Case Name: Bridgman vs. Gregory & Bloodgood
Court: New York Supreme Court of Judicature
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1837-08
Citations: 19 Wend. 9
Docket Number: 
Parties: Bridgman vs. Gregory & Bloodgood.
Judges: 
Reporter: Wendell's Reports
Volume: 19
Pages: 9–9

Head Matter:
Bridgman vs. Gregory & Bloodgood.
An order for a bill of particulars is duly served by delivering a copy; the ‘ original need not be shown.
The question here was, whether the original order for a August, 1837. bill of particulars must be shown to the party called on for the bill, or whether service of a copy is sufficient.

Opinion:
By the Court, Nelson, Ch. J.
All orders which do not-require personal service, may be served by copy. See 1 Archb. Pr. 23. So also it was held by this court in The Utica Bank v. Kibby, 7 Cowen, 148.