Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. JACK PAUL VAN GORDER, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1991-07-31
Citations: 108 Or. App. 333
Docket Number: 90-CR-0015-ST; CA A66849
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. JACK PAUL VAN GORDER, Appellant.
Judges: Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, Joseph, Chief Judge, and Deits, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 108
Pages: 333–334

Head Matter:
Submitted on record and briefs June 26,
convictions affirmed; condition of probation requiring incarceration vacated; remanded for resentencing July 31, 1991
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. JACK PAUL VAN GORDER, Appellant.
(90-CR-0015-ST; CA A66849)
813 P2d 1136
David E. Groom, Portland, filed the brief for appellant.
Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Janet A. Klapstein, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, Joseph, Chief Judge, and Deits, Judge.
PER CURIAM
Joseph, C. J., vice Newman, J.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant was convicted, after his plea of guilty, of two misdemeanors. The court placed him on probation and, as one condition, sentenced him to incarceration in the county jail. Defendant contends that, because the offenses were committed after November 1,1989, the effective date of the amendment to ORS 137.540(2), the court had no authority to impose a jail sentence as a condition of probation on a misdemeanor conviction. The state concedes that defendant is correct, and we agree. State v. Wold, 105 Or App 158, 803 P2d 782 (1991).
Convictions affirmed; condition of probation requiring incarceration vacated; remanded for resentencing.