Case Name: Matty McLaughlin v. United States
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1920-01-12
Citations: 251 U.S. 541
Docket Number: No. 591
Parties: Matty McLaughlin v. United States.
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 251
Pages: 541–542

Head Matter:
No. 591.
Matty McLaughlin v. United States.
Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio.
Submitted January 5, 1920.
Decided January 12, 1920.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) Toledo Newspaper Co. v. United States, 247 U. S. 402, 410-411; Bessette v. W. B. Conkey Co., 194 U. S. 324, 328-337; O'Neal v. United States, 190 U. S. 36, 37-38. (2) Carey v. Houston & Texas Central Ry. Co., 150 U. S. 171; Maynard v. Hecht, 151 U. S. 324; Courtney v. Pradt, 196 U. S. 89. (3) In re Lennon, 150 U. S. 393, 399-401. (4) Itow v. United States, 233 U. S. 581; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182, 184. Mr. Daniel L. Cruice and Mr. Rob V. Phillips for plaintiff in error. The Solicitor General and Mr. A. F. Myers for the United States. Mr. Thos. H. Tracy and Mr. George D. Welles, by leave of court, filed a brief as amid curios.