Case Name: David M. LANDAY and Patberg Carmody & Ging, Respondents v. RITE AID, Petitioner
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2013-08-27
Citations: 621 Pa. 108
Docket Number: No. 175 WAL 2012
Parties: David M. LANDAY and Patberg Carmody & Ging, Respondents v. RITE AID, Petitioner.
Judges: 
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 621
Pages: 108–108

Head Matter:
73 A.3d 577
David M. LANDAY and Patberg Carmody & Ging, Respondents v. RITE AID, Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Aug. 27, 2013.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 27th day of August, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are:
(1) Does the Medical Records Act apply to a pharmacy's provision of copies of records?
(2) Under the Medical Récords Act, may a pharmacy charge a flat fee for the reproduction of pharmacy records if it gives the customer an invoice setting forth the fee and the customer reviews and pays the invoice without objection before receiving the pharmacy records?