Case Name: Burke & Co. v. Edey & Pinckard, etc. William Golding, appellant
Court: Louisiana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1869-12
Citations: 21 La. Ann. 749
Docket Number: No. 1783
Parties: Burke & Co. v. Edey & Pinckard, etc. William Golding, appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Louisiana Annual Reports
Volume: 21
Pages: 749–749

Head Matter:
No. 1783.
Burke & Co. v. Edey & Pinckard, etc. William Golding, appellant.
Objections to the reception of testimony on trial in the louver court will not be noticed in the appellate court, unless the objections are embodied in a bill of exceptions to the ruling of .the judge admitting the evidence.
When the appeal is taken for delay only, damages will be given against the appellant for frivolous appeal.
from the Fifth District Court for the parish of Orleans. Leaumont, J.
George W. Christy, for plaintiff and appellee. IF. IT. Hunt and JS. G. Whitney, for defendant and appellant.

Opinion:
IIowe, J.
William Golding has appealed from a judgment rendered against him as indorser of a promissory note. Upon the trial his counsel objected to certain testimony, hut reserved no hill of exceptions to the ruling of the Judge admitting the same. The objection cannot ho noticed. Succession of Prevost, 4 An. 347; West v. his creditors, 4 An. 447; Gray v. Thomas, 18 An. 412.
The appeal seems to he frivolous, and- to have been taken for delay meiely.
It is therefore ordered, that the judgment appealed from he affirmed with costs, and with ten per cent, damages for frivolous appeal.