Case Name: C. L. NORTHCUTT and Theo D. Northcutt, his wife, Petitioners, v. STATE ROAD DEPARTMENT of Florida, an Agency of the State of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1969-02-19
Citations: 219 So. 2d 687
Docket Number: No. 37539
Parties: C. L. NORTHCUTT and Theo D. Northcutt, his wife, Petitioners, v. STATE ROAD DEPARTMENT of Florida, an Agency of the State of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: ERVIN, C. J., and THORNAL, ADKINS, BOYD and CALDWELL (Retired), JL, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 219
Pages: 687–688

Head Matter:
C. L. NORTHCUTT and Theo D. Northcutt, his wife, Petitioners, v. STATE ROAD DEPARTMENT of Florida, an Agency of the State of Florida, Respondent.
No. 37539.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Feb. 19, 1969.
Rehearing Denied March 25, 1969.
Brigham & Brigham and E. F. P. Brigham, Miami, for petitioners.
P. A. Pacyna and Louis St. Laurent, Tallahassee, for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. After argument and upon further consideration, we have determined the writ was improvidently issued. The writ must be and is discharged and the petition is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
ERVIN, C. J., and THORNAL, ADKINS, BOYD and CALDWELL (Retired), JL, concur.