Case Name: Arthur O. Steenburg, Alfred C. Steenburg and Alice W. Steenburg, His Wife, Appellants, v. William B. Phifer, Appellee
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1915-04-27
Citations: 69 Fla. 517
Docket Number: 
Parties: Arthur O. Steenburg, Alfred C. Steenburg and Alice W. Steenburg, His Wife, Appellants, v. William B. Phifer, Appellee.
Judges: Shackleford, J., concurs in this dissent.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 69
Pages: 517–519

Head Matter:
Arthur O. Steenburg, Alfred C. Steenburg and Alice W. Steenburg, His Wife, Appellants, v. William B. Phifer, Appellee.
Decision Filed April 27, 1915.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This cause having been submitted to the court at a former term thereof, upon the transcript of the record of the appeal aforesaid, and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said decree; it is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed; it is further ordered that the appellee do have and recover of and from the appellants his costs bj him in this behalf expended, which costs are taxed at the sum of.........., all of which is ordered to be certified to the court below.
Appeal from Circuit Court for Alachua County; Jas. T. Wills, Judge.