Case Name: Frederick J. PEET, Jr., Respondent, v. DUPONT SECURITIES GROUP, INC., Defendant, and Marquis Financial Services of Indiana d/b/a Marquis Financial Services, Inc., Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2008-08-19
Citations: 260 S.W.3d 433
Docket Number: No. ED 90212
Parties: Frederick J. PEET, Jr., Respondent, v. DUPONT SECURITIES GROUP, INC., Defendant, and Marquis Financial Services of Indiana d/b/a Marquis Financial Services, Inc., Appellant.
Judges: Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 260
Pages: 433–433

Head Matter:
Frederick J. PEET, Jr., Respondent, v. DUPONT SECURITIES GROUP, INC., Defendant, and Marquis Financial Services of Indiana d/b/a Marquis Financial Services, Inc., Appellant.
No. ED 90212.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Aug. 19, 2008.
Michael B. Katz, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Steven W. Koslovsky, Maryland Heights, MO, for Respondent.
Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Dupont Securities Group, Inc. and Marquis Financial Services of Indiana, Inc., d/b/a Marquis Financial Services, Inc. (hereinafter, "Appellant") appeal from the trial court's judgment denying Appellant's motion to set aside a default judgment. Appellant raises four points on appeal, challenging the validity of the trial court's judgment.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find no error. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16.