Case Name: Ronald Lee SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1971-10-26
Citations: 253 So. 2d 454
Docket Number: No. 71-407
Parties: Ronald Lee SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: WALDEN, CROSS and OWEN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 253
Pages: 454–454

Head Matter:
Ronald Lee SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 71-407.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Oct. 26, 1971.
Ronald Lee Scott, in pro. per.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles W. Musgrove, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have carefully examined the briefs and record-on-appeal in this case, oral argument having been waived. We find no reversible error.
In particular, we do not find the out-of-court photographic identification of defendant by the victim to be violative of the due process standards set forth in Simmons v. United States, 1968, 390 U.S. 377, 88 S.Ct. 967, 19 L.Ed.2d 1247. See also Jenkins v. State, Fla.App.1969, 228 So.2d 114.
The decision appealed from is, therefore, affirmed.
Affirmed.
WALDEN, CROSS and OWEN, JJ., concur.