Case Name: O.B., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2003-11-19
Citations: 858 So. 2d 1278
Docket Number: No. 3D03-1449
Parties: O.B., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., GREEN and WELLS, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 858
Pages: 1278–1279

Head Matter:
O.B., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D03-1449.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 19, 2003.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Gwendolyn Powell Braswell, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General and Richard L. Polin, Assistant Attorney General and Rebecca M. Plasencia, Certified Legal Intern, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., GREEN and WELLS, JJ.

Opinion:
SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.
The adjudication below of delinquency for grand theft of a dirt bike is reduced to petit theft because the evidence was insufficient to establish that the value of the bike at the time of the theft was more than the $300 statutory amount. See § 812.014(2)(c)l, Fla. Stat. (2003). Specifically, evidence simply that the bike had been purchased seven months before for $3000, without any expert or other testimony concerning the extent of the dimin-ishment in value caused by both its use and the fact that, as the evidence showed, significant damage was sustained by the bike during that period, was legally insufficient. See Negron v. State, 306 So.2d 104 (Fla.1974). A conviction on the more serious charge cannot be based, as it apparently was here, upon what must be the purely speculative conclusion that the bike "could not" have depreciated or its value diminished that much. See J.O. v. State, 552 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).
Affirmed as modified.