Case Name: FLOYD v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1937-06-02
Citations: 106 S.W.2d 301
Docket Number: No. 19123
Parties: FLOYD v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 106
Pages: 301–301

Head Matter:
FLOYD v. STATE.
No. 19123.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
June 2, 1937.
Raymond Wilson, of Fort Worth, for appellant.
Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
HAWKINS, Judge.
On the 2d day of May, 1934, on a plea of guilty, appellant was convicted in criminal district court of Tarrant county, Tex., of the offense of burglary, and his punishment assessed at five years' imprisonment in the penitentiary.- Sentence was suspended during the good behavior of appellant. On the 13th day' of April, 1936, the criminal district attorney- of Tar-rant county-filed in the'court of conviction a motion praying that said suspended sentence be revoked, alleging that appellant was on the 23d day -of- March, 1936; convicted of a felony in United States "District Court at New Orleans in the state of Louisiána. A hearing- on said'motion was had on the 27 th day of''February, -1937, "and the court found' that during: the -sus'•pension of. Appellant's sentence---heAfiad been corfricte'd-fin'-United- States - District Court of-a-felony;'-to-'-wit, violation of-the -Natfonál'^M-otíír • Ve'h'iclfe-<3.-Theft-<'.-'Act-é (¿8 U.S.C.A. § 408). The suspended sentence was revoked and appellant sentenced under the original conviction to imprisonment in the penitentiary for not less than two nor more than five years.
No statement of facts or bills of exception are brought forward. The record shows that all proceedings were in accord with article 779, C.C.P., relating to the revocation of a suspended sentence.
The judgment is affirmed.