Case Name: Richard Donald CHAMBERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1995-02-21
Citations: 47 F.3d 1015
Docket Number: Nos. 93-55780, 93-56031
Parties: Richard Donald CHAMBERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before: Stephen REINHARDT and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and KAUFMAN, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 47
Pages: 1015–1015

Head Matter:
Richard Donald CHAMBERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
Nos. 93-55780, 93-56031.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Feb. 21, 1995.
Before: Stephen REINHARDT and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and KAUFMAN, District Judge.
The Honorable Frank A. Kaufman, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Maryland, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
ORDER
The United States' motion to vacate judgment, withdraw opinion, and summarily affirm the district court's judgments is granted in part and denied in part. The government's request to vacate judgment is granted; the remaining requests are denied.
The opinion in this case is vacated (22 F.3d 939 (9th Cir.1994)). The ease is remanded to the district court for reconsideration in light of United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc., — U.S.-, 115 S.Ct. 464, 130 L.Ed.2d 372 (1994). The district court shall determine whether review of the adequacy of the indictment is open to Chambers, and if so, whether the indictment in this matter was defective regarding allegations of scienter.