Case Name: Gary Andrew DOYLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-02-13
Citations: 807 So. 2d 176
Docket Number: No. 4D01-4909
Parties: Gary Andrew DOYLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: WARNER, KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 807
Pages: 176–177

Head Matter:
Gary Andrew DOYLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D01-4909.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb. 13, 2002.
Richard W. Springer of Richard W. Springer, P.A., Palm Springs, for appellant.
No appearance required for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the order summarily denying appellant's motion for post-conviction relief, seeking to vacate his conviction based on the alleged involuntariness of his plea. See Stretcher v. State, 803 So.2d 813 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). As we did in Stretcher, we certify as a question of great public importance the same question certified in Major v. State, 790 So.2d 550, 553 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001):
WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?
WARNER, KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.