Case Name: Jamar A. CANNON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Edward HULL; Phyllis Back, Major; Darryl Turner, Captain of Security; Captain Hickey; D. Lubeke; Officer Stephan; Sergeant Berry; Michelle Lewis, Director of Inmate Services, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-07-13
Citations: 693 F. App'x 187
Docket Number: No. 17-6167
Parties: Jamar A. CANNON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Edward HULL; Phyllis Back, Major; Darryl Turner, Captain of Security; Captain Hickey; D. Lubeke; Officer Stephan; Sergeant Berry; Michelle Lewis, Director of Inmate Services, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 693
Pages: 187–187

Head Matter:
Jamar A. CANNON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Edward HULL; Phyllis Back, Major; Darryl Turner, Captain of Security; Captain Hickey; D. Lubeke; Officer Stephan; Sergeant Berry; Michelle Lewis, Director of Inmate Services, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 17-6167
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 22, 2017
Decided: July 13, 2017
Jamar A. Cannon, Appellant Pro Se. Kristen Rodrigue Jurjevieh, Jeff W. Ro-sen, PENDER & COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jamar A. Cannon seeks to appeal the district court's order granting in part and denying in part Defendants' motion for summary judgment. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Coup., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Cannon seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED