Case Name: Seeta ARRINGTON and William Roy Arrington, Plaintiffs, v. Clinton K. ROBERTSON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1941-05-29
Citations: 119 F.2d 1022
Docket Number: No. 7655
Parties: Seeta ARRINGTON and William Roy Arrington, Plaintiffs, v. Clinton K. ROBERTSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 119
Pages: 1022–1022

Head Matter:
Seeta ARRINGTON and William Roy Arrington, Plaintiffs, v. Clinton K. ROBERTSON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 7655.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
May 29, 1941.
Thomas E. Comber, Jr., of Philadelphia, Pa. (William H. James, of Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.
Louis S. Hankin, of Philadelphia, Pa. (B. Nathaniel Richter, of Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellees.
Before BIGGS, CLARK, and GOODRICH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is the second appeal in this litigation to this court. See Arrington v. Robertson, 3 Cir., 1940, 114 F.2d 821. We have examined the testimony herein fully and conclude that no substantial question is involved in this appeal and that we should not be justified in filling the space involved in printing the demonstration of that fact.
The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.