Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anil Kumar GUPTA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-03-18
Citations: 58 F. App'x 746
Docket Number: No. 02-10348, 02-10370; D.C. Nos. CR-01-00220-PMP, CR-02-00085-PMP/PAL
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Anil Kumar GUPTA, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 58
Pages: 746–746

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Anil Kumar GUPTA, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 02-10348, 02-10370.
D.C. Nos. CR-01-00220-PMP, CR-02-00085-PMP/PAL.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 10, 2003.
Decided March 18, 2003.
Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Anil Kumar Gupta appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to two counts of wire fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343) in District Court Case No. CR-02-085PMP(PAL) and one count of conspiracy (18 U.S.C. § 371) in District Court Case No. CR-01-220-PMP(RJJ). . Gupta contends that the district court erred in denying his motion for a downward departure due to the harshness of conditions under which Gupta was forced to live while a federal detainee at the North Las Vegas Detention Center. We lack jurisdiction because Gupta knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal. United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182-83 (9th Cir.2000).
These appeals are DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.