Case Name: Application of M. T. BROWN and C. V. Hoke, Protested by Chester E. Barnett, File P-795. Chester E. BARNETT, Appellant, Cross-Appellee, v. M. T. BROWN and C. V. Hoke, Appellees, S. E. Reynolds, State Engineer of the State of New Mexico, Respondent, Cross-Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of New Mexico
Jurisdiction: New Mexico
Decision Date: 1956-10-18
Citations: 61 N.M. 471
Docket Number: No. 6105
Parties: Application of M. T. BROWN and C. V. Hoke, Protested by Chester E. Barnett, File P-795. Chester E. BARNETT, Appellant, Cross-Appellee, v. M. T. BROWN and C. V. Hoke, Appellees, S. E. Reynolds, State Engineer of the State of New Mexico, Respondent, Cross-Appellant.
Judges: COMPTON, C. J., and LUJAN and KIKER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: New Mexico Reports
Volume: 61
Pages: 471–473

Head Matter:
302 P.2d 735
Application of M. T. BROWN and C. V. Hoke, Protested by Chester E. Barnett, File P-795. Chester E. BARNETT, Appellant, Cross-Appellee, v. M. T. BROWN and C. V. Hoke, Appellees, S. E. Reynolds, State Engineer of the State of New Mexico, Respondent, Cross-Appellant.
No. 6105.
Supreme Court of New Mexico.
Oct. 18, 1956.
Morgan & Morgan, Portales, Smith & Smith, Fred C. Tharp, Clovis, for appellant and cross-appellee.
Richard H. Robinson, Atty. Gen., Charles D. Harris and Jack L. Love, Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen., for respondent and cross-appellant.
Hartley & Buzzard, Clovis, for appellees.

Opinion:
McGILEE, Justice.
As this appeal is presented to us, the issues are precisely the same as those raised and passed upon in our decision filed August 15, 1956, in the appeal styled: In the matter of the Application of Sam Johnson, Protested by Chester Plummer, H. L. McCrary, C. A. Tevis and H. J. McCrary, File P-1287. Chester Plummer, et al., v. Sam Johnson and S. E. Reynolds, State Engineer of the State of New Mexico, our docket No. 6113, which decision controls disposition of this appeal.
The judgment of the lower court is reversed with direction to the trial court to reinstate the case upon its docket and to proceed in accordance herewith under the aforesaid decision.
It is so ordered.
COMPTON, C. J., and LUJAN and KIKER, JJ., concur.