Case Name: STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Russell CARINO, and David Rushing, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-03-10
Citations: 625 So. 2d 1215
Docket Number: No. 92-0469
Parties: STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Russell CARINO, and David Rushing, Appellees.
Judges: GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and ANSTEAD and HERSEY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 625
Pages: 1215–1215

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Russell CARINO, and David Rushing, Appellees.
No. 92-0469.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
March 10, 1993.
Opinion Granting Certification of Question June 9, 1993.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Melynda L. Melear, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Rhonda L. Rogers, Rhonda L. Rogers, P.A., Hollywood, for appellee Carino.
Richard L. Rosenbaum, Law Offices of Richard L. Rosenbaum, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee Rushing.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Having accepted jurisdiction pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.160, this court reverses the suppression order that was presented in this appeal for review, and remands the case to the trial court. See State v. Rochelle, 609 So.2d 613 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).
GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and ANSTEAD and HERSEY, JJ., concur.
ON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION
We grant the motion and certify as questions of great public importance those certified in State v. Nevadomski, 619 So.2d 310 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993).
GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and ANSTEAD, J., concur.
HERSEY, J., dissents without opinion.