Case Name: ALLIED TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee, and Monster Government Solutions, LLC, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-07-16
Citations: 388 F. App'x 974
Docket Number: No. 2010-5131
Parties: ALLIED TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee, and Monster Government Solutions, LLC, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Claims Reporter
Volume: 95
Pages: 974–975

Head Matter:
ALLIED TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee, and Monster Government Solutions, LLC, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 2010-5131.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
July 16, 2010.
Frederick W. Claybrook Jr., Crowell & Moring, LLP, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Jacob B. Pankowski, Greenberg Traurig LLP, Michael N. O’Connell Jr., Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee.

Opinion:
ON MOTION
ORDER
Monster Government Solutions, LLC moves without opposition for leave to intervene.
The court notes that Monster intervened in the trial court on the side of the defen dant. Thus, Monster should be listed in the court's caption as a defendant-appellee, and the motion to intervene in this court is unnecessary.
Upon consideration thereof,
It Is OrdeRed That:
The motion is denied as moot. The revised official caption is reflected above.