Case Name: Sammie Lamont MCCOLLOUGH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Terry O'BRIEN, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-12-19
Citations: 258 F. App'x 611
Docket Number: No. 07-7091
Parties: Sammie Lamont MCCOLLOUGH, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Terry O’BRIEN, Warden, Respondent—Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 258
Pages: 611–612

Head Matter:
Sammie Lamont MCCOLLOUGH, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Terry O’BRIEN, Warden, Respondent—Appellee.
No. 07-7091.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 13, 2007.
Decided: Dec. 19, 2007.
Sammie Lamont McCollough, Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Paul Giorno, Office of the United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Sammie Lamont McCollough, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See McCollough v. O'Brien, No. 7:06-cv-00712-jct, 2007 WL 2029308 (W.D.Va. July 10, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
The district court mistakenly referred to this action as one proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) in its final order. We conclude this was a clerical error, as the court properly referred to the action as one pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in its memorandum opinion.