Case Name: VINH VU, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2019-06-11
Citations: 576 S.W.3d 615
Docket Number: No. ED 106801
Parties: VINH VU, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 576
Pages: 615–615

Head Matter:
VINH VU, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 106801
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Filed: June 11, 2019
FOR APPELLANT: Kevin L. Schriener, 141 N. Meramec Avenue, Suite 314, Clayton, MO 63105.
FOR RESPONDENT: Eric S. Schmitt, Attorney General, Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.
Before Roy L. Richter, P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Vinh Vu appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).