Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. John BOYD, Appellant; John BOYD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-04-25
Citations: 896 S.W.2d 544
Docket Number: Nos. 63343, 66105
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. John BOYD, Appellant. John BOYD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANE, P.J., and CRANDALL and DOWD, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 896
Pages: 544–545

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. John BOYD, Appellant. John BOYD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 63343, 66105.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
April 25, 1995.
Ellen H. Flottman, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Becky Owenson Kilpatrick, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before CRANE, P.J., and CRANDALL and DOWD, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant, John Boyd, appeals after a jury convicted him of first degree murder, § 565.020, RSMo Cum.Supp.1994, and armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo 1986. Consolidated -within this direct appeal, Defendant also appeals denial of Rule 29.15 relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
We find no error of law appears, and the findings of fact of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 84.16(b). Further, we find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion and affirm by written summary order. Rule 30.25(b). A memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision has been issued to the parties for their use only.