Case Name: BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL. v. LEACH
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1919-03-10
Citations: 249 U.S. 217
Docket Number: No. 132
Parties: BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL. v. LEACH.
Judges: Mr. Justice Pitney and Mr. Justice Brandéis concur in the result.
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 249
Pages: 217–220

Head Matter:
BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL. v. LEACH.
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY.
No. 132.
Argued January 15, 16, 1919.
Decided March 10, 1919.
A stipulation in an interstate bill of lading conditioning the shipper's right to recover for loss or damage to live stock upon delivery of a verified claim in writing to a designated agent of the carrier within five days from the removal of the stock from the cars, held valid; and not waived; and not substituted by oral notice of the facts to the connecting carrier’s agent. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern By. Co. v. Starbird, 243 U. S. 592.
173 Kentucky, 452, reversed.
The case is stated in the opinion.
Mr. William W. -Crawford, with whom Mr. Alex. P. Humphrey, Mr. Edward P. Humphrey, Mr. Charles G. Middleton and Mr. Churchill Humphrey were on the briefs, for petitioners.
Mr. Frank W. Hackett, with whom Mr. B. M. Lee and Mr. John S. Blair were on the brief, for respondent.

Opinion:
Mr, Justice McReynolds
delivered the opinion of the court.
Respondent Leach sued the petitioners for damages sustained en route by cattle delivered at East St. Loui; Illinois, October 1, 1914, for shipment to Georgetown, Kentucky. In defense the carriers set up non-compliance with the following provision contained in bill of lading issued as required by act of Congress: "That no claim for damages which may accrue to the said shipper under this contract shall be allowed or paid by the said carrier, or sued for in any court by the said shipper, unless a claim for loss or damages shall be máde in writing verified by the affidavit of the shipper or his agent, and delivered to the General Freight Agent of said carrier at his office in Cincinnati, Ohio, within five days from the time said stock is removed from said car or cars, and that if any loss or damage occurs upon the line of connecting carrier, then such carrier shall not be liable unless a claim shall be made in like manner and delivered in like time, to some proper officer or agent of the carrier on whose line the loss or injury occurs." This averment was not denied; but the shipper replied that he promptly advised the railroad's agent at Georgetown of all essential facts and maintained that requirement in respect of written notice to general freight agent had been waived.
The point involved has been discussed in our recent opinions and we can find nothing which takes this case out of the rule requiring compliance with a provision in a bill of lading like the one above quoted. St. Louis, Iron Mt. & Southern Ry. Co. v. Starbird, 243 U. S. 592; Southern Pacific Co. v. Stewart, 248 U. S. 446.
The judgment below is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
Reversed and remanded.
Mr. Justice Pitney and Mr. Justice Brandéis concur in the result.