Case Name: HUBER DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, INC., a Florida corporation, and Grantham Distributing Co., Inc., a Florida corporation, Petitioners, v. NATIONAL DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, INC., a Georgia corporation, et al., Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1974-12-04
Citations: 307 So. 2d 176
Docket Number: No. 44650
Parties: HUBER DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, INC., a Florida corporation, and Grantham Distributing Co., Inc., a Florida corporation, Petitioners, v. NATIONAL DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, INC., a Georgia corporation, et al., Respondents.
Judges: ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, DE-KLE and OVERTON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 307
Pages: 176–181

Head Matter:
HUBER DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, INC., a Florida corporation, and Grantham Distributing Co., Inc., a Florida corporation, Petitioners, v. NATIONAL DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, INC., a Georgia corporation, et al., Respondents.
No. 44650.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Dec. 4, 1974.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 20, 1975.
Mark H. Rodman of Henderson, Richardson, Henry, Buchanan, Munroe & Rod-man, Tallahassee, for petitioners.
Wilbur E. Brewton of Taylor, Brion, Buker, Hames & Greene, Tallahassee, T. R. Manry, III, and Charles F. Clark, of MacFarlane, Ferguson, Allison and Kelly, Tampa, and J. Riley Davis, Tallahassee, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, § 3(b)(3), Fla.Const. (1973). Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby
Discharged.
It is so ordered.
ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, DE-KLE and OVERTON, JJ., concur.
ERVIN, J., dissents with opinion.