Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fernando NUNEZ-FLORES, aka Alfonso Barrutia-Gonzalez, aka Fernando Flores Nunez, aka Fernando Nunez Flores, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-03-10
Citations: 596 F. App'x 589
Docket Number: No. 13-10092
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fernando NUNEZ-FLORES, aka Alfonso Barrutia-Gonzalez, aka Fernando Flores Nunez, aka Fernando Nunez Flores, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 596
Pages: 589–590

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fernando NUNEZ-FLORES, aka Alfonso Barrutia-Gonzalez, aka Fernando Flores Nunez, aka Fernando Nunez Flores, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-10092.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 26, 2015
Filed March 10, 2015.
Christina Marie Cabanillas, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Jack L. Lansdale, Jr., Esquire, Law Offices of Jack L. Landsdale, Jr., Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2)

Opinion:
ORDER
Appellee's Unopposed Motion to Vacate Sentence and Remand for Resentencing, filed February 4, 2015, is GRANTED. The filing of this order shall serve as the court's mandate.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3