Case Name: James HIGDON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1990-08-08
Citations: 564 So. 2d 650
Docket Number: No. 89-2228
Parties: James HIGDON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: ANSTEAD and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., and KAHN, MARTIN D., Associate Judge, concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 564
Pages: 650–650

Head Matter:
James HIGDON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 89-2228.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Aug. 8, 1990.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Robert Friedman, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard E. Doran, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm appellant's convictions and sentence. We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in assessing thirty (30) excess points against appellant on the sentencing guidelines scoresheet. However, even with the deletion of these points the trial court's sentence is well within the permitted and recommended range of sentences set out in the guidelines.
ANSTEAD and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., and KAHN, MARTIN D., Associate Judge, concur.