Case Name: AUTHENEX, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EMC CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee; Authenex, Inc., Plaintiff, and Jeremy S. Pitcock, Sanctioned Party-Appellant, and Jennifer L. Ishimoto, Sanctioned Party-Appellant, and David R. Stevens, Sanctioned Party-Appellant, v. EMC Corporation, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-01-31
Citations: 461 F. App'x 948
Docket Number: Nos. 2011-1398, 2011-1490
Parties: AUTHENEX, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EMC CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. Authenex, Inc., Plaintiff, and Jeremy S. Pitcock, Sanctioned Party-Appellant, and Jennifer L. Ishimoto, Sanctioned Party-Appellant, and David R. Stevens, Sanctioned Party-Appellant, v. EMC Corporation, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 461
Pages: 948–949

Head Matter:
AUTHENEX, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EMC CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. Authenex, Inc., Plaintiff, and Jeremy S. Pitcock, Sanctioned Party-Appellant, and Jennifer L. Ishimoto, Sanctioned Party-Appellant, and David R. Stevens, Sanctioned Party-Appellant, v. EMC Corporation, Defendant-Appellee.
Nos. 2011-1398, 2011-1490.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Jan. 31, 2012.
Jeremy S. Pitcock, Pitcock Law Group, New York, NY, for Plaintiff-Appellant/Sanctioned Party-Appellant.
Chris R. Ottenweller, Orrick, Herring-ton & Sutcliffe LLP, Menlo Park, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.
David R. Stevens, Stevens Law Group, San Jose, CA, Jennifer L. Ishimoto, Banie & Ishimoto, LLP, Palo Alto, CA, for Sanctioned Party-Appellant.

Opinion:
ON MOTION
ORDER
The Appellants move unopposed to dismiss their appeals.
Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
The motions are granted.