Case Name: Matthew Spencer O'BRIEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mr. SUMMERFIELD, Defendant-Appellee, and Dr. Brooks; Bobby P. Shearin; J. Michael Stouffer; Scott S. Oakley, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-08-21
Citations: 475 F. App'x 927
Docket Number: No. 12-6812
Parties: Matthew Spencer O’BRIEN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Mr. SUMMERFIELD, Defendant-Appellee, and Dr. Brooks; Bobby P. Shearin; J. Michael Stouffer; Scott S. Oakley, Defendants.
Judges: Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 475
Pages: 927–928

Head Matter:
Matthew Spencer O’BRIEN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Mr. SUMMERFIELD, Defendant-Appellee, and Dr. Brooks; Bobby P. Shearin; J. Michael Stouffer; Scott S. Oakley, Defendants.
No. 12-6812.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 16, 2012.
Decided: Aug. 21, 2012.
Matthew Spencer O’Brien, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Christopher Costello, Wharton, Levin, Ehrmantraut, Klein & Nash, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Matthew Spencer O'Brien appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. O'Brien v. Summerfield, No. 1:11-cv-02346-ELH (D. Md. Feb. 21, 2012); 2012 WL 1150797 (Apr. 5, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.