Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Michael Rawlings, Also Known as Michael Rolands, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1991-01-03
Citations: 169 A.D.2d 399
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Rawlings, Also Known as Michael Rolands, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 169
Pages: 399–399

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Rawlings, Also Known as Michael Rolands, Appellant.

Opinion:
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jerome Hornblass, J.), rendered October 30, 1987, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the third degree and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an indeterminate prison term of from 3Vi to 7 years, unanimously affirmed.
In this prosecution for the burglary of a restaurant, the only issue raised concerns the court's charge to the jury with respect to the requirement that guilt be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Aside from possible failure to properly preserve the precise point made on appeal, we have held that a charge defining a reasonable doubt as a doubt for which a jury can "give a reason" is not erroneous (People v Santiago, 164 AD2d 824).
In any event, since there was overwhelming proof of the defendant's guilt, the error, if any, would be considered harmless. (People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230, 237.) Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.