Case Name: Peter Michael BERGNE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT; et al., Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-07-10
Citations: 285 F. App'x 416
Docket Number: No. 08-15346
Parties: Peter Michael BERGNE, Petitioner—Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT; et al., Respondents—Appellees.
Judges: Before: LEAVY, THOMAS and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 285
Pages: 416–416

Head Matter:
Peter Michael BERGNE, Petitioner—Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT; et al., Respondents—Appellees.
No. 08-15346.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 27, 2008.
Filed July 10, 2008.
Peter Michael Bergne, Coalinga, CA, pro se.
Before: LEAVY, THOMAS and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
On April 29, 2008, this court concluded that because appellant challenges a condition of confinement in this appeal, a certificate of appealability is unnecessary. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). By same order, this court ordered appellant to show cause as to why the district court's July 10, 2007, judgment should not be summarily affirmed.
A review of appellant's response to the court's order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.