Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Andrew Charles JACKSON, a/k/a William Benbow, a/k/a Ricky Antonio Bady, a/k/a Sway, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-04-25
Citations: 646 F. App'x 336
Docket Number: No. 15-7813
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Andrew Charles JACKSON, a/k/a William Benbow, a/k/a Ricky Antonio Bady, a/k/a Sway, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 646
Pages: 336–336

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Andrew Charles JACKSON, a/k/a William Benbow, a/k/a Ricky Antonio Bady, a/k/a Sway, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-7813.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 21, 2016.
Decided: April 25, 2016.
Andrew Charles Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Andrew Charles Jackson appeals the district court's order denying his "Petition for Discovery of Voir Dire Examination Habeas Corpus § 121 Evidentiary Hearing." We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Jackson, Nos. 3:00-cr-00006-JPB-RWT-1; 3:00-cr-00046-JPB-RWT-1 (N.D.W.Va. Oct. 14, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.