Case Name: Doris BUSSINEAU, Appellant, v. GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY, et al., Appellees
Court: District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Decision Date: 1987-08-11
Citations: 532 A.2d 89
Docket Number: No. 84-1318
Parties: Doris BUSSINEAU, Appellant, v. GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY, et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before PRYOR, Chief Judge, and NEBEKER, , MACK, NEWMAN, FERREN, BELSON, TERRY, ROGERS and STEADMAN, Associate Judges.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 532
Pages: 89–89

Head Matter:
Doris BUSSINEAU, Appellant, v. GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY, et al., Appellees.
No. 84-1318.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Aug. 11, 1987.
Before PRYOR, Chief Judge, and NEBEKER, , MACK, NEWMAN, FERREN, BELSON, TERRY, ROGERS and STEADMAN, Associate Judges.
EDITOR’S NOTE: Associate Judges Nebeker, Newman and Ferren constituted the Division that originally considered the case. As noted in the penultimate paragraph of this Order, this Division has denied the motion to stay the mandate.
Chief Judge Pryor, and Associate Judges Belson and Steadman are recused from consideration of this case.
Associate Judge Nebeker did not vote on the motion for reconsideration as he regards the motion as one directed to the recused judges.
Associate Judge Mack would grant the petition for rehearing en banc, but deny the motion for reconsideration of the denial of the petition.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
On consideration of the motion of appel-lee to stay the mandate and for reconsideration of the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc, 525 A.2d 595, the response of appellant thereto, the request of appellee for leave to reply to the response to the motion, the lodged reply, and the opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion for leave to reply is granted and the Clerk is directed to file the lodged reply. It is
FURTHER ORDERED on behalf of the division assigned to this case that the motion to stay the mandate is denied. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration of the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc is denied.