Case Name: Willie T. BURGESS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2006-08-09
Citations: 935 So. 2d 119
Docket Number: No. 4D06-1368
Parties: Willie T. BURGESS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: FARMER, KLEIN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 935
Pages: 119–120

Head Matter:
Willie T. BURGESS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D06-1368.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Aug. 9, 2006.
Willie T. Burgess, Lake City, pro se.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melanie Dale Surber, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Willie T. Burgess, appeals the summary denial of his rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. Appellant alleged ineffective assistance of his trial counsel for failing to move to suppress his confession made to police after he was given defective Miranda warnings. In comparable cases, we have held that such a claim is legally sufficient. See Anthony v. State, 927 So.2d 1084 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); Martelus v. State, 924 So.2d 881 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); Stancle v. State, 917 So.2d 911 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). We therefore reverse and remand either for the attachment of portions of the record con clusively refuting the claim or for an evi-dentiary hearing.
Reversed and Remanded.
FARMER, KLEIN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
. Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966).