Case Name: Evelyn HERSCHER and Bernard Herscher, her husband, Appellants, v. ALBERT ENTERPRISES, INC., etc., et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1971-10-05
Citations: 252 So. 2d 863
Docket Number: No. 71-115
Parties: Evelyn HERSCHER and Bernard Herscher, her husband, Appellants, v. ALBERT ENTERPRISES, INC., etc., et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before SWANN, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 252
Pages: 863–863

Head Matter:
Evelyn HERSCHER and Bernard Herscher, her husband, Appellants, v. ALBERT ENTERPRISES, INC., etc., et al., Appellees.
No. 71-115.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct. 5, 1971.
Kates, Ress, Gomez & Rosenberg, North Miami, for appellants.
West & Goldman, Fuller, Brumer, Moss & Cohen, Miami, Joe N. Unger, Miami Beach, for appellees.
Before SWANN, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The plaintiffs appeal a final judgment entered upon a jury verdict. The points relied upon for reversal all argue claimed procedural errors in the trial of the case or in the court's handling of the post-trial motions. We hold that prejudicial error does not appear in the record. It has been frequently held that an appellate court will not reverse for a new trial upon procedural errors where it affirmatively appears that the claimed errors did not affect appellant's right to a fair trial. Hill v. Sadler, Fla.App.1966, 186 So.2d 52.
Affirmed.