Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Carl I. Cohen, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1966-07-07
Citations: 18 N.Y.2d 650
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Carl I. Cohen, Appellant.
Judges: Concur: Judges Van VooRhis, Bueke, Scileppi, Beegan and Keating. Judge Fuld dissents in the following memorandum in which Chief Judge Desmond concurs: I adhere to the views I expressed in People v. Dinan (11 N Y 2d 350, 357) — that evidence should be excluded if obtained by interception of telephone communications in contravention of the Federal Communications Act, and, accordingly, vote to reverse the order appealed from.
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 18
Pages: 650–651

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Carl I. Cohen, Appellant.
Argued June 2, 1966;
decided July 7, 1966.
Eugene Gold for appellant.
Aaron E. Koota, District Attorney {William'I. Siegel of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion:
Order affirmed; no opinion.
Concur: Judges Van VooRhis, Bueke, Scileppi, Beegan and Keating. Judge Fuld dissents in the following memorandum in which Chief Judge Desmond concurs: I adhere to the views I expressed in People v. Dinan (11 N Y 2d 350, 357) — that evidence should be excluded if obtained by interception of telephone communications in contravention of the Federal Communications Act, and, accordingly, vote to reverse the order appealed from.