Case Name: Melvin FORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-09-04
Citations: 376 S.W.3d 706
Docket Number: No. ED 97301
Parties: Melvin FORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., C.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 376
Pages: 706–706

Head Matter:
Melvin FORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 97301.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Sept. 4, 2012.
Timothy J. Forneris, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Chris Foster, Attorney General, John Winston Grantham, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., C.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Melvin Ford, also known as James Spann ("Ford"), appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying Ford's request for post-conviction relief. We affirm.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).