Case Name: Charles A. Pfohl, Deceased, by Richard C. Pfohl, Administrator of the Estate of Charles A. Pfohl, Deceased, et al., Appellants, v. Richard Wipperman et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1974-03-21
Citations: 34 N.Y.2d 597
Docket Number: 
Parties: Charles A. Pfohl, Deceased, by Richard C. Pfohl, Administrator of the Estate of Charles A. Pfohl, Deceased, et al., Appellants, v. Richard Wipperman et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 34
Pages: 597–598

Head Matter:
Charles A. Pfohl, Deceased, by Richard C. Pfohl, Administrator of the Estate of Charles A. Pfohl, Deceased, et al., Appellants, v. Richard Wipperman et al., Respondents.
Argued February 20, 1974;
decided March 21, 1974.
Laurin D. Rachlin and David C. Laub for appellants.
Raymond T. Miles for Richard Wipperman, respondent.
Arthur J. Maloney for Town of Cheektowaga, respondent;

Opinion:
Order affirmed, with costs to defendants-respondents, in the following memorandum: Our court has jurisdiction to entertain this appeal. We conclude, however, that there are presented only questions of fact as to the weight of the evidence and no question of law. Accordingly, the order of the Appellate Division is outside our power of review. (Armstrong v. Campbell, 30 N Y 2d 704; Cameron v. Permakoff, 28 N Y 2d 938; Indiere v. Strickroth, 28 N Y 2d 513; Musumeci v. Pillsbury Mills, 11 N Y 2d 948; Gutin v. Mascali & Sons, 11 N Y 2d 97; see Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals [rev. ed.], § 148, p. 588.)
Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Rabin and Stevens.