Case Name: Edwin S. ZARR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2006-01-25
Citations: 920 So. 2d 125
Docket Number: No. 3D05-2489
Parties: Edwin S. ZARR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before CORTINAS and ROTHENBERG, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 920
Pages: 125–125

Head Matter:
Edwin S. ZARR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D05-2489.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan. 25, 2006.
Edwin S. Zarr, in proper person.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, for appellee.
Before CORTINAS and ROTHENBERG, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
ROTHENBERG, Judge.
The petitioner, Edwin Zarr, seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to rule on a motion he filed on or about March 3, 2005. As the motion was sent to the clerk of the circuit court, but apparently was not forwarded to the trial court, and the petitioner failed to send a copy of his petition directly to the trial court, we conclude that mandamus would be inappropriate. The trial court now has a copy of the petitioner's motion, and we feel confident that it will be ruled on in a timely fashion.
Petition denied.