific findings, which must be made on remand, of reliability of the videotape.
HERSEY, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.