Case Name: Heide M. Hess JONES, Petitioner, v. Curtis Lee JONES, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-09-30
Citations: 624 So. 2d 263
Docket Number: No. 80809
Parties: Heide M. Hess JONES, Petitioner, v. Curtis Lee JONES, Respondent.
Judges: BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 624
Pages: 263–263

Head Matter:
Heide M. Hess JONES, Petitioner, v. Curtis Lee JONES, Respondent.
No. 80809.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Sept. 30, 1993.
Jeffrey L. Dees, Dunn, Abraham, Swain & Dees, Daytona Beach, for petitioner.
Peter Keating, Daytona Beach, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We review Jones v. Jones, 606 So.2d 748 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992), based on conflict of decisions. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. We recently resolved the conflict in Mize v. Mize, 621 So.2d 417 (Fla.1993). On the authority of Mize, we quash the decision of the district court of appeal; we remand the case to that court for reconsideration in light of our opinion in Mize.
It is so ordered.
BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.