Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Juan David MUNOZ-CRUZ, Defendant - Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-02-16
Citations: 168 F. App'x 163
Docket Number: No. 04-30433
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Juan David MUNOZ-CRUZ, Defendant — Appellant.
Judges: Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 168
Pages: 163–163

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Juan David MUNOZ-CRUZ, Defendant — Appellant.
No. 04-30433.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 13, 2006.
Decided Feb. 16, 2006.
Frank Noonan, Esq., USPO-Office of the U.S. Attorney Mark O. Hatfield U.S. Courthouse, Portland, OR, for PlaintiffAppellee.
Stephen R. Sady, Esq., FPDOR-Federal Public Defender’s Office Portland, OR, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Juan David Munoz-Cruz appeals from the 57-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction to one count of illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
Because Munoz-Cruz was sentenced under the then-mandatory Sentencing Guidelines, and we cannot reliably determine from the record whether the sentence imposed would have been materially different had the district court known that the Guidelines were advisory, we remand to the sentencing court for further proceedings consistent with United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez, 419 F.3d 906, 916 (9th Cir. 2005).
REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.