Case Name: Stanton Larry HAMER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-11-19
Citations: 682 So. 2d 1221
Docket Number: No. 95-3305
Parties: Stanton Larry HAMER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ALLEN, MICKLE and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 682
Pages: 1221–1221

Head Matter:
Stanton Larry HAMER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 95-3305.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nov. 19, 1996.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Terry Carley, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Vincent Altieri, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Stanton Larry Hamer (Hamer) appeals the sentence imposed following the revocation of his probation. We affirm the revocation of his probation and sentence imposed thereon, but remand for correction of certain errors in the written order of revocation.
First, the trial court erred in failing to conform its written sentencing order to its oral pronouncement at the sentencing hearing. Eidson v. State, 667 So.2d 247 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). The trial court orally sentenced Hamer to six years imprisonment with credit for jail time, as well as credit for all time previously served and unforfeited gain time. When the written order issued, however, it made no mention of credit for gain time or for time previously served in prison. We remand with directions to correct the written revocation order to reflect the sentence orally pronounced.
Second, the written order contains an apparent scrivener's error regarding the amount of restitution left unpaid. The order indicates the restitution obligation is $24,-094.43, while the civil judgment filed against Hamer lists the balance as $23,998.43, an amount supported by the record. On remand, the written order must be corrected to reflect such amount.
Hamer's arguments pertaining to various scoresheet errors have not been, preserved for appellate review. See Taylor v. State, 601 So.2d 540 (Fla.1992)(sentencing errors requiring resolution of factual matters not contained in record cannot generally be raised for first time on appeal).
Accordingly, we affirm Hamer's sentence in all respects, but remand the written revocation order with directions to amend it consistent with this opinion.
AFFIRMED and REMANDED, with directions.
ALLEN, MICKLE and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.
. This case is controlled by State v. Green, 547 So.2d 925 (Fla.1989).