Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Deshone HOLMES, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-02-28
Citations: 712 F. App'x 595
Docket Number: No. 17-3552
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Deshone HOLMES, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 712
Pages: 595–596

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Deshone HOLMES, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 17-3552
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: February 23, 2018
Filed: February 28, 2018
Martin Joseph McLaughlin, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Patrick J. Reinert, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Iowa, Cedar Rapids, IA, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Michael Deshone Holmes, Pro Se
Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this direct criminal appeal, Michael Holmes challenges the order of the district court revoking his supervised release and imposing a 6-month sentence, followed by 6 months of supervised release. His counsel has moved to withdraw, and has submitted a brief arguing that the district court abused its discretion by revoking Holmes's supervised release, and that the sentence is substantively unreasonable.
Upon careful review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by revoking Holmes s supervised release. See United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 914 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review). We further conclude that Holmes's sentence was not unreasonable, as the district court properly considered the 18 U.S.C. § 3653(a) factors; there was no indication the court overlooked a relevant factor, or committed a clear error of judgment in weighing the relevant factors, see United States v. Johnson, 827 F.3d 740, 744 (8th Cir. 2016) (standard of review); and the sentence was within the Guidelines range, see United States v. Perkins, 526 F.3d 1107, 1110 (8th Cir. 2008). Accordingly, we grant counsel leave to withdraw, and affirm.
. The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa.