Case Name: Cindy Lee GARCIA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware Corporation; Youtube, LLC, a California limited liability company, Defendants-Appellees, and Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, an individual, AKA Sam Bacile; Mark Basseley Youssef; Abanob Basseley Nakoula; Matthew Nekola; Ahmed Hamdy; Amal Nada; Daniel K. Caresman; Kritbag Difrat; Sobhi Bushra; Robert Bacily; Nicola Bacily; Thomas J. Tanas; Erwin Salameh; Youssef M. Basseley; Malid Ahlawi, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-03-13
Citations: 749 F.3d 1093
Docket Number: No. 12-57302
Parties: Cindy Lee GARCIA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware Corporation; Youtube, LLC, a California limited liability company, Defendants-Appellees, and Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, an individual, AKA Sam Bacile; Mark Basseley Youssef; Abanob Basseley Nakoula; Matthew Nekola; Ahmed Hamdy; Amal Nada; Daniel K. Caresman; Kritbag Difrat; Sobhi Bushra; Robert Bacily; Nicola Bacily; Thomas J. Tanas; Erwin Salameh; Youssef M. Basseley; Malid Ahlawi, Defendants.
Judges: Before: ALEX KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, RONALD M. GOULD and N. RANDY SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 749
Pages: 1093–1094

Head Matter:
Cindy Lee GARCIA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware Corporation; Youtube, LLC, a California limited liability company, Defendants-Appellees, and Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, an individual, AKA Sam Bacile; Mark Basseley Youssef; Abanob Basseley Nakoula; Matthew Nekola; Ahmed Hamdy; Amal Nada; Daniel K. Caresman; Kritbag Difrat; Sobhi Bushra; Robert Bacily; Nicola Bacily; Thomas J. Tanas; Erwin Salameh; Youssef M. Basseley; Malid Ahlawi, Defendants.
No. 12-57302.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
March 13, 2014.
M. Cris Armenta, Esquire, The Armenta Law Firm, Los Angeles, CA, Jason Allen Armstrong, Jason Armstrong Law Office, Bozeman, MT, Credence Sol, La Garenne, Chauvigny, France, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Timothy L. Alger, Esquire, Perkins Coie LLP, Palo Alto, CA, Sunita Bali, Esquire, Perkins Coie LLP, San Francisco, CA, Judith Coleman, Christopher Todd Handman, Neal Katyal, Sean M. Marotta, Dominic Francis Perella, Esquire, Hogan Lovells U.S. LLP, Washington, DC, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: ALEX KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, RONALD M. GOULD and N. RANDY SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
Within 21 days of the filing of this order, appellant shall file a response to the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc. The response shall comply with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32 and Ninth Circuit Rule 40-1.
The court grants leave pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 29(a) to any amicus wishing to file a brief bearing on the petition, so long as it is filed no later than 10 days after the filing of appellant's response, does not exceed 2,500 words and otherwise complies with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.