Case Name: IN RE: Eliston F. GEORGE, Petitioner
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2017-05-04
Citations: 688 F. App'x 120
Docket Number: No. 17-1129
Parties: IN RE: Eliston F. GEORGE, Petitioner
Judges: Before: SMITH, CHIEF JUDGE, MCKEE and FUENTES, Circuit Judges
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 688
Pages: 120–120

Head Matter:
IN RE: Eliston F. GEORGE, Petitioner
No. 17-1129
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
(Opinion filed: May 4, 2017)
Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P. February 23, 2017
Eliston F. George, Pro Se
Pamela R. Tepper, Esq., Su-Layne U. Walker, Esq., Office of Attorney General of Virgin Islands, Department of Justice, St. Thomas, VI, for Defendant-Respondent
Before: SMITH, CHIEF JUDGE, MCKEE and FUENTES, Circuit Judges

Opinion:
OPINION
PER CURIAM
Eliston F. George filed a petition for writ of mandamus requesting that we direct the District Court to rule on his petition for a writ of audita querela. The District Court has since ruled on George's petition, and George has filed a notice of appeal. In light of the District Court's action, the question George presented is no longer a live controversy, so we will dismiss his mandamus petition as moot. See, e.g., Lusardi v. Xerox Corp., 975 F.2d 964, 974 (3d Cir. 1992).
This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent.