Case Name: STATE OF ALABAMA on the relation of Irvine C. PORTER, chairman of the unauthorized practices of law committee of the Alabama State Bar, and Irvine C. Porter, individually, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DUN & BRADSTREET, INC., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1973-01-31
Citations: 472 F.2d 1049
Docket Number: No. 72-2654
Parties: STATE OF ALABAMA on the relation of Irvine C. PORTER, chairman of the unauthorized practices of law committee of the Alabama State Bar, and Irvine C. Porter, individually, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DUN & BRADSTREET, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 472
Pages: 1049–1049

Head Matter:
STATE OF ALABAMA on the relation of Irvine C. PORTER, chairman of the unauthorized practices of law committee of the Alabama State Bar, and Irvine C. Porter, individually, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DUN & BRADSTREET, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 72-2654.
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Jan. 31, 1973.
Marvin Cherner, Frank M. Young, III, Birmingham, Ala., for plaintiffs-appellants.
Drayton T. Scott, Drayton Nabers, Jr., Birmingham, Ala., for defendant-appel-lee.
Before THORNBERRY, GOLDBERG and RONEY, Circuit Judges.
Rule 18, 5th Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5th Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
This case involves the problem of what is and what is not the practice of law under Title 46, Section 42, Code of Alabama, 1940. We affirm on the basis of the District Court's opinion. State of Alabama on the relation of Irvine C. Porter v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., 352 F.Supp. 1226 (N.D.Ala. 1972).
Affirmed.