Case Name: Carlos VILLAR and Argelia Villar, Appellants, v. Dr. Bertha M. OLAZABAL, M.D., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-06-26
Citations: 675 So. 2d 710
Docket Number: No. 95-1458
Parties: Carlos VILLAR and Argelia Villar, Appellants, v. Dr. Bertha M. OLAZABAL, M.D., Appellee.
Judges: Before JORGENSON, GODERICH and GREEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 675
Pages: 710–711

Head Matter:
Carlos VILLAR and Argelia Villar, Appellants, v. Dr. Bertha M. OLAZABAL, M.D., Appellee.
No. 95-1458.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
June 26, 1996.
Beckham & Beckham and Pamela Beck-ham, North Miami Beach, for appellants.
Stephens, Lynn, Klein & McNicholas and Philip D. Parrish, Miami, for appellee.
Before JORGENSON, GODERICH and GREEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court's order dismissing the plaintiffs' complaint because as a matter of law the impact rule bars these causes of action and the facts of this case do not fall within the narrow exceptions to the impact rule. See Zell v. Meek, 665 So.2d 1048 (Fla.1995); Champion v. Gray, 478 So.2d 17 (Fla.1985); Sguros v. Biscayne Recreation Dev. Co., 528 So.2d 376 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), review denied, 525 So.2d 880 (Fla.1988).
Affirmed.