Case Name: David T. McGrath, Appellant, v. Rudolph Blumenthal and Alexander H. Rosenbaum, Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1927-05
Citations: 220 A.D. 781
Docket Number: 
Parties: David T. McGrath, Appellant, v. Rudolph Blumenthal and Alexander H. Rosenbaum, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 220
Pages: 781–781

Head Matter:
David T. McGrath, Appellant, v. Rudolph Blumenthal and Alexander H. Rosenbaum, Respondents.

Opinion:
Order vacating examination of defendant Rudolph Blumenthal before trial reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The fact, if it be a fact, that plaintiff already has knowledge of the matters sought to be elicited by the examination of said defendant is no reason for refusing the examination. (Istok v. Senderling, 118 App. Div. 162; Terry v. Ross Heater & Mfg. Co., 180 id. 714; Pierce v. Morris, 192 id. 502; Richards v. Whiting, 127 id. 208.) Kelly, P. J., Young, Kapper, Lazansky and Hagarty," JJ., concur.