Case Name: Dana Lynn MCQUADE, Appellant, v. Landon Bruce HOLROYD, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2017-02-03
Citations: 208 So. 3d 848
Docket Number: Case No. 5D16-3009
Parties: Dana Lynn MCQUADE, Appellant, v. Landon Bruce HOLROYD, Appellee.
Judges: COHEN, C.J., PALMER and ORFINGER, JJ,, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 208
Pages: 848–848

Head Matter:
Dana Lynn MCQUADE, Appellant, v. Landon Bruce HOLROYD, Appellee.
Case No. 5D16-3009
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Opinion filed February 3, 2017
Jennifer A. Englert, of The Orlando Law Group, P.L., Orlando, for Appellant.
Hal Roen, of Hal Roen, P.A., Maitland, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Because we do not have a transcript of the proceedings below, we cannot resolve the underlying factual issues in order to determine whether the trial court's judgment on the issue of child support is without evidentiary support. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979). In the absence of a transcript, we will only reverse where the error appears on the face of the judgment. See Monacelli v. Gonzalez, 883 So.2d 361, 362 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); Hoirup v. Hoirup, 862 So.2d 780, 782 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). Appellant has made no such showing in this case.
AFFIRMED.
COHEN, C.J., PALMER and ORFINGER, JJ,, concur.