Case Name: MONROE AUTO EQUIPMENT COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HECKETHORN MANUFACTURING & SUPPLY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1962-08-06
Citations: 305 F.2d 375
Docket Number: No. 15037
Parties: MONROE AUTO EQUIPMENT COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HECKETHORN MANUFACTURING & SUPPLY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before CECIL, WEICK and O’SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 305
Pages: 375–375

Head Matter:
MONROE AUTO EQUIPMENT COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HECKETHORN MANUFACTURING & SUPPLY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 15037.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
Aug. 6, 1962.
Don K. Harness & Robert L. Boynton, Harness, Dickey & Pierce, Detroit, Mich., Walter P. Armstrong, Jr., Armstrong, McCadden, Allen, Braden & Goodman, Memphis, Tenn., for appellant.
Robert F. Conrad, Watson, Cole, Grindle & Watson, Washington, D. C., Ewell & Ewell, Dyersburg, Tenn., Albert E. Strasser, Yungblut, Melville, Strasser & Foster, Cincinnati, Ohio., for appellee.
Before CECIL, WEICK and O’SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER.
The judgment of the District Court is vacated and this cause is remanded for consideration in the light of Dairy Queen Inc. v. Wood, 369 U.S. 469, 82 S.Ct. 894, 8 L.Ed.2d 44 and Shubin v. United States District Court, 369 U.S. 660, 82 S.Ct. 1035, 8 L.Ed.2d 273.