Case Name: Rodney Victor HARRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bret RADER, Property Manager, Giles County Housing and Development Corporation; Ann Angert, President of Giles County Housing and Development Corporation and President of GPL, Inc.; Darren Light, Vice President of GPL, Inc., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-07-01
Citations: 101 F. App'x 917
Docket Number: No. 03-2465
Parties: Rodney Victor HARRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bret RADER, Property Manager, Giles County Housing and Development Corporation; Ann Angert, President of Giles County Housing and Develop ment Corporation and President of GPL, Inc.; Darren Light, Vice President of GPL, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 101
Pages: 917–918

Head Matter:
Rodney Victor HARRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bret RADER, Property Manager, Giles County Housing and Development Corporation; Ann Angert, President of Giles County Housing and Develop ment Corporation and President of GPL, Inc.; Darren Light, Vice President of GPL, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 03-2465.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted June 16, 2004.
Decided July 1, 2004.
Rodney Victor Harris, Appellant pro se. Kenneth John Ries, Johnson, Ayers & Matthews, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Rodney Victor Harris appeals the district court's order dismissing his complaint alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny Harris's motion for a continuance and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Harris v. Rader, No. CA-03-572-7 (W.D.Va. Nov. 13, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED