Case Name: SHOCKEY v. ILLINOIS
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1963-10-14
Citations: 375 U.S. 22
Docket Number: No. 20
Parties: SHOCKEY v. ILLINOIS.
Judges: Mr. Justice Harlan, for the reasons stated in Daegele v. Kansas, ante, p. 1, would have withheld disposition of this petition for certiorari until the disposition, after argument, of that case.
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 375
Pages: 22–22

Head Matter:
SHOCKEY v. ILLINOIS.
No. 20,
Misc.
Decided October 14, 1963.
John R. Snively for petitioner.
William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Illinois for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353.
Mr. Justice Harlan, for the reasons stated in Daegele v. Kansas, ante, p. 1, would have withheld disposition of this petition for certiorari until the disposition, after argument, of that case.