Case Name: Geralyn PHILLIPS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NATIONAL CITY BANK OF INDIANA FIRST FRANKLIN DIVISION; National City Home Loan Services Incorporated; First Franklin Financial Corporation; Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Incorporated; Does 1-1000, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-12-19
Citations: 462 F. App'x 666
Docket Number: No. 10-17365
Parties: Geralyn PHILLIPS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NATIONAL CITY BANK OF INDIANA FIRST FRANKLIN DIVISION; National City Home Loan Services Incorporated; First Franklin Financial Corporation; Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Incorporated; Does 1-1000, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: THOMAS and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges, and CARR, Senior District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 462
Pages: 666–666

Head Matter:
Geralyn PHILLIPS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NATIONAL CITY BANK OF INDIANA FIRST FRANKLIN DIVISION; National City Home Loan Services Incorporated; First Franklin Financial Corporation; Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Incorporated; Does 1-1000, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 10-17365.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 30, 2011.
Filed Dec. 19, 2011.
Beth Findsen, Esquire, Johnson, Find-sen & Kinney, PLLC, Scottsdale, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Gregory B. Iannelli, Robert W. Shely, I, Litigation Counsel, Bryan Cave LLP, James R. Condo, Esquire, Snell & Wilmer L.L.P., Phoenix, AZ, Robert M. Brochin, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Miami, FL, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: THOMAS and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges, and CARR, Senior District Judge.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
The Honorable James G. Carr, Senior District Judge for the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Geralyn Phillips appeals the district court's dismissal of her action against National City Bank, First Franklin Financial Corporation, Home Loan Services, and the Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.. We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
AFFIRMED.
fjjjg disposition is not appropriate for publication and except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
. Appellant's Motion for Judicial Notice, filed January 25, 2011, asking us to take notice of opinions cited in Appellant's Opening Brief, is denied as unnecessary. Judicial notice customarily entails matter of fact. Judicial notice is not required for the court to consider the cited opinions as matters of law and potentially persuasive precedents.