Case Name: Chris MURRAY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, U.S. Attorney General; Immigration and Customs Enforcement-(ICE); United States Department of Justice, Respondents-Appellees
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2016-08-30
Citations: 656 F. App'x 19
Docket Number: No. 16-6585
Parties: Chris MURRAY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, U.S. Attorney General; Immigration and Customs Enforcement—(ICE); United States Department of Justice, Respondents-Appellees.
Judges: Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 656
Pages: 19–20

Head Matter:
Chris MURRAY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, U.S. Attorney General; Immigration and Customs Enforcement—(ICE); United States Department of Justice, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 16-6585
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: August 25, 2016
Decided: August 30, 2016
Chris Murray, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Elizabeth Andersen, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Chris Murray appeals the district court's order granting the Government's motion to dismiss in his action seeking mandamus relief. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Murray v. Lynch, No. 8:14-cv-03865-TDC, 2016 WL 1071004 (D. Md. Mar. 17, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED