Case Name: Marie Dudley, Appellant, v. Elizabeth B. Vanderpoel, Defendant, and Carroll Whitaker, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1907-11-26
Citations: 190 N.Y. 520
Docket Number: 
Parties: Marie Dudley, Appellant, v. Elizabeth B. Vanderpoel, Defendant, and Carroll Whitaker, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 190
Pages: 520–521

Head Matter:
Marie Dudley, Appellant, v. Elizabeth B. Vanderpoel, Defendant, and Carroll Whitaker, Respondent.
Reported below, 119 App. Div. 928.
(Argued November 18, 1907;
decided November 26, 1907.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial . department, • entered May 29, 1907, which affirmed an order of Special Term imposing terms as a condition to the granting of a motion for substitution of attorneys.
Also motion on the part of appellant for leave to file a new and amended undertaking.
The motion to dismiss was made upon the grounds that the appeal was not taken in time, and that a proper undertaking had not been filed.
■ Gcm'oll Whitaker for motion to dismiss.
Hollín Traey opposed.

Opinion:
Motion to dismiss appeal denied, without costs, and motion for leave to file a new and amended undertaking granted upon payment of ten dollars within ten days.