Case Name: David Luis JIMENEZ; Rosa Leticia Jimenez, Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-12-27
Citations: 215 F. App'x 665
Docket Number: No. 05-76406
Parties: David Luis JIMENEZ; Rosa Leticia Jimenez, Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 215
Pages: 665–666

Head Matter:
David Luis JIMENEZ; Rosa Leticia Jimenez, Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 05-76406.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 21, 2006.
Filed Dec. 27, 2006.
David Luis Jimenez, Santa Ana, CA, pro se.
Rosa Leticia Jimenez, Santa Ana, CA, pro se.
Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, San Francisco, CA, Kurt B. Larson, Esq., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
David Luis Jimenez and Rosa Leticia Jimenez, married natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' order affirming without opinion an immigration judge's ("IJ") decision denying their applications for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review the IJ's discretionary determination that the petitioners failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship, and thus do not consider the petitioners' contention that the IJ failed to consider all of the hardship factors. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.