Case Name: In the Matter of Stanley E. ROBISON, Jr.
Court: Supreme Court of Indiana
Jurisdiction: Indiana
Decision Date: 2006-11-20
Citations: 856 N.E.2d 1202
Docket Number: No. 22S00-0610-DI-361
Parties: In the Matter of Stanley E. ROBISON, Jr.
Judges: All Justices concur.
Reporter: North Eastern Reporter 2d
Volume: 856
Pages: 1202–1203

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Stanley E. ROBISON, Jr.
No. 22S00-0610-DI-361.
Supreme Court of Indiana.
Nov. 20, 2006.

Opinion:
ORDER APPROVING STATEMENT OF CIRCUMSTANCES AND CONDITIONAL AGREEMENT FOR DISCIPLINE
Pursuant to Ind. Admission and Discipline Rule 28, Section 11, the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission and the respondent have submitted for approval a Statement of Circumstances and Conditional Agreement for Discipline stipulating agreed facts and proposed discipline as summarized below:
Facts: Respondent represented the husband in a dissolution of marriage ac tion. The husband and wife had separated in early February 2005, with the wife remaining in the marital residence. On February 14, 2005, respondent filed a dissolution petition along with a motion for a restraining order. The motion was unverified and alleged the residence belong to husband and that wife had a history of destroying property, drinking and verbal abuse. The motion sought wife's removal from the residence. Wife, who was unrepresented by counsel, was not notified of the filing. Further, the motion failed to include a certification of the efforts made to notify the wife, or why notice should not be given. The judge signed the Order and the Sheriff removed the wife from the residence without giving her an opportunity to take her possessions.
Violations: Respondent's conduct violated Ind. Professional Conduct Rule 3.5(b), which prohibits ex parte communication with a judge.
Discipline: Public reprimand.
The Court, having considered the submission of the parties, now APPROVES and ORDERS the agreed discipline. Costs of this proceeding are assessed against the respondent. The Court further finds that with the acceptance of this agreement the hearing officer appointed in this case is discharged.
The Clerk of this Court is directed to forward a copy of this Order to the hearing officer and in accordance with the provisions of Admis.Disc.R. 28, Section 3(d).
All Justices concur.