Case Name: PEOPLE OF STATE OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HANLEY MILLING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1941-10-17
Citations: 123 F.2d 819
Docket Number: No. 8689
Parties: PEOPLE OF STATE OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HANLEY MILLING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before HICKS, SIMONS, and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 123
Pages: 819–819

Head Matter:
PEOPLE OF STATE OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HANLEY MILLING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 8689.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Oct. 17, 1941.
John J. Bennett, Jr., and Hugh Reilly, both of Albany, N. Y., and Jack B. Dworken, of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellant.
John C. O’Donnell and C. H. Henkel, both of Mansfield, Ohio, for appellee.
Before HICKS, SIMONS, and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the briefs and argument in the above-entitled cause, it is ordered that the judgment be, and it is hereby, affirmed for the reasons assigned in the opinion of the District Judge, 41 F.Supp. 844.