Case Name: William FORDYCE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2010-04-18
Citations: 307 S.W.3d 229
Docket Number: No. WD 69357
Parties: William FORDYCE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Division Two: JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Presiding Judge, VICTOR C. HOWARD, Judge and JAMES E. WELSH, Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 307
Pages: 229–229

Head Matter:
William FORDYCE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 69357.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
April 18, 2010.
Frederick J. Ernst, for Appellant.
Mary H. Moore, for Respondent.
Before Division Two: JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Presiding Judge, VICTOR C. HOWARD, Judge and JAMES E. WELSH, Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
William Fordyce appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).