Case Name: In re Fernando Miguel NUNEZ, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-04-11
Citations: 566 F. App'x 216
Docket Number: No. 14-1061
Parties: In re Fernando Miguel NUNEZ, Petitioner.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 566
Pages: 216–217

Head Matter:
In re Fernando Miguel NUNEZ, Petitioner.
No. 14-1061.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 1, 2014.
Decided: April 11, 2014.
Fernando Miguel Nunez, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Fernando Miguel Nunez petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court's docket reveals that the district court entered an order and judgment on March 24, 2014, denying relief on Nunez's § 2255 motion. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Nunez's case, we deny the mandamus petition, amended petition, and corrected petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.