Case Name: BERRY v. STATE
Court: Texas Courts of Civil Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1935-02-27
Citations: 79 S.W.2d 891
Docket Number: No. 9527
Parties: BERRY v. STATE.
Judges: 
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 79
Pages: 891–891

Head Matter:
BERRY v. STATE.
No. 9527.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.
Feb. 27, 1935.
Conger, Low" & Spears, of San Antonio, for appellant.. • ,
John R. Shook and W. C. Linden, Sr., both of San Antonio, for the State.

Opinion:
BICKETT, Chief Justice.
The order of the district court, from which an appeal has been attempted to be perfected, was a temporary restraining order and not a temporary injunction.
Under our practice, there is no appeal from a temporary restraining order. Article 4662, Revised Civil Statutes of Texas (1925); Riggins v. Thompson, 96 Tex. 154, 71 S. W. 14; Ex parte Zuccaro, 106 Tex. 197, 163 S. W. 579, Ann. Cas. 1917B, 121; Lark v. Coyle (Tex. Civ. App.) 260 S. W. 1107; Johnson v. Sunset Stores, Inc. (Tex. Civ. App.) 27 S.W.(2d) 644.
The appeal is therefore dismissed for want of jurisdiction.