Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Tyreek Williams, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2014-11-14
Citations: 122 A.D.3d 1316
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tyreek Williams, Appellant.
Judges: Present — Centra, J.E, Fahey, Sconiers, Whalen and DeJoseph, JJ.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 122
Pages: 1316–1316

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tyreek Williams, Appellant.
[995 NYS2d 434]

Opinion:
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Russell E Buscaglia, A.J.), rendered July 2, 2012. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of manslaughter in the first degree.
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of manslaughter in the first degree (Penal Law § 125.20), defendant contends that the waiver of the right to appeal is not valid and challenges the severity of the sentence. Although the record establishes that defendant knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived the right to appeal (see generally People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]), we conclude that the valid waiver of the right to appeal does not encompass the challenge to the severity of the sentence inasmuch as Supreme Court failed to advise defendant of the potential periods of incarceration or the potential maximum term of incarceration (see People v Newman, 21 AD3d 1343, 1343 [2005]; People v McLean, 302 AD2d 934, 934 [2003]; cf. People v Lococo, 92 NY2d 825, 827 [1998]; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]). We nevertheless conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.
Present — Centra, J.E, Fahey, Sconiers, Whalen and DeJoseph, JJ.