Case Name: Ramon PRECIADO-JIMENEZ; Maria Delia Preciado, Petitioners, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-07-07
Citations: 285 F. App'x 365
Docket Number: No. 05-77407
Parties: Ramon PRECIADO-JIMENEZ; Maria Delia Preciado, Petitioners, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 285
Pages: 365–366

Head Matter:
Ramon PRECIADO-JIMENEZ; Maria Delia Preciado, Petitioners, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 05-77407.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 18, 2008.
Filed July 7, 2008.
Ramon Preciado-Jimenez, pro se.
Maria Delia Preciado, pro se.
CAC-District Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Daniel G. Longeran, OIL, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Ramon Preciado-Jimenez and Maria Delia Preciado, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order denying their second motion to reopen.
On June 13, 2006, the BIA sua sponte reconsidered the order under review after petitioners filed their opening brief in this court. The government acknowledges that it is likely petitioners did not receive the June 13, 2006 BIA order in time to petition for review of that order, due to a change of address. We therefore grant the government's request to remand the case for the BIA to consider whether to exercise its authority to reissue its June 13, 2006 order.
PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.