Case Name: JOHN HARRINGTON ET AL. v. TACO GREIDANUS
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1931-12-08
Citations: 9 N.J. Misc. 1340
Docket Number: 
Parties: JOHN HARRINGTON ET AL. v. TACO GREIDANUS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 9
Pages: 1340–1340

Head Matter:
JOHN HARRINGTON ET AL. v. TACO GREIDANUS.
Decided December 8, 1931.
Before Gummere, Chiee Justice, and Justices Parker and Case.
Eor the appellant, William Tyaclce and Edward L. Davis..
For the respondents, Richard J. Fitz Maurice and Anard' W. Littmann.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Rule 141 of this court provides that on all appeals taken the statement of the case submitted to the court shall include,, among other matters, the record of the case. It hardly seems necessary to state that a judgment which is sought to be reviewed must appear as a part of that record. An examination of the statement of the case submitted to the court on this appeal fails to disclose that any judgment was ever-entered in the Circuit Court. Unless the record of the alleged judgment is included in the statement of the case submitted upon the appeal, the court cannot either affirm or reverse it,, for there is nothing before the court to review. Thompson v. Browne, 39 N. J. L. 2; Mershon v. Castru, 57 Id. 484; Stagway v. Riker, 88 Atl. Rep. 1067.
For the reason indicated, the appeal will be dismissed