Case Name: John K. LATTA, Respondent, v. John MAHN, and Lisa Lindsey, Appellants
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2016-03-29
Citations: 491 S.W.3d 275
Docket Number: WD 78051
Parties: John K. LATTA, Respondent, v. John MAHN, and Lisa Lindsey, Appellants.
Judges: Before Division Four:, Alok Ahuja, C.J., and Thomas H, Newton and James E. : ■ Welsh, JJ. -
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 491
Pages: 275–276

Head Matter:
John K. LATTA, Respondent, v. John MAHN, and Lisa Lindsey, Appellants.
WD 78051
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Filed: March 29, 2016
Motion for Rehearing and/or' Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 3, 2016
Application for Transfer Denied June 28, 2016
John K. Latta, Kansas City, MO, Respondent acting pro se.
John Mahn and Lisa Lindsey, Kansas City, MO,: appellants acting pro se.
Before Division Four:, Alok Ahuja, C.J., and Thomas H, Newton and James E. : ■ Welsh, JJ. -

Opinion:
Alok Ahuja, Chief Judge
John Mahn and Lisa Lindsey appeal from a default judgment entered against them and in favor of Respondent John Latta. The judgment awarded Latta immediate possession of a rental property located in Kansas City. Because the default judgment is not itself appealable, we dismiss M^hn and Lindsey's appeal.
, On September 12, 2014, Latta filed a petition against Mahn and Lindsey for possession of rental property located at 3807 Kings Highway in Kansas City.. Latta alleged that rent had not been paid by tenants Mahn and Lindsey in the amount of $2425.00.
A hearing took place on October 9, 2014. Latta appeared in person, but Mahn and Lindsey did not appear. The circuit court entered a default judgment against them on the same date. Mahn and Lindsey never filed a motion to set aside the default judgment in the circuit court, but instead filed a notice of appeal to this Court on October 17,2014.
"The right of appeal is purely statutory. Without statutory authority, no right to appeal exists." AMG Franchises, Inc. v. Crack Team USA, Inc., 289 S.W.3d 655, 657 (Mo.App.E.D.2009) (citations omitted). In particular, "[i]t is well settled that a party may not appeal a default judgment until [the party] has proceeded with a motion to set aside the judgment as provided under Rule 74.05(d) unless the appeal presents questions concerning the trial court's subject matter jurisdiction or the sufficiency of the plaintiffs petition." Tan-Tar-A Estates, L.L.C. v. Steiner, 465 S.W.3d 915, 917 (Mo.App.S.D.2015) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted); see also, e.g., Agnello v. Walker, 306 S.W.3d 666, 675-76 (Mo.App.W.D.2010) ("The default judgment is subject to review only by appeal from the trial court's judgment denying [Appellant's] motion filed pursuant to Rule 74.05.").
Mahn and Lindsey have not argued, nor has this court found any reason to believe, that the circuit court lacked subject matter jurisdiction or that Latta's petition was insufficient. In these circumstances, "the direct appeal of the default judgment should be dismissed for failure to satisfy a mandatory prerequisite. A default judgment cannot be appealed unless the trial court has previously heard a motion to set aside or vacate the judgment. " Barney v. Suggs, 688 S.W.2d 356, 358 (Mo. banc 1985) (citing Vonsmith v. Vonsmith, 666 S.W.2d 424 (Mo. banc 1984)).
Conclusion
The appeal is dismissed.
All concur.