Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MICHAEL LEE HOBSON, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1992-05-27
Citations: 113 Or. App. 253
Docket Number: 881411M, 900557M; CA A71391, CA A71392
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MICHAEL LEE HOBSON, Appellant.
Judges: Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Joseph, Chief Judge, and Edmonds, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 113
Pages: 253–254

Head Matter:
Submitted on record and briefs April 27,
convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing May 27, 1992
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MICHAEL LEE HOBSON, Appellant.
(881411M, 900557M; CA A71391 (Control), CA A71392)
(Cases Consolidated)
831 P2d 722
Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, and James N. Varner, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, filed the brief for appellant.
Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Janie M. Burcart, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Joseph, Chief Judge, and Edmonds, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant was found guilty of public indecency. ORS 163.465. The trial court suspended imposition of sentence and placed him on probation for 5 years. In addition to the general conditions of probation, the court imposed several special conditions, including a requirement that defendant pay up to $10,000 for counseling costs for the victim.
The state concedes that the trial court erred in imposing restitution. There was no showing that defendant was able to pay restitution, and no specific amount of restitution was set by the court. Moreover, the victim did not appear at the sentencing and, without her testimony, there is insufficient evidence of a causal connection between defendant's offense and the need for counseling. We accept the concession.
Conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing.