Case Name: Bonnie S. SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LAIDLAW TRANSIT SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-08-28
Citations: 196 F. App'x 153
Docket Number: No. 06-1124
Parties: Bonnie S. SMITH, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. LAIDLAW TRANSIT SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 196
Pages: 153–154

Head Matter:
Bonnie S. SMITH, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. LAIDLAW TRANSIT SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 06-1124.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 24, 2006.
Decided: Aug. 28, 2006.
Bonnie S. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Franklin Grady Shuler, Jr., Turner & Pad gett, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Bonnie S. Smith appeals the district court's order substantially accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to Defendant on Smith's federal claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000), and on Smith's state law claims for negligence and harassment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Laidlaw Transit Servs., No. 3:02-cv-04179-JFA (D.S.C. Jan. 6, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
The district court dismissed without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c) (2000) Smith's claim under the South Carolina Bill of Rights for Handicapped Persons.