Case Name: Prosper BRIFIEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2006-02-22
Citations: 920 So. 2d 1224
Docket Number: No. 4D05-4210
Parties: Prosper BRIFIEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: WARNER, POLEN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 920
Pages: 1224–1224

Head Matter:
Prosper BRIFIEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D05-4210.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb. 22, 2006.
David M. Lamos of Law Offices of David M. Lamos, Fort Pierce, for appellant.
No appearance required for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court's denial of appellant's motions for relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, because they were impermissibly filed beyond the two-year time limitation. However, as it appears the trial court has never ruled on appellant's supplemental motion filed March 16, 2004, our affir-mance is without prejudice to obtaining a ruling on the supplemental motion.
Affirmed.
WARNER, POLEN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.