Case Name: Mabel Shackleford PATTERSON, Petitioner, v. STEVENS MARKET #1 et al., Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1965-03-10
Citations: 172 So. 2d 583
Docket Number: No. 33825
Parties: Mabel Shackleford PATTERSON, Petitioner, v. STEVENS MARKET #1 et al., Respondents.
Judges: DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORN AL and ERVIN, JJ., con-c-ttr.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 172
Pages: 583–584

Head Matter:
Mabel Shackleford PATTERSON, Petitioner, v. STEVENS MARKET #1 et al., Respondents.
No. 33825.
Supreme Court of Florida.
March 10, 1965.
Charles F. Lindsay, Miami, for petitioner.
Welsh, Cornell, Pyszka & Carlton, Charles T. Kessler, Miami, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date September 8, 1964.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORN AL and ERVIN, JJ., con-c-ttr.