Case Name: Julio PARDO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WESTINGHOUSE SAVANNAH RIVER COMPANY, LLC, a/k/a Washington Savannah River Company, LLC, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-10-11
Citations: 202 F. App'x 614
Docket Number: No. 06-1418
Parties: Julio PARDO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WESTINGHOUSE SAVANNAH RIVER COMPANY, LLC, a/k/a Washington Savannah River Company, LLC, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILLIAMS, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 202
Pages: 614–614

Head Matter:
Julio PARDO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WESTINGHOUSE SAVANNAH RIVER COMPANY, LLC, a/k/a Washington Savannah River Company, LLC, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 06-1418.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 22, 2006.
Decided: Oct. 11, 2006.
Julio Pardo, Appellant Pro Se. John Hagood Tighe, Edward Brandon Gaskins, Fisher & Phillips, L.L.P., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILLIAMS, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Julio Pardo appeals the district court's order granting Westinghouse Savannah River Company, LLC, summary judgment and dismissing his employment discrimination claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, with prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pardo v. Westinghouse Savannah River Co., LLC, No. 1:04-cv-01709-JRM, 2006 WL 1003779 (D.S.C. Mar. 13, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
The parties consented to adjudication by a magistrate judge.