Case Name: Joseph JOHNSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. C.D. LARSEN, Warden; Ronald J. Angelone; W.P. Rogers, Regional Director; C. Wallace; J. Townsend; J. Berry, Sergeant; S. Harris; R. Whitehead, Captain; D. Newcomb, Sergeant; R. Jennings, Sergeant; R. Martin, Lieutenant; D. Graham; L. Ford, Correctional Officer; B. Boise, Correctional Officer; W. Harvey, Sergeant; D. Ingram; S. Hailey; G. Cook; W. Griffin, Sergeant; G. Graham, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-12-27
Citations: 22 F. App'x 308
Docket Number: No. 01-6049
Parties: Joseph JOHNSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. C.D. LARSEN, Warden; Ronald J. Angelone; W.P. Rogers, Regional Director; C. Wallace; J. Townsend; J. Berry, Sergeant; S. Harris; R. White head, Captain; D. Newcomb, Sergeant; R. Jennings, Sergeant; R. Martin, Lieutenant; D. Graham; L. Ford, Correctional Officer; B. Boise, Correctional Officer; W. Harvey, Sergeant; D. Ingram; S. Hailey; G. Cook; W. Griffin, Sergeant; G. Graham, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 22
Pages: 308–309

Head Matter:
Joseph JOHNSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. C.D. LARSEN, Warden; Ronald J. Angelone; W.P. Rogers, Regional Director; C. Wallace; J. Townsend; J. Berry, Sergeant; S. Harris; R. White head, Captain; D. Newcomb, Sergeant; R. Jennings, Sergeant; R. Martin, Lieutenant; D. Graham; L. Ford, Correctional Officer; B. Boise, Correctional Officer; W. Harvey, Sergeant; D. Ingram; S. Hailey; G. Cook; W. Griffin, Sergeant; G. Graham, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 01-6049.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 20, 2001.
Decided Dec. 27, 2001.
Joseph Johnson, Jr., Pro Se. Banci Enga Tewolde, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appel-lees.
Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Joseph Johnson, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint, denying his motion for reconsideration, and denying various preliminary motions. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as frivolous on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. Larsen, No. CA-99-582 (E.D. Va. Apr. 5, 2000; Apr. 25, 2000; July 7, 2000; Aug. 4, 2000; Nov. 29, 2000; Aug. 15, 2001). We deny Johnson's petition for writ of mandamus as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.