Case Name: Pipat AUKSARAWRONGROT and Pragarmast Auksarawrongrot, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. ST. LOUIS LABOR HEALTH INSTITUTE, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1997-09-09
Citations: 956 S.W.2d 305
Docket Number: No. 71001
Parties: Pipat AUKSARAWRONGROT and Pragarmast Auksarawrongrot, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. ST. LOUIS LABOR HEALTH INSTITUTE, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before AHRENS, P.J., and CRANDALL and KAROHL, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 956
Pages: 305–305

Head Matter:
Pipat AUKSARAWRONGROT and Pragarmast Auksarawrongrot, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. ST. LOUIS LABOR HEALTH INSTITUTE, Defendant/Respondent.
No. 71001.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Sept. 9, 1997.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 30, 1997.
Application to Transfer Denied Dec. 23, 1997.
John A. Walsh Jr., St. Louis, for appellant.
Peter F. Spataro, Gregory T. Mueller, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before AHRENS, P.J., and CRANDALL and KAROHL, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Pipat and Pragarmast Auksarawrongrot ("Parents") appeal from a judgment in favor of St. Louis Labor Health Institute ("Institute") in their wrongful death claim against Institute. On appeal, Parents contend (1) that the instructions submitted to the jury deprived them of their right to due process, and (2) that the court erred in making comments which supplemented or modified the MAI instructions.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).