Case Name: Lerner et al., Appellants, v. Heicklen et al.
Court: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1926-12-10
Citations: 89 Pa. Super. 234
Docket Number: Appeal No. 72
Parties: Lerner et al., Appellants, v. Heicklen et al.
Judges: Before Porter, P. J., Henderson, Trexler, Keeler, Linn and Cunningham, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania Superior Court Reports
Volume: 89
Pages: 234–237

Head Matter:
Lerner et al., Appellants, v. Heicklen et al.
Argued October 11,1926.
Before Porter, P. J., Henderson, Trexler, Keeler, Linn and Cunningham, JJ.
December 10, 1926.
Harry B. Bach, and with him II. Jerome Jaspan, for appellants.
The provisions in the lease do not exempt the landlord from injuries resulting from his negligence: Charlow v. Blankenship, L. R. A. 1917 D. 1149; Worthington v. Parker, 11 Daly (N. Y.) 545; Randolph v. Feist, 52 N. Y. 109; Second United Cities Realty Corp. v. Hare, 165 N. Y. Supp. 371; Moroder v. Fox, 155 Wisc. 503—143 N. W. 1040; Fera v. Child, 115 Mass. 32 Ruff Drug Co. v. Iowa Co., 15 A. L. R., 962; LeVette v. Hardman Est., 1917 B. L. R. A., 222.
Charles H. Qoren, and with him Nathmiel I. 8. Goldman, for appellees.
The contract was valid and relieved the lessors from all liability to their tenants: Rose v. Finance Company, 21 Dist. Reports 490.

Opinion:
Per Curiam,
The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of Pres> ^ ident Judge Audenried of the court below. x