Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jose Lopez, Also Known as Angel Lopez, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1994-09-30
Citations: 207 A.D.2d 1017
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Lopez, Also Known as Angel Lopez, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 207
Pages: 1017–1018

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Lopez, Also Known as Angel Lopez, Appellant.
[617 NYS2d 73]

Opinion:
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention that the jury verdict convicting defendant of petit larceny is not supported by legally sufficient evidence. Defendant observed the perpetrator committing a larceny and assisted him in completing it (see, People v Robin son, 60 NY2d 982, 984). The jury could reasonably infer that, by reason of his conduct, defendant had the requisite intent to commit a larceny (see, People v Farmer, 156 AD2d 1003, 1004, lv denied 75 NY2d 868). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Mark, J.—Petit Larceny.) Present— Pine, J. P., Lawton, Fallon, Davis and Boehm, JJ.