Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Cesar Alejandro SORIANO, also known as Cesar Soriano, also known as Cesar Alejandro, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-08-18
Citations: 613 F. App'x 395
Docket Number: No. 14-31019
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Cesar Alejandro SORIANO, also known as Cesar Soriano, also known as Cesar Alejandro, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before JOLLY, GRAVES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 613
Pages: 395–395

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Cesar Alejandro SORIANO, also known as Cesar Soriano, also known as Cesar Alejandro, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 14-31019
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 18, 2015.
Hayden McClure Brockett, Esq., Trial Attorney, Kevin G. Boitmann, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Diane Hollenshead Copes, Esq., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, New Orleans, LA, Kevin C. Lombardi, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Christopher Albert Aberle, Mandeville, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before JOLLY, GRAVES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Cesar Alejandro Soriano has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Soriano has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.