Case Name: Roger F. CARLSON; Mary Jo Carlson, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DEL WEBB COMMUNITIES, INC.; Pulte Homes, Inc., Defendants-Appellees, and South Carolina State Plastering, LLC; Peter Conley, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-05-20
Citations: 649 F. App'x 309
Docket Number: No. 15-2349
Parties: Roger F. CARLSON; Mary Jo Carlson, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DEL WEBB COMMUNITIES, INC.; Pulte Homes, Inc., Defendants-Appellees, and South Carolina State Plastering, LLC; Peter Conley, Defendants.
Judges: Before TRAXLER,. Chief Judge, and GREGORY and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 649
Pages: 309–310

Head Matter:
Roger F. CARLSON; Mary Jo Carlson, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DEL WEBB COMMUNITIES, INC.; Pulte Homes, Inc., Defendants-Appellees, and South Carolina State Plastering, LLC; Peter Conley, Defendants.
No. 15-2349.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 23, 2016.
Decided: May 20, 2016.
William Jefferson Leath, Jr., Michael S. Seekings, Leath, Bouch & Seekings, LLP, Charleston, South Carolina; Phillip W. Se-guí, Jr., Amanda Morgan Blundy, Segui Law Firm, PC, Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, for Appellants. Robert L. Widener, McNair Law Firm, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina; A. Victor Rawl, Jr., Henry W. Frampton, rV, McNair Law Firm, P.A., Charleston, South Carolina, for Ap-pellees.
Before TRAXLER,. Chief Judge, and GREGORY and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Roger F. Carlson and Mary Jo Carlson appeal the district court's order denying their motion under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) (2012) seeking attorney's fees. We have reviewed the' district court's decision for abuse of discretion and find none. See In re Lowe, 102 F.3d 731, 733 n. 2 (4th Cir.1996) (noting that district court has discretion to award fees on remand). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Carlson v. Del Webb Communities, Inc., No. 9:15-cv-00292-SB (D.S.C. Oct. 26, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.