Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tommy Carnel GENERAL, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-12-03
Citations: 355 F. App'x 679
Docket Number: No. 09-7590
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Tommy Carnel GENERAL, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 355
Pages: 679–680

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Tommy Carnel GENERAL, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 09-7590.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 19, 2009.
Decided: Dec. 3, 2009.
Tommy Carnel General, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Tommy Carnel General appeals the district court's order denying his motion for sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for. the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. General, No. 5:99-cr00068-H-3 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 4, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.