Case Name: Integrity Trust Co. v. Taylor et al.
Court: Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1932-10-18
Citations: 17 Pa. D. & C. 721
Docket Number: No. 1; No. 5027
Parties: Integrity Trust Co. v. Taylor et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Pennsylvania District and County Reports
Volume: 17
Pages: 721–721

Head Matter:
Integrity Trust Co. v. Taylor et al.
No. 1
John Stokes Adams, for plaintiff; Francis Shunk Brown, for defendant.
Wolf, Block, Schorr & Solis-Cohen, for garnishee.
October 18, 1932.

Opinion:
Parry, J.,
— The writ of attachment cannot be -quashed as no irregularity appears on the face of the record. Nor does it appear that the attachment can now be dissolved on the ground that the fund attached is of the character entitled to the protection of the Act of April 15,1845, P. L. 459. We think the application premature, as the plaintiff cannot be summarily deprived of either the right to interrogate the garnishee or to have a jury pass upon disputed questions of fact that may arise.
The rule to show cause why the writ of attachment should not be quashed or dissolved is continued pending the filing of interrogatories.