Case Name: QUEEN v. NEALE
Court: United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1810-06
Citations: 20 F. Cas. 130
Docket Number: 
Parties: QUEEN v. NEALE.
Judges: (THRUSTON, Circuit Judge, absent).
Reporter: Federal Cases
Volume: 20
Pages: 130–130

Head Matter:
Case No. 11,604.
QUEEN v. NEALE.
[2 Cranch, C. C. 3.]
Circuit Court, District of Columbia.
June Term, 1810.
Evidence — Declakations or Ancestok While Held as Slave — Declarations as to Fkebdom.
1. The declarations of an ancestor, while held as a slave, cannot be given in evidence.^
2. Declarations of deceased persons, that the ancestor was free, may be given in evidence, to show that the ancestor was in fact free, that is, not held in slavery.
[This was an action by Priscilla Queen, a negress, against Francis Neale.]
Petition for freedom.' The declaration of the ancestor, while held as a slave, cannot be given in evidence, to prove that the ancestor came from England.
Mr. Law, for defendant,
contended that it was not evidence, because it was a mere opinion as to a question of right.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
(THRUSTON, Circuit Judge, absent).
A witness, in his deposition, stated that he heard a deceased person say that the ancestor was free.
But
THE COURT
(THRUSTON, Circuit Judge, absent) permitted it to be read to the jttry, as evidence that she was in fact free, that is, that she was not actually holden in slavery.
THE COURT
(FITZHUGH, Circuit Judge, absent)
refused to instruct the jury that Ji-am's declarations, that the ancestor was a free woman, and sold only for seven years, were incompetent to prove the petitioner's title to freedom; and instructed the jury that those declarations were admissible evidence, to prove that she was a free woman.