Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN and HARTFORD RAILROAD COMPANY, Tri-Continental Financial Corporation, A. C. Allyn and Company, Incorporated, American Transportation Enterprises, Inc., Equitable Securities Corporation, Carl M. Loeb, Rhoades & Co., The Robinson-Humphrey Company, Inc., and John W. Clarke & Co., Defendants
Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1959-06-18
Citations: 175 F. Supp. 873
Docket Number: 
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN and HARTFORD RAILROAD COMPANY, Tri-Continental Financial Corporation, A. C. Allyn and Company, Incorporated, American Transportation Enterprises, Inc., Equitable Securities Corporation, Carl M. Loeb, Rhoades & Co., The Robinson-Humphrey Company, Inc., and John W. Clarke & Co., Defendants.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Supplement
Volume: 175
Pages: 873–873

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN and HARTFORD RAILROAD COMPANY, Tri-Continental Financial Corporation, A. C. Allyn and Company, Incorporated, American Transportation Enterprises, Inc., Equitable Securities Corporation, Carl M. Loeb, Rhoades & Co., The Robinson-Humphrey Company, Inc., and John W. Clarke & Co., Defendants.
United States District Court S. D. New York.
June 18, 1959.
S. Hazard Gillespie, Jr., U. S. Atty. for the Southern District of New York, New York City, for the United States, by Morton S. Robson, Asst. U. S. Atty., New York City.
William T. Griffin, New York City, for New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co.

Opinion:
McGOHEY, District Judge.
This unusual motion was, as appears on p. 13 of the transcript of the argument on file, joined in by the defendant New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company.
It is conceded, and I independently find, that there is no genuine dispute of fact. The facts and the issue of law raised by the motion are precisely those set forth and decided on a motion by other defendants in this case for summary judgment in their favor, which was granted. D.C., 170 F.Supp. 562. For the reasons there stated, the instant joint motion by the plaintiff and the defendant New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company for summary judgment in favor of the latter, is herewith granted.
So ordered.