Case Name: James B. MITCHELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2001-01-12
Citations: 775 So. 2d 428
Docket Number: No. 5D00-1884
Parties: James B. MITCHELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: COBB, SAWAYA, and ORFINGER, R. B., JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 775
Pages: 428–428

Head Matter:
James B. MITCHELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D00-1884.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Jan. 12, 2001.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Rebecca M. Becker, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mary G. Jolley, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm Appellant's sentence as an habitual offender as such sentences are not affected by the Supreme Court's decision in Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000). An habitual offender sentence is not a guidelines sentence. See Ford v. State, 763 So.2d 1273 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).
AFFIRMED.
COBB, SAWAYA, and ORFINGER, R. B., JJ., concur.