Case Name: Yentis, Appellant, v. Mills
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1928-01-23
Citations: 291 Pa. 591
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 105
Parties: Yentis, Appellant, v. Mills.
Judges: Before Moschzisker, C. J., Frazer, Walling, Simpson, Kephart, Sadler and Schaefer, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 291
Pages: 591–592

Head Matter:
Yentis, Appellant, v. Mills.
Argued January 4, 1928.
Before Moschzisker, C. J., Frazer, Walling, Simpson, Kephart, Sadler and Schaefer, JJ.
January 23, 1928:
Charles L. Smyth, for appellant.
James C. Crumlish and Hamilton C. Connor, for appellee, were not heard.

Opinion:
Per Curiam,
The court below refuged to enter judgment in favor of plaintiff for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense and this appeal followed. We have repeatedly said that the record must clearly show plain error of law before we will sustain such an appeal (Federal Sales Co. v. Farrell, 264 Pa. 149, 153; Goodrich Rubber Co. v. Motor Tire Corporation, 291 Pa. 185), and this is not a case of that kind.
The order of the court below is affirmed.