Case Name: Waymare BILLUPS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Theodis BECK; Boyd Bennett; Ernest Sutton, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-12-20
Citations: 53 F. App'x 276
Docket Number: No. 02-7430
Parties: Waymare BILLUPS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Theodis BECK; Boyd Bennett; Ernest Sutton, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 53
Pages: 276–277

Head Matter:
Waymare BILLUPS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Theodis BECK; Boyd Bennett; Ernest Sutton, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 02-7430.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 16, 2002.
Decided Dec. 20, 2002.
Waymare Billups, Appellant Pro Se.
Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Waymare Billups appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Billups v. Beck, No. CA 02-628-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Sept. 12, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.