Case Name: Katherine W. BROOKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ray MABUS, The United States of America (Department of the Navy), Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-10-15
Citations: 485 F. App'x 622
Docket Number: No. 12-1579
Parties: Katherine W. BROOKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ray MABUS, The United States of America (Department of the Navy), Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 485
Pages: 622–623

Head Matter:
Katherine W. BROOKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ray MABUS, The United States of America (Department of the Navy), Defendant-Appellee.
No. 12-1579.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 25, 2012.
Decided: Oct. 15, 2012.
Katherine W. Brooks, Appellant Pro Se. Joel Eric Wilson, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Katherine W. Brooks appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to Defendant in her civil action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. § 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2003 & Supp.2012), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. § 621-34 (West 2008 & Supp.2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brooks v. Mabus, No. 2:11-cv-00320-AWA-TEM (E.D. Va. Mar. 2 & 5, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.