Case Name: Mary Reid, Respondent, v. Rudolph Harris et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1959-06-16
Citations: 18 Misc. 2d 422
Docket Number: 
Parties: Mary Reid, Respondent, v. Rudolph Harris et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.
Judges: Concur — Pette, Hart and Brown, JJ.
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 18
Pages: 422–422

Head Matter:
Mary Reid, Respondent, v. Rudolph Harris et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,
June 16, 1959.
Thomas J. Flood and Asher Marcus for appellants.
Aaron Greenspan for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The order should be unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and taxable disbursements, with leave to defendants to renew motion, if they be so advised, upon proper papers showing a meritorious defense and reasonable excuse for the occurrence of the default. The affidavit of merits was inadequate.
Concur — Pette, Hart and Brown, JJ.
Order affirmed, etc.