Case Name: Rose Cohen, Respondent, v. The Manhattan Railway Company and Another, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1895-06
Citations: 94 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 623
Docket Number: 
Parties: Rose Cohen, Respondent, v. The Manhattan Railway Company and Another, Appellants.
Judges: Present — Van Brunt, P. J., O’Brien and Parker, JJ.
Reporter: Supreme Court Reports (Hun)
Volume: 94
Pages: 623–623

Head Matter:
Rose Cohen, Respondent, v. The Manhattan Railway Company and Another, Appellants.

Opinion:
Judgment modified as directed and affirmed as modified, without costs.
Per Curiam :
The fee damage in this case should he reduced to $1,250, the rental damage to $100 a year, and the extra allowance to $100. The judgment as so modified should be affirmed, without costs to either party.
Present — Van Brunt, P. J., O'Brien and Parker, JJ.