Case Name: Samuel R. ANSTEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Howard PAINTER, Mount Olive Correctional Complex, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-10-09
Citations: 20 F. App'x 171
Docket Number: No. 00-6521
Parties: Samuel R. ANSTEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Howard PAINTER, Mount Olive Correctional Complex, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 20
Pages: 171–172

Head Matter:
Samuel R. ANSTEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Howard PAINTER, Mount Olive Correctional Complex, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 00-6521.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 20, 2001.
Decided Oct. 9, 2001.
Samuel R. Anstey, pro se. Leah Perry Macia, Bailey & Glasser, L.L.P., Charleston, WV, for appellee.
Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Samuel R. Anstey seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Anstey's motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Anstey v. Painter, No. CA-99-120-5 (S.D.W.Va. Mar. 16, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.