Case Name: Tex May v. The State
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1923-02-28
Citations: 94 Tex. Crim. 228
Docket Number: No. 7498
Parties: Tex May v. The State.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Criminal Reports
Volume: 94
Pages: 228–229

Head Matter:
Tex May v. The State.
No. 7498.
Decided February 28, 1923.
Rehearing Denied April, 1923.
1. —Robbery—Sufficiency of- the Evidence — Practice on Appeal.
In the absence of a bill of exceptions and a statement of facts, the indictment charging robbery and the judgment was in proper form, the conviction is sustained.
2. —Rehearing—Certiorari—Pauper’s Affidavit.
Where appellant, in motion for rehearing, asked for a writ of certiorari to perfect the record, averring that he made pauper’s affidavit under the statute, and attached a purported copy thereof, but there was no showing that such affidavit was ever filed or called to the attention of the trial court, the writ will be denied.
Appeal from the.Crim. District Court of Dallas. Tried below before the Hon. C. A. Pippen.
Appeal from a conviction of robbery; penalty, five years imprisonment in the penitentiary.
The opinion states the case.
No brief on file for appellant.
R. G. Storey, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Opinion:
HAWKINS, Judge.
Conviction is for robbery with punishment of twenty-five years in the penitentiary.
There are no bills of exception in the record and no statement of facts. The indictment charges an offense,' and the judgment appears to be in proper form.
The judgment must be affirmed.
Affirmed.