Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jamal H. ALFRED, a/k/a Joshua Al Hall, a/k/a JA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-12-22
Citations: 672 F. App'x 268
Docket Number: No. 16-7163
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jamal H. ALFRED, a/k/a Joshua Al Hall, a/k/a JA, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 672
Pages: 268–268

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jamal H. ALFRED, a/k/a Joshua Al Hall, a/k/a JA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-7163
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: December 20, 2016
Decided: December 22, 2016
Jamal H. Alfred, Appellant. Pro Se. Thomas A O’Malley, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jamal H. Alfred appeals from the district court's order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. United States v. Alfred, No. 3:03-cr-00017-GCM-1 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 16, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Although the district court granted Alfred's § 3582(c)(2) motion, the reduction granted by the court did not reduce Alfred's sentence to the full extent he requested.