Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Ricardo CRUZ-PONCE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-10-18
Citations: 145 F. App'x 611
Docket Number: No. 05-30027; D.C. No. CR-03-00246-FVS
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Ricardo CRUZ-PONCE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NELSON, T.G., WARDLAW, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 145
Pages: 611–612

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Ricardo CRUZ-PONCE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-30027.
D.C. No. CR-03-00246-FVS.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 11, 2005.
Decided Oct. 18, 2005.
Pamela Jackson Byerly, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Spokane, WA, for PlaintiffAppellee.
Kimberly Deater, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Spokane, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before NELSON, T.G., WARDLAW, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Juan Ricardo Cruz-Ponce appeals the 77-month sentence imposed following his conviction by guilty plea for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a).
Because appellant was sentenced under mandatory Sentencing Guidelines, we remand for further proceedings consistent with United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez, 419 F.3d 906, 916 (9th Cir.2005) (extending Ameline's limited remand procedure to cases involving non-constitutional error under United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005)).
REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.