Case Name: Sharon SINTON, Appellant, v. Mark Jay SINTON, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1999-12-29
Citations: 749 So. 2d 532
Docket Number: No. 99-00758
Parties: Sharon SINTON, Appellant, v. Mark Jay SINTON, Appellee.
Judges: PATTERSON, C.J., ALTENBERND and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 749
Pages: 532–533

Head Matter:
Sharon SINTON, Appellant, v. Mark Jay SINTON, Appellee.
No. 99-00758.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Dec. 29, 1999.
Carl T. Boake of Wallace, Finck, Boake & Colclough, P.A., St. Petersburg; and Kevin E. Farris of Kevin E. Farris, P.A., St. Petersburg, for Appellant.
Joan LoBianco Walker of Joan LoBian-co Walker, P.A., St. Petersburg, for Appel-lee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Sharon Sinton, challenges an order modifying the visitation provisions of her final judgment of dissolution. Appellant contends she was not given notice that the issue of visitation would be addressed at the hearing on the former husband's petition to modify the final judgment. Because the court's pretrial conference order did not list visitation as an issue in dispute, and because both parties filed pretrial statements indicating that the matter of visitation had been settled at mediation, we agree, and reverse. See Fla. Fam. L.R.P. 12.200(d); Lentz v. Lentz, 414 So.2d 292 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982).
PATTERSON, C.J., ALTENBERND and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.