Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Curtis BURSTON, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-08-21
Citations: 475 F. App'x 939
Docket Number: No. 12-6970
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Curtis BURSTON, Jr., Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 475
Pages: 939–940

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Curtis BURSTON, Jr., Defendant—Appellant.
No. 12-6970.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 16, 2012.
Decided: Aug. 21, 2012.
Curtis Burston, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly Ann Moore, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Curtis Burston, Jr., appeals district court orders denying his motion for relief from his sentence and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's orders, and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Burston, No. 5:04-cr-00371-F-2 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 25, 2012; May 17, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.