Case Name: JUDICIAL ETHICS OPINION 1998-8
Court: Oklahoma Judicial Ethics Advisory Panel
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1998-07-21
Citations: 86 P.3d 652
Docket Number: No. 1998-8
Parties: JUDICIAL ETHICS OPINION 1998-8.
Judges: 
Reporter: Pacific Reporter 3d
Volume: 86
Pages: 652–653

Head Matter:
1998 OK JUD ETH 8
JUDICIAL ETHICS OPINION 1998-8.
No. 1998-8.
Oklahoma Judicial Ethics Advisory Panel.
Decided July 21, 1998.
Filed: July 24, 1998.

Opinion:
QUESTION: What is contemplated by the term, "Family" as used in Canon 5 of the Canons of Judicial Ethics?
WE ANSWER: Canon 5(A)(3) provides: "A candidate for judicial office: (a) should maintain the dignity appropriate to judicial office and act in a manner consistent with the integrity and independence of the judiciary, and should encourage members of the candidate's family to adhere to the same standards of political conduct in support of the candidate as apply to the candidate ."
In the ordinary sense, a "family" is considered by most dictionaries as a collective body of persons who live in one house or within the curtilege. Black's Law Dictionary, includes a more narrow definition to include the immediate members of one's household, specifically, wife, children, brothers, sisters or father and mother.
It is our opinion that Canon 5 uses "family" member as defined above in the sense of family member over which a judicial candidate would have persuasive influence if not out right control.
/s/ Robert L. Bailey, Chairman
/s/ Robert A. Layden, Vice Chairman
/s/ Milton C. Craig, Secretary