Case Name: BALDAN IMPLEMENTOS AGRICOLAS, S.A., Appellant, v. AGRIDISC AND IMPLEMENTS CORPORATION, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-04-16
Citations: 578 So. 2d 390
Docket Number: No. 90-2472
Parties: BALDAN IMPLEMENTOS AGRICOLAS, S.A., Appellant, v. AGRIDISC AND IMPLEMENTS CORPORATION, Appellee.
Judges: Before FERGUSON, JORGENSON and GERSTEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 578
Pages: 390–391

Head Matter:
BALDAN IMPLEMENTOS AGRICOLAS, S.A., Appellant, v. AGRIDISC AND IMPLEMENTS CORPORATION, Appellee.
No. 90-2472.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 16, 1991.
Klayman & Associates, P.C., and Larry Klayman and Frederick J. Sujat, Washington, D.C., Manzini & Associates, P.A., and Nicolas A. Manzini, Miami, for appellant.
Harvey D. Rogers, Miami, for appellee.
Before FERGUSON, JORGENSON and GERSTEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Baldan appeals from a nonfinal order of partial summary judgment. We reverse.
Genuine issues of material fact on the issue of whether the appellee assigned its right to payment to Baldan precluded the entry of partial summary judgment in this case. Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966).
Accordingly, the partial summary judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.
Reversed and remanded.