Case Name: Darryl WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. Nancy LEBEAU, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2008-08-29
Citations: 988 So. 2d 1276
Docket Number: No. 5D07-238
Parties: Darryl WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. Nancy LEBEAU, Appellee.
Judges: PLEUS, ORFINGER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 988
Pages: 1276–1277

Head Matter:
Darryl WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. Nancy LEBEAU, Appellee.
No. 5D07-238.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Aug. 29, 2008.
Robert L. Sirianni, Jr., of Brownstone, P.A., Winter Park, for Appellant.
Nancy Lebeau, St. Cloud, Pro Se.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Darryl Williams appeals an injunction for protection entered against him. We reverse.
Because of a technical problem with the trial court's digital recording equipment, a significant portion of the evidence was not recorded. As a result, through no fault of the parties, the transcript of the proceedings is incomplete. Unfortunately, the missing portions of the transcript are nee- essary for a complete review of the issues raised on appeal. As a result, we have no alternative but to remand this matter for a new hearing. See Jones v. State, 780 So.2d 218 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
PLEUS, ORFINGER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
. The parties were unable to agree on a statement of the evidence, as authorized by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b)(4). Additionally, the trial judge was unable to recollect the evidence.