Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JAMES EDWARD ANDERSON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2009-04-29
Citations: 228 Or. App. 237
Docket Number: 080431570; A139535
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JAMES EDWARD ANDERSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Armstrong, Judge, and Rosenblum, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 228
Pages: 237–238

Head Matter:
Submitted April 3,
compensatory fine vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed April 29, 2009
STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JAMES EDWARD ANDERSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Multnomah County Circuit Court
080431570; A139535
206 P3d 1217
Garrett A. Richardson and Multnomah Defenders, Inc., filed the brief for appellant.
John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Erika L. Hadlock, Acting Solicitor General, and Michael R. Washington, Senior Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Armstrong, Judge, and Rosenblum, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant was convicted of sexual abuse in the first degree, ORS 163.427, and two counts of failure to report as a sex offender, ORS 181.599(2), (3). He appeals the resulting judgment, assigning error to the trial court's imposition of a compensatory fine on the ground that there was no evidence that the victim suffered any pecuniary loss. See State v. Donahue, 165 Or App 143, 145, 995 P2d 1202 (2000) (holding that "a compensatory fine may be awarded only if the trial court finds that the victim has suffered pecuniary loss as a result of the defendant's criminal activities"). The state concedes that the record is legally insufficient to support the imposition of a compensatory fine. On review of the record, we agree and accept the state's concession as well founded.
Compensatory fine vacated; remanded for resen-tencing; otherwise affirmed.