Case Name: Walton v. Small Business Administration; Williams v. Pierce, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, et al.; Betka v. City of West Linn et al.; Kajevic v. United States; McMillan v. Hester et al.; Morvay v. Maghielse Tool & Die Co., Inc.; Brown v. Rice et al., In re Brown, Skaggs et al. v. Crawford County, Ohio, et al.; Howell v. Appling
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1984-02-21
Citations: 465 U.S. 1055
Docket Number: No. 83-709; No. 83-5448; No. 83-5460; No. 83-5536; No. 83-5572; No. 83-5624; No. 83-5633; No. 83-5634; No. 83-5638; No. 83-5793
Parties: Walton v. Small Business Administration, Williams v. Pierce, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, et al., Betka v. City of West Linn et al., Kajevic v. United States, McMillan v. Hester et al., Morvay v. Maghielse Tool & Die Co., Inc., Brown v. Rice et al., In re Brown, Skaggs et al. v. Crawford County, Ohio, et al., Howell v. Appling,
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 465
Pages: 1055–1055

Head Matter:
No. 83-709.
No. 83-5448.
No. 83-5460.
No. 83-5536.
No. 83-5572.
No. 83-5624.
No. 83-5633.
No. 83-5634.
No. 83-5638.
No. 83-5793.
Walton v. Small Business Administration, Williams v. Pierce, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, et al., Betka v. City of West Linn et al., Kajevic v. United States, McMillan v. Hester et al., Morvay v. Maghielse Tool & Die Co., Inc., Brown v. Rice et al., In re Brown, Skaggs et al. v. Crawford County, Ohio, et al., Howell v. Appling,

Opinion:
464 U. S. 1009;
464 U. S. 1046;
464 U. S. 979;
464 U. S. 1047;
464 U. S. 1010;
464 U. S. 1011;
464 U. S. 1019;
464 U. S. 1006;
464 U. S. 1019; and
464 U. S. 1072. Petitions
for rehearing denied.