Case Name: Joni L. HICKS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-01-03
Citations: 572 So. 2d 1378
Docket Number: No. 75742
Parties: Joni L. HICKS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, EHRLICH, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 572
Pages: 1378–1379

Head Matter:
Joni L. HICKS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 75742.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Jan. 3, 1991.
Manuel A. Machín, Tampa, for petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Carol M. Dittmar, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for respondent.

Opinion:
BARKETT, Justice.
We have for review State v. Hicks, 558 So.2d 59 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990), in which the district court reversed the trial court's determination that section 796.01 of the Florida Statutes (1987), was unconstitutional based on State v. Warren, 558 So.2d 55 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution. In Warren v. State, 572 So.2d 1376 (Fla.1991), however, we found section 796.01 unconstitutionally vague. Therefore, we quash Hicks and remand to the district court to affirm the trial court's dismissal of the information.
It is so ordered.
SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, EHRLICH, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.