Case Name: Jeff KING, Employee/Respondent, v. BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTRIES, Employer/Appellant, and Custard Claims Management, Insurer/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-11-30
Citations: 7 S.W.3d 569
Docket Number: No. ED 76004
Parties: Jeff KING, Employee/Respondent, v. BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTRIES, Employer/Appellant, and Custard Claims Management, Insurer/Appellant.
Judges: Before LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, P.J., JAMES R. DOWD, J. and CHARLES B. BLACKMAR, Senior Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 7
Pages: 569–570

Head Matter:
Jeff KING, Employee/Respondent, v. BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTRIES, Employer/Appellant, and Custard Claims Management, Insurer/Appellant.
No. ED 76004.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Nov. 30, 1999.
Kevin M. Leahy, Robyn G. Fox, Catherine M. Vale, St. Louis, for appellant.
Robert J. Keefe, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, P.J., JAMES R. DOWD, J. and CHARLES B. BLACKMAR, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Browning Ferris Industries ("Employer") appeals the Decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission awarding compensation to Jeff King ("Employee") based on a finding he sustained an acciden tal injury arising out of and in the course of his employment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. An extended opinion would be of no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).