Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paris Tiwand PULLEY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-10-10
Citations: 47 F. App'x 678
Docket Number: No. 02-4262
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paris Tiwand PULLEY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 47
Pages: 678–678

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paris Tiwand PULLEY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-4262.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 27, 2002.
Decided Oct. 10, 2002.
Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, G. Alan DuBois, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Frank D. Whitney, United States Attorney, Christine Witcover Dean, Assistant United States Attorney, Anne M. Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Paris Tiwand Pulley appeals from the sixty-month sentence he received for the revocation of his supervised release. On appeal, he alleges that the sentence was unreasonable and that he should have been sentenced within the guideline range of thirty to thirty-seven months as calculated under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual ("USSG") § 7B1.4(a) (2001). We affirm Pulley's sentence as the guideline range in USSG § 7B1.4(a) is advisory only, United States v. Davis, 53 F.3d 638, 640-41 (4th Cir.1995), and the sentence imposed was not unreasonable. We dispense with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.