Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mitchell GATEWOOD, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-03-09
Citations: 316 F. App'x 226
Docket Number: No. 08-8211
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Mitchell GATEWOOD, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 316
Pages: 226–226

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Mitchell GATEWOOD, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 08-8211.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 26, 2009.
Decided: March 9, 2009.
Mitchell Gatewood, Appellant Pro Se. Adam Christopher Moms, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Mitchell Gatewood seeks to appeal the district court's minute entry dismissing one but not all of the claims he presented in his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2008) motion. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Gatewood seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We further deny Gatewood's motions to appoint/assign counsel, for transcript at government expense, and for a certificate of appealability. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.