Case Name: The State ex rel. Bray, Appellant, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellees
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2004-03-03
Citations: 101 Ohio St. 3d 203
Docket Number: No. 2003-1222
Parties: The State ex rel. Bray, Appellant, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellees.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 101
Pages: 203–203

Head Matter:
The State ex rel. Bray, Appellant, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellees.
[Cite as State ex rel. Bray v. Indus. Comm., 101 Ohio St.3d 203, 2004-Ohio-709.]
(No. 2003-1222
Submitted January 12, 2004
Decided March 3, 2004.)
Harris & Burgin, L.P.A., and Andrea L. Burns, for appellant.
Jim Petro, Attorney General, and Phil Wright Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission.
Michael K. Allen, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, Thomas E. Deye and Susan Marie Gertz, Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for appellee Simon L. Leis Jr.

Opinion:
{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.
Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor and O'Donnell, JJ., concur.
Resnick, J., dissents, would reverse, and would order relief pursuant to State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666.
F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent, would reverse, and would order relief pursuant to State ex rel. Noll v. Indus. Comm. (1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 203, 567 N.E.2d 245.