Case Name: Homer Orr et al v. The State
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1940-06-12
Citations: 139 Tex. Crim. 436
Docket Number: No. 21083
Parties: Homer Orr et al v. The State.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Criminal Reports
Volume: 139
Pages: 436–437

Head Matter:
Homer Orr et al v. The State.
No. 21083.
Delivered June 12, 1940.
The opinion states the case.
R. S. Ragsdale, of Burkburnett, for appellants.
Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Attorney, of Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
BEAUCHAMP, Judge.
This is a bond forfeiture case.
The statement of facts does not show that the State offered in evidence, upon the trial of the case, the bond upon which the forfeiture was predicated; nor does same appear in the transcript.
The appellants answered by general demurrer and general denial. The State was, therefore, under the burden of introducing in evidence the bail bond, in order to be entitled to judgment. White v. State, 276 S. W. 274; Baker v. State, 17 S. W. 256.
It follows that the judgment is not supported by the evidence.
The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.