Case Name: BAIN v. STUDIO DESIGNED HOMES, Inc, et
Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1934-01-08
Citations: 16 Ohio Law Abs. 158
Docket Number: No 4428
Parties: BAIN v STUDIO DESIGNED HOMES, Inc, et
Judges: HAMILTON, PJ, and CUSHING, J, concur.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 16
Pages: 158–159

Head Matter:
BAIN v STUDIO DESIGNED HOMES, Inc, et
Ohio Appeals, 1st Dist, Hamilton Co
No 4428.
Decided Jan 8, 1934
Harold Huber, Cincinnati, for appellant.
Edwin G. Becker, Cincinnati, for appellees.

Opinion:
OPINION
By ROSS, J.
There is no convincing evidence that the company was .insolvent, and no evidence of an intent to defraud creditors. It is claimed that the facts related require this court to infer fraud. We know of no rule or law sustaining such contention.
We are confident that such a state of facts does not present a case, in a court of equity, requiring the application of the provisions of §8818 and 11104 GC, and it is our conclusion that the judgment must be entered in favor of the defendants.
HAMILTON, PJ, and CUSHING, J, concur.