Case Name: Matthew R. HIRT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2002-02-13
Citations: 68 S.W.3d 600
Docket Number: No. WD 59822
Parties: Matthew R. HIRT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: BEFORE: RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Presiding Judge, ROBERT G. ULRICH, Judge, and LISA WHITE HARDWICK, Judge.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 68
Pages: 600–601

Head Matter:
Matthew R. HIRT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 59822.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Feb. 13, 2002.
Mark A. Grothoff, Assistant Appellate Defender, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Nicole E. Gorovsky, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
BEFORE: RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Presiding Judge, ROBERT G. ULRICH, Judge, and LISA WHITE HARDWICK, Judge.

Opinion:
ORDER
Appellant Matthew Hirt appeals the denial of his motion under Rule 29.15 seeking to vacate his sentence upon a conviction of one count of leaving the scene of a motor vehicle accident (§ 557.060, RSMo). Said motion was denied by the motion court after an evidentiary hearing. Because we find no reversible error in the proceedings below, we affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no prec-edential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.