Case Name: A.D.A., a Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-07-31
Citations: 564 So. 2d 615
Docket Number: No. 90-598
Parties: A.D.A., a Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: WENTWORTH and ALLEN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 564
Pages: 615–616

Head Matter:
A.D.A., a Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 90-598.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
July 31, 1990.
Michael M. Naughton, Jacksonville, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., William A. Hatch, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Opinion:
NIMMONS, Judge.
Appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying the appellant's motion for judgment of acquittal. We disagree. However, the term of community control imposed by the court is in excess of that permitted by law.
This juvenile was charged with and found guilty of petit theft. As we have previously held, the maximum period of community control which may be imposed for petit theft is 60 days. J.S. v. State, 552 So.2d 327 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). As we stated in J.S., this result is dictated by the provisions of Sections 39.11(l)(a)l. and 39.-11(4), Florida Statutes.
Accordingly, the subject disposition order is affirmed except for the term of community control as to which the order is re versed and remanded for the entry of an amended order consistent with this opinion.
WENTWORTH and ALLEN, JJ., concur.