Case Name: Willie F. PARSON, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Cecil LLOYD; A.J. Tomlinson, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-03-14
Citations: 221 F. App'x 289
Docket Number: No. 06-6732
Parties: Willie F. PARSON, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Cecil LLOYD; A.J. Tomlinson, Defendants—Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 221
Pages: 289–289

Head Matter:
Willie F. PARSON, III, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Cecil LLOYD; A.J. Tomlinson, Defendants—Appellees.
No. 06-6732.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 21, 2007.
Decided: March 14, 2007.
Willie F. Parson, III, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Willie F. Parson, III, appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (b)(1) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Parson v. Lloyd, No. 1:05-cv-01212-LMB (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 13, 2006 & entered Feb. 14, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.