Case Name: Sandra RUBIN, f/k/a Sandra Cohen, Appellant, v. NEW SUNRISE INVESTMENT CORP., Herman Cohen, and Charlotte Vogel, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1992-03-03
Citations: 596 So. 2d 1099
Docket Number: Nos. 90-2197, 90-2198 and 90-2895
Parties: Sandra RUBIN, f/k/a Sandra Cohen, Appellant, v. NEW SUNRISE INVESTMENT CORP., Herman Cohen, and Charlotte Vogel, Appellees.
Judges: Before HUBBART, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 596
Pages: 1099–1099

Head Matter:
Sandra RUBIN, f/k/a Sandra Cohen, Appellant, v. NEW SUNRISE INVESTMENT CORP., Herman Cohen, and Charlotte Vogel, Appellees.
Nos. 90-2197, 90-2198 and 90-2895.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 3, 1992.
As Modified on Denial of Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc May 12, 1992.
Sinclair, Louis, Siegel, Heath, Nussbaum & Zavertnik and Leonard H. Rubin, Miami, for appellant.
Shalle Stephen Fine; Bedzow Korn Kan & Glaser and Allan M. Glaser, Miami, for appellees New Sunrise Inv. Corp'., and Herman Cohen.
Karen A. Gievers, Miami, for appellee Charlotte Vogel.
Before HUBBART, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Hynd v. Ireland, 582 So.2d 772 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Steigman v. Danese, 502 So.2d 463 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. denied, 511 So.2d 998 (Fla.1987); Tullo v. Horner, 296 So.2d 502 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); § 95.031(2).