Case Name: STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Nicholas William SERAFINE, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2003-12-19
Citations: 861 So. 2d 522
Docket Number: No. 5D03-3570
Parties: STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Nicholas William SERAFINE, Appellee.
Judges: SHARP, W., and MONACO, JJ„ concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 861
Pages: 522–523

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Nicholas William SERAFINE, Appellee.
No. 5D03-3570.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Dec. 19, 2003.
John Tanner, State Attorney, and Jaime Telfer, Assistant State Attorney, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
No Appearance for Appellee.

Opinion:
GRIFFIN, J.
This is the State's appeal of the trial court's order suppressing evidence consisting of urine test results on the authority of State v. Bodden, 27 Fla. L. Weekly D2382, — So.2d — (Fla. 2d DCA Oct.30, 2002), review granted, 853 So.2d 1071 (Fla.2003). We recently decided State v. Pierre, 854 So.2d 231 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003), in which we disagreed with Bodden, reversed the suppression order and certified conflict with Bodden. Following Pierre, we again reverse the appealed order and certify conflict with Bodden.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
SHARP, W., and MONACO, JJ" concur.
. Tpii; public case was certified to be one of great ^importance. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.160(e)(2).
. See also State v. Masker, 859 So.2d 553 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).