Case Name: VEASEY v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1952-01-16
Citations: 247 S.W.2d 255
Docket Number: No. 25622
Parties: VEASEY v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 247
Pages: 255–255

Head Matter:
VEASEY v. STATE.
No. 25622.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Jan. 16, 1952.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 20, 1952.
Second Motion for Rehearing Denied April 2, 1952.
Wm. H. Hamblen, Edna, for appellant.
George P. Blackburn, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
MORRISON, Judge.
The offense is driving while intoxicated;: the punishment, a fine of $50.00.
We find the evidence sufficient to-support the verdict and proceed to pass upon appellant's one bill of exception. It recites that appellant objected to the use of the venire on the grounds that he had not been furnished a list thereof prior to the trial and, further, that he objected to the use of the jury selected therefrom for the same reason. We find no certificate of the judge in the bill that the facts which constitute the basis of the objection are true. The mere recitation of an objection in a bill is not sufficient. It, therefore, follows that the bill presents nothing for review. Texas Digest, Criminal Law, <^31091(10)i; Garza v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 246 S.W.2d 635.
Appellant, in his brief, makes reference to a hearing on motion for new trial. No-record of such hearing appears before us.
Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.