Case Name: Hirsh & Schofield, Inc., Appellant, v. Aage Gusmer, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1915-12
Citations: 171 A.D. 935
Docket Number: 
Parties: Hirsh & Schofield, Inc., Appellant, v. Aage Gusmer, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 171
Pages: 935–935

Head Matter:
Hirsh & Schofield, Inc., Appellant, v. Aage Gusmer, Respondent.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 10th day of November, 1915, denying a motion for the continuance of a temporary injunction pendente lite.

Opinion:
Per Curiam:
Without determining whether or not the plaintiff would be entitled to an injunction by final judgment after a trial of the action, we think the court was justified in refusing to continue the temporary injunction. The order appealed from is, therefore, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Clarke, Scott and Smith, JJ. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.