Case Name: Jim Foreman v. The State
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1930-04-16
Citations: 115 Tex. Crim. 179
Docket Number: No. 13252
Parties: Jim Foreman v. The State.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Criminal Reports
Volume: 115
Pages: 179–180

Head Matter:
Jim Foreman v. The State.
No. 13252.
Delivered April 16, 1930.
Rehearing denied June 4, 1930.
Reported in 28 S. W. (2d) 560.
The opinion states the case.
L. W. Shepperd and Wm. Kennedy, both of Groesbeck, for appellant.
A. A. Dawson, State’s Attorney, of Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
LATTIMORE, Judge.
The conviction is for the manufacture of intoxicating liquor; punishment, two years in the penitentiary.
The facts in the case amply support the judgment. The only bill of exception in the record complains of the overruling of the motion for new trial. Said motion sets up no error other than those alleged to have occurred during the trial. No matters of misconduct or newly discovered evidence or anything of that kind were alleged. The testimony need not be set out.
The judgment will be affirmed.
Affirmed.