Case Name: In the Interest of M.D.J., M.N.J., and M.J., Plaintiffs. R.H.J., Appellant, v. Juvenile Officer, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2007-05-09
Citations: 221 S.W.3d 466
Docket Number: No. WD 67389
Parties: In the Interest of M.D.J., M.N.J., and M.J., Plaintiffs. R.H.J., Appellant, v. Juvenile Officer, Respondent.
Judges: Before HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, Presiding Judge, JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge and LISA WHITE HARDWICK, Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 221
Pages: 466–467

Head Matter:
In the Interest of M.D.J., M.N.J., and M.J., Plaintiffs. R.H.J., Appellant, v. Juvenile Officer, Respondent.
No. WD 67389.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
May 9, 2007.
J. Eric Mitchell, Clinton, MO, for appellant.
James E. Switzer, Clinton, MO, for respondent.
Before HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, Presiding Judge, JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge and LISA WHITE HARDWICK, Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Richard Jack ("Father") appeals a judgment entered in the Circuit Court of Henry County terminating his parental rights to his three children, M.D.J., M.N.J., and M.J. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value, but a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).