Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Armand CHAPMAN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-09-05
Citations: 46 F. App'x 160
Docket Number: No. 02-6833
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Armand CHAPMAN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 46
Pages: 160–160

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Armand CHAPMAN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-6833.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 29, 2002.
Decided Sept. 5, 2002.
Armand Chapman, Appellant Pro Se. LeDora Knight, Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Armand Chapman seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and conclude that Chapman has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Chapman, Nos. CR-98-341; CA-01-1892-AM (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 26, 2002 & entered Apr, 29, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.