Case Name: State of Connecticut v. Jeffrey A. Walker
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1991-06-04
Citations: 24 Conn. App. 737
Docket Number: 9316
Parties: State of Connecticut v. Jeffrey A. Walker
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Appellate Reports
Volume: 24
Pages: 737–739

Head Matter:
State of Connecticut v. Jeffrey A. Walker
(9316)
O’Connell, Norcott and Heiman, Js.
Argued April 30
decision released June 4, 1991
KentDrager, assistant public defender, with whom, on the brief, was G. Douglas Nash, public defender, for the appellant (defendant).
Carolyn K. Longstreth, assistant state’s attorney, with whom were Frank McQuade, assistant state’s attorney, and, on the brief, Mary Galvin, state’s attorney, for the appellee (state).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This is an appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered after the defendant had entered a plea of guilty to a single count of carrying a pistol without a permit in violation of General Statutes § 29-35, under the doctrine of North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S. Ct. 160, 27 L. Ed. 2d 162 (1970).
In his appeal, the defendant asserts that the trial court acted improperly in accepting the plea and in finding it to have been entered knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily because the factual basis advanced by the state was inadequate, lacking specificity as to a neces sary element of the offense—that the length of the barrel of the pistol was less than twelve inches. General Statutes § 29-27.
On the basis of our decision in State v. Brown, 19 Conn. App. 640, 563 A.2d 1379, cert. denied, 212 Conn. 821, 565 A.2d 540 (1989), we conclude that the claims of the defendant are without merit. See Paulsen v. Manson, 203 Conn. 484, 525 A.2d 1315 (1987); see also Tyson v. Warden, 24 Conn. App. 729, 591 A.2d 817 (1991).
The judgment is affirmed.