Case Name: AETNA INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lorraine Marie MONTE, etc., and Ann Louise Rinehold, etc., Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1971-03-17
Citations: 438 F.2d 529
Docket Number: No. 23897
Parties: AETNA INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lorraine Marie MONTE, etc., and Ann Louise Rinehold, etc., Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 438
Pages: 529–530

Head Matter:
AETNA INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lorraine Marie MONTE, etc., and Ann Louise Rinehold, etc., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 23897.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
March 17, 1971.
John K. Stewart, San Francisco, Cal. (argued), J. D. Burdick, of Carroll, Davis, Burdick & McDonough, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.
Harold T. Faaland, of Wool, Richardson, Colbert & Shea, San Jose, Cal., for appellees.
Before DUNIWAY and CARTER, Circuit Judges, and GRAY, District Judge.
Honorable William P. Gray, United States District Judge, Central District of California.

Opinion:
ORDER
This case is controlled by California state law. On the basis of the following cases, decided after the decision below— viz., Herzog v. National American Ins. Co. (1970) 2 Cal.3d 192, 84 Cal.Rptr. 705, 465 P.2d 841; Huggins v. Yoshiwara (1970) 2 Cal.3d 200, 84 Cal.Rptr. 709, 465 P.2d 845, and State Farm Mutual Auto mobile Ins. Co. v. Allstate Ins. Co. (1970) 9 Cal.App.3d 508, 88 Cal.Rptr. 246.
It is ordered that the judgment is reversed and the case remanded with instructions to the district court to enter a judgment in favor of appellant.