Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Arlando M. VAIL, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-04-17
Citations: 364 S.W.3d 267
Docket Number: No. ED 96456
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Arlando M. VAIL, Appellant.
Judges: KURT S. ODENWALD, C.J., PATRICIA L. COHEN, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 364
Pages: 267–268

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Arlando M. VAIL, Appellant.
No. ED 96456.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
April 17, 2012.
Edward S. Thompson, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jennifer A. Wideman, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
KURT S. ODENWALD, C.J., PATRICIA L. COHEN, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Arlando Vail (Defendant) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis convicting him of second-degree burglary and possession of burglar's tools. Defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his request to question two members of the jury who saw him shackled regarding their ability to give him a fair trial.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court's decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).