Case Name: David R. POSEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2002-07-11
Citations: 823 So. 2d 178
Docket Number: No. 1D01-1443
Parties: David R. POSEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: BENTON and VAN NORTWICK, JJ.,' CONCUR; BOOTH, J„ DISSENTS IN PART AND CONCURS IN PART WITH OPINION.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 823
Pages: 178–180

Head Matter:
David R. POSEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D01-1443.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
July 11, 2002.
Rehearing Denied Aug. 9, 2002.
Robert Rand, Esquire, Tallahassee and Steven L. Seliger, Esquire of Garcia and Seliger, Quincy, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Sherri T. Rollison, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm David R. Posey's conviction for robbery with a firearm but reverse his convictions for kidnapping and remand for resentencing. See Faison v. State, 426 So.2d 963, 965 (Fla.1983). Compare Berry v. State, 668 So.2d 967, 969 (Fla.1996) ("[TJhere can be no kidnapping where the only confinement involved is the sort that, though not necessary to the underlying felony, is likely to naturally accompany it. For example, . if the robbers had moved the victims to a different room in the apartment, closed the door, and ordered them not to come out, the kidnapping conviction could not stand"), with Ferguson v. State, 533 So.2d 763, 764 (Fla.1988) (holding that asportation after the robbery was completed was punishable separately as kidnapping).
BENTON and VAN NORTWICK, JJ.,' CONCUR; BOOTH, J" DISSENTS IN PART AND CONCURS IN PART WITH OPINION.