Case Name: In the Matter of Betty Crosney, as Administratrix with the Will Annexed of Sam Bernard, Deceased, Respondent, against F. D'Onofrio, Inc., Judgment Debtor, et al., Appellants
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1941-11-27
Citations: 287 N.Y. 652
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Betty Crosney, as Administratrix with the Will Annexed of Sam Bernard, Deceased, Respondent, against F. D’Onofrio, Inc., Judgment Debtor, et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 287
Pages: 652–653

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Betty Crosney, as Administratrix with the Will Annexed of Sam Bernard, Deceased, Respondent, against F. D’Onofrio, Inc., Judgment Debtor, et al., Appellants.
Submitted November 17, 1941;
decided November 27, 1941.
Julian Buchbinder and Samuel Sprung for motion.
Abraham Shamos opposed.

Opinion:
Motion by individual defendants granted and leave to appeal by corporate defendant denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements, on the ground that as to it the order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.