Case Name: CHARLES STANLEY KIMBALL, Petitioner on review, v. BOARD OF PAROLE, Respondent on review
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1987-08-04
Citations: 303 Or. 686
Docket Number: CA A41562; SC S33873
Parties: CHARLES STANLEY KIMBALL, Petitioner on review, v. BOARD OF PAROLE, Respondent on review.
Judges: PER CURIAM
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 303
Pages: 686–688

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted June 3,
affirmed August 4,
reconsideration denied October 20,1987
CHARLES STANLEY KIMBALL, Petitioner on review, v. BOARD OF PAROLE, Respondent on review.
(CA A41562; SC S33873)
740 P2d 779
Lawrence E. Hall, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review. On the petition for review was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.
J. Scott McAlister, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent on review. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Petitioner was convicted for sodomy and rape in the first degree and was sentenced to five- and nine-year terms of imprisonment, to run concurrently.
At petitioner's prison term hearing, the Board of Parole (Board) established a history/risk score of 11, crime category 6 with a matrix range of 30 to 40 months and determined that a 36-month prison term was appropriate with a release date of March 2, 1989.
Petitioner appealed from the final order of the Board dated August 1,1986. The Court of Appeals affirmed from the bench.
Petitioner seeks review, claiming that the Board failed to consider mitigation in setting his prison term at 36 months. His claim for mitigation is that he is innocent, which is without merit.
The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.