Case Name: ROGER GOULD ET AL. v. MELLICK AND SEXTON; NORMAN KEITH ET AL. v. MELLICK AND SEXTON
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 2001-12-20
Citations: 259 Conn. 902
Docket Number: SC 16659
Parties: ROGER GOULD ET AL. v. MELLICK AND SEXTON NORMAN KEITH ET AL. v. MELLICK AND SEXTON
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 259
Pages: 902–902

Head Matter:
ROGER GOULD ET AL. v. MELLICK AND SEXTON NORMAN KEITH ET AL. v. MELLICK AND SEXTON
The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16659.
David J. Robertson, in support of the petition.
StevenH. Solomson, Julia B. Morris, RobertB. Cohen and James Stedronsky, in opposition.
Decided December 20, 2001

Opinion:
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 66 Conn. App. 542 (AC 20228/ AC 20230), is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court lacked authority to render summary judgment because: (1) the case was complex; and (2) there were disputed questions of facts?"