Case Name: Richard Alan HOFF, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1985-04-12
Citations: 466 So. 2d 1252
Docket Number: No. 84-589
Parties: Richard Alan HOFF, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: RYDER, C.J., and GRIMES and LE-HAN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 466
Pages: 1252–1253

Head Matter:
Richard Alan HOFF, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 84-589.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
April 12, 1985.
Dennis J. Rehak, Fort Myers, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and William E. Taylor, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this appeal appellant attacks the court's refusal to suppress the seizure of cocaine found in his possession. However, we dismiss the appeal because appellant failed to show that upon his plea of nolo contendere he reserved the right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress. Skinner v. State, 399 So.2d 1064 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).
In passing we note that the minutes of the criminal court book show that the court withheld adjudication of appellant and sentenced him to probation. The court issued an order withholding adjudication, but also issued a judgment and sentence adjudicating appellant guilty. Therefore, this dismissal is without prejudice to appellant's filing a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) seeking to have the judgment and sentence conformed to the disposition which the judge pronounced in open court. See Yates v. State, 429 So.2d 815 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983).
RYDER, C.J., and GRIMES and LE-HAN, JJ., concur.