Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Appellant, v. Sabr SALIK, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2007-01-16
Citations: 211 S.W.3d 625
Docket Number: No. ED 87399
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Appellant, v. Sabr SALIK, Respondent.
Judges: Before GEORGE W. DRAPER III, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., J., and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 211
Pages: 625–626

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Appellant, v. Sabr SALIK, Respondent.
No. ED 87399.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Jan. 16, 2007.
Edward S. Thompson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, Stephanie Mor-rell, Stephanie L. Wan, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before GEORGE W. DRAPER III, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., J., and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Sabr Salik (hereinafter, "Defendant") appeals from the judgment entered after a jury verdict finding him guilty of one count of statutory sodomy in the first degree, Section 566.062 RSMo (2000), and one count of attempted statutory sodomy in the first degree, Section 575.270 RSMo (2000). The trial court sentenced Defendant to twenty-five years' imprisonment on each count, to be served concurrently. Defendant raises two points on appeal, claiming there was insufficient evidence to prove attempted statutory sodomy and there was plain error in failing to instruct the jury it had to find Defendant intended to insert a crayon into his stepdaughter's genitalia.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find Defendant's allegation of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).