Case Name: MARY TRAIN, Administratrix of D. Train, v. GEORGE CONWELL, FISHER CONWELL and ELIAS CONWELL, Executors of Elias Conwell
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Delaware
Decision Date: 1793-11
Citations: 1 Del. Cas. 13
Docket Number: 
Parties: MARY TRAIN, Administratrix of D. Train, v. GEORGE CONWELL, FISHER CONWELL and ELIAS CONWELL, Executors of Elias Conwell.
Judges: 
Reporter: Delaware Cases
Volume: 1
Pages: 13–14

Head Matter:
MARY TRAIN, Administratrix of D. Train, v. GEORGE CONWELL, FISHER CONWELL and ELIAS CONWELL, Executors of Elias Conwell.
Supreme Court.
November, 1793.
Wilson’s Red Book, 8.
This case is also reported in Bayard’s Notebook, 4; Miller’s Notebook, 46; Read’s Notebook, 7.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The cases cited for defendants show that a judgment confessed by one executor where there are more may be reversed, but still it is a judgment, and therefore supports the plaintiff against the plea; but we do not say what we should, do if the other executors came before us upon the execution.