Case Name: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. RUFUS ALEXANDER, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1980-04-28
Citations: 173 N.J. Super. 260
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. RUFUS ALEXANDER, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 173
Pages: 260–261

Head Matter:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. RUFUS ALEXANDER, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Submitted April 15, 1980
Decided April 28, 1980.
Before Judges CRANE, MILMED and KING.
James T. O’Halloran, Prosecutor of Hudson County, attorney for appellant (Anthony A. Catalano, Assistant Prosecutor, on the brief).
Willis & Maslo, attorneys for respondent (Peter R. Willis on the brief).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The order under review is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Thuring in his opinion of July 18, 1979, reported at 170 N.J.Super. 298 (Law Div.1979).