Case Name: ROAN v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1915-06-02
Citations: 177 S.W. 492
Docket Number: No. 3584
Parties: ROAN v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 177
Pages: 492–492

Head Matter:
ROAN v. STATE.
(No. 3584.)
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
June 2, 1915.)
Cbiminal Law <&wkey;1097 — Appea:i>-Pbesentation non Review — Sueeicienoy oe Evidence— Statement oe Facts.
The sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a verdict of guilty cannot be considered on appeal, in the absence of a statement of facts.
[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2862, 2864, 2926, 2934, 2938, 2939, 2941, 2942, 2947; Dec. Dig. &wkey;1097J
Appeal from District Court, Tarrant County; Marvin H. Brown, Judge.
Ed Roan was convicted of burglary, and appeals.
Affirmed.
C. C. McDonald, Asst. Atty G.en., for the State.

Opinion:
PRENDERGAST, P. J.
Appellant was convicted of burglary.
There is neither a statement of facts nor bill of exceptions in the record. The only ground of the motion for new trial is that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict. Of course, this cannot be considered, in the absence of a statement of facts.
There being nothing we can review, the judgment is affirmed.