Case Name: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CHARLES SAUNDERS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1976-06-21
Citations: 142 N.J. Super. 287
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CHARLES SAUNDERS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 142
Pages: 287–288

Head Matter:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CHARLES SAUNDERS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued June 14, 1976
Decided June 21, 1976.
Before Judges Kole, Ard and Collester.
Mr. Alan Silber argued the cause for the appellant (Mr. Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney; Mr. Robert A. Baime, of counsel).
Mr. Roy B. Greenman, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. Joseph P. Lordi, Prosecutor of Essex County, attorney).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The conviction of defendant is affirmed substantially for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Bedford. Cf. Doe v. Commonwealth's Attorney for City of Richmond, D. C., 403 F. Supp. 1199, aff'd - U. S. -, 96 S. Ct. 1489, 47 L. Ed. 2d 751 (1976).
Affirmed.