Case Name: John Lonero et al., Doing Business as Lonero Studio, Appellants, v. Kewaunee Scientific Equipment Corporation, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1979-04-16
Citations: 69 A.D.2d 852
Docket Number: 
Parties: John Lonero et al., Doing Business as Lonero Studio, Appellants, v Kewaunee Scientific Equipment Corporation, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 69
Pages: 852–852

Head Matter:
John Lonero et al., Doing Business as Lonero Studio, Appellants, v Kewaunee Scientific Equipment Corporation, Respondent.

Opinion:
In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated February 3, 1978, as, upon granting their motion for reargument of their prior motion for summary judgment, denied their motion, granted judgment in favor of defendant and dismissed the complaint. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements, and summary judgment is denied to both parties. The key to summary judgment is issue finding rather than issue determination (see Esteve v Abad, 271 App Div 725). In the present action an agreement was entered into whereby the appellants were to prepare a catalogue for the respondent. Upon acceptance of the catalogue they were to receive $5,000. They were also to receive 1% of the total sales of equipment of the type advertised in the catalogue. The appellants prepared the catalogue and were paid $5,000. Subsequently, the respondent decided, as a business judgment, not to print, publish or distribute the catalogue. Although there was no express obligation to print the catalogue the appellants claim that the obligation was implied under the agreement. There are questions of fact with respect to the agreement and its meaning and thus summary judgment is not warranted. Lazer, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.