Case Name: Roy NEIMARK, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Gaye ABOWITZ, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-05-23
Citations: 23 S.W.3d 670
Docket Number: No. ED 76940
Parties: Roy NEIMARK, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Gaye ABOWITZ, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANE, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, J., and SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 23
Pages: 670–671

Head Matter:
Roy NEIMARK, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Gaye ABOWITZ, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 76940.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
May 23, 2000.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 17, 2000.
Application for Transfer Denied Aug. 29, 2000.
Jonathan D. Marks, Clayton, for appellant.
Susan M. Hais, Hais & Carmody, Clayton, for respondent.
Before CRANE, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, J., and SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Roy Neimark ("Husband") appeals from a trial court Judgment and Decree of Dissolution of Marriage ordering Husband to pay Gaye Abowitz ("Wife") continuing, modifiable maintenance in the amount of $500 per month. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's judgment is not unsupported by substantial evidence, against the weight of the evidence, nor does it erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).