Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Edwin MALDONADO-BURGOS, Defendant, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-07-07
Citations: 869 F.3d 1
Docket Number: No. 15-2145
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Edwin MALDONADO-BURGOS, Defendant, Appellee.
Judges: Howard, Chief Judge, .Torruella, Lynch, Dyk, Thompson, Kayatta, and Barron, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 869
Pages: 1–11

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Edwin MALDONADO-BURGOS, Defendant, Appellee.
No. 15-2145
United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
Entered: July 7, 2017
Leslie R. Caldwell, Sung-Hee Suh, US Dept of Justice, Criminal Division, John Patrick Taddei, US Dept of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Washington, DC, Marshal David Morgan, Nelson Jose Perez-Sosa, Juan Carlos Reyes-Ramos, US Attorney’s Office, San Juan, PR, for Appellant.
Victor J, Gonzalez-Bothwell, Eleonora Concepcion Marranzini, Vivianne Marie Marrero-Torres, Liza Lorraine Rosado-Rodriguez, Eric A. Vos, Federal Public Defender Office, District of Puerto Rico, San Juan, PR, for Defendant-Appellee.
Howard, Chief Judge, .Torruella, Lynch, Dyk, Thompson, Kayatta, and Barron, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER OF COURT
Appellant United States of America filed a petition for rehearing en banc, and, pursuant to First Circuit Internal Operating Procedure X(C), the appellant's petition for rehearing en banc has also been treated as a petition for rehearing before the original panel. The petition for rehearing has been denied by the panel of judges who decided the case, and the petition for rehearing en banc having been submitted to the active judges of this court and a majority of the judges not having voted that the case be heard en banc, it is ordered that the petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc be denied.