Case Name: Phong Thanh NGUYEN, Petitioner-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE; Federal Detention Center Seatac; Katrina C. Pflaumer; Janet Reno, Respondents-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-05-22
Citations: 63 F. App'x 992
Docket Number: No. 01-36059
Parties: Phong Thanh NGUYEN, Petitioner—Appellee, v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE; Federal Detention Center Seatac; Katrina C. Pflaumer; Janet Reno, Respondents—Appellants.
Judges: Before: FERGUSON, FISHER and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 63
Pages: 992–992

Head Matter:
Phong Thanh NGUYEN, Petitioner—Appellee, v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE; Federal Detention Center Seatac; Katrina C. Pflaumer; Janet Reno, Respondents—Appellants.
No. 01-36059.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 7, 2002.
Decided May 22, 2003.
Before: FERGUSON, FISHER and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
The Immigration and Naturalization Service appeals the district court's grant of habeas relief to Appellee Phong Thanh Nguyen.
The district court held that § 212(h) of the Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA"), as amended by § 348(a) of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 ("IIRI-RA"), violates the equal protection clause by denying consideration of discretionary relief from deportation to legal aliens convicted of "aggravated felonies," but permitting consideration of relief from deportation to illegal aliens convicted of the same offenses.
Our recent decision in Taniguchi v. Schultz, 303 F.3d 950 (9th Cir.2002) controls. We held that there is a rational basis for denying a § 212(h) waiver to aggravated felon legal aliens but not to other aliens. Id. at 957-58. The order of the district court is REVERSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.