Case Name: Mary Fraser, respondent, v. James K. Fraser, appellant
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1911-03-06
Citations: 78 N.J. Eq. 296
Docket Number: 
Parties: Mary Fraser, respondent, v. James K. Fraser, appellant.
Judges: For affirmance — Ti-ie Ci-iiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reed, Trenchabd, Parker, Bergen, Voori-iees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgii, Congdon, Sullivan — -13.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 78
Pages: 296–296

Head Matter:
Mary Fraser, respondent, v. James K. Fraser, appellant.
[Submitted November 23d, 1910.
Decided March 6th, 1911.]
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Walker, whose opinion is reported in 77 N. J. Eq. (7 Buch.) 206.
Messrs. Roberson & Demurest, for the respondent.
Mr. Scott Scammell, for the appellant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Walker.
For affirmance — Ti-ie Ci-iiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reed, Trenchabd, Parker, Bergen, Voori-iees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgii, Congdon, Sullivan — -13.
For reversal — None.