Case Name: Ramgopal Kancharla, Respondent, v. Applied Cybernetics International, Inc., et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1998-02-10
Citations: 247 A.D.2d 260
Docket Number: 
Parties: Ramgopal Kancharla, Respondent, v Applied Cybernetics International, Inc., et al., Appellants.
Judges: Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Nardelli and Rubin, JJ.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 247
Pages: 260–260

Head Matter:
Ramgopal Kancharla, Respondent, v Applied Cybernetics International, Inc., et al., Appellants.
[668 NYS2d 360]

Opinion:
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.), entered September 5, 1996, awarding plaintiff damages, and bringing up for review a prior order, entered August 28, 1996, which granted plaintiff's motion pursuant to CPLR 3213 to enforce a Florida judgment entered against defendants on default, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
The motion was properly granted on the grounds that plaintiff's facially valid affidavits of service in both the Florida and New York actions were not adequately rebutted by defendants' bare assertions of improper service (see, Levin v Dorrian, 171 AD2d 415). Defendants' remaining contentions are without merit.
Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Nardelli and Rubin, JJ.