Case Name: Ronald W. HENDRICKS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2013-01-31
Citations: 108 So. 3d 608
Docket Number: No. SC10-1275
Parties: Ronald W. HENDRICKS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: POLSTON, C.J., and LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, and PERRY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 108
Pages: 608–609

Head Matter:
Ronald W. HENDRICKS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. SC10-1275.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Jan. 31, 2013.
William J. Sheppard, Daniel Gray Thomas, Matthew R. Kachergus and Bryan Everett Demaggio of Sheppard, White, Thomas & Kachergus, P.A., Jacksonville, FL, for Petitioner.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, and Thomas Howland Duffy, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, FL, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted review of the decision in Hendricks v. State, 34 So.3d 819 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss the review proceeding.
It is so ordered.
POLSTON, C.J., and LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, and PERRY, JJ., concur.
PARIENTE and LABARGA, JJ., recused.