Case Name: STATE ex inf. CROW, Attorney-General, v. CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY; STATE ex inf. CROW, Attorney-General, v. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY RAILWAY COMPANY; STATE ex inf. CROW, Attorney-General, v. MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY
Court: Supreme Court of Missouri
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1903-07-03
Citations: 176 Mo. 721
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE ex inf. CROW, Attorney-General, v. CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY; STATE ex inf. CROW, Attorney-General, v. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY RAILWAY COMPANY; STATE ex inf. CROW, Attorney-General, v. MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY.
Judges: All concur.
Reporter: Missouri Reports
Volume: 176
Pages: 721–721

Head Matter:
STATE ex inf. CROW, Attorney-General, v. CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY; STATE ex inf. CROW, Attorney-General, v. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY RAILWAY COMPANY; STATE ex inf. CROW, Attorney-General, v. MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY.
In Banc,
July 3, 1903.
Quo Warranto.
Writs quashed.
Edward G. Grow, Attorney-General, for informant; Frank Hagerman and Adiel Sherwood of counsel.
M. A. Low, W. F. Evans and Frank P. Sebree for Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company respondent; O. M. Spencer and Warner, Dean, McLeod S Holden for Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Company respondent; Martin L. Glardy for Missouri Pacific Railway Company respondent.

Opinion:
BURGESS, J.
These are all companion cases to the ease of the State of Missouri ex informatione Edward C. Crow, Atty.-Genl. v. The Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company, decided at the present term and reported at page 687 of this volume, and for reasons given in the opinion handed down in that case the pleas to the informations are sustained, and in-formations quashed.
All concur.