Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Pablo SOTELO-CARRILLO, also known as Pablo Sotelo, also known as Pablo Sotero, also known as Pablo Sotelo Carrillo, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-08-21
Citations: 475 F. App'x 975
Docket Number: No. 11-20659
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Pablo SOTELO-CARRILLO, also known as Pablo Sotelo, also known as Pablo Sotero, also known as Pablo Sotelo Carrillo, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before SMITH, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 475
Pages: 975–976

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Pablo SOTELO-CARRILLO, also known as Pablo Sotelo, also known as Pablo Sotero, also known as Pablo Sotelo Carrillo, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-20659
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 21, 2012.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Neal Davis, III, Esq., Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before SMITH, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Pablo Sotelo-Carrillo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Sotelo-Carrillo has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.