Case Name: Gerald J. RICE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sergeant ALSTON; Nurse Lloyd; Thomas Corcoran, Warden, Defendants-Appellees, and John Doe; Jane Doe; Other Unknown Defendants, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-06-02
Citations: 64 F. App'x 401
Docket Number: No. 03-6483
Parties: Gerald J. RICE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sergeant ALSTON; Nurse Lloyd; Thomas Corcoran, Warden, Defendants-Appellees, and John Doe; Jane Doe; Other Unknown Defendants, Defendants.
Judges: Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 64
Pages: 401–401

Head Matter:
Gerald J. RICE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sergeant ALSTON; Nurse Lloyd; Thomas Corcoran, Warden, Defendants-Appellees, and John Doe; Jane Doe; Other Unknown Defendants, Defendants.
No. 03-6483.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 19, 2003.
Decided June 2, 2003.
Gerald J. Rice, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Sharon Stanley Street, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland; Donald Joseph Crawford, Aldelman, Sheff & Smith, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Gerald J. Rice appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Rice v. Alston, No. CA-02-1823^8-DKC (D. Md. filed Feb. 20, 2003 & entered Feb. 21, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.