Case Name: Dinh TRAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COTY INC., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-08-01
Citations: 474 F. App'x 96
Docket Number: No. 12-1422
Parties: Dinh TRAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COTY INC., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 474
Pages: 96–96

Head Matter:
Dinh TRAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COTY INC., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 12-1422.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 25, 2012.
Decided: Aug. 1, 2012.
Dinh Tran, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Scott Joyner, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, PC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Dinh Tran appeals the district court's order denying his motions for reconsideration of the denial of his complaint alleging discrimination and retaliation. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tran v. Coty, Inc., No. 5:10-cv-00431-H (E.D.N.C. Mar. 13, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.