Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose TRINIDAD-CASTRO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-06-19
Citations: 38 F. App'x 472
Docket Number: No. 01-50085; D.C. No. CR-00-02559-IEG
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jose TRINIDAD-CASTRO, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 38
Pages: 472–472

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jose TRINIDAD-CASTRO, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 01-50085.
D.C. No. CR-00-02559-IEG.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 10, 2002.
Decided June 19, 2002.
Before RYMER, T.G. NELSON, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Jose Trinidad-Castro appeals his conviction by guilty plea to one count of importation of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 952 and 960. Trinidad-Castro's contention that the indictment should be dismissed because Sections 952 and 960 are unconstitutional under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), is foreclosed by United States v. Mendoza-Paz, 286 F.3d 1104, 1109-1111 (9th Cir.2002) (Section 960), and United States v. Varela-Rivera, 279 F.3d 1174, 1175 n. 1 (9th Cir.2002) (Section 952). His contention that the indictment should be dismissed because it did not allege mens rea as to drug type and quantity is foreclosed by United States v. Carranza, 289 F.3d 634, -, - - -, slip op. 6531, 6546-47 (9th Cir.2002).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.