Case Name: Maurice WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Henry NORDAN; San Nordan; Mr. Hall, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-08-03
Citations: 140 F. App'x 491
Docket Number: No. 05-6212
Parties: Maurice WHITE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Henry NORDAN; San Nordan; Mr. Hall, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 140
Pages: 491–491

Head Matter:
Maurice WHITE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Henry NORDAN; San Nordan; Mr. Hall, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 05-6212.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 27, 2005.
Decided: Aug. 3, 2005.
Maurice White, Appellant pro se. Henry Nordan, San Nordan, Mr. Hall, Polkton, North Carolina, Appellees pro se.
Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Maurice White appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See White v. Nordan, No. CA-04-612-3 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 21, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED