Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ismaldo Naul VALADEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-04-16
Citations: 563 F. App'x 299
Docket Number: No. 12-40964
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ismaldo Naul VALADEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before PRADO, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 563
Pages: 299–300

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ismaldo Naul VALADEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-40964
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 16, 2014.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marco Adrian Montemayor, Esq., Laredo, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Ismaldo Naul Valadez, Beaumont, TX, pro se.
Before PRADO, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Is-maldo Naul Valadez in his appeal of his revocation of supervised release and sentence has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Valadez has not filed a response.
During the pendency of this appeal, Va-ladez completed his sentence of imprisonment, and he has no further term of supervised release to serve. The appeal is, therefore, moot. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7, 118 S.Ct. 978, 140 L.Ed.2d 43 (1998); Bailey v. Southerland, 821 F.2d 277, 278 (5th Cir.1987). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED as moot, and counsel's motion to withdraw is DENIED as unnecessary.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.