Case Name: Joseph D. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY and John Nielson, Individually, Defendants Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-08-21
Citations: 17 F. App'x 40
Docket Number: Docket No. 00-9210
Parties: Joseph D. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY and John Nielson, Individually, Defendants Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 17
Pages: 40–41

Head Matter:
Joseph D. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY and John Nielson, Individually, Defendants Appellees.
Docket No. 00-9210.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Aug. 21, 2001.
Joseph D. Armstrong, Rochester, NY, pro se.
Paul J. Yesawich III, Harris Beach LLP, Rochester, NY; Scott D. Piper, on the brief, for appellee.
Present MINER, JACOBS, and CALABRESI, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
SUMMARY ORDER
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be, and it hereby is, AFFIRMED.
Plaintiff, appearing pro se, appeals from a grant of summary judgment in the Unit ed States District Court for the Western District of New York (Telesca, J.) dismissing his claims of race discrimination and retaliation. We affirm for substantially the reasons stated in Judge Telesca's Decision and Order. See Armstrong v. Eastman Kodak Co., 97-CIV-6583 (W.D.N.Y. Aug. 25, 2000).