Case Name: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. William REDDICK, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1967-05-24
Citations: 199 So. 2d 99
Docket Number: No. 35924
Parties: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. William REDDICK, Respondent.
Judges: THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 199
Pages: 99–99

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. William REDDICK, Respondent.
No. 35924.
Supreme Court of Florida.
May 24, 1967.
Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and William D. Roth, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.
John J. Duffy, Clearwater, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard oral argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and O'CONNELL, JJ., concur.