Case Name: Harold HERRSCHAFT, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellee
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2007-11-21
Citations: 594 Pa. 30
Docket Number: Appeal No. 59 MAP 2007
Parties: Harold HERRSCHAFT, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 594
Pages: 30–30

Head Matter:
934 A.2d 702
Harold HERRSCHAFT, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellee.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Nov. 21, 2007.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 21st day of November, 2007, the order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED, and the matter is remanded for further proceedings. The order under review initially observes that the Department may rely on a court order reflecting lines, costs, and restitution in implementing 42 Pa.C.S. § 9728, but then merely recites that the Department relied on a "communication" from the trial court (or more properly, the clerk of courts) indicating outstanding obligations. Such commentary was insufficient to support the award of summary relief.
We offer no opinion concerning the disposition of the petition for review on any other or related ground.
Jurisdiction is relinquished.