Case Name: In the Matter of Roslyn Arnow et al., Individually, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated, Appellants, v. Board of Higher Education of the City of New York, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1966-10-27
Citations: 18 N.Y.2d 828
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Roslyn Arnow et al., Individually, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated, Appellants, v. Board of Higher Education of the City of New York, Respondent.
Judges: Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Van Voorhis, Bukke, Scileppi, Berdan and Keating.
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 18
Pages: 828–830

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Roslyn Arnow et al., Individually, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated, Appellants, v. Board of Higher Education of the City of New York, Respondent.
Argued October 17, 1966;
decided October 27, 1966.
Benjamin M. Zelman for appellants.
J. Lee Ranldn, Corporation Counsel (Isidore Heyman, Seymour B. Quel and John J. Loflin of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Van Voorhis, Bukke, Scileppi, Berdan and Keating.