Case Name: Edith OROZCO-ROSAS, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-07-03
Citations: 176 F. App'x 905
Docket Number: No. 05-76929
Parties: Edith OROZCO-ROSAS, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 176
Pages: 905–906

Head Matter:
Edith OROZCO-ROSAS, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 05-76929.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
July 3, 2006.
Edith Orozco-Rosas, Moreno Valley, CA, pro se.
CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, David V. Bernal, Attorney, Jamie M. Dowd, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: PREGERSON, TALLMAN and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Respondent's unopposed motion to dismiss this petition for review for lack of jurisdiction is granted. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir.2003); Montero-Martinez v. Ashcroft, 277 F.3d 1137, 1144 (9th Cir.2002).
All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal and voluntary departure confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate. See Desta v. Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004).
DISMISSED.