Case Name: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. Jay MOTT a/k/a Leroy Tillman, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1989-09-29
Citations: 522 Pa. 487
Docket Number: Appeal No. 107 W.D. Appeal Dkt., 1988
Parties: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. Jay MOTT a/k/a Leroy Tillman, Appellant.
Judges: Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDermott, zappala and papadakos, jj.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 522
Pages: 487–488

Head Matter:
563 A.2d 1181
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. Jay MOTT a/k/a Leroy Tillman, Appellant.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued Sept. 29, 1989.
Decided Sept. 29, 1989.
Shelley Stark, Chief-Appellate Counsel, Office of the Public Defender, Pittsburgh, for appellant.
Leonard N. Sosnov, Philadelphia, amicus curiae, for Defender Ass’n of Philadelphia.
Robert E. Colville, Dist. Atty., Claire C. Capristo, Deputy Dist. Atty., Kemal Alexander Mericli, Asst. Dist. Atty., Pittsburgh, for appellee.
George S. Leone, Asst. Dist. Atty., Ronald Eisenberg, Chief, Appeals Unit, Philadelphia, amicus curiae, for PA Dist. Attorneys’ Ass’n.
Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDermott, zappala and papadakos, jj.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
AND NOW, this 29th day of September, 1989, by concession of the Commonwealth as to the issue of improper jury instructions, a new trial is granted.