Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Walter Weems, Jr., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1965-03-29
Citations: 23 A.D.2d 701
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Walter Weems, Jr., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 23
Pages: 701–701

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Walter Weems, Jr., Appellant.

Opinion:
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered July 31, 1963 after a jury trial, convicting him of three counts of robbery in the first degree and two counts of assault in the second degree with intent to commit rape, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. The evidence warranted the conviction. The defendant made no motion, prior to or at the trial, to suppress the evidence which he now contends was the fruit of an unlawful search and seizure; nor did he object to the introduction of said evidence at the trial. Therefore, his contention on this appeal that the evidence was the fruit of an unlawful search and seizure comes too late to be of any avail (People v. McCall, 19 A D 2d 630; People v. La Palia, 21 A D 2d 811; People v. Frióla, 11 N Y 2d 157). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.