Case Name: Springfield Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Gish, Brook & Co.
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1909-11-09
Citations: 25 Okla. 80
Docket Number: No. 273
Parties: Springfield Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Gish, Brook & Co.
Judges: All the Justices concur.
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 25
Pages: 80–80

Head Matter:
Springfield Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Gish, Brook & Co.
No. 273.
Opinion Filed November 9, 1909.
(105 Pac. 673.)
APPEAL AND ERROR — Record—Statement as to Evidence — Review. Where the case-made upon appeal does not contain a statement that it contains all the evidence presented upon 'the trial, no error assigned which requires an examination of the evidence „ can be reviewed by this court.
(Syllabus by the Court.)
Error from District Court, Caddo County; Frank M. Bailey, Judge.
Action by Gish, Brook & Co. against the Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
Motion to reinstate dismissal denied, and writ of error dismissed.
William Thompson and Fulton, Stringer & Grant, for plaintiff in error.
A. J. Moms,- for defendant in error.

Opinion:
Hates, J.
The status of this case is the same as that of Insurance Company of North America v. Gish, Brook & Co., ante, p. 78, 105 Pac. 672. The reasoning and conclusions of the court in that case must follow in this.
The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
All the Justices concur.