Case Name: Mary Elizabeth RENDE, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. Richard Joseph RENDE, Appellant/Cross-Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1994-11-01
Citations: 887 S.W.2d 739
Docket Number: Nos. 64387, 64388
Parties: Mary Elizabeth RENDE, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. Richard Joseph RENDE, Appellant/Cross-Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANE, P.J., and KAROHL and CRAHAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 887
Pages: 739–740

Head Matter:
Mary Elizabeth RENDE, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. Richard Joseph RENDE, Appellant/Cross-Respondent.
Nos. 64387, 64388.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Nov. 1, 1994.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Dec. 8, 1994.
Mark Howard Kruger, Randall B. Kahn, Clayton, for appellant.
Allan F. Stewart, Clayton, Stephen M. Hereford, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before CRANE, P.J., and KAROHL and CRAHAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal and a cross-appeal from an order of the trial court modifying maintenance. We have reviewed the record and the briefs filed by the parties and find the circuit court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prec-edential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).