Case Name: Noah SMITH, Appellant, v. RECONDITIONED APPLIANCES, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2017-10-17
Citations: 530 S.W.3d 613
Docket Number: ED 105433
Parties: Noah SMITH, Appellant, v. RECONDITIONED APPLIANCES, Respondent.
Judges: Before Lisa P. Page, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 530
Pages: 613–613

Head Matter:
Noah SMITH, Appellant, v. RECONDITIONED APPLIANCES, Respondent.
ED 105433
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Filed: October 17, 2017
Noah Smith, 3431 Pestalozzi Street, St. Louis, MO 63118, pro se.
Reconditioned Appliances, c/o Bill Johnson, 701 N. Belt W, Swansea, IL 62226, pro se.
Before Lisa P. Page, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
After a bench trial, Noah Smith appeals the judgment in his favor awarding $500 in damages against Reconditioned Appliances. Appellant contests the trial court erred by: (I) improperly applying the wrong measure of damages; (II) failing to award consequential and incidental damages; (III) failing to find Respondent liable for the damage allegedly caused by Respondent; and (IV) failing to submit his cause to a jury. We affirm.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).