Case Name: The State of Ohio, Appellant, v. Radey, Appellee
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1990-06-27
Citations: 52 Ohio St. 3d 87
Docket Number: No. 89-995
Parties: The State of Ohio, Appellant, v. Radey, Appellee.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Re snick, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 52
Pages: 87–87

Head Matter:
The State of Ohio, Appellant, v. Radey, Appellee.
[Cite as State v. Radey (1990), 52 Ohio St. 3d 87.]
(No. 89-995
Submitted May 16, 1990
Decided June 27, 1990.)
John J. Lohn, city prosecutor, for appellant.
James L. Wagner, for appellee.

Opinion:
This cause came before the court upon the certification of the court of appeals that its judgment conflicted with the judgment of the Court of Appeals for Franklin County in State v. Wolfe (1987), 41 Ohio App. 3d 119, 534 N.E. 2d 920, upon the following question:
"[W]hether the activities depicted in [the] material [in question] must fall within the definition of sexual conduct as set out in R.C. 2907.01[A] in order for the materials to be considered obscene under constitutional standards."
We find that the judgments of the courts of appeals do not conflict on the certified question. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. State v. Parobek (1990), 49 Ohio St. 3d 61, 550 N.E. 2d 476, and cases cited therein.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Re snick, JJ., concur.