Case Name: CARMELA LENA, ADMINISTRATIX OF THE ESTATE OF FAUST LENA AND ADMINISTRATIX AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF FAUST LENA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CLARENCE ENSLEY, ANTHONY DiPIETRO, NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY, GIORDANO AND MOLAR TRUCKING CO., INC., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1972-12-18
Citations: 62 N.J. 19
Docket Number: 
Parties: CARMELA LENA, ADMINISTRATIX OF THE ESTATE OF FAUST LENA AND ADMINISTRATIX AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF FAUST LENA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CLARENCE ENSLEY, ANTHONY DiPIETRO, NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY, GIORDANO AND MOLAR TRUCKING CO., INC., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 62
Pages: 19–19

Head Matter:
CARMELA LENA, ADMINISTRATIX OF THE ESTATE OF FAUST LENA AND ADMINISTRATIX AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF FAUST LENA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CLARENCE ENSLEY, ANTHONY DiPIETRO, NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY, GIORDANO AND MOLAR TRUCKING CO., INC., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Argued December 5, 1972
Decided December 18, 1972.
Mr. Gerald S. Gordon argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Pincus, Sheehan & Hendriclcs, attorneys).
Mr. Henry H. Rubenson argued the cause for respondents.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This matter comes to us as of right because of dissent in the Appellate Division. The judgment of the-Appellate Division is affirmed substantially for reasons expressed in the majority opinion.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Wbintraub, Justices Jacobs, Hall and Mountain, and Judges Coneord, Sullivan and Lewis — 7.
For reversal — None.