Case Name: Arthur O. FRANKLIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1986-12-16
Citations: 498 So. 2d 1035
Docket Number: No. BK-300
Parties: Arthur O. FRANKLIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: JOANOS, THOMPSON and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 498
Pages: 1035–1035

Head Matter:
Arthur O. FRANKLIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. BK-300.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Dec. 16, 1986.
Michael E. Allen, Public Defender and Carl S. McGinnes, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Gregory G. Costas, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Notwithstanding this court's prior remand of this case with instructions to the trial court to resentence the appellant in conformity with the provisions of § 39.-111(6), Fla.Stat. (1983), see, Franklin v. State, 476 So.2d 1346 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), we find the case again before us on a record which does not include a written statement of reasons justifying imposition of adult sanctions as is required by § 39.-111(6)(d). Accordingly, we again reverse the sentence and remand for resentencing.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
JOANOS, THOMPSON and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.