Case Name: Donna DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF REFUGIO, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-04-01
Citations: 124 F. App'x 293
Docket Number: No. 04-41109
Parties: Donna DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF REFUGIO, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 124
Pages: 293–294

Head Matter:
Donna DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF REFUGIO, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 04-41109.
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Decided April 1, 2005.
Donna Davis, Refugio, TX pro se.
Kevin D. Cullen, Cullen, Carsner, Seer-den & Cullen, Victoria, TX, for DefendantAppellee.
Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Donna Davis (hereinafter "Davis"), a Hispanic female, sued her employer, the County of Refugio (hereinafter "the County") in federal district court alleging that the County discriminated against her on the grounds of race when it decided to terminate her employment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The County filed an answer alleging that Davis was terminated for cause, i.e., insubordination and unsatisfactory performance; and after adequate time for discovery, the County filed a motion for summary judgement. The district court found that Davis had failed to present any evidence that the County's legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for termination of her employment was not believable; and the court further ruled that Davis did not set forth any evidence that race was a motivating factor in the decision to terminate her employment. The district court granted the County's motion for summary judgment and entered a final judgment accordingly. Davis appeals.
We have carefully reviewed the briefs, the record excerpts and relevant portions of the record. For the reasons stated by the district court in its Memorandum and Order filed under date of July 14, 2004, we affirm the final judgment dismissing Davis' claims with prejudice entered on July 14, 2004.
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.