Case Name: Uche AMADI, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-04-01
Citations: 124 F. App'x 806
Docket Number: No. 04-1239
Parties: Uche AMADI, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before WILLIAMS, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 124
Pages: 806–807

Head Matter:
Uche AMADI, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 04-1239.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 16, 2005.
Decided: April 1, 2005.
Lloyd F. Ukwu, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner.
Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Papú Sandhu, Senior Litigation Counsel, Isaac R. Campbell, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Before WILLIAMS, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Uche Amadi petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reconsider and reopen. Having reviewed the decision of the Board and the administrative record, we conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reconsider and reopen. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2004) (providing the grant or denial of a motion to reopen or reconsider is within the Board's discretion); INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24, 112 S.Ct. 719, 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992); Stewart v. INS, 181 F.3d 587, 595, 596 (4th Cir.1999). Therefore, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED