Case Name: Daniel PETERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lieutenant Ms. JAMES; Sergeant Ms. Richardson, at Nash Correctional Institution; Charles Hill, at Nash Correctional Institution; Captain Tuck, at Nash Correctional Institution, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-07-12
Citations: 232 F. App'x 363
Docket Number: No. 07-6249
Parties: Daniel PETERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lieutenant Ms. JAMES; Sergeant Ms. Richardson, at Nash Correctional Institution; Charles Hill, at Nash Correctional Institution; Captain Tuck, at Nash Correctional Institution, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 232
Pages: 363–364

Head Matter:
Daniel PETERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lieutenant Ms. JAMES; Sergeant Ms. Richardson, at Nash Correctional Institution; Charles Hill, at Nash Correctional Institution; Captain Tuck, at Nash Correctional Institution, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 07-6249.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 25, 2007.
Decided: July 12, 2007.
Daniel Peterson, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Yvette Harper, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Daniel Peterson appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the rea sons stated by the district court. Peterson v. James, No. 5:05-ct-00501-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 15, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.