Case Name: Daniel ROSE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M. Colston JONES, Lawyer, Public Defender; Kathleen A. Ortiz, Lawyer, Public Defender, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-09-28
Citations: 697 F. App'x 783
Docket Number: No. 17-6675
Parties: Daniel ROSE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M. Colston JONES, Lawyer, Public Defender; Kathleen A. Ortiz, Lawyer, Public Defender, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior ■ Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 697
Pages: 783–783

Head Matter:
Daniel ROSE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M. Colston JONES, Lawyer, Public Defender; Kathleen A. Ortiz, Lawyer, Public Defender, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 17-6675
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: September 26, 2017
Decided: September 28, 2017
Daniel Rose, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior ■ Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Daniel Rose appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rose v. Jones, No. 2:17-cv-00226-AWA-RJK (E.D. Va. filed May 15, 2017, entered May 16, 2017), We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED