Case Name: A. Jay CRISTOL, an individual and A. Jay Cristol, on behalf of himself and all those persons similarly situated, Appellants, v. The CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a municipal corporation, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1971-02-16
Citations: 245 So. 2d 132
Docket Number: No. 70-1261
Parties: A. Jay CRISTOL, an individual and A. Jay Cristol, on behalf of himself and all those persons similarly situated, Appellants, v. The CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a municipal corporation, Appellee.
Judges: Before PEARSON, C. J, and CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 245
Pages: 132–133

Head Matter:
A. Jay CRISTOL, an individual and A. Jay Cristol, on behalf of himself and all those persons similarly situated, Appellants, v. The CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a municipal corporation, Appellee.
No. 70-1261.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 16, 1971.
Rehearing Denied March 26, 1971.
Cristol, Rose & Aldrich, Miami, for appellants.
Joseph A. Wanick, City Atty., and Lionel Barnet, Asst. City Atty., for appellee.
Before PEARSON, C. J, and CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed upon authority of the rule stated in Charles Sales Corp. v. Rovenger, Fla. 1956, 88 So.2d 551; RCP 1.310(b), 30 F.S.A.