Case Name: Cornell Curry, Appellant, v. New York City Transit Authority, Sued Herein as New York City Metropolitan Transit Authority and its Police Department, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2006-06-22
Citations: 30 A.D.3d 299
Docket Number: 
Parties: Cornell Curry, Appellant, v New York City Transit Authority, Sued Herein as New York City Metropolitan Transit Authority and its Police Department, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 30
Pages: 299–299

Head Matter:
Cornell Curry, Appellant, v New York City Transit Authority, Sued Herein as New York City Metropolitan Transit Authority and its Police Department, Respondent.
[818 NYS2d 39]

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert D. Lippmann, J.), entered January 24, 2006, which denied plaintiffs motion for a default judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The Supreme Court properly denied plaintiffs motion for a default judgment because, inter alia, plaintiff did not show that defendant's relatively short delay in serving its answer prejudiced him. Moreover, the delay was, at least in part, attributable to the fact that the named defendant is nonexistent, thus creating uncertainty about the identity of the actual entity intended to be sued (CPLR 3012 [d]; see DeMarco v Wyndham Intl., 299 AD2d 209 [2002]; Higgins v Bellet Constr. Co., 287 AD2d 377 [2001]). Concur—Saxe, J.P., Marlow, Nardelli, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.