Case Name: Mary Ann ALAMEDA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John O. BRENNAN, Director of Central Intelligence Agency; Betty Sapp, Director of National Reconnaissance Office, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-09-02
Citations: 582 F. App'x 246
Docket Number: No. 14-1351
Parties: Mary Ann ALAMEDA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John O. BRENNAN, Director of Central Intelligence Agency; Betty Sapp, Director of National Reconnaissance Office, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 582
Pages: 246–247

Head Matter:
Mary Ann ALAMEDA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John O. BRENNAN, Director of Central Intelligence Agency; Betty Sapp, Director of National Reconnaissance Office, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 14-1351.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 28, 2014.
Decided: Sept. 2, 2014.
Mary Ann Alameda, Appellant Pro Se. Antonia Marie Konkoly, Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Mary Ann Alameda appeals the district court's order dismissing without prejudice her civil action alleging employment discrimination. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Alameda v. Brennan, No. 1:13-cv-01363-CMH-TCB (E.D.Va. Mar. 19, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.