Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jessie A. BANDIN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-03-14
Citations: 171 F. App'x 61
Docket Number: No. 04-10643
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jessie A. BANDIN, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: CANBY, BEEZER and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 171
Pages: 61–61

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jessie A. BANDIN, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 04-10643.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 8, 2006.
Decided March 14, 2006.
Sharon K. Sexton, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Michael S. Reeves, Esq., Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: CANBY, BEEZER and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Jessie A. Bandin appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 41-month sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Bandin has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Bandin has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.
We dismiss in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2000) (stating that an appeal waiver is valid when it is entered into knowingly and voluntarily); see also United States v. Cardenas, 405 F.3d 1046, 1048 (9th Cir.2005) (holding that the changes in sentencing law imposed by United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), did not render waiver of appeal involuntary and unknowing).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.