Case Name: FRANK M. SPRAGUE, RESPONDENT, v. JOSEPH A. PENROSE ET AL., APPELLANTS
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1932-10-17
Citations: 109 N.J.L. 347
Docket Number: 
Parties: FRANK M. SPRAGUE, RESPONDENT, v. JOSEPH A. PENROSE ET AL., APPELLANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 109
Pages: 347–347

Head Matter:
FRANK M. SPRAGUE, RESPONDENT, v. JOSEPH A. PENROSE ET AL., APPELLANTS.
Argued May 18, 1932 —
Decided October 17, 1932.
For the respondent, Geran, Matlack & Laulman.
For the appellants, Walter Carson.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion filed in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Tbenchabd, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Bbogan, Van Busiciek, Kays, Deab, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.