Case Name: Clara Galus, Individually and as Executrix of Philip Galus, Deceased, Appellant, v. William Milner, Respondent, et al., Defendant
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1981-10-29
Citations: 54 N.Y.2d 1019
Docket Number: 
Parties: Clara Galus, Individually and as Executrix of Philip Galus, Deceased, Appellant, v William Milner, Respondent, et al., Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 54
Pages: 1019–1021

Head Matter:
Clara Galus, Individually and as Executrix of Philip Galus, Deceased, Appellant, v William Milner, Respondent, et al., Defendant.
Decided October 29, 1981
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Daniel H. Mahoney for appellant.
James M. Conboy for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On summary consideration, order affirmed, with costs. We cannot say that the order reinstating the jury's verdict was an abuse of discretion as a matter of law (Holland v Blake, 31 NY2d 734).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.