Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael J. MAKI, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-10-03
Citations: 540 F. App'x 783
Docket Number: No. 12-30367
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael J. MAKI, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: RAWLINSON, N.R. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 540
Pages: 783–784

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael J. MAKI, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-30367.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 24, 2013.
Filed Oct. 3, 2013.
Helen J. Brunner, Esquire, J. Tate London, Mark Paul Parrent, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee.
Brooks Holland, Spokane, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: RAWLINSON, N.R. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Michael J. Maki appeals from the district court's judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 48-month sentence for conspiracy to distribute controlled substances, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C) and 846; and distribution of a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Maki's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Maki the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief as to Maki's conviction. We accordingly affirm Maki's conviction.
Maki waived the right to appeal his sentence. Because the record discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the sentencing waiver, we dismiss Maki's appeal as to his sentence. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir.2009).
Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED in part; DISMISSED in part.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.