Case Name: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. ABELARDO CASTRO FUENTES, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2005-06-22
Citations: 200 Or. App. 385
Docket Number: 99C-56344; A121506
Parties: STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. ABELARDO CASTRO FUENTES, Appellant.
Judges: Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Brewer, Chief Judge, and Armstrong, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 200
Pages: 385–386

Head Matter:
Submitted on record and briefs May 23,
sentence vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed June 22,2005
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. ABELARDO CASTRO FUENTES, Appellant.
99C-56344; A121506
114 P3d 542
Peter A. Ozanne, Executive Director, Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, and Susan F. Drake, Senior Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Christina M. Hutchins, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Brewer, Chief Judge, and Armstrong, Judge.
PER CURIAM
Brewer, C. J., vice Ceniceros, S. J.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Defendant was convicted of felony assault in the fourth degree and interfering with making a report. The trial court imposed a durational departure sentence based on findings of persistent involvement in similar offenses and a "total disregard for the law." On appeal, defendant argues that the sentence is unlawful because it is based on facts not admitted or found by a jury, in violation of Blakely v. Washington, 542 US 296, 124 S Ct 2531, 159 L Ed 2d 403 (2004). The state concedes that, in light of our decision in State v. Perez, 196 Or App 364, 102 P3d 705 (2004), rev allowed, 338 Or 488 (2005), defendant is correct. We accept the concession.
Sentence vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.