Case Name: Annett-Mahnken Realty Company, a corporation of New Jersey, respondent. v. Betsey Gollin et al., appellants
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1927-01-31
Citations: 100 N.J. Eq. 556
Docket Number: 
Parties: Annett-Mahnken Realty Company, a corporation of New Jersey, respondent. v. Betsey Gollin et al., appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 100
Pages: 556–556

Head Matter:
Annett-Mahnken Realty Company, a corporation of New Jersey, respondent. v. Betsey Gollin et al., appellants.
[Decided January 31st, 1927.]
Mr. Philip J. Scholland, for the appellants.
Mr. Charles L. Carrich, for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Our examination of the state of the ease, sent up with the present appeal, leads us to the conclusion that none of the grounds upon which we are asked to reverse the order under review have legal merit.
The order appealed from will be affirmed.
For affirmance — -The Chiee-Justice, Trenohard, Min-TURN, KALISCH, KaTZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, YAN Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.