Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Cipriano VALENCIA-MANRIQUEZ, also known as Cipriano Valencia Martinez, also known as Cipriano Valencia Marquez, also known as Cipriano Marquez, also known as Cipriano Manriques Valencia, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2015-12-15
Citations: 624 F. App'x 264
Docket Number: No. 15-10427
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Cipriano VALENCIA-MANRIQUEZ, also known as Cipriano Valencia Martinez, also known as Cipriano Valencia Marquez, also known as Cipriano Marquez, also known as Cipriano Manriques Valencia, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before JONES, SOUTHWICK, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 624
Pages: 264–265

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Cipriano VALENCIA-MANRIQUEZ, also known as Cipriano Valencia Martinez, also known as Cipriano Valencia Marquez, also known as Cipriano Marquez, also known as Cipriano Manriques Valencia, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15-10427
Conference Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 15, 2015.
James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Cipriano Valencia-Manriquez, Cl, McRae Helena, GA, pro se.
James Matthew Wright, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Gabriel Reyes, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before JONES, SOUTHWICK, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Cipriano Valencia-Manriquez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Valencia-Manriquez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cm. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.