Case Name: GLADYS HUNTER WILSON v. A. K. ANDERSON and ZOE ANDERSON STRAWN, Individually and as Administrators of the Estate of HARRY P. HUNTER; HENRY LEE ANDERSON, WILLIAM T. ANDERSON, JR., RUTH S. A. GREENWALD, and JANE BROOKE ANDERSON
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 1950-10-18
Citations: 232 N.C. 521
Docket Number: 
Parties: GLADYS HUNTER WILSON v. A. K. ANDERSON and ZOE ANDERSON STRAWN, Individually and as Administrators of the Estate of HARRY P. HUNTER; HENRY LEE ANDERSON, WILLIAM T. ANDERSON, JR., RUTH S. A. GREENWALD, and JANE BROOKE ANDERSON.
Judges: 
Reporter: North Carolina Reports
Volume: 232
Pages: 521–521

Head Matter:
GLADYS HUNTER WILSON v. A. K. ANDERSON and ZOE ANDERSON STRAWN, Individually and as Administrators of the Estate of HARRY P. HUNTER; HENRY LEE ANDERSON, WILLIAM T. ANDERSON, JR., RUTH S. A. GREENWALD, and JANE BROOKE ANDERSON.
(Filed 18 October, 1950.)
Descent and Distribution § 6—
The right of an adopted child to inherit vests as of the death of her adoptive parent, and therefore where the parent dies prior to the effective date of the Act of 1947 creating a new rule of descent and of distribution, the Act is not applicable. G.S. 29-1 (14), G.S. 28-149 (10).
PetitioN by plaintiff to rebear this case, reported ante, 212, 59 S.E. 2d 836, where the facts as shown in the record on appeal are fully stated. Since the filing of the petition to rehear the parties, through their respective attorneys, have stipulated in writing that Malcolm Hunter, the adoptive parent of plaintiff, died 23 March, 19’43.
John PL. Small for plaintiff, appellant.
Francis H. Fairley for defendants, appellees.

Opinion:
Winborne, J.
When the points raised in the petition as grounds upon which plaintiff bases her petition for a rehearing are considered in the light of the facts appearing in the record on appeal and of the further fact covered by the stipulation of the parties as above stated, it appears that in any event the provisions of the Acts of 1947 creating the new rule of descent, G.S. 29-1 (14), and of distribution, G.S. 28-149 (10), relative to rights of an adopted child axe not available to plaintiff. Whatever rights of succession she acquired by her adoption became vested upon the death of her adoptive parent. And, at that time the statute pertaining to adoption of minors, P.L. 1941, Chapter 281, giving to an adopted child the right to succession through the adoptive parent, applied only to adoption made after 15 March, 1941. See Sections 4 and 8, Chapter 281, P.L. 1941. See also Phillips v. Phillips, 227 N.C. 438, 42 S.E. 2d 604.
Hence the petition to rehear is
Dismissed.