Case Name: Judy TATUM, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-04-17
Citations: 43 S.W.3d 880
Docket Number: No. ED 78549
Parties: Judy TATUM, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 43
Pages: 880–880

Head Matter:
Judy TATUM, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 78549.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District.
April 17, 2001.
Gwenda R. Robinson, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellants.
Jeremiah (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Karen L. Kramer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Judy Tatum (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying her Rule 24 .035 motion for post-conviction relief without a hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).