Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mohammed HAMMOUDE, a/k/a Mohammad Hammoudeh, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-10-26
Citations: 146 F. App'x 687
Docket Number: No. 05-6045
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Mohammed HAMMOUDE, a/k/a Mohammad Hammoudeh, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 146
Pages: 687–687

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Mohammed HAMMOUDE, a/k/a Mohammad Hammoudeh, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 05-6045.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 19, 2005.
Decided Oct. 26, 2005.
Mohammed Hammoude, Appellant Pro Se. Robert William Wiechering, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Mohammed Hammoude appeals the district court's order denying his motion for termination of supervised release. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion or reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Hammoude, CR-00-9-A (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 10, 2005; entered Jan. 12, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED