Case Name: MUTUAL BENEFIT INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner v. Christos POLITOPOULOS, Dionysios Mihalopoulos and Marina Denovitz, Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2014-06-20
Citations: 626 Pa. 113
Docket Number: No. 943 MAL 2013
Parties: MUTUAL BENEFIT INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner v. Christos POLITOPOULOS, Dionysios Mihalopoulos and Marina Denovitz, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 626
Pages: 113–114

Head Matter:
95 A.3d 268
MUTUAL BENEFIT INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner v. Christos POLITOPOULOS, Dionysios Mihalopoulos and Marina Denovitz, Respondents.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
June 20, 2014.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 20th day of June, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the following issue set forth below: Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
Whether the Superior Court properly ruled that Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Association Insurance Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Insurance Co., 426 Pa. 453, 233 A.2d 548 (1967) ("PMA") did not control in the instant case because of the divergence in wording between the "severability clause" in PMA and the language in the Umbrella Policy here, finding that the plain unambiguous language in the case at hand provides coverage for the liability in question.