Case Name: ST. LOUIS COUNTY, Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Edwin FRANK and Ester Frank, Defendants/Appellants
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1997-01-21
Citations: 941 S.W.2d 561
Docket Number: No. 69926
Parties: ST. LOUIS COUNTY, Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Edwin FRANK and Ester Frank, Defendants/Appellants.
Judges: Before AHRENS, C.J., CRANDALL, J., and CHARLES B. BLACKMAR, Senior Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 941
Pages: 561–562

Head Matter:
ST. LOUIS COUNTY, Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Edwin FRANK and Ester Frank, Defendants/Appellants.
No. 69926.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Jan. 21, 1997.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 17, 1997.
Application to Transfer Denied April 29, 1997.
John G. Yound & Evan D. Buxner, St. Louis, for Defendants/Appellants.
John A. Ross & Patricia Redington, Clayton, for Plaintiff/Respondent.
Before AHRENS, C.J., CRANDALL, J., and CHARLES B. BLACKMAR, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendants appeal from the judgment entered on a jury verdict assessing damages in this condemnation action.
The evidence in support of the jury verdict is not insufficient; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).