Case Name: Pacific Steel Boiler Corporation, Respondent, v. Shoreward Realty Corporation and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Appellants, Impleaded with Dimock & Fink Company, and Walworth Company, Respondents, and Others, Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1933-07
Citations: 240 A.D. 773
Docket Number: 
Parties: Pacific Steel Boiler Corporation, Respondent, v. Shoreward Realty Corporation and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Appellants, Impleaded with Dimock & Fink Company, and Walworth Company, Respondents, and Others, Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 240
Pages: 773–773

Head Matter:
Pacific Steel Boiler Corporation, Respondent, v. Shoreward Realty Corporation and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Appellants, Impleaded with Dimock & Fink Company, and Walworth Company, Respondents, and Others, Defendants.

Opinion:
Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Appellants' proposed finding No. 8, found by the trial court at folio 206, that defendant Berman-Rathe Corporation abandoned the work on August 1, 1929, is reversed, and in its place this court makes the following finding: " 8. Defendant Berman-Rathe Corporation had not abandoned the work on August 1, 1929, and had not abandoned it until after the liens had been filed." The trial court's finding in this respect must have been inadvertently made, for it is without support in the record. Conclusion of law 2, at folios 227, 228, proposed by appellants and found by the trial court, also is reversed as not being warranted by the findings. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.