Case Name: Sukhjinder SINGH, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-05-20
Citations: 98 F. App'x 669
Docket Number: No. 03-70911
Parties: Sukhjinder SINGH, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 98
Pages: 669–670

Head Matter:
Sukhjinder SINGH, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 03-70911.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 10, 2004.
Decided May 20, 2004.
Richard E. Oriakhi, Roman & Singh, LLP, Fremont, CA, Olumide K Obayemi, Esq., Oakland, CA, for Petitioner.
Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Terri J. Seadron, Esq., Hillel Smith, Efthimia S. Pilitsis, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Sukhjinder Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' summary affirmance of the Immigration Judge's denial of his applications for adjustment of status, waiver of inadmissibility, and voluntary departure. Under section 309(c)(4)(C) of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act, "the petition for judicial review must be filed not later than 30 days after the date of the final order of exclusion or deportation." See Narayan v. INS, 105 F.3d 1335, 1335 (9th Cir.1997) (order). This statute of limitations is a jurisdictional bar. See Singh v. INS, 315 F.3d 1186, 1188 (9th Cir.2003). Because Singh brought his petition for review after the 30-day period expired, we lack jurisdiction to hear his petition. See id.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.