Case Name: Controlled Weather of Penn. Corp., Also Known as Controlled Weather Corp. of Penn., Appellant, v. Contel Construction Corp. et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1969-10-23
Citations: 33 A.D.2d 547
Docket Number: 
Parties: Controlled Weather of Penn. Corp., Also Known as Controlled Weather Corp. of Penn., Appellant, v. Contel Construction Corp. et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 33
Pages: 547–547

Head Matter:
Controlled Weather of Penn. Corp., Also Known as Controlled Weather Corp. of Penn., Appellant, v. Contel Construction Corp. et al., Respondents.

Opinion:
Order entered February 17, 1969, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Inasmuch as the defendant Aetna Casualty and Surety Co. has stipulated to become a party to the Pennsylvania action and the plaintiff may obtain full relief in such action, we are affirming the dismissal of this action brought subsequently in this State. The circumstances justify the dismissal and a pendency' of this action, with a stay thereof, is not required for the protection of the rights of the plaintiff. Concur- — -Stevens, P. J., Eager, Tilzer, McNally and Bastow, JJ.