Case Name: James Edward DAWKINS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Stephen DEWALT, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-05-23
Citations: 34 F. App'x 956
Docket Number: No. 02-6228
Parties: James Edward DAWKINS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Stephen DEWALT, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 34
Pages: 956–956

Head Matter:
James Edward DAWKINS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Stephen DEWALT, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 02-6228.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 16, 2002.
Decided May 23, 2002.
James Edward Dawkins, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
James Edward Dawkins appeals the district court's order dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Dawkins v. Dewalt, No. CA-02-10-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 22, 2002). We deny Dawkins' motion for the appointment of counsel at Government expense and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.