Case Name: Michael MENGORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1998-10-01
Citations: 718 So. 2d 368
Docket Number: No. 98-2934
Parties: Michael MENGORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: GUNTHER, POLEN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 718
Pages: 368–368

Head Matter:
Michael MENGORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 98-2934.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Oct. 1, 1998.
Michael Mengore, Fort Lauderdale, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant Michael David Mengore appeals a trial court order denying his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. His motion was properly verified, but the factual allegations in his memorandum of law contained a defective verification clause in which he said that the statements were "true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief." See Scott v. State, 464 So.2d 1171 (Fla.1985); Hahn v. Frederick, 66 So.2d 823 (Fla.1953).
Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's denial of post-conviction relief. This disposition is without prejudice to appellant's right to timely resubmit the motion and memorandum with a proper oath.
GUNTHER, POLEN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.