Case Name: Stoney William AULT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. William S. HAINES, Warden, Huttonsville Correctional Center, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-06-08
Citations: 184 F. App'x 339
Docket Number: No. 05-7595
Parties: Stoney William AULT, Petitioner—Appellant, v. William S. HAINES, Warden, Huttonsville Correctional Center, Respondent—Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 184
Pages: 339–339

Head Matter:
Stoney William AULT, Petitioner—Appellant, v. William S. HAINES, Warden, Huttonsville Correctional Center, Respondent—Appellee.
No. 05-7595.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 24, 2006.
Decided: June 8, 2006.
Stoney William Ault, Appellant Pro Se. Dawn Ellen Warfield, Office of the Attorney General of West Virginia, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 86(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Stoney William Ault, a state prisoner, appeals the district court's order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Ault v. Haines, No. CA-04-94 (N.D.W.Va. Sept. 30, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.