Case Name: David I. NAMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-09-12
Citations: 487 F. App'x 324
Docket Number: No. 12-1937
Parties: David I. NAMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 487
Pages: 324–325

Head Matter:
David I. NAMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 12-1937.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 6, 2012.
Filed: Sept. 12, 2012.
David I. Namer, Forrest City, AR, pro se.
Richard M. Pence, Jr., U.S. Attorney’s Office, Little Rock, AR, for Defendant Appellee.
Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Federal inmate David Namer appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment in his action brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act. Upon de novo review, see Meuir v. Greene Cnty. Jail Emps., 487 F.3d 1115, 1118 (8th Cir.2007), we agree that summary judgment was proper for the reasons the district court stated. To the extent Namer challenges any of the district court's discovery rulings, we conclude the court did not abuse its discretion. See id. at 1120. Ac cordingly, we affirm the judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Jerome T. Kearney, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).