Case Name: Louis S. Cohen and Lena Kranz, Respondents, v. The Williamsburgh Savings Bank, Defendant, Impleaded with Carlo Rossa, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1909-12
Citations: 135 A.D. 910
Docket Number: 
Parties: Louis S. Cohen and Lena Kranz, Respondents, v. The Williamsburgh Savings Bank, Defendant, Impleaded with Carlo Rossa, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 135
Pages: 910–910

Head Matter:
Louis S. Cohen and Lena Kranz, Respondents, v. The Williamsburgh Savings Bank, Defendant, Impleaded with Carlo Rossa, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment entered on the 7th day of May, 1909, after a trial at the Hew York Trial Term before the court without a jury.

Opinion:
Per Curiam :
The judgment appealed from should be modified by striking out the provision that the. plaintiffs "have judgment against the defendant Carlo Rossa for the sum of §614.67 now held by the defendant, the Williams-burgh Savings Bank, with §83.78 costs, making a total of §698.45and by striking out the further clause in the judgment, "that the defendant, the Williamsburgh Savings Bank have judgment against the plaintiffs dismissing the complaint upon the merits with §55 dollars costs as taxed ; " and as so modified that the j udgment be affirmed, without costs. Present — Ingraham, McLaughlin, Clarke, Houghton and Scott, JJ. Judgment modified as stated in opinion, and as modified affirmed, without costs. Settle order on notice.