Case Name: In the Matter of Stephany C., Appellant, v. Jose C., Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2014-10-02
Citations: 121 A.D.3d 429
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Stephany C., Appellant, v Jose C., Respondent.
Judges: Concur — Tom, J.E, Friedman, Acosta, DeGrasse and Gische, JJ.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 121
Pages: 429–429

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Stephany C., Appellant, v Jose C., Respondent.
[992 NYS2d 889]

Opinion:
Order, Family Court, New York County (Fiordaliza A. Rodriguez, Ref.), entered on or about October 17, 2013, which, after a hearing, dismissed the petition by appellant mother for custody of the subject child, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Application by appellant's counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant's assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. The record demonstrates that appellant voluntarily appeared and submitted to the jurisdiction of the Circuit Court of Maryland, Baltimore County (Jan Marshall Alexander, J), which rendered a judgment of divorce and custody that resolved the custodial issues raised in her custody petition (see Matter of Tick v Tick, 96 AD2d 657, 657-658 [3d Dept 1983]).
Concur — Tom, J.E, Friedman, Acosta, DeGrasse and Gische, JJ.