Case Name: Cincinnati Bar Association v. Grote
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1990-04-18
Citations: 50 Ohio St. 3d 156
Docket Number: No. 89-2164
Parties: Cincinnati Bar Association v. Grote.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 50
Pages: 156–157

Head Matter:
Cincinnati Bar Association v. Grote.
[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Grote (1990), 50 Ohio St. 3d 156.]
(No. 89-2164
Submitted February 21, 1990
Decided April 18, 1990.)
Carolyn A. Taggart and Joseph L. Trauth, Jr., for relator.
James N. Perry, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We agree that respondent violated DR. 1-102(A)(4) and 6-101(A)(3). However, we find respondent's misconduct deserving of a more severe sanction than that recommended by the board. Accordingly, respondent is hereby ordered suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for one year. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.