Case Name: MARLYN REALTY COMPANY, RELATOR, v. TOWN OF WEST ORANGE ET AL., DEFENDANTS
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1927-03-10
Citations: 5 N.J. Misc. 342
Docket Number: 
Parties: MARLYN REALTY COMPANY, RELATOR, v. TOWN OF WEST ORANGE ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 5
Pages: 342–342

Head Matter:
MARLYN REALTY COMPANY, RELATOR, v. TOWN OF WEST ORANGE ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
Submitted January 28, 1927
Decided March 10, 1927.
Before Justices Parker, Black and Campbell.
Eor the relator, Rowe & Davis.
For the defendants, Alfred J. Grosso.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This is a zoning ordinance case. Eelator asks a mandamus for a permit to build in disregard of the limitations imposed by the ordinance.
It appears that the town of West Orange has a board of adjustment, as contemplated by Pamph. L. 1926, p. 526, and that relator did not appeal to that board.
Following the decision in Chancellor Development Corp. v. Senior, 134 Atl. Rep. 337; 4 N. J. Mis. R. 633, mandamus at this stage will be refused and the rule to show cause will be discharged, with costs.
Other similar cases are Letz & Katz v. Ackerman, 5 N. J. Mis. R. 169; Burg v. Ackerman, Id. 96; Bilt-Wel Co. v. Crange, Id. 180; Paramount Realty Co. v. Schmitt, Id. 177.