Case Name: John FURGESS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-02-28
Citations: 220 F. App'x 186
Docket Number: No. 06-2272
Parties: John FURGESS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INCORPORATED, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 220
Pages: 186–186

Head Matter:
John FURGESS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INCORPORATED, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 06-2272.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 22, 2007.
Decided: Feb. 28, 2007.
John Furgess, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Susan Pedrick McWilliams, James Chris Leventis, Jr., Nexsen Pruet, Columbia, South Carolina; Glen G. Patton, Alston & Bird, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee.
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
John Furgess, Jr. appeals the district court's order adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment in favor of United Parcel Service, Inc. on Furgess's claim of race discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Furgess v. United Parcel Service, Inc., No. 3:05-cv-01206-CMC, 2006 WL 3192542 (D.S.C. Nov. 1, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.