Case Name: BERT AUSTIN v. STATE; DOC DAULTON v. STATE; G. C. SMITH v. STATE; M. A. TURNER v. STATE; J. F. SHERRELL v. STATE
Court: Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1911-11-11
Citations: 6 Okla. Crim. 669
Docket Number: No. A-811; No. A-812; No. A-813; No. A-816; No. A-820
Parties: BERT AUSTIN v. STATE. DOC DAULTON v. STATE. G. C. SMITH v. STATE. M. A. TURNER v. STATE. J. F. SHERRELL v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: Oklahoma Criminal Reports
Volume: 6
Pages: 669–669

Head Matter:
BERT AUSTIN v. STATE. DOC DAULTON v. STATE. G. C. SMITH v. STATE. M. A. TURNER v. STATE. J. F. SHERRELL v. STATE.
No. A-811.
No. A-812.
No. A-813.
No. A-816.
No. A-820.
Opinion Filed November 11, 1911.
Each of the above appellants were convicted of violating the prohibitory liquor law, and appeals.
Smith C. Matson, Asst. Atty. Q-en., for the State.

Opinion:
PEE CUEIAM.
The records in each of the above numbered cases have been filed in this court for more than a year, and no brief has been filed in either of said cases in behalf of the appellants. Said cases being reached for submission on the regular call of the docket and no one appearing on behalf of the appellants in each of said eases, the Assistant Attorney General, therefore, has filed a motion in each ease to affirm the judgment of the lower court because the appeal in each case has not been prosecuted. See Joe Price v. State, 5 Okla. Cr. 147. The clerk of this court is, therefore, directed to enter a judgment of affirmance in each of said eases, and without delay send the mandate out in each ease directing the trial court in each case to enforce its judgment.