Case Name: David WEISFELD and Pauline Weisfeld, Appellants, v. William S. CASSEL, Weisman, Douglas & Cassel, P.A. and Abrams, Anton, Robbins, Resnick, Schneider & Mager, P.A., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-10-02
Citations: 568 So. 2d 962
Docket Number: Nos. 89-1011, 89-1590
Parties: David WEISFELD and Pauline Weisfeld, Appellants, v. William S. CASSEL, Weisman, Douglas & Cassel, P.A. and Abrams, Anton, Robbins, Resnick, Schneider & Mager, P.A., Appellees.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, LEVY and GODERICH, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 568
Pages: 962–962

Head Matter:
David WEISFELD and Pauline Weisfeld, Appellants, v. William S. CASSEL, Weisman, Douglas & Cassel, P.A. and Abrams, Anton, Robbins, Resnick, Schneider & Mager, P.A., Appellees.
Nos. 89-1011, 89-1590.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 2, 1990.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 28, 1991.
Horton, Perse & Ginsberg and Edward A. Perse, Hoppe, Backmeyer & Nelson, Miami, for appellants.
Stephens, Lynn, Klein & McNicholas, Robert M. Klein and Philip D. Parrish, Miami, for Abrams, Anton, Robbins, Resnick, Schneider & Mager, P.A.
Cathy Jackson Lerman, Fort Lauderdale, for Weisman, Douglas & Cassel, P.A.
Before BARKDULL, LEVY and GODERICH, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1979).