Case Name: In re UNITED STATES GUARANTY CORPORATION. ALLEN et al. v. KEMP; SAME v. JENKINS
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1933-01-27
Citations: 62 F.2d 1047
Docket Number: Nos. 7047, 7046
Parties: In re UNITED STATES GUARANTY CORPORATION. ALLEN et al. v. KEMP. SAME v. JENKINS.
Judges: Before WILBUR and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges, and NORCROSS, District Judge.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 62
Pages: 1047–1048

Head Matter:
In re UNITED STATES GUARANTY CORPORATION. ALLEN et al. v. KEMP. SAME v. JENKINS.
Nos. 7047, 7046.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Jan. 27, 1933.
Mitchell, Silberberg & Knupp, of Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioners.
Before WILBUR and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges, and NORCROSS, District Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Applications for leave to appeal denied. An appeal lies from the order of the court allowing or disallowing creditors' claims. We see no reason for reviewing an: interlocutory order of the court permitting a creditor to contest the claims of other creditors. See, on this general subject, In re Gelino's Inc. (C. C. A.) 51 F.(2d) 875. The question as to whether or not a creditor who has opposed the allowance of the claims of other creditors can appeal from the order allowing the claim is not involved upon this application.