Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Donald HARTMAN, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-02-19
Citations: 68 S.W.3d 603
Docket Number: No. ED 79712
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Donald HARTMAN, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., P.J., and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 68
Pages: 603–603

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Donald HARTMAN, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 79712.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Feb. 19, 2002.
Nancy A. McKerrow, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Dora A. Fichter, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., P.J., and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Donald Hartman (Defendant) appeals the judgment entered following his jury convictions for committing violence against an employee of the Department of Corrections violating Section 217.385, RSMo 2000. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).