Case Name: BARBARA KNOBLOCK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. MICHAEL J. KNOBLOCK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1972-06-15
Citations: 119 N.J. Super. 432
Docket Number: 
Parties: BARBARA KNOBLOCK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. MICHAEL J. KNOBLOCK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 119
Pages: 432–433

Head Matter:
BARBARA KNOBLOCK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. MICHAEL J. KNOBLOCK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued June 6, 1972
Decided June 15, 1972.
Before Judges Labkecqtje, Kolovsky and Allooen.
Mr. Seymour G-elzer argued the cause for the appellant (Iaria and Oelzer, attorneys).
Mr. John V. Burns argued the cause for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The county district court had no jurisdiction of this suit by a wife against her husband for arrearages under a support and maintenance agreement. The suit is cognizable only in the Chancery Division. Bendler v. Bendler, 3 N. J. 161 (1949); N. J. S. A. 2A:6-34; N. J. S. A. 37:2-5.
The judgment of the county district court in favor of the plaintiff is reversed, and the cause is remanded with directions that it be transferred to the Chancery Division of the Superior Court, Middlesex County, R. 1:13-4.