Case Name: J.M.A., Petitioner, v. C.C.A., Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2001-11-29
Citations: 803 So. 2d 705
Docket Number: No. SC96935
Parties: J.M.A., Petitioner, v. C.C.A., Respondent.
Judges: WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 803
Pages: 705–706

Head Matter:
J.M.A., Petitioner, v. C.C.A., Respondent.
No. SC96935.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Nov. 29, 2001.
Richard R. Garland of Dickinson & Gibbons, P.A., Sarasota, FL, for Petitioner.
Larry'K Coleman, Bradenton, FL, for Respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted review of the opinion in C.C.A. v. J.M.A., 744 So.2d 515 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999), based on alleged express and direct conflict with the opinion in Dan iel v. Daniel, 695 So.2d 1253 (Fla.1997). Upon further consideration, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss review of this cause.
It is so ordered.
WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
LEWIS, J., dissents with an opinion.