Case Name: Timothy DICKENS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2009-11-24
Citations: 297 S.W.3d 673
Docket Number: No. ED 91531
Parties: Timothy DICKENS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J, and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 297
Pages: 673–673

Head Matter:
Timothy DICKENS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. ED 91531.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Nov. 24, 2009.
Nancy A. McKerrow, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Karen L. Kramer, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J, and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Timothy Dickens, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing.
The motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).