Case Name: Constance M. KROFT, formerly Constance Meeks McDowell, Appellant, v. Michael Ray McDOWELL, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1994-05-03
Citations: 636 So. 2d 185
Docket Number: No. 93-3103
Parties: Constance M. KROFT, formerly Constance Meeks McDowell, Appellant, v. Michael Ray McDOWELL, Appellee.
Judges: BOOTH, WOLF and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 636
Pages: 185–185

Head Matter:
Constance M. KROFT, formerly Constance Meeks McDowell, Appellant, v. Michael Ray McDOWELL, Appellee.
No. 93-3103.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
May 3, 1994.
Rehearing Denied June 2, 1994.
Joseph R. Boyd and'William H. Branch of Boyd & Branch, Tallahassee; Chriss Walker of Dept, of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Tallahassee, for appellant.
William H. Maness, Tallahassee, for appel-lee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant seeks review of a final order which denied her request for an award of interest which had accrued through the date of the trial court's order determining that appellee was in arrears in his child support obligation in the amount of $10,452.50. Appellant was clearly entitled to interest on each overdue payment from the date it became due until the date of the order determining the amount of the arrearage. E.g., Romans v. Romans, 611 So.2d 92 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Holt v. Holt, 596 So.2d 106 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Applegate v. Applegate, 566 So.2d 865 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Accordingly, we reverse and remand with directions that the trial court award appellant interest on the past-due child support obligations from the date that each became due to the date of its order determining the amount of the ar-rearage.
REVERSED and REMANDED, with directions.
BOOTH, WOLF and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.