Case Name: Timothy CLARIDY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-07-26
Citations: 474 F. App'x 300
Docket Number: No. 12-6644
Parties: Timothy CLARIDY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 474
Pages: 300–300

Head Matter:
Timothy CLARIDY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 12-6644.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 19, 2012.
Decided: July 26, 2012.
Timothy Claridy, Appellant Pro Se. Philip S. Jackson, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appel-lee.
Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Timothy Claridy appeals the district court's order dismissing as moot his motion for the return of property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Claridy v. United States, No. 1:11-cv-01620-RDB (D.Md. Mar. 28, 2012). We further grant Claridy's motion to file exhibits to his informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.