Case Name: UNWIRED PLANET, LLC, Appellant v. GOOGLE INC., Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-04-04
Citations: 682 F. App'x 928
Docket Number: 2015-1812
Parties: UNWIRED PLANET, LLC, Appellant v. GOOGLE INC., Appellee
Judges: Before Prost, Chief Judge, Newman, Plager , Lourie, Dyk, Moore, O’Malley, Reyna, Wallach, Taranto, Chen, Hughes, and Stoll, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 682
Pages: 928–930

Head Matter:
UNWIRED PLANET, LLC, Appellant v. GOOGLE INC., Appellee
2015-1812
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
April 4, 2017
William M. Jay, Goodwin Procter LLP, Goodwin Procter LLP, Washington, DC, Brett M. Schuman, Esq., Litigation Counsel, Goodwin Procter LLP, San Francisco, CA, Eleanor M. Yost, Attorney, Carlton Fields Jordan Burt, PA, Washington, DC, David Zimmer, Goodwin Procter LLP,' San Francisco, CA, for Appellant
Neal Kumar Katyal, Keith O’Doherty, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Washington, DC, Peter Andrew Detre, Munger, Tolies & Olson, LLP, San Francisco, CA, Adam R. Lawton, Munger, Tolies & Olson LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Michael V. Messinger, Director, Joseph E. Mutschelknaus, Attorney, Deirdre M. Wells, Attorney, Jon Wright, Attorney, Sterne Kessler Gold-stein & Fox, PLLC, Washington, DC, Thomas Schmidt, Hogan Lovells US LLP, New York, NY, for Appellee
John Thorne, Attorney, Joshua D. Bran-son, Attorney, Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Amici Curiae The Internet Association, SAS Institute, Inc., Symmetry, LLC, Dell Inc., Ebay Inc., Red Hat, Inc., SAP America, Inc.
William G. Jenks, Attorney, Jenks IP Law, Washington, DC, Kevin Jakel, Jonathan Rudolph Kominek Stroud, Chief Counsel, Unified Patents Inc., Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae Unified Patents Inc.
Before Prost, Chief Judge, Newman, Plager , Lourie, Dyk, Moore, O’Malley, Reyna, Wallach, Taranto, Chen, Hughes, and Stoll, Circuit Judges.
Circuit Judge Plager participated only in the decision on the petition for panel rehearing.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
HUGHES, Circuit Judge,
concurring in the denial of the petition for panel rehearing.
ORDER
Appellee Google Inc. filed a petition for rehearing en banc. A response to the petition was invited by the court and filed by Appellant Unwired Planet, LLC. The petition was first referred as a petition for rehearing to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition for rehearing en banc was referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service.
Upon consideration thereof,
It Is Ordered That:
(1) The petition for panel rehearing is denied.
(2) The petition for rehearing en banc is denied.
The mandate of the court -will issue on April 11,2017.