Case Name: EFFIE STINGER, Guardian of JEANNE ELIZABETH STINGER, Claimant-Respondent, v. DICKENS CONSOLIDATED MINES COMPANY, Operators, and C. A. PHILLIPS, Employers-Respondents, MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, Surety-Appellant, and AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, Surety-Respondent
Court: Idaho Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Idaho
Decision Date: 1927-07-25
Citations: 44 Idaho 558
Docket Number: No. 4988
Parties: EFFIE STINGER, Guardian of JEANNE ELIZABETH STINGER, Claimant-Respondent, v. DICKENS CONSOLIDATED MINES COMPANY, Operators, and C. A. PHILLIPS, Employers-Respondents, MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, Surety-Appellant, and AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, Surety-Respondent.
Judges: Wm. E. Lee, C. J., and Budge, G-ivens and T. Bailey Lee, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Idaho Reports
Volume: 44
Pages: 558–560

Head Matter:
(No. 4988.
July 25, 1927.)
EFFIE STINGER, Guardian of JEANNE ELIZABETH STINGER, Claimant-Respondent, v. DICKENS CONSOLIDATED MINES COMPANY, Operators, and C. A. PHILLIPS, Employers-Respondents, MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, Surety-Appellant, and AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, Surety-Respondent.
[258 Pac. 1117.]
N. D. Wernette, for Appellant.
Therrett Towles, for Respondent Stinger,
Harry M. Morey, J. Ward Arney and A. M. Waters, for Respondent Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Opinion:
TAYLOR, J.
This is an appeal by Maryland Casualty Company from a judgment rendered on appeal from an award by the Industrial Accident Board against it and Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, respondent, and others, for the death of one Frank Stinger.
We have thoroughly examined the record and conclude that the bond of appellant was not issued to cover, and was not liable for, injuries to employees of the association known as Dickens Consolidated Mines Company, Operators, of which deceased was an employee at the time of his injury. The findings and conclusions against appellant are not sup ported by the evidence, and the judgment thus far is erroneous.
It is ordered that the judgment against the appellant be vacated, annulled and held for naught, and, as to the remaining defendants, respondents, none of whom have appealed, it be affirmed. Costs to appellant.
Wm. E. Lee, C. J., and Budge, G-ivens and T. Bailey Lee, JJ., concur.