Case Name: Aden Hussen HASSAN, Petitioner, v. Alberto GONZALES, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-05-11
Citations: 180 F. App'x 602
Docket Number: No. 04-3328
Parties: Aden Hussen HASSAN, Petitioner, v. Alberto GONZALES, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent.
Judges: Before RILEY, MAGILL, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 180
Pages: 602–603

Head Matter:
Aden Hussen HASSAN, Petitioner, v. Alberto GONZALES, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent.
No. 04-3328.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted May 5, 2006.
Filed May 11, 2006.
Aden Hussen Hassan, Rochester, MN, pro se.
Scott Baniecke, U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service, Bruce Norum, Bureau of Immigration & Customs Enforcement Department of Homeland Security, Bloomington, MN, Thomas W. Hussey, Emily Anne Radford, Papú Sandhu, Allen W. Hausman, James E. Grimes, Keith I. Braunstein, Gloria J. Minor, Joanne E. Johnson, U.S. Department of Justice Office of Immigration Litigation, Mary Jane Candaux, U.S. Department of Justice Civil Division, Washington, DC, Lori Scialabba, U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review, Falls Church, VA, for Respondent.
Before RILEY, MAGILL, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
. Alberto Gonzales has been appointed to serve as Attorney General of the United States, and is substituted as respondent pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c).

Opinion:
[UNPUBLISHED]
PER CURIAM.
Somalian native Aden Hussen Hassan (Hassan) petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), which affirmed an Immigration Judge's (IJ's) denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. We dismiss the petition for review as untimely, because Hassan did not file his petition within thirty days of the BIA's final order affirming the IJ's removal order. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1) (petition for review of order of removal "must be filed" within 30 days after date of final order of removal); Halabi v. Ashcroft, 316 F.3d 807, 808 (8th Cir.2003) (per curiam) (BIA's affirmance of IJ's ruling is "final order"); White v. INS, 6 F.3d 1312, 1317-18 (8th Cir.1993) (petition for review received by clerk one day after statutory period was untimely; rejecting argument that because post office took 5 days to deliver mailed petition, it was "constructively filed" on time; under Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, document is not filed until received by-clerk's office).
Accordingly, we dismiss the petition. See White, 6 F.3d at 1318 (dismissing untimely petition).