Case Name: James S. HOLDER and Louise H. Holder, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1969-07-30
Citations: 412 F.2d 1189
Docket Number: No. 26747
Parties: James S. HOLDER and Louise H. Holder, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 412
Pages: 1189–1189

Head Matter:
James S. HOLDER and Louise H. Holder, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 26747
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
July 30, 1969.
Charles L. Goodson, U. S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., Johnnie M. Walters, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Meyer Roth-wacks, Lester B. Snyder, Mitchell Rogo-vin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Charles L. Goodson, U. S. Atty., Slaton Clemmons, Asst. U. S. Atty., of counsel, for appellant.
Harry V. Lamon, Jr., Charles T. Zink, Hansell, Post, Brandon & Dorsey, Atlanta, Ga., for appellees.
Jule M. Hannaford, Minneapolis, Minn., Dorsey, Marquart, Windhorst, West & Halladay, Minneapolis, Minn., of counsel, for Medical Group Management Ass’n, amicus curiae.
Before GEWIN, GOLDBERG and DYER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The issues presented in this case have been fully decided adversely to the appellant, United States of America, in Kurzner v. United States, 5 Cir. 1969, 413 F.2d 97.
The judgment of the District Court is
Affirmed.
. Pursuant to new Rule 18 of the Rules of this Court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir. 1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I.