Case Name: Timothy Paul OLMOS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles L. RYAN and Allen Ortega, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-07-05
Citations: 474 F. App'x 546
Docket Number: No. 12-15233
Parties: Timothy Paul OLMOS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles L. RYAN and Allen Ortega, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: SCHROEDER, HAWKINS and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 474
Pages: 546–547

Head Matter:
Timothy Paul OLMOS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles L. RYAN and Allen Ortega, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 12-15233.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 26, 2012.
Filed July 5, 2012.
Timothy Paul Olmos, Florence, AZ, pro se.
Paul Edward Carter, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Arizona Attorney General, Tucson, AZ, for Defendants-Ap-pellees.
Before: SCHROEDER, HAWKINS and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Plaintiff Timothy Paul Olmos appeals pro se the district court's denial of his request for preliminary injunctive relief against defendant prison officials. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.
Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying preliminary injunctive relief, and we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion. The Lands Council v. McNair, 537 F.3d 981, 986 (9th Cir.2008); see Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 555 U.S. 7, 129 S.Ct. 365, 374, 172 L.Ed.2d 249 (2008) (listing factors for district court to consider); Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press Int'l, 686 F.2d 750, 752-53 (9th Cir. 1982) (explaining limited scope of review).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.