Case Name: Generali Insurance Company of Trieste and Venice et al., Respondents, v. Honeywell, Inc., Appellant, and Midco International, Inc., et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1993-06-17
Citations: 194 A.D.2d 442
Docket Number: 
Parties: Generali Insurance Company of Trieste and Venice et al., Respondents, v Honeywell, Inc., Appellant, and Midco International, Inc., et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 194
Pages: 442–442

Head Matter:
Generali Insurance Company of Trieste and Venice et al., Respondents, v Honeywell, Inc., Appellant, and Midco International, Inc., et al., Respondents.
[599 NYS2d 254]

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.), entered April 22, 1992, which, inter alia, denied the cross-motion seeking to compel the deposition of plaintiff Generali's expert witness, Peter Valias Associates, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
The IAS Court properly determined that no "special circumstances" or conditions existed pursuant to CPLR 3101 (d) (1) (iii) warranting the deposition of plaintiff's expert witness in connection with an explosion in the basement of the insured premises, where, as here, the material physical evidence, an allegedly defective gas valve manufactured by defendant Honeywell, which allegedly caused the explosion, had not been "lost or destroyed before the other side has had an opportunity to conduct its own expert inspection" (Rosario v General Motors Corp., 148 AD2d 108, 109). On the contrary, here Honeywell, Inc. was afforded an extensive opportunity to inspect and test the allegedly faulty gas valve and had been granted access to several pre-litigation reports, prepared by Consolidated Edison and the plaintiff's expert witness as to the cause of the explosion. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Kupferman, Ross and Asch, JJ.