Case Name: Maurice Deon MANNING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-09-26
Citations: 567 So. 2d 525
Docket Number: No. 89-02295
Parties: Maurice Deon MANNING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: LEHAN, A.C.J., and FRANK and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 567
Pages: 525–525

Head Matter:
Maurice Deon MANNING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 89-02295.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Sept. 26, 1990.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Andrea Norgard, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Carol M. Dittmar, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We hold that the trial judge erred in imposing costs without affording the appellant his due process rights of notice and an opportunity to be heard. Wood v. State, 544 So.2d 1004 (Fla.1989). The other issues presented by the appellant are without merit.
Accordingly, we strike the imposition of costs without prejudice to the state to seek reimposition after proper notice. In all other respects, the convictions and sentences are affirmed.
LEHAN, A.C.J., and FRANK and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.