Case Name: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, and International Union, United Automobile Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (U.A.W.), AFL-CIO, Intervenor, v. GENERAL AUTOMATION MFG., INC., Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1969-04-18
Citations: 408 F.2d 380
Docket Number: No. 18696
Parties: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, and International Union, United Automobile Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (U.A.W.), AFL-CIO, Intervenor, v. GENERAL AUTOMATION MFG., INC., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 408
Pages: 380–380

Head Matter:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, and International Union, United Automobile Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (U.A.W.), AFL-CIO, Intervenor, v. GENERAL AUTOMATION MFG., INC., Respondent.
No. 18696.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
April 18, 1969.
Ronald Wm. Egnor, N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Paul J. Spielberg, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., on brief, for petitioner.
Edward J. Simerka, Cleveland, Ohio, V. Jay Einhart, Carl H. Clark, Stanley, Smoyer & Schwartz, Cleveland, Ohio, George B. Wells, Detroit, Mich., on brief, for respondent.
Jordan Rossen, Detroit, Mich., Stephen I. Sehlossberg, John A. Fillion, Bernard F. Ashe, Stanley Lubin, Detroit, Mich., on brief, for intervenor.
Before CELEBREZZE and PECK, Circuit Judges, and GORDON , District Judge.
Honorable James F. Gordon, United States District Judge for the Western District of Kentucky, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
ORDER.
This cause came on to be heard upon the record on appeal and the briefs and arguments of counsel, and upon due consideration thereof and of the factual situation as set out in the record and the report of the case, 167 N.L.R.B. No. 66, it appears to the Court that the findings and order of the Board are supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole.
Now, therefore, it is ordered that the order of the Board be, and it is, hereby enforced.