Case Name: Robert J. ARBS et ux., Petitioners, v. ROY E. THOMAS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and Roy E. Thomas, Individually, Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Texas
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1985-12-18
Citations: 700 S.W.2d 919
Docket Number: No. C-4470
Parties: Robert J. ARBS et ux., Petitioners, v. ROY E. THOMAS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and Roy E. Thomas, Individually, Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 700
Pages: 919–919

Head Matter:
Robert J. ARBS et ux., Petitioners, v. ROY E. THOMAS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and Roy E. Thomas, Individually, Respondents.
No. C-4470.
Supreme Court of Texas.
Dec. 18, 1985.
Bishop, Payne, Lamsens & Brown, Andrew C. Brassey and M. Kelly Allbritton, Fort Worth, for petitioners.
Steves, Leonard & Jones, Michael L. Sampson, Fort Worth, for respondents.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
In disposing of the alter ego question the court of appeals held that there was no evidence to support the jury finding of alter ego. Also, the court of appeals held there was insufficient evidence to support the finding. 692 S.W.2d 926. However, because that court rendered the alter ego part of the judgment we conclude the actual holding of the court of appeals was "no evidence." Therefore, we refuse the application for want of reversible error. Garza v. Alviar, 395 S.W.2d 821, 823 (Tex.1965).