Case Name: Pablo COLIN-SILVA, aka: Pedro Gonzalez-Gonzalez, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-10-01
Citations: 347 F. App'x 310
Docket Number: No. 06-75234
Parties: Pablo COLIN-SILVA, aka: Pedro Gonzalez-Gonzalez, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: SILVERMAN, RAWLINSON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 347
Pages: 310–311

Head Matter:
Pablo COLIN-SILVA, aka: Pedro Gonzalez-Gonzalez, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 06-75234.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 14, 2009.
Filed Oct. 1, 2009.
Pablo Colin-Silva, San Diego, CA, pro se.
District Director, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Diego, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Jeffery R. Leist, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: SILVERMAN, RAWLINSON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Pablo Colin-Silva, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge's order denying him adjustment of status under 8 U.S.C. § 1255®. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing de novo questions of law, Singh v. INS, 213 F.3d 1050, 1052 (9th Cir.2000), we deny the petition for review.
The agency properly deemed Colin-Silva inadmissible under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(9)(C)® for unlawful presence after a prior removal and correctly noted that Colin-Silva was ineligible for a waiver under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(9)(C)(ii). The agency therefore properly denied Colin-Silva's application for adjustment of status under 8 U.S.C. § 1255®. See Matter of Briones, 24 I. & N. Dec. 355, 371 (BIA 2007); Gonzales v. Dep't of Homeland Security, 508 F.3d 1227, 1242 (9th Cir.2007).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.