Case Name: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Gregorio TORO, III, Petitioner
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2014-03-12
Citations: 87 A.3d 316
Docket Number: 
Parties: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Gregorio TORO, III, Petitioner.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 87
Pages: 316–316

Head Matter:
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Gregorio TORO, III, Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
March 12, 2014.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 12th day of March, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue is: Whether Superior Court erred because it affirmed the PCRA court but for different reasons; namely, that the [petition was untimely and this determination was made sua sponte by the Superior Court but is erroneous because the issues being adjudicated were raised in a timely PCRA but subsequent PCRA's [sic] were filed for procedural defects of the Common Pleas Court or abandonment by prior PCRA counsel?