Case Name: Rhett Gavin STUART, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SPRINGS INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2014-05-21
Citations: 572 F. App'x 191
Docket Number: No. 13-1984
Parties: Rhett Gavin STUART, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SPRINGS INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 572
Pages: 191–192

Head Matter:
Rhett Gavin STUART, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SPRINGS INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 13-1984.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 29, 2014.
Decided: May 21, 2014.
David B. Marvel, Prenner Marvel, PA, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellant. Ronald B. Diegel, Peter E. Farr, Ashley B. Stratton, Murphy Grantland, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Rhett Gavin Stuart appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Springs Industries, Inc., in his action alleging that Springs negligently failed to warn of a dangerous condition, resulting in his injuries. We have reviewed the record and briefs filed by the parties, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stuart v. Springs, Indus., 957 F.Supp.2d 644 (D.S.C.2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.