Case Name: Joseph Hugo GIBBS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of SOUTH CAROLINA; Gary Maynard, Director of SCDC; William D. Catoe, former Director of SCDC, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-07-31
Citations: 42 F. App'x 597
Docket Number: No. 02-6135
Parties: Joseph Hugo GIBBS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of SOUTH CAROLINA; Gary Maynard, Director of SCDC; William D. Catoe, former Director of SCDC, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 42
Pages: 597–598

Head Matter:
Joseph Hugo GIBBS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of SOUTH CAROLINA; Gary Maynard, Director of SCDC; William D. Catoe, former Director of SCDC, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 02-6135.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 25, 2002.
Decided July 31, 2002.
Joseph Hugo Gibbs, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Joseph Hugo Gibbs appeals the district court's orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2002) complaint and denying his motions for reconsideration and to amend the judgment order. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Gibbs v. South Carolina, No. CA-01-3646-3-10BC (D.S.C. Oct. 23, 2001; filed Nov. 30, 2001 & entered Dec. 3, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.