Case Name: Jose A. ARREBOLA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-05-10
Citations: 756 So. 2d 1107
Docket Number: No. 3D99-2954
Parties: Jose A. ARREBOLA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before COPE, GREEN, and SORONDO, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 756
Pages: 1107–1107

Head Matter:
Jose A. ARREBOLA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D99-2954.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 10, 2000.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Richard L. Polin, Assistant Attorney General, and Ana D’Costa, Certified Legal Intern, for appellant.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Rosa C. Figarola, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee.
Before COPE, GREEN, and SORONDO, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
As we cannot conclude that the challenged remarks made by the state during its closing arguments in this trial were fundamentally erroneous as urged by the appellant, we affirm his conviction and sentence for burglary of an unoccupied structure. See McDonald v. State, 743 So.2d 501 (Fla.1999); Sandoval v. State, 689 So.2d 1258 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).
Affirm.