Case Name: John O. BLAKE, Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-09-16
Citations: 120 S.W.3d 759
Docket Number: No. ED 82289
Parties: John O. BLAKE, Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Respondent.
Judges: Before GARYM. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J. and MARY R. RUSSELL, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 120
Pages: 759–760

Head Matter:
John O. BLAKE, Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Respondent.
No. ED 82289.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Sept. 16, 2003.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 13, 2003.
Application for Transfer Denied Dec. 23, 2003.
Elkin L. Kistner, Jones, Haywood, Bick, Kistner, & Jones, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Mark Lawson, Office of the City Counselor, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.
Before GARYM. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J. and MARY R. RUSSELL, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, John 0. Blake ("Blake"), appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis granting summary judgment in favor of respondent, the City of St. Louis ("the City"). Blake argues that a genuine issue of material fact exists as to whether Blake intended to waive his claim by paying the late penalties and also that the City lacked legal authority to impose the late penalties. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).