Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joseph John Randazzo, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1964-10-15
Citations: 15 N.Y.2d 526
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joseph John Randazzo, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 15
Pages: 526–528

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joseph John Randazzo, Appellant.
Argued October 6, 1964;
decided October 15, 1964.
John R. Coughlin for appellant.
Frank S. Hogan, District Attorney (Joseph A. Phillips of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed. Defendant-appellant, as a parolee, was deprived of no constitutional rights by the search and seizure which was made under the circumstances of this case (People ex rel. Natoli v. Lewis, 287 N. Y. 478; Anderson v. Corall, 263 U. S. 193).
Concur: Judges' Dye, Van Voorhís, Burke, Scileppi and Bergan. Chief Judge Desmond concurs solely on the ground that the search of the parolee's apartment was incidental to his arreSt oh a valid administrative warrant; Judge Fuld dissents in the following opinion.