Case Name: Brandon WATSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF ABERDEEN; Aberdeen Police Department; PFC. Raul Fosmark; Detective John Divel; CPL. Craig Gentile; Harry Fredrick Budnick; Officer Thaddeus Tomlinson, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-11-29
Citations: 671 F. App'x 79
Docket Number: No. 16-1573
Parties: Brandon WATSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF ABERDEEN; Aberdeen Police Department; PFC. Raul Fosmark; Detective John Divel; CPL. Craig Gentile; Harry Fredrick Budnick; Officer Thaddeus Tomlinson, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 671
Pages: 79–79

Head Matter:
Brandon WATSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF ABERDEEN; Aberdeen Police Department; PFC. Raul Fosmark; Detective John Divel; CPL. Craig Gentile; Harry Fredrick Budnick; Officer Thaddeus Tomlinson, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-1573
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: November 18, 2016
Decided: November 29, 2016
Jay Fred Cohen, Law Offices of Jay Fred Cohen, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Daniel Karp, Karpinski, Colaresi & Karp, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Brandon Watson appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Watson v. Aberdeen, No. 1:15-cv-00307-JKB, 2016 WL 1625970 (D. Md. Apr. 25, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process,
AFFIRMED