Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. James Rustin STEWART, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-05-12
Citations: 425 F. App'x 311
Docket Number: No. 10-40743
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. James Rustin STEWART, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 425
Pages: 311–312

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. James Rustin STEWART, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-40743
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
May 12, 2011.
James Eugene Peacock, Sr., Esq., U.S. Attorney’s Office, Beaumont, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Denise S. Benson, Esq., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Defender’s Office, Sherman, TX, Amy R. Blalock, Federal Defender’s Office, Tyler, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent James Rustin Stewart has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Stewart has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.