Case Name: Bennie Maniscalco, Plaintiff in Error, v. State of Florida, Defendant in Error
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1929-09-25
Citations: 98 Fla. 468
Docket Number: 
Parties: Bennie Maniscalco, Plaintiff in Error, v. State of Florida, Defendant in Error.
Judges: Terreli,, C. J., and Ellis, J., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 98
Pages: 468–469

Head Matter:
Bennie Maniscalco, Plaintiff in Error, v. State of Florida, Defendant in Error.
Dmsion A.
Opinion filed September 25, 1929.
Zewadski & Pierce, for Plaintiff in Error;
Fred H. Davis, Attorney General, and Roy Campbell, Assistant, for the State.

Opinion:
Brown, J.
The alleged judgment to which this writ of error is addressed is nothing more than the sentence of the court. It contains no adjudication by the court of the guilt of the defendant. Johnson v. State, 81 Fla. 783, 89 So. R. 114, and cases cited; Timmons v. State, 119 So. R. 393; Caughn v. State, 122 So. R. 565. As indicated in the eases cited, a so-called judgment which contains no adjudication by the court of the guilt of the defendant, does not constitute such a final judgment as will support a writ of error. The writ of error in this case, therefore, must be quashed.
Writ of error quashed.
Terreli,, C. J., and Ellis, J., concur.