Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antwan SMITH, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-03-28
Citations: 683 F. App'x 811
Docket Number: No. 16-17620 Non-Argument Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antwan SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILSON, MARTIN, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 683
Pages: 811–812

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antwan SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-17620 Non-Argument Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
(March 28, 2017)
Nicole D. Mariani, Wifredo A. Ferrer, Tonya R. Long, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Sharad Anand Motiani, Emily M. Sma-chetti, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Ian McDonald, Michael Caruso, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Miami, FL, for Defendant-Appellant
Before WILSON, MARTIN, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Antwan Smith served 70 months of imprisonment for possessing a firearm and ammunition after a felony conviction, and possessing heroin. His sentence included a three-year term of supervised release. Although he violated his supervised release by testing positive for use of controlled substances several times, the Court demonstrated leniency by sentencing him to time-served and warning him that it was his last chance. Smith disregarded that warning and violated his supervised release again by driving with a suspended license, failing to timely notify his probation officer about two arrests, and falling to attend all of his required treatment programs. He appeals the 11-month within-guideline sentence that he received for this second violation, arguing that it is substantively unreasonable. Smith's sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the totality of the circumstances. It is not "outside the range of reasonable sentences dictated by the facts in the case." United States v. Irey, 612 F.3d 1160, 1190 (11th Cir. 2010) (en banc) (internal quotation marks omitted).
AFFIRMED.