Case Name: Jason Paul BOUDREAUX, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2010-08-12
Citations: 45 So. 3d 36
Docket Number: No. 1D10-2367
Parties: Jason Paul BOUDREAUX, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ROBERTS and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 45
Pages: 36–37

Head Matter:
Jason Paul BOUDREAUX, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D10-2367.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Aug. 12, 2010.
Rehearing Denied Sept. 28, 2010.
Jason Paul Boudreaux, pro se, Appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
THOMAS, J.
We affirm the order dismissing Appellant's motion for postconviction relief and amended motion for postconviction relief as untimely. Appellant filed a timely eleven-claim motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The post-conviction court found that two of Appellant's claims were facially insufficient and, pursuant to Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754 (Fla.2007), permitted Appellant to file an amended motion within 60 days. Spera requires that a movant be given a "reasonable opportunity to amend insufficient claims", and implies that the period not exceed 30 days. In the instant case, instead of filing a timely amended motion, Appellant moved for an extension of time to file his amendment, which was denied, and caused further delay by appealing to this court. When Appellant did file his amended motion, both the two-year window for rule 3.850 motions and the 60-day period given to amend his motion had passed, and the amended motion was therefore untimely filed. Furthermore, Appellant waived his arguments concerning his nine claims which were originally timely filed because he failed to specifically address these claims in his Initial Brief.
AFFIRMED.
ROBERTS and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.