Case Name: Natalia PEYSINA, Appellant, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, etc., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2014-05-14
Citations: 138 So. 3d 1137
Docket Number: No. 3D14-8
Parties: Natalia PEYSINA, Appellant, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, etc., Appellee.
Judges: Before WELLS, LAGOA, and LOGUE, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 138
Pages: 1137–1138

Head Matter:
Natalia PEYSINA, Appellant, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, etc., Appellee.
No. 3D14-8.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 14, 2014.
Parrish & Yarnell, P.A., and Jon D. Parrish (Naples), for appellant.
Morris, Laing, Evans, Brock & Kennedy, CHTD, and Jeremy W. Harris, Khari E. Taustin, Masimba M. Matamba, and Angela Barbosa Wilborn (West Palm Beach), for appellee.
Before WELLS, LAGOA, and LOGUE, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm because competent, substantial evidence supports the trial court's finding that Deutsche Bank National Trust Company conducted an adequate search to locate Natalia Peysina prior to constructive service. See generally Giron v. Ugly Mortg., Inc., 935 So.2d 580, 582 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) ("If there is a challenge to constructive service, the trial court has the duty of determining . whether the plaintiff conducted an adequate search to locate the defendants. Our standard of review determines whether there was competent substantial evidence to support the decision of the trial judge.") (internal citation omitted).