Case Name: Arthur W. Caziarc, Respondent, v. Abram French Company, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1895-12-27
Citations: 98 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 641
Docket Number: 
Parties: Arthur W. Caziarc, Respondent, v. Abram French Company, Appellant.
Judges: All concur.
Reporter: Supreme Court Reports (Hun)
Volume: 98
Pages: 641–641

Head Matter:
Arthur W. Caziarc, Respondent, v. Abram French Company, Appellant.

Opinion:
Order modified by striking out the name of the person in whose presence the plaintiff was seen intoxicated, and, so modified, affirmed, without costs.—
Pratt, J.:
This is an appeal from an order requiring the defendant to serve a verified bill of particulars of the matter set up in the answer. In addition to a general denial, the defendant has set up in what way he claims the plaintiff has broken the contract of employment, and it is only fair the plaintiff should be apprised of the time ana place, when and where, the occasions took place upon which he intends to offer proof. He will not be required to disclose his evidence or the names of his witnesses. The order went too far in requiring the defendant to state the names of the persons in whose presence the plaintiff was intoxicated; with the modification of striking out that part of the order, the order appealed from is affirmed, without costs to either party.
All concur.