Case Name: Peggy S. CISKO, Appellant, v. PHOENIX MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2006-06-14
Citations: 930 So. 2d 853
Docket Number: No. 2D05-5640
Parties: Peggy S. CISKO, Appellant, v. PHOENIX MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC., Appellee.
Judges: ALTENBERND and CASANUEVA, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 930
Pages: 853–853

Head Matter:
Peggy S. CISKO, Appellant, v. PHOENIX MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC., Appellee.
No. 2D05-5640.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
June 14, 2006.
Douglas L. Wilson of The Wilson Law Firm, Naples, for Appellant.
Cathy S. Reiman of Roetzel & Andress, L.P.A., Naples, for Appellee.

Opinion:
WHATLEY, Judge.
We reverse the order dismissing Cisko's complaint for lack of prosecution pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(e) because there was, on the face of the record, activity within the one-year period, i.e., an interrogatory served by Cisko. See Wilson v. Salamon, 923 So.2d 363 (Fla.2005).
Reversed and remanded; Cisko's complaint reinstated.
ALTENBERND and CASANUEVA, JJ., Concur.