Case Name: Edward JEFFERSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2015-06-23
Citations: 464 S.W.3d 559
Docket Number: No. ED 101850
Parties: Edward JEFFERSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Lawrence E. Mooney, P.J., Clifford H. Ahrens, J. and Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 464
Pages: 559–559

Head Matter:
Edward JEFFERSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 101850
Missouri. Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Filed: June 23, 2015
Matthew W. Huckeby, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 68101, for Appellant.
Mary H. Moore, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for Respondent.
Before Lawrence E. Mooney, P.J., Clifford H. Ahrens, J. and Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Edward Jefferson appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing. Jefferson argues the motion court erred in overruling his motion because his appellate counsel was ineffective by failing to raise a relevant claim on appeal.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. We find the judgment of the motion court was based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the: facts in detail and restating principles of law would' have' nd prece-dential value. The partiés have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 84.16(b).