Case Name: Ramon Daniel MORALES-CORBALA, Petitioner-Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America; Warden, Reeves County Detention Center III; Bureau of Prisons; GEO Group, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-11-29
Citations: 498 F. App'x 467
Docket Number: No. 11-50704
Parties: Ramon Daniel MORALES-CORBALA, Petitioner-Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America; Warden, Reeves County Detention Center III; Bureau of Prisons; GEO Group, Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 498
Pages: 467–468

Head Matter:
Ramon Daniel MORALES-CORBALA, Petitioner-Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America; Warden, Reeves County Detention Center III; Bureau of Prisons; GEO Group, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 11-50704
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Nov. 29, 2012.
Ramon Daniel Morales-Corbala, Cl Reeves III, Pecos, TX, pro se.
Gary Layton Anderson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Respondents-Appellees.
Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Ramon Daniel Morales-Corbala, federal prisoner # 52818-208, an alien against whom the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement has issued a detainer subjecting him to immediate removal from the United States upon release from Bureau of Prisons (BOP) custody, appeals the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging the BOP's exclusion of him from rehabilitation programs and halfway houses. The petition is foreclosed by this court's decision in Gallegos-Hernandez v. United States, 688 F.3d 190, 192-93 (5th Cir.2012), cert. denied (— U.S.-, 133 S.Ct. 561, 184 L.Ed.2d 365). Morales-Corbala's motion to expedite the appeal or for summary affirmance is denied.
AFFIRMED; MOTION DENIED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.