Case Name: Nathaniel KNOX, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The State of NORTH CAROLINA Cumberland County Transportation; Majestic Luxury Tours, Incorporated; Rudy; Unknown Name Driver and Helper, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-11-22
Citations: 455 F. App'x 296
Docket Number: No. 11-1709
Parties: Nathaniel KNOX, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The State of NORTH CAROLINA Cumberland County Transportation; Majestic Luxury Tours, Incorporated; Rudy; Unknown Name Driver and Helper, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before KING, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 455
Pages: 296–296

Head Matter:
Nathaniel KNOX, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The State of NORTH CAROLINA Cumberland County Transportation; Majestic Luxury Tours, Incorporated; Rudy; Unknown Name Driver and Helper, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 11-1709.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 17, 2011.
Decided: Nov. 22, 2011.
Nathaniel Knox, Appellant Pro Se.
Before KING, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Nathaniel Knox appeals the district court's order denying his motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The denial of in forma pauperis status is immediately appealable. Roberts v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 339 U.S. 844, 845, 70 S.Ct. 954, 94 L.Ed. 1326 (1950) (per curiam). We have reviewed the record and conclude the appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal and affirm the order denying pauper status for the reasons stated by the district court. See Knox v. North Carolina, No. 5:11-cv-00107-BO (E.D.N.C. June 9, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.