Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Michael COONCE, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-05-06
Citations: 35 F. App'x 276
Docket Number: No. 01-3967
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Michael COONCE, Appellant.
Judges: Before MURPHY, BYE, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 35
Pages: 276–277

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Michael COONCE, Appellant.
No. 01-3967.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted April 30, 2002.
Filed May 6, 2002.
Before MURPHY, BYE, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Michael Coonce pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute in excess of 500 grams of a mixture or substance containing methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. The district court, after granting motions for downward departure under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3 and 18 U.S.C. § 3553(e), sentenced Coonce to 60 months imprisonment and 5 years supervised release. On appeal, counsel has moved to withdraw under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and has filed a brief arguing that the district court erred in giving Coonce a 2-level firearm enhancement and in denying him a minor-participant reduction.
These arguments are unreviewable because Coonce's 60-month sentence is still a downward departure from the Guidelines range that would have resulted if he had prevailed on the arguments. See United States v. Wyatt, 26 F.3d 863, 864 (8th Cir.1994) (per curiam). Further, even if the arguments were renewable, we would not find that the district court clearly erred either in giving Coonce the firearm enhancement or in denying him a minor-participant reduction. See U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1 comment, (n.3); United States v. Calderin-Rodriguez, 244 F.3d 977, 987-88 (8th Cir.2001); United States v. O'Dell, 204 F.3d 829, 837-38 (8th Cir.2000). Moreover, following our independent review, see Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues.
Accordingly, we affirm, and we grant counsel's motion to withdraw.
. The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.