Case Name: William FRANGESH and Beverly Frangesh, Appellants, v. Harry SCHWARTZ and Marsha Lynn Schwartz, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-09-06
Citations: 548 So. 2d 299
Docket Number: No. 89-0292
Parties: William FRANGESH and Beverly Frangesh, Appellants, v. Harry SCHWARTZ and Marsha Lynn Schwartz, Appellees.
Judges: HERSEY, C.J., and DELL, J., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 548
Pages: 299–300

Head Matter:
William FRANGESH and Beverly Frangesh, Appellants, v. Harry SCHWARTZ and Marsha Lynn Schwartz, Appellees.
No. 89-0292.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Sept. 6, 1989.
Joseph W. Gibson, Jr., and Stanley J. Bartel, P.A., Miami, for appellants.
Anthony J. Titone of Titone, Roarke & Titone, Lauderhill, for appellee-Harry Schwartz.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellants moved to intervene in appel-lees' dissolution proceeding to establish a lien against the marital home. Fields v. Fields, 35 So.2d 722 (Fla.1948) and Picchi v. Picchi, 100 So.2d 627 (Fla.1958), cited by appellants, do not support the argument that the trial court abused its discretion when it denied their motion to intervene. In Fields, the wife moved to bring in aft additional party in an effort to clear title to a parcel of marital property. In Picchi, the wife sought to join two corporations she claimed were the husband's alter-ego. Here, neither party sought joinder of appellants. Based on the record before us, we hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied appellants' motion to intervene. Accordingly, we affirm.
AFFIRMED.
HERSEY, C.J., and DELL, J., concur.
GLICKSTEIN, J., concurs specially with opinion.