Case Name: Cedric Garth BRUTON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1969-03-11
Citations: 220 So. 2d 669
Docket Number: No. 68-704
Parties: Cedric Garth BRUTON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 220
Pages: 669–670

Head Matter:
Cedric Garth BRUTON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 68-704.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
March 11, 1969.
Rehearing Denied April 18, 1969.
Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender, and Robert L. Parks, Special Asst. Public Defender, Judge.
Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Melvin Grossman, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By this appeal the defendant seeks review of an adverse judgment of conviction in a non-jury cause, with sentence accordingly.
One witness positively identified the appellant as the perpetrator of the crime; others were not certain that he was the one and they were in conflict as to his apparel. One other witness did indicate that the perpetrator was of the same general size as the appellant.
The judgment of conviction arrived in this court with a presumption of correctness. Crum v. State, Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 24; Nelson v. State, Fla.App. 1968, 208 So.2d 506; Gilroy v. State, Fla.App.1968, 212 So.2d 823. Our duty is to examine the record to see if there is sub stantial competent evidence to support the finding's of the trier of the facts. There being such in this record, we affirm. The Supreme Court of Florida has specifically held that positive identification by one witness is sufficient to support a conviction. State v. Sebastian, Fla.1965, 171 So.2d 893.
Therefore, the judgment of conviction and sentence here under review be and the same is hereby affirmed.
Affirmed.