Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bruce TERRY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-06-23
Citations: 101 F. App'x 476
Docket Number: No. 03-51389
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bruce TERRY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 101
Pages: 476–476

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bruce TERRY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 03-51389.
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Decided June 23, 2004.
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Bruce Terry, #27254-180, Beaumont, TX, pro se.
Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Court-appointed counsel for Bruce Terry has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Terry has filed a response, arguing that his trial attorney provided ineffective assistance and that the prosecutor engaged in misconduct by seeking to have Terry sentenced as a career offender without investigating Terry's criminal history. Terry also asserts that he did not receive the benefit of the representations made by the prosecutor to Terry's attorney in order to obtain Terry's guilty plea.
Our independent review of the brief, Terry's response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. To the extent that Terry raises claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, the record is not adequately developed for us to consider this issue on appeal. See United States v. Sanchez-Pena, 336 F.3d 431, 445-16 (5th Cir.2003). Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cm. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.