Case Name: Steven E. WARMAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Wayne PHILIPS, Warden, Respondent-Appellee, and Federal Bureau of Prisons, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-11-25
Citations: 353 F. App'x 859
Docket Number: No. 09-7646
Parties: Steven E. WARMAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Wayne PHILIPS, Warden, Respondent-Appellee, and Federal Bureau of Prisons, Respondent.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 353
Pages: 859–860

Head Matter:
Steven E. WARMAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Wayne PHILIPS, Warden, Respondent-Appellee, and Federal Bureau of Prisons, Respondent.
No. 09-7646.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 17, 2009.
Decided: Nov. 25, 2009.
Steven E. Warman, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel W. Dickinson, Jr., Office of the United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Steven E. Warman, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Warman v. Philips, No. 1:08-cv-00217-IMK-JES, 2009 WL 2705833 (N.D.W.Va. Aug. 25, 2009) We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.