Case Name: In the ESTATE OF Mary L. BODER, Plaintiff, Mercantile Bank of St. Joseph, N.A., Respondent, v. ALBRECHT ART MUSEUM, et al., Respondents, and Ralph O. Stauber, Sr., et al., Appellants, and Unknown, Unborn and Minor Descendants of Ralph Stauber, St. Joseph Historical Society, et al. and Attorney General of Missouri, Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1994-04-05
Citations: 879 S.W.2d 545
Docket Number: No. WD 48083
Parties: In the ESTATE OF Mary L. BODER, Plaintiff, Mercantile Bank of St. Joseph, N.A., Respondent, v. ALBRECHT ART MUSEUM, et al., Respondents, and Ralph O. Stauber, Sr., et al., Appellants, and Unknown, Unborn and Minor Descendants of Ralph Stauber, St. Joseph Historical Society, et al. and Attorney General of Missouri, Respondents.
Judges: Before SMART, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and FENNER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 879
Pages: 545–546

Head Matter:
In the ESTATE OF Mary L. BODER, Plaintiff, Mercantile Bank of St. Joseph, N.A., Respondent, v. ALBRECHT ART MUSEUM, et al., Respondents, and Ralph O. Stauber, Sr., et al., Appellants, and Unknown, Unborn and Minor Descendants of Ralph Stauber, St. Joseph Historical Society, et al. and Attorney General of Missouri, Respondents.
No. WD 48083.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
April 5, 1994.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 31, 1994.
Application to Transfer Denied Aug. 15, 1994.
Ralph 0. Stauber, Sr., appellant pro se.
Stephen J. Briggs, St. Joseph, for respondent Mercantile Bank of St. Joseph.
John Phillip Beihl, St. Joseph, for respondents Albrecht Art Museum and St. Joseph Historical Soc.
Mark Allen Brittingham, St. Louis, for respondent unknown, unborn and minor descendants of Ralph Stauber.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent Atty. Gen. of Missouri.
Before SMART, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and FENNER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appeal from order allocating attorney fees against family trust and finding guardian ad litem fee reasonable.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).