Case Name: Cedric KEEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-02-25
Citations: 99 S.W.3d 60
Docket Number: No. ED 81259
Parties: Cedric KEEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, C.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and ROBERT E. CRIST, SR. J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 99
Pages: 60–61

Head Matter:
Cedric KEEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 81259.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Feb. 25, 2003.
Gwenda R. Robinson, Assistant State Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Nicole Gorovsky, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, C.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and ROBERT E. CRIST, SR. J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Cedric Keel ("Movant") appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing. Movant claims his counsel was ineffective. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the motion court's determination that movant's claims are refuted by the record is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would be of no precedential value. We affirm the judgment for the reasons set forth in the motion court's judgment. Rule 84.16(b).