Case Name: Michael Patrick CLEMENT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1985-05-08
Citations: 468 So. 2d 467
Docket Number: No. 84-1573
Parties: Michael Patrick CLEMENT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: HERSEY, GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 468
Pages: 467–468

Head Matter:
Michael Patrick CLEMENT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 84-1573.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
May 8, 1985.
Mandate Stayed and Rehearing Denied June 5, 1985.
Howard L. Finkelstein of Finkelstein and Dallas, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert L. Teitler, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
While we affirm all of the judgment and convictions, we must remand for resentenc-ing. The trial court did not have the benefit of our decision in Boynton v. State, 10 F.L.W. 795 (Fla. 4th DCA March 27, 1985).
Upon resentencing, there can be no retention of jurisdiction, and any departure from the guidelines must be based upon clear and convincing reasons, expressed in writing.
HERSEY, GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.