Case Name: DISALVO PROPERTIES, LLC, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Deborah B. PURVIS; Elizabeth E. Nolan; NIS Construction Services, LLC; and Jennings Station Crossing, LLC, Defendants, and Gary L. Hall; Bentley Investments of Nevada, LLC; and Penfields Business Centers, LLC, Defendants/Respondents
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2017-04-18
Citations: 516 S.W.3d 427
Docket Number: No. ED 105062
Parties: DISALVO PROPERTIES, LLC, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Deborah B. PURVIS; Elizabeth E. Nolan; NIS Construction Services, LLC; and Jennings Station Crossing, LLC, Defendants, and Gary L. Hall; Bentley Investments of Nevada, LLC; and Penfields Business Centers, LLC, Defendants/Respondents.
Judges: Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Colleen Dolan, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 516
Pages: 427–427

Head Matter:
DISALVO PROPERTIES, LLC, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Deborah B. PURVIS; Elizabeth E. Nolan; NIS Construction Services, LLC; and Jennings Station Crossing, LLC, Defendants, and Gary L. Hall; Bentley Investments of Nevada, LLC; and Penfields Business Centers, LLC, Defendants/Respondents.
No. ED 105062
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Filed: April 18, 2017
Steven W. Koslovsky, Clayton, MO, for PlaintiffAppellant
William M. Modrcin, Overland Park, KS, for Defendants/Respondents
Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Colleen Dolan, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
DiSalvo Properties, LLC appeals from the trial court's summary judgment entered in favor of Gary L. Hall; Bentley Investments of Nevada, LLC; and Pen-fields Business Centers, LLC (Respondents). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude Respondents are entitled to judgment as a matter of law on material facts to which there is no genuine dispute. ITT Commercial Fin. Corp. v. Mid-Am. Marine Supply Corp., 854 S.W.2d 371, 376 (Mo. banc 1993). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).