Case Name: Gilberto Martin BRAVO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1986-12-30
Citations: 499 So. 2d 71
Docket Number: No. 86-1340
Parties: Gilberto Martin BRAVO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before BASKIN, DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 499
Pages: 71–71

Head Matter:
Gilberto Martin BRAVO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 86-1340.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 30, 1986.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and May L. Cain, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Richard L. Polin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before BASKIN, DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the adjudication and sentence without prejudice to defendant raising the issue pertaining to ineffectiveness of counsel in a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The remaining point lacks merit. See Mixon v. State, 497 So.2d 720 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Stokes v. State, 476 So.2d 313 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).
Affirmed.