Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas Bradford ROBINSON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-04-01
Citations: 324 F. App'x 559
Docket Number: No. 07-50193
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas Bradford ROBINSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: SCHROEDER, KLEINFELD, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 324
Pages: 559–560

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas Bradford ROBINSON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-50193.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 26, 2008.
Filed April 1, 2009.
Michael J. Raphael, Esq., USLA-Office of the U.S. Attorney Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, Sheri N. Pym, Esq., USR-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Riverside, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Amanda F. Benedict, Esq., Attorney at Law, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: SCHROEDER, KLEINFELD, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Thomas Bradford Robinson appeals from the 151-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Robinson contends that his sentence is unreasonably long in light of his age, lack of violent history, and efforts at rehabilitation. In light of the totality of the circumstances, including Robinson's extensive criminal history, his bottom-of-the-Guidelines range sentence is reasonable. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 995 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.