Case Name: LENDLE, Respondent, v. ROBINSON et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1900-07-17
Citations: 65 N.Y.S. 1138
Docket Number: 
Parties: LENDLE, Respondent, v. ROBINSON et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 65
Pages: 1138–1138

Head Matter:
LENDLE, Respondent, v. ROBINSON et al., Appellants.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
July 17, 1900.)
Action for damages by Philip Lendle against Francis' H.’ Robinson and others. From a-judgment in, favor of the plaintiff, and an order denying: a .-¡new; trial, defendants appeal. Affirmed. ^William ‘ Blailde, for appellants. Clarence Lexow,,-for, respondent.

Opinion:
O'-BRÍEN,- J"
;The .plaintiff -brpught this ac-
tion- to recover-,.damages ,fa¿ the, loss of the services and.,society of his wife,, .owing to injuries which she sustained! through the.- .alleged negligence of the defendants. The ¡fa.ots-: involved are similar to those presented ' in the actipn brought by Mrs. Lendle to - recover.,for the injuries which, she sustained,' and .in, the-discussion, .of \ that, cáse ;,the', issues,, ai;q, eotisi.dered and, passed ,upop., .¡Thp ,bnly distinction oit, substance, is- in,,the different, amounts'awarded by the. jury, as ,damages. These.bieihg,,sm"alier. in -the> case,,at;',barí .and n,o.,sp.eoia) /stre.ss'being, made,that, if,the,plaintifll.w¿s entitled /to r,e:' cover, they were excessive, wé,.néec( ,nbt' further discuss the subject. For the' reasons, therefore, set- forth in the .opinion,in the .cg.se of' Lendle ,v.' Robinson -(Shp.).,'65,','N. Y.'Stipp.. 894, th,e . judgment '¡herein' is. affirmed, with, costs.,1 All concur.,', , ' 1 : '.'V -