Case Name: REYNOLDS v. GILBERT
Court: Texas Courts of Civil Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1925-11-20
Citations: 284 S.W. 330
Docket Number: No. 52
Parties: REYNOLDS v. GILBERT.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 284
Pages: 330–331

Head Matter:
REYNOLDS v. GILBERT.
(No. 52.)
(Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Eastland.
Nov. 20, 1925.)
Grisham Bros., of Eastland, for appellant.
B. L. Russell, of Baird, and Scarborough & Wilson, of Abilene, for appellee.

Opinion:
LITTLER, J.
This is a suit instituted by Scott W. Gilbert, appellee, against J. H. Reynolds, W. H. Reynolds, and O. M. Reynolds, appellants, to recover upon a promissory note in the sum of $3,280.50, alleged to be executed by the three defendants, J. H. Reynolds, W. H. Reynolds, and C. M. Reynolds.
The record shows that a Judgment.was rendered against J. H. Reynolds and O. M. Reynolds, but fails to show that disposition of the case was made as to the defendant W. H. Reynolds, and therefore fails to show that there was a final judgment in the case. Kolp v. Weil Bros. (Tex. Civ. App.) 173 S. W. 1006; Willis v. Keator (Tex. Civ. App.) 181 S. W. 556; G., C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Atlantic Fruit Dist. (Tex. Civ. App.) 184 S. W. 294; Williams v. Bell, 53 Tex. Civ. App. 474, 116 S. W. 837; Railway Co. v. Scott, 78 Tex. 360, 14 S. W. 791; Railway Co. v. Smith Co., 58 Tex. 76.
There being no final judgment shown by the record, this court is without jurisdiction, and the appeal is therefore dismissed.