Case Name: In the Interest of V.E.P., a child
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1987-06-03
Citations: 507 So. 2d 804
Docket Number: No. 87-0665
Parties: In the Interest of V.E.P., a child.
Judges: DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and DELL, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 507
Pages: 804–804

Head Matter:
In the Interest of V.E.P., a child.
No. 87-0665.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
June 3, 1987.
Rehearing Denied Aug. 12, 1987.
Isidro Garcia of Florida Rural Legal Services, Inc., Belle Glade, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Jr., Atty. Gen., and Shirley A. Walker, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We treat this petition for writ of mandamus as a non-final appeal. We so advised the parties by previous order of court and directed appellee to file an answer brief within ten days from the date of that order. The Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services responded by stating, "[It] is submitted that DHRS has no opposition to visitation by the mother with VEP."
Accordingly, the order denying visitation to the mother is reversed. We remand this cause to the trial court with instructions to conduct a hearing to determine the terms and conditions of visitation so as to provide for the safety, well being and best interest of the child.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and DELL, JJ., concur.
. The order that is the subject of this non-final appeal was entered on February 17, 1987 in Case Number 80-342 CJS in the Circuit Court in and for Okeechobee County, Florida.