Case Name: The State, ex rel. City of Cincinnati, v. Moulton et al., Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, et al.
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 1953-12-23
Citations: 160 Ohio St. 397
Docket Number: No. 33612
Parties: The State, ex rel. City of Cincinnati, v. Moulton et al., Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, et al.
Judges: Weygandt, C. J., Middleton, Taet, Hart, Zimmerman, Stewart and Lamneck, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, New Service
Volume: 160
Pages: 397–398

Head Matter:
The State, ex rel. City of Cincinnati, v. Moulton et al., Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, et al.
(No. 33612
Decided December 23, 1953.)
Mr. Henry M. Bruestle, city solicitor, Mr. James W. Farrell, Jr., and Mr. Robert J. White, for relator.
Mr. C. William O’Neill, attorney general, Mr. James M. Burtch, Jr., and Mr. Everett H. Krueger, Jr., for respondent Public Utilities Commission.
Messrs. Frost & Jacobs, Mr. Charles G. Puchta, Jr., and Mr. George C. McConnaughey, for respondent The Cincinnati & Suburban Bell Telephone Company.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The cause is submitted on demurrers to respondents' answers to relator's petition by which relator seeks a remedy available by appeal, which appeal it has taken. A writ of mandamus may not be invoked as a substitute for the remedy of appeal. The demurrers to the answers are overruled and the writ is denied. State, ex rel. Stein, v. Sohngen, Dir., 147 Ohio St., 359, 71 N. E. (2d), 483; State, ex rel. Blackburn, v. Court of Appeals for Franklin County, 154 Ohio St., 237, 95 N. E. (2d), 273; State, ex rel. Blackburn, v. Court of Appeals for Belmont County, 154 Ohio St., 464, 96 N. E. (2d), 297.
Writ denied.
Weygandt, C. J., Middleton, Taet, Hart, Zimmerman, Stewart and Lamneck, JJ., concur.