Case Name: Pellegrino Di Leo, Administrator, vs. Filippo Catanzaro et al.
Court: Connecticut Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1921-11-30
Citations: 96 Conn. 725
Docket Number: 
Parties: Pellegrino Di Leo, Administrator, vs. Filippo Catanzaro et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Reports
Volume: 96
Pages: 725–725

Head Matter:
Pellegrino Di Leo, Administrator, vs. Filippo Catanzaro et al.
Third Judicial District.
Submitted on briefs October 26th
decided November 30th, 1921.
Action to recover damages for the death of the plaintiff’s decedent, alleged to have been caused by the defendant’s negligence, brought to and tried by the Superior Court in New Haven County, Banks, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the plaintiff for $3,500, and appeal by defendant Filippo Catanzaro.
No error.
Nathaniel R. Bronson, Lawrence L. Lewis and Charles E. Hart, Jr., for the appellant (defendant Filippo Catanzaro).
Francis P. Guilfoile, for the appellee (plaintiff).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Examination of the evidence shows that the motion to correct the finding is almost in its entirety wholly without merit; the rest of the motion is without significance and, if granted, could not affect the questions of law involved in the appeal. Unless the finding be corrected the claimed errors of law, as the appellant concedes, cannot be successfully pursued.
There is no error.