Case Name: Connecticut Valley Construction Co., Inc. v. State of New Hampshire
Court: New Hampshire Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Hampshire
Decision Date: 1975-05-30
Citations: 115 N.H. 247
Docket Number: No. 6838
Parties: Connecticut Valley Construction Co., Inc. v. State of New Hampshire
Judges: 
Reporter: New Hampshire Reports
Volume: 115
Pages: 247–247

Head Matter:
Merrimack
No. 6838
Connecticut Valley Construction Co., Inc. v. State of New Hampshire
May 30, 1975
Connecticut Valley Construction Co., Inc., filed no brief.
Warren B. Rudrnan, attorney general, and Michael P. Bentley, assistant attorney general, by brief, for the defendant.

Opinion:
Memorandum Opinion
After the case was docketed in this court, and pursuant to rules 6 and 7 of (he court (RSA 490:App. Rules 6, 7 (Supp. 1973)), four different time limits were set for the filing of a brief in behalf of plaintiff, and an even greater number of continuances of oral argument were allowed. No brief was filed within those time limits. On February 28, 1975, the clerk notified plaintiff that the case would be submitted to the court on March 25, 1975, on the State's brief and without oral argument, and that plaintiff could file a brief before March 25, 1975. No brief and no communication from or on behalf of plaintiff was received.
On the basis of the history of the case in this court, and following an examination of the record, including the transcript and the master's report, we think the rationale and the holding in McNamara v. MacCormac, 113 N.H. 540, 309 A.2d 916 (1973), is controlling. For plaintiff's failure to file a brief in compliance with RSA 490:13. (Supp. 1973), the order in this case is
Plaintiff's exceptions overruled; judgment on the verdict.