Case Name: Jodka, Appellant, v. The City of Cleveland et al., Appellees
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2015-03-12
Citations: 143 Ohio St. 3d 50
Docket Number: No. 2014-0636
Parties: Jodka, Appellant, v. The City of Cleveland et al., Appellees.
Judges: O’Connor, C.J., and Lanzinger, Kennedy, and French, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 143
Pages: 50–50

Head Matter:
Jodka, Appellant, v. The City of Cleveland et al., Appellees.
[Cite as Jodka v. Cleveland, 143 Ohio St.3d 50, 2015-Ohio-860.]
(No. 2014-0636
Submitted July 9, 2014
Decided March 12, 2015.)
Mayle, Ray & Mayle, L.L.C., Andrew R. Mayle, Jeremiah S. Ray, and Ronald J. Mayle; and Murray & Murray Co., L.P.A., and John T. Murray, for appellant.
Barbara Langhenry, Director of Law, and Gary Singletary, Assistant Director of Law, for appellee city of Cleveland.
Baker & Hostetler, L.L.P., Gregory V. Mersol, and Chris Bator, for appellees Affiliated Computer Services, Inc., Boulder Acquisition Corp., and Xerox Corp.

Opinion:
{¶ 1} This cause, here on appeal from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, was considered in the manner prescribed by law. On consideration thereof, the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Walker v. Toledo, 143 Ohio St.3d 420, 2014-Ohio-5461, 39 N.E.3d 474, and this cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.
O'Connor, C.J., and Lanzinger, Kennedy, and French, JJ., concur.
Pfeifer and O'Neill, JJ., dissent.
O'Donnell, J., not participating.