Case Name: In the Matter of Supplementary Proceedings: Standard Oil Company of New York, Inc., Respondent, v. Louis Barber and Anthony T. Coccola, Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of " Barber & Coccola," Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1933-12
Citations: 240 A.D. 976
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Supplementary Proceedings: Standard Oil Company of New York, Inc., Respondent, v. Louis Barber and Anthony T. Coccola, Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of “ Barber & Coccola,” Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 240
Pages: 976–976

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Supplementary Proceedings: Standard Oil Company of New York, Inc., Respondent, v. Louis Barber and Anthony T. Coccola, Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of “ Barber & Coccola,” Appellants.

Opinion:
Order granting reargument of motion to punish appellants for contempt, and holding them, upon such reargument, in contempt, reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied. The record does not establish a violation of the order of April 13, 1933, in the disposition of the proceeds of the check received on May 6, 1933. Nothing indicates that that money could have been received at all by the appellants until after the close of the month of April, and it was, therefore, after-acquired property not under the restraint of the order of April thirteenth. (Mandelbaum v. Danziger, 240 App. Div. 860; McGivney v. Childs, 41 Hun, 607; Potter v. Low, 16 How. Pr. 549; Rainsford v. Temple, 3 Misc. 294; Protter v. Lovell, 91 id. 417.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.