Case Name: Joseph MURPHY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-03-02
Citations: 539 So. 2d 22
Docket Number: No. 88-750
Parties: Joseph MURPHY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: COWART, DANIEL and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 539
Pages: 22–22

Head Matter:
Joseph MURPHY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 88-750.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
March 2, 1989.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Barbara L. Condon, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Dee R. Ball, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The order imposing costs under sections 960.20 and 27.3455(1), Florida Statutes, without notice or opportunity to be heard, violated appellant's constitutional due process rights and is hereby reversed. See Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984); Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988), and Brooks v. State, 490 So.2d 173 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986). See also Harriet v. State, 520 So.2d 271 (Fla.1988); Hollis v. State, 525 So.2d 498 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Morris v. State, 524 So.2d 494 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Riccard v. State, 514 So.2d 83 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987); Evins v. State, 497 So.2d 1293 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); Gaffney v. State, 497 So.2d 1292 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986), rev. denied, 506 So.2d 1041 (Fla.1987); and Outar v. State, 508 So.2d 1311 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987).
REVERSED.
COWART, DANIEL and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.