Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Miguel ARAIZA-REYES, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-12-07
Citations: 452 F. App'x 559
Docket Number: No. 11-50358
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Miguel ARAIZA-REYES, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before BENAVIDES, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 452
Pages: 559–560

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Miguel ARAIZA-REYES, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-50358
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 7, 2011.
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Christopher Alien Antcliff, Esq., El Paso, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Miguel Araiza-Reyes, Post, TX, pro se.
Before BENAVIDES, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Miguel Araiza-Reyes has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Araiza-Reyes has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Araiza-Reyes's response. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.