Case Name: Robert FROST, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. George T. HAGAN, Warden, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-10-07
Citations: 144 F. App'x 999
Docket Number: No. 05-6771
Parties: Robert FROST, Jr., Plaintiff—Appellant, v. George T. HAGAN, Warden, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 144
Pages: 999–1000

Head Matter:
Robert FROST, Jr., Plaintiff—Appellant, v. George T. HAGAN, Warden, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 05-6771.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 29, 2005.
Decided Oct. 7, 2005.
Robert Frost, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Robert Frost, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The district court properly required exhaustion of administrative remedies under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) (2000). Because Frost did not demonstrate to the district court that he had exhausted administrative remedies or that such remedies were not available, the court's dismissal of the action, without prejudice, was not an abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Frost v. Hagan, No. CA-05-723-8 (D.S.C. April 28, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED