Case Name: John R. Upshaw v. W. D. Carbelt, et al.
Court: Kentucky Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Kentucky
Decision Date: 1871-01-05
Citations: 4 Ky. Op. 168
Docket Number: 
Parties: John R. Upshaw v. W. D. Carbelt, et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Kentucky Opinions, containing the unreported opinions of the Court of Appeals
Volume: 4
Pages: 168–168

Head Matter:
John R. Upshaw v. W. D. Carbelt, et al.
Garnishment — Answer of Garnishee — Oral Examination Not Required— Depositions.
A garnishee has the right to appear in person and he examined orally or answer in writing, and if he adopts the latter mode he cannot be compelled to appear in person, after a transfer of the case to equity, to undergo an examination before the court, unless he is in contempt of court for failing to make a sufficient answer. His testimony should have been obtained by deposition.
APPEAL PROM PULTON CIRCUIT COURT.
January 5, 1871.
Goalder James, for appellant.
Randle & Tyler, for appellee.

Opinion:
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Hardin :
If the appellant, was, as is insisted, only before tbe court as an ordinary garnishee, be bad a right, under section 245 of tbe Civil Code, to appear in person and be examined orally, or answer in writing, and if be adopted tbe latter mode, be should not have been compelled to appear in person, after tbe transfer of tbe case to equity, to undergo an examination before tbe court, unless be was in contempt of court for failing to make a sufficient answer. But as tbe appellant was in this case formally made a defendant in tbe action, and properly so as tbe court decided on the demurrer, and tbe case was on tbe plaintiff's motion, transferred to equity, so far as appellant was concerned, the case should have remained for preparation and trial as any other suit in equity according to tbe provision of tbe code, and if tbe testimony of tbe appellant was desired it should have been obtained by bis deposition or upon interrogatories before tbe final bearing, and it was both irregular and premature to force him into court to give oral testimony, and try tbe case on tbe result of that examination before tbe action stood for trial according to tbe rules of equity practiced and within the time allowed to parties for preparation.
Wherefore tbe judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.