Case Name: Lemlem Siemegn MITIKE, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-02-16
Citations: 122 F. App'x 40
Docket Number: No. 04-1943
Parties: Lemlem Siemegn MITIKE, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 122
Pages: 40–40

Head Matter:
Lemlem Siemegn MITIKE, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 04-1943.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 26, 2005.
Decided: Feb. 16, 2005.
Oti W. Nwosu, Arthur D. Wright, III, the Wright Law Network, Riverdale, Maryland, for Petitioner.
Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, James A. Hunolt, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Lemlem Siemegn Mitike, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("Board") denying her motion to reconsider its denial of her motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have reviewed the administrative record and the Board's order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion. See INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24, 112 S.Ct. 719, 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED