Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pamela J. ANDERSON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-04-29
Citations: 33 F. App'x 124
Docket Number: No. 01-7781
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pamela J. ANDERSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 33
Pages: 124–124

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pamela J. ANDERSON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 01-7781.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 17, 2002.
Decided April 29, 2002.
Pamela J. Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Timothy John Stinson, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Pamela J. Anderson appeals the district court's orders denying her motion for modification of sentence and her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court's orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Anderson, Nos. CR-96-95; CA-01-564-2 (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 24, entered Aug. 27, 2001; Oct. 4, 2001). The petition for a writ of mandamus is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.