Case Name: TUCKER v. THE STATE
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1922-11-15
Citations: 29 Ga. App. 221
Docket Number: 13858
Parties: TUCKER v. THE STATE.
Judges: Luhe, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., dissents.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 29
Pages: 221–222

Head Matter:
13858.
TUCKER v. THE STATE.
Decided November 15, 1922.
Luhe, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., dissents.
Indictment for larceny from house; from Fulton superior court — Judge Humphries. July 1, 1922.
Arthur W. Powell, for plaintiff in error.
John A. Boylcin, solicitor-general, B. A. Stephens, contra.

Opinion:
Bloodworth, J.,
dissenting. I think that the evidence is ample to support a verdict of simple larcency, but do not think that it shows beyond a reasonable doubt that the ring was ever in the house from which it is alleged to have been stolen.