Case Name: INTERCONTINENTAL TRANSPORTATION CO., Inc., Owner of THE S.S. NATALIE, Petitioner-Appellee, v. STATES MARINE LINES, INC., Respondent-Appellant, and Arrow Steamship Co., Inc., Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1961-12-08
Citations: 297 F.2d 249
Docket Number: No. 102, Docket 27072
Parties: INTERCONTINENTAL TRANSPORTATION CO., Inc., Owner of THE S.S. NATALIE, Petitioner-Appellee, v. STATES MARINE LINES, INC., Respondent-Appellant, and Arrow Steamship Co., Inc., Respondent.
Judges: Before SWAN, WATERMAN and FRIENDLY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 297
Pages: 249–249

Head Matter:
INTERCONTINENTAL TRANSPORTATION CO., Inc., Owner of THE S.S. NATALIE, Petitioner-Appellee, v. STATES MARINE LINES, INC., Respondent-Appellant, and Arrow Steamship Co., Inc., Respondent.
No. 102, Docket 27072.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued Dec. 1, 1961.
Decided Dec. 8, 1961.
Kirlin, Campbell & Keating, New York ■City, for respondent-appellant, States Marine Lines, Inc., James J. Higgins, Advocate. L. De Grove Potter, New York City, of counsel.
Healy, Baillie & Burke, New York City, for appellee. Nicholas J. Healy, III, Raymond J. Burke, Thomas A. Dillon, Jr., New York City, Advocates.
Zock, Petrie, Sheneman & Reid, New York City, for Arrow Steamship Co., Inc., Francis J. O’Brien, New York City, Advocate.
Before SWAN, WATERMAN and FRIENDLY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The order is so clearly correct that it would have been affirmed at the conclusion of the arguments, except for a question as to whether it was an appealable order. Farr & Co. v. Cia Intercontinental De Navegacion, 2 Cir., 243 F.2d 342 disposes of that question. Order affirmed on Judge Murphy's opinion, 200 F.Supp. 88.