Case Name: RIEZMAN & BLITZ, P.C., Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. Richard KLINE, Appellant/Cross-Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1999-06-22
Citations: 998 S.W.2d 106
Docket Number: No. 74554
Parties: RIEZMAN & BLITZ, P.C., Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. Richard KLINE, Appellant/Cross-Respondent.
Judges: Before: GARY M. GAERTNER, P. J., RHODES RUSSELL, J., and JAMES R. DOWD, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 998
Pages: 106–106

Head Matter:
RIEZMAN & BLITZ, P.C., Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. Richard KLINE, Appellant/Cross-Respondent.
No. 74554.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
June 22, 1999.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 17, 1999.
Application for Transfer Denied Sept. 21, 1999.
W. Morris Taylor, Gerald A. Sims, Jr., Clayton, for appellant.
James W. Erwin, John R. Musgrave, St. Louis, Matthew J. Darrough, Nelson L. Mitten, Thomas R. Carnes, Elizabeth Ann Bodnam, James 0. Hacking, John E. Bardgett, Clayton, for respondent.
Before: GARY M. GAERTNER, P. J., RHODES RUSSELL, J., and JAMES R. DOWD, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Richard Kline appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding for Riezman & Blitz on its claim for legal fees and expenses and against Kline on his counterclaim for legal malpractice.
No error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).