Case Name: Verizon Communications Inc. et al. v. Federal Communications Commission et al.; WorldCom, Inc., et al. v. Verizon Communications Inc. et al.; Federal Communications Commission et al. v. Iowa Utilities Board et al.; AT&T Corp. v. Iowa Utilities Board et al.; and General Communications, Inc. v. Iowa Utilities Board et al.
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-01-22
Citations: 531 U.S. 1124
Docket Number: No. 00-511; No. 00-555; No. 00-587; No. 00-590; No. 00-602
Parties: Verizon Communications Inc. et al. v. Federal Communications Commission et al.; WorldCom, Inc., et al. v. Verizon Communications Inc. et al.; Federal Communications Commission et al. v. Iowa Utilities Board et al.; AT&T Corp. v. Iowa Utilities Board et al.; and General Communications, Inc. v. Iowa Utilities Board et al.
Judges: Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 531
Pages: 1124–1125

Head Matter:
No. 00-511.
No. 00-555.
No. 00-587.
No. 00-590.
No. 00-602.
Verizon Communications Inc. et al. v. Federal Communications Commission et al.; WorldCom, Inc., et al. v. Verizon Communications Inc. et al.; Federal Communications Commission et al. v. Iowa Utilities Board et al.; AT&T Corp. v. Iowa Utilities Board et al.; and General Communications, Inc. v. Iowa Utilities Board et al.

Opinion:
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari granted limited to the following questions: "(1) Whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that 47 U. S. C. § 252(d)(1) (Telecommunications Act of 1996) forecloses the cost methodology adopted by the Federal Communications Commission, which is based on the efficient replacement cost of existing technology, for determining the interconnection rates that new entrants into local telecommunications markets must pay incumbent local telephone companies. (2) Whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that neither the Takings Clause nor the Telecommunications Act of 1996 requires the incorporation of an incumbent local exchange carrier's 'historical' costs into the rates that it may charge new entrants for access to its network elements. (3) Whether 47 U. S. C. § 251(c)(3) prohibits regulators from requiring that incumbent local telephone companies combine certain previously uncombined network elements when a new entrant requests the combination and agrees to compensate the incumbent for performing that task." Cases consolidated, and a total of one hour allotted for oral argument.
Justice O'Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.
Reported below: 219 F. 3d 744.