Case Name: James C. Thrall, Jr., Respondent, v. City of Syracuse et al., Appellants
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1983-11-29
Citations: 60 N.Y.2d 950
Docket Number: 
Parties: James C. Thrall, Jr., Respondent, v City of Syracuse et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 60
Pages: 950–952

Head Matter:
James C. Thrall, Jr., Respondent, v City of Syracuse et al., Appellants.
Decided November 29, 1983
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
David M. Garber, Corporation Counsel (.Robert J. Jenkins of counsel), for appellants.
G. Robert McAllister for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed for reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum of Justice Reid S. Moule at the Appellate Division (96 AD2d 715, 716; see, also, Licari v Elliott, 57 NY2d 230, 237).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.