Case Name: RUMSEY INDIAN RANCHERIA OF WINTUN INDIANS; Table Mountain Rancheria; Cher-Ae Heights Indian Community of the Trinidad Rancheria; San Manual Band of Mission Indians, Viejas Reservation of the Capitan Grande Band of Diegueno Mission Indians and Hopland Band of Porno Indians; Barona Band of Mission Indians; Sycuan Band of Mission Indians; Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Pete WILSON, Governor; State of California, Defendants-Appellants; RUMSEY INDIAN RANCHERIA OF WINTUN INDIANS; Table Mountain Rancheria; Cher-Ae Heights Indian Community of the Trinidad Rancheria; San Manual Band of Mission Indians, Viejas Reservation of the Capitan Grande Band of Diegueno Mission Indians and Hopland Band of Pomo Indians; Wintun Indians; San Manual Band of Mission Indians; Cabazon Band of Mission Indians; The Santa Ynez Band of Chumash Mission Indians of the Santa Ysabel Reservation, California; Viejas Reservation of the Capitan Grande Band of Diegueno Mission Indians; San Manual Band of Mission Indians; The Hopland Band of Pomo Indians; The Sycuan Band of Mission Indians; The Morongo Band of Mission Indians; The Santa Rosa Band of Tache Indians; The Cachil Dehe Band of Wintun Indians of the Colusa Indian Community; The Soboba Band of Cahuilla Mission Indians; The Robinson Band of Pomo Indians; The Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians; and The Barona Group of the Capitan Grande Band of Mission Indians, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants, v. Pete WILSON, Governor; State of California, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1994-11-15
Citations: 64 F.3d 1250
Docket Number: Nos. 93-16609, 93-16745
Parties: RUMSEY INDIAN RANCHERIA OF WINTUN INDIANS; Table Mountain Rancheria; Cher-Ae Heights Indian Community of the Trinidad Rancheria; San Manual Band of Mission Indians, Viejas Reservation of the Capitan Grande Band of Diegueno Mission Indians and Hopland Band of Porno Indians; Barona Band of Mission Indians; Sycuan Band of Mission Indians; Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Pete WILSON, Governor; State of California, Defendants-Appellants. RUMSEY INDIAN RANCHERIA OF WINTUN INDIANS; Table Mountain Rancheria; Cher-Ae Heights Indian Community of the Trinidad Rancheria; San Manual Band of Mission Indians, Viejas Reservation of the Capitan Grande Band of Diegueno Mission Indians and Hopland Band of Pomo Indians; Wintun Indians; San Manual Band of Mission Indians; Cabazon Band of Mission Indians; The Santa Ynez Band of Chumash Mission Indians of the Santa Ysabel Reservation, California; Viejas Reservation of the Capitan Grande Band of Diegueno Mission Indians; San Manual Band of Mission Indians; The Hopland Band of Pomo Indians; The Sycuan Band of Mission Indians; The Morongo Band of Mission Indians; The Santa Rosa Band of Tache Indians; The Cachil Dehe Band of Wintun Indians of the Colusa Indian Community; The Soboba Band of Cahuilla Mission Indians; The Robinson Band of Pomo Indians; The Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians; and The Barona Group of the Capitan Grande Band of Mission Indians, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants, v. Pete WILSON, Governor; State of California, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees.
Judges: Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge; O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge; KELLEHER, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 64
Pages: 1250–1260

Head Matter:
RUMSEY INDIAN RANCHERIA OF WINTUN INDIANS; Table Mountain Rancheria; Cher-Ae Heights Indian Community of the Trinidad Rancheria; San Manual Band of Mission Indians, Viejas Reservation of the Capitan Grande Band of Diegueno Mission Indians and Hopland Band of Porno Indians; Barona Band of Mission Indians; Sycuan Band of Mission Indians; Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Pete WILSON, Governor; State of California, Defendants-Appellants. RUMSEY INDIAN RANCHERIA OF WINTUN INDIANS; Table Mountain Rancheria; Cher-Ae Heights Indian Community of the Trinidad Rancheria; San Manual Band of Mission Indians, Viejas Reservation of the Capitan Grande Band of Diegueno Mission Indians and Hopland Band of Pomo Indians; Wintun Indians; San Manual Band of Mission Indians; Cabazon Band of Mission Indians; The Santa Ynez Band of Chumash Mission Indians of the Santa Ysabel Reservation, California; Viejas Reservation of the Capitan Grande Band of Diegueno Mission Indians; San Manual Band of Mission Indians; The Hopland Band of Pomo Indians; The Sycuan Band of Mission Indians; The Morongo Band of Mission Indians; The Santa Rosa Band of Tache Indians; The Cachil Dehe Band of Wintun Indians of the Colusa Indian Community; The Soboba Band of Cahuilla Mission Indians; The Robinson Band of Pomo Indians; The Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians; and The Barona Group of the Capitan Grande Band of Mission Indians, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants, v. Pete WILSON, Governor; State of California, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees.
Nos. 93-16609, 93-16745.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted May 10, 1994.
Decided Nov. 15, 1994.
As Amended on Denial of Rehearing and Rejection of Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc Aug. 11, 1995.
Howard L. Dickstein, Dickstein & Merin, Sacramento, CA; Art Bunce, Escondido, CA; George Forman, Alexander & Karshmer, Berkeley, CA, for plaintiffs-appellees-cross-appellants.
Manuel M. Medeiros, Deputy Atty. Gen., Sacramento, CA, for defendants-appellants-cross-appellees.
Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge; O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge; KELLEHER, District Judge.
The Honorable Robert J. Kelleher, Senior United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
Opinion by Judge O'SCANNLAIN; Concurrence by Chief Judge WALLACE; Dissent to Order by Judge CANBY; Concurrence to Dissent by Judges FERGUSON and NORRIS.
ORDER
The opinion filed on November 15, 1994 at slip op. 13873 is amended as follows:
The panel has voted to deny the petitions for rehearing. Chief Judge Wallace and Judge O'Scannlain have voted to reject the suggestions for rehearing en banc, and Judge Kelleher has so recommended.
The full court was advised of the suggestions for rehearing en banc. An active judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed.R.AppJP. 35.
The petitions for rehearing are DENIED and the suggestions for rehearing en banc are REJECTED.