Case Name: Brian Barry, Respondent, v. City of New York, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2001-05-22
Citations: 283 A.D.2d 300
Docket Number: 
Parties: Brian Barry, Respondent, v City of New York, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 283
Pages: 300–301

Head Matter:
Brian Barry, Respondent, v City of New York, Appellant.
[724 NYS2d 613]

Opinion:
—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Arber, J., and a jury on liability; Louise Gruner Gans, J., and a jury on damages), entered April 10, 2000, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, finding defendant 100% at fault, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The verdict is fairly supported by evidence that, for unex plained reasons, the City vehicle that was in front of the tow truck that was in front of plaintiff either stopped suddenly or failed to give a proper signal that it was already stopped, setting in motion a chain of events culminating in plaintiff's motorcycle sliding into the rear of the tow truck after he hit a raised crack in the roadway and lost control of his brakes (see, Niemiec v Jones, 237 AD2d 267; Edwards v Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth., 252 AD2d 410, 412; Cruz v City of New York, 218 AD2d 546, 548-549). We have considered defendant's other arguments, including that under no fair interpretation of the evidence could plaintiff be found completely free of fault, and find them unavailing (cf., Berry v Metropolitan Transp. Auth., 256 AD2d 271). Concur — Williams, J. P., Ellerin, Lerner, Saxe and Buckley, JJ.