Case Name: CASIMIR KUROWSKI AND LUCILLE KUROWSKI, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF BAYONNE, A CORPORATE BODY, AND MORRIS PADWE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1951-01-17
Citations: 11 N.J. Super. 433
Docket Number: 
Parties: CASIMIR KUROWSKI AND LUCILLE KUROWSKI, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF BAYONNE, A CORPORATE BODY, AND MORRIS PADWE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 11
Pages: 433–444

Head Matter:
CASIMIR KUROWSKI AND LUCILLE KUROWSKI, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF BAYONNE, A CORPORATE BODY, AND MORRIS PADWE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued January 2, 1951 —
Decided January 17, 1951.
Before Judges Freund, Proctor and Rogers.
Mr. Stephen P. Piga argued the cause for the plaintiffskppellants.
Mr. William Rubin argued the cause for the defendant-respondent Board of Adjustment of the City of Bayonne.
Mr. A. Alfred Fink, attorney for defendant-respondent Morris Padwe.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Brennan in the court below.