Case Name: Daniel DAVIS, Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-11-20
Citations: 388 S.W.3d 251
Docket Number: No. ED 97855
Parties: Daniel DAVIS, Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and LISA S. VAN AMBURG, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 388
Pages: 251–251

Head Matter:
Daniel DAVIS, Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 97855.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Nov. 20, 2012.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Dec. 31, 2012.
N. Scott Rosenblum, Erin R. Griebel, Rosenblum, Schwartz, Rogers & Glass, P.C., Clayton, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Timothy A. Blackwell, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and LISA S. VAN AMBURG, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Daniel Davis appeals from the trial court's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Judgment sustaining the Director of the Department of Revenue's revocation of his driving privileges for refusing to submit to an alcohol test. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).