Case Name: Tijon COX, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Social Security Administration, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-11-24
Citations: 401 F. App'x 801
Docket Number: No. 10-1677
Parties: Tijon COX, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Social Security Administration, DefendantAppellee.
Judges: Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 401
Pages: 801–801

Head Matter:
Tijon COX, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Social Security Administration, DefendantAppellee.
No. 10-1677.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 18, 2010.
Decided: Nov. 24, 2010.
TiJon Cox, Appellant Pro Se. Alex Gordon, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
TiJon Cox appeals the district court's order denying relief on his complaint alleging violations of his rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cox v. Astrue, No. 1:10-cv-00581-CCB, 2010 WL 2302336 (D. Md. June 7, 2010). We further deny Cox's motions for default judgment and for summary disposition. We deny Cox's motions to expedite as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.