Case Name: Luequeen Williams et al., Respondents, v. Jarnot Ardisson Co., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1959-09-25
Citations: 19 Misc. 2d 782
Docket Number: 
Parties: Luequeen Williams et al., Respondents, v. Jarnot Ardisson Co., Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 19
Pages: 782–782

Head Matter:
Luequeen Williams et al., Respondents, v. Jarnot Ardisson Co., Appellant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
September 25, 1959.
Zipser S Levitt (Sidney N. Zipser of counsel), for appellant.
W. Frederick Peniston for respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Plaintiffs failed to submit an affidavit factually sufficient to show that they have a meritorious cause of action. (Lunghino v. Marine Trust Co. of Buffalo, 163 Misc. 765; Rothschild v. Haviland, 172 App. Div. 562.)
The order should be unanimously reversed, with $10 costs and taxable disbursements to defendant and motion to open plaintiffs' default and to restore case to calendar denied with leave to renew upon proper papers.
Concur — Pette, Hart and Brown, JJ.
Order reversed, etc.