Case Name: Lorenzo Dominic RICHARDSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of NORTH CAROLINA, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-02-13
Citations: 465 F. App'x 242
Docket Number: No. 11-1744
Parties: Lorenzo Dominic RICHARDSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of NORTH CAROLINA, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 465
Pages: 242–243

Head Matter:
Lorenzo Dominic RICHARDSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of NORTH CAROLINA, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 11-1744.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 9, 2012.
Decided: Feb. 13, 2012.
Lorenzo Dominic Richardson, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Lorenzo Dominic Richardson appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Richardson v. North Carolina, No. 5:11-cv-00081-D (E.D.N.C. July 5, 2011). We deny Richardson's motion for relief, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.