Case Name: HUMBLE OIL & REFINING COMPANY, Appellant, v. Noah S. CUTRER and Nicholas D. Olivier, Appellees; Noah S. CUTRER and Nicholas D. Olivier, Appellants, v. HUMBLE OIL & REFINING COMPANY, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1962-11-28
Citations: 309 F.2d 752
Docket Number: No. 19807
Parties: HUMBLE OIL & REFINING COMPANY, Appellant, v. Noah S. CUTRER and Nicholas D. Olivier, Appellees. Noah S. CUTRER and Nicholas D. Olivier, Appellants, v. HUMBLE OIL & REFINING COMPANY, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 309
Pages: 752–752

Head Matter:
HUMBLE OIL & REFINING COMPANY, Appellant, v. Noah S. CUTRER and Nicholas D. Olivier, Appellees. Noah S. CUTRER and Nicholas D. Olivier, Appellants, v. HUMBLE OIL & REFINING COMPANY, Appellee.
No. 19807.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
Nov. 28, 1962.
Rehearing Denied Dec. 27, 1962.
Andrew McCollam, Jr., L. K. Benson, H. H. Hillyer, Jr., W. J. McAnelly, Jr., Bernard J. Caillouet, Charles Janvier, New Orleans, La., for appellant.
Arthur C. Reuter, Reuter, Reuter & Schott, New Orleans, La., for Noah S. Cutrer and Nicholas D. Olivier.
Before HUTCHESON, CAMERON, and JONES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Finding ourselves in accord with the findings and conclusions of the district court as set forth in its opinion, we affirm its judgment for the reasons which it has assigned.
Affirmed.
. Cutrer v. Humble Oil & Refining Company, D.C., 202 F.Supp. 568.