Case Name: Jean Paul GAMARRA, Appellant v. Hillary Rodham CLINTON, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-01-25
Citations: 689 F. App'x 648
Docket Number: No. 16-5323
Parties: Jean Paul GAMARRA, Appellant v. Hillary Rodham CLINTON, Appellee
Judges: BEFORE: Henderson and Tatel, Circuit Judges, and Ginsburg, Senior Circuit Judge
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 689
Pages: 648–648

Head Matter:
Jean Paul GAMARRA, Appellant v. Hillary Rodham CLINTON, Appellee
No. 16-5323
September Term, 2016
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Filed On: January 25, 2017
Jean Paul Gamarra, Pro Se.
R. Craig Lawrence, U.S. Attorney’s Office (USA), Civil Division, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee.
BEFORE: Henderson and Tatel, Circuit Judges, and Ginsburg, Senior Circuit Judge

Opinion:
JUDGMENT
Per Curiam
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant on November 15, 2016, and the supplement thereto. See Fed. R. App, P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). Upon consideration of the foregoing and the notices filed by appellant, it is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's order entered October 6, 2016 be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed appellant's complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on the ground that it is " 'patently insubstantial,' presenting no federal question suitable for decision." Tooley v. Napolitano, 586 F.3d 1006, 1009 (D.C. Cir. 2009) (quoting Best v. Kelly, 39 F.3d 328, 330 (D.C. Cir. 1994)).
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.