Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Derrick Lamarr DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-01-24
Citations: 120 F. App'x 196
Docket Number: No. 04-10392; D.C. No. CR-04-00051-RLH
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Derrick Lamarr DAVIS, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before BEEZER, HALL, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 120
Pages: 196–197

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Derrick Lamarr DAVIS, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 04-10392.
D.C. No. CR-04-00051-RLH.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 10, 2005.
Decided Jan. 24, 2005.
Timothy S. Vasquez, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Las Vegas, NV, for PlaintiffAppellee.
Arthur L. Allen, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before BEEZER, HALL, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Derrick Lamarr Davis appeals his 6-month sentence imposed after the revocation of his term of supervised release. Davis was convicted of conspiracy to distribute cocaine. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Davis has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Davis has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. We therefore GRANT counsel's motion to withdraw and AFFIRM the district court's judgment.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 .