Case Name: STATE OF NEW JERSEY AND BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONERS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF NEWARK, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1966-01-18
Citations: 90 N.J. Super. 68
Docket Number: 
Parties: STATE OF NEW JERSEY AND BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONERS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF NEWARK, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 90
Pages: 68–68

Head Matter:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY AND BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONERS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF NEWARK, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued January 11, 1966
Decided January 18, 1966.
Before Judges Goldmark, Poley and Collestek.
Mr. Joseph A. Hoffman, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellants (Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General, attorney).
Mr. William H. Walls argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Norman N. Schiff, Corporation Counsel, attorney; Mr. Joseph A. Ward, on the brief).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Crane in the Law Division, reported at 87 N. J. Super. 38 (Law Div. 1965).