Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Michael Bradley FALKIN, Defendant/Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 2013-09-17
Citations: 408 S.W.3d 802
Docket Number: No. ED 99015
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Michael Bradley FALKIN, Defendant/Appellant.
Judges: Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., KURT S. ODENWALD, J., and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, J.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Third Series
Volume: 408
Pages: 802–802

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Michael Bradley FALKIN, Defendant/Appellant.
No. ED 99015.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Sept. 17, 2013.
Craig A. Johnston, Missouri Public Defender Office, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Karen Louise Kramer, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., KURT S. ODENWALD, J., and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, J.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Michael Bradley Falkin appeals from the judgment upon his conviction by a jury for one count of child molestation in the first degree, in violation of Section 566.067, RSMo 2000; one count of statutory sodomy in the first degree, in violation of Section 566.062; and one count of statutory rape in the first degree, in violation of Section 566.032, for which he was sentenced to concurrent terms of fifteen, twenty-five, and twenty-five years' imprisonment, respectively. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
. Unless otherwise indicated, all further statutory references are to RSMo 2000, as amended.