Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jamal Timothy HAWKINS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-03-09
Citations: 315 F. App'x 498
Docket Number: No. 08-8259
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jamal Timothy HAWKINS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 315
Pages: 498–499

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jamal Timothy HAWKINS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-8259.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 26, 2009.
Decided: March 9, 2009.
Frances H. Pratt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Jonathan Leo Fahey, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jamal Timothy Hawkins appeals the district court's order denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hawkins, No. 1:05-cr-00497-LMB-1 (E.D.Va. Oct. 7, 2008); see United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir.2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.