Case Name: FREDERICK F. KLAWSON AND CAROLINE KLAWSON, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. JOSEPH MAYO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1929-10-16
Citations: 7 N.J. Misc. 887
Docket Number: 
Parties: FREDERICK F. KLAWSON AND CAROLINE KLAWSON, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. JOSEPH MAYO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 7
Pages: 887–888

Head Matter:
FREDERICK F. KLAWSON AND CAROLINE KLAWSON, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. JOSEPH MAYO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Decided October 16, 1929.
Before Gun mere, Chief Justice, and Justices Parker and Bodine.
For the defendant-appellant, John A. Matthews.
For the plaintiffs-respondents, Messrs. King & O’Brien.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The plaintiffs recovered judgments against the defendant.
Our examination of the testimony in this case leads us to the conclusion that there were disputed questions of fact which were properly submitted to the jury by the trial judge, and that hence there was no error in refusing to nonsuit the plaintiffs nor in refusing to direct a verdict for the defendant. Rush v. Commercial Realty Co., 7 N. J. Mis. R. 337.
The judgment will be affirmed.