Case Name: Andrew BELL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1984-12-18
Citations: 460 So. 2d 561
Docket Number: No. 83-2009
Parties: Andrew BELL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 460
Pages: 561–562

Head Matter:
Andrew BELL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 83-2009.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec. 18, 1984.
Rehearing Denied March 19,1985.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and R. James Pelstring, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and G. Bart Bill-brough, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and JORGENSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of convictions and sentence under review is affirmed upon a holding that (1) the trial court committed no error in denying the defendant's motion to suppress the in-court identifications of the defendant by the witness Lucy Sanchez because utterly no showing was made below that any unnecessarily suggestive identification procedures were used by the state within the meaning of the standards established in Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188, 93 S.Ct. 375, 34 L.Ed.2d 401 (1972); (2) the trial court committed no error in denying the defendant's motion to discharge based on an alleged speedy trial violation, State v. Bassham, 352 So.2d 55 (Fla.1977); and (3) the trial court committed no error in denying a motion for mistrial based on a witness' trial reference to a police photo lineup, as a subsequent cautionary instruction cured the error under the circumstances of this case. See Loftin v. State, 273 So.2d 70 (Fla.1973); Jones v. State, 453 So.2d 1192 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).
Affirmed.