Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Elton STOTTS, a/k/a Sugarbear, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-03-05
Citations: 30 F. App'x 189
Docket Number: No. 01-7771
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Elton STOTTS, a/k/a Sugarbear, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 30
Pages: 189–190

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Elton STOTTS, a/k/a Sugarbear, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 01-7771.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 21, 2002.
Decided March 5, 2002.
Robert Elton Stotts, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Michael Comstock, Office of the United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Robert Elton Stotts appeals the district court's orders denying his motion filed under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582 (West 2000), and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Stotts, No. CR-95-49 (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 5, 2001 & entered Sept. 6, 2001; filed Sept. 26, 2001 & entered Sept. 27, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.