Case Name: Braulio J. VINOLY and Gladys Vinoly, Appellants, v. Harold PETLUCK, Individually, and Property Professionals, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1987-02-17
Citations: 502 So. 2d 525
Docket Number: No. 86-1296
Parties: Braulio J. VINOLY and Gladys Vinoly, Appellants, v. Harold PETLUCK, Individually, and Property Professionals, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.
Judges: Before HUBBART, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 502
Pages: 525–525

Head Matter:
Braulio J. VINOLY and Gladys Vinoly, Appellants, v. Harold PETLUCK, Individually, and Property Professionals, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.
No. 86-1296.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb. 17, 1987.
Richard C. Carter, Miami, for appellants.
Floyd, Pearson, Richman, Greer, Weil, Zack & Brumbaugh and Scott J. Feder, Miami, for appellees.
Before HUBBART, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Because Troton, Inc., an entity separate from appellants, acquired the subject property, Troton's purchase did not affect appellants' agreement to pay appellees' commission for the 1973 sale of the property. We therefore affirm the trial court's Amended Final Judgment. See Ed Skoda Ford, Inc. v. P & P Paint & Body Shop, Inc., 277 So.2d 818 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 284 So.2d 395 (Fla.1973); Mease v. Warm Mineral Springs, Inc., 128 So.2d 174 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 132 So.2d 291 (Fla.1961); Marks v. Green, 122 So.2d 491 (Fla. 1st DCA 1960).
Affirmed.