Case Name: MELVIN WILCOX, Petitioner, v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1989-05-24
Citations: 96 Or. App. 745
Docket Number: 12-87-190; CA A47360
Parties: MELVIN WILCOX, Petitioner, v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, Respondent.
Judges: Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Newman and Deits, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 96
Pages: 745–746

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted April 26,
fine vacated; otherwise affirmed May 24, 1989
MELVIN WILCOX, Petitioner, v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, Respondent.
(12-87-190; CA A47360)
773 P2d 1365
Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.
Douglas F. Zier, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.
Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Newman and Deits, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Petitioner seeks review of a final order of the Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary that found that he had violated a disciplinary rule and imposed, inter alia, a $50 fine. His contentions that there is not sufficient evidence to support the finding of guilty and that he was denied his right to representation and his right to present evidence at the hearing are wrong. However, respondent concedes, and we agree, that the fine is unlawful. State v. Watson, 90 Or App 85, 750 P2d 1188 (1988).
Fine vacated; otherwise affirmed.