Case Name: ANDREW LEWIS, PLAINTIFF, v. JAMES FELZ AND CHARLES LOESSIG, DEFENDANTS
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1931-12-22
Citations: 10 N.J. Misc. 74
Docket Number: 
Parties: ANDREW LEWIS, PLAINTIFF, v. JAMES FELZ AND CHARLES LOESSIG, DEFENDANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 10
Pages: 74–74

Head Matter:
ANDREW LEWIS, PLAINTIFF, v. JAMES FELZ AND CHARLES LOESSIG, DEFENDANTS.
Submitted October 16, 1931
Decided December 22, 1931.
Before ■ Justices Campbell, Lloyd and Bodine.
Bor the plaintiff, Harry Spitzer.
Bor the defendant, John G. Stoclcel.

Opinion:
Pee Cueiam.
Our examination of the evidence leads us to the conclusion that the verdict was supported by the clear weight of evidence. The damages, however, seem excessive, and unless the plaintiff consents to a reduction of his judgment to the sum of $2,400, a rule absolute for a new trial will be entered. Otherwise the rule will be discharged.