Case Name: Roy BEAMON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer CLARK, Pod Guard, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-06-25
Citations: 530 F. App'x 267
Docket Number: No. 13-6183
Parties: Roy BEAMON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer CLARK, Pod Guard, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 530
Pages: 267–268

Head Matter:
Roy BEAMON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer CLARK, Pod Guard, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 13-6183.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 20, 2013.
Decided: June 25, 2013.
Roy Beamon, Appellant Pro Se.
Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Roy Beamon appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Beamon v. Clark, No. 1:13-cv-00035-LMB-TRJ (E.D.Va. Jan. 10, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.