Case Name: Ensell et al. v. Atlantic Refining Company, Appellant
Court: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1928-03-02
Citations: 92 Pa. Super. 590
Docket Number: Appeal No. 313
Parties: Ensell et al. v. Atlantic Refining Company, Appellant.
Judges: Before Porter, P. J., Henderson, Trexler, Keller, Linn, Gawthrop and Cunningham, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania Superior Court Reports
Volume: 92
Pages: 590–591

Head Matter:
Ensell et al. v. Atlantic Refining Company, Appellant.
March 2, 1928:
Argued October 19, 1927.
Before Porter, P. J., Henderson, Trexler, Keller, Linn, Gawthrop and Cunningham, JJ.

Opinion:
Opinion by
Cunningham, J.,
In an opinion this day filed at No. 312, October T., 1927, we have stated our reasons for affirming the judgment entered upon the verdict in favor of Rebecca Ensell, the wife of the appellee in this appeal. There is no complaint about the amount of the verdict in favor of Albert Ensell as it was for the exact amount of the cost of repairing his automobile. With this exception the cases are identical.
Judgment affirmed.