Case Name: James Gregory ANTHONY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1998-01-28
Citations: 705 So. 2d 131
Docket Number: No. 96-2291
Parties: James Gregory ANTHONY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: GUNTHER and GROSS, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Senior Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 705
Pages: 131–132

Head Matter:
James Gregory ANTHONY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 96-2291.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jan. 28, 1998.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Cherry Grant, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and David M. Schultz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for ap-pellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the judgment of conviction but remand the case to correct the discrepancy between the oral and written pronouncements of sentence. At the sentencing hearing, the trial judge stated that he was sentencing appellant to fifteen years "concurrent to the sentence he's already serving." The last page of the written sentence indicates that the sentence as to count IV is to be served consecutively to the sentences previously imposed. The court's oral pronouncements at the sentencing hearing prevail over the written sentencing form. See Gibbs v. State, 693 So.2d 65 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); Thomas v. State, 595 So.2d 287 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).
GUNTHER and GROSS, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Senior Judge, concur.