Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Reginald Dewayne JEFFRIES, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-07-06
Citations: 437 F. App'x 243
Docket Number: No. 11-6157
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Reginald Dewayne JEFFRIES, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 437
Pages: 243–244

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Reginald Dewayne JEFFRIES, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-6157.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 30, 2011.
Decided: July 6, 2011.
Reginald Dewayne Jeffries, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Reginald Dewayne Jeffries seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying his motion to amend his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2010) motion and motion to supplement his motion to amend as well as his subsequent Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The orders Jeffries seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appeal-able interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.