Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gregory BLANKS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-07-30
Citations: 389 F. App'x 317
Docket Number: No. 10-6249
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gregory BLANKS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 389
Pages: 317–317

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gregory BLANKS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-6249.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 22, 2010.
Decided: July 30, 2010.
Gregory Blanks, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Gordon James, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Gregory Blanks appeals the district court's order denying his motion to compel the Government to file a Fed.R.Crim.P. 35 motion on his behalf, or for a sentence reduction based upon his allegedly substantial assistance. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. United States v. Blanks, No. 7:04-cr-00076-FL-l (E.D.N.C. Dec. 29, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.