Case Name: In the Matter of Mark Hughes, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MARK HUGHES, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2000-05-03
Citations: 167 Or. App. 158
Docket Number: C980111MC; CA A103826
Parties: In the Matter of Mark Hughes, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MARK HUGHES, Appellant.
Judges: Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Linder and Brewer, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 167
Pages: 158–159

Head Matter:
Submitted on record and briefs February 4,
reversed and remanded for further proceedings May 3, 2000
In the Matter of Mark Hughes, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. MARK HUGHES, Appellant.
(C980111MC; CA A103826)
999 P2d 1215
Susan D. Isaacs filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General, and Philip Schradle, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Linder and Brewer, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Appellant, an alleged mentally ill person, appeals an order of civil commitment. He argues that the trial court erred in failing to advise him of his statutory rights as required by ORS 426.100(1). The state concedes that the trial court failed to provide the advice that the statute requires. We accept the state's concession.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.