Case Name: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Chaka MATTHEW, Petitioner
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2005-09-13
Citations: 884 A.2d 248
Docket Number: 
Parties: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Chaka MATTHEW, Petitioner.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 884
Pages: 248–248

Head Matter:
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Chaka MATTHEW, Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Sept. 13, 2005.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
AND NOW, this 13th day of September, 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, LIMITED to the following issue:
Whether the Commonwealth offered sufficient evidence to convict Petitioner of aggravated assault, graded as a felony of the first degree. In doing so, discuss the competing approaches contained in Commonwealth v. Mayo, 272 Pa.Super. 115, 414 A.2d 696 (1979) and Commonwealth v. Gruff, 822 A.2d 773 (Pa.Super.2003) and which approach, or other approach, should be adopted as the law of the Commonwealth with respect to this issue.