Case Name: William Hennies et al. v. Michael Vogel et ux.
Court: Illinois Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Illinois
Decision Date: 1872-09
Citations: 66 Ill. 401
Docket Number: 
Parties: William Hennies et al. v. Michael Vogel et ux.
Judges: 
Reporter: Illinois Reports
Volume: 66
Pages: 401–402

Head Matter:
William Hennies et al. v. Michael Vogel et ux.
1. Husband and wipe&emdash;wife must sue alone for personal injmy to Tier. A right of action accruing by reason of personal injuries received by a married woman is her separate property, and'to recover damages for such injury, she must sue alone. For any loss to the husband by reason of his wife’s disabilities so occasioned, he has his separate remedy.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Livingston county; the Hon. Chables H. Wood, Judge, presiding.
This was an action of trespass, brought by Michael Vogel and Mary Vogel, his wife, against the appellants, for an assault and battery, and other personal injury, alleged to have been committed upon the person of Mary Vogel, which resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of appellees for $1112.50.
Mr. Chables J. Beattie, for the appellants.
Mr. L. E. Paysoh, for the appellees.

Opinion:
Per Curiam :
This action was brought by husband and wife for personal injuries to the wife.
This court held in C. B. and Q. R. R. Co. v. Dunn, 52 Ill. 260, that a right of action arising by reason of personal injuries received by a married woman was her separate property, and to recover damages for such injuries she must sue alone. This doctrine was repeated in Hayner et al. v. Smith et al. 63 Ill. 430.
For any loss to the husband by reason of his wife's disabilities so occasioned, he has his separate remedy.
The record shows the husband had no cause of action.
The judgment of the court below is reversed.
Jicdgment reversed.