Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shay Dale LACKEY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-12-17
Citations: 115 F. App'x 260
Docket Number: Nos. 04-50395, 04-50398
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shay Dale LACKEY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 115
Pages: 260–260

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shay Dale LACKEY, Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 04-50395, 04-50398.
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Decided Dec. 17, 2004.
Joseph H. Gay, Jr, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Donna F. Coltharp, Federal Public Defender’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Shay Dale Lackey raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Brown, 920 F.2d 1212, 1216-17 (5th Cir.1991), which held that a district court may order a term of imprisonment to run consecutively with an unimposed state sentence. The Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.