Case Name: John J. O'NEILL, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Mary Frances O'NEILL, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1993-11-09
Citations: 864 S.W.2d 435
Docket Number: No. 62858
Parties: John J. O’NEILL, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Mary Frances O’NEILL, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 864
Pages: 435–436

Head Matter:
John J. O’NEILL, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Mary Frances O’NEILL, Respondent/Respondent.
No. 62858.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Nov. 9, 1993.
Richrd J. Burke, Jr., Padberg, McSwee-ney, Slater & Merz, St. Louis, for petitioner/appellant.
Jeffrey S. Scheckter, Sehecter & Watkins, Clayton, for respondent/respondent.
Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Husband appeals from the maintenance portion of a dissolution decree. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial and competent evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.-16(b).