Case Name: In the Matter of D. H., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. D. H., Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2010-07-07
Citations: 236 Or. App. 234
Docket Number: 090362787; A141874
Parties: In the Matter of D. H., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. D. H., Appellant.
Judges: Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Armstrong, Judge, and Carson, Senior Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 236
Pages: 234–235

Head Matter:
Submitted June 16,
reversed July 7, 2010
In the Matter of D. H., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. D. H., Appellant.
Multnomah County Circuit Court
090362787; A141874
234 P3d 1098
Rebecca Carter filed the brief for appellant.
John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Jerome Lidz, Solicitor General, and Laura S. Anderson, Senior Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Armstrong, Judge, and Carson, Senior Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Appellant in this mental commitment case appeals a judgment committing him to the Mental Health Division for treatment for a period of time not to exceed 90 days. ORS 426.130 (2007), amended by Or Laws 2009, ch 595, § 393. The trial court found that appellant suffers from a mental disorder and is unable to provide for his basic personal needs. The state concedes that the record lacks clear and convincing evidence that defendant's mental illness causes him to be unable to provide for his basic personal needs. On de novo review, we find the state's concession to be well-founded and accept it.
Reversed.