Case Name: Clinton W. LOVE, Sr., and Rose Mary Love, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America; United States Department of Agriculture; Farmers Home Administration; Philip A. Young; Claude Hargrove; Arthur E. Lung; Theodore Hebnes; Roger Meredith; Rodger Vanvalkenburg; Dale Gilbert; Jim Walker; Stanley Faught, and Gilbert L. Anderson, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1991-09-18
Citations: 944 F.2d 632
Docket Number: No. 87-3832
Parties: Clinton W. LOVE, Sr., and Rose Mary Love, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America; United States Department of Agriculture; Farmers Home Administration; Philip A. Young; Claude Hargrove; Arthur E. Lung; Theodore Hebnes; Roger Meredith; Rodger Vanvalkenburg; Dale Gilbert; Jim Walker; Stanley Faught, and Gilbert L. Anderson, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before FLETCHER and D.W. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and CARROLL , District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 944
Pages: 632–638

Head Matter:
Clinton W. LOVE, Sr., and Rose Mary Love, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America; United States Department of Agriculture; Farmers Home Administration; Philip A. Young; Claude Hargrove; Arthur E. Lung; Theodore Hebnes; Roger Meredith; Rodger Vanvalkenburg; Dale Gilbert; Jim Walker; Stanley Faught, and Gilbert L. Anderson, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 87-3832.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Sept. 18, 1991.
Robert M. Kampfer, Gene A. Picotte, P.C., Clancy, Mont., for plaintiffs-appellants.
Robert J. Brooks, Asst. U.S. Atty., Great Falls, Mont., for defendants-appellees.
Before FLETCHER and D.W. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and CARROLL , District Judge.
Earl H. Carroll, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
ORDER
Circuit Judges Fletcher and Nelson have voted to deny the petition for rehearing, and to deny the petition for rehearing en banc. District Judge Carroll voted to grant the petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc.
On the request of a judge in regular active service, the suggestion for rehearing en banc was put to a vote of the full court, and the majority of the court voted to deny rehearing. Fed.R.App.P. 35(b). Circuit Judge O'Scannlain dissented from the denial of rehearing and was joined by Circuit Judges Poole, Norris, Hall and Kozinski. The dissent is filed as an attachment to this order.
The petition for rehearing is denied and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is rejected. The mandate shall issue forthwith.