Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Enrique VALDEZ-VALENZUELA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-06-18
Citations: 37 F. App'x 906
Docket Number: No. 01-10564; D.C. No. CR-01-00087-FRZ
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Enrique VALDEZ-VALENZUELA, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 37
Pages: 906–906

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Enrique VALDEZ-VALENZUELA, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 01-10564.
D.C. No. CR-01-00087-FRZ.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 10, 2002 .
Decided June 18, 2002.
Before RYMER, T.G. NELSON and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Enrique Valdez-Valenzuela appeals his conviction, pursuant to a guilty plea, and sentence for illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), with a sentencing enhancement pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2).
Valdez-Valenzuela's attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and has moved to withdraw as counsel of record. Valdez-Valenzuela did not file a pro se supplemental brief. Because our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), reveals no arguable issues, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw, and affirm the sentence.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.