Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Isaias TORRES-SALCEDO, also known as Isaias Torres, also known as Michael Alfonso Loya, also known as Isaias Torres Salcedo, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-08-29
Citations: 581 F. App'x 343
Docket Number: No. 13-20465
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Isaias TORRES-SALCEDO, also known as Isaias Torres, also known as Michael Alfonso Loya, also known as Isaias Torres Salcedo, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 581
Pages: 343–344

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Isaias TORRES-SALCEDO, also known as Isaias Torres, also known as Michael Alfonso Loya, also known as Isaias Torres Salcedo, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-20465
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 29, 2014.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Lance C. Hamm, Lance C. Hamm, Attorney, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before CLEMENT, PRADO, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Isaias Torres-Salcedo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Torres-Salcedo has not filed a response. We have reviewed coun sel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.