Case Name: Teddy Lyn FRAZIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1978-10-05
Citations: 362 So. 2d 1048
Docket Number: No. KK-24
Parties: Teddy Lyn FRAZIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: McCORD, C. J., and BOYER and MILLS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 362
Pages: 1048–1048

Head Matter:
Teddy Lyn FRAZIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. KK-24.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Oct. 5, 1978.
Teddy Lyn Frazier, in pro per.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant challenged the eyewitness identification at his trial by way of a motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence. (Rule 3.850, Fla.R.Crim.P.) The trial court denied the motion without an evidentiary hearing and we affirm.
The testimony concerning the pre-trial line-ups and the identification at trial was properly presented to the jury for resolution. Furthermore, the issue of the sufficiency of the eyewitness identification could have been raised on direct appeal. Von Eberstein v. State, 270 So.2d 444 (Fla. 1st D.C.A. 1972).
We, therefore, AFFIRM.
McCORD, C. J., and BOYER and MILLS, JJ., concur.