Case Name: Heather L. CRUMBAKER, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. REGENCE BLUECROSS BLUESHIELD of Oregon; Computer Task Group, Incorporated, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-11-19
Citations: 22 F. App'x 809
Docket Number: No. 00-35685; D.C. No. CV-99-00478-AJB
Parties: Heather L. CRUMBAKER, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. REGENCE BLUECROSS BLUESHIELD of Oregon; Computer Task Group, Incorporated, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 22
Pages: 809–810

Head Matter:
Heather L. CRUMBAKER, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. REGENCE BLUECROSS BLUESHIELD of Oregon; Computer Task Group, Incorporated, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 00-35685.
D.C. No. CV-99-00478-AJB.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 14, 2001 .
Decided Nov. 19, 2001.
Before KOZINSKI and GOULD, Circuit Judges, and SCHWARZER, District Judge.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
The Honorable William W Schwarzer, United States Senior District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
The district court did not err in granting summary judgment for defendants on Crumbaker's claim of discrimination on the basis of disability. "[0]ne must have an actual disability" to sue under this provision of the Americans with Disabilities Act, Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471, 478, 119 S.Ct. 2139, 144 L.Ed.2d 450 (1999), and plaintiffs self-diagnosis, plaintiff lacking adequate qualifications, is insufficient to make a prima facie showing of disability. See 42 U.S.C. § 12102(2)(A) (2000).
Nor did the district court err in granting defendants summary judgment on plaintiffs claim that she suffered discrimination because defendants regarded her as disabled. See 42 U.S.C. § 12102(2)(C) (2000). Plaintiff failed to make a prima facie showing that defendants believed she had an "impairment that substantially limits one or more of [her] major life activities." 42 U.S.C. § 12102(2)(A) (2000). Defendants' knowledge of plaintiffs purported impairment was insufficient to demonstrate that they regarded her as disabled.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.