Case Name: In the Matter of the Marriage of ELDRIDGE, Petitioner-Respondent, and ELDRIDGE, Respondent-Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1988-04-13
Citations: 90 Or. App. 438
Docket Number: 86-0388-NJ-2; CA A44885
Parties: In the Matter of the Marriage of ELDRIDGE, Petitioner-Respondent, and ELDRIDGE, Respondent-Appellant.
Judges: Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Warren and Rossman, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 90
Pages: 438–439

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted March 18,
affirmed as modified April 13, 1988
In the Matter of the Marriage of ELDRIDGE, Petitioner-Respondent, and ELDRIDGE, Respondent-Appellant.
(86-0388-NJ-2; CA A44885)
752 P2d 355
Michael McGrady, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent-appellant. On the brief was Charles O. Porter, Eugene.
Patricia Crain, Medford, argued the cause for petitioner-respondent. With her on the brief was Black, Hanson, Crain, Austin & Webber, Medford.
Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Warren and Rossman, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
On the basis of wife's concession at oral argument that she was not entitled to an award of attorney fees, we modify the dissolution judgment in that particular. The judgment is otherwise affirmed.
Award of attorney fees vacated; affirmed as modified. Costs to neither party.