Case Name: E. Reinhold ROGERS, Jr., Intervenor, Appellant, v. CITY OF CLEARWATER, Florida, the State of Florida and others, Appellee
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1954-07-30
Citations: 74 So. 2d 87
Docket Number: 
Parties: E. Reinhold ROGERS, Jr., Intervenor, Appellant, v. CITY OF CLEARWATER, Florida, the State of Florida and others, Appellee.
Judges: ROBERTS, C. J., and TERRELL, SE-BRING and HOBSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 74
Pages: 87–87

Head Matter:
E. Reinhold ROGERS, Jr., Intervenor, Appellant, v. CITY OF CLEARWATER, Florida, the State of Florida and others, Appellee.
Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division A.
July 30, 1954.
Robert R. Tench, Clearwater, for appellant.
Charles M. Phillips, Jr., Clearwater, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on authority of State v. City of Pensacola, Fla., 40 So.2d 569; Schmeller v. City of Fort Lauderdale, Fla., 38 So.2d 36; State v. City of Clearwater, 124 Fla. 354, 168 So. 546; State v. City of Coral Gables, Fla., 72 So.2d 48; State v. City of Jacksonville, 53 So.2d 306; and State v. City of Miami, Fla., 72 So.2d 655. The case of North Shore Bank v. Town of Surfside, Fla., 72 So.2d 659, is distinguishable in that it concerned an express legislative prohibition against the issuance of bonds in the manner there attempted.
ROBERTS, C. J., and TERRELL, SE-BRING and HOBSON, JJ., concur.