Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael WARD, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-09-11
Citations: 194 F. App'x 884
Docket Number: No. 05-16988
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael WARD, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before BLACK, BARKETT and HILL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 194
Pages: 884–884

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael WARD, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-16988
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Sept. 11, 2006.
Anne R. Schultz, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Kathleen M. Williams, Richard C. Klugh, Jr., Michael T. Caruso, Federal Public Defender, Miami, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before BLACK, BARKETT and HILL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Richard C. Klugh, Jr., appointed counsel for Michael Ward in this appeal from Ward's revocation of supervised release, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Ward's revocation and sentence are AFFIRMED.