Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos TORRES, Defendant-Appellant; United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos Torres, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-01-09
Citations: 309 F. App'x 94
Docket Number: Nos. 07-10167, 07-10234
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos TORRES, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos Torres, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 309
Pages: 94–95

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos TORRES, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos Torres, Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 07-10167, 07-10234.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 17, 2008.
Filed Jan. 9, 2009.
Angela M. Martinez, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Evo A. Deconcini U.S. Courthouse, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Jeffrey D. Bartolino, Esq., Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: GOODWIN, TROTT, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
In these consolidated appeals, Carlos Torres appeals from the 288-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for interference with commerce by robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951(a), (b)(1), and brandishing a firearm during a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)®, and from the district court's denial of his motion to correct the sentence under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35. We dismiss.
Torres contends that the appeal waiver in his plea agreement is not enforceable. We conclude that the waiver was knowing and voluntary, see United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182-84 (9th Cir.2000), and that the waiver precludes our review of Torres's remaining contentions, see United States v. Bibler, 495 F.3d 621, 623-24 (9th Cir.2007). Accordingly, we dismiss Torres's appeal of his sentence and his appeal from the denial of his Rule 35 motion.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.