Case Name: Lori F. HICKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2004-05-28
Citations: 874 So. 2d 699
Docket Number: No. 1D03-0946
Parties: Lori F. HICKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: BENTON, J., concurs, PADOVANO, J., concurs with opinion, and WEBSTER, J., dissents with opinion.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 874
Pages: 699–701

Head Matter:
Lori F. HICKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D03-0946.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
May 28, 2004.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; Archie F. Gardner, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Charlie Crist, Attorney General; Felicia A. Wilcox, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The evidence did not establish that appellant was guilty of a willful and substantial violation of the terms of her probation. See Van Wagner v. State, 677 So.2d 314, 316 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). Appellant's sentence and the order revoking her probation are reversed and the case is remanded with directions that probation be reinstated.
Reversed and remanded.
BENTON, J., concurs, PADOVANO, J., concurs with opinion, and WEBSTER, J., dissents with opinion.