Case Name: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. LEWISTON ORCHARDS IRRIGATION DISTRICT, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1972-12-14
Citations: 469 F.2d 698
Docket Number: No. 71-2615
Parties: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. LEWISTON ORCHARDS IRRIGATION DISTRICT, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 469
Pages: 698–698

Head Matter:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. LEWISTON ORCHARDS IRRIGATION DISTRICT, Respondent.
No. 71-2615.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Dec. 14, 1972.
Leonard M. Wagman, Atty. (argued), Kenneth Pearlman, Atty., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Washington, D. C., Charles M. Henderson, Director, Region 19, NLRB, Seattle, Wash., Abraham Sie-gel, Director, Region 31, NLRB, Los An-geles, Cal., for petitioner.
Eugene R. Nielson (argued), Seattle, Wash., Thomas W. Feeny, of Blake, Feeny & Mosman, Lewiston, Idaho, George Davies, Seattle, Wash., for respondent.
Before CHAMBERS, DUNIWAY and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Enforcement of the order of the Board against the Lewiston District is denied for jurisdictional reasons.
Our reading of NLRB v. Natural Gas Utility District of Hawkins County, 402 U.S. 600, 91 S.Ct. 1746, 29 L.Ed.2d 206 (1971), and our examination of the facts brings us to the conclusion that the respondent is entitled to the political subdivision exemption under Section 2(2), 29 U.S.C. § 152(2) of the act.