Case Name: Deborah COX, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1987-04-28
Citations: 506 So. 2d 53
Docket Number: No. 85-2229
Parties: Deborah COX, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 506
Pages: 53–54

Head Matter:
Deborah COX, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 85-2229.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 28, 1987.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and N. Joseph Durant, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Charles M. Fahlbusch, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before BARKDULL, BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Finding that the trial court's failure to exclude defendant's post-Miranda statement used by the state to rebut defendant's insanity defense falls within the prohibitions of Wainwright v. Greenfield, 474 U.S. 284, 106 S.Ct. 634, 88 L.Ed.2d 623 (1986), and State v. Burwick, 442 So.2d 944 (Fla.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 931, 104 S.Ct. 1719, 80 L.Ed.2d 191 (1983), we reverse and remand for a new trial.
Reversed and remanded.