Case Name: Marvin Gene WHITE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2006-09-22
Citations: 939 So. 2d 1112
Docket Number: No. 5D06-1884
Parties: Marvin Gene WHITE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: THOMPSON, MONACO and LAWSON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 939
Pages: 1112–1112

Head Matter:
Marvin Gene WHITE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D06-1884.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Sept. 22, 2006.
Rehearing Denied Oct. 18, 2006.
Marvin G. White, Jasper, pro se.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, and Brigid E. Collins, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the order of the trial court denying the appellant's rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief without prejudice to his refiling a facially sufficient motion. Rather than refile his motion after correcting his deficiencies, the appellant chose to appeal. He may have been confused by the trial court's order that mistakenly referenced a necessity for him to comply with rule 3.850(b), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Nevertheless, the motion filed by the appellant did not contain the information required by rule 3.850(c), which was obviously what the trial court intended to say.
AFFIRMED.
THOMPSON, MONACO and LAWSON, JJ., concur.