Case Name: David R. CORBIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Social Security Commissioner; Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General; Gail Willis, Ms., Social Security Administration; Scott Ussery, Mr., Attorney of Law; June Koening, Ms., Bladen County Child Support, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-04-29
Citations: 324 F. App'x 260
Docket Number: No. 08-2353
Parties: David R. CORBIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Social Security Commissioner; Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General; Gail Willis, Ms., Social Security Administration; Scott Ussery, Mr., Attorney of Law; June Koening, Ms., Bladen County Child Support, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 324
Pages: 260–261

Head Matter:
David R. CORBIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Social Security Commissioner; Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General; Gail Willis, Ms., Social Security Administration; Scott Ussery, Mr., Attorney of Law; June Koening, Ms., Bladen County Child Support, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 08-2353.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 23, 2009.
Decided: April 29, 2009.
David R. Corbin, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d) (2006).

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
David R. Corbin appeals the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation and dismissing as frivolous Corbin's civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Cor-bin's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss for the reasons stated by the district court. Corbin v. Astrue, No. 5:08-cv-00096-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 12, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.