Case Name: STATE v. CARA NINA HARDIN
Court: Minnesota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Minnesota
Decision Date: 1972-10-27
Citations: 294 Minn. 556
Docket Number: No. 43480
Parties: STATE v. CARA NINA HARDIN.
Judges: Considered by Knutson, C. J., and Otis, Peterson, and Kelly, JJ.
Reporter: Minnesota Reports
Volume: 294
Pages: 556–557

Head Matter:
STATE v. CARA NINA HARDIN.
202 N. W. 2d 212.
October 27, 1972
No. 43480.
Hartke, Atkins & Montpetit and Jerrold M. Hartke, for appellant.
Keith M. Stidd, City Attorney, and Larry L. Warren, Assistant City Attorney, for respondent. ■
Considered by Knutson, C. J., and Otis, Peterson, and Kelly, JJ.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This matter comes to us on appeal from an order of the Hennepin County Municipal Court. The defendant challenged the jurisdiction of that* court and moved to dismiss the complaint against her which charged' her with carrying a firearm in violation of a city ordinánce. The lower court denied the motion and we dismiss the appeal from that order. \
Under Minn. St. 632.01, an appeal in a criminal case may only be taken from a judgment or order denying a new trial. For purposes of appeal, ordinance violations are considered criminal proceedings. Village of Crosby v. Stemich, 160 Minn. 261, 199 N. W. 918 (1924). Thus, the appeal in this case is from a nonappealable order and we therefore dismiss the same.
Appeal dismissed.