Case Name: H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY and John Dyer, individually and as Contracting Officer for Metropolitan Dade County, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1993-08-09
Citations: 998 F.2d 892
Docket Number: No. 90-5678
Parties: H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY and John Dyer, individually and as Contracting Officer for Metropolitan Dade County, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before HATCHETT and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges, and HILL, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 998
Pages: 892–893

Head Matter:
H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY and John Dyer, individually and as Contracting Officer for Metropolitan Dade County, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 90-5678.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Aug. 9, 1993.
Charles C. Kline, Miami, FL, for plaintiff-appellant.
Robert A. Cuevas, Jr., Asst. County Atty., Miami, FL, for defendants-appellees.
Before HATCHETT and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges, and HILL, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
BY THE COURT:
The parties joint motion to withdraw the petition for rehearing and suggestion of rehearing en bane, to vacate panel opinion and to remand based on settlement agreement is GRANTED. The panel opinion, published at 975 F.2d 762 (11th Cir.1992) is VACATED. The judgment of the district court is VACATED and the ease is REMANDED to the district court with instructions that the ease be dismissed. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).