Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roger Raymond GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-12-28
Citations: 262 F. App'x 54
Docket Number: No. 07-10131
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roger Raymond GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 262
Pages: 54–55

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roger Raymond GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-10131.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 3, 2007 .
Filed Dec. 28, 2007.
Glenn B. McCormick, Esq, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for PlaintiffAppellee.
Carmen L. Fischer, Esq., Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Roger Raymond Gonzalez appeals from the sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Gonzalez contends that the sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release is unreasonable. We conclude that the district court did take into account the appropriate sentencing factors and that the ultimate sentence imposed is not unreasonable. See Gall v. United States, — U.S.-, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); United States v. Plouffe, 445 F.3d 1126, 1131 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 2314, 164 L.Ed.2d 832 (2006).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.