Case Name: George WIGHT, Jr., et al., Appellants, v. G. Leonard GIOIA, M.D., et al., Appellees
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2004-01-16
Citations: 862 So. 2d 955
Docket Number: No. 5D03-1771
Parties: George WIGHT, Jr., et al., Appellants, v. G. Leonard GIOIA, M.D., et al., Appellees.
Judges: SHARP, W., GRIFFIN and MONACO, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 862
Pages: 955–955

Head Matter:
George WIGHT, Jr., et al., Appellants, v. G. Leonard GIOIA, M.D., et al., Appellees.
No. 5D03-1771.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Jan. 16, 2004.
Casey Walker of Moss, Henderson, Blanton, Lanier, Kretschmer & Murphy, P.A., Vero Beach, for Appellants.
Gregory A. Anderson and Brett A. Hastings of Anderson, St. Denis & Glenn, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We conclude that the lower court had jurisdiction to hear the merits of the appellants' motion to set aside final judgment filed pursuant to Rule 1.540, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, and that it was error to decline to hear the motion on jurisdictional grounds. See Leisure Resorts, Inc. v. City of West Palm Beach, 736 So.2d 1278 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). Ruling on the motion would not impinge on or interfere with our consideration of the other final judgment rendered by the trial court, which is the subject of the appeal in Rivard v. Gioia, Case No. 5D02-3112. On remand, therefore, the trial court should consider and rule on the merits of the motion.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
SHARP, W., GRIFFIN and MONACO, JJ., concur.