Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paul A. LEE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-10-10
Citations: 295 F. App'x 579
Docket Number: No. 08-6948
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paul A. LEE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 295
Pages: 579–580

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paul A. LEE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-6948.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 30, 2008.
Decided: Oct. 10, 2008.
Paul A. Lee, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Paul A. Lee appeals the district court's order denying his motion for discovery of certain electronically intercepted communications. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lee, No. 5:94-cr-00096-FPS-JES-l (N.D. W.Va. June 2, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.