Case Name: Micah C. FORTNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-06-23
Citations: 761 So. 2d 1175
Docket Number: No. 2D99-2658
Parties: Micah C. FORTNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: GREEN, A.C.J., and DANAHY, PAUL W., (Senior) Judge, Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 761
Pages: 1175–1176

Head Matter:
Micah C. FORTNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D99-2658.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
June 23, 2000.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Bruce P. Taylor, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robert J. Krauss, Sr., Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

Opinion:
CASANUEVA, Judge.
In this Anders appeal we agree with the appellant's counsel that there are no meritorious issues requiring reversal. Appellant has requested, however, that we remand the case for clarification of the Order-of Community Control Followed by Probation so that it conforms more precisely to the trial court's oral pronouncement of a special condition concerning drug treatment. The State has no objection to a remand for that purpose. Therefore, we remand for the trial court to modify the Order of Community Control Followed by Probation as follows: "All original terms remain in effect, except that drug treatment recommendations are limited to outpatient treatment. The defendant is to comply with all outpatient treatment as recommended."
Affirmed, but remanded for clarification of Order of Community Control Followed by Probation.
GREEN, A.C.J., and DANAHY, PAUL W., (Senior) Judge, Concur.
. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).