Case Name: Jorge SANCHEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-08-23
Citations: 763 So. 2d 1279
Docket Number: No. 3D00-1456
Parties: Jorge SANCHEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before JORGENSON, COPE and RAMIREZ, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 763
Pages: 1279–1280

Head Matter:
Jorge SANCHEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D00-1456.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Aug. 23, 2000.
Jorge Sanchez, in proper person.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Roberta G. Mandel, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before JORGENSON, COPE and RAMIREZ, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Jorge Sanchez appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. His sworn motion contends that he was not advised of the immigration consequences of his plea. The State concedes that the sworn allegations are legally sufficient under Peart v. State, 756 So.2d 42, 48 (Fla.2000), and that he is entitled to an eviden- tiary hearing unless' the record conclusively shows that the movant is entitled to no relief. We reverse the order now under review and remand for the trial court either to attach portions of the record demonstrating conclusively that the defendant is not entitled to relief, or alternatively, to conduct an evidentiary hearing on the defendant's motion. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(d). The State notes that the transcript of the plea colloquy is not readily available in the record and will need to be ordered.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.