Case Name: Richard EMANUEL, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION and Harry K. Singletary, Respondents
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1998-07-29
Citations: 742 So. 2d 292
Docket Number: No. 97-4300
Parties: Richard EMANUEL, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION and Harry K. Singletary, Respondents.
Judges: JOANOS and WEBSTER, JJ. and SHIVERS, DOUGLASS B., Senior Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 742
Pages: 292–293

Head Matter:
Richard EMANUEL, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION and Harry K. Singletary, Respondents.
No. 97-4300.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
July 29, 1998.
R. Mitchell Prugh, Melrose, for petitioner.
William L. Camper, General Counsel, and Bradley R. Bischoff, Assistant General Counsel, for respondent Florida Parole Commission; Louis A. Vargas, General Counsel and Susan Schwartz, Assistant General Counsel, for respondent Single-tary.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In accordance with Sheley v. Florida Parole Commission, 703 So.2d 1202 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), we have treated this appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari, and we deny relief on the merits. However, to the extent we have undertaken review by certiorari, we certify conflict, as we did in Sheley, with Johnson v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 543 So.2d 875 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).
JOANOS and WEBSTER, JJ. and SHIVERS, DOUGLASS B., Senior Judge, concur.