Case Name: Robert Lee HOWARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2013-12-20
Citations: 128 So. 3d 929
Docket Number: No. 1D13-564
Parties: Robert Lee HOWARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: THOMAS, RAY, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 128
Pages: 929–929

Head Matter:
Robert Lee HOWARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D13-564.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Dec. 20, 2013.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Richelle M. Marsico, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant; Robert Lee Howard, pro se.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm Appellant's convictions and sentences. However, due to an apparent scrivener's error, the written sentence is ambiguous as to the intended sentence structure. Given the oral pronouncement of concurrent twenty-year terms for the two counts of which Appellant was convicted, the court's intent is clear from a review of the entire record. We, therefore, remand this case for correction of the written sentence to conform to the oral pronouncement. See Bryant v. State, 124 So.3d 256 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013). Appellant need not be present for the correction of this clerical error. Id.
AFFIRMED and REMANDED.
THOMAS, RAY, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.