Case Name: Launeil SANDERS; Janneth Sanders, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Henry McMASTER, State of South Carolina Authorized Agent, Chief Law Enforcement Officer, SC Attorney General; Trey Gowdy, State of South Carolina, SC 7th Solicitor; Mark Kitchens; David Ingalls; David Alford; Prepaid Legal, Inc., Its Authorized Representative Counsel Berry, Quackenbush, and Stuart, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-07-27
Citations: 328 F. App'x 878
Docket Number: No. 09-1664
Parties: Launeil SANDERS; Janneth Sanders, Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. Henry McMASTER, State of South Carolina Authorized Agent, Chief Law Enforcement Officer, SC Attorney General; Trey Gowdy, State of South Carolina, SC 7th Solicitor; Mark Kitchens; David Ingalls; David Alford; Prepaid Legal, Inc., Its Authorized Representative Counsel Berry, Quackenbush, and Stuart, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 328
Pages: 878–879

Head Matter:
Launeil SANDERS; Janneth Sanders, Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. Henry McMASTER, State of South Carolina Authorized Agent, Chief Law Enforcement Officer, SC Attorney General; Trey Gowdy, State of South Carolina, SC 7th Solicitor; Mark Kitchens; David Ingalls; David Alford; Prepaid Legal, Inc., Its Authorized Representative Counsel Berry, Quackenbush, and Stuart, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 09-1664.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 23, 2009.
Decided: July 27, 2009.
Launeil Sanders, Janneth Sanders, Appellants Pro Se. Mary Frances G. Jowers, South Carolina Attorney General’s Office, Columbia, South Carolina; Edwin Calhoun Haskell, III, Smith & Haskell, Spartan-burg, South Carolina; Christopher R. Ant-ley, Devlin & Parkinson, PA, Greenville, South Carolina; David Griffith Ingalls, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Launeil and Janneth Sanders appeal the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Sanders' 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint against Prepaid Legal, Inc and denying Sanders' motion for leave to file another complaint against Prepaid Legal, Inc. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sanders v. McMaster, No. 7:07-cv-03510-GRA, 2009 WL 1485034 (D.S.C. May 27, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.