Case Name: CHAMPION SPARK PLUG COMPANY, Appellant, v. The GYROMAT CORPORATION, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1981-01-06
Citations: 636 F.2d 907
Docket Number: No. 211, Docket 80-7516
Parties: CHAMPION SPARK PLUG COMPANY, Appellant, v. The GYROMAT CORPORATION, Appellee.
Judges: Before OAKES and MESKILL, Circuit Judges, and WERKER, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 636
Pages: 907–908

Head Matter:
CHAMPION SPARK PLUG COMPANY, Appellant, v. The GYROMAT CORPORATION, Appellee.
No. 211, Docket 80-7516.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued Dec. 1, 1980.
Decided Jan. 6, 1981.
Mark C. Schaffer, Emch, Schaffer, Schaub & Todd Co., L.P.A., Toledo, Ohio (John C. Vassil, Morgan, Finnegan, Pine, Foley & Lee, New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Fritz L. Schweitzer, Jr., New York City (Michael A. Cornman, Mandeville & Schweitzer, New York City, of counsel), for appellee.
Before OAKES and MESKILL, Circuit Judges, and WERKER, District Judge.
Of the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
We affirm on the memorandum opinion of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, Warren W. Eginton, Judge, 88 F.R.D. 526 (D.Conn.1980), declining to grant under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59 or 60(b)(2) a motion to reopen the trial proceedings on the basis of newly discovered evidence, filed following remand after Champion Spark Plug Co. v. Gyromat Corp., 603 F.2d 361 (2d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 916, 100 S.Ct. 1276, 63 L.Ed.2d 600 (1980).
Appellee's request for double costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1912 and Fed.R.App.P. 38 is denied.