Case Name: Kenny HALFACRE, Plaintiff-Appellant v. ARKANSAS BOARD OF CORRECTION; Randall Watson, Warden, ADC, Varner Unit; Raymond Naylor, Disciplinary Hearing Administrator, ADC, Central Office; K. Waddle, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, ADC, Central Office; J. Minor, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, ADC, Central Office; Ms. Franklin; Ms. Taylor, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, ADC, Central Office; Does, Disciplinary Hearing Officers, ADC, Central Office, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-03-03
Citations: 637 F. App'x 964
Docket Number: No. 15-3132
Parties: Kenny HALFACRE, Plaintiff-Appellant v. ARKANSAS BOARD OF CORRECTION; Randall Watson, Warden, ADC, Varner Unit; Raymond Naylor, Disciplinary Hearing Administrator, ADC, Central Office; K. Waddle, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, ADC, Central Office; J. Minor, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, ADC, Central Office; Ms. Franklin; Ms. Taylor, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, ADC, Central Office; Does, Disciplinary Hearing Officers, ADC, Central Office, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WOLLMAN, ARNOLD, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 637
Pages: 964–965

Head Matter:
Kenny HALFACRE, Plaintiff-Appellant v. ARKANSAS BOARD OF CORRECTION; Randall Watson, Warden, ADC, Varner Unit; Raymond Naylor, Disciplinary Hearing Administrator, ADC, Central Office; K. Waddle, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, ADC, Central Office; J. Minor, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, ADC, Central Office; Ms. Franklin; Ms. Taylor, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, ADC, Central Office; Does, Disciplinary Hearing Officers, ADC, Central Office, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15-3132.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 29, 2016.
Filed: March 3, 2016.
Kenny Halfacre, Grady, AR, pro se.
Before WOLLMAN, ARNOLD, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Kenny Halfacre appeals the district court's preservice dismissal, without prejudice, of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action based on alleged deprivations of his liberty interests. Having carefully reviewed the record and Halfacre's arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir.2000) (per curiam) (28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) dismissal is reviewed de novo); see also Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 483-84, 115 S.Ct. 2293, 132 L.Ed.2d 418 (1995) (alleged deprivation of liberty interest must impose atypical and significant hardship in relation to ordinary incidents of prison life); Phillips v. Norris, 320 F.3d 844, 846-47 (8th Cir.2003) (demotion to segregation, even without cause, is not itself atypical and significant hardship; prisoner has no federal constitutional liberty interest in having prison officials follow prison regulations); cf. Moody v. Daggett, 429 U.S. 78, 88 n. 9, 97 S.Ct. 274, 50 L.Ed.2d 236 (1976) (federal prisoner had no statutory or constitutional entitlement to particular classification). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Kristine G. Baker, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Beth Deere, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.