Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles Jerome ADAMS, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2011-06-01
Citations: 433 F. App'x 158
Docket Number: No. 11-6200
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles Jerome ADAMS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 433
Pages: 158–158

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles Jerome ADAMS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11-6200.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 26, 2011.
Decided: June 1, 2011.
Charles Jerome Adams, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Todd Hagins, South Carolina Law Enforcement Division, Columbia, South Carolina; William Norman Nettles, United States Attorney, Peter Thomas Phillips, Jane Barrett Taylor, Assistant United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Charles Jerome Adams appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). In his informal appellate brief, Adams fails to address the merits of his motion. Adams therefore has forfeited appellate review of his eligibility for a § 3582 reduction. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b) ("The Court will limit its review to the issues raised in the informal brief."). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
On appeal, Adams asserts only that venue for his motion was improper. Our review of the record reveals no abuse of discretion by the district court.