Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Frankie Celso VILLAGRAN-PECINA, also known as Antonio Quintanilla, also known as Frankie Villagran, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-10-22
Citations: 620 F. App'x 333
Docket Number: No. 15-40489
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Frankie Celso VILLAGRAN-PECINA, also known as Antonio Quintanilla, also known as Frankie Villagran, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 620
Pages: 333–334

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Frankie Celso VILLAGRAN-PECINA, also known as Antonio Quintanilla, also known as Frankie Villagran, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-40489
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Oct. 22, 2015.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Scott Andrew Martin, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Frankie Celso Villagran-Pecina raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Martinez-Lugo, 782 F.3d 198, 204-05 (5th Cir.2015), petition for cert. filed (June 19, 2015) (No. 14-10355). In Martinez-Lugo, 782 F.3d at 204-05, we held that an enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(i) for a prior conviction of a drug trafficking offense is warranted regardless whether the convic- • tion for the prior offense required proof of remuneration or commercial activity. Accordingly, Villagran-Pecina's unopposed motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.