Case Name: Slattery v. Sterling Hotel Company, Appellant
Court: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1944-09-29
Citations: 156 Pa. Super. 82
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 19
Parties: Slattery v. Sterling Hotel Company, Appellant.
Judges: Before Keller, P. J., Baldrige, Rhodes, Hirt, Reno and James, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania Superior Court Reports
Volume: 156
Pages: 82–84

Head Matter:
Slattery v. Sterling Hotel Company, Appellant.
Argued September 27, 1944.
Before Keller, P. J., Baldrige, Rhodes, Hirt, Reno and James, JJ.
Robert J. Doran, with him Reynolds & Reynolds, for appellant.
Frank P. Slattery, for appellees.
September 29, 1944:

Opinion:
'Peb Curiam,
There is no substantial difference between the clause in the mortgage given by the defendant corporation, and relied on by it in this appeal, and the corresponding clause in the mortgage passed upon by the Supreme Court in Putnam v. Pittsburgh Railways Co., 330 Pa. 210, 199 A. 211. That decision justifies the action of the court below.
The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Aponick,