Case Name: Marcus GANZIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Warden PONTON; Investigator Moicjek; Counselor Jackson; Grievance Coordinator N., Mathews; E.B.P. Manager M. Davis, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-10-19
Citations: 619 F. App'x 260
Docket Number: No. 15-6853
Parties: Marcus GANZIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Warden PONTON; Investigator Moicjek; Counselor Jackson; Grievance Coordinator N., Mathews; E.B.P. Manager M. Davis, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 619
Pages: 260–261

Head Matter:
Marcus GANZIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Warden PONTON; Investigator Moicjek; Counselor Jackson; Grievance Coordinator N., Mathews; E.B.P. Manager M. Davis, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15-6853.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 15, 2015.
Decided: Oct. 19, 2015.
Marcus Ganzie, Appellant Pro Se, Margaret Ho.ehl O’Shea, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Marcus Ganzie appeals the district court's judgment granting the Defendants' motion to dismiss and dismissing his civil rights complaint for failing to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ganzie v. Warden Ponton, No. 2:14-cv-00350-RBS-DEM (E.D.Va., May 19, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.