Case Name: Duron COCKRELL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2015-10-06
Citations: 471 S.W.3d 786
Docket Number: No. ED 102297
Parties: Duron COCKRELL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Philip M. Hess, P. J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 471
Pages: 786–787

Head Matter:
Duron COCKRELL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 102297
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Filed: October 6, 2015
Andrew Zleit, Public Defenders Office, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St, Louis, Missouri 63101, for Appellant.
Karen L. Kramer, Assistant Attorney General, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102, for Respondent.
Before Philip M. Hess, P. J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Duron Cockrell (Movant) appeals the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims trial counsel was ineffective for adducing and failing to object to evidence about Mov-ant's prior bad acts. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying post-conviction relief. Ah éxtend-ed opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. Rule 84.16(b).