Case Name: Ricardo SALAS-HERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-08-23
Citations: 668 F. App'x 302
Docket Number: No. 14-72007
Parties: Ricardo SALAS-HERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 668
Pages: 302–303

Head Matter:
Ricardo SALAS-HERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 14-72007
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted August 16, 2016
Filed August 23, 2016
Ricardo Salas-Hernandez, Las Vegas, NV, Pro Se.
Stefanie N. Hennes, Trial Attorney, OIL, Washington, DC,' Chief Counsel ICE, San Francisco, CA.
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Ricardo Salas-Hernandez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge's ("IJ") order granting post-conclusion voluntary departure. We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to consider Salas-Hernandez' unexhausted contentions that his former counsel provided ineffective assistance, and that the IJ forced his former counsel to withdraw Salas-Hernandez' application for cancellation of removal. See Tijani v. Holder, 628 F.3d 1071, 1080 (9th Cir. 2010) (the court lacks jurisdiction to consider legal claims not presented in an alien's administrative proceedings before the agency).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
phis disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.