Case Name: Lisa FISHMAN-STEIN, Stuart Fishman, and Julie Wren, Appellants, v. Alicia TESSLER, Elaine Bogin, Michael Tessler, and Brokerage Unlimited, Inc., Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2014-10-07
Citations: 451 S.W.3d 745
Docket Number: No. ED 100768
Parties: Lisa FISHMAN-STEIN, Stuart Fishman, and Julie Wren, Appellants, v. Alicia TESSLER, Elaine Bogin, Michael Tessler, and Brokerage Unlimited, Inc., Respondents.
Judges: Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and PHILIP M. HESS, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 451
Pages: 745–746

Head Matter:
Lisa FISHMAN-STEIN, Stuart Fishman, and Julie Wren, Appellants, v. Alicia TESSLER, Elaine Bogin, Michael Tessler, and Brokerage Unlimited, Inc., Respondents.
No. ED 100768.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Oct. 7, 2014.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 24, 2014.
Application for Transfer Denied Feb. 3, 2015.
Bradley Alan Winters, Michael J. Hart, Co-Counsel, Sher Corwin, LLC, Clayton, MO, for Appellants.
Julia Anne Todd-Farrell, Melissa Z. Baris, Co-Counsel, Husch Blackwell, LLP, Clayton, MO, for Respondents.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and PHILIP M. HESS, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Lisa Fishman-Stein, Stuart Fishman, and Julie Wren appeal from the trial court's judgment dismissing their petition alleging fraud, negligence, civil conspiracy, negligent misrepresentation, and prima fa-cie tort against Alicia Tessler, Elaine Bo-gin, Michael Tessler, and Brokerage Unlimited, Inc. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs, of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).