Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis Gerardo RANGEL-RANGEL, also known as Jose Alfredo Garcia-Hernandez, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-09-08
Citations: 197 F. App'x 373
Docket Number: No. 05-41120
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis Gerardo RANGEL-RANGEL, also known as Jose Alfredo Garcia-Hernandez, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING, GARWOOD, and JOLLY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 197
Pages: 373–374

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis Gerardo RANGEL-RANGEL, also known as Jose Alfredo Garcia-Hernandez, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 05-41120
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Sept. 8, 2006.
James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern Dis trict of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.
Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Laura Fletcher Leavitt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before KING, GARWOOD, and JOLLY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Luis Gerardo Rangel-Rangel raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.