Case Name: Ricardo DIAZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1984-01-31
Citations: 445 So. 2d 619
Docket Number: No. 83-1666
Parties: Ricardo DIAZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARK-DULL and HUBBART, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 445
Pages: 619–619

Head Matter:
Ricardo DIAZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 83-1666.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan. 31, 1984.
Rehearing Denied March 12, 1984.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and John H. Lipinski, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Jack B. Ludin, Asst. Public Defender, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARK-DULL and HUBBART, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The order revoking probation, which is under review by this appeal, is affirmed with one modification, to wit: the finding in the revocation order that the appellant failed to report to his probation officer is stricken as it does not conform to the trial court's oral pronouncement at the conclusion of the probation hearing. In all other respects, however, the order revoking probation is affirmed as the appellant's motion to suppress was properly denied by the trial court. Council v. State, 442 So.2d 1072 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).
Affirmed as modified.