Case Name: William F. Mullin, appellant, v. Emma L. Vogt et al., respondents
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1915-01-27
Citations: 84 N.J. Eq. 204
Docket Number: 
Parties: William F. Mullin, appellant, v. Emma L. Vogt et al., respondents.
Judges: For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Bogert, Vredenburgh, White, Terhune, Heppenheimer, Williams — 15.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 84
Pages: 204–204

Head Matter:
William F. Mullin, appellant, v. Emma L. Vogt et al., respondents.
[Submitted December 7th, 1914.
Decided January 27th, 1915.]
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Stevens, whose opinion is reported in 82 N. J. Eq. 450.
Mr. Ralph E. Lum, for the appellant.
Mr: Joseph Kahrs, for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion tiled in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Stevens.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Bogert, Vredenburgh, White, Terhune, Heppenheimer, Williams — 15.
For reversal — None.