Case Name: Mark WESTERGAARD, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2019-04-16
Citations: 571 S.W.3d 701
Docket Number: No. ED 106833
Parties: Mark WESTERGAARD, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 571
Pages: 701–701

Head Matter:
Mark WESTERGAARD, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 106833
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Filed: April 16, 2019
Susan A. DeGeorge, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.
Eric S. Schmitt, Atty. Gen., Shaun J. Mackelprang, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.
Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
The movant, Mark Westergaard, appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief relying on State v. Bazell , 497 S.W.3d 263 (Mo. banc 2016). We have reviewed the parties' briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035. An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.
We affirm the motion court's judgment denying the movant's Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 84.16(b)(2).