Case Name: Cincinnati Bar Association v. Warren
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1993-06-09
Citations: 66 Ohio St. 3d 334
Docket Number: No. 93-390
Parties: Cincinnati Bar Association v. Warren.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 66
Pages: 334–338

Head Matter:
Cincinnati Bar Association v. Warren.
[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Warren (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 334.]
(No. 93-390
Submitted April 6, 1993
Decided June 9, 1993.)
Wood & Lamping, Henry E. Menninger, Jr., and Naomi C. Dallob, for relator.
Burlew, Caliman & Youngblood Co., L.P.A., and John H. Burlew, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We agree with the board's findings and recommendations. Accordingly, we suspend respondent from the practice of law for one year, with the suspension stayed upon the following conditions: (1) respondent be placed on probation for two years and be required to meet regularly with a monitoring attorney who has been assigned by relator and who will supervise respondent's office practices; (2) during the probationary period, respondent take ten hours of continuing legal education courses on law office management in addition to the standard education requirements; (3) during the probationary period, respondent commit no further disciplinary violations; and (4) respondent immediately dismiss her pending litigation against the Jacksons and submit to mandatory binding arbitration before the Fee Dispute Committee of the Cincinnati Bar Association, if the Jacksons so agree.
Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.