Case Name: JOHN SAHAKIAN, Appellant, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Respondents
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1928-05-14
Citations: 91 Cal. App. 737
Docket Number: Civ. No. 4884
Parties: JOHN SAHAKIAN, Appellant, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports
Volume: 91
Pages: 737–738

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 4884.
Second Appellate District, Division Two.
May 14, 1928.]
JOHN SAHAKIAN, Appellant, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Respondents.
Nathaniel R. Rutherford for Appellant.
Jess E. Stephens, City Attorney, and Chas. B. MacCoy, Deputy City Attorney, for Respondents.

Opinion:
HAZLETT, J., pro tem.
Plaintiff states in his opening brief in his appeal herein that defendant City of Los An geles filed a general demurrer to his complaint, which the trial court sustained without granting him leave to amend; and that "our only alternative is this appeal." From this statement we understand that he attempts to appeal from the order sustaining the demurrer without leave to amend, and his notice of appeal shows that he appeals from the order and not from the judgment thereon. Such order is not one from which an appeal lies. (See. 963, Code Civ. Proc.; People v. Goodell, 72 Cal. App. 452 [237 Pac. 829]; 2 Cal. Jur. 156.)
The attorney for appellants in this case was substituted after the appeal was taken, and after the briefs were filed.
The appeal is dismissed.
Works, P. J., and Craig, J., concurred.