Case Name: HARLEY-DAVIDSON MOTOR COMPANY v. SPRINGETTSBURY TOWNSHIP, Central York School District and York County Board of Tax Assessment Appeals. Petition of Central York School District
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2014-07-30
Citations: 626 Pa. 408
Docket Number: No. 39 MAL 2014
Parties: HARLEY-DAVIDSON MOTOR COMPANY v. SPRINGETTSBURY TOWNSHIP, Central York School District and York County Board of Tax Assessment Appeals. Petition of Central York School District.
Judges: 
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 626
Pages: 408–408

Head Matter:
97 A.3d 729
HARLEY-DAVIDSON MOTOR COMPANY v. SPRINGETTSBURY TOWNSHIP, Central York School District and York County Board of Tax Assessment Appeals. Petition of Central York School District.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
July 30, 2014.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 30th day of July, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are
1. Whether the trial court properly considered reasonably foreseeable hypothetical ways in which the property could be used by potential buyers to determine what a willing buyer would pay for the property consistent with the holdings in Craftmaster Mfg., Inc. v. Bradford County Board of Assessment Appeals, 903 A.2d 620 (Pa.Cmwlth.2006) and Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. v. Board of Assessment Appeals of Lehigh County, 720 A.2d 790 (Pa.Cmwlth.1998)?
2. Whether the trial court followed Commonwealth Court precedent and properly considered the impact of environmental conditions by reviewing the settlement agreement, interpreting Pennsylvania's Land Recycling and Remediation Standards Act (Act 2), accepting the opinion of an expert appraiser, and applying a five percent reduction in value for stigma?