Case Name: In re the Marriage of Dianne Marie BOHNERT, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Clarence Edward BOHNERT, Respondent-Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1988-01-12
Citations: 742 S.W.2d 629
Docket Number: No. 52615
Parties: In re the Marriage of Dianne Marie BOHNERT, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Clarence Edward BOHNERT, Respondent-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 742
Pages: 629–629

Head Matter:
In re the Marriage of Dianne Marie BOHNERT, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Clarence Edward BOHNERT, Respondent-Appellant.
No. 52615.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Jan. 12, 1988.
David B. Lacks, Kris R. Baumgartner, St. Louis, for respondent-appellant.
Herbert A. Kasten, Jr., Ste. Genevieve, for petitioner-respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Husband appeals from the portions of a dissolution decree that distributed the marital property and awarded maintenance to wife. Wife contends, with some justification, that husband's points relied on do not comply with Rule 84.04(d). Nevertheless, we have reviewed the merits of husband's contentions in light of the standards set forth in Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976), and conclude from the record that the distribution of marital property and the award of maintenance are supported by substantial evidence. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).