Case Name: William J. Fitzgerald & another, trustees, vs. Boston Redevelopment Authority
Court: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Jurisdiction: Massachusetts
Decision Date: 1970-04-01
Citations: 357 Mass. 766
Docket Number: 
Parties: William J. Fitzgerald & another, trustees, vs. Boston Redevelopment Authority.
Judges: 
Reporter: Massachusetts Reports
Volume: 357
Pages: 766–766

Head Matter:
William J. Fitzgerald & another, trustees, vs. Boston Redevelopment Authority.
April 1, 1970.
James D. St. Clair (Stephen H. Oleshey with him) for the petitioners.
Arthur G. Coffey for the respondent.
Ann P. B. Fitzgerald.

Opinion:
At the trial of a petition for the assessment of damages for the taking of the petitioners' land by eminent domain the jury returned a verdict of $254,000. The locus, consisting of 15,000 square feet, is at 26, 27, and 28 Dock Square, corner of Congress and State streets, Boston. The taking was made on October 25,1961. Following an extended preliminary examination, the judge, subject to the petitioners' exception, admitted testimony of the purchase price paid by the petitioners in 1955 for 12,000 square feet of the locus. When purchased in 1955 the locus was used as a parking lot; when taken in 1961 it was used as a parking lot. The jury took a view, received evidence of changes in the surrounding area and of increases in real estate values, and heard conflicting opinion testimony by experts, who used different methods of evaluation, of the fair market value of the locus. The petitioners contend that the admission of the 1955 purchase price was an abuse of discretion amounting to error of law with the result that the verdict was so grossly inadequate as to require a new trial. We disagree. We reject the petitioners' hypothesis that the verdict was necessarily and exclusively the consequence of the testimony objected to. The case was fully and fairly tried for six days. The evidence was admissible in the discretion of the judge. No error has been shown. H. E. Fletcher Co. v. Commonwealth, 350 Mass. 316. Bartley v. Phillips, 317 Mass. 35.
Exceptions overruled.