Case Name: Dainton & Co. v. George W. Bennett and James H. Gilbert
Court: Illinois Appellate Court
Jurisdiction: Illinois
Decision Date: 1896-01-22
Citations: 62 Ill. App. 301
Docket Number: 
Parties: Dainton & Co. v. George W. Bennett and James H. Gilbert.
Judges: 
Reporter: Illinois Appellate Court Reports
Volume: 62
Pages: 301–302

Head Matter:
Dainton & Co. v. George W. Bennett and James H. Gilbert.
1. Verdicts—When Conclusive.—A verdict on conflicting evidence is conclusive.
Replevin.—Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Frank Baker, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1895.
Affirmed.
Opinion filed January 22, 1896.
L. H. Bisbbe & W. H. Gemmill, attorneys for appellant.
Ho appearance for appellees.

Opinion:
Mr. Justice Waterman
delivered the opinion of the Court.
This was an action of replevin, the contest being as to the right to the possession of a stock of groceries, etc.
Only a question of fact was presented. The dispute was as to whether George W. Bennett had delivered possession of the goods to Messrs. Saddler & Orr, to whom he had made a sale; the contest was not, as appellant argues, whether he retained a lien upon goods with the possession of which he had parted. As to whether appellee had given possession of the goods the evidence was contradictory, and the verdict of the jury justifiable.
The judgment of the Circuit Court is therefore affirmed.