Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Dominic LACASTRO, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-12-22
Citations: 982 S.W.2d 795
Docket Number: No. ED 73425
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Dominic LACASTRO, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, J., and MARY RHODES RUSSELL, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 982
Pages: 795–796

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Dominic LACASTRO, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 73425.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Dec. 22, 1998.
Amy M. Bartholow, Columbia, for appellant.
John Munson Morris III, Kevin F. Hen-nessey, Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, J., and MARY RHODES RUSSELL, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of driving while intoxicated in violation of section 577.010 RSMo 1994; operating a motor vehicle without a valid license in violation of section 302.020 RSMo (Supp.1995); improper passing on the right in violation of section 304.016 RSMo 1994; and failure to yield to an emergency vehicle in violation of section 304.022 RSMo (Supp.1995).
Defendant was sentenced, respectively, to five years imprisonment, fifteen days in jail and a $50 fine, fifteen days in jail, and a $100 fine. The trial court ordered the terms of confinement to run concurrently with each other and consecutively to a previously imposed prison term.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
. Defendant's name is spelled several different ways throughout the proceedings. We refer to defendant by the name on his Notice of Appeal.