Case Name: Richard L. BARNES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of WEST VIRGINIA; Tom Ballard; B.L. Mankins, Trooper; Allen Workman, Magistrate, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-02-08
Citations: 3 F. App'x 81
Docket Number: No. 00-7192
Parties: Richard L. BARNES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of WEST VIRGINIA; Tom Ballard; B.L. Mankins, Trooper; Allen Workman, Magistrate, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 3
Pages: 81–81

Head Matter:
Richard L. BARNES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of WEST VIRGINIA; Tom Ballard; B.L. Mankins, Trooper; Allen Workman, Magistrate, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 00-7192.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 29, 2000.
Decided Feb. 8, 2001.
Richard L. Barnes, pro se.
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Richard L. Barnes appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Barnes v. West Virginia, No. CA-99-978-5 (S.D.W.Va. Aug. 10, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.