Case Name: Rose King, Appellant-Respondent, v. Joseph Pelkofski, Defendant, and Genevieve Pelkofski, Respondent-Appellant, et al., Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1966-07-07
Citations: 18 N.Y.2d 688
Docket Number: 
Parties: Rose King, Appellant-Respondent, v. Joseph Pelkofski, Defendant, and Genevieve Pelkofski, Respondent-Appellant, et al., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 18
Pages: 688–689

Head Matter:
Rose King, Appellant-Respondent, v. Joseph Pelkofski, Defendant, and Genevieve Pelkofski, Respondent-Appellant, et al., Respondent.
Argued April 28, 1966;
decided July 7, 1966.
John J. Boyle, James J. Weissman and John C. O’Malley for appellant-respondent.
Richard W. Walser and Howard J. Grace for respondent-appellant.

Opinion:
Appeals dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution because it directs a remission to the Trial Term to ascertain the total of various items which gives plaintiff a lien upon the real estate. Appeals may be taken directly to this court from the determination hereafter to be made by the Trial Term.