Case Name: NOLEN v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1913-12-17
Citations: 162 S.W. 869
Docket Number: 
Parties: NOLEN v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 162
Pages: 869–870

Head Matter:
NOLEN v. STATE.
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Dec. 17, 1913.
On Motion for Rehearing, Jan. 14, 1914.)
1. Criminal Law (§ 1099 ) — Appeal—Statement of Facts — File Marks.
A statement of facts, bearing no file marks and not showing when it was filed in the trial court, cannot be considered on appeal.
[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2866-2880; Dec. Dig. § 1099. ]
On Motion for Rehearing.
2. Criminal Law (§ 1099 ) — Appeal—Statement of Facts — File Marks.
Where the clerk of the trial court certified that he erroneously omitted the file marks from the transcript, the statement of facts must be considered on appeal.
[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2866-2880; Dec. Dig. § 1099. ]
S. Weapons (§ 17 ) — Carrying Concealed
Weapons — Evidence—Sueficiency.
Evidence held to sustain a conviction of unlawfully carrying a pistol.
[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Weapons, Cent. Dig. §§ 20, 22-33; Dee. Dig. § 17. ]
Appeal from Hardin County Court; W. W. Dies, Judge.
P. H. Nolen was convicted of unlawfully carrying a pistol, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
Singleton & Nall, of Kountze, for appellant. C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
For other oases see same topic and section NUMBER in Deo. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key-No. Series & Rep’r Indexes

Opinion:
HARPER, J.
Appellant was prosecuted and convicted of the offense of unlawfully carrying a pistol.
The statement of facts which accompanies the record bears no file marks, and does not show when it was filed in the trial court, and under such circumstances we are not authorized to consider it. Yet we have read it, and we feel constrained to say that the trial court was fully authorized to adjudge appellant guilty of the offense charged. A jury was waived and the issue submitted to the court, and if we considered the statement of facts it would authorize the court to arrive at the conclusion at which he did arrive — that appellant was guilty of the offense charged.
The judgment is affirmed.