Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carl Lee BROWN, a/k/a Cuz, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-02-26
Citations: 313 F. App'x 653
Docket Number: No. 08-8204
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Carl Lee BROWN, a/k/a Cuz, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 313
Pages: 653–654

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Carl Lee BROWN, a/k/a Cuz, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 08-8204.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 19, 2009.
Decided: Feb. 26, 2009.
Carl Lee Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Manuelian, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Carl Lee Brown appeals the district court's orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Brown, No. 1:97-cr-00441-MJG-1 (D. Md. Sept. 11 & 29, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.