Case Name: Kathy ANEMONE, et al., Appellants, v. CONCORDE CAREERS FLORIDA, INC., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-01-04
Citations: 657 So. 2d 900
Docket Number: No. 94-248
Parties: Kathy ANEMONE, et al., Appellants, v. CONCORDE CAREERS FLORIDA, INC., Appellee.
Judges: WOLF, WEBSTER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 657
Pages: 900–900

Head Matter:
Kathy ANEMONE, et al., Appellants, v. CONCORDE CAREERS FLORIDA, INC., Appellee.
No. 94-248.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jan. 4, 1995.
Scott D. Makar and Dominic MacKenzie of Holland & Knight, Jacksonville, for appellants.
Thomas F. McMorrow of Kent, Hayden, Facciolo & McMorrow, P.A., Jacksonville, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have on review a final order of dismissal against 68 of 69 plaintiffs on the ground of misjoinder of parties.
While the trial court has wide discretion to control the docket in order to ensure economic and judicial efficiency (for instance, grouping or severing claims for trial or discovery purposes), we find that dismissal was not appropriate. See rule 1.250(a), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure; Alanco v. Bystrom, 544 So.2d 217 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), rev. denied, 553 So.2d 1164 (Fla.1989).
The order of dismissal is, therefore, reversed.
WOLF, WEBSTER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.