Case Name: In the Matter of the Claim of Viola Brown, Respondent. Edward Corsi, as Industrial Commissioner, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1953-03-18
Citations: 281 A.D. 935
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of the Claim of Viola Brown, Respondent. Edward Corsi, as Industrial Commissioner, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 281
Pages: 935–935

Head Matter:
In the Matter of the Claim of Viola Brown, Respondent. Edward Corsi, as Industrial Commissioner, Appellant.

Opinion:
Appeal by the Industrial Commissioner from decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which modified the decision of an unemployment insurance referee disqualifying claimant for insurance benefits. Claimant was a woman seventy years of age. Her son, her husband and herself were officers of a corporation known as the Federal Broadcasting System, Inc., which operated a radio station in Rochester, New York. Claimant was secretary of the corporation, her husband was treasurer, and their son was president. The latter owned all of the stock. The corporation was a .family affair and the amount of salaries paid to the corporate officers depended on the profits in any given year. These amounts were determined solely by the son, who was the president and sole owner of the stock. At the close of the business year 1950 it was determined that the financial affairs of the corporation did not warrant payment of any salary to claimant. The issues presented upon appeal are whether claimant, as a corporate officer performing services without compensation because of the financial condition of the corporation, was totally unemployed within the meaning of the statute, and whether she was available for employment within the meaning of the same statute. We think there is no substantial evidence in the record to sustain the determination that claimant was available for employment and, therefore, eligible for benefits and hence that such a decision was erroneous as a matter of law. We also think that the record fails to furnish any substantial proof to sustain a finding that claimant was totally unemployed. Decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board reversed, on the law, without costs. Foster, P. J., Brewster, Bergan, Coon and Imrie, JJ., concur.