Case Name: Miguel TRUJILLO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2018-10-19
Citations: 255 So. 3d 532
Docket Number: Case No. 5D18-2333
Parties: Miguel TRUJILLO, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: 
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Third Series
Volume: 255
Pages: 532–533

Head Matter:
Miguel TRUJILLO, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Case No. 5D18-2333
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Opinion filed October 19, 2018
Miguel Trujillo, Raiford, pro se.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison L. Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the trial court's summary denial of Ground 1 of Appellant's Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 Motion for Postconviction Relief because Appellant should have been afforded the opportunity to amend his facially insufficient claim. See Taylor v. State , 248 So.3d 280, 281 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018) ("Because [appellant] had not previously sought or been given leave to amend his rule 3.850 motion, and because the pleading deficiency in his motion is likely correctable, he should be given the chance to do so.") The trial court's order is otherwise affirmed.
AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part; and REMANDED.
COHEN, C.J., ORFINGER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.