Case Name: Jorge ORTEGA-LOZANO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2006-02-17
Citations: 920 So. 2d 809
Docket Number: No. 2D05-1275
Parties: Jorge ORTEGA-LOZANO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: CASANUEVA, SALCINES, and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 920
Pages: 809–809

Head Matter:
Jorge ORTEGA-LOZANO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D05-1275.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Feb. 17, 2006.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Jorge Ortega-Lozano challenges the trial court's order summarily denying, as untimely, his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Although we conclude that Ortega-Lozano's motion was timely filed, see Chagoya v. State, 817 So.2d 1039 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), we affirm the denial order because Ortega-Lozano cannot demonstrate prejudice.
See Pena v. State, 837 So.2d 495 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Prieto v. State, 824 So.2d 924 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002).
Affirmed.
CASANUEVA, SALCINES, and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.