Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesus FLORES-CORREA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-03-07
Citations: 268 F. App'x 675
Docket Number: No. 06-30143
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesus FLORES-CORREA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 268
Pages: 675–676

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesus FLORES-CORREA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-30143.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 26, 2008.
Filed March 7, 2008.
Rafael M. Gonzalez, Jr., Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
J.D. Merris, Esq., Boise, ID, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: BEEZER, FERNANDEZ and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Jesus Flores-Correa appeals from the 77-month sentence imposed upon remand, following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Flores-Correa's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.