Case Name: OTTO J. CIANCIOTTO AND RUTH CIANCIOTTO, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. SIDNEY MILSTEIN AND MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF CLOSTER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1975-02-18
Citations: 66 N.J. 581
Docket Number: 
Parties: OTTO J. CIANCIOTTO AND RUTH CIANCIOTTO, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. SIDNEY MILSTEIN AND MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF CLOSTER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 66
Pages: 581–581

Head Matter:
OTTO J. CIANCIOTTO AND RUTH CIANCIOTTO, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. SIDNEY MILSTEIN AND MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF CLOSTER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Argued February 4, 1975
Decided February 18, 1975.
Mr. Anthony D. Andora, argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Andora, Palmisano and De Cotiis, attorneys).
Mr. Edward J. Cahill, argued the cause for respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division in its majority opinion, 132 N. J. Super. 83.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Hughes, Justices Jacobs, Mountain, Sullivan, Pashman and Clifford and Judge Kolovsky — 7.
For reversal — None.