Case Name: William BROOKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1984-10-09
Citations: 456 So. 2d 1305
Docket Number: No. AW-329
Parties: William BROOKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: SMITH, WENTWORTH and WIGGIN-TON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 456
Pages: 1305–1305

Head Matter:
William BROOKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. AW-329.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Oct. 9, 1984.
L. Sanford Selvey, II, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Gregory G. Cos-tas, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for ap-pellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant seeks review of a sentence imposed for armed robbery of a convenience store, asserting that the trial court erred in departing from the sentencing guidelines, Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We find the trial court did not err and we affirm. See Brooks v. State, 456 So.2d 1305, (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). We certify the same question we did in that case.
AFFIRMED.
SMITH, WENTWORTH and WIGGIN-TON, JJ., concur.