Case Name: In re ESTATE of Laurence Marie Antoinette Balechou SANCHEZ, Deceased. Joan Pecheux GRAND, Executrix, Appellant, v. Joseph M. FITZGERALD, Executor of Estate of Rev. Louis Balechou, Deceased, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1963-07-30
Citations: 155 So. 2d 419
Docket Number: No. 63-105
Parties: In re ESTATE of Laurence Marie Antoinette Balechou SANCHEZ, Deceased. Joan Pecheux GRAND, Executrix, Appellant, v. Joseph M. FITZGERALD, Executor of Estate of Rev. Louis Balechou, Deceased, Appellee.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, TILLMAN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 155
Pages: 419–419

Head Matter:
In re ESTATE of Laurence Marie Antoinette Balechou SANCHEZ, Deceased. Joan Pecheux GRAND, Executrix, Appellant, v. Joseph M. FITZGERALD, Executor of Estate of Rev. Louis Balechou, Deceased, Appellee.
No. 63-105.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
July 30, 1963.
Leonard G. Egert, Miami, for appellant.
Joseph M. Fitzgerald, Miami, for appel-lee.
Before BARKDULL, C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, TILLMAN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appellant, Joan Pecheux Grand, as Executrix of the estate of Laurence M. A. B. Sanchez, claims error because the county judge denied her "Petition to extend time to file objections to claims". Section 733.18(2), Fla.Stat., F.S.A. grants to the county judge the right to extend the time for filing objection to a claim for "good cause shown". The discretion is in the county judge.
The appellant argues that the county judge ought to have extended the time, but fails to carry the burden of demonstrating an abuse of discretion. Therefore, no error has been shown.
Affirmed.