Case Name: Curtis ADAMS v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1976-09-15
Citations: 540 S.W.2d 733
Docket Number: No. 52701
Parties: Curtis ADAMS v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 540
Pages: 733–734

Head Matter:
Curtis ADAMS v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
No. 52701.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Sept. 15, 1976.
Charles M. Beacham, San Antonio, for appellant.
Ted Butler, Dist. Atty., and E. Dickinson Ryman and Susan D. Reed, Asst. Dist. At-tys., San Antonio, Jim D. Yollers, State’s Atty., and David S. McAngus, Asst. State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
OPINION
DAVIS, Commissioner.
This is an appeal from an order revoking probation wherein appellant stands convicted of the primary offense of robbery by assault in violation of Art. 1408, V.A.P.C. (1925). The punishment is imprisonment for five years.
An examination of the record reveals that the indictment for the primary offense of robbery by assault is fatally defective in that it fails to allege to whom the property allegedly taken belonged. Lucero v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 502 S.W.2d 128; Bouie v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 528 S.W.2d 587; French v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 531 S.W.2d 613; Arline v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 529 S.W.2d 73; Ainsworth v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 531 S.W.2d 613; Batro v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 531 S.W.2d 614; Page v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 532 S.W.2d 341; Pittman v. State, Tex.Cr. App., 532 S.W.2d 97.
The judgment is reversed and the prosecution is ordered dismissed.
Opinion approved by the Court.