Case Name: BOYKIN v. CAPEHART ET AL.
Court: Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jurisdiction: South Carolina
Decision Date: 1944-10-03
Citations: 205 S.C. 276
Docket Number: 15681
Parties: BOYKIN v. CAPEHART ET AL.
Judges: Mr. Chiee Justice Baker and Messrs. Associate Justices Fishburne,-StukEs^ Tayeor, and Oxner concur.
Reporter: South Carolina Reports
Volume: 205
Pages: 276–296

Head Matter:
15681
BOYKIN v. CAPEHART ET AL.
(31 S. E. (2d), 506)
Mr. Henry Savage, Jrof Camden, S. C., and Mr. C. T. Graydon, of Columbia, S. C., Counsel for Appellant,
Messrs. Robinson & Robinson, and Messrs. Thomas> Cain & Black, all of Columbia, S. C., Counsel for Respondents
October 3, 1944.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The Court is satisfied, from a careful study of the questions presented by this appeal, that Judge Bellinger correctly disposed of all issues involved in the case. The decree of the Circuit Court, the order refusing a new trial, and the order confirming the survey and plat of the boundary line, set forth fully the history of the litigation. We are in accord with the reasoning and conclusions of Judge Bellinger in his decree and orders, and affirm the judgment of the lower Court.
Judgment affirmed.
Mr. Chiee Justice Baker and Messrs. Associate Justices Fishburne,-StukEs^ Tayeor, and Oxner concur.