Case Name: Mallary, Inc., Individually and in Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated, Appellant, v. City of New Rochelle, Respondent. (Action No. 2.)
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1944-10-23
Citations: 268 A.D. 878
Docket Number: 
Parties: Mallary, Inc., Individually and in Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated, Appellant, v. City of New Rochelle, Respondent. (Action No. 2.)
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 268
Pages: 878–878

Head Matter:
Mallary, Inc., Individually and in Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated, Appellant, v. City of New Rochelle, Respondent. (Action No. 2.)

Opinion:
In an action to restrain defendant from enforcing an ordinance compelling the removal of signs erected and maintained by plaintiff, and by others similarly situated, judgment dismissing the complaint unanimously affirmed, with costs. By the ordinance the municipality merely exercises the right to remove encroachments extending over the sidewalk, street or highway. Present— Close, P. ,J" Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Lewis, JJ. [184 Misc. 66.] [See post, p. 914.]