Case Name: Maria Isabel SANJUR; Maria Isabel Sanjur, Jr., Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-03-31
Citations: 372 F. App'x 694
Docket Number: No. 07-71133
Parties: Maria Isabel SANJUR; Maria Isabel Sanjur, Jr., Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before: SCHROEDER, PREGERSON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 372
Pages: 694–694

Head Matter:
Maria Isabel SANJUR; Maria Isabel Sanjur, Jr., Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 07-71133.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted: March 16, 2010.
Decided: March 31, 2010.
Law Office of David Paz-Soldan, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioners.
Before: SCHROEDER, PREGERSON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Maria Isabel Sanjur and her daughter, Maria Isabel Sanjur, natives and citizens of Panama, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order denying their motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen and review de novo due process claims due to ineffective assistance of counsel. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir.2005). We deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Petitioners' motion to reopen where Petitioners lacked "plausible grounds for relief." See Rojas-Garcia v. Ashcroft, 339 F.3d 814, 826 (9th Cir.2003).
Petitioners' remaining contentions are unpersuasive.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.