Case Name: Annie Burgess, Respondent, v. Leon's Auto Collision, Inc., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1977-03-29
Citations: 91 Misc. 2d 128
Docket Number: 
Parties: Annie Burgess, Respondent, v Leon’s Auto Collision, Inc., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 91
Pages: 128–129

Head Matter:
Annie Burgess, Respondent, v Leon’s Auto Collision, Inc., Appellant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
March 29, 1977
Bornstein & Bornstein (David Bornstein of counsel), for appellant. Rudy Hirschheimer for respondent.

Opinion:
Memorandum. Judgment and order (see 87 Misc 2d 351) affirmed, without costs.
The lower court's judgment in favor of plaintiff and its denial of defendant's motion were proper under the circum stances herein. We do not pass upon the admissibility of the "Authorization to Repair" since the court below specifically found that, even if the document was admitted into evidence, it would still have determined that plaintiff did not sign the "Authorization to Repair". Accordingly, any issue as to the document's admissibility is academic.
Concur: Rinaldi, P. J., Weinstein and Thompson, JJ.