Case Name: Anthony BARTILOTTA, Petitioner, v. GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA CO. and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1966-05-04
Citations: 186 So. 2d 513
Docket Number: No. 34927
Parties: Anthony BARTILOTTA, Petitioner, v. GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA CO. and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
Judges: THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 186
Pages: 513–513

Head Matter:
Anthony BARTILOTTA, Petitioner, v. GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA CO. and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
No. 34927.
Supreme Court of Florida.
May 4, 1966.
Eeliearing Denied June 7, 1966.
Richard A. Sicking and Kaplan, Ser & Dorsey, Miami, for petitioner.
Fleming, O’Bryan & Fleming, Scott R. Anselmo, Fort Lauderdale, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date October 27, 1965.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
The petition for attorney's fees is also denied.
THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and ERVIN, JJ., concur.