Case Name: Lukely RILEY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1986-12-23
Citations: 810 F.2d 1006
Docket Number: No. 86-5353
Parties: Lukely RILEY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 810
Pages: 1006–1007

Head Matter:
Lukely RILEY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 86-5353
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Dec. 23, 1986.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 28, 1987.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Dept, of Legal Affairs, Susan A. Maher, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Fla., for defendant-appellant.
Peter M. Siegel, Florida Justice Institute, Inc., Randall C. Berg, Miami, Fla., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before GODBOLD, VANCE and JOHNSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The defendant seeks to appeal from the denial of his motion for summary judgment. No appeal is available. 10 Wright, Miller and Kane, Federal Practice and Procedure, § 2715 (1983); Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. Mestre, 701 F.2d 1365, 1368 (11th Cir.1983); In re Smith, 735 F.2d 459, 461 (11th Cir.1984). Nor does this case fall within any of the narrow exceptions to the rule of nonappealability such as the collateral order doctrine. See Smith, 735 F.2d at 461. The appeal is DISMISSED.