Case Name: CITY OF TULSA v. LYNCH et al.
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1943-05-18
Citations: 193 Okla. 505
Docket Number: No. 30950
Parties: CITY OF TULSA v. LYNCH et al.
Judges: CORN, C. J., GIBSON, V. C. J., and OSBORN, BAYLESS, WELCH, HURST, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. RILEY, J., dissents.
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 193
Pages: 505–505

Head Matter:
CITY OF TULSA v. LYNCH et al.
No. 30950.
May 18, 1943.
Rehearing Denied Sept. 28, 1943.
Application for Leave to File Second Petition for Rehearing Denied Feb. 8, 1944.
145 P. 2d 202.
E. M. Gallaher, L. A. Justus, Philip J. Kramer, and C. Lawrence Elder, all of Tulsa, for plaintiff in error.
Eldon J. Dick and Lou Etta Bellamy, both of Tulsa, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
DAVISON, J.
This case is in all essential respects identical with cause No. 30727, City of Tulsa v. Emmett Johnson et al., 193 Okla. 501, 145 P. 2d 198, this day decided. The disposition of the cause in the trial court corresponds to the disposition made by the trial court in cause No. 30727, supra, except that the money judgment was for a different amount. The issues presented to this court are the sa'me except that no cross-petition has been filed by the defendant in error, a distinction which is immaterial.
Our decision in cause No. 30727, supra, determines the issues in this appeal, and the opinion and syllabus in that case is adopted as the opinion and syllabus in this case.
This cause is therefore reversed, with directions to enter judgment in favor of the defendant city.
CORN, C. J., GIBSON, V. C. J., and OSBORN, BAYLESS, WELCH, HURST, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. RILEY, J., dissents.