Case Name: Armando AMADOR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-03-21
Citations: 539 So. 2d 1180
Docket Number: No. 88-267
Parties: Armando AMADOR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before BARKDULL and BASKIN, JJ., and JOSEPH P. McNULTY, Associate Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 539
Pages: 1180–1180

Head Matter:
Armando AMADOR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 88-267.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 21, 1989.
Donald L. Ferguson, Coconut Grove, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Jacqueline M. Valdespino, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before BARKDULL and BASKIN, JJ., and JOSEPH P. McNULTY, Associate Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. Benefield v. State, 160 So. 2d 706 (Fla.1964); State v. Maya, 529 So.2d 1282 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); State v. Duda, 437 So.2d 794 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Mathes v. State, 375 So.2d 1084 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128, 99 S.Ct. 421, 58 L.Ed.2d 387 (1978); Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 98 S.Ct. 2674, 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978); Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 91 S.Ct. 2022, 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971); United States v. Garcia, 741 F.2d 363 (11th Cir.1984).