Case Name: Benjamin K. QUARMON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jeffrey DILLMAN, Warden, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-11-24
Citations: 623 F. App'x 91
Docket Number: No. 15-7261
Parties: Benjamin K. QUARMON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jeffrey DILLMAN, Warden, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 623
Pages: 91–92

Head Matter:
Benjamin K. QUARMON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jeffrey DILLMAN, Warden, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 15-7261.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 19, 2015.
Decided: Nov. 24, 2015.
Benjamin K. Quarmon, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Benjamin K Quarmon seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) civil rights action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-47, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). Because the deficiencies identified by the district court may be remedied by the filing of an amended complaint, we conclude that the order Quarmon seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir.1993).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.