Case Name: WALTERS AND WALKER vs. JOHN A. BREEDER
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 1855-12
Citations: 3 Jones 64
Docket Number: 
Parties: WALTERS AND WALKER vs. JOHN A. BREEDER.
Judges: 
Reporter: North Carolina Reports
Volume: 48
Pages: 64–64

Head Matter:
WALTERS AND WALKER vs. JOHN A. BREEDER.
Citizens of other States may sue one another in the courts of this State, on personal causes of action.
Action of assumpsit, tried before his Honor, Judge Ellis, at the Pali Term, 1855, of Columbus Superior Court.
The defendant pleaded in abatement to the jurisdiction of the court, that the plaintiffs were citizens of the district of Charleston, in the State of South Carolina, at the time of the issuing of this writ, and that he, defendant, was a citizen of the district of Marion, in the same State, and that neither of them did, at the time, or before, or since, reside in the county of Columbus in this State, when this suit was brought.
To this plea the plaintiffs demurred.
On argument of the case below, his Honor sustained the plea in abatement, and gave judgment for defendant, from which judgment plaintiffs appealed.
Shepherd, for plaintiffs.
MeDugald and Troy, for defendant.

Opinion:
Pearson, J.
We think it settled, that a citizen of South Carolina may sue another citizen of that State, in the courts of our State, upon a personal cause of action originating in South' Carolina. Miller v. Black, 2 Jones' Rep. 341.
The distinction suggested in the argument that, in this case, both the parties are residents of the same State, can make no difference.
There is error. The plaintiff was entitled to a judgment of respondeat ouster.
Per Curiam.
Judgment reversed.