Case Name: Joseph L. FOX, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2018-04-17
Citations: 544 S.W.3d 701
Docket Number: ED 105552
Parties: Joseph L. FOX, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 544
Pages: 701–701

Head Matter:
Joseph L. FOX, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
ED 105552
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Filed: April 17, 2018
Kristina S. Olson, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Movant/Appellant.
Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent/Respondent.
Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Kurt S. Odenwald, J.
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Joseph L. Fox appeals from the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order (judgment) of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k); Little v. State, 427 S.W.3d 846, 850 (Mo. App. E.D. 2014). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. 2015, unless otherwise indicated.