Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Phillip SAPP and Monica Sapp, Appellants
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1997-04-22
Citations: 948 S.W.2d 137
Docket Number: Nos. 69656, 69657
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Phillip SAPP and Monica Sapp, Appellants.
Judges: Before CRAHAN, P.J., and GRIMM and HOFF, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 948
Pages: 137–137

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Phillip SAPP and Monica Sapp, Appellants.
Nos. 69656, 69657.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
April 22, 1997.
Phillip Sapp and Monica Sapp, Hillsboro, pro se.
Matthew P. Brookman, Hillsboro, for respondent.
Before CRAHAN, P.J., and GRIMM and HOFF, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
In a consolidated appeal, Appellants, acting pro se, appeal the judgment entered upon their convictions by a jury of animal neglect, § 578.009 RSMo 1994, a class C misdemean- or. Appellants each received a sentence of seven days in jail and fine of $300.00. Appellants assert five points of error, none of which are in compliance with Rule 30.06. Further, Appellants failed to file a motion for new trial as required by Rule 29.11(d). Therefore, Appellants failed to preserve any point of error for review. Nevertheless, in the exercise of our discretion, we have reviewed Appellants' brief and the record on appeal for plain error. Rule 30.20. We find no error. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).