Case Name: Alfred Blumenthal and Miriam Rogers, Defendants Below, Appellants, vs. Margaret Fears Blumenthal, Complainant Below, Appellee
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Delaware
Decision Date: 1945-02-26
Citations: 28 Del. Ch. 448
Docket Number: 
Parties: Alfred Blumenthal and Miriam Rogers, Defendants Below, Appellants, vs. Margaret Fears Blumenthal, Complainant Below, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Delaware Chancery Reports
Volume: 28
Pages: 448–448

Head Matter:
Alfred Blumenthal and Miriam Rogers, Defendants Below, Appellants, vs. Margaret Fears Blumenthal, Complainant Below, Appellee.
Supreme Court, On Appeal,
February 26, 1945.
Before Layton, C. J., and Richards, Rodney, Speak-man and Terry, JJ.
John J. Morris, of Bering, Morris, James and Hitch-ens, for appellants.
Aaron Finger, of Richards, Layton and Finger for appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We find no substantial error in the proceedings in this case, and the decree is therefore affirmed. A restatement of the pertinent principles by another and independent opinion would result in no apparent advantage. (See ante p. 1 for opinion below.)
In addition to the authorities cited in the court's opinion (ante p. 1, 35 A. 2d 831) some additional support may be found in Quarl v. Abbett, 102 Ind. 233, 1 N.E. 476, 52 Am. Rep. 662, and in cases listed in 126 A.L.R. 664, and 145 A.L.R. 1394.