Case Name: Sharon THOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ORANGE COUNTY GOVERNMENT, Defendant-Appellee, and Orange County Department of Social Services; UNC Healthcare System, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-09-02
Citations: 583 F. App'x 45
Docket Number: No. 14-1353
Parties: Sharon THOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ORANGE COUNTY GOVERNMENT, Defendant-Appellee, and Orange County Department of Social Services; UNC Healthcare System, Defendants.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 583
Pages: 45–46

Head Matter:
Sharon THOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ORANGE COUNTY GOVERNMENT, Defendant-Appellee, and Orange County Department of Social Services; UNC Healthcare System, Defendants.
No. 14-1353.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 28, 2014.
Decided: Sept. 2, 2014.
Sharon Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Sonny Sade Haynes, James R. Morgan, Jr., Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, PLLC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Ap-pellee.
Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Sharon Thomas appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment to the defendants upon finding Thomas' claims barred by res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Thomas leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thomas v. Orange Cnty. Gov't, No. 1:10—cv-00078-CCE-LPA (M.D.N.C. Mar. 17, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.