Case Name: D. W. TAYLOR, Respondent, v. N. H. LAURIDSON and E. E. BARRY, Respondents; SACRAMENTO ROCHDALE COMPANY (a Co-operative Association, etc.), et al., Appellants
Court: Supreme Court of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1911-10-09
Citations: 161 Cal. 718
Docket Number: Sac. No. 1858
Parties: D. W. TAYLOR, Respondent, v. N. H. LAURIDSON and E. E. BARRY, Respondents; SACRAMENTO ROCHDALE COMPANY (a Co-operative Association, etc.), et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Reports
Volume: 161
Pages: 718–718

Head Matter:
[Sac. No. 1858.
In Bank.
October 9, 1911.]
D. W. TAYLOR, Respondent, v. N. H. LAURIDSON and E. E. BARRY, Respondents; SACRAMENTO ROCHDALE COMPANY (a Co-operative Association, etc.), et al., Appellants.
Order refusing to dissolve an injunction reversed on the authority of Willis v. Lanridson, ante, p. 106.
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Sacramento County refusing to dissolve an injunction. C. N. Post, Judge.
The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion in Willis v. Lauridson, ante, p. 106.
Grove L. Johnson, and Wahrhaftig & Shinn, for Appellants.
F. P. Atkinson, D. W. Taylor, and H. C. Ross, for Respondents.

Opinion:
THE COURT.
The questions involved herein are substantially the same as those in the case of Willis v. Lauridson, ante, p. 106, [118 Pac. 529], this day decided. Por the reasons therein given the order appealed from is reversed, with directions to the trial court to grant defendants' motion to vacate the injunction.