Case Name: CREWS v. WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1963-10-21
Citations: 375 U.S. 50
Docket Number: No. 59
Parties: CREWS v. WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR.
Judges: Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Clark dissent for the reason that the judgment rests on an adequate state ground.
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 375
Pages: 50–50

Head Matter:
CREWS v. WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR.
No. 59,
Misc.
Decided October 21, 1963.
Petitioner pro se.
Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and James O. Mahorner, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Florida for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U. S. 335.
Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Clark dissent for the reason that the judgment rests on an adequate state ground.