Case Name: Schultz & Son, Inc., Respondent, v. Nels H. Nelson, Defendant, and Selma Stille, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1930-09
Citations: 230 A.D. 792
Docket Number: 
Parties: Schultz & Son, Inc., Respondent, v. Nels H. Nelson, Defendant, and Selma Stille, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 230
Pages: 792–792

Head Matter:
Schultz & Son, Inc., Respondent, v. Nels H. Nelson, Defendant, and Selma Stille, Appellant.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Rich, Young, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents and votes for reversal upon the ground that appellant owed the purchaser no duty out of which the purchaser is entitled to damages. To the claim that appellant agreed to convey if the time of the closing of title were adjourned, the Statute of Frauds is a good defense.