Case Name: GRAHAM ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ST. PAUL MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Appellee, Riverview Architectural Products, Inc., Gary A. Fleming, Hope Fleming, Adam J. Waite, Nancy L. Waite, David A. Walter, Jane C. Walter, Keith A. Walter and Shelley L. Walter, Third-Party-Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-11-08
Citations: 112 F. App'x 123
Docket Number: No. 04-1002
Parties: GRAHAM ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ST. PAUL MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Appellee, Riverview Architectural Products, Inc., Gary A. Fleming, Hope Fleming, Adam J. Waite, Nancy L. Waite, David A. Walter, Jane C. Walter, Keith A. Walter and Shelley L. Walter, Third-Party-Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: PRESENT: CARDAMONE, McLAUGHLIN and CABRANES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 112
Pages: 123–123

Head Matter:
GRAHAM ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ST. PAUL MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Appellee, Riverview Architectural Products, Inc., Gary A. Fleming, Hope Fleming, Adam J. Waite, Nancy L. Waite, David A. Walter, Jane C. Walter, Keith A. Walter and Shelley L. Walter, Third-Party-Defendants-Appellees.
No. 04-1002.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Nov. 8, 2004.
Mark A. Rosen, McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP, New York, NY, for Appellant.
James M. Hirschhorn (William J. Tinsley), Sills Cummis Epstein & Gross P.C., New York, NY, for Appellee, of counsel.
PRESENT: CARDAMONE, McLAUGHLIN and CABRANES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
SUMMARY ORDER
We have considered all of appellant's arguments and, substantially for the reasons explained by the District Court in its careful and thoughtful Memorandum and Order, entered January 27, 2004, Graham Arch. Prods. Corp. v. St. Paul Mercury Ins. Co., 303 F.Supp.2d 274 (E.D.N.Y.2004), we find each to be without merit
Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is hereby AFFIRMED.