Case Name: Josephine DUBINS and Tamara Swali, Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1982-03-16
Citations: 410 So. 2d 999
Docket Number: Nos. 81-168, 81-327
Parties: Josephine DUBINS and Tamara Swali, Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 410
Pages: 999–1000

Head Matter:
Josephine DUBINS and Tamara Swali, Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Nos. 81-168, 81-327.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 16, 1982.
Bennett Brummer, Public Defender and Barry Weinstein, Asst. Public Defender, for appellants.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Alan T. Lip-son, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Finding that the phrase "competence to consent to treatment" in Section 394.-467(3)(a), Florida Statutes (Supp.1980), is not unconstitutionally vague, indefinite, uncertain or standardless so as to violate the due process clauses of the Constitutions of the United States and the State of Florida, and that no procedural due process right of either appellant was violated by the hearings conducted, we affirm the orders under review in these consolidated appeals.
Affirmed.