Case Name: Eric Ennis RHOADS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-06-24
Citations: 620 So. 2d 1228
Docket Number: No. 80851
Parties: Eric Ennis RHOADS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 620
Pages: 1228–1228

Head Matter:
Eric Ennis RHOADS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 80851.
Supreme Court of Florida.
June 24, 1993.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Stephen Krosschell, Asst. Public Defender, Tenth Judicial Circuit, Bartow, for petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Ann P. Corcoran, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We review the decision of the district court of appeal, Rhoads v. State, 608 So.2d 817 (Fla. 2d DCA1992), on the ground of conflict. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418 (Fla.1981). The district court's decision is quashed and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with State v. Johnson, 616 So.2d 1 (Fla.1993).
It is so ordered.
BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.