Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Moises ALVAREZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-03-17
Citations: 58 F. App'x 735
Docket Number: No. 01-50599; D.C. No. CR-00-00032-RT-01
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Moises ALVAREZ, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 58
Pages: 735–736

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Moises ALVAREZ, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 01-50599.
D.C. No. CR-00-00032-RT-01.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 10, 2003.
Decided March 17, 2003.
Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Moisés Alvarez appeals his conviction by guilty plea and 120-month sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute more than 500 grams of cocaine, and possession with intent to distribute more than 500 grams of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Alvarez's counsel has submitted a brief stating that there are no meritorious issues for review. Appellant has not filed a supplemental pro se brief.
Our independent review of the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346,102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no issues requiring further review. Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.