Case Name: ADDISON COUNTY TRUST CO. v. CASPARI
Court: Louisiana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1933-05-29
Citations: 154 So. 613
Docket Number: No. 32058
Parties: ADDISON COUNTY TRUST CO. v. CASPARI.
Judges: ST. PAUL, J., dissents.
Reporter: Southern Reporter
Volume: 154
Pages: 613–618

Head Matter:
179 La. 577
ADDISON COUNTY TRUST CO. v. CASPARI.
No. 32058.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
May 29, 1933.
On Rehearing Oct. 30 and Nov. 7, 1933.
On Second Rehearing Feb. 26, 1934.
Rehearing Denied April 2, 1934.
Hakenyos, Provosty & Staples, of Alexandria, Phanor Breazeale, of Natchitoches, and Le Doux R. Provosty, of Alexandria, for appellant.
J. B. Nachman, of Alexandria, for appellee.

Opinion:
LAND, Justice.
As the alleged bona fide holder for valuable consideration before maturity of six promissory notes, made by defendant payable to the order of Security Mortgage Company of Louisiana, Inc., Alexandria, La., and by that company assigned and transferred without recourse, Addison County Trust Company of Middlobury, Vt., has brought the present suit to recover against defendant a judgment in the sum of $2,800 in principal, with interest thereon at the rate of 6 per cent, per annum from November 1, 1929, and 8 per cent, interest thereon after November 1, 1930, until paid, and 10 per cent, attorney's fees. Each of these notes has attached thereto interest coupons.
In his answer, defendant admits signing these notes and the interest coupons attached, but denies that plaintiff is the bona fide owner and holder for. value received before maturity of the notes sued upon, and avers that the notes were fraudulently and' wrongfully indorsed by Security Mortgage Company of Louisiana, Inc., the agent of plaintiff in. the suit, and are fraudulently and wrongfully held by the Addison County Trust Company.
Further answering, defendant avers that no consideration was paid by plaintiff for these notes and the interest coupons attached, but that same were received by the Addison County Trust Company for a mortgage loan to one Fontenot, negotiated by Security Mortgage Company of Louisiana, Inc., as agent for that company, and that this loan was valueless; and that the holding of these notes by plaintiff is a fraud upon defendant and an attempt to subject him to liability without basis in fact or in law.
The case was tried upon these issues in the lower court, and judgment was rendered in favor of defendant, rejecting plaintiff's demand and dismissing plaintiff's suit at its costs.
1. On August SI, 1929, defendant, Samuel Caspari, purchased from the heirs of Nicola G-ivanovich, for speculation purposes, a number of farms, or tracts of land, situated in the parish of Natchitoches. Seven of these farms, or tracts of land, are located on Cane river, and one on Red river in the parish of Natchitoches, and contain an estimated, acreage of 13,095.61. This estimate, however, does not include the sale to defendant "of all other lands" in ward 10 of Natchitoches parish, the acreage of which is not stated in the deed.
It is declared in this deed that: "It is hereby recognized and declared by said vendors that the said Samuel Caspari, in anticipation of effecting this purpose (the purchase of these lands) has executed and caused to he recorded in favor of the Security Mortgage Company, certain acts of mortgage affecting three thousand, seven hundred ninety-nine and fifty-three hundredths (3,799.53) acres of the above described lands and improvements thereon and particularly described by loan numbers and property descriptions as set forth in acts of mortgage as follows to-wit:
"Loan 4025 Samuel Caspari, 481.75 acres.
"Loan 402G Samuel Caspari, 1112.50 acres.
"Loan 4027 Samuel Caspari, 755.37 acres.
"Loan 4028 Samuel Caspari, 823.50 acres.
"Loan 4029 Samuel Caspari, 277.35 acres.
"Loan 4030 Samuel Caspari, 149 acres.
"Loan 4031 Samuel Caspari, 200 acres."
After each of these loans, the lands mortgaged to secure same are specifically described in the act of sale from the heirs of Nicola Givanovieh to Samuel Caspari, defendant.
Then follows this declaration in the act of sale: "The said vendors do hereby declare that said vendor's lien and privilege and special mortgage hereto recited as being granted in favor of said vendors shall be subordinated in rank and privilege to said special mortgages in favor of said Security Mortgage Company, affecting said three thousand, seven hundred ninety-nine and fifty-three hundredths .(3,799.53) acres, and that, therefore, the mortgage of said vendors shall be a second mortgage upon said 3,799.53 acres, the existence of which mortgages in favor of said Security Mortgage Company is hereby recognized only in tho event of the said Samuel Caspari accepting this act of sale as herein indicated and set forth."
On August' 31, 1929, the defendant, Samuel Caspari, accepted in a notarial act the above act of sale and, in addition to the vendor's lien and privilege granted by him, gave a special mortgage in favor of his vendors and of future holder or holders of the notes for the credit portion of the purchase price, without the necessity of any notarial transfer thereof. The consideration of this sale was the sum of $200,000, $100,000 of which was paid in cash, and for the balance defendant executed 59 notes, 5S of these notes being for $1,700 each, and the last for $1,400.
This act of sale was received for record in .Natchitoches parish August 31, 1929.
The act of sale from the heirs of Nicola ^Givanovieh to defendant, Samuel Caspari, is -of date July 29,1929; but before this act was .-accepted by him and recorded on Auyust 31, J'929, he had mortgaged 3,799.53 acres of this ;proi>erty in favor of the Security Mortgage [Company. Each of these mortgages is designated as "Loan 4025 and seriatim to- 4031, ¡Samuel Caspari," and states the acreage aft:er each loan secured by the mortgage.
The .Security Mortgage Company was, therefore, well aware of the fact that the above mortgages executed to its order by defendant, Samuel Caspari, did not represent any indebtedness whatever due by him to the Security Mortgage Company, but were farm loan mortgages to be negotiated by the Security Mortgage Company, as the agent of defendant, for the purpose of securing for him loans on the farms mortgaged.
The six notes upon which the Addison County Trust Company has sued are "Number 5079 -A-B-C-D-E-F," and each is designated as:
"First Mortgage Real Estate Bond
"Negotiated by the
"Security Mortgage Company of Louisiana, Inc.,
"Alexandria, Louisiana."
These notes are dated July 2⅛, 1929, prior to the purchase -by defendant from the heirs of Nicola Givanovieh, and are payable to the order of the Security Mortgage Company, and on the reverse of each appears the following:
"For value received we hereby assign and transfer the within note and coupons together with all interest in and rights under the mortgage securing the same to-without recourse.
"[Signed] Security Mortgage Company of La., Inc.,
"By C. W. Brown, Vice President.
"Attest, G. At Burton, Secretary."
At the bottom of each note also appears the following:
"Ne Varietur
"For identification with an act of special mortgage containing pact de non alienando and 10% attorney's fee clause. Executed before me this 24th day of July, 1929.
"[Signed] Marguerite C. Bamai-d,
"Notary Public [Seal]."
The act of mortgage was never recorded, either by the Security Mortgage Company, the notary, or by defendant.
At the time defendant executed these notes, he applied to the Security Mortgage Company for a loan, and these notes were delivered by him to that company, as his agent, solely for the purpose of negotiation for a loan. The Security Mortgage Company well knew that defendant was not indebted to that company in any sum whatever, and that said company had no right whatever to sell these notes to any one except for cash, in order to obtain the loan.needed by -defendant. The Security Mortgage Company also well knew that a number of such loan mortgages had been ex- eeuted on other occasions in its favor by defendant, as evidenced by the recitals in the act of sale from the heirs of Nicola Givano-vich to defendant, Samuel Caspari.
Plaintiff, Addison County Trust Company, is engaged in the banking business at Mid-dlebury, Vt., and in the purchase of loan mortgages. It acquired these loan notes on September SO, 1920, through H. G. Root, Inc., from the Security Mortgage Company. H. G. Root, Inc., is located at Rutland, Vt., and is engaged in the business of purchasing securities, principally western farm loans, and reselling them to its customers, principally located in the state of Vermont. H. G. Root, Inc., is also the agent of the Security Mortgage Company of Louisiana. Mr. G. H. Root, witness for plaintiff, testified that: "About August 1, 1929, Mr. Burton (secretary of the Security Mortgage Company) was here (Rutland, Vt) and met Judge Sturtevant, and Mr. Ufford (secretary & treasurer of the Ad'dison County Trust Co.) and myself in Judge Sturtevant's office, at wliieh time he proposed,, the exchange of the Fontenot loan for the Caspari loan No. 5079, and, at that time, had the application of this loan with him, and submitted it to Mr. Ufford and Judge Sturtevant Mr. Burton came from Louisiana to Rutland, and he and I came together to Judge Sturtevant's office, where the above conversation took place." T. 113,
On August 28, 1929, H. G. Root wrote to G. A. Burton, secretary of the Security Mortgage Company, to send him "application on 5(fl9-Oaspari $2,809.00," the notes sued on in this case, and stated in the letter of that date: "I think this is the loan that we were to substitute with the Addison County Trust Company for the Fonte?iot loan," T, 130.
On September 27, 1929, three days before the Addison County Trust Company purchased the Caspari loan notes, P. S. Ufford, its secretary and treasurer, wrote the following letter to H. G. Root, Inc., Rutland, Vt.: "Inclosed herewith you should find Caspari application as requested by you this morning." T. 131.
On September 28, 1929, H. G. Root, vice president of H. G. Root, Inc., and agent of Security Mortgage Company, wrote to G. A. Burton, secretary of that company, as follows:
"I have at last made a trade on 5079-Cas-pari for 33!;0-Fontenot, which deal was made when you were with me in Mr. Sturtevant's office at Middlebury.
"I will send in the old papers and check for difference the first part of next week, just as soon as they are received from the Bank."' T. 132.
On September 30, 1929, the date of the purchase of the Caspari loan notes 'by the Addison County Trust Company, P. S. Ufford, secretary and treasurer of that company, wrote to H. G. Root, Inc., as follows: "Enclosed herewith you should find check for $1,305.33 balance you are due in exchange of Fontenot #3340 for Caspari #5079." T. 133.
On October 1, 1929, H. G. Root, vice president of H. G. Root, Inc., and agent of the Security Mortgage Company, replied as follows to the letter received from P. S. Ufford, secretary and treasurer of the Addison County Trust Company: "This will acknowledge receipt.of check for $1,305.33 in payment of the difference in the exchange of the Fontenot loan for the Caspari loan, for which we thank you." T. 134.
On October 1, 1929, H. G. Root, vice president oí H. G. Root, Inc., and agent of the Security Mortgage Company, wrote the following letter to that company:
"Mr. G. A. Burton, Sec.,
"Security Mortgage Co., Alexandria, La.
"My dear Mr. Burton:
"I enclose herewith cheek for $1,305.33 in payment of the difference in the exchange of the Fontenot loan for the Caspari loan with the Addison County Trust Company. The statement of the transaction is as follows:
"5079 Caspari Prin. Oct. 1, 1929 $2800.00
"3340 Fontenot Prin. $1300.00
"Delinquent interest 1928
"3 mos- on $1500.00 (a) 8% $30.00
"9 mos. on $1300.00 (a) 8% $78.00
"From 12-1-28 to 10-1-29 (a) 8% $86.87 $1,494.67
Balance due $1,305.33
"Kindly have the enclosed assignments recorded in the name of Addison County Trust Company and return same to us as soon as possible. Also send in the recorded mortgage and title policy in this loan as soon as you can." T. 135.
The act of mortgage securing the Caspari loan notes was never recorded, and neither the Fontenot mortgage note, nor the delinquent interest paid on same by the Addison County Trust Company, nor one cent of the cheek for $1,305.33, was ever delivered or paid to the defendant, Samuel Caspari, by the Security Mortgage Company.
In addition to all of this, the Addison County Trust Company admits in the testimony of P. S. Ufford, its secretary and treasurer, that it purchased the Caspari loan notes, under a transfer and assignment to it "without recourse?'; that it made no investí- gation as to whether or not the mortgage securing the Caspari notes had 'been -recorded; and did not have the title to the property subject to the mortgage investigated. T. 41, 45, 46.
As the Addison County Trust Company well knew that the Security Mortgage Company did not oion the Caspari notes, but that these were loan notes to be disposed of by that company solely for the purpose of raising money for a loan applied for by defendant, plaintiff was well aware of the fact, at the time of the purchase of these notes, that the Security Mortgage Company had no right or authority whatever to sell these notes to plaintiff for a consideration, part in cash, and part for another mortgage note which, at best, was of doubtful value, as the debtor had defaulted on the payment of interest.
Our conclusion is that plaintiff did not acquire the Caspari loan notes, either in good faith or at all, under the facts and circumstances of this case.
Security Mortgage Company, the trusted agent of defendant, not only succeeded in fleecing him, but also in fleecing the plaintiff, in its attempt to secure from that company "good mortgage notes" in exchange for one of questionable value.
Judgment a&rmed.
ST. PAUL, J., dissents.