Case Name: Louis Maira, Respondent, v. Esther Friedman, Appellant, and Charles W. Hartung et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Others
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1919-06-06
Citations: 226 N.Y. 706
Docket Number: 
Parties: Louis Maira, Respondent, v. Esther Friedman, Appellant, and Charles W. Hartung et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Others.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 226
Pages: 706–707

Head Matter:
Louis Maira, Respondent, v. Esther Friedman, Appellant, and Charles W. Hartung et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Others.
Maira v. Friedman, 171 App. Div. 887, affirmed.
(Submitted May 22, 1919;
decided June 6, 1919.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered November 20, 1915, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, and defendants-respondents, entered upon a decision of the Monroe County Court on trial without a jury in an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. The defendant, appellant, contended that plaintiff wrong fully abandoned and failed to complete the work he had contracted to perform.
William MacFarlane for appellant.
George E. Warner for plaintiff-respondent.
Eugene Baines for defendants-respondents.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed, with costs to each set of respondents appearing by separate attorney; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Collin, Cuddeback, Cardozo, Pound, Crane and Andrews, JJ.