Case Name: JOHN J. CRAIG ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. THE STATE, JAMES BRANDS, PROSECUTOR, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1887-11
Citations: 50 N.J.L. 176
Docket Number: 
Parties: JOHN J. CRAIG ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. THE STATE, JAMES BRANDS, PROSECUTOR, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
Judges: For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Chief Justice, Dixon, Reed, Van Syckel, Beown, Clement, Mc-Geeooe, Pateeson, Whitaker. 10.
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 50
Pages: 176–177

Head Matter:
JOHN J. CRAIG ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. THE STATE, JAMES BRANDS, PROSECUTOR, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
On error to the Supreme Court.
For opinion of the Supreme Court, see 20 Vroom 185.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment in this ease should be affirmed, for the reasons given by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Chief Justice, Dixon, Reed, Van Syckel, Beown, Clement, Mc-Geeooe, Pateeson, Whitaker. 10.
For reversal — None.