Case Name: Joseph SMITH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2019-01-23
Citations: 260 So. 3d 578
Docket Number: No. 3D18-0991
Parties: Joseph SMITH, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before EMAS, C.J., and HENDON, J., and LAGOA, Associate Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 260
Pages: 578–578

Head Matter:
Joseph SMITH, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D18-0991
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Opinion filed January 23, 2019
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Shannon Hemmendinger, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, and Gabrielle Raemy Charest-Turken, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before EMAS, C.J., and HENDON, J., and LAGOA, Associate Judge.
ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

Opinion:
LAGOA, Associate Judge.
Joseph Smith ("Smith") appeals his conviction and sentence for possession of a controlled substance, possession of drug paraphernalia, and resisting an officer without violence, arguing that his trial was fundamentally flawed due to the trial court's failure to instruct the jury as to reasonable doubt. As the State correctly concedes, the trial court's failure to instruct the jury as to Florida Standard Jury Instruction (Criminal) 3.7 Plea of Not Guilty; Reasonable Doubt, and Burden of Proof, or any similar instruction, constituted fundamental error. See Cavagnaro v. State, 117 So.3d 1111, 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (finding fundamental error where the jury charge did not include Florida Standard Jury Instruction (Criminal) 3.7 or any similar instruction); see also Curry v. State, 169 So.3d 1258, 1258 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) ; Burnette v. State, 103 So.3d 1059 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013). Accordingly, we reverse Smith's conviction and remand for a new trial.
Reversed and remanded.