Case Name: STIEGLITZ, Respondent, v. BELDING, Appellant
Court: New York City Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1897-04-01
Citations: 44 N.Y.S. 1130
Docket Number: 
Parties: STIEGLITZ, Respondent, v. BELDING, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's New York Supplement
Volume: 44
Pages: 1130–1130

Head Matter:
STIEGLITZ, Respondent, v. BELDING, Appellant.
(City Court of New York, General Term.
April 1, 1897.)
Action by Louis Stieglitz against Milo M. Belding, Jr.
Lexow, Mackellar & Wells, for appellant.
Cardoza & Nathan, for respondent.

Opinion:
FITZSIMONS, P. J.
The demurrer was properly sustained. Knorr v. Bates, 12 Misc. Rep. 396, 33 N. Y. Supp. 691; Id., 14 Misc. Rep. 501, 35 N. Y. Supp. 1060; Ralli v. Hillyer, 15 Misc. Rep. 692, 40 N. Y. Supp. 1148. The order and judgment appealed from are therefore affirmed, with costs to the respondent.