Case Name: Curtis Kendall PERNELL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2006-09-01
Citations: 937 So. 2d 234
Docket Number: No. 3D06-1521
Parties: Curtis Kendall PERNELL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before GERSTEN, GREEN, and SUAREZ, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 937
Pages: 234–234

Head Matter:
Curtis Kendall PERNELL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D06-1521.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Sept. 1, 2006.
Curtis Kendall Pernell, in proper person.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, for appellee.
Before GERSTEN, GREEN, and SUAREZ, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The defendant appeals the trial court's denial of his motion for post conviction relief claiming newly discovered evidence. We affirm because the defendant's claim regarding gain time has been previously litigated, Pernell v. State, 855 So.2d 66 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), is untimely, and does not qualify as newly discovered evidence. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850; Blanco v. State, 702 So.2d 1250 (Fla.1997).
Affirmed.