Case Name: Somchai NOONSAB, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NC GOVERNMENT; W. Brown; Stephen M. Russell, Sr.; Melanie A. Shekita; Magistrate E. Ray Briggs; Paul G. Gessner; Michael G. Howell; Paul C. Ridewoy; Daniel Horn, Clerk of Court; Terri Stewart; Roy Cooper; Mr. Hockey; Christina Cameron Roedeo; Government Officials and More Law Enforcement Officers, Lawyers and Judges in Said Cases, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-10-18
Citations: 669 F. App'x 664
Docket Number: No. 16-7005
Parties: Somchai NOONSAB, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NC GOVERNMENT; W. Brown; Stephen M. Russell, Sr.; Melanie A. Shekita; Magistrate E. Ray Briggs; Paul G. Gessner; Michael G. Howell; Paul C. Ridewoy; Daniel Horn, Clerk of Court; Terri Stewart; Roy Cooper; Mr. Hockey; Christina Cameron Roedeo; Government Officials and More Law Enforcement Officers, Lawyers and Judges in Said Cases, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 669
Pages: 664–665

Head Matter:
Somchai NOONSAB, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NC GOVERNMENT; W. Brown; Stephen M. Russell, Sr.; Melanie A. Shekita; Magistrate E. Ray Briggs; Paul G. Gessner; Michael G. Howell; Paul C. Ridewoy; Daniel Horn, Clerk of Court; Terri Stewart; Roy Cooper; Mr. Hockey; Christina Cameron Roedeo; Government Officials and More Law Enforcement Officers, Lawyers and Judges in Said Cases, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-7005
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: October 13, 2016
Decided: October 18, 2016
Somchai Noonsab, Appellant Pro Se,
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Somchai Noonsab appeals the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint as duplicative. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Noonsab v. NC Gov't, No. 5:16-cfc-08122-FL (E.D.N.C. July 8, 2016). We deny Noonsab's motion for a certificate of appealability as unnecessary. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
We conclude this is a final appealable order because Noonsab may not amend his complaint to cure the defect. See Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc'y, Inc., 807 F.3d 619, 629-30 (4th Cir. 2015) (holding that dismissal without prejudice is not appealable unless "the district court's grounds for dismissal clearly indicate that no amendment could cure the complaint's defects'').