Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Anthony K. GAITHER, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2005-11-29
Citations: 179 S.W.3d 314
Docket Number: No. ED 85526
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Anthony K. GAITHER, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before NANNETTE A. BAKER, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 179
Pages: 314–314

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Anthony K. GAITHER, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 85526.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Nov. 29, 2005.
Maleaner Ryna Harvey, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Deborah Daniels, Karen Louis Kramer — co-counsel, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before NANNETTE A. BAKER, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Anthony K. Gaither appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered after a jury verdict finding him guilty of possession of a -controlled substance, in violation of Section 195.202 RSMo 2000. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not err, plainly or otherwise. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the .judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 30.25(b).