Case Name: Elizabeth Nunziata, Appellant, v. Peter E. Small and Catherine C. Small, Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1927-01
Citations: 219 A.D. 746
Docket Number: 
Parties: Elizabeth Nunziata, Appellant, v. Peter E. Small and Catherine C. Small, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 219
Pages: 746–746

Head Matter:
Elizabeth Nunziata, Appellant, v. Peter E. Small and Catherine C. Small, Respondents.

Opinion:
Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Aside from any other element of the case, plaintiff has neither pleaded nor proved the return of an execution against the property of the judgment debtor, unsatisfied in whole or in part. Such omission makes it impossible to maintain the action. (Adsit v. Butler, 87 N. Y. 585.) Present — Kelly, P. J., Manning, Young, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ.