Case Name: THE FLORIDA BAR, Petitioner, v. Peter S. PENROSE, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1982-03-11
Citations: 413 So. 2d 15
Docket Number: Nos. 60380, 61131
Parties: THE FLORIDA BAR, Petitioner, v. Peter S. PENROSE, Respondent.
Judges: ADKINS, Acting Chief Justice, and BOYD, OVERTON, McDONALD and EHRLICH, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 413
Pages: 15–15

Head Matter:
THE FLORIDA BAR, Petitioner, v. Peter S. PENROSE, Respondent.
Nos. 60380, 61131.
Supreme Court of Florida.
March 11, 1982.
Rehearing Denied May 19, 1982.
John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director and Stanley A. Spring, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, Jacquelyn Plasner Needelman, Bar Counsel and Walter G. Campbell, Jr., Chairman and Dale R. Sanders, Vice-Chairman, Seventeenth Judicial Circuit Grievance Committee “E”, Fort Lauderdale, of The Florida Bar, for complainant.
William L. Penrose of Harris, Barrett & Dew, St. Petersburg, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is a disciplinary proceeding brought by the Florida Bar. An evidentiary hearing before the referee resulted in a recommendation that the respondent be disbarred. The record supports the findings of the referee that the respondent (1) abandoned his law practice, leaving all files unattended and in the possession of a nonlawyer; (2) pled guilty to violating 21 U.S.C. § 844 (1977) (possession of marijuana); (3) failed to conclude a dissolution after accepting a fee to do so; (4) was involved in a conspiracy to purchase and distribute marijuana; and (5) was guilty of extortion. We approve and concur with these findings.
The composite conduct of this person is gross and clearly warrants disbarment. The legal profession cannot tolerate such conduct. Peter S. Penrose is hereby disbarred from the practice of law. Costs in the amount of $3,998.12 are assessed against him.
It is so ordered.
ADKINS, Acting Chief Justice, and BOYD, OVERTON, McDONALD and EHRLICH, JJ., concur.