Case Name: Robert J. COLLINS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. J.L. NORWOOD, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-02-23
Citations: 221 F. App'x 607
Docket Number: No. 06-55245
Parties: Robert J. COLLINS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. J.L. NORWOOD, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 221
Pages: 607–608

Head Matter:
Robert J. COLLINS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. J.L. NORWOOD, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 06-55245.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 20, 2007.
Filed Feb. 23, 2007.
Robert J. Collins, Adelanto, CA, pro se.
Jeffrey Backhus, Esq., USLA-Offiee of the U.S. Attorney, Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.
Before: BEEZER, FERNANDEZ, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Robert J. Collins appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.
We reject Collins' contentions that the district court lacked jurisdiction to refer his ease to a magistrate judge without his consent, and that the magistrate judge lacked jurisdiction to handle that referral for the entire case. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Wang v. Masaitis, 416 F.3d 992, 999-1000 (9th Cir.2005).
The Clerk shall file Collins' Judicial Notice and Supplemental Appeal Brief, received April 4, 2006.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.