Case Name: HOLLAND PAVING CO., Inc., a Florida corporation, Petitioner, v. James A. DANN, Individually, and James A. Dann as the Administrator of the Estate of James Arthur Dann, Jr., Deceased, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1965-05-19
Citations: 175 So. 2d 780
Docket Number: No. 34096
Parties: HOLLAND PAVING CO., Inc., a Florida corporation, Petitioner, v. James A. DANN, Individually, and James A. Dann as the Administrator of the Estate of James Arthur Dann, Jr., Deceased, Respondent.
Judges: DREW, C. J., and ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., and WILLIS, Circuit Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 175
Pages: 780–780

Head Matter:
HOLLAND PAVING CO., Inc., a Florida corporation, Petitioner, v. James A. DANN, Individually, and James A. Dann as the Administrator of the Estate of James Arthur Dann, Jr., Deceased, Respondent.
No. 34096.
Supreme Court of Florida.
May 19, 1965.
Rehearing Denied June 22, 1965.
I. Stanley Levine and Fred Patrox, Miami, for petitioner.
Wesley A. Fink, Daytona Beach, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we are requested to review a decision of a District Court of Appeal, which allegedly conflicts with prior decisions of this court.
Our initial examination of the petition and record suggested a possible jurisdictional conflict. We issued the writ and have heard arguments on' both jurisdiction and merits.
After a thorough consideration of the petition and record we are now led to conclude that no jurisdictional conflict of decisions is present. Finding, therefore, that the writ was improvidently issued, it is hereby discharged
It is so ordered.
DREW, C. J., and ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., and WILLIS, Circuit Judge, concur.