Case Name: Charlie Mack WILLIAMS, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David R. TANIS, Attorney, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-01-19
Citations: 2 F. App'x 255
Docket Number: No. 00-7613
Parties: Charlie Mack WILLIAMS, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David R. TANIS, Attorney, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 2
Pages: 255–255

Head Matter:
Charlie Mack WILLIAMS, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David R. TANIS, Attorney, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 00-7613.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 11, 2001.
Decided Jan. 19, 2001.
Charlie Mack Williams, Sr., pro se.
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Charlie Mack Williams, Sr., a North Carolina inmate, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp.1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Tannis, No. CA-00-783 (M.D.N.C. filed Oct. 19, 2000; entered Oct. 20, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.