Case Name: Cohen et al., Appellants, v. A. M. Byers Company et al.
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1950-01-23
Citations: 363 Pa. 618
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 63
Parties: Cohen et al., Appellants, v. A. M. Byers Company et al.
Judges: Before Maxey, C. J., Drew, Linn, Stern and Stearns, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 363
Pages: 618–619

Head Matter:
Cohen et al., Appellants, v. A. M. Byers Company et al.
Argued January 20, 1950.
Before Maxey, C. J., Drew, Linn, Stern and Stearns, JJ.
Alexander Cooper, with him Cooper & Goodman and Aronstam & Karp, for appellants.
William II. Eckert, with him William K. Unvermgt, Milton W. Lamproplos and Smith, Buchanan & Ingersoll, for appellees.
January 23, 1950:

Opinion:
Opinion
per Curiam,
This is an appeal from the decree refusing a motion for a preliminary injunction. This Court said in Murray v. Hill, 359 Pa. 540, 541, 59 A. 2d 877, that: " Our uniform rule is that, on an appeal from a decree which refuses, grants or continues a preliminary injunction, we will look only to see if there were any apparently reasonable grounds for tbe action of the court below, and we will not further consider the merits of the case or pass upon the reasons for or against such action, unless it is plain that no such grounds existed or that the rules of law relied on are palpably wrong or clearly inapplicable.' " (Citing cases.)
In this case there are apparently reasonable grounds for the action of the court below and for this reason the decree is affirmed.
Costs to be paid by the appellants.