Case Name: PESCADO LOCO, L.L.C., Appellant, v. CHESTERFIELD CENTER CORP., Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2007-04-24
Citations: 229 S.W.3d 125
Docket Number: No. ED 88657
Parties: PESCADO LOCO, L.L.C., Appellant, v. CHESTERFIELD CENTER CORP., Respondent.
Judges: Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J„ and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 229
Pages: 125–126

Head Matter:
PESCADO LOCO, L.L.C., Appellant, v. CHESTERFIELD CENTER CORP., Respondent.
No. ED 88657.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
April 24, 2007.
Application for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied June 7, 2007.
Application for Transfer Denied Aug. 21, 2007.
Thomas L. Caradnna, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Peter W. Herzog, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.
Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J„ and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Pescado Loco, L.L.C. ("Tenant") appeals from the order and judgment of the trial court granting Chesterfield Center Corporation's ("Landlord") motion for summary judgment, and finding that the lease between Landlord and Tenant had been validly terminated, and ordering Tenant to vacate the leased premises in St. Louis County, Missouri. Tenant also appeals the denial of its motion for summary judgment.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).