Case Name: COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Respondent, v. MARBLEHEAD LAND COMPANY (a Corporation) et al., Appellants
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1928-12-21
Citations: 95 Cal. App. 799
Docket Number: Civ. No. 5380
Parties: COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Respondent, v. MARBLEHEAD LAND COMPANY (a Corporation) et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports
Volume: 95
Pages: 799–799

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 5380.
Second Appellate District, Division One.
December 21, 1928.]
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Respondent, v. MARBLEHEAD LAND COMPANY (a Corporation) et al., Appellants.
Richard Hartley and William J. Clark for Appellants.
Everett W. Mattoon, County Counsel, and Hill & Morgan for Respondent.

Opinion:
THE COURT.
The defendants having filed their bill of costs and disbursements, the court, on motion duly made, struck from the bill sundry large items, and allowed costs in a greatly reduced sum. From the order so made, the defendants appeal.
The questions of law presented on this appeal are substantially the same as those discussed in City of Los Angeles v. Vickers, 81 Cal. App. 737 [254 Pac. 687], where the principles which apply here are very clearly stated. In accordance with the decision in that case, it is ordered that the order from which defendants appeal be, and the same hereby is, affirmed.