Case Name: In the Matter of the Review of 1971 Reapportionment of Oregon Relating to Senators and Representatives. REED, Petitioner, v. MYERS, Defendant
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1971-09-30
Citations: 260 Or. 173
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Review of 1971 Reapportionment of Oregon Relating to Senators and Representatives. REED, Petitioner, v. MYERS, Defendant.
Judges: Before O’Connell, Chief Justice, and McAllister, Denecke, Tongue, Howell and Bryson, Justices.
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 260
Pages: 173–173

Head Matter:
Argued September 8,
petition dismissed September 30, 1971
In the Matter of the Review of 1971 Reapportionment of Oregon Relating to Senators and Representatives. REED, Petitioner, v. MYERS, Defendant.
489 P2d 691
John Miller Peed, Engene, argued the cause and submitted briefs pro se.
Lee Johnson, Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause in support of 1971 reapportionment of Oregon relating to Senators and Representatives. With him on the briefs was John W. Osburn, Solicitor General, Salem.
Before O’Connell, Chief Justice, and McAllister, Denecke, Tongue, Howell and Bryson, Justices.

Opinion:
DENECKE, J.
The petition is dismissed. Petitioner's objections to the plan are discussed in Hovet v. Myers, 260 Or 152, 489 P2d 684, and State ex rel Allen v. Myers, 260 Or 170, 488 P2d 1184, decided this date.