Case Name: Saundra K. LEWIS, and Kevin Lewis, a minor, By and Through his natural guardian, Saundra K. Lewis, Appellants, v. Scott KRANZ, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-05-26
Citations: 599 So. 2d 253
Docket Number: No. 91-1455
Parties: Saundra K. LEWIS, and Kevin Lewis, a minor, By and Through his natural guardian, Saundra K. Lewis, Appellants, v. Scott KRANZ, Appellee.
Judges: Before BASKIN, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 599
Pages: 253–253

Head Matter:
Saundra K. LEWIS, and Kevin Lewis, a minor, By and Through his natural guardian, Saundra K. Lewis, Appellants, v. Scott KRANZ, Appellee.
No. 91-1455.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 26, 1992.
Ponzoli, Wassenberg & Sperkacz and Zo-rian Sperkacz and Ronald Ponzoli, Miami, for appellants.
Gilbride, Heller & Brown and Michael R. Gibbons, Miami, for appellee.
Before BASKIN, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This case is controlled by principles enunciated in Nessim v. DeLoache, 384 So.2d 1341 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), where we held that the issue of fraud is not ordinarily a proper subject for summary judgment because, being a subtle matter, proving the cause of action may require a full explanation of the facts and circumstances of the alleged wrong to permit a determination whether they collectively constitute fraud. It is not established conclusively in the record that the appellee Kranz, as an agent of the defrauding principal, was not a participant in a conspiracy to defraud. See Karnegis v. Oakes, 296 So.2d 657 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974), cert. denied, 307 So.2d 450 (Fla.1975).
Reversed and remanded.