Case Name: Sherry WHITE-BATTLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF VIRGINIA; Norfolk City Democratic Committee; George Schaefer; Norfolk Electoral Board, Defendants-Appellees, Elisa Long, General Registrar of the City of Norfolk; Eileen M. Addison, Movants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-12-20
Citations: 158 F. App'x 447
Docket Number: No. 05-1932
Parties: Sherry WHITE-BATTLE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF VIRGINIA; Norfolk City Democratic Committee; George Schaefer; Norfolk Electoral Board, Defendants—Appellees, Elisa Long, General Registrar of the City of Norfolk; Eileen M. Addison, Movants.
Judges: Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 158
Pages: 447–448

Head Matter:
Sherry WHITE-BATTLE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF VIRGINIA; Norfolk City Democratic Committee; George Schaefer; Norfolk Electoral Board, Defendants—Appellees, Elisa Long, General Registrar of the City of Norfolk; Eileen M. Addison, Movants.
No. 05-1932.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 15, 2005.
Decided Dec. 20, 2005.
Sherry White-Battle, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Edward Heretick, First Virginia Bank Building, Portsmouth, Virginia; Robert Bryan Rigney, A. Christopher Zaleski, Protogyrou & Rigney, PLC, Norfolk, Virginia; Samuel Lawrence Dumville, Norris & St. Clair, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Melvin Wayne Ringer, City Attorney’s Office, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Sherry White-Battle appeals the district court's order denying her second motion to amend her complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See White-Battle v. Democratic Party of Virginia, 323 F.Supp.2d 696 (E.D.Va.2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.