Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Dametrell K. WASHINGTON, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-07-22
Citations: 110 S.W.3d 861
Docket Number: No. ED 81845
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Dametrell K. WASHINGTON, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR. and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 110
Pages: 861–861

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Dametrell K. WASHINGTON, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 81845.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
July 22, 2003.
Irene Karnes, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John Munson Morris, III, Jefferson City, MO, Joel A. Block, Asst. Atty’s Gen., for respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR. and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant, Dametrell Washington, appeals the judgment entered upon his conviction for second-degree drug trafficking, Section 195.233.3 RSMo 2000. The defendant argues that the trial court erred in (1) imposing judgment and sentence against him due to insufficient evidence and in (2) denying his motion for a new trial because the venire panel saw him in his jail attire. We affirm.
We have reviewed the parties' briefs and the record on appeal. An opinion reciting detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).