Case Name: Flack, Appellant, v. Karr et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1892-11-22
Citations: 20 N.Y.S. 986
Docket Number: 
Parties: Flack, Appellant, v. Karr et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 20
Pages: 986–986

Head Matter:
Flack, Appellant, v. Karr et al., Respondents.
(Supreme Court, General Term, Third Department.
November 22, 1892.)
Action by William H. Flack against George Karr and another on contract. Judgment of nonsuit. Plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
Argued before Mayham, P. J., and Putnam and Herrick, JJ.
Cantwell & Cantwell, (Thomas Cantwell, of counsel,) for appellant. Wallace MacFarlane, for respondents.

Opinion:
Putnam, J.
Judgment should be affirmed. I think no opinion is required. The trial judge, in granting the nonsuit, took the correct view of the case. All concur.