Case Name: H. E. SHUDDE, Petitioner, v. W. S. KINGSBURY, Surveyor-General, etc., Respondent; HARRY A. CHAMBERLIN, Intervener
Court: Supreme Court of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1928-12-31
Citations: 206 Cal. 792
Docket Number: S. F. No. 12708
Parties: H. E. SHUDDE, Petitioner, v. W. S. KINGSBURY, Surveyor-General, etc., Respondent; HARRY A. CHAMBERLIN, Intervener.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Reports
Volume: 206
Pages: 792–793

Head Matter:
[S. F. No. 12708.
In Bank.
December 31, 1928.]
H. E. SHUDDE, Petitioner, v. W. S. KINGSBURY, Surveyor-General, etc., Respondent; HARRY A. CHAMBERLIN, Intervener.
Paries & Williamson, David R. Paries, Frederick Williamson, Edwin Heizman and McIntyre Paries for Petitioner.
A. L. Weil, Morrison, Hohfeld, Poerster, Shuman & Clark, Roy Maggart, Geo. B. Bush, Thomas A. Joyner and Philip C. Parman, Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioner.
Harry A. Chamberlin, in pro. per., for Intervener, Harry A. Chamberlin.
U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, for Respondent.
Flint & Mackay, Prank P. Flint, Arthur R. Smiley, Alexander T. Sokolow and E. W. Miller, Amici Curiae in Support of Respondent.

Opinion:
THE COURT.
For similar reasons as assigned in Boone v. Kingsbury, Surveyor-General of the State of California, etc., S. F. No. 12707, ante, p. 148 [273 Pac. 797], this day filed, the surveyor-general of the state is commanded to issue to petitioner, H. E. Shudde, a permit to prospect for oil and gas upon the tide and submerged lands described in his petition. The writ will therefore issue.
Rehearing denied.
Shenk, J., and Curtis, J., voted for a rehearing.