Case Name: STATE OF MONTANA ex rel. CHARLES R. BAINTER, Relator, v. THE DISTRICT COURT of the SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT of the STATE OF MONTANA, in and fot the COUNTY OF PARK, and the HONORABLE JACK D. SHANSTROM, Judge thereof, Respondent; STATE OF MONTANA ex rel. CHARLES R. BAINTER, Relator, v. THE DISTRICT COURT of the SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT of the STATE OF MONTANA, in and for the COUNTY OF SWEET GRASS, and the HONORABLE JACK D. SHANSTROM, Judge thereof, Respondent
Court: Montana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Montana
Decision Date: 1974-10-24
Citations: 165 Mont. 537
Docket Number: No. 12890
Parties: STATE OF MONTANA ex rel. CHARLES R. BAINTER, Relator, v. THE DISTRICT COURT of the SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT of the STATE OF MONTANA, in and fot the COUNTY OF PARK, and the HONORABLE JACK D. SHANSTROM, Judge thereof, Respondent. STATE OF MONTANA ex rel. CHARLES R. BAINTER, Relator, v. THE DISTRICT COURT of the SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT of the STATE OF MONTANA, in and for the COUNTY OF SWEET GRASS, and the HONORABLE JACK D. SHANSTROM, Judge thereof, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Montana Reports
Volume: 165
Pages: 537–538

Head Matter:
STATE OF MONTANA ex rel. CHARLES R. BAINTER, Relator, v. THE DISTRICT COURT of the SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT of the STATE OF MONTANA, in and fot the COUNTY OF PARK, and the HONORABLE JACK D. SHANSTROM, Judge thereof, Respondent. STATE OF MONTANA ex rel. CHARLES R. BAINTER, Relator, v. THE DISTRICT COURT of the SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT of the STATE OF MONTANA, in and for the COUNTY OF SWEET GRASS, and the HONORABLE JACK D. SHANSTROM, Judge thereof, Respondent.
No. 12890.
Decided Oct. 24, 1974.
527 P.2d 577.
Richard J. Andriolo, Bozeman., of Berg, Angel, Andiolo & Moryan, Bozeman, for relator.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
This is an application for an appropriate writ to vacate an. order of the respondent court dated September 12, 1974, which, changed the venue in Cause #3324, now pending in the district, court of Sweet Grass County.
Counsel was heard ex parte and the matter taken under advisement.
The Court now having considered the matter further denies, the relief sought by the relator and this proceeding is ordered, dismissed.