Case Name: Marian A. Courier, Appellant-Respondent, v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A., Respondent-Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1991-11-15
Citations: 177 A.D.2d 1020
Docket Number: 
Parties: Marian A. Courier, Appellant-Respondent, v Marine Midland Bank, N. A., Respondent-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 177
Pages: 1020–1020

Head Matter:
Marian A. Courier, Appellant-Respondent, v Marine Midland Bank, N. A., Respondent-Appellant.

Opinion:
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied the motions of both parties for summary judgment. Material issues of fact exist whether plaintiff and her husband signed the second promissory note, which was substituted for the first note, in reliance upon material misrepresentations made by defendant. (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Francis, J.— Summary Judgment.) Present—Callahan, A. P. J., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.