Case Name: Earnestine WILKES, Appellant, v. Joseph C. WILKES, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-12-07
Citations: 627 So. 2d 129
Docket Number: No. 93-403
Parties: Earnestine WILKES, Appellant, v. Joseph C. WILKES, Appellee.
Judges: Before NESBITT, COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 627
Pages: 129–129

Head Matter:
Earnestine WILKES, Appellant, v. Joseph C. WILKES, Appellee.
No. 93-403.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 7, 1993.
Arnold Hecker, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
Harvey D. Rogers, Miami, for appellee.
Before NESBITT, COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
As the point is not preserved for appellate review, the judgment is affirmed on authority of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a). In addition, the theory of appellant's appeal does not survive the decision in Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. Privette, 617 So.2d 305 (Fla.1993).
Affirmed.