Case Name: In the Matter of the Estate of Leo R. Harkness, Deceased. Carl Rumolt, Appellant; Kate E. Munty, as Administratrix of the Estate of Leo R. Harkness, Deceased, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1951-10-05
Citations: 279 A.D. 622
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Estate of Leo R. Harkness, Deceased. Carl Rumolt, Appellant; Kate E. Munty, as Administratrix of the Estate of Leo R. Harkness, Deceased, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 279
Pages: 622–622

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Estate of Leo R. Harkness, Deceased. Carl Rumolt, Appellant; Kate E. Munty, as Administratrix of the Estate of Leo R. Harkness, Deceased, Respondent.

Opinion:
Memorandum: We think the claimant failed to establish his claim against,the estate. We are unable to understand the decision of the Acting Surrogate allowing the claim in the amount of $1,080 as we find no evidence to support such a finding. However, as the administratrix has not appealed from the decree, this court can do nothing but affirm. All concur. (Appeal from a decree disallowing a claim against an estate for money due as share of partnership.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Vaughan, Piper and Wheeler, JJ.