Case Name: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Schumann
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1994-12-07
Citations: 71 Ohio St. 3d 101
Docket Number: No. 94-1813
Parties: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Schumann.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 71
Pages: 101–102

Head Matter:
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Schumann.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Schumann (1994), 71 Ohio St.3d 101.]
(No. 94-1813
Submitted October 24, 1994
Decided December 7, 1994.)
Geoffrey Stem, Disciplinary Counsel, and Hamid F. Craig III, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.
William M. Schumann, pro se.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we agree with the board's findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.