Case Name: Tyrone HURT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE; Unknown Agent; U.S. District Court for the D.C., Defendants-Appel-lees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-03-10
Citations: 316 F. App'x 230
Docket Number: No. 08-7271
Parties: Tyrone HURT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE; Unknown Agent; U.S. District Court for the D.C., Defendants-Appel-lees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 316
Pages: 230–231

Head Matter:
Tyrone HURT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE; Unknown Agent; U.S. District Court for the D.C., Defendants-Appel-lees.
No. 08-7271.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 20, 2009.
Decided: March 10, 2009.
Tyrone Hurt, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Tyrone Hurt appeals the district court's order denying relief on his Bivens complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hurl v. United States Marshal Serv., No. 1:08-cv-00624-LMB-TCB (E.D.Va. June 24, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Burean of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971).