Case Name: In the Matter of the Marriage of WARD, nka Davis, Respondent, and WARD, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1990-02-14
Citations: 100 Or. App. 545
Docket Number: 83-7-85; CA A60151
Parties: In the Matter of the Marriage of WARD, nka Davis, Respondent, and WARD, Appellant.
Judges: Before Graber, Presiding Judge, and Richardson and Edmonds, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 100
Pages: 545–546

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted October 30, 1989,
affirmed February 14, 1990
In the Matter of the Marriage of WARD, nka Davis, Respondent, and WARD, Appellant.
(83-7-85; CA A60151)
786 P2d 1295
Tony Pizzuti, Canby, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.
Robert A. Bennett, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were David L. Johnstone and Bennett, Hartman, Tauman & Reynolds, P.C., Portland.
Before Graber, Presiding Judge, and Richardson and Edmonds, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Husband appeals from an order, entered on February 22, 1989, modifying his child support obligation. We will not apply the new child support guidelines on de novo review of an order entered before October 3, 1989. Butcher and Butcher, 100 Or App 476, 786 P2d 1293 (1990).
Affirmed. Costs to wife.