Case Name: Elizabeth Jackson et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. George Brooks, Appellant-Respondent, and Phoebe Horning, Respondent; Evelyn Rulison et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. George Brooks, Appellant-Respondent, and Phoebe Horning, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1965-03-12
Citations: 23 A.D.2d 711
Docket Number: 
Parties: Elizabeth Jackson et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. George Brooks, Appellant-Respondent, and Phoebe Horning, Respondent. Evelyn Rulison et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. George Brooks, Appellant-Respondent, and Phoebe Horning, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 23
Pages: 711–711

Head Matter:
Elizabeth Jackson et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. George Brooks, Appellant-Respondent, and Phoebe Horning, Respondent. Evelyn Rulison et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. George Brooks, Appellant-Respondent, and Phoebe Horning, Respondent.

Opinion:
Memorandum by the Court. The verdicts were clearly warranted by the evidence. Whether or not the objection to the reception of proof allegedly at variance with the bill of particulars was well taken, there was no exception to the charge whereby the issue seems to have been submitted, nor was there any request for its clarification. Judgments affirmed, with costs to plaintiffs-respondents. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.