Case Name: Douglas R. VALENTINE, Appellant, v. Ruth Ann VALENTINE, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1972-04-07
Citations: 260 So. 2d 524
Docket Number: No. 71-533
Parties: Douglas R. VALENTINE, Appellant, v. Ruth Ann VALENTINE, Appellee.
Judges: PIERCE, C. J., and LILES and HOB-SON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 260
Pages: 524–524

Head Matter:
Douglas R. VALENTINE, Appellant, v. Ruth Ann VALENTINE, Appellee.
No. 71-533.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
April 7, 1972.
Rehearing Denied May 4, 1972.
W. Daniel Kearney, Bradenton, for appellant.
Warren M. Goodrich, of Goodrich, Hampton, Thompson & Boylston, Professional Association, Bradenton, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We have carefully considered the record on appeal and the briefs of the respective parties and find that the judgment appealed is supported by competent substantial evidence. The appellant having failed to show reversible error, the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
PIERCE, C. J., and LILES and HOB-SON, JJ., concur.