Case Name: Howard Lee Danenhauer, respondent, v. George Edward Danenhauer et al., appellants
Court: New Jersey Court of Chancery
Jurisdiction: New Jersey
Decision Date: 1931-02-02
Citations: 107 N.J. Eq. 597
Docket Number: 
Parties: Howard Lee Danenhauer, respondent, v. George Edward Danenhauer et al., appellants.
Judges: For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Campbell, Bodine, Donges, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 10.
Reporter: New Jersey Equity Reports
Volume: 107
Pages: 597–597

Head Matter:
Howard Lee Danenhauer, respondent, v. George Edward Danenhauer et al., appellants.
[Decided February 2d, 1931.]
Mr. Samuel Morris, for the respondent.
Mr. Isadore Sacies, for the appellant.

Opinion:
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Ingersoll, and reported in 105 N. J. Eq. 449.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Campbell, Bodine, Donges, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 10.
For reversal — Lloyd, Case, Daly, Wells, JJ. 4.