Case Name: GLEN TYLER et al., Appellants, v. CITY COUNCIL OF HUNTINGTON PARK et al., Respondents
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1929-03-22
Citations: 97 Cal. App. 724
Docket Number: Civ. No. 6326
Parties: GLEN TYLER et al., Appellants, v. CITY COUNCIL OF HUNTINGTON PARK et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports
Volume: 97
Pages: 724–725

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 6326.
Second Appellate District, Division Two.
March 22, 1929.]
GLEN TYLER et al., Appellants, v. CITY COUNCIL OF HUNTINGTON PARK et al., Respondents.
S. A. Shoop and H. W. Hess for Appellants.
Carson B. Hubbard for Respondents.

Opinion:
STEPHENS, J., pro tem.
Appellants petitioned the superior court for a writ of review as to certain actions of the City Council of the City of Huntington Park. A demurrer to the petition was interposed and the court sustained it without leave to amend. Defendants also filed a motion to dismiss the proceeding and the court granted the motion and ordered the cause dismissed. This attempted appeal is from the ruling of the court on the demurrer alone, and it must be dismissed, as an order on demurrer is not appealable. (Sec. 963, Code Civ. Proc.) Even if this were not true, nothing could he gained by our consideration of the appeal, for the order of dismissal would remain in full force and effect.
The appeal is dismissed.
Works, P. J., and Craig, J., concurred.