Case Name: State of New York et al., Plaintiffs, v. Clark E. McLeod, Defendant. McLeodUSA, Incorporated, Intervenor-Appellant; Eliot Spitzer, as Attorney General of the State of New York, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2008-02-19
Citations: 10 N.Y.3d 758
Docket Number: 
Parties: State of New York et al., Plaintiffs, v Clark E. McLeod, Defendant. McLeodUSA, Incorporated, Intervenor-Appellant; Eliot Spitzer, as Attorney General of the State of New York, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 10
Pages: 758–758

Head Matter:
State of New York et al., Plaintiffs, v Clark E. McLeod, Defendant. McLeodUSA, Incorporated, Intervenor-Appellant; Eliot Spitzer, as Attorney General of the State of New York, Respondent.
Submitted January 7, 2008;
decided February 19, 2008

Opinion:
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution (Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals § 5:17, at 150 [3d ed rev]).