Case Name: MARCUS LAVON JACKSON, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2008-11-26
Citations: 224 Or. App. 171
Docket Number: A124608
Parties: MARCUS LAVON JACKSON, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent.
Judges: v „ ,, Belore Rosenbium, Presiding Judge, and Brewer, Chief Judge, and Riggs, Senior Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 224
Pages: 171–172

Head Matter:
Submitted October 30,
petition for judicial review dismissed November 26, 2008,
petition for review denied February 11, 2009 (346 Or 10)
MARCUS LAVON JACKSON, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent.
Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision
A124608
197 P3d 59
Peter Ozanne, Executive Director, Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, and Kristin Carveth, Deputy Public Defender, Legal Services Division, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for petitioner.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Erin C. Lagesen, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.!-, v „ ,, r
v „ ,, Belore Rosenbium, Presiding Judge, and Brewer, Chief Judge, and Riggs, Senior Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Petitioner seeks judicial review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision denying his request to reopen his case and to reconsider an order revoking his parole. We lack jurisdiction to review the order denying petitioner's request. ORS 144.335(1) limits judicial review to final orders of the board. As the Supreme Court explained in Mastriano v. Board of Parole, 342 Or 684, 686, 159 P3d 1151 (2007), "a board order denying reopening and reconsideration of an earlier final order is not itself a final order for purposes of judicial review pursuant to ORS 144.335(1)." It follows that we lack jurisdiction to review the order before us.
Petition for judicial review dismissed.