Case Name: Jerry Bernard JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kelly MILLER, prosecutor at Mecklenburg County courts; Sean F. Perrin, prosecutor at Mecklenburg County courts; Kathleen K. Lucchesi, prosecutor at Mecklenburg County courts, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-05-20
Citations: 96 F. App'x 921
Docket Number: No. 04-6491
Parties: Jerry Bernard JACKSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Kelly MILLER, prosecutor at Mecklenburg County courts; Sean F. Perrin, prosecutor at Mecklenburg County courts; Kathleen K. Lucchesi, prosecutor at Mecklenburg County courts, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 96
Pages: 921–921

Head Matter:
Jerry Bernard JACKSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Kelly MILLER, prosecutor at Mecklenburg County courts; Sean F. Perrin, prosecutor at Mecklenburg County courts; Kathleen K. Lucchesi, prosecutor at Mecklenburg County courts, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 04-6491.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 13, 2004.
Decided: May 20, 2004.
Jerry Bernard Jackson, Appellant pro se.
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Jerry Bernard Jackson appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the district court's reasoning that Defendants were entitled to absolute immunity. See Jackson v. Miller, No. CA-04-12-3 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 17, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED