Case Name: Hill v. Duke et al.
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1913-02-26
Citations: 139 Ga. 508
Docket Number: 
Parties: Hill v. Duke et al.
Judges: All the Justices concur.
Reporter: Georgia Reports
Volume: 139
Pages: 508–508

Head Matter:
Hill v. Duke et al.
February 26, 1913.
Equitable petition. Before Judge Brand. ■ Jackson superior court. October 5, 1911.
J. A. B. Mahaffey, Cobb & Erwin, and John J. Striclclmd, for plaintiff in error.
H. E. Dem, J. S. Ayers, and Thomas J. Shackelford, contra.

Opinion:
Atkinson, J.
1. The charge was substantially correct, and adjusted to the evidence. In-so far as proper, the requests to charge were covered by the general charge.
2. The evidence authorized the verdict) and there was no abuse of discretion in refusing to grant a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.