Case Name: In the Matter of the Application of Charles H. Stowell, Petitioner, against Trustees Santoro, Meighan, Corrigan, Jackson, and Mayor Johnson, Constituting the Board of Trustees of the Village of Mamaroneck, and F. H. Bull, Jr., Village Clerk, Respondents, for a Review of a Determination of Said Board of Trustees in a Hearing Entitled: In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings against Charles H. Stowell, Police Chief of the Village of Mamaroneck, New York
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1938-06-24
Citations: 254 A.D. 903
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Application of Charles H. Stowell, Petitioner, against Trustees Santoro, Meighan, Corrigan, Jackson, and Mayor Johnson, Constituting the Board of Trustees of the Village of Mamaroneck, and F. H. Bull, Jr., Village Clerk, Respondents, for a Review of a Determination of Said Board of Trustees in a Hearing Entitled: In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings against Charles H. Stowell, Police Chief of the Village of Mamaroneck, New York.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 254
Pages: 903–903

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Application of Charles H. Stowell, Petitioner, against Trustees Santoro, Meighan, Corrigan, Jackson, and Mayor Johnson, Constituting the Board of Trustees of the Village of Mamaroneck, and F. H. Bull, Jr., Village Clerk, Respondents, for a Review of a Determination of Said Board of Trustees in a Hearing Entitled: In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings against Charles H. Stowell, Police Chief of the Village of Mamaroneck, New York.

Opinion:
Proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, for a review of the determination of the board of trustees of the village of Mamaroneck in dismissing the petitioner from the office of police chief after a hearing on stated charges. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs. In reaching this determination the bribery charge has not been considered. There is ample evidence in the record to sustain the other charges. Davis, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents. The first charge had been disposed of effectively on a previous trial. The second charge should be remitted to the trustees for retrial. (People ex rel, Gilson v. Gibbons, 231 N. Y. 171.)