Case Name: E. C. Worrell and H. L. Wiley, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Theodore A. Erck and George H. Erck, Defendants in Error
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1933-02-06
Citations: 108 Fla. 221
Docket Number: 
Parties: E. C. Worrell and H. L. Wiley, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Theodore A. Erck and George H. Erck, Defendants in Error.
Judges: 
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 108
Pages: 221–222

Head Matter:
E. C. Worrell and H. L. Wiley, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Theodore A. Erck and George H. Erck, Defendants in Error.
146 So. 659.
Division B.
Decision filed February 6, 1933.
Frank R. Greene, for Plaintiffs in Error;
F. R. Hocker, for Defendants in Error.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.