Case Name: John Hinton v. The State
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1923-04-25
Citations: 95 Tex. Crim. 3
Docket Number: No. 7674
Parties: John Hinton v. The State.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Criminal Reports
Volume: 95
Pages: 3–4

Head Matter:
John Hinton v. The State.
No. 7674.
Decided April 25, 1923.
Rehearing Denied June 20, 1923.
1. —Receiving and Concealing Stolen Property — Statement oí Facts.
Where, upon appeal from a conviction of receiving and concealing" stolen property, the record was without a statement of facts, the indictment-being regular, the judgment below is affirmed.
2. —Same—Rehearing—Agreement Between Counsel.
An agrément between the attorneys for the appellant and a counsel representing the State that the statement of facts might be filed back as within the time granted by statutes for such filing, cannot be recognized by this court, as the law requires that the statement of facts and bills of exceptions must be filed within a certain time.
Appeal from the District Court of Wichita. Tried below before the Honorable P. A. Martin.
Appeal from a conviction of receiving and concealing stolen property; penalty, five years imprisonment in the penitentiary.
The opinion states the ease.
H. R. Bishop, for appellant.
R. G. Storey, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Opinion:
LATTIMORE, Judge.
— Appellant was convicted in the District Court Wichita County of receiving and concealing stolen property, and his punishment fixed at five years in the penitentiary.
The record is before us without a statement of facts. The bills of exception relate to such matters as depend for their soundness upon the facts. Having no facts before us we can not conclude same show any error. The indictment and charge of the court being regular, an affirmance will be ordered.
Affirmed.