Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marcus Nikita JENNINGS, a/k/a Marcus Jennings, a/k/a Marc Jennings, a/k/a Mark Jennings, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-06-06
Citations: 474 F. App'x 119
Docket Number: No. 12-6434
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marcus Nikita JENNINGS, a/k/a Marcus Jennings, a/k/a Marc Jennings, a/k/a Mark Jennings, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 474
Pages: 119–119

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marcus Nikita JENNINGS, a/k/a Marcus Jennings, a/k/a Marc Jennings, a/k/a Mark Jennings, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-6434.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 31, 2012.
Decided: June 6, 2012.
Marcus Nikita Jennings, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Andrew Bassford, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Marcus Nikita Jennings appeals the district court's order denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Jennings, No. 6:06-cr-00004-NKM-1 (W.D.Va. Feb. 29, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.