Case Name: Hiatt and Another v. Goblt and Another
Court: Supreme Court of Indiana
Jurisdiction: Indiana
Decision Date: 1862-05
Citations: 18 Ind. 494
Docket Number: 
Parties: Hiatt and Another v. Goblt and Another.
Judges: 
Reporter: Indiana Reports
Volume: 18
Pages: 494–495

Head Matter:
Hiatt and Another v. Goblt and Another.
In an action upon mortgage and notes, they should both be set out in, and made parts of, the complaint, either by filing the originals, or by copies, and merely filing them with the complaint, without any reference to them in it, is not sufficient.
APPEAL from the Henry Circuit Court.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
In this suit, to foreclose a mortgage, copies of the mortgage and notes were not made parts of the complaint, and thus identified, either by being copied into the complaint, or by reference in the complaint to copies or originals filed with it, although a mortgage and notes were filed' with the complaint. Nor was a copy of either one of them filed, or referred to in the complaint. The complaint was bad.
M. L. Bundy, Smith § Smith, and Thos. A. Hendricks, for the appellants.
J. H. Mellett, and Martindale &¡ Grubbs, for the appellees.
The judgment is reversed, with costs. Cause remanded for a new trial, with leave to amend. See 2 G. & H. p. 375.