Case Name: Clarence E. BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LANCER INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1963-11-08
Citations: 324 F.2d 286
Docket Number: No. 161, Docket 28425
Parties: Clarence E. BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LANCER INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 324
Pages: 286–287

Head Matter:
Clarence E. BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LANCER INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 161, Docket 28425.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued Nov. 8, 1963.
Decided Nov. 8, 1963.
Grossman & Grossman, New York City (Louis Grossman, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant.
Levy & Nevins, New York City (Saul S. Nevins, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellee.
Before WATERMAN, MOORE and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant's complaint seeks recovery upon three separate causes of action, and he seeks review of an order entered in United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York denying his motion for summary judgment for the full amount of damages claimed in his first cause of action, or, in the alternative, for partial summary judgment thereon for a lesser amount.
In open court on our own motion we dismiss the appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction.