Case Name: Khor Chin LIM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-09-22
Citations: 76 F. App'x 177
Docket Number: No. 03-15266; D.C. No. CV-03-05508-WHA
Parties: Khor Chin LIM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 76
Pages: 177–177

Head Matter:
Khor Chin LIM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 03-15266.
D.C. No. CV-03-05508-WHA.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 15, 2003.
Decided Sept. 22, 2003.
Khor Chin Lim, Sunnyvale, CA, pro se.
Before B. FLETCHER, SILVERMAN, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Khor Chin Lim appeals pro se from the district court's order dismissing sua sponte his diversity action alleging various tort and contract causes of action against defendant employees and administrators of the University of California system. We consider on our own motion whether an order dismissing a complaint is appealable, California v. Harvier, 700 F.2d 1217, 1218 (9th Cir.1983), and we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
In general, an order dismissing a complaint but not the underlying action is not a final order appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. See id. In this case, the district court entered an order dismissing the complaint without prejudice, and never entered a judgment. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Lopez v. City of Needles, 95 F.3d 20, 23 (9th Cir.1996).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.