Case Name: Nathaniel Agosta HINDS, Appellant v. Fich BACANMORE, et al., Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-10-15
Citations: 398 F. App'x 604
Docket Number: No. 10-5157
Parties: Nathaniel Agosta HINDS, Appellant v. Fich BACANMORE, et al., Appellees.
Judges: BEFORE: SENTELLE, Chief Judge; and ROGERS and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 398
Pages: 604–605

Head Matter:
Nathaniel Agosta HINDS, Appellant v. Fich BACANMORE, et al., Appellees.
No. 10-5157.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Oct. 15, 2010.
Nathaniel Agosta Hinds, Washington, DC, pro se.
R. Craig Lawrence, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Washington, DC, for Appellees.
BEFORE: SENTELLE, Chief Judge; and ROGERS and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by the appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's order dismissing appellant's complaint without prejudice be affirmed. The district court correctly determined it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over that complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1331, 1332.
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.