Case Name: STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. RICHARD HUTSON, Defendant
Court: Montana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Montana
Decision Date: 2010-08-05
Citations: 359 Mont. 60
Docket Number: CAUSE NO. DC-07-295B
Parties: STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. RICHARD HUTSON, Defendant.
Judges: Chairperson, Hon. Blair Jones, Member, Hon. Richard Simonton and Member, Hon. Ray Dayton.
Reporter: Montana Reports
Volume: 359
Pages: 60–61

Head Matter:
The District Court of the 18th Judicial District. County of Gallatin.
STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. RICHARD HUTSON, Defendant.
CAUSE NO. DC-07-295B DECISION

Opinion:
On January 25, 2010, the defendant was sentenced for violation of the conditions of a suspended sentence to a commitment to the Department of Corrections for a period of five (5) years for the offense of Count I: Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol, Fourth or Subsequent Offense, a felony.
On August 5,2010, the defendant's application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
The defendant was present and was represented by Connor Murphy. The state was not represented.
Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.
Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that "the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive." (§46-18-904(3), MCA).
The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.
Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.
It is the recommendation of the Sentence Review Division to the Department of Corrections that the defendant receive both mental health and chemical dependency treatment at the earliest time possible.
Done in open Court this 5th day of August, 2010.
DATED this 13th day of August, 2010.
Chairperson, Hon. Blair Jones, Member, Hon. Richard Simonton and Member, Hon. Ray Dayton.