Case Name: Gus HNARAKIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-11-02
Citations: 204 F. App'x 181
Docket Number: No. 06-1478
Parties: Gus HNARAKIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 204
Pages: 181–181

Head Matter:
Gus HNARAKIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 06-1478.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 31, 2006.
Decided: Nov. 2, 2006.
Gus Hnarakis, Appellant Pro Se. James A. Frederick, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Gus Hnarakis appeals the district court's order substituting the United States as the Defendant and dismissing Hnarakis's action for return of property, under the Federal Tort Claims Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hnarakis v. United States, No. 8:06-cv-00557-DKC (D.Md. Apr. 11, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.