Case Name: Allen J. CROTZER, a/k/a Allen J. Cortzer, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1983-01-05
Citations: 425 So. 2d 159
Docket Number: No. 82-1209
Parties: Allen J. CROTZER, a/k/a Allen J. Cortzer, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: BOARDMAN, A.C.J., and GRIMES and DANAHY, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 425
Pages: 159–160

Head Matter:
Allen J. CROTZER, a/k/a Allen J. Cortzer, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 82-1209.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Jan. 5, 1983.
Jerry Hill, Public Defender, Bartow, and Deborah A. Adamson, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and David T. Weisbrod, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm appellant's convictions but remand for correction of the sentences on counts 1 and 10.
First, the trial court's retention of jurisdiction over count 1, the attempted robbery conviction, must be stricken, since section 947.16(3), Florida Statutes (1981), which.permits retention of jurisdiction over sentences for certain enumerated offenses, does not include attempted robbery on the list of applicable offenses. See Williams v. State, 374 So.2d 1086 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). Second, it is apparent from the colloquy at the sentencing hearing that the trial court intended that the sentences for the two sexual battery convictions run concurrently and not consecutively as shown on the written sentence on count 10. Thus, the sentence must be corrected to reflect concurrent sentences on the sexual battery convictions.
There being no merit to appellant's remaining contentions, his convictions are affirmed.
Accordingly, the judgments against appellant are affirmed, but the cause is remanded for correction of two of his sentences. Appellant need not be present for this purpose.
BOARDMAN, A.C.J., and GRIMES and DANAHY, JJ., concur.