Case Name: In the Matter of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Andrew G. Celli, as Judge of the Monroe County Court, et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 1.); In the Matter of the Monroe County Division of Pure Waters, Appellant, v. Andrew G. Celli, as Judge of the Monroe County Court, et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 2.)
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1976-09-14
Citations: 40 N.Y.2d 833
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the State of New York, Appellant, v Andrew G. Celli, as Judge of the Monroe County Court, et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of the Monroe County Division of Pure Waters, Appellant, v Andrew G. Celli, as Judge of the Monroe County Court, et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 2.)
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 40
Pages: 833–834

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the State of New York, Appellant, v Andrew G. Celli, as Judge of the Monroe County Court, et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of the Monroe County Division of Pure Waters, Appellant, v Andrew G. Celli, as Judge of the Monroe County Court, et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 2.)
Argued September 8, 1976;
decided September 14, 1976
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Thomas Mead Santoro and Ruth Kessler Toch of counsel), for State of New York, appellant.
William J. Stevens, County Attorney (Norman A. Palmiere and Dominic Pellegrino of counsel), for Monroe County Division of Pure Waters, appellant.
Lawrence T. Kurlander, District Attorney (Michael Nelson of counsel), respondent pro se.
David A. Johns for Andrew G. Celli, respondent.

Opinion:
Memorandum. Judgments dismissing the petitions affirmed, without costs. Apart from any other consideration which these appeals may suggest, the matters which gave rise to them have become moot, in substance, albeit not in form. On argument it was conceded, what was implicit anyway in the briefing, that the pending prosecutions would never be progressed. Moreover, the only reason assigned for not making motions to dismiss the indictments or to discontinue their prosecution was the existence of stays granted by this court. Those stays were vacated by oral decision in open court during the argument of the appeals. Nothing remains to deter a final resolution.
Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur in memorandum.
In each case: Judgment affirmed.