Case Name: Elmer SANCHEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-06-26
Citations: 675 So. 2d 263
Docket Number: No. 95-3132
Parties: Elmer SANCHEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: GUNTHER, C.J., and KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 675
Pages: 263–263

Head Matter:
Elmer SANCHEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 95-3132.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
June 26, 1996.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Allen J. DeWeese, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Joseph A. Tringali, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the revocation of appellant's probation, but remand because the written order did not set forth both of the specific violations found, although they were orally stated. Robinson v. State, 609 So.2d 89 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).
GUNTHER, C.J., and KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.