Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JACOB ALAN HARTMAN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2011-02-23
Citations: 241 Or. App. 195
Docket Number: 08051338C; A140036
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JACOB ALAN HARTMAN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before Wollheim, Presiding Judge, and Brewer, Chief Judge, and Rosenblum, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 241
Pages: 195–196

Head Matter:
On respondent’s petition for reconsideration filed November 30, 2010,
reconsideration allowed; former disposition (238 Or App 582, 243 P3d 480 (2010)) withdrawn; convictions on Counts 2 and 3 reversed; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed February 23, 2011
STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JACOB ALAN HARTMAN, Defendant-Appellant.
Malheur County Circuit Court
08051338C; A140036
248 P3d 448
John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Michael A. Casper, Assistant Attorney General, for petition.
Before Wollheim, Presiding Judge, and Brewer, Chief Judge, and Rosenblum, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
The state petitions for reconsideration of our decision in this case, State v. Hartman, 238 Or App 582, 243 P3d 480 (2010), arguing that this court erred in its disposition of the case. In our original opinion, we reversed the trial court's denial of defendant's motion to suppress evidence, and, consequently, we reversed and remanded the case. The state points out that the evidence at issue in defendant's motion concerned only two of the seven counts of which defendant was convicted and, thus, our disposition properly should have been to affirm defendant's convictions on the counts not affected by our reversal of the trial court's denial of defendant's motion to suppress. The state's point is well taken.
Reconsideration allowed; former disposition withdrawn; convictions on Counts 2 and 3 reversed; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.