Case Name: Ethel CLAWANS, Appellant, v. Sarah CARRICK, Trading as the Whalen Shop, and Mary E. Clarke, Individually and as Agent of Said Sarah Carrick, Appellees
Court: United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1932-01-18
Citations: 55 F.2d 1038
Docket Number: No. 5260
Parties: Ethel CLAWANS, Appellant, v. Sarah CARRICK, Trading as the Whalen Shop, and Mary E. Clarke, Individually and as Agent of Said Sarah Carrick, Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 55
Pages: 1038–1038

Head Matter:
Ethel CLAWANS, Appellant, v. Sarah CARRICK, Trading as the Whalen Shop, and Mary E. Clarke, Individually and as Agent of Said Sarah Carrick, Appellees.
No. 5260.
Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.
Argued Dec. 9, 1931.
Decided Jan. 18, 1932.
Petition for Rehearing Denied Feb. 13, 19321.
Benjamin M. Weinberg, of Newark, N. J., for appellant.
W. A. Coombe, Paul B. Cromelin, Bolitha J. Laws, and Francis C. Brooke, all of Washington, D. C., for appellees.
Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and VAN ORSDEL, HITZ, and GRONER, Associate Justices.

Opinion:
HITZ, Associate Justice.
The parties to this appeal are also parties to No. 5259 just decided, 60 App. D. C. 412, 55 F.(2d) 1037; though, in that case there were additional parties.
In this case there is a similar motion, a similar ruling, a similar appeal, and there ara similar questions of amendments and rules.
For purposes of decision, the eases are identical.
The decision in this ease must he the same as in that and for the same reasons.
The judgment is therefore affirmed, with costs.