Case Name: The STATE of Texas v. Janice M. BOADO, Appellant
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 2001-09-19
Citations: 55 S.W.3d 621
Docket Number: No. 167-00
Parties: The STATE of Texas v. Janice M. BOADO, Appellant.
Judges: JOHNSON, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which PRICE, J. joined.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 55
Pages: 621–624

Head Matter:
The STATE of Texas v. Janice M. BOADO, Appellant.
No. 167-00.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Sept. 19, 2001.
Frank Blazek, Huntsville, for Appellant.
Candace Norris, Special Prosecution Unit, Plainview, Matthew Paul, State’s Attorney, Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
OPINION
The opinion was delivered
PER CURIAM.
Appellee was indicted for bribery. She filed a motion to quash the indictment, which the trial court granted. The State appealed. The Court of Appeals reversed.
Having examined the record and considered the arguments in the case, we conclude that our decision to grant review was improvident. Appellee's petition for discretionary review is dismissed.
JOHNSON, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which PRICE, J. joined.
. State v. Boado, 8 S.W.3d 15, 17-18 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1999).