Case Name: Ruth Anne BLYTHE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1967-02-21
Citations: 195 So. 2d 613
Docket Number: No. 65-585
Parties: Ruth Anne BLYTHE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before HENDRY, C. J., and CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 195
Pages: 613–613

Head Matter:
Ruth Anne BLYTHE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 65-585.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
Feb. 21, 1967.
Roy Lee Jones, Miami, for appellant.
Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Arden M. Siegendorf, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before HENDRY, C. J., and CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant was charged with the crime of being an accessory after the fact to second degree murder. She plead not guilty and upon trial was found guilty by the jury of the crime of being an accessory after the fact to manslaughter. The court entered its judgment and conviction and sentenced the appellant to three years in the state penitentiary.
Appellant contends that the trial judge erred in instructing the jury on the degrees of homicide where the appellant was charged as an accessory after the fact to second degree murder; that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict and judgment and that the prosecutor's remarks were so prejudicial as to deny the appellant a fair trial.
We find these contentions to be without merit. See: Driggers v. State, 90 Fla. 324, 105 So. 841 (1925); Nickels v. State, 90 Fla. 659, 106 So. 479, 489 (1925); Killingsworth v. State, 90 Fla. 299, 105 So. 834, 837 (1925); Hearn v. State, 43 Fla. 151, 29 So. 433 (1901).
Affirmed.