Case Name: Maurice B. STEWART, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dr. JOUBERT; Dr. Colin Ottey; Correctional Medical Services Inc.; Warden Phillip Morgan; Assistant Warden Harry Murphy; Chief of Security Michael P. Thomas; Dr. Getachew; Nurse Manager Jeanette Simmons; Assistant Warden Richard J. Graham, Jr., Defendants-Appellees, and Warden, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-06-22
Citations: 474 F. App'x 238
Docket Number: No. 12-6247
Parties: Maurice B. STEWART, Jr., Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Dr. JOUBERT; Dr. Colin Ottey; Correctional Medical Services Inc.; Warden Phillip Morgan; Assistant Warden Harry Murphy; Chief of Security Mi chael P. Thomas; Dr. Getachew; Nurse Manager Jeanette Simmons; Assistant Warden Richard J. Graham, Jr., Defendants—Appellees, and Warden, Defendant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 474
Pages: 238–239

Head Matter:
Maurice B. STEWART, Jr., Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Dr. JOUBERT; Dr. Colin Ottey; Correctional Medical Services Inc.; Warden Phillip Morgan; Assistant Warden Harry Murphy; Chief of Security Mi chael P. Thomas; Dr. Getachew; Nurse Manager Jeanette Simmons; Assistant Warden Richard J. Graham, Jr., Defendants—Appellees, and Warden, Defendant.
No. 12-6247.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 14, 2012.
Decided: June 22, 2012.
Maurice B. Stewart, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Philip Melton Andrews, Katrina J. Dennis, Kramon & Graham, PA, Baltimore, Maryland; Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Maurice B. Stewart, Jr. appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Stewart v. Joubert, No. 1:11-cv-00427-JFM, 2012 WL 294910 (D.Md. Jan. 31, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.