Case Name: James E. YOUNG, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1978-06-22
Citations: 360 So. 2d 425
Docket Number: No. 53116
Parties: James E. YOUNG, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: OVERTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, SUNDBERG and HATCHETT, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 360
Pages: 425–425

Head Matter:
James E. YOUNG, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 53116.
Supreme Court of Florida.
June 22, 1978.
Alan H. Schreiber, Public Defender, and Stuart M. Lerner, Asst. Public Defender, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Joy B. Shearer, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The petition for certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ.
Upon further consideration of the cause and our recent opinion in Henry v. State, Case No. 52,705, 359 So.2d 864 (Fla., filed June 1, 1978), we conclude that no direct conflict of decisions exists as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.
It is so ordered.
OVERTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, SUNDBERG and HATCHETT, JJ., concur.