Case Name: THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. JOE U. POPE, Appellant.
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1918-06-26
Citations: 37 Cal. App. 656
Docket Number: Crim. No. 437
Parties: THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. JOE U. POPE, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports
Volume: 37
Pages: 656–656

Head Matter:
[Crim. No. 437.
Third Appellate District.
June 26, 1918.]
THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. JOE U. POPE, Appellant.
Criminal Law—Indeterminate Sentence—Crime Committed Prior to Enactment.—An indeterminate sentence for a crime committed prior to the adoption of section 1168 of the Penal Code, relating to indeterminate sentences, is improper.
Id.—Bate—Verdict Supported by Evidence.—In this prosecution for the crime of rape, it is held the verdict is supported by the evidence and that no prejudicial rulings appear.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County. Malcolm C. Glenn, Judge.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
S. Lube Howe, and C. H. Crocker, for Appellant.
U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, and J. Chas. Jones, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.

Opinion:
THE COURT.
Defendant was accused by information of the crime of rape alleged to have been committed on the-day,of May, 1917, his victim being of the age of eleven years. He was convicted by a jury and the court sentenced him to serve the term of fifteen years in the state prison at San Quentin. The crime was alleged and shown to have been committed on May 3, 1917, and prior to the passage or adoption of the new section 1168 to the Penal Code, relating to indeterminate sentences, and hence the sentence was properly imposed. (Ex parte Lee, 177 Cal. 690, [171 Pac. 958].)
The transcript was filed January 18, 1918, and was placed upon the June calendar. No brief has been filed by defendant and he made no appearance at the call of the calendar. On motion of the attorney-general the cause was submitted on the record. Although not required to do so, we have examined the transcript of the evidence and rulings of the court, with the result that the verdict is shown to have support and that no prejudicial rulings appear.
The judgment is affirmed.