Case Name: Darryl Robert RAY, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Theoda E. MILLS, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-05-09
Citations: 366 S.W.3d 84
Docket Number: No. ED 96921
Parties: Darryl Robert RAY, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Theoda E. MILLS, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 366
Pages: 84–84

Head Matter:
Darryl Robert RAY, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Theoda E. MILLS, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 96921.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
May 9, 2012.
Darryl Robert Ray, St. Louis, MO, Acting pro se.
Theoda E. Mills, St. Louis, MO, Acting pro se.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Theoda E. Mills (Appellant) appeals from the trial court's judgment entered after a trial de novo awarding Darryl Robert Ray damages in the amount of $1,639.53 ($1,387.53 in medical and $258 in property) against Appellant and denying Appellant's counterclaim. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and did not erroneously declare or misapply the law. 6226 Northwood Condominium Ass'n v. Dwyer, 330 S.W.3d 504, 505 (Mo.App. E.D.2010). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).