Case Name: E.V.V., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1994-02-08
Citations: 631 So. 2d 359
Docket Number: No. 93-1542
Parties: E.V.V., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before COPE, GERSTEN and GODERICH, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 631
Pages: 359–360

Head Matter:
E.V.V., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 93-1542.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 8, 1994.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Amy D. Ronner, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, and Phyllis M. Devitt and Loubna W. Haddad, Certified Legal Interns, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Richard L. Polin, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Keith S. Kromash, Certified Legal Intern, for ap-pellee.
Before COPE, GERSTEN and GODERICH, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
E.V.V. appeals an order adjudicating him delinquent for theft. We conclude (a) that there was no violation of the best evidence rule, § 90.952, Fla.Stat. (1991); (b) that there was no abuse of discretion with respect to the Richardson hearing; (c) that there was no Brady violation, see Arizona v. Youngblood, 488 U.S. 51, 109 S.Ct. 333, 102 L.Ed.2d 281 (1988); and (d) that the motion for judgment of acquittal was properly denied.
Affirmed.
. Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d 771 (Fla.1971).
. Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963).