Case Name: Robert Patrick SHARKEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2006-07-26
Citations: 933 So. 2d 1265
Docket Number: No. 2D06-967
Parties: Robert Patrick SHARKEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: CASANUEVA and WALLACE, JJ„ Concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 933
Pages: 1265–1266

Head Matter:
Robert Patrick SHARKEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D06-967.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
July 26, 2006.

Opinion:
CANADY, Judge.
Robert Patrick Sharkey appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) or, in the alternative, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In his motion, Sharkey raised three claims for relief. The postconviction court concluded that Sharkey failed to raise any claims cognizable under rule 3.800(a) and also denied relief pursuant to rule 3.850. We affirm the postconviction court's summary denial under rule 3.800(a). We affirm the post-conviction court's summary denial pursuant to rule 3.850 as it relates to claims one and three because they are without merit, but we reverse as to claim two. Because Sharkey's motion was properly sworn pursuant to Armey v. State, 880 So.2d 1269 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004), and claim two is not refuted by any portion of the record, we reverse the order denying the motion and remand to the postconviction court for further consideration of claim two pursuant to rule 3.850.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part.
CASANUEVA and WALLACE, JJ" Concur.