Case Name: CITY OF NEWARK, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. NORTH JERSEY DISTRICT WATER SUPPLY COMMISSION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1969-06-06
Citations: 54 N.J. 258
Docket Number: 
Parties: CITY OF NEWARK, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. NORTH JERSEY DISTRICT WATER SUPPLY COMMISSION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 54
Pages: 258–258

Head Matter:
CITY OF NEWARK, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. NORTH JERSEY DISTRICT WATER SUPPLY COMMISSION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Argued June 3, 1969
Decided June 6, 1969.
Mr. Sam Weiss argued the cause for appellant {Mr. Philip E. Gordon, attorney).
Mr. Oscar B. Wilenslcy argued the cause for respondents {Mr. Harvey Bliclcsilver, on the brief).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Mintz in the Chancery Division, 106 N. J. Super. 88.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weinxeaub and Justices Jacobs, Feancis, Peoctoe, Hall, Sohettino and HaneMAN - 7.
For reversal — Hone.