Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Timothy BARRETT, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-10-18
Citations: 173 S.W.3d 657
Docket Number: No. ED 84964
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Timothy BARRETT, Appellant.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 173
Pages: 657–657

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Timothy BARRETT, Appellant.
No. ED 84964.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Oct. 18, 2005.
Nancy A. McKerrow, Office of State Public Defender, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Shawn Naccarato, Evan J. Buchheim, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Timothy Barrett (Barrett) appeals the trial court's judgment, which was entered after a jury found him guilty of Stealing a Controlled Substance. The trial court sentenced Barrett to six years' imprisonment. There was sufficient evidence for a jury to find, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Barrett stole morphine from his place of employment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the Record on Appeal, and we find no error of law in this case. Thus, no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).