Case Name: Donald JENSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WESTERN CAROLINA UNIVERSITY; University of North Carolina; Robert Mcmahan, in his individual and official capacities; Mary Ann Lochner, in her individual and official capacities; James Zhang, in his individual and official capacities; Earnest Hudson, Jr., in his individual and official capacities, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-08-28
Citations: 538 F. App'x 359
Docket Number: No. 13-1110
Parties: Donald JENSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WESTERN CAROLINA UNIVERSITY; University of North Carolina; Robert Mcmahan, in his individual and official capacities; Mary Ann Lochner, in her individual and official capacities; James Zhang, in his individual and official capacities; Earnest Hudson, Jr., in his individual and official capacities, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 538
Pages: 359–360

Head Matter:
Donald JENSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WESTERN CAROLINA UNIVERSITY; University of North Carolina; Robert Mcmahan, in his individual and official capacities; Mary Ann Lochner, in her individual and official capacities; James Zhang, in his individual and official capacities; Earnest Hudson, Jr., in his individual and official capacities, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 13-1110.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 21, 2013.
Decided: Aug. 28, 2013.
S. Luke Largess, Tin, Futon, Walker & Owen, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Roy Cooper, Attorney General, Katherine A. Murphy, Assistant Attorney General, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Donald Jensen appeals a district court order granting summary judgment against him in his suit primarily alleging that he was unlawfully retaliated against for speech protected by the First Amendment and the North Carolina Whistleblower Act, see N.C.G.S. § 126-84 et seq., and that he was temporarily barred from campus in violation of his rights to due process under the United States Constitution. We have reviewed the record and we find no error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Jensen v. Western Carolina Univ., 2012 WL 6728360 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 28, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.