Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ivan SIGMOND-BALLESTEROS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2002-10-24
Citations: 309 F.3d 545
Docket Number: No. 00-50408
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ivan SIGMOND-BALLESTEROS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before: FERGUSON, TASHIMA, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 309
Pages: 545–550

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ivan SIGMOND-BALLESTEROS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 00-50408.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Filed Oct. 24, 2002.
Patrick K. O’Toole, United States Attorney (on brief), Carol C. Lam, United States Attorney (when opinion was filed), David P. Curnow, Assistant United States Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Vince J. Brunkow, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: FERGUSON, TASHIMA, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Order; Dissent by Judge KLEINFELD
ORDER
Judges Tashima and Fisher have voted to deny .the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge Ferguson so recommends.
A judge of the court requested a vote on en banc rehearing, but the vote failed to secure a majority of the nonrecused, active judges of the court.
The petition for rehearing en banc is denied.