Case Name: Raul RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-07-10
Citations: 820 So. 2d 1051
Docket Number: No. 3D01-3080
Parties: Raul RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before GREEN, SORONDO, and RAMIREZ, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 820
Pages: 1051–1052

Head Matter:
Raul RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D01-3080.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 10, 2002.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Robfert Kalter, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. B’utterworth, Attorney General, and Richard L. .Polin, Assistant Attorney General, and Esperanza Marie Tilgh-man, Certified Legal Intern, for appellee.
Before GREEN, SORONDO, and RAMIREZ, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
As we conclude that the evidence adduced at the probation revocation hearing was sufficient to support the trial court's revocation of the appellant's probation according to its oral pronouncements, we affirm the same. We do, however, remand for the trial court to enter a written order consistent with its oral pronouncements. See Cifuentes v. State, 717 So.2d 136 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Taramona v. State, 707 So.2d 1194 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).
Affirmed as modified.