Case Name: William Edward FRITZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Allyn AKOSOMITAS; Det. Kimberly Milks, Defendants-Appellees, and Cody Groeber; Mason West, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-07-24
Citations: 610 F. App'x 268
Docket Number: No. 15-6530
Parties: William Edward FRITZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Allyn AKOSOMITAS; Det. Kimberly Milks, Defendants-Appellees, and Cody Groeber; Mason West, Defendants.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 610
Pages: 268–268

Head Matter:
William Edward FRITZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Allyn AKOSOMITAS; Det. Kimberly Milks, Defendants-Appellees, and Cody Groeber; Mason West, Defendants.
No. 15-6530.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 21, 2015.
Decided: July 24, 2015.
William Edward Fritz, Appellant Pro Se. Robin Lilley Jackson, Sandra J. Senn, Senn Legal, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this.circuit.
PER CURIAM:
William Edward Fritz appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fritz v. Akosomitas, No. 2:13-cv-03532-RMG, 2015 WL 1346311 (D.S.C. Mar. 23, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.