Case Name: Ronald Nathan HOWARD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Lonnie M. SAUNDERS, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-10-31
Citations: 21 F. App'x 207
Docket Number: No. 01-7059
Parties: Ronald Nathan HOWARD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Lonnie M. SAUNDERS, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 21
Pages: 207–208

Head Matter:
Ronald Nathan HOWARD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Lonnie M. SAUNDERS, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 01-7059.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 28, 2001.
Decided Oct. 31, 2001.
Ronald Nathan Howard, pro se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for appellee.
Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Ronald Nathan Howard seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Howard v. Saunders, No. CA-00-663-3 (E.D.Va. May 15, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.