Case Name: Louise C. CARVER, Appellant, v. Jane A. PEARSON and James Pearson, her husband, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1986-09-09
Citations: 493 So. 2d 545
Docket Number: No. 86-353
Parties: Louise C. CARVER, Appellant, v. Jane A. PEARSON and James Pearson, her husband, Appellees.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 493
Pages: 545–545

Head Matter:
Louise C. CARVER, Appellant, v. Jane A. PEARSON and James Pearson, her husband, Appellees.
No. 86-353.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Sept. 9, 1986.
Spencer & Taylor and Dean A. Mitchell, Miami, for appellant.
High, Stack, Lazenby, Palahack & Laca-sa and Glen R. Goldsmith, Coral Gables, for appellees.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The order under review granting the plaintiffs a new trial on the ground that the jury verdict was contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence does not represent an abuse of discretion and is therefore affirmed. Ford Motor Co. v. Kikis, 401 So.2d 1341 (Fla.1981); Cloud v. Fallis, 110 So.2d 669 (Fla.1959).