Case Name: The HOPE CLINIC, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. James E. RYAN, Attorney General of Illinois, and Richard K. Devine, State's Attorney of Cook County, Illinois, Defendants-Appellants; Dennis D. Christensen, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. James E. Doyle, Attorney General of Wisconsin, and Diane M. Nicks, District Attorney for Dane County, Wisconsin, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1999-11-30
Citations: 197 F.3d 876
Docket Number: Nos. 98-1726, 99-2528, 99-2533
Parties: The HOPE CLINIC, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. James E. RYAN, Attorney General of Illinois, and Richard K. Devine, State’s Attorney of Cook County, Illinois, Defendants-Appellants. Dennis D. Christensen, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. James E. Doyle, Attorney General of Wisconsin, and Diane M. Nicks, District Attorney for Dane County, Wisconsin, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Circuit Judge Ripple did not participate in the consideration or decision of these eases.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 197
Pages: 876–879

Head Matter:
The HOPE CLINIC, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. James E. RYAN, Attorney General of Illinois, and Richard K. Devine, State’s Attorney of Cook County, Illinois, Defendants-Appellants. Dennis D. Christensen, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. James E. Doyle, Attorney General of Wisconsin, and Diane M. Nicks, District Attorney for Dane County, Wisconsin, Defendants-Appellees.
Nos. 98-1726, 99-2528, 99-2533.
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Nov. 30, 1999.

Opinion:
Order
By the Court:
The motions for stays of mandate are denied by an equally divided court. By majority vote, pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 41(b), the court has determined that the mandates will issue on December 1, 1999.
Circuit Judge Ripple did not participate in the consideration or decision of these eases.