Case Name: ALBERT LIFSON & SONS, INCORPORATED, APPELLANT, v. NICHOLAS MELLO, RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1928-05-14
Citations: 104 N.J.L. 662
Docket Number: 
Parties: ALBERT LIFSON & SONS, INCORPORATED, APPELLANT, v. NICHOLAS MELLO, RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 104
Pages: 662–663

Head Matter:
ALBERT LIFSON & SONS, INCORPORATED, APPELLANT, v. NICHOLAS MELLO, RESPONDENT.
Submitted February 17, 1928
Decided May 14, 1928.
For the appellant, Stamler & Koestler.
For the respondent, Salvatore F. LaOorte.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchaed, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Lloyd, White, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.