Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Paul M. WILLIAMS, Appellant; Paul M. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1994-06-21
Citations: 880 S.W.2d 583
Docket Number: Nos. 62441, 64232
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Paul M. WILLIAMS, Appellant. Paul M. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 880
Pages: 583–584

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Paul M. WILLIAMS, Appellant. Paul M. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 62441, 64232.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
June 21, 1994.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 4, 1994.
John A, Klosterman, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals after a jury convicted him of unlawful possession of a coneealable firearm and the motion court subsequently denied his motion for posteonviction relief. We find the findings of fact issued by the motion court are not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b). Further, we find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion and affirm by a written summary order. Rule 30.25(b). A memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision has been issued to the parties for their use only.