Case Name: The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Blankenship, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1996-02-14
Citations: 74 Ohio St. 3d 522
Docket Number: No. 95-1923
Parties: The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Blankenship, Appellant.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 74
Pages: 522–523

Head Matter:
The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Blankenship, Appellant.
[Cite as State v. Blankenship (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 522.]
(No. 95-1923
Submitted November 14, 1995
Decided February 14, 1996.)
John F. Holcomb, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, and Richard A. Hyde, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
Darryl J. Blankenship, pro se.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We affirm the court of appeals for the reasons stated in its entry.
Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.