Case Name: David LOTRIDGE, Appellant, v. Wanda S. LOBASSO, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2012-11-21
Citations: 101 So. 3d 402
Docket Number: No. 4D11-4391
Parties: David LOTRIDGE, Appellant, v. Wanda S. LOBASSO, Appellee.
Judges: GROSS, CIKLIN and CONNER, JJ„ concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 101
Pages: 402–403

Head Matter:
David LOTRIDGE, Appellant, v. Wanda S. LOBASSO, Appellee.
No. 4D11-4391.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Nov. 21, 2012.
David Lotridge, Indiantown, pro se.
No brief filed for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In August, 2003, the circuit court entered an agreed final injunction for protection against repeat violence against appellant. In May, 2011, appellant moved to vacate, modify, or dissolve the injunction; he alleged changed circumstances and contended that the injunction had served its purpose. The circuit court summarily denied the motion without a hearing. We reverse and remand for a hearing on appellant's motion, where he shall have "a meaningful opportunity to be heard." Colarusso v. Lupetin, 28 So.3d 238, 239 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).
GROSS, CIKLIN and CONNER, JJ" concur.