Case Name: Cesar ROMERO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Linda SANDERS, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-10-05
Citations: 452 F. App'x 732
Docket Number: No. 10-56249
Parties: Cesar ROMERO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Linda SANDERS, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before: HAWKINS, SILVERMAN, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 452
Pages: 732–732

Head Matter:
Cesar ROMERO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Linda SANDERS, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 10-56249.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 27, 2011.
Filed Oct. 5, 2011.
Cesar Romero, Lompoc, CA, pro se.
Margaret L. Carter, Allen W. Chiu, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.
Before: HAWKINS, SILVERMAN, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Cesar Romero appeals pro se from the district court's judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Romero contends that, as part of his plea bargain, the government promised that time served as part of a state sentence prior to being sentenced in federal court would be credited toward his federal sentence. This contention is not supported by the record.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.