Case Name: Joseph D. WASSIL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James F. SCHNEIDER, Judge, individually and in his official capacity; Ellen M. Heller, Judge, individually and in her official capacity; B. George Ballman, Trustee; Joel P. Goldberger, Trustee; Gloria Allender, Commissioner; Jimmie L. Foxworth, Commissioner; Frank M. Conaway, Clerk; James Piper, Realtor; P. Wesley Foster, Jr., Realtor; Wesley P. Hairston, Realtor; Bob Thomas, Defendant Piper's Agent; Nicholas J. Delpizzo, III, Attorney, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-06-08
Citations: 11 F. App'x 308
Docket Number: No. 01-1325
Parties: Joseph D. WASSIL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James F. SCHNEIDER, Judge, individually and in his official capacity; Ellen M. Heller, Judge, individually and in her official capacity; B. George Ballman, Trustee; Joel P. Goldberger, Trustee; Gloria Allender, Commissioner; Jimmie L. Foxworth, Commissioner; Frank M. Conaway, Clerk; James Piper, Realtor; P. Wesley Foster, Jr., Realtor; Wesley P. Hairston, Realtor; Bob Thomas, Defendant Piper’s Agent; Nicholas J. Delpizzo, III, Attorney, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 11
Pages: 308–308

Head Matter:
Joseph D. WASSIL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James F. SCHNEIDER, Judge, individually and in his official capacity; Ellen M. Heller, Judge, individually and in her official capacity; B. George Ballman, Trustee; Joel P. Goldberger, Trustee; Gloria Allender, Commissioner; Jimmie L. Foxworth, Commissioner; Frank M. Conaway, Clerk; James Piper, Realtor; P. Wesley Foster, Jr., Realtor; Wesley P. Hairston, Realtor; Bob Thomas, Defendant Piper’s Agent; Nicholas J. Delpizzo, III, Attorney, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 01-1325.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 31, 2001.
Decided June 8, 2001.
Joseph D. Wassil, pro se.
Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Joseph D. Wassil appeals from the district court's order denying his petition for a writ of mandamus. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wassil v. Schneider, No. CA-01-338-L (D.Md. Feb. 12, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.