Case Name: GATES et al, Respondents, v. HORNING, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1981-12-21
Citations: 55 Or. App. 261
Docket Number: No. 77-7-31, CA 19904
Parties: GATES et al, Respondents, v. HORNING, Appellant,
Judges: Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Thornton and Van Hoomissen, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 55
Pages: 261–262

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted October 21,
affirmed December 21, 1981
reconsideration denied January 28,
petition for review denied March 2,1982 (292 Or 589)
GATES et al, Respondents, v. HORNING, Appellant,
(No. 77-7-31, CA 19904)
637 P2d 940
James R. Cartwright, Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.
Thomas K. Wolf, Tualatin, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents.
Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Thornton and Van Hoomissen, Judges.
PER CURIAM.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The issue presented in this appeal is the meaning of the term "transfer" in a confession of judgment executed by defendant and his late wife.
Defendant argues that the deed to his new wife did not constitute a "transfer." We disagree.
W.T. Rawleigh Co. v. McCoy, 96 Or 474, 190 P 311 (1920); Hammond v. Oregon etc. R.R. Co., 117 Or 244, 243 P 767, cert den 273 US 707.
Affirmed.