Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Salvador CANCHOLA, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2013-06-17
Citations: 523 F. App'x 282
Docket Number: No. 12-10877
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Salvador CANCHOLA, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING, CLEMENT, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 523
Pages: 282–282

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Salvador CANCHOLA, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-10877
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
June 17, 2013.
James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Kevin Joel Page, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before KING, CLEMENT, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Salvador Canchóla, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Can-chóla has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Canchola's response. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.