Case Name: RITA ROCHE, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JOSEPH J. ROCHE, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. FLORAL RENTAL CORP., ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. U. S. REFRIGERATION CORP., A CORPORATION THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT, AND J. C. TRUCK EQUIPMENT, INC., A CORPORATION, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1968-01-04
Citations: 51 N.J. 26
Docket Number: 
Parties: RITA ROCHE, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JOSEPH J. ROCHE, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. FLORAL RENTAL CORP., ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. U. S. REFRIGERATION CORP., A CORPORATION THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT, AND J. C. TRUCK EQUIPMENT, INC., A CORPORATION, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 51
Pages: 26–26

Head Matter:
RITA ROCHE, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JOSEPH J. ROCHE, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. FLORAL RENTAL CORP., ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. U. S. REFRIGERATION CORP., A CORPORATION THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT, AND J. C. TRUCK EQUIPMENT, INC., A CORPORATION, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Argued December 19,1967
Decided January 4,1968.
Mr. Joseph V. Cullum for defendant-appellant.
Mr. Joseph Goult for defendants-respondents (Mr. Philip M. Lusibader, Messrs. Schneider & Morgan, Messrs. Shenier & Gilady, attorneys).
Mr. Arthur G. Gundersdorf for the plaintiff-respondent (Messrs. Nochimson, Irwin and Larsen, attorneys).

Opinion:
Pee Cubiam.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Gaulkin in the Appellate Division, 95 N. J. Super. 555.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintbaub and Justices Jacobs, Feancis, Peoctoe, Goldmann, Sohettino and Haneman—7.
For reversal—None.