Case Name: Sharon POHL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2003-02-19
Citations: 837 So. 2d 1123
Docket Number: No. 4D01-4823
Parties: Sharon POHL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: STONE, GROSS and MAY, JJ„ concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 837
Pages: 1123–1124

Head Matter:
Sharon POHL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D01-4823.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb. 19, 2003.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Paul E. Petillo, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Donna M. Hoffmann, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm appellant's convictions of tampering with a witness, contrary to section 914.22(1), Florida Statute (2000), and retaliation against a witness, in violation of section 914.23, Florida Statutes (2000). We reverse appellant's conviction of harassing a witness under section 914.22(2), Florida Statutes (2000), because there was no evidence that appellant's contact with the police informant hindered, delayed, prevented, or dissuaded the informant from engaging in any of the conduct specified in section 914.22(2)(a)-(d).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part.
STONE, GROSS and MAY, JJ" concur.