Case Name: In the MATTER OF Kevin C. FOGLE, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 027342014)
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 2018-11-02
Citations: 196 A.3d 562
Docket Number: D-123 September Term 2017; 081030
Parties: In the MATTER OF Kevin C. FOGLE, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 027342014)
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 196
Pages: 562–563

Head Matter:
In the MATTER OF Kevin C. FOGLE, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 027342014)
D-123 September Term 2017
081030
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
November 2, 2018
ORDER

Opinion:
The Disciplinary Review Board on having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 17-358, concluding that as a matter of reciprocal discipline pursuant to Rule 1:20-14, Kevin C. Fogle of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2014, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months based on discipline imposed in Pennsylvania for unethical conduct that in New Jersey constitutes violations of RPC 1.4(b) (failure to communicate with client); RPC 1.15(a) (failure to safeguard funds); RPC 1.15(b) (failure to promptly notify client of receipt of funds and to promptly deliver the monies); RPC 1.15(d) (failure to comply with the recordkeeping requirements of Rule 1:21-6(c) ); RPC 1.16(a)(l) (failure to withdraw from representation of a client when the representation will result in the violation of the RPC s); RPC 1.16(d) (failure to protect the client's interest on termination of representation); RPC 4.2 (communication with a person represented by counsel); RPC 8.1 (b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities); and RPC 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice);
And good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that Kevin C. Fogle is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months, effective November 30, 2018, and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys; and it is further
ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 1:20-20(c), respondent's failure to comply with the Affidavit of Compliance requirement of Rule 1:20-20(b)( 15) may (1) preclude the Disciplinary Review Board from considering respondent's petition for reinstatement for a period of up to six months from the date respondent files proof of compliance; (2) be found to constitute a violation of RPC 8.1(b) and RPC 8.4(d) ; and (3) provide a basis for an action for contempt pursuant to Rule 1:10-2; and it is further
ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.