Case Name: TECHNOGRAPH PRINTED CIRCUITS, LTD., and Technograph Printed Electronics, Incorporated, Appellants, v. BENDIX CORPORATION, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1964-01-17
Citations: 327 F.2d 497
Docket Number: No. 9085
Parties: TECHNOGRAPH PRINTED CIRCUITS, LTD., and Technograph Printed Electronics, Incorporated, Appellants, v. BENDIX CORPORATION, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 327
Pages: 497–498

Head Matter:
TECHNOGRAPH PRINTED CIRCUITS, LTD., and Technograph Printed Electronics, Incorporated, Appellants, v. BENDIX CORPORATION, Appellee.
No. 9085.
United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.
Argued Nov. 4, 1963.
Decided Jan. 17, 1964.
Walter J. Blenko, Pittsburgh, Pa. (John W. Avirett, II, Baltimore, Md., Walter J. Blenko, Jr., Pittsburgh, Pa., M. Victor Leventritt, New York City, Piper & Marbury, Baltimore, Md., and Blenko, Hoopes, Leonard & Buell, Pittsburgh, Pa., on brief), for appellants.
Harold J. Birch and Edward S. Irons, Washington, D. C. (Benjamin C. Howard, Baltimore, Md., William W. Beckett, Hy-attsville, Md., Edward F. McKie, Jr., Washington, D. C., Miles & Stoekbridge, Baltimore, Md., and Irons, Birch, Swin dler & McKie, Washington, D. C., on brief), for appellee.
Before HAYNSWORTH, BOREMAN and BRYAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
After careful consideration of the record, the arguments and the briefs of counsel, we are persuaded that the patent claims are invalid for obviousness in the light of the prior art for the reasons fully discussed in the opinion of the District Court. Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. Bendix Aviation Corp., D.C. Md., 218 F.Supp. 1.
Affirmed.