Case Name: Angel Kathlene CHINN, Appellant, v. Kyle Garrett CHINN, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-06-05
Citations: 380 S.W.3d 7
Docket Number: No. ED 97200
Parties: Angel Kathlene CHINN, Appellant, v. Kyle Garrett CHINN, Respondent.
Judges: Before: GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON, III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 380
Pages: 7–8

Head Matter:
Angel Kathlene CHINN, Appellant, v. Kyle Garrett CHINN, Respondent.
No. ED 97200.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District.
June 5, 2012.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Sept. 12, 2012.
Application for Transfer Denied Oct. 30, 2012.
James M. Garrett, Kirksville, MO, for appellant.
Neil F. Maune, Jr., Hannibal, MO, for respondent.
Before: GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON, III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Angel Kathlene Chinn appeals from the trial court's Judgment and Decree of Dissolution of Marriage. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the trial court's decision is supported by substantial evidence and does not erroneously declare the law, Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976), and is not an abuse of discretion, Slattery v. Slattery, 185 S.W.3d 692, 697-98 (Mo.App. E.D.2006). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2012).