Case Name: HARRIS v. CALIFORNIA et al.
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1963-06-17
Citations: 374 U.S. 499
Docket Number: No. 135, Misc.
Parties: HARRIS v. CALIFORNIA et al.
Judges: Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U. S., at 358, 360.
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 374
Pages: 499–499

Head Matter:
HARRIS v. CALIFORNIA et al.
No. 135, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1963.
Petitioner pro se.
Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, and William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, for' respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353.
Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U. S., at 358, 360.