Case Name: Elizabeth Bertha Akerman, Respondent, v. Fred Nathan and Others, Appellants, Impleaded with Norman Realty and Construction Corporation, Defendant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1932-10
Citations: 236 A.D. 812
Docket Number: 
Parties: Elizabeth Bertha Akerman, Respondent, v. Fred Nathan and Others, Appellants, Impleaded with Norman Realty and Construction Corporation, Defendant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 236
Pages: 812–812

Head Matter:
Elizabeth Bertha Akerman, Respondent, v. Fred Nathan and Others, Appellants, Impleaded with Norman Realty and Construction Corporation, Defendant.

Opinion:
Order denying motion for judgment on the pleadings affirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements. The essential factor presented by the complaint and the bill of particulars is the sale by the defendants under a judgment which had previously been satisfied. Order bringing in an additional party defendant affirmed. In the circumstances, it may properly be left to the new party defendant to move with respect to the amended or supplemental complaint if so advised. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.