Case Name: Samir I. TAHA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2006-12-15
Citations: 212 F. App'x 699
Docket Number: No. 06-35120
Parties: Samir I. TAHA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before: GOODWIN, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 212
Pages: 699–700

Head Matter:
Samir I. TAHA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. IKON FINANCIAL SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 06-35120.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 14, 2006 .
Filed Dec. 15, 2006.
Samir I. Taha, Beaverton, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Kristin L. Olson, Esq., Bullivant Houser Bailey, PC, Pioneer Tower, Portland, OR, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before: GOODWIN, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Samir I. Taha appeals pro se from the district court's order dismissing for failure to state a claim his civil rights action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Warren v. Fox Family Worldwide, Inc., 328 F.3d 1136, 1139 (9th Cir.2003), and we affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Taha's action for the reasons stated in its order filed January 24, 2006. Contrary to Taha's contention, the district court did not refuse to recognize his first amended complaint. The complaint was filed on September 28, 2005, and the district court addressed its legal infirmities in the dismissal order.
We are not persuaded by Taha's remaining contentions.
Taha's motion to strike is denied.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.