Case Name: WESTERGREEN v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1916-05-03
Citations: 185 S.W. 879
Docket Number: No. 4056
Parties: WESTERGREEN v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 185
Pages: 879–879

Head Matter:
WESTERGREEN v. STATE.
(No. 4056.)
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
May 3, 1916.)
Criminal Law <§=>1097(6) — Appeal—Statement op Facts — Necessity.
Where the only ground for motion for new trial was that the evidence did not sustain the conviction, that matter cannot be reviewed on appeal, where there was no statement of facts presenting the evidence.
[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. § 2947; Dec. Dig. <§=1097(6).]
Appeal from Harris County Court at Law; Clark C. Wren, Judge.
Mrs. E. F. Westergreen was convicted of having in her possession with intent to sell and with offering and exposing for sale meat which was in a filthy, decomposed, and putrid state, and she appeals.
Affirmed.
C. C. McDonald, Asst. A tty. Gen., for the State.

Opinion:
DAVIDSON, J.
The information and complaint charge appellant with having in her possession with intent to sell and with offering and exposing for sale meat which was an article of food consisting in whole and in part of filthy, decomposed, and putrid animal substance. The record is without a statement of facts or charges. The only ground of the motion for new trial is that the judgment is contrary to the law and the evidence in this: That there was no testimony that the meat in question was offered or kept for the purpose of sale, and therefore the evidence did not sustain the conviction. We are unable to pass on this question, for the reasons stated, that the evidence is not before the court.
The judgment will be affirmed.