Case Name: Jaime MIRELEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-01-25
Citations: 804 So. 2d 622
Docket Number: No. 5D01-2263
Parties: Jaime MIRELEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: PETERSON, GRIFFIN and PLEUS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 804
Pages: 622–622

Head Matter:
Jaime MIRELEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D01-2263.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Jan. 25, 2002.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Ann Moorman Reeves, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
No Appearance for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the conviction but remand to the trial court to correct an inconsistency between the orally pronounced sentence and the written sentence as to Count XIV. The trial court orally pronounced a five year sentence while the written sentence imposed a prison term of 15 years for this count. The error is clear and its correction does not change the aggregate sentence appellant received.
Therefore, the appellant's conviction is affirmed and the matter is remanded for correction of the sentence as to Count XIV.
AFFIRMED; REMANDED FOR CORRECTION OF SENTENCE.
PETERSON, GRIFFIN and PLEUS, JJ., concur.