Case Name: INTERNATIONAL DESIGN & DISPLAY GROUP, INC., a Florida corporation, and Ian B. Quinton, Individually, Appellants, v. BARNETT BANK OF SOUTH FLORIDA, N.A., a national banking association, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-12-24
Citations: 590 So. 2d 554
Docket Number: No. 91-2694
Parties: INTERNATIONAL DESIGN & DISPLAY GROUP, INC., a Florida corporation, and Ian B. Quinton, Individually, Appellants, v. BARNETT BANK OF SOUTH FLORIDA, N.A., a national banking association, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and GODERICH, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 590
Pages: 554–555

Head Matter:
INTERNATIONAL DESIGN & DISPLAY GROUP, INC., a Florida corporation, and Ian B. Quinton, Individually, Appellants, v. BARNETT BANK OF SOUTH FLORIDA, N.A., a national banking association, Appellee.
No. 91-2694.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 24, 1991.
Robert C. Maland, P.A., and Roger M. Dunetz, Miami, for appellants.
Weil, Gotshal & Manges, and Bruce J. Berman, P.A., and David A. Pearl, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and GODERICH, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellee Barnett Bank-<rf"South Florida, N.A., correctly concedes that the trial court abused its discretion in setting aside the amended final judgment, Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.540(b), where, as here, Barnett Bank failed to allege facts justifying such relief and to submit affidavits or other sworn statements in support of its request for relief. Napco Paints, Inc. v. LaPorte (U.S.), Inc., 490 So.2d 1023 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Newkirk v. Florida Ins. Guar. Ass'n, Inc., 464 So.2d 1256 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Tompkins v. Kraemer, 402 So.2d 35 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). We, therefore, reverse the order setting aside the judgment. On remand, the trial court is directed to reinstate the judgment.
Reversed and remanded.