Case Name: William VAN BUREN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-04-23
Citations: 72 S.W.3d 626
Docket Number: No. ED 79852
Parties: William VAN BUREN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J„ and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 72
Pages: 626–626

Head Matter:
William VAN BUREN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 79852.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
April 23, 2002.
Jennifer S. Walsh, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Joe A. Block, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for Respondent.
Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J„ and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
William Van Burén (Movant) appeals the judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035 without a hearing. Movant contends his guilty plea was involuntary because his plea counsel promised him that he would only serve five years before he was paroled. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's decision is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Civil Procedure Rule 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2002, unless otherwise indicated.