Case Name: Frank A. BALCAR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BELL & ASSOCIATES LLC; Harry F. Bell, Jr., AIC Attorney; William L. Bands, AIC Attorney; Avemco Insurance Company; A. Churchey, West Virginia Resident Agent; Carole Hartman, West Virginia Resident Agent; John Watson; Gregg A. Pike; Richard Boeschen; Steven M. Homenda; Gene Scheil; Richard Homel, AIC Managing General Agents; James Nelson, AIC Vice President; John DOES, 1 thru 20 as they may appear; Thomas Offutt, AIC Assistant Vice President-Legal, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-12-19
Citations: 53 F. App'x 256
Docket Number: No. 02-2185
Parties: Frank A. BALCAR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BELL & ASSOCIATES LLC; Harry F. Bell, Jr., AIC Attorney; William L. Bands, AIC Attorney; Avemco Insurance Company; A. Churchey, West Virginia Resident Agent; Carole Hartman, West Virginia Resident Agent; John Watson; Gregg A. Pike; Richard Boeschen; Steven M. Homenda; Gene Scheil; Richard Homel, AIC Managing General Agents; James Nelson, AIC Vice President; John DOES, 1 thru 20 as they may appear; Thomas Offutt, AIC Assistant Vice President-Legal, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 53
Pages: 256–257

Head Matter:
Frank A. BALCAR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BELL & ASSOCIATES LLC; Harry F. Bell, Jr., AIC Attorney; William L. Bands, AIC Attorney; Avemco Insurance Company; A. Churchey, West Virginia Resident Agent; Carole Hartman, West Virginia Resident Agent; John Watson; Gregg A. Pike; Richard Boeschen; Steven M. Homenda; Gene Scheil; Richard Homel, AIC Managing General Agents; James Nelson, AIC Vice President; John DOES, 1 thru 20 as they may appear; Thomas Offutt, AIC Assistant Vice President-Legal, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 02-2185.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 16, 2002.
Decided Dec. 19, 2002.
Frank A. Balear, Appellant Pro Se. William L. Bands, Bell & Bands, P.L.L.C., Charleston, West Virginia; Charles M. Love, III, Michael John Halaiko, Bowles, Rice, McDavid, Graff & Love, P.L.L.C., Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Frank A. Balcar appeals the district court's orders denying his motion to remand, granting Defendants' motion to dismiss, and striking Balcar's response to Defendants' response to his motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Balcar v. Bell & Assoc. L.L.C., No. CA-02-2-5 (N.D.W. Va. Sept. 4 & 10, 2002). Although we deny Appellees' motion for fees and costs, we caution Balear that future appeals attempting to litigate the same issues adjudicated in this case may result in sanctions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.