Case Name: Marlow HODGES, Defendant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1994-08-02
Citations: 882 S.W.2d 731
Docket Number: No. 65132
Parties: Marlow HODGES, Defendant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent.
Judges: Before REINHARD, P.J., and CRIST and CRAHAN, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 882
Pages: 731–731

Head Matter:
Marlow HODGES, Defendant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent.
No. 65132.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Aug. 2, 1994.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 30, 1994.
Robert G. Costantinou, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before REINHARD, P.J., and CRIST and CRAHAN, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for postconvietion relief after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).