Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. David A. GUNTER, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-06-27
Citations: 194 S.W.3d 370
Docket Number: No. WD 65440
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. David A. GUNTER, Appellant.
Judges: Before RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Presiding Judge, HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, Judge, and ROBERT G. ULRICH, Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 194
Pages: 370–370

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. David A. GUNTER, Appellant.
No. WD 65440.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
June 27, 2006.
Irene C. Earns, Public Defender Office, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Shaun Mackelprang and Dora A. Fichter, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Presiding Judge, HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, Judge, and ROBERT G. ULRICH, Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
David Gunter appeals his conviction in a bench trial for the class D felony of driving while intoxicated and as a persistent intoxication-related offender. His sole point on appeal contends that the trial court erred in permitting the prosecutor to argue in closing that Mr. Gunter's trial testimony was untruthful. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. The parties, however, have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).