Case Name: IN THE MATTER OF HOWARD A. GROSS, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 035181992)
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 2006-03-09
Citations: 186 N.J. 157
Docket Number: 
Parties: IN THE MATTER OF HOWARD A. GROSS, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 035181992).
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 186
Pages: 157–158

Head Matter:
892 A.2d 680
IN THE MATTER OF HOWARD A. GROSS, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 035181992).
March 9, 2006.

Opinion:
ORDER
The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 05-216, concluding that HOWARD A. GROSS of CAMDEN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1992, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months for violating RPC 7.3(d) (giving of something of value to a non-lawyer in exchange for the procurement of clients);
And the Disciplinary Review Board having concluded on the basis of the passage of time since the last act of unethical conduct that the term of suspension should be suspended;
And HOWARD A. GROSS having been ordered to show cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined;
And good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that HOWARD A. GROSS is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months; and it is further
ORDERED that the term of suspension is hereby suspended; and it is further
ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.