Case Name: Jasper Maurice WARREN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kathleen GREEN, Warden; Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services; David M. Mathis, M.D.; Correctional Medical Services, Inc.; Robert Smith, Medical Director, Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-12-06
Citations: 405 F. App'x 781
Docket Number: No. 10-6790
Parties: Jasper Maurice WARREN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Kathleen GREEN, Warden; Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services; David M. Mathis, M.D.; Correctional Medical Services, Inc.; Robert Smith, Medical Director, Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 405
Pages: 781–781

Head Matter:
Jasper Maurice WARREN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Kathleen GREEN, Warden; Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services; David M. Mathis, M.D.; Correctional Medical Services, Inc.; Robert Smith, Medical Director, Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Defendants—Appellees.
No. 10-6790.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 30, 2010.
Decided: Dec. 6, 2010.
Jasper Maurice Warren, Appellant Pro Se. Michael O’Connor Doyle, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland; Philip Melton Andrews, Ryan Alexander Mitchell, Kramon & Graham, PA, Baltimore, Maryland; Valerie L. Tetro, White-ford, Taylor & Preston, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jasper Maurice Warren appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Warren v. Green, No. 1:09-cv-01308-RDB (D.Md. Apr. 30, 2010). Warren's motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.