Case Name: Christopher Michael WATKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. B.G. COMPTON, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-04-25
Citations: 126 F. App'x 621
Docket Number: No. 04-6943
Parties: Christopher Michael WATKINS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. B.G. COMPTON, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before TRAXLER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 126
Pages: 621–622

Head Matter:
Christopher Michael WATKINS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. B.G. COMPTON, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 04-6943.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 10, 2005.
Decided April 25, 2005.
Christopher Michael Watkins, Appellant pro se.
Before TRAXLER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
Christopher Michael Watkins, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Watkins v. Compton, No. CA-04-251-7 (W.D.Va., filed May 14, 2004; entered May 17, 2004); see also Pelissero v. Thompson, 170 F.3d 442, 445 (4th Cir.1999); Moscato v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 98 F.3d 757, 760 (3d Cir.1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED