Case Name: H. B. Claflin Company, complainant and appellant, v. Julius Freudenthal et al., defendants and respondents
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1900-06-18
Citations: 60 N.J. Eq. 483
Docket Number: 
Parties: H. B. Claflin Company, complainant and appellant, v. Julius Freudenthal et al., defendants and respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 60
Pages: 483–484

Head Matter:
H. B. Claflin Company, complainant and appellant, v. Julius Freudenthal et al., defendants and respondents.
[Filed June 18th, 1900.]
On appeal from a decree advised by Vice-Chancellor Emery, whose opinion is reported in 13 Dick. Ch. Rep. 298.
Mr. Beuben M. Hart and Mr. Charles J. Roe, fox the appellant.
Mr. Eugene Stevenson, for the respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons given by Vice-Chancellor Emery in the opinion below.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Ludlow, Collins, Bogert, Hendrickson, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees — 13.
For reversal — Hone.