Case Name: In the Matter of S. C. D., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. S. C. D., Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2008-10-01
Citations: 222 Or. App. 523
Docket Number: 070969097; A137010
Parties: In the Matter of S. C. D., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. S. C. D., Appellant.
Judges: Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Sercombe, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 222
Pages: 523–524

Head Matter:
Submitted August 1,
reversed October 1, 2008
In the Matter of S. C. D., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. S. C. D., Appellant.
Multnomah County Circuit Court
070969097; A137010
193 P3d 1055
Daniel J. Casey filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Laura S. Anderson, Senior Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Sercombe, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that he is unable to provide for his basic needs because of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(1)(d). The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. On de novo review of the record, we accept the state's concession and reverse.
Reversed.