Case Name: Dhooge Bros., Inc., Respondent, v. Joaquin P. Mecho, Appellant, et al., Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1962-02-27
Citations: 15 A.D.2d 774
Docket Number: 
Parties: Dhooge Bros., Inc., Respondent, v. Joaquin P. Mecho, Appellant, et al., Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 15
Pages: 774–774

Head Matter:
Dhooge Bros., Inc., Respondent, v. Joaquin P. Mecho, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Opinion:
Plaintiff has failed to set forth sufficient facts establishing misrepresentation or fraud on the part of the moving defendant who was not a party to the contract. " Fraud cannot be inferred, it must be proved." (Anderson v. Malley, 191 App. Div. 573, 575.) Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, McNally and Eager, JJ.