Case Name: Celia Friedman, Appellant, v. Julius Blauner and Another, Respondents
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1919-05
Citations: 188 A.D. 919
Docket Number: 
Parties: Celia Friedman, Appellant, v. Julius Blauner and Another, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 188
Pages: 919–920

Head Matter:
Celia Friedman, Appellant, v. Julius Blauner and Another, Respondents.

Opinion:
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Smith, Page and Philbin, JJ.; Dowling and Smith, JJ., dissented on the ground that the offer of judgment in question was not executed as required by section 738 of the Code of Civil Procedure and that, having been executed by one member of the copartnership, it did not bind his partner, the other defendant, without proof of his authority being annexed thereto and accompanying the same, as required by the Code.
See Code Civ. Proc. § 738, 740.— [Rep.