Case Name: City of Hobart v. State of Indiana, ex rel. Scholler et al.; Same v. State of Indiana, ex rel. Halfman et al.; Same v. State of Indiana, ex rel. Hoffman et al.
Court: Supreme Court of Indiana
Jurisdiction: Indiana
Decision Date: 1926-12-16
Citations: 198 Ind. 729
Docket Number: Nos. 24,688, 24,689, 24,690
Parties: City of Hobart v. State of Indiana, ex rel. Scholler et al. Same v. State of Indiana, ex rel. Halfman et al. Same v. State of Indiana, ex rel. Hoffman et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Indiana Reports
Volume: 198
Pages: 729–730

Head Matter:
City of Hobart v. State of Indiana, ex rel. Scholler et al. Same v. State of Indiana, ex rel. Halfman et al. Same v. State of Indiana, ex rel. Hoffman et al.
[Nos. 24,688, 24,689, 24,690.
Filed December 16, 1926.]
Prom Lake Superior Court; Harvey J. Carter, Special Judge.
E. E. Pierson, for appellants.
Roseoe R. Pedicord, for appellees.

Opinion:
Ewbank, J.
These were actions of mandamus against the city of Hobart and its mayor and members of the common council to compel action upon petitions filed by the several groups of relators for the disannexation from the city of certain lands which relators were alleged to own. The questions involved are fully passed upon and decided in City of Hobart v. State, ex rel. (1926), ante 574, and, on the authority of the decision in that case, the judgment in each of these actions is affirmed.