Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Melvin QUICK, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-05-10
Citations: 476 F. App'x 423
Docket Number: No. 12-6183
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Melvin QUICK, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 476
Pages: 423–423

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Melvin QUICK, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-6183.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 2, 2012.
Decided: May 10, 2012.
Melvin Quick, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Ap-pellee.
Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Melvin Quick appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Quick, No. 3:96-cr-00134-FDW-6 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 24, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.