Case Name: In re: NEW MIDLAND PLAZA ASSOCIATES, Debtor. Alcoa Calderwood LLC, f.k.a. Coolidge Somerset Alcoa, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, v. New Midland Plaza Associates, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-07-12
Citations: 296 F.3d 1301
Docket Number: No. 01-12025
Parties: In re: NEW MIDLAND PLAZA ASSOCIATES, Debtor. Alcoa Calderwood LLC, f.k.a. Coolidge Somerset Alcoa, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, v. New Midland Plaza Associates, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant.
Judges: Before BIRCH and WILSON, Circuit Judges, and DOWD , District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 296
Pages: 1301–1301

Head Matter:
In re: NEW MIDLAND PLAZA ASSOCIATES, Debtor. Alcoa Calderwood LLC, f.k.a. Coolidge Somerset Alcoa, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, v. New Midland Plaza Associates, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant.
No. 01-12025.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
July 12, 2002.
Peter H. Levitt, Adorno & Zeder, P.A., Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee.
Gary M. Murphree, Ferrell Sheultz, PA, Miami, FL, Michael L. Temin, Wolf, Block, Schorr & Solis, Cohen, LLP, Philadelphia, PA, for Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appel-lant.
Before BIRCH and WILSON, Circuit Judges, and DOWD , District Judge.
Honorable David D. Dowd, Jr., U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
After careful review of the récord and the briefs of the parties in this case, we find no error and AFFIRM the judgment of the district court (which affirmed the ruling of the bankruptcy court), based upon the thorough and well-reasoned opinions of the bankruptcy court (dated 28 February 2000) and the district court (dated 30 March 2001). We deny the appellee/cross appellant's motion to dismiss and deny its cross-appeal:
AFFIRMED.