Case Name: Ellen O. KNOX and John J. Knox, Jr., Respondents/Cross-Appellants, v. John A. HARTWIG, Jr., Appellant/Cross-Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-09-26
Citations: 906 S.W.2d 905
Docket Number: No. 65906
Parties: Ellen O. KNOX and John J. Knox, Jr., Respondents/Cross-Appellants, v. John A. HARTWIG, Jr., Appellant/Cross-Respondent.
Judges: Before AHRENS, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GRIMM, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 906
Pages: 905–906

Head Matter:
Ellen O. KNOX and John J. Knox, Jr., Respondents/Cross-Appellants, v. John A. HARTWIG, Jr., Appellant/Cross-Respondent.
No. 65906.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Sept. 26, 1995.
James E. Dealing, Dealing & Hartzog, Clayton, for appellants.
Richard J. Magee, Daniel J. McAuliffe, Clayton, for respondent.
Before AHRENS, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GRIMM, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Both petitioners, Ellen 0. Knox and John J. Knox, Jr., and respondent, John A. Hart-wig, Jr., appeal the judgment of the trial court on objections to the final settlement in the estate of Ann Knickmeyer, deceased.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).