Case Name: In the Matter of the Claim of Henry G. Zaro, Respondent, against Zaro Tourist and Steamship Ticket Agency, Inc., and Another, Appellants. tate Industrial Board, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1927-11
Citations: 222 A.D. 700
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Claim of Henry G. Zaro, Respondent, against Zaro Tourist and Steamship Ticket Agency, Inc., and Another, Appellants. tate Industrial Board, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 222
Pages: 700–700

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Claim of Henry G. Zaro, Respondent, against Zaro Tourist and Steamship Ticket Agency, Inc., and Another, Appellants. tate Industrial Board, Respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The carrier having been given an opportunity on the argument to procure if possible representation by the employer on this- appeal and having been unable to do so the appeal must be dismissed. (See Matter of Hammele v. McMahon, 220 App. Div. 60.) Cochrane, P. J., Van Kirk, Hinman, McCann and Whitmyer, JJ., concur. Appeal dismissed, with ten dollars costs against the insurance carrier to the State Industrial Board.