Case Name: Johnny J. E. MEADOWS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lon EVANS, Sheriff, Tarrant County, Texas, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1977-04-08
Citations: 550 F.2d 345
Docket Number: No. 74-3362
Parties: Johnny J. E. MEADOWS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lon EVANS, Sheriff, Tarrant County, Texas, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 550
Pages: 345–353

Head Matter:
Johnny J. E. MEADOWS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lon EVANS, Sheriff, Tarrant County, Texas, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 74-3362.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 8, 1977.
Richard M. Lannen, Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, Dallas, Tex. (Court-appointed not under the Act), for plaintiff-appellant.
Tim Curry, Crim. Dist. Atty., Howard M. Fender, Asst. Dist. Atty., Ft. Worth, Tex., John L. Hill, Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., for plaintiff-appellant.
Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and TUT-TLE, GEWIN, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, DYER, MORGAN, CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJOFLAT and HILL, Circuit Judges.
Circuit Judges WISDOM and THORNBERRY did not participate in this decision.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
This case was decided by a divided panel of this Court, the opinion being reported at 529 F.2d 385 (5th Cir. 1976). Petition for rehearing en banc was granted. Meadows v. Evans, 529 F.2d 387 (5th Cir. 1976). After additional briefing and oral argument, the en banc court has decided to adhere to the majority opinion of the panel, so that opinion now states the position of the en banc court on this case.
Accordingly, the en banc court reverses and remands this case to the district court first, for consideration of any damage claims made for asserted deprivations during confinement, which can be made without exhaustion, and second, for consideration of whether claims going to the involuntariness of the confession, which claims cannot proceed prior to exhaustion of state Remedies, should be held in abeyance rather than dismissed in light of the statute of limitations problem inherent in dismissal.