Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Eric FULTON, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-10-19
Citations: 146 S.W.3d 438
Docket Number: No. ED 83871
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Eric FULTON, Appellant.
Judges: Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 146
Pages: 438–438

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Eric FULTON, Appellant.
No. ED 83871.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Oct. 19, 2004.
Douglas A. Forsyth, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Deborah Daniels, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Eric Fulton ("Defendant") appeals from the trial court's judgment entered in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis upon his conviction by a jury of one count of robbery in the first degree, one count of kidnapping, and two counts of armed criminal action. In his appeal, Defendant contends that the trial court erred in: (1) denying his motion for a mistrial after a seasoned police officer offered testimony that referenced Defendant's prior arrests in the area of the alleged crime scene as evidence of his likely involvement in the crimes charged, and (2) finding Defendant guilty of the charged offenses because the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and no error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).