Case Name: Johnny M. BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Washington, D.C., Individually and in their official capacities; Jean B. Hudson, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, Individually and in their official capacities, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-01-09
Citations: 212 F. App'x 193
Docket Number: No. 06-7320
Parties: Johnny M. BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Washington, D.C., Individually and in their official capacities; Jean B. Hudson, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, Individually and in their official capacities, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 212
Pages: 193–193

Head Matter:
Johnny M. BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Washington, D.C., Individually and in their official capacities; Jean B. Hudson, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, Individually and in their official capacities, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 06-7320.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 20, 2006.
Decided: Jan. 9, 2007.
Johnny M. Brown, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Johnny M. Brown appeals the district court's order dismissing this action brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauper-, is and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. United States Attorney's Office, No. 1:06-cv-00582-CMH (E.D. Va., filed July 10, 2006; entered July 11, 2006). We deny the motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
The district court incorrectly identified Brown as a Virginia state prisoner. Brown is a federal prisoner who must challenge his conviction and sentence in a motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). The district court is directed to issue an amended order reflecting these corrections.