Case Name: The ESTATE OF B.I.C., a minor child, deceased; Larry F. Crosetto, individually and as next friend of C.S.C., a minor child; Mary Lou Crosetto, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Linda GILLEN, individually and as an agent of the Kansas Social and Rehabilitation Services, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-03-19
Citations: 710 F.3d 1168
Docket Number: No. 11-3219
Parties: The ESTATE OF B.I.C., a minor child, deceased; Larry F. Crosetto, individually and as next friend of C.S.C., a minor child; Mary Lou Crosetto, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Linda GILLEN, individually and as an agent of the Kansas Social and Rehabilitation Services, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before KELLY, HOLLOWAY, and MATHESON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 710
Pages: 1168–1176

Head Matter:
The ESTATE OF B.I.C., a minor child, deceased; Larry F. Crosetto, individually and as next friend of C.S.C., a minor child; Mary Lou Crosetto, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Linda GILLEN, individually and as an agent of the Kansas Social and Rehabilitation Services, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 11-3219.
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
March 19, 2013.
Randall Rathbun, (and Molly McMurray of Depew, Gillen, Rathbun & Mclnteer, LC, with him on the briefs), Wichita, KS, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
Gerald Green, (and Maureen A. Redeker of Gilliland & Hayes, P.A., with him on the brief), Manhattan, KS, for Defendant-Ap-pellee.
Before KELLY, HOLLOWAY, and MATHESON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
This matter is before the court on the appellee's Petition For Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc. We also have a response from the appellants. Upon consideration by the original panel, we grant panel rehearing in part. The clerk is directed to withdraw our original opinion dated December 19, 2012, and to substitute the amended version attached to this order. The request for panel rehearing is granted to the extent of the amendments made to our original decision, but is otherwise denied.
The request for rehearing en banc, the response, and the panel's revised opinion were transmitted to all of the judges of the court who are in regular active service. As no member of the panel and no judge in regular active service on the court requested that the court be polled with regard to en banc consideration of the amended opinion, the suggestion for en banc rehearing is denied.