Case Name: Rafael A. JOSEPH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John E. POTTER, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-07-21
Citations: 285 F. App'x 474
Docket Number: No. 07-17297
Parties: Rafael A. JOSEPH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John E. POTTER, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before: SCHROEDER, LEAVY and ‘ IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 285
Pages: 474–474

Head Matter:
Rafael A. JOSEPH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John E. POTTER, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 07-17297.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 14, 2008.
Filed July 21, 2008.
Rafael A. Joseph, San Francisco, CA, pro se.
USSF-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Sap Francisco, CA, for Defendant-Appellee. ■
Before: SCHROEDER, LEAVY and ‘ IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. RApp. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
This is an appeal from a dismissal of a complaint alleging discrimination claims under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16 ("Title VII") and breach of contract. The district .court dismissed appellant's Title VII claims as time-barred and for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and the breach of contract claim for failure to state a claim. The district court also provided appellant an opportunity to amend the complaint to state a claim for breach of contract. The district court subsequently dismissed the case for failure to prosecute when plaintiff failed to amend his complaint.
A review of the record and the openipg brief indicates that the questions raised .in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam).
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.