Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tishard Romell BROWN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-03-27
Citations: 559 F. App'x 938
Docket Number: No. 13-13220
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tishard Romell BROWN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before PRYOR, MARTIN, and FAY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 559
Pages: 938–939

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tishard Romell BROWN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-13220
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
March 27, 2014.
R. Brian Tanner, James D. Durham, Tania D. Groover, Brian T. Rafferty, Ed ward J. Tarver, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Savannah, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Robert Nason Nye, III, The Nye Law Group, PC, Savannah, GA, Tishard Romell Brown, FCI Coleman Low-Inmate Legal Mail, Coleman, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before PRYOR, MARTIN, and FAY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Robert Nye, appointed counsel for Tish-ard Brown in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Brown, arguing that there are no non-frivolous grounds on which Brown could appeal either his conviction or his sentence. Nye filed a brief identifying arguable issues for appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Brown did not respond to Nye's motion to withdraw or the Anders brief.
After a careful, independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no non-frivolous grounds on which Brown could base an appeal. For this reason, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Brown's conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.