Case Name: Roger A. JOHNSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEXT DAY BLINDS CORPORATION; Great Windows Services, LLC, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-12-19
Citations: 548 F. App'x 82
Docket Number: No. 13-1373
Parties: Roger A. JOHNSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEXT DAY BLINDS CORPORATION; Great Windows Services, LLC, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 548
Pages: 82–83

Head Matter:
Roger A. JOHNSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEXT DAY BLINDS CORPORATION; Great Windows Services, LLC, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 13-1373.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 25, 2013.
Decided: Dec. 19, 2013.
Boniface K. Cobbina, Law Offices of Boniface K. Cobbina, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Meredith S. Campbell, Stacey L. Schwaber, Shulman, Rogers, Gan-dal, Pordy & Ecker, P.A., Potomac, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Roger A. Johnson, Jr., appeals the district court's orders dismissing his employment discrimination action and denying his motion to alter or amend the judgment We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Next Day Blinds Corp., No. 1:09-cv-02069-WMN, 2012 WL 2871418 (D.Md. Nov. 1, 2012; Feb 21, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.