Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. CHARLES HENRY LOTT, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1992-02-12
Citations: 111 Or. App. 394
Docket Number: C90-04-32163; CA A67071
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. CHARLES HENRY LOTT, Appellant.
Judges: Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Deits and Durham, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 111
Pages: 394–395

Head Matter:
Submited on record and appellant’s brief December 19, 1991,
convictions affirmed and remanded for resentencing February 12, 1992
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. CHARLES HENRY LOTT, Appellant.
(C90-04-32163; CA A67071)
823 P2d 1041
Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, and Steven V. Humber, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, filed the brief for appellant.
No appearance for respondent.
Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Deits and Durham, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant was convicted of possession and delivery of controlled substances as part of a drug cultivation, manufacture or delivery scheme or network. He demurred to the indictment on the ground that the scheme or network language is unconstitutionally vague. However, on appeal, he challenges only the sentence imposed. The state concedes, by letter, that the sentence is improper. State v. Moeller, 105 Or App 434, 806 P2d 130, rev dismissed 312 Or 76, 815 P2d 701 (1991). We accept that concession.
Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing.