Case Name: Gussie MINUS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dak AMERICAS, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-04-06
Citations: 125 F. App'x 503
Docket Number: No. 04-2544
Parties: Gussie MINUS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Dak AMERICAS, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before TRAXLER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 125
Pages: 503–504

Head Matter:
Gussie MINUS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Dak AMERICAS, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 04-2544.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 2, 2005.
Decided April 6, 2005.
Gussie Minus, Appellant pro se.
Stacy Kaplan Wood, Parker, Poe, Adams & Bernstein, L.L.P., Charlotte, North Carolina; James Walker Coleman, IV, Parker, Poe, Adams & Bernstein, L.L.P., Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before TRAXLER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Gussie Minus appeals the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge recommending summary judgment in favor of DAK Americas in Minus' employment discrimination action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The report and recommendation from which Minus appeals does not constitute an order over which this court may exercise jurisdiction. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We deny all pending motions and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED