Case Name: Raymond GONZALEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gary PENROD, San Bernardino County Sheriff, individual and official capacity and Schneider, San Bernardino County Deputy Sheriff, individual, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-10-04
Citations: 398 F. App'x 250
Docket Number: No. 09-55647
Parties: Raymond GONZALEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gary PENROD, San Bernardino County Sheriff, individual and official capacity and Schneider, San Bernardino County Deputy Sheriff, individual, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: WALLACE, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 398
Pages: 250–251

Head Matter:
Raymond GONZALEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gary PENROD, San Bernardino County Sheriff, individual and official capacity and Schneider, San Bernardino County Deputy Sheriff, individual, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 09-55647.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 22, 2010.
Filed Oct. 4, 2010.
Raymond Gonzalez, Imperial, CA, pro se.
Susan E. Coleman, Esquire, L. Trevor Grimm, Esquire, David J. Wilson, Man ning & Marder Kass Ellrod Ramirez LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: WALLACE, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
The district court properly dismissed the action because Raymond Gonzalez ("Gonzalez") failed to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing suit. See Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 90, 95, 126 S.Ct. 2378, 165 L.Ed.2d 368 (2006) ("proper exhaustion" under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) is mandatory and requires adherence to administrative procedural rules).
We decline to consider arguments presented for the first time on appeal. Smith v. Marsh, 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999).
Gonzalez's remaining contentions are unpersuasive.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.