Case Name: In the Matter of the Application of William Fury, Appellant, under Section 952-t of the Code of Criminal Procedure for an Order Directing the Stenographer of the Grand Jury of the 1935 November or December Term of the Court of General Sessions to Furnish Him with a Copy of the Testimony of the Complainants Michael Vitolo and Michael Vitolo, Inc., in a Proceeding Entitled People v. Furry, for Use in a Civil Action Brought by William Fury against the Said Complainants and Now Pending in the Supreme Court of New York State for the County of Bronx. The People of the State of New York, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1940-04-05
Citations: 259 A.D. 803
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Application of William Fury, Appellant, under Section 952-t of the Code of Criminal Procedure for an Order Directing the Stenographer of the Grand Jury of the 1935 November or December Term of the Court of General Sessions to Furnish Him with a Copy of the Testimony of the Complainants Michael Vitolo and Michael Vitolo, Inc., in a Proceeding Entitled People v. Furry, for Use in a Civil Action Brought by William Fury against the Said Complainants and Now Pending in the Supreme Court of New York State for the County of Bronx. The People of the State of New York, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 259
Pages: 803–803

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Application of William Fury, Appellant, under Section 952-t of the Code of Criminal Procedure for an Order Directing the Stenographer of the Grand Jury of the 1935 November or December Term of the Court of General Sessions to Furnish Him with a Copy of the Testimony of the Complainants Michael Vitolo and Michael Vitolo, Inc., in a Proceeding Entitled People v. Furry, for Use in a Civil Action Brought by William Fury against the Said Complainants and Now Pending in the Supreme Court of New York State for the County of Bronx. The People of the State of New York, Respondent.

Opinion:
Order unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., O'Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.