Case Name: Manhattan Venture Company, Appellant-Respondent, v. Dover Corporation, Respondent-Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1997-12-11
Citations: 245 A.D.2d 100
Docket Number: 
Parties: Manhattan Venture Company, Appellant-Respondent, v Dover Corporation, Respondent-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 245
Pages: 100–101

Head Matter:
Manhattan Venture Company, Appellant-Respondent, v Dover Corporation, Respondent-Appellant.
[665 NYS2d 878]

Opinion:
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.), entered on or about June 6, 1996, which, inter alia, dismissed the first cause of action sounding in breach of contract seeking recovery of finder's fees, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of reinstating that cause of action except insofar as it seeks punitive damages, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
Issues of material fact remain as to whether plaintiff's disclosure to defendant of information about an acquisition candidate invoked an obligation by defendant to pay a finder's fee to plaintiff under the agreement between these parties. The record is unclear as to whether the acquisition candidate had a confidential relationship with another intermediary and/or whether defendant, when it informed plaintiff that it already had been informed of the potential acquisition, invoked one of the exceptions under the parties' agreement, and related notice requirements, whereby no finder's fee would be paid to plaintiff.
The IAS Court's disposition of the remaining issues was proper. As plaintiff effectively concedes on appeal, no basis has been set forth for recovery of punitive damages under the first cause of action. Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Williams, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.