Case Name: Henry W. MARTIN, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Earnestine M. PEPPER, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-09-11
Citations: 239 F. App'x 786
Docket Number: No. 07-7051
Parties: Henry W. MARTIN, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Earnestine M. PEPPER, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 239
Pages: 786–787

Head Matter:
Henry W. MARTIN, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Earnestine M. PEPPER, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 07-7051.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 30, 2007.
Decided: Sept. 11, 2007.
Henry W. Martin, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Henry W. Martin, Jr., appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Martin v. Pepper, No. 6:07-cv-01116-HMH, 2007 WL 1840628 (D.S.C. June 25, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.