Case Name: LAKE SHORE ESTATES, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. DENVILLE TOWNSHIP PLANNING BOARD, MAYOR AND MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF THE TOWNSHIP OF DENVILLE, AND TOWNSHIP OF DENVILLE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1992-04-16
Citations: 127 N.J. 394
Docket Number: 
Parties: LAKE SHORE ESTATES, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. DENVILLE TOWNSHIP PLANNING BOARD, MAYOR AND MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF THE TOWNSHIP OF DENVILLE, AND TOWNSHIP OF DENVILLE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 127
Pages: 394–400

Head Matter:
605 A.2d 1073
LAKE SHORE ESTATES, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. DENVILLE TOWNSHIP PLANNING BOARD, MAYOR AND MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF THE TOWNSHIP OF DENVILLE, AND TOWNSHIP OF DENVILLE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Argued January 6, 1992
Decided April 16, 1992.
Lawrence S. Berger argued the cause for appellant (Berger & Bornstein, attorneys; Bernd E. Hefele and Robert A. Bornstein, on the brief).
Joel A. Murphy argued the cause for respondents (Murphy and Kumos, attorneys).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 255 N.J.Super. 580, 605 A.2d 1106 (1991).