Case Name: B. MACON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. E.I. DUPONT, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-04-09
Citations: 471 F. App'x 125
Docket Number: No. 11-2245
Parties: B. MACON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. E.I. DUPONT, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 471
Pages: 125–126

Head Matter:
B. MACON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. E.I. DUPONT, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 11-2245.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 30, 2012.
Decided: April 9, 2012.
B. Macon, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher M. Michalik, Briton Katherine Nelson, McGuirewoods, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
B. Macon appeals the magistrate judge's order granting DuPont's motion for summary judgment and dismissing his employ ment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Macon v. DuPont, No. 3:10-cv-00260-MHL, 2011 WL 4925083 (E.D.Va. Oct. 17, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2006), the parties consented to have the case heard by a magistrate judge.