Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Thomas M. Dowling, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1978-07-06
Citations: 44 N.Y. 999
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Thomas M. Dowling, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 44
Pages: 999–1001

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Thomas M. Dowling, Appellant.
Argued June 1, 1978;
decided July 6, 1978
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Aaron Nussbaum and Edward H. Frieberger for appellant.
Eugene Gold, District Attorney (Michael R. Gore of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
On the undisputed facts, the police officers had probable cause to arrest the defendant. Also, since we have held subdivision 3 of section 265.15 of the Penal Law constitutional (People v Lemmons, 40 NY2d 505), it was not error for the court to instruct the jury on the presumption which it articulates. As to the asserted departure from the stipulation that the District Attorney would present no evidence that the defendant "menaced" the witness Diaz, even if it could be said to have been contravened by the People's putting before the jury information that the defendant had pointed the gun at her, under the circumstances in which it came to be introduced, and on the entire record, it must be regarded as harmless. Finally, we note that, having considered defendant's remaining contentions, we find them without merit.
Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur in memorandum.
Order affirmed.