Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ruben Osbaldo CARMONA-BENAVIDEZ, also known as Ruben Osbaldo Carmona, also known as Ruben O. Carmona, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-08-21
Citations: 475 F. App'x 969
Docket Number: No. 11-41188
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ruben Osbaldo CARMONA-BENAVIDEZ, also known as Ruben Osbaldo Carmona, also known as Ruben O. Carmona, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before SMITH, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 475
Pages: 969–969

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ruben Osbaldo CARMONA-BENAVIDEZ, also known as Ruben Osbaldo Carmona, also known as Ruben O. Carmona, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-41188
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 21, 2012.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Jose Salvador Tellez, II, Esq., Law Office of Jose Salvador Tellez II, P.C., Laredo, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before SMITH, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The attorney appointed to represent Ruben Osbaldo Carmona-Benavidez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Carmona-Benavidez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.