Case Name: Douglas Granillo, Respondent, v. Donna Karen Co., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, and Richter & Ratner Contracting Corp. et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants. All City Interior Contracting, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2005-11-22
Citations: 5 N.Y.3d 878
Docket Number: 
Parties: Douglas Granillo, Respondent, v Donna Karen Co., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, and Richter & Ratner Contracting Corp. et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants. All City Interior Contracting, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 5
Pages: 878–878

Head Matter:
Douglas Granillo, Respondent, v Donna Karen Co., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, and Richter & Ratner Contracting Corp. et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants. All City Interior Contracting, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
Submitted September 19, 2005;
decided November 22, 2005

Opinion:
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal as against Douglas Granillo, dismissed upon the ground that as to that party the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.