Case Name: Hubert WRIGHT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dr. George J. BETO, Director, Texas Dept. of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1971-08-16
Citations: 446 F.2d 889
Docket Number: No. 71-1496
Parties: Hubert WRIGHT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dr. George J. BETO, Director, Texas Dept. of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 446
Pages: 889–890

Head Matter:
Hubert WRIGHT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dr. George J. BETO, Director, Texas Dept. of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 71-1496
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 16, 1971.
Hubert Wright, pro se.
Crawford C. Martin, Atty. Gen., State of Tex., Larry J. Craddock, Asst. Atty. Gen., Nola White, First Asst. Atty. Gen., Alfred Walker, Executive Asst. Atty. Gen., Robert C. Flowers, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., for respondent-ap-pellee.
Before BELL, AINSWORTH, and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges.
Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co., of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
This appeal is without redeeming merit. It would have been appropriate for the district court to have denied the certificate of probable cause, thus terminating the processing of an insubstantial claim.
Affirmed.