Case Name: Frank HEINZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 2000-05-24
Citations: 758 So. 2d 743
Docket Number: No. 3D99-1940
Parties: Frank HEINZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GODERICH, JJ„ and NESBITT, Senior Judge.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 758
Pages: 743–744

Head Matter:
Frank HEINZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D99-1940.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 24, 2000.
Frank Heinz, in proper person.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Darien M. Doe, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GODERICH, JJ„ and NESBITT, Senior Judge.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court's denial of the defendant's petition for writ of mandamus. Although the petitioner alleged that he was entitled to copies of his transcript from his specially-appointed public defender, he nevertheless filed the petition against the wrong party, the State. This affirmance is without prejudice for the petitioner to refile his petition against the proper party, his specially-appointed public defender.
Affirmed.