Case Name: John St. DENIS d/b/a Techserv Associates, Inc., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. MALLINCKRODT, INC., Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-03-26
Citations: 71 S.W.3d 242
Docket Number: No. ED 80178
Parties: John St. DENIS d/b/a Techserv Associates, Inc., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. MALLINCKRODT, INC., Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 71
Pages: 242–243

Head Matter:
John St. DENIS d/b/a Techserv Associates, Inc., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. MALLINCKRODT, INC., Defendant/Respondent.
No. ED 80178.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
March 26, 2002.
Reginald Harris, Thompson Coburn LLP., St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.
Blair Kenneth Drazic, Creve Coeur, MO, for Appellant.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
John St. Denis d/b/a Techserv Associates, Inc. (Appellant) appeals from the trial court's Summary Judgment entered in favor of Mallinekrodt, Inc. (Respondent) on Appellant's action for quantum meruit. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, in the light most favorable to the Appellant and giving Appellant the benefit of all reasonable inferences. ITT Commercial Fin. Corp. v. Mid-Am. Marine Supply Corp., 854 S.W.2d 371, 376 (Mo.banc 1993). We find the trial court's entry of Summary Judgment sustainable as a matter of law. Meyer v. Enoch, 807 S.W.2d 156, 158 (Mo.App. E.D.1991). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).