Case Name: In re Stanley E. GREENIDGE, Respondent
Court: District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Decision Date: 2014-08-21
Citations: 97 A.3d 1043
Docket Number: No. 14-BG-481
Parties: In re Stanley E. GREENIDGE, Respondent.
Judges: Before BECKWITH, Associate Judge, and NEBEKER and TERRY, Senior Judges.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 97
Pages: 1043–1044

Head Matter:
In re Stanley E. GREENIDGE, Respondent.
No. 14-BG-481.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Filed Aug. 21, 2014.
Before BECKWITH, Associate Judge, and NEBEKER and TERRY, Senior Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
On consideration of the certified order suspending respondent for a period of one year, all but three months stayed, followed by a nine-month probation in the state of Massachusetts, this court's May 20, 2014, order directing respondent to show cause why reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, the statement of Bar Counsel, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file either a response to this court's order to show cause or the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is
ORDERED that Stanley E. Greenidge is hereby suspended for a period of one year, all but three months stayed, followed by a nine-month probationary period subject to the terms imposed by the state of Massachusetts. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C.2010), and In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate). It is
FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement the period of respondent's suspension will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g).