Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Barney Joe DONALSON, Jr., also known as Damon Downs, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-08-20
Citations: 72 F. App'x 200
Docket Number: No. 03-20151
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Barney Joe DONALSON, Jr., also known as Damon Downs, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 72
Pages: 200–200

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Barney Joe DONALSON, Jr., also known as Damon Downs, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 03-20151
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 20, 2003.
Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Barney Joe Donalson, Jr., a/k/a Damon Downs, ("Donalson"), Texas prisoner # 423754, appeals the district court's denial of his Fed. R.Ceim. P. 36 motion to correct his judgment of conviction for clerical error. In June 1995, this court sanctioned Donalson, who then used the name Damon Henry Downs, stating:
Downs may file no initial pleading in this court or in any court subject to the jurisdiction of this court, except with the advance written permission of a judge of the forum court. Before filing any appeal or other action in this court, Downs shall submit to the clerk of this court a request for permission to file, together with the document that he proposes to file, which the clerk shall direct to an active judge of this court. In requesting the required permission in this court or in any court in this circuit, Downs shall inform the court of the bar stated herein.
In re Downs, No. 95-50282 (5th Cir. June 27, 1995) (unpublished). Donalson did not seek the permission specified in the foregoing opinion prior to filing the appeal of the district court's order. Accordingly, we dismiss the instant appeal as having been filed improvidently.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.