Case Name: Irene MOJICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. GANNETT COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1993-03-04
Citations: 986 F.2d 1158
Docket Number: Nos. 91-3921, 92-1104
Parties: Irene MOJICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. GANNETT COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 986
Pages: 1158–1168

Head Matter:
Irene MOJICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. GANNETT COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee.
Nos. 91-3921, 92-1104.
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
March 4, 1993.
Armand L. Andry (argued), Oak Park, IL, for plaintiff-appellee.
Lawrence C. DiNardo (argued), Brenda H. Feis, Pamela J. Griffith, Seyfarth, Shaw, Fairweather & Geraldson, Chicago, IL, for defendant-appellant.
Fred Foreman, U.S. Atty., Criminal Div., Chicago, IL, Stuart M. Gerson, Office of U.S. Atty Gen., Jacob M. Lewis, Marleigh D. Dover, Dept. of Justice, Civil Div., Appellate Section, Washington, DC, for amicus curiae U.S.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Pursuant to Circuit Rule 40(f), on February 22, 1993, a majority of the members of this Court voted to hear this matter en banc, to decide whether the panel's proposed disposition of the matter conflicts with the holdings of Mozee v. American Commercial Marine Service Co., 963 F.2d 929 (7th Cir.1992), and Luddington v. Indiana Bell Telephone Co., 966 F.2d 225 (7th Cir.1992). The date for the oral argument will be set in due course.