Case Name: Donna COLEMAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gwendolyn MITCHELL, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-07-21
Citations: 338 F. App'x 672
Docket Number: No. 07-15888
Parties: Donna COLEMAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gwendolyn MITCHELL, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 338
Pages: 672–673

Head Matter:
Donna COLEMAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gwendolyn MITCHELL, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 07-15888.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 14, 2009.
Filed July 21, 2009.
Donna Coleman, Chowchilla, CA, pro se.
Brian George Smiley, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.
Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
California state prisoner Donna Coleman appeals from the district court's judgment denying her 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.
Coleman contends that her right to due process was violated when her legs were shackled in front of the jury. Because Coleman procedurally defaulted the claim in her federal habeas petition, we do not reach the merits of her claim. See Coleman v. Thompson, 501 U.S. 722, 729, 111 S.Ct. 2546, 115 L.Ed.2d 640 (1991); see also Estelle v. McGuire, 502 U.S. 62, 67-68, 112 S.Ct. 475, 116 L.Ed.2d 385 (1991).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.