Case Name: MARY E. SACIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. NEAL W. O'CONNOR, Defendant and Appellant
Court: New York Superior Court
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1879-11-11
Citations: 13 Jones & S. 633
Docket Number: 
Parties: MARY E. SACIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. NEAL W. O’CONNOR, Defendant and Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Reports of cases argued and determined in the Superior Court of the city of New York
Volume: 45
Pages: 633–633

Head Matter:
MARY E. SACIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. NEAL W. O’CONNOR, Defendant and Appellant.
Before Curtis, Ch. J., and Freedman, J.
Decided November 11, 1879.
Appeal by defendant- from an order denying his motion for a new trial and for the making of one Lockwood a party defendant.
The action is ejectment. It appeared in the papers that defendant withdrew his answer, and that judgment had been taken by consent.
A. J. Roe, attorney, and of counsel, for appellant.
Ira D. Warren, of counsel, for defendant.
Decision in this case affirmed by court-of appeals, December 16, 1879; 9 Weekly Dig. 397.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
Order affirmed with costs.