Case Name: AKERS v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1923-02-28
Citations: 251 S.W. 228
Docket Number: No. 7496
Parties: AKERS v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 251
Pages: 228–228

Head Matter:
AKERS v. STATE.
(No. 7496.)
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Feb. 28, 1923.
Rehearing Denied May 23, 1923.)
On Motion for Rehearing.
Criminal law <&wkey;l077 — Affidavit of inability to pay costs of appeal must have been filed in trial court to warrant certiorari by Court of Criminal Appeals.
Where, on motion for rehearing, after af-firmance of a conviction for robbery, the appellant applied for a writ of certiorari to require the court stenographer to prepare and forward a statement of facts and appended to his motion a copy of an affidavit of his inability to pay the costs of appeal, such motion must be denied, where it was not made to appear that the affidavit was presented to the trial court as required by Vernon’s Ann. Code Cr. Proc. 1916, art. 845a.
Appeal from Criminal District Court, Dallas County; C. A. Pippen, Judge.
Otis Akers was convicted of robbery, and he appeals.
Affirmed, and application for certiorari denied.
Otis Akers, in pro. per.
R. G. Storey, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Opinion:
MORROW, P..J.
The offense is robbery; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of seven years.
The indictment is regular; no facts are brought up for review, and no rulings of the trial court are brought forward for revision by bill of exceptions.
The judgment is affirmed.
i&wkey;For other oases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes