Case Name: BAYSHORE BOAT CITY, INC., Appellant, v. COCONUT GROVE MARINA, INC., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1970-06-30
Citations: 237 So. 2d 278
Docket Number: Nos. 69-732, 69-722
Parties: BAYSHORE BOAT CITY, INC., Appellant, v. COCONUT GROVE MARINA, INC., Appellee.
Judges: Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 237
Pages: 278–279

Head Matter:
BAYSHORE BOAT CITY, INC., Appellant, v. COCONUT GROVE MARINA, INC., Appellee.
Nos. 69-732, 69-722.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
June 30, 1970.
Rehearing Denied Aug. 5, 1970.
Pozen, Gold & Gold, Miami, for appellant.
Alan Rothstein, Miami, for appellee.
Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellant was the tenant of the ap-pellee. This appeal is from a final judgment entered after a non-jury trial can-celling the lease because of alleged violations of that agreement. The points presented argue that the evidence was insufficient because the violations were of unimportant provisions which would not support the harsh remedy or were violations which were waived by the acceptance of rent. A review of the record convinces us that appellant's arguments are in every case based upon conflicting evidence and that the appellant has not shown either an absence of evidence to support the judgment or that the trial judge misconceived the legal effect of the evidence. E. g., Stephenson v. National Bank, 92 Fla. 347, 109 So. 424 (1926).
Affirmed.