Case Name: Jacob Yudenfreund, Appellant, v. Barbara Mortimer et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1959-12-28
Citations: 9 A.D.2d 935
Docket Number: 
Parties: Jacob Yudenfreund, Appellant, v. Barbara Mortimer et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 9
Pages: 935–935

Head Matter:
Jacob Yudenfreund, Appellant, v. Barbara Mortimer et al., Respondents.

Opinion:
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the appeal is from an order denying appellant's motion for pretrial discovery of the report of appellant's physical examination by respondents' physician. In opposition, respondents stated that appellant had served a statement of readiness prior to making the motion, and requested that it be denied unless he furnishes them with copies of his own physicians' reports and permits an X-ray specialist of respondents' choosing tq view the X rays taken by appellant's physician. The Special Term denied the motion on the ground that prior to the making thereof, appellant had filed a statement of readiness. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted on condition that appellant permit a specialist of respondents' choosing to view the X rays taken by appellant's physieiani The filing of a statement of readiness docs not liar a plaintiff's right to a copy of the report of his physical examination by defendant's doctor (Berkcn v. LeVitt, 8 A D 2d 938), nor may his right thereto be conditioned upon his furnishing defendant with a copy of the report of examination by his own physician (Boum v. Nusseñbáwh, 7 A D 2d 991; Mansoor v. Simon, 5 A D 2d 845). However, the X rays, being presumably admissible in evidence, are subject to discovery and inspection (Civ. Prac. Act, § 324; Rules Civ. Prac., rule 140; Miller v. New England Mut. Life Ins. Co., 14 N. Y. S. 2d 129). Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldock, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ,, concur; Murphy, J., deceased.