Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. William S. McDaniel, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2014-09-24
Citations: 120 A.D.3d 1437
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William S. McDaniel, Appellant.
Judges: Skelos, J.E, Dickerson, Austin and Duffy, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 120
Pages: 1437–1438

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William S. McDaniel, Appellant.
[993 NYS2d 509]

Opinion:
Appeals by the defendant (1) from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Del Giudice, J), rendered August 3, 2009, convicting him of rape in the second degree (two counts), rape in the third degree, and criminal sexual act in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence, and (2), by permission, from an order of the same court dated December 15, 2010, which denied his motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate the judgment of conviction.
Ordered that the judgment and the order are affirmed.
The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant's motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate the judgment of conviction on the ground that he was deprived of the effective assistance of trial counsel. The evidence presented by the defendant failed to demonstrate the absence of strategic or other legitimate explanations for counsel's allegedly deficient conduct (see People v Caban, 5 NY3d 143, 152 [2005]; People v Britton, 49 AD3d 893 [2008]; People v Jordan, 44 AD3d 875 [2007]). The evidence, the law, and the circumstances of the case, viewed in totality as of the time of the representation, reveal that trial counsel provided meaningful representation (see People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 712 [1998]; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).
Skelos, J.E, Dickerson, Austin and Duffy, JJ., concur.