Case Name: Robert D. Osterhout et al., Appellants, v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1983-06-09
Citations: 59 N.Y.2d 846
Docket Number: 
Parties: Robert D. Osterhout et al., Appellants, v Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 59
Pages: 846–847

Head Matter:
Robert D. Osterhout et al., Appellants, v Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, Respondent.
Decided June 9, 1983
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Mahlon D. Clements for appellants.
Robert Small for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (91 AD2d 1172).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler and Meyer. Taking no part: Judge Simons.