Case Name: Victor J. BRAVO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-03-10
Citations: 174 F. App'x 374
Docket Number: No. 05-56396
Parties: Victor J. BRAVO, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 174
Pages: 374–375

Head Matter:
Victor J. BRAVO, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; et al., Defendants—Appellees.
No. 05-56396.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 6, 2006.
Filed March 10, 2006.
Victor J. Bravo, CTF—Correctional Training Facility Central Facility, Soledad, CA, pro se.
Before: BEEZER, T.G. NELSON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
A review of the record and appellant's response to the court's order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard); Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 486-87, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994) (holding a prisoner's claim for damages under § 1983 is not cognizable if "a judgment in favor of plaintiff would necessarily imply the invalidity of his conviction of sentence" unless the prisoner demonstrates that the conviction has been previously reversed, expunged, of otherwise invalidated).
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.
All pending motions are denied as moot.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.