Case Name: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ALLAN R. JIMINEZ, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1990-04-03
Citations: 118 N.J. 252
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ALLAN R. JIMINEZ, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 118
Pages: 252–252

Head Matter:
571 A.2d 295
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ALLAN R. JIMINEZ, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Argued March 13, 1990
Decided April 3, 1990.
Thomas F. Scully, First Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant (Thomas S. Smith, Jr., Acting Public Defender, attorney; Thomas F. Scully and Donald J. McCauley, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, of counsel and on the briefs).
Mark P. Stalford, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent {John Kaye, Monmouth County Prosecutor, attorney).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The judgment 229 N.J.Super. 256, 551 A.2d 191 is reversed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division in State v. Joseph Clay, reported at 230 N.J.Super. 509, 553 A.2d 1356 (1989).
For reversal — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 7.
For affirmance — None.