Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Anthony Waring, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2013-03-06
Citations: 104 A.D.3d 711
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Waring, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 104
Pages: 711–712

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Waring, Appellant.
[960 NYS2d 323]

Opinion:
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Calabrese, J.), rendered November 13, 2008, convicting him of sexual abuse in the first degree (three counts) and criminal mischief in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Hawkins, 11 NY3d 484 [2008]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]; People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342 [2007]), we nevertheless accord great deference to the jury's opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor (see People v Mateo, 2 NY3d 383, 410 [2004], cert denied 542 US 946 [2004]; People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]).
The defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, are without merit. Skelos, J.R, Leventhal, Hall and Sgroi, JJ., concur.