Case Name: SOUL, Recr. et v. CLEARY et
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1928-10-29
Citations: 6 Ohio Law Abs. 699
Docket Number: No. 8729
Parties: SOUL, Recr. et v. CLEARY et.
Judges: (Hughes P. J., and Justice, J. of the 3rd Dist., sitting.)
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 6
Pages: 699–699

Head Matter:
SOUL, Recr. et v. CLEARY et.
Ohio Appeals, 8th Dist., Cuyahoga Co.
No. 8729.
Decided Oct. 29, 1928.
(Hughes P. J., and Justice, J. of the 3rd Dist., sitting.)
Vickery & Vickery, Cleveland, for Soul.
Gaughan & Collins, Cleveland, for Cleary, et.

Opinion:
HUGHES, PJ.
Under these circumstances, notwithstanding the sympathy which is elicited for Mrs. Cleary because of the losses occasioned by the unsuccessful business operations and other dis-sipations of the family funds by her husband, the law looks upon such a transaction as a fraud upon creditors, and hence the judgment must be for plaintiff, the costs to be paid out of funds derived from the sale which must follow this judgment.
(Justice, J., concurs.)