Case Name: William H. Silk, Respondent, v. The Bowery Savings Bank and James A. Stenhouse, Appellants, Valden Realty Corporation and Others, Defendants and Appellants Eighty-five Park Avenue Corporation and Conoco Corporation, Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1942-02-27
Citations: 263 A.D. 951
Docket Number: Appeal No. 1; Appeal No. 2
Parties: William H. Silk, Respondent, v. The Bowery Savings Bank and James A. Stenhouse, Appellants, Valden Realty Corporation and Others, Defendants and Appellants Eighty-five Park Avenue Corporation and Conoco Corporation, Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 263
Pages: 951–951

Head Matter:
William H. Silk, Respondent, v. The Bowery Savings Bank and James A. Stenhouse, Appellants, Valden Realty Corporation and Others, Defendants and Appellants Eighty-five Park Avenue Corporation and Conoco Corporation, Defendants.
(Appeal No. 1) (Appeal No. 2),

Opinion:
Order entered December 12, 1941, so far as appealed from, unanimously modified by granting item 1 of the notice of motion, and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant. The date for the examination to proceed to be fixed in the order. No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.