Case Name: Joshua McDONALD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-02-15
Citations: 649 So. 2d 943
Docket Number: No. 94-0604
Parties: Joshua McDONALD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: GUNTHER, PARIENTE and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 649
Pages: 943–944

Head Matter:
Joshua McDONALD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 94-0604.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb. 15, 1995.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Paul E. Petillo, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Ettie Feistmann, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court's order denying the motion to suppress. However, we strike the special condition of probation prospectively imposing appellate costs. Davis v. State, 641 So.2d 972, 973 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Anderson v. State, 632 So.2d 132, 133 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).
GUNTHER, PARIENTE and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.