Case Name: Clarence F. Kaltenbach, Respondent, v. Anna Benisch, Peter Haslinger, Fred Keiser and Benisch Bros., Inc., Appellants, and Katherine Haslinger, Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1937-10-29
Citations: 252 A.D. 788
Docket Number: 
Parties: Clarence F. Kaltenbach, Respondent, v. Anna Benisch, Peter Haslinger, Fred Keiser and Benisch Bros., Inc., Appellants, and Katherine Haslinger, Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 252
Pages: 788–790

Head Matter:
(October 29,1937.)
Clarence F. Kaltenbach, Respondent, v. Anna Benisch, Peter Haslinger, Fred Keiser and Benisch Bros., Inc., Appellants, and Katherine Haslinger, Defendant.

Opinion:
Order restraining, pendente lite, the unauthorized operation of a gasoline station affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The granting of the restraining order was not an abuse of discretion. (Rice v. Van Vranken, 132 Misc. 82; affd., 225 App. Div. 179; affd., 255 N. Y. 541; Cohen v. Rosevale Realty Co., Inc., 120 Misc. 416; affd., 206 App. Div. 681.)
Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur; Hagarty, J., dissents, with opinion.