Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Nicolas Antonio GUTIERREZ LOPEZ, also known as Nicolas A. Gutierrez, also known as Nicolas Antonio Gutierrez, also known as Nicolas Antonio Gutierrez-Lopez, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2012-04-25
Citations: 467 F. App'x 316
Docket Number: No. 11-20340
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Nicolas Antonio GUTIERREZ LOPEZ, also known as Nicolas A. Gutierrez, also known as Nicolas Antonio Gutierrez, also known as Nicolas Antonio Gutierrez-Lopez, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 467
Pages: 316–316

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Nicolas Antonio GUTIERREZ LOPEZ, also known as Nicolas A. Gutierrez, also known as Nicolas Antonio Gutierrez, also known as Nicolas Antonio Gutierrez-Lopez, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-20340
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 25, 2012.
Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Kenneth W. McGuire, Esq., McGuire Law Firm, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Nicolas Antonio Gutierrez Lopez (Gutierrez) pleaded guilty of being present in the United States illegally following deportation after conviction of an aggravated felony. In this appeal, Gutierrez contends that the district court erred in increasing his Sentencing Guidelines offense level by 16 levels based on its determination that Gutierrez's 2007 Texas conviction of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon constituted a crime of violence under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii).
Because Gutierrez's Texas conviction of aggravated assault qualified as a conviction for the enumerated offense of aggravated assault, the district court did not err in imposing the 16-level enhancement. See United States v. Guillen-Alvarez, 489 F.3d 197, 199-201 (5th Cir.2007); see also U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2, comment. (n.l(B)(iii)). The judgment is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cír. R. 47.5.4.