Case Name: Billie Jean McGOWAN, Individually and as Natural Tutrix of Her Minor Child, Cheryl Sue McGowan v. Don SCHMIEDER, d/b/a Schmieder Enterprises, His Builders' Risk and Liability Insurers, and Roy C. Rackley, Jr.
Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1979-10-08
Citations: 376 So. 2d 1055
Docket Number: No. 12762
Parties: Billie Jean McGOWAN, Individually and as Natural Tutrix of Her Minor Child, Cheryl Sue McGowan v. Don SCHMIEDER, d/b/a Schmieder Enterprises, His Builders’ Risk and Liability Insurers, and Roy C. Rackley, Jr.
Judges: Before ELLIS, CHIASSON and PONDER, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 376
Pages: 1055–1055

Head Matter:
Billie Jean McGOWAN, Individually and as Natural Tutrix of Her Minor Child, Cheryl Sue McGowan v. Don SCHMIEDER, d/b/a Schmieder Enterprises, His Builders’ Risk and Liability Insurers, and Roy C. Rackley, Jr.
No. 12762.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.
Oct. 8, 1979.
Rehearing Denied Nov. 29, 1979.
Gilbert L. Dozier, Gary L. Keyser, Thomas K. Kirkpatrick, Baton Rouge, for plaintiffs-appellees, Billie Jean McGowan, Indiv., etc.
John A. Bivins, Lafayette, for defendants-appellants, Rust Engineering Company and American Mutual Liability Ins. Co.
David W. Robinson, Baton Rouge, for defendants-appellees, Don H. Schmieder, d/b/a Schmieder Enterprises and John McLaughlin.
Harris D. Copenhaver, Jr., Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellant, Roy C. Rackley, Jr.
William J. Doran, Jr., Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellee, Richard D. Schmieder.
Walter G. Monsour, Jr., and Frank J. Gremillion, Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellant, City of Baton Rouge.
Ben W. Lightfoot, Baton Rouge, for in-tervenor-appellee, Hanover Ins. Co.
Before ELLIS, CHIASSON and PONDER, JJ.

Opinion:
ELLIS, Judge:
For the reasons expressed in Stewart v. Schmieder, 376 So.2d 1046 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1979), the judgment appealed from is reversed in part and there will be judgment in favor of Rust Engineering Company and American Mutual Liability Insurance Company, dismissing plaintiffs' suit as to them. In all other respects the judgment is affirmed, at the costs of defendants Rackley and the City-Parish.
AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND RENDERED.