Case Name: James E. ROBERTS, Appellant, v. Gladys S. ROBERTS, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1958-10-09
Citations: 260 F.2d 486
Docket Number: No. 14367
Parties: James E. ROBERTS, Appellant, v. Gladys S. ROBERTS, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 260
Pages: 486–487

Head Matter:
James E. ROBERTS, Appellant, v. Gladys S. ROBERTS, Appellee.
No. 14367.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued Sept. 24, 1958.
Decided Oct. 9, 1958.
Petition for Rehearing Denied Oct. 31, 1958.
Mr. George E. C. Hayes, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. James A. Cobb, Julian R. Dugas and Luke C. Moore, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellant.
Mr. Joseph C. Waddy, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. William C. Gardner, William B. Bryant, and Marion C. George, Jr., Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellee.
Before Wilbur K. Miller, Danaher and Bastian, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This ease is before us on appeal from a judgment of the District Court declaring a decree of divorce entered December 7, 1955, in the Chancery Court of Garland County, Arkansas, in the case of James E. Roberts v. Gladys S. Roberts to be null and void, and holding that the interests and rights of the appellee in certain premises in the District of Columbia are unaffected by the said decree.
We have carefully considered the transcript, as appellant had asked us to do. We are satisfied that appellant has failed to sustain his burden of persuading us that we should reject the findings and conclusions of the trier and substitute others favorable to him.
Accordingly, the judgment should be and is
Affirmed.