Case Name: CRARY, Respondent, v. DIMOCK et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1900-02-08
Citations: 62 N.Y.S. 1134
Docket Number: 
Parties: CRARY, Respondent, v. DIMOCK et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 62
Pages: 1134–1134

Head Matter:
CRARY, Respondent, v. DIMOCK et al., Appellants.
(Supreme Coui;t, Appellate Term.
February 8, 1900.)
Action by Jessie D. Crary against Julian A. Dimock and another. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal. Affirmed. Bradbury C. Chetwood, for appellants. Sidney H. Stuart, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
No question of law is presented for our review, and, as the conflict of fact'was correctly disposed of below, it follows that the judgment must be affirmed. Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent.