Case Name: Clarence B. JENKINS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA HUMAN AFFAIRS COMMISSION, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-11-27
Citations: 704 F. App'x 248
Docket Number: No. 17-2162
Parties: Clarence B. JENKINS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA HUMAN AFFAIRS COMMISSION, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 704
Pages: 248–249

Head Matter:
Clarence B. JENKINS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA HUMAN AFFAIRS COMMISSION, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 17-2162
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: November 21, 2017
Decided: November 27, 2017
Clarénce B. Jenkins, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Matthews, RICHARDSON PLOWDEN, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Clarence B. Jenkins, Jr., appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, dismissing Jenkins' 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) claims, declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims, and remanding the remaining claims back to state court. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c) (2012). Jenkins' objections were sufficient to preserve appellate review but we nonetheless affirm on the merits. Jenkins v. S.C. Human Affairs Comm'n, No. 3:16-cv-03255-TLW, 2017 WL 4012454 (D.S.C. Sept. 12, 2017). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED