Case Name: Amy Corporation, Plaintiff, v. Reta E. Wendt, Appellant, and Samuel T. Pascuzzi et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1950-11-01
Citations: 277 A.D.2d 1088
Docket Number: 
Parties: Amy Corporation, Plaintiff, v. Reta E. Wendt, Appellant, and Samuel T. Pascuzzi et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 277
Pages: 1088–1088

Head Matter:
Amy Corporation, Plaintiff, v. Reta E. Wendt, Appellant, and Samuel T. Pascuzzi et al., Respondents.

Opinion:
Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Memorandum: The cause of action alleged in the answer against the defendant-appellant is erroneously labeled as a counterclaim. However, it does not state an affirmative cause of action against the defendant-appellant which should not be stricken on motion. When the facts are developed at the trial, if the plaintiff is successful, the court may then determine whether or not defendants-respondents are entitled to the relief asked for against the defendant-appellant. All concur. (Appeal from an order denying a motion to strike out part of an answer which asked affirmative relief against a codefendant.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Vaughan, Kimball and Piper, JJ.