Case Name: Deviral BAIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1997-03-07
Citations: 691 So. 2d 508
Docket Number: No. 97-330
Parties: Deviral BAIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 691
Pages: 508–509

Head Matter:
Deviral BAIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 97-330.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
March 7, 1997.
Rehearing Denied April 14, 1997.
Deviral Bain, Daytona Beach, Pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.

Opinion:
HARRIS, Judge.
Deviral Bain is before us on his fourth Rule 3.850 motion. He has been consistently unsuccessful thus far and his luck has not changed. We affirm the trial court's denial of his latest effort.
He claims "newly discovered" evidence that the State withheld impeachment evidence from the defense. He contends that this evidence is contained in an internal investigation file involving Officer Williams, who testified against him at trial. The problem with Bain's current position is that the evidence is neither newly discovered nor is it admissible evidence. The information contained in the internal investigation file which is relied on by Bain, with due diligence, should have been discovered earlier. More damaging, however, is the fact that the claimed new evidence would have been inadmissible in any event. See Jackson v. State, 545 So.2d 260 (Fla.1989) (evidence of police officer's department reprimands inadmissible as impeachment evidence as it concerned inadmissible general acts of misconduct; reprimand not a conviction).
AFFIRMED.
DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ., concur.