Case Name: DYCK-O'NEAL, INC., Appellant, v. Clyde LARMAN, Appellee.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2018-03-14
Citations: 238 So. 3d 854
Docket Number: No. 4D17–317
Parties: DYCK-O'NEAL, INC., Appellant,
v.
Clyde LARMAN, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 238
Pages: 854–854

Head Matter:
DYCK-O'NEAL, INC., Appellant,
v.
Clyde LARMAN, Appellee.
No. 4D17-317
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
[March 14, 2018]
David M. Snyder of David M. Snyder, Tampa, and Susan B. Morrison of Law Offices of Susan B. Morrison, P.A., Tampa, for appellant.
Yanina Zilberman, Roy D. Oppenheim, Geoffrey E. Sherman and Jacquelyn Trask of Oppenheim & Pilelsky, Weston, for appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
For the reasons set forth in Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. v. McKenna , 198 So.3d 1038 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016), we similarly reverse the final order of dismissal in the instant case and remand with instructions to reinstate the complaint. See Cheng v. Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. , 199 So.3d 932 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).
We certify conflict with Higgins v. Dyck-O'Neal, Inc., 201 So.3d 157 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016), as we did in McKenna .
Reversed and remanded with instructions; conflict certified.
Taylor, May and Damoorgian, JJ., concur.