Case Name: Lawrence D. Heslin and Others, Respondents, v. Patrick J. Whalen and Others, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1925-11
Citations: 215 A.D. 713
Docket Number: 
Parties: Lawrence D. Heslin and Others, Respondents, v. Patrick J. Whalen and Others, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 215
Pages: 713–713

Head Matter:
Lawrence D. Heslin and Others, Respondents, v. Patrick J. Whalen and Others, Appellants.

Opinion:
The following is the opinion of the court below:
Van Siclen, J.:
The subject of the proposed examination seems to be as fully stated as necessary and to be the proper subject of examination. The fact that the items are in part stated as in the complaint is not a defect, especially in view of the fact that the allegations of the complaint are unusually full and detailed. The motion for the examination will be granted.