Case Name: Gordon BEASLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Janet Beasley, Plaintiff, v. RED ROCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC; Red Rock Virginia, LLC, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-04-05
Citations: 684 F. App'x 295
Docket Number: No. 16-1063
Parties: Gordon BEASLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Janet Beasley, Plaintiff, v. RED ROCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC; Red Rock Virginia, LLC, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 684
Pages: 295–296

Head Matter:
Gordon BEASLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Janet Beasley, Plaintiff, v. RED ROCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC; Red Rock Virginia, LLC, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-1063
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 28, 2017
Decided: April 5, 2017
Ernest P. Francis, ERNEST P. FRANCIS, LTD., Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Virginia M. Sadler, Padraic K. Keane, JORDAN COYNE LLP, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Gordon Beasley appeals the district court's orders granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellees on some of his claims, denying his motion for summary judgment on one of the Appellees' defenses, and granting judgment as a matter' of law for the Appellees pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(a) after Beasley's presentation of his remaining claims to the jury. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED