Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julio PACHECO-ADAME, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-05-30
Citations: 10 F. App'x 572
Docket Number: No. 00-10531; D.C. No. CR-00-00042-ECR
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julio PACHECO-ADAME, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before PREGERSON, FERNANDEZ and WARD LAW, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 10
Pages: 572–572

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julio PACHECO-ADAME, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 00-10531.
D.C. No. CR-00-00042-ECR.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 14, 2001 .
Decided May 30, 2001.
Before PREGERSON, FERNANDEZ and WARD LAW, Circuit Judges.
. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Julio Pacheco-Adame appeals the 57-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea for illegal entry of a deported alien. Pacheco-Adame contends that in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), it is illegal to impose a sentence in excess of the two-year maximum set forth in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) based upon a prior felony not pled in the indictment nor admitted as part of the plea. PachecoAdame also contends that Apprendi renders inapplicable Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998) (holding that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a sentencing factor and not a separate offense), because he did not admit to an aggravated felony at his plea hearing. His arguments are foreclosed by this court's recent decision in United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir.2000), amended (Feb.8, 2001) (order). United States v. Castillo Rivera, 244 F.3d 1020, 1024-1025 (9th Cir.2001).
AFFIRMED.
. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.