Case Name: NORTH & EAST RIVER STEAMBOAT CO. v. NEW YORK, N. H. & H. R. CO.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1908-05-22
Citations: 162 F. 682
Docket Number: No. 244
Parties: NORTH & EAST RIVER STEAMBOAT CO. v. NEW YORK, N. H. & H. R. CO.
Judges: Before LACOMBE, WARD, and NOYIJS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter
Volume: 162
Pages: 682–683

Head Matter:
NORTH & EAST RIVER STEAMBOAT CO. v. NEW YORK, N. H. & H. R. CO.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
May 22, 1908.)
No. 244.
Collision— Steamer and Tows — Negligent Navigation of Tows.
Evidence hold sufficient to sustain a finding that libelant's vessel was injured in a collision due to the fault of respondent's tows, which were spread out so as to occupy the greater part of the channel.
[Ed. Note. — Eor cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 10, Collision, §§ 200-202.]
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
James 'Jo Kilbretli and William Greeuough, for appellant.
Carpenter, Park & Symmers, for appellee.
Before LACOMBE, WARD, and NOYIJS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Practically the only question raised upon this appeal is whether there was a collision. The libelant's vessel was evidently injured in some way, and its witnesses testify affirmatively that the collision occurred substantially as stated in the libel. On the other hand, the testimony of respondent's witnesses, while mostly negative in character, tends to show that no such collision took place at all.
The burden of proof is upon the libelant. Still, considering all the testimony and all the circumstances, but without reviewing them here, we reach the conclusion that the libelant has sustained this burden, atid has shown that a collision took place on the east side of the channel. Inasmuch as the various tows qC the respondent, instead of following each other, were spread out into a flotilla which practically occupied three-quarters of the entire channel, we have no difficulty in reaching the conclusion that such navigation was negligent, and was the cause of the collision.
Decree affirmed, with interest and costs.