Case Name: THE HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, Plaintiff, v. PINSKI BROS., INC., a corporation, Rainbow Electric Co., a corporation, Sletten Construction Company, a corporation, First National Insurance Company of America, a corporation, and KENNETH K. KNIGHT and A. ANDREW VAN TEYLINGER, co-partners, doing business as Knight & van Teylingen (movants and applicants), Defendants
Court: Montana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Montana
Decision Date: 1970-05-01
Citations: 155 Mont. 534
Docket Number: No. 11869
Parties: THE HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, Plaintiff, v. PINSKI BROS., INC., a corporation, Rainbow Electric Co., a corporation, Sletten Construction Company, a corporation, First National Insurance Company of America, a corporation, and KENNETH K. KNIGHT and A. ANDREW VAN TEYLINGER, co-partners, doing business as Knight & van Teylingen (movants and applicants), Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Montana Reports
Volume: 155
Pages: 534–535

Head Matter:
THE HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, Plaintiff, v. PINSKI BROS., INC., a corporation, Rainbow Electric Co., a corporation, Sletten Construction Company, a corporation, First National Insurance Company of America, a corporation, and KENNETH K. KNIGHT and A. ANDREW VAN TEYLINGER, co-partners, doing business as Knight & van Teylingen (movants and applicants), Defendants.
No. 11869.
Decided May 1, 1970.
468 P.2d 763.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Kenneth K. Knight and A. Andrew van Teylingen, co-partners, doing business as Knight & van Teylingen, and Kenneth K. Knight having moved and applied to this Court for certain orders under a motion and application entitled "Affidavit, Motion to Stay, and Application for Writ of Supervisory Control (or other Appropriate Relief) Staying District Court Proceedings Herein until Determination of Appeal, and for Order Directing Plaintiff and the DISTRICT Court to Appear and Participate in Appeal Proceedings Involving Identical Pacts, Issues and Matters," and the Court having heard argument ex parte and having taken the matter under advisement and given consideration to the contentions of the movants and being now advised in the premises.
It is ordered that the relief sought be denied, without prejudice.