Case Name: Mann Theatres Corporation of California et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. Mid-Island Shopping Plaza Co., as Successor in Interest to Mid-Island Shopping Plaza, Inc., Respondent-Appellant, and Mid-Plaza Associates, as Successor in Interest to Mid Plaza Cinema, Inc., et al., Appellants-Respondents. (Action No. 1.); Mid-Island Shopping Plaza Co., Respondent-Appellant, v. Mid Plaza Cinema Associates et al., Appellants-Respondents. (Action No. 2.)
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1984-06-07
Citations: 62 N.Y.2d 930
Docket Number: 
Parties: Mann Theatres Corporation of California et al., Appellants-Respondents, v Mid-Island Shopping Plaza Co., as Successor in Interest to Mid-Island Shopping Plaza, Inc., Respondent-Appellant, and Mid-Plaza Associates, as Successor in Interest to Mid Plaza Cinema, Inc., et al., Appellants-Respondents. (Action No. 1.) Mid-Island Shopping Plaza Co., Respondent-Appellant, v Mid Plaza Cinema Associates et al., Appellants-Respondents. (Action No. 2.)
Judges: Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 62
Pages: 930–934

Head Matter:
Mann Theatres Corporation of California et al., Appellants-Respondents, v Mid-Island Shopping Plaza Co., as Successor in Interest to Mid-Island Shopping Plaza, Inc., Respondent-Appellant, and Mid-Plaza Associates, as Successor in Interest to Mid Plaza Cinema, Inc., et al., Appellants-Respondents. (Action No. 1.) Mid-Island Shopping Plaza Co., Respondent-Appellant, v Mid Plaza Cinema Associates et al., Appellants-Respondents. (Action No. 2.)
Argued May 8, 1984;
decided June 7, 1984
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Kenneth B. Forrest, Herbert M. Wachtell and Marc Wol-insky for Mann Theatres Corporation of California, appellant-respondent.
Michael D. Hess and Michael Luskin for Brighton The-atre Corporation, appellant-respondent.
Daniel L. Carroll, Milton Popper, Denise Y. Turner and A. Walter Socolow for Mid-Plaza Associates and another, appellants-respondents.
A. Thomas Levin and Theodore Daniels for respondent-appellant.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Cross appeal taken as or right by Mid-Island Shopping Plaza Co. dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that cross-appellant is not aggrieved by the modification at the Appellate Division (CPLR 5601, subd [a], par [iii]), and motion by cross-appellant made on oral argument for leave to appeal granted. Order affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Leon D. Lazer at the Appellate Division (94 AD2d 466); the remaining time within which appellants may cure the violation of paragraph 11 of the ground lease will commence to run on service on appellants, with notice of entry, of a copy of the order of Supreme Court, Nassau County, to be entered on the remittitur of this court.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.