Case Name: Larry CORDELL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2015-06-09
Citations: 463 S.W.3d 467
Docket Number: No. ED 101886
Parties: Larry CORDELL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 463
Pages: 467–468

Head Matter:
Larry CORDELL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 101886
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Filed: June 9, 2015
Edward S. Thompson, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Movant/Appellant.
Evan J. Buchheim, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent/Respondent.
Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Larry Cordell appeals from the motion court's Judgment denying, without an evi-dentiary hearing, his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 24.035. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. Mo. R. Crim. P. 2013.