Case Name: BROOKS CLOTHING OF CALIFORNIA, Limited, Defendant-Appellant, v. BROOKS BROTHERS, Plaintiff-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1947-01-09
Citations: 158 F.2d 798
Docket Number: No. 11158
Parties: BROOKS CLOTHING OF CALIFORNIA, Limited, Defendant-Appellant, v. BROOKS BROTHERS, Plaintiff-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 158
Pages: 798–798

Head Matter:
BROOKS CLOTHING OF CALIFORNIA, Limited, Defendant-Appellant, v. BROOKS BROTHERS, Plaintiff-Appellee.
No. 11158.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan. 9, 1947.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 10,1947.
See also D.C., 5 F.R.D. 14.
Pacht, Pelton, Warne, Ross & Bernhard, of Los Angeles, Cal. (Isaac Pacht, Clore Warne, and Bernard Reich, all of Los An-geles, Cal., and Harry D. Nims, Minturn de S. Verdi, and Wm. Mitchell Van Winkle, Jr., all of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Beekman Aitken, of New York City (Felix T. Smith, Eugene Prince, and Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, all of San Francisco, Cal., of counsel), for appellee.
Before GARRECHT, MATHEWS, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The opinion of District Judge Leon R. Yankwich (60 F.Supp. 442) correctly sets forth the salient facts, analyzes the issues, and applies the law. We adopt that opinion as our own. The judgment is affirmed.