Case Name: Laron CRENSHAW, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2016-12-27
Citations: 506 S.W.3d 393
Docket Number: ED104103
Parties: Laron CRENSHAW, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Mary K Hoff, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 506
Pages: 393–393

Head Matter:
Laron CRENSHAW, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
ED104103
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Filed: December 27, 2016
Lisa M. Stroup, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Evan J. Buchheim, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Mary K Hoff, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Laron Crenshaw appeals from a denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).