Case Name: Raul PELEGRINA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-06-06
Citations: 763 So. 2d 1231
Docket Number: No. 1D99-256
Parties: Raul PELEGRINA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: MINER, WEBSTER and LAWRENCE, JJ., CONCUR.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 763
Pages: 1231–1231

Head Matter:
Raul PELEGRINA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D99-256.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
June 6, 2000.
Stephen G. Cobb, Shalimar, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; James W. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Because the plea agreement permitted a sentence at the trial court's discretion, we affirm the denial of appellant's motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). However, because it appears from the record that the parties (including appellant and his attorney) may have been under the mistaken impression that the 1995 sentencing guidelines, rather than the 1992, were applicable, and that, pursuant to the latter, the maximum permissible sentence would have been significantly shorter than that imposed pursuant to the former, our affirmance is without prejudice to appellant's right timely to file a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 seeking to withdraw his plea.
MINER, WEBSTER and LAWRENCE, JJ., CONCUR.