Case Name: Mark A. POWELL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2006-04-18
Citations: 189 S.W.3d 651
Docket Number: No. ED 86645
Parties: Mark A. POWELL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 189
Pages: 651–651

Head Matter:
Mark A. POWELL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 86645.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
April 18, 2006.
Mark A. Powell, Charleston, MO, Appellant Acting Pro se.
Stephanie Morrell, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and BOOKER T. SHAW, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Mark A. Powell, appeals from the judgment denying his motion to reopen his Rule 29.15 motion. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).