Case Name: BAILEY v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1920-11-24
Citations: 225 S.W. 515
Docket Number: No. 5989
Parties: BAILEY v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 225
Pages: 515–516

Head Matter:
BAILEY v. STATE.
(No. 5989.)
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Nov. 24, 1920.)
Criminal law <&wkey;I094 — Judgment affirmed In absence of bills of exception or statement of fact. •
Where the indictment, charge, and record are in conformity with law, and there are no bills of exception or statement of facts, the judgment will be affirmed.
Appeal from District Court, Bexar County; W. S. Anderson, Judge.
Irwin Bailey, alias C. E. Bailpy, was convicted of theft, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
Alvin M. Owsley, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Opinion:
LATTIMORE, J.
Appellant was convicted in the Thirty-Seventh district court of Bexar county, of the offense of the theft of property of the value of more than $50, ana his punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of 10 years.
The case is brought before us without statement of facts or bills of exceptions. We have carefully examined the indictment, the charge of the court, and the record in its entirety, and find that same in every respect appears to be in conformity with the law.
The judgment of the trial court will therefore be affirmed.