Case Name: FRANK KAFTON, RESPONDENT, v. EDWARD O. WICKBERG ET AL., APPELLANTS
Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1939-01-13
Citations: 121 N.J.L. 586
Docket Number: 
Parties: FRANK KAFTON, RESPONDENT, v. EDWARD O. WICKBERG ET AL., APPELLANTS.
Judges: 
Reporter: New Jersey Law Reports
Volume: 121
Pages: 586–586

Head Matter:
FRANK KAFTON, RESPONDENT, v. EDWARD O. WICKBERG ET AL., APPELLANTS.
Submitted October 28, 1938
Decided January 13, 1939.
For the appellants, John C. Stockel and R. Robinson Chance.
For the respondent, David T. Wilentz, attorney-general.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bodine in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — -The Chancellor, Trenchard, Case, Donges, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Walker, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.