Case Name: Miguel SIGLER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1989-09-19
Citations: 548 So. 2d 897
Docket Number: No. 89-120
Parties: Miguel SIGLER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 548
Pages: 897–897

Head Matter:
Miguel SIGLER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 89-120.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Sept. 19, 1989.
Scott W. Sakin, North Miami Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Giselle D. Lylen, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
There is no reversible error in the trafficking and possession convictions under review. We find, however, that the evidence is insufficient to support the separate conspiracy charge, see Velunza v. State, 504 So.2d 780 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), and cases cited, and this conviction is therefore set aside.
Affirmed as modified.