Case Name: FLORIDA TANK LINES, INC., Petitioner, v. Jerry W. CARTER, Wilbur C. King, and Edwin L. Mason, as members of and constituting the Florida Railroad and Public Utilities Commission, Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1960-10-12
Citations: 123 So. 2d 556
Docket Number: 
Parties: FLORIDA TANK LINES, INC., Petitioner, v. Jerry W. CARTER, Wilbur C. King, and Edwin L. Mason, as members of and constituting the Florida Railroad and Public Utilities Commission, Respondents.
Judges: THOMAS, C. J., and TERRELL, HOB-SON, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 123
Pages: 556–557

Head Matter:
FLORIDA TANK LINES, INC., Petitioner, v. Jerry W. CARTER, Wilbur C. King, and Edwin L. Mason, as members of and constituting the Florida Railroad and Public Utilities Commission, Respondents.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Oct. 12, 1960.
Rehearing Denied Nov. 2, 1960.
James F. Minnet and Minnet, Allsworth, Doumar, Schuler & Elliott, Fort Lauder-dale, for petitioner.
Lewis W. Petteway and Guyte P. Mc-Cord, Jr., Tallahassee, for respondents.
William P. Tomasello, Bartow, and Kelly, Paige & Black, Miami, for Miami Transfer Co., Inc., Leonard Bros. Transfer & Storage Co., Inc., Fort Lauderdale Transfer Co. and Commercial Carrier Corp.
O. C. Beakes, Jacksonville, for Suwannee Transfer, Inc.
Wayne K. Ramsay and Milam, LeMais-tre, Ramsey & Martin, Jacksonville, for Central Truck Lines, Gould Trucking Co. and Tamiami Trail Tours, Inc.
Martin Sack of Sack & Sack, Jacksonville, for Ploof Transfer Co., Inc., inter-venor-respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition for certiorari we are requested to quash an order of the respondent Commission which denied to the petitioner the privilege of unrestricted domiciling of heavy hauling equipment. This litigation was previously before us in Leonard Bros. Transfer & Storage Co., Inc. v. Boyd, Fla. 1958, 104 So.2d 489. Our consideration of the instant record and briefs leads us to the conclusion that the findings and order of the respondent Commission are supported by competent substantial evidence. We do not find that there has been any deviation from the essential requirements of the law.
The petition for certiorari is therefore denied on authority of rule announced in Florida Motor Lines, Inc. v. State Railroad Commission, 101 Fla. 1018, 132 So. 851; Florida Rate Conference v. Florida Railroad and P. U. Commission, Fla., 108 So.2d 601; Fogarty Bros. Transfer, Inc. v. Boyd, Fla., 109 So.2d 883; Butler et al. v. Carter et al., Fla., 123 So.2d 313, and, Gainesville Bonded Warehouse, Inc., et al. v. Carter et al., Fla., 123 So.2d 336.
It is so ordered.
THOMAS, C. J., and TERRELL, HOB-SON, THORNAL and O'CONNELL, JJ., concur.