Case Name: Workman v. Franklin Cty.
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2002-03-12
Citations: 94 Ohio St. 3d 1498
Docket Number: 01-1813
Parties: Workman v. Franklin Cty.
Judges: 
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 94
Pages: 1498–1498

Head Matter:
01-1813.
Workman v. Franklin Cty.

Opinion:
Franklin App. No. OOAP-1449. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. On October 12, 2001, appellants filed a notice that a motion to certify a conflict was pending in the court of appeals and, pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(A), this court stayed consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in this appeal. Whereas appellants have neither notified this court that the court of appeals determined that a conflict does not exist as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(B), nor filed a copy of the court of appeals' order certifying the existence of a conflict as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(C),
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellants show cause, within ten days of the date of this entry, why this court should not proceed to consider the jurisdictional memoranda in this appeal pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 111(6).