Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Rosa MONTOYA, Silvio Antonia Santana, Defendants, Edgar Vinasco, Isaac Vinasco, Defendant-Appellants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-01-05
Citations: 84 F. App'x 139
Docket Number: No. 02-1723
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Rosa MONTOYA, Silvio Antonia Santana, Defendants, Edgar Vinasco, Isaac Vinasco, Defendant-Appellants.
Judges: Present: WALKER, Chief Judge, OAKES, and KATZMANN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 84
Pages: 139–140

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Rosa MONTOYA, Silvio Antonia Santana, Defendants, Edgar Vinasco, Isaac Vinasco, Defendant-Appellants.
No. 02-1723.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Jan. 5, 2004.
B. Alan Seidler, Nyack, NY, for Appellant Edgar Vinasco.
Marjorie M. Smith, Tappan, NY, for Appellant Isaac Vinasco.
Roberto Finzi, Assistant United States Attorney (James B. Comey, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, and Celeste L. Koeleveld, Assistant United States Attorney, on the brief), New York, NY, for Appellee.
Present: WALKER, Chief Judge, OAKES, and KATZMANN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
SUMMARY ORDER
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the appeal is DISMISSED.
Defendant-appellant Edgar Vinasco appeals from a judgment of conviction entered against him on November 21, 2002 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Denise L. Cote, Judge). Specifically, Vinasco appeals the district court's decision to impose a sentence of 87 months' imprisonment without first granting Vinasco 35 days to review the final pre-sentence report, as required by the former Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(b)(6) (which is now Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(e)(2)).
However, Vinasco's appeal is foreclosed by his plea agreement, in which he expressly waived his right to appeal any sentence within or below a stipulated guidelines range of 87 to 108 months' imprisonment. A22. Absent a showing of "extraordinary circumstances," a waiver of a defendant's right to appeal must be enforced. See United States v. Yemitan, 70 F.3d 746, 748 (2d Cir.1995). No such extraordinary circumstances having been alleged here, the appeal must be dismissed.
For the reasons set forth above, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.
The Government has also moved for summary affirmance of the conviction of Edgar Vinasco's brother, Isaac Vinasco. That motion and Marjorie M. Smith's motion to be relieved as counsel for Isaac Vinasco pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396,18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), are hereby GRANTED.