Case Name: THARP v. STATE OF FLORIDA
Court: Florida Circuit Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1991-04-17
Citations: 47 Fla. Supp. 2d 69
Docket Number: Case No. 89-333AC
Parties: THARP v STATE OF FLORIDA
Judges: Before SHAPIRO, ROTHENBERG, KORNBLUM, JJ.
Reporter: Florida Supplement Second
Volume: 47
Pages: 69–70

Head Matter:
THARP v STATE OF FLORIDA
Case No. 89-333AC
Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Dade County
April 17, 1991
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Sheridan K. Weissenborn, Esquire, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Angelica D. Zayas, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SHAPIRO, ROTHENBERG, KORNBLUM, JJ.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROTHENBERG, J.
We have considered the arguments of the parties upon the facts presented.
In Armstrong v State, 364 So.2d 1238 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978), the District Court held that it is error to give the "Allen charge", first announced in Allen v United States, 164 U.S. 492, 17 S.Ct. 154, 41 L.Ed. 528 (1896), to resolve jury deadlock, in the absence of a deadlocked jury. Here the facts reveal no indication of deadlock arising from any quarter. The deadlock charge should not have been given and it is upon this point that we reverse.
We have considered the other points on appeal raised by appellant and find that they are without merit and pose no bar to further prosecution of the matter in the court below.
We reverse and remand for a new trial.
SHAPIRO and KORNBLUM, JJ., concur.