Case Name: Rudolph HINES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1976-09-21
Citations: 338 So. 2d 61
Docket Number: No. 75-2021
Parties: Rudolph HINES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before PEARSON, HENDRY and HAV-ERFIELD, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 338
Pages: 61–62

Head Matter:
Rudolph HINES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 75-2021.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Sept. 21, 1976.
Rudolph Hines, in pro. per.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Margarita Esquiroz, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before PEARSON, HENDRY and HAV-ERFIELD, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant was the movant in a motion for relief pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850. This appeal is from a denial of the motion. The sole ground for relief presented to the trial court was that upon appellant's guilty pleas he was sentenced on two counts which were facets of the same transaction. Count one charged a breaking and entering of a dwelling with the intent to commit a felony. Count two charged an assault with intent to commit murder in the first degree. The offenses were clearly subject to separate sentences. See State v. Ray, 331 So.2d 316 (Fla.1976).
Affirmed.