Case Name: Georgina Mason, Respondent, v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Appellant
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1932-07
Citations: 236 A.D. 734
Docket Number: 
Parties: Georgina Mason, Respondent, v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Appellant.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 236
Pages: 734–734

Head Matter:
Georgina Mason, Respondent, v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Appellant.

Opinion:
Judgment reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. The direction of a verdict in favor of the plaintiff on the ground that the affidavit of Rogers was insufficient in law was error. The affidavit complies with section 92 of the Insurance Law. The complaint, however, may not be dismissed since the proof in the case, which the trial court apparently deemed sufficient with respect to non-payment of the premium for 1926, is too unsatisfactory to warrant its being accepted as sufficiently establishing the fact of non-payment of that premium. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 374-a.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.
Amd. by Laws of 1918, chap. 130.— [Rep.
Added by Laws of 1928, chap. 532.— [Rep.