Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wayne JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-11-30
Citations: 155 F. App'x 701
Docket Number: No. 05-7580
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Wayne JOHNSON, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 155
Pages: 701–702

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Wayne JOHNSON, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 05-7580.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 17, 2005.
Decided: Nov. 30, 2005.
Wayne Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Sara Elizabeth Flannery, Stephen David Schiller, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Wayne Johnson appeals the district court's order denying his motion to compel the district court to rule on his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c) (West 2000 & Supp.2005). We have reviewed the record and the district court's order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Johnson, No. CR-99-119 (E.D.Va. Sept. 19, 2005). We deny Johnson's motion to compel discovery from the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
To the extent that Johnson seeks to appeal the district court's order of July 28, 2005, denying his § 3582(c) motion, we note that his notice of appeal was untimely as to this order.