Case Name: Martin LOVE, Appellant, v. CITY OF PEMBROKE PINES, a municipal corporation; City of Miramar, a municipal corporation; and Broward County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1987-09-09
Citations: 513 So. 2d 1284
Docket Number: No. 85-1327
Parties: Martin LOVE, Appellant, v. CITY OF PEMBROKE PINES, a municipal corporation; City of Miramar, a municipal corporation; and Broward County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Appellees.
Judges: ANSTEAD and DELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 513
Pages: 1284–1285

Head Matter:
Martin LOVE, Appellant, v. CITY OF PEMBROKE PINES, a municipal corporation; City of Miramar, a municipal corporation; and Broward County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Appellees.
No. 85-1327.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Sept. 9, 1987.
Rehearing Denied Nov. 13, 1987.
G. William Bissett, of Preddy, Kutner, Hardy, Rubinoff, Brown & Thompson, Miami, for appellant.
Pomeroy, Betts & Pomeroy, Port Lauder-dale, and William Liston and Steven R. Berger of Steven R. Berger, P.A., Miami, for appellee City of Pembroke Pines.
Patrick W. Gent of Finley, Kumble, Wagner, Heine, Underberg, Manley, Myerson & Casey, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee City of Miramar.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Reversed. In our view the record reflects an issue of fact as to whether the condition of the roadway was a legal cause of the accident in question and an issue of fact as to whether one or all of the appel-lees were responsible for the maintenance of the roadway at the time in question.
ANSTEAD and DELL, JJ., concur.
LETTS, J., dissents without opinion.