Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Patrick Floyd WILSON, a/k/a Little Patrick, a/k/a Anthony Wilson, a/k/a Anthony Brown, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-02-28
Citations: 468 F. App'x 325
Docket Number: No. 11-7662
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Patrick Floyd WILSON, a/k/a Little Patrick, a/k/a Anthony Wilson, a/k/a Anthony Brown, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 468
Pages: 325–326

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Patrick Floyd WILSON, a/k/a Little Patrick, a/k/a Anthony Wilson, a/k/a Anthony Brown, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 11-7662.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 23, 2012.
Decided: Feb. 28, 2012.
Patrick Floyd Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Timothy J. Heaphy, United States Attorney, Thomas Jack Bondurant, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Patrick Floyd Wilson appeals the district court's order denying his Fed. R.Crim.P. 36 motion to correct a clerical error in the judgment issued following his resentencing. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Wilson, No. 5:96-cr-30056-MFU-1 (W.D.Va. Nov. 23, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.