Case Name: TATUM v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1929-11-06
Citations: 21 S.W.2d 513
Docket Number: No. 12691
Parties: TATUM v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 21
Pages: 513–514

Head Matter:
TATUM v. STATE.
(No. 12691.)
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Nov. 6, 1929.
Wm. Kennedy, of Groesbeek, for appellant.
A. A. Dawson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
HAWKINS, J.
Conviction ⅛ for burglary; punishment being two years in the penitentiary.
No complaint is made of the court's instruction to the jury, and no bills of exception to any proceeding during the trial is brought forward.
We find in the record what purports to be a statement of facts, but it is not signed by the attorneys, nor approved by the trial judge. However, we had examined it before discovering tile defects mentioned. If it reflects tlie facts, they are amply sufficient to support the verdict. The record must be treated as being without either statement of facts or bills of exception.
The judgment is affirmed.