Case Name: Griggs v. Day et al.
Court: New York Superior Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1892-05-02
Citations: 19 N.Y.S. 1019
Docket Number: 
Parties: Griggs v. Day et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 19
Pages: 1019–1020

Head Matter:
Griggs v. Day et al.
(Superior Court of New York City,
General Term.
May 2, 1892.)
Appeal from judgment on report of referee.
Action by Clark R. Griggs against Mellville C. Day and another, surviving executors of Cornelius K. Garrison, deceased. From a judgment of a referee both parties appeal.
For former reports, see 11 H. Y. Supp. 885; 12 H. Y. Supp. 958, mem.; 18 H. Y. Supp. 796.
Argued before Sedgwick, C. J., and Freedman and McAdam, JJ.
William B. Bronk, for plaintiff. John H. Post, for defendants.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
At the beginning of the last trial the attorneys of the parties stipulated that the evidence introduced upon the former trial, as printed in the case upon the former appeal, should be the evidence of the parties upon the new trial. By the stipulation, all objections and exceptions to the admission or exclusion of evidence, as the same appeared in' the said case, were waived, and no exceptions to the admission or exclusion of evidence were taken by either party upon the new trial. The evidence thus submitted supports the findings of fact made by the referee, and these findings fully sustain the conclusions of law based by the referee thereon. The referee seems to have given proper effect to the rulings made by the general term of this court on the former appeal, so far as they are applicable, and, upon the whole case, no exception appears on either side which calls for a reversal or modification of the judgment. Upon the appeals of both parties the judgment should be affirmed upon the opinion and supplemental opinion filed by the referee, but without costs to either party.