Case Name: F. W. Woolworth Co. v. United States; F. W. Woolworth Co. et al. v. United States; F. W. Woolworth Co. et al. v. United States
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1969-03-24
Citations: 62 Cust. Ct. 1075
Docket Number: No. P69/78; protests 67/6429 and 67/6430 (Philadelphia); No. P69/79; protests 67/43480, etc. (Los Angeles); No. P69/80; protests 67/90067, etc. (Honolulu)
Parties: F. W. Woolworth Co. v. United States, F. W. Woolworth Co. et al. v. United States, F. W. Woolworth Co. et al. v. United States,
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Volume: 62
Pages: 1075–1075

Head Matter:
Before the First Division,
March 24, 1969
No. P69/78.
protests 67/6429 and 67/6430 (Philadelphia).
No. P69/79.
protests 67/43480, etc. (Los Angeles).
No. P69/80.
protests 67/90067, etc. (Honolulu).
F. W. Woolworth Co. v. United States, F. W. Woolworth Co. et al. v. United States, F. W. Woolworth Co. et al. v. United States,

Opinion:
Watson, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by filie foregoing protests consists of artificial flowers in Chief value of plastic, assembled in the same manner as the plastic artificial flowers in Armbee Corporation et al. v. United States (60 Cust. Ct. 105, C.D. 3278) and Zunold Trading Corporation et al. v. United States (60 Cust. Ct. 112, C.D. 3279), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.