Case Name: In the Matter of Steuben County Support Collection Unit, on Behalf of Steuben County Department of Social Services/Violet K. Stevens, Respondent, v. Robin G. Bartholomew, Appellant; In the Matter of Robin G. Bartholomew, Appellant, v. Steuben County Support Collection Unit, on Behalf of Steuben County Department of Social Services/Violet K. Stevens, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2003-12-31
Citations: 2 A.D.3d 1434
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Steuben County Support Collection Unit, on Behalf of Steuben County Department of Social Services/Violet K. Stevens, Respondent, v Robin G. Bartholomew, Appellant. In the Matter of Robin G. Bartholomew, Appellant, v Steuben County Support Collection Unit, on Behalf of Steuben County Department of Social Services/ Violet K. Stevens, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 2
Pages: 1434–1435

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Steuben County Support Collection Unit, on Behalf of Steuben County Department of Social Services/Violet K. Stevens, Respondent, v Robin G. Bartholomew, Appellant. In the Matter of Robin G. Bartholomew, Appellant, v Steuben County Support Collection Unit, on Behalf of Steuben County Department of Social Services/ Violet K. Stevens, Respondent.
[768 NYS2d 908]

Opinion:
— Appeal from an order of Family Court, Steuben County (Furfure, J.), entered December 2, 2002, which denied the objections of respondent-petitioner to the order of the Hearing Examiner.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Respondent-petitioner (respondent) appeals from an order denying his objections to the order of the Hearing Examiner. That order was entered on the consent of the parties and thus is not subject to the review of either Family Court or this Court (see Matter of Oropallo v Tecler, 263 AD2d 716, 718 [1999]). The record does not support the contention of respondent that he was denied effective assistance of counsel (see Batson v Batson, 277 AD2d 750, 752 [2000]). Present—Green, J.P., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Hayes, JJ.