Case Name: Ernest Baker, Respondent, v. George A. Welcome, Sr., and George A. Welcome, Jr., Doing Business under the Style and Name of George A. Welcome and Son Bus Line, Impleaded with Thomas Hallinan, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1921-01
Citations: 195 A.D. 913
Docket Number: 
Parties: Ernest Baker, Respondent, v. George A. Welcome, Sr., and George A. Welcome, Jr., Doing Business under the Style and Name of George A. Welcome and Son Bus Line, Impleaded with Thomas Hallinan, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 195
Pages: 913–913

Head Matter:
Ernest Baker, Respondent, v. George A. Welcome, Sr., and George A. Welcome, Jr., Doing Business under the Style and Name of George A. Welcome and Son Bus Line, Impleaded with Thomas Hallinan, Appellant.

Opinion:
Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs, the court determining that if there was a technical error in the charge it was not prejudicial and should be disregarded under section 1317 of the Code of Civil Procedure.