Case Name: Benjamin DAVIS, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. W. ROADHEAVER, Cpl.; Solstice, Cpl.; Tyler, Capt.; Durst, Lt.; Llewelyn, Lt.; CROSS, Sgt., Individually and in their Official Capacities, Defendants-Appellees, v. Office of the Attorney General, Party-in-Interest
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-04-06
Citations: 421 F. App'x 289
Docket Number: No. 10-7746
Parties: Benjamin DAVIS, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. W. ROADHEAVER, Cpl.; Solstice, Cpl.; Tyler, Capt.; Durst, Lt.; Llewelyn, Lt.; CROSS, Sgt., Individually and in their Official Capacities, Defendants-Appellees, v. Office of the Attorney General, Party-in-Interest.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 421
Pages: 289–289

Head Matter:
Benjamin DAVIS, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. W. ROADHEAVER, Cpl.; Solstice, Cpl.; Tyler, Capt.; Durst, Lt.; Llewelyn, Lt.; CROSS, Sgt., Individually and in their Official Capacities, Defendants-Appellees, v. Office of the Attorney General, Party-in-Interest.
No. 10-7746.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 31, 2011.
Decided: April 6, 2011.
Benjamin Davis, III, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Benjamin Davis, III, appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. Rodeheaver, No. 1:09-cv-01936-WDQ (D.Md. Nov. 18, 2010); Davis v. Rodeheaver, No. 1:09-cv-01936-WDQ, 2010 WL 2817054 (D.Md. July 16, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.