Case Name: Lamonte C. CURRY, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, o/b/o Latonya D. Smith, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2006-03-14
Citations: 922 So. 2d 1064
Docket Number: No. 1D05-4967
Parties: Lamonte C. CURRY, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, o/b/o Latonya D. Smith, Appellee.
Judges: BARFIELD, WEBSTER and BENTON, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 922
Pages: 1064–1064

Head Matter:
Lamonte C. CURRY, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, o/b/o Latonya D. Smith, Appellee.
No. 1D05-4967.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
March 14, 2006.
Lamonte C. Curry, pro se, appellant.
Charlie Crist, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant seeks review of an administrative order regarding child support and argues that the agency should have afforded him a hearing before entering the order. Appellee agrees that appellant timely requested a hearing and moves to relinquish jurisdiction so that the order can be vacated and the hearing held. We instead elect to treat the motion as a concession of error and reverse and remand to thé agency with directions that the order be vacated and further proceedings conducted. See Martin County Liquors, Inc. v. Dep't of Bus. Regulation, Div. of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco, 539 So.2d 8 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Cole v. Dep't of Prof'l Regulation, 502 So.2d 481 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).
Appellee's motion to strike the initial brief is denied as moot.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
BARFIELD, WEBSTER and BENTON, JJ., concur.