Case Name: Penny CREATON, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Otis BOWEN, et al., Defendants-Appellees; Patricia VAN BERG, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. A.N. SHINPOCH, et al., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1987-08-26
Citations: 826 F.2d 6
Docket Number: Nos. 86-6148, 86-3870
Parties: Penny CREATON, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Otis BOWEN, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Patricia VAN BERG, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. A.N. SHINPOCH, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, WRIGHT and HALL, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 826
Pages: 6–6

Head Matter:
Penny CREATON, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Otis BOWEN, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Patricia VAN BERG, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. A.N. SHINPOCH, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Nos. 86-6148, 86-3870.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted April 7, 1987.
Decided Aug. 26, 1987.
Mark .Greenberg, Los Angeles, Cal., and Robin Zukoski, Seattle, Wash., for plaintiffs-appellants.
George Wu, Los Angeles, Cal, and P.K. Abraham, Seattle, Wash., for defendantsappellees.
Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, WRIGHT and HALL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
We affirm for the reasons stated in Gorrie v. Bowen, 809 F.2d 508 (8th Cir.1987), and Oliver v. Ledbetter, 821 F.2d 1507 (11th Cir.1987). See also Bowen v. Gilliard, - U.S. -, - n. 5, 107 S.Ct. 3008, 3013 n. 5, 97 L.Ed.2d 485 (1987) (citing Gorrie with approval).
AFFIRMED.