Case Name: U.S. Bank Natl. Assn. v. Gullotta
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2007-08-29
Citations: 114 Ohio St. 3d 1504
Docket Number: 2007-1144
Parties: U.S. Bank Natl. Assn. v. Gullotta.
Judges: Lanzinger and Cupp, JJ., dissent.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 114
Pages: 1504–1504

Head Matter:
2007-1144.
U.S. Bank Natl. Assn. v. Gullotta.

Opinion:
Stark App. No. 2006CA00145, 2007-Ohio-2085. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 2 of the court of appeals' Judgment Entry file June 6, 2007:
"Whether or not each missed payment under a promissory note and mortgage yields a new claim such that any successive actions on the same note and mortgage involve different claims and are thus exempt from the 'two-dismissal rule' contained in Civ.R. 41(A)(1)."
Lanzinger and Cupp, JJ., dissent.
The conflict case is EMC Mtge. Corp. v. Jenkins, 164 Ohio App.3d 240, 2005-Ohio-5799.