Case Name: Kenneth Dwayne LOCKLEAR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patricia R. STANSBERRY, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-04-21
Citations: 126 F. App'x 153
Docket Number: No. 05-6177
Parties: Kenneth Dwayne LOCKLEAR, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Patricia R. STANSBERRY, Warden, Respondent—Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 126
Pages: 153–153

Head Matter:
Kenneth Dwayne LOCKLEAR, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Patricia R. STANSBERRY, Warden, Respondent—Appellee.
No. 05-6177.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 14, 2005.
Decided: April 21, 2005.
Kenneth Dwayne Locklear, Appellant pro se.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Kenneth Dwayne Locklear, a federal prisoner, appeals from the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition, which challenged the Bureau of Prison's computation of good time credits, for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Locklear v. Stansberry, No. CA-04-856 (E.D.N.C. filed Dec. 14, 2004; entered Dec. 27, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED