Case Name: Nathaniel Shipman et al., complainants and appellants, v. George R. Lord et al., defendants and respondents; Nathaniel Shipman et al., complainants and respondents, v. George R. Lord et al., defendants and appellants
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1900-06-18
Citations: 60 N.J. Eq. 484
Docket Number: 
Parties: Nathaniel Shipman et al., complainants and appellants, v. George R. Lord et al., defendants and respondents. Nathaniel Shipman et al., complainants and respondents, v. George R. Lord et al., defendants and appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 60
Pages: 484–485

Head Matter:
Nathaniel Shipman et al., complainants and appellants, v. George R. Lord et al., defendants and respondents. Nathaniel Shipman et al., complainants and respondents, v. George R. Lord et al., defendants and appellants.
[Filed June 18th, 1900.]
On appeal from a decree advised by Vice-Chancellor Stevens, whose opinion is reported in Shipman v. Lord, 13 Dick. Ch. Rep. 380.
Messrs. F. A. & W. T. Bay, for Shipman et al.
Mr. Wesley B. Stout, for Lord et al.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
These were cross-appeals from a decree advised by Vice-Chancellor Stevens. We think the decree right, and it is affirmed, for the reasons given by the vice-chancellor in his opinion in the court below.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Ludlow, Collins, Bogert, Hendrickson, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees — 13.
For reversal — -Hone.