Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Javier BOTELLO-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-06-16
Citations: 326 F. App'x 833
Docket Number: No. 08-20424
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Javier BOTELLO-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 326
Pages: 833–833

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Javier BOTELLO-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-20424
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
June 16, 2009.
James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Joe L. Hernandez, Hernandez & Associates, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Javier Botello-Garcia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Botello-Garcia has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel's brief, and Botello-Garcia's response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Botello-Garcia's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; such claims generally "cannot be resolved on direct appeal when [they have] not been raised before the district court since no opportunity existed to develop the record on the merits of the allegations." United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir.2006) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.