Case Name: Ernst ANICET, Petitioner, v. Julie JONES, etc., et al., Respondents.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2018-05-09
Citations: 245 So. 3d 992
Docket Number: No. 3D18–0047
Parties: Ernst ANICET, Petitioner,
v.
Julie JONES, etc., et al., Respondents.
Judges: Before FERNANDEZ, LOGUE, and LINDSEY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 245
Pages: 992–992

Head Matter:
Ernst ANICET, Petitioner,
v.
Julie JONES, etc., et al., Respondents.
No. 3D18-0047
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Opinion filed May 9, 2018
Ernst Anicet, in proper person.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent The State of Florida.
Before FERNANDEZ, LOGUE, and LINDSEY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Denied. See Barnard v. State, 949 So.2d 250, 251 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) ("Habeas corpus may not be used to file successive 3.850 motions or to raise issues which would be untimely if considered as a motion for postconviction relief under rule 3.850." (citing Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236, 1245-46 (Fla. 2004) ) ); see also Hernandez v. State, 990 So.2d 1116, 1118 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) ("However, even if we were to address the petition on the merits, it would be denied as the ground raised is refuted by the record.").