Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Francisco Noe VILLELA-RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-06-20
Citations: 691 F. App'x 167
Docket Number: No. 16-41352 Conference Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Francisco Noe VILLELA-RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 691
Pages: 167–167

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Francisco Noe VILLELA-RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant
No. 16-41352 Conference Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed June 20, 2017
Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Francisco Noe Villela-Ramirez, Pro Se
Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Francisco Noe Villela-Ra-mirez has moved, for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Villela-Ramirez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivo-lous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cíe. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir, R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R, 47.5,4.