Case Name: Charles L. CLEMENTS, Jr., etc., Appellant, v. SUN BANK/MIAMI, N.A., etc., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-04-18
Citations: 545 So. 2d 308
Docket Number: No. 88-981
Parties: Charles L. CLEMENTS, Jr., etc., Appellant, v. SUN BANK/MIAMI, N.A., etc., Appellees.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., BARKDULL, J., and JOHN W. DELL, Associate Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 545
Pages: 308–309

Head Matter:
Charles L. CLEMENTS, Jr., etc., Appellant, v. SUN BANK/MIAMI, N.A., etc., Appellees.
No. 88-981.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Opinion filed April 18, 1989.
Rehearing Denied July 5, 1989.
Walton, Lantaff, Schroeder & Carson and G. Bart Billbrough, Miami, for appellant.
Fowler, White, Burnett, Hurley, Banick & Strickroot and Roger Traynor and John R. Kelso, Miami, for appellees.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., BARKDULL, J., and JOHN W. DELL, Associate Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The record presents genuine issues of material fact as to whether the appellee acted with reasonable care and expedition in undertaking a reinvestment program of trust assets as represented to the appellant. See Banfield v. Addington, 104 Fla. 661, 140 So. 893 (1932); Floyd v. Video Barn, Inc., 538 So.2d 1322 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). The summary judgment under review is therefore reversed.