Case Name: Barry DISNEY, individually, B. Disney International, Inc., a Florida corporation, and Micro Computer Consultants, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellants, v. DISCOUNT DRUGS, INC., Barad Holding Corporation, and Arnold Barad, individually, jointly and severally, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1988-05-25
Citations: 524 So. 2d 1173
Docket Number: No. 87-1781
Parties: Barry DISNEY, individually, B. Disney International, Inc., a Florida corporation, and Micro Computer Consultants, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellants, v. DISCOUNT DRUGS, INC., Barad Holding Corporation, and Arnold Barad, individually, jointly and severally, Appellees.
Judges: HERSEY, C.J., DOWNEY and STONE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 524
Pages: 1173–1173

Head Matter:
Barry DISNEY, individually, B. Disney International, Inc., a Florida corporation, and Micro Computer Consultants, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellants, v. DISCOUNT DRUGS, INC., Barad Holding Corporation, and Arnold Barad, individually, jointly and severally, Appellees.
No. 87-1781.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
May 25, 1988.
Marvin Quittner, Plantation, for appellants.
Peter S. Roumbos and Elliot S. Shaw of Taplin & Howard, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
After review of the record on appeal we conclude that the trial court did not err in finding, pursuant to section 78.067(2), Florida Statutes (1987), that it is reasonably probable that appellee is entitled to possession of the disputed IBM equipment. Accordingly, we affirm.
AFFIRMED.
HERSEY, C.J., DOWNEY and STONE, JJ., concur.