Case Name: Eric DECKINGER, Appellant, v. EXPORT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Can-Flo International, d/b/a Lantana Peat & Soil, G.C. Hauling, Inc., Eugene Caruso, Anna Caruso and Lac Enterprises, Inc., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1997-11-26
Citations: 701 So. 2d 670
Docket Number: No. 97-0849
Parties: Eric DECKINGER, Appellant, v. EXPORT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Can-Flo International, d/b/a Lantana Peat & Soil, G.C. Hauling, Inc., Eugene Caruso, Anna Caruso and Lac Enterprises, Inc., Appellees.
Judges: DELL, J., concurs.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 701
Pages: 670–671

Head Matter:
Eric DECKINGER, Appellant, v. EXPORT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Can-Flo International, d/b/a Lantana Peat & Soil, G.C. Hauling, Inc., Eugene Caruso, Anna Caruso and Lac Enterprises, Inc., Appellees.
No. 97-0849.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Nov. 26, 1997.
Russell S. Bohn of Caruso, Burlington, Bohn & Compiani, P.A., West Palm Beach, and Robert I. Claire, Boca Raton, for appellant.
Norman L. Schroeder, II of Norman L. Schroeder, II, P.A., Lake Worth, for appel-lees.

Opinion:
POLEN, Judge.
We affirm the order of the trial court denying appellant's motion to temporarily enjoin the sale of stock pledged to secure a debt. The order was entered after an evidentiary hearing, conducted pursuant to our remand requiring such a hearing in Kedac, Inc. v. Export Development Corp., 685 So.2d 97 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (Deckinger I).
We agree with Judge Warner's dissent that the trial court incorrectly relied on ap-pellees' argument of collateral estoppel based on the bankruptcy proceedings. However, we believe the record supports the trial court's reliance on the principle that appellants have an adequate remedy at law in denying the injunction.
AFFIRMED.
DELL, J., concurs.
WARNER, J., dissents with opinion.