Case Name: M. F. Shurbet v. The State
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1933-05-03
Citations: 124 Tex. Crim. 50
Docket Number: No. 15923
Parties: M. F. Shurbet v. The State.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Criminal Reports
Volume: 124
Pages: 50–52

Head Matter:
M. F. Shurbet v. The State.
No. 15923.
Delivered May 3, 1933.
Rehearing Granted May 24, 1933.
Reported in 60 S. W. (2d) 791.
The opinion states the case.
A. B. Crane, of Raymondville, for appellant.
Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Attorney, of Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
LATTIMORE, Judge.
Conviction for aggravated assault; punishment, a fine of $25.
An inspection of the record shows that the statement of facts in this case is in question and answer form, which is forbidden by the terms of article 760, C. C. P., hence the state ment of facts cannot be considered. Choate v. State, 59 Texas Crim. Rep., 266; Huey v. State, 90 Texas Crim. Rep., 400; Johnson v. State, 91 Texas Crim. Rep., 441; King v. State, 95 Texas Crim. Rep., 93; Smith v. State, 100 Texas Crim. Rep., 234.
There are a number of bills of exception in the record, but in the absence of a statement of facts it is impossible for this court to appraise the complaints attempted to be thus brought forward.
The judgment will be affirmed.
Affirmed.