Case Name: Harvey R. MALONE et ux., Appellants, v. CITIZENS & PEOPLES NATIONAL BANK OF PENSACOLA, etc., Appellee
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1979-11-21
Citations: 377 So. 2d 166
Docket Number: No. 56358
Parties: Harvey R. MALONE et ux., Appellants, v. CITIZENS & PEOPLES NATIONAL BANK OF PENSACOLA, etc., Appellee.
Judges: ENGLAND, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, SUNDBERG, ALDERMAN and McDonald, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 377
Pages: CCXLVI–CCXLVI

Head Matter:
Harvey R. MALONE et ux., Appellants, v. CITIZENS & PEOPLES NATIONAL BANK OF PENSACOLA, etc., Appellee.
No. 56358.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Nov. 21, 1979.
David G. Poucher of the Law Offices of Philip D. Beall, Pensacola, for appellants.
Robert L. Stone of Harrell, Wiltshire, Stone & Swearingen, Pensacola, for appel-lee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We find appellants' constitutional argument to be without merit. See City of New Orleans v. Dukes, 421 U.S. 297, 96 S.Ct. 2513, 49 L.Ed.2d 511 (1976); Katzenbach v. Morgan, 384 U.S. 641, 86 S.Ct. 1717, 16 L.Ed.2d 828 (1966); Williamson v. Lee Optical Co., 348 U.S. 483, 75 S.Ct. 461, 99 L.Ed. 563 (1955); Lasky v. State Farm Insurance Co., 296 So.2d 9 (Fla.1974); Winner v. Westwood, 273 So.2d 151 (Fla.1970); Rodriquez v. Jones, 64 So.2d 278 (Fla.1953). We have also reviewed the other issues raised by appellants and find them to be without merit.
The order of the court below is, therefore, affirmed.
It is so ordered.
ENGLAND, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, SUNDBERG, ALDERMAN and McDonald, JJ., concur.