Case Name: Bray v. Porterfield & Brown
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1922-10-03
Citations: 29 Ga. App. 135
Docket Number: 13231
Parties: Bray v. Porterfield & Brown.
Judges: .Broyles, O. J., and Luhe, J., concur.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 29
Pages: 135–135

Head Matter:
13231.
Bray v. Porterfield & Brown.
Decided October 3, 1922.
Complaint; from city court of Lexington-—-Judge Joel Cloud. December 22, 1921.
W. W. Armistead, Hamilton McWhorter Jr., for plaintiff in error.
Gordon & Gordon, contra.

Opinion:
Bloodwokth, J.
As the motion for a new trial in this ease contains only the usual general grounds, the only question for determination by this court is whether or not the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict. There is some evidence to support the finding of the jury, and " a verdict supported by any evidence and approved by the trial judge cannot be set aside by this court because of alleged insufficiency of evidence." Townsend v. State, 26 Ga. App. 82 (105 S. E. 377).
Judgment affirmed.
.Broyles, O. J., and Luhe, J., concur.