Case Name: Howell v. Bowen; and vice versa
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1921-06-17
Citations: 27 Ga. App. 236
Docket Number: 11999, 12086
Parties: Howell v. Bowen; and vice versa.
Judges: Jenkins, P. J., and Bill, J., concur.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 27
Pages: 236–237

Head Matter:
11999, 12086.
Howell v. Bowen; and vice versa.
Decided June 17, 1921.

Opinion:
Stephens, J.
1. The court did not. abuse its discretion in refusing a continuance upon the ground of the defendant's absence from court when the case was called for trial, when it appeared from the evidence that the defendant " could come to court but not without considerable pain," and when it did not appear that such pain would interfere with his management of the ease. Cavender v. Atkins, 2 Ga. App. 173 (58 S. E. 332).
2. No other assignment of error is relied upon.
Judgment affirmed on the main Mil of exceptions; cross-bill of exceptions dismissed.
Jenkins, P. J., and Bill, J., concur.
Distraint; from city court of Blakely — Judge Sheffield. November 18, 1920.
Glessner & Collins, for Howell. A. H. Gray, contra.