Case Name: BOREY v. DI GEORGE
Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 1930-06-16
Citations: 14 La. App. 76
Docket Number: No. 13,350
Parties: BOREY v. DI GEORGE
Judges: 
Reporter: Louisiana Court of Appeals Reports
Volume: 14
Pages: 76–77

Head Matter:
No. 13,350
Orleans
BOREY v. DI GEORGE
(June 16, 1930. Opinion and Decree.)
(July 1, 1930. Rehearing Refused.)
Denechaud & Robin, of New Orleans, attorneys for plaintiff, appellee.
Harry M. Mayo, Jr., of New Orleans, attorney for defendant, appellant.

Opinion:
WESTERFIELD, J.
This case grows out of a collision between motor vehicles. The trial court resolved the conflicting testimony as to the responsibility for the accident in plaintiff's favor, and awarded him judgment in the sum of $216.55.
We believe that the conclusions of the court on the question of liability are, correct, but find that one item of damage claimed is not proven to our satisfaction. Twenty-five dollars, which was allowed as damage to certain flowers which were contained in plaintiff's truck at the time of the accident (plaintiff being a florist), must be deducted because not • established by the testimony.
For the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed from will be amended by reducing the amount awarded plaintiff from $216.55 to $191.55, and, as thus amended, affirmed. Plaintiff to pay costs of appeal.