Case Name: Mary LINKER-FLORES and Anastacio Flores v. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT of HUMAN SERVICES
Court: Arkansas Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Arkansas
Decision Date: 2004-03-04
Citations: 356 Ark. 369
Docket Number: CA 03-1099
Parties: Mary LINKER-FLORES and Anastacio Flores v. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT of HUMAN SERVICES
Judges: 
Reporter: Arkansas Reports
Volume: 356
Pages: 369–369

Head Matter:
Mary LINKER-FLORES and Anastacio Flores v. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT of HUMAN SERVICES
CA 03-1099
149 S.W.3d 884
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Opinion delivered March 4, 2004
Anne Orsi Smith, for appellant.
No response.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Appellant Mary Linker-Flores's counsel, Anne Orsi Smith, moves this court to be relieved as counsel in the appeal of Appellant's termination of parental rights. Smith bases her motion on the assertions that she can find no meritorious grounds for appeal and that she would incur substantial costs and expend great time, without the expectation of a flail recovery, in the pursuit of an appeal.
In 1989, the Arkansas General Assembly adopted the view that counsel shall be provided for indigent parents in termination cases "at all stages of the proceedings." 1989 Ark. Acts 273, § 15, now codified at Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-316(h)(1) (Supp. 2003); see also Brown v. Arkansas Dep't of Human Servs., 330 Ark. 497, 954 S.W.2d 270 (1997). Because Appellant is entitled to representation on appeal, we deny Smith's motion to be relieved. Further, we order the parties to this matter to brief the issue of whether counsel representing a parent in a termination proceeding should be required to file a no-merit brief, comparable to that required under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), where there appears to be no meritorious grounds for appeal. This motion will be treated as a case and an appropriate briefing schedule will be established by the clerk of this court.