Case Name: Thomas Fitzpatrick, Respondent, v. Henry H. Rogers, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1925-06
Citations: 214 A.D. 800
Docket Number: 
Parties: Thomas Fitzpatrick, Respondent, v. Henry H. Rogers, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 214
Pages: 800–800

Head Matter:
Thomas Fitzpatrick, Respondent, v. Henry H. Rogers, Appellant.

Opinion:
We are 5of opinion that by the ruling of the trial court in denying defendant's motion to '.amend the answer upon the trial, defendant was foreclosed of a substantial defense to the action, and this calls for a reversal of the judgment. (Goldstein v. Schleifer, 209 App. Div. 899.) The judgment and order are, therefore, reversed on the law,- and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jayeox, Manning and Kelby, JJ., concur.