Case Name: Susan Cohen et al., Appellants, v. Herbal Concepts, Inc., Defendant, and The Hearst Corporation et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1984-03-08
Citations: 100 A.D.2d 175
Docket Number: 
Parties: Susan Cohen et al., Appellants, v Herbal Concepts, Inc., Defendant, and The Hearst Corporation et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 100
Pages: 175–191

Head Matter:
Susan Cohen et al., Appellants, v Herbal Concepts, Inc., Defendant, and The Hearst Corporation et al., Respondents.
First Department,
March 8, 1984
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Gair, Gair & Conason, P. C. (Herman Schmertz of counsel), for appellants.
Lola Sullivan Reynolds, Richard H. Sugarman and Thomas A. Bisdale for The Hearst Corporation, respondent.
Sabin, Bermant & Blau (Ralph P. Huber and Nancy K. Nadler of counsel), for The Conde Nast Publications, Inc., respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alvin Klein, J.), entered on June 24, 1982, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs and without disbursements, the motion denied and the first and second causes of action reinstated.