Case Name: UNION OF SIBERIAN CO-OPERATIVE UNIONS, Inc., v. ARONSTAM; UNION OF SIBERIAN CREAMERY ASSOCIATIONS, Inc., v. SAME
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1920-04-14
Citations: 265 F. 1022
Docket Number: 
Parties: UNION OF SIBERIAN CO-OPERATIVE UNIONS, Inc., v. ARONSTAM. UNION OF SIBERIAN CREAMERY ASSOCIATIONS, Inc., v. SAME.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter
Volume: 265
Pages: 1022–1022

Head Matter:
UNION OF SIBERIAN CO-OPERATIVE UNIONS, Inc., v. ARONSTAM. UNION OF SIBERIAN CREAMERY ASSOCIATIONS, Inc., v. SAME.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
April 14, 1920.)
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Actions at law by Charles S. Aronstam against the Union of Siberian Co-operative Unions, Incorporated, and against the Union of Siberian Creamery Associations, Incorporated. Judgments for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.
Affirmed.
McAdoo, Cotton & Franklin, of New York City (George S. Franklin and Emanuel J. Myers, both of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs in error. Victor E. Gartz, of New York City (John P. Murray, of New York City, of counsel), for defendant in error.
Before WARD, HOUGH, and MANTON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Judgments affirmed, on the ground that the writ of error is frivolous.