Case Name: MANASQUAN RIVER REGIONAL SEWERAGE AUTHORITY, A BODY POLITIC AND CORPORATE OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. OCEAN COUNTY UTILITIES AUTHORITY, A BODY POLITIC AND CORPORATE OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. BOLAND, SAFFIN, GORDON & SAUTTER, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1989-07-06
Citations: 117 N.J. 239
Docket Number: 
Parties: MANASQUAN RIVER REGIONAL SEWERAGE AUTHORITY, A BODY POLITIC AND CORPORATE OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. OCEAN COUNTY UTILITIES AUTHORITY, A BODY POLITIC AND CORPORATE OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. BOLAND, SAFFIN, GORDON & SAUTTER, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 117
Pages: 239–249

Head Matter:
MANASQUAN RIVER REGIONAL SEWERAGE AUTHORITY, A BODY POLITIC AND CORPORATE OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. OCEAN COUNTY UTILITIES AUTHORITY, A BODY POLITIC AND CORPORATE OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. BOLAND, SAFFIN, GORDON & SAUTTER, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT.
Argued January 17, 1989
Decided July 6, 1989.
Charles E. Starkey argued the cause for appellant (Starkey, Kelly, Blaney & White, attorneys).
Richard H. Woods argued the cause for respondent (Hiering, Dupignac & Barnes, attorneys).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The members of the Court being equally divided, the judgment of the Appellate Division, 234 N.J.Super. 530 is affirmed.