Case Name: Craig BONNETT, Appellant, v. CHRISTIAN HOSPITAL NORTHEAST-NORTHWEST and Village North, Inc., Respondents.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2019-02-26
Citations: 575 S.W.3d 279
Docket Number: No. ED 106625
Parties: Craig BONNETT, Appellant,
v.
CHRISTIAN HOSPITAL NORTHEAST-NORTHWEST and Village North, Inc., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 575
Pages: 279–280

Head Matter:
Craig BONNETT, Appellant,
v.
CHRISTIAN HOSPITAL NORTHEAST-NORTHWEST and Village North, Inc., Respondents.
No. ED 106625
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
FILED: February 26, 2019
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 3, 2019
Application for Transfer Denied June 4, 2019
FOR APPELLANT: James V. O'Brien, Andrew S. Buchanan, 2240 S. Brentwood Blvd., Brentwood, Missouri 63105.
For Respondent-Christian Hospital NE/NW: John F. Mahon, Jr., Lisa A. Larkin, Stacey R. Dowd, 100 North Broadway, 21st Floor, St. Louis, MO 63102.
For Respondent - Village North, Inc.: Kenneth W. Bean, Crystal L. Settlemoir, 600 Washington Ave., 15th Floor, St. Louis, MO 63101-1313.
Before Roy L. Richter, P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Craig Bonnett ("Appellant") appeals from the trial court's grant of summary judgment on behalf of Village North, Inc. ("VNI") and the trial court's grant of the Motion to Dismiss filed by Christian Hospital Northeast-Northwest ("CHNE") on Count I ("Survival Act") of the petition filed by Appellant. The trial court dismissed Count I against CHNE on January 19, 2018. The trial court granted the motion for summary judgment by VNI for Count I on March 14, 2018, on the same grounds in the motion for dismissal filed by CHNE.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).