Case Name: Sheryl DYKSTRA-GULICK, Petitioner, v. Douglas GULICK, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-06-24
Citations: 620 So. 2d 1256
Docket Number: No. 80486
Parties: Sheryl DYKSTRA-GULICK, Petitioner, v. Douglas GULICK, Respondent.
Judges: BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 620
Pages: 1256–1256

Head Matter:
Sheryl DYKSTRA-GULICK, Petitioner, v. Douglas GULICK, Respondent.
No. 80486.
Supreme Court of Florida.
June 24, 1993.
Dock A. Blanchard of Blanchard, Merriam, Adel & Kirkland, P.A., Ocala, for petitioner.
Anthony J. Salzman and Ernest J. Myers of Moody, Salzman & Robertson, Gaines-ville, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have for review Dykstra-Gulick v. Gulick, 604 So.2d 1282 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992), which certified a question of great public importance recently answered by our opinion in Waite v. Waite, 618 So.2d 1360 (Fla.1993). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. The decision below is quashed, and this cause is remanded for reconsideration in light of Waite.
It is so ordered.
BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.