Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Vernon BEAL, Appellant; Vernon BEAL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-03-28
Citations: 895 S.W.2d 635
Docket Number: Nos. 64068, 66483
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Vernon BEAL, Appellant. Vernon BEAL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANE, P.J., CRANDALL and DOWD, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 895
Pages: 635–635

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Vernon BEAL, Appellant. Vernon BEAL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 64068, 66483.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
March 28, 1995.
Robert E. Steele, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Fernando Bermudez, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before CRANE, P.J., CRANDALL and DOWD, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant Vernon Beal appeals after a jury convicted him of attempting to steal a motor vehicle. Defendant also filed a notice of appeal from the motion court's denial of post-conviction relief but abandoned his appeal by not briefing any points of error relating to the motion court's order. We affirm.
We find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion and affirm by written summary order. Rule 30.25(b). A memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision has been issued to the parties for their use only.