Case Name: EMMA GROTHENHEN v. FRANCIS D. DUFFIELD
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1927-06-07
Citations: 5 N.J. Misc. 677
Docket Number: 
Parties: EMMA GROTHENHEN v. FRANCIS D. DUFFIELD.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 5
Pages: 677–678

Head Matter:
EMMA GROTHENHEN v. FRANCIS D. DUFFIELD.
Decided June 7, 1927.
Before Justices Pabkek and Campbell.
Eor the rule, Avis & Avis.
Contra, John C. Edmunds.

Opinion:
Memokandum.
The judgment in this case was entered upon a bond and warrant of attorney. The bond was secured by a mortgage which had been foreclosed and the mortgaged lands sold under such proceedings before the action was taken leading up to the judgment now under attack.
Under such circumstances the proceedings are controlled by, 3 Comp. Stat., p. 3423, § 51, and it is apparent that such statute was not followed or complied with.
The rule to show cause must therefore be made absolute and the judgment set aside, with costs.