Case Name: In the Matter of the Application of The City of New York Relative to Acquiring Title Wherever the Same Has Not Been Heretofore Acquired for the Same Purpose in Fee to the Lands, Tenements and Hereditaments Required for the Purpose of Opening and Extending Surf Avenue from West Fifth Street to West Thirty-seventh Street, in the Borough of Brooklyn, City of New York. South Brooklyn Railway Company, Appellant; Charles W. Berry, as Comptroller of The City of New York, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1933-03
Citations: 238 A.D. 862
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Application of The City of New York Relative to Acquiring Title Wherever the Same Has Not Been Heretofore Acquired for the Same Purpose in Fee to the Lands, Tenements and Hereditaments Required for the Purpose of Opening and Extending Surf Avenue from West Fifth Street to West Thirty-seventh Street, in the Borough of Brooklyn, City of New York. South Brooklyn Railway Company, Appellant; Charles W. Berry, as Comptroller of The City of New York, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 238
Pages: 862–862

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Application of The City of New York Relative to Acquiring Title Wherever the Same Has Not Been Heretofore Acquired for the Same Purpose in Fee to the Lands, Tenements and Hereditaments Required for the Purpose of Opening and Extending Surf Avenue from West Fifth Street to West Thirty-seventh Street, in the Borough of Brooklyn, City of New York. South Brooklyn Railway Company, Appellant; Charles W. Berry, as Comptroller of The City of New York, Respondent.
Affd., 262 N. Y. 652.

Opinion:
Order denying motion to direct the comptroller to pay additional interest affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Seudder, J., dissent and vote for reversal.