Case Name: E. M. WHEATLAND, Appellant, v. JOHN S. BAKER et al., Respondents
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1930-12-06
Citations: 110 Cal. App. 761
Docket Number: Civ. No. 176
Parties: E. M. WHEATLAND, Appellant, v. JOHN S. BAKER et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports
Volume: 110
Pages: 761–761

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 176.
Fourth Appellate District.
December 6, 1930.]
E. M. WHEATLAND, Appellant, v. JOHN S. BAKER et al., Respondents.
R. T. Walters for Appellant.
Forgy, Reinhaus & Forgy for Respondents.

Opinion:
WARMER, J., pro tem.
This is an action in which plaintiff seeks to recover damages for libel. The question presented on this appeal is precisely the same as presented in the case of Wheatland v. Maloney et al., Civil No. 178 (ante, p. 288 [294 Pac. 499]). On the authority of Wheatland v. Maloney this day decided, the judgment is affirmed.
Cary, P. J., and Marks, J., concurred.
A petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on February 2, 1931.
Seawell, J., and Preston, J., dissented.