Case Name: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania ex rel. H. C. McCormick, Attorney General, v. William H. Shoemaker, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1896-10-05
Citations: 178 Pa. 214
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 22
Parties: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania ex rel. H. C. McCormick, Attorney General, v. William H. Shoemaker, Appellant.
Judges: Before Sterrett, C. J., Green, Williams, McCollum, Mitchell, Dean and Fell, JJ'.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 178
Pages: 214–214

Head Matter:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania ex rel. H. C. McCormick, Attorney General, v. William H. Shoemaker, Appellant.
Argued June 2, 1896.
Appeal, No. 22, May. T., 1896, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Dauphin Co., Commonwealth Docket 1896, No. 330, for plaintiff on quo warranto.
Before Sterrett, C. J., Green, Williams, McCollum, Mitchell, Dean and Fell, JJ'.
Affirmed.
A. W. Schdlck, with him Carl Wagner, for appellant.
M. E. Olmsted, John P. Elkin, deputy attorney general, and Henry O. McCormick, attorney general, for appellee.
October 5, 1896:

Opinion:
Per Curiam,
This- case was argued with numbers 21, 23, 24, and 25 of May term, 1896, involving substantially the same questions.
A careful consideration of the record has satisfied us that there is no error in the judgment. The controlling questions have been fully discussed and correctly decided by the learned trial judge. It would serve no useful purpose to add anything to what has been said by him in the opinion referred to in the record, Com. v. Morgan, supra, 198. The judgment is therefore affirmed on that opinion.