Case Name: Village of Ardsley, Respondent, v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, Appellant, et al., Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1949-01-31
Citations: 274 A.D. 1075
Docket Number: 
Parties: Village of Ardsley, Respondent, v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, Appellant, et al., Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 274
Pages: 1075–1075

Head Matter:
Village of Ardsley, Respondent, v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Opinion:
In an action to reform a certificate of continuance of a surety bond, and a surety bond, and to recover thereon as reformed, order denying, conditionally, appellant's motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to prosecute the action, reversed on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, without costs. There was a delay of approximately three years, and younger issues have been tried. There is no meritorious showing that the delay was not unreasonable. Johnston, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.