Case Name: George W. STRICKLAND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2004-12-22
Citations: 889 So. 2d 219
Docket Number: No. 2D03-2972
Parties: George W. STRICKLAND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SALCINES and SILBERMAN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 889
Pages: 219–220

Head Matter:
George W. STRICKLAND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D03-2972.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Dec. 22, 2004.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Celene Humphries, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Katherine Coombs Cline, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

Opinion:
WHATLEY, Judge.
George W. Strickland appeals his convictions for first-degree murder and armed burglary, and he challenges the imposition of a discretionary cost. We affirm Strickland's convictions without opinion and reverse the imposition of the $150 cost.
Strickland argues, and the State properly concedes, that the portion of the sentence requiring Strickland to pay $150 pursuant to section 939.18(1), Florida Statutes (2003), must be reversed. "Section 939.18(l)(b) allows the trial court to impose this discretionary cost if it finds that the person has the ability to pay the cost, and payment of the cost will not interfere with the person's ability to pay child support and restitution." Patterson v. State, 796 So.2d 572, 574 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). The trial court failed to make these findings, and therefore, the cost must be reversed.
Accordingly, we affirm Strickland's convictions and sentences, reverse the portion of the sentence imposing the above cost, and remand to strike this cost from the sentence. The trial court may again impose this cost after complying with section 939.18(l)(b).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
SALCINES and SILBERMAN, JJ., concur.