Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Carlos Alberto TORRES-GONZALES, also known as Luis Antonio Valle-Licona, also known as Luis Antonio Valle, also known as Luis Antonio Balli, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-12-12
Citations: 257 F. App'x 816
Docket Number: No. 06-41421
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Carlos Alberto TORRES-GONZALES, also known as Luis Antonio Valle-Licona, also known as Luis Antonio Valle, also known as Luis Antonio Balli, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 257
Pages: 816–817

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Carlos Alberto TORRES-GONZALES, also known as Luis Antonio Valle-Licona, also known as Luis Antonio Valle, also known as Luis Antonio Balli, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-41421
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 12, 2007.
James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern Dis trict of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.
Rene C. Flores, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Corpus Christi, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Carlos Alberto Torres-Gonzales has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Torres-Gonzales has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel's brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.