Case Name: HOADLEY, Respondent, v. LEOPOLD et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1904-04-08
Citations: 87 N.Y.S. 1136
Docket Number: 
Parties: HOADLEY, Respondent, v. LEOPOLD et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 87
Pages: 1136–1136

Head Matter:
HOADLEY, Respondent, v. LEOPOLD et al., Appellants.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
April 8, 1904.)
Action by Alfred H. Hoadley against James Leopold and another. From an interlocutory order restraining defendants pendente lite from selling certain stocks, they appeal. Affirmed.
Court-land V. Anable, for appellants.
William N. Cohen, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We think that the questions involved should be disposed of at the trial, and not upon affidavits; and without, therefore, considering or passing upon the merits, which should be left until the trial can be had, we think that the injunction order should remain. Accordingly, the order appealed from is affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to abide the event.