Case Name: William Francis QUINN, Appellant, v. Sheila M. QUINN, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-01-11
Citations: 536 So. 2d 1184
Docket Number: No. 88-0709
Parties: William Francis QUINN, Appellant, v. Sheila M. QUINN, Appellee.
Judges: LETTS, J., and POLEN, MARK E., Associate Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 536
Pages: 1184–1186

Head Matter:
William Francis QUINN, Appellant, v. Sheila M. QUINN, Appellee.
No. 88-0709.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jan. 11, 1989.
Jane Kreusler-Walsh of Klein & Bera-nek, P.A., and Ronald Sales, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Susan J. O’Hara of Susan J. O’Hara, P.A., Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the award of permanent alimony, and because we see no consistent pattern to the wife's income-earning ability, we also affirm the amount thereof as being within the court's discretion. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197,1202 (Fla.1980).
LETTS, J., and POLEN, MARK E., Associate Judge, concur.
GLICKSTEIN, J., concurs specially with opinion.