Case Name: JULES HABITAT, INCORPORATED, Appellant, v. Walter LEE, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-07-24
Citations: 564 So. 2d 263
Docket Number: No. 89-2970
Parties: JULES HABITAT, INCORPORATED, Appellant, v. Walter LEE, Appellee.
Judges: Before HUBBART, LEVY and GERSTEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 564
Pages: 263–264

Head Matter:
JULES HABITAT, INCORPORATED, Appellant, v. Walter LEE, Appellee.
No. 89-2970.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 24, 1990.
Ronald H. Peacock, Miami, for appellant.
Wilson E. Hodge, Miami, for appellee.
Before HUBBART, LEVY and GERSTEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Jules Habitat, Incorporated, appeals a final judgment in favor of appel-lee, Walter Lee, on appellee's action for breach of contract. We affirm.
We base our opinion on the well-settled principle that "[fjindings of fact made by a trial court sitting as fact-finder come to this court with a presumption of correctness and will not be disturbed so long as the findings are supported by competent and substantial evidence in the record." Malver v. Sheffield Industries, Inc., 502 So.2d 75, 77 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Oceanic International Corporation v. Lantana Boatyard, 402 So.2d 507 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).
We reject the second issue raised by appellant as wholly unsupported by the record. Thornber v. City of Fort Walton Beach, 534 So.2d 754 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).
Affirmed.