Case Name: Peter MARLOWE, Appellant, v. Thomas J. COVEY, Jr., and Lucille Covey, his wife, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-02-07
Citations: 668 So. 2d 234
Docket Number: No. 95-1898
Parties: Peter MARLOWE, Appellant, v. Thomas J. COVEY, Jr., and Lucille Covey, his wife, Appellees.
Judges: Before LEVY, GERSTEN, and GREEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 668
Pages: 234–235

Head Matter:
Peter MARLOWE, Appellant, v. Thomas J. COVEY, Jr., and Lucille Covey, his wife, Appellees.
No. 95-1898.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 7, 1996.
Rehearing Denied March 6, 1996.
Morgan & Hendrick, and James T. Hen-drick, Key West; Siegel & Lipman, and Steven M. Goldsmith, Boca Raton, for appellant.
Browning, Guller and Associates, and Charlene Guller Browning, Key West, for appellees.
Before LEVY, GERSTEN, and GREEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Haimovitz v. Robb, 130 Fla. 844, 178 So. 827 (1937) ("[H]e is not required under the law to do a vain and useless thing.").