Case Name: CABLE HOLDINGS OF GEORGIA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. McNEIL REAL ESTATE FUND VI, LTD., Woodsong Apartments d/b/a Lakes Apartments, Robert A. McNeil Corporation, ODC Communications Corporation, Woodsong Associates, Ltd., Defendants-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1993-03-23
Citations: 988 F.2d 1071
Docket Number: No. 91-8032
Parties: CABLE HOLDINGS OF GEORGIA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. McNEIL REAL ESTATE FUND VI, LTD., Woodsong Apartments d/b/a Lakes Apartments, Robert A. McNeil Corporation, ODC Communications Corporation, Woodsong Associates, Ltd., Defendants-Appellants.
Judges: Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, and CARNES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 988
Pages: 1071–1082

Head Matter:
CABLE HOLDINGS OF GEORGIA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. McNEIL REAL ESTATE FUND VI, LTD., Woodsong Apartments d/b/a Lakes Apartments, Robert A. McNeil Corporation, ODC Communications Corporation, Woodsong Associates, Ltd., Defendants-Appellants.
No. 91-8032.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
March 23, 1993.
Deborah C. Costlow, Thomas C. Power, Winston & Strawn, Washington, DC, for defendants-appellants.
Peter Crane Canfield, Dow Lohnes & Al-bertson, Atlanta, GA, Howard Graff, Neal S. Barlia, Baer Marks & Upham, New York City, for plaintiff-appellee.
Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, and CARNES, Circuit Judges.
Judge Black recused herself and did not participate in this decision.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
On April 9, 1992, through clerical error, an order issued denying appellee's petition for rehearing and suggestion of rehearing en banc. The order was issued in error because the mandate had been withheld and the court had not yet been polled on the suggestion of rehearing en banc. A poll now having been conducted at the request of a member of this court in active service on the reconsideration of this case en banc, and a majority of the judges in active service not having voted in favor of it; the appellee's petition for rehearing and suggestion of rehearing en banc is DENIED.