Case Name: Margaret REAVES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING LLC; Litton Loan Servicing; Popular Financial; The Bank of New York Mellon, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-02-21
Citations: 676 F. App'x 217
Docket Number: No. 16-2017
Parties: Margaret REAVES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING LLC; Litton Loan Servicing; Popular Financial; The Bank of New York Mellon, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DUNCAN, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 676
Pages: 217–217

Head Matter:
Margaret REAVES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING LLC; Litton Loan Servicing; Popular Financial; The Bank of New York Mellon, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-2017
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: February 16, 2017
Decided: February 21, 2017
Margaret Reaves, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Michael Rowlson, BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DUNCAN, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Margaret Reaves seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing her civil complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-47, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). Because the deficiencies identified by the district court may be remedied by the filing of an amended complaint, we conclude that the order Reaves seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appeal-able interlocutory or collateral order. Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc'y, Inc., 807 F.3d 619, 623 (4th Cir. 2015); Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and remand the case to the district court with instructions to allow Reaves to file an amended complaint. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED AND REMANDED