Case Name: David A. CAMPBELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John E. POTTER, Postmaster General, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-10-04
Citations: 201 F. App'x 961
Docket Number: No. 06-1616
Parties: David A. CAMPBELL, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. John E. POTTER, Postmaster General, Defendant—Appellee.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 201
Pages: 961–961

Head Matter:
David A. CAMPBELL, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. John E. POTTER, Postmaster General, Defendant—Appellee.
No. 06-1616.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 28, 2006.
Decided: Oct. 4, 2006.
David A. Campbell, Appellant pro se. Anna Mills Wagoner, United States Attorney; Joan Brodish Binkley, Office Of The United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
David A. Campbell appeals the district court's order granting Defendant judgment in this employment discrimination and retaliation action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Campbell v. Potter, No. 1:04-cv-00989-JAB (M.D.N.C. Mar. 28, 2006; Apr. 20, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.