Case Name: Frank M. Petrella, Appellant, v. Robert J. O'Connor et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1985-07-05
Citations: 65 N.Y. 849
Docket Number: 
Parties: Frank M. Petrella, Appellant, v Robert J. O’Connor et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 65
Pages: 849–850

Head Matter:
Frank M. Petrella, Appellant, v Robert J. O’Connor et al., Respondents.
Decided July 5, 1985
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Peter M. Kooshoian for appellant.
Anthony M. Nosek for respondents.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs. Inasmuch as plaintiff failed to allege a propensity of the cat from which injury naturally flowed or such an unreasonable risk of danger that a duty to warn was owed, no triable issue was raised.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander and Titone.