Case Name: THE CITY OF NEWARK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE NATIONAL SILK DYEING COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT; THE CITY OF NEWARK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE WEIDMANN SILK DYEING COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1923-03-13
Citations: 1 N.J. Misc. 153
Docket Number: No. 29; No. 30
Parties: THE CITY OF NEWARK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE NATIONAL SILK DYEING COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. THE CITY OF NEWARK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE WEIDMANN SILK DYEING COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 1
Pages: 153–153

Head Matter:
No. 29
THE CITY OF NEWARK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE NATIONAL SILK DYEING COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. THE CITY OF NEWARK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE WEIDMANN SILK DYEING COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
No. 30
Argued November 9 and 10, 1922
Decided March 13, 1923.
On appeal from the Passaic Circuit Court.
Before Justices Kalisch, Black and Katzenbach.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgments in the above two cases Fos. 29 and 30'are affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion in Fo. 21, the Acquackanonk Water Co. v. the Weidmann Silk Dyeing Co.
The judgments of the Passaic Circuit Court are affirmed.
Note.—See Acquackanonk Water Co. v. Weidmann Silk Dyeing Co., Adv. R., p. 248.