Case Name: JACKSON v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1913-04-30
Citations: 156 S.W. 1183
Docket Number: 
Parties: JACKSON v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 156
Pages: 1183–1185

Head Matter:
JACKSON v. STATE.
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
April 30, 1913.
On Motion for Rehearing, May 28, 1913.)
1. Criminal Law (§ 1097 ) — !Necessity or Statement of Facts — Instructions.
Assignments of error as to charges on the issue of aggravated assault and the insufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction cannot be considered, in the absence of a statement of facts.
[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal' Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2862, 2864,. 2926, 2934, 2938, 2939, 2941, 2942, 2947; Dec. Dig. § 1097. ]
On Motion for Rehearing.
2. Criminal Law (§ 1077 ) — Transcript of Evidence — Inability to Pay — Duty of Court to Order.
Act 32d Leg. p. 268, § 14, providing that in all cases where the court is required to and does appoint an attorney to represent the defendant in criminal action the official reporter shall be required to furnish the attorney for said defendant, if convicted, and where an appeal is prosecuted, with a transcript of his notes, as provided in section 5, for which service the state of Texas shall pay, etc., when construed with section 8, does not authorize the furnishing of a transcript of the evidence to an accused who was represented by employed counsel.
[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2718, 2719; Dec. Dig. § 1077. ]'
3. Criminal Law (§ 1186 ) — Transcript of Evidence — Furnishing on Inability to Pay.
Where, on accused’s affidavit of inability to pay, the court rightfully refused a free transcript, because he was represented by employed counsel, and there was no attempt to make up a statement of facts from memory of the evidence, and no attempt to show why a statement of facts was not made up by counsel, nor any showing that they were unable to do so, it cannot be held that accused was deprived of a statement of facts through no fault on his part.
[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 3215-3219, 3221, 3230; Dec. Dig. § 1186. ]
Appeal from District Court, Jasper County; W. B. Powell, Judge.
Charley Jackson was convicted of assault with intent to murder, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
Blake & Williams and J. J. Lee, all of Jasper, for appellant. C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
For otner cases see same topic and section NUMBER in Dec. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key-No. Series & Rep’r Indexes
For other oases see same topic and section NUMBER in Dec. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key-No. Series & Rep’r Indexes

Opinion:
DAVIDSON, P. J.
Appellant was convicted of assault with intent to murder; his punishment being assessed at three years' confinement in the penitentiary.
The contentions of appellant in the motion for new trial, as well as his assignments of error, are all based upon the failure of the court to charge the issue of aggravated assault, and the insufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction. These .matters cannot be considered, in the absence of the statement of facts. Appellant has filed a brief, in which it is contended the evidence suggested the issues he assigns as error, and refers to the evidence in support of his contention. In the absence of the evidence, this court is not in position to review the questions presented.
The judgment therefore will be affirmed.