Case Name: Rakesh N. PATEL, Petitioner/Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE FOR the STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-01-06
Citations: 125 S.W.3d 333
Docket Number: No. ED 82400
Parties: Rakesh N. PATEL, Petitioner/Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE FOR the STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 125
Pages: 333–334

Head Matter:
Rakesh N. PATEL, Petitioner/Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE FOR the STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 82400.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Jan. 6, 2004.
Carl M. Ward, Clayton, MO, for appellant.
Kevin A. Nelson, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Rakesh N. Patel appeals the trial court's judgment upholding the Director of Revenue's suspension of his driver's license pursuant to Section 302.505 RSMo (2001 Supp.). We find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).