Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dewayne Kevon MOORE, a.k.a. Lil Stuck, a.k.a. Dewayn Moore, a.k.a. Dewayne K. Moore, a.k.a. Dewayne Kevin Moore, a.k.a. Dewayne Kevon Walter Moore, a.k.a. Duwayne Moore, a.k.a. Stuck, a.k.a. Wayne, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-05-31
Citations: 691 F. App'x 873
Docket Number: No. 16-50275
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dewayne Kevon MOORE, a.k.a. Lil Stuck, a.k.a. Dewayn Moore, a.k.a. Dewayne K. Moore, a.k.a. Dewayne Kevin Moore, a.k.a. Dewayne Kevon Walter Moore, a.k.a. Duwayne Moore, a.k.a. Stuck, a.k.a. Wayne, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and SILVERMAN and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 691
Pages: 873–873

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dewayne Kevon MOORE, a.k.a. Lil Stuck, a.k.a. Dewayn Moore, a.k.a. Dewayne K. Moore, a.k.a. Dewayne Kevin Moore, a.k.a. Dewayne Kevon Walter Moore, a.k.a. Duwayne Moore, a.k.a. Stuck, a.k.a. Wayne, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-50275
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 24, 2017
Filed May 31, 2017
Jean-Claude Andre, Joshua Mausner, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, Terrence Mann, Sara B. Milstein, Ms, DOJ — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Michael Tanaka, Deputy Federal Public Defender, FPDCA — Federal Public Defender’s Office (Los Angeles), Los Ange-les, CA, for Defendant-Appellant
Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and SILVERMAN and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Dewayne Kevon Moore appeals from the district court's judgment revoking supervised release. Because Moore has fully served his revocation sentence and is not subject to a term of supervised release, we dismiss this appeal as moot. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 14, 118 S.Ct. 978, 140 L.Ed.2d 43 (1998); United States v. Palomba, 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir. 1999).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.