Case Name: Josephine R. PARRISH, Appellant, v. Clyde C. PARRISH, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1980-10-21
Citations: 389 So. 2d 8
Docket Number: No. 79-2071
Parties: Josephine R. PARRISH, Appellant, v. Clyde C. PARRISH, Appellee.
Judges: Before HUBBART, C. J., and NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 389
Pages: 8–8

Head Matter:
Josephine R. PARRISH, Appellant, v. Clyde C. PARRISH, Appellee.
No. 79-2071.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 21, 1980.
Nachwaiter, Christie & Falk, Jay M. Levy, Miami, for appellant.
Jack P. Attias, Key Biscayne, for appel-lee.
Before HUBBART, C. J., and NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellant's motion to adopt the order of the trial court recommending a new trial in this cause upon its finding that an essential part of the appellate record cannot be reconstructed on this appeal is granted, the judgment under review is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to order a new trial in this cause. Van Scoyoc v. York, 173 So.2d 483 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 179 So.2d 214 (Fla.1965).
Reversed and remanded.