Case Name: Dion VAUGHN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-12-26
Citations: 215 S.W.3d 213
Docket Number: No. WD 66166
Parties: Dion VAUGHN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before THOMAS H. NEWTON, P.J., PATRICIA A. BRECKENRIDGE, and JOSEPH M. ELLIS, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 215
Pages: 213–213

Head Matter:
Dion VAUGHN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 66166.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Dec. 26, 2006.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 30, 2007.
Application for Transfer Denied March 20, 2007.
Elizabeth U. Carlyle, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before THOMAS H. NEWTON, P.J., PATRICIA A. BRECKENRIDGE, and JOSEPH M. ELLIS, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Mr. Dion Vaughn appeals the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion. He asserts that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object or request any relief after a venireperson made a remark during voir dire about Mr. Vaughn's alibi witness and for failing to object to an in-court identification by a State's witness. In addition, he asserts that appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge the in-court identification on appeal.
For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).