Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gil DAUGHTRY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-12-02
Citations: 51 F. App'x 445
Docket Number: No. 02-7286
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gil DAUGHTRY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 51
Pages: 445–446

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gil DAUGHTRY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-7286.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 21, 2002.
Decided Dec. 2, 2002.
Gil Daughtry, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly A. Riley, Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appel-lee.
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Gil Daughtry seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Daughtry has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See United States v. Daughtry, Nos. CR-00-170-A; CA-01-1786-AM (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 7, 2002; entered Aug. 8, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.