Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Michael Wiley, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2000-09-29
Citations: 275 A.D.2d 1020
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Wiley, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 275
Pages: 1020–1020

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Wiley, Appellant.
[714 NYS2d 914]

Opinion:
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: After Supreme Court concluded its charge but before the jury began deliberating, the prosecutor requested a further charge on the permissible inference that may be drawn from the recent, exclusive and unexplained possession of the fruits of a burglary (see, 1 CJI[NY] 9.80, at 562). We reject defendant's contentions that the court erred in giving that charge absent a request by the jury for additional instructions (see, CPL 300.10 [5]) and that the further charge was improper (see, People v Durgey, 186 AD2d 899, 902, lv denied 81 NY2d 788). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Wisner, J. — Burglary, 3rd Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Hayes, Hurlbutt and Kehoe, JJ.