Case Name: DAMPSKIBSSELSKABET NORDEN AKTIESELSKAB v. THE UNITED STATES; AKTIESELSKABET DAMPSKIBSSELSKABET "VESTERHAVET", v. THE UNITED STATES; REDERIET "OCEAN" AKTIESELSKAB, v. THE UNITED STATES; DET FORENEDE DAMPSKIBS-SELSKAB AKTIESELSKAB, v. THE UNITED STATES; AKTIESELSKABET DAMPSKIBSSELSKABET "VENDILA", v. THE UNITED STATES
Court: United States Court of Claims
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1955-07-12
Citations: 132 Ct. Cl. 752
Docket Number: No. 50447; No. 50448; No. 50463; No. 50464; No. 50465; No. 50466
Parties: DAMPSKIBSSELSKABET NORDEN AKTIESELSKAB v. THE UNITED STATES DAMPSKIBSSELSKABET TORM AKTIESELSKAB v. THE UNITED STATES AKTIESELSKABET DAMPSKIBSSELSKABET “VESTERHAVET”, v. THE UNITED STATES REDERIET “OCEAN” AKTIESELSKAB, v. THE UNITED STATES DET FORENEDE DAMPSKIBS-SELSKAB AKTIESELSKAB, v. THE UNITED STATES AKTIESELSKABET DAMPSKIBSSELSKABET “VENDILA”, v. THE UNITED STATES
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Court of Claims Reports
Volume: 132
Pages: 752–753

Head Matter:
DAMPSKIBSSELSKABET NORDEN AKTIESELSKAB v. THE UNITED STATES DAMPSKIBSSELSKABET TORM AKTIESELSKAB v. THE UNITED STATES AKTIESELSKABET DAMPSKIBSSELSKABET “VESTERHAVET”, v. THE UNITED STATES REDERIET “OCEAN” AKTIESELSKAB, v. THE UNITED STATES DET FORENEDE DAMPSKIBS-SELSKAB AKTIESELSKAB, v. THE UNITED STATES AKTIESELSKABET DAMPSKIBSSELSKABET “VENDILA”, v. THE UNITED STATES
[No. 50447]
[No. 50448]
[No. 50463]
[No. 50464]
[No. 50465]
[No. 50466]
[Decided July 12, 1955]
Plaintiffs’ petitions for writ of certiorari dismissed by the Supreme Court on motion of the parties March 2, 1956.

Opinion:
Following the opinion in Aktieselskabet Dampskibsselskabet Svendborg v. United States, 131 C. Cls. 399, and on defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiffs' first cause of action in all the cases and to dismiss the second cause of action in Cases Nos. 50463 to 50466, an opinion per curiam was filed in the cases named above as follows:
Per curiam:
These cases are before tbe court on defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiffs' first cause of action.
The issues are the same as those in the case of Aktieselskabet Dampskibsselskabet Svendborg v. United States, No. 50446, 131 C. Cls. 399; that is to say, whether or not the con tract agreed upon by tlie parties was accepted in settlement of plaintiffs' claims for just compensation. In the Svendborg case we held that it was, and upon the basis of the decision in that case plaintiff's first cause of action in these cases are dismissed.
In cases Nos. 50463 to 50466, defendant also moves to dismiss plaintiffs' second cause of action, which also alleges the right to recover just compensation unlimited by the subsequent contracts, which we have held was in settlement of plaintiffs' claims for just compensation.
For the reasons stated, plaintiffs' second cause of action in cases Nos. 50463 to 50466 is also dismissed.
It is so ordered.