Case Name: In the Matter of Bertha Hertzberg, Respondent, against Morris Hertzberg, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1936-05-01
Citations: 247 A.D. 351
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Bertha Hertzberg, Respondent, against Morris Hertzberg, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 247
Pages: 351–352

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Bertha Hertzberg, Respondent, against Morris Hertzberg, Appellant.
First Department,
May 1, 1936.
Murray Kurman, for the appellant.
Arthur Bainbridge Hoff, Jr., of counsel [Paxton Blair with him on the brief; Paul Windels, Corporation Counsel, attorney], for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The record contains no proof of the marriage of the parties upon which a finding may be based that defendant under the law owes petitioner support and maintenance. We are consequently unable to support the ruling made in the Domestic Relations Court, and it should be reversed and a new hearing ordered.
Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O'Malley, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ.
Order unanimously reversed and a new hearing ordered.