Case Name: Kenny HALFACRE, Appellant, v. David CRUSETURNER, Assistant Director, Arkansas Department of Correction; Larry May, Assistant Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-11-17
Citations: 299 F. App'x 609
Docket Number: No. 07-3489
Parties: Kenny HALFACRE, Appellant, v. David CRUSETURNER, Assistant Director, Arkansas Department of Correction; Larry May, Assistant Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Appellees.
Judges: Before WOLLMAN, SMITH, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 299
Pages: 609–610

Head Matter:
Kenny HALFACRE, Appellant, v. David CRUSETURNER, Assistant Director, Arkansas Department of Correction; Larry May, Assistant Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Appellees.
No. 07-3489.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 7, 2008.
Filed: Nov. 17, 2008.
Kenny Halfacre, Dermott, AR, pro se.
Warden, Arkansas Department of Correction, Dermott, AR, for Appellant.
Christine Ann Boozer, Acting, Brittany Leah McCollum, Attorney General’s Office, Little Rock, AR, for Appellees.
Before WOLLMAN, SMITH, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Arkansas inmate Kenny Halfacre appeals the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action following two pretrial evidentiary hearings. Upon careful review, see Choate v. Lockhart, 7 F.3d 1370, 1373 & n. 1 (8th Cir.1993) (standard of review for pretrial evidentiary hearing without jury demand), we agree with the district court that Halfacre failed to show that defendants took adverse action against him in retaliation for engaging in constitutionally protected activities. See Sisneros v. Nix, 95 F.3d 749, 752 (8th Cir.1996) (inmate claiming retaliation is required to meet substantial burden of proving actual motivating factor for adverse action was as alleged); Atkinson v. Bohn, 91 F.3d 1127, 1129 (8th Cir.1996) (per curiam) (allegations of retaliation must be more than speculative and conclusory); Martin v. Sargent, 780 F.2d 1334, 1338 (8th Cir.1985) (to be liable, defendant in § 1983 action must have been personally involved in or directly responsible for conduct that caused injury). We reject Halfacre's remaining arguments. See Estate of Davis v. Delo, 115 F.3d 1388, 1393-94 (8th Cir.1997) (credibility determinations are within province of trier of fact); Williams v. Carter, 10 F.3d 563, 566 (8th Cir.1993) (decision whether to issue subpoena is discretionary).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable H. David Young, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.