Case Name: Tinya WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-01-16
Citations: 36 S.W.3d 409
Docket Number: No. ED 77643
Parties: Tinya WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J., CRAHAN and DRAPER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 36
Pages: 409–409

Head Matter:
Tinya WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 77643.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Jan. 16, 2001.
Daniel L. Mohs, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Andrea Mazza Follett, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J., CRAHAN and DRAPER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Tinya Williams ("Movant") appeals the trial court's judgment denying her Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum, for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).