Case Name: Sarah Gold, Respondent, v. Criterion Porter & Window Cleaning Service Corporation, Appellant, and F. W. Woolworth Co., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff; Hygiene Shower Curtain Manufacturing Co., Inc., Third-Party Defendant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1957-05-16
Citations: 3 N.Y.2d 768
Docket Number: 
Parties: Sarah Gold, Respondent, v. Criterion Porter & Window Cleaning Service Corporation, Appellant, and F. W. Woolworth Co., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff; Hygiene Shower Curtain Manufacturing Co., Inc., Third-Party Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 3
Pages: 768–768

Head Matter:
Sarah Gold, Respondent, v. Criterion Porter & Window Cleaning Service Corporation, Appellant, and F. W. Woolworth Co., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff; Hygiene Shower Curtain Manufacturing Co., Inc., Third-Party Defendant.
Argued May 6, 1957;
decided May 16, 1957.
Bernard Turkewitz for motion to dismiss appeal.
James A. Doherty, Jr., opposed.

Opinion:
Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and $10 costs of motion, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is presented on this record. Cross motion denied.