Case Name: In the Matter of the ESTATE OF Lucy E. RUTLEDGE, Deceased. Michael D. BOBBITT, et al., Petitioners/Appellants, v. Pearl ALBRIGHT, Individually and as Personal Representative, and Earl Ray, Defendants/Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1991-02-05
Citations: 812 S.W.2d 539
Docket Number: Nos. 57802, 57834
Parties: In the Matter of the ESTATE OF Lucy E. RUTLEDGE, Deceased. Michael D. BOBBITT, et al., Petitioners/Appellants, v. Pearl ALBRIGHT, Individually and as Personal Representative, and Earl Ray, Defendants/Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 812
Pages: 539–539

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the ESTATE OF Lucy E. RUTLEDGE, Deceased. Michael D. BOBBITT, et al., Petitioners/Appellants, v. Pearl ALBRIGHT, Individually and as Personal Representative, and Earl Ray, Defendants/Respondents.
Nos. 57802, 57834.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Feb. 5, 1991.
Russell Anthony Willis, II, St. Louis, for appellants/cross-respondents.
Harold G. Johnson, Mitchell Johnson, St. Ann, for respondents/cross-appellants.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Petitioners appeal from the trial court's order in a discovery of assets action; defendant Earl Ray cross-appeals. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. As a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).