Case Name: SEBEL etc v. GUILFOYLE etc
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1930-05-12
Citations: 8 Ohio Law Abs. 427
Docket Number: No 3691
Parties: SEBEL etc v GUILFOYLE etc
Judges: Ross and Hamilton, JJ, concur.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 8
Pages: 427–428

Head Matter:
SEBEL etc v GUILFOYLE etc
Ohio Appeals, 1st Dist, Hamilton Co
No 3691.
Decided May 12, 1930
. Eugene & Sidney Adler and Bates, Stewart & Skirvin, all of Cincinnati, for Sebel
Matthews & Matthews and Anthony P. Conlon, all of Cincinnati, for Guilfoyle.

Opinion:
CUSHING, PJ.
The only question for the consideration of this Court is whether 8621 GC, applies to agreements made between real estate brokers with reference to the payment of commission.
The question before this court was considered by the Supreme Court of Ohio in the case of Cohen v. Spitz Co., 121 Ohio St., 1 (166 N. E. 804). In that case the Court held that the statute applied not only to oral agreements between owner and broker, but .also to those made between the broker and a third person.
Upon authority of the case of Cohen v. Spitz Co., supra, the judgment of the court of Common Pleas will be reversed, and the cause will be remanded to that court with instructions to enter judgment in favor of Samuel Sebel.
Ross and Hamilton, JJ, concur.