Case Name: In the Matter of Shiseido Cosmetics (America) , Ltd., et al., Respondents, v. State Human Rights Appeal Board et al., Respondents, and Joan C. Laufer, Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1981-02-10
Citations: 52 N.Y.2d 916
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Shiseido Cosmetics (America) , Ltd., et al., Respondents, v State Human Rights Appeal Board et al., Respondents, and Joan C. Laufer, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 52
Pages: 916–918

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Shiseido Cosmetics (America) , Ltd., et al., Respondents, v State Human Rights Appeal Board et al., Respondents, and Joan C. Laufer, Appellant.
Argued January 5, 1981;
decided February 10, 1981
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Michael F. Erdheim for appellant.
Lloyd De Vos for petitioners-respondents.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs. We agree, and for the reasons stated by the Appellate Division, that there is not sufficient evidence on the record considered as a whole to support the determination of the State Human Rights Appeal Board that respondent discriminated against complainant because of her national origin in violation of the Human Rights Law.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.