Case Name: The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Rogelio HERNANDEZ, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-02-05
Citations: 573 So. 2d 1037
Docket Number: No. 90-67
Parties: The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Rogelio HERNANDEZ, Appellee.
Judges: Before FERGUSON, JORGENSON and GERSTEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 573
Pages: 1037–1038

Head Matter:
The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Rogelio HERNANDEZ, Appellee.
No. 90-67.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 5, 1991.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Giselle D. Lylen, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Howard K. Blumberg, Asst. Public Defender, for appellee.
Before FERGUSON, JORGENSON and GERSTEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We summarily reverse the order granting an ore tenus motion to dismiss an information which charges the defendant with grand theft of an automobile. State v. Adderly, 411 So.2d 981 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982) (a motion to dismiss an information must specifically allege the grounds on which it is based); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.190(a).
Reversed and remanded for further consistent proceedings.
. Pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191(g), the State has a ninety day period in which to bring the defendant to trial following the date of receipt by the trial court of this mandate.