Case Name: MISSOURI HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, Respondent, v. Alan WALLACH et al., Appellants
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-02-07
Citations: 892 S.W.2d 806
Docket Number: No. 65314
Parties: MISSOURI HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, Respondent, v. Alan WALLACH et al., Appellants.
Judges: Before SMITH, P.J., and KAROHL and WHITE, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 892
Pages: 806–807

Head Matter:
MISSOURI HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, Respondent, v. Alan WALLACH et al., Appellants.
No. 65314.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Feb. 7, 1995.
Joe Bill Carter, Kirkwood, for appellants.
Paul R. Sterrett, Chesterfield, for respondent.
Before SMITH, P.J., and KAROHL and WHITE, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
ORDER
Appellants, owners of property appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict which awarded them $35,000 damages for land taken by the Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission. We affirm.
In their sole point on appeal, property owners contend the trial court erroneously sustained the Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission's objection during closing argument. We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and find the claim of error is without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).