Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Antwain WHITE, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1998-06-09
Citations: 968 S.W.2d 267
Docket Number: No. 71441
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Antwain WHITE, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before CRANE, P.J., and RHODES RUSSELL, and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 968
Pages: 267–268

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Antwain WHITE, Defendant/Appellant.
No. 71441.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
June 9, 1998.
Gwenda R. Robinson, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for defendani/appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Cheryl A Caponegro, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiffy'respondent.
Before CRANE, P.J., and RHODES RUSSELL, and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Following trial, a jury convicted Defendant Antwain White of second degree murder in violation of section 565.021, RSMo 1994, and armed criminal action in violation of section 571.015, RSMo 1994. At sentencing, the trial court sentenced Defendant to two concurrent terms of thirteen years of imprisonment. On appeal, Defendant disputes the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction for second degree murder.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find there is sufficient evidence from which a reasonable juror could find Defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Grim, 854 S.W.2d 403, 405 (Mo. banc 1993). An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).