Case Name: William A. ROSS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. State of NORTH CAROLINA; Attorney General of North Carolina, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-05-04
Citations: 8 F. App'x 240
Docket Number: No. 01-6133
Parties: William A. ROSS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. State of NORTH CAROLINA; Attorney General of North Carolina, Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 8
Pages: 240–240

Head Matter:
William A. ROSS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. State of NORTH CAROLINA; Attorney General of North Carolina, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 01-6133.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 27, 2001.
Decided May 4, 2001.
William A. Ross, pro se.
Michael F. Easley, Clarence Joe Del-Forge, III, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, NC, for appellees.
Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
William A. Ross seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Ross' motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Ross v. North Carolina, No. CA-00-200-3-1-MU (W.D.N.C. Oct. 10, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.