Case Name: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. Anthony L. LETA, Appellant; COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. Frank R. PRICCI, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1988-10-17
Citations: 519 Pa. 317
Docket Number: Appeal Nos. 23 and M.D. Appeal Dkt. 1987
Parties: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. Anthony L. LETA, Appellant. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. Frank R. PRICCI, Appellant.
Judges: Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, ZAPPALA PAPADAKOS and STOUT, jj.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 519
Pages: 317–318

Head Matter:
548 A.2d 250
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. Anthony L. LETA, Appellant. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. Frank R. PRICCI, Appellant.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued May 10, 1988.
Decided Oct. 17, 1988.
Peter T. Campana, Williamsport, for appellants.
Robert A. Graci, Chief Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, ZAPPALA PAPADAKOS and STOUT, jj.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The orders of the Superior Court in these matters are vacated. Insofar as the decision of the Superior Court relied upon the case of Commonwealth v. Miller, 334 Pa.Super. 374, 483 A.2d 498 (1984), it is reversed. See Commonwealth v. Miller, 513 Pa. 118, 518 A.2d 1187 (1986). These cases are remanded to the Superior Court for a decision on whether appellants here were entitled to pursue the line of questioning which resulted in the need for the in camera hearings. See Miller, id., 513 Pa. at 134-135, 518 A.2d 1195.
ZAPPALA, J., files a dissenting opinion in which FLAHERTY, J., joins.