Case Name: ANNA K. BARNEY, RESPONDENT, v. HUDSON AND MANHATTAN RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1930-02-03
Citations: 106 N.J.L. 230
Docket Number: 
Parties: ANNA K. BARNEY, RESPONDENT, v. HUDSON AND MANHATTAN RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 106
Pages: 230–231

Head Matter:
ANNA K. BARNEY, RESPONDENT, v. HUDSON AND MANHATTAN RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT.
Submitted May 31, 1929
Decided February 3, 1930.
Por the respondent, Jacob Feinberg and David Berman.
Por the appellant, Collins ■& Corbin.

Opinion:
Pee Cubiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Black, Campbell, Case, Bodine, Van Buskirk, MoGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.