Case Name: Danny J. COHEA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Cheryl K. PLILER; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-07-24
Citations: 286 F. App'x 436
Docket Number: No. 08-15859
Parties: Danny J. COHEA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Cheryl K. PLILER; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 286
Pages: 436–436

Head Matter:
Danny J. COHEA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Cheryl K. PLILER; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 08-15859.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 14, 2008.
Filed July 24, 2008.
Danny J. Cohea, pro se.
Grant Lien, Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: SCHROEDER, LEAYY and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Upon review of the record and appellant's opening brief, this court hereby summarily affirms the district court's order denying appellant's motions for preliminary injunctive relief. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (summary affirmance appropriate where result is clear from face of record).
All pending motions are denied as moot.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.