Case Name: Belton HARRIS, Jr., a/k/a Lett, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; John J. Lamanna, Warden at FCI - Edgefield, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-10-24
Citations: 203 F. App'x 481
Docket Number: No. 06-7369
Parties: Belton HARRIS, Jr., a/k/a Lett, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; John J. Lamanna, Warden at FCI - Edgefield, Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 203
Pages: 481–482

Head Matter:
Belton HARRIS, Jr., a/k/a Lett, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; John J. Lamanna, Warden at FCI - Edgefield, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 06-7369.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 17, 2006.
Decided: Oct. 24, 2006.
Belton Harris, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Belton Harris, Jr. seeks to appeal the district court's judgment and order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Harris v. United States, No. 9:05-ev-02602-MJP (D.S.C. June 23, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
To the extent Harris may be seeking authorization under 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (2000) to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, we deny authorization.