Case Name: J. Walter Thompson Advertising Corporation and Earle Clark, Respondents, v. Melvin J. Woodworth, Appellant, Impleaded with Another, Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1938-05-13
Citations: 254 A.D. 721
Docket Number: 
Parties: J. Walter Thompson Advertising Corporation and Earle Clark, Respondents, v. Melvin J. Woodworth, Appellant, Impleaded with Another, Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 254
Pages: 721–721

Head Matter:
J. Walter Thompson Advertising Corporation and Earle Clark, Respondents, v. Melvin J. Woodworth, Appellant, Impleaded with Another, Defendant.

Opinion:
— Whether or not the sufficiency of the counterclaim may be raised on motion for a trial by jury of the issues raised by the reply thereto (Civ. Prac. Act, § 424, 425), we are of opinion that the motion should have been granted as the counterclaim states a good cause of action at law. Order unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted. Present — Martin, P. J., O'Malley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.