Case Name: Christopher ENOCH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1994-07-15
Citations: 639 So. 2d 196
Docket Number: No. 93-1591
Parties: Christopher ENOCH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: GOSHORN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 639
Pages: 196–196

Head Matter:
Christopher ENOCH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 93-1591.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
July 15, 1994.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Kenneth Witts, Asst. Public Defender, Day-tona Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
DAUKSCH, Judge.
This is an appeal from a sentence wherein a juvenile was given an adult sentence. We vacate the sentence because it fails to follow the mandate of section 39.059(7)(c), Florida Statutes (1991). See Troutman v. State, 630 So.2d 528 (Fla.1993); McCoy v. State, 632 So.2d 181 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).
SENTENCE VACATED, REMANDED.
GOSHORN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.