Case Name: PADGITT v. FT. WORTH & R. G. RY. CO.
Court: Texas Courts of Civil Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1911-06-07
Citations: 138 S.W. 1198
Docket Number: 
Parties: PADGITT v. FT. WORTH & R. G. RY. CO.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 138
Pages: 1198–1198

Head Matter:
PADGITT v. FT. WORTH & R. G. RY. CO.
(Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Austin.
June 7, 1911.)
Error from Brown County Court; A. M. Brumfield, Judge. Action by G. M. Padgitt against the Et. Worth & Rio Grande Railway Company. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
Affirmed.
See, also, 136 S. W. 442.
Harrison & Wayman, for plaintiff in error.
Andrews, Ball & Street-man and C. L. McCartney, for defendant in error.

Opinion:
KEY, C. J.
In this case the plaintiff sought to recover from the defendant railway company the value of a mule, which was struck and killed by one of defendant's trains. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for the defendant, and the plaintiff has brought the case to this court by writ of error. We have considered all the assignments presented, and reached the conclusion that reversible error has not been shown. We hold that no affirmative error has been pointed, out in the charge of the court, and that plaintiff in error's requested instructions were properly refused. Judgment affirmed.