Case Name: LINEAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, Plaintiff/Counterclaimant-Appellant, v. IMPALA LINEAR CORPORATION, Toyoda Automatic Loom Works, Ltd., and Analog Devices, Inc., Defendants, and Maxim Integrated Products, Inc., Defendant/Counterclaim Defendant-Cross Appellant, and Unitrode Corporation, Defendant, and Ronald Vinsant, Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee; Linear Technology Corporation, Plaintiff/Counterclaimant-Appellant, v. Impala Linear Corporation, Toyoda Automatic Loom Works, Ltd., and Analog Devices, Inc., Defendants, and Maxim Integrated Products, Inc., Defendant/Counterclaim Defendant, and Unitrode Corporation, Defendant/Counterclaim Defendant-Cross Appellant, and Ronald Vinsant, Counterclaim Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-04-30
Citations: 64 F. App'x 226
Docket Number: Nos. 02-1569, 02-1570, 02-1576 and 02-1599
Parties: LINEAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, Plaintiff/Counterclaimant-Appellant, v. IMPALA LINEAR CORPORATION, Toyoda Automatic Loom Works, Ltd., and Analog Devices, Inc., Defendants, and Maxim Integrated Products, Inc., Defendant/Counterclaim Defendant-Cross Appellant, and Unitrode Corporation, Defendant, and Ronald Vinsant, Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee. Linear Technology Corporation, Plaintiff/Counterclaimant-Appellant, v. Impala Linear Corporation, Toyoda Automatic Loom Works, Ltd., and Analog Devices, Inc., Defendants, and Maxim Integrated Products, Inc., Defendant/Counterclaim Defendant, and Unitrode Corporation, Defendant/Counterclaim Defendant-Cross Appellant, and Ronald Vinsant, Counterclaim Defendant.
Judges: Before BRYSON, Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 64
Pages: 226–227

Head Matter:
LINEAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, Plaintiff/Counterclaimant-Appellant, v. IMPALA LINEAR CORPORATION, Toyoda Automatic Loom Works, Ltd., and Analog Devices, Inc., Defendants, and Maxim Integrated Products, Inc., Defendant/Counterclaim Defendant-Cross Appellant, and Unitrode Corporation, Defendant, and Ronald Vinsant, Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee. Linear Technology Corporation, Plaintiff/Counterclaimant-Appellant, v. Impala Linear Corporation, Toyoda Automatic Loom Works, Ltd., and Analog Devices, Inc., Defendants, and Maxim Integrated Products, Inc., Defendant/Counterclaim Defendant, and Unitrode Corporation, Defendant/Counterclaim Defendant-Cross Appellant, and Ronald Vinsant, Counterclaim Defendant.
Nos. 02-1569, 02-1570, 02-1576 and 02-1599.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
DECIDED: April 30, 2003.
Before BRYSON, Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
Linear Technology Corporation and Unitrode Corporation jointly move to dismiss their appeal and cross appeal with respect to each other, 02-1570 and 02-1599. Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. provides a notice of supplemental authority pursuant to Fed. R. App P. 28(j).
Linear states that it will respond to Maxim's supplemental authority in its brief. Pursuant to the recently amended federal rule, Linear must respond to the supplemental authority in a letter that is similarly limited to no more than 350 words.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) The joint motion to dismiss 02-1570 and 02-1599 is granted.
(2) Each side shall bear its own costs in 02-1570 and 02-1599.
(3) The revised official caption in 02-1569, -1576 is reflected above.
(4) Linear's response letter is due within 14 days. Maxim's letter and Linear's letter -will be provided to the merits panel that is assigned to hear their appeals.