Case Name: Moe Birnbaum, Respondent, v. Leo Katz et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1959-05-26
Citations: 18 Misc. 2d 243
Docket Number: 
Parties: Moe Birnbaum, Respondent, v. Leo Katz et al., Appellants.
Judges: Concur — Pettb, Hart and Brown, JJ.
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 18
Pages: 243–244

Head Matter:
Moe Birnbaum, Respondent, v. Leo Katz et al., Appellants.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
May 26, 1959.
Peter Rosenberg for appellants.
Mildred B. Lesser for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The order of March 13, 1959 should be affirmed, with $10 costs. No opinion.
The order of March 16, 1959 should be unanimously reversed on the law, with $10 costs to the defendant Katz and the matter remitted to the Municipal Court to determine on oral proof whether defendant-appellant was served with process.
Defendant-appellant is entitled to a hearing to determine whether he was served with process.
Concur — Pettb, Hart and Brown, JJ.
Order affirmed, etc.