Case Name: Hughes v. Ainslee
Court: Supreme Court of Indiana
Jurisdiction: Indiana
Decision Date: 1867-11
Citations: 28 Ind. 346
Docket Number: 
Parties: Hughes v. Ainslee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Indiana Reports
Volume: 28
Pages: 346–347

Head Matter:
Hughes v. Ainslee.
APPEAL from the Washington Common Pleas.

Opinion:
Ray, J.
— The appellant informs us that, "waiving all other objections to the ruling of the court below, he relies upon the error of the court in overruling the affidavit for a continuance, to reverse this case."
There are at least three somewhat serious objections to a reversal upon that ground. The affidavit is not made part of the record by bill of exceptions. The ruling of the court upon the motion for a continuance was not assigned as a cause for a new trial in the court below. Grey v. Stiver et al., 24 Ind. 174; Kent v. Lawson, 12 Ind. 675. There was no motion for a new trial.
H. Heffren, for appellant.
J. A. Ghormley and M. C. Kerr, for appellee.
The judgment is affirmed, with five per cent, damages, and costs.