Case Name: Ramiro Antonio RAMOS, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-05-13
Citations: 128 F. App'x 667
Docket Number: No. 03-74680
Parties: Ramiro Antonio RAMOS, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 128
Pages: 667–667

Head Matter:
Ramiro Antonio RAMOS, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 03-74680.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 9, 2005.
Decided May 13, 2005.
Michael S. Cabrera, Esq., Law offices of Michael S. Cabrera, Huntington Park, CA, for Petitioner.
CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Mark L. Gross, Esq., Teresa Kwong, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division/Appellate Section, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: PREGERSON, CANBY, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Alberto R. Gonzales is substituted for his predecessor, John Ashcroft, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Ramiro Antonio Ramos, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") denial of his motion to accept a late brief. We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA's denial of Ramos' motion because he filed a petition for review before a final order of removal was issued in his case. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1). Only final orders of removal are subject to review by this court. Lopez-Ruiz v. Ashcroft, 298 F.3d 886, 887 (9th Cir.2002) (order).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.