Case Name: Michael Eugene OWENS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DILLARD'S, Defendant-Appellee, and William T. Dillard, II; Higbee Lancoms, LP; Jim Green, Store Manager; Paul Close, Assistant Manager; Keith White, District Manager, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-09-08
Citations: 668 F. App'x 496
Docket Number: No. 16-1441
Parties: Michael Eugene OWENS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DILLARD’S, Defendant-Appellee, and William T. Dillard, II; Higbee Lancoms, LP; Jim Green, Store Manager; Paul Close, Assistant Manager; Keith White, District Manager, Defendants.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 668
Pages: 496–497

Head Matter:
Michael Eugene OWENS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DILLARD’S, Defendant-Appellee, and William T. Dillard, II; Higbee Lancoms, LP; Jim Green, Store Manager; Paul Close, Assistant Manager; Keith White, District Manager, Defendants.
No. 16-1441
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: August 30, 2016
Decided: September 8, 2016
Michael Eugene Owens, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Ruth Dangel, OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appel-lee.
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael Eugene Owens appeals the district court's order denying Owens' motion to set aside an arbitration award. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Owens v. Dillard's, No. 3:14-cv-00433-FDW-DCK (W.D.N.C. Apr. 13, 2016). We deny Owens' motions to subpoena for interrogatories, for production of documents, for a transcript at Government expense, and for lay and expert witnesses. We grant Dillard's motion to strike Owens' press release and deny Dillard's motion for sanctions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED