Case Name: David R. D'Alessandro, Individually and as Limited Administrator of the Estate of Kimberly A. D'Alessandro, Deceased, Respondent, v. Eastman Kodak Company et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 1.); David R. D'Alessandro, Individually and as Limited Administrator of the Estate of Kimberly A. D'Alessandro, Deceased, Respondent, v. Eastman Kodak Company et al., Appellants. (Action No. 4.); David R. D'Alessandro, Individually and as Limited Administrator of the Estate of Kimberly A. D'Alessandro, Deceased, Respondent-Appellant, v. Eastman Kodak Company, Appellant, and Frank Mongeon, Jr., Respondent. (Action No. 5.)
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1998-12-31
Citations: 256 A.D.2d 1241
Docket Number: Appeal No. 1
Parties: David R. D’Alessandro, Individually and as Limited Administrator of the Estate of Kimberly A. D’Alessandro, Deceased, Respondent, v Eastman Kodak Company et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 1.) David R. D’Alessandro, Individually and as Limited Administrator of the Estate of Kimberly A. D’Alessandro, Deceased, Respondent, v Eastman Kodak Company et al., Appellants. (Action No. 4.) David R. D’Alessandro, Individually and as Limited Administrator of the Estate of Kimberly A. D’Alessandro, Deceased, Respondent-Appellant, v Eastman Kodak Company, Appellant, and Frank Mongeon, Jr., Respondent. (Action No. 5.)
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 256
Pages: 1241–1242

Head Matter:
David R. D’Alessandro, Individually and as Limited Administrator of the Estate of Kimberly A. D’Alessandro, Deceased, Respondent, v Eastman Kodak Company et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 1.) David R. D’Alessandro, Individually and as Limited Administrator of the Estate of Kimberly A. D’Alessandro, Deceased, Respondent, v Eastman Kodak Company et al., Appellants. (Action No. 4.) David R. D’Alessandro, Individually and as Limited Administrator of the Estate of Kimberly A. D’Alessandro, Deceased, Respondent-Appellant, v Eastman Kodak Company, Appellant, and Frank Mongeon, Jr., Respondent. (Action No. 5.)
(Appeal No. 1.)
[683 NYS2d 463]

Opinion:
—Cross appeal unanimously dismissed (see, Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988; see also, Chase Manhattan Bank v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567; CPLR 5501 [a] [1]) and order affirmed without costs. (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Fisher, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present— Green, J. P., Pine, Wisner, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.