Case Name: Hurst v. The State
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1922-04-11
Citations: 28 Ga. App. 471
Docket Number: 13313
Parties: Hurst v. The State.
Judges: Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworfh, J, concur.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 28
Pages: 471–471

Head Matter:
13313.
Hurst v. The State.
Decided April 11, 1922.
Accusation of possessing liquor; from city court of Wrightsville — Judge Sturgis presiding. December 20, 1921.
B. B. Blount, for plaintiff in error.
W. C. Brinson, solicitor, contra.

Opinion:
Luke, J.
The special grounds of the motion for a new trial, when the charge of the court is considered in its entirety and as adjusted to the evidence, is without merit.
There is some evidence to authorize the verdict, and, the verdict having the approval of the trial judge, it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial. .
Judgment affirmed.
Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworfh, J, concur.