Case Name: Kenneth Duane LEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rosie GARCIA, Warden; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-07-23
Citations: 14 F. App'x 927
Docket Number: No. 00-55853; D.C. No. CV-99-02508-JTM
Parties: Kenneth Duane LEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rosie GARCIA, Warden; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 14
Pages: 927–928

Head Matter:
Kenneth Duane LEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rosie GARCIA, Warden; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 00-55853.
D.C. No. CV-99-02508-JTM.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 9, 2001.
Decided July 23, 2001.
Before KOZINSKI, T.G. NELSON, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Kenneth Duane Lee, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's judgment dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, see Barnett v. Centoni, 31 F.3d 813, 815-16 (9th Cir.1994) (per curiam), and we affirm.
Regardless of the form of relief sought, prisoners are required to exhaust available administrative remedies prior to bringing suit in federal court. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a); Booth v. Churner, 532 U.S. 731, 121 S.Ct. 1819,1825, 149 L.Ed.2d 958 (2001). For California state prisoners, the available administrative remedies include a level of informal review and three levels of formal review for most claims. See Cal.Code Regs. tit. 15, § 3084.5. Because the record establishes that Lee only pursued his grievance through the first level of review, the district court did not err by dismissing the action without prejudice to allow Lee the opportunity to exhaust administrative remedies. See Booth, 121 S.Ct. at 1825.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.