Case Name: HAIGHT v. HAIGHT
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1963-07-31
Citations: 235 Or. 238
Docket Number: 
Parties: HAIGHT v. HAIGHT
Judges: Before McAllister, Chief Justice, and Perry, O’Connell, Denecke and Lusk, Justices.
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 235
Pages: 238–239

Head Matter:
Argued July 3,
affirmed July 31, 1963
HAIGHT v. HAIGHT
384 P. 2d 151
H. M. Weatherford, Albany, argued tbe cause for appellant. On the brief were Weatherford & Thompson, Albany.
C. S. Emmons, Albany, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Willis, Kyle & Emmons, Albany.
Before McAllister, Chief Justice, and Perry, O’Connell, Denecke and Lusk, Justices.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The plaintiff brought suit for divorce against the defendant on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment. The trial court denied the divorce and dismissed plaintiff's complaint. From the judgment of the trial court the plaintiff appeals.
No purpose would be served in detailing the evidence in this case. We have carefully examined the record and reach the same conclusion as reached by the trial court.
There is nothing in this record that suggests a purpose of the defendant to injure the plaintiff, or such "gross and callous want of consideration for the sensibilities and legitimate wishes and interests of the" wife "as to amount in law to such a purpose." Guinn v. Guinn, 188 Or 554, 562, 217 P2d 248.
The judgment is affirmed with costs to neither party.