Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bernard MIDDLETON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-07-18
Citations: 40 F. App'x 831
Docket Number: No. 01-7780
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bernard MIDDLETON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 40
Pages: 831–831

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bernard MIDDLETON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 01-7780.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted June 11, 2002.
Decided July 18, 2002.
Bernard Middleton, Appellant Pro Se. James L. Trump, Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Bernard Middleton seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Middleton, Nos. CR-92-348-A; CA-96-1097-AM (E.D.Va. Sept. 27, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.