Case Name: Charles Weining, petitioner-appellant, v. Guiseppe Sellitto and Thomas Sellitto, defendants-appellants, and Domenic Spenzierato, an infant, by his next friend, Allessandro Spenzierato, Allessandro Spenzierato and Felicia Spenzierato, defendants-respondents
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1937-04-30
Citations: 121 N.J. Eq. 613
Docket Number: 
Parties: Charles Weining, petitioner-appellant, v. Guiseppe Sellitto and Thomas Sellitto, defendants-appellants, and Domenic Spenzierato, an infant, by his next friend, Allessandro Spenzierato, Allessandro Spenzierato and Felicia Spenzierato, defendants-respondents.
Judges: For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenohard, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Eafferty, Cole, JJ. 13.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 121
Pages: 613–613

Head Matter:
Charles Weining, petitioner-appellant, v. Guiseppe Sellitto and Thomas Sellitto, defendants-appellants, and Domenic Spenzierato, an infant, by his next friend, Allessandro Spenzierato, Allessandro Spenzierato and Felicia Spenzierato, defendants-respondents.
[Submitted February term, 1937.
Decided April 30th, 1937.]
Mr. John J. Clancy, for the appellants.
Mr. Harry Fay, for the respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Our examination of the proofs taken in the court below convinces us that the order setting aside the decree pro confesso as against the infant Spenzierato, appointing a guardian and permitting an answer to be filed and awarding a counsel fee to the petitioner, was properly entered and it is therefore affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenohard, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Eafferty, Cole, JJ. 13.
For reversal — Parker, Heher, JJ. 2.