Case Name: Michael Jerome McCRAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1996-04-09
Citations: 671 So. 2d 246
Docket Number: No. 95-1905
Parties: Michael Jerome McCRAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ERVIN, MINER and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 671
Pages: 246–246

Head Matter:
Michael Jerome McCRAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 95-1905.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
April 9, 1996.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; James W. Rogers, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In this direct criminal appeal, the public defender has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).' Although afforded an opportunity to do so, appellant has elected not to file a brief in proper person. Having reviewed the entire record, we agree that no reversible error occurred. Accordingly, we affirm appellant's convictions and sentences. However, we vacate the lien for attorney fees imposed upon appellant because appellant was not afforded notice of intent to seek such a lien, or an opportunity to contest its amount. E.g., Bryant v. State, 661 So.2d 1315 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); L.A.D. v. State, 616 So.2d 106 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 624 So.2d 268 (Fla.1993). On remand, a lien may again be impósed, provided that appellant is given notice and an opportunity to contest its amount.
AFFIRMED and REMANDED, with directions.
ERVIN, MINER and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.