Case Name: The State ex rel. Nelson, Appellant, v. Tubbs Jones, Pros. Atty., Appellee
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1993-10-06
Citations: 67 Ohio St. 3d 438
Docket Number: No. 93-593
Parties: The State ex rel. Nelson, Appellant, v. Tubbs Jones, Pros. Atty., Appellee.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 67
Pages: 438–438

Head Matter:
The State ex rel. Nelson, Appellant, v. Tubbs Jones, Pros. Atty., Appellee.
[Cite as State ex rel. Nelson v. Tubbs Jones (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 438.]
(No. 93-593
Submitted June 15, 1993
Decided October 6, 1993.)
Carl A. Nelson, Sr., pro se.
Stephanie Tubbs Jones, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Carol Shockley, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
While we are aware of no procedural rule that authorizes the court to dismiss a case summarily on a question of law — see State ex rel. Hanson v. Guernsey Cty. Bd. of Commrs. (1992), 65 Ohio St.3d 545, 605 N.E.2d 378 — we find on the merits that the court of appeals reached the right result and affirm its judgment based on Fenley, supra, and State ex rel. Nelson v. Fuerst (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 47, 607 N.E.2d 836.
Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur.