Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Daniel VILLALOBOS-DELGADO, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-04-19
Citations: 177 F. App'x 507
Docket Number: No. 05-2501
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Daniel VILLALOBOS-DELGADO, Appellant.
Judges: Before MELLOY, FAGG, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 177
Pages: 507–508

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Daniel VILLALOBOS-DELGADO, Appellant.
No. 05-2501.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted April 18, 2006.
Decided April 19, 2006.
Robert Christopher Sigler, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Omaha, NE, for Appellee.
Daniel Villalobos-Delgado, Leavenworth, KS, pro se.
Jeffrey L. Thomas, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Omaha, NE, for Appellant.
Before MELLOY, FAGG, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Daniel Villalobos-Delgado appeals the 120-month prison sentence the district court imposed after Villalobos-Delgado pleaded guilty to a drug-conspiracy charge. On appeal, counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), in which counsel raises a challenge to the sentence imposed.
The sentencing challenge fails, because in his plea agreement Villalobos-Delgado specifically agreed to receive a sentence of 120 months imprisonment. See United States v. Nguyen, 46 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir.1995) (defendant who explicitly and voluntarily exposes himself to specific sentence may not challenge that punishment on appeal).
We have carefully reviewed the record in accordance with Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), and have found no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment, and we grant counsel leave to withdraw.
The Honorable Laurie Smith Camp, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.