Case Name: James L. DeROSA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Randall G. WORKMAN, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-09-11
Citations: 696 F.3d 1302
Docket Number: No. 10-7084
Parties: James L. DeROSA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Randall G. WORKMAN, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before BRISCOE, Chief Judge, KELLY, LUCERO, MURPHY, HARTZ, O’BRIEN, TYMKOVICH, GORSUCH, HOLMES, and MATHESON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 696
Pages: 1302–1306

Head Matter:
James L. DeROSA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Randall G. WORKMAN, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 10-7084.
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
Sept. 11, 2012.
D.Ct. No. 6:05-CV-00213-JHP-SPS.
Patti Palmer Ghezzi, Thomas David Hird, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Oklahoma City, OK, for Petitioner-Appellant.
Jennifer L. Crabb, Office of the Attorney General for the State of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, for Respondent-Appellee.
Before BRISCOE, Chief Judge, KELLY, LUCERO, MURPHY, HARTZ, O’BRIEN, TYMKOVICH, GORSUCH, HOLMES, and MATHESON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
This matter is before the court on petitioner's Petition for Rehearing En Bane and/or Panel Rehearing. We also have a response, as well as a reply. The original panel has considered the request for panel rehearing, as well as the other pleadings on file, and that request is denied.
The entire petition, as well as the response and reply, were also circulated to all the judges of the court who are in regular active service. A poll was called, and a majority of the court voted to deny the en banc request. Consequently, the petition for en banc hearing is also denied. See Fed. R. App. P. 35(a). Judges Lucero and Hartz voted to allow en banc reconsideration.