Case Name: THE BEVERLY SEWERAGE AUTHORITY, A PUBLIC BODY CORPORATE AND POLITIC, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE DELANCO SEWERAGE AUTHORITY, A PUBLIC BODY CORPORATE AND POLITIC, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT; WILLIAM McCRUDDEN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE DELANCO SEWERAGE AUTHORITY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1961-12-06
Citations: 70 N.J. Super. 575
Docket Number: 
Parties: THE BEVERLY SEWERAGE AUTHORITY, A PUBLIC BODY CORPORATE AND POLITIC, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE DELANCO SEWERAGE AUTHORITY, A PUBLIC BODY CORPORATE AND POLITIC, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. WILLIAM McCRUDDEN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE DELANCO SEWERAGE AUTHORITY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 70
Pages: 575–575

Head Matter:
THE BEVERLY SEWERAGE AUTHORITY, A PUBLIC BODY CORPORATE AND POLITIC, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE DELANCO SEWERAGE AUTHORITY, A PUBLIC BODY CORPORATE AND POLITIC, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. WILLIAM McCRUDDEN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE DELANCO SEWERAGE AUTHORITY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued November 13, 1961
Decided December 6, 1961.
Before Judges Gaijlkin, Kilkenny and Herbert.
Mr. Daniel A. O’Donnell, Jr., argued the cause for plaintiffs-appellants (Messrs. Bookbinder, Peskin & Markowitz, attorneys for appellant The Beverly Sewerage Authority; Mr. A. Jerome Moore, attorney for appellant William MeCrudden).
Mr. Robert IT. OriscMolo argued the cause for respondent {Messrs. Parker, McOay & Oriscuolo, attorneys).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Schalick in the court below, reported in 65 N. J. Super. 86.