Case Name: Maudrick FREEMAN, Petitioner, v. ACME ROOF DECKS, INC., Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1966-07-27
Citations: 188 So. 2d 801
Docket Number: No. 35372
Parties: Maudrick FREEMAN, Petitioner, v. ACME ROOF DECKS, INC., Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
Judges: THORNAL, C. J., and DREW, O’CON-NELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 188
Pages: 801–801

Head Matter:
Maudrick FREEMAN, Petitioner, v. ACME ROOF DECKS, INC., Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
No. 35372.
Supreme Court of Florida.
July 27, 1966.
Wolfson & Diamond, Miami Beach, and Howard L. Silverstein, Miami, for petitioner.
Lally, Miller & Hodges, Miami, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date of 18 March, 1966.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
Petition for attorney's fees also is denied.
THORNAL, C. J., and DREW, O'CON-NELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.