Case Name: Judy M. BRAY, Personal Representative for the Estate of Roy William Bray, Petitioner on Review, v. AMERICAN PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CORP., an Oregon corporation, Respondent on Review, and Joseph E. WESTON, Marilyn Weston and American Property Management Corp., a general partnership doing business as Weston Investment Co., Defendants
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1999-08-12
Citations: 329 Or. 317
Docket Number: CC 9504 02768; CA A93122; SC S45970
Parties: Judy M. BRAY, Personal Representative for the Estate of Roy William Bray, Petitioner on Review, v. AMERICAN PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CORP., an Oregon corporation, Respondent on Review, and Joseph E. WESTON, Marilyn Weston and American Property Management Corp., a general partnership doing business as Weston Investment Co., Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 329
Pages: 317–317

Head Matter:
On petition for review filed December 9,1998,
petition for review allowed; decision of Court of Appeals vacated and case remanded to Court of Appeals for further consideration August 12, 1999
Judy M. BRAY, Personal Representative for the Estate of Roy William Bray, Petitioner on Review, v. AMERICAN PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CORP., an Oregon corporation, Respondent on Review, and Joseph E. WESTON, Marilyn Weston and American Property Management Corp., a general partnership doing business as Weston Investment Co., Defendants.
(CC 9504 02768; CA A93122; SC S45970)
984 P2d 854
Maureen Leonard and Dennis H. Elliott, Portland, filed the petition for petitioner on review.
Thomas M. Christ, Portland, filed the response and memorandum for respondent on review.
Douglas G. Schaller and Marilyn A. Heiken, of Johnson, Clifton, Larson & Corson, P.C., Eugene, filed the brief for amicus curiae Oregon Trial Lawyers Association.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of Fearing v. Bucher, 328 Or 367, 977 P2d 1163 (1999), and Lourim v. Swenson, 328 Or 380, 977 P2d 1157 (1999).