Case Name: B. F. BASS v. Edna Pearl BAILEY
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1949-01-18
Citations: 172 F.2d 212
Docket Number: No. 12395
Parties: B. F. BASS v. Edna Pearl BAILEY.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 172
Pages: 212–212

Head Matter:
B. F. BASS v. Edna Pearl BAILEY.
No. 12395.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
Jan. 18, 1949.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 28, 1949.
Dwight Whitwell and Roland Boyd, both of McKinney, Tex., for appellant.
Carlisle Blalock, of Dallas, Tex., for appellee.
Before HUTCHESON, SIBLEY, and McCORD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.
This record is identical with that in Bass v. Hoagland, 5 Cir., 172 F.2d 205, this day decided, except that the plaintiff in the judgment here sued on is named Edna Pearl Bailey and the amount -she sued for and recovered in the Kansas court was $15,475. Everything we said in the opinion in Hoagland's case exactly applies here. For the reasons therein stated the judgment appealed from is set aside and the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this court.
Reversed and remanded.