Case Name: DUMAS v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1932-02-03
Citations: 47 S.W.2d 294
Docket Number: 
Parties: DUMAS v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 47
Pages: 294–294

Head Matter:
DUMAS v. STATE.
No. 14959.
Court of Crimianl Appeals of Texas.
Feb. 3, 1932.
Rehearing Denied March 23,1932.
A. M. Felts and Wright Stubbs, both of Austin, for appellant.
Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
CHRISTIAN, J.
The offense is transporting intoxicating liquor; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.
The record is before us without a statement of facts, or bills of exception. No question is presented for review.
In imposing sentence the court failed to make application of the provisions of the Intermediate Sentence Law (Vernon's Ann. Civ. St.,, art. 775). The sentence is reformed to show that appellant is condemned to confinement in the penitentiary for not less than one nor more than two years.
As reformed, the judgment is affirmed.
PER CURIAM.
The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.