Case Name: Franklin HODGE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2015-11-19
Citations: 180 So. 3d 184
Docket Number: No. 1D15-2306
Parties: Franklin HODGE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: LEWIS and ROWE, JJ., concur; THOMAS, J., concurs in Result Only.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 180
Pages: 184–185

Head Matter:
Franklin HODGE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 1D15-2306.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nov. 19, 2015.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 5, 2016.
Franklin Hodge, pro se, Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Matthew Pavese, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the denial of the appellant's rule 3.800(a) motion challenging his VCC sentences on the ground that the convictions were not sequential, see Bover v. State, 797 So.2d 1246, 1250 (Fla.2001) (stating that under § 775.084(5), "although the sentencing for separate convictions arising out of unrelated crimes can take place on the same day, the sentences cannot be part of the same sentencing proceeding"), as it is not apparent from the face of the record before this Court whether the appellant was sentenced for the predicate convictions at issue during the same sentencing proceeding. Cf. Poole v. State, 659 So.2d 309 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) ("As a general rule, a post-conviction issue that requires an evidentiary hearing must be resolved under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850."). We note that the de nial is without prejudice to the appellant filing a timely and facially sufficient motion pursuant to rule 3.850 raising the same claim.
AFFIRMED.
LEWIS and ROWE, JJ., concur; THOMAS, J., concurs in Result Only.