Case Name: Fortieth Street and Fairmount Avenue Church of God v. Hawes, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1970-03-20
Citations: 437 Pa. 407
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 392
Parties: Fortieth Street and Fairmount Avenue Church of God v. Hawes, Appellant.
Judges: Before Bell, C. J., Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O’Brien, Roberts and Pomeroy,- JJ. - ■
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 437
Pages: 407–408

Head Matter:
Fortieth Street and Fairmount Avenue Church of God v. Hawes, Appellant.
Argued January 28, 1970.
Before Bell, C. J., Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O’Brien, Roberts and Pomeroy,- JJ. - ■
Harold L. Randolph, with him Nine, Randolph & Watson, for appellant.
Herman Blumenthal, with him Fine, Stand, Silver-man a/nd Grossman, for appellees.
March 20, 1970:

Opinion:
Opinion
Per Curiam,
This is an appeal from a final decree in equity entered in the court below on April 23, 1969. The ap: peal was filed in this Court on April 25, 1969, but an examination of the record discloses that the writ of certiorari issued by this Court was not lodged in the court below until January 16, 1970. Under such circumstances, the appeal must be quashed.
An appeal, other than that filed under the Act of March 5, 1925, P. L. 23, 12 P.S. § §672-675, must be perfected within a reasonable time: Matthews Estate, 431 Pa. 616, 246 A. 2d 412 (1968); Hodge v. Me-Bee Co., Inc., 429 Pa. 585, 240 A. 2d 818 (1968); Fenerty Disbarment Case, 356 Pa. 614, 52 A. 2d 576 (1947), cert. denied, 332 U.S. 773, 68 S. Ct. 89 (1947). And the Act of May 19, 1897, P. L. 67, §2, 12 P.S. §1134, specifically provides that an appeal is not perfected until the writ of certiorari is filed in the court below.
In Matthews Estate, supra, we ruled that an appeal perfected eight and one-half months after it was filed was not perfected within a "reasonable time." In other cases, wherein even a shorter period of time elapsed between the entry of the appeal and the lodging of the writ in the lower court, we also ruled that the appeal was not perfected within a "reasonable time." See Hodge v. Me-Bee Co., Inc., supra, [six months]; Fenerty Disbarment Case, supra, [four months]; and Dziengielewski v. Dickson City School District, 314 Pa. 24, 170 A. 268 (1934) [two months].
In view of the above authorities, it is clear that the instant appeal was not perfected within the required period and, therefore, must be quashed.
It is so ordered. Each side to pay own costs.
An appeal filed under the Act of March 5, 1925, P. L. 23, 12 P.S. §672-675, must be taken and perfected within fifteen days from the date the order appealed from is entered: Scientific Living, Inc. v. Hohensee, 427 Pa. 320, 235 A. 2d 393 (1967).