Case Name: John C. Crawford v. John C. French
Court: Supreme Court of Texas
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1860-10
Citations: 25 Supp. Tex. 436
Docket Number: 
Parties: John C. Crawford v. John C. French.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Reports
Volume: 25 Supp.
Pages: 436–437

Head Matter:
John C. Crawford v. John C. French.
Where there were three suits between the same parties, it was proper to consolidate them.
Where the verdict was well sustained by the evidence, and there was no error in the charge, although there may have been conflict in the statements of witnesses, this court will not reverse the judgment because of a refusal to grant a new trial.
Appeal from Bexar. The case was. tried before Hon. Thomas J. Devine, one of the district judges.
This was purely a fact case; and, there being no question of law discussed in the opinion, a further report is unnecessary than to say, that the facts clearly sustained the charge of the court and the verdict of the jury.
J. A. R. Green and N. 0. Green, for appellant.
Denison Henson and Warrick Tunstall, for appellee.

Opinion:
Bell, J.
—We are of opinion that there is no error in the judgment. The three suits were properly consolidated. The charge of the court is not complained of, nor do we perceive that it was liable to any objection. The case depended entirely upon the facts; and the most that can be said in behalf of the appellant is, that there was some conflict in the testimony. We think, however, that the verdict is well sustained by the evidence. We will waive any extended notice of the evidence, as it would be unprofitable to recite the facts in this opinion, there being no questions of law to discuss.
The judgment of the court below is
Affirmed.