Case Name: Karouzin Mardiros, Respondent, v. Nabil Ghaly et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1991-07-12
Citations: 175 A.D.2d 680
Docket Number: Appeal No. 1
Parties: Karouzin Mardiros, Respondent, v Nabil Ghaly et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 175
Pages: 680–680

Head Matter:
Karouzin Mardiros, Respondent, v Nabil Ghaly et al., Appellants.
(Appeal No. 1.)

Opinion:
— Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in finding that plaintiff's responses to designated items in defendants' demand for a bill of particulars were sufficient. The court's order denying defendants' motion for reargument is not appealable (see, Fahey v County of Nassau, 111 AD2d 214). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Suffolk County, Baisley, J. — Preclusion Order.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.