Case Name: Juan Jose Solorio CAMACHO, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-06-22
Citations: 234 F. App'x 728
Docket Number: No. 06-71192
Parties: Juan Jose Solorio CAMACHO, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 234
Pages: 728–729

Head Matter:
Juan Jose Solorio CAMACHO, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 06-71192.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 5, 2007.
Filed June 22, 2007.
Hristo K. Bijev, Hristo K. Bijev, Inc., Fresno, CA, for Petitioner.
Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Audrey B. Hemesath, Esq., USSAC-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Sacramento, CA, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: LEAVY, RYMER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Juan José Solorio Camacho, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' denial of his motion to reopen to apply for relief under the Convention Against Torture following the denial of cancellation of removal. The Board concluded that the motion was untimely under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2) and that Solorio Camacho had not established changed circumstances under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(h). Solorio Camacho's opening brief does not include any argument regarding either the timeliness of his motion to reopen, filed over nineteen months late, or changed circumstances in Mexico. We therefore deny the petition for review. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.