Case Name: FIRST INDUSTRIAL LOAN COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. HARRY ROSENHAND, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1935-05-24
Citations: 115 N.J.L. 252
Docket Number: 
Parties: FIRST INDUSTRIAL LOAN COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. HARRY ROSENHAND, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 115
Pages: 252–252

Head Matter:
FIRST INDUSTRIAL LOAN COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. HARRY ROSENHAND, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Argued May 23, 1935
Decided May 24, 1935.
For the defendant-appellant, Herman L. Fast.
For the plaintiff-respondent, Charles Blume.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment appealed from is affirmed. Where a co-maker places his signature upon a note at a place other than the place where a small loan business is being conducted that circumstance does not void the instrument under chapter 62 of Pamph. L. 1932. N. J. Stat. Annual 1932, p. 48, § 35-22.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.