Case Name: Abdul HAMID, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-01-24
Citations: 23 F. App'x 879
Docket Number: No. 00-71493; INS No. A70-095-823
Parties: Abdul HAMID, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 23
Pages: 879–879

Head Matter:
Abdul HAMID, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.
No. 00-71493.
INS No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 14, 2002 .
Decided Jan. 24, 2002.
Before KLEINFELD, HAWKINS, and SILVERMAN, Circuit dudges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Abdul Hamid, a native and citizen of Pakistan, appeals from the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") decision denying his motion to reopen. Because the transitional rules apply, this court has jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a). See Socop-Gonzalez v. INS, 272 F.3d 1176, 1183 (9th Cir.2001) (en banc). We review for an abuse of discretion the BIA's denial of a motion to reopen, id. at 1187, and we deny the petition.
Because Hamid filed his motion to reopen past the 90-day deadline set forth in 8 C.F.R. § 3.2(c)(2) (2000), and has advanced no argument for equitable tolling, the BIA properly denied his motion as untimely. See Socop-Gonzalez, 272 F.3d at 1193.
Hamid's contentions on appeal lack merit. See Ram v. INS, 243 F.3d 510 (9th Cir.2001).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.