Case Name: THE INHABITANTS OF THE TOWNSHIP OF EATONTOWN, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. MONTILLON WOLLEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1887-11
Citations: 50 N.J.L. 177
Docket Number: 
Parties: THE INHABITANTS OF THE TOWNSHIP OF EATONTOWN, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. MONTILLON WOLLEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
Judges: For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Chief Justice, Mague, Reed, Scuddee, Van Syckel, Beown, Clement, McGregor, Pateeson, Whitakee. 11.
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 50
Pages: 177–177

Head Matter:
THE INHABITANTS OF THE TOWNSHIP OF EATONTOWN, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. MONTILLON WOLLEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
On error to the Supreme Court.
For opinion of the Supreme Court, see 20 Vroom 386.
For the plaintiffs in error, James Steen.
For the defendant in error, Wilbur A. Heisley.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment in this case should be affirmed, for the reasons given by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Chief Justice, Mague, Reed, Scuddee, Van Syckel, Beown, Clement, McGregor, Pateeson, Whitakee. 11.
For reversal — None.