Case Name: Joel LEVINE, et al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent, United States of America, Real Party in Interest
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1985-11-01
Citations: 775 F.2d 1054
Docket Number: C.A. No. 85-7208
Parties: Joel LEVINE, et al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent, United States of America, Real Party in Interest.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 775
Pages: 1054–1056

Head Matter:
Joel LEVINE, et al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent, United States of America, Real Party in Interest.
C.A. No. 85-7208.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Nov. 1, 1985.
As Amended Nov. 12, 1985.
Paul L. Hoffman, Joan Howarth, Douglas E. Mirell, David P. Crochetiere, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioners.
Robert C. Bonner, U.S. Atty., Robert L. Brosio, Russell Hayman, Asst. U.S. Attys., Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent Dist. of Cal., etc.
Before SNEED, NELSON and BEEZER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
Prior report: 764 F.2d 590 (9th Cir.1985).
Judges Sneed and Beezer have voted to deny the petition for rehearing and to reject the petitioners' suggestion for rehearing en banc. Judge Nelson would grant the petition for rehearing and approve the petitioners' suggestion for rehearing en banc.
The full court has been advised of the suggestion for en banc rehearing. A vote has been taken, and has failed to receive a majority of votes in favor of en banc consideration. Fed.R.App.P. 35(b).
The petition for rehearing is denied and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is rejected.