Case Name: Joseph Anthony Skavina v. Janet Skavina
Court: New Hampshire Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Hampshire
Decision Date: 1945-03-06
Citations: 93 N.H. 335
Docket Number: No. 3518
Parties: Joseph Anthony Skavina v. Janet Skavina.
Judges: Branch, J., was absent.
Reporter: New Hampshire Reports
Volume: 93
Pages: 335–335

Head Matter:
Hillsborough,
Mar. 6, 1945.
No. 3518.
Joseph Anthony Skavina v. Janet Skavina.
Chretien & Craig (Mr. Chretien orally), for the plaintiff.
Arthur B. Hayden and Osgood & Osgood (Mr. Hayden orally), for the defendant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The petition alleges sufficient grounds for annulment. However, we deem it inexpedient to consider at this time the numerous allegations of fraud, some of which may not be sustained by the evidence. The contention that the plaintiff does not come into equity with "clean hands" is not conclusive. See 16 Minn. Law Rev. 215.
Exception sustained.
Branch, J., was absent.