Case Name: Michelle McILVAINE, Appellant, v. PARAMOUNT BOND & MORTGAGE CO., INC. d/b/a Paramount Mortgage Company, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2011-12-20
Citations: 360 S.W.3d 835
Docket Number: No. ED 96629
Parties: Michelle McILVAINE, Appellant, v. PARAMOUNT BOND & MORTGAGE CO., INC. d/b/a Paramount Mortgage Company, Respondent.
Judges: Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 360
Pages: 835–835

Head Matter:
Michelle McILVAINE, Appellant, v. PARAMOUNT BOND & MORTGAGE CO., INC. d/b/a Paramount Mortgage Company, Respondent.
No. ED 96629.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Dec. 20, 2011.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Feb. 7, 2012.
Application for Transfer Denied April 3, 2012.
Matthew J. Ghio, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeffrey L. Schultz, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before PATRICIA L. COHEN, P.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Michelle Mcllvaine (Plaintiff) appeals the summary judgment entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County in favor of Paramount Mortgage Company (Paramount) on Plaintiffs action for violation of the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act (MPA) and negligent misrepresentation. Plaintiff claims that the trial court erred in granting Paramount summary judgment because a genuine issue of material fact exists as to whether Paramount's failure to advise Plaintiff that there were tax liens on her property caused Plaintiff to suffer damages.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error in any of the respects alleged. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the Commission's judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).