Case Name: MENA TRINKLE, RESPONDENT, v. FREDERICK W. DONNELLY ET AL., THE POLICE AND FIRE PENSION COMMISSION OF TRENTON, N. J., APPELLANTS
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1923-04-20
Citations: 98 N.J.L. 908
Docket Number: 
Parties: MENA TRINKLE, RESPONDENT, v. FREDERICK W. DONNELLY ET AL., THE POLICE AND FIRE PENSION COMMISSION OF TRENTON, N. J., APPELLANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 98
Pages: 908–908

Head Matter:
MENA TRINKLE, RESPONDENT, v. FREDERICK W. DONNELLY ET AL., THE POLICE AND FIRE PENSION COMMISSION OF TRENTON, N. J., APPELLANTS.
Submitted March 26, 1923
Decided April 20, 1923.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, in which the following per curiam was filed:
‘"This case is similar in all respects to that of Van Horn v. Donnelly et ah, decided at this term, and is controlled by that decision.
“A peremptory writ of mandamus will issue.”
For the appellants, Katzenbach & Hunt.
For the respondent, Henry M. Hartman.

Opinion:
Pee Cukiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Chief Justice, Sayayze, Parker, Kalisch, Black, 'Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.