Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Dwayne K. DUCKETT, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-11-13
Citations: 383 S.W.3d 491
Docket Number: No. ED 97722
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Dwayne K. DUCKETT, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and LISA S. VAN AMBURG, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 383
Pages: 491–492

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Dwayne K. DUCKETT, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 97722.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Nov. 13, 2012.
Timothy J. Forneris, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Todd T. Smith, LLM, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and LISA S. VAN AMBURG, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Dwayne K. Duckett (Defendant) appeals from the judgment upon his conviction by a jury for one count of second-degree burglary, in violation of Section 569.170, RSMo 2000 ; one count of assault of a law enforcement officer in the third degree, in violation of Section 565.082; and one count of resisting or interfering with arrest, in violation of Section 575.150, for which Defendant was sentenced as a prior felon to a total of twelve-years' imprisonment. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
. Unless otherwise indicated, all further statutory references are to RSMo 2000.