Case Name: SCHERING CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PERRIGO COMPANY and L. Perrigo Company, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-11-20
Citations: 83 F. App'x 319
Docket Number: No. 03-1029
Parties: SCHERING CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PERRIGO COMPANY and L. Perrigo Company, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 83
Pages: 319–320

Head Matter:
SCHERING CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PERRIGO COMPANY and L. Perrigo Company, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 03-1029.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Nov. 20, 2003.
Before NEWMAN, MICHEL, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ON MOTION
NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
ORDER
Perrigo Company and L. Perrigo Company move to lift the stay of the briefing schedule in 03-1029 and enter judgment, based on our recent decision in Schering Corp. v. Geneva Pharmaceuticals, 02-1540 et al., and to consolidate this case with those previously decided appeals. Perrigo states that Schering Corporation does not oppose.
Perrigo's motions to lift the stay and enter judgment are proper, based on the earlier disposition. However, we note that the mandate has issued in the previously decided appeals, 02-1540 et al. Thus, consolidation with those appeals is inappropriate.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) The motion to enter judgment is granted. The district court's judgment is affirmed.
(2) The motion to consolidate is denied.