Case Name: Arthur Kreusi et al., Respondents, v. City of New York et al., Respondents, Herman Miller, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1994-03-14
Citations: 202 A.D.2d 478
Docket Number: 
Parties: Arthur Kreusi et al., Respondents, v City of New York et al., Respondents, Herman Miller, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 202
Pages: 478–479

Head Matter:
Arthur Kreusi et al., Respondents, v City of New York et al., Respondents, Herman Miller, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendant.
[610 NYS2d 795]

Opinion:
—Appeal by the defendant Herman Miller from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Greenstein, J.), dated April 14, 1992.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs, for reasons stated by Justice Greenstein in the Supreme Court. Sullivan, J. P., Miller, O'Brien and Krausman, JJ., concur.