Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Curtis LOMAX, Appellant; Curtis LOMAX, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1996-09-03
Citations: 928 S.W.2d 16
Docket Number: Nos. 66361, 69144
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Curtis LOMAX, Appellant. Curtis LOMAX, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before AHRENS, C.J., and CRANDALL and GRIMM, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 928
Pages: 16–16

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Curtis LOMAX, Appellant. Curtis LOMAX, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 66361, 69144.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Sept. 3, 1996.
Raymond J. Capelovitch, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Kurt U. Schaefer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before AHRENS, C.J., and CRANDALL and GRIMM, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals the trial court's judgment entered on his conviction of delivery of a controlled substance. § 195.211 RSMo 1994. Defendant also appeals the motion court's denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post conviction relief. Both appeals have been consolidated for review pursuant to Rule 29.15(e).
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgments of the trial court and motion court are affirmed pursuant to Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b).