Case Name: SAMUEL R. STEWARD ET AL., PROSECUTORS, v. CITY OF TRENTON ET AL., DEFENDANTS
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1931-11-04
Citations: 9 N.J. Misc. 1100
Docket Number: 
Parties: SAMUEL R. STEWARD ET AL., PROSECUTORS, v. CITY OF TRENTON ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 9
Pages: 1100–1100

Head Matter:
SAMUEL R. STEWARD ET AL., PROSECUTORS, v. CITY OF TRENTON ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
Submitted May 15, 1931
Decided November 4, 1931.
Before Justices Teenchabd, Daly and Donges.
Eor the prosecutors, Joseph H. Carr and Sydney T. Smith.
Eor the defendants, Charles E. Bird and Romulus P. Rimo.

Opinion:
Pee Citkiam:.
This case is similar to No. 205 of this term, Mulleady et al. v. City of Trenton et al., and what was said in that case applies to this case.
Our conclusion is that a writ of certiorari should be awarded to prosecutors. The rule to show cause is made absolute and a writ of certiorari to review the action of the zoning board of adjustment of the city of Trenton in denying the application of prosecutors for a building permit to enclose with glass and frame enclosure a porch on property owned by them at 947 Carteret avenue, in said city of Trenton, is awarded.