Case Name: Willie McCRAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-10-11
Citations: 769 So. 2d 1126
Docket Number: No. 4D00-2998
Parties: Willie McCRAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: DELL, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 769
Pages: 1126–1126

Head Matter:
Willie McCRAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D00-2998.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Oct. 11, 2000.
Willie McCray, Graeeville, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The order denying appellant's post-conviction motion is hereby affirmed. Appellant entered a plea that provided for a specific sentence, with the understanding that the sentence was an upward departure from the 1995 sentencing guidelines. We agree with the trial court that appellant cannot now claim that his sentence was adversely affected by the amendment to the 1995 sentencing guidelines in order to qualify for resentencing under Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000).
Appellant's claim of additional gain time must be raised in an appropriate administrative proceeding. See Allen v. State, 768 So.2d 1168 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Clements v. State, 761 So.2d 1245 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). Affirmance is without prejudice to do so.
DELL, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.