Case Name: SEABREEZE MANOR VERANDAH, INC., etc., Appellant, v. DOMINION INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD., Appellee; SEABREEZE MANOR VERANDAH, INC., etc., Appellant, v. PROVIDENCE WASHINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee; SEABREEZE MANOR VERANDAH, INC., etc., Appellant, v. HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee; SEABREEZE MANOR VERANDAH, INC., etc., Appellant, v. JEFFERSON INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, Appellee; SEABREEZE MANOR VERANDAH, INC., etc., Appellant, v. INTERSTATE FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1973-08-14
Citations: 281 So. 2d 568
Docket Number: Nos. Q-300 to Q-303, and Q-310
Parties: SEABREEZE MANOR VERANDAH, INC., etc., Appellant, v. DOMINION INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD., Appellee. SEABREEZE MANOR VERANDAH, INC., etc., Appellant, v. PROVIDENCE WASHINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee. SEABREEZE MANOR VERANDAH, INC., etc., Appellant, v. HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee. SEABREEZE MANOR VERANDAH, INC., etc., Appellant, v. JEFFERSON INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, Appellee. SEABREEZE MANOR VERANDAH, INC., etc., Appellant, v. INTERSTATE FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellee.
Judges: WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 281
Pages: 568–569

Head Matter:
SEABREEZE MANOR VERANDAH, INC., etc., Appellant, v. DOMINION INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD., Appellee. SEABREEZE MANOR VERANDAH, INC., etc., Appellant, v. PROVIDENCE WASHINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee. SEABREEZE MANOR VERANDAH, INC., etc., Appellant, v. HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee. SEABREEZE MANOR VERANDAH, INC., etc., Appellant, v. JEFFERSON INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, Appellee. SEABREEZE MANOR VERANDAH, INC., etc., Appellant, v. INTERSTATE FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellee.
Nos. Q-300 to Q-303, and Q-310.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Aug. 14, 1973.
Rehearing Denied Sept. 13, 1973.
Edward I. Matz, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Raymond A. Haas and Cliff B. Gosney, Jr., of Gosney, Hutcheson & Haas, Daytona Beach, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The records on appeal, briefs, and oral arguments herein having been fully considered, and it appearing therefrom that appellant has failed to demonstrate that the judgments appealed are erroneous, the said judgments are therefore Affirmed.
WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.