Case Name: IN RE: Appeal of the BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF CHELTENHAM TOWNSHIP from the Decision dated December 16, 2015, of the Zoning Hearing Board of Cheltenham Township Petition of: Board of Commissioners of Cheltenham Township
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2018-01-29
Citations: 179 A.3d 1079
Docket Number: No. 526 MAL 2017
Parties: IN RE: Appeal of the BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF CHELTENHAM TOWNSHIP from the Decision dated December 16, 2015, of the Zoning Hearing Board of Cheltenham Township
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 179
Pages: 1079–1079

Head Matter:
IN RE: Appeal of the BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF CHELTENHAM TOWNSHIP from the Decision dated December 16, 2015, of the Zoning Hearing Board of Cheltenham Township
Petition of: Board of Commissioners of Cheltenham Township
No. 526 MAL 2017
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
January 29, 2018
ORDER

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 29th day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to the remaining issue. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Did the Commonwealth Court overlook the express language of 53 P.S. 10917 by holding that a zoning application for special exception is governed by an ordinance other than the ordinance in effect when the zoning application was filed?