Case Name: Daro Industries, Inc., et al., Respondents, v. RAS Enterprises, Inc., et al., Appellants
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1978-07-06
Citations: 44 N.Y. 969
Docket Number: 
Parties: Daro Industries, Inc., et al., Respondents, v RAS Enterprises, Inc., et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 44
Pages: 969–971

Head Matter:
Daro Industries, Inc., et al., Respondents, v RAS Enterprises, Inc., et al., Appellants.
Submitted June 5, 1978;
decided July 6, 1978
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Herbert Monte Levy for appellants.
William L. Finger and Stephanie Graff Stavin for respondents.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division. We would only add that the powers of a temporary receiver are limited to those enumerated in the appointing order. (CPLR 6401, subd [b].) Since the temporary receiver in this case was not expressly granted the power to sue for claims of the corporation arising before his appointment, that power is retained by the corporation.
Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum. Question certified answered in the affirmative.