Case Name: Anthony L. HOLT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2011-12-20
Citations: 399 S.W.3d 39
Docket Number: No. ED 95577
Parties: Anthony L. HOLT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J. and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 399
Pages: 39–39

Head Matter:
Anthony L. HOLT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 95577.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Dec. 20, 2011.
Edward Scott Thompson, Public Defenders Office, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Foster, Attorney General, Jayne T. Woods, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J. and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Anthony L. Holt appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for postcon-viction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying Holt's request for post-conviction relief. We affirm.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).