Case Name: GLADYS M. CANFIELD, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE BOROUGH OF PINE HILL, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1968-04-01
Citations: 51 N.J. 400
Docket Number: 
Parties: GLADYS M. CANFIELD, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE BOROUGH OF PINE HILL, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 51
Pages: 400–403

Head Matter:
GLADYS M. CANFIELD, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE BOROUGH OF PINE HILL, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Argued March 5, 1968
Decided April 1, 1968.
Mr. Frank F. Vittori argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Piarulli and Vittori, attorneys).
Mr. Cassel B. Buhlman, Jr., argued the cause for respondent.

Opinion:
Pee Cueiam.
The judgment is reversed for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Gaulkin in the Appellate Division, 97 N. J. Super. 483.