Case Name: John Thomas ENTLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. L. YOUNG, Grievance Coordinator, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-04-23
Citations: 517 F. App'x 553
Docket Number: No. 12-35495
Parties: John Thomas ENTLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. L. YOUNG, Grievance Coordinator, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before: CANBY, IKUTA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 517
Pages: 553–553

Head Matter:
John Thomas ENTLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. L. YOUNG, Grievance Coordinator, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 12-35495.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 16, 2013.
Filed April 23, 2013.
John Thomas Entler, Walla Walla, WA, pro se.
Before: CANBY, IKUTA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Washington state prisoner John Thomas Entler appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court's dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and 1915(e)(2). Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.2000); Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir.1998) (order). We affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Entler's action challenging the prison's grievance procedures because "[t]here is no legitimate claim of entitlement to a prison grievance procedure." Mann v. Adams, 855 F.2d 639, 640 (9th Cir.1988).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3. Accordingly, Entler's request for publication is denied.