Case Name: PHINEAS D. CLAYTON, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al., Respondents
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1933-05-05
Citations: 131 Cal. App. 619
Docket Number: Civ. No. 9107
Parties: PHINEAS D. CLAYTON, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports
Volume: 131
Pages: 619–619

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 9107.
First Appellate District, Division One.
May 5, 1933.]
PHINEAS D. CLAYTON, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al., Respondents.
J. E. White and Abraham Setzer for Petitioner.

Opinion:
THE COURT.
The petition for an alternative writ of prohibition is denied.
The respondent court had jurisdiction to hear and determine the motion to dissolve petitioner's attachment (Truck Owners & Shippers, Inc., v. Superior Court, 194 Cal. 146 [228 Pac. 19]), and this power did not depend upon the correctness of the decision (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 1102; Dahlgren v. Superior Court, 8 Cal. App. 622 [97 Pac. 681] ; People v. San Diego, 71 Cal. App. 421 [236 Pac. 377]).