Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Samad Madir HARVEY, a/k/a Wes, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-03-31
Citations: 564 F. App'x 19
Docket Number: No. 13-4570
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Samad Madir HARVEY, a/k/a Wes, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 564
Pages: 19–19

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Samad Madir HARVEY, a/k/a Wes, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-4570.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 27, 2014.
Decided: March 31, 2014.
L. Richard Walker, Senior Litigator, Kristen Leddy, Research and Writing Specialist, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellant. Zelda E. Wesley, Assistant United States Attorney, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Samad Madir Harvey appeals from his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm. On appeal, he challenges the district court's denial of his motion for a new trial. We review the district court's ruling for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Smith, 451 F.3d 209, 216 (4th Cir.2006). We have carefully considered the parties' briefs on appeal and the record, and we conclude that the district court's reasoning was appropriate and contained no abuse of discretion. (See J.A. at 326-43). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.