Case Name: ALPHONSO MOSES EL, APPELLANT, v. JOHN J. TOOHEY, Jr., COMMISSIONER, ETC., RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1941-01-03
Citations: 125 N.J.L. 510
Docket Number: 
Parties: ALPHONSO MOSES EL, APPELLANT, v. JOHN J. TOOHEY, Jr., COMMISSIONER, ETC., RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 125
Pages: 510–510

Head Matter:
ALPHONSO MOSES EL, APPELLANT, v. JOHN J. TOOHEY, Jr., COMMISSIONER, ETC., RESPONDENT.
Argued October 18, 1940
Decided January 3, 1941.
For the appellant, Harry Krieger.
For the respondent, William J. Egan, assistant attorney-general (Stephen J. Lorenz, of counsel).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Case in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Bodine, Perskie, Porter, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.