Case Name: Westchester Trust Company, Appellant, v. Augusta Rosenwasser and Others, Defendants; Morris L. Rosenwasser, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1936-10-16
Citations: 248 A.D. 895
Docket Number: 
Parties: Westchester Trust Company, Appellant, v. Augusta Rosenwasser and Others, Defendants; Morris L. Rosenwasser, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 248
Pages: 895–895

Head Matter:
Westchester Trust Company, Appellant, v. Augusta Rosenwasser and Others, Defendants; Morris L. Rosenwasser, Respondent.

Opinion:
In an action to recover on two promissory notes, order, in so far as it denies plaintiff's motion to strike out the answer of defendant Morris L. Rosenwasser and to grant summary judgment pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, as against him, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. It was conceded on the argument that the bank was closed on the day it was alleged that the notice was sent. This has a bearing on whether or not it was in fact sent. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.