Case Name: Robert SIPKO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ROGER, INC., Roger Distributed Solutions, Inc., Roger Professional Services, Inc., Roger Limited (Dublin), and George Sipko, Defendants-Movants, and Rastislav Sipko, Defendant.
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 2019-05-06
Citations: 206 A.3d 955
Docket Number: M-950/952/989 September Term 2018; 082090
Parties: Robert SIPKO, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
ROGER, INC., Roger Distributed Solutions, Inc., Roger Professional Services, Inc., Roger Limited (Dublin), and George Sipko, Defendants-Movants,
and
Rastislav Sipko, Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 206
Pages: 955–955

Head Matter:
Robert SIPKO, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
ROGER, INC., Roger Distributed Solutions, Inc., Roger Professional Services, Inc., Roger Limited (Dublin), and George Sipko, Defendants-Movants,
and
Rastislav Sipko, Defendant.
M-950/952/989 September Term 2018
082090
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
MAY 6, 2019
ORDER

Opinion:
It is ORDERED that the motions for an extension of time to file an answer in opposition to the motion to dismiss (M-950) and for leave to deem the previously submitted notice of petition for certification and petition for certification as a timely motion for leave to appeal (M-952) are granted; and it is further
ORDERED that the previously submitted notice of petition for certification (C-820) is thereby rendered moot, this matter proceeding instead as a motion for leave to appeal pursuant to M-952; and it is further
ORDERED that the motion for leave to appeal (M-989) is denied.