Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Derwin COLES, a/k/a Woods, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-08-05
Citations: 441 F. App'x 1001
Docket Number: No. 09-6654
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Derwin COLES, a/k/a Woods, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 441
Pages: 1001–1001

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Derwin COLES, a/k/a Woods, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-6654.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 15, 2011.
Decided: Aug. 5, 2011.
Derwin Coles, Appellant Pro se. John J. Frail, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Derwin Coles appeals the district court's order granting in part and denying in part his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Coles, No. 2:01-cr-00254-3 (S.D.W.Va. Mar. 19, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.