Case Name: Joseph D. FARISH, Jr., as Administrator of the Estate of Joseph D. Farish, Sr., Deceased, and Joseph D. Farish, Jr., d/b/a Farish & Farish, a partnership, Appellants, v. BANKERS MULTIPLE LINE INSURANCE COMPANY, Rosemary Barkett, Ken Slinkman, Hugh R. Lindsey, et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1985-10-09
Citations: 476 So. 2d 300
Docket Number: No. 83-1828
Parties: Joseph D. FARISH, Jr., as Administrator of the Estate of Joseph D. Farish, Sr., Deceased, and Joseph D. Farish, Jr., d/b/a Farish & Farish, a partnership, Appellants, v. BANKERS MULTIPLE LINE INSURANCE COMPANY, Rosemary Barkett, Ken Slinkman, Hugh R. Lindsey, et al., Appellees.
Judges: SCHWARTZ, ALAN R.; HUBBART, PHILLIP A.; and JORGENSON, JAMES R., Associate Judges, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 476
Pages: 300–300

Head Matter:
Joseph D. FARISH, Jr., as Administrator of the Estate of Joseph D. Farish, Sr., Deceased, and Joseph D. Farish, Jr., d/b/a Farish & Farish, a partnership, Appellants, v. BANKERS MULTIPLE LINE INSURANCE COMPANY, Rosemary Barkett, Ken Slinkman, Hugh R. Lindsey, et al., Appellees.
No. 83-1828.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Oct. 9, 1985.
Douglas E. Thompson of Farish, Farish & Romani, West Palm Beach, for appellants.
Richard A. Kupfer of Cone, Wagner, Nu-gent, Johnson, Roth & Romano, P.A., and Pariente & Silber, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellees.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Contrary to the appellants' contentions, we conclude (a) that the trial court neither lacked jurisdiction, see Bailey v. Bailey, 392 So.2d 49 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), nor abused its discretion, see Williams v. Nussbaum, 419 So.2d 715 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), in permitting the purported partners of the plaintiff Farish to intervene as parties plaintiff in the litigation involved in Bankers Multiple Line Ins. Co. v. Farish, 464 So.2d 530 (Fla.1985); (b) that there was no harmful error in requiring that the percentage partnership share in the judgment asserted by the intervenors be escrowed in an interest bearing account pending determination of the merits of their claim.
Affirmed.
SCHWARTZ, ALAN R.; HUBBART, PHILLIP A.; and JORGENSON, JAMES R., Associate Judges, concur.