Case Name: Kerr et ux. v. Hofer (et al., Appellant)
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1941-01-31
Citations: 341 Pa. 47
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 23
Parties: Kerr et ux. v. Hofer (et al., Appellant).
Judges: Before Schaffer, C. J., Maxey, Drew, Linn, Stern, Patterson and Parker, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 341
Pages: 47–48

Head Matter:
Kerr et ux. v. Hofer (et al., Appellant).
Submitted January 20,1941.
Before Schaffer, C. J., Maxey, Drew, Linn, Stern, Patterson and Parker, JJ.
John E. Cupp, John B. Cupp and Clyde E. Williamson, for appellant.
John C. Youngman, for appellee.
January 31, 1941:

Opinion:
Per Curiam,
It is contended by appellant that the court below abused its discretion and acted in an arbitrary manner in granting two new trials in this case. In its opinion following the last trial, the court states, "the interests of right and justice require that this case should be retried." We will not interfere with the action of the trial court under such circumstances: Reese v. Pittsburgh Rys. Co., 336 Pa. 299, 9 A. 2d 394.
Order affirmed.