Case Name: James E. DARDEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2010-08-31
Citations: 318 S.W.3d 327
Docket Number: No. WD 71220
Parties: James E. DARDEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Division Three: VICTOR C. HOWARD, Presiding Judge, THOMAS H. NEWTON, Judge and GARY D. WITT, Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 318
Pages: 327–327

Head Matter:
James E. DARDEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 71220.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Aug. 31, 2010.
Nancy A. McKerrow, for Appellant.
Richard A. Starnes, for Respondent.
Before Division Three: VICTOR C. HOWARD, Presiding Judge, THOMAS H. NEWTON, Judge and GARY D. WITT, Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
James Darden appeals the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion following an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, Darden claims that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because his trial attorney provided ineffective assistance of counsel. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).