Case Name: ZHAO WEN CHEN, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-12-13
Citations: 457 F. App'x 302
Docket Number: No. 10-1718
Parties: ZHAO WEN CHEN, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
Judges: Before KING, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 457
Pages: 302–303

Head Matter:
ZHAO WEN CHEN, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 10-1718.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 16, 2011.
Decided: Dec. 13, 2011.
Michael Brown, New York, New York, for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, William C. Peachey, Assistant Director, Paul T. Cygnarowicz, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Before KING, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Petition denied in part and dismissed in part by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Zhao Wen Chen, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motions to reconsider and reopen. We have reviewed the administrative record and Chen's claims and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Chen's motion to reopen his asylum claim. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (c) (2011). We accordingly deny the petition for review in part for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Chen (B.I.A. June 2, 2010). We dismiss the petition for review in part for lack of jurisdiction with respect to Chen's challenge to the Board's denial of his motion to reopen and reconsider his claim for cancellation of removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i) (2006). Finally, we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED IN PART AND DISMISSED IN PART.