Case Name: Nathaniel Flores PAZCOGUIN, Petitioner, v. Donald A. RADCLIFFE, District Director; Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondents
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-10-25
Citations: 308 F.3d 934
Docket Number: No. 00-70595
Parties: Nathaniel Flores PAZCOGUIN, Petitioner, v. Donald A. RADCLIFFE, District Director; Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondents.
Judges: Before: THOMPSON, O’SCANNLAIN, BERZON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 308
Pages: 934–939

Head Matter:
Nathaniel Flores PAZCOGUIN, Petitioner, v. Donald A. RADCLIFFE, District Director; Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondents.
No. 00-70595.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Nov. 5, 2001.
Filed June 25, 2002.
Amended Oct. 25, 2002.
James A. Stanton, Honolulu, HI, for the petitioner.
Jeffrey J. Bernstein, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the respondents.
Before: THOMPSON, O’SCANNLAIN, BERZON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dissent by
Judge BERZON.
ORDER
The opinion in this case, filed June 25, 2002 and published at 292 F.3d 1209 (9th Cir.2002), is amended by striking therefrom the dissent of Judge Berzon, and substituting in its place Judge Berzon's dissent filed contemporaneously with this order. No change is made in the majority opinion.
Judges Thompson and O'Scannlain have voted to deny the Petition for Rehearing. Judge O'Scannlain has voted to deny the Petition for Rehearing En Banc, and Judge Thompson has recommended denial of that petition. Judge Berzon has voted to grant the Petition for Rehearing and the Petition for Rehearing En Banc.
The full court has been advised of the Petition for Rehearing En Banc, and no judge of the court has requested a vote on that petition. See Fed. R.App. P. 35(b).
The Petition for Rehearing and the Petition for Rehearing En Banc are DENIED.