Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alfredo CORREA, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-07-15
Citations: 139 F. App'x 825
Docket Number: No. 04-50031
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Alfredo CORREA, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, RAWLINSON and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 139
Pages: 825–825

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Alfredo CORREA, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 04-50031.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 11, 2005.
Decided July 15, 2005.
Anne K. Perry, U.S. Attorney, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Vincent J. Brunkow, John L. Haeussler, Federal Defender’s of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, RAWLINSON and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Alfredo Correa appeals the district court's order revoking his supervised release. The district court lacked jurisdiction to revoke Correa's supervised release after the supervision term had expired because no warrant, based upon sworn allegations, was issued during the supervision term as required by 18 U.S.C. § 3583(i). United States v. Vargas-Amaya, 389 F.3d 901, 907 (9th Cir.2004).
The district court's order is therefore VACATED and the case is remanded for further proceedings.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.