Case Name: S. L. DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, RESPONDENT, v. SAMUEL R. LADEN, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1924-03-03
Citations: 99 N.J.L. 525
Docket Number: 
Parties: S. L. DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, RESPONDENT, v. SAMUEL R. LADEN, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 99
Pages: 525–525

Head Matter:
S. L. DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, RESPONDENT, v. SAMUEL R. LADEN, APPELLANT.
Submitted December 10, 1923
Decided March 3, 1924.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion was reported sub nomine lieinfeld v. Laden, 98 N. J. L. 709.
For the appellant, Harold Simandl.
For the respondent, Benjamin M. Weinberg.

Opinion:
Pee Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Black in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chan cellos, Chief Justice, Trengharb, Parker, Minturn, Campbell, Heppenheimee, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, JJ. 10.
For reversal — FTone.