Case Name: James L. ROUDABUSH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Thomas M. BELK, Jr.; Belk Stores, Inc.; Jan W. Walke; Harney; Spotsylvania County Sheriff; William Neely; John Doe, Loss Prevention Officer, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-02-13
Citations: 465 F. App'x 242
Docket Number: No. 11-1968
Parties: James L. ROUDABUSH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Thomas M. BELK, Jr.; Belk Stores, Inc.; Jan W. Walke; Harney; Spotsylvania County Sheriff; William Neely; John Doe, Loss Prevention Officer, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 465
Pages: 242–242

Head Matter:
James L. ROUDABUSH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Thomas M. BELK, Jr.; Belk Stores, Inc.; Jan W. Walke; Harney; Spotsylvania County Sheriff; William Neely; John Doe, Loss Prevention Officer, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 11-1968.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 17, 2012.
Decided: Feb. 13, 2012.
James L. Roudabush, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James L. Roudabush appeals the district court's orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Roudabush v. Belk, No. 3:11-cv-00255-GCM (W.D.N.C. Aug. 8 & 19, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.