Case Name: Hugh MINGO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dan L. DOVE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-12-05
Citations: 22 F. App'x 228
Docket Number: No. 01-7678
Parties: Hugh MINGO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dan L. DOVE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 22
Pages: 228–228

Head Matter:
Hugh MINGO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dan L. DOVE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 01-7678.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 28, 2001.
Decided Dec. 5, 2001.
Hugh Mingo, pro se.
Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Hugh Mingo appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Mingo v. Dove, No. CA-01-2764-2-18AJ (D.S.C. Aug. 21, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.