Case Name: Carl LINDBACK, III, Appellant, v. Niki LESKO and Loran Van Vleet, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1987-09-22
Citations: 513 So. 2d 718
Docket Number: No. 87-9
Parties: Carl LINDBACK, III, Appellant, v. Niki LESKO and Loran Van Vleet, Appellees.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HENDRY and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 513
Pages: 718–719

Head Matter:
Carl LINDBACK, III, Appellant, v. Niki LESKO and Loran Van Vleet, Appellees.
No. 87-9.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Sept. 22, 1987.
Rehearing Denied Oct. 21, 1987.
Kenneth H. Smith, Tavernier, for appellant.
Tittle & Tittle and Gus H. Crowell, Tav-ernier, for appellees.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HENDRY and JORGENSON, JJ.
Judge Hendry did not hear oral argument.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We find no abuse of discretion in the order under review granting a new trial on the well-articulated and fully supported grounds that the jury verdict was contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence and indicated that the jury had been influenced by considerations outside the record. See Ford Motor Co. v. Kikis, 401 So.2d 1341 (Fla.1981); Cloud v. Fallis, 110 So.2d 669 (Fla.1959).
Affirmed.