Case Name: Donald DOXZEN, Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF PATUXENT INSTITUTION, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1971-10-19
Citations: 448 F.2d 786
Docket Number: No. 13291
Parties: Donald DOXZEN, Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF PATUXENT INSTITUTION, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 448
Pages: 786–786

Head Matter:
Donald DOXZEN, Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF PATUXENT INSTITUTION, Appellee.
No. 13291.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Argued Oct. 7, 1971.
Decided Oct. 19, 1971.
Richard L. Bazelon, Philadelphia, Pa. (Dilworth, Paxson, Kalish, Levy & Coleman, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.
Alfred J. O’Ferrall, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., of Maryland (Francis B. Burch, Atty. Gen., of Maryland, on the brief), for appellee.
Before BOREMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and CRAVEN and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
This appeal, assailing the constitutional validity of procedure under Article 31B, § 5 and 7(a), Annotated Code of Maryland, raises issues similar to those disposed of in Sas v. State of Maryland (CA 4, 1964) 334 F.2d 506, and Tippett v. State of Maryland (CA 4, 1971) 436 F.2d 1153. On the authority of those decisions, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
Affirmed.