Case Name: PERKINS & STREET v. PATRICK
Court: Supreme Court of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1873
Citations: 45 Cal. 393
Docket Number: No. 3,567
Parties: PERKINS & STREET v. PATRICK.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Reports
Volume: 45
Pages: 393–393

Head Matter:
[No. 3,567.]
PERKINS & STREET v. PATRICK.
Frivolous Appeal.—In. an action on a promissory note the plaintiffs proved all the issues, and had judgment, from which the defendant appealed. There being no error in the record, judgment affirmed, with damages.
Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, County of San Joaquin.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
Byers Elliott, for Appellant.
E, S. Pillsbury, for Respondents.

Opinion:
By the Court:
The action is on a promissory note against the makers, and the names of the plaintiffs, as stated in the complaint, are "- Perkins & - Street," who are described as partners, " doing business under the firm name of Perkins & Street.". The note was payable to one Cassidy, and came to the plaintiffs by regular indorsements from the payee. The answer denies, first, that the plaintiffs are partners under the firm name of Perkins & Street; second, that the note was indorsed and delivered to the plaintiffs; third, that the plaintiffs are the owners and holders of the note. These were the only issues in the cause, and at the trial were fully proved in favor of the plaintiffs. Judgment having been rendered for the plaintiffs, the defendant appeals.
We discover no error in the record, and consider the appeal as frivolous.
Judgment affirmed, with twenty per cent damages. Remittitur to issue forthwith.