Case Name: Ryan BONNEAU, Petitioner-Appellant, v. J.E. THOMAS, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-05-13
Citations: 575 F. App'x 720
Docket Number: No. 12-35861
Parties: Ryan BONNEAU, Petitioner-Appellant, v. J.E. THOMAS, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 575
Pages: 720–720

Head Matter:
Ryan BONNEAU, Petitioner-Appellant, v. J.E. THOMAS, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 12-35861.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 13, 2014.
Filed May 22, 2014.
Ryan Bonneau, Portland, OR, pro se.
Ronald K. Silver, Kelly A. Zusman, Assistant U.S., Office Of The U.S. Attorney, Portland, OR, for Respondent-Appellee.
Before: CLIFTON, BEA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Federal prisoner Ryan Bonneau appeals pro se from the district court's judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition and its order denying his motion to set aside the judgment. We dismiss the appeal as moot.
Bonneau contends that his due process rights were violated at a prison disciplinary hearing in April 2011 that resulted in the loss of seven days of good-conduct time and the loss of telephone privileges. After filing his section 2241 petition, Bonneau completed the custodial portion of the sentence that he was serving at the time of the disciplinary hearing and was placed on supervised release. The record further reflects that, in December 2013, the district court revoked supervised release and imposed a new sentence. Because there is no injury than can be redressed with a favorable decision, the case is moot. See Burnett v. Lampert, 432 F.3d 996, 1000-01 (9th Cir.2005).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.