Case Name: Melody A. KLING, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. Dale G. KLING, Appellant/Cross-Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-12-22
Citations: 982 S.W.2d 820
Docket Number: Nos. ED 73205, ED 73227
Parties: Melody A. KLING, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. Dale G. KLING, Appellant/Cross-Respondent.
Judges: Before SIMON, P.J., and CRANE and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 982
Pages: 820–820

Head Matter:
Melody A. KLING, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. Dale G. KLING, Appellant/Cross-Respondent.
Nos. ED 73205, ED 73227.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Dec. 22, 1998.
Daniel L. Goldberg, St. Charles, for appellant.
Julius H. Berg, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before SIMON, P.J., and CRANE and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
In this consolidated appeal, Dale G. Kling appeals the denial of his motion to modify the maintenance provision of a dissolution decree, and Melody A. Kling appeals the trial court's failure to award her attorney's fees and costs. We find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo banc 1976).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value.
We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).