Case Name: The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Bies, Appellant
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1997-07-16
Citations: 79 Ohio St. 3d 192
Docket Number: No. 97-12
Parties: The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Bies, Appellant.
Judges: Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 79
Pages: 192–193

Head Matter:
The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Bies, Appellant.
[Cite as State v. Bies (1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 192.]
(No. 97-12
Submitted May 6, 1997
Decided July 16, 1997.)
Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and William E. Breyer, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
Hallowes, Allen & Haynes and S. Scott Haynes; and J. Joseph Bodine, Jr., Assistant State Public Defender, for appellant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying appellant's application for reopening for the same reasons articulated by the court of appeals. Appellant has offered no compelling justification why his application was filed beyond the time strictures of App. R. 26(B).
Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.