Case Name: Jack J. SCHWARTZ, Appellant, v. CUSTOM PRINTING COMPANY, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-01-04
Citations: 24 S.W.3d 718
Docket Number: No. ED 75814
Parties: Jack J. SCHWARTZ, Appellant, v. CUSTOM PRINTING COMPANY, Respondent.
Judges: Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 24
Pages: 718–719

Head Matter:
Jack J. SCHWARTZ, Appellant, v. CUSTOM PRINTING COMPANY, Respondent.
No. ED 75814.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Jan. 4, 2000.
James J. Wilson, Patricia A. Hageman, St Louis, for appellant.
Stephen L. Beimdiek, Lashly & Baer, P.C., St. Louis, for respondent.
Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant Jack J. Schwartz appeals from a judgment entered against him and in favor of Respondent Custom Printing Co. in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and record on appeal and conclude that an extended opinion would serve no precedential or jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided the parties with a memorandum opinion for their exclusive use detailing the reasons for this decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).