Case Name: BOLLETTIERI RESORT VILLAS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Petitioner, v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, Etc., Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2017-10-12
Citations: 228 So. 3d 72
Docket Number: No. SC16-1680
Parties: BOLLETTIERI RESORT VILLAS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Petitioner, v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, Etc., Respondent.
Judges: LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANADY, and POLSTON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 228
Pages: 72–75

Head Matter:
BOLLETTIERI RESORT VILLAS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Petitioner, v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, Etc., Respondent.
No. SC16-1680
Supreme Court of Florida.
[October 12, 2017]
Shawn G. Brown of Frazier & Brown Law, PLLC, Tampa, Florida, for Petitioner
Nancy M. Wallace of Akerman LLP, Tallahassee, Florida, William P. Heller of Akerman LLP, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, Celia C. Falzone of Akerman LLP, Jacksonville, Florida, and Paul W. Ettori of Akerman LLP, Orlando, Florida, for Respondent
Dennis A. Donet of Law Office of Dennis A. Donet, P.A., Miami, Florida, for Amicus Curiae Enrique Arevalo

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Bollettieri Resort Villas Condominium Ass'n, Inc. v. Bank of New York Mellon, 198 So.3d 1140 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016), review granted, No. SC16-1680, 2016 WL 9454216 (Fla. 2016), pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4), of the Florida Constitution. After further consideration of the subsequent opinion of the Fifth District Court of Appeal in Klebanoff v. Bank of New York Mellon, 228 So.3d 167, 2017 WL 2818078 (Fla. 5th DCA June 30, 2017), and the more recent cases from the Fourth District Court of Appeal in Kebreau v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC, 225 So.3d 255, 256, 2017 WL 2983999, at *1 (Fla. 4th DCA July 12, 2017), and the First District Court of Appeal in Forero v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC, 223 So.3d 440, 445 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017), we have determined that the certified conflict has been resolved, and we conclude that we should exercise our discretion and decline review. Accordingly, this case is hereby dismissed.
It is so ordered.
LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANADY, and POLSTON, JJ., concur.
LAWSON, J., concurs specially with an opinion.
LEWIS, J., concurs in result.