Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Rafael Collazo, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2009-10-13
Citations: 66 A.D.3d 795
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rafael Collazo, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 66
Pages: 795–795

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rafael Collazo, Appellant.
[886 NYS2d 354]

Opinion:
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Griffin, J.), rendered May 30, 2007, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant's assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).
The defendant has not, nor could he have, raised any nonfrivolous issues in his supplemental pro se brief. Fisher, J.P., Florio, Angiolillo, Eng and Roman, JJ., concur.