Case Name: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. James Hanley, Appellant
Court: Kansas City Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1886-01-25
Citations: 20 Mo. App. 420
Docket Number: 
Parties: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. James Hanley, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Missouri Appeal Reports
Volume: 20
Pages: 420–420

Head Matter:
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. James Hanley, Appellant.
Kansas City Court of Appeals,
January 25, 1886.
Akbtrmance. — Where no brief is filed and the record discloses no error or irregularity in the trial, justifying a reversal of the judgment, it will be affirmed.
Appeal from Saline Criminal Court, Hon. John E. Ryland, Judge.
Affirmed.

Opinion:
Ellison, J.
The defendant was indicted, tried and convicted for selling intoxicating liquors iuless quantities than one gallon. He appeals to this court, but does not file a brief iu the cause.
An examination of the record fails to disclose any error or irregularity in the trial, justifying a reversal of the judgment, and it is, therefore, with the concurrence of the other judges, affirmed.