Case Name: In the Matter of: Alexis Mager LAKUSTA, Debtor, Alexis Mager Lakusta, Appellant, v. Mark H. Evans; Sharon La Fountain; Alvin C. Silbernagel, Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-06-05
Citations: 328 F. App'x 385
Docket Number: No. 07-16596
Parties: In the Matter of: Alexis Mager LAKUSTA, Debtor, Alexis Mager Lakusta, Appellant, v. Mark H. Evans; Sharon La Fountain; Alvin C. Silbernagel, Appellees.
Judges: Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, BROWNING and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Bankruptcy Reporter
Volume: 413
Pages: 385–386

Head Matter:
In the Matter of: Alexis Mager LAKUSTA, Debtor, Alexis Mager Lakusta, Appellant, v. Mark H. Evans; Sharon La Fountain; Alvin C. Silbernagel, Appellees.
No. 07-16596.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 12, 2009.
Filed June 5, 2009.
Alexis Mager Lakusta, Menlo Park, CA, pro se.
Mark H. Evans, Saratoga, CA, pro se.
Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, BROWNING and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
The bankruptcy court's order declared Lakusta a vexatious litigant and enjoined him from further filings barred by collateral estoppel. We affirm that order because the bankruptcy court met all the procedural requirements set forth in De Long v. Hennessey, 912 F.2d 1144, 1146 (9th Cir.1990).
We deny Lakusta's pending motions requesting additional time to object to Evans' request for sanctions, and we deny Evans' request for sanctions. We decline at this time to impose pre-filing restrictions on Lakusta with regard to future appeals. See Moy v. United States, 906 F.2d 467, 470 (9th Cir.1990). We are concerned, however, that all three appeals Lakusta filed with this court were dismissed for failure to prosecute, and two were reinstated only after numerous unexplained delays. Thus, further appeals may be deemed frivolous and subject to monetary sanctions under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.