Case Name: Sid Johnson v. The State
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1925-11-18
Citations: 102 Tex. Crim. 136
Docket Number: No. 9507
Parties: Sid Johnson v. The State.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Criminal Reports
Volume: 102
Pages: 136–136

Head Matter:
Sid Johnson v. The State.
No. 9507.
Delivered November 18, 1925.
The opinion states the case.
J. S. Wheeless and S. E. Bomat, for appellant.
Sam D. Stinson, State’s Attorney, and Nat Gentry, Jr., Assistant State’s Attorney, for the State.

Opinion:
LATTIMORE, Judge.
Appellant was convicted in the District Court of Kerr County of possessing mash for the purpose of manufacturing intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at one year in the penitentiary.
Appellant was a negro who had entered upon and was occupying a house belonging to another party, in which house, when searched by officers, a barrel of mash was found. That same was mash is certified to positively by one witness and circumstantially by others. Appellant's only defense was that he did not put the mash there and had nothing to do with it. He testified that it was put there by another party. The court affirmatively instructed the jury that if they believed or had a reasonable doubt as to whether the mash was put there by said other party they should acquit. The jury solved this question against appellant. The record is before us without any bills of exception. The facts are substantially as above stated.
Finding no error iri the record, the judgment .will be affirmed.
Affirmed.