Case Name: Kemil A. MESAYS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-05-20
Citations: 63 F. App'x 166
Docket Number: No. 03-1213
Parties: Kemil A. MESAYS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 63
Pages: 166–167

Head Matter:
Kemil A. MESAYS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 03-1213.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 15, 2003.
Decided May 20, 2003.
Kemil A. Mesays, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Michael DiBiagio, United States Attorney, Ariana Wright Arnold, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
PER CURIAM.
Kamil A. Mesays appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Mesays v. Ashcroft, No. CA-02-3436-DKC (D. Md. filed Feb. 4, 2003 & entered Feb. 5, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.