Case Name: Randall Keith EAST, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-08-08
Citations: 583 So. 2d 436
Docket Number: No. 91-201
Parties: Randall Keith EAST, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: PETERSON, GRIFFIN and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 583
Pages: 436–437

Head Matter:
Randall Keith EAST, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 91-201.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Aug. 8, 1991.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Daniel J. Schafer, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and David G. Mersch, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm on authority of Walker v. State, 546 So.2d 764 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989) and certify the same question we certified in Flowers v. State, 567 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990):
DO FLORIDA'S UNIFORM SENTENCING GUIDELINES REQUIRE THAT LEGAL CONSTRAINT POINTS BE ASSESSED FOR EACH OFFENSE COMMITTED WHILE UNDER LEGAL CONSTRAINT?
PETERSON, GRIFFIN and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.