Case Name: H. W. Butler et al. v. The City of Findlay et al.
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1926
Citations: 4 Ohio Law Abs. 225
Docket Number: No. 19219
Parties: H. W. Butler et al. v. The City of Findlay et al.
Judges: Marshall, CJ., Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen and Kinkade, JJ., concur.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 4
Pages: 225–225

Head Matter:
No. 19219
H. W. Butler et al. v. The City of Findlay et al.

Opinion:
ROBINSON, J.
The provision of Section 6951-1 General Code, "the municipality shall pay to the county treasurer its estimated portion of the cost and expense of such an improvement to be borne by the municipality as a whole as fixed in the agreement between the council and the county commissioners," has no application to the prosecution of an improvement under Sections 6950 and 6951, General. Code.
Judgment affirmed.
Marshall, CJ., Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen and Kinkade, JJ., concur.