Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Conrad Joseph Old HORN, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-10-28
Citations: 456 F. App'x 664
Docket Number: No. 11-30024
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Conrad Joseph Old HORN, Jr., Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: TROTT, GOULD, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 456
Pages: 664–664

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Conrad Joseph Old HORN, Jr., Defendant—Appellant.
No. 11-30024.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 25, 2011.
Filed Oct. 28, 2011.
Eric Vincent Carroll, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Leif Johnson, Assistant U.S., USBI — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Billings, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Robert Henry Branom, Jr., Assistant Federal Public Defender, FDMT — Federal Defenders of Montana, Great Falls, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: TROTT, GOULD, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Conrad Joseph Old Horn, Jr., appeals from the 51-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for assault resulting in serious bodily injury, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1153, 113(a)(6). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Old Horn contends that the district court erred by refusing to grant him a two-level reduction for acceptance of responsibility. In light of the record before the district court, there was no clear error. See United States v. Hopper, 27 F.3d 378, 381-82 (9th Cir.1994).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.