Case Name: Ophelia Latorraca, complainant-appellant, v. Nicola Latorraca et al., defendants-respondents
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1943-04-30
Citations: 133 N.J. Eq. 298
Docket Number: 
Parties: Ophelia Latorraca, complainant-appellant, v. Nicola Latorraca et al., defendants-respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 133
Pages: 298–298

Head Matter:
Ophelia Latorraca, complainant-appellant, v. Nicola Latorraca et al., defendants-respondents.
[Argued February 8th, 1943.
Decided April 30th, 1943.]
Mr. Milton M. Unger, for the complainant-appellant.
Messrs. Lum, Fairlie & Wachenfeld (Mr. Ralph E. hum and Mr. Joseph J. Biunno), for the respondent Joseph Latorraca.
Mr. Nathan A. Whitfield, guardian, pro se.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Bigelow and reported at 132 N. J. Eq. 40.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Parker, Case, Bodihe, Dohges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Wells, Rafferty, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.