Case Name: B C P CORPORATION, a Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1969-07-28
Citations: 415 F.2d 327
Docket Number: No. 22868
Parties: B C P CORPORATION, a Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 415
Pages: 327–327

Head Matter:
B C P CORPORATION, a Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 22868.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
July 28, 1969.
D. Thompson Slutes (argued), of Lesher, Scruggs, Rucker, Kimble & Lindamood, Tucson, Ariz., for appellant.
Lawrence Turoff (argued), Asst. U. S. Atty., Richard K. Burke, U. S. Atty., Phoenix, Ariz., for appellee.
Before HAMLEY, BROWNING, and ELY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Plaintiff brought suit under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346, to recover damages incurred when plaintiff's tractor-trailer attempted to pass a five-vehicle United States Air Force convoy on an Arizona highway. Plaintiff's principal theory was that one of the vehicles in the convoy negligently crossed the center line, forcing his tractor-trailer off the highway.
There was a sharp conflict in the evidence, both between witnesses and between statements made by each witness at different times. The district court found that the government vehicle had not crossed the center line, and that no other negligence occurred in the operation of the convoy. Although the able and forceful presentation of plaintiff's counsel demonstrates that the question is an exceedingly close one, after a careful examination of the record we are unable to say that the district court clearly erred in its evaluation of the conflicting testimony and that the court's findings are therefore not supported by substantial evidence. We affirm.