Case Name: James T. HOOTEN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF HONDO; et al., Defendants, Andy Chernak; Don Berger, Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-08-08
Citations: 140 F. App'x 555
Docket Number: No. 04-51072
Parties: James T. HOOTEN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF HONDO; et al., Defendants, Andy Chernak; Don Berger, Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 140
Pages: 555–555

Head Matter:
James T. HOOTEN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF HONDO; et al., Defendants, Andy Chernak; Don Berger, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 04-51072.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 8, 2005.
Paul G. Vick, Law Office of Paul G. Vick, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Charles Straith Frigerio, Hector X. Saenz, Law Offices of Charles S. Frigerio, San Antonio, TX, for Defendants-Appellants.
Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
After a study of the briefs and record and after oral argument, we are convinced in this very close case that the district court committed no reversible error in denying qualified immunity in the light of the factual disputes that remain. Accordingly, the appeal is
DISMISSED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.