Case Name: Nathan PRINCE, Petitioner, v. Kenny SWEEDLER, and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1964-07-17
Citations: 166 So. 2d 437
Docket Number: No. 33471
Parties: Nathan PRINCE, Petitioner, v. Kenny SWEEDLER, and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
Judges: DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 166
Pages: 437–438

Head Matter:
Nathan PRINCE, Petitioner, v. Kenny SWEEDLER, and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
No. 33471.
Supreme Court of Florida.
July 17, 1964.
Kastenbaum, Mamber, Gopman & Epstein, Miami Beach, for petitioner.
Preddy & Haddad, Miami, for Kenny Sweedler; Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for Florida Industrial Commission, respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date August 7, 1963.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.
DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.