Case Name: Reginald L. LEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE; Jay A. Dackman, P.A.; Anthony J. DeLaurentis, P.A.; William M. O'Connell, P.A.; John K. Reiff, P.A.; Jack E. Reid; DeLaurentis, Reiff & Reid, LLC; Ron Sroka, P.A.; Benjamin Zajdel; Stanley Alpert, P.A.; Heidi S. Kenny, P.A.; Karen M. Authement, P.A.; Mary F. Keenan, Assistant Solicitor; Kyriakos Marudas, Assistant Solicitor; A.J. Billig Auctioneers, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-01-22
Citations: 505 F. App'x 278
Docket Number: No. 12-2257
Parties: Reginald L. LEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE; Jay A. Dackman, P.A.; Anthony J. DeLaurentis, P.A.; William M. O’Connell, P.A.; John K. Reiff, P.A.; Jack E. Reid; DeLaurentis, Reiff & Reid, LLC; Ron Sroka, P.A.; Benjamin Zajdel; Stanley Al pert, P.A.; Heidi S. Kenny, P.A.; Karen M. Authement, P.A.; Mary F. Keenan, Assistant Solicitor; Kyriakos Marudas, Assistant Solicitor; A.J. Billig Auctioneers, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 505
Pages: 278–279

Head Matter:
Reginald L. LEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE; Jay A. Dackman, P.A.; Anthony J. DeLaurentis, P.A.; William M. O’Connell, P.A.; John K. Reiff, P.A.; Jack E. Reid; DeLaurentis, Reiff & Reid, LLC; Ron Sroka, P.A.; Benjamin Zajdel; Stanley Al pert, P.A.; Heidi S. Kenny, P.A.; Karen M. Authement, P.A.; Mary F. Keenan, Assistant Solicitor; Kyriakos Marudas, Assistant Solicitor; A.J. Billig Auctioneers, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 12-2257.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 17, 2013.
Decided: Jan. 22, 2013.
Reginald Lee, Appellant Pro Se.
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Reginald L. Lee appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil complaint for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lee v. Mayor & City Council of Balt., No. 1:12-cv-02418-JKB (D.Md. filed Sept. 14, 2012; entered Sept. 17, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
D.C. Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 103 S.Ct. 1303, 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983); Rooker v. Fid. Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413, 44 S.Ct. 149, 68 L.Ed. 362 (1923).