Case Name: Rev. Roy JONES et al., Plairitiffs-Appellants, Rose Wilson, individually and as representative of the Black and Mexican-American Voters of Lubbock, Texas, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant, v. The CITY OF LUBBOCK et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1981-03-25
Citations: 640 F.2d 777
Docket Number: No. 79-2744
Parties: Rev. Roy JONES et al., Plairitiffs-Appellants, Rose Wilson, individually and as representative of the Black and Mexican-American Voters of Lubbock, Texas, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant, v. The CITY OF LUBBOCK et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before GOLDBERG, POLITZ and SAM D. JOHNSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 640
Pages: 777–779

Head Matter:
Rev. Roy JONES et al., Plairitiffs-Appellants, Rose Wilson, individually and as representative of the Black and Mexican-American Voters of Lubbock, Texas, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant, v. The CITY OF LUBBOCK et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 79-2744.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Unit A
March 25, 1981.
William L. Garrett, Dallas, Tex., Daniel H. Benson, School of Law, Lubbock, Tex., Robert P. Davidow, George Mason Univ., School of Law, Arlington, Va., Albert Perez, Mark C. Hall, Lane Arthur, Lubbock, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellants.
James P. Brewster, Trial Atty., Dennis W. McGill, Travis D. Shelton, Lubbock, Tex., for defendants-appellees.
Before GOLDBERG, POLITZ and SAM D. JOHNSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
We remand this case for reconsideration in light of the Supreme Court's recent opinion in City of Mobile v. Bolden, 446 U.S. 55, 100 S.Ct. 1490, 64 L.Ed.2d 47 (1980). The parties should be allowed, if they so desire, to present additional evidence on remand.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.