Case Name: Anvarjon ZAKIROV; Fazilatkhon Kasimova; Abrorjon Akhmadjonov, Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General of the United States, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-05-04
Citations: 469 F. App'x 490
Docket Number: No. 11-2544
Parties: Anvarjon ZAKIROV; Fazilatkhon Kasimova; Abrorjon Akhmadjonov, Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General of the United States, Respondent.
Judges: Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 469
Pages: 490–491

Head Matter:
Anvarjon ZAKIROV; Fazilatkhon Kasimova; Abrorjon Akhmadjonov, Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General of the United States, Respondent.
No. 11-2544.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: May 1, 2012.
Filed: May 4, 2012.
Barbara D. Bleisch, Katie Herbert Meyer, Bleisch Law Firm, St. Louis, MO, for Petitioners.
Karen Yolanda Drummond, Allison Frayer, Richard M. Evans, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Uzbekistan citizens Anvarjon Zakirov, his wife Fazilatkhon Kasimova, and their son Abrorjon Akhmadjonov petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying their motion to reconsider an earlier decision. After careful review, we conclude that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners' motion. See Kipkemboi v. Holder, 587 F.3d 885, 890-91 (8th Cir.2009) (standard of review). In addition, we find no merit to petitioners' due process argument. See Banat v. Holder, 557 F.3d 886, 893 (8th Cir.2009) (applicant must show that alleged due process error was prejudicial or had potential for affecting outcome). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.