Case Name: Latif BLAGMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James R. WHITE, Superintendent; Ms. Evanchyk, Assistant Superintendent, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-02-01
Citations: 3 F. App'x 23
Docket Number: No. 00-7355
Parties: Latif BLAGMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James R. WHITE, Superintendent; Ms. Evanchyk, Assistant Superintendent, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 3
Pages: 23–23

Head Matter:
Latif BLAGMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James R. WHITE, Superintendent; Ms. Evanchyk, Assistant Superintendent, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 00-7355.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 10, 2001.
Decided Feb. 1, 2001.
Latif Blagman, pro se.
Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for appellees.
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Latif Blagman appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Blagman v. White, No. CA-99-538-AM (E.D.Va. Sept. 18, 2000). We also deny Blagman's request for appointment of counsel. Whisenant v. Yuam, 739 F.2d 160, 163 (4th Cir.1984). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.