Case Name: Pedro MENDEZ, Appellant, v. SHOMA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION and Transportation Casualty, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2005-04-25
Citations: 899 So. 2d 510
Docket Number: No. 1D05-0672
Parties: Pedro MENDEZ, Appellant, v. SHOMA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION and Transportation Casualty, Appellees.
Judges: BARFIELD, ALLEN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 899
Pages: 510–510

Head Matter:
Pedro MENDEZ, Appellant, v. SHOMA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION and Transportation Casualty, Appellees.
No. 1D05-0672.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
April 25, 2005.
Frank J. Taddeo, Coral Gables, for appellant.
No appearance for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Because the order being appealed herein dismisses the petition for benefits without prejudice and contemplates the refiling of the petition or the filing of a motion for entry of a final order, we dismiss this appeal as being taken from a nonfinal, nonappealable order. See generally Croes v. University Community Hospital, 886 So.2d 1040 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Zito v. Jeff Harding, Inc., 870 So.2d 964 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). We likewise decline appellant's request that we undertake certiorari review of the order, since appellant has failed to demonstrate that the remedy afforded by appeal from a final order will be inadequate.
BARFIELD, ALLEN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.