Case Name: In re ESTATE of Percy EDMUNDS, a/k/a Percy S. Edmunds, Deceased
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1968-09-12
Citations: 214 So. 2d 65
Docket Number: No. 1845
Parties: In re ESTATE of Percy EDMUNDS, a/k/a Percy S. Edmunds, Deceased.
Judges: WALDEN, C. J., and REED and OWEN, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 214
Pages: 65–65

Head Matter:
In re ESTATE of Percy EDMUNDS, a/k/a Percy S. Edmunds, Deceased.
No. 1845.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.
Sept. 12, 1968.
Rehearing Denied Oct. 10, 1968.
Richard W. Riddle, of Coleman, Leonard, Morrison & Riddle, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants Elizabeth H. Edmunds, as con-servatrix of the Estate of Vivian Edmunds, and Beth McCoy.
Warren O. Windle, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees Thomas Fillmore Lupton and Laura Lee Lupton, as Executor and Executrix of the Estate of Percy Edmunds, deceased.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellants attack the probate of a certain Will, saying that the decedent lacked testamentary capacity and that said Will was procured by undue influence. We have examined the record in the light of the respective briefs and find that the probate judge's rulings are supported by substantial competent evidence and that there is no showing that the probate court judge misapprehended the legal effect of the proofs. In re Kiggins' Estate, Fla. 1953, 67 So.2d 915; In re Aldrich's Estate, 1941, 148 Fla. 121, 3 So.2d 856; and Tice v. Cralle, 1921, 81 Fla. 140, 87 So. 314.
WALDEN, C. J., and REED and OWEN, JJ., concur.