Case Name: Joe Paetzold v. The State
Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Jurisdiction: Texas
Decision Date: 1925-11-25
Citations: 102 Tex. Crim. 315
Docket Number: No. 9506
Parties: Joe Paetzold v. The State.
Judges: 
Reporter: Texas Criminal Reports
Volume: 102
Pages: 315–316

Head Matter:
Joe Paetzold v. The State.
No. 9506.
Delivered November 25, 1925.
Umphries, Mood & Clayton, for appellant.
Sam D. Stinson, State’s Attorney, and Nat Gentry, Jr., Assistant State’s Attorney, for the State.

Opinion:
MORROW, Presiding Judge.
The offense is the unlawful manufacture of intoxicating liquor; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.
The State has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on account of an insufficient recognizance. Appellant's counsel concedes that the motion is good. The appeal is therefore dismissed. However, it may be reinstated within fifteen days by the filing of a new recognizance or appeal bond in accord with Title 10, C. C. P. of 1925.
Appeal dismissed.