Case Name: Jodie MAHAN, Petitioner/Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. Andrew MAHAN, Respondent/Appellant/Cross-Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-06-16
Citations: 974 S.W.2d 560
Docket Number: Nos. 72854, 72935
Parties: Jodie MAHAN, Petitioner/Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. Andrew MAHAN, Respondent/Appellant/Cross-Respondent.
Judges: Before GRIMM, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 974
Pages: 560–560

Head Matter:
Jodie MAHAN, Petitioner/Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. Andrew MAHAN, Respondent/Appellant/Cross-Respondent.
Nos. 72854, 72935.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
June 16, 1998.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 26, 1998.
Joseph Howlett, Clayton, for respondent/appellant/cross-respondent.
Ellen Watkins & Associates, St. Louis, petitioner/respondent/cross-appellant.
Before GRIMM, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
In this dissolution case, the trial court dissolved the parties' marriage, divided the marital property, and awarded wife legal custody of the children. Husband appeals, raising four points and wife cross-appeals, raising one point.
We have reviewed the briefs, legal file, and transcript. The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. Rule 84.16(b).
The trial court's judgment is affirmed.
Husband's appellate counsel was not his trial counsel.