Case Name: Herbert Zelley, trading as Zelley Motor Company, complainant, v. Mae Shisler and Clifford Shisler, defendants
Court: New Jersey Court of Chancery
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1924-12-03
Citations: 3 N.J. Misc. 1
Docket Number: 
Parties: Herbert Zelley, trading as Zelley Motor Company, complainant, v. Mae Shisler and Clifford Shisler, defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 3
Pages: 1–2

Head Matter:
Herbert Zelley, trading as Zelley Motor Company, complainant, v. Mae Shisler and Clifford Shisler, defendants.
[Decided December 3d, 1924.]
Messrs. Wells & Tomlinson, for the complainant.
Mr. George M. Hillman, for the defendants.

Opinion:
-BrCHAYAY, V. C.
Complainant's bill is for a decree for specific performance of a contract alleged to have been made by both defendants with complainant. The proofs at the hearing entitle complainant to decree against the defendant Mae Shisler, but are, in my opinion, insufficient to establish either that the defendant Clifford Shisler was an actual party to the contract, or that he has estopped himself from denying that he was a party to the contract. As to him, complainant is' not entitled to1 relief.
Under the circumstances of the case no costs will- be allowed to either party.