Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Damian Young, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2015-02-11
Citations: 125 A.D.3d 795
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Damian Young, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 125
Pages: 795–795

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Damian Young, Appellant.
[999 NYS2d 762]

Opinion:
Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ingram, J.), imposed January 22, 2013, upon his conviction of robbery in the third degree, upon a jury verdict.
Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.
The resentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Further, we reject the defendant's contention that the resentence should be reduced in the interest of justice (cf. People v Cuaran, 261 AD2d 169, 169 [1999]).
Balkin, J.P., Dickerson, Leventhal, Miller and LaSalle, JJ., concur.