Case Name: Percy BADHAM, Appellant, v. Eugene ALEXANDER, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1952-02-20
Citations: 194 F.2d 535
Docket Number: No. 11447
Parties: Percy BADHAM, Appellant, v. Eugene ALEXANDER, Appellee.
Judges: Before HICKS, Chief Judge, and SIMONS and ALLEN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 194
Pages: 535–535

Head Matter:
Percy BADHAM, Appellant, v. Eugene ALEXANDER, Appellee.
No. 11447.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
Feb. 20, 1952.
Raymond C. Stephenson and Hottell, Stephenson & Allen, all of Louisville, Ky., for appellant.
Garland R. Hubbard, Louisville, Ky., and James W. Aird, Birmingham, Ala., for appellee.
Before HICKS, Chief Judge, and SIMONS and ALLEN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the briefs and record in the above-entitled causes and the oral arguments had therein, it appears that there are no reversible errors committed at the trial in rulings or instructions to the jury that were prejudicial, or m respect to which appropriate objections were preserved for review; therefore,
The judgment below is affirmed.