Case Name: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Appellant, v. Manuel A. VIDAL, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2015-11-18
Citations: 178 So. 3d 961
Docket Number: No. 3D14-1008
Parties: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Appellant, v. Manuel A. VIDAL, Appellee.
Judges: Before EMAS, FERNANDEZ and ' SCALES, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 178
Pages: 961–961

Head Matter:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Appellant, v. Manuel A. VIDAL, Appellee.
No. 3D14-1008.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 18, 2015.
Wm. David Newman, Jr., Fort Lauder-dale, for appellant.
Michael Schiffrin; Ross & Girten and Lauri Waldman Ross, for appellee.
Before EMAS, FERNANDEZ and ' SCALES, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Bank of America, N.A. appeals an order denying its motion to vacate a voluntary dismissal of its foreclosure complaint against Manuel and Suzanne Vidal. Upon our review of the record below, it is apparent that the trial court concluded it was without jurisdiction to consider the motion. This was an erroneous conclusion, and we therefore reverse and, remand. See Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. Haecherl, 56 So.3d 892 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). We express no opinion on the legal sufficiency or the merits of the motion to vacate.
Reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
. We review de novo the trial court's legal determination that it was without jurisdiction to consider the motion to vacate. See Southern Baptist Hosp. of Fla., Inc. v. Welker, 908 So.2d 317 (Fla.2005); Nissen v. Cortez Moreno, 10 So.3d 1110 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009).