Case Name: ELLEDGE R. PENLAND, Appellant, v. NATHAN GOLDEN et al., Respondents
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1951-11-05
Citations: 107 Cal. App. 2d 256
Docket Number: Civ. No. 18357
Parties: ELLEDGE R. PENLAND, Appellant, v. NATHAN GOLDEN et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports, Second Series
Volume: 107
Pages: 256–256

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 18357.
Second Dist., Div. One.
Nov. 5, 1951.]
ELLEDGE R. PENLAND, Appellant, v. NATHAN GOLDEN et al., Respondents.
Elledge R. Penland, in pro. per., for Appellant.
Major & Tenner and Jack Tenner for Respondents.

Opinion:
HANSON, J. pro. tem.
This is an appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to a complaint with leave to amend. As an appeal does not lie from such an order, but only from a judgment entered thereon we are without jurisdiction to review the case on its merits. (Cornic v. Stewart, 179 Cal. 242 [176 P. 164].) Accordingly, we are required on our own motion to dismiss the appeal.
Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
White, P. J., and Doran, J., concurred.