Case Name: FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. The Honorable Judge BARRETT, Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1983-11-22
Citations: 441 So. 2d 179
Docket Number: No. 83-2467
Parties: FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. The Honorable Judge BARRETT, Respondent.
Judges: DOWNEY, BERANEK and HURLEY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 441
Pages: 179–180

Head Matter:
FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. The Honorable Judge BARRETT, Respondent.
No. 83-2467.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Nov. 22, 1983.
Edward R. Curtis of Fertig & Curtis, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.
David L. Crow of Paxton, Crow, Bragg & Austin, P.A., West Palm Beach, for defendant-Florida Power and Light Co.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner seeks a Writ of Mandamus directed to Respondent trial judge to require the trial court to give the parties adequate notice of the trial date as required by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1440(c).
We "requested" responses from any and all parties. Having received a response only from the defendant in the trial court which agreed with petitioner that the notice was inadequate and prejudiced the parties, we grant the Writ of Mandamus and direct the trial court to furnish notice of trial to the parties in accordance with the referenced rule.
DOWNEY, BERANEK and HURLEY, JJ., concur.