Case Name: County of Nassau, Respondent, v. Day Hardie et al., Defendants, and Intercounty Operating Corporation et al., Appellants; Grace E. Connolly, Respondent, v. Timothy Curry et al., Defendants, and Intercounty Operating Corporation, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1945-02-13
Citations: 269 A.D. 667
Docket Number: Appeals Nos. 1 and 2; Appeals Nos. 1 and 2
Parties: County of Nassau, Respondent, v. Day Hardie et al., Defendants, and Intercounty Operating Corporation et al., Appellants. Grace E. Connolly, Respondent, v. Timothy Curry et al., Defendants, and Intercounty Operating Corporation, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 269
Pages: 667–667

Head Matter:
County of Nassau, Respondent, v. Day Hardie et al., Defendants, and Intercounty Operating Corporation et al., Appellants. Grace E. Connolly, Respondent, v. Timothy Curry et al., Defendants, and Intercounty Operating Corporation, Appellant.
(Appeals Nos. 1 and 2.)
(Appeals Nos. 1 and 2.)

Opinion:
—Motion for reargument of appeals or, in the alternative, to amend decisions denied, without costs. The decisions would seem to be clear that plaintiff in each case is entitled to costs, and in addition thereto, to such disbursements as were incurred only in respect of the parcels of real property in which the appellants are interested. Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ. [See 268 App. Div. 1066, 1067, 1068; post, p. 671.]