Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Barry Kellam, Also Known as Barry Kellum, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1994-11-14
Citations: 209 A.D.2d 544
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Barry Kellam, Also Known as Barry Kellum, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 209
Pages: 544–545

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Barry Kellam, Also Known as Barry Kellum, Appellant.
[619 NYS2d 617]

Opinion:
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (DeLury, J.), rendered July 15, 1991, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered. No questions of fact have been raised or considered.
Over the defendant's objection, the court granted the People's application to close the courtroom during the testimony of an undercover police officer. We find that the court erred since the officer's testimony at the hearing was insufficient to meet the standards for closure (see, People v Martinez, 82 NY2d 436). Consequently, the defendant was denied his right to a public trial and a new trial is required (see, People v Martinez, supra; People v Huggins, 204 AD2d 484).
In view of our decision that there must be a new trial, we do not reach the defendant's remaining contention. Balletta, J. P., Pizzuto, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.