Case Name: GRANVILLE - SMITH v. GRANVILLE - SMITH
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1954-06-25
Citations: 3 V.I. 519
Docket Number: No. 11354
Parties: GRANVILLE - SMITH v. GRANVILLE - SMITH
Judges: Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and MARIS, GOODRICH, McLaughlin, kalodner, staley and hastie, Circuit Judges
Reporter: Virgin Islands Reports
Volume: 3
Pages: 519–520

Head Matter:
GRANVILLE - SMITH v. GRANVILLE - SMITH
No. 11354
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit
Submitted June 25, 1954
Decided June 25, 1954
See, also, 214 F.2d 820
Same case on appeal, see p. 701, this volume
Dudley, Hoffman and McGowan, Charlotte Amalie, St. Thomas, Virgin Islands, Arnold, Fortas and Porter, Washington, D. C., for appellant
Warren H. Young, Christiansted, St. Croix, Virgin Islands, for appellee
Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and MARIS, GOODRICH, McLaughlin, kalodner, staley and hastie, Circuit Judges

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
This case is the same with regard to all operative facts and principles of law as Alton v. Alton, 3 Cir., 1953 (2 V.I. 600), 207 F.2d 667, certiorari granted, 1954, 347 U.S. 911, 74 S. Ct. 478, 98 L. Ed 1068; proceedings dismissed because moot, June 1, 1954 (3 V.I. 699, 347 U.S. 610, 74 S. Ct. 736, 98 L. Ed. 987). That decision must govern this. While individual members of the Court have not modified their views as set out in the opinions in that case, all recognize the authority of a decision rendered after due consideration by the Court en banc.
The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.