Case Name: Ex parte DOUGLAS R. BROOME and OLLIE B. BROOME, Petitioners-Respondents, v. JAMES T. BROOME, Respondent-Appellant; In Re JAMES T. BROOME, Plaintiff, v. DOUGLAS R. BROOME and OLLIE B. BROOME each individually and d/b/a Doug Brome's Drive-In, Defendants
Court: Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jurisdiction: South Carolina
Decision Date: 1956-09-24
Citations: 230 S.C. 155
Docket Number: 17207
Parties: Ex parte DOUGLAS R. BROOME and OLLIE B. BROOME, Petitioners-Respondents, v. JAMES T. BROOME, Respondent-Appellant. In Re JAMES T. BROOME, Plaintiff, v. DOUGLAS R. BROOME and OLLIE B. BROOME each individually and d/b/a Doug Brome’s Drive-In, Defendants
Judges: 
Reporter: South Carolina Reports
Volume: 230
Pages: 155–159

Head Matter:
17207
Ex parte DOUGLAS R. BROOME and OLLIE B. BROOME, Petitioners-Respondents, v. JAMES T. BROOME, Respondent-Appellant. In Re JAMES T. BROOME, Plaintiff, v. DOUGLAS R. BROOME and OLLIE B. BROOME each individually and d/b/a Doug Brome’s Drive-In, Defendants
(94 S. E. (2d) 439)
Chas. F. Cooper, Esq., of Columbia, for Respondent-Appellant,
Messrs. Baker & Baker, of Columbia, for Respondents,
September 24, 1956.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The Order of Honorable G. Badger Baker has been carefully considered in the light of the record and the exceptions, and we find no error.
Let the Order be reported as the judgment of this Court.