Case Name: Eddie M. RODRIQUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Helen F. FAHEY, Chairwoman, Virginia Parole Board, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-09-08
Citations: 199 F. App'x 272
Docket Number: No. 06-6706
Parties: Eddie M. RODRIQUEZ, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Helen F. FAHEY, Chairwoman, Virginia Parole Board, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 199
Pages: 272–273

Head Matter:
Eddie M. RODRIQUEZ, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Helen F. FAHEY, Chairwoman, Virginia Parole Board, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 06-6706.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 18, 2006.
Decided: Sept. 8, 2006.
Eddie M. Rodriquez, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Eddie M. Rodriquez appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rodriquez v. Fahey, No. 1:05-cv-0150S-TSE (E.D.Va. Apr. 4, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.