Case Name: William Cranston, Appellant, v. Rochester Central Properties, Inc., Defendant, and Domenica Cusimano, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of " Caruso's Restaurant," Respondent
Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Jurisdiction: New York
Decision Date: 1941-03-21
Citations: 261 A.D. 1051
Docket Number: 
Parties: William Cranston, Appellant, v. Rochester Central Properties, Inc., Defendant, and Domenica Cusimano, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of “ Caruso’s Restaurant,” Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Appellate Division Reports
Volume: 261
Pages: 1051–1052

Head Matter:
William Cranston, Appellant, v. Rochester Central Properties, Inc., Defendant, and Domenica Cusimano, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of “ Caruso’s Restaurant,” Respondent.

Opinion:
Order reversed on the law and facts and verdict reinstated, with costs in both courts. All concur, except Cunningham, J., not voting, (The order sets aside a verdict of the jury in favor of plain tiff and grants a new trial in an action for damages by reason of an icy sidewalk.) Present — Crosby, P. J" Cunningham, Taylor, Harris and McCum, JJ.*' 111