Case Name: Edward Cheeseman ROBERTS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee
Court: District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Decision Date: 2000-06-01
Citations: 752 A.2d 583
Docket Number: No. 96-CF-1092
Parties: Edward Cheeseman ROBERTS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee.
Judges: Before WAGNER, Chief Judge, and TERRY, STEADMAN, SCHWELB, FARRELL, RUIZ, REID, GLICKMAN, and WASHINGTON, Associate Judges.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 752
Pages: 583–594

Head Matter:
Edward Cheeseman ROBERTS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee.
No. 96-CF-1092.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
June 1, 2000.
Jaelyn S. Frankfurt, Public Defender Service, with whom James Klein, Public Defender Service, was on the brief, for appellant.
Stephen J. Gripkey, Assistant United States Attorney, with whom Wilma A. Lewis, United States Attorney, and John R. Fisher and Rachel Adelman-Pierson, Assistant United States Attorneys, were on the brief, for appellee.
Before WAGNER, Chief Judge, and TERRY, STEADMAN, SCHWELB, FARRELL, RUIZ, REID, GLICKMAN, and WASHINGTON, Associate Judges.
Associate Judge Ruiz has issued a separate concurring opinion.

Opinion:
Before STEADMAN, SCHWELB, and RUIZ, Associate Judges.
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
In consideration of the opinion by the court in Roberts v. United States, 743 A.2d 212 (D.C.1999) (Roberts I), the appellant's petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, the appellee's opposition to the petition, and the record herein, it is now hereby
ORDERED by the merits division that the petition for rehearing is granted in part and that the opinion in Roberts I is modified as reflected in the division opinion on rehearing issued this date (Roberts II); and the petition for rehearing, in all other respects, is denied. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for rehearing en banc is denied, without prejudice to the filing of a new petition addressed to the division's decision on rehearing.