Case Name: Craig M. PERKINS, Petitioner/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2008-04-29
Citations: 251 S.W.3d 378
Docket Number: No. ED 89597
Parties: Craig M. PERKINS, Petitioner/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 251
Pages: 378–378

Head Matter:
Craig M. PERKINS, Petitioner/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 89597.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
April 29, 2008.
Michelle Murphy Rivera, Saint Louis, MO, for petitioner/appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent/respondent.
Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Craig M. Perkins (Appellant) appeals from the motion court's denial without an evidentiary hearing of his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 24.035. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2003, unless otherwise indicated.