Case Name: Martin Rodriguez SANCHEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1978-11-17
Citations: 584 F.2d 109
Docket Number: No. 78-2604
Parties: Martin Rodriguez SANCHEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 584
Pages: 109–110

Head Matter:
Martin Rodriguez SANCHEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 78-2604
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Nov. 17, 1978.
Martin Rodriguez Sanchez, pro se.
Jamie C. Boyd, U. S. Atty., Le Roy Morgan Jahn, W. Ray Jahn, Asst. U. S. Attys., San Antonio, Tex., for respondent-appellee.
Before THORNBERRY, GODBOLD and RUBIN, Circuit Judges.
Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir.,1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
This is an appeal from denial of relief under § 2255. The appellant testified under oath that there was no plea bargain. Without supporting evidence of any kind he now asserts there was. This is not sufficient. Matthews v. U. S., 533 F.2d 900 (CA5, 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1121, 97 S.Ct. 1156, 51 L.Ed.2d 571; Dugan v. U. S., 521 F.2d 231 (CA5, 1975).
The court was not required to enter findings that defendant would not benefit from the YCA. Brown v. U. S., 551 F.2d 619 (CA5, 1977); Mitchell v. U. S., 547 F.2d 875 (CA5,1977); U. S. v. Gamboa-Cano, 510 F.2d 598 (CA5, 1975). We cannot say that in imposing sentence the judge abused his discretion or considered improper factors. After this court's decision in U. S. v. Cavazos, 530 F.2d 4 (CA5, 1976), concerning appellant's codefendant, the district court on remand re-sentenced Cavazos to the same sentence previously given him, which is the same sentence given to appellant. This court affirmed Cavazos's re-sentence. U. S. v. Cavazos, No. 76-2777, 12/23/76 (unpublished opinion).