Case Name: Nellie YANCEY, Administratrix of the Estate of Thomas J. Yancey, Jr., Deceased (plaintiff), v. UNITED STATES of America (defendant), Appellant, v. I. ALPER CO. (Third-Party Defendant); Nellie YANCEY, Administratrix of the Estate of Thomas J. Yancey, Jr., Deceased (plaintiff), v. UNITED STATES of America (defendant), v. I. ALPER CO. (Third-Party Defendant), Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1963-07-17
Citations: 323 F.2d 544
Docket Number: Nos. 14275, 14276
Parties: Nellie YANCEY, Administratrix of the Estate of Thomas J. Yancey, Jr., Deceased (plaintiff), v. UNITED STATES of America (defendant), Appellant, v. I. ALPER CO. (Third-Party Defendant). Nellie YANCEY, Administratrix of the Estate of Thomas J. Yancey, Jr., Deceased (plaintiff), v. UNITED STATES of America (defendant), v. I. ALPER CO. (Third-Party Defendant), Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 323
Pages: 544–544

Head Matter:
Nellie YANCEY, Administratrix of the Estate of Thomas J. Yancey, Jr., Deceased (plaintiff), v. UNITED STATES of America (defendant), Appellant, v. I. ALPER CO. (Third-Party Defendant). Nellie YANCEY, Administratrix of the Estate of Thomas J. Yancey, Jr., Deceased (plaintiff), v. UNITED STATES of America (defendant), v. I. ALPER CO. (Third-Party Defendant), Appellant.
Nos. 14275, 14276.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued June 5, 1963.
Decided July 17, 1963.
Rehearing Denied Sept. 11, 1963.
Edward Berlin, Dept, of Justice, "Washington, D. C. (John W. Douglas, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Drew J. T. O’Keefe, U. S. Atty., Sherman L. Cohn, Attys. Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., -on the brief), for the United States.
James J. McCabe, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa. (John M. Ross, Duane, Morris & Heckscher, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for I. Alper Co.
Joseph D. Shein, Philadelphia, Pa. (Shein & Berlant, Philadelphia, Pa., on the .brief),, for appellee.
Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and MCLAUGHLIN and GANEY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have examined the record in this case and have weighed carefully the arguments of the parties. We can find no substantial error in the proceedings and consequently the judgment and order appealed from will be affirmed.