Case Name: Harry Randall, Appellant, v. Hugo C. Schultz et al., Defendants. Bertha M. E. Kuehn, Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1909-06-18
Citations: 195 N.Y. 617
Docket Number: 
Parties: Harry Randall, Appellant, v. Hugo C. Schultz et al., Defendants. Bertha M. E. Kuehn, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 195
Pages: 617–617

Head Matter:
Harry Randall, Appellant, v. Hugo C. Schultz et al., Defendants. Bertha M. E. Kuehn, Respondent.
Randall v. Schultz, 129 App. Div. 925, appeal dismissed.
(Submitted May 2, 1909;
decided June 18, 1909.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered January 13, 1909, which affirmed an order of Special Term directing the cancellation of a notice of lis pendens.
Uriah W. Tompkins for appellant.
Robert 8. Kristeller for respondent.

Opinion:
Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Cli. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Werner and Hiscock, JJ.