Case Name: Farbro Corporation, Respondent, v. A. F. A. Realty Corporation, Appellant, and Others, Defendants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1932-02
Citations: 235 A.D. 683
Docket Number: 
Parties: Farbro Corporation, Respondent, v. A. F. A. Realty Corporation, Appellant, and Others, Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 235
Pages: 683–683

Head Matter:
Farbro Corporation, Respondent, v. A. F. A. Realty Corporation, Appellant, and Others, Defendants.

Opinion:
-Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur: Lazansky, P. J., dissents on the ground that section 586 of the Civil Practice Act does not apply to an action brought by a vendor who has obtained a judgment of specific performance nor to a case where it is brought to impress a vendee's hen upon real estate that he contracted to buy.