Case Name: Kenneth Emanuel BAPTISTE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-03-21
Citations: 225 F. App'x 625
Docket Number: No. 05-56776
Parties: Kenneth Emanuel BAPTISTE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 225
Pages: 625–626

Head Matter:
Kenneth Emanuel BAPTISTE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 05-56776.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 12, 2007.
Filed March 21, 2007.
Kenneth Emanuel Baptiste, Susanville, CA, pro se.
Richard J. Houle, Esq., Houle & Houle, Pasadena, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: KOZINSKI, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
California state prisoner Kenneth Emanuel Baptiste appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing without prejudice his state law negligence claim. We review for abuse of discretion the district court's refusal to exercise supplemental jurisdiction. See Ove v. Gwinn, 264 F.3d 817, 821 (9th Cir.2001). We affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion when it declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Baptiste's state claims after it had granted summary judg ment on all claims over which it had original jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c); cf. Bahrampour v. Lampert, 356 F.3d 969, 978 (9th Cir.2004).
The remaining contentions lack merit.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.