Case Name: CITY DISCOUNT COSMETICS & APPLIANCES, INC. and Parliament Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Ana ASPURU, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1981-11-03
Citations: 405 So. 2d 494
Docket Number: No. 81-316
Parties: CITY DISCOUNT COSMETICS & APPLIANCES, INC. and Parliament Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Ana ASPURU, Appellee.
Judges: Before DANIEL S. PEARSON, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 405
Pages: 494–495

Head Matter:
CITY DISCOUNT COSMETICS & APPLIANCES, INC. and Parliament Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Ana ASPURU, Appellee.
No. 81-316.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 3, 1981.
Jesse W. Miller, Hialeah, for appellants.
Lopez & Saldise, Ann Mason Parker, Miami, for appellee.
Before DANIEL S. PEARSON, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Guenther, 395 So.2d 244 (Fla.3d DCA 1981) (evidence viewed most favorably for appel-lee shows appellant had constructive notice and establishes prima facie case); Food Fair Stores of Florida v. Vallarelli, 101 So.2d 161 (Fla.3d DCA 1958), cert. denied, 104 So.2d 595 (Fla.1958) (sufficient evidence to submit question of knowledge of dangerous condition to jury; appellate court will not substitute its judgment for that of jury)-