Case Name: Avery M. RIGGSBEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Wendy A. Owens; J. Michael Duncan; Interstate Insurance Service Group; S. Mitchell Freedman, M.D.; Buck Lattimore; Renee C. Riggsbee; Laura A. Karnifeld Mavetic; Dr. Anagnos Damon; W. Bain Jones, Jr.; Dr. George Edwards, Jr., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-04-28
Citations: 600 F. App'x 165
Docket Number: No. 15-1104
Parties: Avery M. RIGGSBEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Wendy A. Owens; J. Michael Duncan; Interstate Insurance Service Group; S. Mitchell Freedman, M.D.; Buck Lat-timore; Renee C. Riggsbee; Laura A. Karnifeld Mavetic; Dr. Anagnos Damon; W. Bain Jones, Jr.; Dr. George Edwards, Jr., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 600
Pages: 165–165

Head Matter:
Avery M. RIGGSBEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Wendy A. Owens; J. Michael Duncan; Interstate Insurance Service Group; S. Mitchell Freedman, M.D.; Buck Lat-timore; Renee C. Riggsbee; Laura A. Karnifeld Mavetic; Dr. Anagnos Damon; W. Bain Jones, Jr.; Dr. George Edwards, Jr., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15-1104.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 23, 2015.
Decided: April 28, 2015.
Avery M. Riggsbee, Appellant Pro Se.
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Avery M. Riggsbee appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Riggsbee v. United States, No. 1:14-cv-00563-WOJEP (M.D.N.C. Jan. 6, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.