Case Name: Moses Tanenbaum et al., App'lts, v. Simon Feist, Resp't
Court: New York City Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1893-05-09
Citations: 52 N.Y. St. Rep. 941
Docket Number: 
Parties: Moses Tanenbaum et al., App'lts, v. Simon Feist, Resp't.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 52
Pages: 941–941

Head Matter:
Moses Tanenbaum et al., App'lts, v. Simon Feist, Resp't.
Appeal from judgment entered on verdict in favor of defendant.
Benno Loewy, for app’lts; Howe & Hummel, for resp’t.

Opinion:
Ehrlich, Ch. J.
The action, instead of being for damages resulting from
the breach of a special contract, was to recover for moneys paid, laid out and expended for the defendant, at his request.
There was no proof of any direction from the defendant to pay the money, and no warrant for a recovery on any such cause of action. The exceptions taken are without merit.
The plaintiff having failed to submit to a nonsuit, the direction to find for the defendant was right, and the judgment entered on the verdict must be affirmed, with costs.
Newburger, J., concurs.