Case Name: PIPER v. CASHELL et al.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1902
Citations: 1 Alaska Fed. 905
Docket Number: No. 853
Parties: PIPER v. CASHELL et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Alaska Federal Reports
Volume: 1
Pages: 905–906

Head Matter:
118 F. 1019
PIPER v. CASHELL et al.
No. 853.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
1902.
H. E. Shields and C. S. Hannum, for plaintiff in error.
Samuel Knight, for defendants in error.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In the above-entitled cause, counsel for the defendants in error having called the attention of the court to the fact that counsel who signed the brief for the plaintiff in error therein are not members of the bar of the circuit court of appeals, thereupon the court held that briefs which were not signed by counsel whose qualifications were consistent with the requirements of rule 7 of the court (31 C.C.A. cxliv, 90 F. cxliv) would not be considered by the court.