Case Name: Johnny Lee LUCAS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Willie EAGLETON, Warden of Evans Correctional Institution; Charles Condon, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents-Appellees; Johnny Lee Lucas, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Willie Eagleton, Warden of Evans Correctional Institution; Charles Condon, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-10-21
Citations: 78 F. App'x 279
Docket Number: Nos. 03-7025, 03-7199
Parties: Johnny Lee LUCAS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Willie EAGLETON, Warden of Evans Correctional Institution; Charles Condon, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents-Appellees. Johnny Lee Lucas, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Willie Eagleton, Warden of Evans Correctional Institution; Charles Condon, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 78
Pages: 279–280

Head Matter:
Johnny Lee LUCAS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Willie EAGLETON, Warden of Evans Correctional Institution; Charles Condon, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents-Appellees. Johnny Lee Lucas, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Willie Eagleton, Warden of Evans Correctional Institution; Charles Condon, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents-Appellees.
Nos. 03-7025, 03-7199.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 9, 2003.
Decided Oct. 21, 2003.
Johnny Lee Lucas, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Creighton Waters, Office of the Attorney General of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Johnny Lee Lucas seeks to appeal the district court's orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000), and his motion to alter or amend (Appeal No. 03-7025), as well as the district court's order denying him a certificate of appealability (Appeal No. 03-7199). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by the district court on the merits absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Lucas has not made the requisite showing. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeals. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.