Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Victor LaVaughn WILMOTH, Appellant
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1975-02-28
Citations: 520 S.W.2d 185
Docket Number: No. 9937
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Victor LaVaughn WILMOTH, Appellant.
Judges: All concur.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 520
Pages: 185–185

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Victor LaVaughn WILMOTH, Appellant.
No. 9937.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Springfield District.
Feb. 28, 1975.
John C. Danforth, Atty. Gen., K. Preston Dean, II, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Paul W. Seabaugh, Kennett, for appellant.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Appellant has purported to appeal from the trial court's revocation of his probation.
Appellant's jurisdictional statement states: "Appellant pleaded guilty of tampering with a trailer, a felony . Imposition of sentence was suspended and defendant was placed on supervised probation. During his probationary period, defendant was arrested and charged with first degree burglary. The Court held a hearing and revoked defendant's probation and sentenced defendant. This appeal is to contest the correctness of the Court's revocation order."
The right of appeal is statutory [Rule 81.01, V.A.M.R.], and § 549.141, RSMo 1969, V.A.M.S., bars our review by direct appeal of the revocation of appellant's probation. State v. Camden, 514 S.W.2d 181 (Mo.App.1974).
Determining, sua sponte, that we have no appellate jurisdiction, appellant's appeal is dismissed.
All concur.