Case Name: TRUCK INSURANCE EXCHANGE, Appellant, v. E.H. MARTIN, INC., individually and d/b/a E & M Constructions Co.; Ernest Martin, individually and d/b/a Ernest Martin Co. and Terry J. Lawley, Appellees
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1993-09-29
Citations: 865 S.W.2d 213
Docket Number: No. 10-93-163-CV
Parties: TRUCK INSURANCE EXCHANGE, Appellant, v. E.H. MARTIN, INC., individually and d/b/a E & M Constructions Co.; Ernest Martin, individually and d/b/a Ernest Martin Co. and Terry J. Lawley, Appellees.
Judges: Before THOMAS, C.J., and CUMMINGS and VANCE, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 865
Pages: 213–214

Head Matter:
TRUCK INSURANCE EXCHANGE, Appellant, v. E.H. MARTIN, INC., individually and d/b/a E & M Constructions Co.; Ernest Martin, individually and d/b/a Ernest Martin Co. and Terry J. Lawley, Appellees.
No. 10-93-163-CV.
Court of Appeals of Texas, Waco.
Sept. 29, 1993.
Julia Pendery, Cowles & Thompson, P.C., Dallas, for appellant.
Michael Falick, Kirkendall & Collins, Houston, for appellees.
Before THOMAS, C.J., and CUMMINGS and VANCE, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
On July 20, 1993, the court signed a judgment in favor of the Martins and Lawley. In the absence of a motion for new trial or motion to modify, correct, or reform the judgment, an appeal bond was due on August 19. See Tex.R.App.P. 41; TexR.Civ.P. 329b(g). Truck Insurance Exchange learned of the signing of the judgment on August 4, fifteen days later. See TexR.App.P. 5(b)(4); Tex.R.Civ.P. 306a(4). On the same day, it forwarded a motion to modify, correct, or reform the judgment by letter addressed to "Mrs. Irene Garrett, Court Administrator, 82nd District Court, Post Office Box 75, Marlin, Texas 76661." The motion was received by the court administrator on August 5, but was not file-stamped by the clerk until September 1. Truck Insurance Exchange's appeal bond was filed with the District Clerk on September 3, at which time it also filed with the clerk of this court a motion to extend the time to file the bond.
If the motion to modify, correct, or reform the judgment was timely filed, then the appeal bond has been timely filed. See TexR.Civ.P. 329b(g). On the other hand, if the motion to modify, correct, or reform the judgment was not timely filed, the appeal bond was not timely filed, but the motion to extend the time to file the appeal bond was. See Tex.R.App.P. 41.
Rule 21 of the Rules of Civil Procedure provides that pleadings, pleas, motions and applications to the court for an order, whether in the form of a motion, plea or other form of request, unless presented during a hearing or trial, shall be filed with the clerk of the court in writing. Tex.R.Civ.P. 21. The record before us reflects that Larry R. Hoelscher is the Clerk of the District Court of Falls County but does not reflect that Irene Garrett is a deputy clerk. See Tex.Gov't.Code Ann. § 51.309 (Vernon 1988). Thus, it appears from the record that the judgment became final on August 19 because no motion for new trial or motion to modify, correct, or reform the judgment had been filed with the clerk by that date. See Tex.R.Civ.P. 329b. However, because a motion to extend the time to file the appeal bond was filed with the clerk of this court and the appeal bond was filed with the District Clerk within fifteen days after the due date, we may extend the time. See Tex.R.App.P. 41(a)(2).
The motion is granted. The time to file the appeal bond is extended to and including September 3, the date on which Truck Insurance Exchange filed its appeal bond with the District Clerk.