Case Name: Gil W. JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of MARYLAND STATE'S ATTORNEY OFFICE, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-05-31
Citations: 432 F. App'x 262
Docket Number: No. 11-1274
Parties: Gil W. JONES, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. State of MARYLAND STATE’S ATTORNEY OFFICE, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 432
Pages: 262–262

Head Matter:
Gil W. JONES, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. State of MARYLAND STATE’S ATTORNEY OFFICE, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 11-1274.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 26, 2011.
Decided: May 31, 2011.
Gil W. Jones, Appellant Pro Se.
Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Gil W. Jones appeals the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his civil complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. Md. State's Attorney Office, No. 1:10-cv-03427-BEL (D.Md. Mar. 8, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.