Case Name: In the Matter of the Arbitration between the Board of Higher Education of the City of New York, Appellant, and Randolph Brown, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1980-04-22
Citations: 49 N.Y.2d 935
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Arbitration between the Board of Higher Education of the City of New York, Appellant, and Randolph Brown, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 49
Pages: 935–937

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Arbitration between the Board of Higher Education of the City of New York, Appellant, and Randolph Brown, Respondent.
Argued March 21, 1980;
decided April 22, 1980
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Allen G. Schwartz, Corporation Counsel (David B. Rigney, Laura Blank and Paula J. Levitt), for appellant.
D. Nicholas Russo for respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
There is no showing that the arbitrator went beyond the question submitted for his determination. Having participated in the arbitration proceeding, the board may not subsequently move to vacate the award on the ground that the matter arbitrated was not arbitrable (Rochester City School Dist. v Rochester Teachers Assn., 41 NY2d 578, 583; see, also, Matter of Yonkers Federation of Teachers v Board of Educ., 46 NY2d 725).
There is no merit to appellant's argument that public policy has somehow been contravened by the arbitrator's award (Matter of Port Washington Union Free School Dist. v Teachers Assn., 45 NY2d 746).
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur in memorandum.
Order affirmed.