Case Name: Steven J. PORKOLAB, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2016-03-23
Citations: 187 So. 3d 945
Docket Number: No. 3D15-429
Parties: Steven J. PORKOLAB, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before EMAS, LOGUE and SCALES, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 187
Pages: 945–945

Head Matter:
Steven J. PORKOLAB, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D15-429.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 23, 2016.
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender and Susan Lerner, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jacob Addicott, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before EMAS, LOGUE and SCALES, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed without prejudice to appellant filing with the trial court a facially sufficient motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), See Johnson v. State, 60 So.3d 1045 (Fla.2011) (recognizing that rule 3.800(a) places the burden on the movant to demonstrate an entitlement to relief on the face of the record); Burgess v. State, 831 So.2d 137 (Fla.2002) (noting that a claim raised in a motion under 3.800(a) must be capable of being resolved as a matter of law, without an evidentiary determination, and on the face of the existing court record).