Case Name: Jindrich WALDES, Ignatz Puc, Edward Merzinger and Sigmund Waldes, Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Waldes & Co., Plaintiffs Appellants, v. William SCHALL and Carl Muller, Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Muller, Schall & Co., Defendants Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1926-01-15
Citations: 11 F.2d 453
Docket Number: No. 12
Parties: Jindrich WALDES, Ignatz Puc, Edward Merzinger and Sigmund Waldes, Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Waldes & Co., Plaintiffs Appellants, v. William SCHALL and Carl Muller, Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Muller, Schall & Co., Defendants Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 11
Pages: 453–453

Head Matter:
Jindrich WALDES, Ignatz Puc, Edward Merzinger and Sigmund Waldes, Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Waldes & Co., Plaintiffs Appellants, v. William SCHALL and Carl Muller, Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Muller, Schall & Co., Defendants Appellees.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Decided January 15, 1926.)
No. 12.
Burnstine & Geist, of New York City (Julius M. Mayer, Henry C. Burnstine, and Frederick P. Warfield, all of New York City, of counsel), for appellants.
Avery & Whiting, of New York City (Jay E. Whiting and Earl B. Barnes, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellees,
HOUGH, MANTON and HAND, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We are entirely satisfied with the findings of fact made by the master. They dispose of the ease, and decree [11 F.(2d) 444] is affirmed, with costs, on the master's opimon.