Case Name: Theresa B. BRADLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CVS CORPORATION; CVS of Bethesda, LLC; CVS Pharmacy, d/b/a CVS Pharmacy Store # 1831; Midas, Incorporated; Midas Auto Repair and Service Harford Car Care; Stephen Tennant; Shane Ross; Sam Doppler; Yuriy Bronfman; Elena Donskaia; State Auto Insurance Company; Larissa Miller; Scott Patrick Burns, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-07-27
Citations: 328 F. App'x 877
Docket Number: No. 08-2046
Parties: Theresa B. BRADLEY, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. CVS CORPORATION; CVS of Bethesda, LLC; CVS Pharmacy, d/b/a CVS Pharmacy Store # 1831; Midas, Incorporated; Midas Auto Repair and Service Harford Car Care; Stephen Tennant; Shane Ross; Sam Doppler; Yuriy Bronfman; Elena Donskaia; State Auto Insurance Company; Larissa Miller; Scott Patrick Burns, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 328
Pages: 877–877

Head Matter:
Theresa B. BRADLEY, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. CVS CORPORATION; CVS of Bethesda, LLC; CVS Pharmacy, d/b/a CVS Pharmacy Store # 1831; Midas, Incorporated; Midas Auto Repair and Service Harford Car Care; Stephen Tennant; Shane Ross; Sam Doppler; Yuriy Bronfman; Elena Donskaia; State Auto Insurance Company; Larissa Miller; Scott Patrick Burns, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 08-2046.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 23, 2009.
Decided: July 27, 2009.
Theresa B. Bradley, Appellant Pro Se. Scott Patrick Burns, Toyja E. Kelley, Tyd-ings & Rosenberg, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; Frank Furst Daily, III, Law Offices of Frank F. Daily, PA, Hunt Valley, Maryland; Herbert Romulus O’Conor, III, O’Conor Grant & Samuels, Towson, Maryland; Betty Sue Diener, Marks, O’Neill, O’Brien & Courtney, Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Theresa Bradley appeals the district court's order granting the Appellees' motion to dismiss Bradley's civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny as moot Bradley's motion to vacate this court's dismissal for failure to prosecute and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bradley v. CVS Corp., No. 8:07-cv-02732-PJM (D.Md. Aug. 28, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.