Case Name: GILFORD v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1930-03-12
Citations: 27 S.W.2d 169
Docket Number: No. 13082
Parties: GILFORD v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 27
Pages: 169–170

Head Matter:
GILFORD v. STATE.
No. 13082.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
March 12, 1930.
Rehearing Denied April 23, 1930.
B. A. Carter, of San Angelo, for appellant.
A. A. Dawson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
MORROW, P. J.
Aggravated assault is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the county jail for a period of sixty days.'
The alleged assault was committed upon the wife of the accused. She and several other witnesses testified to facts sufficient to support the verdict. The assault was denied by the appellant. The conflict of evidence was settled by the verdict of the jury.
There are no complaints of the rulings of the trial court brought forward by bills of exceptions. Attempt is made by bringing forward the motion for new trial to invoke the consideration of the rulings of the court upon the admission and rejection of evidence. Such matters, in order to warrant consid eration on appeal, must come by bills of exceptions. See Holliday v. State, 100 Tex. Cr. R. 226, 273 S. W. 250; Madsen v. State, 95 Tex. Cr. R. 439, 254 S. W. 955; Claybrook v. State, 95 Tex. Cr. R. 88, 252 S. W. 766; Anderson v. State, 95 Tex. Cr. R. 346, 254 S. W. 986.
Tbe judgment is affirmed.