Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Daniel ALVA-BAENA, also known as Daniel Alva-Bahena, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-12-16
Citations: 587 F. App'x 841
Docket Number: No. 13-41164
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Daniel ALVA-BAENA, also known as Daniel Alva-Bahena, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 587
Pages: 841–842

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Daniel ALVA-BAENA, also known as Daniel Alva-Bahena, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-41164
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 16, 2014.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Michele Renee Villarreal-Kuchta, Law Office of Michele Villarreal-Kuchta, Corpus Christi, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before KING, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Daniel Alva-Baena has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Alva-Baena, who has completed his sentence of imprisonment, has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as frivolous and in part as moot; See 5th CIR. R. 42.2; United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis, 483 F.3d 381, 382-83 (5th Cir.2007).
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.