Case Name: Mauney v. Gulf Refining Co.
Court: Mississippi Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Mississippi
Decision Date: 1942-05-25
Citations: 193 Miss. 421
Docket Number: No. 35007
Parties: Mauney v. Gulf Refining Co.
Judges: 
Reporter: Mississippi Reports
Volume: 193
Pages: 421–432

Head Matter:
Mauney v. Gulf Refining Co.
(In Banc.
May 25, 1942.)
[8 So. (2d) 249.
No. 35007.]
(In Banc.
Oct. 5, 1942.)
[9 So. (2d) 780.]
Jas. A. Cunningham, Sr. & Jr., Floyd W. Cunningham, J. Enoch Cunningham, Gettys Lee, J. S. Finch, and Donald Franks, all of Booneville, for appellant.
Thus. E. Pegram and Wm. H. Anderson, both of Ripley, and Armstrong, McC'adden, Allen, Braden & Goodman, of Memphis, Tenn., for appellees.
Argued orally by Jas. A. Cunningham, for appellant, and by Thus- E. Pegram, for appellees.

Opinion:
Alexander, J.,
delivered the opinion of the court on motion.
The motion denominated a motion for diminution of the record will be treated as a motion to strike certain parts of the record, since it does not suggest that there has been any diminution of the record by omission of necessary pleadings but that certain items are improperly included.
The motion will be sustained as to the following specified items: Nos. &, 10,11,12,13, and 14, being, respectively, motion to dismiss, order on said motion, original appeal bond in former hearing, citation on original appeal, mandate, and former opinion of the court.
Sustained in part and overruled in part.