Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. WALTER HIGGINBOTHAM, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1982-04-19
Citations: 56 Or. App. 861
Docket Number: Nos. J80-2345 and J81-1596, CA A22007, A22008
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. WALTER HIGGINBOTHAM, Appellant.
Judges: Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Richardson and Warden, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 56
Pages: 861–862

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted January 22,
sentences vacated and causes remanded for resentencing April 19, 1982
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. WALTER HIGGINBOTHAM, Appellant.
(Nos. J80-2345 and J81-1596, CA A22007, A22008)
(Cases Consolidated.)
643 P2d 878
John Daugirda, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.
William F. Gary, Solicitor General, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, Salem.
Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Richardson and Warden, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
In this consolidated appeal of two criminal convictions, the state concedes error in that the trial court gave no reason for the sentences which it imposed and failed to give any reason for making the sentences consecutive. See ORS 137.120(2); State v. Biles, 287 Or 63, 597 P2d 808 (1979). No other error is assigned.
Sentences vacated and causes remanded for resentencing.