Case Name: Eddie GAMBLE, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Vernessa CRADDOCK, Defendant-Appellee, and L.T. Wright, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-03-05
Citations: 558 F. App'x 331
Docket Number: No. 13-7735
Parties: Eddie GAMBLE, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Vernessa CRADDOCK, Defendant-Appellee, and L.T. Wright, Defendant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 558
Pages: 331–331

Head Matter:
Eddie GAMBLE, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Vernessa CRADDOCK, Defendant-Appellee, and L.T. Wright, Defendant.
No. 13-7735.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 27, 2014.
Decided: March 5, 2014.
Eddie Gamble, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lockridge, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Butner, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Eddie Gamble, Sr., appeals the district court's orders dismissing without prejudice his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), and denying his motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gamble v. Craddock, No. 5:11-ct-03176-FL, 2013 WL 6244684 (E.D.N.C. May 28, 2013 & Aug. 21, 2013). We deny as moot Gamble's motion to expedite and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.