Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kejuan Chaviz MOORE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-10-06
Citations: 585 F. App'x 344
Docket Number: No. 13-50338
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kejuan Chaviz MOORE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: W. FLETCHER, RAWLINSON, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 585
Pages: 344–345

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kejuan Chaviz MOORE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-50338.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 23, 2014.
Filed Oct. 6, 2014.
Jean-Claude Andre, Assistant U.S., Nancy Spiegel, United States Attorney, Esquire, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Jonathan D. Libby, Esquire, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Kejuan Chaviz Moore, Lancaster, CA, pro se.
Before: W. FLETCHER, RAWLINSON, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Kejuan Chaviz Moore appeals from the district court's judgment and challenges the revocation of supervised release and the 10-day term of imprisonment and 54-month term of supervised release imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Moore's counsel has-filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Moore the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.