Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ryan Randolph, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2014-11-20
Citations: 122 A.D.3d 522
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ryan Randolph, Appellant.
Judges: Concur— Renwick, J.E, Saxe, Moskowitz, DeGrasse and Richter, JJ.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 122
Pages: 522–523

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ryan Randolph, Appellant.
[996 NYS2d 278]

Opinion:
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bonnie G. Wittner, J.), rendered December 1, 2009, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of 15 years, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly granted the People's application to preclude defendant from cross-examining a witness about an arrest, because the mere fact of an arrest is not a permitted area for impeachment (People v Miller, 91 NY2d 372, 380 [1998]). Moreover, defense counsel expressly acquiesced in that ruling, disclaiming any desire to inquire about a mere arrest. While defendant presently asserts that the court also precluded inquiry into the witness's purported guilty plea, the court made no such ruling. On the contrary, both sides agreed that no record of a conviction existed.
We have considered and rejected defendant's ineffective assistance of counsel claim (see People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 713-714 [1998]; Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668 [1984]), as well as his pro se arguments.
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.
Concur— Renwick, J.E, Saxe, Moskowitz, DeGrasse and Richter, JJ.