Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hilda NAVARRETE-LANDA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-09-19
Citations: 46 F. App'x 538
Docket Number: No. 01-50516; D.C. No. CR-01-01371-BTM
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Hilda NAVARRETE-LANDA, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 46
Pages: 538–539

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Hilda NAVARRETE-LANDA, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 01-50516.
D.C. No. CR-01-01371-BTM.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 9, 2002.
Decided Sept. 19, 2002.
Before HUG, O’SCANNLAIN and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Hilda Navarrete-Landa appeals her guilty plea conviction and sentence for importing marijuana through the Calexico Port of Entry. Her argument challenging the constitutionality of 21 U.S.C. § 952 and 960 is foreclosed by United States v. Varela-Rivera, 279 F.3d 1174, 1175 n. 1 (9th Cir.2002) and United States v. Mendoza-Paz, 286 F.3d 1104 (9th Cir.2002). This court has also rejected her claim that the government was required to prove that she knew the quantity and type of the drugs involved in the offense. United States v. Carranza, 289 F.3d 634, 644 (9th Cir.2002).
Accordingly, the judgment and sentence are
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.