Case Name: Steve W. WATSON and Cathy R. Watson, Respondent v. TOWN OF PENDLETON and Anderson County, South Carolina Defendants, of whom Anderson County is Appellant. Appeal of ANDERSON COUNTY
Court: Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jurisdiction: South Carolina
Decision Date: 1986-06-09
Citations: 289 S.C. 315
Docket Number: 22568
Parties: Steve W. WATSON and Cathy R. Watson, Respondent v. TOWN OF PENDLETON and Anderson County, South Carolina Defendants, of whom Anderson County is Appellant. Appeal of ANDERSON COUNTY.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Carolina Reports
Volume: 289
Pages: 315–316

Head Matter:
22568
Steve W. WATSON and Cathy R. Watson, Respondent v. TOWN OF PENDLETON and Anderson County, South Carolina Defendants, of whom Anderson County is Appellant. Appeal of ANDERSON COUNTY.
(345 S. E. (2d) 489)
Supreme Court
Michael F. Mullinax, of Long, Thomason & Mullinax, Anderson, for appellant.
Jack F. McIntosh, of McIntosh & Sherard, Anderson, for respondents.
Steven M. Krause, of Epps & Krause, Anderson, for defendant Town of Pendleton.
Heard May 20, 1986.
Decided June 9, 1986.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
Appellant contends that the damages were not proven properly in this inverse condemnation case. Due to the inconsistency between the trial judge's ruling on what was admissible on the issue of damages and the testimony which was subsequently admitted, this case is reversed and remanded on the issue of damages. See South Carolina Department of Highways and Public Transportation v. Cheston, 278 S. C. 464, 298 S. E. (2d) 447 (1982).
Appellant further contends that pursuant to S. C. Code Ann. § 5-27-120, 5-31-450 (1976) the City of Pendleton has exclusive liability in this matter. Appellant did not raise this defense in its pleadings, but chose to answer the complaint on its merits. We therefore decline to consider this issue on appeal.
Reversed and remanded.