Case Name: William M. Reed, Respondent, v. N. E. Vail & Co., Inc., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1924-12
Citations: 211 A.D. 868
Docket Number: 
Parties: William M. Reed, Respondent, v. N. E. Vail & Co., Inc., Appellant.
Judges: Present — Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Young, JJ.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 211
Pages: 868–868

Head Matter:
William M. Reed, Respondent, v. N. E. Vail & Co., Inc., Appellant.

Opinion:
Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.. While it was error to strike out testimony given by plaintiff on his -examination in supplementary proceedings, we think it was not prejudicial to the defendant, as other testimony on the same subject was subsequently received.
Present — Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Young, JJ.