Case Name: IN RE: Giuseppe PILEGGI, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-09-14
Citations: 697 F. App'x 203
Docket Number: No. 17-1676
Parties: IN RE: Giuseppe PILEGGI, Petitioner.
Judges: Before DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 697
Pages: 203–204

Head Matter:
IN RE: Giuseppe PILEGGI, Petitioner.
No. 17-1676
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: September 7, 2017
Decided: September 14, 2017
Giuseppe Pileggi, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Giuseppe Pileggi petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in acting on his Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(g) motion and 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court's docket reveals that the district court denied Pileggi's Rule 41(g) motion without prejudice by order entered July 26, 2017, and dismissed his § 2266 motion by order entered September 1, 2017. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Pileggi's motions, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED