Case Name: Richard Thesing, plaintiff, v. School District No. 57, of York County, Nebraska, defendant
Court: Nebraska Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Nebraska
Decision Date: 1884-01
Citations: 16 Neb. 134
Docket Number: 
Parties: Richard Thesing, plaintiff, v. School District No. 57, of York County, Nebraska, defendant.
Judges: The other judges concur.
Reporter: Nebraska Reports
Volume: 16
Pages: 134–135

Head Matter:
Richard Thesing, plaintiff, v. School District No. 57, of York County, Nebraska, defendant.
1. Practice: bill op exceptions. Where evidence has been introduced in the court below, which is not properly a matter of record, a party who wishes to avail himself of it in the supreme court must preserve the same by a bill of exceptions. Ray v. Mason, ,6 Neb., 101.
2. Judgment: presumption in favor of. It is a settled rule op law that] every presumption is in favor of the correctness of a judgment of a court of general jurisdiction until the contrary is made affirmatively to appear. Credit Fonder v. Rogers, 10 Neb., 184.
Error to the district court for York county. Tried below before George W. Post, J.
Hale & Conner, for plaintiff in error.
Sedgwick & Power, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
Reese, J.
The plaintiff filed his petition in the district court of York county praying an order of injunction against the defendant restraining it from allowing a school house in the district of which the plaintiff is a resident and tax payer to be used on Sunday as a place of public worship. A temporary injunction was allowed by the county court. An answer was filed admitting the use of, but denying the injury to the school house and alleging that the plaintiff is and for a long time has been director of said district, and that the use of the school house was at his solicitation and by his consent. No reply was filed. A motion was made by the defendant to vacate the injunction. Due notice was given of the time and place of hearing this motion. A number of affidavits were used on the hearing. None of them are presented by bill of exceptions. This was necessary. They cannot be considered in this court unless so preserved. Aultman v. Howe, 10 Neb., 10. Oliver v. Sheeley, 11 Neb., 521.
Upon trial the cause was dismissed. No bill of exceptions is presented to this court.
It is well settled that every presumption is in favor of the correctness of a judgment until the contrary is made affirmatively to appear. Credit Fonder of America v. Rogers, 10 Neb., 184.
The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
The other judges concur.