Case Name: Laidlaw Waste Sys., Inc. v. Consol. Rail Corp.
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1998-11-16
Citations: 84 Ohio St. 3d 1403
Docket Number: 98-1274
Parties: Laidlaw Waste Sys., Inc. v. Consol. Rail Corp.
Judges: 
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 84
Pages: 1403–1403

Head Matter:
Monday, November 16, 1998
MOTION DOCKET
98-1274.
Laidlaw Waste Sys., Inc. v. Consol. Rail Corp.

Opinion:
Certified State Law Question, No. C2980227. This cause came before the court on the certification of a state law question from the United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division. On November 12, 1998, petitioner filed a reply brief that was due November 2,1998, under S.Ct.Prac.R. XVIII(7). Whereas S.CtPrac.R. XIV(1)(C) prohibits the untimely filing of a brief,
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that petitioner's reply brief be, and hereby is, stricken.