Case Name: Charles W. REED, III, a/k/a Dwight Devane Byrd, a/k/a Dwight Byrd, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lehrman DOTSON, Warden; Dwight Johnson, Security Chief; Tyrone Croder, Major; Phlonda Peay, Captain; Timothy Woodrum, Lieutenant; Theodore Donnell, Sergeant; Alford Dailey, R.N.; Jerry Tomlin, Officer; Theodore Donnell, Sergeant, Defendants-Appellees, and Warden McAc; Officer Tomlin, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-01-26
Citations: 409 F. App'x 663
Docket Number: No. 10-7099
Parties: Charles W. REED, III, a/k/a Dwight Devane Byrd, a/k/a Dwight Byrd, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lehrman DOTSON, Warden; Dwight Johnson, Security Chief; Tyrone Croder, Major; Phlonda Peay, Captain; Timothy Woodrum, Lieutenant; Theodore Donnell, Sergeant; Alford Dailey, R.N.; Jerry Tomlin, Officer; Theodore Donnell, Sergeant, Defendants-Appellees, and Warden McAc; Officer Tomlin, Defendants.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 409
Pages: 663–663

Head Matter:
Charles W. REED, III, a/k/a Dwight Devane Byrd, a/k/a Dwight Byrd, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lehrman DOTSON, Warden; Dwight Johnson, Security Chief; Tyrone Croder, Major; Phlonda Peay, Captain; Timothy Woodrum, Lieutenant; Theodore Donnell, Sergeant; Alford Dailey, R.N.; Jerry Tomlin, Officer; Theodore Donnell, Sergeant, Defendants-Appellees, and Warden McAc; Officer Tomlin, Defendants.
No. 10-7099.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 18, 2011.
Decided: Jan. 26, 2011.
Charles W. Reed, III, Appellant Pro Se. Nichole Cherie Gatewood, Phillip M. Pickus, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Charles W. Reed, III, appeals the district court's order denying his motion to enforce a settlement agreement, in which he alleged that the Defendants breached the settlement agreement. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Reed's motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Reed v. Dotson, No. 1:05-cv-01216-CCB (D.Md. July 21, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.