Case Name: THE SOUTHLAND CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THE TOWNSHIP OF EDISON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT AND ROSEANNE AMENDOLA, T/A MENLO PARK AMOCO, AMOCO OIL COMPANY & AMOCO CORPORATION, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF THE TOWNSHIP OF EDISON AND TOWNSHIP OF EDISON, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS
Court: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1987-03-31
Citations: 220 N.J. Super. 294
Docket Number: 
Parties: THE SOUTHLAND CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THE TOWNSHIP OF EDISON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT AND ROSEANNE AMENDOLA, T/A MENLO PARK AMOCO, AMOCO OIL COMPANY & AMOCO CORPORATION, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF THE TOWNSHIP OF EDISON AND TOWNSHIP OF EDISON, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Superior Court Reports
Volume: 220
Pages: 294–294

Head Matter:
THE SOUTHLAND CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THE TOWNSHIP OF EDISON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT AND ROSEANNE AMENDOLA, T/A MENLO PARK AMOCO, AMOCO OIL COMPANY & AMOCO CORPORATION, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF THE TOWNSHIP OF EDISON AND TOWNSHIP OF EDISON, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued March 17, 1987
Decided March 31, 1987.
Before Judges GAULKIN, BAIME and ASHBEY.
Peter A. DeSarno argued the cause for appellants.
Lee M. Hymerling argued the cause for respondent The Southland Corporation (Archer & Greiner, attorneys; Lee M. Hymerling, John P. Hauch, Jr. and Christopher BR. Gibson, on the brief).
Vincent D. Paragano argued the cause for respondents Roseanne Amendola, Amoco Oil Company and Amoco Corporation (Vincent D. Paragano and Fran J. Garb, on the brief).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Keefe's opinion reported at 217 N.J.Super. 158 (Ch.Div.1986).