Case Name: DIAMOND T. UTAH, INC., a Utah corporation, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, a corporation authorized to do business in the State of Utah, Defendant and Respondent
Court: Utah Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Utah
Decision Date: 1972-06-22
Citations: 28 Utah 2d 68
Docket Number: No. 12628
Parties: DIAMOND T. UTAH, INC., a Utah corporation, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, a corporation authorized to do business in the State of Utah, Defendant and Respondent.
Judges: CALLISTER, C. J., and TUCKETT, ELLETT and CROCKETT, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Utah Reports, Second Series
Volume: 28
Pages: 68–69

Head Matter:
498 P.2d 355
DIAMOND T. UTAH, INC., a Utah corporation, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, a corporation authorized to do business in the State of Utah, Defendant and Respondent.
No. 12628.
Supreme Court of Utah.
June 22, 1972.
Bettilyon & Howard, Homer F. Wilkinson, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff-appellant.
Ray, Quinney & Nebeker, L. Ridd Larson, Salt Lake City, for defendant-respondent.

Opinion:
HENRIOD, Justice:
Appeal from a judgment sequeling a remand from this court in the same titled case, 21 Utah 2d 124, 441 P.2d 705 (1968), where this court concluded that the trial court erred in granting a summary judgment, since there was a genuine issue of fact as to whether a truck was stolen or no. Affirmed, with no costs.
Reference is made to the previous case for the facts and points involved. On the remand hearing, the record reveals that there were no facts sufficient to establish that the vehicle was stolen, and the trial court so found, with which conclusion we agree. Our only alternative, therefore, is to affirm.
CALLISTER, C. J., and TUCKETT, ELLETT and CROCKETT, JJ., concur.