Case Name: Tuttle et al. v. Baker; Same v. Easterly; Same v. Lingerfelter; Same v. Martin; Same v. Phillips; Same v. Stady; Same v. Starks; Same v. Wright
Court: United States Circuit Court for the Northern District of New York
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1888-01-11
Citations: 33 F. 352
Docket Number: 
Parties: Tuttle et al. v. Baker. Same v. Easterly. Same v. Lingerfelter. Same v. Martin. Same v. Phillips. Same v. Stady. Same v. Starks. Same v. Wright.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter
Volume: 33
Pages: 352–352

Head Matter:
Tuttle et al. v. Baker. Same v. Easterly. Same v. Lingerfelter. Same v. Martin. Same v. Phillips. Same v. Stady. Same v. Starks. Same v. Wright.
(Circuit Court, N. D. New York.
January 11, 1888.)
Charles II. Buell, for complainants.
Baniel B. Benton, for defendant.

Opinion:
Coxe, J.
Counsel having stipulated that these causes should abide the event of the action against Sylvester .Garver, and the court having directed a decree for the complainants in that cause, it follows that a similar decree should be entered in each of the above-entitled actions.