Case Name: Florence E. Gates v. City of Hartford et al.
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1956-03-16
Citations: 143 Conn. 289
Docket Number: 
Parties: Florence E. Gates v. City of Hartford et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 143
Pages: 289–290

Head Matter:
Florence E. Gates v. City of Hartford et al.
Inglis, C. J., Baldwin, O'Sullivan, Wynne and Daly, Js.
Argued February 10
decided March 16, 1956
Horace E. Rockwell, for the appellant (plaintiff).
Frank A. Murphy, with whom, on the brief, were John J. Kenny and Alexander A. Ooldfarb, for the appellees (named defendant et al.).

Opinion:
Baldwin, J.
The basic facts in this case are similar to those in Sullivan v. Town Council, decided this day, and they present the identical legal question. The decision of that case controls the decision of this one.
There is error, the judgment is set aside and the case is remanded with direction to deny the motion to erase.
In this opinion the other judges concurred.