Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Daniel Miller, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1988-07-07
Citations: 142 A.D.2d 970
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Daniel Miller, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 142
Pages: 970–971

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Daniel Miller, Appellant.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed. Memorandum: On this record we cannot determine whether defendant would have been successful if his counsel had made a speedy trial motion (see, CPL 30.30). Defendant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, because of defense counsel's failure to make a motion to dismiss the indictment for noncompliance with the statutory speedy trial requirement, may properly be the subject of a motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 (1) (h) (see, People v Williams, 140 AD2d 969).
All concur, except Callahan, J. P., who dissents and votes to reverse and dismiss the indictment in the following memorandum.