Case Name: STATE OF OREGON v. FORD
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1966-01-26
Citations: 242 Or. 449
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF OREGON v. FORD
Judges: Before McAllister, Chief Justice, and Perry, Sloan, Goodwin, Denecke, Holman and Schwab, Justices.
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 242
Pages: 449–450

Head Matter:
Argued October 6, 1965,
affirmed January 26, 1966
STATE OF OREGON v. FORD
410 P. 2d 223
William P. Brandsness, Klamath Falls, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were Coe & Brandsness, Klamath Falls.
J. B. Thomas, Deputy District Attorney, Klamath Falls, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Sam A. McKeen, District Attorney, and Harry D. Lewis, Deputy Dis-trict Attorney, Klamath Falls.
Before McAllister, Chief Justice, and Perry, Sloan, Goodwin, Denecke, Holman and Schwab, Justices.

Opinion:
PERRY, J.
The defendant was convicted of the crime of knowingly uttering and publishing a forged bank check and appeals.
On appeal, the defendant contends for the first time that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence, without objection, handwriting samples executed by the defendant at the request of a city police officer. The basis of his objection is that the evidence does not show that the defendant was first warned of his constitutional right to remain silent and his right to the appointment of counsel.
This issue has this day been decided adversely to the contention of the defendant. State v. Fisher, 242 Or 419, 410 P2d 216.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.