Case Name: WHITFILL v. STATE
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1927-10-19
Citations: 299 S.W. 247
Docket Number: No. 11374
Parties: WHITFILL v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter
Volume: 299
Pages: 247–248

Head Matter:
WHITFILL v. STATE.
(No. 11374.)
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Oct. 19, 1927.
Rehearing Denied Nov. 16, 1927.
H. R. Bishop, of Panhandle, and J. A. Car-lisle, of Sherman, for appellant.
Sam D. Stinson, State’s Atty., and Robt. M. Lyles, Asst. State’s Atty., both of Austin, for the State.

Opinion:
LATTIMORE, J.
Conviction for possessing equipment, material, and a still for the manufacture of intoxicating liquor; punishment, five years in the penitentiary.
The record is before us without any statement of facts. There are two bills of exception, neither of which presents a complaint which can be considered, in the absence of a statement of facts. The indictment herein charges an offense under the law, and the charge of the court correctly presents the law of the ease.
No error appearing, the judgment will be affirmed.