Case Name: Cathy L. SCHMIDT, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Michael C. SCHMIDT, Respondent/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1992-10-27
Citations: 838 S.W.2d 522
Docket Number: No. 60976
Parties: Cathy L. SCHMIDT, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Michael C. SCHMIDT, Respondent/Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 838
Pages: 522–522

Head Matter:
Cathy L. SCHMIDT, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Michael C. SCHMIDT, Respondent/Appellant.
No. 60976.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Southern Division.
Oct. 27, 1992.
Jeffrey P. Hine, Oliver, Oliver, Waltz & Cook, P.C., Cape Girardeau, for respondent, appellant.
David G. Beeson, Michael L. Jackson, Jackson, for petitioner, respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Husband appeals from decree of dissolution which dissolved a nine-year marriage between the parties.
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b). •