Case Name: ANNAPOLIS SHIPPING COMPANY LIMITED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHINA NATIONAL MACHINERY IMPORT & EXPORT CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, Qingdao Shunhe Shipping Co., Ltd., Defendant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-12-01
Citations: 354 F. App'x 534
Docket Number: No. 09-0686-cv
Parties: ANNAPOLIS SHIPPING COMPANY LIMITED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHINA NATIONAL MACHINERY IMPORT & EXPORT CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, Qingdao Shunhe Shipping Co., Ltd., Defendant.
Judges: Present: JOSÉ A. CABRANES, CHESTER J. STRAUB and RICHARD C. WESLEY, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 354
Pages: 534–535

Head Matter:
ANNAPOLIS SHIPPING COMPANY LIMITED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHINA NATIONAL MACHINERY IMPORT & EXPORT CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, Qingdao Shunhe Shipping Co., Ltd., Defendant.
No. 09-0686-cv.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Dec. 1, 2009.
Jack A. Greenbaum, Blank Rome LLP, New York, NY, for Appellant.
Leroy Corsa, (George M. Chalos, on the brief) Chalos & Co., P.C., Oyster Bay, NY, for Appellee.
Present: JOSÉ A. CABRANES, CHESTER J. STRAUB and RICHARD C. WESLEY, Circuit Judges.
The Clerk of Court is directed to amend the official caption to conform to the listing of the parties stated above.

Opinion:
SUMMARY ORDER
Plaintiff Annapolis Shipping Company Limited appeals from a February 23, 2009 order of the District Court. While this appeal was sub judice, we decided Shipping Corp. of India Ltd. v. Jaldhi Overseas Pte Ltd., 585 F.3d 58 (2d Cir.2009), in which we overruled Winter Storm Shipping, Ltd. v. TPI, 310 F.3d 263 (2d Cir. 2002), and held that electronic fund transfers being processed by intermediary banks are no longer subject to attachment under Rule B. In another recent decision, Hawknet, Ltd. v. Overseas Shipping Agencies, No. 09-2128-cv, 587 F.3d 127, 2009 WL 3790654 (2d Cir. Nov.13, 2009), we held that our decision in Shipping Corp. of India applies retroactively. Accordingly, we VACATE the District Court's order and REMAND the matter to the District Court with instructions to enter an order to show cause why it should not dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction in light of these recent decisions.