Case Name: Bhima Sturtevant v. James M. Sturtevant
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1961-10-31
Citations: 149 Conn. 727
Docket Number: 
Parties: Bhima Sturtevant v. James M. Sturtevant
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 149
Pages: 727–727

Head Matter:
Bhima Sturtevant v. James M. Sturtevant
Baldwin, C. J., King, Murphy, Alcorn and MacDonald, Js.
Argued October 5
decided October 31, 1961
Joseph E. Mouhawsher, with whom, on the brief, was Griswold Morgan, for the appellant (defendant).
Donald O’Brien, for the appellee (plaintiff).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This appeal is from the judgment rendered on a retrial of this case as the result of our reversal of an earlier judgment. See Sturtevant v. Sturtevant, 146 Conn. 644, 153 A.2d 828. The attempt in the present appeal is to reargue the intent of the parties as expressed in the separation agreement between them. That intent was a principal subject of our prior decision. The trial court correctly determined the defendant's net income in accordance with our conclusion in that decision.
There is no error.