Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis CARBARCAS-A, a/k/a Lucho, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-01-12
Citations: 1 F. App'x 223
Docket Number: No. 00-6768
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis CARBARCAS-A, a/k/a Lucho, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 1
Pages: 223–223

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis CARBARCAS-A, a/k/a Lucho, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 00-6768.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 20, 2000.
Decided Jan. 12, 2001.
Cheryl J. Sturm, Chaddsford, PA, for appellant. Mark T. Calloway, United States Attorney, Frank D. Whitney, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, NC, for appellee.
Before MICHAEL, DIANA GIBBON MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Luis Carbarcas appeals the district's court order denying his Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(a) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Rule 35(a) is not available to correct errors at trial prior to the imposition of sentence. Hill v. United States, 368 U.S. 424, 430, 82 S.Ct. 468, 7 L.Ed.2d 417 (1962). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Carbarcas-A, No. CR-85-62-P (W.D.N.C. May 8, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.