Case Name: Richard G. ACCOLLA and Marlene Accolla, his wife, Appellants, v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1982-09-21
Citations: 419 So. 2d 422
Docket Number: No. 82-125
Parties: Richard G. ACCOLLA and Marlene Accolla, his wife, Appellants, v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, DANIEL S. PEARSON, and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 419
Pages: 422–422

Head Matter:
Richard G. ACCOLLA and Marlene Accolla, his wife, Appellants, v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, Appellee.
No. 82-125.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Sept. 21, 1982.
Fuller & Feingold, Miami Beach, for appellants.
Robert A. Ginsburg, Dade County Atty. and Roy Wood, Asst. County Atty., for ap-pellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, DANIEL S. PEARSON, and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The judgment for Metropolitan Dade County entered in accordance with its motion for directed verdict is affirmed. Weissman v. K-Mart Corporation, 396 So.2d 1164 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Toomey v. Tolin, 311 So.2d 678 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); Boca Raton v. Coughlin, 299 So.2d 105 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974); City of Miami v. Albro, 120 So.2d 23 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960). See also United States v. Russell, 411 U.S. 423, 93 S.Ct. 1637, 36 L.Ed.2d 366 (1973). The County's cross-appeal from an adverse ruling on its motion for judgment on the pleadings is thereby rendered moot.
Affirmed.