Case Name: Ednom Securities Corporation, Respondent, v. Rockaway Construction Co., Inc., and Others, Defendants, Impleaded with Minnie Schettino, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1930-06
Citations: 230 A.D. 726
Docket Number: 
Parties: Ednom Securities Corporation, Respondent, v. Rockaway Construction Co., Inc., and Others, Defendants, Impleaded with Minnie Schettino, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 230
Pages: 726–726

Head Matter:
Ednom Securities Corporation, Respondent, v. Rockaway Construction Co., Inc., and Others, Defendants, Impleaded with Minnie Schettino, Appellant.

Opinion:
Order, in so far as it grants the motion of the plaintiff with respect to the first defense and first counterclaim alleged in appellant's answer, and strikes out the said defense and counterclaim, reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and plaintiff's motion in said respect denied, with ten dollars costs. The allegations as to usury contained in appellant's answer under her first separate defense are sufficient to raise an issue as to the validity of the transaction in question. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Kapper, J., dissents and votes to affirm.