Case Name: Fernando J. DIFILIPPO, and Francesca G. Difilippo by and through Fernando Difilippo, Jr., their father and natural guardian, and Fernando Difilippo, Jr., Appellants, v. Wanda RAYLE, f/k/a Wanda Difilippo, and George C. Vogelsang, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-03-06
Citations: 669 So. 2d 306
Docket Number: No. 95-1492
Parties: Fernando J. DIFILIPPO, and Francesca G. Difilippo by and through Fernando Difilippo, Jr., their father and natural guardian, and Fernando Difilippo, Jr., Appellants, v. Wanda RAYLE, f/k/a Wanda Difilippo, and George C. Vogelsang, Appellees.
Judges: Before JORGENSON, LEVY and GREEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 669
Pages: 306–307

Head Matter:
Fernando J. DIFILIPPO, and Francesca G. Difilippo by and through Fernando Difilippo, Jr., their father and natural guardian, and Fernando Difilippo, Jr., Appellants, v. Wanda RAYLE, f/k/a Wanda Difilippo, and George C. Vogelsang, Appellees.
No. 95-1492.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 6, 1996.
Donnal S. Mixon, Miami, for appellants.
Beth Tyler Vogelsang, Miami, for appel-lees.
Before JORGENSON, LEVY and GREEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The record reflects that the matters raised in the instant lawsuit relate to two other cases that were settled and closed more than one year before the instant action was commenced. In view of the fact that the matters raised by appellants in the instant lawsuit are intrinsic, rather than extrinsic, the trial court was correct in entering its order of dismissal. See Cerniglia v. Cerniglia, 655 So.2d 172 (Fla. 3d DCA), review granted, 662 So.2d 931 (Fla.1995); Langer v. hanger, 463 So.2d 429 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).
Affirmed.