Case Name: Antonia Angelone et al., Appellants, v. City of New York, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2007-11-07
Citations: 45 A.D.3d 513
Docket Number: 
Parties: Antonia Angelone et al., Appellants, v City of New York, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 45
Pages: 513–514

Head Matter:
Antonia Angelone et al., Appellants, v City of New York, Respondent.
[845 NYS2d 427]

Opinion:
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Mega, J.), dated July 27, 2006, as granted those branches of the defendant's motion which were for summary judgment dismissing the first and third causes of action in the complaint.
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and those branches of the defendant's motion which were for summary judgment dismissing the first and third causes of action are denied.
The 4½-year-old infant plaintiff allegedly was injured when she fell from playground equipment located at the Crescent Beach Park on Staten Island (hereinafter the park). The plaintiffs alleged, inter alia, that the infant plaintiffs injuries were the result of negligence in designing, constructing, and maintaining the playground equipment at the park by the defendant City of New York. Following joinder of issue and discovery, the City moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. In the order appealed from, the Supreme Court, among other things, granted the City's motion. We reverse the order insofar as appealed from.
The City failed to establish its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law since it did not present evidence that it maintained the playground equipment at the park in a reasonably safe condition (cf. Sobti v Lindenhurst School Dist., 35 AD3d 439 [2006]; Swan v Town of Brookhaven, 32 AD3d 1012, 1013 [2006]; Banks v Freeport Union Free School Dist., 302 AD2d 341, 341-342 [2003]).
The parties' remaining contentions either are without merit or need not be addressed in light of our determination. Crane, J.P., Lifson, Covello and McCarthy, JJ., concur.