Case Name: Andrew P. Koeszegi, Inc., Appellant, v. Robert E. Kizer and Another, Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1935-06
Citations: 245 A.D. 701
Docket Number: 
Parties: Andrew P. Koeszegi, Inc., Appellant, v. Robert E. Kizer and Another, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 245
Pages: 701–701

Head Matter:
First Department,
June, 1935.
Andrew P. Koeszegi, Inc., Appellant, v. Robert E. Kizer and Another, Respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The testimony offered by the plaintiff tended to show that the Van Fleet order of November 19, 1929, procured through a party other than the defendant Sara J. Kizer, was improperly excluded.
The judgment so far as appealed from should, therefore, be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, unless the defendants stipulate to reduce the judgment as entered by the sum of $588.30, in which event the judgment as so modified is affirmed, without costs.
Present — Martin, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, O'Malley and Untermyer, JJ.
Judgment so far as appealed from reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, unless the defendants stipulate to reduce the judgment as entered by the sum of $588.30, in which event the judgment as so modified is affirmed, without costs. Settle order on notice.