Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wade Brooks BEST, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-02-08
Citations: 28 F. App'x 303
Docket Number: No. 01-7624
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wade Brooks BEST, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 28
Pages: 303–303

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wade Brooks BEST, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 01-7624.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 31, 2002.
Decided Feb. 8, 2002.
Wade Brooks Best, Jr., Pro Se. J. Frank Bradsher, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Wade Brooks Best, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Best, Nos. CR-95-62-FO; CA-01-98-4-FO (E.D.N.C. July 10, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.