Case Name: Edward LAMB et al., Appellants, v. Rosel H. HYDE et al., Individually and as Members of the Federal Communications Commission, Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1955-05-26
Citations: 223 F.2d 646
Docket Number: No. 12308
Parties: Edward LAMB et al., Appellants, v. Rosel H. HYDE et al., Individually and as Members of the Federal Communications Commission, Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 223
Pages: 646–646

Head Matter:
Edward LAMB et al., Appellants, v. Rosel H. HYDE et al., Individually and as Members of the Federal Communications Commission, Appellees.
No. 12308.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued May 11, 1955.
Decided May 26, 1955.
Mr. Russell Morton Brown, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. J. Howard McGrath and Robert J. Norvell, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellants.
Mr. Warren D. Quenstedt, Atty. Federal Communications Commission, with whom Messrs. Warren E. Baker, Gen. Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, J. Smith Henley, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, Harrison, Ark., and Stanley S. Neustadt, Atty., Federal Communications Commission, New York City, were on the brief for appellees.
Mr. Richard A. Solomon, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, also entered an appearance for appellees.
Before WILBUR K. MILLER, BAZE-LON and FAHY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from an order of the District Court denying the appellants' motion for a preliminary injunction and granting the appellees' motion to dismiss. We affirm on the ground that appellants have failed to exhaust the prescribed administrative remedy. Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Co., 1938, 303 U.S. 41, 50-51, 58 S.Ct. 459, 82 L.Ed. 638.
Affirmed.