Case Name: Beekman Family Association, Appellant, v. Town of Oyster Bay, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1996-06-10
Citations: 228 A.D.2d 460
Docket Number: 
Parties: Beekman Family Association, Appellant, v Town of Oyster Bay, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 228
Pages: 460–460

Head Matter:
Beekman Family Association, Appellant, v Town of Oyster Bay, Respondent.
[643 NYS2d 1023]

Opinion:
Contrary to the plaintiffs contention, the trial court's conclusion that the defendant did not breach the condition subsequent contained in the deed in question was based upon a fair interpretation of the evidence and was, therefore, not against the weight of the evidence (see, Greenberg v Behlen, 220 AD2d 720; Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129). Miller, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and McGinity, JJ., concur.