Case Name: Lawrence Daniel DOW, Appellant, v. Sylvia ROBARDS, individually, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Mable Dow, and as Successor Trustee of the Trust Agreement of Mable Dow dated November 17, 1993, as amended, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-05-01
Citations: 826 So. 2d 345
Docket Number: No. 3D01-2501
Parties: Lawrence Daniel DOW, Appellant, v. Sylvia ROBARDS, individually, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Mable Dow, and as Successor Trustee of the Trust Agreement of Mable Dow dated November 17, 1993, as amended, Appellees.
Judges: Before COPE, LEVY and RAMIREZ, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 826
Pages: 345–345

Head Matter:
Lawrence Daniel DOW, Appellant, v. Sylvia ROBARDS, individually, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Mable Dow, and as Successor Trustee of the Trust Agreement of Mable Dow dated November 17, 1993, as amended, Appellees.
No. 3D01-2501.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 1, 2002.
Rehearing Denied Sept. 25, 2002.
Krasney and Dettmer and Scott Krasny, Melbourne, for appellant.
Treiser, Lieberfarb, Collins & Vernon and Benjamin C. Iseman, Naples, and Michael E. Kohn, for appellees.
Before COPE, LEVY and RAMIREZ, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from an order which approves an accounting and certain expenditures by Sylvia Robards as personal representative of the estate of Mable Dow, and as successor trustee of a trust established by Mable Dow. We find no error by the trial court in the interpretation of the will, the trust agreement and amendments thereto, and the applicable statutes.
Both sides agree that there is a technical error in paragraph six of the trial court's order. The parties agree that the percentage allocations set forth in paragraph six were intended to apply to expenditures made after the date of the trial court's order, but do not apply to expenditures already made. With that exception, the order now under review is affirmed.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for correction of order.