Case Name: BENJAMIN WRIGHT, as Receiver, &c., Respondent, v. ELBERT NOSTRAND, et al., Appellants
Court: New York Superior Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1881-02-07
Citations: 15 Jones & S. 526
Docket Number: 
Parties: BENJAMIN WRIGHT, as Receiver, &c., Respondent, v. ELBERT NOSTRAND, et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Reports of cases argued and determined in the Superior Court of the city of New York
Volume: 47
Pages: 526–526

Head Matter:
BENJAMIN WRIGHT, as Receiver, &c., Respondent, v. ELBERT NOSTRAND, et al., Appellants.
Before Speir and Freedman, JJ.
Decided February 7, 1881.
Appeal by defendants from an order adjudging that plaintiff’s proceedings in this action are not stayed by the operation of a previous order, which required plaintiff to file either security for the. costs of this action, or the “written consents, duly proved and acknowledged,” of the judgment creditors represented by plaintiff as receiver, that this action be brought at their respective risks.
Thomas & Wilder, attorneys, and Edward P.Wilder, of counsel, for appellants.
Henry D. Betts, for respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The order appealed from must be affirmed, with costs.