Case Name: James H. LARSEN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Randall WRIGHT, Defendant and Appellee
Court: Utah Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Utah
Decision Date: 2012-01-06
Citations: 268 P.3d 890
Docket Number: No. 20110770-CA
Parties: James H. LARSEN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Randall WRIGHT, Defendant and Appellee.
Judges: Before Judges MeHUGH, THORNE, and CHRISTIANSEN.
Reporter: Pacific Reporter 3d
Volume: 268
Pages: 890–891

Head Matter:
2012 UT App 9
James H. LARSEN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Randall WRIGHT, Defendant and Appellee.
No. 20110770-CA.
Court of Appeals of Utah.
Jan. 6, 2012.
James H. Larsen, Provo, Appellant Pro Se.
Peter C. Schofield, Orem, for Appellee.
Before Judges MeHUGH, THORNE, and CHRISTIANSEN.

Opinion:
DECISION
PER CURIAM:
11 James H. Larsen appeals the trial court's order dismissing his complaint. This is before the court on its own motion for summary disposition based on the lack of a substantial question for review. Larsen failed to respond to the motion. As a result of his failure to respond and the lack of a viable legal issue identified in his docketing statement, he has failed to identify a substantial question for review warranting further consideration by this court. See Utah R.App. P. 10. Absent a substantial issue for review, this court may summarily affirm a district court's order.
{ 2 Affirmed.