Case Name: Lyndal B. DOUBERLY, Appellant, v. Mary K. O'ROURKE and International LaBoutique, Inc., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1967-08-08
Citations: 201 So. 2d 245
Docket Number: No. 66-874
Parties: Lyndal B. DOUBERLY, Appellant, v. Mary K. O’ROURKE and International LaBoutique, Inc., Appellees.
Judges: Before PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ., and DURDEN, WILLIAM L.,. Associate Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 201
Pages: 245–246

Head Matter:
Lyndal B. DOUBERLY, Appellant, v. Mary K. O’ROURKE and International LaBoutique, Inc., Appellees.
No. 66-874.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
Aug. 8, 1967.
Walton & Garrick, Podhurst & Orseck, Miami, for appellant.
Knight, Underwood, Peters, Hoeveler & Pickle, Miami, for O’Rourke; Sherouse & Corlett, Miami, for International LaBou-tique, appellees.
Before PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ., and DURDEN, WILLIAM L.,. Associate Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The plaintiff appeals a final judgment for the plaintiff in the amount of $6,000. The sole question presented is whether the trial court committed reversible error when it denied plaintiff's motion for a new trial upon the ground that the verdict was "manifestly inadequate." The appellant does, not urge any procedural error, nor does he suggest any passion or prejudice inherent in the verdict.
The judgment is affirmed upon authority of Bulmer v. Strawn, Fla.1951, 53 So.2d 315; City of Miami v. Smith, Fla.1964, 165 So.2d 748; Roberts v. Bushore, Fla.App. 1966, 183 So.2d 708.
Affirmed.