Case Name: Dontez Lamont SIMUEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Boyd BENNETT; Roby C. Lee; Michael S. Hamden; Lieutenant Monroe; Marshall A. Hudson; J. Phillip Griffin, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-02-26
Citations: 88 F. App'x 635
Docket Number: No. 03-7833
Parties: Dontez Lamont SIMUEL, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Boyd BENNETT; Roby C. Lee; Michael S. Hamden; Lieutenant Monroe; Marshall A. Hudson; J. Phillip Griffin, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 88
Pages: 635–635

Head Matter:
Dontez Lamont SIMUEL, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Boyd BENNETT; Roby C. Lee; Michael S. Hamden; Lieutenant Monroe; Marshall A. Hudson; J. Phillip Griffin, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 03-7833.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 19, 2004.
Decided Feb. 26, 2004.
Dontez Lamont Simuel, Appellant pro se.
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Dontez Lamont Simuel appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), 1915A(b) (2000), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Simuel v. Bennett, No. CA-03-557-5-F (E.D.N.C. filed Aug. 15, 2003 & entered Aug. 18, 2003; filed Oct. 29, 2003 & entered Oct. 30, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED