Case Name: STATE OF NEW JERSEY (BOROUGH OF FREEHOLD), PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TOMAR KOHNS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1972-11-15
Citations: 121 N.J. Super. 284
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF NEW JERSEY (BOROUGH OF FREEHOLD), PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TOMAR KOHNS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 121
Pages: 284–285

Head Matter:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY (BOROUGH OF FREEHOLD), PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TOMAR KOHNS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued October 31, 1972
Decided November 15, 1972.
Before Judges Labrecque, Kolovsky and Matthews.
Mr. Michael D. Schottland argued the cause for appellant Tomar Kohns (Messrs. Chamlin & Schottland, attorneys).
Mr. Jerry Sokol argued the cause for respondent Borough of Freehold.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Defendant was convicted in the Municipal Court of Borough of Freehold of violating a borough ordinance. On appeal to the Monmouth County Court, after a de novo trial on the record below, his conviction was reversed. He appeals from an order denying his motion to be permitted to recover from the borough, as costs, the fee for filing his appeal and the cost of the transcript of the municipal court hearing.
We affirm the order of the County Court. In the absence of a statute providing otherwise, the State is not liable for costs, incurred in criminal prosecutions. 20 Am. Jur. 2d, Costs, § 107 at 83 (1965). See also State v. Borg, 9 N. J. Misc. 261, 153 A. 374 (Sup. Ct. 1931). We find R. 3:23-8(e), cited by defendant, to be inapposite.
Affirmed.