Case Name: Michaelene HART, Appellant, v. ORACLE CORPORATION, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-05-04
Citations: 6 F. App'x 543
Docket Number: No. 00-1446
Parties: Michaelene HART, Appellant, v. ORACLE CORPORATION, Appellee.
Judges: Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 6
Pages: 543–544

Head Matter:
Michaelene HART, Appellant, v. ORACLE CORPORATION, Appellee.
No. 00-1446.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted May 1, 2001.
Filed May 4, 2001.
Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Michaelene Hart appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment in Hart's employment discrimination action, and Oracle Corporation moves to dismiss the appeal. We deny Oracle Corporation's motion to dismiss, and having reviewed the parties' submissions and the record, see LaCroix v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 240 F.3d 688, 690 (8th Cir.2001) (standard of review), we agree with the district court that Hart failed to show Oracle Corporation's proffered reason for terminating her was pretextual, see Cronquist v. City of Minneapolis, 237 F.3d 920, 924 (8th Cir.2001) (burden-shifting analysis). We thus affirm the judgment entered by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.