Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William A. WHITE Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-01-11
Citations: 708 F. App'x 130
Docket Number: No. 17-6879
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William A. WHITE Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before MOTZ, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 708
Pages: 130–131

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William A. WHITE Defendant-Appellant.
No. 17-6879
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: December 21, 2017
Decided: January 11, 2018
William A. White, Appellant Pro Se. C. Patrick Hogeboom, III, Assistant United States Attorney, Laura Day Rottenborn, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Ap-pellee.
Before MOTZ, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
William A. White appeals the district court's order denying his second motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. White, No. 7:13-cr-00013-GEC-1, 2017 WL 2378018 (W.D. Va. Conrad, J., May 31, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED