Case Name: Olando Ravi BHARAT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patrick CONROY; Attorney General for the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-10-25
Citations: 48 F. App'x 908
Docket Number: No. 02-6845
Parties: Olando Ravi BHARAT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patrick CONROY; Attorney General for the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 48
Pages: 908–909

Head Matter:
Olando Ravi BHARAT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patrick CONROY; Attorney General for the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 02-6845.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 9, 2002.
Decided Oct. 25, 2002.
Larry Allen Nathans, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Ann Norman Bosse, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before WILLIAM D. WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Olando Ravi Bharat seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude on the reasoning of the district court that Bharat has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Bharat v. Conroy, No. CA-02-142-S (D.Md. May 1, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal con tentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.