Case Name: In re Boyce Allen BRASINGTON, Debtor. Stanley Shapiro; Dyan Brasington, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Boyce Allen Brasington, Defendant-Appellant, and Kim Y. Johnson, Trustee, Trustee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-09-23
Citations: 46 F. App'x 198
Docket Number: No. 02-1394
Parties: In re Boyce Allen BRASINGTON, Debtor. Stanley Shapiro; Dyan Brasington, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Boyce Allen Brasington, Defendant-Appellant, and Kim Y. Johnson, Trustee, Trustee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 46
Pages: 198–198

Head Matter:
In re Boyce Allen BRASINGTON, Debtor. Stanley Shapiro; Dyan Brasington, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Boyce Allen Brasington, Defendant-Appellant, and Kim Y. Johnson, Trustee, Trustee.
No. 02-1394.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 30, 2002.
Decided Sept. 23, 2002.
J. Marcus Slowiak, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellant. Stanley Shapiro, Dyan Brasington, Appellees Pro Se.
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Boyce Allen Brasington appeals from the district court's order affirming the bankruptcy court's order determining that a marital debt was not dischargeable in his bankruptcy proceeding. Our review of the record and the opinions below discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Brasington v. Shapiro, 274 B.R. 159 (D.Md.2002). The Appellees' motions for summary affirmanee/dismissal, for sanctions, and to impose an appeal bond are hereby denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.