Case Name: Catherine Caccamo, Respondent, v. Garlock, Inc., et al., Defendants, and Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1995-04-25
Citations: 214 A.D.2d 483
Docket Number: 
Parties: Catherine Caccamo, Respondent, v Garlock, Inc., et al., Defendants, and Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 214
Pages: 483–483

Head Matter:
Catherine Caccamo, Respondent, v Garlock, Inc., et al., Defendants, and Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, Appellant.
[625 NYS2d 905]

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.), entered on or about January 12, 1995, which denied defendant-appellant's motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
For the reasons stated in Reid v Georgia-Pacific Corp. (212 AD2d 462) and Salerno v Garlock Inc. (212 AD2d 463), defendant's motion for summary judgment was properly denied. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Kupferman and Tom, JJ.