Case Name: Doyle WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1997-10-23
Citations: 700 So. 2d 470
Docket Number: No. 97-2004
Parties: Doyle WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: MINER, ALLEN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 700
Pages: 470–471

Head Matter:
Doyle WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 97-2004.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Oct. 23, 1997.
Appellant, pro se.
Robert Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant challenges an order by which his posteonviction motion, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, was denied as facially insufficient. His motion did not comply with subsection (c) of the rule because it was not sworn and failed to indicate whether he had filed a direct appeal or previous motion. See Groves v. State, 668 So.2d 1089 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). We therefore affirm, but do so without prejudice for him to refile a timely motion which complies with Rule 3.850.
MINER, ALLEN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.