Case Name: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BY THE COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CHARLES INVESTMENT CORPORATION, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND SAVE WAY STATIONS, INC., HACKENSACK WATER COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, AND TOWN OF SECAUCUS, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1978-05-02
Citations: 76 N.J. 86
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BY THE COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CHARLES INVESTMENT CORPORATION, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND SAVE WAY STATIONS, INC., HACKENSACK WATER COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, AND TOWN OF SECAUCUS, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 76
Pages: 86–86

Head Matter:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BY THE COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CHARLES INVESTMENT CORPORATION, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND SAVE WAY STATIONS, INC., HACKENSACK WATER COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, AND TOWN OF SECAUCUS, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS.
Argued April 11, 1978
Decided May 2, 1978.
Mr. Harold F. Kushin argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Wilentz, Goldman and Spilzer, attorneys; Ms. M. Kathleen Duncan, on the brief).
Mr. Philip F. Mattia, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. John J. Degnan, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Mr. Stephen Shillman, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinions of the Appellate Division, reported at 151 N. J. Super. 14 (1977), and the Law Division, reported at 143 N. J. Super. 541 (1976).
For affirmance— Chief Justice Hughes, Justices Sullivan, Pashman, Clifford, Schreiber and Handler and Judge Conford — 7.
For reversal — Hone.