Case Name: JOSEPH McCADDEN, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. WEST END BUILDING AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, A BODY CORPORATE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1941-09-19
Citations: 127 N.J.L. 245
Docket Number: 
Parties: JOSEPH McCADDEN, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. WEST END BUILDING AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, A BODY CORPORATE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 127
Pages: 245–245

Head Matter:
JOSEPH McCADDEN, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. WEST END BUILDING AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, A BODY CORPORATE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Submitted May 31, 1941 —
Decided September 19, 1941.
For the appellant, William B. McMichael (Reynier J. Wortendyke, Jr., of counsel).
For the respondent, David Roskein (Harry Cohn, of counsel).

Opinion:
Pee Cueiam.
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Justice Perskie.
It is not contended that there is no sufficient basis in the evidence for the finding that the enucleation of the employee's eye was due to the industrial accident; and we have not considered that question.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Case, Bodine, Donges, Fetter, Poetes, Colte, Deae, Wells, WolfsKetl, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.