Case Name: Charles R. LIVECCHI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CONTINENTAL SECURITIES CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, U.S. Department Of Housing and Urban Development, Rochester Housing Authority, Defendants
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2004-06-10
Citations: 100 F. App'x 860
Docket Number: No. 03-6155
Parties: Charles R. LIVECCHI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CONTINENTAL SECURITIES CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, U.S. Department Of Housing and Urban Development, Rochester Housing Authority, Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 100
Pages: 860–861

Head Matter:
Charles R. LIVECCHI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CONTINENTAL SECURITIES CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, U.S. Department Of Housing and Urban Development, Rochester Housing Authority, Defendants.
No. 03-6155.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
June 10, 2004.
Charles R. Livecehi, Rochester, NY, for Appellant, pro se.
David G. Linger, Hancock & Estabrook, LLP, (Michael J. Sciotti, on the brief), Syracuse, NY, for Appellee.
Present: WALKER, Chief Judge, WINTER, and JACOBS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
SUMMARY ORDER
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the appeal be and it hereby is DISMISSED for lack of appellate jurisdiction.
Plaintiff-appellant Charles Livecehi appeals from a July 1, 2003 order of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (David G. Larimer, District Judge) granting defendant-appellee Continental Securities Corporation's motion for summary judgment on Liveechi's claims of discriminatory conduct and breach of contract. The case remains pending against defendants the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development and the Rochester Housing Authority.
Absent an express direction for the entry of judgment against one party, an order by a district court that "adjudicates fewer than all the claims" in a case is not a final order and is not immediately appeal-able. Ruffolo v. Oppenheimer & Co., 949 F.2d 33, 35-36 (2d Cir.1991); see 28 U.S.C. § 1291, 1292(a)-(b); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b).
No such direction having been made here, Livecchi's appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of appellate jurisdiction.
. The caption is hereby amended to reflect that defendants, the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development and the Rochester Housing Authority, are not parties to this appeal.