Case Name: Curlew Coal Co. vs. J. and J. J. Grief
Court: Kentucky Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Kentucky
Decision Date: 1866-09-21
Citations: 2 Duv. 527
Docket Number: 
Parties: Curlew Coal Co. vs. J. and J. J. Grief.
Judges: 
Reporter: Kentucky Reports
Volume: 63
Pages: 527–528

Head Matter:
CASE 49 — PETITION ORDINARY
SEPTEMBER 21.
Curlew Coal Co. vs. J. and J. J. Grief.
APPEAL PROM M’CRAOKEK CIRCUIT COURT.
An allegation in a petition against the defendants as indorsers of a bill of exchange that the Curlew Goal Company indorsed the bills, and that the defendants were members of that company, is sufficiently answered by a denial that the defendants were members of that company. Otherwise, if the allegation had been that they indorsed the bill in that name.
King & Hughes for appellants.
L. D. Husbands for appellees.

Opinion:
JUDGE ROBERTSON
delivered the opinion of the court:
The style of the indorsement on which the petition in this case is founded is " The Curlew Coal Companyand the only allegation to charge the appellants is, not they indorsed the bill in that name, but only that the company indorsed it, and that they were members of that company.
The answer, simply denied the allegation that the appellants were members of the said company; and the circuit court erred in sustaining a demurrer to that answer. Had the averment imported that the appellants indorsed the bill in the name and style of the company, as indorsed thereon, the mere denial that they were members of that company, not being fully responsive, would not have made a pertinent and decisive issue; because, admitting, as a demurrer would, that they were not members, still the untraversed allegation that they personally indorsed the bill, in the name of the company might, nevertheless, be true, and should be taken as virtually admitted, as hitherto adjudged by this court in 6th Dana, 128.
But according to the allegations of this petition, the gravamen is the charge that the appellants were members of the company which indorsed the bill; and unless, therefore, they were members, they are not apparently liable as indorsers. Consequently, the denial of the imputed membership was fully responsive, and concluded a material and decisive issue.
The answer was, therefore, good and sufficient.
Wherefore, the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded, with leave to amend the petition.