Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Murphy HUGHES, Appellant; Murphy HUGHES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1994-04-12
Citations: 873 S.W.2d 671
Docket Number: No. 62259
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Murphy HUGHES, Appellant. Murphy HUGHES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, C.J., and PUDLOWSKI and SIMON, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 873
Pages: 671–671

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Murphy HUGHES, Appellant. Murphy HUGHES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 62259.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
April 12, 1994.
Cynthia R. Carle, Hillsboro, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Michael J. Spillane, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, C.J., and PUDLOWSKI and SIMON, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Murphy Hughes, appeals from a jury trial conviction for attempted first degree burglary, RSMo § 564.011 (1986), entered in the Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis for which appellant was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to seven years' imprisonment. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the findings and conclusions of the circuit court are not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the circuit court's order pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b). A memorandum solely for the use the parties here involved has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.