Case Name: ROYAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, v. Rhea ABRAMS, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1929-12-17
Citations: 37 F.2d 93
Docket Number: No. 5825
Parties: ROYAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, v. Rhea ABRAMS, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 37
Pages: 93–93

Head Matter:
ROYAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, v. Rhea ABRAMS, Appellee.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
December 17, 1929.
Rehearing Denied January 28, 1930.
No. 5825.
Ford & Johnson, of San Francisco, Cal., and F. A. Cutler, of Burlingame, Cal., for appellant.
Joseph A. Brown, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee. ■
• Before RUDKIN, DIETRICH, and WILBUR, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.
In all respects this ease is like Royal Indemnity Company v. Moms (No. 5824) 37 F.(2d) 90, and by stipulation it is ruled by our decision in that ease.
Accordingly, the judgment will he reversed, with directions to take further proceedings not inconsistent with the views therein expressed.