Case Name: BRYANT v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1927-03-09
Citations: 294 S.W. 214
Docket Number: No. 10767
Parties: BRYANT v. STATE.
Judges: MORROW, P. J., not sitting.
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 294
Pages: 214–215

Head Matter:
BRYANT v. STATE.
(No. 10767.)
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
March 9, 1927.
Rehearing Denied May 11, 1927.
E. T. Miller, of Amarillo, for appellant.
Sam D. Stinson, State’s Atty., and Rob.t. M. Lyles, Asst. State’s Atty., both of Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
LATTIMORE, J.
Conviction for transportation of intoxicating liquor; punishment, one year in the penitentiary.
Our attention is called by the state's attorney to the fact that the, statement of facts was filed ten days after the expiration of the time allowed by statute for filing same. It is urged that we cannot consider same. The contention of the state appears in accord with the 'facts.
Six bills of exception appear in the transcript, each of which has been examined, but the materiality and propriety of the matter contained in each cannot be appraised by us, in the absence of a statement of facts. The bills are qualified in each instance and pre sent no error. One of said bills asserts that a juror was taken upon the case who expressed prejudice against appellant after his selection on the jury. If any facts were heard by the court relating to this matter when it came before him in connection with the motion for new trial, same were in no way preserved or brought here.
Binding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.