Case Name: Michael Sussman et al., Appellants, v. Faith A. Sussman et al., as Personal Representatives of the Estate of George F. Dembow, Deceased, Respondents, et al., Defendant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1979-06-05
Citations: 47 N.Y.2d 849
Docket Number: 
Parties: Michael Sussman et al., Appellants, v Faith A. Sussman et al., as Personal Representatives of the Estate of George F. Dembow, Deceased, Respondents, et al., Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 47
Pages: 849–850

Head Matter:
Michael Sussman et al., Appellants, v Faith A. Sussman et al., as Personal Representatives of the Estate of George F. Dembow, Deceased, Respondents, et al., Defendant.
Argued May 1, 1979;
decided June 5, 1979
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Frederick J. Martin and Raymond M. Planell for appellants.
William J. Greer, Otto C. Jaeger and Emery M. Anderson for respondents.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
The document executed on January 20, 1969 by decedent, George F. Dembow, evinces at most an intention to make a future donative transfer of the proceeds of unspecified securities to certain grandchildren, then infants under 21 years of age. Neither the bonds nor their proceeds were ever physically delivered to the custodian of the grandchildren's accounts, and therefore, no gift was effected under the Uniform Gift to Minors Act (see EPTL 7-4.1). Having failed as a gift, the transaction may not on this record be upheld as a trust (see Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v Winthrop, 238 NY 477, 487). Moreover, the alleged trust corpus was not adequately designated or identified (see Brown v Spohr, 180 NY 201, 209).
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg concur in memorandum.
Order affirmed.