Case Name: Rock JORDAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY, VIRGINIA, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-06-03
Citations: 326 F. App'x 243
Docket Number: No. 08-1987
Parties: Rock JORDAN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY, VIRGINIA, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 326
Pages: 243–244

Head Matter:
Rock JORDAN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY, VIRGINIA, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 08-1987.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 20, 2009.
Decided: June 3, 2009.
Alan S. Shachter, Manassas, Virginia, for Appellant. Ross G. Horton, County Attorney, Megan E. Kelly, Assistant County Attorney, Prince William, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Rock Jordan appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to the County of Prince William, Virginia, and denying summary judgment to Jordan on Jordan's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint alleging due process viqlations in conjunction with his termination from employment with the County of Prince William.
Finding the County's pre-termination and post-termination hearing procedures satisfied due process requirements in light of Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 105 S.Ct. 1487, 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985), and Linton v. Frederick County Bd. of County Comm'rs, 964 F.2d 1436 (4th Cir.1992), we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jordan v. Prince William County, Virginia, No. 1:08-cv-00089-LO-TRJ (E.D.Va. July 7, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.