Case Name: R. H. Poudrill v. The State
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1911-03-01
Citations: 61 Tex. Crim. 431
Docket Number: No. 563
Parties: R. H. Poudrill v. The State.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Criminal Reports
Volume: 61
Pages: 431–431

Head Matter:
R. H. Poudrill v. The State.
No. 563.
Decided March 1, 1911.
Local Option—Law in Force—Insufficiency of the Evidence.
Upon trial of a violation of the local option law, where no evidence was offered showing that local option had been adopted in the county of the prosecution, the conviction could not be sustained.
Appeal from the County Court of Shelby. Tried below before the Hon. W. D. White.
Appeal from a conviction of a violation 'of the local option law; penalty, a fine of $200.
The opinion states the case.
No brief on file for appellant.
C. E. Lane, Assistant Attorney-General, and H. E. Stephenson, for the State.

Opinion:
PRENDERGAST, Judge.
—This is an appeal from a conviction in the County Court of Shelby County for an illegal sale of intoxicating liquors.
An examination of the statement of facts shows that there was no evidence offered showing that local option had been adopted at any time in Shelby County, or the town or precinct in which the offense is charged to have occurred. It .has been the uniform holding of this court that where this occurs to reverse the case. There are many opinions to this effect. Tyrell v. State, 44 S. W. Rep., 159; Scott v. State, 44 S. W. Rep., 495; Lively v. State, 72 S. W. Rep., 393; Allen v. State, 98 S. W. Rep., 869; Bills v. State, 55 Texas Crim. Rep., 541. On this account the judgment of the lower court will be reversed and the cause remanded.
The other questions raised in the case- will probably not occur upon another trial, and it is unnecessary to decide any of the questions raised.
Reversed and remanded.