Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sixto PENA-ESPARZA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-09-10
Citations: 615 F. App'x 228
Docket Number: No. 14-40537
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sixto PENA-ESPARZA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before DAVIS, JONES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 615
Pages: 228–228

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sixto PENA-ESPARZA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 14-40537
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Sept. 10, 2015.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Eric Joseph Davis, Davis & Associates, P.L.L.C. Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Sixto Pena-Esparza, Post, TX, pro se.
Before DAVIS, JONES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Sixto Pena-Esparza has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief and a supplemental brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Pena-Esparza has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent'except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.