Case Name: Gerri L. ZSCHETZSCHE, Petitioner/Respondent, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2010-11-30
Citations: 326 S.W.3d 575
Docket Number: No. ED 94296
Parties: Gerri L. ZSCHETZSCHE, Petitioner/Respondent, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 326
Pages: 575–576

Head Matter:
Gerri L. ZSCHETZSCHE, Petitioner/Respondent, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 94296.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Nov. 30, 2010.
James A. Chenault, III, Special Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for appellant.
Lawrence E. Wines, St. Peters, MO, for respondent.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The Director of Revenue appeals from the trial court's judgment reinstating the driving privileges of petitioner, Gerri L. Zschetzsche, after the Director suspended them pursuant to section 302.505 RSMo (Cum.Supp.2006). The judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).