Case Name: Jules E. PICCARD, on behalf of himself and for the benefit of and on behalf of the defendant, The Sperry Corporation, and all other stockholders of said defendant, The Sperry Corporation, who may be similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SPERRY CORPORATION et al., Defendants-Appellees, Consolidated Investing Corporation, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1941-06-05
Citations: 120 F.2d 328
Docket Number: No. 318
Parties: Jules E. PICCARD, on behalf of himself and for the benefit of and on behalf of the defendant, The Sperry Corporation, and all other stockholders of said defendant, The Sperry Corporation, who may be similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SPERRY CORPORATION et al., Defendants-Appellees, Consolidated Investing Corporation, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 120
Pages: 328–328

Head Matter:
Jules E. PICCARD, on behalf of himself and for the benefit of and on behalf of the defendant, The Sperry Corporation, and all other stockholders of said defendant, The Sperry Corporation, who may be similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SPERRY CORPORATION et al., Defendants-Appellees, Consolidated Investing Corporation, Appellant.
No. 318.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
June 5, 1941.
Weinstein & Levinson, of New York City (Frank Weinstein and Samuel J. Levinson, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellant Consolidated Investing Corporation.
A. Joseph Geist, of New York City (George E. Netter, of New York City, of counsel), for appellee Jules E. Piccard.
Chadbourné, Wallace, Parke & White-side, of New York City, for defendants Sperry Corporation and others.
Sullivan & Cromwell, of New York City, for defendant J. Russell Forgan and others.
Before L. HAND, CHASE, and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Order, 36 F.Supp. 1006, affirmed in open court.