Case Name: Ruth M. Mace et al., Appellants, v. Sue B. Pearlman et al., Defendants-Respondents and Third-Party Plaintiffs. Meyers Bros. Parking Systems, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1975-03-25
Citations: 47 A.D.2d 818
Docket Number: 
Parties: Ruth M. Mace et al., Appellants, v Sue B. Pearlman et al., Defendants-Respondents and Third-Party Plaintiffs. Meyers Bros. Parking Systems, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 47
Pages: 818–818

Head Matter:
Ruth M. Mace et al., Appellants, v Sue B. Pearlman et al., Defendants-Respondents and Third-Party Plaintiffs. Meyers Bros. Parking Systems, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered September 16, 1974, unanimously modified, in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of granting the motion of plaintiff-appellant to increase the ad damnum clause of the complaint and otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. No change is made in any of the issues by the granting of this motion. It was timely made on the basis of recently acquired additional information, and the Statute of Limitations on the claim has not run. It would be time wasting to relegate plaintiff to the institution of a new action. Concur — Stevens, J. P., Markewich, Tilzer, Capozzoli and Nunez, JJ.