Case Name: Pierre E. SYLVE, Plaintiff in Error, v. DELAWARE-LOUISIANA FUR-TRAPPING COMPANY, Inc., Defendant in Error
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1926-05-18
Citations: 13 F.2d 74
Docket Number: No. 4724
Parties: Pierre E. SYLVE, Plaintiff in Error, v. DELAWARE-LOUISIANA FUR-TRAPPING COMPANY, Inc., Defendant in Error.
Judges: Before WALKER, BRYAN, and FOSTER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 13
Pages: 74–74

Head Matter:
Pierre E. SYLVE, Plaintiff in Error, v. DELAWARE-LOUISIANA FUR-TRAPPING COMPANY, Inc., Defendant in Error.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
May 18, 1926.)
No. 4724.
Eldon S. Lazarus, of New Orleans, La., for plaintiff in error.
Rene A. Viosea, of Hammond, La., for defendant in error.
Before WALKER, BRYAN, and FOSTER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This ease is so far like the case of Prejean v. Delaware-Louisiana Fur-Trapping Co., 13 F.(2d) 71, U. S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, present term, that the opinion in the latter shows the reason for the conclusion that the judgment in the above numbered and - entitled case should be reversed, and that said case be remanded for a new trial.
Reversed.