Case Name: Christopher TONER, Petitioner v. The TRAVELERS HOME AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2016-09-08
Citations: 158 A.3d 64
Docket Number: No. 170 WAL 2016
Parties: Christopher TONER, Petitioner v. The TRAVELERS HOME AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondents
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 158
Pages: 64–65

Head Matter:
Christopher TONER, Petitioner v. The TRAVELERS HOME AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondents
No. 170 WAL 2016
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
September 8, 2016

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 8th day of September, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:
Whether the Superior Court correctly determined that an insured, who signed a UM/UIM stacking waiver at the inception of a single vehicle policy, was not entitled to stack UM/UIM benefits, even though the carrier failed to obtain stacking waivers when second and third vehicles were added to the policy?