Case Name: Francesco Brugnano et al., Appellants, v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., et al., Respondents; Olympia & York Tower B Company et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Forest Electric Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent; JWP Forest Electric Corp., Fourth-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v. O & Y WFC Tower A Company et al., Fourth-Party Defendants-Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1995-11-01
Citations: 86 N.Y.2d 880
Docket Number: 
Parties: Francesco Brugnano et al., Appellants, v Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., et al., Respondents. Olympia & York Tower B Company et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents, v Forest Electric Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent. JWP Forest Electric Corp., Fourth-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v O & Y WFC Tower A Company et al., Fourth-Party Defendants-Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 86
Pages: 880–881

Head Matter:
Francesco Brugnano et al., Appellants, v Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., et al., Respondents. Olympia & York Tower B Company et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents, v Forest Electric Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent. JWP Forest Electric Corp., Fourth-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v O & Y WFC Tower A Company et al., Fourth-Party Defendants-Respondents.
Submitted July 24, 1995;
decided November 1, 1995

Opinion:
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeál from that part of the Appellate Division order that affirmed so much of Supreme Court's order as denied plaintiffs' motion to amend their bill of particulars, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied, with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements.