Case Name: W. Bruce SAUNDERS v. STINSON CANNING COMPANY
Court: Maine Supreme Judicial Court
Jurisdiction: Maine
Decision Date: 1986-12-22
Citations: 518 A.2d 725
Docket Number: 
Parties: W. Bruce SAUNDERS v. STINSON CANNING COMPANY.
Judges: Before McKUSICK, C.J., and NICHOLS, ROBERTS, WATHEN, GLASSMAN and CLIFFORD, JJ.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 518
Pages: 725–725

Head Matter:
W. Bruce SAUNDERS v. STINSON CANNING COMPANY.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.
Argued Nov. 3, 1986.
Decided Dec. 22, 1986.
John S. Campbell (orally), Law Offices of Richard E. Poulos, Portland, for plaintiff.
Fitzgerald, Conley & Haley, Constance P. O’Neil (orally), Duane D. Fitzgerald, Bath, for defendant.
Before McKUSICK, C.J., and NICHOLS, ROBERTS, WATHEN, GLASSMAN and CLIFFORD, JJ.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
The Plaintiff, W. Bruce Saunders, appeals from a judgment adverse to him in a jury-waived trial in Superior Court (Knox County) in his action for breach of contract against the Defendant, Stinson Canning Company. He alleged, but the Superior Court did not find, that the Defendant had breached its 1977 contract by failing to deliver certain equipment. The Plaintiff had the burden of proving the breach he alleged. The evidence adduced at trial, however, did not compel the trial court to find a breach of his contract by the Defendant.
The entry is:
Judgment affirmed.
All concurring.