Case Name: HARTMAN v. KAHN-FEINBERG CO.
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1906-11-14
Citations: 101 N.Y.S. 108
Docket Number: 
Parties: HARTMAN v. KAHN-FEINBERG CO.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 101
Pages: 108–108

Head Matter:
HARTMAN v. KAHN-FEINBERG CO.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
November 14, 1906.)
Appeal—Returning Record fob Cobbeotion.
The record will be returned to the trial court for correction; the notice of appeal stating that plaintiff appeals from a judgment for costs against him, and the record showing a decision in plaintiff’s favor for damages and costs.
[Ed. Note.—For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 3, Appeal and Error,. §§ 2830-2833.]
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, First District. Action by David Hartman against the Kahn-Feinberg Company. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Record returned for correction.
Argued before GILDERSLEEVE, DUGRO, and DOWLING, JJ.
Edward Fillmore, for appellant.
Julius Silverman, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The notice of appeal states that plaintiff appeals from a judgment against him in favor of defendant for $15 costs, whereas the record shows a decision in plaintiff's favor against defendant for $17.73 damages and costs.
There is clearly an error, and the record must be returned to the court below for correction.