Case Name: Henry Earl DONALDSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2010-12-22
Citations: 49 So. 3d 342
Docket Number: No. 2D10-3062
Parties: Henry Earl DONALDSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: KHOUZAM and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 49
Pages: 342–342

Head Matter:
Henry Earl DONALDSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D10-3062.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Dec. 22, 2010.
Henry Earl Donaldson, pro se.

Opinion:
LaROSE, Judge.
Henry Earl Donaldson appeals an order dismissing his motion for postconviction relief. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850. The order specifically notes that the dismissal is without prejudice; it gives Mr. Donaldson thirty days to refile a facially sufficient motion. He did not do so. The order states that it is not appealable.
Mr. Donaldson also appeals a separate order denying him an extension of time to refile his motion for postconviction relief.
Neither order is appealable. Accordingly, we dismiss. See, e.g., Ham v. State, 36 So.3d 189 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (dismissing appeal because order denying motion for extension of time was not a final, appeal-able order); Herron v. State, 34 So.3d 206 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (explaining that appellate courts do not have jurisdiction to review rule 3.850 nonfinal orders). Upon remand, the postconviction court should enter a final appealable order.
Dismissed.
KHOUZAM and BLACK, JJ., Concur.