Case Name: JAMES L. MATHEWS et al. v. COMMISSIONERS OF SAMPSON COUNTY et al.
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 1888-02
Citations: 99 N.C. 69
Docket Number: 
Parties: JAMES L. MATHEWS et al. v. COMMISSIONERS OF SAMPSON COUNTY et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: North Carolina Reports
Volume: 99
Pages: 69–70

Head Matter:
JAMES L. MATHEWS et al. v. COMMISSIONERS OF SAMPSON COUNTY et al.
This case is controlled by the principle announced in Railroad v. Lewis and Maee v. Commissioners, ante.
This was an action to restrain the COLLECTION of taxes, heard upon motion for-injunetion -before Philips, X, at Fall Term, 1887, of Sampson Superior Court.
The plaintiffs are .tax payers of Clinton township in the County of Sampson, and they bring this action to restrain and prevent by injunction the collection- of -certain < taxes levied by the defendants, Commissioners of that county, and about to be collected-by the defendant Sheriff thereof* alleged for sundry causes stated in the complaint to be illegal, and to have been illegally levied. A Judge at Chambers granted an injunction pending the action, until the hearing upon the merits, and the defendants having excepted, appealed to this Court.
Messrs W. R. Allen and W. 8. Thompson, for the plaintiffs.
Mr. Geo. Davis, for the defendants.

Opinion:
MerrimoN, J.
It is alleged in the complaint that the taxes complained of, were, for numerous causes stated, levied illegally, but it is not alleged or contended that they were " levied or assessed for an illegal or unauthorized purpose."
Indeed, so far as appears, the purpose was a proper and lawful one. The Court therefore had no authority to grant relief by injunction, as has been expressly decided in the R. & G. Railroad Company v. Lewis, and Mace v. Commissioners, decided at the present term. This case is in all material respects like and must be governed by those cases.
There is error in that the Court granted the injunction.
Let this be certified to the Superior Court, to the end that further proceedings may be had in the action according to law.
Error.