Case Name: Anthony Leon HOOVER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER; Todd L. Burke, Judge; Elizabeth Toomes; Pansy D. Glantor, Assistant District Attorney; Clyde Southern, Jr., Probation Officer, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-05-18
Citations: 131 F. App'x 925
Docket Number: No. 05-6106
Parties: Anthony Leon HOOVER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER; Todd L. Burke, Judge; Elizabeth Toomes; Pansy D. Glantor, Assistant District Attorney; Clyde Southern, Jr., Probation Officer, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 131
Pages: 925–926

Head Matter:
Anthony Leon HOOVER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER; Todd L. Burke, Judge; Elizabeth Toomes; Pansy D. Glantor, Assistant District Attorney; Clyde Southern, Jr., Probation Officer, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 05-6106.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 12, 2005.
Decided: May 18, 2005.
Anthony Leon Hoover, Appellant pro se.
Before TRAXLER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Leon Hoover seeks to appeal the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation and dismissing his complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. See Hoover v. Office of the Public Defender, No. CA-04-862 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 4, 2005). We also deny Hoover's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED