Case Name: Albert WIDMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Visuambhara WIDMER, Plaintiff, v. WITTMAN, Sheriff of Tulare County; S. Logue, Detective; Cotton, Detective; Cleek, Detective; Renteria, Detective; Gordon McClaskey, Parole Officer; County of Tulare; Chester Trow, Attorney; Richard Jumpp; Eleanor Noble; Roy Graves, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-03-29
Citations: 6 F. App'x 648
Docket Number: No. 99-16111; D.C. No. CV-98-05434-AWI/DLB
Parties: Albert WIDMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Visuambhara WIDMER, Plaintiff, v. WITTMAN, Sheriff of Tulare County; S. Logue, Detective; Cotton, Detective; Cleek, Detective; Renteria, Detective; Gordon McClaskey, Parole Officer; County of Tulare; Chester Trow, Attorney; Richard Jumpp; Eleanor Noble; Roy Graves, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before LEAVY, THOMAS, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 6
Pages: 648–649

Head Matter:
Albert WIDMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Visuambhara WIDMER, Plaintiff, v. WITTMAN, Sheriff of Tulare County; S. Logue, Detective; Cotton, Detective; Cleek, Detective; Renteria, Detective; Gordon McClaskey, Parole Officer; County of Tulare; Chester Trow, Attorney; Richard Jumpp; Eleanor Noble; Roy Graves, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 99-16111. D.C. No. CV-98-05434-AWI/DLB.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 12, 2001 .
Decided March 29, 2001.
Before LEAVY, THOMAS, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Albert Widmer, a Florida state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his action as duplicative of a then pending action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. See Cato v. United States, 70 F.3d 1103, 1105 n. 2 (9th Cir.1995).
AFFIRMED.
. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.