Case Name: STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Jack HUMPHREY, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-04-18
Citations: 559 So. 2d 733
Docket Number: No. 89-00489
Parties: STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Jack HUMPHREY, Appellee.
Judges: SCHEB, A.C.J., and FRANK and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 559
Pages: 733–733

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Jack HUMPHREY, Appellee.
No. 89-00489.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
April 18, 1990.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Peggy A. Quince, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellant.
No appearance for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The State of Florida appeals the dismissal of an information against the appellee, Jack Humphrey. Humphrey was charged with violating section 847.011, Florida Statutes (1987), by possessing or distributing obscene materials. The trial court found the statutory definition of obscenity unconstitutionally vague and the statute a violation of the right of privacy guaranteed by the Florida Constitution. We reverse.
The order of dismissal was entered on December 15, 1988. This court subsequently upheld the constitutionality of section 847.011, on both grounds raised in this appeal in State v. Long, 544 So.2d 219 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989), jurisdiction accepted Long v. State, 550 So.2d 467 (Fla.1989). Accordingly, the dismissal in this case is reversed.
SCHEB, A.C.J., and FRANK and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.