Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Cirilo MANCILLA-LOPEZ, also known as Valentine Baltazar-Flores, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-08-18
Citations: 333 F. App'x 864
Docket Number: No. 08-11092
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Cirilo MANCILLA-LOPEZ, also known as Valentine Baltazar-Flores, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 333
Pages: 864–864

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Cirilo MANCILLA-LOPEZ, also known as Valentine Baltazar-Flores, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-11092
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 18, 2009.
Susan B. Cowger, Camille Elizabeth Sparks, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Kevin Joel Page, Laura S. Harper, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Cirilo Mancilla-Lopez presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Brown, 920 F.2d 1212, 1216-17 (5th Cir.1991), abrogated on other grounds by United States v. Candia, 454 F.3d 468, 472-73 (5th Cir.2006), which held that a district court may order a term of imprisonment to run consecutively with an unimposed state sentence. The Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.