Case Name: Theon FORD, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2010-12-21
Citations: 327 S.W.3d 628
Docket Number: No. ED 94071
Parties: Theon FORD, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 327
Pages: 628–629

Head Matter:
Theon FORD, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 94071.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Dec. 21, 2010.
Jo Ann Rotermund, St. Louis, MO, for Movant/Appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jamie P. Rasmussen, Jefferson City, MO, for Respon--dent/Respondent.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Theon Ford appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief from the judgment convicting him of two counts of first-degree assault and two counts of armed criminal action, for which he was sentenced to a total of twenty years' imprisonment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k); O'Neal v. State, 236 S.W.3d 91, 95 (Mo.App. E.D.2007). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2008, unless otherwise indicated.