Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Victor ROMAN, a/k/a Chaparro, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-11-21
Citations: 703 F. App'x 203
Docket Number: No. 17-6898
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Victor ROMAN, a/k/a Chaparro, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. ■
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 703
Pages: 203–204

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Victor ROMAN, a/k/a Chaparro, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 17-6898
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: November 16, 2017
Decided: November 21, 2017
Victor Roman, Appellant Pro Se. Edward D. Gray, Assistant United States Attorney, Laura Howard, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh,’ North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. ■

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Victor Roman appeals the district court's marginal order denying his motion for reconsideration of the district court's previous denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its order denying the § 3582(c)(2) motion, United States v. Roman, No. 7:05-cr-00097-FL-20 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 25, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
While a district court lacks authority to reconsider a ruling on a § 3582(c)(2) motion, "this prohibition [is] non-jurisdictional, and thus waived when the government fail[s] to assert it below." United States v. May, 855 F.3d 271, 274 (4th Cir. 2017). Here, "[b]ecause the government failed to raise this non-jurisdictional limitation below, it is waived on appeal," Id. at 275,