Case Name: WILLIAM KATZ, APPELLANT, v. ESSEX SALES COMPANY, RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1927-10-17
Citations: 104 N.J.L. 174
Docket Number: 
Parties: WILLIAM KATZ, APPELLANT, v. ESSEX SALES COMPANY, RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 104
Pages: 174–175

Head Matter:
WILLIAM KATZ, APPELLANT, v. ESSEX SALES COMPANY, RESPONDENT.
Argued May 20, 1927
Decided October 17, 1927.
Eor the appellant, Aaron Harder.
Eor the respondent, McCarter & English.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Paricer, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 12.
For reversal — Hone.