Case Name: ROBERT E. WILLIAMS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1969-02-18
Citations: 104 N.J. Super. 403
Docket Number: 
Parties: ROBERT E. WILLIAMS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 104
Pages: 403–404

Head Matter:
ROBERT E. WILLIAMS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued January 20, 1969
Decided February 18, 1969.
Before Judges Coneoed, Kilkenny and Leonard.
Mr. Charles L. Morgan argued the clause for appellant.
Mr. Ralph W. Campbell argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Campbell, Mangini, Foley, Lee and Murphy, attorneys).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment entered herein is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated by Judge Salvest in the Law Division, 99 N. J. Super. 377 (1968).
Additionally, the insurance policy issued by defendant under "Definitions" provides: "Damages— wherever used with respect to coverage A [Bodily Injury Liability] includes damages for care and loss of service," (Emphasis added). This definition clearly establishes that a husband's per quod claim is included in the $25,000 policy limitation "for all damages arising out of bodily injury sustained by one person in any one accident