Case Name: Sirak MANBEGIROT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Marie VARGO, Warden, Sussex II State Prison, Respondent-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-04-18
Citations: 685 F. App'x 226
Docket Number: No. 16-7599
Parties: Sirak MANBEGIROT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Marie VARGO, Warden, Sussex II State Prison, Respondent-Appellee.
Judges: Before KING, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 685
Pages: 226–226

Head Matter:
Sirak MANBEGIROT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Marie VARGO, Warden, Sussex II State Prison, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 16-7599
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 30, 2017
Decided: April 18, 2017
Sirak Manbegirot, Appellant Pro Se. Craig Stallard, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before KING, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Sirak Manbegirot seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.
We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Manbegirot has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certifícate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauper-is, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED