Case Name: Peter Thomann, Individually and for the Benefit of Approximately 225 Permit Men of Local Union 345 of the International Union of United Brewery, Flour, Cereal and Soft Drink Workers of America, Similarly Situated, Respondent, v. Charles Flynn, as President of Local Union 345 of the International Union of United Brewery, Flour, Cereal and Soft Drink Workers of America, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1937-03-25
Citations: 250 A.D. 785
Docket Number: 
Parties: Peter Thomann, Individually and for the Benefit of Approximately 225 Permit Men of Local Union 345 of the International Union of United Brewery, Flour, Cereal and Soft Drink Workers of America, Similarly Situated, Respondent, v. Charles Flynn, as President of Local Union 345 of the International Union of United Brewery, Flour, Cereal and Soft Drink Workers of America, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 250
Pages: 785–785

Head Matter:
Peter Thomann, Individually and for the Benefit of Approximately 225 Permit Men of Local Union 345 of the International Union of United Brewery, Flour, Cereal and Soft Drink Workers of America, Similarly Situated, Respondent, v. Charles Flynn, as President of Local Union 345 of the International Union of United Brewery, Flour, Cereal and Soft Drink Workers of America, Appellant.

Opinion:
Action for a permanent mandatory injunction and for damages. Plaintiff sues on behalf of himself and others similarly situated to be reinstated to membership in the trades union of which the defendant is president, on the ground of improper exclusion or expulsion from the rights, benefits and privileges of membership. Order framing issues of fact for trial by a jury modified by striking therefrom items, 2, 3, 4 and 5, and by inserting therein two additional items framed to cover the issues of fact arising from the denial of the allegations in paragraphs fourteenth and fifteenth of the complaint, and as thus modified affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in Meinhardt v. Flynn (ante, p. 783), decided herewith. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Close, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.