Case Name: Virgil FAIRCHILD, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. John HATFIELD, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Idaho Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Idaho
Decision Date: 1979-06-05
Citations: 100 Idaho 198
Docket Number: No. 12803
Parties: Virgil FAIRCHILD, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. John HATFIELD, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before SHEPARD, C. J., DONALDSON, BAKES and BISTLINE, JJ., and SCOGGIN, J. Pro Tem.
Reporter: Idaho Reports
Volume: 100
Pages: 198–198

Head Matter:
595 P.2d 1093
Virgil FAIRCHILD, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. John HATFIELD, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12803.
Supreme Court of Idaho.
June 5, 1979.
Michael B. Sweet and R. Brad Masingill of Ryan & Sweet, Weiser, for defendant-appellant.
Lary C. Walker of Walker & Sanders, Weiser, for plaintiff-respondent.
Before SHEPARD, C. J., DONALDSON, BAKES and BISTLINE, JJ., and SCOGGIN, J. Pro Tem.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Defendant appellant Hatfield brings this appeal from a district court judgment which awarded plaintiff respondent Fair-child $2,820 in damages plus costs and $750 in attorney fees on a claim arising from an arrangement the parties entered into with respect to a used 1950 model D-8 Caterpillar bulldozer. We have reviewed the record in the above cause and find no prejudicial error. I.R.C.P. 52(a); Obray v. Mitchell, 98 Idaho 533, 567 P.2d 1284 (1977). Therefore, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Costs to respondent.
BAKES, J., dissenting.