Case Name: Columbus Bar Assn. v. King
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2002-01-25
Citations: 94 Ohio St. 3d 1443
Docket Number: 98-423
Parties: Columbus Bar Assn. v. King.
Judges: 
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 94
Pages: 1443–1444

Head Matter:
DISCIPLINARY DOCKET
98-423.
Columbus Bar Assn. v. King.

Opinion:
On January 10, 2002, respondent filed a motion for elimination or reduction of time and for clarification of the issues presented at oral argument on January 8, 2002. It is determined by the court that respondent's motion consists of arguments on the merits of the case. Whereas S.Ct.Prac.R. IX(9) prohibits the filing of additional materials relating to the merits of the case after the case has been orally argued,
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that respondent's motion be, and hereby is, stricken.