Case Name: Cebie Woodrow Hughes v. State
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1955-02-16
Citations: 161 Tex. Crim. 300
Docket Number: No. 27,430
Parties: Cebie Woodrow Hughes v. State
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Criminal Reports
Volume: 161
Pages: 300–302

Head Matter:
Cebie Woodrow Hughes v. State
No. 27,430.
February 16, 1955
Motion for Rehearing Denied March 30, 1955
Ben F. Mooring, Paris, for appellant.
Leon Douglas, State’s Attorney, Austin, for the state.

Opinion:
DICE, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of unlawfully driving a motor vehicle upon a public highway while intoxicated, and his punishment was assessed at three days in jail and a fine of fifty dollars.
The statement of facts appearing in the record is not shown to have been filed with the clerk of the trial court as required by Article 759a, section 4, Vernon's Ann. C.C.P., and therefore cannot be considered as a part of the record on appeal. Williams v. State, 264 S.W. 2d 112.
In the absence of a statement of facts, this court cannot pass upon the appellant's contention that the evidence is insuffióient to support the conviction, Shaddix v. State, 90 Texas Cr. R. 431, 235 S.W. 602; Lewis v. State, 243 S.W. 2d 706; and like wise, cannot appraise the exceptions to the court's charge, the refusal of a requested charge or the bills of exception complaining of the introduction in evidence of certain testimony. Smith v. State, 144 Texas Cr. R. 172, 161 S.W. 2d 795; Whistler v. State, 244 S.W. 2d 818, and Conde v. State, 252 S.W. 2d 195.
The complaint and information, as well as all other matters of procedure, appear regular; therefore, nothing is presented for review.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Opinion approved by the Court.