Case Name: Amy WORTHY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-12-11
Citations: 831 So. 2d 818
Docket Number: No. 4D02-4047
Parties: Amy WORTHY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: STEVENSON, HAZOURI and MAY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 831
Pages: 818–818

Head Matter:
Amy WORTHY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D02-4047.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Dec. 11, 2002.
Amy Worthy, Ft. Lauderdale, pro se.
Richard E. Doran, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and David M. Schultz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Amy Worthy appeals the summary denial of her motion under Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Worthy alleged that defense counsel affirmatively mislead her with regard to the forfeiture of gain time, and that she relied on the misadvice when she entered her plea. The record before this court supports Worthy's claim.
Consequently, we reverse the order that summarily denied relief and remand for the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing or to attach documents to refute the claim. State v. Leroux, 689 So.2d 235 (Fla.1996); Dellahoy v. State, 816 So.2d 1253 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); Brazeail v. State, 821 So.2d 364 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).
STEVENSON, HAZOURI and MAY, JJ., concur.