Case Name: William Scott DAVIS, II, and a "Minor J.F.D" as next best friend, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of NORTH CAROLINA, "Pat McCory" individually and as Governor; Wake County N.C., Department of Human Services, "Ramon Rojano" individually and as Director; Wake County N.C., Family Court, "Donald Steven" Chief Superior Court Judge 10th Judicial District of Wake County North Carolina individually and in his official capacities, Defendants-Appellees; William Scott Davis, II, and a "Minor J.F.D" as next best friend, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of North Carolina, "Pat McCory" individually and as Governor; Wake County N.C., Department of Human Services, "Ramon Rojano" individually and as Director; Wake County N.C., Family Court, "Donald Steven" Chief Superior Court Judge, 10th Judicial District of Wake County North Carolina, individually and in his official capacities, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-07-22
Citations: 534 F. App'x 185
Docket Number: Nos. 13-1627, 13-1715
Parties: William Scott DAVIS, II, and a “Minor J.F.D” as next best friend, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of NORTH CAROLINA, “Pat McCory” individually and as Governor; Wake County N.C., Department of Human Services, “Ramon Rojano” individually and as Director; Wake County N.C., Family Court, “Donald Steven” Chief Superior Court Judge 10th Judicial District of Wake County North Carolina individually and in his official capacities, Defendants-Appellees. William Scott Davis, II, and a “Minor J.F.D” as next best friend, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of North Carolina, “Pat McCory” individually and as Governor; Wake County N.C., Department of Human Services, “Ramon Rojano” individually and as Director; Wake County N.C., Family Court, “Donald Steven” Chief Superior Court Judge, 10th Judicial District of Wake County North Carolina, individually and in his official capacities, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 534
Pages: 185–186

Head Matter:
William Scott DAVIS, II, and a “Minor J.F.D” as next best friend, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of NORTH CAROLINA, “Pat McCory” individually and as Governor; Wake County N.C., Department of Human Services, “Ramon Rojano” individually and as Director; Wake County N.C., Family Court, “Donald Steven” Chief Superior Court Judge 10th Judicial District of Wake County North Carolina individually and in his official capacities, Defendants-Appellees. William Scott Davis, II, and a “Minor J.F.D” as next best friend, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of North Carolina, “Pat McCory” individually and as Governor; Wake County N.C., Department of Human Services, “Ramon Rojano” individually and as Director; Wake County N.C., Family Court, “Donald Steven” Chief Superior Court Judge, 10th Judicial District of Wake County North Carolina, individually and in his official capacities, Defendants-Appellees.
Nos. 13-1627, 13-1715.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 18, 2013.
Decided: July 22, 2013.
William Scott Davis, II, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
William Scott Davis, II, appeals the district court's order dismissing his "Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Emergency Motion for Return of Child Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241-2254" pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2006). Davis also appeals the district court's orders denying his motion to appoint counsel and motion to stay. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. North Carolina, No. 4:13-cv-00055-RBS-DEM (E.D. Va. May 6, 2013; May 14, 2013). We deny Davis' motions to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.