Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jamal Banks, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2000-10-10
Citations: 276 A.D.2d 294
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jamal Banks, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 276
Pages: 294–295

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jamal Banks, Appellant.
[714 NYS2d 20]

Opinion:
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph Fisch, J., at hearing; Nicholas Iacovetta, J., at jury trial and sentence), rendered November 13, 1998, convicting defendant of assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 6 years, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. The record supports the hearing court's finding that the photographs in the array shown to the complainant were sufficiently similar to avoid drawing attention to defendant. Any "minor discrepancies in apparent age between the individuals in the six photographs did not impermissibly highlight or distinguish defendant's photograph in any way" (People v Tapling, 159 AD2d 260, 261).
Defendant's request for a missing witness charge was. properly denied, since none of the requirements for such a charge were established. There was no showing that the witness was in a position to observe the events at issue, the witness's casual friendship with the complainant and his girlfriend did not place her within the People's "control" (People v Brunson, 270 AD2d 133, 134), and the People established that the witness was uncooperative and had become unavailable despite reasonable efforts to locate her. Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Tom, Ellerin, Rubin and Andrias, JJ.