Case Name: Luria STUBBLEFIELD, Cynthia Dartest, Arnette Rochelle, Billy Reaux, Marlene Reaux and Darlene Cox, Individually and on Behalf of Emma Shaw, Deceased v. Jerry W. LINDIG, as Executor of the Succession of Lawrence Lindig, Individually and d/b/a SCC of Houma, LLC, Blake E. McGehee, as Executor of the Succession of Eddie McGehee, Individually and d/b/a SCC of Houma, LLC, Clarence G. Brodhead, Individually and d/b/a SCC of Houma, LLC, SCC of Houma, LLC, d/b/a Southdown Care Center and Does One Through Twenty, Inclusive
Court: Louisiana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 2010-03-05
Citations: 28 So. 3d 1014
Docket Number: No. 2009-C-2273
Parties: Luria STUBBLEFIELD, Cynthia Dartest, Arnette Rochelle, Billy Reaux, Marlene Reaux and Darlene Cox, Individually and on Behalf of Emma Shaw, Deceased v. Jerry W. LINDIG, as Executor of the Succession of Lawrence Lindig, Individually and d/b/a SCC of Houma, LLC, Blake E. McGehee, as Executor of the Succession of Eddie McGehee, Individually and d/b/a SCC of Houma, LLC, Clarence G. Brodhead, Individually and d/b/a SCC of Houma, LLC, SCC of Houma, LLC, d/b/a Southdown Care Center and Does One Through Twenty, Inclusive.
Judges: 
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 28
Pages: 1014–1014

Head Matter:
Luria STUBBLEFIELD, Cynthia Dartest, Arnette Rochelle, Billy Reaux, Marlene Reaux and Darlene Cox, Individually and on Behalf of Emma Shaw, Deceased v. Jerry W. LINDIG, as Executor of the Succession of Lawrence Lindig, Individually and d/b/a SCC of Houma, LLC, Blake E. McGehee, as Executor of the Succession of Eddie McGehee, Individually and d/b/a SCC of Houma, LLC, Clarence G. Brodhead, Individually and d/b/a SCC of Houma, LLC, SCC of Houma, LLC, d/b/a Southdown Care Center and Does One Through Twenty, Inclusive.
No. 2009-C-2273.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
March 5, 2010.

Opinion:
In re Cox, Darlene et al.; Dartest, Cynthia; Reaux, Billy; Reaux, Marlene; Rochelle, Amette; Stubblefield, Luria — Plaintiffs; Applying for Reconsideration of this Court's action dated January 8, 2010; Parish of Terrebonne, 32nd Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 138217; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2008 CA 2362.
Not considered. See Supreme Court Rule IX, Section 6.