Case Name: Mauro CAPURSO, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-11-21
Citations: 206 F. App'x 268
Docket Number: No. 06-1438
Parties: Mauro CAPURSO, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 206
Pages: 268–268

Head Matter:
Mauro CAPURSO, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 06-1438.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 6, 2006.
Decided: Nov. 21, 2006.
Ralph J. DiPietro, The Law Office of Ralph J. DiPietro, P.C., Hyattsville, Maryland, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, James A. Hunolt, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Mauro Capurso, a native and citizen of Venezuela, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("Board") denying his motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board's order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2006). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See Capurso v. Gonzales, No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ] (B.I.A. Mar. 15, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.