Case Name: CHC Food Service, Inc., Appellant, v. Gordon Ambach, as Commissioner of Education of the State of New York, et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 1.); Food Service Dynamics, Inc., Appellant, v. Gordon Ambach, as Commissioner of Education of the State of New York, et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 2.); Food Service Dynamics, Inc., Appellant, v. Gordon Ambach, as Commissioner of Education of the State of New York, et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 3.); Food Service Dynamics, Inc., Appellant, v. Gordon Ambach, as Commissioner of Education of the State of New York, et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 4.)
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1979-12-13
Citations: 48 N.Y.2d 932
Docket Number: 
Parties: CHC Food Service, Inc., Appellant, v Gordon Ambach, as Commissioner of Education of the State of New York, et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 1.) Food Service Dynamics, Inc., Appellant, v Gordon Ambach, as Commissioner of Education of the State of New York, et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 2.) Food Service Dynamics, Inc., Appellant, v Gordon Ambach, as Commissioner of Education of the State of New York, et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 3.) Food Service Dynamics, Inc., Appellant, v Gordon Ambach, as Commissioner of Education of the State of New York, et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 4.)
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 48
Pages: 932–933

Head Matter:
CHC Food Service, Inc., Appellant, v Gordon Ambach, as Commissioner of Education of the State of New York, et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 1.) Food Service Dynamics, Inc., Appellant, v Gordon Ambach, as Commissioner of Education of the State of New York, et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 2.) Food Service Dynamics, Inc., Appellant, v Gordon Ambach, as Commissioner of Education of the State of New York, et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 3.) Food Service Dynamics, Inc., Appellant, v Gordon Ambach, as Commissioner of Education of the State of New York, et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 4.)
Argued November 20, 1979;
decided December 13, 1979
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Lawrence K. Katz for appellants.
Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Patricia C. Armstrong and Shirley Adelson Siegel of counsel), for respondents.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (68 AD2d 897).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.