Case Name: Tania BAKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis E. WOOLARD, LCSWC-C; Mary Ellen Cahill, Intake Specialist; Evelyn Yap, LCSWC-C, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-05-30
Citations: 473 F. App'x 335
Docket Number: No. 12-1376
Parties: Tania BAKER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Louis E. WOOLARD, LCSWC-C; Mary Ellen Cahill, Intake Specialist; Evelyn Yap, LCSWC-C, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 473
Pages: 335–335

Head Matter:
Tania BAKER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Louis E. WOOLARD, LCSWC-C; Mary Ellen Cahill, Intake Specialist; Evelyn Yap, LCSWC-C, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 12-1376.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 24, 2012.
Decided: May 30, 2012.
Tania Baker, Appellant Pro Se.
Before MOTZ and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Tania Baker appeals the district court's order denying her motion for reconsideration under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Baker v. Woolard, No. 1:11-cv-02484-CCB (D.Md. Mar. 7, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.