Case Name: Terrance W. DOUGHERTY, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. CITY OF CLAYTON, Missouri, a municipal corporation, et al., Defendants/Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-03-21
Citations: 14 S.W.3d 663
Docket Number: No. ED 76424
Parties: Terrance W. DOUGHERTY, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. CITY OF CLAYTON, Missouri, a municipal corporation, et al., Defendants/Respondents.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J. and PAUL J. SIMON and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 14
Pages: 663–663

Head Matter:
Terrance W. DOUGHERTY, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. CITY OF CLAYTON, Missouri, a municipal corporation, et al., Defendants/Respondents.
No. ED 76424.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
March 21, 2000.
Timothy J. Tryniecki, Thomas B. Weaver, Armstrong Teasdale LLP, St. Louis, for appellant.
Helmut Starr, Lisa S. Leary, Deborah Potter Wilkins, Joseph Vincent Keady, Jr., Cynthia Ann Sciuto, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J. and PAUL J. SIMON and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellants, citizens of the City of Clayton, appeal a judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County upholding the Clayton Board of Alderman's grant of a conditional use permit to Fontbonne College for the construction of a parking lot.
We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties and find no error of law. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value or jurisprudential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b)