Case Name: Elmer Eugene MARSHALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1985-01-18
Citations: 463 So. 2d 375
Docket Number: No. 84-489
Parties: Elmer Eugene MARSHALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: OTT, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 463
Pages: 375–375

Head Matter:
Elmer Eugene MARSHALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 84-489.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Jan. 18, 1985.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 20, 1985.
Morris Silberman, Law Offices of Peter M. de Manió, P.A., Sarasota, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Gary 0. Welch, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we find the appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error. We do find error, however, in the assessment of costs against the appellant.
After adjudging the appellant insolvent, the trial court assessed costs against him in the amount of $15 pursuant to section 960.-20, Florida Statutes (1983) (Crimes Compensation Trust Fund), $2 pursuant to section 943.25(4), Florida Statutes (1983) (Law Enforcement Training and Correctional Officer Training Trust Fund), and $2 pursuant to section 943.25(8), Florida Statutes (1983) (Criminal Justice Education and Training Fund). Since appellant was adjudged insolvent but was not given either adequate notice of the assessment, or an opportunity to object to it, we hereby strike the costs. Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984). This decisión is without prejudice to the trial court assessing costs against the appellant in accordance with the requirements of Jenkins.
In all other respects, the judgment and sentence is affirmed.
OTT, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.