Case Name: Vitaliano E. NAPOLES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1985-06-04
Citations: 470 So. 2d 72
Docket Number: No. 84-653
Parties: Vitaliano E. NAPOLES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before HENDRY, HUBBART and FERGUSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 470
Pages: 72–73

Head Matter:
Vitaliano E. NAPOLES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 84-653.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
June 4, 1985.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Rory S. Stein, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Randi Klay-man Lazarus, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.
Before HENDRY, HUBBART and FERGUSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Although we find no error in the trial court's revocation of the defendant's probation herein, we conclude that the sentence thereafter imposed contains a technical error in that credit was not given for a specific period of time spent by the defendant in the county jail before sentence was imposed, as required by Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1983). The revocation of probation and sentence under review are affirmed, except for this technical error, and the cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to modify the sentence in compliance with the above statute. The defendant need not be present in court for this correction of sentence. Pruitt v. State, 363 So.2d 611 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978); James v. State, 364 So.2d 729 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977).
Affirmed as modified and remanded.