Case Name: Mary Elizabeth SIMA, Appellant, v. Celestine Raymond SIMA, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1976-10-06
Citations: 337 So. 2d 863
Docket Number: No. 76-1239
Parties: Mary Elizabeth SIMA, Appellant, v. Celestine Raymond SIMA, Appellee.
Judges: HOBSON, Acting C. J., and GRIMES and SCHEB, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 337
Pages: 863–863

Head Matter:
Mary Elizabeth SIMA, Appellant, v. Celestine Raymond SIMA, Appellee.
No. 76-1239.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Oct. 6, 1976.
J. E. Satterfield of The Legal Aid Society, Clearwater, for appellant.
Sondra Goldenfarb, Joseph G. Donahey, Jr., Clearwater, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Pursuant to the authority of Lee v. Lee, 309 So.2d 26, Fla.App.2d 1975, a trial court has jurisdiction to hear evidence and decide whether a modification of rehabilitative alimony should be granted or, if the circumstances warrant, a complete revisitation of the alimony question.
Therefore, the trial court erred in holding that it was limited in its jurisdiction to only extending the rehabilitative alimony.
Accordingly, the order appealed is reversed and the case remanded for a hearing in accordance with this opinion.
HOBSON, Acting C. J., and GRIMES and SCHEB, JJ., concur.