Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. RODRICK WARREN SMITH, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1993-08-25
Citations: 122 Or. App. 630
Docket Number: CR92-112; CA A75497
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. RODRICK WARREN SMITH, Appellant.
Judges: Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and Durham and Leeson, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 122
Pages: 630–631

Head Matter:
Submitted on record and briefs July 27,
reversed and remanded for trial August 25, 1993
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. RODRICK WARREN SMITH, Appellant.
(CR92-112; CA A75497)
856 P2d 646
Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, and Dan Maloney, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, filed the brief for appellant.
Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Thomas H. Denney, Assistant Attorney General, and Amanda Buttress, Certified Law Student, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and Durham and Leeson, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant appeals his conviction for second degree criminal mischief, ORS 164.354, assigning error to the entry of the judgment of conviction based on his plea of guilty and to the sentence imposed as a result of the conviction. He argues, and the state concedes, that, because the record contains no evidence that he entered a guilty plea, entry of the judgment of conviction based on the plea was error. We accept the state's concession. ORS 135.385 to ORS 135.395; Stelts v. State of Oregon, 299 Or 252, 701 P2d 1047 (1985).
Reversed and remanded for trial.