Case Name: R.F., the father, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2007-02-28
Citations: 949 So. 2d 357
Docket Number: No. 4D06-2508
Parties: R.F., the father, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.
Judges: WARNER, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 949
Pages: 357–358

Head Matter:
R.F., the father, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.
No. 4D06-2508.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb. 28, 2007.
Felicia Shaman of Law Office of Felicia Shaman, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeffrey P. Bassett, Assistant Attorney General, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Based on appellee's concession of error, we reverse the order denying the father's motion for reunification and terminating protective supervision for the reasons stated in H.G. v. Department of Children & Families, 916 So.2d 1006 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). We remand this case to the trial court for a determination of whether the father substantially complied with his case plan. If the father has substantially complied with his case plan and the court is satisfied that unification will not be detrimental to the child's safety, well-being, and physical, mental, and emotional health, the court shall return the minor child to his father. See § 39.701(9)0»), Fla. Stat. (2006).
Reversed.
WARNER, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.