Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eleazar Cortes GUERRERO, a/k/a Cat, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-05-26
Citations: 604 F. App'x 291
Docket Number: No. 15-6111
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eleazar Cortes GUERRERO, a/k/a Cat, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 604
Pages: 291–292

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eleazar Cortes GUERRERO, a/k/a Cat, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-6111.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 21, 2015.
Decided: May 26, 2015.
Eleazar Cortes Guerrero, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, William Glenn Perry, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Eleazar Cortes Guerrero appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We review the district court's decision for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Munn, 595 F.3d 183, 186 (4th Cir.2010). We do not find any abuse of discretion as the record justifies the district court's decision not to reduce Guerrero's sentence, as it properly considered Guerrero's post-sentencing conduct pursuant to U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 1B1.10, cmt. n. l(B)(iii) (2014).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.