Case Name: John Alan MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Kershaw Correctional Institution; Patricia Cook; Darren Seward, co-conspirators, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-01-27
Citations: 363 F. App'x 245
Docket Number: No. 09-7751
Parties: John Alan MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Kershaw Correctional Institution; Patricia Cook; Darren Seward, co-conspirators, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 363
Pages: 245–246

Head Matter:
John Alan MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Kershaw Correctional Institution; Patricia Cook; Darren Seward, co-conspirators, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 09-7751.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 19, 2010.
Decided: Jan. 27, 2010.
John Alan Miller, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
John Alan Miller appeals the district court's orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil rights action and denying reconsideration of that order. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's Brief, see 4th Cir. R. 34(b), and Miller's brief alleges no error committed by the district court. We therefore find Miller has forfeited appellate review. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's orders. Further, we deny Miller's motion for transcripts at Government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.