Case Name: NORA FROMOWITZ, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM FROMOWITZ, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1998-12-22
Citations: 317 N.J. Super. 63
Docket Number: 
Parties: NORA FROMOWITZ, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM FROMOWITZ, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 317
Pages: 63–63

Head Matter:
721 A.2d 40
NORA FROMOWITZ, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM FROMOWITZ, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Submitted December 2, 1998
Decided December 22, 1998.
Before Judges LANDAU, BRAITHWAITE and WECKER.
Afflitto, Raimondi & Afflitto, attorneys for appellant (Thomas R. Raimondi, on the brief).
Edward A. Berger, attorney for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals from that portion of a judgment of divorce that addresses equitable distribution and imputed income to plaintiff for alimony purposes. The judgment, however, expressly reserved determination as to the amount of alimony and counsel fees, rendering the judgment interlocutory.
"[Defendant] has no right to appeal the adverse portions of the incomplete judgment without leave of this court." Frantzen v. Howard, 132 N.J.Super. 226, 227, 333 A.2d 289 (App.Div.1975); R. 2:2-4. We therefore dismiss this appeal from an order incorrectly represented to this court by both counsel as disposing of all issues as to all parties.
Dismissed.