Case Name: Jerry L. THOMPSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-01-26
Citations: 667 So. 2d 447
Docket Number: No. 94-03463
Parties: Jerry L. THOMPSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: LAZZARA and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 667
Pages: 447–447

Head Matter:
Jerry L. THOMPSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 94-03463.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Jan. 26, 1996.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Julia Diaz, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Robert A Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and John M. Klawikofsky, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

Opinion:
FRANK, Acting Chief Judge.
Jerry L. Thompson has appealed from his conviction for attempted second degree murder. We find no error in the asserted impermissible admission of evidence, and we affirm the judgment and sentence.
Certain special conditions of probation imposed at sentencing, however, were not orally pronounced and must be stricken: (1) portions of condition number four that prohibit carrying of weapons not enumerated in section 790.23, Florida Statutes (1993); (2) that portion of condition number seven prohibiting the defendant from using intoxicants to excess; and (3) that portion of condition twelve requiring the defendant to pay for breathalyzer, blood, or urine tests, unless the fee is waived by an officer. Malone v. State, 652 So.2d 902 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Tomlinson v. State, 645 So.2d 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). Furthermore, the $2.00 cost imposed pursuant to section 943.25(13), Florida Statutes (1993), should also be stricken. Watson v. State, 647 So.2d 245 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).
Judgment and sentence affirmed but we strike the improper probation conditions and the $2.00 cost.
LAZZARA and QUINCE, JJ., concur.