Case Name: Raymond Harris et al., Respondents, v. Lord Electric Company, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Port of New York Authority, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant; City of New York et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1952-12-15
Citations: 281 A.D. 693
Docket Number: 
Parties: Raymond Harris et al., Respondents, v. Lord Electric Company, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Port of New York Authority, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant; City of New York et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 281
Pages: 693–693

Head Matter:
Raymond Harris et al., Respondents, v. Lord Electric Company, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Port of New York Authority, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant; City of New York et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents.

Opinion:
The plaintiffs suffered injuries on July 28, 1950, because of an explosion of gases in a manhole at the New York International Airport. Their action to recover damages is against the Lord Electric Company, Inc., which constructed the manhole. On May 5, 1952, the Lord Company served a third-party summons and complaint on the Port of New York Authority, alleging that the Authority's active negligence caused the injuries, and claiming that the action lies under the joint enactment oil the Legislatures of the States of New York and New Jersey, which waives the Authority's sovereign immunity to suit and which became effective June 13, 1951. (L. 1950, eh. 301; N. J. L. 1951, eh. 204.) The Port Authority appeared specially and moved to set aside the process on the ground that it appears on the face of the third-party complaint that the court is without jurisdiction of the person or the subject, matter. The motion was denied on the ground that the action for indemnity will not accrue until the Lord Company is h ;ld liable at the suit of the plaintiffs, and that the said action is not upon, in connection with, or arising out of a contract, expressed or implied. Order reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, without costs. The statute involved is prospective in effect. (Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. United States, 175 F. 2d 490, certiorari denied 338 U. S. 899; Terminal R. Assn. of St. Louis v. United States, 182 F. 2d 149, certiorari denied 340 U. S. 825.) Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, MacCrate and Schmidt, JJ., concur.