Case Name: Robert FRANKLIN, et al., Appellees, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1999-03-22
Citations: 168 F.3d 1360
Docket Number: No. 97-7162
Parties: Robert FRANKLIN, et al., Appellees, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellant.
Judges: Before EDWARDS, Chief Judge; WALD, SILBERMAN, WILLIAMS, GINSBURG, SENTELLE, HENDERSON, RANDOLPH, ROGERS, TATEL and GARLAND, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 168
Pages: 1360–1362

Head Matter:
Robert FRANKLIN, et al., Appellees, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellant.
No. 97-7162.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
March 22, 1999.
Before EDWARDS, Chief Judge; WALD, SILBERMAN, WILLIAMS, GINSBURG, SENTELLE, HENDERSON, RANDOLPH, ROGERS, TATEL and GARLAND, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellees' Petition For Rehearing En Banc and the response thereto have been circulated to the full court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular active service did not vote in favor of the petition. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is
ORDERED that the petition be denied.
Circuit Judges WALD and TATEL would grant the suggestion. Their statement is attached.
Separate statement filed by WALD and TATEL, Circuit Judges, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc.