Case Name: FINANCE & GUARANTY COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. Henry W. OPPENHIMER, Trustee in Bankruptcy for W. A. Lee, Trading as National Motor Company, Bankrupt, Defendant in Error
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1926-10-30
Citations: 15 F.2d 1011
Docket Number: No. 2506
Parties: FINANCE & GUARANTY COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. Henry W. OPPENHIMER, Trustee in Bankruptcy for W. A. Lee, Trading as National Motor Company, Bankrupt, Defendant in Error.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 15
Pages: 1011–1011

Head Matter:
FINANCE & GUARANTY COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. Henry W. OPPENHIMER, Trustee in Bankruptcy for W. A. Lee, Trading as National Motor Company, Bankrupt, Defendant in Error.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
October 30, 1926.)
No. 2506.
S. M. Brandt, of Norfolk, Va., for plaintiff in error.
Joseph M. Hurt, Jr., of Richmond, Va., for defendant in error.
Before WADDILL, ROSE, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This case has been before us twice. What we had to say about it at its first presentation will be found in 5 F. (2d) 486. When, in pursuance to our man•date, it was again tried below, a jury trial was waived in writing. The learned District Judge was thus made the trier of the facts, and he found that the value of the property converted by the appellant was $4,190.99. There was sufficient evidence.to support this conclusion, and its accuracy is not reviewable here.
On the fundamental question as to the relative rights of the trustee and the appellant, the case made at the second trial did not differ from the one upon which we had already passed. None of the exceptional circumstances which sometimes justify a departure from the rule of the law of the case are found here.
Affirmed.