Case Name: Arthur THACKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BRADY SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-09-29
Citations: 144 F. App'x 328
Docket Number: No. 05-1385
Parties: Arthur THACKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BRADY SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 144
Pages: 328–329

Head Matter:
Arthur THACKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BRADY SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 05-1385.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 27, 2005.
Decided: Sept. 29, 2005.
Arthur Thacker, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth Ralph Keller, Carruthers & Roth, PA, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Arthur Thacker appeals from the magistrate judge's order dismissing his action alleging employment discrimination. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Thacker v. Brady Servs., Inc., No. CA-03-1160-1 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 2, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).