Case Name: Moses Tannenbaum, Respondent, v. Simon Natchtigall, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1899-10
Citations: 29 Misc. 759
Docket Number: 
Parties: Moses Tannenbaum, Respondent, v. Simon Natchtigall, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 29
Pages: 759–760

Head Matter:
Moses Tannenbaum, Respondent, v. Simon Natchtigall, Appellant.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff in the Municipal Court, tenth district, borough of Manhattan.
Wm. Klingenstein, for appellant.
Benno Loewy, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Ouriam.
The record fails to show that the defendant is a resident within the jurisdiction of the Municipal Court, and it has been repeatedly held that all the facts necessary to give an inferior court jurisdiction must appear in the record (Frees v. Ford, 6 N. Y. 176; Gilbert v. York, 111 id. 544) and that to all such courts the rule necessarily applies, that their jurisdiction must appear and no presumption can be invoked in their favor. Tyroler v. Gummersbach, 28 Misc. Rep. 151.
Present: Freedman, P. J.; MacLean and Leventritt, JJ.
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.