Case Name: Margaret Christmas LAFARGUE and Alexander Lafargue, Appellants, v. Dr. Ernest C. SAMUEL et al., Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1966-10-24
Citations: 367 F.2d 396
Docket Number: No. 23034
Parties: Margaret Christmas LAFARGUE and Alexander Lafargue, Appellants, v. Dr. Ernest C. SAMUEL et al., Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 367
Pages: 396–396

Head Matter:
Margaret Christmas LAFARGUE and Alexander Lafargue, Appellants, v. Dr. Ernest C. SAMUEL et al., Appellees.
No. 23034.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
Oct. 24, 1966.
Rehearing Denied Nov. 28, 1966.
John D. Lambert, Jr., Harry Nowalsky, New Orleans, La., Robert B. Adam, Gulfport, Miss., and Coe, Nowalsky & Lambert, New Orleans, La., for appellants.
Rae Bryant, Gulfport, Miss., James N. Drury, Drury & Lozes, New Orleans, La., Thomas L. Stennis, II, Gulfport, Miss., for appellees.
Before JONES, COLEMAN and AINSWORTH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this appeal, where jurisdiction depends upon diversity of citizenship, the controlling principle is announced in Succession of Roux v. Guidry, decided by the Court of Appeal of Louisiana and reported in 182 So.2d 109. The rule there announced requires that the judgment of the district court be, and it is
Affirmed.