Case Name: Philip A. NIBLOCK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2013-08-13
Citations: 406 S.W.3d 80
Docket Number: No. WD 75079
Parties: Philip A. NIBLOCK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Division Three: LISA WHITE HARDWICK, Presiding Judge, MARK D. PFEIFFER and CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Judges.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 406
Pages: 80–81

Head Matter:
Philip A. NIBLOCK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 75079.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Aug. 13, 2013.
Susan L. Hogan, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
Andrew C. Hooper, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before Division Three: LISA WHITE HARDWICK, Presiding Judge, MARK D. PFEIFFER and CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Judges.

Opinion:
Order
PER CURIAM.
Philip Niblock appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion, after he was convicted of first-degree tampering. Ni-block contends the motion court clearly erred in denying post-conviction relief because his defense counsel was ineffective for failing to call two potential alibi witnesses and failing to fully cross-examine the victim and impeach her testimony. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the motion court's judgment.
AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).