Case Name: In the Matter of State of New York Unified Court System, Appellant, v. Association of Surrogate's and Supreme Court Reporters Within the City of New York, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2013-03-28
Citations: 104 A.D.3d 621
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of State of New York Unified Court System, Appellant, v Association of Surrogate’s and Supreme Court Reporters Within the City of New York, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 104
Pages: 621–622

Head Matter:
In the Matter of State of New York Unified Court System, Appellant, v Association of Surrogate’s and Supreme Court Reporters Within the City of New York, Respondent.
[961 NYS2d 773]

Opinion:
Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Jaffe, J.), February 29, 2012, compelling arbitration, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the arbitration is permanently stayed.
While we find no statutory, constitutional or public policy prohibition against arbitration of this dispute as to the termination of an employee (see Matter of Incorporated Vil. of Lake Grove v Civil Serv. Empls. Assn., 118 AD2d 781 [2d Dept 1986]), a review of the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) discloses that the parties did not agree to arbitrate the dispute (see Matter of County of Chautauqua v Civil Serv. Empls. Assn., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, County of Chautauqua Unit 6300, Chautauqua County Local 807, 8 NY3d 513, 519 [2007]). Article 12.6 of the CBA provides that an employee aggrieved by a penalty or punishment may appeal from the determination by petition to the Chief Administrative Judge or by an application pursuant to CPLR article 78.
Since the issue whether respondent's claim is a contract griev anee or a non-contract grievance does not arise in this matter, article 16.8 of the CBA is not applicable. Concur — Tom, J.E, Acosta, Saxe, Freedman and Feinman, JJ.