Case Name: Roger MATTES, Petitioner, v. Lewis KATES, Respondent at No. 321 M.D.; Roger MATTES, Individually, and Mattes & Mattes, P.C., Petitioners, v. Jerome BARTH, Audrey Barth, West Mountain Poultry Company and Lewis Kates, Respondents at No. 322 M.D
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1996-07-11
Citations: 678 A.2d 361
Docket Number: 
Parties: Roger MATTES, Petitioner, v. Lewis KATES, Respondent at No. 321 M.D. Roger MATTES, Individually, and Mattes & Mattes, P.C., Petitioners, v. Jerome BARTH, Audrey Barth, West Mountain Poultry Company and Lewis Kates, Respondents at No. 322 M.D.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 678
Pages: 361–362

Head Matter:
Roger MATTES, Petitioner, v. Lewis KATES, Respondent at No. 321 M.D. Roger MATTES, Individually, and Mattes & Mattes, P.C., Petitioners, v. Jerome BARTH, Audrey Barth, West Mountain Poultry Company and Lewis Kates, Respondents at No. 322 M.D.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
July 11, 1996.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 11th day of July, 1996, the Petitions for Allowance of Appeal are hereby GRANTED, BUT LIMITED to the following issue: Whether the Superior Court erred in finding that Lackawanna County Local Rule of Court 1028(h) is not violative of Pennsylva-nía Rule of Civil Procedure 239(f).