Case Name: Stefan RODGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer PERKINS; Timothy P. Doss, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-06-08
Citations: 574 F. App'x 271
Docket Number: No. 14-6080
Parties: Stefan RODGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer PERKINS; Timothy P. Doss, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 574
Pages: 271–271

Head Matter:
Stefan RODGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer PERKINS; Timothy P. Doss, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 14-6080.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 29, 2014.
Decided: June 8, 2014.
Stefan Rodgers, Appellant Pro Se.
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Stefan Rodgers appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rodgers v. Perkins, No. 1:13-cv-00987-GBL-JFA (E.D.Va. Dec. 19, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.