Case Name: Edward Y. POLITI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-02-26
Citations: 89 F. App'x 112
Docket Number: No. 03-55768; D.C. No. CV-02-03387-LGB
Parties: Edward Y. POLITI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before FERNANDEZ, W. FLETCHER, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 89
Pages: 112–113

Head Matter:
Edward Y. POLITI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 03-55768.
D.C. No. CV-02-03387-LGB.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 17, 2004.
Decided Feb. 26, 2004.
Edward Y. Politi, pro se, Northridge, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Adrienne M. Byers, Office of the County Counsel, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before FERNANDEZ, W. FLETCHER, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Edward Politi appeals pro se the district court's judgment dismissing, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that the County of Los Angeles violated his constitutional rights. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Bianchi v. Rylaarsdam, 334 F.3d 895, 898 (9th Cir.2003). We affirm.
The district court's dismissal was proper.
Politi's remaining contentions lack merit.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.