Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Rudy Hassen, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2006-02-07
Citations: 26 A.D.3d 176
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rudy Hassen, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 26
Pages: 176–177

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rudy Hassen, Appellant.
[810 NYS2d 139]

Opinion:
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (John Cataldo, J.), rendered October 27, 2003, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of six years to life, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant is not entitled, pursuant to the amelioration doctrine of People v Behlog (74 NY2d 237 [1989]), to the benefit of the reduced penalty contained in the Drug Law Reform Act (L 2004, ch 738), because the Legislature has expressly stated that the provision upon which defendant relies applies only to crimes committed after its effective date (People v Nelson, 21 AD3d 861 [2005]). In any event, the amelioration doctrine does not apply where, as here, a defendant was sentenced before the new law's effective date (People v Walker, 81 NY2d 661, 666-667 [1993]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Friedman, Catterson and Malone, JJ.