Case Name: Ralph D. BULLAR, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Ivan R. BULLAR and Dorothea Bullar, et al., Defendants/Appellants
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2007-02-20
Citations: 218 S.W.3d 1
Docket Number: No. ED 88030
Parties: Ralph D. BULLAR, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Ivan R. BULLAR and Dorothea Bullar, et al., Defendants/Appellants.
Judges: Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 218
Pages: 1–2

Head Matter:
Ralph D. BULLAR, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Ivan R. BULLAR and Dorothea Bullar, et al., Defendants/Appellants.
No. ED 88030.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Feb. 20, 2007.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 29, 2007.
Stephen C. Banton, Manchester, MO, for Appellants.
Robert L. Swearingen,'St. Ann, MO, for Respondent.
Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Ivan R. Bullar and Dorothea Bullar (Ivan and Dorothea, respectively) appeal from the trial court's judgment removing Ivan as Successor Trustee of the Orbie D. Bullar Revocable Trust (Trust); declaring void certain deeds transferring 60 acres of real property from the Trust by Ivan, as Successor Trustee, to himself and his children; and ordering that Ralph D. Bullar, on behalf of the Trust, recover from Ivan and Dorothea $94,035.00 in Trust funds that they misused. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo.banc 1976). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).