Case Name: Sandra RHODES, et al., Appellants, v. WESTOAK REALTY, et al., Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1997-11-18
Citations: 955 S.W.2d 827
Docket Number: No. 72208
Parties: Sandra RHODES, et al., Appellants, v. WESTOAK REALTY, et al., Respondents.
Judges: Before GRIMM, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 955
Pages: 827–827

Head Matter:
Sandra RHODES, et al., Appellants, v. WESTOAK REALTY, et al., Respondents.
No. 72208.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Nov. 18, 1997.
Elbert A. Walton, Jr., St. Louis, for appellants.
Robert C. Jones, Jr., Jones, Korum, Wal-trip & Jones, Clayton, for respondents.
Before GRIMM, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellants, Sandra Rhodes, Gennean Gillespie, and Otis Beekum ("plaintiffs"), appeal the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis dismissing their petition filed against respondents, Westoak Realty & Investment, Inc., and Robert C. Jones ("defendants"), for failure to state a claim.
As an initial matter, this Court must determine whether it has jurisdiction to entertain the issues raised before it. Skaggs v. Skaggs, 938 S.W.2d 302 (Mo.App. E.D.1997). In order to invoke this Court's jurisdiction, the parties must appeal a written decree or order which has been signed by the trial judge and denominated a "judgment." Rule 74.01(a); City of St. Louis v. Hughes, 950 S.W.2d 850, 853 (Mo.banc 1997). Such designation may appear at the top of the document, in the body of the writing, or in the form of a docket entry. Hughes, 950 S.W.2d at 853, The record before us laeks any indication the order entered by the trial court was designated a "judgment" as required for appeals purposes. See id. Accordingly, this Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.
Based on the foregoing, the appeal is dismissed.