Case Name: Jimmy MAGEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHAVEZ, Correctional Officer; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-01-11
Citations: 361 F. App'x 890
Docket Number: No. 09-15554
Parties: Jimmy MAGEE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. CHAVEZ, Correctional Officer; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 361
Pages: 890–891

Head Matter:
Jimmy MAGEE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. CHAVEZ, Correctional Officer; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
No. 09-15554.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 15, 2009.
Filed Jan. 11, 2010.
Jimmy Magee, Bakersfield, CA, pro se.
Stanton W. Lee, Esquire, Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes that this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Former California state prisoner Jimmy Magee appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, without prejudice, for failure to exhaust administrative remedies as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1117 (9th Cir.2003). We affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Magee's action because he did not complete the prison grievance process before filing suit in federal court. See McKinney v. Carey, 311 F.3d 1198, 1199 (9th Cir.2002) (per curiam) (holding that exhaustion under § 1997e(a) must occur prior to commencement of the action). Further, Ma-gee failed to show that he was prevented from exhausting before bringing suit.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.