Case Name: Roger D. HALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John G. KORESKI, Business Manager Department of Corrections, Defendant-Appellee
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 2010-07-20
Citations: 388 F. App'x 689
Docket Number: No. 08-35582
Parties: Roger D. HALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John G. KORESKI, Business Manager Department of Corrections, Defendant-Appellee.
Judges: Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
Reporter: West's Federal Appendix
Volume: 388
Pages: 689–690

Head Matter:
Roger D. HALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John G. KORESKI, Business Manager Department of Corrections, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 08-35582.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted June 29, 2010.
Filed July 20, 2010.
Roger D. Hall, pro se.
Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

Opinion:
MEMORANDUM
Roger D. Hall, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action seeking a wilt of mandamus to halt the ongoing garnishment of his prison trust account and to recover funds already garnished. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Stewart v. U.S. Bancorp, 297 F.3d 953, 956 (9th Cir.2002). We affirm.
The district court properly dismissed the action as barred by the doctrine of res judicata because Hall has already litigated his claims arising out of the garnishment of his prison trust account. See Hall v. Hill, No. 3:04-cv-01752-AS, slip op. at 2 (D.Or. Nov. 21, 2005), aff'd, 225 Fed.Appx. 595 (9th Cir.2007); see also Stewart, 297 F.3d at 956 (describing elements of res judicata).
Appellee's motion for leave to appear and for briefing schedule is denied as moot.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.