Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Isaias Alvarenga VASQUEZ, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-08-14
Citations: 189 F. App'x 589
Docket Number: No. 05-3101
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Isaias Alvarenga VASQUEZ, Appellant.
Judges: Before SMITH, MAGILL, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 189
Pages: 589–590

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Isaias Alvarenga VASQUEZ, Appellant.
No. 05-3101.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 9, 2006.
Decided: Aug. 14, 2006.
Kandice A. Wilcox, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Cedar Rapids, LA, for Appellee.
Stephen A. Swift, Klinger & Robinson, Cedar Rapids, IA, for Appellant. Isaías Alvarenga Vasquez, White Deer, PA, pro se.
Before SMITH, MAGILL, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Isaías Alvarenga Vasquez pleaded guilty to illegally reentering the United States after having been deported following a conviction in Iowa for reckless use of a firearm. Ruling that the Iowa conviction was an aggravated felony, the district court sentenced Vasquez to 24 months in prison and 2 years of supervised release. See 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b)(2).
On appeal, Vasquez's counsel argues a prior sentence Vasquez received for a marijuana-possession conviction should not have counted in the criminal history calculation, because that offense conduct was related to the instant offense as both offenses occurred at the same time and in the same place. We disagree. The offenses were severable and distinct, and the only connection between the marijuana possession and the illegal reentry was that the former led to his arrest for the latter. See United States v. Troncoso, 23 F.3d 612, 616-17 (1st Cir.1994) (district court did not err in counting prior drug-offense sentence in criminal history for illegal-reentry conviction, because offenses were severable and distinct; only connection between drug-sales conduct and immigration-offense conduct was that drug-sales conduct "set in motion a chain of events" resulting in discovery of defendant's illegal immigration status).
Counsel also argues, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), that Vasquez's prior conviction for reckless use of a firearm was not an aggravated felony, and thus the court erred in imposing an 8-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(C). Again, we disagree. The Iowa offense of reckless use of a firearm is punishable by up to 2 years in prison, see Iowa Code § 724.30 (2003), 903.1 (2003), and the offense conduct creates a substantial risk of injury, see United States v. Smith, 422 F.3d 715, 722-23 (8th Cir.2005). See 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43), 18 U.S.C. § 16, U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2, comment. (n.3) (defining aggravated felony).
Having reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we conclude there are no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm.
. The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa.