Case Name: NSK Ltd. and NSK Corporation; NTN Corporation, NTN Bearing Corporation of America, American NTN Bearing Manufacturing Corporation, NTN Driveshaft, Inc. and NTN-Bower Corporation; and Timken U.S. Corporation, Plaintiffs and Defendant-Intervenors, v. United States, Defendant, and Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. and Koyo Corporations of U.S.A.; and Nachi-Fujikoshi Corp., Nachi America, Inc. and Nachi Technology, Inc., Defendant-Intervenors
Court: United States Court of International Trade
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005
Citations: 29 Ct. Int'l Trade 647
Docket Number: Consol. Court No. 98-07-02527
Parties: NSK Ltd. and NSK Corporation; NTN Corporation, NTN Bearing Corporation of America, American NTN Bearing Manufacturing Corporation, NTN Driveshaft, Inc. and NTN-Bower Corporation; and Timken U.S. Corporation, Plaintiffs and Defendant-Intervenors, v. United States, Defendant, and Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. and Koyo Corporations of U.S.A.; and Nachi-Fujikoshi Corp., Nachi America, Inc. and Nachi Technology, Inc., Defendant-Intervenors.
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Court of International Trade Reports
Volume: 29
Pages: 647–648

Head Matter:
NSK Ltd. and NSK Corporation; NTN Corporation, NTN Bearing Corporation of America, American NTN Bearing Manufacturing Corporation, NTN Driveshaft, Inc. and NTN-Bower Corporation; and Timken U.S. Corporation, Plaintiffs and Defendant-Intervenors, v. United States, Defendant, and Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. and Koyo Corporations of U.S.A.; and Nachi-Fujikoshi Corp., Nachi America, Inc. and Nachi Technology, Inc., Defendant-Intervenors.
Consol. Court No. 98-07-02527

Opinion:
JUDGMENT
TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge:
This Court having received and reviewed the United States Department of Commerce's Remand Deter mination in NSK Ltd. v. United States, 29 CIT_, 2005 Ct. Int'l Trade LEXIS 28 (February 18, 2005), responses of NSK Ltd. and NSK Corporation, Plaintiffs and Defendant-Intervenors, and Commerce's rebuttal comments finds that Commerce duly complied with the Court's remand order and it is hereby,
ORDERED that the Remand Determination filed by Commerce on May 18, 2005, is affirmed in its entirety, and it is further
ORDERED that since all other issues have been decided, this case is DISMISSED.