Case Name: Lorenzo RICHARDSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-12-18
Citations: 500 F. App'x 235
Docket Number: No. 12-1985
Parties: Lorenzo RICHARDSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 500
Pages: 235–235

Head Matter:
Lorenzo RICHARDSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 12-1985.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 18, 2012.
Decided: Dec. 18, 2012.
Lorenzo Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Mark J. Goldenberg, Social Security Administration, Baltimore, Maryland, for Ap-pellee.
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Lorenzo Richardson appeals the district court's order denying his request for mandamus relief and affirming the Commissioner's denial of disability insurance benefits. We must uphold the decision to deny benefits if the decision is supported by substantial evidence and the correct law was applied. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2006); Johnson v. Barnhart, 434 F.3d 650, 653 (4th Cir.2005) (per curiam). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Richardson v. Soc. Sec. Admin., No. 5:11-cv-00257-BO (E.D.N.C. July 26, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.