Case Name: In the Interest of M.D., B.D.A.D. and R.R.J.D., Plaintiff; Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. A.R.L. (Mother), Appellant; G.A.D. (Father), Defendant; J.M. and J.M., Defendants
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-01-18
Citations: 65 S.W.3d 559
Docket Number: No. WD 60043
Parties: In the Interest of M.D., B.D.A.D. and R.R.J.D., Plaintiff; Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. A.R.L. (Mother), Appellant; G.A.D. (Father), Defendant; J.M. and J.M., Defendants.
Judges: Before: HOLLIGER, P.J., ULRICH and HARDWICK, J.J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 65
Pages: 559–560

Head Matter:
In the Interest of M.D., B.D.A.D. and R.R.J.D., Plaintiff; Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. A.R.L. (Mother), Appellant; G.A.D. (Father), Defendant; J.M. and J.M., Defendants.
No. WD 60043.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jan. 18, 2002.
Bryan C. Breckenridge, Nevada, MO, Attorney and Guardian for M.D., B.D.A.D. and R.R.J.D.
Lynn Moore Ewing, III, for Respondent.
Before: HOLLIGER, P.J., ULRICH and HARDWICK, J.J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
A.R.L., the natural mother, appeals the trial court's decision to terminate her parental rights to three minor children. She challenges the sufficiency of the evidence and the lack of specific findings to support the termination decision. We affirm the trial court's judgment. Rule 84.16(b).