Case Name: Jay Anthony SHAW, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1983-03-15
Citations: 648 S.W.2d 897
Docket Number: No. 45265
Parties: Jay Anthony SHAW, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: CRANDALL, P.J., and CRIST, J., concur.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 648
Pages: 897–897

Head Matter:
Jay Anthony SHAW, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 45265.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
March 15, 1983.
David J. Kueter, Steelville, for movant.
John Ashcroft, Atty. Gen., Kristie Green, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, William J. Hannah, Pros. Atty., St. Charles, for respondent.

Opinion:
REINHARD, Judge.
Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion without an evidentiary hearing.
On November 3, 1980, movant pleaded guilty to the offense of sale of a schedule II controlled substance, a violation of § 195.-020, RSMo. 1978. Thereafter, he was sentenced to a term of seven years with the Department of Corrections.
Movant filed a 27.26 motion alleging that he was denied adequate representation. The trial court filed findings of fact and conclusions of law, determined that movant was not entitled to an evidentiary hearing and dismissed his petition. We have carefully reviewed the record and conclude that findings of fact, conclusions of law and judgment of the trial court are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. We have determined that an opinion would have no precedential value and the court's order is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
CRANDALL, P.J., and CRIST, J., concur.