Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Steve WASHINGTON, Appellant; Steve WASHINGTON, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1992-03-17
Citations: 826 S.W.2d 408
Docket Number: Nos. 57730, 60182
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Steve WASHINGTON, Appellant. Steve WASHINGTON, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 826
Pages: 408–409

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Steve WASHINGTON, Appellant. Steve WASHINGTON, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 57730, 60182.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
March 17, 1992.
Melinda K. Pendergraph, Columbia and Kathleen G. Green, St. Louis, for appellant.
William L. Webster, Atty. Gen. and Robert P. Sass, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant, Steve Washington, appeals from his conviction, after a jury trial, for unlawful possession of a controlled substance (phencyclidine). He was sentenced as a prior offender to imprisonment for seven years. He also appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing.
We have reviewed the record on direct appeal. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. Defendant's conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.-25(b).
We have also reviewed the record with regard to the trial court's denial of defendant's Rule 29.15 motion. The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. A written opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).