Case Name: Tamera L. ETHERIDGE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF ROANOKE RAPIDS; Joseph Scherer, in his Official Capacity as City Manager; John Simeon, in his Official and Individual Capacity as Director, Parks and Recreations; Christina Coker, in her Official and Individual Capacity as Aquatics Supervisor, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-03-06
Citations: 678 F. App'x 168
Docket Number: No. 16-1764
Parties: Tamera L. ETHERIDGE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF ROANOKE RAPIDS; Joseph Scherer, in his Official Capacity as City Manager; John Simeon, in his Official and Individual Capacity as Director, Parks and Recreations; Christina Coker, in her Official and Individual Capacity as Aquatics Supervisor, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 678
Pages: 168–169

Head Matter:
Tamera L. ETHERIDGE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF ROANOKE RAPIDS; Joseph Scherer, in his Official Capacity as City Manager; John Simeon, in his Official and Individual Capacity as Director, Parks and Recreations; Christina Coker, in her Official and Individual Capacity as Aquatics Supervisor, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-1764
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: February 28, 2017
Decided: March 6, 2017
Anthony James Cuticchia, Jr., AJC LEGAL SERVICES, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Torin L. Fury, William L. Hill, FRAZIER HILL & FURY, RLLP, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Tamera L. Etheridge appeals the district court's order dismissing her complaint for insufficient process, insufficient service of process, and lack of personal jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Etheridge v. City of Roanoke Rapids, No. 4:15-cv-00089-BO, 2016 WL 3080788 (E.D.N.C. filed May 27, 2016 & entered May 31, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED