Case Name: COPELCO CAPITAL, INC., Plaintiff, v. GENERAL CONSUL OF BOLIVIA, etc., Defendant
Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1996-10-25
Citations: 960 F. Supp. 42
Docket Number: 96 Civil 4565(LAK)
Parties: COPELCO CAPITAL, INC., Plaintiff, v. GENERAL CONSUL OF BOLIVIA, etc., Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Supplement
Volume: 960
Pages: 42–43

Head Matter:
COPELCO CAPITAL, INC., Plaintiff, v. GENERAL CONSUL OF BOLIVIA, etc., Defendant.
96 Civil 4565(LAK).
United States District Court, S.D. New York.
Oct. 25, 1996.

Opinion:
ORDER
KAPLAN, District Judge.
Although the Court disagrees with plaintiffs construction of the relevant portion of the contract, there was a sufficient basis for counsel's actions so that sanctions will not be imposed. Counsel would have been better advised to have quoted the language of the contract in full and to have made his argument. By failing to do so, he inadvertently created an unfortunate impression.
The order to show cause, contained in the Court's October 8, 1996 memorandum opinion, is discharged.
SO ORDERED.