Case Name: Rosario Penachio, Respondent, v. The Saati Society, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1900-11
Citations: 33 Misc. 751
Docket Number: 
Parties: Rosario Penachio, Respondent, v. The Saati Society, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 33
Pages: 751–752

Head Matter:
Rosario Penachio, Respondent, v. The Saati Society, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of Eew York, second district, borough of Manhattan.
Andrea Palmeri, for appellant.
John Palmieri, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The by-laws of the defendant were modified four years before the plaintiff's illness, by providing the said benefits were confined to members residing within Eew York, Brooklyn or Astoria. Subsequent to this amendment, the plaintiff signed the new by-laws and expressly declared his submission to the same. It being conceded that the plaintiff was a resident of Jersey City at the time of the illness in question, he was not entitled to sick benefits. The judgment awarding them is absolutely without proof to sustain it and must be reversed.
Present: Beekman, P. J., Giegerioh and O'Gorman, JJ.
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.