Case Name: In re Application of Stineman
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1990-06-27
Citations: 52 Ohio St. 3d 88
Docket Number: No. 89-1979
Parties: In re Application of Stineman.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Stephenson, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 52
Pages: 88–89

Head Matter:
In re Application of Stineman.
[Cite as In re Application of Stineman (1990), 52 Ohio St. 3d 88.]
(No. 89-1979
Submitted March 13, 1990
Decided June 27, 1990.)
Clark & Eyrich and Stephen T. MacConnell, for applicant.
Michael M. Schmieg, for the Cincinnati Bar Association.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We agree with the board's findings and its recommendation. Accordingly, applicant's application for admission without examination is hereby denied. However, applicant is permitted to reapply for admission. He shall undergo further character and fitness examination and, if approved, be required to take the Ohio bar examination.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Stephenson, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Earl E. Stephenson, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting for Wright, J.