Case Name: Emil Antonoff et al., Plaintiffs, v. Family Television, Inc., et al., Respondents, and Trinity Broadcasting of New York, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1984-11-26
Citations: 105 A.D.2d 823
Docket Number: 
Parties: Emil Antonoff et al., Plaintiffs, v Family Television, Inc., et al., Respondents, and Trinity Broadcasting of New York, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 105
Pages: 823–823

Head Matter:
(November 26, 1984)
Emil Antonoff et al., Plaintiffs, v Family Television, Inc., et al., Respondents, and Trinity Broadcasting of New York, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Opinion:
In a shareholder's derivative action, defendant Trinity Broadcasting of New York, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Slifkin, J.), dated June 4,1984, which denied its motion for summary judgment and for dismissal of the cross claim of defendant Family Television, Inc.
Order affirmed, with costs.
The presence of triable issues of fact mandates denial of summary judgment (Krupp v Aetna Life & Cas. Co., 103 AD2d 252). Mollen, P. J., Titone, Thompson and O'Connor, JJ., concur.