Case Name: Earl W. Elliott, Respondent, v. Datus Clark and Others, Doing Business under the Firm Name of Datus Clark & Sons, and Ernest Delorme, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1930-03
Citations: 228 A.D. 871
Docket Number: 
Parties: Earl W. Elliott, Respondent, v. Datus Clark and Others, Doing Business under the Firm Name of Datus Clark & Sons, and Ernest Delorme, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 228
Pages: 871–871

Head Matter:
Earl W. Elliott, Respondent, v. Datus Clark and Others, Doing Business under the Firm Name of Datus Clark & Sons, and Ernest Delorme, Appellants.

Opinion:
Judgment and order reversed, on the law and the facts, and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellants to abide the event, on the ground that the finding that the defendants were negligent was against the weight of the evidence; and for errors in the charge. Hinman, Acting P. J., Davis, Whitmyer, Hill and Hasbrouek, JJ., concur.