Case Name: UNITED STATES ex rel. KWAMI.; Abdul-Bey, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tyler C. RAGNOW; John W. Blum; Ronald L. Burniske; Gary E. Royse; Dallas L. England; Everett L. Gull, Jr.; James B. Lonergan; John Doe, # 1-99, in their individual capacities as agents of Chartway Federal Credit Union; Credit Union Financial Services, Incorporated, a Virginia Corporation; Chartway Financial Services, LLC, d/b/a Chartway Federal Credit Union, a Virginia Corporation, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-07-27
Citations: 328 F. App'x 871
Docket Number: No. 09-1385
Parties: UNITED STATES ex rel. KWAMI.; Abdul-Bey, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Tyler C. RAGNOW; John W. Blum; Ronald L. Burniske; Gary E. Royse; Dallas L. England; Everett L. Gull, Jr.; James B. Lonergan; John Doe, # 1-99, in their individual capacities as agents of Chartway Federal Credit Union; Credit Union Financial Services, Incorporated, a Virginia Corporation; Chartway Financial Services, LLC, d/b/a Chartway Federal Credit Union, a Virginia Corporation, Defendants.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 328
Pages: 871–872

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES ex rel. KWAMI.; Abdul-Bey, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Tyler C. RAGNOW; John W. Blum; Ronald L. Burniske; Gary E. Royse; Dallas L. England; Everett L. Gull, Jr.; James B. Lonergan; John Doe, # 1-99, in their individual capacities as agents of Chartway Federal Credit Union; Credit Union Financial Services, Incorporated, a Virginia Corporation; Chartway Financial Services, LLC, d/b/a Chartway Federal Credit Union, a Virginia Corporation, Defendants.
No. 09-1385.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 23, 2009.
Decided: July 27, 2009.
Kwami.; Abdul-Bey, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kwami.; Abdul-Bey appeals the district court's orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action for failure to state a claim and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Abdul-Bey v. Ragnow, No. 2:09-cv-00011-MSD-JEB (E.D. Va. Feb. 9, 2009; Mar. 12, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.