Case Name: Application of Carl PHILIPS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. NEWELL CO., Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1997-07-30
Citations: 118 F.3d 972
Docket Number: No. 2310, Docket 97-7559
Parties: Application of Carl PHILIPS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. NEWELL CO., Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before: WINTER, Chief Judge, JACOBS and LEVAL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 118
Pages: 972–972

Head Matter:
Application of Carl PHILIPS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. NEWELL CO., Respondent-Appellee.
No. 2310, Docket 97-7559.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued July 15, 1997.
Decided July 30, 1997.
Ronald J. Offenkrantz, New York City (Michael H. Smith, of counsel), for Petitioner-Appellant.
Barry S. Alberts, New York City (Robert J. Hoskins, Paul Serudato, of counsel), for Respondent-Appellee.
Before: WINTER, Chief Judge, JACOBS and LEVAL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from Judge Leisure's denial of a petition to stay arbitration. We affirm for the reasons set forth in his opinion. Application of Carl Philips v. Newell Co., No. 96 CIV. 9153, 1997 WL 181191 (S.D.N.Y. April 15, 1997). The cont entions raised by the appellant for the first time on appeal are without merit.