Case Name: Solomon H. Shapiro, Respondent, v. Charles Punia et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, et al., Defendant. Louis Sunshine et al., Third-Party Defendants. (Action No. 1.); Samuel Trayman, Appellant, v. William Marx et al., Respondents and Third-Party Plaintiffs, et al., Defendant. Louis Sunshine et al., Third-Party Defendants. (Action No. 2.)
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1955-10-11
Citations: 286 A.D. 999
Docket Number: 
Parties: Solomon H. Shapiro, Respondent, v. Charles Punia et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, et al., Defendant. Louis Sunshine et al., Third-Party Defendants. (Action No. 1.) Samuel Trayman, Appellant, v. William Marx et al., Respondents and Third-Party Plaintiffs, et al., Defendant. Louis Sunshine et al., Third-Party Defendants. (Action No. 2.)
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 286
Pages: 999–999

Head Matter:
Solomon H. Shapiro, Respondent, v. Charles Punia et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, et al., Defendant. Louis Sunshine et al., Third-Party Defendants. (Action No. 1.) Samuel Trayman, Appellant, v. William Marx et al., Respondents and Third-Party Plaintiffs, et al., Defendant. Louis Sunshine et al., Third-Party Defendants. (Action No. 2.)

Opinion:
Concur — Peck, P. J., Breitel, Bastow, Rabin and Cox, JJ. [See post, p. 1090.]