Case Name: Nyland (CF8) Ltd., Respondent-Appellant, v. Joachim F. Von Grumme-Douglas et al., Appellants-Respondents. Cushman & Wakefield, Inc., Intervenor-Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1989-05-23
Citations: 150 A.D.2d 269
Docket Number: 
Parties: Nyland (CF8) Ltd., Respondent-Appellant, v Joachim F. Von Grumme-Douglas et al., Appellants-Respondents. Cushman & Wakefield, Inc., Intervenor-Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 150
Pages: 269–269

Head Matter:
Nyland (CF8) Ltd., Respondent-Appellant, v Joachim F. Von Grumme-Douglas et al., Appellants-Respondents. Cushman & Wakefield, Inc., Intervenor-Respondent.

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ethel Danzig, J.) entered on October 24, 1988, unanimously affirmed for reasons stated by Ethel Danzig, J., without costs and without disbursements. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Kassal, Rosenberger and Ellerin, JJ.