Case Name: Victor LABANTSCHNIG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KENWORTH OF ST. LOUIS, INC., and J.W. Ackerman, Defendants-Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1997-05-27
Citations: 945 S.W.2d 699
Docket Number: No. 71030
Parties: Victor LABANTSCHNIG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KENWORTH OF ST. LOUIS, INC., and J.W. Ackerman, Defendants-Respondents.
Judges: Before CRAHAN, P.J., and GRIMM and HOFF, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 945
Pages: 699–699

Head Matter:
Victor LABANTSCHNIG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KENWORTH OF ST. LOUIS, INC., and J.W. Ackerman, Defendants-Respondents.
No. 71030.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
May 27, 1997.
Marvin Klamen, Clayton, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Bernard A. Reinert, Thomas J. Burnside, St. Louis, for Defendants-Respondents.
Before CRAHAN, P.J., and GRIMM and HOFF, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Victor Labantschnig appeals from a judgment dismissing his libel and invasion of privacy claims against Kenworth of St. Louis, Inc. and J.W. Ackerman (both referred to as respondents) upon the granting of respondents' motion to dismiss. That judgment resolved all of Labantschnig's claims against respondents.
No error of law appears in the judgment. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential or jurisprudential value. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
. After the trial court entered judgment on La-bantschnig's claims against respondents, the only remaining defendant, Earle J. Niederluecke, filed a motion for clarification and to dismiss. In December 1996, the trial judge granted that motion and clarified the earlier dismissal applied to all parties "such that the entire case is final for appeal purposes."