Case Name: In re the MARRIAGE OF Larry S. HAYES and Natalia M. Hayes Larry S. Hayes, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Natalia M. Hayes, Respondent/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2010-10-26
Citations: 323 S.W.3d 457
Docket Number: No. ED 93940
Parties: In re the MARRIAGE OF Larry S. HAYES and Natalia M. Hayes Larry S. Hayes, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Natalia M. Hayes, Respondent/Appellant.
Judges: Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., EATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 323
Pages: 457–458

Head Matter:
In re the MARRIAGE OF Larry S. HAYES and Natalia M. Hayes Larry S. Hayes, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Natalia M. Hayes, Respondent/Appellant.
No. ED 93940.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Oct. 26, 2010.
Charles E. Stine, Jr., Hannibal, MO, for respondent.
Molly M. Jones, Christan E. Shelton, Bryan Cave LLP, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., EATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Mother, Natalia M. Hayes, appeals from that part of a dissolution decree that awarded sole legal and physical custody to father. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).