Case Name: STATE of Utah, in the interest of B.L.D., a person under eighteen years of age. B.L.D., Appellant, v. State of Utah, Appellee
Court: Utah Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Utah
Decision Date: 2015-04-09
Citations: 347 P.3d 1071
Docket Number: No. 20140494-CA
Parties: STATE of Utah, in the interest of B.L.D., a person under eighteen years of age. B.L.D., Appellant, v. State of Utah, Appellee.
Judges: Before Judges STEPHEN L. ROTH, JOHN A. PEARCE, and KATE A. TOOMEY.
Reporter: Pacific Reporter 3d
Volume: 347
Pages: 1071–1072

Head Matter:
2015 UT App 82
STATE of Utah, in the interest of B.L.D., a person under eighteen years of age. B.L.D., Appellant, v. State of Utah, Appellee.
No. 20140494-CA.
Court of Appeals of Utah.
April 9, 2015.
Monica Maio, Pamela L. Vickrey, and William R. Russell, Salt Lake City, for Appellant. f
Sean D. Reyes and Tera J. Peterson, for Appellee. «
Before Judges STEPHEN L. ROTH, JOHN A. PEARCE, and KATE A. TOOMEY.

Opinion:
Decision
PER CURIAM:
T1 B.L.D. appeals the juvenile court's dis-positional order imposing thirty days of detention as a result of an adjudication of curfew violation. This case is before the court on the State's motion for summary reversal and remand, which the State filed in lieu of a brief. We grant that motion.
12 B.L.D.'s appeal raises the single issue of whether the juvenile court erred in ordering thirty days of detention, suspended, following an adjudication 'of curfew violation because the curfew violation is an offense that is ineligible for detention. We review a trial court's interpretation of a statute for correctness. See State v. Graham, 2011 UT App 332, ¶ 14, 263 P.3d 569 ("Questions of statutory interpretation are matters of law, which we review for correctness."). The State concedes that the juvenile court erred by imposing detention for thirty days for a curfew violation, even if suspended, and agrees that the relief requested by B.L.D. on appeal should be granted.
T3 Under Utah law, a juvenile court may order detention only for "an act which if committed by an adult would be a criminal offense" or for "contempt of court." Utah Code Ann. § 78A-6-117(@)(F(i) (LexisNexis 2012). The curfew violation B.L.D. admitted is a juvenile status offense that applies only to a minor under the age of sixteen. See Davis County Code § 9.08.010 ("It is unlawful for any minor under the age of sixteen .(16) years to be in or on any public street, park, square or any public place between the hours of eleven p.m. and daylight."). Because detention may only be ordered after adjudication for "an act which if committed by an adult would be a criminal offense" or for "contempt of court", the juvenile court erred in ordering thirty days of detention, suspended.
14 Accordingly, we grant the State's motion to reverse the juvenile court's disposi-tional order committing B.L.D. to detention for thirty days, suspended, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this decision.
. A juvenile status offense is a violation of the law that would not be a violation "but for the age of the offender." Utah Admin. Code R547-13-3(2).
. In response to the State's motion, B.L.D. requests that the juvenile court also be directed to "delete any and all references to the order of stayed detention in CARE." While we decline to direct the juvenile court on this matter, the relief may be sought from the juvenile court in the proceedings after remand.