Case Name: Toledo Bar Association v. Pommeranz
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1995-05-31
Citations: 72 Ohio St. 3d 274
Docket Number: No. 94-2666
Parties: Toledo Bar Association v. Pommeranz.
Judges: Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 72
Pages: 274–278

Head Matter:
Toledo Bar Association v. Pommeranz.
[Cite as Toledo Bar Assn. v. Pommeranz (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 274.]
(No. 94-2666
Submitted February 7, 1995
Decided May 31, 1995.)
Cooper, Straub, Walinski & Cramer and Keith Mitchell, for relator.
Lorin J. Zaner, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We have reviewed the record and concur in the board's findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Respondent is therefore suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of one year, but this sanction is suspended on the condition that he successfully completes a year of probation to be monitored by Jude T. Aubry. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Moyer, C.J., Wright and Cook, JJ., dissent.