Case Name: Fred Hersh and William Hershkowitz, partners, &c., respondents, v. United Retail Employees of Newark, New Jersey, Local No. 108, et al., appellants
Court: New Jersey Court of Chancery
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1944-01-27
Citations: 134 N.J. Eq. 410
Docket Number: 
Parties: Fred Hersh and William Hershkowitz, partners, &c., respondents, v. United Retail Employees of Newark, New Jersey, Local No. 108, et al., appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 134
Pages: 410–410

Head Matter:
Fred Hersh and William Hershkowitz, partners, &c., respondents, v. United Retail Employees of Newark, New Jersey, Local No. 108, et al., appellants.
[Decided January 27th, 1944.]
Mr. Michael Silver, for the respondents.
Mr. Samuel L. Uothbari, for the appellants.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Stein, and reported at 133 N. J. Eq. 295.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Parker, Case, Donges, Porter, Colie, Dear, Wells, Thompson, Dill, JJ. 10.
For reversal — Bodine, Hehbr, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 4.