Case Name: HUMBERTO INDA-ROCHA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE OF OREGON, Defendant-Respondent
Court: Oregon Court of Appeals
Jurisdiction: Oregon
Decision Date: 2016-02-24
Citations: 276 Or. App. 607
Docket Number: 130710198; A156158
Parties: HUMBERTO INDA-ROCHA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE OF OREGON, Defendant-Respondent.
Judges: Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Egan, Judge, and Shorr, Judge.
Reporter: Oregon Reports, Court of Appeals
Volume: 276
Pages: 607–607

Head Matter:
Argued and submitted January 19,
affirmed February 24,
petition for review denied September 15, 2016 (360 Or 400)
HUMBERTO INDA-ROCHA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE OF OREGON, Defendant-Respondent.
Multnomah County Circuit Court
130710198; A156158
369 P3d 418
Jason Weber argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was O’Connor Weber LLR
Jonathan N. Schildt, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General, and Paul L. Smith, Deputy Solicitor General.
Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Egan, Judge, and Shorr, Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM
Affirmed. Brown v. Baldwin, 131 Or App 356, 885 P2d 707 (1994), rev den, 320 Or 507 (1995).