Case Name: Paul Schwartz, Appellant, v. Macrose Lumber & Trim Co., Inc., et al., Respondents-Appellants. Wilmod Company, Inc., Defendant-Respondent and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Nissho American Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent-Appellant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1960-04-10
Citations: 24 N.Y.2d 856
Docket Number: 
Parties: Paul Schwartz, Appellant, v. Macrose Lumber & Trim Co., Inc., et al., Respondents-Appellants. Wilmod Company, Inc., Defendant-Respondent and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Nissho American Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 24
Pages: 856–858

Head Matter:
Paul Schwartz, Appellant, v. Macrose Lumber & Trim Co., Inc., et al., Respondents-Appellants. Wilmod Company, Inc., Defendant-Respondent and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Nissho American Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent-Appellant.
Argued January 8, 1969;
decided April 10, 1960.
Samuel G. Rabinor, Sidney H. Bishop and Albert S. Dranoff for plaintiff-appellant.
Walter Feller and E. Edan Spencer for respondentsappellants.
Michael I. Begun, Murray H. Paloger and Henry B. Raff for third-party defendant-respondent-appellant.
Roger G. McTiernan and Michael R. Treanor for defendant-respondent and third-party plaintiff-appellant.

Opinion:
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan and Jasen. ' Judges Keating and Breitel dissent and vote to reverse for the reasons stated in the opinion at Trial Term, but to grant a new trial.