Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Bedios OVALLE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-02-23
Citations: 88 F. App'x 609
Docket Number: No. 03-7926
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Juan Bedios OVALLE, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 88
Pages: 609–610

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Juan Bedios OVALLE, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 03-7926.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 12, 2004.
Decided Feb. 23, 2004.
Juan Bedios Ovalle, Appellant pro se. Janice McKenzie Cole, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Juan Bedios Ovalle appeals the district court's order denying his motion for correction of sentence under Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Ovalle, No. CR-01-130-F (E.D.N.C. Nov. 20, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED