Case Name: Ernest SOLOMON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1966-05-03
Citations: 185 So. 2d 784
Docket Number: No. 65-607
Parties: Ernest SOLOMON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before HENDRY, C. J., and CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 185
Pages: 784–785

Head Matter:
Ernest SOLOMON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 65-607.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
May 3, 1966.
Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender and Phillip A. Hubbart, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Arden M. Siegendorf, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before HENDRY, C. J., and CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
On this appeal by the defendant below, Ernest Solomon, from a judgment of con viction for breaking and entering with intent to commit a felony and for grand larceny, reversal is sought on the ground that his confession, received at trial, should have been excluded because it was the fruit of an unlawful arrest. The trial judge concluded the arrest in this case, made without a warrant under § 901.15(2), Fla.Stat., F.S.A., was lawful in the circumstances presented. On consideration of the record and briefs we find no sufficient ground or reason to disturb that holding.
Affirmed.