Case Name: Lucille F. DUNCAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2007-12-26
Citations: 241 S.W.3d 441
Docket Number: No. WD 67621
Parties: Lucille F. DUNCAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before HOWARD, C.J., and SPINDEN and HOLLIGER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 241
Pages: 441–441

Head Matter:
Lucille F. DUNCAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 67621.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Dec. 26, 2007.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Irene C. Earns, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Before HOWARD, C.J., and SPINDEN and HOLLIGER, JJ.

Opinion:
Order
PER CURIAM.
Lucille Duncan appeals the denial of her Rule 29.15 Motion for ineffective assistance of counsel. Duncan argues that because her trial attorney failed to call two witnesses, she did not receive adequate representation. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Duncan's trial attorney acted as a reasonably competent lawyer in deciding not to call either witness.
Rule 84.16(b).