Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Joshua M. TILSON, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-07-15
Citations: 415 F.3d 815
Docket Number: No. 04-3434
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Joshua M. TILSON, Appellant.
Judges: Before MELLOY, McMILLIAN and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 415
Pages: 815–816

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Joshua M. TILSON, Appellant.
No. 04-3434.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 21, 2004.
Filed: July 15, 2005.
Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied Aug. 18, 2005.
Counsel who represented the appellant was Gary E. Brotherton of Columbia, MO.
Counsel who represented the appellee was David C. Jones, AUSA, of Springfield, MO.
Before MELLOY, McMILLIAN and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
MELLOY, Circuit Judge.
Joshua M. Tilson entered a guilty plea to unlawful transport of firearms and was sentenced to 180 months in prison. The judgment was entered on July 8, 2004, and his deadline to file a notice of appeal was due July 22, 2004. See Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(1)(A); 26(a)(2). Defendant filed his motion to extend time to file notice of appeal on August 13, 2004. See Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5)(A)(ii) (allowing the district court to extend the time to file a notice of appeal if the petitioner shows "excusable neglect or good cause"). The district court denied the motion.
We review a denial of a motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal for an abuse of discretion. Gibbons v. United States, 317 F.3d 852, 853-54 (8th Cir.2003). We find there was no abuse of discretion below because Tilson failed to show excusable neglect or good cause for his filing delay. Further, even if we were to reach the merits of his appeal, Tilson would not be entitled to relief. Tilson seeks to appeal his sentence based on supposed judicial fact-finding in violation of Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004). Tilson's argument is that the district court should not have considered Tilsoris three prior violent felonies in calculating his sentence. However, Blakely does not apply to the fact of a prior conviction. 124 S.Ct. at 2536. The judgment of the district court is therefore affirmed.
. The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr., United States District Court Judge for the Western District of Missouri.