Case Name: ESTABROOK, Appellant, v. NEWBURGH LIGHT, HEAT & POWER CO., Respondent, et al.
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1912-01-19
Citations: 133 N.Y.S. 1120
Docket Number: 
Parties: ESTABROOK, Appellant, v. NEWBURGH LIGHT, HEAT & POWER CO., Respondent, et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 133
Pages: 1120–1120

Head Matter:
ESTABROOK, Appellant, v. NEWBURGH LIGHT, HEAT & POWER CO., Respondent, et al.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
January 19, 1912.)
Action by William Estabrook against the Newburgh Light, Heat & Power Company and the Orange County Traction Company.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We think, under the authority of McDonald v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co., 167 N. Y. 66, 60 N. E. 282, the case should have been submitted to the jury. Judgment and order reversed, and new trial granted, costs to abide the event. See, also, 142 App. Div. 944, 127 N. Y. Supp. 1119.