Case Name: Ibrahim Hassan NUR, Petitioner and Appellant v. STATE of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
Court: North Dakota Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: North Dakota
Decision Date: 2018-02-22
Citations: 906 N.W.2d 910
Docket Number: No. 20170349
Parties: Ibrahim Hassan NUR, Petitioner and Appellant v. STATE of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
Judges: [¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Reporter: North Western Reporter 2d
Volume: 906
Pages: 910–910

Head Matter:
2018 ND 40
Ibrahim Hassan NUR, Petitioner and Appellant v. STATE of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
No. 20170349
Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Filed 2/22/2018
Laura C. Ringsak, Bismarck,-ND 58501, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.
' Tracy E. -Hines (argued), Assistant State’s Attorney, and Tristan J. Van de Streek (on brief), Assistant State’s Attorney, Fargo, ND 58108-2806, for respondent and, appellee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Ibrahim Hassan Nur appeals from the district court's order denying his application for post-conviction relief. Nur argues he did not voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently waive his right to counsel, and he argues he received ineffective assistance of counsel. The district court did not err in summarily denying Nut's application for post-conviction relief for misuse of process on the issue of his waiver to the right to counsel. Also, the district court did not err in denying Nur's application for post-conviction relief based on ineffective assistance of counsel and its findings of fact were not clearly erroneous. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (6).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Jon J. Jensen
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers
Jerod E. Tufte