Case Name: PERKINS et ux. v. FLANAGAN et ux.
Court: Kentucky Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Kentucky
Decision Date: 1954-05-14
Citations: 268 S.W.2d 429
Docket Number: 
Parties: PERKINS et ux. v. FLANAGAN et ux.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 268
Pages: 429–429

Head Matter:
PERKINS et ux. v. FLANAGAN et ux.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky.
May 14, 1954.
Ralph Hurt, Columbia, L. C. Lawrence, Jamestown, for appellants.
Hollis Edmonds, Russell Springs, for ap-pellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Motion for an appeal from a judgment determining the boundary line between the farm of plaintiffs, J. M. Flanagan and Meckley Flanagan, his wife, and that of defendants, Richard Perkins and Olva Perkins, his wife. The Chancellor established the boundary line in accordance with plaintiffs' contention and we conclude the evidence fully supports his finding. There is no merit in defendants' insistence that appellees' failure to trace their title back to the Commonwealth, or to a common grantor, is fatal to their case because defendants on cross-examination admitted they owned the land on one side of the boundary line in question and appellees owned the tract on the opposite side of this line. There are other alleged errors raised but a careful reading of the record convinces us they are without merit.
The motion is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.