Case Name: Garry D. ACUNCIUS, Appellant/Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF AUDRAIN, Respondent/Defendant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1994-07-19
Citations: 878 S.W.2d 930
Docket Number: No. 64368
Parties: Garry D. ACUNCIUS, Appellant/Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF AUDRAIN, Respondent/Defendant.
Judges: Before CRIST, P.J., and CRANDALL and CRANE, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 878
Pages: 930–930

Head Matter:
Garry D. ACUNCIUS, Appellant/Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF AUDRAIN, Respondent/Defendant.
No. 64368.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Northern Division.
July 19, 1994.
Michael F. Dandino, Jerome Wallaeh, Wal-lach Law Firm, St. Louis, for appellant.
Thomas I. Osborne, Pros. Atty., Audrain County, Mexico, for respondent.
Before CRIST, P.J., and CRANDALL and CRANE, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant in an action for breach of an employment contract. We affirm.
The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carrón, 586 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).