Case Name: William E. CLARK, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-01-30
Citations: 42 S.W.3d 685
Docket Number: No. WD 58335
Parties: William E. CLARK, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before BRECKENRIDGE, P.J., ULRICH and HOWARD, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 42
Pages: 685–685

Head Matter:
William E. CLARK, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 58335.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jan. 30, 2001.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 27, 2001.
Application to Transfer Denied May 29, 2001.
Stephen M. Patton, Asst. Public Defender, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John Munson Moms, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before BRECKENRIDGE, P.J., ULRICH and HOWARD, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
William Clark appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Mr. Clark had pled guilty to one count of second-degree trafficking, one count of second-degree murder, and one count of armed criminal action. The court imposed sentences of fifteen years, thirty years, and fifteen years, respectively. The thirty-year sentence is to run concurrently with one of the fifteen-year sentences and consecutively to the other, so Mr. Clark's total term of imprisonment is forty-five years. On appeal, Mr. Clark claims that his guilty plea was not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made because his plea counsel misled him to believe that if he pled guilty, the trial court would sentence him to a total term of only twenty years' imprisonment. Since a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).