Case Name: Omar Bosco SOTO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1970-03-10
Citations: 232 So. 2d 455
Docket Number: No. 69-581
Parties: Omar Bosco SOTO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before CHARLES CARROLL, BARK-DULL and HENDRY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 232
Pages: 455–456

Head Matter:
Omar Bosco SOTO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 69-581.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 10, 1970.
Snowden & Eefting and Louis Stoskopf, for appellant.
Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Jesse J. McCrary, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.
Before CHARLES CARROLL, BARK-DULL and HENDRY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellant, the defendant below, appeals from a conviction of the crime of robbery (hold up of a supermarket). On considering the appellant's contentions, in the light of the record and briefs, we find no error, and affirm. The evidence as to identification was sufficient. Positive identification testimony was given at trial by several witnesses. In the circumstances disclosed the in-court identification testimony was not tainted by the witnesses' prior out of court identification of the defendant. See Anderson v. State, Fla.App. 1968, 215 So.2d 618; Allen v. State, Fla.App.1969, 219 So.2d 444.
Affirmed.