Case Name: Whitson v. Haniel-Clark & Son
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1923-07-11
Citations: 30 Ga. App. 625
Docket Number: 14212
Parties: Whitson v. Haniel-Clark & Son.
Judges: Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 30
Pages: 625–625

Head Matter:
14212.
Whitson v. Haniel-Clark & Son.
Decided July 11, 1923.
Attachment; from Bryan superior court — Judge Strange. November 27, 1922.
J. P. Dukes, for plaintiff. Brannen & Booth, for defendants.

Opinion:
Bloodworth, J.
" The mere fact that there are eoniliets in the testimony-does not render the direction of a verdict in favor of a party erroneous, when it appears that the conflicts are immaterial, and that, giving to the opposite party the benefit of the most favorable view of the evidence as a whole and of all legitimate inferences therefrom, the verdict against him is demanded. Sanders Mfg. Co. v. Dollar Savings Bank, 110 Ga. 559." Skinner v. Braswell, 126 Ga. 761 (2) (55 S. E. 914). Under the principle announced above the court did not err in directing a verdict in favor of the defendant.
Judgment affirmed.
Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.