Case Name: MURPHY, Respondent, v. MILLIKEN et al., Appellants
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1903-11-25
Citations: 84 N.Y.S. 1136
Docket Number: 
Parties: MURPHY, Respondent, v. MILLIKEN et al., Appellants.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 84
Pages: 1136–1136

Head Matter:
MURPHY, Respondent, v. MILLIKEN et al., Appellants.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
November 25, 1903.)
Action by Patrick Murphy against Edward F. Milliken and Foster Milliken.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The statement in the opinion that there was no evidence that Finck signaled at all was too broad. But that statement is not necessary to support the conclusion, reached. It is enough that there was no definite or satisfactory evidence that Finck signaled prematurely. Motion for reargument denied.