Case Name: U.S., Appellant v. Lieutenant Colonel Todd E. McDowell, Appellee and Senior Airman Christopher A. Demario, Real Party In Interest
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-04-11
Citations: 73 M.J. 287
Docket Number: No. 14-5005/AF
Parties: U.S., Appellant v. Lieutenant Colonel Todd E. McDowell, Appellee and Senior Airman Christopher A. Demario, Real Party In Interest.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Military Justice Reporter
Volume: 73
Pages: 287–287

Head Matter:
Friday, April 11, 2014
No. 14-5005/AF.
U.S., Appellant v. Lieutenant Colonel Todd E. McDowell, Appellee and Senior Airman Christopher A. Demario, Real Party In Interest.

Opinion:
CCA 2013-28. Notice is hereby given that a certificate for review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals was filed under Rule 22 this date on the following issues:
WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED WHEN IT DENIED THE UNITED STATES' PETITION FOR EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF AND FOUND THE MILITARY JUDGE'S RULINGS DID NOT CONSTITUTE A JUDICIAL USURPATION OF POWER AND WERE NOT CHARACTERISTIC OF AN ERRONEOUS PRACTICE WHICH IS LIKELY TO RECUR.
WHETHER THIS HONORABLE COURT SHOULD ORDER THE MILITARY JUDGE TO REVERSE HIS DECISIONS TO ORDER AN ORAL DEPOSITION OF B.B. AND TO RE-OPEN THE ARTICLE 32 PRETRIAL INVESTIGATION.