Case Name: Orville MEAUX, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORTHWEST AIRLINES, INC., a Delaware corporation; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-07-06
Citations: 441 F. App'x 531
Docket Number: No. 09-17560
Parties: Orville MEAUX, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORTHWEST AIRLINES, INC., a Delaware corporation; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Bankruptcy Reporter
Volume: 461
Pages: 531–531

Head Matter:
Orville MEAUX, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORTHWEST AIRLINES, INC., a Delaware corporation; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 09-17560.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 15, 2011.
Filed July 6, 2011.
Paul J. Steiner, Esquire, Law Offices of Paul J. Steiner, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Lori Ann Bowman, Linda Goldman, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C., Los Angeles, CA, Antonio Ruiz, Weinberg Roger & Rosenfeld, Alameda, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Orville Meaux appeals from the district court's judgment dismissing his complaint against Northwest Airlines, Inc. as barred by the bankruptcy discharge injunction issued in Northwest's bankruptcy proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Meaux does not challenge the district court's order dismissing his complaint against Northwest, and thus has abandoned any challenge to the dismissal. See Cook v. Schriro, 538 F.3d 1000, 1014 n. 5 (9th Cir.2008) (issues not raised on appeal are deemed abandoned).
We do not consider Meaux's contention that the district court should have treated his Railway Labor Act claim against Northwest as an amendment to the complaint in his 2004 action against Northwest, because Meaux did not raise the argument in the district court and consideration is not " 'necessary to prevent a miscarriage of justice or to preserve the integrity of the judicial process.' " Alaska v. United States, 201 F.3d 1154, 1163-64 (9th Cir.2000) (citation omitted).
Meaux's request for judicial notice is granted in part as to Exhibits 1, 2, and 5. The request is otherwise denied.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.