Case Name: In the Matter of Susan Wright, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. SUSAN WRIGHT, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2006-07-05
Citations: 206 Or. App. 711
Docket Number: 0506-66075; A128910
Parties: In the Matter of Susan Wright, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. SUSAN WRIGHT, Appellant.
Judges: Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Armstrong and Rosenblum, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 206
Pages: 711–712

Head Matter:
Submitted on record and briefs June 2,
reversed July 5, 2006
In the Matter of Susan Wright, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. SUSAN WRIGHT, Appellant.
0506-66075; A128910
138 P3d 899
Daniel J. Casey filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Laura S. Anderson, Senior Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Armstrong and Rosenblum, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Appellant in this mental commitment case appeals a judgment committing her to the Mental Health Division for treatment for a period of time not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. The trial court found that appellant suffers from a mental disorder, is unable to provide for her basic personal needs, and is a danger to herself. A discussion of the facts would be of no benefit to the bench and bar. The state concedes that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence that appellant is unable to provide for her basic personal needs or is a danger to herself. We find the state's concession to be well founded and therefore accept it.
Reversed.