Case Name: William R. Campbell et al, Appellants, v. Nassau County et al., Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1947-12-22
Citations: 273 A.D. 785
Docket Number: 
Parties: William R. Campbell et al, Appellants, v. Nassau County et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 273
Pages: 785–786

Head Matter:
William R. Campbell et al, Appellants, v. Nassau County et al., Respondents.

Opinion:
In an action to declare void certain resolutions and an ordinance made and passed by defendants, and to enjoin further steps thereunder, order granting defendants' motion, under rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice, for judgment on the pleadings, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Appeal from order denying plaintiffs' cross motion for examination of defendants before trial dismissed, without costs. Judgment on the pleadings was properly granted to defendants because section 1229 of the Nassau County Government Law (L. 1945, ch. 897) provides that the determination made by the ordinance ([sic] "order") may be reviewed- by a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, commenced within thirty days from the date of the adoption of the ordinance, and that the determination made by such ordinance shall be "final and conclusive" unless application is made for such review within such period of thirty days. The complaint alleges that the ordinance was adopted October 1, 1945. The complaint was verified June 18, 1947. This action in equity cannot be maintained, not only because the County Government Law provides that the method of review is by a proceeding under article 78, but because the determination made by the ordinance has become "final and conclusive". Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston and Sneed, JJ., concur; Adel, J., concurs, with the following memorandum: If section 1229 of the Nassau County Government Law (L. 1945, ch. 897, § 5) is properly read by substituting the word " ordinance " for the word " order " then this action in equity cannot be maintained. However, I am further of the opinion that it has been correctly held that the complaint and the annexed exhibits fail to state facts sufficient to apprise defendants of the respects in which it is claimed that the " plan, estimate and report " is incomplete or false or how such matters were concealed. It is claimed that the plan, estimate and report was incomplete in that it may not include the cost of the real estate to be acquired for the sewage disposal district and that it is false in that the estimates of costs made in 1945 were based upon 1940 prices. There are no facts alleged upon which to base these claims. The case of Staten Island Edison Corp. v. Maltbie (296 N. Y. 374) is inapplicable.