Case Name: Charles C. Jacquin, Respondent, v. Syracuse Auto Rental and Taxicab Corporation and Another, Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1933-04
Citations: 239 A.D. 807
Docket Number: 
Parties: Charles C. Jacquin, Respondent, v. Syracuse Auto Rental and Taxicab Corporation and Another, Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 239
Pages: 807–807

Head Matter:
Charles C. Jacquin, Respondent, v. Syracuse Auto Rental and Taxicab Corporation and Another, Appellants.
Revd., 263 N. Y. 53.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We are of the opinion that the judgment appealed from is correct. (Gochee v. Wagner, 232 App. Div. 401, 403; revd. on other grounds, 257 N. Y. 344.) If an appeal had been taken from the judgment entered pursuant to the verdict directed at the trial we would have the power to reverse it and grant the same judgment now here on appeal (Civ. Prac, Act, § 584), both parties having moved for a direction of a verdict. Therefore, we have decided to overlook any irregularity in the practice followed at Special Term — and to reach what we deem to be a correct result by affirming the judgment appealed from. All concur. Judgment affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party.