Case Name: Daniel M. BEAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2011-04-15
Citations: 60 So. 3d 1096
Docket Number: No. 5D11-899
Parties: Daniel M. BEAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: MONACO, C.J., GRIFFIN and COHEN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 60
Pages: 1096–1096

Head Matter:
Daniel M. BEAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D11-899.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
April 15, 2011.
Rehearing Denied May 18, 2011.
Daniel M. Beam, Jasper, pro se.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Daniel Beam appeals the dismissal of his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. While the trial court erroneously believed it did not have jurisdiction to consider Beam's motion, see Gawronski v. State, 801 So.2d 211 (Fla. 2nd DCA 2001), we nonetheless affirm, concluding Beam's second rule 3.850 motion to be procedurally barred as an abusive, successive motion. See Owen v. Crosby, 854 So.2d 182 (Fla.2003); Christopher v. State, 489 So.2d 22 (Fla.1986).
AFFIRMED.
MONACO, C.J., GRIFFIN and COHEN, JJ., concur.