Case Name: S. M. Willock, Appellant, v. The Crescent Oil Company, Limited
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 1898-01-03
Citations: 184 Pa. 251
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 163
Parties: S. M. Willock, Appellant, v. The Crescent Oil Company, Limited.
Judges: Before Gbeen, Williams, McCollum, Mitchell, Dean and Fell, JJ.
Reporter: Pennsylvania State Reports
Volume: 184
Pages: 251–251

Head Matter:
S. M. Willock, Appellant, v. The Crescent Oil Company, Limited.
Argued Oct. 4, 1897.
Appeal, No. 163, Oct. T., 1897, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. No. 1, Allegheny Co., Sept. T., 1894, No. 234, overruling exceptions to report of referee.
Before Gbeen, Williams, McCollum, Mitchell, Dean and Fell, JJ.
Appeal dismissed.
J. S. Ferguson, with him E. 6r. Ferguson, for appellant.
J. McF. Carpenter, with him, S. B. Mitchell, for appellee.
January 3, 1898:

Opinion:
Opinion by
Mk. Justice Williams,
The appeal is from the same judgment which we have just considered on the appeal of the defendant, and in which an opinion has now been filed. The questions raised in both cases are substantially the same and a separate discussion of them in each case is wholly unnecessary; for the reasons given in the opinion in the appeal of the Crescent Oil Company, ante p. 245 the judgment lias been reversed and a venire facias de novo awarded.
The appeal in this case is dismissed.