Case Name: Darren ISOM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-04-18
Citations: 578 So. 2d 431
Docket Number: No. 90-1546
Parties: Darren ISOM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ„ concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 578
Pages: 431–432

Head Matter:
Darren ISOM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 90-1546.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
April 18, 1991.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and James R. Wulchak, Chief, Appellate Division, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Belle B. Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm on the authority of Walker v. State, 546 So.2d 764 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989) and Flowers v. State, 567 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). We certify to the supreme court the following question:
IS IT THE INTENT OF THE FLORIDA SENTENCING GUIDELINES THAT LEGAL CONSTRAINT POINTS UNDER RULE 3.701d.6. BE ASSESSED FOR EACH OFFENSE COMMITTED WHILE THE DEFENDANT WAS UNDER LEGAL CONSTRAINT?
DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ" concur.
COWART, J., dissents with opinion.