Case Name: CITY OF PITTSBURGH, Respondent v. FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, FORT PITT LODGE NO. 1, Petitioner
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2005-11-30
Citations: 886 A.2d 682
Docket Number: 
Parties: CITY OF PITTSBURGH, Respondent v. FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, FORT PITT LODGE NO. 1, Petitioner.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 886
Pages: 682–682

Head Matter:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, Respondent v. FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, FORT PITT LODGE NO. 1, Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Nov. 30, 2005.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 29th day of November, 2005, the Petition for Alowance of Appeal is hereby granted, limited to the following issue:
Whether the Commonwealth Court's decision permitting the reduction of post-retirement healthcare benefits for active officers conflicts with the Supreme Court decision in Appeal of Upper Providence Twp?
The order of the Commonwealth Court is vacated insofar as it resolved the post retirement health care benefits issue, and the case is remanded to the Commonwealth Court for consideration and analysis of this Court's decision in Appeal of Upper Providence Township, 514 Pa. 501, 526 A.2d 315 (1987).