Case Name: Reggio Mattucci et al v. B. R. Sutliff
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1924-06-17
Citations: 2 Ohio Law Abs. 422
Docket Number: No. 18442
Parties: Reggio Mattucci et al v. B. R. Sutliff.
Judges: Robinson, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ., concur.’ Wanamaker, J., not participating.
Reporter: The Ohio Law Abstract
Volume: 2
Pages: 422–422

Head Matter:
No. 399
No. 18442
Reggio Mattucci et al v. B. R. Sutliff.
Error to the Court of Appeals of Belmont County.
297. CONTRACTS — Judgment of trial court on two causes of action, one for reformation of contract respecting sale of coal lands and the other for ’damages for false representations. Court of Appeals refused reformation and dismissed the appeal on second cause, and its action is sustained by Supreme Court.

Opinion:
JONES, J.
Plaintiff sued for damages ensuing from false representations made respecting two tracts of coal land, which defendants agreed to sell and convey to the plaintiff by a written contract. One of the tracts was unintentionally omitted from said contract, but on the following day defendant conveyed or caused to be conveyed both tracts to the plaintiff. Plaintiff's action included two causes of action, one seeking reformatiori of the contract so as to include the onfitted tract, and the other asking damages for false representations. The trial court reformed the contract and rendered judgment for damages. Defendants appealed to the Court of Appeals.
Held: Upon development of the foregoing-facts the Court of Appeals did not err in refusing reformation of the contract or in dismissing the appeal as to the second cause of action.
Judgment affirmed.
Robinson, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ., concur.' Wanamaker, J., not participating.