Case Name: William HINTON, Appellant, v. Cranston MITCHELL, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-03-17
Citations: 962 S.W.2d 467
Docket Number: No. WD 54764
Parties: William HINTON, Appellant, v. Cranston MITCHELL, Respondent.
Judges: Before LAURA DENVIR STITH, P.J., and HANNA and RIEDERER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 962
Pages: 467–467

Head Matter:
William HINTON, Appellant, v. Cranston MITCHELL, Respondent.
No. WD 54764.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
March 17, 1998.
William Hinton, pro se.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Stephen D. Hawke, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before LAURA DENVIR STITH, P.J., and HANNA and RIEDERER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
William Hinton appeals from the dismissal of his writ of mandamus for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We dismiss the appeal.
Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we conclude the judgment should be affirmed. A published opinion would lack precedential value. A memorandum as to the reasons for our decision has been furnished to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).