Case Name: In the Matter of E. M. Z., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. E. M. Z., Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2009-04-29
Citations: 228 Or. App. 225
Docket Number: M0807026; A139523
Parties: In the Matter of E. M. Z., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. E. M. Z., Appellant.
Judges: Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Schuman, Judge, and Ortega, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 228
Pages: 225–226

Head Matter:
Submitted April 3,
reversed April 29, 2009
In the Matter of E. M. Z., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. E. M. Z., Appellant.
Clackamas County Circuit Court
M0807026; A139523
206 P3d 1212
Gay Canaday filed the brief for appellant.
John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Erika L. Hadlock, Acting Solicitor General, and Amanda J. Austin, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Schuman, Judge, and Ortega, Judge.
PER CURIAM

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
In this mental commitment case, appellant contends that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence that her mental disorder caused her to be a danger to herself or to others or unable to provide for her basic needs. The state concedes the point. On de novo review, we agree that the evidence is legally insufficient.
Reversed.