Case Name: Steven E. TARPLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. Michael STOUFFER; Bobby P. Shearin; Maryland Dept. of Public Safety; John Sandstrom; Scott Oakley; Correctional Services, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-11-20
Citations: 585 F. App'x 219
Docket Number: No. 14-6865
Parties: Steven E. TARPLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. Michael STOUFFER; Bobby P. Shearin; Maryland Dept. of Public Safety; John Sandstrom; Scott Oakley; Correctional Services, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 585
Pages: 219–220

Head Matter:
Steven E. TARPLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. Michael STOUFFER; Bobby P. Shearin; Maryland Dept. of Public Safety; John Sandstrom; Scott Oakley; Correctional Services, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 14-6865.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 18, 2014.
Decided: Nov. 20, 2014.
Steven E. Tarpley, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Steven E. Tarpley appeals the district court's order denying his motion to reconsider a prior order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tarpley v. Stouffer, No. 1:13-cv-00522-GLR (D.Md. May 21, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.