Case Name: Georgia GREEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WARDEN; Medical Staff of Anne Arundel County Detention CEnter; Doctor Jani; Doctor Rivera, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-03-25
Citations: 61 F. App'x 78
Docket Number: No. 02-7751
Parties: Georgia GREEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WARDEN; Medical Staff of Anne Arundel County Detention CEnter; Doctor Jani; Doctor Rivera, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 61
Pages: 78–79

Head Matter:
Georgia GREEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WARDEN; Medical Staff of Anne Arundel County Detention CEnter; Doctor Jani; Doctor Rivera, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 02-7751.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 20, 2003.
Decided March 25, 2003.
Georgia Green, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Georgia Green seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because Green's notice of appeal was not timely filed.
Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court's final judgment or order to note an appeal, see Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (1960)).
The district court's order was entered on the docket on May 30, 2002. Green's notice of appeal was filed no earlier than November 6, 2002. Because Green failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. See Fed. R.App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988).