Case Name: In the Matter of Jane Ramos, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Enrolled Members of the Democratic Party Similarly Situated, Appellant, v. Howard Alpert et al., as Commissioners of the Board of Elections of the County of Albany, Respondents. Daniel O'Connell, as Chairman of the Democratic Party of Albany County, et al., Intervenors-Appellants; Joseph C. Frangella, as Chairman of the Republican Party of Albany County, Intervenor-Appellant. (And Two Other Proceedings.)
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1973-06-01
Citations: 32 N.Y.2d 903
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Jane Ramos, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Enrolled Members of the Democratic Party Similarly Situated, Appellant, v. Howard Alpert et al., as Commissioners of the Board of Elections of the County of Albany, Respondents. Daniel O’Connell, as Chairman of the Democratic Party of Albany County, et al., Intervenors-Appellants; Joseph C. Frangella, as Chairman of the Republican Party of Albany County, Intervenor-Appellant. (And Two Other Proceedings.)
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 32
Pages: 903–904

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Jane Ramos, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Enrolled Members of the Democratic Party Similarly Situated, Appellant, v. Howard Alpert et al., as Commissioners of the Board of Elections of the County of Albany, Respondents. Daniel O’Connell, as Chairman of the Democratic Party of Albany County, et al., Intervenors-Appellants; Joseph C. Frangella, as Chairman of the Republican Party of Albany County, Intervenor-Appellant. (And Two Other Proceedings.)
Argued June 1, 1973;
decided June 1, 1973.
Michael Feit for Jane Ramos and David Sawyer, appellants.
Evariste G. Lavigne, Jr. for Daniel O’Connell and others, intervenors-appellants.
John W. Tabner for Joseph C. Frangella, intervenor-appellant.
Condon A. Lyons, County Attorney, for respondents.

Opinion:
On both the main appeal and the cross appeals: Order affirmed, without costs, in the following memorandum: We affirm the order of the Appellate Division. Under the uncertainty of the primary procedures and the exigencies of the political calendar, it was appropriate for that court, in the interests of substantial justice, to direct a write-in primary to remedy the concededly late filing of the designating petitions filed with the Board of Elections on May 16.
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones and Wachtler. Judge Burke dissents and votes to reverse in the following memorandum: When the courts below held that there were 16 vacancies in the designation for Democratic Alderman under section 131 (subd. 7) of the Election Law, the holding of a primary was precluded. The vacancies must be filled by a majority vote of a quorum of the County Committee after primary day. The Appellate Division could not usurp the power of the County Committee. Taking no part: Judge Breitel.