Case Name: Jose Beth OTIS, Appellant, v. Bernard A. WIEDER, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1966-02-01
Citations: 183 So. 2d 235
Docket Number: No. 65-410
Parties: Jose Beth OTIS, Appellant, v. Bernard A. WIEDER, Appellee.
Judges: Before TILLMAN PEARSON, CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 183
Pages: 235–236

Head Matter:
Jose Beth OTIS, Appellant, v. Bernard A. WIEDER, Appellee.
No. 65-410.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
Feb. 1, 1966.
Rehearing Denied March 9, 1966.
Ungerleider & Segor, Miami Beach, for appellant.
Jack Burris, Miami Beach, for appellee.
Before TILLMAN PEARSON, CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The order of the trial judge dismissing appellant's counterclaim, for failure to state a cause of action, is affirmed upon authority of Raphael v. Koretzky, Fla.App.1958, 102 So.2d 746. See also Weekley v. Knight, 116 Fla. 721, 156 So. 625 (1934); Suritz v. Kelner, Fla.App.1963, 155 So.2d 831; Campbell v. Magana, 184 Cal.App.2d 751, 8 Cal.Rptr. 32 (1960); and anno., 45 A.L.R.2d 5.
Appellant's contention that she was deprived of an opportunity to amend her counterclaim is conclusively refuted by the record.
Affirmed.