Case Name: BURGER KING CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Frieda Arkoulis KASTOGIANIS, as Administrator of the Estate of Gus Arkoulis, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1997-06-11
Citations: 696 So. 2d 884
Docket Number: No. 96-0438
Parties: BURGER KING CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Frieda Arkoulis KASTOGIANIS, as Administrator of the Estate of Gus Arkoulis, Appellee.
Judges: STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 696
Pages: 884–885

Head Matter:
BURGER KING CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Frieda Arkoulis KASTOGIANIS, as Administrator of the Estate of Gus Arkoulis, Appellee.
No. 96-0438.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
June 11, 1997.
Rehearing and Clarification Denied July 10, 1997.
Shelley H. Leinicke of Wicker, Smith, Tu-tan, O’Hara, McCoy, Graham, & Ford, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
Richard A. Kupfer of Richard A. Kupfer, P.A., and Wagner, Johnson, & McAfee, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
FARMER, Judge.
We affirm on all issues on the main appeal. In particular, we find no abuse of discretion in the grant of new trial because of erroneous instructions on the burden of proof. As to the issue on cross appeal, we expressly hold that the trial court is free in the new trial to revisit its earlier decision as to the admissibility of other acts to show foreseeability.
STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur.