Case Name: Pick King v. The State
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1910-05-18
Citations: 59 Tex. Crim. 511
Docket Number: No. 618
Parties: Pick King v. The State.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Criminal Reports
Volume: 59
Pages: 511–512

Head Matter:
Pick King v. The State.
No. 618.
Decided May 18, 1910.
Rehearing granted June 8, 1910.
Local Option—Statement of Facts—Filing and Approval—Practice on Appeal.
Where, upon appeal from a conviction of a violation of the local option law, the same was affirmed because the trial judge had not approved the statements of facts and bills of exception, and it appeared on motion to reinstate that this failure of the judge’s approval arose from no negligence or fault on the part of appellant, the cause will be reversed and remanded.
Appeal from the County Court of Hill. Tried below before the Hon. Horton B. Porter.
Appeal from a conviction of a violation of the local option law; penalty, a fine of $25' and twenty days confinement in. the county jail. The opinion states the case.
Collins & Cummings, for appellant.
John A. Mobley, Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

Opinion:
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
This conviction was for violation of the local option law.
The bills of exception and statement of facts are not approved by the trial judge, and, therefore, can not be considered. There are no questions that can be considered or revised without the statement of facts and bills of exception. As the record is presented the judgment will be affirmed.
Affirmed.
ON REHEARING.
June 8, 1910.