Case Name: CITY OF BRECKENRIDGE HILLS, Defendant/Appellant, v. Timothy WALK, Plaintiff/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-05-30
Citations: 19 S.W.3d 700
Docket Number: No. ED 77109
Parties: CITY OF BRECKENRIDGE HILLS, Defendant/Appellant, v. Timothy WALK, Plaintiff/Respondent.
Judges: Before: GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J., PAUL J. SIMON, and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 19
Pages: 700–700

Head Matter:
CITY OF BRECKENRIDGE HILLS, Defendant/Appellant, v. Timothy WALK, Plaintiff/Respondent.
No. ED 77109.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
May 30, 2000.
Paul E. Martin, St. Louis, for appellant.
Timothy Walk, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before: GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J., PAUL J. SIMON, and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant, City of Breckenridge Hills, appeals the trial court's decision sustaining Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the princi-pies of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).