Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Daniel M. HANCOCK, Appellant; Daniel HANCOCK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1996-03-12
Citations: 917 S.W.2d 214
Docket Number: No. WD 48518
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Daniel M. HANCOCK, Appellant. Daniel HANCOCK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before HANNA, P.J., and SMART and ELLIS, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 917
Pages: 214–215

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Daniel M. HANCOCK, Appellant. Daniel HANCOCK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
No. WD 48518.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Submitted Jan. 11, 1996.
Decided March 12, 1996.
Susan L. Hogan, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellants.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before HANNA, P.J., and SMART and ELLIS, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Daniel M. Hancock was convicted of assault in the first degree, § 565.050, RSMo 1986, robbery in the first degree, § 569.020, and two counts of armed criminal action, § 571.015. Hancock was sentenced as a prior, persistent and class X offender to 45 years imprisonment. Hancock appeals from his convictions and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. On appeal, Hancock claims that the trial court erred in denying his request to demonstrate to the jury that he is right-handed. He also claims that the motion court erred in denying post-conviction relief because his trial counsel was ineffective for offering into evidence the Swiss Army knife he possessed at the time he was arrested.
Judgment is affirmed. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).