Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arne SOREIDE, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-05-21
Citations: 604 F. App'x 913
Docket Number: No. 13-13573
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arne SOREIDE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JORDAN and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 604
Pages: 913–913

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arne SOREIDE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 13-13573
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
May 21, 2015.
Kathleen Mary Salyer, Wifredo A. Ferrer, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, Antonia J. Barnes, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Carol E.A. Degraffenreidt, Attorney General’s Office, West Palm Beach, FL, Neil Karadbil, U-S. Attorney’s Office, Jeffrey A. Neiman, Law Offices of Jeffrey A. Nei-man, Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Faith Mesnekoff, Faith Mesnekoff, PA, Miami, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Arne Soreide, Fort Dix, NJ, pro se.
Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JORDAN and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Faith Mesnekoff, appointed counsel for Arne Soreide in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no argua-. ble issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Soreide's sentence is AFFIRMED.