Case Name: Mahoning County Bar Association et al. v. Carson
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1994-02-23
Citations: 68 Ohio St. 3d 342
Docket Number: No. 93-2184
Parties: Mahoning County Bar Association et al. v. Carson.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 68
Pages: 342–344

Head Matter:
Mahoning County Bar Association et al. v. Carson.
[Cite as Mahoning Cty. Bar Assn. v. Carson (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 342.]
(No. 93-2184
Submitted December 7, 1993
Decided February 23, 1994.)
Pfau, Pfau & Pfau and Brian N. Ramm; and Richard W. Machuga, for relator Mahoning County Bar Association.
Wem, Kelligher & Brutz and W. Chad Kelligher; Letson, Griffith, Woodall & Lavelle Co., L.P.A., and Lynn B. Griffith III, for relator Trumbull County Bar Association.
Edward L. Carson, pro se.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We concur in the findings and recommendation of the board. Edward L. Carson is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.