Case Name: In the Matter of Harry Steadman, Petitioner, v. Donald Selsky, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2004-05-17
Citations: 7 A.D.3d 721
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Harry Steadman, Petitioner, v Donald Selsky, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 7
Pages: 721–721

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Harry Steadman, Petitioner, v Donald Selsky, Respondent.
[776 NYS2d 839]

Opinion:
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent, dated July 29, 2002, which confirmed a determination of a hearing officer, dated June 11, 2002, made after a Tier III disciplinary hearing, finding that the petitioner violated three sections of the standards of inmate behavior and imposing penalties.
Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the petitioner's contention, he was not denied adequate employee assistance (see Matter of Greene v Coombe, 242 AD2d 796, 797 [1997]; Matter of Clavijo v Coombe, 236 AD2d 692 [1997]).
There is substantial evidence in the record to support the challenged determination (see Matter of Kalish v Keane, 256 AD2d 343, 344 [1998]).
The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.P., Smith, H. Miller and Goldstein, JJ., concur.