Case Name: Otto HENNING and Carter Carburetor Corporation, Appellants, v. Clarence H. JORGENSEN, Clarence H. Jorgensen, Administrator, and General Motors Corporation, Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1950-01-26
Citations: 180 F.2d 353
Docket Number: No. 13969
Parties: Otto HENNING and Carter Carburetor Corporation, Appellants, v. Clarence H. JORGENSEN, Clarence H. Jorgensen, Administrator, and General Motors Corporation, Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 180
Pages: 353–353

Head Matter:
Otto HENNING and Carter Carburetor Corporation, Appellants, v. Clarence H. JORGENSEN, Clarence H. Jorgensen, Administrator, and General Motors Corporation, Appellees.
No. 13969.
United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.
Jan. 26, 1950.
Rehearing Denied March 31, 1950.
Hugh M. Morris, Wilmington, Del. (Bertram H. Mann, Jr., and George R. Ericson, St. Louis, Mo., on the brief), for appellants.
John H. Bruninga, St. Louis, Mo. (Alex F. Baillio, Detroit, Mich., on the brief), for appellees.
Before SANBORN, WOODROUGH and RIDDICK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
WOODROUGH, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is taken from a suit brought under Revised Statutes, Sec. 4915, Title 35 U.S.C.A. § 63, to authorize the Commissioner of Patents to issue a patent embodied in the claim which was the subject matter of an interference proceeding before the Patent Office, to the General Motors Corporation, assignee of the appellees, Clarence H. Jorgensen and Clarence PI. Jorgensen, Administrator.
The appeal was consolidated with that of Ericson et al. v. Jorgensen et al., 8 Cir., 180 F.2d 180, in which an opinion has been filed this day. The decision in the Ericson case is applicable to this case as the same questions are involved.
For the reasons stated in the opinion in the Ericson case the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
Affirmed.