Case Name: In re the MARRIAGE OF Jean D. BAKER and Robert J. Baker. Jean D. Baker, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Robert J. Baker, Respondent/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-09-23
Citations: 121 S.W.3d 240
Docket Number: Nos. ED 82364, ED 82365
Parties: In re the MARRIAGE OF Jean D. BAKER and Robert J. Baker. Jean D. Baker, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Robert J. Baker, Respondent/Appellant.
Judges: Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 121
Pages: 240–240

Head Matter:
In re the MARRIAGE OF Jean D. BAKER and Robert J. Baker. Jean D. Baker, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Robert J. Baker, Respondent/Appellant.
Nos. ED 82364, ED 82365.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Sept. 23, 2003.
Rehearing Denied Nov. 24, 2003.
Robert J. Baker, Hazelwood, pro se.
Mary Ann Weems, Law Office of Mary Ann Weems, Clayton, for respondent.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Father appeals from the judgment of the trial court awarding wife's attorney's fees on appeal and the dismissal of his motion to quash the garnishment. We consolidated the appeals.
The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).