Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Salvador NAVARRO-GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-07-20
Citations: 139 F. App'x 895
Docket Number: No. 03-30442
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Salvador NAVARRO-GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before FERGUSON, TROTT, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 139
Pages: 895–895

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Salvador NAVARRO-GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 03-30442.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
July 20, 2005.
Douglas W. Fong, Esq., U.S. Attorney’s Office, Medford, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Tonia L. Moro, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Medford, OR, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before FERGUSON, TROTT, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
We remand the sentence imposed in this case to the district court, without vacating the sentence, to follow the procedure established in the en banc decision of United States v. Ameline, and to consider whether the sentence would have been materially different in light of United States v. Booker.
REMANDED.
. United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc).
. United States v. Booker, -U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).