Case Name: In re The MARRIAGE OF Rebecca Kettler NEMEC and Charles Stanley Nemec. Rebecca Nemec, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Charles S. Nemec, Respondent/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-11-24
Citations: 982 S.W.2d 718
Docket Number: Nos. 73432, 73505
Parties: In re The MARRIAGE OF Rebecca Kettler NEMEC and Charles Stanley Nemec. Rebecca Nemec, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Charles S. Nemec, Respondent/Appellant.
Judges: Before PAUL J. SIMON, P.J., and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 982
Pages: 718–718

Head Matter:
In re The MARRIAGE OF Rebecca Kettler NEMEC and Charles Stanley Nemec. Rebecca Nemec, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Charles S. Nemec, Respondent/Appellant.
Nos. 73432, 73505.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Nov. 24, 1998.
Warren W. Davis, St. Louis, for appellant.
Mark H. Kruger, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before PAUL J. SIMON, P.J., and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a decree of dissolution of marriage. Husband appeals from the trial court's judgment denying his motion to amend the judgment or alternative motion for a new trial because the trial court failed to divide all non-marital property in that he was not awarded all of his separate property. Wife filed a cross-appeal which she has withdrawn.
With respect to husband's appeal, the trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).