Case Name: WEST v. MICHELIN et al.
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1925-10-27
Citations: 113 Okla. 199
Docket Number: No. 15888
Parties: WEST v. MICHELIN et al.
Judges: NICHOLSON, C. J., and HARRISON, MASON, PHELPS, LESTER, HUNT, CLARK, and RILEY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 113
Pages: 199–199

Head Matter:
WEST v. MICHELIN et al.
No. 15888
Opinion Filed Oct. 27, 1925.
Adams & Orr, for plaintiff in error.
Sigler & Jackson, for defendants in error.

Opinion:
BRANSON, V. C. J.
This matter is now before this court on motion to dismiss the appeal' herein, and it appears from the record that the appeal was taken from an order dissolving an attachment. It also ap- . pears that the plaintiff, who secured the attachment, prosecuted this suit while this appeal was pending in this court, and that on the trial of his cause of action, to which the attachment was ancillary, a judgment was rendered against him, from which no appeal was perfected, and the same is now a finality.
Under this state of fa.cts, the question of the correctness of the judgment of the trial court in dissolving the attachment is moot, and for that reason, the motion to dismiss the appeal should be sustained.
NICHOLSON, C. J., and HARRISON, MASON, PHELPS, LESTER, HUNT, CLARK, and RILEY, JJ., concur.