Case Name: People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John Pavlisak and William Jones, Appellants
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1944-01-20
Citations: 292 N.Y. 504
Docket Number: 
Parties: People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John Pavlisak and William Jones, Appellants.
Judges: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Lewis, Desmond and Thacher, JJ., concur; Conway, J., dissents in the following memorandum in which Rippey, J., concurs:
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 292
Pages: 504–505

Head Matter:
People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John Pavlisak and William Jones, Appellants.
Argued October 20, 1943;
decided January 20, 1944.
Harry 8. Travis for John Pavlisak, appellant.
Alec Rosefsky for William Jones, appellant.
Robert 0. Brink, District Attorney, for respondent.

Opinion:
The judgments should be affirmed on the ground that there was no prejudicial error in the charge as to reasonable doubt when read in its entirety or in any other rulings of the trial court to which exceptions were taken. We may not consider rulings to which no exceptions were taken. (People v. Cummins, 209 N. Y. 283; People v. Pindar, 210 N. Y. 191.)
Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Lewis, Desmond and Thacher, JJ., concur; Conway, J., dissents in the following memorandum in which Rippey, J., concurs: