Case Name: In re Haleh MERRIKH, Debtor, Quincy Plaza, L.C., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Haleh Merrikh, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-02-02
Citations: 463 F. App'x 185
Docket Number: No. 11-1610
Parties: In re Haleh MERRIKH, Debtor, Quincy Plaza, L.C., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Haleh Merrikh, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 463
Pages: 185–186

Head Matter:
In re Haleh MERRIKH, Debtor, Quincy Plaza, L.C., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Haleh Merrikh, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-1610.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 31, 2012.
Decided: Feb. 2, 2012.
Christopher Stuart Moffitt, Law Offices of Christopher S. Moffitt, P.C.L., Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Jeffery S. Romanick, A. Charles Dean, Gross & Ro-manick, P.C., Fairfax, Virginia, for Appel-lee.
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Haleh Merrikh appeals the district court's order denying her motion to extend time to file an appellate brief and dismissing her appeal from the bankruptcy court's order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Quincy Plaza, L.C. v. Merrikh (In re Merrikh), Nos. 1:11-cv-00164-CMH-IDD; 09-18890-SSM; 10-01024-SSM (E.D. Va. filed May 3, 2011; entered May 4, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.