Case Name: LOUIS SCHLESINGER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. FREDERICK KESSELL, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1904-12-09
Citations: 71 N.J.L. 340
Docket Number: 
Parties: LOUIS SCHLESINGER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. FREDERICK KESSELL, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 71
Pages: 340–340

Head Matter:
LOUIS SCHLESINGER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. FREDERICK KESSELL, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
Argued June 20, 1904
Decided December 9, 1904.
On error to the Supreme Court.
For the plaintiff in error, Guild, Lum & Tamblyn.
For the defendant in error, Charles F. Iierr.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The nonsuit disclosed byr the record was sustained in the Supreme Court upon the authority of Stout v. Humphrey, 40 Vroom 436.
We think this conclusion correct, and the judgment must therefore he affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Dixon, Garrison, Pitney, Bogert, Tredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray. 9.
For reversal — None.