Case Name: STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Gerardo HERNANDEZ, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-10-09
Citations: 587 So. 2d 1171
Docket Number: No. 91-0510
Parties: STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Gerardo HERNANDEZ, Appellee.
Judges: DELL, GARRETT and FARMER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 587
Pages: 1171–1171

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Gerardo HERNANDEZ, Appellee.
No. 91-0510.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Oct. 9, 1991.
Rehearing Denied Nov. 20, 1991.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Dawn S. Wynn, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Glenn H. Mitchell, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. The record reveals that the police activity conducted by the confidential informant did not have as its end the interruption of a specific ongoing criminal activity. See State v. Hunter, 586 So.2d 319, 320 (Fla.1991); Cruz v. State, 465 So.2d 516 (Fla.), cert. denied, 473 U.S. 905, 105 S.Ct. 3527, 87 L.Ed.2d 652 (1985). Appellant's past criminal activity had ceased by the time the confidential informant first made contact with him.
DELL, GARRETT and FARMER, JJ., concur.