Case Name: HAIR v. THE STATE
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1923-11-15
Citations: 31 Ga. App. 177
Docket Number: 14939
Parties: HAIR v. THE STATE.
Judges: Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 31
Pages: 177–177

Head Matter:
14939.
HAIR v. THE STATE.
There was sufficient evidence to authorize the conviction.
Decided November 15, 1923.
Accusation of carrying concealed pistol; from city court of Black-shear—Judge Mitchell. July 14, 1923.
Eldon L. Bowen, for plaintiff in error.
B. Thomas Memory, solicitor, contra.

Opinion:
Luke, J.
The defendant was convicted of carrying a concealed weapon. His motion for a new trial, which was based upon the general grounds only, was overruled. The evidence was in conflict, but the jury believed, as they had a right to do, the evidence of the State, which authorized the defendant's conviction. The trial judge approved the verdict. The motion for a new trial was properly overruled.
Judgment affirmed.
Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.