Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joey Riddick, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2011-10-13
Citations: 88 A.D.3d 516
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joey Riddick, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 88
Pages: 516–517

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joey Riddick, Appellant.
[930 NYS2d 876]

Opinion:
The resentencing proceeding imposing a term of postrelease supervision was neither barred by double jeopardy nor otherwise unlawful (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]). There is no merit to defendant's argument that a 60-day stay of judgment issued in defendant's CPLR article 78 proceeding against the Department of Correctional Services imposed a deadline on the resentencing court.
We have no authority to revisit defendant's prison sentence on this appeal (see id. at 635). Concur — Catterson, J.E, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels and Román, JJ.