Case Name: Leila FORD, Petitioner, v. ACME ROOF DECKS, INC., Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1964-10-28
Citations: 168 So. 2d 316
Docket Number: No. 33530
Parties: Leila FORD, Petitioner, v. ACME ROOF DECKS, INC., Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
Judges: DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, TPIORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 168
Pages: 316–316

Head Matter:
Leila FORD, Petitioner, v. ACME ROOF DECKS, INC., Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
No. 33530.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Oct. 28, 1964.
Richard A. Sicking and Kaplan, Ser, Abrams & O’Malley, Miami, for petitioner.
Lally, Miller & Hodges, Miami, for respondent Acme Roof Decks, Inc., and Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Patrick PI. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondent Florida Industrial Commission.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we-have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date April 24, 1964.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.
DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, TPIORNAL and O'CONNELL, JJ., concur.