Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bryan John TRINIDAD, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-08-31
Citations: 344 F. App'x 350
Docket Number: No. 09-30021
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bryan John TRINIDAD, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: WALLACE, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 344
Pages: 350–350

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bryan John TRINIDAD, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-30021.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 20, 2009.
Filed Aug. 31, 2009.
Michael S. Lahr, Assistant U.S., USHE-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Helena, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Evangelo Arvanetes, Assistant Federal Public Defender, FDMT-Federal Defenders of Montana, Great Falls, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: WALLACE, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Bryan John Trinidad appeals from the 78-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for possession of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Trinidad contends that the district court did not adequately address the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, and that his sentence is unreasonable.
The record reflects that the district court adequately explained its decision, see United States v. Perez-Perez, 512 F.3d 514, 516 (9th Cir.2008), and the sentence was reasonable, see United States v. Cherer, 513 F.3d 1150, 1160-61 (9th Cir.2008).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.