Case Name: Kenneth W. CONLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-05-10
Citations: 681 So. 2d 724
Docket Number: No. 95-00421
Parties: Kenneth W. CONLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: DANAHY, A.C.J., and LAZZARA and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 681
Pages: 724–724

Head Matter:
Kenneth W. CONLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 95-00421.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
May 10, 1996.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Megan Olson, Assistant Public Defender, Clearwater, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Dale E. Tarpley, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
On this appeal filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), the appellant, Kenneth W. Conley, challenges his judgments and sentences for trespass of an occupied structure, aggravated battery with a firearm, and being a felon in possession of a firearm. Though he raises several issues, we find merit only in his contention that certain costs and probationary conditions were improperly imposed. We therefore strike those costs and conditions.
Specifically, we strike the $45 assessment for the costs of prosecution because such costs were neither requested nor orally pronounced at sentencing. See Brown v. State, 658 So.2d 1058 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). We also strike all of probation condition nine and that portion of probation condition 13 which requires Conley to pay for drug and alcohol testing, evaluation, and treatment, because those were special conditions which were not orally pronounced at sentencing. See Hamilton v. State, 653 So.2d 1068 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).
Accordingly, the foregoing costs and conditions are stricken. Conley's judgments and sentences are otherwise affirmed.
DANAHY, A.C.J., and LAZZARA and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.