Case Name: Jones et al. v. Darby
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1933-09-14
Citations: 177 Ga. 625
Docket Number: No. 9235
Parties: Jones et al. v. Darby.
Judges: All the Justices concur.
Reporter: Georgia Reports
Volume: 177
Pages: 625–626

Head Matter:
Jones et al. v. Darby.
No. 9235.
September 14, 1933.

Opinion:
Atkinson, J.
A motion was made to dismiss the writ of error, on the ground that, since the decision complained of, the question involved in the case has become moot because of certain alleged occurrences rendering a decision unnecessary. The plaintiffs in error, in answer to a rule issued by this court to show cause why the motion to dismiss should not be sustained, having admitted the truth of the allegations of fact relied on as ground for dismissal, and it appearing therefrom that the question for decision is moot, the
Writ of error is dismissed.
All the Justices concur.
Saffold, Sharpe & Saffold, for plaintiffs.
B. P. Jackson and Lankford & Rogers, for defendant.