Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Tiheem Merritt, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2002-11-04
Citations: 299 A.D.2d 370
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tiheem Merritt, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 299
Pages: 370–371

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tiheem Merritt, Appellant.
[749 NYS2d 162]

Opinion:
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Carroll, J.), rendered November 8, 2000, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contentions, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in replacing a sworn juror after making a "reasonably thorough inquiry" (CPL 270.35 [2] [a]) into the juror's unavailability, affording the parties the opportunity to be heard and placing the facts and reasons for its determination on the record (see CPL 270.35.[2] [a], [b]; People v Jeanty, 94 NY2d 507). The Supreme Court reasonably determined that the juror's attendance at his cousin's funeral, burial, and subsequent family gathering in the Bronx, would last substantially more than two hours. Therefore, the discharge of the juror does not warrant reversal (see People v Jeanty, supra; People v Miranda, 223 AD2d 728; People v Jamison, 203 AD2d 385). Altman, J.P., Goldstein, McGinity and Mastro, JJ., concur.