Case Name: SECURITY NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA, Appellant, v. CORPORATE COMPUTER GROUP, INC., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2003-06-13
Citations: 847 So. 2d 573
Docket Number: No. 1D02-4494
Parties: SECURITY NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA, Appellant, v. CORPORATE COMPUTER GROUP, INC., Appellee.
Judges: WEBSTER, PADOVANO and POLSTON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 847
Pages: 573–574

Head Matter:
SECURITY NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA, Appellant, v. CORPORATE COMPUTER GROUP, INC., Appellee.
No. 1D02-4494.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
June 13, 2003.
Julie Ann Sombathy of Isler, Sombathy & Sombathy, P.A., Panama City, for Appellant.
Mitch Dever, Panama City Beach, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant seeks review of a non-final order denying its motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction. Fla. R.App. P. 9.130(a)(3)(C)(i). On its face, appellee's third amended com- plamt (including exhibit) was legally insufficient to plead a basis for personal jurisdiction over appellant because it neither pled the alleged basis for jurisdiction pursuant to the language of section 48.193(1), Florida Statutes (2001), nor alleged facts which, if true, would be sufficient to support jurisdiction. See Venetian Salami Co. v. Parthenais, 554 So.2d 499, 502 (Fla.1989) (citing what is now Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.070(h)). Accordingly, the trial court should have granted appellant's motion to dismiss. Because it did not, we reverse, and remand with directions that it enter an order vacating its prior order and dismissing, as to appellant, appellee's third amended complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction.
REVERSED and REMANDED, with directions.
WEBSTER, PADOVANO and POLSTON, JJ., concur.