Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Martin ALARCON-JAIMEZ, aka Martin Guisache-Ormiga aka Martin Alejandro Lora, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-03-19
Citations: 31 F. App'x 553
Docket Number: No. 01-10577; D.C. No. CR-00-00317-RLH/LRL
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Martin ALARCON-JAIMEZ, aka Martin Guisache-Ormiga aka Martin Alejandro Lora, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 31
Pages: 553–554

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Martin ALARCON-JAIMEZ, aka Martin Guisache-Ormiga aka Martin Alejandro Lora, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 01-10577. D.C. No. CR-00-00317-RLH/LRL.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 11, 2002 .
Decided March 19, 2002.
Before FARRIS, W. FLETCHER and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Martin Alareon-Jaimez appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).
Alareon-Jaimez contends that in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), the district court improperly imposed a sentence in excess of the two year maximum set forth in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He acknowledges that his contention is foreclosed by this court's recent holdings, see e.g., United States v. Arellano-Rivera, 244 F.3d 1119, 1126-27 (9th Cir.2001), but raises the issue to preserve in the event that the Supreme Court revisits the issue. We affirm the district court.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.