Case Name: PAUL BADEWITZ, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. WEST JERSEY AND SEASHORE RAILROAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1909-06-14
Citations: 77 N.J.L. 800
Docket Number: 
Parties: PAUL BADEWITZ, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. WEST JERSEY AND SEASHORE RAILROAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Judges: For affirmance—Tins Ciiaxcellou, Gakiusox, Swayze, Tuexchaud, Paukeu, .Beugex, Vookiiees, Mixtuux, Bogeut, Ykeoexhuugu, VkooM, Guay, Dill, Coxgdox, J.J. 14.
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 77
Pages: 800–801

Head Matter:
PAUL BADEWITZ, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. WEST JERSEY AND SEASHORE RAILROAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Submitted March 23, 1909
Decided June 14, 1909.
On error to the Supreme Court.
For the plaintiff in error, Gashill & Gashill.
For the defendant in error, David O. Watkins.

Opinion:
PER CüRlAM.
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given by Chief Justice Gumrnere in 40 Vroom 208.
For affirmance—Tins Ciiaxcellou, Gakiusox, Swayze, Tuexchaud, Paukeu, .Beugex, Vookiiees, Mixtuux, Bogeut, Ykeoexhuugu, VkooM, Guay, Dill, Coxgdox, J.J. 14.
For reversal—None.