Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Derrick Hugh DEHANEY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-05-04
Citations: 8 F. App'x 237
Docket Number: No. 01-6093
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Derrick Hugh DEHANEY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 8
Pages: 237–238

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Derrick Hugh DEHANEY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 01-6093.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 27, 2001.
Decided May 4, 2001.
Derrick Hugh Dehaney, pro se.
Joseph William Hooge Mott, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, VA, for appellee.
Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Derrick Hugh Dehaney seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U..S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certifícate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Dehaney, Nos. CR-96-49; CA-99-343 (W.D.Va. Dec. 6, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Dehaney also raises on appeal an equal protection claim that he did not assert in the district court. This court will not address issues raised for the first time on appeal except in exceptional circumstances not present here. Grossman v. Commissioner, 182 F.3d 275, 280-81 (4th Cir.1999).