Case Name: 21st Mortgage Corporation, Appellant, v. Jose Luis Rodriguez-Cardona, Respondent, et al., Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2017-09-27
Citations: 153 A.D.3d 1383
Docket Number: 
Parties: 21st Mortgage Corporation, Appellant, v Jose Luis Rodriguez-Cardona, Respondent, et al., Defendants.
Judges: Chambers, J.P., Miller, Barros and Connolly, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 153
Pages: 1383–1384

Head Matter:
21st Mortgage Corporation, Appellant, v Jose Luis Rodriguez-Cardona, Respondent, et al., Defendants.
[60 NYS3d 697]

Opinion:
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Baily-Schiffman, J.), dated March 13, 2015, as granted the motion of the defendant Jose Luis Rodriguez-Cardona pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against him as time-barred.
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, with costs to the appellant, in light of our decision and order in Option One Mtge. v Rodriguez-Cardona (153 AD3d 1422 [2017] [decided herewith]).
Our reinstatement of the complaint in Option One Mtge. v Rodriguez-Cardona (153 AD3d 1422 [2017] [decided herewith]), along with the substitution of the plaintiff as the named plaintiff therein, renders this appeal academic (see RPAPL 1301 [3]; Aurora Loan Servs., LLC v Reid, 132 AD3d 788 [2015]).
Chambers, J.P., Miller, Barros and Connolly, JJ., concur.