Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio VILLANUEVA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-03-17
Citations: 171 F. App'x 633
Docket Number: No. 04-10420
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Antonio VILLANUEVA, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: CANBY, BEEZER, and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 171
Pages: 633–633

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Antonio VILLANUEVA, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 04-10420.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 8, 2006.
Decided March 17, 2006.
Debra R. Douglas, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Oakland, CA, for PlaintiffAppellee.
George C. Boisseau, Esq., Santa Rosa, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: CANBY, BEEZER, and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Antonio Villanueva appeals from the 70-month sentence imposed after his guilty plea to illegal reentry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
The record reflects that the district court would have imposed the same sentence had it been aware that the Sentencing Guidelines were advisory. See United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073,1083 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.