Case Name: Selwyn BROADNAX-BEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jon GALLEY, Warden, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-09-27
Citations: 46 F. App'x 723
Docket Number: No. 02-6794
Parties: Selwyn BROADNAX-BEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jon GALLEY, Warden, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 46
Pages: 723–724

Head Matter:
Selwyn BROADNAX-BEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jon GALLEY, Warden, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 02-6794.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 19, 2002.
Decided Sept. 27, 2002.
Selwyn Broadnax Bey, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Selwyn Broadnax-Bey seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and conclude on the reasoning of the district court that Broadnax Bey has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Broadnax v. Galley, No. CA-02-949-S (D.Md. May 6, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.