Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ivory PETERS, Jr., a/k/a Buster, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-01-27
Citations: 363 F. App'x 241
Docket Number: No. 09-7503
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ivory PETERS, Jr., a/k/a Buster, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 363
Pages: 241–242

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ivory PETERS, Jr., a/k/a Buster, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 09-7503.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 19, 2010.
Decided: Jan. 27, 2010.
Ivory Peters, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Wu, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
. Ivory Peters, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Peters, No. 3:06-cr-00203-REP-6 (E.D.Va. July 22, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.