Case Name: Thomas E. Rush, Respondent, v. Mary Klein, Individually and as Administratrix, Etc., of George Geyer, Deceased, Appellant
Court: New York City Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1901-06
Citations: 35 Misc. 854
Docket Number: 
Parties: Thomas E. Rush, Respondent, v. Mary Klein, Individually and as Administratrix, Etc., of George Geyer, Deceased, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 35
Pages: 854–854

Head Matter:
Thomas E. Rush, Respondent, v. Mary Klein, Individually and as Administratrix, Etc., of George Geyer, Deceased, Appellant.
Appeax from order of Special Term, directing compulsory reference of the issues.
Menken Brothers (Mortimer M. Menken, of counsel), for appellant.
J. Harry Hull (Chas. W. Ridgway, of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
Hascall, J.
The appellant, by the answer interposed, is in position to contest each item of the plaintiff's claim, thus bringing this case within 137 N. Y. 616, and we, therefore, decide that the order appealed from was properly made.
Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements to respondent.
Conlan and O'Dwyer, JJ., concur.
Order affirmed, with costs to respondent.