Case Name: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McMahon
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1992-09-02
Citations: 64 Ohio St. 3d 460
Docket Number: No. 92-419
Parties: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McMahon.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 64
Pages: 460–462

Head Matter:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McMahon.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. McMahon (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 460.]
(No. 92-419
Submitted April 15, 1992
Decided September 2, 1992.)
J. Warren Bettis, Disciplinary Counsel, and Sally Ann Steuk, for relator.
Thomas Paul McMahon, pro se.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We agree that respondent violated the Disciplinary Rules, as found by the board. We also concur with the board's recommendation. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.