Case Name: The Hanover National Bank of the City of New York, Respondent, v. The Oriental Bank of New York, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1914-03
Citations: 162 A.D. 894
Docket Number: 
Parties: The Hanover National Bank of the City of New York, Respondent, v. The Oriental Bank of New York, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 162
Pages: 894–894

Head Matter:
The Hanover National Bank of the City of New York, Respondent, v. The Oriental Bank of New York, Appellant.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 29th day of December, 1913, denying'a motion to strike out as irrelevant certain allegations in the complaint.

Opinion:
Per- Curiam:
If the defendant desires to raise the question as to whether or not the claim is Darred by the Statute of Limitations, it cannot be done by a motion to strike out, but must be taken by answer. The order is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.