Case Name: FRANCES S. DILATUSH ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, v. JACOB PROWN ET AL., DEFENDANTS
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1929-10-21
Citations: 7 N.J. Misc. 914
Docket Number: 
Parties: FRANCES S. DILATUSH ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, v. JACOB PROWN ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 7
Pages: 914–914

Head Matter:
FRANCES S. DILATUSH ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, v. JACOB PROWN ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
Submitted May term, 1929
Decided October 21, 1929.
Before Gummere, Chief Justice, and Justices Kalisch and Campbell.
Eor the rule, C. Gasewell Heine.
Contra, Harold McDermott and Theodore D. Parsons.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The only reason urged for setting aside the verdicts of the plaintiffs Anna H. Dilatush and E. Louise Dilatush is that they are excessive. We do not find them to be so. Both received painful injuries, some of which are permanent.
The rule is discharged.