Case Name: Stanley FELSEN, Appellant, v. Loretta C. FELSEN, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1994-01-12
Citations: 629 So. 2d 1083
Docket Number: No. 93-1613
Parties: Stanley FELSEN, Appellant, v. Loretta C. FELSEN, Appellee.
Judges: SMITH, BARFIELD and MICKLE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 629
Pages: 1083–1083

Head Matter:
Stanley FELSEN, Appellant, v. Loretta C. FELSEN, Appellee.
No. 93-1613.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jan. 12, 1994.
Allison E. Folds of Watson, Folds, Stead-ham, Christmann, Brashear, Tovkach & Walker, Gainesville, for appellant.
Margaret Blowers Anderson, Gainesville, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Upon review of the briefs, and the record presented, we have determined that disposition of this appeal is governed by Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979), in which the court held that in appellate proceedings, the decision of the trial court has the presumption of correctness, and the burden is on the appellant to demonstrate error; the lack of a trial transcript or a proper substitute precludes appellate review of the underlying factual issues so as to preclude the conclusion that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence, or upon some alternative theory.
AFFIRMED.
SMITH, BARFIELD and MICKLE, JJ., concur.