Case Name: Billy Ray FOWLER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2014-06-30
Citations: 435 S.W.3d 164
Docket Number: No. ED 99912
Parties: Billy Ray FOWLER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before LISA S. VAN AMBURG, P.J., PATRICIA L. COHEN, J., and PHILIP M. HESS, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 435
Pages: 164–165

Head Matter:
Billy Ray FOWLER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 99912.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
June 30, 2014.
Gwenda Robinson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Gabriel Harris, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before LISA S. VAN AMBURG, P.J., PATRICIA L. COHEN, J., and PHILIP M. HESS, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Billy R. Fowler appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file and the record on appeal. The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for them information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).