Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Ricardo VILLA-TORRES, Defendant- Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-09-23
Citations: 294 F. App'x 325
Docket Number: No. 05-50436
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Ricardo VILLA-TORRES, Defendant— Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 294
Pages: 325–326

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Ricardo VILLA-TORRES, Defendant— Appellant.
No. 05-50436.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 8, 2008.
Filed Sept. 23, 2008.
Becky S. Walker, Esq., Beong-Soo Kim, Esq., Sandy Nunes Leal, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Michael J. Treman, Esq., Attorney at Law, Santa Barbara, CA, for Defendants Appellant.
Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Ricardo Villa-Torres appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 41-month sentence for being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Villa-Torres's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no arguable grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. The appellant has filed pro se supplemental briefs, and the government has filed an answering brief.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is granted, and the conviction and sentence are affirmed.
In accordance with United States v. Rivera-Sanchez, 222 F.3d 1057, 1062 (9th Cir. 2000), we remand the case to the district court with instructions that it delete from the judgment the incorrect reference to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2). See United States v. Herrera-Blanco, 282 F.3d 715, 719 (9th Cir.2000) (remanding sua sponte to delete the reference to § 1326(b)).
AFFIRMED; REMANDED to correct judgment.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.