Case Name: David A. GAMBINO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dr. MOUBAREK, MD; Carol Miller, Hit; Kristi Crites, CRNP; Tom Gera, RN; Todd C, PA-C; Amerzua Jody, L.RN; Boch P., RN; Vanmeter Denise, RN; Warden Stewart, Warden; McGahee Tequila, DMD; Blaine Smith, MD; Carrie Hanscom, Director of Radiology, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-03-06
Citations: 678 F. App'x 169
Docket Number: No. 16-6647
Parties: David A. GAMBINO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dr. MOUBAREK, MD; Carol Miller, Hit; Kristi Crites, CRNP; Tom Gera, RN; Todd C, PA-C; Amerzua Jody, L.RN; Boch P., RN; Vanmeter Denise, RN; Warden Stewart, Warden; McGahee Tequila, DMD; Blaine Smith, MD; Carrie Hanscom, Director of Radiology, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 678
Pages: 169–170

Head Matter:
David A. GAMBINO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dr. MOUBAREK, MD; Carol Miller, Hit; Kristi Crites, CRNP; Tom Gera, RN; Todd C, PA-C; Amerzua Jody, L.RN; Boch P., RN; Vanmeter Denise, RN; Warden Stewart, Warden; McGahee Tequila, DMD; Blaine Smith, MD; Carrie Hanscom, Director of Radiology, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-6647
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: February 22, 2017
Decided: March 6, 2017
David A. Gambino, Appellant Pro Se.
Jane Elizabeth Andersen, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland; Christopher Ryan Daily, BRADY, FISCHEL & DAILY, LLC, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
David A. Gambino appeals the district court's order dismissing his complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Although we agree that Gambino failed to exhaust his claims and dismissal is mandatory, the dismissal should have been without prejudice to his right to refile should exhaustion become complete. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court as modified to reflect dismissal without prejudice. Gambino v. Moubarek, No. 8:15-cv-02202-TDC, 2016 WL 1644360 (D. Md. Apr. 22, 2016). We deny Gambino's motions for injunctive relief, for a continuance, and to supplement the appeal with new evidence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED