Case Name: SICKLEY BROTHERS, RESPONDENT, v. MICHEL & MOORE COMPANY, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1932-10-17
Citations: 109 N.J.L. 348
Docket Number: 
Parties: SICKLEY BROTHERS, RESPONDENT, v. MICHEL & MOORE COMPANY, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 109
Pages: 348–348

Head Matter:
SICKLEY BROTHERS, RESPONDENT, v. MICHEL & MOORE COMPANY, APPELLANT.
Submitted May 27, 1932 —
Decided October 17, 1932.
For the respondent, Riker & Riker.
For the appellant, Jacob E. Max.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion filed in the Supreme Court.
Eor affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Bodine, Brogan, Yan Buskirk, Kays, Dear, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.