Case Name: Marie Antoinette LINDSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HUBBARD & DRAKE GENERAL MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, INC., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-05-22
Citations: 225 F. App'x 839
Docket Number: No. 06-13624
Parties: Marie Antoinette LINDSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HUBBARD & DRAKE GENERAL MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 225
Pages: 839–840

Head Matter:
Marie Antoinette LINDSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HUBBARD & DRAKE GENERAL MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 06-13624.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
May 22, 2007.
Adam Patterson Plant, Andrew C. Allen, W. Tucker Brown, Whatley Drake & Kal-las, LLC, Birmingham, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Clint L. Maze, John A. Wilmer, Wilmer & Lee, P.A., Huntsville, AL, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, HULL, Circuit Judge, and FORRESTER, District Judge.
Honorable J. Owen Forrester, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Georgia, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
After review and oral argument, we find no reversible error in the district court's order and contemporaneous memorandum opinion, filed on June 1, 2006, which granted Defendant-Appellee's motion for sum mary judgment on Plaintiff-Appellant's claims and dismissed Plaintiff-Appellant's claims with prejudice. Accordingly, we affirm.
AFFIRMED.