Case Name: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ARTHUR C. HOPSON, JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1971-12-20
Citations: 60 N.J. 1
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ARTHUR C. HOPSON, JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 60
Pages: 1–7

Head Matter:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ARTHUR C. HOPSON, JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Argued November 23, 1971
Decided December 20, 1971.
Mr. Gerald T. Foley, Jr., Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Stanley 0. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney).
Mr. Richard F. Thayer, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Joseph P. Lordi, Essex County Prosecutor, attorney).

Opinion:
Pee Curiam.
The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed for the reasons given by Judge Halpern in his dissenting opinion. (114 N. J. Super. 146, 148 (1971))