Case Name: Marjorie L. SUTTON, Defendant/Appellant, v. James E. YARBROUGH, and Mary L. Yarbrough, Plaintiffs/Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-01-31
Citations: 894 S.W.2d 179
Docket Number: No. 65177
Parties: Marjorie L. SUTTON, Defendant/Appellant, v. James E. YARBROUGH, and Mary L. Yarbrough, Plaintiffs/Respondents.
Judges: Before CRANDALL, P.J., and WHITE and CRAHAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 894
Pages: 179–180

Head Matter:
Marjorie L. SUTTON, Defendant/Appellant, v. James E. YARBROUGH, and Mary L. Yarbrough, Plaintiffs/Respondents.
No. 65177.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Northern Division.
Jan. 31, 1995.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 7, 1995.
Branson L. Wood, II, Hannibal, for appellant.
Robert M. Clayton, II, Hannibal, for respondents.
Before CRANDALL, P.J., and WHITE and CRAHAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant Marjorie Sutton, Personal Representative of the Estate of Anna Schmedt ("Decedent"), appeals from the trial court's judgment in favor of Respondents James and Mary Yarbrough on their petition for specific performance of a debt adjustment agreement. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment is supported by substantial and competent evidence on the whole record. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).