Case Name: STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Daniel David WHITE, Defendant-Appellant.
Court: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2018-11-07
Citations: 431 P.3d 104
Docket Number: A159685
Parties: STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Daniel David WHITE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and DeVore, Judge, and James, Judge.
Reporter: Pacific Reporter 3d
Volume: 431
Pages: 104–104

Head Matter:
STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Daniel David WHITE, Defendant-Appellant.
A159685
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
November 7, 2018
Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Laura A. Frikert, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, for petition.
Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Patrick M. Ebbett, Assistant Attorney General, for response.
Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and DeVore, Judge, and James, Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant petitions for reconsideration of our opinion in State v. White , 293 Or. App. 62, 426 P.3d 203 (2018), on the ground that footnote 2 of that decision inaccurately describes defendant's position with regard to arguments that were not raised in his supplemental briefing. We agree in part and replace that footnote with the following: "We confine our discussion to the probative value of the evidence with respect to delayed reporting, and we reject defendant's remaining contentions without discussion."
Reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified and adhered to as modified.