Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mayra DE LA ROSA-AGUNDEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-06-13
Citations: 36 F. App'x 633
Docket Number: No. 00-50679; D.C. No. CR-01608-BTM
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mayra DE LA ROSA-AGUNDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 36
Pages: 633–633

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mayra DE LA ROSA-AGUNDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 00-50679.
D.C. No. CR-01608-BTM.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 10, 2002.
Decided June 13, 2002.
Before RYMER, T.G. NELSON and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Mayra De La Rosa-Agundez appeals her conviction and term of supervised release for importation of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 952 and 960. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
De La Rosa-Agundez first contends 21 U.S.C. § 952 and 960 are facially unconstitutional. This argument is precluded by United States v. Mendoza-Paz, 286 F.3d 1104, 1110 (9th Cir.2002) (§ 960) and United States v. Varela-Rivera, 279 F.3d 1174, 1175 n. 1 (9th Cir.2002) (§ 952).
De La Rosa-Agundez next contends 21 U.S.C. § 952 and 960 require the government to plead and prove her knowledge of the drug quantity and type. This argument is precluded by United States v. Carranza, 289 F.3d 634, 644 (9th Cir.2002).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.