Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dana Michael IDE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-02-07
Citations: 410 F. App'x 596
Docket Number: No. 10-4539
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dana Michael IDE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before SHEDD, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 410
Pages: 596–596

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dana Michael IDE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-4539.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 19, 2011.
Decided: Feb. 7, 2011.
Mary Lou Newberger, Federal Public Defender, Jonathan D. Byrne, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Christian M. Ca-pece, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. R. Booth Goodwin, II, United States Attorney, Blaire L. Malkin, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Dana Michael Ide appeals the district court's April 29, 2010 order revoking his supervised release and sentencing him to eleven months in prison. The sole issue raised on appeal is whether, under 18 U.S.C. § 3624(e) (2006), a term of supervised release is tolled while a defendant is held in pretrial detention on charges of which he is subsequently convicted. We recently held that such detention does toll the supervised release term. United States v. Ide, 624 F.3d 666, 667 (4th Cir.2010).
Under this authority, the petition for revocation of release filed in March 2010 was timely. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.