Case Name: In the Interest of: B.M., T.M., and C.M., Juvenile Officer, Respondents, v. B.M. (Mother), Appellant, B.M. (Father), Defendant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-02-25
Citations: 98 S.W.3d 98
Docket Number: Nos. WD 61732, WD 61733, WD 61734
Parties: In the Interest of: B.M., T.M., and C.M., Juvenile Officer, Respondents, v. B.M. (Mother), Appellant, B.M. (Father), Defendant.
Judges: HOWARD, P.J., LOWENSTEIN and HARDWICK, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 98
Pages: 98–98

Head Matter:
In the Interest of: B.M., T.M., and C.M., Juvenile Officer, Respondents, v. B.M. (Mother), Appellant, B.M. (Father), Defendant.
Nos. WD 61732, WD 61733, WD 61734.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Feb. 25, 2003.
Tony Shapiro, Overland Park, KS, for Appellant, B.M.
Constance Marie Alvey, Kansas City, MO, for Respondent.
Johhn Brock Rowatt, Kansas City, MO, for Defendant, B.M.
Katherine J. Rodgers, Attorney and Guardian.
HOWARD, P.J., LOWENSTEIN and HARDWICK, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The juvenile court terminated B.M.'s parental rights to her three children, B.M., Jr., T.M., and C.M. under § 211.447.4(2) and (3). Appellant contends the judgment was against the weight of the evidence. Clear, cogent and convincing evidence in the record supported termination on both grounds. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
. All statutory references are to Mo.Rev.Stat. (2000), unless indicated otherwise.