Case Name: JONES & TURNER, INC. and Woody Bogler Trucking Co., Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. Elmer SENEVEY and Eric Senevey d/b/a/ Elmer and Eric Senevey Construction Co., Defendants/Appellants
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-09-16
Citations: 122 S.W.3d 596
Docket Number: No. ED 81853
Parties: JONES & TURNER, INC. and Woody Bogler Trucking Co., Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. Elmer SENEVEY and Eric Senevey d/b/a/ Elmer and Eric Senevey Construction Co., Defendants/Appellants.
Judges: Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, C.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 122
Pages: 596–596

Head Matter:
JONES & TURNER, INC. and Woody Bogler Trucking Co., Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. Elmer SENEVEY and Eric Senevey d/b/a/ Elmer and Eric Senevey Construction Co., Defendants/Appellants.
No. ED 81853.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Sept. 16, 2003.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Dec. 24, 2003.
Application for Transfer Denied Jan. 27, 2004.
Mark Anthony Richard, Jefferson City, MO, for Appellant.
Daniel Richard Green, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, C.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Elmer and Eric Senevey, d/b/a/ Elmer and Eric Senevey Construction Company, (collectively Appellants) appeal from a trial court judgment entered in favor of Jones & Turner, Inc. and Woody Bogler Trucking Company (collectively Respondents) on a breach of contract claim. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, nor does it erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).