Case Name: JOGE RAJ v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1927-03-23
Citations: 292 S.W. 545
Docket Number: No. 10787
Parties: JOGE RAJ v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 292
Pages: 545–545

Head Matter:
JOGE RAJ v. STATE.
(No. 10787.)
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
March 23, 1927.)
Harris & Hogan, of San Antonio, for appellant.
Sam D. Stinson, State’s Atty., of Austin, and Robt. M. Lyles, Asst. State’s Atty., of Groesbeck, for the State.

Opinion:
LATTIMORE, J.
Conviction for vagrancy ; punishment, fine of $200.
The - state's attorney calls our attention to the fact that the record in this case contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exception nor judgment, and moves to dismiss the appeal. In addition to the matters just enumerated, we observe that the transcript contains no proper caption. It refers to a term of the county court of Bexar county for criminal cases, begun and holden in the county of Bexar on —-day of July, 1923. When the term ended is not shown. The complaint appearing in the transcript was filed on the 7th of July, 1923, apparently in the coui-t of Ben S. Fisk, justice of the peace. The judgment adjudging appellant guilty appears to have rendered by the same official. If there was ever any proceedings had in this cause in the county court of Bexar county for criminal cases, there is nothing in the transcript to indicate. it. There - seems to have been no papers filed in said county court,- or any trial there, or any judgment rendered, nor anything else which would give this court any jurisdiction to hear this apr peal.
This court appears to be without jurisdiction, and the appeal is dismissed.