Case Name: Larry LEATHERWOOD, Appellant, v. ROYAL OAKS RENTALS, a company, Royal Oaks Condominium Association, a Florida corporation, Frederick H. Miller, and St. Jean Roofing, a Florida corporation, individually, jointly and severally, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1985-05-08
Citations: 473 So. 2d 721
Docket Number: Nos. 84-677, 84-679
Parties: Larry LEATHERWOOD, Appellant, v. ROYAL OAKS RENTALS, a company, Royal Oaks Condominium Association, a Florida corporation, Frederick H. Miller, and St. Jean Roofing, a Florida corporation, individually, jointly and severally, Appellees.
Judges: HERSEY and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 473
Pages: 721–721

Head Matter:
Larry LEATHERWOOD, Appellant, v. ROYAL OAKS RENTALS, a company, Royal Oaks Condominium Association, a Florida corporation, Frederick H. Miller, and St. Jean Roofing, a Florida corporation, individually, jointly and severally, Appellees.
Nos. 84-677, 84-679.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
May 8, 1985.
Larry Leatherwood, pro se.

Opinion:
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING/CLARIFICATION
PER CURIAM.
We withdraw our per curiam affirmance of December 19, 1984, and reverse the order quashing service on Royal Oaks Rentals. A motion alleging a defect in personal jurisdiction should set forth sufficient facts to demonstrate the defect in service and how the defect can be cured. See Bodden v. Young, 422 So.2d 1055, 1056 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Over 30 Association v. Blatt, 118 So.2d 71 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960).
We remand for further proceedings below.
HERSEY and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.
HURLEY, J., dissents without opinion.