Case Name: Berwick C. O'BRIEN, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1971-04-13
Citations: 439 F.2d 1201
Docket Number: No. 30392
Parties: Berwick C. O'BRIEN, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 439
Pages: 1201–1202

Head Matter:
Berwick C. O'BRIEN, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 30392.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 13, 1971.
Johnnie M. Walters, Asst. Atty. Gen., Fred B. Ugast, Asst. Atty. Gen. Acting, Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington,
D. C., Daniel L. Penner, Atty., Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Fort Worth, Tex., Anthony J. P. Farris, U. S. Atty., Meyer Rothwacks, Thomas L. Stapleton, Charles E. Anderson, Attys., Tax Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., George R. Pain, James R. Gough, Asst. U. S. Attys. Southern District of Texas, Houston, Tex., for appellant.
Melvin M. Engel, Engel, Groom, Miglicco & Sullins, Houston, Tex., for appellee.
Before MORGAN and CLARK, Circuit Judges, and SKELTON , Judge of the U. S. Court of Claims.
Judge Byron Skelton, sitting by. designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
In this tax refund case, there was ample evidence to support the jury verdict that a portion of the amount paid by a husband to his wife pursuant to a property settlement agreement accompanying their divorce was properly attributable to her covenant not to compete in his business which was incorporated in the settlement agreement by the husband.
Neither do we find any error in the district court's jury instructions or rulings on the admissibility of evidence.
Nothing remains, then, but to direct that the judgment of the district court be and is hereby
Affirmed.