Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Daniel H. CHALLSTROM, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-07-25
Citations: 196 S.W.3d 671
Docket Number: No. WD 65687
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Daniel H. CHALLSTROM, Appellant.
Judges: Before JOSEPH M. ELLIS, P.J., ROBERT G. ULRICH, and RONALD R. HOLLIGER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 196
Pages: 671–671

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Daniel H. CHALLSTROM, Appellant.
No. WD 65687.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
July 25, 2006.
Irene C. Earns, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before JOSEPH M. ELLIS, P.J., ROBERT G. ULRICH, and RONALD R. HOLLIGER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Daniel Challstrom appeals his conviction for unlawful use of a weapon, section 571.030. He presents three points on appeal. First, he claims the trial court abused its discretion in excluding a serologist's testimony and report at trial. Second, he claims the trial court erred in overruling his motion for judgment of acquittal and in sentencing him for unlawful use of a weapon. Finally, he claims the trial court abused its discretion in admitting certain photographs into evidence at trial. Mr. Challstrom's points are denied, and the judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25.