Case Name: Antonio COLBERT, Appellant v. Richard CORDRAY, Ohio Attorney General, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-03-31
Citations: 428 F. App'x 1
Docket Number: No. 11-7006
Parties: Antonio COLBERT, Appellant v. Richard CORDRAY, Ohio Attorney General, Appellee.
Judges: Before: SENTELLE, Chief Judge, and HENDERSON and GARLAND, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 428
Pages: 1–2

Head Matter:
Antonio COLBERT, Appellant v. Richard CORDRAY, Ohio Attorney General, Appellee.
No. 11-7006.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
March 31, 2011.
Antonio Colbert, Washington, DC, pro se.
Before: SENTELLE, Chief Judge, and HENDERSON and GARLAND, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by the appellant. See Fed. RApp. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 340). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's order filed February 8, 2011, be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed appellant's complaint as frivolous. See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325, 109 S.Ct. 1827, 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989).
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.