Case Name: William G. BISBY, Employee/Claimant, v. LABOR READY CENTRAL, INC., Employer/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-03-06
Citations: 360 S.W.3d 914
Docket Number: No. ED 97108
Parties: William G. BISBY, Employee/Claimant, v. LABOR READY CENTRAL, INC., Employer/Respondent.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 360
Pages: 914–914

Head Matter:
William G. BISBY, Employee/Claimant, v. LABOR READY CENTRAL, INC., Employer/Respondent.
No. ED 97108.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
March 6, 2012.
William Bisby, Omaha, NE, pro se.
E. Thomas Liese, Holtkamp, Liese, Schultz, & Hilliker, PC, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
William G. Bisby appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying compensation. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value or serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).