Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Curtis L. JOHNSON, Defendant/Appellant; Curtis L. JOHNSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1996-12-17
Citations: 936 S.W.2d 236
Docket Number: Nos. 66731, 69580
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Curtis L. JOHNSON, Defendant/Appellant. Curtis L. JOHNSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANE, P.J., and GERALD M. SMITH and PUDLOWSKI, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 936
Pages: 236–237

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Curtis L. JOHNSON, Defendant/Appellant. Curtis L. JOHNSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent.
Nos. 66731, 69580.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Dec. 17, 1996.
Emmett D. Queener, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for defendant/appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff/respondent.
Before CRANE, P.J., and GERALD M. SMITH and PUDLOWSKI, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant Curtis Johnson appeals Ms conviction after a jury trial of two counts of first degree assault (Counts I and III), in violation of § 565.050 RSMo 1994 and two counts of armed criminal action (Counts II and IV), in violation of § 571.015 RSMo 1994, on wMch he was sentenced to consecutive terms of twenty years on Counts I and III and concurrent terms of twenty years on Counts II and IV. Johnson also appeals from a judgment denying on the merits, after an eviden-tiary hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion.
No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opirnon. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for tMs order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).