Case Name: Matter of Application of Michael T. Daly, as Commissioner of Public Works of the City of New York, etc., under Chapter 189 of the Laws of 1893 to Acquire Certain Real Estate, etc.
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1895-12-27
Citations: 98 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 641
Docket Number: 
Parties: Matter of Application of Michael T. Daly, as Commissioner of Public Works of the City of New York, etc., under Chapter 189 of the Laws of 1893 to Acquire Certain Real Estate, etc.
Judges: Brown, P. J., concurred; Dykman, J., not sitting.
Reporter: Supreme Court Reports (Hun)
Volume: 98
Pages: 641–641

Head Matter:
Matter of Application of Michael T. Daly, as Commissioner of Public Works of the City of New York, etc., under Chapter 189 of the Laws of 1893 to Acquire Certain Real Estate, etc.

Opinion:
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.—
Pratt, J.:
This is an appeal from an order made at Special Term involving the allowance made attorneys of record in this proceeding. The statute authorizing and regulating the proceeding provides that u such allowance for counsel fees as may be made by order of the court shall be final, etc." It is plain that the commissioners had no authority to fix any allowance, but the power was vested in the court. It was, therefore, a matter of discretion to be fixed in view of all the circumstances. The sum allowed did not exceed the limit prescribed by section 3255 of the Code of Civil Procedure and was not an abuse of the discretion vested in the judge presiding at Special Term. The case involved much labor and responsibility and required great care and much time in its management; in addition, new duties were imposed upon the attorneys subsequent to the hearing before the court upon the first presentation of the commissioners' report. The proceeding involved the taking of 113 parcels of land, and the awards exceeded ¡$150,000, and the time required was over two years. During all this time the case called for constant attention. Under all the facts and circumstances we cannot say the amount allowed was unreasonable. Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements.
Brown, P. J., concurred; Dykman, J., not sitting.