Case Name: Kevin BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Norman SELWIN, Dr., Individually, Benheim, Dr., Individually, Kotecha, Dr., of Saint Francis Hospital, Individually, P.A. Carbone, Individually, Owen, Dr., of Saint Agnes Hospital, Individually, Saint Francis Hospital, St. Agnes Hospital, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-03-06
Citations: 29 F. App'x 762
Docket Number: No. 01-0144
Parties: Kevin BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Norman SELWIN, Dr., Individually, Benheim, Dr., Individually, Kotecha, Dr., of Saint Francis Hospital, Individually, P.A. Carbone, Individually, Owen, Dr., of Saint Agnes Hospital, Individually, Saint Francis Hospital, St. Agnes Hospital, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 29
Pages: 762–762

Head Matter:
Kevin BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Norman SELWIN, Dr., Individually, Benheim, Dr., Individually, Kotecha, Dr., of Saint Francis Hospital, Individually, P.A. Carbone, Individually, Owen, Dr., of Saint Agnes Hospital, Individually, Saint Francis Hospital, St. Agnes Hospital, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 01-0144.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
March 6, 2002.
Kevin Brown, pro se, Stormville, NY, for Appellant.
David Lawrence III, Ass’t Sol. Gen., N.Y., NY, for Individual Appellees.-
Jonathan A. Bath, Pilkington & Leggett, White Plains, NY, for Appellee Saint Francis Hospital & Medical Center.
Edward J. Guardaro, Jr., Bartlett, Mc-Donough, Bastone & Monaghan, White Plains, NY, for Appellee St. Agnes Hospital.
Present KEARSE, JACOBS, and KEITH , Circuit Judges.
Honorable Damon J. Keith, of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
SUMMARY ORDER
This cause came on to be heard on the record from' the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and was submitted by plaintiff pro se and by counsel for defendants.
ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is now hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of said District Court be and it hereby is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Berman's Order dated May 10, 2001, and, to the extent reaffirmed in that Order, substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Berman's Decision and Order dated September 23,1999.
We have considered all of plaintiffs contentions on this appeal and have found them to be without merit. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.