Case Name: Mary Kula, appellant, v. Tom Kula, appellee, Joe Kula et al., interveners-appellees
Court: Nebraska Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Nebraska
Decision Date: 1966-11-18
Citations: 180 Neb. 893
Docket Number: No. 36469
Parties: Mary Kula, appellant, v. Tom Kula, appellee, Joe Kula et al., interveners-appellees.
Judges: Heard before White, C. J., Carter, Spencer, Boslaugh, Smith, and McCown, JJ., and Boyles, District Judge.
Reporter: Nebraska Reports
Volume: 180
Pages: 893–893

Head Matter:
Mary Kula, appellant, v. Tom Kula, appellee, Joe Kula et al., interveners-appellees.
146 N. W. 2d 384
Filed November 18, 1966.
No. 36469.
Kelley, Grant & Costello, for appellant.
Lathrop & Albracht, for appellee.
Heard before White, C. J., Carter, Spencer, Boslaugh, Smith, and McCown, JJ., and Boyles, District Judge.

Opinion:
McCown, J.
The defendant and appellee has filed a motion in this court for an order requiring the plaintiff and appellant to surrender possession of a dwelling in accordance with the final decree of the district court in a divorce action. Although the case is now pending on appeal in this court, no supersedeas was filed. The appeal, therefore, does not operate as a stay of proceedings. The district court has jurisdiction and may enforce the award as in the case of any other nonsuperseded judgment. See Hall v. Hall, 176 Neb. 555, 126 N. W. 2d 839. The motion is therefore denied.
Motion denied.