Case Name: Adisah Lacy AL-HANIF EL, a/k/a Fredrick Bennett, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Brad PERRITT; James McRae; W. McMullen; Carl Ocasiol, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-03-02
Citations: 594 F. App'x 186
Docket Number: No. 14-7508
Parties: Adisah Lacy AL-HANIF EL, a/k/a Fredrick Bennett, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Brad PERRITT; James McRae; W. McMullen; Carl Ocasiol, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 594
Pages: 186–186

Head Matter:
Adisah Lacy AL-HANIF EL, a/k/a Fredrick Bennett, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Brad PERRITT; James McRae; W. McMullen; Carl Ocasiol, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 14-7508.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 25, 2015.
Decided: March 2, 2015.
Adisah Lacy Al-Hanif El, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Adisah Lacy Al-Hanif El appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Al-Hanif El v. Perritt, No. 5:14-ct-03224-H (E.D.N.C. Oct. 7, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.