Case Name: Herman Gernau, Administrator, etc., Appellant, v. The Oceanic Steam Navigation Company, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1893-06
Citations: 77 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 598
Docket Number: 
Parties: Herman Gernau, Administrator, etc., Appellant, v. The Oceanic Steam Navigation Company, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Supreme Court Reports (Hun)
Volume: 77
Pages: 598–598

Head Matter:
Herman Gernau, Administrator, etc., Appellant, v. The Oceanic Steam Navigation Company, Respondent.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Per Curiam:
There seems to have been no substantial change in the evidence which was presented to the court upon the prior appeal, and that which is contained in the present record, except perhaps to strengthen the case upon tne part of the defendants. It was then held that there was no evidence of negligence upon the part of the defendants sufficient to go to the jury, and, therefore, it seems unnecessary to rediscuss the same. Some exceptions are called to our attention by the counsel for the appellant, which might have needed notice had the case gone to the jury; but they do not seem in any way to have been injurious, in view of the fact that the plaintiff's complaint was dismissed. The judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.