Case Name: Roberto Jose VASQUEZ, etc., et al., Appellants, v. MOTOPORT, U.S.A., INC., etc., et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-03-10
Citations: 593 So. 2d 1237
Docket Number: Nos. 90-1718, 90-2317 and 91-376
Parties: Roberto Jose VASQUEZ, etc., et al., Appellants, v. MOTOPORT, U.S.A., INC., etc., et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 593
Pages: 1237–1238

Head Matter:
Roberto Jose VASQUEZ, etc., et al., Appellants, v. MOTOPORT, U.S.A., INC., etc., et al., Appellees.
Nos. 90-1718, 90-2317 and 91-376.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 10, 1992.
Kaplan & Miller, James C. Blecke, Perse & Ginsberg and Arnold Ginsberg, Brumer, Cohen, Logan, Kandell & Kaufman, Miami, for appellants.
Blackwell & Walker, and James E. Trib-ble and Angela C. Flowers, Miami, Conrad, Scherer & James, and Linda R. Spaulding, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Sakon v. PepsiCo, Inc., 553 So.2d 163 (Fla.1989). Trespalacios v. Valor Corp., 486 So.2d 649 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). Dade County Police Benev. Ass'n, Inc. v. Metropolitan Dade County, 452 So.2d 6 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); review denied, 461 So.2d 114 (Fla.1985). Winfield v. Noe, 426 So.2d 1148 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). Cassisi v. Maytag, 396 So.2d 1140 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).