Case Name: Lucien B. Ferry et al., Respondents, v. Henry Bange, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1889-05-13
Citations: 1 Silv. Sup. 377
Docket Number: 
Parties: Lucien B. Ferry et al., Respondents, v. Henry Bange, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Silvernail's Supreme Court Reports
Volume: 1
Pages: 377–377

Head Matter:
Lucien B. Ferry et al., Respondents, v. Henry Bange, Appellant.
N. Y. Supreme Court, Second Department, General Term,
May 13, 1889.
Deceiver. Appointment.—The appointment of a receiver by the county judge of Kings county, where the judgment was entered in the superior court of the city of New York and a transcript thereof filed in the county clerk’s office of Kings county, is regular, and a motion to vacate his appointment is properly denied.
H. M. Whitehead, for appellant.
N. Merrill and William C. Holbrook, for William Palen, receiver.

Opinion:
Dykman, J.
—This is an appeal from an order of the county judge of Kings county, denying a motion to vacate an order-appointing a receiver in proceedings supplementary to execution, and remove his bond from the files of the county clerk and vacate all his proceedings.
The motion was made by the judgment-debtor, and the order which he desires to annul was made in October, 1862, after his appointment, and in the year 1863, the receiver commenced an action against the judgment-debtor and Ezra. L. Bushnell, for the recovery of property alleged to have-been transferred by the judgment-debtor in fraud of creditors, which has been tried before a referee, who found all the facts in favor of the receiver, and among other things found in favor of his appointment, that is that he was regularly appointed as such receiver.
Our conclusion also is that the appointment of the receiver was regular, and that the motion for his removal was properly denied.
The order appealed from should be • affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.