Case Name: COMMONWEALTH PROPERTY ADVOCATES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee for the Adjustable Rate Mortgage-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-2, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-03-06
Citations: 459 F. App'x 770
Docket Number: No. 11-4168
Parties: COMMONWEALTH PROPERTY ADVOCATES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee for the Adjustable Rate Mortgage-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-2, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before LUCERO, HARTZ, and O’BRIEN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 459
Pages: 770–771

Head Matter:
COMMONWEALTH PROPERTY ADVOCATES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee for the Adjustable Rate Mortgage-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-2, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 11-4168.
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
March 6, 2012.
E. Craig Smay, Esq., E. Craig Smay P.C., Salt Lake City, UT, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Martin K. Banks, Timothy K. Conde, Timothy M. Considine, Stoel Rives, LLP, Salt Lake City, UT, for Defendants-Appel-lees.
Before LUCERO, HARTZ, and O’BRIEN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER AND JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.
The issues presented in this appeal have been previously decided. Counsel were given an opportunity to distinguish our prior cases but Appellant's counsel used that opportunity to criticize, rather than distinguish, them. There is nothing more to say. AFFIRMED.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R.App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.