Case Name: In re F. P. NEWPORT CORPORATION, LIMITED. McADOO & NEBLETT v. F. P. NEWPORT CORPORATION, Limited, et al.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1938-06-07
Citations: 97 F.2d 504
Docket Number: No. 8703
Parties: In re F. P. NEWPORT CORPORATION, LIMITED. McADOO & NEBLETT v. F. P. NEWPORT CORPORATION, Limited, et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 97
Pages: 504–505

Head Matter:
In re F. P. NEWPORT CORPORATION, LIMITED. McADOO & NEBLETT v. F. P. NEWPORT CORPORATION, Limited, et al.
No. 8703.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
June 7, 1938.
Wm. H. Neblett, Harry W. Dudley, Allan H. McCurdy, and E. Walter Guthiie, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellants.
Bailie, Turner & Lake, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee Metcalf, trustee.
W. C. Shelton, George W. Burch, Jr., and Earl E. Moss, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee Security-First Nat. Bank of Los Angeles.
Before GARRECHT, MATHEWS, and HANEY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This appeal is from two orders of the District Court for Southern California, sitting as a court of bankruptcy. Timely application for allowance of the appeal was made to the District Court and to this court and was granted by both. Some of the appellees have moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the District Court did not have jurisdiction to allow it. The motion is not well founded. Jurisdiction to allow the appeal was vested either in the District Court or in this court, Bankruptcy Act, § 24, 25, 11 U.S.C.A. § 47, 48. Since both courts allowed the appeal, whether the District Court did or did not have jurisdiction to allow it is immaterial.
Motion denied.