Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Philip Dale SUPINA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1970-06-22
Citations: 428 F.2d 1226
Docket Number: No. 24718
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Philip Dale SUPINA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MERRILL and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 428
Pages: 1226–1226

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Philip Dale SUPINA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 24718.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
June 22, 1970.
W. Edward Morgan, (argued) Tucson, Ariz., for defendant-appellant.
Joe Jencks, (argued) Asst. U. S. Atty., Richard K. Burke, U. S. Atty., Jo Ann D. Diamos, Asst. U. S. Atty., for plaintiffappellee.
Before MERRILL and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, District Judge.
Honorable Philip C. Wilkins, United States District Judge, Sacramento, California, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of conviction against Philip Dale Supina for refusing to submit to induction (50 U.S.C.App. § 462) is reversed.
The record discloses that this is another one of those cases in which the registrant was processed for induction as a "delinquent" by his Local Board after he failed to report for his physical examination. United States v. Stow, 427 F.2d 891 (9th Cir. filed May 27, 1970); see United States v Broyles, 427 F.2d 358 (9th Cir. filed June 8, 1970); United States v. Thomas, 422 F.2d 1327 (9th Cir. 1970).