Case Name: Daniel L. FAUGHT, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1976-07-28
Citations: 539 S.W.2d 750
Docket Number: No. 10174
Parties: Daniel L. FAUGHT, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: All concur.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 539
Pages: 750–751

Head Matter:
Daniel L. FAUGHT, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 10174.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Springfield District.
July 28, 1976.
Devon F. Sherwood, Sherwood & Bruer, Springfield, for movant-appellant.
John C. Danforth, Atty. Gen., Preston Dean, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Daniel Lee Faught was jury-convicted of first degree murder in the Circuit Court of Greene County. On June 25, 1975, he appealed from that conviction and that appeal is now pending in this Court in Case No. 10,068. Before the transcript on appeal was filed in Case No. 10,068, Faught filed in the Circuit Court of Greene County what he denominated as a "Petition for Writ of Ha-beas Corpus," but which in truth was a motion in the nature of a Rule 27.26 V.A. M.R. proceeding to vacate the judgment and sentence in Case No. 10,068. Following an evidentiary hearing, the Circuit Court of Greene County denied relief and this appeal followed.
Rule 27.26(b)(2) provides: "A motion to vacate, set aside or correct a sentence cannot be maintained while an appeal from the conviction and sentence is pending or during the time within which an appeal may be perfected." Because, as above noted, Faught has pending in this Court a direct appeal from the conviction he seeks to attack by his petition-motion under Rule 27.-26, he cannot invoke postconviction remedies until his direct appeal is determined. Maupin v. State, 536 S.W.2d 507 (Mo.App.1976); Gibson v. State, 536 S.W.2d 506 (Mo.App.1976).
The appeal is dismissed.
All concur.