Case Name: Dennis CURTIS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2012-03-20
Citations: 368 S.W.3d 241
Docket Number: No. ED 96982
Parties: Dennis CURTIS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 368
Pages: 241–242

Head Matter:
Dennis CURTIS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 96982.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
March 20, 2012.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 26, 2012.
Application for Transfer Denied July 3, 2012.
Kent Denzel, Assistant Public Defender, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Dennis Curtis, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).