Case Name: The STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Roger ARSHAM, Respondent
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2003-12-24
Citations: 861 So. 2d 113
Docket Number: No. 3D03-2598
Parties: The STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Roger ARSHAM, Respondent.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GERSTEN and GODERICH, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 861
Pages: 113–114

Head Matter:
The STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Roger ARSHAM, Respondent.
No. 3D03-2598.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 24, 2003.
Charles J. Crist, Jr. Attorney General and Roberta G. Mandel, Assistant Attorney General, for petitioner.
Ellis Rubin and Robert I. Barrar, Miami, for respondent.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GERSTEN and GODERICH, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Because the showing made by the criminal defendant below was totally insufficient to justify a bodily intrusion into the privacy of the alleged victim, the order requiring her to provide a DNA sample is quashed. See State v. Famiglietti 817 So.2d 901 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002), review dis missed, 838 So.2d 528 (Fla.2003); State v. Kuntsman, 643 So.2d 1172 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); State v. Brewster, 601 So.2d 1289 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992); Bartlett v. Hamwi, 626 So.2d 1040 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993).
Certiorari granted.