Case Name: Russell BRYANT, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-11-13
Citations: 385 S.W.3d 525
Docket Number: No. ED 97547
Parties: Russell BRYANT, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., MARY K HOFF, J., and LISA S. VAN AMBURG, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 385
Pages: 525–525

Head Matter:
Russell BRYANT, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 97547.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Nov. 13, 2012.
Motion For Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Dec. 13, 2012.
Andrew Edward Zleit, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., MARY K HOFF, J., and LISA S. VAN AMBURG, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Russell Bryant appeals from the motion court's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Order and Judgment denying his Rule 29.15 Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact and conclusions of law that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).