Case Name: Baker, Appellant, v. New York Cent. & H. R. R. Co., Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1892-11-22
Citations: 20 N.Y.S. 986
Docket Number: 
Parties: Baker, Appellant, v. New York Cent. & H. R. R. Co., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 20
Pages: 986–986

Head Matter:
Baker, Appellant, v. New York Cent. & H. R. R. Co., Respondent.
(Supreme Court, General Term, Third Department.
November 22, 1892.)
Action by John Baker against the New York Central & Hudson River Railway Company for injuries received by defendant’s negligence. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
Argued before Mayham, P. J., and Putnam and Herrick, JJ.
Parker & Fiero, (J. Newton Fiero, of counsel,) for appellant. Harris & Rudd, (Hamilton Harris, of counsel,) for respondent.

Opinion:
Herrick, J.
I cannot see any material difference between this case and that of Arnold v. Canal Co., 125 N. Y. 15, 25 N. E. Rep. 1064, and I think the judgment should be affirmed. Neither do I see any reason for writing an opinion. All concur.