Case Name: STATE of Louisiana v. Dwayne LEBLANC
Court: Louisiana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 2018-04-20
Citations: 240 So. 3d 918
Docket Number: No. 2016–KP–1485
Parties: STATE of Louisiana
v.
Dwayne LEBLANC
Judges: 
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 240
Pages: 918–919

Head Matter:
STATE of Louisiana
v.
Dwayne LEBLANC
No. 2016-KP-1485
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
April 20, 2018
ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Denied. Relator's application was not timely filed in the district court, and he fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; State ex rel. Glover v. State , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. In addition, relator's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is repetitive. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4(D).
Finally, relator fails to show he is factually innocent of the crimes under the standard of State v. Conway , 01-2808 (La. 4/12/02), 816 So.2d 290.
Relator has now fully litigated two applications for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
Hughes, J. would grant the writ in part.
GENOVESE, J., would grant in part and remand only to assess the Brady claim.