Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Michael LUCAS, Defendant-Appellant; Michael LUCAS, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent-Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1997-01-28
Citations: 938 S.W.2d 293
Docket Number: Nos. 69035, 70752
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Michael LUCAS, Defendant-Appellant. Michael LUCAS, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent-Respondent.
Judges: Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 938
Pages: 293–294

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Michael LUCAS, Defendant-Appellant. Michael LUCAS, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent-Respondent.
Nos. 69035, 70752.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Jan. 28, 1997.
A. Renae Adamson, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Joanne E. Joiner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals the judgment upon his conviction by a court of eight counts of sodomy, § 566.060, RSMo 1994, and two counts of sexual abuse in the first degree, § 566.100, RSMo 1994, for which he was sentenced to concurrent terms of twenty years for seven of the eight counts of sodomy, a concurrent term of seven years for the remaining count of sodomy, and concurrent terms of five years for the remaining counts of sexual abuse in the first degree. Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).