Case Name: In re: Gary Ivan TERRY, Debtor. Gary Ivan Terry, Debtor-Appellant, v. Anita Jo Troxler, Trustee-Appellee; In re: Gary Ivan Terry, Debtor. Gary Ivan Terry, Debtor-Appellant, v. Anita Jo Troxler, Trustee-Appellee, Romallus O. Murphy; Michael D. West, Movants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-04-05
Citations: 174 F. App'x 176
Docket Number: Nos. 05-1436, 05-1437, 05-1438
Parties: In re: Gary Ivan TERRY, Debtor. Gary Ivan Terry, Debtor—Appellant, v. Anita Jo Troxler, Trustee—Appellee, In re: Gary Ivan Terry, Debtor. Gary Ivan Terry, Debtor—Appellant, v. Anita Jo Troxler, Trustee—Appellee, Romallus O. Murphy; Michael D. West, Movants.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Bankruptcy Reporter
Volume: 343
Pages: 176–176

Head Matter:
In re: Gary Ivan TERRY, Debtor. Gary Ivan Terry, Debtor—Appellant, v. Anita Jo Troxler, Trustee—Appellee, In re: Gary Ivan Terry, Debtor. Gary Ivan Terry, Debtor—Appellant, v. Anita Jo Troxler, Trustee—Appellee, Romallus O. Murphy; Michael D. West, Movants.
Nos. 05-1436, 05-1437, 05-1438.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 30, 2006.
Decided: April 5, 2006.
Gary Ivan Terry, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer Rebecca Harris, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Gary Ivan Terry seeks to appeal from the district court's order dismissing his appeals from the bankruptcy court's orders denying his motions to reopen his Chapter 13 bankruptcy case, and denying his motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauper-is and dismiss the appeals for the reasons stated by the district court. See Terry v. Troxler, 328 B.R. 460 (M.D.N.C. 2005; entered Mar. 31, 2005). Additionally, we deny Terry's motions for appointment of counsel and for expedited oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED