Case Name: Kurt G. SCHLEGEL, Assignee of Piedmont Building and Development Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, NA, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-12-17
Citations: 258 F. App'x 543
Docket Number: No. 07-1765
Parties: Kurt G. SCHLEGEL, Assignee of Piedmont Building and Development Corporation, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, NA, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 258
Pages: 543–544

Head Matter:
Kurt G. SCHLEGEL, Assignee of Piedmont Building and Development Corporation, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, NA, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 07-1765.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dec. 13, 2007.
Decided: Dec. 17, 2007.
Kurt G. Schlegel, Appellant Pro Se. Megan Conway Rahman, Troutman & Sanders, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Kurt G. Schlegel appeals the district court's orders dismissing his civil conspiracy complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Schlegel v. Bank of America, NA, 505 F.Supp.2d 321 (W.D.Va. 2007); No. 3:07-cv-00022-nkm, 2007 WL 2126358 (July 23, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.