Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pete SMITH, a/k/a Pete Noble Muhammad, a/k/a Jose, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-04-08
Citations: 92 F. App'x 51
Docket Number: No. 03-7765
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pete SMITH, a/k/a Pete Noble Muhammad, a/k/a Jose, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 92
Pages: 51–51

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pete SMITH, a/k/a Pete Noble Muhammad, a/k/a Jose, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 03-7765.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 15, 2004.
Decided: April 8, 2004.
Pete Smith, Appellant pro se.
Anna Mills Wagoner, United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Pete Smith appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying his motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Smith, Nos. CR-93-117; CA-03-155 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 28, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED