Case Name: Scott WEDINGTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-02-06
Citations: 86 F. App'x 617
Docket Number: No. 03-7451
Parties: Scott WEDINGTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 86
Pages: 617–618

Head Matter:
Scott WEDINGTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 03-7451.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 29, 2004.
Decided Feb. 6, 2004.
Scott Wedington, Appellant pro se.
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Scott Wedington appeals the district court's order dismissing as frivolous his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Wedington v. U.S. District Court, No. CA-03-2431-8-DKC (D.Md. Aug. 29, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED