Case Name: Estella Joyner Baker, Defendant in Error, v. Massey Harris Company and Zurich General Accident and Liability Insurance Company, Plaintiffs in Error
Court: Kansas City Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1932-05-23
Citations: 227 Mo. App. 30
Docket Number: 
Parties: Estella Joyner Baker, Defendant in Error, v. Massey Harris Company and Zurich General Accident and Liability Insurance Company, Plaintiffs in Error.
Judges: Boyer, C., concurs.
Reporter: Missouri Appeal Reports
Volume: 227
Pages: 30–31

Head Matter:
Estella Joyner Baker, Defendant in Error, v. Massey Harris Company and Zurich General Accident and Liability Insurance Company, Plaintiffs in Error.
49 S. W. (2d) 1060.
Kansas City Court of Appeals.
May 23, 1932.
Charles L. Chalender’, Farrington <& Curtis and Paul W. Barnett for defendants in error.
Shughart & Johnson for plaintiff in error.

Opinion:
CAMPBELL, C.
The Workmen's Compensation Commission on January 16, 1930, made an award in favor of Estella Joyner Baker, defendant in error, and against Massey Harris Company and Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance Company, plaintiffs in error. The plaintiffs in error appealed from the award to the circuit court of Jackson county. Hpon hearing of the appeal the award of the commission was, on September 10, 1930, affirmed. Plaintiffs in error now seek to have reviewed upon writ of error, the judgment of the circuit court affirming the award of the commission.
In the view we take of the case, further statement is unnecessary.
It has been determined that a judgment based upon the "Workmen's Compensation Aet cannot be reviewed upon writ of error. [Wheat v. Globe Indemnity Company, 44 S. W. (2d) 168; Kristanik v. Motor Company, 41 S. W. (2d) 911; Daniels v. Box Company, 46 S. W. (2d) 1108.]
It follow's that we are without jurisdiction to review the judgment of the circuit court affirming the awárd of the commission. The writ of error is dismissed. The commissioner so recommends.
Boyer, C., concurs.
PER CURIAM:
The foregoing opinion of Campbell, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court. The writ of error is dismissed.
All concur.