Case Name: In the Matter of Alexander A. Pansa et al., Appellants, v. Armand Damiano et al., Constituting the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Utica, Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1964-09-24
Citations: 21 A.D.2d 974
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Alexander A. Pansa et al., Appellants, v. Armand Damiano et al., Constituting the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Utica, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 21
Pages: 974–974

Head Matter:
(September 24, 1964)
In the Matter of Alexander A. Pansa et al., Appellants, v. Armand Damiano et al., Constituting the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Utica, Respondents.

Opinion:
Upon remission from the Court of Appeals, order unanimously affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. Memorandum: Our former decision was based upon a finding that the appellants had not timely taken their appeal to the Zoning Board of Appeals. In the light of the recent decision of the Court of Appeals herein (14 N Y 2d 356), we turn to the other issues in the case. We find that the determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals, which held that the space- between the west wall of the new structure and the east line of appellants' property is a side yard and is not a rear yard within the meaning of section 4 of article VII of the Zoning Ordinance, is arbitrary and should be annulled. In all other respects the determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals is confirmed. (Appeal from order of Oneida Special Term dismissing the petition.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Noonan, JJ.