Case Name: Esther Schwartz, Respondent, v. The Union Central Life Insurance Co., Isidore Fleschner, Charles E. Coolen and Joseph Grossman, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1939-05-23
Citations: 257 A.D. 856
Docket Number: 
Parties: Esther Schwartz, Respondent, v. The Union Central Life Insurance Co., Isidore Fleschner, Charles E. Coolen and Joseph Grossman, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 257
Pages: 856–856

Head Matter:
Esther Schwartz, Respondent, v. The Union Central Life Insurance Co., Isidore Fleschner, Charles E. Coolen and Joseph Grossman, Appellants.

Opinion:
Orders denying the motions of the defendants to dismiss the amended complaint on the ground that it appears on the face thereof that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action affirmed, with one bill of ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to defendants to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.