Case Name: Rose Burrows, Appellant, v. Jacob Goldberg, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1936-01
Citations: 246 A.D. 822
Docket Number: 
Parties: Rose Burrows, Appellant, v. Jacob Goldberg, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 246
Pages: 822–822

Head Matter:
Rose Burrows, Appellant, v. Jacob Goldberg, Respondent.

Opinion:
In an action to recover damages for alleged malpractice of a physician the jury, after nearly four hours of deliberation, found a verdict for the defendant. The appeal is based solely on the ground that the trial court in its charge made remarks on the evidence prejudicial to the plaintiff. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Young, Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ.