Case Name: GENERAL DISTRIBUTOR CORPORATION, Appellant, v. CURTISS NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI SPRINGS, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1970-10-27
Citations: 240 So. 2d 321
Docket Number: No. 69-1071
Parties: GENERAL DISTRIBUTOR CORPORATION, Appellant, v. CURTISS NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI SPRINGS, Appellee.
Judges: Before PEARSON, C. J., and HEN-DRY and SWANN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 240
Pages: 321–321

Head Matter:
GENERAL DISTRIBUTOR CORPORATION, Appellant, v. CURTISS NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI SPRINGS, Appellee.
No. 69-1071.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 27, 1970.
Rehearing Denied Nov. 18, 1970.
Jerry Larotonda, Miami, for appellant.
Broad & Cassel, and Lewis Horwitz, Miami Beach, for appellee.
Before PEARSON, C. J., and HEN-DRY and SWANN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellant sued the appellee alleging a conversion of personal property. This appeal is from a final judgment for the defendant. The judgment was entered after a trial before the court sitting without a jury. The only point presented on this appeal is simply that the trial judge made a wrong determination upon the facts. We affirm the judgment upon the rule that where the judgment is reasonably supported by facts in the record, an appellate court will not substitute its judgment for that of the trial court. Old Equity Life Ins. Co. v. Levenson, Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 50.
Affirmed.