Case Name: Doris N. ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-07-02
Citations: 328 F. App'x 176
Docket Number: No. 08-2291
Parties: Doris N. ANDERSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 328
Pages: 176–176

Head Matter:
Doris N. ANDERSON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 08-2291.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 23, 2009.
Decided: July 2, 2009.
Doris N. Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. John James Doyle, Jr., Constangy, Brooks & Smith, LLC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Doris N. Anderson appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to the Defendant in her civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Anderson v. Duke Energy Corp., No. 3:06-cv-00399-MR-DCK, 2008 WL 4596238 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.