Case Name: STATE of Minnesota, City of La Crescent, Respondent, v. Bruce Allan STOTESBERY, Appellant
Court: Minnesota Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Minnesota
Decision Date: 1985-01-22
Citations: 360 N.W.2d 678
Docket Number: No. C9-83-1520
Parties: STATE of Minnesota, City of La Crescent, Respondent, v. Bruce Allan STOTESBERY, Appellant.
Judges: Considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., PARKER, and FOLEY, JJ., with oral argument waived.
Reporter: North Western Reporter 2d
Volume: 360
Pages: 678–679

Head Matter:
STATE of Minnesota, City of La Crescent, Respondent, v. Bruce Allan STOTESBERY, Appellant.
No. C9-83-1520.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
Jan. 22, 1985.
Hubert H.' Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Linda F. Close, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, William Y. Von Arx, LaCrescent City Atty., Caledonia, for respondent.
Ross A. Phelps, La Crescent, for appellant.
Considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., PARKER, and FOLEY, JJ., with oral argument waived.

Opinion:
SUMMARY OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
Following a jury trial on August 2, 1983, appellant was convicted of D.W.I. under Minn.Stat. § 169.121, subd. 1(d) (1982). On appeal he claims that the Commissioner of Public Safety failed to promulgate standards for the nurse who drew a blood sample from him. We affirm.
DECISION
Appellant's contention was specifically addressed in Ouimby v. State, Department of Public Safety, 351 N.W.2d 629, 633 (Minn.1984), where the court held that "the training standards for those authorized to draw blood samples for later analysis for alcohol concentration promulgated by the Commissioner of Public Safety are sufficient to meet the statutory requirement." His conviction, therefore, is affirmed.
Affirmed.