Case Name: In the Matter of the Estate of Hugo Zietz, Sr., Deceased. Willie Zietz, as Ancillary Administrator with the Will Annexed of Hugo Zietz, Sr., Deceased, Respondent; Madeleine Zietz-Halmos, Appellant. In the Matter of the Estate of Hedwig Zietz, Deceased. Willie Zietz, as Administrator of the Estate of Hedwig Zietz, Deceased, Respondent; Madeleine Zietz-Halmos, Appellant. In the Matter of the Estate of Hugo Zietz, Jr., Deceased. Willie Zietz, as Administrator of the Estate of Hugo Zietz, Jr., Deceased, Respondent; Madeleine Zietz-Halmos, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1956-04-26
Citations: 1 N.Y.2d 748
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Estate of Hugo Zietz, Sr., Deceased. Willie Zietz, as Ancillary Administrator with the Will Annexed of Hugo Zietz, Sr., Deceased, Respondent; Madeleine Zietz-Halmos, Appellant. In the Matter of the Estate of Hedwig Zietz, Deceased. Willie Zietz, as Administrator of the Estate of Hedwig Zietz, Deceased, Respondent; Madeleine Zietz-Halmos, Appellant. In the Matter of the Estate of Hugo Zietz, Jr., Deceased. Willie Zietz, as Administrator of the Estate of Hugo Zietz, Jr., Deceased, Respondent; Madeleine Zietz-Halmos, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 1
Pages: 748–749

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Estate of Hugo Zietz, Sr., Deceased. Willie Zietz, as Ancillary Administrator with the Will Annexed of Hugo Zietz, Sr., Deceased, Respondent; Madeleine Zietz-Halmos, Appellant. In the Matter of the Estate of Hedwig Zietz, Deceased. Willie Zietz, as Administrator of the Estate of Hedwig Zietz, Deceased, Respondent; Madeleine Zietz-Halmos, Appellant. In the Matter of the Estate of Hugo Zietz, Jr., Deceased. Willie Zietz, as Administrator of the Estate of Hugo Zietz, Jr., Deceased, Respondent; Madeleine Zietz-Halmos, Appellant.
Submitted April 16, 1956;
decided April 26, 1956.
Madeleine Zietz-Halmos, in person, for motion.
Otto C. Sommerich opposed.

Opinion:
Motion dismissed upon the ground that the papers were not served within the time fixed by subdivision 3 of section 592 of the Civil Practice Act.