Case Name: In the Interest of B.C.C., T.A.C., and C.Y.A.C.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-03-18
Citations: 107 S.W.3d 340
Docket Number: No. ED 81842
Parties: In the Interest of B.C.C., T.A.C., and C.Y.A.C.
Judges: Before MARY R. RUSSELL, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 107
Pages: 340–340

Head Matter:
In the Interest of B.C.C., T.A.C., and C.Y.A.C.
No. ED 81842.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
March 18, 2003.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 5, 2003.
Application for Transfer Denied July 1, 2003.
Shelly Thomas-Benke, Charles, MO, for appellant.
Timothy J. Smith, St. Louis, MO, for Guardian ad Litem/Juvenile.
Karen Dill Siegel, Family Court-Juvenile Division, St. Louis, MO, for respondents.
Before MARY R. RUSSELL, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Byron Caffey appeals from the judgment of the juvenile court terminating his parental rights to B.C.C., T.A.C., and C.Y.A.C. The trial court found that statutory grounds for termination existed and that termination was in the best interests of the children. We find no error and affirm.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).