Case Name: Carl Perel, Respondent, v. Moe Brozen, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1941-06-11
Citations: 176 Misc. 754
Docket Number: 
Parties: Carl Perel, Respondent, v. Moe Brozen, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 176
Pages: 754–754

Head Matter:
Carl Perel, Respondent, v. Moe Brozen, Appellant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
June 11, 1941.
Michael Popper, for the appellant.
Charles J. Her son [Sidney Sarnoff of counsel], for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Supplementary proceedings based upon a Municipal Court judgment must" be brought in the City Court. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 777.) Section 793 of the Civil Practice Act affords an additional remedy in supplementary proceedings, and when based on a Municipal Court judgment relief must be sought in the City Court.
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion denied.
All concur. Present — McCook, Miller and McLaughlin, JJ.