Case Name: STEADFAST INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. PARK IMAGING, INC., a Florida corporation; Park Diagnostic Imaging Center, Inc., a Florida corporation; and NMC Diagnostic Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2001-02-21
Citations: 778 So. 2d 478
Docket Number: Nos. 4D00-2538, 4D00-795
Parties: STEADFAST INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. PARK IMAGING, INC., a Florida corporation; Park Diagnostic Imaging Center, Inc., a Florida corporation; and NMC Diagnostic Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Appellees.
Judges: WARNER, C.J., FARMER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 778
Pages: 478–479

Head Matter:
STEADFAST INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. PARK IMAGING, INC., a Florida corporation; Park Diagnostic Imaging Center, Inc., a Florida corporation; and NMC Diagnostic Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Appellees.
Nos. 4D00-2538, 4D00-795.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb. 21, 2001.
Neil L. Sambursky, Bradley S. Fischer and Barry S. Bendetowies of Melito & Adolfsen, P.C., New York and Fort Laud-erdale, for appellant.
R. Hugh Lumpkin and Jason S. Mazer of Ver Ploeg & Lumpkin, Miami, for appel-lees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Because the trial court did not err in reaching judgment for the reasons stated in its amended final judgment, we see no reason to discuss the alternative theories argued on appeal that equally support the judgment.
AFFIRMED.
WARNER, C.J., FARMER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.