Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. William F. ROWE, Jr., Defendant/Appellant; William F. ROWE, Jr., Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-11-21
Citations: 910 S.W.2d 788
Docket Number: Nos. 66214, 68186
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. William F. ROWE, Jr., Defendant/Appellant. William F. ROWE, Jr., Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL, J., and RONNIE L. WHITE, Special Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 910
Pages: 788–788

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. William F. ROWE, Jr., Defendant/Appellant. William F. ROWE, Jr., Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Nos. 66214, 68186.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Nov. 21, 1995.
David Simpson, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL, J., and RONNIE L. WHITE, Special Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of one count of first degree robbery, § 569.020, RSMo 1986, and one count of armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo 1986. The court sentenced defendant as a class X offender to concurrent prison terms of eighteen years on each count. Defendant also appeals the denial, without an evidentia-ry hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).