Case Name: In the Matter of K. L., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. K. L., Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2013-10-16
Citations: 259 Or. App. 51
Docket Number: 130261623; A153731
Parties: In the Matter of K. L., Alleged to be a Mentally 111 Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. K. L., Appellant.
Judges: Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Nakamoto, Judge, and Egan, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 259
Pages: 51–52

Head Matter:
Submitted September 6,
reversed October 16, 2013
In the Matter of K. L., Alleged to be a Mentally 111 Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. K. L., Appellant.
Multnomah County Circuit Court
130261623; A153731
312 P3d 580
Garrett A. Richardson and Multnomah Defenders, Inc., filed the brief for appellant.
Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General, and Kathleen Cegla, Senior Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Nakamoto, Judge, and Egan, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Appellant seeks reversal of an order committing her as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. In her second assignment of error, she contends that the state failed to prove, by clear and convincing evidence, that, as the result of a mental disorder, she is dangerous to herself or others. ORS 426.005(l)(e)(A). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the involuntary commitment and that the order should be reversed. We agree, accept the state's concession, and reverse on that basis. Accordingly, we do not address appellant's other assignment of error, in which she argues that the trial court erred in not advising her of all of the potential consequences of the civil commitment proceeding as required by ORS 426.100(1).
Reversed.