Case Name: Bryan K. GORDON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2013-05-03
Citations: 112 So. 3d 126
Docket Number: No. 5D12-4341
Parties: Bryan K. GORDON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: PALMER, TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 112
Pages: 126–126

Head Matter:
Bryan K. GORDON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D12-4341.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
May 3, 2013.
Bryan K. Gordon, Lake City, pro se.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant challenges the denial of his rule 3.800(a) motion to correct sentence. We affirm in all respects, except Appellant's claim that the sentences on counts one and four should be concurrent, rather than consecutive. As the State acknowledges, these two counts arose from the same criminal episode; consequently, the minimum mandatory sentences on these counts should run concurrently. Palmer v. State, 438 So.2d 1 (Fla.1983). On remand, the trial court shall correct the judgment to reflect that the sentences on these counts shall be served concurrently. Appellant need not be present.
AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.
PALMER, TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.