Case Name: ANGELUS BUILDING & INVESTMENT COMPANY, a Corporation, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1932-03-21
Citations: 57 F.2d 133
Docket Number: No. 6580
Parties: ANGELUS BUILDING & INVESTMENT COMPANY, a Corporation, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 57
Pages: 133–133

Head Matter:
ANGELUS BUILDING & INVESTMENT COMPANY, a Corporation, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
No. 6580.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
March 21, 1932.
George Bouchard and Joseph D. Brady, both of Los Angelos, Cal., for appellant.
G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Sewall Key and John G. llemy, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., for respondent.
Before WILBDR and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges, and JAMES, District Judge.

Opinion:
JAMES, District Judge.
The petition for review of tho decision of the Board of Tax Appeals, as made in the case under the above number, involves tho same questions as were considered in ease No. 6579 (C. C. A.) 57 E.(2d) 130, the only difference being that the tax assessed referred to the year 1.923, whereas, in case No. 6579, the year involved was 1922. The parties stipulated that judgment in this ease should follow the decision in case No. 6579.
Tho order of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed.