Case Name: Edith CURRY v. FRANKLIN ELECTRIC
Court: Arkansas Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Arkansas
Decision Date: 1990-02-07
Citations: 30 Ark. App. 139
Docket Number: CA 89-440
Parties: Edith CURRY v. FRANKLIN ELECTRIC
Judges: Mayfield, J., concurs.
Reporter: Arkansas Appellate Reports
Volume: 30
Pages: 139–141

Head Matter:
Edith CURRY v. FRANKLIN ELECTRIC
CA 89-440
783 S.W.2d 76
Court of Appeals of Arkansas En Banc
Opinion delivered February 7, 1990
Zan Davis, for appellant.
Michael W. Alexander, for appellee.
Youngdahl & Youngdahl, P.A., by: Thomas H. McGowan, for amicus curiae Arkansas AFL-CIO.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The Arkansas AFL-CIO has filed a motion for permission to file an amicus curiae brief in the above styled case. Rule 19 of the Rules of the Arkansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals provides that a motion to file an amicus curiae brief should state the reasons why such a brief is thought to be necessary. Because the AFL-CIO motion filed in the instant case does not conform to the above stated requirement of Rule 19, the motion is denied.
Mayfield, J., concurs.
Jennings, J., dissents.