Case Name: DANIEL T. PALMER, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION et al, Respondents
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1979-07-16
Citations: 41 Or. App. 113
Docket Number: No. 79-AB-139, CA 13476
Parties: DANIEL T. PALMER, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION et al, Respondents.
Judges: PER CURIAM
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 41
Pages: 113–115

Head Matter:
Argued June 25;
resubmitted in banc without oral argument July 10,
reversed and remanded July 16, 1979
DANIEL T. PALMER, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION et al, Respondents.
(No. 79-AB-139, CA 13476)
596 P2d 1330
Larry T. Coady, Albany, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Coady & Moore, Albany.
James C. Rhodes, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent Employment Division. With him on the brief were James A. Redden, Attorney General, and Walter L. Barrie, Solicitor General, Salem.
Merle A. Long, City Attorney, Albany, waived appearance for respondent City of Albany.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
The issue here is whether petitioner was " discharged for misconduct connected with his work V' ORS 657.176(2)(a).
Reversed and remanded for reconsideration in light of Oliver v. Employment Division, 40 Or App 487, 595 P2d 1252 (1979).
See Giese v. Employment Div., 27 Or App 929, 557 P2d 1354 (1976), rev den (1977).