Case Name: Anthony BOYLE and Maureen Boyle, h/w, Respondents. v. INDEPENDENT LIFT TRUCK, INC. and Frank Fatiga, Jr., Petitioners
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2009-12-31
Citations: 987 A.2d 717
Docket Number: 
Parties: Anthony BOYLE and Maureen Boyle, h/w, Respondents. v. INDEPENDENT LIFT TRUCK, INC. and Frank Fatiga, Jr., Petitioners.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 987
Pages: 717–717

Head Matter:
Anthony BOYLE and Maureen Boyle, h/w, Respondents. v. INDEPENDENT LIFT TRUCK, INC. and Frank Fatiga, Jr., Petitioners.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Dec. 31, 2009.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 31st day of December, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:
Did the Superior Court err in ordering a new trial due to an allegedly improper verdict slip question on comparative negligence, where the jury never reached the issue of comparative negligence?