Case Name: Michael Benarosh, Appellant, v. Louis Brod, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of L. Brod & Company, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1932-04
Citations: 235 A.D. 801
Docket Number: 
Parties: Michael Benarosh, Appellant, v. Louis Brod, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of L. Brod & Company, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 235
Pages: 801–801

Head Matter:
Michael Benarosh, Appellant, v. Louis Brod, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of L. Brod & Company, Respondent.

Opinion:
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, not upon the ground stated at Special Term, but for the reason that it is sufficient that plaintiff was apprised, by the bill of particulars, that defendant alleged an accord and satisfaction of the causes of action set forth in the complaint by the payment of a check for $1,000 on August 3, 1931. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.