Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Rosemary Martire, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1943-06-22
Citations: 266 A.D. 361
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Rosemary Martire, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 266
Pages: 361–361

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Rosemary Martire, Appellant.
First Department,
June 22, 1943.
Arthur M. Laufer for appellant.
George Raducan of counsel (Bernard L. Alderman with him on the brief; Frank S. Hogan, District Attorney), for respond-ent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The admission of evidence of other alleged crimes constituted error which requires reversal of the judgment. It do.es not appear that these alleged crimes were part of any general plan or scheme which included the offense charged in the information nor did they tend to establish the defendant's criminal intent in relation to that offense. (People v. Horie, 258 App. Div. 246.)
The judgment of conviction should be reversed and a new trial granted.
Untbrmybr, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ., concur; Martin, P. J., concurs in result.
Judgment unanimously reversed and a new trial ordered.