Case Name: Hadi BARAKAT d/b/a Barakat Food Store, Appellant, v. FLORIDA OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION, Appellee.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2019-02-11
Citations: 263 So. 3d 293
Docket Number: No. 1D17-3637
Parties: Hadi BARAKAT d/b/a Barakat Food Store, Appellant,
v.
FLORIDA OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 263
Pages: 293–294

Head Matter:
Hadi BARAKAT d/b/a Barakat Food Store, Appellant,
v.
FLORIDA OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION, Appellee.
No. 1D17-3637
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
February 11, 2019
Michael T. King, Neptune Beach, for Appellant.
Anthony Cammarata and Miriam S. Wilkinson A.G.C., Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Hadi Barakat appeals the Office of Financial Regulations's denial of his request to contest a final order entered against him as the proprietor of a convenience store that is alleged to have engaged in transactions violating Florida check cashing laws. He claims he was out of the country and that the OFR's service of its complaint against him on a shopkeeper and at his parent's home was ineffectual; the OFR counters that service was proper as to both (Barakat had listed his parent's home as an official address) and that Barakat's affidavit is not credible. Under these circumstances, where the OFR has served notice of the complaint in facially valid ways and Barakat claims that notice was invalid based on disputed facts, a limited remand is necessary to adjudge the matter. See Avante, Inc. v. Agency for Health Care Admin. , 722 So.2d 965 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) ; Symons v. State, Dep't of Banking and Fin. , 490 So.2d 1322 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) ; Brown v. State, Dep't of Fin. Servs. , 899 So.2d 1246 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005).
REVERSED and REMANDED .
Lewis, Makar, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.