Case Name: Doris Jane MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1975-01-10
Citations: 305 So. 2d 826
Docket Number: No. 73-594
Parties: Doris Jane MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: OWEN, C. J., and MAGER, J., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 305
Pages: 826–827

Head Matter:
Doris Jane MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 73-594.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jan. 10, 1975.
Edward F. Keezel, II, and Emmett A. Moran of Emmett A. Moran, P.A., Alta-monte Springs, for appellant.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Michael M. Corin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Thomas M. Carney, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Upon a review of the briefs, the record on appeal and having heard oral argument, we are of the opinion that appellant has demonstrated reversible error with respect to the proposition that the judgment of contempt fails to comply with the provisions of Rule 3.840(a)(6), FRCrP, and with respect to the imposition of a sentence to hard labor. The judgment did not include a recital of the facts constituting the contempt upon which the appellant was found and adjudicated guilty; moreover, a person convicted of criminal contempt may not be sentenced to hard labor. Moore v. State, Fla.App. 1971, 245 So.2d 880; State ex rel. Saunders v. Boyer, Fla. App.1964, 166 So.2d 694. We find no merit, however, to the appellant's other contentions. Accordingly, for the foregoing reasons the judgment and sentence are set aside and the cause remanded to the trial court for the entry of a proper judgment and sentence consistent herewith.
OWEN, C. J., and MAGER, J., concur.
CROSS, J., concurs in part, and dissents in part, with opinion.