Case Name: The United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. City of Toledo et al.; The Standard Surety & Casualty Co. v. City of Toledo et al.; The Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co. v. City of Toledo et al.; The Guardian Casualty Co. v. City of Toledo et al.; The National Surety Co. v. City of Toledo et al.
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1933-10-04
Citations: 127 Ohio St. 403
Docket Number: Nos. 24257, 24258, 24259, 24260 and 24261
Parties: The United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. City of Toledo et al. The Standard Surety & Casualty Co. v. City of Toledo et al. The Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co. v. City of Toledo et al. The Guardian Casualty Co. v. City of Toledo et al. The National Surety Co. v. City of Toledo et al.
Judges: Weygandt, C. J., Aleen, Stephenson, Bevis, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, New Service
Volume: 127
Pages: 403–404

Head Matter:
The United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. City of Toledo et al. The Standard Surety & Casualty Co. v. City of Toledo et al. The Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co. v. City of Toledo et al. The Guardian Casualty Co. v. City of Toledo et al. The National Surety Co. v. City of Toledo et al.
(Nos. 24257, 24258, 24259, 24260 and 24261
Decided October 4, 1933.)
Messrs. Marshall, Melhorn, Marlar & Martin and Mr. Leland L. Lord, for the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, the Standard Surety & Casualty Company and the National Surety Company.
. Messrs. Denman, Miller $ Beatty, for the Detroit Fidelity & Surety Company.
Messrs. Fraser, Hiett, Wall & Effler and Mr. Howard Jacobson, for the Guardian Casualty Company.
Mr. J. I. O’Connor, director of law, and Mr. 8am Z. Kaplan, for the City of Toledo.
Messrs. Tracy, Chapman & Welles, for the Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland.
Messrs. Taber, Chittenden & Daniells and MrCharles 8. Druggan, for Aetna Casualty & Surety Company.
Messrs. Brown & Sanger and Mr. Sholto M. Douglas, for the Security Home Trust Company and Ira J. Fulton, Supt. of Banks,

Opinion:
It is ordered and adjudged that said petitions in error be, and the same hereby are, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said causes.
Petitions in error dismissed. .
Weygandt, C. J., Aleen, Stephenson, Bevis, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.