Case Name: ALGONQUIN STEEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. CONNECTICUT COMPRESSED GAS, INC.
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 2000-01-25
Citations: 252 Conn. 112
Docket Number: SC 16101
Parties: ALGONQUIN STEEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. CONNECTICUT COMPRESSED GAS, INC.
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 252
Pages: 112–113

Head Matter:
ALGONQUIN STEEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. CONNECTICUT COMPRESSED GAS, INC.
(SC 16101)
Norcott, Katz, Palmer, Peters and Callahan, Js.
Argued November 30, 1999
officially released January 25, 2000
Theodore R. Tyma, with whom was Stephen F. Donahue, for the appellant (defendant).
Christopher W. Huck, for the appellee (plaintiff).

Opinion:
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
After examining the record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted.
The appeal is dismissed.
We granted 1he defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court limited to the following issue: "Did the Appellate Court properly dismiss the defendant's appeal?" Algonquin Steel Technologies, Inc. v. Connecticut Compressed Gas, Inc., 248 Conn. 919, 734 A.2d 565 (1999).