Case Name: Roland KILCREASE, and Wilma Kilcrease, his wife, Appellants, v. Roland KILCREASE, for the Use and Benefit of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, a corporation, and Raymond Harper, and Diane Harper, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1969-06-19
Citations: 223 So. 2d 755
Docket Number: No. K-199
Parties: Roland KILCREASE, and Wilma Kilcrease, his wife, Appellants, v. Roland KILCREASE, for the Use and Benefit of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, a corporation, and Raymond Harper, and Diane Harper, Appellees.
Judges: RAWLS, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 223
Pages: 755–755

Head Matter:
Roland KILCREASE, and Wilma Kilcrease, his wife, Appellants, v. Roland KILCREASE, for the Use and Benefit of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, a corporation, and Raymond Harper, and Diane Harper, Appellees.
No. K-199.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.
June 19, 1969.
Tom C. Meers, Jacksonville, for appellants.
Ronald L. Palmer, of Mathews, Osborne & Ehrlich, and Boyd, Jenerette & Leemis, Jacksonville, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment appealed is affirmed on authority of Shingleton et al. v. Bussey, 223 So.2d 713, decided by the Supreme Court of Florida May 28, 1969.
RAWLS, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.