Case Name: Best Adoption Case
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1964-01-07
Citations: 413 Pa. 253
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 124
Parties: Best Adoption Case.
Judges: Before Jones, Cohen, O’Brien and Roberts, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 413
Pages: 253–254

Head Matter:
Best Adoption Case.
Argued November 19, 1963.
January 7, 1964:
Before Jones, Cohen, O’Brien and Roberts, JJ.
Horace A. Davenport, for appellants.
Charles W. Bowser, for appellee.

Opinion:
Opinion
Per Curiam,
The maternal grandparents of the five year old female child of their deceased daughter petitioned the Orphans' Court of Montgomery County for her adoption, alleging that the natural father had abandoned his daughter. The father appeared and opposed the adoption. The court below found that the child's father did not abandon her, refused to decree adoption, dismissed the petition, and awarded custody to the father.
On this appeal, the sole issue is the propriety of the factual finding by the orphans' court that the evidence failed to support a conclusion of abandonment on the part of the father. Conduct of a parent which consti tutes abandonment is defined in our Adoption Act, April 4, 1925, P. L. 127, as amended, 1 P.8. §1-7, and has been construed and discussed in many decisions by this Court, the most recent being Smith Adoption Case, 412 Pa. 501, 194 A. 2d 919 (1963). It would serve no useful purpose here to repeat the frequently declared and prevailing principles governing abandonment.
We have carefully reviewed the extended record in the light of the controlling authorities and we conclude — as the court below correctly did — that the instant record does not supply sufficient proof to establish that the father abandoned his daughter for a period of at least six months. In the absence of clear proof of abandonment, the court below was entirely justified in refusing to enter a decree which would terminate forever the natural parent-child relationship. Our examination of the record fails to disclose any basis for disturbing the action of the court below.
The decree of the court below, refusing the adoption and dismissing the petition, is affirmed. Each party to pay own costs.