Case Name: Disciplinary Counsel v. Willard
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2010-03-04
Citations: 124 Ohio St. 3d 1221
Docket Number: No. 2009-0465
Parties: Disciplinary Counsel v. Willard.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 124
Pages: 1221–1221

Head Matter:
Disciplinary Counsel v. Willard.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Willard, 124 Ohio St.3d 1221, 2010-Ohio-1050.]
(No. 2009-0465
Submitted February 25, 2010
Decided March 4, 2010.)

Opinion:
{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, John Thaddeus Willard, Attorney Registration No. 0002125, last known business address in Hamilton, Ohio.
{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of July 30, 2009, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of one year with six months stayed on condition, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,
{¶ 3} It is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.
{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.
{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Willard, 123 Ohio St.3d 15, 2009-Ohio-3629, 913 N.E.2d 960.
Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.