Case Name: Altony BROOKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael JOHNSON, Sheriff; Brenda Lambert, Detective; Justin Whack, Detective; Wayne Dewitt, Sheriff; Lonnie Allen Mizzelle, Detective; Danny Mizzelle, Detective; John Doe, Officer; Kimberly Barr, Solicitor; Sharon W Staggers, Clerk; M Morris, Clerk, sued in their individual and official capacities, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-10-27
Citations: 670 F. App'x 98
Docket Number: No. 16-6512
Parties: Altony BROOKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael JOHNSON, Sheriff; Brenda Lambert, Detective; Justin Whack, Detective; Wayne Dewitt, Sheriff; Lonnie Allen Mizzelle, Detective; Danny Mizzelle, Detective; John Doe, Officer; Kimberly Barr, Solicitor; Sharon W Staggers, Clerk; M Morris, Clerk, sued in their individual and official capacities, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 670
Pages: 98–98

Head Matter:
Altony BROOKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael JOHNSON, Sheriff; Brenda Lambert, Detective; Justin Whack, Detective; Wayne Dewitt, Sheriff; Lonnie Allen Mizzelle, Detective; Danny Mizzelle, Detective; John Doe, Officer; Kimberly Barr, Solicitor; Sharon W Staggers, Clerk; M Morris, Clerk, sued in their individual and official capacities, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-6512
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: October 11, 2016
Decided: October 27, 2016
Altony Brooks, Appellant Pro Se.
Before TRAXLER, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Altony Brooks appeals the district court's orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice, and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brooks v. Johnson, No. 2:15-cv-01074-PMD (D.S.C. Apr. 11 & May 25, 2016). We deny Brooks' motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED