Case Name: STATE of Missouri, ex rel. MISSOURI HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. The CLARKSON GROUP, et al. Exceptions of the Clarkson Group, et al., Defendants/Appellants
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-11-28
Citations: 916 S.W.2d 233
Docket Number: No. 67538
Parties: STATE of Missouri, ex rel. MISSOURI HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. The CLARKSON GROUP, et al. Exceptions of the Clarkson Group, et al., Defendants/Appellants.
Judges: Before AHRENS, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GRIMM, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 916
Pages: 233–234

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, ex rel. MISSOURI HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. The CLARKSON GROUP, et al. Exceptions of the Clarkson Group, et al., Defendants/Appellants.
No. 67538.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Nov. 28, 1995.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 29, 1996.
Application to Transfer Denied March 26, 1996.
David O. Danis, Paul J. Vaporean, Danis, Cooper, Cavanagh & Hartweger, St. Louis, for appellant.
Laura A. Schildz, Rich Tiemeyer, Chesterfield, for respondent.
Before AHRENS, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GRIMM, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
In this condemnation action, owner appeals arguing the trial court erred in giving a withdrawal instruction requiring the jury to disregard portions of testimony by owner's expert witness. Owner also appeals the admission into evidence of a lease on Parcel One. Finally, owner contends the jury's verdict was against the weight of the evidence.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).