Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Anthony SALERNO, a/k/a "Fat Tony," Vincent Di Napoli, a/k/a "Vinnie", Louis Di Napoli, a/k/a "Louie", Matthew Ianniello, a/k/a "Matty the Horse", John Tronolone, a/k/a "Peanuts", Milton Rockman, a/k/a "Maishe", Nicholas Auletta, a/k/a "Nick", Edward J. Halloran, a/k/a "Biff", Alvin O. Chattin, a/k/a "Al", Richard Costa, a/k/a "Richie", and Aniello Migliore, a/k/a "Neil", Defendants, Matthew Ianniello, a/k/a "Matty the Horse", Vincent Di Napoli, a/k/a "Vinnie", Louis Di Napoli, a/k/a "Louie", Nicholas Auletta, a/k/a "Nick", Edward J. Halloran, a/k/a "Biff", Aniello Migliore, a/k/a "Neil", Anthony Salerno, a/k/a "Fat Tony", and Alvin O. Chattin, a/k/a "Al", Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1991-11-20
Citations: 952 F.2d 624
Docket Number: Docket Nos. 88-1464, 88-1470 to 88-1474, 88-1477, 88-1547, 90-1291, 90-1292, 90-1296, 90-1297, 90-1301, 90-1311, 90-1312, 90-1351
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Anthony SALERNO, a/k/a “Fat Tony,” Vincent Di Napoli, a/k/a “Vinnie”, Louis Di Napoli, a/k/a “Louie”, Matthew Ianniello, a/k/a “Matty the Horse”, John Tronolone, a/k/a “Peanuts”, Milton Rockman, a/k/a “Maishe”, Nicholas Auletta, a/k/a “Nick”, Edward J. Halloran, a/k/a “Biff", Alvin O. Chattin, a/k/a “Al”, Richard Costa, a/k/a “Richie”, and Aniello Migliore, a/k/a “Neil”, Defendants, Matthew Ianniello, a/k/a “Matty the Horse”, Vincent Di Napoli, a/k/a “Vinnie”, Louis Di Napoli, a/k/a “Louie”, Nicholas Auletta, a/k/a “Nick”, Edward J. Halloran, a/k/a “Biff", Aniello Migliore, a/k/a “Neil”, Anthony Salerno, a/k/a “Fat Tony”, and Alvin O. Chattin, a/k/a “Al”, Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: (with whom KEARSE, MAHONEY, and WALKER, Circuit Judges, join), dissenting from denial of rehearing in banc:
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 952
Pages: 624–626

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Anthony SALERNO, a/k/a “Fat Tony,” Vincent Di Napoli, a/k/a “Vinnie”, Louis Di Napoli, a/k/a “Louie”, Matthew Ianniello, a/k/a “Matty the Horse”, John Tronolone, a/k/a “Peanuts”, Milton Rockman, a/k/a “Maishe”, Nicholas Auletta, a/k/a “Nick”, Edward J. Halloran, a/k/a “Biff", Alvin O. Chattin, a/k/a “Al”, Richard Costa, a/k/a “Richie”, and Aniello Migliore, a/k/a “Neil”, Defendants, Matthew Ianniello, a/k/a “Matty the Horse”, Vincent Di Napoli, a/k/a “Vinnie”, Louis Di Napoli, a/k/a “Louie”, Nicholas Auletta, a/k/a “Nick”, Edward J. Halloran, a/k/a “Biff", Aniello Migliore, a/k/a “Neil”, Anthony Salerno, a/k/a “Fat Tony”, and Alvin O. Chattin, a/k/a “Al”, Defendants-Appellants.
Docket Nos. 88-1464, 88-1470 to 88-1474, 88-1477, 88-1547, 90-1291, 90-1292, 90-1296, 90-1297, 90-1301, 90-1311, 90-1312, 90-1351.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Nov. 20, 1991.
Alan M. Cohen, Mark R. Hellerer, Asst. U.S. Attys., S.D.N.Y., New York City (Otto G. Obermaier, U.S. Atty., Jonathan Leib-man, Daniel Nardello, Cathy Seibel, Daniel C. Richman, Asst. U.S. Attys., S.D.N.Y., of counsel), for appellee.
Jay Goldberg, New York City (Judd Bur-stein, of counsel), for defendant-appellant Matthew Ianniello.
Michael E. Tigar, Austin, Tex. (Newman & Schwartz, Gustave H. Newman, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellant Vincent Di Napoli.
Robert L. Ellis, New York City, for defendant-appellant Louis Di Napoli.
Herbert J. Miller, Jr., Washington, D.C. (Miller, Cassidy, Larroca & Lewin, Stephen L. Braga, Edith R. Lampson, of counsel), for defendant-appellant Nicholas Auletta.
Frederick P. Hafetz, New York City (Goldman & Hafetz, Susan R. Necheles, Christy & Viener, Arthur H. Christy, Maria T. Galeno, Toll, Ebby, Langer & Marvin, Peter F. Marvin, Philadelphia, Pa., Jeremy Gutman, of counsel), for defendant-appellant Edward J. Halloran.
Walter P. Loughlin, New York City, for defendant-appellant Aniello Migliore.
Judd Burstein, New York City (John Jacobs, of counsel), for defendant-appellant Anthony Salerno.
Patrick M. Wall, New York City, for defendant-appellant Alvin 0. Chattin.

Opinion:
A petition for rehearing containing a suggestion that the action be reheard en banc having been filed herein by appellee, United States of America.
The panel that heard the appeal having denied rehearing by order dated September 24, 1991, 937 F.2d 797, and upon further consideration having amended its opinion by order dated November 6, 1991, 952 F.2d 623, and a poll having been requested and taken subsequent to the entry of the September 24, 1991, order,
It is Hereby Ordered that the final paragraph of the September 24, 1991, order with respect to the suggestion for rehearing en banc is amended to read:
It is further noted that the suggestion for rehearing en banc having been transmitted to the judges of the court in regular active service and at the request of such a judge, a poll of the judges in regular active service having been taken, a majority has voted not to reconsider the matter en banc. Judge Newman dissents from the denial of en banc reconsideration in an opinion concurred in by Judges Kearse, Mahoney and Walker.