Case Name: WILKERSON v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1926-11-10
Citations: 288 S.W. 452
Docket Number: No. 10391
Parties: WILKERSON v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 288
Pages: 452–453

Head Matter:
WILKERSON v. STATE.
(No. 10391.)
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Nov. 10, 1926.)
W. A. Anderson, oí San Angelo, and Clyde E. Thomas, of Big Springs, for appellant.
Sam D. Stinson, State’s Atty., of Austin,' and Robt. M. Lyles, Asst. State’s Atty., of Groesbeck, for the State.

Opinion:
HAWKINS, J.
Conviction is for transporting intoxicating liquor; punishment being one year in the penitentiary.
This is a companion case to Johnson v. State, reported in 104 Tex. Cr. R. 312, 283 S. W. 809. The facts are the same. Appellant testified that Johnson had bought the whisky from some Mexicans, who secreted it at the direction of Johnson; that later when the officers discovered appellant taking the whisky to the automobile he was doing so for Johnson, who intended taking it home to be used for medicine. The court told the jury if appellant was acting as Johnson's ag.ent in transporting the whisky, believing Johnson intended to use it for medicinal purposes, to acquit him. This sufficiently presented the defensive issue. A special charge was requested and refused, hut no notation of exception to the court's action appears on the charge; neither is it preserved in a separate bill. We have repeatedly held that under such conditions the refusal of the special charge cannot be reviewed. Linder v. State, 94 Tex. Cr. R. 316, 250 S. W. 703. See Wear v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 283 S. W. 811, for collation of authorities.
Finding no error in the record, the judgment is affirmed.