Case Name: In the Matter of Harold O'Neill, Appellant, v. George Beisheim, Jr., as a Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, et al., Respondents
Court: New York Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1976-06-17
Citations: 39 N.Y.2d 924
Docket Number: 
Parties: In the Matter of Harold O’Neill, Appellant, v George Beisheim, Jr., as a Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.
Judges: 
Reporter: New York Reports
Volume: 39
Pages: 924–925

Head Matter:
In the Matter of Harold O’Neill, Appellant, v George Beisheim, Jr., as a Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.
Argued May 6, 1976;
decided June 17, 1976
Henry J. Boitel for appellant.
Carl A. Vergari, District Attorney (Janet Cunard of counsel), respondent pro se.

Opinion:
Judgment affirmed, without costs. Prohibition is not now warranted where the trial sought to be prohibited has been held and where the issues tendered may be raised on the direct appeal following such trial now pending in the Appellate Division.
Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke.