Case Name: Prentis L. HERNDON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ALUTIIQ EDUCATION AND TRAINING, LLC, Defendant-Appellant, and Janina Zequeira-Perez, Defendant. Ahtna, Inc.; Arctic Slope Regional Corporation; Bristol Bay Native Corporation; Calista Corporation; Chugach Alaska Corporation; Koniag, Inc.; Old Harbor Native Corporation; Sealaska Corporation, Amici Supporting Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-05-05
Citations: 688 F. App'x 222
Docket Number: No. 16-1964
Parties: Prentis L. HERNDON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ALUTIIQ EDUCATION AND TRAINING, LLC, Defendant-Appellant, and Janina Zequeira-Perez, Defendant. Ahtna, Inc.; Arctic Slope Regional Corporation; Bristol Bay Native Corporation; Calista Corporation; Chugach Alaska Corporation; Koniag, Inc.; Old Harbor Native Corporation; Sealaska Corporation, Amici Supporting Appellant.
Judges: Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 688
Pages: 222–222

Head Matter:
Prentis L. HERNDON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ALUTIIQ EDUCATION AND TRAINING, LLC, Defendant-Appellant, and Janina Zequeira-Perez, Defendant. Ahtna, Inc.; Arctic Slope Regional Corporation; Bristol Bay Native Corporation; Calista Corporation; Chugach Alaska Corporation; Koniag, Inc.; Old Harbor Native Corporation; Sealaska Corporation, Amici Supporting Appellant.
No. 16-1964
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 27, 2017
Decided: May 5, 2017
Ramsay C. McCullough, Kristina H. Va-quera, JACKSON LEWIS PC, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellant. Prentis L. Hern-don, Appellee Pro Se. Kevin Mark Cuddy, Sarah Langberg, STOEL RIVES LLP, Anchorage, Alaska, for Amici Supporting Appellant.
Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Alutiiq Education & Training, LLC ("AET") seeks to appeal the district court's order denying its motion for summary judgment. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 546-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order AET seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp., 546 U.S. 500, 515-16, 126 S.Ct. 1235, 163 L.Ed.2d 1097 (2006); see also 43 U.S.C. § 1626(g) (2012). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, and deny Herndon's motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED