Case Name: CHARLES H. TAYLOR, Appellant, v. BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., Respondents
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1918-02-18
Citations: 36 Cal. App. 815
Docket Number: Civ. No. 2123
Parties: CHARLES H. TAYLOR, Appellant, v. BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports
Volume: 36
Pages: 815–815

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 2123.
First Appellate District.
February 18, 1918.]
CHARLES H. TAYLOR, Appellant, v. BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., Respondents.
Municipal Corporations—Dismissal op Police Officers—San Francisco Charter.—Judgment affirmed on the authority of MaePhee v. Board of Police Commissioners of the City and County of San Francisco et al., ante, p. 308.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Franklin A. Griffin, Judge.
The facts are identical with those stated in the opinion in the case of MacPhee v. Board of Police Commissioners of the City and County of San Frmcisco et al., ante, p. 308.
Nathan C. Coghlan, E. V. McKenzie, and A. L. O’Grady, for Appellant.
Geo. Lull, City Attorney, and Maurice T. Dooling, Jr., Assistant City Attorney, for Respondents.

Opinion:
BEASLY, J., pro tem.
This ease is identical in all respects with that of MacPhee v. Board of Police Commissioners et al., ante, p. 308, [171 Pac. 1086], and upon the authority of that ease the judgment herein is affirmed.
Lennon, P. J., and Kerrigan, J., concurred.