Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John W. STEVENS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-10-30
Citations: 21 F. App'x 201
Docket Number: No. 01-7476
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John W. STEVENS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 21
Pages: 201–202

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John W. STEVENS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 01-7476.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 18, 2001.
Decided Oct. 30, 2001.
John W. Stevens, pro se.
Before DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
John W. Stevens seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his motion filed under Fed. R.Crim.P. 35, which the district court properly construed as a motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Stevens, Nos. CR-90-310, CA-01-2814-7-13 (D.S.C. July 10, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Generally, dismissals without prejudice are not appealable. Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066 (4th Cir.1993). We find, however, that the district court's order is a final, appealable order because the defect identified by the district court must be cured by something more than an amendment to the complaint. Id. at 1066-67.