Case Name: Cunningham v. Kitchen, Appellant
Court: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1935-11-13
Citations: 119 Pa. Super. 382
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 193
Parties: Cunningham v. Kitchen, Appellant.
Judges: Before Kellee, P. J., Baldrige, Stadtfeld, Paekee, James and Bhodes, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania Superior Court Reports
Volume: 119
Pages: 382–385

Head Matter:
Cunningham v. Kitchen, Appellant.
Argued October 21, 1935.
Before Kellee, P. J., Baldrige, Stadtfeld, Paekee, James and Bhodes, JJ.
John P. Vallilee, of Bchrier & Vallilee, for appellant.
B. Nathaniel Richter, for appellee.
November 13, 1935;

Opinion:
Per Curiam,
The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of President Judge Culver. The statement in the opinion that "It was too late [for the defendant], to declare the forfeiture after plaintiff had tendered him the full amount due him in accordance with his demands," is sustained by the language used by Mr. Justice Kephart in the case of White Co. to use, etc. v. Union Transfer Co., 270 Pa. 514, 517, 113 A. 432.