Case Name: Kenneth A. SIERRA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GRANNIS, Chief Inmate Appeals; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-09-29
Citations: 450 F. App'x 680
Docket Number: No. 09-15234
Parties: Kenneth A. SIERRA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GRANNIS, Chief Inmate Appeals; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before: HAWKINS, SILVERMAN and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 450
Pages: 680–680

Head Matter:
Kenneth A. SIERRA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GRANNIS, Chief Inmate Appeals; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
No. 09-15234.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 27, 2011.
Filed Sept. 29, 2011.
Kenneth A. Sierra, Corcoran, CA, pro se.
Before: HAWKINS, SILVERMAN and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
California state prisoner Kenneth Sierra appeals pro se from the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action on the grounds that Sierra's complaint was nearly incomprehensible. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
The district court did not err in dismissing Sierra's action. We agree that the complaint lacks an arguable basis in either law or fact. See 28 U.S.C. § § 1915(e)(2)(B), 1915A.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.