Case Name: Robert MATT, Jr., Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2000-09-19
Citations: 30 S.W.3d 837
Docket Number: No. ED 77088
Parties: Robert MATT, Jr., Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
Judges: Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., PAUL J. SIMON, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 30
Pages: 837–838

Head Matter:
Robert MATT, Jr., Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
No. ED 77088.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Sept. 19, 2000.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 30, 2000.
Application for Transfer Denied Dec. 5, 2000.
Mark A. Grothoff, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Adriane D. Crouse, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for Respondent.
Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., PAUL J. SIMON, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Robert Matt, Jr. ("Movant") appeals from a judgment denying his request for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15. Movant claims ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court's judgment is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. Ail rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P. 2000, unless otherwise indicated.