Case Name: Andre BISHRAM, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2011-11-16
Citations: 77 So. 3d 720
Docket Number: No. 3D10-2032
Parties: Andre BISHRAM, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before CORTIÑAS and ROTHENBERG, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 77
Pages: 720–720

Head Matter:
Andre BISHRAM, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D10-2032.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 16, 2011.
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Daniel Tibbitt, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Nicholas Merlin, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before CORTIÑAS and ROTHENBERG, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See State v. Morsman, 394 So.2d 408, 409 (Fla.1981) ("Under Florida law it is clear that one does not harbor an expectation of privacy on a front porch where salesmen or visitors may appear at any time."); Nieminski v. State, 60 So.3d 521, 527 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) ("[I]f the address . had been a more traditional lot in a residential neighborhood surrounded by a white picket fence and a gate that closed but did not lock, no one would reasonably suggest that the knock and talk was improper or that officers were required to describe the picket fence in the affidavit used to obtain the warrant."); see generally Shapiro v. State, 390 So.2d 344, 347 (Fla.1980) ("In order for [the defendant] to claim that his fourth amendment rights were violated, he must first establish that he had a reasonable expectation of privacy to be free from this particular intrusion.").