Case Name: Berry et al. vs. Turner, et al Executors
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1886-04-06
Citations: 1 Ga. L. Rep. 373
Docket Number: 
Parties: Berry et al. vs. Turner, et al Executors.
Judges: 
Reporter: Georgia Law Reporter
Volume: 1
Pages: 373–373

Head Matter:
Decisions Rendered April 6, 1886.
Berry et al. vs. Turner, et al Executors.
Complaint foe Land, from Hancock. Res Adjudieata. Equitable Pleadings. Words and Phrases. Decrees. New Trial. (Before Judge Lumpkin.)
Seaborn Tieese; J. T. Jordan, for plaintiffs in error.
C. W. DuBose; James A. Harley, for defendants.

Opinion:
Jackson, C. J.
1. Under equitable pleadings in an ejectment case, one issue being what amount the defendants were indebted to the plain- tiffs on account of money for necessaries furnished to the former, and oír a former hearing in this court it having been held that the court, un;der an equitable plea, would justify "expenditures reasonably neees-sary for her (one of the defendants) and her children,'' such'reasonable necessaries, including plantation tools, and food for hands and stock on a pdantation where she and her family were supported, and a recovery •therefor, was properly sustained. Berry et al, and Turner et al, (February Term. 1885, pam. p. 2S.)
2 No error in the decree appears, but were the decree wrong, it •would furnish no ground of a motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.