Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jonathan David ROALSEN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-01-19
Citations: 163 F. App'x 596
Docket Number: No. 04-30332; D.C. No. CR-03-00209-HA
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jonathan David ROALSEN, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before HUG, O’SCANNLAIN, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 163
Pages: 596–596

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jonathan David ROALSEN, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 04-30332.
D.C. No. CR-03-00209-HA.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 9, 2006.
Decided Jan. 19, 2006.
Stephen F. Peifer, USPO — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Portland, OR, for PlaintiffAppellee.
Michele L. Kohler, Kohler & Burrows, Portland, OR, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before HUG, O’SCANNLAIN, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Jonathan David Roalsen appeals his 37-month sentence following a guilty-plea conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
Because appellant was sentenced under the then-mandatory Sentencing Guidelines, and we cannot reliably determine from the record whether the sentence imposed would have been materially different had the district court known that the Guidelines were advisory, we remand the sentence for further proceedings consistent with United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez, 419 F.3d 906, 916 (9th Cir.2005).
REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.