Case Name: Agnes Bernice HOLBROOK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Honorable Judge JONES; Unknown Persons at the Federal Prosecutor's Office, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-04-01
Citations: 516 F. App'x 263
Docket Number: No. 12-7869
Parties: Agnes Bernice HOLBROOK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Honorable Judge JONES; Unknown Persons at the Federal Prosecutor’s Office, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 516
Pages: 263–263

Head Matter:
Agnes Bernice HOLBROOK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Honorable Judge JONES; Unknown Persons at the Federal Prosecutor’s Office, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 12-7869.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 28, 2013.
Decided: April 1, 2013.
Agnes Holbrook, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Agnes Bernice Holbrook appeals the district court's order dismissing her civil action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Holbrook v. Jones, No. 7:12-cv-00380-MFU-RSB, 2012 WL 4892035 (WD.Va. Oct. 15, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
The claims against the district court judge were dismissed with prejudice, and the claims against the remaining defendants were dismissed without prejudice.