Case Name: ASHTON et al. v. HEYDENFELDT et al.
Court: Supreme Court of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1899-04-10
Citations: 6 Cal. Unrep. 279
Docket Number: S. F. No. 1266
Parties: ASHTON et al. v. HEYDENFELDT et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Unreported Cases
Volume: 6
Pages: 279–279

Head Matter:
ASHTON et al. v. HEYDENFELDT et al.
S. F. No. 1266;
April 10, 1899.
56 Pac. 1031.
Appeal—Amendment of Judgment.—The Supreme Court will not amend its judgment directing a demurrer to the complaint to be overruled, by adding thereto a direction that respondents be allowed to answer, as application for leave to answer can be made to the trial court.
Motion to amend the judgment of the supreme court. Motion denied.
For former opinion, see 124 Cal. 14, 56 Pac. 624.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Respondents move to amend the judgment rendered, which directs that the demurrer to the complaint be overruled, by adding thereto a direction that respondents be allowed to answer; but this direction is not necessary, because the court below, if a proper showing be made, will undoubtedly allow the respondents to answer.