Case Name: Helen Wilson, Respondent, v. Margaret Hogan, Defendant, and Timothy Hogan, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1899-12
Citations: 30 Misc. 763
Docket Number: 
Parties: Helen Wilson, Respondent, v. Margaret Hogan, Defendant, and Timothy Hogan, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 30
Pages: 763–763

Head Matter:
Helen Wilson, Respondent, v. Margaret Hogan, Defendant, and Timothy Hogan, Appellant.
Appeal by the defendant, Timothy Hogan, from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, .rendered in the Municipal Court, sixth district, borough of Manhattan.
Edward G. Whitaker, for appellant.
Ellis B. Southworth, for respondent.

Opinion:
MacLean, J.
As it does not appear upon the record that the defendant resided within the jurisdiction of the court below, the judgment must be reversed, even if a collocation of the evidence may establish the " home " of the defendant to have been " Eighty-sixth street," in whatever locality that may be, for that does not sufficiently establish residence within the jurisdiction. Frees v. Ford, 6 N. Y. 176; Gilbert v. York, 111 id. 544.
Freedman, P. J., and Leventbitt, J., concur.
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.