Case Name: E. C. PECK, Appellant, v. O. A. STASSFORTH et al., Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1909-08-24
Citations: 156 Cal. 203
Docket Number: L. A. No. 2301
Parties: E. C. PECK, Appellant, v. O. A. STASSFORTH et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Reports
Volume: 156
Pages: 203–204

Head Matter:
[L. A. No. 2301.
Department Two.
August 24, 1909.]
E. C. PECK, Appellant, v. O. A. STASSFORTH et al., Respondents.
Street Assessment—Name of Street—Change of Name on Map.— Judgment and order affirmed on the authority of Peck v. Strassforth, ante, p. 201.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order refusing a new trial. George H. Hutton, Judge.
The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion in Peck v. Stassforth, ante, p. 201.
A. J. Sherer, and Edward Winterer, for Appellant.
Shankland & Chandler, for Respondents.

Opinion:
THE COURT.
For the reasons given in the opinion in E. C. Peck v. O. A. Stassforth et al, ante, p. 201, [103 Pac. 918], this day decided, the judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.