Case Name: JORDON v. ST. LOUIS & S. F. R. CO.
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1913-10-14
Citations: 42 Okla. 804
Docket Number: No. 2919
Parties: JORDON v. ST. LOUIS & S. F. R. CO.
Judges: 
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 42
Pages: 804–806

Head Matter:
JORDON v. ST. LOUIS & S. F. R. CO.
No. 2919.
Opinion Filed October 14, 1913.
On Rehearing, September 15, 1914.
(143 Pac. 46.)
APPEAL AND ERROR — Case-Made—Certification as Transcript. An appeal attempted to be brought here by case-made, but which does not affirmatively show that it was served within the three days after judgment, nor within an extension of time properly allowed by the court, cannot, after the time allowed by the statute for filing an appeal has passed, be withdrawn and certified as a transcript for the purpose of having- it considered as such.
(Syllabus by Brewer, 0.)
Error from District Court, Lincoln County; Roy Hoffman, Judge.
Action by L- M. Jordon against the St. Louis & San Eran-cisco Railroad Company. From the judgment, Jordon brings error.
Dismissed.
W. L. Johnson, for plaintiff in error.
- R. A. Kleinschmidt, J. H. Grant, Fred B. Suits, and M. D. Ozven, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
Opinion by
BREWER, C.
This appeal is prosecuted by case-made. A motion for new trial was filed on December 12, 1910. The record fails to show when this motion was acted upon. The case-made was served on opposing counsel April 19, 1911. The record is not certified as a transcript.
The record before us failing to affirmatively show that the case-made was served within three days after final judgment, or within an extension of time properly allowed by the court, the same is a nullity, and presents nothing for this court to review. The cause is dismissed. Com'rs v. Porter, 19 Okla. 173, 92 Pac. 152; Bettis v. Cargile, 23 Okla. 301, 100 Pac. 436; Lankford v. Wallace, 26 Okla. 857, 110 Pac. 672; Carr v. Thompson, 27 Okla. 7, 110 Pac. 667; Lathim v. Schlack, 27 Okla. 522, 112 Pac. 968; Willson v. Willson, 27 Okla. 419, 112 Pac. 970; McCoy v. McCoy, 27 Okla. 371, 112 Pac. 1040; School District v. Cox, 27 Okla. 459, 112 Pac. 1041; First Nat. Bank v. Oklahoma Nat. Bank, 29 Okla. 411, 118 Pac. 574; Bettis v. Cargile, 34 Okla. 319, 126 Pac. 222.