Case Name: James E. Metcalf v. State
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1952-01-09
Citations: 156 Tex. Crim. 575
Docket Number: No. 25629
Parties: James E. Metcalf v. State
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Criminal Reports
Volume: 156
Pages: 575–576

Head Matter:
James E. Metcalf v. State
No. 25629.
January 9, 1952.
Hon. A. A. Dawson, Judge Presiding.
Bert Ashby, Dallas, for appellant.
George P. Blackburn State’s Attorney, Austin, for the state.

Opinion:
MORRISON, Judge.
The offense is burglary; the punishment, four years.
No statement of facts accompanies the record.
Bill of Exception No. 1 is to the admission of testimony. There is no showing in the bill as to what the testimony com plained of was. The bill does not show that any objectionable testimony was admitted and, therefore, presents nothing for review. Tex. Dig. Crim. Law 1120(4).
Bill of Exception No. 2 seeks to attack the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. We cannot pass upon such a bill without a statement of facts.
What we have said in discussing Bill of Exception No. 2 applies to Bill of Exception No. 3, wherein appellant complains of absence of corroboration of the accomplice's testimony.
Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.