Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Darrion GUTHRIE, Appellant; Darrion GUTHRIE, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1997-06-10
Citations: 946 S.W.2d 769
Docket Number: Nos. 67851, 71663
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Darrion GUTHRIE, Appellant. Darrion GUTHRIE, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before RHODES RUSSELL, P.J., and SIMON and KAROHL, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 946
Pages: 769–769

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Darrion GUTHRIE, Appellant. Darrion GUTHRIE, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 67851, 71663.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
June 10, 1997.
Gwenda R. Robinson, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, David R. Truman, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for Respondent.
Before RHODES RUSSELL, P.J., and SIMON and KAROHL, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant appeals after sentencing on charge of rape, § 566.060 RSMo Cum.Supp.1992, and denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The direct appeal issues are without merit. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).