Case Name: Arnold Milks et al., Respondents, v. David Walker et al., Appellants. (Action No. 1.); Arnold Milks et al., Respondents, v. Town of Boston, Appellant. (Action No. 2.)
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1962-09-13
Citations: 17 A.D.2d 756
Docket Number: 
Parties: Arnold Milks et al., Respondents, v. David Walker et al., Appellants. (Action No. 1.) Arnold Milks et al., Respondents, v. Town of Boston, Appellant. (Action No. 2.)
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 17
Pages: 756–756

Head Matter:
Arnold Milks et al., Respondents, v. David Walker et al., Appellants. (Action No. 1.) Arnold Milks et al., Respondents, v. Town of Boston, Appellant. (Action No. 2.)

Opinion:
Order insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed, without costs of this appeal to any party, and motion to discontinue denied, without costs. Memorandum: The granting of the motion to discontinue without prejudice was an improvident exercise of discretion. (Schultz v. Kobus, 15 A D 2d 382; Broniszewski v. Newman, 16 A D 2d 876.) (Appeal by all defendants from part of an order of Erie Special Term granting the motion of the plaintiffs for an order permitting the discontinuance of the above-entitled actions without prejudice.) Present—Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Halpern and Henry, JJ.