Case Name: HARBORSIDE WAREHOUSE COMPANY, INC., PROSECUTOR-APPELLANT, v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1942-09-18
Citations: 129 N.J.L. 62
Docket Number: 
Parties: HARBORSIDE WAREHOUSE COMPANY, INC., PROSECUTOR-APPELLANT, v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 129
Pages: 62–62

Head Matter:
HARBORSIDE WAREHOUSE COMPANY, INC., PROSECUTOR-APPELLANT, v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Argued May 21, 1942
Decided September 18, 1942.
For the appellant, Wall, Haight, Carey & Hartpence.
For the respondents, Charles A. Rooney, Frank P. McCarthy and John F. Lynch, Jr.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The case as presented exhibits only a dispute of fact with regard to the proper valuation of a warehouse building for purposes of taxation. The determination of the State Board of Tax Appeals, whose opinion is reported at 19 N. J. Mis. R. 222, adjudged a valuation which was affirmed in the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported at 128 N. J. L. 263.
The settled rule in cases of this class is that, where the judgment of the Supreme Court on the facts is supported by proper evidence, this court will not reverse its findings. Kohn v. Tilt, 103 N. J. L. 110; Angelotti v. Town of Montclair, 109 Id. 360; Ford Motor Co. v. Fernandez et al., 114 Id. 202.
The judgment will be affirmed.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Donges, Heher, Colie, Dear, Wells, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 11.
For reversal—None.