Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. William Edward CLAY, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2010-11-16
Citations: 326 S.W.3d 511
Docket Number: No. ED 94010
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. William Edward CLAY, Appellant.
Judges: Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 326
Pages: 511–511

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. William Edward CLAY, Appellant.
No. ED 94010.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Nov. 16, 2010.
Jessica Hathaway, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Richard A. Starnes, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant William Clay appeals the trial court's judgment and sentence after a jury convicted him of first-degree burglary.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).