Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Quinton Leon SUTTON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-01-16
Citations: 85 F. App'x 897
Docket Number: No. 03-7406
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Petitioner—Appellee, v. Quinton Leon SUTTON, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before LUTTIG, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 85
Pages: 897–898

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Petitioner—Appellee, v. Quinton Leon SUTTON, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 03-7406.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 18, 2003.
Decided Jan. 16, 2004.
Quinton Leon Sutton, Appellant pro se.
Sandra Jane Hairston, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before LUTTIG, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Quinton Leon Sutton appeals the district court's order affirming the magistrate judge's order denying Sutton's motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion to compel discovery. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Sutton, No. CR-98-355 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 6, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED