Case Name: Hamid MAHJOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GREENPOINT MORTGAGE FUNDING, INC.; Brock & Scott, PLLC; Trustee Services of Virginia, LLC; Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.; FFC Properties, LLC, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-10-23
Citations: 699 F. App'x 231
Docket Number: No. 17-1782
Parties: Hamid MAHJOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GREENPOINT MORTGAGE FUNDING, INC.; Brock & Scott, PLLC; Trustee Services of Virginia, LLC; Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.; FFC Properties, LLC, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 699
Pages: 231–231

Head Matter:
Hamid MAHJOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GREENPOINT MORTGAGE FUNDING, INC.; Brock & Scott, PLLC; Trustee Services of Virginia, LLC; Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.; FFC Properties, LLC, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 17-1782
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: October 19, 2017
Decided: October 23, 2017
Hamid R. Mahjor, Appellant Pro Se. Syed Mohsin Reza, TROUTMAN SANDERS, LLP, Tysons Corner, Virginia; John E. Rinaldi, WALSH COLUCCI LUBE-LEY & WALSH, PC, Prince William, Virginia; Robert Anthony Oliveri, Jr., BROCK & SCOTT PLLC, Warrenton, Virginia; Stephen Christenson, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Hamid Mahjor appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil action asserting numerous claims arising out of a foreclosure sale of his home. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mahjor v, Greenpoint Mortg. Funding, Inc., No. 1:17-cv-00498-LMB-IDD, 2017 WL 2728033 (E.D. Va. June 23, 2017). We deny Mahjor's motions for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED