Case Name: Lars A. LUNDEEN, Esq., Appellant, v. Yaffa DERMER, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jay Dermer, deceased, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1985-05-28
Citations: 469 So. 2d 935
Docket Number: No. 85-43
Parties: Lars A. LUNDEEN, Esq., Appellant, v. Yaffa DERMER, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jay Dermer, deceased, Appellee.
Judges: Before HENDRY, HUBBART and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 469
Pages: 935–936

Head Matter:
Lars A. LUNDEEN, Esq., Appellant, v. Yaffa DERMER, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jay Dermer, deceased, Appellee.
No. 85-43.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 28, 1985.
Gerald E. Rosser, Miami, for appellant.
Fine, Jacobson, Schwartz, Nash, Block & England and Gary E. Sherman and William J. Berger, Miami, for appellee.
Before HENDRY, HUBBART and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The order under review is a non-final order entered subsequent to settlement, granting appellee's motion for contempt and to enforce the court's order approving a stipulation between the parties.
It is appellant's contention that the trial court erred in holding that appellant had violated the stipulation and order, therefore there was no basis for holding appellant in contempt.
We have carefully considered appellant's contention on appeal in the light of the briefs and arguments of counsel and the record prepared by the parties, and have concluded that no reversible error has been demonstrated. Accordingly, the order appealed is affirmed.
Affirmed.