Case Name: In re David B. CAULKETT, Debtor. Bank of America, N.A., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David B. Caulkett, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-05-21
Citations: 566 F. App'x 879
Docket Number: No. 14-10803
Parties: In re David B. CAULKETT, Debtor. Bank of America, N.A., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David B. Caulkett, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before MARCUS, PRYOR, and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Bankruptcy Reporter
Volume: 514
Pages: 879–880

Head Matter:
In re David B. CAULKETT, Debtor. Bank of America, N.A., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David B. Caulkett, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 14-10803
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
May 21, 2014.
James Randolph Liebler, Laudy Luna Perez, Liebler Gonzalez & Portuondo, PA, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
David Joseph Volk, Volk Law Offices, PA, Melbourne, FL, for Defendant-Appel-lee.
Before MARCUS, PRYOR, and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Bank of America, N.A. appeals the district court's affirmance of the bankruptcy court's order voiding a wholly unsecured second priority lien on residential property owned by a Chapter 7 debtor. The issue on appeal is whether a Chapter 7 debtor is allowed to "strip off' a second priority lien on his home, pursuant to 11 U.S .C. § 506(a) and (d), when the first priority lien exceeds the value of the property.
We addressed recently this issue and concluded that a wholly unsecured junior lien — such as the one held here by Bank of America — is voidable under section 506(d). See McNeal v. GMAC Mortg., LLC (In re McNeal), 735 F.3d 1263 (11th Cir.2012) (citing Folendore v. United States Small Bus. Admin., 862 F.2d 1537 (11th Cir. 1989)). Bank of America acknowledges that this panel is bound by the Court's decisions in McNeal and Folendore, but reserves the right to seek reconsideration of the issue by the en banc Court. Cf. United States v. Smith, 122 F.3d 1355, 1359 (1 1th Cir.1997) ("Under the prior panel precedent rule, we are bound by earlier panel holdings . unless and until they are overruled en banc or by the Supreme Court.").
AFFIRMED.