Case Name: Arthur Furber, App'lt, v. Alexander McCarthy et al., Resp'ts
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1889-01-28
Citations: 21 N.Y. St. Rep. 219
Docket Number: 
Parties: Arthur Furber, App’lt, v. Alexander McCarthy et al., Resp’ts.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 21
Pages: 219–219

Head Matter:
Arthur Furber, App’lt, v. Alexander McCarthy et al., Resp’ts.
(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department,
Filed January 28, 1889.)
Practice—Statements in decision op court—Code Civ. Pro., § 1022.
The decision of a court upon the trial of an issue of fact must contain the facts found and the conclusions of law stated separately; a reference to another paper as containing the facts found is not sufficient.
Appeal from judgment dismissing complaint.
A. Furber, app’lt in person; E. P. Johnson, for resp’ts.

Opinion:
Van Brunt, P. J.
The record in this case contains no such statement of the facts found by the court as is contemplated by section 1022 of the Code. It is evidently intended that the decision of the court shall contain the facts found and the conclusions of law stated separately, and that a reference to another paper in such decision as containing the facts found is no compliance with the provisions of the section.
Under these circumstances the appeal from the judgment entered cannot be considered by this court, and the same must be stricken from the calendar.
Macomber and Brady, JJ., concur.