Case Name: Earnest C. WOODS, II, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tom L. CAREY, Warden; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-01-18
Citations: 218 F. App'x 688
Docket Number: No. 06-15973
Parties: Earnest C. WOODS, II, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tom L. CAREY, Warden; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 218
Pages: 688–688

Head Matter:
Earnest C. WOODS, II, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tom L. CAREY, Warden; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 06-15973.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 16, 2007.
Filed Jan. 18, 2007.
Earnest C. Woods, II, Vacaville, CA, pro se.
Before: SILVERMAN, PAEZ and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
A review of the record, the opening brief, and appellant's response to this court's order to show cause, indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See Valdez v. Rosenbaum, 302 F.3d 1039 (9th Cir.2002) (rejecting claim of unlawful restriction on telephone access); Johnson v. California, 207 F.3d 650, 656 (9th Cir.2000) (stating that prisoners are not entitled to a specific rate for their telephone calls, in rejecting claim that prison officials conspired with telephone companies to overcharge inmates).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.