Case Name: Leslie G. Loomis and Leslie G. Loomis, Jr., Copartners, under the Firm Name of L. G. Loomis & Son, Respondents, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1912-11
Citations: 153 A.D. 938
Docket Number: 
Parties: Leslie G. Loomis and Leslie G. Loomis, Jr., Copartners, under the Firm Name of L. G. Loomis & Son, Respondents, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 153
Pages: 938–938

Head Matter:
Leslie G. Loomis and Leslie G. Loomis, Jr., Copartners, under the Firm Name of L. G. Loomis & Son, Respondents, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.

Opinion:
Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that the words " Grand St." in the bill of lading indicate the address of the consignee, and the fact that there is a Grand street freight yard does hot create an ambiguity sufficient to justify submitting to the jury the question of whether the words ' ' Grand St. " were used to designate such freight yard as a place of delivery. All concurred, except Kruse and Robson, JJ., who dissented.