Case Name: Sundari K. PRASAD, f/k/a Aurealia N. Nelson, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DELTA SIGMA THETA SORORITY, INC., ETA Tau Chapter, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-02-27
Citations: 712 F. App'x 336
Docket Number: No. 17-7376
Parties: Sundari K. PRASAD, f/k/a Aurealia N. Nelson, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DELTA SIGMA THETA SORORITY, INC., ETA Tau Chapter, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 712
Pages: 336–337

Head Matter:
Sundari K. PRASAD, f/k/a Aurealia N. Nelson, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DELTA SIGMA THETA SORORITY, INC., ETA Tau Chapter, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 17-7376
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: February 22, 2018
Decided: February 27, 2018
Sundari K. Prasad, Appellant Pro Se.
Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Sundari K. Prasad appeals the district court's order dismissing as frivolous Pra-sad's civil rights action against Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc., because the claims raised therein were barred by the applicable statutes of limitations. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Prasad does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition in her informal brief. Thus, Prasad has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
The district court dismissed this action after conducting frivolity review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2012).