Case Name: Elliot RAMBERG, Appellant, v. Frances TIBBITTS et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1972-06-06
Citations: 262 So. 2d 736
Docket Number: No. 71-1370
Parties: Elliot RAMBERG, Appellant, v. Frances TIBBITTS et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 262
Pages: 736–737

Head Matter:
Elliot RAMBERG, Appellant, v. Frances TIBBITTS et al., Appellees.
No. 71-1370.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
June 6, 1972.
Fuller, Brumer, Moss & Cohen and Stewart W. Logan, Miami, for appellant.
Walton, Lantaff, Schroeder, Carson & Wahl and Calvin F. David, Miami, for ap-pellees.
Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from an order of the trial judge granting a new trial because of errors in the charge given the jury. We agree that the errors may have been substantial in their impact upon the jury and affirm the order appealed. See Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. Fulmer, Fla.1969, 227 So.2d 870; Bernstein v. Coats, Fla.App.1971, 247 So.2d 725; Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. Flournoy, Fla.App.1961, 136 So.2d 32.
Affirmed.