Case Name: Jerel SHAW, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARAMARK MANAGEMENT SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-04-01
Citations: 516 F. App'x 269
Docket Number: No. 12-2344
Parties: Jerel SHAW, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARAMARK MANAGEMENT SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 516
Pages: 269–269

Head Matter:
Jerel SHAW, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARAMARK MANAGEMENT SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 12-2344.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 28, 2018.
Decided: April 1, 2013.
Jerel Shaw, Appellant Pro Se. Katherine Lee Hoekman, Morgan Lewis & Bockius, LLP, Washington, DC, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jerel Shaw appeals the district court's order denying relief on his employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Shaw v. Aramark Mgmt. Servs. Ltd. P'ship, No. 3:11-cv-00483-REP, 903 F.Supp.2d 413 (E.D.Va. Oct. 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.