Case Name: CITY OF KINLOCH, Missouri, Appellant, v. Keith CONWAY, et al., Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2017-07-18
Citations: 522 S.W.3d 913
Docket Number: No. ED 104790
Parties: CITY OF KINLOCH, Missouri, Appellant, v. Keith CONWAY, et al., Respondents.
Judges: Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Colleen Dolan, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 522
Pages: 913–913

Head Matter:
CITY OF KINLOCH, Missouri, Appellant, v. Keith CONWAY, et al., Respondents.
No. ED 104790
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Filed: July 18, 2017
Celestine Dotson, 300 N. Tucker Ste. 301, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Defendants/Respondents Conway and Conway-Buford.
Felica Ezell Gillespie, 6101 Delmar Ste. A 2nd Floor, St. Louis, MO 63112, For Defendant/Respondent McCray.
Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Colleen Dolan, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
City of Kinloch ( the City) appeals the order and judgment of the trial court finding against it on its request to set aside conveyances of real, property owned by Appellant to Betty McCray, Kena Buford, and Derek Conway (together with Keith Conway, "Defendants"). Appellant alleges these three conveyances were;made in violation of § 432.070 and other Missouri statutes and therefore void. We affirm the judgment of the trial court finding the court did not erroneously declare or apply the law in holding that the deeds should not be . set aside under § 432.070 or § 105.452. The court was not asked to make findings of fact and we presume all factual issues were resolved in accordance with the result reached. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).