Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Rashitbek Adikov, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2016-03-29
Citations: 137 A.D.3d 672
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rashitbek Adikov, Appellant.
Judges: Concur—Friedman, J.P., Andrias, Saxe and Richter, JJ.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 137
Pages: 672–672

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rashitbek Adikov, Appellant.
[28 NYS3d 64]

Opinion:
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel P. FitzGerald, J.), rendered February 8, 2013, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of two to six years, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly denied defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Based on an objective reading of the plea bargain (see People v Collier, 22 NY3d 429, 433-434 [2013]), we conclude that defendant's plea was not induced by an unfulfilled promise. Defendant was clearly apprised that the promise was a sentence of 2 to 6 years, and not time served. While the court informed defendant that his sentence would "in effect" be time served because he had already served the two-year minimum, and because prompt parole for the purpose of deportation to defendant's native country was very likely, this was expressed in terms of probability, not certainty. The court also made no firm promise about whether defendant would be in City or State custody before being paroled. In any event, to the extent the promise could be objectively understood to be a promise of a sentence that was nearly or approximately a sentence of time served, that promise was essentially fulfilled.
Concur—Friedman, J.P., Andrias, Saxe and Richter, JJ.