Case Name: Leon SOBEL, et ux., Appellants, v. Barbara S. GOLDMAN and Ivan K. Goldman, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1986-01-23
Citations: 481 So. 2d 991
Docket Number: No. 85-522
Parties: Leon SOBEL, et ux., Appellants, v. Barbara S. GOLDMAN and Ivan K. Goldman, Appellees.
Judges: DAUKSCH, ORFINGER and COWART, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 481
Pages: 991–991

Head Matter:
Leon SOBEL, et ux., Appellants, v. Barbara S. GOLDMAN and Ivan K. Goldman, Appellees.
No. 85-522.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Jan. 23, 1986.
Albert C. Eaton, of Law Offices of Marvin Newman, Orlando, for appellants.
Mark Ellis Solomon, Orlando, for appel-lees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The order denying appellants' motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum served on them is a non-final order and is not among those non-final orders which may be appealed. Fla.R.App.P. 9.130. If we treat the appeal as a petition for writ of certiora-ri, petitioners have not demonstrated any departure from the essential requirements of law, so they are not entitled to certiorari relief.
Appeal DISMISSED.
DAUKSCH, ORFINGER and COWART, JJ., concur.