Case Name: Barry J. BLUEFELD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Barry S. COHEN; Joel S. Meisel; David H. Cohen, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-02-27
Citations: 678 F. App'x 100
Docket Number: No. 16-2207
Parties: Barry J. BLUEFELD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Barry S. COHEN; Joel S. Meisel; David H. Cohen, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 678
Pages: 100–101

Head Matter:
Barry J. BLUEFELD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Barry S. COHEN; Joel S. Meisel; David H. Cohen, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-2207
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: February 23, 2017
Decided: February 27, 2017
Barry J. Bluefeld, Appellant Pro Se.
Matthew D. Matkov, SALTZ MATKOV PC, Wayne, Pennsylvania, for Appellees.
Before SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Barry J. Bluefeld seeks to appeal the district court's order granting the Defendants' motion to strike certain correspondence. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P, 64(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Bluefeld seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny the Appellees' motions to strike and for sane- tions, and we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED