Case Name: Betty O. Muka, Appellant, et al., Plaintiff, v. Thomas R. Emnett, Respondent; Betty O. Muka, Appellant, et al., Plaintiff, v. Robert Simpson, Respondent; Betty O. Muka, Appellant, et al., Plaintiff, v. Emnett and Simpson, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1990-06-14
Citations: 76 N.Y.2d 769
Docket Number: 
Parties: Betty O. Muka, Appellant, et al., Plaintiff, v Thomas R. Emnett, Respondent. Betty O. Muka, Appellant, et al., Plaintiff, v Robert Simpson, Respondent. Betty O. Muka, Appellant, et al., Plaintiff, v Emnett and Simpson, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 76
Pages: 769–769

Head Matter:
Betty O. Muka, Appellant, et al., Plaintiff, v Thomas R. Emnett, Respondent. Betty O. Muka, Appellant, et al., Plaintiff, v Robert Simpson, Respondent. Betty O. Muka, Appellant, et al., Plaintiff, v Emnett and Simpson, Respondent.
Submitted April 23, 1990;
decided June 14, 1990

Opinion:
On the court's own motion, appeals transferred, without costs, to the Appellate Division, Third Department, each upon the ground that a direct appeal does not lie when questions other than the constitutional validity of a statutory provision are involved (NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b] [2]; § 5 [b]; CPLR 5601 [b] [2]). Motion for waiver of strict compliance with this court's Rules of Practice dismissed as academic.