Case Name: Winifred ARCHER, Petitioner on Review, v. LETICA CORPORATION, a Michigan Corporation, Respondent on Review, and Glenn TERRIS, Defendant
Court: Oregon Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1996-07-23
Citations: 323 Or. 335
Docket Number: CC 89-2012; CA A74792; SC S41235
Parties: Winifred ARCHER, Petitioner on Review, v. LETICA CORPORATION, a Michigan Corporation, Respondent on Review, and Glenn TERRIS, Defendant.
Judges: Before Carson, Chief Justice, and Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Unis, Graber and Durham, Justices.
Reporter: Oregon Reports
Volume: 323
Pages: 335–335

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted January 5, 1995,
affirmed by an equally divided court June 13, reconsideration denied July 23, 1996
Winifred ARCHER, Petitioner on Review, v. LETICA CORPORATION, a Michigan Corporation, Respondent on Review, and Glenn TERRIS, Defendant.
(CC 89-2012; CA A74792; SC S41235)
917 P2d 1024
Hank McCurdy, Portland, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioner on review.
I. Franklin Hunsaker, of Bullivant, Houser, Bailey, Pen-dergrass & Hoffman, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent on review.
David J. Riewald and Kirk S. Peterson, of Bullard, Korshoj, Smith & Jernstedt, Portland, filed a brief on behalf of amicus curiae Oregon Association of Defense Counsel.
Before Carson, Chief Justice, and Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Unis, Graber and Durham, Justices.
Fadeley, J., did not participate in this decision.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Affirmed by an equally divided court.