Case Name: George S. Gans, Respondent, v. Marvin G. Connally, Individually, Appellant, and Marvin G. Connally, Archibald H. Whan and Harry M. Smith, Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of A. H. Whan & Company, Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1929-03
Citations: 226 A.D. 673
Docket Number: 
Parties: George S. Gans, Respondent, v. Marvin G. Connally, Individually, Appellant, and Marvin G. Connally, Archibald H. Whan and Harry M. Smith, Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of A. H. Whan & Company, Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 226
Pages: 673–674

Head Matter:
George S. Gans, Respondent, v. Marvin G. Connally, Individually, Appellant, and Marvin G. Connally, Archibald H. Whan and Harry M. Smith, Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of A. H. Whan & Company, Defendants.

Opinion:
The decision of this court handed down on February 20, 1929, is hereby amended to read as follows: Order denying motion of defend ant Connally for a further bill of particulars reversed upon the law and the facts, without costs, and motion granted, without costs, to the extent of directing that plaintiff furnish particulars of the services that he claims were to be rendered by defendant Connally or the other defendants, of the services actually rendered, and of the years or periods covered by income taxes for which refunds were to be sought and were actually obtained. Defendant Connally is entitled to the particulars above mentioned. Lazansky, P.' J., Hagarty, Seeger, Carswell and Seudder, JJ., concur.
Reported in 225 App. Div. 897.— [Rep.