Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arthur Lee HAIRSTON, Sr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-02-23
Citations: 467 F. App'x 234
Docket Number: No. 11-7535
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Arthur Lee HAIRSTON, Sr., Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 467
Pages: 234–235

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Arthur Lee HAIRSTON, Sr., Defendant—Appellant.
No. 11-7535.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 16, 2012.
Decided: Feb. 23, 2012.
Arthur Lee Hairston, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Arthur Lee Hairston appeals the district court's order granting in part Hairston's 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hairston, No. 3:00-cr-00024-JPB-JES-1 (N.D.W.Va. Nov. 1, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.