Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James BISHOP, Jr., aka James Brewer, aka Dan Vamphyere, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-07-29
Citations: 41 F. App'x 981
Docket Number: No. 00-10563; D.C. No. CR-99-20103-RMW
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James BISHOP, Jr., aka James Brewer, aka Dan Vamphyere, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 41
Pages: 981–982

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James BISHOP, Jr., aka James Brewer, aka Dan Vamphyere, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 00-10563.
D.C. No. CR-99-20103-RMW.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 22, 2002.
Decided July 29, 2002.
Before BROWNING, KOZINSKI, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
James Bishop appeals his fifteen month sentence imposed after his guilty plea conviction for one count of forging endorsements on treasury checks, one count of passing a treasury check, and one count of bribing a bank employee in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 510(a)(1), 510(a)(2), and 215(a)(1), respectively. We dismiss.
Bishop contends that the district court erred in calculating his sentence. The government argues that Bishop has waived his right to appeal. Based on our de novo review, United States v. Nunez, 223 F.3d 956, 958 (9th Cir.2000), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 272, 151 L.Ed.2d 199 (2001), we agree with the government. Bishop knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal by entering into a plea agreement which provided that he waived all rights to appeal his conviction and sentence. See id. at 958-59.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.