Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cedrick L. SNIPES, a/k/a Cederick L. Snipes, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-06-06
Citations: 476 F. App'x 530
Docket Number: No. 12-6375
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cedrick L. SNIPES, a/k/a Cederick L. Snipes, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 476
Pages: 530–531

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cedrick L. SNIPES, a/k/a Cederick L. Snipes, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-6375.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 31, 2012.
Decided: June 6, 2012.
Cedrick L. Snipes, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Thomas Phillips, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Cedrick L. Snipes appeals the district court's order denying his motion seeking a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error, given that Snipes is ineligible for the reduction that he seeks. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. United States v. Snipes, No. 2:05-cr-00718-PMD-1 (D.S.C. Feb. 13, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.