Case Name: Rodney SHARP, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-10-16
Citations: 58 S.W.3d 92
Docket Number: No. ED 78701
Parties: Rodney SHARP, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before JAMES R. DOWD, C.J., PAUL J. SIMON, and MARY R. RUSSELL, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 58
Pages: 92–92

Head Matter:
Rodney SHARP, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 78701.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Oct. 16, 2001.
Mary S. Choi, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Susan L. Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before JAMES R. DOWD, C.J., PAUL J. SIMON, and MARY R. RUSSELL, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Rodney Sharp, appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24 .035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. He contends he did not enter his guilty plea knowingly and voluntarily because the trial court denied a paternity test. Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
. All Rule references are to the Missouri Court Rules (2001).