Case Name: Daniel De Rosa et al., Respondents, v. George C. Tucker et al., Individually and as Trustees under the Will of Arthur C. Tucker, Deceased, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1946-11-18
Citations: 271 A.D.2d 835
Docket Number: 
Parties: Daniel De Rosa et al., Respondents, v. George C. Tucker et al., Individually and as Trustees under the Will of Arthur C. Tucker, Deceased, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 271
Pages: 835–836

Head Matter:
Daniel De Rosa et al., Respondents, v. George C. Tucker et al., Individually and as Trustees under the Will of Arthur C. Tucker, Deceased, Appellants.

Opinion:
Action to recover damages for alleged breach e£ contract to install a new roof "as soon as may conveniently be done" upon premises leased to respondents. Order denying appellants' motion to dismiss the complaint as legally insuffi eient, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. As used in the agreement, the words " as soon as may conveniently be done " mean " as soon as may reasonably be done under the circumstances." Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Aldrich and Nolan, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 927.]