Case Name: R. L. Crook and Estate of Mrs. R. L. Crook, Petitioners, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent
Court: United States Board of Tax Appeals
Jurisdiction: United States
Decision Date: 1926-10-27
Citations: 5 B.T.A. 197
Docket Number: Docket Nos. 2646, 2647
Parties: R. L. Crook and Estate of Mrs. R. L. Crook, Petitioners, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent.
Judges: 
Reporter: Reports of the United States Board of Tax Appeals
Volume: 5
Pages: 197–198

Head Matter:
R. L. Crook and Estate of Mrs. R. L. Crook, Petitioners, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent.
Docket Nos. 2646, 2647.
Decided October 27, 1926.
Pike IIall, Jr., Esq., for the petitioners.
W. Prank Gibbs, Esq., for the respondent.

Opinion:
OPINION.
Trammell :
The valuation of the stock and bonds is the only question involved in this appeal. That is purely a question of fact. The Commissioner determined that each was worth par at the- time received in liquidation. The burden of proof is upon the taxpayers to show that they did not have that value. This the taxpayers have failed to do. R. L. Crook testified that he made inquiry as to the value of the stock and bonds and wrote to the investment bankers in Chicago who underwrote the securities for the International Oil & Gas Corporation when it was organized, and that they advised that they did not have any market for them. Crook sold some of the stock in 1920 at less than par. He did not sell any of the bonds, although he undertook to do so. The evidence, however, does not indicate what efforts were made about the time the stock and bonds were received from the Pine Island Refining Co. in 1919. The Commissioner concedes that the stock and bonds became worthless subsequent to the time they were received by the taxpayers, but there is not sufficient evidence in the record to overcome the presumption of the correctness of the determination of the Commissioner as to the values at the time received.
Judgment will he entered for the Commissioner.