Case Name: Jonathan David MOSS, Appellant, v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee
Court: Arkansas Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Arkansas
Decision Date: 2009-06-04
Citations: 321 S.W.3d 254
Docket Number: No. CR 09-514
Parties: Jonathan David MOSS, Appellant, v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 321
Pages: 254–255

Head Matter:
2009 Ark. 344
Jonathan David MOSS, Appellant, v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee.
No. CR 09-514.
Supreme Court of Arkansas.
June 4, 2009.
Lynn F. Plemmons, Conway, for appellant.
No response.

Opinion:
MOTION FOR RULE ON CLERK
PER CURIAM.
| Appellant Jonathan David Moss, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney, Lynn F. Plemmons, states in the motion that our clerk refused to accept his untimely tender of the record.
This court clarified its treatment of motions for rule on clerk and motions for belated appeals in McDonald v. State, 356 Ark. 106, 146 S.W.3d 883 (2004). There we said that there are only two possible reasons for an appeal not being timely perfected: either the party or attorney filing the appeal is at fault, or, there is "good reason." Id. at 116, 146 S.W.3d at 891. We explained:
Where an appeal is not timely perfected, either the party or attorney filing the appeal is at fault, or there is good reason that the appeal was not timely perfected. The party or attorney filing the appeal is therefore faced with two options. First, where the party or attorney filing the appeal is at fault, fault should be admitted by affidavit filed with the motion or in the motion itself. | ¡.There is no advantage in declining to admit fault where fault exists. Second, where the party or attorney believes that there is good reason the appeal was not perfected, the case for good reason can be made in the motion, and this court will decide whether good reason is present.
Id. (footnote omitted). While this court no longer requires an affidavit admitting fault before we will consider the motion, an attorney should candidly admit fault where he has erred and is responsible for the failure to perfect the appeal. See id.
In accordance with McDonald v. State, supra, Mr. Plemmons has candidly admitted fault. The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.
Motion granted.