Case Name: Anthony CHAVIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2017-01-25
Citations: 208 So. 3d 833
Docket Number: No. 3D15-2294
Parties: Anthony CHAVIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before ROTHENBERG, LAGOA, and LOGUE, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 208
Pages: 833–833

Head Matter:
Anthony CHAVIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D15-2294
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Opinion filed January 25, 2017.
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Stephen J. Weinbaum, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jeffrey R. Geldens, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before ROTHENBERG, LAGOA, and LOGUE, JJ.

Opinion:
LOGUE, J.
Affirmed. See Lynch v. State, 293 So.2d 44, 45 (Fla. 1974) ("A defendant, in moving for a judgment of acquittal, admits not only the facts stated in the evidence adduced, but also admits every conclusion favorable to the adverse party that a jury might fairly and reasonably infer from the evidence. The courts should not grant a motion for judgment of acquittal unless the evidence is such that no view which the jury may lawfully take of it favorable to the opposite party can be sustained under the law.").