Case Name: John FANNING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-01-20
Citations: 537 So. 2d 197
Docket Number: No. 87-1928
Parties: John FANNING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: RYDER, A.C.J., and FRANK and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 537
Pages: 197–198

Head Matter:
John FANNING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 87-1928.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Jan. 20, 1989.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and T. Orín Lee, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Peggy A. Quince, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in imposing court costs and attorney fees without notice or the opportunity to be heard. Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984). Accordingly, we strike the cost provision without prejudice to the state to seek reassessment after proper notice to appellant. The judgments and sentences are affirmed in all other respects.
RYDER, A.C.J., and FRANK and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.