Case Name: Charles C. CHIDIAC, Appellant, v. Mahmoud Mohammed FUSTOK, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1984-02-07
Citations: 444 So. 2d 1122
Docket Number: No. 83-1075
Parties: Charles C. CHIDIAC, Appellant, v. Mahmoud Mohammed FUSTOK, Appellee.
Judges: Before HENDRY, BASKIN and JOR-GENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 444
Pages: 1122–1122

Head Matter:
Charles C. CHIDIAC, Appellant, v. Mahmoud Mohammed FUSTOK, Appellee.
No. 83-1075.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 7, 1984.
Kimbrell, Hamann, Jennings, Womack, Carlson & Kniskern and Warren Hamann and Roy D. Wasson, Miami, Hansell & Post, Atlanta, Ga., for appellant.
Frates, Bienstock & Sheehe, Terry Bien-stock and Lauri Waldman, Miami, Curtis, Mallett-Prevost, Colt & Mosle, Herbert Stoller and Eliot Lauer, New York City, for appellee.
Before HENDRY, BASKIN and JOR-GENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Because the defendant and the subject matter of this litigation are in Florida, section 48.193, Florida Statutes (1981), is not implicated and the order appealed is, therefore, reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.