Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Angel PEREZ-FIERRO, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-11-26
Citations: 256 F. App'x 97
Docket Number: No. 07-50109
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jose Angel PEREZ-FIERRO, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: TROTT, W. FLETCHER and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 256
Pages: 97–98

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jose Angel PEREZ-FIERRO, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 07-50109.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 13, 2007.
Filed Nov. 26, 2007.
Eugene S. Litvinoff, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
John R. Fielding, Jr., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: TROTT, W. FLETCHER and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Jose Angel Perez-Fierro appeals from his jury-trial conviction for attempted reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Perez-Fierro contends that his conviction was obtained in violation of the prohibition against double jeopardy. We disagree. The record reflects that the district court properly granted defendant's motion for a mistrial after the jury deadlocked. Furthermore, Perez-Fierro has not shown that the prosecutor intentionally provoked him into moving for a mistrial. See Oregon v. Kennedy, 456 U.S. 667, 679, 102 S.Ct. 2083, 72 L.Ed.2d 416 (1982).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.