Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jeffrey D. Hanno, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1993-10-01
Citations: 197 A.D.2d 879
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jeffrey D. Hanno, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 197
Pages: 879–880

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jeffrey D. Hanno, Appellant.
[604 NYS2d 874]

Opinion:
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's application for youthful offender status (see, People v Cruickshank, 105 AD2d 325, 333-334, affd sub nom. People v Dawn Maria C., 67 NY2d 625; see also, People v Henninger, 185 AD2d 714, lv denied 80 NY2d 930). Furthermore, we decline as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice to vacate the conviction and adjudicate defendant a youthful offender (cf., People v Cruickshank, supra). We conclude that the sentence imposed was neither harsh nor excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Cayuga County Court, Corning, J.—Burglary, 3rd Degree.) Present— Callahan, J. P., Green, Fallon, Boomer and Davis, JJ.