Case Name: STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. MICHAEL S. NEIL Defendant
Court: Montana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Montana
Decision Date: 2003-03-28
Citations: 319 Mont. 14
Docket Number: No. DC-99-19
Parties: STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. MICHAEL S. NEIL Defendant,
Judges: Chairperson, Hon. Katherine R. Curtis, Member, Hon. Marc G. Buyske and Member, Hon. Gary L. Day.
Reporter: Montana Reports
Volume: 319
Pages: 14–15

Head Matter:
From: The District Court of the 10th Judicial District. County of Fergus.
STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. MICHAEL S. NEIL Defendant,
DATED this 28th day of March, 2003.
No. DC-99-19
Decision

Opinion:
On October 17,2002, the defendant was sentenced to a commitment to the Department of Corrections for the remainder of his four (4) year term, with the recommendation that defendant be placed in the Connections Corrections Program, for violations of the conditions of a suspended sentence for the offense of DUI, a felony.
On March 7, 2002, the defendant's application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
The defendant was present and was represented by Carl DeBelly. The state was not represented.
Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.
Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that "the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive." (§46-18-904(3), MCA).
The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.
Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.
Done in open Court this 7th day of March, 2003.
Chairperson, Hon. Katherine R. Curtis, Member, Hon. Marc G. Buyske and Member, Hon. Gary L. Day.