Case Name: CENTURY 21 ADMIRAL'S PORT, INC., a Florida corporation, and Admiral's Port North, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellants, v. William H. WALKER, Jr. and Amerifirst Federal Savings and Loan Association, a United States corporation, Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1985-03-19
Citations: 471 So. 2d 544
Docket Number: No. 84-299
Parties: CENTURY 21 ADMIRAL’S PORT, INC., a Florida corporation, and Admiral’s Port North, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellants, v. William H. WALKER, Jr. and Amerifirst Federal Savings and Loan Association, a United States corporation, Appellees.
Judges: Before NESBITT, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 471
Pages: 544–545

Head Matter:
CENTURY 21 ADMIRAL’S PORT, INC., a Florida corporation, and Admiral’s Port North, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellants, v. William H. WALKER, Jr. and Amerifirst Federal Savings and Loan Association, a United States corporation, Appellees.
No. 84-299.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 19, 1985.
On Rehearing July 2, 1985.
William C. Hearon, Miami, for appellants.
Fowler, White, Burnett, Hurley, Banick & Strickroot and Michael J. Cappucio and Kathy M. Klock, Miami, for appellees.
Before NESBITT, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Century 21 Admiral's Port, Inc. and Admiral's Port North, Inc. appeal dismissal of their complaint alleging negligent and fraudulent misrepresentation. We affirm on a holding that since the time for performance was left subject to future agreement, the appellants had no right to rely on the representation made. Cf. Bruce v. American Development Corp., 408 So.2d 857 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982) (real estate broker had no right to rely on prospective purchaser's statement that it was ready, willing and able to buy); Staheli v. Kauffman, 122 Ariz. 380, 595 P.2d 172 (1979) (promise too indefinite to be relied upon); Grosser v. Kandel-Iken Builders, Inc., 647 S.W.2d 911 (Mo.Ct.App.1983) (statement too vague to support an action for fraudulent misrepresentation).
Affirmed.