Case Name: Samuel Burstein, Appellant, v. Arthur Castellano, Defendant, and Pauline Castellano, Defendant-Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1943-03-24
Citations: 180 Misc. 213
Docket Number: 
Parties: Samuel Burstein, Appellant, v. Arthur Castellano, Defendant, and Pauline Castellano, Defendant-Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Miscellaneous Reports
Volume: 180
Pages: 213–214

Head Matter:
Samuel Burstein, Appellant, v. Arthur Castellano, Defendant, and Pauline Castellano, Defendant-Respondent.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,
March 24, 1943.
Samuel Burstein, appellant in person.
No appearance for defendant-respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Under section 684 of the Civil Practice Act, plaintiff was entitled to have a garnishee execution. The City Court order fining the defendant for contempt and directing installment payments of five dollars a month is not a bar to obtaining a garnishee execution under section 684 of the Civil Practice Act.
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion denied.
Shientag, Bosenman and McLaughlin, JJ., concur.