Case Name: MID-VALLEY PIPELINE CO. v. KING, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE, et al.
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1969-01-13
Citations: 393 U.S. 321
Docket Number: No. 756
Parties: MID-VALLEY PIPELINE CO. v. KING, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE, et al.
Judges: Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice White are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Reporter: United States Reports
Volume: 393
Pages: 321–321

Head Matter:
MID-VALLEY PIPELINE CO. v. KING, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE, et al.
No. 756.
Decided January 13, 1969.
H. Vincent E. Mitchell and J.. Martin Regan for appellant.
George F. McCanless, Attorney General of Tennessee, and Milton P. Rice, Deputy Attorney General, for appellees.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice White are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.