Case Name: John and Ellen WILLIAMS, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. John K. PRUELLAGE, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1996-05-21
Citations: 922 S.W.2d 437
Docket Number: No. 69113
Parties: John and Ellen WILLIAMS, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. John K. PRUELLAGE, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before GERALD M. SMITH, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 922
Pages: 437–438

Head Matter:
John and Ellen WILLIAMS, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. John K. PRUELLAGE, Defendant/Respondent.
No. 69113.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
May 21, 1996.
Richard B. Dempsey, Dempsey, Nangle, Cooper, Niemann & Biting, Washington, for appellants.
Henry D. Menghini, Evans & Dixon, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before GERALD M. SMITH, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiffs/appellants, John and Ellen Williams, appeal the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis finding their legal malpractice action barred by the statute of limitations and entering summary judgment in favor of defendant/respondent, John K. Pruellage. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find no error. As an extended opinion would serve no jurispru dential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).