Case Name: DIETRICH v. UNITED STATES SHIPPING BOARD MERCHANT FLEET CORPORATION
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1932-06-06
Citations: 59 F.2d 202
Docket Number: No. 436
Parties: DIETRICH v. UNITED STATES SHIPPING BOARD MERCHANT FLEET CORPORATION.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 59
Pages: 202–203

Head Matter:
DIETRICH v. UNITED STATES SHIPPING BOARD MERCHANT FLEET CORPORATION.
No. 436.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
June 6, 1932.
Neil P. Cullom, of New York City (James E. Freehill, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
George Z. Medalie, U. S. Atty., of New York City (Frederick H. Cunningham, of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.
Before MANTON, SWAN, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Upon tile theory that the Susquehanna Steamship Company was ojierating the ship Panola as agent for the appellee, the appellant seeks to recover on a judgment obtained in the state Supreme Court. The recovery is for a breach of a contract of carriage. The ship Panola was a merchant vessel owned by the United States. Under the authority of United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp. v. Lustgarten, 280 U. S. 320, 50 S. Ct. 118, 74 L. Ed. 451, and Weinstein v. Black Diamond S. S. Corp., 40 F.(2d) 590 (C. C. A. 2), the exclusive remedy as against the United States is under the Suits in Admiralty Act (46 USCA § 741-752). The rule announced in these cases is applicable to the instant suit, and upon such authority the bill was properly dismissed.
Decree affirmed.