Case Name: Christopher GIAN-CURSIO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee; Bernard M. EPSTEIN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1966-10-12
Citations: 196 So. 2d 105
Docket Number: Nos. 35058, 35050
Parties: Christopher GIAN-CURSIO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. Bernard M. EPSTEIN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: THORNAL, C. J., and O’CONNELL, CALDWELL, ERVIN and SEBRING (Ret.), JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 196
Pages: 105–105

Head Matter:
Christopher GIAN-CURSIO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. Bernard M. EPSTEIN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Nos. 35058, 35050.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Oct. 12, 1966.
Rehearing Denied Nov. 29, 1966.
Manners & Amoon, Miami, for Christopher Gian-Cursio.
Sam Daniels, Miami, for Bernard M. Epstein.
Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Herbert P. Benn, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We granted certiorari and have heard oral argument. The decisions under review are Gian-Cursio v. State, and Epstein v. State, Fla.App., 180 So.2d 396. Our study of the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there is no jurisdictional conflict of decisions and that the writ was therefore improvidently issued and should be discharged. See, Hampton v. State, 50 Fla. 55, 39 So. 421, and, State v. Heines, 144 Fla. 272, 197 So. 787.
It is so ordered.
THORNAL, C. J., and O'CONNELL, CALDWELL, ERVIN and SEBRING (Ret.), JJ., concur.
ROBERTS, J., dissents with opinion.
DREW, J., dissents and agrees with ROBERTS, J.