Case Name: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Boykin
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1998-06-10
Citations: 82 Ohio St. 3d 100
Docket Number: No. 97-2725
Parties: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Boykin.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 82
Pages: 100–102

Head Matter:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Boykin.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Boykin (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 100.]
(No. 97-2725
Submitted March 4, 1998
Decided June 10, 1998.)
Jonathan E. Coughlan, Disciplinary Counsel, and Sally Ann Steuk, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. We also note that in August 1994, we suspended respondent for eighteen months, but stayed the suspension on the condition, among others, that he spend the entire time on probation under the guidance of a monitor. Disciplinary Counsel v. Boykin (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 75, 637 N.E.2d 296.
Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.