Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gustavo CRUZ-ROMAN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-11-21
Citations: 255 F. App'x 205
Docket Number: No. 06-10422
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Gustavo CRUZ-ROMAN, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: TROTT, W. FLETCHER and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 255
Pages: 205–206

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Gustavo CRUZ-ROMAN, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 06-10422.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 13, 2007.
Filed Nov. 21, 2007.
Raynette M. Logan, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Gail Gianasi Natale, Esq., Law Office of Gail Gianasi Natale, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: TROTT, W. FLETCHER and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Gustavo Cruz-Roman appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 46-month sentence for transporting illegal aliens, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(l)(A)(ii). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Cruz-Roman's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Cruz-Roman has filed a notice of filing sealed documents replacing several pages in the excerpt of record. The Clerk shall file under seal the supplemental substitute excerpt of record received on February 8, 2007.
Because our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82-83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), indicates that Cruz-Roman waived his right to appeal and was sentenced within the terms of the plea agreement, we enforce the waiver and dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2000).
Counsel's motion to withdraw is granted.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.