Case Name: Nathaniel SHAW, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1983-12-28
Citations: 443 So. 2d 342
Docket Number: No. 83-630
Parties: Nathaniel SHAW, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: HOBSON, A.C.J., and RYDER and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 443
Pages: 342–343

Head Matter:
Nathaniel SHAW, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 83-630.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Dec. 28, 1983.
Jerry Hill, Public Defender, L.S. Alper-stein, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow.
Nathaniel Shaw, pro se.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corees, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Nathaniel Shaw appeals a judgment and sentence rendered following an order denying his motion to discharge under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191.
Shaw's attorney filed an Anders brief. Upon notification of this fact, Shaw filed a pro se brief. After an independent examination of the record and the law, we find no merit to this appeal.
Accordingly, the judgment and sentence are affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
HOBSON, A.C.J., and RYDER and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.
. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). -•