Case Name: Walter Dunwoody et al., respondents, v. Julius Goldfarb et al., appellants
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1932-02-01
Citations: 110 N.J. Eq. 65
Docket Number: 
Parties: Walter Dunwoody et al., respondents, v. Julius Goldfarb et al., appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 110
Pages: 65–65

Head Matter:
Walter Dunwoody et al., respondents, v. Julius Goldfarb et al., appellants.
[Decided February 1st, 1932.]
Messrs. Huchin & Huchin, for the respondents.
Messrs. Gross & Gross, for the appellants.

Opinion:
Pee Cubiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis, and reported in 107 N. J. Eq. 270.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Teenchaed, Paekee, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Daly, Donges, Van Buskiek, Kays, Heteield, Deae, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.