Case Name: Gary NUNGESSER, Janice Nungesser and Linda McCracken Nungesser, Individually and Derivatively on Behalf of Gerneral Marine Catering Company, Inc. v. William A. NUNGESSER, William H. Nungesser, Jr., Eric Nungesser, Hugh Nungesser, General Marine Catering Company, Inc., General Marine Offshore, Inc., General Marine Leasing, Inc., and John Does(1-20)
Court: Louisiana Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Louisiana
Decision Date: 2002-06-07
Citations: 818 So. 2d 778
Docket Number: No. 2002-CC-1027
Parties: Gary NUNGESSER, Janice Nungesser and Linda McCracken Nungesser, Individually and Derivatively on Behalf of Gerneral Marine Catering Company, Inc. v. William A. NUNGESSER, William H. Nungesser, Jr., Eric Nungesser, Hugh Nungesser, General Marine Catering Company, Inc., General Marine Offshore, Inc., General Marine Leasing, Inc., and John Does(1-20).
Judges: 
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 818
Pages: 778–778

Head Matter:
Gary NUNGESSER, Janice Nungesser and Linda McCracken Nungesser, Individually and Derivatively on Behalf of Gerneral Marine Catering Company, Inc. v. William A. NUNGESSER, William H. Nungesser, Jr., Eric Nungesser, Hugh Nungesser, General Marine Catering Company, Inc., General Marine Offshore, Inc., General Marine Leasing, Inc., and John Does(1-20).
No. 2002-CC-1027.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
June 7, 2002.

Opinion:
In re Nungesser, William A. et al.; Nungesser, William H. Jr.; Nungesser, Eric; Nungesser, Hugh; General Marine Leasing Inc.;' — Defendants; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. B, No. 99-5506; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2002-C-0161.
Granted. In light of the complexity of this discovery ruling, it appears a written judgment was contemplated by the trial court and the parties. Therefore, the ruling at issue for purposes of Rule 4-3 was the written judgment of December 17, 2001. Kosmitis v. Bailey, 96-1573 (La.10/4/96), 680 So.2d 1167. Relator's notice of intent was filed within thirty days of that date, and its writ application was filed within the deadline set by the trial court. Accordingly, the application is remanded to the court of appeal for consideration on the merits.