Case Name: McCoy, Appellee, v. Western Reserve Mutual Lightning Rod Mutual Insurance Company, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1994-10-05
Citations: 70 Ohio St. 3d 488
Docket Number: No. 93-1882
Parties: McCoy, Appellee, v. Western Reserve Mutual Lightning Rod Mutual Insurance Company, Appellant.
Judges: A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 70
Pages: 488–489

Head Matter:
McCoy, Appellee, v. Western Reserve Mutual Lightning Rod Mutual Insurance Company, Appellant.
[Cite as McCoy v. W. Res. Mut. Lightning Rod Mut. Ins. Co. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 488.]
(No. 93-1882
Submitted August 31, 1994
Decided October 5, 1994.)
Dyer, Garofalo, Mann & Schultz, Ronald E. Schultz and Kimberly K. Harshbarger, for appellee.
Pickrel, Schaeffer & Ebeling, Andrew C. Storar and L. Michael Bly, for appellant.
Scanlon & Henretta Co., L.P.A., J. Thomas Henretta and Ann Marie O’Brien, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers.
Mark J. Huller and Lisa A. Love, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Cincinnati Insurance Company.
Olds, Lynett & Bradshaw Co., L.P.A., and John J. Lynett, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Ohio Insurance Institute.

Opinion:
The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Martin v. Midwestern Group Ins. Co. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 478, 639 N.E.2d 438, decided today.
A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Moyer, C.J., concurs separately.
Wright, J., dissents for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinions in Martin v. Midwestern Group Ins. Co. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 478, 485-486, 639 N.E.2d 438, 443.