Case Name: Vanzant vs. The State of Georgia ; Zimmer vs. Dansby ; Frost vs. The State; Oliver vs. Whitaker & Son; Jackson vs. The State ; Bearden vs. The State ; Milton vs. Hill ; Johnston et ux. vs. Jackson ; Alford vs. The State ; Robertson, adm'r, vs. Morris ; Toole alias Luke. vs. The State; Gardenhire vs. The State; Wells vs. The State ; Mercer & DeGraffenreid vs. Jackson ; Goyen vs. The State
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia
Jurisdiction: Georgia
Decision Date: 1879-02
Citations: 63 Ga. 158
Docket Number: 
Parties: Vanzant vs. The State of Georgia ; Zimmer vs. Dansby ; Frost vs. The State; Oliver vs. Whitaker & Son; Jackson vs. The State ; Bearden vs. The State ; Milton vs. Hill ; Johnston et ux. vs. Jackson ; Alford vs. The State ; Robertson, adm’r, vs. Morris ; Toole alias Luke. vs. The State; Gardenhire vs. The State; Wells vs. The State ; Mercer & DeGraffenreid vs. Jackson ; Goyen vs. The State.
Judges: 
Reporter: Georgia Reports
Volume: 63
Pages: 158–158

Head Matter:
Vanzant vs. The State of Georgia ; Zimmer vs. Dansby ; Frost vs. The State; Oliver vs. Whitaker & Son; Jackson vs. The State ; Bearden vs. The State ; Milton vs. Hill ; Johnston et ux. vs. Jackson ; Alford vs. The State ; Robertson, adm’r, vs. Morris ; Toole alias Luke. vs. The State; Gardenhire vs. The State; Wells vs. The State ; Mercer & DeGraffenreid vs. Jackson ; Goyen vs. The State.
No reports or opinions are published in the following: cases under the provisions of act of March 2, 1875.

Opinion:
Jackson, Justice.
The discretion of the court below in granting or refusing a new trial will not be controlled where there is evidence to sustain the verdict,, unless some well recognized principle of law or equity be violated.