Case Name: Robert MAYO, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Sharon MAYO, Appellee/Cross-Appellant
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1993-06-16
Citations: 619 So. 2d 513
Docket Number: No. 92-1707
Parties: Robert MAYO, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Sharon MAYO, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
Judges: GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and WARNER and FARMER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 619
Pages: 513–513

Head Matter:
Robert MAYO, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Sharon MAYO, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
No. 92-1707.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
June 16, 1993.
Nancy Little Hoffmann, Nancy Little Hoffmann, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant, cross-appellee,
No brief filed for appeiiee, cross-appellant.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant raises three points, all of which have merit. Accordingly, we reverse and remand with direction to proceed in accordance herewith.
The trial court abused its discretion in the total award of alimony and child support. See Todesco v. Todesco, 583 So.2d 774 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Gentile v. Gentile, 565 So.2d 820 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). Further, it erred in failing to set a date for termination of rehabilitative alimony. See Roth v. Roth, 615 So.2d 868 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Sumner v. Sumner, 480 So.2d 706 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); Zilbert v. Zilbert, 287 So.2d 100 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973). Finally, the-trial court erred in awarding an attorney's fee without any evidence in support thereof. See Prom v. Prom, 589 So.2d 1363 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1985).
GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and WARNER and FARMER, JJ., concur.