Case Name: In re Cato
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1960-05-18
Citations: 171 Ohio St. 15
Docket Number: No. 36312
Parties: In re Cato.
Judges: Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and Peck, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, New Service
Volume: 171
Pages: 15–16

Head Matter:
In re Cato.
(No. 36312
Decided May 18, 1960.)
Mr. Wilford W. Cato, in propria persona.
Mr. Mark McElroy, attorney general, and Mr. Aubrey Wendt, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Petitioner had an adequate remedy by way of appeal from the judgment of conviction to review the alleged er rors or irregularities of which he here complains and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in habeas corpus.
Petitioner remanded to custody.
Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and Peck, JJ., concur.