Case Name: In the Matter of Betty Howard, Appellant, v. George K. Wyman, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1976-02-12
Citations: 38 N.Y.2d 880
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Betty Howard, Appellant, v George K. Wyman, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 38
Pages: 880–881

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Betty Howard, Appellant, v George K. Wyman, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, et al., Respondents.
Argued January 12, 1976;
decided February 12, 1976
Robert L. Begleiter and Thomas N. Rothschild for appellant.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Thomas R. MeLoughlin and Samuel A. Hirshowitz of counsel), for George K. Wyman, Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, respondent.
W. Bernard Richland, Corporation Counsel (Ellen Kramer Sawyer and L. Kevin Sheridan of counsel), for Jule Sugarman, Commissioner of the New York City Department of Social Services, respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The contention is made that petitioner, a recipient of public assistance under the Aid to Families With Dependent Children program, is now entitled to an emergency allowance, pursuant to section 350-j of the Social Services Law, for replacement of items lost as the result of a burglary in 1969. Upon a fair hearing, evidence was presented that following the burglary, petitioner was provided with living quarters in a hotel and that clothing and certain furniture were supplied to her. Moreover, since February, 1971, petitioner has been living in a new six-room apartment. The determination denying further replacement of the items relating to the 1969 loss was affirmed by Special Term whose judgment was unanimously affirmed by the Appellate Division.
Upon this background and the evidence produced at the fair hearing, we conclude that the issue is now moot. We take note, of course, that the regulation adopted by the Commissioner of Social Services (18 NYCRR 372.2 [c]) was deleted effective July 3, 1975.
Accordingly, the order should be reversed and the matter remitted to Supreme Court with directions to dismiss the petition on the ground the issue presented is moot.
Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur in Per Curiam opinion.
Order reversed, without costs, and matter remitted to Supreme Court, New York County, with directions to dismiss the petition for mootness.