Case Name: William A. BACHER, Joseph H. Sage, etc., Appellants, v. Joseph Patrick PATENCIO et al., Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1966-12-01
Citations: 368 F.2d 1010
Docket Number: No. 19682
Parties: William A. BACHER, Joseph H. Sage, etc., Appellants, v. Joseph Patrick PATENCIO et al., Appellees.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 2d Series
Volume: 368
Pages: 1010–1012

Head Matter:
William A. BACHER, Joseph H. Sage, etc., Appellants, v. Joseph Patrick PATENCIO et al., Appellees.
No. 19682.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
Dec. 1, 1966.
Saul Ruskin, Palm Springs, Francis H. O’Neill, William G. Coskran, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellants.
Raymond C. Simpson, Laurence M. Watson, Long Beach, Cal., James Hollowell, Palm Springs, Cal., for appellees.
Before CHAMBERS, BARNES, and ELY, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The majority agrees with the reasoning of Judge Byrne in the court below. 232 F.Supp. 939 (S.D.Cal.1964). The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.