Case Name: William THORNE and Ruth Thorne, Appellants, v. WALKER-THOMAS FURNITURE COMPANY, Appellee
Court: District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Decision Date: 1964-03-30
Citations: 198 A.2d 914
Docket Number: No. 3412
Parties: William THORNE and Ruth Thorne, Appellants, v. WALKER-THOMAS FURNITURE COMPANY, Appellee.
Judges: Before HOOD, Chief Judge, and QUINN and MYERS, Associate Judges.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 198
Pages: 914–914

Head Matter:
William THORNE and Ruth Thorne, Appellants, v. WALKER-THOMAS FURNITURE COMPANY, Appellee.
No. 3412.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Argued Feb. 17, 1964.
Decided March 30, 1964.
Pierre E. Dostert, Washington, D. C., with whom Samuel C. Borzilleri, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellants.
Harry Protas, Washington, D. C., for ap-pellee.
Before HOOD, Chief Judge, and QUINN and MYERS, Associate Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This case presents a similar factual pattern to Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Company, D.CApp., 198 A.2d 914. Over a four-year period, appellee sold appellants merchandise valued at $1,855. After paying $1,422 of this amount appellants defaulted in their payments. Appellee then asserted its right under the contracts to replevy all the items purchased.
Appellants' arguments for relief are identical to those in Williams. For the reasons stated therein, the judgment is
Affirmed.