Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Lawrence COPPAWAY, Appellant; Lawrence COPPAWAY, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1997-09-16
Citations: 954 S.W.2d 8
Docket Number: Nos. 68197, 71260
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Lawrence COPPAWAY, Appellant. Lawrence COPPAWAY, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before AHRENS, P.J., and CRANDALL and KAROHL, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 954
Pages: 8–9

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Lawrence COPPAWAY, Appellant. Lawrence COPPAWAY, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 68197, 71260.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Sept. 16, 1997.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 30,1997.
Rosalynn Koch, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jacqueline K. Hamra, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for Respondent.
Before AHRENS, P.J., and CRANDALL and KAROHL, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant-Movant appeals after conviction and sentencing on charge of murder first degree, Section 565.021.1 RSMo Cum.Supp. 1991 and denial of Rule 29.15 post conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing.
The evidence was sufficient to support submission of the charged crime. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).