Case Name: MAX FERSLEW, Appellant, v. ANTONE ANDERSEN, Respondent
Court: District Court of Appeal of the State of California
Jurisdiction: California
Decision Date: 1936-01-23
Citations: 11 Cal. App. 2d 400
Docket Number: Civ. No. 10780
Parties: MAX FERSLEW, Appellant, v. ANTONE ANDERSEN, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: California Appellate Reports, Second Series
Volume: 11
Pages: 400–400

Head Matter:
[Civ. No. 10780.
Second Appellate District, Division Two.
January 23, 1936.]
MAX FERSLEW, Appellant, v. ANTONE ANDERSEN, Respondent.
W. J. Galbraith for Appellant.'
Butcher & Haines for Respondent.

Opinion:
McCOMB, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of respondent after a trial before a court without a jury.
Appellant has not observed the provision of Rule VIII, section 2, of this court, which requires that the question involved on appeal in a civil action be set forth on the first page of the opening brief without any other matter appearing thereon. (Rule VIII, sec. 2, p. 10, Rules of the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal of the State of California.)
In the instant case there is a total absence of a compliance with the foregoing rule. This court cannot assume the task of searching the record for the purpose of discovering errors not pointed out by counsel. It is the duty of counsel to comply with Rule VIII, supra, in its entirety.
For the foregoing reasons the appeal is dismissed.
Grail, P. J., and Wood, J., concurred.