Case Name: Charles S. CANCELLIERE, Appellant, v. BANCFLORIDA FSB and Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-11-27
Citations: 590 So. 2d 23
Docket Number: No. 91-01244
Parties: Charles S. CANCELLIERE, Appellant, v. BANCFLORIDA FSB and Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, Appellees.
Judges: RYDER, A.CX, and PARKER, J., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 590
Pages: 23–24

Head Matter:
Charles S. CANCELLIERE, Appellant, v. BANCFLORIDA FSB and Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, Appellees.
No. 91-01244.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Nov. 27, 1991.
Kinley I. Engvalson of Duncan & Engvalson, P.A., Fort Myers, for appellant.
John D. Maher, Tallahassee, for appellee Unemployment Appeals Comm’n.

Opinion:
LEHAN, Judge.
We affirm the denial of unemployment compensation to the former bank employee by reason of his misconduct. During the time he had been vice-president in charge of corporate banking, the employee had written a number of overdrafts on his account with the bank contrary to the bank's rules promulgated to its employees and had continued to do so after having been warned. See Azzari v. Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation Board, 104 Pa.Commw. 254, 521 A.2d 539 (Pa.Commw.Ct.1987) (employee flatly refused to work out repayment schedule with employer after defaulting on loan). Compare Billingsley v. Iowa Dept. of Job Service, 338 N.W.2d 538 (Iowa Ct.App.1983); Tarver v. Ross, 64 A.D.2d 760, 406 N.Y.S.2d 928 (N.Y.App.Div.1978) (no showing that overdrafts by employee in account with employee bank were intentional).
RYDER, A.CX, and PARKER, J., concur.