Case Name: ESTATE OF ROBERT FREDERICK ET AL. v. GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, ELECTRIC BOAT DIVISION, ET AL.
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1996-12-31
Citations: 44 Conn. App. 124
Docket Number: 14772
Parties: ESTATE OF ROBERT FREDERICK ET AL. v. GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, ELECTRIC BOAT DIVISION, ET AL.
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Appellate Reports
Volume: 44
Pages: 124–125

Head Matter:
ESTATE OF ROBERT FREDERICK ET AL. v. GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, ELECTRIC BOAT DIVISION, ET AL.
(14772)
Dupont, C. X, and Foti, Lavery, Landau, Heiman, Spear and Hennessy, Js.
Argued March 19
reargued September 11
officially released December 31, 1996
Lucas D. Strunk, for the appellants (named defendant et al.).
Stephen C. Embry, with whom, on the brief, was Gerard R. Rued, for the appellees (plaintiffs).
December 31, 1996, the date that this decision was released as a slip opinion, is the operative date for all substantive and procedural purposes.

Opinion:
HEIMAN, J.
This case is controlled by our opinion in Green v. General Dynamics Corp., 44 Conn. App. 112, 687 A.2d 550 (1996).
The decision of the compensation review board is reversed and the case is remanded with direction to deny the plaintiffs' claim for benefits.
In this opinion FOTI, LANDAU and HENNESSY, Js., concurred.
DUPONT, C. J.,
with whom LAVERY and SPEAR, Js., join, dissenting. For the reasons stated in our dissent in Green v. General Dynamics Corp., 44 Conn. App. 112, 687 A.2d 550 (1996), we respectfully dissent.