Case Name: Dwayne E. HINKLE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-06-22
Citations: 136 S.W.3d 849
Docket Number: No. ED 83797
Parties: Dwayne E. HINKLE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before BOOKER T. SHAW, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 136
Pages: 849–849

Head Matter:
Dwayne E. HINKLE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 83797.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
June 22, 2004.
Lisa M. Stroup, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Andrea Kaye Spillars, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before BOOKER T. SHAW, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Dwayne E. Hinkle (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without a hearing. Movant asserts his plea counsel was ineffective for misleading him into pleading guilty by guaranteeing him that he would receive less than twenty-five years.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court's decision is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).