Case Name: Christopher Bernard JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Perry S. LUTHI, Sr.; Desmine Sardine; Luthi Mortgage Company, Incorporated; Carolina Tax Service; Luthi Construction Company; Liberty Funding; General Funding; Perry S. Luthi, Jr.; Martha Pace; Lori Murphy; Carol A. Simpson; Ira Handy; Handy Moisture & Pest Control; Pete Peterson; Ron Platt; Marsha Platt; Sonny Ninan; Michael Doe; Dee Dee Doe; Kim Doe, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-04-29
Citations: 324 F. App'x 253
Docket Number: No. 08-1762
Parties: Christopher Bernard JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Perry S. LUTHI, Sr.; Desmine Sardine; Luthi Mortgage Company, Incorporated; Carolina Tax Service; Luthi Construction Company; Liberty Funding; General Funding; Perry S. Luthi, Jr.; Martha Pace; Lori Murphy; Carol A. Simpson; Ira Handy; Handy Moisture & Pest Control; Pete Peterson; Ron Platt; Marsha Platt; Sonny Ninan; Michael Doe; Dee Dee Doe; Kim Doe, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 324
Pages: 253–253

Head Matter:
Christopher Bernard JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Perry S. LUTHI, Sr.; Desmine Sardine; Luthi Mortgage Company, Incorporated; Carolina Tax Service; Luthi Construction Company; Liberty Funding; General Funding; Perry S. Luthi, Jr.; Martha Pace; Lori Murphy; Carol A. Simpson; Ira Handy; Handy Moisture & Pest Control; Pete Peterson; Ron Platt; Marsha Platt; Sonny Ninan; Michael Doe; Dee Dee Doe; Kim Doe, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 08-1762.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 31, 2009.
Decided: April 29, 2009.
Christopher Bernard Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Melvin Hutson, Melvin Hutson, PA, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appel-lees. Carol A. Simpson, Ron Platt, Marsha Platt, Greenville, South Carolina; Ira Handy, Taylors, South Carolina, Appellees Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Bernard Jones appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying his motion for summary judgment and granting summary judgment in favor of all defendants on his federal civil claims and dismissing his state law claims under 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. Luthi, 586 F.Supp.2d 595 (2008). We deny Jones' motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.