Case Name: Ex parte TINKOFF
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1918-06-11
Citations: 254 F. 225
Docket Number: Nos. 2621-2624
Parties: Ex parte TINKOFF.
Judges: Before BAKER, ADSCHUDER, and EVANS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter
Volume: 254
Pages: 225–225

Head Matter:
Ex parte TINKOFF.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
June 11, 1918.)
Nos. 2621-2624.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Illinois; Kenesaw M. Dandis, Judge.
From orders (254 Fed. 222) denying wilts of habeas corpus to Paysoff Tinkoff, Steve Zozaski, Hugo Carlson, and Victor Zukowski, petitioners separately appeal.
Affirmed.
Pay soil: Tinkoff and Stedman & Soelke, all of Chicago, Ill. (Swan M. Johnson, of Chicago, 111., of counsel), for appellant Tinkoff.
Stedman Soelke, of Chicago, Ill. (Swan M. Johnson, of Chicago, Ill. of counsel), for appellants Zozaski, Carlson, and Zukowski.
Charles F. Clyne, U. S. Atty., Robert T. Neill, Sp. Asst. U. S. Atty., and Dieut. Col. Naihan William MaeChesney, Judge Advocate, U. S. Army, all of Chicago, Ill. (Dieut. Col. Nathan William MaeChesney and Deslíe M. O’Connor, Department Judge Advocate’s Office, Central Department, U. S. Army, both of Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for appellees.
Before BAKER, ADSCHUDER, and EVANS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The orders heretofore entered by the District Court in these cases, refusing to issue writs of habeas corpus for discharge from military service of the United States under Selective Service Daw May 18, 1917, c. 15, 40 Stat. 76, will be affirmed^ as the petitions do not set forth facts justifying their issuance.