Case Name: ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF INDIANA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. SAV-ON-DRUGS, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1960-03-07
Citations: 31 N.J. 591
Docket Number: 
Parties: ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF INDIANA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. SAV-ON-DRUGS, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 31
Pages: 591–591

Head Matter:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF INDIANA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. SAV-ON-DRUGS, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Argued February 22, 1960
Decided March 7, 1960.
Mr. Melvin P. Antell argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Lorentz & Stdmler, attorneys).
Mr. Warren F. Dunn argued the cause for the defendant-respondent (Messrs. Lum, Fairlie & Foster, attorneys; Mr. Glaus Motulshy, of the New York bar, on the brief).
Mr. Murry Brochin argued the cause for the State of New Jersey, intervenor (Mr. David D. Furman, attorney).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Scherer in the court below.
For affirmance—Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Burling, Jacobs, Erancis, Proctor and Schettino—6.
For reversal—Justice Hall—1.