Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MONTE BRUCE BIANCHI, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1992-02-12
Citations: 111 Or. App. 408
Docket Number: C89-05-32780; CA A65872
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MONTE BRUCE BIANCHI, Appellant.
Judges: Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 111
Pages: 408–409

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted December 20, 1991,
probation revocation affirmed; minimum term vacated and remanded for resentencing February 12, 1992
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MONTE BRUCE BIANCHI, Appellant.
(C89-05-32780; CA A65872)
823 P2d 1043
Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.
Janet A. Metcalf, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Attorney General, Salem.
Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
In the probation revocation proceeding, we affirm the revocation. The state concedes that the minimum term imposed is invalid. We accept the concession, vacate the minimum term and remand for resentencing.
Probation revocatipn affirmed; minimum term vacated; remanded for resentencing.