Case Name: Vincent Nathaniel CANNADY, Appellant, v. FIRST COMP, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-02-25
Citations: 366 F. App'x 720
Docket Number: No. 09-1961
Parties: Vincent Nathaniel CANNADY, Appellant, v. FIRST COMP, Appellee.
Judges: Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 366
Pages: 720–720

Head Matter:
Vincent Nathaniel CANNADY, Appellant, v. FIRST COMP, Appellee.
No. 09-1961.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 16, 2010.
Filed: Feb. 25, 2010.
Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Vincent Cannady appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment in his pro se discrimination action against a prospective employer. After careful de novo review, see Arraleh v. County of Ramsey, 461 F.3d 967, 974 (8th Cir.2006) (standard of review), we conclude that summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.