Case Name: Melvin B. WELLS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Clark RAY, City of Norfolk, Neighborhood Preservation, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-12-14
Citations: 115 F. App'x 136
Docket Number: No. 04-1977
Parties: Melvin B. WELLS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Clark RAY, City of Norfolk, Neighborhood Preservation, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 115
Pages: 136–136

Head Matter:
Melvin B. WELLS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Clark RAY, City of Norfolk, Neighborhood Preservation, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 04-1977.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 9, 2004.
Decided Dec. 14, 2004.
Melvin B. Wells, Jr., Appellant pro se. Harold Phillip Juren, Deputy City Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Melvin B. Wells, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Wells v. Ray, No. CA-04-219-2 (E.D. Va. filed July 6, 2004 & entered July 7, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED