Case Name: Edmond McNACK, Appellant, v. JACKSON COUNTY, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2007-03-27
Citations: 217 S.W.3d 374
Docket Number: No. WD 66994
Parties: Edmond McNACK, Appellant, v. JACKSON COUNTY, Respondent.
Judges: Before: ULRICH, P.J., LOWENSTEIN and SMART, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 217
Pages: 374–374

Head Matter:
Edmond McNACK, Appellant, v. JACKSON COUNTY, Respondent.
No. WD 66994.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
March 27, 2007.
Randell G. Collins, Kansas City, MO, for Respondent.
William G. Manson, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant.
Before: ULRICH, P.J., LOWENSTEIN and SMART, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
In his claim for workers' compensation, the appellant-employee relied on a physician to prove causation for his contraction of a relatively rare and debilitating blood disorder. The employer utilized a physician who testified that there was no causal connection between the on the job accident and the blood disorder. The appellant's appeal contends the Commission's award denying compensation was not supported by competent and substantial evidence. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).