Case Name: Juan Miguel ROCHA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1997-08-20
Citations: 697 So. 2d 1021
Docket Number: No. 96-3573
Parties: Juan Miguel ROCHA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before NESBITT, JORGENSON and SORONDO, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 697
Pages: 1021–1021

Head Matter:
Juan Miguel ROCHA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 96-3573.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Aug. 20, 1997.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Lisa Walsh, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Mark Rosenblatt, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before NESBITT, JORGENSON and SORONDO, JJ.

Opinion:
Confession of Error
PER CURIAM.
Upon the State's proper confession of error, we vacate the sentence imposed by the trial court and remand for resentencing. The sentencing guidelines seoresheet improperly classified two counts as level 7 offenses, when the offenses — unlisted third degree felonies — should have been ranked as level 1 offenses. § 921.0012; 921.0013 (1993).
Because the trial court was not aware that it was using an incorrect seoresheet, on remand the court may consider whether it would be proper to impose a departure sentence. See State v. Betancourt, 552 So.2d 1107 (Fla.1989).
Sentence vacated; remanded for further consistent proceedings.