Case Name: In the Matter of W. W., aka J. W., aka J. D., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. W. W., aka J. W., aka J. D., Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2009-04-01
Citations: 227 Or. App. 279
Docket Number: 070970206; A137082
Parties: In the Matter of W. W., aka J. W., aka J. D., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. W. W., aka J. W., aka J. D., Appellant.
Judges: Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Schuman, Judge, and Ortega, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 227
Pages: 279–280

Head Matter:
Submitted February 6,
reversed April 1, 2009
In the Matter of W. W., aka J. W., aka J. D., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. W. W., aka J. W., aka J. D., Appellant.
Multnomah County Circuit Court
070970206; A137082
205 P3d 62
Daniel J. Casey filed the brief for appellant.
John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Rolf C. Moan, Acting Solicitor General, and Denis M. Vannier, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Schuman, Judge, and Ortega, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
In this civil commitment case, the trial court found that appellant suffers from a mental disorder and, because of that disorder, is unable to provide for his basic needs. On appeal, appellant contends that the record does not contain sufficient evidence to support the order of involuntary commitment. The state concedes the insufficiency of the evidence. On de novo review, we agree that the evidence is insufficient.
Reversed.