Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Shane C. ROBERTS, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-08-21
Citations: 58 S.W.3d 625
Docket Number: No. WD 59246
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Shane C. ROBERTS, Appellant.
Judges: Before THOMAS H. NEWTON, P.J., HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, and JAMES M. SMART, JR., JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 58
Pages: 625–625

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Shane C. ROBERTS, Appellant.
No. WD 59246.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Submitted July 3, 2001.
Decided Aug. 21, 2001.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 2, 2001.
Application for Transfer Denied Nov. 20, 2001.
Kent Denzel, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before THOMAS H. NEWTON, P.J., HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, and JAMES M. SMART, JR., JJ.

Opinion:
Order
PER CURIAM:
Shane Roberts appeals his conviction of the class B felony of committing violence against an employee of the Department of Corrections, § 217.385, RSMo 1994. He contends that the trial court erred when it failed to intervene in the prosecution's closing argument when the prosecution was arguing facts outside the record.
Having carefully considered the point on appeal, the court concludes that the appeal is without merit. A formal opinion would lack jurisprudential value. A memorandum has been furnished to the parties as to the basis of the decision.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).