Case Name: Josephine H. Murray et al., appellants, v. Rachel A. Lynch et al., respondents
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1903-03-04
Citations: 65 N.J. Eq. 399
Docket Number: 
Parties: Josephine H. Murray et al., appellants, v. Rachel A. Lynch et al., respondents.
Judges: For affirmance — Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Yan Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Fort, Garrets on, Hendrickson, Pitney, Bogert, Yredenburgi-i, Yoorhees, Yroom — 12.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 65
Pages: 399–400

Head Matter:
Josephine H. Murray et al., appellants, v. Rachel A. Lynch et al., respondents.
[Filed March 4th, 1903.]
On-appeal from a decree of the ordinary, whose opinion is reported in 19 Dick. Ch. Rep. 290.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of the ordinary in the court below.
For affirmance — Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Yan Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Fort, Garrets on, Hendrickson, Pitney, Bogert, Yredenburgi-i, Yoorhees, Yroom — 12.
For reversal — None.