Case Name: FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GOLDEN EAGLE INSURANCE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant; Federal Insurance Company, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Golden Eagle Insurance Corporation, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-07-08
Citations: 386 F. App'x 678
Docket Number: Nos. 09-55906, 09-55925
Parties: FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GOLDEN EAGLE INSURANCE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant. Federal Insurance Company, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Golden Eagle Insurance Corporation, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before: TROTT and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and BREYER, District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 386
Pages: 678–678

Head Matter:
FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GOLDEN EAGLE INSURANCE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant. Federal Insurance Company, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Golden Eagle Insurance Corporation, Defendant-Appellee.
Nos. 09-55906, 09-55925.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted June 8, 2010.
Filed July 8, 2010.
Gerald L. McMahon, Esquire, Michael G. Nardi, Esquire, Seltzer Caplan McMahon Vitek, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Richard P. Edwards, Edwards & Hunter, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: TROTT and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and BREYER, District Judge.
The Honorable Charles R. Breyer, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in the three orders relevant to this case. Those orders are (1) Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiffs and Defendant's Motions for Summary Judgment, dated May 14, 2009; (2) Order Granting Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Denying Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, dated June 26, 2007; and (3) Order Denying Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, dated May 12, 2006.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.