Case Name: In the Matter of Kendra R. Erie County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Kevin R., Sr., Appellant. In the Matter of Kevin R. Erie County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Kevin R., Sr., Appellant. In the Matter of Kerry R. Erie County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Kevin R., Sr., Appellant. In the Matter of Kory R. Erie County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Kevin R., Sr., Appellant. In the Matter of Kody R. Erie County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Kevin R., Sr., Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1998-03-13
Citations: 248 A.D.2d 1030
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Kendra R. Erie County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Kevin R., Sr., Appellant. In the Matter of Kevin R. Erie County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Kevin R., Sr., Appellant. In the Matter of Kerry R. Erie County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Kevin R., Sr., Appellant. In the Matter of Kory R. Erie County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Kevin R., Sr., Appellant. In the Matter of Kody R. Erie County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Kevin R., Sr., Appellant.
Judges: Present— Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wisner, Callahan and Balio, JJ.
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 248
Pages: 1030–1030

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Kendra R. Erie County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Kevin R., Sr., Appellant. In the Matter of Kevin R. Erie County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Kevin R., Sr., Appellant. In the Matter of Kerry R. Erie County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Kevin R., Sr., Appellant. In the Matter of Kory R. Erie County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Kevin R., Sr., Appellant. In the Matter of Kody R. Erie County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Kevin R., Sr., Appellant.
[670 NYS2d 125]

Opinion:
—Motion for poor person relief and assignment of counsel denied and appeals dismissed. Memorandum: Respondent's counsel treated the orders extending placement as default orders and moved to vacate the defaults; that motion was denied. An order denying a motion to vacate a default is appealable (Walsh v Syms, 51 AD2d 645; see also, CPLR 5015 [a]), whereas an order entered upon default is not (see, Matter of Natanya Sharay G., 232 AD2d 487).
Present— Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wisner, Callahan and Balio, JJ.