Case Name: SKIPPY INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LIPTON INVESTMENTS, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-09-12
Citations: 74 F. App'x 291
Docket Number: No. 03-1086
Parties: SKIPPY INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LIPTON INVESTMENTS, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 74
Pages: 291–292

Head Matter:
SKIPPY INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LIPTON INVESTMENTS, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 03-1086.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 29, 2003.
Decided Sept. 12, 2003.
Mary Helen Sears, M.H. Sears Law Firm, Washington, DC, for Appellant. William M. Webner, Sughrue Mion, P.L.L.C., Washington, DC, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, WIDENER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Skippy Incorporated appeals the district court's order dismissing its complaint, among other reasons, for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). We have thoroughly reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Skippy Inc. v. Lipton Investments, Inc., No. CA-02-1227-A (E.D.Va. Dec. 20, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.