Case Name: STATE ex rel. W. A. YOUNG et al., Respondents, v. H. A. BENNETT et al., etc., Appellants
Court: St. Louis Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1903-03-31
Citations: 101 Mo. App. 224
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE ex rel. W. A. YOUNG et al., Respondents, v. H. A. BENNETT et al., etc., Appellants.
Judges: Bland, P. J., and Goode, J.f concur.
Reporter: Missouri Appeal Reports
Volume: 101
Pages: 224–224

Head Matter:
STATE ex rel. W. A. YOUNG et al., Respondents, v. H. A. BENNETT et al., etc., Appellants.
St. Louis Court of Appeals,
March 31, 1903.
Dramshop: LICENSE, VOID. This ease involves same material questions as decided in case of State ex rel. v. Bennett et al., 102 Mo. App. 247.
Appeal from Dent Circuit Court. — Hon. L. B. Wood-side, Judge.
Affirmed.

Opinion:
REYBURN, J.
With unimportant differences in minor details, this case presents the same questions as those passed upon in State ex rel. J. J. Cope et al. v. H. A. Bennett et al., etc., 102 Mo. App. 247, and, in fact, both cases were argued and submitted at the same time. For the reasons therein given the order of the county court granting to Peter Brock and S. D. Hendricks a dramshop license was without authority in law and void, and the judgment of the circuit court annulling the order of the county court in granting such license is hereby affirmed.
Bland, P. J., and Goode, J.f concur.