Case Name: Granville Stuart, Plaintiff in Error, v. Samuel T. Hauser et al.
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1906-12-03
Citations: 203 U.S. 585
Docket Number: No. 60
Parties: Granville Stuart, Plaintiff in Error, v. Samuel T. Hauser et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 203
Pages: 585–585

Head Matter:
No. 60.
Granville Stuart, Plaintiff in Error, v. Samuel T. Hauser et al.
Argued November 15, 1906.
Decided December 3, 1906.
Mr. George B. Colby and Mr. Charles W. Dayton for plaintiff in error. Mr. S. M. Stockslager and Mr. W. E. Borah for defendants in error.

Opinion:
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Idaho.
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Swafford v. Templeton, 185 U. S. 487; Butler v. Gage, 138 U. S. 52; Home for Incurables v. City of New York, 187 U. S. 155; Erie Railroad Company v. Purdy, 185 U. S. 148; Ansbro v. United States, 159 U. S. 695; Cornell v. Creen, 163 U. S. 75; Bausman v. Dixon, 173 U. S. 113; Gableman v. Peoria &c. Railway Company, 179 U. S. 335; City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Water Company, 142 U. S. 79; Beals v. Cone, 188 U. S. 184; Speed v. McCarthy, 181 U. S. 269. Case below, 9 Idaho, 53.