Case Name: David RENCZKOWSKI, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2018-11-13
Citations: 259 So. 3d 93
Docket Number: CASE NO.: 2D18-4382
Parties: David RENCZKOWSKI, Appellant/Petitioner(s),
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
Judges: LaROSE, C.J., and NORTHCUTT and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 259
Pages: 93–93

Head Matter:
David RENCZKOWSKI, Appellant/Petitioner(s),
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).
CASE NO.: 2D18-4382
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
November 13, 2018
BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Opinion:
Based on review of the circuit court docket, it appears that petitioner's petition and supplemental petition for writ of prohibition are challenging his continued prosecution in circuit court case number 18-CF-1130. Because the docket indicates that the petitioner is represented by counsel in circuit court case number 18-CF-1130, the petition and supplemental petition for writ of prohibition are dismissed. See Logan v. State, 846 So. 2d 472 (Fla. 2003). Petitioner may challenge this conclusion by filing a motion for rehearing, under oath, within 15 days of the date of this order.
LaROSE, C.J., and NORTHCUTT and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.