Case Name: The Millstone Point Company v. Anthony Rutka, Jr., et al.
Court: Connecticut Superior Court
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Decision Date: 1966-11-09
Citations: 27 Conn. Supp. 482
Docket Number: File No. 146110
Parties: The Millstone Point Company v. Anthony Rutka, Jr., et al.
Judges: 
Reporter: Connecticut Supplement
Volume: 27
Pages: 482–482

Head Matter:
The Millstone Point Company v. Anthony Rutka, Jr., et al.
Superior Court Hartford County
File No. 146110
Memorandum filed November 9, 1966
Day, Berry & Howard, of Hartford, for the plaintiff.
Groobert & Mahon, of Manchester, for all defendants.
Harold M. Mulvey, attorney general, and John K. Jepson, assistant attorney general, for the state, garnishee.
Courtney, Mansfield, Sullivan & Ripley, of Hartford, for the defendant Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co.

Opinion:
Tedesco, J.
The state of Connecticut filed a plea in abatement for the reason that the process is against the sovereign state of Connecticut or persons acting in their official capacity as officers of the state of Connecticut.
Stephenson, Connecticut Civil Procedure § 36 (d), (e) and (f), pages 78 and 79, states that the rule in the United States is that the state cannot be made a garnishee. While no statute exists in Connecticut, it would be safe to assume that the rule obtains here in the absence of statutes authorizing procedures to allow the state to be garnishee.
The plea in abatement is sustained.