Case Name: In the Matter of Gregory Mead, Appellant, v. Judith Levitt, as Director of the Department of Personnel of the City of New York, et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1989-05-04
Citations: 74 N.Y.2d 634
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Gregory Mead, Appellant, v Judith Levitt, as Director of the Department of Personnel of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 74
Pages: 634–636

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Gregory Mead, Appellant, v Judith Levitt, as Director of the Department of Personnel of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.
Argued March 21, 1989;
decided May 4, 1989
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
John J. Maguire for appellant.
Peter Zimroth, Corporation Counsel (Jane S. Earle and Francis F. Caputo of counsel), for respondents.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
We agree with the Appellate Division's statement, in its order granting leave to appeal, that the issues addressed by petitioner in his appellate brief are unpreserved and are, therefore, beyond the scope of our review.
Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur; Judge Kaye taking no part.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.