Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jason Landis LINDER, a/k/a Black, a/k/a Rodney Peterson, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-04-06
Citations: 421 F. App'x 286
Docket Number: No. 10-7313
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jason Landis LINDER, a/k/a Black, a/k/a Rodney Peterson, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 421
Pages: 286–286

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jason Landis LINDER, a/k/a Black, a/k/a Rodney Peterson, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-7313.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 30, 2011.
Decided: April 6, 2011.
Jason Landis Linder, Appellant Pro Se. Darryl James Mitchell, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Ap-pellee.
Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jason Landis Linder appeals the district court's order denying his motion to compel the Government to move for a reduction in his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Linder, No. 2:04-cr-00016-RAJ-JEB-5 (E.D.Va. Aug. 17, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.