Case Name: James A. POOLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2001-03-14
Citations: 794 So. 2d 623
Docket Number: No. 2D00-246
Parties: James A. POOLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SALCINES and STRINGER, JJ„ concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 794
Pages: 623–623

Head Matter:
James A. POOLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D00-246.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
March 14, 2001.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Allyn Giambalvo, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jenny S. Sieg, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appel-lee.

Opinion:
BLUE, Acting Chief Judge.
James A. Pooler argues that the trial court erred by sentencing him under the 1995 guidelines, which were declared unconstitutional in Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000), for offenses that occurred between October 1, 1995, and May 24, 1997, see Trapp v. State, 760 So.2d 924 (Fla.2000). Although the State concedes error, we conclude that Pooler has faded to preserve this issue pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(d). Accordingly, we affirm. Pooler may raise this issue in a motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a).
Affirmed.
SALCINES and STRINGER, JJ" concur.