Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Maurilio PRIETO-RUBI, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-12-24
Citations: 548 F. App'x 945
Docket Number: No. 13-7356
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Maurilio PRIETO-RUBI, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 548
Pages: 945–945

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Maurilio PRIETO-RUBI, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-7356.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Dee. 19, 2013.
Decided: Dec. 24, 2013.
Maurilio Prieto-Rubi, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Mitchell Huber, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Maurilio Prieto-Rubi appeals the district court's order denying his petition for writ of error coram nobis because he remains in federal custody. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Prieto-Rubi's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.