Case Name: In the Matter of David Casselman, Respondent, v. Village of Lowville, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2003-12-31
Citations: 2 A.D.3d 1281
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of David Casselman, Respondent, v Village of Lowville, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 2
Pages: 1281–1282

Head Matter:
In the Matter of David Casselman, Respondent, v Village of Lowville, Appellant.
[768 NYS2d 890]

Opinion:
Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of Supreme Court, Jefferson County (Gilbert, J.), entered December 19, 2002, which granted the petition and annulled the determination denying petitioner's application for General Municipal Law § 207-c benefits.
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed with costs.
Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging respondent's determination to deny his application for benefits under General Municipal Law § 207-c on the ground that petitioner's injury was not "incurred in the performance of special work related to the nature of heightened risks and duties" of police work (Balcerak v County of Nassau, 94 NY2d 253, 259 [1999]). Supreme Court properly granted the petition and annulled the determination. "[I]n order to be eligible for section 207-c benefits, a covered municipal employee need only prove a 'direct causal relationship between job duties and the resulting illness or injury' " (Matter of Theroux v Reilly, 1 NY3d 232, 243-244 [2003]). Petitioner proved such a direct causal relationship and thus demonstrated his entitlement to benefits under General Municipal Law § 207-c. Present—Green, J.P., Wisner, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Hayes, JJ.