Case Name: Robert J. SCHMITZ, Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-04-18
Citations: 16 S.W.3d 720
Docket Number: No. ED 75942
Parties: Robert J. SCHMITZ, Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Respondent.
Judges: Before: RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 16
Pages: 720–720

Head Matter:
Robert J. SCHMITZ, Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Respondent.
No. ED 75942.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
April 18, 2000.
Robert S. Adler, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Evan J. Buchheim, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before: RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Robert J. Schmitz appeals the judgment of the trial court, after a trial de novo, upholding the Director of Revenue's suspension of his driving privileges pursuant to Section 302.505 RSMo Cum.Supp.1999. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, furnished the parties with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).