Case Name: CHARLES E. BRUNDAGE AND EDNA T. BRUNDAGE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE TOWNSHIP OF RANDOLPH, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY; FRANK THORBURN, BUILDING INSPECTOR OF THE TOWNSHIP OF RANDOLPH; AND THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWNSHIP OF RANDOLPH, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1959-09-28
Citations: 30 N.J. 555
Docket Number: 
Parties: CHARLES E. BRUNDAGE AND EDNA T. BRUNDAGE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE TOWNSHIP OF RANDOLPH, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY; FRANK THORBURN, BUILDING INSPECTOR OF THE TOWNSHIP OF RANDOLPH; AND THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWNSHIP OF RANDOLPH, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 30
Pages: 555–555

Head Matter:
CHARLES E. BRUNDAGE AND EDNA T. BRUNDAGE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE TOWNSHIP OF RANDOLPH, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY; FRANK THORBURN, BUILDING INSPECTOR OF THE TOWNSHIP OF RANDOLPH; AND THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWNSHIP OF RANDOLPH, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Argued September 15, 1959
Decided September 28, 1959.
Mr. Milton A. Dauber argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Carpenter, Bennett & Morrissey, attorneys).
Mr. Harry L. Sears argued the cause for the respondents (Messrs. Young & Sears, attorneys).

Opinion:
Pee Cueiam.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed by Judge Ereund in the court below.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintbaub, and Justices Bueling, Jacobs, Peancis, Peoctoe and Schettino — 6.
For reversal — Yone.