Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Richard Hayes HINTON, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1967-01-06
Citations: 370 F.2d 570
Docket Number: No. 10586
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Richard Hayes HINTON, Appellant.
Judges: Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and WINTER and CRAVEN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 370
Pages: 570–570

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Richard Hayes HINTON, Appellant.
No. 10586.
United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.
Argued Dec. 8, 1966.
Decided Jan. 6, 1967.
Certiorari Denied March 13, 1967.
See 87 S.Ct. 1031.
Edwin M. Young, Richmond, Va., and Vernon F. Daughtridge, Wilson, N. C., for appellant.
Charles S. Porter, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty. (Terrell L. Glenn, U. S. Atty., on brief), for appellee.
Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and WINTER and CRAVEN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
This appeal presents the identical question considered by the Court in United States v. Worley, 4 Cir., 368 F.2d 625 (decided November 3, 1966.) We affirm for the reasons stated by us in Worley.
Affirmed.