Case Name: Carl Schefrin, respondent, v. Philip Wilensky et al., appellants
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1921-06-20
Citations: 92 N.J. Eq. 705
Docket Number: 
Parties: Carl Schefrin, respondent, v. Philip Wilensky et al., appellants.
Judges: For affirmance—The Ci-iie,e-Justice, Swayzb, Trenoi-iard, Bergen, Minturn, Tyalisch, Black, PIeppeniieimer, Williams, Gardner—10.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 92
Pages: 705–705

Head Matter:
Carl Schefrin, respondent, v. Philip Wilensky et al., appellants.
[Decided June 20th, 1921.]
On appeal from a decree of tlie court of chancery.
Messrs. Weinberger <£• Weinberger, for the respondent.
Mr. George G. Tennant and Messrs. Sullivan & Sullivan, for the appellants.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis, whose opinion is reported in 92 N. J. Eq. 109.
For affirmance—The Ci-iie,e-Justice, Swayzb, Trenoi-iard, Bergen, Minturn, Tyalisch, Black, PIeppeniieimer, Williams, Gardner—10.
For reversal—Parker, Katzenbacii, White—3.