Case Name: Jenean McBREARTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CENTRAL TEXAS COLLEGE; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-06-23
Citations: 101 F. App'x 733
Docket Number: No. 03-35854; D.C. No. CV-02-05249-FDB
Parties: Jenean McBREARTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CENTRAL TEXAS COLLEGE; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before LEAVY, THOMAS, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 101
Pages: 733–734

Head Matter:
Jenean McBREARTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CENTRAL TEXAS COLLEGE; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 03-35854.
D.C. No. CV-02-05249-FDB.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 15, 2004.
Decided June 23, 2004.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Franklin D. Burgess, District Judge, Presiding.
Jenean McBrearty, Des Moines, IA, pro se.
Jerret E. Sale, Esq., Deborah L. Carstens, Esq., Bullivant Houser Bailey, PC, Seattle, WA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before LEAVY, THOMAS, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Jenean McBrearty appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendants in her employment discrimination action alleging violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act ("ADEA"), 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Washington state laws. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, and we affirm because McBrearty did not raise any genuine issues of material fact which would allow her to proceed on any of her claims. See Vazquez v. County of L.A., 349 F.3d 634, 639-640 (9th Cir.2003).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.