Case Name: GEORGE ROSADO ET AL. v. BRIDGEPORT ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESAN CORPORATION ET AL.; J. KNECHT v. BRIDGEPORT ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESAN CORPORATION ET AL. IN RE APPLICATION OF NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY FOR ORDER VACATING PROTECTIVE ORDERS AND REQUIRING FILING OF DISCOVERY MATERIALS
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 2003-09-18
Citations: 266 Conn. 906
Docket Number: SC 17060
Parties: GEORGE ROSADO ET AL. v. BRIDGEPORT ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESAN CORPORATION ET AL. J. KNECHT v. BRIDGEPORT ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESAN CORPORATION ET AL. IN RE APPLICATION OF NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY FOR ORDER VACATING PROTECTIVE ORDERS AND REQUIRING FILING OF DISCOVERY MATERIALS
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 266
Pages: 906–907

Head Matter:
GEORGE ROSADO ET AL. v. BRIDGEPORT ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESAN CORPORATION ET AL. J. KNECHT v. BRIDGEPORT ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESAN CORPORATION ET AL. IN RE APPLICATION OF NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY FOR ORDER VACATING PROTECTIVE ORDERS AND REQUIRING FILING OF DISCOVERY MATERIALS

Opinion:
The petition for certification by the New York Times Company, Globe Newspaper Company, Inc., and the Washington Post Company for appeal from the Appellate Court, 77 Conn. App. 690 (AC 23014/AC 23015/AC 23016/AC 23017/AC 23069/AC 23078/AC 23079/AC 23161), is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court improperly granted the application to create a new file?"
The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17060.
James S. Rollins and Kimberly M. White, in support of the petition.
John B. Farley, Joseph T. Sweeney, Ralph W. Johnson III, James V. Somers, James F. Stapleton, John F. Conway and W. Glen Pierson, in opposition.
Decided September 18, 2003
NORCOTT and KATZ, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.