Case Name: SUNEARTH, INC., a California corporation; The Solaray Corporation, a Hawaiian corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SUN EARTH SOLAR POWER CO., LTD., FKA Ningbo Solar Electric Power Co., Ltd., a Chinese limited liability company; NBSolar USA Inc., a California corporation, Defendants-Appellees; SunEarth, Inc., a California corporation; The Solaray Corporation, a Hawaiian corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Sun Earth Solar Power Co., Ltd., FKA Ningbo Solar Electric Power Co., Ltd., a Chinese limited liability company; NBSolar USA Inc., a California corporation, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-09-14
Citations: 837 F.3d 978
Docket Number: No. 13-17622, No. 15-16096
Parties: SUNEARTH, INC., a California corporation; The Solaray Corporation, a Hawaiian corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SUN EARTH SOLAR POWER CO., LTD., FKA Ningbo Solar Electric Power Co., Ltd., a Chinese limited liability company; NBSolar USA Inc., a California corporation, Defendants-Appellees. SunEarth, Inc., a California corporation; The Solaray Corporation, a Hawaiian corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Sun Earth Solar Power Co., Ltd., FKA Ningbo Solar Electric Power Co., Ltd., a Chinese limited liability company; NBSolar USA Inc., a California corporation, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 837
Pages: 978–979

Head Matter:
SUNEARTH, INC., a California corporation; The Solaray Corporation, a Hawaiian corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SUN EARTH SOLAR POWER CO., LTD., FKA Ningbo Solar Electric Power Co., Ltd., a Chinese limited liability company; NBSolar USA Inc., a California corporation, Defendants-Appellees. SunEarth, Inc., a California corporation; The Solaray Corporation, a Hawaiian corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Sun Earth Solar Power Co., Ltd., FKA Ningbo Solar Electric Power Co., Ltd., a Chinese limited liability company; NBSolar USA Inc., a California corporation, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 13-17622, No. 15-16096
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Filed September 14, 2016

Opinion:
ORDER
THOMAS, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.