Case Name: The STATE of Ohio, v. CALDWELL
Court: Circleville Municipal Court
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2008-12-08
Citations: 150 Ohio Misc. 2d 42
Docket Number: No. TRD0807415
Parties: The STATE of Ohio, v. CALDWELL.
Judges: 
Reporter: Ohio Miscellaneous Reports, Second Series
Volume: 150
Pages: 42–43

Head Matter:
The STATE of Ohio, v. CALDWELL.
2008-Ohio-7137.]
Circleville Municipal Court.
No. TRD0807415.
Decided Dec. 8, 2008.
Gary D. Kenworthy, Circleville City Law Director, for plaintiff.
Anthony W. Caldwell, pro se.

Opinion:
Dumm, Judge.
{¶ 1} The above captioned matter was tried to the court on December 8, 2008. The court heard the testimony of Dick McCreary of Ohio Calibration Laboratories, who was duly qualified as an expert witness in the operation of the K-55, the Python, the Python II, and the Python III radar speed detectors.
{¶ 2} Based upon the testimony presented and the exhibits admitted at trial, the court found the defendant guilty of the charge of speeding, 65 in a 55 zone, and sentenced him accordingly.
{¶ 3} This trial was the first opportunity the court had to hear testimony regarding the scientific principles that support the use of the K-55, the Python, the Python II, and the Python III as radar devices to measure speed. Based upon the testimony and evidence presented, the court makes the following findings of fact regarding the use of the radar speed detectors.
{¶ 4} The radar speed detector is reliable and accurate as a scientific measure of the speed of a moving object and can be used by law-enforcement personnel to measure vehicle speed, provided that the device is used in accordance with certain procedures delineated by the manufacturer. Specifically, the court finds that the following procedures must be employed in order for the radar speed device to accurately measure a vehicle's speed:
(a) the radar must be in proper working order; (b) the radar must be properly checked for accuracy prior to use. Said check should include a self-test done by the instrument internally; an accuracy check with tuning forks; and a calibration check at the beginning of the officer's working shift and again at the conclusion of the officers shift; (c) the officer must be trained in the operation of the radar device.
{¶ 5} As a matter of fact, if all the above listed conditions and procedures are applied, the court finds that the K-55, the Python, the Python II, and the Python III radar speed detectors are an accurate and scientifically reliable measure of speed with a margin of error within minus two to plus two miles per hour in the moving mode and one to plus one miles per hour in the stationary mode of the actual speed of the object.
So ordered.