Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jason Landis LINDER, a/k/a Black, a/k/a Rodney Peterson, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2009-03-24
Citations: 561 F.3d 339
Docket Number: No. 07-6137
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jason Landis LINDER, a/k/a Black, a/k/a Rodney Peterson, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Federal Reporter 3d Series
Volume: 561
Pages: 339–345

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jason Landis LINDER, a/k/a Black, a/k/a Rodney Peterson, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 07-6137.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
March 24, 2009.
Darryl James Mitchell, Special Assistant U. S. Attorney, Office of the U. S. Attorney, Norfolk, VA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Jason Landis Linder, United States Penitentiary, Lewisburg, PA, pro se.

Opinion:
ORDER
Appellant filed a petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc.
The panel voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Accordingly, the petition for rehearing is denied.
A member of the Court requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc. Chief Judge Williams and Judges Wilkin son, Niemeyer, Traxler, King, Shedd, Duncan, and Agee voted to deny rehearing en banc. Judges Michael, Motz, and Gregory voted to grant rehearing en banc.
Because the poll on rehearing en banc failed to produce a majority of judges in active service in favor of rehearing en banc, the petition for rehearing en banc is denied.
Judge Motz wrote an opinion dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc.
OPINION