Case Name: In the Interest of A.L.H., a minor. K.E. and H.E., Petitioners/Respondents, v. A.H., Respondent/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1997-12-23
Citations: 958 S.W.2d 83
Docket Number: No. 71956
Parties: In the Interest of A.L.H., a minor. K.E. and H.E., Petitioners/Respondents, v. A.H., Respondent/Appellant.
Judges: Before CRANE, P.J., and RHODES RUSSELL and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 958
Pages: 83–83

Head Matter:
In the Interest of A.L.H., a minor. K.E. and H.E., Petitioners/Respondents, v. A.H., Respondent/Appellant.
No. 71956.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Dec. 23, 1997.
Robert Keith Bennett, Bridgeton, for appellant.
John R. Bird, Jeff Childress, St. Louis, for respondent.
Phillip E. Jones, Sr., Sharon Thames, St. Louis, for Guardian Ad Litem.
Before CRANE, P.J., and RHODES RUSSELL and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Mother appeals from the trial court's judgment terminating her parental rights. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).