Case Name: Robert MOORE, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants; Cross-Appellees, v. MENASHA CORPORATION., Defendant-Appellee; Cross-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-08-22
Citations: 476 F. App'x 77
Docket Number: Nos. 11-1422, 11-1423
Parties: Robert MOORE, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants; Cross-Appellees, v. MENASHA CORPORATION., Defendant-Appellee; Cross-Appellant.
Judges: BEFORE: CLAY and KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judges; DOW, District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 476
Pages: 77–78

Head Matter:
Robert MOORE, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants; Cross-Appellees, v. MENASHA CORPORATION., Defendant-Appellee; Cross-Appellant.
Nos. 11-1422, 11-1423.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Aug. 22, 2012.
BEFORE: CLAY and KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judges; DOW, District Judge.
The Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr., United States District Judge for the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this companion case to Case Nos. 10-2171; 10-2173, the parties cross-appeal a decision by the district court awarding attorney's fees and costs in the amount of $125,000 to Plaintiffs and $45,000 to Defen dant in relation to Plaintiffs' action alleging that Defendant violated Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA), 29 U.S.C. § 185, and Section 502(a)(1)(B) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1132. See Moore v. Menasha Corp., No. l:08-cv-1167, 2011 WL 811150, at *1 (W.D.Mich. March 1, 2011).
In light of our opinion reversing the district court's judgment in Nos. 10-2171 and 10-2173, we also hereby VACATE the district court's determination of fees and costs in Nos. 11-1422 and 11-1423 and REMAND for further proceedings consistent with our disposition of Nos. 10-2171 and 10-2173.