Case Name: James E. BOWZER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2007-04-10
Citations: 219 S.W.3d 783
Docket Number: No. ED 87615
Parties: James E. BOWZER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J. and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 219
Pages: 783–783

Head Matter:
James E. BOWZER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 87615.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
April 10, 2007.
Scott Thompson, Public Defender, Saint Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Daniel N. McPherson, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J. and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
James Bowzer appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).