Case Name: Edward W. JEFFERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shane WOOTEN, Officer; Craig Wilkins, Officer; Paul Ziolkowski, Lieutenant; John Flaig, Major; Michael King, Security Chief; B. Danna, Detective; William Justice, Sergeant; Kathy Killian, Nurse; Gary Maynard; M. Mitchell, Officer; Officer Travis; Kristy Hickman; Karen M. Dean; Commissioner Galley; State of Maryland, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-02-02
Citations: 463 F. App'x 187
Docket Number: No. 11-7128
Parties: Edward W. JEFFERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shane WOOTEN, Officer; Craig Wilkins, Officer; Paul Ziolkowski, Lieutenant; John Flaig, Major; Michael King, Security Chief; B. Danna, Detective; William Justice, Sergeant; Kathy Killian, Nurse; Gary Maynard; M. Mitchell, Officer; Officer Travis; Kristy Hickman; Karen M. Dean; Commissioner Galley; State of Maryland, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 463
Pages: 187–187

Head Matter:
Edward W. JEFFERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shane WOOTEN, Officer; Craig Wilkins, Officer; Paul Ziolkowski, Lieutenant; John Flaig, Major; Michael King, Security Chief; B. Danna, Detective; William Justice, Sergeant; Kathy Killian, Nurse; Gary Maynard; M. Mitchell, Officer; Officer Travis; Kristy Hickman; Karen M. Dean; Commissioner Galley; State of Maryland, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 11-7128.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 31, 2012.
Decided: Feb. 2, 2012.
Edward W. Jefferson, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland; Philip Melton Andrews, Eric Lawrence Klein, Kramon & Graham, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Edward W. Jefferson appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jefferson v. Wooten, No. 1:10-cv-02927-JFM, 2011 WL 3511036 (D.Md. Aug. 9, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.