Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Brent HUGHES, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-04-21
Citations: 95 F. App'x 671
Docket Number: No. 03-50889
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Brent HUGHES, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 95
Pages: 671–672

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Brent HUGHES, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 03-50889.
Conference Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
DECIDED: April 21, 2004.
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant US Attorney, US Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Lucien B. Campbell, Federal Public Defender, Donna F. Coltharp, Federal Public Defender’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Brent Hughes appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of sexual abuse of a minor in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2243(a). Hughes argues that under the reasoning of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), a fact must be alleged in the indictment before it may be used to increase the maximum guideline sentence. Hughes acknowledges that his contention is foreclosed by this court's decision in United States v. Randle, 304 F.3d 373 (5th Cir.2002), but he seeks to preserve his argument for possible further review.
The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee's brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee's brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.