Case Name: The STATE, Respondent v. Roy F. HUNTER, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jurisdiction: South Carolina
Decision Date: 1989-12-04
Citations: 300 S.C. 83
Docket Number: 23106
Parties: The STATE, Respondent v. Roy F. HUNTER, Appellant.
Judges: Gregory, C. J., and Harwell, Finney and Toal, JJ., concur.
Reporter: South Carolina Reports
Volume: 300
Pages: 83–84

Head Matter:
23106
The STATE, Respondent v. Roy F. HUNTER, Appellant.
(386 S. E. (2d) 460)
Supreme Court
Mitchell K. Byrd, Rock Hill, and S. C. Office of Appellate Defense, Columbia, for appellant.
Atty. Gen. T. Travis Medlock, Asst. Attys. Gen. Harold M. Coombs, Jr., and Amie L. Clifford, Columbia, and Sol. William L. Ferguson, York, for respondent.
Heard Nov. 1, 1989.
Decided Dec. 4, 1989.

Opinion:
Chandler, Justice:
Appellant Roy F. Hunter (Hunter) contends the State failed to produce certain evidence required by Brady v. Maryland. We agree.
Prior to the call of the case, Hunter filed a Brady motion. During trial, it was revealed that the State had not disclosed all information to which he was entitled. The State's failure to comply with Brady mandates reversal and a new trial.
Reversed and remanded.
Gregory, C. J., and Harwell, Finney and Toal, JJ., concur.
373 U. S. 83, 83 S. Ct., 1194, 10 L. Ed (2d) 215 (1963).