Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerald Paul EDWARDS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-06-22
Citations: 134 F. App'x 763
Docket Number: No. 04-11367
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerald Paul EDWARDS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 134
Pages: 763–763

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerald Paul EDWARDS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 04-11367.
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Decided June 22, 2005.
Nancy E. Larson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Fort Worth, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Jerry V. Beard, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Lubbock, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jerald Paul Edwards presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir.2001), which rejected a Commerce Clause challenge to the felon-in-possession-of-a-firearm statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), and United States v. Dancy, 861 F.2d 77, 81 (5th Cir.1988), which held that the Government need not prove that the defendant knew that the firearm was in or affecting interstate commerce. The Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.