Case Name: Arnulfo Andres LOPEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Kenneth MACK, Individually and in His Capacity as Chief of Police of the Galveston Police Department; Galveston Police Department; City of Galveston; Officer Clayton Pope; Officer Matthew Whiting; Sergeant Joel Caldwell; Officer Archie Chapman; Unknown Galveston Police Officer, also known as Whitey, DefendantsAppellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-09-22
Citations: 293 F. App'x 355
Docket Number: No. 07-40610
Parties: Arnulfo Andres LOPEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Kenneth MACK, Individually and in His Capacity as Chief of Police of the Galveston Police Department; Galveston Police Department; City of Galveston; Officer Clayton Pope; Officer Matthew Whiting; Sergeant Joel Caldwell; Officer Archie Chapman; Unknown Galveston Police Officer, also known as Whitey, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 293
Pages: 355–356

Head Matter:
Arnulfo Andres LOPEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Kenneth MACK, Individually and in His Capacity as Chief of Police of the Galveston Police Department; Galveston Police Department; City of Galveston; Officer Clayton Pope; Officer Matthew Whiting; Sergeant Joel Caldwell; Officer Archie Chapman; Unknown Galveston Police Officer, also known as Whitey, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 07-40610.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Sept. 22, 2008.
Valorie Wells Davenport, Houston, Texas, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
William S. Helfand, Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Martin, Houston, TX, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before GARZA and DENNIS, Circuit Judges, and MILLS, District Judge.
Chief Judge of the Northern District of Mississippi, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Plaintiff-Appellant Arnulfo Andres Lopez ("Lopez") appeals from a December 13, 2006, 2006 WL 3702895 Memorandum Opinion and Order of the District Court and an April 11, 2007, 2007 WL 1108736, Memorandum Opinion and Order of the District Court. Together, these orders granted summary judgment for Defendants-Appellees and dismissed all of Lopez's federal law claims and all of Lopez's state law claims except for one state law malicious prosecution claim, which the District Court remanded to state court. We have reviewed the briefs, the entire record on appeal, and the applicable law and have heard oral arguments of counsel. Finding no error in the District Court's disposition of the case, we AFFIRM essentially for the reasons stated by the District Court in its written opinions.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.