Case Name: JAMES STRONG ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. EDWIN A. GASKILL ET AL., DEFENDANTS IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1891-06
Citations: 53 N.J.L. 665
Docket Number: 
Parties: JAMES STRONG ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. EDWIN A. GASKILL ET AL., DEFENDANTS IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 53
Pages: 665–665

Head Matter:
JAMES STRONG ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. EDWIN A. GASKILL ET AL., DEFENDANTS IN ERROR.
■On error to the Burlington Circuit.
Eor the plaintiffs in error, IAndley M. Garrison.
For the defendants in error, David J. Pancoast.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment in this case is affirmed, for the reasons given by the court below.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Depue, Scudder, Van Syckel, Clement, Smith, Whitaker. 8.
For reversal—Dixon, Knapp, Mague, Reed. 4.