Case Name: CLAIRE PHILIPP, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ROBERT STAHL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 2002-06-12
Citations: 172 N.J. 293
Docket Number: 
Parties: CLAIRE PHILIPP, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ROBERT STAHL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 172
Pages: 293–293

Head Matter:
798 A.2d 83
CLAIRE PHILIPP, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ROBERT STAHL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Argued April 29, 2002
Decided June 12, 2002.
James G. O’Donohue argued the cause for appellant (Hill Wallack, attorneys).
Anthony B. Vignuolo argued the cause for respondent (Borrus, Goldin, Foley, Vignuolo, Hyman & Stahl, attorneys; Jack Borrus and Peter A. Vignuolo, of counsel and on the brief).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Wecker's dissenting opinion, reported at 344 N.J.Super. at 274, 781 A.2d 1065 (2001).
For reversal — Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices STEIN, COLEMAN, LONG, VERNIERO, LaVECCHIA, and ZAZZALI join in this opinion — 7.
Opposed — None.