Case Name: Jeremy BOBBETT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-10-09
Citations: 61 S.W.3d 286
Docket Number: No. ED 79083
Parties: Jeremy BOBBETT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., J. and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 61
Pages: 286–287

Head Matter:
Jeremy BOBBETT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 79083.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Oct. 9, 2001.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Dec. 6, 2001.
Ellen H. Flottman, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Andrea Mazza Follett, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., J. and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Jeremy Bobbett (Appellant) appeals from the denial of his Rule 24 .035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing. Appellant raises the following two points on appeal: (1) counsel was ineffective by misadvising him as to the effect of his guilty plea and the likely sentence; and, (2) counsel was ineffective in failing to call Appellant's mother and grandmother to testify on his behalf at the sentencing hearing. We have reviewed the parties' briefs and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. A written opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).