Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Cornelius A. SUTTON, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2010-01-26
Citations: 302 S.W.3d 743
Docket Number: No. ED 92297
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Cornelius A. SUTTON, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 302
Pages: 743–744

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Cornelius A. SUTTON, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 92297.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Jan. 26, 2010.
Terrence M. Messonnier, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Margaret M. Johnston, Woodrail Cen-tre, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant, Cornelius A. Sutton, appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of involuntary manslaughter, in violation of section 565.024 RSMo (2000); robbery in the first degree, in violation of section 569.020 RSMo (2000); and burglary in the first degree, in violation"' of "section' 569.160 RSMo (2000). The trial court found defendant to be a prior and persistent offender and sentenced him to fifteen years imprisonment on the involuntary manslaughter count; life imprisonment on the robbery count; and thirty years imprisonment on the burglary count, to be served consecutively.
No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 80.25(b).