Case Name: James Daniel MORGAN, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1965-01-06
Citations: 340 F.2d 125
Docket Number: No. 19479
Parties: James Daniel MORGAN, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 340
Pages: 125–126

Head Matter:
James Daniel MORGAN, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 19479.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
Jan. 6, 1965.
Donald Jay Solomon, San Diego, Cal., for appellant.
Manuel L. Real, U. S. Atty., John K. Van de Kamp, Asst. U. S. Atty., Chief, Criminal Sec., Phillip W. Johnson, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Before JERTBERG and BROWNING, Circuit Judges, and FOLEY, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant's sole contention on this appeal is that the heroin which was received in evidence should have been excluded on the ground that it is a product of an illegal search and seizure. We hold to the contrary. See Blackford v. U. S., 247 F.2d 745 (9th Cir. 1957) C.D., 356 U.S. 914, 78 S.Ct. 672, 2 L.Ed.2d 586.
The Judgment of conviction is affirmed.