Case Name: Thomas Joseph COYNE, Ph.D., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joseph MANCHIN, III, Secretary of State of West Virginia, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-10-20
Citations: 112 F. App'x 269
Docket Number: No. 04-2088
Parties: Thomas Joseph COYNE, Ph.D., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joseph MANCHIN, III, Secretary of State of West Virginia, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 112
Pages: 269–269

Head Matter:
Thomas Joseph COYNE, Ph.D., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joseph MANCHIN, III, Secretary of State of West Virginia, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 04-2088.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 4, 2004.
Decided: Oct. 20, 2004.
Thomas Joseph Coyne, Ph.D., Appellant pro se.
William S. Steele, Deputy Attorney General, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Thomas Joseph Coyne, Ph.D., appeals the district court's order denying his motion for an expedited preliminary injunction. We grant Coyne's motion for an expedited appeal. ' We review the denial of preliminary injunctive relief for abuse of discretion. Planned Parenthood v. Cambios, 155 F.3d 352, 359 (4th Cir.1998) (en banc). We have reviewed the record and find no such abuse of discretion here. Accordingly, we affirm the ruling of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED