Case Name: CITY OF BRIDGETON, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Greg FLERLAGE, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-12-18
Citations: 387 S.W.3d 421
Docket Number: No. ED 97540
Parties: CITY OF BRIDGETON, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Greg FLERLAGE, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and LISA VAN AMBURG, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 387
Pages: 421–421

Head Matter:
CITY OF BRIDGETON, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Greg FLERLAGE, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 97540.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Dec. 18, 2012.
Robert Schultz, Schultz & Associates LLP, Chesterfield, MO, for respondent.
Robert C. Withington, Clayton, MO, for appellant.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and LISA VAN AMBURG, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a judgment finding defendant guilty of violating a municipal ordinance. The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 80, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a written memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance •with Rule 84.16(b).