Case Name: Paul A. MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Philip A. BADDOUR, Jr., In individual and official capacity as Board of Trustees Attorney, Wayne Community College; Kay Albertson, In individual and official capacity as President and Secretary to the Board of Trustees, Wayne Community College, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-10-03
Citations: 657 F. App'x 203
Docket Number: No. 16-1466
Parties: Paul A. MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Philip A. BADDOUR, Jr., In individual and official capacity as Board of Trustees Attorney, Wayne Community College; Kay Albertson, In individual and official capacity as President and Secretary to the Board of Trustees, Wayne Community College, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 657
Pages: 203–204

Head Matter:
Paul A. MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Philip A. BADDOUR, Jr., In individual and official capacity as Board of Trustees Attorney, Wayne Community College; Kay Albertson, In individual and official capacity as President and Secretary to the Board of Trustees, Wayne Community College, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-1466
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: September 29, 2016
Decided: October 3, 2016
Paul A. Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Margaret Dillon, Ellis & Winters, LLP, Cary, North Carolina; Nora Foster Sullivan, Ellis & Winters, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; Jason Vincent Federmack, Patricia Lee Holland, Jackson Lewis PC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Paul A. Mitchell appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mitchell v. Baddour, No. 5:15-cv-00083-H, 2016 WL 3480080 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 24, 2016). We deny Mitchell's motion for a restraining order and expedited hearing. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED