Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. German XINGU-GUTIERREZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-08-22
Citations: 247 F. App'x 66
Docket Number: No. 06-30216
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. German XINGU-GUTIERREZ, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: KLEINFELD, SILVERMAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 247
Pages: 66–67

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. German XINGU-GUTIERREZ, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 06-30216.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 13, 2007.
Filed Aug. 22, 2007.
Helen J. Brunner, Esq., Annette L. Hayes, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
William T. Hines, Esq., Seattle, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: KLEINFELD, SILVERMAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
German Xingu-Gutierrez appeals from the 23-month and one-week sentence im posed following his guilty-plea conviction for unlawful entry by eluding examination and inspection by immigration officers, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(2). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Xingu-Gutierrez contends that the district court erred by not articulating on the record its consideration of the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Because the record reflects that Xingu-Gutierrez and the government agreed upon a proposed sentence, and the district court set forth "a reasoned basis" for the sentence, we conclude that the district court did not err. See Rita v. United States, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 2468, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.