Case Name: Anthony H. BARKATE, Petitioner, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-04-11
Citations: 125 F. App'x 892
Docket Number: No. 04-72839; SEC No. 3-11250
Parties: Anthony H. BARKATE, Petitioner, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Respondent.
Judges: Before B. FLETCHER, TROTT, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 125
Pages: 892–892

Head Matter:
Anthony H. BARKATE, Petitioner, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Respondent.
No. 04-72839.
SEC No. 3-11250.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 23, 2005.
Decided April 11, 2005.
Anthony H. Barkate, Bakersfield, CA, pro se.
Jonathan G. Katz, Esq., Securities & Exchange Commission, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before B. FLETCHER, TROTT, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Anthony H. Barkate, a former securities salesperson, petitions pro se for review of the Securities and Exchange Commission's ("SEC") order sustaining a disciplinary decision of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. ("NASD") barring Barkate from association with any NASD member brokerage firm. We have jurisdiction under 15 U.S.C. § 78y(a). We review the SEC's affirmance of the NASD's imposition of sanctions for abuse of discretion, McNabb v. SEC, 298 F.3d 1126, 1133 (9th Cir.2002), and the SEC's factual findings for substantial evidence, Eichler v. SEC, 757 F.2d 1066, 1069 (9th Cir.1985). We deny the petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the SEC's findings that Barkate violated NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040, that he did not submit an outside business activity disclosure form prior to the date upon which he started selling tax lien certificates outside the scope of his regular employment, and that he could not have reasonably believed that these certificates were not securities. See McNabb, 298 F.3d at 1133.
The SEC did not abuse its discretion when it sustained the sanction, because it determined that Barkate failed to demonstrate mitigating factors for his conduct and the sanction was within the Sanction Guidelines for violation of NASD Conduct Rules 2110 and 3040. See id.
Barkate's remaining contentions are also without merit.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.