Case Name: William Sochefsky, Respondent, Appellant, v. Joseph Dinowitz and Others, Defendants, Impleaded with C. N. & J. Corporation, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1922-01
Citations: 200 A.D. 878
Docket Number: 
Parties: William Sochefsky, Respondent, Appellant, v. Joseph Dinowitz and Others, Defendants, Impleaded with C. N. & J. Corporation, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 200
Pages: 878–878

Head Matter:
William Sochefsky, Respondent, Appellant, v. Joseph Dinowitz and Others, Defendants, Impleaded with C. N. & J. Corporation, Appellant.

Opinion:
Judgment and order reversed and a new trial granted, without costs, on the ground that the apparent finding by the jury that the defendant C. N. & J. Corporation was responsible for the alleged conversion of the plaintiff's property was against the weight of the evidence, and on the further ground that the apparent finding of the jury that the other defendants were not responsible for the alleged conversion is likewise against the weight of the evidence. Blackmar, P. J., Rich, Kelly, Kelby and Young, JJ., concur.