Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose LOPEZ-SOLIS, also known as Jose Luis Lopez, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-10-15
Citations: 398 F. App'x 67
Docket Number: No. 09-50882
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose LOPEZ-SOLIS, also known as Jose Luis Lopez, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before REAVLEY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 398
Pages: 67–67

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose LOPEZ-SOLIS, also known as Jose Luis Lopez, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-50882
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Oct. 15, 2010.
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Richard E. Mattersdorff, El Paso, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before REAVLEY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Jose Lopez-Solis pleaded guilty to illegal reentry after deportation and was sentenced to 24 months of imprisonment and 3 years of supervised release. This court vacated the sentence and remanded the matter for resentencing. United States v. Lopez-Solis, 330 FedAppx. 497 (5th Cir. 2009). Lopez-Solis was released from prison on August 21, 2009, and was deported on August 22, 2009. On September 16, 2009, the district court sentenced him in absentia, over defense counsel's objections, to 21 months of imprisonment and 3 years of supervised release.
On appeal, Lopez-Solis's counsel argues that the district court erred in sentencing Lopez-Solis in absentia. The Government concedes that the in-absentia sentencing was error but argues that the appeal is moot because there is no relief that the court is able to grant to Lopez-Solis. Lopez-Solis's counsel seeks to have the erroneous sentence vacated, but such an action necessarily includes a remand for a correct sentencing. We cannot grant what counsel requests because resentencing would require Lopez-Solis to be present at a hearing to consider a new sentence and his deportation bars such an appearance. See United States v. Rosenbawmr-Alanis, 483 F.3d 381, 383 (5th Cir.2007). Notwithstanding the conceded error in the inabsentia proceeding, the appeal of Lopez-Solis's sentence is moot.
The appeal is DISMISSED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.