Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clarence Lee BASSETT, Jr., a/k/a Junie, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-06-29
Citations: 328 F. App'x 217
Docket Number: No. 09-6002
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Clarence Lee BASSETT, Jr., a/k/a Junie, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 328
Pages: 217–218

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Clarence Lee BASSETT, Jr., a/k/a Junie, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 09-6002.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 22, 2009.
Decided: June 29, 2009.
Clarence Lee Bassett, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Rae McKeel, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Clarence Bassett, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a judicial inquiry and seeking an evidentiary hearing on the Government's refusal to file a Fed.R.Crim.P. 35 motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Bassett, No. 4:03-cr-00069-RGD-TEM-1 (E.D.Va. Dec. 5, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.