Case Name: In the Matter of M. A. M., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. M. A. M., Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2013-01-30
Citations: 254 Or. App. 754
Docket Number: 120768136; A152283
Parties: In the Matter of M. A. M., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. M. A. M., Appellant.
Judges: Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Duncan, Judge, and Brewer, Judge pro tempore.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 254
Pages: 754–755

Head Matter:
Submitted December 7, 2012,
reversed January 30, 2013
In the Matter of M. A. M., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. M. A. M., Appellant.
Multnomah County Circuit Court
120768136; A152283
295 P3d 693
Garrett A. Richardson and Multnomah Defenders, Inc., filed the brief for appellant.
Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General, and Carson L. Whitehead, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Duncan, Judge, and Brewer, Judge pro tempore.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. He contends that the state failed to prove, by clear and convincing evidence, that, because of a mental disorder, he is a danger to himself. ORS 426.005(l)(e)(A). He also raises an unpreserved claim of error that the trial court failed to advise him of the possible results of the commitment hearing. The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state's concession, and reverse on that basis. Accordingly, we do not address appellant's other assignment of error.
Reversed.