Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Oscar FELIX-RIVERA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-09-18
Citations: 46 F. App'x 519
Docket Number: No. 01-10643; D.C. No. CR-99-00111-ROS
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Oscar FELIX-RIVERA, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 46
Pages: 519–520

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Oscar FELIX-RIVERA, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 01-10643.
D.C. No. CR-99-00111-ROS.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 9, 2002.
Decided Sept. 18, 2002.
Before HUG, O’SCANNLAIN, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Oscar Felix-Rivera appeals the district court's order revoking his supervised release and imposing sentence. Felix-Rivera's attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and a motion to withdraw on the ground that there is no issue that could arguably support an appeal. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346,102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable issues. Counsel's motion to withdraw is therefore GRANTED and the revocation order is
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.