Case Name: Keco Industries, Inc.
Court: United States Court of Claims
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1966-01-17
Citations: 174 Ct. Cl. 1270
Docket Number: No. 355-63
Parties: Keco Industries, Inc.
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Court of Claims Reports
Volume: 174
Pages: 1270–1271

Head Matter:
No. 355-63.
January 17, 1966
Keco Industries, Inc.

Opinion:
Contracts; damages; measwre of damages; legal fees.— Plaintiff sues to recover the expense incurred in prosecuting an appeal to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals, which expense plaintiff contends should have been included in the equitable adjustment. The expenses included attorneys fees, travel, and compensation for expert witnesses. The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment, defendant contending that the cost of preparing and presenting a claim to obtain contract relief administratively is not recoverable by the contractor in the Court of Claims. Upon consideration of the motions and without oral argument, the court concluded on the basis of Ramsey v. United States, 121 Ct. Cl. 426, 101 F. Supp. 353 (1951); Marshall v. United States, 143 Ct. Cl. 51, 164 F. Supp. 221 (1958); and Oliver-Finnie Co. v. United States, 150 Ct. Cl. 189, 279 F. 2d 498 (1960); (see also Appeal of Adrian L. Robinson, ASBCA No. 6248, 61-1 BCA ¶ 2857, p. 14,918 (Nov. 12,1960); Appeal of Floors, Inc., ASBCA No. 5469, 61 BCA ¶ 2856, p. 14, 906 (Nov. 2, 1960); Appeal of Remler Co., Ltd., ASBCA No. 5354, 59-1 BOA ¶ 2264, p. 10, 076 (June 30,1959); Appeal of Lake Union Drydock Co., ASBCA No. 3073, 59-1 BCA ¶ 2229, p. 9792 (June 8, 1959), that plaintiff is not entitled to recover. On January 17, 1966, the court ordered that defendant's motion for summary judgment be granted and the petition was dismissed.