Case Name: ANNA L. RABOLD, Appellant, v. ISAAC A. RABOLD, Respondent
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1933-01-10
Citations: 141 Or. 701
Docket Number: 
Parties: ANNA L. RABOLD, Appellant, v. ISAAC A. RABOLD, Respondent.
Judges: Eand, C. J., Belt and Eossman, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 141
Pages: 701–701

Head Matter:
Argued January 4;
affirmed January 10;
rehearing denied January 31, 1933
ANNA L. RABOLD, Appellant, v. ISAAC A. RABOLD, Respondent.
(17 P. (2d) 1119)
W. E. Richardson, of Portland, for appellant.
L. W. O’Rouke, of Portland (Oren Eichards, of Portland, on the brief), for respondent.

Opinion:
KELLY, J.
A careful reading of the record results in the conclusion that the learned trial judge arrived at the proper solution of the questions involved herein. No good purpose can be served by here placing of record an analysis of the evidence. No new question of law is involved.
It is ordered that the decree of the circuit court be and the same is affirmed, and that neither party recover costs or disbursements herein.
Eand, C. J., Belt and Eossman, JJ., concur.