Case Name: Norman RUDISELL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-02-27
Citations: 557 So. 2d 226
Docket Number: No. 89-155
Parties: Norman RUDISELL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 557
Pages: 226–227

Head Matter:
Norman RUDISELL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 89-155.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 27, 1990.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Kenneth R. Drake, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Julie S. Thornton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before BARKDULL, COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We conclude that there is no inconsistency of verdicts. See McKee v. State, 450 So.2d 563 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Streeter v. State, 416 So.2d 1203 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); McIntosh v. State, 211 So.2d 256 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968); see also § 806.03(3), Fla.Stat. (1987). There was no error in the denial of the motion for judgment of acquittal. White v. State, 446 So.2d 1031, 1035 (Fla.1984); Johnson v. State, 478 So.2d 885 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), appeal dismissed, 488 So.2d 830 (1986).
Affirmed.