Case Name: The State ex rel. Heinbaugh, Appellee, v. Conrad, Admr., et al.; RMI Titanium Company, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1999-01-20
Citations: 84 Ohio St. 3d 360
Docket Number: No. 98-1067
Parties: The State ex rel. Heinbaugh, Appellee, v. Conrad, Admr., et al.; RMI Titanium Company, Appellant.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 84
Pages: 360–360

Head Matter:
The State ex rel. Heinbaugh, Appellee, v. Conrad, Admr., et al.; RMI Titanium Company, Appellant.
[Cite as State ex rel. Heinbaugh v. Conrad (1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 360.]
(No. 98-1067
Submitted November 10, 1998
Decided January 20, 1999.)
Urban Co., L.P.A., and Anthony P. Christine, for appellee.
Jane P. Wilson & Associates Co., L.P.A., Jane P. Wilson and Graig E. Kluge, for appellant.

Opinion:
. The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Pfeifer, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.