Case Name: SATURDAY MORNING MUSICAL CLUB (a Corporation), Appellant, v. MAX VIAULT, Respondent
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1931-02-04
Citations: 111 Cal. App. 562
Docket Number: Civ. No. 6361
Parties: SATURDAY MORNING MUSICAL CLUB (a Corporation), Appellant, v. MAX VIAULT, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports
Volume: 111
Pages: 562–564

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 6361.
Second Appellate District, Division One.
February 4, 1931.]
SATURDAY MORNING MUSICAL CLUB (a Corporation), Appellant, v. MAX VIAULT, Respondent.
Kingan & Darnell, Young & Young, Milton K. Young and Wm. K. Young for Appellant.
Stick, Moerdyke, Gibson & Untereiner for Respondent.

Opinion:
YORK, J.
The plaintiff brought action for judgment on the following subscription agreement:
"Tucson, Arizona, July 12, 1922.
"I agree to pay one thousand Dollars for 200 shares of the stock in the Saturday Morning Musical Club Building Fund at $5.00 per share, to be paid when building is- started. First payment $----, the balance to be paid before January 1, 1923.
"Address:
"236 South Scott. Max Viault."
General and special demurrers to the complaint and amended complaint were sustained, and upon motion for judgment on the pleadings made by defendant, the action was dismissed by the court. Plaintiff prosecutes this appeal from such judgment of dismissal.
Defendant's agreement is for stock in the Saturday Morning Musical Club building fund and not for stock of the Saturday Morning Musical Club, á corporation, the entity seeking to enforce the agreement. Without any pleading alleging the assignment of the interest of the said building fund to the Saturday Morning Musical Club, a corporation, we are of the opinion that the demurrers were properly sustained and said cause properly dismissed. There is no allegation in the pleadings showing whether or not the said building fund was ever incorporated. It may have been incorporated and merged with the plaintiff, but there is no such allegation.
The judgment of dismissal is affirmed.