Case Name: Rosalie A. Oakley et al., Resp'ts, v. Frederick W. Bleckwenn, Treasurer, etc., et al., App'lts
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1891-04-28
Citations: 37 N.Y. St. Rep. 390
Docket Number: 
Parties: Rosalie A. Oakley et al., Resp’ts, v. Frederick W. Bleckwenn, Treasurer, etc., et al., App’lts.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 37
Pages: 390–391

Head Matter:
Rosalie A. Oakley et al., Resp’ts, v. Frederick W. Bleckwenn, Treasurer, etc., et al., App’lts.
(Court of Appeals,
Filed April 28, 1891.)
George W. Stephens and J. Langdon Ward, for app’lts ; Joseph H. Choate, for resp’ts.
Affirming 35 N. Y. State Rep., 647.

Opinion:
Mem.
The question in this case is the same as that decided by us in case of The People ex rel. Oakley v. Bleckwenn, upon the argument of which this appeal was submitted.
The judgment here appealed from should, therefore, be affirmed, with costs to the respondents.
All concur, exeept Andrews,'J., not voting, and Earl, J., dissenting.