Case Name: Leo T. BELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-06-02
Citations: 758 So. 2d 1266
Docket Number: No. 5D99-887
Parties: Leo T. BELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ANTOON, C.J., SAWAYA and PLEUS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 758
Pages: 1266–1266

Head Matter:
Leo T. BELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D99-887.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
June 2, 2000.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Barbara C. Davis, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
A defendant is not at liberty to complain about a prosecutor's comments in closing argument when the comment is an invited response. See Parker v. State, 641 So.2d 369 (Fla.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1131, 115 S.Ct. 944, 130 L.Ed.2d 888 (1995).
AFFIRMED.
ANTOON, C.J., SAWAYA and PLEUS, JJ., concur.