Case Name: STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. TERRY L. WELLS, Defendant
Court: Montana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Montana
Decision Date: 2000-11-27
Citations: 304 Mont. 101
Docket Number: NO. BDC-93-183
Parties: STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. TERRY L. WELLS, Defendant.
Judges: Chairman, Hon. Jeffrey H. Langton, Member, Hon. David Cybulski and Alt. Member, Hon. John Whelan.
Reporter: Montana Reports
Volume: 304
Pages: 101–102

Head Matter:
STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. TERRY L. WELLS, Defendant.
NO. BDC-93-183
Decision

Opinion:
On March 28, 2000, the defendant was sentenced to a five (5) year commitment to the Department of Corrections.
On November 2,2000, the defendant's application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
The defendant was present and was represented by John Keith. The state was represented by Susan Brooke.
Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.
Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that "the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive." (§46-18-904(3), MCA).
Done in open Court this 2nd day of November, 2000.
DATED this 27th day of November, 2000.
The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.
Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.
Chairman, Hon. Jeffrey H. Langton, Member, Hon. David Cybulski and Alt. Member, Hon. John Whelan.