Case Name: In re EAST WEST ENTERPRISES, INC., Debtor. SCHUYLKILL COUNTY TAX CLAIM BUREAU, Movant, v. EAST WEST ENTERPRISES, INC., Respondent
Court: United States Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1993-12-17
Citations: 178 B.R. 64
Docket Number: Bankruptcy No. 5-93-01848
Parties: In re EAST WEST ENTERPRISES, INC., Debtor. SCHUYLKILL COUNTY TAX CLAIM BUREAU, Movant, v. EAST WEST ENTERPRISES, INC., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Bankruptcy Reporter
Volume: 178
Pages: 64–65

Head Matter:
In re EAST WEST ENTERPRISES, INC., Debtor. SCHUYLKILL COUNTY TAX CLAIM BUREAU, Movant, v. EAST WEST ENTERPRISES, INC., Respondent.
Bankruptcy No. 5-93-01848.
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania, Wilkes-Barre Division.
Dec. 17, 1993.
Randall W. Turano, Stroudsburg, PA, for debtor/respondent.
Mary Kay Bemosky, Pottsville, PA, for movant.

Opinion:
INTERIM ORDER
JOHN J. THOMAS, Bankruptcy Judge.
On December 6,1993 this Court took testimony relative to a Motion for Relief from Automatic Stay filed by the Schuylkill County Tax Claim Bureau.
At that time, it was agreed by the parties that this Court should make a preliminary determination as to whether the Debtor had an equitable interest in the subject property despite the exposure of that property to a public Upset Sale prior to the bankruptcy.
The parties agreed that should the Debtor have no equitable interest, then a judicial sale scheduled for December 20, 1993 should take place as scheduled.
The Court has considered the testimony and the authorities as furnished by counsel and concludes that although the right to redemption by the pre-petition Debtor may have been destroyed pursuant to 72 P.S. § 5860.618, the Debtor nevertheless retains a valuable interest in the form of a "right to excess" identified by the cases of In re Universal Minerals, Inc., 17 B.R. 265 (Bkrtcy.W.D.Pa.1982) and County Commissioners of Fayette County, 386 Pa. 382, 126 A.2d 737 (1956).
This "right to excess" is more specifically found in 72 P.S. § 5860.205 wherein the tax claim bureau, after paying various municipal and hen obligations, is directed to distribute ah remaining monies collected "... to the owner of the property". The owner has been identified to mean "the dehnquent former owner". Breinig v. North Penn School District, 19 Pa.Cmwlth. 377, 379, 339 A.2d 617, 619 (1975). "A taxing district's only legitimate interest in the proceeds derived from a conversion of property acquired by it for non-payment of taxes is a satisfaction in full of ah tax claims and municipal hens, etc. against a property including interest, penalties and costs. It is not the pohcy of the law that a taxing authority shall obtain a windfall from a dehnquent taxpayers property because of his financial difficulties." County Commissioners of Fayette County, supra 386 Pa. at p. 386, 126 A.2d 737.
Accordingly, it is this Court's conclusion that the Debtor retains a valuable interest over and above its pure legal interest. That interest is an equitable interest in at least the right to the excess proceeds and is clearly within the definition of property of the estate as defined by Section 541 of the Bankruptcy Code.
Therefore, the automatic stay is continued pending the transcription of the record, the submission of briefs and the final decision of this Court relative to the Movant's Motion for Rehef from Automatic Stay.
Movant is given twenty (20) days from the date of filing of the transcript to submit further briefs. Respondent is granted twenty (20) additional days to file a responsive brief.