Case Name: Avon Products, Inc., Appellant, v. Sheldon H. Solow, Doing Business as Solow Building Company, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1981-06-18
Citations: 54 N.Y.2d 637
Docket Number: 
Parties: Avon Products, Inc., Appellant, v Sheldon H. Solow, Doing Business as Solow Building Company, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 54
Pages: 637–639

Head Matter:
Avon Products, Inc., Appellant, v Sheldon H. Solow, Doing Business as Solow Building Company, Respondent.
Decided June 18, 1981
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Herbert M. Wachtell, Peter D. McKenna and Richard B. Skaff for appellant.
Joel M. Miller, Robert J. McDonald, Martin D. Edel and Arline Mann for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On summary consideration, order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative. The arbitration clause at issue is broad enough to embrace all disputes concerning the correctness of the rental increase notice given by defendant to plaintiff.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Meyer. Taking no part: Judge Fuchsberg.