Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John E. Borg, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1985-04-22
Citations: 110 A.D.2d 844
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John E. Borg, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 110
Pages: 844–844

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John E. Borg, Appellant.

Opinion:
The hearing court properly determined that defendant and his wife had voluntarily consented to the searches (see, People v Gonzalez, 39 NY2d 122) and that defendant's statement to Investigator McKnight after defendant had invoked his right to counsel was admissible as a spontaneous statement (see, People v Rogers, 48 NY2d 167). We have considered defendant's other contentions and find them to be lacking in merit. Mollen, P. J., Titone, Thompson and Lawrence, JJ., concur.