Case Name: Sylvester M. McNally and Dorothy C. McNally vs. Fred M. Patterson and Lillian M. Patterson
Court: Maine Supreme Judicial Court
Jurisdiction: Maine
Decision Date: 1957-10-11
Citations: 153 Me. 115
Docket Number: 
Parties: Sylvester M. McNally and Dorothy C. McNally vs. Fred M. Patterson and Lillian M. Patterson
Judges: Sitting: Williamson, C. J., Webber, Beliveau, Tapley, Sullivan, Dubord, JJ.
Reporter: Maine Reports
Volume: 153
Pages: 115–115

Head Matter:
Sylvester M. McNally and Dorothy C. McNally vs. Fred M. Patterson and Lillian M. Patterson
Penobscot.
Opinion, October 11, 1957.
John H. Needham, for the plaintiff.
Oscar Walker, for the defendant.
Sitting: Williamson, C. J., Webber, Beliveau, Tapley, Sullivan, Dubord, JJ.

Opinion:
Per curiam.
This is an action upon a writ of entry. The plaintiff received a verdict with a special finding establishing the disputed property line and an award of damages. The case is before us upon the stereotyped motion for a new trial.
There was substantial, credible evidence to support the verdict in all respects. A discussion of the evidence would be futile. The jury entertained and answered authoritatively a typical, jury question with finality. A careful examination of the record discloses no error of law or of fact in the verdict, which requires correction. McCully v. Bessey, 142 Me. 209, 212.
Motion denied.