Case Name: Victor Rodriguez et al., Respondents, v. Gaitree Tiwari et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1999-10-26
Citations: 265 A.D.2d 247
Docket Number: 
Parties: Victor Rodriguez et al., Respondents, v Gaitree Tiwari et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 265
Pages: 247–248

Head Matter:
Victor Rodriguez et al., Respondents, v Gaitree Tiwari et al., Appellants.
[697 NYS2d 24]

Opinion:
—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.), entered on or about June 29, 1998, which conditionally granted defendants' motions for preclusion and dismissal and imposed a monetary sanction, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Since there is no record support for defendants' claim that plaintiffs' discovery defaults were willful or contumacious, and since plaintiffs' compliance with discovery demands, albeit delayed, was substantial, the court appropriately exercised its discretion in affording plaintiffs a "second chance" (see, Hanson v City of New York, 227 AD2d 217). The court also appropriately exercised its discretion in considering response papers where the delay in submission was minimal (see, Foitl v G.A.F. Corp., 64 NY2d 911). Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Rosenberger, Williams, Wallach and Andrias, JJ.