Case Name: NEUTRINO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee, and Richard T. Redano, Counterclaim-Defendant Appellee, v. SONOSITE, INC., Defendant/Counterclaimant Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-03-14
Citations: 269 F. App'x 976
Docket Number: No. 2007-1325
Parties: NEUTRINO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee, and Richard T. Redano, Counterclaim-Defendant Appellee, v. SONOSITE, INC., Defendant/Counterclaimant Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 269
Pages: 976–977

Head Matter:
NEUTRINO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee, and Richard T. Redano, Counterclaim-Defendant Appellee, v. SONOSITE, INC., Defendant/Counterclaimant Appellant.
No. 2007-1325.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
March 14, 2008.
William C. Norvell, Jr., Beirne, Maynard & Parsons, L.L.P., of Houston, TX, argued for plaintiff/eounterelaim defendant-appellee and counterclaim-defendant appellee. With him on the brief were Scott D. Marrs and Brian T. Bagley.
Paul E. Krieger, Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P., of Houston, TX, argued for defendant/eounterclaimant-appellant. With him on the brief were Lucas T. Elliot, William J. Boyce, and C. Erik Hawes.
NEWMAN, FRIEDMAN, and SCHALL, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Judgment
PER CURIAM.
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
AFFIRMED. See. Fed. Civ. R. 36.