Case Name: DILBECK v. FRANCIS et al.
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1917-01-09
Citations: 63 Okla. 78
Docket Number: No. 8831
Parties: DILBECK v. FRANCIS et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 63
Pages: 78–79

Head Matter:
DILBECK v. FRANCIS et al.
No. 8831
Opinion Filed Jan. 9, 1917.
(162 Pac. 488.)
(Syllabus by the Court.)
Appeal and Error — Perfection of Appeal — Dismissal.
Where the petition in error is not filed in (he Supreme Court within six months from the rendition of the judgment or final order complained of as required by chapter IS. Sess. Laws 1910-11, the appeal will be dismissed.
Error from District Court, McClain County ; F. B. Swank, Judge.
Action by Benjamin II. Dilbeek against AYilliam C. Francis and others. There was a judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
Dismissed.
J. W. Bartholomew and C. G. Moore, for plaintiff in error.
Franklin & Mauldin, for defendants in error.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff in' error brought this action in the district court of McClain county against defendants in error to have set aside and canceled certain deeds and mortgages and to quiet title to certain described lands. Judgment was rendered in favor of defendants. Motion for new trial was overruled on June 27, 1916. Petition in error with case-made attached was filed in this court on December 28, 1916.
It is urged that this appeal should be dismissed because not brought within the time •provided by statute. It clearly appears that 1lie appeal was not brought within six months from the rendition of the judgment or final order sought to be reviewed, and for that reason the appeal is dismissed. Colter v. Martin. 43 Okla. 618, 143 Pac. 660; Comanche Mer. Co. v. Curlee Clothing Co., 44 Okla. 73, 143 Pac. 190; Phillips v. Dillingham, 44 Okla. 102, 144 Pac. 363.
Dismissed.