Case Name: Sorrow v. The State
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1926-03-03
Citations: 35 Ga. App. 201
Docket Number: 17006
Parties: Sorrow v. The State.
Judges: Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 35
Pages: 201–202

Head Matter:
17006.
Sorrow v. The State.
Decided March 3, 1926.

Opinion:
Broyles, C. J.
The motion for a new trial is based upon the usual general grounds only; the verdict is authorized by the evidence; and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial court, this court is without authority to interfere.
Judgment affirmed.
Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.
Berry T. Moseley, for plaintiff in error.
A. S. Slcelton, solicitor-general, contra.