Case Name: State v. Rowbotham
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2008-03-26
Citations: 117 Ohio St. 3d 1439
Docket Number: 2007-2246
Parties: State v. Rowbotham.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. I and III and hold the cause for the decision in 2007-0656 and 2007-0657, State v. Veney, Franklin App. No. 06AP-523, 2007-0hio-1295.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 117
Pages: 1439–1439

Head Matter:
2007-2246.
State v. Rowbotham.

Opinion:
Mahoning App. No. 06 MA 59.
Moyer, C.J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. I and III and hold the cause for the decision in 2007-0656 and 2007-0657, State v. Veney, Franklin App. No. 06AP-523, 2007-0hio-1295.
O'Connor, J., dissents and would accept the appeal and hold the cause for the decision in State v. Veney.