Case Name: Carolyn De GUZMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NIH FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-10-25
Citations: 399 F. App'x 787
Docket Number: No. 10-1825
Parties: Carolyn De GUZMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NIH FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 399
Pages: 787–787

Head Matter:
Carolyn De GUZMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NIH FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 10-1825.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 19, 2010.
Decided: Oct. 25, 2010.
Carolyn de Guzman, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey William Larroca, Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, L.L.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Carolyn de Guzman appeals the district court's order granting Defendant's motion for summary judgment on her employment discrimination and retaliation claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Guzman v. NIH Fed. Credit Union, No. 8:08-cv-03213-PJM, 2010 WL 2802127 (D.Md. July 14, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.