Case Name: Ellis D. DOWNS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-09-01
Citations: 768 So. 2d 1149
Docket Number: No. 2D00-1076
Parties: Ellis D. DOWNS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: BLUE, A.C.J., and WHATLEY and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 768
Pages: 1149–1149

Head Matter:
Ellis D. DOWNS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D00-1076.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Sept. 1, 2000.
Rehearing Denied Oct. 2, 2000.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Ellis D. Downs appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm on the basis of Burgess v. State, 764 So.2d 749 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). We certify the same question we certified in Burgess, which is:
AFTER THE HOLDING IN CALLA-WAY, CAN A TRIAL COURT RELY UPON A SWORN ARREST REPORT IN THE COURT FILE TO DETERMINE, AS A MATTER OF LAW, THAT CONSECUTIVE HABITUAL OFFENDER SENTENCES ARE ILLEGAL? '
Affirmed; question certified.
BLUE, A.C.J., and WHATLEY and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.
. State v. Callaway, 658 So.2d 983 (Fla.1995), receded from on other grounds by Dixon v. State, 730 So.2d 265 (Fla.1999).