Case Name: Terry KNIGHT, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-11-21
Citations: 206 S.W.3d 375
Docket Number: No. ED 87903
Parties: Terry KNIGHT, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 206
Pages: 375–376

Head Matter:
Terry KNIGHT, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 87903.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Nov. 21, 2006.
Gwenda Renee’ Robinson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, Karen Louise Kramer, co-counsel, Roger Johnson, co-counsel, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Terry Knight appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his amended Rule 24.035 motion to vacate sentence and set aside guilty plea. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Vernor v. State, 894 S.W.2d 209, 210 (Mo.App. E.D.1995). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2006, unless otherwise indicated.