Case Name: Cynthia L. BUTTS, Plaintiff-Appellant v. DRESS BARN, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-05-17
Citations: 470 F. App'x 388
Docket Number: No. 11-30739
Parties: Cynthia L. BUTTS, Plaintiff-Appellant v. DRESS BARN, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 470
Pages: 388–389

Head Matter:
Cynthia L. BUTTS, Plaintiff-Appellant v. DRESS BARN, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 11-30739
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
May 17, 2012.
Cynthia L. Butts, Montgomery, AL, pro se.
Kate Lesley Birenbaum, Seyfarth Shaw, L.L.P., Houston, TX, Jason Blance Nichols, Cook, Yancey, King & Galloway, a P.L.C., Shreveport, LA, for Defendants Appellee.
Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The plaintiff has been given extensive attention and opportunity to proceed with her claim despite her refusal to respond to orders and consent to discovery. Judgment was rendered dismissing the case for failure to prosecute.
Plaintiff presents this court no legal error by the district court. Consequently . this court can only affirm.
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.