Case Name: Melvin BROWN, Appellant v. Sandra HILL, et al., Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-02-16
Citations: 686 F. App'x 6
Docket Number: No. 16-7059
Parties: Melvin BROWN, Appellant v. Sandra HILL, et al., Appellees
Judges: BEFORE: Henderson, Brown, and Pillard, Circuit Judges
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 686
Pages: 6–7

Head Matter:
Melvin BROWN, Appellant v. Sandra HILL, et al., Appellees
No. 16-7059
September Term, 2016
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Filed On: February 16, 2017
Melvin Brown, Pro Se
Carol S. Blumenthal, Attorney, Blumen-thal & Cordone, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Defendants-Appellees Sandra Hill, Suzanne Bond, Belinda Sealey, Lawrence Parot, Richard Gerlach, Susan Bond, John Adams
Stacy Anderson, Assistant Attorney General, Loren L. AliKhan, Deputy Solicitor General, Todd Sunhwae Kim, Solicitor General, Jason Harold Lederstein, Office of the Attorney General, District of Columbia, Office of the Solicitor General, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee David Walker
Jeffrey Brian Hardie, Hunton & Williams LLP, McLean, VA, for Defendant-Appellee Green Door Corporation
BEFORE: Henderson, Brown, and Pillard, Circuit Judges

Opinion:
JUDGMENT
Per Curiam
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs and appendices filed by the parties. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). Upon consideration of the foregoing and the motion for appointment of counsel, it is
ORDERED that the motion for appointment of counsel be denied. It is
FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the case be remanded for the district court to determine whether appellant should have been allowed to file the second amended complaint that is attached to his brief and, if so, for further proceedings concerning the complaint. The second amended complaint was stamped "received" by the clerk of the district and bankruptcy courts on November 24, 2015, but, for reasons unclear, it does not appear on the district court's docket.
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.