Case Name: Frederick VANAUKEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2009-01-30
Citations: 1 So. 3d 368
Docket Number: No. 5D08-2995
Parties: Frederick VANAUKEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: GRIFFIN, LAWSON and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 1
Pages: 368–369

Head Matter:
Frederick VANAUKEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D08-2995.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Jan. 30, 2009.
Mark D. Rodriguez, of Law Office of Mark D. Rodriguez, Inverness, for Appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Ap-pellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Frederick Vanauken appeals from the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The State appropriately concedes error as to claims 4, 5, 11, and 12. On remand, the trial court shall attach to its order portions of the record conclusively refuting these claims or, alternatively, conduct an eviden- tiary hearing. The remainder of the trial court's order is affirmed.
AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part; REMANDED.
GRIFFIN, LAWSON and EVANDER, JJ., concur.