Case Name: In the Matter of the Claim of Walter Holderer, Respondent, against The Brooklyn City Railroad Company, Appellant. The State Industrial Board, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1929-03-19
Citations: 250 N.Y. 561
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Claim of Walter Holderer, Respondent, against The Brooklyn City Railroad Company, Appellant. The State Industrial Board, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 250
Pages: 561–562

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Claim of Walter Holderer, Respondent, against The Brooklyn City Railroad Company, Appellant. The State Industrial Board, Respondent.
(Argued February 11, 1929;
decided March 19, 1929.)
Albert A. Kraus, W. Harry Sefton and George D. Yeomans for appellant.
Hamilton Ward, Attorney-General (E. C. Aiken of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
Order affirmed, with costs. Held, that the employer did not have notice of the accident within thirty days after the happening thereof but that the evidence sustains the finding that it was not prejudiced by the failure to serve written notice of injury within the statutory period.
Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O'Brien and Hubbs, JJ.