Case Name: DYCK-O'NEAL, INC., Appellant, v. Alice CISLO, Appellee.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2019-02-05
Citations: 262 So. 3d 882
Docket Number: No. 1D17-2151
Parties: DYCK-O'NEAL, INC., Appellant,
v.
Alice CISLO, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 262
Pages: 882–883

Head Matter:
DYCK-O'NEAL, INC., Appellant,
v.
Alice CISLO, Appellee.
No. 1D17-2151
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
February 5, 2019
Susan B. Morrison, of Law Offices of Susan B. Morrison, P.A., and David M. Snyder, of David M. Snyder, and Joshua D. Moore, of Law Offices of Daniel C. Consuegra, Tampa, for Appellant.
James Dale Gibson, of Gibson, Kohl, Wolff & Hric, P.L., Sarasota, for Appellee.
ON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The Florida Supreme Court has quashed the decision in this case and remanded with instructions that we reconsider the matter in light of its decision in Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. Lanham , 257 So.3d 1 (Fla. 2018). In compliance with the Florida Supreme Court's directive, we reverse the trial court's dismissal order and remand this case for determination on the merits of Dyck-O'Neal's deficiency claim.
REVERSED and REMANDED .
B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Lewis and Makar, JJ., concur.