Case Name: Phillip SALLAS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-01-02
Citations: 593 So. 2d 211
Docket Number: No. 77074
Parties: Phillip SALLAS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: OVERTON, MCDONALD, GRIMES and HARDING, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 593
Pages: 211–211

Head Matter:
Phillip SALLAS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 77074.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Jan. 2, 1992.
Louis 0. Frost, Jr., Public Defender and James T. Miller, Asst. Public Defender, Fourth Judicial Circuit, Jacksonville, for petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Kathleen E. Moore, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have for review Sallas v. State, No. 90-1810 (Fla. 1st DCA Dec. 10, 1990) (unpublished order), which certified the same question of great public importance answered by this Court in Godwin v. State, 593 So.2d 211 (Fla.1992). The order below is quashed and this cause is remanded for reconsideration in light of our opinion in Godwin.
It is so ordered.
OVERTON, MCDONALD, GRIMES and HARDING, JJ., concur.
BARKETT, J., concurs in result only.
KOGAN, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with an opinion, in which SHAW, C.J., and BARKETT, J., concur.