Case Name: Larry HATCH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-07-20
Citations: 138 S.W.3d 809
Docket Number: No. WD 62882
Parties: Larry HATCH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before SPINDEN, P.J., HOLLIGER and HARDWICK, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 138
Pages: 809–809

Head Matter:
Larry HATCH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 62882.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
July 20, 2004.
Nancy A. McKerrow, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.
Deborah Daniels, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before SPINDEN, P.J., HOLLIGER and HARDWICK, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Larry Hatch appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. He asserts his trial counsel was ineffective in failing to impeach the testimony of the State's primary witness. Upon review of the record, we find no error in the motion court's determination that trial counsel exercised reasonable trial strategy. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision because a published opinion would have no jurisprudential value.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).