Case Name: James L. SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1986-12-24
Citations: 510 So. 2d 310
Docket Number: No. 84-2006
Parties: James L. SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 510
Pages: 310–310

Head Matter:
James L. SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 84-2006.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Dec. 24, 1986.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Tatjana Ostapoff, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Michael W. Baker and Joan Fowler Rossin, Asst. Attys. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
OPINION ON REMAND
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. We believe the state has demonstrated that the error in receiving testimony concerning appellant's constitutional right to remain silent was harmless under the test set out in State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).
ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN, JJ., concur.