Case Name: William D. MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John CROW, Administrator, Lincoln Correctional Center; Randy S. Mull, Disciplinary Hearing Officer; Karen Lopous, Food Service; Roger Patterson, Regional Director, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-11-25
Citations: 585 F. App'x 268
Docket Number: No. 14-6935
Parties: William D. MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John CROW, Administrator, Lincoln Correctional Center; Randy S. Mull, Disciplinary Hearing Officer; Karen Lopous, Food Service; Roger Patterson, Regional Director, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before KING and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 585
Pages: 268–268

Head Matter:
William D. MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John CROW, Administrator, Lincoln Correctional Center; Randy S. Mull, Disciplinary Hearing Officer; Karen Lopous, Food Service; Roger Patterson, Regional Director, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 14-6935.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 20, 2014.
Decided: Nov. 25, 2014.
William D. Moore, Appellant Pro Se.
Before KING and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
William D. Moore appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Moore v. Crow, No. 5:14-cv-00015-FDW, 2014 WL 2573036. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.