Case Name: IN THE MATTER OF LOUIS J. MILLER, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1958-11-17
Citations: 28 N.J. 217
Docket Number: 
Parties: IN THE MATTER OF LOUIS J. MILLER, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 28
Pages: 217–217

Head Matter:
IN THE MATTER OF LOUIS J. MILLER, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW.
Argued November 3, 1958
Decided November 17, 1958.
Mr. Thomas J. Brogan for the order.
Mr. Joseph MeliTlo for the respondent.

Opinion:
Pee Curiam:.
The respondent freely admits his violation of the Canons of Ethics. The Hudson County Ethics and Grievance Committee unanimously recommended no discipline beyond reprimand. Under the unusual circumstances of this case we concur in the recommendation of the committee and accordingly the respondent is hereby reprimanded.
Guilty and for reprimand—Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Heher, Burling, Jacobs, Eeancis and Proctor—6.
Not guilty—Justice Waoi-ieneeld—1.