Case Name: Betty Porter ALLEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James Anthony PERRI, M.D.; Piedmont Emergency Medicine Associates, PA, a dissolved North Carolina Corporation; Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority, d/b/a Carolinas Healthcare System; Carolinas Medical Center-University, a facility of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-03-31
Citations: 420 F. App'x 278
Docket Number: No. 11-1018
Parties: Betty Porter ALLEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James Anthony PERRI, M.D.; Piedmont Emergency Medicine Associates, PA, a dissolved North Carolina Corporation; Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority, d/b/a Carolinas Healthcare System; Carolinas Medical Center-University, a facility of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 420
Pages: 278–278

Head Matter:
Betty Porter ALLEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James Anthony PERRI, M.D.; Piedmont Emergency Medicine Associates, PA, a dissolved North Carolina Corporation; Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority, d/b/a Carolinas Healthcare System; Carolinas Medical Center-University, a facility of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 11-1018.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 14, 2011.
Decided: March 31, 2011.
Betty Porter Allen, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Betty Porter Allen appeals the district court's order granting leave to proceed without prepayment of fees and dismissing this action alleging medical malpractice and negligence for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Allen v. Perri, No. 3:10-cv-00666-GCM (W.D.N.C. Jan. 4, 2011). We deny the motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.