Case Name: Edward Andrew CUNNINGHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1985-03-20
Citations: 464 So. 2d 1359
Docket Number: No. 85-450
Parties: Edward Andrew CUNNINGHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: DOWNEY, HURLEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 464
Pages: 1359–1359

Head Matter:
Edward Andrew CUNNINGHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 85-450.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
March 20, 1985.
Alan H. Schreiber, Public Defender, and John D. Voigt, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a denial of Motion for Post-conviction Relief brought pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. It was denied without an evidentia-ry hearing and without stated reasons.
It is basic that a trial court order is presumed to be correct and that it will be affirmed if there is a legal basis for it. The motion itself is unsworn and in gross violation of the requirements of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. It does not refer to exhibits. The mentioned deficiencies justify the trial court order denying post-conviction relief.
Affirmed.
DOWNEY, HURLEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.