Case Name: The State, ex rel. Kirtz, Appellant, v. Corrigan, Judge, Appellee
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1989-11-29
Citations: 47 Ohio St. 3d 45
Docket Number: No. 88-1183
Parties: The State, ex rel. Kirtz, Appellant, v. Corrigan, Judge, Appellee.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 47
Pages: 45–45

Head Matter:
The State, ex rel. Kirtz, Appellant, v. Corrigan, Judge, Appellee.
[Cite as State, ex rel. Kirtz, v. Corrigan (1989), 47 Ohio St. 3d 45.]
(No. 88-1183
Submitted October 24, 1989
Decided November 29, 1989.)
Russell P. Kirtz, pro se.
Daniel O. Corrigan, pro se.

Opinion:
Upon review of the matter presented to us, we find that appellant, Russell R. Kirtz, has stated a claim for relief. The judgment of the court of appeals dismissing appellant's complaint in mandamus is reversed and this cause is remanded to that court for further proceedings.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.