Case Name: Disciplinary Counsel v. Phillabaum
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2016-11-14
Citations: 147 Ohio St. 3d 1297
Docket Number: No. 2015-0279
Parties: Disciplinary Counsel v. Phillabaum.
Judges: O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 147
Pages: 1297–1297

Head Matter:
Disciplinary Counsel v. Phillabaum.
(No. 2015-0279
Submitted November 9, 2016
Decided November 14, 2016.)

Opinion:
{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Jason Richard Phillabaum, Attorney Registration No. 0072219, last known business address in Cincinnati, Ohio.
{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of October 27, 2015, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24).
{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.
{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2).
{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Phillabaum, 144 Ohio St.3d 417, 2015-Ohio-4346, 44 N.E.3d 271.
O'Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O'Neill, JJ., concur.