Case Name: Jeffrey Anthony FRANKLIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert A. HOREL, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-07-25
Citations: 286 F. App'x 443
Docket Number: No. 07-56329
Parties: Jeffrey Anthony FRANKLIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert A. HOREL, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 286
Pages: 443–444

Head Matter:
Jeffrey Anthony FRANKLIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert A. HOREL, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 07-56329.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 23, 2008.
Filed July 25, 2008.
Jeffrey Anthony Franklin, pro se.
Attorney General, Office of the California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.
Before: CANBY, RYMER, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
On May 27, 2008, this court denied appellant's request for a certificate of appeal-ability as unnecessary because he is not challenging a conviction or imposition of sentence. By same order, this court ordered appellant to show cause as to why the district court's judgment should not be summarily affirmed for the reasons stated in its Order Denying Motion for Relief from Judgement or Order dated July 27, 2007.
A review of appellant's response to the court's order to show cause and the record indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.
All outstanding motions are denied as moot.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.