Case Name: DOROTHY L. BERRY, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. SILENT AUTOMATIC SALES COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1933-09-27
Citations: 111 N.J.L. 382
Docket Number: 
Parties: DOROTHY L. BERRY, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. SILENT AUTOMATIC SALES COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 111
Pages: 382–385

Head Matter:
DOROTHY L. BERRY, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. SILENT AUTOMATIC SALES COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Submitted May 26, 1933
Decided September 27, 1933.
For the respondent-appellant, John A. Matthews.
For the petitioner-respondent, DeBaun & Westervelt (Jesse B. Leslie, of counsel).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Case, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Van Buskiitk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.