Case Name: Sarah Barton, Respondent, v. Samuel Paul, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1930-06
Citations: 230 A.D. 749
Docket Number: 
Parties: Sarah Barton, Respondent, v. Samuel Paul, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 230
Pages: 749–749

Head Matter:
Sarah Barton, Respondent, v. Samuel Paul, Appellant.
Revd., 255 N. Y.-.

Opinion:
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Hinman, Davis, Whitmyer and Hasbrouek, JJ., concur; Van Kirk, P. J., votes to reverse and dismiss complaint because of the contributory negligence of the plaintiff on undisputed evidence. (Baker v. Close, 137 App. Div. 529; affd., 204 N. Y. 92; Knapp v. Barrett, 216 id. 226, 232: Dolfini v. Erie R. R. Co., 178 id. 1, 4; Wood v. Pace, 220 App. Div. 386; affd., 250 N. Y. 556; Barker v. Savage, 45 id. 191.)