Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Hank X. CRUTCHFIELD, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2013-08-06
Citations: 407 S.W.3d 693
Docket Number: No. WD 75998
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Hank X. CRUTCHFIELD, Appellant.
Judges: Before Division Three: LISA WHITE HARDWICK, Presiding Judge, MARK D. PFEIFFER, Judge and CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 407
Pages: 693–694

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Hank X. CRUTCHFIELD, Appellant.
No. WD 75998.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Aug. 6, 2013.
Rehearing Denied Oct. 1, 2013.
Kate E. Noland, Liberty, MO, for respondent.
Michael W. Walker, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
Before Division Three: LISA WHITE HARDWICK, Presiding Judge, MARK D. PFEIFFER, Judge and CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Hank Crutchfield appeals the trial court's judgment finding him guilty of driving while intoxicated after a bench trial. Crutchfield claims that the trial court erred in: (1) denying his pretrial motion to suppress which alleged that driver's license checkpoints are a per se violation of the Fourth Amendment; and (2) admitting evidence of a "Driver License Checkpoint Written Plan" because the Plan did not satisfy requirements for ensuring that a checkpoint is not an unconstitutional random stop. Because there was reasonable suspicion for the stop of Crutchfield, irrespective of the driver's license checkpoint, we are not required to reach the issues raised by Crutchfield on appeal. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).