Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Carlos MARTINEZ-FLORES, also known as Jose Alvarado-Casas, also known as Carlos Martinez, also known as Carlos Martinez Flores, also known as Carlos Flores Martinez, also known as Jose Casas Alvarado, also known as Carlos Flores Trevino, also known as Jose Antonio Alvarado, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-12-08
Citations: 404 F. App'x 843
Docket Number: No. 10-20235
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Carlos MARTINEZ-FLORES, also known as Jose Alvarado-Casas, also known as Carlos Martinez, also known as Carlos Martinez Flores, also known as Carlos Flores Martinez, also known as Jose Casas Alvarado, also known as Carlos Flores Trevino, also known as Jose Antonio Alvarado, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 404
Pages: 843–844

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Carlos MARTINEZ-FLORES, also known as Jose Alvarado-Casas, also known as Carlos Martinez, also known as Carlos Martinez Flores, also known as Carlos Flores Martinez, also known as Jose Casas Alvarado, also known as Carlos Flores Trevino, also known as Jose Antonio Alvarado, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-20235
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 8, 2010.
James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Margaret Christina Ling, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before KING, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Carlos Martinez-Flores (Mar tinez) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Éd.2d 493 (1967). Martinez has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel's brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.