Case Name: SQUARE D COMPANY, Appellant, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, for Use and Benefit of DADELAND MEDICAL BUILDING, INC., et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-11-24
Citations: 610 So. 2d 522
Docket Number: No. 91-2865
Parties: SQUARE D COMPANY, Appellant, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, for Use and Benefit of DADELAND MEDICAL BUILDING, INC., et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and LEVY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 610
Pages: 522–522

Head Matter:
SQUARE D COMPANY, Appellant, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, for Use and Benefit of DADELAND MEDICAL BUILDING, INC., et al., Appellees.
No. 91-2865.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 24, 1992.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 26, 1993.
Greer, Homer & Bonner and Bruce W. Greer and Laura Besvinick and John Bor-go, Miami, for appellant.
Ponzoli, Wassenberg & Sperkacz and Zo-rian Sperkacz, Miami, for appellees.
Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and LEVY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Contrary to the appellant's contention, the Statute of Repose cannot be equated with subject matter jurisdiction. Therefore, unlike the question of subject matter jurisdiction, the rights accruing to a manufacturer by virtue of the Statute of Repose can be waived if not raised in a timely manner.
In this case, the appellant did not raise the Statute of Repose before the trial court in a timely manner. Accordingly, the applicability of the Statute of Repose to this case was not preserved for our review.
A review of the record fails to demonstrate any reversible error in connection with the other points raised by appellant.
Affirmed.