Case Name: In the Matter of Ricardo M.J., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. Kiomara A., Appellant; Commissioner of the Administration for Children's Services, City of New York, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2016-10-11
Citations: 143 A.D.3d 503
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Ricardo M.J., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. Kiomara A., Appellant; Commissioner of the Administration for Children’s Services, City of New York, Respondent.
Judges: Concur — Mazzarelli, J.R, Sweeny, Acosta, Moskowitz and Gesmer, JJ.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 143
Pages: 503–503

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Ricardo M.J., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. Kiomara A., Appellant; Commissioner of the Administration for Children’s Services, City of New York, Respondent.
[38 NYS3d 196]

Opinion:
Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Erik S. Pitchal, J.), entered on or about March 21, 2014, which to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, brings up for review a fact-finding order, same court and Judge, entered on or about November 13, 2013, which found that respondent mother neglected the subject child, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from fact-finding order, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the order of disposition. The record supports the court's determination that the mother neglected the child by inflicting excessive corporal punishment on him. The social worker testified that the child reported that the mother beat him with a belt with spikes "all the time," the mother admitted beating him, and he appeared to be afraid of her. His out of court statements were corroborated by the bruises the social worker observed on the child's body and the statements the child made to the detective (see Matter of Joshua B., 28 AD3d 759, 761 [2d Dept 2006]; Matter of Samara M., 19 AD3d 214 [1st Dept 2005]).
The court's credibility assessment is entitled to the "greatest respect" on appeal (see Matter of Irene O., 38 NY2d 776, 777 [1975]), and is supported by the record in that the mother provided varying explanations for the bruises on the child's body (see Matter of Mia B. [Brandy R.], 100 AD3d 569, 569-570 [2012], lv denied 20 NY3d 858 [2013]).
We have considered the mother's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.
Concur — Mazzarelli, J.R, Sweeny, Acosta, Moskowitz and Gesmer, JJ.