Case Name: POLYTECH, INC., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. RABBITT, PITZER & SNODGRASS, P.C., Defendants/Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-02-08
Citations: 14 S.W.3d 187
Docket Number: No. ED 76446
Parties: POLYTECH, INC., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. RABBITT, PITZER & SNODGRASS, P.C., Defendants/Respondents.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., J. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 14
Pages: 187–187

Head Matter:
POLYTECH, INC., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. RABBITT, PITZER & SNODGRASS, P.C., Defendants/Respondents.
No. ED 76446
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Feb. 8, 2000.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 14, 2000.
Application for Transfer Denied April 25, 2000.
Isidore I. Lamke, Washington, for appellant.
Gerard T. Noce, Hilary R. Huffman, St. Louis, for respondents.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., J. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff appeals from the trial court's judgment dismissing with prejudice plaintiffs' malpractice action. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).