Case Name: HELEN HYJACK, INDIVIDUALLY, AND ON BEHALF OF OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. JOSEPH M. NOLAN, ETC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1977-12-01
Citations: 154 N.J. Super. 173
Docket Number: 
Parties: HELEN HYJACK, INDIVIDUALLY, AND ON BEHALF OF OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. JOSEPH M. NOLAN, ETC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 154
Pages: 173–174

Head Matter:
HELEN HYJACK, INDIVIDUALLY, AND ON BEHALF OF OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. JOSEPH M. NOLAN, ETC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued November 9, 1977
Decided December 1, 1977.
Before Judges Lynch, Bischoff and Kole.
Mr. Jay Scott MacNeill argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Nolan, Dynes, Bell & Moore, attorneys; Messrs. Mac-Neill and William F. McEnroe on the brief).
Mr. James E. Flynn argued the cause for respondents.

Opinion:
Pee Curiam.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated by Judge Kentz in his opinion reported at 144 N. J. Super. 545 (Law Div. 1976).