Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sergio GONZALEZ-MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2005-12-12
Citations: 155 F. App'x 356
Docket Number: No. 04-10537
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Sergio GONZALEZ-MARTINEZ, Defendant—Appellant.
Judges: Before: GOODWIN, W. FLETCHER, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 155
Pages: 356–356

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Sergio GONZALEZ-MARTINEZ, Defendant—Appellant.
No. 04-10537.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 5, 2005.
Decided Dec. 12, 2005.
Susan Baumann, USTU — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for PlaintiffAppellee.
Myrna Rodriguez Beards, Esq., Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: GOODWIN, W. FLETCHER, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Sergio Gonzalez-Martinez appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction to one count of illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
Because Gonzalez-Martinez was sentenced under the then-mandatory Sentencing Guidelines, and we cannot reliably determine from the record whether the sentence imposed would have been materially different had the district court known that the Guidelines were advisory, we remand to the sentencing court for further proceedings consistent with United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez, 419 F.3d 906, 916 (9th Cir.2005).
REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.