Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis Antonio CAMEY-ALVARADO, aka Carney Rosario, Santos Balvino, Juan Lopez, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-01-26
Citations: 362 F. App'x 888
Docket Number: No. 07-50359
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis Antonio CAMEY-ALVARADO, aka Carney Rosario, Santos Balvino, Juan Lopez, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: BEEZER, TROTT, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 362
Pages: 888–889

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis Antonio CAMEY-ALVARADO, aka Carney Rosario, Santos Balvino, Juan Lopez, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-50359.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 11, 2010.
Filed Jan. 26, 2010.
April Anita Christine, Esquire, Michael J. Raphael, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Shawn R. Perez, Law Offices of Shawn R. Perez, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.
Luis Antonio Camey-Alvaro, pro se.
Before: BEEZER, TROTT, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Luis Antonio Camey-Alvarado appeals from the 120-month sentence imposed fol lowing his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), 846. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Camey-Alvarado contends that the district court erred when it determined that he was not eligible for safety-valve relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f). We are precluded from reaching the merits of this claim by the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nunez, 223 F.3d 956, 958-59 (9th Cir.2000); see also United States v. Jacobo Castillo, 496 F.3d 947, 957 (9th Cir.2007) (en banc).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.