Case Name: AMBASSADOR SERVICES, INC., Petitioner-Cross Respondent, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent-Cross Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-11-17
Citations: 622 F. App'x 891
Docket Number: No. 14-15341
Parties: AMBASSADOR SERVICES, INC., Petitioner-Cross Respondent, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent-Cross Petitioner.
Judges: Before HULL and WILSON, Circuit Judges, and MARTINEZ, District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 622
Pages: 891–892

Head Matter:
AMBASSADOR SERVICES, INC., Petitioner-Cross Respondent, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent-Cross Petitioner.
No. 14-15341.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Nov. 17, 2015.
Matthew Trainor Gomes, Weinberg Wheeler Hudgins Gunn & Dial, LLC, Atlanta, GA, for Petitioner-Cross Respondent.
Linda Dreeben, Robert James Engle-hart, Gregoire Sauter, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, Margaret J. Diaz, Christopher Zerby, National Labor Relations Board, Tampa, FL, Neil Flaxman, Neil Flaxman Professional Association, Miami, FL, for RespondenNCross Petitioner.
Before HULL and WILSON, Circuit Judges, and MARTINEZ, District Judge.
Honorable Jose E. Martinez, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Florida, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
We vacate our previous opinion, filed on November 12, 2015,- and substitute this opinion in its place.
Ambassador Services, Inc. ("Ambassador") petitions this Court for review of the National Labor Relations Board's Decision and Order, which found Ambassador in violation of Sections 8(a)(1) and 8(a)(5) of the National Labor Relations Act (the "NLRA"), 29 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1), (5). The Board cross-petitions for enforcement of its order.
On appeal, Ambassador claims that substantial evidence did not support the Board's decisions that
• John Martin was not a statutory supervisor;
• Donnie May's conduct violated NLRA § 8(a)(1);
• Ambassador's safety rule prohibiting "walking off the job" violated NLRA § 8(a)(1);
• Ambassador did not establish that a majority of employees signed the de-certification petition; and
• Ambassador unlawfully failed and refused to recognize and bargain with the Union.
After oral argument and careful consideration of the entire record and all of the merits issues, we conclude that substantial evidence supported the Board's determinations. Thus, we affirm the Board's decision and grant the Board's' petition for enforcement.
For the foregoing reasons, we DENY Ambassador's petition for review and GRANT the Board's cross-petition for enforcement of its order in full.