Case Name: Newman W. Warsawer, Resp't, v. Horace L. Hotchkiss et al., App'lts
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1894-02-12
Citations: 57 N.Y. St. Rep. 869
Docket Number: 
Parties: Newman W. Warsawer, Resp’t, v. Horace L. Hotchkiss et al., App’lts.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 57
Pages: 869–869

Head Matter:
Filed February 12, 1894.
Newman W. Warsawer, Resp’t, v. Horace L. Hotchkiss et al., App’lts.
T. Henry Dewey for app’lts; Baldwin F. Sirauss, for resp’t.

Opinion:
Dykman, J.
This is an appeal from so much of an order made at the special term as relates to the name of the agent of the defendants who gave to the assignee of the plaintiff the false and fraudulent information alleged in the third paragraph of the complaint. We think the proper disposition of the case was made at the special term, and that the order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.