Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Rolando Javier CONTRERAS-GONZALEZ, also known as Homero Medina-Gonzalez, also known as Homero Medina, also known as Rolando Javier Contreras Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-12-17
Citations: 501 F. App'x 334
Docket Number: No. 12-20298
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Rolando Javier CONTRERAS-GONZALEZ, also known as Homero Medina-Gonzalez, also known as Homero Medina, also known as Rolando Javier Contreras Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before DAVIS, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 501
Pages: 334–335

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Rolando Javier CONTRERAS-GONZALEZ, also known as Homero Medina-Gonzalez, also known as Homero Medina, also known as Rolando Javier Contreras Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-20298
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 17, 2012.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Molly Estelle Odom, Esq., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Rolando Javier Contreras-Gonzalez, Jonesville, VA, pro se.
Before DAVIS, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rolando Javier Contreras- Gonzalez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Contreras-Gonzalez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.