Case Name: State, ex rel. Gouge, v. Stuard
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1992-03-05
Citations: 63 Ohio St. 3d 1421
Docket Number: 92-389
Parties: State, ex rel. Gouge, v. Stuard.
Judges: Sweeney and H. Brown, JJ., dissent.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 63
Pages: 1421–1421

Head Matter:
92-389.
State, ex rel. Gouge, v. Stuard.

Opinion:
In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relator's motion for an alternative writ,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that an alternative writ of mandamus be, and the same is hereby, granted, effective March 4, 1992.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that respondents show cause on or before March 24, 1992, why the writ of mandamus should not be granted.
Sweeney and H. Brown, JJ., dissent.