Case Name: Myra Vaughn, Respondent, v. City of New York, Respondent, and Empire City Subway Company (Limited), Appellant, et al., Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2004-03-04
Citations: 5 A.D.3d 151
Docket Number: 
Parties: Myra Vaughn, Respondent, v City of New York, Respondent, and Empire City Subway Company (Limited), Appellant, et al., Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 5
Pages: 151–151

Head Matter:
Myra Vaughn, Respondent, v City of New York, Respondent, and Empire City Subway Company (Limited), Appellant, et al., Defendants.
[772 NYS2d 514]

Opinion:
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Stallman, J.), entered January 14, 2003, which, in an action for personal injuries allegedly caused by a street defect, insofar as appealed from, denied defendant-appellant contractor's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Defendant-respondent City's evidence shows that it issued appellant three permits to work in the vicinity of the accident site, only two of which are addressed by appellant. Thus, issues of fact exist as to, inter alia, whether a third permit was issued, and, if so, the location of any work performed pursuant thereto. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Friedman, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.