Case Name: Carmen Facundo RAMIREZ, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-01-20
Citations: 309 F. App'x 194
Docket Number: No. 07-73361
Parties: Carmen Facundo RAMIREZ, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 309
Pages: 194–195

Head Matter:
Carmen Facundo RAMIREZ, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 07-73361.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 13, 2009.
Filed Jan. 20, 2009.
Carmen Facundo Ramirez, Los Angeles, CA, pro se.
OIL, Julie Pfluger, Esquire, John Hogan, Senior Litigation Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, CAC-District Counsel, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, BYBEE, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Carmen Facundo Ramirez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' decision affirming the immigration judge's denial of petitioner's application for cancel lation of removal based on his failure to establish exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his United States citizen child.
We lack jurisdiction to review petitioner's contention that he established the requisite extreme hardship to his qualifying relative because it is a nonreviewable discretionary determination. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.