Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Manuel PEREZ-CANO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-12-05
Citations: 256 F. App'x 728
Docket Number: No. 07-10572
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Manuel PEREZ-CANO, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 256
Pages: 728–729

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Manuel PEREZ-CANO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-10572.
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 5, 2007.
Denise B. Williams, U.S. Attorney’s Office Northern District of Texas, Lubbock, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Sherylynn Ann Kime-Goodwin, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Northern District of Texas, Lubbock, TX, for Defendant Appellant.
Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Manuel Perez-Cano raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 528 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir.2007), cert. denied — U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 872, 169 L.Ed.2d 737 (2007). The Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.