Case Name: Disciplinary Counsel v. Wheatley
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2006-09-21
Citations: 111 Ohio St. 3d 1202
Docket Number: No. 2005-0349
Parties: Disciplinary Counsel v. Wheatley.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 111
Pages: 1202–1203

Head Matter:
Disciplinary Counsel v. Wheatley.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Wheatley, 111 Ohio St.3d 1202, 2006-Ohio-5085.]
(No. 2005-0349
Submitted September 14, 2006
Decided September 21, 2006.)

Opinion:
On Application for Reinstatement.
{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Myron Daniel Wheatley, Attorney Registration No. 0038584, last known business address in Madison, Ohio.
{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of December 14, 2005, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of six months, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,
{¶ 3} It is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.
{¶ 4} It is further ordered, sua sponte, by the court that if the Clients' Security Fund awards any amount against the respondent pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VIII(7)(F), the respondent shall reimburse that amount to the Clients' Security Fund within 90 days of the notice of such award.
(¶ 5} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.
{¶ 6} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Wheatley, 107 Ohio St.3d 224, 2005-Ohio-6266, 837 N.E.2d 1188.
Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.