Case Name: Jesse JACKSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-12-26
Citations: 63 S.W.3d 685
Docket Number: No. ED 79022
Parties: Jesse JACKSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., P.J., and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 63
Pages: 685–685

Head Matter:
Jesse JACKSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 79022.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Dec. 26, 2001.
Jennifer S. Walsh, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Susan L. Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., P.J., and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Jesse Jackson, appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing. He contends his plea attorney provided ineffective assistance, which rendered his guilty plea involuntary. Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).