Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Malik Greenridge, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2017-02-15
Citations: 147 A.D.3d 974
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Malik Greenridge, Appellant.
Judges: Eng, P.J., Austin, Roman, Hinds-Radix and Duffy, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 147
Pages: 974–974

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Malik Greenridge, Appellant.
[46 NYS3d 806]

Opinion:
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Sciarrino, J.), imposed October 28, 2015, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257 [2011]; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133 [2014]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).
Eng, P.J., Austin, Roman, Hinds-Radix and Duffy, JJ., concur.