Case Name: N. Harris v. Elijah Vanarsdall
Court: Kentucky Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Kentucky
Decision Date: 1869-06-05
Citations: 3 Ky. Op. 630
Docket Number: 
Parties: N. Harris v. Elijah Vanarsdall.
Judges: 
Reporter: Kentucky Opinions, containing the unreported opinions of the Court of Appeals
Volume: 3
Pages: 630–631

Head Matter:
N. Harris v. Elijah Vanarsdall.
Executions — Sale Under Different Executions — Motion to Quash — Necessary-Parties.
Where a sale is made under different executions, all the parties to be affected by a motion to quash the sale should be notified of the motion and the irregularity of restricting the notice to the parties to the separate executions is not cured by an order of consolidation, as the purchaser of the equity of redemption was a necessary party.
APPEAL FROM MERCER CIRCUIT COURT.
June 5, 1869.
Thompson & Kellar, for appellant.
Hardin, for appellee.

Opinion:
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Hardin:
This court has decided recently, in several cases from the same court from which this appeal is prosecuted, that where a sale is made under different executions, all the parties to be affected by a motion to quash the sale should be notified of the motion, and we do not perceive that the irregularity of restricting the notice to the parties to. the separate executions, was cured in these cases, by the order of consolidation. But be this as it may, as it appears that Hutcheson the purchaser of the equity or redemption of the land, was an interested party and not brought before the court, it seems to us the motion was properly dismissed. But as the proper parties were not before .the court we do not regard the order of dismission as a bar to another proceeding for the same purpose.
"Wherefore the judgment is affirmed.