Case Name: James AMENDOLA, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1928-05-21
Citations: 26 F.2d 1015
Docket Number: No. 352
Parties: James AMENDOLA, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error.
Judges: Before L. HAND, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 26
Pages: 1015–1015

Head Matter:
James AMENDOLA, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
May 21, 1928.
No. 352.
Thomas Cradock Hughes, of Brooklyn, N. Y., for plaintiff in error.
William A. De Groot, U. S. Atty., of Brooklyn, N. Y. (Herbert H. Kellogg, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Brooklyn, N. Y., of counsel), for the United States.
Before L. HAND, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This ease is a second trial on the indictment before us in Amendola v. U. S. (C. C. A.), 17 F.(2d) 529. The evidence was the same and the judge carefully left it to the jury to say where the sale took place. They must he understood to have held that Marinelli was Amendola's agent. This was enough.
On confession of error the judgment is reversed on the first, second, and fourth counts. It is affirmed on the third.