Case Name: ALRODO CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. CARL SCHEFFER-KLUTE GMBH & CO., a West German corporation, Appellee
Court: Florida District Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Florida
Decision Date: 1985-03-12
Citations: 464 So. 2d 1304
Docket Number: No. 83-2108
Parties: ALRODO CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. CARL SCHEFFER-KLUTE GMBH & CO., a West German corporation, Appellee.
Judges: Before HENDRY, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.
Reporter: Southern Reporter, Second Series
Volume: 464
Pages: 1304–1304

Head Matter:
ALRODO CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. CARL SCHEFFER-KLUTE GMBH & CO., a West German corporation, Appellee.
No. 83-2108.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 12, 1985.
Fine, Jacobson, Block, England, Klein, Colan & Simon, Miami, for appellant.
Blackwell, Walker, Gray, Powers, Flick & Hoehl and Diane H. Tutt, Miami, for appellee.
Before HENDRY, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.

Opinion:
PER CURIAM.
The trial court found that appellee breached an exclusive sales agreement, but that (1) no profit losses could be attributed to the breach because appellant had no profit history and its alleged damages were thus too speculative, and (2) the breach did not absolve appellant of liability for an indebtedness incurred prior to the breach. The court's findings and conclusions will not be disturbed on either the main appeal or the cross-appeal because they are supported by competent substantial evidence. Laufer v. Norma Fashions, Inc., 418 So.2d 437 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).
Affirmed.