Case Name: Daniel E. HEILY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE; Johnnie Frazier, Inspector General, Office of Inspector General, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-09-29
Citations: 144 F. App'x 329
Docket Number: No. 05-1440
Parties: Daniel E. HEILY, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE; Johnnie Frazier, Inspector General, Office of Inspector General, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 144
Pages: 329–330

Head Matter:
Daniel E. HEILY, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE; Johnnie Frazier, Inspector General, Office of Inspector General, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 05-1440.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 27, 2005.
Decided: Sept. 29, 2005.
Daniel E. Heily, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Jason Mikolashek, Brian Eugene Bentley, Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Daniel E. Heily appeals the district court's order dismissing his action seeking relief under the Freedom of Information Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Heily v. United States Dep't of Commerce, No. CA-04-1070 (E.D.Va. Apr. 5, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED