Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Eddie PALMER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-02-03
Citations: 675 F. App'x 371
Docket Number: No. 16-6918
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Eddie PALMER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 675
Pages: 371–372

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Eddie PALMER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-6918
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: January 6, 2017
Decided: February 3, 2017
Harry Dennis Harmon, Jr., Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellant. Andrew Curtis Bosse, Darryl James Mitchell, Randy Carl Stoker, Assistant United States Attorneys, V. Kathleen Dougherty, Office of the United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James Eddie Palmer appeals the district court's order denying his motion nunc pro tunc to adjust his sentence pursuant to U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5G1.3(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Palmer, No. 2:93-cr-00090-AWA-2 (E.D. Va. June 28, 2016). We deny the motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED