Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Monique Michelle ARP, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-02-10
Citations: 633 F. App'x 115
Docket Number: No. 15-7593
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Monique Michelle ARP, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 633
Pages: 115–115

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Monique Michelle ARP, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-7593.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 5, 2016.
Decided: Feb. 10, 2016.
Monique Michelle Arp, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Monique Michelle Arp appeals the district court's order denying her 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction based on U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual, App. C, Amend. 782 (2015). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error because Arp's sentence was the result of a Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(c)(1)(C) plea agreement. Arp's stipulated sentence was not based on the Sentencing Guidelines, so Amendment 782 does not apply. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Arp, No. 4:13-cr-00230-RBH-1 (D.S.C. Apr. 17, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.