Case Name: Blanca Emid PETTY, Plaintiff-Appellant v. John Kent PETTY; Rosemarie Reeves; Chad Ellis; Mark Humphrey; John Milam Merck, Sr.; Scot A. Powell; Marie Appling Powell; Richard Kerzee; Vincent L. Marable, III; Jimmy Phillips, Jr.; Paige Curran Cunningham, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-07-07
Citations: 692 F. App'x 210
Docket Number: No. 16-20306 Summary Calendar
Parties: Blanca Emid PETTY, Plaintiff-Appellant v. John Kent PETTY; Rosemarie Reeves; Chad Ellis; Mark Humphrey; John Milam Merck, Sr.; Scot A. Powell; Marie Appling Powell; Richard Kerzee; Vincent L. Marable, III; Jimmy Phillips, Jr.; Paige Curran Cunningham, Defendants-Appellees
Judges: Before BENAVIDES, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 692
Pages: 210–210

Head Matter:
Blanca Emid PETTY, Plaintiff-Appellant v. John Kent PETTY; Rosemarie Reeves; Chad Ellis; Mark Humphrey; John Milam Merck, Sr.; Scot A. Powell; Marie Appling Powell; Richard Kerzee; Vincent L. Marable, III; Jimmy Phillips, Jr.; Paige Curran Cunningham, Defendants-Appellees
No. 16-20306 Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed July 7, 2017
Blanca Emid Petty, Pro Se
Before BENAVIDES, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Blanca Emid Petty has appealed the district court's order dismissing her diversity complaint without prejudice for failure to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. Petty has not shown that the district court abused its discretion. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m); Lindsey v. United States R.R. Retirement Bd., 101 F.3d 444, 445 (5th Cir. 1996). The district court's order is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R, 47.5.4.