Case Name: STATE OF FLORIDA, ex rel. THE CRUMMER COMPANY, a corporation organized and existing under the Laws of the State of Delaware, v. JAMES M. LEE, J. EDWIN LARSON, and J. TOM WATSON, as and constituting the Florida Securities Commission
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1943-10-29
Citations: 153 Fla. 642
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF FLORIDA, ex rel. THE CRUMMER COMPANY, a corporation organized and existing under the Laws of the State of Delaware, v. JAMES M. LEE, J. EDWIN LARSON, and J. TOM WATSON, as and constituting the Florida Securities Commission.
Judges: BUFORD, C. J., BROWN, CHAPMAN, THOMAS, ADAMS and SEBRING, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 153
Pages: 642–643

Head Matter:
STATE OF FLORIDA, ex rel. THE CRUMMER COMPANY, a corporation organized and existing under the Laws of the State of Delaware, v. JAMES M. LEE, J. EDWIN LARSON, and J. TOM WATSON, as and constituting the Florida Securities Commission.
15 So. (2nd) 442
June Term, 1943
October 29, 1943
En Banc
Rehearing Denied November 24, 1943
Hull, Landis, Graham & French, for relator.
J. Tom Watson, Attorney General, and Lewis Petteway, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Opinion:
TERRELL, J.:
This is a companion case to State of Florida, ex rel. Watson v. The Crummer Company, Fla. 15 So. (2nd) 441, decided this date. Here the Crummer Company seeks to coerce the Florida Securities Commission by mandamus to register it as a dealer in municipal securities as required by the Florida Securities Act, Section 517.16, Florida Statutes of 1941. In its return to the alternative writ, it is alleged that respondents denied relator's request for registration on the sole ground that it had violated the Florida Securities Act by entering into the contract with the City of Inverness, more specifically described in the companion case. The return is tested by a demurrer and a motion to strike designated paragraphs. The demurrer is sustained and the motion to strike is granted on authority of State of Florida, ex rel. Watson v. The Crummer Company, decided this date. Peremptory writ is granted.
It is so ordered.
BUFORD, C. J., BROWN, CHAPMAN, THOMAS, ADAMS and SEBRING, JJ., concur.