Case Name: MARDIGAN v. STATE
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1930-01-20
Citations: 8 Ohio Law Abs. 106
Docket Number: No. 10429
Parties: MARDIGAN v STATE
Judges: Levine, J., concurs. Sullivan, J., not participating.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 8
Pages: 106–106

Head Matter:
MARDIGAN v STATE
Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist, Cuyahoga Co
No. 10429.
Decided January 20, 1930
Mr. Ben P. Rabb, Esq., Cleveland, for Mardigan.
Mr. Julius Kovachy, Esq., Cleveland, for State.

Opinion:
VICKERY, PJ.
We fail to see where there is any evidence in this record that would warrant a conviction of the plaintiff in error for violating the liquor law. In other words, it is an exceedingly weak case, there being no evidence to show a trafficking in liquor and the explanation of the party being made, we think that the conviction was wrong and the judgment of the court will be reversed, and there being no evidence to warrant a conviction, the plaintiff in error is discharged.
Levine, J., concurs. Sullivan, J., not participating.