Case Name: Donna JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SMITH KLINE BEECHAM d/b/a Glaxo Smith Kline, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-11-28
Citations: 157 F. App'x 348
Docket Number: No. 05-2213
Parties: Donna JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SMITH KLINE BEECHAM d/b/a Glaxo Smith Kline, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Present: MINER, KATZMANN, and WESLEY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 157
Pages: 348–349

Head Matter:
Donna JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SMITH KLINE BEECHAM d/b/a Glaxo Smith Kline, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 05-2213.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Nov. 28, 2005.
Donna Jones, Clifton Park, NY, for Plaintiff-Appellant, pro se.
Beth L. Kaufman (David B. Gordon, on the brief), Schoeman, Updike & Kaufman, New York, NY, for Defendant-Appellee.
Present: MINER, KATZMANN, and WESLEY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
SUMMARY ORDER
ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court be and hereby is AFFIRMED.
Appellant Donna Jones, pro se, appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (McAvoy, J.) entered pursuant to an unreported Decision and Order dated April 27, 2005, denying appellant's motion for reconsideration of the judgment granting appellee's motion for summary judgment and also asks that we grant Jones's motion to submit new information regarding appellee's allegedly fraudulent business practices.
The parties' familiarity with the facts is assumed. For the reasons stated in the district court's thorough opinion, we AFFIRM the district court's denial of Jones's motion for reconsideration and DENY the pending motion, as the information is not relevant to this Court's analysis of the Rule 60(b) denial.
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.