Case Name: Mark BRADLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1992-07-07
Citations: 835 S.W.2d 524
Docket Number: No. 61109
Parties: Mark BRADLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 835
Pages: 524–524

Head Matter:
Mark BRADLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. 61109.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
July 7, 1992.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 12, 1992.
Application to Transfer Denied Sept. 22, 1992.
Deborah B. Wafer, St. Louis, for appellant.
William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Rudolph R. Rhodes, IV, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Mark Bradley, appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis. We have reviewed the briefs and arguments of the parties, the transcript and the legal files and find the motion court's finding of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. As we further find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion, we affirm the motion court's ruling pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.