Case Name: SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Seymour VIGMAN, et al., Defendants, and Robert G. Holmes, Jr., Defendant-Appellee; Eugene W. BELL, Trustee for the liquidation of Joseph Sebag Incorporated ("Bell"); Laurence A. Schroeder, Successor Trustee for the Liquidation of First State Securities Corporation ("Schroeder"), Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Seymour VIGMAN, et al., Defendants, and Robert G. Holmes, Jr., DefendantAppellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1992-05-19
Citations: 964 F.2d 924
Docket Number: Nos. 89-55094, 89-55128
Parties: SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Seymour VIGMAN, et al., Defendants, and Robert G. Holmes, Jr., Defendant-Appellee. Eugene W. BELL, Trustee for the liquidation of Joseph Sebag Incorporated (“Bell”); Laurence A. Schroeder, Successor Trustee for the Liquidation of First State Securities Corporation (“Schroeder”), Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Seymour VIGMAN, et al., Defendants, and Robert G. Holmes, Jr., DefendantAppellee.
Judges: Before: SCHROEDER, THOMPSON and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 964
Pages: 924–924

Head Matter:
SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Seymour VIGMAN, et al., Defendants, and Robert G. Holmes, Jr., Defendant-Appellee. Eugene W. BELL, Trustee for the liquidation of Joseph Sebag Incorporated (“Bell”); Laurence A. Schroeder, Successor Trustee for the Liquidation of First State Securities Corporation (“Schroeder”), Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Seymour VIGMAN, et al., Defendants, and Robert G. Holmes, Jr., DefendantAppellee.
Nos. 89-55094, 89-55128.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 19, 1992.
Before: SCHROEDER, THOMPSON and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
The mandate of the United States Supreme Court, certified on April 27, 1992, reversed the judgment of this court published at 908 F.2d 1461 (9th Cir.1990). Accordingly, we remand this ease to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court in Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection Corporation, et al., — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 1311, 117 L.Ed.2d 532 (1992).