Case Name: SINCLAIR REFINING COMPANY et al., Appellants, v. William A. JACOB, Trustee of J. A. Lanehart Construction Co., Bankrupt, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1966-02-10
Citations: 356 F.2d 941
Docket Number: No. 22397
Parties: SINCLAIR REFINING COMPANY et al., Appellants, v. William A. JACOB, Trustee of J. A. Lanehart Construction Co., Bankrupt, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 356
Pages: 941–941

Head Matter:
SINCLAIR REFINING COMPANY et al., Appellants, v. William A. JACOB, Trustee of J. A. Lanehart Construction Co., Bankrupt, Appellee.
No. 22397.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
Feb. 10, 1966.
C. Parkhill Mays, Jr., Lakeland, Fla., L. Robert Frank, Tampa, Fla., Holland, Bevis, Smith, Kibler & Hall, Bartow, Fla., Allen, Dell, Frank & Trinkle, Tampa, Fla., for appellants.
Lewis H. Hill, III, of Hill, Hill & Dickenson, Tampa, Fla., for appellee.
Before JONES and BROWN, Circuit Judges, and BREWSTER, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The principles controlling the disposition of this appeal are set forth in the opinion in the recent case of Willard v. Petruska, 5th Cir. 1966, 356 F.2d 422. The factual differences between that case and the case before us are not such as require a different result. Following the precedent there announced, the judgment of the district court from which this appeal is taken should be and it is hereby
Reversed and remanded.