Case Name: IN RE: D.C. DIAMOND CORPORATION, Debtor, Tomislav Milic, Creditor-Appellant, v. Kevin R. McCarthy, Chapter 7 Trustee, Trustee-Appellee, and Developers Surety and Indemnity Company, Creditor; Stewart Title Guaranty Co., Creditor, Transferee of Old Line Bank, Successor to The Washington Savings Bank, FSB, Creditors, and D.C. Diamond Corporation, Debtor, and Judy A, Robbins, 11, Trustee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-04-27
Citations: 687 F. App'x 261
Docket Number: No. 16-2362
Parties: IN RE: D.C. DIAMOND CORPORATION, Debtor, Tomislav Milic, Creditor-Appellant, v. Kevin R. McCarthy, Chapter 7 Trustee, Trustee-Appellee, and Developers Surety and Indemnity Company, Creditor; Stewart Title Guaranty Co., Creditor, Transferee of Old Line Bank, Successor to The Washington Savings Bank, FSB, Creditors, and D.C. Diamond Corporation, Debtor, and Judy A, Robbins, 11, Trustee.
Judges: Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 687
Pages: 261–261

Head Matter:
IN RE: D.C. DIAMOND CORPORATION, Debtor, Tomislav Milic, Creditor-Appellant, v. Kevin R. McCarthy, Chapter 7 Trustee, Trustee-Appellee, and Developers Surety and Indemnity Company, Creditor; Stewart Title Guaranty Co., Creditor, Transferee of Old Line Bank, Successor to The Washington Savings Bank, FSB, Creditors, and D.C. Diamond Corporation, Debtor, and Judy A, Robbins, 11, Trustee.
No. 16-2362
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 25, 2017
Decided: April 27, 2017
Tomislav Milic, Appellant Pro Se.
Kevin R. McCarthy, MCCARTHY & WHITE, PLLC, McLean, Virginia, for Ap-pellee.
Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Tomislav Milic appeals from the district court's order dismissing his appeal from the bankruptcy court's order denying his motion for an expedited hearing on his objection to a sale that was previously approved by the bankruptcy court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the courts below. Milic v. McCarthy, Nos. 1:16-cv-01076-TSE-IDD, 12-16730-BFK (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 27, 2016; entered Oct. 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED