Case Name: In re Appeal of DECISION OF the DISCIPLINARY BOARD NO. 06-PDB-062
Court: Louisiana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 2007-08-24
Citations: 962 So. 2d 1075
Docket Number: No. 2007-OB-0491
Parties: In re Appeal of DECISION OF the DISCIPLINARY BOARD NO. 06-PDB-062.
Judges: 
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 962
Pages: 1075–1075

Head Matter:
In re Appeal of DECISION OF the DISCIPLINARY BOARD NO. 06-PDB-062.
No. 2007-OB-0491.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Aug. 24, 2007.

Opinion:
ORDER
On the showing made, we are unable to determine whether the disciplinary board acted arbitrarily, capriciously or unreasonably in dismissing the complaint. Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 30(C). However, given the allegations made by the complainant, we believe the disciplinary board erred in not directing that the matter be investigated further pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 30(A). Accordingly, this matter is remanded to the Office of Disciplinary Counsel to conduct further investigation pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 11(B). In its investigation, the Office of Disciplinary Counsel should review the medical records provided by complainant, as well as any other relevant evidence, before making a determination on the merits of the complaint.
/s/ Pascal F. Calogero, Jr. Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana