Case Name: Pamela MARSHALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doctor Francis J. HARVEY; LTC William Lukens, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-07-26
Citations: 234 F. App'x 72
Docket Number: No. 07-1186
Parties: Pamela MARSHALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doctor Francis J. HARVEY; LTC William Lukens, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 234
Pages: 72–73

Head Matter:
Pamela MARSHALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doctor Francis J. HARVEY; LTC William Lukens, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 07-1186.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 24, 2007.
Decided: July 26, 2007.
Pamela Marshall, Appellant Pro Se. Larry Lee Gregg, Assistant United States Attorney, Kevin Jason Mikolashek, Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Pamela Marshall appeals the district court's order granting her former federal employer's motion for summary judgment as to her petition for review of the Merit System Protection Board's decision and on her employment discrimination claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Marshall v. Harvey, No. 1:06-cv-011600-LMB (E.D. Va. Feb. 9, 2007; filed Feb. 15, 2007 & entered Feb. 16, 2007). We deny Marshall's motion to expedite as moot and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.