Case Name: Edgar THOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The State of SOUTH CAROLINA, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-09-28
Citations: 697 F. App'x 789
Docket Number: No. 17-1876
Parties: Edgar THOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The State of SOUTH CAROLINA, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 697
Pages: 789–790

Head Matter:
Edgar THOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The State of SOUTH CAROLINA, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 17-1876
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: September 26, 2017
Decided: September 28, 2017
Edgar Thomas, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Edgar Thomas appeals the district court's order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to dismiss Thomas' civil action without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and its order denying Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) relief. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thomas v. South Carolina, No. 3:17-cv-01345-CMC (D.S.C. June 27 & July 19, 2017); see also Robinson v. Wix Filtration Corp., 599 F.3d 403, 407 (4th Cir. 2010) (reviewing Rule 59(e) denial for abuse- of discretion). We dispense with oral argu ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED