Case Name: STOKES v. INVESTORS' & TRADERS' REALTY CO. et al.
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1910-04-29
Citations: 122 N.Y.S. 679
Docket Number: 
Parties: STOKES v. INVESTORS’ & TRADERS’ REALTY CO. et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 122
Pages: 679–679

Head Matter:
STOKES v. INVESTORS’ & TRADERS’ REALTY CO. et al.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
April 29, 1910.)
Trial (§ 13 )—Calendars—Preference—Rules of Court.
Plaintiff being clearly entitled to a preference under the rules of the court, it was error to refuse his motion therefor.
[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Trial, Dec. Dig. § 13. ]
Appeal from Special Term, New York County.
Action by Jane A. Stokes against the Investors’ & Traders’ Realty Company and others. From an order denying his motion for a preference, plaintiff appeals.
Reversed and granted.
Argued before INGRAHAM, P. . J., and McLAUGHLIN, CLARKE, SCOTT, and DOWLING, JJ.
George W. Carr, for appellant.
Charles L. Hoffman, for respondents.
For other cases see same topic & § number in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep'r Indexes

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
As the plaintiff was clearly entitled to a preference under the rules of this court, it was. error for the judge below to' refuse to grant it.
The order is therefore reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs.