Case Name: Peter Vanvaks, Plaintiff in Error, vs. James N. Chantly, Defendant in Error
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1933-01-09
Citations: 107 Fla. 647
Docket Number: 
Parties: Peter Vanvaks, Plaintiff in Error, vs. James N. Chantly, Defendant in Error.
Judges: Buford, C.J., and Whitfield and Brown, J.J., concur.
Reporter: Florida Reports
Volume: 107
Pages: 647–647

Head Matter:
Peter Vanvaks, Plaintiff in Error, vs. James N. Chantly, Defendant in Error.
145 So. 838.
Decision filed January 9, 1933.
Petition for rehearing denied February 15, 1933.
Bart A. Riley, for Plaintiff in Error;
Hendricks n& Hendricks, fob Defendant in Error.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the. same is hereby affirmed.
Buford, C.J., and Whitfield and Brown, J.J., concur.