Case Name: Towne Buick-Opel, Inc., Respondent, v. London Motors Corporation, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1986-01-24
Citations: 116 A.D.2d 1000
Docket Number: 
Parties: Towne Buick-Opel, Inc., Respondent, v London Motors Corporation, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 116
Pages: 1000–1001

Head Matter:
Towne Buick-Opel, Inc., Respondent, v London Motors Corporation, Appellant.

Opinion:
— Order unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: There are ambiguities in the terminology used in the conditional sales contract. Since a determination of the intent of the parties depends upon the credibility of extrinsic evidence, or on a choice among reasonable inferences to be drawn from extrinsic evidence, there are triable issues of fact raised which preclude granting summary judgment (Hartford Acc. & Indent. Co. v Wesolowski, 33 NY2d 169, 172; Mallad Constr. Corp. v County Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn., 32 NY2d 285, 291). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, McGowan, J. — summary judgment.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Green, O'Donnell and Pine, JJ.