Case Name: WALLACE et al. v. GAY et al.
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1913-11-18
Citations: 39 Okla. 774
Docket Number: No. 3162
Parties: WALLACE et al. v. GAY et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 39
Pages: 774–774

Head Matter:
WALLACE et al. v. GAY et al.
No. 3162.
Opinion Filed November 18, 1913.
(136 Pac. 737.)
APPEAL AND ERROR — Presentation for Review — Motion to Reinstate» A motion to reinstate a cause, not presented in the transcript by bill of exceptions, so as to make it a part of the record, cannot be considered on appeal.
(Syllabus by Robertson, 0.)
Error from District Court, Jackson County; Frank Mathews, Judge.
Action of Sanford Gay and others against Reid Wallace and others for injunction. From an order of reinstatement after dismissal, defendants bring error.
Dismissed.
Petry & McConnell, for plaintiffs in error.
Lawson & Dabney,, Garrett & Castleman, and W. C. Austin, for defendants in error.

Opinion:
Opinion by
ROBERTSON, C.
This case involves the consideration of the identical question decided by this court in -its companion case, Hicks et al. v. Gay et al., 31 Okla. 150, 120 Pac. 636, and for the reasons therein given, this appeal should be dismissed.
By the Court: It is so ordered.