Case Name: Timothy A. BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert J. LOWEN, F. Elwood Kyser, International Organization of Masters, Mates and Pilots, Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1989-11-17
Citations: 889 F.2d 58
Docket Number: No. 88-2876
Parties: Timothy A. BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert J. LOWEN, F. Elwood Kyser, International Organization of Masters, Mates and Pilots, Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and RUSSELL, WIDENER, HALL, PHILLIPS, MURNAGHAN, SPROUSE, CHAPMAN, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 889
Pages: 58–58

Head Matter:
Timothy A. BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert J. LOWEN, F. Elwood Kyser, International Organization of Masters, Mates and Pilots, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 88-2876.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Argued April 10, 1989.
Decided Nov. 17, 1989.
W. Michel Pierson, Baltimore, Md., for defendants-appellants.
Paul Alan Levy (Arthur L. Fox, II, Alan B. Morrison, Public Citizen Litigation Group, Washington, D.C., on brief), for plaintiff-appellee.
Helen Boetticher, Counsel for Litigation (Jerry G. Thorn, Acting Sol., John F. De-penbrock, Associate Sol., Barton S. Widom, Deputy Associate Sol., Sharon E. Hanley, U.S. Dept, of Labor, Washington, D.C., on brief), for amicus curiae.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and RUSSELL, WIDENER, HALL, PHILLIPS, MURNAGHAN, SPROUSE, CHAPMAN, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING IN BANC
PER CURIAM:
The en banc court adopts the majority panel opinion sustaining the district court's grant of an affirmative injunction in favor of the plaintiff-appellee against the defendants-appellants, as its opinion herein. Brown v. Lowen, 857 F.2d 216 (4th Cir.1989). Judge Hall, however, adheres to his dissent to the panel opinion and relies on it in dissent to the en banc decision herein, and Judge Phillips in joining Judge Hall's dissent has filed a separate dissenting statement of his views.
AFFIRMED.