Case Name: Citibank, N. A., Respondent, v. Saratoga Condominium et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1994-03-14
Citations: 202 A.D.2d 465
Docket Number: 
Parties: Citibank, N. A., Respondent, v Saratoga Condominium et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 202
Pages: 465–466

Head Matter:
Citibank, N. A., Respondent, v Saratoga Condominium et al., Appellants.
[610 NYS2d 796]

Opinion:
—In an action, inter alia, for a declaration that the defendants possess no claim or lien for common charges against an apartment unit located in the codefendant Saratoga Condominium, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Burrows, J.), dated March 13, 1992, as granted the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and extinguished their alleged lien for common charges.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment to the plaintiff Citibank, N. A., declaring, inter alia, that the defendants have no lien or claim for common charges against a certain apartment unit located in the Saratoga Condominium (see, Bankers Trust Co. v Board of Mgrs., 81 NY2d 1033, 1034; see also, Real Property Law § 339-z, 339-aa; CPLR 6501; 7A Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac f 6501.13). Thompson, J. P., Santucci, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.