Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ramon Onato SALDIERNA-ROJAS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-12-27
Citations: 672 F. App'x 447
Docket Number: No. 16-40052 Summary Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ramon Onato SALDIERNA-ROJAS, Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 672
Pages: 447–447

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ramon Onato SALDIERNA-ROJAS, Defendant-Appellant
No. 16-40052 Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed December 27, 2016
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Timothy William Crooks, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant
Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Ramon Onato Saldierna-Rojas appeals the sentence imposed on his conviction for being an alien found unlawfully in the United States after having been deported following an aggravated felony conviction. Saldierna-Rojas contends that the district court committed reversible error in determining that his 2003 Georgia conviction for aggravated assault constituted a crime of violence for purposes of the enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii). As conceded by Saldierna-Rojas in his motion for summary disposition, his challenge is foreclosed by United States v. Torres-Jaime, 821 F.3d 577, 582-85 (5th Cir. 2016), petition for cert. filed (Sept. 1, 2016) (No. 16-5853).
Saldierna-Rojas's motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir.' R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.