Case Name: Paul HENKE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-05-01
Citations: 686 So. 2d 11
Docket Number: No. 94-03893
Parties: Paul HENKE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: DANAHY, A.C.J., and LAZZARA and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 686
Pages: 11–12

Head Matter:
Paul HENKE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 94-03893.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
May 1, 1996.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and John C. Fisher, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Anne E. Sheer, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm appellant's convictions. We strike, however, condition 9 of the orders of probation and community control because it is a special condition which was not orally pronounced at sentencing. Nank v. State, 646 So.2d 762 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). We also strike the words "at your own expense" from condition 10. Luhy v. State, 648 So.2d 308 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).
Affirmed as modified.
DANAHY, A.C.J., and LAZZARA and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.