Case Name: In re Robert WILKEY, Respondent
Court: District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: District of Columbia
Decision Date: 2014-11-26
Citations: 130 A.3d 950
Docket Number: No. 14-BG-1000
Parties: In re Robert WILKEY, Respondent.
Judges: BEFORE: GLICKMAN, Associate Judge, and NEBEKER and RUIZ, Senior Judges.
Reporter: West's Atlantic Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 130
Pages: 950–950

Head Matter:
In re Robert WILKEY, Respondent.
No. 14-BG-1000.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Filed Nov. 26, 2014.
BEFORE: GLICKMAN, Associate Judge, and NEBEKER and RUIZ, Senior Judges.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM
On consideration of the certified order suspending respondent from the practice of law in the state of Pennsylvania for a total of 30 months, this court's September 24, 2014, order directing respondent to show cause why the functionally equivalent discipline in the form of a suspension for a period of 30 months with his reinstatement conditioned upon a showing of fitness should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file a response to this court's order to show cause but did file a timely affidavit as required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is
ORDERED that Robert Wilkey is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a period of 30 months, nunc pro tunc to September 24, 2104. Reinstatement is contingent upon a showing of fitness. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C.2010); In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007); In re Coleman, 919 A.2d 1135, 1137 n. 4 (D.C.2007).