Case Name: ELIZABETH WHITTINGHAM, APPELLANT, v. TOWNSHIP OF MILLBURN ET AL., RESPONDENTS
Court: New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1916-12-05
Citations: 90 N.J.L. 348
Docket Number: 
Parties: ELIZABETH WHITTINGHAM, APPELLANT, v. TOWNSHIP OF MILLBURN ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 90
Pages: 348–348

Head Matter:
ELIZABETH WHITTINGHAM, APPELLANT, v. TOWNSHIP OF MILLBURN ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Argued November 29, 1916
Decided December 5, 1916.
On appeal from the Supreme Court.
For the appellant, Cortlandt & Wayne Parker and John O. Bigelow.
For the respondent township of Millburn, Jerome T. Congleton.
For the respondent Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company, Walter. J. Larranee.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons given in the per curiam in Whittingham v. Township of Millburn et al., No. 125, present term of this court, ante p. 344.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Garrison, Trenci-iard, Black, White, Heppeniieimer, Williams, Gardner, JJ. 9.
For reversal—Parker, Bergen, JJ. 2.