Case Name: Joy D. TUCKER, Appellant, v. Raymond E. LANGE, Jr., Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-09-30
Citations: 117 S.W.3d 731
Docket Number: No. ED 81947
Parties: Joy D. TUCKER, Appellant, v. Raymond E. LANGE, Jr., Respondent.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J. and MARY R. RUSSELL, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 117
Pages: 731–731

Head Matter:
Joy D. TUCKER, Appellant, v. Raymond E. LANGE, Jr., Respondent.
No. ED 81947.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Sept. 30, 2003.
C. Clifford Schwartz, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
James W. Whitney, Jr., Clayton, MO, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J. and MARY R. RUSSELL, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Joy D. Tucker ("plaintiff"), appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County in favor of respondent, Raymond E. Lange ("defendant"). In this bench-tried case, plaintiff sued defendant for fraud in the inducement and breach of contract. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.