Case Name: Harry Wax et al., Appellants, v. Beatrice Glaubman et al., as Executors of Reuben R. Sacks, Deceased, et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1957-02-04
Citations: 3 A.D.2d 714
Docket Number: 
Parties: Harry Wax et al., Appellants, v. Beatrice Glaubman et al., as Executors of Reuben R. Sacks, Deceased, et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 3
Pages: 714–714

Head Matter:
Harry Wax et al., Appellants, v. Beatrice Glaubman et al., as Executors of Reuben R. Sacks, Deceased, et al., Respondents.

Opinion:
Appeal from a judgment, entered upon a dismissal of the second amended complaint, as a consequence of the appellants' refusal, before and after the impanelling of the jury, to proceed to trial because of the lack of a witness. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Under the circumstances presented in the record, there was no abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court in refusing to grant appellants' request for an adjournment. Present—Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ.