Case Name: Philip Lazzaro et al., Appellants, v. Thomas J. Kelly et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1982-07-01
Citations: 57 N.Y.2d 630
Docket Number: 
Parties: Philip Lazzaro et al., Appellants, v Thomas J. Kelly et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 57
Pages: 630–632

Head Matter:
Philip Lazzaro et al., Appellants, v Thomas J. Kelly et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.
Decided July 1, 1982
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Mitchell T. Williams for appellants.
Philip O’Shea, Jr., for respondents.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (87 AD2d 975). Service as an escrow agent does not provide a basis for invocation of the continuous representation doctrine.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer. Taking no part: Judge Gabrielli.