Case Name: The State ex rel. Hart, Appellant, v. Turner, Warden, Appellee
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2012-07-24
Citations: 132 Ohio St. 3d 479
Docket Number: No. 2012-0396
Parties: The State ex rel. Hart, Appellant, v. Turner, Warden, Appellee.
Judges: O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 132
Pages: 479–480

Head Matter:
The State ex rel. Hart, Appellant, v. Turner, Warden, Appellee.
[Cite as State ex rel. Hart v. Turner, 132 Ohio St.3d 479, 2012-Ohio-3305.]
(No. 2012-0396
Submitted July 11, 2012
Decided July 24, 2012.)

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, David Hart, for a writ of habeas corpus. Hart's speedy-trial claim is not cognizable in habeas corpus, and he had an adequate remedy by appeal from his sentencing entry to raise his claim. Tisdale v. Eberlin, 114 Ohio St.3d 201, 2007-Ohio-3833, 870 N.E.2d 1191, ¶ 7; Boles v. Knob, 130 Ohio St.3d 339, 2011-Ohio-5049, 958 N.E.2d 554, ¶ 1. Hart also waived the additional claims he raises on appeal — ineffective assistance of counsel and denial of his rights to due process and equal protection — because he failed to raise them in the court of appeals. State ex rel. Compton v. Sutula, 132 Ohio St.3d 35, 2012-Ohio-1653, 968 N.E.2d 476, ¶ 4. In addition, these claims are also not cognizable in habeas corpus, and Hart had an adequate remedy by appeal to raise them. See, e.g., Everett v. Eberlin, 114 Ohio St.3d 199, 2007-Ohio-3832, 870 N.E.2d 1190, ¶ 6 (ineffective assistance of counsel); Austin v. Sacks, 172 Ohio St. 292, 175 N.E.2d 175 (1961) (due process).
David Hart, pro se.
Michael DeWine, Attorney General, and Jerri L. Fosnaught, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee, Neil Turner.
Judgment affirmed.
O'Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.