Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ricardo ARCE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-04-19
Citations: 685 F. App'x 241
Docket Number: No. 16-7704
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ricardo ARCE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 685
Pages: 241–242

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ricardo ARCE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-7704
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 5, 2017
Decided: April 19, 2017
Ricardo Arce, Appellant Pro Se.
Michael Gordon James, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ricardo Arce appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(d)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Arce, No. 5:08-cr-00111-BO-1 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 23, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED