Case Name: Rosie Hirschkowitz, Respondent, v. Davis Rosenkrantz, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1915-06
Citations: 169 A.D. 957
Docket Number: 
Parties: Rosie Hirschkowitz, Respondent, v. Davis Rosenkrantz, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 169
Pages: 957–957

Head Matter:
Rosie Hirschkowitz, Respondent, v. Davis Rosenkrantz, Appellant.

Opinion:
It would be difficult to conceive of a case of more unreasonable neglect on the part of the plaintiff herself and of her attorney to prosecute than appeared here. (Meyer v. Crimmins, 135 App. Div. 911.) The plaintiff has by no means successfully explained that delay. Therefore, the order-appealed from is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion to open the default and set aside the judgment is denied, with ten dollars costs. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Stapleton, Mills and Putnam, JJ., concurred.