Case Name: Arline NEUFELD, Appellant, v. Scott NEUFELD, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1994-12-28
Citations: 648 So. 2d 249
Docket Number: No. 94-2774
Parties: Arline NEUFELD, Appellant, v. Scott NEUFELD, Appellee.
Judges: Before COPE, LEVY and GODERICH, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 648
Pages: 249–249

Head Matter:
Arline NEUFELD, Appellant, v. Scott NEUFELD, Appellee.
No. 94-2774.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 28, 1994.
Elser, Greene & Hodor and Cynthia Greene, Miami, for appellant.
Beth Tyler Vogelsang, Miami, for appellee.
Before COPE, LEVY and GODERICH, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The record contains substantial competent evidence to support the trial court's ruling. There is no legal basis for this Court to disturb the trial court's determination regarding the credibility of the witnesses. Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So.2d 13, 16 (Fla.), on remand to, 336 So.2d 1282 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Povia v. Melvin, 66 So.2d 494, 494 — 95 (Fla.1953); Ross v. Bandi, 566 So.2d 55, 56 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); S. Kornreich & Sons, Inc. v. Titan Agencies, Inc., 423 So.2d 940, 942 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Atkins v. Keller, 400 So.2d 168, 169 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 411 So.2d 380 (Fla.1981). Accordingly, the trial court's decision is affirmed,