Case Name: STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Lloyd CLAYTON and Martin Dudot, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1987-11-25
Citations: 517 So. 2d 40
Docket Number: No. 4-86-2242
Parties: STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Lloyd CLAYTON and Martin Dudot, Appellees.
Judges: HERSEY, C.J., and DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 517
Pages: 40–40

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Lloyd CLAYTON and Martin Dudot, Appellees.
No. 4-86-2242.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Nov. 25, 1987.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 8, 1988.
Robert A. Butterworth, Jr., Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Amy L. Diem, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Michael H. Tarkoff of Flynn and Tar-koff, Miami, for appellee-Lloyd Clayton.
Jane D. Fishman and Paul Stark, Plantation, for appellee-Martin Dudot.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The state appeals the dismissal of an information based on the trial court's finding of selective enforcement and other alleged misconduct on the part of the state. We reverse because the record does not support such a finding of selective enforcement or other misconduct. The appellees have failed to show that they were prosecuted because of an unjustifiable or arbitrary classification or that they were singled out for prosecution. Bell v. State, 369 So.2d 932 (Fla.1979); United States v. Greene, 697 F.2d 1229 (5th Cir.1983).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
HERSEY, C.J., and DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.