Case Name: In the Matter of Deandre T. D. Williams, Also Known as David Williams, Petitioner, v. James R. Cowhey, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1995-01-17
Citations: 211 A.D.2d 683
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Deandre T. D. Williams, Also Known as David Williams, Petitioner, v James R. Cowhey, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 211
Pages: 683–683

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Deandre T. D. Williams, Also Known as David Williams, Petitioner, v James R. Cowhey, Respondent.
[622 NYS2d 461]

Opinion:
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent Justice of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, to calendar and decide the petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus.
Upon the petition and papers filed in support of the proceeding, and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act, and only when there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought (see, Matter of Legal Aid Socy. v Scheinman, 53 NY2d 12, 16). The petitioner here has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Miller, J. P., Lawrence, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.