Case Name: ROGERS et al. v. BOMER et al.
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oklahoma
Decision Date: 1920-03-09
Citations: 77 Okla. 285
Docket Number: No. 9653
Parties: ROGERS et al. v. BOMER et al.
Judges: OWEN, C. J., and PITCHFORD, JOHNSON, HIGGINS, and BAILEY, J.J., concur
Reporter: Oklahoma Reports
Volume: 77
Pages: 285–285

Head Matter:
ROGERS et al. v. BOMER et al.
No. 9653
Opinion Filed March 9, 1920.
(Syllabus by the Court.)
Appeal and Error — Failure to File Brief— Dismissal.
AVhere plaintiff in error files no brief, as required by rule 7 (47 Okla. vi) of this court, the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution.
Error from District Court, Nowata County; Conn Linn, Assigned Judge. ‘
Action between Jos. R. Rogers and others and John O. Bomer and others. From the judgment, the former brings error.
Dismissed.
Denton & Lee and Tillotson & Elliott, for plaintiffs in error.
Chase & Camnbell, for defendants in error.

Opinion:
RAINEY, J.
On January 13, 1920, an order was entered, giving plaintiff in error 30 days from that date in which to file brief, and the cause was thereafter submitted on February 10, 1920. No brief having been filed within the extension of time granted, the cause is dismissed for want of prosecution. Balch v. Pickard. 72 Oklahoma, 179 Pac. 10; McGowen et al. v. Keller Ring, 77 Oklahoma.
OWEN, C. J., and PITCHFORD, JOHNSON, HIGGINS, and BAILEY, J.J., concur