Case Name: In re the MARRIAGE OF Terry BROWN and Elizabeth Brown. Terry Brown, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Elizabeth Brown, Respondent/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2007-02-20
Citations: 218 S.W.3d 2
Docket Number: No. ED 88026
Parties: In re the MARRIAGE OF Terry BROWN and Elizabeth Brown. Terry Brown, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Elizabeth Brown, Respondent/Appellant.
Judges: Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 218
Pages: 2–2

Head Matter:
In re the MARRIAGE OF Terry BROWN and Elizabeth Brown. Terry Brown, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Elizabeth Brown, Respondent/Appellant.
No. ED 88026.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Feb. 20, 2007.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 29, 2007.
Mark R. Harford, Hilton & Harford, L.L.C., St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Frank J. Niesen, III, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a decree of dissolution of marriage. The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).