Case Name: George W. CARLISLE, Jr., Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. PETERS, HR Department, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-01-07
Citations: 306 F. App'x 326
Docket Number: No. 07-2849
Parties: George W. CARLISLE, Jr., Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. PETERS, HR Department, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 306
Pages: 326–326

Head Matter:
George W. CARLISLE, Jr., Appellant, v. CITY OF ST. PETERS, HR Department, Appellee.
No. 07-2849.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 23, 2008.
Filed: Jan. 7, 2009.
George W. Carlisle Jr., St. Peters, MO, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Amy R. Brown, James N. Foster Jr., McMahon & Berger, St. Louis, MO, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before MURPHY, BYE, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
George W. Carlisle, Jr., appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment in his employment-discrimination action. Upon careful de novo review, see Jacob-Mua v. Veneman, 289 F.3d 517, 520 (8th Cir.2002), we conclude that summary judgment was properly granted for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Henry E. Autrey, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.