Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Russell Allen ERXLEBEN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-07-12
Citations: 535 F. App'x 424
Docket Number: No. 13-50484
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Russell Allen ERXLEBEN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before JOLLY, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 535
Pages: 424–425

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Russell Allen ERXLEBEN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-50484
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
July 12, 2013.
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Kristin M. Etter, Esq., Sumpter & Gonzalez, L.L.P., Austin, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before JOLLY, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
A magistrate judge ordered Russell Allen Erxleben detained pending trial for wire fraud, engaging in a monetary transaction in criminally derived property, and securities fraud. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(c). A person ordered detained by a magistrate judge is to seek review in the district court by filing "a motion for revocation or amendment of the order." 18 U.S.C. § 3145(b); see United States v. Gage, 990 F.2d 625, 1993 WL 117780 at *1 (5th Cir. 1993) (unpublished); 5th Cir. R. 47.5.3. Instead of seeking such review, Erxleben moves in this court for revocation of the magistrate judge's order. We, however, lack jurisdiction to grant the requested relief. See Gage, 990 F.2d at 625. Consequently, Erxleben's appeal is DISMISSED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.