Case Name: W.R. GRACE AND COMPANY, Creative Food'N Fun Company, Appellants, v. MULTI RESTAURANT CONCEPTS, INC., Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1987-03-24
Citations: 504 So. 2d 493
Docket Number: No. 86-3159
Parties: W.R. GRACE AND COMPANY, Creative Food’N Fun Company, Appellants, v. MULTI RESTAURANT CONCEPTS, INC., Appellee.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and BASKIN, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 504
Pages: 493–493

Head Matter:
W.R. GRACE AND COMPANY, Creative Food’N Fun Company, Appellants, v. MULTI RESTAURANT CONCEPTS, INC., Appellee.
No. 86-3159.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 24, 1987.
Rehearing Denied April 20, 1987.
Therrel, Baisden & Meyer Weiss and Julian R. Benjamin, Miami Beach, for appellants.
Thomson, Zeder, Bohrer, Werth & Ra-zook and Evan K. Kaplan, Miami, for appel-lee.
Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and BASKIN, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Finding no abuse of discretion in the trial court's ruling that enforcement of the contract would be unreasonable and unjust; that the forum designated in the contract was chosen because of the defendants' overwhelming bargaining power; and that enforcement of the choice of forum clause would contravene the strong public policy of Texas, we affirm the trial court's Order Denying Re-Stated Motion to Dismiss. Manrique v. Fabbri, 493 So.2d 437 (Fla.1986); Haws & Garrett General Contractors, Inc. v. Panhandle Custom Decorators & Supply, Inc., 500 So.2d 204 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).
Affirmed.