Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nicandro PINEDA-ARREGUIN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-01-12
Citations: 217 F. App'x 685
Docket Number: No. 06-30224
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nicandro PINEDA-ARREGUIN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: ALARCÓN, HALL, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 217
Pages: 685–685

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nicandro PINEDA-ARREGUIN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-30224.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 8, 2007.
Filed Jan. 12, 2007.
James P. Hagarty, Esq., USYA-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Yakima, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Tracy Staab, FPDWA-Federal Public Defender’s Office (Eastern WA & ID), Spokane, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: ALARCÓN, HALL, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Nicandro Pineda-Arreguin appeals from his 120-month sentence imposed following a guilty plea to possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Pineda-Arreguin contends that the district court improperly denied him a "safety valve" sentence reduction pursuant to United States Sentencing Guidelines section 5C1.2. Upon review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not clearly err in determining that Pineda-Arreguin failed to meet his burden of showing that he had provided truthful and complete information about his offense. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f); United States v. Ajugwo, 82 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir.1996).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.