Case Name: Leonardo DRISDEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2017-02-07
Citations: 509 S.W.3d 860
Docket Number: ED 103894
Parties: Leonardo DRISDEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 509
Pages: 860–861

Head Matter:
Leonardo DRISDEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
ED 103894
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Filed: February 7, 2017
Kevin B. Gau, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Gregory L. Barnes, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Leonardo Drisdel appeals from a denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).