Case Name: JULIA SARNER, PLAINTIFF, v. SIDNEY SARNER, DEFENDANT. IN THE MATTER OF SIDNEY SARNER, CHARGED WITH CONTEMPT, APPELLANT
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1959-01-05
Citations: 28 N.J. 519
Docket Number: 
Parties: JULIA SARNER, PLAINTIFF, v. SIDNEY SARNER, DEFENDANT. IN THE MATTER OF SIDNEY SARNER, CHARGED WITH CONTEMPT, APPELLANT.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Reports
Volume: 28
Pages: 519–526

Head Matter:
JULIA SARNER, PLAINTIFF, v. SIDNEY SARNER, DEFENDANT. IN THE MATTER OF SIDNEY SARNER, CHARGED WITH CONTEMPT, APPELLANT.
Argued December 15, 1958
Decided January 5, 1959.
See also 45 N. J. Super. 216, 132 A. 2d 28, certification denied 25 N. J. 103, 135 A. 2d 59.
Mr. Aaron IF. Nussman argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Bach, Nussman & Bose, attorneys).
Mr. James A. Major argued the cause for the respondent.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Coneord in the court below.
For affirmance—Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Heher, Wacheneeld, Burling, Jacobs, Francis and Proctor—7.
For reversal—Hone.