Case Name: Hancock Gross Mfg., Inc. v. United States, protests 63/18774 and 63/19444 (Philadelphia); Hancock Gross Mfg., Inc., and Banner Hardware v. United States, protests 65/522 and 64/12275 (Philadelphia); Durst Industries, Inc., et al. v. United States, protests 65/7229, etc. (New York); New York Merchandise Co., Inc., et al. v. United States, protests 65/24799, etc. (Los Angeles)
Court: United States Customs Court
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1966-10-20
Citations: 57 Cust. Ct. 821
Docket Number: No. P66/284; No. P66/285; No. P66/286; No. P66/287
Parties: Hancock Gross Mfg., Inc. v. United States, protests 63/18774 and 63/19444 (Philadelphia). Hancock Gross Mfg., Inc., and Banner Hardware v. United States, protests 65/522 and 64/12275 (Philadelphia). Durst Industries, Inc., et al. v. United States, protests 65/7229, etc. (New York). New York Merchandise Co., Inc., et al. v. United States, protests 65/24799, etc. (Los Angeles).
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Customs Court Reports
Volume: 57
Pages: 821–821

Head Matter:
Before the Second Division,
October 20, 1966
No. P66/284. —
No. P66/285. —
No. P66/286. —
No. P66/287. —
Hancock Gross Mfg., Inc. v. United States, protests 63/18774 and 63/19444 (Philadelphia). Hancock Gross Mfg., Inc., and Banner Hardware v. United States, protests 65/522 and 64/12275 (Philadelphia). Durst Industries, Inc., et al. v. United States, protests 65/7229, etc. (New York). New York Merchandise Co., Inc., et al. v. United States, protests 65/24799, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion:
Rao, C. J.
In accordance with stipulation of council that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of hose nozzles similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. Lipman's (52 CCPA 59, C.A.D. 859), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.