Case Name: In the Matter of D. B. T., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. D. B. T., Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2007-01-03
Citations: 210 Or. App. 460
Docket Number: 0507-67673; A129713
Parties: In the Matter of D. B. T., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. D. B. T., Appellant.
Judges: Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Linder, Judge pro tempore.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 210
Pages: 460–461

Head Matter:
Submitted on record and briefs November 3, 2006,
reversed January 3, 2007
In the Matter of D. B. T., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. D. B. T., Appellant.
0507-67673; A129713
150 P3d 1070
Lance D. Perdue filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Brendan C. Dunn, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Linder, Judge pro tempore.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
In this mental commitment case, appellant contends that the evidence in the record is insufficient to establish that, because of a mental disorder, he is presently a danger to himself or others or is unable to provide for his basic personal needs. ORS 426.130. The state concedes that the evidence does not establish the grounds for the order of commitment that was entered in this case. On de novo review, we agree and accept the concession.
Reversed.