Case Name: Carl BANGS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-01-30
Citations: 125 S.W.3d 403
Docket Number: No. WD 62053
Parties: Carl BANGS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before SMART, P.J., ULRICH and HARDWICK, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 125
Pages: 403–404

Head Matter:
Carl BANGS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 62053.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jan. 30, 2004.
Mark A. Grothoff, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
John M. Morris, III, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before SMART, P.J., ULRICH and HARDWICK, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Carl Bangs appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion following an evidentiary hearing. He contends the motion court erred in denying post-conviction relief based on the ineffectiveness of his trial and appellate counsel. Upon review of the record, we find no error and affirm the motion court's judgment. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, the parties have been provided with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision.
Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).