Case Name: Donald ARCHAMBAULT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2001-06-29
Citations: 789 So. 2d 463
Docket Number: No. 5D00-1852
Parties: Donald ARCHAMBAULT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: THOMPSON, C.J., and ORFINGER, R.B., J., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 789
Pages: 463–464

Head Matter:
Donald ARCHAMBAULT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D00-1852.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
June 29, 2001.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Lyle Hitchens, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Roark Wall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

Opinion:
SHARP, W., J,
We affirm Archambault's sentences which were imposed following revocation of his probation. The commission of new criminal offenses by Archambault while on probation is sufficient to revoke that probation. See Norton v. State, 691 So.2d 616 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 698 So.2d 1225 (Fla.1997); Singleton v. State, 633 So.2d 529 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Scherer v. State, 366 So.2d 840 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). In addition, Archambault is not entitled to credit for time spent in jail on unrelated charges. See Sheehan v. State, 759 So.2d 747 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000); Hopping v. State, 650 So.2d 1087 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995).
AFFIRMED.
THOMPSON, C.J., and ORFINGER, R.B., J., concur.