Case Name: R. E. Thomas, et al., v. Sheppard-Notter Co., a Corp., etc., et al.
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1935-10-11
Citations: 121 Fla. 191
Docket Number: 
Parties: R. E. Thomas, et al., v. Sheppard-Notter Co., a Corp., etc., et al.
Judges: Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Brown, Buford, and Davis, J. J., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 121
Pages: 191–192

Head Matter:
R. E. Thomas, et al., v. Sheppard-Notter Co., a Corp., etc., et al.
163 So. 524.
Opinion Filed October 11, 1935.
John B. Singeltary and /. Henry Buttram, for Appellants;
Dewey A. Dye, for Appellees.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The appeal brings for review order overruling motion to dismiss bill of complaint, the purpose of which was to foreclose on an alleged mortgage indebtedness.
While a motion for compulsory amendment and for bill of particulars' might have been warranted by reason of some indefiniteness in the allegation of the bill, it appears that the bill of complaint is not entirely without equity and, therefore, the order of the Chancellor must be affirmed.
It is so ordered.
Affirmed.
Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Brown, Buford, and Davis, J. J., concur.