Case Name: James JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. K MART CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-02-14
Citations: 281 F.3d 1368
Docket Number: No. 99-14563
Parties: James JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. K MART CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 281
Pages: 1368–1368

Head Matter:
James JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. K MART CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 99-14563.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Feb. 14, 2002.
Caren I. Friedman, Washington, DC, for EEOC, Amicus Curiae.
Ann Elizabeth Reesman, McGuiness, Norris & Williams, LLP, Washington, DC, for Equal Employment Advisory Council, Amicus Curiae.
Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
BY THE COURT:
In view of Kmart Corporation's filing of a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition, and in compliance with 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(1), no decision will be rendered in this case until the bankruptcy court grants relief from the automatic stay or the stay lapses. See Ellison v. Northwest Engineering Company, 707 F.2d 1310 (11th Cir.1983).
The parties are directed to inform the Court when the bankruptcy court grants relief from the automatic stay or the stay lapses.