Case Name: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, an insurance corporation, and Tire Kingdom, Inc., a Florida corporation, jointly and severally, Appellants, v. William SAUER, individually, and William Sauer, as parent and next friend of Casey L. Sauer, a minor, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-04-05
Citations: 652 So. 2d 514
Docket Number: Nos. 94-1859, 94-1860
Parties: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, an insurance corporation, and Tire Kingdom, Inc., a Florida corporation, jointly and severally, Appellants, v. William SAUER, individually, and William Sauer, as parent and next friend of Casey L. Sauer, a minor, Appellee.
Judges: WARNER, KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 652
Pages: 514–514

Head Matter:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, an insurance corporation, and Tire Kingdom, Inc., a Florida corporation, jointly and severally, Appellants, v. William SAUER, individually, and William Sauer, as parent and next friend of Casey L. Sauer, a minor, Appellee.
Nos. 94-1859, 94-1860.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
April 5, 1995.
Janet L. Brown and Michaela D. Scheihing of Boehm, Brown, Rigdon, Seacrest & Fischer, P.A., Orlando, for appellant-State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
Stephen A. Papy of Stephen A. Papy, P.A., Miami, for appellant — Tire Kingdom, Inc.
Richard A. Kupfer of Richard A. Kupfer, P.A., and Romano, Eriksen & Cronin, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the jury's determination that the appellant, State Farm, is liable under its health insurance policy to cover the medical expenses of the appellee's dependent daughter. There is substantial competent evidence that the innocent misrepresentations, if any, made by the appellee in filling out the application for insurance were not material, as State Farm would have issued the policy had the true facts been known. While the evidence is conflicting on the issue, it was up to the jury to resolve the conflicts in the evidence.
As to the remaining points, we find that either no error was committed or that the error, if any, was harmless.
Affirmed.
WARNER, KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.