Case Name: Ophelia Azriel De'LONTA, a/k/a Michael Stokes, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gene JOHNSON, Director/VADOC; L. Edmonds, Warden/Buckingham Correctional Center; R.W. Booker, Assistant Warden/Buckingham Correctional Center; L.R. Montalbano; G.K. Washington, Defendants-Appellees, and Unknown Defendants, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-11-27
Citations: 490 F. App'x 579
Docket Number: No. 12-7285
Parties: Ophelia Azriel De’LONTA, a/k/a Michael Stokes, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gene JOHNSON, Director/VADOC; L. Edmonds, Warden/Buckingham Correctional Center; R.W. Booker, Assistant Warden/Buckingham Correctional Center; L.R. Montalbano; G.K. Washington, Defendants-Appellees, and Unknown Defendants, Defendant.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 490
Pages: 579–580

Head Matter:
Ophelia Azriel De’LONTA, a/k/a Michael Stokes, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gene JOHNSON, Director/VADOC; L. Edmonds, Warden/Buckingham Correctional Center; R.W. Booker, Assistant Warden/Buckingham Correctional Center; L.R. Montalbano; G.K. Washington, Defendants-Appellees, and Unknown Defendants, Defendant.
No. 12-7285.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 20, 2012.
Decided: Nov. 27, 2012.
Ophelia Azriel De’Lonta, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ophelia Azriel De'Lonta appeals the district court's order denying relief on her complaint alleging violations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act ("RLUIPA"), 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. De'Lonta v. Johnson, No. 7:11-cv-00175-JCT-RSB, 2012 WL 2921539 (W.D.Va. July 17, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.