Case Name: Phyllis Holly et al., Respondents, v. Richard O. Richtberg et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1993-12-13
Citations: 199 A.D.2d 307
Docket Number: 
Parties: Phyllis Holly et al., Respondents, v Richard O. Richtberg et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 199
Pages: 307–308

Head Matter:
Phyllis Holly et al., Respondents, v Richard O. Richtberg et al., Appellants.
[606 NYS2d 1007]

Opinion:
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Floyd, J.), en tered November 1, 1991, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiffs have raised triable issues of fact (see, CPLR 3212) as to whether the offending instrumentality was situated on the property owned by the defendants. Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Lawrence and Joy, JJ., concur.