Case Name: Jennifer MISSEY, Claimant/Appellant, v. SCHNUCKS MARKETS, INC., and Division of Employment Security, Respondents/Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-03-07
Citations: 185 S.W.3d 760
Docket Number: No. ED 86599
Parties: Jennifer MISSEY, Claimant/Appellant, v. SCHNUCKS MARKETS, INC., and Division of Employment Security, Respondents/Respondents.
Judges: Before NANNETTE A. BAKER, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 185
Pages: 760–761

Head Matter:
Jennifer MISSEY, Claimant/Appellant, v. SCHNUCKS MARKETS, INC., and Division of Employment Security, Respondents/Respondents.
No. ED 86599.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
March 7, 2006.
Jennifer Missey, De Soto, MO, pro se.
Ninion S. Riley, Attorney, Jefferson City, MO, for Division of Employment Security.
Schnucks Markets, Inc., St. Louis, MO, pro se.
Before NANNETTE A. BAKER, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Jennifer Missey (Claimant) appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) denying her claim for unemployment benefits. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the Commission did not err in finding that Claimant left her employment voluntarily without good cause attributable to such employment. Quik 'N Tasty Foods, Inc. v. Div. of Employment Sec., 17 S.W.3d 620, 625 (Mo.App. W.D.2000). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).