Case Name: The COUNTY OF GRAYSON, VIRGINIA; Richard Vaughn, in his Official Capacity as Sheriff of Grayson County; The County of Carroll, Virginia, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. John T. SPANE; Dale W. Sutphin, Defendants-Appellees, and RA-Tech Services, Inc., Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-07-02
Citations: 609 F. App'x 150
Docket Number: No. 14-1969
Parties: The COUNTY OF GRAYSON, VIRGINIA; Richard Vaughn, in his Official Capacity as Sheriff of Grayson County; The County of Carroll, Virginia, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. John T. SPANE; Dale W. Sutphin, Defendants-Appellees, and RA-Tech Services, Inc., Defendant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 609
Pages: 150–150

Head Matter:
The COUNTY OF GRAYSON, VIRGINIA; Richard Vaughn, in his Official Capacity as Sheriff of Grayson County; The County of Carroll, Virginia, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. John T. SPANE; Dale W. Sutphin, Defendants-Appellees, and RA-Tech Services, Inc., Defendant.
No. 14-1969.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 19, 2015.
Decided: July 2, 2015.
Cullen Dennis Seltzer, Sands Anderson PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellants. Gregory D. Habeeb, Monica Taylor Monday, Daniel R. Sullivan, Gentry, Locke, Rakes & Moore, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee John T. Spane.
Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Appellants appeal the district court's order dismissing their fraud in the inducement claims against John T. Spane and Dale W. Sutphin. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cnty. Of Grayson v. Spane, No. 7:13-cv-00384-GEC, 2014 WL 2257155 (W.D.Va. May 29, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before .this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.