Case Name: Jeff FARMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MHM MARYLAND, INC.; Dr. Vincent Siracusano; Dr. Howard Penn, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-02-29
Citations: 634 F. App'x 925
Docket Number: No. 15-7220
Parties: Jeff FARMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MHM MARYLAND, INC.; Dr. Vincent Siracusano; Dr. Howard Penn, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 634
Pages: 925–925

Head Matter:
Jeff FARMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MHM MARYLAND, INC.; Dr. Vincent Siracusano; Dr. Howard Penn, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15-7220.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 25, 2016.
Decided: Feb. 29, 2016.
Jeff Farmer, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald McGlenn Cherry, Bonner Kiernan Trebach & Crociata LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jeff Farmer appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Farmer's motions to reexamine filing in forma pau-peris, for appointment of counsel, for in-junctive relief, and to amend the complaint, and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Farmer v. MHM Md., Inc., No. 8:14-cv-03080-PWG (D.Md. July 2, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be-. fore this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.