Case Name: James Lamont JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. P.T. SHARP, Magistrate Judge; Paul A. Weinman, Assistant United States Attorney, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-04-20
Citations: 95 F. App'x 494
Docket Number: No. 03-7864
Parties: James Lamont JOHNSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. P.T. SHARP, Magistrate Judge; Paul A. Weinman, Assistant United States Attorney, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 95
Pages: 494–494

Head Matter:
James Lamont JOHNSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. P.T. SHARP, Magistrate Judge; Paul A. Weinman, Assistant United States Attorney, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 03-7864.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 15, 2004.
Decided April 20, 2004.
James Lamont Johnson, Appellant pro se.
Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
James Lamont Johnson appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Johnson v. Sharp, No. CA-03-810-1 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 3, 2003). We deny Johnson's motions for an injunction, for a restraining order, and to stay the case. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED