Case Name: In the Matter of Supplementary Proceedings: Axinn & Sons Lumber Co., Inc., Judgment Creditor, Respondent, v. Zygmunt Osinski, Judgment Debtor, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1934-12
Citations: 243 A.D. 559
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Supplementary Proceedings: Axinn & Sons Lumber Co., Inc., Judgment Creditor, Respondent, v. Zygmunt Osinski, Judgment Debtor, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 243
Pages: 559–559

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Supplementary Proceedings: Axinn & Sons Lumber Co., Inc., Judgment Creditor, Respondent, v. Zygmunt Osinski, Judgment Debtor, Appellant.

Opinion:
Order denying the motion by the judgment debtor to direct the judgment creditor or its attorney to file the examination had in supplementary proceedings reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Where an examination has been had of a judgment debtor pursuant to the provisions of the Civil Practice Act (§§ 773 or 773-a), the order and examination must be filed with the county clerk. (Renner v. Meyer, 22 Abb. N. C. 438; Fiske v. Twigg, 5 Civ. Pro. 41; Matter of Falkenburg, 19 Misc. 418; Sinnott v. First National Bank, 34 App. Div. 161.) The fact that the proceedings are instituted by the additional or alternative remedy by subpoena (§ 773-a) does not change the rule laid down in the cases cited. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.