Case Name: ROLAND J. MONTOYA, Appellant, v. Dan JOHNSON, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2001-05-23
Citations: 174 Or. App. 391
Docket Number: 97-06-28971M; A100422
Parties: ROLAND J. MONTOYA, Appellant, v. Dan JOHNSON, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution, Respondent.
Judges: Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Landau, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 174
Pages: 391–392

Head Matter:
Submitted on remand from the Oregon Supreme Court July 13, 2000,
affirmed May 23, 2001
ROLAND J. MONTOYA, Appellant, v. Dan JOHNSON, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution, Respondent.
97-06-28971M; A100422
25 P3d 415
Bob Pangburn for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General, and Judy C. Lucas, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Landau, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Plaintiff appeals from the trial court's dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The crimes for which he is incarcerated took place during the time period during which the administrative rule discussed in Peek v. Thompson, 160 Or App 260, 980 P2d 178, rev dismissed 329 Or 553 (1999), was in effect. However, plaintiff made no argument in the trial court about the potential applicability of that administrative rule and attempts to raise that issue for the first time in a supplemental memorandum to this court. Because the issue was not preserved in the trial court, we do not consider it in the first instance on appeal. ORAP 5.45(4)(a).
Affirmed.