Case Name: John D. HORTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R.L. BROWNLEE, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-08-31
Citations: 142 F. App'x 190
Docket Number: No. 05-1649
Parties: John D. HORTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R.L. BROWNLEE, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before TRAXLER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 142
Pages: 190–190

Head Matter:
John D. HORTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R.L. BROWNLEE, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 05-1649.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 25, 2005.
Decided: Aug. 31, 2005.
John D. Horton, Appellant Pro Se. Lora M. Taylor, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before TRAXLER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
John D. Horton appeals the district court's order dismissing his employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Horton v. Brownlee, No. CA-04-610-5 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 27, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED