Case Name: Howard et al., Appellees, v. Cunard Line Limited, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1988-06-08
Citations: 37 Ohio St. 3d 134
Docket Number: No. 88-192
Parties: Howard et al., Appellees, v. Cunard Line Limited, Appellant.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 37
Pages: 134–135

Head Matter:
Howard et al., Appellees, v. Cunard Line Limited, Appellant.
[Cite as Howard v. Cunard Line Ltd. (1988), 37 Ohio St. 3d 134.]
No. 88-192
Submitted May 3, 1988
Decided June 8, 1988.
Gary B. Garson Co., L.P.A., and Gary B. Garson, for appellees.
Arter & Hadden, Raymond J. Marrar, Irene C. Keyse-Walker and Edward S. Jerse, for appellant.

Opinion:
The motion to certify the record is allowed. The judgment of the court of appeals dismissing appellant's appeal as untimely filed is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for consideration of the merits of the appeal, on authority of Atkinson v. Grumman Ohio Corp. (1988), 37 Ohio St. 3d 80, 523 N.E. 2d 851.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.