Case Name: Thomas Joe MILLER-EL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Doug DRETKE, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-07-25
Citations: 142 F. App'x 802
Docket Number: No. 00-10784
Parties: Thomas Joe MILLER-EL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Doug DRETKE, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before DAVIS, JONES, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 142
Pages: 802–803

Head Matter:
Thomas Joe MILLER-EL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Doug DRETKE, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 00-10784.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Decided July 25, 2005.
James William Marcus, Houston, TX, Andrew A. Hammel, San Antonio, TX, for Petitioner-Appellant.
Ann Kraatz, Gena Blount Bunn, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General for the State of Texas, Austin, TX, for Respondent-Appellee.
Before DAVIS, JONES, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
PER CURIAM:
Pursuant to the mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States, see Miller-El v. Dretke, — U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 2817, — L.Ed.2d - (Jun. 13, 2005), the above styled and numbered petition is remanded to the district court with instructions that an order be entered: (1) granting the petition for writ of habeas corpus; (2) setting aside Petitioner's conviction and sentence for capital murder; (3) ordering the release of Petitioner from custody unless the State grants Petitioner a new trial within 120 days from the date of the entry of the district court's order; and (4) entering final judgment for Petitioner.
REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.