Case Name: Wilfredo MORALES, Appellant, v. John DOE, Clerk, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-12-20
Citations: 53 F. App'x 126
Docket Number: No. 02-5236
Parties: Wilfredo MORALES, Appellant, v. John DOE, Clerk, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 53
Pages: 126–127

Head Matter:
Wilfredo MORALES, Appellant, v. John DOE, Clerk, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Appellee.
No. 02-5236.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Dec. 20, 2002.
Before GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and HENDERSON and TATEL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief and appendix filed by appellant. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See Fed. R.App. 36; D.C.Cir. Rule 36(b). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the judgment of the district court be affirmed. The district court correctly determined that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction to review appellant's challenge to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's rejection of appellant's attempt to appeal from a decision by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. See Marin v. Suter, 956 F.2d 339, 340 (D.C.Cir.1992).
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.