Case Name: N. Norman Muller et al., Respondents, v. Want & Ender, CPA, P.C., et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2008-10-14
Citations: 55 A.D.3d 696
Docket Number: 
Parties: N. Norman Muller et al., Respondents, v Want & Ender, CPA, P.C., et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 55
Pages: 696–697

Head Matter:
N. Norman Muller et al., Respondents, v Want & Ender, CPA, P.C., et al., Appellants.
[866 NYS2d 262]

Opinion:
an action to recover damages for accounting malpractice and fraud, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Galasso, J.), dated September 13, 2007, as denied that branch of their cross motion which was to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CFLR 3215 (c) as abandoned, based on the plaintiffs' failure to seek a default judgment within one year.
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with costs, and that branch of the defendant's cross motion which was to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CFLR 3215 (c) is granted.
To avoid dismissal of the complaint as abandoned pursuant to CFLR 3215 (c), the plaintiffs were required to offer a reasonable excuse for their delay in seeking a default judgment and demonstrate that the complaint was meritorious (see Costello v Reilly, 36 AD3d 581 [2007]; Gleason v Gottlieb, 35 AD3d 355 [2006]). Here, the plaintiffs failed to set forth a reasonable excuse for the three-year delay in seeking a default judgment. Accordingly, the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the defendants' cross mo tion which was to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3215 (c). Skelos, J.E, Ritter, Dillon, Garni and Leventhal, JJ., concur.