Case Name: Lula M. FAISON, Appellant, v. William S. SAMARTINO, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1965-04-23
Citations: 174 So. 2d 451
Docket Number: No. 5132
Parties: Lula M. FAISON, Appellant, v. William S. SAMARTINO, Appellee.
Judges: SMITH, C. J., ALLEN, J., and WIG-GINTON, JOHN T., Associate Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 174
Pages: 451–451

Head Matter:
Lula M. FAISON, Appellant, v. William S. SAMARTINO, Appellee.
No. 5132.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.
April 23, 1965.
T. C. Houk, Stuart, and Farish & Parish, West Palm Beach, for appellant
Jones, Adams, Paine & Foster, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record having been fully considered and appellant having failed to show reversal error, the judgment appealed is accordingly affirmed. Cf. Gulle v. Boggs, Supreme Court of Florida, 174 So.2d 26. Opinion filed April 7, 1965.
Affirmed.
SMITH, C. J., ALLEN, J., and WIG-GINTON, JOHN T., Associate Judge, concur.