Case Name: Walter Lee PEARCE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-04-15
Citations: 617 So. 2d 1057
Docket Number: No. 80379
Parties: Walter Lee PEARCE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Judges: BARKETT, C.J., and McDONALD, SHAW, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur. .
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 617
Pages: 1057–1058

Head Matter:
Walter Lee PEARCE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 80379.
Supreme Court of Florida.
April 15, 1993.
Walter Lee Pearce, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Peggy A. Quince and Donna A. Provonsha-Lentz, Asst. Attys. Gen., Tampa, for respondent.

Opinion:
OVERTON, Justice.
We have for review Pearce v. State, 603 So.2d 1282 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), in which the district court addressed the same question we recently answered in State v. Johnson, 616 So.2d 1 (Fla.1993). In accordance with our decision in Johnson, we quash the decision of the district court in the instant case and remand this cause for resentencing.
It is so ordered.
BARKETT, C.J., and McDONALD, SHAW, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur. .
. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.