Case Name: Mary Welsh DeHARRIET, Dierdre DeHarriet, Patricia DeHarriet, Michaela DeHarriet, Appellants, v. Enrique PINEDO and Marcelo V. Fagalde, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1987-09-09
Citations: 511 So. 2d 1130
Docket Number: No. 87-0285
Parties: Mary Welsh DeHARRIET, Dierdre DeHarriet, Patricia DeHarriet, Michaela DeHarriet, Appellants, v. Enrique PINEDO and Marcelo V. Fagalde, Appellees.
Judges: HERSEY, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 511
Pages: 1130–1130

Head Matter:
Mary Welsh DeHARRIET, Dierdre DeHarriet, Patricia DeHarriet, Michaela DeHarriet, Appellants, v. Enrique PINEDO and Marcelo V. Fagalde, Appellees.
No. 87-0285.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Sept. 9, 1987.
Roger C. Lambert of Barnett & Alagia, Palm Beach, for appellants.
James C. Pilkey of Taylor, Brion, Buker & Greene, Miami, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Based on what was brought before this court, reversal is insupportable. As was said in Zimmerman v. Vinylgrain Industries of Jacksonville, Inc., 464 So.2d 1353, 1354 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), echoing North Shore Hospital, Inc. v. Barber, 143 So.2d 849, 853 (Fla.1962), "[i]f there is any reasonable doubt in the matter of vacating a default, it should be resolved in favor of granting the application and allowing the trial upon the merits." Accordingly, we affirm.
HERSEY, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.