Case Name: AI STANLEY, Petitioner, v. CITY OF PERRY, Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1965-02-17
Citations: 171 So. 2d 534
Docket Number: No. 33841
Parties: AI STANLEY, Petitioner, v. CITY OF PERRY, Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
Judges: DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, O’CON-NELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 171
Pages: 534–534

Head Matter:
AI STANLEY, Petitioner, v. CITY OF PERRY, Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
No. 33841.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Feb. 17, 1965.
Jim Dye of Dye & Joanos, Tallahassee, for petitioner.
E. R. Mills, Jr., Ocala, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lake-land, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date October 19, 1964.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.
DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, O'CON-NELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.