Case Name: HARRY A. FINKEL, RELATOR, v. WILLIAM T. KALTENBACH, BUILDING INSPECTOR OF THE CITY OF ELIZABETH, NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1926-02-17
Citations: 4 N.J. Misc. 138
Docket Number: 
Parties: HARRY A. FINKEL, RELATOR, v. WILLIAM T. KALTENBACH, BUILDING INSPECTOR OF THE CITY OF ELIZABETH, NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 4
Pages: 138–138

Head Matter:
HARRY A. FINKEL, RELATOR, v. WILLIAM T. KALTENBACH, BUILDING INSPECTOR OF THE CITY OF ELIZABETH, NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT.
Submitted November 7, 1925
Decided February 17, 1926.
Before Justices Tbefchaed, Eatzenbach and Lloyd.
Eor the relator, Michael H. Feldman. ■
For the defendant, J oseph T. Hague and Spaulding Frazer.

Opinion:
Pee Cueiam.
This is a rule directing the building inspector of the city of Elizabeth to show cause why a writ of mandamus should not issue commanding him to issue a permit to Harry A. Finkel (the relator) for the erection of a two-and-a-half-story brick building for stores and dwellings at 480, 482 Rahway avenue, Elizabeth, New Jersey.
This case is similar in all pertinent facts to No. 272 of this term between the same parties, and' is controlled by the same legal principles. For the reason given in that case a peremptory writ of mandamus will be-issued.