Case Name: Billy N. CULBERTSON, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Jim ROBERSON, Sheriff, Lonoke County Jail; Samantha Campbell, Jail Administrator, Lonoke County Jail; Christine Munnerlyn, Administrator, Lonoke County Jail, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-06-04
Citations: 508 F. App'x 582
Docket Number: No. 12-3133
Parties: Billy N. CULBERTSON, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Jim ROBERSON, Sheriff, Lonoke County Jail; Samantha Campbell, Jail Administrator, Lonoke County Jail; Christine Munnerlyn, Administrator, Lonoke County Jail, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before LOKEN, MELLOY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 508
Pages: 582–583

Head Matter:
Billy N. CULBERTSON, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Jim ROBERSON, Sheriff, Lonoke County Jail; Samantha Campbell, Jail Administrator, Lonoke County Jail; Christine Munnerlyn, Administrator, Lonoke County Jail, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 12-3133.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: May 23, 2013.
Filed: June 4, 2013.
Billy N. Culbertson, Brickeys, AR, pro se.
Robert L. Beard, Jr., Jason E. Owens, Geoffrey Thompson, Rainwater & Holt, argued, Little Rock, AR, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before LOKEN, MELLOY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Arkansas inmate Billy N. Culbertson appeals the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 damage action alleging deliberate indifference to his serious medical and mental health needs while incarcerated as a pretrial detainee at the Lonoke County Jail from September 2006 to January 2008. Following an evidentiary hearing on the claim that he was overmedicat-ed by jail staff under the supervision of the County Sheriff during part of that period, at which numerous witnesses including Culbertson and the defendant jailers testified, the magistrate judge issued proposed findings and recommendations concluding that Culbertson failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that defendants' actions in dispensing Culbertson's prescribed medications were taken with deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. After Culbertson filed procedural and substantive objections to the magistrate judge's recommendations, the district court entered an Order dismissing the complaint with prejudice, explaining:
After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts them in their entirety.
Culbertson appeals, raising the same issues asserted in his objections to the magistrate judge's proposed decision, and additional issues we decline to consider because they are raised for the first time on appeal. After careful review of the ev-identiary record properly reviewed de novo by the district court, we agree with the court's conclusion that Culbertson failed to prove his allegations of deliberate indifference to serious medical needs. Accordingly, we affirm.
. The Honorable Kristine G. Baker, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the Proposed Findings and Recommendation of the Honorable Jerome T. Kearney, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas,