Case Name: Melbourne E. MOON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF NEW YORK and County of Ontario, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1956-01-23
Citations: 229 F.2d 152
Docket Number: No. 228, Docket 23504
Parties: Melbourne E. MOON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF NEW YORK and County of Ontario, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 229
Pages: 152–152

Head Matter:
Melbourne E. MOON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF NEW YORK and County of Ontario, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 228, Docket 23504.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued Jan. 9, 1956.
Decided Jan. 23, 1956.
Melbourne E. Moon, plaintiff-appellant, pro se.
Harold Borgwald, Asst. Atty. Gen. of New York, New York City (Jacob K, Javits, Atty. Gen. of New York, New York City, and James O. Moore, Jr., Sol. Gen., Buffalo, N. Y., on the brief), for defendants-appellees.
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and FRANK and LUMBARD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have not found it possible to ascertain just what the plaintiff's grievance here is, although he seems to be asking damages from the State of New York and the County of Ontario for some impx'oper judicial actioxx against him. But of course it is too clear for dispute that the State of New York has not consented to be sued or waived its immunity from legal action in any such way, and there is no ground of fedex'al jurisdiction upon which the United States courts may act.
Affirmed.