Case Name: Coe Ten Eyck, Pl'ff, v. Town of Warwick et al., Def'ts
Court: New York Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1894-08
Citations: 63 N.Y. St. Rep. 165
Docket Number: 
Parties: Coe Ten Eyck, Pl’ff, v. Town of Warwick et al., Def’ts.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 63
Pages: 165–166

Head Matter:
Coe Ten Eyck, Pl’ff, v. Town of Warwick et al., Def’ts.
(Supreme Court, Kings Special Term,
Filed August, 1894.)
Stay of proceedings—Non-payment op costs.
A motion by the plaintiff for leave to enter final judgment, dismissing the complaint, after an order sustaining a demurrer thereto has been affirmed on appeal, will be granted, though costs of previous proceedings have not been paid.
Motion for leave to enter final judgment dismissing the complaint.
Clarence C. Ferris, for pl’ff; Henry Bacon and Bacon & Merritt, for def’t town of Warwick.

Opinion:
Bartlett, J.
This is an application on behalf of the plaintiff for leave to enter final judgment dismissing the complaint, which judgment the defendant the town of Warwick is entitled to enter, but declines to enter. The application is o" nosed on the ground that the plaintiff is in default for the nonpayment of costs heretofore awarded against him in the action ; that defendant relying upon § 779 of the Code, which provides that, where costs are not paid within the time fixed for that purpose, all proceedings on the part of the party required to pay the same, except to review or vacate the order" are stayed, without further direction of the court, until the payment thereof. I think it would be a forced construction of this section to hold that it operates to prevent a litigant from taking steps to compel his adversary to place upon the record of the court in an effective manner a judgment in favor of that adversary and against the applicant. The section could never have been intended to prevent a party from insisting upon the entry of a judgment against himself. It may-very well be that after the entry of such a judgment in favor of the town of Warwick in the present action § 779 will have the effect of staying all proceedings on the part of the plaintiff to review that judgment until the motion costs heretofore awarded tb the defendant shall be paid, but that will be a matter for future consideration. The plaintiff may have leave to enter final judgment herein in accordanee with the directions of the interlocutory judgment, unless such judgment is entered by the defendant within ten days after service of notice of the entry of the order to be made upon this motion.