Case Name: Mary R. Boylan, complainant-respondent, v. Loy Corporation et al., defendants-appellants
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1941-09-19
Citations: 130 N.J. Eq. 203
Docket Number: 
Parties: Mary R. Boylan, complainant-respondent, v. Loy Corporation et al., defendants-appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 130
Pages: 203–203

Head Matter:
Mary R. Boylan, complainant-respondent, v. Loy Corporation et al., defendants-appellants.
[Argued May 28th, 1941.
Decided September 19th, 1941.]
Mr. Benjamin J. Darling and Mr. John H. Jotes, for the appellants.
Messrs. Marcus & Katz and Mr. William H. Speer, for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The facts are set forth at length in the opinion of the Yice-Chancellor and need not be repeated here. We are of the opinion that, under the particular circumstances of this case, a right of way by necessity arose in favor of the complainant over the land of the defendant Loy Corporation. Although it can make no difference in the determination of this case, it is to be noted that the ease of Blumberg v. Weiss, 126 N. J. Eq. 616; 10 Atl. Rep. (2d) 743, cited in the opinion below, was reversed in this court, 129 N. J. Eq. 34; 17 Atl. Rep. (2d) 823.
The decree is affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Colie, Dear, Wells, Raeeerty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.