Case Name: Lesley BARR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VIRGINIA ALCOHOL BEVERAGE CONTROL (VABC); Laura Kate Sheehan, Regional Manager (VABC); Beverly Anderson, Employee (VABC), Defendants-Appellees, Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Incorporated, Amicus Supporting Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-02-01
Citations: 710 F. App'x 141
Docket Number: No. 17-2016
Parties: Lesley BARR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VIRGINIA ALCOHOL BEVERAGE CONTROL (VABC); Laura Kate Sheehan, Regional Manager (VABC); Beverly Anderson, Employee (VABC), Defendants-Appellees, Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Incorporated, Amicus Supporting Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 710
Pages: 141–142

Head Matter:
Lesley BARR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VIRGINIA ALCOHOL BEVERAGE CONTROL (VABC); Laura Kate Sheehan, Regional Manager (VABC); Beverly Anderson, Employee (VABC), Defendants-Appellees, Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Incorporated, Amicus Supporting Appellant.
No. 17-2016
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: January 30, 2018
Decided: February 1, 2018
Lesley Barr, Appellant Pro Se. Sarah Flynn Robb, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Omar Francisco Gonzalez-Pagan, New York, New York, Sharon M. McGowan, Washington, D.C., Gregory R. Nevins, LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND, INC., Atlanta, Georgia, for Amicus Curiae.
Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Lesley Barr seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing her civil rights action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.
Parties are accorded 30 days after the entry of the district court's final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). "[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement." Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007).
The district court's order was entered on the docket on July 28, 2017. The notice of appeal was filed on August 30, 2017. Because Barr failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We deny amicus counsel's mo tion to file a reply brief. We grant Barr's motion to supplement, the record. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED