Case Name: KARL OFFER et al., Appellants, v. MABEL V. McMILLAN et al., Respondents
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1951-01-23
Citations: 101 Cal. App. 2d 840
Docket Number: Civ. No. 7920
Parties: KARL OFFER et al., Appellants, v. MABEL V. McMILLAN et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports, Second Series
Volume: 101
Pages: 840–841

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 7920.
Third Dist.
Jan. 23, 1951.]
KARL OFFER et al., Appellants, v. MABEL V. McMILLAN et al., Respondents.
Darold D. De Coe and Norman R. Samuelsen for Appellants.
Wilke & Fleury for Respondents.

Opinion:
DEIRUP, J. pro tem.
The plaintiffs have appealed error. There is no basis for a discussion of this point, for we cannot take the opinion into account. "The findings and conclusions constitute the final decision of the court and an oral or written opinion cannot be resorted to for the purpose of impeaching or gainsaying the findings and judgment." (Buckhantz v. R. G. Hamilton & Co., 71 Cal.App.2d 777, 781 [163 P.2d 756].)
The judgment is affirmed. Appeal from order denying new trial dismissed.
Adams, P. J., and Peek, J., concurred.