Case Name: Donald McDuffin WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Detective J. MOUTON; Officer Tubman; Anton Johnson, P.G. County Police, Brentwood, Defendants-Appellees, and Lord Baltimore Hotel, Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-02-21
Citations: 712 F. App'x 283
Docket Number: No. 17-7198
Parties: Donald McDuffin WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Detective J. MOUTON; Officer Tubman; Anton Johnson, P.G. County Police, Brentwood, Defendants-Appellees, and Lord Baltimore Hotel, Defendant.
Judges: Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and KING, Circuit Judge, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 712
Pages: 283–283

Head Matter:
Donald McDuffin WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Detective J. MOUTON; Officer Tubman; Anton Johnson, P.G. County Police, Brentwood, Defendants-Appellees, and Lord Baltimore Hotel, Defendant.
No. 17-7198
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: February 6, 2018
Decided: February 21, 2018
Donald McDuffin Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Melissa Goldmeier, Gary W. Kuc, Louis Paul Ruzzi, HOWARD COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Ellicott City, Maryland; Bernard Allen Cook, LAW OFFICES OF BERNARD A. COOK, LLC, Columbia, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and KING, Circuit Judge, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Donald McDuffin Williams seeks to appeal the district court's orders staying his civil case pending resolution of his criminal case and returning documents. Appellees have moved to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The orders that Williams seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appeal-able interlocutory or collateral orders. See Moses H. Cone Mem'l Hosp. v. Mercury Constr. Corp., 460 U.S. 1, 10 n.11, 103 S.Ct. 927, 74 L.Ed.2d 765 (1983); Porter v. Zook, 803 F.3d 694, 696 (4th Cir. 2015); Amdur v. Lizars, 372 F.2d 103, 105-06 (4th Cir. 1967). Accordingly, we grant Appel-lees' motion to dismiss, deny Williams' pending motions, and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED