Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Marcantonio Orlandino, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1938-03-18
Citations: 254 A.D. 578
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Marcantonio Orlandino, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 254
Pages: 578–579

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Marcantonio Orlandino, Appellant.

Opinion:
Judgment of the County Court of Nassau county convicting the defendant of the crime of robbery in the second degree, and orders, affirmed. The proof in the ease, especially the testimony of Teresa Franzese, contains such other evidence as tends to connect the defendant with the commission of the crime as required by section 399 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell and Adel, JJ., concur; Taylor and Close, JJ., dissent and vote for reversal and a new trial, with the following memorandum: Accepting the testimony of Mrs. Franzese as true, it is not " such other evidence as tends to connect the defendant with the commission of the crime." (Code Grim. Proe, § 399.) The strongest inference that can be drawn from the testimony of Mrs. Franzese is that the appellant had knowledge or information about the crime which would be detrimental to those then under arrest, charged with the crime. Such information might have been acquired innocently and subsequent to the commission of the crime. When evidence can be construed as pointing toward the accused's innocence as well as toward his guilt, the inference of innocence must be drawn. |(Matter of Irving, 198 App. Div. 414,416.)