Case Name: REICH et al. v. VEGEX, Inc.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1943-06-21
Citations: 137 F.2d 647
Docket Number: No. 8203
Parties: REICH et al. v. VEGEX, Inc.
Judges: Before MARIS, JONES, and GOODRICH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 137
Pages: 647–648

Head Matter:
REICH et al. v. VEGEX, Inc.
No. 8203.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Argued May 3, 1943.
Decided June 21, 1943.
A. L. Shapiro, of Philadelphia, Pa. (Abraham Wernick, of Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel), for appellants.
R. Sturgis Ingersoll, of Philadelphia, Pa. (Ballard, Spahr, Andrews & Ingersoll, of Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.
Before MARIS, JONES, and GOODRICH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The sole question arising upon this appeal is whether the plaintiffs made out a prima facie cas.e .entitling them to relief. Federal Deposit Ins. Corporation v. Mason, 3 Cir., 1940, 115 F.2d 548; Schad v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation, 3 Cir., 136 F.2d 991. The district court in an opinion by Judge Welsh, 51 F.Supp. 99, carefully reviewed the evidence affer'ed on behalf of the plaintiffs and .'reached the conclusion that it was not i-sufficient ,to. establish a claim upon which -relief', co'uld be granted. The court accordingly -grgnted the defendant's motion for dismissal of the complaint under Civil Procedure Rule 41(b), 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. For the reasons satisfactorily and sufficiently set forth in Judge Welsh's opinion we think that the conclusion of the district court was correct.
The judgment of the district court is affirmed.'