Case Name: David Ramos ORLANDO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-10-23
Citations: 681 So. 2d 912
Docket Number: No. 96-868
Parties: David Ramos ORLANDO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and GERSTEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 681
Pages: 912–912

Head Matter:
David Ramos ORLANDO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 96-868.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 23, 1996.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Ada Manzano Avallone, Special Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Cynthia A. Greenfield, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and GERSTEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We find no merit in the defendant's contentions that certain comments made by the prosecutor vitiated his entire trial and therefore affirm on the basis of § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (1995); Holton v. State, 573 So.2d 284 (Fla.1990), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 960, 111 S.Ct. 2275,114 L.Ed.2d 726 (1991); Duest v. State, 462 So.2d 446 (Fla.1985); Irving v. State, 627 So.2d 92 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Hightower v. State, 592 So.2d 689 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Shaara v. State, 581 So.2d 1339 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).
However, the state concedes error as to the defendant's sentence for robbery, so we reverse that sentence and remand for resen-tencing in accord with section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1995).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part.