Case Name: James T. BELLAMY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Donald BAUKNECHT, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-04-15
Citations: 322 F. App'x 288
Docket Number: No. 08-7875
Parties: James T. BELLAMY, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Donald BAUKNECHT, Warden, Respondent—Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 322
Pages: 288–288

Head Matter:
James T. BELLAMY, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Donald BAUKNECHT, Warden, Respondent—Appellee.
No. 08-7875.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 17, 2009.
Decided: April 15, 2009.
James T. Bellamy, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James T. Bellamy, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bellamy v. Bauknecht, No. 6:07-cv-02656-RBH, 2008 WL 2763847 (D.S.C. July 11, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.