Case Name: SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 3, TOWNSHIP 30, RANGE 14, SCOTT COUNTY, Respondent, v. J. R. YOUNG et al., Appellants
Court: St. Louis Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1912-02-06
Citations: 163 Mo. App. 526
Docket Number: 
Parties: SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 3, TOWNSHIP 30, RANGE 14, SCOTT COUNTY, Respondent, v. J. R. YOUNG et al., Appellants.
Judges: All concur.
Reporter: Missouri Appeal Reports
Volume: 163
Pages: 526–527

Head Matter:
SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 3, TOWNSHIP 30, RANGE 14, SCOTT COUNTY, Respondent, v. J. R. YOUNG et al., Appellants.
St. Louis Court of Appeals,
February 6, 1912.
The opinion of the Springfield Court of Appeals in this case (152 Mo. App. 304) is adopted as the opinion of the court.
Appeal from Scott Cirenit Court. — Hon. Henry C. Riley, Judge.
Affirmed.
J. R. Young for appellants.
James A. Finch for respondent.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The appeal in this case was prosecuted to this court, but was thereafter transferred by it to the Springfield Court of Appeals under the provisions of the act of the Legislature, approved June 12, 1909. [See Laws of Missouri, 1909, p. 396; see, also, Sec. 3939, R. S. 1909.] In due time the cause was disposed of by the Springfield Court of Appeals through an opinion prepared by Judge Gray of that court, as will appear by reference to School District No. 3, Scott County, v. J. R. Young et al., 152 Mo. App. 394, 133 S. W. 143. Subsequently, the Supreme Court declared the said legislative act, which purported to authorize the transfer of cases from this court to the Springfield Court, to be unconstitutional. The cause was thereafter transferred by the Springfield Court of Appeals to this court on the theory that the jurisdiction of the appeal continued to reside here and the proceedings had in the Springfield Court with reference thereto were coram non judice.
The case has been argued and submitted here and duly considered. Upon reading the record and considering the arguments, we are persuaded that the opinion of the Springfield Court, above referred to, properly disposes of the controversy, and it is adopted as the opinion of this court. For the reasons given in that opinion the judgment should be affirmed. It is so ordered.
All concur.