Case Name: Sellman et al. v. The State
Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1925-07-14
Citations: 34 Ga. App. 189
Docket Number: 16459
Parties: Sellman et al. v. The State.
Judges: Bloodworth, J., concurs. Broyles, O. J., dissents.
Reporter: Georgia Appeals Reports
Volume: 34
Pages: 189–190

Head Matter:
16459.
Sellman et al. v. The State.
Decided July 14, 1925.

Opinion:
Luke, J.
Plaintiffs in error were convicted of the oifense of simple larceny. The evidence did not authorize the conviction of the defendants upon the indictment. Eor this reason the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment reversed.
Bloodworth, J., concurs. Broyles, O. J., dissents.
Scott, Hornbuclcle & Moore, for plaintiffs in error.
John A. Boylcin, solicitor-general, 1L A. Stephens, Ralph H. Pharr, contra.