Case Name: David Rouss, Respondent, v. Harry Grossman, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1921-12
Citations: 199 A.D. 966
Docket Number: 
Parties: David Rouss, Respondent, v. Harry Grossman, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 199
Pages: 966–966

Head Matter:
David Rouss, Respondent, v. Harry Grossman, Appellant.

Opinion:
Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event, on the ground that an issue of fact was presented which should have been submitted to the jury, as requested by defendant's counsel at the close of the case, as to whether or not the plaintiff was the holder in due course for value of the check in question. Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Page and Merrell, JJ.