Case Name: Charles W. BOWE, Jr., Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-06-26
Citations: 582 So. 2d 92
Docket Number: No. 90-2179
Parties: Charles W. BOWE, Jr., Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellee.
Judges: SMITH, JOANOS and BARFIELD, JJ„ concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 582
Pages: 92–93

Head Matter:
Charles W. BOWE, Jr., Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellee.
No. 90-2179.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
June 26, 1991.
Charles W. Bowe, Jr., Starke, for appellant.
No appearance for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Bowe appeals an order of the Director of the Division of Administrative Hearings dismissing, under section 120.56(2), Florida Statutes (1989), his petition challenging Department of Corrections rules relating to inmate confinement. A very similar order was reversed and remanded in Bass v. Florida Department of Corrections, 575 So.2d 810 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), involving challenge to the same rules, because appellate review was precluded by the fact that the order was unclear as to the grounds for the dismissal.
In Bass, we relied upon Ramadanovic v. Florida Department of Corrections, 575 So.2d 1333 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), involving challenges to rules relating to inmate access to legal materials, in which we reversed a similar order and remanded for entry of an order stating with specificity grounds warranting dismissal of the petition, or for further proceedings on the petition pursuant to 120.56(2).
Finding this order similarly deficient, we REVERSE and REMAND with the same instructions as in Bass and Ramadanovic. See also Van Poyck v. Department of Corrections, 579 So.2d 346 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Ramadanovic v. Department of Corrections, 579 So.2d 332 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).
SMITH, JOANOS and BARFIELD, JJ" concur.