Case Name: V. H. VAWTER V. ROGUE RIVER VALLEY CANNING COMPANY
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1928-04-20
Citations: 124 Or. 94
Docket Number: 
Parties: V. H. VAWTER V. ROGUE RIVER VALLEY CANNING COMPANY.
Judges: Band, C. J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 124
Pages: 94–102

Head Matter:
Submitted on motion to dismiss April 15,
motion denied April 28, 1925,
submitted on motion to dismiss April 19,
motion denied June 21,
argued on the merits December 15, 1927,
affirmed January 10,
costs taxed January 14,
rehearing denied April 20, 1928.
V. H. VAWTER V. ROGUE RIVER VALLEY CANNING COMPANY.
(257 Pac. 23; 262 Pac. 851.)
Contra, Mr. Gus Newbury.
For appellant there was a brief over the name of Messrs. Newbury & Newbury, with an oral argument by Mr. Bon Newbury.

Opinion:
BAND, J.
This is a motion to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that the bill of exceptions was not filed as a part of the transcript on appeal, nor within the time extended by the former order of this court.
The appeal was perfected during the September term, 1924, and a transcript consisting of a copy of the judgment, notice of appeal and proof of service and of the undertaking, was filed during said term, and the printed abstract was filed at the next term of this court. The bill of exceptions and the transcript of the testimony were not filed until after the expiration of the term next following the appeal, but were filed as soon as the same could be prepared and certified to. The filing of the bill of exceptions and of the transcript of the testimony was not jurisdictional and a sufficient excuse having been shown for the delay, the motion to dismiss the appeal should be overruled and it is so ordered.
Motion Overruled.