Case Name: IN RE APPLICATION OF THE BURLINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS FOR AN INVESTIGATION OF THE OFFICE OF SHERIFF
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1983-05-16
Citations: 190 N.J. Super. 256
Docket Number: 
Parties: IN RE APPLICATION OF THE BURLINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS FOR AN INVESTIGATION OF THE OFFICE OF SHERIFF.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 190
Pages: 256–257

Head Matter:
IN RE APPLICATION OF THE BURLINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS FOR AN INVESTIGATION OF THE OFFICE OF SHERIFF.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued March 22, 1983
Decided May 16, 1983.
Before Judges MATTHEWS, ANTELL and FRANCIS.
Arnold M. Melik argued the cause for appellant Office of the Sheriff (Katzenbach, Gildea & Rudner, attorneys; Arnold M. Melik and Ezra D. Rosenberg, on the brief).
Michael J. Hogan, Burlington County Solicitor, argued the cause for respondent Board of Freeholders (Michael J. Hogan and Cynthia J. Nadolski, Assistant County Solicitor, on the brief).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Law Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Haines in his written opinion filed January 21, 1983, 188 N.J.Super. 343.
Affirmed.