Case Name: Alton McCALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-02-20
Citations: 810 So. 2d 995
Docket Number: No. 4D02-159
Parties: Alton McCALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: STONE, FARMER, and MAY, JJ„ concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 810
Pages: 995–996

Head Matter:
Alton McCALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D02-159.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb. 20, 2002.
Alton McCall, Coleman, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the order denying post-conviction relief. We certify the same ques tion certified in Stretcher v. State, 803 So.2d 813 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001):
WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?
STONE, FARMER, and MAY, JJ" concur.