Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paul NAGY, Defendant-Appellant
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2001-06-08
Citations: 11 F. App'x 316
Docket Number: No. 01-6149
Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paul NAGY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judges: Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 11
Pages: 316–316

Head Matter:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paul NAGY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 01-6149.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 31, 2001.
Decided June 8, 2001.
Paul Nagy, pro se. Michael David Bredenberg, Jerri Ulrica Dunston, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, NC, for appellee.
Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Paul Nagy appeals the district court's order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Nagy, No. CA-98-951-5-BO-2 (E.D.N.C. filed Dec. 13, 2000; entered Dec. 14, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.