Case Name: MRS. A. D. N. HUNTER, Trustee of the Estate of R. N. HUNTER, Deceased, et al., v. McCLUNG REALTY COMPANY, J. W. McCLUNG, and J. W. McCLUNG, JR.
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 1936-04-29
Citations: 210 N.C. 91
Docket Number: 
Parties: MRS. A. D. N. HUNTER, Trustee of the Estate of R. N. HUNTER, Deceased, et al., v. McCLUNG REALTY COMPANY, J. W. McCLUNG, and J. W. McCLUNG, JR.
Judges: 
Reporter: North Carolina Reports
Volume: 210
Pages: 91–92

Head Matter:
MRS. A. D. N. HUNTER, Trustee of the Estate of R. N. HUNTER, Deceased, et al., v. McCLUNG REALTY COMPANY, J. W. McCLUNG, and J. W. McCLUNG, JR.
(Filed 29 April, 1936.)
Usury B c—
The statutory penalty for usury may not be recovered against' the payee of notes secured by deed of trust upon evidence showing that a certain sum was paid the trustee in the deed of trust, but not paid to or received by the payee of the notes.
Appeal by defendants from Moore, Special Judge, at February Term, 1936, of MecKLENbubu.
No error.
This is an action to recover on notes executed by the defendant Mc-Clung Realty Company, a corporation, and endorsed by the defendants J. W. McClung and J. W. McClung, Jr., and for the foreclosure of the deed of trust by which the said notes are secured. The notes sued on are payable to the order of the Independence Trust Company and Mrs. A. D. N. Hunter, executors of R. N. Hunter, deceased, and are now owned by Mrs. A. D. N. Hunter, trustee of tbe estate of R. N. Hunter, deceased, and tbe Independence Corporation.
At tbe trial tbe defendants admitted tbe execution of tbe notes, as alleged in tbe complaint, and relied upon tbe plea of usury, as alleged in tbeir answer.
Tbe issue submitted to tbe jury was answered as follows:
“In wbat amount, if any, are tbe defendants indebted to tbe plaintiffs ? Answer: ‘$10,000, with interest from 17 March, 1933.’ ”
From judgment in accordance with tbe verdict, tbe defendants appealed to tbe Supreme Court, assigning errors in tbe trial.
Stancill & Davis for plaintiffs.
H. L. Taylor for defendants.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
There was no evidence at the trial of this action tending to show that the payees of the notes sued on received from the defendants interest at a rate in excess of six per centum per annum, or that they charged the defendants interest on said notes at such rate, and thereby became liable for the statutory penalties for usury. C. S., 2306.
All the evidence showed that the sum of $217.50 was paid by the defendants to the Independence Trust Company, and that said sum was not paid to or received by the executors of R. N. Hunter, deceased, to whom the notes are payable.
For that reason, there was no error in the refusal of the court to submit to the jury the issue tendered by the defendants, or in the peremptory charge of the court to the jury on the issue submitted by the court.
The judgment is affirmed.
No error.