Case Name: Christopher Q. REID, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EG&G TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-02-21
Citations: 466 F. App'x 288
Docket Number: No. 11-2128
Parties: Christopher Q. REID, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EG&G TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 466
Pages: 288–288

Head Matter:
Christopher Q. REID, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EG&G TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-2128.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 16, 2012.
Decided: Feb. 21, 2012.
Christopher Q. Reid, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Michael Lucas, Jackson Lewis, LLP, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Q. Reid appeals the magistrate judge's final order granting EG&G Technical Services Inc.'s motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Reid v. EG&G Technical Sens., Inc., No. 2:10-cv-00448-TEM, 2011 WL 3440029 (EJD.Va. Aug. 8, 2011). We deny Reid's pending motions to seal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
The parties consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by the magistrate judge, as permitted by 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2006).