Case Name: CITY OF MIAMI, a municipal corporation existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Florida and Southeast Title & Insurance Company, successor to Southeastern Surety Company, a surety company, Appellants, v. OLBACK, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1961-10-23
Citations: 133 So. 2d 657
Docket Number: No. 61-64
Parties: CITY OF MIAMI, a municipal corporation existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Florida and Southeast Title & Insurance Company, successor to Southeastern Surety Company, a surety company, Appellants, v. OLBACK, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.
Judges: Before PEARSON, TILLMAN, C. J., and HORTON and BARKDULL, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 133
Pages: 657–657

Head Matter:
CITY OF MIAMI, a municipal corporation existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Florida and Southeast Title & Insurance Company, successor to Southeastern Surety Company, a surety company, Appellants, v. OLBACK, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.
No. 61-64.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
Oct. 23, 1961.
Edward J. Fitzpatrick, Acting City Atty., and Jack R. Rice, Jr., Asst. City Atty., Moore & Moore, Miami, for appellants.
Daniel Neal Heller, Dean, Adams, Fischer & Gautier, Miami, for appellee.
Before PEARSON, TILLMAN, C. J., and HORTON and BARKDULL, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The defendants who were also cross-claimants in an action for a declaratory decree, appeal a decree declaring that the plaintiff, Olbaclc, Inc., was not liable for the paving of a street even though it is the successor of a subdivider who undertook to pave the street.
The interest of the city is not apparent, inasmuch as the street was paved by the surety upon the bond provided by the sub-divider. The finding of the chancellor that the surety acted as a volunteer because the city had previously waived the requirement for the paving is supported by sufficient evidence in the record to withstand review by an appellate court. E. g., Brenner v. Smullian, Fla.1955, 84 So.2d 44, 49; E. O. Painter Fertilizer Co. v. Foss, 107 Fla. 464, 145 So. 253, 254.
Affirmed.