Case Name: GUARDIAN MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COBY ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, and Nintendo of America, Inc., Defendant-Cross Appellant, and Overstock.com, Inc., Defendant-Appellee, and Dell, Inc., Defendant-Appellee, and Lite-On Americas, Inc. and Lite-On Sales & Distribution, Inc., Defendants-Appellees, and Sherwood America, Inc., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-12-18
Citations: 358 F. App'x 169
Docket Number: Nos. 2009-1577, 2009-1578
Parties: GUARDIAN MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COBY ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, and Nintendo of America, Inc., Defendant-Cross Appellant, and Overstock.com, Inc., Defendant-Appellee, and Dell, Inc., Defendant-Appellee, and Lite-On Americas, Inc. and Lite-On Sales & Distribution, Inc., Defendants-Appellees, and Sherwood America, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 358
Pages: 169–169

Head Matter:
GUARDIAN MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COBY ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, and Nintendo of America, Inc., Defendant-Cross Appellant, and Overstock.com, Inc., Defendant-Appellee, and Dell, Inc., Defendant-Appellee, and Lite-On Americas, Inc. and Lite-On Sales & Distribution, Inc., Defendants-Appellees, and Sherwood America, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.
Nos. 2009-1577, 2009-1578.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Dec. 18, 2009.
Sharon A. Israel, Mayer Brown, LLP, Christopher A. Shield, Bracewell & Giuliani, LLP, Houston, TX, Robert M. Dato, Buchalter Nemer, Irvine, CA, William S. Coats, White & Case LLP, Palo Alto, CA, Grant E. Kinsel, Foley & Lardner LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Brent N. Bumgardner, Nelson Bumgardner Casto, P.C., Forth Worth, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Opinion:
ORDER
Upon consideration of the joint motion to dismiss these appeals,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) The motion is granted.
(2) Any other pending motions are denied as moot.
(3) Each side shall bear its own costs.