Case Name: Julio C. MARTINEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1983-03-22
Citations: 428 So. 2d 360
Docket Number: No. 82-772
Parties: Julio C. MARTINEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 428
Pages: 360–361

Head Matter:
Julio C. MARTINEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 82-772.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 22, 1983.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Weiner, Robbins, Tunkey & Ross and Geoffrey C. Fleck, Sp. Asst. Public Defenders, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Scott Silver, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We reject the appellant's contention that the search of his person was unlawful since it is apparent from this record that there was abundant, although unarticulated, probable cause for the arrest of the appellant. See Thomas v. State, 395 So.2d 280 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). The trial court therefore properly denied appellant's motion to suppress.
We have examined the other points raised by the appellant and conclude that no error is demonstrated on this record. See Brown v. State, 423 So.2d 599 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), and cases cited therein; State v. Fischer, 387 So.2d 473 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).
Accordingly, the judgment and sentence are affirmed.