Case Name: Ex Parte Lucian Hunter
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1895-02-06
Citations: 34 Tex. Crim. 114
Docket Number: No. 698
Parties: Ex Parte Lucian Hunter.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Criminal Reports
Volume: 34
Pages: 114–115

Head Matter:
Ex Parte Lucian Hunter.
No. 698.
Decided February 6.
Public Weighers—Construction of Statute.—The Act of April 19, 1879 (Will-on’s Criminal Statutes, articles P. C. 478a, 478b), as amended by Act of April 12, 1883. (General Laws Eighteenth Legislature, p. 84), permits any person to weigh cotton, wool, or hides when requested to do so by the owner, notwithstanding there may be a public weigher in the city or town where the same is weighed.
Appeal from the County Court of Grayson. Tried below before Hon. E. P. Gregg, County Judge.
The opinion states the case.
O. B. Stuart, for relator, filed an able argument in the case.
Mann Trice, Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

Opinion:
HENDERSON, Judge.
The appellant was arrested by the marshal of Whitesboro on a complaint charging him with unlawfully weighing a bale of cotton, and receiving the fees therefor; it being charged in said complaint that said bale of cotton had been sold, and that Whitesboro had a public weigher, who was authorized and required to weigh said bale of cotton. On his arrest he sued out a writ of habeas corpus, and was brought before the county judge, who, after hearing the case, remanded him to the custody of the officer, from which judgment he appeals to this court.
The appellant contends, (1) that the act under which he was arrested was unconstitutional; (2) that, if constitutional, it had been so amended as to permit private persons to weigh cotton in cities containing a public weigher.
The law of 1879, creating public weighers, was amended by the Act of the Legislature in 1883. Acts 18th Leg., 1883, p. 84. This last act, by its provisions, permits any person to weigh cotton, wool, or hides when requested to do so by the owner or owners thereof. The record in this case shows, that the relator was requested by the owner of said bale of cotton to weigh same, and that the request was in writing. In our view, the law as amended authorized the relator to weigh the bale of cotton for which he was arrested, and it is unnecessary to decide the constitutional question presented.
The judgment of the lower court is reversed, ordered discharged. and the relator is
Reversed, and relator discharged.
Judges all present and concurring.