Case Name: David A. ATER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2014-06-03
Citations: 432 S.W.3d 805
Docket Number: No. ED 100112
Parties: David A. ATER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., KURT S. ODENWALD, J., and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 432
Pages: 805–805

Head Matter:
David A. ATER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 100112.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District.
June 3, 2014.
Maleaner Ryna Harvey, Missouri Public Defender Office, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., KURT S. ODENWALD, J., and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
David A. Ater (Movant) appeals from the motion court's Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Judgment on Movant's Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence denying Movant's Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).