Case Name: Gordon GISTIN et al., Appellants, v. LIMA LOCOMOTIVE WORKS, Inc., et al., Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1943-12-17
Citations: 139 F.2d 698
Docket Number: No. 9495
Parties: Gordon GISTIN et al., Appellants, v. LIMA LOCOMOTIVE WORKS, Inc., et al., Appellees.
Judges: Before HICKS, MARTIN, and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 139
Pages: 698–698

Head Matter:
Gordon GISTIN et al., Appellants, v. LIMA LOCOMOTIVE WORKS, Inc., et al., Appellees.
No. 9495.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Dec. 17, 1943.
Edward Lamb and Lowell Goerlich, both ’ of Toledo, Ohio, for appellants.
Wheeler, Bentley, Neville & Cory, of Lima, Ohio, Mulholland, Robie & McEwen, of Toledo, Ohio, and Joseph A. Padway and Robert A. Wilson, both of Washington, D. G, for appellees.
Before HICKS, MARTIN, and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This cause was heard upon the transcript of record, briefs, and arguments of counsel, which have been duly weighed.
Upon the principles elucidated by this court in Hilliker v. Grand Lodge, K. P. et al., 6 Cir., 112 F.2d 382, and Atwood et al. v. National Bank of Lima, 6 Cir., 115 F.2d 861, the decree of the District Court from which appeal has been taken is found correct, and accordingly is affirmed.