Case Name: John EDMOND; Pamela Lyles, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Edward MAHER; Judy Nigh; Snowden Chase Realty, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-04-29
Citations: 275 F. App'x 254
Docket Number: No. 08-1061
Parties: John EDMOND; Pamela Lyles, Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. Edward MAHER; Judy Nigh; Snowden Chase Realty, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 275
Pages: 254–255

Head Matter:
John EDMOND; Pamela Lyles, Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. Edward MAHER; Judy Nigh; Snowden Chase Realty, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 08-1061.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 24, 2008.
Decided: April 29, 2008.
John Edmond, Pamela Lyles, Appellants Pro Se. William Leonard Mitchell, II, Ec-cleston & Wolf, P.C., Washington, D.C.; Juliane Corroon Miller, Hudgins Law Firm, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
John Edmond and Pamela Lyles appeal from the district court's order dismissing their civil action on the grounds of res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Edmond v. Maher, No. 8:07-cv-02883-DKC (D.Md. Nov. 13, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.