Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Carlos Enrique SAMAYOA-PINEDA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-02-23
Citations: 678 F. App'x 194
Docket Number: No. 15-50671 Summary Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Carlos Enrique SAMAYOA-PINEDA, Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. .
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 678
Pages: 194–194

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Carlos Enrique SAMAYOA-PINEDA, Defendant-Appellant
No. 15-50671 Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed February 23, 2017
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of' Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Carlos Enrique Samayoa-Pineda, Pro Se
Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. .

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Carlos Enrique Samayoa-Pineda again has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Sa-mayoa-Pineda has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Samayoa-Pineda's response. Regardless of several nonfrivolous issues we previously identified, it is dispositive that the Government has declined to waive the untimeliness of the appeal. See United States v. Pesina-Rodriguez, 825 F.3d 787, 788 (5th Cir. 2016). Therefore, without prejudice to a future 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion that Samayoa-Pineda may file, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.