Case Name: JUSTICE v. DUNBAR
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1978-05-16
Citations: 241 Ga. 327
Docket Number: 33547
Parties: JUSTICE v. DUNBAR.
Judges: All the Justices concur, except Jordan and Bowles, JJ., who dissent.
Reporter: Georgia Reports
Volume: 241
Pages: 327–328

Head Matter:
33547.
JUSTICE v. DUNBAR.

Opinion:
Marshall, Justice.
This appeal is from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fulton County granting the defendant's motion for summary judgment in the plaintiff's action to remove an obstruction (a fence) from an alleged private way.
The apparent contended basis for jurisdiction of this appeal in this court (there being no jurisdictional statement in the notice of appeal, as required by Code Ann. § 6-802 (Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 20; as amended)) is the prayer for the equitable relief of injunction of the threatened future obstruction of the roadway, which is alleged to be a "continuous" nuisance. However, "[o]ur Code, § 83-119, gives a summary remedy for the removal of obstructions across a private way." Campbell v. Deal, 185 Ga. 474, 480 (195 SE 432) (1938). "If the obstruction of a private way has been completed, the statutory remedy before the ordinary [judge of the probate court now] will afford to the users a full and adequate remedy at law by removal of the obstruction, so that in such a case a petition for injunction will not lie." Hall v. Browning, 195 Ga. 423 (3) (24 SE2d 392) (1943).
Accordingly, the action is construed as one brought under Code § 83-119, and which involves no equity or other bases of our jurisdiction under Code Ann. § 2-3104 (Art. VI, Sec. II, Par. IV, Ga. Const. of 1976). See Carter v. Kinman, 231 Ga. 759 (204 SE2d 299) (1974); Putnam v. Sewell, 209 Ga. 28 (70 SE2d 462) (1952). Therefore, the appeal must be, and is, transferred to the Court of Appeals for a consideration of the remaining issues in the case.
Submitted May 5, 1978
Decided May 16, 1978.
Glyndon C. Pruitt, for appellant.
John C. Tyler, for appellee.
Transferred to the Court of Appeals.
All the Justices concur, except Jordan and Bowles, JJ., who dissent.