Case Name: In re E.A. R.A., Respondent v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Public Welfare and Wyoming County Human Services, Intervenor, Petitioners
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2012-10-15
Citations: 55 A.3d 1048
Docket Number: 
Parties: In re E.A. R.A., Respondent v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Public Welfare and Wyoming County Human Services, Intervenor, Petitioners.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 55
Pages: 1048–1048

Head Matter:
In re E.A. R.A., Respondent v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Public Welfare and Wyoming County Human Services, Intervenor, Petitioners.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Oct. 15, 2012.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 15th day of October, 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioners, are:
1. Whether [the] Commonwealth Court erred by determining that the videotape statement of a subject child is not admissible because the Administrative Law Judge heard testimony describing the statements before viewing the videotape?
2. Whether [the] Commonwealth Court erred by requiring that the videotape statement of a young victim of sexual abuse be corroborated by other evidence?