Case Name: Roy Yost et al., Respondents, v. Stanley Blumenfeld et al., Doing Business as Munro Machinery Co., Appellants, et al., Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1978-03-06
Citations: 61 A.D.2d 981
Docket Number: 
Parties: Roy Yost et al., Respondents, v Stanley Blumenfeld et al., Doing Business as Munro Machinery Co., Appellants, et al., Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 61
Pages: 981–981

Head Matter:
Roy Yost et al., Respondents, v Stanley Blumenfeld et al., Doing Business as Munro Machinery Co., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Opinion:
In an action to recover damages for fraudulent inducement to enter into a contract, the appeal is from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated February 8, 1977, as denied the branch of appellants' motion which sought dismissal of the first cause of action of the complaint. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. An issue of fact exists as to the first cause of action which can only be resolved at a trial. Damiani, J. P., Titone, Suozzi and O'Connor, JJ., concur.