Case Name: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent, v. Leon MILLS, Petitioner
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction: Pennsylvania
Decision Date: 2016-07-19
Citations: 141 A.3d 1275
Docket Number: 
Parties: COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent, v. Leon MILLS, Petitioner.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 141
Pages: 1275–1275

Head Matter:
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent, v. Leon MILLS, Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
July 19, 2016.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 19th day of July, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
Did not the trial court properly grant [PJetitioner's motion to dismiss pursuant to Pa.R.Crim.P. 600, where the time form a scheduling conference to a status listing consisted of time attributable to the conventional progression of a criminal case and was not judicial "delay," and was therefore correctly included in the calculation of the 365 days in which to bring [Petitioner to trial, and thus where more than 365 days elapsed before [Petitioner was brought to trial?