Case Name: Luie HOLLAND and Joann Holland, husband and wife, Appellants, v. GOLDCO, INC., an Alabama corporation, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-09-21
Citations: 549 So. 2d 719
Docket Number: No. 88-2623
Parties: Luie HOLLAND and Joann Holland, husband and wife, Appellants, v. GOLDCO, INC., an Alabama corporation, Appellee.
Judges: SMITH, THOMPSON and MINER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 549
Pages: 719–720

Head Matter:
Luie HOLLAND and Joann Holland, husband and wife, Appellants, v. GOLDCO, INC., an Alabama corporation, Appellee.
No. 88-2623.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Sept. 21, 1989.
Rehearing Denied Oct. 26, 1989.
Kerrigan, Estess & Rankin, Pensacola, Joel S. Perwin of Podhurst, Orseck, Josefs-berg, Eaton, Meadow, Olin & Perwin, P.A., Miami, for appellants.
Richard M. Denney, Fort Walton Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellants, the plaintiffs in a personal injury suit arising out of a slip and fall accident, appeal an adverse final summary judgment entered in favor of appellee. We reverse the final summary judgment on the grounds that genuine issues of material fact exist as to whether appellee provided adequate warning to the plaintiff, Luie Holland, to apprise him of the wet condition of the restaurant floor. Wills v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 351 So.2d 29 (Fla. 1977).
REVERSED.
SMITH, THOMPSON and MINER, JJ., concur.