Case Name: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lash
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1994-01-06
Citations: 68 Ohio St. 3d 1213
Docket Number: No. 93-1335
Parties: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lash.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas,- Wright, Rbsnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 68
Pages: 1213–1214

Head Matter:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lash.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Lash (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 1213.]
(No. 93-1335
Submitted and decided January 6, 1994.)

Opinion:
On Application for Reinstatement.
This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, David Lindsay Lash, Attorney Registration No. 0031571, last known business address in Beachwood, Ohio.
The court coming now to consider its order of December 8, 1993, suspending respondent, David Lindsay Lash, from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of one year, with the suspension to have begun on February 19, 1992, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that David Lindsay Lash be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1).
For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Lash (1993), 68 Ohio St.3d 12, 623 N.E.2d 28.
Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas,- Wright, Rbsnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.