Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jermonza Levon SPENCER, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-03-03
Citations: 314 F. App'x 610
Docket Number: No. 08-6516
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jermonza Levon SPENCER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 314
Pages: 610–611

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jermonza Levon SPENCER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-6516.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 26, 2009.
Decided: March 3, 2009.
Jermonza Levon Spencer, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Barrett Hudson, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jermonza Levon Spencer appeals from the district court's order denying his motion to vacate the court's order granting a two-level sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). Spencer argues that the district court erred by not conducting a full resentencing. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Spencer, No. 3:97-cr-00082-jct-2 (W.D.Va. Apr. 8, 2008); see United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247, 257 (4th Cir.2009) ("When a sentence is within the guidelines applicable at the time of the original sentencing, in an 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) resentencing hearing, a district judge is not authorized to reduce a defendant's sentence below the amended guideline range."). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.