Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Robert ERSKINE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2018-02-27
Citations: 713 F. App'x 997
Docket Number: No. 16-11665 Non-Argument Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Robert ERSKINE, Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before WILSON, MARTIN and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 713
Pages: 997–998

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Robert ERSKINE, Defendant-Appellant
No. 16-11665 Non-Argument Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
(February 27, 2018)
Steven E. Butler, Adara W. Overstreet, Kenyen Ray Brown, Maria E. Murphy, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Mobile, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Carlos Alfredo Williams, Federal Defender’s Office, Mobile, AL, for Defendant-Appellant
Michael Robert Erskine, Pro Se
Before WILSON, MARTIN and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Kristen Gartman Rogers, appointed counsel for Michael Erskine in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Erskine and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Erskine's convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.