Case Name: Maud E. S. Depierris, App'lt, v. Henry B. Slavin et al., Resp'ts
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1894-03-16
Citations: 59 N.Y. St. Rep. 881
Docket Number: 
Parties: Maud E. S. Depierris, App’lt, v. Henry B. Slavin et al., Resp’ts.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 59
Pages: 881–881

Head Matter:
Maud E. S. Depierris, App’lt, v. Henry B. Slavin et al., Resp’ts.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We think that there are subjects of examination pertinent to the cause of action alleged which do not necessarily tend to establish the commission of any criminal offense upon tlie part of the defendants, and for that reason, there being no other question submitted to us, the order should be affirmed. Davies v. Fish, 35 Hun, 430. The order must be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.