Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Edward L. MOODY, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2001-05-07
Citations: 43 S.W.3d 896
Docket Number: No. WD 58999
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Edward L. MOODY, Appellant.
Judges: Before THOMAS H. NEWTON, Presiding Judge, JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge, and RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 43
Pages: 896–896

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Edward L. MOODY, Appellant.
No. WD 58999.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
May 7, 2001.
Rosalynn Koch, Asst. Public Defender Office, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Andrea Mazza Follett, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before THOMAS H. NEWTON, Presiding Judge, JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge, and RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
Edward Moody appeals his conviction on an accomplice liability theory for first degree robbery and armed criminal action. In his sole point on appeal he contends that the evidence was insufficient to show that he acted with Mark Hall in committing the offense or aided or encouraged Mark Hall in committing the robbery. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no prec-edential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.