Case Name: Daniel M. PRESCOTT, Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-08-01
Citations: 903 S.W.2d 294
Docket Number: No. 66634
Parties: Daniel M. PRESCOTT, Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent.
Judges: Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 903
Pages: 294–295

Head Matter:
Daniel M. PRESCOTT, Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent.
No. 66634.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Aug. 1, 1995.
Gerald M. Dunne, Clayton, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Rodney P. Massman, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Mo. Dept, of Revenue, Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Driver appeals from the judgment of the trial court following a trial de novo revoking his license for driving while intoxicated. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order, We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).