Case Name: Roger L. CLARK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2013-06-18
Citations: 400 S.W.3d 910
Docket Number: No. WD 75268
Parties: Roger L. CLARK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Division Three: JOSEPH M. ELLIS, LISA WHITE HARDWICK and CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 400
Pages: 910–910

Head Matter:
Roger L. CLARK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 75268.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
June 18, 2013.
Evan J. Buchheiim, Jefferson City, MO, for appellant.
Daniem S. De Loyola, Kansas City, MO, for respondent.
Before Division Three: JOSEPH M. ELLIS, LISA WHITE HARDWICK and CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, JJ.

Opinion:
Order
PER CURIAM.
Roger Clark appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after he was convicted of first-degree statutory sodomy. Clark contends the motion court erred in denying post-conviction relief because his defense counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate and present mitigation evidence at his sentencing hearing. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment.
AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b)