Case Name: HALL versus COX
Court: North Carolina Superior Court
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 1790-04
Citations: 1 Mart. 24
Docket Number: 
Parties: HALL versus COX.
Judges: All the Judges present.
Reporter: North Carolina Reports
Volume: 1
Pages: 24–25

Head Matter:
Hillsborough,
April Term, 1790.
HALL versus COX.

Opinion:
COX was bound in a recognizance to appear at October Term, 1789, but did not appear, his recognizance was defaulted. Cox had been convicted at Fayetteville Superior Court of Law, of horse stealing, and suffered the punishment. He appeared this term, and an affidavit was offered, sworn to by himself, to induce the court to remit his recognizance, and was permitted to be read.
All the Judges present.