Case Name: Lutjeharms, Commissioner of Education of Nebraska, et al. v. Rose, as Next Friend of Rose; United Van Lines, Inc. v. Hunter et al.; Cummings v. United States et al.; T. G. & Y. Stores, Inc. v. Lusby et al.; Sorensen v. Fitzgerald, Trustee, Landes v. Department of Justice; Marcone v. Penthouse International, Ltd.; Reid et al. v. Gholson et al.; Dow v. United Van Lines et al.; In re Walton, El Shahawy v. Sarasota County Public Hospital Board; Zlomke v. Flying Tiger Line, Inc., et al.; Roach v. Martin, Warden, et al.
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1985-12-02
Citations: 474 U.S. 1014
Docket Number: No. 84-1534; No. 84-1559; No. 84-1666; No. 84-1759; No. 84-1845; No. 84-1847; No. 84-1869; No. 84-1926; No. 84-1940; No. 84-1976; No. 84-2036; No. 84-6768; No. 84-6771
Parties: Lutjeharms, Commissioner of Education of Nebraska, et al. v. Rose, as Next Friend of Rose, United Van Lines, Inc. v. Hunter et al., Cummings v. United States et al., T. G. & Y. Stores, Inc. v. Lusby et al., Sorensen v. Fitzgerald, Trustee, Landes v. Department of Justice, Marcone v. Penthouse International, Ltd., Reid et al. v. Gholson et al., Dow v. United Van Lines et al., In re Walton, El Shahawy v. Sarasota County Public Hospital Board, Zlomke v. Flying Tiger Line, Inc., et al., Roach v. Martin, Warden, et al.,
Judges: 
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 474
Pages: 1014–1014

Head Matter:
No. 84-1534.
No. 84-1559.
No. 84-1666.
No. 84-1759.
No. 84-1845.
No. 84-1847.
No. 84-1869.
No. 84-1926.
No. 84-1940.
No. 84-1976.
No. 84-2036.
No. 84-6768.
No. 84-6771.
Lutjeharms, Commissioner of Education of Nebraska, et al. v. Rose, as Next Friend of Rose, United Van Lines, Inc. v. Hunter et al., Cummings v. United States et al., T. G. & Y. Stores, Inc. v. Lusby et al., Sorensen v. Fitzgerald, Trustee, Landes v. Department of Justice, Marcone v. Penthouse International, Ltd., Reid et al. v. Gholson et al., Dow v. United Van Lines et al., In re Walton, El Shahawy v. Sarasota County Public Hospital Board, Zlomke v. Flying Tiger Line, Inc., et al., Roach v. Martin, Warden, et al.,

Opinion:
ante, p. 817;
ante, p. 863;
ante, p. 817;
ante, p. 818;
ante, p. 918;
ante, p. 821;
ante, p. 864;
ante, p. 824;
ante, p. 825;
ante, p. 814;
ante, p. 829;
ante, p. 833; and
ante, p. 865. Petitions for rehearing denied.