Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jonny Noe APARICIO-ABARCA, also known as Johnny Noe Aparcio, also known as Jonny Noe Aparicio, also known as Johnny Noe Aparicio, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-12-15
Citations: 624 F. App'x 274
Docket Number: No. 14-20675
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jonny Noe APARICIO-ABARCA, also known as Johnny Noe Aparcio, also known as Jonny Noe Aparicio, also known as Johnny Noe Aparicio, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before JONES, SOUTHWICK, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 624
Pages: 274–274

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jonny Noe APARICIO-ABARCA, also known as Johnny Noe Aparcio, also known as Jonny Noe Aparicio, also known as Johnny Noe Aparicio, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 14-20675
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 15, 2015.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Philip G. Gallagher, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before JONES, SOUTHWICK, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jonny Noe Aparicio-Abarca has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Apar-icio-Abarca has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5/ the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.