Case Name: Darryl Orvett PAYNE-BEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer SWIGER, Sergeant; Officer Lewis, Hearing Officer; L.W. Huffman, Regional Director, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-04-17
Citations: 12 F. App'x 111
Docket Number: No. 00-7699
Parties: Darryl Orvett PAYNE-BEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer SWIGER, Sergeant; Officer Lewis, Hearing Officer; L.W. Huffman, Regional Director, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 12
Pages: 111–111

Head Matter:
Darryl Orvett PAYNE-BEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer SWIGER, Sergeant; Officer Lewis, Hearing Officer; L.W. Huffman, Regional Director, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 00-7699.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 12, 2001.
Decided April 17, 2001.
Darryl Payne-Bey, pro se.
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Darryl Payne-Bey appeals the district court's order dismissing as frivolous his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Payne-Bey v. Swiger, No. CA-00-806-2 (E.D.Va. Nov. 2, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.