Case Name: George CHAPDELAINE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Warden KELLER, Warden at FCI Ray Brook, Mr. Joy, Lieutenant at FCI Ray Brook, Shynder, Corrections Officer at FCI Ray Brook, J. Howard Losiewicz, Paralegal at FCI Ray Brook, Ron Halladay, Counselor at FCI Ray Brook, David Bedore, Counselor at FCI Ray Brook, Roger Fink, Safety Officer at FCI Ray Brook, David Yaiser, Unit Manager at FCI Ray Brook, Mr. Millington, Food Service Administrator at FCI Ray Brook, Mr. Chapman, Assistant Warden at FCI Ray Brook, Mr. Cochran, Ms. Schnaars, Case Manager, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-01-31
Citations: 25 F. App'x 79
Docket Number: Docket No. 01-0026
Parties: George CHAPDELAINE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Warden KELLER, Warden at FCI Ray Brook, Mr. Joy, Lieutenant at FCI Ray Brook, Shynder, Corrections Officer at FCI Ray Brook, J. Howard Losiewicz, Paralegal at FCI Ray Brook, Ron Halladay, Counselor at FCI Ray Brook, David Bedore, Counselor at FCI Ray Brook, Roger Fink, Safety Officer at FCI Ray Brook, David Yaiser, Unit Manager at FCI Ray Brook, Mr. Millington, Food Service Administrator at FCI Ray Brook, Mr. Chapman, Assistant Warden at FCI Ray Brook, Mr. Cochran, Ms. Schnaars, Case Manager, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 25
Pages: 79–80

Head Matter:
George CHAPDELAINE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Warden KELLER, Warden at FCI Ray Brook, Mr. Joy, Lieutenant at FCI Ray Brook, Shynder, Corrections Officer at FCI Ray Brook, J. Howard Losiewicz, Paralegal at FCI Ray Brook, Ron Halladay, Counselor at FCI Ray Brook, David Bedore, Counselor at FCI Ray Brook, Roger Fink, Safety Officer at FCI Ray Brook, David Yaiser, Unit Manager at FCI Ray Brook, Mr. Millington, Food Service Administrator at FCI Ray Brook, Mr. Chapman, Assistant Warden at FCI Ray Brook, Mr. Cochran, Ms. Schnaars, Case Manager, Defendants-Appellees.
Docket No. 01-0026.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Jan. 31, 2002.
George Chapdelaine, Otisville, NY, pro se.
Elizabeth S. Riker, Ass’t U.S. Att’y, NDNY, Syracuse, NY, for Appellees.
Present NEWMAN, KEARSE, Circuit Judges, RAKOFF, District Judge.
Honorable Jed S. Rakoff, of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
SUMMARY ORDER
This cause came on to be heard on the record from the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, and was submitted by plaintiff pro se and by counsel for defendants.
ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is now hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of said District Court be and it hereby is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Munson's Order dated January 16, 2001. Although plaintiff correctly notes that nei ther the magistrate judge's report nor the district court's order discussed certain factual assertions of retaliation he made after filing his complaint, the lack of such discussion provides no basis for reversal. The undiscussed assertions were not within the scope of the complaint; and plaintiff failed to show any causal connection between plaintiffs actions and the alleged additional acts by defendants.
We have considered all of plaintiffs contentions on this appeal and have found them to be without merit. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.