Case Name: Shawn BOYD, Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., as Trustee for Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-1 Asset-Backed Certificates Series 2006-1; Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., as Nominee for Home Loan Center, Inc., d/b/a Lending Tree Loans; Stephen G. Boyd a/k/a Stephan G. Boyd; John Doe; Jane Doe, as Unknown Tenant(s) in possession of the subject property, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2014-08-06
Citations: 143 So. 3d 1128
Docket Number: No. 4D13-208
Parties: Shawn BOYD, Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., as Trustee for Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-1 Asset-Backed Certificates Series 2006-1; Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., as Nominee for Home Loan Center, Inc., d/b/a Lending Tree Loans; Stephen G. Boyd a/k/a Stephan G. Boyd; John Doe; Jane Doe, as Unknown Tenant(s) in possession of the subject property, Appellees.
Judges: CIKLIN and FORST, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 143
Pages: 1128–1129

Head Matter:
Shawn BOYD, Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., as Trustee for Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-1 Asset-Backed Certificates Series 2006-1; Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., as Nominee for Home Loan Center, Inc., d/b/a Lending Tree Loans; Stephen G. Boyd a/k/a Stephan G. Boyd; John Doe; Jane Doe, as Unknown Tenant(s) in possession of the subject property, Appellees.
No. 4D13-208.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Aug. 6, 2014.
Russell L. Akins of Jeffrey A. Smith Law Group, Stuart, for appellant.
K. Denise Haire and Michael A. Rodriguez of Blank Rome LLP, Boca Raton, for appellee Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Opinion:
STEVENSON, J.
Shawn Boyd appeals from a final judgment of foreclosure. Because Wells Fargo failed to prove it had standing at the time it filed its foreclosure complaint, we reverse.
Wells Fargo filed its foreclosure complaint in February of 2008. Attached to this complaint was a mortgage showing DCS Mortgage, Inc., as the lender. DCS Mortgage then assigned the mortgage to Option One. Nowhere in the record is there an indication that Option One assigned the mortgage to Wells Fargo.
A de novo standard of review applies when reviewing whether a party has standing to bring an action. Dixon v. Express Equity Lending Grp., LLLP, 125 So.3d 965, 967 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (citing Westport Recovery Corp. v. Midas, 954 So.2d 750, 752 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)).
"'The party seeking foreclosure must present evidence that it owns and holds the note and mortgage in question in order to proceed with a foreclosure action.' " Servedio v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n, 46 So.3d 1105, 1107 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (quoting Lizio v. McCullom, 36 So.3d 927, 929 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)). To satisfy this burden, Wells Fargo was required to submit either "the note bearing a special endorsement in favor of the plaintiff, an assignment from payee to the plaintiff or an affidavit of ownership proving its status as holder of the note." Rigby v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 84 So.3d 1195, 1196 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (citing Servedio, 46 So.3d at 1107).
Here, Wells Fargo has provided no documentation which establishes that it had standing at the time it filed the foreclosure complaint. See Venture Holdings & Acquisitions Grp., LLC v. A.I.M. Funding Grp., LLC, 75 So.3d 773, 776 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) ("A party must have standing to file suit at its inception and may not remedy this defect by subsequently obtaining standing."). Although Wells Fargo eventually did file an Allonge to Note bearing a special endorsement in favor of it, the Allonge itself contains no date. See Rigby, 84 So.3d at 1196 ("The Bank has not shown that it was holder of the note at the time the complaint was filed. The note containing a special endorsement in favor of Bank was not dated."). Moreover, Wells Fargo was apparently never assigned the mortgage and the note. The only assignment in the record is from DCS to Option One. Finally, Wells Fargo did not submit "an affidavit of ownership proving its status as holder of the note." Id. (citing Servedio, 46 So.3d at 1107).
Accordingly, we reverse the final judgment of foreclosure.
Reversed.
CIKLIN and FORST, JJ., concur.