Case Name: MARY A. O'BRIEN, PROSECUTOR, v. ALBERT A. FREY AND LOUIS F. BUTTNER, ESQUIRE, RECORDER OF THE BOROUGH OF KEANSBURG, COUNTY OF MONMOUTH, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, RESPONDENTS
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1926-05-11
Citations: 4 N.J. Misc. 477
Docket Number: 
Parties: MARY A. O’BRIEN, PROSECUTOR, v. ALBERT A. FREY AND LOUIS F. BUTTNER, ESQUIRE, RECORDER OF THE BOROUGH OF KEANSBURG, COUNTY OF MONMOUTH, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 4
Pages: 477–477

Head Matter:
MARY A. O’BRIEN, PROSECUTOR, v. ALBERT A. FREY AND LOUIS F. BUTTNER, ESQUIRE, RECORDER OF THE BOROUGH OF KEANSBURG, COUNTY OF MONMOUTH, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, RESPONDENTS.
Argued January 22, 1926
Decided May 11, 1926.
Before Justices Tbenoitard and Katzenbach.
Eor the prosecutor, Kwrkus & Karlcus.
Eor the respondents, Leo J. Warwick.

Opinion:
Per Cubiam:.
Our examination of the affidavits discloses that there is presented by the applicant for consideration a fqirly debatable question, and, accordingly, the writ of certiorari will be allowed.