Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mario Arnulfo MENDOZA-MENDOZA, also known as Mario Mendez-Rodriguez, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-06-06
Citations: 229 F. App'x 357
Docket Number: No. 06-51207
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mario Arnulfo MENDOZA-MENDOZA, also known as Mario Mendez-Rodriguez, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 229
Pages: 357–358

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mario Arnulfo MENDOZA-MENDOZA, also known as Mario Mendez-Rodriguez, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-51207
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
June 6, 2007.
Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Mario Arnulfo Mendoza-Mendoza raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.