Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ernest Lee McCARTY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-07-17
Citations: 610 F. App'x 405
Docket Number: Nos. 13-51040, 13-51136
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ernest Lee McCARTY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 610
Pages: 405–406

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ernest Lee McCARTY, Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 13-51040, 13-51136
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth .Circuit.
July 17, 2015.
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellée.
John Anthony Peralta, Esq., Liberty, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Ernest Lee McCarty, Three Rivers, TX, pro se.
Before KING, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Ernest Lee McCarty has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). McCarty has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as McCarty's response. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeals present no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motions for leave to withdraw are GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEALS ARE DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.