Case Name: ARCHIBALD McNEIL & SONS COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. WESTERN MARYLAND RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant in Error
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1931-08-19
Citations: 51 F.2d 1073
Docket Number: No. 4518
Parties: ARCHIBALD McNEIL & SONS COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. WESTERN MARYLAND RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant in Error.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 51
Pages: 1073–1073

Head Matter:
ARCHIBALD McNEIL & SONS COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. WESTERN MARYLAND RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant in Error.
No. 4518.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Aug. 19, 1931.
Geo. Demming, of Philadelphia, Pa., and John R. Geyer and Paul G. Smith, both of Harrisburg, Pa., for plaintiff in error.
Geo. C. Doub and Eugene S. Williams, both of Baltimore, Md., and Spencer G. Nau-man, of Harrisburg, Pa., for defendant in error.
Before DAVIS and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges, and SCHOONMAKER, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This was an action of trespass brought by Archibald McNeil & Sons Company to recover damages alleged to have been caused by the Western Maryland Railway Company in giving an undue and unreasonable preference and advantage in violation of sections 3, 8, and 9 of the Interstate Commerce Act (49 USCA § 3, 8, and 9). The District Court of the Middle District of Pennsylvania, sitting without a jury, entered judgment for the defendant [42 F.(2d) 669], and the plaintiff appealed to this court.
We have carefully considered the case, and are satisfied that error was not committed. We can add nothing to the able discussion of the case by the learned District Judge. The law declared by him is supported by the findings, which are based on substantial evidence.
We therefore affirm the judgment on his opinion.
Affirmed.