Case Name: JOHN McNALLY, RESPONDENT, v. HUDSON AND MANHATTAN RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1916-03-06
Citations: 88 N.J.L. 729
Docket Number: 
Parties: JOHN McNALLY, RESPONDENT, v. HUDSON AND MANHATTAN RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 88
Pages: 729–730

Head Matter:
JOHN McNALLY, RESPONDENT, v. HUDSON AND MANHATTAN RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT.
Argued November 26, 1915
Decided March 6, 1916.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 87 N. J. L. 455.
For the appellant, Walter L. Glenney.
For the respondent, Richard Doherty.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Kaliseh in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance—The Chief Justice, Gabeison, Teenchabd, Beegen, Mintubn, Black, Teehune, Heppeftiieimek, Williams, Tayloe, JJ. 10.
For reversal—None.