Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Emerson Boyd AUSTIN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-12-29
Citations: 305 F. App'x 428
Docket Number: No. 07-10198
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Emerson Boyd AUSTIN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 305
Pages: 428–428

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Emerson Boyd AUSTIN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-10198.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 17, 2008.
Filed Dec. 29, 2008.
Kimberly M. Hare, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marc J. Victor, Esq., Chandler, AZ, for DefendanL-Appellant.
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Emerson Boyd Austin appealed from his jury-trial conviction and 600-month sentence for aggravated sexual abuse, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1153, 2241(a), and 2246(2)(A) and (2)(D), and sexual abuse of a minor, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1153, 2243(a) and 2246(2)(A).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Austin's counsel filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Austin filed a pro se supplemental brief and a pro se motion to appoint new counsel. No answering brief has been filed.
The record indicates that Austin is now deceased. Therefore, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, Austin's pro se motion to appoint new counsel is DENIED, and we dismiss the appeal as moot.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.