Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marcelo CHAVEZ-MONTEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-12-28
Citations: 261 F. App'x 945
Docket Number: No. 05-10432
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marcelo CHAVEZ-MONTEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before GOODWIN, WALLACE and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 261
Pages: 945–946

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marcelo CHAVEZ-MONTEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-10432.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 3, 2007.
Filed Dec. 28, 2007.
Marianne A. Pansa, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Fresno, CA, for PlaintiffAppellee.
Patience Milrod, Esq., Fresno, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before GOODWIN, WALLACE and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Marcelo Chavez-Montez appeals from his jury-trial conviction and the 115-month sentence imposed for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel is denied.
Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.