Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gordon J. BISHOP, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-09-20
Citations: 109 F. App'x 853
Docket Number: No. 03-30477
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gordon J. BISHOP, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: PREGERSON, T.G. NELSON, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 109
Pages: 853–853

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gordon J. BISHOP, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 03-30477.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 13, 2004.
Decided Sept. 20, 2004.
Klaus P. Richter, Esq., Billings, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Mark S. Werner, Esq., Billings, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: PREGERSON, T.G. NELSON, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Gordon Jay Bishop appeals the district court's order revoking his supervised release and imposing an 18-month sentence upon revocation. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Bishop's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Bishop did not file a pro se supplemental brief, and the government did not file a brief.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.