Case Name: John Ted WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1987-01-29
Citations: 501 So. 2d 727
Docket Number: No. BM-178
Parties: John Ted WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Judges: WENTWORTH, WIGGINTON and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 501
Pages: 727–728

Head Matter:
John Ted WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. BM-178.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jan. 29, 1987.
Jefferson W. Morrow and Raymond A. David, Jr., Jacksonville, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Mark C. Menser, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
See State v. Wright, 473 So.2d 268 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985) and State v. Whitfield, 487 So.2d 1045 (Fla.1986), holding that "the absence of the statutorily mandated findings rendered the sentences illegal because, in their absence, there was no statutory authority for the sentences."
AFFIRMED.
WENTWORTH, WIGGINTON and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.