Case Name: Beverly A. CLAUGHTON, Petitioner, v. Edward N. CLAUGHTON and the Honorable Richard S. Fuller, Circuit Judge, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, In and For Dade County, Florida, Respondents
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1984-07-10
Citations: 452 So. 2d 1073
Docket Number: No. 84-952
Parties: Beverly A. CLAUGHTON, Petitioner, v. Edward N. CLAUGHTON and the Honorable Richard S. Fuller, Circuit Judge, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, In and For Dade County, Florida, Respondents.
Judges: Before NESBITT, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 452
Pages: 1073–1074

Head Matter:
Beverly A. CLAUGHTON, Petitioner, v. Edward N. CLAUGHTON and the Honorable Richard S. Fuller, Circuit Judge, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, In and For Dade County, Florida, Respondents.
No. 84-952.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 10, 1984.
Daniels & Hicks and Louise H. MeMur-ray, Paige & Catlin, Miami, for petitioner.
Sibley, Giblin, Levenson & Glaser and Allan M. Glaser, Miami Beach, for respondents.
Before NESBITT, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We cannot on the record before us conclude that the statements set forth in the final judgment upon which the petition er based her application to disqualify the trial judge were so unrelated to the issues being tried as to constitute other than adverse judicial rulings which under well-settled law are not a basis for disqualification for bias or prejudice. See Wilson v. Renfroe, 91 So.2d 857 (Fla.1957); State ex rel. Locke v. Sandler, 156 Fla. 136, 23 So.2d 276 (1945). Whether such rulings were correct or not is a matter to be determined on appeal from the final judgment.
Accordingly, the petition for writ of prohibition is
Denied.