Case Name: Rennick v. Walton
Court: Supreme Court of Missouri
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1842-04
Citations: 7 Mo. 292
Docket Number: 
Parties: Rennick v. Walton.
Judges: 
Reporter: Missouri Reports
Volume: 7
Pages: 292–292

Head Matter:
Rennick v. Walton.
A verdict found upon conflicting testimony will not bo disturbed by tills, court.
found u^on'st conflicting _ nof^distur-<-ourt this
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Lafayette county.
Burden for Appellant
French & Sawyer for Appellee.

Opinion:
Opinion of the Court, delivered by
Napton, Judge.
This was an action by petition in debt by William P. Walton against Andrew E. Rennick. Plaintiff obtained a verdict and judgment for nine hundred and sixty-eight dollars and eighty six cents. Plaintiff remitted sixty-five dollars. After yprdict, the defendant moved for a new trial, because the court had admitted improper and illegal testi-and because the verdict was against the weight of testimony. It does not appear from the bill of exceptions that defendant objected to the testimony when it was °®'ere^> aQd a verdict found upon conflicting testimony will not be disturbed by this court.
Judgment affirmed.