Case Name: INSITUFORM TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Insituform (Netherlands) B.V., and Insituform Gulf South, Inc., Plaintiffs-Cross Appellants, v. CAT CONTRACTING, INC., Firstliner U.S.A., Inc., and Giulio Catallo, Defendants-Appellants, and Michigan Sewer Construction Company, Defendant-Appellant, and Kanal Sanierung Hans Mueller Gmbh & Co. KG, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-01-21
Citations: 87 F. App'x 180
Docket Number: No. 99-1584, 00-1005
Parties: INSITUFORM TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Insituform (Netherlands) B.V., and Insituform Gulf South, Inc., Plaintiffs-Cross Appellants, v. CAT CONTRACTING, INC., Firstliner U.S.A., Inc., and Giulio Catallo, Defendants-Appellants, and Michigan Sewer Construction Company, Defendant-Appellant, and Kanal Sanierung Hans Mueller Gmbh & Co. KG, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 87
Pages: 180–181

Head Matter:
INSITUFORM TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Insituform (Netherlands) B.V., and Insituform Gulf South, Inc., Plaintiffs-Cross Appellants, v. CAT CONTRACTING, INC., Firstliner U.S.A., Inc., and Giulio Catallo, Defendants-Appellants, and Michigan Sewer Construction Company, Defendant-Appellant, and Kanal Sanierung Hans Mueller Gmbh & Co. KG, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 99-1584, 00-1005.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Jan. 21, 2004.
Before MAYER, Chief Judge, MICHEL, and SCHALL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Order for the court filed PER CURIAM. Dissenting order filed by SCHALL, Circuit Judge.
Upon consideration of the remand order of the Supreme Court, Insituform Techs., Inc. v. CAT Contr., Inc., 535 U.S. 1108, 122 S.Ct. 2322, 153 L.Ed.2d 151 (2002),
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
The judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, 90-CV-1690, is VACATED and the case is REMANDED for reconsideration in light of Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., 535 U.S. 722, 122 S.Ct. 1831, 152 L.Ed.2d 944 (2002), and Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., 344 F.3d 1359 (Fed.Cir.2003) (en banc).
SCHALL, Circuit Judge, dissenting.