Case Name: Judith GIBBONS and Philip Gibbons, Appellants, v. Dock SHOCKLEY et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1976-11-02
Citations: 338 So. 2d 1136
Docket Number: No. 75-1879
Parties: Judith GIBBONS and Philip Gibbons, Appellants, v. Dock SHOCKLEY et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 338
Pages: 1136–1137

Head Matter:
Judith GIBBONS and Philip Gibbons, Appellants, v. Dock SHOCKLEY et al., Appellees.
No. 75-1879.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 2, 1976.
Rehearing Denied Nov. 23, 1976.
Gerald M. Walsh & Associates and Richard D. Heller and David' L. Kahn, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.
Fowler, White, Burnett, Hurley, Banick & Knight and Thomas F. Martin, Miami, for appellees.
Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This appeal by the plaintiff is from a final judgment based on a jury verdict for one of several defendants in a personal injury action. The point argued is that the trial court erred in denying the plaintiffs motion for a new trial because of an allegedly erroneous jury instruction and the failure to give one of plaintiff's requested instructions. A review of the record in the light of these arguments convinces us that no error appears. See Smith v. Johnson, 187 So.2d 655 (Fla.2d DCA 1966), and Scissors v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad, 311 So.2d 708 (Fla.3d DCA 1975).
Affirmed.