Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Manuel RUBIO, AKA Primo, AKA Gordo, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-09-30
Citations: 333 F. App'x 283
Docket Number: No. 08-50344
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Juan Manuel RUBIO, AKA Primo, AKA Gordo, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: SILVERMAN, RAWLINSON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 333
Pages: 283–283

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Juan Manuel RUBIO, AKA Primo, AKA Gordo, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-50344.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 14, 2009.
Filed Sept. 30, 2009.
Jean-Claude Andre, Assistant U.S., Michael J. Raphael, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Davina T. Chen, Angel Navarro, Esquire, Assistant Federal Public Defenders, FPDCA — Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: SILVERMAN, RAWLINSON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Juan Manuel Rubio appeals from the 108-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), 846, and possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine and cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Rubio contends that the district court plainly violated his Fifth Amendment right against self-inerimination at sentencing by imposing supervised release conditions requiring him to both report to the probation office within 72 hours of reentry into the United States and to truthfully answer all questions asked by the probation officer. This contention is foreclosed by United States v. Abbouchi, 502 F.3d 850, 859 (9th Cir.2007).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.