Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Neil POLLARD, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-01-23
Citations: 25 F. App'x 650
Docket Number: No. 00-50356. D.C. No. CR-95-01104-CBM
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Neil POLLARD, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 25
Pages: 650–650

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Neil POLLARD, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 00-50356. D.C. No. CR-95-01104-CBM.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 14, 2002.
Decided Jan. 23, 2002.
Before KLEINFELD, HAWKINS, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Robert Neil Pollard appeals his conviction by guilty plea and sentence for one count of mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341. Pollard's attorney has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), on the ground that she failed to discover any arguable issues on appeal. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), reveals no arguable issues.
Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.