Case Name: Dorothy Marion, Appellant, v. City of New York et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2000-03-09
Citations: 270 A.D.2d 53
Docket Number: 
Parties: Dorothy Marion, Appellant, v City of New York et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 270
Pages: 53–54

Head Matter:
Dorothy Marion, Appellant, v City of New York et al., Respondents.
[704 NYS2d 59]

Opinion:
—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Douglas McKeon, J.), entered December 28, 1998, which, upon reargument, granted defendant New York City Housing Authority's motion to vacate an order of the same court and Justice, entered August 31, 1998, inter alia, dismissing plaintiffs complaint with leave to refile within 30 days, and granted defendants' prior cross motion to dismiss the complaint with prejudice, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of denying defendant's cross motion and granting plaintiff leave to recommence her action within the 120-day time-frame set forth in CPLR former 306-b (b), and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
The timely filing by plaintiff of proof of service upon defendant Housing Authority satisfied the requirements of CPLR former 306-b (a), regardless of the fact that service was later determined to have been effected at a wrong address (Zaleski v Mlynarkiewicz, 255 AD2d 379; Reyes v Harris Press & Shear, 256 AD2d 564). Thus, the automatic dismissal provision of CPLR former 306-b (a) was inapplicable. Moreover, because CPLR former 306-b contained a saving provision (CPLR former 306-b [b]) affording plaintiff an additional 120 days to recommence her action, and that, additional period had not yet expired as of the date of the appealed order, the motion court erred in holding that a new action against defendant Housing Authority was time-barred. Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Ellerin, Lerner and Buckley, JJ.,