Case Name: Barber v. Bennett
Court: New York Superior Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1852-02-20
Citations: 4 Sandf. 705
Docket Number: 
Parties: Barber v. Bennett.
Judges: 
Reporter: Reports of cases argued and determined in the Superior Court of the city of New York
Volume: 6
Pages: 705–706

Head Matter:
Barber v. Bennett.
If is no objection to a motion to strike out of a pleading irrelevant matter, that tbe moving party does not show affirmatively that be noticed bis motion within twenty days from the service of the pleading.
If the notice were not served in time, tbe adverse party desiring tbe benefit of ' that fact must show it in bis defence.
February 20, 1852.
Motion to strike out portions of the reply. The plaintiff made a preliminary objection, that it did not appear in the defendant’s affidavit that the motion was noticed within the twenty days prescribed by rule 43 of tbe supreme court. He cited tbe rule, and Bogers v. Bathbme, 6 How. Pr. Rep. 67.
B. Galbraith, for tbe defendant.
L. Gardenier, for the plaintiff.

Opinion:
Sandford, J.,