Case Name: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. JOSEPH LINARDUCCI, Jr., PLAINTIFF IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1939-09-22
Citations: 123 N.J.L. 228
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. JOSEPH LINARDUCCI, Jr., PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 123
Pages: 228–228

Head Matter:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. JOSEPH LINARDUCCI, Jr., PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Argued May 17, 1939
Decided September 22, 1939.
For the plaintiff in error, J. Henry Harrison and Samuel I. Kessler.
For the state, William A. Wachenfeld and Anthony M. Hauck, Jr.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Case, Donges, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 12.
For reversal — Hone.