Case Name: Adrian Ruiz GARCIA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-06-01
Citations: 380 F. App'x 736
Docket Number: No. 06-71286
Parties: Adrian Ruiz GARCIA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 380
Pages: 736–736

Head Matter:
Adrian Ruiz GARCIA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 06-71286.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 25, 2010.
Filed June 1, 2010.
Beth Feinberg, Marc Van Der Hout, Van Der Hout, Brigagliano & Nightingale, LLP, San Francisco, CA, Stacy Tolchin, Van Der Hout Brigagliano & Nightingale, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.
R. Alexander Goring, Esquire, Oil, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Adrian Ruiz Garcia, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge's decision denying his application for suspension of deportation. We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA's discretionary determination that Ruiz Garcia failed to make the requisite showing of extreme hardship to be eligible for suspension of deportation. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 929-30 (9th Cir.2005); Kalaw v. INS, 133 F.3d 1147, 1151-52 (9th Cir.1997), superseded by statute on other grounds as stated in Trejo-Mejia v. Holder, 593 F.3d 913 (9th Cir.2010). In addition, we lack jurisdiction over Ruiz Garcia's contentions that the BIA failed to consider the hardship evidence cumulatively and disregarded precedent because they are not supported by the record and do not amount to colorable constitutional claims. See Mendez-Castro v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 975, 980 (9th Cir.2009).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.