Case Name: Mike WILLOUGHBY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HENRICO COUNTY; Owen I. Ashman; Lee A. Harris, Jr.; Commonwealth of Virginia; Henrico County Commonwealth's Attorney Office, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-10-20
Citations: 584 F. App'x 180
Docket Number: No. 14-1673
Parties: Mike WILLOUGHBY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HENRICO COUNTY; Owen I. Ashman; Lee A. Harris, Jr.; Commonwealth of Virginia; Henrico County Commonwealth’s Attorney Office, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 584
Pages: 180–180

Head Matter:
Mike WILLOUGHBY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HENRICO COUNTY; Owen I. Ashman; Lee A. Harris, Jr.; Commonwealth of Virginia; Henrico County Commonwealth’s Attorney Office, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 14-1673.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 16, 2014.
Decided: Oct. 20, 2014.
Mike Willoughby, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Ramsey Newby, Office of the County Attorney, Henrico, Virginia; Sherry A. Fox, Thompson McMullan PC, Richmond, Virginia; Erin Rose McNeill, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Mike Willoughby appeals the district court's order denying relief on his complaint undér 42 U.S.C. § 12132 (2012), 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012), and state negligence law. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Willoughby v. Henrico (My., No. 3:14-cv-00223-HEH, 2014 WL 2925332 (E.D.Va. June 27, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.