Case Name: Andres GONZALEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Edward J. CADEN, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-12-14
Citations: 357 F. App'x 900
Docket Number: No. 07-55507
Parties: Andres GONZALEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Edward J. CADEN, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 357
Pages: 900–901

Head Matter:
Andres GONZALEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Edward J. CADEN, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 07-55507.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 17, 2009.
Filed Dec. 14, 2009.
Andres Gonzalez, Tehachapi, CA, pro se.
Stephanie A. Miyoshi, Esq., AGCA-Of-fiee of the California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondent-Appel-lee.
Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
California state prisoner Andres Gonzalez appeals from the district court's judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we vacate and remand.
Gonzalez contends that his defense counsel was ineffective by failing to present the testimony of Dagoberto Cardona. We vacate the district court's denial of the habe-as petition and remand to the district court to hold an evidentiary hearing and rule on the merits of Gonzalez's ineffective assistance of counsel claim. See Scott v. Schri- ro, 567 F.3d 573, 584 (9th Cir.2009) (per curiam) (remanding to district court to conduct an evidentiary hearing); see also Houston v. Schomig, 533 F.3d 1076, 1083 n. 4 (9th Cir.2008) (remanding sua sponte).
VACATED; REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
. We note that defense counsel's performance was far from stellar. See, e.g., In re Vargas, 83 Cal.App.4th 1125, 100 Cal.Rptr.2d 265 (Ct. App.2000) (enumerating defense counsel's performance in past cases).