Case Name: Howard M. FITZGERALD; Patricia A. Fitzgerald, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF PETERSBURG, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-02-18
Citations: 592 F. App'x 227
Docket Number: No. 14-2077
Parties: Howard M. FITZGERALD; Patricia A. Fitzgerald, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF PETERSBURG, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 592
Pages: 227–227

Head Matter:
Howard M. FITZGERALD; Patricia A. Fitzgerald, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF PETERSBURG, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 14-2077.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 12, 2015.
Decided: Feb. 18, 2015.
Howard M. and Patricia A. Fitzgerald, Appellants Pro Se. Maurice Scott Fisher, Jr., Harman, Claytor, Corrigan & Well-man, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Howard M. and Patricia A. Fitzgerald appeal the district court's orders denying their motions for reconsideration. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fitzgerald v. City of Petersburg, No. 3:14-cv-00333-HEH (E.D.Va. Aug. 12, 2014 & Sept. 9, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.