Case Name: Joel CHAVEZ-SESTEAGA, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-02-24
Citations: 170 F. App'x 452
Docket Number: No. 05-72373
Parties: Joel CHAVEZ-SESTEAGA, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, GOODWIN and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 170
Pages: 452–452

Head Matter:
Joel CHAVEZ-SESTEAGA, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 05-72373.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 21, 2006.
Filed Feb. 24, 2006.
Joseph M. Bacho, Esq., Law Offices of Joseph M. Bacho, Yuma, AZ, for Petitioner.
District Director, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Diego, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Alison R. Drucker, Esq., DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit. Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, GOODWIN and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
This is a petition for review of the denial of petitioner's application for adjustment of status. Upon review of the record and petitioner's opening brief, we conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, respondent's motion for summary disposition is granted.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.