Case Name: The State v. Joshua Ammons
Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction: North Carolina
Decision Date: 1819-05
Citations: 3 Mur. 123
Docket Number: 
Parties: The State v. Joshua Ammons.
Judges: 
Reporter: North Carolina Reports
Volume: 7
Pages: 123–127

Head Matter:
The State v. Joshua Ammons.
From Wayne.
Indictment for perjury charged that at a certain Court of Pleas and Quarter Sessions, held for the County of Wayne, on the third Monday of November, 1816, a certain issue duly joined in the said Court between A and B, in a certain plea of trespass on the case upon promises, in which the said A was Plaintiff and the said B was Defendant, came on to be tried; and that upon the trial of said isme so joined, C was examined as a witness, and committed the perjury set forth in the indictment. The transcript of the record of this suit, offered in evidence upon the trial of the indictment, did not show that any issue had been joined. The Defendant was convicted, and a new trial granted, upon the ground that the transcript of the record did not support the charge in the indictment.
In an indictment for perjury, it is necessary to set forth that the oath was • taken in some judicial proceeding, before a competent jurisdiction, and upon a point material to the issue depending; and by the common law, it was necessary to set forth the record of the cause wherein the perjury alleged is charged to have been committed; to prove on the trial that there is such a record, by producing it, or a certified copy thereof s and when produced, it must agree with that set forth in the'
, indictment, without any material variance.
Since the act of 1/91, ch. /, it is not necessary to set forth the record of the cause, in the indictment: But if it be recited, the recital must be correct, or the prosecution must fail.
The Defendant was indicted for perjury, committed in Wayne County Court, upon the trial of a suit between John Ammons and Robert G-. Green. The indictment was as follows : to wit, '
“ State of JVorth-Caroliim, 1 Superior Court of Law, the fii'st Monday after Wayne County. 5 the fourth Monday of March, A. D. 181/.
“ The Jurors for the State, upon their oath present, that at a Court of “ Pleas and Quarter Sessions holden for the County of Wayne, before the “Justices of the said Court, on the third Monday of November, in the “ year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixteen, at the town “ of Waynesborough, in the said county of Wayne, agreeably to the act “ of the General Assembly in such case made and provided, a certain issue “ duly joined in the said Court, between John Ammons and Robert G. <! Green, in a certain plea of trespass on the case upon promises, in which “ the said John Ammons was the Plaintiff, and the said Robert G. Green “ the Defendant, came on to be tried in due form of law, and was the» “ and there tried by a Jury of the county in that behalf duly sworn and « taken between the parties aforesaid: and the Jurors aforesaid, upon “ oath aforesaid, do further present, that upon the trial of the said “ issue so joined between the parties aforesaid, Joshua Ammons late of “ the county of Wayne, laborer, appeared as a witness for and in behalf “ of the said Robert G. Green, the Defendant in the issue aforesaid, and “ was sworn, and then and there took his corporal oath upon tire holy ct gospel of God before the said Court, to speak the truth and nothing “ but the truth, touching and concerning the matter in' question in the “ said issue, the said Court then and there having sufficient and compe- “ tent power and authority to administer an path to the said Joshua Am* “ mons in that behalf: And the Jurors aforesaid, upon their oath afore- “ said, do further present, that upon the trial of the said issue so- joined “ between the parties aforesaid, certain questions then and there became K and were material, that is to say, whether he the said Joshua Ammons “ had sold to the said Robert G. Green, the Defendant, a certain quantity cc of pork belonging to the said John Ammons, the Plaintiff, and thebro- “ ther of the said Joshua Ammons, and whether he the said Joshua Am- “ mons had told him the said Robert G. Green, that he the said Robert “ G. Green could have a certain quantity of pork belonging to the said K John Ammons, the brother of the said Joshua Ammons, at the price of “ seven dollars and a quarter the hundred weight, and that the said Joshua “ Ammons beingso sworn as aforesaid, not having the fear of God before <e his eyes, nor regarding the laws of the State, but being moved and seduc- “ ed by tne instigation of the Devil, and falsely, wickedly, wilfully and mali- “ ciously contriving and intending as much as in himlay, to prevent justice, “ and to prevent tlie due course of law and to cause a verdict to pass against “ the said Robert G. Green on the trial of the said issue, and thereby to “ subject him the said Robert G. Green to the payment of sundry heavy “ costs, charges, and expences, then and there on the twentieth day of “ November, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and six- “ teen aforesaid, at the County of Wayne aforesaid, falsely, wickedly, wil- “ fully, maliciously and corruptly, and by his own act and consent did say, “ depose, swear, and give in evidence, among other things, to and before c< the said Jurors so sworn to try the said issue as aforesaid, and the said “ Court, in substance and to the efiect following, that is to say, that he “ the said Joshua Ammons did not sell his brother’s pork, (meaning the ££ aforesaid quantity of pork belonging to tire said John Ammons, the bro- “ ther of the said Joshua Ammons) to the said Robert G. Green: and that “ he (meaning the said Joshua Ammons) did not tell him (meaning the “ said Robert G. Green) that he (meaning the said Robert G. Green) “ could have the pork (meaning the aforesaid quantity of pork belonging “ to the said John Ammons) at the price of seven dollars and a quarter * the hundred weight: whereas in truth and in fact, he the said Joshua V Ammons, before tire taking of his oath as aforesaid, to wit, on the seventh " day of January in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and “ sixteen, at the County ot Wayne aforesaid, had sold to him the said lío- “ bert G. Green, the aforesaid quantity of pork belonging to the said “ John Ammons; and whereas m truth and in fact the said Joshua Am- “ mons, before the taking of his oath as aforesaid, to wit, on the said « seventh day of January, in the year last aforesaid, at the County of *e Wayne aforesaid, had told the said Robert G. Geeen that he the said K Robert G. Green could have the aforesaid quantity of pork belonging to ** John Ammons, the brother of the said Joshua Ammons, at the price of seven dollars and a quarter the hundred weight: And the Jurors afore- “ said, upon their oath aforesaid, do say, that the said Joshua Ammons, on “ the said twentieth day of November, in the year of our Lord one thou- “ sand eight hundred and sixteen aforesaid, at the County of Wayne “ aforesaid, before the said Court, having competent and sufficient power *e and authority to administer the said oath to the said Joshua Ammons as “ aforesaid, by his own act and consent, and of his own most wicked and ** corrupt mind and disposition, in manner and form aforesaid, upon his “ oath aforesaid, did falsely, wickedly, wilfully, maliciously and corruptly “ commit wilful and corrupt perjury, to the great displeasure of Almighty “ God, in contempt of the laws of the State, to the great damage of the “ said Robert G. Green, to the evil example of all others in like cases " offending, contrary to the act of the General Assembly in such cases •* made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the State.
