Case Name: FLAGSTAR BANK, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Theresa GHAFOORI, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2008-10-28
Citations: 272 S.W.3d 392
Docket Number: No. ED 90924
Parties: FLAGSTAR BANK, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Theresa GHAFOORI, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 272
Pages: 392–392

Head Matter:
FLAGSTAR BANK, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Theresa GHAFOORI, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 90924.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Oct. 28, 2008.
Application for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Dec. 18, 2008.
Application for Transfer Denied Jan. 27, 2009.
John Matthew Reynolds, Saint Louis, MO, for Plaintiff/Respondent.
John T. Ahlquist, Alex Mark Kanter, Saint Louis, MO, for Defendant/Appellant.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Theresa Ghafoori (Appellant) appeals from the trial court's Order and Judgment granting Flagstar Bank's (Respondent) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and denying Appellant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, and quieting title for certain property in favor of Respondent. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that Respondent is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. ITT Commercial Fin. Corp. v. Mid-Am. Marine Supply Corp., 854 S.W.2d 371, 376 (Mo.banc 1993). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).