Case Name: Oswald Wilson, Appellant, v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., et al., Respondents. (And Another Action.)
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1985-12-19
Citations: 66 N.Y.2d 988
Docket Number: 
Parties: Oswald Wilson, Appellant, v Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., et al., Respondents. (And Another Action.)
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 66
Pages: 988–989

Head Matter:
Oswald Wilson, Appellant, v Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., et al., Respondents. (And Another Action.)
Decided December 19, 1985
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Kevin D. Moloney for appellant.
Thomas J. Mullaney for respondents.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (111 AD2d 807).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander and Titone.