Case Name: Larry E. ALEXANDER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-02-28
Citations: 576 So. 2d 350
Docket Number: No. 90-1150
Parties: Larry E. ALEXANDER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: COBB and PETERSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 576
Pages: 350–350

Head Matter:
Larry E. ALEXANDER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 90-1150.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Feb. 28, 1991.
Joseph W. DuRocher, Public Defender, Robert S. Larr and Christine M. Warren, Asst. Public Defenders, Orlando, for appellant.
No Appearance for appellee.

Opinion:
DAUKSCH, Judge.
This is an appeal from an order adjudging appellant guilty of indirect criminal contempt.
As in White v. Buck, 505 So.2d 36 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987), we set aside the judgment because the order fails to follow Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.840(a)(6). The rule requires that there be included in the judgment of guilty a recital of the facts constituting the contempt of which the defendant has been found and adjudicated guilty. This serves to "advise the accused and to permit meaningful appellate review." White v. Buck, 505 So.2d at 37.
The judgment and sentence are set aside and this cause remanded for entry of a proper judgment.
VACATED and REMANDED.
COBB and PETERSON, JJ., concur.