Case Name: Booker T. ABNER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-11-01
Citations: 783 So. 2d 1086
Docket Number: No. 3D99-3067
Parties: Booker T. ABNER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before GODERICH and SORONDO, JJ., and NESBITT, Senior Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 783
Pages: 1086–1086

Head Matter:
Booker T. ABNER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D99-3067.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov. 1, 2000.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Gonzalo Alberto Gayoso, Special Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Richard L. Polin, Assistant Attorney General, and Jennifer M. Gillihan, Certified Legal Intern, for appellee.
Before GODERICH and SORONDO, JJ., and NESBITT, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
Booker T. Abner appeals from an order of revocation of probation and sentence. Upon review of the record, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding that Abner violated the conditions of his probation. Accordingly, we affirm the revocation of probation. However, we must remand this cause to the trial court with directions that it correct the written order of revocation so that it conforms with the court's oral pronouncements made during the probation revocation hearing. See Masis v. State, 758 So.2d 1290 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).
Additionally, based upon the state's confession of error, on remand the trial judge is directed to determine whether Abner was adversely affected by the 1995 sentencing guidelines, and if so, to resentence him pursuant to the 1994 guidelines. See Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000); Diaz v. State, 752 So.2d 105 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).
Affirmed in part; remanded with directions.