Case Name: Javier ODIO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1997-04-30
Citations: 692 So. 2d 293
Docket Number: No. 96-3002
Parties: Javier ODIO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before LEVY, GREEN and SHEVIN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 692
Pages: 293–294

Head Matter:
Javier ODIO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 96-3002.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 30, 1997.
Sharpstein & Sharpstein and Ada Manzano Avallone, Miami, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Lara J. Edelstein, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before LEVY, GREEN and SHEVIN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Whren v. United States, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 1769, 135 L.Ed.2d 89 (1996); State v. Holland, 680 So.2d 1041 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996), review granted, 689 So.2d 1069 (Fla. 1997); State v. Corvin, 677 So.2d 947 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Petrel v. State, 675 So.2d 1049 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). See generally Saturnino-Boudet v. State, 682 So.2d 188, 191 n. 5 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)(noting District Courts of Appeal's observation that Whren has substantially altered search and seizure jurisprudence as it pertains to traffic stops), review dismissed, 689 So.2d 1071 (Fla.1997).