Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark J. WRIGHT, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-02-03
Citations: 55 F. App'x 772
Docket Number: No. 01-3355
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark J. WRIGHT, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 55
Pages: 772–773

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark J. WRIGHT, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 01-3355.
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 28, 2003.
Decided Feb. 3, 2003.
Before EASTERBROOK, EVANS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Order
The only argument in this criminal appeal is that when imposing sentence the district judge should have held defendant responsible for less than five kilograms of cocaine (an amount that led to a 140-month term of imprisonment).
The argument is unavailing, because the jury returned a special verdict concluding that defendant had conspired to distribute at least five kilograms of cocaine. This finding, beyond a reasonable doubt, makes it impossible to show that the district judge erred when finding by a preponderance of the evidence that defendant is responsible for five kilos. See United States v. Bequette, 309 F.3d 448 (7th Cir. 2002). Because this appeal is controlled by that recent decision, we grant counsel's motion to waive oral argument. On the authority of Bequette, the judgment is
AFFIRMED.