Case Name: Ruby LAMPMAN, Appellant, v. CITY OF NORTH MIAMI, a municipal corporation, and Daniel DeCicco, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1968-04-23
Citations: 209 So. 2d 273
Docket Number: No. 67-557
Parties: Ruby LAMPMAN, Appellant, v. CITY OF NORTH MIAMI, a municipal corporation, and Daniel DeCicco, Appellees.
Judges: Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 209
Pages: 273–273

Head Matter:
Ruby LAMPMAN, Appellant, v. CITY OF NORTH MIAMI, a municipal corporation, and Daniel DeCicco, Appellees.
No. 67-557.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
April 23, 1968.
Ralph M. Jones, Miami, for appellant.
Stephens, Demos & Magill, Dean, Adams, George & Wood, Miami, for appellees.
Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff below appeals an order granting summary final judgment in favor of the defendants. We find this case to be closely analogous to the case of Visingardi v. Tirone, Fla.1966, 193 So.2d 601. It is the burden of a party moving for summary judgment to show conclusively that no material issues remain for trial. Plaintiff must, of course, prove the elements of her cause of action, but she need not do so until trial. To require her to prove her case in order to successfully oppose a motion for summary judgment imposes a burden upon plaintiff that is neither contemplated nor justified under the cases and rules of procedure. Therefore, the order appealed must be reversed.
Reversed.