Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Daniel ROJAS-PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-03-02
Citations: 368 F. App'x 804
Docket Number: No. 09-10141
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Daniel ROJAS-PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 368
Pages: 804–804

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Daniel ROJAS-PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-10141.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 16, 2010.
Filed March 2, 2010.
Lisa Jennis Settel, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Joanne Frances Landfair, Esquire, La-veen, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Juan Daniel Rojas-Perez, pro se.
Before: FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Juan Daniel Rojas-Perez appeals from the 46-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to harbor illegal aliens, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(l)(A)(iii), (a)(l)(A)(v)(I); and re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Rojas-Perez contends that the appeal waiver in his plea agreement does not preclude this appeal because his sentence is not consistent with his plea agreement. Because the record belies this contention, we enforce the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Bibler, 495 F.3d 621, 624 (9th Cir.2007); see also United States v. Schuman, 127 F.3d 815, 817 (9th Cir.1997) (per curiam).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.