Case Name: SUN STUDS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ATA EQUIPMENT LEASING, INC., Applied Theory, Inc. and U.S. Natural Resources, Inc., Defendants/Cross-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1989-12-20
Citations: 892 F.2d 73
Docket Number: Nos. 87-1509, 87-1515
Parties: SUN STUDS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ATA EQUIPMENT LEASING, INC., Applied Theory, Inc. and U.S. Natural Resources, Inc., Defendants/Cross-Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 892
Pages: 73–73

Head Matter:
SUN STUDS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ATA EQUIPMENT LEASING, INC., Applied Theory, Inc. and U.S. Natural Resources, Inc., Defendants/Cross-Appellants.
Nos. 87-1509, 87-1515.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Dec. 20, 1989.
Don H. Marmaduke, of Tonkon, Torp, Galen, Marmaduke & Booth, Portland, Or., for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Barbee B. Lyon, of Tonkon, Torp, Galen, Marmaduke & Booth, Portland, Or., and William A. Birdwell, of Spears, Lubersky, Campbell, Bledsoe, Anderson & Young, Portland, Or.
David W. Axelrod, of Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, Portland, Or., for defendants/eross-appellants. With him on the brief was Robert L. Harrington, of Portland, Or.

Opinion:
ORDER
Upon further consideration of the suggestion for rehearing in banc that was accepted on August 16,1989, 882 F.2d 1583, it now appearing that the acceptance was improvident,
IT IS ORDERED that the suggestion for rehearing in banc be, and the same hereby is, declined. The court's opinion issued on March 31, 1989, appearing at 872 F.2d 978, as modified by order on July 3, 1989, 872 F.2d 994, is reinstated.