Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ryan Douglas HORN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-02-16
Citations: 648 F. App'x 593
Docket Number: No. 15-2330
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ryan Douglas HORN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WOLLMAN, ARNOLD, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 648
Pages: 593–593

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ryan Douglas HORN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-2330.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Feb. 16, 2016.
Erin R. Eldridge, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Cedar Rapids, IA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Ryan Douglas Horn, Leavenworth, KS, pro se.
Brian Dean Johnson, Jacobsen & Johnson, Cedar Rapids, IA, for DefendanL-Ap-pellant.
Before WOLLMAN, ARNOLD, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Ryan Horn directly appeals after he pled guilty to a drug offense and a firearm offense and the district court imposed a within-Guidelines-range sentence. His counsel has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), arguing that Horn's sentence is substantively unreasonable.
After careful review, we conclude that the district court did not impose a substantively unreasonable sentence. See United States v. David, 682 F.3d 1074, 1076-77 (8th Cir.2012) (discussing appellate review of sentencing decisions). Furthermore, having independently reviewed the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues.
The judgment is affirmed.
. The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa.