Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Anthony Szeliga, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1992-10-07
Citations: 186 A.D.2d 1042
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Szeliga, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 186
Pages: 1042–1042

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Szeliga, Appellant.

Opinion:
— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The suppression court correctly concluded that the questioning of defendant by Investigator Clark was noncustodial and that defendant's statement was voluntary (see, People v Centano, 76 NY2d 837, 838). Thus, defendant's statement was properly admitted at trial. (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, DiFlorio, J. — Leaving Scene of Accident.) Present — -Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Boehm and Doerr, JJ.