Case Name: The Estate of Thomas v. Service
Court: Supreme Court of Indiana
Jurisdiction: Indiana
Decision Date: 1883-05
Citations: 90 Ind. 128
Docket Number: No. 10,111
Parties: The Estate of Thomas v. Service.
Judges: 
Reporter: Indiana Reports
Volume: 90
Pages: 128–130

Head Matter:
No. 10,111.
The Estate of Thomas v. Service.
Supreme Court.— Practice„ — Assignment of fflror. — If the assignment of errors do not contain the full names of the parties, the appeal may be dismissed on motion made in apt time, and if it can not be found from the whole record who the parties are, the Supreme Court will, of its own motion, strike the case from the docket.
From the LaPorte Circuit Court.
J. A. Love and E. G. Thomas, for appellant.
L. A. Cole and G. H. Wilson, for appellee. '

Opinion:
Black, C.
— The appellee has moved to dismiss this appeal, for the reason that the assignment of errors does not conform to Rule 1 of this court, which requires that " The assignment of errors shall contain the full names of the parties," etc.
For names of parties, this assignment contains the following:
"In the Matter of the Glaim of George Service v. The Estate of William Thomas.
"The appellant, the Estate of William Thomas, deceased, for assignment of errors in said cause, says," etc.
. Under former decisions of this court, this is not a compliance with the rule. Estate of Peden v. Noland, 45 Ind. 354; State, ex rel., v. Delano, 34 Ind. 52; Louisville, etc., R. W. Co. v. Head, 71 Ind. 176; Kiley v. Perrin, 69 Ind. 387; Henderson v. Halliday, 10 Ind. 24.
The appeal should be dismissed.
Per Curiam. — It is ordered, upon the foregoing opinion, that the appeal be dismissed.