Case Name: Central Hanover Bank and Trust Company, Respondent-Appellant, v. James R. Gould et al., Defendants, and Reitha E. Barsky, Defendant-Appellant and Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1944-12-11
Citations: 268 A.D. 995
Docket Number: 
Parties: Central Hanover Bank and Trust Company, Respondent-Appellant, v. James R. Gould et al., Defendants, and Reitha E. Barsky, Defendant-Appellant and Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 268
Pages: 995–995

Head Matter:
(December 11, 1944.)
Central Hanover Bank and Trust Company, Respondent-Appellant, v. James R. Gould et al., Defendants, and Reitha E. Barsky, Defendant-Appellant and Respondent.

Opinion:
In a foreclosure action, defendant Barsky appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) which allowed and fixed a deficiency of $1,361.10, while plaintiff cross-appeals from so much of the order and judgment as modifies the report of an official referee by reducing the deficiency from $2,361.10 to $1,361.10. Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Aldrich, JJ.