Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Donald COLEMAN, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2016-08-23
Citations: 502 S.W.3d 688
Docket Number: No. ED 103226
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Donald COLEMAN, Appellant.
Judges: Before James M. Dowd, P.J., Kurt S. Odenwald, J., and Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 502
Pages: 688–688

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Donald COLEMAN, Appellant.
No. ED 103226
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
FILED: August 23, 2016
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied September 27, 2016
Lisa M. Stroup, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Mary H. Moore, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before James M. Dowd, P.J., Kurt S. Odenwald, J., and Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Donald Coleman ("Coleman") appeals from a judgment of the trial court entered after a jury verdict convicting him on twenty-two felony counts. Each of the counts stem from a home invasion in which two armed men entered the home of C.F., confined C.F.'s children and disabled mother to a bedroom, subjected C.F. to sexual abuse, and stole a prepaid debit card. On appeal, Coleman alleges error in the trial court's admission of evidence suggesting that Coleman stole the gun that was found near the scene of the crime. Even if the trial court erred in allowing such evidence, Coleman suffered no outcome-determinative prejudice.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for then* information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).