Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymond TWINE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2003-12-19
Citations: 353 F.3d 690
Docket Number: No. 03-10393
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymond TWINE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, HAWKINS and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 353
Pages: 690–690

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymond TWINE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 03-10393.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Dec. 19, 2003.
Timothy J. Lucey, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Geoffrey A. Hansen, AFPD, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, HAWKINS and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
The parties shall file simultaneous letter briefs, each not to exceed fifteen (15) pages in length, setting forth their respective positions on whether this case should be reheard en banc. Fifty (50) copies shall be filed within twenty-one (21) days of the filed date of this Order.
In addition the points the parties would normally make, the briefs should address the following issues:
1. Whether the Bail Reform Act provides for a detention hearing in a case that "involves a crime of violence" as distinguished from a case where the "charged offense" is a crime of violence. 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(1); United States v. Byrd, 969 F.2d 106, 109-110 (5th Cir.1992).
2. Whether felon in possession of a firearm is a crime of violence for purposes of the Bail Reform Act. 18 U.S.C. § 922(g); compare United States v. Dillard, 214 F.3d 88 (2d Cir.2000), with United States v. Lane, 252 F.3d 905 (7th Cir.2001); United States v. Singleton, 182 F.3d 7 (D.C.Cir.1999); United States v. Canon, 993 F.2d 1439, 1441 (9th Cir.1993).