Case Name: Tanya CROSS, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Gary CROSS, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-08-28
Citations: 374 S.W.3d 401
Docket Number: No. ED 97115
Parties: Tanya CROSS, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Gary CROSS, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 374
Pages: 401–401

Head Matter:
Tanya CROSS, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Gary CROSS, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 97115.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Aug. 28, 2012.
Tanya Lang Feldman, Old Monroe, MO, Pro Se, For Plaintiff/Respondent.
Gary Cross, Cameron, MO, Pro Se, For Defendant/Appellant.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Gary Cross (Husband) appeals from the trial court's dismissal of his Motion for Contempt alleging his former spouse, Tanya Cross, failed to comply with the terms of their dissolution decree. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Husband's motion. Jones v. Jones, 296 S.W.3d 526, 527-28 (Mo.App. W.D.2009). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).