Case Name: Dolores Bartal, Appellant, v. Steven Bartal, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1983-10-17
Citations: 97 A.D.2d 451
Docket Number: 
Parties: Dolores Bartal, Appellant, v Steven Bartal, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 97
Pages: 451–451

Head Matter:
Dolores Bartal, Appellant, v Steven Bartal, Respondent.

Opinion:
In a matrimonial action, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Walsh, J.), entered May 23, 1983, which denied her motion to, in effect, reargue a prior motion for pendente lite relief. Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements. No appeal lies from an order denying reargument (Frankel v Frankel, 67 AD2d 719). Although plaintiff denominated her motion as one seeking renewal and reargument, no new facts were presented. Titone, J. P., Lazer, Thompson and Boyers, JJ., concur.