Case Name: Perfect Care, Inc., Respondent, v. Ultracare Supplies, Inc., et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2010-03-09
Citations: 71 A.D.3d 752
Docket Number: 
Parties: Perfect Care, Inc., Respondent, v Ultracare Supplies, Inc., et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 71
Pages: 752–753

Head Matter:
Perfect Care, Inc., Respondent, v Ultracare Supplies, Inc., et al., Appellants.
[895 NYS2d 748]

Opinion:
In an action, inter alia, to set aside a transfer of assets as fraudulent, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Adams, J.), entered March 17, 2009, which denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (1) to vacate an order of the same court entered December 9, 2008, granting the plaintiffs unopposed motion for leave to enter a default judgment against them in the principal sum of $87,776.09.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
To obtain vacatur of an order entered upon their default in answering the complaint, the defendants were required to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for their failure to serve an answer and a meritorious defense to the action (see CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Forward Door of N.Y., Inc. v Forlader, 41 AD3d 535 [2007]; Piton v Cribb, 38 AD3d 741 [2007]; Fekete v Camp Skwere, 16 AD3d 544, 545 [2005]). The determination of what constitutes a reasonable excuse lies within the trial court's discretion (see Santiago v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 10 AD3d 393, 394 [2004]; Roussodimou v Zafiriadis, 238 AD2d 568, 569 [1997]; Grutman v Southgate At Bar Harbor Home Owners' Assn., 207 AD2d 526, 527 [1994]). We agree with the Supreme Court's determination that the defendants failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for their default. Fisher, J.P., Santucci, Angiolillo and Lott, JJ., concur.