Case Name: IN THE MATTER OF RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT, v. RUTGERS COUNCIL OF AAUP CHAPTERS, PETITIONER-APPELLANT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1993-02-02
Citations: 131 N.J. 118
Docket Number: 
Parties: IN THE MATTER OF RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT, v. RUTGERS COUNCIL OF AAUP CHAPTERS, PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 131
Pages: 118–119

Head Matter:
618 A.2d 853
IN THE MATTER OF RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT, v. RUTGERS COUNCIL OF AAUP CHAPTERS, PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
Argued January 19, 1993
Decided February 2, 1993.
Before WILENTZ, C.J., and CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN, JJ.
Paul Schachter argued the cause for appellant (Reinhardt & Schachter, attorneys).
Robert E. Anderson, General Counsel, argued the cause for respondent Public Employment Relations Commission.
John B. Wolf argued the cause for respondent Rutgers, The State University.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 256 N.J.Super. 104, 606 A.2d 822 (1992).
For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ, and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 7.
For reversal — None.