Case Name: PARADISE CABLE, INC., Petitioner v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and United States of America, Respondents
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-02-15
Citations: 173 F. App'x 840
Docket Number: No. 05-1040
Parties: PARADISE CABLE, INC., Petitioner v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and United States of America, Respondents.
Judges: Before: GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and HENDERSON and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 173
Pages: 840–840

Head Matter:
PARADISE CABLE, INC., Petitioner v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and United States of America, Respondents.
No. 05-1040.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Feb. 15, 2006.
Donald J. Evans, Fletcher, Heald & Hildreth, Arlington, VA, for Petitioner.
Daniel McMullen Armstrong, Associate General Counsel, Stanley R. Schemer, Austin C. Schlick, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC, for Respondents.
Before: GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and HENDERSON and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
JUDGMENT
This petition for review of an order of the Federal Communications Commission was presented to the court, and briefed and argued by counsel. It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition be denied for the reasons stated in the order of the Commission. See In the Matter of Application of Inforum Commc'ns, Inc., and TDI Acquisition Corp., 20 F.C.C.R. 820 (2005).
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.