Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ignacio HERNANDEZ-AGUILAR, also known as Ignacio Avila-Baltazar, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-08-21
Citations: 236 F. App'x 121
Docket Number: No. 06-51218
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ignacio HERNANDEZ-AGUILAR, also known as Ignacio Avila-Baltazar, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 236
Pages: 121–121

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ignacio HERNANDEZ-AGUILAR, also known as Ignacio Avila-Baltazar, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-51218
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 21, 2007.
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Joe Albert Rivera, Law Offices of Joe A. Rivera, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant Appellant.
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Ignacio Hernandez-Aguilar has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Hernandez-Aguilar has filed a response. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Hernandez-Aguilar's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. See United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006). Our independent review of the record, counsel's brief, and Hernandez-Aguilar's response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.