Case Name: GALLISON et al., Respondents, v. WRIGHT & COBB LIGHTERAGE CO., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1905-03-03
Citations: 92 N.Y.S. 1125
Docket Number: 
Parties: GALLISON et al., Respondents, v. WRIGHT & COBB LIGHTERAGE CO., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 92
Pages: 1125–1125

Head Matter:
GALLISON et al., Respondents, v. WRIGHT & COBB LIGHTERAGE CO., Appellants.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
March 3, 1905.)
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, First District. Action by Forrest W. Gallison and another, individually and as surviving partners of F. W. Jarvis & Co., against the Wright & Cobb Lighterage _ Company. From a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, after a trial before the court without a jury, the defendant appeals. Reversed. Albert A. Wray (Walter W. Hay of counsel), for appellants. Alfred T. Davison, for respondents.

Opinion:
SCOTT, J.
There is absolutely no competent evidence in the case showing that there was any shortage. The judgment should be reversed, and a new trial granted, with costs to appellants to abide the event.