Case Name: In the Matter of the Claim of Mary Fragale, Respondent, v. Armory Maintenance et al., Appellants. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1966-09-29
Citations: 18 N.Y.2d 729
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Claim of Mary Fragale, Respondent, v. Armory Maintenance et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.
Judges: Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Bubke, Bebgan and Keating. Judges Van Voobhis and Scileppi dissent and vote to reverse and to dismiss the claim upon the dissenting opinion at the Appellate Division.
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 18
Pages: 729–730

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Claim of Mary Fragale, Respondent, v. Armory Maintenance et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.
Argued September 20, 1966;
decided September 29, 1966.
Bernard F. Farley and Joseph M. Soviero for appellants.
Louis J. Lefkowits, Attorney-General (David Belson, Ruth Kessler Toch and Daniel Polcmsky of counsel), for Workmen’s Compensation Board, respondent.
Matthew J. Sherlock, Jr., for claimant-respondent.

Opinion:
Order affirmed on the opinion at the Appellate Division, with costs. (See, also, Matter of Connelly v. Samaritan Hosp., 259 N. Y. 137; Matter of Stern v. Electrol, Inc., 4 A D 2d 110, mot. for lv. to app. den. 3 N Y 2d 707.) No opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Bubke, Bebgan and Keating. Judges Van Voobhis and Scileppi dissent and vote to reverse and to dismiss the claim upon the dissenting opinion at the Appellate Division.