Case Name: David PICRAY, Respondent on Review, v. SECRETARY OF STATE, Petitioner on Review
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1997-04-29
Citations: 325 Or. 279
Docket Number: CA A85293; SC S43537
Parties: David PICRAY, Respondent on Review, v. SECRETARY OF STATE, Petitioner on Review.
Judges: Before Carson, Chief Justice, and Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Fadeley, Graber, and Durham, Justices.
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 325
Pages: 279–279

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted January 17,
decision of the Court of Appeals affirmed by an equally divided court; order of the Secretary of State reversed April 29, 1997
David PICRAY, Respondent on Review, v. SECRETARY OF STATE, Petitioner on Review.
(CA A85293; SC S43537)
936 P2d 974
Rives Kistler, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on the petition were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.
David C. Force, Eugene, argued the cause and filed a response for respondent on review.
Before Carson, Chief Justice, and Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Fadeley, Graber, and Durham, Justices.
Kulongoski, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed by an equally divided court. The order of the Secretary of State is reversed.