Case Name: Samuel D. ROSS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1997-02-25
Citations: 939 S.W.2d 57
Docket Number: No. 71016
Parties: Samuel D. ROSS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 939
Pages: 57–58

Head Matter:
Samuel D. ROSS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. 71016.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Feb. 25, 1997.
Dave Hemingway, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for movanl/appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Breck K. Burgess, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent/respondent.
Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant appeals the dismissal, without an. evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant pled guilty to one count of first degree tampering, § 569.080, RSMo 1994, and the court sentenced him to a five year prison term. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no prece-dential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. Rule 84.16(b).