Case Name: Susie BLAKE, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY and Ladelle Investment Company, Inc., Defendants/Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-11-01
Citations: 175 S.W.3d 189
Docket Number: No. ED 85774
Parties: Susie BLAKE, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY and Ladelle Investment Company, Inc., Defendants/Respondents.
Judges: Before NANNETTE A. BAKER, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 175
Pages: 189–190

Head Matter:
Susie BLAKE, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY and Ladelle Investment Company, Inc., Defendants/Respondents.
No. ED 85774.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Nov. 1, 2005.
Cardina F. Johnson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Marilyn Gail Green, Jefferson City, MO, for Division of Employment Security.
Jonathan Dewitt McKee, St. Louis, MO, for Ladelle Investment, Inc.
Before NANNETTE A. BAKER, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Susie Blake (Appellant) appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) disqualifying Appellant for 10 weeks from unemployment benefits because she was discharged for misconduct connected with work. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the Commission's decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence and is authorized by law. Moore v. Swisher Mower & Machine Co., Inc., 49 S.W.3d 731, 737 (Mo.App. E.D.2001). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).