Case Name: Quality Motors of Rochester, Inc., Appellant, v. (American) Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Company of Illinois, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1939-01-11
Citations: 256 A.D. 892
Docket Number: 
Parties: Quality Motors of Rochester, Inc., Appellant, v. (American) Lumbermen’s Mutual Casualty Company of Illinois, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 256
Pages: 892–892

Head Matter:
Quality Motors of Rochester, Inc., Appellant, v. (American) Lumbermen’s Mutual Casualty Company of Illinois, Respondent.

Opinion:
Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and plaintiff's motion for judgment granted, with ten dollars costs, damages to be assessed by a jury at the Trial Term. Memorandum: There is no substantial difference between the exclusion clause in the policy in suit and the exclusion clause in the policy under consideration in Smith v. American Automobile Fire Insurance Co. (274 N. Y. 626). As the facts and circumstances in the two cases are similar, that case is controlling in this action. (See, also, Dibble v. Travelers Ins. Co., 163 Misc. 540.) All concur. (The order denies plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in an action under a liability insurance policy.) Present — Sears, P. J., Lewis, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.