Case Name: NEIL STRUYK, BUILDING INSPECTOR OF THE BOROUGH OF NORTH HALEDON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. SAMUEL BRAEN'S SONS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1952-05-05
Citations: 9 N.J. 294
Docket Number: 
Parties: NEIL STRUYK, BUILDING INSPECTOR OF THE BOROUGH OF NORTH HALEDON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. SAMUEL BRAEN'S SONS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 9
Pages: 294–294

Head Matter:
NEIL STRUYK, BUILDING INSPECTOR OF THE BOROUGH OF NORTH HALEDON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. SAMUEL BRAEN'S SONS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Argued April 28, 1952
Decided May 5, 1952.
Mr. Hugh C. Spernow argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Evans, Hand and Evans, of counsel).
Mr. Paul Rittenberg argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. Peter Hofstra, attorney; Mr. Howard Stern, on the brief).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge William J. Brennan, Jr., in the court below.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Oliphant, Wacheneeld, Burling and Jacobs — 5.
For reversal — None.