Case Name: In the Matter of the Application of The People of the State of New York on the Relation of Joseph T. Brett, Respondent, for a Peremptory Writ of Mandamus against Joseph D. McGoldrick, as Comptroller of The City of New York, The Board of Estimate of The City of New York, and Joseph D. McGoldrick, Fiorello H. LaGuardia, Newbold Morris, Raymond V. Ingersoll, George U. Harvey, Stanley M. Isaacs, James H. Lyons and Joseph A. Palma, as Members of Said Board, and Kenneth Dayton, as Budget Director, and Almerindo Portfolio, as City Treasurer of The City of New York, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1938-12-23
Citations: 255 A.D. 1008
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Application of The People of the State of New York on the Relation of Joseph T. Brett, Respondent, for a Peremptory Writ of Mandamus against Joseph D. McGoldrick, as Comptroller of The City of New York, The Board of Estimate of The City of New York, and Joseph D. McGoldrick, Fiorello H. LaGuardia, Newbold Morris, Raymond V. Ingersoll, George U. Harvey, Stanley M. Isaacs, James H. Lyons and Joseph A. Palma, as Members of Said Board, and Kenneth Dayton, as Budget Director, and Almerindo Portfolio, as City Treasurer of The City of New York, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 255
Pages: 1008–1008

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Application of The People of the State of New York on the Relation of Joseph T. Brett, Respondent, for a Peremptory Writ of Mandamus against Joseph D. McGoldrick, as Comptroller of The City of New York, The Board of Estimate of The City of New York, and Joseph D. McGoldrick, Fiorello H. LaGuardia, Newbold Morris, Raymond V. Ingersoll, George U. Harvey, Stanley M. Isaacs, James H. Lyons and Joseph A. Palma, as Members of Said Board, and Kenneth Dayton, as Budget Director, and Almerindo Portfolio, as City Treasurer of The City of New York, Appellants.

Opinion:
Final order granting petitioner's application for an order under the provisions of article 78, Civil Practice Act, unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ.