Case Name: Raymond C. Baker and Louise N. Baker, his wife, Appellants, v. R. H. Rowe, Appellee, Case No. 791
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1930-10-16
Citations: 102 Fla. 621
Docket Number: 
Parties: Raymond C. Baker and Louise N. Baker, his wife, Appellants, v. R. H. Rowe, Appellee, Case No. 791.
Judges: Terrell, O.J., and Whitfield, Strum and Brown, J.J., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 102
Pages: 621–622

Head Matter:
Raymond C. Baker and Louise N. Baker, his wife, Appellants, v. R. H. Rowe, Appellee, Case No. 791.
130 So. 278.
En Banc.
Decision filed October 16, 1930.
Eldridge Harl, for Appellants.
B. G. Horne, for Appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decrees herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties and the record having been seen and inspected and the Court now being advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decrees. It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decrees of the circuit court be, and the same are hereby affirmed.
Terrell, O.J., and Whitfield, Strum and Brown, J.J., concur.
Ellis and Bueord, J.J., dissent.