Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lucio MADRIGAL-PLACIDO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-10-22
Citations: 334 F. App'x 853
Docket Number: No. 09-30029
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lucio MADRIGAL-PLACIDO, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: B. FLETCHER, LEAVY, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 334
Pages: 853–854

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lucio MADRIGAL-PLACIDO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-30029.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 13, 2009.
Filed Oct. 22, 2009.
Timothy John Racicot, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Missoula, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
John Rhodes, Esquire, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Defenders of Montana, Missoula, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: B. FLETCHER, LEAVY, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Lucio Madrigal-Placido appeals the district court's order denying in part his motion to suppress. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Madrigal-Placido contends the district court erred by declining to suppress evidence of his identity and his immigration file as the fruit of an unlawful traffic stop. As he acknowledges, this contention is foreclosed. See United States v. Del Toro Gudino, 376 F.3d 997, 1001 (9th Cir.2004); United States v. Guzman-Bruno, 27 F.3d 420, 421-22 (9th Cir.1994).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9lh Cir. R. 36-3.