Case Name: Louis Robert YORK, Respondent, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, State of Missouri, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2013-12-10
Citations: 415 S.W.3d 761
Docket Number: No. ED 99535
Parties: Louis Robert YORK, Respondent, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, State of Missouri, Appellant.
Judges: Before MARY K. HOFF, P. J., KURT S. ODENWALD, J., and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 415
Pages: 761–761

Head Matter:
Louis Robert YORK, Respondent, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, State of Missouri, Appellant.
No. ED 99535.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Dec. 10, 2013.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Mary Highland Moore, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for appellant.
James William McGettigan, Jr., Eckel-amp Kuenzel, LLP, Washington, MO, for respondent.
Before MARY K. HOFF, P. J., KURT S. ODENWALD, J., and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The Director of Revenue appeals from the trial court's Judgment reinstating Louis Robert York's (York) driving privileges. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).