Case Name: James ANDERSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2015-09-15
Citations: 477 S.W.3d 116
Docket Number: No. ED 101638
Parties: James ANDERSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 477
Pages: 116–116

Head Matter:
James ANDERSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 101638
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Filed: September 15, 2015
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied October 22, 2015.
Application for Transfer Denied December 22, 2015
Edward S. Thompson, Public Defenders Office, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101, for Appellant.
Dora A. Fichter, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65109, for Respondent.
Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
James Anderson (Movant) appeals the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. In seven points on appeal, Movant claims the motion court erred by denying his post-conviction motion because he established that trial and appellate counsel were ineffective. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying post-conviction relief. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. Rule 84.16(b).