Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Michael TODD, Appellant; Michael TODD, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1994-01-25
Citations: 868 S.W.2d 560
Docket Number: Nos. 60803, 63484
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Michael TODD, Appellant. Michael TODD, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 868
Pages: 560–560

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Michael TODD, Appellant. Michael TODD, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 60803, 63484.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Jan. 25, 1994.
Robert E. Steele, Jr., St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant, Michael Todd, appeals from his conviction, after a jury trial, of felony stealing. He was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to imprisonment for seven years. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion on defendant's direct appeal. The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).