Case Name: BLEVINS, etc. v. WARDEN OF MARYLAND HOUSE OF CORRECTION
Court: Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jurisdiction: Maryland
Decision Date: 1960-07-05
Citations: 223 Md. 645
Docket Number: P. C. No. 110
Parties: BLEVINS, etc. v. WARDEN OF MARYLAND HOUSE OF CORRECTION
Judges: 
Reporter: Maryland Reports
Volume: 223
Pages: 645–647

Head Matter:
BLEVINS, etc. v. WARDEN OF MARYLAND HOUSE OF CORRECTION
[P. C. No. 110,
September Term, 1959.]
Decided July 5, 1960.
Before Bruñe, C. J., and Henderson, Hammond, Prescott and Horney, JJ.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The Warden's motion to dismiss this application for leave to appeal from a denial of relief under the Post Conviction Procedure Act must be granted. The application was denied by the Criminal Court of Baltimore on December 29, 1959, and an application for leave to appeal would have had to have been filed within thirty days or by January 28, 1960, under Code (1959 Supp.), Art. 27, Sec. 645I. The applicant's request for appeal, which appears to be in his handwriting, was dated January 30, 1960, and was not received by the Clerk of the Criminal Court until February 4, 1960.
If the application for appeal could be considered, it would be of no avail to the applicant. Judge Sodaro correctly found that his complaints of illegal search, denial of a jury trial, denial of postponement of trial, receiving a more severe sentence than his co-defendants, and perjury (of witnesses against him were directed to the regularity of the trial and not to the jurisdiction of the court, and that "[t]he alleged errors are of matters which were incident to the trial, and for which remedies were available before and during the original trial, or by review on motion for a new trial, or on appeal to the Court of Appeals, and have no merit under the Post Conviction Procedure Act."
Applicant's contention that he was denied a copy of the transcript of the testimony at his original trial was rejected on his petition for habeas corpus by Judge Shure in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County on August 6, 1959, and, as Judge Sodaro held, was not a ground available to him in the post conviction proceedings.
Application dismissed.