Case Name: FRANCIS P. CONROY, et al., etc., v. CARDELE BROWER, et al., etc.
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1948-06-15
Citations: 160 Fla. 579
Docket Number: 
Parties: FRANCIS P. CONROY, et al., etc., v. CARDELE BROWER, et al., etc.
Judges: THOMAS, C. J., CHAPMAN, ADAMS and HOBSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 160
Pages: 579–579

Head Matter:
FRANCIS P. CONROY, et al., etc., v. CARDELE BROWER, et al., etc.
36 So. (2nd) 190
June 15, 1948
June Term, 1948
En Banc
Edwin C. Coffee, for appellant.
Austin Miller, for appellee.

Opinion:
TERRELL, J.:
At the oral argument this case and the case of Milton Weiss, et al. v. Herberta Leonardy, et al., were consolidated and argued together. The latter case was decided this date. The parties were different and both cases arose from a different source but they were prosecuted under Section 87.01, Florida Statutes 1941, for a common purpose and a similar decree resulted. The questions raised in this case are similar to those presented in Milton Weiss, et al., v. Herberta Leonardy, et al., so the judgment appealed from is affirmed on authority of the latter case.
Affirmed.
THOMAS, C. J., CHAPMAN, ADAMS and HOBSON, JJ., concur.
SEBRING and BARNS, JJ., dissent.