Case Name: In the Matter of Rosetta Schuster, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. ROSETTA SCHUSTER, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1992-04-08
Citations: 112 Or. App. 317
Docket Number: 9109-97022; CA A71597
Parties: In the Matter of Rosetta Schuster, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. ROSETTA SCHUSTER, Appellant.
Judges: Before Joseph, Chief Judge, and Rossman and De Muniz, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 112
Pages: 317–318

Head Matter:
Submitted on record and briefs March 13,
reversed April 8, 1992
In the Matter of Rosetta Schuster, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. ROSETTA SCHUSTER, Appellant.
(9109-97022; CA A71597)
829 P2d 93
Gregg T. Sylvester, Portland, filed the brief for appellant.
Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Mary H. Williams, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Joseph, Chief Judge, and Rossman and De Muniz, Judges.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
In this mental commitment case, the state concedes that the trial court erred in finding appellant to be a mentally ill person within the meaning of ORS 426.005(2). Nonetheless, we are required to conduct a de novo review.
On the basis of that review, we agree with the state: "This is one of those cases where the relationship between [the] appellant's medical condition and her emotional lability[ ] cannot be gleaned from [the] record."
Reversed.
Yes, lability, or the state of being labile: "[R]eadily or continually undergoing chemical or physical or biological change or breakdown." Webster's Third New International Dictionary 1259 (unabridged 1971).