Case Name: Lottie Tomaszewski et al., Appellants, v. William Cleveland, Defendant, and Gloria Martinez, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1982-01-14
Citations: 55 N.Y.2d 852
Docket Number: 
Parties: Lottie Tomaszewski et al., Appellants, v William Cleveland, Defendant, and Gloria Martinez, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 55
Pages: 852–853

Head Matter:
Lottie Tomaszewski et al., Appellants, v William Cleveland, Defendant, and Gloria Martinez, Respondent.
Decided January 14, 1982
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Lawrence A. Shulz for appellant.
Victor A. Rossetti for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On summary consideration, order reversed, with costs, and the motion by defendant Martinez to dismiss the complaint denied. We disagree with the holding of the Appellate Division basing its decision as to defendant Martinez on the invalidity of the order and postattachment procedure, issues which have been waived by defendant's failure to timely raise them. Defendant also waived her objections to quasi in rem jurisdiction by failing to allege this ground in her answer (see Gager v White, 53 NY2d 475, 489).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtleé, Fuchsberg and Meyer.