Case Name: Betty MORGAN, Appellant, v. MERAMEC VALLEY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-11-21
Citations: 206 S.W.3d 368
Docket Number: No. ED 87696
Parties: Betty MORGAN, Appellant, v. MERAMEC VALLEY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J. and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR. and NANNETTE A. BAKER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 206
Pages: 368–369

Head Matter:
Betty MORGAN, Appellant, v. MERAMEC VALLEY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.
No. ED 87696.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Southern Division.
Nov. 21, 2006.
Lenzie L. Leftridge, Jr., Part Hill, MO, for appellant.
Daniel E. Wilke, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J. and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR. and NANNETTE A. BAKER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Betty Morgan appeals from the dismissal of her petition for damages on a fire insurance policy with Meramec Valley Mutual Insurance Company.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).