Case Name: Tamas Premecz, Respondent, v. RJHWong, LLC, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2014-06-04
Citations: 118 A.D.3d 689
Docket Number: 
Parties: Tamas Premecz, Respondent, v RJHWong, LLC, Appellant.
Judges: Mastro, J.E, Skelos, Cohen and LaSalle, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 118
Pages: 689–690

Head Matter:
Tamas Premecz, Respondent, v RJHWong, LLC, Appellant.
[986 NYS2d 354]

Opinion:
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Pineda-Kirwan, J.), entered January 31, 2013, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
In support of its motion for summary judgment, the defendant failed to m&ke a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a mater of law (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 [1986]). Since the defendant failed to establish its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, it is not necessary to review the sufficiency of the plaintiffs opposition papers (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr, 64 NY2d 851 [1985]).
Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Mastro, J.E, Skelos, Cohen and LaSalle, JJ., concur.