Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tyrone Eugene YATES, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-06-05
Citations: 473 F. App'x 186
Docket Number: No. 11-7638
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tyrone Eugene YATES, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 473
Pages: 186–186

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tyrone Eugene YATES, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-7638.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 31, 2012.
Decided: June 5, 2012.
Tyrone Eugene Yates, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorneys, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Tyrone Eugene Yates appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. United States v. Yates, 3:06-cr-00020-JPB-JSK-1 (N.D.W.Va. Nov. 21, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.