Case Name: STATE of Missouri, ex rel. Carl D. KINSKY, Relator/Respondent, v. Carol STEIGER, Respondent/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2004-09-07
Citations: 143 S.W.3d 656
Docket Number: No. ED 83902
Parties: STATE of Missouri, ex rel. Carl D. KINSKY, Relator/Respondent, v. Carol STEIGER, Respondent/Appellant.
Judges: Before GLENN A. NORTON, J., BOOKER T. SHAW, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 143
Pages: 656–657

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, ex rel. Carl D. KINSKY, Relator/Respondent, v. Carol STEIGER, Respondent/Appellant.
No. ED 83902.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Sept. 7, 2004.
Matthew Briesacher, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Appellant.
Carl Dietrich Kinsky, Pro Se, Ste Genevieve, MO, for Respondent.
Before GLENN A. NORTON, J., BOOKER T. SHAW, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Carol Steiger appeals from the trial courts summary judgment in favor of Carl Kinsky. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of Kinsky. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 84.16(b).