Case Name: Bernard KESSLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF PHOENIX; Roxanne Song Ong, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-07-20
Citations: 14 F. App'x 921
Docket Number: No. 00-16040; D.C. No. CV-97-00669-EHC
Parties: Bernard KESSLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF PHOENIX; Roxanne Song Ong, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 14
Pages: 921–921

Head Matter:
Bernard KESSLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF PHOENIX; Roxanne Song Ong, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 00-16040.
D.C. No. CY-97-00669-EHC.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 9, 2001.
Decided July 20, 2001.
Before KOZINSKI, T.G. NELSON, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, Kessler's request for oral argument is denied.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Bernard Kessler appeals pro se from the district court's order denying his motions for preliminary injunctions. Kessler's appeal is moot because Kessler only appeals the preliminary injunction decisions in an action the district court has entirely dismissed through entry of final judgment. See Taylor v. United States, 181 F.3d 1017,1022-23 (9th Cir.1999).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.