Case Name: In the Matter of Richard Flowers et al., Appellants, v. James Sullivan et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 1.); In the Matter of Richard Flowers et al., Appellants, v. James Sullivan et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 2.)
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1990-02-15
Citations: 75 N.Y.2d 850
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Richard Flowers et al., Appellants, v James Sullivan et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Richard Flowers et al., Appellants, v James Sullivan et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 2.)
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 75
Pages: 850–850

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Richard Flowers et al., Appellants, v James Sullivan et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Richard Flowers et al., Appellants, v James Sullivan et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 2.)
Submitted October 2, 1989;
decided February 15, 1990

Opinion:
On the court's own motion, appeal, insofar as taken by petitioners Flowers and Jefferson, dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the issues raised on the appeal have become moot as to them. Motion for assignment of new counsel granted only to the extent that present counsel is relieved of her assignment.