Case Name: Roderick D. Grant, appellant, v. Steenland Construction Company et al., respondents
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1927-01-31
Citations: 100 N.J. Eq. 566
Docket Number: 
Parties: Roderick D. Grant, appellant, v. Steenland Construction Company et al., respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 100
Pages: 566–566

Head Matter:
Roderick D. Grant, appellant, v. Steenland Construction Company et al., respondents.
[Decided January 31st, 1927.]
Mr. Andrew J. Whinnery, for the appellant.
Messrs. Morrison, Lloyd & Morrison, for the respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the conrt below by Vice-Chancellor Baches.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Min-turn, KLalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, JJ. 11. .
For reversal — None.