Case Name: Jeannette TAYLOR, Claimant/Appellant, v. RIVERVIEW GARDENS SCHOOL DISTRICT, Employer/Respondent, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-02-07
Citations: 358 S.W.3d 560
Docket Number: No. ED 96641
Parties: Jeannette TAYLOR, Claimant/Appellant, v. RIVERVIEW GARDENS SCHOOL DISTRICT, Employer/Respondent, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 358
Pages: 560–561

Head Matter:
Jeannette TAYLOR, Claimant/Appellant, v. RIVERVIEW GARDENS SCHOOL DISTRICT, Employer/Respondent, and Division of Employment Security, Respondent.
No. ED 96641.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Feb. 7, 2012.
Steven Edward Dyer, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Bart Anton Matanic, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent Div. of Emp. Sec.
Riverview Gardens School District, St. Louis, MO, acting pro se.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Jeannette Taylor appeals from a decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, Division of Employment Security, denying her unemployment compensation benefits. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. The Commission's decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. An extended opinion would have no precedential value or serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).