Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Vera PALMER, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-09-02
Citations: 113 S.W.3d 692
Docket Number: No. ED 81121
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Vera PALMER, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL JR., J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 113
Pages: 692–693

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Vera PALMER, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 81121.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Sept. 2, 2003.
Mary S. Choi, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Patrick T. Morgan, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL JR., J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant, Vera Palmer, appeals from her convictions for first-degree murder in violation of section 565.020.1, RSMo 2000, and armed criminal action in violation of section 571.015, RSMo 2000. She challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support her convictions.
Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we find no error of law or otherwise. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 80.25(b).