Case Name: Curtis WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2009-04-21
Citations: 283 S.W.3d 825
Docket Number: No. ED 91051
Parties: Curtis WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before KURT S. ODENWALD, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J. and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 283
Pages: 825–825

Head Matter:
Curtis WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 91051.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
April 21, 2009.
Application for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied June 2, 2009.
Scott Rosenblum, Brocea Smith, Clayton, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Foster, Attorney General, John Winston Grantham, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before KURT S. ODENWALD, P.J., GLENN A. NORTON, J. and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Curtis Williams appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).