Case Name: Charles POINTER, Appellant, v. ST. LOUIS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW, Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-03-04
Citations: 30 F. App'x 665
Docket Number: No. 02-1156
Parties: Charles POINTER, Appellant, v. ST. LOUIS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW, Appellee.
Judges: Before LOKEN, BEAM, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 30
Pages: 665–666

Head Matter:
Charles POINTER, Appellant, v. ST. LOUIS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW, Appellee.
No. 02-1156.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 26, 2002.
Decided March 4, 2002.
Before LOKEN, BEAM, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Charles Pointer appeals the district court's pre-service dismissal of his action alleging false advertising and violations of the Freedom of Information Act and his civil rights. After de novo review, see Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir.2000) (per curiam), we conclude that the action was properly dismissed for fail ure to state a claim. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. 47A(a).
. The Honorable Rodney W. Sippel, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri,