Case Name: Joseph ROBERTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WARDEN; William L. Bruekman, Defendants-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2007-02-22
Citations: 217 F. App'x 234
Docket Number: No. 06-7385
Parties: Joseph ROBERTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WARDEN; William L. Bruekman, Defendants-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 217
Pages: 234–235

Head Matter:
Joseph ROBERTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WARDEN; William L. Bruekman, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 06-7385.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 15, 2007.
Decided: Feb. 22, 2007.
Joseph Roberts, Appellant Pro Se. David Reid Moore, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland; Melissa Shane Whipkey, McGuire Woods, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Joseph Roberts appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Roberts v. Warden, No. 8:05-cv-01981-PJM (D.Md. July 24, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.