Case Name: Alberto PEREZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2012-08-01
Citations: 95 So. 3d 397
Docket Number: No. 3D11-2232
Parties: Alberto PEREZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SHEPHERD, ROTHENBERG, and FERNANDEZ, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 95
Pages: 397–397

Head Matter:
Alberto PEREZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D11-2232.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Aug. 1, 2012.
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Melissa C. Del Valle, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Timothy R.M. Thomas, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SHEPHERD, ROTHENBERG, and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
CONFESSION OF ERROR
Alberto Perez appeals an order revoking his probation. Appellee, the State, concedes that at the hearing below, the court's oral pronouncement only found a violation of two conditions: possession of weapons while on probation without the consent of the probation officer ("Violation of Condition (K2) of the Order of Probation") and possession of weapons by a convicted felon ("Violation of Condition (K4) of the Order of Probation"). The State acknowledges that the revocation order erroneously included six conditions as a basis for revoking probation. •
Based on the State's concession, we reverse the revocation order in part and remand with instructions to strike the references to the four other conditions from the Order of Revocation of Probation. See Laffitte v. State, 16 So.3d 315, 316 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) ("A written order of probation revocation must conform to the court's oral pronouncement at a defendant's probation revocation hearing.") The defendant need not be present.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions.