Case Name: FLUORO ELECTRIC CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. SMITH TRANSPORT LIMITED, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1960-05-09
Citations: 32 N.J. 277
Docket Number: 
Parties: FLUORO ELECTRIC CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. SMITH TRANSPORT LIMITED, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 32
Pages: 277–277

Head Matter:
FLUORO ELECTRIC CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. SMITH TRANSPORT LIMITED, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Argued April 25, 1960
Decided May 9, 1960.
Mr. Jerome S. Lieb argued the cause for the defendant-appellant (Messrs. Earlcavy & Lieb, attorneys).
Mr. Arthur Slavitt argued the cause for the plaintiff-respondent.

Opinion:
Pee Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Conford in the court below.
Burling, J., concurring in result.
For affirmance—Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Burling, Jacobs, Prancis, Proctor, Hall and Schettino—7.
For reversal—Hone.