Case Name: Samuel S. SMITH, and Smith & Mandler, P.A., Appellants/cross-appellees, v. Edith Horowitz BROIDA, Appellee/cross-appellant
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-12-12
Citations: 555 So. 2d 405
Docket Number: No. 89-1306
Parties: Samuel S. SMITH, and Smith & Mandler, P.A., Appellants/cross-appellees, v. Edith Horowitz BROIDA, Appellee/cross-appellant.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and COPE, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 555
Pages: 405–405

Head Matter:
Samuel S. SMITH, and Smith & Mandler, P.A., Appellants/cross-appellees, v. Edith Horowitz BROIDA, Appellee/cross-appellant.
No. 89-1306.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 12, 1989.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 8, 1990.
Stephens, Lynn, Klein & McNicholas and Robert M. Klein, Miami, for appellants/ cross-appellees.
Edith Horowitz Broida, in pro. per.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and COPE, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Upon review of the file herein, we conclude that the action filed by appellee was frivolous. See Whitten v. Progressive Casualty Ins. Co., 410 So.2d 501, 505-06 (Fla.1982). We therefore reverse the order denying attorney's fees under section 57.105, Florida Statutes (1987), and remand for determination of the amount. As to the cross-appeal, we affirm the order awarding costs to appellants/cross-appellees.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.