Case Name: Mary T. Heltz, Appellant, v. Bruce S. Barratt et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2014-12-17
Citations: 24 N.Y.3d 1185
Docket Number: 
Parties: Mary T. Heltz, Appellant, v Bruce S. Barratt et al., Respondents.
Judges: Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam.
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 24
Pages: 1185–1187

Head Matter:
[27 NE3d 471, 3 NYS3d 757]
Mary T. Heltz, Appellant, v Bruce S. Barratt et al., Respondents.
Decided December 17, 2014
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Personius Melber LLP, Buffalo (Scott R. Hapeman of counsel), for appellant.
Barth Sullivan Behr, Buffalo (Andrew J. Kowalewski of counsel), for respondents.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order af firmed, with costs. Plaintiff failed to produce admissible evidence raising a triable issue of fact concerning whether defendant Barratt had an opportunity to avoid the collision.
Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam.