Case Name: WILLIAM YESKEL ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. SAMUEL GROSS ET AL., APPELLANTS
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1930-02-03
Citations: 106 N.J.L. 611
Docket Number: 
Parties: WILLIAM YESKEL ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. SAMUEL GROSS ET AL., APPELLANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 106
Pages: 611–611

Head Matter:
WILLIAM YESKEL ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. SAMUEL GROSS ET AL., APPELLANTS.
Submitted October 26, 1929
Decided February 3, 1930.
For the respondents, Philip J. Schotland.
For the appellants, Grosman & Grosman.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Katzenbach in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Kaliscii, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Yak Buskirk, McGlbnnon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.