Case Name: Charles Brambir and Another, Appellants, v. Harry Seifert, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1926-06-26
Citations: 127 Misc. 603
Docket Number: 
Parties: Charles Brambir and Another, Appellants, v. Harry Seifert, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 127
Pages: 603–603

Head Matter:
Charles Brambir and Another, Appellants, v. Harry Seifert, Respondent.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
June 26, 1926.
Kotzen Brothers [Milton M. Siegel of counsel], for the appellants.
Max Schmer, for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We cannot assume that the 1924 amendment of section 1425 of the Civil Practice Act (added by Laws of 1921, chap. 199, as amd. by Laws of 1924, chap. 514), providing for judgment for rent, was intended, contrary to well-established principles, to warrant the entry of judgment for rent against a tenant not personally served with the precept or who had not appeared in the proceeding. .
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs.
All concur; present, Bijur, O'Malley and Levy, JJ.