Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jesse G. KLUMPP, Defendant/Appellant; Jesse G. KLUMPP, Defendant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1997-05-20
Citations: 945 S.W.2d 618
Docket Number: Nos. 66200, 70445
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jesse G. KLUMPP, Defendant/Appellant. Jesse G. KLUMPP, Defendant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before RHODES RUSSELL, P.J., and SIMON and KAROHL, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 945
Pages: 618–618

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jesse G. KLUMPP, Defendant/Appellant. Jesse G. KLUMPP, Defendant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 66200, 70445.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
May 20, 1997.
Robert E. Steele, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Fernando Bermudez, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before RHODES RUSSELL, P.J., and SIMON and KAROHL, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals from his convictions and sentences for eight counts of sodomy in violation of § 566.060.3 RSMo Cum.Supp. 1993. Defendant also appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.
An extended opinion would serve no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b).