Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dante VARGAS-AMAYA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-05-25
Citations: 408 F.3d 1227
Docket Number: No. 03-50577
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dante VARGAS-AMAYA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: T.G. NELSON, TASHIMA, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 408
Pages: 1227–1233

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dante VARGAS-AMAYA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 03-50577.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 25, 2005.
Carol C. Lam, U.S. Attorney, Renee M. Bunker, Assistant U.S. Attorney (on brief and at oral argument), and Larry E. Spong, Assistant U.S. Attorney (on Government’s Petition for Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc), Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego,' CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Vincént J. Brunkow, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: T.G. NELSON, TASHIMA, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dissent by
Judge CALLAHAN.
ORDER
The panel has voted to deny the government's petition for panel rehearing. Judge Fisher votes to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judges T.G. Nelson and Tashima so recommend. A judge of the court requested a vote on whether to rehear the .matter en banc, but the matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonreeused active judges in favor of en banc rehearing.
The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED.