Case Name: In the Matter of the Application of Lizzie Dworsky, Respondent, for a Peremptory Mandamus Order against Harry G. Coplon, as Corporation Counsel of the City of Schenectady, N. Y., and Another, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1926-01
Citations: 215 A.D. 855
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Application of Lizzie Dworsky, Respondent, for a Peremptory Mandamus Order against Harry G. Coplon, as Corporation Counsel of the City of Schenectady, N. Y., and Another, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 215
Pages: 855–855

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Application of Lizzie Dworsky, Respondent, for a Peremptory Mandamus Order against Harry G. Coplon, as Corporation Counsel of the City of Schenectady, N. Y., and Another, Appellants.

Opinion:
Order reversed on the law, with costs, and motion denied, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements, on the ground that the petition does not disclose that the petitioner has a legal claim. All concur.