Case Name: John J. SALERNO v. NATIONAL-CANAL VILLERE SUPERMARKETS/NATIONAL TEA COMPANY, National Tea Company Self Insurance Fund, and Frank McEachern; John J. Salerno v. Frank McEachern, Herman J. Hohensee, George Baehr, John Doe, Jim Doe, National-Canal Villere Supermarkets/National Tea Company, and National Tea Company Self Insurance Fund. In re Medical Review Panel of John J. Salerno. National Tea Company and General Accident Insurance Company v. Christian Health Ministries, Inc., d/b/a Mercy+Baptist Medical Center
Court: Louisiana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 2004-03-12
Citations: 869 So. 2d 829
Docket Number: No. 2004-C-0057
Parties: John J. SALERNO v. NATIONAL-CANAL VILLERE SUPERMARKETS/NATIONAL TEA COMPANY, National Tea Company Self Insurance Fund, and Frank McEachern. John J. Salerno v. Frank McEachern, Herman J. Hohensee, George Baehr, John Doe, Jim Doe, National-Canal Villere Supermarkets/National Tea Company, and National Tea Company Self Insurance Fund. In re Medical Review Panel of John J. Salerno. National Tea Company and General Accident Insurance Company v. Christian Health Ministries, Inc., d/b/a Mercy+Baptist Medical Center.
Judges: 
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 869
Pages: 829–829

Head Matter:
John J. SALERNO v. NATIONAL-CANAL VILLERE SUPERMARKETS/NATIONAL TEA COMPANY, National Tea Company Self Insurance Fund, and Frank McEachern. John J. Salerno v. Frank McEachern, Herman J. Hohensee, George Baehr, John Doe, Jim Doe, National-Canal Villere Supermarkets/National Tea Company, and National Tea Company Self Insurance Fund. In re Medical Review Panel of John J. Salerno. National Tea Company and General Accident Insurance Company v. Christian Health Ministries, Inc., d/b/a Mercy+Baptist Medical Center.
No. 2004-C-0057.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
March 12, 2004.

Opinion:
In re National Tea Company; General Accident Insurance Company; — Defendants); Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. A, Nos. 91-20230, 91-23298, 94-15738, 95-8461; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No(s). 2002-CA-1519, 2002-CA-1520, 2002-CA-1521, 2002-CA-1522.
Denied.