Case Name: Fanny R. Holland, Resp't, v. Arthur Brown, App'lt
Court: New York Supreme Court, General Term
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1892-02-08
Citations: 44 N.Y. St. Rep. 936
Docket Number: 
Parties: Fanny R. Holland, Resp’t, v. Arthur Brown, App’lt.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 44
Pages: 936–936

Head Matter:
Fanny R. Holland, Resp’t, v. Arthur Brown, App’lt.
Appeal from judgment in favor of plaintiff.
Action to reform a deed on the ground of fraud.
Goodrich, Beady & Goodrich {John F. Foley, of counsel), for app’lt; Henry A. Monfort, for resp’t.

Opinion:
Dykman, J.
This is an equitable action for the reformation of a deed of conveyance of real property. The cause was tried before a judge at special term, and he has found all the facts constituting the fraud in favor of the plaintiff and the testimony fully sustains his finding.
All the questions of law were properly disposed of and we find no error.
The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
Pratt, J., concurs; Barnard, P. J., not sitting.