Case Name: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. The DEUTSCH COMPANY, ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS DIVISION, Respondent; The DEUTSCH COMPANY, ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS DIVISION, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1969-04-07
Citations: 408 F.2d 684
Docket Number: Nos. 22753, 22811
Parties: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. The DEUTSCH COMPANY, ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS DIVISION, Respondent. The DEUTSCH COMPANY, ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS DIVISION, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 408
Pages: 684–685

Head Matter:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. The DEUTSCH COMPANY, ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS DIVISION, Respondent. The DEUTSCH COMPANY, ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS DIVISION, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.
Nos. 22753, 22811.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
April 7, 1969.
Melvin J. Welles, Washington, D. C. (argued), Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Paul J. Spielberg, Atty., Washington, D. C., Ralph E. Kennedy, Director, N. L. R. B„ Los Angeles, Cal., for N. L. R. B.
Leon M. Cooper (argued), of Cooper, Tepper & Plant, Mark C. Madden, Los Angeles, Cal., for Deutsch Co.
Before CHAMBERS and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges, and VON DER HEYDT, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We find the alleged violations of the Labor-Management Act so trivial that we conclude the purposes of the Act would not be served by enforcement of the Board's proposed order.
Accordingly, enforcement is denied.