Case Name: Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Texas
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1916-04-24
Citations: 241 U.S. 650
Docket Number: No. 188
Parties: Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Texas.
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 241
Pages: 650–651

Head Matter:
No. 188.
Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Texas.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Texas.
Argued April 17 and 18, 1916.
Decided April 24, 1916.
Mr. Herbert S.- Garrett, Mr. Robert Lynn Batts and Mr. John A. Eaton for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Benjamin F. Looney and Mr. Frank L. Snodgrass for the defendant in error.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for Want of jurisdiction upon the authority of:
(1) Jones v. Montague, 194 U. S. 147; Richardson v. McChesney, 218 U. S. 487; Stearns v. Wood, 236 U. S. 75.
(2) Kansas City Star Co. v. Julian, 215 U. S. 589; Forbes v. State Council of Virginia, 216 U. S. 396-399; St. Louis & San Francisco Railway v. Shepherd, 240 U. S. 240.
(3) Henkel v. Cincinnati, 177 U. S. 170; Fullerton v. Texas, 196 U. S. 192, 194; Allen v. Arguimbau, 198 U. S. 149, 156; Cleveland & Pittsburgh R. R. v. Cleveland, 235 U. S. 50, 55.
(4) Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Parker v. McLain, 237 U. S. 469, 471. See Pinney v. Nelson, 183 U. S. 144, 147; Abilene National Bank v. Dolley, 228 U. S. 1, 5; Lake Shore & Michigan So. Ry. v. Ohio, 173 U. S. 285, 289, et seq.; Cincinnati, Indianapolis & W. Ry. v. Connersville, 218 U. S. 336; Missouri Pacific Railway v. Kansas, 216 U. S. 262, 283 et seq.