Case Name: Michael James HICKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. WALKER, Warden; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-03-09
Citations: 317 F. App'x 689
Docket Number: No. 08-17262
Parties: Michael James HICKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. WALKER, Warden; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, HAWKINS and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 317
Pages: 689–690

Head Matter:
Michael James HICKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. WALKER, Warden; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 08-17262.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 23, 2009.
Filed March 9, 2009.
Michael James Hicks, Represa, CA, pro se.
Before KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, HAWKINS and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
A review of the record and appellant's response to this court's order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). The district court properly dismissed the action without prejudice because appellant admitted in his complaint that he failed to exhaust administrative remedies. See Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1120 (9th Cir.2002).
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.