Case Name: Malcolm I. Glazer, Respondent, v. Mitchell T. Williams et al., Individually and Doing Business as Robinson Law Firm, et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1994-02-04
Citations: 201 A.D.2d 959
Docket Number: 
Parties: Malcolm I. Glazer, Respondent, v Mitchell T. Williams et al., Individually and Doing Business as Robinson Law Firm, et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 201
Pages: 959–959

Head Matter:
Malcolm I. Glazer, Respondent, v Mitchell T. Williams et al., Individually and Doing Business as Robinson Law Firm, et al., Appellants.
[610 NYS2d 909]

Opinion:
Order affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Defendants failed to meet their burden on this motion for summary judgment to establish as a matter of law that they were not chargeable with malpractice (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557).
All concur except Callahan, J. P., and Doerr, J., who dissent and vote to reverse in the following Memorandum.