Case Name: KRUEGEL v. WILLIAMS et al.
Court: Texas Courts of Civil Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1916-04-19
Citations: 185 S.W. 1072
Docket Number: No. 970
Parties: KRUEGEL v. WILLIAMS et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 185
Pages: 1072–1072

Head Matter:
KRUEGEL v. WILLIAMS et al.
(No. 970.)
(Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Amarillo.
April 19, 1916.
Rehearing Denied May 10, 1916.)
Appeal from District Court, Dallas County; J. C. Roberts, Judge.
Action by Herman Kruegel against W. H. Williams and another. Prom a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.
Affirmed.
Herman Kruegel, of Dallas, pro se. J. M. Avery, of Dallas, for appellees.

Opinion:
HALL, J.
Appellant sued H. H. Williams, as district clerk of Dallas county, together with the sureties on his official bond, for actual and exemplary damages, because of the refusal of Williams to issue an execution upon a judgment rendered in favor of appellant against Murphy & Bolanz, March 7, 1894. A review of the record shows that the same issues, based upon the same facts, have heretofore been decided adversely to appellant in the cases cited below, where full statements of all the matters presented in this appeal are set out. Por the reasons announced in the eases cited, the judgment herein is affirmed. Kruegel v. Bolanz, 103 S. W. 435; Kruegel v. Jones, 121 S. W. 218; Kruegel v. Rawlins, 121 S. W. 216; Kruegel v. Murphy & Bolanz, 59 Tex. Civ. App. 482, 126 S. W. 680; Kruegel v. Jones, 136 S. W. 835; Kruegel v. Jones, 143 S. W. 989; Kruegel v. Rawlins, 148 S. W. 343; Kruegel v. Murphy & Bolanz, 157 S. W. 1182; Kruegel v. Williams, 153 S. W. 903; Kruegel v. Murphy, 168 S. W. 983.