Case Name: Brittany BOYD, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. YOUNG AMERICA INSURANCE, Defendant/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2009-12-15
Citations: 301 S.W.3d 555
Docket Number: No. ED 92999
Parties: Brittany BOYD, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. YOUNG AMERICA INSURANCE, Defendant/Respondent.
Judges: Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., and PATRICIA COHEN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 301
Pages: 555–555

Head Matter:
Brittany BOYD, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. YOUNG AMERICA INSURANCE, Defendant/Respondent.
No. ED 92999.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Dec. 15, 2009.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 21, 2010.
Robert S. Merlin, Clayton, MO, for Plaintiff/Appellant.
Robert L. Nussbaumer, St. Louis, MO, for Defendant/Respondent.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., and PATRICIA COHEN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Brittany Boyd (Appellant) appeals from the summary judgment entered by the trial court in favor of Young America Insurance (Respondent) on Appellant's claims for breach of contract and vexatious refusal to pay against Respondent, based on Respondent's failure to provide uninsured motorist coverage under Appellant's mother's (Insured) policy, for injuries Appellant sustained while driving Insured's car. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that Respondent is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Tinch v. State Farm Ins. Co., 16 S.W.3d 747, 750 (Mo.App. E.D.2000). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).