Case Name: AIRLIFT INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1972-06-09
Citations: 460 F.2d 1065
Docket Number: No. 72-1435
Parties: AIRLIFT INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before BELL, DYER, and CLARK, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 460
Pages: 1065–1065

Head Matter:
AIRLIFT INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 72-1435
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
June 9, 1972.
Walsh, Dolan & Krupniek, P. A., Fort Lauderdale, Fla., for appellant.
L. Patrick Gray, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., Robert W. Rust, U. S. Atty., Morton Hollander, Judith S. Feigin, Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Before BELL, DYER, and CLARK, Circuit Judges.
Rule 18, 5th Cír.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of N. Y., 431 F.2d 409, Part I (5th Cir. 1970).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The single issue raised on this appeal is whether the trial court, in a non-jury action brought to recover certain damages under an insurance contract, committed reversible error in refusing to admit certain expert testimony concerning the scope of the contract's coverage. We need not decide whether the court's ruling amounted to an abuse of discretion, for if it were, such error would be harmless in light of the remaining uncontested findings of fact and conclusions of law. Cf. Cain et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 460 F.2d 1243 (5th Cir. 1972).
Affirmed.