Case Name: Lane, Appellant, v. Jacobs, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Common Pleas
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1889-04-01
Citations: 7 N.Y.S. 954
Docket Number: 
Parties: Lane, Appellant, v. Jacobs, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 7
Pages: 954–955

Head Matter:
Lane, Appellant, v. Jacobs, Respondent.
(Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.
April 1, 1889.)

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
After a re-examination of this case, we are of the opinion that the conclusion reached by us on the previous argument should not be dis turbed. It does not appear that any substantial fact has been disregarded, or any point of law overlooked; and, adhering to the rule expressed in Curley v. Tomlinson, 5 Daly, 283, we think this application should be denied.