Case Name: In the Matter of the Arbitration between Shirley Silk Co., Inc., Respondent, and American Silk Mills, Inc., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1940-11-22
Citations: 260 A.D. 572
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Arbitration between Shirley Silk Co., Inc., Respondent, and American Silk Mills, Inc., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 260
Pages: 572–573

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Arbitration between Shirley Silk Co., Inc., Respondent, and American Silk Mills, Inc., Appellant.
First Department,
November 22, 1940.
Henry I. Fillman of counsel [Leonard Acker with him on the brief; Henry I. Fillman, attorney], for the appellant.
Otto A. Samuels, for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We think that Granowitz, the arbitrator designated by petitioner-respondent, should have revealed to appellant that fourteen months before the arbitration herein the firm of which he is now and was then president, in another arbitration
proceeding, had received an award of over $31,000 from a board of arbitrators of which the president of the petitioner-respondent was one. The failure to disclose this fact requires that this award be set aside. (See Matter of Knickerbocker T. Corp. v. Sheila-Lynn, Inc., 172 Misc. 1015; affd., 259 App. Div. 992.) The parties must proceed to a new arbitration pursuant to the terms of their written agreement.
The order appealed from should, accordingly, be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, the motion to confirm denied, and the motion to vacate the award granted.
Present — Martin, P. J., O'Malley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
Order unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, the motion to confirm the award denied, and the motion to vacate the award granted.