Case Name: Peerless Light Company, Appellant, v. Gimbel Brothers, Inc., Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1926-12
Citations: 218 A.D. 864
Docket Number: 
Parties: Peerless Light Company, Appellant, v. Gimbel Brothers, Inc., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 218
Pages: 864–864

Head Matter:
Peerless Light Company, Appellant, v. Gimbel Brothers, Inc., Respondent.

Opinion:
— Order granting leave to serve amended answer affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Kelly, P. J., Manning, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur; Lazansky, J., dissents, and votes for a modification to provide for the service of the answer to the amended complaint as proposed, except as to the defense that plaintiff was not authorized to do business in the State of New York. (See Wood & Selick v. Ball, 190 N. Y. 217.)