Case Name: Hammel J. CLARK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kathyrn J. JACOBS, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-06-19
Citations: 474 F. App'x 197
Docket Number: No. 12-6402
Parties: Hammel J. CLARK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kathyrn J. JACOBS, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 474
Pages: 197–198

Head Matter:
Hammel J. CLARK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kathyrn J. JACOBS, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 12-6402.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 14, 2012.
Decided: June 19, 2012.
Hammel J. Clark, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Alexander Hinrichs, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Pikes-ville, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Hammel J. Clark appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Clark v. Jacobs, No. 8:11-cv-01555-RWT (D.Md. Feb. 21, 2012). We deny Clark's pending motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.