Case Name: Buster Boy Suit Co., Inc., Appellant, v. Abraham Geller, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1942-12-30
Citations: 265 A.D. 965
Docket Number: 
Parties: Buster Boy Suit Co., Inc., Appellant, v. Abraham Geller, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 265
Pages: 965–966

Head Matter:
Buster Boy Suit Co., Inc., Appellant, v. Abraham Geller, Respondent.

Opinion:
It was proper to deny the motion because the defense may stand for what it is worth. It would appear that the proof may show that section 234, Debtor and Creditor Law (Cons. Laws, eh. 12), is applicable. The adequacy of the separate defense, therefore, whether complete or partial, will have to be tested in the light of the proof adduced. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.