Case Name: Anna Gundersen and Another, Respondents, v. The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1934-05
Citations: 241 A.D. 873
Docket Number: 
Parties: Anna Gundersen and Another, Respondents, v. The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 241
Pages: 873–873

Head Matter:
Anna Gundersen and Another, Respondents, v. The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, Appellant.

Opinion:
Order denying motion to resettle case on appeal affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. This court may not disturb the rulings of the trial judge in settling a case where an issue of fact arises as to whether an incident did or did not take place on a trial or an exception was or was not taken on a trial. In Zimmer v. Metropolitan Street R. Co. (28 App. Div. 504) there was no issue of fact arising as a result of conflicting contentions or affidavits. The lack of an exception will not disable this court from doing justice where a prejudicial ruling was made on an objection taken to an incident or a question. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.