Case Name: In the Interest of C.H. & C.H., Plaintiffs. Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. R.L.H. (Mother), Appellant, E.H. (Father), Defendant, J.B. (Father), Defendant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-06-07
Citations: 164 S.W.3d 174
Docket Number: Nos. WD 64720, 64721
Parties: In the Interest of C.H. & C.H., Plaintiffs. Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. R.L.H. (Mother), Appellant, E.H. (Father), Defendant, J.B. (Father), Defendant.
Judges: Before JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Presiding Judge, PAUL M. SPINDEN, Judge and VICTOR C. HOWARD, Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 164
Pages: 174–175

Head Matter:
In the Interest of C.H. & C.H., Plaintiffs. Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. R.L.H. (Mother), Appellant, E.H. (Father), Defendant, J.B. (Father), Defendant.
Nos. WD 64720, 64721.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
June 7, 2005.
John R. Brage, St. Joseph, MO, for appellant.
Chad Stewart, St. Joseph, MO, for respondent.
David R. Schmitt, St. Joseph, MO, for plaintiffs.
Before JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Presiding Judge, PAUL M. SPINDEN, Judge and VICTOR C. HOWARD, Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
This is a consolidated appeal from two judgments of the Circuit Court of Buchanan County, Juvenile Division, terminating the rights of R.L.H. ("Mother") to parent her two minor children, C.L.H. and C.J.H. We hold that the circuit court properly found grounds for termination of Mother's parental rights to both children pursuant to section 211.447.4(3), RSMo 2000, and that termination was in the best interests of the children. The judgments are affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).