Case Name: SIGAFOOS et ADMRS. v. MARKER et
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1927-06-03
Citations: 6 Ohio Law Abs. 311
Docket Number: 
Parties: SIGAFOOS et ADMRS. v. MARKER et.
Judges: (Ferneding, Kunkle and Allread, JJ., concur.)
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 6
Pages: 311–311

Head Matter:
SIGAFOOS et ADMRS. v. MARKER et.
Ohio Appeals, 2nd Dist., Darke Co.
Decided June 3, 1927.
John S. Hankins, Greenville, for Sigafoos et.
J. A. Kerr and E. H. Kerr, Tippecanoe City, for Marker et

Opinion:
BY THE COURT.
1. A proceeding to sell the real estate of the decedent allowed in the probate court, and also allowed on appeal in the Court of Common Pleas, is not appealable to the Court of Appeals.
2. An answer and cross petition, filed on leave in the Court of Common Pleas, which might have been properly filed in the Court of Probate, does not make an issue in chancery so as to sustain the right to appeal.
(Ferneding, Kunkle and Allread, JJ., concur.)
For reference to full opinion, see Omnibus Index, last page this issue.