Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kolen Kalani KAIMANA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-03-08
Citations: 678 F. App'x 780
Docket Number: No. 16-1328
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kolen Kalani KAIMANA, Defendant-Appellant,
Judges: Before MATHESON, BACHARACH, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 678
Pages: 780–780

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kolen Kalani KAIMANA, Defendant-Appellant,
No. 16-1328
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
Filed March 8, 2017
Robert M. Brown, Paul Farley, Office of the United States Attorney, District of Colorado, Denver, CO, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee
Meredith B. Esser, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Districts of Colorado and Wyoming, Denver, CO, for Defendant-Appellant
Before MATHESON, BACHARACH, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER AND JUDGMENT
Per Curiam
This matter is before us on Appellee's Unopposed Motion for Summary Affirmance. The United States moves for summary affirmance of the district court's sentencing determination in this case in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Beckles v. United States, — U.S.-, 137 S.Ct. 886, 197 L.Ed.2d 145, 2017 WL 855781 (March 6, 2017). Appellant Kolen Kalani Kaimana does not oppose the motion.
Upon consideration, the motion is granted. The judgment of the district court is affirmed. The mandate shall issue forthwith.
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.