Case Name: PATRICK CUNNINGHAM vs. THE NEW HAVEN SAVINGS BANK
Court: Connecticut Superior Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1938-02-05
Citations: 5 Conn. Supp. 449
Docket Number: File #53888
Parties: PATRICK CUNNINGHAM vs. THE NEW HAVEN SAVINGS BANK
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Supplement
Volume: 5
Pages: 449–450

Head Matter:
PATRICK CUNNINGHAM vs. THE NEW HAVEN SAVINGS BANK
Superior Court New Haven County
File #53888
Present: Hon. ALFRED C. BALDWIN, Judge.
FitzGerald, Foote 6? FitzGerald, Attorneys for the Plaintiff.
Watrous, Hewitt, Gumbart 6? Corbin, Attorneys for the Defendant.
MEMORANDUM FILED FEBRUARY 5, 1938.

Opinion:
BALDWIN, J.
The question raised by this plea is whether the plaintiff is an employee or a tenant of the defendant. If, at the time of the accident, he was an employee the compensation act would control and this plea would be good and this action would fail; if he was a tenant at the time, then this action should stand and this plea should be denied.
For a number of years plaintiff has occupied a room in a building owned by the defendant for which he paid a rental of $50. a month. This rental, some years ago, was reduced to $25. a month, and for a period of a year or more, including the time when the accident occurred, the defendant was apparently charging the plaintiff no rent for the room he occupied. Since this action was brought it appeared that the defendant had told the plaintiff that he should begin paying a rental.
For a period of time extending over some years plaintiff has swept a stairway and halls leading to his room and has shown prospective tenants a room or rooms in the building that were for rent.
Under these circumstances plaintiff was a tenant and not an employee.
The plea to the jurisdiction is denied.