Case Name: STATE of Maine v. Richard PROVENCHER
Court: Maine Supreme Judicial Court
Jurisdiction: Maine
Decision Date: 1988-02-04
Citations: 536 A.2d 1123
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE of Maine v. Richard PROVENCHER
Judges: Before NICHOLS, ROBERTS, WATHEN, GLASSMAN, SCOLNIK and CLIFFORD, JJ.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 536
Pages: 1123–1124

Head Matter:
STATE of Maine v. Richard PROVENCHER
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.
Argued Nov. 17, 1987.
Decided Feb. 4, 1988.
Mary Tousignant, Dist. Atty., Anne Jordan, (orally), Asst. Dist. Atty., Alfred, for plaintiff.
Thomas VanHouten (orally), Wood & VanHouten, Sanford, for defendant.
Before NICHOLS, ROBERTS, WATHEN, GLASSMAN, SCOLNIK and CLIFFORD, JJ.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
By his appeal from his conviction in the Superior Court (York County) of trafficking in cocaine, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1103, the Defendant, Richard Provencher, asserts for the first time that the court erred in its instructions on entrapment and in not ordering a pre-sentence investigation and report as a prerequisite to his sentencing.
Our review of the record discloses the instruction was proper, State v. Turner, 495 A.2d 1211, 1213 (Me.1985), and the court did not err in determining not to order a pre-sentence investigation and report. M.R.Crim.P. 32(c)(1).
The entry is:
Judgment affirmed.
All concurring.