Case Name: Emmitt and Shields against James Young and others
Court: General Court of Maryland
Jurisdiction: Maryland
Decision Date: 1793-05
Citations: 3 Md. 122
Docket Number: 
Parties: Emmitt and Shields against James Young and others.
Judges: 
Reporter: Maryland reports, being a series of the most important law cases argued and determined in the Provincial Court and Court of Appeals of the then province of Maryland, from the year 1700 [i.e. 1658] down to the [end of 1799]
Volume: 3
Pages: 122–123

Head Matter:
GENERAL COURT,
MAY TERM, 1793.
Emmitt and Shields against James Young and others.
MOTION for a procedendo to be awarded to the court below on a certiorari, which removed to this court the record and proceedings on a commission- issued by Frederick county court, under the act of assembly to mark and bound lands, and returned to the said court.
B. Johnson and Mason, for the plaintiff.
Shaajf and J. Dorsey, for the defendants,.

Opinion:
The Court
(all the judges present) were unanimously of opinion that a certiorari would not lie, and ordered a procedendo thereon to the county court.