Case Name: Francis W. SCHWARTZ, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Bonnie Jo (Schwartz) SUTTON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1991-02-13
Citations: 803 S.W.2d 195
Docket Number: No. 58226
Parties: Francis W. SCHWARTZ, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Bonnie Jo (Schwartz) SUTTON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 803
Pages: 195–195

Head Matter:
Francis W. SCHWARTZ, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Bonnie Jo (Schwartz) SUTTON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 58226.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern Disrict, Northern Division.
Feb. 13, 1991.
Russell John Kruse, Palmyra, for defendant-appellant.
james Daniel Terrell, Hannibal, for plaintiff-respondent,

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from the trial court's judgment in an action by plaintiff, the ex-wife of defendant, to collect reimbursement for payment of hospitalization and related doctor bills incurred when the parties' son was hospitalized.
The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).