Case Name: Dudley WHITFIELD, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2015-12-04
Citations: 178 So. 3d 972
Docket Number: No. 5D15-214
Parties: Dudley WHITFIELD, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SAWAYA, ORFINGER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 178
Pages: 972–972

Head Matter:
Dudley WHITFIELD, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D15-214.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Dec. 4, 2015.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and John M. Selden, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Dudley Whitfield, Jr., Wewahitchka, pro se.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Lori N. ■ Hagan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Ap-pellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Because the trial court lacked jurisdiction when it entered its corrected disposition and sentencing orders while Whitfield's direct appeal was pending, we are compelled to reverse. See Padilla-Padial v. State, 152 So.3d 51, 52 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014); see also Mann-Stack v. Homeside Lending, Inc., 982 So.2d 72, 73-74 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (holding that, once notice of appeal is filed, lower court is divested of jurisdiction to proceed with matters related to appealed order). The trial court is not precluded from reentering the corrected disposition and sentencing orders on remand.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
SAWAYA, ORFINGER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.