Case Name: Harry S. Dube, Appellant, v. Bernice Dube, Respondent, and Long Island Railroad Company, Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1929-04
Citations: 226 A.D. 744
Docket Number: 
Parties: Harry S. Dube, Appellant, v. Bernice Dube, Respondent, and Long Island Railroad Company, Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 226
Pages: 744–744

Head Matter:
Harry S. Dube, Appellant, v. Bernice Dube, Respondent, and Long Island Railroad Company, Defendant.

Opinion:
Judgment reversed upon the law and new trial granted, costs to abide the event. The court committed error in ruling upon the evidence at foUos 109, 122, 163. One ruHng (Fol. 109) resulted in injecting into the case irrelevant prejudicial matter which aggravated the effect of counsel's statements of Hke character in the opening (Fol. 35). Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Kapper, CarsweU and Scudder, JJ., concur.