Case Name: Donald CAPLAN, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. ST. LOUIS AVIATION MUSEUM, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-08-09
Citations: 168 S.W.3d 727
Docket Number: No. ED 85220
Parties: Donald CAPLAN, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. ST. LOUIS AVIATION MUSEUM, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J. and MARY K. HOFF, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 168
Pages: 727–727

Head Matter:
Donald CAPLAN, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. ST. LOUIS AVIATION MUSEUM, Defendant/Respondent.
No. ED 85220.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Aug. 9, 2005.
Danna McKitrick, P.C., Michael J. McKitrick and Eric C. Mueller, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Paule, Camazine & Blumenthal, P.C., Peter A. Gianino, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J. and MARY K. HOFF, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Donald Caplan (Caplan) and the Nikki Caplan Memorial Fund Committee (Committee) appeals from the trial court's judgment in favor of the St. Louis Aviation Museum on Caplan's and Committee's petition requesting accounting, injunction, and specific performance.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
The parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).