Case Name: Christian E. JACKSON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2006-01-26
Citations: 921 So. 2d 611
Docket Number: No. SC05-654
Parties: Christian E. JACKSON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 921
Pages: 611–611

Head Matter:
Christian E. JACKSON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. SC05-654.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Jan. 26, 2006.
Beverly A. Pohl of Broad and Cassel, Fort Lauderdale, FL, and Cynthia E. Gunther of Bruce S. Rogow, P.A., Fort Laud-erdale, FL, for Petitioner.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, FL, Robert J. Krauss, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Chief of Criminal Law and Ronald Napolitano, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, FL, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PARIENTE, C.J.
We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Jackson v. State, 895 So.2d 1275 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005), a decision which the Second District Court of Appeal certified to be in direct conflict with the Fifth District Court of Appeal's decision in Johnson v. State, 877 So.2d 795 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. Subsequently, the Fifth District decided Bouno v. State, 900 So.2d 672 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005), in which the Fifth District distinguished its prior opinion in Johnson and agreed with the Second District that a claim of vindictive sentencing is not cognizable in a motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Based on the Fifth District's decision in Bouno, we have determined that we should decline to exercise our discretionary jurisdiction. Accordingly, this review proceeding is hereby dismissed.
It is so ordered.
WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.