Case Name: Robert JAMES, Appellant, v. Frank PLANO d/b/a Gulfstream Masonry and Milord Development Corporation, Appellees; MILORD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Frank PLANO d/b/a Gulfstream Masonry and Robert James, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1988-03-09
Citations: 520 So. 2d 709
Docket Number: Nos. 4-86-2400, 4-86-2465
Parties: Robert JAMES, Appellant, v. Frank PLANO d/b/a Gulfstream Masonry and Milord Development Corporation, Appellees. MILORD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Frank PLANO d/b/a Gulfstream Masonry and Robert James, Appellees.
Judges: ANSTEAD, GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 520
Pages: 709–710

Head Matter:
Robert JAMES, Appellant, v. Frank PLANO d/b/a Gulfstream Masonry and Milord Development Corporation, Appellees. MILORD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Frank PLANO d/b/a Gulfstream Masonry and Robert James, Appellees.
Nos. 4-86-2400, 4-86-2465.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
March 9, 1988.
Russell S. Bohn, of Edna L. Caruso, P.A., and Law Offices of Phillip C. Houston, West Palm Beach, for Robert James.
Charles R. Crispell and John J. Bulfin, of Wiederhold, Moses & Bulfin, P.A., West Palm Beach, for Milord Development.
Richard H. Gaunt, Jr., of Cibula, Gaunt, Pratt & Radford, West Palm Beach, for Frank Plano.

Opinion:
ON REHEARING
PER CURIAM.
We deny the appellee's motion for rehearing. However, we withdraw our opin ion of December 16, 1987, and substitute the following revised opinion:
On the authority of Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966), we reverse the summary final judgment and the resulting cost judgment entered in favor of the appellee, Frank Plano d/b/a Gulfstream Masonry (Plano), against the appellant Robert James (James). A genuine issue of material fact remains as to whether the wall that collapsed resulting in injury to James was negligently constructed by Plano. For this reason, the summary final judgment entered against Milord Development Corporation on its cross claim for contribution and common law indemnity is also reversed.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
ANSTEAD, GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., concur.