Case Name: NATIONAL RECYCLING COALITION, INC. and Environmental Defense Fund, Inc., Petitioners, v. William K. REILLY, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Respondent, American Paper Institute, Intervenor
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1989-12-12
Citations: 890 F.2d 1242
Docket Number: No. 88-1511
Parties: NATIONAL RECYCLING COALITION, INC. and Environmental Defense Fund, Inc., Petitioners, v. William K. REILLY, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Respondent, American Paper Institute, Intervenor.
Judges: Before: WALD, Chief Judge and MIKVA, EDWARDS, RUTH B. GINSBURG, SILBERMAN, BUCKLEY, WILLIAMS, D.H. GINSBURG and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 890
Pages: 1242–1244

Head Matter:
NATIONAL RECYCLING COALITION, INC. and Environmental Defense Fund, Inc., Petitioners, v. William K. REILLY, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Respondent, American Paper Institute, Intervenor.
No. 88-1511.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Dec. 12, 1989.

Opinion:
ON PETITIONERS' SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC.
Before: WALD, Chief Judge and MIKVA, EDWARDS, RUTH B. GINSBURG, SILBERMAN, BUCKLEY, WILLIAMS, D.H. GINSBURG and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Petitioners' Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc has been circulated to the full Court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular, active service did not vote in favor of the suggestion. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is
ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the suggestion is denied.
A statement of Circuit Judge STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, joined in by Circuit Judge SENTELLE is attached.
A dissenting statement by Chief Judge WALD is attached.