Case Name: Bertley S. PILGRIM, etc., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1986-11-20
Citations: 499 So. 2d 850
Docket Number: No. 86-320
Parties: Bertley S. PILGRIM, etc., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ORFINGER and COWART, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 499
Pages: 850–850

Head Matter:
Bertley S. PILGRIM, etc., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 86-320.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Nov. 20, 1986.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 6, 1987.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Daniel J. Schafer, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and W. Brian Bayly, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
DAUKSCH, Judge.
This is an appeal from a sentence. It is the second appeal because we earlier quashed an improper sentence and remanded for resentencing. Pilgrim v. State, 480 So.2d 688 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). Because the trial court has once again failed to follow the dictates of the sentencing guidelines rules and statutes we must quash the sentence. Upon remand the trial judge is directed to impose a sentence of no less than five and one-half years and no greater than seven years imprisonment, probation or community control.
SENTENCE QUASHED; REMANDED.
ORFINGER and COWART, JJ., concur.