Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Rodney AMIE, also known as Hoop, also known as Oof, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-08-22
Citations: 579 F. App'x 247
Docket Number: No. 13-11288
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Rodney AMIE, also known as Hoop, also known as Oof, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before DAVIS, CLEMENT and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 579
Pages: 247–248

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Rodney AMIE, also known as Hoop, also known as Oof, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-11288
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 22, 2014.
James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Bonita L. Gunden, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Amarillo, TX, William Ernest Hermesmeyer, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Of fice, Fort Worth, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before DAVIS, CLEMENT and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rodney Amie has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Amie has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Amie's response. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no non-frivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th CiR. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.