Case Name: Francis X. WAREHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-08-02
Citations: 678 So. 2d 432
Docket Number: Nos. 96-1608, 96-1828
Parties: Francis X. WAREHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: GOSHORN and ANTOON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 678
Pages: 432–433

Head Matter:
Francis X. WAREHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Nos. 96-1608, 96-1828.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Aug. 2, 1996.
Rehearing Denied Aug. 30, 1996.
Francis X. Wareham, Polk City, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.

Opinion:
GRIFFIN, Judge.
In these two cases, which we consolidate and consider together, defendant appeals the summary denial of his third and his fourth Rule 3.800(a) motions to correct sentences he received for burglary, after violation of probation, and for manslaughter.
The trial court correctly ruled that these motions are frivolous and constitute an abuse of the court's process. There is no need to indulge such filings until their number approaches a dozen. Accordingly, we order that appellant shall not be permitted to file any further pro se attacks upon his 1989 judgment and sentences.
AFFIRMED with directions.
GOSHORN and ANTOON, JJ., concur.
. It is denominated a "supplement."