Case Name: LONG DOCK COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. STATE BOARD OF TAXES AND ASSESSMENT, ETC., RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1917-05-24
Citations: 90 N.J.L. 701
Docket Number: 
Parties: LONG DOCK COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. STATE BOARD OF TAXES AND ASSESSMENT, ETC., RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 90
Pages: 701–701

Head Matter:
LONG DOCK COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. STATE BOARD OF TAXES AND ASSESSMENT, ETC., RESPONDENT.
Argued March 13, 1917
Decided May 24, 1917.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 89 N. J. L. 1.08.
(In re reassessments on second-class property for 1911.)
For the appellant, Collins & Corbin.
For the respondent, John W. Wescott, attorney-general, John Bentley and John B. Hardin.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Legal questions were first dealt with in the opinion of Mr. Justice Parker in the court below, so as to lay a foundation for the consideration of the facts, and those questions were, in our opinion, rightly decided. As there was evidence to support the finding of facts made by the Supreme Court, that finding is not reviewahle-in this court.
The judgment under review will be affirmed.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Black, White, Heppbniteimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 11.
For reversal—Hone.