Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Louis H. YOUNG, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-12-03
Citations: 302 F. App'x 701
Docket Number: No. 07-10128
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Louis H. YOUNG, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 302
Pages: 701–701

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Louis H. YOUNG, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-10128.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 24, 2008.
Filed Dec. 3, 2008.
Alan Hechtkopf, Esquire, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Robert Lawrence Ellman, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Louis H. Young, Pekin, IL, pro se.
Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Louis H. Young appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 51-month sentence for conspiracy to defraud the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and money laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396,18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Young's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.