Case Name: Seth A. SUMMERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2016-08-30
Citations: 497 S.W.3d 357
Docket Number: No. ED 103568
Parties: Seth A. SUMMERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Angela T. Quigless, P.J. and Robert G. Dowd, Jr. and Lisa Van Amburg, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 497
Pages: 357–358

Head Matter:
Seth A. SUMMERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 103568
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Filed: August 30, 2016
Mark A. Grothoff, Woodrail Centre, Columbia, MO, Attorneys for Appellant
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent
Before Angela T. Quigless, P.J. and Robert G. Dowd, Jr. and Lisa Van Amburg, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Seth Summers appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm.
An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).