Case Name: Pablo Alejandro GUZMAN BALBUENA; et al., Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-07-03
Citations: 188 F. App'x 602
Docket Number: No. 06-70310
Parties: Pablo Alejandro GUZMAN BALBUENA; et al., Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 188
Pages: 602–603

Head Matter:
Pablo Alejandro GUZMAN BALBUENA; et al., Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 06-70310.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
July 3, 2006.
Pablo Alejandro Guzman Balbuena, Westminister, CA, pro se.
Angela Yolanda Cazares De Guzman, Westminister, CA, pro se.
CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, OIL, David V. Bernal, Attorney, Jennifer Paisner, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: PREGERSON, TALLMAN and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
We have reviewed the response to the court's February 6, 2006 order to show cause, and we conclude that petitioners have failed to raise a colorable constitutional claim to invoke our jurisdiction over this petition for review. See Torres-Aguilar v. INS, 246 F.3d 1267, 1271 (9th Cir.2001) . Accordingly, we sua sponte dismiss this petition for review for lack of jurisdiction. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir.2003); Montero-Martinez v. Ashcroft, 277 F.3d 1137, 1144 (9th Cir.2002).
All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal and voluntary departure confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) and Desta v. Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004), shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.
DISMISSED.