Case Name: In the Matter of Frederick Franklin, Respondent, v. Tara Christie Miner, as Records Access Officer, New York County District Attorney's Office, Respondent. Association of Surrogate's and Supreme Court Reporters Within the City of New York, Intervenor-Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2006-06-08
Citations: 7 N.Y.3d 735
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Frederick Franklin, Respondent, v Tara Christie Miner, as Records Access Officer, New York County District Attorney’s Office, Respondent. Association of Surrogate’s and Supreme Court Reporters Within the City of New York, Intervenor-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 7
Pages: 735–735

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Frederick Franklin, Respondent, v Tara Christie Miner, as Records Access Officer, New York County District Attorney’s Office, Respondent. Association of Surrogate’s and Supreme Court Reporters Within the City of New York, Intervenor-Appellant.
Submitted March 6, 2006;
decided June 8, 2006

Opinion:
Motion for leave to appeal denied. The Court of Appeals restates the rule that denial of a motion for leave to appeal is not equivalent to an affirmance and has no precedential value (see Matter of Marchant v Mead-Morrison Mfg. Co., 252 NY 284, 297-298 [1929, Cardozo, Ch.J.]).