Case Name: Monica Rubi Sanchez VAZQUEZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-01-18
Citations: 218 F. App'x 677
Docket Number: No. 06-71527
Parties: Monica Rubi Sanchez VAZQUEZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 218
Pages: 677–677

Head Matter:
Monica Rubi Sanchez VAZQUEZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 06-71527.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 16, 2007.
Filed Jan. 18, 2007.
Monica Rubi Sanchez Vazquez, Baldw-ing Park, CA, pro se.
CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, OIL, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: SILVERMAN, PAEZ and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Respondent's motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). The Board of Immigration Appeals did not err in summarily dismissing petitioner's appeal. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(d)(2)(i)(A). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.