Case Name: IN the INTEREST OF R.C. Ashley Peterson, L.C.S.W., Petitioner and Appellee v. R.C., a child, Respondent and T.V., mother, C.C., father, Respondents and Appellants
Court: North Dakota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: North Dakota
Decision Date: 2018-05-08
Citations: 910 N.W.2d 860
Docket Number: No. 20180090
Parties: IN the INTEREST OF R.C.
Judges: 
Reporter: North Western Reporter 2d
Volume: 910
Pages: 860–861

Head Matter:
IN the INTEREST OF R.C.
Ashley Peterson, L.C.S.W., Petitioner and Appellee
v.
R.C., a child, Respondent
and
T.V., mother, C.C., father, Respondents and Appellants
No. 20180090
Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Filed May 8, 2018
Pam H. Ormand (on brief), Assistant State's Attorney, Fargo, ND, for petitioner and appellee.
Daniel E. Gast (on brief), Fargo, ND, for respondent and appellant C.C.
Elizabeth J. Sundby (on brief), Fargo, ND, for respondent and appellant T.V.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
[¶1] T.V. and C.C., the mother and father of R.C., appeal from a juvenile court order terminating their parental rights. The juvenile court found the child was deprived, the conditions and causes of the deprivation were likely to continue, and the child was suffering or would probably suffer serious harm in the future. On appeal, T.V. and C.C. argue there was not clear and convincing evidence to support a termination of their parental rights. The juvenile court's findings are supported by clear and convincing evidence and are not clearly erroneous. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Jon J. Jensen
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers
Jerod E. Tufte