Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Charles Randolph, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2012-12-13
Citations: 101 A.D.3d 482
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles Randolph, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 101
Pages: 482–482

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles Randolph, Appellant.
[954 NYS2d 868]

Opinion:
The resentencing proceeding imposing a term of postrelease supervision was neither barred by double jeopardy nor otherwise unlawful (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]), and we do not find that term to be excessive. We have no authority to revisit defendant's prison sentence on this appeal (see id. at 635). Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Mazzarelli, Acosta and Román, JJ.