Case Name: Jay CRESWELL and Alice Creswell, his wife, Appellants, v. WEST CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Inc., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1957-09-18
Citations: 97 So. 2d 47
Docket Number: No. 10
Parties: Jay CRESWELL and Alice Creswell, his wife, Appellants, v. WEST CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Inc., Appellee.
Judges: KANNER, C. J., and PLEUS and ALLEN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 97
Pages: 47–47

Head Matter:
Jay CRESWELL and Alice Creswell, his wife, Appellants, v. WEST CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Inc., Appellee.
No. 10.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.
Sept. 18, 1957.
Rehearing Denied Oct. 8, 1957.
Frank A. Taylor, Orlando, for appellants.
Charles E. Davis (of Fishback, Williams, Davis & Dominick), Orlando, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have examined the record and the briefs of counsel in this cause and heard oral argument at the bar of this court. It is apparent to the court upon perusal of the record that the general master to whom the case had been referred, based his findings upon conflicting evidence. An experienced chancellor reviewed the record and found that the master's conclusions and recommendations were substantially supported in the record, and which were adopted by the court and made a part of the final decree by reference. We follow the rule that the decision of the court below, based upo'n conflicting evidence, will not be disturbed unless clearly shown to be erroneous. See Peterson v. Hancock, 1941, 146 Fla. 410, 1 So.2d 255; Loew v. Friedman, Fla.1955, 80 So.2d,672.
We find no reversible error in the record and therefore conclude that the case should be, and it is hereby, affirmed.
KANNER, C. J., and PLEUS and ALLEN, JJ., concur.