Case Name: Lonzine ADAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-11-20
Citations: 696 So. 2d 773
Docket Number: No. 95-01100
Parties: Lonzine ADAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: DANAHY, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 696
Pages: 773–774

Head Matter:
Lonzine ADAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 95-01100.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Nov. 20, 1996.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Amy Porinchak Thornhill, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Susan D. Dunlevy, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Lonzine Adams appeals his judgment and sentence for possession of cocaine with the intent to sell. We affirm his conviction. The trial court did not err in permitting an experienced narcotics officer to testify that the quantity of crack cocaine and the circumstances of its possession were consistent with possession with the intent to sell, as contrasted with simple possession. See Bruce v. State, 616 So.2d 504 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993).
We strike the $2 cost imposed pursuant to section 943.25(13), Florida Statutes (1993), because the trial court did not announce this discretionary cost at sentencing. See Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).
DANAHY, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and QUINCE, JJ., concur.