Case Name: In the Matter of Albert M. Rosenblatt, as Chief Administrative Judge of the Unified Court System of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Harold R. Newman et al., Individually and as Members of the Public Employment Relations Board of the State of New York, et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 1.); In the Matter of Suffolk County Court Employees Association, Inc., Appellant, v. Harold R. Newman et al., Individually and as Members of the Public Employment Relations Board of the State of New York, et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 2.)
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1991-10-15
Citations: 78 N.Y.2d 1036
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Albert M. Rosenblatt, as Chief Administrative Judge of the Unified Court System of the State of New York, Appellant, v Harold R. Newman et al., Individually and as Members of the Public Employment Relations Board of the State of New York, et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Suffolk County Court Employees Association, Inc., Appellant, v Harold R. Newman et al., Individually and as Members of the Public Employment Relations Board of the State of New York, et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 2.)
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 78
Pages: 1036–1038

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Albert M. Rosenblatt, as Chief Administrative Judge of the Unified Court System of the State of New York, Appellant, v Harold R. Newman et al., Individually and as Members of the Public Employment Relations Board of the State of New York, et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Suffolk County Court Employees Association, Inc., Appellant, v Harold R. Newman et al., Individually and as Members of the Public Employment Relations Board of the State of New York, et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 2.)
Argued September 4, 1991;
decided October 15, 1991
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Gary Johnson, Michael Colodner and John Eiseman for Albert M. Rosenblatt, appellant.
David Schlachter for Suffolk County Court Employees Association, Inc., appellant.
John M. Crotty for Public Employment Relations Board, respondent.
Jerome Lefkowitz and Nancy E. Hoffman for Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
In each proceeding, order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Paul J. Yesawich, Jr., at the Appellate Division (164 AD2d 117).
Concur: Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa. Taking no part: Chief Judge Wachtler.