Case Name: RODERICK ESPOSITO, PROSECUTOR, v. BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONERS AND THE MAYOR, ETC., OF HOBOKEN, RESPONDENTS
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1930-03-28
Citations: 8 N.J. Misc. 255
Docket Number: 
Parties: RODERICK ESPOSITO, PROSECUTOR, v. BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONERS AND THE MAYOR, ETC., OF HOBOKEN, RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 8
Pages: 255–255

Head Matter:
RODERICK ESPOSITO, PROSECUTOR, v. BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONERS AND THE MAYOR, ETC., OF HOBOKEN, RESPONDENTS.
Argued March 27, 1930
Decided March 28, 1930.
Before Justices Teenchabd, Lloyd and Case.
Eor the prosecutor, Nicholas 8. Schloeder.
Eor the respondents, Horace L. Alien.

Opinion:
Pee Cueiam.
Our examination of the record discloses to our satisfaction that the order of the public utility board revoking the local consent of the prosecutor to operate an auto bus in Hoboken is amply supported by evidence and is legally unobjectionable. Accordingly, the rule to show cause why a writ of certiorari should not issue to review such order is discharged, with costs.