Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Mitchell Ray KING, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-03-09
Citations: 679 F. App'x 370
Docket Number: No. 16-10585 Summary Calendar
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Mitchell Ray KING, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
Judges: Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 679
Pages: 370–371

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Mitchell Ray KING, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
No. 16-10585 Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed March 9, 2017
James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee
Mitchell Ray King, Jr., Pro Se
Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Mitchell Ray King, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). King has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.