Case Name: COMMERCIAL CREDIT CO., Inc., v. WILLIAMS
Court: Texas Courts of Civil Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1935-09-19
Citations: 87 S.W.2d 499
Docket Number: No. 4735
Parties: COMMERCIAL CREDIT CO., Inc., v. WILLIAMS.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 87
Pages: 499–500

Head Matter:
COMMERCIAL CREDIT CO., Inc., v. WILLIAMS.
No. 4735.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Texarkana.
Sept. 19, 1935.
Cantey, Hanger & McMahon and J. A. Gooch, all of Fort Worth, for appellant.
Fred V. Hughes, of Tyler, Edwin Lacy, of Longview, and Geo. Prendergast, of Marshall, for appellee.

Opinion:
JOHNSON, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from an order of the district court of the One Hundred Twenty-fourth district, Gregg county, Tex., overruling the plea of privilege filed by appellant. Appellee's suit was for damages, alleging that appellant by and through its agent and representative, A. D. Hamilton, together with other persons named in the petition, residents of Gregg county, Tex., and made parties to the suit, willfully, unlawfully, and without excuse or justification, or authority or warrant of law, went into the private residence of appellee and caused her arrest and restraint, and there committed other acts of violence, to plaintiff's damage fully and in detail set out in the petition.
Appellant's brief does'not contain any assignment of error. Article 1844, R. S. 1925, as amended by Acts of the 42d Legislature (1931), p. 117, c. 75, § 1 (Vernon's Ann. Civ. St. art. 1844), providing that the appellant may embody in his brief in the appellate court his assignments of error, has been construed tp be mandatory. Lamar-Delta County Levee Improvement Dist. No. 2 v. Dunn (Tex. Civ. App.) 42 S.W. (2d) 872, affirmed (Tex. Com. App.) 61 S.W. (2d) 816, following Lamar-Delta County Improvement District No. 2 v. Gordon (Tex. Com. App.) 61 S.W.(2d) 817; Lamar-Delta County Improvement District No. 2 v. Gordon (Tex. Com. App.) 61 S.W.(2d) 818; rule 23.
Appellant's brief contains a proposition, but not being based upon any assignment of error, we are not authorized to consider it. Columbian National Fire Insurance Co. v. Dixie Co-op. Mail Order House (Tex. Com. App.) 276 S. W. 219.
We have examined the record and it presents no fundamental error. Therefore, the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.