Case Name: PAUL ROUSSET, Appellant, v. ROBERT BOYLE, Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1872-12-11
Citations: 1 Cal. Unrep. 768
Docket Number: No. 3546
Parties: PAUL ROUSSET, Appellant, v. ROBERT BOYLE, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Unreported Cases
Volume: 1
Pages: 768–769

Head Matter:
PAUL ROUSSET, Appellant, v. ROBERT BOYLE, Respondent.
No. 3546;
December 11, 1872.
Appeal — Statement.—Upon an Appeal from an Order Which is not Based solely on affidavits, review will not be had unless a statement on appeal is annexed to the order.
APPEAL from Fourth Judicial District, San Francisco County.
McAllister & Berger for appellant; Sharp & Lloyd for respondent.
See Rousset v. Boyle, 45 Cal. 64.

Opinion:
By the COURT.
— The order sought to be reversed appears to have been made by the court below upon a consideration of its records and files as well as upon the affidavits presented. What these records and files were does not appear. There is no settled or certified statement on appeal from the order, and we have often reiterated that upon an appeal from an order, which is not based solely upon affidavits, we will not review it, unless a statement on appeal is annexed to the order. Some of the cases upon this point are: Haggin v. Clark, 28 Cal. 162; Leffingwell v. Griffing, 29 Cal. 192; Wetherbee v. Carroll, 33 Cal. 554; Cross v. Zane, at the present term.
Order affirmed.