Case Name: Robert John MOES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Stephen DEWALT, Warden; David A. Holler, Case Manager, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-02-02
Citations: 164 F. App'x 432
Docket Number: No. 05-7429
Parties: Robert John MOES, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Stephen DEWALT, Warden; David A. Holler, Case Manager, Respondents—Appellees.
Judges: Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 164
Pages: 432–433

Head Matter:
Robert John MOES, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Stephen DEWALT, Warden; David A. Holler, Case Manager, Respondents—Appellees.
No. 05-7429.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 26, 2006.
Decided: Feb. 2, 2006.
Robert John Moes, Appellant Pro Se. James A. Frederick, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Robert John Moes, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and have found no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Moes v. DeWalt, No. CA-04-2959-8-RWT (D. Md. filed Aug. 26, 2005 & entered Aug. 30, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED