Case Name: Danny TINDLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2001-01-19
Citations: 779 So. 2d 548
Docket Number: No. 2D00-5321
Parties: Danny TINDLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: PARKER, A.C.J., and WHATLEY and CASANUEVA, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 779
Pages: 548–548

Head Matter:
Danny TINDLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D00-5321.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Jan. 19, 2001.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Danny Tindle appeals the trial court's order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Because Tindle has failed to allege that his sentence imposed under the 1995 sentencing guidelines would constitute a departure sentence under the 1994 sentencing guidelines, Tindle has failed to present a facially sufficient claim for relief under Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000).
As this court did in Daniels v. State, 771 So.2d 57 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), we affirm without prejudice to Tindle to file a timely, facially sufficient motion to withdraw his plea pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 if he has sufficient grounds to do so.
PARKER, A.C.J., and WHATLEY and CASANUEVA, JJ., concur.