Case Name: McGRATH et al. v. RUDOLPH WURLITZER CO.
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1911-01-05
Citations: 126 N.Y.S. 1137
Docket Number: 
Parties: McGRATH et al. v. RUDOLPH WURLITZER CO.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 126
Pages: 1137–1137

Head Matter:
McGRATH et al. v. RUDOLPH WURLITZER CO.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
¡January 5, 1911.)
Appeal from Municipal ¡Court, Borough of Manhattan, Second District. Action by Thomas J. McGrath and another (against the Rudolph Wurlitzer Company. From 'a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, defendant appeals. Reversed.
Kramer & Bourke, for appellant.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
It is impossible to see from 1 this"" record how the trial court arrived at the 'judgment rendered or what disposition was ¡made of the defendant's counterclaim. It is also clear that improper evidence was admitted ,on the question of damages. The judgment must therefore be reversed, and a new- trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.