Case Name: TEXAS OSAGE COOPERATIVE ROYALTY POOL, et al., Petitioners, v. Van CLARK, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Texas
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1959-02-18
Citations: 322 S.W.2d 506
Docket Number: No. A-6957
Parties: TEXAS OSAGE COOPERATIVE ROYALTY POOL, et al., Petitioners, v. Van CLARK, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 322
Pages: 506–507

Head Matter:
TEXAS OSAGE COOPERATIVE ROYALTY POOL, et al., Petitioners, v. Van CLARK, Respondent.
No. A-6957.
Supreme Court of Texas.
Feb. 18, 1959.
Rehearing Denied April 15, 1959.
House, Mercer & House, San Antonio, for petitioners.
Boone & Kirby, Littlefield, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals in this case is found in Tex.Civ.App., 314 S.W.2d 109.
In its opinion the Court of Civil Appeals has held that the quoted language contained in the deed from Emil Zoch and wife, Lydia Zoch, to T. Fred Evins, et al., trustees, dated September 9, 1930 (314 S.W.2d 111), under which petitioners claim title did not give respondent, Van Clark, notice of petitioners' claim of title to an interest in the minerals in the Southeast Quarter (SE1/4) of Section No. 42 in Block 1, R. M. Thompson original grantee. We are not satisfied that the opinion in that respect has correctly declared the law. We are satisfied, however, that the application for writ of error filed herein presents no error which requires reversal of the judgment of the Court o-f Civil Appeals. Accordingly, the application for writ of error is "Refused. No Reversible Error." Rule 483, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.