Case Name: Cheryl Walker, Respondent, v. State of New York, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2002-02-01
Citations: 291 A.D.2d 894
Docket Number: Claim No. 90072
Parties: Cheryl Walker, Respondent, v State of New York, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 291
Pages: 894–894

Head Matter:
Cheryl Walker, Respondent, v State of New York, Appellant.
(Claim No. 90072.)
[737 NYS2d 570]

Opinion:
—Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims (Midey, Jr., J.), entered October 3, 2000, which denied defendant's motion for summary judgment.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed with costs..
Memorandum: The Court of Claims properly denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the claim. Defendant is not entitled to summary judgment based solely upon alleged deficiencies in claimant's proof and thus failed to establish its entitlement to judgment in its favor as a matter of law (see, Hicks v City of Buffalo, 281 AD2d 922; see also, Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853). Present— Green, J.P., Pine, Kehoe and Gorski, JJ.