Case Name: Ulrich, Clerk, et al. v. O'Brien
Court: Supreme Court of Indiana
Jurisdiction: Indiana
Decision Date: 1904-06-01
Citations: 162 Ind. 695
Docket Number: No. 20,309
Parties: Ulrich, Clerk, et al. v. O’Brien.
Judges: 
Reporter: Indiana Reports
Volume: 162
Pages: 695–696

Head Matter:
Ulrich, Clerk, et al. v. O’Brien.
[No. 20,309.
Filed June 1, 1904.]
From Dearborn Circuit Court; G. E. Downey, Judge.
Action by Wm. H. O’Brien against John Ulrich and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.
Affirmed.
C. W. Miller, Attorney-General, A. C. Harris, F. L. Littleton, 1. J. Terhune, B. F. Ratcliff, R. H. Cobb and F. C. Cutter, for appellant.
A. G. Smith, J. W. Kern, G. Y. Menzies, T. P. Davis, S. M Ralston, M. A. Ryan, Bernard Korbly and Lincoln Dixon, for appellee.

Opinion:
Dowling, J.
The errors assigned and discussed in the brief of counsel for appellants in this case are identical with those in Brooks v. State, ex rel., ante, 568. The only matter in controversy is the validity of the apportionment act of March 9, 1903.
On the authority of Brooks v. State, ex. rel., supra, and without any intimation concerning the form of the action, the party plaintiff, or the relief sought, we hold that the said act is unconstitutional, and the judgment is affirmed.