Case Name: David Lapidus, Respondent, v. Capital Neon Sign Corp., Appellant, and Le Roy M. Shear, Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1939-02-10
Citations: 170 Misc. 489
Docket Number: 
Parties: David Lapidus, Respondent, v. Capital Neon Sign Corp., Appellant, and Le Roy M. Shear, Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 170
Pages: 489–489

Head Matter:
David Lapidus, Respondent, v. Capital Neon Sign Corp., Appellant, and Le Roy M. Shear, Defendant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
February 10, 1939.
Kamer & Kamer [Frank Kamer of counsel], for the appellant.
Emma Haber, for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The mere naming of a person as managing agent of a corporation, where the answering affidavit denies control over the person sought to be examined, is insufficient for the granting of an order to examine the named person as such agent.
Judgment and orders reversed, with ten dollars costs, without prejudice to renewal of application for examination of appellant.
All concur. Present — Hammer, Shientag and Noonan, JJ.