Case Name: Todd J. HOPFER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-11-13
Citations: 383 S.W.3d 494
Docket Number: No. ED 97880
Parties: Todd J. HOPFER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., C.J, ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J., and LISA K. PAGE, Sp. J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 383
Pages: 494–494

Head Matter:
Todd J. HOPFER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 97880.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Nov. 13, 2012.
Edward Scott Thompson, Missouri Public Defender Office, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Robert Jefferson Bartholomew, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., C.J, ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J., and LISA K. PAGE, Sp. J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Todd Hopfer appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for postcon-viction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying his request for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).