Case Name: Allen GRANT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2005-12-28
Citations: 917 So. 2d 990
Docket Number: No. 3D05-953
Parties: Allen GRANT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before COPE, C.J., and SHEPHERD and ROTHENBERG, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 917
Pages: 990–991

Head Matter:
Allen GRANT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D05-953.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 28, 2005.
Marvin D. Wilson, for appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Valentina M. Tejera, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before COPE, C.J., and SHEPHERD and ROTHENBERG, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
While we affirm on the merits, we additionally note that in support of the defendant's argument below he relied on State v. Finder, 375 So.2d 836 (Fla.1979), and Goss v. State, 398 So.2d 998 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). In response, the State argued that, there were factual distinctions between the cited cases and the present case, and the trial court agreed. The cases relied upon by the defendant however, are no longer good law. See State v. Enmund, 476 So.2d 165 (Fla.1985).
Affirmed.