Case Name: CECIL MacCOY AND GUY T. MacCOY, RELATORS, v. JOSEPH F. McCOY COMPANY, RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1924-03-12
Citations: 2 N.J. Misc. 207
Docket Number: 
Parties: CECIL MacCOY AND GUY T. MacCOY, RELATORS, v. JOSEPH F. McCOY COMPANY, RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 2
Pages: 207–207

Head Matter:
CECIL MacCOY AND GUY T. MacCOY, RELATORS, v. JOSEPH F. McCOY COMPANY, RESPONDENT.
Submitted December 3, 1923
Decided March 12, 1924.
Corporations — Inspection of Books, Records, &c. — Case Follows Feick v. Hill Bread Co. — Writ Allowed.
On application for mandamus.
Before Justices Trenciiaed and Campbell.
For the relators, Frank W. Hastings, Jr.
For the respondent, Warren Dixon.

Opinion:
Per Ceeiam.
This is an application for a writ of mandamus to compel respondent to accord to relators, with the assistance of counsel and accountants, an inspection and examination of the by-laws and minutes, books, papers, accounts and records of respondent.
We think the proofs fully warrant the awarding of the writ applied for.
The awarding of writs of mandamus in such cases is fully and satisfactorily expressed by the opinion of Mr. Justice Kalisch in this court in Feick v. Hill Bread Co., 91 N. J. L. 486.
A peremptory writ of mandamus may issue as prayed for, with costs.