Case Name: LODGE v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1912-12-04
Citations: 151 S.W. 812
Docket Number: 
Parties: LODGE v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 151
Pages: 812–812

Head Matter:
LODGE v. STATE.
(Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Dec. 4, 1912.)
Criminal Law (§ 1090 ) — Record—Statement op Facts — Bill op Exceptions.
Where there is neither a statement of facts nor bill of exceptions in the record, assignments in the motion for new trial are not reviewable.
[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2789, 2803-2827, 2927, 2928, 2948, 3204; Dec. Dig. § 1090. ]
Appeal from Criminal District Court, Dallas County; Riobt. B. Seay, Judge.
Arthur Lodge was convicted of robbery, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gén., for the State.
For other cases see same topic and section NUMBER in Dec. Dig. & Am. Dig. Key-No. Series & Rep’r Indexes

Opinion:
HARPER, J.
Appellant was indicted, prosecuted, and convicted of the offense of robbery.
There is neither a statement of facts nor bills of exception accompanying the record, and under these circumstances there is no assignment in the motion for a new trial we can review.
The judgment is affirmed.