Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David RAMIREZ-SOLIS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-07-09
Citations: 285 F. App'x 406
Docket Number: No. 06-10235
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. David RAMIREZ-SOLIS, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: REINHARDT, LEAVY, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 285
Pages: 406–406

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. David RAMIREZ-SOLIS, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 06-10235.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 18, 2008.
Filed July 9, 2008.
Bruce M. Ferg, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Francisco Leon, Esq., Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: REINHARDT, LEAVY, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
David Ramirez-Solis appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 51-month sentence for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), appellant's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and- the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.