Case Name: Cain v. Hedden et al.
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1919-02-13
Citations: 148 Ga. 773
Docket Number: No. 1045
Parties: Cain v. Hedden et al.
Judges: Alt the Justices concur.
Reporter: Georgia Reports
Volume: 148
Pages: 773–773

Head Matter:
Cain v. Hedden et al.
No. 1045.
February 13, 1919.
Equitable petition. Before Judge Bell. Fulton superior court. May 25,1918.
James & Bedgood, for plaintiff.
B. B. Jackson and George F. Gober, for defendants.

Opinion:
Hill, J.
This was a suit based on fraud, for rescission of a contract whereby the plaintiff and one of the defendants had made an exchange of property. The allegations of the petition on the subject of fraud and tender were substantially the same as alleged in the petition, as amended, filed by the same plaintiff against several of the same defendants, in the suit of Cain v. Ragsdale, 146 Ga. 372 (91 S. E. 119). The petition in that case was held to be subject to general demurrer; and the ruling there made is applicable to the petition in the present case. It follows that the judge did not err in dismissing the petition on general demurrer. Judgment affirmed.
Alt the Justices concur.