Case Name: Treat v. Sacks, Warden
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1961-05-10
Citations: 172 Ohio St. 246
Docket Number: No. 36636
Parties: Treat v. Sacks, Warden.
Judges: Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Radcliee and O’Neill, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, New Service
Volume: 172
Pages: 246–247

Head Matter:
Treat v. Sacks, Warden.
(No. 36636
Decided May 10, 1961.)
Mr. Herbert Treat, in propria persona.
Mr. Mark, McElroy, attorney general, Mr. Aubrey A. Wendt and Mr. John J. Connors, Jr., for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
There is no showing or claim that petitioner made application to be discharged or brought to trial between the time of his indictment and trial. To entitle an accused to a discharge on the ground that he was not brought to trial during the time limited by statute, he must make application to the court therefor. State v. Cunningham, 171 Ohio St., 54.
Petitioner remanded to custody.
Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Radcliee and O'Neill, JJ., concur.
Radcliee, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Herbert, J.