Case Name: Arthur Franklin GRIFFIN, Petitioner, v. M R & R TRUCKING COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1968-01-24
Citations: 206 So. 2d 210
Docket Number: No. 36579
Parties: Arthur Franklin GRIFFIN, Petitioner, v. M R & R TRUCKING COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Respondent.
Judges: CALDWELL, C. J., and THOMAS, DREW, THORNAL and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 206
Pages: 210–211

Head Matter:
Arthur Franklin GRIFFIN, Petitioner, v. M R & R TRUCKING COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Respondent.
No. 36579.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Jan. 24, 1968.
Logue, Bennett & Williams, Panama City, and William J. Rish, Port St. Joe, for petitioner.
Benjamin W. Redding, of Barron & Hilton, Panama City, and Wilfred C. Varn, of Ervin, Pennington, Varn & Jacobs, Tallahassee, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard oral argument of the parties. After argument and upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
CALDWELL, C. J., and THOMAS, DREW, THORNAL and ADAMS, JJ., concur.