Case Name: In the Matter of Mary Walker, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MARY WALKER, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2005-08-10
Citations: 201 Or. App. 206
Docket Number: 0411-72506; A126851
Parties: In the Matter of Mary Walker, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MARY WALKER, Appellant.
Judges: Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Linder and Wollheim, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 201
Pages: 206–207

Head Matter:
Submitted on record and briefs July 1,
reversed August 10, 2005
In the Matter of Mary Walker, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MARY WALKER, Appellant.
0411-72506; A126851
116 P3d 954
Thomas A. Coleman filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Katherine H. Waldo, Senior Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Linder and Wollheim, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Appellant was committed to the custody of the Mental Health Division based on the trial court's finding that, because of a mental disorder, she is unable to provide for her basic personal needs and is not receiving such care as is necessary for her health or safety. ORS 426.005(l)(d)(B). She appeals, arguing that the trial court erred in finding that the state had proved by clear and convincing evidence that she is unable to provide for her basic needs. The state concedes that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence to establish the required elements for an order of involuntary commitment. After reviewing the record de novo, State v. O'Neill, 274 Or 59, 61, 545 P2d 97 (1976), we accept the state's concession.
Reversed.