Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Isidro Giovanni RESTREPO-PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-01-22
Citations: 319 F. App'x 487
Docket Number: No. 08-10189
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Isidro Giovanni RESTREPO-PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: O’SCANNLAIN, BYBEE, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 319
Pages: 487–487

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Isidro Giovanni RESTREPO-PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 08-10189.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 13, 2009.
Filed Jan. 22, 2009.
Karen S. McDonald, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Daniel L. Kaplan, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, BYBEE, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Isidro Giovanni Restrepo-Perez appeals from the 15-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm the district court.
Restrepo-Perez contends that his sentence is unreasonable because the district court placed undue emphasis on the advisory Sentencing Guidelines, failed to undertake an independent sentencing analysis, and did not adequately explain its reasons for rejecting his request for a downward departure or variance. These contentions lack merit. See United States v. Blixt, 548 F.3d 882, 891 n. 4 (9th Cir.2008); see also United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 994-95 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.