Case Name: In the Matter of Cowen & Company et al., Appellants, v. Jeffrey M. Anderson, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1989-11-02
Citations: 155 A.D.2d 243
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Cowen & Company et al., Appellants, v Jeffrey M. Anderson, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 155
Pages: 243–243

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Cowen & Company et al., Appellants, v Jeffrey M. Anderson, Respondent.

Opinion:
— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (David B. Saxe, J.), entered March 28, 1989, in this CPLR article 75 proceeding, denying a stay of arbitration, is unanimously affirmed, with costs.
The parties, the respondent customer demanding arbitration and the petitioners' stock broker and representative, agreed to arbitration "in accordance with the rules [of] the American Stock Exchange". The rules allow a customer to select arbitration before the American Arbitration Association. This was done, and nothing in the agreement between the parties limited the arbitration to the American Stock Exchange. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Carro, Asch, Kassal and Rosenberger, JJ.