Case Name: Robert M. FISK, Respondent on Review, v. Thomas G. BARTLEY, and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Penner and Smith, Inc., Petitioners on Review
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1992-02-13
Citations: 312 Or. 669
Docket Number: CC 89-0021; CA A63606; SC S37558
Parties: Robert M. FISK, Respondent on Review, v. Thomas G. BARTLEY, and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Penner and Smith, Inc., Petitioners on Review.
Judges: 
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 312
Pages: 669–671

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted May 8, 1991,
the order of dismissal of the Court of Appeals reversed and case remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration February 13, 1992
Robert M. FISK, Respondent on Review, v. Thomas G. BARTLEY, and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Penner and Smith, Inc., Petitioners on Review.
(CC 89-0021; CA A63606; SC S37558)
825 P2d 1389
Kathryft H. Clarke, Portland, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioners on review.
J. W. Walton, of James W. Walton, P.C., Corvallis, argued the cause and filed the responses for respondent on review.

Opinion:
PETERSON, J.,
dissenting.
I dissent for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Baugh v. Bryant Limited Partnerships, 312 Or 635, 645, 825 P2d 1383 (1992).