Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark Richard EVERROAD, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-10-22
Citations: 111 F. App'x 928
Docket Number: No. 03-30332
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark Richard EVERROAD, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 111
Pages: 928–928

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark Richard EVERROAD, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 03-30332.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 14, 2004.
Decided Oct. 22, 2004.
Before: KLEINFELD, TASHIMA and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Mark Richard Everroad appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 108-month sentence imposed for conspiracy to commit bank robbery, armed bank robbery and use and carrying of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, 2113(a) and (d) and 924(c)(l)(A)(ii).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Everroad has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief.
Accordingly, we GRANT counsel's motion to withdraw and AFFIRM the district court's judgment.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.