Case Name: In the MATTER OF the Care and Treatment of Jody KIRK, a/k/a Jody L. Kirk, a/k/a Jody Len Kirk
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2015-06-09
Citations: 463 S.W.3d 466
Docket Number: No. ED 101832
Parties: In the MATTER OF the Care and Treatment of Jody KIRK, a/k/a Jody L. Kirk, a/k/a Jody Len Kirk.
Judges: Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 463
Pages: 466–467

Head Matter:
In the MATTER OF the Care and Treatment of Jody KIRK, a/k/a Jody L. Kirk, a/k/a Jody Len Kirk.
No. ED 101832
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
FILED: June 9, 2015
Erika Renee Eliason, 1000 W. Nifong, Bldg 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203, Office of State Public Defender, for appellant.
Chris Roster, Attorney General, Mary Highland Moore, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.
Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Jody Kirk (Kirk) appeals from the court's Judgment and Commitment Order (judgment) based upon a jury verdict and finding Kirk to be a sexually violent predator (SVP) and ordering him committed to the custody of the director of the Department of Mental Health. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose! We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).