Case Name: Hubert POWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1990-06-29
Citations: 792 S.W.2d 55
Docket Number: No. 57216
Parties: Hubert POWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 792
Pages: 55–55

Head Matter:
Hubert POWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 57216.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
June 29, 1990.
Thomas Richard Motley, Robert D. Schollmeyer, Hannibal, for appellant.
William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., M. Melissa Manda, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Hubert Powell, appeals the motion court's denial of his Rule 27.26 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed appellant's allegations of error, the entire record upon which they are based, and the findings and conclusions of the motion court. We do not find the court's action to be clearly erroneous and find that an extended opinion would have no precedential value. We, therefore, affirm the court's dismissal pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, which sets forth the basis of the court's decision.