Case Name: Eileen HAMALL-DESAI, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-02-02
Citations: 164 F. App'x 963
Docket Number: No. 05-11869
Parties: Eileen HAMALL-DESAI, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee.
Judges: Before BLACK, HULL and FARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 164
Pages: 963–963

Head Matter:
Eileen HAMALL-DESAI, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee.
No. 05-11869.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Feb. 2, 2006.
Pamela llene Atkins, Galler & Atkins, LLC, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff-AppelleeCross-Appellant.
Joshua Bachrach, Rawle & Henderson, Philadelphia, PA, Alfred L. Evans, III, Austin & Sparks, P.C., Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee.
Before BLACK, HULL and FARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Honorable Jerome Farris, United States Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
AFFIRMED. See 11th Cir. R. 36-1.
. 11th Cir. R. 36-1 provides:
When the court determines that any of the following circumstances exist:
(a) judgment of the district court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous;
(b) the evidence in support of a jury verdict is sufficient; (c) the order of an administrative agency is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole;
(d) summary judgment, directed verdict, or judgment on the pleadings is supported by the record;
(e) judgment has been entered without a reversible error of law; and an opinion would have no precedential value, the judgment or order may be affirmed or enforced without opinion.