Case Name: Alexander M. Schwob, Respondent, v. Henrietta V. Goodwin and Henry H. Goodwin, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1916-12
Citations: 176 A.D. 885
Docket Number: 
Parties: Alexander M. Schwob, Respondent, v. Henrietta V. Goodwin and Henry H. Goodwin, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 176
Pages: 885–885

Head Matter:
Alexander M. Schwob, Respondent, v. Henrietta V. Goodwin and Henry H. Goodwin, Appellants.

Opinion:
As the case now stands it is controlled by the ' ' second ' clause of the written contract between Schwob and Goodwin. That clause is clear and apparently free from ambiguity. The trial court erred in its interpretation. The "fifth" and " sixth " findings of fact, and the "first," "second" and "third" conclusions of law are reversed. The judgment is reversed, with costs of this appeal to the appellants, and a new trial is granted, costs to abide the final award of costs. Thomas, Carr, Stapleton, Mills and Putnam, JJ., concurred.