Case Name: Daniel KING, Petitioner v. RIVERWATCH CONDOMINIUM OWNER'S ASSOCIATION, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2017-02-28
Citations: 167 A.3d 700
Docket Number: No. 739 MAL 2016
Parties: Daniel KING, Petitioner v. RIVERWATCH CONDOMINIUM OWNER’S ASSOCIATION, Respondent
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 167
Pages: 700–701

Head Matter:
Daniel KING, Petitioner v. RIVERWATCH CONDOMINIUM OWNER’S ASSOCIATION, Respondent
No. 739 MAL 2016
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
February 28, 2017

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 28th day of February, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.
The Application for Relief Pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 123, filed by Riverwatch Condominium Owners Association, is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. See King v. Delaware County Court of Common Pleas Judge, 2 MM 2017 (order dated February 28, 2017) (issuing a rule on Petitioners "to show cause why they should not be barred from submitting any further filings in this Court relative to the civil action involving Riverwatch Condominium Owners Association, including any related orders concerning the awards of costs, as well as directives barring Thomas P. Gan-non, Esquire, from representing Daniel King.").