Case Name: Alfred Roe et al., Ex'rs, Resp'ts, v. Caroline A. Strong et al., App'lts
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1893-02-28
Citations: 51 N.Y. St. Rep. 929
Docket Number: 
Parties: Alfred Roe et al., Ex’rs, Resp’ts, v. Caroline A. Strong et al., App’lts.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York State Reporter
Volume: 51
Pages: 929–929

Head Matter:
Court of Appeals.
Filed February 28, 1893.
Alfred Roe et al., Ex’rs, Resp’ts, v. Caroline A. Strong et al., App’lts.
John J. Macklin, for resp’ts; A. A. Spear, for app’lts.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on authority of previous opinion of this court, 119 N. Y., 316; 29 St. Rep., 504, and upon the opinion rendered below at special term; the difficulty suggested with respect to the boundaries in the Brewster-Seaton deed is to be satisfactorily resolved, upon careful consideration, in the way suggested by Judge Bartlett. All concur.