Case Name: Abraham Reinlieb, Appellant, v. Edward J. Rose and Bernard Ratkowsky, Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1929-12
Citations: 228 A.D. 671
Docket Number: 
Parties: Abraham Reinlieb, Appellant, v. Edward J. Rose and Bernard Ratkowsky, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 228
Pages: 671–671

Head Matter:
Abraham Reinlieb, Appellant, v. Edward J. Rose and Bernard Ratkowsky, Respondents.

Opinion:
— • Order setting aside verdict reversed upon the law and the facts, with costs, and verdict reinstated, with costs. This ease was fairly submitted to the jury, whose verdict resolved the facts in appellant's favor. The verdict not being against the weight of evidence, the order setting it aside was an improper exercise of discretion. Rich, Seeger and Scudder, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Young, J., dissent and vote to affirm.