Case Name: Cals IFENATUORA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-04-27
Citations: 425 F. App'x 266
Docket Number: No. 10-7556
Parties: Cals IFENATUORA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 425
Pages: 266–266

Head Matter:
Cals IFENATUORA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 10-7556.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 12, 2011.
Decided: April 27, 2011.
Cals Ifenatuora, Appellant Pro Se. Melanie Lisa Glickson, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland; William Davis Moomau, Office of the United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Cals C. Ifenatuora seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his motion for discovery. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Ifenatuo-ra seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we grant the Government's motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Ifenatuora's motion to grant access to evidence and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.