Case Name: SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, L.P., Plaintiff-Appellant v. COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, Comcast IP Phone, LLC, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-01-11
Citations: 675 F. App'x 974
Docket Number: 2015-1989
Parties: SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, L.P., Plaintiff-Appellant v. COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, Comcast IP Phone, LLC, Defendants-Appellees
Judges: (Dyk, Taranto, and Hughes, Circuit Judges).
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 675
Pages: 974–975

Head Matter:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, L.P., Plaintiff-Appellant v. COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, Comcast IP Phone, LLC, Defendants-Appellees
2015-1989
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
January 11, 2017
John D. Gaeretson, Shook, Hardy & Bacon, LLP, Kansas City, MO, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by Basil Trent Webb: David Morehan, Rob Reckers, Houston, TX.
Matthew B. Lehr, Davis Polk & Ward-well LLP, Menlo Park, CA, argued' for defendants-appellees. Also represented by David Lisson, Gareth DeWalt, Micah Block, Anthony I. Fenwick; Michael Louis Brody, Winston & Strawn LLP, Chicago, IL.
(Dyk, Taranto, and Hughes, Circuit Judges).

Opinion:
JUDGMENT
Pei* Curiam
This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.