Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Preciado ROBLES, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-06-28
Citations: 229 F. App'x 795
Docket Number: No. 07-4016
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Preciado ROBLES, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 229
Pages: 795–795

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Preciado ROBLES, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-4016.
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
June 28, 2007.
Elizabethanne C. Stevens, Office of the United States Attorney, District of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Robert Breeze, Salt Lake City, UT, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before KELLY, HENRY, and HARTZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER AND JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.
This matter is before the court on the government's motion to enforce the appeal waiver contained in defendant's plea agreement. The motion is filed pursuant to United States v. Hahn, 359 F.3d 1315 (10th Cir.2004) (en banc). In response, defendant concedes that the government's motion is well taken and that the appeal should be dismissed.
Accordingly, the government's motion is GRANTED, and the appeal is DISMISSED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.
This panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R.App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.