Case Name: RASMUSSEN v. HOME INDUSTRY IRON WORKS
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1912-11-27
Citations: 199 F. 990
Docket Number: No. 2,425
Parties: RASMUSSEN v. HOME INDUSTRY IRON WORKS.
Judges: Before PARDEE, and SHELBY, Circuit Judges, and MEEK, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter
Volume: 199
Pages: 990–990

Head Matter:
RASMUSSEN v. HOME INDUSTRY IRON WORKS.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
November 27, 1912.)
No. 2,425.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Alabama; Harry T. Toulmin, Judge.
H. Pillans and Palmer Pillans, both of Mobile, Ala., for appellant.
D. P. Bestor, Jr., of Mobile, Ala., for appellees.
Before PARDEE, and SHELBY, Circuit Judges, and MEEK, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
On the facts we concur in the finding and decree of the District Court. 197 Fed. 661. To enforce the contract as claimed by appellant, without proof of actual damages, would be inequitable, permitting the appellant to enrich himself at the expense of the appellee. Decree affirmed.