Case Name: In the Matter of Boleslaw Chmielewski, Respondent, v. City of New York et al., Appellants; In the Matter of Boleslaw Chmielewski, Respondent, v. Triboro Bridge and Tunnel Authority, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1984-03-29
Citations: 61 N.Y.2d 1010
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Boleslaw Chmielewski, Respondent, v City of New York et al., Appellants. In the Matter of Boleslaw Chmielewski, Respondent, v Triboro Bridge and Tunnel Authority, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 61
Pages: 1010–1011

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Boleslaw Chmielewski, Respondent, v City of New York et al., Appellants. In the Matter of Boleslaw Chmielewski, Respondent, v Triboro Bridge and Tunnel Authority, Appellant.
Decided March 29, 1984
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Frederick A. O. Schwarz, Jr., Corporation Counsel CMiriam Skolnick of counsel), for City of New York, appellant.
Lewis I. Wolf for Metropolitan Transportation Authority, appellant.
Stephen A. Weingrad for Triboro Bridge and Tunnel Authority, appellant.
William Greenberg for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court óf Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs. It cannot be said, as a matter of law, that the Appellate Division abused its discretion in granting petitioner's application to serve late notices of claim.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.