Case Name: Town of East Hartford v. Ruth E. Cook
Court: Connecticut Appellate Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1988-12-05
Citations: 17 Conn. App. 813
Docket Number: 6412
Parties: Town of East Hartford v. Ruth E. Cook
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Appellate Reports
Volume: 17
Pages: 813–813

Head Matter:
Town of East Hartford v. Ruth E. Cook
(6412)
Spallone, Daly and Foti, Js.
Argued November 9
decision released December 5, 1988
Ruth E. Cook, pro se, the appellant (defendant).
David J. Wenc, assistant corporation counsel, with whom, on the brief, was Jose R. Ramirez, assistant corporation counsel, for the appellee (plaintiff).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The defendant has attacked the factual findings and the legal conclusions of the trial court. Our review of the record indicates no basis to support her averments of error. Practice Book § 4061.
There is no error.