Case Name: Henry M. BURGESS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-07-18
Citations: 533 F. App'x 271
Docket Number: No. 13-1344
Parties: Henry M. BURGESS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 533
Pages: 271–272

Head Matter:
Henry M. BURGESS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 13-1344.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 10, 2013.
Decided: July 18, 2013.
Henry M. Burgess, Jr., Appellant pro se.
Diana Sarju Kim, John Thomas Murray, Seyfarth Shaw, LLP, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee.
Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Henry M. Burgess, Jr. appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to the Defendant in his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Burgess v. Costco Wholesale, No. 4:10-cv-01678-RBH, 2013 WL 645982 (D.S.C. Feb. 21, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.