Case Name: PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, BUREAU OF LIQUOR CONTROL ENFORCEMENT, Petitioner v. JET-SET RESTAURANT, LLC, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2017-09-13
Citations: 171 A.3d 1282
Docket Number: No. 327 MAL 2017
Parties: PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, BUREAU OF LIQUOR CONTROL ENFORCEMENT, Petitioner v. JET-SET RESTAURANT, LLC, Respondent
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 171
Pages: 1282–1283

Head Matter:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, BUREAU OF LIQUOR CONTROL ENFORCEMENT, Petitioner v. JET-SET RESTAURANT, LLC, Respondent
No. 327 MAL 2017
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
September 13, 2017

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 13th day of September, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. The isjsue, restated for clarity is:
Does the definition of "frequenting" set forth in Appeal of Speranza, 416 Pa. 348, 206 A.2d 292 (1965) still apply to Section 4-493(14) of the Liquor Code, or do the 2003 Amendments to the Code demonstrate the General Assembly's in tent that a minor may not be inside a licensed premises even a single time unless one of the exceptions enumerated in Section 4-493(14) applies?
Allowance of appeal is DENIED as to all remaining issues.