Case Name: In the Matter of Paul Borst, A Child Alleged to be Neglected, Appellant-Respondent. Lorraine Borst, Respondent-Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1976-10-19
Citations: 40 N.Y.2d 894
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Paul Borst, A Child Alleged to be Neglected, Appellant-Respondent. Lorraine Borst, Respondent-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 40
Pages: 894–895

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Paul Borst, A Child Alleged to be Neglected, Appellant-Respondent. Lorraine Borst, Respondent-Appellant.
Decided October 19, 1976

Opinion:
On the court's own motion, appeals by appellant infant and appellant mother transferred to the Appellate Division, Third Department, without costs. A direct appeal does not lie where questions other than the constitutional validity of a statutory provision are involved (NY Const, art VI, § 5, subd b; CPLR 5601, subd [b], par 2; Matter of Bartsch v State of New York, 33 NY2d 938).