Case Name: Christopher TONER, Petitioner v. The TRAVELERS HOME AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2016-09-08
Citations: 638 Pa. 631
Docket Number: No. 170 WAL 2016
Parties: Christopher TONER, Petitioner v. The TRAVELERS HOME AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondents
Judges: 
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 638
Pages: 631–631

Head Matter:
158 A.3d 64
Christopher TONER, Petitioner v. The TRAVELERS HOME AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondents
No. 170 WAL 2016
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
September 8, 2016

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 8th day of September, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:
Whether the Superior Court correctly determined that an insured, who signed a UM7UIM stacking waiver at the inception of a single vehicle policy, was not entitled to stack UM/UIM benefits, even though the carrier failed to obtain stacking waivers when second and third vehicles were added to the policy?