Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julio Roberto CASTELLANOS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-10-21
Citations: 48 F. App'x 100
Docket Number: No. 02-7213
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julio Roberto CASTELLANOS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 48
Pages: 100–101

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julio Roberto CASTELLANOS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-7213.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 10, 2002.
Decided Oct. 21, 2002.
Julio Roberto Castellanos, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph William Hooge Mott, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Julio Roberto Castellanos seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court's memorandum opinion and conclude on the reasoning of the district court that Castellanos has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See United States v. Castellanos, Nos. CR-91-82; CA-01-571-7 (W.D.Va. June 5, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.