Case Name: STRAUSS EQUIPMENT COMPANY AND SYDNEY PERKINS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, v. CHARLES WILSON AND ABE NELSON, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1931-11-23
Citations: 9 N.J. Misc. 1206
Docket Number: 
Parties: STRAUSS EQUIPMENT COMPANY AND SYDNEY PERKINS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, v. CHARLES WILSON AND ABE NELSON, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 9
Pages: 1206–1206

Head Matter:
STRAUSS EQUIPMENT COMPANY AND SYDNEY PERKINS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, v. CHARLES WILSON AND ABE NELSON, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Submitted October 16, 1931
Decided November 23, 1931.
Before Justices Campbell, Lloyd and Bodine.
Eor the defendant-appellant Charles Wilson, Maurice J.. McKeown.
Eor the plaintiffs-appellees, Mantel & Kaplon.

Opinion:
Pee Ctjeiam.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the Elizabeth District Court. The trial judge sitting without a jury found that the damages for which the plaintiff' sought recovery were caused by the negligent operation of the-defendant's car by the defendant's agent.
The proofs set forth in the settled state of the ease indicate-not only that there was adequate proof to support the findings of negligence but also agency.
The judgment will therefore he affirmed, with costs.