Case Name: Michael CRISEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-05-18
Citations: 561 So. 2d 453
Docket Number: No. 89-00016
Parties: Michael CRISEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SCHEB, A.C.J., and LEHAN, J„ concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 561
Pages: 453–457

Head Matter:
Michael CRISEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 89-00016.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
May 18, 1990.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Allyn Giambalvo, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Peggy A. Quince, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Following our recent decision in V.A.A. v. State, 561 So.2d 314 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990), we reverse the trial court's denial of appellant's motion to dismiss the charges of possession of cocaine and marijuana, and direct that these charges be dismissed. Because this reversal does not affect the disposition of appellant's convictions for sale of cocaine and marijuana, resentencing is unnecessary.
We certify as of great public importance the question which the specially concurring opinion suggests for certification.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
SCHEB, A.C.J., and LEHAN, J" concur.
PARKER, J., concurs specially.