Case Name: Jack T. KRAUSER, D.M.D., an Individual, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BIOHORIZONS, INC., a Delaware corporation, BioLok International, Inc., a Delaware corporation, BioHorizons Implant Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-11-17
Citations: 622 F. App'x 890
Docket Number: No. 13-11123
Parties: Jack T. KRAUSER, D.M.D., an Individual, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BIOHORIZONS, INC., a Delaware corporation, BioLok International, Inc., a Delaware corporation, BioHorizons Implant Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before MARCUS, JILL PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 622
Pages: 890–891

Head Matter:
Jack T. KRAUSER, D.M.D., an Individual, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BIOHORIZONS, INC., a Delaware corporation, BioLok International, Inc., a Delaware corporation, BioHorizons Implant Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 13-11123.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Nov. 17, 2015.
Ronald M. Gaché, Scott A. Simon, Shapiro Fishman & Gaché, LLP, Boca Raton, FL, Deanna L. Keysor, Michelle K. Ma-rek, Robert W. Unikel, Kaye Scholer, LLP, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Christopher N. Sipes, Bradley Keith Er-vin, Michael N. Kennedy, Joseph Scott St. John, Covington & Burling, LLP, Jeremy D. Cobb, Attorney at Law, Washington, DC, Gary A. Woodfield; Haile Shaw & Pfaffenberger, PA, North Palm Beach, FL, Richard Gervase, Seth R. Goldman, Timur E. Slonim, Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky & Popeo, PC, New York, N.Y., for Defendants-Appellees.
Before MARCUS, JILL PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Dr. Jack Krauser appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of BioHorizons, Inc., BioLok In ternational, Inc., and BioHorizons Implant Systems, Inc. (collectively, "BioHorizons") in his lawsuit seeking a declaration that he was the owner of the subject matter set forth in a variety of BioHorizons's patents and associated federal registrations regarding dental implant systems. On appeal, Dr. Krauser argues based on an October 1996 agreement that the district court erred in concluding that he had no contractual claim to ownership in the dental implant systems. Upon a thorough review of the briefs and record, and with the benefit of oral argument, we find no error and affirm based on the well-reasoned summary judgment opinion and order of the district court, entered on October 1,2012.
AFFIRMED.