Case Name: James R. Willis et al., Respondents, v. Building Service Employees International Union, Local 262, Division 196 et al., Appellants
Court: Washington Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Washington
Decision Date: 1964-11-25
Citations: 65 Wash. 2d 947
Docket Number: No. 37363
Parties: James R. Willis et al., Respondents, v. Building Service Employees International Union, Local 262, Division 196 et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Washington Reports
Volume: 65
Pages: 947–947

Head Matter:
[No. 37363.
En Banc.
November 25, 1964.]
James R. Willis et al., Respondents, v. Building Service Employees International Union, Local 262, Division 196 et al., Appellants.
Gordon L. Walgren, for appellants.
Severyns & Moffett, for respondents.
Reported in 396 P. (2d) 884.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Appellants appeal from an order enjoining them from picketing respondents' place of business. Appellants' counsel concedes that if the findings of fact entered by the trial court find substantial support in the evidence the appeal fails. Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc., 54 Wn. (2d) 570, 343 P. (2d) 183 (1959). No question of law is presented or urged.
We have carefully reviewed the testimony contained in the statement of facts. While there is testimony supporting the contentions of both sides, the trial court accepted the testimony presented by respondents which, in turn, supports the findings of fact to which error is assigned. Since we do not retry disputed issues of fact upon appeal, the judgment of the trial court must be affirmed.
Respondents will recover their costs.