Case Name: Phillip WARNER, Appellant, v. The CITY OF MIAMI, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1986-07-01
Citations: 490 So. 2d 1045
Docket Number: No. 85-1919
Parties: Phillip WARNER, Appellant, v. The CITY OF MIAMI, Appellee.
Judges: Before BASKIN, FERGUSON and JOR-GENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 490
Pages: 1045–1045

Head Matter:
Phillip WARNER, Appellant, v. The CITY OF MIAMI, Appellee.
No. 85-1919.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 1, 1986.
Fine Jacobson Schwartz Nash Block & England and Dale A. Heckerling, Miami, Bill Ullman, for appellant.
Simon, Schindler, Hurst & Sandberg and Thomas M. Pflaum, Miami, for appellee.
Before BASKIN, FERGUSON and JOR-GENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The law of this case was established in Warner v. City of Miami, 458 So.2d 338 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). We reject the City's argument that Warner is not entitled to a rehabilitation building permit because the trial court was without jurisdiction to require that such a permit be issued and the owner did not exhaust his administrative remedies by appealing to the zoning board. We, accordingly, reverse the order under review and remand to the trial court with directions to conduct an evidentiary hearing and determine on the merits whether Warner is entitled to the building permit.
Reversed and remanded with directions.
BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ., concur.