Case Name: The People of the State of New York ex rel. James Courtney, Appellant, v. New York State Division of Parole, Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1994-10-04
Citations: 208 A.D.2d 352
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York ex rel. James Courtney, Appellant, v New York State Division of Parole, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 208
Pages: 352–352

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York ex rel. James Courtney, Appellant, v New York State Division of Parole, Respondent.
[616 NYS2d 740]

Opinion:
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Dorothy Chin Brandt, J.), entered on or about August 9, 1993, dismissing appellant's petition for a writ of habeas corpus, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The IAS Court properly determined that appellant was not entitled to the five-day notice requirement contained in Executive Law § 259-i (3) (c) (iii), since Executive Law § 259-i (3) (c) (i) eliminated the necessity for a preliminary revocation hearing in appellant's case, due to his 1992 conviction in North Carolina while still under parole supervision in New York (Matter of Gonzalez v New York State Div. of Parole, 176 AD2d 237). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Ellerin, Ross, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.