Case Name: GOLDSMITH, Appellant, v. SACHS, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1899-12-28
Citations: 61 N.Y.S. 1137
Docket Number: 
Parties: GOLDSMITH, Appellant, v. SACHS, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 61
Pages: 1137–1137

Head Matter:
GOLDSMITH, Appellant, v. SACHS, Respondent.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,
December 28, 1899.)
Action by Isaiah Goldth against Philip Sachs. From a judgment defendant, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed. Otto Droege, for appellant. Jacob B. Engel, for ondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The disputed questions of —whether the note was transferred to the tiff before^ or after maturity, and whether consideration passed between the original 'es—were resolved against the plaintiff, and record presents nothing for our consideration granting interference with the judgment, ent affirmed, with costs to respondent.