Case Name: William SIMMONS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-11-04
Citations: 590 So. 2d 442
Docket Number: No. 90-3499
Parties: William SIMMONS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: BOOTH, WOLF and KAHN, JJ„ concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 590
Pages: 442–444

Head Matter:
William SIMMONS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 90-3499.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nov. 4, 1991.
On Motion for Rehearing or Certification Dec. 13, 1991.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Nancy L. Showalter, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Gypsy Bailey, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Simmons appeals from a judgment and sentence for two counts of sale or delivery of cocaine and two counts of possession of cocaine. He asserts on appeal that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment on acquittal on the grounds that the facts established entrapment as a matter of law in light of the holding in Cruz v. State, 465 So.2d 516 (Fla.1985), cert. denied, 473 U.S. 905, 105 S.Ct. 3527, 87 L.Ed.2d 652 (1985). We find no merit in this contention as a result of the opinion of this court in State v. Munoz, 586 So.2d 515 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).
BOOTH, WOLF and KAHN, JJ" concur.