Case Name: David HIX, Claimant/Respondent, v. MARCHEM COATED FABRICS, INC., Employer/Appellant, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-11-02
Citations: 148 S.W.3d 859
Docket Number: No. ED 84322
Parties: David HIX, Claimant/Respondent, v. MARCHEM COATED FABRICS, INC., Employer/Appellant, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., BOOKER T. SHAW, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 148
Pages: 859–860

Head Matter:
David HIX, Claimant/Respondent, v. MARCHEM COATED FABRICS, INC., Employer/Appellant, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent.
No. ED 84322.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Nov. 2, 2004.
Rodney L. Washburn, Maryland Heights, MO, for appellant.
Ninion S. Riley, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., BOOKER T. SHAW, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
MarChem Coated Fabrics, Inc. appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's ("the Commission") decision to award David Hix ("Employee") unemployment compensation because it argues Employee was terminated due to misconduct connected with his work.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and no error of law appears. The Commission's decision is affirmed. No precedential or jurisprudential purposes would be served by an opinion restating the detailed facts and the principles of law. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).