Case Name: CAPITOL HOUSE PRESERVATION COMPANY, L.L.C. v. PERRYMAN CONSULTANTS, INCORPORATED; Mr. M. Ray Perryman; XYZ Insurance Company; and TUV Insurance Company
Court: Louisiana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 2000-02-11
Citations: 754 So. 2d 937
Docket Number: No. 1999-C-3446
Parties: CAPITOL HOUSE PRESERVATION COMPANY, L.L.C. v. PERRYMAN CONSULTANTS, INCORPORATED; Mr. M. Ray Perryman; XYZ Insurance Company; and TUV Insurance Company.
Judges: VICTORY, J., not on panel; LEMMON, J., concurs, not necessarily agreeing that the period of limitation in La.Rev.Stat. 51:1409 E is peremptive, especially since the Legislative expressly used the word “prescription” and nothing indicates an intent or a necessity for peremptive classification.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 754
Pages: 937–938

Head Matter:
CAPITOL HOUSE PRESERVATION COMPANY, L.L.C. v. PERRYMAN CONSULTANTS, INCORPORATED; Mr. M. Ray Perryman; XYZ Insurance Company; and TUV Insurance Company.
No. 1999-C-3446.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Feb. 11, 2000.

Opinion:
In re Argosy Gaming Company; Catfish Queen Prtn.; Argosy of Louisiana Inc.;— Defendant(s); Applying for Writ of Certio-rari and/or Review, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. H, Nos. 418,525; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 98 CA 2216.
Denied.
VICTORY, J., not on panel; LEMMON, J., concurs, not necessarily agreeing that the period of limitation in La.Rev.Stat. 51:1409 E is peremptive, especially since the Legislative expressly used the word "prescription" and nothing indicates an intent or a necessity for peremptive classification.