Case Name: Robert BROOM, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2011-05-17
Citations: 341 S.W.3d 749
Docket Number: No. ED 94831
Parties: Robert BROOM, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 341
Pages: 749–750

Head Matter:
Robert BROOM, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 94831.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
May 17, 2011.
Scott Thompson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Richard A. Starnes, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Robert Broom ("Movant") appeals from the judgment of the motion court that denied his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15 after an evidentiary hearing. Movant contends that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion for post-conviction relief.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).