Case Name: ROBERTSON v. FLEITMAN et al.
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1899-01-05
Citations: 91 F. 1004
Docket Number: No. 6
Parties: ROBERTSON v. FLEITMAN et al.
Judges: Before WALLACE, LACOMBE, and SHIPMAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter
Volume: 91
Pages: 1004–1004

Head Matter:
ROBERTSON v. FLEITMAN et al.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
January 5, 1899.)
No. 6.
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Henry B. Platt, for plaintiff in error.
Byman Tremain, for defendants in error.
Before WALLACE, LACOMBE, and SHIPMAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The facts and the questions presented are substantially the same as in Robertson v. Edelhoff (decided herewith) 91 Fed. 642. The plaintiff in error further contends in this case that, as to four importations, the duty was not paid to get possession of the goods. As this point was not raised below, and is not included in the assignment of errors, it cannot be considered here. Judgment affirmed.