Case Name: Ruth E. BERNSTEIN, Appellant, v. GOODBODY & COMPANY, a New York Limited Partnership, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1967-12-05
Citations: 204 So. 2d 539
Docket Number: No. 67-207
Parties: Ruth E. BERNSTEIN, Appellant, v. GOODBODY & COMPANY, a New York Limited Partnership, Appellee.
Judges: Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and SWANN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 204
Pages: 539–539

Head Matter:
Ruth E. BERNSTEIN, Appellant, v. GOODBODY & COMPANY, a New York Limited Partnership, Appellee.
No. 67-207.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
Dec. 5, 1967.
Rehearing Denied Dec. 21, 1967.
Howard A. Rose and Norman Scvin, Miami, for appellant.
Dixon, Dejarnette, Bradford, Williams, McKay & Kimbrell and Carl K. Ploffmann, Miami, for appellee.
Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and SWANN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See: Automatic Canteen Company of America v. Butler, Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 712; 21 Fla.Jur., Limitation of Actions, § 37; § 95.11(4), 95.11(5) (c), Fla.Stat., F.S.A.; Vol. 1, Williston on Contracts, 3rd Ed., § 73, 83, 85, 86.