Case Name: Jerry L. LINDSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R.C. LEE, Warden; Robert Terry, Jr., Disciplinary Hearing Officer, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-10-17
Citations: 48 F. App'x 89
Docket Number: No. 02-6994
Parties: Jerry L. LINDSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R.C. LEE, Warden; Robert Terry, Jr., Disciplinary Hearing Officer, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 48
Pages: 89–89

Head Matter:
Jerry L. LINDSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R.C. LEE, Warden; Robert Terry, Jr., Disciplinary Hearing Officer, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 02-6994.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 10, 2002.
Decided Oct. 17, 2002.
Jerry L. Lindsey, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Jerry L. Lindsey appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint in which he alleged that he did not receive adequate notice of disciplinary charges prior to a prison disciplinary hearing. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court that no constitutional rights were implicated by the alleged lack of adequate notice. See Lindsey v. Lee, No. CA-02-255-5-H (E.D.N.C. May 23, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.