Case Name: Donald J. TYNER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Frank C. SIZER, Jr., Warden; Attorney General for the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-12-31
Citations: 54 F. App'x 145
Docket Number: No. 02-7120
Parties: Donald J. TYNER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Frank C. SIZER, Jr., Warden; Attorney General for the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 54
Pages: 145–146

Head Matter:
Donald J. TYNER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Frank C. SIZER, Jr., Warden; Attorney General for the State of Maryland, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 02-7120.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 19, 2002.
Decided Dec. 31, 2002.
Donald J. Tyner, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Mary Ann Rapp Ince, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Donald J. Tyner seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) . An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability -will not issue for claims addressed by a district court on the merits absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000); see Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 941, 122 S.Ct. 318, 151 L.Ed.2d 237 (2001) . We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Tyner has not made the requisite showing. See Tyner v. Sizer, No. CA-00-1426-L (D. Md. June 28, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED