Case Name: In the Interest of A.W., C.W., O.W., Plaintiff, JUVENILE OFFICER, Respondent, v. R.D.W. (Father), Appellant, T.N. (Mother), Defendant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2003-09-02
Citations: 113 S.W.3d 681
Docket Number: Nos. WD 62283-WD 62285
Parties: In the Interest of A.W., C.W., O.W., Plaintiff, JUVENILE OFFICER, Respondent, v. R.D.W. (Father), Appellant, T.N. (Mother), Defendant.
Judges: Before SMART, P.J., ULRICH and HARDWICK, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 113
Pages: 681–682

Head Matter:
In the Interest of A.W., C.W., O.W., Plaintiff, JUVENILE OFFICER, Respondent, v. R.D.W. (Father), Appellant, T.N. (Mother), Defendant.
Nos. WD 62283-WD 62285.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Sept. 2, 2003.
Greta Erhardt, Kansas City, MO, for Guardian.
Sharlie Pender, Independence, MO, for appellant.
Teresa L. Anderson, Kansas City, MO, for defendant.
Melissa Stanosheck, Kansas City, MO, for respondent.
Before SMART, P.J., ULRICH and HARDWICK, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
This appeal arises from a circuit court judgment finding jurisdiction over three minor children and placing them in protective custody pursuant to Section 211.031.1, R.S.Mo.2000. The children's father, R.D.W., appeals on jurisdictional grounds and disputes the sufficiency of the evidence to support the findings of parental neglect. Upon review of the record, we find no merit in the claims of error. The parties have been provided with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would be of no precedential value.
The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).