Case Name: Martin G. SANCHEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1969-04-09
Citations: 438 S.W.2d 915
Docket Number: No. 42004
Parties: Martin G. SANCHEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 438
Pages: 915–916

Head Matter:
Martin G. SANCHEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
No. 42004.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
April 9, 1969.
No attorney of record on appeal for appellant.
Jim D. Vollers, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
OPINION
BELCHER, Judge.
The conviction is for felony theft; the punishment, two years.
The appellant did not comply with Section 9 of Article 40.09, Vernon's Ann.C.C. P., in that he did not file a brief in the trial court "[wjithin thirty days after approval of the record by the court" or dur ing any additional period which the court authorized setting forth the grounds of error of which he desires to complain on appeal. Hill v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 403 S.W.2d 797; Yarbrough v. State, Tex.Cr. App., 408 S.W.2d 230; Melick v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 409 S.W.2d 412; Dewitt v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 409 S.W.2d 852; Ochoa v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 424 S.W.2d 642.
Nothing appears in the record which should be considered under the provisions of Section 13 of Article 40.09, supra.
No question of indigency is presented.
The judgment is affirmed.