Case Name: James SLEVIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WACHOVIA INSURANCE SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-08-02
Citations: 140 F. App'x 478
Docket Number: No. 05-1062
Parties: James SLEVIN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. WACHOVIA INSURANCE SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 140
Pages: 478–478

Head Matter:
James SLEVIN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. WACHOVIA INSURANCE SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 05-1062.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 22, 2005.
Decided: Aug. 2, 2005.
Matthew G. Hjortsberg, Bowie & Jensen, L.L.C., Towson, Maryland, for Appellant. Darrell R. VanDeusen, Clifford B. Geiger, Kollman & Saucier, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
James Slevin appeals the district court's order dismissing his breach of contract action, in which he sought a declaratory judgment from the district court regarding the parties' rights under the employment agreement he entered into with Wachovia Insurance Services, Inc. We have reviewed the parties' briefs, the joint appendix, and the supplemental joint appendix and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Slevin v. Wachovia Ins. Servs., Inc., No. CA-04-1565-1-WDQ (D.Md. Dec. 21, 2004). We grant Slevin's motion to file an attachment to his reply brief and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED