Case Name: Marco Antonio JIMENEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF PHOENIX, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-05-28
Citations: 35 F. App'x 666
Docket Number: No. 01-16878; D.C. No. CV-98-01945-EHC
Parties: Marco Antonio JIMENEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF PHOENIX, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before FERNANDEZ, THOMAS, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 35
Pages: 666–667

Head Matter:
Marco Antonio JIMENEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF PHOENIX, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 01-16878.
D.C. No. CV-98-01945-EHC.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 13, 2002 .
Decided May 28, 2002.
Before FERNANDEZ, THOMAS, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Marco Antonio' Jimenez appeals the district court's order striking the "First Amended Complaint" he submitted seven months after entry of judgment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion, see Maljack Prods., Inc. v. GoodTimes Home Video Corp., 81 F.3d 881, 888 (9th Cir.1996), and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its order filed August 1, 2001.
Jimenez's remaining contentions are without merit.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.