Case Name: In re Antoine HILL, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-04-09
Citations: 518 F. App'x 151
Docket Number: No. 13-1207
Parties: In re Antoine HILL, Petitioner.
Judges: Before MOTZ and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 518
Pages: 151–151

Head Matter:
In re Antoine HILL, Petitioner.
No. 13-1207.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 2, 2013.
Decided: April 9, 2013.
Antoine Hill, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before MOTZ and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Antoine Hill petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.