Case Name: SMITH v. WASHINGTON
Court: United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1856-05-23
Citations: 22 F. Cas. 698
Docket Number: 
Parties: SMITH v. WASHINGTON.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Cases
Volume: 22
Pages: 698–698

Head Matter:
Case No. 13,123b.
SMITH v. WASHINGTON.
[2 Hayw. & H. 220.]
Circuit Court, District of Columbia.
May 23, 1856.
Municipal Corporations — Grading Streets — Compensation por Injuries Resulting.
The corporation of the city of Washington has power to regrade the streets of the city under its charter, without making compensation for individual Injuries, unless in exercising the power given it acted corruptly or with a design to injure; the power is a continuing, power, to be exercised whenever deemed proper.
[This judgment was affirmed by the supreme court, where it was carried on writ of error. 20 How. (61 U. S.) 135.]
At law. This action was brought by the plaintiff [Ann C. Cushing, for the use of Caleb Cushing] for injury sustained by the grading of K street in front of her premises in Franklin Row, in doing which they cut down that street some five or six feet, injuring, as she alleged, the value and use of her house. From the evidence it appeared that the street had been graded under the direction of the corporation in 1830, and had remained at that grade until the summer of 1851, when the street was cut down by direction of the defendants some two feet, and then gravelled and left, and in the fall of the. same year they caused it to be again graded by cutting it down about three feet more. The grading destroyed the shade trees in front of plaintiff’s premises, and rendered a stonewall in front and other improvements necessary for the convenient use of her house. No compensation was made by the city for the injury sustained. The plaintiff sought to recover the expenses incurred and damages sustained by these gradings in 1851. The defendants insisted that the general public good required the alterations made in the grade. The case finally turned upon a question of law. The defendants contended that they had, under the act of congress, the right to regrade whenever, in their judgment, it was necessary and proper, and that they were not responsible in damages unless the plaintiff showed that they acted corruptly, or with the malicious design of injuring the plaintiff. On the other side it was insisted that when the corporation had established the grade of a street, they had no power so to change it as to injure private property' without making compensation to the owner, as had been done in three cases out of seven in the grading in front of Franklin Row. •
R. H. Gillette, for plaintiff.
J. H. Bradley, for defendant.
[Affirmed in 20 How. (61 U. S.) 135.]

Opinion:
THE COURT
instructed the jury that the corporation had the power to regrade the streets of the city of Washington, under their charter, without making the compensation for individual injuries, unless the plaintiff showed that they had acted corruptly or with the design to injure; and that the jury must presume that they acted legally until one of these things was proved. They held that the power to grade was a continuing power, to be exercised whenever they deemed it proper to do so.
The jury under these instructions rendered a verdict in favor of the defendants.