Case Name: Andrew RUSHING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-05-24
Citations: 561 So. 2d 36
Docket Number: No. 89-840
Parties: Andrew RUSHING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: DANIEL, C.J., and DAUKSCH, J., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 561
Pages: 36–37

Head Matter:
Andrew RUSHING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 89-840.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
May 24, 1990.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Barbara L. Condon, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Fleming Lee; Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
GRIFFIN, Judge.
This is an appeal of a guidelines departure sentence in a probation violation case. The sentence imposed exceeded the one-bracket bump-up permitted in probation violation cases.
The case law in Florida has now established that a trial court cannot exceed a one-cell "bump-up" upon revocation of probation. Franklin v. State, 545 So.2d 851 (Fla.1989); State v. Tuthill, 545 So.2d 850 (Fla.1989); Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d 838 (Fla.1989); Maddox v. State, 553 So.2d 1380 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).
SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED for resentencing.
DANIEL, C.J., and DAUKSCH, J., concur.