Case Name: Todd ALEXANDER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2017-02-15
Citations: 211 So. 3d 1085
Docket Number: Nos. 3D15-2314; 3D15-2140
Parties: Todd ALEXANDER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SUAREZ, C.J. and LAGOA and SCALES, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 211
Pages: 1085–1086

Head Matter:
Todd ALEXANDER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Nos. 3D15-2314
3D15-2140
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Opinion filed February 15, 2017.
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Harvey J. Sepler and Jeffrey Paul DeSousa, Assistant Public Defenders, for appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Arlisa Certain, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SUAREZ, C.J. and LAGOA and SCALES, JJ.

Opinion:
SCALES, J.
In this consolidated appeal, Appellant Todd Alexander challenges both (i) his conviction for animal cruelty, and (ii) the trial court's revocation of his probation based on the animal cruelty conviction. Because the jury's verdict is supported by competent, substantial evidence of when Alexander committed the crime, we affirm. Gonzalez v. State, 841 So.2d 650, 652 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (jury verdict supported by competent, substantial evidence must be sustained on appeal). We remand only to allow the trial court to enter a correct written order, consistent with its oral pro nouncement, to reflect that the crime was not committed using a weapon.
Affirmed; remanded.