Case Name: Holeman vs. Maupin
Court: Kentucky Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Kentucky
Decision Date: 1826-10-23
Citations: 3 T.B. Mon. 380
Docket Number: 
Parties: Holeman vs. Maupin.
Judges: 
Reporter: Kentucky Reports
Volume: 19
Pages: 380–381

Head Matter:
Holeman vs. Maupin.
October 23.
Error to the Madison Circuit; George Shannon, Judge,
Vendor and Vendee, Rescission of Contracts.
filANCTBT.
Case 124.
Whore the the convey03 since from andéfecVof other, he cannot after wards enjoin the vendor from collecting the purphase money for title, but must Jo,)k to the ^antor-

Opinion:
Judge Owsley
delivered the Opinion of the Court.
After having accepted from the, Bavnscs a deed fpi»'the land, though it may never bav.e been proved aric* recorded, Maupin can have no equity to enjoin the collection of the money, which, by his contract with lloleman, for the purchase, he stipulated to pay, but to remedy any defects in his title, be should have recourse' to the Barnses. It was, therefore? erroneous to decree a perpetuation of the injunction which had been granted Maupin, against the judg-. ffioiit at law recovered by Holemap, for part of the purchase money, and consequently, the decree must be reversed vvith cost, the cause remanded to the court below, and the bill of Maupin dismissed, with cost and damages.
Mayes and Caperton for plaintiff) Turner for defondant. . ,