Case Name: Feeney Hay Co. Inc. v. Trenton Milling Co. et al.
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1939-10-11
Citations: 189 Ga. 109
Docket Number: No. 13004
Parties: Feeney Hay Co. Inc. v. Trenton Milling Co. et al.
Judges: All the Justices concur.
Reporter: Georgia Reports
Volume: 189
Pages: 109–109

Head Matter:
Feeney Hay Co. Inc. v. Trenton Milling Co. et al.
No. 13004.
October 11, 1939.
A'. A. Baumstarh, Paul Ginsberg, Neely, Marshall & Greene, Bdgcur A. Neely Jr., and C. D. Stewart, contra. t

Opinion:
Grice, Justice.
1. If a petition which undertakes to set out a cause of action for either equitable or legal relief, or both, is sufficient for either relief, it will not be dismissed on a general demurrer, but will proceed for the relief appropriate to such of the allegations and prayers as are sufficient.
2. The petition as amended stated facts sufficient to justify a court in its discretion to grant the extraordinary equitable relief prayed for, to wit, an injunction and receiver. Hermann v. Mobley, 172 Ga. 380 (158 S. E. 38) ; Goodroe v. C. L. C. Thomas Warehouse, 185 Ga. 399 (3), 400 (195 S. E. 199). Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.