Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Juan ARELLANO-OCHOA, Defendant - Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-07-22
Citations: 329 F. App'x 163
Docket Number: No. 06-30052
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Juan ARELLANO-OCHOA, Defendant — Appellant.
Judges: Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 329
Pages: 163–163

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Juan ARELLANO-OCHOA, Defendant — Appellant.
No. 06-30052.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 14, 2009.
Filed July 22, 2009.
Lori Harper Suek, Esq., USBI-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Billings, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Evangelo Arvanetes, Esq., FDMT-Fed-eral Defenders of Montana, Great Falls, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Juan Arellano-Ochoa appeals from the 87-month sentence imposed following his jury-trial conviction for distribution of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Arellano-Ochoa contends that his sentence is unreasonable because the district court failed to adequately consider all of the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), and that his sentence is excessive in light of his mitigating circumstances. The district court did not procedurally err and Arellano-Ochoa's sentence is substantively reasonable. See United States v. Stoterau, 524 F.3d 988, 999-1002 (9th Cir.2008).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.