Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. FLORENCIO ANDRADE-TORRES, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1991-10-02
Citations: 109 Or. App. 153
Docket Number: C900254CR; CA A65847
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. FLORENCIO ANDRADE-TORRES, Appellant.
Judges: Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Joseph, Chief Judge, and Deits, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 109
Pages: 153–154

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted August 14,
reversed and remanded with instructions to dismiss indictment October 2, 1991
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. FLORENCIO ANDRADE-TORRES, Appellant.
(C900254CR; CA A65847)
817 P2d 296
David E. Groom, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.
Jas. Adams, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.
Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Joseph, Chief Judge, and Deits, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant was indicted for delivery of a controlled substance and possession of a controlled substance as ' 'part of a drug cultivation, manufacture or delivery scheme or network." He demurred to the indictment. The demurrer was overruled. His motion to suppress evidence was denied, and he was convicted of both charges.
The court erred by overruling the demurrer. State v. Moeller, 105 Or App 434, 806 P2d 130, rev allowed 311 Or 349, rev dismissed 312 Or 76, 815 P2d 701 (1991). Because the demurrer should have been granted, the other claims of error are moot.
Reversed and remanded with instructions to dismiss indictment.