Case Name: Patricia ARNOLD, Appellant, v. KERNZ GROUP FINE ARTS EXPRESS SERVICES and Division of Employment Security, Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-08-14
Citations: 372 S.W.3d 926
Docket Number: No. ED 97627
Parties: Patricia ARNOLD, Appellant, v. KERNZ GROUP FINE ARTS EXPRESS SERVICES and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.
Judges: Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., PATRICIA L. COHEN, J., and KURT S. ODENWALD, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 372
Pages: 926–926

Head Matter:
Patricia ARNOLD, Appellant, v. KERNZ GROUP FINE ARTS EXPRESS SERVICES and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.
No. ED 97627.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Aug. 14, 2012.
Martin L. Perron St. Louis, for appellant.
Francis E. Pennington III, St. Louis, MO, for respondent Kernz Group Fine Arts Express.
Robert A. Bedell, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent Div. of Employment Security.
Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., PATRICIA L. COHEN, J., and KURT S. ODENWALD, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Patricia Arnold (Claimant) appeals from the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) denying her claim for unemployment benefits because she was discharged for misconduct connected with work.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error in any of the respects alleged. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the Commission's order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).