Case Name: Samuel CHRISTOPHER and Christopher Joy, Inc., Appellants, v. Thelma CHRISTOPHER, Individually, and as the personal representative of the Estate of Charles Christopher, Jr., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2008-12-12
Citations: 998 So. 2d 1167
Docket Number: No. 1D08-4486
Parties: Samuel CHRISTOPHER and Christopher Joy, Inc., Appellants, v. Thelma CHRISTOPHER, Individually, and as the personal representative of the Estate of Charles Christopher, Jr., Appellees.
Judges: LEWIS and THOMAS, JJ., and LAWRENCE, JR., L. ARTHUR, Senior-Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 998
Pages: 1167–1168

Head Matter:
Samuel CHRISTOPHER and Christopher Joy, Inc., Appellants, v. Thelma CHRISTOPHER, Individually, and as the personal representative of the Estate of Charles Christopher, Jr., Appellees.
No. 1D08-4486.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Dec. 12, 2008.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 13, 2009.
Kevin S. Sanders, Jacksonville, for Appellants.
Jeb T. Branham, Jacksonville Beach, for Appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED. Caufield v. Cantele, 837 So.2d 371, 375 (Fla.2002) (reaffirming the traditional test for finality requiring that "no further action by the court will be necessary"). See also Staten v. Gonzalez-Falla, 855 So.2d 247 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (dismissing appeal of order that reserved jurisdiction to determine metes and bounds of easement granted by the order); Massachusetts Life Ins. Co. v. Crapo, 918 So.2d 393, 394 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (dismissing appeal of order that disposed of one of several interrelated claims).
LEWIS and THOMAS, JJ., and LAWRENCE, JR., L. ARTHUR, Senior-Judge, concur.