Case Name: Statoil ASA v. HeereMac v. o. f. et al.; White v. Florida; Shelton v. Cockrell, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division; Hogan v. Booker, Superintendent, Mississippi State Penitentiary, et al.; Facundo v. Holder, Warden, et al.; Facundo v. United States Parole Commission; and Facundo v. Drug Enforcement Administrative Agency; Rogers v. Texas; Williams, Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of California, et al. v. United States; Jackson v. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security, et al.; Jacobs v. Rice County, Minnesota; Rosano v. United States; Sherman v. Illinois; Silvera v. Orange County School Board; West v. Utah Non-Profit Housing Corp.; Holt v. United States; Newman v. Allstate Insurance Co. et al.; Chaney v. Chicago Transit Authority; McDermott v. Internal Revenue Service et al.; Taitt v. Whiteco Industries; Dassent v. Ashcroft, Attorney General, et al.; Richardson v. Federal Bureau of Investigation; Mosseri v. Florida et al.; Tinker v. Moore, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections; Mercer v. United States; Rasten v. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-04-15
Citations: 535 U.S. 1012
Docket Number: No. 00-1842; No. 00-10432; No. 00-10506; No. 00-10570; No. 00-10671; No. 00-10805; No. 01-175; No. 01-844; No. 01-913; No. 01-1055; No. 01-5178; No. 01-5862; No. 01-6838; No. 01-6909; No. 01-6952; No. 01-6995; No. 01-7052; No. 01-7077; No. 01-7082; No. 01-7312; No. 01-7351; No. 01-7371; No. 01-7531; No. 01-7651
Parties: Statoil ASA v. HeereMac v. o. f. et al., White v. Florida, Shelton v. Cockrell, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Hogan v. Booker, Superintendent, Mississippi State Penitentiary, et al., Facundo v. Holder, Warden, et al.; Fa-cundo v. United States Parole Commission; and Facundo v. Drug Enforcement Administrative Agency, Rogers v. Texas, Williams, Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of California, et al. v. United States, Jackson v. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security, et al., Jacobs v. Rice County, Minnesota, Rosano v. United States, Sherman v. Illinois, Silvera v. Orange County School Board, West v. Utah Non-Profit Housing Corp., Holt v. United States, Newman v. Allstate Insurance Co. et al., Chaney v. Chicago Transit Authority, McDermott v. Internal Revenue Service et al., Taitt v. Whiteco Industries, Dassent v. Ashcroft, Attorney General, et al., Richardson v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, Mosseri v. Florida et al., Tinker v. Moore, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Mercer v. United States, Rasten v. Department of Housing and Urban Development,
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 535
Pages: 1012–1013

Head Matter:
No. 00-1842.
No. 00-10432.
No. 00-10506.
No. 00-10570.
No. 00-10671.
No. 00-10805.
No. 01-175.
No. 01-844.
Statoil ASA v. HeereMac v. o. f. et al., White v. Florida, Shelton v. Cockrell, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Hogan v. Booker, Superintendent, Mississippi State Penitentiary, et al., Facundo v. Holder, Warden, et al.; Fa-cundo v. United States Parole Commission; and Facundo v. Drug Enforcement Administrative Agency, Rogers v. Texas, Williams, Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of California, et al. v. United States, Jackson v. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security, et al., Jacobs v. Rice County, Minnesota, Rosano v. United States, Sherman v. Illinois, Silvera v. Orange County School Board, West v. Utah Non-Profit Housing Corp., Holt v. United States, Newman v. Allstate Insurance Co. et al., Chaney v. Chicago Transit Authority, McDermott v. Internal Revenue Service et al., Taitt v. Whiteco Industries, Dassent v. Ashcroft, Attorney General, et al., Richardson v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, Mosseri v. Florida et al., Tinker v. Moore, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Mercer v. United States, Rasten v. Department of Housing and Urban Development,

Opinion:
534 U. S. 1127;
534 U. S. 857;
534 U. S. 862;
534 U. S. 866;
534 U. S. 872;
534 U. S. 880;
ante, p. 911;
534 U. S. 1156;
No. 01-913.
No. 01-1055.
No. 01-5178.
No. 01-5862.
No. 01-6838.
No. 01-6909.
No. 01-6952.
No. 01-6995.
No. 01-7052.
No. 01-7077.
No. 01-7082.
No. 01-7312.
No. 01-7351.
No. 01-7371.
No. 01-7531.
No. 01-7651.
534 U.S. 1134;
534 U. S. 1135;
534 U. S. 907;
534 U.S. 976;
534 U. S. 1087;
534 U. S. 1050;
534 U. S. 1092;
534 U. S. 1093;
534 U. S. 1106;
534 U. S. 1136;
534 U. S. 1106;
534 U. S. 1108;
534 U. S. 1143;
534 U. S. 1144;
534 U. S. 1150; and
ante, p. 908. Petitions for rehearing denied.