Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jesse KLUMPP, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-04-04
Citations: 187 S.W.3d 887
Docket Number: No. ED 86284
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jesse KLUMPP, Appellant.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 187
Pages: 887–888

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jesse KLUMPP, Appellant.
No. ED 86284.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
April 4, 2006.
Jesse Klumpp, Jefferson City, pro se.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Daniel N. McPherson, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Jesse Klumpp ("Movant"), appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Charles County overruling his second Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief ("Motion"). Following a jury trial, Movant was convicted of eight counts of sodomy, section 566.060.3, RSMo (Supp. 1993). Movant was sentenced to four terms of life imprisonment and four terms of forty years of imprisonment, with the sentences to run consecutively. Movant's convictions and sentences, and the denial of his first Rule 29.15 motion for post- conviction relief were affirmed in State v. Klumpp, 945 S.W.2d 618 (Mo.App. E.D. 1997). We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.