Case Name: Devion RUSSELL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2016-03-15
Citations: 482 S.W.3d 882
Docket Number: No. ED 102934
Parties: Devion RUSSELL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J. and Angela T. Quigless, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 482
Pages: 882–882

Head Matter:
Devion RUSSELL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 102934
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Filed: March 15, 2016
For Appellant: Timothy J. Forneris, Missouri Public Defender Office, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101.
For Respondent: Nathan J. Aquino, Assistant Attorney General, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.
Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J. and Angela T. Quigless, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Devion Russell (Movant) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. On appeal, Movant claims the motion court erred by denying his post-conviction motion without an evidentiary hearing because he pleaded facts unrefuted by the record that his plea counsel was ineffective for pressuring him to plead guilty. Finding no error, we affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and have determined that an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. Rule 30.25(b).