Case Name: Jefferson MORLEY, Appellant v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-02-20
Citations: 599 F. App'x 1
Docket Number: No. 14-5230
Parties: Jefferson MORLEY, Appellant v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, Appellee.
Judges: BEFORE: HENDERSON, SRINIVASAN, and PILLARD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 599
Pages: 1–2

Head Matter:
Jefferson MORLEY, Appellant v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, Appellee.
No. 14-5230.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Feb. 20, 2015.
James H. Lesar, I, Law Office of James Lesar, Silver Spring, MD, Appellant.
Benton Gregory Peterson, Esquire, R. Craig Lawrence, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Washington, DC, for Appellee.
BEFORE: HENDERSON, SRINIVASAN, and PILLARD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the motion for summary affirmance, the opposition thereto, and the reply, it is
ORDERED that the motion for summary affirmance be denied. The merits of the parties' positions are not so clear as to warrant summary action. See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C.Cir.1987) (per curiam).
Because the court has determined that summary disposition is not in order, the Clerk is instructed to calendar this case for presentation to a merits panel.