Case Name: Timothy BLACK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2004-08-30
Citations: 881 So. 2d 688
Docket Number: No. 1D02-1960
Parties: Timothy BLACK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ERVIN, BOOTH and KAHN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 881
Pages: 688–688

Head Matter:
Timothy BLACK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D02-1960.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Aug. 30, 2004.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Fred Parker Bingham, II, Special Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, Attorneys for Appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Alan R. Dakan, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, Attorneys for Appel-lee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant raises several issues on direct appeal. We affirm all issues on appeal without comment except Appellant's due process challenge to the sexual predator act. This Court has already resolved this issue against Appellant. See Frazier v. State, 29 Fla. L. Weekly D369, — So.2d -, 2004 WL 221043 (Fla. 1st DCA Feb.6, 2004); Therrien v. State, 859 So.2d 585 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). We certify conflict with Espindola v. State, 855 So.2d 1281, 1290 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).
AFFIRMED.
ERVIN, BOOTH and KAHN, JJ., concur.