Case Name: TRANSCO LEASING CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants; FIRST WICHITA NATIONAL BANK, et al., Appellants-Appellees, v. Brenda MANUEL, as Executor of the Estate of Wayne Manuel, Et Al., Cynthia Manuel Ahart, individually and as administratrix of the estate of Steven R. Ahart, et al., United States of America, American Excess Underwriters, Inc., Cynthia Manuel Ahart, as Succession Representative and Curatrix of the Estate of Steven R. Ahart, Standard Fittings Corporation, and Transco Leasing Corporation, Appellees-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1990-06-12
Citations: 905 F.2d 61
Docket Number: No. 88-1823
Parties: TRANSCO LEASING CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants. FIRST WICHITA NATIONAL BANK, et al., Appellants-Appellees, v. Brenda MANUEL, as Executor of the Estate of Wayne Manuel, Et Al., Cynthia Manuel Ahart, individually and as administratrix of the estate of Steven R. Ahart, et al., United States of America, American Excess Underwriters, Inc., Cynthia Manuel Ahart, as Succession Representative and Curatrix of the Estate of Steven R. Ahart, Standard Fittings Corporation, and Transco Leasing Corporation, Appellees-Appellants.
Judges: Before LIVELY , JOLLY, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 905
Pages: 61–61

Head Matter:
TRANSCO LEASING CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants. FIRST WICHITA NATIONAL BANK, et al., Appellants-Appellees, v. Brenda MANUEL, as Executor of the Estate of Wayne Manuel, Et Al., Cynthia Manuel Ahart, individually and as administratrix of the estate of Steven R. Ahart, et al., United States of America, American Excess Underwriters, Inc., Cynthia Manuel Ahart, as Succession Representative and Curatrix of the Estate of Steven R. Ahart, Standard Fittings Corporation, and Transco Leasing Corporation, Appellees-Appellants.
No. 88-1823.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
June 12, 1990.
Circuit Judge of the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING
(Opinion March 26, 1990, 5th Cir. 896 F.2d 1435)
Before LIVELY , JOLLY, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
IT IS ORDERED that the petition for panel rehearing filed by the United States is hereby DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitions for panel rehearing filed by Mrs. Ahart and Mrs. Manuel are granted in part. The mandate of this court is hereby amended to authorize the award of post-judgment interest pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961 and 31 U.S.C. § 1304(b)(1)(A). See Brooks v. United States, 757 F.2d 734, 740-41 (5th Cir.1985). In all other respects, the petitions for panel rehearing filed by Mrs. Ahart and Mrs. Manuel are DENIED.