Case Name: Aida DOMENECH, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Eliseo Domenech, and Elida Perez, Appellants, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, a foreign corporation, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1981-07-07
Citations: 402 So. 2d 437
Docket Number: No. 79-2422, 80-895
Parties: Aida DOMENECH, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Eliseo Domenech, and Elida Perez, Appellants, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, a foreign corporation, Appellee.
Judges: Before BARKDULL and DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 402
Pages: 437–437

Head Matter:
Aida DOMENECH, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Eliseo Domenech, and Elida Perez, Appellants, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, a foreign corporation, Appellee.
No. 79-2422, 80-895.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 7, 1981.
Rehearing Denied Sept. 9, 1981.
Stabinski, Funt, Levine & Vega and Regina F. Zelonker, Miami, for appellants.
Wicker, Smith, Blomqvist, Davant, Tu-tan, O’Hara & McCoy and Richard A. Sherman, Otis Smith, for appellee.
Before BARKDULL and DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellants' failure to offer proof sufficient to raise a jury question as to whether the design of the GM Step-Van, which allegedly caused her husband's death, was defective so as to cause an unreasonable risk of foreseeable injury, Ford Motor Co. v. Evancho, 327 So.2d 201 (Fla.1976), requires us to affirm the directed verdict entered in favor of General Motors Corporation. See Aetna Life & Casualty Company v. Little, 384 So.2d 213 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); Keyes Company v. Arvida Corporation, 360 So.2d 427 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). The appellants' other points on appeal are equally without merit.
Affirmed.