Case Name: WHITEHORN v. BUSBY
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1925-09-15
Citations: 113 Okla. 116
Docket Number: No. 16408
Parties: WHITEHORN v. BUSBY.
Judges: 
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 113
Pages: 116–117

Head Matter:
WHITEHORN v. BUSBY.
No. 16408
Opinion Filed Sept. 15, 1925.
Sturgell & Cornett, for plaintiff in error.
T. L. Brown and Phil. AV. Davis, Jr., for defendant in error.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This case is appealed from the district court of Tulsa county, and defendant in error moves the court to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that she had no notice of time and place case-made would be presented to the trial judge for settlement and signature. On the 13th day of April, 1925, notice .was served on counsel for defendant in error that on the 20th day of April, 1925, plaintiffs in error would present ease-made to the trial judge for signature and settlement. Case-made was not presented on this day, but was presented on the 8th day of May, 1925 without any further notice, and was settled and signed on this day.
Case-made not having been presented on April 20, 1925, and no further notice having been given or waived, the signing and settling of the same on May 8, 1925, is a nullity and confers upon this court no jurisdiction to review the case on appeal. Baker & Lockwood Mfg. Co. v. Voorhees et al., 63 Okla. 283, 165 Pac. 125.
The appeal is dismissed.