Case Name: Dutch Smoot v. The State
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1930-11-05
Citations: 116 Tex. Crim. 170
Docket Number: No. 13737
Parties: Dutch Smoot v. The State.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Criminal Reports
Volume: 116
Pages: 170–171

Head Matter:
Dutch Smoot v. The State.
No. 13737.
Delivered November 5, 1930.
Rehearing denied December 17, 1930.
Reported in 32 S. W. (2d) 1116.
The opinion states the case.
Ridgell & Saunders of Pampa, Hart & Patterson and Hardy Hollers all of Austin, and Lockhart, Garrard & Brown of Lubbock, for appellant.
Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Attorney, of Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
MORROW, Presiding Judge.
Unlawfully selling intoxicating liquor is the offense; penalty, confinement in the penitentiary for one year.
The indictment appears regular. The facts heard by the trial court are not before us. No complaint of the ruling of the trial judge is brought forward by bill of exception or otherwise. No fundamental error has been perceived.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Hawkins, J., absent.