Case Name: Richard RINALDO a/k/a Mohamed Abdul Mohamed, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-05-03
Citations: 653 So. 2d 1143
Docket Number: No. 94-1587
Parties: Richard RINALDO a/k/a Mohamed Abdul Mohamed, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: DELL, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and FARMER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 653
Pages: 1143–1143

Head Matter:
Richard RINALDO a/k/a Mohamed Abdul Mohamed, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 94-1587.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
May 3, 1995.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Ian Seldin, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Edward L. Giles, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm. Appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error in the points raised on appeal. However, we remand for the trial court to correct the written order of probation so that it reflects the court-imposed restitution requirement. See § 775.089(1)(a), Fla.Stat. (1993).
AFFIRMED but REMANDED.
DELL, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and FARMER, JJ., concur.