Case Name: Leonard STEELMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2001-10-26
Citations: 801 So. 2d 960
Docket Number: No. 2D01-2304
Parties: Leonard STEELMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: BLUE, C.J., and DAVIS, J., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 801
Pages: 960–961

Head Matter:
Leonard STEELMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D01-2304.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Oct. 26, 2001.
Rehearing Denied Nov. 27, 2001.

Opinion:
SALCINES, Judge.
Leonard Steelman timely appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). His only claim is that he was sentenced in violation of Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993). This claim is facially insufficient as a rule 3.800(a) motion because he failed to assert that the determination of whether the offenses were part of the same criminal episode could be made without resort to extra-record facts. See Young v. State, 787 So.2d 259, 260 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). We, therefore, affirm without prejudice to any right Mr. Steelman might have to file a facially sufficient claim under rule 3.800(a).
Affirmed.
BLUE, C.J., and DAVIS, J., Concur.