Case Name: Walter ROSALES; Marie Toggery; Karen Toggery, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. KEAN ARGOVITZ RESORTS, INC., a limited liability company; Lakes Gaming, Inc., a publicly traded company; Kean-Argovitz Resort-Jamul, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; Lakes Kean-Argovitz Resorts-California, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-05-21
Citations: 35 F. App'x 562
Docket Number: No. 01-55745; D.C. No. CV-00-01910-TJW(LSP)
Parties: Walter ROSALES; Marie Toggery; Karen Toggery, Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. KEAN ARGOVITZ RESORTS, INC., a limited liability company; Lakes Gaming, Inc., a publicly traded company; Kean-Argovitz Resort-Jamul, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; Lakes Kean-Argovitz Resorts-California, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before KLEINFELD and GRABER, Circuit Judges, and BOLTON, District Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 35
Pages: 562–563

Head Matter:
Walter ROSALES; Marie Toggery; Karen Toggery, Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. KEAN ARGOVITZ RESORTS, INC., a limited liability company; Lakes Gaming, Inc., a publicly traded company; Kean-Argovitz Resort-Jamul, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; Lakes Kean-Argovitz Resorts-California, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 01-55745.
D.C. No. CV-00-01910-TJW(LSP).
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 10, 2002.
Decided May 21, 2002.
Before KLEINFELD and GRABER, Circuit Judges, and BOLTON, District Judge.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
The Honorable Susan Ritchie Bolton, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
We have carefully reviewed the Second Amended Complaint and the parties' briefs, and for the reasons stated by the district court, we agree that the plaintiffs failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. The decision of the district court is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.