Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DIEP VU HO, a.k.a. Dumbo, a.k.a. Quoc T. Ho, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-05-02
Citations: 425 F. App'x 862
Docket Number: No. 10-13548
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DIEP VU HO, a.k.a. Dumbo, a.k.a. Quoc T. Ho, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 425
Pages: 862–862

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DIEP VU HO, a.k.a. Dumbo, a.k.a. Quoc T. Ho, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-13548.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
May 2, 2011.
Steven E. Butler, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Gloria A. Bedwell, Donna Barrow Dobbins, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Mobile, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Raymond Arthur Pierson, Attorney at Law, Mobile, AL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before BARKETT, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Raymond A. Pierson, appointed counsel for Diep Vu Ho in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issue of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Ho's convictions and sentences are AF FIRMED.