Case Name: RIGGS et al. v. WILLIS et al.
Court: Texas Courts of Civil Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1931-01-24
Citations: 36 S.W.2d 263
Docket Number: No. 12524
Parties: RIGGS et al. v. WILLIS et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 36
Pages: 263–266

Head Matter:
RIGGS et al. v. WILLIS et al.
No. 12524.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Fort Worth.
Jan. 24, 1931.
Rehearing Denied March 14, 1931.
Marshall & King, of Graham, and Bulling-ton, Boone, Humphrey & King, of Wichita Falls, for appellants.
Kilgore & Rogers, of Wichita Falls, and Fred T. Arnold, of Graham, for appellees.

Opinion:
CONNER, C. J.
We have carefully considered the evidence in the record and feel unable to say that the trial court's findings of fact are not súf-ficiently supported; and those findings and the court's conclusions of law are so full and clear that it becomes unnecessary to undertake to add thereto. Accordingly, the trial court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are adopted, and the judgment is affirmed.