Case Name: Jesse Jewell ODOM, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1971-02-02
Citations: 243 So. 2d 445
Docket Number: No. 70-54
Parties: Jesse Jewell ODOM, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 243
Pages: 445–446

Head Matter:
Jesse Jewell ODOM, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 70-54.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 2, 1971.
Melvyn Kessler, Miami, for appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Alan M. Medof, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The defendant appeals from his judgment of conviction for the crimes of carrying a concealed weapon and bribery.
His argument that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress has been considered and is found to be insufficient. See Guillory v. Wilson, 402 F.2d 34 (9th Cir. 1968); State v. Browning, Fla.App.1970, 233 So.2d 866; and Godbee v. State, Fla.App.1969, 224 So.2d 441.
The argument that the trial court erred in denying the motion of the defendant for a judgment of acquittal on the charge of carrying a concealed weapon is without sufficient merit to warrant reversal. § 790.01, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.
The defendant's final argument for reversal has been considered and a review of the record and briefs convince us that it is insufficient.
The judgment of conviction is
Affirmed.