Case Name: THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. BERKELEY CHIROPRACTIC COLLEGE (a Corporation), Appellant
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1930-01-10
Citations: 103 Cal. App. 139
Docket Number: Civ. No. 7187
Parties: THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. BERKELEY CHIROPRACTIC COLLEGE (a Corporation), Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports
Volume: 103
Pages: 139–140

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 7187.
First Appellate District, Division One.
January 10, 1930.]
THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. BERKELEY CHIROPRACTIC COLLEGE (a Corporation), Appellant.
Sawyer & Sawyer, Frank Y. Sawyer and P. Purviance for Appellant.
IT. S. .Webb, Attorney-General, Leon French, Deputy Attorney-General, and Frank Y. Kington for Respondent.

Opinion:
THE COURT.
The attorney-general moves to dismiss the appeal herein upon the ground of the failure to file a transcript.
The motion is supported by the certificate of the county clerk and the facts stated therein are not contradicted. It appears therefrom that the only step taken by appellant in furtherance of the appeal was to file a notice of appeal on March 5, 1929. There has been no bill of exceptions proposed or settled as provided in section 650 of the Code of Civil Procedure, nor was any request filed for the preparation of a transcript in accordance with the provisions of section 953a of said code. No extensions of time have been granted to prepare the record on appeal under either method above mentioned, and the statutory period within which such a record may be prepared and filed has long since expired. It follows, therefore, that the appeal must be dismissed. (General Motors etc. Corp. v. Holman, 63 Cal. App. 17 [217 Pac. 1086]; Catania v, Guccione, 60 Cal. App. 717 [214 Pac. 495]; Rule V of the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal.) It is so ordered.
A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on February 8, 1930.