Case Name: Lucinda G. MILLER; Elaine King-Miller, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-08-12
Citations: 342 F.3d 563
Docket Number: No. 02-10190
Parties: Lucinda G. MILLER; Elaine King-Miller, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, DENNIS, CLEMENT and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 342
Pages: 563–563

Head Matter:
Lucinda G. MILLER; Elaine King-Miller, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-10190.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 12, 2003.
Bradley W. Howard, Grant A. Bannen, Brown & Fortunato, Amarillo, TX, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.
Amy Warr, David Earl Jenkins, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, TX, for Defendants Appellant.
Kevin K Russell, Jessica Dunsay Silver, U.S. Dept, of Justice, Civil Rights Div., Washington, DC, for Intervenor.

Opinion:
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, DENNIS, CLEMENT and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc. No decision has yet been made with respect to oral argument. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.