Case Name: Marie Rose BUCKLAND and Robert Buckland, her husband, Appellants, v. CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE and St. Lucie County, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-11-12
Citations: 606 So. 2d 1286
Docket Number: No. 91-2370
Parties: Marie Rose BUCKLAND and Robert Buckland, her husband, Appellants, v. CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE and St. Lucie County, Appellees.
Judges: GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and ANSTEAD and HERSEY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 606
Pages: 1286–1287

Head Matter:
Marie Rose BUCKLAND and Robert Buckland, her husband, Appellants, v. CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE and St. Lucie County, Appellees.
No. 91-2370.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Nov. 12, 1992.
Eric J. Bruning, Goldman, Bruning & Angelos, P.A., Port St. Lucie, for appellants.
Lyman H. Reynolds, Jr. and Leigh E. Lassiter, Roberts & Reynolds, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. We find no error in the trial court's holding that a municipality could not be held legally responsible for any impairment to a driver's view of a stop sign caused by the glare of the setting sun. See Payne v. Broward County, 461 So.2d 63 (Fla.1984).
GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and ANSTEAD and HERSEY, JJ., concur.