Case Name: M.O, Petitioner/Appellant, v. J.T.C, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2014-08-05
Citations: 437 S.W.3d 829
Docket Number: No. ED 100368
Parties: M.O, Petitioner/Appellant, v. J.T.C, Respondent.
Judges: Before LISA S. VAN AMBURG, P.J., PATRICIA L. COHEN., J., and PHILIP M. HESS, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 437
Pages: 829–830

Head Matter:
M.O, Petitioner/Appellant, v. J.T.C, Respondent.
No. ED 100368.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Aug. 5, 2014.
Meghan Largent, Clayton, MO, for appellant.
Armeta Cotten, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before LISA S. VAN AMBURG, P.J., PATRICIA L. COHEN., J., and PHILIP M. HESS, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
M.O. ("Mother") appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying her petition for a full order of protection against J.T.C. ("Father") under Missouri's Adult Abuse Act. Mother contends the trial court erred in denying her petition because there was "substantial evidence to support a finding of abuse."
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).