Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Peter SIMPSON, a/k/a Peter Pillings, a/k/a Clarence Floyd, a/k/a Diamond, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-07-23
Citations: 474 F. App'x 245
Docket Number: No. 12-6416
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Peter SIMPSON, a/k/a Peter Pillings, a/k/a Clarence Floyd, a/k/a Diamond, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 474
Pages: 245–246

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Peter SIMPSON, a/k/a Peter Pillings, a/k/a Clarence Floyd, a/k/a Diamond, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-6416.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 19, 2012.
Decided: July 23, 2012.
Peter Simpson, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia; Stephen Donald Warner, Assistant United States Attorney, Elkins, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Peter Simpson appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Simpson, No. 1:95-cr-00005-IMK-1 (N.D.W.Va. Feb. 17, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.