Case Name: Daniel A. MANCUSO, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MISSOURI, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-03-14
Citations: 895 S.W.2d 261
Docket Number: No. 65386
Parties: Daniel A. MANCUSO, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MISSOURI, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before GRIMM, C.J., and REINHARD and CARL R. GAERTNER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 895
Pages: 261–261

Head Matter:
Daniel A. MANCUSO, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MISSOURI, Defendant/Appellant.
No. 65386.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
March 14, 1995.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., James A. Chenault, III, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Mo. Dept, of Revenue, Jefferson City, for appellant.
Clifford Schwartz, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before GRIMM, C.J., and REINHARD and CARL R. GAERTNER, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Director of Revenue appeals the trial court's judgment which sustained driver's petition to review license revocation. This appeal is governed by our supreme court's decision in Jackson v. Director of Revenue, 893 S.W.2d 831 (Mo. banc 1995).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).