Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lloyd Anthonie WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-04-28
Citations: 600 F. App'x 186
Docket Number: No. 15-6291
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lloyd Anthonie WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 600
Pages: 186–187

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lloyd Anthonie WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-6291.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 23, 2015.
Decided: April 28, 2015.
Lloyd Anthonie Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Corey F. Ellis, Office of the United States Attorney, Asheville, NC, for Appel-lee.
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Lloyd Anthonie Williams appeals the district court's order denying his motion to reconsider the court's earlier order deny ing his "Petition for Resentencing," in which Williams sought relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. A district court lacks authority to grant a motion to reconsider its ruling on a § 3582(c)(2) motion. United States v. Go-odwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 234 (4th Cir.2010).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order denying Williams' motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.