Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Roy O. Sampsell, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1928-05-01
Citations: 248 N.Y. 157
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Roy O. Sampsell, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 248
Pages: 157–159

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Roy O. Sampsell, Respondent.
(Argued April 4, 1928;
decided May 1, 1928.)
Glenn W. Woodin, District Attorney, for appellant.
Edmund S. Brown and Harold J. Adams for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We hold that the ordinance of the city of Dunkirk (Dunkirk City Ordinances, chap. 5, § 3) is valid, and is not rendered unlawful by Penal Law, section 1985.
We think, however, that the evidence fails to establish that the locomotive was intentionally suffered-to remain standing upon the crossing.
The judgment should be affirmed.
Cabdozo, Ch. J., Pound, Ceane, Andeews, Lehman and Kellogg, JJ., concur; O'Bbien, J., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed.