Case Name: Crystal SELLS, etc., Petitioner, v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2017-04-13
Citations: 214 So. 3d 1232
Docket Number: No. SC15-1639
Parties: Crystal SELLS, etc., Petitioner, v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., Respondent.
Judges: LABARGA, C.J., and POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 214
Pages: 1232–1232

Head Matter:
Crystal SELLS, etc., Petitioner, v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., Respondent.
No. SC15-1639
Supreme Court of Florida.
[April 13, 2017]
John S. Mills and Andrew D. Manko of The Mills Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, Florida, for Petitioner
Andrew J. Knight, II, of Moseley Prich-ard Parrish Knight & Jones, Jacksonville, Florida; and Evan M. Tager and Michael B. Kimberly of Mayer Brown LLP, Washington, District of Columbia, for Respondent
Jeffrey R. White of Center for Constitutional Litigation, P.C., Washington, District of Columbia, for Amicus Curiae American Association for Justice
Daniel Saphire of Association of American Railroads, Washington, District of Columbia; and Wendy F. Lumish and Alina Alonso Rodriguez of Bowman and Brooke LLP, Miami, Florida, for Amicus Curiae Association of American Railroads
Mark K. Delegal and Tiffany A. Roddenberry of Holland & Knight LLP, Tallahassee, Florida; and William W. Large of Florida Justice Reform Institute, Tallahassee, Florida, for Amicus Curiae Florida Justice Reform Institute

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the First District Court of Appeal in Sells v. CSX Transportation, Inc., 170 So.3d 27 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction.
It is so ordered.
LABARGA, C.J., and POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.
CANADY, J., concurs in result.
PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., dissent.