Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Saydon Kurtis BURNEY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-03-07
Citations: 415 F. App'x 449
Docket Number: No. 10-6709
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Saydon Kurtis BURNEY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 415
Pages: 449–450

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Saydon Kurtis BURNEY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-6709.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 28, 2011.
Decided: March 7, 2011.
Saydon Kurtis Burney, Appellant Pro Se. Norval George Metcalf, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Saydon Kurtis Burney appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Burney, No. 3:05-cr-00402-REP-1 (E.D.Va. Apr. 29, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.