Case Name: Julius Bram, Respondent, v. International Mutoscope Reel Co., Inc., and Another, Defendants. Louis Rabkin, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1925-11
Citations: 215 A.D. 719
Docket Number: 
Parties: Julius Bram, Respondent, v. International Mutoscope Reel Co., Inc., and Another, Defendants. Louis Rabkin, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 215
Pages: 719–719

Head Matter:
Julius Bram, Respondent, v. International Mutoscope Reel Co., Inc., and Another, Defendants. Louis Rabkin, Appellant.

Opinion:
Appeal from order denying appellant's application to modify injunction order dismissed, without costs. The appellant is not a party to the action, and before he can be heard to assert his title to the property in question he should make application to be made a party, pursuant to the provisions of subdivision 3 of section 193 of the Civil Practice Act. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jayeox, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.