Case Name: In re Scott E. LUELLEN, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-02-02
Citations: 463 F. App'x 177
Docket Number: No. 11-1992
Parties: In re Scott E. LUELLEN, Petitioner.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 463
Pages: 177–178

Head Matter:
In re Scott E. LUELLEN, Petitioner.
No. 11-1992.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 31, 2012.
Decided: Feb. 2, 2012.
Scott E. Luellen, Petitioner pro se.
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Scott E. Luellen petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C.A § 2255 (West Supp.2011) motion. The district court has now ruled on Luellen's § 2255 motion. Thus, we find that Luel-len's petition alleging delay is moot. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We grant Luellen's motions to file an oversize brief and to proceed in forma pauper-is, and deny his motions for a transcript at Government expense, for a certifícate of appealability, to amend/correct his mandamus petition, and to clarify. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.