Case Name: Cheryl Kaye COWLEY, Petitioner/Respondent, v. William George COWLEY, Respondent/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-07-22
Citations: 116 S.W.3d 615
Docket Number: No. ED 80972
Parties: Cheryl Kaye COWLEY, Petitioner/Respondent, v. William George COWLEY, Respondent/Appellant.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR. and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 116
Pages: 615–616

Head Matter:
Cheryl Kaye COWLEY, Petitioner/Respondent, v. William George COWLEY, Respondent/Appellant.
No. ED 80972.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
July 22, 2003.
Robert F. Summers, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Margo L. Green, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., WILLLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR. and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The husband, William Cowley, appeals the trial court's dissolution judgment that awarded him 58 percent of the marital property, and 42 percent to the wife, Cheryl Cowley. The husband argues that the trial court erred in improperly considering the factors set forth in Section 452.330 RSMo 2000, and therefore an inequitable division of the marital property resulted. We affirm.
We have reviewed the parties' briefs and the record on appeal. An opinion reciting detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).