Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David AMEZQUITA-FRANCO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-02-01
Citations: 710 F. App'x 133
Docket Number: No. 17-7079
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David AMEZQUITA-FRANCO, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 710
Pages: 133–133

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David AMEZQUITA-FRANCO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 17-7079
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: January 30, 2018
Decided: February 1, 2018
David Amezquita-Franco, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen David Schiller, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
David Amezquita-Franco seeks to appeal the district court's August 2016 order dismissing as successive and unauthorized his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Amezquita-Franco filed his notice of appeal well beyond the 60-day appeal period, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), and the appeal itself is duplicative of a prior appeal of the same order, United States v. Amezquita-Franco, 675 Fed.Appx. 335 (4th Cir. 2017) (No. 16-7111) (denying certificate of ap-pealability and dismissing appeal). Therefore, we dismiss the appeal as untimely and duplicative. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED