Case Name: Tarell ADAMS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-01-17
Citations: 360 S.W.3d 303
Docket Number: No. ED 96382
Parties: Tarell ADAMS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., KENNETH M. ROMINES, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 360
Pages: 303–304

Head Matter:
Tarell ADAMS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 96382.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Jan. 17, 2012.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Feb. 23, 2012.
Andrew E. Zleit, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Chris Foster, Attorney General, Mary H. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., KENNETH M. ROMINES, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Tarell Adams, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-convietion relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).