Case Name: Anthony DOVE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Imelda J. PATE, Assistant District Attorney-Lenoir County; Paul L. Jones, Resident Superior Court Judge-Lenoir County; Ripley E. Rand, U.S. Attorney-Middle District of N.C.; Dawn G. Stroud, Lenoir County Clerk of Court; Linda McGee, Chief Judge, NC Court of Appeals; Sam J. Ervin, Justice, NC Supreme Court, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-06-01
Citations: 651 F. App'x 188
Docket Number: No. 16-6223
Parties: Anthony DOVE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Imelda J. PATE, Assistant District Attorney—Lenoir County; Paul L. Jones, Resident Superior Court Judge—Lenoir County; Ripley E. Rand, U.S. Attorney—Middle District of N.C.; Dawn G. Stroud, Lenoir County Clerk of Court; Linda McGee, Chief Judge, NC Court of Appeals; Sam J. Ervin, Justice, NC Supreme Court, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 651
Pages: 188–189

Head Matter:
Anthony DOVE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Imelda J. PATE, Assistant District Attorney—Lenoir County; Paul L. Jones, Resident Superior Court Judge—Lenoir County; Ripley E. Rand, U.S. Attorney—Middle District of N.C.; Dawn G. Stroud, Lenoir County Clerk of Court; Linda McGee, Chief Judge, NC Court of Appeals; Sam J. Ervin, Justice, NC Supreme Court, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-6223
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 26, 2016
Decided: June 1, 2016
Anthony Dove, Appellant Pro Se.
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Dove appeals the district court's orders dismissing, after a 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (2012) review, his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2012) action, and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's orders. Dove v. Pate, No. 5:15-ct-03132-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 12, 2016 & Feb. 2, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED