Case Name: Crow et al. v. California Department of Human Resources Development et al.
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1975-02-18
Citations: 420 U.S. 917
Docket Number: No. 73-1015
Parties: Crow et al. v. California Department of Human Resources Development et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 420
Pages: 917–917

Head Matter:
No. 73-1015.
Crow et al. v. California Department of Human Resources Development et al.

Opinion:
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded with directions to consider question of mootness in light of Sosna v. Iowa, 419 U. S. 393 (1975), and Indiana Employment Security Division v. Burney, 409 U. S. 540 (1973). See United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U. S. 36 (1950). If the court determines that the case is not moot, it should consider whether a three-judge court is required. See Hagans v. Lavine, 415 U. S. 528, 543-545 (1974); Fusari v. Steinberg, 419 U. S. 379 (1975); cf. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. Epstein, 370 U. S. 713, 716 (1962). Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
See also note, supra, p. 914.