Case Name: Lacey Mark SIVAK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Timothy D. WILSON; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-03-25
Citations: 646 F. App'x 523
Docket Number: No. 14-35877
Parties: Lacey Mark SIVAK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Timothy D. WILSON; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before: GOODWIN, LEAVY, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 646
Pages: 523–524

Head Matter:
Lacey Mark SIVAK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Timothy D. WILSON; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 14-35877.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 15, 2016.
Filed March 25, 2016.
Lacey Mark Sivak, Boise, ID, pro se.
Before: GOODWIN, LEAVY, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Lacey Mark Sivak, an Idaho state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court's order denying his request to file various actions. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion the application of a vexatious litigant order. Moy v. United States, 906 F.2d 467, 469 (9th Cir.1990). We affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion in revising a prior pre-filing order to conform to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and in applying the revised order to Sivak's proposed actions.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.