Case Name: C. J. D. RUDOLPH and Irma M. Rudolph, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1961-06-27
Citations: 291 F.2d 841
Docket Number: No. 18788
Parties: C. J. D. RUDOLPH and Irma M. Rudolph, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 291
Pages: 841–845

Head Matter:
C. J. D. RUDOLPH and Irma M. Rudolph, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 18788.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
June 27, 1961.
Rehearing Denied July 28, 1961.
Richard A. Freling, B. Thomas McElroy, Felix Atwood, Dallas, Tex., for appellants.
Meyer Rothwacks, Lee A. Jackson, Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., William B. West, III, U. S. Atty., Fort Worth, Tex., W. E. Smith, Asst. U. S. Atty., Dallas, Tex., Abbott M. Sellers, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., I. Henry Kutz, Norman H. Wolfe, Attys., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Before JONES and BROWN, Circuit Judges, and DE YANE, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The facts are set forth in the opinion of the district court. Rudolph v. United States, 189 F.Supp. 2. The applicable law is to be found in Patterson v. Thomas, 289 F.2d 108, decided by this Court on March 16, 1961. No factual differences call for the application of a different rule or the reaching of a different result than in Patterson v. Thomas. The judgment of the district court is
Affirmed.