“ J. R. DONNELL, Sol.”
Upon the trial of the indictment, the Solicitor for the State offered in evidence the following certified copy of the record of the suit named in the indictment; to wit:
“ STATE OE NORTH-CAROLINA.
To the Sheriff of Wayne County, Greeting :
“ You are hereby commanded to take the body of Robert G. Green, if ■a to be found in your County, and him safely keep so that you have him a before the Justices of our Court of Pleas and Quarter Sessions at the “ Court to be held for the County of Wayne, at the Court-house in Waynesborough, on the third Monday in May next, then and there to “ answer John Ammons in a plea of trespass on die case to his damage “ four hundred pounds. — Herein fail not and have you then and there “ tilis writ. Witness, John McKinnie, Clerk of said Court at Office, the “ thud Monday of February, A. D. 1816, and in the 40th year of our “Independence.
“ JOUN McIONNIE, C. C,
* Issued the 6th day of April, A. D. 1816.”
“ The subscribers acknowedge themselves bound in the sum of one “ hundred pounds for the prosecution of this suit.
“JOHN AMMONS, (Seal.)
“H. COOK, (Seal.)
“ Executed,
“ WM. RAIFOKD, Sheriff.
“ State of JVorth- Carolina,) Court of Ideas and Quarter Sessions, Wayne County. ) November Term, 1816.
r “ Jury charged, find for the Plaintiff on “ John Ammons ") „r | all tire issues, and assess his damages to v. V ^ four hundred and twenty-three dollars “ Robert G. Green, j ' ] and thirty cents, and costs; of which L_ü§405:08, is principal.”
On behalf of the Defendant, it was urged upon the trial that this copy of the record did not shew that any issue had been joined between the parties, and therefore did not support the charge in the indictment.' — The Jury found the Defendant guilty ; and a rule for a new trial being obtained, the same was sent to this Court.

Opinion:
Haxe, Judge,
delivered the opinion of the Court.
In a case of perjury, it is necessary to be charged that {lie oath was taken in a judicial proceeding before a competent jurisdiction, and upon a point material to the issue depending. In the indictment, it is necessary to set forth the record of the cause wherein the perjury complained of, is charged to have been committed, and also to prove on the trial that there is such a record, by producing it; and when produced it must agree with that set forth in the indictment, without any material variance. In this case, the indictment states that the perjury was committed " on a certain issue duly joined in the said Court " between Robert Ammons and Robert G. Green." The record produced does not shew that there had been any issue joined. The copy of the record is certified by the proper officer of the Court, and we are bound to receive it as a true copy, though the fact may be, (and the finding of the Jury renders it probable) that issue had been joined. « The Jury find for the Plaintiff on " all the issues," when it does not appear that any issue had been joined, In the case of the King v. Dowlin, where the Defendant was indicted for perjury committed on the trial of captain Kimber for murder, one reason urged in arrest of judgment was, that no plea appeared by the record to hare been pleaded on the trial of Kimber, and consequently there could not have been a legal trial, in which perjury could have been committed. The Court seemed to think this might have been a good reason at common law ; but that by the statute of Geo. 2, ch. 11, it is not necessary to set forth the record or any part thereof, in which the perjury is alleged to have been committed, but only to set forth the substance of the offence charged upon the Defendant : and in that case, the indictment did not recite the record of the trial against Kimber, but only stated that at a Court of Oyer and Terminer, Kimber was in due form of law tried upon a certain indictment for the murder of A. Our act of Assembly passed in the year 1791, ch. 7, sect. 3, is copied from that statute. But the difference between the case of the King v. Dowlin and the present case, is tills; in that case the indictment did not recite the record in which Kimber was tried, and in which it was alleged the perjury was committed j in this case, the indictriient recites the record, and no such record as that recited is produced. It is not necessary that the record should be recited ; yet if it be attempted, the recital must be correct, or the prosecution must fail. The rule for a new trial must be made absolute.
1 Term Rep. 69.
1 Haw. 333, Sect, 23,6 Mod. 168.
5 Term 311.
2 Haw. 349. The King v. Dowlin, 5 Term Rep. 311. 5 Dur. 2084. 9 Stra. 775.