Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Fitzgerald LIGHTNER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-02-20
Citations: 90 F. App'x 678
Docket Number: No. 03-7609
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. David Fitzgerald LIGHTNER, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 90
Pages: 678–679

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. David Fitzgerald LIGHTNER, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 03-7609.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 12, 2004.
Decided Feb. 20, 2004.
David Fitzgerald Lightner, Appellant pro se. Gretchen C.F. Shappert, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
David Fitzgerald Lightner appeals the district court's order denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Lightner, No. CR-93-133 (W.D.N.C. July 10, 2003). We deny Light-ner's motion to remand his case and grant his motion for judicial notice. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED