Case Name: In re Olah
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohio
Decision Date: 2000-12-20
Citations: 90 Ohio St. 3d 1491
Docket Number: 00-1968
Parties: In re Olah.
Judges: F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.
Reporter: Ohio State Reports, Third Service
Volume: 90
Pages: 1491–1492

Head Matter:
00-1968.
In re Olah.

Opinion:
Lorain App. No. 99CA007318. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals' Journal Entry filed October 5, 2000, at page 2:
"Whether the language of R.C. 2151.35(B)(1) requires a juvenile court to dismiss a complaint without prejudice on its own motion when «the court cannot hold the dispositional hearing within ninety days of the filing of the complaint."
F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.
The conflict cases are In re Kutzli (1991), 71 Ohio App.3d 843, 595 N.E.2d 1026; In re Bailey (Apr. 17, 1998), Lucas App. No. L-96-363, unreported, 1998 WL 196287; and In re N.B. (Apr. 15, 1996), Butler App. Nos. CA95-02-031, CA95-03-056 and CA95-06-017, unreported, 1996 WL 174546.
Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 00-1785, In re Olah, Lorain App. No. 99CA007318.