Case Name: Jeffrey Maurice YOUNG-BEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David R. BLUMBERG, Chairman; Ruth Ogle, Project Manager, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-06-04
Citations: 522 F. App'x 179
Docket Number: No. 11-7600
Parties: Jeffrey Maurice YOUNG-BEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David R. BLUMBERG, Chairman; Ruth Ogle, Project Manager, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 522
Pages: 179–179

Head Matter:
Jeffrey Maurice YOUNG-BEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David R. BLUMBERG, Chairman; Ruth Ogle, Project Manager, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 11-7600.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 30, 2013.
Decided: June 4, 2013.
Jeffrey Maurice Young-Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Howe Baron, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Pikesville, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jeffrey Maurice Young-Bey appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Young-Bey v. Blumberg, No. 1:10-cv-02448-JFM (D. Md. Aug. 25 & Oct. 17, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.