Case Name: LAURIDSEN et al. v. ALEXANDER et al.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1926-12-20
Citations: 16 F.2d 432
Docket Number: No. 4744
Parties: LAURIDSEN et al. v. ALEXANDER et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 16
Pages: 432–433

Head Matter:
LAURIDSEN et al. v. ALEXANDER et al.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
December 20, 1926.)
No. 4744.
F. C. Reagan and Edwin H. Fbck, both of Seattle, Wash., for appellants.
Wesley Lloyd, of Tacoma, Wash., and Geox'ge Dysart and C. D. Cunningham, both of Centraba, Wash., for appebees.
Before RUDKIN, Circuit Judge, and DIETRICH and KERRIGAN, District Judges.
Rehearing denied February 14, 1927.

Opinion:
DIETRICH, District Judge.
In its legal aspect this case is identical with No. 4742, Katie Roberts Wilson v. Margaret Jane Robinson et al., 16 F.(2d) 431, this day decided, and for the reasons assigned in that case the decree is affirmed, as there modified.
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge, dissents, for the reason stated in Wilson v. Robinson, supra.