Case Name: Paul Carl, Appellant, v. Sun Printing and Publishing Association, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1916-11
Citations: 175 A.D. 948
Docket Number: 
Parties: Paul Carl, Appellant, v. Sun Printing and Publishing Association, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 175
Pages: 948–948

Head Matter:
Paul Carl, Appellant, v. Sun Printing and Publishing Association, Respondent.

Opinion:
The defendant, upon advisement, should seek to avert or to minimize the harm that may flow from an article inaccurate in any part, and hence injurious. Hence, the article published after the libel in question may be plead and proven for that purpose, as well as to reduce punitive damages, if the plaintiff is entitled to prove the same, although on this appeal he contends that in the complaint he makes no such demand. Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred.