Case Name: LUFF v. STATE
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1927-02-09
Citations: 5 Ohio Law Abs. 173
Docket Number: No. 20315
Parties: LUFF v. STATE
Judges: 
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 5
Pages: 173–173

Head Matter:
LUFF v. STATE
No. 20315.
Supreme Court
Dock. Feb. 9, 1927,
5 Abs. 105.
Attorneys — Day & Day for Luff; E. C. Stanton for State; all of Cleveland.

Opinion:
Luff contends in the Supreme Court, that it is immaterial, that a former proceeding in error was affirmed and remanded for re-sentence, by the Supreme Court, and that when error is again presented, it makes no difference that Court of Appeals has passed on assignment of error, and fact that Appeals Court refuses to review because of no authority to do so, is not well taken.