Case Name: Karl MILLER, Appellant, v. Charles E. BUSH, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1986-12-24
Citations: 498 So. 2d 1065
Docket Number: No. 4-86-1696
Parties: Karl MILLER, Appellant, v. Charles E. BUSH, Appellee.
Judges: HERSEY, C.J., and ANSTEAD and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 498
Pages: 1065–1065

Head Matter:
Karl MILLER, Appellant, v. Charles E. BUSH, Appellee.
No. 4-86-1696.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Dec. 24, 1986.
Peter N. Feld of Peter N. Feld, P.A., Hollywood, for appellant.
Kayo E. Morgan of Sandstrom & Had-dad, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the order of July 21, 1986 denying the appellant's motion to dissolve or modify the injunction. We do so because it is clear on the record, and acknowledged by the trial judge, that such order was entered inadvertently and by mistake, the court not yet having conducted a hearing on the motion. We remand this cause to the trial court with directions to conduct a prompt hearing on the motion to dissolve or modify.
HERSEY, C.J., and ANSTEAD and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.