Case Name: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Michael FULLER, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-04-08
Citations: 616 So. 2d 49
Docket Number: No. 80729
Parties: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Michael FULLER, Respondent.
Judges: BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 616
Pages: 49–50

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Michael FULLER, Respondent.
No. 80729.
Supreme Court of Florida.
April 8, 1993.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Richard Parker and Edward C. Hill, Asst. Attys. Gen., Tallahassee, for petitioner.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender and Kathleen Stover, Asst. Public Defender, Second Judicial Circuit, Tallahassee, for respondent.

Opinion:
SHAW, Justice.
We have for review Fuller v. State, 605 So.2d 1307 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), wherein the district court certified a question of great public importance. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We have since answered the question in State v. Rucker, 613 So.2d 460 (Fla.1993). We quash Fuller and remand for proceedings consistent with Rucker,
It is so ordered.
BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.
. We decline to address the other certified question in Fuller since neither party raised or briefed the issue.