Case Name: Melba L. HUTTON, Appellant, v. Allen G. KING, et al, Defendant, and Dale Shipley and Shipley & Kjar, LLC, Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-08-01
Citations: 197 S.W.3d 236
Docket Number: No. WD 66147
Parties: Melba L. HUTTON, Appellant, v. Allen G. KING, et al, Defendant, and Dale Shipley and Shipley & Kjar, LLC, Respondents.
Judges: Before JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Presiding Judge, ROBERT G. ULRICH, Judge, and RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 197
Pages: 236–236

Head Matter:
Melba L. HUTTON, Appellant, v. Allen G. KING, et al, Defendant, and Dale Shipley and Shipley & Kjar, LLC, Respondents.
No. WD 66147.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Aug. 1, 2006.
Thomas E. Hankins, Gladstone, for Appellant.
James Christian Morrow, Marth Ann Halvordson, Kansas City, for Respondent.
Before JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Presiding Judge, ROBERT G. ULRICH, Judge, and RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
Melba Hutton appeals the jury verdict in favor of defendants Dale Shipley and Shipley & Kjar, L.L.C., in her malpractice action against Mr. Shipley and his law firm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record, and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no prece-dential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).