Case Name: James L. KERFOOT, et al., Plaintiffs, Joy R. Webster, as Trustee in Bankruptcy for James and Sylvia Kerfoot, Natasha Golden, as Administratrix of the Estate of Sylvia F. Kerfoot, Natasha Golden, personal representative and administratrix of the Estate of James L. Kerfoot, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FNF SERVICING, INC., a foreign corporation, d.b.a. Loan Care Serving Center, Inc., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-05-23
Citations: 649 F. App'x 1008
Docket Number: No. 15-14513
Parties: James L. KERFOOT, et al., Plaintiffs, Joy R. Webster, as Trustee in Bankruptcy for James and Sylvia Kerfoot, Natasha Golden, as Administratrix of the Estate of Sylvia F. Kerfoot, Natasha Golden, personal representative and administratrix of the Estate of James L. Kerfoot, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FNF SERVICING, INC., a foreign corporation, d.b.a. Loan Care Serving Center, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Bankruptcy Reporter
Volume: 556
Pages: 1008–1009

Head Matter:
James L. KERFOOT, et al., Plaintiffs, Joy R. Webster, as Trustee in Bankruptcy for James and Sylvia Kerfoot, Natasha Golden, as Administratrix of the Estate of Sylvia F. Kerfoot, Natasha Golden, personal representative and administratrix of the Estate of James L. Kerfoot, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FNF SERVICING, INC., a foreign corporation, d.b.a. Loan Care Serving Center, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 15-14513.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
May 23, 2016.
Charles A. Gower, Miranda J. Brash, Charles A. Gower, PC, Columbus, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Michael Edward Lacy, Richmond, VA, John C. Lynch, Virginia Beach, VA, Alexandria J. Reyes, Troutman Sanders, LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.
Honorable John M. Rogers, United States Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Plaintiffs appeal the summary judgment the district court granted defendant on the three claims of their amended complaint: Count One, alleging a violation of the Georgia RICO statute, O.C.G.A. § 16-14-1 et seq., Count Two, alleging a common law tort claim, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, and Count Three, alleging violations of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, 12 U.S.C. § 2605(e), Having heard oral argument from counsel for the parties and considered their briefs, we conclude for the reasons stated by the district court in its dispositive order of September 10, 2015, Doc. 122, that the district court properly granted defendant summary judgment.
AFFIRMED.