Case Name: Cary W. LANG, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD CO., and Union Pacific Railroad Co., Defendants/Appellants
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Missouri
Decision Date: 1994-11-01
Citations: 886 S.W.2d 218
Docket Number: No. 65373
Parties: Cary W. LANG, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD CO., and Union Pacific Railroad Co., Defendants/Appellants.
Judges: Before AHRENS, P.J., and SIMON and KAROHL, JJ.
Reporter: South Western Reporter Second Series
Volume: 886
Pages: 218–218

Head Matter:
Cary W. LANG, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD CO., and Union Pacific Railroad Co., Defendants/Appellants.
No. 65373.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.
Nov. 1, 1994.
Stephen M. Buckley, St. Louis, for appellants.
Jerome J. Schliehter, Robert S. Bogard, Steven L. Groves, Schliehter, Bogard, & Denton, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before AHRENS, P.J., and SIMON and KAROHL, JJ.

Opinion:
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
In this jury-tried ease, defendants appeal a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $185,000 in an action pursuant to the Federal Employers' Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. § 51, et seq.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).