Case Name: STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Cary ARNOLD, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-05-29
Citations: 579 So. 2d 902
Docket Number: No. 89-1549
Parties: STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Cary ARNOLD, Appellee.
Judges: DELL and POLEN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 579
Pages: 902–902

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Cary ARNOLD, Appellee.
No. 89-1549.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
May 29, 1991.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and John M. Koenig, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Cherry Grant, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
PER CURIAM.
Although we deny appellee's motion for rehearing, we substitute this opinion for the opinion issued January 31, 1990:
Upon the motion for rehearing and motion for rehearing en banc filed by appellee, this court voted to consider the issue en banc. We have now reviewed the opinion of the United States Supreme Court in California v. Hodari, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 1547, 113 L.Ed.2d 690 (1991), which we find dispositive.
Accordingly, the court voted to dis-en banc. Appellee's motion for rehearing is denied, the order of the trial court suppressing the evidence is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
DELL and POLEN, JJ., concur.
GARRETT, J., concurs specially with opinion.