Case Name: STATE, ex rel McCrehen, v. BROWN, Sec. of State
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1923-09-28
Citations: 1 Ohio Law Abs. 863
Docket Number: No. 18119
Parties: STATE, ex rel McCrehen, v. BROWN, Sec. of State
Judges: 
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 1
Pages: 863–864

Head Matter:
No. 893
STATE, ex rel McCrehen, v. BROWN, Sec. of State
Ohio Supreme Court
No. 18119.
Decided Sept. 28, 1923
To Appear in — Ohio State Reports
164A. ELECTIONS.
Secretary of State may not pass on sufficiency of referendum petition until certified by the boards of Deputy State Supervisors of Election as to signatures — Duties of Secretary of State as to transmission of are mandatory for official syllabus. See 39 Abs. 698.

Opinion:
MARSHALL, C. J.
Epitomized Opinion
Action for the award of a writ of prohibition, to prohibit the Secretary of State from proceeding to bear and determine the sufficiency of a petition for the submission of a referendum upon the Taft Bill. The petition alleges that the Secretary of State has no jurisdiction toi hear and determine the sufficiency of the referendum petition. The answer stated that a protest had been filed claiming the insufficiency of the petition on the ground that it contained an insufficiency of signatures, and that Secretary of State was proceeding to determine that fact. The cause was heard upon a demurrer to the answer, and the question before the court was therefore whether the Secretary of State has the authority to determine the sufficiency of the referendum' petition. The Supreme Court held:
1. The constitution and statutes confer no power upon the Secretary of State to determine the sufficiency of the referendum petition or any of its parts at the time such petition is filed with the Secretary of State. The latter has neither expressed nor implied the power to'miake any determination relative to such petition until after the parts thereof have been transmitted to the boards of Deputy State Supervisors of Election of the counties from which there appear names of electors on the part of such petition, and after the same have returned to the Secretary of State with certificates of the numbers of signatures thereto.
Attorneys — B. B. Buckley, Dayton, and T. S. Hogan, Columbus,' for relator; C. C. Crabbe, Atty. Gen., Columbus, H. H. Griswold, Chardon, and W. J. Meyer, Columbus, for defendant; F. M. Dotson, Toledo, and Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, Columbus, and Robert A. Taft, Cincinnati, for defendants and cross-petitioners.