Case Name: Adrian SALMON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. M. CARILLO; Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2000-08-02
Citations: 222 F.3d 1046
Docket Number: No. 96-55707
Parties: Adrian SALMON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. M. CARILLO; Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before: SKOPIL, REINHARDT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 222
Pages: 1046–1046

Head Matter:
Adrian SALMON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. M. CARILLO; Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 96-55707.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Filed Aug. 2, 2000
Before: SKOPIL, REINHARDT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
The order filed June 28, 2000 is amended as follows: In light of the opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Roe v. Flores-Ortega, 528 U.S. 470, 120 S.Ct. 1029, 145 L.Ed.2d 985 (2000), it is ORDERED that this case be remanded to the district court for an evidentiary hearing on Petitioner's plea-related and appeal-related ineffectiveness of counsel claims. With this amendment, the petition for rehearing is denied.