Case Name: Tung Wa Ma, an Incapacitated Person, by His Guardian, James Ma, et al., Respondents, v. New York City Transit Authority et al., Appellants, and David I. Cho et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2011-10-18
Citations: 88 A.D.3d 871
Docket Number: 
Parties: Tung Wa Ma, an Incapacitated Person, by His Guardian, James Ma, et al., Respondents, v New York City Transit Authority et al., Appellants, and David I. Cho et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 88
Pages: 871–871

Head Matter:
Tung Wa Ma, an Incapacitated Person, by His Guardian, James Ma, et al., Respondents, v New York City Transit Authority et al., Appellants, and David I. Cho et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.
[931 NYS2d 254]

Opinion:
The Supreme Court properly denied the motion of the defendants New York City Transit Authority, New York City Metropolitan Transportation Authority, MTA Bus Company, and Ernie Lamboy (hereinafter collectively the appellants) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them, as the appellants failed to establish their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. The appellants failed to establish that they were free from negligence as a matter of law (see Pollack v Margolin, 84 AD3d 1341, 1342 [2011]; Lopez v Reyes-Flores, 52 AD3d 785, 786 [2008]). Rivera, J.E, Florio, Austin and Sgroi, JJ., concur.