Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee. v. Emory Allan PETTRY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-12-16
Citations: 115 F. App'x 231
Docket Number: No. 04-40599
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee. v. Emory Allan PETTRY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 115
Pages: 231–232

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee. v. Emory Allan PETTRY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 04-40599.
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Decided Dec. 16, 2004.
Traci Lynne Kenner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tyler, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Thomas Scott Smith, Smith & Smith, Sherman, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Emory Allen Pettry appeals his sentence following a guilty plea conviction for possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute, using and carrying a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime, and manufacturing an unregistered firearm. Pettry argues that the district court misapplied the Sentencing Guidelines by enhancing his offense level for manufacturing an unregistered firearm on the basis that Pettry manufactured the firearm in connection with another felony offense. Pettry argues that the sentence enhancement is erroneous in light of U.S.S.G. § 2K2.4, comment, (n.4), because his sentence for manufacturing a firearm is to be served consecutively to his sentence for using and carrying a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime.
Pettry's sentence for manufacturing an unregistered firearm was not enhanced based on his use of a firearm, but because he manufactured the device in connection with the felony offense of manufacturing methamphetamine. Accordingly, we find no error in the district court's sentencing determination. United States v. Washington, 340 F.3d 222, 230-31 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1081, 124 S.Ct. 942, 157 L.Ed.2d 757 (2003).
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.