Case Name: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. James A. CABBAGESTALK, Respondent
Court: Florida Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1986-05-01
Citations: 487 So. 2d 1055
Docket Number: No. 66993
Parties: STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. James A. CABBAGESTALK, Respondent.
Judges: BOYD, C.J., and OVERTON, MCDONALD, EHRLICH, SHAW and BARRETT, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 487
Pages: 1055–1056

Head Matter:
STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. James A. CABBAGESTALK, Respondent.
No. 66993.
Supreme Court of Florida.
May 1, 1986.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Joy B. Shearer, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for petitioner.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender and Ellen Morris, Asst. Public Defender, Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, West Palm Beach, for respondent.

Opinion:
ADKINS, Justice.
In Cabbagestalk v. State, 473 So.2d 718 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), the Fourth District, on the authority of Tamer v. State, 463 So.2d 1236 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984), held the exclusionary rule applicable to probation revocation proceedings and certified to this Court the following question:
Under the 1983 amendment to article I, section 12 of the Florida Constitution, does the exclusionary rule apply in probation revocation hearings?
We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.
Because we have recently answered this question in the affirmative in State v. Cross, 487 So.2d 1056 (Fla.1986), we ap prove the decision of the district court on the authority of Cross.
It is so ordered.
BOYD, C.J., and OVERTON, MCDONALD, EHRLICH, SHAW and BARRETT, JJ., concur.