Case Name: Andrew Lynn WALTERS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2014-02-11
Citations: 422 S.W.3d 534
Docket Number: No. ED 99625
Parties: Andrew Lynn WALTERS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before MARY K. HOFF, P. J., KURT S. ODENWALD, J., and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 422
Pages: 534–534

Head Matter:
Andrew Lynn WALTERS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 99625.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Feb. 11, 2014.
Before MARY K. HOFF, P. J., KURT S. ODENWALD, J., and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Andrew Lynn Walters appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.15, following an evidentia-ry hearing. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).