Case Name: Ittel, Jr., et al. v. Tucker, et al.
Court: Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1973-03-13
Citations: 8 Pa. Commw. 434
Docket Number: No. 231 C.D. 1973
Parties: Ittel, Jr., et al. v. Tucker, et al.
Judges: before Judges Wilkinson, Jk., Menceb and Blatt, sitting as a panel of three.
Reporter: Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court Reports
Volume: 8
Pages: 434–436

Head Matter:
Ittel, Jr., et al. v. Tucker, et al.
Argued March 12, 1973,
before Judges Wilkinson, Jk., Menceb and Blatt, sitting as a panel of three.
Rochelle 8. Friedman, with her Frank W. Ittel, Jr., for petitioners.
Lawrence J. Beaser, Deputy Attorney General, with him Israel Packel, Attorney General, for respondents, Tucker, Sparvero, Wekselman, Johnson and Schwartz.
William R. Caroselli, Assistant County Solicitor, with him Anthony V. DeCello? Assistant County Solici tor, and Francis A. Barry, County Solicitor, for respondents, Staisey, Foersfcer and Hunt.
March 13, 1973:

Opinion:
Opinion
Per Curiam,
For the reasons set forth in our opinion filed in Allegheny County Commissioners, et al. v. C. DeLores Tucker, 7 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 649, A. 2d , filed February 20, 1973, we enter the following
Order
And Now, March 13, 1973, the Petition for Declaratory Judgment is allowed, and we hereby declare that the Act of December 29, 1971, P. L. 630, No. 167, Section 3, 17 P.S. §790.63, is constitutional, and declare further that the commissions issued by C. DeLores Tucker, Secretary of the Commonwealth, to respondents Louis Sparvero, I. Martin Wekselman, Livingstone Johnson, and Nathan Schwartz are valid.