Case Name: London & Scottish Assurance Corporation, Limited, a corporation, Plaintiff in Error, vs. Vitale Dolce, Defendant in Error
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1932-12-03
Citations: 107 Fla. 343
Docket Number: 
Parties: London & Scottish Assurance Corporation, Limited, a corporation, Plaintiff in Error, vs. Vitale Dolce, Defendant in Error.
Judges: Buford, C.J. and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 107
Pages: 343–344

Head Matter:
London & Scottish Assurance Corporation, Limited, a corporation, Plaintiff in Error, vs. Vitale Dolce, Defendant in Error.
144 So. 880.
Decision filed December 3, 1932.
Hampton & Bull, for Plaintiff in Error;
Macfarlane, Pettingill, Macfarlane & Fowler, for Defendant in Error.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been sub-' mitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised o'f its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that .there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Buford, C.J. and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.
Brown, J., dissents.