Case Name: Lawrence C. AGEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Colette DUMONT, Chittenden County, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-04-09
Citations: 32 F. App'x 614
Docket Number: Docket No. 01-9281
Parties: Lawrence C. AGEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Colette DUMONT, Chittenden County, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 32
Pages: 614–615

Head Matter:
Lawrence C. AGEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Colette DUMONT, Chittenden County, Defendants-Appellees.
Docket No. 01-9281.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
April 9, 2002.
Lawrence C. Agee pro se, Auburn, CA, for Appellant.
John R. Durrance, Jr., Gaston, Durrance & Fairbanks, Montpelier, VT, for Appellee Dumont.
Pietro J. Lynn, Burlington, VT, for Appellee Chittenden County.
Present NEWMAN, L. KEARSE, and B.D. PARKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
SUMMARY ORDER
This cause came on to be heard on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Vermont, and was submitted by appellant pro se and by counsel for appellees.
ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is now hereby ordered, adjudged, and de creed that the judgment of said District Court be and it hereby is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Sessions's Order dated October 9, 2001, adopting the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Niedermeier dated September 18, 2001.
Plaintiffs contentions on this appeal have been waived because he made no objection to the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation, and in any event, his contentions have no merit. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.