Case Name: Business Aviation, Inc., Appellant, v. Vac Air Alloys Corporation, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1985-11-15
Citations: 115 A.D.2d 278
Docket Number: 
Parties: Business Aviation, Inc., Appellant, v Vac Air Alloys Corporation, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 115
Pages: 278–279

Head Matter:
Business Aviation, Inc., Appellant, v Vac Air Alloys Corporation, Respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: When viewed in the light most favorable to the defendant (see, Matter of Kornblum Metals Co. v Intsel Corp., 38 NY2d 376), there is ample evidence from which the jury could have concluded that all statements pertaining to the description of the plane had been merged in the written agreement and that the agreement contained no express warranty that the engines would be 3000 TBO. Thus, there was no breach of contract. We have considered plaintiff's remaining contentions and find them lacking in merit. (Ap peal from judgment of Supreme Court, Chautauqua County, Ricotta, J.—breach of contract and warranty.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Hancock, Jr., Doerr, Green and Schnepp, JJ.