Case Name: FIRST NAT. BANK OF LONGVIEW, TEXAS, et al. v. STATE BANKING BOARD et al.
Court: Texas Commission of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1928-12-12
Citations: 11 S.W.2d 505
Docket Number: No. 1003-4876
Parties: FIRST NAT. BANK OF LONGVIEW, TEXAS, et al. v. STATE BANKING BOARD et al.
Judges: GREENWOOD and PIERSON, JJ. Opinion of the Commission of Appeals adopted, and mandamus refused.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 11
Pages: 505–505

Head Matter:
FIRST NAT. BANK OF LONGVIEW, TEXAS, et al. v. STATE BANKING BOARD et al.
(No. 1003-4876.)
Commission of Appeals of Texas, Section A.
Dec. 12, 1928.
Young & Stinchcomb, of Longview, for re-lators.
. Claude Pollard, 'Atty. Gen., C. W. Truehart, Asst. Atty. Gen., and John W. Goodwm and L.' C. Sutton, both of Austin, for respondents.

Opinion:
HARVEY, P. J.
The Supreme Court has this day adopted the opinion of Section B of the Commission, in the case of Edwin Lacy et al. v. State Banking Board, 11 S.W. (2d) 496. The holding's in that opinion require the same disposition of this case that 'is made of that case.
We reco&mend that the mandamus sought herein be refused.
GREENWOOD and PIERSON, JJ. Opinion of the Commission of Appeals adopted, and mandamus refused.