Case Name: Richard C. FOY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION; Elizabeth H. Whitsel; Ken Lewis; Camey P. McMaster, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-06-06
Citations: 229 F. App'x 242
Docket Number: No. 06-1324
Parties: Richard C. FOY, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION; Elizabeth H. Whitsel; Ken Lewis; Camey P. McMaster, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 229
Pages: 242–242

Head Matter:
Richard C. FOY, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION; Elizabeth H. Whitsel; Ken Lewis; Camey P. McMaster, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 06-1324.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 4, 2007.
Decided: June 6, 2007.
Richard C. Foy, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Pyle Dion, McGuirewoods, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Richard C. Foy appeals the district court's orders granting the individual defendants' motions to dismiss his Title VII, malicious discharge, and defamation claims, denying Foy's motion for summary judgment, and granting summary judgment to Defendants Whitsel and Bank of America Corporation on Foy's claims of hostile work environment, sex discrimination, retaliation, malicious discharge, and defamation. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Foy v. Bank of America Corp., No. 5:04-cv-00944-FL (E.D.N.C. June 15, 2005; Feb. 21, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.