Case Name: LAWRENCE H. ROSENTHAL, INDIVIDUALLY AND t/a INDUSTRIAL REALTY AND FEIST & FEIST, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. ART METAL, INC., ETC., AND GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, ETC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1969-03-17
Citations: 53 N.J. 344
Docket Number: 
Parties: LAWRENCE H. ROSENTHAL, INDIVIDUALLY AND t/a INDUSTRIAL REALTY AND FEIST & FEIST, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. ART METAL, INC., ETC., AND GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, ETC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 53
Pages: 344–344

Head Matter:
LAWRENCE H. ROSENTHAL, INDIVIDUALLY AND t/a INDUSTRIAL REALTY AND FEIST & FEIST, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. ART METAL, INC., ETC., AND GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, ETC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Argued March 5, 1969
Decided March 17, 1969.
Mr. Edwin II. Stern argued the cause for appellant, Eeist & Eeist (Messrs. Hellring, Lindeman & Landau, attorneys).
Mr. Joel Sóndale argued the cause for appellant Lawrence H. Rosenthal (Messrs. Olein, Olein & Sóndale, attorneys; Messrs. Schechner & Targan, of counsel).
Mr. William L. Dill, Jr., argued the cause for respondent General Dynamics Corp. (Messrs. Sirylcer, Tams & Dill, attorneys; Mr. W. Hunt Dumont, of counsel).
Mr. Richard R. Hellsiern argued the cause for respondent Art Metal, Inc. (Messrs. Lowenstein, Sandler, Brochin & Kohl, attorneys; Mr. Murry D. Brochin and Mr. Richard R. Hellsiern, of counsel).

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, 101 N. J. Super. 156.
For affirmance—Justices Jacobs, Erancis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Haneman—6.
For reversal—None.