Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hector ALCANTAR-MURILLO a.k.a. Hector Alcantar-Morio, a.k.a. Hector J. Alcantal, a.k.a. Hector Javier Alcantar, a.k.a. Victor Montoya, Hector Alcantar Alcantar, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-04-19
Citations: 8 F. App'x 704
Docket Number: No. 00-50146; D.C. No. CR-98-1091-MMM
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hector ALCANTAR-MURILLO a.k.a. Hector Alcantar-Morio, a.k.a. Hector J. Alcantal, a.k.a. Hector Javier Alcantar, a.k.a. Victor Montoya, Hector Alcantar Alcantar, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 8
Pages: 704–705

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hector ALCANTAR-MURILLO a.k.a. Hector Alcantar-Morio, a.k.a. Hector J. Alcantal, a.k.a. Hector Javier Alcantar, a.k.a. Victor Montoya, Hector Alcantar Alcantar, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 00-50146.
D.C. No. CR-98-1091-MMM.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 9, 2001.
Decided April 19, 2001.
Before CANBY, KOZINSKI, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Hector AIcantar-Murillo appeals his conviction, pursuant to a guilty plea, and sentence for being an alien found in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.
Relying on Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), Alcantar-Murillo contends that the district court erred when it increased his base offense level by 16 points, because the fact that his prior deportation followed an aggravated felony conviction was neither admitted nor proven beyond a reasonable doubt to a jury. He further contends that Apprendi calls into question the continuing validity of Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Alcantar-Murillo's contentions, however, are foreclosed by our recent decision in United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411, 413-14 (9th Cir.2000), amended (Feb. 8, 2001). United States v. Castillo-Rivera, 244 F.3d 1020 (9th Cir.2001).
AFFIRMED.
. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.