Case Name: Rafael CIARCIA and Adelina Sciarretta de Ciarcia, Appellants, v. Jorge Añez DAGER and Maria Beatriz Folla de Añez, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2013-04-10
Citations: 126 So. 3d 323
Docket Number: No. 3D12-2565
Parties: Rafael CIARCIA and Adelina Sciarretta de Ciarcia, Appellants, v. Jorge Añez DAGER and Maria Beatriz Folla de Añez, Appellees.
Judges: Before SUAREZ and LOGUE, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 126
Pages: 323–323

Head Matter:
Rafael CIARCIA and Adelina Sciarretta de Ciarcia, Appellants, v. Jorge Añez DAGER and Maria Beatriz Folla de Añez, Appellees.
No. 3D12-2565.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 10, 2013.
Harper Meyer Perez Hagen O’Connor Albert & Dribin LLP, and Patrick J. O’Connor, Miami, for appellants.
Billbrough & Marks, P.A., and Geoffrey B. Marks and Erin C. Hantman, Coral Gables, for appellees.
Before SUAREZ and LOGUE, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Avisto Mortg., LLC, 110 So.3d 99 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) ("At the risk of viewing professional courtesy through rose-colored glasses, we can also recall a day when counsel appearing without opposition for a hearing on an obviously-contested matter . would first place a telephone call to opposing counsel to confirm that some personal emergency or postal glitch had not occurred.").