Case Name: GLADYS LAZZIO, ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSQUENDUM, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. PRIMO SILK COMPANY, INCORPORATED, APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1935-10-09
Citations: 115 N.J.L. 506
Docket Number: 
Parties: GLADYS LAZZIO, ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSQUENDUM, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. PRIMO SILK COMPANY, INCORPORATED, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 115
Pages: 506–506

Head Matter:
GLADYS LAZZIO, ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSQUENDUM, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. PRIMO SILK COMPANY, INCORPORATED, APPELLANT.
Submitted May 31, 1935
Decided October 9, 1935.
For the respondent, Isadore Rabinowitz.
For the appellant, Cox & Walburg.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance— The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Van Buskirk, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.