Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Harold Dwight WOOTEN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-05-08
Citations: 473 F. App'x 213
Docket Number: No. 11-7225
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Harold Dwight WOOTEN, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 473
Pages: 213–213

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Harold Dwight WOOTEN, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 11-7225.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 26, 2012.
Decided: May 8, 2012.
Michael A. Grace, Sr., Christopher R. Clifton, Grace, Tisdale & Clifton, P.A., Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellant. Ripley Rand, United States Attorney, Robert M. Hamilton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before KING, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Harold Dwight Wooten appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion by the district court. See United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir.2004) (providing review standard). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Wooten, No. 1:98-cr-00094-JAB-1 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 30, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.