Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Darrell Frazier, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 2015-02-24
Citations: 125 A.D.3d 551
Docket Number: 
Parties: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Darrell Frazier, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 125
Pages: 551–551

Head Matter:
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Darrell Frazier, Appellant.
[1 NYS3d 812]—

Opinion:
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel McCullough, J.), rendered January 17, 2013, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, assault in the third degree, menacing in the second degree (two counts) and criminal mischief in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of two to four years, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly exercised its discretion in precluding defendant from calling his mother as a witness since she was not present during the incident and the probative value of her proposed testimony was outweighed by the risk of confusing the issues, misleading the jury or inviting improper speculation (see People v Corby, 6 NY3d 231, 234-235 [2005]; People v Aska, 91 NY2d 979, 981 [1998]). In any event, any error in the preclusion of defendant's mother's testimony was harmless (see People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230 [1975]).
Concur — Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Saxe, Feinman and Clark, JJ.