Case Name: Max Schwartz, Appellant, v. Jacob Boshnack and Others, Individually and as Copartners, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Brooklyn Overall Co., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1931-07
Citations: 234 A.D. 621
Docket Number: 
Parties: Max Schwartz, Appellant, v. Jacob Boshnack and Others, Individually and as Copartners, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Brooklyn Overall Co., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 234
Pages: 621–621

Head Matter:
Max Schwartz, Appellant, v. Jacob Boshnack and Others, Individually and as Copartners, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Brooklyn Overall Co., Respondents.

Opinion:
Order dismissing complaint reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, with leave to defendants to answer within ten days from service of a copy of the order herein. We are of opinion that the complaint states a cause of action for malicious prosecution. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur; Scudder, J., not voting.