Case Name: Robin J. VINESETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-06-06
Citations: 523 F. App'x 248
Docket Number: No. 12-1876
Parties: Robin J. VINESETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 523
Pages: 248–249

Head Matter:
Robin J. VINESETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 12-1876.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 29, 2013.
Decided: June 6, 2013.
Kirk J. Angel, The Angel Law Firm, PLLC, Concord, North Carolina, for Appellant. Charles A. Gartland, II, Leslie W. Bradenham, Susan B. Molony, Alston & Bird, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appel-lee.
Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Robin J. Vinesett appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of United Parcel Service on his employment discrimination case. We have reviewed the record and the briefs filed by the parties and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Vinesett v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., No. 3:10cv415, 2012 WL 2326035 (W.D.N.C. June 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.