Case Name: Josephine VICTORIAN and Ruth Helen Jones, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Barbara MILLER, Supervisor, et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1986-12-02
Citations: 806 F.2d 81
Docket Number: No. 85-2494
Parties: Josephine VICTORIAN and Ruth Helen Jones, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Barbara MILLER, Supervisor, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 806
Pages: 81–82

Head Matter:
Josephine VICTORIAN and Ruth Helen Jones, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Barbara MILLER, Supervisor, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 85-2494.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 2, 1986.
Jeffrey J. Skarda, Gulf Coast Legal Foundation, Houston, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellants.
Joseph W. Barbisch, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., for defendants-appel-lees.
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, HILL, and JONES, Circuit Judges.
ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion August 4, 1986, 5 Cir., 1986, 796 F.2d 94)

Opinion:
BY THE COURT:
A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc without oral argument.