Case Name: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. James McDANIELS, Appellant; James McDANIELS, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1995-02-07
Citations: 891 S.W.2d 901
Docket Number: Nos. 63028, 64875
Parties: STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. James McDANIELS, Appellant. James McDANIELS, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Judges: Before SMITH, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and WHITE, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 891
Pages: 901–901

Head Matter:
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. James McDANIELS, Appellant. James McDANIELS, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Nos. 63028, 64875.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.
Feb. 7, 1995.
Susan K. Eckles, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Michelle A. Freund, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before SMITH, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and WHITE, JJ.

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals from conviction by a jury of possession of PCP, a controlled substance and his eleven year imprisonment sentence as a prior and persistent offender. He also appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion following an evidentia-ry hearing. The points raised by defendant on appeal are without merit. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The findings of fact by the trial court on the Rule 29.15 motion are not clearly eiToneous and support the trial court's judgment. No error of law appears. Affir-mance is made in compliance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b). Defendant's motion for remand is denied.
Judgments affirmed.