Case Name: James C. HACKER, Appellant, v. John W. HACKER, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1995-10-20
Citations: 663 So. 2d 661
Docket Number: No. 95-764
Parties: James C. HACKER, Appellant, v. John W. HACKER, Appellee.
Judges: HARRIS, GRIFFIN and ANTOON, JJ„ concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 663
Pages: 661–662

Head Matter:
James C. HACKER, Appellant, v. John W. HACKER, Appellee.
No. 95-764.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Oct. 20, 1995.
Rehearing Denied Nov. 29, 1995.
James C. Hacker, Port Orange, pro se.
James L. Rose, of Rice & Rose, P.A., Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
It would serve no useful purpose to expend the space necessary to recount the unique procedural history of this case. We do conclude, however, after sorting it all out, that the trial court was correct in determining that it had not lost jurisdiction to act in the proceeding. Accordingly, the appealed order is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
HARRIS, GRIFFIN and ANTOON, JJ" concur.