Case Name: Cornell D.M. Judge CORNISH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BALTIMORE CITY; City Council; Mayor and President of the City Council, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-10-22
Citations: 621 F. App'x 185
Docket Number: No. 15-1709
Parties: Cornell D.M. Judge CORNISH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BALTIMORE CITY; City Council; Mayor and President of the City Council, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 621
Pages: 185–185

Head Matter:
Cornell D.M. Judge CORNISH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BALTIMORE CITY; City Council; Mayor and President of the City Council, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15-1709.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 20, 2015.
Decided: Oct. 22, 2015.
Cornell D.M. Judge Cornish, Appellant Pro Se. Frederic Nelson Smalkin, Jr., Assistant Solicitor, Baltimore City Law Department, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appel-lees.
Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Cornell D.M. Judge Cornish appeals the district court's orders dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cornish v. Balt. City, No. 1:14-cv-03117-GLR (D.Md. May 15, 2015, June 26, 2015). We grant Cornish's motion for leave to file a reply brief exceeding this Court's length limitations and deny his motion to add copyrighted work to the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.