Case Name: In the Matter of 400 East 64/65th Street Block Association et al., Petitioners, and Coalition to Save City and Suburban Housing, Inc., et al., Respondents, v. City of New York et al., Appellants, and Kalikow 78/79 Company, Intervenor-Appellant, et al., Respondent
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1992-12-16
Citations: 81 N.Y.2d 736
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of 400 East 64/65th Street Block Association et al., Petitioners, and Coalition to Save City and Suburban Housing, Inc., et al., Respondents, v City of New York et al., Appellants, and Kalikow 78/79 Company, Intervenor-Appellant, et al., Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 81
Pages: 736–737

Head Matter:
In the Matter of 400 East 64/65th Street Block Association et al., Petitioners, and Coalition to Save City and Suburban Housing, Inc., et al., Respondents, v City of New York et al., Appellants, and Kalikow 78/79 Company, Intervenor-Appellant, et al., Respondent.
Submitted October 19, 1992;
decided December 16, 1992

Opinion:
Motions for leave to appeal denied. The Court of Appeals restates the rule that denial of a motion for leave to appeal is not equivalent to an affirmance and has no precedential value (see, e.g., Matter of Marchant v Mead-Morrison Mfg. Co., 252 NY 284, 297-298 [Cardozo, Ch. J.]; Estate of Berwick v State of New York, 76 NY2d 884).