Case Name: William HUNTLEY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2015-03-10
Citations: 457 S.W.3d 388
Docket Number: No. ED 101698
Parties: William HUNTLEY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 457
Pages: 388–388

Head Matter:
William HUNTLEY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 101698
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
FILED: March 10, 2015
Amanda Page Faerber, Missouri Public Defender, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.
Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
William Huntley (Movant) appeals from the motion court's "Conclusions of Law and Order" denying Movant's Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief and request for evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).