Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kareem Jamal CURRENCE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-03-27
Citations: 562 F. App'x 165
Docket Number: No. 13-7766
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kareem Jamal CURRENCE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before GREGORY, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 562
Pages: 165–165

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kareem Jamal CURRENCE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-7766.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 25, 2014.
Decided: March 27, 2014.
Kareem Jamal Currence, Appellant Pro Se. Brian R. Hood, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before GREGORY, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kareem Jamal Currence appeals the district court's order denying his self-styled Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. United States v. Currence, No. 3:05-cr-00231-JRS-l (E.D.Va. Oct. 11, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.