Case Name: Howell W. WOLTZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dennis BAILEY, individually and in his official capacity; James Pendergraph, individually and in his official capacity; Mecklenburg County Jail, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-08-04
Citations: 390 F. App'x 223
Docket Number: No. 09-7119
Parties: Howell W. WOLTZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dennis BAILEY, individually and in his official capacity; James Pendergraph, individually and in his official capacity; Mecklenburg County Jail, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 390
Pages: 223–224

Head Matter:
Howell W. WOLTZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dennis BAILEY, individually and in his official capacity; James Pendergraph, individually and in his official capacity; Mecklenburg County Jail, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 09-7119.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 27, 2010.
Decided: Aug. 4, 2010.
Howell W. Woltz, Appellant pro se.
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Howell W. Woltz appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Woltz v. Bailey, No. 3:09-ev-00211-GCM, 2009 WL 1564142 (W.D.N.C. June 1, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.