Case Name: IN RE: Calvin WINBUSH, a/k/a Good Game, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-02-16
Citations: 676 F. App'x 207
Docket Number: No. 16-7253
Parties: IN RE: Calvin WINBUSH, a/k/a Good Game, Petitioner.
Judges: Before KEENAN, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 676
Pages: 207–207

Head Matter:
IN RE: Calvin WINBUSH, a/k/a Good Game, Petitioner.
No. 16-7253
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: February 7, 2017
Decided: February 16, 2017
Calvin Winbush, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before KEENAN, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Calvin Winbush petitions for a 'writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court's docket reveals that the district court ruled on the § 2255 motion, denying it and declining to grant a certifícate of appealability. See United States v. Winbush, No. 3:12-cr-00021-HEH-RCY-1, 2016 WL 5329602 (E.D. Va. Sept. 21, 2016). Winbush's appeal of that order is pending in this court. See United States v. Winbush, No. 16-7527 (4th Cir.) (docketed Nov. 2, 2016). Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Winbush's case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pau-peris. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED