Case Name: William McNamara v. City of New Britain et al.
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1965-11-09
Citations: 153 Conn. 705
Docket Number: 
Parties: William McNamara v. City of New Britain et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 153
Pages: 705–706

Head Matter:
William McNamara v. City of New Britain et al.
King, C. J., Murphy, Alcorn, Shannon and House, Js.
Argued October 8
decided November 9, 1965
George J. Coyle, for the appellant (plaintiff).
Andrew P. Denusse, corporation counsel, for the appellees (defendants).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
There was no stipulation of facts in this case. The only facts properly appearing in the record are those alleged in the first six paragraphs of the first count of the complaint which were admitted in the answer. These are not sufficient for a determination of the single question of law raised in the appeal to this court. See Postemski v. Watrous, 151 Conn. 183, 184, 195 A.2d 425.
Other facts essential to a decision of the sole ground of appeal appear in the memorandum of decision and seem to be assumed in one portion of the defendants' brief although they are denied in another portion of the same brief.
In this situation we cannot determine the appeal on its merits.
There is no error.