Case Name: Shirley Moore WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1972-10-10
Citations: 267 So. 2d 86
Docket Number: No. 72-358
Parties: Shirley Moore WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before CHARLES CARROLL, HEN-DRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 267
Pages: 86–86

Head Matter:
Shirley Moore WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 72-358.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 10, 1972.
Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and Alan S. Becker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Arnold R. Ginsberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before CHARLES CARROLL, HEN-DRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant was convicted of breaking and entering a dwelling with the intent to commit a felony, to-wit: grand larceny, also of petit larceny under an additional count of the information. She was found guilty and sentenced to a term of one year in the Dade County Jail on the breaking and entering count, and sentenced to a term of six months, to run concurrently, on the petit larceny count.
Appellant contends that the evidence introduced was circumstantial and failed to exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence, therefore, it was error for the trial court to deny her motion for judgment of acquittal.
We have carefully reviewed the record and considered the briefs of counsel and have concluded that the trial judge was correct in denying the motion of defendant. We find sufficient competent evidence in the record to support the convictions. No reversible error having been demonstrated, the judgments and sentences are affirmed.
Affirmed.