Case Name: Laurie E. TRUMBULL, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Lynn R. MOORE and Michael A. Foran, Defendants/Appellants
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-08-19
Citations: 113 S.W.3d 250
Docket Number: No. ED 81957
Parties: Laurie E. TRUMBULL, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Lynn R. MOORE and Michael A. Foran, Defendants/Appellants.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., and MARY R. RUSSELL, J, and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 113
Pages: 250–250

Head Matter:
Laurie E. TRUMBULL, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Lynn R. MOORE and Michael A. Foran, Defendants/Appellants.
No. ED 81957.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Aug. 19, 2003.
James J. Leightner, Gerard Diekman, Diekman & Leightner, Clayton, MO, for appellant.
Timothy P. O’Mara, Bartley Goffstein, L.L.C., St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., and MARY R. RUSSELL, J, and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendants Lynn R. Moore (Moore) and Michael A. Foran (Foran) appeal the trial court's judgment entered after a jury verdict finding in favor of Plaintiff Laurie E. Trumbull (Trumbull). The jury returned verdicts in favor of Trumbull in the amount of $13,300 on Count I of Trumbull's petition, $100,000 on Count II, and $28,500 on Count III of Trumbull's petition for breach of contract, and returned verdicts in favor of Trumbull on both counts of Foran's counterclaim.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).