Case Name: RANDOLPH H. TRULL v. CENTRAL CAROLINA BANK & TRUST; RICHARD H. CRONK, JR.; PLAYER I, a North Carolina General Partnership and KITTY PLAYER BECK
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 1997-10-03
Citations: 347 N.C. 262
Docket Number: No. 524A96
Parties: RANDOLPH H. TRULL v. CENTRAL CAROLINA BANK & TRUST; RICHARD H. CRONK, JR.; PLAYER I, a North Carolina General Partnership and KITTY PLAYER BECK
Judges: 
Reporter: North Carolina Reports
Volume: 347
Pages: 262–262

Head Matter:
RANDOLPH H. TRULL v. CENTRAL CAROLINA BANK & TRUST; RICHARD H. CRONK, JR.; PLAYER I, a North Carolina General Partnership and KITTY PLAYER BECK
No. 524A96
(Filed 3 October 1997)
Appeal by plaintiff pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 124 N.C. App. 486, 478 S.E.2d 39 (1996), affirming an order entered by Cashwell, J., on 31 July 1995 in Superior Court, Wake County. On 6 March 1997 this Court allowed plaintiffs petition for discretionary review as to an additional issue. Heard in the Supreme Court 9 September 1997.
Bums, Day & Presnell, P.A., by Lacy M. Presnell III and Susan F. Vick, for plaintiff-appellant.
H. Spencer Barrow and George B. Currin for defendantappellee Central Carolina Bank & Trust.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated in the majority opinion by Judge Eagles. We hold that plaintiffs petition for discretionary review as to an additional issue was improvidently allowed.
AFFIRMED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED IN PART.