Case Name: Santa MARCO and Ernest Marco, Her Husband, and Catherine Fusco and Salvatore Fusco, Her Husband, Appellants, v. Francis J. PERRY, Jr. and Francis J. Perry, Sr.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1965-11-12
Citations: 351 F.2d 953
Docket Number: No. 15138
Parties: Santa MARCO and Ernest Marco, Her Husband, and Catherine Fusco and Salvatore Fusco, Her Husband, Appellants, v. Francis J. PERRY, Jr. and Francis J. Perry, Sr.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 351
Pages: 953–953

Head Matter:
Santa MARCO and Ernest Marco, Her Husband, and Catherine Fusco and Salvatore Fusco, Her Husband, Appellants, v. Francis J. PERRY, Jr. and Francis J. Perry, Sr.
No. 15138.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued Sept. 17, 1965.
Decided Nov. 12, 1965.
John F. Dougherty, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa. (Beilis, Kolsby & Poplow, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.
William S. Zink, Camden, N. J. (Bleakly, Stoekwell & Zink, Camden, N. J., on the brief), for appellee Francis J. Perry, Jr.
Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and MARIS and KALODNER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This case arises out of a collision between motor vehicles and the only substantial questions presented are whether or not the verdicts were contrary to the weight of the evidence or to the law. We. are convinced that they were not. Though the amounts of damages allowed to the plaintiffs are asserted to be inadequate and- to represent compromises by the jury, we are not convinced of this. Consequently, the judgments will be affirmed.