Case Name: MATTIE STOUT, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. EDISON PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1912-06-20
Citations: 83 N.J.L. 639
Docket Number: 
Parties: MATTIE STOUT, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. EDISON PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 83
Pages: 639–639

Head Matter:
MATTIE STOUT, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. EDISON PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.
Submitted March 25, 1912
Decided June 20, 1912.
On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 53 Vroom 133.
Bor the plaintiff in error, William II. Morrow and Robert II. McCarter.
Bor the defendant in error, William C. Gebhardt.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Mr. Justice Yoorhees in that court.
For affirmance — Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Bogert, Ykedenwrgh, Yroom, Congdon, White, Treacy, JJ. 12.
For reversal — Kone.