Case Name: Satnam SINGH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2008-12-03
Citations: 995 So. 2d 1123
Docket Number: No. 4D07-3650
Parties: Satnam SINGH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: POLEN, KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 995
Pages: 1123–1123

Head Matter:
Satnam SINGH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D07-3650.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Dec. 3, 2008.
Satnam Singh, Swanton, Vermont, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant seeks review of the circuit court's summary denial of his seven-ground motion pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We affirm the circuit court's decision with exception to ground seven, which is affirmed without prejudice. The burden is upon the Department of Corrections to determine jail time credit for time spent incarcerated between sentencing and being placed in the custody of the department. § 921.161, Fla. Stat. (2007). As such, this affirmance is without prejudice to appellant's seeking post-sentencing jail credit, administratively, from the Department of Corrections. See Hastings v. State, 899 So.2d 458 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005).
POLEN, KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.