Case Name: Faina Slivkina, Appellant, v. County of Westchester et al., Respondents. (Action No. 1.); Claire S. Meadow et al., Appellants, v. County of Westchester et al., Respondents. (Action No. 2.)
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1998-05-18
Citations: 250 A.D.2d 754
Docket Number: 
Parties: Faina Slivkina, Appellant, v County of Westchester et al., Respondents. (Action No. 1.) Claire S. Meadow et al., Appellants, v County of Westchester et al., Respondents. (Action No. 2.)
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 250
Pages: 754–755

Head Matter:
Faina Slivkina, Appellant, v County of Westchester et al., Respondents. (Action No. 1.) Claire S. Meadow et al., Appellants, v County of Westchester et al., Respondents. (Action No. 2.)
[672 NYS2d 780]

Opinion:
—In two related actions, inter alia, to recover damages for false arrest, false imprisonment, and malicious prosecution, the plaintiffs in Action Nos. 1 and 2 appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Silverman, J.), entered March 4, 1997, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendants and against them.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The jury's verdict was based upon a fair interpretation of the evidence and we discern no reason to disturb it (see, Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129).
The plaintiffs' remaining contentions are without merit. O'Brien, J. P., Santucci, Joy and McGinity, JJ., concur.