Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Tarrell WHITFIELD, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1994-12-20
Citations: 891 S.W.2d 527
Docket Number: No. 61849
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Tarrell WHITFIELD, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before GRIMM, C.J., REINHARD, P.J., and CRAHAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 891
Pages: 527–527

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Tarrell WHITFIELD, Defendant/Appellant.
No. 61849.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Dec. 20, 1994.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 81, 1995.
Deborah B. Wafer, Dist. Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Millie Aulbur, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before GRIMM, C.J., REINHARD, P.J., and CRAHAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury for second degree burglary, § 569.170, RSMo 1986. He was sentenced by the court as a prior, persistent and class X offender to a twenty year prison term. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for them information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).