Case Name: UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Richard R. RADA, Private, U.S. Army, Appellant
Court: United States Court of Military Appeals
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1975-11-07
Citations: 1 M.J. 213
Docket Number: No. 30,826
Parties: UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Richard R. RADA, Private, U.S. Army, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: West's Military Justice Reporter
Volume: 1
Pages: 213–213

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Richard R. RADA, Private, U.S. Army, Appellant.
No. 30,826.
U. S. Court of Military Appeals.
Nov. 7, 1975.
Colonel Alton H. Harvey, Captain Michael R. Caryl, and Captain John M. Nolan were on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.
Captain Larry R. McDowell and Captain Richard S. Kleager were on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion:
OPINION OF THE COURT
PER CURIAM:
Here, as in United States v. Cree, 1 M.J. 210 (1975), the accused contends that the staff judge advocate's post-trial review is erroneous and prejudicial because it includes a summary of the evidence of an offense of which the accused was acquitted. For the reasons set out in our opinion in Cree, we affirm the decision of the Court of Military Review.