Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joshua Antone Bangawan FERNANDEZ, a.k.a. j_man89, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-02-27
Citations: 558 F. App'x 772
Docket Number: No. 13-50231
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joshua Antone Bangawan FERNANDEZ, a.k.a. j_man89, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: ALARCÓN, O’SCANNLAIN, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 558
Pages: 772–772

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joshua Antone Bangawan FERNANDEZ, a.k.a. j_man89, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-50231.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 18, 2014.
Filed Feb. 27, 2014.
Daniel Hyun Kun Ahn, Assistant U.S., Curtis A. Kin, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Jeffrey A. Aaron, Esquire, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Riverside, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: ALARCÓN, O’SCANNLAIN, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Joshua Antone Bangawan Fernandez appeals from the district court's judgment and challenges the 20-year term of supervised release and mandatory drug-testing condition imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for distribution of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(2)(A) and (b)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Fernandez contends that the district court erred by failing to consider and address his mitigating arguments and, as a result, imposed a substantively unreasonable term of supervised release. The record shows that the district court did not procedurally err and the 20-year term is substantively reasonable in light of the totality of the circumstances and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors. See United States v. Apodaca, 641 F.3d 1077, 1082-84 (9th Cir.2011).
Fernandez next contends that the district court erred in imposing the mandatory condition of drug testing as part of his supervised release. Because Fernandez did not object to this condition in the district court, we review for plain error, see United States v. Garcia, 522 F.3d 855, 860 (9th Cir.2008), and find none. Drug testing is a mandatory condition of supervised release. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d). Although Fernandez does not have a history of drug use and drugs did not play a role in the offense, the district court properly imposed this condition because there is no evidence he has a low risk of future substance abuse. See United States v. Jackson, 189 F.3d 820, 825 (9th Cir.1999).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.