Case Name: DANIEL ARRATE and SANDRA ARRATE, Appellants, v. NEVADA NATIONAL BANK, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada
Jurisdiction: Nevada
Decision Date: 1973-02-13
Citations: 89 Nev. 55
Docket Number: No. 6923
Parties: DANIEL ARRATE and SANDRA ARRATE, Appellants, v. NEVADA NATIONAL BANK, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Nevada Reports
Volume: 89
Pages: 55–56

Head Matter:
DANIEL ARRATE and SANDRA ARRATE, Appellants, v. NEVADA NATIONAL BANK, Respondent.
No. 6923
February 13, 1973
506 P.2d 86
[Rehearing denied March 21, 1973]
Seymour H. Pott, of Reno, for Appellants.
Guild, Hagen & Clark, Ltd., of Reno, and Jack B. Ames, of Elko, for Respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION
Per Curiam:
On February 3, 1972, respondent's counsel served appellants' counsel simultaneously with an order that granted respondent summary judgment, and with written notice of said order's entry. On February 7, 1972, appellants' counsel filed a paper titled "Motion to Reconsider Decision," which he concedes was at most a motion for rehearing under DCR 20(4), and not one of those motions which, by specific provisions of NRCP 73(a), toll the time for appeal. By order entered March 7, 1972, the court denied appellants' "Motion to Reconsider Decision," and appellants' counsel attempted to appeal this order and the court's order of February 3, through a notice of appeal filed March 23, 1972.
Since a motion for rehearing pursuant to DCR 20(4) does not toll the running of the 30-day period for filing notice of appeal, appellants' purported appeal was untimely, and therefore must be and hereby is dismissed. Whitehead v. Norman Kaye Real Estate, 80 Nev. 383, 395 P.2d 329 (1964).