Case Name: Glenn V. RHODES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patrick CONROY, Warden; Attorney General for the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-02-15
Citations: 3 F. App'x 129
Docket Number: No. 00-7445
Parties: Glenn V. RHODES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patrick CONROY, Warden; Attorney General for the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 3
Pages: 129–129

Head Matter:
Glenn V. RHODES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patrick CONROY, Warden; Attorney General for the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 00-7445.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 16, 2001.
Decided Feb. 15, 2001.
Glenn V. Rhodes, pro se.
John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Mary Ann Rapp Ince, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, for appellees.
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Glenn V. Rhodes appeals the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court's memorandum and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Rhodes v. Conroy, No. CA-00-1085-WMN (D.Md. Oct. 5, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.