Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Patricia DARDEN, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-11-16
Citations: 488 F. App'x 749
Docket Number: No. 12-7402
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Patricia DARDEN, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 488
Pages: 749–750

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Patricia DARDEN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-7402.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 13, 2012.
Decided: Nov. 16, 2012.
Patricia Darden, Appellant Pro Se. Olivia L. Norman, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Patricia Darden appeals the district court's order denying her 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and ñnd no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Darden, No. 3:03-cr-00291-HEH-2 (E.D.Va. Aug. 3, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.