Case Name: Kyle D. GARDNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-12-29
Citations: 983 S.W.2d 206
Docket Number: No. 74683
Parties: Kyle D. GARDNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before HOFF, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 983
Pages: 206–206

Head Matter:
Kyle D. GARDNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 74683.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Dec. 29, 1998.
Emmett D. Queener, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before HOFF, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Kyle D. Gardner ("movant"), appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Cape Girardeau County denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. In his prior appeal, State v. Gardner, 952 S.W.2d 384 (Mo.App.E.D. 1997), we remanded movant's Rule 29.15 motion to the motion court for entry of specific findings of fact and conclusions of law. Movant now asks us to review those specific findings and conclusions. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision is attached solely for the use of the parties involved.