Case Name: CARSON HARBOR VILLAGE, LTD., a limited partnership dba Carson Harbor Village Mobilhome Park, Plaintiff-counter-defendant-Appellant, v. UNOCAL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corp., Defendant-cross-defendant, and City of Carson, Defendant-cross-defendant-cross-claimant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-02-13
Citations: 240 F.3d 841
Docket Number: Nos. 98-55056, 98-55210, 98-55213, 98-55215 and 98-55422
Parties: CARSON HARBOR VILLAGE, LTD., a limited partnership dba Carson Harbor Village Mobilhome Park, Plaintiff-counter-defendant-Appellant, v. UNOCAL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corp., Defendant-cross-defendant, and City of Carson, Defendant-cross-defendant-cross-claimant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 240
Pages: 841–841

Head Matter:
CARSON HARBOR VILLAGE, LTD., a limited partnership dba Carson Harbor Village Mobilhome Park, Plaintiff-counter-defendant-Appellant, v. UNOCAL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corp., Defendant-cross-defendant, and City of Carson, Defendant-cross-defendant-cross-claimant-Appellee.
Nos. 98-55056, 98-55210, 98-55213, 98-55215 and 98-55422.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Feb. 13, 2001.

Opinion:
ORDER
SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
. Judge Wardlaw was recused.