Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Corey Antione WILLIAMS, a/k/a Henry Ronald Bookman, a/k/a Corey Antoine Williams, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-12-17
Citations: 358 F. App'x 393
Docket Number: No. 09-6835
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Corey Antione WILLIAMS, a/k/a Henry Ronald Bookman, a/k/a Corey Antoine Williams, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 358
Pages: 393–393

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Corey Antione WILLIAMS, a/k/a Henry Ronald Bookman, a/k/a Corey Antoine Williams, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-6835.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 15, 2009.
Decided: Dec. 17, 2009.
Mark Patrick Foster, Jr., Law Offices of Mark Foster, PC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Ashe-ville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Corey Antione Williams appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Williams, No. 3:01-cr-00031-FDW-13 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 16, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.