Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. BILLY DEAN HARRIS, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1984-10-17
Citations: 70 Or. App. 353
Docket Number: 83122732; CA A32408
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. BILLY DEAN HARRIS, Appellant.
Judges: Before Joseph, Chief Judge, and Warden and Newman, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 70
Pages: 353–354

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted September 18,
affirmed October 17, 1984
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. BILLY DEAN HARRIS, Appellant.
(83122732; CA A32408)
688 P2d 439
Kent Hickam, Albany, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.
Thomas H. Denney, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, James E. Mountain, Jr., Solicitor General, and Christine Chute, Assistant Attorney General, Salem.
Before Joseph, Chief Judge, and Warden and Newman, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
It is doubtful whether defendant's exception to the jury's instruction was sufficient to raise the question urged on appeal. Assuming that it was sufficient, the judgment is affirmed. State v. Kohlasch, 11 Or App 459, 502 P2d 1158 (1972).
Affirmed.