Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Francisco ORTIZ-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-03-06
Citations: 678 F. App'x 253
Docket Number: No. 16-41212 Summary Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Francisco ORTIZ-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 678
Pages: 253–254

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Francisco ORTIZ-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant
No. 16-41212 Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed March 6, 2017
Ernest Gonzalez, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Texas, Plano, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Francisco Ortiz-Rodriguez, Pro Se
Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Francisco Ortiz-Rodriguez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ortiz-Rodriguez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appel late review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not he published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.