Case Name: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, v. Peter A. Fonte, Defendant-Appellant
Court: Wisconsin Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Wisconsin
Decision Date: 2005-10-21
Citations: 286 Wis. 2d 77
Docket Number: No. 2003AP2097-CR
Parties: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, v. Peter A. Fonte, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: ¶ 4. N. PATRICK CROOKS, J., did not participate.
Reporter: Wisconsin Reports Second
Volume: 286
Pages: 77–78

Head Matter:
State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, v. Peter A. Fonte, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court
No. 2003AP2097-CR.
Decided October 21, 2005.
2005 WI 145
(Also reported in 704 N.W.2d 912.)

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
¶ 1. The defendant, Peter A. Fonte, moves the court to withdraw and reconsider its opinion in State v. Fonte, 2005 WI 77, 281 Wis. 2d 654, 698 N.W.2d 594. Fonte contends that the court (1) made a factual error in footnote nine of its opinion; (2) should further address the court of appeals' rationale for granting relief in favor of Fonte; and (3) should "reconsider its conclusion that evidence of Fonte's aliases did not harm his defense because the nature of his crime was accidental rather than intentional."
¶ 2. To clarify the opinion, we modify ¶ 29, footnote 9, to read as follows:
9 The jury heard expert testimony that Fonte had a blood alcohol level at the time of the accident of at least 0.122.
¶ 3. The motion for reconsideration is denied without costs.
¶ 4. N. PATRICK CROOKS, J., did not participate.