Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darryl Glen RILEY, a/k/a Kendu, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-03-21
Citations: 419 F. App'x 308
Docket Number: No. 10-6974
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darryl Glen RILEY, a/k/a Kendu, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 419
Pages: 308–308

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darryl Glen RILEY, a/k/a Kendu, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-6974.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 25, 2011.
Decided: March 21, 2011.
Michael S. Nachmanoff, Federal Public Defender, Amy L. Austin, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Neil H. MacBride, United States Attorney, Richard D. Cooke, John S. Davis, Assistant United States Attorneys, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Darryl Glen Riley appeals the district court's order denying his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(e)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Riley's motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Riley, No. 3:98-cr-00101-RLW-1 (E.D. Va. June 24, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.