Case Name: Riva Teleschevsky, Respondent, v. Red Apple Fruit and Grocery Corp., Doing Business as Lerman's, et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2010-03-02
Citations: 71 A.D.3d 667
Docket Number: 
Parties: Riva Teleschevsky, Respondent, v Red Apple Fruit and Grocery Corp., Doing Business as Lerman’s, et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 71
Pages: 667–667

Head Matter:
Riva Teleschevsky, Respondent, v Red Apple Fruit and Grocery Corp., Doing Business as Lerman’s, et al., Appellants.
[894 NYS2d 898]

Opinion:
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bunyan, J.), dated May 20, 2009, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff alleges that she tripped and fell over a wooden pallet which protruded several inches outward from beneath a display of watermelons in the defendants' fruit and vegetable store. After joinder of issue, the defendants moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The defendants failed to establish their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the complaint (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 3NY2d 851, 853 [1985]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendants' motion. Prudenti, P.J., Dillon, Eng and Roman, JJ., concur.