Case Name: ANDERSON v. KENOSHA AUTO TRANSP. Inc., et al.
Court: United States District Court for the District of Minnesota
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1946-11-07
Citations: 6 F.R.D. 266
Docket Number: Civ. No. 745
Parties: ANDERSON v. KENOSHA AUTO TRANSP. Inc., et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Rules Decisions
Volume: 6
Pages: 266–266

Head Matter:
ANDERSON v. KENOSHA AUTO TRANSP. Inc., et al.
Civ. No. 745.
District Court, D. Minnesota, Fifth Division.
Nov. 7, 1946.
Meagher & Geer, of Minneapolis, Minn., for plaintiffs.
Freeman and King, of Minneapolis, Minn., and Hunt, Palmer & Hood, of Duluth, Minn., for defendant in support of said motion.
Abbott, MacPherran, Dancer & Montague, and Harry C. Applequist, all of Duluth, Minn., for the said Hilmer Carlson, in opposition to said motion.

Opinion:
DONOVAN, District Judge.
The reasons for the ruling in this case are the same as set forth in the Memorandum in the case of Anderson v. Kenosha Auto Transport, Inc., 6 F.R.D. 265.