Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MICHAEL ANGELO QUINTERO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2013-01-09
Citations: 254 Or. App. 511
Docket Number: C092708CR; A146786
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MICHAEL ANGELO QUINTERO, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Haselton, Chief Judge, and Sercombe, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 254
Pages: 511–512

Head Matter:
Submitted November 27, 2012,
remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed January 9, 2013
STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MICHAEL ANGELO QUINTERO, Defendant-Appellant.
Washington County Circuit Court
C092708CR; A146786
295 P3d 684
Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, and Jonah Morningstar, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.
John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General, and Karla H. Ferrall, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Haselton, Chief Judge, and Sercombe, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant was convicted of second-degree theft, ORS 164.045, and sentenced to probation. In addition, the trial court imposed restitution in the amount of $2,105. On appeal, defendant asserts that the "trial court erred in imposing restitution in the absence of any evidence that [his] criminal conduct caused the victim's economic loss." The state concedes that, under the circumstances presented here, the trial court erred in imposing restitution. We agree and accept that concession. See State v. Dillon, 292 Or 172, 181, 637 P2d 602 (1981) (for imposition of restitution to be proper, a defendant's criminal activity must be the cause of pecuniary damage). Accordingly, the case must be remanded for resentencing.
Remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.