Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James R. NIBLOCK, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-03-19
Citations: 469 F. App'x 272
Docket Number: No. 11-7456
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James R. NIBLOCK, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 469
Pages: 272–273

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James R. NIBLOCK, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-7456.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 15, 2012.
Decided: March 19, 2012.
James Niblock, Appellant Pro Se. Neil H. MacBride, United States Attorney, Dana James Boente, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James R. Niblock appeals the district court's order denying his motion to dismiss the indictment to which he pled guilty in 2003. The district court denied relief for the reasons stated in its prior orders deny ing Niblock's numerous prior challenges to his conviction and sentence. We have reviewed the record in this case and have determined that the district court properly denied Niblock's motion to dismiss the indictment. We therefore affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.