Case Name: Steven E. TARPLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James REILLY, Clerk, et al., Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2008-01-24
Citations: 261 F. App'x 540
Docket Number: No. 07-7093
Parties: Steven E. TARPLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James REILLY, Clerk, et al., Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 261
Pages: 540–540

Head Matter:
Steven E. TARPLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James REILLY, Clerk, et al., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 07-7093.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 9, 2008.
Decided: Jan. 24, 2008.
Steven E. Tarpley, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM:
Steven E. Tarpley appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Tarpley v. Reilly, No. 1:06-cv-00365-BEL (D.Md. July 12, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED. '