Case Name: Ignacio DIAZ-PEREZ, Petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-10-03
Citations: 658 F. App'x 330
Docket Number: No. 10-70644
Parties: Ignacio DIAZ-PEREZ, Petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: CLIFTON and BEA, Circuit Judges, and KORMAN, Senior District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 658
Pages: 330–331

Head Matter:
Ignacio DIAZ-PEREZ, Petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 10-70644
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 15, 2013 San Francisco, California
Filed October 03, 2016
Christopher John Stender, Federal Immigration Counselors, Phoenix, AZ.
Chief Counsel ICE, San Francisco, CA, OIL, Edward Earl Wiggers, Washington, DC.
Before: CLIFTON and BEA, Circuit Judges, and KORMAN, Senior District Judge.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
The Honorable Edward R. Korman, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
ORDER
Respondent's unopposed motion to vacate this Court's June 3, 2013 disposition and remand the petition to the Board of Immigration Appeals (the "Board") is granted. Petitioner's motion to vacate and remand is likewise granted. Petitioner's removal is stayed pending the Board' decision on remand.
Petitioner may file a motion to reinstate this petition within 30 days of the Board' decision. The parties have agreed to bear their own costs and fees.
Petitioner's motion for panel rehearing is denied as moot.
This order shall act as and for the mandate of the court.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.