Case Name: RODNEY HOWEY, Respondent, v. Dan JOHNSON, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution, Appellant
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 1999-06-02
Citations: 161 Or. App. 108
Docket Number: 97-07-29021M; CA A100832
Parties: RODNEY HOWEY, Respondent, v. Dan JOHNSON, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution, Appellant.
Judges: Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim and Brewer, Judges.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 161
Pages: 108–109

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted April 5,
affirmed June 2,1999
RODNEY HOWEY, Respondent, v. Dan JOHNSON, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution, Appellant.
(97-07-29021M; CA A100832)
987 P2d 526
Christine Chute, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.
Bob Pangburn argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.
Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim and Brewer, Judges.
PER CURIAM
Brewer, J., concurring.

Opinion:
BREWER, J.,
concurring.
I concur in the result in this case because it is compelled by our decision in Peek v. Thompson, 160 Or App 260, 980 P2d 178 (1999). However, I persist in the view that Peek was incorrectly decided for one or more of the reasons stated in the dissent in that case.