Case Name: Jose Ramon Ortiz, Respondent, v. AGL Trucking Corp. et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2015-07-01
Citations: 130 A.D.3d 592
Docket Number: 
Parties: Jose Ramon Ortiz, Respondent, v AGL Trucking Corp. et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 130
Pages: 592–592

Head Matter:
Jose Ramon Ortiz, Respondent, v AGL Trucking Corp. et al., Appellants.
[10 NYS3d 897]

Opinion:
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kangs County (King, J.), dated January 7, 2014, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff alleged that while he was riding his bicycle, he was struck by a truck that was owned by the defendant AGL Trucking Corp. and operated by the defendant Park Fwan Wong.
In support of their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, the defendants submitted evidence which included the transcripts of the deposition testimony of the plaintiff and the defendant Park Fwan Wong, as well as the affidavit of that defendant. These submissions failed to eliminate all triable issues of fact as to whether Park Fwan Wong was negligent in violating Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1146 and 1122-a, and whether such negligence was a proximate cause of the accident (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). Since the defendants failed to establish their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, we need not consider the sufficiency of the plaintiffs opposition papers (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]).
Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Dillon, J.P., Leventhal, Cohen and Maltese, JJ., concur.