Case Name: Phillip Anthony DAYE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. B.J. BARNES, Sheriff; Willardean Dula, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-09-11
Citations: 47 F. App'x 211
Docket Number: No. 02-6941
Parties: Phillip Anthony DAYE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. B.J. BARNES, Sheriff; Willardean Dula, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 47
Pages: 211–212

Head Matter:
Phillip Anthony DAYE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. B.J. BARNES, Sheriff; Willardean Dula, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 02-6941.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 5, 2002.
Decided Sept. 11, 2002.
Phillip Anthony Daye, Appellant Pro Se. Susan D. Moore, County Attorney’s Office, Greensboro, North Carolina; Perry Cleveland Henson, Sr., Amanda Mary Willis, Henson & Henson, L.L.P., Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Phillip Anthony Daye appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2002) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp.2002). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Daye v. Barnes, No. CA-01-94-1 (M.D.N.C. May 29, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.