Case Name: JOHNSON et al. v. HENSHAW
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1921-02-01
Citations: 80 Okla. 100
Docket Number: No. 9890
Parties: JOHNSON et al. v. HENSHAW.
Judges: 
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 80
Pages: 100–101

Head Matter:
JOHNSON et al. v. HENSHAW.
No. 9890
Opinion Filed Feb. 1, 1921.
Action by Wiillie Henshaw, a minor, by Pleas Henshaw, her legal guardian, against A. O. Johnson and another. Judgment for •plaintiff was affirmed (80 Okla. 58, 193 Pac. 998), and plaintiff, moves for judgment against sureties on supersedeas bond.
Judgment entered.
Olaude A. Niles, for plaintiffs in error.
•J. B. Lucas and Britton OS. Tabor, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
HARRISON, C. J.
On December 14, 1920, an opinion was rendered by this court in the above case in favor of the defendant in error (80 Okla. 58, 193 Pac. 998), bu tit did not expressly give judgment against sureties on supersedeas bond. Motion is now made by defendant in error for judgment against such sureties. Under chapter 249, Session Laws 1915, p. 606, as construed by this court in Long v. O. R. Lang & Co., 49 Okla. 342, 152 Pac. 1078, Wilcox v. Wooten, 60 Okla. 204, 159 Pac. 1118, and Rumley v. Sanders et al., 62 Okla. 284, 162 Pac. 949, judgment should have been rendered against the sureties on the supersedeas bond.
Judgment is therefore entered in this court in favor of defendant in error, Willie Hen-shaw, nee McIntosh, a minor, by Pleas Hen-shaw, her legal guardian, against C. J. Nunn and H. L. Wood, sureties on supersedeas bond herein for the sum of $850, with interest at the rate of 6 per cent, per annum from October 19, 1917, and for costs.