Case Name: BRINKLEY v. NAUGHTON et al.
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1900-11-27
Citations: 67 N.Y.S. 83
Docket Number: 
Parties: BRINKLEY v. NAUGHTON et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 67
Pages: 83–83

Head Matter:
BRINKLEY v. NAUGHTON et al.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
November 27, 1900.)
Appeal—Judgment—Conoltjsiveness.
A judgment on conflicting evidence will not be disturbed on appeal.
Appeal from municipal court, borough of Manhattan, Tenth district.
Action by Robert G. Brinkley against Bernard Naughton and others. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendants appeal.
Affirmed.
Argued before BEEKMAN, P. J., and GIEGERICH and O’GORMAN, JJ.
Thomas C. O’Sullivan, for appellants.
Elmer E. Cooley, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
No question of law being presented by the record, and the judgment having been rendered on conflicting evidence, there must be an affirmance.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.