Case Name: In the Matter of Leonid V. Duzhansky, Also Known as Leonid Duzhansky, Deceased. Eleanor Gutt, Respondent; Regina Duzhanskja, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2017-08-23
Citations: 153 A.D.3d 819
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Leonid V. Duzhansky, Also Known as Leonid Duzhansky, Deceased. Eleanor Gutt, Respondent; Regina Duzhanskja, Appellant.
Judges: Rivera, J.R, Leventhal, Austin and Christopher, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 153
Pages: 819–819

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Leonid V. Duzhansky, Also Known as Leonid Duzhansky, Deceased. Eleanor Gutt, Respondent; Regina Duzhanskja, Appellant.
[57 NYS3d 905]

Opinion:
In a contested probate proceeding, the objectant Regina Duzhanskja appeals from so much of an order of the Surrogate's Court, Kings County (Lopez Torres, S.), dated August 2, 2016, as denied that branch of her motion which was to expand discovery beyond the time period set forth in 22 NYCRR 207.27 with respect to certain medical records of the decedent.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The applicable Uniform Rules for the Surrogate's Court confines discovery to "a three-year period prior to the date of the propounded instrument and two years thereafter, or to the date of [the] decedent's death, whichever is the shorter period," except upon "the showing of special circumstances" (22 NYCRR 207.27). The determination of whether to expand the time period set forth in that rule is within the discretion of the court (see Matter of Constant, 128 AD3d 419 [2015]).
Here, contrary to the objectant's contention, the Surrogate's Court providently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of her motion which was to expand discovery beyond the time period set forth in 22 NYCRR 207.27 with respect to certain medical records of the decedent. The objectant failed to demonstrate that there were special circumstances warranting expansion of the time period set forth in that rule (see Matter of Wilson, 266 AD2d 164 [1999]).
Rivera, J.R, Leventhal, Austin and Christopher, JJ., concur.