Case Name: KATZ v. LOTT
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1912-01-26
Citations: 133 N.Y.S. 1128
Docket Number: 
Parties: KATZ v. LOTT.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 133
Pages: 1128–1128

Head Matter:
KATZ v. LOTT.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
January 26, 1912.)
Appeal from Trial Term, New York County. Action by Solomon Katz., an infant, against Charles H. Lott. From a judgment on a verdict directed for defendant, and from an order denying a motion for new trial, plaintiff appeals. Reversed, and new trial ordered.
L. F. Fish, for appellant.
George Hahn, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We think that there was a question of fact for the jury, and that upon the evidence the learned trial judge was not justified in directing a verdict for the defendant. The judgment and order appealed from should be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
McLaughlin, j., dissents.