Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Mark Twain JOHNSON, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-06-14
Citations: 164 S.W.3d 539
Docket Number: No. ED 84750
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Mark Twain JOHNSON, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J. and LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 164
Pages: 539–540

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Mark Twain JOHNSON, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 84750.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
June 14, 2005.
Jo Ann Rotermund, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Evan J. Buchheim, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J. and LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Mark Twain Johnson (Defendant) appeals from the trial court's judgment and sentence imposed after a jury found him guilty of one count of delivery of a controlled substance, in violation of Section 195.211 RSMo 2000. The trial court sentenced Defendant, as a prior and persistent drug offender, to ten years' imprisonment. This appeal follows.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would have no juris prudential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).