Case Name: In the Matter of A. Walter Sildar et al., Appellants, v. Board of Trustees of the Village of Huntington Bay et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1982-10-21
Citations: 57 N.Y.2d 934
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of A. Walter Sildar et al., Appellants, v Board of Trustees of the Village of Huntington Bay et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 57
Pages: 934–936

Head Matter:
In the Matter of A. Walter Sildar et al., Appellants, v Board of Trustees of the Village of Huntington Bay et al., Respondents.
Decided October 21, 1982
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Charles T. Matthews for appellants.
Richard C. Cahn, Village Attorney, for Board of Trustees of Village of Huntington Bay, respondent.
Edgar Hills for Lawrence Mercantini and another, respondents.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs. On the record before us it cannot be said that the Board of Trustees of the Village of Huntington Bay, acting in its capacity as the village planning board, acted arbitrarily or capriciously, or abused its discretion under the restrictive covenant.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.