Case Name: Walter Hatter and R. E. Evans, Appellants, v. Ames A. Barlow, Celinda F. Barlow, Albert L. McGlaun, G. N. Hendry, Mabel L. Mead, Albert L. McGlaun, Trustee, Ames A. Barlow, Trustee, John W. Pinkerton, Robert B. Holmes, R. E. Evans, George H. Bruen and Brevard County State Bank, a Corporation, Appellees
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1924-01-07
Citations: 86 Fla. 637
Docket Number: 
Parties: Walter Hatter and R. E. Evans, Appellants, v. Ames A. Barlow, Celinda F. Barlow, Albert L. McGlaun, G. N. Hendry, Mabel L. Mead, Albert L. McGlaun, Trustee, Ames A. Barlow, Trustee, John W. Pinkerton, Robert B. Holmes, R. E. Evans, George H. Bruen and Brevard County State Bank, a Corporation, Appellees.
Judges: Whitfield, P. J., and West and Terrell, J. J., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 86
Pages: 637–637

Head Matter:
Walter Hatter and R. E. Evans, Appellants, v. Ames A. Barlow, Celinda F. Barlow, Albert L. McGlaun, G. N. Hendry, Mabel L. Mead, Albert L. McGlaun, Trustee, Ames A. Barlow, Trustee, John W. Pinkerton, Robert B. Holmes, R. E. Evans, George H. Bruen and Brevard County State Bank, a Corporation, Appellees.
Opinion Filed January 7, 1924.
This case was decided by Division B.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County; James W. Perkins, Judge.
Kay, Adams & Ragland, for Appellants;
Noah, B. Butt, for Appellees.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This appeal is from interlocutory orders sustaining demurrers of amended bills of complaint.
Upon full consideration of the record, it appears that the amended bills of complaint do not wholly fail to state an equity in favor of- the complainants, therefore the general demurrers to the amended bills ,of complaint should not have been sustained.
Reversed.
Whitfield, P. J., and West and Terrell, J. J., concur.