Case Name: Kevin O. AINSWORTH Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of his Minor Children, Addision Ainsworth and Austin Ainsworth; Paulette Ainsworth, Individually v. TRI STAR BUILDERS, LLC, The Maryland Casualty Insurance Company, David Pascal Law, Thomas (Tommy) Wainwright, Thomas Wainwright Plumbing Company and/or Thomas (Tommy) Wainwright d/b/a Thomas Wainwright Plumbing Company and ABC Insurance Company
Court: Louisiana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 2015-03-06
Citations: 161 So. 3d 2
Docket Number: No. 2014-CC-2510
Parties: Kevin O. AINSWORTH Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of his Minor Children, Addision Ainsworth and Austin Ainsworth; Paulette Ainsworth, Individually v. TRI STAR BUILDERS, LLC, The Maryland Casualty Insurance Company, David Pascal Law, Thomas (Tommy) Wainwright, Thomas Wainwright Plumbing Company and/or Thomas (Tommy) Wainwright d/b/a Thomas Wainwright Plumbing Company and ABC Insurance Company.
Judges: KNOLL and HUGHES, JJ., would deny.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 161
Pages: 2–2

Head Matter:
Kevin O. AINSWORTH Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of his Minor Children, Addision Ainsworth and Austin Ainsworth; Paulette Ainsworth, Individually v. TRI STAR BUILDERS, LLC, The Maryland Casualty Insurance Company, David Pascal Law, Thomas (Tommy) Wainwright, Thomas Wainwright Plumbing Company and/or Thomas (Tommy) Wainwright d/b/a Thomas Wainwright Plumbing Company and ABC Insurance Company.
No. 2014-CC-2510.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
March 6, 2015.

Opinion:
In re Thomas (Tommy) Wainwright; Thomas (Tommy) Wainwright D/B/A Thomas Wainwright Plumbing Company; Thomas Wainwright Plumbing Company; — Defendant(s); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. I, No. 557,359; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2014 CW 1319.
Granted. The application is remanded to the court of appeal, which is directed to obtain a transcript of the trial and review the evidence to determine whether the trial court abused its discretion in granting the motion for new trial. See Martin v. Heritage Manor South, 00-1023 (La.4/3/01), 784 So.2d 627.
KNOLL and HUGHES, JJ., would deny.