Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William M. BRYSON, Jr., Defendant-Appellant; United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William M. Bryson, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-12-21
Citations: 625 F. App'x 222
Docket Number: Nos. 15-6759, 15-6762
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William M. BRYSON, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William M. Bryson, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 625
Pages: 222–223

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William M. BRYSON, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William M. Bryson, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 15-6759, 15-6762.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 17, 2015.
Decided: Dec. 21, 2015.
William M. Bryson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
William M. Bryson, Jr., appeals the district court's orders denying his motions for modification of the terms of his supervised release. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion and no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's orders. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(2) (2012), We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are' adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process..
AFFIRMED.