Case Name: Maury Lee KING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WAL-MART, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-05-22
Citations: 63 F. App'x 719
Docket Number: No. 03-1383
Parties: Maury Lee KING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WAL-MART, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 63
Pages: 719–719

Head Matter:
Maury Lee KING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WAL-MART, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 03-1383.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 15, 2003.
Decided May 22, 2003.
Maury Lee King, Appellant Pro Se.
Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
PER CURIAM.
Maury Lee King appeals from the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his employment discrimination action after King faded to comply with the court's order that he file a copy of his right-to-sue letter. Because King failed to comply with the court's unambiguous order, which expressly warned King of the consequences of failing to comply, we find that the district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing the action. See Ballard v. Carlson, 882 F.2d 93, 95-96 (4th Cir.1989). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.