Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Francisco Santibanez RIVERA, also known as Francisco Hernandez Santivanez, also known as Francisco Santibanez-Rivera, also known as Francisco Rivera Santibanez, also known as Francisco Hernandez Santibanez, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-02-19
Citations: 513 F. App'x 395
Docket Number: No. 12-20076
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Francisco Santibanez RIVERA, also known as Francisco Hernandez Santivanez, also known as Francisco Santibanez-Rivera, also known as Francisco Rivera Santibanez, also known as Francisco Hernandez Santibanez, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING, CLEMENT, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 513
Pages: 395–396

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Francisco Santibanez RIVERA, also known as Francisco Hernandez Santivanez, also known as Francisco Santibanez-Rivera, also known as Francisco Rivera Santibanez, also known as Francisco Hernandez Santibanez, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-20076
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Feb. 19, 2013.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Lourdes Rodriguez, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before KING, CLEMENT, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Francisco Santibanez Rivera (Santibanez) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Santi-banez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cm. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.