Case Name: David Ramondi, Respondent, v. Paramount Leasehold, L.P., Defendant, and Otis Elevator Company, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2007-02-06
Citations: 37 A.D.3d 447
Docket Number: 
Parties: David Ramondi, Respondent, v Paramount Leasehold, L.P., Defendant, and Otis Elevator Company, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 37
Pages: 447–447

Head Matter:
David Ramondi, Respondent, v Paramount Leasehold, L.P., Defendant, and Otis Elevator Company, Appellant.
[831 NYS2d 188]-

Opinion:
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Otis Elevator Company appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Harkavy, J.), dated September 13, 2006, as denied its motion to change venue from Kings County to Westchester County.
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for a hearing in accordance herewith, and thereafter for a new determination of the motion.
The plaintiff selected Kings County as the venue of this action based upon his purported residence (see CPLR 503 [a]). The appellant moved to change venue (see CPLR 511), presenting evidence that the plaintiff resided in Nassau County when he commenced the action. The plaintiffs opposition papers raised an issue of fact as to whether he resided in Kings County or Nassau County at the time of commencement of this action. Since the issue of fact could not properly have been resolved on the papers alone, the Supreme Court should have held a hearing on the issue of residency. Mastro, J.P, Ritter, Skelos, Garni and McCarthy, JJ., concur.