Case Name: 14302 MARINA SAN PABLO PLACE SPE, LLC, Appellant, v. VCP-SAN PABLO, LTD., a Florida limited partnership, John D. Rood, individually, John D. Rood, as Trustee of the John D. Rood Revocable Trust U/A/D 1/26/88, as amended, Marina San Pablo Master Association, Inc., a Florida corporation, and Marina San Pablo Condominium Association, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2012-07-27
Citations: 92 So. 3d 320
Docket Number: No. 1D11-2927
Parties: 14302 MARINA SAN PABLO PLACE SPE, LLC, Appellant, v. VCP-SAN PABLO, LTD., a Florida limited partnership, John D. Rood, individually, John D. Rood, as Trustee of the John D. Rood Revocable Trust U/A/D 1/26/88, as amended, Marina San Pablo Master Association, Inc., a Florida corporation, and Marina San Pablo Condominium Association, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.
Judges: BENTON, C.J., ROWE, J., concur, and RAY, J., concurs with Opinion.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 92
Pages: 320–321

Head Matter:
14302 MARINA SAN PABLO PLACE SPE, LLC, Appellant, v. VCP-SAN PABLO, LTD., a Florida limited partnership, John D. Rood, individually, John D. Rood, as Trustee of the John D. Rood Revocable Trust U/A/D 1/26/88, as amended, Marina San Pablo Master Association, Inc., a Florida corporation, and Marina San Pablo Condominium Association, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.
No. 1D11-2927.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
July 27, 2012.
W. Glenn Jensen and Shane P. Martin of Roetzel & Andress, LPA, Orlando, for Appellant.
Frank A. Ruggieri and Patryk Ozim of Larsen & Associates, P.A., Orlando, for Appellees Marina San Pablo Master Association, Inc., and Marina San Pablo Condominium Association, Inc.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This appeal is from an order declaring that Appellant is liable to the Marina San Pablo Master Association for certain fees and assessments. The trial court entered this order in the context of a foreclosure case, upon a motion for clarification filed more than three months after entry of the final judgment. Because the period for rehearing or clarification had passed and the trial court was not ruling on a motion filed under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540, the court lacked jurisdiction to enter the order at issue. See Pruitt v. Brock, 437 So.2d 768, 773 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983) (quoting St. Cloud Utilities v. Moore, 410 So.2d 973, 974 n. 3 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982)). Accordingly, we QUASH the order on appeal, leaving the final judgment of foreclosure undisturbed.