Case Name: MOSBY & RUSSELL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC., Appellant, v. HUDSON COMPANY OF FLORIDA and Shell Oil Company, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1974-08-30
Citations: 299 So. 2d 53
Docket Number: No. 74-121
Parties: MOSBY & RUSSELL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC., Appellant, v. HUDSON COMPANY OF FLORIDA and Shell Oil Company, Appellees.
Judges: OWEN, C. J., and WALDEN and CROSS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 299
Pages: 53–53

Head Matter:
MOSBY & RUSSELL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC., Appellant, v. HUDSON COMPANY OF FLORIDA and Shell Oil Company, Appellees.
No. 74-121.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Aug. 30, 1974.
Daniel E. Scott, Dillon & Scott, Sarasota, for appellant.
Robert B. White, Jr., Best & Sears, Orlando, for appellee-Hudson. .
William B. Wilson, Maguire, Voorhis & Wells, Orlando, for appellee-Shell.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion of appellant-third party defendant to dismiss on the grounds of improper venue. See, Dorr-Oliver, Inc. v. Linder Industrial Machinery Company, Fla.App.1972, 263 So.2d 237; United States v. Acord, 10 Cir. 1954, 209 F.2d 709, cert. denied, 347 U.S. 975, 74 S.Ct. 786, 98 L.Ed. 1115; McGrath v. Lund's Fisheries, D.Del.1959, 170 F. Supp. 173; 6 Wright and Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure, Section 1445 (1971); 3 Moore, Federal Practice, Section 14.28(2), (2nd ed. 1974).
Affirmed.
OWEN, C. J., and WALDEN and CROSS, JJ., concur.